Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 7/7/2026
** Revised ** REGULAR MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO TUESDAY, JULY 7, 2026 5:30 PM CLOSED SESSION 6:30 PM OPEN SESSION COMMUNITY CENTER 625 S. PICO AVENUE SAN JACINTO, CA 92583 951-487-7330 In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk at 951-487-7330 ext. 339. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]. The City Council meeting may be observed virtually by accessing https://horizon.agendalink.app/engage- v2/sanjacintoca/agendas and selecting the “Watch” button next to the corresponding agenda for the meeting date, or in person at the San Jacinto Community Center. Public Comments will only be accepted in person during the meeting or in writing to the City Clerk no later than 3:00 PM on the day of the meeting. Watch the Meeting (Official Livestream) The official way to watch and listen to the City Council meeting is through the City's AgendaLink livestream by selecting the "Watch" option for the applicable meeting on the City's website. Provide Live Public Comment by Telephone Members of the public wishing to provide live public comment may participate by telephone using the Microsoft Teams dial-in information below. The telephone line is intended only for individuals who wish to address the City Council during the designated Public Comment period. Dial in by phone: +1 (951) 465-7684 Conference ID: 444 922 998# Public Comment Workflow CRYSTAL RUIZ, MAYOR CLARISA SANCHEZ, MAYOR PRO TEM PHIL AYALA, COUNCILMEMBER ALONSO LEDEZMA, COUNCILMEMBER VALERIE VANDEVER, COUNCILMEMBER When the Mayor opens the Public Comment portion of the meeting, the process will be as follows: Members of the public will call the Teams dial-in number and wait in the Teams lobby. Callers should remain in the Teams lobby until the applicable Public Comment period opens. They should not be admitted before the Mayor opens Public Comment. The Clerk will admit one caller at a time from the lobby as they are ready to speak. If multiple callers are waiting, they should remain in the lobby until it is their turn. Once admitted, callers should be able to speak. If necessary, the Clerk can unmute the caller. The Mayor will recognize the caller, and the caller should first state their name for the record before providing their public comment. Each caller will have up to three (3) minutes to speak. After completing their comments, callers may either hang up, or the Clerk may remove them from the meeting before admitting the next speaker. Written public comments may only be submitted via email to comments@sanjacintoca.gov or by hard copy to the Office of the City Clerk at 595 S. San Jacinto Ave., San Jacinto, CA 92583, no later than 3:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted. Please identify the agenda item number and “PUBLIC COMMENT” in the subject line of the email or hard copy document. All written correspondence received by the 3:00 p.m. deadline will be distributed to the legislative body prior to the meeting and retained with the official meeting record. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern in-person speaker comments at the Council meeting. Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk will read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at a Council meeting. The email comments submitted shall become part of the record of the Council meeting. 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Public Comments on Closed Session Items 1.2 Closed Session 1.2.1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: 1 case. 1.3 Closed Session Report 1.4 Roll Call 1.5 Invocation 1.6 Pledge of Allegiance 1.7 Special Presentation(s) 1.7.1. Public Safety Recognition 1.8 Mayor/Council Member Reports 1.9 Late Items 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS 3. CONSENT CALENDAR A. City Council A1.Waiver of Full Reading of Ordinance(s), and Reading by Title Only A2.Warrants and Disbursements - April 2026 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council REVIEW and APPROVE the Warrants and Disbursements for the period of April 2026 in the amount of $6,865,304.99 A3.Report of City-Wide User Fee Increase RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council RECEIVE and FILE the report of the City-Wide User Fee increases. 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 A proposal by Taylor and Clark Consulting on behalf of Richard Michael and Ramona Dairy, LLC, to establish a master- planned residential development consisting of 419 dwelling units as well as the construction of onsite roadways, a detention basin, parks, and on-site landscaping on 73.97-net acres. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: — 1. DETERMINE that the proposed Project will not have a significant effect on the environment with the incorporation of mitigation measures based on the findings set forth in the case record and ADOPT a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); — 2. APPROVE a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Very Low Density Residential (VLDR) to Low Density Residential (LDR); — 3. APPROVE a Change of Zone from Rural Residential (RR) to Residential Low Density (RL); — 4. APPROVE the Chacon Farms Planned Development Permit; and — 5. APPROVE Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 39076 to subdivide 73.97-acres, into 419 single-family lots for the ultimate construction of 419 single-family detached residences, and to create lettered lots for onsite roadways, a detention basin, park, and on-site landscape subject to the Recommended Conditions of Approval (PROJ23-0029). 5. FUTURE REQUESTS FROM CITY COUNCIL TO CITY MANAGER 6. ADJOURNMENT DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OPEN SESSION AGENDAS (SB343) - Any public record, relating to an open session agenda item, that is distributed within 72 hours prior to the meeting is available for public inspection at the public counter located in the Administration Building of City Hall, 595 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583. I, Julia Espinoza, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that I caused to be posted the foregoing agenda this July 1, 2026 as requested by law. ____________________________________ Julia Espinoza, City Clerk Posted Date: July 1, 2026 Date Posted: July 1, 2026 July 7, 2026 TO:City Council REQUESTED BY:Tessa Murphy, Account Clerk III APPROVED BY:Kimberly Ganimian, Finance Director SUBJECT:Warrants and Disbursements - April 2026 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council REVIEW and APPROVE the Warrants and Disbursements for the period of April 2026 in the amount of $6,865,304.99. DISCUSSION: The City Council, in its oversight role, formally reviews disbursements of City funds made by Accounts Payable warrants, bi- weekly payrolls, and electronic funds (wire) transfers. The following information is provided for such review and approval: Warrants/Wire Pay Date Amount Accounts Payable #155619-155893 Various $ 4,298,878.57 Payroll: Pay Period #7 Includes Warrants, Direct Deposits, Taxes, Garnishments #254289-254290 4/2/2026 $ 288,664.49 Payroll: Pay Period #8 Includes Warrants, Direct Deposits, Taxes, Garnishments #254291-254294 4/16/2026 $ 299,272.53 Payroll: Pay Period #9 Includes Warrants, Direct Deposits, Taxes, Garnishments #254295-254298 4/30/2026 $ 292,948.79 Electronic Funds Various $ 1,685,540.61 Total Disbursements-April 1- 30, 2026 $ 6,865,304.99 Prepared by: Tessa Murphy, Account Clerk III Note: Payroll information is on file in the Finance Department. FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditures by warrant, payroll direct deposit, and electronic funds (wire) transfers have been appropriated. Attachments Warrant Register April 2026.pdf City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1556194/3/2026 PERLA AVALOS1,061.82 AVALOS032426 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES 010-2500-425.11-90 1,061.82 1556204/3/2026 B & W PIPE & SUPPLY345.97 176668 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 330.61 176669 SUPPLIES 010-7100-410.21-12 15.36 1556214/3/2026 BABCOCK LABORATORIES, INC.1,373.24 CC60867-0278 COLIFORMS BY MMO/MUG&HPC 050-9000-450.30-90 94.40 CC61077-278 IRON & MANGANESE 050-9000-450.30-90 151.04 CC61368-0278 COLIFORMS BY MMO/MUG&HPC 050-9000-450.30-90 94.40 CC61525-0278 ACIDS & TRIHALOMETHANES 050-9000-450.30-90 920.12 CC61814-0278 COLIFORMS BY MMO/MUG&HPC 050-9000-450.30-90 18.88 CC61815-0278 COLIFORMS BY MMO/MUG&HPC 050-9000-450.30-90 94.40 1556224/3/2026 FU-KAI CHEN328.50 CHEN032426 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES 010-2500-425.11-90 328.50 1556234/3/2026 CIVILTEC ENGINEERING INC64,502.32 54922 CM SVCS GRANT TRTMNT PLNT 199-9999-425.40-01 41,598.32 54941 WATER SYS INTERCONNECTION 199-9999-425.40-01 22,904.00 1556244/3/2026 CORE & MAIN LP10,955.24 Y707342 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 4,950.85 Y707342 S/B 8.75% SALES & USE TAX 010-0000-201.20-45(36.86) Y741143 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 6,097.33 Y741143 S/B 8.75% SALES & USE TAX 010-0000-201.20-45(56.08) 1556254/3/2026 FRONTIER86.98 FRONTIER033126 TELEPHONE SERVICES 010-3100-431.35-16 86.98 1556264/3/2026 GARY TOLLIVER76.65 TOLLIVER032626 REFND SPEC EVENT PERMIT 011-0000-308.06-01 73.00 TOLLIVER032626 REFND SPEC EVENT PERMIT 017-0000-310.07-96 3.65 1556274/3/2026 GHA TECHNOLOGIES,INC.155.26 2009690 APPLE PENCIL PRO 017-2290-418.40-45 155.26 1556284/3/2026 SABRINA GLAZE134.33 GLAZE032426 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES 010-2500-425.11-90 134.33 1556294/3/2026 GOVCONNECTION, INC.3,861.68 77477295 SUPPLIES 017-2290-418.40-45 3,861.68 1556304/3/2026 NATHAN HARRINGTON814.00 HARRINGTN031126 26-085 MEAL PER DIEM 017-2290-418.31-20 301.00 HARRINGTN032426 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES 010-2500-425.11-90 513.00 1556314/3/2026 HEMET SPORTMAN'S CLUB2,500.00 HSC033026 S MOUNTAIN SPONSORSHIP 010-2510-425.40-13 2,500.00 1556324/3/2026 HEMET VALLEY TOOL871.27 2666-1 SUPPLIES 010-7101-410.33-30 380.63 QS-1221 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 433.92 Page 1 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1556324/3/2026 HEMET VALLEY TOOL QS-1294 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 56.72 1556334/3/2026 HERITAGE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY18,915.61 0025460372-001 SUPPLIES 025-7252-410.34-05 14,349.58 0025659962-001 CREDIT 0025617001-001 010-7100-410.21-12(147.53) 0025617001-001 SUPPLIES 010-7100-410.21-12 221.53 0025467314-002 METERS 025-7100-410.34-05 1,014.62 0025467314-002 METERS 326-8831-500.34-05 792.32 0025467314-002 METERS 301-8831-500.34-05 792.32 0025467314-002 METERS 308-8831-500.34-05 1,892.77 1556344/3/2026 YANELI HERNANDEZ598.04 HERNANDEZ022326 26-070 MEAL PER DIEM 011-1700-417.31-20 301.00 HERNANDEZ032426 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES 010-2500-425.11-90 297.04 1556354/3/2026 HIRSCH PIPE & SUPPLY CO.,670.53 1728312 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-80 248.24 1737214 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 344.88 1741003 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 77.41 1556364/3/2026 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES841.29 2360117 SUPPLIES 353-8831-500.34-05 66.35 4021213 SUPPLIES 308-8831-500.34-05 11.24 1020990 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 452.12 1360125 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.33-10 311.58 1556374/3/2026 LUCY JOHNSON301.00 JOHNSON032626 26-073 MEAL PER DIEM 010-1400-414.31-20 90.30 JOHNSON032626 26-073 MEAL PER DIEM 010-1701-417.31-20 150.50 JOHNSON032626 26-073 MEAL PER DIEM 050-1400-414.31-20 30.10 JOHNSON032626 26-073 MEAL PER DIEM 055-1400-414.31-20 30.10 1556384/3/2026 KARL'S TRACTOR SERVICE2,654.00 7550 SPRING 2026 DISKING 010-2500-425.34-05 1,757.00 7529 SPRING 2026 DISKING 010-2500-425.34-05 279.00 7526 SPRING 2026 DISKING 010-2500-425.34-05 618.00 1556394/3/2026 FUAAD KHAN525.60 KHAN032426 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES 010-2500-425.11-90 525.60 1556404/3/2026 MATTHEW KRAMER128.96 KRAMER032426 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES 010-2500-425.11-90 128.96 1556414/3/2026 MANPOWER1,297.68 5136996 W/E 3/22/26 010-1210-412.34-05 1,297.68 1556424/3/2026 LORI MATLEY83.41 MATLEY032526 REIMB MEETING DINNER 011-1700-417.38-00 83.41 1556434/3/2026 MCCALL'S METER SALES & SER1,674.18 38343 CONVERSION KIT 050-9000-450.33-30 1,674.18 Page 2 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1556444/3/2026 JULIE MCCOMBS301.00 MCCOMBS022326 26-071 MEAL PER DIEM 011-3300-431.31-20 301.00 1556454/3/2026 RUTH MONTOYA15.00 MONTOYA032426 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES 010-2500-425.11-90 15.00 1556464/3/2026 TESSA MURPHY70.00 MURPHY032526 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES 010-2500-425.11-90 70.00 1556474/3/2026 NEARMAP US, INC12,475.05 INV01787640 SUBSCRIPTION 017-2290-418.34-05 12,475.05 1556484/3/2026 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS785.54 5531-220002 SUPPLIES 010-7100-410.33-50 39.45 5531-220781 SUPPLIES 010-4140-410.21-12 43.20 5531-220703 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.33-50 522.14 5531-220772 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.33-50(44.00) 5531-220787 SUPPLIES 055-4170-450.33-50 18.97 5531-222055 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.33-50 166.33 5531-222403 SUPPLIES 055-4170-450.33-50 39.45 1556494/3/2026 OVERNIGHT INDUSTRIAL SUPPL277.91 1215 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 169.00 1215 SUPPLIES 025-7252-410.34-05 68.40 1215 SUPPLIES 376-8831-500.34-05 40.51 1556504/3/2026 PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORAT633,365.00 5 WORK COMPLETED 199-9999-425.40-01 666,700.00 5 RETENTION WITHHELD 199-0000-210.20-25(33,335.00) 1556514/3/2026 MIGUEL PADILLA744.00 PADILLA032426 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES 010-2500-425.11-90 744.00 1556524/3/2026 PARCELQUEST6,000.00 28446 GIS DATA DELIVERY 017-2290-418.34-05 2,000.00 28446 GIS DATA DELIVERY 017-0000-103.12-34 4,000.00 1556534/3/2026 PAYNE PEST MANAGEMENT INC150.00 432088 MONTHLY SERVICES 010-4200-410.33-10 150.00 1556544/3/2026 PLUMBERS DEPOT, INC.767.94 PD-60822 SUPPLIES 055-4170-450.33-30 767.94 1556554/3/2026 PRECISION CONCRETE CUTTING4,007.74 CSJ020526-01 SIDEWALK CUTTING SVCS 025-7251-410.34-05 2,666.56 CSJ020526-01 SIDEWALK CUTTING SVCS 311-8831-500.34-05 572.12 CSJ020526-01 SIDEWALK CUTTING SVCS 303-8831-500.34-05 769.06 1556564/3/2026 THOMAS PRILL480.00 PRILL032426 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES 010-2500-425.11-90 480.00 1556574/3/2026 TRAVIS RANDEL1,001.83 RANDEL031626 26-047 REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSES 011-1700-417.31-20 914.37 RANDEL031626 REIMB ONBOARDING LUNCH 011-1700-417.30-90 87.46 Page 3 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1556584/3/2026 RIVERSIDE ASSESSOR-COUNTY100.00 CLERK022726 FEB 2026 RECORDATIONS 010-3320-431.30-90 100.00 1556594/3/2026 ROADWAY ENGINEERING297.65 WATER031226 REFUND WATER DEPOSIT 050-0000-229.08-70 123.35 WATER031226 REFUND CREDIT BALANCE 050-0000-308.09-10 174.30 1556604/3/2026 ROMERIL PLUMBING & HARDWAR662.42 20466 SUPPLIES 010-4140-410.21-12 132.60 20488 SUPPLIES 025-7250-410.34-05 130.26 20497 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 45.66 20485 SUPPLIES 010-7100-410.21-12 53.25 20485 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 39.18 20469 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 67.91 20469 SUPPLIES 010-7100-410.21-12 115.24 20469 SUPPLIES 376-8831-500.34-05 6.51 20463 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 71.81 1556614/3/2026 SHARON TERRACCIANO221.01 WATER022626 REFUND WATER DEPOSIT 050-0000-229.08-70 207.64 WATER022626 REFUND CREDIT BALANCE 050-0000-308.09-10 13.37 1556624/3/2026 SMARTSIGHTS, LLC2,805.00 2631752659-1 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 055-0000-103.12-34 1,402.50 2631752659-1 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 050-0000-103.12-34 1,402.50 1556634/3/2026 STAPLES ADVANTAGE812.50 6058884557 SUPPLIES 010-3100-431.21-10 254.39 6058884558 SUPPLIES 050-1400-414.21-10 326.43 6058884558 SUPPLIES 010-1400-414.21-10 231.68 1556644/3/2026 STETSON ENGINEERS INC.3,562.00 2948-13-003 PROF SVC THROUGH 1/31/26 050-9000-450.30-90 3,562.00 1556654/3/2026 SUNBELT RENTALS, INC379.33 181286482-0001 SINGLE AXE TRAILER 025-7100-410.34-05 379.33 1556664/3/2026 TALLEY METAL SUPPLY250.89 122100 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 77.67 122023 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 140.19 122015 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 33.03 1556674/3/2026 JILL THERIOT1,500.00 THERIOT031926 REIMBURSE STUDENT LOAN 010-2500-425.31-20 1,500.00 1556684/3/2026 TRI-STATE MATERIALS, INC1,601.17 121309 CLASS II BASE & FILL SAND 010-4150-410.21-12 1,601.17 Page 4 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1556694/3/2026 UNIFIRST CORPORATION450.20 2200376601 UNIFORM SERVICES 055-4170-450.21-35 81.43 2200376594 UNIFORM SERVICES 050-9000-450.21-35 143.67 2200379518 UNIFORM SERVICES 050-9000-450.21-35 143.67 2200379530 UNIFORM SERVICES 055-4170-450.21-35 81.43 1556704/3/2026 VIKING MAINTENANCE SERVICE2,217.80 4253726 APRIL 2026 SERVICES 010-7400-425.34-05 155.25 4253726 APRIL 2026 SERVICES 010-2500-425.34-05 1,241.97 4253726 APRIL 2026 SERVICES 010-4200-410.34-05 820.58 1556714/3/2026 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC23,415.10 241432 PRUNING 308-8831-500.34-05 12,486.25 241431 PRUNING 322-8831-500.34-05 7,290.00 241430 PRUNING 367-8831-500.34-05 3,638.85 1556724/3/2026 ANGELICA ZARAGOZA181.67 ZARAGOZA032426 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES 010-2500-425.11-90 181.67 1556734/10/2026 ABM2,896.65 10000683142 CONTRACT BILLING 010-3100-431.34-05 2,896.65 1556744/10/2026 AMERICAN FENCE COMPANY727.31 2693683 T-STAND 010-7100-410.21-12 727.31 1556754/10/2026 AUTOMATED GATE SERVICES, I250.00 102582 SEMI-ANNUAL MAINT SVC 010-3100-431.33-10 250.00 1556764/10/2026 PHIL AYALA148.00 AYALA040626 26-084 MEAL PER DIEM 010-1100-411.31-20 148.00 1556774/10/2026 BAY CITY ELECTRIC WORKS534.98 W327305 PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE 010-3100-431.21-50 534.98 1556784/10/2026 BMW MOTORCYCLES OF RIVERSI1,036.62 6041071 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 024-3100-431.40-45 515.77 6041144 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 024-3100-431.40-45 520.85 1556794/10/2026 CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF CPAS620.00 6914505 FY 26/27 MEMBER RENEWAL 010-1400-414.30-16 103.33 6914505 FY 26/27 MEMBER RENEWAL 010-0000-103.12-34 516.67 1556804/10/2026 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDA887.70 CBSC040126 CBSC FEES JAN-MAR 2026 065-0000-201.09-03 986.33 CBSC040126 CBSC FEES JAN-MAR 2026 010-0000-310.07-96(98.63) 1556814/10/2026 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS421.04 188853601030726 INTERNET SVCS 010-3100-431.34-05 421.04 1556824/10/2026 CISCO'S CUSTOM MASONRY10,310.00 1698 INSTALL FENCE 322-8831-500.34-05 1,785.00 1699 REMOVE & REPLACE WALKWAY 322-8831-500.34-05 1,800.00 1700 REPLACE FENCE 306-8831-500.34-05 3,925.00 1697 INSTALL CARPORT DOOR 010-4200-410.33-10 2,800.00 Page 5 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1556834/10/2026 CLA-VAL, GRISWOLD INDUSTRI5,594.32 940530 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.33-30 3,037.16 940534 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.33-30 2,557.16 1556844/10/2026 COMPLETE TOWING & RECOVERY333.50 6347 BATTERY SERVICE 010-3100-431.33-50 333.50 1556854/10/2026 CRAIG ORONA CONSULTING3,000.00 4 MONTHLY CONSULT SVCS 199-9999-425.40-01 3,000.00 1556864/10/2026 CROSSFLOW DISTRIBUTING, IN186.50 7C210B040826 DRINKING WATER DELIVERY 010-2500-425.21-10 76.00 7C227A040826 DRINKING WATER DELIVERY 010-3100-431.21-10 110.50 1556874/10/2026 CROWN EQUIPMENT CORPORATIO150.00 215079225 PLANNED MAINTENANCE 010-4150-410.33-50 150.00 1556884/10/2026 DAVE'S HAULING CO, INC3,131.77 3272026 VACANT LOT CLEAN UP 186-9700-470.30-90 456.78 3292026A STREETS CLEAN UP 010-4150-410.34-05 635.00 3292026B STREETS CLEAN UP 010-4150-410.34-05 289.00 3242026 CHANNEL CLEAN UP 010-4140-410.34-05 1,370.34 3283036 CHANNEL CLEAN UP 010-4140-410.34-05 380.65 1556894/10/2026 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION2,362.37 DEPTOFCON040126 SMIP FEES JAN-MAR 2026 065-0000-201.08-68 2,486.71 DEPTOFCON040126 SMIP FEES JAN-MAR 2026 010-0000-310.07-96(124.34) 1556904/10/2026 DERRIGO DEMOGRAPHIC STUDIE6,700.00 5100 ANNUAL UPDATE 010-9600-960.34-05 6,700.00 1556914/10/2026 DEWEY PEST CONTROL225.00 18004337 APRIL 2026 SERVICES 010-2500-425.34-05 70.00 18002105 APRIL 2026 SERVICES 034-3200-431.34-05 20.00 18012056 APRIL 2026 SERVICES 034-3200-431.34-05 70.00 18021376 APRIL 2026 SERVICES 010-2500-425.34-05 65.00 1556924/10/2026 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DI96,435.40 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 050-9000-450.35-20 71,661.56 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 010-7100-410.35-10 30.67 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 025-7100-410.35-10 1,023.36 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 025-7250-410.35-10 1,023.44 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 025-7251-410.35-10 762.77 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 025-7252-410.35-10 79.34 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 055-4170-450.35-10 99.25 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 034-3200-431.35-10 319.21 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 301-8831-500.35-10 1,768.57 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 303-8831-500.35-10 574.27 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 304-8831-500.35-10 55.95 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 305-8831-500.35-10 788.34 Page 6 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1556924/10/2026 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DI EMWD040126UTILITY WATER SERVICES 306-8831-500.35-10 294.09 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 307-8831-500.35-10 833.36 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 310-8831-500.35-10 162.00 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 313-8831-500.35-10 1,086.29 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 317-8831-500.35-10 27.73 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 321-8831-500.35-10 640.68 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 326-8831-500.35-10 1,063.37 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 327-8831-500.35-10 795.71 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 331-8831-500.35-10 177.47 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 332-8831-500.35-10 769.44 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 338-8831-500.35-10 1,215.08 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 345-8831-500.35-10 894.24 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 362-8831-500.35-10 170.32 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 363-8831-500.35-10 1,224.41 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 308-8831-500.35-10 747.74 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 311-8831-500.35-10 1,439.54 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 323-8831-500.35-10 304.44 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 325-8831-500.35-10 292.24 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 330-8831-500.35-10 129.61 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 334-8831-500.35-10 39.54 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 339-8831-500.35-10 31.10 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 341-8831-500.35-10 262.74 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 343-8831-500.35-10 1,196.96 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 346-8831-500.35-10 567.33 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 351-8831-500.35-10 204.47 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 353-8831-500.35-10 191.93 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 355-8831-500.35-10 65.59 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 358-8831-500.35-10 108.54 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 359-8831-500.35-10 287.67 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 361-8831-500.35-10 46.28 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 364-8831-500.35-10 23.49 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 365-8831-500.35-10 125.21 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 376-8831-500.35-10 1,774.06 EMWD040126 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 402-8835-500.35-10 1,056.00 1556934/10/2026 EMILIO'S MEXICAN RESTAURAN203.81 INV-000209 REMAINING BAL INV-000209 010-1210-412.36-25 203.81 1556944/10/2026 FIRSTLINE ENVIRONMENTAL SO36,145.73 0326-1756 ENVRNMNTL WASH & DISPOSAL 010-4150-410.34-05 36,145.73 Page 7 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1556954/10/2026 FRONTIER914.73 FRONTIER040826 TELEPHONE SERVICES 010-3100-431.35-16 453.77 FRONTIER040826 TELEPHONE SERVICES 010-6100-425.35-16 72.54 FRONTIER040826 TELEPHONE SERVICES 050-9000-450.35-16 194.21 FRONTIER040826 TELEPHONE SERVICES 055-4170-450.35-16 194.21 1556964/10/2026 GI BUILDERS LLC2,025.00 1280 RESTROOM DRAWINGS 010-2500-425.33-10 700.00 1280 RESTROOM DRAWINGS 010-7400-425.33-10 700.00 1279 RESTROOM REPAIRS 010-2500-425.33-10 625.00 1556974/10/2026 HEMET INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY33.76 67769 SUPPLIES 010-4140-410.21-12 33.76 1556984/10/2026 HEMET VALLEY TOOL913.93 2821-1 SUPPLIES 010-7101-410.33-30 380.63 2759-1 SUPPLIES 010-7101-410.33-30 380.63 QS-1368 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-80 152.67 1556994/10/2026 HERITAGE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY3,831.61 0025467314-003 SUPPLIES 301-8831-500.34-05 482.10 0025617581-001 SUPPLIES 308-8831-500.34-05 3,349.51 1557004/10/2026 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & AS1,163.92 SIN054763 CONTRACT SERVICES 010-2500-425.30-90 1,163.92 1557014/10/2026 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES2,502.35 1690364 SUPPLIES 349-8831-500.34-05 32.29 1732787 SUPPLIES 319-8831-500.34-05 35.21 4014886 SUPPLIES 326-8831-500.34-05 35.31 3021275 SUPPLIES 010-4150-410.21-12 251.88 6340668 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 427.29 5012107 SUPPLIES 010-4150-410.21-12 39.66 4340962 SUPPLIES 343-8831-500.34-05 63.27 7908501 SUPPLIES 034-3200-431.33-10 1,617.44 1557024/10/2026 IRON MOUNTAIN INFORMATION1,081.36 LDZK455 APRIL 2026 STORAGE 010-2500-425.30-90 1,081.36 1557034/10/2026 KARL'S TRACTOR SERVICE1,004.00 7571 SPRING 2026 DISKING 010-7100-410.34-05 1,004.00 1557044/10/2026 LAKE HEMET MUNICIPAL WATER969.21 LHMWD040826 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 322-8831-500.35-10 605.52 LHMWD040826 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 302-8831-500.35-10 76.37 LHMWD040826 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 367-8831-500.35-10 101.86 LHMWD040826 UTILITY WATER SERVICES 367-8831-500.35-10 185.46 1557054/10/2026 LAZ KARP ASSOCIATES, LLC9,890.63 SI1049753 MARCH 2026 FEES 056-4150-410.34-05 9,890.63 Page 8 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1557064/10/2026 TARA MAGNER301.00 MAGNER012026 26-066 MEAL PER DIEM 010-9600-960.31-20 301.00 1557074/10/2026 LORI MATLEY1,000.43 MATLEY031626 26-051 REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSES 011-1700-417.31-20 1,000.43 1557084/10/2026 MINUTEMAN PRESS176.79 84674 190 WEEKLY NOTICES 048-1400-414.36-10 176.79 1557094/10/2026 MULTI W SYSTEMS, INC.69,102.26 32630440 FIELD REPAIRS 304-8831-500.34-05 2,750.00 32630443 STORM WATER PUMP 307-8831-500.34-05 66,352.26 1557104/10/2026 NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC.776.37 58570920 SUPPLIES 010-4150-410.21-14 776.37 1557114/10/2026 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS127.15 5531-224540 SUPPLIES 010-4140-410.21-12 69.56 5531-222185 SUPPLIES 010-7100-410.33-50 57.59 1557124/10/2026 PINS AND NEEDLES EMBROIDER53.02 15915 WORK PUFFER VEST 010-3320-431.21-35 53.02 1557134/10/2026 THOMAS PRILL145.54 PRILL040626 REIMBURSE TUMBLERS 010-1210-412.36-25 145.54 1557144/10/2026 RIGHTWAY SITE SERVICES, IN493.39 453299 RENT 3/24/26-4/20/26 010-4200-410.34-05 493.39 1557154/10/2026 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE6,253.75 PU0000006265 FLEET FUEL 010-4140-410.21-70 517.17 PU0000006265 FLEET FUEL 010-4150-410.21-70 1,623.20 PU0000006265 FLEET FUEL 010-7100-410.21-70 1,508.35 PU0000006265 FLEET FUEL 050-9000-450.21-70 1,891.08 PU0000006265 FLEET FUEL 055-4170-450.21-70 713.95 1557164/10/2026 RIVERSIDE ASSESSOR-COUNTY40.00 CLERK013026 JAN 2026 RECORDATIONS 010-3320-431.30-90 40.00 1557174/10/2026 RIVERSIDE COUNTY INFORMATI608.80 PE0000003366 5 FULL TIME SET 024-3100-431.34-05 608.80 1557184/10/2026 ROMERIL PLUMBING & HARDWAR13.05 20492 SUPPLIES 010-3100-431.21-10 13.05 1557194/10/2026 CRYSTAL RUIZ130.00 RUIZ040626 26-081 MEAL PER DIEM 010-1100-411.31-20 130.00 1557204/10/2026 CLARISA SANCHEZ130.00 SANCHEZ040626 26-082 MEAL PER DIEM 010-1100-411.31-20 130.00 1557214/10/2026 PATRICIA SCOTT101.57 SCOTT033126 26-050 REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSES 011-1700-417.31-20 101.57 Page 9 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1557224/10/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON1,377.44 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 010-7100-410.35-14 9.54 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 025-7260-410.35-14 8.73 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 050-9000-450.35-14 653.59 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 308-8831-500.35-14 29.74 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 311-8831-500.35-14 36.11 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 320-8831-500.35-14 61.50 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 325-8831-500.35-14 9.61 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 327-8831-500.35-14 44.27 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 331-8831-500.35-14 33.28 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 338-8831-500.35-14 7.27 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 339-8831-500.35-14 9.56 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 341-8831-500.35-14 38.27 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 342-8831-500.35-14 11.92 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 343-8831-500.35-14 57.52 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 362-8831-500.35-14 45.87 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 010-4150-410.35-14 203.81 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 010-4150-410.35-14 0.01 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 321-8831-500.35-14 5.44 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 323-8831-500.35-14 5.44 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 343-8831-500.35-14 5.44 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 369-8831-500.35-14 10.89 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 312-8831-500.35-14 5.83 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 321-8831-500.35-14 7.22 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 322-8831-500.35-14 22.75 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 323-8831-500.35-14 7.22 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 334-8831-500.35-14 0.92 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 335-8831-500.35-14 1.05 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 336-8831-500.35-14 1.21 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 337-8831-500.35-14 0.68 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 339-8831-500.35-14 1.33 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 342-8831-500.35-14 0.52 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 343-8831-500.35-14 7.22 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 367-8831-500.35-14 7.58 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 369-8831-500.35-14 14.44 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 380-8831-500.35-14 5.83 SCE040826 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 388-8831-500.35-14 5.83 1557234/10/2026 STAPLES ADVANTAGE24.53 053729LA1008111 SALES TX 1053729LA1008111 010-2500-425.21-10 24.53 Page 10 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1557244/10/2026 SUNRISE AT PARKHILL906.89 Z22-040826 REIMBURSE 50% SCE 322-8831-500.35-14 146.73 Z22-040826 REIMBURSE 50% LHMWD 322-8831-500.35-10 760.16 1557254/10/2026 TRI-STATE MATERIALS, INC2,915.09 121736 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 2,915.09 1557264/10/2026 UNIFIRST CORPORATION738.76 2200382390 FLOOR MATS 010-4200-410.34-05 36.07 2200382410 UNIFORM SVCS 010-7100-410.21-35 105.37 2200382410 UNIFORM SVCS 010-7101-410.21-35 4.57 2200382404 UNIFORM SVCS 010-4140-410.21-35 89.38 2200382401 UNIFORM SVCS 010-4150-410.21-35 133.53 2200379512 FLOOR MATS 010-4200-410.34-05 36.07 2200379526 UNIFORM SVCS 010-4140-410.21-35 90.30 2200379809 UNIFORM SVCS 010-4150-410.21-35 133.53 2200379532 UNIFORM SVCS 010-7100-410.21-35 105.37 2200379532 UNIFORM SVCS 010-7101-410.21-35 4.57 1557274/10/2026 VALERIE VANDEVER148.00 VANDEVER040626 26-083 MEAL PER DIEM 010-1100-411.31-20 148.00 1557284/10/2026 CALMAT CO DBA VULCAN MATER3,145.24 950000867938 SHORT LOAD 025-7100-410.34-05 1,312.62 950000870650 SHORT LOAD 025-7100-410.34-05 1,484.18 5944586 ASPHALT 010-4150-410.21-12 348.44 1557294/10/2026 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC57,627.90 241778 PRUNING 301-8831-500.34-05 12,914.35 241784 PRUNING 332-8831-500.34-05 6,719.30 241785 PRUNING 329-8831-500.34-05 14,698.10 241786 PRUNING 338-8831-500.34-05 8,490.65 241791 PRUNING 320-8831-500.34-05 9,525.60 241796 PRUNING 330-8831-500.34-05 5,279.90 1557304/10/2026 RENE YARNALL215.00 YARNALL012026 26-065 MEAL PER DIEM 010-9600-960.31-20 215.00 1557314/10/2026 YUNEX LLC1,884.60 5610007800 FEB 2026 CALL OUTS 010-4150-410.34-05 1,884.60 1557324/17/2026 AARVIG PENNELL APC137.50 1267854 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT 020-2200-419.30-90 137.50 1557334/17/2026 ADT SECURITY SERVICES44.99 1208089913 ALARM SVCS 010-6100-425.34-05 44.99 1557344/17/2026 AMERICAN FENCE COMPANY176.80 2697753 FENCE RENT 4/11-5/10/26 025-7100-410.34-05 176.80 1557354/17/2026 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES867.00 80191 12 BLOOD DRAWS 010-3100-431.34-05 867.00 Page 11 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1557364/17/2026 AVIWRAPS1,331.97 11214 TREATMENT PLANT DECAL 050-9000-450.30-90 1,331.97 1557374/17/2026 PHIL AYALA83.00 AYALA041326 26-088 MEAL PER DIEM 010-1100-411.31-20 83.00 1557384/17/2026 B & W PIPE & SUPPLY379.01 176755 SUPPLIES 010-7100-410.21-12 34.58 176757 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 54.42 176758 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 85.49 176761 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 186.66 176766 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 17.86 1557394/17/2026 BABCOCK LABORATORIES, INC.2,045.75 CC61996-0278 POLYFLUORINATED SUBSTANCE 050-9000-450.30-90 1,661.07 CD60009-0278 GENERAL ANALYSIS 050-9000-450.30-90 35.40 CD60110-0278 IRON & MANGANESE 050-9000-450.30-90 236.00 CD60190-0278 COLIFORMS BY MMO/MUG&HPC 050-9000-450.30-90 18.88 CD60191-0278 COLIFORMS BY MMO/MUG&HPC 050-9000-450.30-90 94.40 1557404/17/2026 BABYRUTH LEE23.44 WATER032626 REFUND WATER DEPOSIT 050-0000-229.08-70 23.44 1557414/17/2026 BANK OF AMERICA BUSINESS C34,830.19 0108-0426 MAR 2026 PYMT-GANIMIAN 010-2500-425.99-99 236.96 0581-0426 MAR 2026 PYMT-YARNALL 010-2500-425.99-99 1,694.81 1331-0426 MAR 2026 PYMT-MAGNER 010-2500-425.99-99 9,584.37 1392-0426 MAR 2026 PYMT-RANDEL 010-2500-425.99-99 3,116.50 2040-0426 MAR 2026 PYMT-WILLIAMSON 010-2500-425.99-99 2,300.90 2357-0426 MAR 2026 PYMT-WHITE 010-2500-425.99-99 179.78 2400-0426 MAR 2026 PYMT-OSBORN 010-2500-425.99-99 4,124.18 2820-0426 MAR 2026 PYMT-ESPINOSA 010-2500-425.99-99 3,553.14 4440-0426 MAR 2026 PYMT-DAUDERT 010-2500-425.99-99 320.41 4594-0426 MAR 2026 PYMT-PRILL 010-2500-425.99-99 183.00 5351-0426 MAR 2026 PYMT-YANG 010-2500-425.99-99 137.85 6050-0426 MAR 2026 PYMT-SULLENS 010-2500-425.99-99 1,140.47 8728-0426 MAR 2026 PYMT-JOHNSON 010-2500-425.99-99 2,885.05 9240-0426 MAR 2026 PYMT-OLIVARES 010-2500-425.99-99 131.74 9690-0426 MAR 2026 PYMT-ROY 010-2500-425.99-99 5,241.03 1557424/17/2026 BARCO PRODUCTS7,427.66 INVRCO38255 TABLES & BENCHES 331-8831-500.34-05 7,427.66 1557434/17/2026 BELOW ZERO12,000.00 95341 GATE VALVE 050-9000-450.30-90 12,000.00 1557444/17/2026 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES3,107.00 48773 ANALYSIS 010-3100-431.34-05 1,345.00 48774 ANALYSIS 010-3100-431.34-05 1,762.00 Page 12 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1557454/17/2026 BOWMAN SIGNS1,794.38 26001 TRUCK LETTERING 010-4150-410.33-50 299.06 26001 TRUCK LETTERING 010-3320-431.33-50 1,495.32 1557464/17/2026 CAL VALVE INC1,000.09 16406 SUPPLIES 322-8831-500.34-05 166.68 16406 SUPPLIES 025-7250-410.34-05 166.68 16406 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 166.68 16406 SUPPLIES 326-8831-500.34-05 166.68 16406 SUPPLIES 302-8831-500.34-05 166.68 16406 SUPPLIES 331-8831-500.34-05 166.69 1557474/17/2026 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES I2,087.40 43047822 COPIER COPIES 010-4200-410.34-05 319.83 43047822 COPIER COPIES 010-3100-431.34-05 434.41 43047822 COPIER COPIES 010-2500-425.34-05 1,333.16 1557484/17/2026 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS2,099.80 188853701032126 INTERNET SVCS 017-2290-418.34-20 2,099.80 1557494/17/2026 CISCO'S CUSTOM MASONRY4,500.00 1677 INSTALL CONCRETE PAD 025-7100-410.34-05 4,500.00 1557504/17/2026 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTER426.00 90363453 DOY PHYSICAL 010-1210-412.30-90 142.00 90441864 DOY PHYSICAL 010-1210-412.30-90 284.00 1557514/17/2026 SIMON CONTRERAS1,250.81 CONTRERAS033126 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 010-2500-425.31-20 883.85 CONTRERAS041326 REIMBURSE WORK BOOTS 010-4150-410.21-35 366.96 1557524/17/2026 CORE & MAIN LP951.16 Y755408 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 951.21 Y755408 S/B 8.75% SALES & USE TAX 010-0000-201.20-45(8.75) Y803592 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 8.79 Y803592 S/B 8.75% SALES & USE TAX 010-0000-201.20-45(0.09) 1557534/17/2026 CR&R INCORPORATED110.37 290020120040126 SVC PERIOD 4/1/26-6/30/26 010-6500-425.34-05 110.37 1557544/17/2026 CRAFCO INC3,242.16 9403683668 COLD PATCH BULK 050-9000-450.21-12 3,242.16 1557554/17/2026 D.M.C. TREE CARE11,975.00 1142 TREE TRIMMING 010-4150-410.34-05 1,600.00 1143 TREE TRIMMING 010-4150-410.34-05 2,100.00 1144 TREE REMOVAL 010-4150-410.34-05 3,600.00 1146 TREE TRIMMING 010-4150-410.34-05 1,275.00 1147 TREE TRIMMING 010-4150-410.34-05 1,800.00 1149 TREE TRIMMING 010-4150-410.34-05 1,600.00 Page 13 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1557564/17/2026 DAVE'S HAULING CO, INC22,701.05 4122026 CHANNEL CLEAN UP 010-4140-410.34-05 913.56 432026A BASIN CLEAN UP 326-8831-500.34-05 304.52 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 301-8831-500.34-05 69.20 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 307-8831-500.34-05 34.60 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 308-8831-500.34-05 138.40 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 311-8831-500.34-05 380.65 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 313-8831-500.34-05 138.40 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 320-8831-500.34-05 207.65 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 321-8831-500.34-05 103.80 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 322-8831-500.34-05 207.65 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 325-8831-500.34-05 138.40 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 326-8831-500.34-05 138.40 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 327-8831-500.34-05 103.80 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 329-8831-500.34-05 103.80 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 330-8831-500.34-05 138.40 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 331-8831-500.34-05 103.80 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 332-8831-500.34-05 138.40 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 338-8831-500.34-05 224.91 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 341-8831-500.34-05 69.20 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 343-8831-500.34-05 69.20 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 345-8831-500.34-05 138.40 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 346-8831-500.34-05 103.80 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 353-8831-500.34-05 1,373.65 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 355-8831-500.34-05 69.20 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 362-8831-500.34-05 34.60 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 363-8831-500.34-05 173.00 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 367-8831-500.34-05 103.80 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 376-8831-500.34-05 737.10 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 025-7252-410.34-05 34.60 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 025-7252-410.34-05 346.00 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 025-7252-410.34-05 34.60 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 025-7252-410.34-05 34.60 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 025-7100-410.34-05 34.60 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 025-7100-410.34-05 173.00 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 025-7100-410.34-05 1,048.50 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 025-7252-410.34-05 1,345.97 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 025-7100-410.34-05 311.40 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 025-7100-410.34-05 189.18 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 025-7250-410.34-05 242.25 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 010-7100-410.34-05 34.60 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 010-3100-431.34-05 34.60 Page 14 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1557564/17/2026 DAVE'S HAULING CO, INC 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 010-4150-410.34-05 369.12 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 355-8831-500.34-05 179.92 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 303-8831-500.34-05 69.20 412026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 349-8831-500.34-05 34.60 422026 MARCH 2026 PARKS CLEAN UP 010-4150-410.34-05 10,962.72 432026B BASIN CLEAN UP 010-4140-410.34-05 304.52 432026C CHANNEL CLEAN UP 010-4140-410.34-05 456.78 1557574/17/2026 DEVEAU BURR GROUP LLC5,000.00 1514 APR 2026 CONSULT SVCS 199-9999-425.40-01 5,000.00 1557584/17/2026 EMPOWER RETIREMENT, LLC125.00 EMPOWER033126 GROUP #109947 085-0000-202.21-29 125.00 1557594/17/2026 ESGIL-SAFEBUILT, LLC3,429.61 3529335 PROF SVCS MAR 2026 011-3300-431.30-90 3,429.61 1557604/17/2026 FRESH START HOMES LLC146.19 WATER032626 REFUND WATER DEPOSIT 050-0000-229.08-70 146.19 1557614/17/2026 GI BUILDERS LLC20,410.00 1281 INSATLL AUTOMATIC CLOSERS 010-2500-425.33-10 500.00 1282 INSTALL AUTOMATIC CLOSERS 010-4200-410.33-10 820.00 1284 CURB CONSTRUCTION 199-9999-425.40-01 18,565.00 1285 ROLL UP DOOR REPAIR 034-3200-431.33-10 525.00 1557624/17/2026 GLOBAL SAFETY NETWORK57.03 26033121035317 BACKGROUND CHECK 010-1210-412.30-90 57.03 1557634/17/2026 GRAINGER17.35 9860524835 ICE MACHINE SANITIZER 010-4200-410.21-10 17.35 1557644/17/2026 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY174.00 INV32887 SUPPLIES 010-4140-410.21-12 174.00 1557654/17/2026 HEMET VALLEY TOOL2,786.68 QS-1403 SUPPLIES 010-4140-410.21-12 124.90 2773-1 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-80 249.04 QS-1478 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 162.04 2843-1 SUPPLIES 010-7100-410.33-30 96.79 2849-1 SUPPLIES 010-7101-410.33-30 285.47 2895-1 SUPPLIES 010-7101-410.33-30 1,141.88 2918-1 SUPPLIES 010-7100-410.33-30 72.60 2973-1 SUPPLIES 010-7101-410.33-30 380.63 QS-1537 SUPPLIES 010-7100-410.33-30 273.33 1557664/17/2026 HERITAGE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY482.10 0025467314-004 WATER METERS 308-8831-500.34-05 482.10 1557674/17/2026 HI-WAY SAFETY,INC.602.24 184962 PAVEMENT MARKER & EPOXY 010-4150-410.21-12 602.24 Page 15 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1557684/17/2026 HIRSCH PIPE & SUPPLY CO.,805.20 1768753 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 625.84 1777978 SUPPLIES 010-4150-410.21-12 179.36 1557694/17/2026 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES449.94 21641 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 19.59 7012572 SUPPLIES 010-7100-410.21-12 430.35 1557704/17/2026 MISSION SQUARE15,014.96 6404294 CODE CORRECTION 085-0000-202.21-29(668.17) 6404294 CODE CORRECTION 085-0000-202.21-48 668.17 6231465 GROUP #100338 085-0000-202.21-29 7,623.09 6522400 GROUP #300434 085-0000-202.21-29 6,869.98 6522400 GROUP #300434 085-0000-202.21-48 521.89 1557714/17/2026 ILENE ABYAD920.00 ABYAD040826 REIMBURSE CODE FINES 010-0000-304.03-39 920.00 1557724/17/2026 INFOSEND INC.4,518.94 305114 ADDRESS CHANGE SVC 050-1400-414.34-05 6.25 305114 ADDRESS CHANGE SVC 055-1400-414.34-05 6.25 306473 DATA PROCESS/MAIL PREP 050-1400-414.34-05 2,253.22 306473 DATA PROCESS/MAIL PREP 055-1400-414.34-05 2,253.22 1557734/17/2026 INLAND EMPIRE LANDSCAPE, I170,527.37 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 010-7100-410.34-05 1,396.63 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 025-7100-410.34-05 3,868.30 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 025-7250-410.34-05 5,308.26 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 025-7251-410.34-05 1,237.67 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 025-7252-410.34-05 16,997.25 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 050-9000-450.34-05 254.82 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 301-8831-500.34-05 2,926.41 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 302-8831-500.34-05 262.09 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 303-8831-500.34-05 2,201.05 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 305-8831-500.34-05 733.69 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 306-8831-500.34-05 558.16 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 307-8831-500.34-05 3,301.56 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 308-8831-500.34-05 3,326.02 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 309-8831-500.34-05 1,805.54 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 310-8831-500.34-05 262.09 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 311-8831-500.34-05 2,014.24 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 313-8831-500.34-05 3,550.92 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 316-8831-500.34-05 58.24 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 317-8831-500.34-05 72.81 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 319-8831-500.34-05 218.41 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 320-8831-500.34-05 1,826.71 Page 16 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1557734/17/2026 INLAND EMPIRE LANDSCAPE, I 48484MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 321-8831-500.34-05 2,617.48 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 322-8831-500.34-05 1,654.10 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 323-8831-500.34-05 458.55 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 325-8831-500.34-05 580.83 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 326-8831-500.34-05 2,097.11 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 327-8831-500.34-05 2,625.92 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 329-8831-500.34-05 1,283.94 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 330-8831-500.34-05 2,062.77 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 331-8831-500.34-05 473.22 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 332-8831-500.34-05 1,559.07 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 334-8831-500.34-05 582.43 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 338-8831-500.34-05 1,283.94 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 339-8831-500.34-05 174.73 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 340-8831-500.34-05 78.87 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 341-8831-500.34-05 1,184.76 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 343-8831-500.34-05 1,192.24 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 345-8831-500.34-05 1,393.98 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 346-8831-500.34-05 893.70 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 349-8831-500.34-05 2,096.74 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 351-8831-500.34-05 578.39 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 353-8831-500.34-05 22,377.64 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 355-8831-500.34-05 5,362.51 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 358-8831-500.34-05 1,378.32 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 359-8831-500.34-05 822.11 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 361-8831-500.34-05 990.99 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 362-8831-500.34-05 526.61 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 363-8831-500.34-05 3,698.98 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 364-8831-500.34-05 141.97 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 365-8831-500.34-05 371.12 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 367-8831-500.34-05 436.82 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 368-8831-500.34-05 56.79 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 376-8831-500.34-05 1,525.45 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 386-8831-500.34-05 303.35 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 388-8831-500.34-05 145.61 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 402-8835-500.34-05 23,142.61 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 409-8835-500.34-05 7,597.41 48484 MAINTENANCE MARCH 2026 410-8835-500.34-05 6,785.22 48457 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 010-7100-410.34-05 135.47 48457 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 025-7100-410.34-05 677.89 48457 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 025-7250-410.34-05 601.27 48457 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 025-7251-410.34-05 1,981.07 48457 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 025-7252-410.34-05 1,420.77 Page 17 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1557734/17/2026 INLAND EMPIRE LANDSCAPE, I48457 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 302-8831-500.34-05 5.89 48457 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 309-8831-500.34-05 35.34 48457 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 310-8831-500.34-05 23.56 48457 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 320-8831-500.34-05 35.34 48457 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 322-8831-500.34-05 565.97 48457 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 331-8831-500.34-05 383.22 48457 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 367-8831-500.34-05 17.69 48457 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 409-8835-500.34-05 153.09 48457 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 410-8835-500.34-05 29.45 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 025-7100-410.34-05 260.76 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 301-8831-500.34-05 512.90 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 305-8831-500.34-05 282.96 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 306-8831-500.34-05 5.89 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 307-8831-500.34-05 324.23 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 308-8831-500.34-05 766.41 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 311-8831-500.34-05 182.70 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 313-8831-500.34-05 265.23 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 321-8831-500.34-05 601.13 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 323-8831-500.34-05 5.89 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 325-8831-500.34-05 117.89 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 326-8831-500.34-05 2,028.15 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 327-8831-500.34-05 123.78 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 329-8831-500.34-05 200.41 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 330-8831-500.34-05 296.55 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 332-8831-500.34-05 159.12 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 338-8831-500.34-05 483.34 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 341-8831-500.34-05 206.36 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 343-8831-500.34-05 536.38 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 345-8831-500.34-05 1,002.20 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 346-8831-500.34-05 188.66 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 349-8831-500.34-05 53.01 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 351-8831-500.34-05 619.07 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 353-8831-500.34-05 168.83 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 355-8831-500.34-05 492.76 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 359-8831-500.34-05 241.70 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 362-8831-500.34-05 70.74 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 363-8831-500.34-05 389.07 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 365-8831-500.34-05 11.78 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 376-8831-500.34-05 648.44 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 386-8831-500.34-05 130.74 48458 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 402-8835-500.34-05 367.12 Page 18 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1557744/17/2026 INNOVATIVE GROWTH LANDSCAP17,002.61 342 WEED ABATEMENT 402-8835-500.34-05 2,587.00 341 WEED ABATEMENT 402-8835-500.34-05 1,431.45 352 PLANT & TREE INSTALL 313-8831-500.34-05 5,161.00 353 WEED ABATEMENT 376-8831-500.34-05 7,823.16 1557754/17/2026 INTEGRITY LANDSCAPE CONSTR5,700.00 ILC032426 INSTALL CURB WITH REBAR 025-7100-410.34-05 5,700.00 1557764/17/2026 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP102,187.84 3535683 PROF SVC FEB 2026 065-0000-201.06-47 19,556.30 3535698 PROF SVC FEB 2026 065-0000-201.06-47 3,787.73 3535700 PROF SVC FEB 2026 065-0000-201.06-47 375.88 3535701 PROF SVC FEB 2026 065-0000-201.06-47 321.30 3397510 PROF SVCS FEB 2026 199-9999-425.40-01 239.75 3398036 PROF SVCS FEB 2026 010-4100-410.30-90 22,679.50 3399923 PROF SVCS FEB 2026 199-9999-425.40-01 25,022.25 3400739 PROF SVCS FEB 2026 199-9999-425.40-01 540.75 3403902 PROF SVCS FEB 2026 011-4100-410.30-90 5,040.00 3441091 PROF SVCS FEB 2026 010-4140-410.34-06 4,122.00 3479481 PROF SVCS FEB 2026 199-9999-425.40-01 34.25 3480397 PROF SVCS FEB 2026 199-9999-425.40-01 34.25 3481177 PROF SVCS FEB 2026 199-9999-425.40-01 68.50 3725816 PROF SVCS MAR 2026 065-0000-201.06-47 3,580.36 3725817 PROF SVCS MAR 2026 065-0000-201.06-47 14,350.30 3725818 PROF SVCS MAR 2026 065-0000-201.06-47 2,434.72 1557774/17/2026 JAMES CASE11.39 WATER032626 REFUND WATER DEPOSIT 050-0000-229.08-70 11.39 1557784/17/2026 JAV ELECTRIC1,033.00 9160 JUNCTION BX & WIRE REPAIR 025-7100-410.34-05 1,033.00 1557794/17/2026 MANPOWER1,297.68 5137110 W/E 3/29/26 010-1210-412.34-05 1,297.68 1557804/17/2026 LORI MATLEY301.00 MATLEY041026 26-068 MEAL PER DIEM 011-1700-417.31-20 301.00 1557814/17/2026 MAYKEL RODRIGUEZ160.97 WATER032626 REFUND WATER DEPOSIT 050-0000-229.08-70 160.97 1557824/17/2026 MULTI W SYSTEMS, INC.1,000.00 32630482 DATA PLAN-BASIN ZONE 31 331-8831-500.34-05 1,000.00 Page 19 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1557834/17/2026 NBS49,747.22 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 701-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 702-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 703-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 704-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 705-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 706-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 707-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 708-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 709-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 710-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 711-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 712-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 713-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 714-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 715-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 716-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 717-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 718-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 719-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 720-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 721-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 723-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 724-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 728-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 730-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 732-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 733-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 734-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 735-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 736-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 736-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 737-4150-500.30-90 231.67 202603-1528 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 739-4150-500.30-90 380.30 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 201-8850-500.30-90 1,215.14 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 045-8800-450.30-90 3,866.46 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 402-8835-500.34-05 1,071.11 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 401-8835-500.34-05 1,004.91 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 034-8850-500.30-90 4,047.24 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 403-8835-500.34-05 167.92 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 404-8835-500.34-05 167.89 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 405-8835-500.34-05 167.89 Page 20 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1557834/17/2026 NBS 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 406-8835-500.34-05 167.89 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 407-8835-500.34-05 167.89 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 408-8835-500.34-05 167.89 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 409-8835-500.34-05 167.89 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 410-8835-500.34-05 167.89 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 412-8835-500.34-05 167.89 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 415-8835-500.34-05 167.89 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 413-8835-500.34-05 167.89 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 417-8835-500.34-05 167.89 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 418-8835-500.34-05 167.89 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 400-0000-229.07-00 167.89 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 400-0000-229.07-00 167.89 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 400-0000-229.07-00 167.89 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 400-0000-229.07-00 167.89 202603-1530 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 400-0000-229.07-00 167.89 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 301-8831-500.30-90 1,023.56 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 302-8831-500.30-90 363.84 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 303-8831-500.30-90 275.88 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 304-8831-500.30-90 147.94 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 305-8831-500.30-90 259.89 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 306-8831-500.30-90 263.89 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 307-8831-500.30-90 995.57 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 308-8831-500.30-90 1,347.42 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 309-8831-500.30-90 887.62 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 310-8831-500.30-90 707.69 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 311-8831-500.30-90 503.78 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 312-8831-500.30-90 11.99 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 313-8831-500.30-90 679.71 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 314-8831-500.30-90 4.00 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 315-8831-500.30-90 4.00 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 316-8831-500.30-90 75.97 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 317-8831-500.30-90 119.95 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 318-8831-500.30-90 11.99 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 319-8831-500.30-90 31.99 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 319-8832-500.30-90 8.00 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 320-8831-500.30-90 531.77 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 321-8831-500.30-90 583.75 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 322-8831-500.30-90 535.77 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 323-8831-500.30-90 327.86 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 324-8831-500.30-90 4.00 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 325-8831-500.30-90 411.82 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 326-8831-500.30-90 1,179.49 Page 21 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1557834/17/2026 NBS 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 327-8831-500.30-90 1,051.54 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 328-8831-500.30-90 8.00 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 329-8831-500.30-90 571.75 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 330-8831-500.30-90 351.85 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 331-8831-500.30-90 243.89 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 332-8831-500.30-90 523.77 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 333-8831-500.30-90 411.82 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 334-8831-500.30-90 255.89 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 335-8831-500.30-90 291.87 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 336-8831-500.30-90 335.85 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 337-8831-500.30-90 187.92 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 338-8831-500.30-90 783.66 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 339-8831-500.30-90 367.84 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 340-8831-500.30-90 51.98 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 341-8831-500.30-90 363.84 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 342-8831-500.30-90 143.94 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 343-8831-500.30-90 811.65 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 345-8831-500.30-90 1,011.56 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 346-8831-500.30-90 559.76 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 348-8831-500.30-90 4.00 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 349-8831-500.30-90 371.84 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 351-8831-500.30-90 39.98 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 352-8831-500.30-90 35.98 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 353-8831-500.30-90 431.81 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 354-8831-500.30-90 4.00 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 355-8831-500.30-90 551.76 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 358-8831-500.30-90 207.91 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 359-8831-500.30-90 23.99 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 361-8831-500.30-90 147.94 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 362-8831-500.30-90 227.90 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 363-8831-500.30-90 463.80 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 364-8831-500.30-90 19.99 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 365-8831-500.30-90 115.95 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 366-8831-500.30-90 87.96 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 367-8831-500.30-90 139.94 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 368-8831-500.30-90 39.98 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 373-8831-500.30-90 4.00 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 375-8831-500.30-90 8.00 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 376-8831-500.30-90 1,283.44 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 385-8831-500.30-90 4.00 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 386-8831-500.30-90 11.99 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 388-8831-500.30-90 4.00 Page 22 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1557834/17/2026 NBS 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 390-8831-500.30-90 4.00 202603-1531 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 391-8831-500.30-90 3.99 202603-1532 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 025-7250-410.30-90 772.18 202603-1532 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 025-7251-410.30-90 772.18 202603-1532 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 025-7252-410.30-90 772.18 202603-1532 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 025-7260-410.30-90 772.18 202603-1532 PROF SVC 4/1/26-6/30/26 025-7100-410.30-90 772.18 1557844/17/2026 NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC.3,680.32 58600712 SUPPLIES 010-4140-410.21-14 255.22 58585841 SUPPLIES 010-4150-410.21-14 2,376.25 58586121 SUPPLIES 010-4150-410.21-14 1,048.85 1557854/17/2026 OMEGA INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES782.31 169046 NITRILE GLOVES 055-4170-450.21-35 782.31 1557864/17/2026 ONLINE INFORMATION SERVICE150.24 1380103 UTILITY EXCHANGE REPORT 050-1400-414.34-05 75.12 1380103 UTILITY EXCHANGE REPORT 055-1400-414.34-05 75.12 1557874/17/2026 OPTERRA ENERGY SERVICES, L3,084.92 90081184 M&V FEES FEB 2026 050-9000-450.34-05 455.50 90081185 O&M FEES FEB 2026 050-9000-450.34-05 2,629.42 1557884/17/2026 OVERNIGHT INDUSTRIAL SUPPL217.07 1289 SUPPLIES 010-4200-410.21-10 217.07 1557894/17/2026 PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORAT137,994.29 22 WORK COMPLETED 199-9999-425.40-01 145,257.15 22 WORK COMPLETED 199-9999-425.40-01(145,257.15) 22 WORK COMPLETED 199-9999-425.40-01 145,257.15 22 RETENTION WITHHELD 199-0000-210.20-25(7,262.86) 1557904/17/2026 PAYNE PEST MANAGEMENT INC690.00 236940B SEMI-MONTHLY SVC 343-8831-500.34-05 350.00 436539 MONTHLY SVC 353-8831-500.34-05 85.00 436540 MONTHLY SVC 376-8831-500.34-05 85.00 436541 MONTHLY SVC 025-7100-410.34-05 85.00 436542 MONTHLY SVC 025-7252-410.34-05 85.00 1557914/17/2026 THE PRESS ENTERPRISE2,135.06 639659 LEGAL ADVERTISING 065-0000-211.21-02 867.14 639659 LEGAL ADVERTISING 010-1110-411.36-25 977.73 639659 LEGAL ADVERTISING 011-1700-417.36-25 290.19 1557924/17/2026 TRAVIS RANDEL387.00 RANDEL091625 26-041 MEAL PER DIEM 011-1700-417.31-20 387.00 1557934/17/2026 REAL ESTATE RECOVERY INC67.87 WATER032626 REFUND WATER DEPOSIT 050-0000-229.08-70 67.87 Page 23 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1557944/17/2026 RIGHTWAY SITE SERVICES, IN114.83 453340 RENT 3/25/26-4/21/26 010-3100-431.34-05 114.83 1557954/17/2026 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE462.63 TL0000018147 NEW SIGNAL INSTALL 010-4150-410.32-05 462.63 1557964/17/2026 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CON17,333.81 FC021135 COST SHARING/SANTA ANA 010-4140-410.34-06 17,333.81 1557974/17/2026 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF D1,370,318.87 SH0000050126 CONTRACT LAW BP #8 010-3100-431.34-04 1,226,686.97 SH0000050126 CONTRACT LAW BP #8 010-3100-431.34-06 22,069.63 SH0000050126 CONTRACT LAW BP #8 034-3100-431.34-04 121,562.27 1557984/17/2026 ROBERTSON INDUSTRIES, INC72,002.00 PJI-018314 PLAYGROUND SURFACING 363-8831-500.34-05 68,652.00 PJI-018315 ROLL COAT & REPAIRS 338-8831-500.34-05 3,350.00 1557994/17/2026 JEFFREY ROBINSON1,364.00 ROBINSON033126 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 010-2500-425.31-20 1,364.00 1558004/17/2026 ROMERIL PLUMBING & HARDWAR573.66 20526 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 25.31 20526 SUPPLIES 373-8831-500.34-05 21.72 20519 SUPPLIES 010-7100-410.21-12 105.42 20519 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 64.60 20513 SUPPLIES 010-7101-410.21-12 50.00 20505 SUPPLIES 010-7100-410.21-12 120.74 20505 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 14.36 20504 SUPPLIES 010-4150-410.21-12 93.50 20518 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 78.01 1558014/17/2026 ROTO-ROOTER PLUMBERS820.00 1930560532 PARK DRAINAGE REPAIRS 025-7100-410.34-05 820.00 1558024/17/2026 ROYAL TRUCK BODY668.52 0226678-IN PICKUP BED REMOVAL 010-7100-410.33-50 668.52 1558034/17/2026 CRYSTAL RUIZ83.00 RUIZ041326 26-090 MEAL PER DIEM 010-1100-411.31-20 83.00 1558044/17/2026 RYCONN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT388.44 WATER032626 REFUND WATER DEPOSIT 050-0000-229.08-70 85.07 WATER032626 REFUND WATER DEPOSIT 050-0000-229.08-70 303.37 1558054/17/2026 CLARISA SANCHEZ83.00 SANCHEZ041326 26-087 MEAL PER DIEM 010-1100-411.31-20 83.00 1558064/17/2026 SHARPLINE SOLUTIONS, INC1,853.67 4553 TRAFFIC PAINT 010-4150-410.21-12 1,853.67 1558074/17/2026 SOM PROGRAM2,000.00 SOM041526 SPONSORSHIP 26/27 YEAR 010-2510-425.40-13 2,000.00 Page 24 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1558084/17/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON72,053.28 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 010-2500-425.35-14 2,173.21 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 010-2500-414.36-97 25.33 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 010-3100-431.35-14 2,373.20 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 010-4150-410.35-14 3,312.40 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 010-4200-410.35-14 1,217.97 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 010-7100-410.35-14 65.77 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 010-7400-425.35-14 1,931.62 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 025-7100-410.35-14 297.08 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 025-7250-410.35-14 739.34 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 025-7251-410.35-14 16.26 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 025-7252-410.35-14 947.27 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 025-7260-410.35-14 22,526.31 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 034-3200-431.35-14 121.70 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 050-9000-450.35-14 157.62 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 055-4170-450.35-14 340.76 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 065-0000-201.06-06 10.16 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 201-8850-500.35-14 223.01 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 301-8831-500.35-14 166.10 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 302-8831-500.35-14 15.66 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 303-8831-500.35-14 31.55 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 304-8831-500.35-14 108.76 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 305-8831-500.35-14 31.85 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 306-8831-500.35-14 154.24 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 307-8831-500.35-14 809.70 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 308-8831-500.35-14 204.83 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 309-8831-500.35-14 78.55 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 311-8831-500.35-14 67.66 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 313-8831-500.35-14 34.01 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 316-8831-500.35-14 15.91 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 317-8831-500.35-14 15.64 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 320-8831-500.35-14 71.47 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 321-8831-500.35-14 23.05 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 322-8831-500.35-14 36.22 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 323-8831-500.35-14 46.06 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 325-8831-500.35-14 31.49 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 326-8831-500.35-14 372.70 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 327-8831-500.35-14 715.02 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 329-8831-500.35-14 120.10 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 330-8831-500.35-14 64.86 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 331-8831-500.35-14 49.16 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 332-8831-500.35-14 47.74 Page 25 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1558084/17/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 338-8831-500.35-14 109.54 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 339-8831-500.35-14 15.49 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 341-8831-500.35-14 59.49 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 342-8831-500.35-14 24.55 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 343-8831-500.35-14 103.94 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 345-8831-500.35-14 516.36 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 346-8831-500.35-14 15.92 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 349-8831-500.35-14 258.24 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 351-8831-500.35-14 259.94 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 353-8831-500.35-14 52.15 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 355-8831-500.35-14 40.17 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 358-8831-500.35-14 16.99 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 359-8831-500.35-14 15.92 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 361-8831-500.35-14 15.92 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 362-8831-500.35-14 144.74 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 363-8831-500.35-14 17.92 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 365-8831-500.35-14 18.79 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 368-8831-500.35-14 15.94 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 376-8831-500.35-14 1,586.43 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 402-8835-500.35-14 759.34 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 309-8831-500.35-14 19.74 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 301-8831-500.35-14 321.50 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 304-8831-500.35-14 60.13 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 317-8831-500.35-14 45.17 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 321-8831-500.35-14 15.49 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 334-8831-500.35-14 154.82 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 348-8831-500.35-14 30.24 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 349-8831-500.35-14 21.13 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 359-8831-500.35-14 80.53 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 376-8831-500.35-14 420.76 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 332-8831-500.35-14 289.81 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 346-8831-500.35-14 525.97 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 310-8831-500.35-14 103.22 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 010-4150-410.35-14 10,598.57 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 010-4150-410.35-14(20.95) SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 010-4150-410.35-14 50.20 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 025-7260-410.35-14 1,188.16 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 025-7260-410.35-14 1,500.00 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 301-8831-500.35-14 92.93 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 302-8831-500.35-14 95.34 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 303-8831-500.35-14 274.42 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 305-8831-500.35-14 188.92 Page 26 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1558084/17/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 306-8831-500.35-14 113.62 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 307-8831-500.35-14 326.16 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 308-8831-500.35-14 525.24 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 309-8831-500.35-14 305.89 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 310-8831-500.35-14 144.84 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 311-8831-500.35-14 179.82 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 312-8831-500.35-14 7.62 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 313-8831-500.35-14 511.62 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 314-8831-500.35-14 5.07 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 315-8831-500.35-14 39.60 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 316-8831-500.35-14 22.49 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 319-8831-500.35-14 114.72 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 319-8832-500.35-14 31.64 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 320-8831-500.35-14 244.62 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 321-8831-500.35-14 150.36 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 322-8831-500.35-14 298.59 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 323-8831-500.35-14 163.81 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 324-8831-500.35-14 30.24 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 325-8831-500.35-14 251.00 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 326-8831-500.35-14 455.87 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 327-8831-500.35-14 378.17 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 329-8831-500.35-14 263.66 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 330-8831-500.35-14 173.33 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 331-8831-500.35-14 77.85 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 332-8831-500.35-14 120.86 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 333-8831-500.35-14 59.18 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 334-8831-500.35-14 2.50 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 335-8831-500.35-14 37.79 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 336-8831-500.35-14 10.60 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 337-8831-500.35-14 86.29 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 338-8831-500.35-14 263.50 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 339-8831-500.35-14 59.01 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 340-8831-500.35-14 57.89 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 341-8831-500.35-14 142.43 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 342-8831-500.35-14 51.72 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 343-8831-500.35-14 343.96 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 345-8831-500.35-14 404.01 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 346-8831-500.35-14 243.33 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 347-8831-500.35-14 114.18 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 349-8831-500.35-14 92.49 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 350-8831-500.35-14 34.16 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 351-8831-500.35-14 112.84 Page 27 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1558084/17/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 352-8831-500.35-14 6.58 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 353-8831-500.35-14 89.18 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 354-8831-500.35-14 34.58 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 357-8831-500.35-14 27.82 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 358-8831-500.35-14 281.33 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 359-8831-500.35-14 152.77 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 360-8831-500.35-14 127.78 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 361-8831-500.35-14 209.00 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 362-8831-500.35-14 138.10 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 365-8831-500.35-14 48.99 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 366-8831-500.35-14 45.06 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 367-8831-500.35-14 77.54 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 368-8831-500.35-14 12.47 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 369-8831-500.35-14 56.92 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 371-8831-500.35-14 39.60 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 373-8831-500.35-14 52.24 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 374-8831-500.35-14 28.33 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 375-8831-500.35-14 40.37 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 375-8831-500.35-14 40.37 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 376-8831-500.35-14 356.56 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 383-8831-500.35-14 5.08 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 386-8831-500.35-14 47.16 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 388-8831-500.35-14 11.25 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 389-8831-500.35-14 9.14 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 390-8831-500.35-14 20.07 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 390-8831-500.35-14 20.07 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 391-8831-500.35-14 31.67 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 403-8835-500.35-14 15.47 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 409-8835-500.35-14 328.45 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 402-8835-500.35-14 538.88 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 301-8831-500.35-14 85.44 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 304-8831-500.35-14 10.23 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 308-8831-500.35-14 37.93 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 309-8831-500.35-14 39.35 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 310-8831-500.35-14 4.37 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 312-8831-500.35-14 31.45 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 315-8831-500.35-14 30.50 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 318-8831-500.35-14 10.10 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 319-8832-500.35-14 94.63 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 321-8831-500.35-14 38.47 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 322-8831-500.35-14 129.61 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 323-8831-500.35-14 38.47 Page 28 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1558084/17/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 324-8831-500.35-14 10.10 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 327-8831-500.35-14 34.94 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 330-8831-500.35-14 36.79 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 333-8831-500.35-14 2.54 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 334-8831-500.35-14 6.57 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 335-8831-500.35-14 7.49 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 336-8831-500.35-14 8.62 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 337-8831-500.35-14 4.82 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 339-8831-500.35-14 9.44 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 340-8831-500.35-14 37.93 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 342-8831-500.35-14 3.69 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 343-8831-500.35-14 38.47 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 345-8831-500.35-14 43.37 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 346-8831-500.35-14 81.30 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 347-8831-500.35-14 96.91 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 349-8831-500.35-14 36.05 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 350-8831-500.35-14 34.94 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 351-8831-500.35-14 122.42 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 353-8831-500.35-14 127.08 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 354-8831-500.35-14 30.50 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 357-8831-500.35-14 37.93 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 359-8831-500.35-14 242.05 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 360-8831-500.35-14 57.42 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 366-8831-500.35-14 36.79 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 367-8831-500.35-14 43.20 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 369-8831-500.35-14 76.94 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 371-8831-500.35-14 30.50 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 372-8831-500.35-14 10.10 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 373-8831-500.35-14 30.50 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 374-8831-500.35-14 70.84 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 375-8831-500.35-14 40.46 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 376-8831-500.35-14 34.94 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 380-8831-500.35-14 31.45 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 383-8831-500.35-14 10.10 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 385-8831-500.35-14 60.10 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 386-8831-500.35-14 43.37 SCE041326 ELECTRICITY SERVICES 388-8831-500.35-14 31.45 1558094/17/2026 SOUTHERN HILL NURSERY, INC2,728.54 3144 LANDSCAPING PLANTS 025-7100-410.34-05 2,728.54 Page 29 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1558104/17/2026 SSD ALARM825.32 R-00652260 MAY 2026 SVCS 050-9000-450.34-05 238.03 R-00652260 MAY 2026 SVCS 010-4200-410.34-05 270.36 R-00652260 MAY 2026 SVCS 010-2500-425.34-05 160.47 R-00652260 MAY 2026 SVCS 010-3100-431.34-05 156.46 1558114/17/2026 STAPLES ADVANTAGE3,875.32 6059546093 CREDIT INV #6060441610 050-1400-414.21-10(47.95) 6059546094 SUPPLIES 010-1200-412.21-10 15.52 6059546094 SUPPLIES 010-2500-425.21-10 24.88 6059546095 SUPPLIES 010-9600-960.21-10 791.18 6059546096 SUPPLIES 010-3320-431.21-10 14.85 6059546096 SUPPLIES 010-2500-425.21-10 24.84 6060441611 SUPPLIES 010-2500-425.21-10 213.37 6060441611 SUPPLIES 010-3320-431.21-10 28.96 6060441611 SUPPLIES 011-3300-431.21-10 28.95 6060441609 SUPPLIES 010-4200-410.21-10 15.20 6060441610 SUPPLIES 010-4200-410.21-10 72.78 6060867578 SUPPLIES 010-2500-425.21-10 417.39 6060867579 SUPPLIES 010-3100-431.21-10 2,275.35 1558124/17/2026 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT O140.00 34808 BA ANALYSIS 010-3100-431.34-05 140.00 1558134/17/2026 TALLEY METAL SUPPLY225.42 122478 SUPPLIES 309-8831-500.34-05 60.80 122480 SUPPLIES 309-8831-500.34-05 6.49 123043 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 11.31 123154 SUPPLIES 338-8831-500.34-05 76.67 123232 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 70.15 1558144/17/2026 THE COMMUNITY BUILDING GRO158.61 WATER032626 REFUND WATER DEPOSIT 050-0000-229.08-70 158.61 1558154/17/2026 THE ROVISYS COMPANY14,385.77 111070 SCADA UPGRADE PROJECT 199-9999-425.40-01 14,385.77 1558164/17/2026 THOMSON REUTERS-WEST PAYME269.23 853438295 SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION 010-3100-431.34-05 269.23 1558174/17/2026 TONY'S TIRES35.00 TT040626 TIRE PATCHING 050-9000-450.33-50 35.00 1558184/17/2026 TRI-STATE MATERIALS, INC4,975.63 121909 SUPPLIES 025-7100-410.34-05 4,975.63 Page 30 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1558194/17/2026 ULINE2,229.31 206335092 TRASH LINERS 025-7252-410.34-05 111.46 206335092 TRASH LINERS 025-7100-410.34-05 111.46 206335092 TRASH LINERS 353-8831-500.34-05 111.46 206335092 TRASH LINERS 355-8831-500.34-05 111.46 206335092 TRASH LINERS 301-8831-500.34-05 111.46 206335092 TRASH LINERS 311-8831-500.34-05 111.46 206335092 TRASH LINERS 326-8831-500.34-05 111.46 206335092 TRASH LINERS 320-8831-500.34-05 111.46 206335092 TRASH LINERS 321-8831-500.34-05 111.46 206335092 TRASH LINERS 376-8831-500.34-05 111.46 206335092 TRASH LINERS 327-8831-500.34-05 111.46 206335092 TRASH LINERS 322-8831-500.34-05 111.46 206335092 TRASH LINERS 331-8831-500.34-05 111.46 206335092 TRASH LINERS 345-8831-500.34-05 111.46 206335092 TRASH LINERS 346-8831-500.34-05 111.46 206335092 TRASH LINERS 363-8831-500.34-05 111.46 206335092 TRASH LINERS 402-8835-500.34-05 111.46 206335092 TRASH LINERS 409-8835-500.34-05 111.46 206335092 TRASH LINERS 308-8831-500.34-05 111.66 206335092 TRASH LINERS 313-8831-500.34-05 111.37 1558204/17/2026 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT267.45 25-263386 REGULATORY COSTS 050-9000-450.34-05 55.35 320260706 TICKETING SERVICES 050-9000-450.34-05 212.10 1558214/17/2026 UNIFIRST CORPORATION855.19 2200382396 UNIFORM SERVICES 050-9000-450.21-35 143.67 2200382408 UNIFORM SERVICES 055-4170-450.21-35 81.43 2200385068 UNIFORM SERVICES 055-4170-450.21-35 81.43 2200385432 UNIFORM SERVICES 050-9000-450.21-35 143.67 2200385056 FLOOR MATS 010-4200-410.34-05 36.07 2200385062 UNIFORMS SVCS 010-4150-410.21-35 133.53 2200385066 UNIFORM SVCS 010-4140-410.21-35 89.38 2200385070 UNIFORM SVCS 010-7100-410.21-35 105.37 2200385070 UNIFORM SVCS 010-7101-410.21-35 4.57 2200387928 FLOOR MATS 010-4200-410.34-05 36.07 1558224/17/2026 VALERIE VANDEVER83.00 VANDEVER041326 MEAL PER DIEM 010-1100-411.31-20 83.00 1558234/17/2026 VELASCO MATERIALS, INC112.50 11145 BLACK WOODCHIPS 025-7100-410.34-05 112.50 Page 31 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1558244/17/2026 CALMAT CO DBA VULCAN MATER1,209.19 6057877 ASPHALT 010-4150-410.21-12 240.87 6058322 ASPHALT 010-4150-410.21-12 240.87 6099790 ASPHALT 010-4150-410.21-12 242.08 6118439 ASPHALT 010-4150-410.21-12 485.37 1558254/17/2026 WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC133,168.25 242070 PRUNING 343-8831-500.34-05 11,558.70 242071 PRUNING 325-8831-500.34-05 5,382.25 242072 PRUNING 311-8831-500.34-05 7,406.95 242218 PRUNING 376-8831-500.34-05 25,264.85 242219 PRUNING 402-8835-500.34-05 35,590.85 242220-A PRUNING 410-8835-500.34-05 8,847.40 242222 PRUNING 010-7100-410.34-05 2,283.20 242258 PRUNING 309-8831-500.34-05 5,837.25 242261 PRUNING 313-8831-500.34-05 4,637.75 242263 PRUNING 307-8831-500.34-05 7,801.95 242265 PRUNING 326-8831-500.34-05 11,558.70 242266 PRUNING 303-8831-500.34-05 6,998.40 1558264/17/2026 WHITE CAP, LP613.23 50036197601 SUPPLIES 010-4150-410.21-12 613.23 1558274/17/2026 KEVIN WHITE1,006.52 WHITE091625 26-042 MEAL PER DIEM 011-1700-417.31-20 387.00 WHITE021926 26-069 MEAL PER DIEM 011-1700-417.31-20 301.00 WHITE033126 REIMBURSE LOAN REPAYMENT 010-0000-300.99-99 318.52 1558284/17/2026 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES730.00 010-65518 WTR & RATE STDY FEB 2026 050-1400-414.34-05 365.00 010-65518 WTR & RATE STDY FEB 2026 055-1400-414.34-05 365.00 1558294/17/2026 WREGIS125.00 WR58349 ANNUAL FEE 048-1400-414.34-05 125.00 1558304/17/2026 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC.6,760.96 11692 TRAFFIC SAFETY SIGNS 024-4150-410.21-36 6,760.96 1558314/24/2026 BABCOCK LABORATORIES, INC.453.28 CD60538-0278 COLIFORMS BY MMO/MUG&HPC 050-9000-450.30-90 94.40 CD60539-0278 COLIFORMS BY MMO/MUG&HPC 050-9000-450.30-90 18.88 CD60632-0278 IRON & MANGANESE 050-9000-450.30-90 200.00 CD60879-0278 COLIFORMS BY MMO/MUG&HPC 050-9000-450.30-90 20.00 CD60880-0278 COLIFORMS BY MMO/MUG&HPC 050-9000-450.30-90 100.00 CD60882-0278 COLIFORMS BY MMO/MUG&HPC 050-9000-450.30-90 20.00 1558324/24/2026 BENEFIT COORDINATORS CORPO7,105.24 18700 GROUP #EIA00093 085-0000-202.21-46 6,526.59 18700 GROUP #EIA00093 085-0000-202.21-52 578.65 Page 32 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1558334/24/2026 BEST BEST & KRIEGER, LLP40,336.85 1058549 SVCS THROUGH 3/31/26 010-1111-411.30-90 20,754.00 1058550 SVCS THROUGH 3/31/26 010-3320-431.30-90 1,915.80 1058551 SVCS THROUGH 3/31/26 065-0000-211.21-32 6,852.30 1058552 SVCS THROUGH 3/31/26 010-1111-411.30-90 325.50 1058553 SVCS THROUGH 3/31/26 199-9999-425.40-01 4,018.45 1058554 SVCS THROUGH 3/31/26 199-9999-425.40-01 436.80 1058555 SVCS THROUGH 3/31/26 199-9999-425.40-01 77.50 1058556 SVCS THROUGH 3/31/26 065-0000-211.21-01 5,956.50 1558344/24/2026 JIM CASH295.00 CASH040726 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES 010-2500-425.11-90 295.00 1558354/24/2026 ISAURO CASTILLO-CALDERON155.00 CASTILLO040726 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES 010-2500-425.11-90 155.00 1558364/24/2026 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS421.04 188853601040726 INTERNET SVCS 010-3100-431.34-05 421.04 1558374/24/2026 COMMERCE TRUCK & EQUIPMENT1,025.38 14680 SUPPLIES 010-4150-410.33-50 1,025.38 1558384/24/2026 CORE & MAIN LP7,250.35 Y842281 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 511.52 Y842281 S/B 8.75% SALES & TAX USE 010-0000-201.20-45(4.71) Y863638 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 6,806.13 Y863638 S/B 8.75% SALES & USE TAX 010-0000-201.20-45(62.59) 1558394/24/2026 DENISE CUEVAS20.00 CUEVAS040726 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES 010-2500-425.11-90 20.00 1558404/24/2026 D.M.C. TREE CARE5,700.00 1152 TREE TRIMMING 010-4150-410.34-05 1,300.00 1153 TREE TRIMMING 010-4150-410.34-05 3,000.00 1154 TREE REMOVAL 025-7250-410.34-05 1,400.00 1558414/24/2026 DAVE'S HAULING CO, INC609.04 4182026B CHANNEL CLEAN UP 305-8831-500.34-05 609.04 1558424/24/2026 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DI22,501.54 EMWD042026 FEB 2026 REMAINING BAL 055-0000-308.07-30 16,891.11 EMWD042026 FEB 2026 REMAINING BAL 055-0000-201.20-40 5,610.43 1558434/24/2026 EMPOWER RETIREMENT, LLC125.00 EMPOWER041426 GROUP #109947 085-0000-202.21-29 125.00 1558444/24/2026 KIMBERLY GANIMIAN387.00 GANIMIAN041326 26-079 MEAL PER DIEM 010-1400-414.31-20 387.00 1558454/24/2026 NATHAN HARRINGTON1,080.73 HARRINGTN041326 26-085 REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSES 017-2290-418.31-20 1,080.73 Page 33 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1558464/24/2026 HEMET INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY9.09 67832 SUPPLIES 010-4140-410.21-12 36.53 68089 SUPPLIES 010-4140-410.21-12 1.31 68090 SUPPLIES RETURN 010-4140-410.21-12(28.75) 1558474/24/2026 HEMET VALLEY TOOL402.29 QS-1546 SUPPLIES 010-7100-410.21-80 402.29 1558484/24/2026 YANELI HERNANDEZ349.02 HERNANDEZ041626 26-070 REIMBURSE TRAVEL EXPENSES 011-1700-417.31-20 349.02 1558494/24/2026 HIRSCH PIPE & SUPPLY CO.,602.94 1777136 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 368.01 1777140 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 201.32 1792432 SUPPLIES 050-9000-450.21-12 33.61 1558504/24/2026 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES432.34 7341170 SUPPLIES 055-4170-450.21-12 304.38 341425 SUPPLIES 331-8831-500.34-05 127.96 1558514/24/2026 MISSION SQUARE15,226.99 6853444 GROUP #100338 085-0000-202.21-29 7,741.38 6914234 GROUP #300434 085-0000-202.21-29 6,963.72 6914234 GROUP #300434 085-0000-202.21-48 521.89 1558524/24/2026 INFOSEND INC.1,043.21 307849 ADDRESS CHANGE SVCS 050-1400-414.34-05 5.25 307849 ADDRESS CHANGE SVCS 055-1400-414.34-05 5.25 308271 DATA/PROCESS SERVICES 050-1400-414.34-05 516.36 308271 DATA/PROCESS SERVICES 055-1400-414.34-05 516.35 1558534/24/2026 INTERPRETERS UNLIMITED3.00 454209 INTERPRETATION SVCS 010-3100-431.34-05 3.00 1558544/24/2026 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP34,566.25 3400792 FEB 2026 SVCS 199-9999-425.40-01 34,566.25 1558554/24/2026 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH P63,482.63 335233988626 MAY 2026 PREMIUM 085-0000-202.21-39 63,482.63 1558564/24/2026 FUAAD KHAN700.00 KHAN040726 REIMBURSE STUDENT LOAN 010-2500-425.31-20 700.00 1558574/24/2026 VALENTINA LOPEZ126.89 LOPEZ040726 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES 010-2500-425.11-90 126.89 1558584/24/2026 MANPOWER648.84 5137222 W/E 4/5/26 010-1210-412.34-05 648.84 1558594/24/2026 LORI MATLEY000-4613-615.58-59 15.00 MATLEY040726 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES15.00 1558604/24/2026 JULIE MCCOMBS000-4613-615.58-60 145.06 MCCOMBS040726 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES145.06 Page 34 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1558614/24/2026 MINUTEMAN PRESS000-4613-615.58-61 203.13 84873 254 WEEKLY NOTICES203.13 1558624/24/2026 RUTH MONTOYA000-4613-615.58-62 1,398.00 MONTOYA040726 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES1,398.00 1558634/24/2026 PHILLIP MOOTHART000-4613-615.58-63 386.04 MOOTHART040626 REIMBURSE WORK BOOT386.04 1558644/24/2026 MRC HEAVY EQUIP XPERTS, LL000-4613-615.58-64 3,193.77 1307 BIT INSPECTION2,443.77 1309 BIT INSPECTION750.00 1558654/24/2026 TESSA MURPHY000-4613-615.58-65 301.00 MURPHY012126 26-067 MEAL PER DIEM301.00 1558664/24/2026 PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORAT000-4613-615.58-66 355,290.50 6 WORK COMPLETED373,990.00 6 RETENTION WITHHELD(18,699.50) 1558674/24/2026 PACIFIC PRODUCTS & SERVICE000-4613-615.58-67 405.19 38008 SUPPLIES405.19 1558684/24/2026 PAYNE PEST MANAGEMENT INC000-4613-615.58-68 150.00 436543 MONTHLY SVC150.00 1558694/24/2026 PLUMBERS DEPOT, INC.000-4613-615.58-69 226.94 PD-61054 DIAGNOSTICS CHARGE226.94 1558704/24/2026 PREMIER INDOOR SOCCER INC000-4613-615.58-70 605.00 PIS041426 REFUND BALANCE APP# 18-8605.00 1558714/24/2026 PRISM000-4613-615.58-71 354.90 26401518 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROG354.90 1558724/24/2026 PUBLIC TRUST ADVISORS, LLC000-4613-615.58-72 2,287.16 696489 SMA FEE Q1 20262,287.16 1558734/24/2026 REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTH000-4613-615.58-73 71,776.00 040726MSHCP MSHCP FEES MAR 202671,776.00 1558744/24/2026 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF D000-4613-615.58-74 1,153.05 SH0000050232 CONTRACT LW ABC-OTS GRANT 1,153.05 1558754/24/2026 ROGERS,ANDERSON,MALODY & S000-4613-615.58-75 15,000.00 80314 APRIL 2026 BILLING11,000.00 80314 APRIL 2026 BILLING4,000.00 1558764/24/2026 ROMERIL PLUMBING & HARDWAR000-4613-615.58-76 578.10 20514 SUPPLIES34.78 20451 SUPPLIES47.84 20510 SUPPLIES16.31 20534 SUPPLIES129.01 20541 SUPPLIES110.96 20556 SUPPLIES239.20 Page 35 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1558774/24/2026 SEVEN STAR MEDICAL GROUP,000-4613-615.58-77 220.00 7STAR012526 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL220.00 1558784/24/2026 SHRED-IT USA000-4613-615.58-78 375.75 8014012809 SHREDDING SVCS375.75 1558794/24/2026 SOCAL GAS000-4613-615.58-79 353.06 SOCALGAS042026 UTILITY GAS SVCS124.07 SOCALGAS042026 UTILITY GAS SVCS24.97 SOCALGAS042026 UTILITY GAS SVCS41.22 SOCALGAS042026 UTILITY GAS SVCS51.39 SOCALGAS042026 UTILITY GAS SVCS111.41 1558804/24/2026 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON000-4613-615.58-80 59.28 SCE041626 ELECTRICITY SERVICES35.46 SCE041626 ELECTRICITY SERVICES23.82 1558814/24/2026 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT O000-4613-615.58-81 109.00 28462 FINGERPRINTING109.00 1558824/24/2026 DELEN THOMAS000-4613-615.58-82 41.67 THOMAS040726 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES41.67 1558834/24/2026 TONY'S TIRES000-4613-615.58-83 35.00 TT041626 TIRE PATCHING35.00 1558844/24/2026 UNIFIRST CORPORATION000-4613-615.58-84 222.91 2200387941 UNIFORM SVCS133.53 2200387945 UNIFORM SVCS89.38 1558854/24/2026 UHS PREMIUM BILLING000-4613-615.58-85 61,027.67 925502947382 MAY 2026 PREMIUM59,942.71 925502947382 MAY 2026 PREMIUM1,084.96 1558864/24/2026 CALMAT CO DBA VULCAN MATER000-4613-615.58-86 498.13 6207539 ASPHALT249.69 6207747 ASPHALT248.44 1558874/24/2026 WESTERN STATE BUILDERS, IN000-4613-615.58-87 18,113.10 4 RELEASE RETENTION9,737.95 4 RELEASE RETENTION2,414.60 4 RELEASE RETENTION5,960.55 1558884/24/2026 KEVIN WHITE000-4613-615.58-88 318.52 WHITE033126A REIMBURSE LOAN PAYMENT318.52 1558894/24/2026 WILLDAN000-4613-615.58-89 9,340.07 002-37636 MAR 2026 SVCS9,340.07 1558904/24/2026 CRYSTAL WILLIAMSON000-4613-615.58-90 1,217.40 WILLIAMSN012126 26-064 MEAL PER DIEM387.00 WILLIAMSN040726 REIMBURSE H/D/V EXPENSES830.40 1558914/24/2026 YUNEX LLC000-4613-615.58-91 5,190.00 5610007941 INSTALL STL POLE5,190.00 Page 36 City of San JacintoWarrant Register4/30/26Check NumberCheck Date Vendor Name Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 1558924/24/2026 ALFONSO ZUBIA000-4613-615.58-92 400.00 ZUBIA040826 REIMBURSE WORK BOOTS400.00 1558934/24/2026 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES, INC.000-4613-615.58-93 1,517.07 11759 SUPPLIES1,517.07 Total Checks 4,298,878.57 Page 37 CITY OF SAN JACINTO ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER REPORT April 1 - 30, 2026 DATE PAYEE AMOUNT REASON 4/1/2026 CalPers 1,072.01 CalPers Retirement 4/1/2026 CalPers 54,747.63 CalPers Retirement 4/2/2026 CalPers 8,124.24 CalPers 457 04/02/2026 4/6/2026 SCE 76,440.42 SJP Power VA Sales-November 2025 4/10/2026 Quadient 2,000.00 Postage 4/16/2026 CalPers 8,137.17 CalPers 457 04/16/2026 4/16/2026 CalPers 55,057.43 CalPers Retirement 4/17/2026 Corp Coll Paymentus Group 9,204.90 Payment Process Transaction Fees 4/20/2026 Enterprise FM 590422 54,759.17 Monthly Vehicle Lease & Maintenance 4/21/2026 CDTFA 10,165.00 SJP EES Q1 4/23/2026 NRG 543,439.00 SJ Power - Energy Purchase (Regular Charges) 4/23/2026 Exelon Generation Company, LLC 170,485.60 SJ Power - Energy Purchase 4/23/2026 Duran Mesa 8,619.00 SJ Power - Energy Purchase 4/23/2026 The Midway Sunset Cogeneration Co.72,513.00 SJ Power - Energy Purchase 4/23/2026 Avangrid (Manzana Wind, LLC)16,847.70 SJ Power - Energy Purchase 4/23/2026 Calpine Energy Service 53,750.00 SJ Power - Energy Purchase & Sales 4/23/2026 Participate.Energy, LLC 7,527.15 SJ Power - Energy Purchase Page 1 CITY OF SAN JACINTO ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER REPORT April 1 - 30, 2026 DATE PAYEE AMOUNT REASON 4/23/2026 Santa Paula Energy Storage, LLC 10,500.00 SJ Power - Energy Purchase (Resource Adequacy) 4/23/2026 The Voyager Wind Expansion, LLC 18,371.11 SJ Power - Energy Purchase 4/23/2026 Tecolote Wind, LLC 30,687.50 SJ Power - Energy Purchase (Resource Adequacy) 4/23/2026 Morgan Stanley Cap 93,581.70 SJ Power - Energy Purchase 4/23/2026 Sierra Pacific Industries 2,154.76 SJ Power - Energy Purchase 4/23/2026 California Choice Energy 227,825.85 SJ Power - Energy Purchase 4/27/2026 SCE 85,253.10 SJP Power VA Sales-December 2025 4/30/2026 CalPers 9,050.98 CalPers 457 04/30/2026 4/30/2026 CalPers 54,154.18 CalPers Retirement 4/30/2026 CalPers 1,072.01 CalPers Retirement 1,685,540.61 Page 2 July 7, 2026 TO:City Council REQUESTED BY:Kimberly Ganimian, Finance Director APPROVED BY:Travis Randel, Interim City Manager SUBJECT:Report of City-Wide User Fee Increase RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council RECEIVE and FILE the report of the City-Wide User Fee increases. DISCUSSION: As part of a general cost recovery strategy, local governments adopt user fees to fund services that provide limited or no direct benefit to the community as a whole. User Fees recover costs associated with providing specific services, which benefit the user, thereby reducing the use of General Fund monies for such purposes. Cost recovery objectives can be based on a variety of factors, including public versus private benefits provided by the service. If an activity has a public benefit, it might be more appropriately supported by the General Fund. Conversely, if an activity has mostly private benefits, it might be more appropriately supported by fees. Activities that have a mix of public and private benefits may be supported by the combination of fees and the General Fund. In an effort to both understand and establish appropriate levels of cost recovery for City services, the City entered into a Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Financial Services for a City-Wide User Fee Study and City-Wide Cost Allocation Plan in 2019. The Study found that fee increases were necessary to achieve the City’s objective of full cost recovery. On August 15, 2023, a Public Hearing was held to consider the proposed fee increases, and the San Jacinto City Council voted unanimously to approve the recommended fee schedule. The fees were set by Resolution No. 4000, which also defined the escalation factor and included a provision requiring that the annual fee increase be presented to the City Council as an informational item. Accordingly, the City’s user fee schedule, effective July 1, 2026, is attached to this staff report. FISCAL IMPACT: User fees have been increased by a factor of 3.2% based on the escalation factor established in Resolution No. 4000. This increase will assist in defraying the rising cost of providing the services identified in the User Fee Schedule due to inflation. Attachments FY 26-27 Comprehensive User Fee Schedule.pdf Resolution No. 4000.pdf City of San Jacinto Development Services (951) 487-7330 www.sanjacintoca.