HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 11/5/2019
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2019
6:30 PM OPEN SESSION
COMMUNITY CENTER
625 S. PICO AVENUE
SAN JACINTO, CA 92583
951-487-7339
City of San Jacinto Page 1 Updated 10/31/2019 2:16 PM
RUSS UTZ, MAYOR
ANDREW KOTYUK, MAYOR PRO TEM
ALONSO LEDEZMA, COUNCILMEMBER
JOEL LOPEZ, COUNCILMEMBER
CRYSTAL RUIZ, COUNCILMEMBER
1. ORGANIZATION
1.1. Roll Call
1.2. Invocation - Pastor Guy Boyer, Valley Community Church
1.3. Pledge of Allegiance - San Jacinto Police Explorers
1.4. Special Presentations
1.4.1. San Jacinto Police Explorers
1.4.2. San Jacinto High School Football Team Captains and Coaches
1.5. Mayor / Council Member Reports / Discussions
1.6. Late Items
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
3. JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS
3.A. Consent Calendar - City Council
3.A.1. Waiver of Full Reading of Ordinance(s), and Reading by Title Only
3.A.2. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of October 15, 2019
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve minutes of the regular City
Council meeting of October 15, 2019.
Department: City Clerk
3.A.3. Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto Page 2 Updated 10/31/2019 2:16 PM
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File Treasurer’s Report for the month ending September 30,
2019.
Department: Finance
3.A.4. Continuing Appropriations - FY 2019-20 Budget Adjustment
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve a continuing appropriation
increase of $544,971 from original designated fund balances for construction-
in-progress projects and various other expenditures encumbered at June 30,
2019 into the FY 2019-20 Budget.
Department: Finance
3.B. Consent Calendar - Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
San Jacinto
4. PUBLIC HEARING
4.1. A proposal of the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, for the Luiseno Village project
located on Ramona Expressway extending between Main Street and Donna Way. To
facilitate the Project, the applicant is requesting: 1) Change of Zone (CZ-17-05) to
change the Zone from CN – Commercial Neighborhood to CG – Commercial
General. 2) Site Plan and Design Review (SPDR17-17) for the review of the overall
site design of a commercial retail center, which includes a 14,583 square foot retail
building, a 9,360 square foot retail building, a service station with a 3,048 square foot
convenience store with off-sale general alcohol sales and a 1,105 square foot car
wash, a 3,200 square foot fast food restaurant, a 2,800 square foot fast food
restaurant, and the design review for the construction of the 14,583 square foot retail
building. 3) Conditional Use Permit (CUP-17-09) to permit a service station with a
3,048 square foot convenience store with off-sale general alcohol sales and a 1,105
square foot car wash. 4) Variance (VAR-17-05) to allow 24 fuel pumps at a single
station where a maximum of 15 are permitted by the Development Code. 5) Minor
Use Permit (MUP-17-09) to permit a fast food restaurant with a drive-through. 6)
Minor Use Permit (MUP-17-10) to permit a fast food restaurant with a drive-through.
7) Minor Use Permit (MUP-17-11) to exceed the City’s parking requirement by more
than five percent.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. DETERMINE that the proposed Project will not have a significant effect on the
environment based on the findings set forth in the case record and:
a. ADOPT A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program (MMRP) pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA); and
2. CONDUCT the second reading and Adopt Ordinance No 19-18 approving
Change of Zone 17-05 to change the Zone from CN - Commercial Neighborhood
City of San Jacinto Page 3 Updated 10/31/2019 2:16 PM
to CG - Commercial General;
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 17-05, A
ZONE CHANGE FROM COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
RAMONA EXPRESSWAY EXTENDING BETWEEN MAIN STREET
AND DONNA WAY (APNs 433-160-024,027,028,029,032,033, and
034)
3. ADOPT Resolution No. 3781 to:
a. APPROVE Site Plan Design Review 17-17 (SPDR-17-17) for the overall site
design of a commercial retail center, which includes a 14,583 square foot retail
building, a 9,360 square foot retail building, a service station with a 3,048 square
foot convenience store with off-sale beer and wine and a 1,105 square foot car
wash, a 3,200 square foot fast food restaurant, a 2,800 square foot fast food
restaurant, and the design review for the construction of a 14,583 square foot
retail building, subject to conditions of approval;
b. APPROVE Conditional Use Permit 17-09 (CUP-17-09) for a service station and
convenience store with off-sale alcohol sales, subject to the conditions of approval
and Variance 17-05 (VAR-17-05) to allow 24 fuel pumps at a single station where
a maximum of 15 are permitted by the Development Code;
c. APPROVE Minor Use Permit 17-09 (MUP-17-09) to permit a 3,200 square foot
fast food restaurant with drive-through service, subject to the conditions of
approval;
d. APPROVE Minor Use Permit 17-10 (MUP-17-10) to permit a 2,800 square foot
fast food restaurant with drive-through service, subject to the conditions of
approval,
e. APPROVE Minor Use Permit 17-11 (MUP-17-11) to exceed the City’s parking
requirement by more than five percent.
Department: Community Development
5. CITY MANAGER UPDATE
6. FUTURE REQUESTS FROM CITY COUNCIL TO STAFF
7. ADJOURNMENT
DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OPEN SESSION AGENDAS (SB343) - Any public record, relating to an
open session agenda item, that is distributed within 72 hours prior to the meeting is available for public
inspection at the public counter located in the Administration Building of City Hall, 595 S. San Jacinto
City of San Jacinto Page 4 Updated 10/31/2019 2:16 PM
Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583.
I, Angela Walton, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that I caused to be posted the
foregoing agenda this 31st day of October 2019 as requested by law.
Angela Walton, City Clerk
November 5, 2019
TO: City Council
REQUESTED BY: Angela Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY: Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve minutes of the regular City Council meeting of
October 15, 2019.
ATTACHMENTS:
10-15-19 Regular Meeting Minutes Draft
3.A.2
Packet Pg. 5
ACTION MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL – REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2019
6:30 PM OPEN SESSION
SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY CENTER
625 S. PICO AVE
SAN JACINTO, CA 92583
951-487-7339
1. ORGANIZATION
Mayor Utz called the Regular City Council meeting to order at 6:35 pm.
1.1. Roll Call
City Clerk Angela Walton conducted the roll call:
Present: Ledezma, Ruiz, Utz
Absent: Kotyuk, Lopez
1.2. Invocation
Pastor Juan Rosas of San Jacinto Assembly of God Church gave the invocation.
1.3. Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Girl Scouts of America Troop #601.
1.4 Special Presentation
Eastern Municipal Water District: Coordination for Mountain Avenue Replenishment
Basin – Joe Mouawad, Assistant General Manager, and Kevin Pearson, Public Affairs
Officer
1.5. Mayor/Council Member Reports / Discussions
Councilmembers provided their reports.
RUSS UTZ, MAYOR
ANDREW KOTYUK, MAYOR PRO TEM
ALONSO LEDEZMA, COUNCILMEMBER
JOEL LOPEZ, COUNCILMEMBER
CRYSTAL RUIZ, COUNCILMEMBER
3.A.2.a
Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: 10-15-19 Regular Meeting Minutes Draft (Minutes)
1.6. Late Items
There were no late items.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Public Speakers:
Sharon Durbin
Habib Motlagh
City Council presented retiring City Engineer Habib Motlagh with a plaque and thanked him
for his twenty-three years of service to San Jacinto.
3. JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS
City Council Consent Calendar Item 3.A. and Successor Agency Item 3.B. Consent
Calendars were heard concurrently.
3.A. Consent Calendar – City Council
3.A.1. Waiver of Full Reading of Ordinance(s), and Reading b y Title Onl y
3.A.2. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of October 1, 2019 / City Clerk /
Approve
3.A.3. Warrants and Disbursements – September 2019 / Finance / Approve
3.A.4. Budget Adjustment – Enterprise Fleet Management / Finance / Approve
3.B. Consent Calendar – Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
San Jacinto
M/S/C (Ruiz/Ledezma) moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 3/0.
Ayes: Ledezma, Ruiz, Utz
Nays: None
Absent: Kotyuk, Lopez
Abstain: None
4. PUBLIC HEARING
4.1. A Proposal of Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians for the Luiseno Village
Project: An ordinance of the city council of the City of San Jacinto, California
approving change of zone 17-05, a zone change from commercial neighborhood to
commercial general located on the west side of Ramona Expressway extending between
3.A.2.a
Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: 10-15-19 Regular Meeting Minutes Draft (Minutes)
Main Street and Donna Way (APN #s 433-160-024, 027, 028, 029, 032, 033, and 034).
City Manager Robert Johnson reported that staff is requesting a continuance of the Public
Hearing to November 5, 2019.
M/S/C (Ruiz/Ledezma) moved to approve the continuation of Public Hearing for a Proposal of
Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians for the Luiseno Village Project to November 5, 2019.
Motion carried 3/0.
Ayes: Ledezma, Ruiz, Utz
Nays: None
Absent: Kotyuk, Lopez
Abstain: None
5. DISCUSSION ITEMS
5.1. SB 2 – Planning Grant Program Update – Permits Plus, Replacement
Program: Receive and File
Travis Randel, Community Development Director, presented the staff report.
6. FUTURE REQUESTS TO STAFF
There were none.
7. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business before the City Council, Mayor Russ Utz adjourned the Regular
Meeting of the City Council at 7:59 pm in honor of the Sandalwood fire victims.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO:
_________________________
Russ Utz, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Angela Walton, City Clerk
Approved as read:
Approved as amended:
3.A.2.a
Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: 10-15-19 Regular Meeting Minutes Draft (Minutes)
November 5, 2019
TO: City Council
REQUESTED BY: Tom Prill, Deputy City Manager
APPROVED BY: Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File Treasurer’s Report for the month ending September 30, 2019.
BACKGROUND:
The Treasurer’s Report is required to be presented to the governing body at least quarterly in
accordance with California Government Code Section 53600 et. seq.
DISCUSSION:
Total Cash and City Investments decreased 4.34% during the month. This includes cash, cash in
bank and cash with trustee.
The attached Treasurer’s report is a “snapshot” report of our cash position on the last day of the
month in all of our accounts. A section demonstrating compliance with the adopted Invest ment
Policy and a chart depicting historical interest rates for certain positions is also included.
Detailed statements of investments from Chandler Asset Management and Public Trust Advisors
have also been included.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
September Report
3.A.3
Packet Pg. 9
TREASURER'S REPORT
FOR THE MONTH ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2019
8/31/2019 9/30/2019 % change 9/30/2019 COMPUTED
INVESTMENT INSTITUTION INTEREST SEPT PURCHASE MATURITY PREV. MONTH CURRENT from prior MARKET ACCR. INT.AVERAGE
TYPE SERIAL #RATE YIELD INTEREST DATE DATE BALANCE BALANCE month VALUE & MKT. VALUE DURATION
STATE POOL L.A.I.F.2.333%2.358%$37,105 Various Open $20,014,141 N $18,014,141 -9.99%$18,132,731 $118,590
MONEY MARKET Bank of Hemet 0.150%0.150%$252 Various Open $2,108,275 Q $2,708,527 28.47%$2,708,527 $0
DEMAND Acct - old Bank of Hemet 0.000%0.000%N/A Various Open $409,050 Q $308,759 -24.52%$308,759 $0
DEMAND Acct - new Bank of Hemet 0.000%0.000%N/A Various Open $69,799 Q $155,174 122.32%$155,174 $0
PAYROLL Account Bank of Hemet 0.000%0.000%N/A Various Open $15,932 Q ($17,756)-211.45%($17,756)$0
MONEY MARKET Mechanics Bank 0.050%0.050%$2 Various Open $52,159 Q $76,714 47.08%$76,714 $0
MONEY MARKET Mechanics Bank 0.200%0.200%$96 Various Open $572,033 Q $547,577 -4.28%$547,577 $0
CCA Lockbox River City Bank 0.000%0.000%$0 Various Open $788,585 Q $1,010,264 28.11%$1,010,264 $0
MANAGED Acct - CAM Chandler / U.S. Bank - Gov't Ob Fund 1.570%1.581%$445 Various Various $203,933 L $138,865 -31.91%$138,865 $0 0.00
MANAGED Acct - CAM Chandler / U.S. Bank - Agency 1.970%1.988%$8,431 Various Various $4,373,284 C $4,486,290 2.58%$4,560,508 $74,218 1.88
MANAGED Acct - CAM Chandler / U.S. Bank - Commercial 2.260%2.284%$0 Various Various $396,427 E $396,427 0.00%$398,570 $2,143 0.16
MANAGED Acct - CAM Chandler / U.S. Bank - US Corporate 2.440%2.467%$7,525 Various Various $2,406,597 F $2,403,104 -0.15%$2,436,407 $33,303 1.97
MANAGED Acct - CAM Chandler / U.S. Bank - US Treasury 2.070%2.090%$6,300 Various Various $2,796,728 A $2,796,728 0.00%$2,857,363 $60,635 1.93
MANAGED Acct - CAM Chandler / U.S. Bank - Asset-Backed Sec.2.530%2.560%$0 Various Various $498,139 J $473,034 -5.04%$476,781 $3,747 1.06
MANAGED Acct - PTA PTA / U.S. Bank - Gov't Ob Fund 1.520%1.531%$33 Various Various $17,703 L $106,766 503.10%$106,766 $0 0.00
MANAGED Acct - PTA PTA / U.S. Bank - Agency 2.609%2.640%$0 Various Various $651,714 C $651,714 0.00%$664,338 $12,624 1.52
MANAGED Acct - PTA PTA / U.S. Bank - Agency CMBS 2.563%2.593%$686 Various Various $319,688 C $319,688 0.00%$325,884 $6,196 2.76
MANAGED Acct - PTA PTA / U.S. Bank - US Corporate 2.157%2.178%$4,334 Various Various $1,668,036 F $1,493,159 -10.48%$1,507,612 $14,453 0.76
MANAGED Acct - PTA PTA / U.S. Bank - US Treasury 2.118%2.139%$34,675 Various Various $7,750,415 A $7,882,684 1.71%$8,010,617 $127,933 2.12
MANAGED Acct - PTA PTA / U.S. Bank - Municipal Bonds 0.000%0.000%$0 Various Various $0 D $0 0.00%$0 $0 0.00
MANAGED Acct - PTA PTA / U.S. Bank - Asset-Backed Sec.2.873%2.911%$0 Various Various $197,430 J $197,430 0.00%$201,184 $3,754 0.14
CASH Cash in EOC Lockbox 0.000%0.000%N/A Various n/a $5,000 Q $5,000 0.00%$5,000 $0
CASH Cash on Hand 0.000%0.000%N/A Various n/a $850 Q $850 0.00%$850 $0
TOTAL CITY INVESTMENTS & FUNDS 2.005%2.023%$99,885 $45,315,918 $44,155,139 -2.56%$44,612,735 $457,596
Annual Return Based on Previous Month Balance 1.834%
RESTRICTED CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT (BOND FUNDS)
Trustee
STREETLIGHT ACQUISITION
Mutual Fund Wilmington Blackrock Liquidity FundsXXXXX3-00X 1.580%1.591%Various Open $464,548 K $458,656 -1.27%$458,656 $0
CFD NO. 2002-1
Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XXXX16090X 2.100%2.120%Various Open $2,768,856 K $1,827,801 -33.99%$1,827,801 $0
2005 RDA SAN JACINTO TAX ALLOCATION BONDS
Mutual Fund Union Bank Blackrock Prov. T-Fund XXXX75750X 2.082%2.102%Various Open $241 K $241 0.00%$241 $0
TOTAL CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT $3,233,645 $2,286,698 -29.28%$2,286,698 $0
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $48,549,563 $46,441,837 -4.34%$46,899,433 $457,596
Page 1
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
TREASURER'S REPORT
FOR THE MONTH ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2019
8/31/2019 9/30/2019 % change 9/30/2019 COMPUTED
INVESTMENT INSTITUTION INTEREST SEPT PURCHASE MATURITY PREV. MONTH CURRENT from prior MARKET ACCR. INT.AVERAGE
TYPE SERIAL #RATE YIELD INTEREST DATE DATE BALANCE BALANCE month VALUE & MKT. VALUE DURATION
PER INVESTMENT POLICY:Maximum %Current %In Compliance?
Level 1 - Investments
U.S. Treasury Bills, Notes and Bonds 100%23%Yes A $10,679,412
Negotiable CDs 30%0%Yes B $0
Obligations issued by U.S. Government Agencies 100%12%Yes C $5,457,692
Municipal Bonds 100%0%Yes D $0
Commercial Paper 25%1%Yes E $396,427
Medium Term Notes 30%8%Yes F $3,896,263
Repurchase Agreements 100%0%Yes G $0
Banker's Acceptances 40%0%Yes H $0
Time Deposits & CDARS 30%0%Yes I $0
Mortgage pass-through / asset-backed securities 20%1%Yes J $670,464
Mutual Funds (Limited to U.S. Treasuries)18%5%Yes K $2,286,698
Mutual Funds (Limited to U.S. Govt. Sec.)18%1%Yes L $245,631
Level 2 - Investments
Money Market Funds (non-brokered)20%0%Yes M $0
LAIF 70%39%Yes N $18,014,141
RCIF 70%0%Yes O $0
Other JPA Pool 50%0%Yes P $0
Cash & Demand Accounts n/a n/a n/a Q $4,795,109
$46,441,837
I CERTIFY THAT THESE INVESTMENTS COMPLY WITH ALL STATE LAWS PERTAINING TO THE INVESTMENT OF LOCAL AGENCY FUNDS AND
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO'S INVESTMENT POLICIES. CITY OF SAN JACINTO MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SIX MONTH CASH FLOW REQUIREMENTS
AS PER GOVERNMENT CODE 53646(b)(3).
KALEENA RICHARDS, TREASURER
City of San Jacinto
Reviewed By: Deputy City Manager - 10/28/2019
Page 2
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
- 0.500 1.000 1.500 2.000 2.500 3.00010/1611/1612/161/172/173/174/175/176/177/178/179/1710/1711/1712/171/182/183/184/185/186/187/188/189/1810/1811/1812/181/192/193/194/195/196/197/198/199/19Interest Rates - 10/16 to 9/19LAIFLAMMA-BoHMMA-RaboPIMMA-RaboChandlerBLX / PTA3.A.3.aPacket Pg. 12Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
MONTHLY ACCOUNT STATEMENT
City of San Jacinto - Account #10167
SEPTEMBER 1, 2019 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2019
Information contained herein is confidential. We urge you to compare this statement to the one you receive from your qualified custodian. Please see Important Disclosures.
CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT
chandlerasset.com
Chandler Team:
For questions about your account, please call (800) 317-4747,
or contact operations@chandlerasset.com
Custodian
US Bank
Christopher Isles
(503) 464-3685
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
ACCOUNT SUMMARY
Beg. Values
as of 8/31/19
End Values
as of 9/30/19
Market Value 10,828,669 10,824,799
Accrued Interest 48,291 43,695
Total Market Value 10,876,960 10,868,494
Income Earned 19,100 19,174
Cont/WD -1,007
Par 10,700,196 10,714,917
Book Value 10,688,985 10,711,749
Cost Value 10,675,108 10,694,448
TOP ISSUERS
Government of United States 26.3%
Federal Home Loan Bank 18.1%
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp 12.2%
Federal National Mortgage Assoc 11.6%
Toyota Motor Corp 3.1%
Wal-Mart Stores 1.9%
Apple Inc 1.9%
Oracle Corp 1.8%
Total 76.9%
PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS
Average Modified Duration 1.79
Average Coupon 2.06%
Average Purchase YTM 2.13%
Average Market YTM 1.81%
Average S&P/Moody Rating AA/Aa1
Average Final Maturity 1.95 yrs
Average Life 1.86 yrs
CREDIT QUALITY (S&P)MATURITY DISTRIBUTIONSECTOR ALLOCATION
Portfolio Summary
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
PERFORMANCE REVIEW
Annualized
TOTAL RATE OF RETURN 1M 3M YTD 1YR 2YRS 3YRS 5YRS 10YRS 6/30/2012
City of San Jacinto -0.07%0.74%3.33%4.52%2.44%1.82%1.57%N/A 1.27%
ICE BAML 1-3 Yr US Treasury Index -0.11%0.58%3.03%4.36%2.17%1.52%1.32%N/A 1.07%
ICE BAML 1-3 Yr US Corp/Govt Rated AAA-A Index -0.08%0.65%3.25%4.52%2.34%1.72%1.50%N/A 1.27%
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 1
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Category StandardCommentMunicipal Securities "A" rating category or better by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuerCompliesTreasury Issues No LimitationCompliesAgency Issues No LimitationCompliesSupranationals"AA" rated or better by a NRSRO; 30% maximum; 10% max per issuer; U.S. dollar denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development ("IBRD"), the International Finance Corporation ("IFC") or the Inter‐American Development Bank ("IADB") CompliesBanker’s Acceptances"A‐1" short term debt rated or higher by at least two NRSROs; and "A" long‐term debt rated or higher by at least two NRSROs; 40% maximum; 5% max per issuer; 180 days max maturity Complies Commercial Paper"A‐1" short term debt rated or higher by at least two NRSROs; and "A" long‐term debt rated or higher by at least two NRSROs; 25% maximum; 5% max per issuer; 270 days max maturity; Issuer is a corporation organized and operating in the U.S. with assets > $500 million CompliesNegotiable Certificates of Deposit"A" long‐term issuer rated category or higher by at least two NRSROs; and/or "A‐1" short term rated or higher by at least two NRSROs; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuerComplies Federally Insured Certificates of Deposit (CDs)/ Time Deposit (TDs)20% maximum (combined FDIC insured and collateralized TD/ CD); Amount per institution is limited to maximum covered under federal insuranceComplies Collateralized Certificates of Deposit (CDs)/Time Deposit (TDs)/ "A" long‐term debt rated category or higher by at least two NRSROs; and/or "A‐1" short term debt rated or higher by at least two NRSROs; 20% maximum (combined FDIC and collateralized TD/ CD)Complies Corporate Medium Term Notes"A" rated category or better by at least two NRSROs; 30% maximum; 5% max per issuer; Issued by corporations organized and operating within the U.S. or by depository institutions licensed by the U.S. or any state and operating within the U.S. Complies Mutual Fund & Money Market Mutual FundHighest rating or "AAA" rated by two NRSROs; SEC registered adviser with AUM >$500 million and experience > 5 years; 20% maximum in Mutual Funds and Money Market Mutual Funds; 10% max per one Mutual Fund; 20% max in Money Market Mutual Fund CompliesAsset‐Backed (ABS), Mortgage‐Backed Securities; Mortgage Pass‐Throughs; Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (CMOs)"AA" rated category or better by at least two NRSROs; "A" issuer debt rated category or higher by at least two NRSROs; 20% maximum; 5% max per issuerComplies Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 70% of the portfolio may be invested in LAIF, up to the maximum permitted balance; Not used by investment adviserCompliesLocal Government Investment Pools and Joint Powers Authority PoolsRiverside County Investment Fund‐ 70% max of the total portfolioJPA Pools‐ 50% max of the total portfolioRepurchase Agreements 102% collateralized; 1 year max maturityCompliesProhibited SecuritiesInverse floaters; Ranges notes, Interest‐only strips from mortgaged backed securities; Zero interest accrual securities; Margin purchasing or selling; Reverse repurchase agreements; Foreign currency denominated securities CompliesMax Callables 20% maximum callable securities (does not include "make whole call" securities)CompliesMax Per Issuer5% of portfolio per issuer (except U.S. Government, its Agencies and enterprises, Money Market Mutual Funds, Mutual Funds, LAIF, LGIP, Supranationals, or unless otherwise specified in the investment policy)CompliesMaximum maturity 5 yearsComplies City of San JacintoAs of September 30, 2019 Assets managed by Chandler Asset Management are in full compliance with state law and with the City's investment policy.Statement of Compliance3.A.3.aPacket Pg. 15Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
BOOK VALUE RECONCILIATION
BEGINNING BOOK VALUE $10,688,985.37
Acquisition
+ Security Purchases $451,658.40
+ Money Market Fund Purchases $388,749.00
+ Money Market Contributions $0.00
+ Security Contributions $0.00
+ Security Transfers $0.00
Total Acquisitions $840,407.40
Dispositions
- Security Sales $0.00
- Money Market Fund Sales $452,810.22
- MMF Withdrawals $1,006.97
- Security Withdrawals $0.00
- Security Transfers $0.00
- Other Dispositions $0.00
- Maturites $340,000.00
- Calls $0.00
- Principal Paydowns $25,211.42
Total Dispositions $819,028.61
Amortization/Accretion
+/- Net Accretion $1,384.54
$1,384.54
Gain/Loss on Dispositions
+/- Realized Gain/Loss $0.00
$0.00
ENDING BOOK VALUE $10,711,748.70
CASH TRANSACTION SUMMARY
BEGINNING BALANCE $203,932.78
Acquisition
Contributions $0.00
Security Sale Proceeds $0.00
Accrued Interest Received $0.00
Interest Received $23,092.46
Dividend Received $445.12
Principal on Maturities $340,000.00
Interest on Maturities $0.00
Calls/Redemption (Principal)$0.00
Interest from Calls/Redemption $0.00
Principal Paydown $25,211.42
Total Acquisitions $388,749.00
Dispositions
Withdrawals $1,006.97
Security Purchase $451,658.40
Accrued Interest Paid $1,151.82
Total Dispositions $453,817.19
ENDING BOOK VALUE $138,864.59
Reconciliation Summary
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto California
Account #10167
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 3
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Holdings Report
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date
Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
ABS
89238BAB8 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2018-A
A2A
2.1% Due 10/15/2020
33,057.98 01/23/2018
2.12%
33,054.60
33,056.68
100.00
2.14%
33,057.15
30.85
0.30%
0.47
Aaa / AAA
NR
1.04
0.07
65478VAD9 NAROT 2016-B A3
1.32% Due 1/15/2021
12,602.51 02/12/2018
1.87%
12,501.59
12,557.82
99.90
2.14%
12,590.05
1.85
0.12%
32.23
Aaa / NR
AAA
1.30
0.12
47788BAD6 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.82% Due 10/15/2021
65,391.66 07/26/2018
3.16%
64,418.45
64,773.55
99.84
2.16%
65,290.26
52.89
0.60%
516.71
Aaa / NR
AAA
2.04
0.46
47789JAB2 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2
2.85% Due 12/15/2021
45,000.00 03/05/2019
2.87%
44,997.95
44,998.36
100.46
2.09%
45,207.36
57.00
0.42%
209.00
Aaa / NR
AAA
2.21
0.59
43815HAC1 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2018-3
A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
70,000.00 08/21/2018
2.98%
69,990.40
69,993.03
101.16
1.99%
70,809.41
57.36
0.65%
816.38
Aaa / NR
AAA
2.90
1.18
65478WAE5 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2016-C
A4
1.38% Due 1/17/2023
130,000.00 04/16/2019
2.56%
128,080.47
128,430.24
99.50
2.13%
129,350.78
79.73
1.19%
920.54
Aaa / NR
AAA
3.30
0.67
43815NAC8 HAROT 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
80,000.00 08/20/2019
1.79%
79,999.34
79,999.36
99.79
1.88%
79,830.72
63.29
0.74%
(168.64)
Aaa / AAA
NR
3.88
2.34
477870AC3 JDOT 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
40,000.00 07/16/2019
2.23%
39,991.51
39,991.87
100.66
1.93%
40,263.32
39.29
0.37%
271.45
Aaa / NR
AAA
4.21
2.23
Total ABS 476,052.15 2.53%
473,034.31
473,800.91 2.05%
476,399.05
382.26
4.39%
2,598.14
Aaa / AAA
AAA
2.93
1.06
AGENCY
3137EADM8 FHLMC Note
1.25% Due 10/2/2019
155,000.00 09/24/2015
1.34%
154,443.55
154,999.62
100.00
1.78%
154,995.35
963.37
1.43%
(4.27)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.01
0.01
3137EAEE5 FHLMC Note
1.5% Due 1/17/2020
260,000.00 03/08/2017
1.72%
258,408.80
259,835.39
99.88
1.91%
259,682.28
801.67
2.40%
(153.11)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.30
0.30
3135G0A78 FNMA Note
1.625% Due 1/21/2020
245,000.00 12/10/2015
1.61%
245,149.45
245,011.14
99.91
1.90%
244,785.87
774.13
2.26%
(225.27)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.31
0.31
3135G0T29 FNMA Note
1.5% Due 2/28/2020
205,000.00 08/28/2017
1.48%
205,102.50
205,016.84
99.83
1.92%
204,650.68
281.88
1.89%
(366.16)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.41
0.41
3137EAEF2 FHLMC Note
1.375% Due 4/20/2020
250,000.00 07/27/2017
1.54%
248,900.00
249,777.13
99.71
1.90%
249,271.25
1,537.33
2.31%
(505.88)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.56
0.55
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 4
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Holdings Report
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date
Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
AGENCY
3137EADR7 FHLMC Note
1.375% Due 5/1/2020
225,000.00 08/24/2016
1.05%
227,637.00
225,417.61
99.71
1.88%
224,338.28
1,289.06
2.08%
(1,079.33)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.59
0.58
313383HU8 FHLB Note
1.75% Due 6/12/2020
130,000.00 10/14/2015
1.38%
132,181.40
130,326.83
99.93
1.85%
129,907.05
688.82
1.20%
(419.78)
Aaa / AA+
NR
0.70
0.69
3130A5Z77 FHLB Note
1.83% Due 7/29/2020
125,000.00 10/27/2015
1.46%
127,132.50
125,370.98
99.98
1.85%
124,976.63
393.96
1.15%
(394.35)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.83
0.82
3137EAEK1 FHLMC Note
1.875% Due 11/17/2020
225,000.00 01/18/2018
2.19%
223,042.50
224,217.38
100.10
1.78%
225,232.20
1,570.31
2.09%
1,014.82
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.13
1.11
3130A3UQ5 FHLB Note
1.875% Due 12/11/2020
225,000.00 01/28/2016
1.53%
228,642.75
225,895.32
100.04
1.84%
225,094.28
1,289.06
2.08%
(801.04)
Aaa / AA+
NR
1.20
1.17
3130A7CV5 FHLB Note
1.375% Due 2/18/2021
200,000.00 03/10/2016
1.61%
197,812.00
199,386.63
99.48
1.76%
198,953.80
328.47
1.83%
(432.83)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.39
1.36
3135G0N82 FNMA Note
1.25% Due 8/17/2021
315,000.00 01/26/2017
2.02%
304,579.80
310,691.23
99.25
1.66%
312,641.60
481.25
2.88%
1,950.37
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.88
1.85
313378WG2 FHLB Note
2.5% Due 3/11/2022
300,000.00 03/13/2018
2.65%
298,323.00
298,974.02
102.06
1.64%
306,180.60
416.67
2.82%
7,206.58
Aaa / AA+
NR
2.45
2.37
313379Q69 FHLB Note
2.125% Due 6/10/2022
200,000.00 06/20/2017
1.87%
202,370.00
201,283.59
101.27
1.64%
202,533.40
1,310.42
1.88%
1,249.81
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.70
2.60
3135G0W33 FNMA Note
1.375% Due 9/6/2022
200,000.00 09/05/2019
1.49%
199,304.00
199,319.88
99.29
1.62%
198,581.20
190.97
1.83%
(738.68)
NR / AA+
AAA
2.94
2.86
3130A3KM5 FHLB Note
2.5% Due 12/9/2022
100,000.00 09/10/2019
1.60%
102,813.00
102,770.20
102.52
1.68%
102,524.50
777.78
0.95%
(245.70)
Aaa / AA+
NR
3.19
3.04
3135G0T94 FNMA Note
2.375% Due 1/19/2023
290,000.00 10/17/2018
3.07%
281,993.10
283,782.15
102.49
1.60%
297,207.66
1,377.50
2.75%
13,425.51
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.31
3.16
3137EAEN5 FHLMC Note
2.75% Due 6/19/2023
200,000.00 11/13/2018
3.08%
197,176.00
197,716.23
104.04
1.63%
208,085.60
1,558.33
1.93%
10,369.37
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.72
3.51
313383YJ4 FHLB Note
3.375% Due 9/8/2023
200,000.00 12/27/2018
2.73%
205,630.00
204,720.66
106.59
1.64%
213,173.20
431.25
1.97%
8,452.54
Aaa / AA+
NR
3.94
3.69
3130A0F70 FHLB Note
3.375% Due 12/8/2023
220,000.00 01/30/2019
2.71%
226,593.40
225,689.23
106.99
1.64%
235,383.06
2,330.63
2.19%
9,693.83
Aaa / AA+
AAA
4.19
3.88
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 5
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Holdings Report
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date
Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
AGENCY
3130A1XJ2 FHLB Note
2.875% Due 6/14/2024
210,000.00 Various
1.96%
219,055.20
218,533.65
105.58
1.64%
221,722.20
1,794.48
2.06%
3,188.55
Aaa / AA+
NR
4.71
4.37
Total Agency 4,480,000.00 1.97%
4,486,289.95
4,488,735.71 1.74%
4,539,920.69
20,587.34
41.96%
51,184.98
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.97
1.88
COMMERCIAL PAPER
62479MXN8 MUFG Bank Ltd/NY Discount CP
2.27% Due 10/22/2019
200,000.00 06/20/2019
2.32%
198,436.22
199,735.17
99.87
2.32%
199,735.17
0.00
1.84%
0.00
P-1 / A-1
NR
0.06
0.06
89233GA71 Toyota Motor Credit Discount CP
2.14% Due 1/7/2020
200,000.00 07/22/2019
2.19%
197,990.78
198,834.89
99.42
2.19%
198,834.89
0.00
1.83%
0.00
P-1 / A-1+
NR
0.27
0.27
Total Commercial Paper 400,000.00 2.26%
396,427.00
398,570.06 2.26%
398,570.06
0.00
3.67%
0.00
P-1 / A-1
NR
0.17
0.16
MONEY MARKET FUND FI
31846V203 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
138,864.59 Various
1.57%
138,864.59
138,864.59
1.00
1.57%
138,864.59
0.00
1.28%
0.00
Aaa / AAA
AAA
0.00
0.00
Total Money Market Fund FI 138,864.59 1.57%
138,864.59
138,864.59 1.57%
138,864.59
0.00
1.28%
0.00
Aaa / AAA
AAA
0.00
0.00
US CORPORATE
166764AN0 Chevron Corp Callable Note Cont
10/15/2019
2.193% Due 11/15/2019
130,000.00 01/05/2016
2.12%
130,341.90
130,003.48
100.01
2.04%
130,007.80
1,077.01
1.21%
4.32
Aa2 / AA
NR
0.13
0.04
46625HKA7 JP Morgan Chase Callable Note Cont
12/23/2019
2.25% Due 1/23/2020
125,000.00 08/11/2017
1.91%
125,970.00
125,093.73
100.03
2.13%
125,033.00
531.25
1.16%
(60.73)
A2 / A-
AA-
0.32
0.23
857477AS2 State Street Bank Note
2.55% Due 8/18/2020
125,000.00 11/29/2016
2.18%
126,620.00
125,384.97
100.47
2.01%
125,590.50
380.73
1.16%
205.53
A1 / A
AA-
0.88
0.87
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 6
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Holdings Report
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date
Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
US CORPORATE
02665WAZ4 American Honda Finance Note
2.45% Due 9/24/2020
150,000.00 10/07/2016
1.72%
154,161.00
151,035.92
100.49
1.94%
150,739.50
71.46
1.39%
(296.42)
A2 / A
NR
0.99
0.97
91159HHL7 US Bancorp Callable Note 1X
12/29/2020
2.35% Due 1/29/2021
125,000.00 05/02/2017
2.12%
126,012.50
125,345.34
100.48
1.96%
125,601.25
505.90
1.16%
255.91
A1 / A+
AA-
1.33
1.22
17275RBD3 Cisco Systems Note
2.2% Due 2/28/2021
150,000.00 09/20/2017
1.98%
151,108.50
150,455.77
100.52
1.83%
150,776.55
302.50
1.39%
320.78
A1 / AA-
NR
1.42
1.38
369550BE7 General Dynamics Corp Note
3% Due 5/11/2021
125,000.00 05/15/2018
3.25%
124,128.75
124,529.57
101.75
1.89%
127,188.88
1,458.33
1.18%
2,659.31
A2 / A+
NR
1.61
1.56
808513AW5 Charles Schwab Corp Callable Note
Cont 4/21/2021
3.25% Due 5/21/2021
150,000.00 05/30/2018
3.01%
151,011.00
150,544.31
102.06
1.90%
153,093.75
1,760.42
1.42%
2,549.44
A2 / A
A
1.64
1.50
931142EJ8 Wal-Mart Stores Note
3.125% Due 6/23/2021
200,000.00 Various
2.96%
200,929.00
200,542.70
102.26
1.79%
204,514.20
1,701.39
1.90%
3,971.50
Aa2 / AA
AA
1.73
1.67
68389XBK0 Oracle Corp Callable Note Cont
8/15/2021
1.9% Due 9/15/2021
200,000.00 10/12/2017
2.11%
198,458.00
199,229.00
99.88
1.96%
199,764.20
168.89
1.84%
535.20
A1 / A+
A
1.96
1.91
89236TDP7 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Note
2.6% Due 1/11/2022
130,000.00 01/28/2019
2.98%
128,629.80
128,940.23
101.58
1.89%
132,057.25
751.11
1.22%
3,117.02
Aa3 / AA-
A+
2.28
2.20
06051GEU9 Bank of America Corp Note
3.3% Due 1/11/2023
130,000.00 01/28/2019
3.29%
130,059.80
130,049.68
103.32
2.24%
134,311.84
953.33
1.24%
4,262.16
A2 / A-
A+
3.28
3.08
06406RAE7 Bank of NY Mellon Corp Callable Note
Cont 12/29/2022
2.95% Due 1/29/2023
145,000.00 09/09/2019
1.97%
149,541.40
149,466.02
102.70
2.09%
148,908.62
736.68
1.38%
(557.40)
A1 / A
AA-
3.33
3.08
084670BR8 Berkshire Hathaway Callable Note Cont
1/15/2023
2.75% Due 3/15/2023
150,000.00 08/26/2019
1.83%
154,525.50
154,401.01
102.51
1.96%
153,769.50
183.33
1.42%
(631.51)
Aa2 / AA
A+
3.46
3.14
037833AK6 Apple Inc Note
2.4% Due 5/3/2023
200,000.00 05/20/2019
2.63%
198,284.00
198,441.08
101.65
1.92%
203,293.80
1,973.33
1.89%
4,852.72
Aa1 / AA+
NR
3.59
3.40
24422EUR8 John Deere Capital Corp Note
3.45% Due 1/10/2024
150,000.00 03/14/2019
2.95%
153,322.50
152,950.40
105.36
2.13%
158,035.65
1,164.38
1.46%
5,085.25
A2 / A
A
4.28
3.95
Total US Corporate 2,385,000.00 2.44%
2,403,103.65
2,396,413.21 1.97%
2,422,686.29
13,720.04
22.42%
26,273.08
A1 / A+
A+
2.10
1.97
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 7
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Holdings Report
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date
Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
US TREASURY
912828UB4 US Treasury Note
1% Due 11/30/2019
125,000.00 10/26/2016
1.05%
124,819.76
124,990.39
99.83
2.03%
124,784.13
420.08
1.15%
(206.26)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.17
0.17
912828UV0 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 3/31/2020
195,000.00 11/17/2015
1.61%
191,054.95
194,549.84
99.63
1.87%
194,283.96
5.99
1.79%
(265.88)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.50
0.50
912828L32 US Treasury Note
1.375% Due 8/31/2020
200,000.00 11/03/2015
1.56%
198,289.73
199,674.84
99.57
1.85%
199,140.60
234.20
1.83%
(534.24)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
0.92
0.91
912828M98 US Treasury Note
1.625% Due 11/30/2020
205,000.00 Various
1.71%
204,350.30
204,807.08
99.80
1.80%
204,583.65
1,119.52
1.89%
(223.43)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.17
1.14
912828N89 US Treasury Note
1.375% Due 1/31/2021
160,000.00 04/04/2018
2.41%
155,500.00
157,872.09
99.48
1.77%
159,162.56
370.65
1.47%
1,290.47
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.34
1.31
912828Q78 US Treasury Note
1.375% Due 4/30/2021
210,000.00 05/25/2017
1.66%
207,753.05
209,093.36
99.45
1.73%
208,843.32
1,208.36
1.93%
(250.04)
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.58
1.55
912828WN6 US Treasury Note
2% Due 5/31/2021
200,000.00 04/29/2019
2.29%
198,820.31
199,058.73
100.46
1.72%
200,929.60
1,344.26
1.86%
1,870.87
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.67
1.62
912828S76 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 7/31/2021
260,000.00 11/29/2017
1.98%
252,169.53
256,087.69
99.00
1.68%
257,410.14
492.80
2.37%
1,322.45
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.84
1.80
912828T34 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 9/30/2021
125,000.00 05/30/2018
2.59%
119,194.34
121,520.42
98.98
1.65%
123,720.75
3.84
1.14%
2,200.33
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.00
1.97
912828G53 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 11/30/2021
220,000.00 04/26/2017
1.81%
220,653.86
220,308.23
100.53
1.63%
221,160.06
1,386.27
2.05%
851.83
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.17
2.10
912828W89 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 3/31/2022
200,000.00 04/26/2018
2.75%
193,531.25
195,885.98
100.68
1.60%
201,359.40
10.25
1.85%
5,473.42
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.50
2.43
912828L24 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 8/31/2022
150,000.00 07/22/2019
1.77%
150,462.89
150,434.34
100.84
1.58%
151,259.70
239.53
1.39%
825.36
Aaa / AA+
AAA
2.92
2.83
912828M80 US Treasury Note
2% Due 11/30/2022
200,000.00 04/11/2019
2.31%
197,851.56
198,125.59
101.26
1.59%
202,515.60
1,344.26
1.88%
4,390.01
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.17
3.04
9128284D9 US Treasury Note
2.5% Due 3/31/2023
210,000.00 Various
2.95%
206,053.12
206,934.24
103.14
1.57%
216,603.45
14.35
1.99%
9,669.21
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.50
3.35
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 8
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Holdings Report
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description Par Value/Units Purchase Date
Book Yield
Cost Value
Book Value
Mkt Price
Mkt YTM
Market Value
Accrued Int.
% of Port.
Gain/Loss
Moody/S&P
Fitch
Maturity
Duration
US TREASURY
912828Y61 US Treasury Note
2.75% Due 7/31/2023
175,000.00 12/27/2018
2.59%
176,223.63
176,021.40
104.34
1.58%
182,601.65
810.80
1.69%
6,580.25
Aaa / AA+
AAA
3.84
3.63
Total US Treasury 2,835,000.00 2.07%
2,796,728.28
2,815,364.22 1.70%
2,848,358.57
9,005.16
26.29%
32,994.35
Aaa / AA+
AAA
1.99
1.93
TOTAL PORTFOLIO 10,714,916.74 2.13%
10,694,447.78
10,711,748.70 1.81%
10,824,799.25
43,694.80
100.00%
113,050.55
Aa1 / AA
AAA
1.95
1.79
TOTAL MARKET VALUE PLUS ACCRUED 10,868,494.05
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 9
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Transaction Ledger
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp
Yield Amount Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 09/03/2019 31846V203 445.12 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%445.12 0.00 445.12 0.00
Purchase 09/06/2019 3135G0W33 200,000.00 FNMA Note
1.375% Due 9/6/2022
99.652 1.49%199,304.00 0.00 199,304.00 0.00
Purchase 09/08/2019 31846V203 3,375.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%3,375.00 0.00 3,375.00 0.00
Purchase 09/11/2019 06406RAE7 145,000.00 Bank of NY Mellon Corp Callable Note
Cont 12/29/2022
2.95% Due 1/29/2023
103.132 1.97%149,541.40 499.04 150,040.44 0.00
Purchase 09/11/2019 31846V203 5,475.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%5,475.00 0.00 5,475.00 0.00
Purchase 09/11/2019 31846V203 150,000.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%150,000.00 0.00 150,000.00 0.00
Purchase 09/13/2019 3130A3KM5 100,000.00 FHLB Note
2.5% Due 12/9/2022
102.813 1.60%102,813.00 652.78 103,465.78 0.00
Purchase 09/13/2019 31846V203 1,306.25 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%1,306.25 0.00 1,306.25 0.00
Purchase 09/13/2019 31846V203 190,000.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%190,000.00 0.00 190,000.00 0.00
Purchase 09/15/2019 31846V203 3,962.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%3,962.50 0.00 3,962.50 0.00
Purchase 09/16/2019 31846V203 125.23 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%125.23 0.00 125.23 0.00
Purchase 09/16/2019 31846V203 106.88 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%106.88 0.00 106.88 0.00
Purchase 09/16/2019 31846V203 149.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%149.50 0.00 149.50 0.00
Purchase 09/16/2019 31846V203 71.20 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%71.20 0.00 71.20 0.00
Purchase 09/16/2019 31846V203 5,032.63 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%5,032.63 0.00 5,032.63 0.00
Purchase 09/16/2019 31846V203 3,943.82 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%3,943.82 0.00 3,943.82 0.00
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 10
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Transaction Ledger
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp
Yield Amount Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
ACQUISITIONS
Purchase 09/16/2019 31846V203 16,446.28 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%16,446.28 0.00 16,446.28 0.00
Purchase 09/23/2019 31846V203 172.08 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%172.08 0.00 172.08 0.00
Purchase 09/24/2019 31846V203 1,837.50 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%1,837.50 0.00 1,837.50 0.00
Purchase 09/30/2019 31846V203 6,300.01 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.57%6,300.01 0.00 6,300.01 0.00
Subtotal 833,749.00 840,407.40 1,151.82 841,559.22 0.00
Short Sale 09/11/2019 31846V203 -150,040.44 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 -150,040.44 0.00 -150,040.44 0.00
Short Sale 09/13/2019 31846V203 -103,465.78 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 -103,465.78 0.00 -103,465.78 0.00
Subtotal -253,506.22 -253,506.22 0.00 -253,506.22 0.00
TOTAL ACQUISITIONS 580,242.78 586,901.18 1,151.82 588,053.00 0.00
DISPOSITIONS
Closing
Purchase
09/11/2019 31846V203 -150,040.44 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 -150,040.44 0.00 -150,040.44 0.00
Closing
Purchase
09/13/2019 31846V203 -103,465.78 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 -103,465.78 0.00 -103,465.78 0.00
Subtotal -253,506.22 -253,506.22 0.00 -253,506.22 0.00
Sale 09/06/2019 31846V203 199,304.00 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%199,304.00 0.00 199,304.00 0.00
Sale 09/11/2019 31846V203 150,040.44 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%150,040.44 0.00 150,040.44 0.00
Sale 09/13/2019 31846V203 103,465.78 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 1.71%103,465.78 0.00 103,465.78 0.00
Subtotal 452,810.22 452,810.22 0.00 452,810.22 0.00
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 11
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Transaction Ledger
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp
Yield Amount Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
DISPOSITIONS
Paydown 09/16/2019 43815NAC8 0.00 HAROT 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
100.000 0.00 71.20 71.20 0.00
Paydown 09/16/2019 477870AC3 0.00 JDOT 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
100.000 0.00 125.23 125.23 0.00
Paydown 09/16/2019 47788BAD6 4,925.98 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.82% Due 10/15/2021
100.000 4,925.98 106.65 5,032.63 0.00
Paydown 09/16/2019 47789JAB2 0.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2
2.85% Due 12/15/2021
100.000 0.00 106.88 106.88 0.00
Paydown 09/16/2019 65478VAD9 3,925.64 NAROT 2016-B A3
1.32% Due 1/15/2021
100.000 3,925.64 18.18 3,943.82 0.00
Paydown 09/16/2019 65478WAE5 0.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2016-C
A4
1.38% Due 1/17/2023
100.000 0.00 149.50 149.50 0.00
Paydown 09/16/2019 89238BAB8 16,359.80 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2018-A
A2A
2.1% Due 10/15/2020
100.000 16,359.80 86.48 16,446.28 0.00
Paydown 09/23/2019 43815HAC1 0.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2018-3
A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
100.000 0.00 172.08 172.08 0.00
Subtotal 25,211.42 25,211.42 836.20 26,047.62 0.00
Maturity 09/11/2019 06406HCW7 150,000.00 Bank of New York Callable Note Cont
8/11/2019
2.3% Due 9/11/2019
100.000 150,000.00 0.00 150,000.00 0.00
Maturity 09/13/2019 313380FB8 190,000.00 FHLB Note
1.375% Due 9/13/2019
100.000 190,000.00 0.00 190,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 340,000.00 340,000.00 0.00 340,000.00 0.00
Security
Withdrawal
09/05/2019 31846V203 902.80 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 902.80 0.00 902.80 0.00
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 12
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Transaction Ledger
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp
Yield Amount Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
DISPOSITIONS
Security
Withdrawal
09/25/2019 31846V203 104.17 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
1.000 104.17 0.00 104.17 0.00
Subtotal 1,006.97 1,006.97 0.00 1,006.97 0.00
TOTAL DISPOSITIONS 565,522.39 565,522.39 836.20 566,358.59 0.00
OTHER TRANSACTIONS
Interest 09/08/2019 313383YJ4 200,000.00 FHLB Note
3.375% Due 9/8/2023
0.000 3,375.00 0.00 3,375.00 0.00
Interest 09/11/2019 06406HCW7 150,000.00 Bank of New York Callable Note Cont
8/11/2019
2.3% Due 9/11/2019
0.000 1,725.00 0.00 1,725.00 0.00
Interest 09/11/2019 313378WG2 300,000.00 FHLB Note
2.5% Due 3/11/2022
0.000 3,750.00 0.00 3,750.00 0.00
Interest 09/13/2019 313380FB8 190,000.00 FHLB Note
1.375% Due 9/13/2019
0.000 1,306.25 0.00 1,306.25 0.00
Interest 09/15/2019 084670BR8 150,000.00 Berkshire Hathaway Callable Note Cont
1/15/2023
2.75% Due 3/15/2023
0.000 2,062.50 0.00 2,062.50 0.00
Interest 09/15/2019 68389XBK0 200,000.00 Oracle Corp Callable Note Cont
8/15/2021
1.9% Due 9/15/2021
0.000 1,900.00 0.00 1,900.00 0.00
Interest 09/24/2019 02665WAZ4 150,000.00 American Honda Finance Note
2.45% Due 9/24/2020
0.000 1,837.50 0.00 1,837.50 0.00
Interest 09/30/2019 9128284D9 210,000.00 US Treasury Note
2.5% Due 3/31/2023
0.000 2,625.00 0.00 2,625.00 0.00
Interest 09/30/2019 912828T34 125,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 9/30/2021
0.000 703.13 0.00 703.13 0.00
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 13
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Transaction Ledger
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Transaction
Type
Settlement
Date CUSIP Quantity Security Description Price Acq/Disp
Yield Amount Interest
Pur/Sold Total Amount Gain/Loss
OTHER TRANSACTIONS
Interest 09/30/2019 912828UV0 195,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 3/31/2020
0.000 1,096.88 0.00 1,096.88 0.00
Interest 09/30/2019 912828W89 200,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 3/31/2022
0.000 1,875.00 0.00 1,875.00 0.00
Subtotal 2,070,000.00 22,256.26 0.00 22,256.26 0.00
Dividend 09/03/2019 31846V203 203,932.78 First American Govt Obligation Fund
Class Y
0.000 445.12 0.00 445.12 0.00
Subtotal 203,932.78 445.12 0.00 445.12 0.00
TOTAL OTHER TRANSACTIONS 2,273,932.78 22,701.38 0.00 22,701.38 0.00
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 14
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Income Earned
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description
Trade Date
Settle Date
Units
Book Value: Begin
Book Value: Acq
Book Value: Disp
Book Value: End
Prior Accrued
Inc. Received
Ending Accrued
Total Interest
Accr. Of Discount
Amort. Of Premium
Net Accret/Amort
Income Earned
Total Income
FIXED INCOME
02665WAZ4 American Honda Finance
Note
2.45% Due 09/24/2020
10/07/2016
10/13/2016
150,000.00
151,122.49
0.00
0.00
151,035.92
1,602.71
1,837.50
71.46
306.25
0.00
86.57
(86.57)
219.68
219.68
037833AK6 Apple Inc
Note
2.4% Due 05/03/2023
05/20/2019
05/22/2019
200,000.00
198,405.38
0.00
0.00
198,441.08
1,573.33
0.00
1,973.33
400.00
35.70
0.00
35.70
435.70
435.70
06051GEU9 Bank of America Corp
Note
3.3% Due 01/11/2023
01/28/2019
01/30/2019
130,000.00
130,050.93
0.00
0.00
130,049.68
595.83
0.00
953.33
357.50
0.00
1.25
(1.25)
356.25
356.25
06406HCW7 Bank of New York
Callable Note Cont 8/11/2019
Due 09/11/2019
10/26/2016
10/31/2016
0.00
150,000.00
0.00
150,000.00
0.00
1,629.17
1,725.00
0.00
95.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
95.83
95.83
06406RAE7 Bank of NY Mellon Corp
Callable Note Cont 12/29/2022
2.95% Due 01/29/2023
09/09/2019
09/11/2019
145,000.00
0.00
149,541.40
0.00
149,466.02
0.00
(499.04)
736.68
237.64
0.00
75.38
(75.38)
162.26
162.26
084670BR8 Berkshire Hathaway
Callable Note Cont 1/15/2023
2.75% Due 03/15/2023
08/26/2019
08/28/2019
150,000.00
154,510.85
0.00
0.00
154,401.01
1,902.08
2,062.50
183.33
343.75
0.00
109.84
(109.84)
233.91
233.91
166764AN0 Chevron Corp
Callable Note Cont 10/15/2019
2.193% Due 11/15/2019
01/05/2016
01/08/2016
130,000.00
130,010.93
0.00
0.00
130,003.48
839.43
0.00
1,077.01
237.58
0.00
7.45
(7.45)
230.13
230.13
17275RBD3 Cisco Systems
Note
2.2% Due 02/28/2021
09/20/2017
09/22/2017
150,000.00
150,482.26
0.00
0.00
150,455.77
27.50
0.00
302.50
275.00
0.00
26.49
(26.49)
248.51
248.51
24422EUR8 John Deere Capital Corp
Note
3.45% Due 01/10/2024
03/14/2019
03/18/2019
150,000.00
153,007.06
0.00
0.00
152,950.40
733.13
0.00
1,164.38
431.25
0.00
56.66
(56.66)
374.59
374.59
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 15
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Income Earned
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description
Trade Date
Settle Date
Units
Book Value: Begin
Book Value: Acq
Book Value: Disp
Book Value: End
Prior Accrued
Inc. Received
Ending Accrued
Total Interest
Accr. Of Discount
Amort. Of Premium
Net Accret/Amort
Income Earned
Total Income
3130A0F70 FHLB
Note
3.375% Due 12/08/2023
01/30/2019
01/31/2019
220,000.00
225,800.85
0.00
0.00
225,689.23
1,711.88
0.00
2,330.63
618.75
0.00
111.62
(111.62)
507.13
507.13
3130A1XJ2 FHLB
Note
2.875% Due 06/14/2024
Various
Various
210,000.00
218,682.67
0.00
0.00
218,533.65
1,291.36
0.00
1,794.48
503.12
0.00
149.02
(149.02)
354.10
354.10
3130A3KM5 FHLB
Note
2.5% Due 12/09/2022
09/10/2019
09/13/2019
100,000.00
0.00
102,813.00
0.00
102,770.20
0.00
(652.78)
777.78
125.00
0.00
42.80
(42.80)
82.20
82.20
3130A3UQ5 FHLB
Note
1.875% Due 12/11/2020
01/28/2016
01/29/2016
225,000.00
225,956.79
0.00
0.00
225,895.32
937.50
0.00
1,289.06
351.56
0.00
61.47
(61.47)
290.09
290.09
3130A5Z77 FHLB
Note
1.83% Due 07/29/2020
10/27/2015
10/28/2015
125,000.00
125,407.83
0.00
0.00
125,370.98
203.33
0.00
393.96
190.63
0.00
36.85
(36.85)
153.78
153.78
3130A7CV5 FHLB
Note
1.375% Due 02/18/2021
03/10/2016
03/11/2016
200,000.00
199,350.27
0.00
0.00
199,386.63
99.31
0.00
328.47
229.16
36.36
0.00
36.36
265.52
265.52
313378WG2 FHLB
Note
2.5% Due 03/11/2022
03/13/2018
03/14/2018
300,000.00
298,939.51
0.00
0.00
298,974.02
3,541.67
3,750.00
416.67
625.00
34.51
0.00
34.51
659.51
659.51
313379Q69 FHLB
Note
2.125% Due 06/10/2022
06/20/2017
06/21/2017
200,000.00
201,322.76
0.00
0.00
201,283.59
956.25
0.00
1,310.42
354.17
0.00
39.17
(39.17)
315.00
315.00
313380FB8 FHLB
Note
Due 09/13/2019
10/25/2017
10/26/2017
0.00
189,984.47
0.00
190,000.00
0.00
1,219.17
1,306.25
0.00
87.08
15.53
0.00
15.53
102.61
102.61
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 16
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Income Earned
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description
Trade Date
Settle Date
Units
Book Value: Begin
Book Value: Acq
Book Value: Disp
Book Value: End
Prior Accrued
Inc. Received
Ending Accrued
Total Interest
Accr. Of Discount
Amort. Of Premium
Net Accret/Amort
Income Earned
Total Income
313383HU8 FHLB
Note
1.75% Due 06/12/2020
10/14/2015
10/15/2015
130,000.00
130,365.28
0.00
0.00
130,326.83
499.24
0.00
688.82
189.58
0.00
38.45
(38.45)
151.13
151.13
313383YJ4 FHLB
Note
3.375% Due 09/08/2023
12/27/2018
12/28/2018
200,000.00
204,819.15
0.00
0.00
204,720.66
3,243.75
3,375.00
431.25
562.50
0.00
98.49
(98.49)
464.01
464.01
3135G0A78 FNMA
Note
1.625% Due 01/21/2020
12/10/2015
12/11/2015
245,000.00
245,014.13
0.00
0.00
245,011.14
442.36
0.00
774.13
331.77
0.00
2.99
(2.99)
328.78
328.78
3135G0N82 FNMA
Note
1.25% Due 08/17/2021
01/26/2017
01/31/2017
315,000.00
310,502.79
0.00
0.00
310,691.23
153.13
0.00
481.25
328.12
188.44
0.00
188.44
516.56
516.56
3135G0T29 FNMA
Note
1.5% Due 02/28/2020
08/28/2017
08/29/2017
205,000.00
205,020.21
0.00
0.00
205,016.84
25.63
0.00
281.88
256.25
0.00
3.37
(3.37)
252.88
252.88
3135G0T94 FNMA
Note
2.375% Due 01/19/2023
10/17/2018
10/19/2018
290,000.00
283,627.48
0.00
0.00
283,782.15
803.54
0.00
1,377.50
573.96
154.67
0.00
154.67
728.63
728.63
3135G0W33 FNMA
Note
1.375% Due 09/06/2022
09/05/2019
09/06/2019
200,000.00
0.00
199,304.00
0.00
199,319.88
0.00
0.00
190.97
190.97
15.88
0.00
15.88
206.85
206.85
3137EADM8 FHLMC
Note
1.25% Due 10/02/2019
09/24/2015
09/25/2015
155,000.00
154,988.25
0.00
0.00
154,999.62
801.91
0.00
963.37
161.46
11.37
0.00
11.37
172.83
172.83
3137EADR7 FHLMC
Note
1.375% Due 05/01/2020
08/24/2016
08/25/2016
225,000.00
225,476.42
0.00
0.00
225,417.61
1,031.25
0.00
1,289.06
257.81
0.00
58.81
(58.81)
199.00
199.00
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 17
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Income Earned
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description
Trade Date
Settle Date
Units
Book Value: Begin
Book Value: Acq
Book Value: Disp
Book Value: End
Prior Accrued
Inc. Received
Ending Accrued
Total Interest
Accr. Of Discount
Amort. Of Premium
Net Accret/Amort
Income Earned
Total Income
3137EAEE5 FHLMC
Note
1.5% Due 01/17/2020
03/08/2017
03/09/2017
260,000.00
259,789.67
0.00
0.00
259,835.39
476.67
0.00
801.67
325.00
45.72
0.00
45.72
370.72
370.72
3137EAEF2 FHLMC
Note
1.375% Due 04/20/2020
07/27/2017
07/28/2017
250,000.00
249,744.03
0.00
0.00
249,777.13
1,250.87
0.00
1,537.33
286.46
33.10
0.00
33.10
319.56
319.56
3137EAEK1 FHLMC
Note
1.875% Due 11/17/2020
01/18/2018
01/19/2018
225,000.00
224,160.53
0.00
0.00
224,217.38
1,218.75
0.00
1,570.31
351.56
56.85
0.00
56.85
408.41
408.41
3137EAEN5 FHLMC
Note
2.75% Due 06/19/2023
11/13/2018
11/14/2018
200,000.00
197,665.74
0.00
0.00
197,716.23
1,100.00
0.00
1,558.33
458.33
50.49
0.00
50.49
508.82
508.82
369550BE7 General Dynamics Corp
Note
3% Due 05/11/2021
05/15/2018
05/18/2018
125,000.00
124,505.57
0.00
0.00
124,529.57
1,145.83
0.00
1,458.33
312.50
24.00
0.00
24.00
336.50
336.50
43815HAC1 Honda Auto Receivables Owner
2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 08/22/2022
08/21/2018
08/28/2018
70,000.00
69,992.83
0.00
0.00
69,993.03
57.36
172.08
57.36
172.08
0.20
0.00
0.20
172.28
172.28
43815NAC8 HAROT
2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 08/15/2023
08/20/2019
08/27/2019
80,000.00
79,999.34
0.00
0.00
79,999.36
15.82
71.20
63.29
118.67
0.02
0.00
0.02
118.69
118.69
46625HKA7 JP Morgan Chase
Callable Note Cont 12/23/2019
2.25% Due 01/23/2020
08/11/2017
08/16/2017
125,000.00
125,127.60
0.00
0.00
125,093.73
296.88
0.00
531.25
234.37
0.00
33.87
(33.87)
200.50
200.50
477870AC3 JDOT
2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
07/16/2019
07/24/2019
40,000.00
39,991.72
0.00
0.00
39,991.87
90.86
125.23
39.29
73.66
0.15
0.00
0.15
73.81
73.81
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 18
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Income Earned
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description
Trade Date
Settle Date
Units
Book Value: Begin
Book Value: Acq
Book Value: Disp
Book Value: End
Prior Accrued
Inc. Received
Ending Accrued
Total Interest
Accr. Of Discount
Amort. Of Premium
Net Accret/Amort
Income Earned
Total Income
47788BAD6 John Deere Owner Trust
2017-B A3
1.82% Due 10/15/2021
07/26/2018
07/30/2018
65,391.66
69,626.21
0.00
4,925.98
64,773.55
56.88
106.65
52.89
102.66
73.32
0.00
73.32
175.98
175.98
47789JAB2 John Deere Owner Trust
2019-A A2
2.85% Due 12/15/2021
03/05/2019
03/13/2019
45,000.00
44,998.30
0.00
0.00
44,998.36
57.00
106.88
57.00
106.88
0.06
0.00
0.06
106.94
106.94
65478VAD9 NAROT
2016-B A3
1.32% Due 01/15/2021
02/12/2018
02/14/2018
12,602.51
16,465.82
0.00
3,925.64
12,557.82
2.42
18.18
1.85
17.61
17.64
0.00
17.64
35.25
35.25
65478WAE5 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner
2016-C A4
1.38% Due 01/17/2023
04/16/2019
04/18/2019
130,000.00
128,367.03
0.00
0.00
128,430.24
79.73
149.50
79.73
149.50
63.21
0.00
63.21
212.71
212.71
68389XBK0 Oracle Corp
Callable Note Cont 8/15/2021
1.9% Due 09/15/2021
10/12/2017
10/16/2017
200,000.00
199,196.65
0.00
0.00
199,229.00
1,752.22
1,900.00
168.89
316.67
32.35
0.00
32.35
349.02
349.02
808513AW5 Charles Schwab Corp
Callable Note Cont 4/21/2021
3.25% Due 05/21/2021
05/30/2018
06/01/2018
150,000.00
150,573.06
0.00
0.00
150,544.31
1,354.17
0.00
1,760.42
406.25
0.00
28.75
(28.75)
377.50
377.50
857477AS2 State Street Bank
Note
2.55% Due 08/18/2020
11/29/2016
12/02/2016
125,000.00
125,420.84
0.00
0.00
125,384.97
115.10
0.00
380.73
265.63
0.00
35.87
(35.87)
229.76
229.76
89236TDP7 Toyota Motor Credit Corp
Note
2.6% Due 01/11/2022
01/28/2019
01/30/2019
130,000.00
128,902.06
0.00
0.00
128,940.23
469.44
0.00
751.11
281.67
38.17
0.00
38.17
319.84
319.84
89238BAB8 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner
2018-A A2A
2.1% Due 10/15/2020
01/23/2018
01/31/2018
33,057.98
49,415.68
0.00
16,359.80
33,056.68
46.12
86.48
30.85
71.21
0.80
0.00
0.80
72.01
72.01
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 19
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Income Earned
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description
Trade Date
Settle Date
Units
Book Value: Begin
Book Value: Acq
Book Value: Disp
Book Value: End
Prior Accrued
Inc. Received
Ending Accrued
Total Interest
Accr. Of Discount
Amort. Of Premium
Net Accret/Amort
Income Earned
Total Income
91159HHL7 US Bancorp
Callable Note 1X 12/29/2020
2.35% Due 01/29/2021
05/02/2017
05/05/2017
125,000.00
125,368.11
0.00
0.00
125,345.34
261.11
0.00
505.90
244.79
0.00
22.77
(22.77)
222.02
222.02
9128284D9 US Treasury
Note
2.5% Due 03/31/2023
Various
Various
210,000.00
206,862.22
0.00
0.00
206,934.24
2,209.02
2,625.00
14.35
430.33
72.02
0.00
72.02
502.35
502.35
912828G53 US Treasury
Note
1.875% Due 11/30/2021
04/26/2017
04/27/2017
220,000.00
220,319.92
0.00
0.00
220,308.23
1,048.16
0.00
1,386.27
338.11
0.00
11.69
(11.69)
326.42
326.42
912828L24 US Treasury
Note
1.875% Due 08/31/2022
07/22/2019
07/23/2019
150,000.00
150,446.58
0.00
0.00
150,434.34
7.73
0.00
239.53
231.80
0.00
12.24
(12.24)
219.56
219.56
912828L32 US Treasury
Note
1.375% Due 08/31/2020
11/03/2015
11/04/2015
200,000.00
199,645.72
0.00
0.00
199,674.84
7.55
0.00
234.20
226.65
29.12
0.00
29.12
255.77
255.77
912828M80 US Treasury
Note
2% Due 11/30/2022
04/11/2019
04/15/2019
200,000.00
198,076.94
0.00
0.00
198,125.59
1,016.39
0.00
1,344.26
327.87
48.65
0.00
48.65
376.52
376.52
912828M98 US Treasury
Note
1.625% Due 11/30/2020
Various
Various
205,000.00
204,793.50
0.00
0.00
204,807.08
846.46
0.00
1,119.52
273.06
13.58
0.00
13.58
286.64
286.64
912828N89 US Treasury
Note
1.375% Due 01/31/2021
04/04/2018
04/05/2018
160,000.00
157,741.28
0.00
0.00
157,872.09
191.30
0.00
370.65
179.35
130.81
0.00
130.81
310.16
310.16
912828Q78 US Treasury
Note
1.375% Due 04/30/2021
05/25/2017
05/31/2017
210,000.00
209,046.22
0.00
0.00
209,093.36
972.96
0.00
1,208.36
235.40
47.14
0.00
47.14
282.54
282.54
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 20
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Income Earned
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description
Trade Date
Settle Date
Units
Book Value: Begin
Book Value: Acq
Book Value: Disp
Book Value: End
Prior Accrued
Inc. Received
Ending Accrued
Total Interest
Accr. Of Discount
Amort. Of Premium
Net Accret/Amort
Income Earned
Total Income
912828S76 US Treasury
Note
1.125% Due 07/31/2021
11/29/2017
11/30/2017
260,000.00
255,912.25
0.00
0.00
256,087.69
254.35
0.00
492.80
238.45
175.44
0.00
175.44
413.89
413.89
912828T34 US Treasury
Note
1.125% Due 09/30/2021
05/30/2018
05/31/2018
125,000.00
121,377.42
0.00
0.00
121,520.42
591.70
703.13
3.84
115.27
143.00
0.00
143.00
258.27
258.27
912828UB4 US Treasury
Note
1% Due 11/30/2019
10/26/2016
10/31/2016
125,000.00
124,985.58
0.00
0.00
124,990.39
317.62
0.00
420.08
102.46
4.81
0.00
4.81
107.27
107.27
912828UV0 US Treasury
Note
1.125% Due 03/31/2020
11/17/2015
11/18/2015
195,000.00
194,475.64
0.00
0.00
194,549.84
923.05
1,096.88
5.99
179.82
74.20
0.00
74.20
254.02
254.02
912828W89 US Treasury
Note
1.875% Due 03/31/2022
04/26/2018
04/27/2018
200,000.00
195,750.65
0.00
0.00
195,885.98
1,577.87
1,875.00
10.25
307.38
135.33
0.00
135.33
442.71
442.71
912828WN6 US Treasury
Note
2% Due 05/31/2021
04/29/2019
04/30/2019
200,000.00
199,012.28
0.00
0.00
199,058.73
1,016.39
0.00
1,344.26
327.87
46.45
0.00
46.45
374.32
374.32
912828Y61 US Treasury
Note
2.75% Due 07/31/2023
12/27/2018
12/28/2018
175,000.00
176,043.30
0.00
0.00
176,021.40
418.48
0.00
810.80
392.32
0.00
21.90
(21.90)
370.42
370.42
931142EJ8 Wal-Mart Stores
Note
3.125% Due 06/23/2021
Various
Various
200,000.00
200,568.49
0.00
0.00
200,542.70
1,180.56
0.00
1,701.39
520.83
0.00
25.79
(25.79)
495.04
495.04
Total Fixed Income 10,176,052.15
10,087,217.54
451,658.40
365,211.42
10,174,314.05
48,291.28
21,940.64
43,694.80
17,344.16
1,849.09
1,199.56
649.53
17,993.69 17,993.69
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 21
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Income Earned
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
CUSIP Security Description
Trade Date
Settle Date
Units
Book Value: Begin
Book Value: Acq
Book Value: Disp
Book Value: End
Prior Accrued
Inc. Received
Ending Accrued
Total Interest
Accr. Of Discount
Amort. Of Premium
Net Accret/Amort
Income Earned
Total Income
CASH & EQUIVALENT
31846V203 First American
Govt Obligation Fund Class Y
Various
Various
138,864.59
203,932.78
135,242.78
200,310.97
138,864.59
0.00
445.12
0.00
445.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
445.12
445.12
62479MXN8 MUFG Bank Ltd/NY
Discount CP
2.27% Due 10/22/2019
06/20/2019
06/20/2019
200,000.00
199,356.83
0.00
0.00
199,735.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
378.34
0.00
378.34
378.34
378.34
89233GA71 Toyota Motor Credit
Discount CP
2.14% Due 01/07/2020
07/22/2019
07/22/2019
200,000.00
198,478.22
0.00
0.00
198,834.89
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
356.67
0.00
356.67
356.67
356.67
Total Cash & Equivalent 538,864.59
601,767.83
135,242.78
200,310.97
537,434.65
0.00
445.12
0.00
445.12
735.01
0.00
735.01
1,180.13 1,180.13
TOTAL PORTFOLIO 10,714,916.74
10,688,985.37
586,901.18
565,522.39
10,711,748.70
48,291.28
22,385.76
43,694.80
17,789.28
2,584.10
1,199.56
1,384.54
19,173.82 19,173.82
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 22
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Cash Flow Report
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
10/02/2019 Maturity 3137EADM8 155,000.00 FHLMC Note
1.25% Due 10/2/2019
155,000.00 968.75 155,968.75
10/15/2019 Call 166764AN0 130,000.00 Chevron Corp Callable Note Cont 10/15/2019
2.193% Due 11/15/2019
130,000.00 1,187.88 131,187.88
10/15/2019 Paydown 47788BAD6 65,391.66 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.82% Due 10/15/2021
4,603.03 99.18 4,702.21
10/15/2019 Paydown 89238BAB8 33,057.98 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2018-A A2A
2.1% Due 10/15/2020
3,421.74 57.85 3,479.59
10/15/2019 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 HAROT 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
3,364.50 118.67 3,483.17
10/15/2019 Paydown 65478WAE5 130,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2016-C A4
1.38% Due 1/17/2023
5,118.00 149.50 5,267.50
10/15/2019 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 JDOT 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
744.20 73.67 817.87
10/15/2019 Paydown 47789JAB2 45,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2
2.85% Due 12/15/2021
1,615.95 106.88 1,722.83
10/20/2019 Interest 3137EAEF2 250,000.00 FHLMC Note
1.375% Due 4/20/2020
0.00 1,718.75 1,718.75
10/21/2019 Paydown 43815HAC1 70,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
5,122.52 172.08 5,294.60
10/22/2019 Maturity 62479MXN8 200,000.00 MUFG Bank Ltd/NY Discount CP
2.27% Due 10/22/2019
200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00
10/27/2019 Paydown 65478VAD9 12,602.51 NAROT 2016-B A3
1.32% Due 1/15/2021
777.33 13.86 791.19
10/31/2019 Interest 912828Q78 210,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.375% Due 4/30/2021
0.00 1,443.75 1,443.75
OCT 2019 509,767.27 6,110.82 515,878.09
11/01/2019 Interest 3137EADR7 225,000.00 FHLMC Note
1.375% Due 5/1/2020
0.00 1,546.88 1,546.88
11/03/2019 Interest 037833AK6 200,000.00 Apple Inc Note
2.4% Due 5/3/2023
0.00 2,400.00 2,400.00
11/11/2019 Interest 369550BE7 125,000.00 General Dynamics Corp Note
3% Due 5/11/2021
0.00 1,875.00 1,875.00
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 23
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Cash Flow Report
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
11/15/2019 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 JDOT 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
745.75 72.30 818.05
11/15/2019 Paydown 47789JAB2 45,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2
2.85% Due 12/15/2021
1,619.78 103.04 1,722.82
11/15/2019 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 HAROT 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
3,301.01 113.68 3,414.69
11/15/2019 Paydown 47788BAD6 65,391.66 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.82% Due 10/15/2021
4,440.02 92.20 4,532.22
11/15/2019 Paydown 65478WAE5 130,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2016-C A4
1.38% Due 1/17/2023
5,124.77 143.61 5,268.38
11/15/2019 Paydown 89238BAB8 33,057.98 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2018-A A2A
2.1% Due 10/15/2020
3,276.86 51.86 3,328.72
11/17/2019 Interest 3137EAEK1 225,000.00 FHLMC Note
1.875% Due 11/17/2020
0.00 2,109.38 2,109.38
11/21/2019 Interest 808513AW5 150,000.00 Charles Schwab Corp Callable Note Cont 4/21/2021
3.25% Due 5/21/2021
0.00 2,437.50 2,437.50
11/21/2019 Paydown 43815HAC1 70,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
4,948.45 159.49 5,107.94
11/27/2019 Paydown 65478VAD9 12,602.51 NAROT 2016-B A3
1.32% Due 1/15/2021
778.69 13.01 791.70
11/30/2019 Interest 912828M98 205,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.625% Due 11/30/2020
0.00 1,665.63 1,665.63
11/30/2019 Interest 912828G53 220,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 11/30/2021
0.00 2,062.50 2,062.50
11/30/2019 Interest 912828M80 200,000.00 US Treasury Note
2% Due 11/30/2022
0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00
11/30/2019 Interest 912828WN6 200,000.00 US Treasury Note
2% Due 5/31/2021
0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00
11/30/2019 Maturity 912828UB4 125,000.00 US Treasury Note
1% Due 11/30/2019
125,000.00 625.00 125,625.00
NOV 2019 149,235.33 19,471.08 168,706.41
12/08/2019 Interest 3130A0F70 220,000.00 FHLB Note
3.375% Due 12/8/2023
0.00 3,712.50 3,712.50
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 24
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Cash Flow Report
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
12/09/2019 Interest 3130A3KM5 100,000.00 FHLB Note
2.5% Due 12/9/2022
0.00 1,250.00 1,250.00
12/10/2019 Interest 313379Q69 200,000.00 FHLB Note
2.125% Due 6/10/2022
0.00 2,125.00 2,125.00
12/11/2019 Interest 3130A3UQ5 225,000.00 FHLB Note
1.875% Due 12/11/2020
0.00 2,109.38 2,109.38
12/12/2019 Interest 313383HU8 130,000.00 FHLB Note
1.75% Due 6/12/2020
0.00 1,137.50 1,137.50
12/14/2019 Interest 3130A1XJ2 210,000.00 FHLB Note
2.875% Due 6/14/2024
0.00 3,018.76 3,018.76
12/15/2019 Paydown 47788BAD6 65,391.66 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.82% Due 10/15/2021
4,276.68 85.46 4,362.14
12/15/2019 Paydown 89238BAB8 33,057.98 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2018-A A2A
2.1% Due 10/15/2020
3,131.54 46.13 3,177.67
12/15/2019 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 JDOT 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
747.31 70.92 818.23
12/15/2019 Paydown 47789JAB2 45,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2
2.85% Due 12/15/2021
1,623.61 99.19 1,722.80
12/15/2019 Paydown 65478WAE5 130,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2016-C A4
1.38% Due 1/17/2023
5,131.54 137.72 5,269.26
12/15/2019 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 HAROT 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
3,237.37 108.78 3,346.15
12/19/2019 Interest 3137EAEN5 200,000.00 FHLMC Note
2.75% Due 6/19/2023
0.00 2,750.00 2,750.00
12/21/2019 Paydown 43815HAC1 70,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
4,773.74 147.33 4,921.07
12/23/2019 Call 46625HKA7 125,000.00 JP Morgan Chase Callable Note Cont 12/23/2019
2.25% Due 1/23/2020
125,000.00 1,171.88 126,171.88
12/23/2019 Interest 931142EJ8 200,000.00 Wal-Mart Stores Note
3.125% Due 6/23/2021
0.00 3,125.00 3,125.00
12/27/2019 Paydown 65478VAD9 12,602.51 NAROT 2016-B A3
1.32% Due 1/15/2021
780.06 12.15 792.21
DEC 2019 148,701.85 21,107.70 169,809.55
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 25
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Cash Flow Report
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
01/07/2020 Maturity 89233GA71 200,000.00 Toyota Motor Credit Discount CP
2.14% Due 1/7/2020
200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00
01/10/2020 Interest 24422EUR8 150,000.00 John Deere Capital Corp Note
3.45% Due 1/10/2024
0.00 2,587.50 2,587.50
01/11/2020 Interest 06051GEU9 130,000.00 Bank of America Corp Note
3.3% Due 1/11/2023
0.00 2,145.00 2,145.00
01/11/2020 Interest 89236TDP7 130,000.00 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Note
2.6% Due 1/11/2022
0.00 1,690.00 1,690.00
01/15/2020 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 HAROT 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
3,173.57 103.98 3,277.55
01/15/2020 Paydown 65478WAE5 130,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2016-C A4
1.38% Due 1/17/2023
5,138.32 131.82 5,270.14
01/15/2020 Paydown 89238BAB8 33,057.98 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2018-A A2A
2.1% Due 10/15/2020
2,985.80 40.65 3,026.45
01/15/2020 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 JDOT 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
748.86 69.55 818.41
01/15/2020 Paydown 47788BAD6 65,391.66 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.82% Due 10/15/2021
4,112.99 78.98 4,191.97
01/15/2020 Paydown 47789JAB2 45,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2
2.85% Due 12/15/2021
1,627.46 95.33 1,722.79
01/17/2020 Maturity 3137EAEE5 260,000.00 FHLMC Note
1.5% Due 1/17/2020
260,000.00 1,950.00 261,950.00
01/19/2020 Interest 3135G0T94 290,000.00 FNMA Note
2.375% Due 1/19/2023
0.00 3,443.75 3,443.75
01/21/2020 Maturity 3135G0A78 245,000.00 FNMA Note
1.625% Due 1/21/2020
245,000.00 1,990.63 246,990.63
01/21/2020 Paydown 43815HAC1 70,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
4,598.38 135.59 4,733.97
01/27/2020 Paydown 65478VAD9 12,602.51 NAROT 2016-B A3
1.32% Due 1/15/2021
781.43 11.29 792.72
01/29/2020 Interest 91159HHL7 125,000.00 US Bancorp Callable Note 1X 12/29/2020
2.35% Due 1/29/2021
0.00 1,468.75 1,468.75
01/29/2020 Interest 3130A5Z77 125,000.00 FHLB Note
1.83% Due 7/29/2020
0.00 1,143.75 1,143.75
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 26
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Cash Flow Report
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
01/29/2020 Interest 06406RAE7 145,000.00 Bank of NY Mellon Corp Callable Note Cont
12/29/2022
2.95% Due 1/29/2023
0.00 2,138.75 2,138.75
01/31/2020 Interest 912828N89 160,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.375% Due 1/31/2021
0.00 1,100.00 1,100.00
01/31/2020 Interest 912828S76 260,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 7/31/2021
0.00 1,462.50 1,462.50
01/31/2020 Interest 912828Y61 175,000.00 US Treasury Note
2.75% Due 7/31/2023
0.00 2,406.25 2,406.25
JAN 2020 728,166.81 24,194.07 752,360.88
02/15/2020 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 HAROT 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
3,109.62 99.27 3,208.89
02/15/2020 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 JDOT 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
750.42 68.17 818.59
02/15/2020 Paydown 47789JAB2 45,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2
2.85% Due 12/15/2021
1,631.31 91.47 1,722.78
02/15/2020 Paydown 47788BAD6 65,391.66 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.82% Due 10/15/2021
3,948.98 72.74 4,021.72
02/15/2020 Paydown 65478WAE5 130,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2016-C A4
1.38% Due 1/17/2023
5,145.11 125.91 5,271.02
02/15/2020 Paydown 89238BAB8 33,057.98 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2018-A A2A
2.1% Due 10/15/2020
2,839.63 35.42 2,875.05
02/17/2020 Interest 3135G0N82 315,000.00 FNMA Note
1.25% Due 8/17/2021
0.00 1,968.75 1,968.75
02/18/2020 Interest 3130A7CV5 200,000.00 FHLB Note
1.375% Due 2/18/2021
0.00 1,375.00 1,375.00
02/18/2020 Interest 857477AS2 125,000.00 State Street Bank Note
2.55% Due 8/18/2020
0.00 1,593.75 1,593.75
02/21/2020 Paydown 43815HAC1 70,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
4,422.36 124.29 4,546.65
02/27/2020 Paydown 65478VAD9 12,602.51 NAROT 2016-B A3
1.32% Due 1/15/2021
782.81 10.43 793.24
02/28/2020 Interest 17275RBD3 150,000.00 Cisco Systems Note
2.2% Due 2/28/2021
0.00 1,650.00 1,650.00
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 27
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Cash Flow Report
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
02/28/2020 Maturity 3135G0T29 205,000.00 FNMA Note
1.5% Due 2/28/2020
205,000.00 1,537.50 206,537.50
02/29/2020 Interest 912828L24 150,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 8/31/2022
0.00 1,406.25 1,406.25
02/29/2020 Interest 912828L32 200,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.375% Due 8/31/2020
0.00 1,375.00 1,375.00
FEB 2020 227,630.24 11,533.95 239,164.19
03/06/2020 Interest 3135G0W33 200,000.00 FNMA Note
1.375% Due 9/6/2022
0.00 1,375.00 1,375.00
03/08/2020 Interest 313383YJ4 200,000.00 FHLB Note
3.375% Due 9/8/2023
0.00 3,375.00 3,375.00
03/11/2020 Interest 313378WG2 300,000.00 FHLB Note
2.5% Due 3/11/2022
0.00 3,750.00 3,750.00
03/15/2020 Interest 084670BR8 150,000.00 Berkshire Hathaway Callable Note Cont 1/15/2023
2.75% Due 3/15/2023
0.00 2,062.50 2,062.50
03/15/2020 Interest 68389XBK0 200,000.00 Oracle Corp Callable Note Cont 8/15/2021
1.9% Due 9/15/2021
0.00 1,900.00 1,900.00
03/15/2020 Paydown 89238BAB8 33,057.98 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2018-A A2A
2.1% Due 10/15/2020
2,693.02 30.45 2,723.47
03/15/2020 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 HAROT 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
3,045.50 94.66 3,140.16
03/15/2020 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 JDOT 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
751.98 66.79 818.77
03/15/2020 Paydown 65478WAE5 130,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2016-C A4
1.38% Due 1/17/2023
5,151.91 119.99 5,271.90
03/15/2020 Paydown 47788BAD6 65,391.66 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.82% Due 10/15/2021
3,784.62 66.75 3,851.37
03/15/2020 Paydown 47789JAB2 45,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2
2.85% Due 12/15/2021
1,635.17 87.59 1,722.76
03/21/2020 Paydown 43815HAC1 70,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
4,245.71 113.41 4,359.12
03/24/2020 Interest 02665WAZ4 150,000.00 American Honda Finance Note
2.45% Due 9/24/2020
0.00 1,837.50 1,837.50
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 28
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Cash Flow Report
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
03/27/2020 Paydown 65478VAD9 12,602.51 NAROT 2016-B A3
1.32% Due 1/15/2021
784.18 9.57 793.75
03/31/2020 Interest 912828W89 200,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 3/31/2022
0.00 1,875.00 1,875.00
03/31/2020 Interest 912828T34 125,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 9/30/2021
0.00 703.13 703.13
03/31/2020 Interest 9128284D9 210,000.00 US Treasury Note
2.5% Due 3/31/2023
0.00 2,625.00 2,625.00
03/31/2020 Maturity 912828UV0 195,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 3/31/2020
195,000.00 1,096.88 196,096.88
MAR 2020 217,092.09 21,189.22 238,281.31
04/15/2020 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 HAROT 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
2,981.24 90.14 3,071.38
04/15/2020 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 JDOT 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
753.55 65.40 818.95
04/15/2020 Paydown 47789JAB2 45,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2
2.85% Due 12/15/2021
1,639.04 83.71 1,722.75
04/15/2020 Paydown 89238BAB8 33,057.98 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2018-A A2A
2.1% Due 10/15/2020
2,545.98 25.74 2,571.72
04/15/2020 Paydown 47788BAD6 65,391.66 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.82% Due 10/15/2021
3,619.92 61.01 3,680.93
04/15/2020 Paydown 65478WAE5 130,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2016-C A4
1.38% Due 1/17/2023
5,158.72 114.07 5,272.79
04/20/2020 Maturity 3137EAEF2 250,000.00 FHLMC Note
1.375% Due 4/20/2020
250,000.00 1,718.75 251,718.75
04/21/2020 Paydown 43815HAC1 70,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
4,068.38 102.98 4,171.36
04/27/2020 Paydown 65478VAD9 12,602.51 NAROT 2016-B A3
1.32% Due 1/15/2021
785.56 8.71 794.27
04/30/2020 Interest 912828Q78 210,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.375% Due 4/30/2021
0.00 1,443.75 1,443.75
APR 2020 271,552.39 3,714.26 275,266.65
05/01/2020 Maturity 3137EADR7 225,000.00 FHLMC Note
1.375% Due 5/1/2020
225,000.00 1,546.88 226,546.88
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 29
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Cash Flow Report
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
05/03/2020 Interest 037833AK6 200,000.00 Apple Inc Note
2.4% Due 5/3/2023
0.00 2,400.00 2,400.00
05/11/2020 Interest 369550BE7 125,000.00 General Dynamics Corp Note
3% Due 5/11/2021
0.00 1,875.00 1,875.00
05/15/2020 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 JDOT 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
755.12 64.01 819.13
05/15/2020 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 HAROT 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
2,916.82 85.72 3,002.54
05/15/2020 Paydown 65478WAE5 130,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2016-C A4
1.38% Due 1/17/2023
5,165.53 108.14 5,273.67
05/15/2020 Paydown 89238BAB8 33,057.98 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2018-A A2A
2.1% Due 10/15/2020
2,398.49 21.29 2,419.78
05/15/2020 Paydown 47789JAB2 45,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2
2.85% Due 12/15/2021
1,642.91 79.82 1,722.73
05/15/2020 Paydown 47788BAD6 65,391.66 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.82% Due 10/15/2021
3,454.89 55.52 3,510.41
05/17/2020 Interest 3137EAEK1 225,000.00 FHLMC Note
1.875% Due 11/17/2020
0.00 2,109.38 2,109.38
05/21/2020 Interest 808513AW5 150,000.00 Charles Schwab Corp Callable Note Cont 4/21/2021
3.25% Due 5/21/2021
0.00 2,437.50 2,437.50
05/21/2020 Paydown 43815HAC1 70,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
3,890.40 92.98 3,983.38
05/27/2020 Paydown 65478VAD9 12,602.51 NAROT 2016-B A3
1.32% Due 1/15/2021
786.94 7.85 794.79
05/31/2020 Interest 912828WN6 200,000.00 US Treasury Note
2% Due 5/31/2021
0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00
05/31/2020 Interest 912828M80 200,000.00 US Treasury Note
2% Due 11/30/2022
0.00 2,000.00 2,000.00
05/31/2020 Interest 912828G53 220,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 11/30/2021
0.00 2,062.50 2,062.50
05/31/2020 Interest 912828M98 205,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.625% Due 11/30/2020
0.00 1,665.63 1,665.63
MAY 2020 246,011.10 18,612.22 264,623.32
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 30
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Cash Flow Report
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
06/08/2020 Interest 3130A0F70 220,000.00 FHLB Note
3.375% Due 12/8/2023
0.00 3,712.50 3,712.50
06/09/2020 Interest 3130A3KM5 100,000.00 FHLB Note
2.5% Due 12/9/2022
0.00 1,250.00 1,250.00
06/10/2020 Interest 313379Q69 200,000.00 FHLB Note
2.125% Due 6/10/2022
0.00 2,125.00 2,125.00
06/11/2020 Interest 3130A3UQ5 225,000.00 FHLB Note
1.875% Due 12/11/2020
0.00 2,109.38 2,109.38
06/12/2020 Maturity 313383HU8 130,000.00 FHLB Note
1.75% Due 6/12/2020
130,000.00 1,137.50 131,137.50
06/14/2020 Interest 3130A1XJ2 210,000.00 FHLB Note
2.875% Due 6/14/2024
0.00 3,018.76 3,018.76
06/15/2020 Paydown 47788BAD6 65,391.66 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.82% Due 10/15/2021
3,289.51 50.28 3,339.79
06/15/2020 Paydown 65478WAE5 130,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2016-C A4
1.38% Due 1/17/2023
5,172.36 102.20 5,274.56
06/15/2020 Paydown 89238BAB8 33,057.98 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2018-A A2A
2.1% Due 10/15/2020
2,250.58 17.09 2,267.67
06/15/2020 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 JDOT 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
756.70 62.62 819.32
06/15/2020 Paydown 47789JAB2 45,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2
2.85% Due 12/15/2021
1,646.80 75.92 1,722.72
06/15/2020 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 HAROT 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
2,852.24 81.39 2,933.63
06/19/2020 Interest 3137EAEN5 200,000.00 FHLMC Note
2.75% Due 6/19/2023
0.00 2,750.00 2,750.00
06/21/2020 Paydown 43815HAC1 70,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
3,711.76 83.41 3,795.17
06/23/2020 Interest 931142EJ8 200,000.00 Wal-Mart Stores Note
3.125% Due 6/23/2021
0.00 3,125.00 3,125.00
06/27/2020 Paydown 65478VAD9 12,602.51 NAROT 2016-B A3
1.32% Due 1/15/2021
788.32 6.98 795.30
JUN 2020 150,468.27 19,708.03 170,176.30
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 31
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Cash Flow Report
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
07/10/2020 Interest 24422EUR8 150,000.00 John Deere Capital Corp Note
3.45% Due 1/10/2024
0.00 2,587.50 2,587.50
07/11/2020 Interest 06051GEU9 130,000.00 Bank of America Corp Note
3.3% Due 1/11/2023
0.00 2,145.00 2,145.00
07/11/2020 Interest 89236TDP7 130,000.00 Toyota Motor Credit Corp Note
2.6% Due 1/11/2022
0.00 1,690.00 1,690.00
07/15/2020 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 JDOT 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
758.27 61.23 819.50
07/15/2020 Paydown 65478WAE5 130,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2016-C A4
1.38% Due 1/17/2023
5,179.20 96.25 5,275.45
07/15/2020 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 HAROT 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
2,787.51 77.16 2,864.67
07/15/2020 Paydown 89238BAB8 33,057.98 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2018-A A2A
2.1% Due 10/15/2020
2,102.22 13.15 2,115.37
07/15/2020 Paydown 47788BAD6 65,391.66 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.82% Due 10/15/2021
3,123.80 45.29 3,169.09
07/15/2020 Paydown 47789JAB2 45,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2
2.85% Due 12/15/2021
1,650.70 72.01 1,722.71
07/19/2020 Interest 3135G0T94 290,000.00 FNMA Note
2.375% Due 1/19/2023
0.00 3,443.75 3,443.75
07/21/2020 Paydown 43815HAC1 70,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
3,532.46 74.29 3,606.75
07/27/2020 Paydown 65478VAD9 12,602.51 NAROT 2016-B A3
1.32% Due 1/15/2021
789.71 6.11 795.82
07/29/2020 Interest 91159HHL7 125,000.00 US Bancorp Callable Note 1X 12/29/2020
2.35% Due 1/29/2021
0.00 1,468.75 1,468.75
07/29/2020 Interest 06406RAE7 145,000.00 Bank of NY Mellon Corp Callable Note Cont
12/29/2022
2.95% Due 1/29/2023
0.00 2,138.75 2,138.75
07/29/2020 Maturity 3130A5Z77 125,000.00 FHLB Note
1.83% Due 7/29/2020
125,000.00 1,143.75 126,143.75
07/31/2020 Interest 912828N89 160,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.375% Due 1/31/2021
0.00 1,100.00 1,100.00
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 32
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Cash Flow Report
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
07/31/2020 Interest 912828S76 260,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.125% Due 7/31/2021
0.00 1,462.50 1,462.50
07/31/2020 Interest 912828Y61 175,000.00 US Treasury Note
2.75% Due 7/31/2023
0.00 2,406.25 2,406.25
JUL 2020 144,923.87 20,031.74 164,955.61
08/15/2020 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 HAROT 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
2,722.61 73.03 2,795.64
08/15/2020 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 JDOT 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
759.85 59.83 819.68
08/15/2020 Paydown 47789JAB2 45,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2
2.85% Due 12/15/2021
1,654.61 68.08 1,722.69
08/15/2020 Paydown 47788BAD6 65,391.66 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.82% Due 10/15/2021
2,957.74 40.55 2,998.29
08/15/2020 Paydown 65478WAE5 130,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2016-C A4
1.38% Due 1/17/2023
5,186.05 90.29 5,276.34
08/15/2020 Paydown 89238BAB8 33,057.98 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2018-A A2A
2.1% Due 10/15/2020
1,953.43 9.47 1,962.90
08/17/2020 Interest 3135G0N82 315,000.00 FNMA Note
1.25% Due 8/17/2021
0.00 1,968.75 1,968.75
08/18/2020 Interest 3130A7CV5 200,000.00 FHLB Note
1.375% Due 2/18/2021
0.00 1,375.00 1,375.00
08/18/2020 Maturity 857477AS2 125,000.00 State Street Bank Note
2.55% Due 8/18/2020
125,000.00 1,593.75 126,593.75
08/21/2020 Paydown 43815HAC1 70,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
3,352.50 65.60 3,418.10
08/27/2020 Paydown 65478VAD9 12,602.51 NAROT 2016-B A3
1.32% Due 1/15/2021
791.10 5.24 796.34
08/28/2020 Interest 17275RBD3 150,000.00 Cisco Systems Note
2.2% Due 2/28/2021
0.00 1,650.00 1,650.00
08/31/2020 Interest 912828L24 150,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.875% Due 8/31/2022
0.00 1,406.25 1,406.25
08/31/2020 Maturity 912828L32 200,000.00 US Treasury Note
1.375% Due 8/31/2020
200,000.00 1,375.00 201,375.00
AUG 2020 344,377.89 9,780.84 354,158.73
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 33
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Cash Flow Report
As of September 30, 2019
City of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Payment Date Transaction Type CUSIP Quantity Security Description Principal Amount Income Total Amount
09/06/2020 Interest 3135G0W33 200,000.00 FNMA Note
1.375% Due 9/6/2022
0.00 1,375.00 1,375.00
09/08/2020 Interest 313383YJ4 200,000.00 FHLB Note
3.375% Due 9/8/2023
0.00 3,375.00 3,375.00
09/11/2020 Interest 313378WG2 300,000.00 FHLB Note
2.5% Due 3/11/2022
0.00 3,750.00 3,750.00
09/15/2020 Interest 084670BR8 150,000.00 Berkshire Hathaway Callable Note Cont 1/15/2023
2.75% Due 3/15/2023
0.00 2,062.50 2,062.50
09/15/2020 Interest 68389XBK0 200,000.00 Oracle Corp Callable Note Cont 8/15/2021
1.9% Due 9/15/2021
0.00 1,900.00 1,900.00
09/15/2020 Paydown 89238BAB8 33,057.98 Toyota Auto Receivables Owner 2018-A A2A
2.1% Due 10/15/2020
1,804.19 6.05 1,810.24
09/15/2020 Paydown 477870AC3 40,000.00 JDOT 2019-B A3
2.21% Due 12/15/2023
761.44 58.43 819.87
09/15/2020 Paydown 43815NAC8 80,000.00 HAROT 2019-3 A3
1.78% Due 8/15/2023
2,657.56 68.99 2,726.55
09/15/2020 Paydown 65478WAE5 130,000.00 Nissan Auto Receivables Owner 2016-C A4
1.38% Due 1/17/2023
5,192.90 84.33 5,277.23
09/15/2020 Paydown 47788BAD6 65,391.66 John Deere Owner Trust 2017-B A3
1.82% Due 10/15/2021
2,791.33 36.07 2,827.40
09/15/2020 Paydown 47789JAB2 45,000.00 John Deere Owner Trust 2019-A A2
2.85% Due 12/15/2021
1,658.52 64.16 1,722.68
09/21/2020 Paydown 43815HAC1 70,000.00 Honda Auto Receivables Owner 2018-3 A3
2.95% Due 8/22/2022
3,171.86 57.36 3,229.22
09/24/2020 Maturity 02665WAZ4 150,000.00 American Honda Finance Note
2.45% Due 9/24/2020
150,000.00 1,837.50 151,837.50
09/27/2020 Paydown 65478VAD9 12,602.51 NAROT 2016-B A3
1.32% Due 1/15/2021
792.49 4.37 796.86
SEP 2020 168,830.29 14,679.76 183,510.05
TOTAL 3,306,757.40 190,133.69 3,496,891.09
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 34
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Important DisclosuresCity of San Jacinto
Account #10167
Chandler Asset Management, Inc. ;͞Chandler͟Ϳis an SEC registered investment adviser. For additional information about our firm, please see our current disclosures (Form ADV). To
obtain a copy of our current disclosures, you may contact your client service representative by calling the number on the front of this statement or you may visit our website at
www.chandlerasset.com.
