HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 10/21/2014
AGENDA
JOINT REGULAR MEETING
OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
October 21, 2014, 6:30 p.m.
625 South Pico Avenue
San Jacinto Community Center, San Jacinto, CA 92583
1. ORGANIZATION
1.1 Call to Order
1.2 Roll Call
1.3 Invocation
1.4 Pledge of Allegiance
1.5 Special Presentations
1.6 MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Now is the time for the public to address the Council on any subject within the jurisdiction of the City
Council not listed on the agenda. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring
to address the City Council.
3. JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS (SECTIONS 3A AND 3B)
The matters listed under Consent Calendars are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion
by City Council Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to
the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed
and/or discussed. If an item is pulled, it will be heard after the balance of the Consent Calendar has
been voted on.
3A CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL
3A.1 Continuance of the Proclamation of the Local State of Emergency due to
the Severe Winter Storms that began on April 29, 2014 / Approve / City
Clerk
3A.2 Waiver of Full Reading of Ordinance(s), and Reading by Title Only /
Approve / City Clerk, City Attorney
3A.3 Minutes of October 7, 2014 - Regular Meeting / Approve / City Clerk
City Council Agenda
October 21, 2014
Page 2 of 3
3A.4 Warrants and Disbursements - September 2014 / Approve / Finance
Director
3B CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
4. PUBLIC HEARING
4.1 Proposed Resolution to Approve the Engineer's Report for LLPD 2 Annexation
No. 89 and to Approve Annexation of property to LLPD No. 2 as Annexation
No. 89 and to levy and collect Annual Assessments within Annexation No. 89
for FY 2015-2016 / Approve / Finance Director, Consultant
5. STAFF REPORTS
At the end of the scheduled City Department items, anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item
should come forward upon invitation of the Mayor; state their name, address, and the consent calendar
item number pulled. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes.
5.1 Resolution No. 3539 / expressing the City Council's intent to commit a set
percentage of UUT proceeds to Public Safety Services. / Approve / City
Manager
5.2 Resolution No. 3540 / establishing a DUI Emergency Response Cost Recovery
Program ("Program") to hold persons driving impaired by alcohol, drugs, or
both financially accountable for their actions by recovering emergency
response expenses. / Approve / City Manager
6. MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
7. CLOSED SESSION
7A CLOSED SESSION - CITY COUNCIL
7A.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION -
- Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of
Section 54956.9: (two (2) potential cases)
7B CLOSED SESSION - SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
8. ADJOURNMENT
City Council Agenda
October 21, 2014
Page 3 of 3
If you challenge any action of the City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to
the City Council (c/o the City Clerk) at, or prior to, the public hearing.
CHALLENGE TO LAND USE DECISIONS: Any person seeking to challenge a decision regarding land use
made by the City Council as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, shall
be required to commence that action 90 days following the date on which the decision of the City Council
becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Please refer to Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes final.
It is the intention of the City of San Jacinto to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all
respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need
special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every
reasonable manner. Please contact City Hall at (951) 537-6358, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to
inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible.
Any writing related to an agenda item for an open session of a regular meeting of the City Council that is
distributed less than 72 hours prior to the meeting will be made available for public inspection at the City
Clerk's office, located at 595 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California, and at the regular meeting
location - City of San Jacinto Community Center, 625 South Pico Avenue, San Jacinto, California - at the time
the writing is distributed to a majority of the City Council
DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OPEN SESSION AGENDAS (SB 343) -- Any public record,
relating to an open session agenda item, that is distributed within 72 hours prior to the
meeting is available for public inspection at the public counter located in the Administration
Building of City Hall, 595 S San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583
I, Richard Miller, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that I caused to be posted the foregoing
agenda this 16th Day of October, 2014, as required by law.
Richard Miller, City Clerk
October 21, 2014
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Miller, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Continuance of the Proclamation of the Local State of Emergency due to
the Severe Winter Storms that began on April 29, 2014
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, approve to the continuance of the
Proclamation of the Local State of Emergency due to the Severe Wind Storms that
began on April 29, 2014.
DISCUSSION:
On April 30, 2014 the Director of Emergency Services/City Manager proclaimed the
existence of a local emergency resulting from the severe and damaging winter storms that
began on or about 8:00 a.m. on April 29, 2014. Government Code section 8630 requires
the City Council to ratify any local emergency proclaimed by a local official such as the
Director of Emergency Services/City Manager within seven days. Thereafter, the City
Council shall at least once every 30 review the need for continuing the local emergency.
ALTERNATIVES:
1) Consent to the continuance of the Proclamation of the Local State of Emergency
(Staff Recommendation).
2) Do Not Consent to the continuance.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City’s ability to obtain or continue to receive federal, state or regional
disaster/emergency relief funding may be impacted if the City Council does not Consent
to continue the proclamation of the local state of emergency. Substantial budgetary
impacts are apparent for recovery efforts to include substantial employee overtime
salaries; purchases of materials, supplies and equipment; use of private
contractors/force labor; and other repairs to city right-of-way facilities (Preliminary
estimates range from thirty to eighty thousand dollars). Budgetary assistance and
reimbursement is available from Federal Emergency Management Agency (F.E.M.A.)
PACKET PAGE: 1
AGENDA ITEM 3A.1
for related costs for limited recovery efforts to critical infrastructure including: electrical,
power, telecommunications, water supply, public safety, and transportation.
ATTACHMENTS:
· Copy of Resolution Number 3506
PACKET PAGE: 2
AGENDA ITEM 3A.1
PACKET PAGE: 3AGENDA ITEM 3A.1
PACKET PAGE: 4AGENDA ITEM 3A.1
October 21, 2014
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Miller, City Clerk
Jeff Ballinger, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Waiver of Full Reading of Ordinance(s), and Reading by Title Only
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, waive the full reading of any and all
ordinances on this meeting’s agenda, and authorize their reading by title only.
BACKGROUND:
Government Code Section 36934 requires that all ordinances shall be read in full either
at the time of their introduction or their passage. However, Government Code Section
36934 allows the waiver of this requirement by regular motion adopted by majority vote
if the title of the ordinance is read.
This waiver can be accomplished at the time of each ordinance action, or as a standing
waiver, accomplished as a consent calendar motion. In order to stream-line the process
for the passage of ordinances, the City Attorney and staff propose the second option,
which is the waiver of any and all ordinances on this agenda.
ALTERNATIVES:
Approval: Approve the addition of the attached language to all future agendas of the
City Council, thus waiving the full reading of all future ordinances.
Denial: Do not approve the agenda language and, instead, before the passage of any
ordinance and after the reading of its title, make a motion that must be adopted by
majority vote that allows a waiver of the full reading.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
PACKET PAGE: 5
AGENDA ITEM 3A.2
October 21, 2014
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rick Miller, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Minutes of October 7, 2014 - Regular Meeting
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, approve the draft minutes of the
October 7, 2014 Regular Meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
· Draft Minutes of October 7, 2014 – Regular Meeting
PACKET PAGE: 7
AGENDA ITEM 3A.3
ACTION MINUTES
JOINT REGULAR MEETING
OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
October 7, 2014
6:30 p.m.
625 S. Pico Ave
San Jacinto Community Center, San Jacinto, CA 92583
1. ORGANIZATION
1.1 Call to Order
Mayor Alonso Ledezma called the Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City
Council and the successor agency to the City of San Jacinto Redevelopment
Agency to order at 6:30 p.m.
