HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 11/20/2018
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2018
5:30 PM CLOSED SESSION
6:30 PM OPEN SESSION
COMMUNITY CENTER
625 S. PICO AVENUE
SAN JACINTO, CA 92583
951-487-7339
City of San Jacinto Page 1 Updated 11/15/2018 3:56 PM
CRYSTAL RUIZ, MAYOR
RUSS UTZ, MAYOR PRO TEM
ANDREW KOTYUK, COUNCILMEMBER
ALONSO LEDEZMA, COUNCILMEMBER
SCOTT MILLER, COUNCILMEMBER
1. ORGANIZATION
1.1. Public Comments on Closed Session Items
1.2. Closed Session
1.2.1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: Existing litigation pursuant to
Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1), People of the State of California et al. v.
Holy Ministry of the Blessed Sacrament et al. (Riverside County Superior Court,
case number RIC1815910)
1.3. Closed Session Report
1.4. Roll Call
1.5. Invocation - Pastor Steve Kalmikov, 412 Church
1.6. Pledge of Allegiance - Councilman Scott Miller
1.7. Special Presentation(s)
1.7.1. Division Chief Bill Weiser: Auto Pulse Presentation
1.7.2. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Go Human
Presentation - Rene Yarnall, Community Development Manager
1.8. Mayor / Council Member Reports / Discussions
1.9. Late Items
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
City of San Jacinto Page 2 Updated 11/15/2018 3:56 PM
3. JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS
3.A. Consent Calendar - City Council
3.A.1. Waiver of Full Reading of Ordinance(s), and Reading by Title Only
3.A.2. Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that City Council approve the draft minutes of the
November 6, 2018 Regular City Council meeting.
Department: City Clerk
3.A.3. Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council review and approve Warrants and
Disbursements for the period of October 1 - 31, 2018 in the amount of $
2,795,003.10.
Department: Finance
3.A.4. Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street to San Jacinto Avenue)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that City Council adopts the enclosed speed survey
prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc.
Department: Engineering
3.A.5. Approval of Maintenance Worker II Position
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council Authorize the City Manager to create
a Maintenance Worker II position.
Department: City Manager
3.B. Consent Calendar - Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
San Jacinto
4. DISCUSSION ITEMS
4.1. Contract Award - General Plan 2040
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with De Novo Planning Group for
preparation of the San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update and Programmatic
Environmental Impact Report in an amount not to exceed $1,100,000 from CIP
Project #18-006.
City of San Jacinto Page 3 Updated 11/15/2018 3:56 PM
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement in
substantially the form attached hereto, subject to review by the City Attorney.
Department: Community Development
5. CITY MANAGER UPDATE
6. FUTURE REQUESTS FROM CITY COUNCIL TO STAFF
7. ADJOURNMENT
DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OPEN SESSION AGENDAS (SB343) - Any public record, relating to an
open session agenda item, that is distributed within 72 hours prior to the meeting is available for public
inspection at the public counter located in the Administration Building of City Hall, 595 S. San Jacinto
Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92583.
I, Angela Walton, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that I caused to be posted the
foregoing agenda this 15th day of November 2018 as requested by law.
Angela Walton, City Clerk
November 20, 2018
TO: City Council
REQUESTED BY: Angela Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY: Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that City Council approve the draft minutes of the November 6, 2018 Regular
City Council meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
11-6-18 Regular Action Minutes
3.A.2
Packet Pg. 4
ACTION MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL – REGULAR MEETING
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2018
6:30 PM OPEN SESSION
SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY CENTER
625 S. PICO AVE
SAN JACINTO, CA 92583
951-487-7339
TELECONFERENCE LOCATION FOR COUNCILMAN SCOTT MILLER
18 SHALDAG, AKKO, ISRAEL
1. ORGANIZATION
Mayor Crystal Ruiz called the meeting to order at 6:31 pm
1.1 Roll Call
City Clerk Angela Walton conducted the roll call:
Present: Ledezma, Miller (by teleconference), Utz, Ruiz
Absent: Kotyuk
M/S/C (Utz/Ledezma) moved to excuse the absence of Councilman Kotyuk. Motion carried 4/0.
Ayes: Ledezma, Miller, Utz, Ruiz
Nays: None
Absent: Kotyuk
Abstain: None
1.2 Invocation
Pastor Guy Boyer of Valley Community Church gave the invocation.
1.3 Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Pro Tem Utz.
CRYSTAL RUIZ, MAYOR
RUSS UTZ, MAYOR PRO TEM
ANDREW KOTYUK, COUNCILMEMBER
ALONSO LEDEZMA COUNCILMEMBER
SCOTT MILLER, COUNCILMEMBER
3.A.2.a
Packet Pg. 5 Attachment: 11-6-18 Regular Action Minutes (Minutes)
1.4 Special Presentation(s)
City Council recognized outgoing Planning Commissioner Jesse Martinez with a
plaque for his years of service on Planning Commission.
1.5 Mayor/Council Member Reports / Discussions
Councilmembers provided their reports.
1.6 Late Items
Mayor Ruiz presented Sonia Ramos of Boxing for Christ and J.R. Tofte of Veterans Day
Out with letters from President Donald Trump recognizing their community efforts.
Councilman Miller left the teleconference call at this time.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Public Speakers:
Corinna Moreno
Alishia Falcon
3. JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS
City Council Consent Calendar Item 3.A and Successor Agency Item 3.B Consent
Calendars were heard concurrently.
3.A Consent Calendar – City Council
3.A.1. Waiver of Full Reading of Ordinance(s), and Reading b y Title Onl y
3.A.2. Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting held on October 16, 2018
3.A.3. Treasurer’s Report at September 30, 2018
3.A.4. Second Reading of Ordinance18-07: Rancho Estudillo Plaza
3.A.5 Second Reading of Ordinance18-08: River Springs Charter School
3.A.6 Esplanade Avenue Widening Phase 1
3.B Consent Calendar – Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of San Jacinto
M/S/C (Ledezma/Utz) moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 3/0.
Ayes: Ledezma, Utz, Ruiz
Nays: None
3.A.2.a
Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: 11-6-18 Regular Action Minutes (Minutes)
Absent: Kotyuk, Miller
Abstain: None
4. DISCUSSION ITEMS
4.1 Lake Park Well Rehabilitation
Water Superintendent Arthur Mullen provided a brief PowerPoint presentation on
this project.
M/S/C (Ledezma/Utz) moved to approve the rehabilitation of Lake Park Well. Motion carried
3/0.
Ayes: Ledezma, Utz, Ruiz
Nays: None
Absent: Kotyuk, Miller
Abstain: None
5. FUTURE REQUESTS FROM CITY COUNCIL TO STAFF
Mayor Pro Tem Utz requested that control of the city-owned billboards on
Sanderson and Ramona is given to staff. Mayor Ruiz asked for this item to
come back to Council for discussion at a future meeting.
Councilman Ledezma thanked City Manager Johnson and City staff for the
paving job on Sanderson.
6. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business before the City Council, Mayor Ruiz adjourned the Regular
Meeting of the City Council at 7:39 pm.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO:
____________________
Crystal Ruiz, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Angela Walton, City Clerk
Approved as read: ______
Approved as amended ____
3.A.2.a
Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: 11-6-18 Regular Action Minutes (Minutes)
November 20, 2018
TO: City Council
REQUESTED BY: Tom Prill, Finance Director
APPROVED BY: Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council review and approve Warrants and Disbursements for the
period of October 1 - 31, 2018 in the amount of $ 2,795,003.10.
DISCUSSION:
The City Council in its oversight role formally reviews disbursements of City funds made by
Accounts Payable warrants, bi-weekly payrolls and electronic funds (wire) transfers. The
following information is provided for such review and approval:
Warrants/Wire Pay Date Amount
Accounts Payable: # 122969-123260 Various $ 1,172,065.07
Payroll: Pay Period # 21 # 23046-23053 10/11/2018 $ 137,645.23
Includes Warrants, Direct Deposits, Taxes, Garnishments
Payroll: Pay Period # 22 # 23054-23061 10/25/2018 $ 137,553.45
Includes Warrants, Direct Deposits, Taxes, Garnishments
Electronic Funds Various $ 1,347,739.35
Total Disbursements – Period of October 1-31, 2018 $ 2,795,003.10
Known Councilmember Conflicts: Kotyuk: Check #s 122984, 123104
Ruiz: Check #s 123050, 123247
Utz: Check # 123255
Prepared by: Judy Kelley, Account Clerk II
Note: Payroll information is on file in the Finance Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Expenditures by warrant, payroll direct deposit and electronic funds (wire) transfers have been
appropriated.
ATTACHMENTS:
Warrant Register October 31, 2018
3.A.3
Packet Pg. 8
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 1Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total12296910/5/2018Aarvig & associates, apc33722Claim js1701020-2200-419.30-902,278.303,283.2633726Claim js1713020-2200-419.30-901,004.9612297010/5/2018Abm janitorial services12622700Janitorial july 2018010-3100-431.34-052,073.652,073.6512297110/5/2018Albert a. webb associates, inc.183885Prof services thru 082518199-9999-425.40-013,760.004,210.00183829Prof services thru 082518010-9600-960.30-90450.0012297210/5/2018Albert haverstick10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2013.3213.3212297310/5/2018Ali rahman10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2023.0823.0812297410/5/2018American forensic nurses, inc.71042Blood draw010-3100-431.34-0546.70566.707126512 blood draws 1 urine sp010-3100-431.34-05520.0012297510/5/2018Anady's trophies, inc.1079838x10 plaque j martinez010-3100-431.21-1054.3854.3812297610/5/2018Anthony sahagun10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2018.0918.0912297710/5/2018Avaya32454772Ip office017-2290-418.40-45580.99580.9912297810/5/2018Bcc benefit coordinators corp5047Group eia00093 sept 2018085-0000-202.21-462,975.863,151.625047Group eia00093 sept 2018085-0000-202.21-52175.7612297910/5/2018Best best & krieger, llp091818Total rda186-1111-411.30-903,094.0051,268.21091818Total general fund010-1111-411.30-9037,405.40091818Total water fund050-9000-450.30-9066.00091818Total econ dev010-1111-411.30-90996.21091818Comc 17-01, 17-05, 17-07011-1700-417.30-90360.00091818Total agreement048-1400-414.30-90392.00091818Full capture test unrecov010-4140-410.34-063,410.63091818Well site acquisition050-9000-450.30-9066.00091818Da 16-3 tract 32247065-0000-211.21-20288.00091818Sa am #2 tract 31886065-0000-211.21-312,397.97091818Total agreement199-9999-425.40-01198.00091818Total agreement199-9999-425.40-012,594.0012298010/5/2018Bio-tox laboratories, inc.36131Analysis010-3100-431.34-051,293.003,201.0036132Analysis010-3100-431.34-05456.0036185Analysis010-3100-431.34-0539.0036420Analysis010-3100-431.34-05962.0036421Analysis010-3100-431.34-05451.003.A.3.aPacket Pg. 9Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 2Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total12298110/5/2018Brian reaves10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-2035.4035.4012298210/5/2018Calpers supplemental income plansREQUEST 092718Sip #452544 ppe 092318085-0000-202.21-292,481.852,914.30REQUEST 092718Sip #452544 ppe 092318085-0000-202.21-28432.4512298310/5/2018Carlos murillo10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-205.025.0212298410/5/2018Central county united wayREQUEST 092718United way contr sept2018085-0000-202.21-8052.0052.0012298510/5/2018Cesar escobar10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2028.9228.9212298610/5/2018Christina philon10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2016.8516.8512298710/5/2018Cindra mccarty10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-2013.2313.2312298810/5/2018Circle of safe-t, inc.661Sart exam010-3100-431.30-901,100.001,100.0012298910/5/2018Corky's pest control, inc.1779756Pc1x dead animal removal010-3100-431.34-0575.0075.0012299010/5/2018Crime scene cleaners20180711Clean up 901 w esplanade010-3100-431.34-05750.00750.0012299110/5/2018Cynthia montoya-estrada10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2079.2579.2512299210/5/2018Cynthia o stewart10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-202.752.7512299310/5/2018D r horton10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2071.6371.6312299410/5/2018Darren mannion10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-2010.1810.1812299510/5/2018Dave's hauling9112018Secured 559 s san jacinto199-9999-425.40-01350.001,700.009132018Secured 1612 s santa fe010-3320-431.34-051,000.009182018ABasin clean up346-8831-500.34-05100.009182018BBasin clean up306-8831-500.34-05100.009192018Basin clean up326-8831-500.34-05150.0012299610/5/2018Debbie flournoy10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2023.2623.2612299710/5/2018Dominica a albrite10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2010.5410.5412299810/5/2018Drew bernard10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-2044.3144.3112299910/5/2018Eastern municipal water districtREQUEST 100118Water services010-7100-410.35-1029.9656,301.15REQUEST 100118Water services025-7100-410.35-105,554.76REQUEST 100118Water services025-7250-410.35-101,298.62REQUEST 100118Water services025-7251-410.35-103,228.60REQUEST 100118Water services025-7252-410.35-1062.98REQUEST 100118Water services055-4170-450.35-1052.25REQUEST 100118Water services034-3200-431.35-10267.54REQUEST 100118Water services301-8831-500.35-105,158.243.A.3.aPacket Pg. 10Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 3Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total122999...10/5/2018...Eastern municipal water district...REQUEST 100118Water services303-8831-500.35-101,276.6556,301.15...REQUEST 100118Water services304-8831-500.35-10138.53REQUEST 100118Water services305-8831-500.35-101,598.64REQUEST 100118Water services306-8831-500.35-101,837.34REQUEST 100118Water services307-8831-500.35-105,230.60REQUEST 100118Water services308-8831-500.35-101,661.73REQUEST 100118Water services310-8831-500.35-10468.80REQUEST 100118Water services311-8831-500.35-103,204.67REQUEST 100118Water services313-8831-500.35-101,720.91REQUEST 100118Water services317-8831-500.35-1032.39REQUEST 100118Water services321-8831-500.35-10908.11REQUEST 100118Water services323-8831-500.35-10319.30REQUEST 100118Water services325-8831-500.35-1017.00REQUEST 100118Water services326-8831-500.35-10766.62REQUEST 100118Water services327-8831-500.35-103,266.36REQUEST 100118Water services331-8831-500.35-10234.72REQUEST 100118Water services332-8831-500.35-101,222.87REQUEST 100118Water services338-8831-500.35-105,177.11REQUEST 100118Water services339-8831-500.35-1037.52REQUEST 100118Water services343-8831-500.35-102,860.66REQUEST 100118Water services345-8831-500.35-10353.24REQUEST 100118Water services346-8831-500.35-10773.12REQUEST 100118Water services351-8831-500.35-101,616.78REQUEST 100118Water services359-8831-500.35-10886.08REQUEST 100118Water services362-8831-500.35-10333.94REQUEST 100118Water services363-8831-500.35-10546.01REQUEST 100118Water services364-8831-500.35-1023.84REQUEST 100118Water services365-8831-500.35-10144.29REQUEST 100118Water services376-8831-500.35-103,990.3712300010/5/2018Esgil corporation0052067-INPlan check fees aug 2018011-3300-431.30-9043,421.0143,421.0112300110/5/2018Eyemed vision care163635937Premium oct 2018085-0000-202.21-35846.84869.57163635937Cobra oct 2018065-0000-201.08-6422.733.A.3.aPacket Pg. 11Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 4Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total12300210/5/2018Fm lock and safe,inc.99934Search warrant010-3100-431.30-90850.00850.0012300310/5/2018Gidget stevens10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2021.2721.2712300410/5/2018Guido nevarez10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-201.251.2512300510/5/2018HarrisXT00145430Door hanger paper050-1400-414.21-10206.89413.77XT00145430Door hanger paper055-1400-414.21-10206.8812300610/5/2018Hartford life insurance companiesREQUEST 092718Group 109947085-0000-202.21-291,200.001,200.0012300710/5/2018Heather johnson10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2078.0978.0912300810/5/2018Holmes, johnREQUEST 092718Hospitalization reimb010-2500-425.11-902,655.542,995.54REQUEST 092718Reimbursement m/d/v010-2500-425.11-90340.0012300910/5/2018Horizon water9-4-3300-092718Water delivery010-2500-425.21-1027.00184.509-4-3100-092718Water delivery010-3100-431.21-10139.509-4-1200-092718Water delivery010-2500-425.21-1018.0012301010/5/2018Ib reprographics138121San marcos waterline199-9999-425.40-0138.1276.23138121San marcos waterline199-9999-425.40-0138.1112301110/5/2018Icma retirement trustREQUEST 092718Group 300434 ppe 092718085-0000-202.21-292,800.002,800.0012301210/5/2018Image sourceAR815899Copies 8/15-9/14/18010-4200-410.34-05235.572,196.71AR816672Copies 8/18-9/17/18010-3100-431.34-05121.13AR816672Copies 8/18-9/17/18010-2500-425.34-051,840.0112301310/5/2018Infosend inc.142239Data processing/mail srvc050-1400-414.34-05344.55689.10142239Data processing/mail srvc055-1400-414.34-05344.5512301410/5/2018J & m air conditioning (dba)130234Tested cooling west end010-3100-431.33-1073.0073.0012301510/5/2018Janice oldham10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2050.6250.6212301610/5/2018Jeff g peterson10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-2031.1031.1012301710/5/2018Jessie cook10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2016.7716.7712301810/5/2018Jodie l lewis10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-208.598.5912301910/5/2018Juan estrada10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2019.9419.9412302010/5/2018Karl's tractor service5448Disking 7th & rex179-9700-470.36-95365.00465.005449Disking sheriff & first010-3320-431.34-05100.0012302110/5/2018Kimberly phally onn10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-201.301.3012302210/5/2018Lake elsinore & san jacinto8811Fy 2018-19 le & cl tmdl010-4140-410.34-064,500.004,500.0012302310/5/2018Lewis e butler10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-2019.2219.223.A.3.aPacket Pg. 12Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 5Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total12302410/5/2018Lisa e meyer10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-20123.30123.3012302510/5/2018Lois a newton10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-2011.5211.5212302610/5/2018Lynn merrill and associates, inc.FY 19-2Services 8/13-31/18010-4140-410.34-06664.951,020.06T19-8Services 8/13-31/18010-4140-410.34-06355.1112302710/5/2018Maria hernandez10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2022.6422.6412302810/5/2018Mark dickson10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-2028.6428.6412302910/5/2018Maurice daughertyREQUEST 090418Bsa achievement awards065-0000-229.09-13450.86450.8612303010/5/2018Michael rodriguez10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-207.627.6212303110/5/2018Michael schenk10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-2016.9916.9912303210/5/2018Minuteman press, inc.41705Weekly enrollment notices048-1400-414.36-10163.79163.7912303310/5/2018National safety compliance, inc.74464Epn reports010-7101-410.34-058.0024.0074464Epn reports050-9000-450.34-058.0074464Epn reports050-1400-414.34-054.0074464Epn reports010-1400-414.34-054.0012303410/5/2018Opengov, inc.INV-002256Reporting & analysis 2019010-1400-414.34-057,000.007,000.0012303510/5/2018Paisley, sharonREQUEST 092718Reimbursement m/d/v010-2500-425.11-90120.00120.0012303610/5/2018Patricia ruiz10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-2012.5312.5312303710/5/2018Premier party & tent rentals, inc37531Stage010-2510-425.40-33483.601,450.8037565Stage010-2510-425.40-33483.6037566Stage010-2510-425.40-33483.6012303810/5/2018Press enterprise0011173467Legal ad plan comm seats010-1110-411.36-25123.20123.2012303910/5/2018Rebecca bain10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2059.4859.4812304010/5/2018Regina patterson10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2071.2771.2712304110/5/2018Rightway site services, inc.237117Rent & labor 9/18-10/15010-4200-410.34-05345.45345.4512304210/5/2018Riverside cal-idSH0000033492Cal-id member assessment010-3100-431.34-0847,925.0047,925.0012304310/5/2018Riverside countyPU0000004501Fleet fuel july 2018050-9000-450.21-701,146.884,511.93PU0000004501Fleet fuel july 2018055-4170-450.21-70366.26PU0000004501Fleet fuel july 2018010-4150-410.21-70417.36PU0000004501Fleet fuel july 2018010-4140-410.21-70364.01PU0000004501Fleet fuel july 2018010-7100-410.21-701,144.09PU0000004501Fleet fuel july 2018010-3100-431.21-70444.963.A.3.aPacket Pg. 13Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 6Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123043...10/5/2018...Riverside county...PU0000004501Maint fees july 2018010-3100-431.33-50104.844,511.93...PU0000004501Fleet fuel july 2018010-3320-431.21-70412.18PU0000004501Fleet fuel july 2018011-3300-431.21-70111.3512304410/5/2018Riverside county info technologyIT0000002252Apx 7500m dual band aug18024-3100-431.34-05590.97590.9712304510/5/2018Robert gause10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2057.9057.9012304610/5/2018Rodum turnage10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-206.666.6612304710/5/2018Ronald melton10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-2016.4716.4712304810/5/2018Row traffic safety inc16096Paisley street sign010-4200-410.21-1042.2942.2912304910/5/2018Roy alvarez10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2077.9777.9712305010/5/2018Ruiz, crystalREQUEST 092518Reimb park n fly dc trip010-1100-411.31-2073.9273.9212305110/5/2018Salvadore cordero10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-207.427.4212305210/5/2018Seiu local 721REQUEST 092718Seiu dues sept 2018085-0000-202.21-431,382.152,173.29REQUEST 092718Cope contrib sept 2018085-0000-202.21-4395.00REQUEST 092718Seiu dues august 2018085-0000-202.21-43696.1412305310/5/2018Shannon blanco10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-2015.6915.6912305410/5/2018Sharon glass10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-2033.2033.2012305510/5/2018Shred-it usa llc/ corp8125589976On-site regular service010-2500-425.34-05136.45179.538125589976On-site regular service010-3100-431.34-0543.0812305610/5/2018Southern california radar/laser lab718021Lidar cert024-3100-431.33-1175.0075.0012305710/5/2018Staples credit plan - ch979169585610 logitech m310 laser017-2290-418.21-10125.09125.0912305810/5/2018Star auto parts212134Battery parade engine034-3200-431.33-50176.68176.6812305910/5/2018Steno solutions, inc.431328 reports aug 2018010-3100-431.34-0560.6660.6612306010/5/2018Stephen mclaughlan10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2047.4547.4512306110/5/2018Sunrise at parkhillREQUEST 100118Reimb sce charges per mou322-8831-500.35-14113.831,073.19REQUEST 100118Reimb lhmwd per mou322-8831-500.35-10959.3612306210/5/2018Superion, llc (formerly sungard)215401Asp maint oct 2018010-1400-414.34-054,359.004,359.0012306310/5/2018Teresa homeyer10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2025.5925.5912306410/5/2018The thomsen company, inc.2018-034Plancheck 2 legal, 2 plat065-0000-211.21-01247.501,072.502018-035Task 1 verify task 2 plan065-0000-201.06-45825.0012306510/5/2018Tim lueken10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2044.7744.773.A.3.aPacket Pg. 14Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 7Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total12306610/5/2018Time warner cable0541420091718Service 9/27-10/16/18017-2290-418.34-201,624.751,624.7512306710/5/2018Tracy mcbride10022018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2025.7625.7612306810/5/2018Tri lake consultants, inc.43553Prof services aug 2018010-4100-410.30-908,618.0057,741.2543554Prof services aug 2018065-0000-211.21-01700.0043556Prof services aug 2018065-0000-211.21-011,360.0043557Prof services aug 2018065-0000-211.21-01350.0043559Prof services aug 2018011-4100-410.30-9050.0043560Prof services aug 2018065-0000-211.21-2140.0043561Prof services aug 2018065-0000-211.21-2150.0043562Prof services aug 2018199-9999-425.40-0115,502.5043563Prof services aug 2018199-9999-425.40-01300.0043564Prof services aug 2018199-9999-425.40-01225.0043565Prof services aug 2018199-9999-425.40-01245.5043566Prof services aug 2018199-9999-425.40-012,582.5043567Prof services aug 2018199-9999-425.40-0113,955.0043568Prof services aug 2018199-9999-425.40-01450.0043570Prof services aug 2018199-9999-425.40-011,361.0043571Prof services aug 2018011-4100-410.30-90292.2043572Prof services aug 2018011-4100-410.30-90350.0043573Prof services aug 2018011-4100-410.30-901,443.0043574Prof services aug 2018011-4100-410.30-90450.0043575Prof services aug 2018011-4100-410.30-90350.0043576Prof services aug 2018199-9999-425.40-011,569.2543577Prof services aug 2018199-9999-425.40-01325.0043579Prof services aug 2018065-0000-211.21-211,100.9043580Prof services aug 2018065-0000-201.08-5375.0043581Prof services aug 2018199-9999-425.40-01275.0043582Prof services aug 2018065-0000-211.21-21414.3543583Prof services aug 2018065-0000-211.21-0140.0043584Prof services aug 2018065-0000-211.21-01350.0043585Prof services aug 2018065-0000-211.21-21570.0043586Prof services aug 2018065-0000-201.06-50748.053.A.3.aPacket Pg. 15Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 8Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123068...10/5/2018...Tri lake consultants, inc....43587Prof services aug 2018011-4100-410.30-901,029.0057,741.25...43588Prof services aug 2018065-0000-211.21-2180.0043589Prof services aug 2018011-4100-410.30-90125.0043590Prof services aug 2018065-0000-201.06-50110.0043591Prof services aug 2018065-0000-201.06-5020.0043592Prof services aug 2018065-0000-201.06-5020.0043593Prof services aug 2018011-3300-431.30-902,215.0012306910/5/2018Vanessa garcia10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-2017.3217.3212307010/5/2018Vasquez, victorREQUEST 092718Reimbursement m/d/v010-2500-425.11-90282.46282.4612307110/5/2018Verizon wireless9814385582Service 8/11-9/10/18024-3100-431.21-9055.2055.2012307210/5/2018Western riverside council254Fy 18/19 wrcog member due010-2500-425.31-255,889.325,889.3212307310/5/2018William c fishburn10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-2017.4217.4212307410/5/2018Xerox financial services1309176Lease 9/18-10/17 3 copier010-2500-425.34-052,336.512,550.651309176Lease 9/18-10/17 3 copier010-3100-431.34-05214.1412307510/5/2018Yanez, crystal v.REQUEST 092718Tuition reimb 3 classes010-2500-425.31-205,310.245,310.2412307610/5/2018Yvonne oden10022018"double sce's nem rate!"048-0000-203.22-2023.5723.5712307710/12/2018American fence co. inc.2100100Temp fence 9/26-10/25/18010-3320-431.34-05100.00100.0012307810/12/2018Azavar audit,inc.145992Sce audit / #38 of 48010-1400-414.30-9015.9615.9612307910/12/2018Babcock laboratories, inc.BI81784-0278Coliforms p/a by mmo/mug050-9000-450.30-9070.00204.00BI81813-0278Iron by icp, manganese050-9000-450.30-90120.00BI82065-0278Coliforms p/a by mmo/mug050-9000-450.30-9014.0012308010/12/2018Brady, robert (bob)REQUEST 100418Reimb cell phone expense010-4200-410.35-1775.0075.0012308110/12/2018Brenntag pacific, inc.BPI874915Sodium hypochlorite050-9000-450.21-122,362.0811,207.77BPI875340Sodium hypochlorite050-9000-450.21-123,777.44BPI877295Sodium hypochlorite050-9000-450.21-125,068.2512308210/12/2018California building standardsREQUEST 100818Fees for 7/1/18 - 9/30/18065-0000-201.09-03953.00857.70REQUEST 100818Fees for 7/1/18 - 9/30/18010-0000-310.07-96-95.3012308310/12/2018Cash, jimREQUEST 092418Reimburese mileage050-9000-450.31-20272.50272.5012308410/12/2018Cash, jimREQUEST 100418Reimb workboot purchase050-9000-450.21-35200.00200.0012308510/12/2018Cmta/calif municipal treasurers300001810Membership fy 18/19010-1400-414.30-16155.00155.0012308610/12/2018Cr&r incorporatedREQUEST 100318Trash & recycling sept'18059-8052-450.34-0512.8113.053.A.3.aPacket Pg. 16Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 9Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123086...10/12/2018...Cr&r incorporated...REQUEST 100318Trash & recycling june'18059-8052-450.34-050.2413.05...12308710/12/2018Department of conservationREQUEST 100818Fees for 7/1/18 - 9/30/18065-0000-201.08-682,510.622,385.09REQUEST 100818Fees for 7/1/18 - 9/30/18010-0000-310.07-96-125.5312308810/12/2018Dewey pest control inc.12173251Pest control srvc oct '18034-3200-431.34-0539.0084.0012159734Pest control srvc oct '18010-2500-425.34-0545.0012308910/12/2018Eastern municipal water districtREQUEST 100318Water service325-8831-500.35-10679.774,682.58REQUEST 100318Water service326-8831-500.35-101,651.12REQUEST 100318Water service341-8831-500.35-101,099.09REQUEST 100318Water service345-8831-500.35-101,146.00REQUEST 100318Water service355-8831-500.35-1062.82REQUEST 100318Water service353-8831-500.35-1043.7812309010/12/2018Eastern municipal water districtREQUEST 100318Sewer/trash settlement059-0000-308.08-68-15.2559,746.74REQUEST 100318Sewer/trash settlement055-0000-308.07-30-38,140.76REQUEST 100318Sewer/trash settlement055-0000-201.20-4097,902.7512309110/12/2018El ojo de agua100Food for band010-2510-425.40-1285.0085.0012309210/12/2018Fedex corporation6-321-97904Delivery service010-1110-411.21-6524.01192.726-321-97904Delivery service011-1700-417.21-6530.266-321-97904Delivery service011-1700-417.21-6538.666-321-97904Delivery service011-1700-417.21-6530.266-321-97904Delivery service011-1700-417.21-6531.936-321-97904Delivery service010-1110-411.21-6537.6012309310/12/2018Frontier communicationsREQUEST 100218Telephone service010-6500-425.35-1647.34375.88REQUEST 100918Telephone service010-3100-431.35-16144.48REQUEST 100918Telephone service010-4200-410.35-16184.0612309410/12/2018Full service carpet care09282018Carpet & upholstery clean034-3200-431.33-10525.00525.0012309510/12/2018J & m air conditioning (dba)130366Replaced a/c compressor010-3100-431.33-10950.00950.0012309610/12/2018Lake hemet municipal water district10032018Water service / agape322-8831-500.35-10784.061,090.6210032018Water srvc / bastille way302-8831-500.35-1098.3310032018Water srvc / gospel dr367-8831-500.35-1088.0710032018Water srvc / washington367-8831-500.35-10120.1612309710/12/2018Meza, ivan09242018Reimburse mileage055-4170-450.31-20272.50272.503.A.3.aPacket Pg. 17Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 10Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total12309810/12/2018Mullen, arthur09242018Reimburse mileage050-9000-450.31-20272.50272.5012309910/12/2018Online information services, inc.468300000217Collection service fees050-0000-308.09-1063.80319.57468300000217Collection service fees059-0000-308.08-68148.27887057Utility exchange reports050-1400-414.34-0553.75887057Utility exchange reports055-1400-414.34-0553.7512310010/12/2018Pacific alarm service,inc.R 142267Alarm service oct 2018010-6500-425.34-0538.00648.50R 142267Alarm service oct 2018010-2500-425.34-05124.00R 142267Alarm service oct 2018050-9000-450.34-05191.50R 142267Alarm service oct 2018010-4200-410.34-05217.50R 142267Alarm service oct 2018010-3100-431.34-0577.5012310110/12/2018Pacific alarm service,inc.R 142206Alarm service oct-dec'18010-3100-431.34-05134.85134.8512310210/12/2018Pereida, salvador09242018Reimburse mileage010-4140-410.31-20272.50272.5012310310/12/2018Ramirez, andy09242018Reimburse mileage010-4140-410.31-2090.83272.5009242018Reimburse mileage010-4150-410.31-2090.8309242018Reimburse mileage010-7100-410.31-2090.8412310410/12/2018Ramona humane society, inc.COSJ8312Shltr & aco srvcs aug'18010-3320-431.34-0517,964.5317,964.5312310510/12/2018Regional conservation authorityREQUEST 100418Fees for sept 2018065-0000-201.08-8142,080.0042,080.0012310610/12/2018Rightway site services, inc.237169Rent/labor 9/19-10/16/18010-3100-431.34-5082.7882.7812310710/12/2018Row traffic safety inc1609830 signs and misc.024-4150-410.21-362,125.262,167.5516121Sns sign010-4200-410.21-1042.2912310810/12/2018Samano, pabloREQUEST 092418Reimb comm'l drv permit055-4170-450.31-2076.0076.0012310910/12/2018Sensus usa inc.ZA18009685Annual software support050-1400-414.34-051,715.951,715.9512311010/12/2018Southern california edisonREQUEST 101018Electricity service010-2500-425.35-1428.2245,684.14REQUEST 101018Electricity service010-3100-431.35-142,455.88REQUEST 101018Electricity service010-4150-410.35-142,859.22REQUEST 101018Electricity service010-4200-410.35-1426.42REQUEST 101018Electricity service010-6100-425.35-14735.04REQUEST 101018Electricity service010-6500-425.35-14174.36REQUEST 101018Electricity service010-7100-410.35-14184.47REQUEST 101018Electricity service025-7100-410.35-14229.05REQUEST 101018Electricity service025-7250-410.35-14911.453.A.3.aPacket Pg. 18Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 11Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123110...10/12/2018...Southern california edison...REQUEST 101018Electricity service025-7251-410.35-1423.6645,684.14...REQUEST 101018Electricity service025-7252-410.35-14596.10REQUEST 101018Electricity service025-7260-410.35-1412,145.67REQUEST 101018Electricity service050-9000-450.35-149,034.73REQUEST 101018Electricity service065-0000-201.06-0615.92REQUEST 101018Electricity service308-8831-500.35-1476.62REQUEST 101018Electricity service311-8831-500.35-14107.62REQUEST 101018Electricity service320-8831-500.35-1480.13REQUEST 101018Electricity service323-8831-500.35-1475.11REQUEST 101018Electricity service325-8831-500.35-1425.17REQUEST 101018Electricity service327-8831-500.35-1428.39REQUEST 101018Electricity service331-8831-500.35-1454.65REQUEST 101018Electricity service332-8831-500.35-1472.57REQUEST 101018Electricity service338-8831-500.35-1425.17REQUEST 101018Electricity service339-8831-500.35-1424.94REQUEST 101018Electricity service341-8831-500.35-1425.37REQUEST 101018Electricity service342-8831-500.35-1439.96REQUEST 101018Electricity service343-8831-500.35-14100.41REQUEST 101018Electricity service351-8831-500.35-1424.18REQUEST 101018Electricity service353-8831-500.35-1450.66REQUEST 101018Electricity service362-8831-500.35-1482.72REQUEST 101018Electricity service367-8831-500.35-1453.51REQUEST 101018Electricity service368-8831-500.35-1423.81REQUEST 101018Electricity service376-8831-500.35-1431.07REQUEST 101018Electricity service348-8831-500.35-1447.75REQUEST 101018Electricity service359-8831-500.35-14126.50REQUEST 101018Electricity service332-8831-500.35-1459.03REQUEST 101018Electricity service010-4150-410.35-142,772.68REQUEST 101018Electricity service010-4150-410.35-140.03REQUEST 101018Electricity service010-4150-410.35-14157.61REQUEST 101018Electricity service025-7260-410.35-1470.19REQUEST 101018Electricity service302-8831-500.35-14222.473.A.3.aPacket Pg. 19Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 12Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123110...10/12/2018...Southern california edison...REQUEST 101018Electricity service305-8831-500.35-14143.5145,684.14...REQUEST 101018Electricity service306-8831-500.35-14225.57REQUEST 101018Electricity service308-8831-500.35-141,098.55REQUEST 101018Electricity service309-8831-500.35-14286.23REQUEST 101018Electricity service310-8831-500.35-14338.27REQUEST 101018Electricity service311-8831-500.35-14415.78REQUEST 101018Electricity service313-8831-500.35-14443.13REQUEST 101018Electricity service314-8831-500.35-1411.72REQUEST 101018Electricity service315-8831-500.35-143.61REQUEST 101018Electricity service316-8831-500.35-1447.05REQUEST 101018Electricity service319-8831-500.35-14112.16REQUEST 101018Electricity service319-8832-500.35-1421.79REQUEST 101018Electricity service321-8831-500.35-14233.41REQUEST 101018Electricity service322-8831-500.35-14423.48REQUEST 101018Electricity service323-8831-500.35-14281.27REQUEST 101018Electricity service324-8831-500.35-1435.81REQUEST 101018Electricity service325-8831-500.35-14521.87REQUEST 101018Electricity service326-8831-500.35-141,023.46REQUEST 101018Electricity service327-8831-500.35-14552.14REQUEST 101018Electricity service330-8831-500.35-14177.24REQUEST 101018Electricity service331-8831-500.35-14191.66REQUEST 101018Electricity service332-8831-500.35-14588.58REQUEST 101018Electricity service333-8831-500.35-14138.00REQUEST 101018Electricity service335-8831-500.35-1474.57REQUEST 101018Electricity service336-8831-500.35-1416.92REQUEST 101018Electricity service337-8831-500.35-14169.87REQUEST 101018Electricity service339-8831-500.35-14121.06REQUEST 101018Electricity service340-8831-500.35-1462.73REQUEST 101018Electricity service341-8831-500.35-14313.80REQUEST 101018Electricity service342-8831-500.35-1410.32REQUEST 101018Electricity service343-8831-500.35-14663.19REQUEST 101018Electricity service345-8831-500.35-14907.963.A.3.aPacket Pg. 20Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 13Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123110...10/12/2018...Southern california edison...REQUEST 101018Electricity service346-8831-500.35-14478.0145,684.14...REQUEST 101018Electricity service351-8831-500.35-1471.60REQUEST 101018Electricity service352-8831-500.35-145.86REQUEST 101018Electricity service354-8831-500.35-1411.57REQUEST 101018Electricity service359-8831-500.35-149.70REQUEST 101018Electricity service360-8831-500.35-14106.32REQUEST 101018Electricity service362-8831-500.35-14288.23REQUEST 101018Electricity service366-8831-500.35-1426.53REQUEST 101018Electricity service367-8831-500.35-1491.03REQUEST 101018Electricity service368-8831-500.35-14128.52REQUEST 101018Electricity service369-8831-500.35-1420.99REQUEST 101018Electricity service371-8831-500.35-1415.33REQUEST 101018Electricity service373-8831-500.35-1415.55REQUEST 101018Electricity service375-8831-500.35-1425.36REQUEST 101018Electricity service376-8831-500.35-14532.11REQUEST 101018Electricity service385-8831-500.35-1429.40REQUEST 101018Electricity service386-8831-500.35-1474.59REQUEST 101018Electricity service388-8831-500.35-1415.92REQUEST 101018Electricity service389-8831-500.35-1410.16REQUEST 101018Electricity service390-8831-500.35-1425.69REQUEST 101018Electricity service391-8831-500.35-1425.59REQUEST 101018Electricity service304-8831-500.35-142.56REQUEST 101018Electricity service309-8831-500.35-146.70REQUEST 101018Electricity service310-8831-500.35-141.09REQUEST 101018Electricity service312-8831-500.35-145.94REQUEST 101018Electricity service318-8831-500.35-144.24REQUEST 101018Electricity service319-8832-500.35-146.40REQUEST 101018Electricity service321-8831-500.35-145.95REQUEST 101018Electricity service322-8831-500.35-1419.15REQUEST 101018Electricity service323-8831-500.35-145.95REQUEST 101018Electricity service324-8831-500.35-144.24REQUEST 101018Electricity service333-8831-500.35-140.643.A.3.aPacket Pg. 21Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 14Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123110...10/12/2018...Southern california edison...REQUEST 101018Electricity service334-8831-500.35-141.0945,684.14...REQUEST 101018Electricity service335-8831-500.35-141.24REQUEST 101018Electricity service336-8831-500.35-141.43REQUEST 101018Electricity service337-8831-500.35-140.80REQUEST 101018Electricity service339-8831-500.35-141.56REQUEST 101018Electricity service342-8831-500.35-140.61REQUEST 101018Electricity service343-8831-500.35-145.95REQUEST 101018Electricity service359-8831-500.35-1428.69REQUEST 101018Electricity service367-8831-500.35-146.38REQUEST 101018Electricity service369-8831-500.35-1411.89REQUEST 101018Electricity service372-8831-500.35-144.24REQUEST 101018Electricity service380-8831-500.35-145.94REQUEST 101018Electricity service383-8831-500.35-144.24REQUEST 101018Electricity service388-8831-500.35-145.9412311110/12/2018Staples business advantage, inc.3390301328Office supplies010-2500-425.21-10252.922,149.173390301328Office supplies010-1110-411.21-1060.303390301328Office supplies010-1400-414.21-10223.013390301333Office supplies010-1200-412.21-10305.863390301331Office supplies010-3100-431.21-10962.183390892526Office supplies050-1400-414.21-1046.723390892523Office supplies010-1200-412.21-1061.993390892523Office supplies010-1400-414.21-108.233390892523Office supplies011-1700-417.21-1033.393390892523Office supplies010-3320-431.21-1030.273390892523Office supplies050-1400-414.21-1099.043390892523Office supplies010-2500-425.21-1060.503390892527Office supplies102-1400-500.21-102.953390301330Office supplies010-1400-414.21-101.8112311210/12/2018Superior ready mix concrete, l.p.987511Fill sand050-9000-450.21-12796.05796.0512311310/12/2018Tony's tires09062018Service tire010-7100-410.33-30125.00125.0012311410/12/2018Totalplan business interiors, inc.080853Add'l work stations064-3100-431.40-4513,295.2713,295.2712311510/12/2018West coast arborists, inc140239Tree service308-8831-500.34-052,700.0010,152.003.A.3.aPacket Pg. 22Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 15Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123115...10/12/2018...West coast arborists, inc...140238Tree service025-7252-410.34-054,488.0010,152.00...140237Tree service025-7252-410.34-052,964.0012311610/12/2018Western riverside councilREQUEST 100418Fees for sept 2018065-0000-201.08-80177,460.00177,460.0012311710/12/2018Windstream (formerly paetec)70545638Communication service010-3100-431.35-161,238.982,262.7570554643Communication service010-2500-425.35-161,023.7712311810/12/2018Youhouse, josephREQUEST 100818Reimburse tuition expense050-9000-450.31-20199.99199.9912311910/19/2018Aarvig & associates, apc33785Defense cost/claim js1701020-2200-419.30-90942.272,882.7433787Defense cost/claim js1713020-2200-419.30-901,940.4712312010/19/2018Adlerhorst international, llc inc.101436K-9 training sept 2018010-3100-431.34-12175.00175.0012312110/19/2018Adt security services, inc.674868494Alarm srvc 10/22-11/21/18010-6100-425.34-0544.9944.9912312210/19/2018Aflac471786Premium sept 2018085-0000-202.21-271,372.581,372.5812312310/19/2018Anderson golf carts9102Labor, parts050-9000-450.33-50248.691,006.999103Labor, parts050-9000-450.33-50262.019104Labor, parts050-9000-450.33-50496.2912312410/19/2018Applied earthworks inc.3869-03Services thru 7/31/2018199-9999-425.40-011,864.955,338.743869-04Services thru 8/31/2018199-9999-425.40-013,473.7912312510/19/2018Aramark uniform1450271025Uniform service050-9000-450.21-3534.69322.781450271025Uniform service055-4170-450.21-3519.161450271025Uniform service010-4140-410.21-3514.371450282996Uniform service050-9000-450.21-3534.691450282996Uniform service055-4170-450.21-3519.161450282996Uniform service010-4140-410.21-3521.741450294880Uniform service010-7101-410.21-354.791450294880Uniform service010-7100-410.21-3514.371450294881Floor mat service050-1400-414.34-059.261450294881Floor mat service010-4200-410.34-0515.671450294882Uniform service010-4150-410.21-3510.721450294883Uniform service010-4140-410.21-3511.671450294883Uniform service050-9000-450.21-3534.691450294883Uniform service055-4170-450.21-3519.161450306679Uniform service050-9000-450.21-3534.693.A.3.aPacket Pg. 23Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 16Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123125...10/19/2018...Aramark uniform...1450306679Uniform service055-4170-450.21-3519.16322.78...1450306679Uniform service010-4140-410.21-359.581450306679Credit050-9000-450.21-35-4.7912312610/19/2018Arrow printing, inc.17916Business cards010-1100-411.21-1036.63741.0117916Business cards010-1110-411.21-1036.6517916Business cards011-1700-417.21-1036.6317916Business cards010-3320-431.21-1018.3217916Business cards011-3300-431.21-1018.31179712,500 envelopes010-2500-425.21-10213.35179848"x 8" sign,comp graphics010-4200-410.21-1040.6317995Business cards010-1210-412.21-1036.6317995Business cards011-1700-417.21-1036.6317995Business cards010-3320-431.21-1036.6317995Business cards010-4200-410.21-1036.6317995Business cards010-9600-960.21-10193.9712312710/19/2018Automated gate services, inc.128885Gate service010-3100-431.33-10181.50181.5012312810/19/2018B & w pipe & supply99672Rain/pro telescopic popup010-7100-410.21-1287.0987.0912312910/19/2018Babcock laboratories, inc.BI82590-0278Coliforms p/a by mmo/mug050-9000-450.30-9070.001,120.00BJ80235-0278Coliforms p/a by mmo/mug050-9000-450.30-9070.00BJ80237-0278General physical analysis050-9000-450.30-9030.00BJ80243-0278Haloacetic acid,trihalome050-9000-450.30-90780.00BJ80244-0278Trichloropropane050-9000-450.30-90100.00BJ80647-0278Coliforms p/a by mmo/mug050-9000-450.30-9070.0012313010/19/2018Bank of america business cardREQUEST 101518Diamond bright cleaners010-1100-411.31-2068.50169.90REQUEST 101518Municipal mgmt assoc.010-1100-411.31-2025.00REQUEST 101518Emilios restaurant010-1100-411.31-2076.4012313110/19/2018Bank of america business cardREQUEST 101518Amazon.com010-7101-410.21-8038.1638.1612313210/19/2018Bank of america business cardREQUEST 101518Walmart010-3100-431.36-25682.10979.54REQUEST 101518Amazon marketplace010-3100-431.21-9036.18REQUEST 101518Walmart.com010-3100-431.21-90219.37REQUEST 101518Walmart.com010-3100-431.21-9041.893.A.3.aPacket Pg. 24Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 17Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total12313310/19/2018Bank of america business cardREQUEST 101518South point hotel055-4170-450.31-20322.05966.15REQUEST 101518South point hotel050-9000-450.31-20322.05REQUEST 101518South point hotel050-9000-450.31-20322.0512313410/19/2018Bank of america business cardREQUEST 101518Acec011-1700-417.21-10122.11168.09REQUEST 101518Amazon marketplace011-1700-417.21-1049.55REQUEST 101518Sales tax not charged010-0000-201.20-45-3.5712313510/19/2018Bank of america business cardREQUEST 101518Walmart010-3100-431.21-1080.64909.68REQUEST 101518Otc brands010-3100-431.36-25829.0412313610/19/2018Bank of america business cardREQUEST 101518Westin hotel long beach010-1110-411.31-2056.001,601.00REQUEST 101518League of ca cities regis010-1110-411.31-20475.00REQUEST 101518City clerks assoc registr010-1110-411.31-20175.00REQUEST 101518Compulink mgmt/laserfiche010-1110-411.31-20895.0012313710/19/2018Bank of america business cardREQUEST 101518Misac annual membership017-2290-418.30-16130.001,610.27REQUEST 101518Hostway.com017-2290-418.34-05239.40REQUEST 101518Compulink mgmt/laserfiche017-2290-418.31-20895.00REQUEST 101518Amazon.com017-2290-418.21-10345.8712313810/19/2018Bank of america business cardREQUEST 101518Amazon.com010-1210-412.31-20189.00189.0012313910/19/2018Bank of america business cardREQUEST 101518Walmart010-2510-425.40-121,993.312,093.31REQUEST 101518Icsc mbrship - r. yarnall010-9600-960.30-16100.0012314010/19/2018Barron, austinREQUEST 100818Reimburse h/d/v expense010-2500-425.11-90544.59544.5912314110/19/2018Bee patrol0074Bee removal service367-8831-500.34-05125.00170.000075Bee removal service303-8831-500.34-0545.0012314210/19/2018Boot barn inc.IVCO152225Work boots - k. carranza010-7100-410.21-35200.00200.0012314310/19/2018Brenntag pacific, inc.BPI879923Sodium hypochlorite050-9000-450.21-123,256.596,640.56BPI881732Sodium hypochlorite050-9000-450.21-123,383.9712314410/19/2018Cal window & solarREQUEST 100918Refund business lic fee010-0000-301.01-6017.5021.50REQUEST 100918Refund business lic fee065-0000-201.09-084.0012314510/19/2018Calpers supplemental income plansREQUEST 10111810/11/2018 contributions085-0000-202.21-293,097.963,530.41REQUEST 101118Pers repayment085-0000-202.21-28432.4512314610/19/2018Ced - san jacinto, inc.2983-51152611 watt 120 volt led lamp338-8831-500.34-0579.7479.7412314710/19/2018Complete towing & recovery08232018Towing service010-3100-431.30-90250.00250.003.A.3.aPacket Pg. 25Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 18Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total12314810/19/2018Cr&r incorporated29-0020120 0-10Trash service 10/1-12/31010-6500-425.33-4076.3876.3812314910/19/2018Crafco inc9401927439Hp asphalt 5.990 tons050-9000-450.21-121,556.941,556.9412315010/19/2018D.m.c. tree care1542Tree service010-4150-410.34-052,570.006,495.001554Tree service329-8831-500.34-05625.001555Trim 13 palms/san jac ave025-7250-410.34-05700.001556Trim 22 palms/ramona blvd025-7250-410.34-052,600.0012315110/19/2018Dave's hauling9262018Easement clean up025-7250-410.34-05350.0011,090.0009282018Clean major city streets010-4150-410.34-055,900.