Information contained in this monthly statement is confidential and is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as specific investment or legal advice. The
information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable as of the date of this statement, but may become outdated or superseded at any time without
notice.
Custody: Your qualified custodian bank maintains control of all assets reflected in this statement and we urge you to compare this statement to the one you receive from your qualified
custodian. Chandler does not have any authority to withdraw or deposit funds from/to the custodian account.
Valuation: Prices are provided by IDC, an independent pricing source. In the event IDC does not provide a price or if the price provided is not reflective of fair market value, Chandler will
obtain pricing from an alternative approved third party pricing source in accordance with our written valuation policy and procedures. Our valuation procedures are also disclosed in
Item 5 of our Form ADV Part 2A.
Performance: Performance results are presented gross-of-advisory fees and represent the client ͛s Total Return. The deduction of advisory fees lowers performance results. These results
include the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings. Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, clients should not assume that future performance of any
specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable or equal to past performance levels. All investment strategies have the potential for profit or loss. Economic factors, market
conditions or changes in investment strategies, contributions or withdrawals may materially alter the performance and results of your portfolio.
Source ice Data Indices, LLC ("ICE"), used with permission. ICE PERMITS USE OF THE ICE INDICES AND RELATED DATA ON AN "AS IS" BASIS; ICE, ITS AFFILIATES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE
THIRD PARTY SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS, EXPRESS AND/OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS
FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, INCLUDING THE INDICES, INDEX DATA AND ANY DATA INCLUDED IN, RELATED TO, OR DERIVED THEREFROM. NEITHER ICE DATA, ITS AFFILIATES OR
THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY PROVIDERS GUARANTEE THE QUALITY, ADEQUACY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INDICES OR THE INDEX DATA OR ANY
COMPONENT THEREOF, AND THE INDICES AND INDEX DATA AND ALL COMPONENTS THEREOF ARE PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" BASIS AND LICENSEE'S USE IS AT LICENSEE'S OWN RISK. ICE
DATA, ITS AFFILIATES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE THIRD PARTY DO NOT SPONSOR, ENDORSE, OR RECOMMEND CHANDLER, OR ANY OF ITS PRODUCTS OR SERVICES.
Index returns assume reinvestment of all distributions. Historical performance results for investment indexes generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial
charges or the deduction of an investment management fee, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results. It is not possible to invest
directly in an index.
Ratings: Ratings information have been provided by Moody͛s, S&P and Fitch through data feeds we believe to be reliable as of the date of this statement, however we cannot guarantee
its accuracy.
Security level ratings for U.S. Agency issued mortgage-backed securities ;͞MBS͟Ϳreflect the issuer rating because the securities themselves are not rated. The issuing U.S. Agency
guarantees the full and timely payment of both principal and interest and carries a AA+/Aaa/AAA by S&P, Moody ͛s and Fitch respectively.
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 35
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Benchmark Index & DisclosuresCity of San Jacinto California
Account #10167
Benchmark Index Disclosure
ICE BAML 1-3 Yr US Treasury Index The ICE BAML 1-3 Year US Treasury Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated sovereign debt publicly issued by the US
government in its domestic market. Qualifying securities must have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than three
years remaining term to final maturity, a fixed coupon schedule and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion. Qualifying securities must
have at least 18 months to final maturity at the time of issuance. (Index: G1O2. Please visit www.mlindex.ml.com for more information)
ICE BAML 1-3 Yr US Corp/Govt Rated
AAA-A Index
The ICE BAML 1-3 AAA-A Year US Corporate & Government Index tracks the performance of US dollar denominated investment grade debt
publicly issued in the US domestic market, including US Treasury, US agency, foreign government, supranational and corporate securities.
Qualifying securities must be rated AAA through A3 (based on an average of Moody͛s, S&P and Fitch). In addition, qualifying securities must
have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and less than three years remaining term to final maturity, at least 18 months to final
maturity at point of issuance, a fixed coupon schedule and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion for US Treasuries and $250 million for
all other securities. (Index: GVPB. Please visit www.mlindex.ml.com for more information)
Execution Time: 10/1/2019 9:31:35 PMChandler Asset Management - CONFIDENTIAL Page 36
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
City of San Jacinto Public Trust Advisors LLC
595 S. San Jacinto Ave.550 South Hope Street
San Jacinto, CA 92583 Suite 560
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Monthly Investment Report for Period Ended September 30, 2019
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Investment Management Portfolio Review Page
Investment Portfolio Summary Comparison 3
Total Return Performance Summary 4
Investment Portfolio Maturity Distribution 5
Investment Portfolio Maturity Distribution By Security Type 6
Investment Portfolio Rating Distribution 7
Investment Portfolio Security Distribution - Market Value 8
Investment Portfolio Security Distribution - Historical Cost 9
Investment Portfolio Compliance 10
Additional Disclosure 11
Portfolio Holdings Detail 12
City of San Jacinto Summary
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
City of San Jacinto
September 1, 2019
Beginning Balance
September 30, 2019
Ending Balance Portfolio Characteristic
September 1, 2019
Beginning Balance
September 30, 2019
Ending Balance
Historical Cost 10,604,985.75$ 10,651,440.25$ Book Yield Gross 2.33%
Book Value 10,616,853.21$ 10,664,257.61$ Market Yield Gross 1.62%
Accrued Interest 53,964.97 40,193.44 Weighted Average Coupon 2.22%
Book Value Plus Accrued 10,670,818.18$ 10,704,451.05$ Duration 1.85 Years
Net Unrealized Gain/Loss 149,570.20 111,949.31 Weighted Effective Maturity 1.90 Years
Market Value Plus Accrued(2)10,820,388.38$ 10,816,400.36$ Weighted Final Maturity 1.91 Years
2.29%
1.73%
2.20%
1.85 Years
1.91 Years
1.91 Years
Net Pending Transactions 7,558.47 108.11
Market Value Plus Accrued Net(2)10,827,946.85$ 10,816,508.47$
City of San Jacinto
September 2019
Net Income Portfolio Compliance Compliant
Interest Income 19,319.02$ Security Distribution YES
Net Amortization/Accretion 828.48 Maturity Distribution YES
Net Realized Gain/Loss(3)6,139.18 Rating Distribution YES
Miscellaneous Income -
Net Income 26,286.68$
City of San Jacinto Summary Comparison for the period September 1, 2019 to September 30, 2019
(1) Payables represent amounts due to settle security transactions that have been executed but have not settled as of period end. The funds used to settle these trades may come from a variety of sources including cash within the
portfolio, proceeds from future security transactions including maturities and sales, or other sources including money market funds. For reporting purposes, a payable is created for over-period settlements which are reflected in the
detailed holdings.
(2) Market Value Plus Accrued Net represents the market value of the portfolio net payables and recievables from transactions that settle in the following reporting period.
(3) MBS paydowns may result in negative realized losses rather than amortization in as a result of accounting method.
Page 3
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Trailing Month Trailing 3 Months Trailing 12 Months Year to Date
Total Return Performance Periodic Periodic Periodic Periodic
City of San Jacinto -0.10%0.63%4.27%3.15%
BofA ML 1-3 Year U.S. Treasuries -0.11%0.58%4.36%3.03%
Trailing 3 Years Trailing 5 Years Since Inception*
Total Return Performance Annualized Annualized Annualized
City of San Jacinto 1.65%1.40%1.18%
BofA ML 1-3 Year U.S. Treasuries 1.52%1.32%1.09%
*Total return since inception date: December 1, 2012
Annualized total return performance presented for investment periods longer than one year. Return information obtained from Bloomberg.
City of San Jacinto Total Return September 1, 2019 to September 30, 2019
(0.10%)
0.63%
4.27%
3.15%
1.65%
1.18%
(0.11%)
0.58%
4.36%
3.03%
1.52%
1.09%
(0.50%)
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
3.50%
4.00%
4.50%
5.00%
Trailing Month Trailing 3 Months Trailing 12 Months Year to Date Trailing 3 Years Trailing 5 Years Since Inception*YieldTotal Return Performance vs. Benchmark
City of San Jacinto BofA ML 1-3 Year U.S. Treasuries
Page 4
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Maturity Distribution
September 1, 2019
Beginning Balance
September 30, 2019
Ending Balance Portfolio Allocation Distribution Change
0-3 Months 440,088.41$ 353,320.84$ 3.27%-0.80%
3-6 Months 450,348.96 751,456.56 6.95%2.79%
6-9 Months 679,773.10 453,551.50 4.19%-2.09%
9-12 Months 76,008.03 - 0.00%-0.70%
1-2 Years 3,856,250.80 3,954,240.09 36.56%0.92%
2-3 Years 4,395,028.13 4,038,503.06 37.34%-3.28%
3-4 Years 922,890.95 1,265,328.31 11.70%3.17%
4-5 Years - - 0.00%0.00%
5-6 Years - - 0.00%0.00%
6 Years +- - 0.00%0.00%
Total Portfolio 10,820,388.38$ 10,816,400.36$ 100.00%
City of San Jacinto Maturity Distribution Market Value Basis September 1, 2019 to September 30, 2019
$-
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
$4,000,000
$4,500,000
$5,000,000
0-3 M 3-6 M 6-9 M 9-12 M 1-2 Yr 2-3 Yr 3-4 Yr 4-5 Yr 5-6 Yr 6 Yr +
Maturity Distribution Comparison
September 1, 2019 September 30, 2019
0-3 M
3.27%
3-6 M
6.95%
6-9 M
4.19%
1-2 Yr
36.56%
2-3 Yr
37.34%
3-4 Yr
11.70%
Maturity Distribution
Page 5
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Security Distribution 0-3 Months 3-6 Months 6-9 Months 9-12 Months 1-2 Years 2-3 Years 3-4 Years 4-5 Years Total Portfolio
Cash -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Money Market Funds 106,766 - - - - - - - 106,766
Certificates of Deposit - - - - - - - - -
Commercial Paper - - - - - - - - -
U.S. Treasury Notes - - - - 3,423,437 3,321,852 1,265,328 - 8,010,617
U.S. Agency Notes - - - - - - - - -
Federal Inst. (GSE)*- - - - 530,803 459,419 - - 990,222
Corporate Notes 45,372 751,457 453,552 - - 257,232 - - 1,507,612
Asset Backed (ABS)201,183 - - - - - - - 201,183
Municipal Bonds - - - - - - - - -
Total 353,321$ 751,457$ 453,552$ -$ 3,954,240$ 4,038,503$ 1,265,328$ -$ 10,816,400$
*Mortgage backed securities shown to effective maturity.
City of San Jacinto Maturity Distribution Market Value Basis as of September 30, 2019
$-
$5,000,000
0-3 Months 3-6 Months 6-9 Months 9-12 Months 1-2 Years 2-3 Years 3-4 Years 4-5 Years
Maturity Distribution By Type Municipal Bonds
Asset Backed (ABS)
Corporate Notes
Federal Inst. (GSE)*
U.S. Agency Notes
U.S. Treasury Notes
Commercial Paper
Certificates of Deposit
Money Market Funds
Cash
Page 6
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
S&P Rating Distribution
September 30, 2019
Ending Balance Portfolio Allocation
Short Term Rating Distribution
A-1+-$ 0.00%
A-1 - 0.00%
A-2 - 0.00%
Total Short Term Ratings -$ 0.00%
Long Term Rating Distribution
AAA Rating 458,301.49$ 4.24%
AA Rating 9,247,508.26 85.50%
A Rating 1,110,590.61 10.27%
Below A - 0.00%
Not Rated - 0.00%
Total Long Term Rating 10,816,400.36$ 100.00%
Total Portfolio 10,816,400.36$ 100.00%
Moody's Rating Distribution
September 30, 2019
Ending Balance Portfolio Allocation
Short Term Rating Distribution
P-1 -$ 0.00%
P-2 - 0.00%
Total Short Term Ratings -$ 0.00%
Long Term Rating Distribution
Aaa Rating 9,534,645.57$ 88.15%
Aa Rating 171,164.18 1.58%
A Rating 1,110,590.61 10.27%
Below A - 0.00%
Not Rated - 0.00%
Total Long Term Rating 10,816,400.36$ 100.00%
Total Portfolio 10,816,400.36$ 100.00%
City of San Jacinto Rating Distribution Market Value Basis as of September 30, 2019
AAA Rating
4.24%
AA Rating
85.50%
A Rating
10.27%
Portfolio Allocation By Standard and Poors' Rating
Aaa Rating
88.15%Aa Rating
1.58%
A Rating
10.27%
Portfolio Allocation By Moody's Rating
Page 7
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Security Distribution
September 1, 2019
Beginning Balance
Portfolio
Allocation
September 30, 2019
Ending Balance Book Yield
Portfolio
Allocation
Change in
Allocation
Permitted by
Policy*Compliant
Cash -$ 0.00%-$ 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
LGIP - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
U.S. Treasury Notes 7,924,052.86 73.23%8,010,616.96 2.27%74.06%0.83%NO
U.S. Agency Notes - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
FNMA 133,775.39 1.24%133,535.37 2.65%1.23%0.00%NO
FHLMC 858,843.13 7.94%856,686.92 2.59%7.92%-0.02%NO
FFCB - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
FHLB - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Fed Instrumentality Subtotal 992,618.52$ 9.17%990,222.29$ 2.59%9.15%-0.02%NO
Asset Backed Securities 200,810.55 1.86%201,183.31 2.87%1.86%0.00%NO
Commercial Paper - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Corporate Notes 1,685,203.78 15.57%1,507,612.02 2.16%13.94%-1.64%NO
Bankers Acceptances - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Money Market Funds 17,702.68 0.16%106,765.78 1.52%0.99%0.82%YES
Municipal Bonds - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Intergovernmental Funds - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Certificates of Deposit - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Total Portfolio Market Value 10,820,388.38$ 100.00%10,816,400.36$ 2.29%100.00%
*Permitted allocation based on aggregate assets as defined within the investment policy.
City of San Jacinto Market Value Basis Security Distribution September 1, 2019 to September 30, 2019
$-
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
CashLGIPUSTAgencyFNMAFHLMCFFCBFHLBABSCPCorpBAMMFMuniInter GovCDAsset Balance By Security Type
(in millions)
September 1, 2019 September 30, 2019
UST
74.06%
FNMA
1.23%
FHLMC
7.92%
ABS
1.86%
Corp
13.94%
MMF
0.99%
Ending Portfolio Allocation
Page 8
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Security Distribution
September 1, 2019
Beginning Balance
Portfolio
Allocation
September 30, 2019
Ending Balance Book Yield
Portfolio
Allocation
Change in
Allocation
Permitted by
Policy*Compliant
Cash -$ 0.00%-$ 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
U.S. Treasury Notes 7,750,415.08 73.08%7,882,684.03 2.27%74.01%0.92%NO
U.S. Agency Notes - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
FNMA 129,906.40 1.22%129,906.40 2.65%1.22%-0.01%NO
FHLMC 841,495.50 7.93%841,495.50 2.59%7.90%-0.03%NO
FFCB - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
FHLB - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Fed Instrumentality Subtotal 971,401.90$ 9.16%971,401.90$ 2.59%9.12%-0.04%NO
Asset Backed Securities 197,429.69 1.86%197,429.69 2.87%1.85%-0.01%NO
Commercial Paper - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Corporate Notes 1,668,036.40 15.73%1,493,158.85 2.16%14.02%-1.71%NO
Bankers Acceptances - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Money Market Funds 17,702.68 0.17%106,765.78 1.52%1.00%0.84%NO
Municipal Bonds - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Intergovernmental Funds - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Certificates of Deposit - 0.00%- 0.00%0.00%0.00%YES
Total Portfolio Historical Cost 10,604,985.75$ 100.00%10,651,440.25$ 2.29%100.00%
*Permitted allocation based on aggregate assets as defined within the investment policy.
City of San Jacinto Historical Cost Basis Security Distribution September 1, 2019 to September 30, 2019
$-
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
CashUSTAgencyFNMAFHLMCFFCBFHLBABSCPCorpBAMMFMuniInter GovCDAsset Balance By Security Type
(in millions)
September 1, 2019 September 30, 2019
UST
74.01%
FNMA
1.22%
FHLMC
7.90%ABS
1.85%
Corp
14.02%
MMF
1.00%
Ending Portfolio Allocation
Page 9
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Policy
Section Description Compliance Requirement Compliant
Policy
Section Description Compliance Requirement Compliant
IX. 1 Municipal
Bonds
Rated in 4 highest general classifications by nationally recognized
rating service; 5% issuer limitation Compliant IX. 14 Pass-Through
Securities
Issuer debt rated at least A by 2 NRSRO; Must be rated in the AA
category by 2 NRSRO's; 20% total portfolio limit, 5-year maturity limit Compliant
IX. 2
U.S. Treasury No limitations Compliant IX. 15 Money Market
Funds
Registerd with SEC under 1940 Act, have highest ranking by 2
NRSRO's; Retained advisor registered (or exempt from registration)
with 5-years experience investing in securities authorized by CA
53601 and at least $500 million of assets; 20% total portfolio limit,
10% per fund limit
Compliant
IX. 3 Federal Agency No limitations Compliant IX. 16 Mutual Funds Authorize by CA Government Code Section 53601 Compliant
IX. 4 Bankers
Acceptances
Rated A1 or better and have long term debt rated A or better by 2
NRSRO's; Maturity ≤ to 180 days, 40% total portfolio limit, 5%
issuer limit
Compliant X.A.1 Futures and
Opions Prohibited Compliant
IX. 5
Federally
Insured Time
Deposits
Limited to amounts covered under federal insurance; 5-year
maturity limit Compliant X.A.2
Inverse Floaters,
Range Notes, and
Mortgage Derived
IO Strips
Prohibited Compliant
IX. 6 Time Deposits
Fully collateralized per CA law, 20% limit when combined with IX. 5;
Issuer must have long-term debt rated A or higher or short-term
debt rated A1 or higher by 2 NRSRO's, 5-year maturity limit
Compliant X.A.3 Potentail Zero
Accrual Securities Prohibited Compliant
IX.7 CDARS 30% limit in combination of CD's (including CDARS); 5-year maturity
limit Compliant X.A.5
Purchasing
Securities on
Margin
Prohibited Compliant
IX. 8 Negotiable CD's
Issuer must have long-term debt rated A or higher and/or short-
term debt rated A1 or higher by 2 NRSRO's; Maturity ≤ to 5 years,
30% total portfolio limit, 5% issuer limit
Compliant X.A.6 Reverse Repos or
other leverage Prohibited Compliant
IX. 9 Repurchase
Agreements
Collateralized at 102% in accordance with policy;1-year maturity
limit, no % portfolio limit, collateral held by custodian bank;Subject
to master repurchase agreement substantially in SIFMA's form
Compliant X.A.7 Foreign Currency
Securities Prohibited Compliant
IX. 10 Commercial
Paper
Issuer is organized and operating in the U.S. with assets of at least
$500 million; Issuer short-term ratings of A1 or higher and long-
term ratings of A or higher ny 2 NRSRO; Maturity ≤ 270 days; 25%
total portfolio limit; 5% issuer limit
Compliant X.B.2 Single Issuer
Limitation
5% issuer limitation, except U.S. Government and its agencies &
enterprises Compliant
IX. 11
Local Agency
Investment
Fund
70% total portfolio limit, up to the maximum permitted balance Compliant X.C.2 Callable Security
Limitation 20% of total portfolio (excluding Make Whole Call securities)Compliant
IX. 12
Local
Government
Investment
Pools
Riveride County Investment Fund limited to 70% of the portfolio;
JPA Pools limited to 50% of the portfolio Compliant X.C.3 Maximum
Security Maturity Individual security maturities limited to 5-years or less Compliant
IX. 13 Corporate
Bonds
Corporations organized and operating in the U.S. or depository
institutions licensed by the U.S. or any state and operating in the
U.S.; Rated in the A category or better by 2 NRSRO's, 5-year
maturity limit; 30% total portfolio limit, 5% issuer limit
Compliant X.C.4 Portfolio Duration
Limitation
Average portfolio duration will be managed to be approximatly equal
to the Market Benchmark selected by the City (typically +/- 20 of
benchmark duration)
Compliant
City of San Jacinto Portfolio Compliance September 1, 2019 to September 30, 2019
Page 10
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Additional Disclosure
This statement is for general information purposes only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations. P lease review the contents of this
statement carefully. Should you have any questions regarding the information presented, calculation methodology, investment portfolio or security detail, or any
other facet of your statement, please feel free to contact us.
Public Trust Advisor’s monthly statement is intended to detail our investment advisory activity as well as the activity of an y accounts held by clients in pools that
are managed by Public Trust Advisors. The custodian bank maintains the control of assets and executes and settles all investm ents transactions. The custodian
statement is the official record of security and cash holdings transactions. Public Trust Advisors recognizes that clients ma y use these reports to facilitate record
keeping; therefore the custodian bank statement and the Public Trust Advisors statement should be reconciled and differences resolved. Many custodians use a
settlement date basis which may result in the need to reconcile due to a timing difference. Please contact your relationshi p manager or our toll free number 855-
395-3954 with questions regarding your account.
Public Trust Advisors does not have the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit funds to the custodian. Our clients retai n responsibility for their internal
accounting policies; implementing and enforcing internal controls and generating ledger entries or otherwise recording transa ctions.
Pricing sources from our reporting platform are provided by Clearwater reporting platform and are established by Clearwater’s internal pricing procedures.
Clearwater utilizes a hierarchical pricing model which starts with one of the industry’s pricing sources, S&P Capital IQ. Se curities with short maturities and
infrequent secondary market trades are typically priced via mathematical calculations. The Securities in this investment por tfolio, including shares of mutual
funds, are not guaranteed or otherwise protected by Public trust Advisors, the FDIC (except for certain non -negotiable certificates of deposit) or any government
agency, unless otherwise specifically stated. Investment in fixed income securities involves risks, including the possible lo ss of the amount invested.
Past performance is not an indication of future performance.
Beginning and Ending Balances based on Market Value plus Accrued Interest on a Trade Date basis.
Public Trust Advisors is an investment advisor registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and is required to mai ntain a written disclosure statement
of our background and business experience. If you would like to receive a copy of our current disclosure statement, privacy p olicy, or code of ethics please contact
Service Operations at the address below.
Public Trust Advisors
717 17th Street, Suite 1850
Denver, CO 80202
Page 11
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Portfolio Holdings
Portfolio Income
Portfolio Transactions
Issuer Concentration
Security Concentration
Portfolio Activity Summary
City of San Jacinto Detail
Page 12
3.A.3.a
Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Month End Report Trade Date copySan Jacinto, City of (66779)Month End (M9 Y2019)09/01/2019 - 09/30/2019Dated: 10/07/2019Locked Down3.A.3.aPacket Pg. 62Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Holdings Report Trade Date (San Jacinto, City of (66779))1Income Detail Report Trade Date (San Jacinto, City of (66779))4Transactions Realized Gain Loss Report (San Jacinto, City of (66779))6Issuer Concentration with Yield GASB 40 Trade Date (San Jacinto, City of(66779))7Security Type GASB 40 Trade Date (San Jacinto, City of (66779))12Portfolio Activity Summary (San Jacinto, City of (66779))16Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/2019203.A.3.aPacket Pg. 63Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Description,Identifier,Security Type,CouponEffective Maturity,Final Maturity,Callable,Next Call DateOriginal Cost,Current Units,Market PriceTrade Date,Settle DateMoodysRating,S&P Rating,Fitch RatingBook Value,Book Value + AccruedAccrued Balance,Net Unrealized Gain/LossMarket Value,Market Value + AccruedCCCIT 16A1 A117305EFW0ABS1.75011/19/201911/19/2019Y---197,429.69200,000.0099.950009/20/201809/24/2018AaaAAA---199,700.66200,983.991,283.33199.32199,899.98201,183.31FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP3137EAEL9AGCY BOND2.37502/16/202102/16/2021N---521,808.00525,000.00100.808504/17/201804/19/2018AaaAA+---523,422.50524,981.091,558.595,822.16529,244.66530,803.25FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION3135G0U92AGCY BOND2.62501/11/202201/11/2022N---129,906.40130,000.00102.136201/09/201901/11/2019AaaAA+---129,928.31130,686.64758.332,848.73132,777.04133,535.37INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP459200JN2CORP1.90001/27/202001/27/2020N---299,712.00300,000.0099.930601/24/201701/27/2017A2A---299,968.47300,981.811,013.33-176.65299,791.82300,805.15MICROSOFT CORP594918BV5CORP1.85002/06/202002/06/2020N---149,899.50150,000.0099.952301/30/201702/06/2017AaaAAA---149,988.07150,412.03423.96-59.64149,928.44150,352.40WALT DISNEY CO25468PDP8CORP1.95003/04/202003/04/2020N---298,956.00300,000.0099.953403/15/201703/20/2017A2A---299,845.89300,284.64438.7514.37299,860.26300,299.01APPLE INC037833CS7CORP1.80005/11/202005/11/2020N---124,872.50125,000.0099.933905/04/201705/11/2017Aa1AA+---124,973.46125,848.46875.00-56.03124,917.43125,792.43INTEL CORP458140AZ3CORP1.85005/11/202005/11/2020N---249,905.00250,000.0099.928105/08/201705/11/2017A1A+---249,980.22251,778.831,798.61-160.06249,820.16251,618.77WAL-MART STORES INC931142DY6CORP1.75010/09/201910/09/2019N---44,999.1045,000.0099.990010/11/201710/20/2017Aa2AA---44,999.9945,376.24376.25-4.4944,995.5045,371.75AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP02665WCH2CORP3.00006/16/202006/16/2020N---74,898.7575,000.00100.645407/11/201807/16/2018A2A---74,961.5375,617.78656.25522.5275,484.0576,140.30AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP02665WCP4CORP3.37512/10/202112/10/2021N---174,916.00175,000.00102.803610/03/201810/10/2018A2A---174,937.10176,758.191,821.094,969.19179,906.29181,727.38EXXON MOBIL CORP30231GBB7CORP1.90208/16/202208/16/2022N---75,000.0075,000.00100.435308/13/201908/16/2019AaaAA+---75,000.0075,178.31178.31326.5175,326.5175,504.82FHMS K024 A23137AXHP1FHLMC CMO2.57308/20/202209/25/2022Y---319,687.50320,000.00101.624205/02/201905/07/2019AaaAA+---319,660.18320,346.31686.135,537.36325,197.54325,883.67FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y31846V203MMFUND1.52009/30/201909/30/2019N---106,765.78106,765.781.0000------AaaAAAm---106,765.78106,765.780.000.00106,765.78106,765.78UNITED STATES TREASURY9128284B3US GOV2.37503/15/202103/15/2021N---339,455.47340,000.00100.890603/26/201803/28/2018AaaAA+---339,728.53340,083.48354.953,299.51343,028.04343,382.99UNITED STATES TREASURY9128283X6US GOV2.25002/15/202102/15/2021N---325,952.35330,000.00100.652307/26/201807/30/2018AaaAA+---327,784.01328,732.31948.304,368.58332,152.59333,100.89Holdings Report Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 09/30/2019Return to Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/201913.A.3.aPacket Pg. 64Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Description,Identifier,Security Type,CouponEffective Maturity,Final Maturity,Callable,Next Call DateOriginal Cost,Current Units,Market PriceTrade Date,Settle DateMoodysRating,S&P Rating,Fitch RatingBook Value,Book Value + AccruedAccrued Balance,Net Unrealized Gain/LossMarket Value,Market Value + AccruedUNITED STATES TREASURY9128284P2US GOV2.62505/15/202105/15/2021N---328,723.83330,000.00101.441407/26/201807/30/2018AaaAA+---329,251.51332,523.493,271.985,505.11334,756.62338,028.60UNITED STATES TREASURY9128285A4US GOV2.75009/15/202109/15/2021N---298,722.65300,000.00102.136709/24/201809/26/2018AaaAA+---299,147.66299,510.30362.647,262.44306,410.10306,772.74UNITED STATES TREASURY912828Y20US GOV2.62507/15/202107/15/2021N---436,803.13440,000.00101.625009/24/201809/26/2018AaaAA+---437,937.51440,385.612,448.109,212.49447,150.00449,598.10UNITED STATES TREASURY912828F21US GOV2.12509/30/202109/30/2021N---428,491.99435,000.00100.918012/17/201812/20/2018AaaAA+---430,277.24430,302.4925.268,716.06438,993.30439,018.56UNITED STATES TREASURY9128285L0US GOV2.87511/15/202111/15/2021N---437,090.04435,000.00102.539112/17/201812/20/2018AaaAA+---436,548.09441,271.924,723.839,497.00446,045.09450,768.91UNITED STATES TREASURY9128285R7US GOV2.62512/15/202112/15/2021N---250,664.06250,000.00102.203101/10/201901/15/2019AaaAA+---250,508.83252,445.311,936.484,998.92255,507.75257,444.23UNITED STATES TREASURY912828WY2US GOV2.25007/31/202107/31/2021N---436,940.63440,000.00101.011701/10/201901/15/2019AaaAA+---437,779.98439,447.911,667.936,671.50444,451.48446,119.41UNITED STATES TREASURY912828D72US GOV2.00008/31/202108/31/2021N---246,748.05250,000.00100.617202/13/201902/15/2019AaaAA+---247,526.77247,952.59425.824,016.23251,543.00251,968.82UNITED STATES TREASURY912828W55US GOV1.87502/28/202202/28/2022N---98,101.56100,000.00100.585902/13/201902/15/2019AaaAA+---98,478.8398,638.51159.682,107.07100,585.90100,745.58UNITED STATES TREASURY912828XG0US GOV2.12506/30/202206/30/2022N---148,089.85150,000.00101.449202/13/201902/15/2019AaaAA+---148,434.06149,239.60805.543,739.74152,173.80152,979.34UNITED STATES TREASURY912828G87US GOV2.12512/31/202112/31/2021N---284,242.97285,000.00101.089803/26/201903/28/2019AaaAA+---284,383.66285,914.181,530.523,722.27288,105.93289,636.45UNITED STATES TREASURY9128286H8US GOV2.37503/15/202203/15/2022N---286,425.00285,000.00101.906203/26/201903/28/2019AaaAA+---286,187.95286,485.48297.534,244.72290,432.67290,730.20UNITED STATES TREASURY912828SF8US GOV2.00002/15/202202/15/2022N---314,778.52315,000.00100.918005/29/201905/31/2019AaaAA+---314,808.90315,613.52804.623,082.80317,891.70318,696.32UNITED STATES TREASURY912828V72US GOV1.87501/31/202201/31/2022N---313,621.88315,000.00100.554705/29/201905/31/2019AaaAA+---313,795.04314,790.12995.072,952.26316,747.30317,742.38UNITED STATES TREASURY912828B90US GOV2.00002/28/202102/28/2021N---314,310.94315,000.00100.351605/29/201905/31/2019AaaAA+---314,444.47314,981.01536.541,663.07316,107.54316,644.08UNITED STATES TREASURY912828WG1US GOV2.25004/30/202104/30/2021N---315,922.85315,000.00100.800805/29/201905/31/2019AaaAA+---315,765.98318,731.942,965.961,756.54317,522.52320,488.48Holdings Report Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 09/30/2019Return to Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/201923.A.3.aPacket Pg. 65Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
* Filtered By: Description ¹ "Payable" and Description ¹ "Receivable". * Weighted by: Market Value + Accrued.Description,Identifier,Security Type,CouponEffective Maturity,Final Maturity,Callable,Next Call DateOriginal Cost,Current Units,Market PriceTrade Date,Settle DateMoodysRating,S&P Rating,Fitch RatingBook Value,Book Value + AccruedAccrued Balance,Net Unrealized Gain/LossMarket Value,Market Value + AccruedUNITED STATES TREASURY912828C57US GOV2.25003/31/202103/31/2021N---315,762.89315,000.00100.734405/29/201905/31/2019AaaAA+---315,628.62315,647.9919.361,684.74317,313.36317,332.72UNITED STATES TREASURY912828L57US GOV1.75009/30/202209/30/2022N---374,765.63375,000.00100.496106/26/201906/27/2019AaaAA+---374,787.32374,805.2517.932,073.05376,860.38376,878.31UNITED STATES TREASURY912828J76US GOV1.75003/31/202203/31/2022N---473,348.63475,000.00100.382807/09/201907/11/2019AaaAA+---473,485.85473,508.5622.713,332.45476,818.30476,841.01UNITED STATES TREASURY912828L24US GOV1.87508/31/202208/31/2022N---100,953.13100,000.00100.839808/08/201908/09/2019AaaAA+---100,909.27101,068.96159.68-69.47100,839.80100,999.48UNITED STATES TREASURY912828P38US GOV1.75001/31/202301/31/2023N---439,570.90435,000.00100.527308/26/201908/28/2019AaaAA+---439,450.52440,733.061,282.54-2,156.77437,293.76438,576.30UNITED STATES TREASURY912828N30US GOV2.12512/31/202212/31/2022N---447,528.13440,000.00101.707009/10/201909/12/2019AaaAA+---447,413.79449,776.702,362.9197.01447,510.80449,873.71UNITED STATES TREASURY912828L24US GOV1.87508/31/202208/31/2022N---125,668.95125,000.00100.839809/17/201909/18/2019AaaAA+---125,661.05125,860.66199.61388.70126,049.75126,249.36------------08/29/202108/30/2021------10,651,440.2510,671,765.78---------Aa1AA---10,664,257.6110,704,451.0540,193.44111,949.3110,776,206.9210,816,400.36Holdings Report Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 09/30/2019Return to Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/201933.A.3.aPacket Pg. 66Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Identifier,DescriptionFinal MaturityEnding Current UnitsEarned InterestIncomeRealized Gain,Realized LossAccretion IncomeAmortization ExpenseMisc IncomeNet Earned IncomeInterest PaymentReceived,Ending Interest Due912828P38UNITED STATES TREASURY01/31/2023435,000.00620.580.000.000.00-106.220.00514.370.000.00912828N30UNITED STATES TREASURY12/31/2022440,000.00482.750.000.000.00-114.340.00368.410.000.00912828L57UNITED STATES TREASURY09/30/2022375,000.00537.910.000.006.750.000.00544.663,281.250.003137AXHP1FHMS K024 A209/25/2022320,000.00686.130.000.00-4.730.000.00681.40686.130.00912828L24UNITED STATES TREASURY08/31/2022100,000.00154.530.000.000.00-25.200.00129.33937.500.00912828L24UNITED STATES TREASURY08/31/2022125,000.0083.710.000.000.00-7.900.0075.810.000.0030231GBB7EXXON MOBIL CORP08/16/202275,000.00118.880.000.000.000.000.00118.880.000.00912828XG0UNITED STATES TREASURY06/30/2022150,000.00259.850.000.0044.900.000.00304.750.000.00912828J76UNITED STATES TREASURY03/31/2022475,000.00681.350.000.0050.170.000.00731.534,156.250.009128286H8UNITED STATES TREASURY03/15/2022285,000.00555.040.000.000.00-38.500.00516.543,384.380.00912828W55UNITED STATES TREASURY02/28/2022100,000.00154.530.000.0050.580.000.00205.11937.500.00912828SF8UNITED STATES TREASURY02/15/2022315,000.00513.590.000.006.430.000.00520.020.000.00912828V72UNITED STATES TREASURY01/31/2022315,000.00481.490.000.0041.220.000.00522.710.000.003135G0U92FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION01/11/2022130,000.00284.380.000.002.490.000.00286.870.000.00912828G87UNITED STATES TREASURY12/31/2021285,000.00493.720.000.0021.810.000.00515.530.000.009128285R7UNITED STATES TREASURY12/15/2021250,000.00537.910.000.000.00-18.380.00519.530.000.0002665WCP4AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP12/10/2021175,000.00492.190.000.002.260.000.00494.450.000.009128285L0UNITED STATES TREASURY11/15/2021435,000.001,019.530.000.000.00-57.610.00961.920.000.00912828F21UNITED STATES TREASURY09/30/2021435,000.00757.690.000.00187.520.000.00945.214,621.880.009128285A4UNITED STATES TREASURY09/15/2021300,000.00676.500.000.0034.710.000.00711.214,125.000.00912828D72UNITED STATES TREASURY08/31/2021250,000.00412.090.000.00104.360.000.00516.452,500.000.00912828WY2UNITED STATES TREASURY07/31/2021440,000.00807.070.000.0096.790.000.00903.850.000.00912828Y20UNITED STATES TREASURY07/15/2021440,000.00941.580.000.0091.780.000.001,033.360.000.009128284T4UNITED STATES TREASURY06/15/20210.00347.136,139.180.000.00-11.460.006,474.860.000.009128284P2UNITED STATES TREASURY05/15/2021330,000.00706.180.000.0036.660.000.00742.850.000.00912828WG1UNITED STATES TREASURY04/30/2021315,000.00577.790.000.000.00-38.260.00539.520.000.00912828C57UNITED STATES TREASURY03/31/2021315,000.00580.940.000.000.00-32.780.00548.163,543.750.009128284B3UNITED STATES TREASURY03/15/2021340,000.00662.150.000.0015.010.000.00677.164,037.500.00912828B90UNITED STATES TREASURY02/28/2021315,000.00519.230.000.0032.000.000.00551.233,150.000.003137EAEL9FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP02/16/2021525,000.001,039.060.000.0092.210.000.001,131.280.000.00Income Detail Report Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)09/01/2019 - 09/30/2019Return to Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/201943.A.3.aPacket Pg. 67Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
* Filtered By: Description ¹ "Payable" and Description ¹ "Receivable". * Weighted by: Ending Market Value + Accrued.Identifier,DescriptionFinal MaturityEnding Current UnitsEarned InterestIncomeRealized Gain,Realized LossAccretion IncomeAmortization ExpenseMisc IncomeNet Earned IncomeInterest PaymentReceived,Ending Interest Due9128283X6UNITED STATES TREASURY02/15/2021330,000.00605.300.000.00129.680.000.00734.980.000.0002665WCH2AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP06/16/202075,000.00187.500.000.004.410.000.00191.910.000.00037833CS7APPLE INC05/11/2020125,000.00187.500.000.003.510.000.00191.010.000.00458140AZ3INTEL CORP05/11/2020250,000.00385.420.000.002.620.000.00388.030.000.0025468PDP8WALT DISNEY CO03/04/2020300,000.00487.500.000.0029.770.000.00517.272,925.000.00594918BV5MICROSOFT CORP02/06/2020150,000.00231.250.000.002.790.000.00234.040.000.00459200JN2INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP01/27/2020300,000.00475.000.000.008.020.000.00483.020.000.0017305EFW0CCCIT 16A1 A111/19/2019200,000.00291.670.000.00183.270.000.00474.940.000.00931142DY6WAL-MART STORES INC10/09/201945,000.0065.630.000.000.040.000.0065.670.000.0031846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y09/30/2019106,765.78108.110.000.000.000.000.00108.1133.47108.11375558BR3GILEAD SCIENCES INC09/20/20190.0053.700.000.000.500.000.0054.21508.750.00037833CZ1APPLE INC09/12/20190.0055.000.000.001.560.000.0056.56900.000.00------08/30/202110,671,765.7819,319.026,139.180.001,279.12-450.640.0026,286.6939,728.36108.11Income Detail Report Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)09/01/2019 - 09/30/2019Return to Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/201953.A.3.aPacket Pg. 68Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
* Does not Lock Down. * Filtered By: Type = Buy or Type = Sell or Type = Call Redemption or Type = Put Redemption or Type = Corporate Action Sell or Type = Cash Transfer or Type = Maturity or Type = Coupon or Type = Principal Paydown or Type = Money Market Funds. * Weighted by: AbsoluteValue of Principal. * MMF transactions are expanded. * The Transaction Detail/Trading Activity reports provide our most up-to-date transactional details. As such, these reports are subject to change even after the other reports on the website have been locked down. While these reports can be useful tools in understanding recent activity,due to their dynamic nature we do not recommend using them for booking journal entries or reconciliation.IdentifierDescriptionCurrent UnitsTypeSettle DatePricePrincipalRealized Gain/LossAmount31846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y0.00Money Market Funds08/31/2019---0.000.0033.47912828B90UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00Coupon08/31/2019---0.000.003,150.00912828D72UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00Coupon08/31/2019---0.000.002,500.00912828L24UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00Coupon08/31/2019---0.000.00937.50912828W55UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00Coupon08/31/2019---0.000.00937.503137AXHP1FHMS K024 A20.00Coupon09/01/2019---0.000.00686.1331846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y7,525.00Buy09/03/20191.0007,525.000.00-7,525.0031846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y2,958.47Buy09/04/20191.0002,958.470.00-2,958.4725468PDP8WALT DISNEY CO0.00Coupon09/04/2019---0.000.002,925.0031846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y121,123.76Buy09/12/20191.000121,123.760.00-121,123.76037833CZ1APPLE INC0.00Coupon09/12/2019---0.000.00900.00037833CZ1APPLE INC-120,000.00Maturity09/12/2019100.000-120,000.000.00120,000.009128284T4UNITED STATES TREASURY-440,000.00Sell09/12/2019101.551-446,823.446,139.18449,632.05912828N30UNITED STATES TREASURY440,000.00Buy09/12/2019101.711447,528.130.00-449,408.299128284B3UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00Coupon09/15/2019---0.000.004,037.509128285A4UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00Coupon09/15/2019---0.000.004,125.009128286H8UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00Coupon09/15/2019---0.000.003,384.3831846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y11,546.88Buy09/16/20191.00011,546.880.00-11,546.8831846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y-125,784.85Sell09/18/20191.000-125,784.850.00125,784.85912828L24UNITED STATES TREASURY125,000.00Buy09/18/2019100.535125,668.950.00-125,784.8531846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y55,508.75Buy09/20/20191.00055,508.750.00-55,508.75375558BR3GILEAD SCIENCES INC0.00Coupon09/20/2019---0.000.00508.75375558BR3GILEAD SCIENCES INC-55,000.00Maturity09/20/2019100.000-55,000.000.0055,000.00CCYUSDUS DOLLAR0.00Cash Transfer09/25/2019---0.000.00-104.1731846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y686.13Buy09/25/20191.000686.130.00-686.1331846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y-104.17Sell09/25/20191.000-104.170.00104.1731846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y15,603.13Buy09/30/20191.00015,603.130.00-15,603.1331846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG Y0.00Money Market Funds09/30/2019---0.000.00108.11912828C57UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00Coupon09/30/2019---0.000.003,543.75912828F21UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00Coupon09/30/2019---0.000.004,621.88912828J76UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00Coupon09/30/2019---0.000.004,156.25912828L57UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00Coupon09/30/2019---0.000.003,281.25------39,063.10---------40,436.746,139.18108.11Transactions Realized Gain Loss ReportSan Jacinto, City of (66779)09/01/2019 - 09/30/2019Return to Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/201963.A.3.aPacket Pg. 69Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Apple Inc.Citigroup Inc.Exxon Mobil CorporationIdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue037833CS7CORPAPPLE INCApple Inc.125,000.00FixedN0.6041.8351.90805/11/202005/11/2020875.00124,973.46125,848.46124,917.43125,792.431.159%037833CS7CORPAPPLE INCApple Inc.125,000.00FixedN0.6041.8351.90805/11/202005/11/2020875.00124,973.46125,848.46124,917.43125,792.431.159%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue17305EFW0ABSCCCIT 16A1 A1Citigroup Inc.200,000.00FixedY0.1352.8732.11311/19/201911/19/20191,283.33199,700.66200,983.99199,899.98201,183.311.855%17305EFW0ABSCCCIT 16A1 A1Citigroup Inc.200,000.00FixedY0.1352.8732.11311/19/201911/19/20191,283.33199,700.66200,983.99199,899.98201,183.311.855%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue30231GBB7CORPEXXON MOBIL CORPExxon Mobil Corporation75,000.00FixedN2.7841.9021.74608/16/202208/16/2022178.3175,000.0075,178.3175,326.5175,504.820.699%Issuer Concentration with Yield GASB 40 Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 09/30/2019Return to Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/201973.A.3.aPacket Pg. 70Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Federal National Mortgage AssociationFreddie MacHonda Motor Co., Ltd.Intel CorporationInternational Business Machines CorporationIdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue30231GBB7CORPEXXON MOBIL CORPExxon Mobil Corporation75,000.00FixedN2.7841.9021.74608/16/202208/16/2022178.3175,000.0075,178.3175,326.5175,504.820.699%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue3135G0U92AGCY BONDFEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATIONFederal National Mortgage Association130,000.00FixedN2.1992.6501.66601/11/202201/11/2022758.33129,928.31130,686.64132,777.04133,535.371.232%3135G0U92AGCY BONDFEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATIONFederal National Mortgage Association130,000.00FixedN2.1992.6501.66601/11/202201/11/2022758.33129,928.31130,686.64132,777.04133,535.371.232%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue3137AXHP1FHLMC CMOFHMS K024 A2Freddie Mac320,000.00FixedY2.7582.5631.94108/20/202209/25/2022686.13319,660.18320,346.31325,197.54325,883.673.018%3137EAEL9AGCY BONDFEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGECORPFreddie Mac525,000.00FixedN1.3482.5991.77802/16/202102/16/20211,558.59523,422.50524,981.09529,244.66530,803.254.911%---------Freddie Mac845,000.00Fixed---1.8852.5851.84009/13/202109/27/20212,244.73843,082.68845,327.41854,442.19856,686.927.929%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue02665WCH2CORPAMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPHonda Motor Co., Ltd.75,000.00FixedN0.6973.0742.07806/16/202006/16/2020656.2574,961.5375,617.7875,484.0576,140.300.700%02665WCP4CORPAMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPHonda Motor Co., Ltd.175,000.00FixedN2.0933.3922.06112/10/202112/10/20211,821.09174,937.10176,758.19179,906.29181,727.381.669%---CORPAMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPHonda Motor Co., Ltd.250,000.00FixedN1.6803.2972.06607/03/202107/03/20212,477.34249,898.63252,375.98255,390.34257,867.692.370%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue458140AZ3CORPINTEL CORPIntel Corporation250,000.00FixedN0.6031.8631.96705/11/202005/11/20201,798.61249,980.22251,778.83249,820.16251,618.772.318%458140AZ3CORPINTEL CORPIntel Corporation250,000.00FixedN0.6031.8631.96705/11/202005/11/20201,798.61249,980.22251,778.83249,820.16251,618.772.318%Issuer Concentration with Yield GASB 40 Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 09/30/2019Return to Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/201983.A.3.aPacket Pg. 71Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Microsoft CorporationThe Walt Disney CompanyU.S. BancorpUnited StatesIdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue459200JN2CORPINTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINESCORPInternational Business Machines Corporation300,000.00FixedN0.3231.9332.10801/27/202001/27/20201,013.33299,968.47300,981.81299,791.82300,805.152.782%459200JN2CORPINTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINESCORPInternational Business MachinesCorporation300,000.00FixedN0.3231.9332.10801/27/202001/27/20201,013.33299,968.47300,981.81299,791.82300,805.152.782%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue594918BV5CORPMICROSOFT CORPMicrosoft Corporation150,000.00FixedN0.3481.8731.98202/06/202002/06/2020423.96149,988.07150,412.03149,928.44150,352.401.391%594918BV5CORPMICROSOFT CORPMicrosoft Corporation150,000.00FixedN0.3481.8731.98202/06/202002/06/2020423.96149,988.07150,412.03149,928.44150,352.401.391%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue25468PDP8CORPWALT DISNEY COThe Walt Disney Company300,000.00FixedN0.4242.0722.05703/04/202003/04/2020438.75299,845.89300,284.64299,860.26300,299.012.783%25468PDP8CORPWALT DISNEY COThe Walt Disney Company300,000.00FixedN0.4242.0722.05703/04/202003/04/2020438.75299,845.89300,284.64299,860.26300,299.012.783%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue31846V203MMFUNDFIRST AMER:GVT OBLG YU.S. Bancorp106,765.78FixedN0.0001.5201.52009/30/201909/30/20190.00106,765.78106,765.78106,765.78106,765.780.991%31846V203MMFUNDFIRST AMER:GVT OBLG YU.S. Bancorp106,765.78FixedN0.0001.5201.52009/30/201909/30/20190.00106,765.78106,765.78106,765.78106,765.780.991%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue9128284B3US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States340,000.00FixedN1.4292.4311.75403/15/202103/15/2021354.95339,728.53340,083.48343,028.04343,382.993.183%9128283X6US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States330,000.00FixedN1.3472.7521.76702/15/202102/15/2021948.30327,784.01328,732.31332,152.59333,100.893.082%9128284P2US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States330,000.00FixedN1.5732.7691.72105/15/202105/15/20213,271.98329,251.51332,523.49334,756.62338,028.603.106%9128285A4US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States300,000.00FixedN1.9032.9001.63709/15/202109/15/2021362.64299,147.66299,510.30306,410.10306,772.742.843%912828Y20US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States440,000.00FixedN1.7382.8961.69907/15/202107/15/20212,448.10437,937.51440,385.61447,150.00449,598.104.149%912828F21US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States435,000.00FixedN1.9532.6871.65609/30/202109/30/202125.26430,277.24430,302.49438,993.30439,018.564.074%Issuer Concentration with Yield GASB 40 Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 09/30/2019Return to Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/201993.A.3.aPacket Pg. 72Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Walmart Inc.SummaryIdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue9128285L0US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States435,000.00FixedN2.0392.7011.65411/15/202111/15/20214,723.83436,548.09441,271.92446,045.09450,768.914.139%9128285R7US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States250,000.00FixedN2.1282.5291.60512/15/202112/15/20211,936.48250,508.83252,445.31255,507.75257,444.232.371%912828WY2US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States440,000.00FixedN1.7862.5341.68707/31/202107/31/20211,667.93437,779.98439,447.91444,451.48446,119.414.124%912828D72US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States250,000.00FixedN1.8732.5331.67108/31/202108/31/2021425.82247,526.77247,952.59251,543.00251,968.822.334%912828W55US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States100,000.00FixedN2.3532.5281.62702/28/202202/28/2022159.6898,478.8398,638.51100,585.90100,745.580.933%912828XG0US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States150,000.00FixedN2.6522.5211.58406/30/202206/30/2022805.54148,434.06149,239.60152,173.80152,979.341.412%912828G87US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States285,000.00FixedN2.1812.2241.62912/31/202112/31/20211,530.52284,383.66285,914.18288,105.93289,636.452.674%9128286H8US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States285,000.00FixedN2.3832.2001.58103/15/202203/15/2022297.53286,187.95286,485.48290,432.67290,730.202.695%912828SF8US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States315,000.00FixedN2.3082.0261.60402/15/202202/15/2022804.62314,808.90315,613.52317,891.70318,696.322.950%912828V72US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States315,000.00FixedN2.2702.0441.63101/31/202201/31/2022995.07313,795.04314,790.12316,747.30317,742.382.939%912828B90US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States315,000.00FixedN1.3912.1271.74702/28/202102/28/2021536.54314,444.47314,981.01316,107.54316,644.082.933%912828WG1US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States315,000.00FixedN1.5382.0931.73504/30/202104/30/20212,965.96315,765.98318,731.94317,522.52320,488.482.947%912828C57US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States315,000.00FixedN1.4712.1141.75203/31/202103/31/202119.36315,628.62315,647.99317,313.36317,332.722.945%912828L57US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States375,000.00FixedN2.9131.7701.58009/30/202209/30/202217.93374,787.32374,805.25376,860.38376,878.313.497%912828J76US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States475,000.00FixedN2.4381.8811.59303/31/202203/31/202222.71473,485.85473,508.56476,818.30476,841.014.425%912828L24US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States100,000.00FixedN2.8271.5551.57908/31/202208/31/2022159.68100,909.27101,068.96100,839.80100,999.480.936%912828P38US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States435,000.00FixedN3.2191.4341.58701/31/202301/31/20231,282.54439,450.52440,733.06437,293.76438,576.304.058%912828N30US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States440,000.00FixedN3.1181.5901.58412/31/202212/31/20222,362.91447,413.79449,776.70447,510.80449,873.714.153%912828L24US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States125,000.00FixedN2.8271.6881.57908/31/202208/31/2022199.61125,661.05125,860.66126,049.75126,249.361.170%---US GOVUNITED STATES TREASURYUnited States7,895,000.00FixedN2.1182.2701.65412/06/202112/06/202128,325.497,890,125.457,918,450.947,982,291.478,010,616.9674.073%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue931142DY6CORPWAL-MART STORES INCWalmart Inc.45,000.00FixedN0.0251.7512.13210/09/201910/09/2019376.2544,999.9945,376.2444,995.5045,371.750.418%931142DY6CORPWAL-MART STORES INCWalmart Inc.45,000.00FixedN0.0251.7512.13210/09/201910/09/2019376.2544,999.9945,376.2444,995.5045,371.750.418%IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValueIssuer Concentration with Yield GASB 40 Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 09/30/2019Return to Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/2019103.A.3.aPacket Pg. 73Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
* Grouped by: Issuer Concentration. * Groups Sorted by: Issuer Concentration. * Filtered By: Description ¹ "Payable" and Description ¹ "Receivable". * Weighted by: Ending Market Value + Accrued, except Book Yield by Base Book Value + Accrued.IdentifierSecurity TypeDescription,Issuer ConcentrationEnding Current UnitsCoupon TypeCallableDurationBookYieldYieldEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityEnding AccruedBalanceEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued% of MarketValue------------10,671,765.78Fixed---1.8542.2881.72708/29/202108/30/202140,193.4410,664,257.6110,704,451.0510,776,206.9210,816,400.36100.000%Issuer Concentration with Yield GASB 40 Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 09/30/2019Return to Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/2019113.A.3.aPacket Pg. 74Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
ABSAGCY BONDIdentifier,Description,Security Type% of MarketValue +AccruedCoupon TypeCallableDurationS&PRating,Moody'sRatingEnding Current UnitsEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityBookYield,YieldEnding AccruedBalanceOriginal CostEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued17305EFW0CCCIT 16A1 A1ABS1.860%FixedY0.135AAAAaa200,000.0011/19/201911/19/20192.8732.1131,283.33197,429.69199,700.66200,983.99199,899.98201,183.3117305EFW0CCCIT 16A1 A1ABS1.860%FixedY0.135AAAAaa200,000.0011/19/201911/19/20192.8732.1131,283.33197,429.69199,700.66200,983.99199,899.98201,183.31Identifier,Description,Security Type% of MarketValue +AccruedCoupon TypeCallableDurationS&PRating,Moody'sRatingEnding Current UnitsEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityBookYield,YieldEnding AccruedBalanceOriginal CostEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued3137EAEL9FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPAGCY BOND4.907%FixedN1.348AA+Aaa525,000.0002/16/202102/16/20212.5991.7781,558.59521,808.00523,422.50524,981.09529,244.66530,803.253135G0U92FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATIONAGCY BOND1.235%FixedN2.199AA+Aaa130,000.0001/11/202201/11/20222.6501.666758.33129,906.40129,928.31130,686.64132,777.04133,535.37------AGCY BOND6.142%FixedN1.519AA+Aaa655,000.0004/23/202104/23/20212.6091.7552,316.93651,714.40653,350.81655,667.73662,021.70664,338.62Security Type GASB 40 Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 09/30/2019Return to Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/2019123.A.3.aPacket Pg. 75Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
CORPFHLMC CMOMMFUNDIdentifier,Description,Security Type% of MarketValue +AccruedCoupon TypeCallableDurationS&PRating,Moody'sRatingEnding Current UnitsEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityBookYield,YieldEnding AccruedBalanceOriginal CostEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued931142DY6WAL-MART STORES INCCORP0.419%FixedN0.025AAAa245,000.0010/09/201910/09/20191.7512.132376.2544,999.1044,999.9945,376.2444,995.5045,371.75459200JN2INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINESCORPCORP2.781%FixedN0.323AA2300,000.0001/27/202001/27/20201.9332.1081,013.33299,712.00299,968.47300,981.81299,791.82300,805.15594918BV5MICROSOFT CORPCORP1.390%FixedN0.348AAAAaa150,000.0002/06/202002/06/20201.8731.982423.96149,899.50149,988.07150,412.03149,928.44150,352.4025468PDP8WALT DISNEY COCORP2.776%FixedN0.424AA2300,000.0003/04/202003/04/20202.0722.057438.75298,956.00299,845.89300,284.64299,860.26300,299.01037833CS7APPLE INCCORP1.163%FixedN0.604AA+Aa1125,000.0005/11/202005/11/20201.8351.908875.00124,872.50124,973.46125,848.46124,917.43125,792.43458140AZ3INTEL CORPCORP2.326%FixedN0.603A+A1250,000.0005/11/202005/11/20201.8631.9671,798.61249,905.00249,980.22251,778.83249,820.16251,618.7702665WCH2AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPCORP0.704%FixedN0.697AA275,000.0006/16/202006/16/20203.0742.078656.2574,898.7574,961.5375,617.7875,484.0576,140.3002665WCP4AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPCORP1.680%FixedN2.093AA2175,000.0012/10/202112/10/20213.3922.0611,821.09174,916.00174,937.10176,758.19179,906.29181,727.3830231GBB7EXXON MOBIL CORPCORP0.698%FixedN2.784AA+Aaa75,000.0008/16/202208/16/20221.9021.746178.3175,000.0075,000.0075,178.3175,326.5175,504.82------CORP13.938%FixedN0.762A+A11,495,000.0007/12/202007/12/20202.1572.0207,581.561,493,158.851,494,654.741,502,236.301,500,030.461,507,612.02Identifier,Description,Security Type% of MarketValue +AccruedCoupon TypeCallableDurationS&PRating,Moody'sRatingEnding Current UnitsEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityBookYield,YieldEnding AccruedBalanceOriginal CostEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued3137AXHP1FHMS K024 A2FHLMC CMO3.013%FixedY2.758AA+Aaa320,000.0008/20/202209/25/20222.5631.941686.13319,687.50319,660.18320,346.31325,197.54325,883.673137AXHP1FHMS K024 A2FHLMC CMO3.013%FixedY2.758AA+Aaa320,000.0008/20/202209/25/20222.5631.941686.13319,687.50319,660.18320,346.31325,197.54325,883.67Identifier,Description,Security Type% of MarketValue +AccruedCoupon TypeCallableDurationS&PRating,Moody'sRatingEnding Current UnitsEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityBookYield,YieldEnding AccruedBalanceOriginal CostEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued31846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG YMMFUND0.987%FixedN0.000AAAmAaa106,765.7809/30/201909/30/20191.5201.5200.00106,765.78106,765.78106,765.78106,765.78106,765.7831846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG YMMFUND0.987%FixedN0.000AAAmAaa106,765.7809/30/201909/30/20191.5201.5200.00106,765.78106,765.78106,765.78106,765.78106,765.78Security Type GASB 40 Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 09/30/2019Return to Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/2019133.A.3.aPacket Pg. 76Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
US GOVIdentifier,Description,Security Type% of MarketValue +AccruedCoupon TypeCallableDurationS&PRating,Moody'sRatingEnding Current UnitsEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityBookYield,YieldEnding AccruedBalanceOriginal CostEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued9128283X6UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV3.080%FixedN1.347AA+Aaa330,000.0002/15/202102/15/20212.7521.767948.30325,952.35327,784.01328,732.31332,152.59333,100.89912828B90UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.927%FixedN1.391AA+Aaa315,000.0002/28/202102/28/20212.1271.747536.54314,310.94314,444.47314,981.01316,107.54316,644.089128284B3UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV3.175%FixedN1.429AA+Aaa340,000.0003/15/202103/15/20212.4311.754354.95339,455.47339,728.53340,083.48343,028.04343,382.99912828C57UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.934%FixedN1.471AA+Aaa315,000.0003/31/202103/31/20212.1141.75219.36315,762.89315,628.62315,647.99317,313.36317,332.72912828WG1UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.963%FixedN1.538AA+Aaa315,000.0004/30/202104/30/20212.0931.7352,965.96315,922.85315,765.98318,731.94317,522.52320,488.489128284P2UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV3.125%FixedN1.573AA+Aaa330,000.0005/15/202105/15/20212.7691.7213,271.98328,723.83329,251.51332,523.49334,756.62338,028.60912828Y20UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV4.157%FixedN1.738AA+Aaa440,000.0007/15/202107/15/20212.8961.6992,448.10436,803.13437,937.51440,385.61447,150.00449,598.10912828WY2UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV4.124%FixedN1.786AA+Aaa440,000.0007/31/202107/31/20212.5341.6871,667.93436,940.63437,779.98439,447.91444,451.48446,119.41912828D72UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.330%FixedN1.873AA+Aaa250,000.0008/31/202108/31/20212.5331.671425.82246,748.05247,526.77247,952.59251,543.00251,968.829128285A4UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.836%FixedN1.903AA+Aaa300,000.0009/15/202109/15/20212.9001.637362.64298,722.65299,147.66299,510.30306,410.10306,772.74912828F21UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV4.059%FixedN1.953AA+Aaa435,000.0009/30/202109/30/20212.6871.65625.26428,491.99430,277.24430,302.49438,993.30439,018.569128285L0UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV4.167%FixedN2.039AA+Aaa435,000.0011/15/202111/15/20212.7011.6544,723.83437,090.04436,548.09441,271.92446,045.09450,768.919128285R7UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.380%FixedN2.128AA+Aaa250,000.0012/15/202112/15/20212.5291.6051,936.48250,664.06250,508.83252,445.31255,507.75257,444.23912828G87UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.678%FixedN2.181AA+Aaa285,000.0012/31/202112/31/20212.2241.6291,530.52284,242.97284,383.66285,914.18288,105.93289,636.45912828V72UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.938%FixedN2.270AA+Aaa315,000.0001/31/202201/31/20222.0441.631995.07313,621.88313,795.04314,790.12316,747.30317,742.38912828SF8UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.946%FixedN2.308AA+Aaa315,000.0002/15/202202/15/20222.0261.604804.62314,778.52314,808.90315,613.52317,891.70318,696.32912828W55UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.931%FixedN2.353AA+Aaa100,000.0002/28/202202/28/20222.5281.627159.6898,101.5698,478.8398,638.51100,585.90100,745.589128286H8UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2.688%FixedN2.383AA+Aaa285,000.0003/15/202203/15/20222.2001.581297.53286,425.00286,187.95286,485.48290,432.67290,730.20912828J76UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV4.409%FixedN2.438AA+Aaa475,000.0003/31/202203/31/20221.8811.59322.71473,348.63473,485.85473,508.56476,818.30476,841.01912828XG0UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV1.414%FixedN2.652AA+Aaa150,000.0006/30/202206/30/20222.5211.584805.54148,089.85148,434.06149,239.60152,173.80152,979.34Security Type GASB 40 Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 09/30/2019Return to Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/2019143.A.3.aPacket Pg. 77Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Summary * Grouped by: Security Type. * Groups Sorted by: Security Type. * Filtered By: Description ¹ "Payable" and Description ¹ "Receivable". * Weighted by: Ending Market Value + Accrued, except Book Yield by Base Book Value + Accrued.Identifier,Description,Security Type% of MarketValue +AccruedCoupon TypeCallableDurationS&PRating,Moody'sRatingEnding Current UnitsEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityBookYield,YieldEnding AccruedBalanceOriginal CostEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued912828L24UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.934%FixedN2.827AA+Aaa100,000.0008/31/202208/31/20221.5551.579159.68100,953.13100,909.27101,068.96100,839.80100,999.48912828L24UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV1.167%FixedN2.827AA+Aaa125,000.0008/31/202208/31/20221.6881.579199.61125,668.95125,661.05125,860.66126,049.75126,249.36912828L57UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV3.484%FixedN2.913AA+Aaa375,000.0009/30/202209/30/20221.7701.58017.93374,765.63374,787.32374,805.25376,860.38376,878.31912828N30UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV4.159%FixedN3.118AA+Aaa440,000.0012/31/202212/31/20221.5901.5842,362.91447,528.13447,413.79449,776.70447,510.80449,873.71912828P38UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV4.055%FixedN3.219AA+Aaa435,000.0001/31/202301/31/20231.4341.5871,282.54439,570.90439,450.52440,733.06437,293.76438,576.30---UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV74.060%FixedN2.118AA+Aaa7,895,000.0012/06/202112/06/20212.2701.65428,325.497,882,684.037,890,125.457,918,450.947,982,291.478,010,616.96Identifier,Description,Security Type% of MarketValue +AccruedCoupon TypeCallableDurationS&PRating,Moody'sRatingEnding Current UnitsEndingEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityBookYield,YieldEnding AccruedBalanceOriginal CostEnding Book Value,Book Value + AccruedMarket Value,Ending Market Value +Accrued---------100.000%Fixed---1.854AAAa110,671,765.7808/29/202108/30/20212.2881.72740,193.4410,651,440.2510,664,257.6110,704,451.0510,776,206.9210,816,400.36Security Type GASB 40 Trade DateSan Jacinto, City of (66779)As of 09/30/2019Return to Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/2019153.A.3.aPacket Pg. 78Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Identifier,Description,Security TypeInterest/DividendReceivedTransfers In/OutPurchasesPurchasedAccruedIncomeSalesDisposed AccruedMaturities andRedemptionsPaydownsNet RealizedGain/LossBeginning OriginalCost,Ending Original CostBeginning MarketValue,Ending Market Value31846V203FIRST AMER:GVT OBLG YMMFUND33.470.00214,952.120.00-125,889.020.000.000.000.0017,702.68106,765.7817,702.68106,765.78CCYUSDCashCASH0.00-104.170.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00CCYUSDReceivableCASH0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.007,558.47108.117,558.47108.11459200JN2INTERNATIONAL BUSINESSMACHINES CORPCORP0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00299,712.00299,712.00299,726.36299,791.82594918BV5MICROSOFT CORPCORP0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00149,899.50149,899.50149,891.56149,928.4425468PDP8WALT DISNEY COCORP2,925.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00298,956.00298,956.00300,014.31299,860.26037833CS7APPLE INCCORP0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00124,872.50124,872.50124,863.86124,917.43458140AZ3INTEL CORPCORP0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00249,905.00249,905.00249,917.99249,820.16037833CZ1APPLE INCCORP900.000.000.000.000.000.00-120,000.000.000.00119,896.800.00119,980.650.00375558BR3GILEAD SCIENCES INCCORP508.750.000.000.000.000.00-55,000.000.000.0054,980.750.0055,000.060.00931142DY6WAL-MART STORES INCCORP0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.0044,999.1044,999.1044,983.8044,995.509128284B3UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV4,037.500.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00339,455.47339,455.47343,851.52343,028.043137EAEL9FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGECORPAGCY BOND0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00521,808.00521,808.00530,848.44529,244.6602665WCH2AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPCORP0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.0074,898.7574,898.7575,539.2875,484.059128283X6UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00325,952.35325,952.35332,874.63332,152.599128284P2UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00328,723.83328,723.83335,710.65334,756.6217305EFW0CCCIT 16A1 A1ABS0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00197,429.69197,429.69199,818.88199,899.989128285A4UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV4,125.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00298,722.65298,722.65307,406.40306,410.10912828Y20UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00436,803.13436,803.13448,576.48447,150.0002665WCP4AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPCORP0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00174,916.00174,916.00180,633.22179,906.29912828F21UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV4,621.880.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00428,491.99428,491.99440,369.64438,993.30Portfolio Activity SummarySan Jacinto, City of (66779)09/01/2019 - 09/30/2019Return to Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/2019163.A.3.aPacket Pg. 79Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Identifier,Description,Security TypeInterest/DividendReceivedTransfers In/OutPurchasesPurchasedAccruedIncomeSalesDisposed AccruedMaturities andRedemptionsPaydownsNet RealizedGain/LossBeginning OriginalCost,Ending Original CostBeginning MarketValue,Ending Market Value9128285L0UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00437,090.04437,090.04447,812.05446,045.093135G0U92FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATIONAGCY BOND0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00129,906.40129,906.40133,301.43132,777.049128285R7UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00250,664.06250,664.06256,416.00255,507.759128284T4UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.00-446,823.44-2,808.610.000.006,139.18440,928.130.00448,112.720.00912828WY2UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00436,940.63436,940.63445,792.16444,451.48912828D72UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2,500.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00246,748.05246,748.05252,304.75251,543.00912828W55UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV937.500.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.0098,101.5698,101.56100,976.60100,585.90912828XG0UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00148,089.85148,089.85152,894.55152,173.80912828G87UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00284,242.97284,242.97289,141.34288,105.939128286H8UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV3,384.380.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00286,425.00286,425.00291,535.05290,432.673137AXHP1FHMS K024 A2FHLMC CMO686.130.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00319,687.50319,687.50326,789.02325,197.54912828SF8UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00314,778.52314,778.52319,097.52317,891.70912828V72UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00313,621.88313,621.88317,891.70316,747.30912828B90UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV3,150.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00314,310.94314,310.94316,722.73316,107.54912828WG1UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00315,922.85315,922.85318,322.30317,522.52912828C57UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV3,543.750.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00315,762.89315,762.89318,064.01317,313.36912828L57UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV3,281.250.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00374,765.63374,765.63378,559.50376,860.38912828J76UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV4,156.250.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00473,348.63473,348.63478,599.55476,818.30912828L24UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV937.500.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00100,953.13100,953.13101,281.20100,839.8030231GBB7EXXON MOBIL CORPCORP0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.0075,000.0075,000.0075,476.9475,326.51912828P38UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00439,570.90439,570.90439,621.88437,293.76Portfolio Activity SummarySan Jacinto, City of (66779)09/01/2019 - 09/30/2019Return to Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/2019173.A.3.aPacket Pg. 80Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
* Weighted by: Ending Market Value + Accrued. * Holdings Displayed by: Lot.Identifier,Description,Security TypeInterest/DividendReceivedTransfers In/OutPurchasesPurchasedAccruedIncomeSalesDisposed AccruedMaturities andRedemptionsPaydownsNet RealizedGain/LossBeginning OriginalCost,Ending Original CostBeginning MarketValue,Ending Market Value912828N30UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.00447,528.13-1,880.160.000.000.000.000.000.00447,528.130.00447,510.80912828L24UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV0.000.00125,668.95-115.900.000.000.000.000.000.00125,668.950.00126,049.75---------39,728.36-104.17788,149.20-1,996.06-572,712.46-2,808.61-175,000.000.006,139.1810,612,544.2210,651,548.3610,773,981.8810,776,315.03Portfolio Activity SummarySan Jacinto, City of (66779)09/01/2019 - 09/30/2019Return to Table of ContentsDated: 10/07/2019183.A.3.aPacket Pg. 81Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
Additional Disclosure:This information is for the sole purposes of the client and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations. Please review the contents of this information carefully. Should you have any questions regarding theinformation presented, calculation methodology, investment portfolio, security detail, or any other facet of this information, please feel free to contact us.Public Trust Advisors, LLC (Public Trust) statements and reports are intended to detail our investment advisory activity as well as the activity of certain client accounts managed by Public Trust. The custodian bank maintainsthe control of assets and executes and settles all investment transactions. The custodian statement is the official record of security and cash holdings transactions. Public Trust recognizes that clients may use these reports tofacilitate record keeping; therefore, it is recommended that the client reconcile this information with their custodian bank statement. Many custodians use a settlement date basis that may result in the need to reconcile due to atiming difference. The underlying market value, amortized cost, and accrued interest may differ between the custodian and this statement or report. This can be attributed to differences in calculation methodologies and pricingsources used.Public Trust does not have the authority to withdraw funds from or deposit funds to the custodian. Our clients retain responsibility for their internal accounting policies, implementing and enforcing internal controls, andgenerating ledger entries or otherwise recording transactions. The total market value represents prices obtained from various sources; it may be impacted by the frequency at which prices are reported, and such prices are notguaranteed. Prices received from pricing vendors are generally based on current market quotes but when such quotes are not available, the pricing vendors use a variety of techniques to estimate value. These estimates,particularly for fixed-income securities, may be based on certain minimum principal amounts (e.g. $1 million) and may not reflect all the factors that affect the value of the security including liquidity risk. The prices provided arenot firm bids or offers. Certain securities may reflect N/A or unavailable where the price for such security is generally not available from a pricing source. The market value of a security, including those priced at par value, maydiffer from its purchase price and may not closely reflect the value at which the security may be sold or purchased based on various market factors. The securities in this investment portfolio, including shares of mutual funds,are not guaranteed or otherwise protected by Public Trust, the FDIC (except for certain non-negotiable certificates of deposit), or any government agency unless specifically stated otherwise.Clients may be permitted to establish one or more unmanaged accounts for the purposes of client reporting. Clients may also be permitted to provide externally managed assets for the purposes of client reporting. Public Trustdefines unmanaged accounts or assets as one where the investment direction remains the sole responsibility of the client rather than the Investment Manager. Unmanaged accounts or external assets do not receive ongoingsupervision and monitoring services. The Investment Manager does not make any investment recommendations and may not charge a fee for reporting on these accounts or assets. The primary purpose for this service is toinclude unmanaged accounts or assets owned by the client in the performance reports provided by the Investment Manager. The Investment Manager assumes no liability for the underlying performance of any unmanagedaccounts or assets, and it is the client’s sole responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of any such performance.Beginning and ending balances are based on market value plus accrued interest on a trade date basis. Statements and reports made available to the end user either from Public Trust or through the online reporting platformmay present information and portfolio analytics using various optional methods including, but not limited to, historical cost, amortized cost, and market value. All information is assumed to be correct, but the accuracy has notbeen confirmed and therefore is not guaranteed to be correct. Information is obtained from third party sources that may or may not be verified. The data in this report is unaudited and is only applicable for the date denoted onthe report. Market values may change day-to-day based on numerous circumstances such as trading volume, news released about the underlying issuer, issuer performance, etc. Underlying market values may be priced vianumerous aspects as certain securities are short term in nature and not readily traded. Performance results are shown net of all fees and expenses and reflect the reinvestment of dividends and other earnings.Many factors affect performance including changes in market conditions and interest rates and in response to other economic, political, or financial developments. Investment involves risk including the possible loss ofprincipal. No assurance can be given that the performance objectives of a given strategy will be achieved. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Any financial and/or investment decision may incur losses.The investment advisor providing these services is Public Trust Advisors, LLC, an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, asamended. Registration with the SEC does not imply a certain level of skill or training. Public Trust is required to maintain a written disclosure brochure of our background and business experience. If you would like to receive acopy of our current disclosure brochure, Privacy Policy, or Code of Ethics, or have any questions regarding your account please contact us.Public Trust Advisors717 17th St. Suite 1850Denver, CO 802023.A.3.aPacket Pg. 82Attachment: September Report (Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2019)
November 5, 2019
TO: City Council
REQUESTED BY: Michelle Holmes, Director of Finance
APPROVED BY: Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Continuing Appropriations FY 2019-20
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council approve a continuing appropriation increase of $544,971
from original designated fund balances for construction-in-progress projects and various other
expenditures encumbered at June 30, 2019 into the FY 2019-20 Budget.
