The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 9/19/1995 I( nn • AGENDA SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY DATE: September 19, 1995 TIME: 7:30 P.M. � . I ' PLACE: COMMUNITY CENTER 625 SOUTH PICO SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA 1.0 CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Prayer of Invocation - Pastor Bob Ferguson Pledge of Allegiance • 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 2.1 Life Saving Award - Officer James Cooper 2.2 Pollution Prevention Week - (Judy Lankev, EMWD) Villa - ). r-ede.i tc ,.1 rf 3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS v.i.t.t Wet-4't''b° 'p./".RI.'114 "4" 6N •4 -No Cv Mc, ,.,, 1,4y1t- - ;,,1,,.:► tit., ._ Any person may address the Council on any subject pertaining to city business not listed on the agenda, during this portion of the meeting. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the Council. 4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion by the City Council in the form listed. • 1 There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless • members of the City Council, staff or the public requests specified items to be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come forward, upon invitation of the Mayor, state their name, address and the Consent Calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. Convene the Redevelopment Agency in joint session with the City Council for consideration of the following: 5.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting - July 18, 1995 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 18, 1995, as presented. 5.2 Minutes of Regular Meeting - August 1 , 1995 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 1 , 1995, as presented. 5.3 Minutes of Special Meeting - August 2, 1995 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of August 2, 1995, as presented. • 5.4 Minutes of Special Meeting - August 9, 1995 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of August 9, 1995, as presented. 5.5 Minutes of Regular Meeting of August 15, 1995 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 15, 1995, as presented. 5.6 Minutes of Special Meeting of August 30, 1995 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of August 30, 1995, as presented. 5.7 Warrant Register RECOMMENDATION: Approve warrant numbers 41274 through 41379 dated September 15, 1995 in the amount of $499.912.60 and Payroll check numbers 5845 through 5933 dated August 18, 1995. 5.8 Declaration of Surplus Property RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. declaring certain property as surplus and authorizing the disposal of said property. 2 • RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DECLARING CERTAIN PROPERTY AS SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING DISPOSAL OF SAID PROPERTY 5.9 Adoption of Ordinance - Change of Zone 1-95 Location: West Side of State Street, and North of Community College Drive RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Ordinance No. 1013 approving Change of Zone 1-95 pertaining to a 6.71 acre parcel located on the west side of State Street and North of Community College Drive. ORDINANCE NO. 1013 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 1-95 THEREBY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO PERTAINING TO A 6.71 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF STATE STREET, AND NORTH OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE DRIVE • 5.10 Notice of Completion - Soboba Road Improvements Location: Soboba Village IV RECOMMENDATION: Accept the improvements installed under the Soboba Village IV Public Improvement Project by Nottson Construction. 5.11 Award of Bid - Lake Park Drive Cutoff Walls RECOMMENDATION: Award the bid for the construction of the Lake Park Drive Cut-off Walls to Nottson Construction, for a low bid of $71,521.00. 5.12 San Jacinto Avenue and Third Street Redevelopment Housing Project - Amendment No. 1 to the Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) between the Redevelopment Agency and Kenneth Mark Johnson RECOMMENDATION: Acting in the capacity of the Redevelopment Agency amend the DDA between the Redevelopment Agency and Kenneth Mark Johnson to decrease the construction budget from $65,933.23 to $65,116.23; and approve a grant in the amount of $4,175 per unit, for the first two units, to Kenneth Mark Johnson for rough grading, soils tests, surveying and staking. S 3 END OF CONSENT CALENDAR • Motion by: Seconded by: to approve consent calendar items 5.1 through 5.12 and adopt Ordinance No. 1013 and Resolution No. 95- _ 6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS \,.,A 1,;; ADVERTISED - Environmental Impact Assessment and Vesting Tentative �\ Tract Map 28224 Planned Unit Development 1-95 - Hults • ;\ ,o Applicant: National Preferred Holding RECOMMENDATION: Approve Vesting Tentative Tract 28224 and the corresponding Development Play\subject to the Finding of Fact and Conditions of Approval. UNADVERTISED - Ordinance Amending Ordinance 975 and 976 Eliminating the Requirement for Fire Sprinklers in Single Family }0 D Residences Located within Approximately One and One-Half Mile Radius k•' 0„- from a Fire Station - McNabb RECOMMENDATION: Waive the reading in full, read by title only and �S { '7 Introduce (First Reading) Ordinance No. amending Ordinance 975 and P(5 Oc Ordinance 976 Pertaining to the Installation of Fire Sprinklers in all Occupancies Outside of a Designated Area. • • ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE 975 AND ORDINANCE 975 PERTAINING TO THE INSTALLATION OF FIRE SPRINKLERS IN ALL OCCUPANCIES OUTSIDE OF A DESIGNATED AREA 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 7.1 Measure "A" Project Sequencing - Evans RECOMMENDATION: Review and comment on "Proposed Measure "A" Project Sequencing" list provided by the Riverside County Transportation Commission. 7.2 Adoption of 1995-96 Redevelopment Agency and City Budgets - Herrera RECOMMENDATION: Acting in the capacity of the Redevelopment Agency adopt Resolution No. RDA adopting the Redevelopment Agency Budget for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 1995 and ending June 30, 1996; acting in the capacity of the City Council adopt Resolution No. 95- adopting the Budget for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1 , 1995 and ending June 30, 1996. • • RESOLUTION NO. RDA A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ACTING IN THEIR CAPACITY AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1995 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1996 RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1995 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1996 7.3 Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 1995-96 - Herrera RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 95- establishing the Fiscal Year 1995-96 appropriation limit. RESOLUTION NO. 95- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SPENDING LIMITATION FOR • FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 7.4 Utility User's Tax - McNabb/Herrera/Holmes/Butler RECOMMENDATION: Receive for information and provide direction to staff, as appropriate. Adjourn the Redevelopment Agency and continue acting in the capacity of the City Council for the remainder of the agenda. 8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS 8.1 Update on Citizens Public Safety Committee 9.0 CLOSED SESSION 9.1 Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 Negotiator: Richard Kreisler, Pam Easter, Rod Butler, John Herrera Regarding: San Jacinto Police Officers' Association, San Jacinto Firefighters' Association, Public Employees of Riverside County (PERC) and Management/Confidential • 5 9.2 Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation, City of San Jacinto • vs. Delinquent Property Owners (CFD#2) pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 9.3 Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation, significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9: 3 potential cases 10.0 ADJOURNMENT Motion by: Seconded: Action: to adjourn. Vote: I, Bob Wilson, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that I caused to be posted the foregoing agenda this 14th day of September, 1995, as required by law. (- eputy City Clerk - ', \ III • 6 S A N_ JACINTO PROCLAMATION Pollution Prevention Week September 18-24, 1995 WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto is in favor of a clean and safe environment; and WIIRAS, pollution prevention focuses on waste prevention and is, therefore, the most favorable and progressive strategy for protecting our environment; and WHEREAS, pollution prevention can increase efficiency and save businesses IDmoney; and WHEREAS, pollution prevention offers both environmental protection and increased competitiveness; and WHEREAS, by focusing attention on pollution prevention, the City of San Jacinto will meet the challenges of the 90's for economic competitiveness and environmental protection; and WHEREAS, Pollution Prevention Week is an opportunity for government, industry, and citizens to work together to plan for a prosperous and sustainable future; NOW, THEREFORE, be it proclaimed that September 18 - 24, 1995 is Pollution Prevention Week and the City of San Jacinto does hereby urge all citizens and businesses of San Jacinto to 'cipate in local and regional celebrator and educational activities. vid B. for Mayor S September 7, 1995 City of San Jacinto • 201 East Main Street • San Jacinto.California 92583 909/487-7330 • FAX 909/654-9896 Printed on Recycled Paper S A N Staff Report 1 JAC1NTCJI TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk Via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: September 19, 1995 RE: Minutes of Regular Meeting - July 18, 1995 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 18, 1995, as presented. • • . MINUTES SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY J U LY 18, 1995 1.0 CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 7:25 P.M. by Mayor Solorio in the Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, California. Present: Councilmembers Leahy, Oaks, Williams and Mayor Solorio Absent: Council Seat Vacant Prayer of Invocation by Pastor Louis Arroyo Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Solorio Moment of Silence in Honor of Kenson Nishino 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS • 2.1 Employee Service Awards - (5 Years) Mayor Solorio made presentations to Pamela Easter and Jolene Shaw 2.2 California Highway Patrol 10851 Awards Presentations were made by Sandra Redding and Dave Stuflick representing the CHP and Rick Gaches of the Auto Club: Senior Officer Curtis Curtiss Senior Officer Glenn Stotz Senior Officer Mike Lynn Senior Officer Bryan Vig Officer Julian Pollitt Officer James Waters The officers actions to recover stolen vehicles was credited for the dollars savings for losses, as well as, keeping insurance rates down. 2.3 Proclamation - National Night Out August 1, 1995 Presentation by Councilmember Williams • July 18, 1995 • 3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS Steven Silcox voiced concern regarding the parking area of the New Beginnings tract models, at Roanoke and Kirby, which was lacking in maintenance. Suggested the City arrange to utilize the area for day use, with sand or grass for picnic/park use. If that was not possible, felt the property owner should maintain the property. Supportive of recycling and urged that flyers be sent to advise more citizens of the proper use of the containers. City Manager Easter advised that flyers had been distributed, in a form which contained a pull out reference card. Community Development Director McNabb, in response to Council, thought the lot belonged to Forecast. Ms. Easter advised that staff would be meeting with the City of Hemet on recycling and would schedule an update for the meeting of August 1, 1995. Suggestion was made that a larger sticker might be placed on the container. Ms. Easter advised alternatives for the lot would be discussed and brought back to Council at the meeting of August 15, 1995. Les Roulett voiced concern, on behalf of residents on Jessica Way. Advised of • the empty house in need of maintenance and watering. Noted the lawn had been mowed, but still lacked watering. A bank official indicated to him the City could get the owner to irrigate and would like that done. Regarding the recycling, advised the stickers would not remain adhered to the container, and the green waste sticker needed to be larger. Mayor Solorio advised that staff had contacted the owner, who immediately sent a maintenance crew and stated they planned to turn on the water, but it had fallen through escrow. Staff would continue to follow up. Wayne Stanis identified the City of San Jacinto as cooperative with disabled access but noted the parking at the Community Center was not in compliance, in spite of the recent improvements. Pointed out the cost to retrofit when not done right from the beginning. The other minor issues were the door stop at the meeting room entrance, which was a hazard to all, and the outside door. Noted that under ADA, outside doors were to have no more than 8.5 pounds of pressure and inside doors 5 pounds. Suggested the hardware be obtained to bring the doors in compliance and be repaired. Gave some history on the ADA regulations and their creation based on California Codes. The regulations were not new and urged City compliance. • 2 July 18, 1995 Mayor Solorio advised there were costs to contend with, but the matter would not be swept under the carpet. Senior Planner Hults advised there were plans to install automatic doors with CDBG funds, which was bid and re-advertised. The parking was not complete, the ramp would be saw cut and replaced, parking stalls were too steep and would be flattened during a future repaving process. As for the door stop, they were awaiting a building inspection to determine if it were a fire door and whether the stop could be removed. Mr. Stanis indicated the codes specified the time frame for compliance and urged that compliance be in a reasonable time frame, pursuant to Government Code Section 4450. Compliance would benefit the entire community. At the hour of 8:07 P.M. convened the Redevelopment Agency in joint session with the City Council for consideration of the following item: 4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 4.1 Contract Amendment Jordan/Shaver Apartment Conversion Architectural Design (Herron & Rumansoff) Senior Planner Hults made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. In response to Council inquiry, advised they anticipated an RFP the first of September. A MOTION was made by Agency Member Leahy, seconded by Agency Member Oaks, acting in their capacity as the Redevelopment Agency, to authorize an additional $1,700.00 for architectural services necessary to convert five dilapidated apartments into three detached single-family dwellings, for a revised contract amount not to exceed $13,100.00. Motion carried on a 3-1 vote with Agency Member Williams dissenting and one Agency Member seat vacant. At the hour of 8:10 P.M. adjourned the Redevelopment Agency and continued acting in the capacity as the City Council for the remainder of the agenda. 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember Oaks, to approve the consent calendar as presented and amended. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with one Council seat vacant. 3 July 18, 1995 • 5.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 6, 1995 Approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 6, 1995, as presented. 5.2 Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 20, 1995 Approved the amended Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 20, 1995, as presented. City Manager Easter noted the amendment to the minutes as submitted to Council, regarding comments by Mr. Oaks. 5.3 Warrant Register Approved warrant numbers 40829 through 40942, dated July 15, 1995, in the amount of $384,569.21 and Payroll check numbers 5488 through 5579 dated June 23, 1995. 5.4 Claim - Patrick Perez - JS 95-20 Rejected the claim as presented pursuant to Government Code Section 913 as recommended by the claims adjustor. 5.5 Award of Bid - Water Line Replacement • Awarded the bid for the Water Line Replacement Project to David T. Wasden, Inc. of Corona, for $88,829.75, subject to approval by the Riverside County Economic Development Agency. 5.6 Amicus Participation - Employee Drug Testing RECOMMENDATION: Approve participation of the City of San Jacinto in the matter of Loder v. City of Glendale. Councilmember Leahy felt when cities made all the effort to support drug free work places and then had to defend actions against drug testing, was a waste of time and money. Councilmember Williams agreed, and noted it was not even a City Employee, but rather, it was a city resident. The ACLU was supporting the action and bringing the matter forward. 5.7 Surplus Property Procurement Programs Adopted Resolution No. 95-35 permitting the City of San Jacinto to participate in State surplus property procurement program, and Resolution No. 95-36 permitting the City of San Jacinto to participate in the Federal Surplus Property Program. . 4 1 • July 18, 1995 RESOLUTION NO. 95-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO AUTHORIZING THE PARTICIPATION OF THE SAN JACINTO POLICE DEPARTMENT IN THE CALIFORNIA COUNTER DRUG PROCUREMENT PROGRAM OF FEDERAL PROPERTY RESOLUTION NO. 95-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO PERMITTING THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO TO PARTICIPATE IN THE FEDERAL SURPLUS PROPERTY PROGRAM Councilmember Leahy felt it would be beneficial to add the additional positions, and Council agreed, to add the Assistant to the City Manager and the Finance Director, by title. 6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 6.1 UNADVERTISED - Regulation - Ice Cream Trucks Police Chief Holmes made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. In response to Council inquiries, advised staff had not spoken with vendors on the matter. As for those vendors on bicycles, they would be addressed in another ordinance. Exhibit B (vehicle diagram) would be cleaned up for the final draft. Councilmember Leahy suggested that "motor vehicle" be more consistently used in the text. Mayor Solorio opened the public hearing. Jim Smedley inquired if the distance of hearing vendors could be addressed. Chief Holmes advised they could not. Kelly Romano inquired if the vehicle color was regulated? City Manager Easter noted that on page 8, section 13 (a), vehicles were to be white. • 5 July 18, 1995 • Chief Holmes, in response to Council, advised they planned to send letters to vendors, and provide handouts. Additionally, when each vendor applied for a business license they would be directed to the Police Department and advised of the regulations. With that process all legal vendors would be advised. There being no further speakers wishing to present testimony, Mayor Solorio closed the public hearing. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Oaks, seconded by Councilmember Leahy, to waive the reading in full and read by title only and introduce Ordinance No. 1011 establishing regulations governing the operation and retail sale of ice cream, confections, and other frozen dessert products from motor vehicles. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with one Council seat vacant. ORDINANCE NO. 1011 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE OPERATION AND RETAIL SALE OF ICE CREAM, CONFECTIONS, AND OTHER FROZEN DESSERT PRODUCTS FROM MOTOR VEHICLES 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 7.1 Advance Flashing Lights - Ramona Expressway/Chase Street Public Works Director Evans made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. Also handed out a matrix of various alternatives. Costs were based on bids and guesses. In response to Council inquiries, advised if a left turn lane were installed without road widening, it would probably fail in a year or so because of thin asphalt on the shoulder. Regarding a shorter widening distance, as was the situation in other locations, could not speculate on the liabilities. City Attorney Cox advised there was a provision in the code for design immunity if approved by Council. That would provide some immunity but would require a tricky defense and was subject to a lot of exceptions. As he understood it, the other locations may not have the degree of traffic, nor the same flow of traffic. He assumed the traffic engineer took all those issues into consideration. • 1 • July 18, 1995 Community Development Director McNabb advised other locations, improved privately, did not come under prevailing wage law, accounting for the cost difference, nor did they have to meet structural requirements. Council felt long term solutions could be accomplished in 3-4 years and the city needed to provide some temporary relief at a reasonable cost. Mr. Cox advised he could research the design immunity law and if there could be a reduction in the traffic engineer standard, to get the most immunity possible, based on the use of the laws. Mr. Evans offered to return to the traffic engineer to see if he would be willing to rethink his recommendations, in light of the other locations. Councilmember Oaks recommended the matter be tabled for further research. Mayor Solorio felt a small expenditure to extend the life of the temporary road widening would be beneficial. 4111 Mr. Evans, in response to Council inquiry on botts dots, advised they would get attention, but concerned motorists would not know what it was for. No law said it could not be done, but it would provide no more protection than the motorists behind, looking for something after hitting the dots. COUNCIL CONSENSUS to continue the matter to August 1 , 1995 meeting to allow staff to bring back information concerning the existing road shoulder and for the City Attorney to research the liabilities. Motion carried on a 3-0-1, with Councilmember Leahy abstaining due to a possible conflict of interest, and one Council seat vacant. 7.2 Vector Control Services - Northwest Mosquito and Vector Control District Community Development Director McNabb made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. The proposal would not be effective until 1996/97 and involve a $6-7 parcel charge. The process would be the same as that of NPDES. The proposal would also cover killer bees and the City would have a seat on the board. Without the coverage, the City would have to utilize pest control services. In response to Council, advised there were 9,034 parcels within the City. Was unable to locate any requirement to provide the service. • 7 July 18, 1995 Council feeling this was a matter of passing responsibility to the City and acquisition of tax money to balance the budget and it would allow for additional increases on the tax payers of San Jacinto. COUNCIL CONSENSUS to gracefully decline the offer. 7.3 Police Department Staffing Update Chief of Police Holmes explained in detail the status of staffing levels in light of the injured officers. The ne t result was a reduction in the SCAT detail, reassignment of administrative supervision personnel, delay in criminal investigation and increased overtime. In response to Council inquiries, advised that in order to hire reserves they would have to be level one, there would have to be budgeted funding, and still the down side would be the time to train them. If funding were available, depending on the length to time available, they could pay overtime, people could be hired, but it would be difficult to contract with officers elsewhere, and whom ever it was, would have to complete the basic academy. City Manager Easter, responding to Council inquiries, advised a user fee would take 45 day noticing before an action could be taken, and if passed, 41111 would be effective immediately. During that time Council would have to decide what type of utility user fee, work with the utilities and implement billing. If Council gave a short time line, staff would have to go under the supposition of what they had to work on and report back. Councilmember Oaks felt anything like that would have to sunset, there would have to be an election to see if the people wanted it for police protection, and something was needed to cover the period of time until the people decided. Mr. Holmes, in response to Council, advised they had been working for three years to expand the reserves. The problem was that once they had the appropriate experience and all the necessary field training, they would leave for jobs. The training was lengthy plus the 20-30 hours monthly, before being fully qualified. They already had explorers and volunteers performing non-essential functions, but qualified staff was still needed for other functions. Ms. Easter, based on Council comments, advised staff could look at other revenue sources and see what payroll obligations there were. 8 • July 18, 1995 Mr. Holmes, responding to suggestion of utilizing other agencies to assist, i.e, CHP for patrol services, advised staff would be looking at INCA and ARCNET task force, if funding permitted. Thought they may be pulling back one day a week for violence suppression. Other agencies could be utilized for a specific function and not just taking over patrol. There were still some questions regarding the period of time the injured officers would be out. Clarified the length of time for a temporary fix, would still be as long as it would take to go to a vote of the people. It would take 45 days to do anything. It was a minimum of three months to hire and three months to train. It might be an advantage to begin, if a tax were passed in March, but that would be to their advantage, not the City's. Felt they were being proactive in dealing with the situation. If Council considered a temporary user fee, because of what they described, probably the alternative of other agencies and utilizing overtime would be the best alternative. Staff could bring back any other funding sources for consideration. 7.4 Public Safety Finance Alternatives, Citizens Committee Community Development Director McNabb made a presentation as +� contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. In response to Council inquiries, advised that Police and Fire representatives would be providing information to the committee, but not be actual members of the committee. City Manager Easter advised the committee would be fairly staff intensive and would have a variety of staff support. Employee representatives were not included, but staff would take the direction given by Council. Councilmember Leahy preferred not to be concerned with local government background criteria, feeling if an individual could read and understand, that anything more was too restrictive. Anyone willing to listen and had intelligence, could help come to some conclusions on public safety service levels. Mayor Solorio agreed to a certain extent. Noted it also mentioned the Council should ascertain the ability of the person to comprehend, and when making the selection that they have an understanding of the issues. Thought it should not be eliminated as criteria, just left to be clarified. Did not feel, with the timing of the election, that candidates for office should not be selected because of the amount of time required for both. 9 July 18, 1995 Mr. Oaks agreed. Councilmember Williams felt that qualifications were not a priority, and that any taxpayer should have an equal opportunity and not be excluded, including City Council candidates. Felt Council would have to weigh all equally and did not agree to exclusions. Mr. Oaks indicated he hoped by November to have a solution to financing public safety. Ms. Leahy thought it would be detrimental to restrict membership to those not running for office. If they were running, they were interested enough. Mr. Williams suggested utilizing an application similar to that of the Planning Commission. The subcommittee could narrow the field and bring a recommendation, because time was of the essence. Ms. Leahy felt there was no need to reinvent the wheel, and staff shold utilize the Planning Commission application. Mr. Oaks desired implementation as soon as possible. • Mr. Williams desired the time frame be shortened and staff move forward quickly. Ms. Easter clarified the direction of Council was to outreach if they did not receive applications within the designated categories, but did not have to stick to that list solely, that being the list on page 3 of the staff report. The committee could even be 8-11 members if the goal was not met. The important thing was the time line and if there were gaps, staff would work with the subcommittee. COUNCIL CONSENSUS the subcommittee would be Councilmember Williams and Mayor Solorio. City Manager Easter advised of the petition from American village regarding the odors from fertilizer, and suggested it be referred to the Agriculture Advisory Committee, when formed. Council agreed that would be appropriate. • to • July 18, 1995 8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS 8.1 Potential Cancellation of August 22, 1995 Study Session COUNCIL CONSENSUS to cancel. 8.2 Formation Council Subcommittee - Realignment of Highway 79 Advised that Mr. Oaks was already representing the City as the appropriate subcommittee, along with other staff, and they would be attending the meeting next Friday. Ms. Leahy gave recognition to Child Care and urged others to appear and receive certificates of appreciation. Regarding the Museum Board, was sad to report a lack of complete background, but Council was committed to appoint members to the board, which had not been done. Felt it should be agendized as soon as possible because all who were serving had expired terms of office. Noted the activities of the next day regarding the Virginia Lee Hotel. • Mayor Solorio felt the Museum Board needed to be discussed during the budget process, and would not want to short change anyone if an alternate route were taken, but that was unknown until the budget was complete. Ms. Easter suggested calendaring the Museum Board for August 15, 1995, one week following budget adoption, noting there were also some positions on the Beautification Committee. Mr. Oaks would be out of town, and Council agreed to postpone the committee issues until September 5, 1995. Mr. McNabb advised he felt the Museum Board was formed by Ordinance in 1939. Mr. Oaks reporting on WRCOG, advised there was no quorum on the Groundwater Association issue for the JPA and pumpers exclusion, and requirement to recharge the basin. The articles were approved, with the exception of EMWD, who came back with a modification which was not approved. The matter was still up in the air and not resolved. • 11 July 18, 1995 Mr. Williams received clarification from staff regarding the two stop signs at Cottonwood. Regarding the Library issue, he would like to see in the next couple months, a proposal by staff, rather than revenues going to the County and hours being cut, to look at alternatives involving the school district and/or college. Council agreed that staff schedule the matter for the September study session, and invite the Superintendent and Board of Trustee President. Mr. Williams requested that NPDES be revisited, in light of current talks with Congress and the legislation to relax the rules. Even if not rescinded, would like to rescind the taxing of residents for an unfunded mandate. Ms. Easter advised staff would try to have a representative (Brian Nestande) present in September to address the issues. Mr. Oaks commended Mr. Evans on traffic control in his neighborhood. At the hour of 9:45 P.M. Council recessed At the hour of 10:00 P.M. Council reconvened, with all members present, except one 4111 Council seat vacant, for closed session pursuant to the following: 9.0 CLOSED SESSION 9.1 Conference with Real Property Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: Superblock Negotiating Parties:Wolf, Lamsen Under Negotiation: Price and terms. 9.2 Conference with Labor Negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency Negotiator: Cox, Kreisler Employee Organization: San Jacinto Police Officers Association, San Jacinto Firefighters Association, Public Employees of Riverside County (PERC), and Management/Confidential 9.3 Public Employee Performance Evaluation pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 (Continued from 7/5/95) Title: City Manager 12 • July 18, 1995 10.0 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned. The hour of adjournment being 11:30 P.M. Approved David Solorio, Mayor Submitted by Bob Wilson, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk 13 S A N Staff Report TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk Via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: September 19, 1995 RE: Minutes of Regular Meeting - August 1, 1995 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 1 , 1995, as presented. • • MINUTES • SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY AUGUST 1, 1995 1.0 CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 7:40 P.M. by Mayor Solorio in the Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, California. Present: Councilmembers Leahy, Oaks, Williams and Mayor Solorio Prayer of Invocation by Chaplain Cooper Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Solorio 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 2.1 Employee Service Awards - (10 Years) 411 Dennis Warner was not present 2.2 Employee of the 2nd Quarter of 1995 Mayor Solorio made a posthumous presentation to the wife and children of Kenson Nishino. 3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS Virgal Woolfolk spoke regarding an article in the Hemet News, and stated there was no political basis for his meeting with the City Manager. Rather, he had inquired what he could do to assist with the police shortages. He had the idea that the churches could get more involved and adopt an area to help meet the financial woes and be more involved, like a volunteer program. The conversation was entirely positive and he felt the article was malicious and lacked facts. He requested an apology on behalf of the City. Jim Smedley indicated he wished to speak later on five different items. At the hour of 7:50 P.M. convened the Redevelopment Agency in joint session with the City Council for consideration of the following item: • 1 August 1, 1995 • M AG ENCY REDEVELOPMENT 4.1 Construction Loan Payoff Courtside Classics (Brown Street) Senior Planner Hults made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. Provided a handout containing an amendment to the original report, showing Section 9 of the Construction Loan Agreement amended as follows: "The default by developer in any term of this agreement shall be a further basis to authorize the Agency to terminate the DDA pursuant to Article 6 of the DDA. Nothing in this Section shall be construed to limit the Agency's authority to enforce the Agency Trust Deed through any available legal recourse, including, but not limited to, judicial or non-judicial foreclosure." Mr. Hults, responding to Council inquiries, advised there were two homes left. Clarified that funding was from RDA funds, and that Bank of Hemet was part of the original financing and had not renewed, two homes had been sold. two were on the market, and there were no escrows pending. When the two remaining units were sold, about $77,900 would come back to the RDA. As for profits for A.A. Chamberlain, those had been used because of the extended period of time. Community Development Director McNabb explained that Chamberlain received funds on the homes already built and the balance of the loans, about $135,000, and a small amount of money left to draw from, would be used to complete the remaining homes, and there was an incentive for Chamberlain to complete the work. Clarified there were originally eight homes planned, but with the Bank of Hemet not renewing, the amount of funding was reduced in half. The down payment was supported by RDA funds, approximately $7,500 per unit, and that had to be used to close the other two units. Staff would be coming back in the future with a more aggressive plan to list the units with one real estate agent to stimulate more activity. As for the remaining vacant land, the 95/96 budget would propose a similar plan for completion of the remaining four homes. Councilmember Leahy requested, and Council agreed, to amend the contract on Page 4, to direct correspondence to the Executive Director and not the Assistant. 110 August 1, 1995 A MOTION was made by Agency Member Leahy, seconded by Agency Member Williams, acting in their capacity as the Redevelopment Agency, to authorize execution of Loan Agreement with AA Chamberlain & Associates, as amended, for construction funding in the amount of $155,800.00, for completion of the first phase, and authorize recordation of the Construction Trust Deed. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with one Agency Member seat vacant. At the hour of 8:00 P.M. adjourned the Redevelopment Agency and continued acting in the capacity as the City Council for the remainder of the agenda. 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY A MOTION was made by Councilmember Oaks, seconded by Councilmember Leahy, to approve the consent calendar as presented. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with one Council seat vacant. 5.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting of July 5, 1995 Approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 5 1995, as presented. • 5.2 Warrant Register Approved warrant numbers 40943 through 41030, dated July 21, 1995, in the amount of $524,483.09 and Payroll check numbers 5580 through 5670, dated July 7, 1995. 5.3 Adoption of Ordinance Regarding Regulations for Ice Cream Trucks Waived the reading in full and read by title only, and adopted Ordinance No. 1011 regulating ice cream trucks. ORDINANCE NO. 1011 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE OPERATION AND RETAIL SALE OF ICE CREAM, CONFECTIONS, AND OTHER FROZEN DESSERT PRODUCTS FROM MOTOR VEHICLES Staff directed to send a copy of the ordinance to the City of Corona. 5.4 Impartial Analysis for City Clerk and City Treasurer Directed staff to submit the impartial analysis to the Registrar of Voters for printing in the Sample Ballot. 3 August 1, 1995 • 5.5 Status Report on Use of School Grounds Received and filed. 6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS None 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 7.1 Update on City-to-City Recycling/Information on Public Education Outreach Assistant to the City Manager Butler made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. The report included the public information strategies, current and for the future. Regarding the container stickers, they simply ran out and more had been ordered. In some cases, because of the attractiveness, some were picked up by school children. There would be customer contact visits by recycling staff and stickers would be distributed. However, in the meantime, green waste could be set out and would be picked up without the stickers. The contacts included the drivers in the neighborhood. Personal contacts were made 4111 during the day, and if no one was home, cards were left. There was also a spanish language brochure with the containers, asking questions and seeking feed back on how the program was going. The hot line had been a success. The line was answered by Hemet staff who had received over 300 calls per week. A lot of activity was a good sign, it showed interest in participation, and participation correctly. There were few negative calls. There were some rebates of charges being worked on for those at the end of the delivery route which would be complete for the next billing the following week. The committee, two each from Hemet and San Jacinto would be meeting on August 10th for the 60 day review of the program to determine any issues and what to improve. Staff would requested comments from Council on any issues to include on the agenda. In response to Council, advised that one of the big issues to be discussed would be how to bring the commercial side up to speed on recycling. The commercial side of the issue had more variations to deal with to meet their needs. Staff would make sure to identify those not contacted, how it would be accomplished, and felt it should be no later than the end of August. The target would be the largest diversion users, particularly those with large volumes of paper. At the request of Council, staff would also remind residents they did not need to leave bins out all week. 4 • August 1, 1995 City Manager Easter clarified, at the request of Council, to calendar a review of OK Associates contract in the next 90-120 days, to consider a lower cost equation, reduced pick ups and a variable can rate. COUNCIL CONSENSUS to receive and file the report, with staff direction as indicated. 7.2 Reallocation of CDBG Funds Community Center Rehabilitation Public Works Director Evans explained the history of the project, including the bids received. Detailed the work to be accomplished and the varying costs. However, staff had been advised by the County there was funding remaining from previous projects, which could be reallocated. In response to Council inquiries, advised the contingency fund was required in the event of any hidden work that might be necessary, rather than take it out of the general fund. Any remaining funds from contingency could be reprogrammed. CDBG funds could not be used for any other city operations. Also, the automatic doors were not mandated by ADA, but was warranted because of the high senior use of the facility. Timing for completion would depend upon the public hearing requirements, but anticipated it to be 90-120 days. Stated the kitchen work would be accomplished to minimize the impact on meals served, but no actual meals were to be cooked on the premises during construction. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy to approve the bid by Rose Construction for the entire project at $49.500 and authorize the additional funding from the funds to be reallocated, and to complete the project as expediently as possible. Mayor Solorio requested clarification. A MOTION was restated by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember Oaks, to approve Rose Construction bid for the project, subject to available funding. MOTION AMENDED to include the contingency for a total of $54,500. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with one Council seat vacant. • 5 • August 1, 1995 9 A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember Oaks, to utilize the $25,000 in CDBG funds left over from previous projects for the $19,000 costs. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with one Council seat vacant. City Manager Easter advised staff would bring back the issue for reprogramming. 7.3 Commemorative Plaque Modification - Community Center City Manager Easter advised the cost estimate for name removal was about $400.00. Further, the City Attorney could find no legal precedent to support either removal or non-removal. In response to Council inquiry, advised that a payment had been received from Mr. Nam mar that very evening. Mayor Solorio inquired if Council thought it appropriate to use those funds for the request? Council Comments: • 1 . Felt it was not an appropriate thing to do and would disagree with any such action. There were better ways to spend the funds. 2. Sort of agreed not to use the funds in that manner. The City was being repaid for a portion of what was lost. Although did not like being reminded the City had been taken advantage of, it was a time to find another use for the funds. 3. Suggested the name remaining would serve as a reminder to all, of the results when one person becomes so entrenched. 7.4 Ramona Expressway/Chase St. Intersection Widening/Turn Lanes Public Works Director Evans advised that both the Traffic Engineer and City Attorney had advised to proceed in a safe and liability limiting manner. Using the overhead projector, outlined the intersection and the work proposed, including the original options and various alternatives in the meantime. Currently proposed a cost reduction of $30,000, but would still need to widen west of Chase, with a reduced turn pocket. The new proposal would still cost about $50,000, which he believed could come from regional funding for local transportation, if Council wished to pursue that. The right-of-way was available, as was the demand from citizens. 40 • August 1, 1995 Mr. Evans, in response to Council inquiries, advised the additional lane would be stressed for truck traffic. There was now a thin layer of pavement over the soil, and the proposal would include digging down 60 inches to put in a structural section with base material and 5-6 inches of asphalt. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Oaks, seconded by Mayor Solorio to approve plans and specifications for the Widening of Ramona Expressway at Chase Street and the Installation of Left Turn Pockets and authorize staff to advertise for bids. Motion carried on a 2-1-1 vote with Councilmember Williams dissenting, Councilmember Leahy abstaining for a conflict of interest, and one Council seat vacant. City Attorney Cox clarified that the vote was a passing one. Councilmember Williams stated his position was in regard to the liability and obligation of the City not voting for the full $80,000 in improvements, and not making it a 100% typical road standard. He did not feel $50,000 would provide any more traffic safety. The issue was drivers on the road • and the need to slow cars, provide relief in the interim without affecting the design of the road at the present time. That was why he voted no. 7.5 Forecast Homes - Mini Park Public Works Director Evans advised the owner was willing to allow the vacant land for park use, so long as they would be able to restore the area to a buildable state when they were ready. All options, other than the neighbors creating what they wanted, would cost the city. Staff could not support another maintenance task and recommended the neighbors do something. Councilmember Oaks was opposed to spending City funds and suggested this would be an opportunity for Mr. Woolfolk and his people. Councilmember Williams did not support spending City funds and suggested staff contact Mr. Silcox and provide some assistance in the right direction, to utilize volunteer time and that staff follow up. City Manager Easter advised that if Council directed, staff could follow up with Mr. Silcox and share a copy of the staff report and an offer of support. • 7 August 1, 1995 Councilmember Leahy felt that Forecast would benefit by having something other than weeds and felt it was important to encourage the people to do something there. Could not see the City spending funds, including the cost of maintenance, and then have to return the area to a buildable state. 