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc301-8831-500.34-0540.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc307-8831-500.34-0520.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc308-8831-500.34-0580.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc311-8831-500.34-05220.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc313-8831-500.34-0580.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc320-8831-500.34-05120.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc321-8831-500.34-0540.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc322-8831-500.34-05120.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc325-8831-500.34-0580.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc326-8831-500.34-0580.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc327-8831-500.34-0560.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc329-8831-500.34-0560.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc331-8831-500.34-0560.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc332-8831-500.34-0580.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc338-8831-500.34-0580.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc341-8831-500.34-0540.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc343-8831-500.34-0540.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc345-8831-500.34-05160.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc346-8831-500.34-0560.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc353-8831-500.34-0520.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc355-8831-500.34-0520.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc362-8831-500.34-0520.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc363-8831-500.34-05100.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc367-8831-500.34-0560.003.A.3.aPacket Pg. 26Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 19Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123151...10/19/2018...Dave's hauling...09282018Park/landscape trash srvc376-8831-500.34-05480.0011,090.00...09282018Park/landscape trash srvc025-7252-410.34-0520.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc025-7252-410.34-0540.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc025-7252-410.34-0520.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc025-7252-410.34-0520.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc025-7100-410.34-0520.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc025-7100-410.34-05100.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc025-7100-410.34-05640.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc025-7252-410.34-051,120.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc025-7100-410.34-0560.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc025-7100-410.34-0580.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc025-7250-410.34-05140.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc010-7100-410.34-0520.0009282018Park/landscape trash srvc010-3100-431.34-0520.0009282018State street bus stops010-4150-410.34-05320.0012315210/19/2018Dhandho residential rental fund lpREQUEST 100218Refund water deposit050-0000-229.08-70186.66186.6612315310/19/2018Engie services (formerly opterra)12122Maintenance fees aug 2018050-9000-450.34-051,382.882,233.7112126Maintenance fees aug 2018050-9000-450.34-05850.8312315410/19/2018Ewing incorporation6252991Irrigation supplies376-8831-500.34-05186.031,592.296252992Irrigation supplies345-8831-500.34-05958.236252992Irrigation supplies325-8831-500.34-05448.0312315510/19/2018Ez sunnyday landscape1060Irrigation repairs376-8831-500.34-051,093.0031,977.001064Irrigation repairs301-8831-500.34-0530.001082Irrigation repairs025-7100-410.34-05440.001083Irrigation repairs322-8831-500.34-05120.001084Irrigation repairs025-7252-410.34-05265.001085Irrigation repairs301-8831-500.34-05210.001086Irrigation repairs376-8831-500.34-05120.001087Irrigation repairs025-7252-410.34-0560.001088Irrigation repairs025-7252-410.34-0590.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7100-410.34-05440.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7100-410.34-05630.003.A.3.aPacket Pg. 27Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 20Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123155...10/19/2018...Ez sunnyday landscape...1067Maintenance sept 2018025-7100-410.34-05606.0031,977.00...1067Maintenance sept 2018025-7250-410.34-0541.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7250-410.34-0563.001067Maintenance sept 2018010-7100-410.34-0564.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7250-410.34-0547.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7250-410.34-0549.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7250-410.34-0599.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7250-410.34-0569.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7250-410.34-0575.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7251-410.34-051,000.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7252-410.34-05700.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7252-410.34-05300.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7252-410.34-05475.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7252-410.34-05475.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7252-410.34-05475.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7252-410.34-05475.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7252-410.34-05575.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7252-410.34-05475.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7250-410.34-05100.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7250-410.34-05143.001067Maintenance sept 2018302-8831-500.34-05150.001067Maintenance sept 2018304-8831-500.34-0522.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7252-410.34-052,115.751067Maintenance sept 2018301-8831-500.34-051,900.001067Maintenance sept 2018301-8831-500.34-05131.751067Maintenance sept 2018316-8831-500.34-0531.001067Maintenance sept 2018317-8831-500.34-0541.001067Maintenance sept 2018319-8831-500.34-05112.001067Maintenance sept 2018320-8831-500.34-05900.001067Maintenance sept 2018322-8831-500.34-05800.001067Maintenance sept 2018367-8831-500.34-05250.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7250-410.34-05140.003.A.3.aPacket Pg. 28Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 21Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123155...10/19/2018...Ez sunnyday landscape...1067Maintenance sept 2018368-8831-500.34-0532.5031,977.00...1067Maintenance sept 2018025-7250-410.34-05400.001067Maintenance sept 2018331-8831-500.34-05215.001067Maintenance sept 2018310-8831-500.34-05150.001067Maintenance sept 2018309-8831-500.34-05950.001067Maintenance sept 2018309-8831-500.34-05100.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7252-410.34-05500.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7252-410.34-05500.001067Maintenance sept 2018025-7250-410.34-05600.001067Maintenance sept 2018331-8831-500.34-0560.001067Maintenance sept 2018322-8831-500.34-05135.001067Maintenance sept 2018320-8831-500.34-05175.001067Maintenance sept 2018319-8831-500.34-05200.001067Maintenance sept 2018304-8831-500.34-0535.001068Maintenance sept 2018010-7100-410.34-05220.001068Maintenance sept 2018025-7100-410.34-05320.001068Maintenance sept 2018025-7250-410.34-05100.001068Maintenance sept 2018025-7250-410.34-05200.001068Maintenance sept 2018376-8831-500.34-051,575.001068Maintenance sept 2018376-8831-500.34-052,400.001068Maintenance sept 2018025-7250-410.34-05200.001068Maintenance sept 2018359-8831-500.34-05650.001068Maintenance sept 2018025-7250-410.34-05225.001068Maintenance sept 2018339-8831-500.34-05100.001068Maintenance sept 2018025-7250-410.34-0565.001068Maintenance sept 2018025-7252-410.34-05395.001068Maintenance sept 2018025-7252-410.34-05295.001068Maintenance sept 2018025-7252-410.34-05395.001068Maintenance sept 2018025-7252-410.34-05395.001068Maintenance sept 2018025-7100-410.34-05195.001068Maintenance sept 2018025-7100-410.34-05175.001068Maintenance sept 2018388-8831-500.34-05100.003.A.3.aPacket Pg. 29Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 22Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123155...10/19/2018...Ez sunnyday landscape...1090Irriga valve cks sept '18309-8831-500.34-0572.0031,977.00...1090Irriga valve cks sept '18010-7100-410.34-0596.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18339-8831-500.34-0572.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18331-8831-500.34-0512.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18331-8831-500.34-0554.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7250-410.34-0554.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7250-410.34-0548.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7100-410.34-0524.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7250-410.34-0518.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7250-410.34-056.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18317-8831-500.34-056.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7250-410.34-056.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18302-8831-500.34-0524.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7100-410.34-05120.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7250-410.34-0518.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7100-410.34-0536.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7250-410.34-0512.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7100-410.34-0548.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7252-410.34-05156.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18322-8831-500.34-05240.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18304-8831-500.34-0566.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18319-8831-500.34-0524.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18310-8831-500.34-0548.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18367-8831-500.34-05102.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7250-410.34-0536.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18320-8831-500.34-05198.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7251-410.34-05126.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7252-410.34-0542.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7252-410.34-0524.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7252-410.34-0518.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7252-410.34-0536.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7252-410.34-0530.003.A.3.aPacket Pg. 30Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 23Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123155...10/19/2018...Ez sunnyday landscape...1090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7252-410.34-0542.0031,977.00...1090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7252-410.34-0572.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7252-410.34-0530.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7252-410.34-0524.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7252-410.34-0596.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7252-410.34-05300.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7250-410.34-0518.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7250-410.34-0548.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18010-7100-410.34-0524.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7252-410.34-0524.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7250-410.34-0584.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18376-8831-500.34-05570.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18388-8831-500.34-056.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18025-7250-410.34-0524.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18301-8831-500.34-05150.001090Irriga valve cks sept '18301-8831-500.34-05138.0012315610/19/2018Figueroa, davidREQUEST 100418Reimb comm'l drvr permit050-9000-450.31-2076.0076.0012315710/19/2018Five star painting, inc9297Painting service301-8831-500.34-053,401.003,401.0012315810/19/2018Fm lock and safe,inc.99932Service provdied010-3320-431.34-05135.00410.0099933Service provdied010-3320-431.34-05275.0012315910/19/2018Frontier communicationsREQUEST 101518Telephone service010-3100-431.35-1675.95207.62REQUEST 101518Telephone service010-6100-425.35-1648.26REQUEST 101518Telephone service050-9000-450.35-1683.4112316010/19/2018Hartford life insurance companiesREQUEST 10111810/11/2018, group #109947085-0000-202.21-291,200.001,200.0012316110/19/2018Holmes, michelleREQUEST 100418Reimburse h/d/v expense010-2500-425.11-9070.0070.0012316210/19/2018Home depot credit services2020466Garage door remotes034-3200-431.33-1085.81381.459014065Light supplies010-3100-431.33-1033.634562502Paint050-9000-450.21-12202.934036179Misc supplies025-7100-410.34-0515.717044093300 w & 150 w halogens010-7100-410.33-1043.3712316310/19/2018Ib reprographics138256Digital ppc199-9999-425.40-0192.4892.483.A.3.aPacket Pg. 31Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 24Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total12316410/19/2018Icma retirement trustREQUEST 10111810/11/2018, group #300434085-0000-202.21-292,900.002,900.0012316510/19/2018Infosend inc.142476Data processing/mail prep050-1400-414.34-051,283.592,567.18142476Data processing/mail prep055-1400-414.34-051,283.5912316610/19/2018Iron mountain inc.AGEM557Storage service oct 2018010-2500-425.30-90142.00142.0012316710/19/2018Ivan tangREQUEST 100218Refund water deposit050-0000-229.08-70157.97157.9712316810/19/2018Jessica zepedaREQUEST 100218Refund water deposit050-0000-229.08-70133.49133.4912316910/19/2018Jim's backflow service092618-FOXGLENBackflow test313-8831-500.34-0550.00250.00092618-GLACIERBackflow test025-7250-410.34-0550.00092618-MEADOWVIBackflow test313-8831-500.34-0550.00092618-MEADOW-2Backflow test313-8831-500.34-0550.00092618-WINDSONGBackflow test025-7250-410.34-0550.0012317010/19/2018Kaiser foundation health plan, inc678729604-10Premium november 2018085-0000-202.21-397,941.857,941.8512317110/19/2018Karl's tractor service5458Weed abatement010-7100-410.34-052,225.002,225.0012317210/19/2018Ktua planning & landscape architect30516REVServices provided aug'18199-9999-425.40-0115,073.7515,073.7512317310/19/2018League of california cities2247Division meeting 9/12/18010-1100-411.31-2040.0040.0012317410/19/2018Lucille fergusonREQUEST 100218Refund water deposit050-0000-229.08-70141.67141.6712317510/19/2018Martinez, ramonREQUEST 100418Reimburse h/d/v expense010-2500-425.11-9080.0080.0012317610/19/2018Master care commercial janitorial7021Janitorial srvc sept 2018010-2500-425.34-051,100.001,100.0012317710/19/2018Mb painting10132018Painting service034-3200-431.33-102,450.002,450.0012317810/19/2018Minuteman press, inc.41919Weekly enrollment notices048-1400-414.36-10161.36161.3612317910/19/2018Monarch landscape llc, inc.9031Maintenance sept 2018305-8831-500.34-05650.0018,925.009031Maintenance sept 2018306-8831-500.34-05300.009031Maintenance sept 2018306-8831-500.34-05100.009031Maintenance sept 2018341-8831-500.34-05800.009031Maintenance sept 2018341-8831-500.34-05100.009031Maintenance sept 2018353-8831-500.34-05400.009031Maintenance sept 2018355-8831-500.34-05400.009031Maintenance sept 2018365-8831-500.34-05100.009031Maintenance sept 2018365-8831-500.34-0575.009031Maintenance sept 2018025-7100-410.34-05400.009031Maintenance sept 2018025-7250-410.34-05200.003.A.3.aPacket Pg. 32Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 25Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123179...10/19/2018...Monarch landscape llc, inc....9031Maintenance sept 2018303-8831-500.34-051,400.0018,925.00...9031Maintenance sept 2018307-8831-500.34-051,850.009031Maintenance sept 2018307-8831-500.34-05100.009031Maintenance sept 2018311-8831-500.34-051,300.009031Maintenance sept 2018311-8831-500.34-05100.009031Maintenance sept 2018325-8831-500.34-05800.009031Maintenance sept 2018327-8831-500.34-051,400.009031Maintenance sept 2018327-8831-500.34-05100.009031Maintenance sept 2018329-8831-500.34-051,100.009031Maintenance sept 2018329-8831-500.34-05100.009031Maintenance sept 2018338-8831-500.34-051,900.009031Maintenance sept 2018351-8831-500.34-05250.009032Install mulch 3"thickness303-8831-500.34-055,000.0012318010/19/2018Nacho's automotive electric018925Parts & labor unit 617010-7101-410.33-50186.63186.6312318110/19/2018National safety compliance, inc.74513Dqf online driver fee050-9000-450.34-057.50118.9574513Dqf online driver fee010-4150-410.34-055.0074513Dqf online driver fee010-4140-410.34-052.5074513Dqf online driver fee055-4170-450.34-052.5074513Dqf online driver fee010-7100-410.34-052.5074685D.o.t. certified test050-9000-450.34-0598.9512318210/19/2018Nbs local government solutions, inc9180000515Cfd quarterly admin fees201-8850-500.30-90942.8034,400.909180000515Cfd quarterly admin fees034-8850-500.30-902,502.219180000516Cfd quarterly admin fees045-8800-450.30-902,826.129180000517Llpd-1 qrtly admin fees025-7250-410.30-90596.109180000517Llpd-1 qrtly admin fees025-7251-410.30-90596.109180000517Llpd-1 qrtly admin fees025-7252-410.30-90596.109180000517Llpd-1 qrtly admin fees025-7260-410.30-90596.109180000517Llpd-1 qrtly admin fees025-7100-410.30-90596.119180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees301-8831-500.30-90779.149180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees302-8831-500.30-90276.969180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees303-8831-500.30-90210.009180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees304-8831-500.30-90112.613.A.3.aPacket Pg. 33Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 26Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123182...10/19/2018...Nbs local government solutions, inc...9180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees305-8831-500.30-90197.8334,400.90...9180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees306-8831-500.30-90200.879180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees307-8831-500.30-90757.849180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees308-8831-500.30-901,025.679180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees309-8831-500.30-90675.669180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees310-8831-500.30-90538.709180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees311-8831-500.30-90383.489180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees312-8831-500.30-909.139180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees313-8831-500.30-90517.409180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees314-8831-500.30-903.049180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees315-8831-500.30-903.049180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees316-8831-500.30-9057.839180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees317-8831-500.30-9091.319180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees318-8831-500.30-909.139180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees319-8831-500.30-9024.359180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees319-8832-500.30-906.099180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees320-8831-500.30-90404.799180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees321-8831-500.30-90444.359180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees322-8831-500.30-90407.839180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees323-8831-500.30-90249.579180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees324-8831-500.30-903.049180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees325-8831-500.30-90313.489180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees326-8831-500.30-90897.849180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees327-8831-500.30-90800.459180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees328-8831-500.30-906.099180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees329-8831-500.30-90435.229180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees331-8831-500.30-90185.659180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees332-8831-500.30-90398.709180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees333-8831-500.30-90313.489180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees334-8831-500.30-90194.799180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees335-8831-500.30-90222.189180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees336-8831-500.30-90255.663.A.3.aPacket Pg. 34Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 27Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123182...10/19/2018...Nbs local government solutions, inc...9180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees337-8831-500.30-90143.0534,400.90...9180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees338-8831-500.30-90596.539180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees339-8831-500.30-90280.009180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees340-8831-500.30-9039.579180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees341-8831-500.30-90276.969180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees342-8831-500.30-90109.579180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees343-8831-500.30-90617.839180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees345-8831-500.30-90770.019180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees346-8831-500.30-90426.099180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees348-8831-500.30-903.049180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees351-8831-500.30-9030.449180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees352-8831-500.30-9027.399180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees353-8831-500.30-90328.709180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees354-8831-500.30-903.049180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees355-8831-500.30-90420.019180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees359-8831-500.30-9021.309180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees362-8831-500.30-90173.489180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees363-8831-500.30-90353.059180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees364-8831-500.30-9015.229180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees365-8831-500.30-9088.269180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees366-8831-500.30-9066.969180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees367-8831-500.30-90106.529180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees368-8831-500.30-9030.449180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees373-8831-500.30-903.049180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees375-8831-500.30-906.099180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees376-8831-500.30-90976.979180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees385-8831-500.30-903.049180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees386-8831-500.30-909.139180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees388-8831-500.30-903.049180000518Llpd-2 qrtly admin fees389-8831-500.30-90109.57918000849Bad qrtly admin fees701-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees702-4150-500.30-90179.983.A.3.aPacket Pg. 35Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 28Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123182...10/19/2018...Nbs local government solutions, inc...918000849Bad qrtly admin fees703-4150-500.30-90179.9834,400.90...918000849Bad qrtly admin fees704-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees705-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees706-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees707-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees709-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees710-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees711-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees712-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees713-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees714-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees715-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees716-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees717-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees718-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees719-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees720-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees721-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees724-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees728-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees733-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees735-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees736-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees736-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees737-4150-500.30-90179.98918000849Bad qrtly admin fees739-4150-500.30-90293.36918000623Annex aldi project033-0000-229.07-001,172.45918000624Community facilities040-0000-229.07-001,372.4512318310/19/2018Nutrien ag solutions,inc(crop prod)37509039Makaze, turf trax010-4140-410.21-14493.35986.7137509039Makaze, turf trax010-4150-410.21-14493.3612318410/19/2018O'reilly auto parts,inc.5531-279260Battery 3yr warr unit 351050-9000-450.33-50131.51171.365531-279926Motor oil,funnel unit 301050-9000-450.33-5039.853.A.3.aPacket Pg. 36Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 29Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total12318510/19/2018Office team51872792W/e 9/28/18, r. haley050-1400-414.10-04862.401,724.8051945315W/e 10/5/18, r. haley050-1400-414.10-04862.4012318610/19/2018Pereida, salvadorREQUEST 100918Reimb wtr oper maint prog010-4140-410.31-20162.53162.5312318710/19/2018Pins and needles embroidery12376Uniform caps010-3320-431.21-3530.9930.9912318810/19/2018Pip printing14601638 sets199-9999-425.40-0132.4232.4212318910/19/2018Plumbers depot, inc.PD-39759Fiberglass poles, misc.010-4140-410.21-80812.91812.9112319010/19/2018Preferred benefit insurance admin.EIA25769Premium october 2018085-0000-202.21-323,775.403,878.00EIA25769Cobra premium october '18065-0000-201.08-64102.6012319110/19/2018Press enterprise0011177333Legal advertising199-9999-425.40-01506.00871.200011177340Legal advertising011-1700-417.36-25270.600011177849Legal advertising010-1110-411.36-2594.6012319210/19/2018Probity automotive specialists,inc.13456Parts, labor unit 301050-9000-450.33-50774.881,052.1213496Parts, labor unit 954010-4150-410.33-5052.8613504Parts, labor unit 622010-7100-410.33-5087.1713513Battery unit 994011-3300-431.33-5040.0013516Oil, filer, oil change010-7100-410.33-5097.2112319310/19/2018R.a.rispalje construction140Weed abatement363-8831-500.34-052,222.003,609.68141Irrigation repair363-8831-500.34-05137.68142One time maintenance351-8831-500.34-051,250.0012319410/19/2018Ralph partners ii, llcREQUEST 100218Refund water deposit050-0000-229.08-70111.23111.2312319510/19/2018Ramirez, andyREQUEST 100918Reimburse h/d/v expense010-2500-425.11-9030.0030.0012319610/19/2018Ramirez, ritaREQUEST 100118Reimburse h/d/v expense010-2500-425.11-9041.3141.3112319710/19/2018Ramon's plumbing10032018Faucet installtion010-3100-431.34-05410.00410.0012319810/19/2018Rex beckREQUEST 100218Refund water deposit050-0000-229.08-70183.97183.9712319910/19/2018Riverside countyTL0000014308Signal light maint aug'18010-4150-410.32-0536,499.9736,499.9712320010/19/2018Rk engineering group, inc.180704Services for july 2018199-9999-425.40-012,000.0010,000.00180705Services for july 2018199-9999-425.40-011,200.00180803Services for aug 2018199-9999-425.40-014,500.00180804Services for aug 2018199-9999-425.40-012,300.0012320110/19/2018Robert renshawREQUEST 100218Refund water deposit050-0000-229.08-7034.2134.2112320210/19/2018Romeril plumbing & hardware15007Misc plumbing & supplies010-7100-410.21-12102.101,142.923.A.3.aPacket Pg. 37Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 30Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123202...10/19/2018...Romeril plumbing & hardware...15008Misc plumbing & supplies010-7101-410.21-1232.261,142.92...15018Misc plumbing & supplies050-9000-450.21-1281.2815020Misc plumbing & supplies010-4140-410.21-1292.9915029Misc plumbing & supplies010-7100-410.21-12284.6415041Misc plumbing & supplies034-3200-431.33-1013.9515046Misc plumbing & supplies010-7100-410.21-12114.6415047Misc plumbing & supplies010-4150-410.21-1275.9515050Misc plumbing & supplies050-9000-450.21-1251.2615067Misc plumbing & supplies010-7100-410.21-1226.8915032Misc plumbing & supplies010-3320-431.34-05230.5915032Misc plumbing & supplies199-9999-425.40-0136.3712320310/19/2018Samano, pabloREQUEST 100418Reimburse h/d/v expense010-2500-425.11-9026.7326.7312320410/19/2018Southern california assocation of07012018Dues assessment fy 18-19010-2500-425.31-254,910.004,910.0012320510/19/2018Southern california edisonREQUEST 101618Electricity service010-2500-425.35-141,753.665,948.93REQUEST 101618Electricity service010-4200-410.35-14191.45REQUEST 101618Electricity service010-7100-410.35-14256.40REQUEST 101618Electricity service025-7100-410.35-1455.77REQUEST 101618Electricity service025-7252-410.35-14-25.33REQUEST 101618Electricity service025-7260-410.35-14133.68REQUEST 101618Electricity service034-3200-431.35-14876.38REQUEST 101618Electricity service050-9000-450.35-14729.07REQUEST 101618Electricity service301-8831-500.35-1447.74REQUEST 101618Electricity service307-8831-500.35-1475.91REQUEST 101618Electricity service308-8831-500.35-1434.72REQUEST 101618Electricity service320-8831-500.35-1466.36REQUEST 101618Electricity service326-8831-500.35-14156.50REQUEST 101618Electricity service329-8831-500.35-1424.27REQUEST 101618Electricity service345-8831-500.35-14187.51REQUEST 101618Electricity service346-8831-500.35-1426.09REQUEST 101618Electricity service355-8831-500.35-1437.37REQUEST 101618Electricity service359-8831-500.35-1424.36REQUEST 101618Electricity service365-8831-500.35-1425.703.A.3.aPacket Pg. 38Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 31Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123205...10/19/2018...Southern california edison...REQUEST 101618Electricity service346-8831-500.35-1492.015,948.93...REQUEST 101618Electricity service010-4150-410.35-14657.26REQUEST 101618Electricity service010-4150-410.35-14-0.02REQUEST 101618Electricity service025-7260-410.35-1418.78REQUEST 101618Electricity service301-8831-500.35-1410.73REQUEST 101618Electricity service308-8831-500.35-143.94REQUEST 101618Electricity service319-8832-500.35-144.28REQUEST 101618Electricity service327-8831-500.35-144.75REQUEST 101618Electricity service330-8831-500.35-144.14REQUEST 101618Electricity service334-8831-500.35-140.53REQUEST 101618Electricity service335-8831-500.35-140.61REQUEST 101618Electricity service336-8831-500.35-140.70REQUEST 101618Electricity service337-8831-500.35-140.39REQUEST 101618Electricity service339-8831-500.35-140.77REQUEST 101618Electricity service340-8831-500.35-143.94REQUEST 101618Electricity service342-8831-500.35-140.30REQUEST 101618Electricity service346-8831-500.35-143.94REQUEST 101618Electricity service347-8831-500.35-142.35REQUEST 101618Electricity service349-8831-500.35-142.35REQUEST 101618Electricity service350-8831-500.35-144.75REQUEST 101618Electricity service351-8831-500.35-1413.10REQUEST 101618Electricity service357-8831-500.35-143.94REQUEST 101618Electricity service359-8831-500.35-1410.73REQUEST 101618Electricity service365-8831-500.35-14328.39REQUEST 101618Electricity service366-8831-500.35-144.14REQUEST 101618Electricity service374-8831-500.35-144.14REQUEST 101618Electricity service376-8831-500.35-144.75REQUEST 101618Electricity service308-8831-500.35-145.44REQUEST 101618Electricity service319-8832-500.35-146.08REQUEST 101618Electricity service327-8831-500.35-146.50REQUEST 101618Electricity service330-8831-500.35-146.03REQUEST 101618Electricity service340-8831-500.35-145.443.A.3.aPacket Pg. 39Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 32Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123205...10/19/2018...Southern california edison...REQUEST 101618Electricity service346-8831-500.35-145.445,948.93...REQUEST 101618Electricity service350-8831-500.35-146.50REQUEST 101618Electricity service351-8831-500.35-1420.20REQUEST 101618Electricity service357-8831-500.35-145.44REQUEST 101618Electricity service366-8831-500.35-146.03REQUEST 101618Electricity service374-8831-500.35-146.03REQUEST 101618Electricity service376-8831-500.35-146.5012320610/19/2018Star auto parts212247Supplies050-9000-450.21-1217.23171.3021226924 mo warranty battery011-3300-431.33-50154.0712320710/19/2018State of california dept of justice328747Analysis august 2018010-3100-431.34-05280.00280.0012320810/19/2018Steno solutions, inc.431457 reports sept 2018010-3100-431.34-0581.9081.9012320910/19/2018Stetson engineers inc.1935-1013Services august 2018050-9000-450.34-051,836.183,062.681935-1604Services august 2018050-9000-450.34-051,226.5012321010/19/2018Time warner cable0543731100118Services 10/10 -11/9/2018017-2290-418.34-20379.05379.0512321110/19/2018Time warner cable -city hall acct066798501100118Service october 2018017-2290-418.34-20627.68627.6812321210/19/2018Tony's tires09262018Tire patch unit 301050-9000-450.33-5015.0025.0010082018Tire plug - golf cart050-9000-450.33-5010.0012321310/19/2018Tri lake consultants, inc.43955Services august 2018199-9999-425.40-011,650.003,737.5044015Services august 2018199-9999-425.40-012,087.5012321410/19/2018U.s. healthworks medical group, pc3400986-CABreath alco test/b. eichp050-9000-450.34-0539.00237.003400986-CAPe-dot / d. figueroa050-9000-450.34-0599.003400986-CAPe-dot / j. villarroel010-4150-410.34-0599.0012321510/19/2018Underground service alert920180665Sept 2018 tickets050-9000-450.34-05110.65110.6512321610/19/2018Valley diesel1040Labor, parts - unit 452010-4150-410.33-50349.94574.941048Bit inspection unit 502010-4140-410.33-5075.001049Bit inspection unit 480010-4150-410.33-5075.001050Bit inspection unit 416010-4150-410.33-5075.0012321710/19/2018Vortex industries, inc.05-1281810Repair rolling srvc doors034-3200-431.33-10871.43871.4312321810/19/2018West coast arborists, inc140883Tree service305-8831-500.34-051,836.0033,486.00140881Tree service025-7252-410.34-054,074.00140879Tree service306-8831-500.34-051,350.003.A.3.aPacket Pg. 40Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 33Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123218...10/19/2018...West coast arborists, inc...140878Tree service338-8831-500.34-051,728.0033,486.00...140876Tree service329-8831-500.34-052,376.00140875Tree service307-8831-500.34-054,320.00140873Tree service326-8831-500.34-051,080.00140874Tree service345-8831-500.34-052,496.00140871Tree service308-8831-500.34-054,062.00140870Tree service322-8831-500.34-054,224.00140868Tree service325-8831-500.34-05810.00140869Tree service362-8831-500.34-051,998.00140867Tree service359-8831-500.34-053,132.0012321910/19/2018Western riverside council219Clean cities coalition063-4150-410.30-906,000.006,000.0012322010/19/2018Yarnall, reneREQUEST 100418Reimburse h/d/v expense010-2500-425.11-9020.00379.01REQUEST 101118Reimb meal,mileage,park010-9600-960.31-20359.0112322110/26/2018Arrow printing, inc.18059Notice of violation forms010-3320-431.36-101,439.841,439.8412322210/26/2018Bank of america business cardREQUEST 102218Delta airlines010-9600-960.31-20466.406,033.07REQUEST 102218Icsc conference registra010-9600-960.31-201,750.00REQUEST 102218Westin hotel mn010-9600-960.31-201,752.47REQUEST 102218Travel insurance policy010-9600-960.31-2031.48REQUEST 102218Westin hotel long beach010-1100-411.31-20495.62REQUEST 102218Westin hotel long beach010-1110-411.31-20495.62REQUEST 102218Embassy suites010-1100-411.31-20571.48REQUEST 102218Icsc research conn conf010-9600-960.31-20470.0012322310/26/2018Bank of america business cardREQUEST 102218Facebook advertising010-9600-960.36-1525.006,672.15REQUEST 102218League of ca registration010-1100-411.31-20575.00REQUEST 102218Westin hotel010-1200-412.31-20591.62REQUEST 102218Global experience010-9600-960.31-202,825.75REQUEST 102218Global experience010-9600-960.31-20484.50REQUEST 102218Facebook advertising010-9600-960.36-1550.00REQUEST 102218Inland emp econ forecast010-1200-412.31-20161.50REQUEST 102218Inland emp econ forecast010-1200-412.31-20455.50REQUEST 102218Facebook advertising010-9600-960.36-1520.08REQUEST 102218Global experience010-9600-960.31-20833.203.A.3.aPacket Pg. 41Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 34Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123223...10/26/2018...Bank of america business card...REQUEST 102218League of ca reistration010-1200-412.31-20650.006,672.15...12322410/26/2018Bowman signs18035Frosted vinyl windows010-2500-425.33-10609.87609.8712322510/26/2018California dept of tax & fee adminREQUEST 102218Elec eng surchg july-sept048-0000-203.22-1016,997.0916,997.0912322610/26/2018Carlson & associates, llc293Sgc services sept 2018199-9999-425.40-012,626.402,626.4012322710/26/2018Circle of safe-t, inc.700Sart exam010-3100-431.30-901,200.001,200.0012322810/26/2018Crime scene cleaners20182609Remove/dispose biohazard010-3100-431.34-05750.00750.0012322910/26/2018David leonard associates20181001Srvcs provided sept 2018065-0000-211.21-012,250.397,354.0120181002Srvcs provided sept 2018065-0000-211.21-011,575.3920181003Srvcs provided sept 2018065-0000-211.21-011,165.4920181004Srvcs provided sept 2018065-0000-201.06-20286.8920181004Srvcs provided sept 2018065-0000-211.21-01303.7920181005Srvcs provided sept 2018065-0000-201.06-201,029.4820181006Srvcs provided sept 2018065-0000-211.21-01236.2920181007Srvcs provided sept 2018065-0000-201.06-20506.2912323010/26/2018Destiny rubio10222018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-20174.76174.7612323110/26/2018Eastern municipal water districtREQUEST 102318Water service010-7100-410.35-1075.4311,677.13REQUEST 102318Water service025-7250-410.35-10510.02REQUEST 102318Water service310-8831-500.35-10845.79REQUEST 102318Water service311-8831-500.35-104,818.82REQUEST 102318Water service331-8831-500.35-10375.66REQUEST 102318Water service339-8831-500.35-1061.49REQUEST 102318Water service376-8831-500.35-104,989.9212323210/26/2018Eichperger, bertrandREQUEST 102218Reimburse class b drv lic050-9000-450.31-2076.0076.0012323310/26/2018Fedex corporation6-329-13720Delivery service010-2510-425.40-1257.53337.146-329-13720Delivery service011-1700-417.21-6532.056-329-13720Delivery service011-3300-431.21-6539.566-336-25048Delivery service011-1700-417.21-6525.366-336-25048Delivery service011-3300-431.21-6539.566-343-17579Delivery service011-3300-431.21-6575.746-343-17579Delivery service011-1700-417.21-6541.866-343-17579Delivery service011-1700-417.21-6525.483.A.3.aPacket Pg. 42Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 35Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total12323410/26/2018Frontier communicationsREQUEST 102318Phone service010-2500-425.35-16106.24212.08REQUEST 102318Phone service050-9000-450.35-16105.8412323510/26/2018Hosopo corporationREQUEST 102318Refund permit # 18-00932011-0000-303.02-21266.76297.59REQUEST 102318Refund permit # 18-00932011-0000-308.06-3030.8312323610/26/2018Imelda day10222018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-2010.3510.3512323710/26/2018Jason r jordan10222018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-20101.15101.1512323810/26/2018Lewis carroll10222018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-20138.76138.7612323910/26/2018Lydia bergstrom10222018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-20123.32123.3212324010/26/2018Melanie s medina10222018Double sce's nem rate!048-0000-203.22-20152.72152.7212324110/26/2018Meza, ivanREQUEST 102218Reimb coll sys maint exam055-4170-450.31-20185.00185.0012324210/26/2018O'reilly auto parts,inc.5531-275465Motor oil024-3100-431.33-5032.2932.2912324310/26/2018Office team51806868W/e 9/14/2018, r. haley050-1400-414.10-04646.802,662.6651822000W/e 9/21/2018, r. haley050-1400-414.10-04722.2651997574W/e 10/12/2018, r. haley050-1400-414.10-04646.8052021490W/e 10/19/2018, r. haley050-1400-414.10-04646.8012324410/26/2018Public trust advisors, llc3493Services 7/1 - 9/30/2018010-2500-425.30-902,063.782,063.7812324510/26/2018Regional government services8917Contract services sept'18010-1210-412.34-053,185.004,685.008972Contract services sept'18010-1210-412.34-051,500.0012324610/26/2018Riverside, county ofREQUEST 102318Collected parking fees010-0000-304.03-351,635.001,635.0012324710/26/2018Ruiz, crystalREQUEST 102218Meal per diem010-1100-411.31-20260.00260.0012324810/26/2018San jacinto petty cash, city ofREQUEST 102418Stater bros010-2500-425.21-10187.93251.17REQUEST 102418Stater bros010-1100-411.31-2063.2412324910/26/2018Scott shaffer1205Sotc program & posters010-2510-425.40-143,460.323,964.311205Sj business card redesign010-2500-425.30-90503.9912325010/26/2018Socal gasREQUEST 102218Gas service010-6500-425.35-128.6589.27REQUEST 102218Gas service010-3100-431.35-1237.41REQUEST 102218Gas service010-4200-410.35-122.83REQUEST 102218Gas service034-3200-431.35-1240.3812325110/26/2018Southern california edisonREQUEST 102318Electricity service010-4150-410.35-1468.02306.79REQUEST 102318Electricity service010-4150-410.35-14203.56REQUEST 102318Electricity service010-4150-410.35-14-0.013.A.3.aPacket Pg. 43Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 36Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123251...10/26/2018...Southern california edison...REQUEST 102318Electricity service347-8831-500.35-144.17306.79...REQUEST 102318Electricity service360-8831-500.35-148.99REQUEST 102318Electricity service347-8831-500.35-148.37REQUEST 102318Electricity service360-8831-500.35-1413.6912325210/26/2018Time warner cable0055371100218Srvcs 10/10-11/9/2018010-3100-431.34-05261.66261.6612325310/26/2018Time warner cable0541420101718Srvcs 10/27-11/26/2018017-2290-418.34-201,650.121,650.1212325410/26/2018United healthcare insurance co.,inc0033649997Premium november 2018085-0000-202.21-3943,496.9843,496.9812325510/26/2018Utz, russellREQUEST 101718Replc ck # 118561, 6/9/17065-0000-201.08-79201.69201.6912325610/26/2018Verizon wireless9816563168Staff cell phone service010-1100-411.35-17170.494,720.079816563168Staff cell phone service010-1200-412.35-1741.329816563168Staff cell phone service010-1210-412.35-1741.679816563168Staff cell phone service011-1700-417.35-1769.439816563168Staff cell phone service010-3100-431.35-1725.359816563168Staff cell phone service011-3300-431.35-1740.979816563168Staff cell phone service010-3320-431.35-17351.859816563168Staff cell phone service010-4140-410.35-1781.829816563168Staff cell phone service010-4150-410.35-17147.699816563168Staff cell phone service010-4200-410.35-1760.519816563168Staff cell phone service010-7100-410.35-17170.269816563168Staff cell phone service010-7101-410.35-1713.919816563168Staff cell phone service017-2290-418.35-17206.239816563168Staff cell phone service050-1400-414.35-179.029816563168Staff cell phone service050-4200-410.35-173.499816563168Staff cell phone service050-9000-450.35-17277.869816563168Staff cell phone service055-1400-414.35-172.259816563168Staff cell phone service055-4170-450.35-17128.979816563168Staff cell phone service055-4200-410.35-171.749816563168Staff cell phone service010-9600-960.35-1718.799816563168Staff cell phone service010-2500-425.35-171.989816563168Staff cell phone service010-1200-412.21-8046.509816563168Staff cell phone service010-1210-412.21-80196.499816563168Staff cell phone service011-1700-417.21-80196.493.A.3.aPacket Pg. 44Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
Warrant RegisterCity of San Jacinto10/31/2018Page 37Check NumberCheck DateVendor NameInvoice NumberDescriptionAccount NumberTransactionAmountCheck Total123256...10/26/2018...Verizon wireless...9816563168Staff cell phone service010-4200-410.21-80167.024,720.07...9816563168Staff cell phone service017-2290-418.21-8057.119816563168Staff cell phone service050-4200-410.21-8019.659816563168Staff cell phone service050-9000-450.21-801,375.439816563168Staff cell phone service055-4170-450.21-80785.969816563168Staff cell phone service055-4200-410.21-809.8212325710/26/2018Walton, angelaREQUEST 101818Reimb meal,hotel,mileage010-1110-411.31-20249.06249.0612325810/26/2018White, kevinREQUEST 090718Reimb doj fingerprint fee010-1210-412.30-9057.0057.0012325910/26/2018Xerox financial services1336238Copier lease 10/5-11/4/18010-4200-410.34-05361.72361.7212326010/26/2018Zhen ling wangREQUEST 100218Replc ck#122084,6/29/2018050-0000-308.09-10128.70128.70Total Checks 1,172,065.073.A.3.aPacket Pg. 45Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
CITY OF SAN JACINTOELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER REPORTOctober 1-31, 2018DATE PAYEE AMOUNT REASON10/1/2018 CalPERS 22,182.44 Retirement Contributions10/1/2018 CalPERS 284.52 Health Premium10/3/2018 Total Funds/Hasler 2,000.00 Postage10/15/2018 CalPERS 22,822.66 Retirement Contributions10/17/2018 Paymentus 2,705.75 Payment Process Transaction fees for September 201810/25/2018 Direct Energy 1,141,839.70 SJ Power energy purchase10/25/2018 3 Phases Renewables 8,250.00 SJ Power energy purchase10/25/2018 High Desert Power 13,420.00 SJ Power energy purchase10/25/2018TransAlta Energy Mkting25,307.99 SJ Power energy purchase10/25/2018 City of Lancaster 85,684.90 SJ Power admin fees & energy purchase10/29/2018 CalPERS 23,241.39 Retirement Contributions1,347,739.35 3.A.3.aPacket Pg. 46Attachment: Warrant Register October 31, 2018 (Warrants and Disbursements – October 2018)
November 20, 2018
TO: City Council
REQUESTED BY: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer
APPROVED BY: Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street to San Jacinto Avenue)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that City Council adopts the enclosed speed survey prepared by RK
Engineering Group, Inc.
DISCUSSION:
The City of San Jacinto received the Speed Survey from RK Engineering Group, Inc. for
Ramona Expressway between State Street and San Jacinto Avenue.
The survey records and measures vehicular traffic speeds and calculates the speed limit at the
85th percentile speed. In this case, the survey recommends 55 MPH speed limit (both directions)
to be implemented on Ramona Expressway between State Street and San Jacinto Avenue. The
report was prepared at the request of the Police Department to assist the department with
enforcement.
The existing posted speed limit on Ramona Expressway between State Street and Eagle road is
35 MPH; however, the 85th percentile speed in this segment is 55 MPH. New signage will be
posted along this segment to show the 55 MPH limit.
The existing posted speed limit on Ramona Expressway between Eagle Road and San Jacinto
Avenue is 55 MPH, and the 85th percentile speed in this segment is 55 MPH.
The result of the speed survey is that from State Street to Esplanade, along Ramona Expressway,
the speed limit will be 55 MPH. This will cause less confusion for vehicular traffic inside the
City limits and allow the San Jacinto Police Department to better enfor ce the speed of traffic.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Public Works Department will install appropriate signing at an estimated cost of $500 utilizing
Gas Tax funds.