SUMMARY:
This budget action adjusts the FY 2019-20 Budget for continuing appropriations on capital
projects and various other expenditures that were in progress in the prior fiscal year, but not yet
completed as of June 30, 2019.
BACKGROUND:
The original budget generally requests appropriation of funds for new expenditures and capital
projects, or for construction-in-progress projects requiring additional funding. It is generally
assumed that budgeted expenditures are completed in the year the budget is adopted. However,
some expenditures, particularly capital projects, may not fully complete within the same budget
cycle, requiring carryover into subsequent budget years. Performing continuing appropriations is
an annual function designed to cover expenses from prior fiscal year projects that flow into the
following budget cycle.
DISCUSSION:
Resolution No. 3773, adopting the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Budget, authorizes in Section 7 the
carryover of unexpended, unencumbered Capital Project Funds, estimated at $9,997,447,
including Successor Agency projects totaling $41,405. The actual carryover amount for City
Capital Projects from June 30, 2019 is $10,124,636. Additionally, the carryover of c ertain
purchase orders ($417,782) initiated prior to year-end and not fully expended by June 30, 2019,
is necessary. The total budget adjustment to City Funds is an increase of $544,971, which is the
difference between the initial budget estimates and the actual carryover amounts. There were no
Successor Agency carryover adjustments.
FISCAL IMPACT:
An estimate of the proposed continuing appropriations was assumed in establishing the adopted
FY 2019-20 Budget. Total budget adjustment increase to City Funds is $544,971.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution 3773 Budget Adoption - Signed
3.A.4
Packet Pg. 83
Purchase Order Roll-overs 1920
CIP Continuing Appropriations 19-20
3.A.4
Packet Pg. 84
3.A.4.aPacket Pg. 85Attachment: Resolution 3773 Budget Adoption - Signed (Continuing Appropriations FY 2019-20)
3.A.4.aPacket Pg. 86Attachment: Resolution 3773 Budget Adoption - Signed (Continuing Appropriations FY 2019-20)
3.A.4.aPacket Pg. 87Attachment: Resolution 3773 Budget Adoption - Signed (Continuing Appropriations FY 2019-20)
3.A.4.aPacket Pg. 88Attachment: Resolution 3773 Budget Adoption - Signed (Continuing Appropriations FY 2019-20)
CITY OF SAN JACINTOSCHEDULE OF PURCHASE ORDERS TO BEROLLED-OVER FROM 18/19 TO 19/20ORIGINAL ORROLL-OVERP.O.ROLL-OVERAMOUNTAMOUNTP.O. # DATEVENDORPURPOSE P.O. AMOUNTIN 18/19 TO 19/20ACCOUNT1318 03/07/19 Plumbers Depot, Inc. Wasterwater Vactor Purchase 417,782.38$ - 417,782.38$ 055-4170-450.4045TOTAL PURCHASE ORDERS417,782.38$ - 417,782.38$ 3.A.4.bPacket Pg. 89Attachment: Purchase Order Roll-overs 1920 (Continuing Appropriations FY 2019-20)
CITY OF SAN JACINTOCAPITAL PROJECTS - Variance between Budget and Actual Carryover from 2018-19FY 2018/2019 Gen Fund Gas Tax Meas "A" Traffic Safety RMRA CDBG Flood Control Traffic Signal Indian Game Hwy 79 Carpool TUMF DIF:Comm Amenities RDA Sucsr TotalProject # Project Description Available Fund 010 Fund 021 Fund 022 Fund 024 Fund 027 Fund 029 Fund 039 Fund 041 Fund 068 Fund 072 Fund 074 Fund 083 Fund 131 Fund 189 Funding DifferenceProjects03-054 SJRiver Levee Prelim Eng 21,236.88$ - - - - - - 21,236.88 - - - - - - - 21,236.88 - 06-145 Esplanade Ave Widening Phase 1 -$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07-011 Hewitt Street Rehab and Storm Drain (172.50)$ - - (172.50) - - - - - - - - - - - (172.50) - 10-002 Palm & Cottonwood Signal -$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12-008 Mountain Avenue Pavement Rehab (230.00)$ - - (230.00) - - - - - - - - - - - (230.00) - 15-003 SJ MDP Line E-2 & Line E-2A 18,460.53$ - - - - - - 18,460.53 - - - - - - - 18,460.53 - 15-004 Ramona Expressway Median L/S -$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17-002 Cottonwood Widening & Sidewalk 6,705.00$ 6,705.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6,705.00 - 17-004 Sanderson Safety Improve (HSIP Cycle 8) 35,299.03$ - - 35,299.03 - - - - - - - - - - - 35,299.03 - 18-002 CW Slurry Seal & Grind/Overlay -$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18-004 2017 CDBG Library Parking Lot Imp (114,900.37)$ - - - - - (109,817.87) - - - - - - (5,082.50) - (114,900.37) (0.00) 18-005 ATP Cycle 2 - San Jacinto Valley Connect -$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19-001 Shaver/San Jacinto Traffic Signal (14,101.35)$ - - - - - - - - - (14,101.35) - - - - (14,101.35) - 19-002 Vosburg Purchase and Maint 10,000.00$ 10,000.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10,000.00 0.00 Ongoing ActivitiesCP-001 City -Wide Speed Hump Program -$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CP-002 Traffic Control Devices/Studies (18,642.36)$ - - - (18,642.36) - - - - - - - - - - (18,642.36) Programs18-006 San Jacinto General Plan Update 197,254.62$ 197,254.62 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 197,254.62 - 18-007 Economic Development Incentives (13,720.40)$ (13,720.40) - - - - - - - - - - - - - (13,720.40) (0.00) Sub-Total City Projects127,189.08$ 200,239.22 - 34,896.53 (18,642.36) - (109,817.87) 39,697.41 - - (14,101.35) - - (5,082.50) - 127,189.08 (0.00) 03-062 Housing Rehab Program -$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sub-Total Successor Agency Projects-$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total All Projects127,189.08$ 200,239.22 - 34,896.53 (18,642.36) - (109,817.87) 39,697.41 - - (14,101.35) - - (5,082.50) - 127,189.08 (0.00) 3.A.4.cPacket Pg. 90Attachment: CIP Continuing Appropriations 19-20 (Continuing Appropriations FY 2019-20)
CITY OF SAN JACINTOFY 2018/2019 CAPITAL PROJECTS ROLLOVERFY 2018/2019 Gen Fund Gas Tax Meas "A" Traffic Safety RMRA CDBG Flood Control Traffic Signal Indian Gaming Hwy 79 Carpool Mit TUMF DIF:Comm Amen RDA Sucsr TotalProject # Project Description Available Fund 010 Fund 021 Fund 022 Fund 024 Fund 027 Fund 029 Fund 039 Fund 041 Fund 068 Fund 072 Fund 074 Fund 083 Fund 131 Fund 189 Funding DifferenceProjects03-054 SJRiver Levee Prelim Eng 21,236.88$ - - - - - - 21,236.88 - - - - - - - 21,236.88 - 06-145 Esplanade Ave Widening Phase 1 1,600,000.00$ - - - - - - - - - - - 1,600,000.00 - - 1,600,000.00 - 07-011 Hewitt Street Rehab and Storm Drain 449,827.50$ - - 449,827.50 - - - - - - - - - - - 449,827.50 - 10-002 Palm & Cottonwood Signal 20,000.00$ - - - - - - - 20,000.00 - - - - - - 20,000.00 - 12-008 Mountain Avenue Pavement Rehab 304,770.00$ - - 304,770.00 - - - - - - - - - - - 304,770.00 - 15-003 SJ MDP Line E-2 & Line E-2A 1,356,897.03$ - - - - - - 1,356,897.03 - - - - - - - 1,356,897.03 - 15-004 Ramona Expressway Median L/S 212,960.56$ - 172,973.06 - - - - - - 39,987.50 - - - - - 212,960.56 - 17-002 Cottonwood Widening & Sidewalk 516,705.00$ 316,705.00 - 200,000.00 - - - - - - - - - - - 516,705.00 - 17-004 Sanderson Safety Improve (HSIP Cycle1,166,130.37$ 820,440.00 214,017.00 131,673.37 - - - - - - - - - - - 1,166,130.37 - 18-002 CW Slurry Seal & Grind/Overlay 500,000.00$ - - 250,000.00 - 250,000.00 - - - - - - - - - 500,000.00 - 18-004 2017 CDBG Library Parking Lot Imp 891,851.42$ - - - - - 412,534.53 - - - - 210,000.00 - 269,316.89 - 891,851.42 - 18-005ATP Cycle 2 - San Jacinto Valley Conn913,000.00$ 566,000.00 - 347,000.00 - - - - - - - - - - - 913,000.00 - 19-001 Shaver/San Jacinto Traffic Signal 193,598.65$ - - - - - - - - - 193,598.65 - - - - 193,598.65 - 19-002 Vosburg Purchase and Maint 83,620.21$ 83,620.21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 83,620.21 - Ongoing ActivitiesCP-001 City -Wide Speed Hump Program 55,199.57$ 55,199.57 55,199.57 - CP-002 Traffic Control Devices/Studies 2,929.35$ 2,929.35 2,929.35 - Programs18-006 San Jacinto General Plan Update 845,036.47$ 845,036.47 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 845,036.47 - 18-007 Economic Development Incentives 949,467.88$ 949,467.88 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 949,467.88 - Sub-total City Projects10,083,230.89$ 3,581,269.56 386,990.06 1,683,270.87 58,128.92 250,000.00 412,534.53 1,378,133.91 20,000.00 39,987.50 193,598.65 210,000.00 1,600,000.00 269,316.89 - 10,083,230.89 - 03-062 Housing Rehab Program 41,405.00$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - 41,405.00 41,405.00 - Sub-total Successor Agency Projects41,405.00$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - 41,405.00 41,405.00 - Total All Projects10,124,635.89$ 3,581,269.56 386,990.06 1,683,270.87 58,128.92 250,000.00 412,534.53 1,378,133.91 20,000.00 39,987.50 193,598.65 210,000.00 1,600,000.00 269,316.89 41,405.00 10,124,635.89 - 3.A.4.cPacket Pg. 91Attachment: CIP Continuing Appropriations 19-20 (Continuing Appropriations FY 2019-20)
CITY OF SAN JACINTOFY 2018/2019 CIP BUDGET - CARRYOVER ONLYFY 2018/2019 Gen Fund Gas Tax Meas "A" Traffic Safety RMRA CDBG Flood Control Traffic Signal Indian Game Hwy 79 Carpool TUMF DIF:Comm Amenities RDA Sucsr TotalProject # Project Description Available Fund 010 Fund 021 Fund 022 Fund 024 Fund 027 Fund 029 Fund 039 Fund 041 Fund 068 Fund 072 Fund 074 Fund 083 Fund 131 Fund 189 Funding DifferenceProjects03-054 SJRiver Levee Prelim Eng -$ - - - 06-145 Esplanade Ave Widening Phase 1 1,600,000.00$ 1,600,000.00 1,600,000.00 - 07-011 Hewitt Street Rehab and Storm Drain 450,000.00$ 450,000.00 - 450,000.00 - 10-002 Palm & Cottonwood Signal 20,000.00$ 20,000.00 20,000.00 - 12-008 Mountain Avenue Pavement Rehab 305,000.00$ - 305,000.00 305,000.00 - 15-003 SJ MDP Line E-2 & Line E-2A 1,338,436.50$ 1,338,436.50 1,338,436.50 - 15-004 Ramona Expressway Median L/S 212,960.56$ 172,973.06 39,987.50 212,960.56 - 17-002 Cottonwood Widening & Sidewalk 510,000.00$ 310,000.00 200,000.00 510,000.00 - 17-004 Sanderson Safety Improve (HSIP Cycl1,130,831.34$ 820,440.00 214,017.00 96,374.34 1,130,831.34 - 18-002 CW Slurry Seal & Grind/Overlay500,000.00$ 250,000.00 250,000.00 500,000.00 - 18-004 2017 CDBG Library Parking Lot Imp 1,006,751.79$ 522,352.40 210,000.00 274,399.39 1,006,751.79 - 18-005 ATP Cycle 2 - San Jacinto Valley Conn913,000.00$ 566,000.00 347,000.00 913,000.00 - 19-001 Shaver/San Jacinto Traffic Signal 207,700.00$ 207,700.00 207,700.00 - 19-002 Vosburg Purchase and Maint 73,620.21$ 73,620.21 73,620.21 (0.00) Ongoing ActivitiesCP-001 City -Wide Speed Hump Program 55,199.57$ 55,199.57 55,199.57 - CP-002 Traffic Control Devices/Studies 21,571.71$ 21,571.71 21,571.71 Programs18-006 San Jacinto General Plan Update 647,781.85$ 647,781.85 647,781.85 - 18-007 Economic Development Incentives 963,188.28$ 963,188.28 963,188.28 - Sub-Total City Projects9,956,041.81$ 3,381,030.34 386,990.06 1,648,374.34 76,771.28 250,000.00 522,352.40 1,338,436.50 20,000.00 39,987.50 207,700.00 210,000.00 1,600,000.00 274,399.39 - 9,956,041.81 - 03-062 Housing Rehab Program 41,405.00$ 41,405.00 41,405.00 - Sub-Total Successor Agency Projects41,405.00$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - 41,405.00 41,405.00 - Total All Projects9,997,446.81$ 3,381,030.34 386,990.06 1,648,374.34 76,771.28 250,000.00 522,352.40 1,338,436.50 20,000.00 39,987.50 207,700.00 210,000.00 1,600,000.00 274,399.39 41,405.00 9,997,446.81 - 3.A.4.cPacket Pg. 92Attachment: CIP Continuing Appropriations 19-20 (Continuing Appropriations FY 2019-20)
November 5, 2019
TO: City Council
REQUESTED BY: Travis Randel, Community Development Director
APPROVED BY: Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19
RECOMMENDATION:
1. DETERMINE that the proposed Project will not have a significant effect on the
environment based on the findings set forth in the case record and:
a. ADOPT A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program (MMRP) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA); and
2. CONDUCT the second reading and Adopt Ordinance No 19 -18 approving Change of Zone
17-05 to change the Zone from CN - Commercial Neighborhood to CG - Commercial
General;
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 17-05, A ZONE
CHANGE FROM COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO COMMERCIAL
GENERAL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RAMONA EXPRESSWAY
EXTENDING BETWEEN MAIN STREET AND DONNA WAY (APNs 433-
160-024,027,028,029,032,033, and 034)
3. ADOPT Resolution No. 3781 to:
a. APPROVE Site Plan Design Review 17-17 (SPDR-17-17) for the overall site design of
a commercial retail center, which includes a 14,583 square foot retail building, a 9,360
square foot retail building, a service station with a 3,048 square foot convenience store
with off-sale beer and wine and a 1,105 square foot car wash, a 3,200 square foot fast
food restaurant, a 2,800 square foot fast food restaurant, and the design review for the
construction of a 14,583 square foot retail building, subject to conditions of approval;
b. APPROVE Conditional Use Permit 17-09 (CUP-17-09) for a service station and
convenience store with off-sale alcohol sales, subject to the conditions of approval and
Variance 17-05 (VAR-17-05) to allow 24 fuel pumps at a single station where a
maximum of 15 are permitted by the Development Code;
c. APPROVE Minor Use Permit 17-09 (MUP-17-09) to permit a 3,200 square foot fast
food restaurant with drive-through service, subject to the conditions of approval;
4.1
Packet Pg. 93
d. APPROVE Minor Use Permit 17-10 (MUP-17-10) to permit a 2,800 square foot fast
food restaurant with drive-through service, subject to the conditions of approval,
e. APPROVE Minor Use Permit 17-11 (MUP-17-11) to exceed the City’s parking
requirement by more than five percent.
DISCUSSION:
The Project is located on the west side of Ramona Expressway, extending between Main Street
and Donna Way and includes:
Two retail buildings totaling 23,943 square feet;
A service station with a 3,048 square foot convenience store with an off-sale general
alcohol license, 24 fuel pumps, and a 1,105 square foot car wash;
A 3,200 square-foot fast food restaurant with drive-through service; and
A 2,800 square-foot fast food restaurant with drive-through service.
To facilitate the project, the applicant has requested approval of the following entitlements:
A Site Plan and Design Review (SPDR-17-17);
A Conditional Use Permit (CUP-17-09) to permit a service station and convenience store
with an off-sale general alcohol license and an automated car wash;
Minor Use Permits (MUP-17-09 & MUP-17-10) to permit two fast food restaurants with
drive-through service;
A Minor Use Permit (MUP-17-11) to exceed the City’s parking requirement by more
than five percent;
A Variance (VAR-17-05) to allow 24 fuel pumps at a single station where a maximum of
15 are permitted by the Development Code; and
A Change of Zone (CZ-17-05) to change the Zone from Commercial Neighborhood to
Commercial General.
On September 17, 2019, the City Council held a Public Hearing to consider the Project and
introduce Ordinance No. 19-18 for the first reading of Change of Zone 17-05. The project was
continued to October 1, 2019 for a 2nd reading of Ordinance 19-18 and a decision to be made on
the project. Staff requested two additional continuances to October 15, 2019, and then to
November 5, 2019 to allow the Joint Project Review (JPR) process to be concluded by the
Western County Riverside Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) prior to project approval.
The JPR is a required process for most projects located within a Criteria Area and determines if
the project would affect the goals of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The application was submitted to the RCA on August 29, 2019,
however revisions were requested, which required revisions to the technical documents. Formal
action from the RCA was completed on October 17, 2019 that determined the project is
consistent with both the Criteria and Other Plan requirements. This action became final on
October 28, 2019 after review by the State and Federal Resource Agencies.
4.1
Packet Pg. 94
Staff received one comment letter from the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) dated
September 17, 2019. The letter noted that the proposed service station would be located
approximately 1,000 feet from an EMWD production well and within one-half mile of
groundwater recharge ponds and planned production wells. Due to the close proximity of the
existing and proposed water facilities to the project, EMWD requests that the potential of the
proposed underground storage tanks (USTs) to impact the groundwater be assessed. In lieu of an
assessment, EMWD recommends the City condition the project to construct the fueling system in
a manner that exceeds the minimum local, State and Federal requirements, such as upgraded
tanks, containment and ancillary equipment, as well as increasing the number of critical leak
detection sensors and monitoring wells.
As a matter of information, the developer is required to construct the UST system in a manner
that complies with the regulatory requirements of Title 23 of the California Code of Regulations,
Chapter 6.7, which are enforced by the State and Regional Water Quality Control Board. Chapter
6.7 recognizes that UST used for the storage of hazardous substances, such as gasoline or diesel
fuel, are potential sources of contamination of the ground and underlying aquifers, and may pose
other dangers to public health and the environment. Chapter 6.7 requires that USTs installed on
or after 2004 include a variety of safety features to prevent the accidental release of hazardous
substances, including, but not limited to, secondary containment. The standards for new tanks
exceed previous standards for tanks installed prior to 2004, which required alternative upgrades
to minimize accidental release of materials.
Based on the required compliance with Chapter 6.7 of the California Health and Safety Code, the
potential for an accidental release with the potential to contaminate groundwater is less than
significant, and no additional analysis or mitigation is required.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:
The Initial Study has been updated since the September 17, 2019 Council Meeting to include
changes resulting from the JPR process and the EMWD letter. The changes are considered minor
and do not change the conclusions of any sections within the document, and no new mitigation
measures are required.
Based upon the information contained in the Initial Study and pursuant to the requirements of
CEQA, it has been determined that this Project, with the incorporation of mitigation measures,
will not have a significant impact on the environment. The mitigation measures required to
reduce or mitigate the impacts of this Project on the environment are included in the Proj ect
design and/or the Mitigation Monitoring Program and will be included as part of the Mitigated
Negative Declaration for this Project.
CONCLUSION:
As designed and conditioned, the Project will be a welcome addition along Ramona Expressway
and in the City. The Project offers area residents and the traveling public another choice for
gasoline and food, car wash, and retail sales, promoting job opportunities, and strengthening the
local buying power.
4.1
Packet Pg. 95
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact to the General Fund since all project costs are borne by the applicant.
ATTACHMENTS:
Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019
RESOLUTION 3781-11-5-19
JPR Letter and Findings
Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19
4.1
Packet Pg. 96
October 15, 2019
TO: City Council
REQUESTED BY: Travis Randel, Community Development Director
APPROVED BY: Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,
VAR-17-05)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council continue this item to November 5, 2019.
DISCUSSION:
On September 17, 2019, the City Council held a public hearing for the Luiseno Village Project
and introduced Ordinance No. 19-18 for Change of Zone 17-05. The item was continued to
October 1, 2019, for the 2nd reading of the ordinance and conditional approval of the project
following completion of the Joint Project Review by the Western Riverside County Regional
Conservation Authority (RCA). The applicant submitted revised documents for the Joint Project
Review to the RCA on October 4, 2019 and the review is expected to be completed by October
28, 2019. Therefore, staff recommends continuance of this item until November 5, 2019.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact to the General Fund since all project costs are borne by the applicant.
ATTACHMENTS:
Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019
4.1
Packet Pg. 55
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
October 1, 2019
TO: City Council
REQUESTED BY: Travis Randel, Community Development Director
APPROVED BY: Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,
VAR-17-05)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council continue this item to October 15, 2019.
DISCUSSION:
On September 17, 2019, the City Council held a public hearing for the Luiseno Village Project
and introduced Ordinance No. 19-18 for Change of Zone 17-05. The item was continued to
October 1, 2019, for the 2nd reading of the ordinance and conditional approval of the project.
However, staff has been informed that the Joint Project Review being managed by the Western
Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority has not yet been completed, which means
that the environmental review has not officially concluded. Therefore, staff recommends
continuance of this item until October 15, 2019.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There are no fiscal impacts associated with this item.
ATTACHMENTS:
September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report
4.1
Packet Pg. 101
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
September 17, 2019
TO: City Council
REQUESTED BY: Travis Randel, Community Development Director
APPROVED BY: Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,
VAR-17-05)
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. INTRODUCE Ordinance No. 19-18 for first reading approving Change of Zone 17-05 to
change the Zone from CN - Commercial Neighborhood to CG - Commercial General;
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 17-05, A ZONE CHANGE FROM
COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL LOCATED ON THE
WEST SIDE OF RAMONA EXPRESSWAY EXTENDING BETWEEN MAIN STREET AND
DONNA WAY (APNs 433-160-024,027,028,029,032,033, and 034)
2. Open the Public Hearing for the Luiseno Village Project and take public testimony; and
3. CONTINUE the Public Hearing to October 1, 2019.
BACKGROUND:
On August 27, 2019, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing and unanimously
recommended that the City Council approve the Luiseno Village Project. The Project, consisting
of 9.4 acres, is located on the west side of Ramona Expressway, extending between Main Street
and Donna Way and includes:
Two retail buildings totaling 23,943 square feet;
A service station with a 3,048 square foot convenience store with an off-sale general
alcohol license, 24 fuel pumps, and a 1,105 square foot car wash;
A 3,200 square-foot fast food restaurant with drive-through service; and
A 2,800 square-foot fast food restaurant with drive-through service.
To facilitate the project, the applicant is requesting approval of the following entitlements:
Site Plan and Design Review (SPDR-17-17);
Conditional Use Permit (CUP-17-09) to permit a service station with a convenience store
and an off-sale general alcohol license and an automated car wash;
Minor Use Permits (MUP-17-09 & MUP-17-10) to permit two fast food restaurants with
drive-through service;
4.1
Packet Pg. 78
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Minor Use Permit (MUP-17-11) to exceed the City’s parking requirement by more than
five percent;
Variance (VAR-17-05) to allow 24 fuel pumps at a single station where a maximum of
15 are permitted by the Development Code; and
Change of Zone (CZ-17-05) to change the Zone from Commercial Neighborhood to
Commercial General.
While the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the project, they also
recommended striking condition 59. Staff supports the proposed change as Condition 59 was
redundant and partially conflicted with other, more specific, Conditions of Approval.
DISCUSSION:
The Luiseno Village Project will be a welcome addition to the Ramona Expressway Corridor
providing additional food, gas, and retail venues for area residents. Details of the Project can be
found in the attached Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 3).
The project is located within Criteria Cells 3098 and 3099 of the Western Riverside County
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. A Criteria Refinement has been proposed as part of
the project and a Joint Project Review (“JPR”) is in process with t he Riverside Conservation
Authority. Staff anticipates the JPR to be completed in the next several days, and as such,
recommend that the City Council continue the public hearing to October 1, 2019, before
adopting the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration and approval resolution. The continued
Public Hearing would coincide with the second reading of the Rezoning Ordinance and ensure
compliance with any requirements from the JPR.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:
Based upon the information contained in the Initial Study and pursuant to the requirements of
CEQA, it has been determined that this Project, with the incorporation of mitigation measures,
will not have a significant impact on the environment. The mitigation measures required to
reduce or mitigate the impacts of this Project on the environment are included in the Project
design and/or the Mitigation Monitoring Program and will be included as part of the Mitigated
Negative Declaration for this Project.
CONCLUSION:
As designed and conditioned, the Project will be a welcome addition along Ramona Expressway
and in the City. The Project offers area residents and the traveling public another choice for
gasoline and food, car wash, and retail sales, promoting job opportunities, and strengthening the
local buying power.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact to the General Fund since all project costs are borne by the applicant.
ATTACHMENTS:
1 - Ordinance 19-18
2 - Resolution 3781
4.1
Packet Pg. 79
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
3 - PC Staff Report
4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval
4.1
Packet Pg. 80
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Page 1 of 6
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ORDINANCE NO: 19-18
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 17-05, A
ZONE CHANGE FROM COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF
RAMONA EXPRESSWAY EXTENDING BETWEEN MAIN STREET AND
DONNA WAY
WHEREAS, the Saboba Band of Luiseno Indians filed a Change of Zone 17-05
application on November 21, 2017 for Luiseno Village (“Applications), located on the
west side of Ramona Expressway extending between Main Street and Donna Way
(“Subject Site”);
WHEREAS, the Application Change of Zone 17-05 proposes to change the Zone
from CN – Commercial Neighborhood to CG – Commercial (“Project”) ;
WHEREAS, the Application was reviewed, studied, and found to comply with the
California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) as more fully described below:
WHEREAS, on August 27, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of San
Jacinto (“Commission”) conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which
time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the Project were heard, and the
Project was comprehensively reviewed, and the Project was recommended for approval
by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on September 17th and October 1st, 2019, the City Council of the
City of San Jacinto conducted duly noticed public hearings on the Application at which
time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the Application were heard and the
Application was comprehensively reviewed by the City Council.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are incorporated
herein and made an operative part of this Ordinance as though fully set
forth herein.
Section 2. Based on the entire record before the City Council, all written and oral
evidence presented, the recommendation and the findings made in this
Ordinance, the City Council hereby approves Change of Zone 17-05,
subject to the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: 1 - Ordinance 19-18 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Page 2 of 6
Section 3. Findings of Fact. The City Council of the City of San Jacinto hereby finds
and determines:
A. The proposed Change of Zone is consistent with the General Plan,
in that the Community Commercial Land Use Designation includes
both the current Commercial Neighborhood Zone and proposed
Commercial General Zone. There is not a specific plan for this
location.
B. The proposed Change of Zone promotes the growth of the City
consistent with the City’s General Plan. The Change of Zone will
facilitate commercial development along Ramona Expressway and
Main Street, as envisioned by the General Plan. As the project is
conditioned, it will not adversely affect the public convenience,
health, interest, safety or general welfare.
C. The site is physically suitable for development, as it is of
adequately sized property with an adequate width to depth ratio for
commercial development. The property is able to utilize, Main
Street, Ramona Expressway and Donna Way for ingress and
egress. Adequate infrastructure exists to support the project site
and the proposed land uses will be conditioned to ensure that their
design accommodates and provides for public and emergency
vehicles including solid waste haulers, City crews, and other
service and utility providers, as not to constitute a hazard.
Section 4. That the official Zoning Map of the City Council is hereby amended by
adding thereto Zone Change 17-05 rezoning, the certain properties as
described in Attachment “A” attached hereto from CN – Commercial
Neighborhood to – CG – Commercial General.
Section 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective on the 31st day following its
adoption.
Section 6. That an environmental analysis has been conducted wh ich evaluated
information and impacts based on the specifics of this proposed project.
This analysis determined that, although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to
by the project proponent and other effects will be mitigated to a level of
less than significant impact. Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration
and its associated Mitigation Monitoring Plan is recommended.
Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and cause the
same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and
published in the County of Riverside, State of California.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: 1 - Ordinance 19-18 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Page 3 of 6
Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 17th day of September 2019.
PASSED APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council
on the 1st Day of October 2019 by the following vote.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CITY OF SAN JACINTO:
___________________________
by Russell Utz, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Angela Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
__________________________
Michael J. Maurer, City Attorney
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: 1 - Ordinance 19-18 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Page 4 of 6
CERTIFICATION
State of California )
County of Riverside) ss
City of San Jacinto)
I, Angela Walton, duly appointed City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 19-18 was introduced at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the 17th day of September
2019. Ordinance No. 19-18 was passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of
the City of San Jacinto, California, at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
1st day of October 2019:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Witness my hand and seal the 1st day of October 2019.
_____________________________
Angela Walton, City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: 1 - Ordinance 19-18 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Page 5 of 6
ATTACHMENT “A”
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The land referred to is situated in the County of Riverside, City of San Jacinto, State of
California, and is described as follows:
Parcels 1, 2, 8 and 9, in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of California, as
shown by Parcel Map 20795 on file in Book 131, Pages 60 to 63 inclusive of Parcel Maps,
Records of Riverside County, California.
EXCEPT THEREFROM those portions conveyed to the City of San Jacinto, by document
Recorded March 19, 1987, as Instrument No. 74702 of Official Records of Riverside County,
California.
APN(S): 433-160-024-1; 433-160-027-4; 433-160-028-5; 433-160-029-6; 433-160-034-0;
433160-032-8; 433-160-033-9
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: 1 - Ordinance 19-18 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Page 6 of 6
ZONING MAP
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: 1 - Ordinance 19-18 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) RESOLUTION NO: 3781
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING SITE PLAN AND DESIGN
REVIEW 17-17 FOR A COMMERCIAL CENTER, CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT CUP-17-09 TO PERMIT A SERVICE STATION WITH AN
AUTOMATED CAR WASH AND A CONVENIENCE STORE WITH OFF-
SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL LICENSE; MINOR USE PERMIT 17-09 TO
PERMIT A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THROUGH,
MINOR USE PERMIT 17-10 TO PERMIT A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT
WITH DRIVE-THROUGH, MINOR USE PERMIT 17-11 TO EXCEED THE
PARKING REQUIREMENTS BY 5%, VARIANCE 17-05 TO ALLOW 24
FUEL PUMPS; LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RAMONA
EXPRESSWAY EXTENDING BETWEEN MAIN STREET AND DONNA
WAY.
WHEREAS, the Saboba Band of Luiseno Indians filed applications on November
21, 2017 and June 24, 2019: 1) Site Plan and Design Review (SPDR) 17-17; 2) Change
of Zone (CZ) 17-05; 3) Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 17-09; 4) Variance (VAR) 17-05;
5) Minor Use Permit (MUP) 17-09; 6) Minor Use Permit (MUP) 17-10; 7) Minor Use
Permit (MUP) 17-11; for Luiseno Village (“Applications”), located on the west side of
Ramona Expressway extending between Main Street and Donna Way (“Subject Site”);
WHEREAS, the Applications are proposed to develop the Luiseno Village Project
as a commercial development with SPDR 17-17 for the review of the commercial center
and overall site and building design of a 14,583 square foot retail building, CUP 17-09 to
permit a service station with an automated car wash and a convenience store with an
off-sale general alcohol license, MUP 17-09 to permit a fast food restaurant with a drive-
through, MUP 17-10 to permit a fast food restaurant with a drive-through, MUP 17-11 to
exceed the parking requirements by more than 5% and VAR 17 -05 to allow 24 fuel
pumps where a maximum of 15 are permitted by the Development Code (“Project”); and
WHEREAS, the Application was reviewed, studied, and found to comply with the
California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) as more fully described below; and
WHEREAS, on August 27, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of San
Jacinto (“Commission”) conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which
time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the Project were heard , and the
Project was comprehensively reviewed, and the project was recommended for approval
by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on September 17th and October 1st, 2019, the City Council of the
City of San Jacinto conducted duly noticed public hearings on the Application at which
time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the Application were heard and the
Application was comprehensively reviewed by the City Council; and
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: 2 - Resolution 3781 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, ordered and determined by the City
Council of the City of San Jacinto:
SECTION 1. Based on the entire record before the City Council, all written and
oral evidence presented, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the
findings made in this Resolution, the City Council hereby approves SPDR 17-17, CUP
17-09, MUP 17-09, MUP 17-10, MUP 17-11, and VAR 17-05, subject to the Findings of
Fact and Conditions of Approval in the staff report.
SECTION 2. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written
and oral evidence presented, the City Council finds:
The proposed use will not be detrimental to surrounding properties and
neighborhoods including ensuring that the use does not contribute to
loitering, public drunkenness, noise, obstructing pedestrian and
vehicular traffic, parking, crime, interference with pedestrian corridors
used by children, defacement, and damage to structures;
The proposed use will not adversely impact the suitability of adjacent
commercially zoned properties for commercial uses;
The proposed use will not adversely affect the welfare of residents in
the area or result in an undue concentration in the neighborhood of
establishments dispensing alcoholic beverages, including beer and
wine. For purposes of this subparagraph, “undue concentration” shall
be as defined in the Business and Professions Code Section 23958.4;
The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any
applicable specific plan;
The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zone and complies
with all other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the
Municipal Code;
The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed
activity will be compatible with the existing and future la nd uses in the
vicinity;
The site is physically suitable in terms of:
Its design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics of the
proposed use;
The provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access;
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: 2 - Resolution 3781 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Public protection services (e.g., fire protection, police protection, etc.);
and
The measure of site suitability shall be required to ensure that the type,
density, and intensity of use being proposed will not adversely affect the
public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare,
constitute a nuisance, or be materially injurious to the improvements,
persons, property, or uses in the vicinity and zone in which the property
is located;
The applicant agrees in writing to comply with any and all of the
conditions imposed by the Approving Authority in the approval of the
Conditional Use Permit.
The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed
activity will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the
vicinity.
There are special circumstances applicable to the subject property
(e.g., location, shape, size, surroundings, topography, or other physical
features) that do not apply generally to other properties in the vicinity
under an identical zoning classification;
Strict compliance with Development Code requirements would deprive
the subject property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the
vicinity and under an identical zoning classification;
Approving the Variance would not constitute a grant of special
privileges inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the
same vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated; and
The requested Variance would not allow a use or activity that is not
otherwise expressly authorized by the regulations go verning the subject
parcel.
SECTION 3. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written
and oral evidence presented, the City Council finds the A pplication complies with CEQA
for the following reasons:
An environmental analysis has been conducted which evaluated information and
impacts based on the specifics of this proposed project. This analysis determined
that, although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in
the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent and other
effects will be mitigated to a level of less than significant impact. Therefore, a
Mitigated Negative Declaration and its associated Mitigation Monitoring Plan is
recommended.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: 2 - Resolution 3781 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
SECTION 4. The location and custodian of the documents and any other
material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council based
its decision is as follows: Planning Director, City of San Jacinto Plann ing Department,
595 S. San Jacinto Ave, San Jacinto, CA 92583. (909) 487-7330.
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective upon its
adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council
on the 1st Day of October 2019 by the following vote.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CITY OF SAN J ACINTO:
_______________________
Russell Utz, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________
Angela Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
__________________________
Michael J. Maurer, City Attorney
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: 2 - Resolution 3781 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
CERTIFICATION
State of California )
County of Riverside) ss
City of San Jacinto)
I, Angela Walton, duly appointed City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 3781was duly passed, and adopted at a
regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the 1st day of October
2019 by the following vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Witness my hand and seal the 1st day of October 2019.
_____________________________
Angela Walton, City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: 2 - Resolution 3781 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
August 27, 2019
TO: Planning Commission
REQUESTED BY: Travis Randel, Community Development Director
APPROVED BY: Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and
MUP-17-09, 10, 11.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission:
1. DETERMINE that this proposed Project will not have a significant effect on the
environment based on the findings set forth in the case record and RECOMMEND that
the City Council:
a. ADOPT A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program (MMRP) pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA); and
2. RECOMMEND that the City Council:
a. APPROVE Change of Zone 17-05 (CZ-17-05), to change the Zone from CN -
Commercial Neighborhood to CG - Commercial General; and ADOPT the
necessary Zone Change Ordinance; and
b. APPROVE Site Plan Design Review 17-17 (SPDR-17-17) for the overall site
design of a commercial retail center, which includes a 14,583 square foot retail
building, a 9,360 square foot retail building, a service station with a 3,048 square
foot convenience store with off-sale beer and wine and a 1,105 square foot car
wash, a 3,200 square foot fast food restaurant, a 2,800 square foot fast food
restaurant, and the design review for the construction of a 14,583 square foot
retail building, subject to conditions of approval; and
c. APPROVE Conditional Use Permit 17-09 (CUP-17-09) for a service station and
convenience store with off-sale alcohol sales, subject to the conditions of approval
and Variance 17-05 (VAR-17-05) to allow 24 fuel pumps at a single station where
a maximum of 15 are permitted by the Development Code; and
d. APPROVE Minor Use Permit 17-09 (MUP-17-09) to permit a 3,200 square foot
fast food restaurant with drive-through service, subject to the conditions of
approval; and
e. APPROVE Minor Use Permit 17-10 (MUP-17-10) to permit a 2,800 square foot
fast food restaurant with drive-through service, subject to the conditions of
approval, and
4.1
Packet Pg. 9
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
f. APPROVE Minor Use Permit 17-11 (MUP-17-11) to exceed the City’s parking
requirement by more than five percent.
3. ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution 19-09 recommending City Council approval
of, ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, MUP-17-09, MUP-17-10 and
MUP-17-11, subject to Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval set forth in the case
record.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The Luiseno Village Project is located on Ramona Expressway, extending between Main Street
and Donna Way. The property is 9.4 acres of Vacant Land.
The Project includes the following discretionary approvals:
CZ-17-05 to change the Zone from CN Commercial Neighborhood to CG – Commercial
General.
SPDR-17-17 for the review of the overall site plan and the design of a 14,583 square foot
building.
CUP-17-09 to permit a service station with a convenience store to have an off-sale beer
and wine license.
VAR-17-05 to allow 24 fuel pumps at a single station where a maximum of 15 are
permitted by the Development Code.
MUP-17-09 to permit a fast food restaurant with a drive-through service.
MUP-17-10 to permit a fast food restaurant with a drive-through service.
MUP-17-11 to exceed the City’s parking requirement by more than five percent.
LOCATION/SURROUNDING LAND USES:
Land Use General Plan Zoning
North Vacant (north of East
Main Street)
CC – Community
Commercial and LDR –
Low Density Residential
CG – General Commercial
and RL – Residential,
Low Density
South
Soboba Indian Health
Clinic, EMWD property,
and vacant parcels
CC – Community
Commercial
CN – Commercial
Neighborhood
East
EMWD recharge facilities
(east of Ramona
Expressway)
CC – Community
Commercial
CN – Commercial
Neighborhood
West Single-family residential LDR – Low Density
Residential
RL – Residential,
Low Density
The Location, General Plan, and Zoning Maps are included as Attachments 4, 5, and 6
respectively.
4.1
Packet Pg. 10
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
BACKGROUND:
The site is vacant and covered with weedy grassland. The project site was historically used for
agriculture but has been fallow and vacant for over 20 years. It has been mowed and possibly
disked occasionally for weed control. The topography is generally flat with a slight slope down
to the northwest. Site elevation ranges from 1,592 to 1,600 feet above mean sea level (MSL).
Ramona Expressway and Main Street are elevated above the site near the intersection of these
two streets. The site consists of four parcels and seven assessor parcel numbers. To facilitate
the project, the has been conditioned for a Lot Line Adjustment to reconfigure the existing
parcel lines to be consistent with the proposed development project.
DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS:
Change of Zone ZC-17-05
The General Plan Land Use Designation for the site is Community Commercial. The Community
Commercial land use designation provides for a variety of retail and service-oriented business
activities at various intensities to serve the local community and population, as well as the
broader market area. The project does not include a proposed change to the General Plan. The
project includes the request for a zone change from Commercial Neighborhood (CN) to
Commercial General (CG). The CN zone is applied to areas appropriate for providing small-
scale retail and personal service uses for the local population living in adjacent residential
neighborhoods. However, the Project includes a service station, which is not allowed in the CN
zone. Therefore, a zone change is required the proposed Project.
The CG zone is applied to areas appropriate for general commercial and daily shopping needs of
a broad market area. The CG zone may allow a wide range of retail sales and business,
professional, and personal services that are accessible to transit corridors. The project site is
adjacent to Ramona Expressway, a major transit corridor which make which makes the site
appropriate for general commercial and daily shopping uses. In addition, the General Plan
denotes that the CG zone is clearly compatible with the Community Commercial land use
designation of the General Plan.
In April 2019, the City Council approved the KPC Promenade Development (“KPC”) located
north of the subject site. The KPC project included a General Plan Amendment from Low
Density Residential to Community Commercial and associated Rezone from Low Density
Residential to Commercial General to facilitate the construction of a new 120-room hotel, 114-
unit senior housing project, and 155,200 square feet of commercial development for retail,
restaurant and medical office uses. The proposed Change of Zone would apply the same zoning
designation as the KPC project.
4.1
Packet Pg. 11
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Site Plan Design Review (SPDR-17-17)
Under SPDR-17-17, the City will ensure that the Project respects the physical environmental
characteristics of the property, provides safe and convenient access and circulation for
pedestrians and vehicles, provides high quality design practices, minimizes, or eliminates
negative or undesirable visual impacts, provides for adequate dedication of land for public
purposes and provides needed public infrastructure.
Site Plan
Parcel 1
The 14,583 square foot multi-tenant retail building is located on approximately 3 acres in the
northwest corner of the project site. The building will include up to 10 individual tenant spaces
ranging from 1,200 to 2,261 square feet each. Specialty retail and restaurants are envisioned for
this proposed building. The Development Code requires 81 parking spaces in this portion of the
project and the Project proposes 95 spaces, which includes 5 bus parking spaces. The trash
enclosure is proposed in the parking area east of the proposed building and the residential
development, a design feature that will reduce noise impacts to the existing homes to the west.
The proposed retail building has a contemporary design. Cement plaster walls with three varying
earth tone shades make up the upper portions of the building. The lower portion of the building
will consist of stone veneer (El Dorado Stone). The design of the building provides varying
heights with column features and awnings to create visual interest. The building also in cludes
decorative wood brackets and wood trellis features. The primary focal point of the building is at
the center of the building where the parapet extends higher than the majority of the building with
siding below. The building also features an enhanced north elevation with an extended pyramid
roof, with flat tile. All roof mounted equipment is proposed below the parapet and is completely
screened.
Parcel 2
The 9,360 square foot multi-tenant retail building and 2,800 square foot restaurant with drive
through service are located on 3 acres in the southwest portion of the project. The multi-tenant
building is also expected to be utilized for specialty retail and quick-serve restaurants. This
portion of the project requires 100 parking spaces and 101 spaces are proposed. The trash
enclosure is also proposed in the parking area east of the proposed building and the residential
development.
Building elevations have not been submitted for the building at this time. As conditioned, a Site
Plan and Design Review application will be required to ensure the building is architecturally
compatible with the rest of the center prior to issuance of building permits.
Both retail buildings proposed on parcel 1 and 2 have been setback from the residential
development west of the site by 50 feet, which includes a 15 foot landscaped area, and drive aisle
4.1
Packet Pg. 12
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
with a loading zone. This project design help reduce noise and lighting impacts on the adjacent
residences.
Parcel 8
The service station with a 3,048 square foot convenience store, a 1,105 square foot car wash, and
24 fuel pumps is located on 2 acres on the northeast portion of the project site. The carwash
location is proposed to be adjacent to the convenience store on the easternmost portion of the
site, which is a project design feature to reduce noise impact on the residential neighborhood
west of the project site. The fuel pumps are located west of the proposed convenience store,
adjacent to the primary access driveways. The Development Code requires the service station to
include 16 parking spaces and 18 spaces are proposed.
Parcel 9
The 3,200-square-foot-restaurant with drive-through service is proposed on the 1.4 acres on the
southeast portion of the project site. This Development Code requires 50 parking spaces and 55
spaces are proposed.
Access
Site access would be provided by one right-in/out-only driveway on Main Street, one right-
in/out-only driveway on Ramona Expressway, and one full access driveway on Donna Way. A
north-south aligned access driveway would be developed that would connect Main Street to
Donna Way. This driveway bifurcates the site, separating the retail building and the 2,800 square
foot restaurant with drive through service, from the service station and the 3,200 square foot
restaurant with drive through service. This access also connects with the driveway off of Ramona
Expressway near the central portion of the site.
Street Improvements
The Project would make improvements to Ramona Expressway and Main Street consistent with
the General Plan and Landscape Design Guidelines. Ramona Expressway will be widened to the
planned roadway width along the property frontage. Improvements include southbound right-
turn lanes at the project driveway and Donna Way, and re-striping and signage to provide an
additional southbound through lane.
A traffic signal will be installed at the intersection of Ramona Expressway and Donna Way.
Other improvements at this intersection include removing a portion of the Ramona Expressway
median to allow full access to Donna Way and to provide a northbound left-turn lane. The
Project will modify existing street signage and striping on the property frontage of Main Street.
Other roadway work would include curb cuts for the driveways, and connections to underground
utility lines in the roadways.
4.1
Packet Pg. 13
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Project Standards
The design of the Project has been compared against City standards as noted below.
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE CG ZONE
Required/
Permitted Parcel 1 Parcel 2 Parcel 8 Parcel 9
Parcel Area (Net)
Minimum
5,000 sq. ft.
(12,000 sq. ft. for
a Drive-Through)
132,637 sq. ft. 132,018 sq. ft. 86,281 sq. ft. 61,122 sq. ft.
Parcel Width
50 ft.
(100 sq. ft. for a
Drive-Through &
Service Station)
330 ft. 575 ft. 240 ft. 250 ft.
Parcel Depth 100 ft. 330 ft. 250 ft. 255 ft. 250 ft.
FAR (Maximum) .40 .11 .09 .05 .05
Building Size Varies 14,583 sq. ft. 12,160 sq. ft. 4,153 sq. ft. 3,200 sq. ft.
Building Height 45 ft. 32.5 ft. Specific plans have not been submitted.
Building height will not exceed 45 ft.
Impervious Surface
(Max) 85% 80% 69% 69% 83%
Structure/Lot Coverage
(Max) 50% 12% 10% 13% 6%
Setbacks
Street Setback
Ramona Expressway
12-foot parkway
8-foot walk
25-foot scenic
25 ft.
Scenic n/a n/a 25 ft. 34 ft.
Main Street
6-foot parkway
6-foot walk
12-foot landscape
12 ft.
Landscape 15 ft. n/a 15 ft. n/a
Side Building Interior Setback
Abutting Non-
Residential 0 ft. 21 ft. 16 ft. 23 ft. 36 ft.
Abutting Residential 10 ft. n/a n/a n/a n/a
Side Building Street
Setback 10 ft. 62 ft. 72 ft. 34 ft. 28 ft.
Rear Building Setback
Abutting Non-
Residential 0 ft. n/a n/a 65 ft. 99 ft.
Abutting Residential 15 ft. 15-20 ft. 15-20 ft. n/a n/a
4.1
Packet Pg. 14
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Parking
A total of 269 parking stalls are envisioned for the entire four parcels. This would include an
estimated 13 disabled parking stalls.
PARKING ANALYSIS
Ratio
(Gross Floor Area) Calculation Required Provided
Parcel 1
Retail – 1:250 of GFA & 1:300 for Outdoor Display
Areas 12,396/250 50
95
Restaurant – 1:200 for first 2,000 sq. ft. then 1:60 for
anything over 2,000 sq. ft. and 1/50 for patio areas
over 15% of GFA and 1/50 for patio areas over 15%
of GFA
2,000/200 +
187/60 +
900/50
13
Total Parcel 1 81
Parcel 2
Retail – 1:250 of GFA & 1:300 for Outdoor Display
Areas 7,956/250 32
101
Restaurant – 1:200 for first 2,000 sq. ft. then 1:60 for
anything over 2,000 sq. ft. and 1/50 for patio areas
over 15% of GFA
1,404/200 +
900/50 25
Fast Food w/Drive-Through – 1:200 for first 2,000
sq. ft. then 1:60 for anything over 2,000 sq. ft. and
1/50 for patio areas over 15% of GFA
2,000/200 +
800/60 +
1,000/50
43
Total Parcel 2 100
Parcel 8
Convenience Store – 1:225 – plus 1 space for each
employee on duty during heaviest traffic 8-hour shift
3,048/225 +
4 employees 18
18
Total Parcel 8 18
Parcel 9
Fast Food Drive-Through – 1:200 for first 2,000 sq.
ft. then 1:60 for anything over 2,000 sq. ft.
2000/200 +
1,200/60 +
1,000/50
50 55
Total Parcel 9 50
The above spaces need to include the following:
ADA Stalls
1 – 25 = 1
26 – 50 = 2
51 – 75 = 3
76 – 100 = 4
Parcel 1 = 4
Parcel 2 = 4
Parcel 8 = 1
Parcel 9 = 2
Parcel 1 = 4
Parcel 2 = 5
Parcel 8 = 2
Parcel 9 = 2
4.1
Packet Pg. 15
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
PARKING ANALYSIS
Ratio
(Gross Floor Area) Calculation Required Provided
Bicycle Parking – 10% of required parking spaces –
17.330.110 10%
Parcel 1 = 8
Parcel 2 = 10
Parcel 8 = 2
Parcel 9 = 5
Parcel 1 = 11
Parcel 2 = 11
Parcel 8 = 2
Parcel 9 = 6
Cal Green 5.106.4.1.1 – Short term bicycle
parking – 5% of new visitor parking spaces being
added
5%
Parcel 1 = 4
Parcel 2 = 5
Parcel 8 = 1
Parcel 9 = 3
Parcel 1 = 6
Parcel 2 = 6
Parcel 8 = 2
Parcel 9 = 4
Cal Green 5.106.4.1.2 – Long Term bicycle
parking – when 10 or more occupants
5% of employee
parking spaces
Parcel 1 = 5
Parcel 2 = 5
Parcel 8 = 0
Parcel 9 = 2
Parcel 1 = 5
Parcel 2 = 5
Parcel 8 = 0
Parcel 9 = 2
Low-Emitting, Fuel Efficient and
Carpool/Vanpool Vehicles – Cal Green 5.106.5.2 –
when 10 or more stalls added
0 – 9 = 0
10 – 25 = 1
26 – 50 = 3
51 – 75 = 6
76 – 100 = 8
Parcel 1 = 8
Parcel 2 = 8
Parcel 8 = 1
Parcel 9 = 3
Parcel 1 = 8
Parcel 2 = 11
Parcel 8 = 1
Parcel 9 = 6
Conditional Use Permit (CUP-17-09) – Convenience Store with Off-Sale Beer and Wine Sales
Conditional Use Permit, CUP-17-09, is required to permit a service station with a convenience
market with off-sale alcohol sales under a Type 20 Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) license.
The service station also includes 24 fuel pumps and a 1,105 square foot car wash. The store will
operate between 24-hours a day, seven days a week.
Variance (VAR-17-05)
As previously discussed, this Project requires one variance to allow 24 pump where a maximum
15 are permitted by the Development Code. As previously mentioned, the site is adjacent to
Ramona Expressway a major transit corridor that provides access to the Soboba Casino and
Resort. The proposed service station is expected to receive considerable amounts of traffic from
the resort and casino, as it is a major entertainment attraction in the San Jacinto Valley. In
addition, the site is twice the minimum size required for service stations, and is expected to
include dedicated diesel fuel pumps for buses, trucks, and recreational vehicles.
Minor Use Permit (MUP-17-09) – Fast Food Restaurant with a Drive Through
This MUP is for the fast food restaurant with the Drive-Through lane on Parcel 2. As designed,
the site meets all requirements for the use. Once a tenant has been secured, architectural
renderings and a site plan in compliance with the conceptual design shown under this Project
will be required for review and approval.
4.1
Packet Pg. 16
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Minor Use Permit (MUP-17-10) – Fast Food Restaurant with a Drive Through
This MUP is for a Retail building with two tenants where one of the tenants will have a Drive-
Through lane on Parcel 3. As designed, the site meets all requirements for the use. Once tenants
have been secured, architectural renderings and a site plan in compliance with the conceptual
design shown under this Project will be required for staff review and approval.
Minor Use Permit (MUP-17-11) –Excess Parking
The project includes a Minor Use Permit to allow the development to exceed the required
parking spaces by more than 5 percent. The applicant is requesting to exceed the required
parking spaces in order to allow flexibility of future tenants of the retail buildings. Parking
requirements for retail uses are required at a ratio of 1 space per 250 square feet, while
restaurants parking requirements are required at a ratio of 1 space per 200 square feet and 1
space per 50 square feet of outdoor seating. The site plan estimates that 15% of the space would
be utilized by restaurants, which could include outdoor seating. The additional spaces would
allow the development to include additional restaurants and still meet the parking demands.
Further, the additional parking spaces will reduce parking limitations for the applicant, which
could potentially help secure quick serve restaurant chains that have stringent parking
requirements.
PUBLIC NOTICE AND COMMENTS:
The environmental review (Initial Study) and public hearing for this Project were advertised on
August 16, 2019, opening the public comment period with comments due by September 16,
2019. While the comment period extends beyond the Planning Commission Public Hearing, the
project includes a rezone which requires City Council approval. As such, the Planning
Commission will be making a recommendation on the project, but will not be the approval
authority. No comments have been received at the time this report was written.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:
The City of San Jacinto is the lead agency on the proposed Project and has reviewed all
submitted drafts, technical studies, and reports. An Initial Study was prepared for the proposed
project to evaluate potential impacts on the environment as required by the California
Environmental Quality Act. The initial study reflects the City’s independent judgment, including
reliance on applicable technical personnel and consultants with other departments and review of
all technical sub consultant reports. The following are details regarding a few of the key topics
evaluated in the Initial Study.
4.1
Packet Pg. 17
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Biological Resources
The subject property is located within a Criteria Area of the Western Riverside County Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). As such, the Project must comply with the
requirements of the MSHCP, which includes payment of the MSHCP Development Mitigation
Fee. The Criteria Area for the project includes Criteria Cell 3098 and 3099. The MSHCP
determined that conservation of grassland habitat is required within these cells, which includes
5% to 15% southeastern portion of the Cell. The acreage that needs to be conserved in this area
will therefore range from 8 to 24 acres. The project site is located within the southeast portion of
Criteria Cell 3098 which is the area described for Conservation.
Because the Project would develop the entire project site, the Criteria of the MSHCP must be
modified via a Criteria Refinement. To meet the Reserve Assembly goals of the MSHCP, the
applicant has identified an 11.6-acre Replacement Site. The Replacement Site proposed to be
conserved as part of the Criteria Refinement is located northwest of the Soboba Springs Country
Club, south of Soboba Road, and adjacent to existing conserved lands. The Replacement Site is
located within portions of a different Criteria Cells that were not identified for conservation
within the MSHCP. Therefore, conservation of the Replacement Site would contribute lands not
already called out for conservation.
The proposed Criteria Refinement will result in approximately 11.6 acres of higher quality
habitat. In addition, the total acreage being conserved is greater than the total area being removed
for development (approximately 11.6 acres to be conserved versus approximately 9.5 acres
proposed for development).
The Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) determined, and the
CDFW and USFWS have agreed, that the proposed Criteria Refinement would result in
equivalent or superior biological value and that the Criteria Refinement is consistent with the
MSHCP.
Burrowing Owl
The entire project site is within the MSHCP designated survey area for the burrowing owl.
Habitat for burrowing owl was assessed over the entire project site. Surveys conducted in
accordance with MSHCP’s Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions were conducted in 2017 and
2019. No potential burrows and no sign of burrowing owls were observed on the project site.
However, burrowing owls were observed north of Main Street in 2017 indicating that the project
site could be used for foraging by burrowing owl or could get colonized in the future. Because
the site has the potential to support burrowing owls in the future, the MSHCP requires that pre-
construction surveys be conducted prior to disturbance of the site. Therefore, a mitigation
measure is recommended for compliance with the MSHCP burrowing owl requirements.
4.1
Packet Pg. 18
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Noise
Noise from construction and operational activities would add to the existing noise environment
of the project site and immediate vicinity. Sensitive receptors located near the project site could
be exposed to project related noise. The closest sensitive receptors are residents located w est of
the project site. A six-foot high masonry wall currently separates the residential development
from the project site, and the project design includes a 50 foot building setback from the western
project boundary.
A noise study was prepared for the project which assessed all potential noise impacts from the
project, including the proposed car wash, drive-through restaurants, deliveries and trash trucks,
and the HVAC systems. The project design was instrumental in reducing potential impacts, by
placing the car wash adjacent to Ramona which is more than 500 feet from the existing
residential. Mitigation measure have been identified to reduce impacts from the project to a less
than significant level. The measures include HVAC shielding, idling restrictions, and
construction limitations.
Traffic
A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared for the project, which analyzed the forecast traffic
conditions associated with the Project. The study evaluated seven intersections that with the
project would operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS D or better) during the peak hours
under Cumulative and Cumulative with Project conditions with the following exceptions:
1. East Main Street / Hewitt Street – PM peak hour, LOS F.
2. Ramona Expressway / East Main Street-Lake Park Drive – PM peak hour, LOS F.
Because these intersections do not operate at an acceptable level of service, the addition of
Project-related traffic would result in a significant impact and requires mitigation. Therefore,
mitigation measures which include a fair share contribution to a new traffic signal at Main Street
and Hewitt Street and restriping eastbound lanes on Ramona Expressway are required.
Mitigated Negative Declaration
Based upon the information contained in the Initial Study and pursuant to the requirements of
CEQA; it has been determined that this Project, with the incorporation of mitigation measures,
will not have a significant impact on the environment. The mitigation measures required to
reduce or mitigate the impacts of this Project on the environment are included in the Project
design and/or the Mitigation Monitoring Program and will be included as part of the Mitigated
Negative Declaration for this Project. As a result, it is recommended that the Planning
Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this
Project.
4.1
Packet Pg. 19
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact to the General Fund since all project costs are borne by the applicant.
CONCLUSION:
As designed and conditioned, the Project will be a welcome addition along the Ramona
Expressway corridor and the City. The Project offers the constituents of the City another choice
for gasoline and food and retail sales, promoting job opportunities and local buying power.
ATTACHMENTS:
01 - Findings of Fact
02 - Conditions of Approval
03 - PC Resolution 19-09
04 - Location Map
05 - General Plan Land Use Map
06 - Zoning Map
07 - Project Plans
08 - Conceptual Grading Plan
09 - Signing and Striping Plans
10 - Initial Study
11 - Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program
4.1
Packet Pg. 20
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
CZ 17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP- 17-09,
MUP 17-09, MUP 17-10, MUP 17-11 & VAR 17-05
CHANGE OF ZONE FINDINGS OF FACT (CZ-17-05):
1. The proposed Zoning Map amendment is consistent with the General Plan
and applicable specific plan;
The General Plan Land Use Designation is Community Commercial. The project
proposes to change the zoning on the project site to Commercial General. Table
LU-1 of the General Plan (General Plan and Zoning Consistency Matrix) shows
the Commercial General zone is clearly compatible with the Community
Commercial General Plan Designation. The project is not located within a Specific
Plan.
2. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest,
health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City;
The proposed Change of Zone promotes the growth of the City consistent with the
City’s General Plan. The Change of Zone will facilitate commercial development
along Ramona Expressway and Main Street, as envisioned by the General Plan.
As the project is conditioned, it will not adversely affect the public convenience,
health, interest, safety or general welfare.
3. The affected site is physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape,
size, operation characteristics, and the provision of public services and
utilities (e.g., fire protection, police protection, potable water, schools, solid
waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection,
treatment, and disposal, etc.), to ensure that the requested zoning
designation and the proposed or anticipated uses and/or development will
not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the property or
improvements in the vicinity in which the property is located;
The site is physically suitable for development, as it is of adequately sized property
with an adequate width to depth ratio for commercia l development. The property
is able to utilize, Main Street, Ramona Expressway and Donna Way for ingress
and egress. Adequate infrastructure exists to support the project site and the
proposed land uses will be conditioned to ensure that their design accommodates
and provides for public and emergency vehicles including solid waste haulers, City
crews, and other service and utility providers, as not to constitute a hazard.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: 01 - Findings of Fact (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
SITE PLAN DESIGN REVIEW PERMIT FINDINGS OF FACT (SPDR-17-17):
The proposed Project will:
1. Be allowed within the subject zone;
The proposed commercial center will be consistent with the proposed CG –
Commercial General Zone and the CC – Community Commercial General Plan
Land Use designation, with the adoption of the proposed Change of Zone.
2. Be in compliance with all the applicable criteria below:
a. Compliance with 17.630 – Site Plan and Design Review of the
Development Code, and all other applicable City regulations and
policies;
As noted in the staff report and as conditioned, the Project will comply with
Chapter 17.630 of the Development Code. (See Table 2 of the staff report)
b. Efficient site layout and design;
As designed the Project provides an efficient site layout and desig n with
three points of access and an internal circulation system that serves all
proposed uses in the project.
c. Compatibility with neighboring properties and developments;
The Project provides compatibility with neighboring properties as the
proposed project complies with all required setbacks and provides
landscape buffers along all borders of the project site. In addition, the
proposed site plan includes a 50 foot building setback from the residential
uses located west of the project site to reduce potential impacts.
d. Efficiency and safety of public access and parking;
The Project provides an efficient site layout and design with three points of
access and an internal circulation system that provides access to Ramona
Expressway, Main Street, and Donna Way. Therefore, the Project provides
efficient and safe public access and parking. In addition, the proposed
commercial uses have dedicated pedestrian access, separate from the
vehicular drive aisles.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: 01 - Findings of Fact (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
e. The arrangement and relationship of proposed structures and signs
to one another and to other developments in the vicinity and whether
the relationship is harmonious and based on good standards of
design;
Overall, the Project design provides a good relationship and arrangement
of the proposed structures to one another and developments in the vicinity.
The design features and colors are compatible with existing surrounding
residential developments.
f. The compatibility in scale and aesthetic treatment of proposed
structures with public areas;
The site and building design provide a compatible scale and aesthetic
treatment for the public areas as 23% of the project site will include
landscaping, the majority of which is adjacent to the Ramona Expressway,
Main Street, and Donna Way. In addition, the design of the building
provides varying heights with column features and awnings to create visual
interest. The building also includes decorative wood brackets and wood
trellis features. Cement plaster finish painted with three varying earth tones,
which will complement the adjacent residential structures.
g. The adequacy of proposed driveways, landscaping, parking spaces,
potential on-site and off-site parking and traffic impacts and other
potential impacts on the environment;
The City Engineer and Traffic Engineer have reviewed the site design and
Traffic Impact Analysis and have determined that as conditioned the Project
will provide for safe vehicular and pedestrian movements to and from the
site. Further, as noted in the staff report the Project meets the required
landscaping and parking requirements. All other potential environmental
impacts have been thoroughly analyzed in the Initial Study and as
mitigated/conditioned the Project will have less than significant
environmental impacts.
h. Appropriate open space and use of water-efficient landscaping;
The Project design provides adequate open space in the form of on -site
landscaping. As conditioned, the Project will provide landscaping in
conformance with Chapter 17.325 – Water Efficient Landscaping and
Irrigation in conformance with State law.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: 01 - Findings of Fact (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
i. Consistency with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan;
The CC –General Plan land use designation provides for a variety of retail
and service-oriented business activities, including office uses, at various
intensities to serve the local community and population, as well as the
broader market area. The Project would allow the development of a
commercial retail center, which is consistent with the General Plan land use
designation. The project is not located within a Specific Plan.
j. Consistency with any adopted design guidelines/standards.
As conditioned, the Project will be consistent with the City’s Landscape
Design Guidelines, including, but not limited to, the special landscaping
setback requirements along Ramona Expressway.
3. Be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood, in terms of the
structure(s) general appearance;
As conditioned, the Project will be compatible with the residential neighborhood
west of the site and the institutional land use along the Ramona Expressway as
the proposed building will utilize walls with cement plaster painted with varying
earth tones. In addition, the site complies with the building setback requirements
of the development code, which include landscaping to soften the development.
4. Not be detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City.
The Project promotes the growth of the City consistent with the City’s Development
Code and General Plan.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND ALCOHOL SALES FINDINGS OF FACT (CUP-17-
09):
1. The proposed use will not be detrimental to surrounding properties and
neighborhoods including ensuring that the use does not contribute to
loitering, public drunkenness, noise, obstructing pedestrian and vehicular
traffic, parking, crime, interference with pedestrian corridors used by
children, defacement, and damage to structures;
As designed and conditioned, the Project will not be detrimental to surrounding
properties and the neighborhood. The convenience store is located at the
southwest corner of Ramona Expressway and Main Street, which is the furthest
portion on the site from existing residential uses. Conditions of Approval include
requirements to address loitering, noise, and property maintenance.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: 01 - Findings of Fact (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
2. The proposed use will not adversely impact the suitability of adjacent
commercially zoned properties for commercial uses;
The proposed use will not adversely impact the suitability of adjacent commercially
zoned properties for commercial uses as the proposed service station with
convenience store is compatible with the planned commercial land uses on
Ramona Expressway
3. The proposed use will not adversely affec t the welfare of residents in the
area or result in an undue concentration in the neighborhood of
establishments dispensing alcoholic beverages, including beer and wine.
For purposes of this subparagraph, “undue concentration” shall be as
defined in the Business and Professions Code Section 23958.4; and
Excerpt of Business and Professions Code Section 23958.4 – For purposes of
Section 23958, “undue concentration” means the case in which the applicant
premises for an original or premises-to-premises transfer of any retail license are
located in an area where any of the following conditions exist:
(1) The applicant premises are located in a crime reporting district that has a 20
percent greater number of reported crimes, as defined in subdivision (c), than the
average number of reported crimes as determined from all crime reporting districts
within the jurisdiction of the local law enforcement agency.
(2) As to on-sale retail license applications, the ratio of on -sale retail licenses to
population in the census tract or census division in which the applicant premises
are located exceeds the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the county
in which the applicant premises are located. – Not Applicable to this Project
(3) As to off-sale retail license applications, the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to
population in the census tract or census division in which the applicant premises
are located exceeds the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the county
in which the applicant premises are located.
The proposed use will not adversely affect the welfare of residents in the area or
result in an undue concentration in the neighborhood of establishments dispensing
alcoholic beverages, including beer and wine. The City’s Police Department does
not keep crime statistics by Census Tracts, so the City is unable to determine if
crime in this Census Tract is any greater than crime in other Census Tracts within
the City. The Census Tract is not over concentrated with off-site sales licenses,
having zero existing licenses where one license is permitted.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: 01 - Findings of Fact (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable
specific plan;
The General Plan Land Use Designation is Community Commercial, which
provides for a variety of retail and service-oriented business activities, including
office uses, at various intensities to serve the local community and population, as
well as the broader market area. The service station with convenience store is
consistent with the General Plan land use designation. The project is not located
within a Specific Plan.
5. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zone and complies with
all other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the Municipal
Code;
The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zone and complies with all other
applicable provisions of this Development Code and the Municipal Code except
that the service station exceeds the maximum number of fuel dispensers allowed
by the Development Code (See Variance Findings below). The proposed service
station with convenience store is consistent with the proposed CG Zone and CC
General Plan land use designations.
6. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed
activity will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the
vicinity;
The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity
will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. The
Project is physically suitable for the proposed Project as the site is 2 acres, with
adequate width and depth, and the design of the commercial center under the
SPDR utilizes driveways of the proposed Project on Ramona Expressway, Main
Street and Donna Way. The proposed service station is planned to be adjacent
to retail spaces and a fast food restaurant with drive through service, which are
complimentary uses.
7. The site is physically suitable in terms of:
a. Its design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics of the
proposed use;
The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed
activity will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the
vicinity. The Project is physically suitable for the proposed Project as the
site is 2 acres with adequate width and depth to accommodate the
proposed use and traffic circulation.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: 01 - Findings of Fact (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
b. The provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical)
access;
The site is designed to provide adequate access for emergency vehicles as
the site plan has been reviewed by the Police and Fire Departments, and
as conditioned, meets their requirements.
c. Public protection services (e.g., fire protection, police protection,
etc.); and
The Project is consistent with the General Plan which helps to ensure that
public protection services are available. In addition, the site plan has been
reviewed by the Police and Fire Departments, and as conditioned, meets
their requirements.
d. The provision of utilities (e.g., potable water, schools, solid waste
collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection,
treatment, and disposal, etc.).
The Project will be required to connect to all required utilities and as
conditioned will be providing the required trash enclosures for solid waste
disposal.
8. The measure of site suitability shall be required to ensure that the type,
density, and intensity of use being proposed will not adversely affect the
public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, constitute a
nuisance, or be materially injurious to the improvements, persons, property,
or uses in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located; and
The Project site is physically suitable for the proposed Project as the development
has adhere to the required setbacks and have adequate parking. The project will
have Floor Area Ratio (0.06) that is well below the maximum ratio allowed by the
Development Code (0.40). Access to the proposed project is provided by Ramona
Expressway, Main Street, and Donna Way. The Project will be a welcome addition
providing needed services to the neighborhood and the City. As conditioned, the
Project will not adversely affect the public convenience, health, interest, safety or
general welfare.
9. The applicant agrees in writing to comply with any and all of the conditions
imposed by the Approving Authority in the approval of the Conditional Use
Permit.
The applicant is required to sign the conditions of approval reflecting their
agreement with the conditions.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: 01 - Findings of Fact (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
MINOR USE PERMITS (MUP-17-09 and MUP-17-10) FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable
specific plan.