7.6 Ballot Measure Arguments for City Clerk and City Treasurer City Manager Easter made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember Oaks, to approve with the exception of the last two sentences of the City Clerk argument, which were to be stricken. Motion carried on a 3-1 vote with Councilmember Williams dissenting and one Council seat vacant. Staff to draft a press release encouraging people to run and informing the public that the measures were on the ballot. 7.7 CDF Contract - Fire Protection Services Fire Chief Price made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. Clarified the matter had been under consideration for the past two years, and referred all to the contract language addressing the various issues. Felt staff would come back with more on the procedures for replacing equipment and how to fund it. Explained the activity of the station resulted in a reduction in years of life for equipment. The City would also be tied to the county cost for maintenance, and especially when replacing major components. City Manager Easter stated Station 25 would remain in San Jacinto. Mr. Price clarified for Council that Bob Wilson would administer the contract, under the City Manager. Information packets had been provided to employees on the contract work until the final contract was in place. Outlined the entire program and advised the term of the contract would be as mutually agreed and could be modified at any time. Staff had been assured by other contract cities, they still felt it was a community fire department and the County would encourage personnel to do so, and carry out the wishes of the City, hence there would be no lost identity. 8 • August 1 , 1995 The proposal would re-institute the volunteer program, which the County had the resources for. The proposal was strictly for monetary reasons. This would provide the necessary resources to cope with the existing conditions. City Attorney Cox stated he approved the agreement, but asked that Exhibit A clearly identify that the costs for the initial term of the contract were "annualized", meaning the City would actually pay about 8/12ths for the first year. Council commended staff for all their work on the proposal. Jim Smedley felt this was probably one of the most important decisions for Council in years and he felt there should be five Councilmembers making the vote. Further, when the terms of office were up for those voting, they would no longer be responsible for the decision. Requested Council wait a few months and let the new full Council decide. Councilmember Leahy noted it was a matter of public safety, and • although she agreed they should have a five member Council, they had four and only three votes were needed to approve. Noted the proposal would provide more resources for training and citizen response, which would benefit everyone. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Oaks, seconded by Councilmember Leahy, to adopt Resolution No. 37 and approve the contract with the County of Riverside to provide the City with Fire Suppression services at an anticipated 1995/96 cost of $823,038.00, with the amendment to Exhibit A for annualized cost. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with one Council seat vacant. RESOLUTION NO. 95-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AND CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION TO PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION, FIRE PREVENTION, RESCUE, AND MEDICAL AID SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN SAID AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY 9 August 1 , 1995 7.8 Potential Tax Rate for Community Facilities District 4 Community Development Director McNabb made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. In response to Council inquiries, advised the purpose of the existing district was to mitigate impacts of new development on police and fire, some for personnel, equipment and a small amount to amortize the cost of capital equipment, but nothing for fire staff, and auxiliary services such as police detectives, dispatch and clerical. Council Comments: 1 . Thought Council needed to revisit the 1.3 per 1,000 ratio and determine what was affordable. It was an ideal figure, but perhaps beyond the City's means. The extra cost per family on new homes would be a hard hit. Encouraged citizens to become involved and join the committee. 2. Appreciated the staff work and pointed out the City was doing what should have been done long ago, and did not feel it was an exorbitant cost to provide the public with the expected level of service. Funding levels currently did not meet the needs, and to do less would be to continue in a backward direction. A comprehensive financing mechanism was needed before new development started coming on line. Would prefer to go to a vote of the people to determine the level of service, but there was no grass roots effort. A few continued to support the burden for which the vast majority did not equally support financially. 3. The staff analysis was an excellent tool for the Public Safety Financing Committee to work with and come up with a reasonable figure. 4. Noted the favorable audience present for the issue, the best in some time. Felt a mechanism was needed so that the few financially supporting the services for an entire community did not carry the entire burden, while another 8,000 did not contribute. Mayor Solorio called for speakers on the issue: Jim Smedley felt what they were proposing was a city wide Mello Roos which would discourage development in the area. Felt that such an action, in a depressed economy, would further impact the community. 4111/ 10 August 1, 1995 t II • Ken Brass, representing Mountain View Homeowners, felt that even those not paying the additional CFD funds, did provide support through their property taxes. However, agreed it needed to be a fair and equitable share of cost, since they all shared equally in the benefit. Councilmember Williams clarified that the proposal for a CFD #4 would only include new development and would not include any existing. He agreed it needed to be shared equally in the community and would support an assessment on that basis and eliminate the other districts, which grow annually based on the CPI, and would continue to do so into eternity, with a large portion of the community not sharing in the cost. There was a need to balance a safe and secure environment which builders would want to develop in. Advised Council would be looking at an interim solution by asking for assistance from the CHP because of the lack of resources. Mayor Solorio invited Mr. Brass to join the committee, as well as anyone else interested. 7.9 Special District Tax Rates - Fiscal Year 1995/96 7.9.1 Annual Special Taxes - Assessment District 87-1 7.9.2 Annual Special Taxes - Assessment District 94-1 • 7.9.3 Annual Special Taxes - CFD #1 7.9.4 Annual Special Taxes - CEO #2 7.9.5 Annual Special Taxes - CFD #3 Community Development Director McNabb made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. Government Finance Group Representatives gave a basic overview and update on the status of the districts, with an additional handout. Explained that District 87-1 had an 80% delinquency rate and the reserve fund had been depleted. In response to Council, advised the foreclosures owing would be added to the 95/96 fiscal year. In addition, the delinquency would not be an obligation of the City's General Funds, nor would the City in any way be obligated to pay the bond holders. Was uncertain on the affect of bond rating. On the 94-1 district, if delinquencies went higher, the City could initiate foreclosure, but staff had been corresponding to obtain payment and there were reserves available, and again, no City liability. Clarified the Golf Course was part of the 94-1 district, but was not assessed for public safety. The CFD's were on Rancho San Jacinto. Foreclosures had already begun. The vacant land rate was high and figures could be provided if desired. • 11 August 1, 1995 • was taxed at the maximum, % Although property it could not exceed the 2 cap, and foreclosures would not create any more liability on the current homeowners. Community Development Director McNabb stated that the long term effect would be ultimately the reserve would have to be replenished and the maximum would continue until it had been replenished. Government Finance Group Representative explained that if the land continued undeveloped and the reserve depleted, funds from the foreclosure could be used to pay the taxes, but the interest on the foreclosure was higher than the bonds. Without a sale, the cost could not escalate to the situation like district 87-1 , but there would be insufficient funds for the bond holder, and City finances would not be impacted. Mayor Solorio called for speakers: Jim Smedley again was protesting a tax increase and reminded Council of the language in the documents creating the district, which did not give the City a mandate to increase it to the maximum each year. He understood what the consultants were saying with the reserve funds, and he was not suggesting it was not valid, but there was a situation where the CPI was down. Government Finance Group Representative indicated the CPI went up 2.3% and the construction index went down 3%. Was not sure if the increase was permissive, but under the circumstances the money was needed to levy and pay for the bonds, annual costs, expenses, consultants, etc. Jim Conner was most concerned about where the bonds were, and not what might happen in 2-3 years. The current revenue stream appeared to be $.5 million in surplus, and with the reserve $2.6 million. Did not understand a 80% delinquency rate, and with the assessment going from 2.1 to 3.3 they would fall short by $30 million. Wanted someone to explain what was being done currently to stop it? 12 • August 1 , 1995 Government Finance Group Representative explained the City was pursuing the foreclosures, 192 parcels, and could recover funds to put back in the reserve and pay the taxes. The 94/95 debt service was $2.1 million and essentially the City collected $500,000. Therefore, the interest made in March and again in September, funds were not collected and reserves had to be used, and would be used, to pay the debt service. Therefore, even though $2.1 million would be drawn down, there was the distinct possibility there would be no reserve in a couple years, but may recoup $209,000 in delinquent installments and the City was working with a potential purchaser. The worst case scenario could be the surplus could become depleted and the foreclosure be unfruitful. the land could not be sold or generate any funds, and there would not be enough to pay the bond holders and they would declare a default against the property owners. If there were no bidders on the property, the City could take it over and pay the bond holders. Clarified the bond holders could only go after the delinquent parcels. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember Oaks, to adopt Resolutions 95-38 through Resolution 95- 411 42, establishing the annual special taxes for Community Facilities District No. 1,2,3 and Assessment District Nos. 87-1 and 94-1. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with one Council seat vacant. RESOLUTION NO. 95-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 87-1 ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 RESOLUTION NO. 95-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-1 ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 • 13 • August 1, 1995 RESOLUTION NO. 95-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITIESDISTRICT NO. 1 ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND POLICE/FIRE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 RESOLUTION NO. 95-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND POLICE/FIRE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 RESOLUTION 95-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO 4111/ COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND POLICE/FIRE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 7.10 Update on Community Center and ADA Compliance Senior Planner Hults made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. Councilmember Leahy noted that San Jacinto was at the forefront of compliance with ADA. Mayor Solorio thanked staff for the report. Noted that Wayne was not present, and had already left. However, he represented a lot of people and was happy with the report. • 14 • August 1 , 1995 8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS Councilmember Oaks advised on the status of HR 660 and the need to write Senators to endorse it. He had a meeting regarding the routing of Highway 79. and though he was hesitant to discuss specifics, advised they agreed to a phasing plan and explained the alternative routes and the phases. Also there was agreement to complete the gap and widen the entire expressway in a joint application to RCTC to request funding. Noting of course, that not all phases were assured to be approved. There was agreement to support the effort to extend Newport Road to 215 for access to Domengoni Reservoir. Staff would work on a joint resolution and help other agencies, working in concert, on the other issues, i.e., number of lanes, setback and speed limits. They would be meeting again August 10th. Noted the RTA conference in San Diego was very informative and productive. Councilmember Leahy thanked those attending the County Child Care reception on behalf of the City. Proposed that staff have a dress down day every other Friday. Felt it would be appropriate for the City Manager to make a decision or policy, especially during the hot weather. Mayor Solorio attended an IEEP meeting, where he met the movers and shakers of business development, and was impressed. Advised there was a meeting with EMWD regarding groundwater replenishment, and a plan was on the board, but funding would have to be addressed. Stated that irrigation and drinking water would pay the same rate and reclamation could be accomplished, they just needed to determine the system for delivery. COUNCIL CONSENSUS to direct staff to draft letters in support of HR 660. At the hour of 10:40 P.M. Council recessed. At the hour of 11:00 P.M. Council reconvened to conduct closed session, pursuant to the following, with all members present, except one Council seat vacant: 9.0 CLOSED SESSION 9.1 Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 • 15 • August 1 , 1995 9.2 Conference with Real Property Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: 269 Brown Street Negotiation Parties: Chambers, Habitat for Humanity & RDA Under Negotiation: Price and terms 9.3 Conference with Legal Counsel existing Litigation (Keslar et al vs. City of San Jacinto) pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 9.4 Conference with Legal Counsel existing Litigation (PR Equities vs. City of San Jacinto CAD #2) pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 9.5 Conference with Legal Counsel existing Litigation (RT Capital/Gentra vs. City of San Jacinto CAD #2) pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 At the hour of 11:34 P.M. Council reconvened in open session, with all members present, except one Council seat vacant, and announced no reportable action being4110 taken. 10.0 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned. The hour of adjournment being 11:35 P.M. Approved by David Solorio, Mayor Submitted by Bob Wilson, City Clerk • 16 TSA N Staff Report [JACIN CS( TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Laurie Mora, Deputy City Clerk Via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: September 19, 1995 RE: Minutes of Special Meeting - August 2, 1995 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of August 2, 1995, as presented. • • MINUTES • SPECIAL MEETING/SPECIAL STUDY SESSION SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY AUGUST 2, 1995 1 .0 CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 4:08 p.m. by Mayor Solorio in the Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, California. Present: Councilmembers Leahy, Oaks, Williams and Mayor Solorio Absent: Council Seat Vacant 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS • 3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person may address the Council on any subject pertaining to city business not listed on the agenda, during this portion of the meeting. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the Council. 4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR 6.0 PUBLIC HEARING 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 7.1 Adoption of Resolution Authorizing the Chief of Police of to Enter into Agreement with California Highway Patrol (CHP) for Extra Patrol - Holmes Chief Holmes made a presentation as contained in the staff report. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember Oaks to • adopt Resolution No. 95-43 permitting the Chief of Police to enter into an agreement with the California Highway Patrol to provide extra patrol services. • RESOLUTION NO. 95-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF OF POLICE TO JOINTLY DEVELOP A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) WITH THE CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL THEREBY ESTABLISHING A PROGRAM OF GENERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE TO THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO The Special Meeting was adjourned at 4:25 P.M. The City Council then continued with the Special Study Session. 7.2 Budget Presentations 7.2.1 Public Works Fund Account Gas Tax 021 4150 Measure "A" 022 4150 Traffic Safety 024 4150 Park Development 028 7100 Parkway Development 032 7150 Underground Utilities 038 4150 Traffic Signalization 041 4155 411 Local Transportation 075 8900 Regional Transportation 076 8900 7.2.2 Community Development/Finance Assessment District 87-1 042 8501 CFD #1/Debt Service 044 8700 CFD#2/Debt Service 046 8800 Fire Mitigation 067 3200 Capital Improvement 073 8900 Carpool Mitigation 074 8900 Public Buildings 077 8900 CFD #2/Capital Fund 080 9100 Assessment District 94-1 081 9100 7.2.3 Redevelopment Soboba Project Capital Projects 091 9700 Debt Service 092 9700 Low/Mod Income Housing 094 9700 San Jacinto Project Capital Projects 096 9700 Debt Service 097 9700 Low/Mod Income Housing 099 9700 7.2.4 City Manager's Office • CDBG 029 8661 8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS 9.0 CLOSED SESSION 9.1 Public Employee Appointment pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 Title: Finance Director Approved Mayor Submitted by • Bob Wilson, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk * ,�. it ff11 • S A N Staff Report [JAC1NT OJ TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Laurie Mora, Deputy City Clerk Via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: September 19, 1995 RE: Minutes of Special Meeting - August 9, 1995 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of August 9, 1995, as presented. • • MINUTES • SPECIAL MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY AUGUST 9, 1995 1.0 CALL TO ORDER The Special Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 4:10 p.m. by Mayor Solorio in the Community Center, 625 South Pico Avenue, San Jacinto, California. Present: Councilmembers Leahy, Oaks, and Mayor Solorio Absent: Councilmember Williams The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Solorio. 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None • 3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS None 4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY None 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR None 6.0 PUBLIC HEARING None • 1 • 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 7.1 Follow-up from August 2nd Budget Session Interim Finance Director Larry Weaver made a presentation on the fund balances of various special revenue and enterprise funds. He also answered related questions from councilmembers on the status of individual funds, including the community facilities districts. City Manager Easter noted the questions that would require additional research and indicated to the City Council that those questions would be answered at future budget study sessions. Councilman Williams arrived at 5:15 p.m. 7.2 Budget Presentations Community Development Director McNabb reported on the proposed budgets for San Jacinto's two redevelopment project areas. He answered questions from councilmembers on the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund's impacts on the redevelopment agency and the status of tax increment sharing with the San Jacinto Unified School District. • Economic Development Assistant Cassel presented details on the various economic development activities that were included in the proposed budget, including the "Breakfast With Business" and business education programs, outreach to the tourism and film industries, the "Superblock" project, and the industrial development target area. The Council requested that staff return with additional information on the criteria used to select the industrial target area, before a final selection is made. Senior Planner Hults provided an overview of current housing rehabilitation and construction projects. He also described the upcoming housing activities proposed for the 1995-96 Fiscal Year. 7.3 Appointment of Adhoc Council Committee on Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) By unanimous consent, Mayor Solorio and Councilman Williams were appointed to serve as the members of the Adhoc Council Committee on the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund. • 2 ► 7.4 Scheduling of Future Budget Sessions By unanimous consent, the City Council cancelled the special budget meeting originally scheduled for Thursday, August 10 at 4:00 p.m. Additional budget study sessions were scheduled for the following dates and times: Tuesday, August 29, from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Wednesday, August 30, from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, September 5, from 4:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. Wednesday, September 6, from 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. 8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS None At the hour of 6:15 p.m., the City Council recessed. At the hour of 6:25 p.m., the City Council reconvened, with all members present, except one Council seat vacant, pursuant to the following: 9.0 CLOSED SESSION 9.1 Public Employment Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 Title: Finance Director At the hour of 6:50 p.m., the City Council reconvened in open session, with all members present, except one Council seat vacant, and announced no reportable action being taken. 10.0 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned at 6:51 p.m. Approved: David Solorio, Mayor Submitted by: Bob Wilson, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk 3 .....PP:....77. S A N Staff Report JAC�1NIT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk Via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: September 19, 1995 RE: Minutes of Regular Meeting - August 15, 1995 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 15, 1995, as presented. • MINUTES SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY AUGUST 15, 1995 1 .0 CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 7:40 P.M. by Mayor Solorio in the Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, California. Present: Councilmembers Leahy, Williams and Mayor Solorio Absent: Councilmember Oaks and Council Seat Vacant Prayer of Invocation by Pastor Gene Level Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Solorio 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS • None 3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS Stephen Rebovich lodged more complaints against his neighbors, the Gibsons, stating he was certain they were responsible for the vandalism of his property. Again, stated if the City did not take care of them, he would. Mayor Solorio directed that Mr. Rebovich speak with the Chief of Police. Mr. Rebovich stated this had been going on for years and he wanted it stopped or he would do something to stop it. 4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY None 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember Williams, to approve the consent calendar as presented. Motion carried on a 3-0 • vote with Councilmember Oaks absent and one Council seat vacant. 1 August 15, 1995 5.1 Warrant Register Approved warrant numbers 41031 through 41138, dated August 15, 1995, in the amount of $666,537.30, and Payroll check numbers 5671 through 5760, dated August 4, 1995. 5.2 Treasurer's Report - June 1995 Received and filed. 5.3 Fiscal Year 1995-96 Senior Nutrition Program Lease Agreement (Community Center) Approved the Fiscal Year 1995-96 Senior Nutrition Program lease agreement with the County of Riverside, Office on Aging. 5.4 Fiscal Year 1995-96 Title III Grant Contract for Senior Information and Assistance Service - Riverside County Office on Aging Approved the Fiscal Year 1995-96 Information and Assistance grant contract with the Riverside County Office on Aging as presented; and adopted Resolution No. 95-44 designating the person authorized to sign the Information and Assistance contract with Riverside County Office on Aging. • RESOLUTION NO. 95-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA DESIGNATING THE PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN THE FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 INFORMATION AND ASSISTANCE CONTRACT WITH THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY OFFICE ON AGING 5.5 Bid Award - Assessment District 94-1 Landscape Improvements Awarded the bid for Landscape Improvements Adjacent to Soboba Village to R. K. Allen Landscape Construction of San Bernardino in the amount of $99,776.00. 5.6 Public Utility Easement from FN Development Company Location: Easterly end of Windsong Lane in Summerchase Homes Accepted the Public Utility Easement from FN Development related to Lot 40 of Tract No. 24140-2. • 2 August 15, 1995 5.7 Right-of-Way Dedication from the San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency Location: Northeast corner of Third Street and San Jacinto Avenue Accepted the Right-of-Way dedication from the San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency. 5.8 Resolution Authorizing Commencement of Foreclosure - Community Facilities District No. 2 Adopted Resolution No. 95-45 ordering foreclosure actions and relieving the Riverside County Tax Collector of certain obligations to collect delinquent special taxes for specified parcels within CFD No. 2. RESOLUTION NO. 95-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ORDERING FORECLOSURE ACTIONS AND RELIEVING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR OF CERTAIN OBLIGATIONS TO COLLECT DELINQUENT SPECIAL TAXES FOR SPECIFIED PARCELS WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 41, City Manager Easter noted a revised Exhibit A had been provided to Council, withdrawing 14 parcels from the delinquency list. 5.9 Replacement of the Subdivision Agreement for Tract 23789 Location: Southwest Corner of Evans Street and Las Rosas Applicant: Linway Development Authorized staff to prepare a replacement Subdivision Agreement for Tract 23789; accepted replacement bonds in the amount of $297,143.00 as follows: Performance/Labor and Materials of Street Improvements - $232,336.00, Monuments - $12,000.00, Water - $32,846.00, Sewer - $32,961.00; and released existing bonds in the amount of $479,843.00, as follows: Performance/Labor and Materials of Street Improvements - $12,00.00, Water - $32,846.00, Sewer - $32,961 .00, Grading - $182,700.00. 5.10 Conditional Use Permit 2-95 (24,000 sq. ft. Skating Rink and Entertainment Center, and 14,000 sq. ft. Outdoor Skating Rink Location: 600 feet south of Esplanade Avenue, 700 feet east of San Jacinto Avenue Applicant: Fun Properties, L.L.C. Ratified CUP 2-95 subject to the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval. • 3 August 15, 1995 • Councilmember Leahy voiced excitement for the project, which was expected to be open by Spring. Bob Zambon noted that although he had not voiced objection to the project at the Planning Commission meeting, wanted it noted that American Village had recently installed security because of litter and problems with the theater. Felt the proposal would have a negative impact on small business and urged Council to consider those issues before making a decision. 5.11 GRC - Redevelopment Consultant, Inc., Contract to Amend the Redevelopment Plan Acting in their capacity as the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency awarded the contract to GRC-Redevelopment Consultants to amend the Redevelopment Plan, in an amount not to exceed $17,850, plus costs of approximately $1,000.00. 6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 6.1 (UNADVERTISED) Ordinance Regulating Traffic Speeds on City Streets Chief of Police Holmes made a presentation as contained in the staff • report on file with the City Clerk. In response to Council explained the details of how speed limits were determined, the legal requirements, and that basically the majority of drivers established what would be considered the norm. Most speed limits established were not necessarily new. What would change would be that many were not previously posted, and they would now be posted. Citizens would know of the posting by the publication of the ordinance. Public Works Director Evans clarified that the limit set was based on the speed recorded for 85% of those not exceeding legal limits, and was a very democratic process. Mayor Solorio opened the public hearing and called for speakers. Victor Breault inquired when the posted speed limit on Dillon would be enforced? Noted there were many children in the area. He understood there were some funding cut backs, but felt the apathy of the officers was un-necessary. When he contacted the City, he was given a run around. Noted also, the need for enforcement around the Hyatt School to protect the school children. • • August 15, 1995 Councilmember Leahy inquired regarding the portable sign that would advise drivers how fast they were going? Chief Holmes explained that the City had lost their volunteer to take the equipment out, and that the equipment was currently being repaired. Ms. Leahy suggested that when it was repaired that Mr. Breault would be willing to volunteer some help with that. Les Roulett volunteered to assist when the equipment was repaired. Councilmember Williams suggested that Mr. Breault, and any one else interested, could volunteer to serve on the Public Safety Financing Committee to resolve how to fund public safety at the level citizens expected. Chief Holmes felt that perhaps what some might see in attitude, was a frustration by Council and staff with the lack of funds to patrol the streets. 1111 Mayor Solorio suggested that staff speak to Mr. Breault and address his specific issues. There being no further speakers wishing to present testimony, Mayor Solorio closed the public hearing. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember Williams, to waive the reading in full and read by title only and introduce Ordinance No. 1012, establishing speed limits on various City streets. Motion carried on a 3-0 vote with Councilmember Oaks absent and one Council seat vacant. ORDINANCE NO. 1012 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SPEED LIMIT ZONE ON THE BELOW STATED STREETS WITHIN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 7.1 City Computer Update • 5 • August 15, 1995 Fire Chief Price made a presentation on the status of improvements to the computers. He recommended some outside help, in the absence of qualified staff, until a more permanent solution were determined. Had arranged for Minco Computers in Moreno Valley, who had done some work for the City in the past and were willing, on an interim and temporary basis, to provide emergency service. Also, Debbie in the Police Department had some network experience, and they were willing to share her services, as available. After talking to other public agencies, he found that EMWD had similar systems and they were interested in a cooperative arrangement. An RFP would be developed before he left next week. In response to Council inquiries. some of the local businesses did not possess the necessary background for the network issues. Further advised that some agencies were not interested in assisting or any cooperative arrangement. However, the Hemet School District might be interested some time in the future. He had not talked to the San Jacinto School District nor the College, since this was just a matter of having someone to call on in the event of an emergency, during the interim, but felt there would be better interaction with another public agency. • 7.2 Residential Sprinklers Fire Chief Price made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. In response to Council inquiries, advised that other cities with such an ordinance, were on the outer reaches of areas. and generally those in close, it did not do much for prevention. The State Fire Marshall had not been contacted because staff tried to avoid a lot of statistical analysis, since much could be presented on both sides of the issue and staff tried to stick to strictly facts. With the changes taking place, did not see that sprinklers would have a big effect from that one component, but did not see funding soon to change the services. Advised there was no mechanism for inspections of the sprinklers once they were installed. It could not be offered as an option, because of their presence, or lack thereof, the spacing for hydrants would have to be determined in advance. Instead of hydrants placed at every 300 feet, they could be every 500 feet, which would result in a cost savings for the developer, and better water pressure. Noted that the requirement was part of the 1991 fire defense system, and to remove one part of it, would make it more difficult to reinstate at a later date. Clarified the status of smoke alarms, and the varying requirements over the years. • • August 15, 1995 Councilmember Leahy remembered the extensive study and research on the matter, and felt the cost was well worth the resultant savings. Steve Peacock, President of Peacock Financial Corporation, stated they were the major builder of Rancho San Jacinto. They were currently building home product in the master plan and on the west side of town. Stated it was not a perfect world, nor a perfect market place. They were trying to find a compromise to provide safety on a reasonable basis and also economic stimulation. Noted that smoke detectors saved lives, and the sprinklers were more for material damage control. Agreed with Mr. Price that both could bring in a sea of statistics, but preferred to stick to the facts. Felt that fire sprinklers should not be implemented in the home. With the current economics, preferred a compromise that did not remove the issue from the ordinance, but would allow core development, within a 1 .5 mile radius, to build without the requirement. The economic impact was major, and explained in detail construction loan financing, and how the additional cost would have to be incurred by the developer, in addition to the 30% cost already incurred, based on value, since construction 4111 loans did not cover 100% of the cost. In addition, sprinklers would not allow them to be competitive with other housing product in the area, because it would add another $1,500 to the cost. Felt sprinklers were not warranted nor were the long term safety factors proven. Stated that 80% of all fires occurred in dwellings 20 years or older and no one knew of the problems there might be in later years. Supported option number three as presented in the staff report. Councilmember Williams could see both sides of the issue, and although he tended to be conservative and favor the ordinance as it existed, he was interested enough to hear what CDF had to say on the issue, since they would be contracting fire services to the City. The Council had waived upwards of $125,000 in fees, in an effort to cooperate with the development community, but he would like to hear CDF opinion on the matter. Mr. Peacock stated they had reduced their prices $5,000 in the last 30 days because of the market to make the product more competitive. There was no question the City and the Council was a part of the team and the spirit to make development work. Felt the sprinkler issue needed serious consideration before voting, and requested Council consider the impact to Rancho San Jacinto and the marketplace. August 15, 1995 • Mr. Price clarified for Council the percentage of time lost for a second engine, or mutual aid, was the equivalent of 2,500 medical aid calls per year. Requested the matter be continued to the next meeting so Chief Mello of CDF could respond and not keep Mr. Peacock waiting. Mr. Peacock stated they needed to pull permits in eleven days, and it would help if they could do so without the sprinklers. COUNCIL CONSENSUS that the soonest it could be addressed would be the next meeting, and directed staff to invite the appropriate CDF staff to address the issue at the meeting of September 5, 1995. City Manager Easter requested that Council consider adding a closed session and open session item to the agenda, stating the matter required immediate action and staff did not become aware of it until after the posting of the agenda. It was a litigation item under the Government Code in the matter of RT Capital Corporation vs. City of San Jacinto, because a sale was eminent, and escrow would close prior to the next regular Council session. City Attorney Clark confirmed the request was appropriate. • A MOTION was made by Councilmember Williams, seconded by Councilmember Leahy, to add the items as noted by the City Manger. Motion carried on a 3-0 vote with Councilmember Oaks absent and one Council seat vacant. 8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS Councilmember Williams apologized for not bringing up his comments during the consent calendar, on item 5.5, but wished to raise an issue for future consideration. Requested that the matter of giving preference to local bidders be reviewed again, noting that in item 5.5 the 10% difference in cost would have been more than offset and returned to the community. Requested that staff be directed to find a more definitive process by which Council, without fear of litigation, could allow local vendors to provide services and supplies to the City, even when the cost was not necessarily the lowest. Councilmember Leahy advised the matter had been looked into in past years and that Council was more or less, locked into and obligated to accept the lowest qualified bidder. Legally Council could do nothing more and it was a shame. Agreed the money would remain locally. 8 August 15, 1995 City Attorney Clark noted there was a case just the prior week reaffirming that in over 99.9% of the cases, Council was obligated to accept the lowest bid. Mr. Williams inquired about protected classes? Ms. Clark noted she could review the case and see if there was any applicability. City Manager Easter advised that both Ms. Clark and City Attorney Cox could review the case and respond back to Council at the September 19, 1995 meeting. Mr. Williams suggested the County may have some additional information on the matter. Mayor Solorio suggested that staff also consult EMWD, who were dealing with some of those issues on their Perris facility. They were prepared to challenge the issues and it turned out the lowest bidder was local and they did not get the opportunity to proceed. 8.1 Designation of Voting Delegate for League of California Cities Annual Conference COUNCIL CONSENSUS to select Mayor Solorio as the delegate and Councilmember Williams as the alternate. Councilmember Leahy requested that the packets sent in advance of the conference be discussed at a Council meeting to secure input from all the Council. Mr. Williams commended the Chief of Police and the Officer Advisors, for the San Jacinto Explorer who won top honors at the Orange County Academy. Councilmember Leahy stated that she hoped the transcription service would be reinstated when the capital problems were resolved, to save officers time. Asked that it be given special consideration in the budget process. At the hour of 8:40 P.M. Council recessed. At the hour of 8:50 P.M. Council reconvened for closed session, pursuant to the following, with all members present except Councilmember Oaks who was absent and one Council seat vacant. • 9 August 15, 1995 • 9.0 CLOSED SESSION 9.1 Public Employee Performance Evaluation pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 Title: City Manager 9.2 Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 Negotiator: Richard Kreisler, Gene Price Regarding San Jacinto Police Officers' Association, San Jacinto Firefighters' Association and Public Employees of Riverside County (PERC) 9.3 Pending Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (RT Capital vs. City of San Jacinto) At the hour of 10:08 P.M. reconvened in open session, with all members present except Councilmember Oaks absent, and one Council seat vacant, and announced the following action taken: 8.2 San Jacinto Firefighters Association MOU 411 A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember Williams, to adopt the Fire Association MOU as amended, as the transition MOU with the County. Motion carried on a 3-0 vote with Councilmember Oaks absent and one Council seat vacant. 10.0 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned. The hour of adjournment being 10:15 P.M. Submitted by Approved by Bob Wilson, City Clerk David Solorio, Mayor Deputy City Clerk 11110 10 5' IP- S A N Staff Report [JAC1NT J[ TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk Via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: September 19, 1995 RE: Minutes of Special Meeting - August 30, 1995 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of August 30, 1995, as presented. • • • MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY AUGUST 30, 1995 1.0 CALL TO ORDER The Special Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 4:00 p.m. by Mayor Solorio in the Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, California. Present: Councilmembers Leahy, Oaks, Williams, Mayor Solorio Absent: Council Seat Vacant 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person may address the Council on any subject pertaining to city business listed on the agenda, during this portion of the meeting. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the Council. 4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS At the hour of 4:03 p.m. Council convened with all members present, except one Council seat vacant, for closed session pursuant to the following: 9.0 CLOSED SESSION 9.1 Existing Litigation - Maclin Market vs. City of San Jacinto, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 At the hour of 4:15 p.m. Council reconvened in open session with all Councilmembers present, except one Council seat vacant and announced the following: • COUNCIL CONSENSUS to authorize the filing of an appeal to the tentative ruling, if necessary. Carried on a 4-0 vote. 1 10.0 ADJOURNMENT • There being no further business to conduct , the meeting was adjourned. The hour of adjournment being 4:16 p.m. Approved Mayor Submitted by Bob Wilson, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk • • 2 • STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor and City Council FROM John Hen-era-Finance Director Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager SUBJECT: Approval of Register of Audited Demands and Payroll Checks DATE: September 19 , 1995 RECO1VIMENDATION Approve warrant numbers 41274 through 41379 dated September 15, 1995 in the amount of $499,912.60 and Payroll check numbers 5845 through 5933 dated August 18, 1995. • SUMMARY A listing of accounts payable warrants is attached for your review and approval. Payroll information is available for your review in the Finance Department. • PROGRAM: GM313U ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER S GROUP NUMBER 2 00057 PREPAIPS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 03/1996 _ GROUP USER ANNE TRANS4 TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ F.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT 1 DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 100 09/05/1995 000585 00 010-1400-414.34-05 0001831 LARRY WEAVER REQ 2,266.25 INTERIM FINANCE DIRECTOR: 00/00/0000 0041274 09/01/1995 N .. 200 09/05/0995 000586 00 800-0000-101.20-00 0000235 CITY OF SAN JACINTO REQ 81,419.55 ix NET PAYROLL 00/00/0000 0041275 09/01/1995 N 300 09/05/1995 000587 00 085-0000-202.21-41 0000969 RIVERSIDE CO. EMPLOYEES STMT 4,185.37 CREDIT UNION DEDUCTION. 