ATTACHMENTS:
Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey
3.A.4
Packet Pg. 47
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
October 31, 2018
Habib Motlagh
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
170 Wilkerson Avenue, Suite D
Perris, CA 92570
Subject: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed
Surveys, City of San Jacinto
Dear Mr. Motlagh:
Introduction
RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) is pleased to provide this Engineering and Traffic
Survey along Ramona Expressway, from State Street to San Jacinto Avenue in the City of
San Jacinto. The location of the study area is shown in Exhibit A. Based on your request,
the City is interested in updating the Engineering and Traffic Surveys for the following two
(2) roadway segments:
Ramona Expressway, from State Street to Eagle Road; and
Ramona Expressway, from Eagle Road to San Jacinto Avenue.
The purpose of this Engineering and Traffic Survey is to provide details for traffic counts,
speed surveys, roadway evaluations and collision data/analysis for the specified roadway
segments in order to recommend the appropriate speed limit. The data collection,
methodology, analysis, findings, and recommendations are summarized within this report.
Existing Conditions
Ramona Expressway is a six-lane divided roadway between State Street and Eagle Road,
and a four-lane divided roadway between Eagle Road and San Jacinto Avenue. It is
classified as a limited access conventional highway on the City’s Circulation Element. The
land uses surrounding the study area include single family residential homes with no direct
access to driveways along Ramona Expressway, and a commercial shopping center with
direct access to one (1) driveway along the north side of Ramona Expressway. There are
also sidewalks along both the north and south sides of Ramona Expressway.
Both the intersection of Ramona Expressway at State Street and the intersection of Ramona
Expressway at San Jacinto Avenue are signalized intersections. Additionally, the
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RK 14057
Page 2
intermediary intersections of Ramona Expressway at Village at San Jacinto and Ramona
Expressway at Eagle Road are both signalized intersections.
The existing ADT (Average Daily Traffic) volumes along Ramona Expressway are 23,349
vehicles between State Street and Eagle Road and 22,548 vehicles between Eagle Road and
San Jacinto Avenue. The count worksheets for 24-hour directional volumes along the study
roadway segment are included in Appendix A.
The posted speed limit on Ramona Expressway is 35 mph west of Eagle Road and 55 mph
east of Eagle Road. Radar speed surveys were conducted along Ramona Expressway, both
west and east of Eagle Road. The 85th percentile speed on Ramona Expressway between
State Street and Eagle Road was 55 mph with a 10 mph pace speed of 45 to 54 mph. The
85th percentile speed on Ramona Expressway between Eagle Road and San Jacinto Avenue
was 59 mph with a 10 mph pace speed of 50 to 59 mph. As summarized on Table 1, these
speeds are higher than the existing posted speed limits along Ramona Expressway for the
corresponding roadway segments. The radar speed surveys are included in Appendix B.
The existing roadway conditions worksheets are included in Appendix C.
Survey Methodology
1. As described in the California Vehicle Code, the CA MUTCD (California Manual On
Uniform Traffic Control Devices) and CalTrans Policy Directive 09-04, data was
collected to determine existing speed characteristics for the two (2) roadway
segments along Ramona Expressway. These two (2) documents are included in
Appendix D.
2. All roadway surveys were to determine existing characteristics and land use.
3. Existing travel speeds were obtained by collecting speed characteristics along each
roadway segment.
4. Speed observations data was statistically calculated by computer to determine
average speed, 85th percentile speed, and 10 mph pace speed.
5. Three (3) years of collision data was tabulated for each roadway segment for
consideration of speed limit recommendations.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RK 14057
Page 3
Statistical Analysis
Field data was analyzed with a number of calculations performed by computer. Statistical
calculations were performed by 85th percentile speed or critical speed and 10 mph pace
speed and percentage of vehicles in the 10 mph pace speed. These terms are defined as
follows:
• 85th Percentile Speeds: Speeds at or below which 85% of the vehicles traveled. It is a
single most important measure used to determine which speeds should be posted.
• 10 mph Pace Speed: A 10 mph range within which the largest number of
observations fall. Typically 70% of the vehicles are contained in this range with 15%
above and 15% below. Properly set speed limits will maximize the vehicles in the 10
mph pace speed. One symptom of an inappropriate speed is a lower percentage in
the 10 mph pace speed.
Collision History
Accident data for a three-year period from 2015 through 2018 along the specified
segment was tabulated and reviewed. Collisions that occurred within 250 feet of the
intersections were excluded, with the exception of Ramona Expressway at Village at San
Jacinto. The total number of collisions was then divided by the existing traffic volume to
determine a collision rate per million vehicle miles of travel for the (MVMT) roadway
segment.
The calculated collision rate was compared to the average rate expected for similar
roadway segments throughout California. CalTrans, in conjunction with the Federal
Highway Administration, published 2015 Collision Data on California State Highways. This
publication was used to determine whether the accident rate along the roadway segment
was above average. An excerpt of this publication is included in Appendix E.
A total of seven (7) accidents occurred between State Street and Eagle Road within a three
(3) year period (2015-2018). The calculated rate for this roadway segment is 1.57, as
detailed in Table 2. The calculated rate is above the CalTrans expected collision rate of 1.25
(urban) for a conventional six-lane divided roadway.
A total of one (1) accident occurred between Eagle Road and San Jacinto Avenue within a
three (3) year period (2015-2018). The calculated rate for this roadway segment is 0.09, as
detailed in Table 2. The calculated rate is below the CalTrans expected collision rate of 1.41
(urban) for a conventional four-lane divided roadway.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RK 14057
Page 4
As a result, a total of eight (8) accidents occurred within the study area. Five (5) of the ten
collisions in the study area occurred within the intersection of Ramona Expressway at
Village at San Jacinto. The collision data for the eight (8) occurrences within the study area
are included in Appendix F. A full copy of the collision data is included in RK’s files.
Recommendations
When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment
of the 85th percentile speed of free flowing traffic, according to the California MUTCD
2014, including revision #1 and #2, as amended for use in California.
Experiences have shown that speed limits should be established near the 85th percentile
speed that represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the
upper limit of what is to be considered reasonable and prudent. The speed chosen for the
speed zoning should be a 5 mph increment.
It is important to note that the Vehicle Code by section 22358.5 emphasizes that only
hazards not readily apparent to the driver necessitate a downward speed zoning. It is
determined that the basic speed law is sufficient regulation as to such conditions. These
characteristics are considered along with the 85th percentile speed and collision experience
in recommending speed zone changes.
Table 1 lists the surveyed roadway segments with their calculated critical (85th percentile)
speed and 10 mph pace speed, and the recommended speed limit. The speed limit
recommendations are shown in Exhibit B and are described below:
1. Ramona Expressway between State Street and Eagle Road is classified as a limited
access conventional highway with a curb-to-curb width of 120 feet. The existing
posted speed limit on this segment is 35 mph. The recommended speed limit is 55
mph due to the 85th percentile speed and to be consistent with the speed limits on
the adjacent sections of roadways.
2. Ramona Expressway between Eagle Road and San Jacinto Avenue is classified as a
limited access conventional highway with a curb-to-curb width of 88 feet. The
existing posted speed limit on this segment is 55 mph. The recommended speed
limit is 55 mph due to the 85th percentile speed and 10 mph pace speed.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RK 14057
Page 5
Conclusions
RK has completed the Engineering and Traffic Survey for Ramona Expressway from State
Street to San Jacinto Avenue, per the latest California MUTCD and other applicable
guidelines and standards for setting speed limits. Based upon the results of this study, the
recommended speed limits for the two (2) segments within the City of San Jacinto are
illustrated in Exhibit B and summarized in Table 1. The collision rates for the study area
roadway segments are summarized in Table 2.
RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. appreciates this opportunity to work the CITY OF SAN
JACINTO and would be happy to discuss these recommendations further, at your earliest
convenience.
Sincerely,
RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
Robert Kahn, P.E. Elias Bandek, E.I.T.
Founding Principal Engineer I
Registered Civil Engineer 20285
Registered Traffic Engineer 0555
Attachments
RK:sl/rk14057.doc
JN:0328-2018-04
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Exhibits
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Tables
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
ExistingSpeed LimitRecommendedSpeed Limit (MPH)85th PercentileSpeed1 (MPH)50th PercentileSpeed (MPH)10 mph PaceSpeed2 (MPH)Percent Within10 MPH PaceReason forChange35 55 55 48 45-54 63%85th Percentile Speed and adjacent roadway segment speed limits55 55 59 54 50-59 66%85th Percentile Speed and 10 mph Pace Speed12The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the vehicles traveled.The 10-mile per hour pace speed is the 10-mile per hour range within which the largest number of observations fall. Typically, 70 percent of the vehiclesare contained in this range, with 15 percent above and 15 percent below. Table 1Speed Survey SummaryRoadway Segment1. State Street to Eagle Road2. Eagle Road to San Jacinto AvenueRamona ExpresswayRK14057TBJN:0328-2018-043.A.4.aPacket Pg. 58Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona
Number of CollisionsNumber of MonthsLink Length (Miles)ADT1Collision Rate2CaltransBase Rate3Exceeds Caltrans Rate7 36 0.25 23,349 1.57 1.25 Yes1 36 0.51 22,548 0.09 1.41 No1 ADT = Average Daily Traffic2 Collisions per million vehicle miles traveled. Does not include collisions at the Ramona Expressway intersections with State Street, Eagle Road, and San Jacinto Avenue.3 Based on Caltrans publication 2015 Collision Data on California State Highways (Urban Conditions).1. State Street to Eagle RoadTable 2Collision Rate for Study Area Roadway SegmentsSegment 2. Eagle Road to San Jacinto AvenueRamona ExpresswayRK14057TBJN:0328-2018-043.A.4.aPacket Pg. 59Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Appendices
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
Appendix A
Traffic Counts Worksheets
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
Page 1
City of San Jacinto
Ramona Expressway
B/ State Street - Eagle Road
24 Hour Directional Volume Count
SJCRASTEA
Site Code: 105-18745
Counts Unlimited, Inc.
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: (951) 268-6268
email: counts@countsunlimited.com
Start 10/4/2018 Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals
Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon
12:00 34 142 23 141
12:15 36 157 16 140
12:30 27 187 18 139
12:45 24 145 121 631 6 167 63 587 184 1218
01:00 20 151 22 208
01:15 24 155 29 179
01:30 13 134 21 171
01:45 23 197 80 637 28 160 100 718 180 1355
02:00 22 178 26 166
02:15 21 183 26 165
02:30 19 192 36 200
02:45 25 199 87 752 31 184 119 715 206 1467
03:00 16 250 52 207
03:15 14 225 71 181
03:30 24 228 68 153
03:45 25 217 79 920 92 180 283 721 362 1641
04:00 16 238 133 193
04:15 17 241 105 169
04:30 27 221 112 147
04:45 46 229 106 929 137 156 487 665 593 1594
05:00 37 238 182 149
05:15 40 225 221 151
05:30 53 210 174 123
05:45 59 231 189 904 183 130 760 553 949 1457
06:00 70 230 231 162
06:15 94 230 245 119
06:30 175 219 257 106
06:45 172 209 511 888 229 96 962 483 1473 1371
07:00 117 169 292 103
07:15 113 155 347 96
07:30 152 146 292 87
07:45 139 145 521 615 274 74 1205 360 1726 975
08:00 118 148 221 81
08:15 105 139 159 80
08:30 112 116 191 88
08:45 86 110 421 513 159 60 730 309 1151 822
09:00 115 98 163 75
09:15 88 120 156 78
09:30 93 101 166 51
09:45 91 82 387 401 157 50 642 254 1029 655
10:00 111 67 153 59
10:15 98 97 147 36
10:30 115 72 139 45
10:45 104 62 428 298 148 32 587 172 1015 470
11:00 115 85 127 32
11:15 130 60 133 29
11:30 140 61 154 32
11:45 127 46 512 252 154 31 568 124 1080 376
Total 3442 7740 3442 7740 6506 5661 6506 5661 9948 13401
Combined
Total 11182 11182 12167 12167 23349
AM Peak -06:30 ---07:00 -----
Vol.-577 ---1205 -----
P.H.F. 0.824 0.868
PM Peak --04:00 ---02:30 ----
Vol.--929 ---772 ----
P.H.F. 0.964 0.932
Percentag
e 30.8%69.2% 53.5%46.5%
ADT/AADT ADT 23,349 AADT 23,349
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
Page 1
City of San Jacinto
Ramona Expressway
B/ State Street - San Jacinto Avenue
24 Hour Directional Volume Count
SJCRASTSJ
Site Code: 119-18672
Counts Unlimited, Inc
PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
Phone: 951-268-6268
email: counts@countsunlimited.com
Start 9/13/2018 Eastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals Combined Totals
Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon
12:00 35 161 23 134
12:15 37 161 23 129
12:30 37 161 9 171
12:45 23 175 132 658 11 215 66 649 198 1307
01:00 17 138 16 162
01:15 24 137 17 182
01:30 18 191 22 164
01:45 25 203 84 669 16 160 71 668 155 1337
02:00 23 156 23 145
02:15 15 159 32 173
02:30 9 199 28 185
02:45 27 226 74 740 35 199 118 702 192 1442
03:00 13 246 75 192
03:15 12 225 65 164
03:30 14 225 81 154
03:45 29 244 68 940 99 133 320 643 388 1583
04:00 20 225 127 145
04:15 20 206 119 130
04:30 30 230 132 150
04:45 41 221 111 882 171 152 549 577 660 1459
05:00 54 211 192 144
05:15 56 197 152 120
05:30 59 223 180 142
05:45 54 220 223 851 212 101 736 507 959 1358
06:00 64 187 233 112
06:15 112 166 236 111
06:30 183 206 274 96
06:45 242 163 601 722 318 77 1061 396 1662 1118
07:00 139 152 357 86
07:15 119 155 270 90
07:30 144 125 293 84
07:45 90 141 492 573 192 67 1112 327 1604 900
08:00 119 150 176 78
08:15 119 119 175 65
08:30 90 114 133 58
08:45 98 132 426 515 149 62 633 263 1059 778
09:00 106 104 172 59
09:15 98 100 141 53
09:30 101 103 128 38
09:45 98 81 403 388 146 39 587 189 990 577
10:00 85 99 119 40
10:15 112 80 141 45
10:30 129 64 135 33
10:45 115 84 441 327 125 28 520 146 961 473
11:00 116 48 136 30
11:15 140 53 129 30
11:30 157 57 124 20
11:45 132 44 545 202 147 25 536 105 1081 307
Total 3600 7467 3600 7467 6309 5172 6309 5172 9909 12639
Combined
Total 11067 11067 11481 11481 22548
AM Peak -06:30 ---06:45 -----
Vol.-683 ---1238 -----
P.H.F. 0.706 0.867
PM Peak --03:00 ---02:15 ----
Vol.--940 ---749 ----
P.H.F. 0.955 0.871
Percentag
e 32.5%67.5% 55.0%45.0%
ADT/AADT ADT 22,548 AADT 22,548
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
Appendix B
Radar Speed Surveys
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
MPHVehicles SurveyedTOT.Speed EB WBVEH.Location:Ramona Expressway650 0650641 064X1630 0630Between:State Street - Eagle Road620 162X1611 061X1601 060X1Weather:Clear592 259XXXX4582 058XX2571 157XX2Date:563 256XXXXX5550 255XX2544 654XXXXXXXXXX10*Time530 153X1*From:12:30522 352XXXXX5*511 351XXXX4PTime503 450XXXXXXX7ATo:1:30495 449XXXXXXXXX9C484 448XXXXXXXX8EExisting478 247XXXXXXXXXX10*Speed Limit:35MPH 462 146XXX3*451 545XXXXXX6*442 344XXXXX5433 143XXXX4422 242XXXX4410 141X1Eastbound StatisticsWestbound StatisticsCombined Statistics400 0400% Over Pace:16%30%19%390 0390380 0380% In Pace:66%62%63%370 0370361 236XXX3% Under Pace:18%8%18%351 035X1340 0340Average Speed:49MPH50MPH50MPH330 0330320 0320Pace Speed:45 - 54MPH43 - 52MPH45 - 54MPH310 0310300 0300290 029015th Percentile / Critical Speed:43 MPH43 MPH43 MPH280 0280270 027050th Percentile / Critical Speed:48 MPH49 MPH48 MPH260 0260250 025085th Percentile / Critical Speed:56 MPH54 MPH55 MPH240 0240230 0230220 0220210 0210200 0200190 0190180 0180170 0170160 0160150 0150Total50 50GRAND TOTALS100 Corona, CA 92880T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267Eastbound WestboundCity of San JacintoRadar Speed SurveyRadar Survey Conducted By:Counts Unlimited, Inc.PO Box 117810/4/183.A.4.aPacket Pg. 65Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona
MPHVehicles SurveyedTOT.Speed EB WBVEH.Location:Ramona Expressway652 165XXX3641 164XX2630 263XX2Between:State Street - San Jacinto Avenue622 162XXX3612 261XXXX4600 360XXX3Weather:Clear594 259XXXXXX6*584 658XXXXXXXXXX10*574 657XXXXXXXXXX10*Date:561 256XXX3P557 355XXXXXXXXXX10A546 354XXXXXXXXX9CTime533 353XXXXXX6EFrom:9:55521 152XX2*513 251XXXXX5*Time501 450XXXXX5*To:10:15491 249XXX3482 148XXX3Existing472 247XXXX4Speed Limit:55MPH 464 146XXXXX5450 145X1440 0440430 143X1420 0420410 0410400 0400% Over Pace:17%390 0390380 0380% In Pace:66%370 0370360 0360% Under Pace:17%350 0350340 0340Average Speed:55MPH330 0330320 0320Pace Speed:50 - 59MPH310 0310300 0300290 029015th Percentile / Critical Speed:48 MPH280 0280270 027050th Percentile / Critical Speed:54 MPH260 0260250 025085th Percentile / Critical Speed:59 MPH240 0240230 0230220 0220210 0210200 0200190 0190180 0180170 0170160 0160150 0150Total50 50GRAND TOTALS100 PO Box 1178Corona, CA 92880T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267City of San JacintoRadar Speed SurveyEastbound WestboundRadar Survey Conducted By:Counts Unlimited, Inc.9/18/183.A.4.aPacket Pg. 66Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona
Appendix C
Existing Roadway Conditions
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
ROADWAY: Ramona Expressway SEGMENT # 1 DATE: 10/22/2018
LIMITS: b/t State Street and Eagle Road JOB NO.: 0328-2018-04
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL (Circle one): EB WB
A. Roadway Characteristics
1. Total Curb to Curb Street width (feet) 120' (1)
2. Number of through travel lanes by direction 3 (1)
3. Median Type (P = Painted, R = Raised) R (1)
4. On-street parking (Y/N) N (1)
5. Speed limit (mph) 35 (1)
6. Surrounding land uses Residential Commercial/Residential
7. Does surrounding land use have direct access N (1)
8. Frequency of driveways (frequent, rare, none) rare (1)
9. Curb and gutter present Y (1)
10. Sidewalks present N Y
11. Street illumination midblock Y (1)
12. Street illumination at intersections Y (1)
13. Two-way daily traffic volume (ADT) 23,349 (1)
14. Length of segment (miles) 0.25 (1)
B. Speed Characteristics
1. 85th percentile speed (mph) 55 (1)
2. Average speed (mph) 50 (1)
3. 50th percentile speed (mph) 48 (1)
4. Range of speeds (mph) 35-64 (1)
5. 10 mile per hour pace speed (mph) 45-54 (1)
6. Percent in 10 miles per hour pace 63% (1)
C. Accident Analysis for preceding 3 years
1. Number of fatal accidents - - - -
2. Number of injury accidents - - - -
3. Number of property damage only accidents - - - -
4. Total number of accidents 7 (1)
5. Fatal accident rate per MVMT 1 - - - -
6. Injury accident rate per MVMT 1 - - - -
7. Property damage only accident rate per MVMT 1 - - - -
8. Total accident rate per MVMT 1 1.57 (1)
9. Is accident rate higher than Caltrans value?
(Suburban/Urban value = 1.17/1.48)
Y (1)
D. Other Special Conditions
1. Crosswalk - - (1)
2. School Crosswalk - - (1)
3. Vertical Curves - - (1)
4. Horizontal Curves - - (1)
5. School Speed Zone - - (1)
6. Other - - (1)
E. Recommended speed limit (mph) - - (1)
(1) = Data in left column is for both directions
1 MVMT = Million Vehicle Miles Traveled
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
Prepared By: Elias Bandek Reviewed By: Robert Kahn
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
ROADWAY: Ramona Expressway SEGMENT # 2 DATE: 10/22/2018
LIMITS: b/t Eagle Road and San Jacinto Avenue JOB NO.: 0328-2018-04
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL (Circle one): EB WB
A. Roadway Characteristics
1. Total Curb to Curb Street width (feet) 88' (1)
2. Number of through travel lanes by direction 2 (1)
3. Median Type (P = Painted, R = Raised) P (1)
4. On-street parking (Y/N) N (1)
5. Speed limit (mph) 55 (1)
6. Surrounding land uses Residential (1)
7. Does surrounding land use have direct access N (1)
8. Frequency of driveways (frequent, rare, none) None (1)
9. Curb and gutter present Y N
10. Sidewalks present Y N
11. Street illumination midblock N (1)
12. Street illumination at intersections Y (1)
13. Two-way daily traffic volume (ADT) 22,548 (1)
14. Length of segment (miles) 0.51 (1)
B. Speed Characteristics
1. 85th percentile speed (mph) 59 (1)
2. Average speed (mph) 55 (1)
3. 50th percentile speed (mph) 54 (1)
4. Range of speeds (mph) 43-65 (1)
5. 10 mile per hour pace speed (mph) 50-59 (1)
6. Percent in 10 miles per hour pace 66% (1)
C. Accident Analysis for preceding 3 years
1. Number of fatal accidents - - - -
2. Number of injury accidents - - - -
3. Number of property damage only accidents - - - -
4. Total number of accidents 1 (1)
5. Fatal accident rate per MVMT 1 - - - -
6. Injury accident rate per MVMT 1 - - - -
7. Property damage only accident rate per MVMT 1 - - - -
8. Total accident rate per MVMT 1 0.09 (1)
9. Is accident rate higher than Caltrans value?
(Suburban/Urban value = 1.44/1.45)
N (1)
D. Other Special Conditions
1. Crosswalk - - (1)
2. School Crosswalk - - (1)
3. Vertical Curves - - (1)
4. Horizontal Curves Y (1)
5. School Speed Zone - - (1)
6. Other Limited sight distance (1)
E. Recommended speed limit (mph) - - (1)
(1) = Data in left column is for both directions
1 MVMT = Million Vehicle Miles Traveled
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
SPEED STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FORM
Prepared By: Elias Bandek Reviewed By: Robert Kahn
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
Appendix D
CalTrans Policy Directive 09-04 and
California MUTCD 2014
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 78 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State
California MUTCD 2014 for Setting Speed Limits
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 133
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California)
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014
Part 2 – Signs
04 If used, the Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall be placed over the roadway at the crosswalk
location.
05 An In-Street or Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall not be placed in advance of the crosswalk to
educate road users about the State law prior to reaching the crosswalk, nor shall it be installed as an
educational display that is not near any crosswalk.
Guidance:
06 If an island (see Chapter 3I) is available, the In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign, if used, should be placed on
the island.
Option:
07 If a Pedestrian Crossing (W11-2) warning sign is used in combination with an In-Street or an Overhead
Pedestrian Crossing sign, the W11-2 sign with a diagonal downward pointing arrow (W16-7P) plaque may be
post-mounted on the right-hand side of the roadway at the crosswalk location.
Standard:
08 The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign and the Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall not be used at
signalized locations controlled approaches.
09 The STOP FOR legend shall only be used in States where the State law specifically requires that a
driver must stop for a pedestrian in a crosswalk.
10 The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign shall have a black legend (except for the red STOP or YIELD
sign symbols) and border on a white background, surrounded by an outer yellow or fluorescent yellow-
green background area (see Figure 2B-2). The Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall have a black legend
and border on a yellow or fluorescent yellow-green background at the top of the sign and a black legend and
border on a white background at the bottom of the sign (see Figure 2B-2).
11 Unless the In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign is placed on a physical island, the sign support shall be
designed to bend over and then bounce back to its normal vertical position when struck by a vehicle.
Support:
12 The Provisions of Section 2A.18 concerning mounting height are not applicable for the In-Street Pedestrian
Crossing sign.
Standard:
13 The top of an In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign shall be a maximum of 4 feet above the pavement
surface. The top of an In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign placed in an island shall be a maximum of 4 feet
above the island surface.
Option:
14 The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign may be used seasonably seasonally to prevent damage in winter because
of plowing operations, and may be removed at night if the pedestrian activity at night is minimal.
15 In-Street Pedestrian Crossing signs, Overhead Pedestrian Crossing signs, and Yield Here To (Stop Here For)
Pedestrians signs may be used together at the same crosswalk.
Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1)
Support:
00 The setting of speed limits can be controversial and requires a rational and defensible determination to maintain public
confidence. Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation
above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. As with most laws,
speed limits need to depend on the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of motorists. Speed limits cannot be set
arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect of the public.
Standard:
01 Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering
and traffic survey (E&TS) study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The
engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles.
02 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall display the limit established by law, ordinance,
regulation, or as adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering study. The speed limits
displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph.
Revised April 7, 2017
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 134
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California)
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014
Part 2 – Signs
03 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs, indicating speed limits for which posting is required by law, shall be located at
the points of change from one speed limit to another.
04 At the downstream end of the section to which a speed limit applies, a Speed Limit sign showing the next
speed limit shall be installed. Additional Speed Limit signs shall be installed beyond major intersections and
at other locations where it is necessary to remind road users of the speed limit that is applicable.
05 Speed Limit signs indicating the statutory speed limits shall be installed at entrances to the State and,
where appropriate, at jurisdictional boundaries in urban areas.
Support:
06 In general, the maximum speed limits applicable to rural and urban roads are established:
A. Statutorily – a maximum speed limit applicable to a particular class of road, such as freeways or city streets,
that is established by State law; or
B. As altered speed zones – based on engineering studies.
07 State statutory limits might restrict the maximum speed limit that can be established on a particular road,
notwithstanding what an engineering study might indicate.
Option:
08 If a jurisdiction has a policy of installing Speed Limit signs in accordance with statutory requirements only on
the streets that enter a city, neighborhood, or residential area to indicate the speed limit that is applicable to the
entire city, neighborhood, or residential area unless otherwise posted, a CITYWIDE (R2-5aP), NEIGHBORHOOD
(R2-5bP), or RESIDENTIAL (R2-5cP) plaque may be mounted above the Speed Limit sign and an UNLESS
OTHERWISE POSTED (R2-5P) plaque may be mounted below the Speed Limit sign (see Figure 2B-3).
Guidance:
09 A Reduced Speed Limit Ahead (W3-5 or W3-5a) sign (see Section 2C.38) should be used to inform road users
of a reduced speed zone where the speed limit is being reduced by more than 10 mph, or where engineering
judgment indicates the need for advance notice to comply with the posted speed limit ahead.
10 States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 10 years, in compliance
with CVC Section 40802 to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone
significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in
the number of travel lanes, changes in the configuration of bicycle lanes, changes in traffic control signal
coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes.
11 No more than three speed limits should be displayed on any one Speed Limit sign or assembly.
12 When a speed limit within a speed zone is posted, it should be within 5 mph of the 85th-percentile speed of free-
flowing traffic.
Standard:
12aWhen a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile
speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the two Options below.
Option:
1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in
compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. See Standard below for documentation requirements.
2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the
speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further
reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(b).
Standard:
12b If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the
conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The
reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.
Support:
12c The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:
Example 1. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a
location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the
37 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 135
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California)
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014
Part 2 – Signs
the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a
registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.
Example 2. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location
was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph
speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and
justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer.
Example 3. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location
was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35mph, the speed limit can be established at 30mph, but no further reductions
can be applied (which is allowed in the two examples above).
Standard:
12d Examples 1 and 2 for establishing posted speed limits shall apply to engineering and traffic surveys (E&TS)
performed on or after July 1, 2009 in accordance with Caltrans’ Traffic Operations Policy Directive Number 09-04
dated June 29, 2009.
Option:
12e After January 1, 2012, Example 3 may be used to establish speed limits. Refer to CVC 21400(b).
Support:
12f Any existing E&TS that was performed before July 1, 2009 in accordance with previous traffic control device standards is
not required to comply with the new criteria until it is due for reevaluation per the 5, 7 or 10 year criteria.
13 Speed studies for signalized intersection approaches should be taken outside the influence area of the traffic
control signal, which is generally considered to be approximately 1/2 mile, to avoid obtaining skewed results for
the 85th-percentile speed.
Support:
14 Advance warning signs and other traffic control devices to attract the motorist’s attention to a signalized
intersection are usually more effective than a reduced speed limit zone.
Guidance:
15 An advisory speed plaque (see Section 2C.08) mounted below a warning sign should be used to warn road
users of an advisory speed for a roadway condition. A Speed Limit sign should not be used for this situation.
Option:
16 Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following:
A. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance;
B. The pace;
C. Roadside development and environment;
D. Parking practices and pedestrian activity; and
E. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period.
17 Two types of Speed Limit signs may be used: one to designate passenger car speeds, including any nighttime
information or minimum speed limit that might apply; and the other to show any special speed limits for trucks and
other vehicles.
18 A changeable message sign that changes the speed limit for traffic and ambient conditions may be installed
provided that the appropriate speed limit is displayed at the proper times.
19 A changeable message sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be
installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit sign.
Guidance:
20 If a changeable message sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend YOUR SPEED XX MPH or
such similar legend should be displayed. The color of the changeable message legend should be a yellow legend
on a black background or the reverse of these colors.
Support:
21 Advisory Speed signs and plaques are discussed in Sections 2C.08 and 2C.14. Temporary Traffic Control Zone
Speed signs are discussed in Part 6. The WORK ZONE (G20-5aP) plaque intended for installation above a Speed
Limit sign is discussed in Section 6F.12. School Speed Limit signs are discussed in Section 7B.15.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 136
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California)
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014
Part 2 – Signs
22 Speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Sections 22348 through 22413; also,
pertinent sections are found in Sections 627 and 40802 and others referenced in this section. See Section 1A.11 for
information regarding this publication.
23 Refer to Part 6, Section 6C.01 for speed limit signs in temporary traffic control zones. Refer to Part 7 for speed limit signs
in school areas.
Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
Support:
24 CVC Section 627 defines the term “Engineering and traffic survey” and lists its requirements.
Standard:
25 An engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by Caltrans,
consideration of all of the following:
A. Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.
B. Collision records.
C. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
Guidance:
26 The E&TS should contain sufficient information to document that the required three items of CVC Section 627 are provided
and that other conditions not readily apparent to a driver are properly identified.
27 Prevailing speeds are determined by a speed zone survey. A speed zone survey should include:
A. The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should
not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.
B. Only one person is required for the field work. Speeds should be read directly from a radar or other electronic speed
measuring devices; or,
C. Devices, other than radar, capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free flowing
vehicles may be used.
D. A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section. If speeds
vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be required, with separate measurements for each
section. Locations for measurements should be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs.
E. Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays. If there is
difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.
F. The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing.
G. The surveyor and equipment should not affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended,
and the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible.
H. In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 vehicles in
each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.
I. Short speed zones of less than 0.5 miles should be avoided, except in transition areas.
J. Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.
K. Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable.
L. Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions.
Support:
28 Physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to the
driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. Refer to CVC 22358.5.
Option:
29 When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider all of the following findings:
A. Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property
contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
1. Upon one side of the highway, within 0.25 miles, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more
separate dwelling houses or business structures.
2. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of 0.25 miles the contiguous property fronting thereon
is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 137
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California)
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014
Part 2 – Signs
3. The portion of highway is larger than 0.25 miles but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures
to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph 1 or 2 above.
B. Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
30 The following two methods of conducting E&TS may be used to establish speed limits:
1. State Highways - The E&TS for State highways is made under the direction of the Caltrans District Traffic Engineer. The
data includes:
a. One copy of the Example of Speed Zone Survey Sheet (See Figure 2B-101(CA)) showing:
A north arrow
Engineer's station or post mileage
Limits of the proposed zones
Appropriate notations showing type of roadside development, such as “scattered business,” “solid residential,”
etc. Schools adjacent to the highway are shown, but other buildings need not be plotted unless they are a
factor in the speed recommendation or the point of termination of a speed zone.
Collision rates for the zones involved
Average daily traffic volume
Location of traffic signals, signs and markings
If the highway is divided, the limits of zones for each direction of travel
Plotted 85th percentile and pace speeds at location taken showing speed profile
b. A report to the District Director that includes:
The reason for the initiation of speed zone survey.
Recommendations and supporting reasons.
The enforcement jurisdictions involved and the recommendations and opinions of those officials.
The stationing or reference post in mileage at the beginning and ending of each proposed zone and any
intermediate equations. Location ties must be given to readily identifiable physical features.
2. City and County Through Highways, Arterials, Collector Roads and Local Streets.
a. The short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the
actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorists' speeds, one will be able to select a
speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that need to be considered include but are not limited
to: the most recent two-year collision record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation,
shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, and
pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.
b. Determination of Existing Speed Limits - Figures 2B-103(CA) & 2B-104(CA) show examples of data sheets which
may be used to record speed observations. Specific types of vehicles may be tallied by use of letter symbols in
appropriate squares.
31 In most situations, the short form for local streets and roads will be adequate; however, the procedure used on State
highways may be used at the option of the local agency.
Guidance:
32 The factors justifying a reduction below the 85th percentile speed for the posted speed limit are the same factors mentioned
above. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed zone
survey or the accompanying engineering report.
33 The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care as
studies have shown that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile generally results in an increase in collision
rates; in addition, this may make violators of a disproportionate number of the reasonable majority of drivers.
Support:
34 Generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver surfaces in collision histories.
35 Speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85th
percent of the traffic is moving. The 85th percentile speed is often referred to as the critical speed. Pace speed is defined as the
10 mph increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles (See Figure 2B-102(CA)). The lower limit of the pace is
plotted on the Speed Zone Survey Sheets as an aid in determining the proper zone limits. Speed limits higher than the 85th
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 138
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California)
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014
Part 2 – Signs
percentile are not generally considered reasonable and prudent. Speed limits below the 85th percentile do not ordinarily
facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and require constant enforcement to maintain compliance. Speed limits established on
the basis of the 85th percentile conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and
prudent, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals.
36 The majority of drivers comply with the basic speed law. Speed limits set at or near the 85th percentile speed provide law
enforcement officers with a limit to cite drivers who will not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent.
Further studies show that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile (Critical Speed) generally results in an
increase in collision rates.
Option:
37 When roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, as
indicated in collision records, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified. Concurrence and support of
enforcement officials are necessary for the successful operation of a restricted speed zone.
Guidance:
38 Speed zones of less than 0.5 miles and short transition zones should be avoided.
Signs
Standard:
39 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign shall be used to give notice of a prima facie or maximum speed limit except as
provided under Prima Facie Speed Limits in CVC 22352.
40 When used, the TRUCKS, 3 AXLES OR MORE 55 MAXIMUM (R6-3(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750
feet following each R2-1 sign.
41 The ALL VEHICLES WHEN TOWING 55 MAXIMUM (R6-4(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet
following the R6-3(CA) sign.
Guidance:
42 The R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed on highway segments where speeds in excess of 55 mph are
permitted.
Option:
43 The existing AUTOS WITH TRAILERS, TRUCKS 55 MAXIMUM (R6-1(CA)) sign may remain in place until it is knocked
down, damaged, stolen, vandalized, or otherwise reaches the end of its useful life.
44 The local California Highway Patrol office may be consulted to identify highway segments where enforcement is an issue.
On these segments early replacement of existing R6-1(CA) signs may be necessary.
Support:
45 Refer to CVC Section 22406 for types of vehicles subject to the 55 mph maximum speed limit.
Option:
46 The Speed Zone Ahead (R2-4(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used to inform the motorist of a reduced speed
zone.
Standard:
47 The R2-4(CA) sign shall always be followed by a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign installed at the beginning of the zone
where the reduced speed limit applies.
48 The End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign shall only be used to mark the end of a speed zone.
49 The R3(CA) sign shall not be used at a transition into a change in speed limits within a reduced zone.
Option:
50 The R3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used with the TRUCK (M4-4) plaque to mark the end of truck speed zones
on descending grades.
Standard:
51 Speed limit signs shall be placed at the beginning of all restricted speed zones.
Option:
52 Where speed zones are longer than 1 mile, intermediate signs may be placed at approximate 1 mile intervals. For three or
more lanes in each direction, dual installation may be used.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 139
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California)
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014
Part 2 – Signs
Standard:
53 The Speed Limit (R2-1) and End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) signs, as appropriate shall be placed at the end of all
restricted speed zones.
54 Freeways with 65 mph and those segments where a speed limit of 70 mph has been approved by Caltrans, with
approval by the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
At the segment entrance, R2-1 signs shall be installed right of traffic off of the right shoulder.
R2-1 signs shall also be installed off of the right shoulder only, throughout the segment, at a maximum of 25
mile intervals.
Option:
The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.
Standard:
The R6-3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign, both
at the beginning and throughout each 60, 65 or 70 mph segment.
The R6-4(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R6-3(CA) sign.
Option:
The SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT (R4-3) signs may be installed at locations where there is a tendency of the
motorists to drive in the left-hand lane(s) below the normal speed of traffic.
Standard:
Signs shall be placed in protected locations.
At the end of the 70/65 mph segment, R2-1 signs shall be installed off of the right shoulder.
55 Freeway segments where a 55 mph speed limit has been approved by Caltrans, with the approval of the California
Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder and left shoulder
where the median is of sufficient width to permit sign maintenance without lane closures.
Guidance:
Subsequent signs should then be posted on the right shoulder, on approximate 3 mile intervals, with no more than 3
interchanges between signs.
At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the
right shoulder.
56 Conventional highways with 55 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
Standard:
The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder.
Guidance:
Subsequent signs should then be posted on approximate 5 to 10 mile intervals and immediately after locations where
significant volumes of traffic enter the segment.
At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the
right shoulder.
Conventional highways with 65 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
The beginning of the segment should be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder.
Subsequent signs should then be posted at 5 to 10 mile intervals and after locations where significant volumes of traffic
enter the segment.
At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the
right shoulder.
Option:
57 Pavement markings with appropriate numerals (see Section 3B.21) may be used to supplement speed limit signs.
Standard:
58 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs giving maximum statewide speed limits for various types of vehicles
shall be installed on all State highways near the points of entrance into California.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 140
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California)
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014
Part 2 – Signs
Guidance:
59 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed in a location to be most effectively viewed by the
approaching motorists.
Standard:
60 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with posted speed limits of 65 mph or
70 mph at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.
Option:
61 The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.
Standard:
62 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed
limit of 65 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals.
63 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at
approximately 3 mile intervals with no more than 3 interchanges between signs.
64 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed
limit of 55 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals.
Speed Enforced Signs
Option:
65 The SPEED ENFORCED BY RADAR (R48(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used where the California Highway
Patrol has received authority to use radar and requests such signs.
Guidance:
66 One sign should be used in each direction at the beginning of the segment of roadway, and at intervening major route
intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.
Support:
67 The R48(CA) sign is a stand-alone sign intended to alert motorists that speed is enforced by radar on a particular segment
of roadway.
Option:
68 The RADAR ENFORCED (R48-1(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used in combination with the Speed Limit (R2-
1) sign on any roadway where law enforcement has the authority to use radar.
Guidance:
69 When used, the R48-1(CA) sign should be placed below the R2-1 sign, at the beginning of the segment of roadway and at
intervening major intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.
Option:
70 The SPEED ENFORCED BY AIRCRAFT (R48-2(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be placed, when requested by the
California Highway Patrol, on sections of highway regularly patrolled by aircraft.
Standard:
71 The R48-2(CA) sign shall be used for both directions of travel.
Guidance:
72 The R48-2(CA) sign should be placed at the beginning of the section and spaced at 25 mile intervals. See Figure 3B-
105(CA).
Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs
Option:
73 A Vehicle Speed Feedback sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed
in conjunction with a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
Standard:
74 If a Vehicle Speed Feedback sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend shall be YOUR SPEED XX.
The numerals displaying the speed shall be white, yellow, yellow-green or amber color on black background. When
activated, lights shall be steady-burn conforming to the provisions of CVC Sections 21466 and 21466.5. Vehicle Speed
Feedback signs shall not alternatively be operated as variable speed limit signs.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 141
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California)
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014
Part 2 – Signs
Guidance:
75 To the degree practical, numerals for displaying approach speeds should be similar font and size as numerals on the
corresponding Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
Option:
76 When used, the Vehicle Speed Feedback sign may be mounted on either a separate support or on the same support as
the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
77 In lieu of lights, legend may be retroreflective film for flip-disk systems.
78 The legend YOUR SPEED may be white on black plaque located above the changeable speed display.
Support:
79 Driver comprehension may improve when the Vehicle Speed Feedback Sign is mounted on the same support below the
Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
80 Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs are appropriate for use with advisory speed signs and with temporary signs in temporary
traffic control zones.
Basic Speed Law and Prima Facie Speed Limits – See CVC 22350 & 22352
Support:
81 The basic speed law states “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or
prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a
speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.”
Standard:
82 Prima facie speed limits are specific limits and shall apply unless changed based upon an engineering and traffic
survey (E&TS) and signs are posted that display the new speed limit.
Option:
83 Prima facie speed limits may be preempted by the basic speed law, when roadway, traffic or weather conditions warrant a
lower speed.
Use of Metric System Designations – See CVC 21351.3
Option:
84 Dual units for speed limits on signs may be placed on local streets and roads in both Metric and English units.
Guidance:
85 If used, dual unit speed limits should be rounded to the nearest 10 km/h for Metric and 5 mph for English units for posting
on signs on local streets and roads.
Support:
86 Refer to AASHTO’s Traffic Engineering Metric Conversion Factors. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this
publication.
Standard:
87 Metric speed limits shall not be placed on State highways. For use in this California MUTCD, 70 mph shall be
shown as a metric equivalent of 110 km/h, neither of which shall be used on any local street or road.
Legal Authority for Establishing Speed Limits
Support:
88 Delegation of legal authority to set speed limits on State highways is given to Caltrans District Directors. The District
Director of each transportation district is authorized to issue orders regulating the speed of traffic, up to 65 mph on State
highways. The Director of Caltrans retains the authority to approve variable, minimum, and maximum speeds up to 70 mph on
State freeways.
Standard:
89 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-101(CA) shall apply, unless changed upon the basis of an engineering and
traffic survey (E&TS).
Option:
90 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-102(CA) may apply, unless changed upon E&TS.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 142
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California)
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014
Part 2 – Signs
Variable Speed Limits on Freeways - See CVC 22355
Option:
91 The following speed limits may apply:
Whenever Caltrans determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that the safe and orderly
movement of traffic upon any freeway segment will be facilitated by the establishment of variable speed limits.
Caltrans may erect, regulate, and control signs upon the state highway which is a freeway, or any portion thereof, which,
if used, signs shall be designed to permit display of different speeds at various times of the day or night.
Such signs need not conform to the standards & specifications per CVC 21400, but if used, shall be of sufficient size and
clarity to give adequate notice of the applicable speed limit.
Minimum Speed Limits on State Highways - See CVC 22400
Option:
92 The following speed limits may apply:
Whenever Caltrans determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that slow speeds on any part of a
state highway consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, Caltrans may determine and declare
a minimum speed limit. Appropriate signs giving notice shall then be installed on that segment.
A motorist can be cited for stopping or impeding the normal and reasonable movement of traffic unless the stop is
necessary for safe operation and in compliance with the law.
Speed Traps
Support:
93 Refer to CVC 40802 for Speed Traps.
Standard:
94 A speed trap shall not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.
95 A section of highway shall be defined as a speed trap if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an
engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) within five years, and the enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of
radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects.
96 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using radar and all of the following criteria are met:
The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course
training.
The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National
Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.
97 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using laser or other electronic device (other than
radar) and all of the following criteria are met:
The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course
training.
The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 2 hours of additional approved certified training.
The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National
Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.
Option:
98 This time provision for an E&TS may be extended to ten years when all of the above conditions are met and no significant
changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or
traffic volume as determined by a registered engineer.
Truck Speed Zone on Descending Grades
Guidance:
99 Highway descending grades, if used for posting TRUCK Speed Limit signs (R2-1 and M4-4) for trucks travelling downhill,
should have recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles. Descending grades shorter than 1 mile should be
avoided for posting signs because deceleration of vehicles due to braking action can generally provide sufficient control on
descending grades of less than 1 mile.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 143
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California)
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014
Part 2 – Signs
Support:
100 To establish a downhill truck speed limit, a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for
three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs. or more will be provided.
Standard:
101 Speed profiles for truck speed limits shall be prepared on the same form as other speed surveys. An analysis of
collisions involving trucks shall be prepared.
Guidance:
102 Posted speeds should be on the low side of the scale, generally within the pace of loaded commercial vehicles.
Standard:
103 If warranted, the Caltrans District Director shall issue a standard speed zone order.
Support:
104 Posting of the regulation will be by placement of a standard 36 x 45 inch Speed Limit (R2-1) sign with a TRUCK (M4-4)
plate above.
Standard:
105 A standard End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign with TRUCK (M4-4) plate shall be posted at the end of the truck zone
when appropriate.
Speed Zones in Temporary Traffic Control Areas
Support:
106 For signing and establishing speed zones in temporary traffic control areas, refer to Section 6C.01 in Part 6.
Section 2B.14 Truck Speed Limit Plaque (R2-2P)
Standard:
01 Where a special speed limit applies to trucks or other vehicles, the legend TRUCKS XX or such similar
legend shall be displayed below the legend Speed Limit XX on the same sign or on a separate R2-2P plaque
(see Figure 2B-3) below the standard legend.
02 The Truck Speed Limit (R2-2) sign shall not be used in California. The TRUCK (M4-4) plaque placed above the
Speed Limit (R2-1) sign shall be used instead.