The proposed uses are consistent with the General Plan. The CC General Plan
land use designation provides for a variety of retail and service-oriented business
activities, including office uses, at various intensities to serve the local community
and population, as well as the broader market area. Therefore, a fast food
restaurant with a drive-through service is consistent with the General Plan land
use designation. The site is not located within a Specific Plan.
2. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zone and complies with
all other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the Municipal
Code.
The proposed uses are allowed within the proposed zone, with the adoption of
Change of Zone 17-05 and complies with all other applicable provisions of this
Development Code and the Municipal Code, as demonstrated in Table 2 of the
staff report. The proposed fast-food restaurants with drive-through service are
consistent with the CG Zone, as they are listed as an allowed use, subject to a
MUP.
3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed
activity will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the
vicinity.
The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity
will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. The Project
is physically suitable for the proposed Project as the site is generally flat, and the
design of the commercial center under the SPDR planned for the proposed uses.
4. The site is physically suitable in terms of:
a. Its design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics of the
proposed use;
The Project site is physically suitable for the proposed Project as the site is
9.4 acres that is generally flat, with adequate width and depth. In addition,
the site has access from three driveways, served by Ramona Expressway,
Main Street, and Donna Way. The Project will be a welcome addition to the
eastern portion of the city, providing needed services to the neighborhood
and the City. As conditioned, the Project will not adversely affect the public
convenience, health, interest, safety or general welfare.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: 01 - Findings of Fact (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
b. The provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical)
access;
The site is designed to provide adequate access for emergency vehicles.
Furthermore, the site plan has been reviewed by the Police and Fire
Departments, and as conditioned, meets their requirements.
c. Public protection services (e.g., fire protection, police protection,
etc.); and
The Project is consistent with the General Plan which helps to ensure that
public protection services are available. The site plan has been reviewed by
the Police and Fire Departments, and as conditioned, meets their
requirements.
d. The provision of utilities (e.g., potable water, schools, solid waste
collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection,
treatment, and disposal, etc.).
The Project will be connecting to all required utilities and as conditioned will
be providing the required trash enclosures for solid waste disposal.
5. The measure of site suitability shall be required to ensure that the type,
density, and intensity of use being proposed will not adversely affect the
public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, constitute a
nuisance, or be materially injurious to the improvements, persons, property,
or uses in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
The Project site is physically suitable for the proposed Project as the site is
generally flat, and the design under SPDR accommodates this use as designed.
As conditioned, the Project will not adversely affect the public convenience, health,
interest, safety or general welfare.
6. The applicant agrees in writing to comply with any and all of the conditions
imposed by the review authority in the approval of the Minor Use Permit.
The applicant is required to sign the conditions of approval reflecting their
agreement with the conditions.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: 01 - Findings of Fact (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
MINOR USE PERMITS (MUP-17-11) (EXCESS PARKING) FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable
specific plan.
The proposed uses are consistent with the General Plan. The CC General Plan
land use designation provides for a variety of retail and service -oriented business
activities, including office uses, at various intensities to serve the local community
and population, as well as the broader market area. Parking requirements for retail
uses are required at a ratio of 1 space per 250 square feet, while restaurants
parking requirements are required at a ratio of 1 space per 200 squ are feet and 1
space per 50 square feet of outdoor seating. The site plan estimates that 15% of
the retail buildings would be utilized by restaurants, which could include outdoor
seating. The additional spaces would allow the development to include addit ional
restaurants and still meet the parking demands.
2. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zone and complies with
all other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the Municipal
Code.
Parking spaces as an ancillary use to an appro ved land use are allowed in CG
zone.
3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed
activity will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the
vicinity.
The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed parking
areas are physically suitable for the proposed Project as the site is generally flat,
and structure coverage is less than 10 percent of the site. Furthermore, the
design of the commercial center under the SPDR, planned for the proposed uses.
4. The site is physically suitable in terms of:
a. Its design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics of the
proposed use;
The parking area for the proposed Project has been adequately analyzed
under the SPDR 17-17, and the project is suitable in size, location, shape
and size.
b. The provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical)
access;
This Finding is not applicable.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: 01 - Findings of Fact (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
c. Public protection services (e.g., fire protection, police protection,
etc.); and
This Finding is not applicable.
d. The provision of utilities (e.g., potable water, schools, solid waste
collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection,
treatment, and disposal, etc.).
This Finding is not applicable.
5. The measure of site suitability shall be required to ensure that the type,
density, and intensity of use being proposed will not adversely affect the
public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, constitute a
nuisance, or be materially injurious to the improvements, persons, property,
or uses in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
The Project site is physically suitable for the proposed Project as the site is
generally flat, and the design under the SPDR accommodates this use as
designed. As conditioned, the Project will not adversely affect the public
convenience, health, interest, safety or general welfare.
6. The applicant agrees in writing to comply with any and all of the conditions
imposed by the review authority in the approval of the Minor Use Permit.
The applicant is required to sign the conditions of approval reflecting thei r
agreement with the conditions.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: 01 - Findings of Fact (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
VARIANCE (VAR-17-05) (INCREASED PUMPS) FINDINGS OF FACT: To allow the
service station to exceed 15 pumps.
1. There are special circumstances applicable to the subject property (e.g.,
location, shape, size, surroundings, topography, or other physical features)
that do not apply generally to other properties in the vicinity under an
identical zoning classification;
The project site is adjacent to Ramona Expressway, a major corridor in the City
and is less than a mile from the Soboba Resort and Casino, a large entertainment
venue which includes a hotel, restaurants, gaming and conference center. The
greater majority of traffic trips entering and leaving the Resort are expected to pass
by the proposed fuel station which means that the service station is likely to have
a greater demand than other stations in the vicinity at peak hours, especially
following live concerts, and similar events.
2. Strict compliance with Development Code requirements would deprive the
subject property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and
under an identical zoning classification;
The project site well exceeds the minimum lot size for a fueling station which
typically limits the amount of pumps that can be reasonably accommodated. Unlike
more restricted sites, the project site has excellent access to public roads and
internal circulation. The increase in pumps will not result in internal conflict which
the code limit of 15 pumps is attempting to prevent. In addition city has previously
approved projects that included a variance to allow more than 15 fuel pumps for a
single service station, when the service stations are located on larger sites that
can accommodate the additional vehicle trips. Therefore, strict compliance of the
Development Code requirements would deprive the subject property of privi leges
enjoyed by other properties.
3. Approving the Variance would not constitute a grant of special privileges
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the same vicinity and
zone in which the subject property is situated; and
Approving the Variance would not constitute a grant of special privileges
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the same vicinity and zone
as the project site is twice the minimum size required for fuel stations, and the area
set aside for the proposed fuel stations is sufficient to accommodate the additional
traffic.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: 01 - Findings of Fact (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4. The requested Variance would not allow a use or activity that is not otherwise
expressly authorized by the regulations governing the subject parcel.
The requested Variances would not allow a use or activity that is not otherwise
expressly authorized by the regulations governing the subject parce l as a service
station is listed as a permitted use in the Development Code under the CG Zone,
subject to a use permit.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: 01 - Findings of Fact (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 1 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Approval Date: TBD
Effective Date: TBD
Expiration Date: TBD
PROJECT LOCATION: Southwest corner of Main Street and Ramona Expressway in the City of San Jacinto.
(APNs): 433-160-024, 027, 028, 029, 032, 033, and 034)
APPLICANT: Soboba Band of Luiseno Village
23906 Soboba Road
San Jacinto, CA 92583
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO BY: _____________________________________________________________
Applicant Date
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A proposal of the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians to construct and operate a commercial shopping center that includes a service
station with 24 fuel pumps, a 3,048 square foot convenience store with alcohol sales, and a 1,105 square foot car wash; a 14,583
square foot multi-tenant retail building; a 9,360-square-foot multi-tenant retail building; a fast-food restaurant with drive-through
service totaling 2,800 square feet; a fast-food restaurant with drive-through service totaling 3,200 square feet.
General Requirements & Information – SPDR 17-17, CUP 17-09, MUP 17-09, MUP 17-10
A) The developer/applicant or successor in interest agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City, its officials, offi cers,
agents, and employees, from any and all liability, claims, actions or proceedings that may be brought arising out of its approval
of this permit, and any approvals associated with the Project, including, without limitation, any CEQA review or approval, except
to the extent caused by the negligence of the City.
B) The approval of this Project, a commercial center, shall comply with all required standards of the Development Code.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 2 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
C) The developer/applicant or successor in interest is advised that the businesses or uses which this Project is granted cannot be
legally conducted on the subject property until all conditions of approval of this case (SPDR 17-17) have been met to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.
D) The effective date of issuance of this Project is TBD. The approval will lapse if improvements have not commenced within two
(2) years from the date upon which the approval was granted. Unless a time extension is approved by the City’s applicable
review authority. Applications for time extensions must be received prior to the expiration date.
E) All cases associated with the Project, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09, MUP-17-10, MUP-17-10, and VAR-17-05, and shall
have the same effective date and expiration date. Therefore, these cases will become null and void, if the project has not been
vested, on or before TBD (two calendar years from the effective date), unless a time extension is approved by the City’s applicable
review authority. Applications for time extensions must be received prior to the expiration date.
F) All storage and display of merchandise and supplies must be conducted within a building.
G) The Project shall fully and continually comply with all applicable conditions of approval, State, Federal and local laws in effect
at the time the permit is approved and exercised, and which may become effective and applicable thereafter. Failure to do so
will be grounds for Code Enforcement actions, revocation, or further legal action.
H) All plans submitted to the City shall be in substantial conformance with the plans in this approval as conditioned. This condition
applies to site plans, grading plans, landscape plans, building plans, elevations, and all other illustrations, text, or plan s
submitted to the City in connection with the Project.
I) A copy of all pages of these conditions shall be included in the construction drawing packages for grading plans, building plans,
and landscape and irrigation plans.
J) This approval may be revoked if the Project is operated or maintained in violation of any law or in a manner that constitutes a
nuisance or adversely affects the public health, safety, or welfare.
K) The City shall have the right to annually inspect the site and facilities to ensure compliance with the conditions of approva l and
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 3 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
to recover its actual costs related to such inspections from the property owner or tenant.
L) The required parking and loading features (e.g., landscaping, parking surfaces, striping, signs, etc.) shall be continuously
maintained in good condition by the person having control of the premises (e.g., lessee, owner, tenant, etc.) as follows:
• Landscaping shall be kept alive and continually maintained in compliance with Section 17.330.090 (Landscaping Standards
for Parking Areas) and Chapter 17.325 (Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation).
• Parking surfaces shall be kept free of holes and substantial deterioration.
• Striping shall be visible.
• Signs shall be kept in place, legible, and continually maintained.
• Parked vehicles shall not extend over a property line or into a public right-of-way.
• All parking and drive aisles shall be screened from the public right-of-way with a landscape hedge or decorative wall, as
reviewed and approved by the Planning and Community Development Director.
M) Fire Department apparatus access shall be provided to within 150 feet to of all portions of all buildings. Fire apparatus roads
shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet. Driveway loops, fire apparatus access lanes and entrance curb radius
should be designed to adequately allow access of emergency fire vehicles. Ref. CFC Sections 503.1.1 and 503.2.1 as amended
by the City of San Jacinto.
N) All required Fire Department vehicle access roads shall be maintained in a passable condition at all times for emergency Fire
Department use. Gates or other obstructions shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to construction.
O) For CFD Annexation - Developer will ensure that funds are available for maintenance of public improvements, in the event
that improvements are completed, and ready for City takeover, PRIOR to levy collection.
P) For CFD Annexation - The first installment of collected assessments is paid to the City in January of each year. In the
event that takeover is requested before the first installment is paid to the City, the Developer will either:
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 4 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Pay an advancement of funds for the months included from takeover to collection (amount to be set by cost estimate
at annexation) OR
Continue to maintain improvements until City has acquired enough funds to sustain maintenance or until first
assessment installment is received, whichever is first.
Q) For CFD Annexation - Upon acceptance and City take-over, developer will ensure that a minimum of one -year warranty
is in place for landscape, irrigation, basin integrity, inclusive pumps and mechanical equipment used for the maintenance
of the improvements taken over.
R) If not already completed, the developer/applicant or successor in interest shall submit a single check to the City, made
payable to the Riverside County Clerk, in the amount of $2,330.75, for the payment of State Fish and Game Fees
($2,280.75) and the County Recorder handling fee ($50.00) for filing of the Notice of Determination (NOD). In accordance
with Section 711.4 of the State Fish and Game Code, no project shall be operative, vested, or fina l until the filing fees
have been paid. The City will record the NOD and provide a copy of the NOD and receipt to the applicant.
S) Grading shall not be commenced, and no structures shall be altered, enlarged, erected, moved, demolished, or rebuilt
subject to the provisions of Chapter 17.630 – Site Plan and Design Review of the Development Code, except in
compliance with the approved Project and the conditions imposed on the review.
T) Grading and public improvements shall be installed in accordance with City standards and specifications. The tops of all
graded slopes shall be at the property line
U) The project’s grading shall be in a manner to perpetuate existing natural drainage patterns. Any deviation from this,
concentration or increase in runoff, must have approval from adjacent property owners, and the City Engineer. Drainage
easements shall be obtained from affected property owners. The applicant shall accept the offsite runoff and convey to
an acceptable outlet. Emergency escape paths shall be provided for all sump conditions.
V) Prior to issuance of any permit, the developer/property owner shall secure City’s and appropriate agency’s approval of
the improvement plans.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 5 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
W) Prior to commencement of any construction or installation of fencing in public ri ght-of-way, encroachment permit shall be
obtained from the City Engineer’s office.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 6 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Conditions of Approval
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
SPDR 17-17 - Project Description: A multi-tenant retail building totaling 14,583 square feet of specialty retail, with up to 10
individual tenant spaces ranging from 1,200 to 2,261 square feet each.
Prior to Any Earthmoving Activity For SPDR 17-17
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
1) Prior to grading permit issuance the developer shall enter into a Treatment and
Disposition Agreement (TDA) with the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians to
address treatment and disposition of archaeological / cultural resources and
human remains associated with Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians that may be
uncovered or otherwise discovered during ground disturbing activities related to
the project. The TDA may establish provisions for tribal monitors, and needs to
be submitted to the Planning Division upon after it has been executed.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
2) MM BIO 1 - If construction occurs during the breeding season (February 1 to
August 31), a burrowing owl breeding bird survey following the recommended
guidelines of the MSHCP will be required within 30 days prior to construction to
determine if nesting is occurring on site.
If burrowing owl have colonized the project site, the Applicant will prepare a
Burrowing Owl Protection and Relocation Plan for approval by RCA and
CDFW.
Occupied nests will not be disturbed during the nesting season (February 1
through August 31) unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive
methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg-laying and
incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging
independently and are capable of independent survival.
If the biologist is not able to verify one of the above conditions, then no
disturbance shall occur during the breeding season within a distance
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 7 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
determined by the qualified biologist for each nest or nesting site. For the
burrowing owl, the recommended distance is a minimum of 160 feet.
Relocation of burrowing owl is subject to the above conditions and prior
coordination with RCA, CDFW and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS).
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
3) MM Bio 2 - A breeding bird survey will be required to determine if nesting is occurring
no more than five days prior to ground disturbing activities. Occupied nests will not
be disturbed during the nesting season (February 1 through August 31) unless a
qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult
birds have not begun egg-laying and incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the
occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival.
If the biologist is not able to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance
shall occur during the breeding season within a distance determined by the qualified
biologist for each nest or nesting site.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
4) MM Bio 3 - A condition shall be placed on grading permits requiring a qualified
biologist to conduct a training session for project personnel prior to grading. The
training shall include a description of the species of concern and its habitats, the
general provisions of the Endangered Species Act (Act) and the MSHCP, the need
to adhere to the provisions of the Act and the MSHCP, the penalties associated with
violating the provisions of the Act, the general measures that are being implemented
to conserve the species of concern as they relate to the project, and the access
routes to and project site boundaries within which the project activities must be
accomplished.
Water pollution and erosion control plans shall be developed and implemented
in accordance with RWQCB requirements.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 8 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
The footprint of disturbance shall be minimized to the maximum extent feasible.
Access to sites shall be via pre-existing access routes to the greatest extent
possible.
Equipment storage, fueling, and staging areas shall be located on upland sites
with minimal risks of direct drainage into riparian areas or other sensitive
habitats. These designated areas shall be located in such a manner as to
prevent any runoff from entering sensitive habitat. Necessary precautions shall
be taken to prevent the release of cement or other toxic substances into surface
waters. Project related spills of hazardous materials shall be reported to
appropriate entities including but not limited to applicable jurisdictional city,
FWS, and CDFG, RWQCB and shall be cleaned up immediately and
contaminated soils removed to approved disposal areas.
The removal of native vegetation shall be avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent practicable. Temporary impacts shall be returned to pre -
existing contours and revegetated with appropriate native species.
Exotic species that prey upon or displace target species of concern should be
permanently removed from the site to the extent feasible.
To avoid attracting predators of the species of concern, the project site shall be
kept as clean of debris as possible. All food related trash items shall be enclosed
in sealed containers and regularly removed from the site(s).
Construction employees shall strictly limit their activities, vehicles, equipment,
and construction materials to the proposed project footprint and designated
staging areas and routes of travel. The construction area(s) shall be the minimal
area necessary to complete the project and shall be specified in the construction
plans. Construction limits will be fenced with orange snow screen. Exclusion
fencing should be maintained until the completion of all construction activities.
Employees shall be instructed that their activities are restricted to the
construction areas.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 9 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
The Permittee (City of San Jacinto) shall have the right to access and inspect
any sites of approved projects including any restoration/enhancement area for
compliance with project approval conditions including these BMPs.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
5) MM BIO 4 - The following measures apply to the construction of roadway
improvements with the rights-of-way of Ramona Expressway and East Main Street
that are completed as part of the Project.
Plans for water pollution and erosion control will be prepared for work involving
the movement of earth in excess of 50 cubic yards. The plans will describe
sediment and hazardous materials control, dewatering or diversion structures,
fueling and equipment management practices, use of plant material for erosion
control. Plans will be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction.
Timing of construction activities will consider seasonal requirements for breeding
birds and migratory non-resident species. Habitat clearing will be avoided during
species active breeding season defined as March 1 to June 30.
Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented until such time soils
are determined to be successfully stabilized.
Silt fencing or other sediment trapping materials will be installed at the
downstream end of construction activities to minimize the transport of sediments
off-site.
The footprint of disturbance will be minimized to the maximum extent Feasible.
Access to sites will occur on pre-existing access routes to the greatest extent
possible.
Equipment storage, fueling and staging areas will be sited on non-sensitive
upland wildlife habitat types with minimal risk of direct discharge into riparia n
areas or other sensitive wildlife habitat types.
Exotic species removed during construction will be properly handled to prevent
sprouting or regrowth.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 10 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Training of construction personnel will be provided.
Ongoing monitoring and reporting will occur for th e duration of the construction
activity to ensure implementation of best management practices.
Active construction areas shall be watered regularly to control dust and minimize
impacts to adjacent vegetation.
All equipment maintenance, staging, and dispensing of fuel, oil, coolant, or any
other toxic substances shall occur only in designated areas within the proposed
grading limits of the project site. These designated areas shall be clearly marked
and located in such a manner as to contain run-off.
Waste, dirt, rubble, or trash shall not be deposited in the Conservation Area or
on native habitat.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
6) MM CR 1 - Should cultural/archaeological resources be encountered during ground
disturbing activities for the project, work must be halted in the area within 50 feet of
the find and a qualified archaeologist notified immediately to assess the significance
of the find. Construction activities could continue in other areas. If the discovery
proves to be significant, additional work, such as data recovery excavation, may be
warranted and would be discussed in consultation with the property owner, the City
of San Jacinto, or any other relevant regulatory agency, as appropriate.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
7) MM CR 2 - In the event of the discovery of human remains, the Riverside County
coroner shall be immediately notified. If human remains of Native American origin
are discovered during ground disturbing activities, the applicant shall comply with
the State law relating to the disposition of Native American burials that fall within the
jurisdiction of the NAHC (PRC Section 5097). According to California Health and
Safety Code, six or more human burials at one location constitute a cemetery
(Section 8100), and disturbance of Native American cemeteries is a felony (Section
7052). Section 7050.5 requires that excavation be stopped near discovered human
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 11 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
remains until the coroner can determine whether the remains are those of a Native
American. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the California
Native American Heritage Commission and the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians
shall be notified, and appropriate measures provided by State law shall be
implemented to determine the most likely living descendant(s). Disposition of the
remains shall be overseen by the most likely living descendants to determine the
most appropriate means of treating the human remains and any associated grave
artifacts.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Engineering
Department
8) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall submit three (3) copies of a
comprehensive grading plan at 40-scale for review and approval to the Engineering
Department with any required fee and one (1) copy to the Project Planner. The plan
shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, City Grading Standards,
and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved grading plan. The plan shall be drawn on 24" X 36"
Mylar by a registered civil engineer. A copy of all pages of these conditions shall be
included in the plans.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
9) Grading and public improvements shall be installed in accordance with City
standards and specifications. The tops of all graded slopes shall be at the property
line. Any graded area that remains undeveloped between phases shall be
maintained with a decomposed granite concrete mix, to prevent wind and water
erosion.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 12 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
10) The grading plan shall include the following, for Planning approval:
A. An ADA path of travel enhanced with decorative paving, stamped concrete,
pavers, or another material differentiating the walk from the asphalt parking
area as approved by Planning and Community Development Director.
B. A public sidewalk with special decorative paving accents where crossed by
driveway entrances to parking lots.
C. Parking areas surfaced with Portland-Cement Concrete paving to a minimum
4-inch thickness over native soil compacted to 95% compaction or asphalt
concrete with 2½ inch thickness over 4 inches of Class II aggregate base
compacted to 95% relative compaction, or as approved by the City Engineer.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
11) A final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted and
approved, including a project description, and identifying Best Management
Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain
system to the maximum extent practicable. The Water Quality Management Plan
shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the City’s
adopted requirements.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
12) The proposed site design BMPs selected for this project have been approved in
concept as a Master WQMP. The individual parcels shall submit Final WQMP
Addendums including plans and details providing the elevations and slopes of the
three bio-retention basins, the detention basin and other details for the proposed
structural BMPs. The Public Works Department shall review and approve the Final
WQMP document, plans and details. The property owners will also provide signed
agreements presenting shared responsibilities for the BMP maintenance.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 13 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
13) MM GEO 2 - All earthmoving during project implementation at or below 4 feet
requires full-time paleontological monitoring, as follows:
A qualified paleontologist (graduate degree and more than one year of
professional experience as a principal investigator) will be retained to provide
paleontological services. The principal paleontologist will be responsible to
implement and oversee monitoring and to maintain professional standards of
work. The principal paleontologist will report all mitigation and monitoring
activities, or related actions of the paleontological resources team to the City,
as appropriate, including discussing a reduction in monitoring from full- to part-
time after monitoring is initiated and no fossils have been identified.
A qualified paleontological monitor will perform monitoring of construction
grading and excavations that take place in the older Pleistocene sediments at
depths of 4 feet or more. The monitor will have authority to divert grading away
from exposed fossils temporarily in order to recover the fossil specimens.
Cooperation and assistance from on-site personnel will greatly assist timely
resumption of work in the area of the fossil discovery.
Discovery of fossil producing localities requires documentation including
measured stratigraphic columns and geologic samples for analysis. Any fossils
recovered that meet significance criteria will be prepared, identified, and
cataloged before donation to an appropriate repository. The Western Science
Center in Hemet, California is recommended as an appropriate repository.
The principal paleontologist retained will prepare a final report. The report will
include a list of specimens recovered, documentation of each locality,
interpretation of fossils recovered, and will include any specialists’ reports as
appendices.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 14 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Engineering
Department
14) A geotechnical engineering report shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior
to issuance of a grading permit, and all requirements identified in the report
shall be met. The report must be prepared by a California licensed geotechnical
engineer or civil engineer skilled in soils/foundation investigations and shall be
submitted for review by the Building & Safety Department prior to the issuance
of grading or building permits. All requirements identified in the report shall be
met.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Engineering
Department
15) Onsite and offsite fire hydrants shall be installed as determined by the Fire
Department.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Engineering
Department
16) The developer/property owner shall submit the following to the City Engineer for
review and approval:
Onsite Grading Plan and Erosion Control Plan – All pads shall be graded to
be a minimum of 1’ above 100-year calculated water surface elevation or
adjacent finished grade. Plans shall show the approved WDID No.
Drainage Plan, Hydrology and Hydraulic Report
Final WQMP (for reference)
Water & Sewer Plan – Fire Department and EMWD approval required prior
to City Engineer approval.
Street Improvement Plan
Traffic Signal Plans prepared by Traffic Engineer
Signing and Striping plan prepared by Traffic Engineer
Streetlight Plan prepared by a Registered Electrical Engineer per City of San
Jacinto standards. Street lights shall be LS3 – LED type.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 15 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
The project’s design shall be in compliance with EMWD, Riverside County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Riverside County, Caltrans,
City of San Jacinto and ADA most recent standards, criteria and
requirements and in effect at the time of construction and coordinated with
approved plans for adjacent developments.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Engineering
Department
17) The developer/property owner shall provide water and sewer service to this
project in accordance with the requirements of the appropriate utility purveyors.
This project is within City of San Jacinto sewer service area and Eastern
Municipal Water District’s water service area. Water and sewer improvements
shall be installed per EMWD Standards and Fire Department requirements.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Engineering
Department
18) The incremental increase in runoff volume between developed and undeveloped
state for the 85th percentile storm, shall be retained within onsite private
detention facilities. The applicant larger storms proposes to collect into the
detention system and discharge them into Main Street through a curb outlet.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Engineering
Department
19) This project is located within the limits of the San Jacinto Valley Area Drainage
Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted by the City. Drainage fees shall
be paid as set forth under the provisions of the “Rules and Regulations for
Administration of Area Drainage Plan”.
During
Construction Planning 20) MM NOI 4 - Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use.
During
Construction Planning
21) MM NOI 1 - Construction shall occur during the permissible hours as defined in
Section 8.40.090.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 16 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
During
Construction Planning
22) MM NOI 2 - During construction, the contactor shall ensure all construction
equipment is equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices.
During
Construction Planning
23) MM NOI 3 - The contractor shall locate equipment staging areas that will create
the greatest distance between construction -related noise/vibration sources and
sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits –SPDR 17-17
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
24) All buildings except for the retail building located on Parcel 1 for which Design
Review of Elevations were included for SPDR 17-17 shall submit for and obtain
Site Plan and Design Review approval.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
25) The developer shall enter into an agreement with the City franchised trash
hauler for the removal of construction waste and debris from the construction
site.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
26) Submit a detailed landscape and irrigation plan for review and approval. The
landscape plans shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect in
conformance with Chapter 17.325 – Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation
and Section 17.325.060 — Landscape and Irrigation Submittal Package
Requirements of the Development Code and the City Landscape Design
Guidelines for review and approval by the City Landscape Architect. Plans
should be submitted at least 30 days prior to the expected date of permit
issuance.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 17 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
27) Submit, for Planning approval, an outdoor lighting plan in compliance with the
following:
A. A site plan showing all parking lot light standards, building mounted light
fixtures, and any up-lighting in landscaping, low-level walk lights, and
lighting diffused off of wall surfaces.
B. Cut sheets for all proposed lighting fixtures.
C. The lighting shall be indirect, hooded, and arranged to reflect lighting
away from adjoining properties and streets in compliance with Section
17.300.080 (Outdoor Light and Glare).
D. Parking lot light standards shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height
overall, as measured from the usable parking or driving surface.
E. Outdoor lighting shall maintain a minimum of one-foot candle
illumination for all parking and pedestrian areas and shall not exceed
one-half foot candle along property lines of the subject site.
F. Include a photometric plan that includes details such as beam spreads
and/or photometric calculations, location and type of fixtures, and
arrangement of exterior lighting that does not create glare or hazardous
interference to adjacent streets or properties.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
28) Submit for Planning approval, the plans for trash enclosures. Pursuant to City
standards, trash receptacles shall be enclosed by a six (6) foot high solid
decorative masonry wall with solid view-obstructing gates, a solid roof with trellis
feature, an ADA accessible pedestrian entrance and a drain to the sewer system.
The enclosures shall be designed so they cannot be entered into in any way when
door and gates are closed and locked. Approved Trash Enclosure plans shall be
shown on the plans submitted for Plan Check.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 18 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits I
Planning
29) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall record a “Water Quality
Management Plan and Urban Runoff BMP Transfer Access and Maintenance
Agreement,” to provide public notice of the re quirement to implement the
approved Final project-specific WQMP and the maintenance requirements
associated with the WQMP.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
30) The developer/applicant or successor in interest may have to secure coverage
under the State’s General Industrial Activities Storm Water Permit as issued by
the State Water Resources Control Board.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
31) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall ensure the following
pursuant to Section XII. I of the 2010 NPDES Permit. Field verification that
structural Site Design, Source Control, and Treatment Control BMPs are
designed, constructed and functional in accordance with the approved Final Water
Quality Management Plan (WQMP). City WQMP Inspector will be notified for
required inspections during construction.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 19 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
32) MM GEO 1 - The Soil and Foundation Report (Soils Southwest, 2017) provides
foundation recommendations to minimize seismic-induced settlement hazards.
These include using conventional checkered/waffle type rigid footings for exterior
load bearing walls along with interior grade beams, or using a rigid mat foundation.
Additional recommendations address concrete slab construction and cu ring,
excavation and fill, pavement and utility trenches. The recommendations identified
in the Soil and Foundation Report, or similar measures approved by a registered
civil engineer, shall be incorporated into the construction plans. Project plans will
be reviewed during the plan check process to confirm geotechnical design
measures are incorporated to address the potential for seismic-induced
settlement. These measures shall be incorporated into final construction plans
prior to issuance of building permits.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Engineering
33) MM TRAF 2 - Ramona Expressway/Main Street-Lake Park Drive: The project
applicant shall restripe the eastbound approach to include one left turn lane, one
through lane, and one shared through/right turn lane.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
34) MM NOI 7 - All HVAC units on the roofs of the retail buildings on Parcels 1 and 2
shall be shielded to maintain the nighttime standard of 45 dBA at the adjacent
residential property line. A parapet or acoustic screen shall be provided that
extends two feet in height above the top of the HVAC units. A noise control
analysis of the HVAC plans and specifications shall be provided prior to issuance
of building permits to ensure that the HVAC units would not exceed the 45 dBA
standard at the adjacent residential property line.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 20 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Building &
Safety
35) Any building, sign, or structure to be constructed or located on site, will require
professionally prepared plans based on the most current City and California
Building Codes, submitted for review and approval and comply with the following:
The proposed roof-mounted equipment shall be completely screened so as
not to be visible from any street or private property adjacent to the Project.
The screening shall be an integral part of the building; details shall be provided
to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to issuance of
building permits. Any proposed change shall be reviewed and approved by
the Planning Department.
Any ground mounted equipment or equipment attached to the building,
including gas and electrical meters, and electrical or mechanic cabinets shall
be completely screened so as not to be visible from any street or private
property adjacent to the Project. Chain link fencing is not an approved
screening material.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Building &
Safety
36) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall pay school fees as required
by State law. The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall receive written
clearance from the San Jacinto Unified School District.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Building &
Safety
37) All lumber scraps, combustible materials, and other debris shall be picked up
daily, or more often as required by the Building and Safety Division.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Cal Fire –
Riverside
County Fire
Department
38) The required water system, including all fire hydrant(s), shall be installed and
accepted by the appropriate water agency and the Riverside County Fire
Department prior to any combustible building material placed on an individual lot.
Approved water plans must be at the job site.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 21 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Cal Fire –
Riverside
County Fire
Department
39) Fire Sprinkler System: All structures 3,600 square feet or larger will be required to
install a fire sprinkler system in accordance with the CFC and NFPA 13. Ref. CFC
903.2 as amended by the City of San Jacinto.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Cal Fire –
Riverside
County Fire
Department
40) Fire hydrants shall be located within 400’ of all exterior portions of the structures,
along required fire apparatus access roads, and adjacent to public streets in the
quantities and up to the maximum distance as required by California Fire Code
and Riverside County Fire Department.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Cal Fire –
Riverside
County Fire
Department
41) The address shall be posted per Riverside County Fire Department standards
and will be clearly visible from public roadway.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Engineering
Department
42) The developer shall provide water and sewer services to this project in accordance
with the requirements of the appropriate utility purveyor. This project is within the
Eastern Municipal Water District’s sewer and water service area. Water and sewer
improvements shall be installed per EMWD standards.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Engineering
Department
43) All rights-of-way dedication shall be offered to the public and shall continue in
force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. Dedications shall be free
from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Engineering
Department
44) Paved access shall be provided to the proposed buildings per precise grading
plan.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 22 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Engineering
Department
45) The developer/property owner shall submit a compaction certification from the
Soils Engineer in compliance with the approved geotechnical/soils report.
Prior to Occupancy – SPDR 17-17
Prior to
Occupancy Planning 46) All required on-site improvements shall be installed per approved plans.
Prior to
Occupancy Planning
47) Lighting shall be provided throughout the parking area at all hours of customer
and employee use.
Prior to
Occupancy Planning
48) All landscaping, dust control measures, all walls/fences, pedestrian walkways,
irrigation systems, etc. as delineated on the approved landscape plan shall be
installed.
Prior to
Occupancy Planning
49) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall submit the following items
for the landscape and irrigation development and maintenance:
a. The signed Landscape Certificate of Completion pursuant to Section
17.325.070 – Certificate of Completion of the Development Code;
b. The irrigation scheduling pursuant to Section 17.325.080 – Irrigation
Scheduling of the Development Code;
c. The Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Schedule pursuant to Section
17.325.090 – Landscape and Irrigation maintenance Schedule of the
Development Code; and
d. The Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and Irrigation Water Use Analysis
pursuant to Section 17.325.100 — Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and
Irrigation Water Use Analysis of the Development Code.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 23 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Occupancy Planning
50) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall pay any outstanding
planning application or processing fees.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
51) The City has adopted Traffic Signal Mitigation fees and the Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program; this Project shall be subject to the payment of
these fees prior to the issuance of building permits unless exempted by the
ordinance establishing the TUMF program. The fees shall be subject to the
provisions of the enabling ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in effect at
the time of fee payment.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
52) The City of San Jacinto has adopted the area-wide Multi-Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP). This Project is subject to the payment of fees prior
to the occupancy. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of the enabling
ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in effect at the time of payment.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
53) Specific addresses for each building shall be provided to make such number
plainly visible from the public street, avenue, court, or alley upon which property
fronts, and shall be contrasting color and background.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
54) Prior to occupancy all Department/Division requirements and signoffs shall be
complete.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 24 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
55) Improve Ramona Expressway Urban Arterial Highway Standard (modified –
146’/114’ including an 18’ wide raised landscaped median and 16-foot parking) to
include installation of half-width street improvements along the property frontage;
curb and gutter located 57’ west of centerline and a 12’ wide Class 1 multi-purpose
trail within the 16’ wide parkway. If the existing pavement is in good condition the
developer/property owner may use grind and overlay technique as determined by
the City Engineer. The design shall provide the lane assignments as depicted on
the conceptual signing and striping plan prepared by Michael Baker International
as included in the staff report.
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
56) Improve Main Street - Secondary Highway Standard (100’/64’) to include
installation of 6’ wide sidewalk within the 18’ wide parkway. If the existing
pavement if in good condition the developer/property owner may use grind and
overlay technique as determined by the City Engineer.
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
57) Upgrade the existing traffic signal at the southwest corner of the intersection of
Main Street and Ramona Expressway to ultimate design per City of San Jacinto
and Riverside County Standards.
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
58) Install traffic signals at the intersection of Ramona Expressway and Donna Way
to ultimate design per City of San Jacinto and Riverside County Standards. This
will require removal of a portion of the existing median to accommodate turning
movement for northbound Ramona Expressway traffic, and the removal of the
existing porkchop at the existing pavement if in good condition may be grind and
overlayed as determined by the City Engineer
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 25 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
59) The developer’s traffic study indicates that Main and Hewitt would not operate at
an acceptable level of service after development of the site. Therefore, the
developer shall install the signal at Hewitt and Main Street. Alternatively, the
Developer shall execute the Soboba Mitigation Agreement, and provide the City
with funds as detailed in the terms to that agreement. The City, subject to Council
approval, would allocate funds toward the installation of the signal by a City
administered public works contract.
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
60) The driveways on Main Street and Ramona Expressway shall be limited to right -
in/right-out only.
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
61) Existing cables (under 66kv) shall be undergrounded and poles removed. All
other poles if in conflict with proposed improvements shall be relocated, this may
impact a signal pole at Ramona Expressway and Donna Way.
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
62) Streetlights shall be installed on Ramona Expressway, Main Street and Donna
Way adjacent to the site, as approved by the City Engineer.
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
63) The property owner(s) shall support the continuous maintenance of the street
lighting by annexing to the appropriate district prior to Certificate of Occupancy.
All onsite lighting, drainage facilities, WQMP improvements and parking/median
landscaping shall be the responsibility of the property owner. The property owner
shall be responsible to pay its share of the maintenance of the traffic signals at
the intersections of:
Ramona Expressway and Main Street
Ramona Expressway and Donna Way
Main Street and Hewitt Street
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 26 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
64) Any appurtenances damaged or broken during the development of this project
shall be repaired or removed and replaced by the developer/property owner to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed
shall be reset by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and
Professional Code 8771.
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
65) MM TRAF 1 - Main Street/Hewitt Street: The project applicant shall make a fair
share contribution to the construction of a signal at this location.
Prior to
Occupancy
Riverside
County
Environmental
Health
66) A Hazardous Materials Business Plan permit must be obtained prior to operation.
California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) submittal necessary
(http://cers.calepa.ca.gov/)
Prior to
Occupancy
Special
Districts
67) Establish a funding mechanism for the maintenance of public improvements and
public safety services.
Annexation into the Community Facilities District (CFD) for Public Facilities
Maintenance (MC 15.08.015) is an option to fulfill the funding requirement for
maintenance of public improvements.
$21,800.00 + $25 per parcel
Funding of services under the City’s CFDs will consist of an annual assessment
based on the costs of such services, as determined by a City’s Engineer’s
Estimate, established at the time of annexation.
Prior to
Occupancy
Special
Districts
68) Development must comply with Storm Water Basin & Pump Specifications and
Standards.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 27 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Occupancy
Special
Districts
69) Development must comply with Landscape and Irrigation Design Guidelines.
Prior to
Occupancy
Special
Districts
70) Landscape improvements shall have irrigation water meters, exclusive for right -
of-way landscaping.
Prior to
Occupancy
Special
Districts
71) Landscape areas in the right-of-way shall have an independent irrigation control
system, exclusive for right-of-way landscaping.
Cal-Sense 3000 or newer is required for all irrigation areas
Overall Project Operational Conditions
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
72) MM NOI 5 - Solid Waste and recycling collection shall only occur during daytime
hours (7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.).
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
73) MM NOI 6 - Truck deliveries shall only occur during daytime hours (7:00 a.m.
and 7:00 p.m.).
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 28 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Conditions For CUP 17-09
Description: Service Station with 24 fuel stations, a 3,048 square foot Convenience Store , with a type 20 license for beer
and wine sales, and 1,105 square foot car wash.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits –CUP
Prior to
Grading Planning 74) The developer shall submit a Site Plan & Design Review for review and
approval.
Prior to
Grading Planning
75) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall submit three (3) copies of a
comprehensive grading plan at 40-scale for review and approval to the
Engineering Department with any required fee and one (1) copy to the Project
Planner. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, City
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. The plan shall be
drawn on 24" X 36" Mylar by a registered civil engineer. A copy of all pages of
these conditions shall be included in the plans.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
76) Submit a detailed landscape and irrigation plan for review and approval. The
landscape plans shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect in
conformance with Chapter 17.325 – Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation and
Section 17.325.060 — Landscape and Irrigation Submittal Package Requirements
of the Development Code and the City Landscape Design Guidelines for review
and approval by the City Landscape Architect. Plans should be submitted at least
30 days prior to the expected date of permit issuance.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Building &
Safety
77) Any building, sign, or structure to be constructed or located on site, will require
professionally prepared plans based on the most current City and California
Building Codes, submitted for review and approval.
Prior to
Issuance of Planning 78) Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with
SCAQMD rules, Rule 201 – Permit to Construct, Rule 203 – Permit to Operate,
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 29 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Building
Permits
and Rule 461 – Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing by obtaining the proper
permits from SCAQMD.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Building &
Safety
79) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall pay school fees as required
by State law. The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall receive
written clearance from the San Jacinto Unified School District
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Riverside
County
Environmental
Health
80) For the Convenience Store and Gas Station, the construction plan and permit
shall be submitted to County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health
and be approved prior to starting construction.
Prior to Occupancy
Prior to
Occupancy Planning 81) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall pay any outstanding
planning application or processing fees.
Prior to
Occupancy Planning
82) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall record a “Water Quality
Management Plan and Urban Runoff BMP Transfer Access and Maintenance
Agreement,” to provide public notice of the requirement to implement the approved
Final project-specific WQMP and the maintenance requirements associated with
the WQMP.
Prior to
Occupancy Planning
83) The developer/applicant or successor in interest may have to secure coverage
under the State’s General Industrial Activities Storm Water Permit as issued by
the State Water Resources Control Board.
Prior to
Occupancy Planning
84) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall ensure the following,
pursuant to Section XII. I. of the 2010 NPDES Permit:
Field verification that structural Site Design, Source Control, and Treatment
Control BMPs are designed, constructed and functional in accordance with the
approved Final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). City WQMP Inspector
will be notified for required inspections during construction.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 30 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
The irrigation scheduling pursuant to Section 17.325.080 – Irrigation
Scheduling of the Development Code;
The Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Schedule pursuant to Sec-tion
17.325.090 – Landscape and Irrigation maintenance Schedule of the
Development Code; and
The Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and Irrigation Water Use Analysis
pursuant to Section 17.325.100 — Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and
Irrigation Water Use Analysis of the Development Code.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
85) Prior to final inspection by Building and Safety Division and/or issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy the applicant shall pay in full all fees.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
86) Specific addresses for each building shall be provided to make such
number plainly visible from the public street, avenue, court, or alley upon which
property fronts, and shall be contrasting color and background.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
87) Prior to occupancy all Department/Division requirements and signoffs shall be
complete.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
88) The City has adopted Traffic Signal Mitigation fees and the Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program; this Project shall be subject to the payment of
these fees prior to the issuance of building permits unless exempted by the
ordinance establishing the TUMF program. The fees shall be subject to the
provisions of the enabling ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in effect at
the time of building permit issuance.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
89) The City of San Jacinto has adopted the area-wide Multi-Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP). This Project is subject to the payment of fees prior
to the issuance of building permits unless exempted by the ordinance establishing
the MSHCP program. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of the enabling
ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit
issuance.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 31 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Prior to
Occupancy
Riverside
County
Environmental
Health
90) A Hazardous Waste Generator Permit must be obtained prior to operation.
Prior to
Occupancy
Riverside
County
Environmental
Health
91) A Hazardous Materials Business Plan permit must be obtained prior to
operation. California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) submittal
necessary (http://cers.calepa.ca.gov/)
Prior to
Occupancy
Riverside
County
Environmental
Health
92) An Underground Storage Tank operating permit must be obtained prior to
operation. DEH Hax Mat Plan Check process required.
OPERATONAL CONDITIONS
Operation
Conditions Planning 93) A Hazardous Waste Generator Permit must be obtained prior to operation.
Operation
Conditions Planning
94) The service station with a convenience store with off-sale beer and wine license
shall be operated as described in the submitted application for this Project and
as described in the body of the staff report; unless superseded by these
conditions of approval.
Operation
Conditions Planning
95) The service station with a convenience store with off-sale beer and wine license
shall be developed and operated per the required standards of the Development
Code
Operation
Conditions Planning
96) A copy of the Conditional Use Permit and Final Conditions of Approval shall be
available at the site and presented to City staff, including the Police Department
and Code Enforcement, upon request. Failure to have the latest approved
conditions available upon request will be grounds for revocation of the
Conditional Use Permit.
Operation
Conditions Planning 97) A copy of the California Department of Alcohol and Beverage Control license for
the premises shall be available at the site and presented to City staff, including
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 32 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
the Police Department and Code Enforcement, upon request. Failure to have the
license available upon request will be grounds for revocation of the Conditional
Use Permit.
Operation
Conditions Planning
98) The off-sale alcohol premises shall be posted to indicate that it is unlawful for an y
person to drink or consume any alcoholic beverage in any public place or posted
premises.
Operation
Conditions Planning 99) A sign shall be posted in front of the convenience store indicating that no loitering
is permitted.
Operation
Conditions Planning 100) No sale of alcoholic beverages shall be made from a drive-through lane or
window.
Operation
Conditions Planning 101) The display area of the alcoholic beverages shall be limited to 2% of the total
floor area of the store, as depicted on the conceptual floor plan
Operation
Conditions Planning 102) No displays of beer and wine shall be located within five-feet of the store’s
entrances, windows or checkout counter.
Operation
Conditions Planning 103) Cold beer and wine shall be sold from, or displayed in, the main, permanently
affixed electrical coolers only.
Operation
Conditions Planning
104) No beer or wine advertising shall be located on service station islands; no
advertising for beer or wine shall be located on buildings or windows visible to
the exterior.
Operation
Conditions Planning
105) All security cameras, both interior and exterior, around the facility covering the
inside and outside of the building as well as surrounding areas, shall be
maintained in good operational service and used 24 hours a day
Operation
Conditions Planning 106) At least 240 hours of video data will be recorded and saved for future playback
or review.
Operation
Conditions Planning
107) The business windows of the convenience store shall not be tinted or obscured
in any way, including by temporary or painted window signs, and the interior
lighting of the building shall remain at adequate levels to clearly see into the
business from the exterior.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 33 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Operation
Conditions Planning
108) The subject alcoholic beverage license shall not be exchanged for a public
premises type license or operated as a public premise. All alcoholic beverages
sold shall be for consumption off the premises.
Operation
Conditions Planning 109) All storage and display of merchandise and supplies must be conducted within
the building.
Operation
Conditions Planning 110) Lighting shall be provided throughout the parking area at all hours of customer
and employee use.
Operation
Conditions Planning
111) All parking and drive aisles shall be screened from the public right -of-way with a
landscape hedge or decorative wall, as reviewed and approved by the Planning
and Community Development Director.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 34 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Conditions For MUP 17-09
Project Description: A Minor Use Permit for a fast-food restaurant with drive-through service totaling 2,800 square feet.
Prior to Grading
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
112) The developer shall submit a Site Plan & Design Review for review and approval.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
113) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall submit three (3) copies of
a comprehensive grading plan at 40-scale for review and approval to the
Engineering Department with any required fee and one (1) copy to the Project
Planner. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, City
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. The plan shall be
drawn on 24" X 36" Mylar by a registered civil engineer. A copy of all pages of
these conditions shall be included in the plans.
Prior to Building Permits
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
114) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall pay school fees as required
by State law. The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall receive
written clearance from the San Jacinto Unified School District.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
115) Any building, sign, or structure to be constructed or located on site, will require
professionally prepared plans based on the most current County and California
Building Codes, submitted for review and approval.
Prior to Occupancy
116) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall pay any outstanding
planning application or processing fees.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
117) Specific addresses for each building shall be provided to make such number
plainly visible from the public street, avenue, court, or alley upon which property
fronts, and shall be contrasting color and background.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 35 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
118) Prior to occupancy all Department/Division requirements and signoffs shall be
complete.
119) Prior to final inspection by Building and Safety Division and/or issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy the applicant shall pay in full all fees.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
120) The City has adopted Traffic Signal Mitigation fees and the Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program; this Project shall be subject to the
payment of these fees prior to the issuance of building permits unless exempted
by the ordinance establishing the TUMF program. The fees shall be subject to
the provisions of the enabling ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in
effect at the time of building permit issuance.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
121) The City of San Jacinto has adopted the area-wide Multi-Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP). This Project is subject to the payment of fees prior
to the occupancy. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of the enabling
ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in effect at the time of payment.
Operational Conditions
Operational
Conditions Planning
122) The fast-food restaurant with a drive-through, automated car wash and tire store
shall be operated as described in the submitted application for this Project and as
described in the body of the staff report; unless superseded by these conditions
of approval.
Operational
Conditions Planning
123) The permit a fast food restaurant with a drive -through, automated car wash, and
tire store shall be developed and operated per the required standards of the
Development Code.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 36 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Conditions of Approval – MUP 17-10
Project Description: A Minor Use Permit for a fast-food restaurant with drive-through service totaling 3,200 square
feet.
Prior to Grading
Prior to Precise
Grading Planning 124) The developer shall submit a Site Plan & Design Review for review and
approval.
Prior to Precise
Grading Planning
125) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall submit three (3) copies of
a comprehensive grading plan at 40-scale for review and approval to the
Engineering Department with any required fee and one (1) copy to the Project
Planner. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, Cit y
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. The plan shall
be drawn on 24" X 36" Mylar by a registered civil engineer. A copy of all pages
of these conditions shall be included in the plans.
Prior to Building Permits
Prior to
Building
Permits
Building and
Safety
126) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall pay school fees as required
by State law. The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall receive
written clearance from the San Jacinto Unified School District.
Prior to
Building
Permits
Building and
Safety
127) Any building, sign, or structure to be constructed or located on site, will require
professionally prepared plans based on the most current County and California
Building Codes, submitted for review and approval.
Prior to Occupancy
Prior to
Occupancy Planning 128) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall pay any outstanding
planning application or processing fees.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
129) Prior to final inspection by Building and Safety Division and/or issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy the applicant shall pay in full all fees.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
130) Specific addresses for each building shall be provided to make such
number plainly visible from the public street, avenue, court, or alley upon which
property fronts, and shall be contrasting color and background.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 37 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
131) Prior to occupancy all Department/Division requirements and signoffs shall be
complete.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
132) The City has adopted Traffic Signal Mitigation fees and the Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program; this Project shall be subject to the
payment of these fees prior to the issuance of building permits unless exempted
by the ordinance establishing the TUMF program. The fees shall be subject to
the provisions of the enabling ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in
effect at the time of building permit issuance.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
133) The City of San Jacinto has adopted the area-wide Multi-Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP). This Project is subject to the payment of fees prior
to the occupancy. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of the enabling
ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in effect at the time of payment.
Prior to
Occupancy Public Works 134) All exterior lighting shall be LED, including both wall packs and parking
lights. Interior lighting shall be LED as well
Operational Conditions
Operational
Conditions Planning
135) The fast-food restaurant with a drive-through, automated car wash and tire store
shall be operated as described in the submitted application for this Project and
as described in the body of the staff report; unless superseded by these
conditions of approval.
Operational
Conditions Planning
136) The permit a fast food restaurant with a drive-through, automated car wash, and
tire store shall be developed and operated per the required standards of the
Development Code.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: 02 - Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05,Planning Conditions (August 27, 2019) - Superceded4.1.c
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION PC 19-09
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL ADOPT CHANGE OF ZONE 17-05 TO CHANGE THE ZONE
FROM COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL;
APPROVE SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW 17-17 FOR A
COMMERCIAL CENTER; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 17-09 FOR A
SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE WITH OFF-SALE
ALCOHOL SALES, AN AUTOMATED CAR WASH, AND VARIANCE 17-
05 TO ALLOW A SERVICE STATION WITH 24-PUMP DISPENSERS
WHERE A MAXIMUM OF 15 ARE PERMITTED; MINOR USE PERMITS
17-09 AND 17-10 TO PERMIT TWO FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS WITH
A DRIVE-THROUGH; AND MINOR USE PERMIT 17-11 TO EXCEED THE
REQUIRED PARKING SPACES BY MORE THAN 5 PERCENT, ON THE
WEST SIDE OF RAMONA EXPRESSWAY, EXTENDING BETWEEN
MAIN STREET AND DONNA WAY.
WHEREAS, All–Specks, Inc, on behalf of Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians filed
applications on November 21, 2017, and June 24, 2019 for a Change of Zone 17-05 (17-
05) Site Plan and Design Review 17-17 (SPDR 17-17); Conditional Use Permit 17-09
(CUP-17-09); Variance 17-05 (VAR-17-05); Minor Use Permit 17-09, 17-10, and 17-11
(MUP 17-09), (MUP 17-10), and MUP 17-11); (“applications”), located west of Ramona
Expressway, extending between Main Street and Donna Way. (“Subject Site”);
WHEREAS, the Applications are proposed to develop the Luiseno Village Project
as a commercial development with SPDR 17-17 for the review of the overall site and
building designs, a CUP 17-09 to permit a service station with a convenience store to
have an off-sale beer and wine license, and a carwash, VAR 17-05 to allow 24 fuel
pumps where a maximum of 15 are permitted, MUP 17-09 and MUP 17-10 to permit two
fast food restaurants with a drive-through, MUP 17-11 to exceed the required parking
spaces by more than 5 percent, and CZ 17-05 to change the Zone from CN –
Commercial Neighborhood to CG – Commercial General (“Project”) ;
WHEREAS, the Applications were reviewed, studied, and found to not have a
significant effect on the environment under the California Environmental Quality Act
(“CEQA”) as more fully described below;
WHEREAS, on August 27, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of San
Jacinto (“Commission”) conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which
time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the Applications were heard and the
Applications were comprehensively reviewed; and
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: 03 - PC Resolution 19-09 (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Based on the entire record before the Commission, all written and
oral evidence presented to the Commission, and the findings set forth in Attachment 1 of
the staff report, the Commission recommends that the City Council approve the following:
1) SPDR 17-17 for Luiseno Village; 2) CUP 17-09 to permit a service station and car
wash, with off-sale beer and wine license; 3) VAR 17-05 to allow 24 fuel pumps where a
maximum of 15 pumps are permitted; 4) MUP 17-09 and MUP 17-10 to permit two fast
food restaurants with a drive through; 6) MUP 17-11 to exceed the allowed parking spaces
by more than 5 percent, and 8) CZ 17-05 to change the Zone from CN – Commercial
Neighborhood to CG – Commercial General on the Subject Site (“the Project”), and
subject to the Conditions of Approval.
SECTION 2. Based on the entire record before the Commission, including the
Findings of Fact found in Attachment 1 of the staff report, and all written and oral
evidence presented to the Commission, including the staff report, Mitigated Negative
Declaration (MND), and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) the
Commission finds as follows:
A. The proposed zoning designation of the Subject Site provides for land uses
that are compatible with the Community Commercial General Plan
designation for the Subject Site.
B. The Project is permitted in the requested CG – Commercial General Zone and
as conditioned will be consistent with the General Plan and the City’s
Landscape Design Guidelines.
C. The Project, as conditioned, will comply with City’s – Commercial General
Zone and Standards of the Development Code.
D. The Project, as conditioned, provides for land uses compatible with the
surrounding area, as the surrounding area is developed with similar
commercial development.
E. The Project is consistent with City standards, ordinances, and policies.
F. The Subject Site is physically suitable for the type and density of development
proposed under because the Project is proposed to be developed at a density
that is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designations and Zoning.
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: 03 - PC Resolution 19-09 (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
G. The Project, as conditioned, will provide adequate access, design, water
efficient landscaping, and has mitigated traffic and other environmental
impacts.
SECTION 3. Based on the entire record before the Planning Commission and all
written and oral evidence presented, the Planning Commission recommends that the
City Council find that the Project will comply with CEQA for the following reasons:
A. Based upon the information contained in the Initial Study and pursuant to the
requirements of CEQA; it has been determined that this Project, with the
incorporation of mitigation measures, will not have a significant impact on the
environment. The mitigation measures required to reduce or mitigate the
impacts of this Project on the environment are included in the Project design
and/or the Mitigation Monitoring Program and are included as part of the
Mitigated Negative Declaration for this Project.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on the 27th day of August 2019.
Planning Commission Chairperson
ATTEST:
Planning Commission Secretary
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: 03 - PC Resolution 19-09 (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
O SPDR 17-17, GPA 7-05 and C Z 17-15Locational Map
!
!
Indian Health Clinic
North Mountain Mid Sch
7TH
MAIN LAKE PARKRAMONADONNAMIRACLEOFFERINGC
O
U
R
T
L
A
N
D
PRAISEDOGWOOD
REWARD
MOU
N
T
A
I
N
POPPY
O A K K N O LLBOXELDERFORSITHIASEDUM
TRUTH
S
T. A
L
B
A
N
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics,CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS UserCommunity
SUBJECTSITE
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: 04 - Location Map (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
O SPDR 17-17, GPA 7-05 and C Z 17-15General Plan Map
7TH
MAIN RAMONALAKE PARKDONNAMIRACLEOFFERINGPRAISE
REWARDDOGWOOD
MOU
N
T
A
I
N
POPPY
O A K K N O LLBOXELDERCORNFLOWER
FORSITHIASEDUM
TRUTH
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics,CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS UserCommunity
SUBJECTSITE
Landuse
GPLU
Low Density Residential
Community Commercial
Park
4.1.e
Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: 05 - General Plan Land Use Map (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
O SPDR 17-17, GPA 7-05 and C Z 17-15Zoning Map
!
!
Indian Health Clinic
North Mountain Mid Sch
7TH
MAIN RAMONALAKE PARKDONNAMIRACLEOFFERINGPRAISE
REWARDDOGWOOD
MOU
N
T
A
I
N
POPPY
O A K K N O LLBOXELDERCORNFLOWER
FORSITHIASEDUM
TRUTH CN
RL
OSG
PI RM
SP
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics,CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS UserCommunity
SUBJECTSITE
Change of Zone request fromCommercial Neighborhood (CN) toCommercial General (CG)
4.1.f
Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: 06 - Zoning Map (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
SSSSS S S SSSSSSS SSSSSSNOPARKINGNO
PA
R
K
I
N
G
NO
PARKING
NOPARKING
60'243'60'156'40'70'79'40'33'-6"91'CLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EV
CLEAN
A
IR
/VANPOOL / EVCLE
A
N
A
IR
/
VA
N
P
OO
L
/
E
V
CLEAN
A
IR
/VANPOOL / EV
CLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EV
NOPARKINGCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EV
CLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EV CLEAN A
IR
/VAN
P
OO
L
/
EV
CLEAN
A
I
R
/VANPOOL / E
V
CLEAN
A
IR
/
VANPOOL
/
EVCLEAN AI
R
/VANPOOL / E
V
EVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEV50'32'18'10' DRAINAGEEASEMENT20' SEWEREASEMENT4' WIDE DRAINAGECHANNEL6' BLOCK WALL10' DRAINAGEEASEMENT20' SEWEREASEMENT4' WIDEDRAINAGECHANNELUNDERSIDEWALKDRAIN4' WIDEDRAINAGECHANNEL10'DRAINAGEEASEMENTNOPARKINGNOPARKINGCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVEVEVEVEVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVEVEVVVVVVVVVVVVLOADING ZONELOADING ZONELLLLLLLYY
YYNOPARKINGNO
PAR
K
I
N
G
NOPARKING
NOPARKING
60'243'60'156'40'70'79'40'33'-6"91'CLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EV
CL
EAN A
IR /VAN
POOL /
EV
CLEAN
AIR /
VANP
OO
L
/ EV
CLEAN AI
R
/VAN
POO
L / EV
CLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EV
NOPARKINGCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EV
CLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EV
CLEAN
AIR
/
VANPOOL / EV
CLEAN
A
IR /VANPO
O
L / EV
CLEAN AIR /
VANP
OOL / EV
CLEAN
A
IR /VANP
OOL /
EV
EVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEV50'32'18'10' DRAINAGEEASEMENT20' SEWEREASEMENT4' WIDE DRAINAGECHANNEL6' BLOCK WALL10' DRAINAGEEASEMENT20' SEWEREASEMENT4' WIDEDRAINAGECHANNELUNDERSIDEWALKDRAIN4' WIDEDRAINAGECHANNEL0'RAINAGEASEMENTNOPARKINGNOPARKINGCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVEVEVEVEVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVEVEVVVVVLOADING ZONELOADING ZONELLLYY
YYOVERALL SITE PLANA1"=40'-0"FUTURECONVENIENCE STORE3,048 S.F.(NOT A PAT)BILL SPECK10073 VALLEY VIEW ST.CYPRESS, CA 90630PHONE: 714-606-9141e-mail: allspeckslnc@yahoo.comCopyright 2016, MPA Architects, Inc.. All rights reserved.cDESCRIPTIONREVISIONSNO.DATEPROJECTCLIENTA PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT:F. 619.236.0557AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTSwww.mpa-architects.comMEMBERSan Diego, CA 92104V. 619.236.05953578 30th StreetM P A A R C H I T E C T S I N C .DATABASE:SHEET NUMBER:SCALE:SHEET TITLECHECKED BY:PROJECT NO:17069-L. DALEPLOT DATE:DRAWN BY:AS NOTED-1706906-30-19LUISENO VILLAGES.E.C. HWY 79 AND MAIN ST.SAN JACINTO, CA 92583LICENSEDARCHITEC T
S TATEOOFCALIFRNIANHOJRUMSE Y
C26819Exp. 3-31-2019SP1.0OVERALL SITE PLAN(FOR REFERENCE ONLY)NOTE:ALL SITE PLAN DESIGN FEATURES AND INFRASTRUCTURE BEYONDPARCEL 1 (INCLUDING BUT LIMITED TO: CONCRETE CURBS, PARKINGLOT, SITE LIGHTING, TRASH ENCLOSURE, STORM WATER SYSTEM,AND LANDSCAPE) ARE PART OF A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, UNDERA SEPARATE PERMIT AND SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY.FUTURE DRIVE-THRURESTAURANT (PAD IV)3,200 S.F.(NOT A PAT)FUTURERETAIL (PAD II)9,360 S.F.(NOT A PAT)PROPOSEDRETAIL (PAD I)14,583 S.F.FUTURE DRIVE-THRURESTAURANT (PAD III)2,800 S.F.(NOT A PAT)3TYP.7TYP.26'26'26'30'30'30'36'30'20'30'19'16'-9"38'19'19'10'-3"6'
PARKWAY
6'
SIDEWALK
12'
LS SETBACK
9'TYP.26'26'19'16'-9"38'19'9'TYP.30'38'30'19'12'8'10'-6"43'-6"36'36'
30'30'30'30'30'10'12'
12'10'19'30'30'60'30'
30'
20'
20'10'10'15'-6"73'30'12'30'10'-6"30'10'-4"35'-9"12'5'TYP.5'TYP.5'TYP.6'TYP.6'TYP.26'
26'12'12'12'9'TYP.38'1227TYP.7TYP.7TYP.7TYP.7TYP.5555553TYP.3TYP.3TYP.1221221222213TYP.3TYP.3TYP.3TYP.3TYP.182725TYP.253TYP.25TYP.24242420202520252017TYP.17TYP.1616161615TYP.15TYP.2520TYP.TYP.15TYP.151525201111118TYP.8TYP.8TYP.8TYP.8TYP.8TYP.8TYP.8TYP.8TYP.8TYP.1566666156866TYP.8TYP.62520TYP.66TYP.2TYP.2TYP.2TYP.2TYP.4TYP.4TYP.4TYP.32'-6"12'TYP.4TYP.3TYP.3TYP.8TYP.3TYP.8TYP.5'TYP.19TYP.19TYP.6TYP.8412631161251055352061064121272041216918810182619TYP.232314332928282929282829294'6'-4"30303036'15'141415'15'BUS CIRCULATION TEMPLATEB1"=80'-0"Lock to Lock TimeWidthTrack:::inchesCITY-BUS6.0102.0102.0Steering Angle 41.4:300.084.0480.041'15'20'41'20'15'41'3131PARKING ANALYSIS 8'188'BSP1.1SITE AREA:IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE (structures + paved area + hardscape): STRUCTURES COVERAGE (bldg., canopy, trash enclosure, etc): PAVED AREA COVERAGE (parking area + drive isles + hardscape):LANDSCAPE AREA COVERAGE:LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED (MIN. 5% OF PAVED AREA):PROPOSED TOTAL BLDG. AREA:FAR:EXISTING ZONING:PROPOSED ZONING:BUILDING SETBACKS:FRONT: 10' STREET SIDE: 10'REAR: 10' INTERIOR SIDE: NOT REQ'DLANDSCAPE SETBACKS:MAIN STREET: 6' PARKWAY + 6' WALK + 12' LANDSCAPE SETBACKRAMONA EXPRESS WAY: 12' PARKWAY + 8' WALK + 25' SCENIC SETBACKADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL (WEST SIDE): 15'412,058 (9.46 A)316,462 S.F. (7.26 A) - 76.8%36,847 S.F. (0.85 A) - 8.9%279,615 S.F. (6.58 A) - 67.9%95,596 S.F. (2.19 A) - 23.2%12,558 S.F. (MIN.)28,496 SQ.FT. - 6.91%0.069CN (COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD)CG (COMMERCIAL GENERAL)SITE ANALYSISPARCEL 1SITE AREAPROPOSED BLDG. AREA:COVERAGE:NUMBER OF STORIES (CBC TABLE 504.4):PROPOSED BLDG. HEIGHT (CBC TABLE 504.3):CONSTRUCTION TYPE:OCCUPANCY GROUP:PROPOSED USE:AREA SEPARATION WALL:BLDG. SPRINKLER:132,637 S.F. (3 A)14,583 S.F.11%01± 31'-0" A.F.F.V-BB-MRETAIL & FAST FOOT REST.NOTBDPARCEL 2SITE AREAPROPOSED BLDG. AREA (PAD2 - RETAIL):PROPOSED BLDG. AREA (PAD3 - RESTAURANT):COVERAGE:NUMBER OF STORIES (CBC TABLE 504.4):PROPOSED BLDG. HEIGHT (CBC TABLE 504.3):CONSTRUCTION TYPE:OCCUPANCY GROUP:PROPOSED USE:AREA SEPARATION WALL:BLDG. SPRINKLER:132,018 S.F. (3 A)9,360 S.F.2,800 S.F.9%01TBDV-BB-MRETAIL & FAST FOOT REST.NOTBDPARCEL 9SITE AREAPROPOSED BLDG. AREA:COVERAGE:NUMBER OF STORIES (CBC TABLE 504.4):PROPOSED BLDG. HEIGHT (CBC TABLE 504.3):CONSTRUCTION TYPE:OCCUPANCY GROUP:PROPOSED USE:AREA SEPARATION WALL:BLDG. SPRINKLER:61,122 S.F. (1.4 A)3,200 S.F.5%01TBDV-BB-MDRIVE-THRU FAST FOOT REST.NOTBDPARCEL 8SITE AREAPROPOSED BLDG. AREA (CONVENIENCE STORE):PROPOSED BLDG. AREA (CAR WASH):COVERAGE:NUMBER OF STORIES (CBC TABLE 504.4):PROPOSED BLDG. HEIGHT (CBC TABLE 504.3):CONSTRUCTION TYPE:OCCUPANCY GROUP:PROPOSED USE:AREA SEPARATION WALL:BLDG. SPRINKLER:86,281 S.F. (2 A)3,048 S.F.1,105 S.F.5%01TBDV-BBRETAIL & CAR WASHTBDTBD6'TYP.TYP.19TYP.16VICINITY MAPNOT TO SCALE13R.O.W. IMPROVEMENT NOTESAT DONNA WAY:a. ANY EXISTING IMPROVEMENT THAT ARE DEEMED SUBSTANDARD PER FIELD INSPECTION SHALLBE REPLACED IN KIND. THIS INCLUDES AC PAVING, CURB/GUTTER AND SIDEWALK.b. STREET LIGHTS WILL BE REQUIRED.c. PARKWAY LANDSCAPE WILL BE REQUIRED.AT RAMONA EXPRESSWAY:a. ANY EXISTING IMPROVEMENT THAT ARE DEEMED SUBSTANDARD PER FIELD INSPECTION SHALLBE REPLACED IN KIND. THIS INCLUDES AC PAVING, CURB/GUTTER AND SIDEWALK.b. STREET LIGHTS WILL BE REQUIRED.c. PARKWAY LANDSCAPE WILL BE REQUIRED.d. RAISED MEDIAN WILL BE REQUIRED.AT RAMONA EXPRESSWAY:a. ANY EXISTING IMPROVEMENT THAT ARE DEEMED SUBSTANDARD PER FIELD INSPECTION SHALLBE REPLACED IN KIND. THIS INCLUDES AC PAVING, CURB/GUTTER AND SIDEWALK.b. ADDITIONAL STREET LIGHTS MAY BE REQUIRED, DEPENDING ON PLACEMENT.c. PARKWAY LANDSCAPE WILL BE REQUIRED.FUTURECAR WASH1,105 S.F.(NOT A PAT)USERETAILRESTAURANT * (15%)RESTAURANT PATIOAREA12,396 SQ.FT.2,000 SQ.FT.187 SQ.FT.900 SQ.FT.REQUIRED1:2501:2001:601:50TOTAL50 STALLS10 STALLS3 STALLS18 STALLSPARCEL 1SHOPS BLDG AREA 14,583 SQ.FT.TOTAL PARKING REQUIREDTOTAL PARKING PROVIDEDSTANDARD SPACESHC SPACESCLEAN AIR/VAN POOL/EP PROVIDEDFUTURE EV SPACES PROVIDEDBUS PARKINGBICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED (SHORT-TERM)BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED (LONG-TERM)81 STALLS95 STALLS83 STALLS04 STALLS08 STALLS05 STALLS05 STALLS0605* RESTAURANT/DRIVE THRU:UP TO 2,000 SQ. FT. = 1 SPACE FOR EACH 200-SQ. FT. GFA OVER 2,000 SQ. FT. = 1 SPACE FOR EACHADDITIONAL 60 SQ. FT. GFA; AND STACKING FOR 7 VEHICLES AT EACH BAY, WINDOW, LANE, ORORDERING STATION FOR EACH NO ADDITIONAL PARKING REQUIRED IF OUTDOOR DINING AREACOMPRISES NO MORE THAN 15 PERCENT OF THE INTERIOR GROSS FLOOR AREA OF THE PRIMARYFOOD SERVICE USE; IF OUTDOOR DINING AREA IS OVER 15%, 1 SPACE FOR EVERY 50-SQ. FT. OR 1SPACE FOR EVERY 3 SEATS, WHICHEVER IS GREATER.** CAR WASH:1 PARKING SPACE PER EACH EMPLOYEE OF THE LARGEST SHIFT; STACKING FOR 4 VEHICLES FOREACH AUTOMATIC CAR WASH LANE, AND 3 SPACES PER LANE FOR MANUAL DRYINGUSERETAILRESTAURANT * (15%)RESTAURANT PATIODRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT *RESTAURANT PATIOAREA7,956 SQ.FT.1,404 SQ.FT.900 SQ.FT.2,000 SQ.FT.800 SQ.FT.1,000 SQ.FT.REQUIRED1:2501:2001:501:2001:601:50TOTAL32 STALLS7 STALLS18 STALLS10 STALLS13 STALLS20 STALLSPARCEL 2SHOPS BLDG AREA 9,360 SQ.FT.TOTAL PARKING REQUIREDTOTAL PARKING PROVIDEDSTANDARD SPACESHC SPACESCLEAN AIR/VAN POOL/EP PROVIDEDFUTURE EV SPACES PROVIDEDBICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED (SHORT-TERM)BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED (LONG-TERM)100 STALLS101 STALLS85 STALLS05 STALLS11 STALLS07 STALLS0605USEDRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT *RESTAURANT PATIOAREA2,000 SQ.FT.1,200 SQ.FT.1,000 SQ.FT.REQUIRED1:2001:601:50TOTAL10 STALLS20 STALLS20 STALLSPARCEL 9RESTAURANT BLDG AREA3,200 SQ.FT.TOTAL PARKING REQUIREDTOTAL PARKING PROVIDEDSTANDARD SPACESHC SPACESCLEAN AIR/VAN POOL/EP PROVIDEDFUTURE EV SPACES PROVIDEDBICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED (SHORT-TERM)BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED (LONG-TERM)50 STALLS55 STALLS47 STALLS02 STALLS06 STALLS04 STALLS42USECONVENIENCE STORECAR WASH **AREA3,048 SQ.FT.1,105 SQ.FT.REQUIRED1:2501:EACH EMPLOYEETOTAL12 STALLS4 STALLSPARCEL 8CONVENIENCE STORE BLDG. AREA 3,048 SQ.FT.TOTAL PARKING REQUIREDTOTAL PARKING PROVIDEDSTANDARD SPACESHC SPACESCLEAN AIR/VAN POOL/EP PROVIDEDFUTURE EV SPACES PROVIDEDBICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED (SHORT-TERM)16 STALLS18 STALLS15 STALLS02 STALLS01 STALLS01 STALLS2CAR WASH BLDG. AREA 1,105 SQ.FT.TOTAL BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED (MIN. 10% OF 272 PROVIDED PARKING)27TOTAL BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED305'TYP.169'TYP.9'TYP.9'TYP.9'TYP.9'TYP.9'TYP.TYP.32323210'SB10'SB12'PARKWAY8'(SIDEWALK WIDTH)313TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 247 STALLSTOTAL PARKING PROVIDEDPERCENTAGE OF PARKING SPACES IN EXCESS OF MIN. REQUIRED269 STALLS9%34TYP.3434TYP.34TYP.3636RESTAURANT BLDG AREA2,800 SQ.FT.262618TYP.18TYP.2627TYP.27TYP.2627TYP.272726TYP.SITE PLAN SHEET INDEX1. MASONRY TRASH ENCLOSURE w/ DECORATIVE BLOCK, SOLID TRELLIS FEATURE AND INTERNAL DRAIN.TRASH ENCLOSURE TO COMPLY w/ ALL NEW STATE OF CALIFORNIA & CITY REQUIREMENTS. REFER TODETAIL A/SPD2.02. 6" LANDSCAPE CURB TYPICAL. REFER TO DETAIL F/SPD1.03. LANDSCAPED AREA. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS4. 9'-0" W x 19'-0" D PARKING STALLS PAINTED PER CITY'S REQUIREMENTS.5. PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS, RAMP (WHERE OCCURS) TO COMPLY WITH STATE ANDFEDERAL STANDARDS. REFER TO DETAIL A/SPD1.0.6. PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL (DASHED LINE). 5% MAX. SLOPE IN DIRECTIONOF TRAVEL & 2% MAX. CROSS-SLOPE.7. ASPHALT PARKING LOT AND DRIVE AISLES PER CITY OF SAN JACINTO STANDARDS. REFER TO CIVILPLANS.8. CONCRETE SIDEWALK. G.C. TO ENSURE 5% MAX. SLOPE & 2% MAX. CROSS-SLOPE REFER TO DETAILSH/SPD1.0 & I/SPD1.0.9.PROPOSED LOCATION OF POSSIBLE FUTURE ATM DRIVE-THRU MACHINE LOCATION. SHOWN FORREFERENCE ONLY. NOT A PART OF THIS PERMIT.10.PROPOSED LOCATION OF POSSIBLE FUTURE ATM DRIVE-THRU DIRECTIONAL SIGN. SHOWN FORREFERENCE ONLY. NOT A PART OF THIS PERMIT.11. APPROXIMATE MONUMENT SIGN LOCATION PER CITY OF SAN JACINTO STANDARDS . SHOWN FORREFERENCE ONLY. NOT A PART OF THIS PERMIT. REFER TO "SEPARATE PERMIT NOTE" ON SHEET T1.0.12. PARKING LOT LIGHTING. SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT.13. 6' HIGH CMU WALL ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONE.14. PROPOSED RAISED MEDIAN.15. DECORATIVE PAVING AT ACCESSIBLE ROUTES (PATTERN TBD).16. BICYCLE PARKING SPACES REQ'D PER CALGREEN CODE (REFER TO PARKING ANALYSIS). BICYCLEPARKING SHALL COMPLY WITH CGC SEC. 5.106.4. REFER TO DETAIL J/SPD1.0.17. PROPOSED 10' LONG x 48" WIDE PLANTER AREA ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES. CENTER BETWEENSPACES AS SHOWN. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS.18. DESIGNATED PARKING FOR ANY COMBINATION OF LOW-EMITTING, FUEL-EFFICIENT AND CARPOOL/VANPOOL VEHICLES (REFER TO PARKING ANALYSIS). PARKING STALL MARKING: PAINT, IN THE PAINT USEDFOR THE STALL STRIPPING, THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERS SUCH THAT THE LOWER EDGE OF THE LASTWORD ALIGNS WITH THE END OF THE STALL STRIPING AND IS VISIBLE BENEATH A PARKED VEHICLE :CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/EV.19. 5' SQ. LANDSCAPE DIAMOND w/ 6" CONCRETE CURB.20. PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP, RAMP TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND FEDERAL STANDARDS.REFER TO CIVIL PLANS AND DETAIL L/SPD1.0.21.PROPOSED TRANSFORMER LOCATION, LOCATION TO BE COORDINATED w/ UTILITY CO. REFER TO CIVILPLANS.22. CONCRETE TO ASPHALT TRANSITION.23. DECORATIVE TRELLIS.24. INSTALL HANDICAP ACCESSIBILITY SIGN AT SITE ENTRANCE. REFER TO DETAIL G/SPD1.0.25. INSTALL DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE AT "ZERO CURB" AREAS. REFER TO DETAIL K/SPD1.0 ANDCIVIL PLANS.26. FUTURE LOCATION OF ELECTRICAL VEHICLE SUPPLY EQUIPMENT (EVSE). REFER TO POWER PLAN FOREVSE REQUIREMENTS. FUTURE CHARGING SPACES QUALIFY AS DESIGNATED PARKING FOR CLEAN AIRVEHICLES (CGC 5.106.5.3.5).27. FUTURE LOCATION OF POTENTIAL ELECTRICAL VEHICLE CHARGING STATION (EVCS). FUTURECHARGING SPACES QUALIFY AS DESIGNATED PARKING FOR CLEAN AIR VEHICLES (CGC 5.106.5.3.5).28. PROPOSED WATER METER LOCATION.29. PROPOSED GAS METER LOCATION.30. 10'x25' LOADING ZONE.31. PROPOSED 22' LONG x 48" WIDE PLANTER AREA ADJACENT TO DRIVE ISLE. REFER TO LANDSCAPEPLANS.32. DECORATIVE PAVING AT DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES (PATTERN TBD).33. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXITING RAISED MEDIAN.34. UNDERGROUND RETENTION SYSTEM PER CIVIL PLANS.35. BUILDING COLUMNS/ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS. REFER TO FLOOR PLANS & EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS36. GAS STATION CANOPY, BY OTHERS. SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY.37. LONG-TERM BICYCLE PARKING TO COMPLY w/ CGC SEC. 5.106.4.1.2. BICYCLE PARKING BY CYCLE SAFE,MODEL #PRO-PARK BIKE, DBL TIER - OR APPROVED EQUAL.38. -39. APPROX. LOCATION OF BUS STOP w/ 8'x20' SIDEWALK PAD CONNECTED TO BUS SHELTER. BY RIVERSIDETRANSIT AGENCY - 17' NON-AD CUSTOM DOME RTA BUS SHELTER, OR APPROVED EQUAL.40. (E) PORK-CHOP TO BE REMOVED.41. (E) MEDIAN TO BE MODIFIED.#35TYP.35TYP.37373737371637SHORT-TERM BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED18LONG-TERM BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED12DESCRIPTIONPLAN SUBMITTAL LOGPLAN DATEPLANNING DEPT. SUBMITTAL - 1st REVIEW08-28-18PLANNING DEPT. SUBMITTAL - 2nd REVIEW10-22-183915'L.S.57'-6"32'
50'
18'
6'55'43'45'8'8'8'25'SCENIC S.B.73'2'PROPOSED 2' R.O.W.DEDICATION12'PARKWAY8'(SIDEWALK WIDTH)25'SCENIC S.B.45'27'27'30'52'4010'25'15'25'30'8'10'25'15'25'48'12'12'12'12'48'12'12'12'12'57'-6"20'41PLANNING DEPT. SUBMITTAL - 3rd REVIEW06-06-19304.1.g
Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: 07 - Project Plans (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
PARKING
60'243'60'CLEAN A
IR
/VANPOOL / EV
CL
VAN
CL
VANEV
50'32'18'10' DRAINAGEEASEMENT20' SEWEREASEMENT4' WIDEDRAINAGECHANNELUNDERSIDEWALKDRAINNOPARKINGNOPARKINGCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVEVEVEVEVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVEVEVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVLOADING ZONELLLLLLLLLLLLLL1.62.1
2
.
5
2.3
2
.
7
3
.
0
2.9
3
.
3
2.8
3
.
3
3
.
5
3.1
3
.
4
3
.
5
3
.
3
3.5
3
.
8
3
.
6
3
.
1
3.0
3
.
4
4
.
5
3
.
8
3
.
1
2
.
5
2
.
1
1
.
7
1
.
4
1
.
1
3.0
3
.
3
3
.
8
4
.
0
3
.
2
2
.
7
2
.
2
1
.
7
1
.
4
1
.
1
0
.
8
3.1
3
.
5
3
.
6
3
.
7
0
.
6
2.2
2
.
8
3
.
4
3
.
6
2.0
2
.
6
3
.
0
3
.
3
1.7 2.3 2.8 3.11.8 2.0 2.5 2.72.0 2.2 2.42.0 2.1 2.22.1 2.2 2.22.2 2.2 2.22.3 2.3 2.3 2.22.5 2.4 2.32.6 2.6 2.52.8 2.7 2.53.0 2.93.2 3.2 3.0
3.4
3
.