1.2 Roll Call
Present: Bartel, Kotyuk, Miller, Ruiz, Ledezma
Absent: None
1.3 Invocation
Pastor Peter Masonis gave the invocation.
1.4 Pledge of Allegiance
Ron Kammeyer led the Pledge of Allegiance
1.5 Special Presentations
1.5.1 Watermaster Status Briefing
Behrooz Mortazavi gave the presentation on the water master status.
1.6 MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS
Council Members gave their reports.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Public Speakers:
· Esther Applegate
· Jack Warneke
· Stacey Hurtado
· Russ Utz
PACKET PAGE: 9
AGENDA ITEM 3A.3
Action Minutes
October 7, 2014
____________________________________________________________________________________Page 2 of 4
2.1 City Manager’s Report on previous month’s public comments.
City Manager Tim Hults gave his report.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
3A CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL
3A.1 Continuance of the Proclamation of the Local State of
Emergency due to the Severe Winter Storms that began on
April 29, 2014 / Approve / City Clerk
3A.2 Waiver of Full Reading of Ordinance(s), and Reading by Title
Only / Approve / City Clerk, City Attorney
3A.3 Amendment of the Conflict of Interest Code Pursuant to the
Political reform Act of 1974 / Approve / City Clerk
3A.4 Minutes of September 16, 2014 - Regular Meeting / Approve /
City Clerk
3A.5 Treasurer's Report at August 31, 2014 / Approve / City
Treasurer
3A.6 Side Letters to the Memorandums of Understanding with
San Jacinto Management Association and Service
Employees International Union Local 721 (SEIU) / Approve /
City Manager
3A.7 Public Improvement Fee Credit Agreement - CADO San
Jacinto, LLC (Tentative Tract Nos. 31037, 31037-1 and
31037-2) / Approve / City Attorney
M/S/C (Kotyuk/Miller) moved to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar. Motion
carried 5/0.
Ayes: Bartel, Kotyuk, Miller, Ruiz, Ledezma
Nays: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
3B CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF CITY OF SAN JACINTO
4. PUBLIC HEARING
None
PACKET PAGE: 10
AGENDA ITEM 3A.3
Action Minutes
October 7, 2014
____________________________________________________________________________________Page 3 of 4
5. STAFF REPORTS
5.1 Street Sweeping Parking Enforcement Program – 20 minutes
Public Works Special Project Consultant Lynn Merrill presented the staff report.
Public Comment:
· Russ Utz
By consensus Item 5.1 was tabled until January, after the results of the election.
5.2 Authorization to provide advance written notice to the County of Riverside
requesting public safety service reductions in the event the City does not
receive supplemental revenue
City Manager Tim Hults presented the staff report.
Council Member Kotyuk recommended going back to the Sheriff’s department
in the 2nd year and informing them of an additional 15% reduction. Council
Member Kotyuk also recommended closures to the Community Center and
Sallee Pool be added to the language of Resolution 3535.
M/S/C (Kotyuk/Miller) moved to approve Item 5.2 with additions to the language in
Resolution 3535 as stated above. Motion carried 5/0.
Ayes: Bartel, Kotyuk, Miller, Ruiz, Ledezma
Nays: None
Absent: None
Abstain: None
There was no Closed Session this evening.
6. CLOSED SESSION
6.1 CLOSED SESSION - CITY COUNCIL
6.2 CLOSED SESSION - SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
NONE
PACKET PAGE: 11
AGENDA ITEM 3A.3
Action Minutes
October 7, 2014
____________________________________________________________________________________Page 4 of 4
7. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business before the City Council, Mayor Alonso Ledezma
adjourned the Regular Meeting of the City Council at 8:23 p.m.
City of San Jacinto
______________________
Alonso Ledezma, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________
Richard Miller, City Clerk
Approved as read: ________
Approved as amended: ____
PACKET PAGE: 12
AGENDA ITEM 3A.3
October 21, 2014
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Thomas Prill, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Warrants and Disbursements – September 2014
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council review and approve Warrants and Disbursements for
the period of September 1 through September 30, 2014 in the amount of $1,677,545.44
DISCUSSION:
The City Council in its oversight role formally reviews disbursements of City funds made by
Accounts Payable warrants, bi-weekly payrolls and electronic funds (wire) transfers. The
following information is provided for such review and approval:
Warrants/Wire Pay Date Amount
Accounts Payable: # 109987-110242 Various $ 1,425,796.27
Payroll: Pay Period # 18 # 22022-22037 09/04/2014 $ 141,685.35
Includes Warrants, Direct Deposits, Taxes, Garnishments
Payroll: Pay Period # 19 # 22038-22053 09/18/2014 $ 110,063.82
Includes Warrants, Direct Deposits, Taxes, Garnishments
Electronic Funds Various $ 0.00
Total Disbursements – Period of September 1-30, 2014 $ 1,677,545.44
Prepared by: Judy Kelley, Account Clerk II
Known Councilmember Conflicts: Check #’s 110000, 110114, 110231.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditures by warrant, payroll direct deposit and electronic funds (wire) transfers have been
appropriated.
Attachments:
Accounts Payable Warrant Register – September 1-30, 2014
Note: Payroll information is on file in the Finance Department.
PACKET PAGE: 13
AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 15AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 16AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 17AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 18AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 19AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 20AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 21AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 22AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 23AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 24AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 25AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 26AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 27AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 28AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 29AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 30AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 31AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 32AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 33AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 34AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 35AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 36AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 37AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 38AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 39AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 40AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 41AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 42AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 43AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 44AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 45AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 46AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 47AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 48AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 49AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 50AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 51AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
PACKET PAGE: 52AGENDA ITEM 3A.4
October 21, 2014
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Tom Prill, Finance Director
NBS, Consultant
SUBJECT: Proposed Resolution to Approve the Engineer’s Report for LLPD 2
Annexation No. 89 and to Approve Annexation of property to LLPD No. 2
as Annexation No. 89 and to levy and collect Annual Assessments within
Annexation No. 89 for FY 2015-2016
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends:
1. That the City Council, by motion, approve and adopt Resolution No. 3537 to approve the
Engineer’s Report for the annexation of property known as Kirby Village, APN 436-450-019 to
the City of San Jacinto LLPD No. 2 as Annexation No. 89; and
2. That the City Council conduct the Public Hearing, Order the Canvass of the Election, and at
the conclusion of the public hearing if the City Council determines that a majority protest does
not exist, by motion, approve and adopt Resolution No. 3538 Ordering Annexation of Territory to
Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 and to levy and collect assessments for LLPD No.
2 Annexation No. 89 for FY 2015-2016.
DISCUSSION:
Staff is recommending that the City Council take all actions that are necessary to annex the
property to during the City Council meeting on October 21, 2014. The owner of the property
proposed to be annexed to LLPD No. 2 has waived all notice requirements pertaining to these
annexation proceedings.
As required by the Act, the notice and assessment ballot has been mailed to the record owner
of the property proposed to be annexed to the District with instructions to vote and return the
ballot to the City before conclusion of the public hearing.
LLPD No. 2 is divided among the original area and approximately 87 annexation areas called
zones with assessments involving over 7,394 individual parcels. The Resolution approves the
District Engineer’s report for the annexation of property known as APN 436-450-019 to the City
of San Jacinto LLPD No. 2 as Annexation No. 89 and to levy and collect assessments within
Annexation No. 89 for the FY 2015-2016 tax roll.