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE This document will assist you in calculating an estimate of Building and Engineering Permit and Plan Check and Planning Entitlement Fees for your proposed construction project. Please keep in mind that this is an estimate of City fees only and that there may be additional development fees from other agencies, departments, or divisions. Furthermore, there may be additional development fees from outside agencies, such as the County Health Department, your local School District, or other federal, state, or local agencies. For other Agency, Department, or Division fees please contact: Engineering – Tri-Lakes Consultants (951) 654-3592 City of San Jacinto Water Department (951) 487-7330 X747 Eastern Municipal Water District (951) 928-3777 X2081 Lake Hemet Municipal Water District (951) 658-3241 Riverside County Fire Marshal (951) 955-4777 County of Riverside Environmental Health (951) 358-5172 For local School District fees please contact: San Jacinto Unified School District (951) 929-7700 X4680 Hemet Unified School District (951) 765-5100 x 5480 BUILDING DATA: Building Permit Valuations are updated annually, effective July 1, based on the previous year’s February published ICC Valuation Tables. The Building Permit Valuation is not intended to represent the actual cost of constructing a given project; however, it does provide the baseline metric for determining permit and plan check fees. Multiply the total square footage of the building by the “Per Square Foot Value” listed in the most current February ICC posting. This value will represent the total cost of construction for the purpose of calculating Plan Check and Building Permit Fees. Valuation Worksheet AREA SQUARE FOOTAGE OCCUPANCY GROUP AND CONSTRCUTION TYPE VALUE (PER ICC TABLE) SUB-TOTAL 1 2 3 4 Building Permit Valuation Total DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE Effective July 1, 2026 2 BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION APPLICABLE FEE SUB-TOTAL $1 to $500 $27.91 $501 to $2,000 $27.91 for the first $500 plus $3.62 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000 $2,001 to $25,000 $82.27 for the first $2,000 plus $16.63 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000 $25,001 to $50,000 $464.71 for the first $25,000 plus $11.99 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000 $50,001 to $100,000 $764.52 for the first $50,000 plus $8.31 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000 $100,001 to $500,000 $1,180.21 for the first $100,000 plus $6.65 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000 $500,001 to $1,000,000 $3,839.81 for the first $500,000 plus $5.64 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000 $1,000,001 and up $6,658.29 for the first $1,000,000 plus $4.33 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof PLAN CHECK FEE: Combination Permits (Residential or Commercial) 65% of Building Permit fee above Trade Permits (Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing) As stated below. CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION FEE $1 per every $25,000, or portion thereof, in construction valuation STRONG MOTION INSTRUMENTATION PROGRAM (SMIP) FEE: Residential Structures: Valuation X 0.0013 = SMIP Fee Commercial Structures: Valuation X 0.0028 = SMIP Fee PERMIT ISSUANCE FEE (ALL PERMITS): $51 CERTIFICATE OR TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY: $61 DEMOLITION PERMIT: $125 REROOF: $79 TRADE AND SPECIALTY PERMITS Electrical Permit Fee See Fee Schedule Mechanical Permit Fee See Fee Schedule Plumbing Permit Fee See Fee Schedule Mobile Home Permit See Fee Schedule Pool & Spa Permit See Fee Schedule Sign Permit See Fee Schedule Solar Permit See Fee Schedule Wall & Fence Permit See Fee Schedule DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE Effective July 1, 2026 3 OTHER BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION FEES: Fire and Life Safety Service Fee: 0.10% of Valuation Energy Conservation Review: 15% of Building Permit Fee Imaging and Storage: 0.02% of Valuation plus $5 per sheet for all plans required to be retained indefinitely by state law New Addressing: $30 per lot or location OTHER FEES AND OPTIONS: After Hours Holiday Inspections (when available): $253 per hour (2 hour minimum) After Hours Inspections (when available): $162 per hour (2 hour minimum) Duplicate Permit or Inspection Card (city printed): $30 Expedited Plan Check (when available) 100% of Plan Check Fee Inspection Fee (after 2 failed inspections): $102 per hour (1 hour minimum) Investigation Inspections: 100% of Plan Check Fee Permit Transfer Fee: $30 Plan Check Revisions: $125 per hour Other Inspections not otherwise listed: $125 CITY SURCHARGES GENERAL PLAN MAINTENANCE FEE: All Permit or Entitlement Fees X 1.9% TECHNOLOGY FEE: All Permit or Entitlement Fees X 5% TRANSPORTATION / HAUL PERMIT Annual: $97 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE Effective July 1, 2026 4 DECK OR PATIO, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING & MECHANICAL FEE SCHEDULES For new buildings or additions, these fees only apply if the builder desires to pull separate Plumbing, Mechanical, and/or Electrical Permits; otherwise, these fees are included in the combination building permit. The following fees are intended to be applied to projects where a Per Square Foot Fee Calculation Method is not applicable due to the minor nature of work performed. For most building projects, the per square foot calculation method is to be used to determine the Electrical, Plumbing and Mechanical fees. Mobile Home Permits Mobile Home Building Permit Fee Sum of Mobile Home Fees Mobile Home Plan Check Fee 65% of Mobile Home Permit Fee Mobile Home Awning $39 Each Mobile Home Installation $207 Per Lot Mobile Home Patio Room $111 Each Mobile Home Permanent Foundation $142 Per Lot Mobile Home Porch / Deck $64 Each Deck or Patio Deck or Patio – City Standard $122 Each Deck or Patio – Non-City Standard $245 Each Electrical Trade Permits Electrical Building Permit Fee Sum of Electrical Items Electrical Plan Check Fee 65% of Electrical Permit Fee Outlets/Receptacles/Switches/Fixtures/Sockets $2 Per Unit Temporary Power Pole $51 Per Unit Dwelling Re-Wire (Partial) $160 Per Unit Dwelling Re-Wire (Full) $322 Per Unit Service Upgrades or Changes Up to 200A $65 Per Unit 201A to 1000A $134 Per Unit Over 1000A $207 Per Unit Switchboards (sub-panels) Up to 600V $70 Per Unit Over 600V $142 Per Unit Motors, generators, transformers Up to 3 HP/KW/KVA $26 Per Unit 3 to 50 HP/KW/KVA $53 Per Unit OVER 50 HP/KW/KVA $107 Per Unit Special Event Electrical - Per Connection $39 Per Unit Additional Electrical System Not Otherwise Listed $24 Per Unit DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE Effective July 1, 2026 5 Mechanical Trade Permits Mechanical Building Permit Fee Sum of all Mechanical Fees Mechanical Plan Check Fee 65% of the Building Permit Fee Air Handler $31 Per Unit Boiler, A/C Units / Compressors Up to 3 HP/Ton OR 100,000 BTU $31 Per Unit 3-15 HP/Ton $42 Per Unit 15.1 to 30 HP/Ton $56 Per Unit 30.1 to 50 HP/Ton $68 Per Unit Over 50 HP/Ton OR 175K BTU $93 Per Unit Duct Or Vents (Linear Feet) $11 Per 100 Linear Feet Evaporation Coolers $22 Per Unit Exhaust Hood $22 Per Unit Furnace $31 Per Unit Heating, Refrigeration, Cooling, Absorption, Unit Or System Repair $29 Per Unit Incinerators $31 Per Unit Ventilation And Exhaust Fan $11 Per Unit Additional Mechanical Not Otherwise Listed $22 Per Unit Plumbing Trade Permits Plumbing Building Permit Fee Sum of Plumbing Fees Plumbing Plan Check Fee 65% of Plumbing Building Permit Fee Fixtures And Traps $20 Per Unit Interceptor / Grease Trap $41 Per Unit Water Piping $9 Per Unit Rainwater System (Per Drain) $20 Per Unit Private Sewer / Septic System $142 Each Connection Sewer Connection $53 Each Connection Repair Alteration Of Drain Or Vent $9 Per Unit Backflow Preventer $39 Per Unit Dwelling Re-Pipe (Full) $36 Per Unit Water Heaters $26 Per Unit Gas Piping $12 Per Unit Additional Plumbing System Not Otherwise Listed $20 Per Unit Pool & Spa Permits Pool & Spa Building Permit Fee Sum of Pool and Spa Fees Pool Plan Check Fee $142 Per Permit Pool / Spa Equipment $70 Per Unit Gas Connection $39 Per Connection Sign Permits Sign Building Permit Valuation Table Sign Plan Check 65% of Building Permit Fee Lighting or Marquees from One Circuit $53 Per Unit Additional Lighting Or Marquees Circuit On Same Sign $9 Per Unit DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE Effective July 1, 2026 6 Solar Permits Solar Review Building Permit Fee (1 hour minimum) $125 Per Hour Solar Inspection Fee (up to 2 inspections) $288 Per Permit Wall & Fence Permits Wall and Fence Building Permit Fee $32 Per 300 Linear Feet Wall and Fence Plan check Fee $60 Per 100 Linear Feet DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE Effective July 1, 2026 7 ENGINEERING, GRADING, STORM WATER AND ENCROACHMENT PERMITS Grading Permits: QUANTITY PERMIT FEE PLAN CHECK FEE SUB-TOTAL 50 cubic yards or less $51 $51 51 to 100 cubic yards $79 $79 101 to 1,000 cubic yards $79 $79 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards $254 --- 1,001 to 100,000 cubic yards --- $106 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards for the first 10,000 cubic yards $426 --- 100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards for the first 100,000 cubic yards --- $586 100,001 cubic yards or more for the first 100,000 cubic yards $1,073 --- 200,001 or more for the first 200,000 cubic yards --- $874 Encroachment and Construction Permits: Encroachment Permit Fee $51 Encroachment Inspection Fee $84 Encroachment Plan Check 2.5% of Engineer’s Estimate Subdivision, CUP, Site Plan, and new Construction Projects Plan Check 3.0% of Engineer’s Estimate Subdivision, CUP, Site Plan, and new Construction Projects Inspection 2.5% of Engineering Estimate Fire Hydrant, Blue Dot, Water Service, Sewer Lateral, other not included above Actual Costs DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE Effective July 1, 2026 8 Final Map Check, Lot Line Adjustments, Vacations Final Subdivision Map Check 1-4 Lots $1,251 + $62 / lot 5-12 Lots $1,876 + $49 / lot 13-49 Lots $2,502 + $37 / lot 50+ Lots $3,753 + $24 / lot Right-of-Way Vacation (Summary) Actual Cost – $2,500 initial deposit Right-of-Way Vacation (Standard) Actual Cost – $10,000 initial deposit Lot Line Adjustment / Merger $217 Application Fee Plus $2,300 deposit NPDES Industrial – High Priority $251 Industrial – Medium Priority $200 Industrial – Low Priority $99 Restaurants – High Priority $83 Restaurants – Medium Priority $65 Restaurants – Low Priority $49 Commercial – High Priority $71 Commercial – Medium Priority $60 Commercial – Low Priority $49 Other – Inactive / Residential / Non-Inspection $24 Post Construction BMP (Residential & Commercial) $166 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE Effective July 1, 2026 9 PLANNING AND ENTITLEMENT FEES Application fees are typically non-refundable. Unused portions of deposits will be reimbursed upon the project's completion. The Planning Staff retains the authority to adjust the deposit amount, either higher or lower, depending on the project's complexity. The initial deposit encompasses a 15% Administrative Fee. Additional deposits might be necessary, and any surplus deposits will be returned upon the project's conclusion. Fee Type Application Fee Initial Deposit Amount Due at Submittal Agriculture Preserve – Establishment/Dissolution /Diminishment $4,352 $10,000 $14,352 Agricultural Preserve - Notice Of Non-Renewal $162 $5,000 $5,162 Annexation $2,175 $25,000 $27,175 Appeal $1,632 $3,000 $4,632 Cannabis Oriented Land Use Permit $4,420 $10,000 $14,420 Cannabis Regulatory Permit $1,319 $5,000 $6,319 Cannabis Regulatory Permit - Annual Renewal $573 $1,000 $1,573 Change Of Zone / Text Amendment $7,617 $10,000 $17,617 Specific Plan / Amended Specific Plan $8,705 $25,000 $33,705 Conditional Use Permit $6,528 $10,000 $16,528 Development Agreement $10,881 $20,000 $30,881 Environmental Assessment (CEQA) $1,088 $5,000 $6,088 Environmental Impact Report 25% of Contract Amount or $7,255, whichever is greater Contract Amount Varies per Contract Amount Extension Of Time $324 $1,000 $1,324 General Plan Amendment $8,705 $10,000 $18,705 Landscape and Irrigation Review 5.5% of Valuation or $576, whichever is greater ---* Varies per Valuation Large Family Daycare $217 --- $217 Modifications to an Approved Project $821 Varies with Project* $821 Minor Use Permit $4,303 $5,000 $9,303 Minor Variance $535 $1,000 $1,535 Planned Development Permit $4,352 $15,000 $19,352 Pre-Application Review $543 $2,500 $3,043 Site Plan & Design Review $324 $500 $824 Sign Review, Accessory Structures, Minor Facade Modifications Site Plan & Design Review $324 ---* $324 Single-Family Home, Sign Program DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE Effective July 1, 2026 10 Fee Type Application Fee Initial Deposit Amount Due at Submittal Site Plan & Design Review $1,632 $5,000 $6,632 Tract, Commercial, Industrial Special Event Permit $75 ---* $75 Substantial Conformance $821 $2,000 $2,821 Surface Mining Permit $7,399 $20,000 $27,399 Temporary Use Permit $75 ---* $75 Tentative Tract Map / Revision $8,705 $15,000 $23,705 Tentative Parcel Map $6,528 $8,000 $14,528 Variance $1,632 $1,000 $2,632 Vesting Tentative Tract Map $10,881 $20,000 $30,881 Water Quality Management Plan Preliminary $3,157 ---* $3,157 Water Quality Management Plan Final Commercial <8 acres $5,384 ---* $5,384 Industrial <5 acres Residential <19 units Commercial 8 to 23 acres $6,074 ---* $6,074 Industrial 5 to 18 acres Residential 19 to 50 units Commercial >23 acres $8,413 ---* $8,413 Industrial >18 acres Residential >50 units Zoning and Clearance Confirmation, Special Letters/Reports, Reasonable Accommodation $75 ---* $75 * Deposits - Although generally not required, a deposit may be required if, based on the specific nature of the request, the project is expected to exceed the time necessary to complete the review included in application fee amount. Contact Planning for additional information. Resolution No. 4000 Page 1 of 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO. 4000 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A USER FEE SCHEDULE TO RECOVER THE COST OF SERVICES PROVIDED BY CITY DEPARTMENTS AND AUTOMATIC ANNUAL COST OF LIVING FEE INCREASE WHEREAS, state law authorizes local agencies to collect fees to defray the costs of providing programs and services; and WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto provides a variety of services to the general public and other governmental agencies; and WHEREAS, the City desires to recover direct and indirect management support costs associated with the costs of providing services; and WHEREAS, the City Council previously approved City Council Resolutions and Ordinances that imposed a variety of user fees including, but not limited to planning and building fees, public works fees, and water fees; and WHEREAS, the City retained Willdan Financial Services to prepare a fee study to evaluate whether the City's user fees were commensurate with the reasonable costs of providing the services and programs for which the fees are imposed ("User Fee Study"); and WHEREAS, based on the User Fee Study, the City has prepared a new Citywide User Fee Schedule, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and by this reference incorporated herein ("the new User Fee Schedule"), which increases certain existing user fees and imposes new user fees; and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council of the City of San Jacinto concerning the new User Fee Schedule was given in accordance with all applicable State and Local law, including but not limited to Government Code sections 6062a, 66016, 66017 and 66018; and WHEREAS, on August 15, 2023 the City Council of the City of San Jacinto conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the new User Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, the cost estimates and fee calculations applicable to the new User Fee Schedule were presented to the City Council at the above-referenced public hearing. At which, members of the public were able to present written and oral comments regarding the fees, and the User Fee Study was available for public inspection and review at least ten (10) days prior to that public hearing; and DocuSign Envelope ID: 7ADC5B4D-2BD0-4124-BC8E-A8D51F921C77 Resolution No. 4000 Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS, The City Council has considered the information and public testimony presented in the public hearing and in the new User Fee Schedule, the User Fee Study, the staff report and any written correspondence relating to this item, all of which are included in the public record and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council finds that the above recitations are true and correct and, accordingly, are incorporated as a material part of this Resolution. SECTION 2. The City Council finds and determines that the fees for service and the billing and overhead rates established by this Resolution do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs of services for which they were imposed and otherwise comply with the provisions of California law and specifically Government Code Sections 66000 et seq. SECTION 3. The fees for service and the billing and overhead rates are statutory and categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Setting these fees fits within the statutory exemption for City decisions involving rates, tolls, or other charges contained within Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and section 15273 of the CEQA Guidelines. SECTION 4. This Resolution shall go into full force and effect immediately, but the individual fees shall become effective as provided by the applicabl e provisions of State Law. SECTION 5. The fees set forth in the new User Fee Schedule (Exhibit to this Resolution) shall replace and supersede that fee in the current User Fee Schedule. To the extent this Resolution conflicts any other prior Resolution or Ordinance addressing fees that are included in the new User Fee Schedule, this Resolution shall prevail. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that any fee established or authorized pursuant to the new User Fee Schedule is declared invalid, the City Council hereby authorizes the City to impose that fee in the amount most recently approved by the City Council through the adoption of the current User Fee Schedule. SECTION 6. All fees set forth in the new User Fee Schedule (exhibit to this Resolution) shall be increased by the Consumer Price Index ("CPI") on July 1 st of each year. These increases shall be based on the CPI for all Urban Consumers Riverside-San Bernardino- Ontario, CA area published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Period of December of the previous year through December of the current year; provided however, that no inflationary adjustment may exceed the cost of providing the service for which the fee is imposed. The City Manager shall approve th e annual increase in fees administratively and present the increased fees to the City Council as an informational item. SECTION 7. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is, for any reason, held to be invalid by final judgment of a court of DocuSign Envelope ID: 7ADC5B4D-2BD0-4124-BC8E-A8D51F921C77 Resolution No. 4000 Page 3 of 4 competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution and each section, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution, irrespective of the fact that one or more provisions may be declared invalid. SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of August 2023 by the following vote: AYES: Ayala, Ruiz, Vandever NAYS: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None City of San Jacinto ___________________ Alonso Ledezma, Mayor ATTEST: ___ _ ___ Julia Espinoza, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Best, Best & Krieger LLP ___ _____ Craig Hayes, City Attorney DocuSign Envelope ID: 7ADC5B4D-2BD0-4124-BC8E-A8D51F921C77 Resolution No. 4000 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) I, Julia Espinoza, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 4000 was passed, approved, and adopted at the Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council held on the 15th day of August 2023. AYES: Ayala, Ruiz, Vandever NAYS: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 15th day of August 2023. _____________________________________ Julia Espinoza, City Clerk City of San Jacinto DocuSign Envelope ID: 7ADC5B4D-2BD0-4124-BC8E-A8D51F921C77 July 7, 2026 TO:City Council REQUESTED BY:Yaneli Hernandez, Senior Planner APPROVED BY:Travis Randel, Interim City Manager SUBJECT: A proposal by Taylor and Clark Consulting on behalf of Richard Michael and Ramona Dairy, LLC, to establish a master-planned residential development consisting of 419 dwelling units as well as the construction of onsite roadways, a detention basin, parks, and on-site landscaping on 73.97-net acres. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: 1. DETERMINE that the proposed Project will not have a significant effect on the environment with the incorporation of mitigation measures based on the findings set forth in the case record and ADOPT a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); 2. APPROVE the General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Very Low Density Residential (VLDR) to Low Density Residential (LDR); 3. APPROVE the Change of Zone from Rural Residential (RR) to Residential Low Density (RL); 4. APPROVE the Chacon Farms Planned Development Permit; and 5. APPROVE Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 39076 to subdivide 73.97- net acres, into 419 single-family lots for the ultimate construction of 419 single-family detached residences, and to create lettered lots for onsite roadways, a detention basin, park, and on-site landscape subject to the Recommended Conditions of Approval (PROJ23-0029). DISCUSSION: On March 24, 2026, the Planning Commission, after holding a Public Hearing, unanimously adopted PC Resolution No. 26- 01, recommending that the City Council approve PROJ23-0029 (“Project”). The Project is a proposal by Taylor and Clark Consulting on behalf of Richard Michael and Ramona Dairy, LLC, to establish a master-planned residential development consisting of 419 homes as well as the construction of onsite roadways, detention basins, parks, and on-site landscaping on 73.97-net acres. To facilitate the development, the applicant submitted a General Plan Amendment (GPA), Change of Zone (CZ), Planned Development Permit (PDP), and Tentative Tract Map (TTM 39076) for review and approval. While most subdivisions are approved by the Planning Commission, projects that contain policy decisions, such as a GPA, CZ, and PDP, require review and approval of the City Council. The Project site is located on the west side of Cawston Avenue, extending between Seventh Street and Esplanade Avenue. The project site is currently occupied by Chacon Farms and Bruno Ranches agricultural operations, which includes two single- family residences occupied by caretakers. The project site is surrounded by residential uses to the north and east, residential and agricultural uses to the west, and a dairy farm to the south. The current General Plan Land Use Designation is Very Low Density Residential, and the current Zone is Rural Residential. The existing designations allows a maximum of 2 units per gross acre (151 dwelling units for the project site). The proposed General Plan Amendment designation is Low Density Residential (LDR) and the proposed zoning is Residential Low Density (RL). The LDR and RL designations allow residential uses with densities ranging from 2.1 to 7 dwelling units per acre. This change is necessary to allow the developer to meet their project objectives to construct homes on smaller-lots, with a denser product type than is currently permitted on the site. The proposed designations are compatible with all the surrounding land uses and consistent with the character and density of the development north and west of the project. If adopted the General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone would allow a minimum of 158 units and a maximum of 529 units. Subdivision TTM 39076 consists of 419 individual lots, ranging in size from 3,700 to 7,900 square feet. The subdivision would also establish internal roadways, basins, and designated open space and park areas. Two vehicular access points are planned, which include an east-west oriented roadway from Cawston Avenue, which borders the development to the east, and a north-south oriented roadway that connects to Seventh Street which borders the project to the north. These two proposed entrance roadways lead to a network of internal streets within the tract that ensure appropriate access to every facet of the development, including all homes, parks and basins. The new roads will be private streets that include curb, gutter, sidewalks and streetlights. The internal roads will be private streets, maintained by an Homeowners Association (HOA) with parking allowed on one side of each street. The recommended conditions of approval require the applicant to widen Seventh Street and Cawston Avenue and install improvement to each roadway that include curb, gutter, sidewalk, streetlights and landscaping. In addition, to ensure that nearby intersections will operate at acceptable levels with the additional traffic created, traffic signals will be required at the intersections of Cawston Avenue and Seventh Street as well as Cawston Avenue and Cottonwood Avenue. The Engineering and Fire Department have reviewed the project to ensure it meets all access and circulation requirements. Frontage improvements, including curb, gutters and sidewalks, along Esplanade Avenue, which borders the project site to the south, will be constructed as part of the City’s adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which includes the widening of Esplanade Avenue from Warren Road to Sanderson Avenue. The CIP project also include a traffic signal at the intersection at Cawston Avenue and Esplanade Avenue and therefore it is not a required condition of approval. However, the Developer will be required to install the street lights and landscaping improvements along Esplanade Avenue, which are not covered by the City's CIP Project. Planned Development Permit (PDP) A PDP is also proposed as part of the Project to support the ultimate development of the subdivision. The PDP provides for a more efficient use of the land and a better living environment and also encourages enhanced amenities. The PDP incorporates the following design features and improvements to facilitate the proposed community: Five different architectural styles for the homes with nine color schemes; A dual park and basin feature that provides both recreation space and functional stormwater infrastructure; Play equipment and design elements that reflect the agricultural character of the surrounding area; A coordinated landscape palette that complements the architectural character of the surrounding area; Decorative perimeter walls with stone veneer pilasters, enhanced with landscaping and vines; Tubular steel fencing with split-face block pilasters at the water quality basin; An enhanced entry feature along Cawston Avenue with accent landscaping and 24-inch box trees; A paseo connection to Esplanade Avenue providing pedestrian access to and from the community; Architectural design standards that exceed minimum Development Code requirements, including five floors plans with multiple elevation types and varied materials such as siding, brick and stone veneer, clay tile elements, and enhanced widow treatments. The PDP also allows deviations from some of the Development Standards of the RL zone. The modifications to the development standards ensure a more efficient use of the project site, while remaining consistent with the Goals and Policies of the General Plan, and market trends. The applicable standards are listed in the table below: Development Feature RL Zone Development Code Proposed Proposed Modification Density 2.1-7.0 DU/AC 5.53 DU/AC No Parcel Area (Net) 5,000 sq. ft.3,717 sq. ft.Yes Parcel Width Interior 50 ft.45 ft.Yes Parcel Width Corner 70 ft.25 ft.Yes Parcel Depth 100 ft.60 ft.Yes Setback Front of Building 20 ft.10 ft.Yes Setback to Front of Garage N/A 20 ft.N/A Setback (Interior)5 ft.4 ft.Yes Setback Street Side 10 ft.5 ft.Yes Setback Rear 20 ft.10 ft.Yes Rear with Slope 20 ft.10 ft.Yes Lot Coverage - Structure 55%60%Yes Primary Structure Height 35 ft.35 ft.No Proposed Homes The proposed residential units would include 4 to 5 bedrooms, and optional loft spaces within specific floor plans. The development includes one- and two-story homes inspired by an agrarian architecture. The homes would range in size from approximately 1,758 to 3,025 square feet, providing a variety of housing options capable of meeting the needs of different household types and lifestyles. All homes would include a two-car garage as well as driveways that can accommodate additional parking. PLANNING COMMISSION: On March 24, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing for the proposed project. During the hearing, Staff recommended the modification of condition #79 and condition #108 requiring that the Development Impact Fees be subject to the provisions of the enabling ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in effect on the Vesting Date (3/31/2026). At the close of the Public Hearing, the Planning Commission unanimously adopted PC Resolution No. 26-01 (5-0 in favor), recommending that the City Council approve the project with the revised Conditions of Approval (attached). Following Planning Commission review, staff added Condition No. 87 to the Conditions of Approval to require the applicant to construct a new traffic signal at the intersection of Seventh Street and Cawston Avenue. Although the Planning Commission staff report identified the signal improvement in the staff report to the Planning Commission, the condition was inadvertently omitted from the final compiled list of conditions. The addition of Condition No. 87 ensures consistency with the traffic analysis, reflects staff ’s original recommendation, and maintains the full set of improvements necessary to support safe and efficient circulation in the project area. PUBLIC NOTICING AND COMMENTS (CITY COUNCIL): A 10-day notice of public hearing was advertised on June 26, 2026, in the Press Enterprise. In addition, notices of public hearing were mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. As of the writing of this staff report, no written correspondence has been received. CONCLUSION: The proposed project will produce a development of superior quality and excellence in design through a variety of proposed enhancements within the community. The modified development standards proposed within the PDP allows flexibility in site planning, while upholding the intentions and goals of the General Plan. Furthermore, the project is expected to cater to a different segment of the market that will be drawn to the community based on the smaller lot sizes, product types, and the overall project design. Based on this summary and the findings outlined in the report, staff, and the Planning Commission, support the project. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: This Project has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and State CEQA guidelines with the preparation of an Initial Study to determine the potential environmental impacts of the project. The Initial Study concluded that with applied mitigation the Project would not result in a significant effect on the environment with the inclusion of mitigation measures related to Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Noise, and Tribal Cultural Resources. The initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was circulated for a 30-day public comment period via the publication of a Notice of Intent on October 28, 2025. In addition to the publication, the IS/MND was submitted to the State Clearing House for posting (SCH No. 2025101241). During the course of the project review, the City received comment letters from the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), the Department of Conservation, individuals associated with Talley Meadows Layups and Retirement business, and Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER). While CEQA does not require a written response to comments on an MND, Staff elected to prepare responses to the comments on the Draft IS/MND as a matter of good public policy and transparency. Accordingly, a Final IS/MND (attached) includes written responses to all comments received during the review of the project up until the writing of this report. No new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts have been identified and therefore, staff determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was the appropriate CEQA document in support of the Project. The following is a brief summary of comments and responses: Department of Toxic Substances (DTSC). The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), provided recommendations regarding potential contaminants of concern (COCs). Response: As part of the MND a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was prepared, which did not identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs) requiring immediate subsurface investigation. However, additional soil sampling was also conducted, and no pesticides or heavy metals were detected in the shallow soil samples. Department of Conservation The Department of Conservation, provided advisory comments regarding the project’s potential conversion of Important Farmland. Response: This concern was previously evaluated in the Agriculture and Forestry Resources section of the City of San Jacinto General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The agricultural resource impacts associated with converting Important Farmland, including the infeasibility of preservation-based mitigation, were fully evaluated and disclosed in the General Plan 2040 EIR. Talley Meadows Ranch Talley Meadows Ranch provided concerns about traffic safety and pedestrian hazards on Cawston Avenue along the project frontage. Response: Issues related to the safety and functional design of the street frontage have been addressed through the engineering review and approval process, which ensures that all frontage improvements and design details comply with the City’s requirements and standards. The improvements required to address the traffic generated by the Project are included in the recommended Conditions of Approval for the Project. As mentioned above, the conditions require the applicant to widen both Seventh Street and Cawston Avenue and install improvement to each roadway that includes curb, gutter, sidewalk, streetlights and landscaping on west side of Cawston Avenue and the south side of Seventh Street. A preliminary signing and striping plan has been included in the staff report to illustrate how the traffic will circulate after the improvements have been installed, which has been review by the City Engineer to ensure traffic safety. In addition, a traffic signal will be required at the intersection of Cawston Avenue and Seventh Street which will enhance circulation. Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility In a letter from the Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER) dated March 24, 2026, SAFER asserted that the IS/MND is improper under CEQA due to its alleged failure to adequately assess the Project's potentially significant environmental impacts. SAFER requested an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on the basis that a fair argument exists that the Project may have adverse environmental impacts, and reserved the right to supplement the comment throughout the administrative process. Response: The comment letter did not identify any specific impacts, technical deficiencies, or evidence in support of its request for an EIR, and therefore does not provide substantial evidence supporting a fair argument under CEQA. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact to the General Fund by approving the project. As is typical with subdivisions, the project is conditioned to provide a funding mechanism for the ongoing maintenance of basins and parks within the project boundary. The funding mechanism is typically accomplished by annexation into a Community Facility District (CFD). The funding mechanism will ensure that the project does not rely on the General Fund to provide these services. In addition, the project will also provide a funding mechanism to support public safety throughout the Project and City, which is typically accomplished by annexation of the project site into an existing Public Safety CFD. Attachments Chacon_Farms_Final_ISMND_TTM_39076_5-26-26.pdf Tentative_Tract_Map_39076.pdf Planning_Commission_Recommended_Conditions_of_Approval.pdf Planning_Commission_Staff_Report_March_24_2026.pdf Resolution_-_PC_RESOLUTION_NO_26-01.pdf Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076 FINAL INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Case No. PROJ23-0029 City of San Jacinto Planning and Building Division 595 South San Jacinto Avenue San Jacinto, California 92583 Prepared By : 11801 Pierce Street, Suite 200 Riverside, CA 92505 January 7, 2026 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 1.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 2 1.0 CEQA Requirements Regarding Comments and Responses Section 15088 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines requires the Lead Agency—in this case, the City of San Jacinto—to evaluate and respond in good faith to all substantive comments concerning environmental issues that are submitted by public agencies or interested parties during the public review period for an Environmental Impact Report. The intent of this requirement is to ensure that the environmental record reflects meaningful consideration of public and agency input and that decision-makers are fully informed of environmental issues raised by reviewers before acting on the project. While CEQA does not require a written response to comments on a Mitigated Negative Declaration, the City of San Jacinto has elected to prepare responses received on the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft IS/MND) as a matter of good public policy and transparency. Accordingly, this Final IS/MND includes written responses to comments received during the public circulation period. 1.1 Public Review Process Consistent with Sections 15072 and 15073 of the CEQA Guidelines, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Chacon Farms Project (Tentative Tract Map No. 39076; Case No. PROJ23-0029) was circulated for public review and comment for a 30-day period beginning October 28, 2025, and ending November 27, 2025. The Notice was filed with Riverside County Clerk, published in a newspaper of general circulation, and distributed to interested agencies, organizations, and individuals in accordance with CEQA requirements. During this period, the Draft IS/MND and supporting technical studies were made available for review at San Jacinto City Hall (595 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California) and on the City’s Planning Division webpage at: https://www.sanjacintoca.gov/city_departments/community-development/planning/c_e_q_a Written comments received during the public review period are included in Section 2.0 of this Final IS/MND, followed by the City’s responses. The City of San Jacinto will consider this Final IS/MND—including all written comments and responses—prior to deciding whether to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve the Chacon Farms Project. 1.2 Supplemental Technical Studies In response to comments received during the public review period, supplemental technical studies have been prepared and are included as appendices to this Final IS/MND. These studies provide additional documentation substantiating the environmental analysis and conclusions of the Draft IS/MND. No revisions to the text of the Draft IS/MND were required. The supplemental studies include: § Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (Stantec, December 2025) § LESA Model Analysis Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 1.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 3 These additions constitute clarifying information that does not alter the environmental conclusions of the Draft IS/MND. CEQA Guidelines § 15073.5 provides the circumstances when a lead agency must recirculate a negative declaration and changes that do not require recirculation. Recirculation is required when the negative declaration must be substantially revised after being circulated for public comment. A “substantial revision” means: “(1) A new, avoidable significant effect is identified and mitigation measures or project revisions must be added in order to reduce the effect to insignificance, or (2) The lead agency determines that the proposed mitigation measures or project revisions will not reduce potential effects to less than significance and new measures or revisions must be required.” Recirculation is not required for any of the following revisions: 1.Mitigation measures are replaced with equal or more effective measures pursuant to Section 15074.1. 2.New project revisions are added in response to written or verbal comments on the project’s effects identified in the proposed negative declaration which are not new avoidable significant effects. 3.Measures or conditions of project approval are added after circulation of the negative declaration which are not required by CEQA, which do not create new significant environmental effects and are not necessary to mitigate an avoidable significant effect. 4.New information is added to the negative declaration which merely clarifies, amplifies, or makes insignificant modifications to the negative declaration. 5.None of the revisions result in new significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts. These additions constitute clarifying information pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15073.5(c)(4) and do not alter the environmental conclusions of the Draft IS/MND. Therefore, the conclusions of the Draft IS/MND remain valid, and recirculation under CEQA Guidelines §15073.5 is not required. Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 4 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses This section presents all written comments received during the public review period for the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft IS/MND) for the Chacon Farms Project, along with the City of San Jacinto’s written responses. Each comment letter has been assigned a unique identifier (e.g., Letter A, Letter B), and individual comments within each letter are numbered sequentially for reference (e.g., Comment A-1, A-2). Corresponding responses immediately follow each comment. The following comment letters were received by the City of San Jacinto. ■Comment Letter A: California Department of Toxic Substances Control, October 29, 2025 ■Comment Letter B: California Department of Conservation, November 18, 2025 ■Comment Letter C: Talley Meadows Ranch, November 18, 2025 ■Comment Letter D: Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER), March 24, 2026 ■Comment Letter E: Joe and Christy Talley, April 7, 2026 ■Comment Letter F: Michael and Emalee Tomoni, April 7, 2026 This section intentionally left blank Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 5 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 6 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 7 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 8 Responses To Letter A Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Comment A-1 DTSC notes that when agricultural land is proposed for residential use, contaminants such as organochlorine pesticides and arsenic may be present. DTSC recommends that the Lead Agency identify potential historical pesticide use and conduct sampling to determine if remediation is necessary. Response: The Project site is zoned Rural Residential (RR), and a zone change to Low Density Residential (LDR is proposed, so it has long been zoned for residential uses. Despite the zoning, the City acknowledges the site’s long-term agricultural use and DTSC’s recommendations regarding potential contaminants of concern (COCs). A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by Partner Engineering (September 2024) documented historical crop cultivation and possible use of fertilizers and pesticides but did not identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs) requiring immediate subsurface investigation. Although not required by the Phase I ESA, Stantec completed a Phase II ESA in November 2025, advancing 18 soil borings in a grid pattern (one per four acres) to a depth of 3 feet. Shallow samples collected at 0.5 feet were analyzed for OCPs and arsenic; all results were non-detect above laboratory reporting limits. While the arsenic reporting limit of 5.0 mg/kg exceeds the residential screening level of 0.68 mg/kg, arsenic occurs naturally in California soils at concentrations up to 12 mg/kg, and DTSC's HERO Note 11 recognizes background levels as the appropriate cleanup standard. Additionally, four borings in the area of historical livestock activity were extended to 15 feet and converted to dual-nested soil vapor probes for methane monitoring. Field readings collected in December 2025 detected methane at 310–500 ppmV, well below both the City of San Jacinto's 12,500 ppmV standard and the County Fire Authority's 5,000 ppmV threshold. Based on these results, neither the property's agricultural history nor its former livestock use constitutes a recognized environmental condition under ASTM E1527-21, and no further investigation is recommended. The Phase II ESA is attached as Appendix A. Although the site remains under active agricultural cultivation, only organic fertilizer (manure) is used to ensure that the sampling that has been performed continues to accurately represent soil conditions at the cessation of farming. Based on the Phase I ESA, Phase II ESA, and the owner’s commitment to use only organic fertilizer, no additional sampling is required. Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 9 Comment A-2. DTSC recommends all imported soil/fill be tested to ensure it meets applicable screening levels. Response: DTSC has not identified a new significant impact related to the project. The project applicant would obtain fill from sources that would prevent it from violating laws that would impose liability for contamination, such as the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, which regulates stormwater runoff. Under the California Building Code (Title 24, Chapter 17, § 1705.6.1), fill used to support foundations must be continuously inspected by a geotechnical engineer. The duties of the geotechnical engineer include the approval of soils to be used as fill material and the testing of the completed fills. One item the geotechnical engineer confirms is that the purchased soil has documentation from the seller that the soil is “clean” and suitable for residential purposes. In addition, the project is required to comply with Zoning Code section 17.325.060, which requires preparation of a soil management plan for landscape purposes, that includes submission to the City of San Jacinto. The City of San Jacinto requires as part of the soil management plan that an applicant submit soil samples to a qualified laboratory for analysis, encompassing soil texture, infiltration rate, pH, total soluble salts, sodium, and percent organic matter, along with mitigation recommendations. For phased or multi-lot development projects, a sampling rate of approximately 15% (one per seven lots) shall be deemed sufficient. The completed soil analysis report shall be incorporated into the Landscape and Irrigation Submittal Package or, where significant mass grading is proposed, submitted concurrent with the certificate of completion. Laboratory findings and recommendations shall be made available to qualified landscape and irrigation design professionals in a timely manner to inform any necessary plan modifications. Prior to project closeout, the applicant shall provide the City with written verification that all soil analysis recommendations have been implemented as a condition of project approval. Comment A-3 The City of San Jacinto should consider soil testing as mentioned in comment#1. If, in the event any COC results are above DTSC residential screening levels, DTSC recommends the City of San Jacinto address the contamination within the Project area through an Environmental Site Assessment and/or receive oversight from a self-certified local agency, DTSC or Regional Water Quality Control Board. Yaneli Hernandez 2026-01-06 16:31:03 -------------------------------------------- This section of the code addresses landscape requirements. The soil analysis referenced here evaluates soil texture, infiltration rate, pH, total soluble salts, percentage of organic matter, and related recommendations, which differs from the analysis requested by DTSC. Yaneli Hernandez 2026-01-06 16:33:08 --------------------------------------- ----- As noted in the previous comment, this section of the code addresses landscape requirements. Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 10 Response: Comment A-3 reiterates DTSC’s recommendation in Comment A-2 regarding investigation of soils potentially impacted by former agricultural uses. See Response A-1 and Response A-2. Comment A-4 DTSC would like to thank you for the opportunity to comment on the MND for the Chacon Farms Project. Thank you for your assistance in protecting California’s people and environment from the harmful effects of toxic substances. If you have any questions or would like clarification on DTSC’s comments, please respond to this letter or via our CEQA Review email for additional guidance. Response The City of San Jacinto appreciates the Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC) review and comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Chacon Farms Project. The City acknowledges DTSC’s continued efforts to protect public health and the environment. DTSC’s closing remarks are noted and will be included in the administrative record. No further revisions to the ISMND are warranted because no new or substantially more severe significant impacts have been identified. This section intentionally left blank Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 11 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 25 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 26 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 27 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 28 RESPONSES TO LETTER B DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION (DOC) Comment B-1: Introduction The DOC reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and provided advisory comments regarding the Project’s potential conversion of Important Farmland. The Department outlines its role in monitoring farmland resources, emphasizes that it is not taking a position on the Project, and offers general guidance on evaluating agricultural land impacts and potential mitigation options. Response B-1: The City appreciates the DOC’s clarification that its comments are advisory in nature and are intended to inform the CEQA process rather than advocate for or against the Project. As noted in the Department’s letter, the Department “respects local decision-making by informing the CEQA process and is not taking a position or providing legal or policy interpretation.” The City acknowledges this distinction and understands that the Department’s input is offered to identify resource considerations and potential assessment methodologies, and they do not constitute a directive or requirement for the City to implement particular measures, nor do they alter the City’s discretion to determine the significance of impacts or the feasibility of mitigation based on local circumstances and established policy. Comment B-2: Project Description DOC states that the Project proposes to subdivide three parcels via a Tentative Tract Map into 419 lots that will result in the development of 419 single-family detached residences, onsite roadways, open spaces and detention basin on 73.97 acres. The residential lots would be a minimum of 4,500 square feet. Residential structures would be 1 or 2 stories in height. Response B-2: The City acknowledges the Department's summary of the Project description. The final acreage of agricultural land converted is approximately 75.77 acres, and the Project involves a General Plan Amendment from Very Low Density Residential to Low Density Residential and Zone Change to permit Low Density Residential (LDR) development. For a full project description, see Section 3.1.4 of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 29 Comment B-3: Project Considerations The conversion of agricultural land represents a permanent reduction and impact to California’s agricultural land resources. The Department generally advises discussion of the following in any environmental review for the loss or conversion of agricultural land: ■Type, amount, and location of farmland conversion resulting directly and indirectly from implementation of the proposed project. ■Impacts on any current and future agricultural operations in the vicinity; e.g., land-use conflicts, increases in land values and taxes, loss of agricultural support infrastructure such as processing facilities, etc. ■Incremental impacts leading to cumulative impacts on agricultural land. This would include impacts from the proposed project, as well as impacts from past, current, and likely future projects. ■Implementation of any City or County Agricultural Mitigation Plans, Programs, or Policies. ■Proposed mitigation measures for impacted agricultural lands within the proposed project area. Response B-3 The City acknowledges the DOC's comment regarding potential indirect impacts and land-use conflicts associated with the Project. As discussed in Section 4.2, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, this issue was thoroughly evaluated in the certified Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH# 2020120312) for the General Plan Update, which the City Council adopted through Resolution No. 3949, on November 15, 2022: “The General Plan Update does not require the preservation of designated farmland; implementation of the General Plan Update could result in the conversion of farmland to non- agricultural uses. Any additional mitigation measures, such as the preservation of designated farmland, are not feasible and conflict with the other objectives of the General Plan Update, specifically to“ proactively plan for and accommodate local and regional growth in a responsible manner ”and “attract and retain businesses and industries that provide jobs for local residents,” and would potentially discourage future development envisioned in the General Plan Update. Although the General Plan Update includes policies and actions to support continued agricultural use within the Study Area, the potential for the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Yaneli Hernandez 2026-01-06 17:06:32 ------------------------------------ -------- Per our previous phone conversation, was it clarified in the environmental document that it is tiering off the GP EIR? Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 30 Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance as identified by the FMMP to non-agricultural use would be a significant unavoidable impact.”1 Under CEQA Guidelines §15168, program EIRs may serve as the foundation for later activities that implement the program, allowing subsequent CEQA documents to use and rely on the broader program-level analysis where appropriate. The General Plan Update considered residential uses on the Project site. The agricultural resource impacts associated with converting Important Farmland within the Planning Area, including the infeasibility of preservation-based mitigation, were fully evaluated and disclosed in the General Plan 2040 Program EIR. The Proposed Project does not introduce new agricultural impacts or increase the severity of those identified in the certified EIR. This conclusion is valid even though the City opted to prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project. Accordingly, the CEQA analysis for the Project for agricultural resources could have tiered from the General Plan 2040 Program EIR under CEQA §§15162 and 15168 because the Project would not have new or substantially more significant impacts on agricultural resources than anticipated by the General Plan Update Program EIR, and no additional agricultural mitigation measures are required. The Project also is consistent with General Plan policies related to managed growth. (General Plan, p.27.) As the General Plan notes, the City of San Jacinto anticipates substantial growth with the potential to change community character. (Id.) Policy LU-2.4 specifically anticipates new development on land used for agriculture. As discussed below, based on a stand-alone analysis of the Project’s impacts to agricultural resources, the Project would not have a significant impact on Important Farmland and does not require mitigation under CEQA. The information below supplements and amplifies the information in the Draft IS/MND. Project Specific LESA Analysis To evaluate site-specific agricultural viability, the City prepared a California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) Model analysis. The LESA Model, developed by the California Department of Conservation (DOC), is an optional quantitative tool available to lead agencies under CEQA for determining the significance of farmland conversion. The LESA assessment completed for the Chacon Farms Project confirms that the Project site is no longer situated within a viable agricultural environment and that the conversion of the site to residential use would not constitute a significant agricultural resource impact under LESA significance thresholds. The LESA Model is a point-based system combining two components: ■Land Evaluation (LE) – 50% of total score. ■Site Assessment (SA) – 50% of total score ■1 City Council Resolution No. 3949, November 15, 2022. Yaneli Hernandez 2026-01-06 17:16:21 -------------------------------------- ------ This sentence is confusing, didn't the agricultural section tier off the GP EIR? Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 31 The combined LE and SA sub scores generate a Final LESA Score (0–100). Significance thresholds are defined in Table 2, California LESA Model Scoring Thresholds. Table 1. California LESA Model Scoring Thresholds 00 Scoring Decision 0-39 Not Considered Significant 40-59 Significant only if both LE and SA ≥ 20 60-79 Considered Significant unless either LE or SA < 20 80-100 80–100 Considered Significant Land Evaluation (LE) Component (50%) LE focuses on two factors: Land Capability Classification (LCC) and Storie Index ratings, both reflecting soil qualities relevant to farming. Land Compatibility Classification LCC rates soils from I (best) to VIII (least suitable), with subclasses for specific limitations. Each property’s LCC Score is calculated by weighting class scores by acreage proportion; it makes up 25% of the total score. The LE score measures inherent soil quality based on the Storie Index and LCC ratings, derived from USDA Web Soil Survey data as shown in Exhibit 1, Important Farmland Map, for the Project site. This section intentionally left blank Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 32 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 33 Soil Ratings (LCC and Storie Index) The Project site is underlain by soils mapped as the Grangeville and Traver series. (See Exhibit 2, Soils Map. These soils are identified in the NRCS Web Soil Survey as having inherent limitations for agricultural production, including salinity, restricted drainage, and erosion susceptibility. These limitations influence agricultural productivity and are reflected in two standardized soil quality rating systems used by the LESA Model: Land Capability Classification (LCC) ■Rates soils from Class I (best) to Class VIII (least suitable). ■Higher numerical values indicate greater limitations for farming. ■For LESA scoring, each soil unit’s LCC rating is converted into a point value from 0 to 100 and then weighted by its percentage of the site. Storie Index Rating ■A 0–100 rating of soil quality based on profile characteristics, texture, slope, drainage, and limiting factors. ■Higher values indicate better inherent soil quality. ■Storie ratings are also weighted by acreage to generate a sitewide average. Because the site contains only four soil map units (GoB, GsB, Tp2, and Tr2), and because all four occur across the entire 100% Area of Interest (AOI), the weighted averages represent the overall soil quality for the site. Table 2. Soil Map Units, LCC Ratings, and Storie Index Values Soil Map Units % of AOI LCC Rating (Points) LCC Weighted Score (×0.25) Storie Index Storie Weighted Score (×0.25) Total LCC and Storie Subscore GoB, GsB, Tp2, Tr2 100% 49.44 12.36 46.03 11.51 23.87 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 34 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 35 Site Assessment (SA) Component (50%) The Site Assessment (SA) component of the LESA Model evaluates non-soil factors that influence the agricultural viability of a site, including parcel size, water availability, surrounding agricultural lands, and the presence of protected agricultural or conservation areas. These factors collectively represent 50 percent of the total LESA score. The SA analysis for the Project site is based on the Zone of Influence (ZOI), defined as the 0.5-mile area surrounding the site, consistent with DOC methodology. Exhibit 3, Zone of Influence Map illustrates the 0.5-mile ZOI used to assess surrounding agricultural land conditions, fragmentation, and adjacent to urban or non-agricultural uses. Exhibit 4, Protected Resources Map shows any Williamson Act enrolled lands, conservation easements, and other protected agricultural resource lands relative to the Project site. This section intentionally left blank Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 36 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 37 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 38 Table 3. Site Assessment Scoring Summary SA Factor Rationale Score Weight Weighted Score Project Size (75.7 acres) Large parcel size supports higher agricultural resource value 100 0.15 15.00 Water Resource Availability EMWD UWMP prioritizes M&I demand; agricultural water unreliable; capped well not viable 0 0.15 0.00 Surrounding Agricultural Land Aerials show fragmentation/urban conversion in ZOI 10 0.15 1.50 Protected Resource Land No Williamson Act, no Criteria Cell, <0.01% protected 0 0.05 0.00 SA Subscore Total — — — 16.50 Scoring Assumptions and Supporting Justification Water Resource Availability (0 points): Based on EMWD’s 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, agricultural water deliveries are not reliably available or economically feasible due to prioritization of municipal/industrial demand, tiered pricing, and replenishment assessments. The capped on-site well is not a guaranteed long-term agricultural supply. Surrounding Agricultural Land (10 points): ZOI analysis and current aerial imagery show substantial urbanization, in the project area and cleared land to the west/north, indicating fragmentation and loss of agricultural support services. Protected Resource Lands (0 points): The site is not under a Williamson Act contract and is not located within an MSHCP Criteria Cell or other protected resource designation. Final LESA Score and Significance Determination §LE Sub score: 23.87 §SA Sub score: 16.50 §Final LESA Score: 40.37 Under the LESA scoring system, a score of 40–59 is considered significant only if both LE and SA sub scores are ≥ 20. Because the SA Sub score (16.50) is below 20, the Project’s Final LESA Score of 40.37 is not considered significant under the LESA Model. As supported by the analysis in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Project-specific LESA analysis above, the Project would not indirectly result in farmland conversion. The Project site is already in an area with fragmented farmland and would not increase the likelihood of the conversion of surrounding farmland. The Project also does not impact existing or future agricultural operations in the vicinity, mainly because the land immediately surrounding the Project site is not currently used for agricultural purposes, (confirmed through review of current Yaneli Hernandez 2026-01-06 17:52:34 -------------------------------------------- How was this confirmed? Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 39 aerial imagery and jurisdictional GIS/General Plan land use mapping within the 0.5-mile zone of influence [see Exhibit 3]). The nearest active agricultural operation is a dairy located to the south of Esplanade Avenue in the City of Hemet, which has a General Plan Land Use designation of Neighborhood Commercial (NC), and Medium Density Residential (MDR). Thus, all land surrounding the Project Site has land use designations that allow non-agricultural uses. The Project is not near any land protected by Williamson Act contracts and would not result in the cancellation of such a contract. Accordingly, the Project would have less than significant impacts to agricultural resources and no mitigation is required. Comment B-4: Mitigating Agricultural Land Loss or Conversion Consistent with CEQA Guidelines, the Department advises that the environmental review address mitigation for the loss or conversion of agricultural land. The Department urges consideration of any other feasible measures necessary to mitigate project impacts. Response B-4: The Project's finding of Less Than Significant Impact to agricultural resources is supported by the analysis in the Draft IS/MND (Section 4.2, Agriculture and Forestry Resources). It also is supported by the LESA threshold analysis above, and by the application of CEQA tiering principles. See Response B-3. Comment B-5: Conclusion and Request for Notices and Documents Thank you for giving us the opportunity to comment on the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Chacon Farms Project. Please provide the Department with notices of any future hearing dates as well as any staff reports pertaining to this project. Response B-5: The City acknowledges the DOC’s gratitude and request for ongoing notifications. The DOC will be provided with notices of any future public hearings, and any staff reports pertaining to the Chacon Farms Project in accordance with CEQA statutes and guidelines. Finding: The comments do not identify any new significant environmental impacts, do not demonstrate that previously identified impacts would be substantially more severe than disclosed in the Draft IS/MND, and do not require the addition of new or considerably different mitigation measures or project alternatives. Accordingly, the City finds that recirculation of the IS/MND is not required under CEQA Guidelines §15088.5. Yaneli Hernandez 2026-01-06 18:30:02 -------------------------------------------- This sentence appears disconnected from the paragraph above. Consider revising it so it flows more clearly with the surrounding text. Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 40 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 41 Responses To Letter C Talley Meadows Ranch Comment: Improve Cawston Avenue for Pedestrian and Traffic Safety The commenter expressed concern about traffic safety and pedestrian hazards on Cawston Avenue along the project frontage. They noted that the street is currently one lane each way with a drainage ditch on one side, and this bottleneck is a serious safety concern given the presence of three schools nearby and the traffic generated by their horse ranch. The commenter felt it was "imperative" to widen and improve Cawston Avenue to match the configuration north of 7th Street and south of Esplanade Avenue Response: The City acknowledges the commenter's concern regarding pedestrian and traffic safety, including the current existing two-lane undivided condition of Cawston Avenue. However, the comment does not raise an issue on the adequacy of the CEQA document, which indicates that the Project would not create a new traffic safety hazard. (See Draft IS/MND section 4.17.2.c.) As documented in the Draft Transportation Impact Study, Cawston Avenue is classified as a major roadway and is operating well below its available capacity, with no existing operational or safety deficiencies identified along the project frontage. Traffic operations along Cawston Avenue, including roadway segments and study intersections, currently operate at acceptable levels of service consistent with City standards, and the project would not degrade roadway performance or introduce unsafe conditions. Issues related to the safety and functional design of the street frontage also will be addressed during the Tentative Tract Map (No. 39076) engineering review and approval process, which ensures that any frontage improvements or design details comply with the City’s adopted roadway, pedestrian, and safety standards. While the comment does not raise an issue regarding the adequacy of the Draft IS/MND and therefore does not require a written response under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements, the City provides the following response for informational purposes. Required Off-Site Frontage Improvements Cawston Avenue is classified as a major roadway by the City of San Jacinto. To address the existing non-standard condition and ensure the Project conforms to the City’s Major Thoroughfare Standards, the Project is required to implement the following off-site frontage improvements adjacent to the west side of Cawston Avenue as Conditions of Approval: ■Addition of one travel lane. ■Construction of a standard sidewalk to enhance pedestrian safety. ■Construction of a 12-foot-wide parkway. ■Construction of a curb and gutter section. Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 42 ■Widening of the roadway section to fully conform to the City's Major Roadway Standards. These specific improvements are mandated by City Engineering after their review of Tentative Tract Map No. 39076. The scope of work listed above constitutes the full extent of the Project's required commitment for its direct frontage, ensuring compliance with all applicable City Ordinances. The requirement to add a travel lane addresses the commenter’s concern with narrow streets and “bottlenecks.” The addition of a lane also allows slower vehicles to be in a separate lane than faster vehicles. The requirement to add a sidewalk addresses the commenter’s concern about pedestrian safety. Finding: The comments do not identify any new significant environmental impacts, do not demonstrate that previously identified impacts would be substantially more severe than disclosed in the Draft IS/MND, and do not require the addition of new or considerably different mitigation measures or project alternatives. Accordingly, the City finds that recirculation of the IS/MND is not required under CEQA Guidelines §15088.5. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Chacon Farms Project Approximately 73.97 Acres of Land Southwest of Seventh Street and Cawston Avenue San Jacinto, California December 16, 2025 Stantec Project Number: 185807160 Prepared for: Chacon, LLC 1281 North State Street, Suite A-536 San Jacinto, California 92583 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 735 East Carnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, California 92408 Appendix A PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT This document entitled Phase II Environmental Site Assessment was prepared by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (“Stantec”) for the account of Chacon, LLC (the “Client”). Any reliance on this document by any third party is strictly prohibited. The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. In preparing the document, Stantec did not verify information supplied to it by others. Any use which a third party makes of this document is the responsibility of such third party. Such third party agrees that Stantec shall not be responsible for costs or damages of any kind, if any, suffered by it or any other third party as a result of decisions made or actions taken based on this document. Prepared by (signature) Alicia Jansen Senior Scientist Reviewed by (signature) Jim DeWoody Principal Scientist Approved by (signature) Kyle Emerson, CEG Managing Principal Geologist PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 1.1 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1.1 1.1 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 1.1 2.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION ................................................................................................ 2.1 2.1 PRE-DRILLING ACTIVITIES .......................................................................................... 2.1 2.2 INVESTIGATION ............................................................................................................ 2.1 2.2.1 Soil Boring and Sampling Procedures ........................................................... 2.1 2.2.2 Soil Vapor Probe Construction ....................................................................... 2.2 2.2.3 Field Equipment Cleaning Procedures .......................................................... 2.2 3.0 TESTING PROCEDURES ............................................................................................. 3.1 3.1 SOIL SAMPLING METHODOLOGY .............................................................................. 3.1 3.2 METHANE SAMPLING METHODOLOGY ..................................................................... 3.1 4.0 INVESTIGATION RESULTS .......................................................................................... 4.1 4.1 FIELD OBSERVATIONS ................................................................................................ 4.1 4.2 METHANE SAMPLE RESULTS ..................................................................................... 4.1 4.3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS ................................................................................................ 4.1 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................. 5.1 6.0 LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................ 6.1 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 – Summary of Soil Analytical Results Table 2 – Summary of Methane Survey Results LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 – Subject Property Location Map Figure 2 – Soil Boring Locations LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A – Laboratory Data Sheets PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT i Executive Summary On behalf of Chacon, LLC, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec) has prepared this Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report for the property located southwest of Seventh Street and Cawston Avenue in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, California (the Subject Property; Figure 1). The investigation was performed based on the scope of work set forth in Stantec’s proposal entitled Proposal for Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), dated November 13, 2025. Chacon, LLC (the “User”) has been designated as the User of this report. The Subject Property consists of approximately 73.97 acres of agricultural land. With respect to the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (ISMND) submitted for public and agency input, the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) concluded that, based on review of historical documents including aerial photographs and topographic maps, the Subject Property appears to have been utilized for agricultural use. Due to the potential for residual agricultural chemicals to be present in shallow soils, DTSC requested sampling and analysis of shallow soil for the presence of residual organochloride pesticides (OCPs) and heavy metals (arsenic). To investigate this concern expressed by the DTSC, Stantec completed a Phase II ESA at the Subject Property in November of 2025, which included the following scope of work: • Stantec advanced one (1) boring per four (4) acres in a grid pattern across the 73 acres of agricultural land at the Subject Property. Based on the grid sampling, a total of eighteen (18) soil borings were advanced to a maximum depth of 3 feet below ground surface (bgs) throughout the Subject Property. Soil samples were collected at 0.5 feet bgs depth intervals for analysis of OCPs and arsenic. Accordingly, 18 shallow soil samples collected from the 0.5-foot intervals were submitted to the laboratory for analysis of OCPs and arsenic. The remaining 18 deeper soil samples collected from 2.5- 3.0 feet were submitted to the laboratory and placed on hold, pending the results of the shallow analysis of OCPs and arsenic (to determine whether further analysis was warranted). • Four (4) of the 18 soil borings (SB-9 through SB-12) were further advanced to a maximum depth of 15-ft bgs in the area with historical livestock activities and converted into dual-nested soil vapor probes at 5- and 15-ft bgs for a methane survey (See Figure 2 for locations). The laboratory reported no detections of OCPs or arsenic above the laboratory reporting limit in any of the soil samples submitted for analysis (i.e., the results were “non-detect”), as presented in Table 1. The laboratory reporting limit for arsenic was 5.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), which exceeded regulatory thresholds for residential soil set at 0.68 mg/kg (Appendix A). However, arsenic occurs naturally in soil throughout the State of California at levels of up to 12 mg/kg and, therefore, commonly exceeds the regulatory threshold due to naturally-occurring conditions. Accordingly, the State of California typically uses the background level, as presented in DTSC’s HERO Note 11, as the cleanup standard for arsenic. No arsenic was detected in any of the soil samples collected at the Subject Property at concentrations exceeding applicable cleanup levels. PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT ii The soil vapor probes were installed by directly pushing them into the ground. Based on the DTSC guidance, the installed vapor probes were allowed to set for at least two (2) hours prior to sampling to allow the seals to set. Probe pressure readings were recorded on field data sheets prior to sample collection or purging. Prior to sample collection, three tubing volumes were purged through a pump at a flow rate of 150-200 ml/minute. After purging was complete, the surface-end of the Teflon tubing was connected to a RKI Eagle, and soil vapor was drawn through the device and analyzed on site for methane, hydrogen sulfide, oxygen, and carbon monoxide. Field readings were collected on two days (December 4 and 5, 2025) at least 24 hours apart. The field readings showed methane detections ranging from 310 to 500 parts per million by volume (ppmV), which levels are significantly below the standard expressed by the City of San Jacinto, which was 12,500 ppmV, and also significantly below the other published County Fire Authority standard of 5,000 ppmV (Table 2). Additionally, oxygen and carbon dioxide percentages showed solid correlation and are typical of aerobic conditions in the soil. Based on these results, the Subject Property’s historical agricultural and livestock uses are not considered a recognized environmental condition (REC) pursuant to ASTM E1527-21 or a concern in relation to the contemplated redevelopment of the Subject Property for residential purposes. Therefore, Stantec recommends no further investigation regarding these issues, or in regard to the environmental condition of the Subject Property. PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 1.1 1.0 INTRODUCTION On behalf of Chacon, LLC, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec) has prepared this Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report for the property located southwest of Seventh Street and Cawston Avenue in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, California (the “Subject Property”; Figure 1). The investigation was performed based on the scope of work set forth in Stantec’s proposal entitled Proposal for Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, dated November 13, 2025. Chacon, LLC (the “User”) has been designated as the User of this report. 1.1 BACKGROUND The Subject Property consists of approximately 73.97 acres of agricultural land. The Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (ISMND) was submitted for public and agency input and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) concluded, based on review of historical documents, including aerial photographs and topographic maps, that the Subject Property appears to have been utilized for agricultural use. Due to the potential for residual agricultural chemicals to be present in shallow soils, DTSC requested that shallow soils be sampled and analyzed in order to determine whether residual organochloride pesticides (OCPs) or heavy metals (arsenic) were present above applicable regulatory thresholds for residential use. Accordingly, to address DTSC’s concern, Stantec completed a Phase II ESA at the Subject Property in November 2025. The results of that investigation are presented in the following sections of this report and, as discussed in detail, have concluded that the historical agricultural use of the Subject Property represents neither a recognized environmental condition nor a human health risk in contemplation of the proposed residential development of the Subject Property. PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 2.1 2.0 FIELD INVESTIGATION Prior to the commencement of fieldwork activities, Stantec made the following preparations. 2.1 PRE-DRILLING ACTIVITIES • Stantec visited the Property to mark the proposed boring locations. Subsequent to the marking, Underground Service Alert (USA) was notified at least 72-hours prior to the commencement of drilling activities; and, • In accordance with federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations (29 CFR, Section 1910.120), Stantec generated a site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) for the Property. All Stantec personnel and subcontractors associated with the project were required to be familiar with and comply with all provisions of the HASP. 2.2 INVESTIGATION To address the requested work by the DTSC outlined above, Stantec completed a Limited Phase II ESA in November 2025. Stantec provided the services of a field geologist to supervise and direct the advancement of multiple soil, and soil vapor borings at the Property. All work was conducted under the direct oversight of a State of California professional and included the following: • Stantec advanced one (1) boring per four (4) acres in a grid pattern across the 73 acres of agricultural land at the Subject Property. Based on the grid sampling a total of eighteen (18) soil borings were advanced to a maximum depth of 3 foot below ground surface (bgs) throughout the Subject Property. Soil samples were collected at 0.5 feet bgs depth intervals for analysis of OCPs and arsenic. The 18 shallow soil samples collected from the 0.5-foot intervals were submitted to the laboratory for analysis of OCPs and arsenic. The remaining 18 deeper soil samples collected from 2.5- 3.0 feet were submitted to the laboratory and placed on hold, pending the results of the shallow analysis of OCPs and arsenic. • Four (4) of the 18 soil borings (SB-9 through SB-12) were further advanced to a maximum depth of 15-ft bgs in the area with historical livestock activities and converted into dual-nested soil vapor probes at 5- and 15-ft bgs for a methane survey (See Figure 2 for locations). 2.2.1 Soil Boring and Sampling Procedures Each pesticide boring location was drilled with a hand auger to a depth of three (3) feet below ground surface (bgs) to clear the location of utilities and collect the required soil samples. Soil samples collected within the upper three (3) feet were collected by discharging the hand auger contents directly into pre- cleaned laboratory-provided eight-ounce glass jars with Teflon®-lined lids. All sample containers were labeled with the appropriate identification information (boring number, sample depth, sample collection PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 2.2 date, and sample collection time). After collection the soil samples were placed in an iced cooler for preservation until delivery to the laboratory. 2.2.2 Soil Vapor Probe Construction The soil vapor probes were installed in general accordance with the methodologies outlined in the July 2015 California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) “Advisory - Active Soil Gas Investigations” (DTSC Advisory). Four additional soil borings (SB-9 through SB-12) were further advanced into native soils to a depth of 15 feet bgs with a Geoprobe drilling rig that utilized a hydraulically driven direct push system equipped with 1.5-inch outer diameter rods. Following the advancement of the borings to the terminal depth, the vapor sampling probe were installed in the borehole with sampling screens positioned at 5- and 15-feet bgs and connecting the screen up to the ground surface via dedicated Teflon tubing. The annulus around the exposed sampling screens was backfilled with a silica sand pack to an elevation of approximately six inches above the sampling interval. Above the filter pack, a 12-inch transition seal was constructed using fine bentonite granules. From that point to ground surface, hydrated bentonite granules will be utilized to seal the annular space. At the surface, the exposed Teflon tubing was capped with tight fitting plastic end-caps and labeled to indicate sampling depth. 2.2.3 Field Equipment Cleaning Procedures To maintain quality control during drilling operations, all drill rods and reusable soil sampling equipment was decontaminated using a triple bucket rinse. Prior to drilling at a given location or sampling interval, all equipment coming in direct contact with soil samples was scrubbed with an Alconox scrub solution followed by a clean tap water rinse and then a final distilled water rinse. PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 3.1 3.0 TESTING PROCEDURES 3.1 SOIL SAMPLING METHODOLOGY All chemical analyses was performed at State of California-certified laboratories. Collected soil samples were analyzed at Jones Environmental, Inc. (Jones) located in Santa Fe Springs, California. All samples were managed under strict chain-of-custody. The soil results are discussed below and presented in Table 1. Complete laboratory reports, including QA/QC documentation is included in Appendix A. 3.2 METHANE SAMPLING METHODOLOGY The soil vapor probes were allowed to set for at least two (2) hours prior to sampling to allow the seals to set. Probe pressure readings were recorded on field data sheets prior to sample collection or purging. Prior to sample collection, three tubing volumes were purged through a pump at a flow rate of 150-200 ml/minute. After purging was complete, the surface-end of the Teflon tubing was connected to a RKI Eagle and soil vapor was drawn through the device and analyzed on site for methane, hydrogen sulfide, oxygen, and carbon monoxide. The survey included two rounds of field sampling performed 24-hours apart – one round on December 4, 2025, and the second round of sampling was performed on December 5, 2025. PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 4.1 4.0 INVESTIGATION RESULTS 4.1 FIELD OBSERVATIONS On November 20, 2025, Stantec personnel oversaw the advancement of eighteen (18) soil borings at the Subject Property (A1-0.5 through F3-0.5) to 3-ft bgs and four (4) borings (SB-9 through SB-12) to 15-ft bgs. Soils encountered during this round of assessment consisted of silty sand to clayey sands. No staining or odor was observed in any of the borings advanced during this assessment. All boring locations are depicted on Figure 2. 