03 The TRUCK (M4-4) plaque shall be placed above the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign to indicate the truck speed limit. It
shall also be placed above the End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign to mark the end of truck speed limits.
Support:
04 Refer to Section 2B.13 for more details.
Section 2B.15 Night Speed Limit Plaque (R2-3P)
Standard:
01 Where different speed limits are prescribed for day and night, both limits shall be posted.
Guidance:
02 A Night Speed Limit (R2-3P) plaque (see Figure 2B-3) should be reversed using a white retroreflectorized
legend and border on a black background.
Option:
03 A Night Speed Limit plaque may be combined with or installed below the standard Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
Support:
04 Refer to CVC 22355.
Section 2B.16 Minimum Speed Limit Plaque (R2-4P)
Standard:
01 A Minimum Speed Limit (R2-4P) plaque (see Figure 2B-3) shall be displayed only in combination with a
Speed Limit sign.
Option:
02 Where engineering judgment determines that slow speeds on a highway might impede the normal and
reasonable movement of traffic, the Minimum Speed Limit plaque may be installed below a Speed Limit (R2-1)
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 144
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California)
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014
Part 2 – Signs
sign to indicate the minimum legal speed. If desired, the Speed Limit sign and the Minimum Speed Limit plaque
may be combined on the R2-4a sign (see Figure 2B-3).
Support:
03 Refer to CVC 22400.
Section 2B.17 Higher Fines Signs and Plaque (R2-6P, R2-10, and R2-11)
Standard:
01 If increased fines are imposed for traffic violations within a designated zone of a roadway, a BEGIN
HIGHER DOUBLE FINES ZONE (R2-10) sign (see Figure 2B-3) or a FINES HIGHER DOUBLE (R2-6P)
plaque (see Figure 2B-3) shall be used to provide notice to road users. If used, the FINES HIGHER DOUBLE
plaque shall be mounted below an applicable regulatory or warning sign in a temporary traffic control zone,
a school zone, or other applicable designated zone.
02 If an R2-10 sign or an R2-6P plaque is posted to provide notice of increased fines for traffic violations,
an END HIGHER DOUBLE FINES ZONE (R2-11) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall be installed at the
downstream end of the zone to provide notice to road users of the termination of the increased fines zone.
Guidance:
03 If used, the BEGIN HIGHER DOUBLE FINES ZONE sign or FINES HIGHER DOUBLE plaque should be
located at the beginning of the temporary traffic control zone, school zone, or other applicable designated zone
and just beyond any interchanges, major intersections, or other major traffic generators.
Standard:
04 The Higher Double Fines signs and plaque shall have a black legend and border on a white rectangular
background. All supplemental plaques mounted below the Higher Double Fines signs and plaque shall have
a black legend and border on a white rectangular background.
Guidance:
05 Agencies should limit the use of the Higher Double Fines signs and plaque to locations where work is actually
underway, or to locations where the roadway, shoulder, or other conditions, including the presence of a school
zone and/or a reduced school speed limit zone, require a speed reduction or extra caution on the part of the road
user.
Option:
06 Alternate legends such as BEGIN (or END) DOUBLE FINES ZONE may also be used for the R2-10 and R2-
11 signs.
07 The legend FINES HIGHER on the R2-6P plaque may be replaced by FINES DOUBLE (R2-6aP), $XX FINE
(R2-6bP), or another legend appropriate to the specific regulation (see Figure 2B-3).
08 The following may be mounted below an R2-10 sign or R2-6P plaque:
A. A supplemental plaque specifying the times that the higher fines are in effect (similar to the S4-1P plaque
shown in Figure 7B-1), or
B. A supplemental plaque WHEN CHILDREN (WORKERS) ARE PRESENT, or
C. A supplemental plaque WHEN FLASHING (similar to the S4-4P plaque shown in Figure 7B-1) if used in
conjunction with a yellow flashing beacon.
Support:
09 Section 6F.12 contains information regarding other signs and plaques associated with increased fines for traffic
violations in temporary traffic control zones. Section 7B.10 contains information regarding other signs and plaques
associated with increased fines for traffic violations in designated school zones.
10 In California, as per CVC only doubling of the fines is allowed, not higher fines of other denominations. Refer to Section
6F.12 and CVC 42009 for fines for offenses committed in highway construction or maintenance area.
Standard:
11 The SPECIAL DRIVING ZONE BEGINS HERE – DOUBLE FINE ZONE (SR53(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall
be placed at the beginning of those portions of highways designated and identified as Safety Enhancement – Double
Fine Zones per CVC 42010.
12 The SPECIAL DRIVING ZONE ENDS HERE (SR55(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be placed at the end of
those portions of highways designated and identified as Safety Enhancement – Double Fine Zones per CVC 42010.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 145
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California)
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014
Part 2 – Signs
Guidance:
13 The DOUBLE FINE ZONE (SR54(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) should be placed at major intersections to those
portions of highways designated and identified as Safety Enhancement – Double Fine Zone, per CVC 42010, to advise
motorists upon entering the highway that they are in a double fine zone.
Section 2B.18 Movement Prohibition Signs (R3-1 through R3-4, R3-18, and R3-27)
Standard:
01 Except as provided in Paragraphs 11 and 13, where specific movements are prohibited, Movement
Prohibition signs shall be installed.
Guidance:
02 Movement Prohibition signs should be placed where they will be most easily seen by road users who might be
intending to make the movement.
03 If No Right Turn (R3-1) signs (see Figure 2B-4) are used, at least one should be placed either over the
roadway or at a right-hand corner of the intersection.
04 If No Left Turn (R3-2) signs (see Figure 2B-4) are used, at least one should be placed over the roadway, at the
far left-hand corner of the intersection, on a median, or in conjunction with the STOP sign or YIELD sign located
on the near right-hand corner.
05 Except as provided in Item C of Paragraph 9 for signalized locations, if NO TURNS (R3-3) signs (see Figure
2B-4) are used, two signs should be used, one at a location specified for a No Right Turn sign and one at a
location specified for a No Left Turn sign.
06 If No U-Turn (R3-4) signs (see Figure 2B-4) or combination No U-Turn/No Left Turn (R3-18) signs (see
Figure 2B-4) are used, at least one should be used at a location specified for No Left Turn signs.
Option:
07 If both left turns and U-turns are prohibited, the combination No U-Turn/No Left Turn (R3-18) sign (see
Figure 2B-4) may be used instead of separate R3-2 and R3-4 signs.
Guidance:
08 If No Straight Through (R3-27) signs (see Figure 2B-4) are used, at least one should be placed either over the
roadway or at a location where it can be seen by road users who might be intending to travel straight through the
intersection.
09 If turn prohibition signs are installed in conjunction with traffic control signals:
A. The No Right Turn sign should be installed adjacent to a signal face viewed by road users in the right-hand
lane.
B. The No Left Turn (or No U-Turn or combination No U-Turn/No Left Turn) sign should be installed adjacent
to a signal face viewed by road users in the left-hand lane.
C. A NO TURNS sign should be placed adjacent to a signal face viewed by all road users on that approach, or
two signs should be used.
Option:
10 If turn prohibition signs are installed in conjunction with traffic control signals, an additional Movement
Prohibition sign may be post-mounted to supplement the sign mounted overhead.
11 Where ONE WAY signs are used (see Section 2B.40), No Left Turn and No Right Turn signs may be omitted.
12 When the movement restriction applies during certain time periods only, the following Movement Prohibition
signing alternatives may be used and are listed in order of preference:
A. Changeable message signs, especially at signalized intersections.
B. Permanently mounted signs incorporating a supplementary legend showing the hours and days during which
the prohibition is applicable.
C. Portable signs, installed by proper authority, located off the roadway at each corner of the intersection. The
portable signs are only to be used during the time that the movement prohibition is applicable.
13 Movement Prohibition signs may be omitted at a ramp entrance to an expressway or a channelized intersection
where the design is such as to indicate clearly the one-way traffic movement on the ramp or turning lane.
Support:
13a Motorists can make a semicircular or U-turn on a green signal or green arrow except where such turn is prohibited by
signs. Refer to CVC 21451 and 21454.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
Appendix E
Excerpt of the 2015 Collision Data on California State Highways Publication
(by CalTrans)
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
2015 Collision Data
on California State
Highways (road miles,
travel, collisions,
collision rates)
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
BASE + ADT PCT PCT PCTTERRAIN DESIGNRATE FACTOR FAT INJ F+IHIGHWAY TYPEOR ADT SPEED AREA F+I ALLH330.560.000003.2 39.3 42.5DIVIDED 4 LANESFLATRURAL 962.0 415.0H340.820.000001.1 37.1 38.3DIVIDED 4 LANESROLL/MTNRURAL 505.1 200.0H351.420.000000.6 40.4 41.0DIVIDED 4 LANES<=55 SUBURBAN 345.1 148.0H361.110.000001.5 40.2 41.6DIVIDED 4 LANES>55 SUBURBAN 553.0 236.7H371.710.000000.5 44.8 45.3DIVIDED 4 LANES<45 URBAN 294.8 139.7H381.410.000000.8 41.7 42.5DIVIDED 4 LANES>=45 URBAN 361.5 159.9H390.480.000002.4 30.1 30.1DIVIDED 5 LANES OR MOREFLATRURAL 1022.3 315.9H400.480.000001.7 34.5 36.2DIVIDED 5 LANES OR MOREROLL/MTNRURAL 676.3 251.5H411.200.000000.8 45.6 46.4DIVIDED 5 LANES OR MORE<=55 SUBURBAN 365.3 175.3H421.200.000000.7 38.7 39.4DIVIDED 5 LANES OR MORE>55 SUBURBAN 377.7 155.4H431.250.000001.1 62.0 63.0DIVIDED 5 LANES OR MORE<45 URBAN 349.1 224.1H441.250.000000.6 48.4 49.0DIVIDED 5 LANES OR MORE>=45 URBAN 303.7 154.5H450.370.00700 *1.8 36.5 38.2DIV. EXPRESSWAY 4 LNS. OR MORE<=65 RURAL 671.6 263.6H460.240.00700 *2.9 34.6 37.5DIV. EXPRESSWAY 4 LNS. OR MORE>65 RURAL 992.8 379.3H470.280.01700 *0.9 36.4 37.4DIV. EXPRESSWAY 4 LNS. OR MORE<=65 SUBURBAN 453.6 176.5H480.280.01000 *1.0 38.5 39.5DIV. EXPRESSWAY 4 LNS. OR MORE>65 SUBURBAN 455.8 186.7H490.940.000000.9 48.8 49.6DIV. EXPRESSWAY 4 LNS. OR MORE<=55 URBAN 350.6 179.6H500.880.000001.0 42.1 43.1DIV. EXPRESSWAY 4 LNS. OR MORE>55 URBAN 414.6 185.0H510.430.50000 /1.5 39.5 41.0FREEWAY 4 LANES OR LESS<=15000 <=65 RURAL 577.1 243.3H520.310.55000 /4.0 41.1 45.0FREEWAY 4 LANES OR LESS<=15000 >65 RURAL 1091.5 497.5H530.320.00350 *1.1 34.2 35.3FREEWAY 4 LANES OR LESS>15000 <=65 RURAL 510.9 187.3H540.220.00350 *1.9 33.8 35.6FREEWAY 4 LANES OR LESS>15000 >65 RURAL 730.5 267.4H550.110.00500 *1.3 34.0 35.3FREEWAY 5-6 LANESRURAL 585.9 214.0H560.060.00350 *1.2 33.6 34.8FREEWAY 7 LANES OR MORERURAL 548.6 198.2H570.660.50000 /1.2 33.7 34.9FREEWAY 4 LANES OR LESS<=15000 <=65 SUBURBAN 548.5 198.8H580.490.55000 /1.4 35.4 36.8FREEWAY 4 LANES OR LESS<=15000 >65 SUBURBAN 572.1 217.2H590.340.00500 *0.6 35.9 36.5FREEWAY 4 LANES OR LESS>15000 <=65 SUBURBAN 368.2 141.3H600.340.00350 *0.9 32.8 33.7FREEWAY 4 LANES OR LESS>15000 >65 SUBURBAN 466.5 164.4H610.050.00600 *0.9 32.3 33.2FREEWAY 5-6 LANESSUBURBAN 461.7 160.7H620.160.00350 *0.5 31.7 32.2FREEWAY 7 LANES OR MORESUBURBAN 342.3 117.6H630.240.01000 *0.7 32.9 33.6FREEWAY 4 LANES OR LESSURBAN 382.5 135.9RATEACC COSTS ($1,000)GROUPBASIC AVERAGE ACCIDENT RATE TABLE FOR HIGHWAYS4/16/2018843.A.4.aPacket Pg. 97Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona
Appendix F
Three-Year Collision Data
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State Street
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey (Ramona Expressway Speed Survey (State
01/01/2015 thru 12/31/2015
Report Run On: 10/16/2018
Total Count: 466
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Riverside County
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd VILLAGE AT SAN NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920E Beat 072 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 2403 Collision Date 20150923 Time 1502 Day WED
Primary Collision Factor STOP SGN|SIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20151020
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1 DRVR 40 F H HNBD PROC ST W A 0800 CHEVR 2001 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 40 F 1 0 M G
PASS 14 -3 0 M G
PASS 1 M 4 0 M Q
PASS 11 -6 0 M G
2 DRVR 54 M W HNBD LFT TURN E F 2600 FORD 2000 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd VILLAGE AT SAN NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920E Beat 072 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 3481 Collision Date 20151013 Time 1240 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor UNKNOWN Violation 21451 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20151119
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1 DRVR 57 M W HNBD PROC ST W I 1100 FORD 2010 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 57 M 1 0 M G
2 DRVR 17 F H HNBD RGT TURN S A 0100 TOYOT 2009 -3 N -M G PASS 17 M 3 0 M G
PASS 17 F 4 0 M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)3485 Direction W Secondary Rd WARREN RD NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920A Beat 070 Type 0 CalTrans Badge N4809 Collision Date 20151228 Time 1757 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20160128
Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 RAINING Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - NO Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 85 M H HNBD SLOWING E A 0100 CHEVR 1986 -3 K -M G DRVR COMP PN 85 M 1 0 M G
PASS COMP PN 44 F 3 0 M G
2 DRVR 42 M H HNBD PROC ST E A 0700 GMC 2013 -3 N -M G PASS 34 M 3 0 M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)2798 Direction W Secondary Rd WARREN RD NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920A Beat 070 Type 0 CalTrans Badge N4809 Collision Date 20151229 Time 1815 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21804A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20160223
Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - NO Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 59 M H HNBD LFT TURN S G 2728 MACK 2009 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 29 M W HNBD PROC ST W F 2600 OTHER 2011 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 29 M 1 0 M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 57 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey
01/01/2016 thru 12/31/2016
Report Run On: 10/16/2018
Total Count: 568
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Riverside County
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)74 Direction W Secondary Rd CHASE ST NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist Beat Type 0 CalTrans Badge 2403 Collision Date 20160415 Time 1326 Day FRI
Primary Collision Factor LANE CHANGE Violation 21658A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away?N Process Date 20160614
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 21 F W HNBD CHANG LN W I 1100 FORD 2012 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 24 M B HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 NISSA 2004 -3 N -M G PASS COMP PN 24 -3 0 M G
PASS COMP PN 5 F 5 0 M Q
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)35 Direction E Secondary Rd CHASE ST NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920A Beat 070 Type 0 CalTrans Badge N4809 Collision Date 20160920 Time 1641 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20161011
Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 RAINING Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 62 M W HNBD PROC ST W A 0700 FORD 2016 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 38 M W HNBD STOPPED W A 0100 FORD 2006 -3 N -M G
3 DRVR 45 F H HNBD STOPPED W A 0700 JEEP 2004 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)481 Direction W Secondary Rd CHASE ST NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920A Beat 070 Type 0 CalTrans Badge N4508 Collision Date 20161207 Time 1522 Day WED
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20170119
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 46 M H HNBD PROC ST E D 2200 TOYOT 2000 -2 N -M G
2 DRVR 19 M W HNBD STOPPED E D 2200 DODGE 1973 -3 N -M G
3 DRVR 61 F W HNBD STOPPED -A 0100 LINCO 2002 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)255 Direction W Secondary Rd CHASE ST NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920E Beat 072 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 4440 Collision Date 20161212 Time 0109 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20170103
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - NO Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1 DRVR 20 M B HBD-NUI PROC ST E A 0100 NISSA 2011 -3 N -M G
2F DRVR 65 M H HBD-NUI CHANG LN E A 0100 CHRYS 2006 -3 N -M G PASS COMP PN 65 F 3 0 M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)420 Direction E Secondary Rd EAGLE RD NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920A Beat 070 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 2403 Collision Date 20160406 Time 1110 Day WED
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22102 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20160426
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 57 M W HNBD LFT TURN E A 0800 PLYMO 1995 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 47 F H HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 INFIN 2004 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 47 F 1 0 M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 51 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey
01/01/2016 thru 12/31/2016
Report Run On: 10/16/2018
Total Count: 568
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Riverside County
Primary Rd TIGER LN Distance (ft)74 Direction N Secondary Rd SANTA ROSA ST NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920E Beat 1328 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 5086 Collision Date 20160226 Time 1328 Day FRI
Primary Collision Factor R-O-W AUTO Violation 21804A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20160311
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 35 M W HNBD ENT TRAF S A 0100 CHEVR 2012 -3 N -M G PASS 35 F 3 0 M G
PASS 11 M 4 0 M G
PASS 15 F 6 0 M G
2 DRVR 40 F H HNBD STOPPED S D 2200 TOYOT 2016 -3 N -M G PASS 15 F 3 0 M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd TRADEWINDS LN Distance (ft)43 Direction W Secondary Rd N SAN JACINTO NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920E Beat 072 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 5010 Collision Date 20160806 Time 1433 Day SAT
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20160915
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 34 M W HNBD LFT TURN W D 2200 DODGE 2004 -3 N -M G
2 PRKD 998 -HNBD PARKED -A 0700 CHEVR 2005 --N ---
3 PRKD 998 -HNBD PARKED -A 0100 CHEVR 2002 --N ---
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd VANGUARD CT Distance (ft)351 Direction W Secondary Rd HUCKLEBERRY LN NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920C Beat 070 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 5023 Collision Date 20160917 Time 1937 Day SAT
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type HIT OBJECT Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20161026
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With FIXED OBJ Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 998 M IMP UNK IMP UNK UNS TURN S D 2200 CHEVR 2000 --A 22107 N --
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd VIA LA SIERRA LN Distance (ft)319 Direction S Secondary Rd COTTONWOOD LN NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920C Beat 070 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 3481 Collision Date 20161108 Time 1540 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor STRTNG|BCKNG Violation 22106 Collision Type OTHER Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?N Process Date 20161213
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER OBJ Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 43 F W HNBD SLOWING N A 0100 NISSA 2006 -3 N -M H DRVR SEVERE 43 F 1 0 M H
PASS 11 M 3 0 M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd VILLAGE SAN
JACINTO
Distance (ft)35 Direction N Secondary Rd RAMONA EXPWY NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920E Beat 072 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 2403 Collision Date 20161222 Time 0920 Day THU
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20170301
Weather1 RAINING Weather2 Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 28 F W HNBD RGT TURN W A 0100 NISSA 2009 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 69 M W HNBD SLOWING S D 2200 DODGE 2008 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 111 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey
01/01/2017 thru 12/31/2017
Report Run On: 10/16/2018
Total Count: 520
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Riverside County
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)35 Direction W Secondary Rd CHASE ST NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920A Beat 070 Type 0 CalTrans Badge N4809 Collision Date 20170605 Time 1617 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20170821
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 998 M H IMP UNK IMP UNK PROC ST S A 0100 INFIN 1994 -3 N ---
2 DRVR 55 F W HNBD STOPPED E A 0100 TOYOT 2006 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)33 Direction W Secondary Rd CHASE ST NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920A Beat 070 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 3481 Collision Date 20170724 Time 1436 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20170810
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 998 F H IMP UNK IMP UNK PROC ST E A 0100 MERCE 2006 --N -M B PASS 40 F 3 0 M G
PASS 6 F 5 0 P Q
2 DRVR 40 M H HNBD STOPPED E A 0700 FORD 2004 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd CHASE ST NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920A Beat 070 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 44300 Collision Date 20171101 Time 1412 Day WED
Primary Collision Factor STOP SGN|SIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20171227
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 56 M H HNBD PROC ST E D 2200 DODGE 2017 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 26 M H HNBD LFT TURN W A 0100 CHEVR 2008 -3 N -M G PASS 25 F 3 0 M G
PASS 5 F 6 0 P Q
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd EAGLE RD NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920E Beat 072 Type 0 CalTrans Badge N4809 Collision Date 20170130 Time 1608 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor STOP SGN|SIG Violation 21453A Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20170314
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 60 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 CHEVR 2008 -3 A 22350 -L G DRVR COMP PN 60 F 1 0 L G
2 DRVR 57 M H HNBD LFT TURN S A 0800 FORD 1998 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)251 Direction W Secondary Rd EAGLE RD NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920E Beat 072 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 3481 Collision Date 20170828 Time 1443 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20170922
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 28 M H HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 NISSA 2016 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 53 M W HNBD LFT TURN E D 2200 TOYOT 1998 -3 N -M G
3 DRVR 53 M W HNBD STOPPED E A 0100 TOYOT 2005 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 52 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey
01/01/2017 thru 12/31/2017
Report Run On: 10/16/2018
Total Count: 520
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Riverside County
4 DRVR 25 F W HNBD PROC ST W A 0700 CHEVR 2014 -3 N -M G
5 DRVR 31 F W HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 HONDA 2009 -3 N -L G DRVR COMP PN 31 F 1 0 L G
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)17 Direction E Secondary Rd EAGLE RD NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920E Beat 072 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 3481 Collision Date 20171215 Time 2300 Day FRI
Primary Collision Factor R-O-W PED Violation 21950A Collision Type AUTO/PED Severity FATAL #Killed 1 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20180519
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PED Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action X-WLK AT Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 61 M H HBD-NUI PROC ST W A 0100 MINI 2014 -3 N -M G PASS 54 F 3 0 M G
2 PED 49 M W IMP UNK IMP UNK N N 6000 ---A 21950 ---PED KILLED 49 M 9 3 --
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd GATEWAY AV NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920A Beat 070 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 3821 Collision Date 20170711 Time 1647 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 3 Tow Away?N Process Date 20170811
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 19 M H HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 TOYOT 2005 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 50 M H HNBD SLOWING E A 0100 CHEVR 2012 -3 N -M G DRVR COMP PN 50 M 1 0 M G
PASS COMP PN 30 F 3 0 M G
PASS COMP PN 8 F 4 0 M G
PASS 998 M 5 0 M Q
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)230 Direction S Secondary Rd LAKE PARK DR NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920I Beat 072 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 4510 Collision Date 20170103 Time 0602 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20170208
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With PKD MV Lighting DARK - NO Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 36 M H HNBD PROC ST S A 0100 TOYOT 1996 -3 N -L G
2 PRKD 998 -PARKED -A 0100 SATUR 2008 --N ---
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)8 Direction N Secondary Rd LAKE PARK DR NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920F Beat 072 Type 0 CalTrans Badge N4809 Collision Date 20170322 Time 1936 Day WED
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 2 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20170418
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 38 F W HNBD RGT TURN W A 0800 HONDA 2016 -3 N -M G PASS COMP PN 65 F 3 0 L G
2 DRVR 28 M W HNBD PROC ST W A 0100 CHEVR 2013 -3 N -L G DRVR COMP PN 28 M 1 0 L G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 53 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey
01/01/2017 thru 12/31/2017
Report Run On: 10/16/2018
Total Count: 520
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Riverside County
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)175 Direction E Secondary Rd VERNON AV NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920F Beat 072 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 4982 Collision Date 20170416 Time 0437 Day SUN
Primary Collision Factor WRONG SIDE Violation 21460A Collision Type HEAD-ON Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20170607
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - NO Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 50 M H HNBD LFT TURN W A 0700 GMC 2001 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 998 -HNBD PROC ST --0000 --3 N -L G DRVR COMP PN 26 F 1 0 L G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd VILLAGE AT SAN NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920E Beat 072 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 4850 Collision Date 20170809 Time 2031 Day WED
Primary Collision Factor STOP SGN|SIG Violation 21453A Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20170913
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 53 M W HNBD PROC ST W D 2200 NISSA 2008 -3 N -L G
2 DRVR 33 F W HNBD LFT TURN N A 0100 FORD 1999 -3 N -L G DRVR COMP PN 33 F 1 0 L G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)11 Direction E Secondary Rd VILLAGE AT SAN NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920A Beat 070 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 4300 Collision Date 20171216 Time 1322 Day SAT
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20180203
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 32 M W HNBD SLOWING W A 0100 INFIN 2004 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 46 M H HNBD SLOWING W A 0700 TOYOT 2002 -3 N -M G PASS 6 M 4 0 P Q
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)67 Direction E Secondary Rd WARREN RD NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920A Beat 070 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 3481 Collision Date 20170403 Time 0710 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20170419
Weather1 FOG Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 23 M W HNBD SLOWING W A 0100 CHEVR 2004 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 34 F H HNBD STOPPED W A 0100 NISSA 2014 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)843 Direction W Secondary Rd WARREN RD NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920A Beat 070 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 4808 Collision Date 20170529 Time 0724 Day MON
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20170629
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 30 M H HNBD FATG PROC ST E D 2200 CHEVR 2002 -3 F -M G DRVR COMP PN 32 F 9 0 --
2 DRVR 32 F H HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 HONDA 2011 -3 N -L G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 59 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey
01/01/2018 thru 10/16/2018
Report Run On: 10/16/2018
Total Count: 314
Include State Highways cases
Jurisdiction(s): Riverside County
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)345 Direction E Secondary Rd STATE ST NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920E Beat 072 Type 0 CalTrans Badge N4508 Collision Date 20180404 Time 2100 Day WED
Primary Collision Factor LANE CHANGE Violation 21658A Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20180604
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - ST Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1 DRVR 31 F W HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 VOLKS 2008 -3 N -M G
2 DRVR 68 F H HNBD PROC ST E A 0700 FORD 2017 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd STATE ST NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920E Beat 072 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 3821 Collision Date 20180501 Time 1519 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type SIDESWIPE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?N Process Date 20180801
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1 DRVR 56 M W HNBD STOPPED E D 2200 CHEVR 2017 -3 N -M G
2F DRVR 998 F O HBD-UNK RGT TURN E A 0700 KIA 2009 -3 N ---
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)0 Direction Secondary Rd STATE ST NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920E Beat 072 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 3744 Collision Date 20180603 Time 1936 Day SUN
Primary Collision Factor IMPROP TURN Violation 22107 Collision Type BROADSIDE Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20180731
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run MSDMNR Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DAYLIGHT Ped Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 998 -HBD-UNK BACKING E D 2200 DODGE 2016 -3 N ---
2 DRVR 18 M O HNBD STOPPED W A 0100 SATUR 1997 -3 N -M G
3 DRVR 27 M W HNBD STOPPED W A 0100 FORD 2008 -3 N -M G PASS 17 F 3 0 M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)5280 Direction S Secondary Rd VERNON NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920F Beat 072 Type 0 CalTrans Badge N4809 Collision Date 20180313 Time 2010 Day TUE
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity PDO #Killed 0 #Injured 0 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20180807
Weather1 CLOUDY Weather2 RAINING Rdwy Surface WET Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DARK - NO Ped Action Cntrl Dev NT PRS/FCTR Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 36 M H HNBD PROC ST E D 2200 FORD 2003 -3 N -M G PASS 14 M 3 0 M G
2 DRVR 20 M H HNBD STOPPED E A 0100 HONDA 1999 -3 A 22400 -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Primary Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (ft)172 Direction E Secondary Rd VILLAGE AT SAN NCIC 3300 State Hwy?N Route Postmile Prefix Postmile Side of Hwy
City San Jacinto County Riverside Population 4 Rpt Dist 920A Beat 070 Type 0 CalTrans Badge 4850 Collision Date 20180112 Time 1735 Day FRI
Primary Collision Factor UNSAFE SPEED Violation 22350 Collision Type REAR END Severity INJURY #Killed 0 #Injured 1 Tow Away?Y Process Date 20180220
Weather1 CLEAR Weather2 Rdwy Surface DRY Rdwy Cond1 NO UNUSL CND Rdwy Cond2 Spec Cond 0
Hit and Run Motor Vehicle Involved With OTHER MV Lighting DUSK/DAWNPed Action Cntrl Dev FNCTNG Loc Type Ramp/Int
1F DRVR 47 M B HNBD PROC ST E A 0100 KIA 2009 -3 F -M G
2 DRVR 36 F H HNBD SLOWING E A 0100 HYUND 2013 -3 N -L G DRVR COMP PN 36 F 1 0 L G
3 DRVR 46 M H HNBD STOPPED E F 2600 FORD 2016 -3 N -M G
Party Info
Party Type Age Sex Race Sobriety1 Sobriety2 Move Pre Dir SW Veh CHP Veh Make Year SP Info OAF1 Viol OAF2 Safety Equip ROLE Ext Of Inj AGE Sex Seat Pos Safety EQUIP Ejected
Victim Info
Page 37 This report is accepted subject to the Terms of Use. Due to collision records processing backlogs, SWITRS data is typically seven months behind. Data requested for dates seven months prior to the current date will be incomplete.
3.A.4.a
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Ramona Expressway, State Street to San Jacinto Avenue Updated Speed Survey
November 20, 2018
TO: City Council
REQUESTED BY: Angela Walton, City Clerk
APPROVED BY: Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of Maintenance Worker II Position
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council Authorize the City Manager to create a Maintenance
Worker II position.
DISCUSSION:
The following staff report is generic in nature to protect employee rights regarding
HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996). HIPAA is United States
legislation that provides data privacy and security provisions for safeguarding medical
information.
In March 2017, one of the City’s Maintenance Worker II (MWII) employees, labeled as
Employee A (EA), was injured in the workplace. During the time the MWII was on leave and
recovering, the City hired a temporary worker to fill the position. The temporary employee, who
filled the position as a Maintenance Worker I, eventually became a City Employee and has filled
the position admirably.
On November 6, with the advice of the City’s Workman’s Compensation Doctor, EA was
released back to work for restricted duty and limited to lifting not more than 20lbs. Since the
City was paying full medical, dental and vision for EA and his dependents for the time that EA
was on leave (roughly 17 months without working), the City determined that it could make the
accommodation for EA to return to work. EA is back to work and completing restrictive duty
assignments.
In August 2018, another of the City’s MWII employees, labeled as Employee B (EB), went out
on medical leave. EB is in the process of running out his leave balance and is on disability.
Technically, this position could be filled with a temporary employee; however, with EA
returning to work on November 6, the City must add a Maintenance Worker II position to satisfy
authorized position and audit requirements.
It is undetermined how long EA will remain working for the City, as it is also undetermined if
EB will be able to return to work after the medical leave.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Considering the timing of the above, the creation of the new Maintenance Worker II position
should not incur any significant expenses, but must be done to insure that the City’s personnel
records are up to date.
3.A.5
Packet Pg. 107
November 20, 2018
TO: City Council
REQUESTED BY: Travis Randel, Community Development Director
APPROVED BY: Robert A. Johnson, City Manager
SUBJECT: Contract Award - General Plan 2040
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Approve a Professional Services Agreement with De Novo Planning Group for
preparation of the San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update and Programmatic
Environmental Impact Report in an amount not to exceed $1,100,000 from CIP Project
#18-006.
2. Authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement in
substantially the form attached hereto, subject to review by the City Attorney.
OVERVIEW:
California State law requires each city and county to adopt a comprehensive General Plan to
guide the long-term physical development of the community. In essence, a City’s General Plan
serves as a blueprint for future growth and development. As a blueprint for the future, the plan
must contain goals, policies, and programs designed to provide decision makers with a solid
basis for decisions related to land use and development. The general plan expresses the
community’s development goals and embodies public policy relative to the distribution of future
land uses, both public and private. The California Supreme Court has described general plans as
the “charter to which [zoning] ordinance[s] must conform”, but the general plan extends far
beyond zoning and land use. The General Plan establishes a vision about how a community will
grow, reflecting community priorities, and values, while shaping the future.
While a general plan will contain the community vision for future growth, California law also
requires each plan to address the mandated elements listed in Government Code section 65302.
The mandatory elements for all jurisdictions are land use, circulation, housing, conservation,
open space, noise, and safety. Cities and counties that have identified disadvantaged
communities must also address environmental justice in their general plans, including air quality.
The City of San Jacinto General Plan identifies the community’s vision for the future and
provides a framework that will guide decisions on growth, development, and conservation of
open space and resources in a manner that is consistent with the quality of life de sired by the
city's residents and businesses.
The current San Jacinto General Plan was adopted in May 2006. In 2012, the City adopted a
comprehensive revision to the Land Use Element. In 2013, the City updated the Housing
4.1
Packet Pg. 108
Element for the 5th Housing Cycle establishing housing priorities for 2013 – 2021.
WHY UPDATE A GENERAL PLAN?:
The U.S. Census Bureau projects California’s population to reach 50 million residents by 2050.
While the largest population will continue to be in Los Angeles County and the San Francisco
Bay Area, the largest growth rates are expected to be in the Inland Empire, Sacramento Region,
and San Joaquin Valley. Additionally, California’s demographic diversity continues to increase,
making California a minority–majority state, with residents from over sixty nations, speaking
dozens of languages. Almost half of California’s residents will identify as Hispanic by 2050,
despite decreased immigration from Latin America. Increased immigration from Asia and the
Middle East will continue to diversify communities and increase the foreign born percentage of
Californians to nearly thirty percent (California Office of Planning and Research).
The overall state economy will continue to grow, but numerous factors will affect how
individuals and families benefit. Shifts in demand for labor, regional disparities, and increasing
retirement rates among older residents will create differing needs throughout the state. As all
Californians live longer, an increase in elderly and middle age residents will increase and shift
demands on infrastructure such as housing and education, and resources including transportation
and social services.
Accommodating this growth equitably while protecting the city’s environment, supporting
equitable development and a strong economy, and preserving the city’s natural and working
landscapes – all in the context of climate change – will be critical in the coming decades.
Decisions made at the local level have a real impact on, for example, statewide greenhouse gas
emissions. Local actions help determine how vulnerable the community and the state will be in
the face of a changing climate and, alternatively, how resilient they can be by addressing such
vulnerabilities. Measuring impacts and outcomes enables communities to weigh costs and
benefits of new development and to grow in a manner consistent with community values.
WHY NOW?:
Updating the General Plan presents an important and exciting opportunity for San Jacinto to
establish and update goals, policies, and implementation programs to guide the City for the next
10 to 20 years. An update of the General Plan also challenges the community to renew its "vision
for the future" and determine the goals, policies and implementation programs to achieve that
vision. The renewed vision for the future reflects desired changes to promote a sustainable
community and enhance the overall quality of life, as well as emphasize the City's strengths and
desirable attributes.
While the Great Recession officially ended in June 2009, the economic recovery in the Inland
Empire in general and San Jacinto in particular took longer than other communities. Over the
past year, the City has seen the largest growth in over 10 years including a new grocery store
(Aldi), multiple new restaurants (Starbucks, Wienerschnitzel, and Mason Jar Ranch Bistro), and
service industries (7-11, AM-PM, and Circle K). The same can be said for its residential market.
In 2017, the City approved 235 new Single-Family Residences and is on track to approve over
400 in 2018. In comparison, the City issued a total of 475 permits, or an average of 59 houses per
4.1
Packet Pg. 109
year, in the 8 years from 2009 to 2016. Combining the private development of new commercial
and residential opportunities with the soon-to-open Soboba Resort and Casino, the City of San
Jacinto is well positioned to capitalize on a renewed sense of investment within the Community.
As such, the City has a unique opportunity to re-evaluate its long-term vision while exploring
new areas of opportunity.
GENERAL PLAN 2040:
As part of the General Plan 2040 update, staff is anticipating minor changes and updates to
several elements including Noise, and Arts and Culture while more comprehensive updates are
anticipated for the Land Use, Community Services and Facilities, Public Safety, Resource
Management, Circulation and Housing Elements. In addition, staff anticipates introducing and
incorporating Cultural Landscape, Economic Development and Sustainability & Resiliency
throughout the plan.
The project includes updating the Land Use Element to reflect post-recession development
patterns and identify opportunities for further investment in the City. Additionally, it is
anticipated that the recently presented Trails Master Plan and draft Downtown Specific Plan
would be incorporated into the General Plan update. Further, the Gateway Specific Plan
designation would be integrated into the restructured land use plan for the city. The Circulation
Element and PEIR will be updated to reflect changes in State Law including SB 743 transition
from Level of Service to Vehicle Miles Traveled for impact analysis.
Further, the project will include an update to the Housing Element for the 6th Cycle. State law
requires that City update their housing elements every 8 years. The current housing element
expires in 2021. By incorporating the Housing Element into the General Plan 2040 update, the
City will be able to better identify challenges and opportunities to ensure it is compliant with
new housing laws and requirements.
In addition, staff anticipates substantial changes in the Development Code specifically related to
housing development standards and incentives as well as other land use entitlements in an effort
to streamline the review process and remove unnecessary or cumbersome barriers to
development.
Finally, the General Plan 2040 will include a comprehensive Fiscal and Economic Development
study to help guide land use policy discussions to ensure long term viability and suitable tax base
for the city for years to come.
SELECTION PROCESS:
On August 28, 2018, the City issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the General Plan 2040
Program. The RFP was posted using PlanetBids, a multi-jurisdictional web based platform. RFP
Responses were due on October 9, 2018. 93 Vendors registered for the RFP. 221 external
vendors were notified while 243 City of San Jacinto registered vendors were notified.
In addition, staff sent copies of the printed RFP and cover letter to 21 local firms (Riverside
County) inviting them to participate in the RFP and an additional 61 cover letters were mailed to
4.1
Packet Pg. 110
other firms (southern California Region).
The City received 4 responses including Civic Solutions, De Novo Planning Group, Dudek, and
Raimi + Associates and. All four firms have local knowledge and experience.
A Selection Committee was assembled and included representatives from Community
Development, Engineering, Public Works, Fire, Information Technology, Finance, and City
Clerk. Members of the committee independently reviewed the written proposals and scored the
proposals as noted in Attachment 5. The top three firms (Civic Solutions, De Novo Planning
Group, and Dudek) were invited for an interview/presentation on November 7, 2018.
The consolidated scores are listed below:
Witten Proposals
Civic
Solutions
De Novo
Planning
Group
Dudek Raimi +
Associates
Understanding the scope of services 65 74 70 69
Quality of proposal 126 138 129 120
Approach to communicating 65 75 64 65
Approach to performing this type of
service 63 71 62 64
Creativity in approach and use of
technology 149 204 151 133
Demonstrated professional skill and
credentials 64 72 71 70
Familiarity with City, County, and State
procedures 138 143 137 112
Reasonable cost 57 53 63 54
References/satisfaction of previous
clients 42 47 47 45
Related experience 62 70 69 69
Total 831 947 863 801
Ranking 3 1 2 4
Interview
Civic
Solutions
De Novo
Planning
Group
Dudek Raimi +
Associates
Dynamic Presentation 51 76 49 N/A
Quality of Examples of Similar Work 49 73 53 N/A
4.1
Packet Pg. 111
Creativity Approach 46 78 52 N/A
Demonstrated Use of Technology 46 80 55 N/A
Professional Skills and Credentials 73 79 69 N/A
Understanding the Scope of Service 65 82 67 N/A
Total 330 468 345 N/A
Ranking 3 1 2 N/A
Combined
Civic
Solutions
De Novo
Planning
Group
Dudek Raimi +
Associates
Written Proposal 831 947 863 801
Interview / Presentation 330 468 345 N/A
Total 1161 1415 1208 801
Ranking 3 1 2 4
As noted above, De Novo Planning Group scored highest in both the written proposal as well as
interview/presentation. The Selection Committee particularly noted De Novo’s the use of
technology and creative presentation as part of their justification for the high marks. The firm
included a number of sub consultants which have had recent experience within the City of San
Jacinto. Upon deliberation, the selection committee unanimously recommended that the City
Council award the contract to De Novo Planning Group.
PROJECT COSTS:
In preparing the RFP, staff identified two primary tasks and five “optional” tasks. The primary
tasks include the General Plan 2040 (Task 1) and associated PEIR (Task 2). The optional tasks
were items not required to complete the General Plan or PEIR, but would improve or enhance
the project. Staff is recommending that the Housing Element 6th Cycle, Initial Study Checklist,
and Community Character Element optional tasks be included in the Scope of Work, while the
Economic Development Incentives and Form Based Development Code be excluded at this time.
Additionally, the RFP requested that the respondents provide recommendation of other tasks that
the City should, but had not, included in the RFP. Depending on the proposal, these tasks include
video productions, financial testing of prototypes and construction health risk assessments. Staff
will work with the selected consultant to further refine these optional tasks, and budget
permitting, may include in the final scope of work.
The table below identifies the primary and optional tasks cost breakdown by consultant. Those
items with the strikeout are recommended to be removed from the project while the others would
be included in the final scope of work.
4.1
Packet Pg. 112
Project Costs
Civic
Solutions
De Novo
Planning
Group
Dudek Raimi +
Associates
General Plan 2040 $684,283 $746,343 $695,116 $727,432
General Plan 2040 EIR $269,353 $243,170 $227,439 $259,918
Subtotal $953,636 $989,513 $922,555 $987,350
Housing Element 6th Cycle $45,680 $33,500 $42,220 $54,081
Initial Study Checklist $23,500 $6,570 $6,700 $7,190
Economic Development Incentives* $7,810 $24,880 $13,090 $11,320
Form Based Development Code* $250,000 $100,000 $94,690 $140,000
Community Character Element $26,500 $5,760 $14,800 $0**
Other Tasks* $7,440 $39,620 $11,590 $0
Subtotal $360,930 $210,330 $183,090 $212,591
Adjusted Subtotal* $95,680 $45,830 $63,720 $61,271
Total $1,314,566 $1,199,843 $1,105,645 $1,199,941
Adjusted Total* $1,049,316 $1,035,343 $986,275 $1,048,621
* Adjusted Subtotal excludes Economic Development Incentives, Form Based Development
Code, and other Suggested/Recommended Tasks
** Included in General Plan 2040 Base Cost
Additional Costs
Staff anticipates additional costs of approximately $100,000 for review of the General Plan and
General Plan EIR by contract staff, not funded by the General Fund, including Engineering
(TriLakes Consultants) and City Attorney (BB&K).
CONCLUSION:
De Novo Planning Group provided a highly competitive bid package. While they were not the
lowest bidder, they received the highest marks for both the written and in -person interview and
presentation. De Novo had a clear understanding of the scope of the project and understand the
want to leverage existing and emerging technologies. They have a solid foundation and received
high accommodation from their current clients.
As part of their proposal, De Novo included an extensive list of qualified and competent
subconsultants including Economic & Planning Systems, Kittelson, Kearns and West, Duke
Cultural Resource Management, MD Acoustics, SWA Group and 336 Productions.
Therefore, the Selection Committee unanimously recommends that the City Council award the
General Plan 2040 Program contract to De Novo Planning Group.
4.1
Packet Pg. 113
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no impact to the General Fund.
The FY18/19 budget included $1,200,000 in the Capital Improvement Program fund, Project 18-
006 for a comprehensive update to the General Plan and preparation of a PEIR. The contract
award includes up to $1,100,000 to De Novo Planning Group. The current scope of the project is
proposed at $1,035,343; however, the General Plan RFP included a number of optional tasks that
may be included should the project remain under budget. Additional expenditures of up to
$150,000 are anticipated for participation and review of the General Plan and associated PEIR by
the City Engineer (Tri Lake Consultants) and City Attorney (BB&K).
To further supplement the project, the City received a $82,009 grant from the Western Riverside
Council of Governments (WRCOG) BEYOND Framework Fund Program for the General Plan
2040 Update. The grant included specific tasks and elements including Visioning and
Community Engagement, Special Studies for Supplemental Elements, and Establishing a
Certified Farmers Market. Staff will coordinate with WRCOG to integrate the tasks and funds
into the General Plan Update to the maximum extent possible.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. General Plan 2040 RFP
2. De Novo RFP Response
3. De Novo Cost Proposal
4. Cost Comparison
5. Written Proposal Scores
6. Interview Scores
7. Prospective Bidders List (PlanetBids)
8. Professional Services Agreement
4.1
Packet Pg. 114
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) FOR
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
CITY OF SAN JACINTO REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
Comprehensive General Plan Update 2040
Travis Randel, Community Development Director
595 South San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
(951) 487-7330
Staff: trandel@SanJacintoCa.gov
Program: GeneralPlan2040@SanJacintoCa.gov
Proposals Due By:
11:00 p.m.