PACKET PAGE: 53
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
After approving the Engineer’s Report, the City must first hold a public hearing and conduct the
protest election and then, if a majority protest does not exist, consider adoption of the resolution
authorizing the levy of annual assessments and confirming the diagram and assessments of the
LLPD No. 2 Annexation 89.
The Resolution of Intention was adopted by the City Council on September 16, 2014. The
District Engineer’s report was presented as part of the Resolution of Intention and a public
hearing date of October 21, 2014 was set as part of the Resolution of Intention. A copy of the
Engineer’s report is included again for your reference.
Only properties with estimated specific benefits, including initial operating reserve are being
assessed in FY 2015-2016.
The attached Resolution is a part of the required procedure for the annexation and levy and
collection of assessments in an assessment district.
ALTERNATIVES:
Property owner assessments pay for the maintenance of facilities (parks, greenbelts, drainage
facilities, etc.) annexed into the district. Maintenance for the facilities would cease should the
resolution to levy not be adopted.
FISCAL IMPACT:
LLPD No. 2 Annexation No. 89 would potentially levy and receive $12,065.40 in property
assessments, which would offset the costs of maintaining the district facilities.
ATTACHMENTS:
LLPD No. 2 Engineer’s Report
Resolution No. 3537 Approving the Engineer’s Report
Resolution No. 3538 Approving Annexation of Property to LLPD No. 2
PACKET PAGE: 54
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Main Office
32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 100
Temecula, CA 92592
Toll free: 800.676.7516 Fax: 951.296.1998
Regional Office
870 Market Street, Suite 1223
San Francisco, CA 94102
Toll free: 800.434.8349 Fax: 415.391.8439
City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting, and
Park District No. 2, Annexation No.89 (Kirby Village)
Engineer’s Report
September 2014
PACKET PAGE: 55
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND
PARK DISTRICT NO.2, Annexation No.89 (Kirby Village)
595 S. San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
Phone -(951)537-6380
CITY COUNCIL
Alonso Ledezma, Mayor
Crystal Ruiz,Mayor Pro Tem
Mark Bartel,Council Member
Andrew Kotyuk, Council Member
Scott Miller,Council Member
CITY STAFF
Tom Prill, Finance Director
Mike Emberton,Assistant City Manager
Debbie Vickery,Special Districts Administrator
Michelle Holmes, Senior Accountant
NBS
Danielle Wood,Client Services Director
Pablo Perez,Project Director
Jason Roth, Consultant
PACKET PAGE: 56
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.ENGINEER’S LETTER ................................................................1-1
2.OVERVIEW ..................................................................................2-1
2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................2-1
2.2 Process for Proposed Assessment ..............................................................2-1
3.PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ..................................................3-1
3.1 Description of the Boundaries ......................................................................3-1
3.2 Description of Improvements and Services ..................................................3-1
4.MAP OF IMPROVEMENTS..........................................................4-2
5.ESTIMATE OF COSTS ................................................................5-1
5.1 Budget ..........................................................................................................5-1
6.METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ......................................................6-1
6.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................6-1
6.2 General Benefit ............................................................................................6-1
6.3 Special Benefit .............................................................................................6-2
6.4 Method of Assessment Spread ....................................................................6-3
6.5 Assessment Formula ...................................................................................6-4
6.6 Assessment Unit Method .............................................................................6-4
6.7 Cost of Living Inflator ...................................................................................6-4
7.ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ...........................................................7-1
8.ASSESSMENT ROLL ..................................................................8-1
PACKET PAGE: 57
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Landscape, Lighting, & Park District No. 2 Annexation 89 –City of San Jacinto 1-1
Prepared by NBS –Fiscal Year 2015/16
1.ENGINEER’S LETTER
WHEREAS,on April 4,2002, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto (”City”), State of California,
under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (“1972 Act”) (California Streets and Highways Code
section 22500 et seq.) established the Landscaping, Lighting and Park District known and designated
as “Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2”; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to annex property to the district known as Assessor’s Parcel Number
436-450-019 (the “property”) to the City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2
(“District”)as Annexation No.89;and
WHEREAS,on September 16,2014, the City Council under the 1972 Act, Article XIIID, section 4 of
the Constitution of the State of California (“Article XIIID”) and the Proposition 218 Omnibus
Implementation Act (“Proposition 218”) (California Government Code section 53750 et seq.), (the
1972 Act, Article XIIID, and Proposition 218 are collectively referred to as the “Assessment Law”),
approved the commencement of procedures within the proposed area for Annexation No. 89 so that
owners of the property may approve annexation to the District to provide funding for maintenance of
improvements which provide special benefit to the property; and
WHEREAS, NBS has been directed to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report for Annexation No. 89.
NOW THEREFORE, the proposed assessments as detailed in this Engineer’s Report and as
summarized in the table below are made to cover the portion of the estimated costs of maintenance,
operation and servicing of said improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the
District in proportion to the special benefit received.
Description
FY 2015/16
Maximum Budget
FY 2015/16 Estimated
Actual Budget
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance $6,890.79 $6,890.79
Park Maintenance 0.00 0.00
Landscape Maintenance 2,382.09 2,382.09
Storm Drain Maintenance 1,860.93 1,860.93
Concrete Maintenance 1,267.73 1,267.73
Graffiti Removal 3,428.11 3,428.11
General Benefit (3,764.31)(3,764.31)
Total $12,065.34 $12,065.34
The landscape maintenance and irrigation water for landscaping in the public right-of-way will be
provided by the property owner. If said property owner fails to properly maintain said public
landscaping, the City will, upon due process, take over the financing of the public landscaping by
adding these items.
In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the Assessment Law:
1.I identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the
improvements described in this Engineer’s Report (the “Specially Benefited Parcels”). For
particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment
Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Engineer’s Report.
PACKET PAGE: 58
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
PACKET PAGE: 59
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Landscape, Lighting, & Park District No. 2 Annexation 89 –City of San Jacinto 2-1
Prepared by NBS –Fiscal Year 2015/16
2.OVERVIEW
2.1 Introduction
This Engineer’s Report (“Report”) describes Annexation No. 89 as a zone of the City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting,and Park District No. 2 (the “Zone”)and the charge per Assessment Unit (AU)
for Fiscal Year 2015/16 based on the estimated cost to maintain the improvements and provide the
services that benefit parcels within the Zone.This Zone, by special benefit assessments, provides
funding for the installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of street lights and traffic signals;
the installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaped areas (parkways,sidewalks, etc.); the
installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of drainage facilities; and graffiti removal from
horizontal and vertical surfaces which are appurtenant to the above items; all of which are located in
public rights-of-way or easements in the District.
The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this report, refers to an individual property assigned its own
assessor’s parcel number by the Riverside County Assessor’s Office.The Riverside County
Auditor/Controller uses assessor’s parcel numbers and specific fund numbers to identify on the tax
roll properties assessed for special district benefit assessments.
2.2 Process for Proposed Assessment
The City cannot increase or levy new assessments within the District without complying with the
procedures specified in Article XIIID and Proposition 218. In November 1996, the voters in the State
of California added Article XIIID to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements,
the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each
property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express
their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. The
basic steps of the assessment ballot procedure are outlined below.