00/00/0000 0041276 09/01/1995 N — — — — p, 400 09/05/1995 000588 00 095-0000-202.21-29 0000691 LINCOL.N NATIONAL STMT 1,233.15 2' DEFERRED COMPENSATION 00/00/0000 0041277 09/01/1995 N ; 500 09/05/1995 000589 00 085-0000--202.21-29 0000607 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST STMT 1,000.69 DEFERRED COMPENSATION 00/00/0000 004.1278 09/01/1995 N 600 09/05/1995 000590 00 010-1400-414.34-05 0001068 RAY BOUZA REQ 803.25 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 00/00/0000 0041279 09/01/1995 N 700 09/05/1995 000591 00 010-3100-431.33-10 0000727 MICROFLIGHT COMPUTERS REQ 144.05 REPAIR LASERJET POLICE DEPARTMENT 00/00/0000 0041280 09/01/1995 N ,a • 800 09/05/1995 000592 00 010-3100-431.31-25 0001399 ALL TRIPS —N— THINGS REQ 104.00 " AIR FARE/WORKER'S COMP SEMINAR—POST REIMBURSABLE 00/00/0000 0041281 09/01/1995 N 900 09/05/1995 000593 00 074-0000-103.12-25 0000730 MINCO COMPUTERS REQ 3,000.00 EMPLOYEE COMPUTER PURCHASE/LEASE PROGRAM 00/00/0000 0041282 09/01/1995 N _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ __ _____ _ _ 0 1000 09/11/1995 000609 00 050-9000-450.31-20 0001004 CALVIN HELM REQ 51.72 '1 BACKFLOW PREVENTION CLASS 00/00/0000 0041283 09/05/1995 N 1100 09/11/1995 000610 00 050--9000-450.31-20 0001985 REGENTS—UC REQ 323.50 BACKFLOW PREVENTION CLASS CALVIN HELM 00/00/0000 0041284 09/05/1995 N 1200 09/11/0995 000611 00 010-3100-431.31-25 0001381 SHIRLEY WILLIAMS REQ 368.00 DUI SEMINAR POST REIMBURSABLE 00/00/0000 0041285 09/06/1995 N 1300 09/11/1995 000612 00 010-3100-431.31-25 0001986 V.T. & ASSOCIATES REQ 378.00 SEXUAL HARASSMENT WORKSHOP--POST REIMB. 00/00/0000 0041286 09/06/1995 N I r. 1400 09/11/1995 000613 00 010-3100-431.31-25 0001339 DEBRA CASKEY REQ 184.00 SEXUAL HARASSMENT WORKSHOP—POST REIMB. 00/00/0000 0041287 09/06/1995 N 1500 09/11/1995 000614 00 010-1700-417.21-10 0001034 CITY OF SAN JACINTO PETTY REQ 3.11 REPLENISH PETTY CASH 00/00/0000 0041288 09/06/1995 N • • — • —_ PROGRAM: C 3U ACCOUNTS PAYAW UPDATE LIST REPORT ER 5 GROUP NU 00057 F'REF'AIDS _ ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 03/1996 GROUP USER ANNE -- - TRANS* TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER F'ROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION I DESCRIPTION 2 - - _ DUE DATE _ -. CHECK _-CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS t. 1600 09/11/1995 000615 00 010-1400-414.31-15 0001034 CITY OF SAN JACINTO PETTY REQ 15.83 REPLENISH PETTY CASH 00/00/0000 0041288 09/06/1995 N 1700 09/11/1995 000616 00 010-2500-425.21-10 0001034 CITY OF SAN JACINTO PETTY REQ 31.97 REPLENISH PETTY CASH 00/00/0000 0041288 09/06/1995 N 1800 09/11/1995 000617 00 010-2500-425.36-25 0001034 CITY OF SAN JACINTO PETTY REQ 5.00 REPLENISH PETTY CASH 00/00/0000 0041288 09/06/1995 N 1900 09/11/1995 000618 00 010-3200-431.21-10 0001034 CITY OF SAN JACINTO PETTY REQ 3.12 REPLENISH PETTY CASH 00/00/0000 0041288 09/06/1995 N 2000 09/11/1995 000619 00 010-3300-431.21-10 0001034 CITY OF SAN JACINTO PETTY REQ 1.5.88 REPLENISH PETTY CASH 00/00/0000 0041288 09/06/1995 N 2100 09/11/1995 000620 00 010-4150-410.21-10 0001034 CITY OF SAN JACINTO PETTY REO 6.21 REPLENISH PETTY CASH 00/00/0000 0041288 09/06/1995 N 2200 09/11/1995 000621 00 010-7400-425.21-10 0001034 CITY OF SAN JACINTO PETTY REQ 22.09 REPLENISH PETTY CASH 00/00/0000 0041288 09/06/1995 N 2300 09/11/1995 000622 00 021-4150-410.40-01 0001034 CITY OF SAN JACINTO PETTY REQ 11.31 REPLENISH PETTY CASH 00/00/0000 0041288 09/06/1995 N 2400 09/11/1995 000623 00 050-9000-450.21-10 0001034 CITY OF SAN JACINTO PETTY REQ 1.33 REPLENISH PETTY CASH 00/00/0000 0041288 09/06/1995 N 2500 09/11/1995 000624 00 055-4170-450.33-30 0001034 CITY OF SAN JACINTO PETTY REQ 10.92 REPLENISH PETTY CASH 00/00/0000 0041288 09/06/1995 N 2600 09/11/1995 000625 00 085-0000-202.21-35 0000472 EYE CARE OF AMERICA STMT 409.04 E_YE CARE PREMIUM SEPTEMBER 1995 00/00/0000 0041289 09/05/1995 N 2700 09/11/1995 000626 00 065-0000-201.08-64 0000969 AETNA HEALTH PLANS OF STMT 737.30- COBRA TERMINATION MAX PERRY 00/00/0000 0041290 09/05/1995 N 2800 09/11/1995 000627 00 085-0000-202.21-39 0000969 AETNA HEALTH PLANS OF STMT 2,280.85 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM SEPTEMBER 1995 00/00/0000 0041290 09/05/1995 N 2900 09/11/1995 000628 00 065-0000-201.08-64 0000149 HEALTH NET STMT 291.80 COBRA INSURANCE-WARREN 00/00/0000 0041291 09/05/1995 N 3000 09/11/1995 000629 00 085-0000-202.21-39 0000149 HEALTH NET STMT 16,724.50 HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM SEPTEMBER 1995 00/00/0000 0041291 09/05/1995 N PROGRAM: (,M313U ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER GROUP NUMBER 00057 PREPAIDS ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 03/1996 1 GROUP USER ' ANNE 2 TRANS* TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECKS CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS F 17 3100 09/12/1995 000630 00 050-9000-450.21-10 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER REG 1,000.00 POSTAGE - WATER BILLS 00/00/0000 0041292 09/12/1995 .• 3200 09/12/1995 000631 00 085-0000-202.21-28 0000830 PERS RED 6,062.86 PERS MEMBERSHIP CONTRIBUTIONS 00/00/0000 0041293 09/12/1995 3300 09/12/1995 000632 00 010-1100-411.31-20 0001988 SHERIFF'S SPECIAL EVENTS RED 25.00 CRIME SUMMIT & PUBLIC SAFETY FAIR-MAYOR SOLORIO 00/00/0000 0041294 09/12/1995 GROUP TOTALS COUNT: 33 AMOUNT: 121.P05.05 ------- - _ . • • • PROGRAM: 0 ' 3U ACCOUNTS PAYAB UPDATE LIST REPORT ER 5 GROUP NU OOU58 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ACCOUNTING PERIODS 03/1996 F GROUP USER ANNE TRANS TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT ____DESCRIPTISN1-- DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 100 09/05/1995 000594 00 010-3100-431.E-1-10 0001982 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS 1901035 78.46 ; CHAIRMAT POLICE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 200 09/05/1995 000595 00 050-9000-450.33-30 0001983 CROWLEY COMPANY 6422 728.39 CHEMICAL FEED PUMP WATER DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 300 09/05/1995 000596 00 010-3100-431.21-10 0001984 FREESTYLE 401.476 163.23 VHS TAPE.-DISPATCH RECORDING MACHINE 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 400 09/05/1995 000597 00 010-3100-431.21-10 0001984 FREESTYLE 4E13855 154.98 VHS TAPE•-DISPATCH RECORDING MACHINE 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 500 09/05/1995 000598 00 010-7400-425.33-10 0000563 HEMET HEATING & COOLING 6365 67.50 SERVICE AIR CONDITIONER COMMUNITY CENTER 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 600 09/05/1995 000599 00 041-4155-410.40-01 7477 0001960 KIMLEY HORN & ASSOCIATES• 50866 827.50 DESIGN OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 700 09/05/1995 000600 00 025-7260-410.21-30 0001028 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY 182666 1,029.23 STREET LIGHT REPLACEMENT PARTS 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 800 09/05/1995 000601 00 065-0000-201.08-64 0001881 MASTER K-9 1940.1942 282.14 GRAPHICS AND MUZZLE K-9/POLICE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 900 09/05/1995 000602 00 025-7252-410.33-30 0001296 OASIS IRRIGATION 175181 233.84 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES LLMD 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1000 09/05/1995 000603 00 025-7252-410.33-30 0001296 OASIS IRRIGATION 175180 115.40 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES LLMD 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1100 09/05/1995 000604 00 025-7252-410.33-30 0001296 OASIS IRRIGATION 175298 300.62 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES LLMD 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1200 09/05/1995 000605 00 010-3200-431.21-35 0001126 PHENIX TECHNOLOGY INC. 6456 329.72 LEATHER HELMET I.D. SHIELDS-FIRE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1300 09/05/1995 000606 00 010-7400-425.21-10 0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 189865 34.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES COMMUNITY CENTER 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1400 09/05/1995 000607 00 010-4150-410.33-30 0000316 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS 277762 48.74 NO PED XING SYMBOLS 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1500 09/05/1995 000608 00 010-3100-431.21-10 0000307 XEROX CORPORATION 156216779 118.53 FUSER LUBE POLICE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N r ...! O :� s ! In7: 7) T C ! CDD o o C ! C) Z C C 7: I HN � D '! 3 a 71 C;r Z •• • . -; cn m C M1 morn C O, zCm z z3 1773 m 0) M CA i z C D I T D . !L 1 D tR zz, C «`» I T wo net \ c Ir. 7 ►' U. to •-U m I� c iM D j 7! '?i C) CC HC7 O �! .ZZ o Z • n -4 C -I ►+ 0 :)Z O • h) -I -4 D I ?3 (A r — Z I D r CI J) C 1 -< I ! D x i x m r 7! I m I ! D I -o is I 77 i 0 i 0 0 i C. C r z C -1 m Cl) T. ! n • ?' DO D � • m i D x • z i m i C o -o T I D m C ! , -1 1 nm i m 7Z ar o r ! C7 7? co 1 1 Iz ! i i T!D t- m I ! I -I ! -< i 7 m f 1 i 1 ! N C 0 i 1 ►+ I i 7]C) Dm I Z I N Z I C I 3 I xm i I 77 I I 7? I m I r I O n • 1 r : D r : rn I 7.1 ; O ! z i I I I cn c 1 1 . u F'F200RAM2 r 313U ACCOUNTS PAYA UPDATE LIST REPORT BER S GROUP N 2 00062 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 9-15-95 ACCO TING PERIODS 03/1996 GROUP USER ANNE TRANS* TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER F'ROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1 - ____DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK* CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 100 09/13/1995 000633 00 050-9000-450.33-30 0000924 AL_1_ PURE CHEMICAL 19 15693 1.556.15 CHLORINE CYLINDERS WATER DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 200 09/13/1995 000634 00 039-4155--410.40-01 0001655 ARCO PRODUCTS, INC. STMT 5,727.47 CONSTRUCT REINFORCED SQUASH BOX-7TH & S.J. ST. 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 300 09/13/1995 000633 00 010-3100-431.31-25 0001215 BARBARA THOMAS REQ 104.00 PUBLIC RECORDS ACT POST REIMBURSABLE 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 400 09/13/1995 000636 00 096-9700-470.31-20 0001147 CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT REQ 51.84 LOW & MODERATE INCOME HOUSING SEMINAR NOTEBOOK 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 500 09/13/1995 000637 00 010-1200-412.33-50 0000216 CAR WASH DEPOT 39 7.00 CITY VEHICLE WASHES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 600 09/13/1995 000638 00 010-3100-431.33-50 0000216 CAR WASH DEPOT 39 45.50 CITY VEHICLE WASHES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 700 09/13/1995 000639 00 010-3100-431.34-11 0000218 CASTELLANO'S TOWING SERV. 21749 70.00 TOWING OF NARC UNIT POLICE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 800 09/13/1995 000640 00 010-3100-431.34-11 0000218 CASTELLANO'S TOWING SERV. 21310 35.00 TOWING OF UNIT 110 POLICE DEF'ARTME_NT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 900 09/13/1995 000641 00 066-8051-450.34-06 0000553 CITY OF HEMET REQ 30.492.35 CITY TO CITY RECYCLING CHARGES - JULY 1995 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1000 09/13/1995 000642 00 010-3100-431.33-11 0000238 COM SER CO. 01-006755-000-0 150.00 REPAIRS ON UNIT 103 POLICE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1100 09/13/1995 000643 00 096-9700--470.30-90 0000252 CO7AD AND THOMSEN, INC. 9289 310.20 DESIGN ON NEW CATCH BASIN SAN JACINTO & LA ENTRAT.DA 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1200 09/13/1995 000644 00 010-3100-431.31-25 0000179 CF'OA REQ 129.00 PUBLIC RECORDS COURSE POST REIMBURSABLE 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1300 09/13/1995 000645 00 050-9000-450.33-30 0001983 CROWLEY COMPANY 6460 6.04 `_iHIPF'ING OF WATER EQUIPMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1400 09/13/1995 000646 00 025-7250-410.34-05 7473 0000263 D & J LANDSCAPE & MAINTEN 10487 3,897.50 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AUGUST 1995 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1500 09/13/1995 000647 00 025-7251-410.34-05 7473 0000263 D & J LANDSCAPE & MAINTEN 10487 799.49 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AUGUST 1995 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N ,twur:Hci. uns1ZU HLLUUNIS PAYABLE UPDAIE LIS! REPORT NUMBER J... GROUP NUMBER 1 00062 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 9-15-95 ACCOUNTING PERIOD* 03/1996 GROUP USER ANNE — — -- — . TRANS* TRANS DATE VOUCHER Sic ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 1600 09/13/1995 000648 00 025-7252-410.34-05 7473 0000263 D & J LANDSCAPE & MAINTEN 10487 = J,..., 96.61 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AUGUST 1995 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1700 09/13/1995 000649 00 043-8501-450.30-90 0000275 DE BROS BLUEPRINTING SERV 20317 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1800 09/13/1995 000650 00 010-3200-431.30-90 0000275 DE BROS BLUEPRINTING SERV 20356 4.17 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1900 09/13/1995 000651 00 050-9000-450.33-30 0000949 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS 23842 20.00 BACTERIAL ANALYSIS WATER DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 2000 09/13/1995 000652 00 050-9000-450.33--30 0000949 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS 23793 60.00 . BACTERIAL ANALYSIS WATER DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 2100 09/13/1995 000653 00 050-9000-450.33-30 0000949 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS 56446 22.00 • BACTERIAL ANALYSIS WATER DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 2200 09/13/1995 000654 00 050-9000-450.33-30 0000949 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS 56371 12.00 BACTERIAL ANALYSIS WATER DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 2300 09/13/1995 000655 00 050-9000-450.33-30 0000949 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS 56333 34.00 BACTERIAL ANALYSIS WATER DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 2400 09/13/1495 606,s6 00 065-0000-229.08-67 0001991 CARRIE STRUKEL REG 2.34 __ REIMBURSE OVERPAYMENT ON UTILITY ACCOUNT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 2500 09/13/1995 000657 00 065-0000-201.07-95 0001991 CARRIE STRUKEL REG 37.72 REIMBURSE WATER/TRASH CONSUMER DEPOSIT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 2600 09/13/1995 000658 00 025-7252-410.34-05 0000263 D & J LANDSCAPE & MAINTEN 10420 266:61. - GOPHER CONTROL RANCHO SAN JACINTO 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 2700 09/13/1995 000659 00 056-4665-4...30.33-30 0000280 DEPT. OF HEALTH SERVICES 9510661 2,199.16 AB 2995 WATER SYSTEM FEES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 2800 09/13/1995 000660 00 065-0000-201.08-70 0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST. REG 37,630;36 SEWER FEE COLLECTIONS JULY 1995 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 2(i00 04/13/1445 00066100 025-7100-410.35-10 0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST. STMT 231.09 UTILITY BILLING 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 3000 09/13/1995 000662 00 025-7250-410.35-10 0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST. STMT 1,360.99 — UTILITY BILLING 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N ( I . • • _. _____ F'KUUhaal 1: li 13U ALLUUN I S 1 AYA IJPDA T E. LIST REPORT BER ., GROUP NL S 00062 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 9-15-95 ACCO TING PERIODS 03/1996 GROUP USER ANNE TRANSt TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT _DESCRIPTION1 _DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 3100 09/13/1995 000663 00 025--7250—•410.35--1.0 0000460 EASTERN MUNT.WATER DIST. STMT 4,76 UTILITY PILLING 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1 3200 09/13/1995 000664 00 022-4150-410.40-01 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES STMT 1,462.50 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 3300 09/13/1995 00066S 00 050-9000--450.30-90 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATE..S STMT 1,000.00 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 3400 09/13/1995 000666 00 055-4170-450.30--90 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES STMT 562.50 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 3500 09/13/1995 000667 00 010-4150-410.30-90 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES STMT 1,800.00 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 3600 09/13/1995 000668 00 025-7252-410.30-90 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES STMT 262.50 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 3700 09/13/1995 000669 00 025—/250-410.30-90 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES STMT 75.00 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 3800 09/13/1995 000670 00 081-9100-450.40-01 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES STMT 262.50 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 3900 09/13/1995 000671 00 025-7260--410.30-90 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES STMT 75.00 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N -4000 09/13/1995 000672 00 080-9100-450.40-01 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES STMT 75.00 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 4100 09/13/1995 000673 00 041-4155-410.40-01 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES STMT 150.00 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN. 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 4200 09/13/1995 000674 00 099-9700-470.30-90 0001631 OW ENGINEERING 204 530.00 MAPPING & SURVEYING SERVICES—SHAVER/JORDAN 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 4300 09/13/1995 000675 00 010-2500-425.35-16 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. STMT 555.81 PHONE SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 4400 09/13/1995 000676 00 010-3100-431.35-16 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. STMT 1,262.80 PHONE SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 4500 09/13/1995 000677 00 010-3200-431.35-16 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. STMT 142.99 PHONE SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N PROGRAM: 0M3131J ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 5 GROUP NUMBER 2 00062 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 9-15-95 ACCOUNTING PERIODS 03/1996 IGROUPUSER ANNE .4 ffff TRANS TRANS DATE VOUCHER kK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1 _ DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS - . 4600 09/13/1995 000678 00 010-2500--425.35-16 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. STMT 255.27 PHONE SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 4700 09/13/1995 000679 00 010-4150-410.35-16 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. STMT 28.73 PHONE SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 4800 09/13/1995 000680 00 010--7400-425.35-16 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. STMT 120.94 PHONE SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 4900 09/13/1995 000681 00 025-7252-410.35-16 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. STMT 156.73 PHONE SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 5000 09/13/1995 000682 00 050-9000-450.35-16 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE.. CO. SIMT 153.48 PHONE SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 5100 09/13/1995 000683 00 055-4170-450.35-16 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. STMT 83.84 PHONE SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 5200 09/13/1995 000684 00 010-2500-425.35-16 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. STMT 31.19 PHONE SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 5300 09/13/1995 000685 00 010-3100-431.35-16 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. STMT 133.47 PHONE SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 5400 09/13/1995 000686 00 010-4150-410.35-16 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. STMT 27.21 PHONE SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N , 5500 09/13/1995 000687 00 025-7252-410.35-16 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. STMT 29.91 PHONE SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 5600 09/13/1995 000688 00 010•-1110--41.1.36--25 0000566 HEMET NEWS STMT 175.50 LEGAL ADVERTISING 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 5700 09/13/1995 000689 00 010-1110-411.21-10 0000299 HEMET RUBBER STAMP 9931 41.48 CITY CLERK'S STAMP 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 5800 09/13/1995 000690 00 010-1400-414.21-10 0000299 HEMET RUBBER STAMP 01.77 18.26 SIGNATURE STAMP JOHN HERRERA 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 5900 09/13/1995 000691 00 055-4170-450.33-30 0000582 HEMET VALLEY PIPE & SUPPL 29020 63.15 PIPE & SUPPLIES PARKS DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 6000 09/13/1995 600692 00 050-9000-450.33-30 0000582 HEMET VALLEY FIFE & SUPPL 28883 326.84 F'IF'E & SUPPLIES WATER DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N • • 4111 --- r t:uuliwH: u J 30 Ht.:L:UUN I S I'AYA UPLA I F LIST REPORT DER 5 GROUP N 3 00062 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 9-15-95 ACC TING PERIOD: 03/1996 GROUP USER ANNE TRANS4 TRANS DATE VOUCHER B1< ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION-.1 . _ __._DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK0 CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 6100 09/13/1995 000693 00 050-9000-450.33-30 0000582 HEMET VALLEY F'IF'E & SLJF'F'L_ 29036 21.82 PIPE & SUPPLIES WATER DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 6200 09/13/1995 000694 00 010-4150-410.33-50 0000597 QUALITY AUTO PARTS STMT 88.06 AUTO SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 6300 09/13/1995 000695 00 050-9000-450.33-50 0000597 QUALITY AUTO PARTS STMT 3.11 AUTO SUPPLIES WATER DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 6400 09/13/1995 000696 00 081-9100-450.40-01 0000616 INLAND FOUNDATION ENG. IN 5026•-033 80.00 COMPACTION TESTING LAKE PARK DR. & SOBOBA 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 6500 09/13/1995 000697 00 041-4155-410.40-01 0001960 KIMLEY HORN & ASSOC.IA1F_.S, 51119 4,718.41 PREPARATION AND DESIGNS OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 6600 09/13/1995 000698 00 010-1400-414.34-05 0001831 LARRY WEAVER STMT 1,410.63 INTERIM-FINANCE DIRECTOR 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 6700 09/13/1995 000699 00 010-1400-414.34-05 0001831 LARRY WEAVER STMT 1,850.00 INTERIM-FINANCE DIRECTOR 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 6800 09/13/1995 000700 00 010-3100-431.21-85 0000696 LONGS DRUG STORE 073-92043 10.53 I FILM PROCESSING POLICE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N I 6900 09/13/1995 000701 00 010-4150-410.33-30 0000718 MATICH CORPORATION 35690 553.59 COLD MIX CORPORATE YARD 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7000 09/13/1995 000702 00 050-9000-450.33-30 0000719 MATT CHLOR INC. 10478 2,910.87 REPAIRS TO CHLORINATORS WATER DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7100 09/13/1995 000703 00 065--0000-201.08--69 0000770 O.K. ASSOC. INC. REG 125,573.07 REFUSE COLLECTIONS JJUL.Y 1995 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7200 09/13/1995 000704 00 010-1110-411.34-05 0000686 PAMELA LEE STMT 1,053.06 STAFF ASSISTANCE DEPUTY CITY CLERK 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7300 09/13/1995 000705 00 010-4150--410.34--05 0000984 R.F. DICKSON COMPANY 001 005187 2,795.00 C:ITY WIDE STREET SWEEPING 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7400 09/13/1995 000706 00 010-3100-431.21-10 0000083 RIVERSIDE COUNTY S6PF'L_Y 189631 18.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7500 09/13/1995 000707 00 010-3100-431.21-10 00001383 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 189692 40.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N PROGRAM: UM313U ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 5 GROUP NUMBER 4 00062 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 9-15-95 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 03/1996 GROUP USER ANNE - TRANS4 TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1 - _ _DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK CHECK HATE TYPE LAST TRANS • 7600 09/13/1995 000708 00 010-7400-425.21••10 0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 189962 5.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES COMMUNITY CENTER 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1 7700 09/13/1995 000.709 00 011-7400-425.21-10 0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 190034 3.32 OFFICE SUPPLIES COMMUNITY CENTER 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7800 09/13/1995 000710 00 011-7400--425.21-10 0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 1.90001 14.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES COMMUNITY CENTER 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7900 09/13/1995 000711 00 010-2500-425.21-10 0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 190329 15.62 • - OFFICE SUPPLIES CREDIT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N • 8000 09/13/1995 000712 00 010--1200--412.31--15 0001992 ROD BUTLER RF:O 241.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 8100 09/13/1995 000713 00 010-3100-431.21-15 0001993 SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. RED 85.83 PUBLICATION-POLICE DEPT. 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 8200 09/13/1995 000714 00 025-7260-410.35--14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 1,1.21.16 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 8300 09/13/1995 000715 00 010-6100-425.34-05 0000910 SAN JACINTO MUSEUM ASSOC. RE_.O 1,475.00 CURATOR SERVICES OCTOBER/NOVEMBER & DEC. 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 8400 09/13/1995 000716 00 010-1210-412.30-90 0001492 US FAMILY CARE/HEMET 262927 115.00 PRE--EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL FINANCE DIRECTOR 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 8500 09/13/1995 000717 00 099-9700-470.40-01. 0001994 WESTERN AMERICAN DESIGN STMT 314.71 THIRD STREET PROJECT REDEVELOPMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 8600 09/13/1995 000718 00 010-3100-431.30-90 0000317 WESTERN NURSE SPEC. STMT 1.50.00 BLOOD DRAWS POLICE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 9700 09/13/1995 000719 00 610-3100-431.34-05 0000307 XEROX CORPORATION 569545112 107.67 COPIER LEASE AGREEMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N - 8800 09/13/1995 000720 00 010-2500-425.34--05 0000307 XEROX CORPORATION 569474505 534.62 COPIER LEASE AGREEMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N GROUP TOTALS COUNT: 88 AMOUNT: 246.481.74 • • 41/1 PROGRAMS 3U ACCOUNTS PAYA . • UPDATE LIST REPORT BER 5 OROUP NU : 00063 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 03/1996 GROUP USER ANNE TRANS* TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT _-DESCRIPTION 1_- - DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK* CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 100 09/13/1995 000721 00 010-3200-431.33-10 0000931 AL'S KUBOTA TRACTOR LAWNM 1.3166 27.59 CHAIN FOR CHAINSAW FIRE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 200 09/13/1995 000722 00 010-1100-411.21--10 0000997 ANADY'S TROPHIES 3451 57.10 PLAQUES-CASSELL & REEDER 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 300 09/13/1995 000723 00 010-3100-431.21-13 0001.161 ANIMAL_ MEDICAL_ CENTER STMT 98.00 DOG FOOD K-9 POL..ICE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 400 09/13/1995 000724 00 010-3100-431.30-18 0001161 ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER STMT 60.00 STITCHES FOR BRUNO/K-9 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 500 09/13/1995 000725 00 010-3100-431.31-25 0000953 BARRY BACKLUND REQ 184.00 SEXUAL HARASSMENT COURSE: POST REIMBURSABLE 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 600 09/13/1995 000726 00 010-2500-425.35-16 0001395 BRIAN MCNABB REQ 26.24 REIMBURSEMENT C.F.D. 02 EXPENSES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 700 09/13/1995 000727 00 010-3100-431.31-25 00001.79 CPOA REQ 175.00 ROLE OF POLICE CHIEF SEMINAR--POST REIMBURSABI...E 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 800 09/13/1995 00072E 00 010-3100-431.31-25 0001339 DEBRA CASKET REQ 460.00 ADA & WORKERS COMP WORKSHOP-POST REIMB. 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 900 09/13/1995 000729 00 046.0800-450.30-90 0001249 CHICAGO TITL.E 5E33867 750.00 C.F.D *2 LITIGATION 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1000 09/13/1995 000730 00 046-8800-450.30-90 0001249 CHICAGO TITLE 583865 750.00 C.F.D *2 LIT•IGATION 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1100 09/13/1995 000731 00 010-41.50--410.33--10 0001989 COMMERCIAL. DOOR CO. INC. 3237 543.52 REPAIR DOORS AT CITY YARD 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1200 09/13/1995 000732 00 010-1400-414.30-90 0000244 CONRAD & ASSOCIATES 95-5247 7,500.00 F/Y 1994-95 AUDIT FEES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1.300 09/13/1995 000733 00 050-9000-450.30-90 0000244 CONRAD & ASSOCIATES 95--5247 1,000.00 F/Y 1994-95 AUDIT FEES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1400 09/13/1995 000734 00 055-4170-450.30--90 0000244 CONRAD & ASSOCIATES 9`.- .J247 1,000.00 F/Y 1994-95 AUDIT FEES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1500 09/13/1995 00073E 00 091-9700-470.30-90 0000244 CONRAD & ASSOCIATES 95-5247 750.00 F/Y 1994-95 AUDIT FEES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N PROGRAM: GM3130 ACCOUNTS PAVANE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 5 GROUP NUMBER 00063 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 03/1996 GROUP USER ANNE TRANS4 TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENL.DOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK$ _ CHECK DATE __ TYF•E LAST TRANS F I ' 1600 09/13/1995 000736 00 096-9700-470.30-90 0000244 CONRAD & ASSOCIATES 95-5247 1,000.00 F/Y 1994-95 AUDIT FEES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1700 09/13/1995 000.737 00 099-9700-470.30-90 0000244 CONRAD & ASSOCIATES 95-5247 750.00 F/Y 1994-95 AUDIT FEES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N • 1800 09/13/1995 000738 00 010-1400-414.30-90 0000244 CONRAD & ASSOCIATES 95-5248 750.00 ' ACCOUNTING SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1900 09/13/1995 000739 00 050-9000-450.30-90 0000244 CONRAD & ASSOCIATES 95--5248 500.00 ACCOUNTING SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 2000 09/13/1995 000740 00 091-9700-470.30-90 0000244 CONRAD & ASSOCIATES 95-5248 500.00 �1 ACCOUNTING SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N „1 2100 09/13/1995 000741 00 096-9700-470.30-90 0000244 CONRAD & ASSOCIATES 95-5248 902.00 ACCOUNTING SERVICES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N ,' 2200 09/13/1995 000742 00 010-3100-431.31-25 0001990 CSU SACRAMENTO REG 831.00 • 1 WORKER'S COMP SEMINAR POST REIMBURSABLE_ 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N '" 2300 09/13/1995 000743 00 029-8661-440.40-01 7493 0001987 DAVID T. WASDEN, INC. 1003 32,130.00 , VERNON AVENUE WATERLINE REPLACEMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 41 2400 09/13/1995 000744 00 096-9700-470.40-01 0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST. 10163 2,542.71 ', WATERLINE IMPROVEMENTS ESF•LANADE AVENUE 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N o i 2500 09/13/1995 000745 00 050-9000•-450.33-30 0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST. 10378 1,270.00 ULTRA LOW FLUSH TOILET PROGRAM 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 2600 09/13/1995 000746 00 010-3100-431.21-35 0000475 ENTENMANN-•ROVIN CO. 38107 113.38 MEDAL AWARD OFFICER COOPER 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 2700 09/13/1995 000747 00 010-3100-431.33-50 0000483 EVANS TIRE CO. STMT 1,720.78 TIRES & REPAIRS 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 2800 09/13/1995 000748 00 010-3200-431.33-50 0000483 EVANS TIRE CO. STMT 734.62 ,' TIRES & REPAIRS 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N ' 2900 09/13/1995 000749 00 010-3300-431.33-50 0000483 EVANS TIRE CO. STMT 4.17 TIRES & REPAIRS 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N '' 3000 09/123/1995 000750 00 010-4100-410.33--50 0000483 EVANS TIRE CO. STMT 7.1.70 ' TIRES & REPAIRS 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N , • • 4111 PROGRAM: 0 3U ACCOUNTS PAYAB UPDATE LIST REPORT ER 5 GROUP NU : 00063 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 03/1996 GROUP USER ANNE TRANS* TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ F.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT __ DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK0 CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 3100 09/13/1995 000731 00 010-4150-410.33-50 0000483 EVANS TIRE CO. STMT 1.71.26 TIRES & REPAIRS 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 3200 09/13/1995 000752 00 050-9000-450.33--50 0000483 EVANS TIRE CO. STMT 2,133.85 TIRES & REPAIRS 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 3300 09/13/1995 000753 00 010-3100-431.34-06 0000562 HEMET INSURANCE STMT 178.71 I WAN LINE FOR CLETS POLICE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 3400 09/13/1995 000754 00 010-3100-431.34-06 0001995 GLOBAL REG 496.64 WAND READER FOR EVIDENCE COMPUTER-POLICE DEFT. 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 3500 09/13/1995 000755 00 010-3100-431.34-05 0000546 HAINES & CO. 8057 187.05 i HAINE..S DIRECTORY POLICE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 3600 09/13/1995 000756 00 010-2500-425.21-1.0 0001590 HORIZON WATER STMT 81.47 WATER-POLICE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 3700 09/13/1995 000757 00 099-9700-470.40-01 0000616 INLAND FOUNDATION ENG. IN 5026-040 872.25 COMPACTION TESTING BROWN STREET 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 3800 09/13/1995 000758 00 010-2500-425.34-05 0001093 I.B.M. CORPORATION-5T4 I037286 3,214.48 AS400 LEASE/PURCHASE 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 3900 09/13/1995 000759 00 055-4170-450.34--OS 0000639 JIMNI SYSTEMS. INC. 2066 200.00 MAINTENANCE ON SEWER LIFT JUNE 1995 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 4000 09/13/1995 000760 00 055-4170•-450.34-05 0000639 JIMNI SYSTEMS. INC. 2033 200.00 MAINTENANCE ON SEWER LIFT JULY 1995 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 4100 09/13/1995 000761 00 010-3100-431.35-17 0000674 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE STMT 1.44.81 CELLULAR TELEPHONE BILL. POLICE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 4200 09/13/1995 000762 00 010-3100-431.35-16 0000674 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE STMT 38.32 CAL-ID FAX POLICE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 4300 09/13/1995 000763 00 010-31.00•-431.21-85 0000696 LONGS DRL.I6 STORE 91989 14.83 FILM PROCESSING POLICE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N j 4400 09/13/1995 000764 00 050-9000-450.33-30 0000719 MATT CHLOR INC. 10425 3,000.42 ANNUAL SERVICE ON CHLORINATORS-WATER DEPT. 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 4500 09/13/1995 000765 00 010-2500--425.33-10 0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT 36.92 FLOOR MATS 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N I'F:OORAM f UM313U ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UF'DA I E LIST REPORT NUMBER 5 GROUP NUMBER 1 00063 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ACCOUNTING PERIODS 03/1996 J GROUP USER ANNE r TRANS* TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT , DESCRIPTION 1 _____ DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK* CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS e - v n 4600 09/13/1995 000766 00 010-2500-425.33-10 0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT 49.34 FLOOR MATS 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 4700 09/13/1995 000.767 00 010-4150-410.21-35 0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT 51.40 UNIFORM CLEANING 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 4000 09/13/1995 000768 00 010-4150-410.21-35 0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT 143.67 UNIFORM CLEANING 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 4900 09/13/1995 000769 00 010-4100-410.21-35 0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT 31.51 UNIFORM CLEANING 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1, 5000 09/13/1995 000770 00 010-7400-425.33-10 0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT 21.10 '' FLLOR MATS 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N Y1 31 I v, 5100 09/13/1995 000771 00 055-4170-450.21-35 0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT 25.12 'j UNIFORM CLEANING 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 5200 09/13/1995 000772 00 010-4150-410.21-35 0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT 119.i1 w UNIFORM CLEANING 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1 H1 5300 09/13/1995 000773 00 050-9000-450.21-35 0000.732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT 124.09 UNIFORM CLEANING 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 5400 09/13/1995 000774 00 010--3100--431.33-10 0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT 30.58 ' FLOOR MATS 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 5500 09/13/1995 000775 00 010-1700-417.33-10 0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT 12.33 FLOOR MATS 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N V, 5600 09/13/1995 000776 00 010-3300--•431.21--35 0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT 31.51 UNIFORM CLEANING 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 5700 09/13/1995 000777 00 010-3210-431.21-35 0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT 31.51 UNIFORM CLEANING 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 5800 09/13/1995 000778 00 010-3100-431.31-25 0000593 NAT HOLMES REQ 184.00 SEXUAL HARASSMENT COURSE POST REIMBURSABL..E 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 5900 09/13/1995 000779 00 010-3100-431.31-25 0000593 NAT HOLMES REQ 184.00 ' ROLE OF THE POLICE CHIEF POST REIMBURSABLE 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 6000 09/13/1995 000780 00 010-7400-425.21-10 0000780 OVERNIGHT INDUSTRIAL_ 10451 166.32 • JANITORIAL SUPPLIES COMMUNITY CENTER 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N • • • PROGRAM! U ' 13U ACCOUNTS F'AYAB UPDATE LIST REPORT BER 5 GROUP NU : 00063 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ACCO TING PERIOD: 03/1996 GROUP USER ANNE TRANS* TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT _DESCRIPTION-.-1-.-- ______L'ESCRIPTION.2 -_ DUE DATE CHECK* CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 6100 09/13/1995 000781 00 010-3100-431.33--50 0000793 P.S. HARLEY-DAVIDSON 3692 49.92 TURN SIGNAL BRACKET FOR MOTORCYCLE-POLICE DEPT. 09/1.5/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 6200 09/13/1995 000782 00 010-3300-431.35-16 0000795 F'AGENET A5684717 133.50 PAGERS--POLICE DEPARTMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 6300 09/13/1995 000783 00 010-3100--431.34--05 0001517 PHOENIX GROUP 9215--00 65.00 PARKING CITATIONS JULY 1995 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 6400 09/13/1995 000784 00 010-4100-410.33-30 0000863 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 23419 108.56 MEASURE MASTER MODEL. PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 6500 09/13/1995 000785 00 010-7400-425.21-10 0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 189632 8.91 DESK CALENDAR COMMUNITY CENTER 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 6600 09/13/1995 000786 00 010-7400-425.11-10 0000486 OFELIA SEGALA STMT 45.00 MEDICAL EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 6700 09/13/1995 000787 00 025-7260-410.35-14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 4,058.51 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 6800 09/13/1995 000788 00 010-2500-425.35--14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 1,667.31 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 6900 09/13/1995 000789 00 010-3100--431.35-14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 2,294.36 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7000 09/13/1995 000790 00 010-3200-431.35-14 0000447 SD. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 742.70 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7100 09/13/1995 000791 00 010--4150-410.35-14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 729.06 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7200 09/13/1995 000792 00 010-6100-425.35-14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 62.25 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7300 09/13/1995 000793 00 010-7400-425.35-14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 1,529.13 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7400 09/13/1995 000794 00 025-7100-410.35-14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 920.51 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7500 09/13/1995 000795 00 025--7250-410.35--14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 45.75 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N I-'RUURAM i UM313U ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 5 GROUP NUMBER 2 00063 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ACCOUNTING PERIOD2 03/1996 GROUP USER ANNE 1 TRANST TRANS DATE VOUCHER DK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT . DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS e 7600 09/13/1995 000796 00 025-7251-410.35-14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 33.55 j UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7700 09/13/1995 000797 00 025-7260-410.35-14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 733.89 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7800 09/13/1995 000798 00 025-7260-410.35-14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 43.03 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7900 09/13/1995 000799 00 025-7260-410.35-14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 524.32 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 8000 09/13/1995 000800 00 025-7260-410.35-14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT :I.,583.11 UTIL_ITIE.S 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 8100 09/13/1995 000801 00 025-7260-410.35-14 0000447 90. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 735.19 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 8200 09/13/1995 000802 00 055-4170-450.35-14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 34.04 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 8300 09/13/1995 000803 00 050-9000-450.35-14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 34,380.09 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 8400 09/13/1995 000804 00 010-2500-425.35-1.2 0000436 SO. CALIFORNIA GAS CO. STMT 22.97 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 8500 09/13/1995 000905 00 010-3100-431.35-12 0000436 SO. CALIFORNIA GAS CO. STMT 21.97 I.ITILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0600 09/13/1995 000806 00 010-3200--431.3.:,--1.:' 0000436 SO. CALIFORNIA GAS CO. STMT 14.65 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 8700 09/13/1995 000807 00 010-7400-425.35-12 0000436 SO. CALIFORNIA GAS CO. STMT 91.59 UTILITIES 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 8800 09/13/1995 000808 00 010-4150-410.33-50 0000438 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL 808007 2,957.74 UNLEADED GAS 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 8900 09/13/1995 000809 00 096-9700-470.30-90 0000412 STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON STMT 1,049.48 REDEVLOPMENT ATTORNEY CONSULTANTS 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 9000 09/13/1995 000810 00 025-7100-410.30-90 0000925 TODD BAGLEY LANDSCAPE 95-7-03 646.00 PARK/LLMD ADMINISTRATION AUGUST 1995 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N -- • 0 • PROGRAM! 3U ACCOUNTS FAYA UPDATE LIST REPORT PER ... 0 GROUP NU : 00063 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 03/1996 GROUP USER ANNE TRANS* TRANS DATE VOUCHER Bic ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION I _ DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK* CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 9100 09/13/1995 000811 00 025-7250-410.30-90 0000925 TODD BAGLEY LANDSCAPE 95-7-03 726.00 PARK/L.LMD ADMINISTRATION AUGUST 1995 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 9200 09/13/1995 000812 00 025-7251-410.30-90 0000925 TODD BAGLEY LANDSCAPE 95-7-03 158.00 PARK/LL_MD ADMINISTRATION AUGUST 1995 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 9300 09/13/1995 000813 00 025-7252-410.30-90 0000925 IODD BAGLEY LANDSCAPE 99-7-03 637.00 F'ARK/LL.ML'i ADMINISTRATION AUGUST 1995 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 9400 09/13/1995 000814 00 010-3200-431.34-05 0000795 F'AGENET A5684145 309.00 PAGER RENTAL. FIRE DEPARTMENT 09/t5/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N 9500 09/14/1995 00081b 00 010-7400-425.34-05 0000935 LOUIS ARROYO SIMT 625.00 JANITORIAL SERVICE COMMUNITY CE_NTER--SE_Ff. 09/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N GROUP TOTALS COUNT: 95 AMOUNT: 127.113.50 •g • AGENDA ITEM NO. CITY OF SAN JACINTO STAFF REPORT DATE: September 19, 1995 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Nathaniel Holmes III, Chief of Police via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager SUBJECT: DECLARATION OF SURPLUS PROPERTY RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. declaring certain property as surplus and authorizing the disposal of said property. • FISCAL ANALYSIS: If the property is sold, there would be revenue to the General Fund. BACKGROUND: From time to time, property owned by the City becomes worn or damaged to a point it is not fiscally responsible to repair said property. The attached list (Exhibit "A") reflects property which is of no further use to the City. Passage of the attached resolution will permit the disposal of the property either by sale or destruction which ever is most appropriate. STAFF APPROVALS: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY City Manager City Attorney Finance Director • • RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DECLARING CERTAIN PROPERTY AS SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING DISPOSAL OF SAID PROPERTY WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto from time to time accumulates property not usable as a result of damage, age, or no longer safe for use, and; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto in an effort not to retain property which cannot be used or is not cost effective to repair, has the authority to declare the property as surplus; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of San • Jacinto declares said property as shown on Attachment "A" to be surplus and authorizes the disposal of said property in accordance with lawful procedures. MOVED, PASSED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council on the day of , 1995. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Mayor Deputy City Clerk II EXHIBIT "A" • SURPLUS PROPERTY VEHICLES ITEM UNIT NO. LICENSE VIN OR DESCRIPTION 90 Ford T-Bird 132 2VJF859 1FAPP6044LH142945 OTHER ITEMS ITEM BRAND SERIAL NUMBER MODEL NUMBER SJ Prop # VCR Goldstar 802049035 GVH-57-FM 1053 • • • AGENDA IT EM NO. 5.9 CITY OF SAN JACINTO STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: September 19, 1995 SUBJECT: CHANGE OF ZONE 1-95 ORDINANCE 1013 - Amending the official Zoning Map of the City APPLICANT: Manfred Hall Construction 2124 Chestnut Creek Road Diamond Bar, CA 91766 (909) 861-5947 DESCRIPTION • A change of zone from R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) and R-2 (Two Family Residential) to SD (Senior Development), pertaining to a 6.71 acre parcel located on the west side of State Street, immediately north of Community College Drive. RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. 1013 approving Change of Zone 1-95, waive the reading of the Ordinance in full and read by title only. BACKGROUND Ordinance No. 1013 was introduced by the City Council on September 5, 1995. CCRPT-95\ADOR 1013 • ORDINANCE NO. 1013 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 1-95 THEREBY AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO PERTAINING TO A 6.71 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF STATE STREET, AND NORTH OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE DRIVE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby amended by adding thereto Change of Zone 1-95 as herein set forth. Section 2. That the zoning of the 6.71 acre property in the City of San Jacinto shown on the attached map marked Exhibit "A" made a part hereof, is hereby established as Senior Development (SD). Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. • Section 4. A Negative Declaration has been prepared and adopted pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and City of San Jacinto Resolution No. 1348, as amended, for Change of Zone 1-95. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 5th day of September 1995. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 19th day of September, 1995 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST Mayor Deputy City Clerk • -1- CHANGE OF ZONE 1-95 • EXHIBIT "A" . 1 • . . i.p.....„0/ trrivi ii I .N! f R JAC1VTO• CO 9 0• • AMID mom' iiiiiH - ' I Y. 'iiiiiiiiiIiiii MOB . 7 . . . ' . Pi t, - - 1 • s. � , •. . j if . • ' ' � 1•4►eV'V ♦ III . . Y A ► ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • ♦♦ III ' �� ♦♦♦♦•♦#•♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ M . II m r,♦..♦•♦_♦•♦_♦.. I 1- 7 11P■/11 II •;"., iii� . t , 311_1111111a111111. �1.'~�} .. .- ANON EXPREUUW Y. • . Change in Zone from General Commercial (C2) • to Senior Development (SD) 6.71 Acres, located west of State Street and north of Community College Drive 1 • CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. 1013 duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the 19th day of September, 1995. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of Deputy City Clerk • -2- • �" Staff Report S A N JACINTO TO: Honorable Mayor & Councilmembers FROM: Les Evans, Director of Public Works via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: September 19, 1995 RE: SOBOBA VILLAGE IV PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS NOTICE OF COMPLETION Recommendation: Accept the improvements installed under the Soboba Village IV Public Improvement Project by Nottson Construction and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion. • Fiscal Impact: Funds for the construction of the Soboba Village Public Improvement Project were provided by Assessment District 94 through which a total of$915,213.79 was generated. Background: On August 16, 1994, the City Council awarded the bid for construction of the Soboba Village IV Public Improvements to Nottson Construction for a low bid of $717,310.10. The improvements to be constructed included widening of Soboba Road, installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting, drainage improvements and landscaping. At the request of the Soboba Village Homeowners' Committee,the Council deleted the landscaping portion of the project and directed staff to prepare a new "low maintenance" landscape design and advertise the landscape improvements separately. As the Council knows, the landscape contract was recently awarded to R. K. Allen at a bid of $99,776.00. During the construction, the City Council approved a change order of $8,993.76 for the installation of an outlet structure to protect an existing 54" pipe which carries drainage across the Soboba Springs Country Club Golf Course. • Soboba Village IV/Staff Report • Page Two September 19, 1995 The final contract amount was $625,868.81. Original Bid Amount $ 717,310.10 Change Order 8,993.76 Sub Total $ 726,303.86 Landscape Reduction 100,435.05 Final Amount $ 625,868.81 The work has been satisfactorily completed and staff recommends recording of a Notice of Completion. • WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: CITY CLERK City of San Jacinto 312 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR RECORDERS USE ONLY Notice is hereby given by the undersigned owner, a political subdivision of the State of California, that a public work of improvement described as Street improvements and drainage facilities for the Snhnha S„pz444gs Improvement Project . has been completed and was accepted by the undersigned awarding authority on the date hereof. The contractor on such work was Nottson ('nnstruct i and the surety bond is with • The real property upon which said work was performed is in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of California and described as: (Legal description or street address or other specific location) Soboba Road in the vicinity of Soboba Springs Golf Course and Tracts 21900 and 21900-1 in Assessment District No. 94-1 Date: 9-19-95 City of San Jacinto (Date of Acceptance) (Name of Political Subdivision) STATE OF CALIFORNIA By es Evans COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Title Director of Pnhl i r Workc I hereby certify that I am the Deputy City Clerk of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California the political subdivision which executed the foregoing notice and on whose behalf I make this verification: that I have read said notice, know its contents, and that the same is true. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at San Jacinto, California on (Date) • irr • Staff Report S A N JACINTO TO: Honorable Mayor & Councilmembers FROM: Les Evans, Public Works Director via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: September 19, 1995 RE: LAKE PARK DRIVE - AWARD OF BIDS Recommendation: Award the bid for the Construction of the Lake Park Drive Cut-off Walls to Nottson Construction,for a low bid of$71,521 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. • Fiscal Analysis: FEMA has obligated funds in the amount of $67,357 for the construction of a new concrete crossing at Lake Park Drive. The difference in the low bid amount and the FEMA funds is $4,164. The City may be able to get additional FEMA funds. If not, Local Transportation Funds in Account No. 75 are available for this purpose. The balance in Account No. 75 was $100,447 on June 30, 1995. Background: On September 6, 1995, the City Clerk received bids for the construction of a concrete roadway across Lake Park Drive. A summary of the bids received follows: Nottson Construction $ 71,521.00 Vance Corporation 81,500.00 Hillcrest Contractors 105,575.00 Genesis Construction 119,750.00 • Lake Park Drive Bridge • Staff Report/Page Two September 19, 1995 Nottson Construction, of Romoland, has previously performed public works construction for the City and has done a good job. Staff recommends award of the bid to Nottson Construction. Construction should start in early October and be completed by mid-November. The construction will cause some inconvenience to motorists and may require night time closure of the crossing for up to 10 days to accommodate concrete curing time. • • • AGENDA ITEM NO. 5. 11 -, CITY OF SAN JACINTO STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council sitting as the Redevelopment Agency Board of Directors FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: September 19, 1995 SUBJECT: SAN JACINTO AVENUE AND THIRD STREET REDEVELOPMENT HOUSING PROJECT - Amendment No. 1 to the Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) between the Redevelopment Agency and Kenneth Mark Johnson RECOMMENDATION: Amend the DDA between the Redevelopment Agency and Kenneth Mark Johnson to • decrease the construction budget from $65,933.23 to $65,116.23; and approve a grant in the amount of $4,175 per unit, for the first two units, to Kenneth Mark Johnson for rough grading, soils tests, surveying and staking. BACKGROUND: The DDA between the City and Kenneth Mark Johnson was approved by the Agency Board on June 20, 1995. Since that time, Staff and Mr. Johnson have been in the process to implement the DDA. The construction budget for the DDA included all the facets of the development that were required of Mr. Johnson. Rough grading was not included in Mr. Johnson's scope of services. The omission of rough grading from Mr. Johnson's scope of services was based upon the presumption that rough grading and infrastructure improvements would be borne by the City and conducted simultaneously before the Agency turned the property over to Mr. Johnson. However, because the escrow was completed before the Agency could undertake the infrastructure construction and grading, the Agency can not legally do the grading. Redevelopment law prohibits the Agency from undertaking construction projects on private property. Therefore, the cost for rough grading the property had to be added to the private construction project and included as a grant to Mr. Johnson. The reason the • rough grading is considered a grant and not a loan, is that the Agency committed to bear the cost of rough grading while negotiating with Mr. Johnson. Staff Report/September 19, 1995 1111 port/ e S p Additional studies and actions that are related to and required to determine the extent of grading include soils tests, surveying and staking. The costs of these items are included in the grant funds. The grant is in the amount of $4,175 per unit. The installation of yard drains is also being added to the project. The installation of the yard drains reduces the need for extensive fill material. The yard drains were not included as part of the grant because the yard drains are part of precise grading and landscaping, which were originally included in the construction loan. The cost for the yard drains is $282.50 per unit.. The proposal to delete the fire sprinklers from the dwellings is based upon the recent City Council action that removed the requirement for residential fire sprinklers when the development is within 1.5 miles from Fire Station No. 1. The site is approximately 3/4 of mile from Fire Station No. 1. Deletion of the fire sprinklers will result in a savings of approximately $1,100 per unit. With the addition of the yard drains and the deletion of the fire sprinklers, the construction cost was reduced from 65,933.73 to $65,116.23. The cost per square foot was reduced from $52.00 to $51.35. The DDA may need to be amended in the future, as the grant for the rough grading is • applicable to only the first two lots. Depending on the timing of the conveyance on the remainder of the property, the rest of the rough grading may be undertaken by the Agency. Page No. 3 of the revised construction budget is attached as Exhibit "B." Exhibit "C" constitutes the cost breakdown related to the grant items. Attachments: Exhibit "A" - DDA Revised Pages 7, 17, 18 Exhibit "B" - Page No. 3 of the Revised Construction Budget Exhibit "C" - Grant of Funds Cost Breakdown CCRPT-95\DDA3&SJ.AMD 410 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDED PAGES DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 1. Page No. 7, Section 3.3 2. Page No. 17, Section 5.1 3. Page No. 18, Section 5.2 411111 3. DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE BY BUILDER 3_1 Scope of Development41111 The Site shall be developed in accordance with and within the limitations established in the Redevelopment Plan as it now exists or is hereafter amended consistent with the provisions of this Agreement, and in accordance with Attachment No. 3, Scope of Development. 3.2 Construction Drawings and Related Documents Developer shall construct the single-family homes per approved Construction Drawings, based upon the approved Site Development Plan (Attachment No. 4). Construction shall be pursuant to the requirements in Attachment No. 3, Scope of Development. If any revisions or corrections shall be required by the Agency, City or any other official agency, department or bureau of the City or any other governmental agency having jurisdiction, the Developer and the Agency shall cooperate in efforts to comply with such revisions or corrections, to obtain waiver of such requirements, or to develop a mutually acceptable alternative. If no such alternative is developed, the Developer shall be bound by such revisions or corrections. Additionally, the Developer shall follow the final grading plans prepared by Cozad and Thomsen, Inc., and any public improvement plans related thereto. 3.3 Cost of Construction The cost of developing the Site and construction of all improvements hereon shall be borne by the Developer. The Agency will provide funds to the developer, in the form of a construction loan not to exceed $65,116.23.23 (amended 9/19/95) per dwelling secured by a Deed of Trust and recorded in a form acceptable to the Agency. In addition, the Agency will also provide a grant to the developer in an amount not to exceed $4,175 (amended 9/19/95). The following constitutes project expenditures: Rough Grading (soils tests, surveying and staking: paid for by grant funds) (amended 9/19/95) Precise Grading Direct Construction Finished Area Improvements - On-Site Indirect Construction Costs Final Costs General Administration Contingency The detailed breakdown for each of the major cost expenditures is provided in the Construction Budget prepared by Kenneth Mark Johnson (Attachment No. 6) (amended 9/19/951. All disbursements of funds from the Agency to the Developer shall be paid within 14 days of receipt of invoices and shall be based on Agency approved invoices, accompanied by releases of all liens from laborers, suppliers, sub-contractors, and others, related thereto. 3.4 Construction Schedule Developer shall begin and complete all construction and development of the Site consistent with the approved Construction Drawings for the Project, based upon the approved Site Development Plan (Attachment No. 4). The Developer shall begin and complete all construction and development within the times specified in Attachment No. 8 or such reasonable extension of said dates as may be granted in writing by the Agency. The Schedule of Performance is subject to revision from time-to-time as mutually agreed upon in writing between Developer and Agency. All construction shall be done in accordance with the General Plan and all applicable zoning and building ordinances for the City of San Jacinto. 410 Page No. 7 4_6 Covenants of Owner. The Owner of each Restricted Unit by acceptance of a deed to the Restricted Unit covenants and agrees that, at all times during the Affordability Period, its Restricted Unit will be continuously occupied by Owner as its principal residence, and shall not be rented, subleased, or subject to any other business arrangement, whereby consideration shall be paid by an occupant of a Restricted Unit; provided, if the Restricted Unit is occupied by an Eligible Person or Family, the family members whose income was considered in determining the eligibility of that family may make monetary contributions toward the Purchase Housing Costs of the Restricted Unit. Owner agrees that it shall not record or cause the recordation of any deed of trust (a "Further Encumbrance") securing a note having an original principal sum which, when added to the sum of the principal amount(s) of any notes secured by any deeds of trust against the Restricted Property as of the date of trust against the Restricted Property as of the date of recordation of the Further Encumbrance, exceeds the Fair Market Value of the Restricted Property. 4_7 Uses in Accordance with Redevelopment Plan; Nondiscrimination The Developer covenants and agrees for itself, its successors, its assigns, and every successor in interest to the Sites or any part thereof that the Developer and such successors and assignees, shall devote the Sites to the uses specified in the Redevelopment Plan, the Grant Deed (Attachment No. 5), the Declaration of Conditions , Covenants and Restrictions (Attachment No. 7) and this Agreement for the periods of time specified therein. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land. The Developer covenants by and for itself and any successors in interest that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the Site, nor shall the Developer itself or any person claiming under or though it establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with • reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees of the Sites. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land. The Developer shall refrain from restricting the rental, sale or lease of the property on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin or ancestry of any person. 4.8 Effect and duration of Covenants The covenants established in this Agreement shall, without regard to technical classification and designation, be binding on Developer and any successor in interest to the site or any part thereof for the benefit and in favor of Agency, its successors and assigns, and City. 5. SALES PRICE OF HOMES 5.1 Sales Price The sales price of each of the completed homes has been set at the greater of $69,900.00 or the maximum price at which the Purchase Housing Cost to be paid by the Proposed Transferee would not exceed Affordable Housing Cost amount established pursuant to Section 4.4 (b). Any deviation from the price of the individual houses sold shall be at the sole discretion of the Agency. If the developer fails to construct each home within the budget and contingency established in Attachment No. 6 (Construction Budget) (amended 9/19/95), the amount over the budget for each individual house shall be borne by the Developer. • Page No. 17 5.2 Real Estate Commissions 10 In the event the Developer commissions a real estate agent/broker to sell the units, the Agency shall not be liable for the payment of any real estate commission related thereto, except as provided for in Attachment No. 6 (Construction Budget) (amended 9/19/951. 5.3 Disbursement of Home Sale Proceeds Sales proceeds from the purchase of each individual house within the Project by a qualified household, as described in Section 4.1, shall be returned to the Agency. 6. DEFAULTS, REMEDIES AND TERMINATION 6.1 Applicable Law The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Agreement. 6.2 Termination by Developer Developer may terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) calendar days written notice thereof to Agency in the event that: (a) City of San Jacinto does not issue the necessary building permits to commence construction of the houses within ninety (90) calendar days following the approval of construction drawings, as specified in this Agreement. 6.3 Termination by Agency • Agency may terminate this Agreement if: a) Developer fails to complete the construction of the two houses within one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days from the issuance of the necessary building permits from the City. b) Developer fails to complete the sale of one of the first two constructed homes on the Site within ninety (90) calendar days following the completion of construction and issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the first such home constructed. c) Developer fails to complete the sale of both units within one-hundred and fifty (150) calendar days following the completion of construction and issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for the two homes constructed. d) Developer's cost for construction of any of the individual homes exceeds the budgeted amount including contingency and Developer Profit as shown in Attachment No. 6 construction Budget. e) Developer commits any other material breach of this Agreement. f) Any default or failure referred to in this Section may be cured within thirty (30) days after the date of written demand by Agency. Page No. 18 EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHMENT NO. 6 CONSTRUCTION BUDGET • • . .. .. _.. .._...._,..'..._. ....... 1... .d.a-1....1u�.1..1Y.....ra..L......a....wm.is).. �.i..•.........a......-..u.n._. .. ._....ten..�...u. —..... City of San Jacinto Affordable housing- Third St. & San Jacinto St. FLOOR AND WINDOW COVERING ALLOWANCES 111 Tile Entry way $200 .00 Linoleum at kitchen and baths $350 .00 Carpet $1,500 .00 Window Coverings $0 .00 SUB-TOTAL: $2 ,050 . 00 MISCELLANEOUS Labor $825 . 00 Garage Door (16X7 Metal ) $500.00 Stonework/Masonry $500 .00 Trash Removal $250.00 Equipment Rental $200 .00 Trenching --fi-1-5-0:$0-- $432.50 Coarse of Const . Ins . + Deductible $1 , 500 .00 FIRESPRINRLERS --$I,;�$0;0 - $0.00 Misc $525.00 SUB-TOTAL: --$5755-f-700--- $4,732.50 LANDSCAPING Fencing(5' -wood per city stds . ) $650 .00 Irrigation (TIMER,PIPES ,HEADS,LABOR) $600 .00 Planting (1-TREE,GRASS SEED,PLANTS) $440 .00 SUB-TOTAL: $1, 690 .00 LEGAL ALLOWANCES Permits $0 .00 School Fee $0 .00 Developer Fees $0 . 00 SUB-TOTAL: $0 . 00 TOTAL JOB COSTS --05-2 1-6-9-0$--- $51 ,951.50 CONTINGENCY $1 ,055 . 38 OVERHEAD/PROFIT/SUPERVISION $7 , 915 . 35 HOME SALES COMMISION-6% $4,194.00 TOTAL BUILDING COST $65,116.23 SQUARE FOOT COST $51.523500 411111 PAGE - 3 EXHIBIT "C" GRANT FUNDS COST BREAKDOWN WESTERN MOST TWO LOTS 1. $6,250.00 Rough Grading - To include removal of existing cactus and four foot fence at northerly property line, overexcavate 36 inches of material five feet past all building lines, recompact and increase pad elevations per plans. 2. $900.00 Soils Tests 3. $1,200.00 Surveying and Staking Total - $8,350.00 Per Unit Grant Amount - $4,175.00 4110 • AGENDA ITEM NO. Q • CITY OF SAN JACINTO STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: September 19, 1995 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 28224 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 1-95 • APPLICANT: National Preferred Holding 2081 Business Center Dr. #195 Irvine, CA 92715 (714) 833-8294 NEIGHBORHOOD: Spice Ranch RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Vesting Tentative Tract 28224 and the corresponding Development Plan subject to the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval. DESCRIPTION A proposal to create a 223 lot Single Family Planned Unit Development on approximately 31.5 acres located on the south side of Seventh Street, east of the Ramona Expressway. • 1)0 2 BACKGROUND • This item was considered by the Planning Commission at a public hearing held on August 9, 1995. The Planning Commission approved the project subject to the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval which are attached. The Planning Commission was concerned about the potential for this project to lose its age restricted status in the event new or different senior housing standards are adopted by the Federal government. As a result Planning Department Condition of Approval No. 18 was added by the Planning Commission to ensure compliance with any new Federal guidelines. ATTACHMENTS: Environmental Review Negative Declaration Planning Commission Report • • - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ' ►0 3 • Environmental Assessment No. Case No. Date -7-f 3 - 9 C Name of Proponent dt-IL-th n i 67_.re f r i'( .710(0/�J%_. Address 0 R / ;0:us/tr..) E' 55 rC'yl�e('O(- it 9 V/VI (211 Phone (�/q - i? a c V Agency Requiring Checklist C/ 747 O cO M ' 'c / 4-"n 0 P":oject Name (if applicable) CITY OF SAN JACINTO Community Development Department 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, California 92583 • ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFEC TED: )0 A The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. • Land Use and Planning Transportation/Circulation Public Services Population and Housing Biological Resources Utilities arth Resources Energy and Mineral Resources Aesthetics Water ' k of Upset and Human Health Cultural Resources Air Quality Noise Recreation Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION. On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. although the proposed project could have a significant effect on I find that g p p the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. VI° I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposedproject ro'ect MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least 1) one effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards; and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sreets, if the effect is a " potentially significant impact" or "potential significant unless mitigated. " AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Signature z , ,_, /��J_/ Date 7 — f Printed e and Title S , s' tC-� \ I ka Av. �-- 1 For 1 Potsonally . Pbhonally Sidon Less Than sfmfina unless Significant No Impacs Mkigued Impact Impact 411 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? v` �/ (source #(s): b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? ... c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impact to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? .... d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? :`': ... b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped • area or extension of major infrastructure)? MI; pil c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ", ... 3. EARTH AND GEOLOGY. Would the project result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: t a) Fault rupture? ... b) Seismic ground shaking `i si c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? 1 ''°; d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? 71 e) Landslides or mudflows? l f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill? t g) Subsidence of the land? ,., h) Expansive soils? ..... ... 1 411 i) Unique geologic or physical features? ... - r' r• .l Poram.ur Poie.ri i s-pdicant Leis Thu Sip:fiva lidos Sl afioa No Impact Mkigucd Impact Impact • 4. WATER. Would the project result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the / rate and amount of surface runoff? '' fId 1 b) Exposure of people or property to water related / hazards such as flooding? Nffi n ::>>:: c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? .... ..... • e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of / water movements'? ...: f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge / capability? a :: IP g) Altered direction or rate ot.flow of groundwater? la IS !/ h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 1 `{' 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any air quality standard to contribute to an 1 existing or projected air quality violations? i1.1 b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or N cause any '` iaschange in climate? >:t:; `'' - d) Create objectional odors? IN..• .•.• .... fir! III 1 ' ptimailr l) i Pam10 Sigleflcara Ids Ilan Significant Unless Significant No . Imp= Mitigated Impact Impict • 410 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the project result in: V ' •Aa) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? {< b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? . 14; .... c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ..... »n d) Insufficient parking capacity on site or off site? <} M ..... 4 .e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? :Ay f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project result in III impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? ; ; ':fi b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? Iiii c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak V forest, (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? Alii a i];i1... Ill PairsiaBy Spasm tar Them + U C. Apiflorm Wow Milldam ND d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal Pool)? '± 'sue ,.. e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? /1 S. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ;:z, b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? t 9. RISK OF UPSET/HUMAN HEALTH. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? <: b) Possible interference with an emergency response A RI plan or emergency evacuation plan? xn c) The creation of any health h272rd or potential health hazards? .,.. ., 4 :, • d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential w/ health hazards? MI <: e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? ... ..m. .l .n 10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? aii ..,., :.« V( b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? MI lifr 'v 11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? "54/ - - III . Passisisky ' 0 .7 Pornoily Sigificaist Leo Thom s. SIPtficam Unless Sigsrflcass N. Impact Mapped Impact Impact • . b) Police protection? ,i0i V IR M c) Schools? ii3 0 :ivo/ d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? e) Other governmental services? ta V iiiI .7. 12. UTILITIES. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alternations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? b) Communications systems? c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? 111 iiia d) Sewer or septic tanks? 13 7 e) Storm water drainage? • f) Solid waste disposal? 13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? m :m. ti ip V b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? c) Create light or glare? a 8/ 44. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? iiim. MI gi V' b) Disturb archaeological resources? i:EQ .:i*ix• M Mi I:3s c) Affect historical resources? II ill ilill:" V d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? Iik ...... „............. ....- ...,......1..„ e) Restrict existing religious of sacred uses within the potential impact area? . I VC- III ..: Polo ddl, • 0 1� ts.,� • SlpSia Udine Signifies= Pb 15. RECREATION. Would the proposal: • a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks of other recreational facilities? 11 ffl b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? >' lil iiii V MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the Potential to degrade the quality of the environmental, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? l.:A :i.::x b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, M4 to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ID ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects). .}` d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? i',:iii: ... it/ EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed by the earlier document. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "potentially significant" or "potentially significant unless mitigated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. O1 • SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS VTM 28224 PUD 1-95 SUMMARY A proposal to create a 223 lot Single Family Planned Unit Development on approximately 31.5 acres located on the south side of Seventh Street, east of the Ramona Expressway. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS VTM 28224 PUD 1-95 DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS Potential site area impacts related to potential future development, as identified by the Environmental Checklist are as follows: (1 a) Land Use and Planning • No Impact (1 b) Land Use and Planning No Impact The City of San Jacinto has jurisdiction over the proposed project. The primary environmental plans and policies related to development on site are identified in San Jacinto's General Plan and the Master Environmental Assessment for the City. (1 c) Land Use and Planning No Impact No agricultural lands are located on the site. No impact on agricultural resources or operations will result from the proposed project. (Source; Site Survey) (1 d) Land Use and Planning No Impact The project will not disrupt or divide an established community. (2a) Population and Housing No Impact The project will not exceed population projections. -01 ., ti (2b) Population and Housing No Impact 411 The proposal is not anticipated to result in a substantial increase in the demand for new housing in the area. (2c) Population and Housing No Impact The site is currently vacant and will supply additional housing for seniors. (Sources:Site Survey;) (3a) Earth and Geology No Impact None of the faults located in the City of San Jacinto have been placed on or near the proposed site. No part of the site is within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. Thus, no fault rupture hazard is present on site. (Source: State of California Special Studies Zones, San Jacinto Quadrangle) (3b) Earth and Geology No Impact The proposed project site will be subject to some groundshaking hazards from • regional and local earthquake events. (3c) Earth and Geology No Impact The proposed project site is not anticipated to be subject to ground failure hazards from earthquake or other events. (3d) Earth and Geology No Impact The City is located inland from the Pacific Ocean and would not be subjected to a tsunami. (3e) Earth and Geology No Impact The terrain within the project is level and no hazards associated with landslides will occur. (Source: U.S.G.S. San Jacinto 7 1/2 minute quadrangle, Site Survey) • (3f) Earth and Geology No Impact The Site is will have to undergo soils testing prior to commencement of construction. (Site Survey) (3g) Earth and Geology No Impact The site is not located in an area which is considered to have subsidence hazards. (Riverside County General Plan) (3h) Earth and Geology No Impact The site of the proposed project will have to undergo soils testing prior to construction. (Site Review) (3i) Earth and Geology No Impact No unique geologic and physical features are located on or near the project site and • will not be affected by the proposed project. (Sources: U.S.G.S. San Jacinto Quadrangle, Site Plan) (4a) Water Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated FLOOD CONTROL Local drainage is that water that is generated by on-site run off and is carried to the regional system via the streets, ditches, small open drainage channels, and storm drains. Normally, the developer is responsible for the cost of improvement of local drainage. Regional drainage is the cumulative impact of local run off. In San Jacinto, this translates into the implementation of the Regional Master Drainage Plan. To fund the needed improvements to implement the Regional Master Drainage Plan, a flood control mitigation fee has been established and included as Condition of Approval for this project. The proposed site plan for the project indicates that almost all of the facility will be paved except for landscaped areas. This pavement will prevent ground absorption and result in additional storm runoff volumes from the site. The site does not serve as a 411, recharge basin for groundwater resources. (Source: Site Plan; Site Review) (, I • (4b) Water No Impact The site is within the X designated flood hazard area. The X zone includes those areas that are outside the 500 year flood plain. The project site is also outside of the 100- year flood plain. (Source: National Flood Insurance Program Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel Number 065056 0005 D) (4c) Water No Impact There are no bodies of surface water on or adjacent to the project site. (Source: Site Review) (4d) Water Less Than Significant Impact Although an increase in runoff volume will occur, this increase is not expected to be a significant amount of surface water. The size of the project represents a very small portion of the drainage tributary area for the City. (Site Plan; Site Review) • (4e) Water No Impact The City of San Jacinto does not have any substantial bodies of water or rivers. The San Jacinto River is located north of the project site and will handle runoff water from the project and surrounding areas. (4f) Water Less Than Significant The anticipated water consumption will not substantially change the amount of groundwater pumped from local wells. (4g) Water Less Than Significant Impact The proposal will have no groundwater wells on site and there will be no excavation or construction will be involved. Thus, no alteration in the direction or rate of flow of groundwater resources is expected. (Source: Site Plan) i Li • (4h) Water No Impact The project site is will be paved and ground absorption on site will be reduced. The storm runoff on site will be directed to a stormwater channel. A substantial portion of the project will be paved. Liquid contaminates may be deposited on the parking lot from vehicles. Following rain these materials could be transported into a storm channel. (5a) Air Less Than Significant Impact AIR QUALITY All development that induces motor vehicle usage has a negative impact on the air quality. The most immediate method to improve air quality is to participate and encourage car pooling. To implement and encourage car pooling, and thereby mitigate impacts on air quality, the developer will be assessed the car pool mitigation fee. There are no significant pollutants anticipated to result from this proposal There will be some pollutants as a result of vehicular traffic from residents. The Trip Generation • Handbook shows that attached Senior adult housing on a weekday peak hour between 4 and 6 p.m. shows an average of .08 trips generated per occupied dwelling unit per hour. The same figure for the same time on a regular apartment is .63 per dwelling unit. The traffic generated by this project will be significantly less than a non age restricted project of similar size. Trip generated by the proposed development during peak hours (4 to 6p.m.) will be just 12 per hour. (5b) Air Quality No Impact The project itself will be a sensitive receptor. (Site Plan) (5c) Air Quality No Impact The proposal will not be large enough to create changes in air movements. (Site Plan) (5d) Air Quality No Impact The proposed project will not be involved in activities which may create objectionable odors, such as waste hauling or the production of chemicals. • (6a,d,e) Transportation Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated CIRCULATION • Local roadways and intersections are of course, impacted by additional traffic. A lot in a single family subdivision generally averages between 7 and 9 trips per day. Added traffic creates needs for controlled intersections. The major intersections closest to a development are the ones impacted most by the traffic. As other roadway options are available, the impacts geometrically reduce. However, the cumulative impact of all development together may create a need for signalization at intersections farther away from the development first. This development will generate approximately 1,631 to 2,097 trips per day. The streets receiving the greatest amount of this traffic will be Seventh Street and Ramona Expressway. The mitigation fee for traffic signalization is currently $150.00 per unit, to be paid at the time of permit issuance, or as prescribed by Ordinance 1009. There are two regional roads that pass through San Jacinto, Ramona Expressway and Sanderson Avenue. They are regional because they are used to transport people efficiently around the cities to destinations outside the valley. Neither of these streets are constructed to their ultimate and the existing roadways for each are in need of repair. While it may not be appropriate to expect a development contiguous to a regional roadway to finance total construction of the roadway, it is fair to expect that development to pay its fair share. To mitigate the impact on the regional system a mitigation fee will be assessed. Additional development with its added traffic has an impact on existing streets as well, which leads to a breakdown of the streets. Development also adds more street mileage to maintain. The funding sources for road maintenance are essentially the same as those for road construction. To mitigate the impacts of new development on and to ensure continued maintenance of roads, the developer will be assessed a mitigation fee. There will be some pollutants as a result of vehicular traffic from residents but the amount based on Senior attached dwellings in the Trip Generation guide snows that the level will be insignificant. (6b) Transportation/Circulation No Impact The proposed apartments will not include any new roadways or any modifications to existing roadways. (Site Plan) • 1 I • (6c) Transportation/Circulation No Impact The proposal will not obstruct emergency access to the site or surrounding uses. (Source: Project Site Plan) (6f) Transportation/Circulation No Impact (7a) Biological Resources Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated BIOLOGY The property is within the historic range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. Prior to development, a biological report by an acceptable biologist shall be submitted and include a Kangaroo Rat survey. The Site has no endangered or threatened species nor are their habitats located on this site. (Source: Project Site Plan; Site Review) • (7b) Biological Resources • No Impact There are no locally designated biological resources on the project site. (Source:Site Review) (7c) Biological Resources No Impact There are no existing biological resources of local significance on the property. (source: Site Review) (7d) Biological Resources No Impact There are no wetlands, marshes, riparian communities, or vernal pools on the proposed project site. (Source: Site Review) (7e) Biological Resources No Impact There are no known wildlife corridors within this project area. (Source: Site Review; Project Site Plan) • I -. (8a) Energy and Mineral Resources No Impact It is not anticipated that the project will require a significant level of electricity or natural gas to result in the need for new systems or alteration to existing systems. (8b) Energy and Mineral Resources No Impact Very little use of energy will be required. (9a) Risk of Upset/Human Health No Impact The proposed apartments will not be involved in hazardous materials or wastes which could explode or result in fire hazards. (Source: Applicants Environmental Information Form from Application) (9b) Risk of Upset/Human Health No Impact On site operations will not interfere with emergency responses to the site or surrounding areas nor will it obstruct emergency evacuation of the area. (Source: . Proposed Site Plan) (9c) Risk of Upset/Human Health No Impact The proposed project shall comply with all health and safety regulations. (9d) Risk of Upset/Human Health No Impact There are no existing health hazards on site. The proposed apartments are not expected to create any health hazard. The project will be required to conform to all applicable health and safety codes. (Sources: Site Survey) (9e) Risk of Upset/Human Health No Impact There are no flammable brush, grass, or trees on site and the proposed apartments will comply with applicable fire safety codes. The proposed project will not create a fire Hazard. (Source: Site Survey) • ' • (10a and b) Noise Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated With the potential increased intensity of land use, additional noise may be created by the new proposed apartments. This increased noise level will be minimal. NOISE The site's close proximity to Ramona Expressway has the potential to subject those residences which abut the roadway to significant exposure to noise. According to the Circulation Element, at buildout the Ramona Expressway will experience approximately 33,000 vehicle trips a day adjacent to the tract. The high volume of traffic at a high rate of speed will generate noise levels in excess of 65 dba. Therefore, to ensure that exterior noise levels in the rear yards of those homes adjacent to the Expressway do not exceed 65 dba, Staff has conditioned the project to submit a focused noise study prior to approval of a final map for recordation. Such noise study shall evaluate and determine the appropriate mitigation, which may include the provision of earthen berms and dense landscaping, in addition to the required block wall. Noise is defined as unwanted sound. Its effects can range from annoyance and interference to hearing loss and stress-related problems. The General Plan provides the standard for acceptable noise levels for residential developments at 65 decibels for . outdoor living areas and 45 decibels for indoor areas. The noise will not reach these levels. 11.