Sunday, September 30, 2018
RFP Available online at:
http://www.ci.san-jacinto.ca.us/Bids
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Request for Proposals - San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 3
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4
PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 4
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO .................................................................................................................................................................. 5
2. ORGANIZATION..................................................................................................................................................................... 7
3. SCOPE OF SERVICES AND TERM ............................................................................................................................................. 8
4. OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES ........................................................................................................................................ 8
5. SCHEDULE ........................................................................................................................................................................... 10
6. BUDGET .............................................................................................................................................................................. 11
7. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................................................................. 11
DISQUALIFICATIONS .............................................................................................................................................................................. 14
SUBMITTAL ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 14
8. QUESTIONS ......................................................................................................................................................................... 14
9. PRE-CONTRACTUAL EXPENSES ............................................................................................................................................. 14
10. CONFIDENTIALITY ............................................................................................................................................................ 15
11. AMENDMENTS TO REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS .............................................................................................................. 15
12. NON-COMMITMENT OF CITY .......................................................................................................................................... 15
13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST ................................................................................................................................................... 15
14. PROPOSAL EVALUATION/SELECTION .............................................................................................................................. 16
EXHIBIT A – SCOPE OF SERVICES .................................................................................................................................................. 17
ASSUMPTIONS .................................................................................................................................................................................... 17
PREPARATION OF GENERAL PLAN ............................................................................................................................................................. 18
DELIVERABLES .................................................................................................................................................................................... 22
Deliverables Expected* .............................................................................................................................................................. 22
Deliverables Expected for adopted General Plan* ..................................................................................................................... 22
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM ............................................................................................................................................................ 24
Deliverables Expected: ............................................................................................................................................................... 25
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: ................................................................................................................................................................. 25
Deliverables Expected ................................................................................................................................................................ 27
ZONING CONFORMANCE ...................................................................................................................................................................... 27
Deliverables Expected ................................................................................................................................................................ 27
Deliverables Expected for adopted Zoning ................................................................................................................................. 28
CITY MEETING SCHEDULE AND COMMUNICATION ..................................................................................................................................... 28
COST PROPOSAL ................................................................................................................................................................................. 29
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Request for Proposals - San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 4
1. INTRODUCTION
The City of San Jacinto (“City”) Community Development Department requests written
responses to a Request for Proposal (RFP) for selection of a qualified planning consulting
firm (or team of consultants) to prepare a comprehensive update to the City’s Gene ral
Plan and prepare the corresponding California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
documents necessary for approval. The tasks are more particularly described in the
Exhibit A - Scope of Services.
The deadline for submitting
proposals will be midnight,
September 30, 2018 using the
online PlanetBid portal. For more
information concerning the
submission requirements, please
refer to Section 7 – Proposal
Requirements.
With the exceptions of the
adoption of the Housing Element in
2013 and General Plan Land Use
Map and Land Use Element
Update in 2012 the City’s General
Plan was last updated in 2006. The current General Plan includes six (6) elements
incorporating the seven (7) mandated elements required per State Law. In addition, the
City wishes to include optional elements as well as address recent changes in State Law,
as further described in Exhibit A.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this RFP is to reach an agreement with a Consultant who will produce for
the City a complete, timely, and accurate General Plan Update. Under the direction of
the City’s Community Development Director, the Consultant will serve as a coordina tor
and will provide the range of expertise necessary to carry out the functions of a General
Plan Update.
All services provided by the Consultant shall be performed by individuals who meet the
qualifications for the position. The successful Consultant sh all also have the resources to
provide cost effective and timely services, including providing customer service to the
City.
Figure 1 - Downtown San Jacinto ca 1950
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Request for Proposals - San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 5
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
The San Jacinto Valley was first settled by the native Cahuilla peoples, many of whose
descendants still live in the valley. The area was first seen by Europeans when Juan
Bautista de Anza explored the valley in 1774. In the early 1800s, the valley became a
cattle ranch for Mission San Luis Rey and was named for Saint Hyacinth, or San Jacinto.
At this time, Rancho San Jacinto extended from the San Jacinto mountains to present
day Corona. When the mission system was broken up in the 1840s, approximately 35,500
acres of land in the valley was granted to the Estudillo family. As families began to move
into the area, Don Jose Antonio Estudillo sold off portions of his holdings and decided to
begin a town.
Many new southern
California towns sprang up
during the 1870s and 1880s
as a result of land
companies engaged in
speculation. The City was
founded in 1870 and
incorporated in 1888,
making San Jacinto one of
the oldest incorporated
cities in Riverside County.
San Jacinto’s steady
progress and growth after
incorporation was based
on an economic base of
agriculture, lumber, and tourism. For more than 100 years the fertile valley has supported
businesses and ranches with jobs, good resources, and bumper crops such as grains
apricots, peaches, walnuts, and citrus. In the early 1900s, the local hot spri ngs and mild
climate also attracted many visitors and new residents to the area.
A plan for the community was developed in 1883 and a city government for it was
incorporated on April 20, 1888, within San Diego County. In May 1893, Riverside County
was created by the division of northern San Diego County and part of what is now San
Bernardino County, changing the county government over San Jacinto as the new
county was created.
In 1883, the San Jacinto Land Association laid out the modern city of San Jacinto at Five
Points. The railroad arrived in 1888 and the city government was incorporated that same
year.
Figure 2 – Estudio Mansion ca 1870
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Request for Proposals - San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 6
San Jacinto continued to grow and prosper
throughout the first half of the twentieth
century, and residential development began
in earnest following the end of World War II.
Although, the community at first attracted
many retirees, today residential growth in the
community is largely spurred by younger
residents who commute to work from as far as
Orange and Los Angeles counties. This
increased demand for housing in the
community is evidenced in the 62 percent
population increase between 1990 and 2000.
The City continues to offer a plethora of
amenities and opportunities for businesses,
residents, and tourists, which will spur
additional growth and development in the
years to come.
According to the SCAG 2012 RTP Growth
Forecast, by 2020 the resident population in
San Jacinto is expected to reach
approximately 50,300 and 99,100 by 2035. The
City is projected to provide over 8,000 job
opportunities in 2020 and nearly 11,000 in 2035.
Located at the base of the San Jacinto mountains and adjacent to the San Jacinto River,
the City of San Jacinto has much to offer residents and businesses alike. As one of the
county’s oldest incorporated
cities, you'll find an eclectic
combination of the old and the
new. The City is bounded on the
north by the City of Beaumont
and unincorporated Riverside
County, south by the City of
Hemet, east by the Soboba
Indian Reservation, and
unincorporated Riverside
County areas to the west.
Figure 3 - New Commercial Development
Figure 4 - New Commercial Shopping Center
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Request for Proposals - San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 7
2. ORGANIZATION
The City of San Jacinto is a general law city which operates under the laws of the State
of California and applicable ordinances adopted by the City Council. The City uses a
Council-Manager form of local government. The City Council consists of five
representatives chosen at large by the electorate. The Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem are
then elected by the Council. The City Council creates the policy for the city.
Crystal Ruiz
Mayor
Russ Utz
Mayor Pro Tem
Andrew Kotyuk
Council Member
Alonso Ledezma
Council Member
Scott Miller
Council Member
The City Manager, appointed by the Council, is the chief administrator for the City.
Robert Johnson
City Manager
Duties and responsibilities include:
• Appoints the City department directors
• Serves as an adviser to the City Council
on policy matters impacting San
Jacinto’s community and the City’s
organization
• Prepares, manages, and implements
the annual budgets for the City and City
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) in
support of City Council goals
• Enacts policies and procedures to
efficiently and effectively carry out the
City Council’s directives
• Ensures that City services are performed
to the highest standard in accordance
with council goals and policies
• Supports the information and policy
making needs of the council and
implements council decisions
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Request for Proposals - San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 8
3. SCOPE OF SERVICES AND TERM
The City has described the proposed scope of services in Exhibit A – Scope of Services
attached to this RFP which is incorporated herein by reference. The Consultant shall be
responsible for completing the specified services in accordance with the City’s Professional
Services Agreement.
The term of the agreement shall be determined upon the need of services and consistent
with the City’s policies. The initial period of the contract is for two years, subject to
agreement terms and the San Jacinto Municipal Code.
4. OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES
The City’s current General Plan and FEIR was adopted Certified in May 2006. In 2012, the
City adopted a comprehensive revision to the Land Use Element and in 2013, and
updated the Housing Element for the 5th Cycle establishing housing priorities for 2013 –
2021.
The current General Plan is a complex 430-page document which is difficult to use by the
development community general public. Therefore, the City is requesting that the
Consultant identify creative means and methods of presenting the General Plan in a
simple, easy to use format.
As part of the General Plan 2040
update, the City is anticipating
minor changes and updates to
several elements including Noise,
and Arts and Culture while m ore
comprehensive updates are
anticipated for the Land Use,
Community Services and Facilities,
Public Safety, Resource
Management, Circulation and
Housing Elements. The City would
also like to introduce and
incorporate Cultural Landscape,
Economic Development and
Sustainability throughout the plan.
Figure 5 - New Residential Development
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Request for Proposals - San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 9
State Mandated Element San Jacinto Element Last Updated
Land Use Land Use October 2012
Conservation Resource Management May 2005
Noise Noise May 2005
Environmental Justice N/A N/A
Circulation Circulation May 2005
Open Space Resource Management May 2005
Safety Public Safety May 2005
Air Quality Resource Management May 2005
Housing Housing September 2013
The City envisions updating the Land Use Element to reflect post-recession development
patterns, identify opportunities for further investment in the City, and eliminating the
Gateway Specific Plan designation. The Circulation Element and PEIR will need to reflect
changes in State Law including SB 743 transition from Level of Service to Vehicle Miles
Traveled for impact analysis.
Further, the City is seeking to update the Housing Element for the 6th Cycle as part of the
comprehensive General Plan update. As a result of these changes, the City foresees
substantial changes in the Development Code specifically related to housing
development standards and incentives as well as other land use entitlements in an effort
to streamline the review process and remove unnecessary or cumbersome barriers to
development.
Finally, the City is looking for a comprehensive Fiscal and Economic Development study
to help guide land use policy discussions to ensure long term viability and suitable tax
base for the city for years to come.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Request for Proposals - San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 10
5. SCHEDULE
RFP Schedule
Issue Request for Proposal August 28, 2018
Questions Due to City 11:00PM September 17, 2018
Answer to Questions Posted on Website Starting September 18, 2018
Proposals Due to City 11:00PM September 30, 2018
Consultant Interviews Week of October 29, 2018
Award of Contract by City Council November 20, 2018
A suggested schedule is presented below. If the consultant anticipates difficulties with the
proposed delivery schedule, he/she should so indicate, and should propose an alternate
schedule in the Project Approach in the response to the RFP.
Suggested Schedule
Visioning / Community Engagement February 2019*
Existing Conditions Report February 2019*
Planning Workshop February 2019*
Economic Development Study March 2019*
Fiscal Study March 2019*
Climate Action Study March 2019*
Identify Sustainability Components March 2019*
Submittal of First Draft to City December 2019
Adoption of Plan by City Council June 2020
* A portion of the funding for this project is through the Beyond Grant from the Western
Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG). To comply with the grant requirements, these
items must be completed no later than March 2019.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Request for Proposals - San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 11
6. BUDGET
The City has appropriated $1,200,000 for the overall venture; however, anticipates the
project to range from approximately $800,000 to $1,000,000. The supplementary funds have
also been allocated to allow for additional “Optional Tasks” that may be of interest to the
City. Under “Cost Proposal” section of the proposal, consultant should address the project’s
budgetary parameters, including cost limitation mechanisms and optional tasks. Creative
approaches that use existing resources, limit less critical technical studies, and potentially
use less expensive resources for some tasks or processes are encouraged. Consultants may
propose optional approaches or tasks that the City could consider to better or more cost
effectively achieve its goals.
7. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
The proposal shall clearly address all of the information requested herein. All proposals are
limited to no more than 100 pages. To achieve a uniform review process and obtain the
maximum degree of comparability, it is required that proposals be organized and contain
all information as specified below:
A. Cover Letter: Maximum of two pages serving as an Executive Summary which shall
include an understanding of the scope of services. The cover letter shall provide the
name, title, address, and telephone number of individuals with authority to negotiate
and contractually bind the consultant and be signed by an official authorized to bind
the consultant contractually. The cover letter constitutes a certification by the
consultant, under penalty of perjury, that the consultant complies with
nondiscrimination requirements of the State and Federal Government. An unsigned
proposal or one signed by an individual unauthorized to bind the consultant may be
rejected.
B. Introduction/Information: Introduction of the service proposal, including a
statement of understanding for the types of services contemplated. Provide a
discussion on how the objectives for the scope of services will be accomplished.
Provide the name of the firm submitting the proposal, its mailing address, telephone
number, and the name of the individual to contact if further information is required.
Any participating firms and proposed sub-consultants shall be identified and
included in the proposal (all sub-consultants must be approved by City prior to
signing the agreement with City).
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Request for Proposals - San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 12
C. The firm’s approach to delivering the scope of services: This section should also
clearly convey the consultant’s understanding of the nature of the project and the
approach taken. Summary of the proposed approach, including how the
approach will develop a vision to be integrated within all aspects of the General
Plan update. Also, provide the following:
A description of the firm’s approach to communicating effectively with City
staff and officials, other jurisdictional stakeholders, and the public, to facilitate
successful delivery of assigned tasks.
Task descriptions: a full description of the steps to be followed in carrying out
the work. This work description should be broken down into a sufficient level of
detail (i.e. task, subtasks, etc.) to show a clear understanding of the work and
the proposed approach.
Public Outreach and Engagement Strategy: describe the community
outreach and engagement strategy and provide examples of success ful
engagement to citizens who have not engaged in public discourse on
community planning efforts; minority or ethnic business and residents, and
youth; and Spanish language outreach. Highlight team experiences with
traditional outreach methods as well as the use of technology.
Ability to demonstrate creative approaches for project deliverables.
A schedule should accompany the work description showing the expected
sequence of tasks and subtasks, with important milestones noted. The City
envisions an 18 to 24-month process.
D. Assumptions: Proposals should include a list of the Consultant’s assumptions made
in preparation of the proposal on a separate page entitled, “Assumptions upon
Which This Proposal is Based.” This section should also specifically set forth those
documents, maps, and studies which the Consultant expects to be provided by the
City. Provide a list and description of support that is needed from the City including
items such as noticing, project website management, photocopying, meeting
logistics, and coordination, etc. Note that the City has limited staff resources.
E. Firm Profile: Provide a description of the firm, including a number of professional
personnel, years in business, office location(s), organizational structure (e.g.,
corporation, partnership, sole practitioner, etc.), areas of particular expertise, etc.
Location of principal office that will be responsible for the implementation of this
contract.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Request for Proposals - San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 13
F. Key Personnel: Résumé of the Lead Consultant. Provide a summary description of
the key personnel who will be involved in this project, their roles and responsibilities,
and their experience in similar past projects. The proposal must name a project
manager. In addition to this summary, full résumés should be provided. To help
maintain consistency among concurrent studies and efforts, the City reserves the
right to swap out sub-consultants.
G. References: Three references to include name, address, contact person, and
phone number of the company, length of time services and a description of the
services provided. A description of the consultant or team’s experience in recent
General Plan updates within the last three years in California.
H. Other Information: Any other information which should be considered, such as any
special services or customer service philosophy which defines your firm’s practices.
I. Insurance: The firm will be required to have professional liability insurance including
liability at a minimum of one million dollars per occurrence, worker’s compensation,
and vehicle coverage including comprehensive and collision insurance naming the
City of San Jacinto as additional insured. The proposal shall state whether such
insurances will be in force at time of contract execution.
J. Cost Proposal (including hourly rate) for services. See additional requirements in
Exhibit A – Scope of Services. Optional tasks must be clearly identified. Include a
breakdown of the following:
Estimate the number of hours that will be needed, as they relate to each job
classification, in order to complete the project. Include the work of all sub-
consultants in this Computation.
A current hourly rate schedule.
Expected budget for reimbursable expenses, if any.
A description of assumptions made while preparing the cost proposal and any
qualifications and/or supporting material for that proposal.
Suggestions that the City could make to the scope of work and/or scope of
services that would allow the project to be accomplished in a more timely
manner and/or more cost effectively.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Request for Proposals - San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 14
DISQUALIFICATIONS
From the date that this RFP is issued until a firm is selected and the selection is announced,
Proposers shall not communicate, unless set forth in this RFP, with any City staff , City
Consultants, Planning Commissioners, or City Council members other than the person
named herein for questions regarding this RFP. The City reserves the right to reject any
proposal for violation of this provision.
SUBMITTAL
All proposals must be submitted no later than 11:00PM, September 30, 2018 using the
online Bid Portal available at http://www.ci.san-jacinto.ca.us/bids. Proposals submitted
after the deadline, may, at the sole discretion of the City, be rejected as non-responsive
and returned without review. Each proposal shall be limited to one hundred (100) pages
and must be submitted in two separate parts, appropriately identified as (a) Technical
Proposal and (b) Cost Proposal.
In addition to the formal filing required through PlanetBids, six (6) bound hard copies shall
be provided to the City no later than October 2, 2018.
Proposals that are submitted online but do not provide hard copies may be rejected at
the City’s discretion for non-compliance with submittal requirements.
8. QUESTIONS
All questions shall be submitted through PlanetBids no later than September 17, 2018.
Questions and Answers will be posted on the PlanetBids website noted above starting
September 18, 2018. Clarifying questions may be submitted before September 23, 2018,
via e-mailed to GeneralPlan@SanJacintoca.gov. Questions in any other format, including
phone calls will not be answered and may be grounds for disqualification.
9. PRE-CONTRACTUAL EXPENSES
The City shall not be responsible for, under any circumstances, any claims of expenses
necessary for the proposer to receive, evaluate, complete and deliver the proposal. The
proposer should also not include any pre-contractual expenses or fees in the proposal.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Request for Proposals - San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 15
10. CONFIDENTIALITY
Prior to the proposal submittal deadline, all proposals will be designated confidential to
the extent permitted by the California Public Records Act. After proposal selection all
responses may be regarded as public record and may be subject to review by the public.
Any language purported to render confidential all or portions of the proposals will be
regarded as non-effective and will be disregarded.
11. AMENDMENTS TO REQUESTS FOR PRO POSALS
The City reserves the right to amend the RFP by addendum prior to the final proposal
submittal date. Addendums will be posted on the PlanetBids website.
12. NON -COMMITMENT OF CITY
Issuance of this RFP and receipt of proposals does not commit the City to award a
contract. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals and to waive
informalities and minor irregularities for any proposal reviewed. The City may reject any
proposal that does not conform to the instructions provided in this RFP. Additionally, the
City reserves the right to negotiate all final terms and conditions of any proposal received
before entering into a final contract.
13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The consultant shall disclose any financial, business, or other relationships with the City, its
officials and staff. The consultant shall also list current clients who may have a financial
interest in the outcome of this contract.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Request for Proposals - San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 16
14. PROPOSAL EVALUATION/SELECTION
The City intends to engage the most qualified consultant available that demonstrates a
thorough understanding of the City’s needs. City staff will use the following criteria to
evaluate the proposals:
Initial Screening
1. Understanding the scope of services Available Points = 10
2. Quality of proposal Available Points = 20
3. Approach to communicating Available Points = 10
4. Approach to performing this type of service Available Points = 10
5. Creativity in approach and use of technology Available Points = 30
6. Demonstrated professional skill and credentials Available Points = 10
7. Familiarity with City, County, and State procedures Available Points = 20
8. Reasonable cost Available Points = 10
9. References/satisfaction of previous clients Available Points = 10
10. Related experience Available Points = 10
Total Points Available For Initial Screening = 140
Interviews with the highest ranking consultants(s) will be scheduled for the week of
October 29, 2018. The interview will consist of a 45-60 minute presentation followed by a
Q&A session to answer questions relative to their presentation and their written proposal.
The Presentation will be scored as follows:
Presentation
11. Dynamic Presentation Available Points = 10
12. Quality of Examples of Similar Work Available Points = 10
13. Creativity Approach Available Points = 10
14. Demonstrated Use of Technology Available Points = 10
15. Professional Skills and Credentials Available Points = 10
16. Understanding of the Scope of Service Available Points = 10
Total Points Available For Presentation = 60
The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 17
EXHIBIT A – SCOPE OF SERVICES
The City is seeking a Consultant that has extensive experience in preparing General Plans,
a proven ability to assess a City’s current conditions, and knowledge of current State and
Federal regulations as it applies to the completion of General Plan update s and CEQA
compliance. It is anticipated that this update may result in changes to the City’s Land
Use Map, Zoning Map and Municipal Code. In addition, the Consultant must be familiar
with innovative public participation techniques to maximize public input within the
decision-making process. The Consultant should be knowledgeable and competent in
environmental analysis and CEQA compliance documents.
The update of the San Jacinto General Plan should include a separate Existing Conditions
Report, Fiscal Report, Economic Development Report, Administrative Draft General Plan,
Draft General Plan, and Final General Plan. The policy document must be technically
accurate, user-friendly, concise and written in a manner that is easily understood by the
public. There shall be an emphasis on providing information visually through the use of
diagrams, photographs, tables, and maps. Technical appendices containing well -
organized formats for ease in reference must be provided. The document text must
clearly indicate where supporting documentation or evidence for conclusions, policies
or synopsis of data is located. The relationship must be clear, concise and consistent
between the comprehensive General Plan update, technical appendices and the
Program EIR. All State required Elements are to be included, as well as the additional
Elements and components:
Infrastructure
Economic Development
Fiscal
Community Design
Climate Action Plan
Sustainability (throughout)
Cultural Landscape Study
Cannabis Cultivation
Optional Housing Element Update for
the next cycle
Circulation should address model for
LOS and relationship to VMT
Incorporate the Downtown Specific
Plan
Incorporate the Trails Master Plan
Absorb the Gateway Specific Plan into
the General Plan update.
ASSUMPTIONS
Proposals should include a list of the Consultant’s assumptions made in preparation of the
proposal on a separate page entitled, “Assumptions upon Which This Proposal is Based.”
This section should also specifically set forth those documents, maps, and studies which
the Consultant expects to be provided by the City.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 18
PREPARATION OF GENERAL PLAN
The Consultant shall be responsible for the preparation of Screen Check, Draft and Final
General Plan Update and PEIR. In addition, the consultant shall also be responsible for
the preparation of Administrative Draft(s) and required environmental documentation.
The Consultant shall be prepared to provide the City with all background files and
information used in preparation and completion of the work. All figures, maps, and
exhibits shall be of a size approved by the City and also be clearly legible.
The City wishes for a visioning component within the development of the General Plan
Update. The General Plan is several years old, and it is important that the Consultant
facilitate the development of a Vision for the overall community. Please include the
Visioning process within the Public Participation Program as well as integrating it within
the development of the Economic Development Element, Growth Management
Element, Sustainability Element, and a Fiscal Element. The Consultant is encouraged to
retain an Urban Designer/Graphic Artist who can help visualize development
opportunities throughout the process and document.
The City desires to promote a business-friendly environment, acknowledge its weaknesses
and to realize potential opportunities within the marketplace . Therefore, the City will
adopt an Economic Development Element, which will incorporate multiple features
addressing the City’s competitiveness within the marketplace; identify its challenges and
opportunities, provide strategies to improve economic vital ity of its commercial and
industrial land uses, attract new developments, retain and expand existing businesses
and completion of a market study to understand its current condition of market demand
for retail, hospitality (restaurants and hotels), industrial and housing uses.
The development of the Economic Development Element will rest heavily upon the
completion of an updated Market Study that will describe and analyze existing trade
area demographics, identify retail leakage, absorption rate, void analysis for specific
categories of retail uses, opportunity sites for development, and an inventory and
description of competing retail centers (existing and proposed) within the trade area. The
Market Study will address market demand for i) hotel operation an d ii) different
categories of retail uses that will also include consideration of potential locations for such
uses. List the cost for the market study separately within the budget.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 19
Additionally, the Fiscal Element will describe the economic foundations, characteristics,
and trends of the City of San Jacinto and to evaluate the City’s position in the regional
economy. The element should explore the relationship between economic policies,
urban development, and land use patterns, and their impact on the financial well-being
of the City. The element should describe the major components that comprise the City's
economic base. Specific components of the economic and fiscal element shall include:
Fiscal issues, the balance between revenues and services that are important to the
City’s ability to maintain and enhance the quality of the physical, social, cultural,
and economic environment enjoyed by San Jacinto residents, businesses, and
visitors.
Past conditions, including land use decisions which have contributed to the City’s
current financial position, which must be continually reevaluated for their
relevance in a growing and changing economy.
Identify future economic development opportunities and constraints, maps future
directions and sets forth goals, policies and programs intended to further expand
and strengthen the City’s growing economy.
The City does not envision full -scale land-use changes, but instead will focus on two key
corridors – the Gateway Area along the Ramona Expressway with special emphasis at
Sanderson Avenue (Hwy 79) and Warren Road; and Ramona Expressway East, extending
from State Street east to Main Street. The City is looking to the Gateway Area to provide
a range of commercial and business park opportunities, taking advantage of the
proposed Mid-County Parkway and Highway 79 Realignment. Ramona Expressway East
serves as the primary entrance to the Soboba Reservation, where their 485,000 square
foot casino expansion and 200 room Hotel is underway. This corridor is envisioned for
commercial retail and recreational opportunities to complement the casino expansion.
The consultant shall prepare Monthly Status Reports to City staff concerning the status of
the work and of completed and pending activities. The consultant shall prepare all public
notices, staff reports, resolutions, ordinances, maps, charts, and other documents
necessary as part of the planning review process.
Following initial research and public outreach efforts, the Consultant shall evaluate the
City’s existing policies and land use patterns, identify amendments to the General Plan
and Zoning Ordinance, and recommend adjustments deemed appropriate, including
new policies and land use alternatives. An Existing Conditions Report shall be prepared
to address recommendations including their feasibility, potential impacts, ramifications,
and outcomes. From this analysis, the Consultant shall develop a series of policy and land
use recommendations to be considered for incorporation into the General Plan.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 20
Elements shall conform to the most current General Plan Guidelines prepared by the
State Office of Planning and Research. Each draft Element shall contain text, diagrams,
and documentation material sufficient to demonstrate its scope and intent and shall be
internally consistent with the balance of the General Plan. Goals, objectives, and policies
shall be stated clearly and in a manner easily understood by the general public, and a
clear set of policies for each land use designation with viable implementation strategies
should be developed. Goals, objectives and policies shall be cross referenced in various
elements where appropriate. A Table of Contents shall be provided for each element
which includes a comprehensive list of tables, figures, maps, and appendices.
Textual data provided in each element should be supplemented with graphics consisting
of maps, drawings, charts, and tables. All data sources utilized to prepare the Plan text
and graphics shall be documented, referenced, and included in the Plan.
The consultant is to provide a detailed Project Schedule/Work Plan which includes a list
of required key tasks, activities, durations, and milestones to complete the General Plan
Update and CEQA documentation. Time frames should be stated in terms of the number
of calendar days required to complete the specified tasks. The schedule should identify
time periods as the total elapsed time from the start date.
The schedule should track the independent timing for each of the major work
components (e.g., General Plan Elements, Public Participation, CEQA, Technical Studies,
etc.), and the different documents to be developed, reviewed and adopted. The
schedule should include the public participation process, interviews, community
workshops, and public hearings. City staff will discuss the Work Plan with the selected
Consultant prior to execution of a contract for this project. Please note that while the
General Plan Update is a significant priority for the City, staffing resources are limited and
should be taken into account while preparing a schedule.
The Work Plan shall identify the types of data to be prepared, which shall include, but not
be limited to, base maps and an inventory/summarization of the following:
General land use patterns checked against internal records, circulation system,
and public infrastructure conditions.
Open space, recreation, schools, library, cultural, civic, historical, and park
facilities.
Housing, population, demographic and social characteristics. Explore, and
develop if necessary, new land-use designations to serve future growth
characteristics such as, but not limited to, mixed-use projects.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 21
Evaluate the Land Use Element and establish internal consistency with other
mandated elements in the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Zoning Map.
Economic conditions and factors, base market analysis, economic multiplier
effects on City economy.
Critical analysis of existing economic generators and a forecast of potential
significance in the near future (i.e., 10-20 years).
Local business conditions, including recent commercial and industrial
development trends.
Prevalent community identity, public perception, and image.
Market study community-wide concerning housing, retail, hotel, restaurants, office
parks, research and development, and industrial land uses.
Prevailing physical constraints and opportunities (transportation systems,
infrastructure conditions/capacities, etc.).
Public infrastructure conditions primarily related to additional capacity to
accommodate projected growth.
Assess the need for additional public facilities, based upon projected increases in
land use intensity, population and the correlated need for additional services.
Potential hazards presented along subterranean natural gas, liquid gas
transmission lines.
Demographic patterns and trends.
Crime statistics.
Other data deemed relevant to complete the General Plan Update.
The final work plan shall identify the types of graphics to be provided in the General Plan,
as well as the types of large-scale colored exhibits to be prepared for workshops and
public hearings (e.g., opportunities and constraints map, circulation plan, and summary
map(s) which address vacant and/or underutilized lands, open space, parks, public
facilities and infrastructure, topographic features, noise footprints, seismic, tectonic and
flood hazard areas and other appropriate illustrations of the General Plan).
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 22
DELIVERABLES
Deliverables listed below are intended to establish a baseline. The Consultant is
encouraged to identify creative methods of providing these items utilizing current best
practices and modern approaches. For instance, while the City is expecting 10 copies of
the Finals General Plan in 3-ring binder format; however, the City is also open to
alternative methods, such as book format. Suggested deviations from the deliverables
must be agreed to, in writing, by both the City and Consultant before changes are made.
DELIVERABLES EXPECTE D *
Project Schedule/ Work Plan with major work components and milestones.
Existing Conditions Report containing a summary of findings, data, assumptions,
and a draft outline of the preliminary General Plan. The Report will also contain
preliminary policy and land use recommendations and implementation measures.
Draft General Plan Elements submitted in accordance with the timeframes set forth
in the final work plan.
Large-scale exhibits for workshops and public hearings
Related computer programs/software.
Provide, update, and manage an informative dedicated website for the General
Plan Update that will be linked to the City of San Jacinto’s website.
Final Resolution/Ordinance adoption materials for the General Plan Update and
Zoning Ordinance (if needed for consistency).
Consultant shall prepare all mailings, notices and correspondences for the
distribution and review of all draft and final versions of the General Plan and PEIR.
DELIVERABLES EX PECTED FOR ADOPTED G ENERAL PLAN *
Adopted General Plan in Paper Format (three-hole binders) - 10 copies
Adopted General Plan in PDF and Word Format on CD/DVD - 10 copies
Updated Color Land Use Map (1" = 500') – 5 wall copies (30” x40”)
Updated Color Zoning Map showing areas of inconsistency (1”=500’) – 5 wall
copies
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 23
Updated Color Land Use Map in PDF and GIS format on CD/DVD - 10 copies
Updated GIS Shapefiles including all associated metadata
Ready to Publish ArcGIS Online Maps and documents.
Two (2) color sets of full size, foam-mounted maps and one (1) laminated set at an
appropriate scale per Community Development Director of the following: General
Plan, maps, and tables in format capable of being uploaded onto City website.
Note: Number of required copies is preliminary and may be adjusted as necessary.
However, indicate the cost of each item in the Budget.
Fit in a notebook that is 8 ½ x 11”. The Consultant needs to use programs that City currently
owns.
The format for all textual materials and products shall fit in an 8 ½ x 11” Binder. The format
of graphic elements may vary from said standard but shall be approved by staff prior to
inclusion in any document. Final products shall be formatted for both print and electronic
viewing in a form that is workable, amendable, and easily reproducible. The General Plan
shall be bound in a loose leaf, three-hole binder to easily accommodate amendments.
All studies, charts, graphs, and materials used in preliminary and public review processes
shall become the property of the City of San Jacinto. In addition, the Consultant shall
provide the final textual documents in a format consistent with the word processing
program and GIS program in use by the City at the time of final document delivery. All
map-based exhibits/graphics depicted within General Plan documents and maps shall
include corresponding GIS data used to produce the maps.
All software applications or computer files generated for graphics, texts or pictorials will
be supplied to the City on a disk, flash drive or other mutually agreed upon medium. The
Consultant shall be responsible for ensuring that submitted files and/or programs function
properly on the City’s computer system. For example, posting the new General Plan,
maps, and tables onto the City website.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 24
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM
The City considers public participation an integral component to the overall success of
the General Plan Update. The Public Participation Program is critical and is paramount in
the collection and understanding of the community and in particular, in the
development of the new elements. The Program should be designed to engage all
segments of the community and to permit individuals to enter and exit the process as
their time and interests allow.
The Consultant will be expected to develop as one of the first work efforts a
comprehensive community outreach and participation program that will include a
strategy to facilitate public participation throughout the entire process, from the initial
review of the existing General Plan and Zoning Code through the public hearing process
for the adoption of the new General Plan. In accordance with the time frame set forth in
the final Work Plan, the Consultant shall prepare a draft Public Participation Program for
City review and approval prior to its implementation. The Consultant will organize and
facilitate all public participation events. The Consultant may be required to provide
Spanish translation services or sufficient number of wireless headsets for translating
purposes, or American Sign Language Interpreter at all community meetings/workshops,
as needed.
The Public Participation Program should include the following elements:
Community public workshops (no less than four evening or weekend workshops).
Focus Group meetings with specific interest groups and segments of the
community (no less than four meetings during the day, night or weekend.
City Council/Planning Commission meetings/workshops (no less than four evening
or weekend meetings).
Involvement of the City's homeowner associations, residential neighborhood
associations and block watch groups in separate stakeholder meetings, as
applicable.
Involvement of business associations, school districts and public utility boards,
agencies, commissions or companies in separate stakeholder meetings.
Solicitation of comments through survey or response forms by mail and on the City’s
website (e.g. SurveyMonkey.com) and/or Consultant website containing
information concerning the General Plan Update.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 25
Prepare quarterly newsletters to be e-mailed to all registered e-mail addresses in
the City to apprise the community of the status and significant benchmarks and
activities of the work.
Use of the Internet, City website, and publications, such as newsletter articles, to
notify residents of upcoming meeting dates, previous actions and relevant issues,
as approved by the City.
Other innovative public outreach and education process subject to City review
and approval.
Please specify in your Proposal (description and cost).
DELIVERABLES EXPECTED:
Public Participation Program including types and numbers of meetings and work
products that will be generated after each meeting.
Draft abstract of all relevant information received as input from community
participation workshops.
Facilitation of, and participation in, all community meetings and public hearings.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYS IS:
The Consultant shall prepare a comprehensive Program EIR for the work contemplated
in this RFP in accordance with the latest procedural and substantive requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The intent being a Program EIR, which
projects can “tier off,” to facilitate development and promote economic development
in the City. The Program EIR shall encompass the geographic area to include current City
limits and Sphere of Influence. The Program EIR shall also address any zone changes or
development changes required as part of the General Plan.
Optional Task would be to create an Initial Study Checklist Tiering off the Certified
Program EIR. Development of some standard responses to be used for future projects.
The City desires the Program EIR to cover most projects in the City so that Mitigated
Negative Decl aration (MND) are not needed.
The timing for the preparation of the General Plan update and the EIR shall be
overlapping so that the information collection and analysis can be used for both
documents. This will ensure the preparation of both documents will be parallel, iterative,
and consistent.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 26
The Consultant shall be responsible for any and all procedural steps, including the
preparation of public notices, staff reports, Resolutions, Ordinances, Initial Study, Notice
of Preparation, Notice of Completion, Notice of Determination, Statement of Overriding
Considerations (if necessary), Facts and Findings, and Response to Comments. The
Consultant shall also be responsible for scheduling, noticing and conducting scoping
meetings. The scoping meeting shall include either meeting individually with or soliciting
comments from all responsible, affected and trustee agencies in order to identify and
discuss issues, actions, alternatives, potential and significant environmental effects, and
potential mitigation measures.
The Consultant will prepare technical support reports, appendices, including but not
limited to traffic modeling, geotechnical, biological, air quality, noise, GHG emission
reduction, and archeological reports.
The City shall review and approve all documents prior to distribution by the Consultant.
Policy and implementation programs shall be assessed for their impacts and mitigation
measures shall be identified. The Program EIR shall reference pertinent analysis of the
General Plan sufficient to allow for enactment of future development in the City.
Cumulative and growth-inducing impacts shall also be included in specific sections of
the document (CEQA Guidelines Section 15130); the Program EIR shall consider full “build -
out” of the General Plan. A technical appendix identifying all supporting documents shall
be a part of the Program EIR. The Program EIR shall also be provided in electronic version
with a search feature and GIS maps.
A Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Program shall be prepared pursuant to CEQA. This
document shall be a separately bound document from the Program EIR. The Consultant
shall develop recommended implementation measures appropriate for each element
and also identify the appropriate party responsible for implementa tion, monitoring,
capital costs, and confirmation of implementation. The implementation program should
also include an estimated time frame for completion.
Recommendations shall be developed for a mitigation monitoring system designed to
ensure accomplishment of the General Plan goals. The Mitigation Monitoring Program
(MMP) shall be provided as a portion of the Program EIR.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 27
DELIVERABLES EXPECTE D
Five hard copies and one PDF copy submitted through electronic mail for each bulleted
item:
Two Screenchecks and one Draft of necessary CEQA Document
One Screencheck and one Draft Response to Comments Document - if applicable
One Screencheck and one Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program - if applicable
One Screencheck and one Draft Statement of Findings and Fac ts - if applicable
One Screencheck and one Draft Statement of Overriding Considerations - if
applicable
Certified Final EIR
Technical Appendices
Ready to Publish ArcGIS Online Maps and documents.
Note: Number of requested copies is preliminary and may be adjusted as necessary.
ZONING CONFORMANCE
The Consultant shall be responsible for the preparation of a Zoning review and update to
the Zoning Map (if required) to ensure compliance with the General Plan Update. In
addition, the consultant shall also be responsible for the preparation of Administrative
Draft(s) and required environmental documentation.
DELIVERABLES EXPECTE D
Draft Zoning Elements submitted in accordance with the timeframes set forth in the
final work plan.
Large-scale exhibits for workshops and Public Hearings.
Provided in an electronic format available and used by the City.
Final Resolution/Ordinance adoption materials for the Zoning Ordinance.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 28
DELIVERAB LES EXPECTED FOR ADO PTED ZONING
Updated Color Zoning Map (1" = 500') – 5 wall copies (30” x40”).
Updated Color Zoning Map in PDF and GIS format on CD/DVD - 10 copies.
Note: Number of requested copies is preliminary and may be adjusted as necessary.
CITY MEETING SCHEDUL E AND COMMUNICATION
Consultant will keep City staff fully apprised of the status of the project by providing timely
meetings and other forms of communication.
Consultant will designate a Project Manager who will be the point-of-contact for
the City. This individual will attend all meetings and be responsible for th e overall
coordination of activities and completion of the General Plan Update.
Monthly communication with City staff is essential. It is anticipated that these
meetings will be comprised of the Lead Consultant, and team members if
appropriate, as well as City staff. These monthly meetings will be held in City Hall.
It is also anticipated that the use of conference calls will be necessary at various
times throughout the process. The Lead Consultant will coordinate these meetings
for the necessary participants. The number of such meetings is indeterminate and
is not to be in lieu of the monthly on-site meetings at City Hall.
A minimum of two (2) but up to four (4) Planning Commission meetings and two (2)
City Council meetings should be included in the Proposal Budget. Please note that
at the discretion of the City, a joint meeting of the City Council and Planning
Commission may be convened and shall constitute as one (1) meeting. Please list
the cost for each individual Planning Commission and City Council meeting as
separate cost items and include these meetings in the Work Plan and Budget.
Prepare informative PowerPoint presentation for City staff to reference during draft
General Plan Update meetings.
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 29
COST PROPOSAL
Although an important aspect of consideration, the financial cost estimate will not be the
sole justification for consideration. The City does expect a fair and reasonable project
cost, backed by itemization of how the costs per phase and tasks were developed.
Negotiations may or may not be conducted with the firm; therefore, the proposal
submitted should contain the firm’s most favorable terms and conditions, since selection
and award may be made without discussion with any firm. All prices should reflect “not
to exceed” amounts per item.
Proposals should include, at a minimum, the costs for the completion of each major task
in the work program. Each task should identify the Consultant team member who will be
primarily responsible for completing the task. Costs should be segregated into a time and
materials rate schedule and a not-to-exceed maximum amount for all work. Indicate
hourly rates of individuals involved, a number of hours for each component, task or
product, and the fee structure for additional work outside of the contract and optional
items. Prices shall represent the cost of finished products and cost estimates shall identify
expenditures for graphics, base maps, public meeting and hearing participation, printing,
legal notices, postage, mailing, advertising and other incidental or administrative costs.
A cost analysis for the entire project and separated by major tasks within the General
Plan Update (i.e. fee for each of the elements), Consistency Analysis, and Public
Participation.
Include separate price quotes for:
Housing Element Update for the next cycle
Economic Development Incentives
Form Based Development Code
A Community Character Element
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
4.1.a
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: 1. General Plan 2040 RFP (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
GENERAL PLAN
2040 UPDATE
Submitted October 9, 2018 by:
In Association With: Economic & Planning Systems, Kittelson, Kearns and West, Duke
Cultural Resource Management, MD Acoustics, SWA Group, and 336 Productions
Prepared for:
The City of San Jacinto
City of San Jacinto
Travis Randel, Community Development Director
595 South San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
De Novo Planning Group
A Land Use Planning, Design, and Environmental Firm
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Speaking on behalf of the entire De Novo Planning Team, we would like to thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to
comprehensively update the San Jacinto General Plan and prepare the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Based on our review
of the RFP, visits to the City, and regional experience, we are confident that we have assembled a first-class team to undertake this
exciting project and deliver the City with a world-class General Plan and EIR under a very competitively priced budget. Below we
have outlined our dedicated team members and why the De Novo team is best qualified to assist you on this important work effort.
This is a particularly opportune time for San Jacinto to embark on the important task of updating its General Plan.
Between changing demographics and economic conditions, new legislative requirements, changes anticipated
as a result of the Downtown Specific Plan, direction provided in the Trails Master Plan and Envision San Jacinto Go
Human efforts, and healthy community planning, it is a prime opportunity for San Jacinto to modernize its General
Plan and develop a roadmap for the community to follow over the next twenty years. Our team is ready and excited
to address these topics for the City of San Jacinto and through the use of new technologies and communication
strategies, work with the community to establish a vision that will guide San Jacinto over the next 20 years.
OUR TEAM
We have assembled a carefully-selected team of experienced planning and environmental practitioners to work
collaboratively with the community and the City of San Jacinto to update its General Plan. We are 100% commit-
ted to this project and will allocate our resources and energy in a way that will exceed all expectations, leaving
the City of San Jacinto with an action-oriented General Plan that addresses current and future challenges and
reflects community values.
De Novo Planning Group would serve as the prime consultant for this contract with the City. Our team is led by De
Novo Principal Planner, Amanda Tropiano who will serve as the Project Manager, and Principal, Ben Ritchie, who
will act as Principal-in-Charge. Mr. Ritchie is an officer with the firm, and is authorized to negotiate on the firm’s be-
half. Ms. Tropiano and Mr. Ritchie have managed numerous General Plan Updates, and we have developed a highly
successful approach to complex projects of this nature. We will remain personally involved in every aspect of the
project from start to finish, and we will serve as the primary authors of all reports, documents, and deliverables
prepared under this contract.
This is a big project that deserves a big team of subject-area experts. Based on our extensive General Plan experi-
ence, this approach will deliver the City with better products than one-stop-shops where staff wear multiple hats.
In order to facilitate the best public outreach, you need a dedicated public outreach expert. To address potential
noise impacts, you need a noise modeling expert with experience in your City. We have carefully assembled a
team of talented subconsultants for the San Jacinto 2040 project that have worked together regularly on other
General Plan projects. Our team includes: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. (mobility), Economic & Planning Systems
De Novo Planning Group
A Land Use Planning, Design, and Environmental Firm
DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP
180 E MAIN STREET, SUITE 108 | TUSTIN CA 92780
ATROPIANO@DENOVOPLANNING.COM | (714) 453-7711
October 9, 2018
Travis Randel, Community Development Director
City of San Jacinto
595 South San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
Subject: Proposal to Prepare the San Jacinto 2040 General Plan Update
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
2City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
(economic/fiscal), Kearns and West (public outreach), SWA Group (urban design), Duke Cultural Resources Man-
agement with JMRC and EviroPros (cultural/paleontological resources), and MD Acoustics (noise). We strongly
encourage the City to contact all of our team's references to inquire about the quality of our work, our responsive-
ness, and the success of the process. Given that the City has set an aggressive schedule to complete key project
milestones, it is important your team can hit the ground running. All of our team members are ready to start
work immediately upon the City's notice to proceed and are committed to delivering the products on-time
and on-budget.
WHY DE NOVO
The De Novo team brings to the City of San Jacinto the following unique benefits:
■ ■ ■ Benefits of a Boutique Planning Firm
De Novo is a relatively small planning firm in terms of staff size. We know this, and we embrace it. We consider our
size to be a tremendous asset to our clients since it allows us to provide superior levels of customer service at very
competitive billing rates. Larger firms tend to carry cumbersome over-head costs, which results in the need for high-
er hourly billing rates, frequent contract modifications, and higher staff turnover. As owners of the company, your
Project Managers are able to make quick decisions about how to keep the project moving forward on schedule and
on budget without any red tape. If a reasonable number of additional meetings or workshops are required, we can
add these to our work program at no additional cost to the City.
■ ■ ■ An Extension of San Jacinto City Staff
The De Novo Principals have served as contract staff members and environmental coordinators for multiple public
agencies throughout California, which gives us an intimate understanding of the intricacies and inner-workings of
public planning agencies. We understand and appreciate the burdens placed on City staff during General Plan
updates, and our goal is to make the process a pleasant and rewarding experience for City staff members. Our
work program includes the preparation of staff reports, meeting and presentation materials, and continuous project
update reports throughout the process.
■ ■ ■ Unparalleled Energy and Enthusiasm
All of De Novo’s principal-level planners greatly enjoy our line of work, and rather than spend our time managing
large and cumbersome project teams comprised of junior-level planners, we prefer to roll up our sleeves and
work on our projects ourselves. As managers of the company, we take great pride in our work products, and we
strive to build a strong connection with each of our clients. The greatest compliment that our clients pay us is to
invite us back to provide additional services. Providing superior products and client services is a matter of tremen-
dous pride for us, and we bring our high level of energy, creativity and enthusiasm to each project we undertake.