4.2 METHANE SAMPLE RESULTS Field readings were collected on two days (December 4 and 5, 2025) at least 24 hours apart. The field readings showed methane detections ranging from 310 to 500 parts per million by volume (ppmV) which is significantly below the verbal City of San Jacinto standard of 12,500 ppmV and published County Fire Authority Standard of 5,000 ppmV (Table 2). Additionally, oxygen and carbon dioxide percentages showed solid correlation and are typical of aerobic conditions in the soil. 4.3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS Laboratory analytical test results from this assessment are attached as Appendix A. A summary of the analytical data from this assessment is provided in Tables 1 and 2. The laboratory test results from this phase of investigation are discussed below. All soil boring locations from this assessment are presented on Figure 2. Soil Results The laboratory reported that there were no detections of OCPs or arsenic above the laboratory reporting limit in any of the soil samples submitted for analysis (i.e., the results were “non-detect”) as presented in Table 1. The laboratory reporting limit for arsenic was 5.0 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), which exceeded regulatory thresholds for residential soil set at 0.68 mg/kg (Appendix A). However, arsenic occurs naturally in soil throughout the State of California at levels of up to 12 mg/kg and, therefore, commonly exceeds the regulatory threshold due to naturally-occurring conditions. Accordingly, the State of California typically uses the background level, as presented in DTSC’s HERO Note 11, as the cleanup standard for arsenic and no arsenic was detected at the Subject Property at concentrations exceeding applicable cleanup levels. PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 5.1 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS There were no methane detections in the former livestock areas at concentrations exceeding typical levels of concern (generally considered to be 0.5% by volume, or 5,000 parts per million by volume [ppmV] methane) – or above standards articulated by the City of San Jacinto or other County Fire Authority. Accordingly, based on the data, and in light of the contemplated redevelopment of the Subject Property for residential purposes, Stantec anticipates no further action or investigation regarding methane in soil vapor at the Subject Property. Based on these results, the Subject Property’s historical agricultural use is not considered a recognized environmental condition (REC) or a concern to contemplated redevelopment for residential purposes, nor are the former livestock areas, and Stantec recommends no further investigation regarding these issues – or in regard to the environmental condition of the of the Subject Property. PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 6.1 6.0 LIMITATIONS The conclusions presented in this report are professional opinions based on data described in this report. The opinions of this report have been arrived at in accordance with currently accepted hydrogeologic and engineering standards and practices applicable to this location and are subject to the following inherent limitations. Stantec makes no other warranty, either expressed or implied, concerning the conclusions and professional advice that is contained within the body of this report. Inherent in most projects performed in a heterogeneous subsurface environment, continuing excavation and assessments may reveal findings that are different than those presented herein. This facet of the environmental profession should be considered when formulating professional opinions on the limited data collected on these projects. This report has been issued with the clear understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or their representative, to make appropriate notifications to regulatory agencies. It is specifically not the responsibility of Stantec to conduct appropriate notifications as specified by current County and State regulations. The information presented in this report is valid as of the date our exploration was performed. Site conditions may degrade with time; consequently, the findings presented herein are subject to change. PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT TABLES Table 1 Summary of Soil Analytical Results - 2025 Pesticides by EPA 8081A, Metals by EPA 6010B Chacon Farm Site - West 7th Street and Cawston Ave, San Jacinto, California Stantec Job No.: 185807160 Sample Location Sample ID Depth (1) Date Pesticides (EPA Test Method 8081A) Metals (EPA Test Method 6010B) 4,4'-DDD 4,4'-DDE 4,4'-DDT Total DDT Compounds Toxaphene Other OCPs Arsenic Total STLC (2) Screening Levels for residential soil (3) 2.3 2.0 1.9 NE 0.45 varies 0.11 (4) -- Hazardous Waste Levels 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 NE varies 500 5.0 Typical Background Levels in California NE NE NE NE NE NE 0.6-11.8 (4) -- Soil Samples N o F r i t e h l e d r n A1-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA A2-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA A3-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA B1-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA B2-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA B3-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA C1-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA C2-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA C3-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA S o F u i t h e e l r d n D1-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA D2-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA D3-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA E1-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA E2-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA E3-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA F1-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA F2-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA F3-0.5 0.5 11/20/2025 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.030 < 20.0 <varies < 5.0 NA NOTES: ABBREVIATIONS: All concentrations reported in milligrams of metal per kilogram of soil (mg/kg) DTSC - Department of Toxic Substances Control (1) Sample depth is reported as feet below ground surface HERO - Human and Ecological Risk Office (2) Screening level value is determined by the more conservative value from the California DTSC HERO Note 3, updated March 2025 or USEPA RSLs, updated November 2024 NA - Not analyzed ND - Not detected (3) Arsenic has been found to exist in naturally in soils up to 22 mg/kg in the state of California. It is generally considered acceptable at concentrations of 12 mg/Kg or less NE - Not established STLC - Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration (4) Chernoff G., Bosan W., and Oudiz B., DTSC, Determination of a Southern California Regional Background Arsenic Concentration in Soil USEPA RSL - United States Environmental Protection Agency Regional Screening Levels, residential use. < -Indicates the concentration was not detected above the laboratory method reporting limit. BOLD - Indicates the concentration is above the laboratory reporting level Concentration exceeds USEPA Region 9 RSL or DTSC Hero Note 3 Concentration exceeds Southern California regional background levels Concentration exceed the California Hazardous Waste Level Table 2 Summary of Methane Survey Results - 2025 Chacon Farm Site - West 7th Street and Cawston Ave, San Jacinto, California Stantec Job No.: 185807161 Boring Location Sample ID Sample Depth Below Ground Surface (feet) Sample Date Pressure (Inches of Water) Methane (ppmV) Oxygen (%) Carbon Monoxide (ppm) Hydrogen Sulfide (ppm) Orange County Standard (Mandatory Procedures for Mitigation, as contained herein, shall be applied to all buildings within 300 feet of the affected location(s). NE 5,000 NE NE NE Orange County Standard (all buildings within 300 feet of the affected location(s) shall have a specific soil gas mitigation plan approved by a Registered Professional.) NE 12,500 NE NE NE City of San Jacinto Standard (Quoted by City of San Jacinto Field Inspector) NE 12,500 NE NE NE Northern Portion of Chacon Farms SB9-5 5 12/4/2025 0.0 410 19.4 0 0 12/5/2025 -0.1 390 19.5 0 0 SB9-15 15 12/4/2025 0.0 390 18.8 0 0 12/5/2025 0.0 370 18.8 0 0 SB10-5 5 12/4/2025 0.0 460 20.2 0 0 12/5/2025 0.0 490 19.7 0 0 SB10-15 15 12/4/2025 0.12 460 19.5 0 0 12/5/2025 0.12 500 19.2 0 0 SB11-5 5 12/4/2025 0.0 370 16.7 0 0 12/5/2025 0.0 370 16.8 0 0 SB11-15 15 12/4/2025 0.0 -- -- -- -- 12/5/2025 -0.22 -- -- -- -- SB12-5 5 12/4/2025 0.0 390 14.4 0 0 12/5/2025 0.0 390 14.9 0 0 SB12-15 15 12/4/2025 0.0 330 13 0 0 12/5/2025 0.0 310 13 0 0 Notes: All concentrations reported in parts per million by volume (ppmV) Sample analyzed by Eagle Field Meter. -- Not Analyzed NE - Not Established Light gray shading indicates value at or above the Orange County residential screening level. Light gray shading indicates value at or above the City of San Jacinto residential screening level. PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT FIGURES SUBJECT PROPERTY 0 1000 2000 3000 4000FT SCALE : AS SHOWN NOTE: THIS DRAWING ILLUSTRATES SUPPORTING INFORMATION SPECIFIC TO A STANTEC SERVICES INC. REPORT AND MUST NOT BE USED FOR OTHER PURPOSES. 185807160 SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION MAP PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT SOUTHWEST OF SEVENT STREET AND CAWSTON AVENUE, SAN JACINTO, CA CHACON, LLC AS SHOWN 25/12/13 1 CD OK SC2025120014 KE © 2025 A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 C1 C2 C3 D1 D2 D3 E1 E2 E3 F1 F2 F3 LEGEND APPROXIMATE SUBJECT PROPERTY BOUNDARY SOIL BORING LOCATIONS - STANTEC, NOVEMBER, 2025 0 200 400 600 800FT NOTE: THIS DRAWING ILLUSTRATES SUPPORTING INFORMATION SPECIFIC TO A STANTEC CONSULTING LTD. REPORT AND MUST NOT BE USED FOR OTHER PURPOSES. SOIL BORING LOCATIONS PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT S O U T H W E S© 2025 SB9 SB10 SB11 SB12 T OF SEVENT STREET AND CAWSTON AVENUE, SAN JACINTO, CA CHACON, LLC 185807160 AS SHOWN 25/12/13 SC2025120015 OK KE SCALE : AS SHOWN 2 CD PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT APPENDIX A LABORATORY DATA SHEETS Logo 02 December 2025 Jim DeWoody Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Re: Chacon Farms Enclosed are the results of analyses for samples received by the laboratory on 11/21/25. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Colby Wakeman Lab Director 1 of 41 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 2 of 41 Stantec Consulting Project: Chacon Farms 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project Number: Project Manager: 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 ANALYTICAL REPORT FOR SAMPLES Sample ID Laboratory ID Matrix Date Sampled Date Received A1-0.5 J254478-001 Soil 11/20/2025 09:06 11/21/2025 16:19 A2-0.5 J254478-002 Soil 11/20/2025 07:53 11/21/2025 16:19 A3-0.5 J254478-003 Soil 11/20/2025 07:49 11/21/2025 16:19 B1-0.5 J254478-007 Soil 11/20/2025 00:00 11/21/2025 16:19 B2-0.5 J254478-008 Soil 11/20/2025 07:58 11/21/2025 16:19 B3-0.5 J254478-009 Soil 11/20/2025 07:44 11/21/2025 16:19 C1-0.5 J254478-013 Soil 11/20/2025 09:16 11/21/2025 16:19 C2-0.5 J254478-014 Soil 11/20/2025 08:02 11/21/2025 16:19 C3-0.5 J254478-015 Soil 11/20/2025 07:36 11/21/2025 16:19 D1-0.5 J254478-019 Soil 11/20/2025 09:21 11/21/2025 16:19 D2-0.5 J254478-020 Soil 11/20/2025 08:26 11/21/2025 16:19 D3-0.5 J254478-021 Soil 11/20/2025 07:30 11/21/2025 16:19 E1-0.5 J254478-025 Soil 11/20/2025 09:26 11/21/2025 16:19 E2-0.5 J254478-026 Soil 11/20/2025 08:32 11/21/2025 16:19 E3-0.5 J254478-027 Soil 11/20/2025 07:20 11/21/2025 16:19 F1-0.5 J254478-031 Soil 11/20/2025 09:32 11/21/2025 16:19 F2-0.5 J254478-032 Soil 11/20/2025 08:37 11/21/2025 16:19 F3-0.5 J254478-033 Soil 11/20/2025 07:21 11/21/2025 16:19 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 3 of 41 DETECTIONS SUMMARY Sample ID: A1-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-001 No Results Detected Sample ID: A2-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-002 No Results Detected Sample ID: A3-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-003 No Results Detected Sample ID: B1-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-007 No Results Detected Sample ID: B2-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-008 No Results Detected Sample ID: B3-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-009 No Results Detected Sample ID: C1-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-013 Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 4 of 41 No Results Detected Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 5 of 41 DETECTIONS SUMMARY Sample ID: C2-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-014 No Results Detected Sample ID: C3-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-015 No Results Detected Sample ID: D1-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-019 No Results Detected Sample ID: D2-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-020 No Results Detected Sample ID: D3-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-021 No Results Detected Sample ID: E1-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-025 No Results Detected Sample ID: E2-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-026 Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 6 of 41 No Results Detected Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 7 of 41 DETECTIONS SUMMARY Sample ID: E3-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-027 No Results Detected Sample ID: F1-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-031 No Results Detected Sample ID: F2-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-032 No Results Detected Sample ID: F3-0.5 Laboratory ID: J254478-033 No Results Detected Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 8 of 41 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 9 of 41 A1-0.5 J254478-001(Soil) EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2511466 11/26/25 EPA 6010 EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512017 11/26/25 EPA 8081 beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Surrogate: TCMX 89.85 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 102.74 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 10 of 41 A2-0.5 J254478-002(Soil) EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2511466 11/26/25 EPA 6010 EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512017 11/26/25 EPA 8081 beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Surrogate: TCMX 73.89 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 83.63 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 11 of 41 A3-0.5 J254478-003(Soil) EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2511466 11/26/25 EPA 6010 EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512017 11/26/25 EPA 8081 beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Surrogate: TCMX 93.51 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 108.43 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 12 of 41 B1-0.5 J254478-007(Soil) EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010 EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512017 11/26/25 EPA 8081 beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Surrogate: TCMX 88.90 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 101.15 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 13 of 41 B2-0.5 J254478-008(Soil) EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010 EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512017 11/26/25 EPA 8081 beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Surrogate: TCMX 86.55 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 97.61 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 14 of 41 B3-0.5 J254478-009(Soil) EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010 EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512017 11/26/25 EPA 8081 beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Surrogate: TCMX 87.56 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 97.50 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 15 of 41 C1-0.5 J254478-013(Soil) EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010 EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512017 11/26/25 EPA 8081 beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Surrogate: TCMX 88.51 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 100.66 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 16 of 41 C2-0.5 J254478-014(Soil) EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010 EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512017 11/26/25 EPA 8081 beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Surrogate: TCMX 84.83 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 98.13 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 17 of 41 C3-0.5 J254478-015(Soil) EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010 EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512018 11/26/25 EPA 8081 beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Surrogate: TCMX 100.58 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 111.22 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 18 of 41 D1-0.5 J254478-019(Soil) EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010 EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512018 11/26/25 EPA 8081 beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Surrogate: TCMX 103.86 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 116.07 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 19 of 41 D2-0.5 J254478-020(Soil) EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010 EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512018 11/26/25 EPA 8081 beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Surrogate: TCMX 112.18 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 123.67 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 20 of 41 D3-0.5 J254478-021(Soil) EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010 EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512018 11/26/25 EPA 8081 beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Surrogate: TCMX 96.62 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 110.65 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 21 of 41 E1-0.5 J254478-025(Soil) EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010 EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512018 11/26/25 EPA 8081 beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Surrogate: TCMX 106.52 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 118.54 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 22 of 41 E2-0.5 J254478-026(Soil) EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010 EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512018 11/26/25 EPA 8081 beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Surrogate: TCMX 104.91 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 115.32 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 23 of 41 E3-0.5 J254478-027(Soil) EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010 EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512018 11/26/25 EPA 8081 beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Surrogate: TCMX 106.51 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 120.78 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 24 of 41 F1-0.5 J254478-031(Soil) EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010 EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512054 12/01/25 EPA 8081 beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Surrogate: TCMX 90.98 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 78.09 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 25 of 41 F2-0.5 J254478-032(Soil) EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010 EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512054 12/01/25 EPA 8081 beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Surrogate: TCMX 80.14 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 69.61 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 26 of 41 F3-0.5 J254478-033(Soil) EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg 1 QC2512038 12/01/25 EPA 6010 EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg 1 QC2512054 12/01/25 EPA 8081 beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg " " " " Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg " " " " Surrogate: TCMX 85.18 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 76.97 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 Analyte Result Reporting Limit Units Dilution Batch Analyzed Method Notes 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 27 of 41 Analyte EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 - Quality Control Reporting Spike Source %REC %REC Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limits Notes Batch QC2511466 - EPA 6010 CCV 1 Arsenic, As 1.0 5.0 % 1 99 90 - 110 110 Arsenic, As LCSD 1 Arsenic, As 174 5.0 % 174 5.0 % 200 87 80 - 120 200 87 80 - 120 0.17 120 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 LCS 1 Method Blank 1 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 28 of 41 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 29 of 41 Analyte EPA 6010B Arsenic by ICP-OES by EPA 6010 - Quality Control Reporting Spike Source %REC %REC Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limits Notes Batch QC2512038 - EPA 6010 CCV 1 Arsenic, As 1.0 5.0 % 1 100 90 - 110 110 Arsenic, As LCSD 1 Arsenic, As 171 5.0 % 172 5.0 % 200 85 80 - 120 200 86 80 - 120 0.60 120 Arsenic, As ND 5.0 mg/kg Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 LCS 1 Method Blank 1 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 30 of 41 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 31 of 41 Analyte EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 - Quality Control Reporting Spike Source %REC %REC Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limits Notes Batch QC2512017 - EPA 8081 CCV 1 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 alpha-BHC 113 10.0 % 100 113 80 - 120 120 Heptachlor 117 10.0 % 100 117 80 - 120 120 Aldrin 117 10.0 % 100 117 80 - 120 120 Heptachlor epoxide 114 10.0 % 100 114 80 - 120 120 gamma-Chlordane 110 10.0 % 100 110 80 - 120 120 Endosulfan I 114 10.0 % 100 114 80 - 120 120 4,4'-DDE 107 10.0 % 100 107 80 - 120 120 Dieldrin 112 10.0 % 100 112 80 - 120 120 Endrin 105 10.0 % 100 105 80 - 120 120 4,4'-DDD 111 10.0 % 100 111 80 - 120 120 Endosulfan II 105 10.0 % 100 105 80 - 120 120 4,4'-DDT 111 10.0 % 100 111 80 - 120 120 Endrin ketone 111 10.0 % 100 111 80 - 120 120 LCS 1 alpha-BHC 102 10.0 % 100 102 60 - 140 Heptachlor 119 10.0 % 100 119 60 - 140 Aldrin 108 10.0 % 100 108 60 - 140 Heptachlor epoxide 108 10.0 % 100 108 60 - 140 gamma-Chlordane 101 10.0 % 100 101 60 - 140 Endosulfan I 108 10.0 % 100 108 60 - 140 4,4'-DDE 101 10.0 % 100 101 60 - 140 Dieldrin 104 10.0 % 100 104 60 - 140 Endrin 97.2 10.0 % 100 97 60 - 140 4,4'-DDD 104 10.0 % 100 104 60 - 140 Endosulfan II 106 10.0 % 100 106 60 - 140 4,4'-DDT 108 10.0 % 100 108 60 - 140 Endrin ketone 105 10.0 % 100 105 60 - 140 Surrogate: TCMX 112.19 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 119.51 % 30 - 135 LCSD 1 alpha-BHC 105 10.0 % 100 105 60 - 140 3.23 140 Heptachlor 121 10.0 % 100 121 60 - 140 1.64 140 Aldrin 111 10.0 % 100 111 60 - 140 3.60 140 Heptachlor epoxide 111 10.0 % 100 111 60 - 140 3.46 140 gamma-Chlordane 104 10.0 % 100 104 60 - 140 2.46 140 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 32 of 41 Analyte EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 - Quality Control Reporting Spike Source %REC %REC Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limits Notes Batch QC2512017 - EPA 8081 Endosulfan I 109 10.0 % 100 109 60 - 140 0.60 140 4,4'-DDE 104 10.0 % 100 104 60 - 140 3.48 140 Dieldrin 107 10.0 % 100 107 60 - 140 2.88 140 Endrin 103 10.0 % 100 103 60 - 140 5.57 140 4,4'-DDD 105 10.0 % 100 105 60 - 140 0.48 140 Endosulfan II 109 10.0 % 100 109 60 - 140 3.43 140 4,4'-DDT 109 10.0 % 100 109 60 - 140 1.48 140 Endrin ketone 109 10.0 % 100 109 60 - 140 3.94 140 Surrogate: TCMX 115.36 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 123.20 % 30 - 135 Method Blank 1 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg Surrogate: TCMX 106.41 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 113.95 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 LCSD 1 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 33 of 41 Analyte EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 - Quality Control Reporting Spike Source %REC %REC Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limits Notes Batch QC2512018 - EPA 8081 CCV 1 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 alpha-BHC 112 10.0 % 100 112 80 - 120 120 Heptachlor 111 10.0 % 100 111 80 - 120 120 Aldrin 117 10.0 % 100 117 80 - 120 120 Heptachlor epoxide 115 10.0 % 100 115 80 - 120 120 gamma-Chlordane 112 10.0 % 100 112 80 - 120 120 Endosulfan I 112 10.0 % 100 112 80 - 120 120 4,4'-DDE 109 10.0 % 100 109 80 - 120 120 Dieldrin 113 10.0 % 100 113 80 - 120 120 Endrin 105 10.0 % 100 105 80 - 120 120 4,4'-DDD 113 10.0 % 100 113 80 - 120 120 Endosulfan II 104 10.0 % 100 104 80 - 120 120 4,4'-DDT 111 10.0 % 100 111 80 - 120 120 Endrin ketone 112 10.0 % 100 112 80 - 120 120 LCS 1 alpha-BHC 92.1 10.0 % 100 92 60 - 140 Heptachlor 108 10.0 % 100 108 60 - 140 Aldrin 92.7 10.0 % 100 93 60 - 140 Heptachlor epoxide 97.4 10.0 % 100 97 60 - 140 gamma-Chlordane 91.6 10.0 % 100 92 60 - 140 Endosulfan I 97.9 10.0 % 100 98 60 - 140 4,4'-DDE 91.0 10.0 % 100 91 60 - 140 Dieldrin 94.1 10.0 % 100 94 60 - 140 Endrin 105 10.0 % 100 105 60 - 140 4,4'-DDD 93.8 10.0 % 100 94 60 - 140 Endosulfan II 95.0 10.0 % 100 95 60 - 140 4,4'-DDT 95.2 10.0 % 100 95 60 - 140 Endrin ketone 94.7 10.0 % 100 95 60 - 140 Surrogate: TCMX 108.60 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 115.66 % 30 - 135 LCSD 1 alpha-BHC 90.4 10.0 % 100 90 60 - 140 1.86 140 Heptachlor 107 10.0 % 100 107 60 - 140 0.85 140 Aldrin 91.4 10.0 % 100 91 60 - 140 1.40 140 Heptachlor epoxide 97.0 10.0 % 100 97 60 - 140 0.36 140 gamma-Chlordane 90.3 10.0 % 100 90 60 - 140 1.47 140 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 34 of 41 Analyte EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 - Quality Control Reporting Spike Source %REC %REC Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limits Notes Batch QC2512018 - EPA 8081 Endosulfan I 97.5 10.0 % 100 97 60 - 140 0.44 140 4,4'-DDE 89.3 10.0 % 100 89 60 - 140 1.90 140 Dieldrin 93.0 10.0 % 100 93 60 - 140 1.14 140 Endrin 103 10.0 % 100 103 60 - 140 2.22 140 4,4'-DDD 93.1 10.0 % 100 93 60 - 140 0.77 140 Endosulfan II 95.6 10.0 % 100 96 60 - 140 0.60 140 4,4'-DDT 94.9 10.0 % 100 95 60 - 140 0.31 140 Endrin ketone 95.6 10.0 % 100 96 60 - 140 0.88 140 Surrogate: TCMX 99.20 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 108.09 % 30 - 135 Method Blank 1 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg Surrogate: TCMX 97.08 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 103.08 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 LCSD 1 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 35 of 41 Analyte EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 - Quality Control Reporting Spike Source %REC %REC Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limits Notes Batch QC2512054 - EPA 8081 CCV 1 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 alpha-BHC 97.5 10.0 % 100 97 80 - 120 120 Heptachlor 104 10.0 % 100 104 80 - 120 120 Aldrin 101 10.0 % 100 101 80 - 120 120 Heptachlor epoxide 101 10.0 % 100 101 80 - 120 120 gamma-Chlordane 99.6 10.0 % 100 100 80 - 120 120 Endosulfan I 102 10.0 % 100 102 80 - 120 120 4,4'-DDE 99.0 10.0 % 100 99 80 - 120 120 Dieldrin 99.4 10.0 % 100 99 80 - 120 120 Endrin 98.3 10.0 % 100 98 80 - 120 120 4,4'-DDD 97.5 10.0 % 100 97 80 - 120 120 Endosulfan II 96.6 10.0 % 100 97 80 - 120 120 4,4'-DDT 96.2 10.0 % 100 96 80 - 120 120 Endrin ketone 97.8 10.0 % 100 98 80 - 120 120 LCS 1 alpha-BHC 80.3 10.0 % 100 80 60 - 140 Heptachlor 88.3 10.0 % 100 88 60 - 140 Aldrin 85.0 10.0 % 100 85 60 - 140 Heptachlor epoxide 86.8 10.0 % 100 87 60 - 140 gamma-Chlordane 83.0 10.0 % 100 83 60 - 140 Endosulfan I 89.1 10.0 % 100 89 60 - 140 4,4'-DDE 83.2 10.0 % 100 83 60 - 140 Dieldrin 83.4 10.0 % 100 83 60 - 140 Endrin 76.6 10.0 % 100 77 60 - 140 4,4'-DDD 81.5 10.0 % 100 81 60 - 140 Endosulfan II 84.2 10.0 % 100 84 60 - 140 4,4'-DDT 79.4 10.0 % 100 79 60 - 140 Endrin ketone 87.2 10.0 % 100 87 60 - 140 Surrogate: TCMX 96.62 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 95.05 % 30 - 135 LCSD 1 alpha-BHC 75.1 10.0 % 100 75 60 - 140 6.75 140 Heptachlor 83.8 10.0 % 100 84 60 - 140 5.27 140 Aldrin 73.1 10.0 % 100 73 60 - 140 15.07 140 Heptachlor epoxide 82.4 10.0 % 100 82 60 - 140 5.22 140 gamma-Chlordane 78.2 10.0 % 100 78 60 - 140 5.88 140 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 36 of 41 Analyte EPA 8081A Organochlorinated Pesticides (OCPs) by GC-ECD by EPA 8081 - Quality Control Reporting Spike Source %REC %REC Result Limit Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limits Notes Batch QC2512054 - EPA 8081 Endosulfan I 84.4 10.0 % 100 84 60 - 140 5.41 140 4,4'-DDE 77.6 10.0 % 100 78 60 - 140 6.98 140 Dieldrin 79.2 10.0 % 100 79 60 - 140 5.18 140 Endrin 75.4 10.0 % 100 75 60 - 140 1.57 140 4,4'-DDD 80.3 10.0 % 100 80 60 - 140 1.52 140 Endosulfan II 83.0 10.0 % 100 83 60 - 140 1.45 140 4,4'-DDT 77.9 10.0 % 100 78 60 - 140 1.83 140 Endrin ketone 84.0 10.0 % 100 84 60 - 140 3.80 140 Surrogate: TCMX 86.46 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 90.57 % 30 - 135 Method Blank 1 alpha-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg beta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg gamma-BHC (Lindane) ND 10.0 µg/kg Heptachlor ND 10.0 µg/kg delta-BHC ND 10.0 µg/kg Aldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg Heptachlor epoxide ND 10.0 µg/kg gamma-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg alpha-Chlordane ND 10.0 µg/kg Endosulfan I ND 10.0 µg/kg 4,4'-DDE ND 10.0 µg/kg Dieldrin ND 10.0 µg/kg Endrin ND 10.0 µg/kg 4,4'-DDD ND 10.0 µg/kg Endosulfan II ND 10.0 µg/kg 4,4'-DDT ND 10.0 µg/kg Endrin aldehyde ND 10.0 µg/kg Endosulfan sulfate ND 10.0 µg/kg Methoxychlor ND 20.0 µg/kg Endrin ketone ND 10.0 µg/kg Toxaphene ND 20.0 µg/kg Surrogate: TCMX 96.47 % 30 - 135 Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 96.14 % 30 - 135 Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 LCSD 1 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 37 of 41 Notes and Definitions ND Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit RPD Relative Percent Difference E Estimated Concentration; concentration exceeds calibration range. LCC Leak Check Compound MDL Compound Reported to Method Detection Limit 1 Recovery outside of acceptable limits. LCS/LCSD recoveries and %RSD were within QC limits, therefore data was accepted. SMSR Sample matrix prevented adequate surrogate recovery. J Value less then PQL but greater than MDL. HHSR High hydrocarbon concentration in this sample prevented adequate surrogate recovery. SMTAR Sample matrix prevented adequate recovery of target analytes. OV Sample was filtered in the lab before extraction. HHTAR High hydrocarbon concentration prevented in-range recovery of target analytes. IHRPD Target analyte recoveries were outside of range but accepted due to passing RPDs AROL Target analyte recovery exceeded recovery range but was accepted due to ND of that analyte in MB and sample(s). ISO-H Isomers could not be sufficiently chromatographically resolved according to method requirements due to hydrocarbon interference or other matrix effects. The isomers' reported individual concentrations were each calculated as the average of each of the individual isomers' concentrations. 2 Recovery outside of acceptable limits for either LCS or LCSD. CCV and LCS or LCSD recoveries were within limits; therefore data was accepted. 3 RPD outside of acceptable limits. Target analyte recoveries were within QC limits; therefore, data was accepted. 4 LCS and/or LCSD recoveries exceeded acceptability ranges. Target analyte recoveries were accepted due to passing CCV, in-range LCS/LCSD RPDs, and a clean MB in which all target analytes were < RL. 5 MS and/or MSD recoveries exceeded acceptability ranges. Target analyte recoveries were accepted due to passing CCV, in-range LCS/LCSD RPDs, and a clean MB in which all target analytes were < RL. SMTAR Sample matrix prevented adequate recovery of target analytes. RV Surrogate recovery outside of control limits due to required dilution. ASP Hydrocarbons in this sample most closely resemble asphalt. @ Surrogate is outside acceptable limits. All other QC parameters in control, therefore data was accepted. S Sample was subjected to elemental sulfur cleanup by EPA 3660B. TIC Tentatively Identified Compound. Compound is not in the calibration mix and does not have a valid calibration. All reported detections are estimated. Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 11007 FOREST PLACE SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 714-449-9937 PHONE 562-646-1611 FAX Colby Wakeman Lab Director 38 of 41 TH1 This sample was analyzed outside the recommended EPA holding time. YP Associated CCV outside of control limits low. IB CCV recovery above limit; analyte not detected LO MS and/or MSD result unavailable. Batch accept. based on LCS rec. YQ Associated CCV outside of control limits high. GN Surrogate recovery is outside of control limits LG Surrogate recovery below the acceptance limits. LH Surrogate recovery above the acceptance limits. AZ Surr. recovery outside of acceptance limits due to matrix interf. HN Low concentration matrix spike recovery out of limits HO High concentration matrix spike recovery out of limits M A matrix effect is present. LR LCS recovery below method control limits. TW LCS recovery exceeds control limit. Jones Environmental, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Stantec Consulting 735 EastCarnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project: Project Number: Project Manager: Chacon Farms 185807160 Jim DeWoody Reported 12/02/25 15:01 j'.2511-76 Pagel of '3 . ct ·- . , Stantec CHAIN OF CUSTODY Laboratory Project Number: Client Name/Address: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 735 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Project Manager: Jim Dewoody E-Mail Address: james.dewoody@stantec.com '\ Analysis Required Turn Around Time: Normal X 72 Hour: 48 Hour 909-335-6116 Laboratory: Sa_Ampler'NNag:l 24 Hour Same Day: Jones Environmental 10260 Matern Place Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 714-449-9937 Stantec Project Number: 185807160 Project Name: Chacon Farms QJ a. E V"l ' "O c"t' ID' u"' 0. 0 ' .... C Other: ample Temp ·c:•'{ T-"\ Sample Description/Identification Sample Matrix Preservative # of Sample Date Sample Time .... 00 QJ 0 .... (see below) Cont. != 0 u._ \0 0 0 00 ::c Special Instructions A t-o. 4 // I ( Ill,. .... f.::- a }( ,<. - ()(.f\. A-2- 11? A 3 ·OL ' 7 3 n,W ,'.... , -OC l1.... -oo .A I - A.2- /2f/'J l?T'f J'.._ )( _o _,-4(; A - Bl -,:J. /'J1r;'n cx;1, X ,< -OC ID -o( 1 'R?-A . .z;- B'3-IJ. ;o, l - R2- /'J,e;'S /) 7l('-/ /:J4'I t!)}!a:) >'---- >'- )( ?'-- )< X. -t:JO g _ DO l\. -\. 0 -"' r:?- /' -b,,;- n74.(p /l } :>< ,1<.. ..x -,u - -D\ ; ' ' Time - cz-o,, ' I OSI02 7-" ,,,<..-"\ C3 -t!!),s ' /J7'; X -o, Sample Preservative: l=ICE - 2=HCI - 3=H2S04 - 4=HN03 - 5=NaOH - 6=0ther: Special Instructions: Contact PM for additional follow-on analysis. Prelims to PM when available. /?..J" -...../2. / I Relinquished B /.....-r / ./ _,/, / / Date Time Received By+ Company Name: _/ Time Mitchell/ --:;.-...,.- ...r/ Relin isneo t,>f ,flyName: / /2 .Ar '..PIJ,- '"a... /- -,z ;... II J/z 1/4_-«-/3<!2- Date' Time ;:::z:..:- °:J;;/4/ l'1 \1 Re,rn:;;;;cyN !t:fJ 1112,,1 I t-f.: t1 fiyirnquished By+ Con}lll!ny Namv Date Time Receivedy+ Company Name: V Date T3im4eof 41 Stantec Laboratory Project Number: j254:1·J6 CHAIN OF CUSTODY Page 2. of":, . -o. f.:""'7 -" ro Client Name/Address: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 735 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 280 San Bernardino, CA 92408 909-335-6116 Laboratory: Jones Environmental 10260 Matern Place Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Project Manager: Jim Dewoody E-Mail Address: james.dewoody@stantec.com SarJ/;?L Stantec Project Number: 185807160 I\. Analysis Required QJ C. Turn Around Time: Normal X 72 Hour: 48 Hour 24 Hour Same Day: Other: )ample Temp •c:lo. 714-449-9937 Project Name: Chacon Farms E Vl c"t' "O CD u"' Q. 0 c't 0 "iA Sample Description/Identification ( - Sample Matrix ,,: ( Preservative (see below) { # of Cont. I Sample Date . K/Zb/t.€, Sample Time ,, Cj</ S< QJ ±= u::: 0.... 0 \ti .... 00 0 00 ... 0 :I: ;( -o l\o Special Instructions C 2-.- o><-oL( ,,t -o \1 /- n1 - 0, 5 .P2.- < 'iV - c;- n, - D?--:; 1) - c _,,,,, s- l.1")'7"3-$ ?)'{2-{ 05::J.C. ffT tJlfiZ.. 2.ss- IL'7",7 'o/'U 1')2-. ,?<- )',.... "'7-- ;( >< ..J.... x :I-- --L_ ;,( X. \ _;;,\(.\ -v l;l.b .[ 11..\ -v IJ.2,, D )./, v!J'.\ -0 12.-S- _o b-\o ,::- rt -- 0, > lJ 72.C; '14'2.'i' ){- r-- A. -v l..1 -0 J. t:"2..- \ \ \ l 11 '1 < -v bA Stantec Laboratory Project Number: j254:1·J6 CHAIN OF CUSTODY Page 2. of":, -- / Time 'j Date Time Received By+ Company Name: °;ik1I Time -'? ' ' '1'2-8" ✓ -v 11.0 Sample Preservative: l=ICE - 2=HCI - 3=H2SO4 - 4=HNO3 - 5=NaOH - 6=Other: Special Instructions: Contact PM for additional follow-on analysis. Prelims to PM when available. Mitchell 8 _/ /_/_.,,. .,, /7 I/ /4_.//-z_.1;> /L_ ;,'//'L -/'I/ _?7- Reli t# Di//2; IY'. Date ( l eivrvit.?!ftne: \f,V\{;_J Time Jl fl IJ.,I I1/5,-- 1icll Relinquished By+ C ny Nam1/ Date Time Received By +ympany Name: Date T3im5e of 41 Relinquished Bv: ,,.,,. Stantec Laboratory Project Number: CHAIN OF CUSTODY j'.254478 Page·of3 cc ID Client Name/Address: Project Manager: '\ Analysis Required Turn Around Time: Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 714-449-9937 Sample Description/Identification Sample Matrix Project Name: Chacon Farms Preservative # of Sample Date Sample Time Q) E ro Vl -0 .Q..). Q) .!=. Ill ' 0... uIll Q. 0 ... .C.... t,ample Temp °C: - 1""...'l r.1--o., pz,,.. o. F ,_.-,..,_",; ,'/ (see below) Cont. -I 11,':,:._/·-:; ?}19 7 ?7 1)7 ( u::: 0 r- J<- 'y 0 00 A "/(:'. 0 ::c -() \ --0 -o[; Special Instructions Fl -:.; \ X -· 3'{ r::.2....-- ' \J I\J /lx.:;7- r- ...,v - F3r'3 A,•/ I I 11/24/'9' ' /172.3 )< -n .3\o Sample Preservative: 1-ICE - 2=HCI - 3-H2S04 - 4-HN03 - 5-NaOH - 6-Other: Special Instructions: Contact PM for additional follow-on analysis. Prelims to PM when available. 00 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Jim Dewoody Normal X 735 E. Carnegie Drive, Suite 280 E-Mail Address: 72 Hour: San Bernardino, CA 92408 james.dewoody@stantec.com 48 Hour 909-33S-6116 Sampler Name: 24 Hour Laboratory: Same Day: Jones Environmental Stantec Project Number: Other: 10260 Matern Place 185807160 a. Stantec Laboratory Project Number: CHAIN OF CUSTODY j'.254478 Page·of3 Rec - - - / Relinquished s✓ .// /4 A Mitchel ---- X - ///9 r¾/21h: Time /01-. Received + <:'mpaN1yam . '/"#Y'-.-:.... licne Da;;/4f 1..3 "2- Relin6ef,'ecfBy -t'co1iim anyme: [2a'f€' <Time ftt:,1 :ffU7 .,_ , Date' Time 7/Jo'N/5 R6nquished By+ CoptSany Name(/ Date ' Time Received B C mpany Name: Date T3im6eof 41 ;C... / ,/:/?-/ :m? e: 1Jl2AJ Jl,Cl1 37 of 41 Customer Name: Stantec Consulting Purchase Order: Project ID: Chacon Farms Comment: Login Report Order ID: J254478 Order Date: 11/21/2025 Sample #: J254478-001 Customer Sample #: A1-0.5 Site: Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 9:06 AM Quantity: Comment: 1 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 11/21/25 4:19 PM Test Test Group Method Due Date Priority Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025 OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025 Sample #: J254478-002 Customer Sample #: A2-0.5 Site: Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 7:53 AM Quantity: Comment: Test 1 Matrix: Soil Test Group Date Received: Method 11/21/25 Due Date 4:19 PM Priority Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025 OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025 Customer Name: Stantec Consulting Purchase Order: Project ID: Chacon Farms Comment: Order ID: Order Date: J254478 11/21/2025 38 of 41 Sample #: J254478-003 Customer Sample #: A3-0.5 Site: Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 7:49 AM Quantity: Comment: 1 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 11/21/25 4:19 PM Test Test Group Method Due Date Priority Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025 OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025 Sample #: J254478-007 Customer Sample #: B1-0.5 Site: Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 12:00 AM Quantity: Comment: Test 1 Matrix: Soil Test Group Date Received: Method 11/21/25 Due Date 4:19 PM Priority Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025 OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025 Sample #: J254478-008 Customer Sample #: B2-0.5 Site: Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 7:58 AM Quantity: Comment: Test 1 Matrix: Soil Test Group Date Received: Method 11/21/25 Due Date 4:19 PM Priority Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025 OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025 Sample #: J254478-009 Customer Sample #: B3-0.5 Site: Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 7:44 AM Quantity: Comment: Test 1 Matrix: Soil Test Group Date Received: Method 11/21/25 Due Date 4:19 PM Priority Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025 OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025 Sample #: J254478-013 Customer Sample #: C1-0.5 Site: Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 9:16 AM Quantity: Comment: Test 1 Matrix: Soil Test Group Date Received: Method 11/21/25 Due Date 4:19 PM Priority Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025 Customer Name: Stantec Consulting Purchase Order: Project ID: Chacon Farms Comment: Order ID: Order Date: J254478 11/21/2025 39 of 41 OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025 Sample #: J254478-014 Customer Sample #: C2-0.5 Site: Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 8:02 AM Quantity: Comment: 1 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 11/21/25 4:19 PM Test Test Group Method Due Date Priority Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025 OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025 Sample #: J254478-015 Customer Sample #: C3-0.5 Site: Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 7:36 AM Quantity: Comment: Test 1 Matrix: Soil Test Group Date Received: Method 11/21/25 Due Date 4:19 PM Priority Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025 OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025 Sample #: J254478-019 Customer Sample #: D1-0.5 Site: Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 9:21 AM Quantity: Comment: Test 1 Matrix: Soil Test Group Date Received: Method 11/21/25 Due Date 4:19 PM Priority Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025 OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025 Sample #: J254478-020 Customer Sample #: D2-0.5 Site: Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 8:26 AM Quantity: Comment: Test 1 Matrix: Soil Test Group Date Received: Method 11/21/25 Due Date 4:19 PM Priority Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025 OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025 Customer Name: Stantec Consulting Purchase Order: Project ID: Chacon Farms Comment: Order ID: Order Date: J254478 11/21/2025 40 of 41 Sample #: J254478-021 Customer Sample #: D3-0.5 Site: Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 7:30 AM Quantity: Comment: 1 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 11/21/25 4:19 PM Test Test Group Method Due Date Priority Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025 OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025 Sample #: J254478-025 Customer Sample #: E1-0.5 Site: Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 9:26 AM Quantity: Comment: Test 1 Matrix: Soil Test Group Date Received: Method 11/21/25 Due Date 4:19 PM Priority Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025 OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025 Sample #: J254478-026 Customer Sample #: E2-0.5 Site: Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 8:32 AM Quantity: Comment: Test 1 Matrix: Soil Test Group Date Received: Method 11/21/25 Due Date 4:19 PM Priority Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025 OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025 Sample #: J254478-027 Customer Sample #: E3-0.5 Site: Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 7:20 AM Quantity: Comment: Test 1 Matrix: Soil Test Group Date Received: Method 11/21/25 Due Date 4:19 PM Priority Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025 OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025 Sample #: J254478-031 Customer Sample #: F1-0.5 Site: Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 9:32 AM Quantity: Comment: Test 1 Matrix: Soil Test Group Date Received: Method 11/21/25 Due Date 4:19 PM Priority Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025 Customer Name: Stantec Consulting Purchase Order: Project ID: Chacon Farms Comment: Order ID: Order Date: J254478 11/21/2025 41 of 41 OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025 Sample #: J254478-032 Customer Sample #: F2-0.5 Site: Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 8:37 AM Quantity: Comment: 1 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 11/21/25 4:19 PM Test Test Group Method Due Date Priority Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025 OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025 Sample #: J254478-033 Customer Sample #: F3-0.5 Site: Recv'd: Collector: Date Collected: 11/20/25 7:21 AM Quantity: Comment: Test 1 Matrix: Soil Test Group Date Received: Method 11/21/25 Due Date 4:19 PM Priority Arsenic, As EPA 6010 12/3/2025 OCPs EPA 8081 12/3/2025 SAMPLE CONDITION RECORD 1.Are the samples within correct temperature criteria? (0 - 6°C)No 2.If not within temp. criteria, were samples received on ice?Yes 3.If not within temp. criteria, were samples received on same day of sampling?No 4.Is the Chain of Custody (COC) received filled out completely?Yes 5.Does the total number of containers received match COC?Yes 6.Are the sample container label(s) consistent with COC?Yes 7.Are the sample container(s) intact and in good condition?Yes 8.Were the proper containers & sufficient volume for analyses requested on COC?Yes 9.Was the proper preservative indicated on COC/container for analyses requested?Yes 10.Are the containers for volatile analysis free of headspace? (EPA 8260 water)N/A EDF Requested No Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 99 LETTER D Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 100 Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 101 Responses To Letter D Supporters Alliance For Environmental Responsibility (SAFER) – Lozeau Drury LLP, March 24, 2026 Comment D-1: The commenter identifies the project and states that the comment is submitted on behalf of Supporters Alliance For Environmental Responsibility (SAFER) regarding the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Chacon Farms Project. Response D-1: The City acknowledges the comment. The letter was received on March 24, 2026, after the close of the 30-day public review period for the Draft IS/MND, which extended from October 28, 2025 through November 27, 2025. Although CEQA does not require a written response to comments on a Mitigated Negative Declaration, and does not require consideration of late comments, the City has elected to respond as a matter of good public policy and transparency. Comment D-2: The commenter asserts that the IS/MND is improper under CEQA due to its alleged failure to adequately assess the Project's potentially significant environmental impacts, requests preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR) on the basis that a fair argument exists that the Project may have adverse environmental impacts, and reserves the right to supplement the comment throughout the administrative process. Response D-2: Under CEQA, an EIR is required only where substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080(d); CEQA Guidelines, § 15064(f)(1).) Substantial evidence consists of facts, reasonable assumptions predicated on facts, and expert opinion supported by facts; it does not include argument, speculation, or unsubstantiated opinion. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080(e); CEQA Guidelines, § 15384.) The comment letter identifies no specific impact, technical deficiency, or evidence in support of its request for an EIR, and therefore does not provide substantial evidence supporting a fair argument under CEQA. The Draft IS/MND analyzed each environmental issue area required by Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, supported by Project-specific technical studies and, as discussed in the responses to Letters A and B, by a supplemental Phase II Environmental Site Assessment and a California LESA Model analysis included as appendices to this Final IS/MND. The commenter's reservation of rights is noted; any supplemental comments timely submitted will be made part of the administrative record. Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 102 Finding: The comments do not identify a new significant environmental impact, a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified impact, or the need for new or considerably different mitigation measures. Accordingly, recirculation under CEQA Guidelines section 15073.5 is not required, and preparation of an EIR is not warranted. This section intentionally left blank Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 103 Public Comment: April 7, 2026 Letter of comment for San Jacinto City Council Members regarding the new housing development Chacon Farms Project in San Jacinto, CA. We have some concerns about the safety of the roads near the Chacon Farms Project, namely Cawston Ave North between Esplane and 7th, and 7th Street between Cawston and Sanderson. The concerns we have are for the safety of both pedestrians and vehicles alike. In our San Jacinto Valley, homes typically have several cars each, so adding 419 homes becomes thousands of cars. Based on the 11th Edition ITEManual Analysis, the Chacon Farms Project is projected to generate roughly 3,952 daily vehicle trips. Having reduced the number of entrance/exits in the project from 3 down to 2 will greatly increase the impact on both Cawston Ave N and 7th Street. Our property is located along Cawston and 7th streets, so we will share the roads with this new development. We have yet to be made aware of what - if any - actual improvements to these streets will be. At the planning commission meeting on March 24, 2026, there were no specific/complete plans available for road improvements. Currently, Cawston Ave N is a narrow street with a temporary sidewalk on the West side and no turning lanes or shoulders for either lane, making it difficult and sometimes dangerous for vehicles to turn into and out of the driveways. This is a "bottleneck" of sorts, as Cawston Ave North of 7th and South of Esplanade is improved with sidewalks, turning lanes and shoulders, appropriate for the homes and schools in the area. 7th Street between Sanderson and Cawston is currently improved on the Westbound lane with sidewalks and turning lanes into housing projects. However, the Eastbound lane is narrow and has no turn lanes or shoulders, which makes it difficult and dangerous for vehicles to turn into and out of the driveways. Talley Meadows Layups and Retirement, our busy working horse ranch for the past 10 years, has several gated entrances along Cawston and 7th streets. While we understand the need for development in our community, we feel it is imperative to widen and improve Cawston Ave between Esplanade and 7th, and 7th street between Cawston and Sanderson for the safety and wellbeing of school children, families and those traveling in vehicles. E-2 E-3 E-1 E-4 E-5 LETTER E Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 104 Responses To Letter E Joe and Christy Talley – Talley Meadows Layups and Retirement, April 7, 2026 Comment E-1: The commenters express concern about pedestrian and vehicular safety on Cawston Avenue North between Esplanade and 7th Street, and on 7th Street between Cawston and Sanderson, in connection with the addition of 419 homes and the Project's projected generation of approximately 3,952 daily vehicle trips (11th Edition ITE Manual Analysis). The commenters note that the reduction of project entrance/exits from three to two will concentrate traffic impact on Cawston Avenue North and 7th Street. Response E-1: The City acknowledges the commenters' safety concerns and the Project's projected trip generation. The Transportation Impact Analysis prepared for the Project (appended to the Draft IS/MND) evaluates the Project's projected trip generation, the operational performance of study intersections and roadway segments under existing, opening-year, and cumulative conditions, and the adequacy of Project access. The analysis confirms that, with implementation of the required off-site improvements identified in the Conditions of Approval, all study intersections and roadway segments will operate at acceptable levels of service consistent with City standards, and the consolidation of Project access points does not create a new or substantially more severe traffic safety hazard than the conditions analyzed in the Draft IS/MND. The Draft IS/MND analysis of transportation impacts (Section 4.17) is supported by substantial evidence. Comment E-2: The commenters state that they have not been made aware of what, if any, actual improvements to Cawston Avenue and 7th Street will be required, and that at the Planning Commission meeting on March 24, 2026, there were no specific or complete plans available for road improvements. Response E-2: The City respectfully clarifies the nature of the entitlement-stage record. The Tentative Tract Map No. 39076 reviewed by the Planning Commission on March 24, 2026 included street cross- sections and frontage exhibits for Cawston Avenue, 7th Street, and Esplanade Avenue. The Draft IS/MND described the required off-site frontage improvements in narrative form, and the Transportation Impact Analysis appended to the Draft IS/MND analyzed the trip generation, intersection operations, and roadway conditions associated with the Project. Together, these constitute the level of project definition required for CEQA review and for the entitlement decisions before the Planning Commission. Construction-level improvement plans (signing and striping plans, structural sections, joint details, and similar) are submitted to and approved by the City Engineer at a later stage of the development process — specifically, prior to recordation of the Final Map (Conditions of Approval Nos. 13 and 24) — and are not required at the entitlement stage. Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 105 Importantly, the Conditions of Approval adopted by the Planning Commission establish the off- site frontage improvements as binding requirements of Project approval, as set forth in Response E-3 below. Comment E-3: The commenters state that Cawston Avenue North is currently a narrow street with a temporary sidewalk on the west side and no turning lanes or shoulders, making it difficult and sometimes dangerous for vehicles to turn into and out of driveways. The commenters describe this as a "bottleneck," given that Cawston Avenue north of 7th Street and south of Esplanade is improved with sidewalks, turning lanes, and shoulders. Response E-3: The City acknowledges the existing condition of Cawston Avenue along the Project's easterly frontage. The Conditions of Approval adopted by the Planning Commission on March 24, 2026 require the developer to construct the following frontage improvements along Cawston Avenue prior to issuance of the Phase 1 Certificate of Occupancy — i.e., before any resident may occupy a home in the Project: •Dedication of an additional 20 feet of right-of-way to provide a 50-foot wide halfwidth right-of-way consistent with the City's Major roadway classification (Condition of Approval No. 9); •Asphalt paving (Traffic Index 9.0, PG 70-10); • 8-inch curb and gutter located 32 feet west of centerline; •A Class II Buffered Bike Lane consistent with the City of San Jacinto Trails Master Plan; •An 18-foot wide parkway with landscaping; •A 6-foot wide concrete sidewalk; and •Streetlights subject to photometric analysis per City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, and Caltrans standards (Condition of Approval No. 86). These improvements will widen and improve Cawston Avenue along the Project's frontage to the City's Major roadway standard, replacing the existing narrow cross-section with a permanent improved sidewalk, dedicated bike facility, landscaped parkway, curb and gutter, and a wider travel section that accommodates the addition of a Project-side travel lane. The improvements directly address the bottleneck condition identified by the commenters and bring the Cawston Avenue frontage into conformance with the improved sections of Cawston Avenue north of 7th Street and south of Esplanade Avenue. In addition, Condition of Approval No. 115 requires installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Cawston Avenue and Cottonwood Avenue, and Conditions Nos. 79 and 108 require payment of the City's Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees and the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), which fund area-wide circulation improvements. Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 106 Comment E-4: The commenters state that 7th Street between Cawston and Sanderson is currently improved on the westbound lane with sidewalks and turning lanes, but that the eastbound lane is narrow and has no turn lanes or shoulders, making it difficult and dangerous for vehicles to turn into and out of driveways. Response E-4: The City acknowledges the existing condition of 7th Street along the Project's northerly frontage. The Conditions of Approval adopted by the Planning Commission require the developer to construct the following frontage improvements along 7th Street prior to issuance of the Phase 1 Certificate of Occupancy: •Dedication of an additional 20 feet of right-of-way to provide a 50-foot wide halfwidth right-of-way consistent with the City's Major roadway classification (Condition of Approval No. 8); •Asphalt paving (Traffic Index 9.0, PG 70-10); • 8-inch curb and gutter located 32 feet south of centerline; •A Class II Buffered Bike Lane consistent with the City of San Jacinto Trails Master Plan; •An 18-foot wide parkway with landscaping; •A 6-foot wide concrete sidewalk; and •Streetlights subject to photometric analysis per City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, and Caltrans standards (Condition of Approval No. 85). These improvements will widen and improve the eastbound (south) side of 7th Street along the Project's frontage to the City's Major roadway standard, addressing the asymmetry between the existing improved westbound side and the unimproved eastbound side that the commenters identify. The Project's frontage along 7th Street extends from the northwest corner of the property at Cawston Avenue westward; improvements to segments of 7th Street beyond the Project's frontage are the responsibility of the City and adjoining property owners through future Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects and frontage improvements associated with future development, and are funded in part through the Project's required TUMF and Traffic Signal Mitigation Fee contributions. Comment E-5: The commenters identify Talley Meadows Layups and Retirement as a working horse ranch with several gated entrances along Cawston and 7th Streets, and state that while they understand the need for development, they feel it is imperative to widen and improve Cawston Avenue between Esplanade and 7th Street, and 7th Street between Cawston and Sanderson, for the safety and well-being of school children, families, and other travelers. Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 107 Response E-5: The City appreciates the commenters' acknowledgement of the community's growth needs and their long-standing presence as the operators of Talley Meadows Layups and Retirement. As detailed in Responses E-3 and E-4, the widening and improvement of Cawston Avenue between Esplanade and 7th Street along the Project's frontage, and of 7th Street along the Project's northerly frontage, are required as binding Conditions of Approval and must be completed before any resident occupies a home in the Project. In addition, the design and approval of the off-site frontage improvements through the City Engineer's review of the construction-level Street Improvement Plans (Conditions Nos. 13 and 24) will ensure that the improvements meet the City's adopted standards for pedestrian safety, vehicular operation, and access to the commenters' existing gated driveways. Finding: The comments raise community concerns regarding traffic and pedestrian safety along Cawston Avenue and 7th Street that are addressed through the Project's required off-site frontage improvements (Conditions of Approval Nos. 8, 9, 85, 86, 115) and through the Project's payment of City Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees and TUMF (Conditions Nos. 79, 108). The comments do not identify any new significant environmental impact, do not demonstrate that previously identified impacts would be substantially more severe than disclosed in the Draft IS/MND, and do not require the addition of new or considerably different mitigation measures. Accordingly, recirculation under CEQA Guidelines section 15073.5 is not required. This section intentionally left blank Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 108 April 7, 2026 To the City Council Members of San Jacinto, CA, Public Comment Regarding Traffic Safety Concerns for the Chacon Farms Project We, Michael and Emalee Tomoni, owners of Talley Meadows Layups and Retirement, wish to formally express our significant concerns regarding pedestrian and vehicle safety near the proposed Chacon Farms Project. Our property is located at the intersection of Cawston Avenue and 7th Street, and we will directly share these roads with the new development. Based on the project's projected generation of approximately 3,952 daily vehicle trips (11th Edition ITE Manual Analysis), we anticipate a substantial increase in traffic volume. We have specific safety concerns regarding the current state of local infrastructure: Reduced Access: The reduction of project entrance/exits from three to two will concentrate traffic impact on Cawston Avenue North and 7th Street. Cawston Avenue North (between Esplanade and 7th): This section is currently narrow with a temporary sidewalk on the west side and lacks turning lanes or shoulders. This creates a "bottleneck" and dangerous turning conditions, unlike the improved sections north of 7th and south of Esplanade. 7th Street {between Cawston and Sanderson): The eastbound lane is narrow, with no turn lanes or shoulders, making turns into and out of driveways difficult and unsafe. Proposed Solution We feel it is imperative that the City mandates the widening and improvement of Cawston Avenue (between Esplanade and 7th) and 7th Street (between Cawston and Sanderson) before the project's completion. These improvements are vital for the safety and well-being of local school children, families, and all travelers in the area. We appreciate your thoughtful consideration of these critical safety concerns. April 7, 2026 To the City Council Members of San Jacinto, CA, Public Comment Regarding Traffic Safety Concerns for the Chacon Farms Project We, Michael and Emalee Tomoni, owners of Talley Meadows Layups and Retirement, wish to formally express our significant concerns regarding pedestrian and vehicle safety near the proposed Chacon Farms Project. Our property is located at the intersection of Cawston Avenue and 7th Street, and we will directly share these roads with the new development. Based on the project's projected generation of approximately 3,952 daily vehicle trips (11th Edition ITE Manual Analysis), we anticipate a substantial increase in traffic volume. We have specific safety concerns regarding the current state of local infrastructure: , Reduced Access: The reduction of project entrance/exits from three to two will concentrate traffic impact on Cawston Avenue North and 7th Street. , Cawston Avenue North (between Esplanade and 7th): This section is currently narrow with a temporary sidewalk on the west side and lacks turning lanes or shoulders. This creates a "bottleneck" and dangerous turning conditions, unlike the improved sections north of 7th and south of Esplanade. , 7th Street {between Cawston and Sanderson): The eastbound lane is narrow, with no turn lanes or shoulders, making turns into and out of driveways difficult and unsafe. Proposed Solution We feel it is imperative that the City mandates the widening and improvement of Cawston Avenue (between Esplanade and 7th) and 7th Street (between Cawston and Sanderson) before the project's completion. These improvements are vital for the safety and well-being of local school children, families, and all travelers in the area. We appreciate your thoughtful consideration of these critical safety concerns. Sincerely,�� �j- Michael and Emalee Tomoni F-2 F-3 F-4 F-1 LETTER F Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 109 Responses To Letter F Michael and Emalee Tomoni – Owners, Talley Meadows Layups and Retirement, April 7, 2026 Comment F-1: The commenters identify themselves as the owners of Talley Meadows Layups and Retirement, located at the intersection of Cawston Avenue and 7th Street, and express significant concerns regarding pedestrian and vehicular safety near the proposed Chacon Farms Project. The commenters reference the Project's projected generation of approximately 3,952 daily vehicle trips (11th Edition ITE Manual Analysis) and anticipate a substantial increase in traffic volume. Response F-1: The City acknowledges the commenters' safety concerns and the Project's projected trip generation. The Transportation Impact Analysis prepared for the Project (appended to the Draft IS/MND) evaluates the Project's projected trip generation, the operational performance of study intersections and roadway segments, and the adequacy of Project access. With implementation of the required off-site frontage improvements identified in the Conditions of Approval and described in Response F-3 below, all study intersections and roadway segments will operate at acceptable levels of service consistent with City standards. See also Response E- 1, which addresses the same trip generation and operational analysis in greater detail. Comment F-2: The commenters identify a concern under the heading "Reduced Access": that the reduction of project entrance/exits from three to two will concentrate traffic impact on Cawston Avenue North and 7th Street. Response F-2: The Project's access configuration was analyzed in the Transportation Impact Analysis and was reflected in the Tentative Tract Map No. 39076 reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on March 24, 2026. The consolidation of Project access points was evaluated for its effect on adjacent intersection operations and roadway segment performance, and the analysis concludes that with the required off-site frontage improvements, the access configuration provides safe and adequate ingress and egress consistent with City standards. The Project's two access points are supported by the widening and improvement of Cawston Avenue and 7th Street along the Project's frontage to the City's Major roadway standard (see Response F-3) and by the installation of a traffic signal at Cawston Avenue and Cottonwood Avenue (Condition of Approval No. 115). Comment F-3: The commenters identify a concern under the heading "Cawston Avenue North (between Esplanade and 7th)": that this section is currently narrow with a temporary sidewalk on the west side and lacks turning lanes or shoulders, creating a "bottleneck" and dangerous turning Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 110 conditions, unlike the improved sections north of 7th Street and south of Esplanade Avenue. Response F-3: The Project's easterly frontage along Cawston Avenue corresponds to the segment between 7th Street and Esplanade Avenue identified by the commenters. The Conditions of Approval adopted by the Planning Commission require the developer to construct the following frontage improvements along Cawston Avenue prior to issuance of the Phase 1 Certificate of Occupancy: •Dedication of an additional 20 feet of right-of-way to provide a 50-foot wide halfwidth right-of-way (Condition of Approval No. 9); •Asphalt paving (Traffic Index 9.0, PG 70-10); • 8-inch curb and gutter located 32 feet west of centerline; •A Class II Buffered Bike Lane consistent with the City of San Jacinto Trails Master Plan; •An 18-foot wide parkway with landscaping; •A 6-foot wide concrete sidewalk; and •Streetlights (Condition of Approval No. 86). These improvements will widen and improve the Project's Cawston Avenue frontage to the City's Major roadway standard, replacing the existing temporary sidewalk and unimproved cross- section, and bringing this segment into conformance with the improved sections of Cawston Avenue north of 7th Street and south of Esplanade Avenue. The bottleneck condition identified by the commenters is directly addressed by these required improvements. See also Response E- 3. Comment F-4: The commenters identify a concern under the heading "7th Street (between Cawston and Sanderson)": that the eastbound lane is narrow, with no turn lanes or shoulders, making turns into and out of driveways difficult and unsafe. Under the heading "Proposed Solution," the commenters state that it is imperative the City mandates the widening and improvement of Cawston Avenue between Esplanade and 7th Street, and 7th Street between Cawston and Sanderson, before the Project's completion. Response F-4: The Project's northerly frontage along 7th Street corresponds to the western portion of the segment between Cawston and Sanderson identified by the commenters. The Conditions of Approval require the developer to construct the following frontage improvements along 7th Street prior to issuance of the Phase 1 Certificate of Occupancy: •Dedication of an additional 20 feet of right-of-way to provide a 50-foot wide halfwidth right-of-way (Condition of Approval No. 8); •Asphalt paving (Traffic Index 9.0, PG 70-10); Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration – Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076– PROJ23-0029 2.0 Comment Letters and Responses Page 111 •8-inch curb and gutter located 32 feet south of centerline; •A Class II Buffered Bike Lane consistent with the City of San Jacinto Trails Master Plan; •An 18-foot wide parkway with landscaping; •A 6-foot wide concrete sidewalk; and •Streetlights (Condition of Approval No. 85). These improvements will widen and improve the eastbound (south) side of 7th Street along the Project's frontage, addressing the asymmetry between the existing improved westbound side and the unimproved eastbound side identified by the commenters. Improvements to segments of 7th Street beyond the Project's frontage are the responsibility of the City and adjoining property owners through future Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects and frontage improvements associated with future development; the Project contributes to area-wide circulation improvements through payment of the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) and the City's Traffic Signal Mitigation Fee (Conditions of Approval Nos. 79 and 108). With respect to the commenters' proposed solution, the widening and improvement of the Project's Cawston Avenue and 7th Street frontages must be completed prior to issuance of the Phase 1 Certificate of Occupancy — that is, before any resident may occupy a home in the Project — which directly satisfies the timing the commenters request. See also Response E-4 and Response E-5. Finding: The comments raise concerns regarding traffic and pedestrian safety along Cawston Avenue and 7th Street that are addressed through the Project's required off-site frontage improvements (Conditions of Approval Nos. 8, 9, 85, 86, 115) and through the Project's payment of City Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees and TUMF (Conditions Nos. 79, 108). The comments do not identify any new significant environmental impact, do not demonstrate that previously identified impacts would be substantially more severe than disclosed in the Draft IS/MND, and do not require the addition of new or considerably different mitigation measures. Accordingly, recirculation under CEQA Guidelines section 15073.5 is not required. This section intentionally left blank SEVENTH STREET ESPLANADE AVENUE CAWSTON AVENUESEE SHEET 3SEE SHEET 4SEE SHEET 2ESPLANADE SPECIFIC PLANSP 01-02 CITY OF SAN JACINTOSEALDIG ALERTW.O.FORBENCHMARK:SCALEDATEDATECITYAPPR.CHECKED BY:BYMARKENGINEERREVISIONSDRAWN BY:DATEDESIGNED BY: SHEET NO.FILE NO.1DATEPREPARED BY:R.C.E. NO.OF 5 SHEETSPark City, UT 84098, 5133 Cove Canyon Dr, #302 Hemet, CA. 92544, 41555 E Florida Ave., Suite G, Phone (951)658-1727 Fax (951)658-9347CIVIL ENGINEERINGBWABLAINE A. WOMERBoise, ID, 83706, 4355 W Emerald Street, St. 145, Phone (208)593-75551" = 60'SEPT. 18, 2024 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 39076RAMONA DAIRYAPPROVED BY:CONTRACT CITY ENGINEERDATETENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 39076IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTOPORTION SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, S.B.M.VICINITY MAPN.T.S.ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO(S).OWNERFLOOD PLAINSCHOOL DISTRICTSOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHYACREAGENUMBER OF LOTSUTILITIESPROPOSED ZONINGEXISTING ZONINGPROPOSED LAND USEADJACENT LAND USEEXISTING LAND USEAPPLICANTSHEET INDEXLEGAL DESCRIPTIONEASEMENT NOTESLINE DATASEVENTH STREET - MAJORTYPICAL STREET SECTIONT.I. = 9.0CAWSTON AVENUE - MAJORTYPICAL STREET SECTIONT.I. = 9.0ESPLANADE AVENUE - ARTERIALTYPICAL STREET SECTIONT.I. = 9.5ROADS - MODIFIED LOCALTYPICAL STREET SECTIONT.I. = 5.5ENTRANCE ROADS - STREET 'A'/MODIFIED LOCALTYPICAL STREET SECTIONT.I. = 5.5PRIVATE STREETSPRIVATE STREETSZONINGTYPICAL BUILDING SETBACKSEARTHWORK CALCULATIONSDENSITYOPEN SPACE AREA (NO BASINS)ENTRANCE ROADS - STREET 'K'/MODIFIED LOCALTYPICAL STREET SECTIONT.I. = 5.5PRIVATE STREETSPHASING NOTEPRIVATE STREET LEGENDPUBLIC STREETPUBLIC STREETPUBLIC STREET SEVENTH STREETCAWSTON AVENUE LAND USE - VERY LOW DENSITY RES. ZONE - RURAL RESIDENTIAL ESPLANADE SPECIFIC PLAN SP 01-02APN 432-260-017 LAND USE - LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIALZONE - RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY35P.E.= 7.934P.E.= 8.133P.E.= 8.432P.E.= 8.731P.E.= 9.030P.E.= 9.329P.E.= 9.628P.E.= 9.927P.E.= 10.226P.E.= 10.536P.E.= 7.6TRACTS 32955 & 32955-5 CITY OF SAN JACINTOSEALDIG ALERTW.O.FORBENCHMARK:SCALEDATEDATECITYAPPR.CHECKED BY:BYMARKENGINEERREVISIONSDRAWN BY:DATEDESIGNED BY: SHEET NO.FILE NO.2DATEPREPARED BY:R.C.E. NO.OF 5 SHEETSPark City, UT 84098, 5133 Cove Canyon Dr, #302 Hemet, CA. 92544, 41555 E Florida Ave., Suite G, Phone (951)658-1727 Fax (951)658-9347CIVIL ENGINEERINGBWABLAINE A. WOMERBoise, ID, 83706, 4355 W Emerald Street, St. 145, Phone (208)593-75551" = 60'SEPT. 18, 2024 TENTATIVE TRACTMAP NO. 39076RAMONA DAIRYAPPROVED BY:CONTRACT CITY ENGINEERDATESEE SHEET NO. 31"=60'060120180 CAWSTON AVENUE LAND USE: VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONE: RURAL RESIDENTIAL TRACT 32955-1APN 432-260-014 ESPLANADE SPECIFIC PLAN SP 01-02APN 432-260-017 25P.E.= 10.824P.E.= 11.123P.E.= 11.422P.E.= 11.821P.E.= 12.120P.E.= 12.3ESPLANADE SPECIFIC PLAN SP 01-02 35P.E.= 10.634P.E.= 10.733P.E.= 11.030P.E.= 11.129P.E.= 10.828P.E.= 10.432P.E.= 11.431P.E.= 11.4TRACTS 32955 & 32955-5 CITY OF SAN JACINTOSEALDIG ALERTW.O.FORBENCHMARK:SCALEDATEDATECITYAPPR.CHECKED BY:BYMARKENGINEERREVISIONSDRAWN BY:DATEDESIGNED BY: SHEET NO.FILE NO.3DATEPREPARED BY:R.C.E. NO.OF 5 SHEETSPark City, UT 84098, 5133 Cove Canyon Dr, #302 Hemet, CA. 92544, 41555 E Florida Ave., Suite G, Phone (951)658-1727 Fax (951)658-9347CIVIL ENGINEERINGBWABLAINE A. WOMERBoise, ID, 83706, 4355 W Emerald Street, St. 145, Phone (208)593-75551" = 60'SEPT. 18, 2024 TENTATIVE TRACTMAP NO. 39076RAMONA DAIRYAPPROVED BY:CONTRACT CITY ENGINEERDATESEE SHEET NO. 2SEE SHEET NO. 41"=60'060120180 ESPLANADE AVENUECAWSTON AVENUE TRACT 32955-1APN 432-260-014 LAND USE: VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONE: RURAL RESIDENTIAL ESPLANADE SPECIFIC PLAN SP 01-0215P.E.= 13.616P.E.= 13.517P.E.= 13.118P.E.= 12.919P.E.= 12.520P.E.= 12.321P.E.= 11.922P.E.= 11.723P.E.= 11.324P.E.= 11.125P.E.= 10.726P.E.= 10.527P.E.= 10.3 CITY OF SAN JACINTOSEALDIG ALERTW.O.FORBENCHMARK:SCALEDATEDATECITYAPPR.CHECKED BY:BYMARKENGINEERREVISIONSDRAWN BY:DATEDESIGNED BY: SHEET NO.FILE NO.4DATEPREPARED BY:R.C.E. NO.OF 5 SHEETSPark City, UT 84098, 5133 Cove Canyon Dr, #302 Hemet, CA. 92544, 41555 E Florida Ave., Suite G, Phone (951)658-1727 Fax (951)658-9347CIVIL ENGINEERINGBWABLAINE A. WOMERBoise, ID, 83706, 4355 W Emerald Street, St. 145, Phone (208)593-75551" = 60'SEPT. 18, 2024 TENTATIVE TRACTMAP NO. 39076RAMONA DAIRYAPPROVED BY:CONTRACT CITY ENGINEERDATESEE SHEET NO. 31"=60'060120180 CITY OF SAN JACINTOSEALDIG ALERTW.O.FORBENCHMARK:SCALEDATEDATECITYAPPR.CHECKED BY:BYMARKENGINEERREVISIONSDRAWN BY:DATEDESIGNED BY: SHEET NO.FILE NO.5DATEPREPARED BY:R.C.E. NO.OF 5 SHEETSPark City, UT 84098, 5133 Cove Canyon Dr, #302 Hemet, CA. 92544, 41555 E Florida Ave., Suite G, Phone (951)658-1727 Fax (951)658-9347CIVIL ENGINEERINGBWABLAINE A. WOMERBoise, ID, 83706, 4355 W Emerald Street, St. 145, Phone (208)593-75551" = 60'DECEMBER, 2021 TENTATIVE TRACTMAP NO. 39076LOT AREASJAB MILL CREEK, LLCAPPROVED BY:CONTRACT CITY ENGINEERDATELOT AREA TABLELOT #AREA SQFT.15,41225,50435,50445,50455,50465,50475,50485,50495,476105,033115,217127,362135,113145,058155,258165,263175,263185,263195,263205,263215,263225,263235,263245,263255,276265,088275,088285,088295,088305,088314,927325,055334,995344,995354,995364,995374,995384,995394,903405,088415,088425,088435,088445,088455,088465,088475,088485,088495,088505,085LOT AREA TABLELOT #AREA SQFT.515,019527,950537,486544,971555,058565,075575,075585,075595,075605,075615,075625,075635,075643,938653,938663,938673,938683,938693,938703,923713,977725,032736,682744,398754,099764,156774,163784,163794,163804,163814,163824,163834,163844,163854,163864,163874,163884,163894,163904,163914,163924,163934,163944,163954,163964,163974,163984,163994,1631004,163LOT AREA TABLELOT #AREA SQFT.1014,1631024,1631034,1631044,1631054,16310641631074,1631084,1631094,1631104,1631114,1631124,1631134,1631144,1631154,1851164,1401174,1471184,0911194,6431204,5451214,6371225,1201235,1191245,1191255,1191265,1191275,1191285,1201294,8111304,6961315,1731325,1731335,1731345,1731355,1731365,1731375,1731384,6381394,5451404,6431414,7801424,3281434,3271444,3291454,1431464,1631474,5441484,7801494,1631504,163LOT AREA TABLELOT #AREA SQFT.1515,2731525,3041535,3041545,3041555,3041565,3041575,3041584,8241594,8471605,3241615,3241625,3241635,3241645,1431654,9771665,5421675,8751687,0991695,0191705,7411714,8831725,0731735,0881745,0881755,0881765,0881774,6081785,0291795,5061805,5061815,5061825,5061835,5061845,5061855,0371864,3611874,1631884,3431894,3431904,3431914,1631924,1631934,1631944,1631954,4011964,2411974,1631984,1631994,1462003,773LOT AREA TABLELOT #AREA SQFT.2013,7172025,1682035,1292044,8242054,3782064,6392074,0552083,9012094,5022104,5892114,5872124,7092134,8022144,6382154,6382164,8762174,8762184,8752194,8752204,7002214,7392224,6362234,6352244,6362254,6372264,6372274,6382284,6352294,7522304,9562314,6332324,6332334,6342344,5862354,6352364,6362374,6362384,6362394,6362404,7392414,8422424,8422434,8422444,7392454,6362464,8842474,8022484,6452494,6452504,883LOT AREA TABLELOT #AREA SQFT.2514,8832525,0922534,8832544,9792554,6452564,6452574,6452584,9462594,8432604,6452614,6452624,8432634,8832645,0892654,8832664,8832674,8832684,6452694,6452704,8022715,5382726,2692736,2682746,2692756,2692765,4322775,1812786,0192796,0192806,0192816,0192826,0192835,0802845,2852856,0192866,0192876,0192886,0192896,0192905,1812915,4322926,2692936,2692946,2692956,2692965,3292975,4492986,1792996,1793006,179LOT AREA TABLELOT #AREA SQFT.3016,1793025,3433035,2573046,0943056,0943066,0943076,0943086,0943095,1553105,3603116,0943126,0943136,0943146,0943156,0943165,2573175,3433186,1793196,1793206,1793216,1793225,2403234,2413244,1633254,3483264,3483274,2663284,3273294,3793304,2553314,1633324,3033334,7583345,5923355,5343365,5343375,5343385,5343395,5343404,9003415,0633425,5343435,5343445,5343455,5333465,0893475,8743486,0683495,0283504,944LOT AREA TABLELOT #AREA SQFT.3515,2943525,5273535,5273545,5273555,0573565,2213575,5273585,5273595,5273605,5273615,5273625,5683634,4893644,4893654,4893664,4893674,2123684,2913694,1813704,3483714,3483724,3483734,8773744,2203754,1703764,1833774,6513784,4733794,4503804,6153814,6153824,4303834,3193844,2753854,1633864,4093874,4713884,4713894,4713904,1953914,2403924,7063935,1843945,1843955,1843965,1843975,1843985,1843995,1844005,187LOT AREA TABLELOT #AREA SQFT.4014,8274024,8924035,1874045,1844055,1844065,1844075,1844085,1844095,1844105,1844114,7064124,3334134,1634144,2144154,3734164,3734174,3734184,3724194,235LOT 'A'168,611LOT 'B'48,417LOT 'C'22,214LOT 'D'26,755 General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 1 of 59 Approval Date: July 7, 2026 Effective Date: July 21, 2026 Expiration Date: July 7, 2029 PROJECT LOCATION: West site of Cawston Avenue extending between Seventh Street and Esplanade Avenue San Jacinto, CA APN: 432-260-009, 432-260-026, 432-260-027 APPLICANT: Ramona Dairy, LLC Richard Micheal 2451 Ramona Expressway San Jacinto, CA 92582 ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO BY: Applicant (signature) Date PROJECT DESCRIPTION A General Plan Amendment from Very Low Density Residential to Low Density Residential; a Change of Zone from Rural Residential to Residential Low Density; approval of a Planned Development Permit and Tentative Tract Map 39076 to subdivide three parcels into 419 single-family residential lots on approximately 73.97 gross acres, including on-site roadways, parks, a detention basin, and landscaping. General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 2 of 59 General Requirements & Information A. To the extent permitted by law the applicant/licensee shall by accepting these conditions agree to defend (with legal counsel of City’s selection), indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its elected and appointed officials, agents, attorneys, employees and officers, from any action, claim or proceeding brought by any party other than the applicant/licensee against the City or its elected and appointed officials, agents, employees and officers to attack, set aside, void, or annul a discretionary land use approval of the City, which action is brought within the applicable statute of limitations. The required indemnification shall include damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorneys’ fees and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with the action. The City shall promptly notify the applicant/licensee of any such claim, action, or proceeding and cooperate fully in the defense. B. The residential subdivision shall comply with all required development standards of the Development Code and the Planned Development Permit (PDP). When a conflict between the Development Code and the PDP exists, the PDP standards will supersede the Development Code C. An SB 330 Preliminary Application was submitted for this development and became effective on March 31, 2025 (the “Vesting Date”), which is the date the applicant submitted a complete application pursuant to Government Code Section 65941.1. The City will utilize the development standards and fees in effect on March 31, 2025. D. The residential subdivision shall comply with the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Section 66410 et seq.) and Title 16 (Subdivisions) of the Municipal Code. E. The effective date of Tentative Tract Map 39076 is ten (10) days following the approval date. The approval will lapse if a final map has not recorded within three (3) years from the date upon which the approval was granted. Unless a time extension is approved by the City’s applicable review authority, applications for time extensions must be received prior to the expiration date. The filing of a final map for phase 1 of the Tentative Tract Map shall extend the life of the remaining portion of the Tentative Tract Map consistent with Government Code section 66452.6. The Tentative Tract Map may be recorded in phases in a manner consistent with the phasing map. General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 3 of 59 F. The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall pay any outstanding planning application or processing fees within ten (10) days of City’s request therefore and prior to permits being exercised. Failure to do so will be grounds for Code Enforcement actions, revocation, or further legal action. G. The Project shall fully and continually comply with all applicable conditions of approval, State, Federal, and local laws in effect at the time the permit is approved and exercised, and which may become effective and applicable thereafter. Failure to do so will be grounds for Code Enforcement actions, revocation, or further legal action. H. This permit shall run with the land associated to the project/permit and continues to be valid upon change of ownership. All applicable conditions of approval shall continue to apply with a change in property ownership. I. All plans submitted to the City shall be in substantial conformance with the plans in this approval as conditioned. This condition applies to site plans, grading plans, landscape plans, building plans, elevations, and all other illustrations, text, or plans submitted to the City in connection with the Project. J. The approved entitlement cannot be legally conducted on the subject property until all applicable conditions of approval have been met to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. K. The applicant shall be subject to all applicable development fees. Such fees may include, but not be limited to Development Impact Fees, Park Fees, School Fees, Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees, and Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fees. L. Signs shall be permitted in accordance with Chapter 17.335 – Sign Regulations of the Development Code in effect on the Vesting Date. Any signs, including exterior-mounted, monument, and window signs, shall be subject to separate review and assessment. A separate sign application, including fees and additional sets of plans, will be necessary prior to sign permit issuance. M. The City shall have the right to inspect the site and facilities to ensure compliance with the conditions of approval and to recover its actual costs related to such inspections from the property owner or tenant. General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 4 of 59 N. Site Plan and Design Review (SPDR) for construction of the dwelling units shall ensure that all lumber scraps, combustible materials, and other debris be picked up daily, or more often as required by the Building and Safety Division. O. All existing and new utilities adjacent to and on the Project site shall be located underground as per City of San Jacinto Municipal Code Section 15.32. P. In the event of a conflict between any conditions for this approval, the most restrictive regulations shall apply. Q. The contractor shall comply with the following best practices during the construction phase of the development. o The erection (including excavation), demolition, alteration or repair of any building shall occur between the hours of seven a.m. and seven p.m. on weekdays and Saturdays, and between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays, except when such work complies with the terms of a temporary use permit which may be issued by the community development director or his or her designee, upon a showing of sufficient need due to hot or inclement weather, or the use of an unusually long process material, or other circumstances of unusual and compelling nature. o During the entire active construction period, equipment and trucks used for the project construction shall utilize the best available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds), wherever feasible. o During the entire active construction period, stationary noise sources shall be located as far from sensitive receptors as possible, and they shall be incorporated to the extent feasible. o Select haul routes that avoid the greatest amount of sensitive use areas. Avoid soil hauling through residential areas. o Signs shall be posted at the job site entrance(s), within the on-site construction zones, and along queueing lanes (if any) to reinforce the prohibition of unnecessary engine idling. All other equipment shall be turned off if not in use for more than 5 minutes. General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 5 of 59 o Equipment shall be maintained and operated such that loads are secured from rattling or banging. R. A copy of all pages of these Conditions shall be included in the construction drawing packages for grading plans and building permits, including landscaping permits. S. During the entire active construction period and to the extent feasible, the use of noise -producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. The construction manager shall use smart back-up alarms, which automatically adjust the alarm level based on the background noise level, or switch off back-up alarms and replace them with human spotters in compliance with all safety requirements and laws. T. A grading permit shall be obtained from the City of San Jacinto prior to the commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained Road right-of-way. U. The Project is required to comply with San Jacinto Development Code Section 17.300.080 which requires all exterior lighting to be shielded or modified and located so as to eliminate spillover illumination or glare beyond the property line or upward into the sky. General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 6 of 59 Engineering Department General Requirements & Information V. With respect to the Conditions of Approval for the above referenced project, the City of San Jacinto requires that the developer/property owner provides the following street improvements and/or road dedications in accordance with the City of San Jacinto Municipal Code. It is understood that the site plan correctly shows all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, rights-of-way, and drainage courses with appropriate Q’s and their omission may require the site plan to be resubmitted for further consideration. These ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complimentary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvements. Unless otherwise noted, all offsite improvements as conditioned shall be installed prior to issuance of any occupancy permits. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the City Engineer’s office. In the event of a conflict between any conditions stated below, those imposed by Planning Department and others, and requirements identified in the approved Traffic impact Analysis, the most stringent in the opinion of the City shall prevail. W. The project grading shall be in a manner to perpetuate existing natural patterns. Any deviation from this, concentration or increase in runoff must have approval of adjacent property owners and City Engineer. The developer/property owner shall accept the offsite runoff and convey to acceptable outlet. X. Prior to commencement of any construction or installation of fencing in public right-of-way, an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer’s office. Y. The developer/property owner shall secure City’s and appropriate agencies’ clearances and approvals of the improvement plans. General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 7 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Recordation of the Final Map (Phase 1) Met? Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 1 Planning 1) The Final Map shall accurately depict the Typical Rear Yard sections within the PDP. ☐ Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 1 Planning 2) The developer/applicant shall prepare CC&R’s for City review and approval. The CC&R’s shall include a provision for maintenance of the common spaces within the subdivision and shall include a provision allowing the increase of fees to ensure continued maintenance of all common and public areas in the event any assessment district is reduced or eliminated. A Homeowners Association (HOA) shall be established to enforce the CC&Rs, and to provide ongoing maintenance of the parking areas, park, basins and landscaped areas. ☐ Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 1 Engineering 3) A final map shall be filed for review and approval and shall be recorded. ☐ Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 1 Engineering 4) The developer/property owner shall have approved improvement plans, executed subdivision improvement agreement, and posted securities for the public improvements. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 8 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Recordation of the Final Map (Phase 1) Met? Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 1 Engineering 5) A total of 52 feet (52’) shall be dedicated for all interior streets within Phase 1 and will be privately maintained. ☐ Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 1 Engineering 6) A total of 56 feet (56’) shall be dedicated for Street “A”, a privately maintained street. ☐ Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 1 Engineering 7) A total of 80 feet (80’) shall be dedicated for the Street “K” entry, a privately maintained street. ☐ Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 1 Engineering 8) Seventh Street is classified as a Major per the City General Plan. A 30 - foot wide halfwidth right-of-way is currently dedicated along the property’s northerly frontage. The developer/property owner shall dedicate the required additional 20 feet (20’) of right-of-way to provide for a 50-foot wide halfwidth right-of-way. ☐ Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 1 Engineering 9) Cawston Avenue is classified as a Major per the City General Plan. A 30- foot wide halfwidth right-of-way is currently dedicated along the property’s easterly frontage. The developer/property owner shall dedicate the required additional 20 feet (20’) of right-of-way to provide for a 50-foot wide halfwidth right-of-way. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 9 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Recordation of the Final Map (Phase 1) Met? Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 1 Engineering 10) Property line corner cutbacks shall be dedicated per County of Riverside Standard No. 805. ☐ Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 1 Engineering 11) All easements and/or public street rights-of-way shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agencies in perpetuity and shall continue in force until the City or the appropriate agency accepts or abandons such offers. ☐ Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 1 Engineering 12) The developer/property owner shall sign the consent and waiver form to join the City’s Flood Control District as appropriate. The proposed streetlights and traffic signals shall be maintained by the City and cost paid by the developer/property owner through the said annexation. ☐ Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 1 Engineering 13) The developer/property owner shall submit the following to the City Engineer for review and approval: • Street Improvement Plans • Street Light Plans prepared by a registered Electrical Engineer • Signing and Striping, Traffic Signal Plans as appropriate • Onsite Grading and Erosion Control Plans – Plans shall show the approved WDID No. • Geotechnical Report (for reference) • Sewer and Water Plans • Storm Drain Improvement Plans • Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis • Final WQMP (for reference) including WDID No. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 10 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Recordation of the Final Map (Phase 1) Met? • Traffic Signal Plan The design shall comply with Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), Fire Department, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCD), Riverside County Transportation Department, Caltrans, City of San Jacinto and ADA most recent standards, criteria, and requirements and in effect at the time of construction and shall be coordinated with the approved plans of the adjacent developments. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 1 Engineering 14) The following statement shall be added to the Final Map: NOTICE OF DRAINAGE FEES – Notice is hereby given that this property is located in San Jacinto Valley Area Drainage Plan which was adopted by the City of San Jacinto pursuant to Ordinance 13-01 and Section 66001, et seq, of the Government Code and that said property is subject to fees for said drainage area. Notice is further given that, pursuant to Ordinance 13-01, payment of the drainage fees shall be paid to the City of San Jacinto prior to issuance of the building permit for a parcel, and that the property owner shall pay the fee required at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. ☐ Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 1 Special Districts 15) Establish a funding mechanism for the maintenance of public improvements. • One such mechanism is annexation into the Public Facilities Maintenance Community Facilities District (CFD) is an option to fulfill the funding requirement for maintenance of public improvements. If a property owner opts to annex into a CFD, the annexation must be finalized in order to satisfy this condition. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 11 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Recordation of the Final Map (Phase 1) Met? Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 1 Special Districts 16) Establish a funding mechanism for the public safety services. • One such mechanism is annexation into the Public Safety Community Facilities Districts (CFD) is an option to fulfill the funding requirement for public safety services. Funding of services under the City’s CFDs will consist of an annual assessment based on the costs of such services, as determined by a City’s Engineer’s Estimate and established by tax zone. ☐ Timing Responsible Department Prior to Recordation of the Final Map (Phase 2) Met? Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 2 Engineering 17) A final map for phase 2 shall be filed for review and approval and shall be recorded. ☐ Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 2 Engineering 18) The developer/property owner shall have approved improvement plans, executed subdivision improvement agreement, and posted securities for the public improvements. ☐ Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 2 Engineering 19) A total of 52 feet (52’) shall be dedicated for all interior streets withing phase 2. Interior Streets will be privately maintained. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 12 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Recordation of the Final Map (Phase 2) Met? Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 2 Engineering 20) Esplanade Avenue is classified as an Arterial per the City General Plan. A 56-foot wide halfwidth right-of-way is currently dedicated along the property’s southerly frontage. The developer/property owner shall dedicate the required additional 17 feet (17’) of right-of-way to provide for a 73-foot wide halfwidth right-of-way with Phase 2. ☐ Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 2 Engineering 21) Property line corner cutbacks shall be dedicated per County of Riverside Standard No. 805. ☐ Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 2 Engineering 22) All easements and/or street rights-of-way shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agencies in perpetuity and shall continue in force until the City or the appropriate agency accepts or abandons such offers. ☐ Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 2 Engineering 23) The developer/property owner shall sign the consent and waiver form to join the City’s Lighting and Landscape Districts and City’s Flood Control District as appropriate. The proposed streetlights and traffic signals shall be maintained by the City and cost paid by the developer/property owner through the said annexation. ☐ Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 2 Engineering 24) The developer/property owner shall submit the following to the City Engineer for review and approval: • Street Improvement Plans • Street Light Plans prepared by a registered Electrical Engineer • Signing and Striping, Traffic Signal Plans as appropriate • Onsite Grading and Erosion Control Plans – Plans shall show the ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 13 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Recordation of the Final Map (Phase 2) Met? approved WDID No. • Geotechnical Report (for reference) • Storm Drain Improvement Plans • Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis • Final WQMP (for reference) including WDID No. • Traffic Signal Plan The design shall comply with Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), Fire Department, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCD), Riverside County Transportation Department, Caltrans, City of San Jacinto and ADA most recent standards, criteria, and requirements and in effect at the time of construction and shall be coordinated with the approved plans of the adjacent developments. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Phase 2 Engineering 25) The following statement shall be added to the Final Map: NOTICE OF DRAINAGE FEES – Notice is hereby given that this property is located in San Jacinto Valley Area Drainage Plan which was adopted by the City of San Jacinto pursuant to Ordinance 13 -01 and Section 66001, et seq, of the Government Code and that said property is subject to fees for said drainage area. Notice is further given that, pursuant to Ordinance 13-01, payment of the drainage fees shall be paid to the City of San Jacinto prior to issuance of the building permit for a parcel, and that the property owner shall pay the fee required at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 14 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to a Specific Date Met? 30-days Prior to Grading Planning 26) Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Burrowing Owl Pre-Construction Surveys. The Project Applicant shall retain a qualified Biologist to conduct a pre - construction survey for burrowing owl on the Proposed Project Site (and including adjacent areas within 500 feet to the extent possible) within 30 days prior to construction. Methods for the pre-construction surveys shall be conducted as a one-day focused survey following the Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP 2006). Following the survey, the Biologist shall prepare a Memorandum/Letter Report describing the methods and results of the survey for submittal to the City. If burrowing owl are observed, the Report shall also make recommendations for avoidance and minimization measures depending on the timing of construction and the location of the active burrow with respect to planned activities. If burrowing owl are observed, the Project Applicant (or their designee) shall contact the City to discuss avoidance and minimization options. During the breeding season (i.e., March 1 to August 31), restrictions shall be placed on construction activities in the vicinity of any active burrow until the burrow is no longer active, as determined by a qualified Biologist. The protective buffer shall be 500 feet (or as otherwise approved by the City) around the active burrow. The protective buffer shall be flagged clearly in the field, mapped as an “Environmentally Sensitive Area,” and the maps provided to the Project Applicant, their designee (e.g., Construction Supervisor), and the City. During the wintering season, an active burrow may be closed following CDFW-approved procedures with permission from the City. If the wintering burrow would not be directly impacted, a protective buffer of 160 feet (or as otherwise approved by the City) shall be placed around the burrow. The protective buffer shall be flagged clearly in the field, mapped as an “Environmentally Sensitive Area,” and the maps ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 15 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to a Specific Date Met? provided to the Project Applicant, their designee (e.g., Construction Supervisor), and the City. The Project Applicant shall not proceed with construction until the avoidance and minimization measures have been approved by the City and all appropriate protections are in place. Three days prior to Grading Planning 27) Mitigation Measure BIO-2: Nesting Bird Survey. To the extent possible, vegetation removal will be conducted during the non-breeding season (September 12 to January 31) in order to minimize direct impacts on nesting birds and raptors. If construction activities would be initiated during the peak breeding season for nesting birds/raptors (February 1–June 30), a pre-construction survey will be conducted by a qualified Biologist within three days prior to the initiation of construction (including demolition of structures). The nesting bird/raptor survey area will include a buffer of 100 feet around the work area for nesting birds and a buffer of 500 feet around the work area for nesting raptors. This survey can be combined with the pre-construction burrowing owl survey described in MM BIO -1. If the Biologist does not find any active nests in or immediately adjacent to the impact area, construction activities can proceed. If the Biologist detects an active nest within or immediately adjacent to the construction area and determines that the nest may be impacted, or breeding activities substantially disrupted by increased activity around the nest, the Biologist will determine an appropriate protective buffer around the nest depending on the sensitivity of the species and the nature of the construction activity. The protective buffer shall be between 25 to 100 feet for nesting birds and 300 to 500 feet for nesting raptors. No work will be allowed within the protective buffer until nesting activity has ended, as determined by a qualified Biologist. Any protective buffers will be flagged clearly in the field, mapped as “Environmentally Sensitive Areas,” and the ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 16 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to a Specific Date Met? maps provided to the Project Applicant, their designee (e.g., Construction Supervisor), and the City. Construction can proceed within the protective buffer when the qualified Biologist has determined that the nest is no longer active (i.e., fledglings have left the nest, or the nest has failed). General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 17 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met? Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Planning 28) A grading permit shall be obtained from the City of San Jacinto prior to the commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right- of-way. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Planning 29) A copy of all pages of these Conditions shall be included in the construction drawing packages for grading plans. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Planning 30) All imported soils/fill shall be tested to ensure Contaminants of Concern (COC’s) meet the applicable screening levels as outlined in DTSC’s Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Guidance Manual. The applicant/developer shall provide the following to the Planning Department for review: a. Report of testing performed. b. Documentation of the origins of the soil/fill material, if applicable, sampling be conducted to ensure that the imported soil/fill material are suitable for the intended land use. c. The soil sampling should include analysis based on the source of the soil/fill and knowledge of prior land use. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Planning 31) Mitigation Measure BIO-3. Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Fee. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall pay the MSHCP mitigation fee as directed by the City of San Jacinto based on the most current rates. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 18 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met? Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Planning 32) Mitigation Measure BIO-4. MSHCP Construction Minimization Measures. The Project Applicant and their designee (i.e., Construction Contractors) shall follow required MSHCP Construction Minimization Measures (Section 7.5.3 of the MSHCP). Applicable construction minimization measures are listed below. Plans for water pollution and erosion control will be prepared for all Discretionary Projects involving the movement of earth in excess of 50 cubic yards. The plans will describe sediment and hazardous materials control, dewatering or diversion structures, fueling and equipment management practices, use of plant material for erosion control. Plans will be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. Timing of construction activities will consider seasonal requirements for breeding birds and migratory non-resident species. Habitat clearing will be avoided during species active breeding season defined as March 1 to June 30. Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented until such time soils are determined to be successfully stabilized. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Planning 33) Mitigation Measure CUL-1. Archaeological Monitor. The Project proponent shall retain a Project Archaeologist prior to the initiation of ground-disturbing activities to monitor ground-disturbing activities occurring within native sediment (in situ material). In the event that archaeological resources are discovered at the Proposed Project Site, the handling of the discovered resources shall occur, as described below. All artifacts discovered shall be inventoried and analyzed by the Project Archaeologist. If any artifacts of Native American ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 19 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met? origin are discovered, all activities in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 50-foot radius) shall stop, and the Project Archaeologist shall notify the property owner and tribes identified by the NAHC as being affiliated with the area. The Project Archaeologist and Tribal Representative will analyze the Native American artifacts for identification as everyday life and/or religious or sacred items, cultural affiliation, temporal placement, and function, as deemed possible. The significance of Native American resources shall be evaluated in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and shall consider the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the affiliated tribes. All items found in association with Native American human remains shall be considered grave goods or sacred in origin and subject to special handling. Non-Native American artifacts shall be inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership), function, and temporal placement. After analysis and reporting, these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the property owner, as deemed appropriate. Once grading activities have ceased or the Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the lead agency and Tribal Representative, determines that monitoring is no longer necessary, monitoring activities can be discontinued. A report of findings, including an itemized inventory of recovered artifacts, shall be prepared upon completion of the steps outlined above. A copy of the report shall also be filed with the EIC. General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 20 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met? Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Planning 34) Mitigation Measure CUL-2. Discovery of Human Remains. All discovered human remains shall be treated with respect and dignity. California State law (California Health & Safety Code Section 7050.5) and federal law and regulations ([Archaeological Resources Protection Act 16 United States Code (USC) 470 & 43 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 7], [Native American Graves Protection & Repatriation Act 25 USC 3001 & 43 CFR 10] and [Public Lands, Interior 43 CFR 8365.1 –7]) require a defined protocol if human remains are discovered in the State of California regardless of whether the remains are modern or archaeological in origin. If human remains, grave goods, ceremonial items, and/or sacred items are encountered, work will immediately halt within the immediate area and any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains, and a 100-foot ESA boundary will be established to protect the find from impact, and the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians and the City of San Jacinto Planning Division shall be immediately notified. In accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e), if human remains are found, the Riverside County Coroner’s office shall be notified by the permittee within 24 hours of the discovery. County Coroner’s determination regarding the origin of the remains and any required notification is described in Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e). No further excavation or disturbance of the potential human remains, or any area reasonably suspected to overlie additional remains, shall occur until a determination has been made, any notifications have been sent and received, and the Riverside County Coroner’s Office has cleared the site. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 21 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met? Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Planning 35) Mitigation Measure GEO-1. Paleontological Treatment Plan. In the event that potential paleontological resources are discovered during ground- disturbing activities, work will stop in that area and within 30 feet of the find until a qualified paleontologist can assess the significance of the find and, if necessary, develop appropriate treatment measures. Treatment measures may include monitoring by a qualified paleontologist during construction-related ground- disturbing activities. The monitor will retain the option to reduce monitoring if it is determined that the sediments were previously disturbed. Monitoring may also be reduced if potentially fossiliferous units are not present or, if present, are determined to have a low potential to contain fossil resources. The monitor will be equipped to salvage fossils and samples of sediments as they are unearthed and will be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. Recovered specimens will be prepared to a point of identification and permanent preservation, including washing of sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates. Specimens will be curated into a professional, accredited museum repository with permanent retrievable storage. A report of findings, with an appended itemized inventory of specimens, will be prepared and will signify completion of the mitigation. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 22 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met? Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Planning 36) Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Prior to grading permit issuance, the developer shall enter into a Treatment and Disposition Agreement (TDA) with the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians to address treatment and disposition of archaeological, or Tribal Cultural Resources and human remains associated with the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians that may be uncovered or otherwise discovered during ground-disturbing activities related to the project, if monitoring deemed necessary by Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians. The TDA will establish provisions for tribal monitoring and shall be submitted to the Planning Division once it has been executed. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Planning 37) If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, which will determine the identity of and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD must complete the inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. If human remains, grave goods, ceremonial items, and/or sacred items are encountered, work will immediately halt within the immediate area and any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains, and a 100 -foot ESA boundary will be established to protect the find fro m impact, and the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians and the City of San Jacinto Planning Division shall be immediately notified. In accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e), if human remains are found, the Riverside County Coroner’s office shall be notified by the permittee within 24 hours of the discovery. County Coroner’s determination regarding the origin of the remains and any required notification is described in Section 7050.5 of the California Health and ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 23 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met? Safety Code and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e). No further excavation or disturbance of the potential human remains, or any area reasonably suspected to overlie additional remains, shall occur until a determination has been made, any notification s have been sent and received, and the Riverside County Coroner’s Office has cleared the site. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Planning 38) The Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) prohibits the take (including killing, capturing, selling, trading, and transport) of protected migratory bird species without prior authorization by the Department of Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The list of migratory bird species protected by the law is primarily based on bird families and species included in the four international conservation treaties that the U.S. entered into with Canada in 1916, Mexico in 1936, Japan in 1972, and Russia in 1976. The list of birds protected under the law can be found under Title 50 Part 10.13 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Additionally, California Fish and Game Code Section 3503.5 states that it is “unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the order Falconiformes or Strigiformes (birds of prey) or to take, possess, or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird except as otherwise provided by this code or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto.” California Fish and Game Code Section 3511 prohibits the taking of any bird listed as fully protected and Section 3515 states that is it unlawful to take any non-game migratory bird protected under the MBTA. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Planning 39) A copy of all pages of these Conditions shall be included in the construction drawing packages for grading plans. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 24 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met? Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Planning 40) The proposed site design BMPs selected for this project have been approved in concept. The project shall submit a Final Addendum WQMP including plans and details providing the elevations and slopes of the three bioretention basins and other details for the proposed structural BMPs. The Public Works Department shall review and approve the Final WQMP document, plans and details. The Public Works Department shall review and approve the Final WQMP document, plans and details. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Planning 41) The development shall be subject to all provisions of City of San Jacinto Municipal Code Chapter 13.44, which establishes Urban Stormwater Runoff Management and discharge controls to improve Water Quality and comply with Federal/State Regulations and any subsequent amendments, revisions or ordinances pertaining thereto. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Planning 42) A Final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted and approved, including a project description, and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The Water Quality Management Plan shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the City’s adopted requirements. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 25 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met? Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Planning 43) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger’s Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City for coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Construction Permit. The applicant/developer shall provide documentation to the City for review. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Planning 44) The contractor shall provide a letter that agreeing to follow the City’s General Plan and Noise Ordinance. In addition, the letter shall indicate the contractor shall implement the following best practices during the construction phase of the development. a. Limit construction to the daytime hours (7:00 AM to 7:00 PM) and prohibit construction on Sundays and holidays. b. At least 10 days prior to the start of construction activities, a sign shall be posted at the entrance(s) to the job site, clearly visible to the public, that includes permitted construction on days and hours, as well as telephone numbers of the City’s and contractor’s authorized representative that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint. If the authorized contractor’s representative receives a complaint, he/she shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report to the City. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 26 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met? c. During the entire active construction period, equipment and trucks used for the project construction shall utilize the best available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds), wherever feasible. d. During the entire active construction period, stationary noise sources shall be located as far from sensitive receptors as possible, and they shall be incorporated to the extent feasible. e. Select haul routes that avoid the greatest amount of sensitive use areas. Avoid soil hauling through residential areas. f. Signs shall be posted at the job site entrance(s), within the on-site construction zones, and along queueing lanes (if any) to reinforce the prohibition of unnecessary engine idling. All other equipment shall be turned off if not in use for more than 5 minutes. g. During the entire active construction period and to the extent feasible, the use of noise-producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. The construction manager shall use smart back-up alarms, which, automatically adjust the alarm level based on the background noise level or switch off back- up alarms and replace them with human spotters in compliance with all safety requirements and laws. h. No radios or other sound equipment shall be used at this site unless required for emergency response by the contractor. i. The City shall require the developer to require that all construction equipment be operated with mandated noise control equipment (mufflers or silencers). Enforcement will be accomplished by random General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 27 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met? field inspections by applicant personnel during construction activities. j. Equipment not in use for five minutes shall be shut off. k. Equipment shall be maintained and operated such that loads are secured from rattling or banging. l. Construction employees shall be trained in the proper operation and use of equipment consistent with these mitigation measures, including no unnecessary revving of equipment. The applicant / developer shall provide a letter from the contractor agreeing to implement this condition. 45) The developer shall comply with the following requirements to the satisfaction of the Building & Safety Division: a. The site shall be watered on an on-going basis to control dust during construction and grading. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Building & Safety / Planning b. There shall be regular street sweeping and clean up of adjacent streets to minimize the amount of dust put into the air from motor vehicle travel. ☐ c. Mud and dirt shall be removed from construction equipment and vehicles prior to leaving the site to ensure they do not spread dirt into the street. An energy conservation plan showing compliance with Title 24 (Building Standards) of the California Administrative Code shall also be provided. General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 28 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met? Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Building & Safety / Planning 46) Stored backfill material shall be covered with water resistant material during periods of heavy precipitation to reduce the potential for rainfall erosion of stored backfill material. If covering is not feasible, then measures such as the use of straw bales or sandbags shall be used to capture and hold eroded material on the project site for future cleanup. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Building & Safety / Planning 47) All exposed, disturbed soil (trenches, stored backfill, etc.) shall be sprayed with water or soil binders twice a day, or more frequently if fugitive dust is observed migrating from the project site during future construction activities. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 29 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met? Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Building & Safety / Planning 48) Prior to and during grading and construction, should an accidental release of a hazardous material occur, the following actions will be implemented: a. Construction activities in the immediate area will be immediately stopped; appropriate regulatory agencies will be notified; immediate actions will be implemented to limit the volume and area impacted by the contaminant; the contaminated material, primarily soil, shall be collected and removed to a location where it can be treated or disposed of in accordance with the regulations in place at the time of the event; b. Any transport of hazardous waste from the property shall be carried out by a registered hazardous waste transporter; and testing shall be conducted to verify that any residual concentrations of the accidentally released material are below the regulatory remediation goal at the time of the event. All of the above sampling or remediation activities related to the contamination will be conducted under the oversight of Riverside County Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) Site Mitigation Unit (SMU). All of the above actions shall be documented and made available to the appropriate regulatory agencies prior to closure (a determination of the regulatory agency that a site has been remediated to a threshold that poses no hazard to humans) of the contaminated area. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Engineering 49) The developer/property owner shall have approved grading and improvement plans, executed grading agreement as directed by the City Engineer, and posted securities. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 30 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Met? Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Engineering 50) The developer/property owner shall submit the following plans and reports to the City Engineer for review and approval: a. Onsite Grading and Erosion Control Plans – Plans shall show the approved WDID No. b. Geotechnical Report (for reference) c. Storm Drain Improvement Plans d. Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis e. Final WQMP (for reference) including WDID No. f. Traffic Signal Plan The design shall comply with, RCFCD, and City of San Jacinto, and ADA most recent standards, criteria, and requirement and in effect at the time of construction and shall be coordinated with the approved plans of the adjacent developments. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 31 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Building Permit (Phase 1) Met? Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Planning 51) The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD rules, Rule 201 – Permit to Construct and Rule 203 – Permit to Operate by obtaining the proper permits from SCAQMD. The applicant/developer shall provide documentation that these permits were obtained. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Planning 52) All plans submitted shall be in substantial conformance to the approved Planned Development Permit and Tentative Tract Map. This condition applies to site plans, grading plans, landscape plans, building plans, elevations, and all other illustrations, text, or plans submitted to the City in connection with the project. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Planning 53) Grading and public improvements shall be installed in accordance with city standards and specifications. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Planning 54) Building permit plans shall be substantially consistent with plans approved through this entitlement, as determined by City Planning. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 32 of 59 Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Planning 55) A Site Plan & Design Review plan shall be submitted and approved by the City. The design review shall be consistent with the Residential Development Design Regulations (Section 17.425.020) and other relevant sections of the Development Code. At a minimum it should consist of: a. A precise grading plan with the plotting of homes, setbacks from property lines, paved areas, slopes, etc.; b. Floor plans; c. Architectural elevations (in color) of all sides; d. Typical front yard landscaping; e. Entry monumentation, and parkway landscape treatments; f. Wall and Fence Plan that includes a decorative block wall around the perimeter of the project and interior fencing; and g. Common mailbox architectural treatment h. Elevations of houses facing Esplanade Avenue, Cawston Avenue, and 7th Street shall be enhanced. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Planning 56) Mitigation Measure HAZ-1. Asbestos Containing Materials Survey. Prior to the disturbance of any suspect Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) during construction or demolition activities at the Proposed Project Site, a comprehensive survey shall be required to sample materials on -site and confirm the presence or absence of ACMs. If such materials are identified and need to be disturbed, repaired, or removed, a licensed abatement contractor shall be consulted further. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 33 of 59 Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Planning 57) Mitigation Measure HAZ-2. Methane Testing. Prior to the issuance of building permits, methane testing shall be conducted by a licensed engineer, geologist, or registered environmental assessor, and as necessary, shall include measures to reduce concentrations of methane to an acceptable level. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Planning 58) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall record a “Water Quality Management Plan and Urban Runoff BMP Transfer Access and Maintenance Agreement,” to provide public notice of the requirement to implement the approved Final project-specific WQMP and the maintenance requirements associated with the WQMP. The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall ensure the following, pursuant to Section XII. I. of the 2010 NPDES Permit: Field verification that structural Site Design, Source Control, and Treatment Control BMPs are designed, constructed and functional in accordance with the approved Final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). City WQMP Inspector will be notified for required inspections during construction. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Planning 59) Submit a detailed landscape and irrigation plan for review and approval. The landscape plans shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect in conformance with Chapter 17.325 – Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation and Section 17.325.060 – Landscape and Irrigation Submittal Package Requirements of the Development Code and the City Landscape Design Guidelines for review and approval by the City Landscape Architect. Plans should be submitted at least 30 days prior to the expected date of permit issuance. The Landscape and Irrigation Submittal Package shall include: a. A completed application packet provided by the City; b. The Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet, including the MAWA ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 34 of 59 and ETWU; Note the ETo rate for San Jacinto is 56.8 per State guidelines. c. The soils management report; d. The landscape design plan; e. The irrigation design plan; f. The grading plan. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Planning 60) Submit a Fence and Wall Plan for review that shows the following: a. The developer will work with any adjacent property owners to remove existing walls/fencing (double walls are not permitted). b. The developer will show on the plans how they will connect to the existing wall located to the west. Proposed wall should be similar in color, material, pilaster size, and caps. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Building & Safety 61) The contract with demolition and construction contractors shall include the requirement that all materials that can be recycled shall be salvaged and recycled. This includes, but is not limited to, wood, metals, concrete, road base, and asphalt. The developer shall submit a recycling plan to the City for review and approval prior to the start of demolition/construction activities to accomplish this objective. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Riverside County Fire Department 62) Residential Fire Sprinklers: Residential fire sprinklers are required in all one and two-family dwellings per the California Residential Code (CRC). Plans must be submitted to the Office of the Fire Marshal for review and be approved prior to installation. Reference CFC as amended by Health and Safety Code section 18938.5. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 35 of 59 Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Riverside County Fire Department 63) Phased Construction Access and Water Supply: If construction is phased, an approved phasing plan shall be approved by the Fire Department. Each phase shall provide approved access and water supply for fire protection prior to any construction. Reference CFC as amended by Health and Safety Code section 18938.5. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Riverside County Fire Department 64) Fire and Life Safety Requirements - Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Department reviews any subsequent submittals. These conditions will be based on California Fire Code (CFC), California Building Code (CBC), and related codes/standards adopted and amended at the time of construction plan submittal or as applicable pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 18938.5. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Riverside County Fire Department 65) Fire Protection Water Supplies/Fire Flow - Minimum fire flow for the construction of all buildings is required per CFC Appendix B. Prior to building permit issuance for new construction, the applicant shall provide documentation to the Fire Department to show there exists a water system capable of delivering the required fire flow. Specific design features may increase or decrease the required fire flow. Reference CFC 507.3 as amended. Will Serve Letters from the responsible water purveyor are required prior to a map recordation. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 36 of 59 Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Riverside County Fire Department 66) Fire Protection Water Supplies/Hydrants – The minimum number of fire hydrants required, as well as the location and spacing of fire hydrants, shall comply with the CFC Appendix C. Fire hydrants shall be located no more than 600 feet from all portions of the exterior of the building along an approved route from a fire apparatus access road. Where new water mains are extended along streets and hydrants are not needed for protection of structures, standard fire hydrants shall be provided as spacing not to exceed 1000 feet along streets for transportation hazards. The size and number of outlets required for the approved fire hydrants are 4” x 2 ½”. Final fire hydrant locations shall be determined during the fire water plan review. Reference CFC as amended. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Riverside County Fire Department 67) Tract Water Plans – If fire hydrants are required to be installed, applicant/developer shall furnish the water system fire hydrant plans to Fire Department for review and approval prior to building permit issuance. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, and shall confirm hydrant type, location, spacing, and minimum fire flow. Once plans are signed and approved by the local water authority, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Department for review and approval. Reference CFC as amended. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Riverside County Fire Department 68) Fire Department Access - Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided within 300 feet of all exterior portions of buildings, unless otherwise approved by the Fire Department. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of no less than 24 feet. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads exceeding 150 feet shall provide an approved turn around. The minimum required turning radius of a fire apparatus access road is 38 feet outside radius and 14 feet inside radius. The construction of the fire apparatus access roads shall be all weather and capable of sustaining 75,000 lbs. Unless otherwise approved, the grade of a fire apparatus access road shall not exceed 16 percent and the cross slope shall not ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 37 of 59 exceed 2.5 percent. The angles of approach and departure for fire apparatus access roads shall be a maximum of 6 percent grade change for 25 feet of approach/departure. Reference CFC as amended and Riverside County Fire Department Policies and Standards. Fire Lane marking: Identification and marking of fire lanes, including curb details and signage, shall comply with all Riverside County Fire Department Standards as of the Vesting Date. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Riverside County Fire Department 69) Fire Department Access Turn Around - Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with a bulb turnaround at the terminus measuring a minimum of 38 feet outside radius and 14 feet inside radius. Parallel parking around the perimeter of the bulb is acceptable provided the bulb outside turning radius is increased by 8 feet. In-lieu of a bulb, a hammer-head type turnaround is acceptable where the top of the “T” dimension is 120 feet with the stem in the center. Additional turnaround designs may be acceptable as approved by the Fire Department. Reference CFC as amended and Riverside County Fire Department Policies and Standards as of the Vesting Date. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 38 of 59 Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Riverside County Fire Department 70) Secondary Access - Additional fire apparatus access roads based on the potential for impairment by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions, anticipated magnitude of a potential incident, or other factors that could limit access shall be required by the Fire Department. Secondary access fire apparatus access roads shall provide independent egress/access for the area, as approved by the Fire Department. Secondary access fire apparatus access roads shall be as remote as practical from the primary fire apparatus access road to reduce the possibility that both routes will be obstructed by a single emergency. Additional fire apparatus access roads based on the potential for impairment by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions, anticipated magnitude of a potential incident, or other factors that could limit access may be required by the Fire Department. Reference CFC as amended and Riverside County Fire Department Policies and Standards as of the Vesting Date. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Riverside County Fire Department 71) Traffic Calming Devices - Requests for installation of traffic calming designs/devices on fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted and approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. Reference CFC as amended. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 1 Engineering 72) The developer/property owner shall submit to Building and Safety a compaction certification from the Soils Engineer in compliance with the approved geotechnical/soils report and the pad elevation certification from the Civil Engineer in compliance with the approved Precise Grading Plan. General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 39 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Acceptance of Public Improvements (Phase 1 and 2) Met? Prior to Acceptance of Public Improvements Special Districts 73) Developer will ensure that funds are available for maintenance, in the event that improvements are completed, and ready for City takeover, PRIOR to levy collection. a. The first installment of collected assessments is paid to the City in January of each year. In the event that takeover is requested before the first installment is paid to the City, the Developer will either: i. Pay an advancement of funds for the months included from takeover to collection (amount to be set by cost estimate at annexation) OR ii. Continue to maintain improvements until City has acquired enough funds to sustain maintenance or until first assessment installment is received, whichever is first. ☐ Prior to Acceptance of Public Improvements Special Districts 74) Upon acceptance and City take-over, developer will ensure that a minimum of one-year warranty is in place for landscape, irrigation, and basin integrity, inclusive pumps and mechanical equipment used for the maintenance of the improvements taken over. ☐ Prior to Acceptance of Public Improvements Special Districts 75) Parks and associated facilities shall be inspected by a Certified Access Specialist through the Division of the State Architect ensuring compliance with applicable state and federal construction-related accessibility standards. A copy of the disability access inspection certificate and the CASp inspection report shall be provided to the City. Any accessibility barriers documented will need to be remedied prior to acceptance of the park by the City. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 40 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase1) Met? Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Planning 76) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall submit the following items for the landscape and irrigation development and maintenance: The signed Landscape Certificate of Completion pursuant to Section 17.325.070– Certificate of Completion of the Development Code; The irrigation scheduling pursuant to Section 17.325.080 – Irrigation Scheduling of the Development Code; The Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Schedule pursuant to Section 17.325.090 – Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Schedule of the Development Code; and The Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and Irrigation Water Use Analysis pursuant to Section 17.325.100 — Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and Irrigation Water Use Analysis of the Development Code. Pursuant to Section 17.325.150 – Maintenance of the Development Code, all installed landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continually maintained. Maintenance shall consist of regular watering, mowing, pruning, fertilizing, clearing of debris and weeds, monitoring for pests and disease, the removal and timely replacement of dead plants, and the repair and timely replacement of irrigation systems, and integrated architectural features. ☐ Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Planning 77) The subdivider shall pay a fee for neighborhood and community park and recreation purposes according to the standards and formula contained in Title 16 – Subdivision Code, as applicable to each phase contemplated by the final map. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 41 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase1) Met? Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Planning 78) The developer shall pay all required Development Impact Fees (DIF) for parkland acquisition, parkland development, and park facilities in effect on the Vesting Date prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or final inspection.at the time of permit issuance for each home. Upon the City’s acceptance of the completed parks, the developer will receive a refund of the applicable fees pursuant to Title 16 of the Municipal Code. The amount of the refund shall not exceed the actual cost of the parkland a cquisition, parkland development, and park facilities, nor shall it exceed the amount of the fees initially paid. No cross-category credit or refund shall be provided. The developer must provide documentation to the City demonstrating that the refunds do not exceed the actual costs incurred. ☐ Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Building & Safety 79) The City has adopted Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees and the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. This Project shall be subject to payment of these fees prior certificate of occupancy unless exempted by the ordinance establishing the TUMF program. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of the enabling ordinance and based on the Vesting Date (3/31/2025). ☐ Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Building & Safety 80) Specific addresses for each building shall be provided to make such number plainly visible from the public street, avenue, court, or alley upon which property fronts, and shall be contrasting color and background. ☐ Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Engineering 81) The following items need to be approved: a. Approved WDID No. b. Geotechnical Report (for reference) c. Storm Drain Improvement Plans ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 42 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase1) Met? d. Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis e. Final WQMP (for reference) including WDID No. The design shall comply with, RCFCD and City of San Jacinto most recent standards, criteria, and requirement and in effect at the time of construction and shall be coordinated with the approved plans of the adjacent developments. Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Engineering 82) Construct all interior streets within Phase 1. Interior Streets shall be private with a full width of 52 feet to provide for 36 feet asphalt paving (using TI of 5.5 and PG 64-10), curb and gutter at 18 feet on both sides of centerline, an 8 - foot parkway consisting of landscaping, a 6-sidewalk, and streetlights subject to photometric analysis per City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside and Caltrans standards. A 24-foot wide access shall be provided for Fire access at all times. Street parking shall be restricted to one side of the street. ☐ Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Engineering 83) Construct Street “A” from 7th Street to the southern edge of Street L. Street A shall be private with a full width of 56 feet improved to provide for 36 feet asphalt paving (using TI of 5.5 and PG 64-10) , curb and gutter at 18 feet on both sides of centerline, a 10-foot parkway consisting of landscaping, a 6- sidewalk, and streetlights subject to photometric analysis per City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside and Caltrans standards. A 24-foot wide access shall be provided for Fire at all times. Street parking shall be restricted to one side of the street. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 43 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase1) Met? Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Engineering 84) Construct Street “K” from Cawston Avenue to the western edge of Street “A”. Street K shall be private with a full width of 80 feet improved to provide for 40 feet asphalt paving (using TI of 5.5 and PG 64 -10) , curb and gutter at 20 feet on both sides of centerline, a 20-foot parkway consisting of landscaping, a 6-sidewalk, and streetlights subject to photometric analysis per City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside and Caltrans standards. ☐ Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Engineering 85) Seventh Street shall be improved to provide for a 50 -foot wide halfwidth right-of-way, asphalt paving (using a TI of 9.0 and PG 70 -10), 8-inch curb and gutter 32 feet south of centerline, a Class II: Buffered Bike Lane per the City of San Jacinto Trails Master Plan, and an 18-foot wide parkway consisting of landscaping, a 6-foot sidewalk, and streetlights subject to photometric analysis per City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, and Caltrans standards. If the existing pavement is in good condition the developer/property owner may use grind and overlay technique as determined by the City Engineer. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 44 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase1) Met? Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Engineering 86) Cawston Avenue shall be improved to provide for a 50-foot wide halfwidth right-of-way, asphalt paving (using a TI of 9.0 and PG 70-10), 8-inch curb and gutter 32 feet west of centerline, a Class II: Buffered Bike Lane per the City of San Jacinto Trails Master Plan, and an 18-foot wide parkway consisting of landscaping, a 6-foot sidewalk, and streetlights subject to photometric analysis per City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, and Caltrans standards. If the existing pavement is in good condition the developer/property owner may use grind and overlay technique as determined by the City Engineer. ☐ Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Engineering 87) A traffic signal shall be installed at the intersection of Cawston Avenue and Seventh Street. The intersection shall be improved to accommodate the required vehicular travel lanes and pedestrian crossings as recommended by the project’s traffic engineer and as directed by the City Engineer. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 45 of 59 Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Engineering 88) This Property is located in the San Jacinto Valley Area Drainage Plan which was adopted by the City of San Jacinto pursuant to Ordinance 13 -01 and Section 66001, et seq, of the Government Code and that said property is subject to fees for said drainage area. Notice is further given that, pursuant to Ordinance 13-01, payment of the drainage fees applicable to each phase shall be paid to the City of San Jacinto prior to certificate of occupancy of the 1st building permit for the phase, and that the property owner shall pay the fee required at the rate in effect at the upon the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or final inspection ☐ Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Engineering 89) All residential driveways shall be constructed per County of Riverside Standard No. 207. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 46 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase1) Met? Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Engineering 90) All sidewalks shall comply with Riverside County Standard 401. ☐ Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Engineering 91) Curb ramps shall include truncated domes per Riverside County Standard 403. ☐ Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Engineering 92) The detention basin on Lot “A” is proposed to be maintained by the City. The basin shall be constructed per City of San Jacinto and Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCD) standards and design guidelines. To dewater the basin, a sump pump and force main is required. The developer purposes to pump nuisance flows to a bubble-up structure in the Seventh Street right-of-way just west of Anza Trail. From there, the storm water would flow through the gutter to a catch basin at Serrano Street where it would be collected and discharged into a detention basin constructed with the Esplanade Specific Plan. The entire system, including the Esplanade Specific Plan basin, must be accepted by the City for maintenance prior to the issuance of the 1st occupancy permit for this development. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 47 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase1) Met? Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Engineering 93) The developer shall provide water and sewer services to each lot in accordance with the requirements of the appropriate utility purveyor. This development is within the City of San Jacinto sewer service area, and the EMWD water service area. Water and sewer improvements shall be designed and installed per EMWD Standards. ☐ Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Engineering 94) Existing power poles with cables 66kV and under along the alley shall be removed and cables undergrounded. Poles with cables over 66kV shall be relocated as necessary, but other utilities on the pole must be undergrounded. Provide an undergrounding of utilities study by a utility consultant/electrical engineer analyzing and determining the extent of conformance. ☐ Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Engineering 95) The developer/property owner shall provide for utility trench surface repair as directed by the City Engineer if applicable. ☐ Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Special Districts 96) Development must comply with Storm Water Basin & Pump Specifications and Standards. Privately maintained storm water and water quality systems will be required to submit an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication for the basin lot. ☐ Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Special Districts 97) Development must comply with Landscape and Irrigation Design Guidelines. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 48 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase1) Met? Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Special Districts 98) Landscape improvements shall include irrigation meters and backflow devices with tampering preventive cage, exclusive for right-of-way landscaping. Right-of-way landscaping must be divided from private property by form or mow-curb or other approved materials. ☐ Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 1 Special Districts 99) Landscape areas in the right-of-way shall include an independent irrigation control system, with separate electric meter, exclusive for right-of-way landscaping. Cal-Sense version approved by the Public Utilities Superintendent is required for City maintained irrigation areas. (Must be operational and certified by Cal-Sense). ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 49 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Building Permits (Phase 2) Met? Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 2 Planning 100) All Phase 1 Conditions of Approval Prior to Occupancy Conditions are required to be completed. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 2 Planning 101) All required infrastructure including, streets, basins and landscape setbacks, shall be complete to the satisfaction of the Planning Division and the City Engineer. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 2 Planning 102) The applicant shall submit a revised plot plan that clearly illustrates all required setbacks measured from the property lines. a. The minimum setback from the property line to the garage shall be no less than twenty (20) feet. b. The applicant shall identify rear elevations that face the public right-of-way and show how they will be architecturally enhanced. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 2 Planning 103) A Site Plan & Design Review plan shall be submitted and approved by the City. The design review shall be consistent with the Residential Development Design Regulations (Section 17.425.020) and other relevant sections of the Development Code. At a minimum it should consist of: a. A precise grading plan with the plotting of homes, setbacks from property lines, paved areas, slopes, etc.; b. Floor plans; ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 50 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Building Permits (Phase 2) Met? c. Architectural elevations (in color) of all sides; d. Typical front yard landscaping; e. Entry monumentation, and parkway landscape treatments; f. Wall and Fence Plan that includes a decorative block wall around the perimeter of the project and interior fencing; and g. Common mailbox architectural treatment h. Elevations of houses facing Esplanade Avenue, Cawston Avenue, and 7th Street shall be enhanced. General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 51 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Building Permits (Phase 2) Met? Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 2 Planning 104) Submit a detailed landscape and irrigation plan for review and approval. The landscape plans shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect in conformance with Chapter 17.325 – Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation and Section 17.325.060 – Landscape and Irrigation Submittal Package Requirements of the Development Code and the City Landscape Design Guidelines for review and approval by the City Landscape Architect. Plans should be submitted at least 30 days prior to the expected date of permit issuance. The Landscape and Irrigation Submittal Package shall include: a. A completed application packet provided by the City; b. The Water Efficient Landscape Worksheet, including the MAWA and ETWU; Note the ETo rate for San Jacinto is 56.8 per State guidelines. c. The soils management report; d. The landscape design plan; e. The irrigation design plan; f. The grading plan. ☐ Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 2 Planning 105) Submit a Fence and Wall Plan for review that shows the following: a. The developer will work with any adjacent property owners to remove existing walls/fencing (double walls are not permitted). b. The developer will show on the plans how they will connect to the existing wall located to the west. Proposed wall should be similar in color, material, pilaster size, and caps. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 52 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to Issuance of Building Permits (Phase 2) Met? Prior to Issuance of Building Permits of Phase 2 Planning 106) Submit a Fence and Wall Plan for review that shows the following: a. The developer will work with any adjacent property owners to remove existing walls/fencing (double walls are not permitted). b. The developer will show on the plans how they will connect to the existing wall located to the west. Proposed wall should be similar in color, material, pilaster size, and caps. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 53 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase 2) Met? Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 2 Planning 107) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall submit the following items for the landscape and irrigation development and maintenance: • The signed Landscape Certificate of Completion pursuant to Section 17.325.070– Certificate of Completion of the Development Code; • The irrigation scheduling pursuant to Section 17.325.080 – Irrigation Scheduling of the Development Code; • The Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Schedule pursuant to Section 17.325.090 – Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Schedule of the Development Code; and • The Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and Irrigation Water Use Analysis pursuant to Section 17.325.100 — Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and Irrigation Water Use Analysis of the Development Code. Pursuant to Section 17.325.150 – Maintenance of the Development Code, all installed landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continually maintained. Maintenance shall consist of regular watering, mowing, pruning, fertilizing, clearing of debris and weeds, monitoring for pests and disease, the removal and timely replacement of dead plants, and the repair and timely replacement of irrigation systems, and integrated architectural features. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 54 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase 2) Met? Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 2 Planning 108) The developer shall pay all required Development Impact Fees (DIF) for parkland acquisition, parkland development, and park facilities in effect on the Vesting Date prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy or final inspection.at the time of permit issuance for each home. Upon the City’s acceptance of the completed parks, the developer will receive a refund of the applicable fees pursuant to Title 16 of the Municipal Code. The amount of the refund shall not exceed the actual cost of the parkland acquisition, parkland development, and park facilities, nor shall it exceed the amount of the fees initially paid. No cross-category credit or refund shall be provided. The developer must provide documentation to the City demonstrating that the refunds do not exceed the actual costs incurred. Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 2 Building & Safety 109) The City has adopted Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees and the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program. This Project shall be subject to payment of these fees prior certificate of occupancy unless exempted by the ordinance establishing the TUMF program. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of the enabling ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in effect on the Vesting Date (3/31/2025). Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 2 Building & Safety 110) Specific addresses for each building shall be provided to make such number plainly visible from the public street, avenue, court, or alley upon which property fronts, and shall be contrasting color and background. General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 55 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase 2) Met? Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 2 Engineering 111) Construct all interior streets within Phase 2. Interior Streets shall be private with a full width of 52 feet to provide for 36 feet asphalt paving (using TI of 5.5 and PG 64-10), curb and gutter at 18 feet on both sides of centerline, an 8-foot parkway consisting of landscaping, a 6-sidewalk, and streetlights subject to photometric analysis per City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside and Caltrans standards. A 24-foot wide access shall be provided for Fire access at all times. Street parking shall be restricted to one side of the street. Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 2 Engineering 112) Esplanade shall be improved to provide for a 73 -foot wide halfwidth right-of-way, asphalt paving (using a TI of 9.5 and PG 70-10), 8-inch curb and gutter 38 feet north of centerline, a Class I: Multi-Use Path per the City of San Jacinto Trails Master Plan, and an 35-foot wide parkway consisting of landscaping, and streetlights subject to photometric analysis per City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, and Caltrans standards. As part of the CIP program, the City is planning to widen Esplanade Avenue from Warren Road to Sanderson Avenue in 2026 and will include traffic signals at the intersections of Cawston Avenue and Sanderson Avenue, with two more lanes and a sidewalk. Streetlights will not be constructed as part of these improvements. The developer shall coordinate with the City on the installation of improvements. If the existing pavement is in good condition the developer/property owner may use grind and overlay technique as determined by the City Engineer. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 56 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase 2) Met? Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 2 Engineering 113) The developer shall provide water and sewer services to each lot in accordance with the requirements of the appropriate utility purveyor. This development is within the City of San Jacinto sewer service area, and the EMWD water service area. Water and sewer improvements shall be designed and installed per EMWD Standards. ☐ Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 2 Engineering 114) Existing power poles with cables 66kV and under along the alley shall be removed and cables undergrounded. Poles with cables over 66kV shall be relocated as necessary, but other utilities on the pole must be undergrounded. Provide an undergrounding of utilities study by a utility consultant/electrical engineer analyzing and determining the extent of conformance. ☐ Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 2 Engineering 115) The developer/property owner shall provide for utility trench surface repair as directed by the City Engineer if applicable. ☐ Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 2 Engineering 116) A traffic signal shall be installed at the intersection of Cawston Avenue and Cottonwood Avenue. The intersection shall be improved to accommodate the required vehicular travel lanes and pedestrian crossings as recommended by the project’s traffic engineer and as directed by the City Engineer. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 57 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (Phase 2) Met? Prior to the Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy of Phase 2 Engineering 117) The following items need to be approved: a. approved WDID No. b. Geotechnical Report (for reference) c. Storm Drain Improvement Plans d. Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis e. Final WQMP (for reference) including WDID No. The design shall comply with, RCFCD and City of San Jacinto most recent standards, criteria, and requirement and in effect at the time of construction and shall be coordinated with the approved plans of the adjacent developments. ☐ Timing Responsible Department Operational Met? Operational Planning 118) The Project is required to comply with San Jacinto Development Code Section 17.300.080 which requires all exterior lighting to be shielded or modified and located so as to eliminate spillover illumination or glare beyond the property line or upward into the sky. ☐ Operational Planning 119) All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a thriving condition free of weeds, trash, and debris. ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 58 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Operational Met? Ongoing Planning 120) The erection (including excavation), demolition, alteration or repair of any building shall occur between the hours of seven a.m. and seven p.m. on weekdays and Saturdays, and between nine a.m. and six p.m. on Sundays and holidays, except when such work complies with the terms of a temporary use permit which may be issued by the community development director or his or her designee, upon a showing of sufficient need due to hot or inclement weather, or the use of an unusually long process material, or other circumstances of unusual and compelling nature. All construction equipment shall be muffled and/or surrounded by noise attenuating barriers. ☐ Ongoing Planning 121) Mitigation Measure BIO-4. MSHCP Construction Minimization Measures. The Project Applicant and their designee (i.e., Construction Contractors) shall follow required MSHCP Construction Minimization Measures (Section 7.5.3 of the MSHCP). Applicable construction minimization measures are listed below. Plans for water pollution and erosion control will be prepared for all Discretionary Projects involving the movement of earth in excess of 50 cubic yards. The plans will describe sediment and hazardous materials control, dewatering or diversion structures, fueling and equipment management practices, use of plant material for erosion control. Plans will be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. Timing of construction activities will consider seasonal requirements for breeding birds and migratory non-resident species. Habitat ☐ General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval Page 59 of 59 Timing Responsible Department Operational Met? clearing will be avoided during species active breeding season defined as March 1 to June 30. Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented until such time soils are determined to be successfully stabilized. March 24, 2026 TO: Planning Commission REQUESTED BY: Travis Randel, Deputy City Manager, Development Services APPROVED BY: Robert A. Johnson, City Manager SUBJECT: Chacon Farms (PROJ23-0029) RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission Adopt PC Resolution No. 26-01, thereby recommending that the City Council: 1. DETERMINE that the proposed Project will not have a significant effect on the environment with the incorporation of mitigation based on the findings set forth in the case record and ADOPT a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and 2. APPROVE the General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Very Low Density Residential (VLDR) to Low Density Residential LDR); 3. APPROVE the Change of Zone from Rural Residential (RR) to Residential Low Density; 4. APPROVE the Chacon Farms Planned Development Permit; and 5. APPROVE Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 39076 to subdivide 73.97-net acres, into 419 single-family lots for the ultimate construction of 419 single-family detached residences, and to create lettered lots for onsite roadways, a detention basin, parks, and on-site landscape subject to the Recommended Conditions of Approval (PROJ23-0029). DISCUSSION: The project is a proposal by Taylor and Clark Consulting on behalf of Richard Michael and Ramona Dairy, LLC, to establish a master-planned residential development consisting of 419 homes as well as the construction of onsite roadways, a detention basin, parks, and on-site landscaping on 73.97-net acres. To facilitate the development, the applicant submitted a General Plan Amendment (GPA), Change of Zone (CZ), Tentative Tract Map (TTM) and Planned Development Permit (PDP), for review and approval. Because the GPA, CZ, and PDP require City Council approval, the Planning Commission is being asked to provide a recommendation to the City Council. 5.1 Packet Pg. 9 The Project site is located west of Cawston Avenue, extending between Seventh Street and Esplanade Avenue. The project site is currently occupied by Chacon Farms and Bruno Ranches agricultural operations. Two single-family residential uses occupied by caretakers are also located on site. The project site is surrounded by residential uses to the north and east, residential and agricultural uses to the west, and a dairy farm to the south. The General Plan Land Use Designation is Very Low Density Residential, and the current Zone is Rural Residential. Land Use General Plan Designation Current Zoning Project RR – Rural Residential North Residential LDR – RL – Residential, Low South Dairy Farm – A-2 – Heavy Agriculture City of Hemet) East Residential VLDR – Very Residential RR–Rural Residential West Residential/Vacant Specific Plan Specific Plan ANALYSIS: The intent of the Very Low Density Residential (VLDR) General Plan Land Use Designation and Rural Residential (RR) Zone is to provide for the development of single-family dwellings at a density of up to 2 dwelling units per gross acre of land. This designation is generally most suitable in rural areas, locations where scenic and natural resources should be protected, in areas that consist of small agricultural operations, or where natural hazards limit development potential such as hillsides). With a maximum density of 2 units per acre the property would be allowed to develop 158 units. However, the developer desires to create a product with smaller lots and more units than would be allowed in the existing designations and therefore a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change are proposed General Plan and Change of Zone The project proposes to change the General Plan Land Use Designation to Low Density Residential (LDR) and the Zone to Residential, Low Density (RL). Like the VLDR and RR designations, the proposed land use and zone provide for the development of detached single- family dwellings, however the LDR and RL designations would allow the property to be developed at a higher density with a range between 2 and 7 dwelling units per gross acre and thus allow more units. 5.1 Packet Pg. 10 As noted in the table above, the area directly north of the project site is designated LDR and RL and have been developed with single family homes above 2 units to the acre. Furthermore, the area directly west of the site is governed by the Esplanade Specific Plan, which allows a maximum density of 4.5 units to the acre. Development within the Specific Plan is currently underway with densities also above 2 units per acre. Given the development patterns that exists north and west of the project site, the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change provide for a logical and orderly development pattern, with the extension of single-family residences at a higher density consistent with the LDR and RL designations. Tentative Tract Map The project proposes to subdivide 3 parcels into single family lots. Therefore, the project includes TTM 39076 to create 419 single-family lots with a density of 5.53 dwelling units per acre. The subdivision is proposed to be recorded in two phases which will include 235 lots in Phase 1 and 184 lots in Phase 2. The proposed lots range in size between 3,700 to 7,900 square feet. In addition, the subdivision includes lettered lots for the construction of onsite roadways, detention basins, parks, and on-site landscaping. Access and Circulation Two points of vehicular access will be provided to the development, which includes a single new 80-foot-wide (40’ curb to curb) east-west oriented roadway from Cawston Avenue, which borders the development to the east, and a new 56-foot-wide (36’ curb to curb) north-south oriented roadway that connects to Seventh Street which borders the project to the north. These two proposed entrance roadways lead to a network of 52-foot-wide (36’ curb to curb) internal streets within the tract that ensure appropriate access to every facet of the development, including all homes, parks and basins. The new roads will be private streets that include curb, gutter, sidewalks and streetlights. Because the roads are proposed as private streets, they will be maintained by a Homeowners Association (HOA). Pedestrian access is also provided via proposed sidewalks on both sides of the new streets mentioned above as well as a new pedestrian entrance from Esplanade Avenue through a proposed paseo. In addition to internal streets the developer will also be conditioned to improve Cawston Avenue and Seventh Street, which are adjacent to the site. For Cawston Avenue and Seventh Street the developer will be required to dedicate 20 feet of right-of-way and widen the existing roadway with additional asphalt paving. In addition, the project will be conditioned to install curb, gutter, sidewalk, streetlights and 18 feet of parkway with landscaping. Frontage improvements along Esplanade Avenue, which borders the project site to the south, will be constructed as part of the City’s adopted Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which includes the widening of Esplanade Avenue from Warren Road to Sanderson Avenue. Accordingly, the Developer will not be required to construct the roadway frontage improvements along Esplanade. 5.1 Packet Pg. 11 This approach is consistent with the City’s long-standing plan to deliver these improvements as a single coordinated CIP project and avoids the inefficiencies and potential conflicts associated with having multiple contractors operating within the same right-of-way at the same time. While the roadway widening is primarily funded through the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program, TUMF funding is limited to capacity-related improvements and does not include street lighting. As such, the Developer remains responsible for the installation of streetlights along the project frontage. To ensure compatibility with the City’s ongoing construction, the Developer shall coordinate with the City and its contractor to incorporate the necessary provisions into the CIP project to allow for the future installation of streetlights and related improvements without requiring disturbance of the newly constructed roadway. The Developer shall also coordinate with the City regarding frontage landscaping. To ensure that intersections will operate at acceptable levels with the additional traffic created, traffic signals will be required at the intersection of Cawston Avenue and Esplanade Avenue, Cawston Avenue and Seventh Street, and Cawston Avenue and Cottonwood Avenue. However, the intersection at Cawston and Esplanade will be completed as part of the CIP project and therefore it is not a required condition of approval. Along with the installation of these traffic signals, additional signing and stripping improvements to accommodate vehicular travel lanes and pedestrian crossings will be required. Planned Development Permit (PDP) To support the ultimate development of the proposed subdivision, the applicant has submitted a Planned Development Permit (PDP). The purpose of the PDP is to promote the efficient use of land, ensure a high-quality residential environment, uphold strong environmental design standards, and provide enhanced amenities that contribute to the creation of a well-planned community. In addition to the proposed single-family homes, Chacon Farms also includes four active parks and amenities that will feature pickle ball courts, shade structures, picnic tables, BBQs, and multiple play structures. The project also includes a network of new street improvements as well as utilities, and drainage infrastructure to serve the development. The PDP establishes the design and minimum development standards for the future buildout of Chacon Farms. The proposed residential units would include 4 to 5 bedrooms, 2 to 4 bathrooms, and optional loft spaces available within specific floor plans. The homes would range in size from approximately 1,758 to 3,025 square feet, providing a variety of housing options capable of meeting the needs of different household types and lifestyles. All homes would include two-car garages as well as driveways designed to accommodate an additional two vehicles, ensuring adequate on-site parking. To further reduce parking impacts within the neighborhood, the internal street system has been designed to allow on-street parking on one side, thereby providing convenient and accessible guest parking while maintaining clear travel lanes and emergency access. 5.1 Packet Pg. 12 The Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) provides comprehensive guidelines for architectural design, color schemes, and materials intended to establish a cohesive, rural-inspired character. For the purposes of this PDP, an agrarian architecture theme is achieved through simple building forms, varied one- and two-story massing, pitched rooflines, and the use of natural materials such as muted stucco and stone veneer, complemented by architectural details including siding, shutters, and covered entries typical of farmhouse-style development. The guidelines address architectural styles, color palettes, exterior materials, and elevations treatments. The architectural styles include Spanish, Prairie, and Farmhouse for the future 419 dwelling units, accompanied by nine (9) color schemes. The incorporation of multiple styles and color options is intended to enhance visual interest while maintaining a unified aesthetic throughout the subdivision. In addition, the PDP proposes five (5) distinct floor plans, each offering five (5) elevation types. This range of design options ensures that homes will not appear repetitive and ensures identical or highly similar elevations being placed adjacent to or directly across from one another. The added variety and enhanced architectural features and variation of product types provided within the Chacon Farms development will ensure that the development is cohesive and unique while providing greater architectural interest throughout the development. In addition to the 419 lots, the proposed PDP includes one basin/park located at the northwest corner of the community, a central park located at the center of the community, two smaller neighborhood parks located to the south, and paseos throughout the site totaling approximately 3.26-acres. All parks, roadways, and basins will be maintained by the HOA. The following is a complete list of amenities within the park areas: A. Basin Park x Shade Structure with Picnic Tables (six tables) x Seating area with Picking Tables (five locations) x Benches x Turf / Open Space x Pickleball Court x Playground B. Central Park x Two Shade Structures with Picnic Tables (two tables each) x Playground / Tot lot x Turf / Open Space C. West Neighborhood Park x Shade Structures with Picnic Tables (two tables) x Barbeque area x Turf / Open Space 5.1 Packet Pg. 13 D. East Neighborhood Park x Shade Structure with Picnic Tables (two tables) x Barbeque area x Turf / Open Space Lastly, the Planned Development includes landscape design guidelines and wall standards that provide additional details that enhance the project. Those details include enhanced entrances with accent trees, outdoor play equipment, stone veneer pilasters at corners, split face block walls with decorative caps that will be enhanced with vines and landscaping with an expansive list of Street Trees and shrubs to provide additional variety and interest. Development Schedule and Phasing Plan Construction activities for the Project would occur over four construction phases lasting approximately 5 years, with final engineering completed in 2026 and final closing in 2031. Construction would occur as follows: (1) final engineering; (2) grading and site preparation; (3) home construction; (4) final closing. Construction activities would be limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekdays and Saturdays, and between 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Sundays and holidays pursuant to the City’s Municipal Code Chapter 8.40.090. The proposed product types, enhanced architectural standards, and park provides for a better living environment with higher standards found in conventional developments. Modified Designed Standards To meet the project objectives that provide for this future development, the PDP proposes to modify several development standards of the Residential, Low Density (RL) zone. The table below identifies the RL Development Standards and the proposed Development Standards of the PDP. Items that are underlined are standards that would be modified. Development Feature RL Zone Development Code Proposed Proposed Modification Density Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 5.1 Packet Pg. 14 The proposed Planned Development Permit (PDP) includes modifications to certain development standards of the Residential, Low Density (RL) zone to facilitate a cohesive and efficient site design. These modifications primarily include reductions in minimum lot size, lot dimensions, and setbacks, along with a modest increase in allowable lot coverage. The resulting project achieves a density of 5.53 dwelling units per acre, which remains within the permitted range of the Low Density Residential (LDR) designation (2.1 to 7.0 dwelling units per acre). The proposed modifications are consistent with the intent of the General Plan and reflect development patterns in the surrounding area, including nearby neighborhoods to the north and west that have been developed at similar densities and with comparable lot configurations. As such, the project does not introduce an intensity or scale that would be incompatible with adjacent uses and represents a logical continuation of existing residential development in the vicinity. In addition to consistency with surrounding development, the PDP incorporates objective design standards and site planning features that ensure a high-quality residential environment. The project includes a typical plotting plan demonstrating that functional single-family homes can be constructed on the proposed lots in compliance with applicable building and fire code requirements, confirming that the modified standards result in practical and buildable lot configurations. The PDP further enhances the quality of the development through a range of site design features and amenities, including: A dual park and basin feature that provides both recreational space and functional stormwater infrastructure; Play equipment and design elements that reflect the agricultural character of the surrounding area; A coordinated landscape palette that complements the architectural styles and enhances neighborhood identity; Decorative perimeter walls with stone veneer pilasters, enhanced with landscaping and vines; A tubular steel fence with split-face block pilasters at the water quality basin; An enhanced entry feature along Cawston Avenue with accent landscaping and 24-inch box trees; A paseo connection to Esplanade Avenue providing pedestrian access to and from the community; Yes Yes Yes Yes Primary Structure Height 5.1 Packet Pg. 15 Architectural design standards that exceed minimum Development Code requirements, including five floor plans with multiple elevation types and varied materials such as siding, brick and stone veneer, clay tile elements, and enhanced window treatments. Collectively, these features demonstrate that the requested modifications are balanced by a comprehensive and thoughtfully designed project. The flexibility provided through the Planned Development Permit results in a development that is both consistent with applicable land use policies and superior in overall design quality, consistent with the purpose and intent of the PDP process. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The project has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA”) and the State CEQA guidelines. An Initial Study was prepared for the project to determine the potential environmental impacts of the project. The Initial Study concluded that with applied mitigation the Project would not result in a significant effect on the environment. The project includes mitigation measures related to Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Noise, and Tribal Cultural Resources. Therefore, staff determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was the appropriate CEQA document in support of the Project. The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was circulated for a 30-day public comment period via the publication of a Notice of Intent on October 28, 2025. In addition to the publication, the IS/MND was submitted to the State Clearing House for posting (SCH No. 2025101241). Three comments were received. Department of Toxic Substances (DTSC) The first comment letter was issued by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), outlining DTSC’s recommendations regarding potential contaminants of concern (COCs). As part of the MND a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was prepared, which did not identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs) requiring immediate subsurface investigation. Additional soil sampling was also conducted, and no pesticides or heavy metals were detected in the shallow soil samples. Department of Conservation The second letter was issued by the Department of Conservation, providing advisory comments regarding the project’s potential conversion of Important Farmland. This concern was evaluated in the Agriculture and Forestry Resources as part of the City General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The agricultural resource impacts associated with converting Important Farmland within the Planning Area, including the infeasibility of preservation-based mitigation, were fully evaluated and disclosed in the General Plan 2040 EIR. 5.1 Packet Pg. 16 The proposed project does not introduce new agricultural impacts or increase the severity of those identified in the certified EIR. In addition, to evaluate site-specific agricultural viability, a California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) Model analysis was conducted. The LESA Model, developed by the California Department of Conservation (DOC), is an optional quantitative tool available to lead agencies under CEQA for determining the significance of farmland conversion. While the project converts existing agricultural land, these impacts were fully analyzed in the General Plan EIR and are not new or more severe than previously disclosed. Talley Meadows Ranch The third and final comment letter was submitted by Talley Meadows Ranch, outlining concerns about traffic safety and pedestrian hazards on Cawston Avenue along the project frontage. These concerns have been acknowledged; however, the comments do not identify deficiencies in the adequacy of the CEQA document. Issues related to the safety and functional design of the street frontage will be addressed through the Tentative Tract Map No. 39076 engineering review and approval process, which ensures that all frontage improvements and design details comply with the City’s requirements and standards. The mitigation measures required to reduce or mitigate the impacts of this Project on the environment are included in the Initial Study and will be made enforceable through the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (“MMRP”) and the Conditions of Approval for the Project. Notice of Public Hearing The public hearing for this Project was originally noticed on or before January 17, 2026, for a January 27, 2026, hearing, including mailed notice to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. The January 27, 2026, hearing was subsequently adjourned, and all items were continued to February 24, 2026. On February 19, 2026, the applicant requested a continuance to the March 24, 2026, meeting to allow time to address outstanding items related to the conditions of approval. Out of an abundance of caution, the Project was re-noticed on or before March 13, 20`26, for the March 24, 2026 hearing, including mailed notice to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. As of the preparation of this report, no additional correspondence or comments have been received. 5.1 Packet Pg. 17 CONCLUSION The proposed General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone establish a land use framework that is internally consistent with the General Plan and supports the orderly development of the project site. As outlined in the Findings of Fact, the project furthers multiple General Plan goals and policies related to housing, land use compatibility, circulation, and community design, while contributing to the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) and providing a range of housing opportunities. The proposed Tentative Tract Map and Planned Development Permit implement this framework through a cohesive subdivision design, appropriate infrastructure and circulation improvements, and a comprehensive set of architectural standards and site enhancements. The requested modifications to development standards are consistent with the intent of the Planned Development Permit process and are balanced by high-quality design features, integrated open space, and neighborhood amenities that ensure compatibility with surrounding uses and the creation of a well-planned residential community. As further supported by the Findings, the site is physically suitable for the proposed development, and adequate public services and infrastructure are available or will be provided to serve the project. Additionally, to ensure consistency with development standards and enhance the overall project design, the applicant will be required to submit a revised plot plan prior to City Council clearly illustrating all required setbacks as measured from the property lines, including a minimum setback of no less than twenty (20) feet from the property line to the garage. The applicant will also identify any rear elevations that face the public right-of-way and demonstrate how those elevations will be architecturally enhanced to maintain visual quality and compatibility with the surrounding area. The environmental analysis prepared for the project determined that, with incorporation of mitigation measures, all potential impacts can be reduced to a less-than-significant level. Adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program will ensure that these measures are implemented. Based on the foregoing and the detailed Findings of Fact attached, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council: (1) adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program pursuant to CEQA; and (2) approve the General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map No. 39076, subject to the Conditions of Approval. As the General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, and Planned Development Permit require City Council approval, the Planning Commission’s action on this item is a recommendation only. Final action on the Project will be taken by the City Council. The Planning Commission’s recommendation is subject to appeal in accordance with Chapter 17.715 (Appeals) of the Development Code. 5.1 Packet Pg. 18 ATTACHMENTS: PC Resolution 26-01 Findings of Facts Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract Map 39076 Planned Development Permit Location Map General Plan Zoning Map Mitigated Negative Declaration Appendix A-1 Air Quality, GHG, Energy Appendix A-2 Health Risk Assessment Appendix B-1 Habitat Assessment Appendix B-2 Tree Survey Appendix C - Phase I Archaeo-Paleo Inventory Appendix D-1 - Geotechnical Report Appendix D-2 Updated Geotechnical Report Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA Appendix F-1 - Preliminary Hydrology Study Appendix F-2 Preliminary WQMP Appendix G - Noise Study Appendix H - Traffic Trip Generation Study 5.1 Packet Pg. 19 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) PC RESOLUTION NO. 26-01 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF SAN JACINTO) A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND APPROVE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, CHANGE OF ZONE, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 39076 (PROJ23-0029) WHEREAS, the applicant, Chacon Farms, submitted applications for a General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map 39076 to subdivide approximately 73.97 net acres into 419 single-family residential lots, along with lettered lots for internal roadways, a detention basin, parks, and landscape areas, located between 7th Street to the north, Esplanade Avenue to the south, and west of Cawston Avenue (Project); and WHEREAS, the City, as Lead Agency, prepared an Initial Study in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined that, with the incorporation of mitigation measures, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) were prepared for the Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, together with all comments received thereon, and finds that the MND reflects the independent judgment of the City; and WHEREAS, on March 24, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project, at which time all interested persons were given the opportunity to be heard and the Project was fully considered; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the entire record of proceedings, including the staff report, technical studies, public testimony, and all other evidence presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference. 5.1.a Packet Pg. 20 At t a c h m e n t P C R e s o l u t i o n 2 6 0 1 C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Section 2. Environmental Determination. Based upon the whole of the record before it, including the Initial Study and all supporting information, the Planning Commission finds that: A. The Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); B. The Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the City; C. There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record, that the Project, as mitigated, will have a significant effect on the environment; and D. The mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration are hereby adopted and shall be implemented through the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Section 3. Findings. Based upon the entire record, including all written and oral evidence presented, and the findings set forth in the staff report and incorporated herein by reference, the Planning Commission finds that: A. The Project is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable provisions of the Municipal Code; B. The Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the Subdivision Map Act and the City’s Development Code, and the site is physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed; C. The Project satisfies all applicable findings required for approval of the General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Planned Development Permit, and Tentative Tract Map; and D. The Project will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. Section 4. Recommendation of Approval. Based upon the foregoing, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council: A. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project and adopt and implement the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; B. Approve a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Very Low Density Residential (VLDR) to Low Density Residential (LDR); C. Approve a Change of Zone from Rural Residential (RR) to Residential Low Density (RL); D. Approve a Planned Development Permit to allow modifications to the Residential Low Density (RL) development standards, subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference; 5.1.a Packet Pg. 21 At t a c h m e n t P C R e s o l u t i o n 2 6 0 1 C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 E. Approve Tentative Tract Map No. 39076 to subdivide approximately 73.97 net acres into 419 single-family residential lots and associated lettered lots for roadways, drainage, parks, and landscape areas, subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference; and, F. Direct staff to file a Notice of Determination in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 5. Record of proceedings. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this Resolution is based are located at the City of San Jacinto, 595 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 92583. The custodian of the record is the Community Development Department. This information is provided pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. Section 6. Recommendation to city council. As the Project includes a General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, and Planned Development Permit, final action on the Project rests with the City Council. The Planning Commission’s action on this item constitutes a recommendation to the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on the 24th day of March 2026 by the following vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CITY OF SAN JACINTO: Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: Planning Commission Secretary 5.1.a Packet Pg. 22 At t a c h m e n t P C R e s o l u t i o n 2 6 0 1 C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 FINDINGS OF FACTS Chacon Farms Residential Development GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FINDINGS: 1. The amendment is internally consistent with all other provisions of the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; The proposed General Plan Amendment from VLDR (Very Low Density Residential) to LDR (Low Density Residential) will further the intent of the General Plan by providing a variety of new housing opportunities that will complement surrounding uses of primarily residential developments. Specifically the General Plan Amendment will continue to allow the development of residences on the project site with a density range of 2.1 to 7 dwelling units to the acre in lieu of the current density range of 0-2 dwelling units to the acre with the VLDR designation. With proposed General Plan Amendment, the proposed project will conform with the goals and policies of the General Plan, including the applicable goals and policies of the Land Use Element and Housing Element, as detailed below: Land Use Goal 1: A community with a land use plan that accommodates a mix of uses to meet current and future needs. Specifically implementing policy 1.3 & 1.6 x The Project supports Policy LU-1.3 by increasing the City’s housing supply within an established growth area and contributing toward the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). The Project includes 419 single-family residential units within the allowable density range of the Low Density Residential designation, helping to meet current and future housing needs. x The Project is consistent with Policy LU-1.6 through the incorporation of multiple neighborhood parks, open space areas, and an interconnected system of pedestrian paseos. These features provide accessible recreational opportunities and functional gathering spaces for future residents. Land Use Goal 2: A City that manages and directs growth so that the community and its neighborhoods are protected and enhanced. Specifically implementing policy 2.1 & 2.2 x The Project supports Policies LU-2.1 and LU-2.2 by promoting an orderly and coordinated pattern of development that is compatible with surrounding residential uses. The Project site is adjacent to existing and 5.1.b Packet Pg. 23 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 planned residential neighborhoods and proposes a density that is consistent with the Low Density Residential designation. x The Project includes an interconnected circulation network designed to improve internal connectivity, provide efficient vehicular and pedestrian access, and enhance access to on-site open space and neighborhood amenities. The Project also provides connectivity to the Class I multi- use path along Esplanade Avenue, supporting multimodal access. x The Project provides a balanced distribution of open space and recreational amenities throughout the site, ensuring that residents have convenient access to neighborhood parks and contributing to the overall quality and livability of the community. The Project has been reviewed for consistency with applicable infrastructure and service requirements and will coordinate with appropriate service providers, including Eastern Municipal Water District, to ensure adequate utilities and public services are provided. Based on the foregoing, the proposed General Plan Amendment is internally consistent with the goals, policies, and land use framework of the General Plan and will not create inconsistencies with other provisions of the Plan. 2. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; Public Interest The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and serves the public interest by providing a balanced mix of housing and amenities that meet community needs and enhance recreational and social opportunities. The project would contribute 419 residential units toward the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), offering a variety of housing types to accommodate diverse ages, incomes, and household needs. The homes are designed with architectural styles that complement the area’s rural character. Overall, the development promotes livability through walkability, community engagement, integrated open space, pedestrian safety, and support for an active lifestyle. Health and Safety The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and promotes public health and safety by incorporating a planned layout that emphasizes pedestrian safety and encourages physical activity and well-being. Four community parks, connected by an integrated network of pathways, will provide residents with a range of social and recreational opportunities. 5.1.b Packet Pg. 24 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Convenience The proposed project conforms with the provision of public convenience according to the General Plan. This development will create an additional 419 homes that are within a convenient distance to surrounding amenities and public infrastructure, including the following: x Transit The Project Site is approximately 0.6 miles (a 12-minute walk), from the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) Go Micro service zone. Go Micro is RTA’s on-demand public transit service available within the Hemet-San Jacinto micro transit zone. Shared rides can be booked via the Go Micro app at user convenience, rather than relying on a predetermined bus schedule. Go Micro minibuses directly pick up and drop off passengers at desired locations, at desired times provided both locations are within the micro transit zone and that the trip does not begin and end at route 44 bus stops). x Schools The Project Site is located within the Hemet Unified School District and would likely be served by nearby schools, including Cawston Elementary School (1.3 miles), Rancho Viejo Middle School (0.9 miles), and Tahquitz High School (0.7 miles). The site may also be served by Megan Cope Elementary School (0.7 miles), which is within the San Jacinto Unified School District. In addition, Mt. San Jacinto College is approximately five miles from the Project Site and is directly accessible via RTA’s on-demand transit service, Go Micro. Welfare The proposed project with the support of the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment, will support and promote the general welfare of San Jacinto residents. The proposed project, specifically, will support and promote walkability, community engagement, integrated open space, pedestrian safety, and an active lifestyle. Integrated Community Parks connected by a network of paths will facilitate recreation and socialization. 3. If an amendment to the Land Use Element, the affected site(s) is physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size, operating characteristics, and the provision of public and emergency vehicle e.g., fire and medical) access and public services and utilities (e.g., fire protection, police protection, potable water, schools, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.), to ensure that the proposed or anticipated uses and/or development will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the property or improvements in the vicinity in which the property is located; and 5.1.b Packet Pg. 25 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Physical Suitability The proposed project, with the support of the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment, will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute hazard to property in the vicinity in which the property is located and will be physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size, operating characteristics, and the provision of public emergency vehicle access and public services as follows: x Design The Proposed Project is designed to be compatible with the surrounding San Jacinto community and consistent with adjacent residential uses. The development features an interconnected grid of streets that enhances walkability and provides convenient vehicle and pedestrian access to homes, community parks, and recreational amenities distributed throughout the site. Residential architecture will include farmhouse, Spanish, and prairie styles, using quality materials such as stucco, brick, and stone, along with a varied but cohesive color palette that complements the broader community and individual streetscapes. These design elements enhance the visual character of the Chacon Farms community. The project will not interfere with existing water or sewer easements, as confirmed by the site boundary survey, and will comply with applicable landscaping and setback requirements. The site’s north– south orientation supports efficient solar design, with some east– west–oriented homes incorporated where feasible to allow for additional passive solar opportunities. x Location The proposed development will complement and enhance surrounding land uses. Existing single-family residential neighborhoods are located to the north, northeast, and northwest across West 7th Street, as well as to the east across Cawston Avenue. To the west, the Esplanade Specific Plan includes approximately 130.7 acres of planned single-family residential development. x Shape and Size The project site is generally rectangular in configuration and consists of three smaller rectangular parcels. The proposed project is designed to minimize sprawl and efficiently utilize the approximately 75.70 acres of site area. The site will accommodate 419 single- family homes with a minimum lot size of 3,717 square feet, along with designated open space for parks and a basin. 5.1.b Packet Pg. 26 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 x Operating Characteristics The proposed projects operating characteristics will be consistent with those of surrounding single-family developments. The proposed project will operate as a place of housing, enhanced by various amenities within several community parks, to prospective residents. x Public Emergency Vehicle Access The proposed project’s inter-connected network of thoroughfares will contribute to emergency vehicle accessibility. The applicant will comply with any easement requirements for public emergency vehicle access. Further, the proposed public emergency vehicle access will be reviewed by City and County Departments including the City’s engineering department and Riverside County Fire, to ensure efficiency and safety for future residents. x Public Service and Utilities Adequate City infrastructure exists to support the Project. Additionally, the project has been reviewed by Police, Fire, Public Utilities and Engineering to ensure that the design accommodates public and emergency vehicles including solid waste haulers, City crews, and other service providers. 4. The City may reduce, require, or permit the reduction of, the residential density for any parcel to, or allow development of any parcel at, a lower residential density, as defined in Government Code Section 65863, only if the following two additional findings are first made: a. The reduction is consistent with the adopted General Plan, including the Housing Element; and The proposed Project does not involve a reduction in residential density. The proposed General Plan Amendment would change the land use designation from Very Low Density Residential (0 to 2 dwelling units per acre) to Low Density Residential (2.1 to 7 dwelling units per acre), thereby allowing for an increase in residential density on the Project site. Accordingly, this finding is not applicable. Notwithstanding, the Project is consistent with the General Plan and Housing Element. b. The remaining sites identified in the Housing Element are adequate to accommodate the jurisdiction's share of the regional housing needs in compliance with Government Code Section 65584. The proposed Project does not reduce residential density and 5.1.b Packet Pg. 27 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 therefore does not trigger this finding. Notwithstanding, the Housing Element identifies adequate sites to accommodate the City’s remaining Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), and the Project would increase the City’s housing supply and contribute toward meeting its RHNA obligations. 5.1.b Packet Pg. 28 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 CHANGE OF ZONE FINDINGS: 1. Findings required for all Development Code and Zoning Map amendments. a. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; The proposed Change of Zone from Rural Residential (RR) to Residential Low Density (RL) is consistent with the General Plan with the adoption of the proposed General Plan Amendment. The RL zoning designation is the implementing zone for the Low Density Residential LDR) General Plan land use designation and will ensure consistency between the General Plan and Zoning Map. The Project site is not located within a Specific Plan area; therefore, no Specific Plan applies. b. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. The proposed Change of Zone will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. The amendment will facilitate the development of a planned residential community that is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The Project incorporates an interconnected circulation system, neighborhood parks, and pedestrian amenities that promote walkability and community interaction. The Project has been reviewed by applicable City departments and service providers to ensure that adequate infrastructure and public services, including police, fire, utilities, and emergency access, are available to serve the site. As conditioned, the Project will not result in adverse impacts to the surrounding area and will support orderly and coordinated development. 2. Additional findings for Zoning Map amendments a. The affected site(s) is physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size, operating characteristics, and the provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access and public services and utilities (e.g., fire protection, police protection, potable water, schools, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.), to ensure that the requested zoning designation and the proposed or anticipated uses and/or development will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the property or improvements in the vicinity in which the property is located. The Project site is physically suitable for the proposed Residential Low 5.1.b Packet Pg. 29 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Density (RL) zoning designation in terms of design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics. The site is of sufficient size and configuration to accommodate the proposed residential development, including internal circulation, open space, and required infrastructure. The Project is located adjacent to existing and planned residential development and represents a logical extension of the surrounding land use pattern. The proposed street network is designed to provide adequate access for residents, service providers, and emergency response vehicles and will be subject to review and approval by the City’s Engineering Department and Riverside County Fire Department. Adequate public services and utilities are available, or will be provided, to serve the Project, including potable water, wastewater, storm drainage, solid waste services, and schools. The Project has been reviewed by relevant agencies and departments to ensure that the proposed zoning and anticipated development will not endanger or otherwise constitute a hazard to surrounding properties or improvements. 5.1.b Packet Pg. 30 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 SUBDIVISION FINDINGS (TTM 39076): 1. The proposed subdivision of land has been found to be consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, and the San Jacinto Municipal Code. The proposed Tentative Tract Map (TTM 39076) is consistent with the San Jacinto Municipal Code and has been reviewed in accordance with the applicable provisions of Titles 16 and 17. The Project includes a Planned Development Permit to allow limited, controlled modifications to the development standards of the Residential Low Density (RL) zone, which are intended to facilitate a cohesive and well-designed residential community. Upon approval of the General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone, the Project will be consistent with the Low Density Residential (LDR) General Plan land use designation and the corresponding RL zoning designation. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the permitted density range and establishes a logical and orderly pattern of residential development. The Project implements applicable General Plan goals and policies, including: Land Use Goal 2 and Policies LU-2.1 and LU-2.2, by promoting orderly and coordinated growth that is compatible with surrounding residential neighborhoods and supported by an interconnected circulation network and accessible open space; and Land Use Goal 3 and Policies LU-3.1 and LU-3.2, by facilitating high- quality residential development that is compatible with adjacent land uses and incorporates design features that enhance neighborhood character and connectivity. Based on the foregoing, the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, and Municipal Code. 2. The tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will be of an adequate size to sustain their agricultural use The project site is not subject to a contract pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965 as detailed in the analysis completed through the Mitigated Negative Declaration document. In addition, the projects title report did not have indication of a Williamson Act Contract. 5.1.b Packet Pg. 31 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 3. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative map. The Project site is physically suitable for the proposed subdivision of 419 single-family residential lots. The proposed use is consistent with the Residential Low Density (RL) zoning designation and the Low Density Residential (LDR) General Plan land use designation, which permits residential development within the proposed density range. The site is of sufficient size and configuration to accommodate the proposed subdivision, including residential lots, internal circulation, and open space areas. The Project represents a logical expansion of existing and planned residential development in the surrounding area, including neighborhoods to the north, east, and west. The Project site has access to existing and planned infrastructure necessary to support the proposed development, including potable water, wastewater, natural gas, and electrical services, which are available within adjacent roadways. The site is also located in proximity to existing community amenities, including parks and schools, which support the residential character of the Project. Based on the foregoing, the site is physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed. 4. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval, are either: a. Not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; or An Initial Study was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to evaluate potential environmental impacts. The Initial Study determined that, with the incorporation of mitigation measures, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment, including impacts to biological resources such as fish and wildlife and their habitat. All mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study have been incorporated into the Project and will be implemented through the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Accordingly, the design of the subdivision and proposed improvements is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 5.1.b Packet Pg. 32 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 b. An environmental impact report under which a finding has been made pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3) that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. The project’s impacts were not significant enough to require the preparation of an environmental impact report. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the Project to assess any significant environmental impacts, and it was determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate level of environmental document. Therefore, findings pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3) are not necessary. 5. The design of the subdivision of land and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The implementation of the proposed conditions will ensure that the Project will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City or the future residents of the development. As previously mentioned, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the proposed subdivision, which analyzed items that can cause public health problems such as Air Quality, Hazardous Materials, and Utilities. It was determined through the environmental document that with incorporation of mitigation measures, the impacts to public health problems would be less than significant 6. That design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision will provide for future passive cooling opportunities with the implementation of building setbacks, lot coverage requirements, landscaping requirements, including required street trees, and open space areas. This can also include configuration to permit orientation of a structure to take advantage of shade and prevailing breezes. Furthermore, natural heating opportunities can be provided with orientation of a structure in an east-west alignment for southern exposure. The proposed project is a subdivision and Planned Development Permit, subsequent development will be analyzed and conditioned through a Site Plan and Design Review. As part of the Site Plan and Design Review process, the Planning Department will ensure that natural heating and cooling opportunities are explored to the extent feasible and condition the project accordingly. 5.1.b Packet Pg. 33 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. Per the title report provided by the project applicant, the site consists of two easements for a right-of-way over a strip of land 30 feet wide located outside the property line on Cawston Avenue. The second easement is granted to Easter Municipal Water District for sewage transmission and collection facilities. This easement is located outside the property lines along Cawston Avenue. These two easements are shown in the Tentative Tract Map and will not conflict with the development of the proposed Project. 8. The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (per the Quimby Act), as applicable, in accordance with Chapter 16.75 (Parkland Dedication and Fees). The proposed subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements pursuant to Chapter 16.75 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code. The Project provides approximately 3.26 acres of usable parkland within designated park lots, which contributes toward satisfying the City’s parkland dedication requirement. Any remaining parkland obligation will be satisfied through the payment of in-lieu fees, in accordance with Chapter 16.75, as required by the Conditions of Approval. Based on the foregoing, the Project complies with the City’s parkland dedication requirements.. 5.1.b Packet Pg. 34 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FINDINGS: 1. The Planned Development Permit will: a. Be allowed within the subject base zone; The Project includes a Change of Zone to the Residential Low Density (RL) zone. The RL zone is intended to accommodate detached single-family residential development, along with accessory uses and other compatible uses, at a density range of 2.1 to 7.0 dwelling units per acre. The Planned Development Permit is an allowed entitlement within the RL zone and is intended to provide flexibility from standard development requirements in order to achieve superior site design and community planning. Accordingly, the Planned Development Permit is permitted within the proposed base zone.. b. Be consistent with the purpose, intent, goals, policies, actions, and land use designations of the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; The Project site is proposed to be designated Low Density Residential (LDR) under the General Plan, which permits detached single-family residential development at a density of 2.1 to 7.0 dwelling units per acre. The Project proposes a density of 5.53 dwelling units per acre, which is within the allowable range and consistent with the intended use of the LDR designation. The Project site is not located within a Specific Plan area. The Project is consistent with the purpose and intent of the General Plan by facilitating a well-planned residential community that balances efficient land use with neighborhood compatibility and access to amenities. The Planned Development Permit allows for modifications to development standards that support a cohesive site design while maintaining consistency with the overall density and character envisioned by the General Plan. The Project implements applicable General Plan goals and policies, including: Land Use Policy LU-1.6, by incorporating an integrated system of open space and recreational amenities, including multiple parks, paseos, and gathering areas that support community interaction and outdoor activity; Land Use Policy LU-4.4, by promoting pedestrian-oriented design through internal walkways, paseo connections, and 5.1.b Packet Pg. 35 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 access to the Class I multi-use trail along Esplanade Avenue; and Land Use Policy LU-5.4, by providing well-designed, multi- functional open spaces, including neighborhood parks and a basin park, that serve a variety of recreational and community needs. Based on the foregoing, the Planned Development Permit is consistent with the purpose, intent, goals, policies, and land use designations of the General Plan. c. Be generally in compliance with all of the applicable provisions of this Development Code relating to both on-site and off-site improvements that are necessary to accommodate flexibility in site planning and property development and to carry out the purpose, intent, and requirements of this Chapter and the subject base zone, including prescribed development standards and applicable design guidelines, except for those provisions modified in compliance with this Chapter. The Project is compliant with the Provisions of the Development Code relating to on-site and off-site improvements. The Project’s off-site improvements will include a Class 1 Multi-Use along Esplanade Avenue as required per the Trails Master Plan. Additionally, the Project will be conditioned to dedicate and provide improvement along Esplanade Avenue, Cawston Avenue, and Seventh Street. On-site improvements will include 3.26-acres of open space amenities and connections to the proposed Class I Multi-Use Trail. The proposed modified development standards for the Project will accommodate flexibility in site planning and property development, while still upholding the intentions and goals of the Development Code by creating a cohesive neighborhood community. Therefore, the Project is found to be compliant with all the applicable provisions of the development code relating to both on-site and off-site improvements. d. Ensure compatibility of property uses within the zone and general neighborhood of the proposed development. The Project will include single-family residential uses and complementary recreational and open space areas. The combination of uses is generally considered compatible and will create a cohesive residential neighborhood. The development of the Class I Multi-Use Trail will continue the intent of creating an integrated trails network throughout the City and will serve as an amenity for residents nearby and within the development. The Project site is bound by residential uses. 5.1.b Packet Pg. 36 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 The surrounding land uses designations include: Specific Plan to the west, Low Density Residential to the north, Very Low Density Residential to the east, and City of Hemet to the south. Development surrounding the Project Site is planned to be of similar character, land use, and density. Therefore, the proposed Project is found to be compatible the zone and with the general neighborhood of the proposed development. 2. The proposed project will produce a comprehensive development of superior quality and excellence of design (e.g., appropriate variety of structure placement and orientation opportunities, appropriate mix of structure sizes, high quality architectural design, significantly increased amounts of landscaping and improved open space, improved solutions to the design and placement of parking and loading facilities, incorporation of a program of highly enhanced amenities e.g., additional public art], LEED or other “green” related standards, etc.) than might otherwise occur from more typical development applications; The proposed Project includes 3.26-acres of common areas and recreational amenities. This includes play areas, turf / open space area, and picnic areas. The Project additionally proposes to construct a Class I Multi-Use Trail along Esplanade Avenue. This trail will include a meandering six (6) foot sidewalk, landscaped parkway located on both sides of the walkway, and proposed channel. This trail will connect to the internal pedestrian paths. The architectural styles proposed will reflect styles farm style inspired. The Project, with its architectural styles, supporting landscape palette, open spaces, and monumentation, offers a development with excellence of design. The architectural styles include Spanish, Prairie, and Farmhouse for the future 419 dwelling units, accompanied by nine (9) color schemes. The incorporation of multiple styles and color options is intended to enhance visual interest while maintaining a unified aesthetic throughout the subdivision. In addition, the PDP proposes five (5) distinct floor plans, each offering three (3) elevation types. The design of the residential lots and variation in architecture creates a diverse community and avoids a monotonous appearance. 3. Proper standards and conditions have been imposed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare; The Project Site is currently and has historically been used for agricultural purposes. Due to this fact, the environmental analysis of the Project Site included a Phase I Environmental Safety Assessment (Phase I ESA) to analyze any hazards that could result from development of the site. The Phase I ESA found that due to the historical use of this property for agricultural purposes dating back from at least 1930’s, it is possible agricultural chemicals 5.1.b Packet Pg. 37 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 such as pesticides and fertilizers have likely been applied to crops grown on the Proposed Project Site. Through the adoption of the Mitigation and Monitoring Program within the Conditions of Approval for the Project, any hazards that could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the conversion of agricultural land to residential uses will be significantly reduced to create a safe, healthy environment. Additionally, plans for the proposed residential development will be required to be submitted and approved through Site Plan and Design Review process. Additionally, the Zoning, Fire, and Building Codes will ensure that that the development of the project will meet applicable safety standards. Therefore, it is found that with the incorporation of the above mentioned Mitigation Measures, Conditions of Approval, and the requirements of the Zoning, Fire, and Building Codes will ensure the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. 4. Proper on-site traffic circulation (e.g., pedestrian and vehicular) and control is designed into the development to ensure protection for fire suppression and police surveillance equal to or better than what would normally be created by compliance with the minimum setback and parcel width standards identified in Article 2 (Zones, Allowable Land Uses, and Zone Specific Standards); The proposed Planned Development Permit incorporates a comprehensive internal circulation system designed to accommodate both vehicular and pedestrian traffic while ensuring adequate access for emergency response and public safety services. The Project has been reviewed for compliance with applicable City standards and the requirements of the City Engineer, Riverside County Fire Department, and Sheriff’s Department. The internal street network is designed to provide efficient circulation and connectivity throughout the Project site. Roadway widths, including minimum 24-foot fire access lanes where applicable, and turning radii have been designed to accommodate emergency vehicles, service vehicles, and passenger traffic. The interconnected street system enhances accessibility for fire suppression and law enforcement response. Pedestrian circulation is supported through sidewalks, paseos, and connections to on-site parks and adjacent improvements, including the Class I multi-use trail along Esplanade Avenue. These features promote safe and convenient pedestrian movement throughout the community. Based on the foregoing, the Project provides proper on-site traffic circulation and control for both vehicular and pedestrian movement and ensures protection for fire suppression and police services equal to or better than that which would be achieved through strict compliance with standard 5.1.b Packet Pg. 38 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 development requirements.. 5. The subject parcel is adequate in terms of size, shape, topography, and circumstances to accommodate the proposed development; The proposed Project Site is generally flat and is shaped to accommodate a proper lot layout. Section 17.620.020 of the Development Code states that the minimum lot size for a Planned Development Permit is 2 acres. The proposed Project site greatly exceeds this requirement and is 73.06-net acres. The proposed Project will provide an efficient use of land that will meet the purpose and intent of the Low Density Residential (LDR) General Plan land use designation by modifying the development standards to accommodate a 2-7 dwelling unit per acre development as required by the 2024 General Plan. Therefore, the subject parcel is adequate in terms of size, shape, topography, and circumstances to accommodate the proposed development. 6. Adequate public services and facilities exist, or will be provided, in compliance with the conditions of approval, to serve the proposed development and the approval of the proposed development will not result in a reduction of public services to properties in the vicinity to be a detriment to public health, safety, and general welfare; Adequate public services and facilities exist, or will be provided, to serve the proposed development. The Project has been reviewed by applicable City departments and service providers, including Public Works, Public Utilities, Sheriff’s Department, and Riverside County Fire Department, to ensure that the development can be adequately served. Utility services, including potable water, wastewater, electricity, natural gas, telecommunications, and solid waste services, are available within the vicinity of the Project site or will be extended to serve the development. Eastern Municipal Water District has indicated its willingness and ability to provide water and wastewater service to the Project. The Project will be conditioned to ensure that all required infrastructure improvements are constructed and that service connections and applicable fees are provided prior to occupancy. Emergency access and response capabilities have been incorporated into the Project design and will be subject to review and approval by the appropriate agencies. Based on the foregoing, adequate public services and facilities exist, or will be provided, to serve the Project, and the proposed development will not result in a reduction of service levels to surrounding properties. 5.1.b Packet Pg. 39 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 7. The proposed development, as conditioned, will not have a substantial adverse effect on surrounding property or their allowed use; The proposed development will not have a substantial adverse effect on surrounding properties or their allowed uses. The Project is consistent with the General Plan and zoning designations of the surrounding area and represents a logical extension of existing and planned residential development. The Project has been designed to be compatible with adjacent uses through site planning, building placement, and the incorporation of landscaping, open space, and internal circulation. The transition from the Project site to surrounding properties is appropriate for the area, whether adjacent lands remain in agricultural use or develop in accordance with the General Plan. The Project is subject to Conditions of Approval and compliance with applicable Municipal Code requirements, including noise, lighting, and traffic standards, as well as the California Building Code and Fire Code. These requirements are intended to prevent nuisances and ensure that the development does not create adverse impacts on surrounding properties. Based on the foregoing, the proposed development, as conditioned, will not have a substantial adverse effect on surrounding property or their allowed use. 8. If the development proposes to mix residential and commercial uses whether done in a vertical or horizontal manner, the residential use is designed in a manner that it is appropriately buffered from the commercial use and is provided sufficiently enhanced amenities to create a comfortable and healthy residential environment and to provide a positive quality of life for the residents. The enhanced amenities may include additional landscaping, additional private open space, private or separated entrances, etc; The Project does not propose a mix of residential and commercial uses as the project does not include Commercial uses. 9. The design, location, operating characteristics, and size of the proposed development will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity, in terms of aesthetic values, character, scale, and view protection; and This project will have the appropriate buffers such as exterior walls and perimeter landscaping to ensure that it will be compatible with any future land use whether it remains agricultural, develops with Residential, Commercial or a project that integrates both, in accordance with the General Plan. 5.1.b Packet Pg. 40 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 10. The applicant agrees in writing to comply with any and all of the conditions imposed by the review authority in the approval of the Planned Development Permit. The Applicant has agreed with all of the conditions imposed by the review authority prior to the issuance of any permits or recordation of any documents. 5.1.b Packet Pg. 41 At t a c h m e n t F i n d i n g s o f F a c t s C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 1 of 58 Ap p r o v a l D a t e T e n t a t i v e Ef f e c t i v e D a t e T e n t a t i v e Ex p i r a t i o n D a t e T e n t a t i v e PR O J E C T L O C A T I O N W e s t s i t e o f C a w s t o n A v e n u e e x t e nd i n g b e t w e e n S e v e n t h S t r e e t a n d E s p l a n a d e A v e n u e Sa n J a c i n t o C A A P N 4 3 2 2 6 0 0 0 9 4 3 2 2 6 0 0 2 6 4 3 2 2 6 0 0 2 7 AP P L I C A N T Ra m o n a D a i r y L L C Ri c h a r d M i c h e a l 24 5 1 R a m o n a E x p r e s s w a y Sa n J a c i n t o C A 9 2 5 8 2 AC C E P T E D A N D A G R E E D T O B Y Ap p l i c a n t s i g n a t u r e D a t e PR O J E C T D E S C R I P T I O N A G e n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t f r o m V e r y L o w D e n s i t y R e s i d e n t i a l to L o w D e n s i t y R e s i d e n t i a l a C h a n g e o f Z o n e f r o m R u r a l Re s i d e n t i a l t o R e s i d e n t i a l L o w D e n s i t y a p p r o v a l o f a P l a n n ed D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 t o su b d i v i d e t h r e e p a r c e l s i n t o 4 1 9 s i n g l e f a m il y r e s i d e n t i a l l o t s o n a p p r o x i m a t e l y 7 3 9 7 g r o s s a c r e s i n c l u d i n g o n s i t e r o a d w a y s pa r k s a d e t e n t i o n b a s i n a n d l a n d s c a p i n g 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 4 2 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 2 of 58 Ge n e r a l R e q u i r e m e n t s I n f o r m a t i o n A. T o t h e e x t e n t p e r m i t t e d b y l a w t h e a p p l i c a n t l i c e n s e e s h a l l b y a c c e p t i n g t h e s e c o n d i t i o n s a g r e e t o d e f e n d w i t h l e g a l co u n s e l o f C i t y s s e l e c t i o n i n d e m n i f y a n d h o l d h a r m l e s s t he C i t y a n d i t s e l e c t e d a n d a p p o i n t e d o f f i c i a l s a g e n t s at t o r n e y s e m p l o y e e s a n d o f f i c e r s f r o m a n y a c t i o n c la i m o r p r o c e e d i n g b r o u g h t b y a n y p a r t y o t h e r t h a n t h e ap p l i c a n t l i c e n s e e a g a i n s t t h e C i t y o r i t s e l e c t e d a n d a p p o i n t e d o f f i c i a l s a g e n t s e m p l o y e e s a n d o f f i c e r s t o a t t a c k s e t as i d e v o i d o r a n n u l a d i s c r e t i o n a r y l a n d u s e a p p r o v a l o f t h e C i t y w h i c h a c t i o n i s b r o u g h t w i t h i n t h e a p p l i c a b l e s t a t u t e of l i m i t a t i o n s T h e r e q u i r e d i n d e m n i f i c a t i o n s h a l l i n c l u d e d a ma g e s a w a r d e d a g a i n s t t h e C i t y i f a n y c o s t s o f s u i t at t o r n e y s f e e s a n d o t h e r c o s t s a n d e x p e n s e s i n c u r r e d i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e a c t i o n T h e C i t y s h a l l p r o m p t l y n o t i f y t h e ap p l i c a n t l i c e n s e e o f a n y s u c h c l a i m a c t i o n o r p r o c e e d i n g a n d c o o p e r a t e f u l l y i n t h e d e f e n s e B. T h e r e s i d e n t i a l s u b d i v i s i o n s h a l l c o m p l y w i t h a l l r e q u i r e d d e v e l o p m e n t s t a n d a r d s o f t h e D e v e l o p m e n t C o d e a n d t h e Pl a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t P D P W h e n a c o n f l i c t b e t w e e n t h e D e v e l o p m e n t C o d e a n d t h e P D P e x i s t s t h e P D P st a n d a r d s w i l l s u p e r s e d e t he D e v e l o p m e n t C o d e C. A n S B 3 3 0 P r e l i m i n a r y A p p l i c a t i o n w a s s u b m i t t e d f o r t h i s d e v e l o p m e n t a n d b e c a m e e f f e c t i v e o n M a r c h 3 1 2 0 2 5 t h e V e s t i n g D a t e w h i c h i s t h e d a t e t h e a p p l i c a n t s u b m i t t ed a c o m p l e t e a p p l i c a t i o n p u r s u a n t t o G o v e r n m e n t C o d e Se c t i o n 6 5 9 4 1 1 Th e C i t y wi l l u t i l i z e t h e d e v e l o p m e n t s t a n d a r d s an d f e e s i n e f f e c t o n M a r c h 3 1 2 0 2 5 D. T h e r e s i d e n t i a l s u b d i v i s i o n s h a l l c o m p l y w i t h t h e S u b d i v i s i o n M a p A c t G o v e r n m e n t C o d e S e c t i o n 6 6 4 1 0 e t s e q a n d Ti t l e 1 6 S u b d i v i s i o n s o f t h e M u n i c i p a l C o d e E. T h e e f f e c t i v e d a t e o f T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 i s t e n 1 0 d a y s f o l l o w i n g t h e a p p r o v a l d a t e T h e a p p r o v a l w i l l l a p s e if a f i n a l m a p h a s n o t r e c o r d e d w i t h i n th r e e 3 y e a r s f r o m t h e d a t e u p o n w h i c h t h e a p p r o v a l w a s g r a n t e d U n l e s s a ti m e e x t e n s i o n i s a p p r o v e d b y t h e C i t y s ap p l i c a b l e r e v i e w a u t h o r i t y a p p l i c a t i o n s fo r t i m e e x t e n s i o n s m u s t b e r e c e i v e d pr i o r t o t h e e x p i r a t i o n d a t e T h e f i l i n g o f a f i n a l m a p f o r p h a s e 1 o f t h e T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p s h a l l e x t e n d t h e l i f e o f t h e re m a i n i n g p o r t i o n o f t h e T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p c o n s i s t e n t w i th G o v e r n m e n t C o d e s e c t i o n 6 6 4 5 2 6 T h e T e n t a t i v e T r a c t Ma p m a y b e r e c o r d e d i n p h a s e s i n a m a n n e r c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e p h a s i n g m a p 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 4 3 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 3 of 58 F. T h e d e v e l o p e r a p p l i c a n t o r s u c c e s s o r i n i n t e r e s t s h a l l p a y a n y o u t s t a n d i n g p l a n n i n g a p p l i c a t i o n o r p r o c e s s i n g f e e s wi t h i n t e n 1 0 d a y s o f C i t y s r e q u e s t t h e r e f o r e a n d p r i o r t o pe r m i t s b e i n g e x e r c i s e d F a i l u r e t o d o s o w i l l b e g r o u n d s fo r C o d e E n f o r c e m e n t a c t i o n s r e v o c a t i o n o r f u r t h e r l e g a l a c t i o n G. T h e P r o j e c t s h a l l f u l l y a n d c o n t i n u a l l y c o m p l y w i t h a l l a p p l i c a b l e c o n d i t i o n s o f a p p r o v a l S t a t e F e d e r a l a n d l o c a l l a w s in e f f e c t a t t h e t i m e t h e p e r m i t i s a p p r o v e d a n d e x e r c i s e d an d w h i c h m a y b e c o m e e f f e c t i v e a n d a p p l i c a b l e t h e r e a f t e r Fa i l u r e t o d o s o w i l l b e g r o u n d s f o r C o d e E n f o r c e m e n t a c t i o n s r e v o c a t i o n o r f u r t h e r l e g a l a c t i o n H. T h i s p e r m i t s h a l l r u n w i t h t h e l a n d a s s o c i a t e d t o t h e p r o j e c t p e r m i t a n d c o n t i n u e s t o b e v a l i d u p o n c h a n g e o f ow n e r s h i p A l l a p p l i c a b l e c o n d i t i o n s o f a p p r o v a l s h a l l c o nt i n u e t o a p p l y w i t h a c h a n g e i n p r o p e r t y o w n e r s h i p I. Al l p l a n s s u b m i t t e d t o t h e C i t y s h a l l b e i n s u b s t a n t i a l c o n f o r m a n c e w i t h t h e p l a n s i n t h i s a p p r o v a l a s c o n d i t i o n e d T h i s co n d i t i o n a p p l i e s t o s i t e p l a n s g r a d i n g p l a n s l a n d s c a p e p l a n s, b u i l d i n g p l a n s e l e v a t i o n s a n d a l l o t h e r i l l u s t r a t i o n s te x t o r p l a n s s u b m i t t e d t o t h e Ci t y i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e P r o j e c t J. T h e a p p r o v e d e n t i t l e m e n t c a n n o t b e l e g a l l y c o n d u c t e d o n t h e s u b j e c t p r o p e r t y u n t i l a l l a p p l i c a b l e c o n d i t i o n s o f ap p r o v a l h a v e b e e n m e t t o t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e P l a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t K. T h e a p p l i c a n t s h a l l b e s u b j e c t t o a l l a p p l i c a b l e d e v e l o p m e nt f e e s S u c h f e e s m a y i n c l u d e b u t n o t b e l i m i t e d t o De v e l o p m e n t I m p a c t F e e s P a r k F e e s S c h o o l F e e s T r a n s p or t a t i o n U n i f o r m M i t i g a t i o n F e e s a n d M u l t i p l e S p e c i e s Ha b i t a t C o n s e r v a t i o n P l a n F e e s L. S i g n s s h a l l b e p e r m i t t e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h C h a p t e r 1 7 3 3 5 Si g n R e g u l a t i o n s o f t h e D e v e l o p m e n t C o d e i n e f f e c t o n th e V e s t i n g D a t e A n y s i g n s i n c l u d i n g e x t e r i o r m o u n t e d m o n u me n t a n d w i n d o w s i g n s s h a l l b e s u b j e c t t o s e p a r a t e re v i e w a n d a s s e s s m e n t A s e p a r a t e s i g n a p p l i c a t i o n i n c l u d i n g f e e s a n d a d d i t i o n a l s e t s o f p l a n s w i l l b e n e c e s s a r y pr i o r t o s i g n p e r m i t i s s u a n c e M. T h e C i t y s h a l l h a v e t h e r i g h t t o i n s p e c t t h e s i t e a n d f a c i l i ti e s t o e n s u r e c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e c o n d i t i o n s o f a p p r o v a l a n d to r e c o v e r i t s a c t u a l c o s t s r e l a t e d t o s u c h i n sp e c t i o n s f r o m t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r o r t e n a n t 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 4 4 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 4 of 58 N. S i t e P l a n a n d D e s i g n R e v i e w S P D R f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e d w e l l i n g u n i t s s h a l l e n s u r e t h a t a l l l u m b e r s c r a p s co m b u s t i b l e m a t e r i a l s a n d o t h e r d e b r i s b e p i c k e d u p d a i l y o r m o r e o f t e n a s r e q u i r e d b y t h e B u i l d i n g a n d S a f e t y Di v i s i o n O. A l l e x i s t i n g a n d n e w u t i l i t i e s a d j a c e n t t o a n d o n t h e P r o j e ct s i t e s h a l l b e l o c a t e d u n d e r g r o u n d a s p e r C i t y o f S a n Ja c i n t o M u n i c i p a l C o d e S e c t i o n 1 5 3 2 P. In t h e e v e n t o f a c o n f l i c t b e t w e e n a n y c o n d i t i o n s f o r t h i s a p p r o v a l t h e m o s t r e s t r i c t i v e r e g u l a t i o n s s h a l l a p p l y Q. T h e c o n t r a c t o r s h a l l c o m p l y w i t h t h e f o ll o w i n g b e s t p r a c t i c e s d u r i n g t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n p h a s e o f t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o Th e e r e c t i o n i n c l u d i n g e x c a v a t i o n d e m o l i t i o n a l t e r a t i o n o r r e p a i r o f a n y b u i l d i n g s h a l l o c c u r b e t w e e n t h e ho u r s of s e v e n a m a n d s e v e n p m o n w e e k d a y s a n d S a t u r d a y s a n d b e t w e e n 9 0 0 a m a n d 6 0 0 p m o n Su n d a y s a n d h o l i d a y s e x c e p t w h e n s u c h w o r k c o m p l i e s wi t h t h e t e r m s o f a t e m p o r a r y u s e p e r m i t w h i c h m a y be i s s u e d b y t h e c o m m u n i t y d e v e l o p m e n t d i r e c t o r o r h i s o r h e r d e s i g n e e u p o n a s h o w i n g o f s u f f i c i e n t n e e d du e t o h o t o r i n c l e m e n t w e a t h e r o r t h e u s e o f a n u n u s u a l l y l o n g p r o c e s s m a t e r i a l o r o t h e r c i r c u m s t a n c e s o f un u s u a l a n d c o m p e l l i n g n a t u r e o Du r i n g t h e e n t i r e a c t i v e c o n s t r u c t i o n p e r i o d e q u i p m e n t a n d t r u c k s u s e d f o r t h e p r o j e c t c o n s t r u c t i o n s h a l l u t i l i z e th e b e s t a v a i l a b l e n o i s e c o n t r o l t e c h n i q u e s e g i m p r ov e d m u f f l e r s u s e o f i n t a k e s i l e n c e r s d u c t s e n g i n e en c l o s u r e s a n d a c o u s t i c a l l y a t t e n u a t i n g s h i e l d s o r s h r o u d s w h e r e v e r f e a s i b l e o Du r i n g t h e e n t i r e a c t i v e c o n s t r u c t i o n p e r i o d s t a t i o n a r y no i s e s o u r c e s s h a l l b e l o c a t e d a s f a r f r o m s e n s i t i v e re c e p t o r s a s p o s s i b l e a n d t h e y s h a l l b e in c o r p o r a t e d t o t h e e x t e n t f e a s i b l e o Se l e c t h a u l r o u t e s t h a t a v o i d t h e g r e a t e s t a m o u n t o f s e n s i t iv e u s e a r e a s A v o i d s o i l h a u l i n g t h r o u g h r e s i d e n t i a l ar e a s o Si g n s s h a l l b e p o s t e d a t t h e j o b s i t e e n t r a n c e s w i t h i n t h e o n si t e c o n s t r u c t i o n z o n e s a n d a l o n g q u e u e i n g l a n e s i f a n y t o r e i n f o r c e t h e p r o h i b i t i o n o f u n n e c e s s a r y e n g i n e id l i n g A l l o t h e r e q u i p m e n t s h a l l b e t u r n e d o f f i f n o t i n us e f o r m o r e t h a n 5 m i n u t e s 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 4 5 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 5 of 58 o Eq u i p m e n t s h a l l b e m a i n t a i n e d a n d o p e r a t e d s u c h t h a t l o a d s a r e s e c u r e d f r o m r a t t l i n g o r b a n g i n g R. A c o p y o f a l l p a g e s o f t h e s e C o n d i t i o n s s h a l l b e i n c l u d e d i n t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n d r a w i n g p a c k a g e s f o r g r a d i n g p l a n s a n d bu i l d i n g p e r m i t s i n c l u d i n g l a n d s c a p i n g p e r m i t s S. D u r i n g t h e e n t i r e a c t i v e c o n s t r u c t i o n p e r i o d an d t o t h e e x t e n t f e a s i b l e t h e u s e o f n o i s e pr o d u c i n g s i g n a l s i n c l u d i n g ho r n s w h i s t l e s a l a r m s a n d b e l l s s h a l l b e f o r s a f e t y w a r n in g p u r p o s e s o n l y T h e c o n s t r u c t i o n m a n a g e r s h a l l u s e sm a r t b a c k up a l a r m s w h i c h a u t o m a t i c a l l y a d j u s t t h e a l a r m l e v e l b a s e d o n t h e b a c k g r o u n d n o i s e l e v e l o r s w i t c h o f f ba c k up a l a r m s a n d r e p l a c e t h e m w i t h h u m a n s p o t t e r s i n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h a l l s a f e t y r e q u i r e m e n t s a n d l a w s T. A g r a d i n g p e r m i t s h a l l b e o b t a i n e d f r o m t h e C i t y o f S a n Ja c i n t o p r i o r t o t h e c o m m e n c e m e n t o f a n y g r a d i n g o u t s i d e of t h e C i t y m a i n t a i n e d R o a d r i g h t o f w a y U. T h e P r o j e c t i s r e q u i r e d t o c o m p l y w i t h S a n J a c i n t o D e v e l o p me n t C o d e S e c t i o n 1 7 3 0 0 0 8 0 w h i c h r e q u i r e s a l l e x t e r i o r li g h t i n g t o b e s h i e l d e d o r m o d i f i e d a n d l o c a t ed s o a s t o e l i m i n a t e s p i l l o v e r i l l u m i na t i o n o r g l a r e b e y o n d t h e p r o p e r t y li n e o r u p w a r d i n t o t h e s k y 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 4 6 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 6 of 58 En g i n e e r i n g D e p a r t m e n t G e n e r a l R e q u i r e m e n t s I n f o r m a t i o n V. W i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l f o r t h e a b o v e r e fe r e n c e d p r o j e c t t h e C i t y o f S a n J a c i n t o r e q u i r e s t h a t t h e de v e l o p e r p r o p e r t y o w n e r p r o v i d e s t h e f o l l o w i n g s t r e e t i m p r o v em e n t s a n d o r r o a d d e d i c a t i o n s i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e Ci t y o f S a n J a c i n t o M u n i c i p a l C o d e I t i s u n d e r s t o o d t h a t t h e s i t e p l a n c o r r e c t l y s h o w s a l l e x i s t i n g a n d p r o p o s e d ea s e m e n t s t r a v e l e d w a y s r i g h t s o f w a y a n d d r a i n a g e c o u rs e s w i t h a p p r o p r i a t e Q s a n d t h e i r o m i s s i o n m a y r e q u i r e th e s i t e p l a n t o b e r e s u b m i t t e d f o r f u r t he r c o n s i d e r a t i o n T h e s e o r d i n a n c e s a n d t h e f o l l o w i n g c o n d i t i o n s a r e e s s e n t i a l pa r t s a n d r e q u i r e m e n t o c c u r r i n g i n O N E i s a s b i n d i n g as t h o u g h o c c u r r i n g i n a l l T h e y a r e i n t e n d e d t o b e co m p l i m e n t a r y a n d t o d e s c r i b e t h e c o n d i t i o n s f o r a c o m p le t e d e s i g n o f t h e i m p r o v e m e n t s U n l e s s o t h e r w i s e n o t e d a l l of f s i t e i m p r o v e m e n t s a s c o n d i t i o n e d s h a l l b e i n s t a l l e d pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f a n y o c c u p a n c y p e r m i t s A l l q u e s t i o n s re g a r d i n g t h e t r u e m e a n i n g o f t h e c o n d i t i o n s s h a l l b e r e f e r r e d t o t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r s o f f i c e I n t h e e v e n t o f a c o n f l i c t be t w e e n a n y c o n d i t i o n s s t a t e d b e l o w t h o s e i m p o s e d b y P l a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t a n d o t h e r s a n d r e q u i r e m e n t s i d e n t i f i e d in t h e a p p r o v e d T r a f f i c i m p a c t A n a l y s i s t h e m o s t s t r i n g e n t i n t h e o p i n i o n o f t h e C i t y s h a l l p r e v a i l W. T h e p r o j e c t g r a d i n g s h a l l b e i n a m a n n e r t o p e r p e t u a t e e x i s ti n g n a t u r a l p a t t e r n s A n y d e v i a t i o n f r o m t h i s c o n c e n t r a t i o n or i n c r e a s e i n r u n o f f m u s t h a v e a p p r o v a l o f a d j a c e n t p r op e r t y o w n e r s a n d C i t y E n g i n e e r T h e d e v e l o p e r p r o p e r t y ow n e r s h a l l a c c e p t t h e o f f s i t e r u n o f f a n d c o n v e y t o a c c e p t a b l e o u t l e t X. P r i o r t o c o m m e n c e m e n t o f a n y c o n s t r u c t i o n o r i n s t a l l a t i o n of f e n c i n g i n p u b l i c r i g h t o f w a y a n e n c r o a c h m e n t p e r m i t sh a l l b e o b t a i n e d f r o m t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r s o f f i c e Y. T h e d e v e l o p e r p r o p e r t y o w n e r s h a l l s e c u r e C i t y s a nd a p p r o p r i a t e a g e n c i e s c l e a r a n c e s a n d a p p r o v a l s o f t h e im p r o v e m e n t p l a n s 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 4 7 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 7 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o R e c o r d a t i o n o f t h e F i n a l M a p P h a s e 1 Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 1 Th e F i n a l M a p s h a l l a c c u r a t e l y d e p i ct t h e T y p i c a l R e a r Y a r d s e c t i o n s th e P D P Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 1 al l o w i n g t h e i n c r e a s e o f f e e s t o e n s u r e c o n t i n u e d m a i n or e l i m i n a t e d A H o m e o w n e r s Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 1 A Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 1 th e p u b l i c i m p r o v e m e n t s 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 4 8 Attachment: Conditions of Approval ( ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 8 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o R e c o r d a t i o n o f t h e F i n a l M a p P h a s e 1 Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 1 A t o t a l o f 5 2 f e e t 5 2 s h a l l b e d e d i c a t e d f o r a l l i n t e r i o r s t r e e t s 1 a n d w i l l b e p r i v a t e l y m a i n t a i n e d Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 1 A t o t a l o f ma i n t a i n e d s t r e e t Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 1 A t o t a l o f ma i n t a i n e d s t r e e t Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 1 fo o t w i d e h a l f w i d t h r i g h t o f re q u i r e d a d d i t i o n a l 2 0 f e e t 2 0 o f r i g h t o f w a y t o p r o v i d e f o r a 5 0 wi d e h a l f w i d t h r i g h t o f w a y Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 1 fo o t w i d e h a l f w i d t h r i g h t o f re q u i r e d a d d i t i o n a l 2 0 f e e t 2 0 o f r i g h t o f w a y t o p r o v i d e f o r a 5 0 wi d e h a l f w i d t h r i g h t o f w a y 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 4 9 Attachment: Conditions of Approval ( Chacon Farms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 9 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o R e c o r d a t i o n o f t h e F i n a l M a p P h a s e 1 Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 1 St a n d a r d N o 8 0 5 Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 1 ab a n d o n s s u c h o f f e r s Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 1 by t h e d e v e l o p e r p r o p e r t y o w n e r t h r o u g h t h e s a i d a n n e x a t i o n Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 1 En g i n e e r f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l x St r e e t I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n s x St r e e t L i g h t P l a n s p r e p a r e d b y a r e g i s t e r e d E l e c t r i c a l E n g i n e e r x Si g n i n g a n d S t r i p i n g T r a f f i c Si g n a l P l a n s a s a p p r o p r i a t e x On s i t e G r a d i n g a n d E r o s i o n C o n t r o l P l a n s ap p r o v e d W D I D N o x Ge o t e c h n i c a l R e p o r t f o r r e f e r e n c e x Se w e r a n d W a t e r P l a n s x St o r m D r a i n I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n s x Hy d r o l o g y a n d H y d r a u l i c A n a l y s i s x Fi n a l W Q M P f o r r e f e r e n c e i n c l u d i n g W D I D N o 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 5 0 Attachment: Conditions of Approval ( ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 10 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o R e c o r d a t i o n o f t h e F i n a l M a p P h a s e 1 x Tr a f f i c S i g n a l P l a n Th e d e s i g n s h a l l c o m p l y w i t h E a s t e r n M u n i c i p a l W a t e r D i s t r i c t E M W D Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y Fl o o d C o n t r o l a n d W a t e r C o n s e r v a t i o n Di s t r i c t R C F C D R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y T r an s p o r t a t i o n D e p a r t m e n t C a l t r a n s Ci t y o f S a n J a c i n t o a n d A D A m o s t r e c e n t s t a co o r d i n a t e d w i t h t h e a p p r o v e d p l a n s o f t h e a d j a c e n t d e v e l o p m e n t s Ph a s e 1 NO T I C E O F D R A I N A G E F E E S by t h e C i t y o f S a n J a c i n t o p u r s u a n t t o O r d i n a n c e 1 3 66 0 0 1 e t s e q o f t h e G o v e r n m e n t C o d e a n d t h a t s a i d Or d i n a n c e 1 3 th e p r o p e r ti m e o f i s s u a n c e o f t h e a c t u a l p e r m i t Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 1 im p r o v e m e n t s x On e s u c h m e c h a n i s m i s a an n e x a t i o n m u s t b e f i n a l i z e d i n o r d e r t o s a t i s f y t h i s c o n d i t i o n 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 5 1 Attachment: Conditions ofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 11 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o R e c o r d a t i o n o f t h e F i n a l M a p P h a s e 1 Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 1 x On e s u c h m e c h a n i s m i s a fo r p u b l i c s a f e t y s e r v i c e s En g i n e e r s E s t i m a t e a n d e s t a b l i s h e d b y t a x z o n e Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o R e c o r d a t i o n o f t h e F i n a l M a p P h a s e 2 Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 2 A f i n a l m a p f o r p h a s e 2 re c o r d e d Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 2 th e p u b l i c i m p r o v e m e n t s Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 2 A t o t a l o f 5 2 f e e t 5 2 s h a l l b e de d i c a t e d f o r a l l i n t e r i o r s t r e e t s ph a s e 2 I n t e r i o r S t r e e t s w i l l b e p r i v a t e l y m a i n t a i n e d 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 5 2 Attachment: Conditions of Approval ( ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 12 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o R e c o r d a t i o n o f t h e F i n a l M a p P h a s e 2 Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 2 56 f o o t w i d e h a l f w i d t h r i g h t o f th e r e q u i r e d a d d i t i o n a l 1 7 f e e t 1 7 o f r i g h t o f w a y t o p r o v i d e f o r a 7 3 Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 2 St a n d a r d N o 8 0 5 Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 2 of f e r s Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 2 be m a i n t a i n e d b y t h e C i t y a n d c o s t Pr i o r t o Re c o r d a t i o n o f th e F i n a l M a p Ph a s e 2 En g i n e e r f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l x St r e e t I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n s x St r e e t L i g h t P l a n s p r e p a r e d b y a r e g i s t e r e d E l e c t r i c a l E n g i n e e r x Si g n i n g a n d S t r i p i n g T r a f f i c Si g n a l P l a n s a s a p p r o p r i a t e x On s i t e G r a d i n g a n d E r o s i o n C o n t ro l P l a n s P l a n s s h a l l s h o w t h e 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 5 3 Attachment: Conditions of Approval ( Chacon Farms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 13 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o R e c o r d a t i o n o f t h e F i n a l M a p P h a s e 2 ap p r o v e d W D I D N o x Ge o t e c h n i c a l R e p o r t f o r r e f e r e n c e x St o r m D r a i n I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n s x Hy d r o l o g y a n d H y d r a u l i c A n a l y s i s x Fi n a l W Q M P f o r r e f e r e n c e i n c l u d i n g W D I D N o x Tr a f f i c S i g n a l P l a n Ci t y o f S a n J a c i n t o a n d A D A m o s t r e c e n t s t a Ph a s e 2 NO T I C E O F D R A I N A G E F E E S by t h e C i t y o f S a n J a c i n t o p u r s u a n t t o O r d i n a n c e 1 3 66 0 0 1 e t s e q o f t h e G o v e r n m e n t C o d e a n d t h a t s a i d Or d i n a n c e 1 3 th e p r o p e r ti m e o f i s s u a n c e o f t h e a c t u a l p e r m i t 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 5 4 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 14 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o a S p e c i f i c D a t e 30 Gr a d i n g Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e B I O 1 B u r r o w i n g O w l P r e C o n s t r u c t i o n S u r v e y s Th e P r o j e c t A p p l i c a n t s h a l l r e t a i n a q u a l i f i e d B i o l o g i s t t o c o n d u c t a p r e co n s t r u c t i o n s u r v e y f o r b u r r o w i n g o w l o n t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t S i t e da y s p r i o r t o c o n s t r u c t i o n M e t h o d s f o r t h e p r e be c o n d u c t e d a s a o n e Su r v e y I n s t r u c t i o n s f o r t h e W e s t Co n s e r v a t i o n P l a n M S H C P 2 0 0 6 F o l an d m i n i m i z a t i o n m th e l o c a t i o n o f t h e a c t i v e b u r r o w wi t h r e s p e c t t o p l a n n e d a c t i v i t i e s be p l a c e d o n c o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s ar o u n d t h e a c t i v e b u r r o w T h e p r o t e c t i v e b u f f e r s h a l l b e f l a g g ma y b e c l o s e d f o l l o w i n g C D F W be p l a c e d a r o u n d t h e b u r r o w T h e p r o t e c t i v e b u f f e r s h a l l b e f l a g g e d c l e 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 5 5 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 15 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o a S p e c i f i c D a t e pr o v i d e d t o t h e P r o j e c t A p p l i c a n t t h e i r d e s i g n e e e g C o n s t r u c t i o n Su p e r v i s o r a n d t h e C i t y T h e P r o j e c t A p p l i c a n t s h a l l n o t p r o c e e d w i t h co n s t r u c t i o n u n t i l t h e a v o i d a n c e a n d mi n i m i z a t i o n m e a s u r e s h a v e b e e n ap p r o v e d b y t h e C i t y a n d a l l a p p r o p r i a t e p r o t e c t i o n s a r e i n p l a c e Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e B I O 2 N e s t i n g B i r d S u r v e y T o t h e e x t e n t p o s s i b l e ve g e t a t i o n r e m o v a l w i l l b e c o n d u c t e d d u r i n g t h e n o n ne s t i n g b i r d s a n d r a p t o r s I f c o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s w o u l d b e i n i t i a t e d th e p e a k b r e e d i n g s e a s o n f o r n e s t i n g b i r d s r a p t o r s F e b r u a r y 1 a p r e st r u c t u r e s T h e n e s t i n g pr e c o n s t r u c t i o n b u r r o w i n g o w l s u r v e y d e s c r i b e d i n M M B I O im p a c t a r e a c o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s c a n p r o c e e d ne s t t h e B i o l o g i s t w i l l d e t e r m i n e fo r n e s t i n g b i r d s a n d 3 0 0 t o 5 0 0 f e e t f o r n e s t i n g r a p t o r s N o w 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 5 6 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 16 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o a S p e c i f i c D a t e ma p s p r o v i d e d t o t h e P r o j e c t A p p l i c a n t t h e i r d e s i g n e e e g C o n s t r u c t i o n Su p e r v i s o r a n d t h e C i t y C o n s t r u c t i o n c a n p r o c e e d w i t h i n t h e p r o t e c t i v e bu f f e r w h e n t h e q u a l i f i e d B i o l o g i s t ha s d e t e r m i n e d t h a t t h e n e s t i s n o lo n g e r a c t i v e i e f l e d g l i n g s h a v e l e f t t h e n e s t o r t h e n e s t h a s f a i l e d 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 5 7 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 17 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f G r a d i n g P e r m i t Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Pl a n n i n g 28 A g r a d i n g p e r m i t s h a l l b e o b t a i n e d f r o m t h e C i t y o f S a n J a c i n t o p r i o r t o t h e co m m e n c e m e n t o f a n y g r a d i n g o u t s i d e o f t h e C i t y of w a y Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Pl a n n i n g 29 A c o p y o f a l l p a g e s o f t h e s e Co n d i t i o n s s h a l l b e i n c l u d e d i n t h e co n s t r u c t i o n d r a w i n g p a c k a g e s f o r g r a d i n g p l a n s Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Pl a n n i n g 30 A l l i m p o r t e d s o i l s f i l l s h a l l b e t e s t e d t o e n s u r e C o n t a m i n a n t s o f C o n c e r n C O C s m e e t t h e a p p l i c a b l e s c r e e n i n g l e v e l s a s o u t l i n e d i n D T S C s Pr e l i m i n a r y E n d a n g e r m e n t A s s e s s m e n t G u i d a n c e M a n u a l T h e ap p l i c a n t d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r o v i d e t h e f o l l o w i n g t o t h e P l a De p a r t m e n t f o r r e v i e w a. R e p o r t o f t e s t i n g p e r f o r m e d b. su i t a b l e f o r t h e i n t e n d e d l a n d u s e c. so i l f i l l a n d k n o w l e d g e o f p r i o r l a n d u s e Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Pl a n n i n g 31 Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e B I O 3 We s t e r n R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y R e g i o n a l Co n s e r v a t i o n A u t h o r i t y M u l t i p l e S pe c i e s H a b i t a t C o n s e r v a t i o n P l a n M S H C P F e e P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f a g r a d i n g p e r m i t t h e P r o j e c t Ap p l i c a n t s h a l l p a y t h e M S H C P m i t i g a t i o n f e e a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e C i t y o f Sa n J a c i n t o b a s e d o n t h e m o s t c u r r e n t r a t e s 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 5 8 Attachment: Conditions of Approval ( ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 18 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f G r a d i n g P e r m i t Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Pl a n n i n g 32 Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e B I O 4 MS H C P C o n s t r u c t i o n M i n i m i z a t i o n Me a s u r e s T h e P r o j e c t A p p l i c a n t a n d t h e i r d e s i g n e e i e C o n s t r u c t i o n Co n t r a c t o r s s h a l l f o l l o w r e q u i r e d MS H C P C o n s t r u c t i o n M i n i m i z a t i o n Me a s u r e s S e c t i o n 7 5 3 o f t h e M S H C P A p p l i c a b l e c o n s t r u c t i o n mi n i m i z a t i o n m e a s u r e s a r e l i s t e d b e l o w co n t r o l d e w a t e r i n g o r d i v e r s i o n s t r u c t u r e s be r e v i e w e d a n d a p p r o v e d b y t h e C i t y p r i o r t o c o n s t r u c t i o n br e e d i n g b i r d s a n d m i g r a t o r y n o n Ju n e 3 0 ti m e s o i l s a r e d e t e r m i n e d t o b e s u c c e s s f u l l y s t a b i l i z e d Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Pl a n n i n g 33 Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e C U L 1 Ar c h a e o l o g i c a l M o n i t o r T h e P r o j e c t pr o p o n e n t s h a l l r e t a i n a P r o j e c t A r c h ae o l o g i s t p r i o r t o t h e i n i t i a t i o n o f gr o u n d d i s t u r b i n g a c t i v i t i e s t o m o n i t o r g r o u n d oc c u r r i n g w i t h i n n a t i v e s e d i m e n t i n s i t u m a t e r i a l 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 5 9 Attachment: Conditions ofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 19 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f G r a d i n g P e r m i t or i g i n a r e d i s c o v e r e d a l l a c t i v i t i e s i n t h e i m m e d i a t e v i c i n i t y o f t h e f i n d w i t h i n a 5 0 af f i l i a t e d w i t h t h e a r e a T h e P r o j e c t of N a t i v e Am e r i c a n h u m a n r e m a i n s s h a l l b e c o n s i d e r e or i g i n a n d s u b j e c t t o s p e c i a l h a n d l i n g No n ar t i f a c t s s h a l l b e s u b j e c t e d t o c u r a t i o n o r r as d e e m e d a p p r o p r i a t e di s c o n t i n u e d A r e p o r t o f f i n d i n g s i n c l u d i n g ou t l i n e d a b o v e A c o p y o f t h e r e p o r t s h a l l a l s o b e f i l e d w i t h t h e E I C 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 6 0 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 20 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f G r a d i n g P e r m i t Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e Pe r m i t Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e C U L 2 Di s c o v e r y o f H u m a n R e m a i n s A l l di s c o v e r e d h u m a n r e m a i n s s h a l l b e t r ea t e d w i t h r e s p e c t a n d d i g n i t y Ca l i f o r n i a S t a t e l a w C a l i f o r n i a H e a l t h S a f e t y C o d e S e c t i o n 7 0 5 0 5 a n d fe d e r a l l a w a n d r e g u l a t i o n s A r c h a e o l o g i c al R e s o u r c e s P r o t e c t i o n A c t 1 6 Un i t e d S 4 3 C F R 1 0 a n d P u b l i c L a n d s I n t e r i o r 4 3 C F R 8 3 6 5 1 de f i n e d p r o t o c o l i f h u m a n r e m a i n s a r e d i s c o v e r e d i n t h e S 10 0 f o o t E S A b o u n d a r y w i l l b e e s t a b l i s h e d Pl a n n i n g D i v i s i o n s h a l l b e i m m e d i a t e l y n o t i f i e d pe r m i t t e e w i t h i n 2 4 h o u r s o f t h e d i s c o v e r y C o u n t y ex c a v a t i o n o r d i s t u r b a n c e o f t h e p o t e n t i a l 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 6 1 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 21 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f G r a d i n g P e r m i t Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Pl a n n i n g 35 Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e G E O 1 P a l e o n t o l o g i c a l T r e a t m e n t P l a n I n t h e e v e n t th a t p o t e n t i a l p a l e o n t o l o g i c a l r e s o ur c e s a r e d i s c o v e r e d d u r i n g g r o u n d di s t u r b i n g a c t i v i t i e s w o r k w i l l s t o p i n t h a t a r e a a n d w i t h i n 3 0 f e e t o f t h e fi n d u n t i l a q u a l i f i e d p a l e o n t o l o g i s t c a n a s s e s s t h e s i g n i f i c co n s t r u c t i o n r e l a t e d g r o u n d t lo w p o t e n t i a l t o c o n t a i n f o s s i l r e s o a p pe r m a n e n t r e t r i e v a b l e s t o r a g e A r e p o r t o f f i co m p l e t i o n o f t h e m i t i g a t i o n 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 6 2 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 22 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f G r a d i n g P e r m i t Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Pl a n n i n g 36 Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e T C R 1 Pr i o r t o g r a d i n g p e r m i t i s s u a n c e t h e de v e l o p e r s h a l l e n t e r i n t o a T r e a t m e n t a n d D i s p o s i t i o n A g r e e m e n t T D A wi t h t h e S o b o b a B a n d o f L u i s e ñ o In d i a n s t o a d d r e s s t r e a t m e n t a n d di s p o s i t i o n o f a r c h a e o l o g i c a l o r Tr i b a l C u l t u r a l R e s o u r c e s a n d h u m a n re m a i n s a s s o un c o v e r e d o r o t h e r w i s e d i s c o v e r e d d u r i n g g r o u n d Lu i s e ñ o I n d i a n s T h e T D A w i l Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Pl a n n i n g 37 I f t h e r e m a i n s a r e d e t e r m i n e d t o b e p r e h i s t o r i c t h e C o r o n e r w i l l n o t i f y t h e Na t i v e A m e r i c a n H e r i t a g e C o m m i s s i o n wh i c h w i l l d e t e r m i n e t h e i d e n t i t y of a n d n o t i f y a M o s t L i k e l y D e s c e n d a n t M L D W i t h t h e p e r m i s s i o n o f t h e la n d o w n e r o r h i s h e r a u t h o r i z e d r e p im m e d i a t e l re a s o n a b l y s u s p e c t e d t o o v e r l i e a d j a c e n t r e m a i n s a n d a 1 0 0 So b o b a B a n d o f L u i s e n o I n d i a n s a n d t h e C i t y o f S a n J a c i n t o P l a n n Di v i s i o n s h a l l b e i m m e d i a t e l y n o t i f i e d pe r m i t t e e w i t h i n 2 4 h o u r s o f t h e d i s c o v e r y 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 6 3 Attachment: Conditions ofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 23 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f G r a d i n g P e r m i t Sa f e t y C o d e a n d S t a t e C E Q A G u i d e l i n e s S e c t i o n 1 5 0 6 4 5 e N o f u r t h e r ex c a v a t i o n o r d i s t u r b a n c e o f t h e p o t e n t i a l h u m a n r e m a i n s o r a n y a r e a re a s o n a b l y s u s p e c t e d t o o v e r l i e a d d i t i o n a l r e m a i n s s h a l l o c c u r u n t i l a de t e r m i n a t i o n h a s b e e n m a d e a n y n o t i f i c a t i o n an d W i l d l i f e S e r v i c e T h e l i s t o in 1 9 1 6 M e x i c o i n 1 9 3 6 J a p a n i n 1 9 7 2 a n d R u s s i a i n 1 9 7 6 T h e l i an y b i r d s i n t h e o r d e r F a l c o n un l a w f u l t o t a k e a n y n o n Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Pl a n n i n g 39 A c o p y o f a l l p a g e s o f t h e s e Co n d i t i o n s s h a l l b e i n c l u d e d i n t h e co n s t r u c t i o n d r a w i n g p a c k a g e s f o r g r a d i n g p l a n s 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 6 4 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 24 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f G r a d i n g P e r m i t Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Pl a n n i n g 40 T h e p r o p o s e d s i t e d e s i g n B M P s s e l e c t e d f o r t h i s p r o j e c t h a v e b e e n ap p r o v e d i n c o n c e p t T h e p r o j e c t s h a l l s u b m i t a F i n a l A d d e n d u m W Q M P in c l u d i n g p l a n s a n d d e t a i l s p r o v i d i n g t h e e l e v a t i o n s a n d s l o p e s o f t h e t h r e e bi o r e t e n t i o n b a s i n s a n d o t h e r d e t a i l s f o r t h e an d a p p r o v e t h e F i n a l W Q M P d o c u m e n t p l a n s a n d d e t a i l s Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Pl a n n i n g 41 T h e d e v e l o p m e n t s h a l l b e s u b j e c t t o a l l p r o v i s i o n s o f C i t y o f S a n J a c i n t o Mu n i c i p a l C o d e C h a p t e r re v i s i o n s o r o r d i n a n c e s p e r t a i n i n g t h e r e t o Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Pl a n n i n g 42 A F i n a l W a t e r Q u a l i t y Ma n a g e m e n t P l a n W Q M P s h a l l b e s u b m i t t e d a n d ap p r o v e d i n c l u d i n g a p r o j e c t d e s c r i p t i o n a n d i d e n t i f y i n g B e s t Ma n a g e m e n t P r a c t i c e s B M P s t h a t w i l l b e u s e d o n po l l u t a n t s i n t o t h e s t o r m d r a i n s y s t e m t o t h e m a x i m u m e x t e n t st r u c t u r a l m e a s u r e s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e C i t y s a d o p t e d r e q u i r e m e n t s 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 6 5 Attachment: Conditions ofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 25 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f G r a d i n g P e r m i t Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Pl a n n i n g 43 T h e d e v e l o p e r a p p l i c a n t o r s u c c e s s o r i n i n t e r e s t s h a l l p r e p a r e a St o r m w a t e r P o l l u t i o n P r e v e n t i o n P l an S W P P P a n d o b t a i n a N o t i c e o f In t e n t N O I t o c o m p l y w i t h o b t a i n i n g c o v e r a g e u n d e r t h e N a t i o n a l Po l l u t a n t D i s c h a r g e E l i m i n a t i o n S y s t e m N P D E S G e n e r a l C o co v e r a g e u n d e r t h e N a t i o n a l P o l l u t a n t D i s c h a r Ge n e r a l C o n s t r u c t i o n P e r m i t Th e a p p l i c a n t d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r o v id e d o c u m e n t a t i o n t o t h e C i t y f o r re v i e w Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Pl a n n i n g 44 T h e c o n t r a c t o r s h a l l p r o v i d e a l e t t e r th a t a g r e e i n g t o f o l l o w t h e C i t y s Ge n e r a l P l a n a n d N o i s e O r d i n a n c e I n a d d i t i o n t h e l e t t e r s h a l l i n d i c a t e th e c o n t r a c t o r s h a l l i m p l e m e n t t h e f o l l o w i n g b e s t p r a c t i c e s d u r i n g t h e co n s t r u c t i o n p h a s e o f t h e d e v e l o p m e n t a. pr o h i b i t c o n s t r u c t i o n o n S u n d a y s a n d h o l i d a y s b. te l e p h o n e n u m b e r s o f t h e C i t y s a n d co r r e c t i v e a c t i o n a n d r e p o r t t o t h e C i t y 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 6 6 Attachment: Conditions ofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 26 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f G r a d i n g P e r m i t c. D u r i n g t h e e n t i r e a c t i v e c o n s t r uc t i o n p e r i o d e q u i p m e n t a n d t r u c k s us e d f o r t h e p r o j e c t c o n s t r u c t i o n s h a l l u t i l i z e t h e b e s t a v a i l a b l e n o i s e co n t r o l t e c h n i q u e s e g i m p r o v e d m u f f l e r s u s e o f i n t a k e s i l e n c e r s du c t s e n g i n e e n c l o s u r e s a n d a c o u s t i c a l l y a t t sh r o u d s w h e r e v e r f e a s i b l e d. sh a l l b e i n c o r p o r a t e d t o t h e e x t e n t f e a s i b l e e. ar e a s A v o i d s o i l h a u l i n g t h r o u g h r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a s f. S i g n s s h a l l b e p o s t e d a t t h e j o b s i t e e n t r a n c e s w i t h i n t h e o n si t e co n s t r u c t i o n z o n e s a n d a l o n g q u e u e i n g l a n e s i f a n y t o r e i n f o r c e t h e pr o h i b i t i o n o f u n n e c e s s a r y e n g i n e i d l i n g. A l l o t h e r e q u i p m e n t s h a l l b e tu r n e d o f f i f n o t i n u s e f o r m o r e t h a n 5 m i n u t e s g. th e u s e o f n o i s e pr o d u c i n g s i g n a l s i n c l u d i n g h o r n s w h i s t l e s a l a r m s an d b e l l s s h a l l b e f o r s a f e t y w a r n i n g p u r p o s e s o n l y T h e c o n s t r u c t i o n ma n a g e r s h a l l u s e s m a r t b a c k up a l a r m s w h i c h a u t o m a t i c a l l y a d j u s t th e a l a r m l e v e l b a s e d o n t h e b a c k g r o un d n o i s e l e v e l o r s w i t c h o f f b a c k up a l a r m s a n d r e p l a c e t h e m w i t h h u m a n s p o t t e r s i n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h al l s a f e t y r e q u i r e m e n t s a n d l a w s h. re q u i r e d f o r e m e r g e n c y r e s p o n s e b y t h e c o n t r a c t o r i. 