(a,b,e) Public Services Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated PUBLIC SAFETY As more development occurs, it naturally creates a need to expand public safety services. The type of development determines the impact on public services. Typically, police service is impacted to a greater extent than fire service, which is not to minimize fire service impacts. For example, a family apartment project creates more calls for police service than a single family subdivision. This can create an immediate need for an increase in staffing, depending on the size of the project. The increase in number of units creates more potential for fire calls but usually doesn't necessitate the need for increased personnel. However, a senior citizen project will definitely create more calls for fire service than a family development. A larger measure of impact on fire service is response time. ' � In any case, more personnel creates a direct need to have equipment for that personnel. The staffing level San Jacinto is attempting to maintain is 1.3 sworn police per 1000 people. By extension, new development also creates a need to house additional personnel and equipment. Funding sources for the entire police budget, such as property taxes and sales tax are also the funding sources for general governmental services. In San Jacinto, the budget for the Police Department exceeds these revenue sources. The ultimate goal of the San Jacinto Fire Department is to be able to respond to all calls within 5 minutes. As development occurs, farther from the City core, the response time drops. The City currently has one fire station in the center of town. The traditional funding sources for fire services are identical to those for police service. To mitigate the impacts on public safety services, the developer shall create or join a Public Safety Community Facilities District. Fire protection services are provided by the San Jacinto Fire Department located at 180 W. Sixth Street in San Jacinto. Structural fires and fires from other man-made features are the most significant fire threats to the City. The apartments will be sprinklered. Police services are provided by the City of San Jacinto Police Department located at 160 W. Sixth Street in San Jacinto. Police Department comments indicate that the • major problem will be traffic related. PUBLIC FACILITIES Residential development increases demand for public facilities such as libraries, youth centers, senior centers, etc. Some of these facilities are funded from outside sources. There are no standard funding mechanisms for these facilities. Each time a need for a new building is determined, governmental agencies scramble to find a funding source. Examples of funding sources are Community Development Block Grant entitlement funds, bond sales etc. The possible City public facilities that will be needed in the future, as identified by staff, are a youth center, expanded senior citizens center, and police department expansion. To mitigate the impacts of this development of public facilities, a mitigation fee will be assessed. (11 c) Public Service No Impact • SCHOOLS Schools are impacted by residential development. To mitigate the impact of new development on schools, this project shall coordinate with the San Jacinto Unified School District to participate in a financing district to pay for schools. Residents will be limited to residents who are 55 and older. (11 d) Public Services Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated WATER/SEWER Water and sewer are available, however, main line extensions will be required to service the subject development. The project site is currently served by existing infrastructure, including public roadways such as State Street and the Ramona Expressway. The proposed project will not require new or altered government services for the maintenance of roadways and other public facilities. (Source: Site Survey; Proposed Site Plan) (12a) Utilities • No Impact The project will not require a significant level of electricity or natural gas to result in the need for new systems or alterations to existing systems. (12b) Utilities No Impact The project will not result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to communication systems. (12c) Utilities No Impact The project will not result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities. (12d) Utilities Less Than Significant Impact The project will not result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to sewer services or septic tanks. (12e) Utilities Less Than Significant Impact • The project will not result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to storm water drainage systems. (12f) Utilities Less Than Significant Impact The project will not result in a need for new systems, or substantial alteration to solid waste disposal systems. (13a) Aesthetics No Impact (13b) Aesthetics No Impact (13c) Aesthetics No Impacts (14a) Cultural Resources No Impacts No paleontological resources will be disturbed. (14b) Cultural Resources No Impacts No archeological resources will be disturbed. (14c) Cultural Resources No Impacts No historical resources will be affected. (14d) Cultural Resources No Impacts (14e) Cultural Resources No Impacts The project will not restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area. • J`11110 � (15a) Recreation Less Than Significant Impact PARKS Parks are impacted by residential development. The General Plan lists a need of 5 acres of public park per 1000 people. The Subdivision Map Act allows the collection of park fees or the requirement to dedicate and improve a park. The ideal park size for a neighborhood park is somewhere between five and seven acres, which translates into serving 1600-2300 people. The occupancy rate per unit in San Jacinto is about 2.8. Therefore, for every 500-700 dwelling units, there should be at least one neighborhood park. Tract 28224 will consist of 223 units, which will not generate a need for a park by itself. Therefore, to mitigate the impacts of the development on parks, the payment of park fees will be conditioned for. The operation of the apartments will result in approximately 150 new 1 bedroom apartments. These residents are not expected to utilize parks in the area to a level that results in any detectable adverse impact. (Source: Application Materials) (15b) Recreation 1110 No Impacts The proposed project will not replace nor provide a recreational opportunity in the City. The operation of the facility will have no effect on the existing or future recreational opportunities on San Jacinto. (Source: Application Materials; Proposed Site Plan) NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project: Vesting Tentative Tract Map 27648 ; PUD 1-95 Location: South side of Seventh Street, east of the Ramona Expressway Finding: This project will have no significant effect on the environment. Mitigation Measures have been provided. Mitigation Measures: Pay Storm Drain fees or participate in Flood Control financing district; Pay all applicable fees (traffic • signals, schools, park etc. ) ; Pay to establish or to annex to the public safety CFD for public safety; Pay public building mitigation fee; Pay public structure and equipment fee; submit a biological assessment and comply_ with any Kangaroo Rat report; Submit a noise study and comply with appropriate mitigation to ensure exterior noise levels in all rear yards to not exceed 65 dba; incorporate energy conservation techniques; and dust control measures during construction By: September 19 , 1995 BRIAN MC NABB Date Director of Community Development • • STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Duistermars and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development SUBJ: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 28224 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 1-95 DATE: August 9, 1995 Applicant: National Preferred Holding 2081 Business Center Dr. #195 Irvine, CA 92715 (714) 833-8294 DESCRIPTION A proposal to create a 223 lot Single Family Planned Unit Development on approximately 31.5 acres located on the south side of Seventh Street, east of the 4110 Ramona Expressway. EXHIBIT "A" EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT "B" EXISTING ZONING EXHIBIT "C" CURRENT USES EXHIBIT "D" EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT EXHIBIT "E" PROPOSED ZONING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The environmental review identified the following impacts the project has on the City and its services. They are as follows: FLOOD CONTROL Local drainage is that water that is generated by on-site run off and is carried to the regional system via the streets, ditches, small open drainage channels, and storm drains. Normally, the developer is responsible for the cost of improvement of local drainage. TENTATIVE TRACT 28224 AUGUST 9, 1995 Page No. 1 0`'� Regional drainage is the cumulative impact of local run off. In San Jacinto, this translates into the implementation of the Regional Master Drainage Plan. To fund the needed 1111 improvements to implement the Regional Master Drainage Plan, a flood control mitigation fee has been established and included as Condition of Approval for this project. CIRCULATION Local roadways and intersections are of course, impacted by additional traffic. A lot in a single family subdivision generally averages between 7 and 9 trips per day. Added traffic creates needs for controlled intersections. The major intersections closest to a development are the ones impacted most by the traffic. As other roadway options are available, the impacts geometrically reduce. However, the cumulative impact of all development together may create a need for signalization at intersections farther away from the development first. This development will generate approximately 1,631 to 2,097 trips per day. The streets receiving the greatest amount of this traffic will be Seventh Street and Ramona Expressway. The mitigation fee for traffic signalization is currently $150.00 per unit, to be paid at the time of permit issuance, or as prescribed by Ordinance 1009. There are two regional roads that pass through San Jacinto, Ramona Expressway and Sanderson Avenue. They are regional because they are used to transport people efficiently around the cities to destinations outside the valley. Neither of these streets are constructed to their ultimate and the existing roadways for each are in need of repair. While it may not be appropriate to expect a development contiguous to a regional roadway to finance total construction of the roadway, it is fair to expect that development to pay its fair share. To mitigate the impact on the regional system a mitigation fee will be assessed. Additional development with its added traffic has an impact on existing streets as well, which leads to a breakdown of the streets. Development also adds more street mileage to maintain. The funding sources for road maintenance are essentially the same as those for road construction. To mitigate the impacts of new development on and to ensure continued maintenance of roads, the developer will be assessed a mitigation fee. PARKS Parks are impacted by residential development. The General Plan lists a need of 5 acres of public park per 1000 people. The Subdivision Map Act allows the collection of park fees or the requirement to dedicate and improve a park. The ideal park size for a neighborhood park is somewhere between five and seven acres, which translates into serving 1600-2300 people. Pa a No. 2 TENTATIVE TRACT 28224 AUGUST 9, 1995 9 411111 ' 0.77 The occupancy rate per unit in San Jacinto is about 2.8. Therefore, for every 500-700 dwelling units, there should be at least one neighborhood park. Tract 28224 will consist of 223 units, which will not generate a need for a park by itself. Therefore, to mitigate the impacts of the development on parks, the payment of park fees will be conditioned for. PUBLIC SAFETY As more development occurs, it naturally creates a need to expand public safety services. The type of development determines the impact on public services. Typically, police service is impacted to a greater extent than fire service, which is not to minimize fire service impacts. For example, a family apartment project creates more calls for police service than a single family subdivision. This can create an immediate need for an increase in staffing, depending on the size of the project. The increase in number of units creates more potential for fire calls but usually doesn't necessitate the need for increased personnel. However, a senior citizen project will definitely create more calls for fire service than a family development. A larger measure of impact on fire service is response time. In any case, more personnel creates a direct need to have equipment for that personnel. The staffing level San Jacinto is attempting to maintain is 1.3 sworn police per 1000 people. By extension, new development also creates a need to house additional • personnel and equipment. Funding sources for the entire police budget, such as property taxes and sales tax are also the funding sources for general governmental services. In San Jacinto, the budget for the Police Department exceeds these revenue sources. The ultimate goal of the San Jacinto Fire Department is to be able to respond to all calls within 5 minutes. As development occurs, farther from the City core, the response time drops. The City currently has one fire station in the center of town. The traditional funding sources for fire services are identical to those for police service. To mitigate the impacts on public safety services, the developer shall create or join a Public Safety Community Facilities District. AIR QUALITY All development that induces motor vehicle usage has a negative impact on the air quality. The most immediate method to improve air quality is to participate and encourage car pooling. To implement and encourage car pooling, and thereby mitigate impacts on air quality, the developer will be assessed the car pool mitigation fee. 2 4 AUGUST 1995 TENTATIVE TRACT 822 UGUS 9, Page No. 3 SCHOOLS Schools are impacted by residential development. To mitigate the impact of new development on schools, this project shall coordinate with the San Jacinto Unified School District to participate in a financing district to pay for schools. PUBLIC FACILITIES Residential development increases demand for public facilities such as libraries, yettff-i --ems, senior centers, etc. Some of these facilities are funded from outside sources. There are no standard funding mechanisms for these facilities. Each time a need for a new building is determined, governmental agencies scramble to find a funding source. Examples of funding sources are Community Development Block Grant entitlement funds, bond sales etc. The possible City public facilities that will be needed in the future, as identified by staff, are a youth center, expanded senior citizens center, and police department expansion. To mitigate the impacts of this development of public facilities, a mitigation fee will be assessed. BIOLOGY The property is within the historic range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. Prior to development, a biological report by an acceptable biologist shall be submitted and include • a Kangaroo Rat survey. WATER/SEWER Water and sewer are available, however, main line extensions will be required to service the subject development. NOISE The site's close proximity to Ramona Expressway has the potential to subject those residences which abut the roadway to significant exposure to noise. According to the Circulation Element, at buildout the Ramona Expressway will experience approximately 33,000 vehicle trips a day adjacent to the tract. The high volume of traffic at a high rate of speed will generate noise levels in excess of 65 dba. Therefore, to ensure that exterior noise levels in the rear yards of those homes adjacent to the Expressway do not exceed 65 dba, Staff has conditioned the project to submit a focused noise study prior to approval of a final map for recordation. Such noise study shall evaluate and determine the appropriate mitigation, which may include the provision of earthen berms and dense landscaping, in addition to the required block wall. c DISCUSSION The proposed subdivision proposes 4,000 square foot lots for senior citizens. The existing General Plan designation for the subject site is Low and Medium Density Residential. The proposed zoning R-2, (PUD) would conform to the General Plan of the City. The current development plan proposes four different floor plans ranging in area from 1077 square feet to 1632 square feet. The plan also proposes an open-space area encompassing 1.65 acres. The open space area includes a swimming pool, clubhouse, 2 tennis courts, lawn bowling area and a putting green. The proposed improvements are appropriately suited to a senior development. Access to the site is provided on Seventh Street. Emergency ingress/egress points are provided on the Ramona Expressway as shown on Tentative Tract Map 28224. Private streets are proposed for the development, and shall conform to the Public Works standards of the City for construction sections and drainage. Street lights as determined by the Public Works Director shall be provided on all private streets as well. To ensure maintenance of the private streets, the open space areas and the street lights, a Home Owners Association shall be formed. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall be prepared and submitted with sufficient wording to empower the Association to collect fees and enforce all applicable provisions. • The PUD Ordinance requires one recreational vehicle storage space be provided for every ten units. CC&R's should specifically prohibit the storage of recreational vehicles on individual lots within the subdivision. To implement the requirements of the PUD overlay, a storage facility capable of accommodating 25 RV units is proposed at the southerly end of the site. A fence and wall plan shall be submitted. The fence and wall plan shall be consistent with the Fence guidelines and provide a meandering, staggered, or offset decorative block wall along the Ramona Expressway. A perimeter decorative wall shall be required around the subdivision. A decorative block wall shall be required where the rear property line of the lot abuts a public right of way. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 95- recommending the City Council approve Tentative Tract 28224 and the corresponding Development Plan subject to the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval. n � r • FINDINGS OF FACT VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 28224 1. Vesting Tentative Tract 28224, and corresponding Planned Unit Development are consistent with the General Plan, Zoning and applicable schedule of improvements. 2. The density is within the specified General Plan Density designated for the site. 3. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 28224 and corresponding Planned Unit Development, as conditioned, are in substantial compliance with the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances. 4. There are adequate sewer and water facilities to serve the site provided proper extensions are made. 5. The San Jacinto Valley has been known in the past to be a habitat for the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. 6. Vesting Tentative Tract 28224 and corresponding Planned Unit Development will generate an impact upon the school district to provide the necessary facilities. The City and the School District have entered into a Cooperation Agreement which • requires that all new developments participate in a financing district or alternative program to finance educational facilities. This development has been conditioned to mitigate any applicable impact upon the school district. • • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 28224 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 1. Prior to recordation of the final map or as prescribed by Ordinance 1009, the applicant shall pay storm drain fee in effect at time of map recordation. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits or as prescribed by Ordinance 1009, the applicant shall pay traffic signal mitigation fees in effect at time of map recordation. 3. Prior to issuance of building permits or as prescribed by Ordinance 1009, the applicant shall pay park fee in effect at time of building permit issuance. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits or as prescribed by Ordinance 1009, the applicant shall pay regional and local roadway mitigation fee in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 5. Prior to issuance of building permits or as prescribed by Ordinance 1009, the applicant shall pay car pool mitigation fee in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 4110 6. Prior to issuance of building permits or as prescribed by Ordinance 1009, the applicant shall pay fire station mitigation fee in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall pay to establish or to annex to the public safety CFD to mitigate impacts on public safety. 8. Prior to issuance of building permits or as prescribed by Ordinance 1009, the • applicant shall pay public building mitigation fee. 9. Prior to issuance of building permits or as prescribed by Ordinance 1009, the applicant shall pay public structure and equipment mitigation fee. 10. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall submit a biological assessment and comply with any Kangaroo Rat report. 11. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay all school fees and/or participate in the formation and establishment of a community facilities district subject to the terms of the City/School District Cooperation Agreement and/or participate in other satisfactory alternative financing program(s) to finance educational facilities. • • 12. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit a focused • noise study. Such noise study shall evaluate and determine the appropriate mitigation to ensure exterior noise levels in the all rear yards do not exceed 65 dba, which may include the provision of earthen berms, dense landscaping, and the required block wall. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Marbelite street lights or equivalent as determined by the Public Works Director shall be provided on all streets within and adjacent to this project. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, landscape plans shall be submitted for approval. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a street striping and signal plan shall be submitted for approval. 4. Prior to the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy, all lots shall be connected to the sewer system. 5. Prior to the recordation of the final map, grading and public improvement plans shall be submitted. All grading and public improvements shall be installed in • accordance with City Standards and Specifications. 6. Install curbs, gutters, and sidewalks with handicap ramps per City standards and specifications on Seventh Street. a. A full 6 1/2 ft. sidewalk shall be installed along Seventh Street. b. A hydrology study shall be required to determine the appropriate curb height on and off site. c. A 24 inch gutter shall be provided. 7. Private streets shall conform to the Public Works standards of the City for construction sections and drainage. 8. Landscape the Ramona Expressway between the wall and right of way. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for approval. Irrigation system shall be MaxiCom ready with tensiometer. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, typical front yard landscape and automatic watering system plans for all house models shall be submitted. • U3 • 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a fence and wall plan shall be submitted. The fence and wall plan shall be consistent with the Fence guidelines and provide a meandering, staggered, or offset decorative block wall along the Ramona Expressway. A perimeter decorative wall shall be required around the subdivision. A decorative block wall shall be required where the rear property line of the lot • abuts a public right of way. 3. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall pay to join or establish a Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District. 4. All lots shall have a minimum lot width of 24 feet. 5. All applicable development fees effective at the time of the issuance of the building permits, or as prescribed by Ordinance 1009, shall be paid. 7. All new and existing utilities shall be underground. 8. Prior to recordation of the final map, a phasing plan shall be submitted for approval if the subdivision is to be phased. 9 Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall pay to join or establish a Community Facilities District to insure adequate police and fire protection will be • available. 10. Black address numbers on white florescent background shall be painted on the curb. Numbers shall be a minimum 3 inches in height. • 11. Consult with the San Jacinto Post Office regarding the type and placement of the mail boxes. 12. Prior to the issuance of building permits, final drawings consistent with and including the provisions of the tentative map and Planned Unit Development shall be submitted for approval. 13. Prior to the issuance of building permits, Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall be prepared and submitted with sufficient wording to create and empower a Home Owners Association to collect fees and enforce all applicable provisions. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, a Home Owners Association shall be formed. 14. Prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy, an open-space area encompassing 1.65 acres shall be established and constructed, including a swimming pool, clubhouse, two tennis courts, lawn bowling area and a putting green in accordance with the plans submitted to the Planning Commission. S 15. Prior to the issuance of certificates occupancy, a storage facility capable of accommodating 25 RV units shall be constructed at the southerly end of the site. 410 16. Emergency ingress/egress points shall be provided on the Ramona Expressway as required by the Fire Department. 17. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the tentative tract and Final Map application fees for this project must be paid. 18. All units shall be restricted for persons over 55 years of age as outlined in the California Civil Code 51.3 and significant services specifically oriented toward seniors shall be provided. 19. Prior to approval of a final map a traffic study shall be prepared and submitted to the Community Development Department. The findings of the traffic study shall be implemented into the plan. POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. All required traffic signs shall be installed with the approval of the traffic engineer. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATING MONITORING • 1. Developer shall provide a Declaration stating how all significant environmental concerns will be mitigated, prior to the recordation of a final map. 2. Upon the approval of the Declaration, it shall be noticed on the Final Map and recorded simultaneously. 3. Upon the start of construction, at six month intervals, and prior to occupancy the developer shall provide a status report relating to compliance with the mitigating measures. 4. Prior to occupancy, the City shall verify compliance with the mitigating measures. FIRE DEPARTMENT INCORPORATE HEREIN THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST Cot®un ty Cona� rci aT �` 11 . .<-_,)113,. 7;h; -.4 I---C-A11.411)\+. , ... s.. ,.1. 41Vk* \ (4/ _(‘ 41thAt_ 41.A. If+ ) \I\ \ 't7-7A TOMN, -.L. _ . .J. iraruk8.. ." tilt \j`' ,1 \ 44,0y.t.A., .i, . . v\i N Alk-virc 4 \ ) %Iii "4p.-* ,410 44 •V'S.4‘ 44 Irt......T. en .(�• �. '11*1 elte4A 'v9r . AVENUE \ �T7a. �L�r\‘‘ ‘#•ik.fir ► s4% FLDRIDA *WA"' (Ss":411' (.°° aaaprkaX 7 4_ 01_-..itA, ..... / k,,,,,k \-Ivii=A:°' • a..4-..'a "F\VA:ti. S ';FOIPP,4 "6/17Z)4 -7:4 . CI' ',740.9 Ik410‘S 43,% : '..-. . .-. CI i\TV Ov 1 4 ffr*#44 4-4 ..,4 -A N 14 ., . . ' ► *Pa\.� s44N. - • yam tko... ,A),,,plo .4,1";,,., c.•..., \s"to,40,4brzt044,"-1 / *fPrr • 40 .4,Vic4 lift\ • /N, 1, **,:. (4170._, ,Avt•>,:vA, , 11 Low Density Residential. 4N411t, ':,A\ 4 :tplic. . . ' / , ,,41;:teliv,,s • . 1 \., „6.4•44,. .t1 .. L. ,.444r,44•A).„v. 4# :. . N4-14 0 .. • $q.f, Ni(.1zSip te:&\4N N W441 li 14 p' '71 1". )s 4,1:01\P41*0e. 1\., . ' :N.dir#4.. , EXHIBIT "A" N- - EXISTING GENERAL PLAN Coniauni ty Conmerci al • (. ?-;: • •,s, - aim ' C-I, Conner�ci aI • ^{ ,...---;-1----2-4:_isliE,X,• \ ( "VIN, 22.11/ \ c,/7t, .4 .+P - . - • • ' 17: rzwitimAieti.,. es .-„,, \,\,..,„_ -\\ .7,,, . „i ,. .„ „.........„. . ,.,,,,,,.. _ . \\\,) \ vpiY.,*. 4, , ,, , • ,._,.. .... . 410,t ..„ V: IT 'S►`*.� '.....i ,, WA** W t A 410 ~v'l 1 Au A \ � 7M\_ if,w4v41r y SRUA o1 god `�jV �-• 3144" AREA MAP: \\;," 76.7.", N414fr ikv 1441* as - # ¶ I ' ` • W-Z; Contro.l l ed Development %pia% vv9 „, ., , .4,, .1):e, k, , • C-1, Commercial N1,1044110NOK. / .' 4 'AS # '. '*%.\\\ (//, /44,411,4•4.. ..141ka.. ' * . /NINk*,41.41;..e.4..;ditylitko„:14"\r:.. . • . 'A44 . , • )IV "N*.,4,,,A, , L. ,(isN7s - s;.4#40N-. 4‘?"b,4.5 11APIWI' C-2, Commercial* . '3 9f EXHIBIT "8" EXISTING ZONING R-1, Single Family • Vacant ' r '� 411 \\19\/1-3 \VV. - ' 14: -- diem ::11 -o.c,../.... -- \ .1.1\ \\1014 % 4rS$ a -444: --- \'0—Ilk*"s?*%;40R4, .0* :1— • — lai .0 \ (Vb CV% .V; 'tr• < 'IT* 0 -- *---Aft„-'ff- 11KV.pPit At• s° gassediX . 1/4 . • 14'• ;1111116e."7'', 43._ s VQ • 49. AREA MAP: \ - .A. #4.01-4-\‘V ' - $fr, \ sot; N. 4,is*" \V :t1 $ '11.. / '.., ‘4 -9- / .. • 10,.4....$4,4N N/ • +44-9;104014"414. <11,. \ , \ +444k frt yr. . / . -4. .4•Ve.44 .,..vr.).\\. ,40, -.V-i*V • 1 • 'tip 77,4A .N • -., ,(\ '�► '�.4' N\titt).7/4P.,447- 1 Vacant ‘0410. -.A I klih 1%. y`•;� ; r . \dc,‘ 'Ss, ..,\ . . .,- .....c!..... .- ,. \4S1414. 414.14P4.4, \.-% EXHIBIT "C" ``, CURRENT USES 10 is, ..... 803 • vnsrr - ,c. , r.,. - - T -i--7,._ , ‘\*..\\*... ,,, ,., • • , \\ ,7 •,,_ . ,74,,....„,„ ..i, . .. , ,,:is,c.„ ., 2 AI . ' - - .1 1.101111". 4rf* ...Z ; wigs -.':. '''t. 4101- j 1 \ 1V . "' �Q►vim \ \.) A rilt46 1,-:. ,A. . \ VI • 11>idp. 'f5+1. ..-,t. .„..,,,,...-; vto. 9 AYEM� 4 ♦�+� ��'�� o° ....ter �� / � , 7 rn • �� • w~""" > �. - AREA MAP: . $\70 A b,*--wk\ ir), to '9640 *ilk x...4, Ar,A4),,,,,,,,.„..4, • . 0. / ' ''4'.4: IVTAS?Ilt. ,i, '''''i. Cia I. Xt. ***4 441:4U\V"\ .9 co .4.‘1 44 it4 tt - .4%44 tio‘!4 tV 4. / 4%L'Ipt 60.4+,4‘403\ 1 Ni$ ..44,V4itf1P—t • 4 4 ‘‘bi 4:‘ 4*.;-4*.' 11‘°1 01"1.‘ . , &t40;40:7- 0 Vi / VP*4; t :,,\,,, .t,44 4;,g... \\.,.,. ., • , , , L. -,, • ,to. - 4' -'''. ' t's:VrOtt. '1, yitS\‘..\4 4 A.,). 'wdighllo 4010) . ,N 7,44,4 1,4*.‘4244,44 Ito:1.‘? EXHIBIT "D" '"~ EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT �� * BEING CONSTRUCTED TO SECONDARY HIGHWAY STANDARDS 0 , Yam, • *11114 VALAN T - - ,,, .0 .tt,„ At.- * - \ \ ` \ 1 �0\� �QE/fR ''. \ e l&IP • \‘ \ w \.8 'At a 1 s a it....ligi ..c ,44x - i7 �• FLORIDA AVENUE 'Viipv vg:• 82110AV '.. MA as.1.11' �� AREA MAP: - \c/4f14fr. Pik4 0 .----- 6, it, 10111., / \-11 rr.V444,A I 1;#sa*.* . / 0 it* i OW1 Ofkr* '-.. \• / # A1141741,"it*. \ --.. \ A.i.., 400:„TW ..1410 oltik.Mr 0 4. ' •V, 40, . R-2, PUD4t4t,/ .aL I.Nit,o I /1 11011: ,•..1 IA filP FP I OP • '•,..,,\ /Y°4)A...'..4 1 I 040 . CU.s.:\slip. ZAWF"4,...4 .4&:' ... \ ift;071 IMP '' /_ ailiNO 'wilt\--, - • Ir6.4;.-&&1111*A" 'IA <-- '..-::--- alt#1.401 0 / 4-4"1, .i, V Air, idi, ,••1 ' / ft,740 ' '- A 4i1\ dot . i i --,..., / V. Ai& . 1 . 4 iki - \ i - '. A.044* .. EXHIBIT "E" ' ,46V- PROPOSED ZONING \' /Nor, N i\V# 417:41& • I j\ _wa►. . . . . irivoter..... .... 0Ib.. lb as as... - i/wain.wwww...!•rMMolise.. .AIMMf/waifwnffw:- ri —rlaMrf - • - i0r/YMffMI000NY0Yab.•rllSIAI�\� !S .. ...d/m//M■MffMmaY■YYIsYIIrfi•=mY■■Mray. • . • • ci. I 1- 1 = a d a O. MI. PLAN ONE Elevation A i -.PliiilliW.; . ''''", —1._ "Alf 0.1 140 'AAAMMM011 ."11!u!!0._. . . \\ ;\..':\\\\ \‘\..\ - -. . . .1.1. M MOO lisi 0 ... c..._- -.,.n .i.iri 0 .. , • r..,02,—,,,.. , . __4. • - , .. - Se _"L., MUM ©N Elevation ONE B v xv , _ - ' , J •e.-_ ~ A�..- l : if•. .•.i:.w�fa.r....11MINfIIMi - 38 i :V. ‘.. I . . . 1 ifErn'i=i . �:; _T y .! itig vas is c P AfJ ONE • Elevation C 1 • rahl."`N IW.........1 - :1 l _ ' won= 6 II 'tea- I , • .; L �, . � 711 ,_ ,�� --- •± 1ik ••--- 41. �•� . ' I I. 0 1 .r.wr�nnn t rwn g C'TH 2 ` „<■uwi HALL di P hili 0 ' ' ,�- � O i -L- i t-•.3 ■ • It. II . J� ,. GARAGE ... 11 0 I• 11140 , 4 r, , • ......, ,....._ . . . .. I. .- • • • . . . . . I • • ipLam ©wIIE, Floor Plan 1077 S.F. LJV. 456 S.F. GAR. 11 'S- I ) is k A f 1) * • . ,•• ... .•at.t I1 ,...1iE1.ii11iN11i.a1..lOi"n•S11'.'' k Nl..IiblOe : . 1 iii . i• i • i n : r : : : t 1 I Imo. 1: . muIV ) .' • itiv . 1 ::t...iii * 1PJlor _.. .. %I. maws eels 1 ONION , Inialqiiiiv.7f! ,„ I ' BM& 111111e 1 • • • IttiVia, ,. 0 asimills :flint I !* MM. • • /1.11t7N•Sa • • smisi 'Jill, alVIVANi 4 • • ................ , . iii.si ::1 :WV •,1 • ,\ ,t• Iglogaii .liki.:1111.1111 111021111111111 AL,• Erma"' `. , ill ;\ s\. • s.:,', ‘., \k,‘ . II il_Plal 1 \. : -. .\• 11 amm. ss . . , Bil • ',__ Ilbli A.m.:. 03:11 . • or IW'ist., . istrolort tri —7—. ... .. :, Iiiiiiilitib:414.11 El': IIIIII. : .. .ii '.• litigilli. ., 1; .• . I=1.\,,•:. 111011512101111111 Ills . : s% \s.• 11111:11:111:11:or 1 I , , Illil emir, • / • ION 11114 . \• 1 ‘ l'iliqrst egisil, • t 1 -11se 15. IsIII Ip SSiIoold Ik i-1,sl yc, • , t, 1 A . n •1• l7 ' ligl 0 . of*ii. • • .• i 0 0 \ IN f'.1 ,- k• . . 1• ' :. 14. , 0 i . • ' illi-- -... .\ lir . .mjrk . „. . . •• .•-• , _,/j # 0 • .: . 1 ,if . ‘i i •; Ar.:4;4%.„,,?reimrt‘"3".' .‘i(. ' —"------4 ,„,,, u • ,.. I kl-- . / • , it%. • • 0. . 1 qiiii .•• • sit , 1 1 • 4 ' 0'I • . . .. . I' ..„ 1:,::r"""' _ lu. i r 1'4" Iliad I ' • . . v. r 1 . • •'� I _———_— _i MIL BEM/2 41 1 !gill ; I►. 1= I -i [:•:: gilli , • ►l�� I i - i A 4 IRla it GARAGE , I0 0 a iglu- ..,_.... , . lt- l• PL A,NIOO Floor Plan Ao.N:1/4'-1-0" 1448 S.F. UV. 480 S.F. GAR. • iLI II?", • i . ....„../. ... i--....... .... siii,,, . Diu_•• , , if PUR1 MIME Elevation A • • • 11101.100 ..�•/� • Aro ..iwsiwaliilliiinii�!�w1�fAw/�`:.rIW/j • am,; ./le%i.5/. g:-j4/::.,, -i1s:ng .-. r I ' ,,1. 1__.-.-:. ‘ Cil ->-• • ILL!L1.-, . J„~1 r� A N TWEE Elevation B ' ice-- ; e 't" . � �� , .. .r��/�N1.1.� v • i��t�0 l N��.1rc �`j �w0rr.� NNIMMtIO� .s.sr.aw.��waiiT �se -. .iw .■..w■ w� • iw •r. lr I ■.wr..•.-- .c:_•.• „, d.c ,• errs►. i! �.�• . •fil ELI ElE11710 • UT:1E1E 11]C. ... Lai .. „,.....[-,-4-2------1 _ ..._. ,..... , _ _ __,..._ ,.., MAN IFIHNIE-1E Elevation C • • C." ' 1 I 1 t 1.11.,..,,/,' 0 aisams Oka\ misams .nslel lfli.n r�l ,::: 90(111:W) f► , iril1 i .:1 db ► =A--1-- • 4 iiiiiiia ; , ' � 1.1 4 114 ilri ..... 1 ,, 1111 I -• urn I- ,IC II ► 1 l 1 I1 I x----t ' Ma I I ►I Etii KITCHEN I •V . A 1 , 116. --- s A o _ '11- I emICIPAInlownirre (iammilm APO •_ GARAGE PIIMINII 1 iposi_ I< IMILIIIMISIUMMIlIR IIMInalaM11111111111111 jig IIMMITIIIII ---7 .. - . I PLAN 71 PrilNIE[E, Floor Plascirdopr.rn 1488 S.F. UV. 420 S.F. GAR. • , l\ : I 4 4. t • �.wwuos.11lsss.r.......se._ v, ...qmsessamerairasameessumnpi- vi, DEID1IDfl 1 000 : 00 'I ■ mil■■ ■r'• = ■ r - " 4141Si'=#r,- — ,,# - io* A NA, ..401111•00011110.. lip Mk ...apiaeamkeedoiihaess.., . , L---zillet 1•010•1114hpiluili tr :.. __ �!IA�•!IMM1!1!MM1MM�,k" �IAw.r�lrMr•��!�r_ ..., .... ,....,.., . • �r� ■ • I . tlat . .z ;.. -�-- ,. - ,� - - - . • pl AN FOUR Elevation B f- ..:�._ r�ssIMIMM..� t • �� r11111.Ms1111sw11111st.1.111.11.... _s::. ��Y/�MM■MlimMiI s1r1rt.1rr�arIIII- s�.wisw_ I;;�nwil0/rirs.rsa.Mtl■�■V..w... �1�-waaiwww�.., • '. 7 ; swlel■O1laa.sss.. .ssss•i� :yi/rwrY1M srsMwsc germ•.rrrrrM_ , • -rill_ or 1111 _ 1■ O �� in • f Pi4;N [FOUR Be, C • 0 . C' /v_j11T. _ vamp- 11111111111111111 foi ...... 4.1.,_ ...... ,_ _ ___ ,__. will11111111 • rc (r) 4' IMMO NOM -10 ------ "--1 WOW OA1N 1 1 - a rr... A' -- -- ''' ...IP _. ri /4- !, 3.. . 41L 1,.. , ...,i pm itawit ,_ 1114 I - NALL 1 eTcHEN • ��. 1 a vi 1 E� t! 1 WORMZ I i Am Ihi i cessia Alb. • II iii-iiii_ 11 iN; 111 . Ilk . :;..4.4 4-7 riii Poi BIM II a igl ---- PLAR FOUR Floor Plan 1632 S.F. LN. • 431 S.F. GAR. 1 H 4 +- i 1110 MUM MN IC ' - .:: •-... -,.. PI r , •.-,., ,, , i ..„„.# \ • NMI 111 I 1 ...1 i I..... \ > c j,,. fss a 11111411111=1* / 1.\\ ...,...., arif . 9. 0 110111101 MAIM MR �'-�4i1lyUO0 UA..E1:0311 — NAM WWI .18On1 OW • ';1 .i.,. . r _ ..ice.. `5 ••.' .i. ' ' coif. lit ' r4il�M0r4•►0I10••r.a111.110•0110000�0•M.+�•11M.., +'•. Av 1�1�IIeIiIirII�ArA .A•.�., loi ` wii�4lw140000!.444444 ....♦♦r/Arrt11♦MMitasom,. r/r1... V i w.INlA::A:AAAl:t2,1p: •' ....11 1♦MM0000ii.•.:1140 110014200,... Wr.. ./....K: Wall: \. .. . .-*_ _A_ DMA 3g • Mp11p3.•♦♦O013710 .Y E r 0 • ' in 51 ---0- ,q I. I W „C ��' • lj_ I III 01 .:?;119'lel r S Oi;,4 e°z5V)IliiiiiWr.tsiP VI' b j Miniii -a:: LI 'Li ---7"-k., '. % 1 1 Iii!.O r4- • �If J ii PI; r talliab 111 li NIA "la- . _4‘ L$ •F� '� �S t : o ,. - .. I iln ril 04,k eiu.dit - .0 _ I MI 1 - '14;-:`'s..11-4‘ Ir- "'1% t mplidi ;... ,_,I _1 ! -,..: AB 5 ! ' 41 p�� •s� fit' f © - : • o I' 1-101-11 tam.agel 01-Witt brialal:61- 'nrir 0 I • Ill 1 . . rigiP ,w 4,th I oil tig ., in 7.. . , . 11: h , 2 ' , 111114.111 .....-- 1 *.iktogi3/4140V11111112"---120 1 FiTridifirtpd, z • ,g.: • IN. EU litpfili *I 21 110 tl ill pm*, ii...1 ,„ m IC ... t4i14 $1 „_, ,,,,,,,r •: ,.. . . tip. FjII ? gil - , • 1-Q1Fel Orbipit ..aniiii: _. . ( w � J I" •ate PIPiN !iPiP1 -Q .!:". (I: • .• 211 i-j Nrilili ILI WI ran a El tr I .3; - f ! 'ir 7: i --f'-'11. 1 1—* i 2 'i tat w.rditev- iii-p.1- ,.. " 0 ', r• '• .. ICE I . . ,_ i -4 )11 .- 1 - • Ell 1111i..2. j ul___ . . a 1 . . 11-1 (j..- I q." 1 1E I • - N I. i inli ' o I e �Y I L i= Y .ti ..-: 011I 1 2g ':. IL If, .II.. � I 21 . 0 ' • 1, / I fillet 1111111i1111111111 !1 fl11 i 11111 S Amai 0 i ,., / 1...11 ii 1q l'' '' r7)1,4, , : I , i i W d �� '$ I �`. 1. 1 hi Ih1h1iiI1f1itih k11 11 lid I 11111 F ��• � _ 40.1a ■t s\ � i• . U-ice ,� — 1 UI �- _ g . I f C i.,ftv 2 pa I rn O STMET0, r , 1 \9": — --5 --- , 1 ; ... 0 Y I O V r w • 1• .,. ,i® t___. . , : , : ... i , is3 t , , . : u M �• I 1 1 l [ I .� — Y f M •.w • Mil gra ' • \ .........-- Amu .....: . ,,,, . ,. ,, ,,, evp. s NM J 4 il • Z -- it• A r 3 ,li "il 1 ' Iw P °1 1 ST11![T p 4 aL •� . a w 1 .. M f 410.1- L r , . , \ \. Fe il y 0 .1, \ 1 .. • '�ti[,,• J p111EET r y F .. r pl ' g , ©1. g 1.: ® , § ` . © '1 - 1 1 .TA K STTTTT F ® L ', u c r r :zit.. \ . 1`tw g 1 - it- U.'' I; � ? ,11 y ,'1 s 1 _ 1 ‘ :.14.4 / 0 ^d L STREET /• / Ablik • \ , 'e ' i i • • * Nib, .3 • • )...a,4,. • ' ,----- :,,i:,.. ...,... .. , ., .. ., f• it - t ' • 'r is..., r,‘ . • .. f` 1 Oil . O r . i !UM . • i',. .4 ‘,..... :it .J I1. I . . ' r r``.'f. do . _ - - ;!..4.4 0110 " 1 is . 1 W :. 1 .•-• - , • M ; a. • O ,1 W _--. > W CI i ' t • AGENDA ITEM NO. tC ags CITY OF SAN JACINTO STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: September 19, 1995 SUBJECT: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCES 975 AND 976 ELIMINATING THE REQUIREMENT FOR FIRE SPRINKLERS IN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES LOCATED WITHIN APPROXIMATELY ONE AND ONE- HALF MILE RADIUS FROM A FIRE STATION. RECOMMENDATION Introduce the proposed ordinance, incorporating Exhibit "B" of this staff report as Exhibit • "A" of the ordinance. BACKGROUND At its September 5, 1995 meeting, the Council directed staff to amend the appropriate ordinances, which would result in the deletion of the requirement to fire sprinkler single family homes if said homes are within a one and one-half mile radius of a fire station providing fire protection to the City. Exhibit "A" depicts these radii. Furthermore, any development split by the edge of the circle around the Fire Department was to have fire sprinklers. Staff has also included for Council consideration, a possible alternative to Exhibit "A", based on both a rational driving distance approach as well as an attempt to use streets as a boundary. A problem using a radius as the sole determent is that it doesn't consider the distance a fire truck must travel to get to the perimeter of its circle. For example, the Little Lake Station's circle intersects with Park Avenue near the westerly boundary of the Park Hill Collection. However, to get to this location, a fire truck would travel approximately .97 miles from the intersection of Park Avenue and Meridian Street. The distance along Meridian Avenue to its intersection with Esplanade is approximately .95 miles. Yet a house at Meridian and Esplanade must have fire sprinklers while the house on the north • side of Park Avenue wouldn't be required to have sprinklers. Secondly, for the purpose of determining who needs fire sprinklers and who doesn't, it • is better to have a distinct boundary to avoid potential debate over whether or not a property is within one and one-half mile of a station. For the reasons mentioned above, staff is recommending the Council consider Exhibit "B" as the map attached to the ordinance. It takes into account both driving distance from a station and creates a distinct boundary that should be clear to all. BKM:Ir CCRPT-95\Ord975-6 • • • ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE 975 AND ORDINANCE 976 PERTAINING TO THE INSTALLATION OF FIRE SPRINKLERS IN ALL OCCUPANCIES OUTSIDE OF A DESIGNATED AREA. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS on January 19, 1993, Ordinance 975 and Ordinance 976 were adopted requiring fire sprinklers to be installed in all new construction. WHEREAS Ordinances 975 and 976 contain Findings of Fact justifying modification to the State Building Standards which do not require fire sprinklers in single family residential structures. WHEREAS since January 19, 1993, the City of San Jacinto has contracted with the Riverside County Fire Department, which expands the City's fire fighting resources. • WHEREAS the City Council upon consultation with the Fire Department has determined adequate fire protection can be provided to single family residents within the equivalent of a one and one-half mile radius of a fire station. THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 3(f) of Ordinance 975 and Section 5(f) of Ordinance 976 are each deleted and replaced as follows: At the present time the City of San Jacinto has' contracted for fire protection with Riverside County, Flash over in new construction may happen in as little as four minutes. Single family residents within approximately one and one-half mile of a City or County fire station should''allow first response prior to most flash overs. Section 2. Ordinance 975 Section 5(F)(b), and Ordinance 976 Section 12, related to Uniform Fire Code Section 10.507(b) are amended as follows: Exceptions: 1. Group M occupancies which are detached, do not exceed 500 square feet of total fire area and are located a minimum • of ten (10) feet from adjacent buildings and five (5) feet from property lines. 2. Group R-3, Singiefamily homes only, located ten (10} feet from adjacent buildings and five feet from property lines# and geographically located within the area highlighted i Exhibit "A". Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 19th day of September, 1995. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1995, by the following vote. - Si-d)11 T �U AYES: 5 l' , NOES: I i •�I� ��ro, a c S 71.1 0 I . . ko,^—f ABSENT: 0, sP. P /1 ha ° f �e t - G° �� ATTEST Mayor Deputy City Clerk • CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the th day of , 1995. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of Deputy City Clerk -4 • - --- -- - , EXHIBIT "A" I _i 1 I State High" , :1' - Arterial Rea 1 • ..* I Max"-Collet I 79 N"• •.\\*.... N Secondary C \oh . Local ROad Record Rd ' - - City Bounde , _ — i ....,..---- 4s // + // ..... i..1 .•-• ' I Park ar a 1 Cikee,......-_ - • . C11 // VI \-.....„..••.... ..., I C IsekC Area I 77-- -- It r/ i ,--- -1 i \,. ,,,, co,, ,,,, 1.• ,, _I il, tt. " 6 1;-5-`0,,Irldr"^"44-MY - \\N COUNTY Chamber of. No c ;4 : = 5i;,, 1,1 'lfilaa..Li.ge.Re 2 ..EN'‘.' + ' . •, js ,, ! - . ;.: -' = — - 6 O o ... ....... .......„ . ----''',.(d v•-i•ol :6.'3'...1.=;3 4 .1 I 7-, t. 4, .../4:4/..TropeS :C,,A ,I1 „,..__Y.4- II- - --0 I .i.e 4, $ ).;••.., \.,,„ 4, ' 4 Tar=krtls__Cram.u .47. > 2 t's 1M • 1000 2000 FEET 4.1..- ' f .4)0.4-- .---.....0, r MT SA •TALTINTeil. •,.. u ' C•,,,c E •LLEGE ,y. / I „a' --.,:`"7.... , 'er - ',-, 74 '" 0 ,-,...,0,- ' ,.' '"*"....;:e. • 4.0` -11%, .:•-, ,‘T4,F,Lt_, -' r•:-:--%- 4.1-6 .. 5772 DIU 2.5 ' ;...rit,•A',.. -,..s *0-,.e. ,,,p,• . unity c.oil*Dr , ,:il-„, ‘` `-' ' ,, cp,t/. .,..° s• . ,,,,t ,7, ,P;,- 4 r--7...-- ";!!.' ; • r.,ego•-•;'.... ! '",-_°-" ,..7'..'.74-.t•i•I'-'7'*7°".i. a'_ IS" , 04 1 ..o. . , - - N `;* ; t., ..,.• 4.' ,' . . '• ...ell = ... Mr9it1 St‘O‘' 1 • '• ..., /i\ / '40 ,1 \ 4 Can ere•FA= .6'241 \. / TO >K/1:: p 14...,. h-,/le" •• x , . . • r _. • :„. %c...00-1-; i - - - '-` ,\,,...4 . ''_•,.0,7' ,,,-,, • L f , 4, V, -••• ;er); , to 1 0 VW*r : 4.. '.).0' t, - .••C ,Z4 '' ''Pi 7 v,• " • 'S 6 I C • •k . •''';',Iiitl• ‘ I ---i 1 So , 0171 .4 , „ ,„?.."• nO., \'4,\ 111111k,11,11i1 F. 411*-kl, ' • 1 , , 1 , e 4s,` • /h.', ,..ed.r.. '' "-> ••,.. - __1_ : 1 t. ..,.. .,,,,,-...,, -;•- '`.-?rc 4 • "-. - \. 4,,,,, , • rt) A.l.9*, AV,'r. . Milk '-'-'-- - _ ,,.. 0,' ,,-, ..4., ..... '1 WV. 7.7.., 711C ;•ir':, .1, .,, ,,,,, . sr,i esuelie ,,,,,f ,t e.„, VI i -.A. t 41, 4',-.."-. •••, / t-,,,_%„:"',,, `'.-- •„,,,,f 4_..w.f.-..--, s .. V , .;,,.. it/ c i Polk,St I C, ' I WI ...-. ,V.C,'"*Q;1-,,,,. 4.‘6% '-'-. — 30d 1;1 Av gottonwocd ', A . AO. SI,,,'' i S.,., '' 0 L. 0,. ; 1 ',1"'-''• le•n"a' '-' -.7 't..0. ' 4;• '' • .re 5 t / no '0,11 41' C1,4 Q-' .,1 r 4 :` 517 ,, ':':' 1, c ' ..1;10.I/i' ,,r. lif - \.,.:6 'C.°4%,10,,,.,,,, / ' t . • i.i,i..,4--PtH ,..,,,,,,...H..,.:, ,,.„,...,.:„.. .4.,, ..1' "it '.. -EusV21-•-•,, cs,F.1", c j s ..1„.. rir.es,rinr,!' Stgi 1 - --"-- .- Ill SOBOBA / ••••• _._ •, %\ SPRING S.,.,7 1, Ur f C X St fr. ,,.' i 7. 9 .2 I. E VI 's. '''' - '" • •.: ? ‘ ,,,; E I E i \ "V - 143f1MIt, i 1- . . ... 2 •venth tii :n_ — .r - r.' ' - C•`' ''' .5evatith' ; > 45... ''I,,:,3 I II 1 St A i UMW- .?;,.' 1 :'. .64 -,..: 4 --•1 —• Fril 7\- --7\ i'7.'‘4 57,977i /- -----i-i t''''7V4-•-'7 SA 4 _ Cr ystne 4 4 . _ .5, i 1 \ E 's .; 3 > tf' ij . , Eve'a 3,I • st ::-C ,AILLIFS INDS es .- IMPOIOISSIL, • > ite...a.".,,--, rt \ ,:; ' . ; .,..:i,se' ,. , 0 .1,44,,,iv :i I _L.. ,..- ,d .r,z 4-,,,, N planade C • *Z.:•' •-:-• 03 Espien&ae,„ -2 q4 - PO , , ..r .,-.. - . .::: ..-11.., 1,o,.. \'‘Tl•\/.Cb iN -I -o , ,,, - 1 • .1 '14.• 4., \41•‘ ,, , C., 1/4 4. ...,••• E i - , z: ! : `•1 •- ..*; • - f. ' •. • I h Ay i 4 COMMONYMA,Ith A 1 . Esplanade P (;:$45,77/M04/ -.. eir' ,,- -• , 17/7 .._, , ...41 C11,11 _6•LMIt , !. "RIO• EJM,Y=212-i. iil 0 1.1 . ` ; ,- ---"---.57477 Dr-41 2 .,,•'''.,,.et"*.:`,-,'"\'‘::•5;'\ 1' , I .... ' 3 7 lit ecknerE1St >, •S ' '-•••-., • 4 -- ••••.kompo ,,,,,, \\ J 'i rillg i 1, 1 r''''''''''i ill -. . . , 4.44/5 •" • ----- . 2 Le..i...,_4•,.•C'X'<,•;•.