5
3.6
3
.
6
3
.
6
3.9
3
.
9
3
.
7
4.0
4
.
0
4.0
4
.
2
3
.
9
4.3
4
.
2
3
.
7
4.6
4
.
2
4.8
4
.
0
4.3
4
.
3
3
.
7
4.3
4
.
1
3
.
7
4.2
4
.
1
3
.
6
4.2
4
.
1
4.0
3
.
8
3.9
3
.
4
3.7
3
.
2
3.6
3
.
5
2
.
9
3.5 3.2 2.63.3 3.0 2.53.2 3.0 2.53.2 3.03.2 2.93.2 3.03.2 3.03.3 3.13.6 3.4 3.23.7 3.6 3.34.0 3.9 3.54.3 4.1 3.6
4.6
4
.
3
4.8
4
.
4
5.1
4
.
6
5.3
5
.
2
4
.
8
5.3
5
.
2
4
.
9
5.3
5
.
4
4
.
9
5.6
5
.
7
5.2
6
.
0
5
.
7
5.5
5
.
7
5
.
4
5.6
5
.
6
5.5
5
.
7
5
.
5
5.6
5
.
7
4.9
5
.
5
5
.
4
5.0
5
.
3
4.6
5
.
0
5
.
2
4.2
4
.
5
4
.
9
4.3 4.5 4.74.2 4.4 4.54.2 4.3 4.44.3 4.3 4.24.4 4.3 4.24.6 4.24.9 4.6 4.15.1 5.0 4.55.2 4.9 4.45.3 5.4 4.95.4 5.3 4.75.5 5.3 5.1
5.6
5
.
1
5.4
5
.
7
4
.
7
5.4
5
.
1
4
.
4
4.9
4
.
6
4.6
4
.
6
4
.
4
4.4
4
.
6
4
.
3
4.3
4
.
5
4
.
0
4.2
4
.
2
4.3
4
.
0
4.3
4
.
0
4.3
3
.
8
3.6
3
.
6
3
.
5
3
.
5
3
.
4
3
.
4
3
.
6
3
.
7
4
.
0
4.2
3
.
7
3.8
3
.
8
3
.
8
3
.
9
4
.
3
4
.
6
4
.
2
4
.
2
4
.
1
4
.
2
4
.
1
4
.
1
3
.
7
3
.
7
4
.
1
4
.
0
4
.
2
3
.
9
3.6
3
.
7
3
.
9
4
.
0
4
.
2
4
.
2
4
.
2
4
.
2
4
.
0
4
.
0
3
.
9
3
.
3
3
.
4
4
.
0
4
.
0
3
.
8
3
.
9
4
.
0
4
.
1
4
.
2
4
.
1
3.7
3
.
9
3
.
7
3
.
7
3
.
9
4
.
1
4
.
3
4
.
2
4.2
4
.
4
4
.
1
4.1
4
.
3
4
.
0
4.2 4.3 3.94.2 4.2 3.84.0 4.03.9 4.13.2 4.1 4.03.8 4.7 3.94.0 4.43.8 4.0 4.04.5 4.3 3.94.74.14.04.3 4.24.14.5 4.4
4.9
4
.
84.55.2
5
.
0
5.2
5.4
5.0
5.7
5
.
5
5.5
5.8
5
.
6
5.6
5.7
5.2
5.5
5.8
5.0
5.7
5.9
5.0
6
.
3
4.6
5.1
5.8
4.7
5
.
1
5.2
4.8
4
.
9
4.7
4.6
4.1
4
.
4
4.3
4.0
4
.
0
3
.
9
3.7
3
.
7
3.4 3.43.2 3.23.0 3.02.8 2.9 2.92.7 2.8 2.82.7 2.7 2.72.7 2.7 2.62.7 2.7 2.62.7 2.72.7 2.82.8 2.93.0 3.1
3.1
3
.
2
3
.
1
3.3
3
.
4
3
.
1
3.5
3
.
6
3.6
3
.
4
3.7
3
.
5
3
.
1
4.0
3
.
3
2
.
9
3.8
4.1
3.0
3.2
3
.
7
3
.
4
2.8
3
.
4
3
.
6
3
.
2
3.0
3
.
3
3
.
3
2.0
2
.
5
2
.
9
3
.
2
1.6
2
.
0
2
.
4
2
.
7
1.3
1
.
6
2
.
0
2
.
3
0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.9 2.6 3.2 3.94.44.3 3.6 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.3 2.0 1.9 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.1 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.3 0.8 0.40.4 0.6 0.8 1.3 2.2 2.7 3.1 3.8 4.64.53.7 3.3 3.4 3.3 2.9 2.5 2.4 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.6 2.7 3.1 3.3 3.2 2.9 2.6 2.6 3.0 2.7 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.2 1.6 0.9 0.50.7 1.0 1.1 1.7 2.6 3.0 3.3 4.0 4.94.73.9 3.6 3.8 3.7 3.2 2.9 3.1 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.2 3.1 3.5 3.8 3.7 3.4 3.1 3.3 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.3 2.9 2.7 2.6 1.8 1.0 0.61.2 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.63.2 3.3 4.04.55.3 5.14.54.1 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.8 4.3 4.8 5.3 4.8 4.2 3.6 3.0 2.8 2.0 1.1 0.61.6 1.9 1.9 1.7 1.03.44.4 4.53.7 3.8 4.04.7 4.74.0 3.1 2.91.9 2.3 2.2 1.8 1.02.4 3.0 3.1 3.7 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.3 3.9 3.5 3.8 3.9 3.6 3.6 4.0 4.6 4.0 3.5 3.02.5 2.6 2.5 2.0 1.02.1 2.6 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.1 3.0 3.4 3.6 3.3 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.0 2.8 2.63.4 3.3 3.0 2.2 1.01.9 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.4 2.6 3.0 3.2 2.8 2.5 2.5 2.9 2.6 2.9 2.5 2.2 2.33.84.43.7 2.4 1.21.5 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.3 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.3 2.0 2.1 2.2 1.9 2.2 2.1 1.8 1.84.8 4.8 4.1 2.7 1.31.2 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.24.2 4.6 3.9 2.6 1.21.2 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.8 2.0 1.6 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.23.5 3.6 3.3 2.3 1.11.6 1.8 1.8 1.8 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.2 2.0 2.1 2.3 1.9 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.92.8 2.8 2.6 2.1 1.01.9 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.2 2.8 2.5 2.5 2.9 2.6 2.8 2.5 2.3 2.42.1 2.4 2.3 1.9 1.02.2 2.6 2.7 2.9 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.2 3.0 3.1 3.5 3.6 3.2 3.0 3.1 3.4 3.2 3.4 3.0 2.8 2.82.0 1.7 0.92.5 3.0 3.2 3.8 4.24.7 4.54.2 3.8 3.5 3.8 4.0 3.6 3.7 4.04.54.64.43.9 3.4 3.21.7 1.6 0.92.5 3.0 3.44.45.0 6.2 6.0 5.04.53.7 3.9 4.1 3.8 4.1 4.85.5 4.74.0 3.41.3 1.2 0.82.5 3.0 3.3 4.04.55.2 5.24.54.1 3.6 3.9 4.0 3.7 3.84.44.85.45.0 4.3 3.80.2 0.7 1.0 0.9 0.62.3 2.8 2.8 3.2 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.3 3.2 3.6 3.8 3.4 3.2 3.4 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.40.5 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.72.1 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.8 3.2 3.4 3.0 2.7 2.7 3.1 2.8 3.1 2.91.0 1.3 1.4 1.3 0.81.9 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.6 2.4 2.6 2.6 2.3 2.5 2.8 3.0 2.5 2.2 2.3 2.6 2.3 2.61.4 1.8 1.8 1.6 0.91.8 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.3 1.8 2.0 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.5 2.5 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.8 1.51.7 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.01.9 2.1 1.9 2.1 2.5 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.1 1.4 1.3 1.5 2.02.1 2.4 2.4 1.9 1.02.0 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.0 2.6 2.8 3.13.0 2.9 2.7 2.1 1.12.3 2.6 2.6 2.8 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.2 2.5 3.2 3.5 3.53.6 3.9 3.4 2.3 1.12.5 2.9 3.1 3.7 4.14.44.3 3.9 3.4 3.0 3.0 2.6 2.4 2.7 3.1 3.9 4.64.44.6 4.0 2.6 1.32.6 3.1 3.54.45.0 6.15.7 4.74.1 3.3 3.3 3.0 2.7 2.7 3.1 3.94.54.6 5.14.8 4.8 4.1 2.7 1.32.6 3.1 3.4 4.2 4.85.55.34.54.0 3.3 3.4 3.2 2.9 2.8 3.0 3.7 4.1 4.14.43.7 4.2 3.6 2.4 1.22.8 2.9 3.3 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.5 3.2 3.0 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.9 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.9 3.63.2 3.1 2.9 2.2 1.12.6 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.5 2.1 2.4 2.82.4 2.5 2.5 2.0 1.22.8 2.7 2.7 2.4 2.3 2.3 1.5 1.6 2.01.8 2.2 2.1 1.8 1.2 0.6 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.7 2.0 2.5 3.1 3.3 3.1 3.0 3.1 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.0 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.1 0.9 1.01.5 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.1 0.6 0.7 1.1 1.6 1.9 2.3 2.6 3.2 3.8 3.9 3.5 3.1 2.8 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.4 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.61.4 1.4 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.1 2.5 2.9 4.6 4.2 3.2 2.7 2.3 2.0 1.6 1.00.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 1.1 1.6 1.9 5.1 4.2 3.4 2.6 2.2 1.8 1.4
10'40'60'30'
30'
20'
20'
10'71''22'9'NOPARKINGNO
PARKING
NOPARKING
NOPARKING
60'243'60'156'40'70'79'40'33'-6"91'CLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EV
CLEAN AIR /
VANPOOL / EV
CLEAN
AIR /
VANP
OO
L
/
EV
CLE
AN AIR /
VANP
OO
L / EV
CLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EV
NOPARKINGN89°40'37"E475.77'N20°18'3
0
"
W
327.78'415.62'295.24'N89°46'00"E154.20'N89°46'00"ES28°4
3'
0
0"
E
321.01'N61°17'00"E227.37'N64°27'13"E228.55'N61°17'00"E321.37'S28°4
3'
0
0"
E
155.00'N89°40'37"E309.43'N87°10'11"E137.25'N00°19'23"W
296.69'591.94'L=398.96'R=950.00'L=482.47'R=900.00'L =3 6 4 .2 1 'R =2 0 7 1 .0 0 'L =2 8 9 .0 9 'C2C6C1C32L=4896'.L=15000'.2L=1324'.L=18572'.L =3 0 0 .4 5 '88.58'S10°20'56"E
N 89°40'37" E456.21'N61°17'00"E263.02'252.84'334.55'257.39'PARCEL 8PARCEL 9PARCEL 2(OLD PARCEL 1)PMB 131/60-63(OLD PARCEL 2)PMB 131/60-63(OLD PARCEL 8)PMB 131/60-63(OLD PARCEL 9)PMB 131/60-63174.71'S20°09'0
2
"
E
N28°4
3'
0
0"
W
243.75'
71.26'N28°43'
0
0"
W
N02°49'49"W 280.88'
242.99'L1L3L4L2417.28'PARCEL 1CLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EV
CLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EV
CLEA
N AIR /VANPOOL /
E
V
CLEAN AI
R
/
VANP
OOL / EV
CLEAN A
IR /
VANPOOL / EV
CLE
AN AIR /
VANPO
OL / EV
EVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEVEV50'32'18'10' DRAINAGEEASEMENT20' SEWEREASEMENT4' WIDE DRAINAGECHANNEL6' BLOCK WALL10' DRAINAGEEASEMENT20' SEWEREASEMENT4' WIDEDRAINAGECHANNELUNDERSIDEWALKDRAIN4' WIDEDRAINAGECHANNEL10'DRAINAGEEASEMENTNOPARKINGNOPARKINGCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVEVEVEVEVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVEVEVVVVVLOADING ZONELOADING ZONELLLYY
YY60'243'N89°40'37"E475.77'N20°18'3
0
"
W
327.78'415.62'N89°46'00"E154.20'N89°46'00"EN00°19'23"W
296.69'L=398.96'R=950.00'L=482.47'2L=4896'.L=15000'.2L=1324'.L=18572'.88.58'S10°20'56"E
N 89°40'37" E456 21'
334.55'(OLD PARCEL 1)PMB 131/60-63174.71'S20°09'0
2
"
E
71.26'N28°43'
0
0"
W
417.28'PARCEL 150'32'18'10' DRAINAGEEASEMENT20' SEWEREASEMENT4' WIDEDRAINAGECHANNELUNDERSIDEWALKDRAINNOPARKINGNOPARKINGCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVEVEVEVEVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVEVEVVVVVLOADING ZONELLLSITE PLAN (PARCEL 1)B1"=20'-0"BILL SPECK10073 VALLEY VIEW ST.CYPRESS, CA 90630PHONE: 714-606-9141e-mail: allspeckslnc@yahoo.comCopyright 2016, MPA Architects, Inc.. All rights reserved.cDESCRIPTIONREVISIONSNO.DATEPROJECTCLIENTA PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT:F. 619.236.0557AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTSwww.mpa-architects.comMEMBERSan Diego, CA 92104V. 619.236.05953578 30th StreetM P A A R C H I T E C T S I N C .DATABASE:SHEET NUMBER:SCALE:SHEET TITLECHECKED BY:PROJECT NO:17069-L. DALEPLOT DATE:DRAWN BY:AS NOTED-1706906-30-19LUISENO VILLAGES.E.C. HWY 79 AND MAIN ST.SAN JACINTO, CA 92583LICENSEDARCHITEC T
S TATEOOFCALIFRNIANHOJRUMSE Y
C26819Exp. 3-31-2019SP1.1SITE PLAN -PARCEL 1PRELIM. WOOD TRELLIS CONCEPTCN.T.S.OVERALL SITE PLANA1"=80'-0"FUTURECONVENIENCE STORE3,048 S.F.(NOT A PAT)1111242424615615615615NOTE:ALL SITE PLAN DESIGN FEATURES AND INFRASTRUCTURE BEYONDPARCEL 1 (INCLUDING BUT LIMITED TO: CONCRETE CURBS, PARKINGLOT, SITE LIGHTING, TRASH ENCLOSURE, STORM WATER SYSTEM,AND LANDSCAPE) ARE PART OF A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, UNDERA SEPARATE PERMIT AND SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY.FUTURECAR WASH1,105 S.F.(NOT A PAT)FUTURE DRIVE-THRURESTAURANT (PAD IV)3,200 S.F.(NOT A PAT)FUTURERETAIL (PAD II)9,360 S.F.(NOT A PAT)BSP1.0615PROPOSEDRETAIL (PAD I)14,583 S.F.FUTURE DRIVE-THRURESTAURANT (PAD III)2,800 S.F.(NOT A PAT)SITE PLAN KEY NOTES1. MASONRY TRASH ENCLOSURE w/ DECORATIVE BLOCK, SOLID TRELLIS FEATURE AND INTERNAL DRAIN. TRASHENCLOSURE TO COMPLY w/ ALL NEW STATE OF CALIFORNIA & CITY REQUIREMENTS2. 6" LANDSCAPE CURB TYPICAL.3. LANDSCAPED AREA. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS4. 9'-0" W x 19'-0" D PARKING STALLS PAINTED PER CITY'S REQUIREMENTS.5. PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS, RAMP (WHERE OCCURS) TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND FEDERALSTANDARDS.6. PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL (DASHED LINE). 5% MAX. SLOPE IN DIRECTION OFTRAVEL & 2% MAX. CROSS-SLOPE.7. ASPHALT PARKING LOT AND DRIVE AISLES PER CITY OF SAN JACINTO STANDARDS. REFER TO CIVIL PLANS.8. CONCRETE SIDEWALK. G.C. TO ENSURE 5% MAX. SLOPE & 2% MAX. CROSS-SLOPE9. -10. -11. APPROXIMATE MONUMENT SIGN LOCATION PER CITY OF SAN JACINTO STANDARDS . SHOWN FOR REFERENCEONLY. NOT A PART OF THIS PERMIT. REFER TO "SEPARATE PERMIT NOTE" ON SHEET T1.0.12. PARKING LOT LIGHTING. REFER TO SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN13. 6' HIGH CMU WALL ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONE.14. PROPOSED RAISED MEDIAN.15. DECORATIVE PAVING AT ACCESSIBLE ROUTES (PATTERN TBD).16. BICYCLE PARKING SPACES REQ'D PER CALGREEN CODE (REFER TO PARKING ANALYSIS). BICYCLE PARKINGSHALL COMPLY WITH CGC SEC. 5.106.4.17. PROPOSED 10' LONG x 48" WIDE PLANTER AREA ADJACENT TO PARKING SPACES. CENTER BETWEEN SPACESAS SHOWN. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS.18. DESIGNATED PARKING FOR ANY COMBINATION OF LOW-EMITTING, FUEL-EFFICIENT AND CARPOOL/VAN POOLVEHICLES (REFER TO PARKING ANALYSIS). PARKING STALL MARKING: PAINT, IN THE PAINT USED FOR THESTALL STRIPPING, THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERS SUCH THAT THE LOWER EDGE OF THE LAST WORD ALIGNSWITH THE END OF THE STALL STRIPING AND IS VISIBLE BENEATH A PARKED VEHICLE : CLEAN AIR/ VANPOOL/EV.19. 5' SQ. LANDSCAPE DIAMOND w/ 6" CONCRETE CURB.20. PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP, RAMP TO COMPLY WITH STATE AND FEDERAL STANDARDS. REFER TOCIVIL PLANS21.PROPOSED TRANSFORMER LOCATION, LOCATION TO BE COORDINATED w/ UTILITY CO. REFER TO CIVIL PLANS.22. CONCRETE TO ASPHALT TRANSITION.23. DECORATIVE TRELLIS, REFER TO DETAIL C ON THIS SHEET24. INSTALL HANDICAP ACCESSIBILITY SIGN AT SITE ENTRANCE.25. INSTALL DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE AT "ZERO CURB" AREAS.26. FUTURE LOCATION OF POTENTIAL ELECTRICAL VEHICLE SUPPLY EQUIPMENT (EVSE). REFER TO POWER PLANFOR EVSE REQUIREMENTS.27. FUTURE LOCATION OF POTENTIAL ELECTRICAL VEHICLE CHARGING STATION (EVCS). POTENTIAL FUTURECHARGING SPACES QUALIFY AS DESIGNATED PARKING FOR CLEAN AIR VEHICLES (CGC 5.106.5.3.5).28. PROPOSED WATER METER LOCATION. REFER TO PLUMBING PLANS.29. PROPOSED GAS METER LOCATION. REFER TO PLUMBING PLANS.30. 10'x25' LOADING ZONE.31. PROPOSED 22' LONG x 48" WIDE PLANTER AREA ADJACENT TO DRIVE ISLE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS.32. DECORATIVE PAVING AT DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES (PATTERN TBD).33. -34. UNDERGROUND RETENTION SYSTEM PER CIVIL PLANS.35. BUILDING COLUMNS/ARCHITECTURAL PROJECTIONS. REFER TO FLOOR PLANS & EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS36. -37. LONG-TERM BICYCLE PARKING TO COMPLY w/ CGC SEC. 5.106.4.1.2. BICYCLE PARKING BY CYCLE SAFE, MODEL#PRO-PARK BIKE, DBL TIER - OR APPROVED EQUAL.38. -39. APPROX. LOCATION OF BUS STOP w/ 8'x20' SIDEWALK PAD CONNECTED TO BUS SHELTER. BY RIVERSIDETRANSIT AGENCY - 17' NON-AD CUSTOM DOME RTA BUS SHELTER, OR APPROVED EQUAL.PAD 'I'14,583 S.F.2TYP.2TYP.2TYP.2TYP.3TYP.3TYP.615667TYP.7TYP.7TYP.7TYP.7TYP.7TYP.8TYP.8TYP.3TYP.1618182020TYP.26272425TYP.5'-0"1758TYP.43'-6"4'-0"10'-6"20'-0"30'-0"8'-0"10'-0"S.B.26'-0"19'-0"13'-6"54'-0"6'-0"5'-0"6'-0"54'-0"6'-0"54'-0"6'-0"45'-0"14'-6 1/2"13'-6"12'-0"TYP.8TYP.61515TYP.30'-0"11'-0"151130'-0"15'-0"15'-0"30'-0"19'-0"26'-0"38'-0"26'-0"19'-0"16'-9"19'-0"TYP.19'-0"TYP.32'-6"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"5'-0"TYP.5'-0"TYP.194TYP.4TYP.3TYP.2TYP.3TYP.615TYP.6'-0"
PARKWAY
6'-0"
SIDEWALK
12'-0"
LS SETBACK 231430'-0"5'-0"4'-0"295'-0"30'-0"8'-0"20'-0"3015'-0"15'-0"20'-0"41'-0"15'-0"4'-0"TYP.10'-0"TYP.22'-0"3122'-0"318'-0"5'-0"6131618186'-0"3235TYP.35TYP.35TYP.35TYP.35TYP.3434TYP.1827526'-0"3737373911203TYP.19194TYP.9'-0"TYP.9'-0"TYP.9'-0"TYP.31717172TYP.2TYP.2TYP.12TYP.12TYP.12TYP.12TYP.12TYP.18272625'-0"10'-0"25'-0"15'-0"16'-0"20'-0"7'-0"224.1.g
Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: 07 - Project Plans (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
2121KJIHGFEDCBAKJIHGFEDCBALOADING ZONEFLOOR PLANA1/8"=1'-0"
101SPACE "101"(FUTURE TENANT)2,141 S.F. 103SPACE "103"(FUTURE TENANT)1,430 S.F. 105SPACE "105"(FUTURE TENANT)1,200 S.F. 107SPACE "107"(FUTURE TENANT)1,200 S.F. 109SPACE "109"(FUTURE TENANT)1,200 S.F. 111SPACE "111"(FUTURE TENANT)1,200 S.F. 113SPACE "113"(FUTURE TENANT)1,200 S.F. 115SPACE "115"(FUTURE TENANT)1,200 S.F. 117SPACE "117"(FUTURE TENANT)1,430 S.F. 119SPACE "119"(FUTURE TENANT)2,261 S.F.AA2.0DA2.0CA2.0BA2.0PROPOSED PAD BUILDING14,582.50 SQ. FT.BILL SPECK10073 VALLEY VIEW ST.CYPRESS, CA 90630PHONE: 714-606-9141e-mail: allspeckslnc@yahoo.comCopyright 2016, MPA Architects, Inc.. All rights reserved.cDESCRIPTIONREVISIONSNO.DATEPROJECTCLIENTA PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT:F. 619.236.0557AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTSwww.mpa-architects.comMEMBERSan Diego, CA 92104V. 619.236.05953578 30th StreetM P A A R C H I T E C T S I N C .DATABASE:SHEET NUMBER:SCALE:SHEET TITLECHECKED BY:PROJECT NO:17069-L. DALEPLOT DATE:DRAWN BY:AS NOTED-1706906-30-19LUISENO VILLAGES.E.C. HWY 79 AND MAIN ST.SAN JACINTO, CA 92583LICENSEDARCHITEC T
S TATEOOFCALIFRNIANHOJRUMSE Y
C26819Exp. 3-31-2019A1.1FLOOR PLANCA3.0EFBDCDEFFAA3.0 A3.0 A3.0A3.0A3.0A3.0 A3.0 A3.0A3.0A3.03'-11"3'-7"12'-0"22'-9 1/4"9'-0"4'-8"9'-0"11'-0"9'-0"8'-7"9'-0"8'-9"12'-0"4'-4"12'-0"8'-9"9'-0"8'-7"9'-0"11'-0"9'-0"4'-8"9'-0"22'-9 1/4"12'-0"3'-7"19'-1"3'-11"11'-6 1/4"3'-0"12'-6 1/2"3'-0"12'-8"3'-0"3'-7"13'-1"3'-7"13'-1"2'-7"3'-11"30'-1 1/2"3'-5 1/2"2'-7"13'-1"3'-7"13'-1"3'-7"3'-0"12'-8"3'-0"12'-6 1/2"3'-0"11'-6 1/4"3'-11"19'-1"3'-11"3'-7"3'-7"37'-8 1/4"23'-10"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"20'-0"23'-10"37'-8 1/4"243'-0 1/2"243'-0 1/2"60'-0"14'-9"2'-8"16'-8"2'-8"6'-3 1/2"3'-11"20'-8 1/2"3'-11"11'-7"5'-9 1/2"4'-0"4'-0"2'-0"3'-11"20'-8 1/2"3'-11"6'-3 1/2"2'-8"16'-8"2'-8"14'-9"26'-9"5'-9 1/2"4'-0"1'-6"4'-0"1'-6"4'-0"11'-7"60'-0"12'-0"4'-0"7'-5"TYP.7'-0"TYP. 201ELECT. ROOM89 S.F. 203FIRE RISER ROOM89 S.F.7'-5"TYP.7'-0"TYP.EXTERIOR STUD WALLS - NON RATED2x6 STUDS @ 16" O/C, w/ R-19 BATT INSULATIONEXTERIOR STUD WALL - POP-OUT ELEMENTS2x4 STUDS @ 16" O/CFLOOR PLAN WALL LEGENDFLOOR PLAN SHEET INDEX57318642PROPOSED TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT LOCATION. REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANSPROPOSED FIRE RISER LOCATION13ELECTRICAL PANELS. REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANSELECTRICAL SUB-PANEL PER ELECTRICAL PLANS. VERIFY PANEL LOCATION w/ FUTURE TENANTPRIOR TO INSTALLATIONROOF ACCESS LADDER AND HATCH. REFER TO DETAIL D/AD1.0STOREFRONT SYSTEM. REFER TO SHEET A4.0NOT USED.910APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF RECESSED KNOX BOX (3200 SERIES). VERIFY REQUIREMENTSw/ FIRE DEPT.PERIMETER OF AWNING. REFER TO REFLECTED CEILING PLAN & EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS1112-14--15-MAIN AND U.G. PULL SECTION, SW. BRD. METERS. REFER TO SINGLE LINE DIAGRAMINTERIOR STUD WALLS - NON RATEDINTERIOR DEMISING STUD WALLS - NON-RATED6" METAL STUDS @ 16" O/C, w/ 5/8" GYP. BOARD BOTH SIDES6" METAL STUDS @ 16" O/C, w/ 5/8" GYP. BOARD BOTH SIDES5TYP.431710-1069TYP.10TYP.INTERIOR STUD WALLS - NON RATED3 5/8" METAL STUDS @ 16" O/C, w/ 5/8" GYP. BOARD BOTH SIDES28'-3 1/4"3'-0"21'-2 1/2"3'-0"3'-7"12'-7"3'-7"12'-7"3'-7"60'-3"3'-7"12'-7"3'-7"12'-7"3'-7"3'-0"21'-2 1/2"3'-0"28'-3 1/4"2'-0"2'-0"1'-0"4.1.g
Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: 07 - Project Plans (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
KJIHGFEDCBA2112ABCDEFGHIJKEAST ELEVATIONA1/8"=1'-0"WEST ELEVATIOND1/8"=1'-0"SOUTH ELEVATIONB1/8"=1'-0"NORTH ELEVATIONC1/8"=1'-0"0'-0"T.O. FINISH FLOOR0'-0"T.O. FINISH FLOOR0'-0"T.O. FINISH FLOOR0'-0"T.O. FINISH FLOOR123.5123.5CAEFBDCDEAA3.0FFA3.0 A3.0 A3.0 A3.0A3.0A3.0A3.0 A3.0 A3.0A3.0A3.0BILL SPECK10073 VALLEY VIEW ST.CYPRESS, CA 90630PHONE: 714-606-9141e-mail: allspeckslnc@yahoo.comCopyright 2016, MPA Architects, Inc.. All rights reserved.cDESCRIPTIONREVISIONSNO.DATEPROJECTCLIENTA PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT:F. 619.236.0557AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTSwww.mpa-architects.comMEMBERSan Diego, CA 92104V. 619.236.05953578 30th StreetM P A A R C H I T E C T S I N C .DATABASE:SHEET NUMBER:SCALE:SHEET TITLECHECKED BY:PROJECT NO:17069-L. DALEPLOT DATE:DRAWN BY:AS NOTED-1706906-30-19LUISENO VILLAGES.E.C. HWY 79 AND MAIN ST.SAN JACINTO, CA 92583LICENSEDARCHITEC T
S TATEOOFCALIFRNIANHOJRUMSE Y
C26819Exp. 3-31-2019A2.0EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSTRASH ENCLOSURE ELVATIONSE1/4"=1'-0"8E4FPRECAST CONC. CAP,COLOR TO MATCHWALL BELOW8x8x16 PRECISION CONCRETEBLOCKS w/ FLUSH JOINTS, w/SKIM COAT STUCCO FINISH,PAINT TO MATCH COLOR-B4x6 @ 24" O/Cw/ H2.5 EA. SIDE, TYP.4x14 BEAM-H-HMETAL GATE-HMETAL RIB ROOFU-PANEL 22 GA. w/ #6SCREWS @ 8" O/C3'-2"6'-0"9'-0"3'-2"6'-0"9'-0"SLOPE ENCLOSURE COVER1/2-INCH PER FOOT MIN.NOTE:BUILDING PARAPETS SHALL SCREEN ALL ROOF TOPMECHANICAL EQUIPMENT.EXTERIOR MATERIALSEXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER WITH SMOOTH FINISHEPS CORNICE / TRIM WITH SMOOTH PLASTER FINISHMETAL AWNINGMANUFACTURED STONE VENEERDECORATIVE WOOD BRACKETS1-2.1-3-4-5-6-7.1-8-9-10-11-12-HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND FRAME, PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENTSURFACESTOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH ALUMINUM FRAME AND CLEAR GLAZING13-EXTERIOR COLORS-A-B-C-D-E-F-G-HELDORADO STONE: MOUNTAIN LEDGE "SHASTA"-J-KINTEGRAL COLOR PLASTER, WITH ELASTOMERIC PAINT TO MATCHSHERWIN-WILLIAMS, DOWNING SLATE #SW2819INTEGRAL COLOR PLASTER, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN-WILLIAMS,MINUTE MAUVE #SW7078INTEGRAL COLOR PLASTER, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN-WILLIAMS,RENWICK ROSE BEIGE #SW2804INTEGRAL COLOR PLASTER, WITH ELASTOMERIC PAINT TO MATCHSHERWIN-WILLIAMS, ROOKWOOD SASH GREEN #SW2810INTEGRAL COLOR PLASTER, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN-WILLIAMS,LEATHER BOUND #SW6118PRECAST COLUMN TRIM CAPPRIMED FOR PAINT SELECT CEDARMILL HARDIE PLANK LAP SIDING w/ SMOOTHFINISH BY JAMES HARDIEDOUBLE EAGLE PONDEROSA FLAT TILE BY EAGLE ROOFING. (ICC-ES REPORT #ESR-1900)987 BROWN GRAY RANGE1ESTAINED WOODMEDIUM OAK COLOR9J4F7.1H2E5--8E2.1E3D5-8E4F1B1B1A1B1C1B5-8E4F2.2E1A7.1H9J11H5-1B8E4F1C2.2E1B5-4F3D1A8E4F1B2.1E8E4F10G1B9J1E1B2.1E2.2E8E5-4F1B16E11H9J7.1H8E10G11H9J7.1H16E1B8E8E5-4F1B2.1E2.2E4F4F6B1B2.1E2.1E1B1C2.2E1A1BINTEGRAL COLOR PLASTER, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN-WILLIAMS,INTELLECTUAL GRAY #SW70451A1A1A1C1B6B6B6B6B6B7.2H8E8E8E1/4" STUCCO REVEAL13-13-14-EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS14H15-72"x96" WALL MOUNTED TRELLIS15D15D15D8E4F2E13-13-2.1E1B1B4F8E2.2ET.O. STOREFRONT@ 9'-6" A.F.F., TYP.B.O. SOFFIT @ 13'-0" A.F.F.T.O. PARAPET @ 23'-6" A.F.F.T.O. PARAPET @ 27'-6" A.F.F.T.O. RIDGE @ ± 32'-1 1/4" A.F.F.T.O. PARAPET @ 23'-6" A.F.F.B.O. SOFFIT @ 13'-0" A.F.F.B.O. SOFFIT @ 14'-6"T.O. PARAPET @ 15'-0" A.F.F.T.O. PARAPET @ 21'-6" A.F.F.T.O. PARAPET @ 27'-6" A.F.F.T.O. PARAPET @ 21'-6" A.F.F.T.O. TRIM @4'-6" A.F.F.T.O. TRIM @3'-2" A.F.F.B.O. SOFFIT @ 10'-6" A.F.F.T.O. PARAPET @ 21'-6" A.F.F.B.O. TRELLIS @9'-0" A.F.F.B.O. SOFFIT @ 12'-0" A.F.F.B.O. SOFFIT @ 14'-0" A.F.F.B.O. SOFFIT @ 14'-0" A.F.F.B.O. SOFFIT @ 12'-0" A.F.F.T.O. PARAPET @ 23'-6" A.F.F.T.O. PARAPET @ 28'-6" A.F.F.T.O. TRIM @ 17'-0" A.F.F.T.O. STOREFRONT@ 9'-6" A.F.F., TYP.T.O. TRIM @3'-2" A.F.F.T.O. STOREFRONT@ 9'-6" A.F.F., TYP.T.O. TRIM @4'-6" A.F.F.T.O. TRIM @3'-2" A.F.F.B.O. SOFFIT @ 14'-0" A.F.F.B.O. SOFFIT @ 12'-0" A.F.F.T.O. PARAPET @ 23'-6" A.F.F. T.O. WINDOW @9'-6" A.F.F.T.O. TRIM @3'-2" A.F.F.EQ.EQ.4'-6"T.O. PARAPET @ 23'-6" A.F.F.T.O. PARAPET @ 15'-0" A.F.F.T.O. PARAPET @ 21'-6" A.F.F.B.O. SOFFIT @ 10'-6" A.F.F. T.O. WINDOW @9'-6" A.F.F.T.O. TRIM @3'-2" A.F.F.EQ.EQ.4'-6"T.O. PARAPET @ 23'-6" A.F.F.EQ.EQ.T.O. PARAPET @ 23'-6" A.F.F.T.O. TRIM @4'-6" A.F.F.T.O. TRIM @3'-2" A.F.F.T.O. PARAPET @ 21'-6" A.F.F.T.O. PARAPET @ 21'-6" A.F.F.B.O. SOFFIT @ 12'-0" A.F.F.B.O. SOFFIT @ 14'-0" A.F.F.T.O. PARAPET @ 23'-6" A.F.F.T.O. TRIM @4'-6" A.F.F.T.O. TRIM @3'-2" A.F.F.4F4F2.1ET.O. RIDGE @ ± 32'-1 1/4" A.F.F.1'-0"19'-6"1'-0"EPS CORNICE / TRIM WITH SMOOTH PLASTER FINISH2.2-16-4"4"4"4"4"4"16E4"4"16EEPS TRIM WITH SMOOTH PLASTER FINISH. 2"D x 5"H(SECURED TO STUCCO WITH ADHESIVE PER MANUFACTURERS SPECS)DECORATIVE WOOD BRACKETS7.2-7.1H1'-6"TYP.1'-0"TYP.1'-6"TYP.1'-0"TYP.EQ.1'-0"TYP.EQ.1'-6"TYP.1'-0"TYP.1'-6"TYP.1'-0"TYP.4.1.g
Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: 07 - Project Plans (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
13SLOPE12"1/2"3SLOPE12"1/2"3SLOPE12"1/2"3SLOPE12"1/2"3SLOPEKSLOPE3SLOPE2121KJIHGFEDCBAKJIHGFEDCBA1BUILDING CROSS SECTIONA1/4"=1'-0"BUILDING CROSS SECTIONC1/4"=1'-0"BUILDING CROSS SECTIOND1/4"=1'-0"BUILDING CROSS SECTIONE1/4"=1'-0"BUILDING CROSS SECTIONF1/4"=1'-0"BUILDING CROSS SECTIONG1/4"=1'-0"BUILDING CROSS SECTIONB1/4"=1'-0"BILL SPECK10073 VALLEY VIEW ST.CYPRESS, CA 90630PHONE: 714-606-9141e-mail: allspeckslnc@yahoo.comCopyright 2016, MPA Architects, Inc.. All rights reserved.cDESCRIPTIONREVISIONSNO.DATEPROJECTCLIENTA PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT:F. 619.236.0557AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTSwww.mpa-architects.comMEMBERSan Diego, CA 92104V. 619.236.05953578 30th StreetM P A A R C H I T E C T S I N C .DATABASE:SHEET NUMBER:SCALE:SHEET TITLECHECKED BY:PROJECT NO:17069-L. DALEPLOT DATE:DRAWN BY:AS NOTED-1706906-30-19LUISENO VILLAGES.E.C. HWY 79 AND MAIN ST.SAN JACINTO, CA 92583LICENSEDARCHITEC T
S TATEOOFCALIFRNIANHOJRUMSE Y
C26819Exp. 3-31-2019A3.0CROSS-SECTIONSSTOREFRONT @ 9'-6" A.F.F.TOP PLATE @ 14'-0" A.F.F.TOP OF PARAPET @ 21'-6" A..F.F.TOP PLATE @ 14'-0" A.F.F.TOP OF PARAPET @ 21'-6" A..F.F.STOREFRONT @ 9'-6" A.F.F.TOP PLATE @ 14'-0" A.F.F.TOP OF PARAPET @ 23'-6" A..F.F.BOT OF SOFFIT @ 12'-0" A.F.F.TOP OF PARAPET @ 28'-6" A..F.F.TOP PLATE @ 14'-0" A.F.F.STOREFRONT @ 9'-6" A.F.F.TOP OF SILL@ 3'-11" A.F.F.TOP OF WINDOW @ 9'-5" A.F.F.BOT OF SOFFIT @ 10'-5" A.F.F.TOP OF POP-OUT @ 15'-0" A..F.F.TOP OF PARAPET @ 20'-0" A..F.F.TOP OF PARAPET @ 27'-6" A..F.F.TOP PLATE @ 14'-0" A.F.F.STOREFRONT @ 9'-6" A.F.F.BOT OF SOFFIT @ 13'-0" A.F.F.TOP OF PARAPET @ 27'-6" A..F.F.TOP PLATE @ 14'-0" A.F.F.STOREFRONT @ 9'-6" A.F.F.BOT OF SOFFIT @ 13'-0" A.F.F.TOP OF RIDGE 32'-6"BOT. OF SOFFIT @ 14'-6" A.F.F.BOT. OF TRUSS @ 15'-6" A.F.F.1'-0"1'-0"1'-0"CA3.0EFBDCDEFFAA3.0 A3.0 A3.0 A3.0 A3.0 A3.0 A3.0 A3.0A3.0A3.0243'-0 1/2"60'-0"11'-7"ROOF PLANH1/16"=1'-0"
1/2:12SLOPEAPPROX. 5,260 SQ.FT.APPROX. 5,060 SQ.FT.APPROX. 5,060 SQ.FT.58'-0"8'-0"8' HIGH CMU WALL5'-6"LINE OF SIGHT78'-0"100'-0"20'-0"LINE OF SIGHT @ WEST P.L.I1/8"=1'-0"TOP PLATE @ 14'-0" A.F.F.TOP OF PARAPET @ 21'-6" A.F.F.4.1.g
Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: 07 - Project Plans (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: 08 - Conceptual Grading Plan (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
SSS60'40'70'33'-6"91'VVVPROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ONRAMONA EXPRESSWAY NORTH OF MAINSTREET BE COMPLETED BY OTHERS.PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ON LAKE PARKDRIVE EAST OF RAMONA EXPRESSWAY TOBE COMPLETED BY OTHERS.SSSSSS79'40'5050 Avenida Encinas, Ste 260Carlsbad, CA 92008Phone: (760) 476-9193 · MBAKERINTL.COMEAST MAIN ST. / LAKE PARK DR.CONCEPTUAL SIGNING &STRIPING PLANSLIMITSPEEDNORIGHTTURNONLYONLYNO4.1.iPacket Pg. 83Attachment: 09 - Signing and Striping Plans (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-4.1.cPacket Pg. 166Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.aPacket Pg. 190Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.aPacket Pg. 145Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.aPacket Pg. 187Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 1 City of San Jacinto
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
FORM
INITIAL STUDY (IS)
1. Project Title: Luiseño Village Retail Center – SPDR 17-17
2. Lead Agency: City of San Jacinto, Planning Department
595 S. San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
(951) 487-7330 – Phone
(951) 654-3728 – Fax
Prepared By: Josh Ferris
Origin Environmental Planning, LLC.
(916) 265-2608
josh@originenvr.com
3. Contact Person Kevin White, Senior Planner
City of San Jacinto, Planning Department
595 S. San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
(951) 487-7330 – Phone
(951) 654-3728 – Fax
kwhite@sanjacintoca.gov
4. Project Location: Southwest corner of Main Street and Ramona Ex-
pressway in the City of San Jacinto as shown in Figure
1. The Project Site is located within an unsectioned
area of the Rancho San Jacinto Viejo land grant, Town-
ship 4 South, Range 1 West (San Bernardino base line
and meridian) as shown on the San Jacinto, California
7.5-minute U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) quadran-
gle. The project site is comprised of 4 parcels with 7
Tax Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs): 433-160-024,
027, 028, 029, 032, 033, and 034.
5. Project Developer & Applicant
Project Developer Property Owner/Applicant
Bill Speck Ruben De Los Santos
All-Specks, Inc. Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians
10073 Valley View St. #101 P.O. Box 487
Cypress, CA 90630 San Jacinto, CA 92581
(714) 606-9141 (951) 654-5544
allspecksinc@yahoo.com RDELOSSANTOS@soboba-nsn.gov
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 2 City of San Jacinto
6. General Plan Designation: CC – Community Commercial
The Community Commercial land use designation provides for a variety of retail and
service-oriented business activities at various intensities to serve the local community
and population, as well as the broader market area. The maximum intensity of devel-
opment is a FAR of 0.40, with an average intensity of a FAR of 0.25. (Figure 2)
a. General Plan Neighborhood Designation: Spice Ranch Neighborhood
Planning Concept
The neighborhood planning concept allows the City to ensure that adequate
levels of public services and facilities are available throughout the commu-
nity and not concentrated in only a few areas.
b. Specific Plan Name and Designation: Not located within a Specific Plan
7. Existing Zoning: CN – Commercial Neighborhood.
The CN Zone is a “Clearly Compatible” Zone with the CC General Plan designation.
The CN zone is applied to areas appropriate for providing small-scale retail and per-
sonal service uses for the local population living in adjacent residential neighborhoods.
This zone allows a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.40. (Figure 3)
8. Description of the Project:
Environmental Setting
The site is vacant and covered with weedy grassland. The project site was histori-
cally used for agriculture but has been fallow and vacant for over 20 years. It has
been mowed and possibly disked occasionally for weed control. The topography is
generally flat with a slight slope down to the northwest. Site elevation ranges from
1,592 to 1,600 feet above mean sea level (MSL). Ramona Expressway and Main
Street are elevated above the site near the intersection of these two streets.
No ponding water or surface seepage was observed at or near the site during field
investigations. Site drainage appears to be controlled via infiltration on the site. A
concrete swale is located along the southern and western boundary of the site which
accepts stormwater flows from Donna Way and drains north to Main Street via a
drain under the sidewalk into the street gutter on the south side of Main Street.
Project Description
The Project is a retail center including a service station with convenience market and
carwash, two drive-through restaurants, and two retail buildings.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 3 City of San Jacinto
Construction of the Project would occur in two or more phases. The first phase would
include a retail building with associated parking and landscaping, a driveway connect-
ing Main Street to Donna Way, and utility and stormwater management improvements.
Construction of the first phase is estimated to start in Fall 2019 and end approximately
in Summer 2020. The remaining land uses would be developed in one or more sub-
sequent phases. Construction activities would include: 1) grading, 2) building, 3) pav-
ing, and 4) architectural coating. It is estimated that the Project has the potential to
import approximately 13,831 cubic yards of material during grading or approximately
864 truckloads.
The Project includes a number of discretionary actions as follows:
Lot Line Adjustment to align the lot lines with the proposed onsite driveways.
Change of Zone from Commercial Neighborhood to Commercial General to
allow for the proposed service station and car wash.
Site Plan and Design Review for retail building on Parcel 1.
Conditional Use Permit CUP to permit a service station with an automated car
wash and a convenience market with off-sale alcohol sales under a Type 21
Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) license.
Minor Use Permit to allow for the provision of parking that exceeds City require-
ments by more than five percent.
Minor Use Permits to allow for two fast food restaurants with the drive-through
lanes.
A Variance to allow 24 pumps where a maximum 15 are permitted by the De-
velopment Code.
Lot Line Adjustment
Currently, the project site consists of four parcels. The proposed Lot Line Adjustment
maintain four parcels but will align the lot lines with the proposed onsite driveways
(Figure 4). Along with a reciprocal access, parking and maintenance agreement, this
will facilitate the orderly provision of access within the commercial development. The
driveways/lot lines will be realigned to provide safer access points on Donna Way
(move the driveway/lot line away from the bend on Donna Way) and Main Street (pro-
vide a 90-degree intersection). The Lot Line Adjustment will result in four legal parcels:
Parcel 1 (3.04 acres), Parcel 2 (3.03 acres), Parcel 8 (1.98 acres), and Parcel 9 (1.40
acres).
Change of Zone
The requested change of zone would rezone the four parcels from Commercial Neigh-
borhood to Commercial General. The current Commercial Neighborhood zone allows
for all proposed uses except for the service station and car wash. Rezoning the site
to Commercial General will allow the development of these uses. The Commercial
General zone provides for general commercial and daily shopping needs of a broad
market area. The Commercial General zone allows for a wide range of retail sales
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 4 City of San Jacinto
and business, professional, and personal services that are accessible to transit corri-
dors. This zone allows a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.40. The Commercial
General zone is consistent with the Community Commercial land use designation of
the General Plan.
Site Plan Design Review
The applicant is currently seeking to develop the first phase of the project and has
developed site plans for retail building on Parcel 1 (Figures 5 and 6). Development of
the building on Parcel 1 requires Site Plan Design Review (SPDR-17-17). Site Plan
Design Review for development on the remaining parcels (Parcels 2, 8 and 9) will
occur when specific development plans are prepared, and the applicant seeks building
permits. While the current Site Plan Design Review is focused on Parcel 1, information
is provided below for Parcels 2, 8 and 9 as a basis for the environmental review of the
entire project.
Under the current Site Plan Design Review case, the City will ensure that the Project
respects the physical environmental characteristics of the property, provides safe and
convenient access and circulation for pedestrians and vehicles, provides high quality
design practices, minimizes or eliminates negative or undesirable visual impacts, pro-
vides for adequate dedication of land for public purposes and provides needed public
infrastructure.
Conditional Use Permit
A Conditional Use Permit is required to permit a service station with an automated car
wash and a convenience market with off-sale alcohol sales under a Type 21 Alcoholic
Beverage Control (ABC) license. The store will operate 24-hours a day, seven days
a week. (hours subject to change).
Minor Use Permit – Excess parking over five percent
A Minor Use Permit is needed to allow for the provision of parking that exceeds City
requirements by more than five percent. Total proposed parking on the site is 272
spaces, where as the City Development Code requires 249.
Minor Use Permits – Fast Food Restaurants with a Drive-Through
Two MUPs are for the two fast food restaurants with the drive-through lanes on Par-
cels 2 and 9. As designed the site meets all requirements for the use.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 5 City of San Jacinto
Project Summary
Parcel 1 is proposed for a multi-tenant retail building totaling 14,583 square feet of
specialty retail, with up to 10 individual tenant spaces ranging from 1,200 to 2,261
square feet each.
Parcel 2 is proposed for a 9,360-square-foot multi-tenant retail building and a 2,800-
square-foot-restaurant with drive-through service.
Parcel 8 is proposed for a service station with convenience store (approximately 3,048
square feet) and car wash (approximately 1,105 square feet).
Parcel 9 is proposed for 3,200-square-foot-restaurant with drive-through service.
The Project Standards are as follows:
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE CG ZONE
Required/
Permitted Parcel 1 Parcel 2 Parcel 8 Parcel 9
Parcel Area
(Net) Minimum
5,000 sq. ft.
(12,000 sq. ft. for
a Drive-Through)
132,637 sq. ft. 132,018 sq. ft. 86,281 sq. ft. 61,122 sq. ft.
Parcel Width
50 ft.
(100 sq. ft. for a
Drive-Through &
Service Station)
330 ft. 575 ft. 240 ft. 250 ft.
Parcel Depth 100 ft. 330 ft. 250 ft. 255 ft. 250 ft.
FAR (Maxi-
mum) .40 .11 .09 .05 .05
Building Size Varies 14,583 sq. ft. 12,160 sq. ft. 4,153 sq. ft. 3,200 sq. ft.
Building Height 45 ft. 32.5 ft. Specific plans have not been submitted. Building height
will not exceed 45 ft.
Impervious Sur-
face (Max) 85% 80% 69% 69% 83%
Structure/Lot
Coverage (Max) 50% 12% 10% 13% 6%
Setbacks
Street Setback
Ramona Ex-
pressway
12-foot parkway
8-foot walk
25-foot scenic
25 ft.
Scenic n/a n/a 25 ft. 34 ft.
Main Street
6-foot parkway
6-foot walk
12-foot land-
scape
12 ft.
Landscape 15 ft. n/a 15 ft. n/a
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 6 City of San Jacinto
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE CG ZONE
Required/
Permitted Parcel 1 Parcel 2 Parcel 8 Parcel 9
Side Building Interior Setback
Abutting Non-
Residential 0 ft. 21 ft. 16 ft. 23 ft. 36 ft.
Abutting Resi-
dential 10 ft. n/a n/a n/a n/a
Side Building
Street Setback 10 ft. 62 ft. 72 ft. 34 ft. 28 ft.
Rear Building Setback
Abutting Non-
Residential 0 ft. n/a n/a 65 ft. 99 ft.
Abutting Resi-
dential 15 ft. 15-20 ft. 15-20 ft. n/a n/a
Access
Site access would be provided by one right-in/out-only driveway on East Main Street,
one right-in/out-only driveway on Ramona Expressway, and one full access driveway
on Donna Way. A north-south aligned access driveway would be developed during
the first phase that would connect East Main Street to Donna Way. An east-west
aligned access lane would also be constructed during the first phase along the bound-
ary of Parcels 1 and 2. The access driveway connecting to Ramona Expressway
would be constructed at a later phase when Parcels 8 and/or 9 are developed.
Street Improvements
The Project would make improvements to Ramona Expressway and East Main Street
consistent with the General Plan and Landscape Design Guidelines. Ramona Ex-
pressway will be widened to the planned roadway width along the property frontage.
Improvements include southbound right-turn lanes at the project driveway and Donna
Way, and re-striping and signage to provide an additional southbound through lane.
An 8-foot wide Class 1 bike lane multi-use path will be provided within the landscaped
setback along the property frontage of Ramona Expressway in compliance with the
City’s Landscape Design Guidelines. A traffic signal will be installed at the intersection
of Ramona Expressway and Donna Way. Other improvements at this intersection in-
clude removing a portion of the Ramona Expressway median to allow full access to
Donna Way and to provide a northbound left-turn lane. The Project will modify existing
street signage and striping on the property frontage of East Main Street. Other road-
way work would include curb cuts for the driveways, and connections to underground
utility lines in the roadways.
Parking
A total of 269 parking stalls are envisioned for the entire four parcels. This would in-
clude an estimated 13 disabled parking stalls. The first phase of development on
Parcel 1 would provide 95 stalls, including 4 disabled stalls, 8 clean air vanpool/EV
stalls, 5 future EV stalls, and 5 bus stalls. A total of 6 short-term and 5 long-term
bicycle parking spaces would be provided around the perimeter of the retail building.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 7 City of San Jacinto
PARKING ANALYSIS
Ratio
(Gross Floor Area) Calculation Required Provided
Parcel 1
Retail – 1:250 of GFA & 1:300 for Outdoor Display
Areas 12,396/250 50
95
Restaurant – 1:200 for first 2,000 sq. ft. then 1:60 for
anything over 2,000 sq. ft. and 1/50 for patio areas
over 15% of GFA and 1/50 for patio areas over 15%
of GFA
2,000/200 +
187/60 +
900/50
13
Total Parcel 1 81
Parcel 2
Retail – 1:250 of GFA & 1:300 for Outdoor Display
Areas 7,956/250 32
101
Restaurant – 1:200 for first 2,000 sq. ft. then 1:60 for
anything over 2,000 sq. ft. and 1/50 for patio areas
over 15% of GFA
1,404/200 +
900/50 25
Fast Food w/Drive-Through – 1:200 for first 2,000 sq.
ft. then 1:60 for anything over 2,000 sq. ft. and 1/50
for patio areas over 15% of GFA
2,000/200 +
800/60 +
1,000/50
43
Total Parcel 2 100
Parcel 8
Convenience Store – 1:225 – plus 1 space for each
employee on duty during heaviest traffic 8-hour shift
3,048/225 +
4 employees 18
18
Total Parcel 8 18
Parcel 9
Fast Food Drive-Through – 1:200 for first 2,000 sq. ft.
then 1:60 for anything over 2,000 sq. ft.
2000/200 +
1,200/60 +
1,000/50
50
55
Total Parcel 9 50
The above spaces need to include the following:
ADA Stalls
1 – 25 = 1
26 – 50 = 2
51 – 75 = 3
76 – 100 = 4
Parcel 1 = 4
Parcel 2 = 4
Parcel 8 = 1
Parcel 9 = 2
Parcel 1 = 4
Parcel 2 = 5
Parcel 8 = 2
Parcel 9 = 2
Bicycle Parking – 10% of required parking spaces –
17.330.110 10%
Parcel 1 = 8
Parcel 2 = 10
Parcel 8 = 2
Parcel 9 = 5
Parcel 1 = 11
Parcel 2 = 11
Parcel 8 = 2
Parcel 9 = 6
Cal Green 5.106.4.1.1 – Short term bicycle parking
– 5% of new visitor parking spaces being added 5%
Parcel 1 = 4
Parcel 2 = 5
Parcel 8 = 1
Parcel 9 = 3
Parcel 1 = 6
Parcel 2 = 6
Parcel 8 = 2
Parcel 9 = 4
Cal Green 5.106.4.1.2 – Long Term bicycle park-
ing – when 10 or more occupants
5% of employee
parking spaces
Parcel 1 = 5
Parcel 2 = 5
Parcel 8 = 0
Parcel 9 = 2
Parcel 1 = 5
Parcel 2 = 5
Parcel 8 = 0
Parcel 9 = 2
Low-Emitting, Fuel Efficient and Carpool/Vanpool
Vehicles – Cal Green 5.106.5.2 – when 10 or more
stalls added
0 – 9 = 0
10 – 25 = 1
26 – 50 = 3
51 – 75 = 6
76 – 100 = 8
Parcel 1 = 8
Parcel 2 = 8
Parcel 8 = 1
Parcel 9 = 3
Parcel 1 = 8
Parcel 2 = 11
Parcel 8 = 1
Parcel 9 = 6
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 8 City of San Jacinto
PARKING ANALYSIS
Ratio
(Gross Floor Area) Calculation Required Provided
Electric Vehicle Charging Stations – Cal Green
5.106.5.3
0 – 9 = 0
10 – 25 = 1
26 – 50 = 2
51 – 75 = 4
76 – 100 = 5
Parcel 1 = 5
Parcel 2 = 5
Parcel 8 = 1
Parcel 9 = 2
Parcel 1 = 5
Parcel 2 = 7
Parcel 8 = 1
Parcel 9 = 4
Electric Vehicle Charging Stations – 17.430.361 3 – 50 = 1
51 – 100 = 2
Parcel 1 = 2
Parcel 2 = 2
Parcel 8 = 1
Parcel 9 = 1
Parcel 1 = 5
Parcel 2 = 7
Parcel 8 = 1
Parcel 9 = 4
10’ by 25’ Loading Space 10,000 to 20,000
sq. ft.=1
Parcel 1 = 1
Parcel 2 = 1
Parcel 8 = 0
Parcel 9 = 0
Parcel 1 = 1
Parcel 2 = 1
Parcel 8 = 0
Parcel 9 = 0
Landscaping & Drainage
Approximately 2.2 acres of landscaping is proposed along the Project boundaries and
throughout the parking lots. The landscaped areas will include pedestrian paths to
connect East Main Street to Donna Way and Ramona Expressway. A decorative wood
trellis will be provided at the main intersection of these paths. A preliminary Water
Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been prepared for the entire site. The site is
divided into four drainage management areas (DMAs) which roughly correspond to
the four parcels. Infiltration chambers will be installed below the parking areas on each
parcel to allow for percolation of stormwater on site. Runoff from the car wash pro-
posed on Parcel 8 will drain to the sanitary sewer.
Other Amenities
Five, approximately 240-square-foot, trash enclosures are proposed. The enclosures
would be constructed of concrete blocks with stone and stucco finish. The enclosure
would have metal roofing and gates. Two trash enclosures would be located along the
southern property boundary and the remaining three would be located in the interior
of the project site.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 9 City of San Jacinto
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Figures 1 - 3):
Land Use General Plan Zoning
North Vacant (north of East
Main Street)
CC – Community Commer-
cial and LDR – Low Density
Residential
CG – General Commercial
and RL – Residential,
Low Density
South
Soboba Indian Health Clinic,
EMWD property, and vacant
parcels
CC – Community
Commercial
CN – Commercial
Neighborhood
East
EMWD facilities and Valley
Trap Club trap shooting
range (east of Ramona
Expressway)
CC – Community
Commercial
CN – Commercial
Neighborhood
West The Durango residential
development
LDR – Low Density
Residential
RL – Residential,
Low Density
10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required (e.g., permits, financing ap-
proval, or participation agreement):
a. California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) License
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health
d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
e. Southern California Edison
f. South Coast Air Quality Management District
g. Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority
h. California Department of Fish and Wildlife
i. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
j. Regional Water Quality Control Board
11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with
the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code
section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for ex-
ample, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources,
procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.? Note: Conducting consultation early in the CEQA process
allows tribal governments, lead agencies, and project proponents to discuss the level of environmental review, identify and ad-
dress potential adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources, and reduce the potential for delay and conflict in the environmental
review process. (See Public Resources Code section 21080.3.2.) Information may also be available from the California Native
American Heritage Commission’s Sacred Lands File per Public Resources Code section 5097.96 and the California Historical
Resources Information System administered by the California Office of Historic Preservation. Please also note that Public Re-
sources Code section 21082.3(c) contains provisions specific to confidentiality.
Consultation under AB 52 commenced on January 18, 2019. The 30-day response
period ended on February 19, 2018. Information on the consultation process can be
found in Appendix A of this Initial Study.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 10 City of San Jacinto
12. Public Comment Period: August 16, 2019 to September 16, 2019
13. Other Environmental Reviews Incorporated by Reference in this Review:
a. General Plan as amended through October 19, 2012
b. General Plan EIR April 2006
c. General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, GPA-1-12
d. Riverside County DEIR No. 521
14. Technical Studies Referenced in this Initial Study:
a. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Report, prepared by EDS and OB-1 Air Analysis,
July 2019.
b. General Biological Assessment, prepared by ENVIRA, April 23, 2019.
c. San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat and Los Angeles pocket mouse Presence/Absence
Trapping and Burrowing Owl Re-Surveys, prepared by ENVIRA, June 25, 2019.
d. Cultural and Paleontological Resources Inventory, prepared by Natural Investiga-
tions Company, October 19, 2017.
e. Report of Soils and Foundation Evaluations, prepared by Soils Southwest, Novem-
ber 8, 2017
f. Hydrology Study, prepared by Tuttle Engineering, March 6, 2018.
g. Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan, prepared by CWE, July 2, 2019.
h. Noise Assessment, prepared by Ldn Consulting, Inc., July 15, 2019.
i. Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by Michael Baker International, June 25, 2019
j. Signing and Striping Plan, prepared by Michael Baker International, May 2019
k. Sewer Study, prepared by Dexter Wilson Engineering, February 6, 2019
15. Acronyms:
ABC - Alcohol Beverage Control
ALUC - Airport Land Use Commission
ALUCP - Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
AMSL - Above Mean Sea Level
AQMP - Air Quality Management Plan
CalEEMod - California Emissions Estimator Model
CBC - California Building Code
CDFW - California Department of Fish and Wildlife
CDWR - California Department of Water Resources
CERCLIS - Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, &
Liability Information System
CEQA - California Environmental Quality Act
CESA - California Endangered Species Act
CIWMD - California Integrated Waste Management District
CMP - Congestion Management Plan
CNPS - California Native Plant Society
CO - Carbon Monoxide
DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report
DTSC - Department of Toxic Substance Control
EIR - Environmental Impact Report
EMWD - Eastern Municipal Water District
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 11 City of San Jacinto
EOP - Emergency Operations Plan
FEMA - Federal Emergency Management Agency
FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report
FESA - Federal Endangered Species Act
GIS - Geographic Information System
GHG - Green House Gas
GP - General Plan as Amended October 19, 2012, San Jacinto
HCOC - Hydraulic Conditions of Concern
HUSD - Hemet Unified School District
IBC - International Building Code
IS - Initial Study
LHMP - Local Hazard Mitigation Plan
LHMWD - Lake Hemet Municipal Water District
LID - Low Impact Design
LST - Localized Significance Threshold
MBTA - Migratory Bird Treaty Act
MSHCP - Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
MWD - Metropolitan Water District
NAHC - Native American Heritage Commission
NCCP - Natural Communities Conservation Plan
NO2 - Nitrogen Dioxide
NOX - Nitrogen Oxides
NPDES - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
OEM - Office of Emergency Services
OPR - Office of Planning & Research, State
PEIR - Program Environmental Impact Report
PM-2.5 - Particulate Matter at 2.5 Micrometers
PM-10 - Particulate Matter at 10 Micrometers
PW - Public Works, Hemet
RCA - Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority
RCEH - Riverside County Environmental Health
RCFCWCD - Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District
RCIP - Riverside County Integrated Plan
RCP - Regional Comprehensive Plan
RCTC - Riverside County Transportation Commission
RTA - Riverside Transit Agency
RTIP - Regional Transportation Improvement Plan
RTP - Regional Transportation Plan
RWQCB - Regional Water Quality Control Board
SCAG - Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD - South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCE - Southern California Edison
SCH - State Clearinghouse
SJMC - San Jacinto Municipal Code
SJUSD - San Jacinto Unified School District
SKRHCP - Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan
SO2 - Sulphur Dioxide
SOX - Sulphur Oxides
SWPPP - Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
TDA - Treatment and Disposition Agreement
TRI - Toxic Release Inventory
UBC - Uniform Building Code
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 12 City of San Jacinto
USACOE - United States Army Corps of Engineers
USFWS - United States Fish and Wildlife Service
USGS - United States Geologic Survey
VOC - Volatile Organic Compounds
VWRPD - Valley Wide Recreation & Parks District
WQMP - Water Quality Management Plan
WRCOG - Western Riverside Council of Governments
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Figure 1
Aerial Photo
Feet0400200
E Main St
Ramo
n
a
E
xp
y
Donna WayE 7th StW Ramona
ExpyLake Par
k
Dri
v
e
Aerial date: February 2018
Project
Site
Soboba Indian
Health Center
Donna
W
a
y
Luiseño Village Retail Center
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Figure 2
General Plan Map
°0 250 500 Feet
East Main Street
E 7th Street
Figure 2 - General Plan
D o n n a W a y
Donna WayRa
mona
Ex
pr
e
s
s
wa
y
Project Site
LDR
PI
MDR
Water Source
CC
Luiseño Village Retail Center
Feet0500250
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Figure 3
Zoning Map
°0 250 500 Feet
East Main Street
E 7th Street
Figure 2 - General Plan
D o n n a W a y
Donna WayRa
mona
Ex
pr
e
s
s
wa
y
Project Site
LDR
PI
MDR
Water Source
CG
CN
Luiseño Village Retail Center
Feet0500250
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Figure 4
Lot Line Adjustment
Luiseño Village Retail Center
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Figure 5
Site Plan
SERVICE STATION
/ CONVENIENCE
STORECAR WASH
DRIVE-THRU
RESTAURANT
DRIVE-THRU
RESTAURANT
RETAIL
BUILDING
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 9
PARCEL 8
Luiseño Village Retail Center
RETAIL
BUILDING
E a s t M a in St r e e t
Ramona
E
xp
re
s
swa
y
Donna
Way
0 100 200 FeetDonna Way4.1.j
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-4.1.c
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Luiseño Village Retail Center
Figure 6
Parcel 1 Retail Building Eleva�ons
K J I H G F E D C B A
2 112
A B C D E F G H I J K
EAST ELEVATION A1/8"=1'-0"
WEST ELEVATION D1/8"=1'-0"
SOUTH ELEVATION B1/8"=1'-0"
NORTH ELEVATION C1/8"=1'-0"
0'-0"
T.O. FINISH FLOOR
0'-0"
T.O. FINISH FLOOR
0'-0"
T.O. FINISH FLOOR
0'-0"
T.O. FINISH FLOORT.O. STOREFRONT @ 9'-6"TYP.B.O. SOFFIT @ 13'-0"T.O. LOWR PARAPET @ 23'-6"T.O. PARAPET @ 27'-6"T.O. PARAPET @ 28'-6"T.O. RIDGE @ 32'-6"T.O. PARAPET @ 23'-6"B.O. SOFFIT @ 13'-0"B.O. SOFFIT @ 14'-0"B.O. SOFFIT @ 14'-0"T.O. PARAPET @ 23'-6"T.O. WINDOW @ 9'-5"T.O. PARAPET @ 15'-0"T.O. PARAPET @ 21'-6"T.O. PARAPET @ 27'-6"T.O. RIDGE @ 32'-6"T.O. PARAPET @ 21'-6"T.O. TRIM @ 4'-6"T.O. LOWER TRIM @ 3'-2"T.O. TRIM @ 17'-0"B.O. SOFFIT @ 10'-5"T.O. POP OUT REVEAL @ 8'-3"T.O. LOWER PARAPET @ 15'-0"T.O. PARAPET @ 21'-6"T.O. TRIM @ 3'-2"T.O. TRIM @ 3'-2"T.O. PARAPET @ 21'-6"B.O. WINDOW TRIM @ 3'-6"T.O. POP OUT TRIM @ 4'-6"CA E F BDCDE
A
A3.0
FF
A3.0 A3.0 A3.0 A3.0 A3.0 A3.0 A3.0 A3.0 A3.0
A3.0A3.0
T.O. PARAPET @ 23'-6"B.O. TRELLIS @ 9'-0"B.O. SOFFIT @ 12'-0"B.O. SOFFIT @ 14'-0"NOTE:
BUILDING PARAPETS SHALL SCREEN ALL ROOF TOP
MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT.
H
AD1.0
EXTERIOR MATERIALS
EXTERIOR CEMENT PLASTER WITH SMOOTH FINISH
EPS CORNICE / TRIM WITH SMOOTH PLASTER FINISH
METAL AWNING
MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER
DECORATIVE WOOD BRACKETS
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
HOLLOW METAL DOOR AND FRAME, PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT
SURFACE
STOREFRONT SYSTEM WITH ALUMINUM FRAME AND CLEAR GLAZING
13
-
EXTERIOR COLORS
-
A
-
B
-
C
-
D
-
E
-
F
-
G
-
H
ELDORADO STONE: MOUNTAIN LEDGE "SHASTA"
-
J
-
K
-
L
-
M
INTEGRAL COLOR PLASTER, WITH ELASTOMERIC PAINT TO MATCHSHERWIN-WILLIAMS, DOWNING SLATE #SW2819
INTEGRAL COLOR PLASTER, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN-WILLIAMS,MINUTE MAUVE #SW7078
INTEGRAL COLOR PLASTER, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN-WILLIAMS,RENWICK ROSE BEIGE #SW2804
INTEGRAL COLOR PLASTER, WITH ELASTOMERIC PAINT TO MATCHSHERWIN-WILLIAMS, ROOKWOOD SASH GREEN #SW2810
INTEGRAL COLOR PLASTER, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN-WILLIAMS,LEATHER BOUND #SW6118
PAINTED WOOD WATER TABLE
PRIMED FOR PAINT SELECT CEDARMILL HARDIE PLANK LAP SIDING WITH SMOOTH
FINISH BY JAMES HARDIE
DOUBLE EAGLE PONDEROSA FLAT TILE BY EAGLE ROOFING.
987 BROWN GRAY RANGE
11
H
STAINED WOOD
MEDIUM OAK COLOR
9
J
4
F
7
H
2
E
5
-
PAINTED STOREFRONT TRIM
12
E
8
E
2
E
3
D
5
-
8
E
4
F
1
B
1
B
1
A
1
B
1
C
1
B
5
-
8
E
4
F
2
E
1
A
7
H
9
J
11
H
5
-
12
E
1
B
8
E
4
F
1
C
2
E
1
B
5
-
4
F
3
D
1
A
8
E
4
F
1
B
2
E
8
E
4
F
10
G
1
B
9
J
11
H
1
B
2
E
2
E
8
E
5
-
12
E
4
F
1
B
2
E
11
H
9
J
7
H
8
E
10
G
11
H
9
J
7
H
2
E
1
B
8
E
8
E
5
-
12
E
4
F
1
B
2
E
2
E
4
F
4
F
6
B
1
B
2
E
2
E
BILL SPECK
10073 VALLEY VIEW ST.
CYPRESS, CA 90630
PHONE: 714-606-9141e-mail: allspeckslnc@yahoo.com
Copyright 2016, MPA Architects, Inc.. All rights reserved.cDESCRIPTION
REVISIONS
NO.DATE
PROJECT
CLIENT
A PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT:F. 619.236.0557
AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS
www.mpa-architects.com
MEMBER
San Diego, CA 92104V. 619.236.0595
3578 30th StreetM P A A R C H I T E C T S I N C .DATABASE:
SHEET NUMBER:
SCALE:
SHEET TITLE
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NO:17069
-
L. DALE
PLOT DATE:
DRAWN BY:
AS NOTED
-
17069
10-22-18 LUISENO VILLAGES.E.C. HWY 79 AND MAIN ST.SAN JACINTO, CA 92583LICENS E D ARCHIT
E
C
TST
ATEO OF CA L IF RNIANHOJ R UMS
E
YC26819Exp. 3-31-2019
A2.0
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
L
AD1.0
-
AD1.0
1
B
1
C
2
E
1
A
1
B
INTEGRAL COLOR PLASTER, COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN-WILLIAMS,INTELLECTUAL GRAY #SW7045
1
A
1
A
1
A
1
C
1
B
6
B
6
B
6
B
6
B
6
B
7
H
8
E
8
E
8
E
1/4" STUCCO REVEAL
13
-
13
-
14
-EXPOSED WOOD TRELLIS
14
H
15
-72"x96" MC NICHOLS PANEL
15
D
15
D
15
D
8
E
4
F
2
E
13
-
13
-
2
E
1
B
1
B
4
F
8
E
2
E
15
D
15
D
TRASH ENCLOSURE ELVATIONS E1/4"=1'-0"
8
E
4
F
PRECAST CONC. CAP,COLOR TO MATCHWALL BELOW
8x8x16 PRECISION CONCRETEBLOCKS w/ FLUSH JOINTS, w/SKIM COAT STUCCO FINISH,PAINT TO MATCH COLOR -
B
4x6 @ 24" O/Cw/ H2.5 EA. SIDE, TYP.
4x14 BEAM
-
H
-
H
METAL GATE -
H
METAL RIB ROOFU-PANEL 22 GA. w/ #6SCREWS @ 8" O/C
3'-2"6'-0"9'-0"3'-2"6'-0"9'-0"SLOPE ENCLOSURE COVER1/2-INCH PER FOOT MIN.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-4.1.c
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 19 City of San Jacinto
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the
checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics Agriculture &
Forestry Resources Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology & Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards &
Hazardous Materials
Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use & Planning Mineral Resources
Noise Population/Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities/Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of
Significance
DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency):
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environ-
ment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environ-
ment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project
have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant" or "potentially signifi-
cant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been ad-
equately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2)
has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described
on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must
analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environ-
ment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an
earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b)
have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARA-
TION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed
project, nothing further is required.
Signature
Date
Travis Randel, Planning and Community Development Director City of San Jacinto
Printed Name For
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 20 City of San Jacinto
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are
adequately supported by the information sources a Lead Agency cites in the pa-
rentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported
if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply
to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone).
A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific
factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive re-
ceptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis).
2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as
well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and
construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur,
then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially signifi-
cant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Sig-
nificant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is sig-
nificant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the
determination is made, an EIR is required.
4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies
where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Po-
tentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency
must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the
effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Ear-
lier Analyses," may be cross-referenced).
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other
CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or neg-
ative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should
identify the following:
a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for re-
view.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above
checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such
effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analy-
sis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitiga-
tion Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were
incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which
they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to in-
formation sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances).
Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropri-
ate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 21 City of San Jacinto
7) Supporting Information Sources. A source list should be attached, and other
sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats;
however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist
that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question;
and
b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than
significance.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 22 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
I. AESTHETICS – Except as provided in Public Resources Code §21099 – Modernization of
Transportation Analysis for Transit-Oriented Infill Projects – Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum
August 2012, GPA-1-12, & General Plan EIR Figure 5.1-1 – Major Scenic Resources)
The project site is located at the eastern fringe of development within the City of San Jacinto. The
project site is an undeveloped lot on southwest corner of East Main Street and Ramona Express-
way. Plant cover of the site is ruderal (weedy) grassland composed of non-native weeds with some
native shrubs (California buckwheat, California brittlebush, and sweet bush occur as isolated plants.
The site is flat with a gentle slope down to the northwest. The grades of Ramona Expressway and
East Main Street are elevated (by approximately seven feet) respective to the project site at the
intersection of the two streets. Further from the intersection, the roads return to the same grade as
the project site.
The surrounding area is a mix of residential, commercial and undeveloped areas. To the north are
vacant commercial zoned parcels north of East Main Street. To the east, Eastern Municipal Water
District Facilities and the Valley Trap Club trap shooting range is located east of Ramona Express-
way. To the south, the Soboba Indian Health Clinic and vacant commercial zoned land are located
south of Donna Way. To the west, the project site is bordered by the Durango residential develop-
ment, which includes one- and two-story single-family homes. A six-foot high masonry block wall
surrounds the residential development.
The overall visual character of the area is defined by the sparse plain of the San Jacinto Valley that
provides distant views of the surrounding mountains. The most scenic views are of the San Jacinto
Mountains to the north and east. Since these are the closest mountains, they appear larger and
higher. These views are for the most part unobstructed by trees and buildings in the immediate
vicinity. The primary public viewpoints are from East Main Street and Ramona Expressway. Donna
Way also provides public viewpoints.
The Project would result in the development of the project site, introducing buildings and trees that
would decrease the visibility of the horizon and distant mountains. This change would be most no-
ticeable to homes along the eastern edge of the Durango residential development. The views from
these homes are currently obstructed by the 6-foot high masonry wall that surrounds the develop-
ment, by neighboring homes, and associated landscape trees and shrubs. Nevertheless, some
homes along the eastern edge have views of the mountains. The Project would introduce buildings
and trees that would further obscure views from homes. The landscaping plan includes a row of
trees (golden rain tree and holly oak) along the western boundary of the project site that would
border the residential area. These would screen views of the proposed commercial development
but would also reduce views of the horizon and mountains.
While the Project would reduce views from the homes along the eastern edge of the Durango resi-
dential development, this change is consistent with the development of the site provided in the
General Plan. The project site has a General Plan land use designation of Community Commer-
cial. The proposed rezone from Commercial Neighborhood to Commercial General would not sub-
stantially change the visual impacts from site development. The allowable building height would
change from 35 feet to 45 feet. However, all proposed uses are expected to have building heights
of less than 35 feet. The Phase I retail center currently under Site Plan Design Review has a max-
imum height of 32.5 feet; however, most of the building has heights ranging from 20 to 28 feet
above grade. The future (Phase II) retail center would also be located near the western boundary
and is expected to have a similar design. The future envisioned uses of a gas station/mini mart
and drive-through restaurants are also expected to have maximum heights under 35 feet. The
change in zoning from Commercial Neighborhood to Commercial General would increase the al-
lowed structure coverage from 40% to 50%, and the impervious surface coverage from 80% to
85%. The proposed site plan for the entire site has a structure coverage of less than 9% and an
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 23 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
impervious surface coverage of approximately 77%. Other development standards for the Com-
mercial General zone are the same or similar to the development standards for Commercial
Neighborhood.
When viewed from the public view corridors of East Main Street and Ramona Expressway, the
Project would have less of an effect on scenic vistas. From viewpoints on East Main Street directly
north of the project site, the Project would diminish views of distant mountains to the southeast;
however, the primary scenic vista is of the mountains to the north and east, which would be unob-
structed. From viewpoints on Ramona Expressway, the primary scenic vista of the mountains to
the north and east would not be obstructed. From Donna Way, views of the mountains would be
partially obstructed by the proposed developments.
While the development of the Project would reduce scenic views from some residences located
west of the project site, scenic views along the primary public view corridors of East Main Street
and Ramona Expressway would not be significantly obstructed. Site Plan Design Review will be
required of all proposed developments, which will ensure proposed buildings and landscaping meet
the City’s design requirements. Therefore, the Project would have a less-than-significant impact
directly, indirectly and cumulatively on scenic vistas.
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Resource Management Element – Figure RM-4 – Cultural
Resources, Arts & Culture Element – Figure AC-1, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, GPA-1-12,
General Plan EIR Figure 5.1-1 – Major Scenic Resources, City of San Jacinto Landscape Design Guidelines – Appendix One –
Parkway & Median Master Plan, & Municipal Code Chapter 12.20 – Street Trees and Shrubs)
No state scenic highways are located near the project site. The project site does not contain trees,
rock outcroppings or historic buildings. No impacts would occur directly, indirectly or cumulatively to
scenic resources within a state scenic highway.
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially de-
grade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are those
that are experienced from publicly acces-
sible vantage point). If the project is in
an urbanized area, would the project
conflict with applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic quality?)
Response: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, & General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012,
GPA-1-12)
The Project would change the visual character of the project site from undeveloped open space to
an urban commercial center. The visual character of the project site is defined by its flatness and
weedy vegetation. As such, the project site does not possess visual characteristics that contribute
significantly to the area. The visual character of the site and surroundings is defined by views of the
surrounding mountains. As described under question a) above, the Project would diminish some
views of distant mountains, but would not obstruct the primary scenic vistas of the mountains from
East Main Street and Ramona Expressway.
The project would be consistent with the proposed zoning of Commercial General, and would com-
ply with all design standards. No variances are being requested. Development of the site as pro-
posed, in compliance with the City’s design standards, would not result in the loss of distinct or
valuable visual characteristics of the site and surroundings. The Project would result in a less-than-
significant impact directly, indirectly and cumulatively on the visual character of the site and surround-
ings.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 24 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
d) Create a new source of substantial light
or glare which would adversely affect
day or nighttime views in the area?
Response: (General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012,
GPA-1-12, Development Code Section 17.300.080 – Outdoor Light & Glare, Riverside County Ordinance 655 – Regulating Light
Pollution & San Jacinto Valley Area Plan of the Riverside County General Plan)
The City of San Jacinto is in Zone B of the Mount Palomar Observatory, located in San Diego County.
Zone B is the area defined as a circular ring forty-five (45) miles in radius centered on Palomar Obser-
vatory. The Project site is 29.65 miles from Mount Palomar Observatory. As well, the City enjoys limited
night sky impacts due to its rural nature. To preserve the night sky, lighting must be designed to limit
leak spillage that may obstruct or hinder the view of the nighttime sky. To reduce impacts related to light
pollution, the City requires that all developments introducing new light sources, or modifications to exist-
ing light sources, to shield all such devices. An exterior lighting plan shall be submitted to Design Review
staff for review and approval. A photometric study and manufacturer’s cut sheets of all exterior lighting
on the building, in the landscaped areas and in the parking lot shall be submitted with the exterior lighting
plan. All on-site lighting shall provide a minimum intensity of one foot-candle and a maximum intensity
of ten foot-candles at ground level throughout the areas serving the public and used for parking, with a
ratio of average light to minimum light of four to one (4:1). The light sources shall be shielded to minimize
off-site glare, shall not direct light skyward and shall be directed away from adjacent properties and public
rights-of-ways. If lights are proposed to be mounted on buildings, down-lights shall be utilized. Light
poles shall not exceed twenty (20) feet in height, including the height of any concrete or other base
material.
In addition, the design of the buildings reduces the number of reflective surfaces used in the construction
to minimize new sources of glare. Exterior building materials will use earth tone light colors with a low-
reflectance. Any bare metallic surfaces found on infrastructure such as pipes and poles shall be painted
to minimize reflectance and glare. As designed the impacts to the nighttime sky and the potential for
glare will be less than significant, directly, indirectly and cumulatively.