The City must prepare a Notice of Public Hearing (“Notice”), which describes, along with other
mandated information, the reason for the proposed assessments and provide a date, time and
location of a public hearing to be held on the matter.The City must also prepare an assessment
ballot, which clearly gives the property owner the ability to sign and mark their assessment ballot
either in favor of, or in opposition to, the proposed assessment. The Notice and assessment ballot are
mailed to each affected property owner within the District a minimum of 45 days prior to the public
hearing date as shown in the Notice.
After the Notice and assessment ballot are mailed, property owners are given until the close of the
public hearing, stated in the Notice, to return their signed and marked assessment ballot. During the
public hearing,property owners are given the opportunity to address the City Council and ask
questions or voice their concerns.After the public hearing, the returned assessment ballots received
prior to the close of the public hearing are tabulated, weighted by the proposed assessment amount
on each property and the results are announced by the City Council.
Article XIIID provides that if, as a result of the assessment ballot proceeding, a majority protest is
found to exist, the City Council shall not have the authority to enact or increase the assessments as
proposed.A majority protest exists if the assessments represented by ballots submitted in opposition
exceed those submitted in favor of the assessment.All returned ballots are tabulated and weighted
according to the financial obligation of each particular parcel.
If there is no majority protest as described above, the City Council may approve the proposed
assessments in Annexation No. 89.
PACKET PAGE: 60
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Landscape, Lighting, & Park District No. 2 Annexation 89 –City of San Jacinto 3-1
Prepared by NBS –Fiscal Year 2015/16
3.PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The plans and specifications showing and describing the general nature, location and extent of the
improvements to be operated and maintained within Annexation No. 89 are on file in the office of the
City Clerk and are incorporated herein by reference.
3.1 Description of the Boundaries
The proposed boundary of Annexation No. 89 to the District is completely within the City Limits of the
City of San Jacinto and is shown on the Boundary Map found in Section 6 of this Report and on file in
the office of the City Clerk at the San Jacinto City Hall. The boundary includes the parcels of land that
are located in the vicinity of street lighting, landscaping,sidewalk and drainage improvements that
were, or soon will be, installed as a condition of approval of a land development project; the operation
and maintenance of which will be funded by this assessment district. All parcels of real property
included within the District are described in detail on maps on file in the Riverside County Assessor’s
office or by a tract and parcel number legal description.
The 1972 Act provides for areas within a district to be classified into different zones. Annexation No.
89 to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 is comprised of one zone. The costs of the
installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of the various improvements and facilities within
this zone, will be separately determined, and incidental costs will be prorated and added to determine
the total cost. This zone is comprised of Assessor’s Parcel Number 436-450-019 (Kirby Village) and
is designated as “Zone 89”. Future annexations will be assigned zone designations e.g. Zone 90,
Zone 91, Zone 91A, Zone 92, etc., as appropriate.
3.2 Description of Improvements and Services
The authorized facilities and items of servicing and maintenance are described in the “Master
Engineer’s Report.” Said description is included within this report by reference. A copy of said “Master
Engineer’s Report” is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto and may be
reviewed,or a copy obtained, at City Hall during normal business hours.
The improvements included in Zone 89 to be installed, operated, serviced, and maintained are street
lighting and traffic signals; parkway landscaping; trees; sidewalks, curb and gutter, and storm drains
(catch basins and pipe in public right-of-way or easement). Also included is the servicing and
maintenance required for graffiti removal.
These improvements are located within the street public right-of-ways and dedicated public
easements which are within the boundaries of the District and as such are of special benefit to the
parcels. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, turf, ground cover, shrubs and
trees, sprinkler and irrigation systems, drainage systems, and associated appurtenances. Services
include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs
associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a
healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. The breakdown of maintained improvements is as
follows:
One street light directly in front of Annexation No. 89 on Kirby Street.In addition
to two shared street lights across Kirby Street.
Traffic Signal at the corner of Kirby Street and Esplanade Avenue.
Varied width landscaped parkway along Kirby Street with five trees.
Storm Drains and Catch Basins in public right of way.
Sidewalk and Curb and Gutter improvements adjacent to Kirby Street.
PACKET PAGE: 61
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Landscape, Lighting, & Park District No. 2 Annexation 89 –City of San Jacinto 4-2
Prepared by NBS –Fiscal Year 2015/16
4.MAP OF IMPROVEMENTS
The map on the following page contains the improvements for Annexation No. 89.
PACKET PAGE: 62
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
CIT Y OF SAN JACINTO
LANDSCAPING , LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2
CIT Y OF SAN JACINTO
LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2
ANNEX ATION NO. 89
Street Lights
Traffic Light
LandscapingPACKET PAGE: 63AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Landscape, Lighting, & Park District No. 2 Annexation 89 –City of San Jacinto 5-1
Prepared by NBS –Fiscal Year 2015/16
5.ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operation, and servicing the improvements as
described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the
assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual
costs are projected for the following fiscal year.
5.1 Budget
Annexation No.89 (Kirby Village)
Description
FY 2015/16
Maximum
Per AU
FY 2015/16
Maximum
Budget
FY 2015/16
Estimated
Actual Per
AU
FY 2015/16
Estimated
Actual
Budget
Street Light and Traffic Signal Maintenance $191.41 $6,890.79 $191.41 $6,890.79
Park Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Landscape Maintenance 66.17 2,382.09 66.17 2,382.09
Storm Drain Maintenance 51.69 1,860.93 51.69 1,860.93
Concrete Maintenance 35.21 1,267.73 35.21 1,267.73
Graffiti Removal 95.23 3,428.11 95.23 3,428.11
General Benefit (104.56)(3,764.31)(104.56)(3,764.31)
Total Assessment $ 335.15 $12,065.34 $ 335.15 $12,065.34
Beginning in the Fiscal Year starting July 1, 2016, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax
roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements
for the upcoming fiscal year.The actual assessment per AU will be based on the total amount of
funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual
assessment amount may be the same or lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however it
may not exceed the maximum after the application of the cost of living inflator, defined in Section 5.7
of this report, unless the excess increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with
Assessment Law.
It is the intent of the City of San Jacinto to establish an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the
estimated costs of maintenance, operation,and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10
of the fiscal year, or whenever the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments
and tax collections from the County, whichever is later.
PACKET PAGE: 64
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Landscape, Lighting, & Park District No. 2 Annexation 89 –City of San Jacinto 6-1
Prepared by NBS –Fiscal Year 2015/16
6.METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
6.1 Introduction
Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIIID, all parcels that receive a special benefit conferred upon
them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified,
and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in
relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Part 2 of Division
15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the
establishment of assessment districts by local agencies for the purpose of providing certain public
improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements.
Section 22573 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments
must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value.This Section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment
district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly
distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in
proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or
parcel from the improvements."
The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from
the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of
1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and
Highways Code, State of California]."
The 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment
district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various
areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574).
Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the
proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned
properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties
receive no special benefit from the assessment. Examples of parcels exempted from the assessment
would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public
courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways.
Furthermore, Proposition 218 requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit,
whereas only special benefit may be assessed.
6.2 General Benefit
Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which
proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special
benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must
next “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred,” and only the special benefits
can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed.