% L.2....2-...,2; ' ".. - •n Ay n i 16.''' '- i - al r- --•-- ''''' Y;•02. iii _• . 2' ..2,-C-,, _ I ,1) • • I . ', !I S i ' t • I , _ . > • . • L _ ,:.,:_, . it..., .... , , , '10211..i III . ' I :.1.- . . > , .• 2, 3. : 7Si etaLLS, *ge °` Marv., 1 : : . . • 5 4 Fa ra..._!, 0% • 1;'j, Av t '' ' ....., f411; ' ! ' ' • '''.. . .11 Ay tt/ Menlo I.''''41 ,,,A,,o_Lfiomf./ ...lotto_ • 2;164 _.,_ NI -6.---° - .' -6 I ,.,61Craecesp •1114 k ' ..7 lkit evr• r,,,, .- •• . r ae.;••••- '. .....i&- ti i l' 11/11§11 ••:-,1:• 2 ; ''' 1 1"' - -4 " r 10• .-wi • :. . , . .. 0 7—!-.3.1..s.i. .13 -, .!,, ...., ,,,...,„k. • ,..---‘ -____ _.,-----, . i MHP 1•1 - _ ' till 41.' ti Carom..7,0 r . Liu •• E, ..• H MET 1 , c c :. .---. .. ... , 3 ;MI • 13 Pa I ' Av • ,. 9 PP_ __i'i tli ' 1 '\ Z ; " I xleidinarn i a pkv 1.1 „ ! 4 oIl 1— 19•1: gisii__I HI il 2 il 1 1 i . ,f tm,L, L:-.--- -- . , w 79 .e. .1,'w • • 7• 1...,.•V • •L . • 10 •a .. ,, C , r a — B C D E F G • . . . '- - • . . - . . • . . . .. . . . L • ; ,. ...11 • 1 ---1 • . , i ..--il IL ,L_ . . „: 1. 1,. . 11 r .. • i • , , ,, . ••••••i, ___H____I_________ ,....,.,,,,,,,, ., .\ _,:,±-,_Lyli r-A4t? r ),‘,..."1 . ,.„, i - . ,vso, .,.., . /./ 7,.. _.., •.. 413) , , ,........„___.„ k---/ __----; ,.„_.3.. ....... iiffr. 7-------'------------ ' . . , i . . .. 1 ....' i i F-J.7j-JR. I ,. -• ./, 1 ril---7.... 1 I \.. 1 '_.......L,...._ .\1 0 I I —.41lb ‘.) :•ii 1 lia_DOLRPLJ :H.. -11----fi 1= ---.:- - A. 1 -- ---. --inc--IT - J.__ IL__ I 1' -- —— ' - -- • -----1 r----u---- / i :, 1.11 LODI OLii 1- ,,_,..,4 •'.- ---- I . ..4"7,:a. ^ L._1011 LOD i /., , ...-,z—— ' K\fs\)111 FA EEE Ti 1 t 1 'ii AFT--1 1-1 1 In 1 '7\ • 1 7:__N__I 1._i_il I , IF • 1 . .____ -----1"----" 1 - -" " [ • i 1.118"1.111M114--11: ----' ] \, > .s4P:Iiii;II > . . Lqi.0 i ii..._,.__—,... 4_ 'ff--: - A FL iL ' il i I.___1 ;:s. , I! I III _______, > , I 11 I ' ' 0 , .. ... I I I I I L 1 I I! I I ' •''' 1 I" — )1, I - An 1I9IHXA \\ - _I_ It State Mlahw I I •\7- { 4. Arterial Rea 1 t.`.. -bob. I I Major ColleC ‘' I N I Secondary C I 79 R °' I City Bounds •�''° I Placard Rd I— _ _ _ �+ .� 1r4ST'M/.. I Park Area F�, // H C. I �� \ I Civic Area u/ ;; s'1'y i// u" m V'Oita rn sera �\� COufrr Chamber of C ...,.. ... , 6/ Tveio�[�y, _L »I =i' >- - 4t C'41f• 1000 2000 FEET 4, I � �O'' \ P, s n ar tpL ML SA .IAE!rREDE \\` ,.. L'. M = e's-A` •J. -..�K LLEGE o / . ,�� ' •r ip'=''° _[..a - 4ir' 57727 /U 2, Q •,, t`r O y '...f. Dr - r 4 .tom /.. I ter\ ,A ^, j+ .. Q • �. i / \. ' r1 / > 44 \ o� rI� — — I D 'Arivoll 4 ... - /AN s .5 •,.. -4A,-,::::4,..it",, ,a ,.... ..,,,, , --- livi ' ,.,,-,.-:::. s ', _ _ •• • _,,,,.. ... . . .1 . ~4 , N •/ c • Jam- > j .-.,, o, f / D > ,i y''• ,� 0 •-'+_,r�• 'wD. .,;`1:'7 201,, e , Mr. V1,14 �/ . "`�wtrl a°60 'T _ o•d J v al •• wo 6. `` ,5,=.. C los.. - h eY ay�pq�d, r ' ]� lia i7 P'SAN��, 'r5> ev A I �- /\\(\� �`-.F" 1 / L..A I %Lt.jo? ,4 Eif I:.v 4 E. : IsI. t ylam o , I' \\ sosoaA ys I., f o J., wo I $PRIN ii ,.., ..„., g. fl ., \,. Siz �i n n' $t I I C 01{• Tf� J MHP : 'ill\- 5TAT/�' al D.�111 ,Y. Tina ; ;_ �1 T If... SA Teatb, cNYA J,CINTO :ft .id �o ! r�.\ \ , YI vw�• l r';�I FI SI16.7 yI-L .i. I- ''+ \F\ .Dlanade mitib °. ' iqtl :. , . -.......'...1, wY.°1'4, y!L'0 1 > v Comma wealth - Ian ._�1 ,M 7L CQTTO wealth A, .. �. I .. 1 �',ti� orf� Y / > i of f'� �T `I d . t�8o[_�0.j r . 1 J Eaton Av ' u .! I i i N_ Yn __ —�' —� NFMEf L_ 1 l J'•f0 •�� 1•� ®` ,,-.. 1� 1 •o, A ' ' 15; illk J y[ I1 , ; oI • I ' ',.0... A,... -it a [j IYa lig /-• V IrAim, •- „........ .i s i r �Saa 1 a., { Y w�i-,,,-—I `1I Menlo [€i \' Av ; t " tit' r, 4 Wa•b C �CILn i "Yau.t C • I .. 7 �'{{: 5 91 �"Y• e� Tay L kfEMET , ii r r4`E,n esr: � • •• 1 7¢ a 1./ .71rriaNNVklk%1/4. ,...771, 1 MMP m NEM �I c - `� I i , L , ;�., I�iI'Y1}I mg"I� I I I v • ' 41 0 1 .0___t. 2 .l,.n .If_R Ay • • . - 1991 = A I' - - f lfnl Y 4 lilt. W CI_ R S51141" -OI oE PI E lat - `W - , ' , 1 P'I :I o q 5 �� 7� u AV �A � 7 • n - L.J to e E ° FIJ : _ .79 r a B C D E F G 11 4 / ••:..., A-.• ____,,_______11 ,, „ Il IL_ -_____•1 • 1 r---- li 1 I •-• I , /•.,. •1 •0) 7: . - ,__ -.7..---7:•:71 ,=,r-i_,, I II • ' '11 71 j, i I , .......\"‹. 1 ii II i— .---• 0 -. , •:, I1C_11, ----,,-„1 , ---- 1 3 A et .44 Lf\j---1 .; , ' •.... s s / a \., ,g-------:,-, ... ... 1 1 ____ HE 10, i / ---ir---11 EMIT]MOM t• .1— i Ii , :____ _ q•--- LI rinLEErn i f I I . L '- 1 4:-----!"--: -- ____ ' LI ---If------In Fir—1....7=p4...._ ..--I , li-F,ILL-L_ — _ __,--_--ijr--7 / 1----ri:)- -----".-1 1 i - 11 -L,__P, d• ,./ 1--, ' 2 = - ...,, , gmt-i- ,15,1 4. . P S 6g4ti 1/ ." .\. its..\ . .... .• _fog ,„:„,,, /00 , 1---,!•• t.... ,0> / //:::"/ ".i-14.r1 I —II / .. ti • s I I II 11. —1___1 .' . , • • 1.--.—E .. ., . —II Staff Report S A N JACI NTO TO: Honorable Mayor & Councilmembers FROM: Les Evans, Director of Public Works via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: September 19, 1995 RE: MEASURE "A" PROJECT SEQUENCING Recommendation: Review and comment on "PROPOSED MEASURE "A" PROJECT SEQUENCING" list provided by the Riverside County Transportation Commission. Background: The Riverside County Transportation Commission has requested review and comment on the "PROPOSED MEASURE "A" PROJECT SEQUENCING" list developed by the RCTC at a retreat held in May 1995. The RCTC will consider comments at their October 11, 1995 meeting. As a first step, the RCTC has requested that the cities develop a list of the highest priority transportation improvements needed in the immediate area which are beyond the Measure "A" program and are currently underfunded. Projects the City Council may wish to consider include: 1. Completion of the Ramona Expressway (between Seventh St. and Cedar Ave.) 2. Construction of the Lake Park Drive Bridge 3. Reconstruction of Warren Road (between Cottonwood Ave. and the south City limits) 4. Construction of bridges at Seventh and Pine and at Lyon Avenue, south of Cottonwood and Cottonwood Avenue, west of Lyon to alleviate flooding of these arterial streets during winter weather. 110 An RCTC staff representative will be present at the meeting to answer questions or provide additional information. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION • August 7, 1995 Mayor David Solorio City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 Re: Measure A Project Sequencing Dear Mayor Solorio: The RCTC Commissioners are working on two very important issues with which they request participation from all of the local elected officials representing the Western Riverside County Area. The first is the development of a "Project Sequencing List" for development and construction of specific highway and rail projects identified in the Measure A Plan approved by the voters in 1988. The second is the development of a list of the highest priority highway and arterial improvements in the Western Riverside County Area which currently lack adequate funding and were not included in the Measure A Plan. The RCTC has been successful over the past seven years in constructing a number of specific • highway and rail projects promised to the voters who approved the Measure A 1/2 cent Sales Tax For Transportation in 1988. The projects in the Western County Area completed to date were selected either because they were the less costly requiring little, if any additional right of way; or substantial engineering and other work had already been completed by Caltrans or one of our local agencies. The projects which remain to be constructed are the more complex and expensive projects and those on which no significant project development work has been accomplished. As you are surely aware, the measure passed by better than a 2/3 majority vote in 1988. Success of the measure was in large part due to the commitment made by its drafters toward specific projects. The RCTC Commissioners are dedicated and intent on delivering all of the projects identified in the Measure A Highway/Rail Program for the Western Riverside County Area and request your assistance. The Commission has operated since 1988 without a Strategic Plan. Today we ask for your assistance in interpretation of the measure in an effort to adopt a Strategic Plan before the year is out. Attached is a copy of the "STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT SUMMARY REPORT" developed by the Commission through a special retreat held in May, 1995 to begin developing an overall plan for completing the remaining Measure A Highway/Rail projects. The report contains a "PROPOSED MEASURE A PROJECT SEQUENCING" to be used as a guide for the allocation of future federal/state (STIP) and Measure A revenues to complete project development work and construction. The list was developed based on a number criteria which included but were not limited to: a) the intent of Measure A as stated in the Expenditure Plan approved by the voters in 1988; b) the expected benefits for congestion relief of each project; c) continuity of the improvements within the highway system; and d) recognition that new congestion problems have developed since 1988 • necessitating the acknowledgement of these, and a commitment toward initiating the long process which may lead to future new funding sources with which to accomplish these projects. The Commission gave tentative approval to the proposed project sequencing at their meeting on July 3560 University Avenue, Suite 100 • Riverside, California 92501 (909) 787-7141 • FAX (909) 787-7920 • Measure A Project Sequencing Page 2 12, 1995, subject to review and comment by the cities in the Western County Area and the County • of Riverside. The Commission will reconsider and approve the list after considering comments received from the cities and the county at their meeting on October 11, 1995. The Commission will then develop a funding strategy to accomplish each of the projects based on annual STIP and Measure A revenues expected to be available in future years. Also attached are three short papers developed by the Commission to provide background information on: the federal/state highway funding process; the development of the Measure A Plan and progress to date; and the need for a cooperative longer range planning effort aimed at identifying and funding constructing of the next set of high priority transportation improvements in the Western County Area. We request that your elected representatives schedule a review and discussion of the proposed Measure A Project Sequencing on their regularly scheduled meeting agenda at their earliest convenience, and provide comments to the Commission prior to their meeting scheduled for October 11, 1995. Please keep in mind as you review the attached material, that we encourage your consideration in keeping with the intent of the measure. The measure, as shown in the voters handbook, is attached. It is the general position of the Commission that if there is to be an extension of Measure A or a follow up to Measure A, the future of those concepts will be determined by our ability to deliver what we promised in 1988. We also request that your elected representatives assist the Commission to develop a list of the highest priority transportation improvements needed in your immediate area, which are beyond the 4111 Measure A Program and are currently underfunded as a first step toward a collective effort to educate the public and develop a strategy for funding those projects in the future. Your cooperation and assistance in this effort is necessary for success and will be greatly appreciated by the RCTC Commissioners. If you have any questions or need further information please call us at 787-7141. If you will provide us with the date and time for the meeting when your agency will be discussing these issues we will arrange for RCTC staff to be present to answer questions or provide additional information as might be needed. Sincerely, Alex Cliffo , Chairman Riverside County Transportation Commission cc: Pamela Easter, Director of Public Works City Manager Western Riverside County of Governments Caltrans District 8 Enclosure(s) ti 4 "MEASURE A CREATED NEW REVENUES TO FIGHT CONGESTION" By 1987, it had become apparent to everyone that that "peak hour" commuter congestion along Rte 91, 60 and I-215 in Riverside was destroying the quality of life for long time residents as well as the "new" commuters who drove daily to and from their jobs in Orange and Los Angeles counties. The Riverside County Transportation Commission realized that reliance on STIP revenues as the sole source for highway improvements would not provide enough funding to add the lanes needed on these highways and to correct problems at the 60/91/I-215 interchange within the next 20 years or more. The Commission also recognized the immediate need for improvements on other state highways in the county. Even under the most optimistic projections for federal and state revenues expected to be allocated to Riverside County , there would be no STIP funds to widen Rte 79 (Hemet to I-10) and Rte 74 (I-215 to I-15), or to construct an "all weather crossing" over the San Jacinto River north of Hemet until far beyond a 20 year horizon, and only after improvements on the freeways in the Riverside Area were funded. The only answer to even begin to "catch up" in the fight against congestion was a new local revenue source. The Riverside County Transportation Commission developed the Initial Draft for the Measure A Expenditure Plan in 1987 for consideration by the voters of Riverside County. The Measure A Plan would return sales tax revenues to the area of the county in which they were generated. The Palo Verde Valley Area Plan called for using all Measure A Revenues returned to the area for local street and road purposes since no highway improvements were needed.. The Coachella Valley Area Plan called for a portion of the funds returned to the area (15%) to be used for highway improvements on Rte 86 and Rte 111. A significant share (40%) of funds the new revenues would be used to match revenues from a new development fees program to construct a system of regional arterials to relieve congestion along Rte 111 and between Rte 111 and I-10. The responsibility for administration and implementation of the regional arterial program was delegated to the Coachella Valley Association of Governments by the RCTC after Measure A was approved. The remaining 45% of the funds returned to the area would be split with 35 - 40% to be used for local street and road improvements, and the remaining 5-10% for transit projects. Funds returned to the Western Riverside County Area under the Measure A Plan approved by the voters in November, 1988 included the following three basic components:: I.. 40% of the all revenues generated from the MEASURE A 1/2 cent sales tax would go directly to the cities and county for local street widening and other improvements needed to accommodate growth in traffic, and to expand roadway maintenance programs. II. 55% of all revenues generated from the MEASURE A 1/2 cent sales tax, would be used to match anticipated STIP funds for the next 20 years to construct specific highway improvements identified as essential by the voters, and implement "commuter rail" service to Los 41110 Page 2 Angeles and Orange counties using existing rail lines, with possible extension to the Hemet/San Jacinto Area.. M. 5% of the revenues generated from the MEASURE A 1/2 cent sales tax, would be used to maintain low fares, expand specialized transit services for the elderly and disabled, and provide specialized services for commuters. The MEASURE A HIGHWAY/RAIL PLAN FOR THE WESTERN COUNTY AREA was drafted and refined by the RCTC through a cooperative process which included: information from Caltrans regarding estimated costs for the various projects; several polls of county residents; negotiations with city and county elected officials and managers; and suggestions from the Measure A Campaign Committee formed to promote the ballot measure through a countywide campaign financed by private sector contributions. Based on the amount of revenues which expected over the 20 years of the program, and since a significant amount of funding would be given to the cities and county to supplement their construction and maintenance programs, the Highway/R.ail Program identified in Measure A had to be aimed solely at "easing congestion which had already occurred." The impacts of congestion which would result from continued residential growth beyond 1988 would have to be accommodated through additional fees on new development, increases in state and federal gas • taxes, and/or some later sales tax or extension of the Measure A Program beyond the 20 years for which it had been approved. The projects ultimately included in the Measure A Highway/Rail Program were selected because they would: 1. Improve safety and traffic flow at the 60/91/1-215 Interchange by constructing new direct connectors. 2. Ease congestion for commuters on Rte 91, Rte 60 and 1-215 by adding new lanes. 3. Ease congestion for commuters on Rte 91, 60, and 1-215 by starting "commuter rail" service from Riverside to Los Angeles and Orange Counties 4. Improve "safety" and access between the Hemet/San Jacinto Valley and I-10 by widening Rte 79 and constructing an "all weather crossing" at Sanderson Avenue. 5. Improve safety and access between I-215 and I-15 by adding lanes on Rte 74. 6. Improve local circulation at highly congested interchanges in conjunction with main line improvements identified along Rtes 60, 91, and 1-215. 7. Providing financial assistance to fund new interchanges providing access and • encouragement for the construction of new "commercial and industrial centers" to increase job opportunities and improve the long term economic health of Western Riverside County. 0 5 Page 3 • The Measure A Highway/Rail Program is a "catch up" highway improvement program designed to most effectively use revenues from a 20 year 1/2 cent sales tax to construct improvements needed to ease existing congestion caused by rapid growth and development which took place over the past 10-12 years during which all available federal/state STIP funding had been programmed for realignment of Rte 86 in the Coachella Valley, and to construct I-15, and upgrade I-215 to accommodate future growth in the Southwestern County Area. At the time Measure A was passed, there was no expectation that any highway improvements beyond those already funded for I-15 and I-215 would be needed in the Southwestern County Area, and since so many state/federal highway dollars in the STIP had already been focused on these two freeways. The shift in the center of the amount of growth and congestion which occurred in the Southwestern County Area was not expected when the Measure A Plan was developed and approved. While the Measure was silent on sequencing, that is, the Measure did not say specifically when projects would be completed in years 1 to 20. However, the Measure did state "the major focus in the Western County is the improvement to State Route 91 and the State Routes 91/60/I-215 Interchange." "PROGRESS ON THE MEASURE A HIGHWAY/RAIL PROGRAM - 1988-95" The Measure A 1/2 cent Sales Tax for Transportation was approved by the voters in November, 411, 1988 and revenue collection began in 1989. The city and county local road construction and maintenance programs have benefited greatly from the infusion of new revenues provided from their 40% share of Measure A revenues for this purpose. In addition, the RCTC has assisted two of the smaller cities, Canyon Lake and Murrieta, to accelerate construction of major transportation projects. At the request of these cities, the RCTC arranged for bond proceeds to be available for the projects and refunded from the city share of local road funds over the 20 year life of the measure. During the seven years since Measure A was approved a great amount of progress has been made in delivery of the specific highway and rail improvements identified to reduce congestion and improve safety. 1.Commuter Rail Services: Commuter rail service is now operating daily during the morning and evening "peak hours" carrying Riverside County commuters to and from their jobs in Los Angeles. Service operates out from two stations constructed with Measure A funds located in Downtown Riverside and Pedley. A mid day train was recently added to accommodate people going to Los Angeles for 1/2 day business and other purposes. Expansion of the Downtown Riverside Station and construction of two new stations at La Sierra Avenue in Riverside, and Auto Center Drive in Corona are under construction. These stations • • Page 4 will be completed by October 2, 1995 in time to start service parallel to RTE 91 to provide Riverside County residents who commute daily to jobs in Orange County a less stressful alternative than automobile travel, and to help control congestion along the 91 Freeway. HIGHWAYS * ROUTE 91 New HOV (Carpool) lanes have been constructed along Route 91. The HOV lane have been completed and are in operation between Mary St. in Riverside and the Orange County Line. The HOV lane project from Mary Street to Magnolia Avenue in the City of Riverside is considered an "interim" project intended to provide some immediate relief to congestion in this area. The Measure A Highway Plan called for the addition of "up to 2 lanes in each direction". A study is currently being done by the Commission to determine where additional lane improvements will be made on this section of Rte 91 . The decision to construct HOV lanes rather than was determined partly by requirements for air quality conformity from the Environmental Protection Agency, and standards of the Federal Highway Administration regarding the construction of new highway lanes. The Commission has some concern of the value of HOV lanes rather than mixed flow lanes based on relatively low use of the HOV lanes which have been completed. They will be conducting a study and coordinating with state and federal air quality and highway agencies to determine if new freeway lanes can be used in the near term for mixed flow traffic and then converted to HOV lanes in the future when increased traffic indicates higher use by HOV's will occur. * RTE 91/VAN BUREN BLVD. INTERCHANGE Phase I of the improvements designed to improve local circulation at this interchange are currently under construction. A new westbound off ramp in southwest quadrant of the interchange will be completed within the next year and improve traffic flow at the intersection of Van Buren Blvd., Indiana Avenue, and the 91 Freeway. This project is being constructed at one of, if not the most, congested points along the Rte 91 Freeway. The replacement of the interchange structure is necessary to add lanes to the roadway as specified in the Measure. Design for replacement of the entire interchange will begin within the next year. This project is funded by a combination of Measure A Highway funds and local funds from the City of Riverside. * RTE 91 - CORONA INTERCHANGES In conjunction with construction of the new HOV lanes along Rte 91 through Corona, the interchanges at Maple and Lincoln Streets, and overpass at Smith Street were also reconstructed to accommodate the highway project. Widening of the structures to provide better circulation on the interconnecting surface streets was incorporated into the project and was funded by a combination of Measure A Highway funds, and local funds from the City of Corona. * I-15/YUMA DRIVE INTERCHANGE • A new interchange at Yuma Drive and I-15 in Norco needed to allow commercial and industrial development to proceed and provide new job opportunities for area residents will be under Page 5 • construction within the next year. This project will be funded by a combination of federal/state STIP funds, Measure A Interchange funds, and local funds from the City of Norco. * EASTRIDGE INTERCHANGE AT I-215 Measure A funds were added to local funds from the City of Riverside to expand the design of the interchange constructed as part of the project to upgrade I-215 to a Freeway and will significantly improve traffic flow expected in the near future. * RTE 60 - VALLEY WAY TO 60/19/1-215 INTERCHANGE AND I-215 TO UNIVERSITY AVE This project to add lanes to the Freeway will be funded by federal/state STIP funds with Caltrans as lead agency. The Environmental Study will be completed in the next 2-3 months and design is 90% complete. Construction will be done in 2 Phases. Phase 1 will be done in conjunction with a seismic retrofit project. Construction will start later this year and provide wider bridge decks needed for the new freeway lanes. Construction of the new freeway lanes is scheduled to start approximately one year after construction starts on the bridge project. * 60/91/1-215 INTERCHANGE This project will be funded by federal/state STIP funds and constructed by Caltrans. Due to the importance of this project in the Measure A Program, the RCTC has provided Measure A funds for technical assistance to Caltrans District 08 needed to obtain approval of an acceptable and affordable design for the project from the Federal Highway Administration. Measure funding has • also been used to collect and assemble information to move the Environmental Studies forward ahead of schedule. The project will provide two new direct connectors to reduce congestion and conflict at the interchange. The first connector will be the Rte 60 from Moreno Valley to Rte 91 through Riverside connector. The second connector will be the I-215 from San Bernardino to the 60/I-215 toward Moreno Valley connector. In addition to funding environmental and design assistance for Caltrans District 08, Measure A funds have also been used to purchase several key properties necessary for the construction project. These properties became available at a reasonable price and federal regulations would not allow Caltrans to purchase them with federal funds prior to completion of the Environmental Studies. Caltrans District 08 will complete the Environmental Studies for this project by 1997 and begin final design and Right of Way acquisition. * RTE 79 WIDENING AND ALL WEATHER CROSSING The "all weather crossing" of the San Jacinto River needed for travel between the Hemet/San Jacinto Valley and I-10 has been provided by construction of the new Sanderson Avenue Bridge Project completed last year. . Widening of Rte 79 to a 4 lane highway with right of way for expansion to 6 lanes in the future from the Sanderson Bridge to I-10 is under construction and currently well ahead of schedule. This project is funded by Measure A funds and will be completed within the next 6-9 months. Page 6 The addition of a grade separation to the Measure A funded Rte 79 widening project at the intersection of Gilman Springs Road and Rte 79 was accomplished through a cooperative effort between the RCTC and Caltrans District 08. Caltrans is providing state/federal funding to pay for construction of the new grade separation. The combination of these two projects will provide a significant cost savings to both the RCTC and Caltrans compared to the costs expected if these improvements were constructed as separate projects as was previously planned. Some of the projects listed above have been completed or are under construction, and are a part of the Measure A Highway/Rail program are not listed in the MEASURE A PROJECT SEQUENCING recommendations developed by Commissioners during the RCTC Retreat held on May, 19 and 20, 1995 since funding and priority decisions are no longer needed. The recommended sequencing is contained in the Table on Page 10 of the attached RCTC STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT SUMMARY REPORT. PB 8/95 • 1■ 1 n t S t "RESIDENTIAL GROWTH PATTERNS AND IMPACTS - 1970-1988" II/ Riverside County has been a center of rapid growth and development unmatched by any other areas of the United States for the past 20 years. While growth has been constant, the area in which growth has been centered has not. Since the passage of Measure A in 1988, both the physical and the political landscapes of Western Riverside County have changed significantly. From the early 1970's through the mid - late 1980's, the center of rapid residential development to meet the demands for housing from people with higher paying jobs in Orange and Lo s Angeles counties willing to commute was focused in the Corona, Norco, Riverside and Moreno Valley area. Morning and evening peak hour traffic on the 91, 60 and I-215 Freeways continually increased until traffic had slowed to a "snails pace". In the mid to late 1980's the center of residential growth for new commuters shifted to the Southwestern Area of Riverside County, generally defined as the area surrounding the cities of Temecula and Murrieta, and the unincorporated areas of the Menifee Valley and Sun City, and to some lesser extent, from Moreno Valley to the Banning/Beaumont area. One result was the incorporation of new cities including: Temecula; Murrieta; Canyon Lake; and Calimesa. Another result was the development of a new housing market. Residential development in the Southwest County not only continued to supply new housing for people willing to commute daily to work in Orange County, but also became an attractive housing market for a new group of people who worked in San Diego County, wanted lower cost housing, and were willing to commute to their jobs. 41111 The tremendous increase in traffic generated bynew commuters movinginto the Southwest County Area significantly added to the congestion along already overcrowded highways. Commuters to Orange County have further congested Route 91 from I-15 westerly, and have caused serious traffic problems on local streets in the City of Corona trying to beat freeway traffic through the city. These new commuters to both Orange and San Diego counties must use I-15. As a result Rte 79, a 2 lane highway in Temecula , has gridlock at peak hours immediately north and south of its interchange at I-15. Continued growth in this area is causing congestion to spread northerly along Route 79 toward the Menifee Valley, and will soon become a problem along the only other 2 lane highway and the only other north - south highway in the Western County Area, Rte 74 from 1-15 to I-215. The Coachella Valley Area also has experienced significant growth in full time residents, vacation homes, and tourism over the past 10-15 years. Congestion became a serious problem along Rte 111 from Palm Springs to Indio. Increased tourism, combined with heavy truck and other farming related traffic on Rte 86 from I-10 to Imperial County , resulted in an extraordinarily high accident and death rate for this two lane rural highway with unlimited access and heavy cross traffic. As a result, construction of Rte 86 on a new alignment with controlled access became the highest priority highway "safety" improvement project for Riverside County. - l (! 1• "HOW HIGHWAY PROJECTS WERE FUNDED PRIOR TO MEASURE A" Before Measure A was approved by Riverside County voters in 1988, all funding for major highway construction and widening projects in the State of California came from federal and state gas tax revenues. Funding was allocated to specific highway projects by the California Transportation Commission through the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) process. STIP funding was allocated to specific highway projects statewide on a "modified" competitive basis. Through efforts by the RCTC and others, Riverside County has continually been successful in receiving more than its fair share of STIP funds. However, certain federal and state requirements for gas tax allocation made it impossible for Riverside, and other rapidly growing counties, to receive adequate funding to construct many of the highway improvements needed to accommodate the traffic created by growth. The first problem for high growth areas in receiving adequate funding for highway improvements lies in the formula used to allocate federal gas taxes to the states. Federal gas tax funds were allocated annually to states with their primary purpose being for construction and maintenance of a nationwide interstate highway system. In order to provide a nationwide system, a portion of the gas tax revenues generated in the more populated states was needed to fund construction of the interstate highways across less populated states. California was, and still is, one of the most populated and mobile states, and a major contributor of federal gas tax revenues. As a result of the formula, California has always been considered a "donor" state, one which provides some of the revenues needed to complete and maintain the system in the less • populated states. Under federal law, California was guaranteed to receive a minimum of$0.85 in return for each $1.00 which it generated in federal gas tax revenue. While the basis for this formula has some logic, it nonetheless contributed to our problems in funding major highway improvements, especially during periods of rapid growth. A second problem for rapid growth areas receiving adequate funding for highway projects lies in the gas tax allocation process in California. The State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) process is used by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) to allocate funds for major highway improvements throughout the state. Once again development and maintenance of a continuous network of state highways connecting all major areas of the state is necessary. Since state highways were constructed and improved using state and federal gas tax revenues, once again, a portion of the gas tax revenues generated in the more populated areas had to be used to fund highways crossing through less populated areas of the state. Funding for highway improvements through the STIP process is allocated to projects statewide on a "modified" competitive process. Project selection is not determined strictly on the needs or benefits of the individual projects. While the majority of state gas tax revenues are generated in Southern California, they are not all returned for projects in that area. In order to fund state highways crossing and within less populated areas of the state, legislation required 40% of the total gas tax funds available for programming to be allocated by the CTC for projects in the North portion of the state; and the remaining 60% for projects projects in the South portion of the state. Riverside County highway projects compete for funding with other projects submitted from counties in South Area. Competition between projects proposed by the counties is further () I Page 2 tempered by an "equity" factor. The CTC is required to calculate a "county minimum" factor for each of the counties. This factor indicates the amount of available funding each county would have received over a 5 year period if funding was distributed on the basis of the population of each county to the total population of the area (North or South), rather than strictly on the basis of relative needs and benefits of each project. The population used to calculate the County minimums is taken from the federal census, which is updated every 10 years. State law requires the CTC to consider "county minimums" in their selection of highway projects for funding, and to attempt to program funding so that each of the counties would receive an amount at least close to their "county minimum" share over the five year STIP period. Using the federal census population in the STIP process further adds to the problem for "rapid growth" counties needing additional funds for improvements needed due to traffic resulting from increased population. The use of population from the federal census , updated every 10 years, causes a significant lag behind the actual increase in population and the time the estimated funding the CTC considers to be a fair share of available revenues in their project selection process. The major focus of the Measure A Highway Program for the Western Riverside County Area was on improving Rte 91 through the cities of Riverside and Corona to the Orange County Line and the 60/91/1-215 Interchange. The improvements were necessary to ease congestion of the new residents who commuted daily to jobs in Orange County. The program was silent on improvements for I-15 and 1-215 south of the 60/1-215 Interchange because major improvements were already planned for these routes and funding was programmed in the STIP. From the early • 1970's through 1986 the Riverside County Commission was successful in receiving more than its "county minimum" share funding through the STIP process. State Routes 91 and 60, I-10, and 1-215 from the San Bernardino County Line to the 60/1-215 Interchange in Moreno Valley were improved to Freeway standards by the early - mid 1970's. From the mid 1970's through 1986 all funding requests to the CTC for major highway construction in Riverside County were for funds to: construct I-15 from the San Bernardino County Line north of Norco to the San Diego County Line south of Temecula; upgrade 1-215 to a freeway from the 60/1-215 Interchange in Moreno Valley to I-15 near Murietta; and, construct Rte 86 in the Coachella Valley as an Expressway on a new alignment. During the 10-12 years prior to development of the Measure "A" Program in 1987, the Corona, Norco, Riverside and Moreno Valley Area was the center of rapid residential growth which caused unbearable congestion on Rte 91, 60, and 1-215. During this same period, as mentioned above, all STIP funds programmed for highway improvements in Western Riverside County were allocated to construct the" new " I-15 Freeway, and upgrade I-215 from Moreno Valley to 1-15. The Southwestern County Area was the area which benefited most from these two major highway improvements which were expected to provide adequate capacity for traffic expected from those areas within the foreseeable future. Due to the relatively high costs for those projects, and even though we received more than our share of available STIP funds, no major improvements to relieve the increasing congestion on the existing freeways ( Rte 91, 60 or 1-215 in Riverside) could be programmed until the 1-15, I-215, and Rte 86 projects had been fully • programmed. The possibility of providing improvements to reduce congestion in the near future Page 3 was further diminished because new projects programmed into the STIP with the expectation that construction would not begin until 5 years later to allow Caltrans adequate time to complete project development and design, and acquire right of way. By 1986 when STIP funds could once again be requested from the CTC for improvements to reduce congestion Rte 91 and 60, the earliest that any construction could be started was 1991. Another funding source was needed. PB 8/95 • • r01 �y "THE NEXT STEPS - COMPLETION OF THE MEASURE A HIGHWAY AN RAIL PROGRAM AND COORDINATED LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING FOR IMPROVEMENTS AND FUNDING" While Riverside and other counties are continuing to grow, and traffic is increasing with that growth, federal/state funding is becoming more difficult to obtain to improve our transportation system. Federal transportation officials are predicting that federal funding for transportation will continue to decrease each year for the next 5-7 years as they attempt to balance the budget. Federal Legislators are not expected to increase the gas tax for at least several years, and if they do, it is possible that a portion of those new revenues will go for deficit reduction rather than transportation as they did in the last federal gas tax increase. State transportation revenues are also down due to the economy and other factors and the State Budget also has serious deficit problem. It is also highly unlikely the State Legislature will increase the gas tax any time in the next several years. All federal/state transportation revenues expected to be available for Riverside County over the at least next 15+ years through the STIP process are needed to match the Measure A Highway and Rail funds to complete the specific projects identified in the Measure A Highway and Rail Program. The possibility to construct any additional major transportation projects to accommodate growth that is certain to occur within the next 20 years, rests upon the development of a longer range transportation plan which identifies the highest priority projects, and is accompanied by an agreed upon strategy to fund those projects. • While State and Federal officials are attempting to find a reasonable solution to the transportation funding problem, there is no "real " expectation that the solution will simply be to increase the gas tax. A number of possible alternatives to restructure the funding and construction of highway improvements, including additional "privatization" of highway construction projects are under consideration by state and federal agencies and could very well become a part of their overall funding programs in the near future. We cannot reasonably expect either state or federal revenue programs to ever provide the adequate funding for projects which will be needed to accommodate all ready approved and projected new growth, particularly in the Western Riverside County area. The more realistic solution to our future transportation dilemma lies in a cooperative and a concerted effort by the elected representatives of the cities of the Western County Area and the County of Riverside to identify and fund their most needed arterial and highway improvements. Programs to develop these new local revenues will have to consider alternatives such as the Measure A 1/2 cent Sales Tax for Transportation, the Uniform Transportation Mitigation Fee Program of the Coachella Valley Association of Governments, or some combination which generates and returns revenues to the same area. Any "new" funding program will have to receive approval from the general public, most likely through a ballot measure. Based on past experience the programs will have to be specific regarding the improvements to be accomplished and under current state law will have to be countywide. While such approaches are difficult, and may not fund all of the projects envisioned for future growth, the approval percentage for the Measure A Program shows they are one viable means of funding • the highest priority projects which benefit the most residents.. (! 7I • Page 2 In order to have any reasonable expectation for a new local transportation longer term plan and revenue program will have a chance at success, two very important steps must be taken very soon. I. COMPLETE THE MEASURE A HIGHWAY/RAIL PROGRAM !!! The Riverside County Transportation Commission remains dedicated to seeing that all of the specific highway and rail project identified for construction with federal/state STIP and Measure A revenues expected to be available for the 20 years covered by the MEASURE A EXPENDITURE PLAN approved by the voters in 1988 will be completed. While the RCTC has had significant success over the past years since Measure A was approved, they had not developed a priority based program which would identify how and when all of the highway and rail projects would be funded and constructed. The RCTC is currently preparing a priority list to construct each of the highway/rail projects which are not currently under construction. The Commission will then prepare a funding program and schedule for each of the projects. At their meeting on July 12, 1995 the Commissioners gave tentative approval to the MEASURE A PROJECT SEQUENCE LIST contained on Page 10 of the attached "STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT SUMMARY REPORT" developed at a RCTC Retreat in May, 1995. Copies of this report are being provided to every city in the Western County Area and the County of Riverside with a request for their for review and comments. The Priority List and comments received from the cities and the county will be presented to the Commission at their monthly meeting in October. The Commissioners will: review comments received from the cities and county; approve a final project sequence list; and direct staff to prepare a funding program which shows when each of the projects can be expected to be completed. The proposed funding program developed by the RCTC staff will be based on projected federal/, state (/STIP) and/or Measure A revenues projected by year, and will be allocated to each of the specific highway/rail project for project development work and construction. The members of the Riverside County Transportation Commission recognize the importance that delivery of the Measure A Program has on the possibility of any future local transportation revenue generating program. Unless success is shown in delivering this program, it is unlikely that either elected officials or the general public will be inclined to support any future revenue programs. The Commission also recognizes that issues arise and that priorities may change over time. In order to keep the Measure A Program moving ahead and to make any adjustments in priorities which may be needed, the Commission intends to revisit the project priority list by holding future retreats, similar to the one held this past May, and requesting comments from the cities and the county every two to three years. • Page 3 II. DEVELOP A LONGER RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND FUNDING SOURCE !!!. Long Range Transportation Planning efforts for Western Riverside County to date have been the responsibility of SCAG and the Western Riverside Council of Governments. Their planning efforts have focused on identifying all of the transportation improvements expected to be needed to accommodate the forecasts of future population and employment, and to meet air quality conformity requirements. The costs associated with the projects identified in the WRCOG Long Range Transportation Plan exceed projected federal, state, and local sources by more than $6 billion. While this information is useful for overall planning purposes, it is does not provide the specific type of information which the general public will easily understand and give their support to funding. Funding for future transportation projects will have to come from a number of sources and in increments. Federal and state gas taxes should be adjusted to reflect higher needs and increasing costs for construction. While a continuing program to push our state and federal Legislators to make adjustments in the gas tax to provide additional revenues for improving the our highways is needed, we need to keep in mind that formulas used by the federal and state agencies to allocate gas tax revenues back to the states are "return to source" formulas. The formulas currently used take a portion of the revenues generated in the more populated and high growth areas and reallocate for projects though the less populated areas. Local funding programs will have to be developed. As discussed earlier success of the Measure A Program in Riverside County, and similar local transportation measures throughout the state, there is a much greater higher chance of success in approval when the programs contain very specific projects for which the public can see both the need and the benefit. Therefore new local funding will most likely be developed through a series of smaller programs for specific projects over time, rather than as a single broad ranging program. Attempts to date for gaining approval of local funding programs which were not project specific have not been accepted by the public. The Commission intends to develop a process through which they can work collectively with the cities and the county to develop new revenue sources for high priority projects which are beyond the Measure A Program. In recognition of this point this past year, the Commission determined that some of the "discretionary" funds available to Western Riverside County from the Surface Transportation Program created in the federal Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) should be programmed to assist in funding a project to improve Rte 79 in the Temecula area. In addition to requesting comments on the Measure A Project Sequencing List, the Commission is also requesting each of the cities and the county to identify their highest priority unfunded transportation projects. After the list of projects is developed the Commission will then work with the cities and the county to develop cost estimates for right of way and construction of those projects, and to develop a proposed funding plan. • i ! I • Page 4 Due to current economic conditions, the chance that any new revenue program will be approved by the public within the next year or two is not good. However it is not too soon to develop an educational program which: 1) keeps the public in the Western Riverside County Area aware of progress in the delivery of the Measure A Highway/Rail Program; and 2) begins to increase their awareness that there are additional high priority projects which are needed but cannot be funded with existing revenues. Without a continuing educational program aimed at informing elected officials and the general public of the true funding crisis which transportation is facing, and which includes them in the decision process, we cannot expect them to realize that existing state/federal gas tax and other local revenue sources cannot be expected to somehow provide adequate funding revenues for all of our project at some time in the near future. PB 8/95 • • 111111111111111010...........mmumwmul *--14::4;r4.iffy4V-4:1,5.1,4e.1 RIVERSIDE • :.11,,,T0,-e 1.1,,••••::,..,"".kt ' CONSOLIDATED GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 1988 • • SAMPLE BALLOT . and Voter Information Pamphlet NOTICE: APPLICATION FOR ABSENT VOTER BALLOT ON BACK COVER • .... ...