II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES – In determining whether im-
pacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the Califor-
nia Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and
farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Depart-
ment of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the
Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest car-
bon measurement methodology provided in Forest protocols adopted by the California Air Re-
sources Board. – Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland),
as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of
the California Resources Agency, to non-agricul-
tural use? Or pursuant to the City of San
Jacinto’s General Plan (page RM-28), convert
Farmland of Local Importance as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Map-
ping and Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
Response: (General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Figure RM-5 – Agricultural Resources, RM-6 – Important Farmland,
RM-3 – Vegetation Communities, General Plan EIR, Figure 5.2-1 – Agricultural Resources, Figure 5.2-1 – Important Farmland,
General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, GPA-1-12, Development Code Section 17.305.040 – Agriculture (Right to Farm), &
2014 Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program map)
The project site is designated as Farmland of Local Importance by the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agency. This designation is applied to sites that would be classified
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 25 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
as Prime and Statewide but lack available irrigation water. The project site was historically used for ag-
riculture but has been fallow and vacant for over 20 years. The Project would not convert Prime Farm-
land, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance.
The project site is also identified as Farmland of Local Importance within the San Jacinto General Plan
(Figure RM-6 Important Farmland). The General Plan designates the site as Community Commercial
and the General Plan EIR addressed the conversion of farmland to urban development. In approving the
General Plan, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations to address the loss of farmland
associated with buildout of the General Plan. Because the loss of Farmland was adequately addressed
in the General Plan EIR, the loss of Farmland of Local Importance that will occur with development of
the Project is not treated as significant here. Accordingly, impacts to Farmland will be less than signifi-
cant, directly, indirectly and cumulatively.
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricul-
tural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
Response: (General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Figure RM-5 – Agricultural Resources, RM-6 – Important Farmland,
RM-3 – Vegetation Communities, General Plan EIR, Figure 5.2-1 – Agricultural Resources, Figure 5.2-1 – Important Farmland,
General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, GPA-1-12, Development Code Section 17.305.040 – Agriculture (Right to Farm), &
2014 Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program Map)
The project site is designated and zoned for commercial development. The surrounding areas are not
zoned for agriculture or enrolled in a Williamson Act contract. The closest active agricultural fields are
located 1/4 mile north of the project site. The closest parcel zoned for agriculture is located 1/3 mile
southeast of the project site. The closest lands enrolled in a Williamson Act contract are over 3 miles
away. No impacts would occur directly, indirectly and cumulatively to existing agricultural use or a Wil-
liamson Act contract.
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in
Public Resources Code section
12220(g)), timberland (as defined by
Public Resources Code section 4526), or
timberland zoned Timberland Production
(as defined by Government Code section
51104(g))?
Response: (Riverside County DEIR No. 521 – Section 04-05 – Agricultural and Forestry Resources)
In Southern California, including Riverside County and the City of San Jacinto, climate and topography
limit the types and locations of forest lands and their potential for commercial or industrial timber utiliza-
tion. Accordingly, there are no existing or currently proposed zoning of forest land, timberland or Tim-
berland Production Zones within the City of San Jacinto. In addition, figures released by the State of
California indicate that no “California forest land” ownership, either public or private, is mapped for Riv-
erside County including the City of San Jacinto. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with the existing
zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production and
the Project will have no impact, directly, indirectly or cumulatively to forest land.
d) Result in the loss of forest land or con-
version of forest land to non-forest use?
Response: (Source: Riverside County DEIR No. 521 – Section 04-05 – Agricultural and Forestry Resources)
There is no commercial forestry or timber production industry within the City of San Jacinto other than
Christmas tree farms or nursery stock production (that is, cultivated, rather than wild-harvested); there-
fore, the Project would not result in the loss of forest land or the conversion of forest land to non-forest
use and the Project will have no impact, directly, indirectly or cumulatively to the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use.
e) Involve other changes in the existing en-
vironment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 26 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or con-
version of forest land to non-forest use?
Response: (General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Figure RM-5 – Agricultural Resources, RM-6 – Important Farmland,
RM-3 – Vegetation Communities, General Plan EIR, Figure 5.2-1 – Agricultural Resources, Figure 5.2-1 – Important Farmland,
General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, GPA-1-12, Development Code Section 17.305.040 – Agriculture (Right to Farm), &
2014 Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program map, & Riverside County DEIR No. 521 – Section 04-05 – Agricultural and
Forestry Resources)
As noted above, the closest agricultural fields are 1/4 mile away. Development of the proposed commer-
cial center would not significantly impact agriculture in the area or result in the conversion of Farmland
to non-agricultural use. No forestry resources exist within the City of San Jacinto. Impacts to conversion
of Farmland and forest land would be less than significant, directly, indirectly and cumulatively.
As noted above, there is no commercial forestry or timber production industry within the City of San
Jacinto other than Christmas tree farms or nursery stock production (that is, cultivated, rather than wild-
harvested); therefore, the Project would not result in the loss of forest land or the conversion of forest
land to non-forest use and the Project will have no impact, directly, indirectly or cumulatively.
III. AIR QUALITY – Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air
quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following
determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation
of the applicable air quality plan?
Response: (Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District’s 2012 Air Quality Management Plan & Air Quality and
Greenhouse Gas Report, prepared by EDS, Inc. and OB-1 Air Analyses, November 2018)
The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that "New or amended General Plan Elements (including land
use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for
consistency with the AQMP." Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not required. A
proposed project is considered consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does
not obstruct other policies. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency:
(1) Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality vio-
lations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or
the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP.
(2) Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP in 2012 or increments based on the
year of project buildout and phase. Both criteria are evaluated in the following sections.
Criterion 1 - Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations
Based on the air quality modeling analysis performed for the Project as part of the Air Quality and
Greenhouse Gas Report neither short-term construction impacts, nor long-term operations will not re-
sult in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD regional and local thresholds of significance. There-
fore, the Project is not projected to contribute to the exceedance of any air pollutant concentration
standards and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the first criterion.
Criterion 2 - Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP?
Consistency with the AQMP assumptions is determined by performing an analysis of the proposed Pro-
ject with the assumptions in the AQMP. The emphasis of this criterion is to ensure that the analyses
conducted for the Project are based on the same forecasts as the AQMP. The 2016- 2040 Regional
Transportation/Sustainable Communities Strategy, prepared by SCAG, 2016, includes chapters on the
challenges in a changing region, creating a plan for our future, and the road to greater mobility and
sustainable growth. These chapters currently respond directly to federal and state requirements placed
on SCAG. Local governments are required to use these as the basis of their plans for purposes of
consistency with applicable regional plans under CEQA. For this Project, the City of San Jacinto Land
Use Plan defines the assumptions that are represented in the AQMP.
The existing General Plan land use designation for the project site is Community Commercial. The
Project would be consistent with this General Plan land use designation. Therefore, the Project would
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 27 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
not exceed the AQMP assumptions for the project site and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for
the second criterion.
Based on the above, the Project will have no impact on the SCAQMD AQMP.
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non-attain-
ment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard?
Response: (Source: Municipal Code 10.28 – Vehicle Trip Reduction Program, Chapter 15.30 – Dust Control, Development
Code Section 17.300.030 Air Quality, Chapter 17.350 – Transportation Demand Management, South Coast Air Quality Manage-
ment District’s 2012 Air Quality Management Plan & Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Report, prepared by EDS, Inc. and OB-1 Air
Analyses, November 2018)
The Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Report prepared for the Project found the following related to
Construction Emissions Impacts:
Regional Construction Emissions
The construction emissions for the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD’s daily emission thresholds
at the regional level as demonstrated in the table below, and therefore would be considered less than
significant.
Regional Significance – Construction Emission (pounds/day)
Pollutant
Maximum Day
Emissions
(lbs/day)
Significance
Thresholds
(lbs/day)
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 58.3 100
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) 20.0 75
Particulate Matter < 10 microns (PM10) 10.9 150
Particulate Matter < 2.5 microns (PM2.5) 6.9 55
Sulfur Oxides (SOx) 0.1 150
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 26.3 550
Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Report.
Localized Construction Emissions
In addition to addressing emissions on a regional basis, SCAQMD has developed methodology to ad-
dress the potential for project emissions to result in elevated concentrations of pollutants that exceed
ambient air quality standards. The SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold (LST) Methodology
(SCAQMD, 2008a) uses tables of emission thresholds based on the project’s location and site acreage
to determine the significance of emissions for CEQA purposes. The data provided in the table below
shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the local emissions thresholds. There-
fore, a less-than-significant local air quality impact would occur from the construction of the Project.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 28 City of San Jacinto
Localized Significance -- Construction
Phase
Pollutant Emissions
(lbs/day)
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Site Preparation 48.2 22.5 10.7 6.8
Grading 30.7 16.6 4.5 2.9
Building Construction 23.4 17.6 1.5 1.4
Paving 15.2 14.7 0.8 0.8
Architectural Coating 1.8 1.8 0.1 0.1
SCAQMD LST Threshold 371 1,965 13 8
Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Report.
Construction-Related Toxic Air Contaminant Impact
Construction activities would result in short-term emissions of diesel particulate matter (diesel PM) from
off-road heavy-duty diesel equipment exhaust and diesel-fueled haul trucks. Diesel PM was identified
as a toxic air contaminant (TAC) by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) in 1998. Health risks
associated with exposure of sensitive receptors to TAC emissions are typically based on the concen-
tration of a substance or substances in the environment (dose) and the duration of exposure to the
substance(s). Dose is positively correlated with time, meaning that a longer exposure period would
result in a higher exposure level for the maximally exposed individual. Thus, the risks estimated for a
maximally exposed individual are higher if a fixed exposure occurs over a long period of time. According
to the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, health risk assessments, which
determine the exposure of sensitive receptors to TAC emissions, should be based on a 70-year expo-
sure period. Project construction, however, would occur over a much shorter period of time. The site
preparation and grading phases, which would generate most of the diesel PM on the site, would be
limited to about six weeks. Use of off-road heavy-duty diesel equipment would be temporary, and diesel
PM emissions would disperse rapidly with distance from the source. Thus, construction-related TAC
emissions would not expose sensitive off-site receptors to substantial concentrations of TACs. The
Project would result in a less-than-significant impact for short-term toxic air containments during
construction of the Project.
Regional Operational Emissions
The operations-related criteria air quality impacts created by the Project have been analyzed through
the use of CalEEMod model. The operating emissions were based on the year 2020, which is the
anticipated opening year for the first phase of the Project. The summer and winter emissions created
by the Project’s long-term operations were calculated and the highest emissions from either summer
or winter are summarized in the table below.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 29 City of San Jacinto
Regional Significance – Operational Emissions (lbs/day)
Pollutant
Maximum Day
Emissions
(lbs/day)
Significance
Thresholds
(lbs/day)
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 48.8 55
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) 13.7 55
Particulate Matter < 10 microns (PM10) 14.4 150
Particulate Matter < 2.5 microns (PM2.5) 4.0 55
Sulfur Oxides (SOx) 0.22 150
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 87.7 550
Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Report.
Localized Operational Emissions
The table below shows the calculated emissions for the proposed operational activities compared with
appropriate LSTs. The LST analysis only includes on-site sources; however, the CalEEMod software
outputs do not separate on-site and off-site emissions for mobile sources. For a worst-case scenario as-
sessment, the emissions shown in the table below include all on-site Project-related stationary sources
and 10% of the Project-related new mobile sources. This percentage is an estimate of the amount of pro-
ject-related new vehicle traffic that will occur on-site. Therefore, the Project will have a less-than-signif-
icant impact on Localized Operational emissions.
Localized Significance – Operation Emissions
Emission Sources
Pollutant Emissions
(pounds/day)
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Area 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00
Energy 0.46 0.38 0.03 0.03
Mobile 4.83 8.73 1.43 0.40
Total On-site Emissions 5.29 9.11 1.46 0.43
SCAQMD LST Threshold 371 1,965 4 2
Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Report.
CO Hot Spot Emissions
SCAQMD recommends that a local CO hot spot analysis be conducted if an intersection meets one of
the following criteria: 1) the intersection is at level of service (LOS) D or worse and where the project
increases the volume to capacity ratio by 2 percent, or 2) the project decreases an intersection from C
to D.
One intersection, Ramona Expressway and East Main Street/Lake Park Drive, would operate at LOS
D with or without the Project. Based on traffic volumes estimated in the traffic study (Michael Baker
International, 2019), with the project Ramona Expressway would have an average traffic volume of
approximately 22,240 vehicles per day and East Main Street has approximately 6,540 vehicles per day.
The 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide (1992 CO Plan) showed that an intersection
which has a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day would not violate the CO
standard. The volume of traffic at this intersection would be well below 100,000 vehicles and below the
necessary volume to cause a violation of the CO standard. Therefore, no CO “hot spot” modeling was
performed, and project impacts on CO concentrations are considered to be less than significant.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 30 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Operational Toxic Air Contaminant Impact
Operation of the proposed service station would release TACs including benzene, ethylbenzene, tolu-
ene, xylenes, and naphthalene from gasoline vapors. These vapors are emitted during the transfer of
gasoline from tanker trucks to underground storage tanks, venting of underground storage tanks, and
refueling vehicles (including spillage). The service station would be required to have an enhanced vapor
recovery system that is effective at removing 98 percent of Phase I emissions and 95 percent of Phase
II emissions. A health risk assessment (HRA) was completed for the proposed service station using
SCAQMD’s Rule 1401 Calculator that was developed to assist in determining the cancer and non-
cancer health effects of facilities emitting TACs. The calculation indicates a Maximum Individual Cancer
Risk (MICR) of 1.373 for a residential receptor and 1.152 for a commercial receptor, these values are
below the SCAQMD’s significance threshold of 10 in a million. The calculation also indicates that
chronic and acute hazard risks are negligible. Because TAC emissions associated with operation of the
proposed service station would not exceed significance thresholds and screening criteria, the Project
would result in a less-than-significant impact.
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
Response: (Source: Municipal Code 10.28 – Vehicle Trip Reduction Program, Chapter 15.30 – Dust Control, Development
Code Section 17.300.030 Air Quality, Chapter 17.350 – Transportation Demand Management, South Coast Air Quality Manage-
ment District’s 2012 Air Quality Management Plan & Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Report, prepared by EDS, Inc. and OB-1 Air
Analyses, November 2018)
As noted in Response III a) and b) above, the construction-related and operational emissions of the
Project would not exceed significance thresholds. Therefore, the Project will have a less-than-signifi-
cant impact on sensitive receptors.
d) Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?
Response: (Source: Municipal Code 10.28 – Vehicle Trip Reduction Program, Chapter 15.30 – Dust Control, Development
Code Section 17.300.030 Air Quality, Chapter 17.350 – Transportation Demand Management, South Coast Air Quality Manage-
ment District’s 2012 Air Quality Management Plan & Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Report, prepared by EDS, Inc. and OB-1 Air
Analyses, November 2018)
Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include the application of materials
such as paint and asphalt pavement. The objectionable odors that may be produced during the construc-
tion process would be short-term in nature and the odor emissions are expected cease upon the drying
or hardening of the odor producing materials. In addition, SCAQMD Rule 1113 limits the amount of vol-
atile organic compounds from architectural coatings. Due to the short-term nature and limited amounts
of odor producing materials being utilized, no significant impact related to odors would occur during con-
struction.
Operation of the Project would include two drive-through restaurants and other retail establishments.
Odors generated on the site would be primarily associated with exhaust fumes from cooking food, with
charbroilers being the most significant source. SCAQMD Rule 1138 requires restaurants with chain-
driven charbroilers to install odor-reducing equipment. Garbage collection would also have the potential
to generate foul odors. Good housekeeping practices would be sufficient to prevent nuisance odors. In
addition, SCAQMD Rule 402 (Nuisance) would limit potential objectionable odor impacts. With compli-
ance with SCAQMD rules, construction and operation of the Project would result in a less-than-signifi-
cant impact.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 31 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ̶ Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications,
on any species identified as a candi-
date, sensitive, or special status species
in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Depart-
ment of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Resource Management Element – Figure RM-1 – Open
Space Resources, RM-3 – Vegetation Communities, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, General Plan
EIR Figure 5.4-1 – Vegetation Communities, Figure 5.4-2 – San Jacinto Valley Area Plan with Vegetation, Cells and Cell Groups
Keyed to MSHCP Criteria, Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Development Code Chapter
17.520 – Natural Resource Conservation, General Biological Assessment, prepared by ENVIRA, April 23, 2019 & San Bernardino
Kangaroo Rat and Los Angeles pocket mouse Presence/Absence Trapping and Burrowing Owl Re-Surveys, prepared by ENVIRA,
June 25, 2019)
A General Biological Assessment was prepared for the Project by ENVIRA (April 2019). The General
Biological Assessment includes habitat assessments and focused surveys for resources covered under
the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) survey require-
ments, including the burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Dipodomys mer-
riami parvus), and Los Angeles pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris brevinasus). The project site
was re-surveyed for burrowing owl, San Bernardino kangaroo rate, and Los Angeles pocket mouse in
June 2019 (ENVIRA, July 2019).
Plant Communities
The project site was historically used for agriculture but has been fallow and vacant for over 20 years. It
has been mowed and possibly disked occasionally for weed control. Currently, the plant community found
on site is a ruderal (weedy) grassland composed of a mix of non-native weeds such as Mediterranean
grass (Schismus barbatus), short-pod mustard (Hirschfeldia incana), red-stemmed filaree (Erodium cicu-
tarium). Native shrub species such as California buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), California brittle-
bush (Encelia farinosa) and sweet bush (Bebbia juncea) occur as isolated plants. Herbaceous cover is
estimated at 85 percent, and shrub cover at less than 1 percent. The MSHCP does not identify the project
area as having habitat for Criteria Area or Narrow Endemic Plant species.
Wildlife
Only a few day-time wildlife species were observed during field surveys, mostly due to the lack of plant
cover, water and native food resources. Bird species observed included common species such as mourn-
ing dove (Zenaida macroura), house sparrow (Passer domesticus), California towhee (Pipilo crissalis),
and lark sparrow (Chondestes grammacus). The side-blotched lizard (Uta stansburiana) was the only
reptile observed. No amphibian species were observed. Mammal species observed included Audubon’s
cottontail (Syvilagus audubonii), and Botta’s pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae).
The habitat assessment identified potential habitat for sensitive biological resources, in particular the
San Bernardino kangaroo rat, Los Angeles pocket mouse, and burrowing owl as identified in the MSHCP.
San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat
The habitat assessment conducted by ENVIRA in 2017 identified potential kangaroo rat burrows. To
determine whether SBKR were present on the project site, protocol trapping survey were conducted by
ENVIRA in September 2017 and June 2019. The trapping surveys were conducted according to USFWS
protocols established for SBKR, which require five nights of live-trapping. The SBKR was not captured,
and the species is therefore considered absent from the project site.
Los Angeles Pocket Mouse
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 32 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The habitat assessment conducted by ENVIRA in 2017 identified potential pocket mouse burrows. How-
ever, during the subsequent protocol trapping surveys in 2017 and 2019, the LAPM was not captured.
The species is therefore considered absent from the project site.
Burrowing Owl
The entire project site is within the MSHCP designated survey area for the burrowing owl. Habitat for
burrowing owl was assessed over the entire project site by ENVIRA biologist Philippe Vergne in 2017.
Surveys conducted in accordance with MSHCP’s Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions were conducted in
2017 and 2019. The surveys included looking for burrowing owl burrows, whitewash, pellets, animal
remains and other burrowing owl indicators.
No potential burrows and no sign of burrowing owls were observed on the project site. However, bur-
rowing owls were observed north of East Main Street in 2017 indicating that the project site could be
used for foraging by burrowing owl or could get colonized in the future. Because the site has the potential
to support burrowing owls in the future, the MSHCP requires that pre-construction surveys be conducted
prior to disturbance of the site. Therefore, MM BIO 1 is recommended for compliance with the MSHCP
burrowing owl requirements.
The Project will have a less-than-significant impact with mitigation on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
MM BIO 1 – Burrowing Owl
If construction occurs during the breeding season (February 1 to August 31), a burrowing owl
breeding bird survey following the recommended guidelines of the MSHCP will be required within
30 days prior to construction to determine if nesting is occurring on site.
If burrowing owl have colonized the project site, the Applicant will prepare a Burrowing Owl
Protection and Relocation Plan for approval by RCA and CDFW.
Occupied nests will not be disturbed during the nesting season (February 1 through August 31)
unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds
have not begun egg-laying and incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are for-
aging independently and are capable of independent survival.
If the biologist is not able to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur
during the breeding season within a distance determined by the qualified biologist for each
nest or nesting site. For the burrowing owl, the recommended distance is a minimum of 160
feet.
Relocation of burrowing owl is subject to the above conditions and prior coordination with RCA,
CDFW and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS).
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations or by the Cali-
fornia Department of Fish and Wildlife or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Resource Management Element – Figure RM-1 – Open
Space Resources, RM-3 – Vegetation Communities, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, General Plan
EIR Figure 5.4-1 – Vegetation Communities, Figure 5.4-2 – San Jacinto Valley Area Plan with Vegetation, Cells and Cell Groups
Keyed to MSHCP Criteria, Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Development Code Chapter
17.520 – Natural Resource Conservation, General Biological Assessment, prepared by ENVIRA, April 23, 2019 & San Bernardino
Kangaroo Rat and Los Angeles pocket mouse Presence/Absence Trapping and Burrowing Owl Re-Surveys, prepared by ENVIRA,
June 25, 2019)
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 33 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Riparian/Riverine Areas
Riparian/Riverine Areas are defined by the MSHCP as “lands which contain Habitat dominated by tress
[sic], shrubs, persistent emergents, or emergent mosses and lichens, which occur close to or which
depend upon soil moisture from a nearby fresh water source; or areas with fresh water flow during all or
a portion of the year”.
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), through provisions of the State of California
Administrative Code, is empowered to issue agreements for any alteration of a river, stream or lake
where fish or wildlife resources may adversely be affected. Streams (and rivers) are defined by the
presence of a channel bed and banks, and at least an intermittent flow of water. Lateral limits of
jurisdiction are not clearly defined, but generally include any riparian resources associated with a stream
or lake, CDFW regulates wetland areas only to the extent that those wetlands are part of a river, stream
or lake as defined by CDFW.
Water may have historically flowed across the project site, but the natural flow was altered years ago by
the channeling of the San Jacinto River, the development of agriculture and the construction of adjacent
roadways and development. The site is almost flat and has sandy soils. There are no riparian habitats,
drainages, culverts, streams, or other waters that would come under the jurisdiction of the CDFW.
Therefore, the Project will have no impact to riparian or riverine areas.
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on
state or federally protected wetlands (in-
cluding, but not limited to, marsh, vernal
pool, coastal, etc.) through direct re-
moval, filling, hydrological interruption, or
other means?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Resource Management Element – Figure RM-1 – Open
Space Resources, RM-3 – Vegetation Communities, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, General Plan
EIR Figure 5.4-1 – Vegetation Communities, Figure 5.4-2 – San Jacinto Valley Area Plan with Vegetation, Cells and Cell Groups
Keyed to MSHCP Criteria, Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Development Code Chapter
17.520 – Natural Resource Conservation, General Biological Assessment, prepared by ENVIRA, April 23, 2019 & San Bernardino
Kangaroo Rat and Los Angeles pocket mouse Presence/Absence Trapping and Burrowing Owl Re-Surveys, prepared by ENVIRA,
June 25, 2019)
Vernal Pool
Vernal pools are defined by the MSHCP as “seasonal wetlands that occur in depression areas that have
wetlands indicators of all three parameters (soils, vegetation and hydrology) during the wetter portion of
the growing season but normally lack wetlands indicators of hydrology and/or vegetation during the
drier portion of the growing season . . .. Evidence concerning the persistence of an area's wetness can
be obtained from its history, vegetation, soils, and drainage characteristics, uses to which it has been
subjected, and weather and hydrologic records” (Riverside County Transportation and Land
Management Agency).
Prior to 1990s, the site appears to have been in active agricultural use. Since then, it appears to have
been occasionally disked for weed control.
The soils mapped on the site are all described by the National Resource Conservation Service as loamy
sands or sandy loams. The soils are described as somewhat poorly drained to excessively well-drained.
Flooding in all the soils is rare, and ponding never occurs (NRCS, 2019).
Based on the survey results, soils type and history of the site, vernal pools are not present.
Army Corps of Engineers
The Corps regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States. These
watersheds include wetlands and non-wetland bodies of water that meet specific criteria. The lateral limit
of Corps jurisdiction extends to the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) and to any wetland areas
extending beyond the OHWM; thus, the maximum jurisdictional area is represented by the OHWM or
wetland limit, whichever is greater.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 34 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Corps regulatory jurisdiction pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act is founded on a connection
or nexus between the water body in question and interstate (waterway) commerce. This connection may
be direct, through a tributary system linking a stream channel with traditional navigable waters used in
interstate or foreign commerce, or may be indirect, through a nexus identified in the Corps regulations.
Water may have historically flowed across the Project site, but the natural flow was altered years ago by
the channeling of the San Jacinto River, and the development of the surrounding area. There are no
waters or wetland habitats that would be subject to Corps jurisdiction pursuant Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act.
Regional Water Quality Control Board
The Corps has delegated the authority for use of 404 permits to each individual state. The use of a 404
permit in California is regulated by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) under Section
401 of the Clean Water Act regulations. The Board has authority to issue a 401 permit that allows the
use of a 404 permit in the state, with the authority in the state being vested in regional offices known as
Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB).
Under the Porter-Cologne Act of 2003, the SWRCB has extended its responsibilities to include impacts
to water quality from non-point source pollution. In addition, the SWRCB has the responsibility to require
that projects address ground water and water quality issues, which would be evaluated as part of the
geotechnical and hydrology studies. Their authority extends to all waters of the State (of California).
Water may have flowed across the project site in the past, but historic natural flow in the region was
altered years ago, by channelization, the development of agriculture and development of the surrounding
area. There are no waters or wetland habitats that would come under the jurisdiction
of the Santa Ana RWQCB or provide any Beneficial Uses (BUs) that might come under the RWQCB
protection.
Therefore, the Project will have no impact on protected wetlands.
d) Interfere substantially with the movement
of any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Resource Management Element – Figure RM-1 – Open
Space Resources, RM-3 – Vegetation Communities, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, General Plan
EIR Figure 5.4-1 – Vegetation Communities, Figure 5.4-2 – San Jacinto Valley Area Plan with Vegetation, Cells and Cell Groups
Keyed to MSHCP Criteria, Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Development Code Chapter
17.520 – Natural Resource Conservation, General Biological Assessment, prepared by ENVIRA, April 23, 2019 & San Bernardino
Kangaroo Rat and Los Angeles pocket mouse Presence/Absence Trapping and Burrowing Owl Re-Surveys, prepared by ENVIRA,
June 25, 2019)
Habitat Fragmentation and Wildlife Movement
Wildlife movement and the fragmentation of wildlife habitat are recognized as critical issues that must be
considered in assessing impacts to wildlife. In summary, habitat fragmentation is the division or breaking
up of larger habitat areas into smaller areas that may or may not be capable of independently sustaining
wildlife and plant populations. Wildlife movement (more properly recognized as species movement) is
the temporal movement of species along diverse types of corridors. Wildlife corridors are especially im-
portant for connecting fragmented wildlife habitat areas.
The surrounding area includes residential and commercial development and some vacant lots. None of
the adjacent lands provide habitat that supports significant wildlife populations. The closest area of im-
portant habitat is the San Jacinto River floodplain. This habitat is separated from the project site by
Ramona Expressway, the river levee, and Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) property used for
percolation that is maintained free of vegetation. Habitat on the project site is ruderal grassland and is
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 35 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
isolated from the surrounding area. As such, the project site does not provide for wildlife movement in
the area.
Raptors, Migratory Birds, and Habitat
Most of the raptor species (eagles, hawks, falcons and owls) are experiencing population declines be-
cause of habitat loss. Some, such as the peregrine falcon, have also experienced population losses as
a result of environmental toxins affecting reproductive success, animals destroyed as pests or collected
for falconry, and other direct impacts on individuals. Only a few species, such as the red-tailed hawk and
barn owl, have expanded their range despite or a result of human modifications to the environment. As
a group, raptors are of concern to state and federal agencies.
Raptors and all migratory bird species, whether listed or not, also receive protection under the Migratory
Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918. The MBTA prohibits individuals to kill, take, possess or sell any
migratory bird, bird parts (including nests and eggs) except per regulations prescribed by the Secretary
of the Interior Department (16 U. S. Code 703).
Additional protection is provided to all bald and golden eagles under the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act of 1940, as amended. State protection is extended to all birds of prey by the CDFW Code,
Section 2503.5. No take is allowed under these provisions except through the approval of the agencies
or their designated representatives.
Because the project site has no trees, there is no nesting habitat for raptors or migratory birds on site
other than for ground nesting species (burrowing owl, Killdeer, Larks). While unlikely, the project site may
provide habitat for ground-nesting migratory birds. Therefore, MM BIO 2 is recommended for to avoid
impacts to nesting birds.
MM BIO 2 – Nesting Birds
A breeding bird survey will be required to determine if nesting is occurring no more than five days
prior to ground disturbing activities. Occupied nests will not be disturbed during the nesting sea-
son (February 1 through August 31) unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive
methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg-laying and incubation; or (b) the juve-
niles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent sur-
vival.
If the biologist is not able to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur
during the breeding season within a distance determined by the qualified biologist for each nest
or nesting site.
The Project will have a less-than-significant impact with mitigation on habitat fragmentation and nest-
ing birds.
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordi-
nances protecting biological resources,
such as a tree preservation policy or or-
dinance?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Resource Management Element – Figure RM-1 – Open
Space Resources, RM-3 – Vegetation Communities, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, General Plan
EIR Figure 5.4-1 – Vegetation Communities, Figure 5.4-2 – San Jacinto Valley Area Plan with Vegetation, Cells and Cell Groups
Keyed to MSHCP Criteria, Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Development Code Chapter
17.520 – Natural Resource Conservation, General Biological Assessment, prepared by ENVIRA, April 23, 2019 & San Bernardino
Kangaroo Rat and Los Angeles pocket mouse Presence/Absence Trapping and Burrowing Owl Re-Surveys, prepared by ENVIRA,
June 25, 2019)
Habitat on the project site is limited to ruderal grasslands. The site does not contain any trees or other
significant biological resources protected by policies or ordinances. Therefore, no impact, directly, indi-
rectly and cumulatively, will occur.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 36 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Com-
munity Conservation Plan, or other ap-
proved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Resource Management Element – Figure RM-1 – Open
Space Resources, RM-3 – Vegetation Communities, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, General Plan
EIR Figure 5.4-1 – Vegetation Communities, Figure 5.4-2 – San Jacinto Valley Area Plan with Vegetation, Cells and Cell Groups
Keyed to MSHCP Criteria, Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Development Code Chapter
17.520 – Natural Resource Conservation, Noise Assessment, prepared by Ldn Consulting, Inc., July 15, 2019, General Biological
Assessment, prepared by ENVIRA, April 23, 2019, San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat and Los Angeles pocket mouse Presence/Ab-
sence Trapping and Burrowing Owl Re-Surveys, prepared by ENVIRA, June 25, 2019 & Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Report,
prepared by EDS, Inc. and OB-1 Air Analyses, July 2019)
The subject property is located within the Criteria Area of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species
Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) San Jacinto Valley Area Plan. As such, the Project must comply
with the requirements of the MSHCP. The applicant is required to pay the MSHCP Development Mitiga-
tion Fee and the Project must be consistent with MSHCP Reserve Assembly criteria and “Other Plan
Requirements.”
Reserve Assembly
The approximately 9.5-acre project site is within the MSHCP Criteria Area of Subunit 3, Upper San
Jacinto River/Bautista Creek for the San Jacinto Valley Area Plan. Specifically, approximately 8.7 acres
of the project site is within Criteria Cell 3098 and approximately 0.8 acre of the project site is located
within Criteria Cell 3099. The MSHCP identifies that conservation of grassland habitat within Criteria
Cells 3098 and 3099 is intended to contribute to the assembly of Proposed Core 5, which is comprised
of the portion of the upper San Jacinto River extending from the San Jacinto Mountains to just west of
State Street.
The MSHCP identifies that conservation within Criteria Cell 3098 will range from 5% to 15% of the Cell
focusing in the southeastern portion of the Cell. The acreage that needs to be conserved in this cell will
therefore range from 8 to 24 acres. The project site is located within the southeast portion of Criteria Cell
3098 which is the area described for Conservation. Criteria Cell 3099 is part of Cell Group Z; there are
four Cells in this Cell Group and Cell 3099 is the southernmost Cell in the Cell Group. Conservation
within Cell Group Z will be approximately 5% (approximately 32 acres) of the Cell Group focusing in the
southwestern portion of the Cell Group. The project site is located within the southwestern portion of Cell
Group Z which is the area described for Conservation.
Because the Project would develop the entire project site, the Criteria of the MSHCP must be modified
via a Criteria Refinement. To meet the Reserve Assembly goals of the MSHCP, the applicant has iden-
tified an 11.6-acre Replacement Site. The Replacement Site proposed to be conserved as part of the
Criteria Refinement is located northwest of the Soboba Springs Country Club, south of Soboba Road,
and adjacent to existing conserved lands (Figure 7). The APNs associated with the Replacement Site
include a portion of APN 433-080-005, 433-080-011, and 433-080-012.
Approximately 11.2 acres of the Replacement Site is located within Criteria Cell 2787, approximately
0.16 acre of the Replacement Site is located within Criteria Cell 2893, approximately 0.001 acre of the
Replacement Site is located within Criteria Cell 2895, and approximately 0.249 acre of the Replacement
Site is located outside of a Criteria Cell. The Replacement Site is located within portions of these Criteria
Cells that were not identified for conservation within the MSHCP. Therefore, conservation of the Re-
placement Site would contribute lands not already called out for conservation, which means the MSHCP
would get additional lands within Criteria Cells 2787, 2893 and 2895.
The proposed Criteria Refinement will result in approximately 11.6 acres of higher quality habitat being
added to the MSHCP Conservation Area that were not originally intended to be Conserved. Approxi-
mately 8.7 acres of the 11.6-acre Replacement Site would compensate for the development of Criteria
Cell 3098 by the Project (1:1 replacement ratio), while the remaining approximately 2.9 acres is identified
to compensate for the removal of 0.8 acre in Criteria Cell 3099 (3.6:1 replacement ratio). The total acre-
age being conserved is greater than the total area being removed for development (approximately 11.6
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Figure 7
Replacement Site Loca�on Map
0 1,250 2,500625 Feet
Luiseño Village Retail Center
Project Site
Replacement
Site
Ramona Exp
re
s
sway
Lake Park DriveSoboba Ro
a
dEast Main Street
3098
3099 3100
2996
2893 2895
2787
Project Site
Replacement Site
MSHCP Conservation
Public/Quasi-Public
Conserved Lands
Other Conservation
3099 Criteria Cells
0 1,250 2,500 Feet
San
J
ac
i
nt
o Ri
ver
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 38 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
acres to be conserved versus approximately 9.5 acres proposed for development). This translates into
an overall conservation ratio of roughly 1.2:1.
The Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) determined, and the CDFW and
USFWS have agreed, that the proposed Criteria Refinement would result in equivalent or superior bio-
logical value and that the Criteria Refinement is consistent with the MSHCP (Beck, 2019).
Other Plan Requirements
Riparian/Riverine, Vernal Pool, and Fairy Shrimp Requirements:
The only habitat found on the project site is ruderal grasslands. No riparian/riverine, vernal pools or other
wetland habitat exists on the site. No habitat exists on the site that can support fairy shrimp. Accordingly,
MSHCP requirements to protect these habitats and the fairy shrimp do not apply to the site.
Species Survey Requirements:
The project site is located within the Burrowing Owl Survey Area, and the eastern margin of the site is
within the SBKR and LAPM Survey Area. The MSHCP does not identify the project area as having habitat
for Criteria Area or Narrow Endemic Plant Species or being in a mapped area for Amphibians. Habitat
assessments for burrowing owl, SBKR and LAPM were conducted as part of a General Biological As-
sessment completed by ENVIRA in 2017. The project site was re-surveyed in 2019. These surveys were
conducted in accordance with MSHCP’s Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions. The surveys included look-
ing for burrowing owl burrows, whitewash, pellets, animal remains and other burrowing owl indicators.
No sign of burrowing owls was observed on site. However, burrowing owls were observed across Ra-
mona Expressway in 2017 indicating that the project site could be used for foraging by burrowing owl or
could get colonized in the future. Implementation of MM BIO 1 would ensure project consistency with
MSHCP survey requirements and that impacts to burrowing owl are reduced to a less-than-significant
level.
The habitat assessment identified potential kangaroo rat and pocket mouse burrows. To determine
whether SBKR and LAPM were present on the project site, a protocol trapping survey was conducted by
ENVIRA in September 2017. Trapping surveys were conducted again in June 2019. SBKR and LAPM
were not captured, and these species are therefore considered absent from the project site. The Project
has met the Species Survey Requirements for SBKR and LAPM.
Information on Other Species
The project site is not within an area with Delhi soils mapped within the MSHCP baseline data. A list of
species identified during the habitat assessment and trapping studies was compiled (ENVIRA, April
2019). None of the MSHCP Table 9-3 species occur on the project site.
Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines:
MSHCP includes guidelines intended to reduce the indirect effects of development on areas described
for conservation. The guidelines address site drainage, use of chemicals and toxics, lighting, noise, in-
vasive species, access barriers and grading. The project site is separated from the nearest conservation
area (San Jacinto River) by Ramona Expressway, the river levee, and EMWD percolation pond. As such,
development of the project site would not directly or indirectly impact the MSHCP conserved lands along
the San Jacinto River. In addition, design features incorporated into the Project would further reduce the
potential for indirect effects.
The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the Project incorporates infiltration cham-
bers that will be installed below the parking areas to allow for percolation of stormwater on site. Storm-
water will be filtered through the underground chambers, removing contaminants and reducing discharge
to a level equal to or below the pre-development discharge. Stormwater that is not infiltrated on site
would discharge to an existing concrete swale on the west side of the Project site that drains to East
Main Street and the City of San Jacinto’s storm sewer system and not to the nearby San Jacinto River
and Conserved lands. Runoff from the proposed car wash will drain to the sanitary sewer.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 39 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The proposed land uses on the project site would include typical retail businesses. No significant
amounts of toxics will be generated or used on the project site. Based on the analysis presented in the
Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Report, emissions of potential toxic air contaminants would be below
applicable significance criteria (EDS/OB-1, 2019).
All exterior lighting would be required to comply with the City of San Jacinto Municipal Code Section
17.300.080 – Outdoor Light and Glare. Section 17.300.080 requires that exterior lights “be located so as
to eliminate spillover illumination or glare onto adjoining properties and to prohibit any interference with
the normal operation or enjoyment of adjacent property.” The code also requires that exterior lights be
shielded or otherwise controlled and not directed upward into the sky. These code requirements, which
are enforced through the City’s Design Review process, will ensure that lighting on the project site will
not increase the ambient nighttime light levels in the nearby MSHCP Conservation Area.
The Project will increase noise levels in the vicinity of the project site due to the operation of vehicles,
exhaust and air conditioning fans, and the carwash air dryer and vacuums. Based on the analysis pre-
sented in the Noise Assessment, because these noise sources are at least 650 feet from the nearest
MSHCP conservation area, noise levels will attenuate to levels that fall below the nighttime residential
noise standard of 45 dBA (Ldn Consulting, 2019). Accordingly, traffic noise levels along Ramona Ex-
pressway and Lake Park Drive are expected to continue to be the dominate noise in the vicinity. Existing
noise levels along Ramona Expressway are estimated to be approximately 72 to 74 dBA (CNEL) and
existing noise levels along Lake Park Drive are estimated to be approximately 67 dBA (CNEL). Noise
levels along these roadways are expected to increase by 0.2 to 0.3 dBA (CNEL) with the Project – a level
that is well below the ability of humans to detect and is not expected to measurably increase noise levels
in the nearby MSHCP conserved lands (Ldn Consulting, 2019). The levee along the western side of the
San Jacinto River will also continue to function as a noise berm and reduce sound levels in the river bed
that are generated by Ramona Expressway. No additional noise reduction measures are required to
maintain existing noise levels in the nearby MSHCP Conserved Lands.
Consistent with City of San Jacinto Municipal Code Section 17.325.060 – Landscape and Irrigation Sub-
mittal Package Requirements, a landscape plan must be approved by the City before a grading permit
is issued. The City incorporates the list of invasive plant species provided in Table 6-2 of the MSHCP in
its review. Through the City’s review of the landscaping plans submitted for the project site, the City will
ensure that none of the plant species listed in Table 6-2 will be included in plans.
Because a public roadway (Ramona Expressway) is located between the project site and the nearest
conservation area, the incorporation of wildlife barriers would not be appropriate. Grading and develop-
ment of the project site will not change slope or drainage patterns in a manner that could affect the
MSHCP conservation area.
Best Management Practices
The Project will comply with MSHCP Volume 1, Appendix C, Standard BMPs. In addition, construction
of the roadway improvements are subject to the guidelines provided in MSHCP Section 7.5.3. The ap-
plicable conditions shall be applied to the Project so that impacts are reduced to species as construction
occurs. Compliance with these conditions is required by the City as a Permittee per the Implementing
Agreement Sections 6 (I) and 13.2 (A). The applicable BMPs included in MM BIO 3 and MM BIO 4 are
recommended to comply with the MSHCP.
MM BIO 3 – MSHCP BMPs
A condition shall be placed on grading permits requiring a qualified biologist to conduct a train-
ing session for project personnel prior to grading. The training shall include a description of
the species of concern and its habitats, the general provisions of the Endangered Species Act
(Act) and the MSHCP, the need to adhere to the provisions of the Act and the MSHCP, the
penalties associated with violating the provisions of the Act, the general measures that are
being implemented to conserve the species of concern as they relate to the project, and the
access routes to and project site boundaries within which the project activities must be accom-
plished.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 40 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Water pollution and erosion control plans shall be developed and implemented in accordance
with RWQCB requirements.
The footprint of disturbance shall be minimized to the maximum extent feasible. Access to
sites shall be via pre-existing access routes to the greatest extent possible.
Equipment storage, fueling, and staging areas shall be located on upland sites with minimal
risks of direct drainage into riparian areas or other sensitive habitats. These designated areas
shall be located in such a manner as to prevent any runoff from entering sensitive habitat.
Necessary precautions shall be taken to prevent the release of cement or other toxic sub-
stances into surface waters. Project related spills of hazardous materials shall be reported to
appropriate entities including but not limited to applicable jurisdictional city, FWS, and CDFG,
RWQCB and shall be cleaned up immediately and contaminated soils removed to approved
disposal areas.
The removal of native vegetation shall be avoided and minimized to the maximum extent prac-
ticable. Temporary impacts shall be returned to pre-existing contours and revegetated with
appropriate native species.
Exotic species that prey upon or displace target species of concern should be permanently
removed from the site to the extent feasible.
To avoid attracting predators of the species of concern, the project site shall be kept as clean
of debris as possible. All food related trash items shall be enclosed in sealed containers and
regularly removed from the site(s).
Construction employees shall strictly limit their activities, vehicles, equipment, and construction
materials to the proposed project footprint and designated staging areas and routes of travel.
The construction area(s) shall be the minimal area necessary to complete the project and shall
be specified in the construction plans. Construction limits will be fenced with orange snow
screen. Exclusion fencing should be maintained until the completion of all construction activi-
ties. Employees shall be instructed that their activities are restricted to the construction areas.
The Permittee shall have the right to access and inspect any sites of approved projects includ-
ing any restoration/enhancement area for compliance with project approval conditions includ-
ing these BMPs.
MM BIO 4 – Roadway Construction BMPs
The following measures apply to the construction of roadway improvements with the rights-of-way of
Ramona Expressway and East Main Street that are completed as part of the Project.
Plans for water pollution and erosion control will be prepared for work involving the movement
of earth in excess of 50 cubic yards. The plans will describe sediment and hazardous materials
control, dewatering or diversion structures, fueling and equipment management practices, use
of plant material for erosion control. Plans will be reviewed and approved by the City prior to
construction.
Timing of construction activities will consider seasonal requirements for breeding birds and
migratory non-resident species. Habitat clearing will be avoided during species active breeding
season defined as March 1 to June 30.
Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented until such time soils are deter-
mined to be successfully stabilized.
Silt fencing or other sediment trapping materials will be installed at the downstream end of
construction activities to minimize the transport of sediments off-site.
The footprint of disturbance will be minimized to the maximum extent Feasible. Access to sites
will occur on pre-existing access routes to the greatest extent possible.
Equipment storage, fueling and staging areas will be sited on non-sensitive upland wildlife
habitat types with minimal risk of direct discharge into riparian areas or other sensitive wildlife
habitat types.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 41 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Exotic species removed during construction will be properly handled to prevent sprouting or
regrowth.
Training of construction personnel will be provided.
Ongoing monitoring and reporting will occur for the duration of the construction activity to en-
sure implementation of best management practices.
Active construction areas shall be watered regularly to control dust and minimize impacts to
adjacent vegetation.
All equipment maintenance, staging, and dispensing of fuel, oil, coolant, or any other toxic
substances shall occur only in designated areas within the proposed grading limits of the pro-
ject site. These designated areas shall be clearly marked and located in such a manner as to
contain run-off.
Waste, dirt, rubble, or trash shall not be deposited in the Conservation Area or on native hab-
itat.
Summary
With implementation of MM BIO 1, MM BIO 2, MM BIO 3, and MM BIO 4 the Project would not conflict
with the MSHCP or any other habitat conservation plans. The Project would result in less-than-signifi-
cant impacts with mitigation on an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conserva-
tion Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan.
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES ̶ Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a historical resource
as defined in § 15064.5?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Resource Management Element Figure RM-4 – Cultural
Resources, General Plan FEIR, Figure 5.5-1 – Existing Cultural Resources, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, General
Plan EIR Figure 5.1-1 – Existing Cultural Resources, Development Code Chapter 17.500 – Archaeological and Paleontological
Protection & Chapter 17.510 – Historic Preservation, Cultural and Paleontological Resources Inventory, Prepared by Natural In-
vestigations Company, October 19, 2017)
The Cultural Resource Inventory prepared for this site found that the project site has been disturbed by
former use for agriculture, by grading and construction of the former route of Mountain Avenue and its
intersection with Main Street through the northeast portion of the project site and of the series of existing
surrounding roadways (Main Street, Ramona Expressway, Donna Way), and by disking for weed control
and fire prevention. No features, objects, buildings or other historical resources were identified on the
project site during the survey. Thus, the Project does not have the potential to cause an adverse change
in the significance of a historical resource under CEQA. Therefore, no impact would occur directly, indi-
rectly and cumulatively.
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of an archaeological re-
source pursuant to § 15064.5?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Resource Management Element Figure RM-4 – Cultural
Resources, General Plan FEIR, Figure 5.5-1 – Existing Cultural Resources, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, General
Plan EIR Figure 5.1-1 – Existing Cultural Resources, Development Code Chapter 17.500 – Archaeological and Paleontological
Protection & Chapter 17.510 – Historic Preservation, Report of Findings From a Record Search, prepared by Scientific Resource
Surveys, Inc., February 7, 2017 & Cultural and Paleontological Resources Inventory, Prepared by Natural Investigations Company,
October 19, 2017)
No archaeological resources were identified or recorded during the Cultural Resource Inventory, and
previous disturbance of the project site noted in the discussion under question a) reduces the likelihood
of intact archaeological resources. However, in the event that archaeological resources are encountered
during construction, implementation of MM CR 1 would ensure that archaeological resources are con-
served. The Project would result in less-than-significant impacts with mitigation, directly, indirectly
and cumulatively.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 42 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
MM CR 1 – Archaeological Resources
Should cultural/archaeological resources be encountered during ground disturbing activities for the
project, work must be halted in the area within 50 feet of the find and a qualified archaeologist notified
immediately to assess the significance of the find. Construction activities could continue in other
areas. If the discovery proves to be significant, additional work, such as data recovery excavation,
may be warranted and would be discussed in consultation with the property owner, the City of San
Jacinto, or any other relevant regulatory agency, as appropriate.
c) Disturb any human remains, including
those interred outside of formally dedi-
cated cemeteries?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Resource Management Element Figure RM-4 – Cultural
Resources, General Plan FEIR, Figure 5.5-1 – Existing Cultural Resources, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, General
Plan EIR Figure 5.1-1 – Existing Cultural Resources, Development Code Chapter 17.500 – Archaeological and Paleontological
Protection & Chapter 17.510 – Historic Preservation, Report of Findings From a Record Search, prepared by Scientific Resource
Surveys, Inc., February 7, 2017 & Cultural and Paleontological Resources Inventory, Prepared by Natural Investigations Company,
October 19, 2017)
No cemeteries or human remains are known to occur onsite and it is unlikely that human remains will be
uncovered during Project development. Implementation of mitigation measures will assure that impacts
will be less-than-significant impact with mitigation, directly, indirectly or cumulatively.
MM CR 2 – Human Remains
In the event of the discovery of human remains, the Riverside County coroner shall be immediately
notified. If human remains of Native American origin are discovered during ground disturbing activi-
ties, the applicant shall comply with the State law relating to the disposition of Native American burials
that fall within the jurisdiction of the NAHC (PRC Section 5097). According to California Health and
Safety Code, six or more human burials at one location constitute a cemetery (Section 8100), and
disturbance of Native American cemeteries is a felony (Section 7052). Section 7050.5 requires that
excavation be stopped near discovered human remains until the coroner can determine whether the
remains are those of a Native American. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the
California Native American Heritage Commission and the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians shall be
notified, and appropriate measures provided by State law shall be implemented to determine the
most likely living descendant(s). Disposition of the remains shall be overseen by the most likely living
descendants to determine the most appropriate means of treating the human remains and any as-
sociated grave artifacts.
VI. ENERGY – Would the project:
a) Result in potentially significant environmental im-
pact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012; General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012; City of San
Jacinto Municipal Code)
Construction of the proposed commercial center would require typical use of energy resources. Energy
would be consumed during site clearing, excavation, grading, and construction. A substantial portion of
energy used during construction would be associated with the transport of earth fill to grade the site. The
initial grading plan identified 44,462 cubic yards of fill imported onto the site. The grading plan has been
revised to reduce the amount of fill to 13,831 cubic yards; this would save truck trips and greatly reduce
energy required during construction.
Other aspects of the construction process would be typical. No site conditions or project features would
require an inefficient or unnecessary consumption of energy. The project has been designed in compli-
ance with California’s Energy Efficiency Standards and 2016 CALGreen Standards. These measures
include the use of water conserving plumbing, installation of bicycle racks, and designated parking for
Clean Air/Carpool/Van Pool Vehicles.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 43 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Operation of the proposed commercial center would involve the use of energy for heating, cooling and
equipment operation. These facilities would comply with all applicable California Energy Efficiency Stand-
ards and 2016 CALGreen Standards.
The largest source of operational energy use would be vehicle operation of customers. The site’s location
at the intersection of an urban arterial and secondary street, would reduce vehicle miles traveled by
capturing existing traffic on the surrounding roadways. The traffic study has identified pass-by trip reduc-
tions ranging from 25 percent for the commercial center to 50 percent for the service station/car wash.
In addition, due to the multiple land uses on the site (i.e., retail center, fast food restaurants, service
station) the internal capture of trips would reduce trips by an additional 5 percent. Taken together, the
location and incorporation of multiple land uses provide a 47 percent reduction of trips. The site is located
close to existing transit service, with Riverside Transit Agency Bus Route 42 providing direct access and
connections to other lines.
Neither construction or operation of the project would result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary con-
sumption of energy, or wasteful use of energy resources. Therefore, impacts related to wasteful energy
use would be less than significant.
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012; General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012; City of San
Jacinto Municipal Code)
The project has been designed in compliance with California’s Energy Efficiency Standards and 2016
CALGreen Standards. These include the use of water conserving plumbing, installation of bicycle racks,
and designated parking for Clean Air/Carpool/Van Pool Vehicles. The project would not conflict with or
obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency; therefore, impacts would be less
than significant.
VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS ̶ Would the project:
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss,
injury or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as deline-
ated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earth-
quake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Ge-
ologist for the area or based on other substantial
evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Public Safety Element, Figure PS-1 – Geologic & Seismic
Hazards, General Plan FEIR, Figure 5.6-1 – Seismic Hazards, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, SJMC Chapter 15.24 –
Earthquake Hazard Reduction Code, SJMC Chapter 16.28 – Soils Report & Report of Soils and Foundation Evaluations, prepared
by Soils Southwest, November 8, 2017)
Unlike damage from ground shaking, which can occur at great distances from the fault, impacts from
fault rupture are limited to the immediate area of the fault zone where the fault breaks along the surface.
The Project is not located in an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone and the closest known fault is
located approximately 0.9 miles from the site. Therefore, the potential hazards associated with fault rup-
ture are considered less than significant, directly, indirectly, and cumulatively.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Public Safety Element, Figure PS-1 – Geologic & Seismic
Hazards, General Plan FEIR, Figure 5.6-1 – Seismic Hazards, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, SJMC Chapter 15.24 –
Earthquake Hazard Reduction Code, SJMC Chapter 16.28 – Soils Report & Report of Soils and Foundation Evaluations, prepared
by Soils Southwest, November 8, 2017)
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 44 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The project site is subject to ground shaking due to the proximity of the Claremont Fault and other re-
gional fault systems. The California Building Code addresses seismic hazards and provides safeguards
against typical ground shaking. However, the Soil and Foundation Report prepared for the Project deter-
mined that the site may be susceptible to earthquake-induced liquefaction that could result in ground
settlement. The Soil and Foundation Report also found that implementation of identified mitigation
measures could minimize the potential for seismically induced adverse effects to structures. Implemen-
tation of mitigation measures will assure that impacts will be less than significant with mitigation,
directly, indirectly or cumulatively.
MM GEO 1 – Geotechnical Design
The Soil and Foundation Report (Soils Southwest, 2017) provides foundation recommendations to
minimize seismic-induced settlement hazards. These include using conventional checkered/waffle
type rigid footings for exterior load bearing walls along with interior grade beams, or using a rigid
mat foundation. Additional recommendations address concrete slab construction and curing, exca-
vation and fill, pavement and utility trenches. The recommendations identified in the Soil and Foun-
dation Report, or similar measures approved by a registered civil engineer, shall be incorporated
into the construction plans. Project plans will be reviewed during the plan check process to confirm
geotechnical design measures are incorporated to address the potential for seismic-induced settle-
ment. These measures shall be incorporated into final construction plans prior to issuance of build-
ing permits.
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including lique-
faction?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Public Safety Element, Figure PS-1 – Geologic & Seismic
Hazards, General Plan FEIR, Figure 5.6-1 – Seismic Hazards, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, SJMC Chapter 15.24 –
Earthquake Hazard Reduction Code, SJMC Chapter 16.28 – Soils Report & Report of Soils and Foundation Evaluations, prepared
by Soils Southwest, November 8, 2017)
Liquefaction is the process in which loose, saturated granular soil loses strength because of cyclic load-
ing. The strength loss is a result of a decrease in granular sand volume and a positive increase in pore
pressures. The Soil and Foundation Report prepared for the Project determined that the site may be
susceptible to earthquake-induced liquefaction that could result in ground settlement. The Soil and Foun-
dation Report also found that implementation of identified mitigation measures could minimize the po-
tential for seismically induced adverse effects to structures. Implementation of MM GEO 1 will ensure
that impacts will be less than significant with mitigation, directly, indirectly or cumulatively.
iv) Landslides?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Public Safety Element, Figure PS-1 – Geologic & Seismic
Hazards, General Plan FEIR, Figure 5.6-1 – Seismic Hazards, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, SJMC Chapter 15.24 –
Earthquake Hazard Reduction Code, SJMC Chapter 16.28 – Soils Report & Report of Soils and Foundation Evaluations, prepared
by Soils Southwest, November 8, 2017)
The site is located on relatively level ground and is not immediately adjacent to any slopes or hillsides
that could be potentially susceptible to landslides. As such, risks associated with slope instability should
be considered "negligible." Therefore, impacts related to landslides would be less than significant,
directly, indirectly and cumulatively.
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Public Safety Element, Figure PS-1 – Geologic & Seismic
Hazards, General Plan FEIR, Figure 5.6-1 – Seismic Hazards, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, SJMC Chapter 15.24
– Earthquake Hazard Reduction Code, SJMC Chapter 16.28 – Soils Report & Report of Soils and Foundation Evaluations, pre-
pared by Soils Southwest, November 8, 2017)
Erosion is a large-scale impact caused by human activity and disturbance of surface soil, wind, and
water. No signs of flooding or erosion were observed during field visits. During construction, grading of
the site would expose soil to wind and water erosion. The developer would be required to comply with
the General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit issued by the State Water Resources Control
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 45 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Board (SWRCB) under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). Construction ac-
tivity subject to this permit includes clearing, grading and disturbances to the ground such as stockpiling,
or excavation. To obtain coverage under this permit, the developer would need to submit a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP would identify potential pollution sources and best
management practices (BMPs) to reduce pollutants. Permanent BMPs would required as part of the
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) required for the Project as part of Riverside County Municipal
NPDES Storm Water Permit, which covers the stormwater drainage system of the City of San Jacinto.
These BMPs would ensure that soil erosion would be minimized after construction is completed. Com-
pliance with the General Permit and Municipal Permit requirements would reduce impacts related to
erosion to less than significant, directly, indirectly and cumulatively.
c) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table
18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code, creating
substantial risks to life or property?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Public Safety Element, Figure PS-1 – Geologic & Seismic
Hazards, General Plan FEIR, Figure 5.6-1 – Seismic Hazards, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, SJMC Chapter 15.24 –
Earthquake Hazard Reduction Code, SJMC Chapter 16.28 – Soils Report & Report of Soils and Foundation Evaluations, prepared
by Soils Southwest, November 8, 2017)
Expansive soils contain certain types of clay minerals that shrink or swell as the moisture content
changes; the shrinking or swelling can shift, crack, or break structures built on such soils. Arid or semiarid
areas with seasonal changes of soil moisture experience a much higher frequency of problems from
expansive soils than areas with higher rainfall and more constant soil moisture.
The Soil and Foundation Report determined that the near surface soils are silty sandy in nature and are
considered "very low" in expansion, requiring no special construction requirements. Potential impacts
associated with expansive soils are considered to be less than significant, directly, indirectly and cu-
mulatively.
d) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting
the use of septic tanks or alternative waste wa-
ter disposal systems where sewers are not
available for the disposal of waste water?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Public Safety Element, Figure PS-1 – Geologic & Seismic
Hazards, General Plan FEIR, Figure 5.6-1 – Seismic Hazards, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, SJMC Chapter 15.24 –
Earthquake Hazard Reduction Code, SJMC Chapter 16.28 – Soils Report & Report of Soils and Foundation Evaluations, prepared
by Soils Southwest, November 8, 2017)
The Project will be served by San Jacinto sewer infrastructure. An 8-inch clay pipe sewer line exists in
San Jacinto Avenue. The Project will be required to connect to the sewer line. Therefore, the Project
will have no impact, directly, indirectly or cumulatively on the disposal of wastewater and it will not be
using a septic tank.
Waste water from the project site would be directed to the City’s sewer system and treated at the Eastern
Municipal Water District’s treatment plant. No on-site waste water system is proposed. The Project would
have no impact directly, indirectly or cumulatively regarding the disposal of waste water.
e) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleonto-
logical resource or site or unique geologic fea-
ture?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Resource Management Element Figure RM-4 – Cultural
Resources, General Plan FEIR, Figure 5.5-1 – Existing Cultural Resources, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, General
Plan EIR Figure 5.1-1 – Existing Cultural Resources, Development Code Chapter 17.500 – Archaeological and Paleontological
Protection & Chapter 17.510 – Historic Preservation, Report of Findings From a Record Search, prepared by Scientific Resource
Surveys, Inc., February 7, 2017 & Cultural and Paleontological Resources Inventory, Prepared by Natural Investigations Company,
October 19, 2017)
The Paleontological Resource Survey prepared for this site found that no unique geologic features exist
on the project site. However, the project site is located in an area mapped by Riverside County as having
high sensitivity for paleontological resources. The older Pleistocene sediments underlying the project site
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 46 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
are considered to have a high paleontological sensitivity at depths at or below 4 feet, with a low sensitivity
in Holocene alluvial deposits at shallower depths. Excavation and grading on the site has the potential
to impact paleontological resources. Implementation of mitigation measures will assure that impacts will
be less than significant with mitigation, directly, indirectly or cumulatively.
MM GEO 2 – Paleontological Resources
All earthmoving during project implementation at or below 4 feet requires full-time paleontological
monitoring, as follows:
A qualified paleontologist (graduate degree and more than one year of professional experience
as a principal investigator) will be retained to provide paleontological services. The principal
paleontologist will be responsible to implement and oversee monitoring and to maintain profes-
sional standards of work. The principal paleontologist will report all mitigation and monitoring
activities, or related actions of the paleontological resources team to the City, as appropriate,
including discussing a reduction in monitoring from full- to part-time after monitoring is initiated
and no fossils have been identified.
A qualified paleontological monitor will perform monitoring of construction grading and excava-
tions that take place in the older Pleistocene sediments at depths of 4 feet or more. The moni-
tor will have authority to divert grading away from exposed fossils temporarily in order to re-
cover the fossil specimens. Cooperation and assistance from on-site personnel will greatly as-
sist timely resumption of work in the area of the fossil discovery.
Discovery of fossil producing localities requires documentation including measured strati-
graphic columns and geologic samples for analysis. Any fossils recovered that meet signifi-
cance criteria will be prepared, identified, and cataloged before donation to an appropriate re-
pository. The Western Science Center in Hemet, California is recommended as an appropriate
repository.
The principal paleontologist retained will prepare a final report. The report will include a list of
specimens recovered, documentation of each locality, interpretation of fossils recovered, and
will include any specialists’ reports as appendices.
VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ̶ Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either di-
rectly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment?
Response: (Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Report, prepared by EDS, Inc. and OB-1 Air Analyses, July 2019)
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions refer to a group of emissions that have the potential to trap heat in
the atmosphere and consequently affect global climate conditions. Scientific studies have concluded that
there is a direct link between increased emission of GHGs and long-term global temperature. The prin-
cipal GHGs are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6),
perfluorocarbons (PFCs), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), and water vapor (H2O). CO2 is the reference gas
for climate change because it is the predominant greenhouse gas emitted. To account for the varying
warming potential of different GHGs, GHG emissions are often quantified and reported as CO2 equiva-
lents (CO2e) and measured in metric tons per year (MT/year).
Construction of the Project would emit GHG emissions through the combustion of fossil fuels by heavy-
duty construction equipment and through vehicle trips generated by construction workers traveling to
and from the site. Emissions of GHGs were calculated using CalEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) for each year
of construction of the Project. As shown in the table below, total construction emissions over the entire
construction period would be 638 MT CO2e. Consistent with SCAQMD guidance, the construction emis-
sions are amortized over 30 years. Using this approach, the Project’s construction emissions would be
21 MT CO2e per year.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 47 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The proposed development would also result in operational GHG emissions. A variety of sources are
considered in estimating CO2e emissions. The largest source is ‘mobile’ which consists of vehicle trips
of business patrons and employees, followed by ‘energy’ which includes emissions associated with elec-
tricity and natural gas use. Other sources include ‘area,’ which accounts for landscape equipment, and
consumer products; ‘waste,’ which accounts for emissions associated with disposal of solid waste in
landfills, and ‘water,’ which accounts for energy associated with the delivery of potable water and the
treatment of wastewater. The estimated operational-related emissions of CO2e for source are summa-
rized in the table below. With amortized construction-period GHG emissions and annual operational
emissions, the Project would be responsible for the generation of 2,622 MT CO2e. Project CO2e emis-
sions would be less than the SCAQMD screening threshold; the Project would have a less-than-signif-
icant impact.
Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Source CO2e Emissions
(MT/Year)
Construction
2019 558
2020 80
Total 638
Total amortized over 30 years 21
Operation
Area 0.01
Energy 252
Mobile 2,318
Waste 13
Water 18
Total Operational Emissions 2,601
Total Project Emissions 2,622
SCAQMD Screening Threshold 3,000
Exceeds Screening Threshold No
Notes: CO2e = carbon dioxide equivalents (includes carbon dioxide,
methane and nitrous oxide)
MT = metric tons
Source: EDS-OB-1, 2019
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regula-
tion adopted for the purpose of reducing the
emission of greenhouse gases?
Response: (Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Report, prepared by EDS, Inc. and OB-1 Air Analyses, November 2018)
The Project would not exceed SCAQMD’s threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e for GHG and, as such, would not
have a significant impact on GHG emissions. The Project would comply with all federal, state, and local
regulations. The Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation of an agency
adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs, including AB 32 and the Climate Change
Scoping Plan. Therefore, the Project’s impact related to GHG emission reduction plans, policies, and
regulations would be less than significant.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 48 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ̶ Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use,
or disposal of hazardous materials?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, & General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012)
Construction of the Project would involve the use of potentially hazardous materials, including vehicle
fuels, oils, and transmission fluids. During the operation of the retail and restaurant businesses, typical
hazardous materials transported to and used at the site would include cleaning solvents, pesticides for
landscaping, painting supplies, and petroleum products. However, all potentially hazardous materials
used during construction or operation would be contained, stored, and used in accordance with manu-
facturers’ instructions and handled in compliance with applicable federal, state, and local standards and
regulations, which include requirements for disposal of hazardous materials at a facility licensed to ac-
cept such waste based on its waste classification and the waste acceptance criteria of the permitted
disposal facilities.
The Project includes a service station that would use underground storage tanks (USTs). Operation and
maintenance of the gasoline USTs are regulated by the California Water Resources Control Board Un-
derground Storage Tank Program. Installation and maintenance of the proposed USTs would be subject
to CCR Title 23, Chapter 16 (Underground Tank Regulations). These regulations stipulate construction
requirements for new USTs; monitoring requirements; requirements for unauthorized release report and
for repair, upgrade, and closure of USTs; and specify variance request procedures. Additional State and
Federal regulations pertaining to the under-ground storage and dispensation of flammable materials in-
clude but are not limited to the following:
• 2013 California Fire Code Title 24, Part 9 (CFC 8003.1.3.2) Spill Control Requirements;
• California Code of Regulations Title 13, Motor Vehicles Division 1, 2 and 3;
• California Code of Regulations Title 27, Environmental Protection, as applicable;
• California Mechanical Code (CMC);
• California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Industrial Relations, Chapter 4, Industrial Safety;
• Health and Safety Code, Section 13240 – 1343.6 (California Propane Storage and Handling
Safety Act); and
• National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Code Section 30a.
Air quality emissions from USTs are regulated by CARB and SCAQMD. The intent of these rules is to
minimize the release of volatile organic compounds and other hazardous vapors. This is accomplished
by vapor recovery and leak detection systems that are required to be CARB-certified and verified through
testing and reporting. SCAQMD Rule 461 applies to the transfer of gasoline from tank trucks to USTs
and the transfer of gasoline from USTs to motor vehicles. Additional regulations include CARB’s Benzene
Airborne Toxic Control Measure for Retail Service Stations (17 CCR 93101) and the Environmental Pro-
tection Agency’s National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Category: Gaso-
line Dispensing Facilities (CFR, Title 40, Part 63, Subpart CCCCCC).
The gas station operation would result in the regular transportation of gasoline to the project site. These
deliveries would occur on designated truck routes in compliance with the California Department of Motor
Vehicle standards. Collectively, the routine inspection of the gas station, the USTs, and all associated
fuel delivery infrastructure, along with the continued mandated compliance with all federal, state, and
local regulations, would ensure that the Project is operated in a non-hazardous manner. Therefore, long-
term impacts associated with handling, storing, and dispensing of hazardous materials would be less
than significant, directly, indirectly or cumulatively with compliance with all regulations concerning the
use and storage of such hazardous materials.
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the re-
lease of hazardous materials into the environ-
ment?
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 49 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, & General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012)
As described under question a), construction and operation of the Project would involve the use of po-
tentially hazardous materials. However, the transport, use, and storage of these materials is strictly reg-
ulated by federal, state and local standards. The installation and use of USTs must comply with regula-
tions that have been adopted to prevent spills and leaks. Mandatory compliance with these regulations
would ensure that the potential for impacts associated with the release of hazardous material into the
environment is less than significant directly, indirectly or cumulatively.
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous
or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, & General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012)
The closest school is the North Mountain Middle School, approximately 0.25 mile from the proposed
service station. As described under question a), compliance with federal, state and local standards per-
taining to the transport, use, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials would ensure that potential
emissions would be negligible. Accordingly, impacts associated with hazardous emissions and handling
hazardous materials would be less than significant, directly, indirectly or cumulatively.
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code section 65962.5 and, as a re-
sult, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012, EDR Radius Map Report, Environmental Data Resources, Inc, November 15, 2017)
A search of available environmental records was completed in 2017 for the project site (EDR, 2017). A
search was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The search was designed to assist
parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate
Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-
13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel
of real estate. No mapped hazardous material sites were identified on the project site or in the surround-
ing area. Therefore, this Project would have no impact directly, indirectly, or cumulatively in terms of
creating a significant hazard to the public or the environment.
e) For a project located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport or
public use airport, would the project result in a
safety hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
Response: (Source: Riverside County Land Use Commission – Hemet-Ryan Airport Plan Final 2017)
The City of San Jacinto is outside the Airport Influence Area for the Hemet-Ryan Airport and therefore,
the Project would have no impact on this public airport and there are no other private airports within two
miles of the City.
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR & General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012)
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 50 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The City’s Emergency Operation Plan describes the City’s process for responding to emergencies or
disasters. In addition, the City, along with most other jurisdictions in Riverside County, joined with the
County of Riverside to submit a Multi-Jurisdictional LHMP providing a framework for emergency re-
sponse.
Access for the Project would be provided on East Main Street, Ramona Expressway and Donna Way.
These are existing streets within the City’s established street system. The Project would not alter the
existing circulation pattern in the project area. Emergency access and evacuation routes would be unaf-
fected by the Project.
The Project provides adequate access for emergency vehicles, including adequate street widths and
vertical clearance. Implementation of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in the construction of
this Project would result in less-than-significant impacts, directly, indirectly and cumulatively to an
adopted emergency response or evacuation plan.
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or in-
directly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, Figure 5.7-1 – Fire Hazards & General
Plan EIR Addendum August 2012)
The project site is not within a High Fire Hazards Area. The Project will not expose people or structures
to significant risks associated with wildfires and therefore, no impact, directly, indirectly or cumulatively
will occur.
X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY – Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste dis-
charge requirements or otherwise substantially
degrade surface or ground water quality?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, Municipal Code Chapter 13.44 – Storm
Water Management, Chapter 16.24 – Improvements, Chapter 13.04 – Water Service, Chapter 15.40 – Floodplain Management,
Development Code Section 17.300.120 – Water Quality, Section 17.305.050 – Floodplain Management, Section 17.520.050 –
Water Quality, Section 17.600.100 – Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Required, General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012, Hydrology Study, prepared by Tuttle Engineering, March 6, 2018 & Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, pre-
pared by CWE, July 2, 2019)
The City of San Jacinto is a Co-Permittee in, and is required to comply with, the Riverside County mu-
nicipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) permit adopted by the Regional Board on January 29, 2010.
Incompliance with the MSF permit, a preliminary WQMP has been prepared for the Project. The WQMP
incorporates subsurface chambers where stormwater would be filtered, and a portion infiltrated to sub-
surface soils. The stormwater discharge volume would be limited to the estimated pre-development vol-
ume. Compliance with all WQMP requirements would be confirmed during the plan check process.
In addition, construction would be required to comply with the General Construction NPDES permit
through implementation of a SWPPP. And pursuant to Section 17.300.120 – Water Quality of the Devel-
opment Code, the Project will not be permitted to discharge any liquids into the public or private drainage
system, or into the ground. Compliance with all existing federal, state, and local water quality laws and
regulations related to water quality standards would ensure a less-than-significant impact directly,
indirectly and cumulatively to water quality and discharge.
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater re-
charge such that the project may impede sus-
tainable groundwater management of the basin?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, Municipal Code Chapter 13.44 – Storm
Water Management, Chapter 16.24 – Improvements, Chapter 13.04 – Water Service, Chapter 15.40 – Floodplain Management,
Development Code Section 17.300.120 – Water Quality, Section 17.305.050 – Floodplain Management, Section 17.520.050 –
Water Quality, Section 17.600.100 – Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Required, General Plan EIR Addendum August
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 51 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
2012, Hydrology Study, prepared by Tuttle Engineering, March 6, 2018 & Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, pre-
pared by CWE, July 2, 2019)
San Jacinto is located within the San Jacinto Groundwater Basin (Basin). The Basin underlies the cities
of San Jacinto, Perris, Moreno, and Menifee Valleys in western Riverside County. The Project would use
subsurface chambers to filter stormwater and infiltrate a portion to subsurface soils. The post-develop-
ment runoff rates would match the pre-development rates. This would ensure that groundwater recharge
on the project site is not impeded. Water supply would be provided by EMWD’s municipal system, no
on-site groundwater wells would be used. Compliance with existing federal, state, and local water quality
laws and regulations related to groundwater and would ensure Project impacts would be less than sig-
nificant, directly, indirectly and cumulatively.
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would:
i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-
site?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, Municipal Code Chapter 13.44 – Storm
Water Management, Chapter 16.24 – Improvements, Chapter 13.04 – Water Service, Chapter 15.40 – Floodplain Management,
Development Code Section 17.300.120 – Water Quality, Section 17.305.050 – Floodplain Management, Section 17.520.050 –
Water Quality, Section 17.600.100 – Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Required, General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012, Hydrology Study, prepared by Tuttle Engineering, March 6, 2018 & Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, pre-
pared by CWE, July 2, 2019)
As described under questions a) and b) above, the Project would utilize subsurface chambers to filter
stormwater and infiltrate a portion to subsurface soils. The post-development runoff rates would match
the pre-development rates. The site currently drains to an existing concrete swale bordering the western
and southern edges of the project site. The same concrete swale would be used to drain the proposed
development, and flows in the swale would not increase with project development. As such, there would
be no substantial alteration of the existing drainage pattern on the site. Potential impacts associated with
erosion or siltation would be less than significant, directly, indirectly and cumulatively.
ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of sur-
face runoff in a manner which would result in
flooding on- or offsite?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, Municipal Code Chapter 13.44 – Storm
Water Management, Chapter 16.24 – Improvements, Chapter 13.04 – Water Service, Chapter 15.40 – Floodplain Management,
Development Code Section 17.300.120 – Water Quality, Section 17.305.050 – Floodplain Management, Section 17.520.050 –
Water Quality, Section 17.600.100 – Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Required, General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012, Hydrology Study, prepared by Tuttle Engineering, March 6, 2018 & Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, pre-
pared by CWE, July 2, 2019)
See Response IX c) i) above. Implementation of these and other applicable requirements will assure
that drainage and stormwater will not exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Therefore, the Project will have
less-than-significant impact, directly, indirectly or cumulatively to the rate or amount of surface runoff
in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site.
iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm
water drainage systems or provide substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, Municipal Code Chapter 13.44 – Storm
Water Management, Chapter 16.24 – Improvements, Chapter 13.04 – Water Service, Chapter 15.40 – Floodplain Management,
Development Code Section 17.300.120 – Water Quality, Section 17.305.050 – Floodplain Management, Section 17.520.050 –
Water Quality, Section 17.600.100 – Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Required, General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012, Hydrology Study, prepared by Tuttle Engineering, March 6, 2018 & Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, pre-
pared by CWE, July 2, 2019)
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 52 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
As described throughout this section, IX, the Project will be required to comply with all applicable water
quality standards. To further minimize potential water quality degradation, runoff from the car wash pro-
posed on Parcel 8 will drain to the sanitary sewer. Project-related water quality degradation impacts will
be less than significant, directly, indirectly and cumulatively.
iv) Impede or redirect flood flows?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, Municipal Code Chapter 13.44 – Storm
Water Management, Chapter 16.24 – Improvements, Chapter 13.04 – Water Service, Chapter 15.40 – Floodplain Management,
Development Code Section 17.300.120 – Water Quality, Section 17.305.050 – Floodplain Management, Section 17.520.050 –
Water Quality, Section 17.600.100 – Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Required, General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012, Hydrology Study, prepared by Tuttle Engineering, March 6, 2018 & Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, pre-
pared by CWE, July 2, 2019)
The project site is not located in the 100-year floodplain and will not place housing or other structures in
an area that would impede or redirect flows. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) des-
ignates the project area as Zone X – area with reduced flood risk due to levee. This zone designates
areas that are located between the limits of the base flood and the 0.2-percent-annual-chance (or 500-
year) flood (FIRM Map No. 06065C1490H, April 19, 2017 and FIRM Map No. 06065C1495H, April 19,
2017). This zone designation is not a Special Flood Hazard Area on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. The
City has adopted emergency procedures for the evacuation and control of populated areas in its Emer-
gency Operations Plan and in the Riverside County LHMP. Compliance with existing federal, state, and
local flood hazard laws and regulations as they pertain to the design of the Project will result in a less-
than-significant impact, directly, indirectly and cumulatively.
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk
release of pollutants due to project inundation?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, Municipal Code Chapter 13.44 – Storm
Water Management, Chapter 16.24 – Improvements, Chapter 13.04 – Water Service, Chapter 15.40 – Floodplain Management,
Development Code Section 17.300.120 – Water Quality, Section 17.305.050 – Floodplain Management, Section 17.520.050 –
Water Quality, Section 17.600.100 – Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Required, General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012, Hydrology Study, prepared by Tuttle Engineering, March 6, 2018, Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, pre-
pared by CWE, July 2, 2019 & FEMA FIRM Maps 06065C1490H and 06065C1495H)
Seiche is a temporary disturbance or oscillation in the water level of a lake or partially enclosed body of
water, especially one caused by changes in atmospheric pressure.
Tsunami is a long high sea wave caused by an earthquake, submarine landslide, or other disturbance.
Mudflows (or debris flows) are rivers of rock, earth, and other debris saturated with water. They develop
when water rapidly accumulates in the ground, such as during heavy rainfall or rapid snowmelt, changing
the earth into a flowing river of mud.
Compliance with existing Federal, State, and local flood hazard laws and regulations as they pertain to
the design of the Project will result in a less than significant flood hazard impact, directly, indirectly,
and cumulatively.
e) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area struc-
tures which would impede or redirect flood
flows?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, Municipal Code Chapter 13.44 – Storm
Water Management, Chapter 16.24 – Improvements, Chapter 13.04 – Water Service, Chapter 15.40 – Floodplain Management,
Development Code Section 17.300.120 – Water Quality, Section 17.305.050 – Floodplain Management, Section 17.520.050 –
Water Quality, Section 17.600.100 – Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Required, General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012, Hydrology Study, prepared by Tuttle Engineering, March 6, 2018, Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, prepared
by CWE, July 2, 2019 & FEMA FIRM Maps 06065C1490H and 06065C1495H)
The project site is not located in the 100-year floodplain and will not place housing or other structures in
an area that would impede or redirect flows. Compliance with existing federal, state, and local flood
hazard laws and regulations as they pertain to the design of the Project will result in a less-than-signif-
icant impact, directly, indirectly and cumulatively.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 53 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
f) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a wa-
ter quality control plan or sustainable groundwa-
ter management plan?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, Municipal Code Chapter 13.44 – Storm
Water Management, Chapter 16.24 – Improvements, Chapter 13.04 – Water Service, Chapter 15.40 – Floodplain Management,
Development Code Section 17.300.120 – Water Quality, Section 17.305.050 – Floodplain Management, Section 17.520.050 –
Water Quality, Section 17.600.100 – Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Required, General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012, Hydrology Study, prepared by Tuttle Engineering, March 6, 2018 & Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan, pre-
pared by CWE, July 2, 2019 & FEMA FIRM Maps 06065C1490H and 06065C1495H)
The Project is required to comply with the City’s Municipal Code, the Riverside County Drainage Area
Management Plan, and Riverside County MS4 permit all of which contain regulations to meet Federal
and State water quality requirements related to water quality and groundwater. Therefore, the Project
will be designed for compliance with existing federal, state, and local water quality laws and regulations
related to water quality standards which will ensure a less than significant impact, directly, indirectly,
or cumulatively, to the water quality control plan and groundwater management plan.
XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING ̶ Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, & General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012)
The project site is an undeveloped site designated and zoned for commercial land uses. An existing
residential neighborhood is located directly west of the project site. This community would not be physi-
cally divided by the Project. The Project would not alter traffic patterns or otherwise limit access to and
from the community. The Project would result in no impact directly, indirectly or cumulatively with re-
gards to dividing an established community.
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to
a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regu-
lation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, & General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012)
Most of the proposed uses would be allowed under the existing zoning restrictions. This includes the
proposed retail buildings and fast food restaurants. However, the proposed rezone would allow uses that
are currently prohibited by the current Commercial Neighborhood zone. Specifically, rezoning the site
from Commercial Neighborhood to Commercial General would allow the development of the proposed
service station and car wash. The Commercial General zone is appropriate to the site due to its location
on Ramona Expressway, designated by the City as an Urban Arterial, and East Main Street, designated
by the City as a Secondary Roadway.
All of the proposed land uses are consistent with the underlying General Plan designation and are com-
patible with surrounding land uses. The proposed rezone of the project site from Commercial Neighbor-
hood to Commercial General would be consistent with the existing General Plan land use designation of
Community Commercial as identified in Table LU-1 General Plan and Zoning Consistency Matrix of the
San Jacinto General Plan and Section 17.220.010 of the San Jacinto Development Code. No amend-
ments of the General Plan are required. No land uses are proposed that have the potential to adversely
impact the general welfare of persons residing in the community. The proposed retail buildings on the
west side of the project site would be located approximately 90 feet from existing homes to the west.