The improvements being financed consist of the maintenance, operation,and servicing of local
improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include street lighting within the public
rights-of-way along Kirby Street. The street lights being installed are adjacent to the property and
while it will benefit motorists driving on Kirby Street the safety and economic benefits received by the
PACKET PAGE: 65
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Landscape, Lighting, & Park District No. 2 Annexation 89 –City of San Jacinto 6-2
Prepared by NBS –Fiscal Year 2015/16
property within the Zone will account for a greater percentage of special benefit.Ten percent of the
light directly outside of the property is attributed to motorist safety related benefits.Of the two street
lights benefiting the property that are across the street from the property,one-half of one of these
lights is outside the Zone and will be funded by other sources.Ninety percent of the other one and a
half lights is attributed to motorist safety and properties across the street.
Based upon this, it has been determined that there is an amount of general benefit to the surrounding
community and the public in general from the maintenance, operation and servicing of the
improvements within the boundaries of the District and therefore a portion of the project costs should
be attributed to general benefit. The general benefit costs are as follows:
Improvement
Total Estimated
Costs
General Benefit
Contribution
Estimated General
Benefit Costs
Street Lights $441.18 63.57%$280.48
Traffic Signal 3,780.00 90.00%3,402.00
Landscape Maintenance 1,384.21 0.00%0.00
Tree Maintenance 75.00 2.00%1.50
Strom Drain Maintenance 1,140.00 2.00%22.80
Concrete Maintenance 776.60 2.00%15.53
Graffiti Removal 2,100.00 2.00%42.00
The landscape maintenance and irrigation water for landscaping in the public right-of-way will be
provided by the property owner. If said property owner fails to properly maintain said public
landscaping, the City will, upon due process, take over the financing of the public landscaping by
adding these items.
6.3 Special Benefit
With the exception of the general benefit described above, the maintenance, operation and servicing
of the local landscaping improvements within the District are for the specific benefit of the properties
within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District.
The net amount to be assessed upon parcels within the Zone in accordance with this report is
apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the amount among all assessable lots or
parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefit to be received by each lot or parcel from the
improvements, namely the maintenance and servicing of public landscaping, lighting and drainage
facilities within the Zone. The maintenance and servicing of public landscaping, lighting,drainage
facilities and street trees installed and constructed in public places in the City of San Jacinto provides
a special benefit which is received by each and every lot or parcel within the Zone. Landscaping and
street trees within the District enhance the aesthetic appeal of parcels within the landscaping and
street tree zones. Such landscaping improves erosion resistance and dust control.The streets within
the District improve access to all lots or parcels assessed. Street lights im prove ingress and egress of
such lots or parcels by illuminating access after sunset. Such street lights, by so improving ingress
and egress, improve the security of such lots or parcels by improving the night time visibility of such
lots or parcels and improve the access of emergency vehicles thereto, and in the case of commercial
lots or parcels, facilitate the opening and operation of business uses after sunset.
PACKET PAGE: 66
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Landscape, Lighting, & Park District No. 2 Annexation 89 –City of San Jacinto 6-3
Prepared by NBS –Fiscal Year 2015/16
Street Landscaping
The overall appeal and safety of an area is enhanced when landscaping improvements are in place
and kept in a healthy and satisfactory condition.Conversely, appeal and safety decreases when
landscaping in overgrown, unsafe or destroyed by the elements or vandalism.
Improved Aesthetics.Street landscaping improvements improve the commercial activity,
appearance and desirability for the property within the boundaries of Annexation No. 89.
Regular maintenance ensures that the improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or
disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to the property adjacent to the improvements.
Increased Safety:Safety for pedestrians involves not only a degree of protection from
vehicular accidents, but also from criminal activity.Well maintained areas mitigate crime,
especially vandalism, and enhance pedestrian safety.
Street trees, median landscaping, hardscaping and appurtenant facilities within and adjacent to City
streets, if well maintained, provide beautification and shade.
Proper maintenance of drainage systems increases safety during periods of heavy rain and prevents
property damage.
The primary benefits of street lighting are for the convenience, safety, security and protection of
property.
1.Improvement to traffic circulation and reduction in night time accidents and attendant human
misery and decrease in personal property loss.
2.The deterrence of crime and the aid to police protection.
3.Promotion of business during nighttime hours.
4.Increased nighttime safety on roads and highways.
5.The improved ability of pedestrians and motorists to see, which helps people safely find their
way.
6.Improved ingress and egress to lots and parcels.
7.Reduction in vandalism and other criminal acts, and reduced damage to improvements.
8.The enhancement to the value of property which results from the foregoing benefits.
All of the above mentioned items for street landscaping, drainage, and lighting improvements provide
special benefit to the property within Annexation No. 89 that are not realized by parcels outside the
boundaries of the Zone.
6.4 Method of Assessment Spread
As discussed above, each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from
the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the
maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit
derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance
and operation of the improvements.The total costs of maintenance, less the amount of general
benefit identified in Section 5.2 of this Report, will be assessed to the parcels within the District based
on the estimated Assessment Units assigned to each parcel.To assess special benefit appropriately,
it is necessary to relate parcels of different land uses and development status to each other. The AU
method of apportionment uses the single family home as the basic unit of assessment.There are
eight lots that are planned as open space and/or streets and do not receive benefit. These are listed
with a “letter” in the assessment roll.The following shows how each parcel’s AUs have been
determined:
PACKET PAGE: 67
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Landscape, Lighting, & Park District No. 2 Annexation 89 –City of San Jacinto 6-4
Prepared by NBS –Fiscal Year 2015/16
6.5 Assessment Formula
The basic formula used to calculate the amount spread to each lot or parcel within the District for
each type of improvement or facility starts with an AU. The basic AU is given a value of one (1) for a
single-family residential parcel. From this base, the remaining parcels are related according to their
equivalent special benefit within a zone or future annexation. The purpose of this formula is to fairly
equate special benefit conferred on property with differing land uses for each type of improvement or
facility within a zone (e.g., single-family residential versus commercial office versus vacant property,
for street lighting).
6.6 Assessment Unit Method
The following table shows the assessment formula for the District using the AU method for common
land uses:
Land Use
Landscaping
Assessment
Formula
Lighting
Assessment
Formula
Park
Assessment
Formula
Graffiti
Removal
Drainage
Assessment
Formula
Churches
0.5 AU per
Assessable
Acre
0.5 AU per
Assessable
Acre
0.5 AU per
Assessable
Acre
0.5 AU per
Assessable
Acre
0.5 AU per
Assessable
Acre
Commercial/
Industrial
3.0 AU per
Assessable
Acre
3.0 AU per
Assessable
Acre
3.0 AU per
Assessable
Acre
3.0 AU per
Assessable
Acre
3.0 AU per
Assessable
Acre
Residential
Single Family
1.0 AU per
Residential Unit
1.0 AU per
Residential Unit
1.0 AU per
Residential Unit
1.0 AU per
Residential Unit
1.0 AU per
Residential
Unit
Apartments 0.6 AU per
Parcel
0.6 AU per
Parcel
0.6 AU per
Parcel
0.6 AU per
Parcel
0.6 AU per
Parcel
Public
Schools
0.0 AU per
Parcel
0.5 AU per
Assessable
Acre
0.0 AU per
Parcel
0.5 AU per
Assessable
Acre
0.5 AU per
Assessable
Acre
6.7 Cost of Living Inflator
Each fiscal year beginning Fiscal Year 2016/17, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be
increased by the percent change in the January to January Consumer Price Index for all Urban
Consumers for the Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside area, published by the United States Department
of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics; provided however, that any such annual increase shall not
exceed seven and one-half percent (7.5%).