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 6 7 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 27 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f G r a d i n g P e r m i t fi e l d i n s p e c t i o n s b y a p p l i c a n t p e r s o n ne l d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s j. E q u i p m e n t n o t i n u s e f o r f i v e m i n u t e s s h a l l b e s h u t o f f k. se c u r e d f r o m r a t t l i n g o r b a n g i n g l. no u n n e c e s s a r y r e v v i n g o f e q u i p m e n t Th e a p p l i c a n t d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r o v i d e a l e t t e r f r o m t h e c o n t r a c t o r ag r e e i n g t o i m p l e m e n t t h i s c o n d i t i o n Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Bu i l d i n g Sa f e t y sa t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e B u i l di n g S a f e t y D i v i s i o n a. T h e s i t e s h a l l b e w a t e r e d o n a n o n co n s t r u c t i o n a n d g r a d i n g b. tr a v e l c. th e s t r e e t 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 6 8 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 28 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f G r a d i n g P e r m i t Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Bu i l d i n g Sa f e t y du r i n g p e r i o d s o f h e a v y er o s i o n o f s t o r e d b a c k f i l l m a t e r i a l me a s u r e s s u c h a s t h e u s e o f s t r a w b a l e s o r s a n d b a g s s h a l l b e ca p t u r e a n d h o l d e r o d e d m a t e r i a l o n t h e Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Bu i l d i n g Sa f e t y ac t i v i t i e s 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 6 9 Attachment: Conditions ofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 29 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f G r a d i n g P e r m i t Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t Bu i l d i n g Sa f e t y a. st o p p e d a p p r o p r i a t e r e g u l a t o r y a g e n c i e s w i l l b e n o t i f i e d ac t i o n s w i l l b e i m p l e m e n t e d t o l i m i t t h e v o l u m e a n d a r e a b. re l e a s e d m a t e r i a l a r e b e l o w t h e r e g u l a t o r y r e of t h e e v e n t th e a b o v e a c t i o n s s h a l l b e d o c u m e n t e d a n d no h a z a r d t o h u m a n s o f t h e c o n t a m i n a t e d a r e a Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t En g i n e e r i n g 49 T h e d e v e l o p e r p r o p e r t y o w n e r s h a l l h a v e a p p r o v e d g r a d i n g a n d im p r o v e m e n t p l a n s e x e c u t e d g r a d i n g a g r e e m e n t a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e C i t y En g i n e e r a n d p o s t e d s e c u r i t i e s 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 7 0 Attachment: Conditions ofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 30 of 58 Ti m i n g Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f G r a d i n g P e r m i t Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Gr a d i n g P e r m i t En g i n e e r i n g 50 T h e d e v e l o p e r p r o p e r t y o w n e r s h a l l s u b m i t t h e f o l l o w i n g p l a n s a n d r e p o r t s to t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l a. O n s i t e G r a d i n g a n d E r o s i o n C o n t r o l P l a n s ap p r o v e d W D I D N o b. G e o t e c h n i c a l R e p o r t f o r r e f e r e n c e c. S t o r m D r a i n I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n s d. H y d r o l o g y a n d H y d r a u l i c A n a l y s i s e. F i n a l W Q M P f o r r e f e r e n c e i n c l u d i n g W D I D N o f. T r a f f i c S i g n a l P l a n Th e d e s i g n s h a l l c o m p l y w i t h R C F C D a n d ad j a c e n t d e v e l o p m e n t s 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 7 1 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 31 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f B u i l d i n g P e r m i t P h a s e 1 Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Pl a n n i n g 20 1 P e r m i t t o C o n s t r u c t a n d R u l e 2 0 3 th e p r o p e r p e r m i t s f r o m S C A Q M D we r e o b t a i n e d Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Pl a n n i n g Pl a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p co n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e p r o j e c t Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Pl a n n i n g st a n d a r d s a n d s p e c i f i c a t i o n s Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Pl a n n i n g th r o u g h t h i s e n t i t l e m e n t a s d e t e r m i n e d b y C i t y P l a n n i n g 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 7 2 Attachment: Conditions of Approval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 32 of 58 Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Pl a n n i n g Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Pl a n n i n g Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e H A Z 1 As b e s t o s C o n t a i n i n g M a t e r i a l s S u r v e y P r i o r to t h e d i s t u r b a n c e o f a n y s u s p e c t As b e s t o s C o n t a i n i n g M a t e r i a l s A C M s du r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n o r d e m o l i t i o n a c t i v i t i es a t t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t S i t e a co m p r e h e n s i v e s u r v e y s h a l l b e r e q u i r e d t o s a m p l e m a t e r i a l s o n s co n t r a c t o r s h a l l b e c o n s u l t e d f u r t h e r 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 7 3 Attachment: Conditions ofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 33 of 58 Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Pl a n n i n g Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e H A Z 2 Me t h a n e T e s t i n g P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f bu i l d i n g p e r m i t s m e t h a n e t e s t i n g s h a l l b e c o n d u c t e d b y a l i c e n s e d en g i n e e r g e o l o g i s t o r r e g i s t e r e d e n v i r o n m e n t a l a s s e s s o r a n d a s ne c e s s a r y s h a l l i n c l u d e m e a s u r e s t o r e d u c e c o n c e n t r a t i o n s o f m e t h a n e t o an a c c e p t a b l e l e v e l Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Pl a n n i n g im p l e m e n t t h e a p p r o v e d F i n a l p r o j e c t s p e c i f i c W Q M ma i n t e n a n c e r e q u i r e m e n t s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e W Q M P pu r s u a n t t o S e c t i o n X I I I o f t h e 2 0 1 0 N P D E S P e r m i t W Q M P C i t y W Q M P I n s p e c t o r wi l l b e n o t i f i e d f o r r e q u i r e du r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Pl a n n i n g in c o n f o r m a n c e w i t h C h a p t e r 1 7 3 2 5 Ir r i g a t i o n a n d S e c t i o n 1 7 3 2 5 0 6 0 De s i g n G u i d e l i n e s f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l b y t h e C i t y Ar c h i t e c t P l a n s s h o u l d da t e o f p e r m i t i s s u a n c e T h e L a n d s c a p e a n d I r r i g a t i o n S u b m i t t a l sh a l l i n c l u d e a. A c o m p l e t e d a p p l i c a t i o n p a c k e t p r o v i d e d b y t h e C i t y 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 7 4 Attachment: Conditions of Approval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 34 of 58 an d E T W U N o t e t h e E T o r a t e f o r S a n J a c i n t o i s 5 6 8 p e r S t a t e gu i d e l i n e s c. T h e s o i l s m a n a g e m e n t r e p o r t d. T h e l a n d s c a p e d e s i g n p l a n e. T h e i r r i g a t i o n d e s i g n p l a n f. T h e g r a d i n g p l a n Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Pl a n n i n g a. T h e d e v e l o p e r w i l l w o r k w i t h re m o v e e x i s t i n g w a l l s f e n c i n g d o u b l e w a l l s a r e n o t p e r m i t t e d b. T h e d e v e l o p e r w i l l s h o w o n t h e p l a n s h o w co l o r m a t e r i a l p i l a s t e r s i z e a n d c a p s Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Bu i l d i n g re q u i r e m e n t t h a t a l l m a t e r i a l s t h a t c a n b e r e c y c l e d s h a l l re c y c l e d T h i s i n c l u d e s b u t i s n o t li m i t e d t o w o o d m e t a l s c o n c r e t e ba s e a n d a s p h a l t T h e d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t a r e c y c l i n g p l a n t o t h e fo r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l p r i o r t o t h e s t a r t ac t i v i t i e s t o a c c o m p l i s h t h i s o b j e c t i v e Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Ri v e r s i d e C o u n t y Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 62 R e s i d e n t i a l F i r e S p r i n k l e r s R e s i d e n t i a l f i r e s p r i n k l e r s a r e r e q u i r e d i n a l l on e a n d t w o be a p p r o v e d p r i o r t o i n s t a l l a t i o n R e f e r e n c e 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 7 5 Attachment: Conditions of Approval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 35 of 58 Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Ri v e r s i d e C o u n t y Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 63 P h a s e d C o n s t r u c t i o n A c c e s s a n d W a t e r S u p p l y I f c o n s t r u c t i o n i s p h a s e d an a p p r o v e d p h a s i n g p l a n s h a l l b e a p p r o v e d b y t h e F i r e D e p a r t m e n t Ea c h p h a s e s h a l l p r o v i d e a p p r o v e d a c c e s s a n d w a t e r s u p p l y f o r f i r e pr o t e c t i o n p r i o r t o a n y c o n s t r u c t i o n R e f e r e n c e C F C a s a m e n d e d Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Ri v e r s i d e C o u n t y Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 64 Fi r e a n d L i f e S a f e t y R e q u i r e m e n t s wi l l b e a d d r e s s e d an d a m e n d e d a t t h e t i m e o f c o n s t r u c t i o n p l a n s u b m i t t a l Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Ri v e r s i d e C o u n t y Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 65 F i r e P r o t e c t i o n W a t e r S u p p l i e s F i r e F l o w M i n i m u m f i r e f l o w f o r t h e co n s t r u c t i o n o f a l l b u i l d i n g s i s r e q u ir e d p e r C F C A p p e n d i x B P r i o r t o bu i l d i n g p e r m i t i s s u a n c e f o r n e w c o n s t r uc t i o n t h e a p p l i c a n t s h a l l p r o v i d e do c u m e n t a t i o n t o t h e F i r e D e p a r t m e n t t o s h o w t h e r e e x i s t s a w a t e r sy s t e m c a p a b l e o f d e l i v e r i n g t h e r e q u i r e 50 7 3 a s a m e n d e d Wi l l S e r v e L e t t e r s f r o m t h e r e s p o n s i b l e w a t e r p u r v e y o r 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 7 6 Attachment: Conditions of Approval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 36 of 58 Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Ri v e r s i d e C o u n t y Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 66 F i r e P r o t e c t i o n W a t e r S u p p l i e s H y d r an t s T h e m i n i m u m n u m b e r o f f i r e hy d r a n t s re q u i r e d a s w e l l a s t h e l o c a t i o n a n d s p a c i n g o f f i r e h y d r a n t s sh a l l c o m p l y w i t h t h e CF C A p p e n d i x C F i r e h y d r a n t s s h a l l b e l o c a t e d n o mo r e t h a n 6 0 0 f e e t f r o m a l l po r t i o n s o f t h e e x t e r i o r o f t h e b u i l d i n g a l o n g an a p p r o v e d r o u t e f r o m a f i r e a p p a r a t u s ac c e s s r o a d W h e r e n e w w a t e r ma i n s a r e e x t e n d e d a l o n g s t r e e t s a n d h y d r a n t s a r e n o t n e e d e d f o r pr o t e c t i o n o f s t r u c t u r e s s t a n d a r d fi r e h y d r a n t s s h a l l b e p r o v i d e d a s sp a c i n g n o t t o e x c e e d 1 0 0 0 f e e t a l o n g s t r e e t s f o r t r a n s p o r t a t i o n h a z a r d s Th e s i z e a n d n u m b e r o f o u t l e t s r e q u i r e d f o r t h e a p p r o v e d f i r e h y d r a n t s a r e 4” x 2 F i n a l f i r e h y d r a n t l o c a t i o n s s h a l l b e d e t e r m i n e d d u r i n g t h e f i r e wa t e r p l a n r e v i e w R e f e r e n c e C F C a s a m e n d e d Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Ri v e r s i d e C o u n t y Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 67 T r a c t W a t e r P l a n s I f f i r e h y d r a n t s a r e r e q u i r e d t o b e i n s t a l l e d ap p l i c a n t d e v e l o p e r Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t f o r r e v i e w a n d Pl a n s s h a l l b e s i g n e d b y a r e g i s t e r e d c i v i l CF C a s a m e n d e d Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Ri v e r s i d e C o u n t y Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 68 F i r e D e p a r t m e n t A c c e s s F i r e a p p a r a t u s a c c e s s r o a d s s h a l l b e p r o v i d e d wi t h i n 3 0 0 ap p r o v e d b y t h e F i r e an u n o b s t r u c t e d w i d t h o f n o l e s s t h a n 2 4 f e e t D e a d ac c e s s r o a d s e x c e e d i n g 1 5 0 f e e t s h a l l p r o v i d e Th e m i n i m u m r e q u i r e d t u r n i n g r a d i u s o f a f i r e a p p a r a t u s fi r e a p p a r 75 0 0 0 l b s 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 7 7 Attachment: Conditions of Approval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 37 of 58 ex c e e d 2 5 p e r c e n t T h e a n g l e s o f a p p r o a c h a n d d e p a r t u r e f o r f i r e ap p a r a t u s a c c e s s r o a d s s h a l l b e a m a x i m u m o f 6 p e r c e n t g r a d e ch a n g e fo r 2 5 f e e t o f a p p r o a c h d e p a r t u r e R e f e r e n c e C F C a s a m e n d e d a n d Ri v e r s i d e C o u n t y F i r e D e p a r t m e n t P o l i c i e s a n d S t a n d a r d s Fi r e L a n e m a r k i n g I d e n t i f i c a t i o n a n d m a r k i n g o f f i r e l a n e s i n c l u d i n g c u r b de t a i l s a n d s i g n a g e s h a l l c o m p l y w i t h a l l R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y F i r e De p a r t m e n t S t a n d a r d s Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Ri v e r s i d e C o u n t y Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 69 F i r e D e p a r t m e n t A c c e s s T u r n A r o u n d D e a d e n d f i r e a p p a r a t u s a c c e s s ro a d s i n tu r n a r o u n d a t t h e t e r m i n u s an d 1 4 f e e t i n s i d e r a d i u s P a r a l l e l is a c c e p t a b l e p r o v i d e d t h e b u l b o u t s i d e fe e t I n l i e u o f a b u l b a h a m m e r h e a d t y p e t u r n a r o u n d wh e r e t h e t o p o f t h e T d i m e n s i o n i s 1 2 0 f e e t w i t h t h e s t e m i n t h e Ad d i t i o n De p a r t m e n t P o l i c i e s a n d S t a n d a r d s 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 7 8 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 38 of 58 Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Ri v e r s i d e C o u n t y Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 70 S e c o n d a r y A c c e s s A d d i t i o n a l f i r e a p p a r a t u s a c c e s s r o a d s b a s e d o n t h e po t e n t i a l fo r i m p a i r m e n t b y v e h i c l e c o n g e s t i o n c o n d i t i o n o f t e r r a i n cl i m a t i c c o n d i t i o n s an t i c i p a t e d m a g n i t u d e o f a p o t e n t i a l i n c i d e n t o r o t h e r fa c t o r s t h a t c o u l d l i m i t a c c e s s sh a l l b e r e q u i r e d b y t h e F i r e D e p a r t m e n t Se c o n d a r y a c c e s s f i r e a p p a r a t u s a c c e s s ro a d s s h a l l p r o v i d e i n d e p e n d e n t eg r e s s a c c e s s f o r t h e a r e a a s a p p r o v e d b y t h e F i r e De p a r t m e n t Se c o n d a r y a c c e s s f i r e a p p a r a t u s a c c e s s r o a d s s h a l l b e a s r e m o t e a s pr a c t i c a l f r o m t h e pr i m a r y f i r e a p p a r a t u s a c c e s s r o a d t o r e d u c e t h e po s s i b i l i t y t h a t b o t h ro u t e s w i l l b e o b s t r u c t e d b y a s i n g l e e m e r g e n c y Ad d i t i o n a l f i r e a p p a r a t u s a c c e s s ro a d s b a s e d o n t h e p o t e n t i a l f o r im p a i r m e n t b y v e h i c l e c o n g e s t i o n c o n d i t i o n o f t e r r a i n cl i m a t i c c o n d i t i o n s an t i c i p a t e d m a g n i t u d e o f a p o t e n t i a l i n c i d e n t o r o t h e r f a c t o r s t h a t co u l d li m i t a c c e s s m a y b e r e q u i r e d b y t h e F i r e D e p a r t m e n t R e f e r e n c e C F C a s am e n d e d a n d R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y F i r e D e p a r t m e n t P o l i c i e s a n d S t a n d a r d s Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s o f Ph a s e 1 Ri v e r s i d e C o u n t y Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 71 T r a f f i c C a l m i n g D e v i c e s R e q u e s t s f o r i n s t a l l a t i o n o f t r a f f i c c a l m i n g de s i g n s d e v i c e s ap p r o v e d b y t h e O f f i c e o f t h e th e C i v i l E n g i n e e r i n co m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 7 9 Attachment: Conditions ofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 39 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o A c c e p t a n c e o f P u b l i c I m p r o v e m e n t s P h a s e 1 a n d 2 Me t Pr i o r t o Ac c e p t a n c e o f Pu b l i c PR I O R t o l e v y c o l l e c t i o n a. th e f i r s t i n s t a l l m e n t i s p a i d t o t h e C i t y t h e D e v e l o p e r w i l l e i t h e r i. P a y a n a d v a n c e m e n t o f f u n d s f o r t h e m o n t h s an n e x a t i o n O R ii en o u g h f u n d s t o s u s t a i n m a i n t e n a n c e o r in s t a l l m e n t i s r e c e i v e d w h i c h e v e r i s f i r s t Pr i o r t o Ac c e p t a n c e o f Pu b l i c Im p r o v e m e n t s Sp e c i a l D i s t r i c t s 74 U p o n a c c e p t a n c e a n d C i t y t a k e o v e r d e v e l o p e r w i l l e n s u r e t h a t a mi n i m u m o f o n e y e a r w a r r a n t y i s i n p l a c e f o r l a n d s c a p e i r r i g a t i o n ma i n t e n a n c e o f t h e i m p r o v e m e n t s t a k e n o v e r Pr i o r t o Ac c e p t a n c e o f Pu b l i c Im p r o v e m e n t s Sp e c i a l D i s t r i c t s 75 P a r k s a n d a s s o c i a t e d f a c i l i t i e s s h a l l b e i n s p e c t e d b y a C e r t i f i e d A c c e s s Sp e c i a l i s t t h r o u g h t h e D i v i s i o n o f t h e S t a t e A r c h i t e c t wi t h a p p l i c a b l e s t a t e a n d f e d e r a l c o n s t r u c t i o n st a n d a r d s A c o p y o f t h e d i s a b i l i t y a c c e s s i n s p e c t i o n c e r t i f i c a t e a n d CA S p i n s p e c t i o n r e p o r t s h a l l b e p r o v i d e d t o t h e pa r k b y t h e C i t y 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 8 0 Attachment: Conditions of Approval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 40 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o t h e I s s u a n c e o f a C e r t i f i c a t e o f O c c u p a n c y P h a s e 1 Me t Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 Pl a n n i n g it e m s f o r t h e l a n d s c a p e a n d i r r i g a t i o n d e v e l o p m e n t a n d m a i n t e n a n c e 17 3 2 5 0 7 0 C e r t i f i c a t e o f C o m p l e t io n o f t h e D e v e l o p m e n t C o d e Th e i r r i g a t i o n s c h e d u l i n g p u r s u a n t t o S e c t i o n 1 7 3 2 5 0 8 0 Sc h e d u l i n g o f t h e D e v e l o p m e n t C o d e Th e L a n d s c a p e a n d I r r i g a t i o n M a i n t e n a n c e S c h e d u l e Se c t i o n 1 7 3 2 5 0 9 0 L a n d s c a p e a n d I r r i g a t i o n of t h e D e v e l o p m e n t C o d e a n d Th e I r r i g a t i o n A u d i t I r r i g a t i o n Su r v e y a n d I r r i g a t i o n W a t e r pu r s u a n t t o S e c t i o n 1 7 3 2 5 1 0 0 Ir r i g a t i o n W a t e r U s e A n a l y s i s o f t h e D e v e l o p m e n t C o d e Pu r s u a n t t o S e c t i o n 1 7 3 2 5 1 5 0 M a i n t e n a n c e o f t h e ma i n t a i n e d M a i n t e n a n c e s h a l l c o n s i s t o f r e g u l a r ar c h i t e c t u r a l f e a t u r e s Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 Pl a n n i n g Ti t l e 1 6 S u b d i v i s i o n C o d e th e a f i n a l m a p 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 8 1 Attachment: Conditions ofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 41 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o t h e I s s u a n c e o f a C e r t i f i c a t e o f O c c u p a n c y P h a s e 1 Me t Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 Pl a n n i n g th e V e s t i n g D a t e in s p e c t i o n a t t h e t i m e o f p e r m i t i s s u a n c e f o r e a c h h o m e of t h e r e f u n d s h a l l n o t e x c e e d t h e a c t u a l c o s t o f t h e p a r k l a n d a th e f e e s i n i t i a l l y p a i d N o c r o s s c a t e g o r y c r e d i t Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 Th e C i t y h a s a d o p t e d pa y m e n t o f t h e s e f e e s p r i o r Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 Bu i l d i n g S a f e t y 80 S p e c i f i c a d d r e s s e s f o r e a c h b u i l d i n g s h a l l b e p r o v i d e d t o m a k e s u c h nu m b e r p l a i n l y v i s i b l e f r o m t h e p u b l i c st r e e t a v e n u e c o u r t o r a l l e y u p o n wh i c h p r o p e r t y f r o n t s a n d s h a l l b e c o n t r a s t i n g c o l o r a n d b a c k g r o u n d Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 En g i n e e r i n g 81 T h e f o l l o w i n g i t e m s n e e d t o b e a p p r o v e d a. A p p r o v e d W D I D N o b. G e o t e c h n i c a l R e p o r t f o r r e f e r e n c e 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 8 2 Attachment: Conditions of Approval ( ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 42 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o t h e I s s u a n c e o f a C e r t i f i c a t e o f O c c u p a n c y P h a s e 1 Me t d. H y d r o l o g y a n d H y d r a u l i c A n a l y s i s e. F i n a l W Q M P f o r r e f e r e n c e i n c l u d i n g W D I D N o Th e d e s i g n s h a l l c o m p l y w i t h R C F C D de v e l o p m e n t s Ph a s e 1 an d P G 6 4 fo o t p a r k w a y c o n s i s t i n g o f l a n d s c a p i n g a 6 Ca l t r a n s s t a n d a r d s A 2 4 pa r k i n g s h a l l b e r e s t r i c t e d t o o n e s i d e o f t h e s t r e e t Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 th as p h a l t p a v i n g u s i n g T I o f 5 5 a n d P G 6 4 bo t h s i d e s o f c e n t e r l i n e a 1 0 f o o t p a r k w a y c o n Ja c i n t o C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e a n d C a l t r a n s s t a n d a r d s A 2 4 sh a l l b e r e s t r i c t e d t o o n e s i d e o f t h e s t r e e t 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 8 3 Attachment: Conditions ofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 43 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o t h e I s s u a n c e o f a C e r t i f i c a t e o f O c c u p a n c y P h a s e 1 Me t Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 fo r 4 0 f e e t a s p h a l t p a v i n g u s i n g T I o f 5 5 a n d P G 6 4 at 2 0 f e e t o n b o t h s i d e s o f c e n t e r l i n e a 2 0 la n d s c a p i n g a 6 pe r C i t y o f S a n J a c i n t o C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e a n d C a l t r a n s s t a n d a r d s Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 Se v e n t h S t r e e t s h a l l b e i m p r o v e d t o p r o v i d e f o r a 5 0 ri g h t o f w a y a s p h a l t p a v i n g u s i n g a T I o f 9 0 a n d P G 7 0 1 0 8 Ci t y o f S a n J a c i n t o T r a i l s M a s t e r P l a n a n d a n 1 8 co n s i s t i n g o f l a n d s c a p i n g a 6 Ca l t r a n s s t a n d a r d s 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 8 4 Attachment: Conditions ofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 44 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o t h e I s s u a n c e o f a C e r t i f i c a t e o f O c c u p a n c y P h a s e 1 Me t Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 Ca w s t o n A v e n u e s h a l l b e i m p r o v e d t o p r o v i d e f o r a 5 0 ri g h t o f w a y a s p h a l t p a v i n g u s i n g a T I o f 9 0 a n d P G 7 0 1 0 8 Ci t y o f S a n J a c i n t o T r a i l s M a s t e r P l a n a n d a n 1 8 f o o t w i d e p a r k w a y co n s i s t i n g o f l a n d s c a p i n g a 6 f o o t si d e w a l k a n d s t r e e t l i g h t s s u b j e c t t o ph o t o m e t r i c a n a l y s i s p e r C i t y o f S a n J a c i n t o C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e a n d Ca l t r a n s s t a n d a r d s Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 wa s a d o p t e d b y t h e C i t y o f S a n J a c i n t o p u r s u a n t t o O r d i n a n c e 1 3 su b j e c t t o f e e s f o r s a i d d r a i n a g e a r e to O r d i n a n c e 1 3 0 1 p a y m e n t o f t h e d r a i n a g e f e e s th e 1 s t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t f o r t h e ph a s e a n d t h a t t h e p r o p e r t y o th e f e e r e q u i r e d a t t h e r a t e i n e f f e c t a t t h e Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 En g i n e e r i n g 88 A l l r e s i d e n t i a l d r i v e w a y s s h a l l b e c o n s t r u c t e d p e r C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e St a n d a r d N o 2 0 7 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 8 5 Attachment: Conditions of Approval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 45 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o t h e I s s u a n c e o f a C e r t i f i c a t e o f O c c u p a n c y P h a s e 1 Me t Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 En g i n e e r i n g 89 Al l s i d e w a l k s s h a l l c o m p l y w i t h Ri v e r s i d e C o u n t y S t a n d a r d 4 0 1 Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 En g i n e e r i n g 90 C u r b r a m p s s h a l l i n c l u d e t r u n c a t e d d o m e s p e r R i v e r s i d e C o u n t y S t a n d a r d 40 3 Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 an d d e s i g n g u i d e l i n e s de v e l o p e r p u r p o s e s t o p u m p n u i s a n c e f l o w s t o a b u b b l e Se v e n t h S t r e e t r i g h t o f wa t e r w o u l d f l o w t h r o u g h t h e g u t t e r t o a ma i n t e n a n c e p r i o r de v e l o p m e n t 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 8 6 Attachment: Conditions of Approval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 46 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o t h e I s s u a n c e o f a C e r t i f i c a t e o f O c c u p a n c y P h a s e 1 Me t Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 EM W D w a t e r s e r v i c e a r e a W a t e r a n d s e w e de s i g n e d a n d i n s t a l l e d p e r E M W D S t a n d a r d s Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 un d e r g r o u n d e d P r o v i d e a n u n d e r g r o u n d i n g o f u t i l i co n f o r m a n c e Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 En g i n e e r i n g 94 T h e d e v e l o p e r p r o p e r t y o w n e r s h a l l p r o v id e f o r u t i l i t y t r e n c h s u r f a c e r e p a i r as d i r e c t e d b y t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r i f a p p l i c a b l e Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 Sp e c i a l D i s t r i c t s 95 D e v e l o p m e n t m u s t c o m p l y w i t h S t o r m W a t e r B a s i n P u m p S p e c i f i c a t i o n s an d S t a n d a r d s P r i v a t e l y m a i n t a i n e d s t o r m w a t e r a n d w a t e r q u a l i t y s y s t e m s wi l l b e r e q u i r e d t o s u b m i t a n I r r e v o c a b l e O f f e r o f D e d i c a t i o n f o r t h e b a s i n lo t Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 Sp e c i a l D i s t r i c t s 96 De v e l o p m e n t m u s t c o m p l y w i t h L a n d s c a p e a n d I r r i g a t i o n Gu i d e l i n e s 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 8 7 Attachment: Conditions of Approval ( Chacon Farms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 47 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o t h e I s s u a n c e o f a C e r t i f i c a t e o f O c c u p a n c y P h a s e 1 Me t Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 Sp e c i a l D i s t r i c t s 97 L a n d s c a p e i m p r o v e m e n t s s h a l l i n c l u d e i r r i g a t i o n m e t e r s a n d b a c k f l o w de v i c e s w i t h t a m p e r i n g p r e v e n t i v e c a g e e x c l u s i v e f o r r i g h t o f la n d s c a p i n g R i g h t o f pr o p e r t y b y f o r m o r m o w c u r b o r o t h e r a p p r o v e d m a t e r i a l s Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 co n t r o l s y s t e m w i t h s e p a r a t e e l e c t r ic m e t e r e x c l u s i v e f o r r i g h t o f la n d s c a p i n g Ca l ce r t i f i e d b y C a l S e n s e 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 8 8 Attachment: Conditions ofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 48 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f B u i l d i n g P e r m i t s P h a s e 2 Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s Pl a n n i n g re q u i r e d t o b e c o m p l e t e d Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s Pl a n n i n g an d t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r Pr i o r Is s u a n c e Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s Ph a s e 2 Pl a n n i n g al l r e q u i r e d s e t b a c k s m e a s u r e d f r o m t h e p r o p e r t y l i n e s a. be n o l e s s t h a n t w e n t y 2 0 f e e t b. ri g h t o f Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e o f Bu i l d i n g Pe r m i t s Pl a n n i n g re l e v a n t s e c t i o n s o f t h e D e v e l o p m e n t C o d e co n s i s t o f a. fr o m p r o p e r t y l i n e s p a v e d a r e a s s l o p e s e t c 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 8 9 Attachment: Conditions of Approval ( ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 49 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f B u i l d i n g P e r m i t s P h a s e 2 c. Ar c h i t e c t u r a l e l e v a t i o n s i n c o l o r o f a l l s i d e s d. Ty p i c a l f r o n t y a r d l a n d s c a p i n g e. En t r y m o n u m e n t a t i o n a n d p a r k w a y l a n d s c a p e t r e a t m e n t s f. ar o u n d t h e p e r i m e t e r o f t h e p r o j e c t a n d i n t e r i o r f e n c i n g a n d g. C o m m o n m a i l b o x a r c h i t e c t u r a l t r e a t m e n t h. Av e n u e a n d 7 th St r e e t s h a l l b e e n h a n c e d 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 9 0 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 50 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f B u i l d i n g P e r m i t s P h a s e 2 Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e Pl a n n i n g la n d s c a p e a r c h i t e c t i n c o n f o r m a n c e w i t h C h a p t e r 1 7 3 2 5 re v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l b y t h e C i t y L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t P l a n s s h o u l d is s u a n c e T h e L a n d s c a p e a n d I r r i g a t i o n S u b m i t t a l P a c k a g e in c l u d e a. A c o m p l e t e d a p p l i c a t i o n p a c k e t p r o v i d e d b y t h e C i t y b. pe r S t a t e g u i d e l i n e s c. T h e s o i l s m a n a g e m e n t r e p o r t d. T h e l a n d s c a p e d e s i g n p l a n e. T h e i r r i g a t i o n d e s i g n p l a n f. T h e g r a d i n g p l a n Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e Pl a n n i n g a. T h e d e v e l o p e r w i l l w o r k w i t h b. si m i l a r i n c o l o r m a t e r i a l p i l a s t e r s i z e a n d c a p s 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 9 1 Attachment: Conditions ofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 51 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o I s s u a n c e o f B u i l d i n g P e r m i t s P h a s e 2 Pr i o r t o Is s u a n c e Pl a n n i n g a. T h e d e v e l o p e r w i l l w o r k w i t h b. si m i l a r i n c o l o r m a t e r i a l p i l a s t e r s i z e a n d c a p s 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 9 2 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 52 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o t h e I s s u a n c e o f a C e r t i f i c a t e o f O c c u p a n c y P h a s e 2 Me t Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 2 Pl a n n i n g ma i n t e n a n c e x Th e s i g n e d L a n d s c a p e C e r t i f i c a t e o f C o m p l e t i o n p u r s u a n t t o Se c t i o n 1 7 3 2 5 0 7 0 De v e l o p m e n t C o d e x Th e i r r i g a t i o n s c h e d u l i n g p u r s u a n t t o S e c t i o n 1 7 3 2 5 0 8 0 Ir r i g a t i o n S c h e d u l i n g o f t h e D e v e l o p m e n t C o d e x Th e L a n d s c a p e a n d I r r i g a t i o n M a i n t e n a n c e S c h e d u l e to S e c t i o n 1 7 3 2 5 0 9 0 L a n d s c a p e a n d I r r i g a t i o n Sc h e d u l e o f t h e D e v e l o p m e n t C o d e a n d x Th e I r r i g a t i o n A u d i t I r r i g a t i o n S u r v e y a n d I r r i g a t i o n W a t e r An a l y s i s p u r s u a n t t o S e c t i o n 1 7 3 2 5 1 0 0 De v e l o p m e n t C o d e Pu r s u a n t t o S e c t i o n 1 7 3 2 5 1 5 0 M a i n t e n a n c e o f sy s t e m s s h a l l b e c o n t i n u a l l y m a i n t a i n e d M a i n t e n a n c e co n s i s t o f r e g u l a r 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 9 3 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 53 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o t h e I s s u a n c e o f a C e r t i f i c a t e o f O c c u p a n c y P h a s e 2 Me t Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 2 Pl a n n i n g ef f e c t o n t h e V e s t i n g D a t e oc c u p a n c y o r f i n a l i n s p e c t i o n ho m e th e a c t u a l c o s t o f t h e p a r k l a n d a pa i d N o c r o s s c a t e g o r y c r e d i t Ph a s e 2 Th e C i t y h a s Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n U n i f o r m sh a l l b e s u b j e c t t o p a y m e n t o f t h e s e f e e s p r i o r ba c k g r o u n d 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 9 4 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 54 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o t h e I s s u a n c e o f a C e r t i f i c a t e o f O c c u p a n c y P h a s e 2 Me t Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 2 Co n s t r u c t a l l i n t e r i o r s t r e e t s w i t h i n P h a s e 2 u s i n g T I o f 5 5 a n d P G 6 4 si d e s o f c e n t e r l i n e a n 8 si d e w a l k a n d s Sa n J a c i n t o C o u n t y o f R i v e r s i d e a n d C a l t r a n s s t a n d a r d s A 2 4 Ph a s e 2 Es p l a n a d e s h a l l b e i m p r o v e d t o p r o v i d e f o r a 7 3 ri g h t o f w a y a s p h a l t p a v i n g u s i n g a T I o f 9 5 a n d P G 7 0 1 0 8 cu r b a n d g u t t e r 3 8 f e e t n o r t h o f c e n t e r l i n e a C l a s s I M u l t i pe r t h e C i t y o f S a n J a c i n t o T r a i l s M a s t e r P l a n a n d a n 3 5 Ca l t r a n s s t a n d a r d s Sa n d e r s o n A v e n u e w i t h t w o m o r e l a n e s a n d a s i d e w a l k S t r e e t sh a l l c o o r d i n a t e w i t h t h e C i t y o n t h e i n s t a l l a t i o n o f i m p r o v e m e n t s 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 9 5 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 55 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o t h e I s s u a n c e o f a C e r t i f i c a t e o f O c c u p a n c y P h a s e 2 Me t Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 2 En g i n e e r i n g 11 2 T h e d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r o v i d e w a t e r an d s e w e r s e r v i c e s t o e a c h l o t i n ac c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s o f t h e a p p r o p r i a t e u t i l i t y p u r v e y o r Th i s d e v e l o p m e n t i s w i t h i n t h e C i t y o f S a n J a c i n t o s e w e r s e r v i c e a r e a an d t h e E M W D w a t e r s e r v i c e a r e a W a t e r a n d s e w e Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 2 E be u n d e r g r o u n d e d P r o v i d e a n u n d e r g r o u n d i n g o f u t i l i Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 2 En g i n e e r i n g 11 4 T h e d e v e l o p e r p r o p e r t y o w n e r s h a l l p r o v i d e f o r u t i l i t y t r e n c h s u r f a c e re p a i r a s d i r e c t e d b y t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r i f a p p l i c a b l e Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 1 En g i n e e r i n g 11 5 A an d C o t t o n w o o d A v e n u e 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 9 6 Attachment: Conditions of Approval ( ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 56 of 58 Ti m i n g Re s p o n s i b l e De p a r t m e n t Pr i o r t o t h e I s s u a n c e o f a C e r t i f i c a t e o f O c c u p a n c y P h a s e 2 Me t Pr i o r t o t h e Is s u a n c e o f a Ce r t i f i c a t e o f Oc c u p a n c y o f Ph a s e 2 a. a p p r o v e d W D I D N o b. G e o t e c h n i c a l R e p o r t f o r r e f e r e n c e c. S t o r m D r a i n I m p r o v e m e n t P l a n s d. H y d r o l o g y a n d H y d r a u l i c A n a l y s i s e. F i n a l W Q M P f o r r e f e r e n c e i n c l u d i n g W D I D N o Th e d e s i g n s h a l l c o m p l y w i t h R C F C D re c e n t Ti m i n g Op e r a t i o n a l Op e r a t i o n a l Pl a n n i n g sh i e l d e d o r m o d i f i e d a n d l o c a t e d s o a s t o e l i m i n a t e il l u m i n a t i o n o r g l a r e b e y o n d t h e p r o p e r t y l i n e o r u p w a r d i n t o t h e Op e r a t i o n a l Pl a n n i n g of w e e d s t r a s h a n d d e b r i s 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 9 7 Attachment: Conditions of Approval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 57 of 58 Ti m i n g Op e r a t i o n a l On g o i n g Pl a n n i n g an y b u i l d i n g s h a l l o c c u r b e t w e e n t h e h o u r s o f s e v e n a m a n d p. m o n w e e k d a y s a n d S a t u r d a y s a n d b e t w e e n n i n e a m a n d s i x sh o w i n g o f s u f f i c i e n t n e e d d u e t o h o t o r i n c l e m e n t w e a t h e r o r t h e un u s u a l a n d c o m p e l l i n g n a t u r e Al l c o n s t r u c t i o n e q u i p m e n t s h a l l b e m u f f l e d a n d o r s u r r o u n d e d On g o i n g P l a n n i n g co n s t r u c t i o n m i n i m i z a t i o n m e a s u r e s a r e l i s t e d b e l o w ma t e r i a l s c o n t r o l d e w a t e r i n g o r d i v e r s i o n s t r u c t u r e s co n s t r u c t i o n 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 9 8 Attachment: Conditions ofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Ge n e r a l N o t e s R e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Ge n e r a l P l a n A m e n d m e n t C h a n g e o f Z o n e P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t Pe r m i t a n d T e n t a t i v e T r a c t M a p 3 9 0 7 6 St a f f R e c o m m e n d e d C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l Pa g e 58 of 58 Ti m i n g Op e r a t i o n a l cl e a r i n g w i l l b e a v o i d e d d u r i n g s p e c i e s a c t i v e b r e e d i n g s e a s o n de f i n e d a s M a r c h 1 t o J u n e 3 0 5. 1 c Pa c k e t P g 9 9 Attachment: ConditionsofApproval (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) CA W S T O N A V E N U E SE E S H E E T 3 SE E S H E E T 4 SE E S H E E T 2 EA S E M E N T N O T E S AN C E R O A D S S T R E E T K M O D I F I E D L O C A L TY P I C A L S T R E E T S E C T I O N T. I 5 5 PR I V A T E S T R E E T S 4, 1 6 3 4, 1 6 3 4, 1 6 3 4, 1 6 3 4, 1 8 5 4, 1 4 0 4, 1 4 7 4, 0 9 1 4, 6 4 3 4, 5 4 5 4, 6 3 7 5, 1 2 0 5, 1 1 9 5, 1 1 9 5, 1 1 9 5, 1 1 9 5, 1 1 9 5, 1 2 0 4, 8 1 1 4, 6 9 6 5, 1 7 3 5, 1 7 3 5, 1 7 3 5, 1 7 3 5, 1 7 3 5, 1 7 3 5, 1 7 3 4, 6 3 8 4, 5 4 5 4, 6 4 3 4, 7 8 0 4, 3 2 8 4, 3 2 7 4, 3 2 9 4, 1 4 3 4, 1 6 3 4, 5 4 4 4, 7 8 0 4, 1 6 3 4, 1 6 3 16 1 5, 3 2 4 16 2 5, 3 2 4 16 3 5, 3 2 4 16 4 5, 1 4 3 16 5 4, 9 7 7 16 6 5, 5 4 2 16 7 5, 8 7 5 16 8 7, 0 9 9 16 9 5, 0 1 9 17 0 5, 7 4 1 17 1 4, 8 8 3 17 2 5, 0 7 3 17 3 5, 0 8 8 17 4 5, 0 8 8 17 5 5, 0 8 8 17 6 5, 0 8 8 17 7 4, 6 0 8 17 8 5, 0 2 9 17 9 5, 5 0 6 18 0 5, 5 0 6 18 1 5, 5 0 6 18 2 5, 5 0 6 18 3 5, 5 0 6 18 4 5, 5 0 6 18 5 5, 0 3 7 18 6 4, 3 6 1 18 7 4, 1 6 3 18 8 4, 3 4 3 18 9 4, 3 4 3 19 0 4, 3 4 3 19 1 4, 1 6 3 19 2 4, 1 6 3 19 3 4, 1 6 3 19 4 4, 1 6 3 19 5 4, 4 0 1 19 6 4, 2 4 1 19 7 4, 1 6 3 19 8 4, 1 6 3 19 9 4, 1 4 6 20 0 3, 7 7 3 21 1 4, 5 8 7 21 2 4, 7 0 9 21 3 4, 8 0 2 21 4 4, 6 3 8 21 5 4, 6 3 8 21 6 4, 8 7 6 21 7 4, 8 7 6 21 8 4, 8 7 5 21 9 4, 8 7 5 22 0 4, 7 0 0 22 1 4, 7 3 9 22 2 4, 6 3 6 22 3 4, 6 3 5 22 4 4, 6 3 6 22 5 4, 6 3 7 22 6 4, 6 3 7 22 7 4, 6 3 8 22 8 4, 6 3 5 22 9 4, 7 5 2 23 0 4, 9 5 6 23 1 4, 6 3 3 23 2 4, 6 3 3 23 3 4, 6 3 4 23 4 4, 5 8 6 23 5 4, 6 3 5 23 6 4, 6 3 6 23 7 4, 6 3 6 23 8 4, 6 3 6 23 9 4, 6 3 6 24 0 4, 7 3 9 24 1 4, 8 4 2 24 2 4, 8 4 2 24 3 4, 8 4 2 24 4 4, 7 3 9 24 5 4, 6 3 6 24 6 4, 8 8 4 24 7 4, 8 0 2 24 8 4, 6 4 5 24 9 4, 6 4 5 25 0 4, 8 8 3 26 1 4, 6 4 5 26 2 4, 8 4 3 26 3 4, 8 8 3 26 4 5, 0 8 9 26 5 4, 8 8 3 26 6 4, 8 8 3 26 7 4, 8 8 3 26 8 4, 6 4 5 26 9 4, 6 4 5 27 0 4, 8 0 2 27 1 5, 5 3 8 27 2 6, 2 6 9 27 3 6, 2 6 8 27 4 6, 2 6 9 27 5 6, 2 6 9 27 6 5, 4 3 2 27 7 5, 1 8 1 27 8 6, 0 1 9 27 9 6, 0 1 9 28 0 6, 0 1 9 28 1 6, 0 1 9 28 2 6, 0 1 9 28 3 5, 0 8 0 28 4 5, 2 8 5 28 5 6, 0 1 9 28 6 6, 0 1 9 28 7 6, 0 1 9 28 8 6, 0 1 9 28 9 6, 0 1 9 29 0 5, 1 8 1 29 1 5, 4 3 2 29 2 6, 2 6 9 29 3 6, 2 6 9 29 4 6, 2 6 9 29 5 6, 2 6 9 29 6 5, 3 2 9 29 7 5, 4 4 9 29 8 6, 1 7 9 29 9 6, 1 7 9 30 0 6, 1 7 9 2 8>= UYU 6 5 YRUXS YUQ?TXW?WSSP 9#M.6 0 F 9'*-G YTYDSSYDQYWW M/9'*-D 6 0 QYVX 79?<5$/SPTS 5)YRVUQ YTYDSSYDQYWW M/9'*-D D D 9'*-L 5'/$)"E 90 8:< 5.1.e Packet Pg. 105 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Q?1 SYPWV R?1 9 5)/9 6 7./*)6 7 W 6 S?3*9<RTUQ 8+-7 9<YRUXR T?6 F 5-G L F 9 7 9 G U?6 1 7 9 F G< 5-.5 F RPQRG?7 9 F G FR?P W?P 7 G<5-.5 9 F RPRRG? V?1 9<FA BG 6 8$(9 WU?WP 6 7$/#5+TQY D 9 5 5-6 5)$/9 FA BG?6 7*5'5 5 5-8+6 6 7$'' 5-5 5-5'/$+'9 5 5-5-7 5 9C./*-(7 7 5/$'$/9 6 6 6 5 7 W 7./*)6 6 6 5-5$S 2-$5/L 5.0!0*)9 06 6 U Y 5-5$QQ 8#$E 5-QT 5$QU 8#$E 5-QW 8#$E 06 QX 8#$E QY 8#$E 3)"RP 5.1.e Packet Pg. 106 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Q?6 7$/#$)9 7$/#5$- 5(6$9 6 7#9 6 7$''6$5$8$./.7 5)9 6 5(9? R?5$-6$)". 5 9 5-9 9<5)/ 9 9 7$/#QW?VVP?PWP F 5 G<6 5 6 6 5 5$' 5 S?6 5'7.> RPRV RPRV 5 5 9 RPRW 9 RPSQ T?5./7 9 6 QW?VRP?PWP E 6 U?6 C.5'$)"7$/#6 SYPWV 5+6 6 5'6 8$(6 6 7#5 8+ 6 6 9 6 9 7)9 7)@.5 F.GD$)D$)/ A 5$-6$)". 5 9 5-9 9< 5)/9 9 7$/# QW?VVP?PWP F 5 G<6 5 6 6 5 5$'5 B 5.1.e Packet Pg. 107 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 6 5 7) 7$/#$)5+9 9 5 5-7$/#$)6 B V? L 7$/#Q<8#$ 7$/#S<8#$ 7$/#T<8#$ W?5$ K 5$6$ 5$5-9 7$/#$) 6 7$/#5--*5)97$5$7 6 5./9 9 J. 5)QW?SRU 5(<7#6 5$97$5$7$''6$ 5$ 6 6 5)F D G 6 6 6 9 5'/$+' 6 F G 6 6 K 5.1.e Packet Pg. 108 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 6 6 7$/#9 D,5 9 5)$/9 7$/#9 6 5.$)" 9@.5/5$-6 5 7 6 1 6$/9? 1 7 W 6 1 6 9+$6 1 6$6 5 5'/$+' 5 5- 1 7$/#5-+*.5. 9 o 1 5)$/9 6$ TQY 5)$/.7$/#6 9 D 9 59 6 6$6 9 5.$)"9' 9*5/.<9 5$/7$)"5' @.5/$*)5.$)" 7*-& *-7$''5/5/6 5 9?@ TQY 5)$/.@.5.$)"5++'9<7$''9@. 5.$)"9 7$''5/9@.5)( 7$''T<UPP 5 X<VRR 5 1 5-9 9 5.7$/#$) 6 1 6 7$''7$/#8$./$)"5/5-5.6$9< 6 5 6$7 o 1 5--*5)9 8$./$)" 5'/5-5.9 7 W/# 7./*)6 5 8$./$)"D 9 5.7 7#$7$''5 UV?W 8 D5.6 QSP?W D 9 6 6$VXV D 9 9 5/#< 6 5 5'/5-5.7#$7$/#$)5-$. 5.1.e Packet Pg. 109 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 9 7$''5- 6 D'$ 9'5'/5-9 9 5-5'/5-9?A B 7$'' 5"#5.5.5- 9'5"#*5/5)$/9?5-7$''6 5)$/9 7*-&7$/#$) 8/<9 9 7$/# 6 9<6 7$''9 7$/#@.5)$/9 1 7$''5 6 6 5+ 5 9 8 F 6 9 5 5- 5)$/$8 5 5-5 9 5- 9 5)/.6 6 5/$*). 9 H 5 I< A"-B G 7$.5-9+$ 6 o 1 7$''5)$,5 5"# A B 5'/5-9?5- 5 5-7$/#$)5)$/9 7$'' 7$/#5)$/9@.5'/5-5-7$'' 5$'/5.9'5.$)"5 9 5 5 6 9 6 7$''7$/#*5/6$8/ 5)$/9 9'8/6$5 7$'' 6$.5 5)$/9?9< 5)$/9 5-$)"6$5)$/9 7 7$''5/6 9' 5)$/9 1 6 5- 5 9<7 o 1 5)$/9 5 9 7$/#5 5 9<7$'' 6$9*5/9 5- 9.$6$/9 7 5-5)$/9 9 7*-& 7$''6$5(5.5)$/$ 1 D.$/5'F 6 5'G 6 5-5++- 5-6 5 7#7*5'9 9 7$/# 5(7$R F 7 5.1.e Packet Pg. 110 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 G= o 1 @.D 7*-&5"# 5/7$'' 6$9 6 9 6$/9 7$/#$) 7$''6 5'/$D 6 5 5"# 7$''5/5 6$9 9 9? 1 5 5 9< 5(./6 o 1 7$/#8$(9 WU?WP 7 7./*)6 5 6 5 5/#6 5--*5)9 8/5-5'/5-5. 6$9 6$9 5/F G WT<8$(9 S?Y 5/#WY<8$(9 U?U 1 5 5 6$8$./<7$''6$ 7$/#6 6 6 6 6 7$''5'/5 5 6$ 6$9 5 9<7 o 1 8$(9 P?V F QRD($)5/7 G< 6 9 F G 6$@.D 5 6$6 7$/#$)D 6$5.6 9$)"5.5'5.9 5+F+-*6$ 7$/#$) 5/TT 5.G?5--*5)9 W/# 7./*)6 5 6 5 5/#? 5--*5)7$''9@. 7)5'5-/#7$/# 7*-&5"# 7#$ 1 6 7$''6 5 6 5--*5)9 7 5. o 1 7$/#9 5.5--*5)9 8$./$)"D 9 9 7 6 6 7$''TQY 9 7$/#$)WU?WP 6$8$($/9 5)$/9 5-5 FP?S G<5$/:FP?W G<9 FP?W G< FP?Y G 7./*)9 FQ?S G? 5.1.e Packet Pg. 111 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 5)$/9 5/ 5-5$ 9 5$/: 9 7$/#8$./$)"5--*5)5. 8 5--9 DRT 5$- QTV<SVQ?VP 5 7 7 6 6 5 7./*)6 5 W 7 6 5 7./*)6 5 W 7 7 6 5 7./*)6 5 W 6 7$/#9 D,5 9 5)$/9 7$/#9 6 5.$)" 5.1.e Packet Pg. 112 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 5 9 5 6$.$*).5)5- 5'6$/$5./6 6$6 7$/#$)6$6$.5 9 9 6$-*)( Q?6 6 7$/#$)5)$/9 9 7$/# 6 7> Q 5$- F($)$(5(G>S<WQW 5 F($)$(5(G>TU F($)$(5(G>RU F($)$(5(G>VP 6 E 5 5-F(8$(5(G>VP\ 6 E 6$*5.F(8$(5(G>WP\ F($)$(5(G>QP F($)$(5(G>RP F($)$(5(G>T F($)$(5(G>U F($)$(5(G>QP 7$/#F($)$(5(G>QP 5$' 5$'F(8$(5(G>SU 5$'F(8$(5(G>T<UPP 5 5(F(8$(5(G>7* 7 7*QPP\ F(8$(5(G>R>Q R?5$ 5)$/9 6$9' 8#$6 7.6 5)$/9 7$/# 5.1.e Packet Pg. 113 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 5$'6 5)$/9 7$/#5(S<WQW 8#$8#$7$'' 5-$)"9@.6$7 6 7#$5 5-5$-6 9 7$/#$)6 9 5.A 5-7 B 6 6 5 6$.5 9 5-6 6$.5 9 7$/#$)5)$/9 9 7$/#7$)"5$ Q?5(FSG 5-6 FSG 5$- 5)$/9? R?6 9'8/9 S?5(5$-Q? 5.1.e Packet Pg. 114 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 5-5$6 9 5)$/9@.5- 5$ 5 5$' 5$6 A+B D 8/ 5'5.8+5$'7$'' 5-5$'5 9 5$7#$'9$)" 6$/9 6 5.$)"59 8+ Q? 5-5$8+-9 5-9' 9'9 5'9 7$/#9' 5(5-5-9'5./ 9 5)$/9 6$.5 9 9 9'5$7 C#$./*-$9'9 9'6$9'@.5-6$.5 9 9 5- 9'5)$/9? 5-9'5'7$/# 5 9'5'6 9 9 5.9'5$5-9? 5'/$+'5-9'5'6 5-7$)7.< R? 5$'7*9 7 5$' 6 5.5'5$'@.6$.$6 6 5 6 5$' S? 6$.5 @.5'7 7$/#5$'5$'@.5' 7$/# 5 5-9'6 6 5.1.e Packet Pg. 115 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 6 9 6 9 5 6 9 5.8/<7# 5-9' 5-9'5./ 9+$9 5.9' D 5./$ 5'5)*5 6 T? 6 6 5"#*5/5)$/9<5' 5./6 9'5- 6 9 7 7# 9'5 5/5.# D5+7$)" 7 7$)7 9' 7$)7 5. 5-5-5 6 F$)5 G 9 5 5$' 6$.5 9 7# 5-9' 5 6$.5 U?7. 7 5-9 6$.5 5"# 7$/#5-9' 5-7$)7 7$/#5-9' 5//5$-7 6 7#5.5// 7$)7 5-9' 7 5.6 5.5$/9? 7.C*-7$/#6 6 V?5$' 9 8/5-8/5-5$'5-5"#*5/ 5)$/9?5$' 5.1.e Packet Pg. 116 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 5-9'6$6 5'5 9 7#$'6 9 8/ 5'5.5-5 6 9 5-9' 5'<7$/#5-9' 6 5 8/5. 8/<7$/#5-6 6*$5. 5'/$+'5$' W?6 6 5 7 9 5'5-9 7$/# 6 6 7$)7 8 5- X? 5"#*5/9' 5- 5/8/5)9 5-5 5/$*)?5 5-5 7 5 7)7 F*-5.$)"A 5/D* B 9 5($)5)8/5-97 G 7 5 5($)5.? 5/8/5-5. 5($)5 9? 5$+( 5$+(5 6 6 5 6$5)/9 5./6 9 7 5.1.e Packet Pg. 117 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 5 5.1.e Packet Pg. 118 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Pl an oo an s Wr i t t e n C o l o r S c h e m e s Co l o r B o a r d s A S p a n i s h Co l o r B o a r d s B P r a i r i e Co l o r B o a r d s C F a r m h o A- 3 3 A- 3 4 A- 3 5 A- 3 6 4'MI 4' 0 MI N 4' 0 MI N 4' 0 MI N 4' 0 MI N 45 0 4 5 0 4 5 0 29'-0" 29'-0" 29'-0" Re f e r t o l a n d s c a p e d r a w i n g s f o r w a l l t r e e a n d s h r u b l o c a t K e v i n L C r o o k A r c h i t e c t I n c 02 5 A S P A N I S H S T Y L E a n d s h r u b l o c a t 20'- 0x20 0 CLEAR 20 1 20 2 x GA R A G E LINEN CO A T S 10 0 10 1 x BE D R M 4 EN T R Y HA L L HA L L BA T H 2 HA L L LA U 10 0 10 0 x BE D R M 2 KI T C H E N PA N T R Y 19 0 22 2 x GR E A T R M 11 1 0 14 0 x W. I C 14 7 L F LINEN PR I M B A T H 60'-0" 60'-0" Re f e r t o l a n d s c a p e d r a w i n g s f o r w a l l t r e e a n d s h r u b l o c a t K e v i n L C r o o k A r c h i t e c t I n c 02 5 A S P A N I S H S T Y L El a n d s h r u b l o c a t 19 4 14 6 x PR I M B E D R M BA T H 2 20'- 0x200 CLEAR 20 1 20 2 x GA R A G E PO R KI T C H E N PA N T R Y 11 0 17 2 x DI N I N G 37 0 43'-0" Re f e r t o l a n d s c a p e d r a w i n g s f o r w a l l t r e e a n d s h r u b l o c a t K e v i n L C r o o k A r c h i t e c t I n c 02 5 A S P A N I S H S T Y L El ee a n d s h r u b l o c a t 17 6 14 0 x PR I M B E D R M LINEN LA U 20'- 0x200CLEAR 20 1 0 20 1 x GA R A G E 17 6 11 7 x DI N I N G CO A T S KI T C H E N PA N T R Y 43'-0" Re f e r t o l a n d s c a p e d r a w i n g s f o r w a l l t r e e a n d s h r u b l o c a t K e v i n L C r o o k A r c h i t e c t I n c 02 5 A S P A N I S H S T Y L E a n d s h r u b l o c a t 14 6 15 1 0 x PR I M B E D R M 11 4 15 1 1 x LO F T LI N E N LA U 10 0 11 3 x DI N I N G KI T C H E N PA N T R Y 20'- 0x20 0CLEAR 20 1 20 1 x GA R A G E E 45'-0" Re f e r t o l a n d s c a p e d r a w i n g s f o r w a l l t r e e a n d s h r u b l o c a t K e v i n L C r o o k A r c h i t e c t I n c 02 5 A S P A N I S H S T Y L E a n d s h r u b l o c a t 15 0 15 1 0 x PR I M B E D R M LINEN 11 1 15 1 0 x LO F T W. I C 21 7 L F 20'- 0x200CLEAR 20 1 20 2 x GA R A G E E W. I C BA T H 4 10 0 12 4 x BE D R M 5 KI T C H E N PA N T R Y 53'-0" 9 7 2 1 6 3$17522) 9( 15 8 7756 9 7 2 1 6 35 5 6&+( 0 6 0(( 6 0(( 7 0 7 6: 7 6 6 1 8 1 6 5 6 7 6 7 5 5, 0 6: 5 9 6: 61 2 2 8 1 6: 38 5 7 2 5 1 5 5 2 2 5 6: 85 1 8 1 6:18 7 7 6: 3( 7 5 6 7 25 6: 08 6 6: 8 5 2 5 5 2 1 6:5 2 1 2 5 2 1 78 1 5 7 2 78 1 5 5 7 2 5 78 1 5 6 1 0$ 0 6 7 2 9 0 0 6 7 2 9 0 0 6 7 2 9 7 6 7 4 6( 3 5 1 6 0 6 6 2 1 1 6 3 3 1 1 1 1 6 7 1 6 7 1 7 0 7 6: 3 8 5 7 6 7 6 0 2 5 1 5 5, 0 6:5 2 1 2 5 6: 5 9 6: 1 5 6 7 1 22 5 6: 5 7 9 7 6: 0( 6 6 1 5 6: 63 1 5 25 6 8 7 7 5 6 6:5 2 1 2 5 6:5 9 6 7 5 6: 02 8 1 7 7 1 6 7 2 1 6 7 2 1 1 6 3 5 1 6 6 7 2 1 2 5 6 7 2 1 0$ 1 1 7 R ROOF STUBDY ASCIATRIM ARAED RONTDOOR SHTTER ABLEENDDETAIL ROOF STUBDY ASCIATRIM LAPSIDING ORNERBOARDS ARAED FRNTD BR I ROOF STUBDY ASCIATRIM GABLESIDING ARAED RONTDOOR HUTTER T N 5$5'6 5. 9?5)$/9@.7.5- 5'/5- 9 8#$5 5)$/9 9 @ 5. 5-/# 5)$/9@. 5"#6$ 5$5$ 5$-5)$/9?5$6$ 5-5)$/9 7 7$/#5)$/9@.5$ 6$)"5(5 5 6 7 6 6 6 5)5 5.$)" 5)$/9 5)$/9@.7#$' 5 6$)"7 5-5 5'7$/#9@. 5)$/9<5 5-9'5(7 9 7 6 5/#5-5/# 6$6 5.@ 5)$/9?6$5)$/9@. 9 5 5/6$ 7 D 5)$/9 5)$/9 6 7 5$- 9./7 5.6 5) L 5 5)$/9 5./-8#$ 7)<6 9 7 6$5"#*5/5)$/9 7 9 6 9 7$/#$)9 8$./$)"5)$/9 7 5.1.e Packet Pg. 157 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 8/5$'5--*5)5' 9 9'7 6 6 7 7 7 9. 8$($:6 9 6$5 6 7 5+ 8 FV@G F -*(@.9 6 G?5-). 6 7 6 9 6$9 6 9 7 6 9 6$)9'?5(8$(5(8 FV@G 5)$/9 5 5'/$+'7 7 9.7$/#5--*5) 5)$/9 5 7 7 C/-7 5/ 7 6 7./*)6 5 5-5 5 5-/<5 5- 9"-*5)7 7 9.< 5.1.e Packet Pg. 158 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 5 5.1.e Packet Pg. 159 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 DR A I N A G E BA S I N H Y D R O S E E D S C H E D U L E W U C O L S L O W W W W W S S S S S 14 6 14 7 14 8 14 9 15 0 15 1 15 2 15 3 15 4 15 5 15 6 15 7 16 0 16 2 16 3 16 4 16 5 16 6 16 7 16 8 20 6 20 7 1 20 2 20 4 20 5 16 9 17 0 17 1 17 2 17 3 17 4 17 5 17 6 18.0'18.0' 16 1 20 3 SDSD SD SD SD SD S SD W W S S S S S S 17 9 18 0 18 1 18 2 18 3 18 4 18 5 18 6 18 7 18 8 18 9 0 18.0' MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 2 PR O P O S E D 0' WWW W WW WWW S S S SSS S SS S S S S S 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 3 27 7 27 8 27 9 28 0 28 1 28 2 28 3 28 4 28 5 28 6 28 7 28 8 28 9 29 0 30 3 30 4 30 5 30 6 30 7 30 8 30 9 31 031 1 31 2 31 3 31 4 31 5 31 6 18.0' 18 0 1 8 0 4 NE S E E S H E E T 3 W W W W W W W S S S S S S S S 6" W 6" S F M 6" S F M 6" S F M 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 39 3 39 4 39 5 39 6 39 7 39 8 39 9 40 0 40 1 40 2 40 3 40 4 40 5 40 6 40 7 40 8 40 9 41 0 18.0'18.0' 18.0'18.0' 18 0 1 8 0 PRO P O S E D P E R I M E T E R 8.0' SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD P 2 3 4 BI O R E T E N T I O N B A S I N P L A N T SC H E D U L E W U C O L S L O SY M B O L SCI E N T I F I C CO M M O N SI Z E TU R F E N L A R G M E N T SH A D E S T R U C T U R E W I T H P I C N I C T A B L E S CO N C R E T E M O W C U R B B E T W E E N T U R F A N D S H R U B A R E A S BI O R E T E N T I O N B A S I N P L A N T SC H E D U L E W U C O L S L O W SY M B O L SCI E N T I F I C CO M M O N SI Z E WU C O L S BI O R E T E N T I O N B A S I N E A S T E N L A R G M E N T WU C O L S M M L L L L M CAWST 24"RW 24"S 20"SFM 32 33 20' 40' OBI L I S M O N R I K LE U C O P H Y L L U M F R U T E S C E N S G R E E N C L O U D OL E A E U R O P A E A M O N T R A W W W W W W S S S S S S S 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 5 3 1 5 4 1 5 5 1 5 6 1 5 7 1 5 8 1 5 9 1 6 0 1 6 2 1 6 3 1 6 4 1 6 5 1 6 6 1 6 7 1 6 8 1 6 9 1 7 0 17 1 1 7 2 1 7 3 1 7 4 1 7 5 1 7 6 1 7 7 18.0'18.0' 1 8 0 18 0 16 1 SDSD W W W S S S S S S S 2 2 1 7 8 1 7 9 1 8 0 18 1 1 8 2 1 8 3 1 8 4 1 8 5 1 8 6 18.0' W MA T C H L I N E S E E S H E E T 10 W 0' WW WW WWW S S SS SS S S S S S 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 901263 2 7 8 2 7 9 2 8 0 28 1 2 8 2 2 8 3 2 8 4 2 8 5 2 8 6 2 8 7 2 8 8 2 8 9 3 0 4 3 0 5 3 0 6 3 0 7 3 0 8 3 0 9 31 0 31 1 3 1 2 3 1 3 3 1 4 3 1 5 18.0' 1 8 0 18 0 6 4 NE S E E S H E E T 11 6" W 6" S F M 6" S F M 6" S F M W W W W W W W W S S S S S S S S 4 4 5 5 3 5 4 5 5 5 6 5 7 5 8 5 9 6 0 61 6 2 6 3 3 9 2 3 9 3 3 9 4 3 9 5 3 9 6 3 9 7 3 9 8 3 9 9 4 0 0 40 1 4 0 2 4 0 3 4 0 4 4 0 5 4 0 6 4 0 7 4 0 8 4 0 9 4 1 0 41 1 18.0'18.0 18.0'18.0' 0 1 8 0 1 8 0 W- 0 1 W- 0 2 W- W- 0 6 W W W S 8 7 8 8 8 9 3 2 3 3 2 4 3 2 5 3 2 6 3 2 7 3 2 8 3 2 9 18.0' W W W WWW S S S SSS S S S 9 0919293 9 4 959697 9 8991 0 0 10 1 1 0 2 10 3 1 0 4 1 0 5 21 6 21 7 21 8 21 9 2 2 0 22 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 4 2 2 5 2 2 6 2 2 7 2 2 8 2 2 9 2 3 0 23 1 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 4 2 3 5 2 3 6 2 3 7 2 3 8 23 9 2 4 0 24 1 2 4 2 2 4 3 2 5 3 2 5 4 2 5 5 2 5 6 2 5 7 2 5 8 18.0' 18 0 18 0 18 0 18 0 2 4 9 2 5 0 25 1 2 5 2 N00°05'34" E2557.21' TBI TU R F CAWSTONAVENUE 30 3 144 24"RW 24"S 24"RW 24"S 24"RW 24"S 20"SFM 20"SFM 20"SFM N00°07'01" E2478.96' 4 5.1.e Packet Pg. 172 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 CA W S T O N A V E N U E SE E S H E E T 3 SE E S H E E T 4 SE E S H E E T 2 EA S E M E N T N O T E S AN C E R O A D S S T R E E T K M O D I F I E D L O C A L TY P I C A L S T R E E T S E C T I O N T. I 5 5 PR I V A T E S T R E E T S 4, 1 6 3 4, 1 6 3 4, 1 6 3 4, 1 6 3 4, 1 8 5 4, 1 4 0 4, 1 4 7 4, 0 9 1 4, 6 4 3 4, 5 4 5 4, 6 3 7 5, 1 2 0 5, 1 1 9 5, 1 1 9 5, 1 1 9 5, 1 1 9 5, 1 1 9 5, 1 2 0 4, 8 1 1 4, 6 9 6 5, 1 7 3 5, 1 7 3 5, 1 7 3 5, 1 7 3 5, 1 7 3 5, 1 7 3 5, 1 7 3 4, 6 3 8 4, 5 4 5 4, 6 4 3 4, 7 8 0 4, 3 2 8 4, 3 2 7 4, 3 2 9 4, 1 4 3 4, 1 6 3 4, 5 4 4 4, 7 8 0 4, 1 6 3 4, 1 6 3 16 1 5, 3 2 4 16 2 5, 3 2 4 16 3 5, 3 2 4 16 4 5, 1 4 3 16 5 4, 9 7 7 16 6 5, 5 4 2 16 7 5, 8 7 5 16 8 7, 0 9 9 16 9 5, 0 1 9 17 0 5, 7 4 1 17 1 4, 8 8 3 17 2 5, 0 7 3 17 3 5, 0 8 8 17 4 5, 0 8 8 17 5 5, 0 8 8 17 6 5, 0 8 8 17 7 4, 6 0 8 17 8 5, 0 2 9 17 9 5, 5 0 6 18 0 5, 5 0 6 18 1 5, 5 0 6 18 2 5, 5 0 6 18 3 5, 5 0 6 18 4 5, 5 0 6 18 5 5, 0 3 7 18 6 4, 3 6 1 18 7 4, 1 6 3 18 8 4, 3 4 3 18 9 4, 3 4 3 19 0 4, 3 4 3 19 1 4, 1 6 3 19 2 4, 1 6 3 19 3 4, 1 6 3 19 4 4, 1 6 3 19 5 4, 4 0 1 19 6 4, 2 4 1 19 7 4, 1 6 3 19 8 4, 1 6 3 19 9 4, 1 4 6 20 0 3, 7 7 3 21 1 4, 5 8 7 21 2 4, 7 0 9 21 3 4, 8 0 2 21 4 4, 6 3 8 21 5 4, 6 3 8 21 6 4, 8 7 6 21 7 4, 8 7 6 21 8 4, 8 7 5 21 9 4, 8 7 5 22 0 4, 7 0 0 22 1 4, 7 3 9 22 2 4, 6 3 6 22 3 4, 6 3 5 22 4 4, 6 3 6 22 5 4, 6 3 7 22 6 4, 6 3 7 22 7 4, 6 3 8 22 8 4, 6 3 5 22 9 4, 7 5 2 23 0 4, 9 5 6 23 1 4, 6 3 3 23 2 4, 6 3 3 23 3 4, 6 3 4 23 4 4, 5 8 6 23 5 4, 6 3 5 23 6 4, 6 3 6 23 7 4, 6 3 6 23 8 4, 6 3 6 23 9 4, 6 3 6 24 0 4, 7 3 9 24 1 4, 8 4 2 24 2 4, 8 4 2 24 3 4, 8 4 2 24 4 4, 7 3 9 24 5 4, 6 3 6 24 6 4, 8 8 4 24 7 4, 8 0 2 24 8 4, 6 4 5 24 9 4, 6 4 5 25 0 4, 8 8 3 26 1 4, 6 4 5 26 2 4, 8 4 3 26 3 4, 8 8 3 26 4 5, 0 8 9 26 5 4, 8 8 3 26 6 4, 8 8 3 26 7 4, 8 8 3 26 8 4, 6 4 5 26 9 4, 6 4 5 27 0 4, 8 0 2 27 1 5, 5 3 8 27 2 6, 2 6 9 27 3 6, 2 6 8 27 4 6, 2 6 9 27 5 6, 2 6 9 27 6 5, 4 3 2 27 7 5, 1 8 1 27 8 6, 0 1 9 27 9 6, 0 1 9 28 0 6, 0 1 9 28 1 6, 0 1 9 28 2 6, 0 1 9 28 3 5, 0 8 0 28 4 5, 2 8 5 28 5 6, 0 1 9 28 6 6, 0 1 9 28 7 6, 0 1 9 28 8 6, 0 1 9 28 9 6, 0 1 9 29 0 5, 1 8 1 29 1 5, 4 3 2 29 2 6, 2 6 9 29 3 6, 2 6 9 29 4 6, 2 6 9 29 5 6, 2 6 9 29 6 5, 3 2 9 29 7 5, 4 4 9 29 8 6, 1 7 9 29 9 6, 1 7 9 30 0 6, 1 7 9 5 5.1.e Packet Pg. 178 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 SEVENTHSTREET ESPLANADEAVENUE CA W S T O N A V E N U E SE E S H E E T 3 SE E S H E E T 4 SE E S H E E T 2 ES P L A N A D E S P E C IF I C P L A N SP 0 1 0 2 C IT Y O F S A N J A C IN T O SE A L DIG A L ER T W. O FO R BE N C H M A R K SC A L E DA T E DA T E CI T Y AP P R CH E C K E D B Y BY MA R K EN G IN E E R RE V IS IO N S DR A W N B Y DA T E DE S IG N E D B Y SH E E T N O FI L E N O 1 DA T E PR E P A R E D B Y R. C E N O OF 5 S H E E T S Pa rk C ity U T 840 98 5133 C ove C anyon D r 302 He m et CA 9 2544 4 155 5 E F lo rida Ave S uite G P hone 95 1 65 8 1 727 Fax 951 65 8 9347 CI V IL E N G I N E E R IN G BL A I N E A W O M E R Bo ise ID 83706 4 355 W E m erald S tree t St 14 5 Phon e 2 08 59 3 7555 1" 6 0 SE P T 1 8 2 0 2 4 T E N T A T I V E T R A C T MA P N O 3 9 0 7 6 RA M O N A D A IR Y AP P R O V E D B Y CO N T R A C T C IT Y E N G IN E E R DA T E TE N T A T I V E T R A C T M A P N O 3 9 0 7 6 IN T H E C I T Y O F S A N J A C I N T O PO R T I O N S E C T I O N 3 1 T O W N S H I P 4 S O U T H R A N G E 1 W E S T S B M VI C I N I T Y M A P N. T S AS S E S S O R S P A R C E L N O S OW N E R FL O O D P L A I N SC H O O L D I S T R I C T SO U R C E O F T O P O G R A P H Y AC R E A G E NU M B E R O F L O T S UT I L I T I E S PR O P O S E D Z O N I N G EX I S T I N G Z O N I N G PR O P O S E D L A N D U S E AD J A C E N T L A N D U S E EX I S T I N G L A N D U S E AP P L I C A N T SH E E T I N D E X LE G A L D E S C R IP T I O N EA S E M E N T N O T E S LI N E D A T A SE V E N T H S T R E E T M A J O R TY P I C A L S T R E E T S E C T I O N T. I 9 0 CA W S T O N A V E N U E M A J O R TY P I C A L S T R E E T S E C T I O N T. I 9 0 ES P L A N A D E A V E N U E A R T E R I A L TY P I C A L S T R E E T S E C T I O N T. I 9 5 RO A D S M O D I F I E D L O C A L TY P I C A L S T R E E T S E C T I O N T. I 5 5 EN T R A N C E R O A D S S T R E E T A M O D I F I E D L O C A L TY P I C A L S T R E E T S E C T I O N T. I 5 5 PR I V A T E S T R E E T S PR I V A T E S T R E E T S ZO N I N G TY P I C A L B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K S EA R T H W O R K C A L C U L A T I O N S DE N S I T Y OP E N S P A C E A R E A EN T R A N C E R O A D S S T R E E T K M O D I F I E D L O C A L TY P I C A L S T R E E T S E C T I O N T. I 5 5 PR I V A T E S T R E E T S PH A S I N G N O T E Ph a s e 1 12 0 L o t s 4 0 0 0 S F Ph a s e 1 11 5 L o t s 5 0 0 0 S F Ba c k b o n e S e v e n t h S t r e e t a n d C a w s t o n Av e n o r t h o f K S t r e e t t o b e c o n s t r u c t e d w i t h Ph a s e 1 Ph a s e 2 74 L o t s 4 0 0 0 S F Es p l a n a d e A v e a n d C a w s t o n A v e s o u t h o f K St r e e t t o b e c o n s t r u c t e d w i t h P h a s e 2 Ph a s e 2 11 0 L o t s 5 0 0 0 S F Ph a s e 1 12 0 L o t s 4 0 0 0 S F Ph a s e 1 11 5 L o t s 5 0 0 0 S F Ba c k b o n e i n t e r n a l s t r e e t s i n c l u d i n g S t r e e t A u n t i l S t r e e t L a n d S t r e e t K S e v e n t h S t r e e t an d C a w s t o n A v e n o r t h o f K S t r e e t t o b e co n s t r u c t e d w i t h P h a s e 1 Ph a s e 2 74 L o t s 4 0 0 0 S F Es p l a n a d e A v e a n d C a w s t o n A v e s o u t h o f K St r e e t t o b e c o n s t r u c t e d w i t h P h a s e 2 Ph a s e 2 11 0 L o t s 5 0 0 0 S FPh a s i n g M a p 5. 1 e Pa c k e t P g 1 7 9Attachment: PlannedDevelopmentPermit (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) 5 5.1.e Packet Pg. 180 At t a c h m e n t P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t P e r m i t C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 CA W S T O N A V E N U E SE E S H E E T 3 SE E S H E E T 4 SE E S H E E T 2 LE G A L EA S E M E N T N O T E S CA W S T O N A V E BL A C K O A K C T SHELBY LN HY C IN T H R D HI B I S C U S A V E LI N N E A F I E L D S KA R P I C K S T HARVEST LN RI L A N D L N DIAMOND VALLEY DR SHORTHORN DR DESIREE DR IN D I G O S K Y W A Y BE L M O N T L N TESSA CT KALIYA CT DALECT AZALEA AVE MISSION TRL VIOLET DR PACE TRL EUREKA RD LO R I T R E E TUBEROSE DR PANSY WAY RE E V E S P K W Y GL A D I O L U S W A Y DA R R E N C T BLUE SPRUCE LN MO S S Y O A K W AY SILVERMAPLEST DR A K E D R LARSON LN BOR REGODE SERT TRL COLORADO RIVER TRL LO NG H O R N D R HI G H L A N D DR GR O V E S I D E D R RED PINE ST HARTLEY PKWY BURGUNDY LACE LN COFFEEBERRYWAYCH ER RYLAUREL LN NEWCASTLE WAY SAN L U I S R EY P L CROOKED BRANCH WAY CA T ALPA PARK W AY NO R T H W O O D A V E WH I T E O A K S T AN Z A T R L 7TH ST BL A C K C H E R R Y S T PLACENTIA ST WA M B L E E L N CEN T E R GRO VE WAY PERE GR I N E L N OVE R L E AF W AY SEASONSBREEZE ESPLANADE AVE k 432-260-009/026/027 Location Map 6DQ DFLQWR LW\LPLWV 3URMHFW 6LWH Project Site 5.1.f Packet Pg. 185 At t a c h m e n t L o c a t i o n M a p C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 CA W S T O N A V E DESIREE DR BE L M O N T L N YELLOW BIRCH LN TESSA CT KALIYA CT DALE CT AZALEA AVE MISSION TRL VIOLET DR PACE TRL EUREKA RD LO R I T R E E TUBEROSE DR PANSY WAY RE E V E S P K W Y GL A D I O L U S W A Y DA R R E N C T MO S S Y O A K W AY SILVER MAPLE ST DR A K E D R LARSON LN BOR REGODE SERT TRL COLORADO RIVER TRL LO NG H O R N D R HIG H L AN D D R GR O V E S I D E D R RED PINE ST HARTLEY PKWY BURGUNDY LACE LN COFFEEBERRYWAYCH ER RYLAUREL LN NEWCASTLE WAY SAN L U I S R EY P L CROOKED BRANCH WAY CA T A L P A P A RK W AY NO R T H W O O D A V E WH I T E OA KST AN Z A T R L 7TH ST BL A C K C H E R R Y S T PLACENTIA ST WA M B L E E L N CENTERGRO V E W A Y PE R E G R I N E L N OVE R L E A F W AY SEASONS BREEZE ESPLANADE AVE k 432-260-009/026/027 General Plan Land Use Map DQG 8VH HVLJQDWLRQ 9/'5 9HU\RZ HQVLW\5HVLGHQWLDO 5 RZ HQVLW\5HVLGHQWLDO RPPHUFLDO 3,3XEOLF QVWLWXWLRQDO 3 3DUN 63$6SHFLILF 3ODQ UHD 6DQ DFLQWR LW\LPLWV 3URMHFW 6LWH Project Site 5.1.g Packet Pg. 186 At t a c h m e n t G e n e r a l P l a n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 CA W S T O N A V E DESIREE DR BE L M O N T L N YELLOW BIRCH LN TESSA CT KALIYA CT DALE CT AZALEA AVE MISSION TRL VIOLET DR PACE TRL EUREKA RD LO R I T R E E TUBEROSE DR PANSY WAY RE E V E S P K W Y GL A D I O L U S W A Y DA R R E N C T MO S S Y O A K W AY SILVER MAPLE ST DR A K E D R LARSON LN BOR REGODE SERT TRL COLORADO RIVER TRL LO NG H O R N D R HIG H L AN D D R GR O V E S I D E D R RED PINE ST HARTLEY PKWY BURGUNDY LACE LN COFFEEBERRYWAYCH ER RYLAUREL LN NEWCASTLE WAY SAN L U I S R EY P L CROOKED BRANCH WAY CA T A L P A P A RK W AY NO R T H W O O D A V E WH I T E OA KST AN Z A T R L 7TH ST BL A C K C H E R R Y S T PLACENTIA ST WA M B L E E L N CENTERGRO V E W A Y PE R E G R I N E L N OVE R L E A F W AY SEASONS BREEZE ESPLANADE AVE k 432-260-009/026/027 Zoning Map 5HVLGHQWLDO RQHV 55 5XUDO 5HVLGHQWLDO 5/5HVLGHQWLDO RZ HQVLW\ RPPHUFLDO DQG QGXVWULDO RQHV RPPHUFLDO HQHUDO 6SHFLDO 3XUSRVH RQHV 265 2SHQ 6SDFH 5HFUHDWLRQ 3,3XEOLF QVWLWXWLRQDO 63 6SHFLILF 3ODQ 6DQ DFLQWR LW\LPLWV 3URMHFW 6LWH Project Site 5.1.h Packet Pg. 187 At t a c h m e n t Z o n i n g M a p C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Chacon Farms Project Tentative Tract Map No. 39076 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Case No. PROJ23-0029 Prepared For: City of San Jacinto Planning and Building Division 595 South San Jacinto Avenue San Jacinto, California 92583 Prepared By : 11801 Pierce Street, Ste. 200 Riverside, CA 92505 KŽ 2025 5.1.i Packet Pg. 188 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 5.1.i Packet Pg. 189 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Table of Contents 1. Purpose and Scope ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Content and Format of the Initial Study ....................................................................................... 2 1.2 Initial Study Summary of Findings ................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Documents Incorporated by Reference ....................................................................................... 3 1.4 Contact Person ............................................................................................................................. 3 2. Summary and Environmental Determination .................................................................................. 1 2.1 Project Summary .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Environmental Analysis and Determination ................................................................................. 3 3. Project Description ......................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Project Setting .............................................................................................................................. 6 3.2 Project Characteristics .................................................................................................................. 7 3.3 Project Characteristics - Operations ........................................................................................... 11 3.4 Project Approvals ........................................................................................................................ 11 4. Environmental Impacts ................................................................................................................. 17 4.1 Aesthetics ................................................................................................................................... 17 4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources ........................................................................................... 20 4.3 Air Quality ................................................................................................................................... 23 4.4 Biological Resources ................................................................................................................... 41 4.5 Cultural Resources ...................................................................................................................... 50 4.6 Energy ......................................................................................................................................... 56 4.7 Geology and Soils ........................................................................................................................ 63 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ......................................................................................................... 68 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials .............................................................................................. 83 4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality ..................................................................................................... 88 4.11 Land Use and Planning................................................................................................................ 94 4.12 Mineral Resources .................................................................................................................... 106 4.13 Noise ......................................................................................................................................... 107 4.14 Population and Housing ........................................................................................................... 124 4.15 Public Services .......................................................................................................................... 126 4.16 Recreation ................................................................................................................................. 129 4.17 Transportation .......................................................................................................................... 131 4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources .......................................................................................................... 138 4.19 Utilities and Service Systems .................................................................................................... 141 4.20 Wildfire ..................................................................................................................................... 146 4.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance .......................................................................................... 1 48 5. List of Preparers ......................................................................................................................... 150 6. References ................................................................................................................................. 151 5.1.i Packet Pg. 190 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 List of Tables Table 1: Surrounding Land Use ........................................................................................................................ 2 Table 2: Project Construction Phasing Summary ........................................................................................... 10 Table 3: Ambient Air Quality Standards ......................................................................................................... 23 Table 4: Local Air Quality Levels from the Banning Monitoring Stations ...................................................... 28 Table 5: South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status ......................................................................................... 29 Table 6: Regional Significance – Construction Emissions (pounds/day) ........................................................ 33 Table 7: Construction Equipment Assumptions............................................................................................. 34 Table 8: Localized Significance – Construction .............................................................................................. 35 Table 9: Regional Significance – Unmitigated Operational Emissions ........................................................... 36 Table 10: Localized Significance – Unmitigated Operational Emissions ........................................................ 37 Table 11: Prior Cultural Studies Within ½-mile of the Project Site ................................................................ 50 Table 12: Previously Recorded Cultural Resources Within ½ Mile of the Project Site .................................. 52 Table 13: Project Construction Power Cost and Electricity Usage ................................................................. 58 Table 14: Construction Equipment Fuel Consumption Estimates ................................................................. 58 Table 15: Construction Worker Fuel Consumption Estimates ....................................................................... 59 Table 16: Construction Vendor Fuel Consumption Estimates (MHD Trucks) ................................................ 60 Table 17: Construction Hauling Fuel Consumption Estimates (HHD Trucks) ................................................. 60 Table 18: Estimated Vehicle Operations Fuel Consumption ......................................................................... 61 Table 19: Project Unmitigated Annual Operational Energy Demand Summary ............................................ 61 Table 20: GHG Descriptions ........................................................................................................................... 68 Table 21: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions....................................................................................... 77 Table 22: Opening Year Unmitigated Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...................................... 78 Table 23: Applicable WRCPG Subregional CAP Local Reduction Measure Project Comparison ................... 79 Table 24: Project Consistency with CARB Scoping Plan Policies and Measures ............................................ 80 Table 25: General Plan Policy Consistency Analysis....................................................................................... 95 Table 26: Noise Levels for Common Events ................................................................................................. 107 Table 27: City of San Jacinto Guidelines for Noise Compatible Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Exposure (dBA, CNEL) .................................................................................... 115 Table 28: Long-Term Noise Measurement Data .......................................................................................... 117 Table 29: Construction Noise Levels at Noise-Sensitive Uses ...................................................................... 118 Table 30: Off-Site Change in Existing Noise Levels as a Result of the Project ............................................. 120 Table 31: On-Site Existing Plus Project Exterior Noise Levels ...................................................................... 120 Table 32: Guideline Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria........................................................... 121 Table 33: Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment .............................................................................. 122 Table 34: Proposed Student Generation ..................................................................................................... 127 Table 35: Parks Located Within One Mile of the Project Site ...................................................................... 129 Table 36: Fair Share Percentage Calculations for Required Traffic Signals ................................................. 136 List of Figures Figure 1 – Regional Vicinity ............................................................................................................................ 12 Figure 2 – Site Location, Aerial View .............................................................................................................. 13 Figure 3 – Site Location, USGS ....................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 4 – Site Plan Schematic, TTM 39076 ................................................................................................... 15 Figure 5 – Concept Landscaping Plan............................................................................................................. 16 5.1.i Packet Pg. 191 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 List of Appendices Appendix A-1 Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study, MD Acoustics, April 28, 2025 Appendix A-2 Chacon Farms, Health Risk Assessment, City of San Jacinto, MD Acoustics, April 28, 2025 Appendix B-1 Habitat Assessment for Chacon Farms Property, Psomas, March 5, 2024 Appendix B-2 Tree Inventory Report for the Chacon Farms Property, City of San Jacinto, California, Psomas, April 28, 2023 Appendix C Phase I Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Inventory, Psomas, October 2023 Appendix D-1 Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, SWC of 7th Street and Cawston Ave, San Jacinto, California, Geocon West, Inc, November 4, 2022 Appendix D-2 Updated Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation (Geotechnical Evaluation) Geocon West Inc., January 2, 2024 Appendix E Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA), Partner Engineering and Science Inc., September 30, 2024. Appendix F-1 Preliminary Hydrology Study for Tentative Tract 39076, Blaine A Womer Civil Engineering, October 27, 2024 (Revised July 14, 2025). Appendix F-2 Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, Blaine Womer Civil Engineering, October 27, 2024, Revised July 14, 2025. Appendix G Chacon Farms, Noise Impact Study, MD Acoustics, October 3, 2024 Appendix H Chacon Farms Trip Generation Analysis, City of San Jacinto, TJW Engineering, September 17, 2024, with Chacon Farms Draft Transportation Impact Study, Psomas, March 2024. Appendix I Planned Development Permit, Chacon Farms, Tentative Tract Map No. 39076, Taylor & Clark Consulting, LLC, November 4, 2024 List of Acronymns Acronym Definition AB 32 Assembly Bill 32 AB 52 Assembly Bill 52 ADA Americans with Disabilities Act AFY Acre Feet Per Year AQMP Air Quality Management Plan APE Area of Potential Effect APN Assessor Parcel Number APZ Accident Potential Zone BMPs Best Management Practices CARB California Air Resources Board CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CEQA California Environmental Quality Act City City of San Jacinto CNPS California Native Plant Society CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level CO Carbon Monoxide CRHR California Register of Historic Places dBA A-Weighted Decibels DIF Development Impact Fees DPM Diesel Particulate Matter EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act FAR Floor Area Ratio 5.1.i Packet Pg. 192 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FMMP Farmland Mapping Management Program GHG Greenhouse Gas GSP Groundwater Sustainability Plan gpd/acre Gallons per Day per Acre HAER Historic American Engineering Record HCP Habitat Conservation Plan ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers LID Low Impact Design LOS Level of Service LST Localized Significance Threshold MDAQMD Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District mgd Millions of Gallons per Day MLD Most Likely Descendent MMRP Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MRZ Mineral Resources Zone MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Water Sewer System MTCO2e Metric Tons Carbon Dioxide Equivalent NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NCCP Natural Communities Conservation Plan ND Negative Declaration NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide NOx Nitrogen Oxides NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System PCE Passenger Car-Equivalent PM-2.5 Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Microns in Diameter PM-10 Particulate Matter Less Than 10 Microns in Diameter PRIMMP Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Monitoring Program RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board SGMA Sustainability Groundwater Management Act SF Square Feet SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SRA State Responsibility Area SSC Species of Special Concern SWPPP Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board TIA Traffic Impact Analysis TUMF Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee 5.1.i Packet Pg. 193 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 1. Purpose and Scope Richard Michael (Applicant) is proposing the Chacon Farms Project (Tentative Tract Map 39076) to subdivide 75.7 gross acres into 419 single family residential lots, four open space lots, and new roadways (Proposed Project). The Proposed Project Site is currently comprised of agricultural lands and is bounded by W. Seventh Street on the north, W. Esplanade Avenue on the south, Cawston Avenue North on the east, and a planned development on the west. The Proposed Project Site is identified as Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 432- 260-009, -026, and -027. The Proposed Project is subject to approval of the following entitlements: x Per San Jacinto Development Code (“SJDC”) Section 17.720.020, a General Plan Amendment to revise the land use designation from VLDR (Very Low Density Residential) to LDR (Low Density Residential) for the Proposed Project Site located at 710 Cawston Avenue North (APNs 432-260-009, 432-260- 026, and 432-260-027); x Per SJDC Section 17.720.020, a Zoning Map Amendment (Zone Change) from the RR Zone (Rural Residential) to the LDR Zone (Residential – Low Density) for the Proposed Project Site; x Per SJDC Section 17.620, a Planned Development Permit (PDP); x Per SJDC Section 17.630.040 approval of Site Plan and Design Review; x Per San Jacinto Municipal Code (“SJMC”) Section 16.25 a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 39076) for the subdivision of the Proposed Project Site into 419 residential lots (for the development of 419 single family homes) and 4 lettered lots. The Proposed Project is a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.: “CEQA”). The primary purpose of CEQA is to inform the public and decision makers as to the potential impacts of a project and to allow an opportunity for public input to ensure informed decision- making. CEQA requires all state and local government agencies to consider the environmental effects of projects over which they have discretionary authority. CEQA also requires each public agency to mitigate or avoid any significant environmental impacts resulting from the implementation of projects subject to CEQA. Pursuant to Section 15367 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City of San Jacinto (City) is the lead agency for the Proposed Project. The lead agency is the public agency that has the principal responsibility for conducting or approving a project. The City, as the lead agency for the Proposed Project, is responsible for preparing environmental documentation in accordance with CEQA to determine if approval of the discretionary actions requested and subsequent development of the Proposed Project would have a significant impact on the environment. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000- 21178.1), this Initial Study has been prepared to analyze the Proposed Project to determine any potential significant impacts upon the environment that would result from construction and implementation of the Proposed Project. In accordance with California Code of Regulations, Section 15063, this Initial Study is a preliminary analysis prepared by the Lead Agency in consultation with other jurisdictional agencies, to determine whether a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, or an Environmental Impact Report is required for the Proposed Project. The purpose of this Initial Study is to inform the decision-makers, affected agencies, and the public of potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the Proposed Project. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 194 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 A Lead Agency may prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration for a project that is subject to CEQA when an Initial Study has identified potentially significant effects on the environment, but (1) revisions in the project plans or proposals made by, or agreed to by, the Applicant before the proposed Negative Declaration and Initial Study are released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment would occur, and (2) there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record before the public agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment (Public Resources Code Section 21064.5). This Initial Study has been prepared for the Proposed Project, in conformance with Section 15070(b) of the CEQA Guidelines. This Initial Study analyzes potentially significant impacts associated with the Proposed Project and incorporates mitigation measures into the Proposed Project as necessary to eliminate the potentially significant effects of the Proposed Project or to reduce the effects to a level of less than significant. 1.1 Content and Format of the Initial Study The Initial Study is organized as follows: x Section 1 – Purpose and Scope. This section introduces the scope of the Proposed Project and the City’s role in the project, as well as a brief summary of findings. x Section 2 – Project Summary and Environmental Determination. This section summarizes the Proposed Project and actions to be undertaken by the City. This section also provides the determination of the environmental document to be approved by the City. x Section 3 – Project Description. This section details the Proposed Project components and general environmental setting. x Section 4 – Environmental Impacts. This section contains the Environmental Checklist Form, as suggested in Section 15063(d)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as amended, and includes a series of questions about the project for each of the listed environmental topics. The Form evaluates whether or not there would be significant environmental effects associated with the development of the project and provides mitigation measures, when required, to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. The form requires an analysis in 20 subject categories as well as Mandatory Findings of Significance. x Section 5 – List of Preparers. This section identifies the names and affiliations of the individuals who contributed to the preparation of the environmental evaluation. x Section 6 – References. This section identifies the references used in the preparation of this Initial Study. 1.2 Initial Study Summary of Findings Based on the analysis in Section 4, there were no environmental factors that could potentially affect Potentially Significant”) the environment. Mitigation measures were identified to reduce some impacts to Less Than Significant. Therefore, the determination, based on the Initial Study, is that a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be prepared. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 195 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 1.3 Documents Incorporated by Reference The following reports and/or studies are applicable to analysis of the development of the Project Site and are hereby incorporated by reference: x Envision San Jacinto, General Plan 2040 (City, November 15, 2022). (Available at https://www.sanjacintoca.gov/city_departments/community-development/general-plan x Public Review Draft, Environmental Impact Report for the San Jacinto General Plan Update (SCH: 2020120312), July 2022, prepared by De Novo Planning Group (City, 2022a) Available at: https://sanjacinto.generalplan.org/documents-amp-maps x Administrative Draft Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, Chacon Farms Project, PROJ23- 0029, prepared by Psomas, April 2024. This document assessed the potential environmental impacts of a previous design for the Project, known as Vesting Tentative Tract Map 38787 that identified 210 single family residences and 430 townhomes on 75 gross acres/50.13 net acres, requiring a General Plan Amendment from Very Low Density to Medium Density and a Zone Change from Rural Residential to Residential-Medium Density. The Administrative Draft Initial Study was prepared for City of San Jacinto as a draft analysis and is on file with the City of San Jacinto Planning Division. Since the preparation of the Administrative Draft Initial Study in April 2024, the Project design was modified to the current Project, known as Tentative Tract Map 39076 that identifies 419 single family residences and four open space lots on approximately 75 gross acres, requiring a General Plan Amendment from Very Low Density Residential to Low Density Residential and a Zone Change from Rural Residential to Residential-Low Density. Most of the environmental analysis prepared for the original Project design is unchanged for the analysis of the current Project design; however, the modified Project required a re-evaluation of studies in the categories of hydrology, noise, and transportation. Because the air quality, energy, and greenhouse gas emissions were assessed on a more intensive project design and found to be less than significant, these studies were not revised; therefore, the data from the more intensive project design was utilized for the analysis of the current Proposed Project. P22-079 – Revision to Esplanade Specific Plan and TTM32955: A proposal to revise approved Tentative Tract Map 32955, phases 32955-2, -3,-4 within Planning Areas 1, 3, 5, 7 and 8 of the Esplanade Specific Plan for 852 single-family residential lots and one,+/-36.1-acre mixed use lot with capacity for 194 multi-family units. The project includes an amendment to approved SP 01-02 (the Esplanade Specific Plan) and revisions to several improvements to match and support revisions to the associated tract map. Environmental: Initial Study. These documents are available for review at the City of San Jacinto Planning and Building Division, 595 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583. 1.4 Contact Person City of San Jacinto Planning and Building Division Attn: Yaneli Hernandez, Senior Planner 595 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583 Phone: (951) 487-7330 Email: yhernandez@sanjacintoca.gov 5.1.i Packet Pg. 196 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 2. Summary and Environmental Determination 2.1 Project Summary 1. Project Title: Chacon Farms Project: Tentative Tract Map No. 39076 PROJ23-0029 2. Lead Agency Name: City of San Jacinto Address: Planning and Building Division 595 South San Jacinto Avenue San Jacinto, CA 92583 3. Contact Person: Yaneli Hernandez, Senior Planner Planning and Building Division 595 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583 Email: yhernandez@sanjacintoca.gov 4. Project Location: 710 Cawston Avenue North Between Seventh Street, W. Esplanade Avenue and Cawston Avenue Gross Acres: 75.7 Site Address: None assigned. Topographic Quad (USGS 7.5”): Lakeview Topographic Quad Coordinates: T4 South, R1 West, Section 31, 32 Latitude: 33°46'36.66"N, Longitude: - 117° 1'3.84"W APN: 432-260-009, -026, and -027 5. Project Sponsor’s Name: Ramona Dairy, LLC, Attn: Richard Michael Address 2451 Ramona Expressway, San Jacinto, CA 92582 6. General Plan Designation: Existing: Very Low Density Residential (VLDR) Proposed: Low Density Residential (LDR) 7. Zoning Designation: Existing: Rural Residential (RR) Proposed: Residential, Low Density (RL) 8. Description of Project: Richard Michael (Applicant) is proposing the Chacon Farms Project (Tentative Tract Map 39076) to subdivide 75.7 gross acres into 419 single family residential lots, four open space lots, and new roadways within agricultural lands bounded by W. Seventh Street on the north, W. Esplanade Avenue on the south, Cawston Avenue North on the east, and a planned development on the west. The Proposed Project Site is identified as Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 432-260-009, -026, and -027. The purpose of the Project is to obtain entitlements that would enable the subdivision of the property, which would ultimately provide additional housing options to serve the growing population of the City of San Jacinto. The Project requires a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to increase allowed housing density. 9. Surrounding Land Uses: Surrounding land uses are identified in Table 1 – Surrounding Land Use. The Project Site is currently occupied by Chacon Farms and Bruno Ranches agricultural operations. Two single-family residential uses occupied by caretakers are also located on the Proposed Project Site. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 197 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Table 1: Surrounding Land Use Project Site Chacon Farms and Bruno Ranches agricultural operations RR (Rural Residential) North West Seventh Street followed by a single-family residential development and Catalpa Park RL (Residential, Low Density); South West Esplanade Avenue followed by GH Dairy Farm 1455 Cawston Avenue North) and Ridgely Farms Sources: Google Earth Imagery; City of San Jacinto Zoning Map; City of Hemet Zoning Map 10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required: The following discretional approvals are required for the Project: State Agencies: x Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board: approval of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit to ensure that construction site drainage velocities are equal to or less than the pre-construction conditions and downstream water quality is not worsened. 11. California Native American Consultation On February 22, 2024, the City of San Jacinto notified via email the following tribal entities of the Project and requested a timeframe in which to request consultation in accordance with AB52 and SB18. The following summarizes the results of the AB52 consultation. x Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians. Result: Mitigation measures requested to manage unanticipated tribal resources. Consultation concluded. x Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians. Result: No potential tribal resources. Consultation concluded. x Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation. Result: the Project site was outside of Serrano ancestral territory. Consultation concluded. x Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI). Result: Letter dated February 26, 2024 requested formal consultation and more information identified in the Cultural Resources Report. Letter received April 21, 2025 stating the Project site is outside of the boundaries of the ACBCI Reservation, but within the tribe’s traditional use area. ACBCI deferred to Soboba for this Site. Consultation concluded. Mitigation measures to ensure resources to tribal cultural resources are minimized have been incorporated, as appropriate, into the Initial Study. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 198 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 2.2 Environmental Analysis and Determination In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000- 21178.1), this Initial Study has been prepared to analyze the Proposed Project to determine any potential significant impacts upon the environment that would result from construction and implementation of the Project. This Initial Study is based on an Environmental Checklist Form (Form), as suggested in Section 15063(d)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, as amended, and includes a series of questions about the project for each of the listed environmental topics. The Form evaluates whether or not there would be significant environmental effects associated with the development of the project and provides mitigation measures, when required, to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. In accordance with California Code of Regulations, Section 15063, this Initial Study is a preliminary analysis prepared by the Lead Agency in consultation with other jurisdictional agencies, to determine whether a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, or an Environmental Impact Report is required for the Proposed Project. The purpose of this Initial Study is to inform the decision-makers, affected agencies, and the public of potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the Proposed Project. 2.2.1 Organization of Environmental Analysis Section 4 provides a discussion of the potential environmental impacts of the Project. The evaluation of environmental impacts follows the questions provided in the Form provided in the CEQA Guidelines. 2.2.2 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to the project (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off site as well as on site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation incorporated, or less than significant. Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact.” Mitigation measures are identified and explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures may be cross-referenced). Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the Program EIR or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15063[c][3][D]. In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: 5.1.i Packet Pg. 199 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 a) Earlier analyses used where they are available for review. b) Which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards and whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) The mitigation measures that were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project for effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated. References and citations have been incorporated into the checklist references to identify information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. Source listings and other sources used, or individuals contacted are cited in the discussion. The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. 2.2.3 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected Based on the analysis in Section 4, the Proposed Project could potentially affect (“Potentially Significant”) the environmental factor(s) checked below. The following pages present a more detailed checklist and discussion of each environmental factor and identifies where mitigation measures would be necessary to reduce all impacts to less than significant levels. and Soils and Planning 5.1.i Packet Pg. 200 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 2.2.4 Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation, the following finding is made: Proposed Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a will be prepared. X Although the Proposed Project Project Project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Proposed Project Proposed Project Proposed Project Proposed Project, nothing further is required. Signature Date Name Title 5.1.i Packet Pg. 201 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 3. Project Description 3.1 Project Setting 3.1.1 Site Location The Proposed Project Site is located at 710 Cawston Avenue North in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, between Seventh Street to the north and Esplanade Avenue to the south. The Proposed Project Site is also bordered by the City of Hemet to the south. The San Jacinto Mountains are located to the east and the Lakeview Mountains are located to the west of the Proposed Project Site. Refer to Figure 1: Reginal Vicinity and Figure 2: Site Location - Aerial View. The Project includes three lots associated with Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 432-260-009, -026, and -027 and is comprised of 75.7 gross acres. Local vehicular access to the Proposed Project Site is provided by existing driveways located on Seventh Street to the north and Cawston Avenue to the east, which are both classified as major roadways. Regional access is provided by State Route (SR) 74, approximately 3.9 miles south of the Proposed Project Site and SR- 79, approximately 5.5 miles northeast of the site. The Proposed Project Site is within the Lakeview U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographical map in Sections 31, 32, Township 4 South, Range 1 West at an elevation of approximately 1,511 feet above mean sea level (Figure 3: Site Location - USGS). The topography of the site is relatively planar with a very gentle fall toward the east. 3.1.2 Existing Site Conditions The Proposed Project Site is occupied by Chacon Farms and Bruno Ranches agricultural operations. Two single-family residential uses occupied by caretakers are also located on the Proposed Project Site. Onsite operations consist of the cultivation of alfalfa and routine facility maintenance. In addition to the residences and alfalfa crops, the Proposed Project Site is also improved with a capped irrigation well, cattle corrals, irrigation infrastructure, two septic systems, asphalt pavement beneath the storage barns, a grain storage vessel, concrete driveway, and unpaved roads that surround and bisect the Proposed Project Site. Additionally, a detention basin is located on the northwest portion of the Proposed Project Site. 3.1.3 Existing Utilities Water Water is provided to the Proposed Project Site by the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), which provides potable water, recycled water, and wastewater services to an area of approximately 555 square miles in western Riverside County. Local supplies include recycled water, potable groundwater, and desalinated groundwater, and imported supplies from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Metropolitan), which comprises about half of the water used in EMWD’s service area, is provided by EMWD. There are multiple domestic water mains in each of the streets surrounding the Proposed Project Site. Water mains range in size from 2 to 30 inches in Cawston Avenue North and West Esplanade Avenue. A 12-inch main runs the improved length of West Seventh Street. Fire hydrants are located along Cawston Avenue North and West Seventh Street. There is a 24-inch recycled water main running north to south in Cawston Avenue North. Wastewater The City Public Utilities Department owns and operates the sewage collection system. Sewage is treated by the San Jacinto Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility, located at 770 N Sanderson Avenue, San Jacinto, 5.1.i Packet Pg. 202 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 approximately 1 mile north of the Proposed Project Site. There is a 24-inch gravity sanitary sewer running north in Cawston Avenue North and then east on West Seventh Street. There is also a 20-inch EMWD sewage force main running along Proposed Project Site’s eastern property line within a 14-foot easement. Stormwater The development of the Project site will result in an increased area of impervious surfaces, including roofs, asphalt, concrete, sidewalks, and driveways. The property's natural drainage pattern directs flow toward the northwest, and this orientation has been incorporated into the project's grading design. Each lot will drain through vegetated swales to the adjacent streets. Stormwater from the streets will be conveyed to onsite bioretention basins for preliminary treatment. Should the volume of stormwater exceed basin capacity, excess runoff will be managed by an onsite storm drain system, which will divert additional flow to a retention basin located at the northwest corner of the property. The stormwater retention basin described above has been designed to address the incremental increase in runoff volume resulting from development for the 100-year, 24-hour storm event. Any runoff exceeding the mitigation volume will be conveyed to Seventh Street via a curb outlet structure. Subsequently, the stormwater will travel approximately 1,786 feet west through a force main line to an existing catch basin. The construction of the force main line will occur within the area designated for street improvements along Seventh Street, as established by Tract No. 32955 and addressed in the CEQA documentation approved for that project. Power San Jacinto Power provides electricity to the City and surrounding areas, including the Proposed Project Site. Existing overhead electric lines run along the east side of Cawston Avenue North with several guy poles on the Proposed Project Site buttressing service lines running east. Overhead transmission and distribution lines run east to west on the southern side of West Esplanade Avenue. Existing residences on the Proposed Project Site are served by an overhead line from Cawston Avenue North and a service pole near the residences. All other power is underground in West Seventh Street. Telecommunications Telecommunications providers within the site vicinity include Frontier, Verizon, and AT&T for telephone services and Charter and Crown-Castle for cable services. There are existing facilities in Cawston Avenue North adjacent to the site. 3.1.4 Planning Context The Proposed Project Site has a General Plan land use designation of VLDR (Very Low Density Residential). The Proposed Project Site is currently zoned Rural Residential, which according to the San Jacinto Development Code Section 17.215.010, is applied to areas appropriate for detached single-family dwelling units with appropriate accessory structures and uses in a semirural setting. The Rural Residential zone may also allow mobile and modular homes, public facilities, and other uses that are compatible with rural single- family neighborhoods. Horses and other farm animals are also allowed in this zone in compliance with Section 17.430.050 (Animal Keeping). This zone allows a maximum density of 2.0 dwelling units per gross acre of land. The Rural Residential zone is consistent with the VLDR land use designation of the General Plan. 3.2 Project Characteristics 3.2.1 Site Plan The Project involves subdividing 75.7 gross acres into 419 single family residential lots, four open space lots Tentative Tract Map 39076), as shown on Figure 4: Site Plan Schematic, TTM 30926. The lots generally range 5.1.i Packet Pg. 203 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 in size from 4,500 square feet (SF) to 6,500 SF as shown in Appendix I: Planned Development Permit. The community would be connected by an internal roadway network gaining access via Cawston Avenue, Seventh Street and Esplanade Avenue. Proposed on-site pedestrian trails and paths would provide access to the range of residential types within the community, as well as open spaces, parks, and a neighborhood park with a clubhouse and associated amenities, as described further below. Four lettered lots totaling 6.6 acres would be set aside for dual use as both landscaped stormwater control basins and picnic/greenspace areas connected with trails. The total Project area would equate to 75.7 acres. 3.2.2 Off-Site Improvements: The Project involves improvements within the public right-of-way (ROW), such as street dedications and improvements, sidewalks and landscaping along West Seventh Street and Cawston Avenue, and sidewalks and landscaping along West Esplanade Avenue. 3.2.3 Access/Circulation The internal vehicular circulation network would include the main road running north/south through the center of the site with ingress/egress on Seventh Street on the north and W Esplanade Avenue on the south. A local entry road is planned for Cawston Avenue that would connect to the main north/south roadway. The internal street system would primarily comprise local access roads, as shown on Appendix I. 3.2.4 Open Space and Parks The Project would incorporate a variety of open space areas, including a private and public multi-use path linking key areas and providing pedestrian access throughout the Proposed Project Site. Four lots (Lot A, B, C, and D) totaling 6.61 acres are provided throughout the development that provide a combination of detention basins, biofiltration and park space. 3.2.5 Landscaping The Project would include various landscape treatments as shown in Appendix I which delineates major landscape treatments and identifies planting types. Figure 5: Concept Landscaping Plan provides a compilation of the landscaping plan presented in Appendix I. Proposed landscaped types would include trees and shrubs as shown in the Preliminary Plant Palette, included as part of the Planned Development Permit in Appendix I. The Landscape Plan would comply with the San Jacinto Landscape Design Guidelines (San Jacinto 2005), which includes an approved plant list. The Landscape Design Guidelines aim to retain the community’s rural agricultural roots, and water wise planting (i.e. drought tolerant, native, or low-water plants) is utilized whenever possible. The Project would remove 22 existing on-site trees with diameters of 9.5 inches or greater, five of which are street trees located within the Proposed Project Site’s boundary, including one Tree of Heaven (Ailanthus altissima) , one Lemon Tree (Citrus limon), two Mondell Pines (Pinus eldarica), one Peach Tree (Prunus persica), four Peruvian Pepper Tree (Schinus molle), four California Fan Palms Washingtonia filifera) and nine Mexican Fan Palms (Washingtonia robusta). Removal of the trees within the public street right-of-way would require authorization from the City Council, in accordance with San Jacinto Municipal Code (SJMC) Section 12.20.050 All other tree removals during Project construction would require replacement from the Applicant and approval by the City Parks and Recreation Commission. 3.2.6 Architectural Design and Elevations The Architectural Design Guidelines in Appendix I conveys the Chacon Farms community’s architectural design theme. It is not the intent of the Guidelines to mandate that all the identified design components and elements described be incorporated into the actual building designs. Rather, the Guidelines serve as a palette” of character-defining exterior elements that should be used in home design. It is expected that builders and their architects would prepare architectural building plans that substantially conform to the 5.1.i Packet Pg. 204 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 guidelines, while also applying creativity and innovation in response to housing design trends, homebuyer expectations, and other market conditions. 3.2.7 Sustainability Features The Project would be constructed in compliance with the latest 2022 Title 24, Part 6 Energy Code and Title 24, Part 11 California Green Building Code requirements, which mandates the inclusion of various design features meant to reduce energy consumption and promote sustainable development. These features include but are not limited to the following: x Solar photovoltaic systems equipped on all 419 dwelling units; x Energy storage system ready for each residential unit; x Electric vehicle (EV) capable and EV ready parking spaces to facilitate future installation and use of EV chargers; x Low-flow fixtures (showerheads, toilets, kitchen/bathroom faucets); x Low water use vegetation; x Electric heat pumps; x Energy efficient lighting such as light emitting diode (LED) lights; x Lighting controls such as dimmers and motion/occupancy sensors; and x High performance windows and doors (to limit air leakage, promote thermal efficiency, and reduce the transmission of solar heat). 