These proposed retail uses would be consistent with existing zoning and development standards, and
are considered compatible uses within the General Plan.
The Project would provide commercial uses consistent with the requested zone change. Therefore, no
impact directly, indirectly or cumulatively to any land use plans would occur.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 54 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XII. MINERAL RESOURCES ̶ Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known min-
eral resource that would be of value to the region
and the residents of the state?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, & General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012)
According to the California Geological Survey Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) Mineral
Land Classification system, the City of San Jacinto has been classified as MRZ-1. MRZ-1 are areas
where geologic information indicates no significant mineral deposits are present. Therefore, imple-
mentation of the Project will have no impact directly, indirectly or cumulatively on mineral re-
sources.
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-im-
portant mineral resource recovery site delineated
on a local general plan, specific plan or other
land use plan?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, & General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012)
The project site is not delineated for mineral resources in a local general plan, specific plan or other land
use plan and will therefore, have no impact, directly, indirectly or cumulatively to the availability of an
important mineral resources.
XIII. NOISE ̶ Would the project result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or per-
manent increase in ambient noise levels in the
vicinity of the project in excess of standards es-
tablished in the local general plan or noise ordi-
nance, or applicable standards of other agen-
cies?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Noise Element Figure N-1 – Future Noise Contours, General
Plan EIR, Figure 5.10.1 – Future Noise Contours, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, Municipal Code Chapter 8.40 –
Noise Control & Noise Assessment, prepared by Ldn Consulting, Inc., July 15, 2019)
dBA = A-weighted sound level in decibels as measured on a sound level meter using the A-weighted
filter network. The A-weighting filter de-emphasizes the very low and very high frequency components
of the sound in a manner similar to the response of the human ear. A numerical method of rating human
judgement of loudness.
Leq = Equivalent Sound Level – the sound level corresponding to a steady noise level over a given
sample period with the same amount of acoustic energy as the actual time varying noise level. The
energy average noise level during the sample period.
CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level. – the average equivalent A-weighted sound level during a
24-hour day, obtained after addition of five (5) decibels to sound levels in the evening from 7:00 to 10:00
p.m. and after addition of ten (10) decibels to sound levels in the night before 7:00 a.m. and after 10:00
p.m.
The City of San Jacinto Noise Control Ordinance (Municipal Code Section 8.40) limits exterior noise
levels for single-family residential areas to 65 dBA Leq from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and 45 dBA Leq
from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. The Noise Control Ordinance allows for interior noise levels of 45 dBA from
7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and 40 dBA from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. (Section 8.40.040). Construction noise
that exceeds these noise levels is exempted from this standard if it occurs between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00
p.m. on weekdays and Saturdays. Construction (and associated noise) is prohibited on Sundays and
federal holidays. Emergency construction work is exempted when authorized by the city manager or his
or her designee (Municipal Code Section 8.40.090). Noise generated by real property maintenance is
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 55 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
limited by Section 8.40.080. Operation of equipment to maintain real property in a manner that produces
loud noise that disturbs a person on normal sensitivity who works or resides in the vicinity is prohibited,
except between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.
The Noise Assessment prepared for the Project analyzed the existing noise environment as follows:
Short-Term Noise Measurement Results
To determine the existing noise environment and to assess potential noise impacts, a 24-hour measure-
ment was taken at the project site along the western property line. This was done to determine the ex-
isting conditions at the nearest residences. The noise measurements were recorded on September 12-
13, 2018 by Ldn Consulting between approximately 4:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m., the following day. Two
noise measurements were taken. Location M1 is 140 feet south of Main Street and location M2 is 440
feet south of Main Street. The results of the noise level measurement are presented in the table below.
The existing noise levels in the project area consisted primarily of traffic along Main Street, and back-
ground noise from the Ramona Expressway in the distance.
Short-Term Noise Measurement Data (dBA)
Location Date Leq CNEL
M1 9/12-13/2018 49.3 54.7
M2 9/12-13/2018 45.4 50.5
Construction Noise
Noise from construction activities would add to the existing noise environment of the project site and
immediate vicinity. Sensitive receptors located near the project site could be exposed to construction-
related noise. The closest sensitive receptors are residents located west of the project site where homes
are located within 40 feet of the project site. A six-foot high masonry wall separates the residential de-
velopment from the project site.
Construction noise is considered a short-term impact and would be considered significant if construction
activities are taken outside the allowable times as described in the City’s Municipal Code (Section
8.40.090). Construction is anticipated to occur during the permissible hours according the City’s Munici-
pal Code. Construction noise will have a temporary or periodic increase in the ambient noise level above
the existing within the project vicinity.
Construction noise levels are rarely steady in nature, but instead fluctuate depending on the number and
type of equipment in use at any given time. Individual construction activities would generate maximum
noise level ranges of 76 to 90 dBA at a distance of 50 feet. Where multiple noise sources are operating,
the combined noise level could reach a maximum of 93 dBA at a distance of 50 feet. Noise levels would
vary depending on the location of equipment on the project site. The center of the project site is approx-
imately 400 feet from the nearest homes; at this distance, assuming a typical attenuation rate of 6 dBA
per doubling of distance, noise levels from equipment are expected to reach a maximum of 75 dBA.
Construction operations must follow the City’s General Plan and the Noise Ordinance, which states that
construction, repair or excavation work performed must occur within the permissible hours. To further
ensure that construction activities do not disrupt the adjacent land uses, the following mitigation
measures are proposed. The impact is considered less than significant with mitigation.
MM NOI 1 – Permissible Hours
Construction shall occur during the permissible hours as defined in Section 8.40.090.
MM NOI 2 – Noise Attenuating Devices
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 56 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
During construction, the contactor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with appro-
priate noise attenuating devices.
MM NOI 3 – Staging Area Location
The contractor shall locate equipment staging areas that will create the greatest distance between
construction-related noise/vibration sources and sensitive receptors nearest the project site during
all project construction.
MM NOI 4 – Idling Restriction
Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use.
Operational Noise from Car Wash
The car wash proposed on Parcel 8 would have two dominate noise sources – an air dryer provided at
the end of the automated service and vacuum units that may be provided independently. Based noise
measurements on typical equipment, these noise sources have a potential to generate maximum noise
levels of 80 dBA and 73.6 dBA respectively, near the units. Because these units would not operate
continuously, when adjusted for estimated run time during a peak operational hour, the adjusted noise
levels would be approximately 74.8 dBA and 71.4 dBA respectively, near the units.
The residential property line is located over 540 feet to the west and the proposed convenience store
would also block direct line of site, shielding the equipment noise from the residences. Utilizing the
adjusted operational times and distance, the anticipated unshielded noise level was determined to be
40 dBA. Therefore, the proposed operations of the carwash and service station would not exceed the
City’s daytime residential threshold of 65 dBA and the most restrictive nighttime residential threshold of
45 dBA. Therefore, no additional noise reductions would be required.
Operational Noise from Drive-through Restaurants
In order to examine the potential stationary noise source impacts associated with the operation of the
proposed fast food restaurants, reference noise levels were used for the menu board and speaker post.
The reference noise level of the speaker board is 54 dBA CNEL at 32 feet. The future drive-through
speakers are located 415 feet and 615 feet from the nearest residential property line to the west and
resulting in an anticipated noise level of approximately 33 dBA. Therefore, the proposed operations of
the fast food restaurant and drive-through would not exceed the City’s daytime threshold of 65 dBA and
the most restrictive nighttime threshold of 45 dBA. Therefore, no additional noise reductions would be
required.
Operational Noise from Deliveries and Trash Trucks
Noise from trucks making deliveries and collecting recycling and solid waste would occur on an infre-
quent but regular basis. This noise would be most noticeable at the retail buildings on the western side
of the project site, as these areas are closest to the adjacent residential area.
In order to evaluate the truck delivery noise impacts, the analysis utilized reference noise level meas-
urements taken at a shopping center. The measurements include truck drive-by noise, truck load-
ing/unloading and truck engine noise. The unmitigated exterior noise levels for truck drive-by noise and
truck engine noise were measured at 66.5 dBA Leq at a distance of 25-feet from the loading dock. A
truck will take approximately 2 minutes to drive in the site and position itself, less than 30 minutes to be
unloaded and another 2 minutes to exit the site. During the loading/unloading of the truck the engine
can only idle for five (5) minutes in compliance with State air quality requirements. To be conservative,
it was assumed the truck engine could be operating for 15 minutes of the total time required during the
delivery process (5 minutes at arrival, 5 minutes of idle and 5 minutes at departure).
The delivery trucks for the proposed retail uses on the western portion of the site will travel along the
western property line and the nearest sensitive receptors to the project site include the single-family
property line to the west approximately 50 feet from the trucks that will also be shielded by the existing
6-foot CMU wall. The distance would result in a reduction of 6 decibels, resulting in an overall noise
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 57 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
level of 60.5 dBA at the property line. The existing 6-foot wall would provide a small amount of addi-
tional noise reduction that has not been accounted for to be conservative. The proposed operations of
the delivery trucks would not exceed the City’s daytime threshold of 65 dBA. However, if deliveries oc-
cur during the nighttime or early hours (10 pm to 7 am) potential noise impacts could occur at the resi-
dential structures to the west.
Two trash and recycling enclosures would be located along the southern boundary, while three other
trash and recycling enclosures would be located within the internal parking areas. The nearest trash
and recycling enclosure would be 160 feet from the western property line. Noise associated with rolling
the dumpsters and noise from the waste collection vehicle would be partly screened by the existing 6-
foot masonry wall surrounding the adjacent residential development. As provided in Section 8.40.080
of the City of San Jacinto Noise Control Ordinance, loud noise associated with property maintenance is
prohibited unless it occurs between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.
To further ensure that noise from deliveries and waste collection do not disrupt the adjacent land uses
during nighttime and early morning hours, the following mitigation measures are proposed. The impact
is considered less than significant with mitigation.
MM NOI 5 – Solid Waste and Recycling Collection
Solid Waste and recycling collection shall only occur during daytime hours (7:00 a.m. and 7:00
p.m.).
MM NOI 6 – Truck Deliveries
Truck deliveries shall only occur during daytime hours (7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.).
Operational Noise from Parking Lots
Traffic associated with parking lots is typically not of sufficient volume to exceed community noise
standards, which are based on a time-averaged scale. However, the instantaneous sound levels gen-
erated by a car door slamming and engine starting up may be an annoyance to adjacent sensitive re-
ceptors. The estimated maximum noise levels associated with parking lot activities typically range from
60-65 dBA and are short term. It should be noted that parking lot noise are instantaneous noise levels
compared to noise standards, which are averaged over time. As a result, actual noise levels over time
resulting from parking lot activities would be far lower. Therefore, based on the limited operational time
of vehicles on-site, distance separation, intervening buildings and the existing 6-foot CMU wall on the
western property line, parking lot noise is not expected to exceed daytime or nighttime noise standards.
Operational Noise from Mechanical Ventilation
Heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) units would be installed on the roof of the proposed
buildings. Typically, mechanical equipment noise is 70-80 dBA at a distance of 3 feet from 3-ton to 10-
ton units. HVAC units would be included on the roof of the proposed buildings and would be shielded
by a mechanical screen and/or the roof parapet, which would further reduce the noise. The HVAC units
on most of the site would be located over 400 feet from the residential property line to the west, with
the exception of the two retail buildings on the western portion of the site. The two retail buildings
would be roughly 70 feet from the property line and 100 feet from the residential structures. The HVAC
units will be set-back from the edge of the buildings at least 5 feet, resulting in a separation of 75 feet
from the property line.
To determine the noise levels associated with the HVAC units on those two buildings, the higher noise
level of 80 dBA at 3 feet for each anticipated HVAC unit was utilized and as many as four HVAC units
would be in close proximity to each other and would operate at the same time. To predict the worst-
case future noise environment, continuous reference noise levels were used to represent the mechani-
cal ventilation system. Even though the mechanical ventilation system will cycle on and off throughout
the day, this approach presents the worst-case noise condition.
Utilizing a 6 dBA decrease per doubling of distance, noise levels at the edge of the nearest property
line to the west at the distances shown above were calculated for all the mechanical units. The worst
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 58 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
case combined noise from the HVAC would occur from a handful of units located on the roofs of the
proposed retail buildings once fully constructed. As can be seen in the table below, the proposed
HVAC noise levels would not exceed the City’s daytime threshold of 65 dBA but would be in exceed-
ance of the nighttime standard of 45 dBA without mitigation. Details on the mitigation are provided be-
low.
Unshielded HVAC Noise Levels (Nearest Property Line)
Receptor
Distance
Separation
(Feet)
Reference
Noise Level
(dBA)
Quantity
Cumulative
Noise Level
(dBA)
Noise Reduc-
tion Due to
Distance
(dBA)
Receptor
Noise
Level
Western Property Line 75
80 4 86
-28.0 58
Residence Ground Level 100 -30.4 56
Residence Second Level 100 -30.4 56
To further ensure that noise from HVAC equipment on the roofs of the retail buildings on the west side
of Parcels 1 and 2 do not disrupt the adjacent land uses during nighttime hours, the following mitigation
measure is proposed. The Noise Assessment prepared for the Project determined that incorporation of
a parapet or acoustical screening two feet in height above the top of the HVAC units would reduce
noise levels at the adjacent residential property line to 45 dBA or less. The impact is considered less
than significant with mitigation.
MM NOI 7 – HVAC Shielding on Retail Buildings
All HVAC units on the roofs of the retail buildings on Parcels 1 and 2 shall be shielded to maintain
the nighttime standard of 45 dBA at the adjacent residential property line. A parapet or acoustic
screen shall be provided that extends two feet in height above the top of the HVAC units. A noise
control analysis of the HVAC plans and specifications shall be provided prior to issuance of building
permits to ensure that the HVAC units would not exceed the 45 dBA standard at the adjacent resi-
dential property line.
Noise Impacts to Off-Site Receptors Due to Project Generated Traffic
A significant off-site traffic noise impact would occur if the Project resulted in or created a significant
increase in the existing ambient noise levels. Studies have shown that the average human ear can
barely perceive a change in sound level of 3 dBA. A change of at least 5 dBA is considered a readily
perceivable change in a normal environment. A 10-dBA increase is subjectively heard as a doubling in
loudness and would cause a community response. Based on these concepts of noise level increase
and perception, if an area is already exposed to noise levels in excess of the land use compatibility
guidelines and noise levels were to result in greater than a 3 dBA increase, then the impact would be
considered significant.
The off-site Project-related roadway segment noise levels projected in the Noise Assessment were cal-
culated using the methods in the Highway Noise Model published by the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model, FHWA-RD-77-108, December, 1978). The FHWA
Model uses the traffic volume, vehicle mix, speed, and roadway geometry to compute the equivalent
noise level. A spreadsheet calculation was used which computes equivalent noise levels for each of the
time periods used in the calculation of CNEL. Weighting these equivalent noise levels and summing
them gives the CNEL for the traffic projections. To determine if direct off-site noise level increases as-
sociated with the development of the Project. The noise levels for the existing conditions were compared
with the noise level increase of existing plus the Project, utilizing the traffic volumes provided for the
Project by Michael Baker International (MBI), 2018.
The table below presents the comparison of noise levels on nearby roadways with and without the Pro-
ject. The roadway segment noise levels will increase from 0.1 dBA CNEL to 0.8 dBA CNEL with the
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 59 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
development of the Project. The Project does not create a noise level increase on any roadway segment
that will cause a significant impact to any existing or future noise sensitive land uses.
Project Related Change in Traffic Noise Levels
Roadway Segment
Existing
Noise Level
@ 50-Feet
(dBA CNEL)
Existing +
Project Noise
Level @ 50-
Feet (dBA
CNEL)
Project Related
Direct Noise
Level Increase
(dBA CNEL)
Ramona Expressway
North of East Main Street 72.2 72.4 0.2
East Main Street to Project Driveway #2 73.9 74.2 0.3
Project Driveway #2 to Donna Way 74.0 74.1 0.1
Donna Way to East 7th Street 73.9 74.1 0.2
South of East 7th Street 73.8 74.0 0.2
East Main Street
West of Hewitt Street 66.5 66.9 0.4
Hewitt Street to Project Driveway #1 66.0 66.7 0.7
Project Driveway #1 to Ramona Expressway 64.6 65.4 0.8
Lake Park Drive
Ramona Expressway to Soboba Road 67.3 67.5 0.2
East 7th Street
Hewitt Street to Las Rosas Drive 65.8 66.3 0.5
Las Rosas Drive to Donna Way 65.7 66.4 0.7
Donna Way to Ramona Expressway 63.3 63.7 0.4
Note: Sound Levels provided are worst-case and do not take into account topography or shielding from barriers.
Short-term and long-term noise impacts associated with the Project are considered less than significant
with mitigation, directly, indirectly and cumulatively.
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vi-
bration or groundborne noise levels?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Noise Element Figure N-1 – Future Noise Contours, General
Plan EIR, Figure 5.10.1 – Future Noise Contours, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012 & Municipal Code Chapter 8.40 –
Noise Control)
Construction activities can produce vibration that may be felt by adjacent land uses. The construction of
the Project would not require the use of equipment such as pile drivers, which are known to generate
substantial construction vibration levels. The primary vibration source during construction may be from a
bulldozer. A large bulldozer has a vibration impact of 0.089 inches per second peak particle velocity
(PPV) at 25 feet which is perceptible but below any risk to architectural damage. The distance of the
construction equipment will be at least 40 feet or more from any existing structure.
The City requires all construction activities to comply with the limits (maximum noise levels, hours and
days of allowed activity) established in the City noise regulations Municipal Code Chapter 8.40 – Noise
Control to reduce impacts associated with temporary construction noise and vibration to the extent
feasible. The Project will have a less-than-significant impact on the generation of excessive ground-
borne vibration.
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a pri-
vate airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 60 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Noise Element Figure N-1 – Future Noise Contours, General
Plan EIR, Figure 5.10.1 – Future Noise Contours, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, Municipal Code Chapter 8.40 –
Noise Control & Riverside County Land Use Commission – Hemet-Ryan Airport Plan Final 2017)
There are no private airports within two miles of the City, and this project site is outside the Hemet Ryan
Airport Plan; therefore, this Project will have no impact, directly, indirectly, or cumulatively to exposing
people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise.
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING ̶ Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area,
either directly (for example, by proposing new
homes and businesses) or indirectly (for exam-
ple, through extension of road or other infrastruc-
ture)?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, & General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012)
The Project will not induce growth as it is consistent with the City’s General Plan land use designation of
CC – Community Commercial. The City’s General Plan establishes the development potential of the
City to accommodate the City’s growth to 2020. The Project, as proposed, will help to accommodate
that growth, but will not induce it.
The project site is located on existing streets, and utilities and public facilities are all available in the
immediate area. No new road or utility infrastructure is required. Project-related impacts are expected to
be less than significant directly, indirectly and cumulatively.
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people
or housing, necessitating the construction of re-
placement housing elsewhere?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, & General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012)
The project site is vacant and will not displace any persons, or require the construction of replacement
housing. Therefore, there is no impact to housing.
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES ̶ Would the project:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts
associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant en-
vironmental impacts, in order to maintain ac-
ceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public ser-
vices:
Fire protection?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, & General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012)
The Project is located approximately 1.4 miles from Fire Station #25 located at 132 S. San Jacinto Ave-
nue. As a result, fire personnel will be able to reach the site within the recommended response time. The
Fire Department will approve the Project site plan to ensure it meets applicable fire standards and regu-
lations.
As referenced in Section VIII – Hazards and Hazardous Materials, the Project will be designed consistent
with the California Building Code and the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Code require-
ments for fueling stations and onsite storage of flammable material such as gasoline and diesel and
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 61 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
related state regulations governing the design and operation of fueling facilities. Like any development
project, the Project may increase demand for fire service; however, the Project is consistent with the
General Plan land use designation for the site and would not increase the population beyond what was
anticipated in the General Plan. Further, the Project would be designed and constructed consistent with
applicable codes and standards for access and fire suppression infrastructure. The Project will not re-
quire the construction of a new fire station to maintain service ratios. Through the implementation of all
regulations and City policies for development projects, the Project will have a less than significant
impact on fire services, directly, indirectly, and cumulatively.
Police protection?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, & General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012)
Development of the site would result in additional facilities that would need to be provided with police
protection. The Project incorporates features that would limit the demand for police protection. These
features include adequate site and security lighting, and security cameras. In addition, the Police De-
partment will review site plans to ensure all applicable fire and public safety codes are met. Through
project design and code enforcement, the potential increase for police protection services would be min-
imized. The existing police facilities would be sufficient to maintain acceptable service ratios and re-
sponse times. The Project would have a less than significant impact directly, indirectly, and cumula-
tively on public services and would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with
providing additional government facilities.
Schools?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Community Services & Facilities Element Figure CSF-1 –
School Districts, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, San Jacinto Unified School District 2015 Facilities
Master Plan)
The Project is located within the service area boundary of the San Jacinto Unified School District. The
Project is required to pay the state-mandated school fees in place at the time that development occurs.
These fees are designed to mitigate impacts to schools by providing funds for the construction of new
facilities.
The Project would result in the development of a retail center, fast food restaurants and service station
with a car wash. These proposed land uses would increase employment and economic activity within the
city of San Jacinto. The retail and restaurant employees are expected to be existing residents of San
Jacinto, Hemet and other nearby communities. The businesses are not expected to attract a substantial
number of new employees that would relocate to the area. Accordingly, the proposed development is not
expected to result in an increase in service demand or the need to provide additional school facilities to
serve new residents.
Through the implementation of all regulations and City and School District policies for development pro-
jects, the Project will have a less than significant impact on schools, directly, indirectly and cumula-
tively.
Parks?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Community Services and Facilities Element Figure CSF-3
– Parks & Public Facilities, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, Parks Master Plan, November 2005,
Municipal Code Chapter 16.40 – Park Dedications and Fees & Chapter 15.36 – Park and Open Space Development Fees)
The City has a broad range of available recreation facilities, programs, and parks. As noted above, the
retail and restaurant employees are expected to be existing residents of San Jacinto, Hemet and other
nearby communities. The businesses are not expected to attract a substantial number of new employees
that would relocate to the area. Accordingly, the proposed development is not expected to result in an
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 62 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
increase in service demand or the need to provide additional parks to serve new residents. The Project
will have a less than significant impact on parks, directly, indirectly and cumulatively.
Other public facilities?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Community Services and Facilities Element Figure CSF-3
– Parks & Public Facilities, CSF-4 – Trails Opportunities Map, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, Parks
Master Plan, November 2005, Municipal Code Chapter 16.40 – Park Dedications and Fees & Chapter 15.36 – Park and Open
Space Development Fees)
As noted above, the Project will not result in an increase in demand for other City services and facilities,
including recreational trails and library services. Therefore, no impacts to other public facilities will occur
directly, indirectly and cumulatively.
XVI. RECREATION ̶ Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other recreational facilities such
that substantial physical deterioration of the facil-
ity would occur or be accelerated?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Community Services and Facilities Element Figure CSF-3
– Parks & Public Facilities, CSF-4 – Trails Opportunities Map, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, Parks
Master Plan, November 2005, Municipal Code Chapter 16.40 – Park Dedications and Fees & Chapter 15.36 – Park and Open
Space Development Fees)
The City and Valley-Wide Recreation provide a broad range of recreation facilities, programs, and parks.
The City established a park ratio of 5.0 acres of developed parkland for every 1,000 residents. The City’s
Parks Master Plan details recommendations and standards to meet park facility demand. There are 83.5
acres of parks and recreational facilities (General Plan Table CSF-1 – Existing Parks and Recreational
Facilities) with another 50 acres planned (General Plan Table CSF-2 – Planned Parks and Recrea-
tional Facilities).
As described under Response XIV a) above, the proposed land uses would increase employment and
economic activity within the city of San Jacinto. However, the retail and restaurant employees are ex-
pected to be existing residents of San Jacinto, Hemet and other nearby communities. The businesses
are not expected to attract a substantial number of new employees that would relocate to the area.
Accordingly, the proposed development is not expected to result in an increase in demand for recrea-
tional facilities. The Project will have a less than significant impact on recreational facilities, directly,
indirectly and cumulatively.
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of recrea-
tional facilities which have an adverse physical
effect on the environment?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Community Services and Facilities Element Figure CSF-3
– Parks & Public Facilities, CSF-4 – Trails Opportunities Map, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, Parks
Master Plan, November 2005, Municipal Code Chapter 16.40 – Park Dedications and Fees & Chapter 15.36 – Park and Open
Space Development Fees)
The Project does not include the construction of recreational facilities or require the need to construct
recreational facilities. The Project will have no impact, directly, indirectly or cumulatively on recreational
facilities.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 63 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XVII. TRANSPORTATION ̶ Would the project:
a) Conflict with program plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation system, including
transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Circulation Element Table C-1 – Overview of Street Classi-
fications, Figure C-1 – Roadway Cross Sections, Figure C-2 – Roadway System, Figure C-4 – Bikeways, Figure C-5 – Standard
Bikeway Cross Sections, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, Figure 5.13-5 – Proposed City of San
Jacinto General Plan Network, Figure 5.13-6 – General Plan Roadway Cross-Sections, Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by Mi-
chael Baker International, June 25, 2019 & Striping and Striping Plans, prepared by Michael Baker International, May, 2019)
A traffic impact analysis was completed for the Project by Michael Baker International. The study ana-
lyzes the forecast traffic conditions associated with the Project. The study evaluates the following seven
intersections in the vicinity of the project site:
1. East Main Street / Hewitt Street
2. Ramona Expressway / East Main Street-Lake Park Drive
3. Lake Park Drive / Soboba Road
4. Ramona Expressway / Donna Way
5. East 7th Street / Las Rosas Drive
6. East 7th Street / Donna Way
7. Ramona Expressway / East 7th Street
It should be noted that the intersection of Ramona Expressway and Donna Way (Intersection 4) operates
as a right-in/right-out minor street stop-controlled intersection.
In addition, the Project would have a total of three points of vehicular access. The following Project
access driveways have been included as study intersection locations:
8. East Main Street / Project Driveway #1
9. Ramona Expressway / Project Driveway #2
10. Donna Way / Project Driveway #3
The driveways located on Main Street and Ramona Expressway would operate as a right-in/right-out
only access. The driveways located on Donna Way would operate as full access unsignalized intersec-
tions.
These study locations have been analyzed in the following study scenarios:
• Existing Conditions;
• Existing With Project Conditions;
• Existing Plus Cumulative Conditions;
• Existing Plus Cumulative With Project Conditions
Level of Service
Level of Service (LOS) is commonly used as a qualitative description of intersection operation and is
based on the capacity of the intersection and the volume of traffic using the intersection. The Highway
Capacity Manual (HCM) 2010 analysis methodology is utilized to determine the operation LOS of the
study intersections. The HCM analysis methodology describes the operation of an intersection using a
range of level of service from LOS A (free-flow conditions) to LOS F (Severely congested conditions),
based on the corresponding stopped delay experienced per vehicle for study intersections. The City of
San Jacinto has adopted level of service “D“ or better as acceptable operating conditions for intersections
during the peak hour.
Trip Generation
To calculate the number of vehicle trips generated by the Project, the trip rates provided in the Institute
of Transportation Engineers (ITE) 9th Edition Trip Generation Manual were used. These rates were ad-
justed to account for “pass-by trips” which are existing trips deviated from the surrounding roadway net-
work to access the project site, and “internal trips” in which a person visits more than one destination
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 64 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
onsite during the same visit. Based on this methodology, the Project is forecast to generate approxi-
mately 4,144 trips per day, with approximately 307 trips occurring during the AM peak hour and approx-
imately 314 trips occurring during the PM peak hour.
Existing Plus Project Conditions
The table below summarizes Existing Conditions and Existing with Project Conditions AM and PM peak
hour level of service for all study intersections.
Existing Conditions and Existing Plus Project Level of Service
Study Intersection
Traffic
Control
Existing Conditions
Existing
with Project
Conditions
AM
Delay /
LOS
PM
Delay /
LOS
AM
Delay /
LOS
PM
Delay /
LOS
1 - E. Main St. / Hewitt St. AWSC 10.6 - B 10.0 - A 11.2 - B 10.5 - B
2 - Ramona Expwy. / Main St.-Lake
Park Dr. Signal 22.3 - C 41.0 - D 24.4 - C 48.7 - D
3 - Lake Park Dr. / Soboba Rd. Signal 18.7 - B 24.2 - C 18.9 - B 24.9 - C
4 - Ramona Expwy. / Donna Way Signal1 10.0 - B 12.5 - B 12.4 - B 8.0 - A
5 - E. 7th St. / Las Rosas Dr. AWSC 10.9 - B 8.5 - A 11.6 - B 8.8 - A
6 - E. 7th St. / Donna Way OWSC 9.5 - A 9.0 - A 11.2 - B 10.8 - B
7 - Ramona Expwy. / E. 7th St. Signal 15.4 - B 12.4 - B 15.5 - B 13.2 - B
8 - E. Main St. / Project Driveway #1 OWSC DNE DNE 9.3 - A 9.2 - A
9 - Ramona Expwy. / Project Drive-
way #2 OWSC DNE DNE 10.5 - B 14.0 - B
10 - Donna Way / Project Driveway
#3 OWSC DNE DNE 10.7 - B 10.4 - B
Notes: Deficient intersection operation indicated in bold.
Delay = average seconds of delay per vehicle.
LOS = level of service
DNE = does not exist
AWSC = all way stop control
OWSC = one way stop control
1 - Project proposes to construct traffic signal at Ramona Expressway/Donna Way. Therefore, analyzed as a
signal with the project.
All study intersections are forecast to operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS D or better) during
the peak hours with the addition of Project-related traffic to existing traffic volumes. Therefore, no signif-
icant impacts were identified under Existing with Project Conditions and no mitigations measures are
required.
The table below summarizes Cumulative Conditions and Cumulative with Project Conditions AM and PM
peak hour level of service for all study intersections.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 65 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Cumulative and Cumulative Plus Project Level of Service
Study Intersection
Traffic
Control
Cumulative Con-
ditions
Cumulative With
Project
AM
Delay /
LOS
PM
Delay/
LOS
AM
Delay/
LOS
PM
Delay /
LOS
1 - E. Main St. / Hewitt St. AWSC 97.2 - F 159.3 - F 116.8 - F 182.0 - F
2 - Ramona Expwy. / Main St.-Lake
Park Dr. Signal 66.5 - E 176.3 - F 66.5 - E 176.7 - F
3 - Lake Park Dr. / Soboba Rd. 1 Signal 17.2 - B 25.6 - C 19.8 - B 26.6 - C
4 - Ramona Expwy. / Donna Way Signal2 12.0 - B 15.9 - C 7.4 - A 7.1 - A
5 - E. 7th St. / Las Rosas Dr. AWSC 11.4 - B 8.6 - A 12.1 - B 9.0 - A
6 - E. 7th St. / Donna Way OWSC 9.6 - A 9.1 - A 11.4 - B 10.6 - B
7 - Ramona Expwy. / E. 7th St. Signal 21.1 - C 16.6 - B 22.8 - C 17.8 - B
8 - E. Main St. / Project Driveway #1 OWSC DNE DNE 11.3 - B 11.7 - B
9 - Ramona Expwy. / Project Drive-
way #2 OWSC DNE DNE 11.9 - B 17.8 - C
10 - Donna Way / Project Driveway
#3 OWSC DNE DNE 10.8 - B 10.4 - B
Notes: Deficient intersection operation indicated in bold.
Delay = average seconds of delay per vehicle.
LOS = level of service
DNE = does not exist
AWSC = all way stop control
OWSC = one way stop control
1 - Includes intersections improvements due to construction of Soboba Casino Project
2 - Project proposes to construct traffic signal at Ramona Expressway/Donna Way. Therefore, analyzed as a
signal with the project.
All study intersections are forecast to operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS D or better) during
the peak hours under Cumulative and Cumulative with Project conditions with the following exceptions:
1. East Main Street / Hewitt Street – PM peak hour, LOS F
2. Ramona Expressway / East Main Street-Lake Park Drive – PM peak hour, LOS F
Because these intersections do not operate at an acceptable level of service, the addition of Project-
related traffic would result in a significant impact and requires mitigation. With implementation of the
following mitigation measures, the intersections would operate at acceptable levels of service (as shown
in the table below) and the Project would have a less than significant impact with mitigation directly,
indirectly or cumulatively.
MM TRAF 1 – Main Street/Hewitt Street Intersection Improvements
The project applicant shall make a fair share contribution to the construction of a signal at this loca-
tion.
MM TRAF 2 – Ramona Expressway/Main Street-Lake Park Drive Intersection Improvements
The project applicant shall restripe the eastbound approach to include one left turn lane, one
through lane, and one shared through/right turn lane.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 66 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Mitigated Cumulative and Cumulative Plus Project Level of Service
Study Intersection
Traffic
Control
Existing Plus Cumulative With
Project Conditions - Mitigated
AM PM
Delay - LOS Delay - LOS
1 - E. Main St. / Hewitt St. Signal 22.5 - C 24.7 - C
2 - Ramona Expwy. / E. Main St.-Lake Park Dr. Signal Not Impacted 54.6 - D
Notes: Deficient intersection operation indicated in bold.
Delay = average seconds of delay per vehicle.
Public Transit Services
The site is located close to existing transit service, with Riverside Transit Agency Bus Route 42 providing
direct access and connections to other lines. Existing bus stops are located on East Main Street at Mir-
acle Drive, approximately 600 feet from the project site. Development of the Project would not interfere
with these bus stops. In addition, site plan includes the development of a bus stop and shelter in coop-
eration with RTA. Impacts to public transit would be less than significant directly, indirectly or cumula-
tively.
Bicycles
The site plan includes bicycle racks consistent with CALGreen requirements. These include both short-
and long-term storage facilities. The site plan also includes the development of a Class I bike lane/multi-
use lane along Ramona Expressway. Impacts to public transit would be less than significant directly,
indirectly or cumulatively.
Pedestrian
The site plan includes sidewalks, crosswalks, ADA ramps, and decorative trellis as pedestrian facilities
that tie into existing sidewalks along East Main Street and Ramona Expressway. The Project would not
conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for alternative transportation; therefore, impacts would be
less than significant directly, indirectly or cumulatively.
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines
section 15064.31 or will conflict with an applica-
ble congestion management program, including,
but not limited to, level of service standards and
travel demand measures, or other standards es-
tablished by the county congestion management
agency for designated roads or highways?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Circulation Element Table C-1 – Overview of Street Classi-
fications, Figure C-1 – Roadway Cross Sections, Figure C-2 – Roadway System, Figure C-4 – Bikeways, Figure C-5 – Standard
Bikeway Cross Sections, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, Figure 5.13-5 – Proposed City of San
Jacinto General Plan Network, Figure 5.13-6 – General Plan Roadway Cross-Sections, Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by Mi-
chael Baker International, June 25, 2019 & Striping and Striping Plans, prepared by Michael Baker International, May, 2019)
The 2011 Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Congestion Management Program
(CMP) designates certain roadways as CMP facilities. The CMP designates a minimum acceptable LOS
of E on CMP facilities. The nearest designated CMP routes are State Route 74 and State Route 79.
Ramona Expressway intersects with State Route 74 approximately three miles south of the project site.
East Main Street intersects with State Route 79 approximately one mile west of the project site. The
1CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3(c) provides that a lead agency “may elect to be governed by the provisions” of the section imme-
diately; otherwise, the section’s provisions apply July 1, 2020. Here, the City has not elected to be governed by Section 15064.3.
Accordingly, an analysis of vehicles miles traveled (VMT) is not necessary to determine whether a proposed project will have a sig-
nificant transportation impact.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 67 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Project is not expected to result in a significant contribution of traffic to these facilities. Project-related
traffic becomes more diffuse farther from the project site as it spreads through the transportation network.
The traffic impact analysis estimates that 22 percent of Project traffic would use East Main Street west
of Hewitt Street, 15 percent of the Project traffic would use Ramona Expressway to the northwest, and
20 percent of Project traffic would use Ramona Expressway south of East 7th Street. Due to the “local
serving” nature of this commercial center, most of the primary (new) trips will have origins and destina-
tions near the Project. Trips arriving on regional facilities like State Route 74 and State Route 79 would
be primarily pass-by trips destined to a nearby regional trip attractor (such as the Soboba Casino). Ac-
cordingly, only a minor amount Project-related “new” traffic would use State Route 74 and State Route
79. Due to the minor amount of new trips the Project would contribute to these roadways, Project impacts
are considered to be less than significant directly, indirectly or cumulatively.
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a design
feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous inter-
sections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equip-
ment)?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Circulation Element Table C-1 – Overview of Street Classi-
fications, Figure C-1 – Roadway Cross Sections, Figure C-2 – Roadway System, Figure C-4 – Bikeways, Figure C-5 – Standard
Bikeway Cross Sections, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, Figure 5.13-5 – Proposed City of San
Jacinto General Plan Network, Figure 5.13-6 – General Plan Roadway Cross-Sections, Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by Mi-
chael Baker International, June 25, 2019 & Striping and Striping Plans, prepared by Michael Baker International, May, 2019)
The project driveways are located along East Main Street, Ramona Expressway and Donna Way which
do not have sharp curves in the vicinity of the access points. The sight distance appears adequate to
observe oncoming vehicles and do not appear to pose a hazardous condition. The proposed traffic signal
at Ramona Expressway and Donna Way will adhere to all applicable design guidelines and will provide
safer access to and from the site. No incompatible uses are proposed that would conflict with existing
traffic. The Project would have a less-than-significant impact directly, indirectly and cumulatively on traffic
hazards.
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, Circulation Element Table C-1 – Overview of Street Classi-
fications, Figure C-1 – Roadway Cross Sections, Figure C-2 – Roadway System, Figure C-4 – Bikeways, Figure C-5 – Standard
Bikeway Cross Sections, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012, Figure 5.13-5 – Proposed City of San
Jacinto General Plan Network, Figure 5.13-6 – General Plan Roadway Cross-Sections, Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by Mi-
chael Baker International, June 25, 2019 & Striping and Striping Plans, prepared by Michael Baker International, May, 2019)
The proposed development has three points of access, one on East Main Street, one on Ramona Ex-
pressway, and one on Donna Way. In the event that one driveway is blocked, another driveway can be
accessed for emergency vehicles. These access points have been reviewed by the City’s traffic engi-
neer and the City’s police and fire departments to ensure the design complies with all applicable public
safety codes. Through project design and code enforcement, adequate emergency access would be
provided, and the Project would result in a less-than-significant impact, directly, indirectly and cumu-
latively on emergency access.
XVIII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES – Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined
in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape
that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred
place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Regis-
ter of Historical Resources, or in a local register
of historical resources as defined in Public Re-
sources Code section 5020.1(k), or
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012; Resource Management Element Figure RM-4 – Cultural
Resources; General Plan FEIR; Figure 5.5-1 – Existing Cultural Resources; General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012; General
Plan EIR Figure 5.1-1 – Existing Cultural Resources; Development Code Chapter 17.500 – Archaeological and Paleontological
Protection; Chapter 17.510 – Historic Preservation; & Cultural and Paleontological Resources Inventory, Prepared by Natural
Investigations Company, October 19, 2017)
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 68 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
See responses V a - c above. Natural Investigations contacted the Native American Heritage
Commission (NAHC), requesting a search of their Sacred Lands File for traditional cultural resources
within or near the Project area. The reply from the NAHC, dated September 25, 2017, states that the
search failed to indicate the presence of sacred lands in the immediate vicinity of the Project area, but
that the area is considered sensitive for cultural resources.
In addition, the City conducted AB 52 Consultations with the tribes noted in Appendix A of this Initial
Study. No cultural resources have been previously recorded on the project site, and no resources were
identified during the survey of the project site. However, as there is always a chance that unanticipated
cultural resources, archaeological resources, or even human remains could be encountered during
ground-disturbing activities mitigation measures MM CR 1 through MM CR 3 have been applied to this
Project. Therefore, the Project will have a less than significant impact with mitigation, directly, indi-
rectly, or cumulatively, on any cultural resource as defined by Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k).
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence,
to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code section
5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdi-
vision (c) of Public Resources Code section
5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the signifi-
cance of the resource to a California Native Amer-
ican tribe.
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012; Resource Management Element Figure RM-4 – Cultural
Resources; General Plan FEIR; Figure 5.5-1 – Existing Cultural Resources; General Plan EIR Addendum August 2012; General
Plan EIR Figure 5.1-1 – Existing Cultural Resources; Development Code Chapter 17.500 – Archaeological and Paleontological
Protection; Chapter 17.510 – Historic Preservation; & Cultural and Paleontological Resources Inventory, Prepared by Natural
Investigations Company, October 19, 2017)
See response XVIII a) above, no significant resources have been identified on the Project site pursuant
to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1. However, implementation
of MM CR 1 to MM CR 3 will address significant resources that may be present on the site. Therefore,
the Project will have less than significant impact with mitigation, directly, indirectly, and cumulatively
on a Tribal Historical Resource.
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ̶ Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction
of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment
or storm water drainage, electric power, natural
gas, or telecommunications facilities, the con-
struction or relocation of which could cause sig-
nificant environmental effects?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012 & Sewer Study, prepared by Dexter Wilson Engineering, February 6, 2019)
Water
Water will be provided by EMWD. EMWD has indicated the ability to serve the Project. No new or ex-
panded water supply facilities are needed. EMWD has found that its water supplies will be sufficient to
meet the District’s water demand during normal, single dry, and multiple dry years through 2040. The
Project is consistent with the City of San Jacinto General Plan designation of the project site. Because
the General Plan was used to forecast future water demand, the proposed development has already
been factored into the EMWD’s overall water demand.
Wastewater
Sewer service to the Project would be provided by the City of San Jacinto. The City operates and main-
tains local collector sewers in the area that convey flow to EMWD truck sewers and interceptors. EMWD
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 69 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
is responsible for treatment and disposal of sewage conveyed to their system from the City of San
Jacinto. The Project would connect to an 8-inch sewer line along the western boundary of the project
site. This 8-inch sewer line conveys flow to an 8-inch sewer line in Main Street that conveys flow westerly.
This line leaves Main Street and increases to 12-inch and then to 15-inch prior to connecting to an EMWD
36-inch line in Palm Avenue. Based on sewer flow metering that was performed in the existing system
downstream of the Project, the existing sewer system is flowing within its design capacity at peak flows.
With the addition of flows from the Luiseno Village Project, the existing sewer lines are still anticipated
to be operating within their design capacity at peak flows.
Wastewater from the Project would be conveyed to EMWD’s San Jacinto Valley Regional Water Recla-
mation Facility for treatment. As of 2016, the reclamation facility has a capacity of 14 MGD with typical
daily flows of 7 MGD. The reclamation facility has an ultimate design capacity of 27 MGD. The Project
would not exceed current capacity of the collection or treatment system. The Project would have a less
than significant impact on wastewater infrastructure.
Storm water
Pursuant to NPDES regulations, the City will require that the Project comply with existing Santa Ana
WQCB and City stormwater controls, including compliance with NPDES construction and operation
measures to prevent erosion, siltation, and transport of urban pollutants.
In addition, the City of San Jacinto is a Co-Permittee in, and is required to comply with, the Riverside
County municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) permit (Waste Discharge Requirements for Riv-
erside County - Order No. 2010-0033, NPDES No. CAS618033) adopted by the Regional Board on
January 29, 2010. In conformance with this MS4 permit the Project is required to implement structural
and non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) to retain and treat pollutants of concern (in dry-
weather runoff and first-flush stormwater runoff, during and post-construction.
Consistent with the MS4 permit, the Preliminary WQMP for the Project incorporates infiltration chambers
that will be installed below the parking areas to allow for percolation of stormwater on site. Stormwater
will be filtered through the underground chambers, removing contaminants and reducing discharge to a
level equal to or below the pre-development discharge. Stormwater that is not infiltrated on site would
discharge to an existing concrete swale on the west side of the project site that drains to East Main Street
and the City of San Jacinto’s storm sewer system and not to the nearby San Jacinto River and Conserved
lands. Runoff from the proposed car wash will drain to the sanitary sewer.
The Project will not impact the existing stormwater management systems significantly. The Project will
not result in an increase in the volume of stormwater discharged to the City’s drainage system.
Electric Power
The proposed development would connect to existing utility lines along East Main Street, Ramona Ex-
pressway and Donna Way. Electric power is provided to the site by Southern California Edison (SCE).
SCE has committed to providing service to the planned uses of the General Plan, and this Project is
consistent with the City’s General Plan. The Project will connect to an existing distribution line along
East Main Street. The Project will not require or result in the construction of expanded electric power
which could cause significant environmental effects.
Natural Gas
Natural gas is provided to the site by Southern California Gas Company (SCG). The Project will connect
to an existing distribution line in either East Main Street or Ramona Expressway. SCG has committed
to providing service to the planned uses of the General Plan 2035, and this Project is consistent with the
City’s General Plan 2035. The Project will not require or result in the relocation or construction of new
or expanded natural gas facilities power which could cause significant environmental effects.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 70 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Telecommunication Facilities
No cellular utilities are present on the site. No expanded telecommunication facilities would be needed
to serve the project.
Summary
The Project will have a less-than-significant impact, directly, indirectly, or cumulatively, on the
relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage,
electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could
cause significant environmental effects.
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve
the project and reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry and multiple dry
years?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012)
Senate Bill (SB) 610 (Chapter 643, Statutes of 2001; Water Code Sections 10910–10915) made changes
to the Urban Water Management Planning Act to require additional information in UWMPs if groundwater
is identified as a source available to the supplier. The information required includes a copy of any ground-
water management plan adopted by the supplier, a copy of the adjudication order or decree for adjudi-
cated basins, and if non-adjudicated, whether the basin has been identified as being over drafted or
projected to be over drafted in the most current DWR publication on that basin. If the basin is in overdraft,
that plan must include current efforts to eliminate any long-term overdraft. A key provision in SB 610
requires that large development projects supplied with water from a public water system and subject to
CEQA be provided a specified water supply assessment, except as specified in the law. Large develop-
ment projects include those with 500 or more residential units, 500,000 square feet of retail commercial
space, or 250,000 square feet of office commercial space. These assessments, prepared by “public
water systems” responsible for service, address whether there are adequate existing or projected water
supplies available to serve proposed projects, in addition to urban and agricultural demands and other
anticipated development in the service area in which the project is located.
SB 221 (Chapter 642, Statutes of 2001; Government Code Section 66473.7) prohibits approval of sub-
divisions consisting of more than 500 dwelling units unless there is verification of sufficient water supplies
for the project from the applicable water supplier(s). This requirement also applies to approvals that
would increase the number of service connections by 10% or more for public water systems with less
than 500 service connections. The law defines criteria for determining “sufficient water supply” such as
using normal, single-dry, and multiple-dry year hydrology and identifying the amount of water that the
supplier can reasonably rely on to meet existing and future planned uses. Rights to extract additional
groundwater, if used for the project, must be substantiated.
The Project proposes retail commercial buildings totaling 34,096-square-feet and as such is not required
to get a water supply assessment from EMWD, the water purveyor.
EMWD has found that its water supplies will be sufficient to meet the District’s water demand during
normal, single dry, and multiple dry years through 2040. The Project is consistent with the City of San
Jacinto General Plan designation of the project site. Because the General Plan was used to forecast
future water demand, the proposed development has already been factored into the EMWD’s overall
water demand.
EMWD has sufficient water supply to serve the Project, and Project-related impacts on water supply
would be less than significant directly, indirectly and cumulatively.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 71 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may serve
the project that it has adequate capacity to serve
the project's projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012)
As noted in XIX a) above, the Project will not generate enough wastewater to exceed current capacity of
the wastewater system. San Jacinto Municipal Utilities and EMWD implement all requirements of the
Regional Water Quality Control Board pertaining to water quality and wastewater discharge requirement.
The Project will have a less-than-significant impact, directly, indirectly and cumulatively on wastewater
treatment.
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment
of solid waste reduction goals?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012 & Municipal Code Chapter 8.34 – Construction and Demolition Waste Management)
CR&R Waste and Recycling Services transports solid waste to the Lamb Canyon landfill. The Lamb
Canyon landfill is expected to meet capacity in 2021 at which time waste can be taken to the El Sobrante
or Badlands landfills. With the implementation of the City’s and CR&R’s recycling programs the City
continues to divert waste from the landfill. The California Integrated Waste Management Act (CIWMA)
of 1989 mandates that all cities and counties in California reduce solid waste disposed at landfills gen-
erated within their jurisdictions by 50% and has a long-term compliance goal of 70%. Construction waste
associated with the proposed Project will be recycled to the extent practicable with the remainder sent
to a landfill. Pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 8.34 – Construction Demolition Waste Management,
50% of the construction debris must be diverted. Therefore, landfill capacity is available to accommodate
this Project and the Project will have a less-than-significant impact, directly, indirectly and cumulatively
to landfills.
e) Comply with federal, state, and local
statutes and regulations related to solid
waste?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012, General Plan EIR, General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012 & Municipal Code Chapter 8.34 – Construction and Demolition Waste Management)
Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste generation, transport, and dis-
posal are intended to assure adequate landfill capacity through mandatory reductions in solid waste
quantities (for example, through recycling and composting of green waste) and the safe and efficient
transportation of solid waste. The Project will comply with all regulatory requirements regarding solid
waste including AB 939 and AB 341. AB 939, which is administered by the California Department of
Resources Recycling and Recovery required local governments to achieve a landfill diversion rate of at
least 50 percent by January 1, 2000, through source reduction, recycling, and composting activities.
Moreover, AB 341 increases the minimum solid waste diversion rate to 75 percent by 2020. Such regu-
lations will be applicable to this Project and compliance is mandatory. Further, mandates set forth by the
CALGreen Code aim to reduce solid waste generation and promote recycling and diversion design and
activities, to which this Project is required to comply. There will be a less-than-significant impact, di-
rectly, indirectly or cumulatively regarding compliance with Federal, State, and local statutes and regu-
lations related to solid waste.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 72 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XX. WILDFIRE – If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high
fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency re-
sponse plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012; General Plan EIR; & General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012)
The project site is not within or near a Very High Fire Hazards Zone. The nearest Very High Fire Hazards
Area is located approximately 1/3 mile east across the San Jacinto River. The site is separated from this
area by the San Jacinto River and its associated levees, a EMWD property that is maintained free of
vegetation, and by Ramona Expressway. This separation and the accessibility of the area (mostly level
terrain and roadways) assists in reducing fire risk while facilitating access for firefighting efforts.
As stated in response Section IX f) above, the City’s Emergency Operation Plan describes the City’s
process for responding to emergencies or disasters. In addition, the City, along with most other jurisdic-
tions in Riverside County, joined with the County of Riverside to submit a Multi-Jurisdictional LHMP
providing a framework for emergency response. The Project provides adequate access for emergency
vehicles, including adequate street widths and vertical clearance. Implementation of federal, state, and
local laws and regulations in the construction of this Project would result in less than significant im-
pacts, directly, indirectly, or cumulatively, to adopted emergency response or evacuation plans.
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose pro-
ject occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a
wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012; General Plan EIR; & General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012)
In addition to response Section IX g) above, the Project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard
Classification area with the County of Riverside or a High Fire Hazard Zone Area in the City’s General
Plan (Figure 5.7-1 – Fire Hazard). As well, the site is relatively flat. Therefore, the Project will not
exacerbate wildfire risks and will have no impact, directly, indirectly, or cumulatively, to the exposure of
pollutant concentration from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire.
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associ-
ated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks,
emergency water sources, power lines or other
utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk, or that may
result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the en-
vironment?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012; General Plan EIR; & General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012)
The Project will not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure that would exac-
erbate fire risk, or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment and as such will
have a no impact, directly, indirectly, or cumulatively.
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, in-
cluding downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope in-
stability, or drainage changes?
Response: (Source: General Plan as amended October 19, 2012; General Plan EIR; & General Plan EIR Addendum August
2012)
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 73 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The site is relatively flat and is not located near any slopes that could subject to instability after a fire.
Therefore, the Project will have a less no impact, directly, indirectly or cumulatively, as it is will not
expose people or structures to significant risk from flooding or landslides as a result of a wildfire.
II. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially re-
duce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, substantially reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California his-
tory or prehistory?
As described in Section IV. Biological Resources, no sensitive natural community exists on the site. The
only habitat found on the project site is ruderal grasslands isolated by surrounding development. No
special-status species or special-status habitats occur on the project site. Implementation of identified
mitigation measures (pre-construction surveys, MSHCP BMPs) would ensure that any impacts to spe-
cial-status species would be less than significant.
As described in Section V. Cultural Resources, no built environment resources were identified or rec-
orded during the survey. Thus, the Project does not have the potential to cause a significant impact on
any resource that qualifies as a historical resource. In addition, no archaeological resources were iden-
tified or recorded during the field survey. The potential for the discovery of buried archaeological materi-
als within the alluvial sediments underlying the project area is low. Implementation of identified mitigation
measures (unanticipated discovery measures) would ensure that any impacts to archaeological re-
sources would be less than significant.
As described in Section VII. Geology and Soils, the project site is in an area mapped as having high
sensitivity for paleontological resources. Excavation and grading on the site at depths at or below 4 feet
has the potential to impact paleontological resources. Implementation of identified mitigation measures
(paleontological monitoring) would ensure that any impacts to archaeological resources would be less
than significant.
The Project would not result in significant impacts to other environmental resource categories. Based on
the lack of known resources on the site and the inclusion of mitigation measures to reduce impact, the
Project would result in a less-than-significant impact with mitigation.
b) Does the project have impacts that are individu-
ally limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cu-
mulatively considerable" means that the incre-
mental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past pro-
jects, the effects of other current project, and the
effects of probable future projects.)
The evaluation of Project impacts in this document has been made in the context of cumulative impacts
and resource trends. Air quality and GHG emissions have been evaluated according to SCAQMD thresh-
olds intended to protect air quality and climate from the cumulative impact of development in the region.
Impacts to biological resources have been addressed in the context of the MSHCP, which addresses the
conservation needs of listed species while providing for regional development. Water quality impacts
have been evaluated for consistency with the regional MS4 and statewide NPDES permits, which ad-
dress cumulative effects on water quality. Traffic impacts have been assessed in accordance with the
City’s LOS standards to ensure that cumulative impacts to the local roadway network are addressed.
Likewise, Project impacts in all other environmental resource categories have been made in the context
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 74 City of San Jacinto
ISSUES (AND SUPPORTING
INFORMATION SOURCES):
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with Mitiga-
tion Incorpo-
rated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
of how the Project would contribute to resource trends that are shaped by existing and future develop-
ment patterns. With mitigation, these potential impacts do not have the potential to be cumulatively con-
siderable. The Project would result in a less-than-significant cumulative impact with mitigation.
c) Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
A significant impact to humans may occur if the Project has the potential to result in significant environ-
mental impacts. Based on the preceding environmental analysis, the Project would not have significant
environmental effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Any potentially significant impacts
would be reduced to less-than-significant levels through the implementation of the applicable mitiga-
tion measures identified within this document.
Note: Authority cited: Public Resources Code sections 21083, 21083.05, 21083.09.
Reference: Gov. Code section 65088.4; Public Resources Code sections 21073, 21074, 21080(c), 21080.1, 21080.3, 21080.3.1,
21080.3.2, 21082.3, 21083, 21083.3, 21083.5, 21084.2, 21084.3, 21093, 21094, 21095 and 21151; Sundstrom v. County of Mendo-
cino (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296; Leonoff v. Monterey Board of Supervisors (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 1337; Eureka Citizens for Respon-
sible Govt. v. City of Eureka (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 357; Protect the Historic Amador Waterways v. Amador Water Agency (2004)
116 Cal.App.4th 1099, 1109; San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City and County of San Francisco (2002) 102
Cal.App.4th 656.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center
Page 75 City of San Jacinto
Supporting Information Sources
Beck, Carly, 2019. Email from Carly Beck, Environmental Scientist, California Department of Fish
and Wildlife to Travis Randel, Planning and Community Development Director, City of San
Jacinto, July 18, 2019.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 2019. Custom Soil Resource Report for West-
ern Riverside Area, California. April 24, 2019.
4.1.j
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-09, 10, 11.)4.1.c
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-05))4.1.a
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11, VAR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Initial Study – Luiseño Village Retail Center / Page 1 City of San Jacinto APPENDIX A – AB 52 CONSULTATION LOG 4.1.jPacket Pg. 159Attachment: 10 - Initial Study (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, VAR-17-05, and MUP-17-4.1.cPacket Pg. 242Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.aPacket Pg. 266Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.aPacket Pg. 221Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.aPacket Pg. 263Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
MITIGATION MONITORING or REPORTING PROGRAM (MMRP)
FOR LUISEÑO VILLAGE RETAIL CENTER (DRAFT)
1. Project Case Number(s):
SPDR-17-17 – Site Plan & Design Review Case
2. Project Title: Luiseño Village Retail Center (Project)
3. Lead Agency: Kevin White, Senior Planner
City of San Jacinto
Planning Department
595 S. San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
kwhite@sanjacintoca.gov
4. Project Sponsor:
Applicant/Developer/Property Owner
Ruben De Los Santos
Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians
P.O. Box 487
San Jacinto, CA 92581
(951) 654-5544
RDELOSSANTOS@soboba-nsn.gov
5. Project Location: Southwest corner of Main Street and Ramona Expressway in the City of San Jacinto. The Project Site is located
within an unsectioned area of the Rancho San Jacinto Viejo land grant, Township 4 South, Range 1 West (San Bernardino base line and
meridian) as shown on the San Jacinto, California 7.5-minute U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle. The project site is comprised of
4 parcels with 7 Tax Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs): 433-160-024, 027, 028, 029, 032, 033, and 034.
4.1.k
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: 11 - Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17,4.1.c
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Luiseño Village Retail Center Page 2 City of San Jacinto
THE FOLLOWING REPRESENTS THE CITY’S MITIGATION MONITORING OR REPORTING PROGRAM FOR
THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE ABOVE PROJECT)
LUISENO VILAGE RETAIL CENTER
Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Monitoring Timing
or Frequency
Type of
Verification
Verification of
Compliance
Initials Date
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
MM BIO 1 If construction occurs during the breeding
season (February 1 to August 31), a
burrowing owl breeding bird survey following
the recommended guidelines of the MSHCP
will be required within 30 days prior to
construction to determine if nesting is
occurring on site.
If burrowing owl have colonized the project
site, the Applicant will prepare a Burrowing
Owl Protection and Relocation Plan for
approval by RCA and CDFW.
Occupied nests will not be disturbed during
the nesting season (February 1 through
August 31) unless a qualified biologist
verifies through non-invasive methods that
either (a) the adult birds have not begun
egg-laying and incubation; or (b) the
juveniles from the occupied nests are
foraging independently and are capable of
independent survival.
If the biologist is not able to verify one of the
above conditions, then no disturbance shall
occur during the breeding season within a
distance determined by the qualified
biologist for each nest or nesting site. For
the burrowing owl, the recommended
distance is a minimum of 160 feet.
Relocation of burrowing owl is subject to the
above conditions and prior coordination with
RCA, CDFW and the United States Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS).
Developer
Prior To All
Demolition,
Earthmoving, and/or
Grading
Planning shall
ensure that survey
has been received
before approving
grading plan
REMARKS:
4.1.k
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: 11 - Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17,4.1.c
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Luiseño Village Retail Center Page 3 City of San Jacinto
LUISENO VILAGE RETAIL CENTER
Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Monitoring Timing
or Frequency
Type of
Verification
Verification of
Compliance
Initials Date
MM BIO 2 A breeding bird survey will be required to
determine if nesting is occurring no more
than five days prior to ground disturbing
activities. Occupied nests will not be
disturbed during the nesting season
(February 1 through August 31) unless a
qualified biologist verifies through non-
invasive methods that either (a) the adult
birds have not begun egg-laying and
incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the
occupied nests are foraging independently
and are capable of independent survival.
If the biologist is not able to verify one of the
above conditions, then no disturbance shall
occur during the breeding season within a
distance determined by the qualified
biologist for each nest or nesting site.
Developer
Prior To All
Demolition,
Earthmoving, and/or
Grading
Planning shall
ensure that survey
has been received
before approving
grading plan
REMARKS:
MM BIO 3 A condition shall be placed on grading
permits requiring a qualified biologist to
conduct a training session for project
personnel prior to grading. The training shall
include a description of the species of
concern and its habitats, the general
provisions of the Endangered Species Act
(Act) and the MSHCP, the need to adhere to
the provisions of the Act and the MSHCP,
the penalties associated with violating the
provisions of the Act, the general measures
that are being implemented to conserve the
species of concern as they relate to the
project, and the access routes to and project
site boundaries within which the project
activities must be accomplished.
Water pollution and erosion control plans
shall be developed and implemented in
accordance with RWQCB requirements.
Developer
Prior To All
Demolition,
Earthmoving, and/or
Grading
Planning shall verify
on Plan Check set
of plans
City Engineer during
inspections
4.1.k
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: 11 - Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17,4.1.c
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Luiseño Village Retail Center Page 4 City of San Jacinto
LUISENO VILAGE RETAIL CENTER
Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Monitoring Timing
or Frequency
Type of
Verification
Verification of
Compliance
Initials Date
The footprint of disturbance shall be
minimized to the maximum extent feasible.
Access to sites shall be via pre-existing
access routes to the greatest extent
possible.
Equipment storage, fueling, and staging
areas shall be located on upland sites with
minimal risks of direct drainage into riparian
areas or other sensitive habitats. These
designated areas shall be located in such a
manner as to prevent any runoff from
entering sensitive habitat. Necessary
precautions shall be taken to prevent the
release of cement or other toxic substances
into surface waters. Project related spills of
hazardous materials shall be reported to
appropriate entities including but not limited
to applicable jurisdictional city, FWS, and
CDFG, RWQCB and shall be cleaned up
immediately and contaminated soils
removed to approved disposal areas.
The removal of native vegetation shall be
avoided and minimized to the maximum
extent practicable. Temporary impacts shall
be returned to pre-existing contours and
revegetated with appropriate native species.
Exotic species that prey upon or displace
target species of concern should be
permanently removed from the site to the
extent feasible.
To avoid attracting predators of the species
of concern, the project site shall be kept as
clean of debris as possible. All food related
trash items shall be enclosed in sealed
containers and regularly removed from the
site(s).
4.1.k
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: 11 - Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17,4.1.c
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Luiseño Village Retail Center Page 5 City of San Jacinto
LUISENO VILAGE RETAIL CENTER
Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Monitoring Timing
or Frequency
Type of
Verification
Verification of
Compliance
Initials Date
Construction employees shall strictly limit
their activities, vehicles, equipment, and
construction materials to the proposed
project footprint and designated staging
areas and routes of travel. The construction
area(s) shall be the minimal area necessary
to complete the project and shall be
specified in the construction plans.
Construction limits will be fenced with
orange snow screen. Exclusion fencing
should be maintained until the completion of
all construction activities. Employees shall
be instructed that their activities are
restricted to the construction areas.
The Permittee (City of San Jacinto) shall
have the right to access and inspect any
sites of approved projects including any
restoration/enhancement area for
compliance with project approval conditions
including these BMPs.
REMARKS:
MM BIO 4 The following measures apply to the
construction of roadway improvements with the
rights-of-way of Ramona Expressway and East
Main Street that are completed as part of the
Project.
Plans for water pollution and erosion control
will be prepared for work involving the
movement of earth in excess of 50 cubic
yards. The plans will describe sediment and
hazardous materials control, dewatering or
diversion structures, fueling and equipment
management practices, use of plant material
for erosion control. Plans will be reviewed
and approved by the City prior to
construction.
Developer
Prior To All
Demolition,
Earthmoving, and/or
Grading
Planning shall verify
on Plan Check set
of plans
City Engineer during
inspections
4.1.k
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: 11 - Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17,4.1.c
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Luiseño Village Retail Center Page 6 City of San Jacinto
LUISENO VILAGE RETAIL CENTER
Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Monitoring Timing
or Frequency
Type of
Verification
Verification of
Compliance
Initials Date
Timing of construction activities will consider
seasonal requirements for breeding birds
and migratory non-resident species. Habitat
clearing will be avoided during species
active breeding season defined as March 1
to June 30.
Sediment and erosion control measures will
be implemented until such time soils are
determined to be successfully stabilized.
Silt fencing or other sediment trapping
materials will be installed at the downstream
end of construction activities to minimize the
transport of sediments off-site.
The footprint of disturbance will be
minimized to the maximum extent Feasible.
Access to sites will occur on pre-existing
access routes to the greatest extent
possible.
Equipment storage, fueling and staging
areas will be sited on non-sensitive upland
wildlife habitat types with minimal risk of
direct discharge into riparian areas or other
sensitive wildlife habitat types.
Exotic species removed during construction
will be properly handled to prevent sprouting
or regrowth.
Training of construction personnel will be
provided.
Ongoing monitoring and reporting will occur
for the duration of the construction activity to
ensure implementation of best management
practices.
Active construction areas shall be watered
regularly to control dust and minimize
impacts to adjacent vegetation.
4.1.k
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: 11 - Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17,4.1.c
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Luiseño Village Retail Center Page 7 City of San Jacinto
LUISENO VILAGE RETAIL CENTER
Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Monitoring Timing
or Frequency
Type of
Verification
Verification of
Compliance
Initials Date
All equipment maintenance, staging, and
dispensing of fuel, oil, coolant, or any other
toxic substances shall occur only in
designated areas within the proposed
grading limits of the project site. These
designated areas shall be clearly marked
and located in such a manner as to contain
run-off.
Waste, dirt, rubble, or trash shal l not be
deposited in the Conservation Area or on
native habitat.
REMARKS:
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES
MM CR 1 Should cultural/archaeological resources be
encountered during ground disturbing activities
for the project, work must be halted in the area
within 50 feet of the find and a qualified
archaeologist notified immediately to assess
the significance of the find. Construction
activities could continue in other areas. If the
discovery proves to be significant, additional
work, such as data recovery excavation, may
be warranted and would be discussed in
consultation with the property owner, the City
of San Jacinto, or any other relevant regulatory
agency, as appropriate.
Developer Monitor during all
earthmoving activity
Advise the City
immediately if work
stops for a find
REMARKS:
MM CR 2 In the event of the discovery of human remains,
the Riverside County coroner shall be
immediately notified. If human remains of
Native American origin are discovered during
ground disturbing activities, the applicant shall
comply with the State law relating to the
disposition of Native American burials that fall
within the jurisdiction of the NAHC (PRC
Section 5097). According to California Health
and Safety Code, six or more human burials at
one location constitute a cemetery (Section
8100), and disturbance of Native American
Developer,
Archaeologist and
Tribal Monitors
Monitor During All
Earthmoving Activity
Once City is notified
Planning shall follow
the process
4.1.k
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: 11 - Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17,4.1.c
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Luiseño Village Retail Center Page 8 City of San Jacinto
LUISENO VILAGE RETAIL CENTER
Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Monitoring Timing
or Frequency
Type of
Verification
Verification of
Compliance
Initials Date
cemeteries is a felony (Section 7052). Section
7050.5 requires that excavation be stopped
near discovered human remains until the
coroner can determine whether the remains
are those of a Native American. If the remains
are determined to be Native American, the
California Native American Heritage
Commission and the Soboba Band of Luiseño
Indians shall be notified, and appropriate
measures provided by State law shall be
implemented to determine the most likely living
descendant(s). Disposition of the remains
shall be overseen by the most likely living
descendants to determine the most
appropriate means of treating the human
remains and any associated grave artifacts.
REMARKS:
VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
MM GEO 1 The Soil and Foundation Report (Soils
Southwest, 2017) provides foundation
recommendations to minimize seismic-
induced settlement hazards. These include
using conventional checkered/waffle type rigid
footings for exterior load bearing walls along
with interior grade beams, or using a rigid mat
foundation. Additional recommendations
address concrete slab construction and curing,
excavation and fill, pavement and utility
trenches. The recommendations identified in
the Soil and Foundation Report, or similar
measures approved by a registered civil
engineer, shall be incorporated into the
construction plans. Project plans will be
reviewed during the plan check process to
confirm geotechnical design measures are
incorporated to address the potential for
seismic-induced settlement. These measures
shall be incorporated into final construction
plans prior to issuance of building permits.
Developer and
Geotechnical
Engineer
Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Engineering shall
verify on Plan
Check set of plans
REMARKS:
4.1.k
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: 11 - Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17,4.1.c
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Luiseño Village Retail Center Page 9 City of San Jacinto
LUISENO VILAGE RETAIL CENTER
Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Monitoring Timing
or Frequency
Type of
Verification
Verification of
Compliance
Initials Date
MM GEO 2 All earthmoving during project implementation
at or below 4 feet requires full-time
paleontological monitoring, as follows:
A qualified paleontologist (graduate degree
and more than one year of professional
experience as a principal investigator) will
be retained to provide paleontological
services. The principal paleontologist will be
responsible to implement and oversee
monitoring and to maintain professional
standards of work. The principal
paleontologist will report all mitigation and
monitoring activities, or related actions of the
paleontological resources team to the City,
as appropriate, including discussing a
reduction in monitoring from full- to part-time
after monitoring is initiated and no fossils
have been identified.
A qualified paleontological monitor will
perform monitoring of construction grading
and excavations that take place in the older
Pleistocene sediments at depths of 4 feet or
more. The monitor will have authority to
divert grading away from exposed fossils
temporarily in order to recover the fossil
specimens. Cooperation and assistance
from on-site personnel will greatly assist
timely resumption of work in the area of the
fossil discovery.
Discovery of fossil producing localities
requires documentation including measured
stratigraphic columns and geologic samples
for analysis. Any fossils recovered that meet
significance criteria will be prepar ed,
identified, and cataloged before donation to
an appropriate repository. The Western
Science Center in Hemet, California is
recommended as an appropriate repository.
Developer and
Paleontologist
Monitor During All
Earthmoving Activity
Once City is notified
Planning shall follow
the process
4.1.k
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: 11 - Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17,4.1.c
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Luiseño Village Retail Center Page 10 City of San Jacinto
LUISENO VILAGE RETAIL CENTER
Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Monitoring Timing
or Frequency
Type of
Verification
Verification of
Compliance
Initials Date
The principal paleontologist retained will
prepare a final report. The report will include a
list of specimens recovered, documentation of
each locality, interpretation of fossils
recovered, and will include any specialists’
reports as appendices.
REMARKS:
XIII. NOISE
MM NOI 1 Construction shall occur during the permissible
hours as defined in Section 8.40.090.
Developer
Maintain time
frames during
Construction
The City will verify
during Inspections &
through Code
Enforcement
Complaints
REMARKS:
MM NOI 2 During construction, the contactor shall ensure
all construction equipment is equipped with
appropriate noise attenuating devices. Developer During
Construction
Should complaints
arise the City will
ask for verification
of equipment
REMARKS:
MM NOI 3 The contractor shall locate equipment staging
areas that will create the greatest distance
between construction-related noise/vibration
sources and sensitive receptors nearest the
project site during all project construction.
Developer During Construction The City will verify
during Inspections
REMARKS:
MM NOI 4 Idling equipment shall be turned off when not
in use.
Developer During
Construction
Should complaints
arise the City will
ask for verification
REMARKS:
MM NOI 5 Solid Waste and recycling collection shall only
occur during daytime hours (7:00 a.m. and
7:00 p.m.).
Property owner and
Retail Operators
Throughout the Life
of the Project
Upon a complaint
Code Enforcement
REMARKS:
MM NOI 6 Truck deliveries shall only occur during
daytime hours (7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.).
Property owner and
Retail Operators
Throughout the
Life of the Project
Upon a complaint
Code Enforcement
REMARKS:
MM NOI 7 All HVAC units on the roofs of the retail
buildings on Parcels 1 and 2 shall be shielded
to maintain the nighttime standard of 45 dBA at
Developer Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Planning shall verify
on Plan Check set
of plans
4.1.k
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: 11 - Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17,4.1.c
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Luiseño Village Retail Center Page 11 City of San Jacinto
LUISENO VILAGE RETAIL CENTER
Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Monitoring Timing
or Frequency
Type of
Verification
Verification of
Compliance
Initials Date
the adjacent residential property line. A
parapet or acoustic screen shall be provided
that extends two feet in height above the top of
the HVAC units. A noise control analysis of the
HVAC plans and specifications shall be
provided prior to issuance of building permits
to ensure that the HVAC units would not
exceed the 45 dBA standard at the adjacent
residential property line.
REMARKS:
TRANSPORTATION
MM TRAF 1 Main Street/Hewitt Street: The project
applicant shall make a fair share contribution
to the construction of a signal at this location.
Developer Prior to the First
Building Occupancy
Engineering &
Planning shall verify
that payment has
been made prior to
release of building
permits
REMARKS:
MM TRAF 2 Ramona Expressway/Main Street-Lake Park
Drive: The project applicant shall restripe the
eastbound approach to include one left turn
lane, one through lane, and one shared
through/right turn lane.
Developer Prior to Building
Permit Issuance
Engineering shall
verify on Street
Improvement plans
REMARKS:
4.1.k
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: 11 - Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program (Luiseno Village ZC-17-05, SPDR-17-17,4.1.c
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: 3 - PC Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09,10,11,4.1.a
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 1 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Approval Date: October 1, 2019
Effective Date: October 15, 2019
Expiration Date: October 15, 2019
PROJECT LOCATION: Southwest corner of Main Street and Ramona Expressway in the City of San Jacinto.
(APNs): 433-160-024, 027, 028, 029, 032, 033, and 034)
APPLICANT: Soboba Band of Luiseno Village
23906 Soboba Road
San Jacinto, CA 92583
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO BY: _____________________________________________________________
Applicant Date
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
A proposal of the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians to construct and operate a commercial shopping center that includes a service
station with 24 fuel pumps, a 3,048 square foot convenience store with alcohol sales, and a 1,105 square foot car wash; a 14,583
square foot multi-tenant retail building; a 9,360-square-foot multi-tenant retail building; a fast-food restaurant with drive-through
service totaling 2,800 square feet; a fast-food restaurant with drive-through service totaling 3,200 square feet.
General Requirements & Information – SPDR 17-17, CUP 17-09, MUP 17-09, MUP 17-10
A) The developer/applicant or successor in interest agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City, its officials, offi cers,
agents, and employees, from any and all liability, claims, actions or proceedings that may be brought arising out of its approval
of this permit, and any approvals associated with the Project, including, without limitation, any CEQA review or approval, except
to the extent caused by the negligence of the City.
B) The approval of this Project, a commercial center, shall comply with all required standards of the Development Code.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 2 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
C) The developer/applicant or successor in interest is advised that the businesses or uses which this Project is granted cannot be
legally conducted on the subject property until all conditions of approval of this case (SPDR 17-17) have been met to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department.
D) The effective date of issuance of this Project is October 15, 2019. The approval will lapse if improvements have not commenced
within two (2) years from the date upon which the approval was granted. Unless a time extension is approved by the City’s
applicable review authority. Applications for time extensions must be received prior to the expiration date.
E) All cases associated with the Project, SPDR-17-17, CUP-17-09, MUP-17-09, MUP-17-10, MUP-17-10, and VAR-17-05, and shall
have the same effective date and expiration date. Therefore, these cases will become null and void, if the project has not been
vested, on or before October 15, 2021 (two calendar years from the effective date), unless a time extension is approved by the City’s
applicable review authority. Applications for time extensions must be received prior to the expiration date.
F) All storage and display of merchandise and supplies must be conducted within a building.
G) The Project shall fully and continually comply with all applicable conditions of approval, State, Federal and local laws in effect
at the time the permit is approved and exercised, and which may become effective and applicable thereafter. Failure to do so
will be grounds for Code Enforcement actions, revocation, or further legal action.
H) All plans submitted to the City shall be in substantial conformance with the plans in this approval as conditioned. This condition
applies to site plans, grading plans, landscape plans, building plans, elevations, and all other illustrations, text, or plan s
submitted to the City in connection with the Project.
I) A copy of all pages of these conditions shall be included in the construction drawing packages for grading plans, building plans,
and landscape and irrigation plans.
J) This approval may be revoked if the Project is operated or maintained in violation of any law or in a manner that constitutes a
nuisance or adversely affects the public health, safety, or welfare.
K) The City shall have the right to annually inspect the site and facilities to ensure compliance with the conditions of approval and
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 3 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
to recover its actual costs related to such inspections from the property owner or tenant.
L) The required parking and loading features (e.g., landscaping, parking surfaces, striping, signs, etc.) shall be continuously
maintained in good condition by the person having control of the premises (e.g., lessee, owner, tenant, etc.) as follows:
• Landscaping shall be kept alive and continually maintained in compliance with Section 17.330.090 (Landscaping Standards
for Parking Areas) and Chapter 17.325 (Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation).
• Parking surfaces shall be kept free of holes and substantial deterioration.
• Striping shall be visible.
• Signs shall be kept in place, legible, and continually maintained.
• Parked vehicles shall not extend over a property line or into a public right-of-way.
• All parking and drive aisles shall be screened from the public right-of-way with a landscape hedge or decorative wall, as
reviewed and approved by the Planning and Community Development Director.
M) Fire Department apparatus access shall be provided to within 150 feet to of all portions of all buildings. Fire apparatus roads
shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet. Driveway loops, fire apparatus access lanes and entrance curb radius
should be designed to adequately allow access of emergency fire vehicles. Ref. CFC Sections 503.1.1 and 503.2.1 as amended
by the City of San Jacinto.
N) All required Fire Department vehicle access roads shall be maintained in a passable condition at all times for emergency Fire
Department use. Gates or other obstructions shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to construction.
O) For CFD Annexation - Developer will ensure that funds are available for maintenance of public improvements, in the event
that improvements are completed, and ready for City takeover, PRIOR to levy collection.
P) For CFD Annexation - The first installment of collected assessments is paid to the City in January of each year. In the
event that takeover is requested before the first installment is paid to the City, the Developer will either:
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 4 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Pay an advancement of funds for the months included from takeover to collection (amount to be set by cost estimate
at annexation) OR
Continue to maintain improvements until City has acquired enough funds to sustain maintenance or until first
assessment installment is received, whichever is first.
Q) For CFD Annexation - Upon acceptance and City take-over, developer will ensure that a minimum of one -year warranty
is in place for landscape, irrigation, basin integrity, inclusive pumps and mechanical equipment used for the maintenance
of the improvements taken over.
R) If not already completed, the developer/applicant or successor in interest shall submit a single check to the City, made
payable to the Riverside County Clerk, in the amount of $2,330.75, for the payment of State Fish and Game Fees
($2,280.75) and the County Recorder handling fee ($50.00) for filing of the Notice of Determination (NOD). In accordance
with Section 711.4 of the State Fish and Game Code, no project shall be operative, vested, or final until the filing fees
have been paid. The City will record the NOD and provide a copy of the NOD and receipt to the applicant.
S) Grading shall not be commenced, and no structures shall be altered, enlarged, erected, moved, demolished, or rebuilt
subject to the provisions of Chapter 17.630 – Site Plan and Design Review of the Development Code, except in
compliance with the approved Project and the conditions imposed on the review.
T) Grading and public improvements shall be installed in accordance with City standards and specifications. The tops of all
graded slopes shall be at the property line
U) The project’s grading shall be in a manner to perpetuate existing natural drainage patterns. Any deviation from this,
concentration or increase in runoff, must have approval from adjacent property owners, and the City Engineer. Drainage
easements shall be obtained from affected property owners. The applicant shall accept the offsite runoff and convey to
an acceptable outlet. Emergency escape paths shall be provided for all sump conditions.
V) Prior to issuance of any permit, the developer/property owner shall secure City’s and appropriate agency’s approval of
the improvement plans.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 5 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
W) Prior to commencement of any construction or installation of fencing in public ri ght-of-way, encroachment permit shall be
obtained from the City Engineer’s office.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 6 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Conditions of Approval
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
SPDR 17-17 - Project Description: A multi-tenant retail building totaling 14,583 square feet of specialty retail, with up to 10
individual tenant spaces ranging from 1,200 to 2,261 square feet each.
Prior to Any Earthmoving Activity For SPDR 17-17
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
1) Prior to grading permit issuance the developer shall enter into a Treatment and
Disposition Agreement (TDA) with the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians to
address treatment and disposition of archaeological / cultural resources and
human remains associated with Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians that may be
uncovered or otherwise discovered during ground disturbing activities related to
the project. The TDA may establish provisions for tribal monitors, and needs to
be submitted to the Planning Division upon after it has been executed.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
2) MM BIO 1 - If construction occurs during the breeding season (February 1 to
August 31), a burrowing owl breeding bird survey following the recommended
guidelines of the MSHCP will be required within 30 days prior to construction to
determine if nesting is occurring on site.
If burrowing owl have colonized the project site, the Applicant will prepare a
Burrowing Owl Protection and Relocation Plan for approval by RCA and
CDFW.
Occupied nests will not be disturbed during the nesting season (February 1
through August 31) unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive
methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg-laying and
incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging
independently and are capable of independent survival.
If the biologist is not able to verify one of the above conditions, then no
disturbance shall occur during the breeding season within a distance
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 7 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
determined by the qualified biologist for each nest or nesting site. For the
burrowing owl, the recommended distance is a minimum of 160 feet.
Relocation of burrowing owl is subject to the above conditions and prior
coordination with RCA, CDFW and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS).