OUR STATEMENT OF COMMITMENT
San Jacinto's decision to update its General Plan represents a commitment to the future success of the City,
and it would be our privilege to work with the City of San Jacinto on this important project. We look forward
to the opportunity to meet with you in person to further discuss our proposal and our approach to the preparation
of your General Plan and EIR. The offer contained in this proposal is valid for a minimum of 90 days. If you have any
questions regarding this submittal, please do not hesitate to contact me at (714) 453-7711 or at atropiano@denovo-
planning.com.
Sincerely,
Amanda Tropiano Ben RitchiePrincipal Planner Principal
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
3City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cover Letter 01
Introduction/Information 04
Approach/Scope of Work 09
Assumptions 45
Firm Profile 46
Key Personnel 51
References 57
Appendix A: Resumes A
Appendix B: Project Examples B
The Cost File and Cost Breakdown are provided under separate cover.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
4City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
INTRODUCTION/INFORMATION
The De Novo team is committed to providing the City with an exceptional General Plan Update and EIR process that
results in a succinct roadmap guiding the City forward as it achieves its vision. We will closely coordinate with the City
and provide principal-level attention to every step of the process while adhering to the project schedule and budget.
Prime Consultant: De Novo Planning Group
Primary Office: 180 E Main Street, Suite 108, Tustin, CA 92780
Contact: Amanda Tropiano, Principal Planner, Project Manager
atropiano@denovoplanning.com | 714-453-7711
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
We understand that the City of San Jacinto is seeking a qualified team of innovative and technologically-savvy consul-
tants with demonstrated relevant General Plan Update experience to prepare a comprehensive update to the City’s
General Plan and the corresponding EIR, as well as a focused update to its Zoning Ordinance, a stand-alone Climate
Action Plan, and Cultural Landscape Study. The General Plan shall be prepared in accordance with State of California
General Plan Guidelines and with California Government Code Section 65350 et seq. The EIR shall be completed in
accordance with the Public Resources Code and applicable CEQA Guidelines. De Novo will lead and manage all as-
pects of the General Plan Update, and coordinate with staff, the public, Planning Commission, and City Council, and all
consultant team members. The successful team will be able to complete this comprehensive work effort on schedule
and will maintain strict adherence to the project budget.
Like the rest of the Inland Empire, the City of San Jacinto is experiencing changes to who lives, works, and visits the
community. Its residents are more diverse than ever; its population is getting older, but relatively affordable home
prices and new development in the Downtown (spurred by the forthcoming Downtown Specific Plan) will attract new
residents to this charming community. People who call San Jacinto home celebrate the City's history and culture and
are proud of its special place in the Inland Empire.
San Jacinto does not face tackling their opportunities and challenges alone; as one of the oldest cities in Riverside
County, San Jacinto plays an important role in the regional landscape and is connected (literally and figuratively) to
the region through shared history, cultural, and infrastructure. The City of San Jacinto must clearly understand its
own issues and opportunities, develop a General Plan that articulates the community’s vision for the future,
and implement the goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan to make that vision a reality. At the same
time, San Jacinto must continue to think strategically about its role in the region and how its decisions influence or
are impacted by its neighbors, particularly in terms of regional issues like economic development, cultural resource
recognition and preservation, air quality, climate change, and transportation.
With the support of a strong City mission, values, and policy direction, we are confident that San Jacinto will continue
to evolve in step with new market realities, economic trends, transportation improvements, and public health con-
cerns. The De Novo team would be proud to work with the City to carefully address these topics and prepare policy
documents that reflect local values and concerns while also positioning the city for long-term success.
We want the General Plan to serve as the primary tool that helps chart the path forward for the City’s continued
prosperity so all residents, workers, and visitors continue to enjoy San Jacinto's way of life. Using planning best
practices and new digital ways to gather and convey information, the General Plan will support and implement
department goals and objectives, the Operating Budget, and Capital Improvement Plan. We also recognize that
the products of this work program must be clear, concise, and focused on implementation. In addition to relying
on industry experience to tackle this project, the De Novo team looks forward to recommending innovative ap-
proaches to evaluating and presenting information to best meet the City’s needs. To this end, we have proposed
a work program that exceeds the scope and details outlined in the City’s RFP, all for a very competitively
priced budget.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
5City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
PROJECT APPROACH
Our approach to the San Jacinto General Plan Update and EIR relies on the priorities described below.
■ ■ ■ Assemble an Experienced Project Team
Located in the heart of the Inland Empire—and home to approximately 48,000 residents and 6,300 jobs—San Jacinto
is a unique community with special opportunities and challenges that are best addressed by a team with experience
working in San Jacinto and on projects in similar communities. A sample of our General Plan work is presented below.
Jurisdiction Size (sq mi) Population Jobs Jobs/Pop Ratio
San Jacinto 26.0 48,000 6,300 0.13
Lathrop General Plan and EIR 23.0 18,000 6,800 0.37
Brentwood General Plan and EIR 14.9 52,000 10,000 0.19
Menifee General Plan and EIR 46.6 90,000 10,000 0.11
Manteca General Plan and EIR 20.6 75,000 15,000 0.20
Campbell General Plan, CAP, and EIR 5.9 40,000 25,000 0.63
La Verne General Plan and EIR 8.5 33,000 10,000 0.30
Lake Forest General Plan and EIR 16.7 77,000 35,000 0.45
Westminster General Plan and EIR 10.0 92,000 20,000 0.22
Milpitas General Plan and EIR 13.6 67,000 44,000 0.66
■ ■ ■ Use Creative Strategies and Technologies to Elevate the Process
The entire De Novo project team deeply understands how the use of creative strategies and technology can improve
the public's understanding of complex planning projects and create an avenue for members of all ages and abilities
to provide the team with meaningful input. We have designed a creative and strategic public outreach program that
maximizes the use of technology to engage people more quickly and at lower costs than traditional methods. As part
of the land use planning process, we will use ArcGIS StoryMaps to share maps and illustrations and solicit feedback on
the land use alternatives. We will use online mapping software to evaluate circulation improvements and identification
of landmarks important to the community.
To help highlight our commitment to use creative strategies and technologies, we have identified work tasks
the maximize technology with a bright yellow bulb as shown to the left. Look for this symbol to see our team's
creative approaches to the City of San Jacinto's General Plan Update.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
6City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
■ ■ ■ Address Special Issues
As part of good planning practice, the De Novo team has always approached General Plan Update projects through
the lens of the community’s vision for the future and associated economic development, cultural resources, and
land use intensification issues. While independent topics, they come together during long-range policy planning
efforts to strengthen a City’s commitment to improve the quality of life for all of its residents, workers, and visitors.
De Novo and our partners on this project are also fully equipped to carefully consider the role of environmental justice,
community health and wellness, and sustainability as part of the planning framework and are able to provide solid
goals and policies and specific direction on actions the City can take to improve its quality of life.
■ ■ ■ Design and Implement an Effective Public Process
Our past experience preparing long-range policy documents has taught us that a key to a successful project is ex-
tensive and consistent community and City leadership involvement. However, the process of working with a group
of diverse interests can be challenging, it may be difficult to reach consensus on all issues, and there may be chal-
lenges associated with generating public interest and involvement in the process.
It is important for the City to work with a consultant team that keenly understands how to effectively plan and
execute a creative public process that pays special attention to engaging individuals who do not traditionally
participate and builds lasting public trust. De Novo’s project managers, Amanda Tropiano and Ben Ritchie, have
led community outreach programs for numerous General Plan Updates and are well-versed in approaches to en-
courage diverse community involvement. Additionally, Amanda holds an advanced certificate in public participa-
tion from the International Association of Public Participation, which makes her uniquely qualified to lead this effort.
The team will regularly coordinate with key stakeholders, resourc-
es and responsible agencies throughout the process to ensure their
values and priorities are thoughtfully considered.
The team will engage the community in a discussion regarding future
land uses and strategic growth areas early on in the process. The results
of this effort will set the stage for the land use alternatives report and
selection of the community's preferred land use plan.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
7City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
■ ■ ■ Use an Integrated Team
A key benefit of the De Novo team is that the project team's key personnel is composed of principal-level staff that
will personally prepare the General Plan and EIR, as well as all supporting documentation, such as the Existing
Conditions Report and the Land Use Alternatives Report. De Novo's principals and senior-staff and those of our sub-
consultants are experts in the fields of urban planning, design, environmental review, economics, mobility, cultural
resources, and noise. This approach results in consistent policy direction across all documents .
■ ■ ■ Identify Strategic Growth Areas Early On
Our work program includes kicking-off preparation of a Land Use Alternatives Report as quickly as reasonable in or-
der to meet the schedule parameters of the Beyond Grant and the City's overall timeline expectations. The Land Use
Alternatives Report will provide elected officials, City staff, key stakeholders, and the community with an excellent
resource tool to weigh the merits of potential future growth patterns and will assist the City in determining future
growth areas early in the General Plan Update process prior to the development of the Draft General Plan and the
Land Use Map. This report will identify key policy issues related to growth projections, jobs/housing projections,
circulation implications, fiscal viability and economic development implications, public services and infrastructure
constraints and needs, and environmental constraints which may influence the scope, character, and location of
future development.
■ ■ ■ Create a Balanced Fiscal Approach
Through clear policies and implementation strategies, the General Plan will carefully consider and promote San Jacin-
to’s fiscal and economic sustainability. We understand that Economic Development is a strategic priority that will drive
policy decisions and priorities for the City. Our team will craft specific policy to best-position the City for long term fiscal
security, such as crafting a land use plan with an appropriate mix of uses, strategic increases in density and intensity in
key growth areas, resiliency against changing retail trends, and positioning San Jacinto to attract and retain businesses
and jobs that reflect the City's long-term vision.
Recent budgetary pressures have put fiscal sustainability at the forefront of the City’s priorities. Possible avenues
include further encouraging development in the city by updating land use designations and providing incentives
that encourage commercial and residential development. Incentives would focus on fiscal revenue-generating uses
such as hotel and retail development, and supplement existing programs.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
8City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
■ ■ ■ Coordinate with Stakeholder, Resource, and Responsible Agencies
Given our experience in preparing General Plans and EIRs, we understand the strong need for early and on-going
coordination with stakeholders and resource agencies as well as other agencies that regulate and/or permit activities
within the City (e.g., ALUC, Caltrans, WRCOG, etc.). Our team will consult all relevant resource and regulatory agencies
as part of the project, as well as during the Notice of Preparation review and during the preparation of the Draft EIR.
Multiple consultations assure that the agencies have considered the direction of the General Plan Update and have
provided input to the analysis and mitigation measures presented in the EIR. We will also prepare draft tribal consul-
tation letters for the City to distribute in compliance with Assembly Bill 52 and Senate Bill 18 and we will manage the
schedule to ensure all consultation timeframes are adhered to and support the overall project schedule.
■ ■ ■ Create Self-Mitigating Policy Documents
De Novo integrates the environmental analysis with the development of the policy documents. This highly success-
ful approach, tested and proven by the De Novo Principals, involves identifying potential environmental impacts at
the outset of General Plan policy development in order to ensure that the documents are “self-mitigating” and that
the EIR does not result in policies and implementation programs that would change the intent of the General Plan.
During our focus group discussions, the project team will raise environmental issues related to each topic to ensure
they are considered and addressed as policies are developed. This approach maximizes the use of previously de-
veloped information, reducing the overall project budget, and provides consistency between the two documents.
■ ■ ■ Focus on Implementation
De Novo project managers have served as contract staff to agencies and have been involved with the implementa-
tion and enforcement of mitigation measures and General Plans. This experience gives us the unique perspective
and skill of being able to prepare a General Plan policy set, regulatory document, and EIR mitigation measures
that work within the regulatory processes of a jurisdiction. Our team will work with City staff to ensure that the
General Plan and EIR function effectively within the context of the City’s internal processes (e.g., development
project review) and other requirements (e.g., SCAG RTP/SCS, WRCOG CAP, WRCOG non-motorized transporta-
tion plan). This experience will also help ensure that the policies and actions contained within the General Plan are
reasonable, enforceable, and do not unduly burden project applicants or City departments.
■ ■ ■ Adhere to Schedule and Budget
Our project team is fully committed to delivering the General Plan and Final EIR to the City Council on schedule. This
includes delivering key work products by March 2019 in accordance with the City's Beyond Grant award requirements.
We thrive under deadlines, and we have a track record of meeting or exceeding our project schedules. Our use of Prin-
cipal-level staff throughout all stages of the project allows us to work quickly, efficiently, and produce preliminary draft
documents of superior quality. Our project managers take a very active and hands-on role, and we diligently manage
our team and coordinate with City staff to ensure that all parties are continuously aware of pending deadlines, out-
standing tasks, and draft work products that will require staff review.
We take tremendous pride in our ability to adhere to our project budgets. Our project managers are also owners of
the firm, and to this end, we have the authority to take any steps necessary to ensure that our projects remain on
budget. We strongly encourage the City to call every single one of our references and specifically inquire about the
extraordinary steps we take to ensure we do not modify or exceed our budgets. This regularly includes the addition
of extra meetings and hearings, the inclusion of additional General Plan Elements, and the allocation of staff time
and resources beyond the levels identified in our proposal, at no extra charge to the City. We know that this is a
unique way of doing business, but it has proven to be a tremendously successful approach for our firm.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
9
APPROACH AND SCOPE OF WORK
We have prepared the following work plan in response to the City’s Request for Pro-
posals and our experience working on other General Plan Update projects through-
out California, including projects with focused zoning code updates and stand-alone
climate action plans. Our work plan has been specifically designed to fit within the
schedule and budgetary parameters provided by the City and includes delivery of key
products in accordance with the Beyond Grant awarded to the City by WRCOG. We
have also placed a special emphasis on the use of technology and other best planning
practices to create time and financial efficiencies that result in easy to understand
documents and implementable actions.
All work products will be delivered in an electronic format to reduce waste; where
hard copies of products are provided, they are specifically identified in the associated
task deliverable and in accordance with the requirements set forth in the RFP. Spanish
and American Sign Language translation will be provided at all four community work-
shops/open houses and at two public hearings; written translation of key documents
will also be provided. Translation services are identified throughout the scope of work
and are billed as a direct cost at no mark-up to the City of San Jacinto.
Phase 1 Existing Conditions
The project will begin with the consultant team providing a high-level project over-
view and refined timeline at an in-person meeting with Staff, collecting data, ana-
lyzing existing conditions, and evaluating opportunities and issues. An accelerated
timeframe for successful completion of this Phase is critical given its relationship to
the Beyond Grant. In order to achieve our objectives for Phase 1, our experience team
will kick-off and execute a detailed existing conditions study, including preparation of
background reports and other documents which will later streamline policy develop-
ment and environmental review.
TASK 1.1 KICK-OFF MEETING AND TOUR
Within one week of project commencement, the De Novo team will meet with City
staff to kick-off the project and provide a project overview, including a schedule for
completion of the project, with clear deadlines and specific action items identified
for each task and phase. In addition to refining/confirming the timeline, we anticipate
discussing the following:
»Confirm/finalize project scope of work and schedule;
»City preferences for point of contact, method of communication, meeting and
workshop responsibilities;
»Discuss public engagement approach, including Community Workshops,
focus group topics and participants, and identification of stakeholders;
»Data request for relevant background documents (adopted documents,
reports, and studies).
In order for this effort to be as successful as possible, we recommend representatives
from all City departments participate in the kick-off meeting. Following the meeting,
the team will take a tour of the City to discuss key issues and opportunities.
1.1 Deliverables:
»Meeting agenda, data
needs list, summary
notes, tour photos,
project schedule/
work plan with major
work components and
milestones
Following the kick-off
meeting, we will map and
post the tour locations online
so the public can provide
feedback and comments.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
10
TASK 1.2 DUE DILIGENCE AND BASE MAPPING
The project team is familiar with key issues and opportunities facing the City and is
ready to hit the ground running upon project kick-off. This task is focused on collecting
any new documents not currently within the project team’s library and undertaking
due diligence to prepare the entire project team to complete the project successfully.
As part of this effort we will review the City's existing Zoning Ordinance, Specific Plans,
CMP, environmental documents, and regional plans.
As part of this task, Kittelson will also collect roadway segment and/or intersection
traffic counts and identify existing and planned bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facili-
ties. For budgeting purposes, Kittelson estimates up to 30 study intersections and 15
roadway segments, based on a review of the roadway network within the City. The list
of analysis locations will be verified in discussions with City staff prior to commencing
work on the EIR portion of the project and part of the budget estimate for the trans-
portation work includes the cost to collect this count data.
We will also prepare a parcel-level citywide base map in ArcGIS which will be used
by all team members for all graphics for the duration of the project; this will include
a high-quality aerial basemap generated from existing digital sources, suitable for
high-quality large format reproduction.
TASK 1.3 EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT
To prepare a meaningful General Plan, existing conditions must be well-understood
and clearly documented. As the first major project deliverable, the Existing Conditions
Report (ECR) will be a valuable resource for the City Council, Planning Commission,
City staff, and the De Novo team to refer to as goals and policies are developed and
the EIR is prepared. The De Novo team has found that preparing a comprehensive
Existing Conditions Report early-on in the process provides the entire team clarity on
issues facing the City, and fosters a deeper level of understanding of key topics that
must be addressed from multiple angles throughout the project. The Existing Condi-
tions Report will include the following chapters:
»Introduction
»Land Use
»Mobility
»Historic Resources (see Task 1.4)
»Cultural Landscapes (see Task 1.5)
»Market Trends (see Task 1.6)
»Community Services and Facilities
»Environmental Justice
»Conservation
»Greenhouse Gas and Climate Change
»Hazards, Safety, and Noise
While there will be a significant amount of narrative discussion included in the ECR,
we will also make extensive use of maps, graphics, and user-friendly non-technical
terms to help make it accessible to the general public. As a separate document, we
will prepare a concise Executive Summary to highlight the most important issues. This
stand-alone Summary will be prepared in a magazine format and shared via viewing
platform like Blurb or Issue to enhance the user experience.
1.2 Deliverables:
»Inventory of relevant
documents, parcel-
level base map in
ArcGIS
1.3 Deliverables:
»Administrative Draft
Existing Conditions
Report (3 copies), Final
Existing Conditions
Report (10 copies),
Administrative Draft
Executive Summary (3
copies), Final Executive
Summary (10 copies)
A parcel-level base map
will be prepared in ArcGIS
and shared using a public
platform so anyone can see
detailed baseline information.
A concise Executive
Summary will be prepared
as a stand-alone document
and shared via a viewing
platform (Blurb or Issue) to
enhance the user experience.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
11
TASK 1.4 CULTURAL/PALEONTOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT
The DUKE CRM Team will conduct a cultural resources records search through the
Eastern Information Center (EIC) located at the University of California, Riverside (UCR)
to update the 2006 study that informed the General Plan. This will involve mapping and
creating an inventory of known archaeological, Tribal, and historical cultural resources
within the City and its sphere of influence. Further we will gather information on prior
cultural resource studies within the City and its sphere of influence. Additional research
will be conducted at the historical archives and repositories, including, but not limited
to the Riverside Public Library, the San Jacinto and Hemet Libraries, the Riverside Coun-
ty Archives, and the map collection in the UCR Science Library, as appropriate.
A reconnaissance-level field survey will be conducted of the General Plan area. This
will also includes a historic resources “windshield” survey to identify historic resources
and areas that exhibit potential historic resources, sensitivity, character, and architec-
ture. An archaeologist will visit any previously recorded archaeological sites within the
General Plan area to verify the current status of the site. This scope of work assumes
that no intensive level survey will be completed and that no DPR site forms will be
prepared.
A report to document the study will be produced. The report will summarize the re-
sults of the cultural/paleontological research, additional research and the field study.
The report will include sections on the regulatory, natural, and cultural setting. The
report will identify properties or areas of potential archaeological, paleontologic, and
historical sensitivity. The report will include programmatic mitigation recommenda-
tions. The report will include relevant maps and photographs. DUKE CRM will prepare
one draft report, and upon review by CLIENT and City DUKE CRM will make revisions,
as needed.
TASK 1.5 CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT
DUKE CRM will contract with Mitch Marken, Ph.D. with EnviroPros to conduct a Cul-
tural Landscape Study (CLS) of the landscape within and immediately adjacent to
the City of San Jacinto as appropriate. The CLS will serve as a baseline document that
identifies cultural affiliations, areas of cultural sensitivity and historic connections to
the City with specific reference to the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians. The CLS will
identify places of cultural and spiritual significance, the ways in which ancestral peo-
ples used the area, areas with continued traditional use, areas that may be considered
Traditional Cultural Properties (TCPs) or traditional landscapes by the Soboba.
As learned from previous work with the Soboba, several areas, neighborhoods and
structures within the city limits retain meaning to tribal members from events and
associations in the modern era.
The study will also incorporate aspects of the landscape such as historic period ag-
riculture, industry, and livestock production, Latino influence as well as Anglo-Ameri-
can components such as historic period neighborhoods as they relate to the cultural
landscape. Tools for analysis will incorporate current guidance on the identification
and significance as well as the long-term treatment of Cultural Landscapes including:
» General Guidelines for Identifying and Evaluating Historic Landscapes,
Environmental Program, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento,
California, February 1999.
1.4 Deliverables:
»Cultural/
Paleontological
Assessment Report
(Administrative and
Final)
1.5 Deliverables:
»Cultural Landscape
Report (Administrative
and Final)
Campbell’s General Plan
IDENTIFIES THE COMMUNITY’S
VISION FOR THE FUTURE.
ENVISION CAMPBELL
In 2016, the City of Campbell embarked on an effort to
update its General Plan, a long-term policy document
which identifies the community’s vision for the fu-
ture and provides a framework to guide decisions on
growth, development, and conservation of open space
and resources in a manner consistent with the quality of
life desire by residents and businesses. The City of Camp-
bell’s General Plan Update is a multi-year process that
will include a comprehensive update of the General Plan,
which sets a vision for the future of the city, a Climate Ac-
To prepare a meaningful General Plan, ex-
isting conditions must be understood and
documented. This Community Profile sum-
marizes key development patterns, natural
resources, socioeconomic conditions, and
environmental constraints in the city that
must be considered when charting the
course for Campbell’s future.
tion Plan, which establishes goals and strategies to reduce greenhouse gases,
and an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), which investigates the possible
impacts of the General Plan Update policy changes to the surrounding phys-
ical environment.
To prepare a meaningful General Plan, existing conditions must be under-
stood and documented. This Community Profile summarizes key develop-
ment patterns, natural resources, socioeconomic conditions, and environ-
mental constraints in the city that must be considered when charting the
course for Campbell’s future. The Community Profile is a summary of infor-
mation prepared under separate cover within the project’s Existing Condi-
tions Report. This abbreviated document will be a resource for the commu-
nity to refer to during and after the General Plan Update process in order to
understand where Campbell has been and where it’s going. For more detailed
information on the topics covered in the Community Profile, we encourage
you to review the comprehensive Existing Conditions Report.
Over time, the city’s population and the physical environment in which its
residents live and work changes. In order for the General Plan to be a use-
ful document, it must be monitored and periodically revised to respond to
and reflect changing conditions and needs. As such, a general plan should be
comprehensively updated approximately every 15-20 years to reflect current
conditions and emerging trends. This effort is the first comprehensive update
to the City’s General Plan since 2001. This General Plan provides the frame-
work for long-term decision making in Campbell for the next 20 years. We
appreciate the community’s participation in this project and look forward to
a bright future for our City.
The City's new General Plan will
provide the framework for long-
term decision making in Campbell
for the next 20 years.
For more information, please visit:
https://campbell.generalplan.org/
At the project website, you can ac-
cess project newsletters and status
reports, the Existing Conditions
Report and other key deliverables,
frequently asked questions, and
updates on how to get and stay
involved.
M
Campbell Community Profile | 5 4 | Campbell Community Profile
ERC_SummaryDraft.indd 4-5 4/4/2017 3:24:00 PM
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
12
»Preservation Brief 36, Protecting Cultural Landscapes: Planning, Treatment
and Management of Historic Landscapes, Charles A. Birnbaum, ASLA, U.S.
Department of the Interior, National Park Service.
» CRM Volume 17, No. 7, 1994, Thematic Issue on Landscape Interpretation, U.S.
Department of the Interior, National Park Service.
The study will include a review of published and unpublished ethnographic informa-
tion and other input from the Soboba regarding the ethnographic history and use of
the area. Interviews with Tribal members, including elders who wish to participate and
offer information will be conducted.
Task 1.5.1 Scoping Meetings
The level of effort included herein for the CLS is considered a baseline study. Its pre-
sentation here is in an effort to scale it to the City’s anticipations. However, based on
our team’s experience with Soboba we anticipate that the level of effort expected for
a CLS will be substantially more extensive than what is proposed below. We recom-
mend up to four meetings with the Consultant Team, City, Public, and/or Tribes to
scope the level of effort for the CLS.
Task 1.5.2 Research and Interviews
Based on the results of the scoping meetings, EnviroPros will gather relevant data,
conduct historic research, inventory and review of cultural landscape components in
San Jacinto. In addition, our team will conduct Tribal interviews, field trips with Tribal
members, integrity and site analysis, determination of elements, recording existing
conditions. The CLS will include meetings with the local historical society, and muse-
um.
Task 1.5.3 Report Preparation
EnviroPros will develop the cultural landscape report. Maps will be provided by So-
boba. The report will include a discussion of the existing cultural and natural setting,
relevant cultural/historical themes, criteria for significance, significance evaluations,
and recommended mitigation measures. EnviroPros will prepare one draft report, and
upon review by Soboba, the consultant team, and City, EnviroPros will make revisions,
as needed. All work products will be reviewed by the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians
prior to release to any other party.
Task 1.5.4 Tribal/Public Presentations
The CLS will be presented to Soboba members and the public in up to three meet-
ings. Feedback will be considered and revisions will be incorporated into the report.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
13
TASK 1.6 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUND REPORT
AND MARKET STUDY
In this task, EPS will undertake an assessment of baseline economic conditions and
trends influencing economic development potential for San Jacinto. This analysis will
consider real estate market, industry, and socio-demographic trends within the City
and various competitive trade areas relevant to performance of the sectors being con-
sidered. Using this analysis, EPS will summarize the strengths, weaknesses, opportu-
nities and threats affecting the City’s economic development potential in both the
medium and long-term.
The economic development report will build heavily on a separate market study that
focuses on supply and demand conditions and trends for a variety of land uses—in-
cluding housing, retail, hospitality, and industrial—in San Jacinto. For each land use
category and associated retail sector, EPS will consider historical trends, recent market
activity and performance, and future growth pressures and opportunities to identify
core strengths, emerging niches, and under-served markets. EPS will also consider
the competitive attributes and locational advantage of particular sites, neighborhoods
and corridors, with a particular focus on the Gateway Area and along the Ramona
Expressway East.
Of course, it will also be important to be realistic about potential economic disadvan-
tages or the options for overcoming them so that General Plan policies can be cali-
brated accordingly. For example, for the retail sector, EPS will quantify retail spending
and local capture as well as regional competition and the impact of national trends
affecting consumer behavior (e.g. on-line shopping).
1.6 Deliverables:
»Economic
Development
Background Report
and Market Study
(Administrative and
Final)
EPS uses a variety of
data sources to strengthen
the analysis of existing
conditions, including big
data and proprietary
algorithms (ESRI).
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
14
Phase 2 Public Engagement and Visioning
At the heart of comprehensive planning is public engagement, whereby those who
will directly experience the benefits and potential impacts of implementation have a
role in shaping their future. Like many Inland Empire cities, community members of
the City of San Jacinto are diverse, encompassing a range of culture, language, and
economic considerations. This diversity means that there is not just one technique
that works best to engage community members. Our work program integrates
cutting edge technology and creative outreach solutions with traditional commu-
nication platforms to maximize engagement and meaningful feedback. Our team
recognizes that good community outreach meets people where they are, and pro-
vides flexibility in both timing and the avenues through which input is gathered. Cer-
tain community members may not have the desire or ability to participate in certain
aspects of the engagement process. It is our job to make the content as accessible
and relevant as possible, empowering participation from all community members,
including those who do not traditionally participate in this type of public process.
Workshops, open houses, surveys, pop-up events, and youth educational programs
provide a variety of formats, which are then hosted in-person, online, or in conjunction
with existing community activities. Content, both written and presented, is translated
into languages such as Spanish, and live translators are available at events to provide
Spanish, American Sign Language, or other language translation.
Our team has designed a public outreach program for this project that will gather
valuable feedback right from the beginning, resulting in a comprehensive Vision Plan
that meets the City’s desired timeline. We recognize that residents take pride in their
City’s culture and history, and want to build upon this. To achieve this we will employ
intensive community and stakeholder engagement during the visioning process. We
will then take this valuable feedback and translate it into a General Plan that the com-
munity is not only proud of, but has ownership over. We have a deep understanding
of the San Jacinto Community, and have staff that are fluent in Spanish as well as suc-
cessful relationships with providers of professional translation services.
We understand the demands that a General Plan Update, especially the engagement
program, place on City staff and are prepared to fully support and assist City staff through
the entire process. We will prepare a staff report for each meeting that describes the
process, key issues to be considered at the meeting, and any staff recommendations.
We will also prepare summary notes for all meetings, workshops, and public hearings.
Additionally, our team prides itself on adapting the work plan (adding an extra meeting,
conducting additional interviews, etc.) at no additional cost.
Our public engagement
work program has been
strategically designed for
San Jacinto in order to
best utilize traditional in-
person methods of outreach
as well as online digital
engagement. We will host
a dedicated project website
with integrated online
surveys and feedback
opportunities, we will also
use ESRI StoryMap to
communicate maps and
key concepts, and leverage
existing and new social
media platforms.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
15
TASK 2.1 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PLAN
For the San Jacinto General Plan Update process, Kearns & West will lead the de-
sign and implementation of the community engagement program. Our team will first
develop the Community Engagement Plan, which will serve as a guide to the com-
munity and stakeholder engagement process. This plan will outline overall objectives
for community and stakeholder engagement, lay out specific activities and timelines,
address how to best synchronize the public dialogue with the steps in the planning
process, and will identify any need for language translation. It will also identify priority
stakeholders that will be engaged through focus groups and targeted outreach, a list
which will be developed with input from the City and the consultant planning team.
The plan will provide input on additional outreach that the City should consider, in-
cluding surveys, online interactive input opportunities, social media, partnerships with
community organizations, etc.
TASK 2.2 PROJECT IDENTITY
In order to provide a consistent look and feel for all materials, and to ensure that the
GPU process activities are instantly recognizable as such, our team will work with the
City to develop a project identity. This includes a set of project logo, colors, fonts,
and layout templates that can be used for slides, presentation boards, handouts and
collateral materials, the project website, survey forms, workshop and open house sig-
nage, sign in sheets, and other uses where appropriate. During this phase, the project
team and the City will create a flexible design that can be applied to appropriate ma-
terials and products identified in the Public Engagement Plan.
TASK 2.3 COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS (3), OPEN HOUSE (1), AND
POP-UP EVENTS (2)
Our team will host a series of workshops and an open house throughout the update
process, with the three workshops occurring as part of an intensive visioning process
and the open house designed to gather feedback on the draft plans that result from
this visioning process. Interactive workshops will help us identify values and vision
from a community perspective, which is important in creating a plan that the com-
munity can own. Workshops will also provide valuable perspective on land use and
economic opportunities, and well as mobility needs. Workshop materials will be trans-
lated into Spanish.
Visioning Workshops (3)
At the outset of the General Plan process, three Visioning Workshops will be held. The
Visioning Workshops will introduce the community to the project and will focus on:
1) communicating the intent of the project to the public and inviting public input, 2)
identifying the overall vision and core values that will guide the project, and 3) identi-
fying the community priorities, land use and design preferences of City residents and
stakeholders.
Community Open House (1)
We propose that the community open house take place once the Public Hearing
Draft of the General Plan is complete. The intent of the second set of open houses is
to highlight the “big ideas” of the General Plan, answer any questions the public may
have, and take notes on the public’s feedback in order to share it with Planning Com-
mission and Council as they consider the project’s approval.
2.1 Deliverables:
»Draft and Final
Community
Engagement Plan
(10 hard copies each),
project logo/branding
design sheet
2.2 Deliverables:
»Project logo/branding
design sheet
2.3 Deliverables:
»Facilitation of three
Visioning Workshops,
one Community Open
House, and Two Pop-
up events, including all
handouts, PowerPoint
presentations,
large-format
exhibits, workshop
advertisement
As part of our visioning
program, we can use clickers
to record feedback in real
time and share the results
with participants.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
16
Pop-up Events (2)
The team will host two pop-up events during the visioning process, in conjunction
with existing community events, meant to promote attendance at the Community
Workshops. In conjunction with one of the workshops, or as part of the pop-up event,
our team will host a youth visioning charrette, which will give the youth in the com-
munity a chance to be a part of the visioning process.
TASK 2.4 FOCUS GROUP MEETINGS (4)
Focus groups will allow the project team and the City to engage in more specific dis-
cussions than could occur at public workshops and open houses. Our team will plan
and facilitate four focus group meetings that synchronize with the various steps in the
planning process. We will work with the City to identify focus group participants from
sectors that could include:
» Development (brokers, realtors, developers, etc.)
» Community health and wellness (health care providers, advocacy groups, need
to find local voices that would want to participate)
» Cultural landscapes (history, tribes, etc.)
» Housing (we’re updating the Housing Element, so I’m guessing this could
include affordable housing developers, housing advocates, etc.)
Focus groups will be conducted during the visioning phase. To provide time and cost
efficiencies, we propose to host all four meetings on one intensive day.
TASK 2.5 STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS AND INTERVIEWS (8)
Stakeholder meetings and interviews provide and a way to directly engage stakehold-
ers who may not participate in public outreach or focus groups but may have import-
ant input to guide the process. This could include Home Owners Associations, com-
munity and neighborhood groups, business associations, school districts and utilities,
agencies, commissions, and companies. These meetings might occur on an individual
basis, or with a small group of 2-3 stakeholders. Total of up to 8. These meetings will
be far more focused than Focus Group meetings, with the purpose of gaining valuable
insight from these stakeholders and encouraging them to comment on plan drafts or
engage directly with the City and Planning team on issues important to them.
TASK 2.6 ONLINE SURVEY TOOL
Kearns and West proposes using an online survey tool to share information on the
project and gather input on the General Plan from the community. Our outreach team
has found SurveyMonkey to be a cost-efficient yet engaging tool to gather meaningful
feedback, above many other online tools. Surveys will be conducted in both English
and Spanish, and will based on the programs and activities defined in the Public En-
gagement Plan. The project team will design two surveys, one during the visioning
stage and the other during the alternatives stage.
Our team is also well-versed and able to solicit feedback using ESRI StoryMaps, which
allows the team to post maps and content to an interactive mapping software for
users to review and leave comments on. We have used this approach successfully in
the City of Brentwood and it has been a valuable tool to communicate detailed visual
content. As described in Phase 3, we propose sharing the results of the Alternatives
Report via ESRI StoryMaps and can integrate online survey tools into this platform.
2.4 Deliverables:
»Preparation and
facilitation of four
focus group meetings
2.5 Deliverables:
»Consultation with the
City Council (via one-
on-one meetings or
a study session) and
stakeholder interviews
as needed throughout
the process (up to 15)
2.6 Deliverables:
»Surveys as-needed
throughout the
project
Different people want
to provide feedback in
difference ways. We will
use online and in-person
formats to solicit critical
information.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
17
TASK 2.7 DIGITAL ENGAGEMENT
Kearns & West staff will lead the development and maintenance of the project web-
site, as well as a project email and phone number. The website will serve as a central
location for project updates and information, links to surveys, as well as an avenue to
advertise upcoming workshops and open houses. The website will be interactive and
easy to use, and will be updated regularly. The email address and phone number will
provide a direct link for the community to email the project team, leave a voicemail,
or even send a text message, ensuring that all input is funneled through a central
location.
The project team will also work with the City to develop content for posting on the
City’s social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Nextdoor, etc.). This could include
workshop and survey announcements, simple visuals, or other customized content.
TASK 2.8 ELECTRONIC MEDIA
Any modern robust engagement program must include an online presence, as de-
scribed in this task, in addition to in-person community meetings and events. For this
project, the De Novo team has proposed developing online community surveys (Task
2.6), a dedicated project website (Task 2.7), digital newsletters to proactively educate
and engage the community throughout the process, and other forms of electronic
media.
Integration with Existing City of San Jacinto Online Profiles
De Novo will work with the City to develop text and graphics for the City to post on ex-
isting social media platforms to create a bridge between those users and the General
Plan website. We understand that the City of San Jacinto and the Police Department
maintain Facebook pages, which can be geo-targeted to advertise meetings and other
points of engagement. There are also active Nextdoor neighborhoods in San Jacinto,
and the City can post messages to these users through an official City-sponsored ac-
count which has proved to be very successful in other communities.
Quarterly Electronic Newsletters/Project Updates
The De Novo team will prepare newsletters that identify the status of the process, pro-
vide information regarding upcoming meetings, describe key issues that have been
resolved and/or are being raised for discussion, and provide information on how to
participate in the process. Each newsletter will be posted on the project website and
will also be provided to the City in a format suitable for high-quality reproduction.
Other Support Graphics
Throughout the project our team will generally be ready to assist with development of
other support graphics, including advertisements for recreational programs, Chamber
of Commerce events, utility bill inserts, etc.
TASK 2.9 VISION PLAN DOCUMENT
The public engagement and visioning process described above will result in a com-
prehensive Vision Plan document which will serve as the foundation for the goals,
policies, and actions identified in the General Plan. In the Vision Plan, the team will
summarize the public engagement program, input received, and outreach outcomes.
It will also identify the community’s goals and vision for the future as well as specific
issue areas that must be carefully addressed in the General Plan and/or Environmental
2.7 Deliverables:
»Project website
development and
management
2.8 Deliverables:
»Advertisements for
existing social media
accounts, quarterly
electronic newsletters,
other advertisements
2.9 Deliverables:
»Administrative Draft
Vision Plan Document
(5 copies), Final Vision
Plan Document (15
copies); English and
Spanish Versions
As technology and
methods of communication
change, the use of digital
engagement techniques
becomes more important.
We will develop online
newsletters, online
announcements, and other
supportive graphics to
connect with people in new
and exciting ways.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
18
Impact Report. The Vision Plan will put greater emphasis on articulating the com-
munity's balance of quality-of-life, economic development, and fiscal sustainability.
During the initial stage of the process, the team will define clear goals and objectives
and guiding principles, to articulate the city’s future development potential. The Plan
will look into strategies related to renovation of existing facilities; land use, density,
physical form and character, public spaces, mobility, relationship to natural features,
and connectivity to the surrounding areas.
The document will be stylized using the project identity established during the vision-
ing phase, and will be a visually appealing document designed for ease of reading
and understanding by the community. It will be in full color and will include pictures
of activities conducted.
PHASE 3 LAND USE ALTERNATIVES
In this task, the De Novo team will prepare a Land Use Alternatives Report that evalu-
ates three land use alternatives and, based on the evaluation of and feedback received
on these alternatives, develop a preferred land use plan.
TASK 3.1 LAND USE ALTERNATIVES REPORT
This report will provide a summary of community input related to land use changes
and three land use map alternatives. Each alternative will be analyzed to determine
potential growth effects and the alternative’s consistency with the community’s vision,
as depicted in the graphics and text below. This document will serve as the primary
tool to aid the City in determining the appropriate future strategic growth areas for
the General Plan Update.
Land Use
An overview and compari-
son of each land use alter-
native will be provided that
demonstrates key differences
between each alternative in
respect to residential, com-
mercial/industrial, open space,
parks, community facilities,
and other land uses. Potential
land use conflicts, including
residential/industrial interfac-
es, will be identified.
Circulation
We will use the travel mod-
el to identify program-level
mobility impacts of the land
use alternatives. Impacts will
be identified by comparing
the analysis results to the cur-
rent significance criteria. For
significant impacts, we will
propose mitigation measures
to improve the level of service
and/or reduce vehicle miles
traveled.
Economic & Fiscal
The land use alternatives will
be evaluated for various eco-
nomic and fiscal impacts (e.g.,
job creation and municipal
budget impacts) to under-
stand the economic develop-
ment and local government
consequences from the rec-
ommendations embodied in
Land Use Alternatives.
Safety & Environment
The alternatives will be com-
paratively evaluated for po-
tential adverse effects as-
sociated with safety issues
(flooding, unstable soils, haz-
ardous materials, etc.) and
environmental constraints
(aesthetics, mineral/energy
resources, stormwater runoff
and water quality, noise, air
quality, greenhouse gas emis-
sions).
3.1 Deliverables:
»Land Use Alternatives
Report First and
Second Drafts and
Final Report (10 hard
copies each)
Community Vision
October 2018
www.lakeforest.generalplan.org
Our Land Use Alternatives
Report will be prepared in
hard-copy and also using
ESRI StoryMaps, an easy
online tool to communicate
maps and statistical details.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
19
TASK 3.2 PREFERRED LAND USE PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND
ANALYSIS
The team will present the Land Use Alternatives Report to the public, Planning Com-
mission, and City Council for consideration and feedback. Based on the information
and direction received, the team will prepare a preferred land use plan and conduct
the necessary analysis to develop a detailed project description for use in the EIR.
The De Novo team expects the Preferred Plan to reflect components of more than
one alternative; in other words, it is not likely that an alternative will be “perfect” and
selected as the Preferred Plan. Once a Preferred Land Use Plan has been defined, final
demographic information will be generated and EPS will update the fiscal model
developed in Task 3.1 to project the Plan’s net fiscal impacts. EPS will also prepare a
supplemental fiscal analysis memorandum to articulate the results of the analysis for
the Preferred Land Use Plan and, if necessary, recommend fiscal mitigation measures
to ensure the fiscal sustainability of the adopted General Plan, which can be incorpo-
rated into the Fiscal Sustainability Element of the General Plan.
TASK 3.3 FISCAL ANALYSIS REPORT
The ability of the City to provide high quality public services such as public safety, com-
munity facilities (e.g. parks, recreation, library), and basic government functions (e.g.
code enforcement, planning, administration) is dependent on collecting adequate
revenues. In this task, EPS will evaluate the City’s historic, current, and projected fiscal
and economic conditions, and identify strengths and weaknesses that will impact the
City’s fiscal sustainability into the future. The report will be based on a review of the
City’s current and historical budgets and key revenue and cost drivers. The primary
goal will be to ascertain the relative fiscal contribution of various land uses and how
they may be affected by the scale, location, and type of development. For example,
the analysis will identify the relative net fiscal impacts of residential and commercial
development as a basis for calibrating future growth that optimizes fiscal outcomes.
3.2 Deliverables:
»Preferred Land Use
Plan and associated
buildout summary
information, fiscal
analysis on the
Preferred Plan
3.3 Deliverables:
»Fiscal Analysis
Report
(Administrative
Draft and Final)
The preferred land use map
will be shared online via
StoryMaps and integrated
into the website so users can
click and review parcel-
specific policy guidance.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
20
PHASE 4 GENERAL PLAN
The De Novo team is committed to providing the City a General Plan of the highest
quality and will actively engage the community to develop a vision for the General
Plan, prepare a policy document that reflects the desires of the City, and create im-
plementation actions that are consistent with the City’s vision for the future. De Novo’s
team of principal-level staff are experts in preparing General Plans and will ensure
that this update complies with all legislative requirements and addresses planning
best practices. Please note that the Housing Element Update process is addressed
separately as an optional task, as requested in the RFP.
TASK 4.1 GENERAL PLAN OUTLINE AND FORMAT
De Novo realizes that the General Plan document must be organized in the manner
most useful to the City. We understand that in additional to updating all required ele-
ments, this update will also address the following optional topics as either stand-alone
elements or in conjunction with a required element: Economic Development, Com-
munity Health and Wellness, and Environmental Justice. This proposal recommends
that a separate Implementation Plan be adopted concurrent with, but separate from,
the General Plan document. This approach extracts the actions from the body of the
General Plan, which further streamlines the policy direction. All implementation ac-
tions can be consolidated into a separate document which is not subject to general
plan amendment requirements and can more easily be used as a working tool for
City staff and elected and appointed decision-makers. However, should the City wish
to include the implementation actions in the body of the General Plan elements, that
can easily be accommodated at no additional cost.
TASK 4.2 ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
The De Novo Team will provide City staff with an Administrative Draft General Plan for
review; comments on the Administrative Draft General Plan Update will be used to cre-
ate a Public Hearing Draft General Plan. We anticipate meeting with City staff to review
comments and reach agreement on how to address potentially conflicting comments.
The current General Plan will be thoroughly reviewed to determine components that
should be carried forward and to identify areas where new goals and policies are
needed to address the community’s desires as well as changes to state law since the
previous update. In preparing the General Plan Update, the De Novo team will prepare
each element to ensure that all goals, policies, and actions:
»Support the community’s vision and values;
»Address requirements of state law;
»Avoid or mitigate potential environmental impacts, or are balanced by social,
economic, legal, or other relevant considerations;
»Are grounded in recent and sound community planning and conservation
trends; and
»Are internally consistent.
While the final content and format will be finalized during Task 4.1 (see above), we
have outlined the high-level topics we expect will be included based on our under-
standing of the project and special issues facing the City of San Jacinto. These topics
are described briefly below.
4.2 Deliverables:
»Administrative Draft
General Plan (5 hard
copies, 5 CDs with
Word and PDF files)
4.1 Deliverables:
»Administrative Draft
GP Outline, Final GP
Outline, Element
Template
The new San Jacinto
General Plan must be
prepared to meet the needs
of its various users; while
some people prefer hard
copies, it is also possible
to host the General Plan
on an online platform to
complement the traditional
format. We will work with
the City to find the right
format for its needs and
users.