3.2.8 Utilities Water Water would continue to be provided to the Proposed Project Site by EMWD via proposed looped network lateral connections to the existing water mains in Cawston Avenue North, West Esplanade Avenue, and West Seventh Street. The Project has been preliminarily sized to meet the minimum design water pressure of 50 pounds per square inch (psi) at each proposed service point of connection and a 20-psi residual pressure for fire flows. During final design, the Fire Marshal would confirm that fire flow from the existing and new fire hydrants meet the demand for the Proposed Project. New fire hydrants would be installed throughout the Project and at the street intersections along the Project frontages of West Seventh Street, Cawston Avenue North, and West Esplanade Avenue, per EMWD standards. Wastewater The Project wastewater flows would be collected via a proposed sewer system and would be conveyed to EMWD’s San Jacinto Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility, located 1 mile north of the Project Site. The Project’s proposed sewer collection system has been preliminarily sized to convey the sewer flow through a proposed 8-inch sewer main line via gravity from the southern to the northeast corner of the Proposed Project Site. A proposed lift station would move wastewater from the proposed 8-inch main line to a proposed 10-inch sewer main line to be constructed within Seventh Street. The proposed 10-inch sewer main line would then connect to an existing 24-inch gravity sanitary sewer running north in Cawston Avenue North and then east on West Seventh Street. The Project has been designed to be a self-contained system that does not anticipate any future sewer input from other sources. Stormwater Controls The Proposed Project Site will be developed with associated improvements, including improved streets and graded slopes. The runoff from the developed condition would be collected into an on-site storm drain 5.1.i Packet Pg. 205 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 system, which includes two upstream bioretention water quality basins, and flows to a larger stormwater basin located in the northwest corner of the Proposed Project Site. The larger stormwater basin also includes a bioretention water quality basin as well. A submerged pump would be installed at the north side of the basin to send the treated stormwater into Cawston Avenue where water would be conveyed west and off- site and continue down Seventh Street via roadside swale or gutter flow and into the existing City stormwater system, as under existing conditions. Construction of the Proposed Project would also require the contractor to prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) as the Project Site is more than 1 acre. 3.2.9 Construction Timing Construction activities are anticipated to begin in January 2026 and end in January 2029, with phased openings occurring as completed as early as Spring 2029. Construction activity would occur for 8 hours per day, and 5 days per week (Monday through Friday), in accordance with the City’s permitted hours of construction (SJMC Section 8.40.090 Construction activity noise regulations). Construction stages such as demolition, site preparation, grading/excavation, building construction, paving, and architectural coating would occur as the subdivision requires as identified on Table 2: Project Construction Phasing Summary. Construction of the proposed Project would require common construction equipment types. No pile driving would be required. Table 2: Project Construction Phasing Summary Demolition November 2025 – December 2025 Interior grading and road improvements January 2026 – January 2029 Grading for basins, housing pads January 2026 to April 2026 Off-site improvements April 2026 – August 2026 Housing pad improvements, housing construction September 2026 – May 2029 Note: Some phases may overlap, as determined necessary for construction sequencing. 3.2.10 Grading Quantities Grading activities would include an estimated 27,000 cubic yards (cy) of cut, 193,600 cy of fill, and 166,600 cy of import. 3.2.11 Best Management Practices During Construction The following best management practices are incorporated into the Project construction specifications to identity how the Project would conform to Federal, State, and Local regulations: x Construction Water Quality Control. Construction projects that disturb 1 acre of land or more are required to obtain coverage under the NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities (General Construction Permit), which requires the applicant to file a notice of intent (NOI) to discharge stormwater and to prepare and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP includes an overview of the Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would be implemented to prevent soil erosion and discharge of other construction-related pollutants that could contaminate nearby water resources. The Project is more than 1 acre, therefore, the contractor is required to provide an SWPPP. The SWPPP will also address post-construction measures for water quality protection. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 206 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 3.3 Project Characteristics - Operations The Proposed Project would be fully operational in 2029 and would include 419 residential units for approximately 1,453 future residents within the Chacon Farms community, as discussed further in Section 4.14, Population and Housing. The proposed community aims to provide open space areas connected by a network of trails and paths between residences to provide social and recreational opportunities for future residents. A homeowners association would be formed to manage the subdivision facilities. 3.4 Project Approvals The following approvals and permits are required from the City of San Jacinto as part of Case No. PROJ23- 0029 to implement the Proposed Project: x Per San Jacinto Development Code (“SJDC”) Section 17.720.020, a General Plan Amendment to revise the land use designation from VLDR (Very Low Density Residential) to LDR (Low Density Residential) for the Proposed Project Site located at 710 Cawston Avenue North (APNs 432-260-009, 432-260- 026, and 432-260-027); x Per SJDC Section 17.720.020, a Zoning Map Amendment (Zone Change) from the RR Zone (Rural Residential) to the LDR Zone (Residential – Low Density) for the Proposed Project Site; x Per SJDC Section 17.620, a Planned Development Permit (PDP); x Per SJDC Section 17.630.040 approval of Site Plan and Design Review; x Per San Jacinto Municipal Code (“SJMC”) Section 16.25 a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 39076) for the subdivision of the Proposed Project Site into 419 residential lots (for the development of 419 single family homes) and 4 lettered lots. x Per SJDC Section 17.600.090 Environmental Review and approval of the IS/MND; Per SJMC Section 12.20.050, removal of applicable trees within City right-of-way. Other non-discretionary actions anticipated to be taken by the City at the staff level as part of the Proposed Project include: x Review and approval of all off-site infrastructure plans, including street and utility improvements pursuant to the conditions of approval; x Review all on-site plans, including grading and on-site utilities; and x Per SJDC Section 17.600.100 approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (“WQMP”). 5.1.i Packet Pg. 207 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Figure 1 – Regional Vicinity 5.1.i Packet Pg. 208 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Fi g u r e 2 S i t e L o c a t i o n A e r i a l V i e w No t t o s c a l e So u r c e Go o g l e E a r t h P r o KarpickStreet 5. 1 i Pa c k e t P g 2 0 9Attachment: MitigatedNegativeDeclaration (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Figure 3 – Site Location, USGS 5.1.i Packet Pg. 210 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Fi g u r e 4 S i t e P l a n S c h e m a t i c T T M 3 9 0 7 6 5. 1 i Pa c k e t P g 2 1 1Attachment: MitigatedNegativeDeclaration (ChaconFarms (PROJ23-0029)) Figure 5 – Concept Landscaping Plan 5.1.i Packet Pg. 212 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 4. Environmental Impacts 4.1 Aesthetics 4.1.1 Impact Analysis Impact Less Than Significant Impact Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c) In nonurbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from a publicly accessible vantage point). X X Discussion a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Less Than Significant Impact. As stated in the San Jacinto General Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report, scenic vistas visible in the City include the Lakeview Mountains to the west, the San Jacinto Mountain foothills to the northeast, and the San Timoteo badlands to the northwest (San Jacinto 2022c). The Proposed Project Site is situated in a relatively low and flat area in the southwestern portion of the City. Public vantage points of these scenic vistas are from Cawston Avenue and 7th Avenue. Cawson Avenue is on the east side of Project, site so views of the San Jacinto Mountains looking to the east will remain visible after development of the Project. However, views of the Lakeview Mountains looking to the west will be partially blocked by the Project post-development. The San Timoteo Badlands are not visible from Cawston Avenue or 7th Street because they are approximately 12 miles away, and views are already blocked by intervening topography and development. From 7th Street, views of the Lakeview Mountains and San Jacinto Mountains would not be blocked by the Project because these views are visible to pedestrians and motorists traveling east and west along 7th Street, and the new structures will be located on the south side of the roadway. Additionally, the proposed structures are limited to 40% lot coverage, a maximum height of 40 feet, and three stories tall, and would have setbacks between structures consistent with the design requirements of the SJMC. For these reasons, views of the Lakeview Mountains and Jacinto Mountains would still be visible from the internal public streets. The Project would also not significantly alter any 5.1.i Packet Pg. 213 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 views from public parks or open space areas. Therefore, the Project would not result in a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista, and impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. Based on the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) California State Scenic Highway System Map, there are no Officially Designated State scenic highways within the Project vicinity (Caltrans 2023). The closest Eligible highway is a portion of SR-74 from Interstate 5 at San Juan Capistrano to SR-111, located approximately 5 miles south of the Proposed Project Site at the nearest point1. Therefore, the Project Site does not exist within or near a State scenic highway. Due to distance, topographic changes, and intervening development, the Proposed Project Site is not visible from this segment of SR-74. Additionally, none of the streets surrounding the Project Site are identified in the San Jacinto General Plan as being a local scenic roadway. The Project Site is fully disturbed with agricultural, limited residential uses, and a significant number of invasive tree species, and does not contain areas with native vegetation. The residential uses on the Project Site were found to not be historically significant refer to Section 4.5.2 in this document). Therefore, the proposed Project would not have an adverse effect on scenic resources (including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway) or a locally designated rural street or scenic corridor. There would be no impact, and no mitigation is required. c) In nonurbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? Less than Significant Impact. The Project vicinity is characterized by a mix of both non-urbanized and urbanized areas. Surrounding land uses include a mix of undeveloped, rural residential, low-density residential, and heavy agriculture uses. The Project has been designed to be consistent with the surrounding area and development. Single family homes within Chacon Farms shall creatively use architecture forward” designs, landscaping, and other innovative neighborhood design techniques to create a visually interesting street scene and identifiable neighborhood character. As the Project has been designed to match the existing visual character within the Project vicinity context, the Project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less than Significant Impact. As stated above, the area surrounding the Project is developed with agricultural and limited residential uses that provide various levels of existing nighttime lighting. Operation of the Proposed Project would introduce new sources of residential and street lighting into the Proposed Project Site. However, the proposed lighting would be similar to the type and level of existing lighting provided in the Project vicinity and be designed to direct light downward within the Proposed Project Site to minimize spillover illumination and glare consistent with the City’s Development Code Section 17.300.080 – Outdoor Light and Glare (San Jacinto 2022d). In addition, the exteriors of the proposed residential structures would be constructed of low-glare materials. No 1 (Caltrans “List of eligible and officially designated State Scenic Highways (XLS), https://dot.ca.gov/programs/design/lap- landscape-architecture-and-community-livability/lap-liv-i-scenic-highways, accessed February 9, 2025) 5.1.i Packet Pg. 214 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 prefabricated metal buildings would be allowed, and metal would only be utilized minimally in accent features. Therefore, potential light and glare impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. 4.1.2 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Aesthetics apply to the Proposed Project. 4.1.3 Conclusion There are less than significant potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Aesthetics, and no mitigation would be required. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 215 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources 4.2.1 Impact Analysis Impact Does Not Apply In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are signi tment of Forestry dology provided in Forest d by the California Air Resources Board. Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the X X forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Timberland Production (as defined by Government X X conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or X Discussion a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? Less Than Significant Impact. Based on review of the California Important Farmland Finder Map, prepared by the California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program FMMP), the Proposed Project Site is located on Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance (FMMP 2023). As stated in the General Plan Draft EIR, although there are existing agricultural activities within the City, the San Jacinto General Plan Land Use Map does not designate lands specifically for agricultural use. Areas identified as Prime Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance are mostly designated for a mix of residential and non-residential development. According to the General Plan, future development consistent with the General Plan along with changes in the economy are expected to 5.1.i Packet Pg. 216 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 result in the conversion of many of these Prime Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance areas to urban uses. Because there are no exclusive agricultural land use designations included as part of the General Plan, the General Plan identifies that future development, such as the proposed Project, could convert existing agricultural resources and Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, and Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural uses (City, 2022). Although the Project would convert areas of Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural uses, the City General Plan anticipated future development converting these uses. Therefore, impacts related to conversion of farmland would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Less Than Significant Impact. As stated above, the Proposed Project Site is located on Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance. As stated in the City of San Jacinto General Plan Draft EIR, land use designations for these parcels allow for non-agricultural uses including mixed-use and residential. Additionally, lands within the surrounding area are identified for urban development. Because there are no exclusive agricultural land use designations included as part of the General Plan, the General Plan identified that future development, such as the Proposed Project, and changes in the economy could result in conversion of preserved agricultural properties to urban uses (City, 2022). There is no Williamson Act contract for the Proposed Project Parcels, according to the Applicant’s due diligence surveys and title reports performed prior to purchase. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not conflict with existing agricultural use as the City anticipated development to convert agricultural land. The Project would request a Zoning Map Amendment (Zone Change) per the SJDC Section 17.720.020 from RR Zone (Rural Residential) to the LDR Zone (Residential – Low Density) for the Proposed Project Site. The Project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? No Impact. As stated in the General Plan Draft EIR, there are no forest lands within the City, nor are there suitable environmental conditions for forest land to be developed. Therefore, there are no forest lands on the Proposed Project Site and implementation of the Project would not result in the loss of forest land or convert forest land to non-forest use; no mitigation is required. d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. As stated in the General Plan Draft EIR, there are no forest lands within the City, nor are there suitable environmental conditions for forest land to be developed. Therefore, there are no forest lands on the Proposed Project Site and implementation of the Proposed Project would not result in the loss of forest land or convert forest land to non-forest use; no mitigation is required. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to nonagricultural use or the conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed previously, the Proposed Project site is located on Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance. The construction and operation of the Project would be confined to the Project footprint and would not cause offsite conversion of farmland or forest land to non-agriculture uses or non-forest uses. And while the Proposed Project Site is occupied by agricultural operations ,the Proposed Project is consistent with the City’s current land use and zoning for the Project Site. Additionally, General Plan Draft EIR addressed future development, such as the Proposed Project, would result in the conversion of preserved agricultural properties to urban uses 5.1.i Packet Pg. 217 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 San Jacinto 2022c). As the General Plan anticipated such change from Farmland to non-agricultural uses, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. 4.2.2 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Agriculture and Forestry Resources apply to the Proposed Project. 4.2.3 Conclusion There are less than significant potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Agriculture and Forestry Services, and no mitigation would be required. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 218 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 4.3 Air Quality Information and analysis in this section is derived from the documents incorporated by reference as identified in Section 1.3 of this document and the Air Quality and Greenhouse Report prepared included as Appendix A-1 – Chacon Farms, Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study, MD Acoustics, April 28, 2025. A Health Risk Assessment (HRA) was prepared to assess the potential health risks associated with construction of the Project within proximity to other nearby residential uses, and is included as Appendix A-2 – Health Risk Assessment for the Chacon Farms Project, City of San Jacinto , MD Acoustics, April 28, 2025. 4.3.1 Regulatory Setting Federal Standards The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for global, international, and interstate air pollution issues and policies. The EPA sets national vehicle and stationary source emission standards, oversees approval of all State Implementation Plans, provides research and guidance for air pollution programs, and sets National Air Quality Standards, also known as federal standards. There are six common air pollutants, called criteria pollutants, which were identified from the provisions of the Clean Air Act of 1970, including ozone, nitrogen dioxide, lead, particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide. The federal standards were set to protect public health, including that of sensitive individuals; thus, the standards continue to change as more medical research is available regarding the health effects of the criteria pollutants. Primary federal standards are the levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of safety, to protect public health. A State Implementation Plan is a document prepared by each state describing existing air quality conditions and measures that will be followed to attain and maintain federal standards. The State Implementation Plan for the State of California is administered by the Air Resources Board (ARB), which has overall responsibility for statewide air quality maintenance and air pollution prevention. California’s State Implementation Plan incorporates individual federal attainment plans for regional air districts—air district prepares their federal attainment plan, which sent to ARB to be approved and incorporated into the California State Implementation Plan. Federal attainment plans include the technical foundation for understanding air quality e.g., emission inventories and air quality monitoring), control measures and strategies, and enforcement mechanisms. Federal and state ambient air quality standards are summarized in Table 3: Ambient Air Quality Standards. Table 3: Ambient Air Quality Standards 1 4 7 Ozone (O3 Photometry Primary g/m3 g/m3 Beta Attenuation m3 Primary Separation andMean g/m3 5.1.i Packet Pg. 219 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Pollutant Averaging Time California Standards1 4 7 Fine Particulate Matter 8 g/m3 Primary Separation and g/m3 g/m3 g/m3 g/m3 Infrared Photometry NDIR) g/m3 Infrared NDIR) g/m3 g/m3 g/m3 NO2 g/m3 nce g/m3 ence Mean (357 g/m3 g/m3) Primary 2) 10 g/m3 Ultraviolet Fluorescence g/m3 Spectro- Method) 1300 3 g/m3) (for certain 10 Mean (for certain 10 g/m3 Absorption g/m3 for certain 12 Primary Sampler Atomic Absorption g/m3 13 and No National Standards g/m3 g/m3) g/m3) 5.1.i Packet Pg. 220 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Notes: 1. California standards for ozone, carbon monoxide (except 8-hour Lake Tahoe), sulfur dioxide (1 and 24 hour), nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5, and visibility reducing particles), are values that are not to be exceeded. All others are not to be equaled or exceeded. California ambient air quality standards are listed in the Table of Standards in Section 70200 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations. 2. National standards (other than ozone, particulate matter, and those based on annual arithmetic mean) are not to be exceeded more than once a year. The ozone standard is attained when the fourth highest 8-hour concentration measured at each site in a year, averaged over three years, is equal to or less than the standard. For PM10, the 24 hour standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with a 24-hour average concentration above 150 g/m3 is equal to or less than one. For PM2.5, the 24 hour standard is attained when 98 percent of the daily concentrations, averaged over three years, are equal to or less than the standard. Contact the U.S. EPA for further clarification and current national policies. 3. Concentration expressed first in units in which it was promulgated. Equivalent units given in parentheses are based upon a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr. Most measurements of air quality are to be corrected to a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr; ppm in this table refers to ppm by volume, or micromoles of pollutant per mole of gas. 4. Any equivalent measurement method which can be shown to the satisfaction of the ARB to give equivalent results at or near the level of the air quality standard may be used. 5. National Primary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of safety to protect the public health. 6. National Secondary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary to protect the public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects of a pollutant. 7. Reference method as described by the U.S. EPA. An “equivalent method” of measurement may be used but must have a consistent relationship to the reference method” and must be approved by the U.S. EPA. 8. On December 14, 2012, the national annual PM2.5 primary standard was lowered from 15 g/m3 to 12.0 g/m3. The existing national 24-hour PM2.5 standards (primary and secondary) were retained at 35 g/m3, as was the annual secondary standard of 15 g/m3. The existing 24-hour PM10 standards (primary and secondary) of 150 g/m3 also were retained. The form of the annual primary and secondary standards is the annual mean, averaged over 3 years. 9. To attain the 1-hour national standard, the 3-year average of the annual 98th percentile of the 1-hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 100 ppb. Note that the national 1-hour standard is in units of parts per billion (ppb). California standards are in units of parts per million (ppm). To directly compare the national 1-hour standard to the California standards the units can be converted from ppb to ppm. In this case, the national standard of 100 ppb is identical to 0.100 ppm. 10. On June 2, 2010, a new 1-hour SO2 standard was established and the existing 24-hour and annual primary standards were revoked. To attain the 1- hour national standard, the 3-year average of the annual 99th percentile of the 1-hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 75 ppb. The 1971 SO2 national standards (24-hour and annual) remain in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2010 standard, except that in areas designated nonattainment for the 1971 standards, the 1971 standards remain in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2010 standards are approved. Note that the 1-hour national standard is in units of parts per billion (ppb). California standards are in units of parts per million (ppm). To directly compare the 1-hour national standard to the California standard the units can be converted to ppm. In this case, the national standard of 75 ppb is identical to 0.075 ppm. 11. The ARB has identified lead and vinyl chloride as 'toxic air contaminants' with no threshold level of exposure for adverse health effects determined. These actions allow for the implementation of control measures at levels below the ambient concentrations specified for these pollutants. 12. The national standard for lead was revised on October 15, 2008 to a rolling 3-month average. The 1978 lead standard 1.5 g/m3 as a quarterly average) remains in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2008 standard, except that in areas designated nonattainment for the 1978 standard, the 1978 standard remains in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2008 standard are approved. 13. In 1989, the ARB converted both the general statewide 10-mile visibility standard and the Lake Tahoe 30-mile visibility standard to instrumental equivalents, which are "extinction of 0.23 per kilometer" and "extinction of 0.07 per kilometer" for the statewide and Lake Tahoe Air Basin standards, respectively. Several pollutants listed are not addressed in this analysis. Analysis of lead is not included because the Project is not anticipated to emit lead. Visibility-reducing particles are not explicitly addressed in this analysis because particulate matter is addressed. The Project is not expected to generate or be exposed to vinyl chloride 5.1.i Packet Pg. 221 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 because proposed Project uses do not utilize the chemical processes that create this pollutant and there are no such uses in the Project vicinity. The proposed Project is not expected to cause exposure to hydrogen sulfide because it would not generate hydrogen sulfide in any substantial quantity. South Coast Air Quality Management District The Proposed Project Site is located within the Southern California Air Basin (SoCAB) and is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD is responsible for controlling emissions primarily from stationary sources. SCAQMD maintains air quality monitoring stations throughout the basin. SCAQMD, in coordination with the Southern California Association of Governments, is also responsible for developing, updating, and implementing the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the basin. An AQMP is a plan prepared and implemented by an air pollution district for a county or region designated as nonattainment of the federal and/or California ambient air quality standards. The term nonattainment area is used to refer to an air basin where one or more ambient air quality standards are exceeded. Every three (3) years the SCAQMD prepares a new AQMP, updating the previous plan and having a 20-year horizon. On March 23, 2017, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) approved the 2016 AQMP. The 2016 AQMP is a regional blueprint for achieving the federal air quality standards and healthful air. The 2016 AQMP includes both stationary and mobile source strategies to ensure that rapidly approaching attainment deadlines are met, that public health is protected to the maximum extent feasible, and that the region is not faced with burdensome sanctions if the Plan is not approved or if the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) are not met on time. As with every AQMP, a comprehensive analysis of emissions, meteorology, atmospheric chemistry, regional growth projections, and the impact of existing control measures is updated with the latest data and methods. The most significant air quality challenge in the Basin is to reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions sufficiently to meet the upcoming ozone standard deadlines. The primary goal of this AQMP is to meet clean air standards and protect public health, including ensuring benefits to environmental justice and disadvantaged communities. Now that the plan has been approved by CARB, it has been forwarded to the EPA for its review. If approved by EPA, the plan becomes federally enforceable. SCAQMD adopted the 2022 AQMP on December 2, 2022, to address the attainment of the 2015 8-hour ozone standard (70 parts per billion [ppb]) for South Coast Air Basin and Coachella Valley. To meet this standard, the AQMP determined NOx emissions must be reduced by 67 percent more than is required by adopted rules and regulations by 2037. The control strategy for the 2022 AQMP includes aggressive new regulations and the development of incentive programs to support early deployment of advanced technologies. The two key areas for incentive programs are (1) promoting widespread deployment of available zero-emission (ZE) and low NOx technologies and (2) developing new ZE and ultra-low NOx technologies for use in cases where the technology is not currently available. SCAQMD will prioritize distribution of incentive funding in environmental justice areas and seek opportunities to focus benefits on the most disadvantaged communities. Cost-effectiveness and affordability will be further considered during the rulemaking or incentive program development process. The AQMP for the basin establishes a program of rules and regulations administered by SCAQMD to obtain attainment of the state and federal standards. Some of the rules and regulations that apply to this Project include, but are not limited to, the following: x SCAQMD Rule 402 - prohibits a person from discharging from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or 5.1.i Packet Pg. 222 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. x SCAQMD Rule 403 - governs emissions of fugitive dust during construction and operation activities. Compliance with this rule is achieved through application of standard Best Management Practices, such as application of water or chemical stabilizers to disturbed soils, covering haul vehicles, restricting vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour, sweeping loose dirt from paved site access roadways, cessation of construction activity when winds exceed 25 mph, and establishing a permanent ground cover on finished sites. x SCAQMD Rule 1113 - governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of architectural coating and limits the VOC content in paints and paint solvents. This rule regulates the VOC content of paints available during construction. Therefore, all paints and solvents used during construction and operation of project must comply with Rule 1113. x Idling Diesel Vehicle Trucks - Idling for more than 5 minutes in any one location is prohibited within California borders. x Rule 2702 - establishes a voluntary air quality investment program from which SCAQMD can collect funds from parties that desire certified greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions, pool those funds, and use them to purchase or fund GHG emission reduction projects within two years, unless extended by the Governing Board. Local Climate and Meteorology Dominant airflows provide the driving mechanism for transport and dispersion of air pollution. The mountains surrounding the region form natural horizontal barriers to the dispersion of air contaminants. Air pollution created in the coastal areas and around the Los Angeles area is transported inland until it reaches the mountains where the combination of mountains and inversion layers generally prevent further dispersion. This poor ventilation results in a gradual degradation of air quality from the coastal areas to inland areas. Air stagnation may occur during the early evening and early morning periods of transition between day and nighttime flows. The region also experiences periods of hot, dry winds from the desert, known as Santa Ana winds. If the Santa Ana winds are strong, they can surpass the sea breeze, which blows from the ocean to the land, and carry the suspended dust and pollutants out to the ocean. If the winds are weak, they are opposed by the sea breeze and cause stagnation, resulting in high pollution events. The annual average temperature varies little throughout much of the basin, ranging from the low to middle 60s, measured in degrees Fahrenheit (°F). With more pronounced oceanic influence, coastal areas show less variability in annual minimum and maximum temperatures than inland areas where the Proposed Project Site is located. The majority of the annual rainfall in the basin occurs between November and April. Summer rainfall is minimal and is generally limited to scattered thunderstorms in the coastal regions and slightly heavier showers in the eastern portion of the basin along the coastal side of the mountains. Year-to-year patterns in rainfall are unpredictable because of fluctuations in the weather. Temperature inversions limit the vertical depth through which pollution can be mixed. Among the most common temperature inversions in the basin are radiation inversions, which form on clear winter nights when cold air off mountains sink to the valley floor while the air aloft over the valley remains warm. These inversions, in conjunction with calm winds, trap pollutants near the source. Other types of temperature inversions that affect the basin include marine, subsidence, and high-pressure inversions. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 223 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Local Air Quality The SCAQMD is divided into 38 air-monitoring areas with a designated ambient air monitoring station representative of each area. The Proposed Project Site is located in the City of San Jacinto in the Hemet/San Jacinto Valley Source Receptor Area (SRA 28). The nearest air monitoring station to the Proposed Project Site is the Banning Airport Station. The Banning Airport Station is located approximately 13 miles northeast of the Proposed Project Site, at 200 South Hathaway Street, Banning. However, this location does not provide all ambient weather data. Therefore, additional data was pulled from the SCAQMD historical data for the Hemet/San Jacinto Area for both sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide to provide the existing levels. Table 4: Local Area Air Quality Levels from the Banning Monitoring Stations presents the monitored pollutant levels within the vicinity. However, it should be noted that due to the air monitoring station distance from the Proposed Project Site, recorded air pollution levels at the air monitoring station reflect with varying degrees of accuracy, local air quality conditions at the Proposed Project Site. The monitoring data presented shows that ozone and particulate matter (PM10) are the air pollutants of primary concern in the Project area, which are detailed further in Table 4. Table 4: Local Air Quality Levels from the Banning Monitoring Stations 2 Ozone: Maximum 1-Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.150 0.139 0.116 Days > CAAQS (0.09 ppm) 29 41 30 Maximum 8-Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.115 0.116 0.100 Days > NAAQS (0.07 ppm) 68 80 56 Days > CAAQS (0.070 ppm) 71 82 59 Carbon Monoxide: Maximum 1-Hour Concentration (ppm) * * * Days > NAAQS (20 ppm) * * * Maximum 8-Hour Concentration (ppm) * * * Days > NAAQS (9 ppm) * * * Nitrogen Dioxide: Maximum 1-Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.051 0.057 0.052 Days > NAAQS (0.25 ppm) 0 0 0 Sulfur Dioxide: Maximum 1-Hour Concentration (ppm) * * * Days > CAAQS (0.25 ppm) * * * Inhalable Particulates (PM10): Maximum 24-Hour Concentration (ug/m3) 69.3 48.6 52.4 Days > NAAQS (150 ug/m3) 0 0 0 Days > CAAQS (50 ug/m3) 1 0 0 Annual Average (ug/m3) 21.2 21.2 22.5 Annual > NAAQS (50 ug/m3) No No No Annual > CAAQS (20 ug/m3) Ultra-Fine Particulates (PM2.5): Maximum 24-Hour Concentration (ug/m3) 46.7 40.9 37.9 Days > NAAQS (35 ug/m3) Annual Average (ug/m3) 10.5 11.7 9.4 Annual > NAAQS (15 ug/m3) No No No Annual > CAAQS (12 ug/m3) No No No 5.1.i Packet Pg. 224 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Pollutant (Standard)2 1. Source: obtained from https://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/air-quality-data-studies/historical-data-by-year and/or https://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/topfour/topfour1.php CAAQS = California Ambient Air Quality Standard; NAAQS = National Ambient Air Quality Standard; ppm = parts per million Attainment Status The EPA and the ARB designate air basins where ambient air quality standards are exceeded as nonattainment” areas. If standards are met, the area is designated as an “attainment” area. If there is inadequate or inconclusive data to make a definitive attainment designation, they are considered unclassified.” National nonattainment areas are further designated as marginal, moderate, serious, severe, or extreme as a function of deviation from standards. Each standard has a different definition, or ‘form’ of what constitutes attainment, based on specific air quality statistics. For example, the Federal 8-hour CO standard is not to be exceeded more than once per year; therefore, an area is in attainment of the CO standard if no more than one 8-hour ambient air monitoring values exceeds the threshold per year. In contrast, the federal annual PM2.5 standard is met if the three-year average of the annual average PM2.5 concentration is less than or equal to the standard. Table 5: South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status, lists the attainment status for the criteria pollutants in the basin. Table 5: South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status 1 2 3 1979 1-Hour Ozone4 1-Hour 0.12 ppm) Nonattainment Extreme) 11/15/2010 Not attained4 Nonattainment 2 2 Attainment g/m3) 8 g/m3) 8 g/m3 9 9 5.1.i Packet Pg. 225 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Pollutant Averaging Time National Standards1 2 3 1 Obtained from Draft 2012 AQMP, SCAQMD, 2012. EPA often only declares Nonattainment areas; everywhere else is listed as Unclassified/Attainment or Unclassifiable. 2 A design value below the NAAQS for data through the full year or smog season prior to the attainment date is typically required for attainment demonstration. 3 Obtained from http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. 4 1-hour O3 standard (0.13 ppm) was revoked, effective June 15, 2005; however, the Basin has not attained this standard based on 2008-2010 data has some continuing obligations under the former standard. 5 1997 8-hour O3 standard (0.08 ppm) was reduced (0.075 ppm), effective May 27, 2008; the 1997 O3 standard and most related implementation rules remain in place until the 1997 standard is revoked by U.S. EPA. 6 New NO2 1-hour standard, effective August 2, 2010; attainment designations June, 2013; annual NO2 standard retained. 7 The 1971 annual and 24-hour SO2 standards were revoked, effective August 23, 2010; however, these 1971 standards will remain in effect until one year after U.S. EPA promulgates area designations for the 2010 SO2 1-hour standard. Sensitive Receptors Sensitive receptors are considered land uses or other types of population groups that are more sensitive to air pollution than others due to their exposure. Sensitive population groups include children, the elderly, the acutely and chronically ill, and those with cardio-respiratory diseases. For CEQA purposes, a sensitive receptor for air quality would be a location where a sensitive individual could remain for 24 hours or longer, such as residencies, hospitals, and schools (etc.). The closest existing sensitive receptors (to the site area) for purposes of air quality are existing single-family residences located approximately 100 feet to the north. Significance Criteria Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines states that the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district may be relied upon to make significance determinations. The SCAQMD has established significance thresholds to assess the regional and localized impacts of Project-related air pollutant emissions, as shown below. R The following CEQA significance thresholds for construction emissions are established for the Basin by the SCAQMD: x 75 pounds per day (lbs/day) of VOC x 100 lbs/day of NOx x 550 lbs/day of CO x 150 lbs/day of PM10 x 55 lbs/day of PM2.5 x 150 lbs/day of SO2 Local Microscale Concentration Standards The significance of localized project impacts under CEQA depends on whether ambient CO levels in the vicinity of the Project are above or below State and federal CO standards. If ambient levels are below the standards, a project is considered to have a significant impact if project emissions result in an exceedance of 5.1.i Packet Pg. 226 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 one or more of these standards. If ambient levels already exceed a State or federal standard, project emissions are considered significant if they increase 1-hour CO concentrations by 1.0 parts per million (ppm) or more or 8-hour CO concentrations by 0.45 ppm or more. The following are applicable local emission concentration standards for CO: x California State 1-hour CO standard of 20.0 ppm x California State 8-hour CO standard of 9.0 ppm L Project-related construction air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the Project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the South Coast Air Basin. In order to assess local air quality impacts the SCAQMD has developed Localized Significant Thresholds (LSTs) to assess the Project-related air emissions in the Project vicinity. The SCAQMD has also provided Final Localized Significant Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology), June 2003, which details the methodology to analyze local air emission impacts. The LST Methodology found that the primary emissions of concern are NO2, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. The emission thresholds were calculated based on the Hemet/San Jacinto Valley Source Receptor Area and a disturbance of 4 acres per day at a distance of 25 meters (82 feet), for construction and 5 acres a day for screening of localized operational emissions 4.3.2 Impact Analysis Impact Less Than Impact Does Not Apply Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. X X that are experienced from a publicly accessible vantage point). X X Discussion a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? No Impact. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that "new or amended General Plan Elements including land use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for consistency with the AQMP." Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not 5.1.i Packet Pg. 227 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 required. A proposed project should be considered to be consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The current regional plan applicable to the Project is the SCAQMD’s 2022 AQMP, discussed in further detail above. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency: 1. Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. 2. Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP in 2016 or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase. Both of these criteria are evaluated below. Criterion 1 - Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations – Based on the air quality modeling analysis discussed further below and in Appendix A-1, short-term construction impacts would not result in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD regional and local thresholds of significance. Additionally, as discussed further below and in Appendix A-1, long-term operations impacts would not result in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance. Therefore, the Proposed Project is not projected to contribute to the exceedance of any air pollutant concentration standards and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the first criterion. Criterion 2 - Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP – Consistency with the AQMP assumptions is determined by performing an analysis of the proposed Project with the assumptions in the AQMP. The emphasis of this criterion is to ensure that the analyses conducted for the proposed Project are based on the same forecasts as the AQMP. The 2024-2050 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), prepared by SCAG and adopted on April 4, 2024, includes chapters on: the challenges in a changing region, creating a plan for our future, and the road to greater mobility and sustainable growth. These chapters currently respond directly to federal and state requirements placed on SCAG. Local governments are required to use these as the basis of their plans for purposes of consistency with applicable regional plans under CEQA. For the Proposed Project, the City of San Jacinto Land Use Plans define the assumptions that are represented in the AQMP. The City of San Jacinto General Plan identifies the land use designation of the site as Very Low Density Residential. The Proposed Project is a residential development. The Proposed Project includes the application for a General Plan Amendment to revise the land use designation from VLDR (Very Low Density Residential) to LDR (Low Density Residential) and a Zoning Map Amendment (Zone Change) from the RR Zone (Rural Residential) to the LDR Zone (Residential – Low Density). Therefore, as the Proposed Project seeks to maintain the residential land uses, instead of changing them to commercial or industrial, the Proposed Project would not result in an inconsistency with the land use designation in the City’s General Plan and is not anticipated to exceed the AQMP assumptions for the Proposed Project Site. As such, the Project is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the second criterion. b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Less Than Significant Impact. A project may have a significant impact where project-related emissions would exceed federal, State, or regional standards or thresholds, or where project-related emissions would substantially contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. The SCAQMD has 5.1.i Packet Pg. 228 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 developed construction and operations thresholds, as described above, to determine whether projects would potentially result in contributing toward a violation of ambient air quality standards. Construction Emissions – Regional Typical emission rates from construction activities were obtained from the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2022.1.1.22 CalEEMod is a computer model published by the SCAQMD for estimating air pollutant emissions. The CalEEMod program uses the EMFAC2017 EMission Factor) computer program to calculate the emission rates specific for the southwestern portion of Riverside County for construction-related employee vehicle trips and the OFFROAD2011 computer program to calculate emission rates for heavy truck operations. EMFAC2017 and OFFROAD2011 are computer programs generated by CARB that calculates composite emission rates for vehicles. Emission rates are reported by the program in grams per trip and grams per mile or grams per running hour. Using CalEEMod, the peak daily air pollutant emissions were calculated and presented below. These emissions represent the highest level of emissions for each of the construction phases in terms of air pollutant emissions. Table 6: Regional Significance – Construction Emissions (pounds/day) identified the emissions for proposed Project (Appendix A-1). In addition, SCAQMD Rule 402 and 403 were incorporated into the model, and are not considered mitigation measures as the Project is, by default, required to incorporate these rules during construction Table 6: Regional Significance – Construction Emissions (pounds/day) 2 Demolition On-Site2 2.40 22.20 19.90 0.03 1.52 0.93 Off-Site3 0.08 0.91 1.36 0.01 0.41 0.12 Total 2.48 23.11 21.26 0.04 1.93 1.05 Site Preparation On-Site2 3.31 31.60 30.20 0.05 9.04 5.20 Off-Site3 0.07 0.08 1.02 0.00 0.23 0.05 Total 3.38 31.68 31.22 0.05 9.27 5.25 Grading On-Site2 3.20 29.70 28.30 0.06 4.87 2.57 Off-Site3 0.41 23.10 6.63 0.13 6.25 1.90 Total 3.61 52.80 34.93 0.19 11.12 4.47 Building Construction On-Site2 1.13 10.40 13.00 0.02 0.43 0.40 Off-Site3 0.71 2.31 12.08 0.01 2.37 0.59 Total 1.84 12.71 25.08 0.03 2.80 0.99 Paving On-Site2 0.74 6.94 9.95 0.01 0.30 0.27 Off-Site3 0.07 0.54 1.15 0.00 0.34 0.09 Total 0.81 7.48 11.10 0.01 0.64 0.36 Architectural Coating On-Site2 56.91 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 Off-Site3 0.11 0.12 1.51 0.00 0.39 0.09 Total 57.02 1.25 1.51 0.00 0.41 0.11 Total of overlapping phases4 59.67 21.44 37.69 0.04 3.85 1.46 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 5.1.i Packet Pg. 229 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Activity Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) VOC NOx CO SO2 Exceeds Thresholds No No No No No No Notes: 1 Source: CalEEMod Version 2022.1.1.22 2 On-site emissions from equipment operated on-site that is not operated on public roads. 3 Off-site emissions from equipment operated on public roads. 4 Construction, architectural coatings and paving phases may overlap. As shown in Table 6, the construction emissions for the Proposed Project would not exceed the SCAQMD’s daily emission thresholds at the regional level, and therefore would be considered less than significant. Construction Emissions – Localized Significance Thresholds In addition to the mass daily emissions thresholds established by the SCAQMD, short-term local impacts to nearby sensitive receptors from on-site emissions of NO2, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 are examined based on SCAQMD LST methodology. The SCAQMD has published a “Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds.” CalEEMod calculates construction emissions based on the number of equipment hours and the maximum daily disturbance activity possible for each piece of equipment. In order to compare CalEEMod reported emissions against the localized significance threshold lookup tables, the CEQA document should contain in its project design features or its mitigation measures the following parameters: 1. The off-road equipment list (including type of equipment, horsepower, and hours of operation) assumed for the day of construction activity with maximum emissions. 2. The maximum number of acres disturbed on the peak day. 3. Any emission control devices added onto off-road equipment. 4. Specific dust suppression techniques used on the day of construction activity with maximum emissions. The construction equipment showing the equipment associated with the maximum area of disturbance was assumed to be 4 acres per day for the previously proposed project (Table 7: Construction Equipment Assumptions), and no changes in equipment are anticipated for the currently proposed Project. Table 7: Construction Equipment Assumptions Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 0.5 1.5 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 0.5 2.0 Total Per Phase 3.5 Grading Graders 1 0.5 0.5 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 0.5 0.5 Scrapers 2 1.0 2.0 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 0.5 1.0 Total Per Phase 4.0 Notes: Source: MD Acoustics 2024. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 230 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 The local air quality emissions from construction were analyzed using the SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Localized Significance Threshold Look-up Tables and the methodology described in the Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, prepared by SCAQMD, revised July 2008. The Look-up Tables were developed by the SCAQMD in order to readily determine if the daily emissions of CO, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5 from the Proposed Project could result in a significant impact to the local air quality. The emission thresholds were based on the Hemet/San Jacinto Valley source receptor area and a disturbance of 4 acres per day at a distance of 25 meters (82 feet). The closest receptors are located 30 meters to the north of the site. The 4-acre threshold is interpolated from the 2- and 5-acre thresholds. As shown in Table 8: Localized Significance – Construction, none of the analyzed criteria pollutants for the Proposed Project would exceed the local emissions thresholds at the nearest sensitive receptors. Therefore, a less than significant local air quality impact would occur from construction of the Proposed Project. No mitigation is required. Table 8: Localized Significance – Construction 1 Demolition 22.20 19.90 1.52 0.93 Site Preparation 31.60 30.20 9.04 5.20 Grading 29.70 28.30 4.87 2.57 Building Construction 10.40 13.00 0.43 0.40 Paving 6.94 9.95 0.30 0.27 Architectural Coating 1.13 0.00 0.02 0.02 Total of overlapping phases 18.47 22.95 0.75 0.69 SCAQMD Threshold for 25 meters (82 feet) or less2 325.3 1,676.7 11.0 6.7 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Notes: 1 Source: Calculated from CalEEMod and SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Look-up Tables for 4 acres in Hemet/San Jacinto Source Receptor Area (SRA 28). Project will disturb a maximum of 4.0 acres per day (see Table 7). Long-Term Operational Emissions Operational or long-term emissions occur would over the life of the Project. Mobile, area, and energy sources generate operational emissions. Area source emissions arise from consumer product usage, heaters that consume natural gas, gasoline-powered landscape equipment, and architectural coatings painting). Mobile source emissions from motor vehicles are the largest single long-term source of air pollutants from the operation of the Project. The operational emissions were estimated using the latest version of CalEEMod, as shown in Appendix A-1. Mobile Sources: Mobile sources include emissions from the additional vehicle miles generated from the proposed Project. The vehicle trips associated with the proposed Project are based upon the trip generation rates given in the ITE trip generation manual. The traffic analysis shows a trip generation rate of approximately 3,952 trips per day (Appendix H). 5.1.i Packet Pg. 231 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 The program then applies the emission factors for each trip which is provided by the EMFAC2017 model to determine the vehicular traffic pollutant emissions. The CalEEMod default trip lengths were used in this analysis, as shown in Appendix A-1. Area Sources: Area sources include emissions from consumer products, landscape equipment and architectural coatings. Landscape maintenance includes fuel combustion emissions from equipment such as lawn mowers, rototillers, shredders/grinders, blowers, trimmers, chain saws, and hedge trimmers, as well as air compressors, generators, and pumps. As specifics were not known about the landscaping equipment fleet, CalEEMod defaults were used to estimate emissions from landscaping equipment, as shown in Appendix A-1. Per SCAQMD Rule 1113 as amended on June 3, 2011, the architectural coatings that would be applied after January 1, 2014 will be limited to an average of 50 grams per liter or less and the CalEEMod model default was utilized as the new model takes this rule into account. Energy Usage: CalEEMod defaults were utilized to determine the approximate energy usage, as shown in Appendix A-1. The Project will be 100 percent electric. Solar photovoltaic panels have been included in the analysis per Title 24 requirements (Part 6 – Section 110.10). The potential air quality impacts of created by the Proposed Project’s long-term operations were calculated, and the highest emissions from either summer or winter are summarized in Table 9: Regional Significance – Unmitigated Operational Emissions. Table 9: Regional Significance – Unmitigated Operational Emissions 1 Area Sources2 21.00 0.23 23.80 0.00 0.01 0.01 Energy Usage3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mobile Sources4 14.40 13.10 116.00 0.30 27.60 7.17 Total Emissions 35.40 13.33 139.80 0.30 27.61 7.18 SCAQMD Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Notes: 1 Source: CalEEMod Version 2022.1.1.22 Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. Energy usage consists of emissions from on-site natural gas usage. As shown on Table 9, the Proposed Project does not exceed the SCAQMD daily emission threshold. Therefore, regional operational emissions would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. Operational Localized Significance Thresholds Table 10: Localized Significance – Unmitigated Operational Emissions, shows the calculated emissions for the proposed operational activities compared with appropriate LSTs. The LST analysis only includes on-site sources; however, the CalEEMod software outputs do not separate on-site and off-site emissions for mobile sources. For a worst-case scenario assessment, the emissions shown in Table 10 include all on-site Project-related stationary sources and 10 percent of the Project-related new mobile sources. This percentage is an estimate of the amount of Project- related new vehicle traffic that will occur on-site. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 232 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Table 10: Localized Significance – Unmitigated Operational Emissions 1 Area Sources2 0.23 23.80 0.01 0.01 Energy Usage3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 On-Site Vehicle Emissions4 0.44 3.87 0.92 0.24 Total Emissions 0.67 27.67 0.93 0.25 SCAQMD Threshold for 25 meters (82 feet) or less2 371 1,965 4 2 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Notes: 1 Source: Calculated from CalEEMod and SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Look-up Tables for 5 acres in Hemet/San Jacinto Valley Source Receptor Area (SRA 28). Project will be approximately 76.3 acres. Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. Energy usage consists of emissions from generation of electricity and on-site natural gas usage. On-site vehicular emissions based on 1/10 of the gross vehicular emissions and road dust. Table 10 indicates that the local operational emissions would not exceed the LST thresholds at the nearest sensitive receptors, located adjacent to the Project, the currently Proposed Project would not result in significant Localized Operational emissions. No mitigation is required. Cumulative Regional Air Quality Impacts Cumulative projects include local development as well as general growth within the project area. However, as with most development, the greatest source of emissions is from mobile sources, which travel well out of the local area. Therefore, from an air quality standpoint, the cumulative analysis would extend beyond any local projects and when wind patterns are considered, would cover an even larger area. Accordingly, the cumulative analysis for the Project’s air quality must be generic by nature. The Project area is out of attainment for both ozone and PM10 particulate matter. Construction and operation of cumulative projects will further degrade the local air quality, as well as the air quality of the South Coast Air Basin. The greatest cumulative impact on the quality of regional air cell will be the incremental addition of pollutants mainly from increased traffic from residential, commercial, and industrial development and the use of heavy equipment and trucks associated with the construction of these projects. Air quality will be temporarily degraded during construction activities that occur separately or simultaneously. However, in accordance with the SCAQMD methodology, projects that do not exceed the SCAQMD criteria or can be mitigated to less than criteria levels are not significant and do not add to the overall cumulative impact. The Project would not exceed any of the thresholds of significance and therefore is considered less than significant. c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant Impact. A significant impact may occur when a project would generate pollutant concentrations to a degree that would significantly affect sensitive receptors, which include populations that are more susceptible to the effects of air pollution than the population at large. Exposure of sensitive receptors is addressed for the following situations: CO hotspots; criteria pollutants and toxic air contaminants (TACs, specifically diesel particulate matter [DPM]) from on-site construction; exposure to off-site TAC emissions; and asbestos and lead-based paint during demolition. Operational, long-term TACs may be generated by some industrial land uses; commercial land uses 5.1.i Packet Pg. 233 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 e.g., gas stations and dry cleaners); and diesel trucks on freeways. Residential land uses do not generate substantial quantities of TACs and are therefore not addressed in this section of this document. Carbon Monoxide Hotspot Emissions CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential local air quality impacts. Local air quality impacts can be assessed by comparing future without and with project CO levels to the State and Federal CO standards which were presented above. To determine if the proposed Project could cause emission levels in excess of the CO standards discussed above, a sensitivity analysis is typically conducted to determine the potential for CO “hot spots” at a number of intersections in the general project vicinity. Because of reduced speeds and vehicle queuing, “hot spots” potentially can occur at high traffic volume intersections with a Level of Service E or worse. Micro-scale air quality emissions have traditionally been analyzed in environmental documents where the air basin was a non-attainment area for CO. However, the SCAQMD has demonstrated in the CO attainment redesignation request to EPA that there are no “hot spots” anywhere in the air basin, even at intersections with much higher volumes, much worse congestion, and much higher background CO levels than anywhere in Riverside County. If the worst-case intersections in the air basin have no “hot spot” potential, any local impacts will be below thresholds. The traffic analysis (Appendix H) showed that the Project would generate 3,952 trips per day. The 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide (1992 CO Plan) showed that an intersection which has a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day would not violate the CO standard. The volume of traffic at Project buildout would be well below 100,000 vehicles and below the necessary volume to even get close to causing a violation of the CO standard. Therefore, no CO “hot spot” modeling was performed, and no significant long-term air quality impact is anticipated to local air quality with the on-going use of the Proposed Project. Exposure to On-Site Construction Toxic Air Contaminant Emissions The greatest potential for toxic air contaminant emissions would be related to diesel particulate emissions associated with heavy equipment operations during construction of the Proposed Project. The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has issued the Air Toxic Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines and Guidance Manual for the Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, February 2015 to provide a description of the algorithms, recommended exposure variates, cancer and noncancer health values, and the air modeling protocols needed to perform a HRA under the Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act of 1987. Hazard identification includes identifying all substances that are evaluated for cancer risk and/or non-cancer acute, 8-hour, and chronic health impacts. In addition, identifying any multi-pathway substances that present a cancer risk or chronic non- cancer hazard via non-inhalation routes of exposure. An HRA was prepared for the Proposed Project (Appendix A-2). According to the HRA, construction activities would result in short-term Project-generated emissions of DPM from the exhaust of off-road, heavy-duty diesel equipment used for site preparation (e.g., demolition, excavation, and grading); paving; building construction; and other miscellaneous activities. CARB identified DPM as a TAC in 1998. The dose to which receptors are exposed is the primary factor used to determine health risk. Dose is a function of the concentration of a substance or substances in the environment and the duration of 5.1.i Packet Pg. 234 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 exposure to the substance. Thus, the risks estimated for a maximally exposed individual are higher if a fixed exposure occurs over a longer time period. According to the OEHHA, HRAs—which determine the exposure of sensitive receptors to TAC emissions—should be based on a 30-year exposure period; however, such assessments should be limited to the period/duration of activities associated with the Project (Appendix A-2). The Project would result in the development of residential uses which do not involve substantial levels of TACs due to the nature of the development. However, construction activities will result in emissions of DPM which is carcinogenic. The HRA report in Appendix A-2 estimated the cancer risk to construction for 10 receptor locations near the Project Site (Table 3, Appendix A-2). The report identifies that the cancer risks from construction activities are estimated to range from a low of 0.21 per million at West Esplanade Ave to a high of 0.86 per million along West Seventh Street. All estimates are below the SCAQMD’s significance threshold of 10 in a million. As such, Project-related construction emissions of TACs would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial emissions of TACs (Appendix A-2). The impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Exposure to Off-Site Construction Toxic Air Contaminant Emissions As stated in the HRA, the CARB Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective provides guidance concerning land use compatibility with TAC sources (CARB 2005). While not a law or adopted policy, the handbook offers advisory recommendations for siting sensitive receptors near uses associated with TACs (such as freeways and high-traffic roads, commercial distribution centers, rail yards, ports, refineries, dry cleaners, gasoline stations, and industrial facilities) to help keep children and other sensitive populations out of harm’s way. (Appendix A-2). Projects of concern for mobile sources of TACs are typically those located within 500 feet of the following types of facilities that emit significant quantities of DPM: urban roads with more than 100,000 vehicles per day; freeways or roads with a high heavy truck concentration; and/or near rail yards, ports, and/or distribution centers. The Proposed Project Site is more than 500 feet from any freeway or major urban road. With respect to proximity to emissions from railroad sources, CARB recommends avoiding siting new sensitive land uses within 1,000 feet of a major service and maintenance rail yard (CARB 2005); the Proposed Project Site is not located within 1,000 feet of this type of facility. CARB recommends not placing sensitive receptors within the same building as a dry cleaner and avoiding siting residences within 300 feet of a large gas station or within 500 feet of dry-cleaning operations with 2 machines using perchloroethylene. There are no gas stations within 300 feet or dry cleaners within 500 feet of the Proposed Project Site. As such, the health risks associated with locating sensitive receptors proximate to a dry cleaner would be less than significant since there are no dry cleaners located within 500 feet of the site. It is important to note the CARB recommendation was published in 2005; however, subsequent to CARB’s recommendation in 2007, the CARB established a phase-out of perchloroethylene usage at dry cleaners by 2023. The HRA for the Project has also provided the relative health risk of the Project area as well as other locations in the general area and the air basin. The overall cancer risk at the Proposed Project Site of 254 per million health risk is generally lower than other areas identified within the HRA and substantially less than the basin-wide average of 455 in a million health risk. As such, no off-site sensitive uses would be exposed to significant levels TACs. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required (Appendix A-2). 5.1.i Packet Pg. 235 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Less Than Significant Impact. The SCAQMD recommends that odor impacts be addressed in a qualitative manner. Such an analysis shall determine whether the Project would result in excessive nuisance odors, as defined under the California Code of Regulations and Section 41700 of the California Health and Safety Code, and thus would constitute a public nuisance related to air quality. Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include the application of materials such as asphalt pavement. The objectionable odors that may be produced during the construction process are short-term in nature and the odor emissions are expected to cease upon the drying or hardening of the odor producing materials. Diesel exhaust and VOCs would be emitted during construction of the Project, which are objectionable to some; however, emissions would disperse rapidly from the Proposed Project Site and therefore should not reach an objectionable level at the nearest sensitive receptors. Due to the short-term nature and limited amounts of odor producing materials being utilized, no significant impact related to odors would occur during construction of the Proposed Project. Potential sources that may emit odors during the on-going operations of the proposed Project would include odor emissions from trash storage areas and vehicle emissions. Due to the distance of the nearest receptors from the Proposed Project Site and through compliance with SCAQMD’s Rule 402, no significant impact related to odors would occur during the on-going operations of the proposed Project and no mitigation is required. 4.3.3 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Air Quality apply to the Proposed Project. 4.3.4 Conclusion There are less than significant potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Air Quality, and no mitigation would be required. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 236 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 4.4 Biological Resources Information and analysis in this section is derived from the documents incorporated by reference as identified in Section 1.3 of this document and biological surveys completed to determine potential impacts to biological services associated with the development of the Proposed Project, included as Appendix B-1 – Habitat Assessment for Chacon Farms Property, Psomas, March 5, 2024, and Appendix B-2 – Tree Inventory Report for the Chacon Farms Property, City of San Jacinto, California, Psomas, April 28, 2023. 4.4.1 Regulatory Setting Given the local environment, regulations governing biological resources for this Project include the following: Migratory Bird Treaty Act The federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918 (16 U.S.C 703-711) provides protection for nesting birds that are both residents and migrants whether they are considered sensitive by resource agencies. The MBTA makes it unlawful to take, possess, buy, sell, purchase, or barter any migratory bird listed under 50 CFR 10, including feathers or other parts, nests, eggs, or products, except as allowed by implementing regulations (50 CFR 21). The direct injury or death of a migratory bird, due to construction activities or other construction- related disturbance that causes nest abandonment, nestling abandonment, or forced fledging would be considered a take under federal law. The USFWS, in coordination with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) administers the MBTA. CDFW’s authoritative nexus to MBTA is provided in California Fish and Game Code (FGC) Sections 3503.5 which protects all birds of prey and their nests and FGC Section 3800 which protects all non-game birds that occur naturally in the State. Endangered Species Act - Federal The purpose of the United States Endangered Species Act that was established in 1973 provides protections for fish, wildlife, and plants that are listed as threatened or endangered; provides for adding species to and removing them from the list of threatened and endangered species, and for preparing and implementing plans for their recovery; provides for interagency cooperation to avoid take of listed species and for issuing permits for otherwise prohibited activities; provides for cooperation with States, including authorization of financial assistance; and implements the provisions of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna. The US Fish and Wildlife administers the federal Endangered Species Act. California Endangered Species Act The California Endangered Species Act (CESA) is a California environmental law that conserves and protects plant and animal species at risk of extinction. Originally enacted in 1970, CESA was repealed and replaced by an updated version in 1984 and amended in 1997. Plant and animal species may be designated threatened or endangered under CESA after a formal listing process by the California Fish and Game Commission. Approximately 250 species are currently listed under CESA. A CESA-listed species, or any part or product of the plant or animal, may not be imported into the state, exported out of the state, “taken” (i.e., killed), possessed, purchased, or sold without proper authorization. Implementation of CESA has reduced and avoided impacts to California’s most imperiled plants and animals, has protected hundreds of thousands of acres of vital habitat, and has led to a greater scientific understanding of California’s incredible biodiversity. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) works with agencies, organizations, and other interested persons to study, protect, and preserve CESA-listed species and their habitats. CDFW also conducts scientific reviews of species petitioned for listing under CESA, administers regulatory permitting programs to authorize take of listed species, maintains an extensive database of listed species occurrences, and conducts periodic reviews of listed species to determine if the conditions that led to original listing are still present. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 237 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 4.4.2 Environmental Setting The Proposed Project Site consists of agricultural areas with developed and disturbed areas around the edges. Existing vegetation observed on the Proposed Project Site include field croplands and valley and foothill grassland; disturbed and developed landcovers are also present, as shown in Appendix B-1 (refer to Exhibit 4, Vegetation Types and Other Areas). Additionally, there is a detention basin located in the northwest corner of the Proposed Project Site. The detention basin undergoes routine maintenance and appears to have been plowed multiple times in the past based on historical aerials. The main source of water for this basin is irrigation from the adjacent agricultural fields; no natural inlet or outlet was observed in the field. It does not connect to a natural drainage, and no riparian vegetation is present. 4.4.3 Impact Analysis Impact Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fis X habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, X federally protected wetlands (including, but not direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or X corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife X protecting biological resources, such as a tree X Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state X 5.1.i Packet Pg. 238 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Discussion a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modification, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. No candidate, sensitive, or special status species are expected to occur on the Proposed Project Site due to lack of suitable habitat and/or because they were absent during focused surveys. The Proposed Project Site is not located within any designated critical habitat for federally or State-listed Threatened or Endangered species. According to the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Information Mapping Application (2023), the Proposed Project Site was required to be assessed for Narrow Endemic plant species, burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), Riparian/Riverine habitat (i.e., riparian bird species), and vernal pool branchiopods (i.e., fairy shrimp). Narrow Endemic Plants Per Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP, habitat was assessed for the following Narrow Endemic plant species: Munz’s onion (Allium munzii), San Diego ambrosia (Ambrosia pumila), many-stemmed dudleya Dudleya multicaulis), spreading navarretia (Navarretia fossalis), Californica Orcutt grass (Orcuttia californica), and Wright’s trichocoronis (Trichocoronis wrightii). Of these Narrow Endemic plant species, San Diego ambrosia, spreading navarretia, California Orcutt grass, and Wright’s trichocoronis had limited potential to occur based on the presence of marginally suitable habitat (i.e., the on-site basin and/or margins of the agricultural field). Munz’s onion and many- stemmed dudleya would not be expected to occur based on lack of suitable habitat. Additionally, the Proposed Project Site was determined to have potential for Salt Spring checkerbloom (Sidalcea neomexicana), which is a California Rare Plant Rank [CRPR] 2B.22 species and is not covered by the MSHCP. Focused surveys were conducted for Narrow Endemic and other special status plant species; no Narrow Endemic or special status plant species were observed. Therefore, there would be no impact on these species, and no mitigation would be required. Burrowing Owl On October 10, 2024, the California Fish and Game Commission (CFGC) accepted the petition to designate the western burrowing owl as a candidate species for protection under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). The species will have full CESA protections until the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) decides whether listing is warranted, which will likely occur in late 2025 or early 2026. The MSHCP identifies the burrowing owl as a covered species and requires surveys to determine habitat and presence prior to approving projects. The City of San Jacinto is signatory to the MSHCP. Per Section 6.3.2 of the MSHCP, the Proposed Project Site was assessed for the presence of burrowing owl habitat. The habitat assessment determined that suitable habitat for the burrowing owl was present on the Proposed Project Site and adjacent areas (e.g., field croplands and disturbed areas); therefore, focused surveys were required. Potentially suitable burrows were observed; however, no burrowing owls, or other evidence of owl presence (e.g., cast pellets, white-wash, feathers, or prey CRPR 2B.2: Plants rare, threatened, or endangered in California but common elsewhere; 20–80 percent of occurrences threatened. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 239 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 remains) were observed during the focused surveys. Therefore, there would be no impact on this species, and no compensatory mitigation would be required. Because site conditions change over time and burrowing owls move seasonally, a burrowing owl could be on the Proposed Project Site in the future. All projects located within the Additional Survey Area for burrowing owl are required to conduct a pre-construction survey for burrowing owl within 30 days prior to construction to ensure the Project would not impact any active burrows. Therefore, the Project would implement Mitigation Measure BIO-1, which would require a pre-construction survey for burrowing owls. Riparian Bird Species Per Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP, the Proposed Project Site must be assessed for the presence of Riparian/Riverine habitat; no Riparian/Riverine habitat was present on the Proposed Project Site. Therefore, there would be no impact on riparian bird species covered by this section of the MSHCP, and no mitigation would be required. Vernal Pool Branchiopods (Fairy Shrimp) Per Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP, the Proposed Project Site must be assessed for the presence of vernal pools and associated vernal pool branchiopods. The detention basin at the northwest corner of the Proposed Project Site was observed to support ponding; the source of the water appears to be irrigation from the adjacent agricultural fields. Historic aerials were examined on Google Earth between 1996 to 2021 to examine the extent of ponding over time. The artificial basin appears to have been intermittently ponded beginning in 2009. During dry periods, the area appears to have been plowed and blends in with the surrounding agricultural field. As stated in the MSHCP, stock ponds, ephemeral pools, and other features that are artificially created are not considered vernal pools meeting the requirements of Section 6.1.2 (refer to Fair Shrimp Report in Appendix B-1). However, they may still provide habitat for vernal pool invertebrate species that are protected by the MSHCP. One wet season focused survey and one dry season focused survey were conducted for Riverside fairy shrimp (Streptocephalus woottoni) and vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi) in 2022–2023; neither of these species was observed during the wet season fairy shrimp surveys. Dry season sampling was conducted in August 2023; Branchinecta cysts were observed but the lab results were inconclusive. Of the cysts observed, only one cyst hatched; it was identified as versatile fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lindali), a common species of fairy shrimp. The Brancinecta cysts collected during dry season sampling were then sent to Washington State University for a genetic analysis; results of the genetic analysis confirmed the genetic material was from versatile fairy shrimp (i.e., the common species). No Riverside fairy shrimp or vernal pool fairy shrimp were observed during focused surveys; therefore, there would be no impact on these species. Crotch’s Bumble Bee Crotch’s bumble bee (Bombus crotchii) was proposed as a Candidate to be State listed as Endangered in 2019; this species is not a Covered Species in the MSHCP. Crotch bumble bee is a ground nester and often makes its nest in abandoned mammal burrows; it can be found in most native habitat types, although it prefers grassland and scrub habitats. The Proposed Project Site has been utilized as an agricultural area that lacks vegetation, and the Proposed Project Site has been regularly tilled detrimental to ground-nesting bees) and may have been exposed to pesticides. While the edges of the agricultural fields may be considered marginally suitable, this species is not expected to occur because the surrounding land uses are agricultural or residential; there are no adjacent areas of grassland or scrub habitats. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 240 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Mountain Lion The mountain lion (Puma concolor) is currently a Candidate to be State listed as Threatened as an Evolutionary Significant Unit (ESU). Regardless of the outcome of the proposed listing, this species is already a MSHCP Covered Species. The mountain lion occurs throughout most of California except for the Mojave and Colorado Deserts and the croplands of the Central Valley. Mountain lions occur in a variety of habitats, especially brushy habitats and riparian areas with interspersed irregular terrain, rocky outcrops, and tree/brush edges. Mountain lions use caves, natural cavities, and thickets for cover. A major threat to this species is fragmentation of habitat by spread of human developments and associated roads. Mountain lion is not expected to occur on the Proposed Project Site due to lack of suitable habitat. Additionally, the Proposed Project Site is also not within an area designated as a MSHCP linkage for wildlife movement. Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat In response to the listing of Stephens’ kangaroo rat (Dipodomys stephensi), the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency developed a Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan (SKR HCP). The City of San Jacinto is not a participant in the SKR HCP; however, the MSHCP provides take authorization for projects outside the SKR HCP but within the MSHCP boundaries. Stephens’ kangaroo rat is not expected to occur on the Proposed Project Site due to lack of suitable habitat. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. There is no riparian habitat or sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service present on the Project Site (Appendix B-1). There would be no impact, and no mitigation is required. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including but not limited to marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. There are no jurisdictional features on the Proposed Project Site. The detention basin present in the northwest corner of the Proposed Project Site was artificially created in uplands that were previously used for croplands. This area is irrigated, as evidenced by rills in the banks adjacent to the active agricultural field. This type of waterbody is excluded from being classified as a Waters of the U.S. under the jurisdiction of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) because it is isolated. Artificial wetlands less than one acre in size are not considered Waters of the State under the authority of the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Based on historic aerial imagery and topographic maps, this area does not appear to have been part of a historic drainage; therefore, it would not be under the regulatory authority of the CDFW. As such, no drainages or other waters that would be under the jurisdiction of the USACE, RWQCB, or CDFW occur on the Proposed Project Site. As mentioned above, the detention basin at the northwest corner of the Proposed Project Site was observed to support ponding; the source of the water appears to be irrigation from the adjacent agricultural fields. Historic aerials were examined on Google Earth between 1996 to 2021 to examine the extent of ponding over time. The detention basin appears to have been intermittently ponded beginning in 2009. During dry periods, the area appears to have been plowed and blends in with the surrounding agricultural field. As stated in the MSHCP, stock ponds, ephemeral pools, and other features that are artificially created are not considered vernal pools meeting the requirements of 5.1.i Packet Pg. 241 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Section 6.1.2 (Appendix B-1). Therefore, no impact would occur related to wetlands, and no mitigation would be required. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The Proposed Project Site is surrounded by existing development, with suburban development to the north and east, a dairy farm to the south, and construction an additional residential development to the west. Additionally, the Proposed Project Site is not located within a “Core” or “Linkage” area designated by the MSHCP. Wildlife could move locally through the Proposed Project Site and adjacent residential, agricultural, and dairy land. The Proposed Project Site is expected to be used for local movement by urban-tolerant species such as coyote (Canis latrans), which could also use the Proposed Project Site after Project implementation. Therefore, there would be no impact on wildlife movement. Birds have potential to nest throughout the Proposed Project Site in vegetation, on bare ground, and on structures. The MBTA protects the taking of migratory birds and their nests and eggs. Bird species protected under the provisions of the MBTA are identified by the List of Migratory Birds (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 50, Section 10.13). Section 3503 of the California Fish and Game Code makes it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any bird’s nest or any bird’s eggs. Section 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code prohibits the take and possession of any migratory nongame bird, as designated in the MBTA. Any impact on an active bird nest would be considered a violation of the MBTA. Section 7.5.3 of the MSHCP requires implementation of Construction Minimization Measures, which include conducting vegetation clearing outside the peak nesting season (i.e., March 1 to June 30) to the extent practicable in order to avoid impacts on nesting birds. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-2 would require a pre-construction nesting bird/raptor survey and protection for any nests observed. Existing trees located in the northeastern corner of the Proposed Project Site and adjacent to the Proposed Project Site also have potential to be used for nesting by raptors. Trees within the Proposed Project Site include Peruvian pepper tree (Schinus mole), Mexican fan palm (Washingtonia robusta), and California fan palm (Washingtonia filifera) (refer to Appendix B-2). If construction occurs during the raptor nesting season (i.e., February 1 to June 30), the loss of an active nest of any raptor species, including common raptor species, would be considered a violation of Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code. As discussed above, Section 7.5.3 of the MSHCP requires implementation of Construction Minimization Measures, which include conducting vegetation clearing outside the peak nesting season to the extent practicable in order to avoid impacts on nesting birds including raptors); however, raptors nest slightly earlier than other nesting birds (i.e., February 1 to June 30). Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-2 would require a pre-construction nesting bird/raptor survey and protection for any nests observed. Therefore, impacts related to migratory corridors or native nursery sites would be less than significant with mitigation measures incorporated. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Less Than Significant. The City of San Jacinto Municipal Code prohibits removal of trees from public streets or parkways, and authorization must be obtained from the City Council (Section 12.20). There is no restriction on the removal of trees located on private property; however, tentative tract maps must show the location of all trees having a diameter of 9.5 inches or greater. A total of 22 trees occur on the Proposed Project Site, as shown in the Tree Inventory Report (Appendix B-2) including one tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima), one lemon tree (Citrus limon), two Mondell pine (Pinus eldarica), one peach tree (Prunus persica), four Peruvian pepper trees, four California fan palms, and nine Mexican 5.1.i Packet Pg. 242 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 fan palms. Removal of these trees does not conflict with the tree ordinance; they have been incorporated into Project plans. Therefore, there would be no impact, and no mitigation would be required. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The Proposed Project Site is located in the MSHCP area, specifically, within the San Jacinto Valley Area Plan. The City of San Jacinto is a signatory to the MSHCP; therefore, the Project would be subject to the provisions of the MSHCP. The Proposed Project Site is not located within an MSHCP Criteria Cell; the nearest Criteria Cell is approximately 0.25 miles southwest of the Proposed Project Site. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with assembly of the MSHCP Reserve. Habitat assessments and focused surveys were conducted in accordance with MSHCP requirements. Focused surveys were negative for all the species that required additional surveys. As required by the MSHCP, a pre-construction survey for burrowing owl will be conducted (Mitigation Measure BIO-1). Also as required by the MSHCP, a per-acre mitigation fee will be required by the City of San Jacinto based on unit density (i.e., 5.5 dwelling units per acre), Mitigation Measure BIO-3. Lastly, the Project must be constructed following the standard MSHCP Construction Minimization Measures (MSHCP Section 7.5.3), Mitigation Measure BIO-4. With implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1, BIO-3, and BIO-4, the Project would not conflict with the MSHCP. The City of San Jacinto is not a participant in the SKR HCP; however, the MSHCP provides take authorization for projects outside the SKR HCP but within the MSHCP boundaries. The Project does not occur within a SKR HCP Reserve area; therefore, the Project does not conflict with the SKR HCP. As such, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. 4.4.4 Mitigation Measures BIO-1 The Project Applicant shall retain a qualified Biologist to conduct a pre-construction survey for burrowing owl on the Proposed Project Site (and including adjacent areas within 500 feet to the extent possible) within 30 days prior to construction. Methods for the pre- construction surveys shall be conducted as a one-day focused survey following the Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP 2006). Following the survey, the Biologist shall prepare a Memorandum/Letter Report describing the methods and results of the survey for submittal to the City. If burrowing owl are observed, the Report shall also make recommendations for avoidance and minimization measures depending on the timing of construction and the location of the active burrow with respect to planned activities. If burrowing owl are observed, the Project Applicant (or their designee) shall contact the City to discuss avoidance and minimization options. During the breeding season (i.e., March 1 to August 31), restrictions shall be placed on construction activities in the vicinity of any active burrow until the burrow is no longer active, as determined by a qualified Biologist. The protective buffer shall be 500 feet (or as otherwise approved by the City) around the active burrow. The protective buffer shall be flagged clearly in the field, mapped as an Environmentally Sensitive Area,” and the maps provided to the Project Applicant, their designee (e.g., Construction Supervisor), and the City. During the wintering season, an active burrow may be closed following CDFW-approved procedures with permission from the City. If the wintering burrow would not be directly impacted, a protective buffer of 160 feet (or as otherwise approved by the City) shall be placed around the burrow. The 5.1.i Packet Pg. 243 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 protective buffer shall be flagged clearly in the field, mapped as an “Environmentally Sensitive Area,” and the maps provided to the Project Applicant, their designee (e.g., Construction Supervisor), and the City. The Project Applicant shall not proceed with construction until the avoidance and minimization measures have been approved by the City and all appropriate protections are in place. BIO-2 To the extent possible, vegetation removal will be conducted during the non-breeding season (September 12 to January 31)3 in order to minimize direct impacts on nesting birds and raptors. If construction activities would be initiated during the peak breeding season for nesting birds/raptors (February 1–June 30), a pre-construction survey will be conducted by a qualified Biologist within three days prior to the initiation of construction (including demolition of structures). The nesting bird/raptor survey area will include a buffer of 100 feet around the work area for nesting birds and a buffer of 500 feet around the work area for nesting raptors. This survey can be combined with the pre-construction burrowing owl survey described in MM BIO-1. If the Biologist does not find any active nests in or immediately adjacent to the impact area, construction activities can proceed. If the Biologist detects an active nest within or immediately adjacent to the construction area and determines that the nest may be impacted, or breeding activities substantially disrupted by increased activity around the nest, the Biologist will determine an appropriate protective buffer around the nest depending on the sensitivity of the species and the nature of the construction activity. The protective buffer shall be between 25 to 100 feet for nesting birds and 300 to 500 feet for nesting raptors. No work will be allowed within the protective buffer until nesting activity has ended, as determined by a qualified Biologist. Any protective buffers will be flagged clearly in the field, mapped as “Environmentally Sensitive Areas,” and the maps provided to the Project Applicant, their designee (e.g., Construction Supervisor), and the City. Construction can proceed within the protective buffer when the qualified Biologist has determined that the nest is no longer active (i.e., fledglings have left the nest, or the nest has failed). BIO-3 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall pay the MSHCP mitigation fee as directed by the City of San Jacinto based on the most current rates. BIO-4 The Project Applicant and their designee (i.e., Construction Contractors) shall follow required MSHCP Construction Minimization Measures (Section 7.5.3 of the MSHCP). Applicable construction minimization measures are listed below. x Plans for water pollution and erosion control will be prepared for all Discretionary Projects involving the movement of earth in excess of 50 cubic yards. The plans will describe sediment and hazardous materials control, dewatering or diversion structures, fueling and equipment management practices, use of plant material for erosion control. Plans will be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction. x Timing of construction activities will consider seasonal requirements for breeding birds and migratory non-resident species. Habitat clearing will be avoided during species active breeding season defined as March 1 to June 30. x Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented until such time soils are determined to be successfully stabilized. 