If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not
be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as
computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment
cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such
that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that
year.
PACKET PAGE: 68
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Landscape, Lighting, & Park District No. 2 Annexation 89 –City of San Jacinto 7-1
Prepared by NBS –Fiscal Year 2015/16
7.ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The assessment diagram is provided in Exhibit “A” of this report.The lines and dimensions shown on
maps of the County Assessor for the current year are incorporated by reference herein and made part
of this report.
PACKET PAGE: 69
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
PACKET PAGE: 70AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Landscape, Lighting, & Park District No. 2 Annexation 89 –City of San Jacinto 8-1
Prepared by NBS –Fiscal Year 2015/16
8.ASSESSMENT ROLL
The assessment roll is provided in Exhibit “B” of this report.The description of each lot or parcel as
part of the records of the County Assessor are by reference made part of this Report.
PACKET PAGE: 71
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Parcel Proposed Asmt.Storm Dollars Assessment
Identification Property Owner Name Land Use Acreage Units Street Lights Landscape Drain Concrete Graffiti per AU/per Parcel
(Lot Number)Code (acres)(AU)Maint.Maint.Maint.Removal Parcel ($)($)
Lot 1 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 2 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 3 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 4 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 5 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 6 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 7 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 8 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 9 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 10 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 11 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 12 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 13 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 14 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 15 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 16 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 17 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 18 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 19 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 20 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 21 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 22 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 23 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 24 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 25 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 26 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 27 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 28 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 29 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 30 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 31 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 32 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 33 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 34 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 35 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot 36 Brosh SoCal Properties R1 n/a 1.00 $89.12 $66.13 $51.06 $34.78 $94.06 $335.15 $335.15
Lot A Brosh SoCal Properties n/a n/a 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Lot B Brosh SoCal Properties n/a n/a 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Lot C Brosh SoCal Properties n/a n/a 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Lot D Brosh SoCal Properties n/a n/a 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Lot E Brosh SoCal Properties n/a n/a 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Lot F Brosh SoCal Properties n/a n/a 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Lot G Brosh SoCal Properties n/a n/a 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Lot H Brosh SoCal Properties n/a n/a 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
36.00 $3,208.31 $2,380.58 $1,838.13 $1,252.20 $3,386.11 $12,065.34
(36 Residential Lots)
TRACT No. 34586 Totals
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2
Annexation No. 89
(Zone 89)
ASSESSMENT ROLL
TRACT No. 34586
PACKET PAGE: 72
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Page 1 of 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO: 3537
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR
THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY (KIRBY VILLAGE,
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 436-450-019) TO
LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2
(LLPD NO.2) OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO (LLPD NO. 2,
ANNEXATION NO. 89)
WHEREAS, on September 16, 2014, the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto ("City Council"), adopted Resolution No. 3533 initiating proceedings for
the annexation of property to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 of
the City of San Jacinto ("District") and ordered NBS, the Assessment Engineer
of Record, to prepare and file a report in accordance with Section 22565 of the
California Streets and Highways Code ("Code"); and
WHEREAS, the Engineer of Record has filed with the City Clerk its report
("Engineer's Report") containing the matters specified in Section 22565 through
22574 of the Code; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer's Report has been duly presented by the City
Clerk to the City Council for consideration and has been fully considered by
the City Council, and this City Council finds that each and every part of the
Engineer's Report is sufficient, and that no portion of the report requires or
should be modified in any respect.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED determined and ordered by
the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, as follows:
SECTION 1: The Engineer's estimate of the itemized costs and
expenses of the installation, operation, maintenance
and/or servicing of street lights, traffic signals, graffiti
removal, landscaping, drainage facilities and any
improvements appurtenant thereto and the incidental
expenses in connection therewith, contained in the
Engineer's Report shall be, and each of them are
hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed.
SECTION 2: The diagrams showing the property proposed to be
annexed to the District referred to and described in the
Engineer's Report and the boundaries of the property
proposed to be annexed to said District as the same
PACKET PAGE: 73
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Page 2 of 2
existed at the time of passage of Resolution No. 3533,
are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed.
SECTION 3: The proposed assessments upon the property proposed
to be annexed to the District are in proportion to the
estimated benefit to be received by said property,
respectively, from said improvements and of the
incidental expenses thereof, as contained in the
Engineer's Report.
SECTION 4: Said Report shall stand as the Engineer's Report for the
purposes of all subsequent proceedings for Annexation
No. 89 to the District.
SECTION 5: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City
Clerk shall attest and certify to the passage and
adoption thereof.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this __ day of _____, 201_, by the
following vote:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Abstained:
City of San Jacinto
__________________________
by Alonso Ledezma, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Rick Miller, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Best, Best & Krieger, LLP
___________________________
City Attorney, City of San Jacinto
PACKET PAGE: 74
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Page 1 of 5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO: 3538
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY (KIRBY
VILLAGE, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 436-450-019) TO
LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2 (LLPD NO.2)
AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 (LLPD
NO. 2, ANNEXATION NO. 89)
WHEREAS, on September 16, 2014, the City Council ("City Council") of the
City of San Jacinto ("City") adopted Resolution No. 3533 declaring its intention to
annex certain territory to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2
("Assessment District"), which was designated for purposes of such proceedings
as "Annexation No. 89" and "Zone 89," and scheduling a public hearing thereon;
and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 3533, the City Council approved the report
of NBS, the Engineer of Record ("Report") which contained, among other matters,
the proposed assessments to be levied for fiscal year 2015-16 upon assessable
lots and parcels of land within the territory which comprises Annexation No. 89 to and
Zone 89 of the Assessment District; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 53753 of the Government Code, notice of
the proposed annexation and the proposed assessments and of the time and place
of the public hearing thereon was mailed to the record owner of each parcel of
property identified in the Report and further directed that each such mailed notice
contain an assessment ballot upon which the property owner could indicate his or
her support or opposition to the proposed assessments; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted the public hearing with
respect to the annexation of the territory proposed to be annexed to the
Assessment District and has received a report from the City Clerk regarding the
tabulation of the assessment ballots submitted, and not withdrawn, in support of or
opposition to the proposed assessments advising that the ballots which were
received were voted in favor of the proposed assessments and that a majority
protest does not therefore exist; and
PACKET PAGE: 75
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Page 2 of 5
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined and ordered by the
City Council of the City of San Jacinto as follows:
Section 1: Findings. The findings recited in the preceding paragraphs are
true and correct.
Section 2: Assessment District. The Assessment District is Landscaping,
Lighting and Park District No. 2 of the City of San Jacinto. The
territory which is proposed to be annexed to the Assessment
District and which comprises Annexation No. 89 is described in
the Report and is identified by Riverside County Assessor's
Parcel Number: 436-450-019 in the City of San Jacinto, County
of Riverside.
Section 3: Improvements. The Improvements which shall be provided for the
property proposed to be annexed to the District by and through
the assessments levied annually thereon shall include the
following:
(a) The installation or construction or operation of public
lighting, facilities, including, but not limited to, street lights,
and traffic signals;
(b) The installation or planting of landscaping, including, but
not limited to, street trees, and parkways;
(c) The installation or construction of sidewalks, curb and
gutter, storm drains, and catch basins;
(d) The installation or construction of any facilities which are
appurtenant to any improvements listed in (a) through (c)
or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance
or servicing thereof including, but not limited to, irrigation,
drainage, and electrical facilities; and
(e) The maintenance and servicing of any of the foregoing.