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
3) MM Bio 2 - A breeding bird survey will be required to determine if nesting is occurring
no more than five days prior to ground disturbing activities. Occupied nests will not
be disturbed during the nesting season (February 1 through August 31) unless a
qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult
birds have not begun egg-laying and incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the
occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival.
If the biologist is not able to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance
shall occur during the breeding season within a distance determined by the qualified
biologist for each nest or nesting site.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
4) MM Bio 3 - A condition shall be placed on grading permits requiring a qualified
biologist to conduct a training session for project personnel prior to grading. The
training shall include a description of the species of concern and its habitats, the
general provisions of the Endangered Species Act (Act) and the MSHCP, the need
to adhere to the provisions of the Act and the MSHCP, the penalties associated with
violating the provisions of the Act, the general measures that are being implemented
to conserve the species of concern as they relate to the project, and the access
routes to and project site boundaries within which the project activities must be
accomplished.
Water pollution and erosion control plans shall be developed and implemented
in accordance with RWQCB requirements.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 8 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
The footprint of disturbance shall be minimized to the maximum extent feasible.
Access to sites shall be via pre-existing access routes to the greatest extent
possible.
Equipment storage, fueling, and staging areas shall be located on upland sites
with minimal risks of direct drainage into riparian areas or other sensitive
habitats. These designated areas shall be located in such a manner as to
prevent any runoff from entering sensitive habitat. Necessary precautions shall
be taken to prevent the release of cement or other toxic substances into surface
waters. Project related spills of hazardous materials shall be reported to
appropriate entities including but not limited to applicable jurisdictional city,
FWS, and CDFG, RWQCB and shall be cleaned up immediately and
contaminated soils removed to approved disposal areas.
The removal of native vegetation shall be avoided and minimized to the
maximum extent practicable. Temporary impacts shall be returned to pre -
existing contours and revegetated with appropriate native species.
Exotic species that prey upon or displace target species of concern should be
permanently removed from the site to the extent feasible.
To avoid attracting predators of the species of concern, the project site shall be
kept as clean of debris as possible. All food related trash items shall be enclosed
in sealed containers and regularly removed from the site(s).
Construction employees shall strictly limit their activities, vehicles, equipment,
and construction materials to the proposed project footprint and designated
staging areas and routes of travel. The construction area(s) shall be the minimal
area necessary to complete the project and shall be specified in the construction
plans. Construction limits will be fenced with orange snow screen. Exclusion
fencing should be maintained until the completion of all construction activities.
Employees shall be instructed that their activities are restricted to the
construction areas.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 9 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
The Permittee (City of San Jacinto) shall have the right to access and inspect
any sites of approved projects including any restoration/enhancement area for
compliance with project approval conditions including these BMPs.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
5) MM BIO 4 - The following measures apply to the construction of roadway
improvements with the rights-of-way of Ramona Expressway and East Main Street
that are completed as part of the Project.
Plans for water pollution and erosion control will be prepared for work involving
the movement of earth in excess of 50 cubic yards. The plans will describe
sediment and hazardous materials control, dewatering or diversion structures,
fueling and equipment management practices, use of plant material for erosion
control. Plans will be reviewed and approved by the City prior to construction.
Timing of construction activities will consider seasonal requirements for breeding
birds and migratory non-resident species. Habitat clearing will be avoided during
species active breeding season defined as March 1 to June 30.
Sediment and erosion control measures will be implemented until such time soils
are determined to be successfully stabilized.
Silt fencing or other sediment trapping materials will be installed at the
downstream end of construction activities to minimize the transport of sediments
off-site.
The footprint of disturbance will be minimized to the maximum extent Feasible.
Access to sites will occur on pre-existing access routes to the greatest extent
possible.
Equipment storage, fueling and staging areas will be sited on non-sensitive
upland wildlife habitat types with minimal risk of direct discharge into riparia n
areas or other sensitive wildlife habitat types.
Exotic species removed during construction will be properly handled to prevent
sprouting or regrowth.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 10 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Training of construction personnel will be provided.
Ongoing monitoring and reporting will occur for th e duration of the construction
activity to ensure implementation of best management practices.
Active construction areas shall be watered regularly to control dust and minimize
impacts to adjacent vegetation.
All equipment maintenance, staging, and dispensing of fuel, oil, coolant, or any
other toxic substances shall occur only in designated areas within the proposed
grading limits of the project site. These designated areas shall be clearly marked
and located in such a manner as to contain run-off.
Waste, dirt, rubble, or trash shall not be deposited in the Conservation Area or
on native habitat.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
6) MM CR 1 - Should cultural/archaeological resources be encountered during ground
disturbing activities for the project, work must be halted in the area within 50 feet of
the find and a qualified archaeologist notified immediately to assess the significance
of the find. Construction activities could continue in other areas. If the discovery
proves to be significant, additional work, such as data recovery excavation, may be
warranted and would be discussed in consultation with the property owner, the City
of San Jacinto, or any other relevant regulatory agency, as appropriate.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
7) MM CR 2 - In the event of the discovery of human remains, the Riverside County
coroner shall be immediately notified. If human remains of Native American origin
are discovered during ground disturbing activities, the applicant shall comply with
the State law relating to the disposition of Native American burials that fall within the
jurisdiction of the NAHC (PRC Section 5097). According to California Health and
Safety Code, six or more human burials at one location constitute a cemetery
(Section 8100), and disturbance of Native American cemeteries is a felony (Section
7052). Section 7050.5 requires that excavation be stopped near discovered human
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 11 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
remains until the coroner can determine whether the remains are those of a Native
American. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the California
Native American Heritage Commission and the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians
shall be notified, and appropriate measures provided by State law shall be
implemented to determine the most likely living descendant(s). Disposition of the
remains shall be overseen by the most likely living descendants to determine the
most appropriate means of treating the human remains and any associated grave
artifacts.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Engineering
Department
8) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall submit three (3) copies of a
comprehensive grading plan at 40-scale for review and approval to the Engineering
Department with any required fee and one (1) copy to the Project Planner. The plan
shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, City Grading Standards,
and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial
conformance with the approved grading plan. The plan shall be drawn on 24" X 36"
Mylar by a registered civil engineer. A copy of all pages of these conditions shall be
included in the plans.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
9) Grading and public improvements shall be installed in accordance with City
standards and specifications. The tops of all graded slopes shall be at the property
line. Any graded area that remains undeveloped between phases shall be
maintained with a decomposed granite concrete mix, to prevent wind and water
erosion.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 12 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
10) The grading plan shall include the following, for Planning approval:
A. An ADA path of travel enhanced with decorative paving, stamped concrete,
pavers, or another material differentiating the walk from the asphalt parking
area as approved by Planning and Community Development Director.
B. A public sidewalk with special decorative paving accents where crossed by
driveway entrances to parking lots.
C. Parking areas surfaced with Portland-Cement Concrete paving to a minimum
4-inch thickness over native soil compacted to 95% compaction or asphalt
concrete with 2½ inch thickness over 4 inches of Class II aggregate base
compacted to 95% relative compaction, or as approved by the City Engineer.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
11) A final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted and
approved, including a project description, and identifying Best Management
Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain
system to the maximum extent practicable. The Water Quality Management Plan
shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the City’s
adopted requirements.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
12) The proposed site design BMPs selected for this project have been approved in
concept as a Master WQMP. The individual parcels shall submit Final WQMP
Addendums including plans and details providing the elevations and slopes of the
three bio-retention basins, the detention basin and other details for the proposed
structural BMPs. The Public Works Department shall review and approve the Final
WQMP document, plans and details. The property owners will also provide signed
agreements presenting shared responsibilities for the BMP maintenance.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 13 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Planning
13) MM GEO 2 - All earthmoving during project implementation at or below 4 feet
requires full-time paleontological monitoring, as follows:
A qualified paleontologist (graduate degree and more than one year of
professional experience as a principal investigator) will be retained to provide
paleontological services. The principal paleontologist will be responsible to
implement and oversee monitoring and to maintain professional standards of
work. The principal paleontologist will report all mitigation and monitoring
activities, or related actions of the paleontological resources team to the City,
as appropriate, including discussing a reduction in monitoring from full- to part-
time after monitoring is initiated and no fossils have been identified.
A qualified paleontological monitor will perform monitoring of construction
grading and excavations that take place in the older Pleistocene sediments at
depths of 4 feet or more. The monitor will have authority to divert grading away
from exposed fossils temporarily in order to recover the fossil specimens.
Cooperation and assistance from on-site personnel will greatly assist timely
resumption of work in the area of the fossil discovery.
Discovery of fossil producing localities requires documentation including
measured stratigraphic columns and geologic samples for analysis. Any fossils
recovered that meet significance criteria will be prepared, identified, and
cataloged before donation to an appropriate repository. The Western Science
Center in Hemet, California is recommended as an appropriate repository.
The principal paleontologist retained will prepare a final report. The report will
include a list of specimens recovered, documentation of each locality,
interpretation of fossils recovered, and will include any specialists’ reports as
appendices.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 14 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Engineering
Department
14) A geotechnical engineering report shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior
to issuance of a grading permit, and all requirements identified in the report
shall be met. The report must be prepared by a California licensed geotechnical
engineer or civil engineer skilled in soils/foundation investigations and shall be
submitted for review by the Building & Safety Department prior to the issuance
of grading or building permits. All requirements identified in the report shall be
met.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Engineering
Department
15) Onsite and offsite fire hydrants shall be installed as determined by the Fire
Department.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Engineering
Department
16) The developer/property owner shall submit the following to the City Engineer for
review and approval:
Onsite Grading Plan and Erosion Control Plan – All pads shall be graded to
be a minimum of 1’ above 100-year calculated water surface elevation or
adjacent finished grade. Plans shall show the approved WDID No.
Drainage Plan, Hydrology and Hydraulic Report
Final WQMP (for reference)
Water & Sewer Plan – Fire Department and EMWD approval required prior
to City Engineer approval.
Street Improvement Plan
Traffic Signal Plans prepared by Traffic Engineer
Signing and Striping plan prepared by Traffic Engineer
Streetlight Plan prepared by a Registered Electrical Engineer per City of San
Jacinto standards. Street lights shall be LS3 – LED type.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 15 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
The project’s design shall be in compliance with EMWD, Riverside County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Riverside County, Caltrans,
City of San Jacinto and ADA most recent standards, criteria and
requirements and in effect at the time of construction and coordinated with
approved plans for adjacent developments.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Engineering
Department
17) The developer/property owner shall provide water and sewer service to this
project in accordance with the requirements of the appropriate utility purveyors.
This project is within City of San Jacinto sewer service area and Eastern
Municipal Water District’s water service area. Water and sewer improvements
shall be installed per EMWD Standards and Fire Department requirements.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Engineering
Department
18) The incremental increase in runoff volume between developed and undeveloped
state for the 85th percentile storm, shall be retained within onsite private
detention facilities. The applicant larger storms proposes to collect into the
detention system and discharge them into Main Street through a curb outlet.
Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activity/
Grading
Engineering
Department
19) This project is located within the limits of the San Jacinto Valley Area Drainage
Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted by the City. Drainage fees shall
be paid as set forth under the provisions of the “Rules and Regulations for
Administration of Area Drainage Plan”.
During
Construction Planning 20) MM NOI 4 - Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use.
During
Construction Planning
21) MM NOI 1 - Construction shall occur during the permissible hours as defined in
Section 8.40.090.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 16 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
During
Construction Planning
22) MM NOI 2 - During construction, the contactor shall ensure all construction
equipment is equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices.
During
Construction Planning
23) MM NOI 3 - The contractor shall locate equipment staging areas that will create
the greatest distance between construction -related noise/vibration sources and
sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits –SPDR 17-17
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
24) All buildings except for the retail building located on Parcel 1 for which Design
Review of Elevations were included for SPDR 17-17 shall submit for and obtain
Site Plan and Design Review approval.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
25) The developer shall enter into an agreement with the City franchised trash
hauler for the removal of construction waste and debris from the construction
site.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
26) Submit a detailed landscape and irrigation plan for review and approval. The
landscape plans shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect in
conformance with Chapter 17.325 – Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation
and Section 17.325.060 — Landscape and Irrigation Submittal Package
Requirements of the Development Code and the City Landscape Design
Guidelines for review and approval by the City Landscape Architect. Plans
should be submitted at least 30 days prior to the expected date of permit
issuance.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 17 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
27) Submit, for Planning approval, an outdoor lighting plan in compliance with the
following:
A. A site plan showing all parking lot light standards, building mounted light
fixtures, and any up-lighting in landscaping, low-level walk lights, and
lighting diffused off of wall surfaces.
B. Cut sheets for all proposed lighting fixtures.
C. The lighting shall be indirect, hooded, and arranged to reflect lighting
away from adjoining properties and streets in compliance with Section
17.300.080 (Outdoor Light and Glare).
D. Parking lot light standards shall be a maximum of 25 feet in height
overall, as measured from the usable parking or driving surface.
E. Outdoor lighting shall maintain a minimum of one-foot candle
illumination for all parking and pedestrian areas and shall not exceed
one-half foot candle along property lines of the subject site.
F. Include a photometric plan that includes details such as beam spreads
and/or photometric calculations, location and type of fixtures, and
arrangement of exterior lighting that does not create glare or hazardous
interference to adjacent streets or properties.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
28) Submit for Planning approval, the plans for trash enclosures. Pursuant to City
standards, trash receptacles shall be enclosed by a six (6) foot high solid
decorative masonry wall with solid view-obstructing gates, a solid roof with trellis
feature, an ADA accessible pedestrian entrance and a drain to the sewer system.
The enclosures shall be designed so they cannot be entered into in any way when
door and gates are closed and locked. Approved Trash Enclosure plans shall be
shown on the plans submitted for Plan Check.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 18 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits I
Planning
29) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall record a “Water Quality
Management Plan and Urban Runoff BMP Transfer Access and Maintenance
Agreement,” to provide public notice of the re quirement to implement the
approved Final project-specific WQMP and the maintenance requirements
associated with the WQMP.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
30) The developer/applicant or successor in interest may have to secure coverage
under the State’s General Industrial Activities Storm Water Permit as issued by
the State Water Resources Control Board.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
31) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall ensure the following
pursuant to Section XII. I of the 2010 NPDES Permit. Field verification that
structural Site Design, Source Control, and Treatment Control BMPs are
designed, constructed and functional in accordance with the approved Final Water
Quality Management Plan (WQMP). City WQMP Inspector will be notified for
required inspections during construction.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 19 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
32) MM GEO 1 - The Soil and Foundation Report (Soils Southwest, 2017) provides
foundation recommendations to minimize seismic-induced settlement hazards.
These include using conventional checkered/waffle type rigid footings for exterior
load bearing walls along with interior grade beams, or using a rigid mat foundation.
Additional recommendations address concrete slab construction and cu ring,
excavation and fill, pavement and utility trenches. The recommendations identified
in the Soil and Foundation Report, or similar measures approved by a registered
civil engineer, shall be incorporated into the construction plans. Project plans will
be reviewed during the plan check process to confirm geotechnical design
measures are incorporated to address the potential for seismic-induced
settlement. These measures shall be incorporated into final construction plans
prior to issuance of building permits.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Engineering
33) MM TRAF 2 - Ramona Expressway/Main Street-Lake Park Drive: The project
applicant shall restripe the eastbound approach to include one left turn lane, one
through lane, and one shared through/right turn lane.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
34) MM NOI 7 - All HVAC units on the roofs of the retail buildings on Parcels 1 and 2
shall be shielded to maintain the nighttime standard of 45 dBA at the adjacent
residential property line. A parapet or acoustic screen shall be provided that
extends two feet in height above the top of the HVAC units. A noise control
analysis of the HVAC plans and specifications shall be provided prior to issuance
of building permits to ensure that the HVAC units would not exceed the 45 dBA
standard at the adjacent residential property line.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 20 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Building &
Safety
35) Any building, sign, or structure to be constructed or located on site, will require
professionally prepared plans based on the most current City and California
Building Codes, submitted for review and approval and comply with the following:
The proposed roof-mounted equipment shall be completely screened so as
not to be visible from any street or private property adjacent to the Project.
The screening shall be an integral part of the building; details shall be provided
to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to issuance of
building permits. Any proposed change shall be reviewed and approved by
the Planning Department.
Any ground mounted equipment or equipment attached to the building,
including gas and electrical meters, and electrical or mechanic cabinets shall
be completely screened so as not to be visible from any street or private
property adjacent to the Project. Chain link fencing is not an approved
screening material.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Building &
Safety
36) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall pay school fees as required
by State law. The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall receive written
clearance from the San Jacinto Unified School District.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Building &
Safety
37) All lumber scraps, combustible materials, and other debris shall be picked up
daily, or more often as required by the Building and Safety Division.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Cal Fire –
Riverside
County Fire
Department
38) The required water system, including all fire hydrant(s), shall be installed and
accepted by the appropriate water agency and the Riverside County Fire
Department prior to any combustible building material placed on an individual lot.
Approved water plans must be at the job site.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 21 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Cal Fire –
Riverside
County Fire
Department
39) Fire Sprinkler System: All structures 3,600 square feet or larger will be required to
install a fire sprinkler system in accordance with the CFC and NFPA 13. Ref. CFC
903.2 as amended by the City of San Jacinto.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Cal Fire –
Riverside
County Fire
Department
40) Fire hydrants shall be located within 400’ of all exterior portions of the structures,
along required fire apparatus access roads, and adjacent to public streets in the
quantities and up to the maximum distance as required by California Fire Code
and Riverside County Fire Department.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Cal Fire –
Riverside
County Fire
Department
41) The address shall be posted per Riverside County Fire Department standards
and will be clearly visible from public roadway.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Engineering
Department
42) The developer shall provide water and sewer services to this project in accordance
with the requirements of the appropriate utility purveyor. This project is within the
Eastern Municipal Water District’s sewer and water service area. Water and sewer
improvements shall be installed per EMWD standards.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Engineering
Department
43) All rights-of-way dedication shall be offered to the public and shall continue in
force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. Dedications shall be free
from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Engineering
Department
44) Paved access shall be provided to the proposed buildings per precise grading
plan.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 22 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Engineering
Department
45) The developer/property owner shall submit a compaction certification from the
Soils Engineer in compliance with the approved geotechnical/soils report.
Prior to Occupancy – SPDR 17-17
Prior to
Occupancy Planning 46) All required on-site improvements shall be installed per approved plans.
Prior to
Occupancy Planning
47) Lighting shall be provided throughout the parking area at all hours of customer
and employee use.
Prior to
Occupancy Planning
48) All landscaping, dust control measures, all walls/fences, pedestrian walkways,
irrigation systems, etc. as delineated on the approved landscape plan shall be
installed.
Prior to
Occupancy Planning
49) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall submit the following items
for the landscape and irrigation development and maintenance:
a. The signed Landscape Certificate of Completion pursuant to Section
17.325.070 – Certificate of Completion of the Development Code;
b. The irrigation scheduling pursuant to Section 17.325.080 – Irrigation
Scheduling of the Development Code;
c. The Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Schedule pursuant to Section
17.325.090 – Landscape and Irrigation maintenance Schedule of the
Development Code; and
d. The Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and Irrigation Water Use Analysis
pursuant to Section 17.325.100 — Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and
Irrigation Water Use Analysis of the Development Code.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 23 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Occupancy Planning
50) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall pay any outstanding
planning application or processing fees.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
51) The City has adopted Traffic Signal Mitigation fees and the Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program; this Project shall be subject to the payment of
these fees prior to the issuance of building permits unless exempted by the
ordinance establishing the TUMF program. The fees shall be subject to the
provisions of the enabling ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in effect at
the time of fee payment.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
52) The City of San Jacinto has adopted the area-wide Multi-Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP). This Project is subject to the payment of fees prior
to the occupancy. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of the enabling
ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in effect at the time of payment.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
53) Specific addresses for each building shall be provided to make such number
plainly visible from the public street, avenue, court, or alley upon which property
fronts, and shall be contrasting color and background.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
54) Prior to occupancy all Department/Division requirements and signoffs shall be
complete.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 24 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
55) Improve Ramona Expressway Urban Arterial Highway Standard (modified –
146’/114’ including an 18’ wide raised landscaped median and 16-foot parking) to
include installation of half-width street improvements along the property frontage;
curb and gutter located 57’ west of centerline and a 12’ wide Class 1 multi-purpose
trail within the 16’ wide parkway. If the existing pavement is in good condition the
developer/property owner may use grind and overlay technique as determined by
the City Engineer. The design shall provide the lane assignments as depicted on
the conceptual signing and striping plan prepared by Michael Baker International
as included in the staff report.
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
56) Improve Main Street - Secondary Highway Standard (100’/64’) to include
installation of 6’ wide sidewalk within the 18’ wide parkway. If the existing
pavement if in good condition the developer/property owner may use grind and
overlay technique as determined by the City Engineer.
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
57) Upgrade the existing traffic signal at the southwest corner of the intersection of
Main Street and Ramona Expressway to ultimate design per City of San Jacinto
and Riverside County Standards.
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
58) Install traffic signals at the intersection of Ramona Expressway and Donna Way
to ultimate design per City of San Jacinto and Riverside County Standards. This
will require removal of a portion of the existing median to accommodate turning
movement for northbound Ramona Expressway traffic, and the removal of the
existing porkchop at the existing pavement if in good condition may be grind and
overlayed as determined by the City Engineer
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 25 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
59) The developer’s traffic study indicates that Main and Hewitt would not operate at
an acceptable level of service after development of the site. Therefore, the
developer shall install the signal at Hewitt and Main Street. Alternatively, the
Developer shall execute the Soboba Mitigation Agreement, and provide the City
with funds as detailed in the terms to that agreement. The City, subject to Council
approval, would allocate funds toward the installation of the signal by a City
administered public works contract. Removed By the Planning Commission
(August 27, 2019).
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
60) The driveways on Main Street and Ramona Expressway shall be limited to right -
in/right-out only.
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
61) Existing cables (under 66kv) shall be undergrounded and poles removed. All
other poles if in conflict with proposed improvements shall be relocated, this may
impact a signal pole at Ramona Expressway and Donna Way.
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
62) Streetlights shall be installed on Ramona Expressway, Main Street and Donna
Way adjacent to the site, as approved by the City Engineer.
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
63) The property owner(s) shall support the continuous maintenance of the street
lighting by annexing to the appropriate district prior to Certificate of Occupancy.
All onsite lighting, drainage facilities, WQMP improvements and parking/median
landscaping shall be the responsibility of the property owner. The property owner
shall be responsible to pay its share of the maintenance of the traffic signals at
the intersections of:
Ramona Expressway and Main Street
Ramona Expressway and Donna Way
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 26 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Main Street and Hewitt Street
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
64) Any appurtenances damaged or broken during the development of this project
shall be repaired or removed and replaced by the developer/property owner to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed
shall be reset by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and
Professional Code 8771.
Prior to
Occupancy
Engineering
Department
65) MM TRAF 1 - Main Street/Hewitt Street: The project applicant shall make a fair
share contribution to the construction of a signal at this location.
Prior to
Occupancy
Riverside
County
Environmental
Health
66) A Hazardous Materials Business Plan permit must be obtained prior to operation.
California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) submittal necessary
(http://cers.calepa.ca.gov/)
Prior to
Occupancy
Special
Districts
67) Establish a funding mechanism for the maintenance of public improvements and
public safety services.
Annexation into the Community Facilities District (CFD) for Public Facilities
Maintenance (MC 15.08.015) is an option to fulfill the funding requirement for
maintenance of public improvements.
$21,800.00 + $25 per parcel
Funding of services under the City’s CFDs will consist of an annual assessment
based on the costs of such services, as determined by a City’s Engineer’s
Estimate, established at the time of annexation.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 27 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Timing Responsible
Department Condition of Approval – Luiseno Village MET?
Prior to
Occupancy
Special
Districts
68) Development must comply with Storm Water Basin & Pump Specifications and
Standards.
Prior to
Occupancy
Special
Districts
69) Development must comply with Landscape and Irrigation Design Guidelines.
Prior to
Occupancy
Special
Districts
70) Landscape improvements shall have irrigation water meters, exclusive for right -
of-way landscaping.
Prior to
Occupancy
Special
Districts
71) Landscape areas in the right-of-way shall have an independent irrigation control
system, exclusive for right-of-way landscaping.
Cal-Sense 3000 or newer is required for all irrigation areas
Overall Project Operational Conditions
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
72) MM NOI 5 - Solid Waste and recycling collection shall only occur during daytime
hours (7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.).
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
73) MM NOI 6 - Truck deliveries shall only occur during daytime hours (7:00 a.m.
and 7:00 p.m.).
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 28 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Conditions For CUP 17-09
Description: Service Station with 24 fuel stations, a 3,048 square foot Convenience Store , with a type 20 license for beer
and wine sales, and 1,105 square foot car wash.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits –CUP
Prior to
Grading Planning 74) The developer shall submit a Site Plan & Design Review for review and
approval.
Prior to
Grading Planning
75) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall submit three (3) copies of a
comprehensive grading plan at 40-scale for review and approval to the
Engineering Department with any required fee and one (1) copy to the Project
Planner. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, City
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. The plan shall be
drawn on 24" X 36" Mylar by a registered civil engineer. A copy of all pages of
these conditions shall be included in the plans.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
76) Submit a detailed landscape and irrigation plan for review and approval. The
landscape plans shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect in
conformance with Chapter 17.325 – Water Efficient Landscape and Irrigation and
Section 17.325.060 — Landscape and Irrigation Submittal Package Requirements
of the Development Code and the City Landscape Design Guidelines for review
and approval by the City Landscape Architect. Plans should be submitted at least
30 days prior to the expected date of permit issuance.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Building &
Safety
77) Any building, sign, or structure to be constructed or located on site, will require
professionally prepared plans based on the most current City and California
Building Codes, submitted for review and approval.
Prior to
Issuance of Planning 78) Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with
SCAQMD rules, Rule 201 – Permit to Construct, Rule 203 – Permit to Operate,
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 29 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Building
Permits
and Rule 461 – Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing by obtaining the proper
permits from SCAQMD.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Building &
Safety
79) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall pay school fees as required
by State law. The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall receive
written clearance from the San Jacinto Unified School District
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Riverside
County
Environmental
Health
80) For the Convenience Store and Gas Station, the construction plan and permit
shall be submitted to County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health
and be approved prior to starting construction.
Prior to Occupancy
Prior to
Occupancy Planning 81) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall pay any outstanding
planning application or processing fees.
Prior to
Occupancy Planning
82) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall record a “Water Quality
Management Plan and Urban Runoff BMP Transfer Access and Maintenance
Agreement,” to provide public notice of the requirement to implement the approved
Final project-specific WQMP and the maintenance requirements associated with
the WQMP.
Prior to
Occupancy Planning
83) The developer/applicant or successor in interest may have to secure coverage
under the State’s General Industrial Activities Storm Water Permit as issued by
the State Water Resources Control Board.
Prior to
Occupancy Planning
84) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall ensure the following,
pursuant to Section XII. I. of the 2010 NPDES Permit:
Field verification that structural Site Design, Source Control, and Treatment
Control BMPs are designed, constructed and functional in accordance with the
approved Final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). City WQMP Inspector
will be notified for required inspections during construction.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 30 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
The irrigation scheduling pursuant to Section 17.325.080 – Irrigation
Scheduling of the Development Code;
The Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Schedule pursuant to Sec-tion
17.325.090 – Landscape and Irrigation maintenance Schedule of the
Development Code; and
The Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and Irrigation Water Use Analysis
pursuant to Section 17.325.100 — Irrigation Audit, Irrigation Survey, and
Irrigation Water Use Analysis of the Development Code.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
85) Prior to final inspection by Building and Safety Division and/or issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy the applicant shall pay in full all fees.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
86) Specific addresses for each building shall be provided to make such
number plainly visible from the public street, avenue, court, or alley upon which
property fronts, and shall be contrasting color and background.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
87) Prior to occupancy all Department/Division requirements and signoffs shall be
complete.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
88) The City has adopted Traffic Signal Mitigation fees and the Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program; this Project shall be subject to the payment of
these fees prior to the issuance of building permits unless exempted by the
ordinance establishing the TUMF program. The fees shall be subject to the
provisions of the enabling ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in effect at
the time of building permit issuance.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
89) The City of San Jacinto has adopted the area-wide Multi-Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP). This Project is subject to the payment of fees prior
to the issuance of building permits unless exempted by the ordinance establishing
the MSHCP program. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of the enabling
ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit
issuance.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 31 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Prior to
Occupancy
Riverside
County
Environmental
Health
90) A Hazardous Waste Generator Permit must be obtained prior to operation.
Prior to
Occupancy
Riverside
County
Environmental
Health
91) A Hazardous Materials Business Plan permit must be obtained prior to
operation. California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) submittal
necessary (http://cers.calepa.ca.gov/)
Prior to
Occupancy
Riverside
County
Environmental
Health
92) An Underground Storage Tank operating permit must be obtained prior to
operation. DEH Hax Mat Plan Check process required.
OPERATONAL CONDITIONS
Operation
Conditions Planning 93) A Hazardous Waste Generator Permit must be obtained prior to operation.
Operation
Conditions Planning
94) The service station with a convenience store with off-sale beer and wine license
shall be operated as described in the submitted application for this Project and
as described in the body of the staff report; unless superseded by these
conditions of approval.
Operation
Conditions Planning
95) The service station with a convenience store with off-sale beer and wine license
shall be developed and operated per the required standards of the Development
Code
Operation
Conditions Planning
96) A copy of the Conditional Use Permit and Final Conditions of Approval shall be
available at the site and presented to City staff, including the Police Department
and Code Enforcement, upon request. Failure to have the latest approved
conditions available upon request will be grounds for revocation of the
Conditional Use Permit.
Operation
Conditions Planning 97) A copy of the California Department of Alcohol and Beverage Control license for
the premises shall be available at the site and presented to City staff, including
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 32 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
the Police Department and Code Enforcement, upon request. Failure to have the
license available upon request will be grounds for revocation of the Conditional
Use Permit.
Operation
Conditions Planning
98) The off-sale alcohol premises shall be posted to indicate that it is unlawful for an y
person to drink or consume any alcoholic beverage in any public place or posted
premises.
Operation
Conditions Planning 99) A sign shall be posted in front of the convenience store indicating that no loitering
is permitted.
Operation
Conditions Planning 100) No sale of alcoholic beverages shall be made from a drive-through lane or
window.
Operation
Conditions Planning 101) The display area of the alcoholic beverages shall be limited to 2% of the total
floor area of the store, as depicted on the conceptual floor plan
Operation
Conditions Planning 102) No displays of beer and wine shall be located within five-feet of the store’s
entrances, windows or checkout counter.
Operation
Conditions Planning 103) Cold beer and wine shall be sold from, or displayed in, the main, permanently
affixed electrical coolers only.
Operation
Conditions Planning
104) No beer or wine advertising shall be located on service station islands; no
advertising for beer or wine shall be located on buildings or windows visible to
the exterior.
Operation
Conditions Planning
105) All security cameras, both interior and exterior, around the facility covering the
inside and outside of the building as well as surrounding areas, shall be
maintained in good operational service and used 24 hours a day
Operation
Conditions Planning 106) At least 240 hours of video data will be recorded and saved for future playback
or review.
Operation
Conditions Planning
107) The business windows of the convenience store shall not be tinted or obscured
in any way, including by temporary or painted window signs, and the interior
lighting of the building shall remain at adequate levels to clearly see into the
business from the exterior.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 33 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Operation
Conditions Planning
108) The subject alcoholic beverage license shall not be exchanged for a public
premises type license or operated as a public premise. All alcoholic beverages
sold shall be for consumption off the premises.
Operation
Conditions Planning 109) All storage and display of merchandise and supplies must be conducted within
the building.
Operation
Conditions Planning 110) Lighting shall be provided throughout the parking area at all hours of customer
and employee use.
Operation
Conditions Planning
111) All parking and drive aisles shall be screened from the public right -of-way with a
landscape hedge or decorative wall, as reviewed and approved by the Planning
and Community Development Director.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 34 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Conditions For MUP 17-09
Project Description: A Minor Use Permit for a fast-food restaurant with drive-through service totaling 2,800 square feet.
Prior to Grading
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
112) The developer shall submit a Site Plan & Design Review for review and approval.
Prior to
Issuance of
Building
Permits
Planning
113) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall submit three (3) copies of
a comprehensive grading plan at 40-scale for review and approval to the
Engineering Department with any required fee and one (1) copy to the Project
Planner. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, City
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. The plan shall be
drawn on 24" X 36" Mylar by a registered civil engineer. A copy of all pages of
these conditions shall be included in the plans.
Prior to Building Permits
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
114) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall pay school fees as required
by State law. The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall receive
written clearance from the San Jacinto Unified School District.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
115) Any building, sign, or structure to be constructed or located on site, will require
professionally prepared plans based on the most current County and California
Building Codes, submitted for review and approval.
Prior to Occupancy
116) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall pay any outstanding
planning application or processing fees.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
117) Specific addresses for each building shall be provided to make such number
plainly visible from the public street, avenue, court, or alley upon which property
fronts, and shall be contrasting color and background.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 35 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
118) Prior to occupancy all Department/Division requirements and signoffs shall be
complete.
119) Prior to final inspection by Building and Safety Division and/or issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy the applicant shall pay in full all fees.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
120) The City has adopted Traffic Signal Mitigation fees and the Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program; this Project shall be subject to the
payment of these fees prior to the issuance of building permits unless exempted
by the ordinance establishing the TUMF program. The fees shall be subject to
the provisions of the enabling ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in
effect at the time of building permit issuance.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
121) The City of San Jacinto has adopted the area-wide Multi-Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP). This Project is subject to the payment of fees prior
to the occupancy. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of the enabling
ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in effect at the time of payment.
Operational Conditions
Operational
Conditions Planning
122) The fast-food restaurant with a drive-through, automated car wash and tire store
shall be operated as described in the submitted application for this Project and as
described in the body of the staff report; unless superseded by these conditions
of approval.
Operational
Conditions Planning
123) The permit a fast food restaurant with a drive -through, automated car wash, and
tire store shall be developed and operated per the required standards of the
Development Code.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 36 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Conditions of Approval – MUP 17-10
Project Description: A Minor Use Permit for a fast-food restaurant with drive-through service totaling 3,200 square
feet.
Prior to Grading
Prior to Precise
Grading Planning 124) The developer shall submit a Site Plan & Design Review for review and
approval.
Prior to Precise
Grading Planning
125) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall submit three (3) copies of
a comprehensive grading plan at 40-scale for review and approval to the
Engineering Department with any required fee and one (1) copy to the Project
Planner. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, Cit y
Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. The plan shall
be drawn on 24" X 36" Mylar by a registered civil engineer. A copy of all pages
of these conditions shall be included in the plans.
Prior to Building Permits
Prior to
Building
Permits
Building and
Safety
126) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall pay school fees as required
by State law. The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall receive
written clearance from the San Jacinto Unified School District.
Prior to
Building
Permits
Building and
Safety
127) Any building, sign, or structure to be constructed or located on site, will require
professionally prepared plans based on the most current County and California
Building Codes, submitted for review and approval.
Prior to Occupancy
Prior to
Occupancy Planning 128) The developer/applicant or successor in interest shall pay any outstanding
planning application or processing fees.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
129) Prior to final inspection by Building and Safety Division and/or issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy the applicant shall pay in full all fees.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
130) Specific addresses for each building shall be provided to make such
number plainly visible from the public street, avenue, court, or alley upon which
property fronts, and shall be contrasting color and background.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
Conditions of Approval
Page 37 of 37
General Notes, Requirements, and Conditions of Approval
Luiseno Village -
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
131) Prior to occupancy all Department/Division requirements and signoffs shall be
complete.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
132) The City has adopted Traffic Signal Mitigation fees and the Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program; this Project shall be subject to the
payment of these fees prior to the issuance of building permits unless exempted
by the ordinance establishing the TUMF program. The fees shall be subject to
the provisions of the enabling ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in
effect at the time of building permit issuance.
Prior to
Occupancy
Building &
Safety
133) The City of San Jacinto has adopted the area-wide Multi-Species Habitat
Conservation Plan (MSHCP). This Project is subject to the payment of fees prior
to the occupancy. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of th e enabling
ordinance and based upon the fee schedule in effect at the time of payment.
Prior to
Occupancy Public Works 134) All exterior lighting shall be LED, including both wall packs and parking
lights. Interior lighting shall be LED as well
Operational Conditions
Operational
Conditions Planning
135) The fast-food restaurant with a drive-through, automated car wash and tire store
shall be operated as described in the submitted application for this Project and
as described in the body of the staff report; unless superseded by these
conditions of approval.
Operational
Conditions Planning
136) The permit a fast food restaurant with a drive-through, automated car wash, and
tire store shall be developed and operated per the required standards of the
Development Code.
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: 4 - Planning Commission Recommended Conditions of Approval (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: September 17, 2019 City Council Staff Report (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05; CUP-4.1.a
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Luiseno Village City Council Staff Report 10-1-2019 (Luiseno Village (SPDR-17-17, CZ-17-05;4.1.a
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Luiseno Village SR 10-15-2019 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) RESOLUTION NO: 3781
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING SITE PLAN AND DESIGN
REVIEW 17-17 FOR A COMMERCIAL CENTER, CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT CUP-17-09 TO PERMIT A SERVICE STATION WITH AN
AUTOMATED CAR WASH AND A CONVENIENCE STORE WITH OFF-
SALE GENERAL ALCOHOL LICENSE; MINOR USE PERMIT 17-09 TO
PERMIT A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THROUGH,
MINOR USE PERMIT 17-10 TO PERMIT A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT
WITH DRIVE-THROUGH, MINOR USE PERMIT 17-11 TO EXCEED THE
PARKING REQUIREMENTS BY 5%, VARIANCE 17-05 TO ALLOW 24
FUEL PUMPS; LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF RAMONA
EXPRESSWAY EXTENDING BETWEEN MAIN STREET AND DONNA
WAY.
WHEREAS, the Saboba Band of Luiseno Indians filed applications on November
21, 2017 and June 24, 2019: 1) Site Plan and Design Review (SPDR) 17-17; 2) Change
of Zone (CZ) 17-05; 3) Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 17-09; 4) Variance (VAR) 17-05;
5) Minor Use Permit (MUP) 17-09; 6) Minor Use Permit (MUP) 17-10; 7) Minor Use
Permit (MUP) 17-11; for Luiseno Village (“Applications”), located on the west side of
Ramona Expressway extending between Main Street and Donna Way (“Subject Site”);
WHEREAS, the Applications are proposed to develop the Luiseno Village Project
as a commercial development with SPDR 17-17 for the review of the commercial center
and overall site and building design of a 14,583 square foot retail building, CUP 17-09 to
permit a service station with an automated car wash and a convenience store with an
off-sale general alcohol license, MUP 17-09 to permit a fast food restaurant with a drive-
through, MUP 17-10 to permit a fast food restaurant with a drive-through, MUP 17-11 to
exceed the parking requirements by more than 5% and VAR 17 -05 to allow 24 fuel
pumps where a maximum of 15 are permitted by the Development Code (“Project”) ;
WHEREAS, the Application was reviewed, studied, and found to comply with the
California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) as more fully described below:
WHEREAS, on August 27, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of San
Jacinto (“Commission”) conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which
time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the Project were heard , and the
Project was comprehensively reviewed, and the project was recommended for approval
by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on September 17th and October 1st, 2019, October 15, 2019 and
November 5, 2019 the City Council of the City of San Jacinto conducted duly noticed
public hearings on the Application at which time all persons wishing to testify in
connection with the Application were heard and the Application was comprehensively
reviewed by the City Council; and
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: RESOLUTION 3781-11-5-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, ordered and determined by the City
Council of the City of San Jacinto:
SECTION 1. Based on the entire record before the City Council, all written and
oral evidence presented, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the
findings made in this Resolution, the City Council hereby approves SPDR 17-17, CUP
17-09, MUP 17-09, MUP 17-10, MUP 17-11, and VAR 17-05, subject to the Findings of
Fact and Conditions of Approval in the staff report.
SECTION 2. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written
and oral evidence presented, the City Council finds:
The proposed use will not be detrimental to surrounding properties and
neighborhoods including ensuring that the use does not contribute to loitering,
public drunkenness, noise, obstructing pedestrian and vehicular traffic, parking,
crime, interference with pedestrian corridors used by children, defacement, and
damage to structures;
The proposed use will not adversely impact the suitability of adjacent
commercially zoned properties for commercial uses;
The proposed use will not adversely affect the welfare of residents in the area or
result in an undue concentration in the neighborhood of establishments
dispensing alcoholic beverages, including beer and wine. For purposes of this
subparagraph, “undue concentration” shall be as defined in the Business and
Professions Code Section 23958.4;
The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific
plan;
The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zone and complies with all
other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the Municipal Code;
The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity
will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity;
The site is physically suitable in terms of:
Its design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed
use;
The provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access;
Public protection services (e.g., fire protection, police protection, etc.); and
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: RESOLUTION 3781-11-5-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
The measure of site suitability shall be required to ensure that the type, density,
and intensity of use being proposed will not adversely affect the public
convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare, constitute a nuisance, or
be materially injurious to the improvements, persons, property, or uses in the
vicinity and zone in which the property is located;
The applicant agrees in writing to comply with any and all of the conditions
imposed by the Approving Authority in the approval of the Conditional Use
Permit.
The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific
plan.
The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zone and complies with all
other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the Municipal Code.
The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity
will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity.
There are special circumstances applicable to the subject property (e.g., location,
shape, size, surroundings, topography, or other physical features) that do not
apply generally to other properties in the vicinity under an identical zoning
classification;
Strict compliance with Development Code requirements would deprive the
subject property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under
an identical zoning classification;
Approving the Variance would not constitute a grant of special privileges
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the same vicinity and zone
in which the subject property is situated; and
The requested Variance would not allow a use or activity that is not otherwise
expressly authorized by the regulations governing the subject parcel.
SECTION 3. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written
and oral evidence presented, the City Council finds the A pplication complies with CEQA
for the following reasons:
An environmental analysis has been conducted which evaluated information and
impacts based on the specifics of this proposed project. This analysis
determined that, although the proposed project could have a significant effect on
the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because
revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent
and other effects will be mitigated to a level of less than significant impact.
Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration and its associated Mitigation
Monitoring Plan is recommended.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: RESOLUTION 3781-11-5-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
SECTION 4. The location and custodian of the documents and any other
material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council based
its decision is as follows: Planning Director, City of San Jacinto Planning Department,
595 S. San Jacinto Ave, San Jacinto, CA 92583. (909) 487-7330.
SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective upon its
adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council
on the 5th Day of November 2019 by the following vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CITY OF SAN JACINTO:
___________________________
Russell Utz, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Angela Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BEST BEST & KRIEGER, LLP
______________________________
Michael J. Maurer, City Attorney
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: RESOLUTION 3781-11-5-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
3403 10th Street, Suite 320
Riverside, California 92501
P.O. Box 1667
Riverside, California 92502-1667
Phone: (951) 955-9700
Fax: (951) 955-8873
www.wrc-rca.org
Board of Directors
Chairperson
Jonathan Ingram
City of Murrieta
Daniela Andrade
City of Banning
Julio Martinez
City of Beaumont
Ed Clark
City of Calimesa
Jeremy Smith
City of Canyon Lake
Jacque Casillas
City of Corona
Jocelyn Yow
City of Eastvale
Michael Perciful
City of Hemet
Lorena Barajas
City of Jurupa Valley
Natasha Johnson
Vice Chairperson
City of Lake Elsinore
Lesa Sobek
City of Menifee
David Marquez
City of Moreno Valley
Kevin Bash
City of Norco
David Starr Rabb
City of Perris
Andy Melendrez
City of Riverside
Crystal Ruiz
City of San Jacinto
James Stewart
City of Temecula
Joseph Morabito
City of Wildomar
Kevin Jeffries
County of Riverside
Karen Spiegel
County of Riverside
Chuck Washington
County of Riverside
V. Manuel Perez
County of Riverside
Jeffrey Hewitt
County of Riverside
Executive Staff
Charles Landry
Executive Director
October 17, 2019
Kevin White
City of San Jacinto
595 S. San Jacinto Ave
San Jacinto, California, 92583
Dear Mr. White:
Please find the following JPR attached:
JPR 19-09-04-02. The Local Identifier is SPDR 17-17 / Luiseno Village. The
JPR file attached includes the following:
RCA JPR
Exhibit A, Vicinity Map with MSHCP Schematic Cores and Linkages
Exhibit B, Criteria Area Cells with Riverside County Vegetation and
Project Location
Exhibit C, Criteria Area Cells with Soils and Proposed Project Impacts
Exhibit D, Conservation and Avoidance Areas
Regional Map
Thank you,
________________________
Wendy Worthey
Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority
cc: Karin Cleary-Rose
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
777 East Tahquitz Canyon Way,
Suite 208
Palm Springs, California 92262
Joanna Gibson
California Dept. of Fish and Wildlife
3602 Inland Empire Blvd. #C220
Ontario, California 91764
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: JPR Letter and Findings (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
RCA Joint Project Review (JPR)
JPR #: 19-09-04-02
Date: 10/17/19
1
Project Information
Permittee: City of San Jacinto
Case Information: SPDR 17-17/ Luiseno Village
Site Acreage: 9.5 acres on-site; 0.98 acre off-site
Portion of Site Proposed for
MSHCP Conservation Area: 11.6
Criteria Consistency Review
Consistency Conclusion: The project is consistent with both the Criteria and Other
Plan requirements.
Data:
Applicable Core/Linkage: Proposed Core 5
Area Plan: San Jacinto Valley
APN Sub-Unit Cell Group Cell
433-160-024
433-160-027
433-160-028
433-160-029
433-160-032
433-160-033
433-160-034
SU3 – Upper San Jacinto
River/ Bautista Creek
Independent
Z
3098
3099
Criteria and Project Information
a. As stated in Section 3.2.3 of the MSHCP, “Proposed Core 5 is comprised of the portion of the upper San
Jacinto River extending from the San Jacinto Mountains to just west of State Street. It is contiguous with
Core Areas in the San Jacinto Mountains and areas downstream along the San Jacinto River. Planning
Species for which Habitat is provided within this Core include mountain yellow-legged frog, arroyo toad,
least Bell's vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, San Bernardino kangaroo rat, and Los Angeles pocket
mouse. Maintenance of floodplain processes and water quality of the San Jacinto River is important for
these species, as well as maintenance of habitat quality. This Core likely provides for movement of
mammals such as mountain lion and bobcat, connecting to Core Areas in the San Jacinto Mountains, Lake
Perris and San Jacinto Wildlife Refuge. In addition to indirect effects associated with adjacent planned
land uses identified in Section 6.0 of this document, flood control activities resulting from adjacent
planned land uses may also adversely affect species such as arroyo toad, San Bernardino kangaroo rat,
least Bell's vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher and Los Angeles pocket mouse.”.
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: JPR Letter and Findings (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
RCA Joint Project Review (JPR)
JPR #: 19-09-04-02
Date: 10/17/19
2
b. The project site is located within Independent Cell 3098. As stated in Section 3.3.13 of the MSHCP,
“Conservation within this Cell will contribute to assembly of Proposed Core 5. Conservation within this Cell
will focus on grassland habitat adjacent to the San Jacinto River. Areas conserved within this Cell will be
connected to grassland habitat proposed for conservation in Cell Group Z to the east. Conservation within
this Cell will range from 5%-15% of the Cell focusing in the southeastern portion of the Cell.”
Additionally, the project site is located within Cell 3099 of Cell Group Z. As stated in Section 3.3.13 of the
MSHCP, “Conservation within this Cell Group will contribute to assembly of Proposed Core 5.
Conservation within this Cell Group will focus on grassland habitat. Areas conserved within this Cell Group
will be connected to grassland habitat proposed for conservation in Cell #3098 to the west and #3204 to the
south. Conservation within this Cell Group will be approximately 5% of the Cell Group focusing in the
southwestern portion of the Cell Group.”
c. Rough Step: The proposed project is within Rough Step Unit 3. Rough Step Unit 3 encompasses 150,086
acres within the north-central portion of western Riverside County (see Figure 5, Rough Step Unit #3). This
Rough Step Unit includes Lake Perris, the San Jacinto Wildlife Area, the San Jacinto River, and the
Lakeview Mountains. This Rough Step area is bounded by Interstate 215 to the west, a branch of the San
Jacinto River to the northeast, State Route 60 to the north, and Newport Road, Olive Avenue, and Stetson
Avenue to the south. There are 32,432 acres within the Criteria Area within Rough Step Unit 3. Key
vegetation communities within Rough Step Unit 3 include: coastal sage scrub, grasslands, playas and vernal
pools, riparian scrub, woodland, forest, and Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub. Based on the 2017 MSHCP
Annual Report, all vegetation categories are “in” rough step. Based on the original MSHCP vegetation
mapping, vegetation on the proposed project site is primarily comprised of grasslands. Therefore,
development on the project site will not conflict with or interfere with the Rough Step Status of Unit 3.
d. Project information provided by the Permittee included a JPR Application Form dated August 26, 2019, a
Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency Analysis (Analysis), prepared
by Origin Environmental Planning, LLC and Envira, and dated October 7, 2019, a General Biological
Assessment (Bio Report), prepared by Envira and dated October 2, 2019, and a San Bernardino Kangaroo
Rat and Los Angeles pocket mouse Presence/Absence Trapping and Burrowing Owl Re-Surveys for Main
Street and Ramona Proposed Project (Focused Species Survey Report), prepared by Envira and dated
October 2, 2019.
The proposed project consists of commercial development with associated parking, landscaping, and off-
site road improvements to Ramona Expressway and East Main Street. The commercial development will
contain retail, fast food restaurants, a gas station, and a carwash. The off-site road improvements include
the widening of Ramona Expressway to 73 feet in order to accommodate a bike/multi-use trail,
landscaping, and other road improvements. Ramona Expressway will not be widened to greater than its
allowable width within the Covered Roads layer. The project site is comprised entirely of disturbed annual
grasslands and the off-site portion of the proposed project is comprised of 0.53 acre of disturbed annual
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: JPR Letter and Findings (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
RCA Joint Project Review (JPR)
JPR #: 19-09-04-02
Date: 10/17/19
3
grasslands and 0.45 acre of existing developed land. Soils within the proposed project include Metz loamy
fine sand and Dello loamy sand. All 9.5 acres of the proposed project and 0.98 acre of the off-site area will
be permanently impacted by the proposed development. All staging areas will be located within the
development footprint.
e. Reserve Assembly: As discussed above, the project site is located in Cell 3098 and Cell 3099 within
Cell Group Z which both contribute to Proposed Core 5.
Approximately 8.7 acres of the 9.5-acre Project Site are located primarily within Cell 3098, independent of a
Cell Group. Conservation within Criteria Cell 3098 will focus on grassland habitat adjacent to the San
Jacinto River. Areas conserved within this Cell will be connected to grassland habitat proposed for
Conservation in Cell Group Z to the east. Conservation within this Cell ranges from 5% to 15% focusing in
the southeastern portion of the Cell. The Project Site is located within the southeast portion of Criteria Cell
3098, within the area described for Conservation. Using low, medium, and high range acreage goals for the
157-acre Criteria Cell 3098, the goals are as follows: low-range (5%) is 7.85 acres, mid-range (10%) is 15.7
acres, and high-range (15%) is 23.55 acres. Currently, no land has been conserved in Cell 3098.
Furthermore, only 5.1 acres are undeveloped and potentially available in this Cell for contribution to
Proposed Core 5. This approximate 5.1 acres does not provide the acreage necessary to achieve even the
7.85-acre low-end of the goal.
In addition, a small portion (0.8 acre) of the Project Site is within Cell 3099, part of Cell Group Z. There are
four Cells in this Cell Group, and Cell 3099 is the southernmost Cell in the Cell Group. Conservation within
this Cell Group will focus on grassland habitat. Areas conserved will be connected to grassland habitat
proposed for Conservation in Criteria Cell 3098 to the west and Criteria Cell 3204 to the south. Conservation
within the 628.2-acre Cell Group Z is approximately 5% focusing in the southwestern portion of the Cell
Group, and the Project Site is located within the southwestern portion described for Conservation. The
acreage needed to achieve the Cell Group Z goal is 31.41 acres. Currently, only 16.9 acres are available
(16.5 acres conserved, and 0.4 acres undeveloped and potentially available for conservation). This
approximate 16.9 acres does not provide the acreage necessary to achieve the 31.41-acre goal.
Based on the above, development of the proposed project would impede the ability of Cell 3089 and Cell
Group Z goals to be achieved. Therefore, the project alone would be considered inconsistent with MSHCP
Reserve Assembly requirements, and requires a Criteria Refinement. To address Reserve Assembly
concerns, the City of San Jacinto in coordination with the project applicant completed Criteria Refinement 19-
02-14-01. The Criteria Refinement was finalized May 23, 2019 (RCA 2019) and is attached for reference.
The Luiseno Village Retail Center proposed an approximate 11.6-acre Replacement Site located northwest of
the Soboba Springs Country Club, south of Soboba Road. The Replacement Site is adjacent to existing
Conserved lands to the west and northwest. The Replacement Site is not described for Conservation in the
MSHCP, and is currently held in trust by the United States for the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians.
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: JPR Letter and Findings (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
RCA Joint Project Review (JPR)
JPR #: 19-09-04-02
Date: 10/17/19
4
Approximately 11.2 acres of the 11.6-acre Replacement Site is located within the southeastern portion of
Cell 2787, approximately 0.16 acre is located within Cell 2893, approximately 0.001 acre is located
within Cell 2895, and approximately 0.249 acre is located outside of the Criteria. The majority of the
Replacement Site is located in Cell 2787 and is discussed in further detail below. Because the areas of
the Replacement Site that extend into Cells 2893 and 2895 are small (approximately 0.4 acres), the
criteria goals for these two Cells is not discussed in further detail.
Conservation within Criteria Cell 2787 would contribute to the assembly of Proposed Linkage 11.
Proposed Linkage 11 is adjacent to Proposed 5 to the west in this same area. The criteria for Cell 2787
focuses on Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub, chaparral, and coastal sage scrub habitat associated with
the San Jacinto River. Areas conserved within Criteria Cell 2787 are intended to be connected to coastal
sage scrub habitat proposed for Conservation in Cell Group W to the north. Conservation within Cell
2787 ranges from 45% to 55% (69.80 to 85.31 acres) focusing in the northern portion of the Cell. The
mid-range of the conservation goal is 77.55 acres. There are 58.1 acres that are already conserved or
undeveloped and potentially available, for contribution to Proposed Linkage 11. Although the
additional 11.2 acres in Cell 2787 are not described for conservation and would not contribute to the
Cell 2787 acreage goal, this acreage would still functionally contribute to Proposed Linkage 11.
The 9.5-acre Project Site includes approximately 8.7 acres of land in Cell 3098 and approximately 0.8
acre in Cell Group Z. Should the Project Site be developed, no on-site conservation is proposed. The
11.6-acre Replacement Site includes land not originally described for conservation.
Conservation of approximately 8.7 acres of the 11.6-acre Replacement Site would compensate for the
development of Criteria Cell 3098 by the project (1:1 replacement ratio), while the remaining
approximately 2.9 acres would compensate for the removal of 0.8 acre in Cell Group Z (3.6:1
replacement ratio). The total acreage being conserved on the Replacement Site (11.6 acres) is greater
than the total area being removed by development of the Project Site (9.5 acres). The proposed project
also includes 0.98 acre of off-site permanent impacts. These impacts were not accounted for in the
Criteria Refinement; however, all impacts are confined within the allowable width of the Covered Roads
layer, which was considered development within the Criteria Analysis. In addition to the higher quantity
of acres, and based on the discussion in the Criteria Refinement, these acres proposed as
replacement/conservation are also of higher quality. Therefore, the Criteria Refinement resulted in
superior preservation of acres that contributed to the MSHCP Conservation Area.
Per the determination in Criteria Refinement 19-02-14-01, the deficits created by the proposed project in
Cell 3098 and Cell Group Z will be offset with the replacement lands. As such, development of the
proposed project would not impede the conservation goals for this linkage or cause fragmentation issues.
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: JPR Letter and Findings (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
RCA Joint Project Review (JPR)
JPR #: 19-09-04-02
Date: 10/17/19
5
Other Plan Requirements
Section 6.1.2 – Was Riparian/Riverine/Vernal Pool Mapping or Information Provided?
Yes. There are no riparian areas on the project site; however, there is a concrete swale south of the
project boundary. There are no vernal pools on the project site, and soils and topography are not
suitable for fairy shrimp. There is no suitable riparian bird habitat on the project site.
Section 6.1.3 – Was Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Information Provided?
Yes. The project site is not located within a Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area (NEPSSA).
Section 6.3.2 – Was Additional Survey Information Provided?
Yes. The project site is located within an Additional Survey Needs and Procedures Area for San Bernardino
kangaroo rat and Los Angeles pocket mouse. The project site is located within an additional Survey
Needs and Procedures Area for burrowing owl. Focused surveys were conducted.
Section 6.1.4 – Was Information Pertaining to Urban/Wildland Interface Guidelines Provided?
Yes. The proposed project site contains a concrete swale that is believed to connect to the San Jacinto
River. As such, these Guidelines shall be implemented accordingly.
Comments on Other Plan Requirements:
a. Section 6.1.2. The project site was evaluated for riparian/riverine resources during the habitat assessment
performed by ENVIRA in 2017 and 2019, the results of which are provided in the Analysis. The Analysis
describes one riverine resource: a concrete swale that is located south and west of the project site. This
feature is four feet wide and eight inches deep, conveying stormwater runoff into the City of San Jacinto’s
stormwater drainage system. According to the Analysis, the stormwater drainage system eventually
conveys flows into the San Jacinto River. The concrete swale is situated within a 10-foot easement owned
by the City of San Jacinto. As such, this feature will be completely avoided by the proposed project. A
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the project describes that the proposed project will
include underground infiltration chambers that will filter all runoff from the proposed project before it
enters the swale. The underground chambers will filter runoff by first conveying the flow through an
isolation chamber before passing it through a crushed rock conduit overlain by commercial fabric, where it
will then be allowed to percolate from a collection chamber. Stormwater that does not percolate will
discharge into the concrete swale via an outlet weir that will be constructed adjacent to the swale (but will
not impact the swale). The outlet weir will be constructed such that treated discharge cannot outlet into the
swale at a greater rate than the rate associated with the site pre-development.
Vernal Pools/Fairy Shrimp: According to FCS, the project site lacks the appropriate soil and vegetation
for vernal pools. The proposed project does not contain evidence of vernal pools or other seasonally-
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: JPR Letter and Findings (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
RCA Joint Project Review (JPR)
JPR #: 19-09-04-02
Date: 10/17/19
6
inundated depressions, including cracked, hydric soils, or standing water. Additionally, no clay soils or
heavy soils were mapped, and no ponding or depression areas that could hold water for an extended period
of time were detected on the project site. Due to the lack of vernal pools and/or other suitable fairy shrimp
habitat, focused surveys for fairy shrimp were not conducted for this project.
Riparian Birds: There is no habitat present on the project site suitable for riparian birds; therefore, no
focused surveys were conducted.
Based on the information provided in the Analysis , the project demonstrates consistency with
Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP.
b. Section 6.1.3: The project site is not in located in the NEPSSA survey area
The project demonstrates consistency with Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP.
c. Section 6.3.2: The Project site is located in the area for additional survey needs for San Bernardino
kangaroo rat and Los Angeles pocket mouse. A habitat assessment for San Bernardino kangaroo rat and Los
Angeles pocket mouse was conducted August 18, 2017 by USFWS-permitted, small mammal biologist,
Philippe Vergne. The habitat assessment detected potential burrows and kangaroo rat scat within the project
site. Therefore, focused trapping surveys were conducted over five nights, from September 7 to September
12, 2017. Updated trapping surveys were conducted again from June 10 to June 15, 2019. Surveys followed
appropriate USFWS protocols for San Bernardino kangaroo rat. Trapping areas consisted of several grids
consisted of 49 traps each, concentrated in areas with sandy loam soils that showed signs of small mammal
use. The 2017 surveys had two grids while the 2019 surveys had three grids. Focused surveys for San
Bernardino kangaroo rat and Los Angeles pocket mouse were both negative. Small mammal species
observed within the project site include western harvest mouse and deer mouse.
The project site is also located in an Additional Survey Area for burrowing owl. A Step I habitat
assessment and Step II-A focused burrow survey was conducted within the project site in 2017 and 2019.
All surveys were conducted in accordance with the Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the Western
Riverside MSHCP (RCA 2006). According to the Analysis, the project site contains ruderal grassland
vegetation that could be suitable for burrowing owl, triggering the subsequent Step II-A focused burrow
surveys. In both 2017 and 2019, the focused burrow survey did not result in potential burrows suitable for
burrowing owl (features with openings 4-inches or greater in diameter) on the project site. Additionally,
the focused burrow survey did not result in any burrowing sign (feathers, pellets, fecal material, prey
remains, etc.) According to the Bio Report, the 2017 Step II-B focused burrow survey resulted in a
burrowing owl pair detection within suitable burrows on a parcel of land north of the project site. Step II-B
focused burrowing owl surveys were not conducted in 2017 due to the lack of suitable burrows within the
project site. The repeated Step I and Step II-B surveys conducted in 2019 did not result in any burrowing
owl or burrowing owl sign detection.
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: JPR Letter and Findings (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
RCA Joint Project Review (JPR)
JPR #: 19-09-04-02
Date: 10/17/19
7
Due to the potential suitable burrowing owl habitat on site a 30-day preconstruction survey for
burrowing owls is required prior to initial ground-disturbing activities. If burrowing owl have
colonized the property site prior to the initiation of construction, the Permittee should
immediately inform RCA and the Wildlife Agencies, and coordinate on the potential need for a
Burrowing Owl Protection and Relocation Plan, prior to initiating ground disturbance.
Based on the documentation provided by ENVIRA and Origin Environmental Planning, the project
demonstrates consistency with Section 6.3.2 of the MSHCP related to CASSA and burrowing owl
survey requirements.
d. Section 6.1.4: To preserve the integrity of areas in the vicinity of the project site which are proposed
Conservation Areas, the Guidelines contained in Section 6.1.4 related to controlling adverse effects for
development adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area may be considered by the Permittee in their
approval actions relative to the project. Specifically, the Permittee may include the following measures
as project conditions of approval:
i. Incorporate measures to control the quantity and quality of runoff from the site entering the
MSHCP Conservation Area. In particular, measures shall be put in place to avoid discharge of
untreated surface runoff from developed and paved areas into MSHCP Conservation Areas. Best
Management Practices (BMPs) will be implemented to prevent the release of toxins, chemicals,
petroleum products, exotic plant materials, or other elements that might degrade or harm
downstream biological resources or ecosystems. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
prepared for the project describes that the proposed project will include underground infiltration
chambers that will filter all runoff from the proposed project before it enters the swale. The
underground chambers will filter runoff by first conveying the flow through an isolation chamber
before passing it through a crushed rock conduit overlain by commercial fabric, where it will then be
allowed to percolate from a collection chamber. Stormwater that does not percolate will discharge
into the concrete swale via an outlet weir that will be constructed adjacent to the swale (but will not
impact the swale). The outlet weir will be constructed such that treated discharge cannot outlet into
the swale at a greater rate than the rate associated with the site pre-development.
ii. Land [AC1]uses proposed in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area that use chemicals or
generate bioproducts, such as manure, that are potentially toxic or may adversely affect wildlife
species, Habitat, or water quality shall incorporate measures to ensure that application of such
chemicals does not result in discharge to the MSHCP Conservation Area. The greatest risk is from
landscaping fertilization overspray and runoff.
iii. Night lighting shall be directed away from the MSHCP Conservation Area and the avoided area
on site to protect species from direct night lighting.
iv. Proposed noise-generating land uses affecting the MSHCP Conservation Area, including designated
avoidance areas, shall incorporate setbacks, berms, or walls to minimize the effects of noise on
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: JPR Letter and Findings (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
RCA Joint Project Review (JPR)
JPR #: 19-09-04-02
Date: 10/17/19
8
MSHCP Conservation Area resources pursuant to applicable rules, regulations, and guidelines related
to land use noise standards.
v. Avoid use of invasive, non-native plant species listed in Table 6-2 of the MSHCP in approving
landscape plans for the portions of the project that are adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area,
including avoidance areas. Considerations in reviewing the applicability of this list shall include
proximity of planting areas to the MSHCP Conservation Areas and designated avoidance areas,
species considered in the planting plans, resources being protected within the MSHCP Conservation
Area and their relative sensitivity to invasion, and barriers to plant and seed dispersal, such as walls,
topography, and other features.
vi. Proposed land uses adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area shall incorporate barriers, where
appropriate, in individual project designs to minimize unauthorized public access, domestic animal
predation, illegal trespass, or dumping into existing and future MSHCP Conservation Areas. Such
barriers may include native landscaping, rocks/boulders, fencing, walls, signage, and/or other
appropriate mechanisms.
vii. Manufactured slopes associated with proposed site development shall not extend into the MSHCP
Conservation Area.
viii. Weed abatement and fuel modification activities are not permitted in the Conservation Area,
including designated avoidance areas.
e. MSHCP Volume I, Appendix C: The following best management practices (BMPs), as applicable,
shall be implemented for the duration of construction:
i. A condition shall be placed on grading permits requiring a qualified biologist to conduct a training
session for project personnel prior to grading. The training shall include a description of the species
of concern and its habitats, the general provisions of the Endangered Species Act (Act) and the
MSHCP, the need to adhere to the provisions of the Act and the MSHCP, the penalties associated
with violating the provisions of the Act, the general measures that are being implemented to
conserve the species of concern as they relate to the project, and the access routes to and project site
boundaries within which the project activities must be accomplished.
ii. Water pollution and erosion control plans shall be developed and implemented in accordance with
RWQCB requirements.
iii. The footprint of disturbance shall be minimized to the maximum extent feasible. Access to sites shall
be via pre-existing access routes to the greatest extent possible.
iv. The upstream and downstream limits of projects disturbance plus lateral limits of disturbance on
either side of the stream shall be clearly defined and marked in the field and reviewed by the
biologist prior to initiation of work.
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: JPR Letter and Findings (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
RCA Joint Project Review (JPR)
JPR #: 19-09-04-02
Date: 10/17/19
9
v. Projects should be designed to avoid the placement of equipment and personnel within the stream channel
or on sand and gravel bars, banks, and adjacent upland habitats used by target species of concern.
vi. Projects that cannot be conducted without placing equipment or personnel in sensitive habitats should be
timed to avoid the breeding season of riparian identified in MSHCP Global Species Objective No. 7.
vii. When stream flows must be diverted, the diversions shall be conducted using sandbags or other
methods requiring minimal instream impacts. Silt fencing of other sediment trapping materials shall
be installed at the downstream end of construction activity to minimize the transport of sediments off
site. Settling ponds where sediment is collected shall be cleaned out in a manner that prevents the
sediment from reentering the stream. Care shall be exercised when removing silt fences, as feasible,
to prevent debris or sediment from returning to the stream.
viii. Equipment storage, fueling, and staging areas shall be located on upland sites with minimal risks of
direct drainage into riparian areas or other sensitive habitats. These designated areas shall be located
in such a manner as to prevent any runoff from entering sensitive habitat. Necessary precautions
shall be taken to prevent the release of cement or other toxic substances into surface waters. Project
related spills of hazardous materials shall be reported to appropriate entities including but not limited
to applicable jurisdictional city, FWS, and CDFG, RWQCB and shall be cleaned up immediately
and contaminated soils removed to approved disposal areas.
ix. Erodible fill material shall not be deposited into water courses. Brush, loose soils, or other similar
debris material shall not be stockpiled within the stream channel or on its banks.
x. The qualified project biologist shall monitor construction activities for the duration of the project to
ensure that practicable measures are being employed to avoid incidental disturbance of habitat and
species of concern outside the project footprint.
xi. The removal of native vegetation shall be avoided and minimized to the maximum extent
practicable. Temporary impacts shall be returned to pre-existing contours and revegetated with
appropriate native species.
xii. Exotic species that prey upon or displace target species of concern should be permanently removed
from the site to the extent feasible.
xiii. To avoid attracting predators of the species of concern, the project site shall be kept as clean of
debris as possible. All food related trash items shall be enclosed in sealed containers and regularly
removed from the site(s).
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: JPR Letter and Findings (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
RCA Joint Project Review (JPR)
JPR #: 19-09-04-02
Date: 10/17/19
10
xiv. Construction employees shall strictly limit their activities, vehicles, equipment, and construction
materials to the proposed project footprint and designated staging areas and routes of travel. The
construction area(s) shall be the minimal area necessary to complete the project and shall be
specified in the construction plans. Construction limits will be fenced with orange snow screen.
Exclusion fencing should be maintained until the completion of all construction activities.
Employees shall be instructed that their activities are restricted to the construction areas.
xv. The Permittee shall have the right to access and inspect any sites of approved projects including any
restoration/enhancement area for compliance with project approval conditions, including these BMPs.
AC
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: JPR Letter and Findings (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
16
20
3
21
65
8
1
15
6
6
20
18
1
14
8
4
5
21
17
9
7
1
2
1
22
10
15
11 14
4
11
1
17
13
11
24
19
18
14
7
7
16
9
12
10
12
3
4 23
13
8
D
D
K
B
EB
E
A
L
MA
I
A
A B
A
K
C
F
A
LG
H
D
J
B
K
C
B
B
C
1
2 3
4
3
5
4
7
1
2
6
1
2
4
7
65
3
5 6
7
7
JPR Log No. 19-09-04-02 - Vicinity Map with MSHCP Schematic Cores and Linkages
SOURCE: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority 2018; County of Riverside 2019Date: 9/6/2019 - Last saved by: agreis - Path: Z:\Projects\RCA\MAPDOC\MAPS\JPRs\2019\09-Series\JPR19090402-ExhibitA_CoresLinks.mxd0 52.5 Miles
Proposed Linkages:
Constrained Linkage
Linkage
Existing Channel
Existing Cores & Linkages:
Constrained Linkage
Core
Linkage
Noncontiguous Habitat Block
Proposed Cores & Habitat Blocks:
Core
Proposed Extension of Existing Cores
Noncontiguous Habitat Block
EXHIBIT A
JPR Log No. 19-09-04-02
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: JPR Letter and Findings (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
2893 2895
2996
3098 3099 3100
3204
2787
Z
MOUNTAI
NAVEHEWITT AVEID
Y
L
L
W
I
L
D
D
R
R
A
M
O
N
A
B
L
V
D
L A K E P A R K D R
SAN JACINTO AVEALESSANDRO AVESOBOBARD
MAIN ST
7TH ST
RAMONA EXPY
JPR Log No. 19-09-04-02 - Criteria Area Cells with Riverside County Vegetation and Project Location
SOURCE: County of Riverside 2019Date: 9/6/2019 - Last saved by: agreis - Path: Z:\Projects\RCA\MAPDOC\MAPS\JPRs\2019\09-Series\JPR19090402-ExhibitB_Vegetation_RiversideCounty.mxd0 1,000500Feet
Cell Group with Identifier
Criteria Cell with Unique ID
JPR Project Site
Public/Quasi-Public Conserved Lands
Vegetation Communities
Agricultural Land
Chaparral
Coastal Sage Scrub
Developed/Disturbed Land
Grassland
Riparian Scrub, Woodland, Forest
Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub
Water
Woodland and Forests
EXHIBIT B
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: JPR Letter and Findings (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
2893 2895
2996
3098 3099 3100
3204
2787
Z
JPR Log No. 19-09-04-02 - Criteria Area Cells with MSHCP Soils and Project Location
SOURCE: USDA/NRCS Soils 2017; County of Riverside 2019Date: 9/6/2019 - Last saved by: agreis - Path: Z:\Projects\RCA\MAPDOC\MAPS\JPRs\2019\09-Series\JPR19090402-ExhibitC_Soils.mxd0 1,000500Feet
Cell Group with Identifier
Criteria Cell with Unique ID
Public/Quasi-Public Conserved Lands
Soil Types:
Dello loamy sand, gravelly substratum, 0 to 5 percent s lopes
Metz loamy fine sand, gravelly sand substratum, 0 to 5 percent slopes
EXHIBIT C
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: JPR Letter and Findings (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
JPR Log No. 19-09-04-02 - Conservation and Avoidance Areas
SOURCE: County of Riverside 2019; Bing Maps 2019Date: 9/6/2019 - Last saved by: agreis - Path: Z:\Projects\RCA\MAPDOC\MAPS\JPRs\2019\09-Series\JPR19090402-ExhibitD_ConservationAvoidanceAreas.mxd0 1,000500Feet
Cell Group with Identifier
Cell with Unique ID
Proposed Development - 9.5 acres
Proposed MSHCP Conservation - 11.6 acres
Public/Quasi-Public Conserved Lands
Covered Roads
Completed JPRs
Proposed Development
Proposed MSHCP Conservation Area
Public Project
EXHIBIT D
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: JPR Letter and Findings (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
CITY OF SANJACINTO
3099
2787
3100
2996
2895
2893
3204
3098
S
O
B
O
B
A R
D
TENTH ST
FIF TH ST
T
ORINOAVE
SOBOBA AVEVERNON AVEMONTROSE AVE
P EA CH S T
SHAVER ST
ART ESIAN AVEWATEKA STTAHQUITZ STCHAD DR7TH ST
MAIN STOLMSTED STSANJOS E DR
COOKS AVEBURT AVE
ROSARIO AVEFIRS T ST
HEWITT STNE
W YORK AVE
AUBURN AVE
MOUNTAI
NAVEBATH AVESAN JACINTO AVEJORDAN AVEALESSANDRO AVELAKE PARK DRRAMONA
E
X
P
Y
ÄÄ79
Rough Step 2
Rough Step 3
Regiona l Map JPR 1 9 -09 -04-02
0 2,000Feet
IRough Step Unit 2 & 3
City of San J acintoCR 19-02-14-01
9/6/2019
JPR Project Boundary
Proposed Development
Publ ic Project
Proposed MSH CP Conservation Area
Crit eria Cell
Rough Step
RCA MSHCP Conserved Land
RCA MSHCP Conservation Easement
Public / Quasi -Publi c Conserved Land
City Boundary
Parcel Boundary
Waterbody
Highway
Joint Revie w Project (JPR)
JP R 19-0 9-04-02JPR 19-0 9-04-02
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: JPR Letter and Findings (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 332Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 333Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 334Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 335Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 336Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 337Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 338Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 339Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 340Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 341Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 342Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 343Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 344Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 345Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 346Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 347Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 348Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 349Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 350Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 351Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 352Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 353Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 354Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 355Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 356Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 357Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 358Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 359Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 360Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 361Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 362Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 363Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 364Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 365Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 366Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 367Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 368Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 369Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 370Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 371Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 372Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 373Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 374Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 375Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 376Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 377Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 378Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 379Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 380Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 381Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 382Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 383Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 384Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 385Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 386Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 387Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 388Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 389Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 390Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 391Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 392Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 393Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 394Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 395Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 396Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 397Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 398Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 399Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 400Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 401Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 402Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 403Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 404Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 405Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
4.1.dPacket Pg. 406Attachment: Revised Initial Study - Luiseno Village 10-29-19 (Luiseno Village CC-SR 11-5-19)
x
'H �'
a)
Im
o
c
m
m
Z
0
a,
W
W
_ ..
W
rny�3
0
LU
o c
CL
_
Q ,, 'a E
a
1—
P S _ LO
Li-
cr o
C
a)
O
Z
N N 1-
0
y a) n w
ro
E
aC
Q
E N
CL
a
IL
y o
U N
t
O
O
Q
o
C,
r-
W
z
� �,� Q
;
CL
=_U
,
—
O
Z
:
U
_
c
�t)oo
=
O
C
a
I-
_�
o
a
I—
�
❑
aoi
`� `� gom
J
co
m
a E
U)
W
W
L
~
C: 3
W
W
Z
m N (�
to O C1
C
N C 3 CD
N C N
w
O
U
W
c E a
E
W
1-
o
°
s
F-
W
Q
Nm U
� aN. —
E
J
R\
U ram+ C G
N
0
a.
Z
❑
`i!
C7
_I
3 0
°
Q
Q
O
M
m .r 01 w
m
U
Q E c
U
>
.Y
c� E= 0
W
V 3
CL
O
Z
�
Q.
N
U1
co
a
N
o
W
GS _
7,
,J
x m Ur
C N min
m m a N z
I� '> d 'O I
C) C w
a W
o`L°ar� w
L_ �y
e ¢ o r+ c LL
a ' 2
❑ ur n U- w
d m c)J
�1 Z n
O U CD w m cu
w 'E � N or ° -- m Q
O a _c _m m m
CL E cn N cu to
N C
0
t` D
r a. U � � � O
w 7 Z o m m w o ~ a.
CL C C ^ C 7, W
m _0
cr .2 0 U LL
c arm c 3 C- 0
U c� IL
_
`a
F.. uw ❑ m T y m J
m v E �n 0 a'
�- _ m a. E m W
3 y W U
m �-
M ,0
LV w m m 4° .0 m e Q
z N E N to Q w U
v �N CL
� tn0
w c E Q E W~
ui m �' as O y F- W
Q � 2M c .� '�' ° E J
❑ 0 .4 c p 0'
W \ r" ur *a L- (.) 0
O `� 3 �°-0 �. o z
o � � .0 v Q
Z` Qtmam3m� w
D Z c CL
N 0 m o m
OU rmn (n � 7 m in 0 W
w ai ar m o x r'
U 0 Z� Q U � E
-0 '9 M°' 0
mL � z
c�>m'a a
o —_ m W
T "'
c� 6 •3 iu L LI
Ci f 0
J a� 15 m W
T -o ' p 1--
El LL'
+ L 0.
v- cn`a w•a- coo 0 J
o m
Z U) ce L.
O a r 9 CL
Y C Uo m En
(D 0
Q O 2 73 -Nd
W Z � ro co (D 0 ~ 1L
1Z 4 --- CD n _ 0 W
N
cn' J Z 5 C c V y ❑
CD w Ira
O H a p ` as .1 C 3 0- 0
c
}, `o GL
Uui
co m 1 _ m C. E (D cr)y W
d a0 W U
C1 a Y
QI 0 UCD
(13 — c Q
W w c M,� 0 o 0
Z :3 fl W U
2 in
o v m wCL
W>
❑ cn U ram+ C c N ig p J R
Z ❑ a.
to p p 4—.-
Lu ( t a+ Q U CD c ❑
O
U `�^ V � o m m Lt]
O Z a)vj -@ ° LA0 o W
6 i ui 2 2 ;� :' 0 c a J
m a a cD a: p„
Q m 0 .o cr 0 c o r m
U ❑ Z CC Q U S 2 cn E E
White, I(evin
Subject: FW: f_u:seno Village UST
Hi Kevin,
Please see EMWD folio-,N- up below.
Josh
Sent from mobile device
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Javier, Aldred" •.iayiera(u?emwd.ort,-
Date: November 4, 2019 at 1:�5:2 7 PM PST
To: Josh Inc; -rid < 0511 Cr!ori *1nei1VC.COIIi
Cc: Michael Castello -mcastello a soboba-nsn.gov>, Lcnell Carter <lcarter c,s_oboba-nsn. ov>,
Ruben De Los Santos <-.Rdelossantos-,ilsobobamep
Subject: RE: Luiseno Village UST
Hello Josh,
Thant: you for coordinating a conference call with Soboba stuff and Steve Boyd from Seven
Eleven Corporation to discuss the UST with a fueling Station at the Luiseno Village project. It
was assuring that Soboba has worked Closely lvith tile Seven Eleven Corporation in meeting the
requirement for the UST design and installation, and that Seven Eleven Corporation Mll manage
the operation and regulatory requirement for the UST and fueling component. From the
conference call, it is understood that the UST and fueling system primary and including the
secondary containments (double walled) are "sealed". The vapor system and secondary
containment will have sensors to immediately detect a break in the system that in most crises will
shut down the fueling operation. Continuous sensor will provide 24.17 information on UST and
fueling system to a third party responsible for responding to issues as well as provide Seven
Eleven Corporation and the station notice of a problem. Additionally, since there is a production
well with 1,000 feet, an additional "tracer" test, to assure the UST and fueling system is sealed,
will be conducted as required. Again, EMWD thanks Soboba's diligent work with Seven Eleven
Corporation to ensure the protection of the groundwater that the City of San Jacinto, EMWD and
Soboba utilized as a source.
If you have any questions or need anything else, please let me know,
Sincerely,
Alfred "Al" Javier
Director of Environmental and Regulatory Compliance
Eastern Municipal Water District
P.O. Box 8300
2270 Trumble Road
Perris, CA 92572-8300
Office (951) 928-3777 ext. 6327
Email: iavieraCriemwdorg
-----Original Message -----
From: Josh Ferris [mailto:josh0eori;einenvr.coml
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2019 6:57 AM
To: Javier. Alfred {iaviera i ernwd.orz--
Cc: Michael Castello imcastello{iisgboba_nsn,,gov-:•; Lenell Carter <IcarterOsoboba-nsn.gov>;
Ruben De Los Santos �<rdelossantos®_ soboba.net-,
Subject: Luiseno Village UST
Hi Al,
Thanks for participating in our call last creek. Please let me know if you have any further
gUCStiOnS that I can help with. As you're probably aware, the project is going before the City
Council tomorrow at 6pm for final consideration. We NVould like to update the City on whether
we have addressed EIN1WD's concerns adccluatCky. Any confirmation you could provide would be
greatly appreciated.
Many thanks,
Josh
Josh Ferris
Origin Environmental Planning, LLC
(p) (916) 265-2608
(c) (207) 266-4669
(f) (916) 265-2324