----„-----,---..--,..."--:-.--=.---,.- _.--, . ....7,,,f7,...77,;,...t.-7, g .- -.... -% .,...,7-.a .,., rir-,,r,r---.7.-..z.vm,,-....,, . ...-,,. . -•,-.,,•,-‘ ....,. •.-...- - ,•.-..• --,.., ..!...,-...,.vzy..-•.,,....f.t.Is...., ''.c., :'•„,,, ,.•-,..e., 4.-e",' . -‘• e.•• - ,e . ..?•.' • - ;. .: .". ..ret.7.:..•e:-. ,,,.;...._'.•.-. •."1.-",..-74. ••‘-1'4*TeN*... ..,:-.;.'.;:..--'> _, •'''' '..-.,,; •''...; .1.•'‘. ‘'1.•.s eV%•••• .i., .•-•• -11.''..e:c .1.7,4,:tA.i:t";f:::-..o...:V:-.,,!;t41,, .'1.•;,.::Vt S.;:1:4V:44,111t;,—•47 ea 1:-:--1 11'1(147N:4A trilb:j 'iti1171:;11 C3 te '''f,- -f7":..r...-.•:,';‘.--.:•zir..,-,1 ..—• -.• „. •, s .• f. ...- Fr,........ .... •••• J•••:.,„ --,.t.....17 ,.%„..... :44tr......f.:-•;.;•.'2:•`,A 11 rl - ..t. 3 .1- . 1,.. ,1 .1. , ?,,,L,.71'. ... 4.„--, ...:',,,,••••,...‘..a rt.ii...rjA)....h.1/... ^,,.....,....,•.i 64.'4.;'.1.-'7'..'• .. :•"7 1 ....:. - - --.. , ,14 ,,...1•1,/1'44',..,..•7,-1,.., ,.r,,i",-•.1...i.‘k,,•'-•::•if,.....q.•%•••......r,,Z. ii..1.-:—:•'Z'g:,4- i' .-..., .‘: ••• ...‘ • • .' ",',...r I... •• ' ..... -r- '" -, q {-_, 0 • 4 ..---.... .... .. t, grl 11-;•-4•_,,.,;..:-.„,:.., -2. -.. ,.--1 pi k r% ,. ; CI iiir.:13.....4 p,IA la L-1-..,-..•,- .....\•-r..k.,.,, .2 it...,.;„t".,j r_•:•_: ..,........„,..._...•s.,..:. .r. .—..„...•1...„.„,/,1 1 4 8-'', 1/4, ..t.L;,.... r ... ...-- -,1.,...,,::....;,, /Arzt,,;.r.,-.4....,,,Ii.:„..,•vo,;,,,..L-3,4 • ,•41.. .•-:,:,-1 -......':'--;.: ' ..--;•- ...,---1-----,v- , . • • ...• •,• .`'7—5:-.J:• ,e"s .-----:^cd-rtli--1Z•e s':...1.•..,:pr 71:. : ‘. . • '.'.: . i... .. -. ..:.....;• . -...'..-‘.4....`'':ell..4........i 4..'''',.,'. Wr..f. ''.1 1:;.7r•7::::Ir-k/o.4.ift• I ; • C. N P,-...1 ea.e *IPA till 4 714..4*,•;.•.:,-::..•!--.4:V,-t!"•-'1.4:4 Vn 1,.l'ai'j:i t ft 1 i t.' ...,•• A I ,.W'•0 k.e-i 1. tli 'V re 41 •,..-.;..Z1,..(1.1.., 4 - m gli'4",•..i--yr-s='^r'•64%•!..•'- g...,,D‘;',,w-;.;':.!7.-4'- A.tz.„.,kr3.14,,4.•\,.,%F:',4'._j.; '` ...&-. ..1;"A,.:.."--rX**,..5•4,.%;0,-.:, .. . .;:t,,'.,.--.A...corn,.•:,.....T`. I'' Fitt'...- ;&-!--•-.:'''-','... ..- --. -.. . • .7-, :--..: .- --- • - - .- •:, Lr.-..-.::...,1.`•-;•,...s7:47- - .,_), 1-1',1,....;,..;, ..,........,•••.L .'- .,. ' , ., , , '., , '--"' .. .c- -'.. : ::,..-.J.,.:,..."..?, ,-;-,-.3-,-,--....14,,::,..-: s14 ai/.‘ .‘. • r 1.it.31 •. : ' I 7 ;:if '".si illy I %* .:ilt•lf-Iti,WtqY.4.1.--. .- ts'-',4„r % • i . , 0-49' -I - '.1i- • :a,. -..-lu r 4. 1 • *,.L.,_42..1 ' ,, t ....... .., .11 ,!.s ,-1.,, . ..L.' -',---",.-,.-.1` ?-ft t •1-.1 r. .‘.. ' •- ....,, .,„.•.:---. •• .f.:',. '...:.'"'...--.1--ilt'' "-..:-''''? r,,'', "":'''-'•.;? '''''•--* ' ' ' -- •' ' ' • '-- • ' . •'''' 'r--'• - 7"i?• '!. •' '';'-4 - -.:;'-- • :*' • •=-1 r.•-•.•uss,,s.":".;;:".t•,,i---4-..e-y-• _... ,• .,!----......:._ .:-•_:. • ..:• ----: -„"....7, . -.---.,..-ss -'‘,-.-4-k.--s-.- '-s-,--,•,,41" -!:C.A..1'^,r•-. ,..:,-4. • `i * '_ IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS MEASURE A ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE A Measure A would authorize the Riverside County Transportation If you are as sick and tired of living with traffic congestion as we are,do ommission to impose a maximum retail transaction and use tax of something about it. Vote yes on Measure A. Measure A is a new one-half of 1 percent throughout Riverside County for a period not to exceed twenty years to be used to supplement existing local revenues approach to our traffic problem. It offers us a well-thought-out plan to being used for transportation purposes pursuant to Ordinance No.88.1 deal with traffic and improve the quality of life in Riverside County. of the Riverside Transportation Commission. Measure A would "Yes on A""will widen the Riverside Freeway from six to ten lanes from establish an appropriations limit for the Riverside County Transportation• the Orange County line through to the City of Riverside. tt guarantees Commission of$75 million for the first fiscal year pursuant to Article XIII B of the California Constitution and authorize issuance of limited tax major improvements to other existing highways such as Routes 60 bonds in the aggregate principal amount not to exceed $300 million for (Pomona Freeway),1.215,86,74,the Mid-Valley Parkway in the desert, capital outlay expenditures and,to carry out the transportation projects adding an all-weather bridge to 79 and improving the 91/60/1-215 in the expenditure plan adopted as part of Ordinance No. 88-1. interchange. Measure A provides that not more than 1 percent of the annual net "Yes on A" means cleaner air by reducing the time our cars spend income of revenues raised by the retail transaction and use tax may be needlessly idling in traffic jams,producing SMOG. used to fund the salaries and benefits of the staff of the Riverside County Transportation Commission in administering the programs funded and "Yes on A" helps seniors and disabled citizens by increasing transit requires Cities and the County to certify annually that they are service and guaranteeing half-price fares. maintaining their existing commitment of local funds for street,highway and public transit purposes while using their allotment of the retail -Yes on A"repairs,improves and maintains local streets and roads by transaction and use tax to supplement existing local revenues. halting road deterioration and preventing more costly repairs. A majority of the electors voting on Measure A must vote "yes"in "Yes on A" provides new commuter rail service on existing railroad order for the measure to pass. Passage of Measure A will result in tracks within Riverside County and to Orange and Ins Angeles Ordinance No. 88-1 becoming effective at the close of the polls on Counties. Convenient commuter rail means fewer cars and less traffic November 8. 1988. with an operative date of the_first day of the first on our freeways and roads. calendar quarter commencing more than 120 days after adoption of -- — Ordinance No. 88-1. -Yes on A"encourages carpools and vanpools with more park-and-ride By County Council lots and by adding carpool lanes. —Yes on A"improves safety on our major highways by adding call boxes 111/ throughout the county. Measure A is a new approach to solving one of the worst problems in our community. It will mean safer roads,cleaner air and shorter commutes for our families,workers.students,seniors and disabled;in other words. a major improvement in the quality of life for all Riverside County. Please join us in supporting Measure A. By: Virginia L Field, President Clean Air Now Art Pick. Executive Vice President Greater Riverside Chamber of Commerce Marvin A.Axetton,Founder,Past President Corona Chapter AARP (American Association of Retired Persons) Bob Lofton, Associate Director, GSMOL(Golden State Mobilhome Owners League.Inc.) Region Nine, Riverside County Mary Curtin. Past President League of Women Voters NO ARGUMENT AGAINST PRECEEDING MEASURE WAS SUBMITTED. 1,, _ oso-0a SECTION VI. BONDING AUTHORITY. Upon voter approval el measure A" ORDINANCE NO. //-1 funds.the Commission shall have the power to tell or issue,item tine to tore, limited tax bonds in the aggregate principal amount et aety one time outstanding of Riverside Comm Transportation Crtrarniasisa expenditure for this purposes set forth m Trenspertettoa Expenditure Plea not to exceed 8300 mttliion ter appal outlay l a 7 f., and Retail T mien and Use Tax Ordinance Section V hereof.including to carry out the transportation grottos described in the Expenditure Plan. Preamble SECTION VII. MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT. The Commission.by the enactment of this Ordinance.intends the additional funds provided government agencies by this 11 e transpoepairs cisystem existing in Riverside County is rapidly deteriorating. gestio• chaplet to supplement existing local rtrvenws being used for t»mpoAatien 1 111111 rice and repairs sti with roadways and improvements ao rtionallieve funds. this purposes. The government agencies shall maintain their existing commitment of Hoot be accomplished available funds. Without additional funds. the and public transit purposes pursuant to this Ordmarite, local funds for street highway stem y will bog down and pavementan will crumble into is incretasing. disrepair. State and the C.O shall enforce this Section by appropriate actions including fiscal ghway funds are inadequate end competition for funds is mctuanp. Protects in audits of the local agencies. eas where local sales tax funds are available will be viewed much more favorably the selection process of the California Transportation Commission. Local ,vemments must either generate revenues to sere the system or watch the system The local cities and the County shall annually submit to the Commission a list of the illapse and endanger the health- welfare and salary of all Riverside County proposed uses for these funds and a certification that the maintenance of effort requirement is being met If in any fiscal year the maintenance of effort ndents. requirements is not met the agency shall not be eligible for any Measure"A"funds in the following fiscal year. Such fonds shall be distributed to the remaining local one-half percent sales tax for transportation to supplement traditional revenues rttrnvms using the formula for the area. rid revenues to be generated through locally-adopted developer fees and goK ssessment districts for transportation improvements is the only way local ovemments can be sure the transportation system will serve the current and future SECTION VTII. RETURN TO SOURCE- Funds for transportation purposes shall be .avel needs of Riverside County. The Riverside County Transportation Commission allocated to the Western County. Coachella Valley, and Palo Verde Valley areas All continue to seek maximum funding for transportation Improvements through proportionate to the Measure"A fund%toweled within these areas. tate programs. The Commission will not provide sales tax revenues to any city or 3 the County unless revenues currently used by that agency for transportation are SECTION IX. ADMINISTRATION OF PLANS. The Commision shall impose and ontinued to be used for transportation purposes. collect Measure"A"funds,shall allocate revenues denied.and shall administer the Expenditure Plan consistent with the Authority cited herein. The Riverside County Transportation Commission ordains as follows: SECTION X. ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS. The that Commission shall expend only +ECTION I. SUMMARY. This ordinance provides I or the imposition of a retail amount of the funds generated from Measure "A" for staff support audit. -- ransaction and use tax of one-hill percent for a period of twenty 120)nen.the administrative expenses.and contract services that are necessary and reasonable to out its responsibilities pursuant to Division 25.and in no case shall the funds lutho :ounty to issue transportation limited tax bonds.and the administration of the tax proceeds and n Winded for salaries and benefits exceed one percent (1%) of the annual net expenditure plan. amount of revenue raised by Measure"A". SECTION II. DEFINmONS. The following definitions shall apply in this ordinance: SECTION Xl. ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT. Pursuant to Article XIIIB of the A. Expenditure Plan. "The Expenditure Plan" means the Riverside County California Constitution and Public Utilities Code S131108(g),an appropriations Transportation Commission Expenditure Plan attached as Exhibit B) and limit of$75 million is established for the Commission for the lint fiscal year. The adopted as part of this Ordinance including arty future amendments thereto. appropriations limit shall be subject to adjustment as provided by law. • B. "County"means the County of Riverside. SECTION XII. EFFECTIVE AND OPERATIVE DATES. Subject to voter approval this ordinance shall take effect at the close of the polls on November 8, 1988. C. "Commission" means the Riverside County Transportation Commission i created pursuant to Sections 130053 and 130053.5 of the Public Utilities SECTION XOI. ELECTION. The Commission requests the Boars!of Sunernson to I Code. call an election for voter approval of Measure"A"(Exhibit Al.which election shall be held on November 8.1988 and consolidated with other elections to be held on that same date. The election shall be called and conducted in the same manner as SECTION of AUTHORITY.(co This ordinance ist enacted.in part pursuant to the provided by law for the conduct of elections by a county. Pursuant to Public prov Code.and Sectionf Division 25 22 of the Revenue e Section 240000)of the Public Utilities tilities Code S 131108.the sample ballot to be mailed to the voters shall be the full Lode.and 7252.22 of the and Taxation Code. proposition as per forth in the ordinance.and the vier information handbook shall the include OF RETAIL TRANSACTIONS AND USE TAX. Upon the entire Expenditure Plan. Approval of the attached proposition,and the SECTION IV. IMimposition of Measure"A shall require the vote of•majority of the electors voting voter approval of the same,the Commission shall impose.in the incorporated and attached proposition at tM election described en shin section. unincorporated temtory of the County of Riverside-a retail transactions and use tax on the lief erred to as the Measure"A"fund tax)at the rate of one-half of one percent 10 5%1 for a period of twenty(20)years from the date which the Commission and the SECTION XIV. EXPENDITURE PLAN AMENDMENTS. The Expenditure Plan for Measure "A"funds may only be amended-if required. by the following process: additionState Board of other a taxes agree authorizede begin collection,includingo te tax. The future shall bo in 1 Initiation of amendments by the Commission reciting findings of necessity: local salesto any other anduse by law, any existing or state or 1 1 Approval by the Board of Supervisors:and (3) Approval by a majority ef oval tax or transactions and lax. (2)the cities constituting a majority of the incorporated population. SECTION V. PURPOSES. Measure"A"funds may only be used for transponation SECTION XY. SEVERABILITIf. If any tax or provision of this ordinance is fox any purpose including the administration of Division 25,including legal actions related ion thnt mason held invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdict roads, the construction.clistate tel.highwaysghaion- public and operation of struts. holding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining Measure"A" purposespo. Thesehe-including le e and public for transit systems and fo related fonds or provisions.and the Commission declares that it would hove passed each purposes include s.and expenditures the planning,environmental part of this ordinance irrespective of the validity,of any other pail reviews, engineering and design costs.and related right•of-way acquisition BY: Roe Vases'.Vice Chairmen Riverside Ceanty Transportation Ceounission iii. 05 - • (. '11 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN Roam Limits Project Cest Range JULY 13. 1981 (t Yrlliees) GOALS AND POLICIES Rte 60 Route 91 to Valley Way Widen to 6 lanes(add 1 lace 16.E (Pomona Freeway) is each direction) IMPROVE AND MAINTAIN THE DUALITY OF UFE IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY BY Rts 74 Interstate 15 to Interstate 215 Widen to 4 lanes(add 1 lane 28.E SUPPLEMENTING EXISTING FUNDS FOR TRANSPORTATION. 9 in each direction) — • Enhance Riverside County's ability to secure State and Federal funding for Rue Winchester Road to Warren Realign curve 2.0 transponauon by earwig mauhmg local funds. Road — Avoid Los Anpelwurx" of Riverside County by reducing current traffic Rta 79/ Interstate 10 to Route 14 near Widen ponnons to 4 lanes& 19 4 congestion problems mow. Sanderson Hemet/San Jacinto construct all-weather crossing at Sanderson PROVIDE FOR EQUITY IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF MEASURE A REVENUES. Rue 79 Newport Road to Keller Road Widen to 4 loos(Add 1 lane 10.0 — Return funds to the Western County. Coachella Valley and Palo Verde Valley in each directs* proportionate to funds generated m those areas. Rte 60/ Route 91 to Route 60 Widen lanes 8 to (add 1 lane 18.8 — Adopt improvement Plan proposals which address the unique needs of each of 1215 ineach8duection) mast areas of the County. 'Rea 1-215 Interchange to San Bernardino Widen to 8 lanes ladd 1 lane 14.2 — Provide for a reasonable balance between competing highway,commuter rail. County Unit in each duecuon) transit and local street and road needs. Rea 91/60 80/91/1-215 Interchange Reconstructwith 2 direct 115.0 PROVIDE FOR LOCAL CONTROL OF THE IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROGRAM. freeway to freeway ramps — Provide for cost-effective.local administration of the program through the easing Rte 80& Various locations Lease Park&Ride lots 2.0 Rwersioe County Transportation Commission. No new agency would be created 91 to aomimster these funds. Rte 60.91 Various locations Interchange work to improve 30.5 — Delegate appropriate administrative responsibility to cities,the county,and other &1.215 local circulation local agencies for local programs. AM Various locations Share cost of interchange:far 20.0 This TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN, which shall also act asthe County's job development expenditure plan.was prepared by the Riverside County Transportation Commission for the proposed Ys%local transactions and use tax for transportation to be collected for the All Spaced per standard/all Augment highway call box 2.0 20 rears if approved by voters on November 8. 1988—Measure A. This isilk sys funding by the Commission as a means to fill the funding chanfall to implement needed ay and commuter rail projects, local street and road programs and transit highwContingencies 32.0 improvements for the seniors and handicapped people. SPECIFIC TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED TOTAL _ i624.7 If correcting projects are constructed in San Bernardino County. WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY Funds to support these projects will come from a highway and commuter rail The Improvement Plan Mao illustrates both the Western Riverside County and Coachella transportation account of$339 million Valley areas The Western County area includes the cities of Riverside. Banning. Beaumont. Corona. Hemet. Lake Elsinore. Moreno Valley. Norco, Perris. and San Z Lail Streets and Reads Jacinto. It also includes the unincorporated communities of Sun City.Canyon Lakes. and Rancho California and other sparsely populated unincorporated areas, Over the last 20 years,available funds for maintenance of local streets and roads has declined. At the same time.these facilities are reaching"'middle age."with 1. State Highways potholes and need for major reconstruction. local street improvements adjacent to new residential and business developments will continue to be paid for by the Many more state highway projects are needed to deal with congestion and safety developers. The greatest need is for maintenance and rehabilitation of the problems than existing federal and state revenuescan fund. The major focus m existing crty and h road system. Current resources cover only 25%to 50% the Western County area is improvement to State Route 91 and the State Routes of pavement maintenance needs.91/60/1-215 interchange. The 1988 costs of these and other priority highway projects in the Western County area exceed$620 million. Estimated funds from The Improvement Plan proposes that 40%of the Measure A funds to be returned to existing state and federal sources will meet only about one-half of oust the Western County area shall be used to assist funding lot local streets and roads. needs. Measure A lands are antrapated to cover the°User half. Funds should be distributed to the PUSS and the County ly a formula based 75%on proportionate population and 25%on Measure A revenues generated within each The highway projects to be implemented with funding assistance from Measure A junsdiction Five year Capital Improvement Programs will be prepared and funds returned to the Western County area are as follows: annually updated within each city and the County with public participation. Route Licata Prefect Cost Rase 3.. Diaceeat Flees and Yore Transit Service Mr Serer and Handicapped (1 Millions) Discount transit firs for seniors(age s 60 sad elder)and handicapped people are Rte 91 Orange County line to Meg- Widen from 6 to 10 lanes(Add 1118.0 now arse-half the normal tare for find route transit service within the Western nobs Avenue(South-west 2 lanes in each duecuon) County area. Measure A funds will be used to guarantee continuation of this River:ide)IfLirerade Freeway) reduced fan for 20 years. In addition. funds will be used to provide further 91/60/ Add up m 2 lanes n each 173.5 m to do this include providing vans and operating reductions forth'truh needy. Funds will be used to expand easing services and 91 Magnolia Avenue toimplem ent pew services. Waystaxi service for medical 1-215 Interchange(Riverside directiontew assistance social service agencies contracts for evening . freeway) purposes. • and an outreach program to advise senors aid handicapped people of all available transit winces and how to use them. The ntent of this program is fire 60 Interstate 215 to Redlands Widen to 6 lanes laid 1 lane 21.7 to provide minks to those with no other means of uansponatan. Funding for Boulevard(Pomona Freeway) in each daemon) this program would come from$31 million to specialized uansponatioa oso-oa The remaining Measure A snare of this tend will be used to implement the planned Geometer Buses.Canteels and Vageoh Regional Arterial System. The estimated cost for arterial system improvements wilt exceed 2200 million. The proposed system is to be eaplemented with a nun i , A systematic program will be implemented that encourages the use of commuter of existing funding require/Iron new dewbpment,a Uniform Traffic Miugnion , i .„ bus. carpools and vanpools to make our existing highway system work better Fee which would also be paid by developers from new development and Measure during congested rush hour periods. The commuter bus component will consist A lands returned to the Ccachetta Valley Area. The Unafonn Traffic Mitigation of express bus service between major points for home and work tnps utilizing Fee schedule shall be established in order to generate at least the equivalent of special bus/carpool lanes on the freeway system as they are constructed The Measure A funding toward the regional arterial system. • use of carpool and vanpools will be encouraged by improving computer assisted ndeshanencouraging ng matching programs, positive incentives by mayor employ- his anticipated that this plan will be implemented through the Coachella Valley ors and providing-seed—money for the stun up of vanpool groups for initial vehicle Association of Governments. The highest priority projects include the A4id-YsMty purchase. insurance and related costs. Funding for this program would come palswry (from Gene Autry north of Vista Chino to I.10 at Monterey). Palm from 231 million for specialized trusponauon programs. Drive/Gene Autry Trail(from the Mid-Valley Parkway to Desert Hot Springs).Fred Waring Drive(from Rout*111 in Palm Desert to Indio Boulevard).end Jefferson Commuter Rail to las Angelesend Demises Counties Street(from Avenue 54 to Indio Boulevard). Recent studies indicate that development of a commuter rail system using existing Local Streets and Reads rail lines from the Riverside/San Bernardino areas to Los Angeles and Orange Counties is feasible. Commuter rail service would be beneficial to Riverside area 1 As in Western Riverside County.over the last 20 years available funds have not commuters,and Los Angeles and Orange County employers kept pace with local streets and roads needs in the Coachella Valley. Cities and r county There are considerable federal and state funds available to match local dollars for the are also faced with the problems of an aging system and L the provision of rail transit service. ft is the intent of this Improvement Plan to potholes_ The Measure A funds would supplement existing federal state.and match to the maximum event possible these federal and state funds for the local funds. local street improvements ediscent to new residential and business implementation of commuter rail service to both Los Angeles and Orange developments will continue to be paid for by the developers. The greatest need is for maintenance and rehabilitation of the existing city and county road system. Counties. his anticipated that this program will involve a cooperative plan to be Current resources cover only 25%of the pavement maintenance needs. funded by Riverside.San Bernardino.Los Angeles and Orange Counties The Coachella Valley Association of Governments will play a role in determining In order for Riverside County to be able to qualify for full state matching funds for commuter rail.Measure Don this same ballot will need to be passed by the vote allocations to local governments for streets and roads. Local streets and roads r.This will allow Riverside County to be allocated a share of the funds will be provided to Coachella Valley cities and the county if they participate law.set aside from the million per year in the uniform Traffic Mitigation lee program to assist in financing the pnonty which the Caillorn Transportation Commission must.by Regional Arterial System_ H local agencies choose not to levy the additional stare highway account for rail transit developer fees,the funds they would otherwise receive for local streets and roads will be added to the Measure A funds for the Regional Arterial System. In ammeteril Ro Cast Range addition.the Coachella Valley Association of Governments will have the discretion t .n) to provide a portion of these lands to increase funding for speciahre transit ail Renee Limits Preened ( Milfi programs for seniors and handicapped people,bus replacement or other trerein mallet to Riverside to Los Angeles and Commuter rail on existing *100.0 proprsons which may improve air quality. ae 91. Orange Counties lines •10 and The Coachella Valley Improvement Plan anticipates that from$84 to$96 million of 215 the funds will be available for local streets and roads protects. Allocations of funds to the cities and the County will be based on a formula weighted 50%on Riverside County's share of funds for these projects will come from a highway and proportionate dwellmg units and 50%on Measure A revenues generated within commuter rail transportation account of$339 mil4at III each jurisdiction. Five year Capital Improvement Programs will be prepared and annually updated within each city and the County with public participation. OACISELLA VALLEY 3. Discount Fares and Mere Transit Service for Seniors and Ifaadicepped is Transportation Improvement Plan generally illustrates the proposals for the nachella Valley Area. The area includes the cities of Cathedral City.Coachella.Desert Discount transit fares for seniors lege 60 and older)and handicapped people are of Springs, Indian Wells. Indio.La Quints.Palm Desert.Palm Springs. and Rancho now one-half the normal tare for fixed route transit service for most of the day tune. It also includes the major unincorporated areas and a substantial amount of within the Coachella Valley area. Measure A funds will be used to guarantee iore sparsely populated county areas. reduced fares for 20 years. In addition.Measure A funds will be used to provide further reductions for the truly needy. Funds will be used to expand extstmg 1. State Highways and Maier Regional Road Projects services and implement new services. Ways to do this include providing vans and operating assistance to social service agencies.contracts for evening taxi Fihy-five percent of the Measure A funds generated within the Coachella Valley service for medical purposes. and an outreach program to advise seniors and will be used for state highways and major regional road projects. The Coachella handicapped people of all available transit services. The intent of this program is Valley area is served by few state highways. The proposed Regional Arsenal to provide service to those with no other means of transportation. Funding for System developed through the Coachella Valley Association of Governments this program would come from$12 million of the retail transaction and use tax would function much like state highways to address future needs far the nee. farads sal aside for specialized transportation programs. Of the 55%share.about one-quaver will supplement federal and state funds for 4 Cenmeeter buses.Carpools sad Vamped% the following elate highway projects: A systematic program to encourage the use of commuter buses,carpools and vanpools is also proposed for the Coachella Valley. This program would be Last Range particularly beneficial to get employees to seasonal jobs in the Desert hospitality Route Limits Protect ($Mom) industry. It will also improve air quality within the Coachella Valley. The Rte 86 Dillon Road to Oasis Construct 4-lane freeway 1 55.7 commuter bus component will consist of express buses serving major work locations. The use of carpools and vanpools will also be encouraged by Rte 111 Ramon to Indio Boulevard Various operational 20.0 improving computer assisted ridesharmg matching programs,encouraging positive improvements incentives by major employers and providing 'seed' moony for the start up of varpoel groups for initial vehicle purchase.insurance and related costs. Funding All Spaced per standard/all Augment highway cell box 1.0 for this program would come from the $12 million sat aside for specialized highways funding transportation programs. Contingencies 2.8 6. Bea replacement and Mere Service TOTAL a 711.6 Sut hne Transit Agency does not have enough federal and state funds to replace 1111 3-07 their buses as they wear out Despite continuous maintenance and periodic t Bases far Cost Ea asa rehabilitation. the need to replan the fleet within the nert 20 years is anticipated. Replacement buses would also meet more stringent air pollution All cost estimatu within this improvement Plan are preliminary and are based on 1988 values. Future costs may increase du.to inflation or other factors beyond ontrol requirements. Funding may also be needed for sale tol bus s•rvical the c.nud of the Commission. 1988 cost estimates are to be used to determine 0 he Coachella Valley Association of Governments may provide up an additional the proportionate distribution of funds by area and category of transportation f 12 million. Vrogram- PALO VERGE VALLEY 3. State Highway sad Comsener Rail Programs The Palo Verde Valley rs located on the to eastern side of Riverside County. It is �• state highway prow! costs include engtretritsQ right-of-way geographically separated and remote from the Western and Coachella Valley a. g and long-term loses,and construction. Funds are intended to areas. The0 eapopulation t anticipated. the area is relatively small and significant growth over supuisitsoo pplement existing Federal and state sources —not replace them At the next 20 years is not anucipat.d. gym,50%of the funds for the highway protects listed in the Plan should Interstate 10 as a divided freeway providing adequate coins from state and federal sources. B it is determined that Riverside connections to more co Palo Verde Valleyis served by County is not receiving its fair share of existing funds.sales to funds may be westerly portions of Riverside County and cut to Arizona. ktcrau- redirected to Defer types of transportation needs. ed transit needs can be adequately met from existing available sources. The greatest need within the Palo Verde Valley area is additional funding to maintain and rehabilitate b. Commuter Rail protects are anticipated to be on existing rail lines to Los local streets and roads. Angeles and Orange Counties.or internal to Riverside County If commuter rail service is to occur.railroads must agree to a Plan to use their right-ol-way All used the S local millionno road A funds to be returned bedistributed t the Palot Verde Valleyy are to be and trat�an agency for implementation of a multi-county system must be forof Riverside streets end roads. he Funds shallbe t the 5%ity of proportionatepo and ate created. funding must be secured for on-going operations if a subsidy is County and2 by on sales The formula duutbwwn is based s5%on required and state and/or federal and other county funding participation must population and 25% sales to revenues generated in each Wnstimwn. be seared. Measure A R Allocations c. The scope of highway and commuter rail projects to be implemented is to be It ems) determined through requited environmental analysis and full consideration of alternatives Public participation during the environmental analysis process is required. Western County Area 5339.0 Highways and Commuter Rail Account _ _ d. The Commission shall establish a "State Highway and Commuter Rail Streets and Roads Account 247.0 Transportation Account"for funding capital expenditures for state highways cad commuter rail. This account will consist of 60%of the Measure A loads 1 Specialued Transportation Account 31.0 for the Western Canty area and 15%of the funds for the Coachella Valley area. Total We County Area Measure A Fluids 8617.0 4. Specialized Tramtpeststiee Programs 411111ella Valley Area a. Eligible transit programs include special discount fares for seniors and Highways and Regional Arterial Account 8132.0 handicapped people•commuter bus services funding for computer assisted ndeshare programs. and -seed- programs to encourage the creation of 84.0-96.0 • vanpools. Bus capital replacement and additional bus service may also be local Streets and Roads Accounten eligible program within the Coachella Valley.subfect toe determination of Specialized Transportation Account 12.0-24.0 funding by the Coachella Valley Association of Governments. Total Coachella Valley Measure A Fonds $240.0 b. The Commission shall establish a "Specialized Transportation Programs Account-for funding these programs. The Commission shall determine to which public transportation or specialized transportation service operators.or Palo Verde Valley Area carpool/vanpool facilitating agencies. shall receive funding assistance. Local Streets and Roads Account S 13.0 Based on 20 year funding estimates.the amount of funds should be 130.8 million for the Western County area and S 12 million for the Coachella Valley Total Palo Verde Valley Area Measure A Fends a 13.0 Area. TM fund for the Coachella Valley may increase up to an additional 812 million for Sullins Transit Agency capital replacement.at the discretion TOTAL 20 YEAR MEASURE A REVENUES 8670A of the Coachella Valley Association of Governments. I. Local Sufism and Reads Projects GENERAL PROVISIONS OF THE IMPROVEMENT PLAN a- Eligible local street and road project costs include any engineering,capital or 1. Basis for Havasu Estimates maintenance cost. Decisions on protects are to be made by local jurisdictionns.but subject to Capital Improvement Program requirments.The ent local first five year program shall be submitted to the Commission by Federal and state participation for highway and commuter rail funding is baudagencies by May 1. 1989. upon an assumed statewide SI billion annual capacity expanding program_ (Es' clotting highway rehabilitation and safety improvement protecs.) Riverside b. Annual population estimates used for the distribution formula for the Western County s"R0 countyminimum" rears of this t 20%0nt is assumed tobe about fc s County and Palo Verde Valley areas shall be from the State Department of million. Reflecting the which need tort inch about sof these funds for promos Finance. Dwelling unit estimates used for the distribution Iormula for the Plan.the assumedy ue a an not funding in this 820sporion pn r year.improvement Coachella Valley snail be from the Riverside County Planing Department. Plan.the federal and sou It proge s about Ow million per year. This Actual State Board of Equalization retail sales uansacuons shall be used for is approximately 50%of the highway projects with fleas Plan. De artmeat the formula is all three areas for aria. The County areas Planningfor the three shall estimate the share for each of the unincorporated assumed revenue estimates have not been adjustedwill to reHecr inflation his areas. from the total retail sales transactions for the total unincorporated assumed that inflation related revenue increases will be offset by inflating protect costs. "Real growth" is assumed to parallel county-wide population growth area. Prudent growth rates of the State Department of Finance have been used—4.5% ill to 1990.3.5%to 1995.and 2.5%thereafter. Based upon Mess c. The lion nissi•n shall assume the cities' and county compliance with i. Measure A revenues over he 20 year period era assumed to be ab o fart total area. aaace al efface funding requirements before allocating lends for local bout f870 streets and roads. Further.the Commission shall not allocate funds to an million. 1 indrvidr al city or the County for local streets end road use within the Coaclr•Wa Ti. Comriuumae may also use bonus to spaeo mmpnementahon co some r all-y a.ee -less the Coachella Valley Association of 6o in/tient,indicates projects. Bonding will not be used without first determining Mat the benefits of participation of that agency in the Uniform Traffic Mitigation Fee program an acclratad magma eufwergh dm additional cm of inuraat on borrowed - necessary Ice implementation of the planed Regional Arterial System. , funds. . d. The Commission shall establish a "local Straits and Roadi Program 7. Mfer.r.,de Pubic ell local Faodi.g Suppers Account" Based on 2D year funding estimates.the amount of funds should be 3 216 million for the Westem County area.end from 184 to 396 million for All state highway.mummer rail and regional arterial projects using 3 I million or the Coachella Valley Area. more of sales in revenues shall he signed to inform this public that local voter IIIapproved funnies are being toad to support the project Fending Flaabihly sad Beading re E:paufrte Program • I. Sunman Pres:aim The commission may make maximum use of evadable fund:by temporality shifting Improvement of this Plan is for any mason held inn afid or Miamians between geograpiwc areas and transportation purposes. However, If If an provision the proportionate shares for areas or the purposes over the 20 year period may not anenforaable by a court of competent jurisdiction.brat hofdmg shall not abut me • be changed without an amendment to the Improvement Plan as required by velidity or enforceability of the remaining provisions.and the Commission declares law. Shifts may not be made without previous consultation with the affected that it would have passed each part of this Plan irrespective of the validity of any agencies. Adler►an. • MEASURE A: RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN Major Highway,Arterial,Commuter Rail, and Transit Projects f!od Irmo . Loud Mown end toed local bars.Dlee-A-Rhdal and aid rfv bo.enpnovernhs not shown ne so.e pALO VERDE VALLEY I t'• 4 o • a gerM • • •• .• • •e•e• • •to M..O• rwo n ee 1/w•Oe • • r, ...-s•c:11. ••�•t.. .♦ 0 . •r•a LEY • a.aa...s \ .. . • 0.,• d, • 110 nywen•w an • w• 'nrlOr e D w..00...MN• •w•a,.a••• • • ..— L� • rA ..atatar.. 110marr•.euw owl..■•••••••. •rerea •o.. WE& v • tw..r M.en 141E rat.14.n•►an/ wens • m.ae a�� Aer..aarrew...w- ue•.oa • el Kw s.err. to • •• ••• it—enaeGrewd melee -1•a. / , a. list es Ampries one ee•w e•••.im • 00 O Op Clow r'.•aarar C•sw•r w r Wm.. • Cw s...rwows award • • • Caaw+e..er Ow Cog wil �.if M_.••mil - S. WESTERN COUNTY f COACHELLA VALLE Y 1 IF LARGER SCALE MAP REQUIRED PLEASE CALL (714) 787-2921 III ___ __- _:_,":„..2 -____2, 7._ _ may=;, r �-- RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION C. .i......, III June 12, 1995 TO: Riverside County Transportation Commission FROM: Paul Blackwelder, Deputy Executive Director SUBJECT: Measure A "STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT SUMMARY REPORT" The "STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT SUMMARY REPORT" was presented to the Commission by Dr. Daniel Moore of Moore lacofano Gottsman, Inc;'Moderator, at the June meeting. The report contains a summary of the issues, goals, and trends related to transportation as well as the RCTC Measure A Expenditure Plan which was discussed during the RCTC Retreat held at Highland Springs Conference Center on May 19 and 20, 1995. The Retreat was designed for several purposes: 4111 A. To provide new Commissioners an overall knowledge of the Measure A Program and significant progress to date. B. To identify the issues and trends impacting comprehensive transportation planning for Riverside County. C. To develop a sequence for future project development work and construction of the projects identified but not yet constructed in the Measure A Highway Program for the Western Riverside County area. The Project Sequencing recommendations developed through the Retreat and for approval by the Commission will be used to complete the Measure A Strategic Plan Section, in which each project will be identified in its relative priority and assigned an expected source of funding for future work through construction. The information developed regarding Trends, Issues and Goals will be available to Comnit'tsioners in future discussions with elected representatives from the various local agencies throughout the county regarding the need for comprehensive transportation planning for Riverside County, and the appropriate roles of the various agencies such as the RCTC, CVAG, WRCOG, Cattrans, the cities and counties to produce a plan and work to provide the highways, arterial, and local roads which will be needed as we continue to develop. 4 Measure A "Strategic Planning Retreat Summary Report" June 12, 1995 _ Page 3 �' ") • to reflect changes in funding assumptions and/or other issues which may significantly impact the ability of the Commission to provide transportation improvements. We also expect that the Measure A Highway Program project list will become the starting point for development of a larger list of Highway and Arterial needs for Riverside County developed through a cooperative planning process with the cities and county and which, while not representative of the total transportation needs, does identify the those projects which should be viewed as likely candidates for the use of other federal and state revenues such as the Surface Transportation Program and Congestion Management and Air Quality Mitigation funding provided through the federal ISTEA funding program. RECOMMENDATION That the Commission: 1 . Approve the MEASURE A PROJECT SEQUENCING as identified in the attached table, marked as Page 11 on the Report and discussed above. 