Section 4: Annexation; Designation of Zone; Detachment. The territory
comprising Annexation No. 89, as described in Section 2
hereof, is annexed to Landscaping, Lighting and Park District
No. 2 of the City of San Jacinto. The diagram of the Assessment
District, as modified to include Annexation No. 89 and as
contained in the Report, is confirmed. Such annexed territory is
designated as Zone 89 of the Assessment District. The territory
comprising Annexation No. 89 and Zone 89 of the Assessment
District shall be and is detached from Landscaping, Lighting and
Park District No. 1 of the City of San Jacinto.
PACKET PAGE: 76
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Page 3 of 5
Section 5: Levy of Assessments; Annual Increases; Duration. The
assessments proposed to be levied on the lots and parcels
within Zone 89 of the Assessment District for Fiscal Year 2015-
16 in the amounts set forth in the Report and in the
assessment ballot mailed to and returned by the owners of the
property comprising Annexation No. 89 shall be and are
confirmed and levied. Pursuant to Section 6 of Resolution No.
3353, and as specified in such ballot, the annual amount of the
assessment to be levied on each parcel of property in Zone 89
of the Assessment District shall be subject to an annual
adjustment or increase in an amount equal to the percentage
increase in the Consumer Price Index-All Urban Consumers for
Los Angeles - Anaheim - Riverside Area; provided, however,
that the amount of the assessment to be levied on any parcel in
any fiscal year shall not be increased by more than seven and
one-half percent (7.5%) and the amount of the assessment to be
levied on any parcel in any fiscal year shall not, in any event,
exceed the actual total cost of the proportional special benefit
conferred on that parcel. The assessments shall be levied
annually on assessable lots and parcels of property in Zone 89
so long as the assessments are necessary to finance the cost of
the operation, maintenance and servicing of the improvements
specified in Section 3 within and for Zone 89.
Section 6: Filing With the County Auditor. The City Clerk shall cause the
diagram and assessment as confirmed and levied hereby to be
filed with the County Auditor of the County of Riverside as
required by Section 22641 of the Streets and Highways Code.
Section 7: That the Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk
shall attest and certify to the passage and adoption thereof.
PACKET PAGE: 77
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Page 4 of 5
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this __ day of ______, 201_, by the
following vote:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Abstained:
City of San Jacinto
__________________________
by Alonso Ledezma, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Rick Miller, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Best, Best & Krieger, LLP
___________________________
City Attorney, City of San Jacinto
PACKET PAGE: 78
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Page 5 of 5
Certificate of Tabulation Official
and
Statement of Assessment Ballots Submitted
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
The undersigned, the duly authorized tabulation official appointed by the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Article XIII D of the Constitution of the
State of California and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750
and following), I did tabulate the assessment ballots timely submitted and not withdrawn in the assessment
ballot proceedings pertaining to City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 (LLPD No.
2), Annexation No. 89.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement of Assessment Ballots Received shows the assessment ballots
submitted, and not withdrawn, in favor of the proposed assessment and the assessment ballots submitted,
and not withdrawn, in opposition to the proposed assessment, each total weighted according to the financial
obligation of the affected properties for which the assessment ballots were submitted.
Total assessment ballots distributed
Total assessment ballots received
Total assessment ballots invalidated
Assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed assessment:
Weighted value of assessment ballots received in favor of the
proposed assessment
Percent of assessment ballots received in favor of the proposed
assessment
Assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed
assessment:
Weighted value of assessment ballots received in opposition to the
proposed assessment
Percent of assessment ballots received in opposition to the proposed
assessment
This certification is executed this day of , 2014 in ___________________, California.
By:
Title:
PACKET PAGE: 79
AGENDA ITEM 4.1
Page 1
October 21, 2014
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Tim Hults, City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 3539 / expressing the City Council’s intent to commit a set
percentage of UUT proceeds to Public Safety Services.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, adopt Resolution No. 3539
committing a set percentage of the proceeds of the UUT to public safety services.
DISCUSSION:
On August 5, 2014, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto called a General
Municipal Tax Election to be held on November 4, 2014, for the purpose of submitting to
the voters the question of whether to adopt an ordinance adding Chapter 3.22 to the
San Jacinto Municipal Code, which would enact a maximum of a six and one-half
percent (6.5%) utility users tax (“UUT”) on utility usage within the City for a period of ten
(10) years.
Pursuant to Section 3.22.010 of the proposed UUT ordinance, the UUT is a general tax
enacted solely to raise revenue for the general governmental purposes of the City and
all of the proceeds from the tax shall be placed in the City's general fund. The general
fund pays for essential City services such as police, fire and paramedic services,
community center and recreation services, street operations and maintenance, and
general municipal services to the public. However, the City’s annual public safety
expenditures (estimated at $12.8 million for FY 14/15) exceed the annual revenue from
the four main sources that make up the City’s general fund revenues (estimated at $9.2
million, 81% of total revenues of $11.3 million for FY 14/15). As such, dedicating a
percentage of the UUT proceeds to public safety services would eliminate this
imbalance.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Should the voters enact the UUT, the proceeds are expected to generate in excess of
$5 million annually. Dedicating a set percentage of the proceeds would allow the City to
preserve and even expand [public safety services.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 3539
PACKET PAGE: 81
AGENDA ITEM 5.1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO. 3539
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA EXPRESSING ITS INTENT TO COMMIT A
CERTAIN PERCENTAGE OF UTILITY USERS TAX (UUT) REVENUE
FOR PUBLIC SAFETY PURPOSES.
WHEREAS, on August 5, 2014, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto called a
General Municipal Tax Election to be held on November 4, 2014, for the purpose of
submitting to the voters the question of whether to adopt an ordinance adding Chapter
3.22 to the San Jacinto Municipal Code, which would enact a six and one-half percent
(6.5%) utility users tax (“UUT”) on utility usage within the City for a period of ten (10)
years; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3.22.010 of the proposed UUT ordinance, the
UUT is a general tax enacted solely to raise revenue for the general governmental
purposes of the City and all of the proceeds from the tax shall be placed in the City's
general fund and used for the usual current expenses of the City; and
WHEREAS, the general fund pays for essential City services such as police, fire
and paramedic services, community center and recreation services, street operations
and maintenance, and general municipal services to the public; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt this resolution expressing this City
Council’s intent, if the UUT is enacted by the voters, to commit to spend a certain
percentage of future UUT revenue for public safety purposes.
.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findings. The City Council finds that all of the preceding recitals
are true and correct.
Section 2. Commitment to Spending UUT Revenue. The City Council
hereby expresses its intent, if the UUT is enacted by the voters, to spend the following
percentages of future UUT revenue for the following purposes:
A. Public Safety: Eight-five percent (85%) of future UUT revenue
shall be spent on the costs of providing public safety services, consisting of: police
patrol, response, investigation, apprehension and law enforcement, emergency 9-1-1-
response, fire prevention and suppression services, paramedic services, and
ambulance services.