The General Plan will
look forward to anticipate
changing technologies and
digital trends over the next
twenty years, and build in
the flexibility the City needs
in order to address these
changes over time.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
21
Introduction
The introduction will identify the General Plan vision statement, discuss the rich cul-
tural and historical heritage of San Jacinto, describe the organization of the General
Plan, and describe how the General Plan complies with applicable regulations.
Land Use
The Land Use Element will be updated to reflect post-recession development pat-
terns, including the new Downtown Specific Plan, identify opportunities for other in-
vestment in the City, and absorb the Gateway Specific Plan into the General Plan
Update. We will provide descriptions of land use designations and policy guidance
to address the relationship between building facades and the public realm, the form
and mass of buildings in relation to one another, and the scale and types of streets
and blocks. The Land Use Element will capitalize on the community’s assets and po-
tential with "placemaking" ideas that ultimately create good public spaces that pro-
mote people’s health, happiness, and well-being. It will provide goals and policies that
cover the following topics:
»Land use types, mix, balance, and location
»Strategic growth areas/areas of change (resolve issues related to Gateway
Specific Plan designation, which was not prepared)
»Major destinations in the City
»Specific recommendations for revisions to adopted planning documents to
ensure on-going consistency and implementation of the General Plan
»Neighborhood enhancement
Resource Management Element (Conservation and Open Space)
The Resource Management Element will focus on the cultural, natural, environmental,
and man-made resources and the provision of open spaces. The Element combines
the state-mandated Open Space and Conservation Elements and provides the foun-
dation for resource conservation in the context of the City’s long-term vision for the
future and Land Use Map. The Resources Management Element will be developed to
be consistent with other General Plan Elements (e.g., Land Use, Circulation), and its
policies, programs, and implementation actions will address the following topics:
»Air quality/greenhouse gases
»Cultural resources, including the important City's historic places and structures,
»Biological resources,
»Energy and mineral resources,
»Parks and recreation programs,
»Open space,
»Recreational trails,
»Scenic vistas
Environmental Justice Element
While General Plans have only recently been required to address the topic of Environmental
Justice (EJ) in response to SB 1000, the De Novo team is proud to have long-considered the
needs of a community's most vulnerable population as fundamental to our past General
Plan work. There are a number of ways to articulate what "environmental justice" means in
relation to the practice of planning, but for our purposes we find the definition developed
by CalEPA to be especially helpful, where environmental justice means "the fair treatment
of people of all races, cultures, and incomes with respect to the development, adoption,
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
22
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies". With
that said, as San Jacinto updates its General Plan, it will need to define what EJ means for
this community.
SB 1000 requires jurisdictions to first identify environmentally disadvantaged commu-
nities (according to CalEnviroScreen, a significant portion of San Jacinto is considered
a disadvantaged community, or DAC), and then to address a minimum of seven EJ-re-
lated issues:
»Pollution exposure (including air quality)
»Food access
»Public facilities
»Safe and sanitary homes
»Physical activity
»Community engagement
»Prioritization of improvements and programs addressing the needs of DACs
Given the newness of how EJ is addressed in General Plans, there are limited exam-
ples (Jurupa Valley, National City) of how San Jacinto can approach this issue. The
California Environmental Justice Alliance recently released an SB 1000 Implementa-
tion Toolkit which provides background on EJ issues and direction on how EJ can be
addressed in General Plans. This toolkit, which is available for review and reference
to all jurisdictions and professionals free of charge, provides a good starting point for
discussion but ultimately how EJ is addressed in San Jacinto will need to be tailored
to the issues and opportunities specifically facing this community.
At a minimum, we recognize that the San Jacinto General Plan will provide a mean-
ingful way for all community members to participate in the process, reduce dispro-
portionate environmental burdens on low-income and minority populations, increase
mobility and access for all residents, identify healthy and affordable housing opportu-
nities for all segments of the community, and define goals and policies to improve air
quality, especially for sensitive population groups.
Mobility Element
New topics related to mobility and its role in San Jacinto have emerged since the Plan
was last updated, including multimodal network connectivity, active transportation,
and regional transit planning. We will work with City staff to refine existing policies and
goals, and to evaluate potential new goals, policies, and programs to reflect new and
emerging City priorities, changing conditions, new State mandates and guidelines,
and recent local and regional planning initiatives. This will include the transportation
policies, goals and objectives for the City, and will address the measures needed to
incorporate future transportation network changes and anticipated citywide growth
projected through build-out of the General Plan.
We expect that the list of topics to be addressed in this element include, but are not
limited to:
» Level of Service (LOS) and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
» Roadway Network Performance
» Transit System
» Travel Demand Management
» Bicycle & Pedestrian Systems
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
23
» Truck Travel
»Emergency Evacuation Routes
» Active Transportation Systems
Using the travel model identified in consultation with Staff, Kittelson will identify the
future roadway network required for the anticipated level of development.
In addition to the roadway network, Kittelson will also identify an initial conceptual
bicycle and pedestrian network for the City. These facilities will include on-street and
off-street bicycle facilities (Classes I-IV) in combination with sidewalks and off-street
pedestrian facilities. As part of this effort, we will incorporate the Trails Master Plan.
Public Safety Element (Safety and Noise)
To assist in streamlining the content of the General Plan, De Novo proposes that the
City address the topic of noise within the Public Safety element. De Novo will also
prepare a Public Safety Element that provides goals, policies, and actions for a variety
of topics, including:
»Fire safety,
»Flooding,
»Seismic safety and geologic hazards,
»Manmade hazards (chemical and pipeline explosions, release of toxic/
hazardous substances, etc.), transportation of hazardous materials,
»Other natural and man-made hazards/disasters
»Noise, and
»Emergency operations and facilities.
Community Facilities Element
Community infrastructure facilities and services also play an essential in providing a
healthy and safe living environment and high quality of life. The De Novo team will co-
ordinate with infrastructure service providers to evaluate standards for levels of service,
future infrastructure improvements, and other needs to support the Land Use Map
and other components of the General Plan Update. Service levels and infrastructure
necessary to keep pace with growth will be identified. The Public Safety Element will
include a recommended list of goals, policies, and action items (including any miti-
gation measures developed during the environmental review process) that address:
»Water supply,
»Wastewater,
»Flood control,
»Solid waste collection and disposal, and
»Storm drainage and water quality.
Public and semi-public community facilities and services must be planned to main-
tain and enhance the high quality of life in the City and to help achieve the City’s vi-
sion for the future. The De Novo team will coordinate with public service providers to
evaluate standards for levels of service and future facilities needs to support the Land
Use Map and other components of the General Plan Update. Service levels necessary
to keep pace with growth will be identified. This element will include a recommended
list of goals, policies, and action items (including any mitigation measures developed
during the environmental review process) that address:
»Police and fire protection,
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
24
»Schools,
»Civic services and functions,
»Parks and recreation,
»Public work maintenance,
»Health care,
»Child care, and
»Libraries, cultural, and community facilities.
Economic Development & Fiscal Sustainability Element
Economic Development is a priority for the City of San Jacinto and we understand
the City's interest in having a Economic Development element as part of the General
Plan. Given its importance, we have included this Element as part of the "core" work
program. In addition to Economic Development goals and policies, we purpose that
this element also include a focused discussion on Fiscal Sustainability. We find that
by covering both topics in one element, the City is provided with more well-rounded
policy guidance regarding this important strategic priority. We expect the Economic
Development Element to focus on:
»Growth and development goals for the local economy, and the public policies
that will support those goals
»How to leverage San Jacinto’s unique economic development opportunities,
as well as emerging sectors, to attract new job opportunities that provide an
improved quality of life for residents
»Expanding and improving retail offerings, both to reflect a changing retail
landscape on the national level and to meet existing demand from the current
residents and businesses through the planning horizon
»Identifying demographic trends in the labor market, including potential
impacts and recommendations for how San Jacinto can maintain a strong
labor force
»Identifying potential impacts of housing prices on the labor force and
potential ways to mitigate impacts
The topics related to fiscal sustainability will focus on diversification of revenue sourc-
es, cost recovery, public/private partnerships, balanced budgets, reserve funds, debt
limitations, and financial asset management. We will also recommend prioritization
of development areas based on property and sales tax revenue generation potential
and the City’s ability to provide cost-effective services to new development.
TASK 4.3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT GP
Following the City’s comments on the Administrative Draft General Plan, De Novo will
prepare the Draft General Plan for public review/comment and use during the City’s
review and approval process. The Public Review Draft General Plan will be prepared
in printed and electronic form. The Public Review Draft General Plan will be provided
to the City for distribution to the public and appropriate agencies and posting on the
City’s website. De Novo will be available to present the Draft General Plan and Draft
Environmental Impact Report in a public workshop and/or Planning Commission and
City Council meetings to provide the decision-makers and community with informa-
tion regarding the intent and structure of the draft documents and to receive com-
ments on the draft documents.
4.3 Deliverables:
»Public Review General
Plan (10 hard copies,
10 CDs with Word and
PDF files)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
25
TASK 4.4 FINAL GENERAL PLAN
We anticipate that a series of public hearings will be held by the Planning Commission
and City Council to consider adoption of the General Plan. As changes are requested
by these decision-making bodies, we will prepare modified General Plan text that will
be provided as attachments to the staff report for Council's consideration. Based on
Council’s direction at the adoption of the General Plan, De Novo will edit the General
Plan to be consistent with any revisions approved by the City Council and will prepare
the final version of the General Plan.
TASK 4.5 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
General Plan implementation is necessary to achieve the vision laid out by the Gen-
eral Plan. The implementation section will provide feasible, practical implementation
methods that ensure the General Plan does not “sit on the shelf” but instead achieves
the goals it sets out. This section will help ground the General Plan in reality and assist
in ensuring that is produces real results. The implementation program will identify
how each implementation measure will be implemented, including the City depart-
ment responsible for implementation, the funding source(s), and timing of implemen-
tation. The De Novo team will work closely with City staff to prepare this section. As
part of this work effort, the team will identify recommended zoning changes to en-
sure that zoning and general plan land use designations are in compliance.
PHASE 5 FOCUSED ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE/GENERAL
PLAN CONFORMANCE
One of the key components of a successful Focused Zoning Ordinance update for the
City will be to ensure that the Zoning Ordinance is consistent with and furthers the
implementation of the General Plan update. The General Plan update will include ac-
tion items that require changes or additions to the Zoning Ordinance. Additionally, the
General Plan Land Use Map may include new and redefined land use designations,
which may require changes and updates to the City’s existing zoning designations and
allowed uses, especially if the City decides to pursue an update to its Housing Element
(described as Optional Task A). We will apply our extensive and detailed knowledge of
the City developed during the General Plan update to this phase of work, and ensure
that the City receives a Zoning Ordinance that furthers the goals and vision developed
for the General Plan.
The Focused Zoning Ordinance update will focus on making the Ordinance more us-
er-friendly, through increased use of graphics and tables to convey information, as well
as addressing changes to the existing Ordinance identified by staff, changes in appli-
cable State law since the last Ordinance was prepared, and identification of changes
required to ensure the Ordinance is consistent with the General Plan update. Terms
and definitions will be contemporary and reflect current planning practices. The re-
sulting product will be a Zoning Ordinance that is well organized and provides clear
and understandable guidance to City residents, staff, and elected officials.
It is anticipated that the work program for the Zoning Ordinance Update will be further
refined once the Draft General Plan is completed. The content and policy direction
contained in the General Plan Update will significantly influence the scope and content
of the Zoning Ordinance Update. As requested by the City, our team is also prepared to
develop a Form Based Zoning Code, a task that would be lead by urban designers and
architects with SWA Group. This approach is presented as Optional Task D.
4.4 Deliverables:
»Admin Final General
Plan (10 hard copies,
10 CDs with Word
and PDF files), Final
General Plan (10 hard
copies, 10 CDs with
Word and PDF files);
5 wall copy updated
color land use maps
4.5 Deliverables:
»Administrative Draft
Administration and
Implementation
Plan (5 copies),
Public Hearing Draft
Administration and
Implementation
Plan (10 copies), Final
Administration and
Implementation Plan
(10 copies)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
26
Task 5.1 Internal Review and Staff Coordination
De Novo will prepare a matrix of General Plan Policies and Actions that may require
changes or revisions to Title 17, Zoning, of the San Jacinto Municipal Code. The matrix
will identify the applicable titles, sections, and chapters of the Municipal Code that
may need to be revised in order to bring the Municipal Code into full consistency with
the General Plan. Following completion of the consistency matrix, De Novo will meet
with City departments heads, or their assigned representatives, to discuss the matrix,
identify any items that require immediate attention, and possible text revisions need-
ed to bring the Municipal Code into consistency with the General Plan.
Task 5.2 Zoning Map Revisions
The De Novo team will prepare a focused update to the Citywide Zoning Map. The
update will be completed at a parcel-specific level for all parcels located within the
City limits. The Zoning Map will be updated to reflect changes to the Citywide Gener-
al Plan Land Use Map, and to ensure consistency between the Land Use and Zoning
Maps. In many instances, there will be multiple zoning districts that are consistent
and compatible with land use designations shown on the General Plan Land Use Map.
Task 5.3 Administrative Draft Zoning Ordinance
The De Novo team will prepare a focused update to the City’s Zoning Ordinance in
administrative draft format, to be used for internal staff review. The focused update to
the Zoning Ordinance will be based on input from City staff; updates required by the
California Government Code, California Building Code, State and Federal Laws, and
local ordinances; policies and action items contained in the General Plan Update; in-
put from the City Council and Planning Commission; and direction received from the
public and stakeholder input. We will also meet and consult with City departments.
Draft Format and Outline
Based on input received from staff and the public, De Novo will prepare a draft an-
notated outline of the key areas of the Zoning Ordinance impacted by the updated
General Plan. After staff review, we will discuss any desired changes and direction for
the preparation of the Zoning Ordinance chapters.
Administrative Draft Zoning Ordinance Preparation
The focused Zoning Ordinance Update is expected to include updates to the Zoning
Map and modifications and/or additions to the zoning districts/development stan-
dards in order to create consistency with the General Plan, including any modifica-
tions as a result of the optional Housing Element Update. Under this task, the focused
Zoning Ordinance Update will be prepared in the same style and format as currently
adopted; as an optional task, our team can undertake a form-based update to the
Zoning Ordinance (see the Optional Tasks identified at the end of the scope of work).
Cannabis Ordinance Review
We understand that the City currently allows the outdoor cultivation of cannabis with-
in the nonconforming, agricultural areas of the City. As part of the focused Zoning Or-
dinance Update, we will review the City's existing ordinance for best practices, General
Plan consistency, and identification of opportunities and challenges for modifications.
Wholesale changes and/or a complete rewriting of the City's existing cannabis ordi-
5.1 Deliverables:
»Zoning Ordinance
Update matrix
and summary
memorandum (7
copies)
5.2 Deliverables:
»Parcel-level zoning
map and GIS data
5.3 Deliverables:
»Administrative Zoning
Ordinance (10 hard
copies and PDF files)
The Zoning Ordinance
will reflect best planning
practices and be shared in
hard copy and online for
public review and comment.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
27
nance are not expected at this time. Should the City wish to pursue a more robust
update than what is planned for in this scope of work and budget, De Novo Planning
Group would be happy to provide a proposal for that work effort.
Task 5.4 Zoning Ordinance Finalization
Following completion of Task 5.3, De Novo Planning Group will prepare a screencheck
draft Zoning Ordinance that addresses the comments received from City staff and any
input from the public. Following City staff approval of the screencheck draft, De Novo
will prepare a draft Zoning Ordinance for public review.
At the conclusion of the public review period for the draft Zoning Ordinance, the De
Novo team will meet with staff and the City Council to discuss and review any public
comments received on the document. Potential changes and edits will be discussed,
and a final Zoning Ordinance will be prepared for adoption.
De Novo present the final Zoning Ordinance to the Planning Commission and City
Council for consideration. Meetings associated with the Zoning Ordinance Update are
included under Tasks 2 and 8 of the work plan.
PHASE 6 CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
The preparation of a stand-alone Climate Action Plan (CAP) will guide future efforts
within the City of San Jacinto towards the achievement of cost effective greenhouse
gas emissions reductions. The CAP will provide a means for integrating the City’s cli-
mate change planning efforts and development review requirements for GHGs into
the City’s updated General Plan. Development of the Climate Action Plan will employ
a five milestone process, which has been extensively used throughout California in
recent years in the preparation of Climate Action Plans:
1. Develop a Baseline Emissions Inventory
2. Establish and Adopt an Emissions Reduction Target
3. Develop a Climate Action Plan
4. Implement the Climate Action Plan
5. Monitor and Evaluate Progress
These steps are described in our work program on the following pages.
WRCOG Subregional Climate Action Plan
We understand that WRCOG prepared a subregional Climate Action Plan in 2014. In
the WRCOG CAP, the City of San Jacinto is identified as a Subregional CAP participant
as well as a participant in the WRELP Energy Action Plan. This effort included estab-
lishing a baseline inventory for San Jacinto that quantified GHG emissions resulting
from the community and government operations. The baseline inventory included
emissions from the following sectors: residential energy, commercial/industrial energy,
transportation, waste, and wastewater. 2010 is the inventory base year used for San
Jacinto and most other participating jurisdictions.
5.4 Deliverables:
»Final Zoning
Ordinance (10 hard
copies, PDF files, 5
large-format wall
copies of final Zoning
Map)
The City of San Jacinto
can use information
prepared for the WRCOG
Subregional CAP as it
addresses climate change
at the local level. This
results in a streamlined
project schedule and budget
efficiencies while creating
a plan that reflects local
conditions and priorities.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
28
Although the City of San Jacinto did not formally adopt the Subregional CAP following
its preparation, our approach to development a standalone CAP for the City relies on
WRCOG's past work effort in order to streamline data collection, preparation of a base-
line inventory, and identification of regionally-appropriate reduction strategies. While
we expect to use the Subregional CAP as a starting point, as part of this work effort
we will also identify jurisdiction-specific data, targets, and monitoring and evaluation
programs best-suited to San Jacinto.
ICLEI Membership
In order to prepare the Climate Action Plan for San Jacinto, we are proposing that
the City become a full member of ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability (mem-
bership is approximately $600/year). ICLEI is an international association of local gov-
ernments as well as national and regional local government organizations who have
made a commitment to sustainable development and reductions in GHG emissions.
ICLEI provides technical consulting, training, and information services to build capaci-
ty, share knowledge, and support local government in the implementation of sustain-
able development at the local level. The primary reason that the City would want to
join ICLEI as part of this CAP process is to gain access to their comprehensive climate
planning software packages and resources.
The ICLEI software package is the most commonly used platform for the develop-
ment of Baseline Emissions Inventories and the quantification of the effectiveness of
GHG reduction measures in a Climate Action Plan. The software estimates emissions
derived from energy consumption and waste generated with-in a community, deter-
mining emissions using specific factors (or coefficients) according to the type of fuel
used. Emissions are aggregated and reported in terms of carbon dioxide equivalent
units, or eCO2. Converting all emissions into carbon dioxide equivalent units allows for
the consideration of different greenhouse gasses in comparable terms. For example,
methane is 21 times more powerful than carbon dioxide in its capacity to trap heat, so
the model converts one ton of methane emissions to 21 tons of eCO2.
Upon receipt of membership approval, the City will have full access to the software
package, which will be used throughout all stages of the CAP process. Upon comple-
tion of the CAP project, the City will retain access to the software, which can be used
to track implementation progress of the CAP, and to conduct periodic updates of the
CAP. The De Novo team has used this software to prepare other CAPs in California, and
we are well versed in its use and function. The De Novo team and the City cannot gain
access to the ICLEI software without the City becoming a member of ICLEI.
The emissions coefficients and methodology employed by the software are consistent
with national and international inventory standards established by the Intergovern-
mental Panel on Climate Change (1996 Revised IPCC Guidelines for the Preparation
of National GHG Emissions Inventories), the U.S. Voluntary Greenhouse Gas Reporting
Guidelines (EIA form 1605), and, for emissions generated from solid waste, the U.S.
EPA’s Waste Reduction Model (WARM).
TASK 6.1 DEVELOP A BASELINE GHG EMISSIONS INVENTORY
Project Initiation and Kickoff Meeting
Our first step in the process will be to meet with City staff and representatives from rel-
evant agencies, if appropriate, to discuss our approach to the preparation of the CAP
and Baseline Emissions Inventory. This meeting would address the overall approach to
the CAP, including its outline and concurrent preparation of the General Plan and EIR
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
29
to ensure that two documents are integrated seamlessly. The meeting will also focus
on data sources and availability, team roles in the collection of baseline data, and the
selection of a suitable baseline year for analysis. Many jurisdictions in California that
have recently prepared CAPs have selected 2005 as the base year. However, the City
may prefer to select a more recent year for the baseline analysis (2009 or 2010 may be
appropriate, depending on the availability of data).
The kickoff meeting will be used to establish protocols for project communications,
begin initial data collection and review available data sources. We will also assist the
City in the preparation of the application materials to join ICLEI. The application pro-
cess is relatively simple, and can be completed within two days of project initiation.
As previously stated in this proposal, the membership costs for joining ICLEI are not
included in our project budget.
The De Novo team will present suggestions for the organization and categorization of
the baseline emissions inventory. For example, the City may want to divide emissions
into two primary categories: 1) Municipal Operations and 2) Community-wide Emis-
sions. These two categories would then be broken down into more specific subcate-
gories such as: Energy Consumption, Solid Waste, Vehicle Fuel Usage, and Major Sta-
tionary Sources. We will provide suggestions to the City based on our past experience
conducting baseline emissions inventories, and other commonly applied practices in
the preparation of CAPs.
Conduct a Baseline Emissions Inventory and Forecast
As part of this task, the De Novo team will review the inventory completed for the
City as part of the Subregional CAP process and complete a comprehensive updated
inventory of GHG emissions for the City of San Jacinto. The inventory will address emis-
sions associated with municipal operations and community-wide operations, both of
which will be further divided into subcategories. De Novo will assume primary respon-
sibility for the collection of data. However, for many of the municipal emissions data,
we will rely on appropriate City staff to assist with data collection. We have prepared
form templates that will facilitate this effort.
Once the baseline emissions data has been collected, the data will be entered into
the GHG software, and all GHG emissions will be converted into CO2 equivalents. The
De Novo team will prepare a detailed Baseline Emissions Inventory Report, which will
include the following:
»Introduction; Baseline Emissions Inventory Report: Purpose; Overview of San
Jacinto’s existing GHG reduction efforts; Summary of the effects of global
climate change; Summary of the current regulatory environment for climate
change
»Emissions Inventory; Reasoning, Methodology and Model; Inventory Results;
Community-level emissions inventory (separated by source); Municipal
operations emissions inventory (separated by source)
»Forecast for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
»Conclusions
The GHG “business as usual” forecasts will be prepared for the years 2030 and 2040.
The emissions forecasts will utilize City growth projections developed for the preferred
6.1 Deliverables:
»Draft and Final
Baseline Emissions
Inventory Report
(electronic copy only)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
30
General Plan Land Use Map. These projections will then be adjusted for State- or Fed-
erally-mandated efficiency efforts including the Pavley low-emission vehicle stan-
dards, Low Carbon Fuel Standard, Renewable Portfolio Standard, and CAFÉ standards.
The Baseline Emissions Inventory Report will be written in a clear and concise man-
ner, and will be understandable to the lay-person. All technical data, including model
inputs and assumptions used in the analysis will be presented in appendices to the
Report.
A Draft Baseline Emissions Inventory Report will be presented to Staff for review and
comment, and based on their feedback, the Final Baseline Emissions Inventory Report
will be prepared. The De Novo team will then present the Final Baseline Emissions
Inventory Report to the City Council.
TASK 6.2 ESTABLISH EMISSIONS REDUCTION TARGET
After completion of the Baseline Emissions Inventory Report, the De Novo team will
prepare a comprehensive memorandum that provides suggestions for the selection of
a Target Reduction Goal. The memo will include a summary of the regulatory require-
ments applicable to the CAP (such as AB 32 and SB 32), and will include a summary
of reduction targets adopted by other jurisdictions in California, including those en-
dorsed by the Attorney General’s office and the California Air Resources Board (CARB).
Based on the results and findings in the Baseline Emissions Inventory Report, we will
prepare an overview and summary of various strategies that may be employed to
reach the Target Reduction Goal, and discuss the feasibility of these strategies, both in
terms of implementation and in meeting the potential Target Reduction Goal.
The results of the Baseline Emissions Inventory and the summary of potential Target
Reduction Goals and implementation strategies will be presented to the City Council.
The City Council will be asked to formally select the Target Reduction Goal to be used
in the Climate Action Plan.
TASK 6.3 PREPARE CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
After a percentage reduction target has been selected by the City Council, the De
Novo team will prepare a comprehensive plan to reduce GHG emissions. The Climate
Action Plan will contain measures and policies that reduce GHG emissions based on
the categories and subcategories from the Baseline Emissions Inventory. The GHG
reduction measures will be modeled on the measures and strategies contained in the
WRCOG Subregional CAP, to the extent practical, in order to provide for synergy and
consistency with ongoing regional efforts.
The Climate Action Plan will include all of the information contained in the Baseline
Emissions Inventory, including a discussion of existing climate change science, the
effects and impacts of climate change (with particular emphasis on how San Jacinto
may be impacted), and a summary of actions currently being taken by State, Federal
and local agencies on climate change. The CAP will also include a summary of the
Baseline Emissions Inventory Results, and the emissions forecasts for “business as usu-
al” for the years 2030 and 2040.
The measures and policies in the CAP will build off of efforts associated with develop-
ment of the General Plan, and will be reflective of the community input received with
respect to the vision and priorities of the General Plan Update.
6.2 Deliverables:
»Target Reduction
Goal Memorandum
(electronic copy only)
6.3 Deliverables:
»Administrative Draft
CAP (5 hard copies
and electronic copy),
Screencheck Draft CAP
(5 hard copies and
electronic copy), Public
Review Draft CAP
(20 hard copies and
electronic copy), Final
CAP (30 hard copies
and electronic copy)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
31
The measures and policies for reducing GHG levels that are developed will be specific
to the City of San Jacinto, and will provide the City and the development community
with a clear and implementable toolkit that can be used to streamline the subse-
quent review of development projects with respect to GHG impacts. The measures
and policies will apply comprehensive strategies to reduce GHG emissions levels asso-
ciated with both community and municipal operations.
Identify Preliminary Emissions Reduction Measures
A preliminary list of GHG reduction measures for possible inclusion in the CAP will
be prepared and presented to City staff for review and consideration. The list will be
built based on a review of best practice documents and strategies, recently adopted
CAPs in the region (including the WRCOG Subregional CAP), and regulatory guidance
provided by CARB, the SQACMD and the Attorney General’s Office. Emission reduc-
tion measures will be identified in primary categories such as energy, transportation
and land use, and solid waste. Emissions reductions strategies will be developed to
address both community and municipal emissions sources.
Evaluate Emissions Reduction Measures
Once the preliminary GHG reduction measures have been reviewed and evaluated
by City staff, the list of measures will be further refined and expanded, as-needed. As
each measure or policy is developed, we will create assumptions regarding the effec-
tiveness and implementation for each measure. The assumptions will be based on
similar assumptions used in other jurisdictions for similar measures, information de-
veloped by the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) Climate
Protection Committee, and our vast experience in developing and implementing cli-
mate change reduction strategies for General Plans and EIRs.
As each measure or policy is developed, we will utilize the GHG software program
to estimate the effectiveness of each measure or policy in reducing GHG levels and
in meeting the Target Reduction Goal. By quantifying the effectiveness of measures
during the development of the CAP, we will be able to focus the policy development
in a manner that provides maximum benefit with respect to cost of implementation.
In other words, we will figure out how the City can get the most bang for the buck
from each measure or policy, which will assist in the development and prioritization of
the implementation strategy.
Our team will prepare qualitative assessments for each of the measures to estimate
the measure’s costs, benefits, and effectiveness in terms of reducing GHGs. Our team
will work collaboratively with City staff to prioritize the portfolio of emissions reduction
measures, and develop a more refined list of measures to be included in the Draft
Climate Action Plan.
Develop Draft Climate Action Plan
The exact content and layout of the CAP will be developed in consultation with City
staff, however, for the purposes of this proposal, a sample outline of the CAP is provid-
ed below:
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
32
» Executive Summary
» Introduction; Climate Change Impacts at the Local Level; Signs of Ongoing
Climate Change; The Science Behind Climate Change; The Regulatory
Environment related to Climate Change; San Jacinto’s Commitment to GHG
Reductions; The Five Milestones to Reduce GHGs
» San Jacinto’s GHG Emissions and Reduction Target; Transportation Emissions;
Energy Emissions; Sol-ids Waste and Recycling Emissions; Major Stationary
Source Emissions; San Jacinto GHG Forecasts; GHG Reduction Target
»Local Action Plan for Climate Protection Initiatives; Transportation and Land
Use Initiatives; Energy Initiatives; Waste and Recycling Initiatives; Major
Stationary Sources Initiatives; Outreach and Education Initiatives
»Implementation and Monitoring
»Technical Appendices
The GHG reductions measures will be developed based on the input received from
staff under Tasks 6.3. The effectiveness of each measure will be quantified using the
GHG software, and the total GHG emissions reductions projected through 2030 and
2040 as a result of implementation of the Climate Action Plan will be presented.
The implementation and monitoring program developed for the CAP will include a
summary matrix that identifies the priority for implementation of each measure, the
timeframe for implementation of each measure, and identify the agency, department,
or party responsible for measure implementation. Possible funding sources for the
implementation of measures will be identified. A monitoring and reporting protocol
will be developed as a tool for the City to use after adoption of the CAP, to ensure that
priority measures are properly implemented within the timeframes identified.
The CAP will also provide a summary table of measures that would be required by fu-
ture development projects. This tool will provide a clear and straight-forward reference
to the development community, and will assist staff in their review of development
projects for consistency with the CAP. This tool will also assist with the CEQA review
of subsequent projects, and will detail how projects may be eligible for streamlined
CEQA review if appropriate CAP measures are correctly integrated into project plans.
A complete Administrative Draft copy of the Climate Action Plan will be provided to
staff for review and comment. Once comments on the Admin Draft CAP are received,
the De Novo team will prepare a “screencheck” draft CAP for final review.
The Public Draft Climate Action Plan will be prepared and distributed. The exact tim-
ing of the distribution of the Draft Climate Action Plan will be determined through
consultation with City staff. For the purposes of this proposal, it is assumed that the
Public Draft Climate Action Plan will be released for public review concurrent with the
Public Draft General Plan. It is assumed that public hearings on the Climate Action
Plan will occur concurrently with hearings on the General Plan and EIR.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
33
PHASE 7 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE
The work plan described below will result in the preparation of a Program-level EIR.
The EIR will address all potential environmental impacts associated with implemen-
tation of the General Plan Update. The Program-EIR will serve as a “tiering document”
to facilitate streamlined environmental review of all subsequent development, plan-
ning, and infrastructure projects undertaken in the City, which are consistent with the
General Plan.
TASK 7.1 EIR KICK-OFF AND NOTICE OF PREPARATION/INITIAL
STUDY
This task includes kicking off the EIR and preparing the Notice of Preparation/Initial
Study.
EIR Initiation
De Novo will meet with the City staff team to initiate the EIR portion of the work plan.
The purpose of the meeting will be to identify concerns and issues that have arisen
since the first start-up meeting, review information needs, and discuss scheduling and
expectations for the environmental setting and environmental review process.
Project Description
This section of the Draft EIR will be consistent with the requirements of State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15124 and will provide a detailed description of the General Plan Up-
date appropriate for the programmatic analysis of environmental impacts. This section
will describe project components (e.g., land use map, policies/actions, circulation dia-
gram, phasing of the project, and planned roadway and infrastructure improvements,),
expected rate/extent of development under the project including any phasing, utility
and public service expansion (e.g., water, wastewater, solid waste, fire, law enforcement),
and clear identification of what would be defined as a “subsequent project” under the
General Plan Update. The City’s objectives for the project will be described. In addition,
graphics illustrating the proposed project and a description of anticipated actions as-
sociated with the project will be provided. The Project Description will support the an-
ticipated development intensity and land uses envisioned for the General Plan, and will
provide flexibility in regards to the evaluation of subsequent projects.
Significance Criteria
A draft set of significance criteria will be prepared for review by staff. The significance
criteria will include proposed criteria for each topical issue to be addressed in the EIR
and will be based on Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines as well as plans, regula-
tions, and ordinances adopted by the City and, to the extent applicable, by state and
regional agencies, such as WRCOG, CDFW, and Caltrans. Early agreement regarding
significance criteria will help to focus the setting information and the impact analyses
provided in the EIR.
Notice of Preparation/Initial Study/Scoping Meeting
De Novo will prepare the Notice of Preparation (NOP) and associated initial study in
accordance with the requirements of CEQA in order to define the scope of the environ-
mental analysis. An administrative draft of the NOP and initial study will be prepared for
City review, and based on comments received, De Novo will prepare the final NOP and
initial study for public distribution. De Novo will submit 15 copies to the State Clearing-
house on behalf of the City.
7.1 Deliverables:
»Administrative Draft
Notice of Preparation/
Initial Study (5
copies), Final Notice
of Preparation/Initial
Study (5 copies),
facilitation of one
scoping meeting
and summary notes,
coordination with local,
regional and state
agencies as necessary
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
34
The project will require a public scoping meeting, and De Novo will prepare presen-
tation materials and facilitate the meeting. The scoping meeting will include an over-
view of the General Plan Update project and the environmental review process, as well
as identification of environmental issues that will be addressed in the EIR. After com-
pletion of the scoping meeting, De Novo will provide a summary of environmental
issues raised. In addition, De Novo (in coordination with the City) will seek one-on-one
meetings with key local, regional, and state agencies.
TASK 7.2 NATIVE AMERICAN CONSULTATION
The DUKE CRM Team will assist the City with Native American consultation required
under both SB 18 and AB 52. DUKE CRM will contact the Native American Heritage
Commission (NAHC) to request a Sacred Lands file search and a list of Native Ameri-
cans. DUKE CRM anticipates that this list will include the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indi-
ans, the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians and several other Bands of Luiseño and Ca-
huilla Indians. First, DUKE CRM will draft notification letters to be provided to the City
and sent out on City letter-head. After 4 weeks DUKE CRM, on behalf of the City, will
make follow-up phone calls and/or send emails to groups that have not responded.
The purpose of the letter and follow-up is to notify the Tribes of the project and invite
comment and consultation with the City. It is important to note that the consultation
required under both AB 52 and SB 18 is between Tribes and the City. DUKE CRM will
coordinate and attend up to five meetings with the City and Native American groups.
Additional meetings will require additional budget.
TASK 7.3 DRAFT EIR
The Draft EIR will be a Program EIR prepared consistent with the requirements of
CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and relevant case law. The Draft EIR will be a readable,
useful document that can be used to streamline review of future planning, infrastruc-
ture, and development projects that are consistent with the General Plan.
We will rely on the content developed for the Existing Conditions Report (ECR) when
preparing the Draft EIR. In particular, the Existing Setting and Regulatory Framework
for each topic area will be discussed in the ECR and then integrated in the Draft EIR
as appropriate in Chapter 3 (described below). This streamlined approach ensures
consistency across documents, maintains an expeditious project schedule, and re-
duced costs associated with development of the EIR. The Draft EIR will consist of the
chapters described below.
Executive Summary
This section will summarize the characteristics of the General Plan Update, describe
areas of controversy, and provide a concise summary matrix of the project’s environ-
mental impacts and associated mitigation measures as required under State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15123. The matrix will also identify proposed General Plan Update
policies and actions that provide mitigation of identified environmental impacts. Al-
ternatives to the proposed project will be summarized and the environmentally supe-
rior alternative will be identified.
Chapter 1: Introduction
This Section of the Draft EIR will provide an introduction and overview describing
the intended use of the EIR and the review and certification process. This section will
describe the purpose of the EIR, identify CEQA Guidelines and Public Resource Code
7.2 Deliverables:
»SB 18 and AB 52
consultation, including
consultation letters,
follow-up phone calls,
and coordination and
attendance at up to 5
meetings with the City
and Native American
groups
7.3 Deliverables:
»Administrative Draft
EIR (5 hard copies,
5 CDs), Screencheck
Draft EIR (5 copies,
5 CDs), Draft EIR (5
copies, 30 CDs), Notice
of Availability
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
35
requirements for a Program EIR, and describe how the Program EIR can be used to
streamline environmental review of subsequent projects. A flowchart will be included
that shows the process for subsequent environmental documents, identifying when
it would be appropriate to prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration versus a Focused
or Project-level EIR.
Chapter 2: Project Description
This Section of the Draft EIR will be consistent with the requirements of State CEQA
Guidelines Section 15124 and will be based on the Project Description prepared under
Task 7.1, described above.
Chapter 3: Environmental Setting, Impacts and Mitigation Measures
This chapter will provide the baseline setting, general assumptions, and environmen-
tal analysis used in determining the environmental effects of the project. This chapter
will include an introductory section providing details on the “baseline conditions” as-
sumptions for the analysis, land use forecasts for residential and non-residential uses,
level of detail of programmatic analysis, consideration of key components of the proj-
ect (e.g., location of future growth, continued highest and best use of resources, con-
servation of natural resources, circulation system modifications, risks associated with
seismic and soil contamination hazards), and definition of the cumulative setting (e.g.,
geographic extent) and impact analysis. This section will also describe how direct and
indirect environmental impacts are addressed associated with implementation of the
General Plan Update and the multiple actions that may occur associated with its im-
plementation (e.g., adoption of infrastructure master plans, update of CIPs, annexation
requests, public service improvements).
Population, housing units, and non-residential uses, including employment, will be
projected for the City under buildout conditions. The Draft EIR will analyze impacts as-
sociated with buildout conditions. This section will describe the basis of and approach
to the impact analysis in the Draft EIR. The EIR will evaluate each of the following
environmental issues in detail:
»Aesthetics and Visual
Resources
»Agricultural and Forest
Resources
»Air Quality
»Biological Resources
»Cultural and Tribal
Resources
»Geology, Soils, and
Seismicity
»Greenhouse Gas Emissions
»Hazards and Hazardous
Materials
»Hydrology and Water
Quality
»Land Use and Planning
»Mineral and Energy
Resources
»Noise
»Population, Housing, and
Employment
»Public Services
»Recreation, Parks, and
Open Space
»Transportation and
Circulation
»Utilities and Service
Systems
For each issue area, we will discuss in detail the existing setting (based on the infor-
mation provided in the Existing Conditions Report prepared in Phase 1), Regulatory
Framework, and Impacts and Mitigation Measures. De Novo will work closely with
City staff on crafting mitigation measure language and timing that is appropriate for
inclusion in the General Plan Update and is suitable for use in the typical development
review process.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
36
Chapter 4: Cumulative Impacts
De Novo will assess the impacts of General Plan implementation in combination with
other known, approved or reasonably foreseeable development activity in the region.
This analysis will be performed consistent with State CEQA Guidelines and be based
on a list of known projects in the region as well as development forecasts contained
in the City, as well as consideration of General Plan updates in the region. A table sum-
marizing projected regional growth will be provided. A clear cumulative setting for
each environmental topic will be described in the Draft EIR.
The cumulative analysis will address each topic covered in the environmental analysis
(e.g., water supply, traffic, biological resources, etc.) and will identify appropriate miti-
gation measures for any significant impacts identified. The potential for the project to
induce growth, either through designation of land for growth, extension of services and
infrastructure, or other project characteristics that may encourage and facilitate growth
in the area, will be evaluated.
Chapter 5: Other CEQA Requirements
The chapter will address other topics required by CEQA including significant irrevers-
ible environmental effects, a summary of significant and unavoidable impacts of the
project, identification of environmental areas that would have no or less than signifi-
cant impact, and an evaluation of the project related to each of the mandatory find-
ings of significance identified at Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines.
Chapter 6: Alternatives Analysis
De Novo will coordinate with City staff in the development of up to three alternatives
to the proposed project, including the CEQA-required No Project Alternative. The al-
ternatives analysis in the Draft EIR will focus on alternatives that avoid or minimize
environmental effects as compared to the proposed General Plan Update. These al-
ternatives will be described qualitatively and quantitatively, and contrasted with the
proposed project in terms of the extent that the alternatives can achieve project ob-
jectives or reduce adverse impacts.
This analysis will be presented in a separate chapter of the EIR and will include a com-
parative matrix of the alternatives to the proposed project based on the significant
environmental effects identified in the Draft EIR. Based on this analysis, the environ-
mentally superior alternative will be identified as required by CEQA.
Chapter 7: Report Preparers and References
This chapter would identify all persons assisting in the preparation of the EIR and refer-
enced agencies/materials.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
37
TASK 7.4 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND MMRP
At the conclusion of the Draft EIR public review period, the De Novo team will re-
spond to all written comments received by the City, as well as oral comments received
during public hearings. Upon completion, copies of the Administrative Final EIR will
be forwarded to the City for review. The Final EIR document, which will be a separately
bound, will include the comment letters, responses, and revisions to the Draft (text to
be revised will be shown as an excerpt demarcated with underline for new text and
strikethrough for deleted text).
With respect to the Final EIR and Response to Comments, the De Novo team antici-
pates 40 comment letters of normal detail (two to three pages in length), based upon
our prior experience with projects of similar scope. Excess comments and/or complex
comments that require additional technical analysis will be considered outside of this
scope of work and cost estimate. We also assume one round of City review of the Ad-
ministrative Final EIR and one round of City review of the Screencheck Final EIR prior
to public release.
The Final EIR will include a comprehensive Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Pro-
gram (MMRP) pursuant to Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code. De Novo will
draft the MMRP using the information contained within the environmental analysis,
including the specific mitigation measures, and how the mitigation measures will be
incorporated into the General Plan Update.
CEQA Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations
CEQA Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations (Findings) will be pre-
pared that identify each potentially significant and significant impact, describe mit-
igation for the impact, and the resultant level of significance after mitigation. The
Findings will identify each alternative and, if the alternative was not selected as the
proposed project, identify why the alternative was not feasible and considerations for
not selecting the alternative. For each significant and unavoidable impact, the Find-
ings will identify economic, legal, social, technical, or other defensible reasons why the
project should be approved in light of the significant effects of the project.
Phase 8 MEETINGS, HEARINGS, AND MANAGEMENT
De Novo will serve as the Prime Consultant and manage all regular communication
with the City of San Jacinto Planning Department, presentations to the Planning Com-
mission and City Council, and overall project management and adherence to the proj-
ect schedule.
TASK 8.1 STUDY SESSIONS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS
Throughout the process, it will be necessary to provide information and received feed-
back from the Planning Commission and City Council on a number of topics, includ-
ing the Vision Plan and preferred plan. We recommend hosting study sessions with
each body during their regularly scheduled meeting to discuss these topics. At the
conclusion of the project, it will also be necessary to present the Updated General Plan
and EIR to the Planning Commission and Council for their review and approval during
a public hearing. Based on direction included in the RFP, we expect to hold up to four
public hearings with Planning Commission and two with Council.
7.4 Deliverables:
»Draft Mitigation and
Monitoring Program
(10 copies, 10 CDs),
Mitigation and
Monitoring Program
for Public Review
(10 copies, 10 CDs),
Draft Findings of
Fact and Statement
of Overriding
Considerations (10
copies, 10 CDs),
Findings of Fact
and Statement
of Overriding
Considerations for
Public Review (10
copies, 10 CDs), All RTC
(10 copies, 10 CDs),
Admin Final EIR (10
copies, 10 CDs), Final
EIR (10 copies, 10 CDs)
8.1 Deliverables:
»Facilitation of six study
sessions with Planning
Commission and/or
Council, facilitation
of up to six public
hearings (attendance
by Kittelson and EPS at
two public hearings)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
38
TASK 8.2 MEETINGS WITH CITY STAFF
De Novo will facilitate monthly in-person meetings with City staff to ensure that the
project is on time, on budget, and that any issues are quickly resolved. These meetings
are in addition to the community open houses, interviews, and other outreach pro-
grams identified in Phase 2.
TASK 8.3 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
As described previously in this proposal, our strategy includes two dedicated project
managers who will be hands-on throughout the project. Our internal administration
procedures include: regular check-ins with subconsultant teams, internal weekly con-
ference calls with the management team from De Novo and each subconsultant (as
relevant to the timing of the task of each subconsultant), weekly updates to the task list,
including internal deliverables necessary to meet our deliverables to the City, and estab-
lishment of a secure online file sharing site to assure that all background documents,
technical reports, updated schedules, and approach memos are readily available to
each team member.
Optional Tasks
As requested in the RFP, we have included a range of optional tasks for the City's con-
sideration, as outlined below.
TASK A: HOSING ELEMENT 6TH CYCLE UPDATE
The Housing Element Update will be developed to meet the City’s needs and changes
in state law. This Scope of Work includes all tasks necessary to prepare the Update and
process it through HCD.
Task A.1 Administrative Draft Housing Element
De Novo is committed to providing the City with a useful and understandable Housing
Element Update that embodies the goals and priorities of the City and is consistent
with state requirements (GC Section 65583[a]). Preparation of the Housing Element
will include but not be limited to the following sections.
Introduction
The Housing Element will include an introductory chapter that provides an overview
of the Housing Element update process, housing issues facing San Jacinto, the City’s
housing needs, available sites and resources, and the goals of the Housing Element.
Evaluate the Current Housing Element
De Novo will review and evaluate the current Housing Element and provide additional
information, including suggested modifications to policies as necessary. Based on the
effectiveness of the existing document, input received from the community during
the public participation process, and communication with City staff, we will identify
policies and programs that should be retained as well as those that should be revised
or replaced. This section will include a narrative that discusses the: (1) actual results of
the current Element compared to its goals, policies, and implementation measures;
and (2) significant differences between objectives and actual achievements.