3 These dates are outside the collective dates for the raptor nesting season (February 1 to June 30, peak nesting bird season (March 1 to June 3), and burrowing owl breeding season (March 1 to August 31). 5.1.i Packet Pg. 244 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 x Silt fencing or other sediment trapping materials will be installed at the downstream end of construction activities to minimize the transport of sediments off-site. x The limits of disturbance, including the upstream, downstream, and lateral extents, will be clearly defined and marked in the field. Monitoring personnel will review the limits of disturbance prior to initiation of construction activities. x Exotic species removed during construction will be properly handled to prevent sprouting or regrowth. x Training of construction personnel will be provided. x Ongoing monitoring and reporting will occur for the duration of the construction activity to ensure implementation of best management practices. x When work is conducted during the fire season (as identified by the Riverside County Fire Department) adjacent to coastal sage scrub or chaparral vegetation, appropriate fire-fighting equipment (e.g., extinguishers, shovels, water tankers) shall be available on the site during all phases of project construction to help minimize the chance of human- caused wildfires. Shields, protective mats, and/or other fire preventative methods shall be used during grinding, welding, and other spark-inducing activities. Personnel trained in fire hazards, preventative actions, and responses to fires shall advise contractors regarding fire risk from all construction-related activities. x Active construction areas shall be watered regularly to control dust and minimize impacts to adjacent vegetation. x All equipment maintenance, staging, and dispensing of fuel, oil, coolant, or any other toxic substances shall occur only in designated areas within the proposed grading limits of the Proposed Project Site. These designated areas shall be clearly marked and located in such a manner as to contain run-off. x Waste, dirt, rubble, or trash shall not be deposited in the Conservation Area or on native habitat. 4.4.5 Conclusion Implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1, BIO-2, BIO-3, and BIO-4 would reduce potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Biological Resources to less than significant. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 245 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 4.5 Cultural Resources Information and analysis in this section is derived from the documents incorporated by reference as identified in Section 1.3 of this document and the Phase I Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Inventory, prepared by Psomas, dated October 2023, and included as Appendix C, which includes an Eastern Information Center (EIC) cultural resources literature and records search, a Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands Files (SLF) database search, Western Science Center (WSC) Paleontological Record Search, and pedestrian field survey. A Historic Built Environment Assessment, prepared by South Environmental, is included in Appendix C. 4.5.1 Environmental Setting The study in Appendix C included a records search through the EIC, intensive-level pedestrian field survey and paleontological resources overview. The EIC record search identified 14 prior cultural resources studies within 0.8 km (one-half mile) of the Proposed Project Site were completed between 1990 and 2014 and are identified on Table 11: Prior Cultural Studies Within ½-mile of the Project Site. Two of the cultural resource studies (RI-06821 and RI-08160) traversed the Proposed Project Site. The 14 studies consisted of archaeological field studies and literature reviews (Appendix C). Table 11: Prior Cultural Studies Within ½-mile of the Project Site RI-02885 1990 Arkush, Brooke Cultural Resources Sites for the Perris Water Williams Communications, Inc., Optic Cable System Installation Sheila for 40-Acre Parcel, San 5.1.i Packet Pg. 246 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Report No. Year Author(s) Type of Study Title of Study Proximity to Proposed Project Site West Esplanade Project 431-190-010 & APN 431-190- Use Project, City of San Jacinto, J. Source: Appendix C Previously Recorded Cultural Resources The EIC records searches also identified five previously recorded cultural resources within 0.8 km (1/2-mile) of the Proposed Project Site and are identified on Table 12: Previously Recorded Cultural Resources Within Mile of the Project Site (Appendix C). The previously recorded resources include historic buildings and structures. No precontact cultural resources (before the arrival of Europeans) were identified by the EIC. None of the five historic buildings and structures are located within the Proposed Project Site. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 247 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Table 12: Previously Recorded Cultural Resources Within ½ Mile of the Project Site P-33-006287 – Historic: building, structure 1982 (Warner, Jim); 2007 (Tibbet, Casey) Outside P-33-007301 – Historic: building 1982 (Swift, Laura), 2006 (McElroy, Sheila) Outside P-33-014791 – Historic: building, structure 2003 (Livingstone, D.) Outside P-33-015267 – Historic: building 2006 (McElroy, Sheila) Outside P-33-017928 – Historic: structure 2010 (Dice, Michael) Outside Source: Appendix C Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File Search On September 19, 2022, Psomas requested that the NAHC conduct a search of its SLF database to determine if cultural resources important to Native Americans have been recorded in the Proposed Project Site or in the immediate vicinity. The results of the NAHC SLF search were received on November 22, 2022, and were negative; however, it should be noted that the records maintained by the NAHC, and the CHRIS are not exhaustive and a negative response to these searches does not preclude the existence of a tribal cultural resource. Furthermore, a tribe may be the only source of information regarding the existence of a tribal cultural resource. The review included a list of tribes affiliated with the Proposed Project Site. If these tribal governments have requested to be listed on the City’s Assembly Bill (AB) 52 contact list the tribal governments will be contacted by the City and offered an opportunity to consult on the Project to comply with the requirements of AB 52. The SLF search results summary letter from the NAHC is provided in the Phase I Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Inventory (Appendix C). Field Survey Psomas cultural resource specialist Heather Garnett, RPA, surveyed the Proposed Project Site on February 9, 2023. The cultural resources field survey did not identify archaeological resources; however, it should be noted ground visibility was obscured by dense vegetation and recent flooding from rain. Additionally, the structures located on at the northern end of the Proposed Project Site date to 1940s. A separate historic built environment assessment of the structures and report has been prepared by South Environmental, included in the Phase I Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Inventory (Appendix C). 4.5.2 Impact Analysis Impact Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in 15064.5? X b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to 15064.5? X c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X 5.1.i Packet Pg. 248 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Discussion a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? Less Than Significant Impact. Public Resources Code Section 15064.5(a) defines historical resources, which includes: A resource listed in, or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission, for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (Pub. Res. Code Section 5024.1, Title 14 CCR, Section 14 CCR, Section 4850 et seq.). The EIC record search results identified five cultural resources located within a half-mile of the Proposed Project Site. These resources consist of five historic-era buildings and associated structures that establish historic-era land use within the generalized area. None of the five cultural resources are within the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the proposed Project will not impact these cultural resources. One built environment resource over 45 years old was identified within the Proposed Project Site: a residential farm located at 710 Cawston Avenue North comprising several buildings and structures. The Proposed Project Site was recorded and evaluated for historical significance on the appropriate set of DPR Forms in consideration of CRHR and City designation criteria and integrity requirements. The Proposed Project Site was found not eligible under all State and local designation criteria due to a lack of significant historical associations, a lack of architectural merit, and compromised integrity. No historical resources were identified within the Proposed Project Site as a result of this analysis. Therefore, with respect to a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5, the proposed Project would not impact a historical resource under CEQA. No mitigation is required. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. A significant impact would occur if grading or excavation activities associated with the Project were to disturb archaeological resources that presently exist within the Proposed Project Site. The EIC record search results identified five cultural resources located within one-half-mile of the Proposed Project Site. These resources consist of five historic-era buildings and associated structures that establish historic-era land use within the generalized area. None of the five cultural resources are archaeological resources. However, there is the possibility that undiscovered intact archaeological resources may be present below the surface in native (alluvial) sediments. These potential effects would be mitigated to a less than significant level with the implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1, which recommends archaeological monitoring when excavations are required in native sediment. c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. A significant adverse effect could occur if grading or excavation activities associated with the Project were to disturb previously interred human remains. The Proposed Project Site is located within a developed area that has been subject to earth- moving activities in the past, and no known burial sites are located on or adjacent to the Proposed Project Site. In the unlikely event of an unanticipated discovery of human remains in the Proposed Project Site during construction, the California Health and Safety Code and the California Public Resources Code require that any activity in the area of a potential find be halted and the Orange County Coroner be notified, as described in Mitigation Measure CUL-2. Implementation of CUL-2 would ensure impacts related to this threshold are less than significant, and no mitigation is required 5.1.i Packet Pg. 249 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 4.5.3 Mitigation Measures CUL-1 The Project proponent shall retain a Project Archaeologist prior to the initiation of ground- disturbing activities to monitor ground-disturbing activities occurring within native sediment (in situ material). In the event that archaeological resources are discovered at the Proposed Project Site, the handling of the discovered resources shall occur, as described below. All artifacts discovered shall be inventoried and analyzed by the Project Archaeologist. If any artifacts of Native American origin are discovered, all activities in the immediate vicinity of the find within a 50-foot radius) shall stop, and the Project Archaeologist shall notify the property owner and tribes identified by the NAHC as being affiliated with the area. The Project Archaeologist and Tribal Representative will analyze the Native American artifacts for identification as everyday life and/or religious or sacred items, cultural affiliation, temporal placement, and function, as deemed possible. The significance of Native American resources shall be evaluated in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and shall consider the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the affiliated tribes. All items found in association with Native American human remains shall be considered grave goods or sacred in origin and subject to special handling. Non-Native American artifacts shall be inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership), function, and temporal placement. After analysis and reporting, these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the property owner, as deemed appropriate. Once grading activities have ceased or the Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the lead agency and Tribal Representative, determines that monitoring is no longer necessary, monitoring activities can be discontinued. A report of findings, including an itemized inventory of recovered artifacts, shall be prepared upon completion of the steps outlined above. A copy of the report shall also be filed with the EIC. CUL-2 All discovered human remains shall be treated with respect and dignity. California State law California Health & Safety Code Section 7050.5) and federal law and regulations Archaeological Resources Protection Act 16 United States Code (USC) 470 & 43 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 7], [Native American Graves Protection & Repatriation Act 25 USC 3001 & 43 CFR 10] and [Public Lands, Interior 43 CFR 8365.1–7]) require a defined protocol if human remains are discovered in the State of California regardless of whether the remains are modern or archaeological in origin. If human remains, grave goods, ceremonial items, and/or sacred items are encountered, work will immediately halt within the immediate area and any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains, and a 100-foot ESA boundary will be established to protect the find from impact, and the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians and the City of San Jacinto Planning Division shall be immediately notified. In accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e), if human remains are found, the Riverside County Coroner’s office shall be notified by the permittee within 24 hours of the discovery. County Coroner’s determination regarding the origin of the remains and any required notification is described in Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e). No further excavation or disturbance of the potential human remains, or any area reasonably suspected to overlie additional remains, shall occur until a determination 5.1.i Packet Pg. 250 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 has been made, any notifications have been sent and received, and the Riverside County Coroner’s Office has cleared the site. 4.5.4 Conclusion Implementation of Mitigation Measure CUL-1 and CUL-2, would reduce potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Cultural Resources to less than significant. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 251 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 4.6 Energy Information and analysis in this section is derived from the documents incorporated by reference as identified in Section 1.3 of this document and from the Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study prepared by MD Acoustics and dated April 28, 2025, and included as Appendix A-1. Information from the CalEEMod 2022.1.1.22 Daily and Annual Outputs contained in Appendix A-1 was utilized for this analysis, and the CalEEMod outputs detail Project related construction equipment, transportation energy demands, and facility energy demands. 4.6.1 Regulatory Setting The discussion below provides a summary of key standards relative to this Project. A more detailed list of standards is provided in Appendix A-1. Building Energy Efficiency Standards California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 6. CCR Title 24, Part 6, which is California’s Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24) was first established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption. The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficiency technologies and methods. The Energy Commission adopted 2008 Standards on April 23, 2008 and Building Standards Commission approved them for publication on September 11, 2008. These updates became effective on August 1, 2009. 2013 and 2016 standards have been approved and became effective July 1, 2014 and January 1, 2016, respectively. California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 11 , commonly referred to as the CALGreen Code, states that all buildings for which an application for a building permit is submitted on or after January 1, 2023 must follow the 2022 standards. Energy efficient buildings require less electricity; therefore, increased energy efficiency reduces fossil fuel consumption and decreases greenhouse gas emissions. The CALGreen Code includes mandatory measures for non-residential development related to site development; energy efficiency; water efficiency and conservation; material conservation and resource efficiency; and environmental quality. Specifically, the code requires the following measures that are applicable to energy use: x New buildings with tenant spaces that have 10 or more tenant-occupants to provide secure bicycle parking for 5 percent of the tenant-occupant vehicular parking spaces with a minimum of one bicycle parking facility. x New buildings that require 10 or more parking spaces to provide a specific number of spaces to facilitate the future installation of electric vehicle supply equipment. The raceways are required to be installed at the time of construction. Senate Bill 100 Senate Bill 100 (SB 100) was signed into law September 2018 and increased the goal of the California RPS Program to achieve at least 50 percent renewable resources by 2026, 60 percent renewable resources by 2030, and 100 percent renewable resources by 2045. SB 100 also includes a State policy that eligible renewable energy resources and zero-carbon resources supply 100 percent of all retail sales of electricity to California end-use customers and 100 percent of electricity procured to serve all State agencies by December 31, 2045. Under the bill, the State cannot increase carbon emissions elsewhere in the western grid or allow resource shuffling to achieve the 100 percent carbon-free electricity target. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 252 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 4.6.2 Environmental Setting California is one of the lowest per capita energy users in the United States, ranked 48th in the nation, due to its energy efficiency programs and mild climate (United States Energy Information Administration [EIA] 2018). California consumed 292,039 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of electricity and 2,110,829 million cubic feet of natural gas in 2017 (California Energy Commission [CEC] 2019; EIA 2018). In addition, Californians consume approximately 18.9 billion gallons of motor vehicle fuels per year (Federal Highway Administration 2019). The single largest end-use sector for energy consumption in California is transportation (39.8 percent), followed by industry (23.7 percent), commercial (18.9 percent), and residential (17.7 percent) (EIA 2018). Most of California’s electricity is generated in-state with approximately 30 percent imported from the Northwest (Alberta, British Columbia, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, South Dakota, Washington, and Wyoming) and Southwest (Arizona, Baja California, Colorado, Mexico, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, and Utah) in 2017. In addition, approximately 30 percent of California’s electricity supply comes from renewable energy sources such as wind, solar photovoltaic, geothermal, and biomass (CEC 2018). Adopted on September 10, 2018, SB 100 accelerates the State’s Renewables Portfolio Standards Program by requiring electricity providers to increase procurement from eligible renewable energy resources to 33 percent of total retail sales by 2020, 60 percent by 2030, and 100 percent by 2045. To reduce statewide vehicle emissions, California requires that all motorists use California Reformulated Gasoline, which is sourced almost exclusively from refineries located in California. Gasoline is the most used transportation fuel in California with 15.5 billion gallons sold in 2017 and is used by light-duty cars, pickup trucks, and sport utility vehicles (California Department of Tax and Fee Administration 2018). Diesel is the second most used fuel in California with 4.2 billion gallons sold in 2015 and is used primarily by heavy duty- trucks, delivery vehicles, buses, trains, ships, boats and barges, farm equipment, and heavy-duty construction and military vehicles (CEC 2016). Both gasoline and diesel are primarily petroleum-based, and their consumption releases greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including CO2 and NOX. The transportation sector is the single largest source of GHG emissions in California, accounting for 41 percent of all inventoried emissions in 2016 (California Air Resources Board [CARB] 2018). 4.6.3 Impact Analysis Impact Less Than Significant Impact Would the project: a) Result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project X X Discussion a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? Less Than Significant Impact. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 253 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Construction Energy Demand Construction Equipment Electricity Usage. Electrical service will be provided by SCE. Based on the 2017 National Construction Estimator, the typical power cost per 1,000 square feet of building construction per month is estimated to be $2.32. The energy analysis provided in Appendix A-1 was prepared assuming project plans to develop the site with approximately 817,050 square feet of new residential space over the course of approximately 39 months. Based on Table 13, Project Construction Power Cost and Electricity Usage, the total power cost of the on-site electricity usage during the construction of the Proposed Project is estimated to be approximately $73,926.68 and the total electricity usage from Project construction related activities is estimated to be approximately 1,344,122 kilowatt-hours kWh). Table 13: Project Construction Power Cost and Electricity Usage Power Cost per 1,000 square fee building per month of Size (1,000 Total Total 2.32 817.050 39 $73,926.68 $0.06 1,344,122 Assumes the project will be under the GS-1 General Service rate under SCE. Source: Appendix A-1 Construction Equipment Fuel Estimates. Using the CalEEMod data input, the Project’s construction phase would consume electricity and fossil fuels as a single energy demand, that is, once construction is completed their use would cease. CARB’s 2017 Emissions Factors Tables show that on average aggregate fuel consumption (gasoline and diesel fuel) would be approximately 18.5 horsepower hours per gallon (hp-hr/gal). As presented in Table 14, Construction Equipment Fuel Consumption Estimates below, the Proposed Project construction activities would consume an estimated 108,685 gallons of diesel fuel. Table 14: Construction Equipment Fuel Consumption Estimates HP hrs/(gal diesel 1 Demolition 30 Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 33 0.73 193 313 30 Excavators 3 8 36 0.38 328 532 30 Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8 367 0.4 2,349 3,809 Site Preparation 40 Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8 367 0.4 3,523 7,618 40 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoe s 4 8 84 0.37 995 2,150 Grading 110 Excavators 2 8 36 0.38 219 1,301 110 Graders 1 8 148 0.41 485 2,886 110 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 367 0.4 1,174 6,983 110 Scrapers 2 8 423 0.48 3,249 19,316 110 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 84 0.37 497 2,957 Building Construction 5.1.i Packet Pg. 254 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Phase Number of Days Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor HP hrs/(gal diesel 1 500 Welders 1 8 46 0.45 166 4,476 Paving 75 Pavers 2 8 81 0.42 544 2,207 75 Paving Equipment 2 8 89 0.36 513 2,078 75 Rollers 2 8 36 0.38 219 887 Architectural Coating 90 Air Compressors 1 6 37 0.48 107 518 Construction Fuel Demand (gallons of diesel fuel) 108,685 Notes: 1 Construction Worker Fuel Estimates. It is assumed that all construction worker trips are from light duty autos (LDA) along area roadways. With respect to estimated vehicle miles travelled (VMT), the construction worker trips would generate an estimated 3,772,243 VMT. Vehicle fuel efficiencies for construction workers were estimated in the air quality and greenhouse gas analysis using information generated using CARB’s EMFAC model (see Appendix A-1 for details). Table 15: Construction Worker Fuel Consumption Estimates, shows that an estimated 121,882 gallons of fuel would be consumed for construction worker trips. Table 15: Construction Worker Fuel Consumption Estimates Number Worker Vehicle Economy Consumption Demolition 30 15.0 18.5 8,325 30.95 269 Site Preparation 40 17.5 18.5 12,950 30.95 418 Grading 110 20.0 18.5 40,700 30.95 1,315 Building Construction 500 385.0 18.5 3,561,250 30.95 115,065 Paving 75 15.0 18.5 20,813 30.95 672 Architectural Coating 90 77.0 18.5 128,205 30.95 4,142 Total Construction Worker Fuel Consumption 121,882 Notes: 1 Assumptions for the worker trip length and vehicle miles traveled are consistent with CalEEMod 2022.1.1.22 defaults. Construction Vendor/Hauling Fuel Estimates. Table 16: Construction Vendor Fuel Consumption Estimates (MHD Trucks) and Table 17: Construction Hauling Fuel Consumption Estimates (HHD Trucks) show the estimated fuel consumption for vendor and hauling during building construction and architectural coating. With respect to estimated VMT, the vendor and hauling trips would generate an estimated 1,000,455 VMT. For the architectural coatings it is assumed that the contractors would be responsible for bringing coatings and equipment with them in their light duty vehicles. Table 16 and Table 17 show that an estimated 134,056 gallons of fuel would be consumed for vendor and hauling trips. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 255 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Table 16: Construction Vendor Fuel Consumption Estimates (MHD Trucks) Number Worker Vehicle Economy Consumption Demolition 30 0 10.2 0 9.22 0 Site Preparation 40 0 10.2 0 9.22 0 Grading 110 0 10.2 0 9.22 0 Building Construction 500 68.4 10.2 348,840 9.22 37,835 Paving 75 15.0 10.2 11,475 9.22 1,245 Architectural Coating 90 0 10.2 0 9.22 0 Total Vendor Fuel Consumption 39,080 Notes: 1 Assumptions for the vendor trip length and vehicle miles traveled are consistent with CalEEMod 2022.1.1.22 defaults. Table 17: Construction Hauling Fuel Consumption Estimates (HHD Trucks) Number Worker Vehicle Economy Consumption Demolition 30 10.9 20 6,540 6.74 970 Site Preparation 40 0.0 20 0 6.74 0 Grading 110 288.0 20 633,600 6.74 94,006 Building Construction 500 0 20 0 6.74 0 Paving 75 0 20 0 6.74 0 Architectural Coating 90 0 20 0 6.74 0 Total Construction Hauling Fuel Consumption 94,976 Notes: 1 Assumptions for hauling trip length and vehicle miles traveled are consistent with CalEEMod 2022.1.1.22 defaults. Construction Energy Efficiency/Conservation Measures. Construction equipment used over the approximately 39 month construction phase would conform to CARB regulations and California emissions standards and is evidence of related fuel efficiencies. In addition, the CARB Airborne Toxic Control Measure limits idling times of construction vehicles to no more than five minutes, thereby minimizing unnecessary and wasteful consumption of fuel due to unproductive idling of construction equipment. Furthermore, the Project has been designed in compliance with California’s Energy Efficiency Standards and 2022 California Green Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 11 (CALGreen). Construction of the proposed residential development would require the typical use of energy resources. There are no unusual Project characteristics or construction processes that would require the use of equipment that would be more energy intensive than is used for comparable activities or equipment that would not conform to current emissions standards (and related fuel efficiencies). Therefore, the proposed construction activities would not result in inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary fuel consumption and no mitigation is required. Operational Energy Demand Transportation Fuel Consumption. The largest source of operational energy use would be vehicle operation of customers. The site is located in an urbanized area just in close proximity to transit stops. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 256 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Using the CalEEMod output, it is assumed that an average trip length would be 9.944 miles. To show a worst-case analysis, as the Proposed Project is a residential project, it was assumed that vehicles would operate 365 days per year. Table 18: Estimated Vehicle Operations Fuel Consumption, shows the worst-case estimated annual fuel consumption for all classes of vehicles from autos to heavy-heavy trucks. Table 18 shows that an estimated 571,336 gallons of fuel would be consumed per year for the operation of the proposed Project. Table 18: Estimated Vehicle Operations Fuel Consumption Trip 2 Fuel Total Gallons Fuel Light Auto Automobile 2,194 9.944 21,813 31.82 685.52 250,215 Light Truck Automobile 229 9.944 2,280 27.16 83.96 30,645 Light Truck Automobile 706 9.944 7,024 25.6 274.37 100,145 Medium Truck Automobile 564 9.944 5,613 20.81 269.74 98,454 Light Heavy Truck 2-Axle Truck 106 9.944 1,051 13.81 76.08 27,769 Light Heavy Truck 10,000 lbs + 2-Axle Truck 29 9.944 292 14.18 20.57 7,507 Medium Heavy Truck 3-Axle Truck 47 9.944 464 9.58 48.46 17,688 Heavy Heavy Truck 4-Axle Truck 77 9.944 761 7.14 106.61 38,913 Total 3,952 -- 39,298 -- 1565.30 -- Total Annual Fuel Consumption 571,336 Notes: 1 The project is to generate 3,952 total net new trips after reduction of existing uses. Default CalEEMod vehicle fleet mix utilized. 2 Based on the size of the site and relative location, trips were assumed to be local rather than regional. Trip generation generated by the proposed Project are consistent with other similar residential uses of similar scale and configuration as reflected in the traffic data. That is, the Proposed Project does not propose uses or operations that would inherently result in excessive and wasteful vehicle trips, nor associated excess and wasteful vehicle energy consumption. Therefore, Project transportation energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary. Facility Energy Demands (Electricity) The annual electricity demands were provided per the CalEEMod output and are provided in Table 19: Project Unmitigated Annual Operational Energy Demand Summary. The Project will be 100 percent electric and will not require natural gas. Table 19: Project Unmitigated Annual Operational Energy Demand Summary Single Family Housing 8,280,326 Total 8,280,326 Notes: 1 Taken from the CalEEMod 2022.1.1.22 annual output. As shown in Table 19, the estimated electricity demand for the Proposed Project is approximately 8,280,326 kWh per year. In 2022, the residential sector of the County of Riverside consumed approximately 9,061 million kWh of electricity. Therefore, the increase in electricity demand from the proposed Project is insignificant compared to the County’s 2022 demand. However, electricity for the 5.1.i Packet Pg. 257 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 homes in the Project will also be provided by onsite solar which will not affect the County’s demand. Therefore, the increase in electricity demand from the proposed Project is insignificant compared to the County’s 2022 demand, and impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? Less Than Significant Impact. This analysis considers whether the Project would conflict with applicable federal transportation regulations, the State’s Energy Plan, and the State’s Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards. Regarding federal transportation regulations, the Proposed Project Site is located in an already developed area. Access to/from the Proposed Project Site is from existing roads. These roads are already in place so the Project would not interfere with, nor otherwise obstruct intermodal transportation plans or Projects that may be proposed pursuant to the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) because SCAG is not planning for intermodal facilities in the Project area. Regarding the State’s Energy Plan and compliance with Title 24 CCR energy efficiency standards, the applicant is required to comply with the California Green Building Standard Code requirements for energy efficient buildings and appliances as well as utility energy efficiency programs implemented by the SCE and Southern California Gas Company. Regarding the State’s Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards, the Project would be required to meet or exceed the energy standards established in the CALGreen Code. CALGreen Standards require that new buildings reduce water consumption, employ building commissioning to increase building system efficiencies, divert construction waste from landfills, and install low pollutant-emitting finish materials. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with or obstruct a State or the General Plan policies for energy efficiency, and less than significant impacts would occur. No mitigation is required. 4.6.4 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Energy apply to the Proposed Project. 4.6.5 Conclusion There would be less than significant of the Proposed Project associated with Energy resources, and no mitigation would be required. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 258 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 4.7 Geology and Soils 4.7.1 Environmental Setting Information and analysis in this section is derived from the documents incorporated by reference as identified in Section 1.3 of this document and from an updated, Project-specific Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Geotechnical Evaluation) prepared by Geocon West Inc., dated November 4, 2022, and included as Appendix D-1. An updated geotechnical evaluation was prepared in January 2024 and it is provided in Appendix D-2. 4.7.2 Impact Analysis Impact Mitigation Would the project: a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Spec X Strong seismic ground shaking? X Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? X Landslides? X X and potentially result in on- site or off-site landslide, X of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating X of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the X X 5.1.i Packet Pg. 259 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Discussion a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Less Than Significant Impact. According to the Geotechnical Evaluation, the Proposed Project Site is not located within a currently established State of California Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone or Riverside County Fault Hazard Zone for surface fault rupture hazards (Appendix D-1). No active or potentially active faults with the potential for surface fault rupture are known to pass directly beneath the site. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Strong seismic ground shaking? Less Than Significant Impact. The Proposed Project Site is located in a seismically active area, as is the majority of southern California, and there is potential for strong ground motion in the Project areas during the Project’s lifetime. The closest active fault to the site is the Casa Loma branch of the San Jacinto fault located approximately ¾ mile northeast of the site. This fault, among others within the area, would have the potential to produce an earthquake estimated up to 6.9 on the Richter Scale (Appendix D). In the event an earthquake of this magnitude occurs, the Proposed Project Site could experience periodic shaking, possibly of considerable intensity. The Project’s proposed structures would be required to meet the City’s construction development standards and the seismic design parameters of the California Uniform Building Code to withstand potential seismic shaking impacts caused by an earthquake within an acceptable level of risk. In addition, the specific recommendations of the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared for the Project would be fully incorporated in the design and construction of the Project. Compliance with the California Uniform Building Code Seismic Safety Standards and Geotechnical Investigation recommendations would minimize risks related to seismic shaking impacts and reduce the potential for adverse effects to less than significant, and no mitigation is required. Seismic related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less Than Significant Impact. Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which loose, saturated, relatively cohesionless soil deposits lose shear strength during strong ground motions. Primary factors controlling liquefaction include intensity and duration of ground motion, gradation characteristics of the subsurface soils, in-situ stress conditions, and the depth to groundwater. Liquefaction is typified by a loss of shear strength in the liquefied layers due to rapid increases in pore water pressure generated by earthquake accelerations. The County of Riverside indicates that the site is located within a zone of moderate liquefaction potential. However, based on historic well records, static groundwater is more than 100 feet below ground surface in the vicinity of the site and the Geotechnical Investigation concluded the potential for liquefaction to occur beneath the site is considered very low (Appendix D). In addition, the specific recommendations of the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared for the Project would be fully incorporated in the design and construction of the Project. Therefore, impacts related to liquefaction would be less than significant levels, and no mitigation is required. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 260 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Landslides? No Impact. Landslides may be induced by strong vibratory motion produced by earthquakes. The Proposed Project Site would not be subject to landslides. According to the California Department of Conservation Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation mapper (CDC 2024), the Proposed Project Site is not identified as being within an area susceptible to landslides. The Proposed Project Site is relatively flat, with elevations ranging from 1,505 feet above mean sea level (AMSL) on the northwestern portion of the site to approximately 1,515 feet AMSL on the southwestern corner of the site. In addition, the specific recommendations of the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared for the Project, including slope stability features, would be fully incorporated in the design and construction of the Project. Due to the relatively low topography, and since the Project does not propose to create slopes or features that would increase the potential for landslides, no adverse impacts are anticipated, and no mitigation is required. Based on the above, the Project will have a less than significant impact regarding exposure people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects of earthquakes, ground shaking, liquefaction and landsides, and no mitigation is required. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant Impact. The largest source of erosion and topsoil loss is uncontrolled drainage during construction. As discussed in more detail in Section XI, Hydrology and Water Quality, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program controls water pollution by regulating point sources that discharge pollutants into “waters of the U.S.” Construction activities shall be conducted in compliance with the statewide NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with the Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Order No 2022-0057-DWQ, NPDES No. CAS000002), adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board on September 8, 2022. In compliance with the NPDES permit, erosion potential during construction of the proposed Project would be managed with Best Management Practices (BMPs) implemented on the Proposed Project Site as part of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction activities in accordance with NPDES requirements. Implementation of the BMPs would reduce construction-related erosion impacts to less than significant levels. Additionally, the specific recommendations of the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared for the Project, including grading and earthwork related recommendations, would be fully incorporated in the design and construction of the Project. Therefore, impacts related to soil erosion would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed above, the potential for liquefaction at the Proposed Project Site is considered low and the Proposed Project Site is not located in a potential landslide zone. The proposed Project would not introduce any new topographical features or elements that would change the existing geologic setting of the Project area, and the majority of the area is relatively flat. As such, on-site geologic and soils issues such as on-site soil stability including landslides, lateral spreading, liquefaction, and collapse are not significant due to the nature of the Project. The report in Appendix D-2 also identified that the potential for subsidence was low because: the site is not located in an Area of Land Subsidence in California according to the United States Geological Survey (USGS); the San Jacinto Valley is not included in an area currently undergoing a USGS subsidence study; Riverside County does include the site in an area of active subsidence; the California Geological Survey does not address subsidence risk on its website; and a search of the City of the San Jacinto website GIS system did not yield results when the term “subsidence” was searched. Additionally, the specific 5.1.i Packet Pg. 261 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 recommendations of the Geotechnical Investigation prepared for the Project (Appendix D-1 and Appendix D-2) would be fully incorporated in the design and construction of the Project. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in impacts associated with unstable geologic conditions. Impacts related to geologic unit stability that could result in lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse would be less than significant. No mitigation is required. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? Less Than Significant Impact. Expansive soils are characterized by their ability to undergo significant volume changes (shrink or swell) due to variations in moisture content the onsite fill consists of sandy silt within the soils encountered near the ground surface. Expansive soils are a contributing factor to building foundation settlement. According to the Geotechnical Evaluation, the upper five feet of existing site soils encountered during the investigation were considered to have a “very low” expansive potential and are classified as “non-expansive” (Appendix D-1). Additionally, the specific recommenda- tions of the Geotechnical Evaluation prepared for the Project would be fully incorporated in the design and construction of the Project. Therefore, Project impacts related to expansive soils would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact. The Project does not propose to install septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. No impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. f) Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. Psomas requested a literature and records search from the WSC on November 21, 2022 (refer to the Phase I Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Inventory in Appendix C). The WSC houses records regarding paleontological resources recorded in Riverside County. The records search included a 1.6-km (1-mile) search radius around the Proposed Project Site and consisted of a detailed examination of the USGS’ 7.5-minute Lakeview Quadrangle. The purpose of the literature search was to identify paleontological resources and/or unique geological units previously recorded within and around the Proposed Project Site. The WSC paleontological literature review and record searches did not identify paleontological resources within the Proposed Project Site or the 1-mile search buffer/radius. Furthermore, the WSC noted that the geologic units underlying the Proposed Project Site are mapped entirely as active valley deposits dating to the Holocene which is estimated to be between 5,000 years old and present. While Holocene alluvial units are of high preservation value, material found is unlikely to be fossil material due to the relatively modern associated dates of the deposits. However, the WSC also noted that if development requires any substantial depth of disturbance, the likelihood of reaching older Holocene or Late Pleistocene alluvial sediments would increase. The paleontological search results summary letter from WSC is presented in Appendix C. Psomas surveyed the Proposed Project Site on February 9, 2023. The results of the field survey were negative for paleontological resources. However, the negative results only include an examination of the surface. Therefore, there is a possibility that intact paleontological resources may be present below the surface. A significant impact could occur if grading or excavation activities associated with the Project were to disturb paleontological resources that presently exist within the Project site. These potential effects may be mitigated to a less than significant level with the implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1, which requires retention of a qualified Paleontologist to be available “on-call” 5.1.i Packet Pg. 262 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 throughout the duration of grading activities, would reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels. 4.7.3 Mitigation Measures GEO-1 In the event that potential paleontological resources are discovered during ground- disturbing activities, work will stop in that area and within 30 feet of the find until a qualified paleontologist can assess the significance of the find and, if necessary, develop appropriate treatment measures. Treatment measures may include monitoring by a qualified paleontologist during construction-related ground- disturbing activities. The monitor will retain the option to reduce monitoring if it is determined that the sediments were previously disturbed. Monitoring may also be reduced if potentially fossiliferous units are not present or, if present, are determined to have a low potential to contain fossil resources. The monitor will be equipped to salvage fossils and samples of sediments as they are unearthed and will be empowered to temporarily halt or divert equipment to allow removal of abundant or large specimens. Recovered specimens will be prepared to a point of identification and permanent preservation, including washing of sediments to recover small invertebrates and vertebrates. Specimens will be curated into a professional, accredited museum repository with permanent retrievable storage. A report of findings, with an appended itemized inventory of specimens, will be prepared and will signify completion of the mitigation. 4.7.4 Conclusion Implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1 would reduce potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Geology and Soils to less than significant. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 263 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Information and analysis in this section is derived from the documents incorporated by reference as identified in Section 1.3 of this document and the Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared for the Project as part of the Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study (Appendix A-1), and all information in this section is derived from Appendix A-1. 4.8.1 Environmental Setting Constituent gases of the Earth’s atmosphere, called atmospheric GHGs, play a critical role in the Earth’s radiation amount by trapping infrared radiation emitted from the Earth’s surface, which otherwise would have escaped to space. Prominent greenhouse gases contributing to this process include carbon dioxide CO2), methane (CH4), ozone, water vapor, nitrous oxide (N2O), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). This phenomenon, known as the Greenhouse Effect, is responsible for maintaining a habitable climate. Anthropogenic (caused or produced by humans) emissions of these greenhouse gases in excess of natural ambient concentrations are responsible for the enhancement of the Greenhouse Effect and have led to a trend of unnatural warming of the Earth’s natural climate, known as global warming or climate change. Emissions of gases that induce global warming are attributable to human activities associated with industrial/manufacturing, agriculture, utilities, transportation, and residential land uses. Transportation is responsible for 41 percent of the State’s greenhouse gas emissions, followed by electricity generation. Emissions of CO2 and N2O are byproducts of fossil fuel combustion. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, results from off-gassing associated with agricultural practices and landfills. Sinks of CO2, where CO2 is stored outside of the atmosphere, include uptake by vegetation and dissolution into the ocean. Table 20: GHG Descriptions, provides a description of each of the greenhouse gases and their global warming potential. Table 20: GHG Descriptions Nitrous oxide Nitrous oxide (N2 some industrial processes acid 4 of organic matter. Methane is 2 5.1.i Packet Pg. 264 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Greenhouse Gas Description and Physical Properties Sources 4.8.2 Regulatory Background Federal Greenhouse Gas Endangerment. On December 2, 2009, the EPA announced that GHGs threaten the public health and welfare of the American people. The EPA also states that GHG emissions from on-road vehicles contribute to that threat. The decision was based on Massachusetts v. EPA (Supreme Court Case 05-1120) which argued that GHGs are air pollutants covered by the Clean Air Act and that the EPA has authority to regulate those emissions. Clean Vehicles. Congress first passed the Corporate Average Fuel Economy law in 1975 to increase the fuel economy of cars and light duty trucks. The law has become more stringent over time. On May 19, 2009, President Obama put in motion a new national policy to increase fuel economy for all new cars and trucks sold in the United States. On April 1, 2010, the EPA and the Department of Transportation’s National Highway Safety Administration announced a joint final rule establishing a national program that would reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve fuel economy for new cars and trucks sold in the United States. The first phase of the national program would apply to passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty passenger vehicles, covering model years 2012 through 2016. They require these vehicles to meet an estimated combined average emissions level of 250 grams of carbon dioxide per mile, equivalent to 35.5 miles per gallon if the automobile industry were to meet this carbon dioxide level solely through fuel economy improvements. Together, these standards would cut carbon dioxide emissions by an estimated 960 million metric tons and 1.8 billion barrels of oil over the lifetime of the vehicles sold under the program (model years 5.1.i Packet Pg. 265 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 2012-2016). The second phase of the national program would involve proposing new fuel economy and greenhouse gas standards for model years 2017-2025 by September 1, 2011. On October 25, 2010, the EPA and the U.S. Department of Transportation proposed the first national standards to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve fuel efficiency of heavy- duty trucks and buses. For combination tractors, the agencies are proposing engine and vehicle standards that begin in the 2014 model year and achieve up to a 20 percent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions and fuel consumption by the 2018 model year. For heavy-duty pickup trucks and vans, the agencies are proposing separate gasoline and diesel truck standards, which phase in starting in the 2014 model year and achieve up to a 10 percent reduction for gasoline vehicles and 15 percent reduction for diesel vehicles by 2018 model year (12 and 17 percent respectively if accounting for air conditioning leakage). Lastly, for vocational vehicles, the agencies are proposing engine and vehicle standards starting in the 2014 model year which would achieve up to a 10 percent reduction in fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions by 2018 model year. Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases. On January 1, 2010, the EPA started requiring large emitters of heat-trapping emissions to begin collecting GHG data under a new reporting system. Under the rule, suppliers of fossil fuels or industrial greenhouse gases, manufacturers of vehicles and engines, and facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons or more per year of greenhouse gas emissions are required to submit annual reports to the EPA. Climate Adaption Plan. The EPA Plan identifies priority actions the Agency will take to incorporate considerations of climate change into its programs, policies, rules and operations to ensure they are effective under future climatic conditions. State California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 6. CCR Title 24, Part 6: California’s Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24) were first established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption. The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficiency technologies and methods. Although it was not originally intended to reduce GHG emissions, electricity production by fossil fuels results in GHG emissions and energy efficient buildings require less electricity. Therefore, increased energy efficiency results in decreased GHG emissions. The Energy Commission adopted 2008 Standards on April 23, 2008 and Building Standards Commission approved them for publication on September 11, 2008. These updates became effective on August 1, 2009. 2013 and 2016 standards have been approved and became effective July 1, 2014 and January 1, 2016, respectively. California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 11. All buildings for which an application for a building permit is submitted on or after January 1, 2023 must follow the 2022 standards. Energy efficient buildings require less electricity; therefore, increased energy efficiency reduces fossil fuel consumption and decreases greenhouse gas emissions. California Green Building Standards. On January 12, 2010, the State Building Standards Commission unanimously adopted updates to the California Green Building Standards Code, which went into effect on January 1, 2011. The Housing and Community Development (HCD) updated CALGreen through the 2015 Triennial Code Adoption Cycle, during the 2016 to 2017 fiscal year. During the 2022-2023 fiscal year, the HCD updated CALGreen through the 2023 Triennial Code Adoption Cycle. The Code is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all residential, commercial and school buildings. CCR Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards (Title 24) became effective in 2001 in response to continued efforts to reduce GHG emissions associated with energy consumption. CCR Title 24, 5.1.i Packet Pg. 266 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Part 11 now require that new buildings reduce water consumption, employ building commissioning to increase building system efficiencies, divert construction waste from landfills, and install low pollutant- emitting finish materials. One focus of CCR Title 24, Part 11 is water conservation measures, which reduce GHG emissions by reducing electrical consumption associated with pumping and treating water. CCR Title 24, Part 11 has approximately 52 nonresidential mandatory measures and an additional 130 provisions for optional use. Some key mandatory measures for commercial occupancies include specified parking for clean air vehicles, a 20 percent reduction of potable water use within buildings, a 50 percent construction waste diversion from landfills, use of building finish materials that emit low levels of volatile organic compounds, and commissioning for new, nonresidential buildings over 10,000 square feet. The CEC estimates that over 30 years the 2022 Energy Code will provide $1.5 billion in consumer benefits and reduce 10 million metric tons of GHG. Changes compared to the 2019 Energy Code include increases to on- site renewable energy generation from solar, increases to electric load flexibility to support grid reliability, reduction of emissions from newly constructed buildings, reduction of air pollution for improved public health, and increased adoption of environmentally beneficial efficient electric technologies. The California Green Building Standards Code does not prevent a local jurisdiction from adopting a more stringent code as state law provides methods for local enhancements. The Code recognizes that many jurisdictions have developed existing construction and demolition ordinances, and defers to them as the ruling guidance provided, they provide a minimum 50- percent diversion requirement. The code also provides exemptions for areas not served by construction and demolition recycling infrastructure. State building code provides the minimum standard that buildings need to meet in order to be certified for occupancy. Executive Order S-3-05. California Governor issued Executive Order S-3-05, GHG Emission, in June 2005, which established the following targets: x By 2010, California shall reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 2000 levels; x By 2020, California shall reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels. x By 2050, California shall reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels. The executive order directed the secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) to coordinate a multi-agency effort to reduce GHG emissions to the target levels. To comply with the Executive Order, the secretary of CalEPA created the California Climate Action Team (CAT), made up of members from various state agencies and commissions. The team released its first report in March 2006. The report proposed to achieve the targets by building on the voluntary actions of businesses, local governments, and communities and through State incentive and regulatory programs. Executive Order S-01-07. Executive Order S-1-07 was issued in 2007 and proclaims that the transportation sector is the main source of GHG emissions in the State, since it generates more than 40 percent of the State’s GHG emissions. It establishes a goal to reduce the carbon intensity of transportation fuels sold in the State by at least ten percent by 2020. This Order also directs CARB to determine whether this Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) could be adopted as a discrete early-action measure as part of the effort to meet the mandates in AB 32. On April 23, 2009, CARB approved the proposed regulation to implement the low carbon fuel standard. The low carbon fuel standard is anticipated to reduce GHG emissions by about 16 million metric tons (MMT) per year by 2020. The low carbon fuel standard is designed to provide a framework that uses market mechanisms to spur the steady introduction of lower carbon fuels. The framework establishes performance standards that fuel producers and importers must meet each year beginning in 2011. Separate standards are established for gasoline and diesel fuels and the alternative fuels that can replace each. The standards are back-loaded,” with more reductions required in the last five years, than the first five years. This schedule 5.1.i Packet Pg. 267 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 allows for the development of advanced fuels that are lower in carbon than today’s fuels and the market penetration of plug- in hybrid electric vehicles, battery electric vehicles, fuel cell vehicles, and flexible fuel vehicles. It is anticipated that compliance with the low carbon fuel standard will be based on a combination of both lower carbon fuels and more efficient vehicles. Reformulated gasoline mixed with corn-derived ethanol at ten percent by volume and low sulfur diesel fuel represent the baseline fuels. Lower carbon fuels may be ethanol, biodiesel, renewable diesel, or blends of these fuels with gasoline or diesel as appropriate. Compressed natural gas and liquefied natural gas also may be low carbon fuels. Hydrogen and electricity, when used in fuel cells or electric vehicles are also considered as low carbon fuels for the low carbon fuel standard. SB 97. Senate Bill 97 (SB 97) was adopted August 2007 and acknowledges that climate change is a prominent environmental issue that requires analysis under CEQA. SB 97 directed the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), which is part of the State Resource Agency, to prepare, develop, and transmit to CARB guidelines for the feasible mitigation of GHG emissions or the effects of GHG emissions, as required by CEQA, by July 1, 2009. The Resources Agency was required to certify and adopt those guidelines by January 1, 2010. Pursuant to the requirements of SB 97 as stated above, on December 30, 2009 the Natural Resources Agency adopted amendments to the CEQA guidelines that address GHG emissions. The CEQA Guidelines Amendments changed 14 sections of the CEQA Guidelines and incorporate GHG language throughout the Guidelines. However, no GHG emissions thresholds of significance are provided and no specific mitigation measures are identified. The GHG emission reduction amendments went into effect on March 18, 2010 and are summarized below: x Climate action plans and other greenhouse gas reduction plans can be used to determine whether a project has significant impacts, based upon its compliance with the plan. x Local governments are encouraged to quantify the greenhouse gas emissions of proposed projects, noting that they have the freedom to select the models and methodologies that best meet their needs and circumstances. The section also recommends consideration of several qualitative factors that may be used in the determination of significance, such as the extent to which the given project complies with state, regional, or local GHG reduction plans and policies. OPR does not set or dictate specific thresholds of significance. Consistent with existing CEQA Guidelines, OPR encourages local governments to develop and publish their own thresholds of significance for GHG impacts assessment. x When creating their own thresholds of significance, local governments may consider the thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by other public agencies, or recommended by experts. x New amendments include guidelines for determining methods to mitigate the effects of greenhouse gas emissions in Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines. x OPR is clear to state that “to qualify as mitigation, specific measures from an existing plan must be identified and incorporated into the project; general compliance with a plan, by itself, is not mitigation.” x OPR’s emphasizes the advantages of analyzing GHG impacts on an institutional, programmatic level. OPR therefore approves tiering of environmental analyses and highlights some benefits of such an approach. x Environmental impact reports (EIRs) must specifically consider a project's energy use and energy efficiency potential. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 268 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 AB 32. The California State Legislature enacted AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. AB 32 requires that greenhouse gases emitted in California be reduced to 1990 levels by the year 2020. Greenhouse gases” as defined under AB 32 include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride. ARB is the state agency charged with monitoring and regulating sources of greenhouse gases. AB 32 states the following: Global warming poses a serious threat to the economic well-being, public health, natural resources, and the environment of California. The potential adverse impacts of global warming include the exacerbation of air quality problems, a reduction in the quality and supply of water to the state from the Sierra snowpack, a rise in sea levels resulting in the displacement of thousands of coastal businesses and residences, damage to marine ecosystems and the natural environment, and an increase in the incidences of infectious diseases, asthma, and other human health-related problems. The ARB Board approved the 1990 greenhouse gas emissions level of 427 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) on December 6, 2007 (CARB 2007). Therefore, emissions generated in California in 2020 are required to be equal to or less than 427 million MTCO2e. Emissions in 2020 in a business as usual” scenario are estimated to be 596 million MTCO2e. Under AB 32, the ARB published its Final Expanded List of Early Action Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions in California. Discrete early action measures are currently underway or are enforceable by January 1, 2010. The ARB has 44 early action measures that apply to the transportation, commercial, forestry, agriculture, cement, oil and gas, fire suppression, fuels, education, energy efficiency, electricity, and waste sectors. Of these early action measures, nine are considered discrete early action measures, as they are regulatory and enforceable by January 1, 2010. The ARB estimates that the 44 recommendations are expected to result in reductions of at least 42 million MTCO2e by 2020, representing approximately 25 percent of the 2020 target. The ARB’s Climate Change Scoping Plan (Scoping Plan) contains measures designed to reduce the State’s emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020 (CARB 2008). The Scoping Plan identifies recommended measures for multiple greenhouse gas emission sectors and the associated emission reductions needed to achieve the year 2020 emissions target—each sector has a different emission reduction target. Most of the measures target the transportation and electricity sectors. As stated in the Scoping Plan, the key elements of the strategy for achieving the 2020 greenhouse gas target include: x Expanding and strengthening existing energy efficiency programs as well as building and appliance standards; x Achieving a statewide renewables energy mix of 33 percent; x Developing a California cap-and-trade program that links with other Western Climate Initiative partner programs to create a regional market system; x Establishing targets for transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions for regions throughout California and pursuing policies and incentives to achieve those targets; x Adopting and implementing measures pursuant to existing State laws and policies, Including California’s clean car standards, goods movement measures, and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard; and x Creating targeted fees, including a public goods charge on water use, fees on high global warming potential gases, and a fee to fund the administrative costs of the State’s long- term commitment to AB 32 implementation. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 269 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 In addition, the Scoping Plan differentiates between “capped” and “uncapped” strategies. “Capped” strategies are subject to the proposed cap-and-trade program. The Scoping Plan states that the inclusion of these emissions within the cap-and trade program will help ensure that the year 2020 emission targets are met despite some degree of uncertainty in the emission reduction estimates for any individual measure. Implementation of the capped strategies is calculated to achieve a sufficient amount of reductions by 2020 to achieve the emission target contained in AB 32. “Uncapped” strategies that will not be subject to the cap- and-trade emissions caps and requirements are provided as a margin of safety by accounting for additional greenhouse gas emission reductions. The 2022 Scoping Plan was adopted by CARB in November 2022 and expands upon earlier plans with a target of reducing GHG emissions to 85 percent below 1990 levels by 2045. Senate Bill 100. Senate Bill 100 (SB 100) requires 100 percent of total retail sales of electricity in California to come from eligible renewable energy resources and zero-carbon resources by December 31, 2045. SB 100 was adopted September 2018. The interim thresholds from prior Senate Bills and Executive Orders would also remain in effect. These include Senate Bill 1078 (SB 1078), which requires retail sellers of electricity, including investor-owned utilities and community choice aggregators, to provide at least 20 percent of their supply from renewable sources by 2017. Senate Bill 107 (SB 107) which changed the target date to 2010. Executive Order S-14-08, which was signed on November 2008 and expanded the State’s Renewable Energy Standard to 33 percent renewable energy by 2020. Executive Order S-21-09 directed the CARB to adopt regulations by July 31, 2010 to enforce S-14-08. Senate Bill X1-2 codifies the 33 percent renewable energy requirement by 2020. SB 375. Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) was adopted September 2008 and aligns regional transportation planning efforts, regional GHG emission reduction targets, and land use and housing allocation. SB 375 requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) to adopt a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) or Alternate Planning Strategy (APS) that will prescribe land use allocation in that MPOs Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). CARB, in consultation with each MPO, will provide each affected region with reduction targets for GHGs emitted by passenger cars and light trucks in the region for the years 2020 and 2035. These reduction targets will be updated every eight years but can be updated every four years if advancements in emissions technologies affect the reduction strategies to achieve the targets. CARB is also charged with reviewing each MPO’s Sustainable Communities Strategy or Alternate Planning Strategy for consistency with its assigned targets. The Proposed Project is located within the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), which has authority to develop the SCS or APS. For the SCAG region, the targets set by CARB are at eight percent below 2005 per capita GHG emissions levels by 2020 and 13 percent below 2005 per capita GHG emissions levels by 2035. On April 4, 2024, SCAG adopted the 2024-2050 RTP/SCS, which meets the CARB emission reduction requirements. City and County land use policies, including General Plans, are not required to be consistent with the RTP and associated SCS or APS. However, new provisions of CEQA would incentivize, through streamlining and other provisions, qualified projects that are consistent with an approved SCS or APS and categorized as “transit priority projects.” Assembly Bill 939 and Senate Bill 1374. Assembly Bill 939 (AB 939) requires that each jurisdiction in California to divert at least 50 percent of its waste away from landfills, whether through waste reduction, recycling or other means. Senate Bill 1374 (SB 1374) requires the California Integrated Waste Management Board to adopt a model ordinance by March 1, 2004 suitable for adoption by any local agency to require 50 to 75 percent diversion of construction and demolition of waste materials from landfills. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 270 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Executive Order S-13-08. Executive Order S-13-08 indicates that “climate change in California during the next century is expected to shift precipitation patterns, accelerate sea level rise and increase temperatures, thereby posing a serious threat to California’s economy, to the health and welfare of its population and to its natural resources.” Pursuant to the requirements in the order, the 2009 California Climate Adaptation Strategy (California Natural Resource Agency 2009) was adopted, which is the “… first statewide, multi-sector, region-specific, and information-based climate change in California, identifying and exploring strategies to adapt to climate change, and specifying a direction for future research. Executive Order B-30-15. Executive Order B-30-15, establishing a new interim statewide greenhouse gas emission reduction target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, was signed by Governor Brown in April 2015. Executive Order B-29-15. Executive Order B-29-15, mandates a statewide 25 percent reduction in potable water usage and was signed into law on April 1, 2015. Executive Order B-37-16. Executive Order B-37-16, continuing the State’s adopted water reduction, was signed into law on May 9, 2016. The water reduction builds off the mandatory 25 percent reduction called for in EO B-29-15. Regional The Project is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the SCAQMD. SCAQMD Regulation XXVII currently includes three rules: x The purpose of Rule 2700 is to define terms and post global warming potentials. x The purpose of Rule 2701, SoCal Climate Solutions Exchange, is to establish a voluntary program to encourage, quantify, and certify voluntary, high quality certified greenhouse gas emission reductions in the SCAQMD. x Rule 2702, Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program, was adopted on February 6, 2009. The purpose of this rule is to create a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program for greenhouse gas emission reductions in the SCAQMD. The SCAQMD will fund projects through contracts in response to requests for proposals or purchase reductions from other parties. SCAQMD Threshold Development The SCAQMD has established recommended significance thresholds for greenhouse gases for local lead agency consideration (“SCAQMD draft local agency threshold”). SCAQMD has published a five-tiered draft GHG threshold which includes a 10,000 metric ton of CO2e per year for stationary/industrial sources and 3,000 metric tons of CO2e per year significance threshold for residential/commercial projects. Tier 3 is anticipated to be the primary tier by which the SCAQMD will determine significance for projects. The Tier 3 screening level for stationary sources is based on an emission capture rate of 90 percent for all new or modified projects. A 90-precent emission capture rate means that 90 percent of total emissions from all new or modified stationary source projects would be subject to CEQA analysis. The 90-percent capture rate GHG significance screening level in Tier 3 for stationary sources was derived using the SCAQMD’s annual Emissions Reporting Program. The current draft thresholds consist of the following tiered approach: x Tier 1 consists of evaluating whether or not the project qualifies for any applicable exemption under CEQA. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 271 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 x Tier 2 consists of determining whether or not the project is consistent with a greenhouse gas reduction plan. If a project is consistent with a qualifying local greenhouse gas reduction plan, it does not have significant greenhouse gas emissions. x Tier 3 consists of screening values, which the lead agency can choose but must be consistent. A project’s construction emissions are averaged over 30 years and are added to a project’s operational emissions. If a project’s emissions are under one of the following screening thresholds, then the project is less than significant: x All land use types: 3,000 MTCO2e per year x Based on land use types: residential is 3,500 MTCO2e per year; commercial is 1,400 MTCO2e per year; mixed use is 3,000 MTCO2e per year; and industrial is 10,000 MTCO2e per year x Tier 4 has the following options: x Option 1: Reduce emissions from business as usual by a certain percentage; this percentage is currently undefined x Option 2: Early implementation of applicable AB 32 Scoping Plan measures x Option 3: Year 2020 target for service populations (SP), which includes residents and employees: 4.8 MTCO2e/SP/year for projects and 6.6 MTCO2e/SP/year for plans; x Option 3, 2035 target: 3.0 MTCO2e/SP/year for projects and 4.1 MTCO2e/SP/year for plans x Tier 5 involves mitigation offsets to achieve target significance threshold. WRCOG Subregional Climate Action Plan The City of San Jacinto is part of the Western Riverside Council of Government (WRCOG). The WRCOG adopted the WRCOG Subregional Climate Action Plan (CAP) in September 2014. Twelve cities in the subregion joined efforts to develop the Subregional CAP, which set forth a subregional emissions reduction target, emissions reduction measures, and action steps to assist each community to demonstrate consistency with California’s Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32). The CAP consists of an emissions reduction target of 15 percent below 2010 levels by 2020, and 49 percent below 2010 levels by 2035. As indicated in the CAP the emission reduction target of 15 percent from 2010 levels equates to a GHG emissions reduction of nearly 2,330,647 metric tons below business-as-usual (BAU) conditions by 2020. In order to reach these goals, the CAP provides feasible strategies, while affording its communities other economic and environmental benefits. Therefore, to determine whether the Project's GHG emissions are significant, this analysis uses the WRCOG CAP. The Project will be subject to the latest requirements of the California Green Building and Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards (currently 2022) which would reduce project-related greenhouse gas emissions. Significance Criteria To determine if a project would have a significant impact on greenhouse gases, the type, level, and impact of emissions generated by the project must be evaluated. The following greenhouse gas significance thresholds are contained in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, and a significant impact would occur if the project would: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment; or b) Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 272 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 However, despite this, currently neither the CEQA statutes, the OPR guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis; as with most environmental topics, significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The SCAQMD has adopted draft interim thresholds. The Project was compared to the Tier 4 per service population threshold, interpolated for opening year 2027 at 3.96 MTCO2e per year per service population. The Project was also compared to the goals of the WRCOG CAP for this analysis. 4.8.3 Impact Analysis Significant Impact Mitigation Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? X b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X Discussion a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Construction GHG Impact Less Than Significant Impact. The greenhouse gas emissions from Project construction equipment and worker vehicles are shown in Table 21: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The emissions are from all phases of construction. The total construction emissions amortized over a period of 30 years are estimated at 97.95 metric tons of CO2e per year. Annual CalEEMod output calculations are provided in Appendix A-1. Table 21: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions Demolition 46.80 13.52 60.32 Site Preparation 96.40 4.23 100.63 Grading 330.00 1,050.30 1,380.30 Building Construction 545.00 765.30 1,310.30 Paving 51.60 22.32 73.92 Coating 3.39 9.74 13.13 Total 1,073.19 1,865.41 2,938.60 Averaged over 30 years2 35.77 62.18 97.95 Notes: 1. MTCO2e=metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (includes carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide). The emissions are averaged over 30 years because the average is added to the operational emissions, pursuant to SCAQMD. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 273 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Operational GHG Impact Operational emissions occur over the life of the Proposed Project. The operational emissions for the Project are 5,354 metric tons of CO2e per year or 3.957 metric tons of CO2e per service population as shown in Table 22: Opening Year Unmitigated Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The Project would be below the 2027 interpolated SCAQMD threshold of 3.96 metric tons of CO2e per service population, and therefore the Project would have a less than significant impact. Table 22: Opening Year Unmitigated Project-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions 2 2 4 2 2 Area Sources2 0.00 7.21 7.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.23 Energy Usage3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mobile Sources4 0.00 4,873.00 4,873.00 0.21 0.23 6.35 4,954.00 Solid Waste5 34.20 0.00 34.20 3.42 0.00 0.00 120.00 Water6 5.41 150.00 155.41 0.56 0.01 0.00 174.00 Refrigeration 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.97 Construction7 0.00 95.24 95.24 0.00 0.01 0.07 97.95 Total Emissions 39.61 5,124.01 5,163.62 4.19 0.25 7.39 5,354.15 Service Population 1,353 Total Emissions per Service Population (MTCO2e/yr/SP) 3.957 2027 Interpolated SCAQMD Threshold (MTCO2e/yr/SP) 3.960 Exceeds Threshold? No Notes: 1 Source: CalEEMod Version 2022.1.1.22 Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscape equipment. Energy usage consist of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage. Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles. Solid waste includes the CO2 and CH4 emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills. Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for transport of water and processing of wastewater. b) Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed Project would have the potential to conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. The City of San Jacinto is participating the WRCOG Subregional Climate Action Plan. The WRCOG Subregional CAP establishes a community-wide emissions reduction target of 15 percent below 2010, following guidance from CARB and the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. CARB and the California Attorney General have determined this approach to be consistent with the state-wide AB 32 goal of reducing emissions to 1990 levels. As shown in Table 23: Applicable WRCPG Subregional CAP Local Reduction Measure Project Comparison, below, the Project is consistent with applicable local reduction measures identified in the WRCOG Subregional CAP and would result in a less than significant impact. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 274 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Table 23: Applicable WRCPG Subregional CAP Local Reduction Measure Project Comparison E-1: Energy Action Plan Improve municipal and community wide energy efficiency and reduce energy consumption through the adoption of local Energy Action Plans Proposed P installations. wide. Division by implementing collection CARB Scoping Plan Consistency The ARB Board approved a Climate Change Scoping Plan in December 2008. The Scoping Plan outlines the State’s strategy to achieve the 2020 greenhouse gas emissions limit. The Scoping Plan “proposes a comprehensive set of actions designed to reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions in California, improve our environment, reduce our dependence on oil, diversify our energy sources, save energy, create new jobs, and enhance public health” (CARB 2008). The measures in the Scoping Plan have been in place since 2012. This Scoping Plan calls for an “ambitious but achievable” reduction in California’s greenhouse gas emissions, cutting approximately 30 percent from business-as-usual emission levels projected for 2020, or about 10 percent from today’s levels. On a per-capita basis, that means reducing annual emissions of 14 tons of carbon dioxide for every man, woman and child in California down to about 10 tons per person by 2020. In May 2014, CARB released its First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan (CARB 2014). This Update identifies the next steps for California’s leadership on climate change. While California 5.1.i Packet Pg. 275 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 continues on its path to meet the near-term 2020 greenhouse gas limit, it must also set a clear path toward long-term, deep GHG emission reductions. This report highlights California’s success to date in reducing its GHG emissions and lays the foundation for establishing a broad framework for continued emission reductions beyond 2020, on the path to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. In November 2017, CARB release the 2017 Scoping Plan. This Scoping Plan incorporates, coordinates, and leverages many existing and ongoing efforts and identifies new policies and actions to accomplish the State’s climate goals, and includes a description of a suite of specific actions to meet the State’s 2030 GHG limit. In addition, Chapter 4 provides a broader description of the many actions and proposals being explored across the sectors, including the natural resources sector, to achieve the State’s mid and long-term climate goals. Guided by legislative direction, the actions identified in the 2017 Scoping Plan reduce overall GHG emissions in California and deliver policy signals that will continue to drive investment and certainty in a low carbon economy. The 2017 Scoping Plan builds upon the successful framework established by the Initial Scoping Plan and First Update, while identifying new, technologically feasible, and cost- effective strategies to ensure that California meets its GHG reduction targets in a way that promotes and rewards innovation, continues to foster economic growth, and delivers improvements to the environment and public health, including in disadvantaged communities. The Plan includes policies to require direct GHG reductions at some of the State’s largest stationary sources and mobile sources. These policies include the use of lower GHG fuels, efficiency regulations, and the Cap-and Trade Program, which constrains and reduces emissions at covered sources. As the latest, 2022 Scoping Plan builds upon previous versions, project consistency with applicable strategies of both the 2008 and 2017 Plan are assessed in Table 24. As shown in Table 24: Project Consistency with CARB Scoping Plan Policies and Measures, the Project is consistent with the applicable strategies and would result in a less than significant impact. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. Furthermore, the Project will also comply with applicable Green Building Standards and City of San Jacinto’s policies regarding sustainability (as dictated by the City's General Plan). With incorporation of regulatory compliance and credit for reductions due to CAPCOA location-based efficiency measures, impacts are considered to be less than significant, further analysis is not warranted. Table 24: Project Consistency with CARB Scoping Plan Policies and Measures California Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Standards – Implement adopted standards and second phase of the program. Align zero- vehicle, alternative Consistent. These are CARB enforced standards; vehicles that access the Project that are required to comply with the would comply with the strategy. Consistent. The Project would be compliant with the current Title 24 standards. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 276 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 Consistent. These are CARB enforced standards; vehicles that access the Project that are required to comply with the Consistent. These are CARB enforced standards; vehicles that access the Project that are required to comply with the standards would comply with the strategy. duty vehicle efficiency measures. Consistent. These are CARB enforced standards; vehicles that access the Project that are required to comply with the standards would comply with the strategy. Consistent. The California Green Building Standards Code proposed Part 11, Title 24) was adopted as part of the California Building Standards Code in the CCR. Part 11 establishes voluntary standards, that are mandatory in the 2022 edition of the Code, on planning and design for Consistent. CARB identified five measures that reduce HFC emissions from vehicular and commercial refrigeration systems; vehicles that access the Project that are required to comply with the measures will comply with the strategy. Consistent. The state is currently developing a regulation to reduce methane emissions from municipal solid waste landfills. The Proposed P Consistent. The Project would comply with all applicable City ordinances and CAL Green requirements. 2017 Scoping Plan Recommended Actions to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions Project Compliance with Recommended Action duty vehicles beyond Consistent. These are CARB enforced standards; vehicles that access the Project that are required to comply with the standards will comply with the strategy. in hybrid light- in hybrid light- Consistent. These are CARB enforced standards; vehicles that access the Project that are required to comply with the standards will comply with the strategy. Implement Mobile Source Strategy: Innovative Clean Transit: Transition to a suite of to-be- ero- emission technology Consistent. These are CARB enforced standards; vehicles that access the Project that are required to comply with the standards will comply with the strategy. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 277 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 7 truck sales in local Consistent. These are CARB enforced standards; vehicles that access the Project that are required to comply with the standards will comply with the strategy. Consistent. The Project will be compliant with the current Title 24 standards. By 2019, develop regulations and programs to support organic waste landfill reduction goals in the SLCP and SB 1383. Consistent. The Project will be required to comply with City programs, such as City’s recycling and waste reduction program, which comply, with the 75 percent reduction required by 2020 per AB 341. Source: Appendix A-1 The Project would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment and would be consistent with the GHG reduction policies adopted in the WRCOG CAP and consequently would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. The impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. 4.8.4 Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures associated with impacts to Greenhouse Gas apply to the Proposed Project. 4.8.5 Conclusion Potential impacts of the Proposed Project associated with Greenhouse Gas Emissions would be less than significant, and no mitigation would be required. 5.1.i Packet Pg. 278 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Information and analysis in this section is derived from the documents incorporated by reference as identified in Section 1.3 of this document and from the Project-specific Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) prepared by Partner Engineering and Science Inc., dated September 30, 2024 and included as Appendix E. 4.9.1 Impact Analysis Impact Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or X environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of X acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed X hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would X an adopted emergency response plan or emergency X indirectly to a significant risk of loss, injury or death X Discussion a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less than Significant Impact. Demolition and construction activities for the proposed Project would involve the use of chemical substances such as solvents, paints, fuel for equipment, and other potentially hazardous materials. Hazards to the environment or the public would typically occur with the transport, use, storage, or disposal of hazardous materials. Demolition and construction activities would be relatively short-term and the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials as part of 5.1.i Packet Pg. 279 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9 these activities would utilize small quantities and be temporary. The contractor would be required to comply with existing regulations for the transport, use, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials to prevent public safety hazards. These regulations include the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, California Hazardous Waste Control Act, and California Accidental Release Prevention Program, among others. Long-term Project operation is not expected to involve the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials in quantities or conditions that would pose a hazard to public health and safety or the environment. No industrial uses or facilities are proposed that might be associated with such routine use, transport, or disposal of such materials. Proposed residential operations would involve the use of cleaning products and occasional use of pesticides and herbicides for landscape maintenance. These materials are common for general maintenance and would not be stored in large quantities that pose a significant health hazard to the public or environment. Therefore, potential impacts would be less than significant. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. As discussed in the Phase I ESA, review of historic sources indicates the site has been used for agricultural purposes since the early 1930s. The Proposed Project Site was initially developed with an ostrich farm and residence which operated as such until the 1940s. The Proposed Project Site was occupied by a cattle ranch between the 1940s until 1976 when Chacon Farms purchased the Proposed Project Site. Operations at Chacon Farms included cattle farming; cultivation of onions, hay, banana squash, carrots, and potatoes; and onion processing and packaging. Formal operation of Chacon Farms concluded in circa 1995 and the agricultural portion of the Proposed Project Site has been leased to various tenant farmers since then and up to the present. Bruno Ranches is the current tenant farmer leasing the agricultural portion of the Proposed Project Site, which cultivates a “Roundup ready” strain of alfalfa not requiring application of pesticides Appendix E). The objective of a Phase I ESA is to identify the presence of Recognized Environmental Conditions RECs), defined by the American Society for Testing and Materials as: The presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property 1) due to any release to the environment; 2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or 3) under conditions which pose a material threat of future release to the environment. As stated above, agricultural chemicals such as pesticides and fertilizers have likely been applied to crops grown on the Proposed Project Site. However, the Phase I ESA does not consider the legal application of agricultural chemicals as an REC, since agricultural chemicals in use today are typically regulated by State or local agencies and experience with surface soil sampling and analysis from properties with similar agricultural histories has typically revealed non-detectable or very low concentrations of environmentally persistent agricultural chemicals. In addition, the Phase I ESA notes that no specific areas of concern e.g. product mishandling, releases, spills, incidents, etc.) related to agricultural chemical storage and use at the Proposed Project Site were identified. Based on the continued use of the Proposed Project Site for agricultural purposes and the absence of specific areas of concern associated with agricultural chemical storage and use, the current and historical agricultural use of the Proposed Project Site is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern (Appendix E). During site reconnaissance, hydraulic oil, propane, and gasoline tanks were found on-site. However, the materials were found to be properly labeled and stored with no signs of leaks, stains, or spills. Based on the nature of use and overall small quantities and lack of violations on-file with the local health department, these materials are not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. Three 250-gallon diesel aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) were also observed stored atop a truck bed 5.1.i Packet Pg. 280 At t a c h m e n t M i t i g a t e d N e g a t i v e D e c l a r a t i o n C h a c o n F a r m s P R O J 2 3 0 0 2 9