PACKET PAGE: 83
AGENDA ITEM 5.1
2
Section 3. UUT Not Deemed a Special Tax. The adoption of this Resolution
shall not be construed, and it is not the City Council’s intent, to convert the proposed
UUT into a “special tax”, as that term is defined Article XIIIC §1(d) of the California
Constitution, or California Government Code §§ 53721 and 53724, or any combination
thereof. Although this Resolution expresses the intent of the current City Council to
spend future UUT revenues for certain purposes, this Resolution is non-binding on any
future or subsequently constituted City Council, and the UUT shall remain a “general
tax” as that term is defined in Article XIIIC §1(a) of the California Constitution, and as
set forth in Section 3.22.010 of the proposed UUT ordinance.
Section 4. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of October, 2014, by the
following vote:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Abstain:
City of San Jacinto
_____________________________
By: Alonso Ledezma, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________
Rick Miller, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Best Best & Krieger LLP
_____________________________
Jeffrey S. Ballinger, City Attorney
PACKET PAGE: 84
AGENDA ITEM 5.1
3
I, _________________, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution is the actual resolution duly and regularly adopted by the
City Council at a regular meeting on the 21st day of October, 2014, by the following vote
to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
_____________________________
City Clerk
PACKET PAGE: 85
AGENDA ITEM 5.1
October 21, 2014
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Tim Hults, City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 3540 / establishing a DUI Emergency Response Cost
Recovery Program (“Program”) to hold persons driving impaired by
alcohol, drugs, or both financially accountable for their actions by
recovering emergency response expenses.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council, by motion, adopt Resolution No. 3540
establishing a DUI Emergency Response Cost Recovery Program (“Program”).
DISCUSSION:
California Government Code section 53150 et seq. allows the City to recover costs
incurred for each motor vehicle incident resulting in an emergency response due to the
intentional wrongful conduct or negligent operation of a motor vehicle by a person under
the influence of alcohol, drugs, or both. As such, by adoption of the attached resolution,
the City will seek the recovery of reasonable and appropriate emergency response
costs incurred by the Police and Fire Departments arising from such incidents.
Government Code section 53156(a) defines “expense of an emergency response” as
the “reasonable costs incurred by a public agency in reasonably making an appropriate
emergency response to the incident.” Reasonable costs include the costs of providing
police, firefighting, rescue, and emergency medical services at the scene of the incident,
as well as the salaries of the personnel responding to the incident. Emergency
response expenses also include removing vehicles, investigating the cause of the
incident, conducting field sobriety tests, and if appropriate, arresting and detaining the
subject. These costs may also include time spent booking the suspect, writing reports,
as well as the cost of materials. Emergency response expenses are intended to be in
addition to any other liability, fines, or fees that are imposed by law.
The cost recovery process would require that the City calculate the costs incurred in an
emergency response for such incidents. The City would then prepare an invoice and a
letter to the person(s) causing the incident seeking recovery of the emergency response
PACKET PAGE: 87
AGENDA ITEM 5.2
costs necessitated by the incident as reflected on a “Cost Recovery Statement” for the
incident.
The Cost Recovery Statement shall include the costs of providing police, firefighting,
rescue, and emergency medical services at the scene of the incident, as well as the
salaries of the personnel responding to the incident. The Cost Recovery Statement
shall also include the costs of removing vehicles, investigating the cause of the incident,
conducting field sobriety tests, arresting and detaining the suspect, booking the suspect,
writing reports, and the cost of materials.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Chief of Police is charged with establishing the amount of the Cost Recovery
Statement for each incident. The maximum that can be invoiced per incident is twelve
thousand dollars ($12,000). From October 2013 to September 2014, the City
experienced 28 incidents that would be applicable, for a maximum recovery of about
$336,000.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution No. 3540
PACKET PAGE: 88
AGENDA ITEM 5.2
24438.00000\9090111.1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO. 3540
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A DUI
EMERGENCY RESPONSE COST RECOVERY PROGRAM
FOR MOTOR VEHICLE INCIDENTS CAUSED BY
PERSONS DRIVING WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF
ALCOHOL, DRUGS, OR BOTH
WHEREAS, Government Code section 53150 et seq. authorizes public agencies
to recover emergency response expenses from any person whose intentional wrongful
conduct or negligent conduct causes a motor vehicle incident resulting in an appropriate
emergency response; and
WHEREAS, Government Code section 53156(a) defines “expense of an
emergency response” as the “reasonable costs incurred by a public agency in
reasonably making an appropriate emergency response to the incident.” Reasonable
costs include the costs of providing police, firefighting, rescue, and emergency medical
services at the scene of the incident, as well as the salaries of the personnel responding
to the incident; and
WHEREAS, emergency response expenses also include removing vehicles,
investigating the cause of the incident, conducting field sobriety tests, and if appropriate,
arresting and detaining the subject. These costs may also include time spent booking
the suspect, writing reports, as well as the cost of materials. (California Highway Patrol
v. Superior Court, (2006) 135 Cal. App. 4th 488, 508-09 (Cal. App. 1st Dist.); and
WHEREAS, emergency response expenses authorized under Government Code
section 53150 are intended to be in addition to, and not in limitation of, any other
liability, fines, or fees that are imposed by law; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto, through a contract with the County of
Riverside, provides police, fire protection, and emergency medical response services for
traffic collisions caused by individuals under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or both; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to establish a DUI Emergency Response Cost
Recovery Program (“Program”) to hold persons driving impaired by alcohol, drugs, or
both financially accountable for their actions by recovering emergency response
expenses.
PACKET PAGE: 89
AGENDA ITEM 5.2
Page 2
24438.00000\9090111.1
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, finds that
the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby approves and adopts the DUI Emergency
Response Cost Recovery Program (“Program”).
SECTION 3. Pursuant to the adoption of the Program, the City may recover the
reasonable costs incurred in making an appropriate emergency response to incidents
involving persons(s) who are driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or both.
SECTION 4. The City shall calculate the reasonable costs incurred in making
an appropriate emergency response for each incident involving person(s) who are
driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or both. The City shall prepare an invoice
and letter to the person(s) causing the incident seeking recovery of the emergency
response costs necessitated by the incident as reflected on the Cost Recovery
Statement for the incident.
SECTION 5. The Cost Recovery Statement shall include the costs of providing
police, firefighting, rescue, and emergency medical services at the scene of the incident,
as well as the salaries of the personnel responding to the incident. The Cost Recovery
Statement shall also include the costs of removing vehicles, investigating the cause of
the incident, conducting field sobriety tests, arresting and detaining the suspect, booking
the suspect, writing reports, and the cost of materials.
SECTION 6. The City Council hereby authorizes the Chief of Police, or his or
her designee, to implement the Program and recover the costs reflected on a Cost
Recovery Statement for deposit into the General Fund.
SECTION 7. The City Council hereby authorizes the Chief of Police, or his or
her designee, to establish the amount of the Cost Recovery Statement for each
incident, which shall not exceed twelve thousand dollars ($12,000) for any one incident.
SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _____ day of _______________,
2014.
________________________________
Alonso Ledezma, Mayor
PACKET PAGE: 90
AGENDA ITEM 5.2
Page 3
24438.00000\9090111.1
ATTEST:
______________________________
Richard Miller, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BEST BEST & KRIEGER, LLP
_______________________________
Jeffrey S. Ballinger, City Attorney
PACKET PAGE: 91
AGENDA ITEM 5.2
Page 4
24438.00000\9090111.1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) RESOLUTION NO. _____
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
I, Rick Miller, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
_____ day of _______________, 2014, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Richard Miller, City Clerk
PACKET PAGE: 92
AGENDA ITEM 5.2