2. Direct staff to distribute the report to affected local agencies for review and to request comments from the agencies and returned to the Commission within 60 days. 3. Bring back the project list and comments received from the local agencies to the Commission at their October meeting for final approval of the project sequence list and staff develop a proposal for programming expected future federal/state (STIP) and Measure A funding with timeframe for completion of project development and construction needed for each of the identified projects. NK Snaugrc Planning Retreat Iwt 14.I99 • MEASURE A PROJECT SEQUENCING • 1. 215 60/91/215 IC 1st connector 2- 215 60/91/215 IC to University 3. 60 Valley Way to 60/91/215 4. 215 University to 60/215 5• 215 MLK IC 6. 91 Cridge thru 60/91/215 IC 7• 91 Mary to Cridge 8• 215 60/91/215 IC 2nd connector (S.B. to Moreno Valley) 9. 91 Magnolia to Mary(aux.lane) 10. LC-IC Van Buren at 91 iL 215 60/215 IC truck bypass 12. 215 Univ. to 60/215 (truck lane) 13. 60 60/215 to Redlands • 14. 74 I-15 to Perris 15. 79 Newport to Keller 16. LC-IC La Sierra at 91 17. LC-IC Adams at 91 mg 74 G Street at I-215 IC 19. JD-IC Galena 20. 215 60/91/215 to San Bernardino County line 21. LC-IC Day at 60 22• LC-IC Valley Way at 60 23- LC-IC Frederick at 60 24. 91 OC to Magnolia 2nd Lane 25. San Jacinto Rail • Rwersaie County Traspnrerr at Camomile Awe n • 0.4114111011114.10 .2114 Staff Report S A N JACINTO TO: Honorable Mayor & City Councilmembers FROM: John Herrera, Finance Director via: Pamela Easter, City Manager DATE: September 19, 1995 RE: ADOPTION OF 1995-96 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CITY BUDGETS RECOMMENDATION: It is respectfully requested that the City Council adopt Resolution No. RDA 95- and Resolution No. 95- that approve the Fiscal Year 1995-96 Redevelopment Agency and City budgets. It is also requested that Council give direction on specific items as they appear in the Background section of this staff report. • BACKGROUND: During the recent series of budget sessions, Council discussed several changes to the proposed budget. Council needs to provide direction to staff on the following items: * Proposed Customer Service Representative II position. * Outside agencies' requests for funding. * Police Department staffing levels. * Council conference, training, and education account, along with the consider'tion that Council receive compensation in their Redevelopment Agency rose. In addition, as part of the budget adoption, the Council will be doing the following: * Endorsing the City's investment policy as shown in the attached previously adopted Resolution No. 2136. • Staff Report/September 19, 1995 • Adoption of Budget Page Two Adopting the departmental goals and priorities for 1995-96. Approving a $15,591 increase in 010-4150-410-1001 to reflect the computer linking error on page 119 of the budget. The total personnel line item should be $123,560, not $109,698 and the fringe benefit line increased by $1,729 to reflect actual cost. The fiscal impact of the $15,591 is a decrease in the estimated June 30, 1996 fund balance reserve in the General Fund. The June 30, 1996 General Fund reserve was estimated at $104,637 and will need to be revised downward to $89,046 due to the $15,591 adjustment. Further budget changes by Council in the General Fund will also cause impact to the fund balance reserve. Upon approval of the above budget changes, staff will prepare a Final budget reflecting Council's actions. Staff expect to have a Final budget completed for distribution by the end of October. Staff will also work hard to compile unaudited 1994-95 "actual" expenditure detail history to be included in the Final budget document. • • Memorandum TO: Honorable Mayor & Councilmembers FROM: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: September 14, 1995 RE: FOLLOW UP FROM COUNCIL BUDGET STUDY SESSIONS/PART II - (CONTINUATION OF PART I MEMO DATED SEPTEMBER 5, 1995) 1. Are customers in Lake Hemet and EMWD charged an equitable amount in property tax/franchise fees to our City's water district? Answer: As a taxing agency, EMWD and Lake Hemet do receive property tax funds. + it/`1 = /l5 a s- s . • 2. Number of people who attend the San Jacinto Museum. Answer: 1985 - 8,856; 1992 - 9,565; 1994 - 8,055 Approximate attendance (average) last five years - 8,000 3. Status of business kiosk and directional sign program. Answer: We will be contacting the Chamber as to the status of this new proposed kiosk program. 4. Work with Day Care Center on a revised agreement and review rental fees. Answer: This will be included in the staffs 1995-96 program of work. 5. Have the Mayor send a letter to Valley-Wide Chairman on joint maintenance of parks. Answer: This will be completed by the end of September. 6. Have the Mayor send letter to Edison to help defray electrical costs of • pool/Community Center. Answer: This will be completed by the end of September. Study Session Budget Questions • Page Two September 14, 1995 7. Do a history of workers' compensation liability costs over the last five years. Answer: This is currently being researched by our staff and will be provided to the Council under separate cover. 8. Can the City save money by contracting out its payroll function? Answer: Staff requests nine months to complete an analysis and staff report on this option. 9. How are we accounting for employee computer purchases? Answer: Non-probationary employees select their computer system from one of the supply houses. A copy of the invoice (not to exceed $3,000) is returned with a computer agreement (signed by the employee's department head) to the Finance Department for approval by the Director and City Manager. A check is issued to the vendor and an accounts receivable is set • up. The employee then pays off their interest free loan from payroll deductions bi-monthly. The term of the loan is not to exceed 24 months. Approximately 25-30 employees are participating in this program. 10. What is the City's cost of one city-wide mailing? Answer: If we continue with our current format of a folded 11 x 16 sheet (no envelope), the cost of printing and postage is approximately $1,900 per newsletter. • • RESOLUTION NO. RDA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ACTING IN THEIR CAPACITY AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1995 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1996 THE CITY COUNCIL ACTING IN THEIR CAPACITY AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Budget for the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1995, and ending June 30, 1996 is hereby approved and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A". SECTION 2. The Approved Budget is in accordance with all applicable ordinances of the City, Redevelopment Agency and all applicable statutes of the State. The reallocation of appropriations between departmental activities may be made upon approval of the Executive Director, providing there is no change in the total appropriations as approved by the Agency Members. • SECTION 3. Amendments to the Budget shall be by approval and Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency Members. SECTION 4. The Secretary shall certify the adoption of the Budget and shall cause it to be filed with the County Auditor, within 60 days of the adoption, along with a certified copy of the Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of September, 1995. Ayes: Noes: Abstain: Absent: Chairman ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk CERTIFICATION The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. RDA duly adopted by said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth • therein. Deputy City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1995 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1996 THE CITY COUNCIL ACTING OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Budget for the City of San Jacinto for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1995, and ending June 30, 1996 is hereby approved and adopted, and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A:. SECTION 2. The Approved Budget is in accordance with all Applicable ordinances of the City and all applicable statutes of the State. SECTION 3. The reallocation of appropriations between departmental activities may be made by the City Manager. Amendments (Increases/Decreases) to the Budget shall be by approval and Resolution of the City Council SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of the Budget and shall • cause to be filed with the County Auditor, within 60 days of the adoption. a certified copy of the budget and Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of September, 1995. Ayes: Noes: Abstain: Absent: Mayor ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk CERTIFICATION The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. 95- duly adopted by said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein. Deputy City Clerk • • RESOLUTION NO. 2136 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO IDENTIFYING VARIOUS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES TO ENSURE A PRUDENT AND SYSTEMATIC INVESTMENT POLICY AND TO ORGANIZE AND FORMALIZE INVESTMENT-RELATED ACTIVITIES. WHEREAS, it is the purpose of this Policy to identify various policies and procedures that enhance opportunities for a prudent and systematic investment policy and to organize and formalize investment-related activities . Related activities which compromise good cash management include accurate cash projections, the expeditious collection of revenue, the control of disbursements, cost-effective banking relations, and a short-term borrowing program which coordinates working capital requirements and investment opportunity. In concert with these requirements are the many facets of an appropriate and secure short-term investment program. WHEREAS, it is intended that this policy cover all funds and investment activities under the direct authority of the City of San Jacinto. 4111 WHEREAS, the objectives of this policy are : A. Safety: It is the primary duty and responsibility of the Treasurer to protect , preserve and maintain cash and investments placed in his/her trust on behalf of the citizens of the community. B . Liquidity: An adequate percentage of the portfolio should be maintained in liquid short-term securities which can be converted to cash if necessary to meet disbursement requirements . Since all cash requirements cannot be anticipated, investments in securities with active secondary or resale markets is highly recommended. Emphasis should be on marketable securities with low sensitivity to market risk. C. Yield: Yield should become a consideration only after the basic requirements of safety and liquidity have been met . D. Market-Average Rate of Return: The investment portfolio shall be designed to attain a market-average rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the City' s risk constraints, the cash flow characteristics of the portfolio, and State and Local laws, ordinances or resolutions that restrict investments . • E. Diversification: The investment portfolio will be diversified to avoid incurring unreasonable and avoidable risks regarding specific security types or individual financial institutions . Investment Policy i Page 2 F. Prudence: The City adheres to the guidance provided by the "prudent man rule" , which obligates a fiduciary to insure that : " . . . investment shall be made with the exercise of that degree of judgement and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation but for investment considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. " G. Public Trust: All participants in the investment process shall act as custodians of the public trust . Investment officials shall recognize that the investment portfolio is subject to public review and evaluation. The overall program shall be designed and managed with a degree of professionalism that is worthy of the pubic trust . In a diversified portfolio it must be recognized that occasional measured losses are inevitable, and must be considered within the context of the overall portfolio' s investment return, provided that adequate diversification has been implemented. WHEREAS, Government Code Section 53607 permits the ill "Legislative Body" to delegate the authority to invest or reinvest the City funds or to sell or exchange securities so purchased, to the "Treasurer" of San Jacinto, who shall hereafter assume full responsibility for such transactions until such time as the delegation of authority is revoked by the legislative body. WHEREAS, the Treasurer or Finance Director shall submit a monthly investment report to the City Council . This report will include all required elements of the monthly report as prescribed by Government Code Section 53646 . Minimum required elements of the monthly report : a. type of Investment b. Institution c. Date of Maturity d. Amount of deposit or cost of the security e . Current market value of securities with maturity in excess of 12 months f . Rate of interest g. Statement relating the report to the Statement of Investment Policy h. Statement that there are sufficient funds to meet the next 30 days' s obligations i . Effective January 1, 1991, Accrued Interest as prescribed by the California Code Section 53646 , • if required by the City Council . Investment Policy Page 3 Additional information may be included in the monthly report, but is not required by the Government Code . Some items that might be included are : * Interest earned to date * Average weighted yield * Average days to maturity * Actual transactions * Percent distribution to each type investment WHEREAS, it is the Treasurer' s option to submit a quarterly or Annual report of a Statement of Investment Policy to the City Council with a more detailed or expansion report of investments . WHEREAS, security purchases and holdings will be maintained within statutory limits imposed by the Government Code . WHEREAS, a System of internal control shall be established. The controls shall be designed to prevent losses of • public funds arising from fraud, employee error, misrepresentation of third parties, unanticipated changes in financial markets, or imprudent actions by employees and officers of the City of San Jacinto. Controls deemed most important include : control of collusion, separation of duties, separating transaction authority from accounting and recordkeeping, custodial safekeeping, clear delegation of authority, specific limitations regarding securities losses and remedial action, written confirmation of telephone transactions , minimizing the number of authorized strategies , and code of ethics standards . WHEREAS, the Treasurer shall consider the creditworthiness of financial institutions in selecting for the deposit of investment of City funds . The Treasurer or Finance Director shall continue to monitor financial institutions' credit characteristics and financial history throughout the period in which City funds are deposited or invested. WHEREAS, the City recognizes that investment risks can result from issuer defaults, market price changes or various technical complications leading to temporary illiquidity. Therefore, Portfolio diversification will be employed as a way to control risk. The Treasurer and/or Finance Director is/are expected to display prudence in the selection of securities, and a way to minimize default risk. No individual investment transaction 41110 shall be undertaken which jeopardizes the total capital position of the overall portfolio. The Treasurer shall periodically establish guidelines and strategies to control risks of default , market price changes and illiquidity. Investment Policy • Page 4 WHEREAS, in addition to these general policy considerations, the Treasurer and Finance Director will strictly observe the following specific policies . A. All transactions will be executed on a delivery versus payment basis . B. A Competitive bid process, when practical , will be P used to place all investment purchases . WHEREAS, all securities owned by the City should be held by a third party except the collateral for time deposits in banks and savings and loans . Collateral for time deposits in banks and savings and loans will be held by the Federal Home Loan Bank. the collateral for time deposits in banks will be held in the name of the City of San Jacinto in the bank' s Trust Department or alternately, in the Federal Reserve Bank. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Jacinto adopts the Investment Policy. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED the 29 day of June, 1993 by the ED following vote : AYES : 5 Ford, Leahy, Williams , Solorio, Hafliger NOES : 0 ABSENT: 0 QdtE) // y r ATTEST: 12Asuo-)- c.: By Deputy City Clerk • _ r �M Sta f Report S A N JAc1T" TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Larry L. Weaver, Interim Finance Director via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: September 19, 1995 SUBJECT: Appropriation Limit For Fiscal Year 1995-96 RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution establishing the Fiscal year 1995-96 appropriation limit. BACKGROUND: • Each year the City must set their appropriation limit. The factors used for setting San Jacinto's limit are Per Capita Personal Income of 4.72 percent and population 0.64%. Fiscal Year 1994-95 appropriation limit was $11,148.564.00 which was adopted by Resolution No. 2208. The calculation for the Fiscal Year 1995-96 appropriation limit is shown below: Per Capita Personal Income 4.72 + 100 = 1.0472 100 Population Change 0.64 + 100 = 1.0064 100 Growth factor calculation for Fiscal Year 1995-96: 1.0472 * 1.0064 = 1.0539 • FY 1994-95 limit $11,148,564.00 * 1 .0539 = $11,749,472.00 for the FY 1995-96 appropriation limit. RESOLUTION NO. 95- • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SPENDING LIMITATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995- 96 WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the California Constitution provides for the establishment of a formal spending limitation; and WHEREAS, the spending limitation for Fiscal Year 1995-96 totals $11 ,749,472 adjusted by Per Capita Personal Income and January 1 , 1995 population change. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Fiscal Year 1995-96 spending limitation is hereby established as $11,749,472 subject to later adjustments for annexations, transfer and newly assumed services and newly established fees. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of September, 1995, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: • ABSENT: ABSTAIN: David Solorio. Mayor ATTEST: Bob Wilson, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk S _____4„. .....,.....__..,. ..-. - -- rrbe f4 -7 . . ___. ......... or----" Staff Report S A N JACINTO TO: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development Nathaniel Holmes, Chief of Police - John Herrera, Finance Director Rod Butler, Assistant to the City Manager via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: September 19, 1995 RE: 1995-96 BUDGET - UTILITY USER'S TAX • RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff as appropriate. BACKGROUND: The City Council has reviewed a possible utility user's tax, as well as a possible special tax, a number of times in the recent past. Previous staff reports included a discussion of increased staffing needs for all departments. The proposed FY 1995-96 budget makes the following reductions in staff and adjustments in responsibility: * Police a. Reduces sworn officers from 25 to 24 b. Eliminates participation in a regional drug enforcement unit c. Eliminates the transcription service d. Splits the Community Services Officer's time between that function and Code Enforcement ID 1 Development Services • a. Proposes Information Planner position not be filled b. Proposes Code Enforcement Officer position not be filled Public Works a. Proposes Mechanic position not be filled The Council realized that instead of satisfying any portion of the staffing needs of the City's various departments, it was reducing department staffing. As a result, service level provided to the public was being reduced. Therefore, staff was directed to bring back, again, an utility user's tax for consideration. Although there were no other specific instructions from the City Council, issues that have been discussed in the past included a commitment of the tax proceeds to public safety; whether the tax should be a percentage of the utility bill or a flat rate; which utilities it should attached to; whether there should be exemptions; and whether there should be some sort of "sunset" provision. The following sections of this report discuss these various issues. Additionally, this report discusses the possible uses of the tax revenue as well as the timing for implementation. TAX CALCULATION Exhibits "A" and "B" are examples of spread sheets that the staff would use to determine the amount of tax necessary. A similar format can be used to determine the tax necessary to support the needs of any department. Throughout this report, however, we have used the Police Department as a reference point due to the extensive amount of work previously done related to the exploration of a special tax. Points of variation in an analysis for other departments would include population and staffing, as they are not necessarily used as measures for staffing in all departments. The two exhibits are identical except Exhibit "A" shows the tax as a percentage of overall utility sales. Exhibit "B" shows a flat monthly tax charge. Although there has been previous discussion of establishing a sunset provision, the exhibits do not reflect this because we needed to see how a tax will withstand the test of time. The trends over time are very important for the Council to understand. The first column on the spread sheets is the year. The first listing in this column is entitled budget. This row is reflective of the FY 1995-96 Budget on which you have been deliberating. -2- • • The next line entitled FY 96 is a possible Police Budget for the Year 1995-96, if additional General Fund revenue is available as a result of an utility user's tax. The Population column reflects a 1% growth rate for the first five years, then a 2% growth rate. This is a very low growth rate compared to the growth rates we experienced in the mid 80's to the early 90's. The Staffing is tied to the population at a ratio of 1.3 officer per 1000 people. The General Fund Revenue has been kept constant for all ten years and is based on the General Fund projections contained in the 1995-96 budget proposal. The main reason for not inflating the General Fund is the instable/unpredictable flow of General Fund revenue. While it seems reasonable that the General Fund revenue will increase with population growth (in a four year period from 1988-1992, the General Fund grew 6% annually), recent experience has shown the General Fund decreasing as the population increased. The population increased from January 1, 1994 to January 1, 1995 by .87%, while the revenue projected to be received in FY 1995-96 is 1%, less than FY 1994-95. The Police General Fund Expenditure reflects an expenditure of 61.8% of the General Fund Revenue or $2,166,259. If the Council votes to impose the utility user's tax, staff recommends that the Council, as a measure of good faith, adopt a resolution which sets • a policy of spending the greater of $2,166,259 or 61.8% of the General Fund Revenue on police services. The Revenue Required column reflects the cost to operate the Police Department at the level designated in the staffing column. The substantial jump in cost between FY 96 and FY 97 is due to the need to fully fund worker's compensation and liability funds as well as the elimination of the CFD No. 1, 2 and 3 Public Safety Tax revenue. The difference between the revenue required and the General Fund expenditures is the amount to be funded by an utility user's tax. Staff has obtained an estimate of the amount of all utilities sales within the city limits, with the exception of phone revenues for which we included a conservative estimate. Based on the overall utility sales, the utility user's tax would have to be 6.2% to provide adequate funding for the 10 year period. As shown in the Exhibit in the Variable column there would be excess revenue in early years, but insufficient revenue in later years. However, over the ten year period, the excess revenue and shortfall are in approximate balance. If the tax were a flat tax, it would have to be created with an automatic inflator in order to insure adequate funding annually. The initial tax would be $12 per month for the first 4 years, and would have to increase to $13 per month in FY 2000. Again, there is an early surplus, but expenditures exceed annual revenue in later years. -3- An important item which the Council needs to be cognizant of is that either rate or • method of taxation is inadequate if growth exceeds the assumptions on the spread sheet. While it is difficult to foresee any substantial economic recovery, it is very possible that the growth rate may stabilize at four or five percent beginning in five or six years. We have not calculated what tax would be necessary should this occur. If the Council wants to try other variables but not vary from the implementation timeline set forth later in the report, staff will have a computer at the meeting to make calculations. Also, if the Council would like specific information on a tax as it relates to other departments, staff would need more time to assemble the appropriate spread sheets. RESTRICTING FUNDS TO POLICE SERVICE State Law authorizes the City Council to adopt an utility user's tax to raise general city revenues. Because it is for general purposes, a vote of the electorate is not required. This is distinguished from a special purpose tax which raises revenues for a special or restricted purpose. This type of tax does require a 2/3 vote of the electorate. Therefore, the City Council cannot establish a special fund in which to deposit utility tax proceeds to be spent only on police service. If the City Council does establish an utility user's tax, the public may want assurances that there will continue to be sufficient funding for police. keeping at least the same level of service currently provided. Even though the Council is aware of the staffing needs of all departments, the public is most concerned with public safety. However, as mentioned previously, staff would recommend the adoption of a Resolution that indicates the Council's desire to spend the greater of 61.8% or $2.166,259 of General Fund revenue on police service. This Resolution is, of course, non-binding on future City Councils. As we have noted above, the same restrictions apply to any desire the Council might have to restrict funds for any specific other department. The law states, and the the courts have confirmed, that utility user's taxes are available to be shared for all other general fund purposes. UTILITY USER'S TAX - PERCENTAGE VS. FLAT RATE From the information staff have gathered from the League of California Cities and other jurisdictions, all Cities except one, that have adopted an utility user's tax, have charged a percentage of utility bills. The only city which adopted a flat rate utility user's tax was Norco. They charge $5.00 per month per residential unit and $10.00 per month per non- residential unit. • -4- • The seeming advantages to a flat tax are the predictability of revenue stream, the potential to involve fewer utilities, and perhaps earlier receipt of revenue. However, it would not automatically adjust for inflation like a percentage would. An inflator would be necessary to avoid losing ground to inflation. The City Attorney, Jim Cox, is least comfortable with the flat tax because of possible fairness challenges. SUNSET PROVISIONS Some jurisdictions which enacted utility user's taxes included a provision that made the tax "sunset" at a certain date. In most, but not all, cases the Council extended the tax. The Council is also in the process of forming a public safety finance citizens' committee which would recommend to the City Council the proper staffing level for police and how to fund this level. This committee or a separate committee could also evaluate staffing and funding for all departments. It would appear to staff that there is a strong possibility that a committee reviewing funding for any department may want to restrict use of new revenues via a special tax. Staff is of the opinion that the only sunset provision which should be included should be • tied directly to the passage of a special tax. Otherwise, future funding of expanded staffing would be jeopardized. One might propose a three year sunset on the utility user's tax. However, at the end of three years, unless there was a significant increase in City revenues either the tax would have to be reinstated or major layoffs would be necessary. It may be more difficult to attract quality employees if they find out funding for their positions is only guaranteed for three years. Although an utility user's tax can be reinstated if it sunsets, there is some risk to this approach. For the last several years, there have been legislative proposals to limit the ability of local governments to impose utility user's taxes without a vote. Each of these pieces of legislation exempts taxes in effect prior to a specific date noted in the legislation. Should such legislation pass. and there was a sunset provision after the exemption date, there may be a legal question as to whether an election was necessary to extend the tax. -5- WHICH UTILITY SHOULD A TAX BE PLACED ON? • The answer to this question depends on whether or not the Council imposes a flat tax or a percentage. If a flat tax is used, it can be placed on either on water or trash bills, or on all utilities. Norco used water bills. If it is a percentage, then it should be placed on all utilities including sewer, water, trash, recycling, electricity, gas, cable, and phone. EXEMPTIONS One of the issues that the Council should give direction on is whether you wish to create any exemptions or discounts to the tax. While most cities do not provide for exemptions, some have. If the Council does create any exemptions, it will have to raise the balance from the rest of the community. The most obvious group to consider for an exemption or discount are lower income households. Other possible exemption/discount categories are schools, religious organizations, non-profits, and industry. Low income households that participate in the various electric, gas, and phone discounts will already be paying less than if they were charged the non-discounted utility rate. Schools are particularly high utility users. However, they are not exempt from any taxes allowed by the Public Utilities Commission. Religious organizations and non-profits are :lot typically as big an utility user as schools, but the argument is the same: they pay 4111111 now, just like everyone else. The only argument against taxing industry is the fact that a tax, particularly on a percentage basis, might be a detriment to economic development efforts. A flat tax is beneficial to industry, but is not fair to the smaller users. POLICE DEPARTMENT FUNDING NEEDS ASSUMPTIONS (STAFFING ONLY) The Police Department expenditures, in our example, are based on fully funding all staff necessary to implement 1.3 officers per 1000 population. The proposed tax does not fund capital facility needs. These needs were discussed in a previous report. In summary, the existing facility is approximately "maxed out" with our current number of patrol personnel. If the police were able to expand into the existing fire facility (at a cost of approximately $136,000), perhaps 24 patrol officers could be accommodated. -6- S The rationale for the 1.3 officers and the breakdown of officer cost follows below: STAFFING: All figures were based upon attaining and maintaining a staffing level of 1 .3 officers per 1 ,000 population. This recommendation was reached based upon FBI statistics which show that cities our size, in the Southwest United States, are operating at 1.5 officers per 1 ,000 population, our activity level and size. As a city grows statistics indicate that the ratio drops to about 1.3 officers per 1,000 population. OFFICER COST CALCULATION Police Officers estimates for costs were based upon the following; Top Step Police Officer Salary $ 39,120.00 Benefits based at 41% 16,040.00 Equipment & M. & O. costs.(est) 6,765.00 Vehicle lease costs 4 years 7,500.00 Support personnel costs @ 35% 19,306.00 Total Per Officer Cost Estimate $ 88,731.00 DEPLOYMENT The revenue proposed would permit the police department to reach a staffing level of 1 .3 officers per 1 .000 population that the City Council has determined should be the appropriate police service level. With this level of police personnel. the community residents will see a dramatic increase in officer visibility. This increase would be readily noticeable in approximately one year once all of the personnel are hired, trained, and deployed. Two staffing options may be used, once the desired number of police officers are on staff and trained. The first would be to initially get crime under control, and the second to implement the Council desires to transition to Community Oriented Policing/Government. The seven officers hired would include a command level officer and 6 patrol personnel. -7- In the first stage/option all of the 6 officers would be assigned to patrol with 1 assigned • to each of the four watches. This would increase the daily staffing to four officers per shift 24 hours per day. The other two officers would be assigned to the night shifts so that on high activity nights we would have from 5 to 7 units on duty. The SCAT unit would be reinstated allowing us to deal with special crime problems (speeding, burglary, Rancho Park vandalism etc.). In the second stage/option we would deploy personnel to implement the City Council desires that we transition to Community Oriented Policing/Government. In this plan, three of the six officers assigned to patrol would be assigned as liaison officers to each of the three beats in the City. Their duties would include conducting crime prevention training, business watch, speaking engagements, and monitoring crime statistics in their beat. In so doing they would identify crime problems, and deploy the appropriate resources to deal with them. (SCAT, Traffic, Detectives, Narcotics teams, or beat officers). Two of the officers would be assigned to high activity night shifts and one would be assigned to the SCAT unit. This would give us the ability to have 4 to 7 units on night shifts, and 4 to 5 units on each day shift. The funding would also permit the Council to continue with a standard vehicle replacement and assigned vehicle program which we initiated in budget year 1994/95. This program, combined with the deployment options outlined, would result in a drastic increase in police presence and visibility on our city streets. As we have stated previously, the same level of analysis can be performed as to staffing • in deployment for all departments if the Council so desires. APPROVAL PROCESS/TIMELINE FOR ADOPTION The adoption of an utility user's tax by a City Council is subject to several provisions of the Brown Act. These provisions primarily relate to the conducting of public meetings and the publishing of public notices for those meetings. City Attorney Cox advises that as a new general tax, an utility user's tax would require at least one "public meeting" in addition to the public hearing at which the Council adopts the utility tax ordinance. At the public meeting, the Council must allow public testimony on the new general tax. In terms of public notice, the City Council is required to provide at least 45 days public notice of the public hearing at which the Council would approve the ordinance. The public meeting, which must be conducted prior to the public hearing, has to be noticed at the same time and in the same document as the notice for the hearing. The joint notice for the two meetings is required to be displayed in an advertisement of "at least one-eighth page" in a newspaper of general circulation at least once a week for three successive weeks. The public meeting can take place no sooner than ten days after the first publication of the joint notice, and there must be at least seven days between the public meeting and the public hearing at which action will be taken. -8- • The Brown Act also includes specific requirements about the content of the published notice. These requirements will be followed by staff in developing the display ad, and the City Attorney will be reviewing the ad prior to its publication. Keeping in mind the Brown Act's requirements as outlined above, staff has developed a proposed timeline for the adoption of an utility user's tax, if in fact the Council chooses to pursue this course. The timeline is as follows: Tuesday, September 19--At the meeting, City Council directs staff to prepare a utility user tax ordinance and begin public notice process. Friday, September 22--First public notice display advertisement in The Hemet News. Friday, September 29--Second public notice display advertisement in The Hemet News. Friday, October 6--Third public notice display advertisement in The Hemet News. Tuesday, October 17--During the regular City Council meeting, Council conducts "public meeting" on the proposed utility user's tax, including opportunity for public testimony. Tuesday, November 7--During regular City Council meeting, the City Council conducts • a public hearing and acts on the proposed utility user's tax ordinance. First reading of the ordinance would occur at this meeting. Tuesday, November 21--If the Council approves the ordinance on first reading at the November 7 meeting, the second reading of the ordinance will be conducted at the regular meeting on November 21. Wednesday, November 22--The tax is effective immediately and the utility companies are notified. The above timeline is designed to correspond with the regular City Council meeting schedule. Obviously, there is some additional flexibility if the Council chooses to use special meetings as part of the process. For your information, the City of Moreno Valley has indicated they began receiving revenue from their utility user's tax about 120 days after adoption of the ordinance. Based on this schedule we may receive revenue around April 1st. Due to the 45 day noticing period, the soonest the ordinance could be adopted is November 13th, which might create revenue a month earlier. • -9- • NEXT STEPS When Council directed staff to return with this report, it appeared that time was of the essence. Therefore, this report did not deal with all departments. If the Council wants to raise more General Fund revenue than this report suggests, staff will need another thirty (30) days to gather the information. If the City Council wishes to proceed with the utility user's tax, based on the information provided, your direction to staff should include: 1. The proposed tax rate - flat or percent /44'os 2. The specific schedule, especially for the public meeting and adoption of the ordinance. 6v� 3. Whether there should be any exemptions/discounts J'1. Whether the tax is to sunset and, if so, when? 5. If a flat tax is chosen, which utility bills to place the tax on, and how much the annual inflator should be. Staff recommends the Consumer Price Index (CPI) be the inflator adjustment. • .49 y 6. Meet with affected utilities to review the proposal 7. Direct staff to meet with the Chamber and any other interested groups to keep them abreast of what is happening and to answer questions. lamer � . ( wn ', �, 3 ye-, -10- . • • • • • EXHBT A.XLS 1995-96 UTILITY USER'S TAX PROPOSAL 1.3 OFFICERS PER 1000 POPULATION YEAR POPULATION STAFFING GENERAL POLICE PCT. UTILITY REVENUE REVENUE VARIANCE FUND GEN.FUND GEN.FUND TAX @6% AVAILABLE REQUIRED REVENUE EXPENDITURE BUDGET 24419 24 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $0 $2,166,259 $2,166,259 $0 FY96 24419 32 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $1,368,545 $3,534,804 $2,920,107 $614,697 FY97 24663 32 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $1,376,756 $3,543,015 $3,473,032 $69,983 FY 98 24910 32 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $1,385,016 $3,551,275 $3,473,032 $78,243 FY99 25159 33 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $1,393,326 $3,559,585 $3,561,763 ($2,178) FY00 25411 33 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $1,401,686 $3,567,945 $3,561,763 $6,182 FY 01 25919 34 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $1,410,097 $3,576,356 $3,650,494 ($74,138) FY02 26437 34 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $1,418,557 $3,584,816 $3,650,494 ($65,678) FY 03 26966 35 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $1,427,068 $3,593,327 $3,739,225 ($145,898) FY 04 27505 36 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $1,435,631 $3,601,890 $3,827,956 ($226,066) FY 05 28055 36 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $1,444,245 $3,610,504 $3,827,956 ($217,452) RIM 111 10 YEAR VARIANCE $37,695 Page 1 '4" • EXHBT_B.XLS 1995-96 UTILITY USER'S TAX PROPOSAL 1.3 OFFICERS PER 1000 POPULATION • YEAR POPULATION STAFFING GENERAL POLICE PCT. FLAT TAX REVENUE REVENUE VARIANCE FUND GEN.FUND GEN.FUND PER MONTH AVAILABLE REQUIRED REVENUE EXPENDITURE BUDGET 24419 24 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $0 $2,166,259 $2,166,259 $0 FY96 24419 32 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $12 $3,421,989 $2,920,107 $501,882 FY 97 24663 32 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $12 $3,473,032 $3,473,032 $0 FY 98 24910 32 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $12 $3,473,032 $3,473,032 $0 FY 99 25159 33 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $12 $3,458,730 $3,561,763 ($103,033) FY00 25411 33 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $13 $3,579,969 $3,561,763 $18,206 FY 01 25919 34 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $13 $3,607,307 $3,650,494 ($43,187) FY 02 26437 34 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $13 $3,650,494 $3,650,494 $0 FY 03 26966 35 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $13 $3,663,635 $3,739,225 ($75,590) FY 04 27505 36 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $13 $3,692,647 $3,827,956 ($135,309) FY 05 28055 36 $3,505,549 $2,166,259 61.80% $13 $3,722,238 $3,827,956 ($105,718) 10 YEAR VARIANCE $57,250 • I • Mr September 15, 1995 Pamela S. Easter, City Manager 312 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 Dear Pam, t ' I am using this letter to reply to your staff agenda item 7.4, for the City Council meeting scheduled for w.'"`- 19 September, 1995, so there will be no misunderstanding of my position on the utility users tax. In reply c tt to page ten(10), titled next steps; I want to base the tax rate on a percentage of the utility bill(I feel that ".A this is fairest to all concerned), the adoption of the ordinance should be as soon as possible(the need is immediate), there should be no exemptions(there is no way that exemptions can be reasonably made 17 without adding a high degree of accounting complexity),the tax should"sunset" on a date as soon as possible after the first election in 1997(this gives the electorate an opportunity to voice their acceptance of a public safety tax need), utility companies should be kept in the loop(they will have to gear up for the added accounting needed), and I see no reason why the Chamber should be given special treatment in this case(this is strictly a City financing matter). About your staff report, specifically; I don't know why you projected the tax for ten years. we specified that this tax would only be a"gap filler" until a city wide CFD tax could be enacted. I also thought we were clear that this tax was to be used exclusively for public safety, why discuss other staffing shortages? Your comment on page 3, concerning"a measure of good faith", with whom?We planned to replace (,z,, , (J 1 J ' 3 CFD's 1, 2, and 3 with a citywide CFD 4 (if enacted by a vote), why did you include the elimination of fed these as a justification for a"substantial jump in cost between FY 96 and FY 97?" The law may not e authorize the City to designate a utility tax to be designated for a specific purpose, we(the Council)should be able to direct it's use for public safety only. The City Manager then should see to it that the Council's wishes are complied with. I realize that future Councils can change that direction. The public safety committee should concern itself with only public safety funding. They will, in effect, recommend a new public safety tax or not, based upon their conviction that such a tax is needed. They will have approximately a year to gather facts and make a recommendation to the Council. Finally,I don't know why you"front loaded"this tax,I figured that a five percent tax would satisfy our need, until the new CFD is passed. That would raise a little over$2,920,000, stated as the need. I believe that normal population growth rate will provide needed increases in revenue. This is a PUBLIC SAFETY TAX. Your staff will have to give the public safety committee facts and figures on what is needed for the CFD 4 tax. The Council, I believe wants the two taxes to be handled separately. Let's not confuse the issue by combining them. Keep it simple. I hope that I have made my position clear, James L. Oaks, Mayor Pro-Tem, City of San Jacinto N Memorandum ( IS A -JAUNT TO: Fellow Members of the City Council FROM: David Solorio, Mayor Patrick Williams, Councilmember DATE: September 19, 1995 RE: Update on Citizens' Public Safety Committee BACKGROUND: The estimated timeline for the Public Safety Financing Citizens' Committee stated that the City Council would be asked to consider committee appointments at our September 5th meeting. Due to additional outreach that we have done to fill unapplied committee categories, this item has been delayed. We plan to bring you recommendations for appointment at our September 26th Study Session or October 3rd Regular Meeting. • •