Housing Needs Assessment
To prepare a meaningful Housing Element, existing conditions must be understood
and documented. De Novo will assess the housing needs of the City’s population
8.2 Deliverables:
»Monthly in-person
meetings with City
Staff
8.3 Deliverables:
»Ongoing project
administration lead by
the Project Manager
and Co-Project
Manager (24-month
schedule)
A1 Deliverables:
»Administrative Draft
Housing Element (5
hard copies, 5 CDs
with Word and PDF
files)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
39
based on the characteristics of the City’s population and its existing housing inventory.
The needs assessment will be based on available data, including 2010 Census, 2017,
Department of Finance estimates, Employment Development Department data, and
US Agricultural Census. This work effort will include the following:
»Existing housing conditions
»At-risk housing
»Population, housing and employment characteristics
»Special needs groups
»Regional housing needs
Inventory of Resources and Constraints
The Housing Element will identify available resources, including land, funding, and hous-
ing programs, available to meet the City’s housing needs. Constraints to meeting hous-
ing needs, including governmental constraints (land use controls, parking standards,
etc.) and non-governmental constraints (environmental, availability of financing, etc.), will
be described. De Novo will develop a program to reduce constraints, where appropriate
and feasible. This section will include the following required topics:
»Available sites
»Financial and other resources
»Residential energy conservation
»Governmental constraints
»Non-governmental constraints
Goals, Objectives, and Implementation Plan
De Novo will present goals, objectives, policies, and implementation measures to ad-
dress identified housing needs and constraints. The approach to meeting housing
needs will be developed to address the City’s housing needs while also: 1) remaining
relevant to a historic, mostly built-out community, 2) protecting important resources,
including historic resources, habitat and water supply, and 3) promoting sustainability
and walkability. The implementation plan will identify sustainable housing policies
and programs, based on City staff, public and stakeholder input, City guidance, and
the needs identified in the needs and constraints analysis. De Novo will hold a work-
shop with City staff to discuss the proposed revisions to the City’s existing goals, pol-
icies, and programs, and De Novo will also present for discussion additional policies
and strategies that fit the unique needs and character of San Jacinto.
Implementation measures will address both short-term and long-range strategies and
may include development controls, regulatory incentives, constraint-removal programs,
fair housing programs, and sources of affordable housing funding. The implementation
measures will identify parties responsible for implementation, a timeframe for imple-
mentation, and funding sources. Where appropriate, phasing and financing options will
be identified. Implementation measures will reflect recent legislation, and will address
the following issues at a minimum:
»Conserve and Improve Existing Housing Stock
»Promote Housing Opportunities for All Persons in the City, including provision
of adequate sites to accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Allocation
»Address Housing Needs of Special Needs Populations
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
40
»Preserve Assisted Housing
»Regional Housing Needs Determination and Five-Year Quantified Objectives
»General Plan and Zoning Consistency
»Sustainability and Efficiency, including energy efficiency, green building
practices, progressive energy and water conservation approaches, and
requirements of AB 32
»Removal of Constraints (where appropriate and feasible)
We will review proposed policies and implementation measures for internal consis-
tency with all elements of the City’s General Plan. Should there be inconsistencies,
we will identify the appropriate modifications that should be made to the proposed
policies and measures or to the relevant element of the General Plan.
Task A.2 Public Draft Housing Element
We will incorporate the City’s comments on the Administrative Draft Housing Element
and create a Public Review Draft Housing Element for Planning Commission and City
Council input.
Task A.3 Final Housing Element
De Novo will incorporate City staff, Planning Commission, and City Council comments
on the Public Review Draft Housing Element and create the Final Housing Element
that will be delivered to HCD.
Task A.4 HCD Coordination
De Novo will coordinate closely with HCD in order to receive a letter indicating that
the updated Housing Element complies with State law. Our approach to working with
HCD is to be very responsive to HCD’s preliminary comments and requests. HCD typ-
ically schedules a conference call with the consultant and City staff to identify con-
cerns with the Housing Element prior to issuing its formal comment letter. We have
found that by attending these meetings in person at HCD’s offices (attended by staff
in our Sacramento area office) and discussing potential revisions during the meeting,
multiple issues can be resolved and better direction is received from HCD. Following
these meetings, De Novo will immediately prepare revised text for City and HCD staff
to review and consider before the formal letter goes out. In this manner, we work to
resolve issues during the review period in order to reduce the number of formal com-
ments received from HCD.
Upon receipt of HCD’s formal comments, we will prepare proposed revisions and pro-
vide them to City staff for review. Throughout this task, De Novo will be available for
in-person meetings with HCD staff at HCD’s offices in Sacramento. Once HCD indi-
cates that their concerns are addressed, we will prepare a Revised Draft Housing Ele-
ment for formal submission to HCD and, with their approval, the Housing Element will
be ready for adoption. It is anticipated that the Housing Element will be adopted as
part of the General Plan Update. If the City desires to adopt the Housing Element in
advance of the General Plan Update, De Novo will prepare a Negative Declaration as
part of Task 6. This does not include technical studies specific to the Housing Element
to support the environmental document.
Deliverables:
»Public Review Draft
Housing Element (5
hard copies, 5 CDs
with Word and PDF
files)
Deliverables:
»Final Housing Element
(5 hard copies, 5 CDs
with Word and PDF
files)
Deliverables:
»Three meetings (in-
person) with HCD
and conference calls
as-needed
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
41
TASK B: INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Following the adoption of General Plans and associated EIR De Novo has prepared,
several cities have invited us back immediately to provide on-call CEQA services as-
sociated with the review of project applications. As part of this effort, our team has
completed detailed and customized Initial Study Checklists to be used as the stan-
dard template for the subsequent environmental review of projects (usually in the
form of Mitigated Negative Declarations or CEQA Section 15183 exemptions). These
customized checklists include references to policies and actions within the General
Plan that are applicable to a range of project types, or provide mitigation for potential
environmental impacts. We also include baseline environmental information in the
Checklists (such as water supply data, sewer treatment capacity, public services such
as police, fire, etc) that helps to provide detailed analysis in the Initial Study, while
streamling the preparation of existing setting baseline data.
In this optional task, the De Novo team will prepare an Initial Study Checklist that the
City can use during the subsequent review of development projects and other City-ini-
tiated projects subject to CEQA. The Checklist will identify applicable thresholds of sig-
nificance, General Plan policies and actions that must be implemented by the project,
and baseline existing conditions information relative to each environmental topic under
CEQA Guidelines Appendix G.
TASK C: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES PROGRAM
As an addendum to the Economic Development Element, EPS will evaluate and rec-
ommend an implementation strategy for incentivizing economic growth and devel-
opment. The strategy will be based on a set of discrete and complimentary policies,
tools, and resources that the City or partner entities can effectively deploy to achieve
desired outcomes. For each of the identified initiatives, EPS will describe the necessary
implementation steps, time-frame, and responsible parties.
Generally speaking, local economic incentives fall into three inter-related categories:
(1) regulatory (including land use), (2) financial and (3) organizational. Regulatory ini-
tiatives can reduce barriers or restrictions that may be preventing new development
or businesses from locating in the City. Financial incentives can include a range of tax
or fee relief as well as assistance with infrastructure, land assembly, or other key inputs
that reduce costs and/or increase return on investment. Organizational support en-
compasses a broader range of activities conducted directly or facilitated by the City
related to business development and marketing, including tenant or employee re-
cruitment, training, “fast-tracking” of approvals, and even support for local business or
property organizations such as P/BIDs. The most effective suite of incentives generally
requires a complimentary mix from all of the above categories that is tailored to the
unique economic and institutional context of City pursuing them.
As a first step, EPS will review the City’s existing development incentive tools, resourc-
es, and related implementation and organizational capacity, and the impact that they
have had on driving development in the city. In addition, EPS will review best practices
in peer or similar cities, (based on our work around the State and targeted research)
to produce initial set of options detailing economic development incentives tools that
will likely be most successful in San Jacinto. This will include information on the spe-
cific implementation requirements of each incentive tool, the most appropriate land
Deliverables:
»Administrative Draft
and Final Initial Study
Checklist
Deliverables:
»Economic
Development
Incentives Program
(Administrative Draft
and Final Report)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
42
use types to apply it to, and their advantages and disadvantages, taking into account
the organizational capacity and resources of the City and potential partners. The final
recommendations will be based on input from the City and other stakeholders.
TASK D: FORM BASED DEVELOPMENT CODE
San Jacinto has an array of permitted land uses stemming from its use of a con-
ventional Euclidean zoning code. Euclidean zoning tends to simplistically segregate
land uses two-dimensionally and does not satisfactorily address the quality of the
three-dimensional public realm, which is a key factor in creating a built environment
that has a vibrant pedestrian scene.
As part of this optional scope, we plan to employ the techniques of form-based
coding to evaluate San Jacinto’s built form and to make recommendations for the
City’s physical evolution, with the goal being to help the City evolve to the next lev-
el of pedestrian functionality, sophistication and enjoyment. A form-based zoning
approach—employed in place of traditional zoning or as an overlay—will seamless-
ly integrate the physical form of the City with use considerations for the buildings
and will give the City of San Jacinto far greater control over the quality of future
development and redevelopment projects to better ensure a high-quality realm for
pedestrian activity. Deliverables for this scope will include an overall regulating plan,
the identification of up to eight districts or zones for which form-based codes will be
developed and the creation of urban design and public realm guidelines as part of
the form-based code.
There are a number of different formats that a Form Based Development Code could
take. The intent of this task is to assume that the City decided early-on that it would
like to have a form based development code so that the public engagement pro-
gram is designed to support this effort. No additional outreach would be included as
part of this task, rather, the concepts required to be discussed with the community
would occur alongside the regularly programed events outlined in Phase 2. The ex-
act format and structure of the Form Based Development Code approach would be
finalized as part of the project kick-off process.
TASK E: COMMUNITY CHARACTER ELEMENT
We can prepared a stand-alone Community Character Element to incorporate new
urban design, architectural, and landscape design best practices and strategies ap-
plicable to the various conditions and constraints found throughout the City. It will
provide policy guidance to address the relationship between building facades and
the public realm, the form and mass of buildings in relation to one another, and the
scale and types of streets and blocks. The Community Character element will be
focused on providing citywide guidance along with special direction for focus areas
or unique places in San Jacinto, such as its Downtown. This element could be com-
bined with Land Use to streamline the General Plan.
It will provide goals and policies that cover the following topics:
»General architectural guidelines
»Integration/consistent direction on design guidance in Downtown Specific Plan
»Opportunities for placemaking
»Neighborhood enhancement
» Streetscape and façade improvements
» Signage and branding
Deliverables:
»Screencheck Draft,
Administrative Draft,
Public Review, and
Final Form Based
Development Code
Deliverables:
»Administrative,
Public Review, and
Final Community
Character Element
and Implementation
Actions
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
43
TASK F: OTHER SUGGESTED/RECOMMENDED TASKS
Recommended Task: Video Production
The way people learn about General Plans has evolved over time, and new multime-
dia engagement programs are more relevant than ever. A picture, or a video, is often
worth a thousand words. To help engage the public and educate the community on
why the City is updating its General Plan and how it will impact them, we have asked
336 Productions to join our team to prepare two separate videos to summarize various
General Plan work efforts. Each video will be 2-3 minutes in length and feature 3-4
interviews, as well as voice-over, intercut with cinematic b-roll and aerial video of San
Jacinto. Animated text graphics will help to call-out key ideas and facts. Videos will be
formated for web and internal distribution. The video will be shot on professional 4K
cameras that feature the latest advances in photographic technology.
De Novo Planning Group is currently working with the City of Lake Forest on their
General Plan Update. As part of the initial General Plan Update kickoff effort, the City
prepared a video which has been posted online, on local public broadcasts, and can
be shared with stakeholder groups for their own individual viewing. The video is also
on the home page of the GPU project website and is played at the beginning of
community workshops to quickly engage the public and explain the process using
professional narration, graphics, pictures and videos. This has been an extremely suc-
cessful way to educate the public and the video always received positive feedback
from community members of all ages.
There are three stages in the video production process: pre-production, production,
and post-production. Pre-production is about writing the outline and script and plan-
ning production.
During production, 336 will provide all production equipment, manage the set, di-
rect and film the interviewees, film all b-roll and drone footage, and provide creative
direction. The Director will coach and direct all on-screen personalities. 336 plans to
allocate 2.5 consecutive days of production (1 day of interviews, 1 day of traditional
b-roll and half-a-day of drone b-roll).
Once production wraps, post-production begins. 336 will prepare a rough cut, which
will be reviewed and commented on by the City and De Novo Planning Group. The
final cut will feature final passes of all post elements. This cut will also be color correct-
ed, meaning that the Editor will adjust the coloring and exposure of shots to achieve a
look of his liking. The final videos will be exported and delivered to the City.
Deliverables
»Two separate 2-3
minute videos;
uncompressed (full
quality) movie file on a
data disc; compressed
digital file for use on
websites; iPad ready
files; all raw material
»The videos will also
be translated into
Spanish with Spanish
voice-over to replace
the English voice-over
narration, Spanish
subtitles to along with
the interviews and
Spanish on-screen text
for the call-outs.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
44City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
Schedule San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040De Novo Planning GroupTASK DESCRIPTIONPLANSTARTPLANENDDAYSFROM STARTNDJFMAMJ JASONDJFMAMJ JASONDPhase 1 Existing Conditions12/1/2018 3/31/2019120120Contract Award11/20/2018 11/20/201810Task 1.1: Kick-off Meeting and Tour12/1/2018 12/5/201844Task 1.2: Due Diligence and Base Mapping12/1/2018 12/15/20181414Task 1.3: Existing Conditions Report12/1/2018 3/31/2019120120Task 1.4: Cultural/Paleontological Assessment Report12/15/2018 3/1/20197690Task 1.5: Cultural Landscape Study12/15/2018 3/9/20198498Task 1.6: Economic and Market Analysis1/1/2019 2/26/20195687Phase 2 Public Engagement and Visioning12/1/2018 6/1/2020548548Task 2.1: Community Engagement Plan12/1/2018 12/21/20182020Task 2.2: Project Identity12/1/2018 12/31/20183030Task 2.3: Workshops, Pop-ups, and Open House2/1/2019 3/25/2020418480Visioning Workshops2/1/2019 3/15/201942104Pop-up Events2/1/2019 3/15/201942104Open House3/25/2020 3/25/20201480Task 2.4: Online Survey Tool2/1/2019 3/25/2020418480Task 2.5: Focus Group Meetings3/1/2019 3/31/201930120Task 2.6: Stakeholder Interviews and Other Briefings1/1/2019 6/1/2019151182Task 2.7: Website and Digital Engagement12/1/2018 6/1/2020548548Task 2.8: Education Materials and Announcements1/1/2019 6/1/2020517548Task 2.9: Vision Plan Document3/1/2019 3/31/201930120Phase 3 Land Use Alternatives3/31/2019 8/28/2019150270Task 3.1: Land Use Alternatives Report3/31/2019 6/29/201990210Task 3.2: Preferred Land Use Plan Development and Analysis6/29/2019 8/28/201960270Task 3.3: Fiscal Analysis7/29/2019 8/18/201920260Phase 4 General Plan8/28/2019 6/23/2020300570Task 4.1: General Plan Outline and Format8/28/2019 9/27/201930300Task 4.2: Administrative Draft General Plan8/28/2019 12/26/2019 120390Task 4.3: Public Hearing Draft General Plan 12/26/2019 3/25/202090480Task 4.4: Final General Plan 4/24/2020 6/23/202060570Task 4.5: Implementation Plan2/24/2020 3/25/202030480Phase 5 Zoning Update/GP Conformance12/26/2019 5/24/2020150540Task 5.1: Internal Review and Staff Coordination12/26/2019 1/25/202030420Task 5.2: Zoning Map Revisions1/25/2020 2/24/202030450Task 5.3: Administrative Draft Zoning Ordinance2/24/2020 4/24/202060510Task 5.4: Zoning Ordinance Finalization4/24/2020 5/24/202030540Phase 6 Climate Action Plan1/1/2019 7/29/2019209240Task 6.1: Develop a Baseline GHG Emissions Inventory1/1/2019 3/31/201989120Task 6.2 Establish Emissions Reduction Target3/31/2019 4/30/201930150Task 6.3: Develop a Climate Action Plan4/30/2019 7/29/201990240Phase 7 Environmental Clearance8/28/2019 6/23/2020300570Task 7.1: EIR Kick-off and Notice of Preparation/Initial Study8/28/2019 9/27/201930300Task 7.2: Native American Consultation9/27/2019 1/20/2020115415Task 7.3: Draft Environmental Impact Report9/27/2019 4/24/2020210510Task 7.4: Final Environmental Impact Report4/24/2020 6/23/202060570Phase 8 Meetings, Hearings, and Management12/1/2018 6/30/2020577577Task 8.1: Study Sessions and Public Hearings3/31/2019 6/30/2020457577Study Session #13/31/2019 3/31/20191120Study Session #26/29/2019 6/29/20191210Public Hearings5/1/2020 6/30/202060577Task 8.2: Meetings with City Staff12/1/2018 6/23/2020570570Task 8.3: Project Administration12/1/2018 6/23/2020570570Optional TasksA: Housing Element Update8/28/2019 6/23/2020300570B: Initial Study Checklist7/1/2020 7/31/202030608C: Economic Development Incentives Program7/1/2020 8/30/202060638D: Form Based Development Code12/26/2019 5/24/2020150540E: Community Character Element8/28/2019 9/27/201930300F: Other/Video Production12/1/2018 1/31/20196161201820192020Beyond Grant Deliverable DeadlineAdoption of Plan by City Council 4.1.b
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
45City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
ASSUMPTIONS
Below are the assumptions made by De Novo Planning Group and its team members in preparation of the proposal.
General Considerations
»The team will receive a Notice to Proceed by December 1, 2018
»We have reviewed the City's insurance requirements and confirm that we carry the appropriate coverage;
the City of San Jacinto will be listed as an additional insurance upon contract execution
»Model Professional Services Agreement: We request that Item G(2) – Contractual Liability Exclusion (Page 7)
be removed
»City Staff will review Administrative Draft documents within two weeks and provide the consultant with a
consolidated set of comments
Phase 1: Existing Conditions
»Project kick-off meeting and bus tour will be completed within the first two weeks of December 2018
»City Staff will help facilitate the bus tour by identifying places that the team should visit while on the tour
Phase 2: Public Outreach
»The consultant team will prepare all outreach material and distribute to the extent feasible and outlined
in our scope of work and the City will be responsible for additional local distribution, including material
posting in local locations, at City Hall, and via the City's existing social media and electronic platforms
»City will secure locations for the public workshops, focus group sessions, and open house, including tables/
chairs and other necessary equipment and may be asked to participate in meeting facilitation
»Stakeholder meetings/interviews occur in conjunction with existing organization meetings where possible
Phase 3: Land Use Alternatives
»Any changes to the assumptions after development and review of the final statistical summary associated
with the Preferred Land Use Plan, and any changes to the Proposed Land Use Plan, after the City authorizes
its study through the EIR NOP may require changes in scope, budget, and schedule
Phase 4: General Plan Update
»The scope is limited to the laws and requirements in place as of October 2018
Phase 5: Zoning Ordinance Update/GP Consistency
»The City's existing Cannabis ordinance will be reviewed as described in the scope of work, but wholesale
changes to the Cannabis ordinance are not expected; minor modifications are anticipated, including
potential land use changes as a result of the review.
Phase 6: Climate Action Plan
»The baseline inventory prepared for the WRCOG Subregional CAP will be available for use by the City
»The City of San Jacinto will join and maintain a membership with ICLEI for the duration of the project
Phase 7: Environmental Impact Report
»Kittelson & Associates will provide recommendations for the development of CEQA thresholds for VMT.
Upon the City's request, the team can provide a scope and budget to prepare traffic impact analysis
guidelines and thresholds for review and adoption by the City, including testing of the guidelines for sample
projects, examples for the City to compare new projects to, and screening of low VMT areas and mapping
Phase 8: Project Management
»Monthly in-person meetings with the De Novo Project Manager are included, however, at the City's
discretion some meetings may be conducted via web conference or phone conference
»The core work program will conclude in June 2020; should the project extend beyond this schedule,
additional budget may be necessary
Optional Tasks
»The City’s RHNA is not currently known and may substantively influence the land use analysis, public input,
and overall schedule. The scope of work, budget, and schedule assumes that a draft RHNA will be available
by mid-2019 for use in the GPU.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
46
De Novo Planning Group is a land use and environmental planning firm
specializing in community planning, environmental studies, design, and
development services. For the past 10 years, De Novo Planning Group has
successfully operated in the Sacramento, Greater Bay Area, Central Valley,
Tahoe Basin, and northern California regions, and in 2017, opened an office
in Orange County—led by Principal Planner Amanda Tropiano—to serve
southern California clients. The firm’s principal-level staff have successfully
completed over 300 projects consisting of comprehensive general plans,
specific plans, housing elements, environmental impact reports, negative
declarations, initial studies, NEPA analyses, climate action plans, biological
assessments, wetland delineations, and development projects through-
out California. De Novo Planning Group incorporated in July 2008 and has
full-service offices in northern and southern California.
OUR MISSION
Our mission is to provide municipal and private sector clients with world-
class professional services, through principal-level attention to every project.
We pride ourselves on our ability to work with clients to balance their eco-
nomic, social, environmental, legal, and political goals. Our services result in
an integrated planning and environmental solution for every project that is
technically sound, cost effective and delivered within the client's schedule.
OUR PHILOSOPHY
Our philosophy is to proactively plan and design projects in such a way
that public and environmental concerns are addressed and accommodat-
ed early in the process. We strongly believe in the use of local knowledge
for developing sensible and cost-effective solutions to local concerns. Our
solutions integrate local knowledge with the best available resources to
achieve recognized national and international standards for planning and
environmental management, to achieve a balance in local economic, so-
cial, and environmental goals. De Novo Planning Group is dedicated to
fostering a partnership with each agency we serve, through listening to
the community and stakeholders and reflecting the ideas and concerns
we hear in the approach developed for each project.
OUR TEAM
The San Jacinto General Plan Update work program will be led out of our
southern California office located in the City of Tustin. De Novo is a Califor-
nia S-Corporation and has 12 full-time staff, including three Principals, one
Principal Planner, and a team of technical associates. We provide personal
service to all of our clients and are committed to exceeding your expecta-
tions on all components of the work plan.
De Novo Planning Group
A Land Use Planning, Design, and Environmental Firm
FIRM PROFILE
OUR SERVICE AREAS
Community Planning
»General Plans
»Housing Elements
»Specific Plans
»Zoning Codes
»Public Facilitation
»Grant Writing
»Project Management
»Application Processing
»Project Review/Peer Review
Environmental Studies
»CEQA Compliance
»NEPA Compliance
»Biological Studies
»Agricultural Studies
»Air Quality Studies
»Climate Action Plans
»Sustainability Planning
»Mitigation Monitoring
»Permitting
Design
»Land Use Plans
»Subdivision Layouts
»Site Planning
»Design Guidelines
Development
»Feasibility Studies
»Due Diligence Packages
»Competition Analyses
»Cost Estimate
De Novo Planning Group
180 E Main Street Suite 108
Tustin, CA 92780
Contact: Amanda Tropiano
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
47
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. has provided comprehen-
sive transportation engineering, planning, and research
services to government and private organizations since
1985. With a staff of over 220 people working in 24 offic-
es nationwide (including four offices in California, plus
offices in Alaska, Arizona, Florida, Idaho, Maryland, Mas-
sachusetts, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Oregon,
Virginia, and Washington, D.C.), we are able to address
our clients’ needs with local experience and national
expertise. Our Southern California regional office was
established in 2014 in the City of Orange and serves
clients throughout Los Angeles and Orange Counties.
Kittelson is united by collective expertise, local and
national experts who offer decades of progressive re-
search, technological innovation, and a diverse portfo-
lio of industry-leading work. We recognize that healthy,
sustainable societies depend on efficient, active, and
safe multi-modal transportation that is cost-effective
to manage, operate, enhance, and use.
KAI’s staff brings a demonstrated understanding of
transportation and circulation requirements, travel de-
mand modeling, and regional knowledge developed
through more than 30 years of project experience in
California including on recent general plans and specific
plans in both Northern and Southern California. The firm
provides support for all stages of planning and environ-
mental analysis, from site analysis through approval and
construction. KAI’s staff is particularly knowledgeable
about California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance,
and the recent changes to the CEQA-required transpor-
tation analyses. Our staff approaches each project by
building an understanding of client and project needs
and jurisdiction requirements, tailoring work to assist
clients in successfully fulfilling environmental require-
ments in an efficient and cost-effective manner.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) is a land eco-
nomics consulting firm experienced in the full spec-
trum of services related to real estate development, the
financing of public infrastructure and government ser-
vices, land use planning, and government organization.
EPS was founded on the principle that real estate devel-
opment and land use-related public policy should be
built on realistic assessment of market forces and eco-
nomic trends, feasible implementation measures, and
recognition of public policy objectives, including provi-
sions for required public facilities and services.
Since 1983 EPS has provided consulting services to hun-
dreds of public- and private-sector clients in California
and throughout the United States. Clients include cities,
counties, special districts, multi-jurisdictional authorities,
property owners, developers, financial institutions, and
land use attorneys. The firm excels in preparing concise
analyses that disclose risks and impacts, support deci-
sion making, and provide solutions to real estate devel-
opment and land use-related problems.
EPS, in association with allied planning, civil engineering,
transportation, and environmental firms, has been in-
volved with the development of numerous General Plans.
The firm's integrated approach to land use, transporta-
tion, market, fiscal, and financial issues results in plans
that effectively and efficiently guide future development.
EPS evaluates market support for various land uses to de-
termine key product characteristics, the prices/rents that
can be obtained, and market absorption rates. This infor-
mation is used for programming the mix of land uses in
the plan and for providing the inputs required for finan-
cial feasibility analyses and development of a financing
plan for the public facilities needed to serve the plan.
EPS’s fiscal impact models estimate the costs of govern-
ment services required by new development and the
offsetting revenues that the development will generate.
A brief summary of our past experience preparing Gen-
eral Plan-level analysis includes GPUs for the jurisdictions
of El Dorado, San Joaquin, and Sonoma and the cities of
San Jose, Visalia, Napa, Lake Forest, La Verne, Sausalito,
Mountain View, San Clemente, and Sacramento.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
48
Kearns & West, Inc. is a team of professionals with ex-
pertise in community engagement, public involve-
ment, and stakeholder facilitation. Established in 1984,
the firm primarily supports participatory processes
conducted by local, state, and federal governmen-
tal agencies. We work in a variety of sectors including
community and regional planning, resiliency and haz-
ard mitigation, transportation, natural resources, ener-
gy, and environmental sustainability and remediation.
Dedicated to engaging the full cross-section of com-
munity perspectives, they produce meaningful results
by enlisting community voices in advancing critical pol-
icy goals. They are a small- and women-owned certi-
fied business, with 40 staff in Riverside, San Diego, Los
Angeles, San Francisco, and Sacramento, California as
well as Washington D.C. and Portland, Oregon.
Their staff are committed to asking community mem-
bers what information they want and need, without
making assumptions, especially on projects that have
real health, safety, and economic implications. They are
also committed to sharing knowledge, building capaci-
ty for involvement in public process, and using engage-
ment techniques that are creative and inclusionary,
and feel comfortable and safe. Their approach lever-
ages experience from projects like community plan-
ning in Riverside’s Northside neighborhood and City of
Mission Viejo town center, community engagement on
a controversial infrastructure project in semi-rural San
Diego County, engagement of migrant communities
in Orange County and Ventura County, and education
around important air quality and greenhouse gas emis-
sions issues in Western Riverside County. Their work
demonstrates our success with engaging a diverse set
of both urban and rural communities, especially with
communities that are typically underrepresented in the
public input process.
Importantly, Kearns & West is committed to serving,
and being part of, the Inland Empire. They have an of-
fice in downtown Riverside, and participate in profes-
sional and volunteer organizations. Their staff’s previous
employment with Western Riverside Council of Govern-
ments, and their firm’s current service on multiple WR-
COG projects, gives them important insight into both
regional and local city goals, opportunities, challenges,
and needs.
Joan Isaacson and Jenna Tourje, both assigned to the
San Jacinto General Plan Update, have substantial ex-
perience conducting public involvement for general
plan updates and other kinds of citywide plans, includ-
ing projects with involving mixes of advisory groups,
workshops, stakeholder interviews, surveys, popup out-
reach, and topical forums. Joan has been involved in
more than 20 general plan and large scale community
plan updates across Southern California. Jenna recently
served as project manager for the County of San Ber-
nardino Community Plans Continuum process, provid-
ing leadership on a project that created community
plans for 26 unincorporated communities in San Ber-
nardino County.
For the San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040, their
work will primarily be completed from their Riverside
office, with support from staff in their San Diego office.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
49
MD Acoustics, LLC provides acoustical consulting ser-
vices for all facets of noise/vibration engineering, audio
control and air quality and greenhouse gas evaluations.
Located in Phoenix, AZ and Simi Valley, CA our clients
range from the aerospace industry to municipalities
to private land developers. MD has completed numer-
ous acoustical engineering assessments and designs
throughout the California and western U.S. MD was
founded in 2012 by Mike Dickerson. MD incorporates
engineering expertise and professionalism with inno-
vative problem solving. The result is an acoustical engi-
neering firm that provides accurate, timely and cost-ef-
fective solutions.
This innovative approach allows us to provide a wide ar-
ray of services to our clients, which include: aerospace
engineering firms, private developers, local and regional
municipalities and other agencies. Each client receives
what MD Acoustics is known for...on time, on target, on
budget professional service.
Our Mission
MD Acoustics believes that most issues related to acous-
tical design engineering and air quality consulting can
be discovered and mitigated through proper assessment
and design techniques. MD has a threefold mission:
1. Convey to every client that they are important.
2. Create a better work environment through teamwork,
honesty and thoroughness on assessments.
3. Be a proactive partner.
The Right Personnel for the Job
MD Acoustics has the ability to assess a wide span of
air/noise/vibration issues. MD Acoustics personnel and
partners are recognized leaders in the field of acoustics
and air quality/greenhouse gas impact assessments.
The combination of this experience and expertise en-
ables program assignments and technical studies to be
successfully completed to the satisfaction of our clientele.
Quality Work Attracts Quality Clients
Perhaps the best measure of a firm’s capabilities is the
quality of the clientele it attracts. MD Acoustics’ client
list ranges from private developers to regional/local mu-
nicipalities to oil/gas to aerospace engineering firms.
Duke Cultural Resources Management (Duke CRM) pro-
vides private and public clients with the highest quality
archaeological, historical, and paleontological consulting
services. At Duke CRM we balance the importance of pre-
serving significant historical, archaeological, and scientific
resources with the needs of a growing and changing hu-
man environment. To do this we approach each project
with sound science combined with regulatory strategy to
seek development solutions. DUKE CRM staff are experts
in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and the Na-
tional Historic Preservation Act (NHPA, Section 106).
Duke CRM staff has vast experience on several thousands
of projects working with many federal and state agen-
cies, including: Caltrans, FHWA, SHPO, ACOE, FRA, CPUC,
CEC, BLM, USFS, ACHP, DOD, FCC, DWR, and SWRCB, to
name a few. In addition, we regularly work for local agen-
cies. Our services include:
»archaeological and paleontological surveys, test
excavations, data recovery, and monitoring
» Native American consultation (SB 18/AB 52)
» historic resource evaluations
» historic resource surveys
» National and California Register nominations
» HABS/HAER documentation
Duke CRM is a Limited Liability Company established in
2011 by Curt Duke, President and Principal Archaeologist.
Our main office is located in Irvine, California. We also
have a branch office located in San Bernardino, Califor-
nia. Work for this project will be conducted out of both
offices. In addition, we have staff that live and work in all
areas of southern California.
Duke CRM has a broad understanding of cultural and
paleontological resources in Riverside County and spe-
cifically in the San Jacinto area. We have teamed with
JM Research and Consulting (JMRC) to provide historic
resources services and EnviroPros to provide ethnograph-
ic services. The EnviroPros team will be led by Dr. Mitch
Marken, who recently published “The History of Soboba”
which is a 200 plus page volume summarizing and syn-
thesizing past ethnographic and archeological work in
the San Jacinto, Riverside County area.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
50
336 Productions is an award-winning, full service video
production company that focuses on creating excep-
tional experiences – from the client collaborating with
336 during pre-production to the viewer’s experience
watching the finished product. 336 Productions’ goal
is to create positive, engaging, and compelling experi-
ences.
For 9 years, 336 has offered services in pre-production,
production, and post-production. They take projects
from conception to completion, using the most modern
workflows, newest equipment, and time-tested tech-
niques. They are artists and business people who have a
great appreciation for the balance that art and business
have in their industry.
Their specialty is to produce client branded, live-ac-
tion and motion-graphic videos. Their clients include
small start-ups and Fortune 500 companies. Some of
the types of videos they produce include: commercials,
explainers, training videos, product demos, web videos,
and sales videos. Whether the content is produced for
TV, the web, DVD or Blu-Ray, 336 understands and has
experience with each distribution channel.
They have won Telly, W3, Pixie, Davey, and Communica-
tor Awards in the categories of Corporate Image, Cor-
porate Video, Web Marketing, Branded Content, On-
line Video, Motion Graphics, Opening Title Sequence,
Non-Broadcast Productions, and Film Trailer.
336‘s office is located in Costa Mesa, California.
Our Mission
To make business and brand videos that make people
THINK, FEEL, and ACT.
Our Beliefs
We believe our clients deserve to be treated with re-
spect, responsiveness, and honesty...no matter the size
of their business, or size of their budget. We believe
that’s what makes us different from our competition is
the way we approach the process and treat our clients.
Our goal is to provide the best customer service, the
best experience, and of course, the best videos.
Unique to SWA Group is the strong, continuous connec-
tion between planning and design.
Our practice is dedicated to dealing with large social,
economic and environmental issues with equal sensitiv-
ity to the final outcome as we apply to our project-work.
Our planning (deciding what should occur on the land)
and our design (deciding what shape and character that
should be) constitute a seamless process. Our work is to
create place and community with inspiration.
Some of our most successful works do not seem con-
sciously “designed.” However, we are not completely sat-
isfied until our work evokes feelings that transcend the
creation of place and community - even though these
are significant achievements in themselves. We constant-
ly search for a special place, a unique community, one
that reflects the hand of the designer and stimulates a
fresh response.
Our practice is a constant search for a better approach,
or more interesting and informed response, to the wide
array of urban and regional challenges brought to us by
our clients who may be developers, corporations, cities
or universities. Our collaborative approach extends to
our clients with whom we work and to architect col-
leagues with whom we explore new prototypes and new
attitudes toward the man-made world. We appreciate
working with people who share our goals and who have
equally strong points of view. Our stake lies not only with
the intricacy or complexity of designing and building a
place, but also in discovering the intrinsic qualities of that
place. Everything aims toward that accomplishment.
For over 50 years, SWA Group has been recognized as
design leaders in the fields of landscape architecture,
planning and urban design. We have received over 800
awards and have worked in 47 states and more than
60 countries. Our principals are among the industry’s
most talented and experienced designers and planners.
Emerging in 1959 as the West Coast office of Sasaki, Walk-
er and Associates, the firm first assumed the SWA Group
name in 1975 and currently has 231 employees. SWA is
an equal opportunity employer. Work will be led by Drew
Watkins out of the firm's Orange County office located at
570 Glenneyre St, Laguna Beach, CA 92651.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
51
Amanda Tropiano
Project Manager | Principal Planner
Josh Smith, AICP, LEED AP
Associate
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
Community Development Department
EPS
Economics
Jason Moody
Principal
Julie Cooper
Senior Associate
Subconsultant Team
Ben Ritchie
Principal-in-Charge | Principal
Elise Carroll
Associate
Beth Thompson
Housing Element Manager | Principal
Saara Chaudry
Assistant
De Novo Planning Group
Steve McMurtry
CEQA Advisor | Principal
Megan Thorne, LEED AP
Senior Planner + Designer
Will Crenshaw
Associate
MD Acoustics
Noise
Mike Dickerson Jr., INCE
Principal
Claire Pincock
Acoustical Consultant
Kearns & West
Public Outreach
Joan Issacson
Senior Facilitator
Taylor York
Senior Associate
Kittelson
Traffic/Circulation
Tim Erney, AICP, PE
Senior Principal Planner
Damien Stefanakis
Principal Planner
Duke CRM
Cultural Resources
Curt Duke, MA, RPA
Principal Archaeologist
Mitch Marken, Ph.D.
Project Ethnographer
SWA Group
Form Based Code (OPT)
Sean O'Malley
Managing Principal
Andrew Watkins
Principal
336 Productions
Video Production (OPT)
Marlowe Stone
Owner
Josh Stone
Owner
Jenna Tourje
Director
Miao Gao
Engineering Associate
Melina Smith-Castro
Project Coordinator
Dhaval Barbhaya, AICP
Associate Principal
Daniel Dobson
Associate
Jennifer Mermilliod, MA
Project Historian
KEY PERSONNEL
De Novo and our team members bring to the table key personnel with deep experience not only in General Plan
Updates, but also the full range of technical studies and requested optional tasks. To assist with the City's easy
review of key qualifications, a short biography for each staff member follows the organizational chart. For more de-
tailed information regarding education and experience, please see full resumes included in Appendix A.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
52
Beth Thompson
Principal, De Novo
Ms. Thompson is a Principal with
De Novo with over 20 years of pro-
fessional planning experience. Her
responsibilities include general plan
preparation and management, se-
nior review of environmental doc-
uments, environmental planning,
Housing Element updates, policy
document preparation, and con-
tract planning. She will also be avail-
able as alternate staff in the event
that one of the Co-Managers is not
available for a specific meeting.
Steve McMurtry
Principal, De Novo
Mr. McMurtry is a Principal with De
Novo Planning Group and is responsi-
ble for project management, prepa-
ration of environmental documents,
land use plans, air quality modeling,
biological assessments, LESA model-
ing, regulatory permitting, litigation
support, and expert witness testimo-
ny. He has successfully led multidisci-
plinary teams to complete hundreds
of environmental, land use planning,
and development projects in 32 Cal-
ifornia counties.
Amanda Tropiano
PM/Principal Planner, De Novo
Amanda Tropiano is a principal
planner with De Novo Planning
Group and is responsible for lead-
ing the firm’s Southern California
practice. With over 10 years of pro-
fessional planning experience in
the region, Amanda has successful-
ly managed a wide variety of land
use and environmental planning
projects, including General Plans
for Lake Forest, Westminster and
La Verne, strategic plans for Carson
and Torrance, and specific plans in
Alhambra and Bellflower.
Megan Thorne, LEED AP
Senior Designer, De Novo
Megan has worked on a wide vari-
ety of planning projects for public
and private sector clients, including
numerous specific plans, corridor
plans, general plans, site plans, stra-
tegic plans, sustainability programs,
visioning projects, transit-oriented
development plans, zoning docu-
ments, outreach programs, and 3D
visualizations. Megan possesses the
ability to think creatively and envi-
sion change while keeping projects
grounded with achievable bench-
marks and implementable goals.
Ben Ritchie
Co-PM/Principal, De Novo
Mr. Ritchie is a founding principal at
De Novo Planning Group with over
17 years of experience. Mr. Ritchie’s
expertise includes managing long
range planning documents, com-
pleting complex and controversial
CEQA documents, and facilitating
community outreach and public
communications efforts for the firm.
Mr. Ritchie is very adept at leading
and facilitating the public outreach,
visioning, and consensus building
process required for a successful
long-range policy plan.
Martti Eckert, AICP
Senior Designer, De Novo
Martti provides technical expertise
on urban design, long-range plan-
ning, and visioning projects. He
regularly participates in community
outreach activities and conducts cli-
ent communications and business
development programs. Martti is an
expert in Adobe software, ArcGIS,
AutoCAD, and SketchUp. Proficient
in computer-aided and freehand
drawing techniques, Martti brings
a range of design skills to all of his
projects.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
53
Julie Cooper
Senior Associate, EPS
Julie Cooper joined EPS as a Senior
Associate in 2018, bringing profes-
sional experience in land use, eco-
nomic, and community development
consulting. She has provided strate-
gic planning services for a variety of
public, private, and institutional cli-
ents, including analysis of market and
economic conditions, development
feasibility and fiscal impact model-
ing, and policy recommendations.
She also has extensive experience in
stakeholder and community engage-
ment.
Jason Moody
Principal, EPS
Jason has worked at the firm for
nearly 20 years. He has worked ex-
tensively for a variety of public- and
private-sector clients in the areas of
economic impact analysis, regional
economics and competitiveness,
development feasibility, and fiscal
analysis. Jason has led the firm’s
practice in the area of reuse, revi-
talization, and in-fill development,
focusing on the feasibility of individ-
ual projects as well as entire districts
and corridors. He has participated in
numerous GPUs and SPs.
Josh Smith
Associate, De Novo
Josh is an Associate Planner with
De Novo. He has seven years of ex-
perience and is responsible for the
preparation of CEQA/NEPA docu-
ments, climate change planning for
local governments, and the develop-
ment of air quality and greenhouse
gas technical plans and reports.
Josh has substantial experience
with Climate Action Plans, Energy
Action Plans, and toxic air contami-
nant (TAC) Health Risk Assessments.
Elise Carroll
Associate, De Novo
Elise has worked on a variety of
projects throughout California, in-
cluding large-scale, controversial
development projects, Specific and
Master Plans, and General Plan Up-
dates. Her other skills include air
quality modeling using the Califor-
nia Emissions Estimator Model (Cal-
EEMod), public outreach and facili-
tation, and project organization and
management.
Saara Chaudry
Assistant, De Novo
Saara is an Assistant Planner at De
Novo. Saara has experience working
in environmental planning on CEQA
documentation preparation and has
a background working in local gov-
ernment. She is passionate about
community development and is in-
terested in the relationship between
the built environment and commu-
nity empowerment.
Will Crenshaw
Associate, De Novo
Mr. Crenshaw is an Associate Planner
with De Novo Planning Group, and
is responsible for project support in
the preparation of environmental
documents, and General Plans. His
previous experience includes service
with several nonprofit environmental
organizations, and work in the con-
struction industry. Mr. Crenshaw’s
project support work has included
public outreach, research, environ-
mental document writing, and poli-
cy preparation.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
54
Jenna Tourjé
Director, Kearns & West
Jenna Tourjé is native of Riverside
County and a Director at Kearns &
West with over 10 years of experi-
ence in community engagement,
urban planning, and community
building. As a project manager for
the County of San Bernardino Com-
munity Plans Continuum process,
Jenna’s team has developed com-
munity plans for 26 unincorporat-
ed communities in San Bernardino
County. Jenna is certified by the
International Association of Public
Participation.
Joan Issacson
Senior Facilitator, Kearns & West
Joan is a Vice President and Senior
Facilitator at Kearns & West with over
25 years of experience in communi-
ty engagement, stakeholder facilita-
tion, and urban and environmental
planning. At the core of her work is
a commitment to formulating the
best strategy to ensure successful,
viable project outcomes. She also
has special expertise in conducting
multi-language and multi-cultural
community engagement. For San
Jacinto General Plan Update 2040,
Joan will serve as Project Director,
Taylor York
Senior Associate, Kearns & West
Taylor has over 6 years of experience
in public involvement and outreach
focused in community and regional
planning, including energy, air quali-
ty, transportation, conservation, and
education programs. Taylor leads
the Riverside office, and his experi-
ence includes a key role in the out-
reach component of the Riverside
Northside Specific Plan and Mission
Viejo Heart-of-the-City Vision Plan
projects, and he currently serves as
Co-Coordinator of the Western Riv-
erside County Clean Cities Coalition.
Melina Smith-Castro
Project Coordinator, Kearns & West
Melina Smith-Castro is a Project Co-
ordinator with Kearns & West with a
specialty in the fields of urban plan-
ning and environmental conserva-
tion. Melina has a diverse skill set, and
experience including Spanish-lan-
guage public engagement, outreach
in underrepresented communities,
facilitation, project management,
and issue and policy research. For his
projct, Melina will provide support
on logistics, research, outreach event
planning, community events and
meetings, and materials preparation.
Mike Dickerson Jr., INCE
Principal, MD Acoustics
Mike Dickerson has a passion for the
science of sound and vibration and
has worked professionally in acousti-
cal engineering since 2002. Mr. Dick-
erson’s versatile experience includes
leading and assisting in the design
and review of many facets of acous-
tical engineering projects, including
but not limited to air/noise assess-
ments, ceiling/floor assembly design,
architectural design, acoustical prod-
uct design, vibration analysis and
noise mitigation strategies.
Claire Pincock
Acoustical Consultant, MD Acoustics
Claire Pincock graduated from
Brigham Young University in the
top 5% of her graduating class with
a Bachelor of Science degree in Ap-
plied Physics with an emphasis in
acoustics and a minor in Mathemat-
ics. Prior to her joining MD Acoustics,
she was a research assistant at BYU.
Her research was focused on speech
acoustics, specifically on how speech
radiates from the mouth.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
55
Miao Gao
Engineering Associate, Kittelson
Miao (Mia) has applied her formal ed-
ucation in transportation planning
and her strong analytical skills to the
completion of projects across the U.S.
for numerous transportation agen-
cies. Specific projects include SSARs
for the cities of Hemet and Menifee,
OCTA’s SB 743 analysis, and updates
to/applications of countywide trav-
el models. Mia has conducted trav-
el demand modeling using CUBE,
TRANSCAD, and other programs;
and analyzed traffic operations using
SYNCHRO, VISSIM, and HCS.
Tim Erney, AICP, PTP, CTP
Senior Principal Planner, Kittelson
Tim is a certified transportation
planner with more than 20 years of
experience with planning and en-
gineering projects throughout Cali-
fornia. He has significant experience
coordinating with local and regional
transportation and environmen-
tal agencies in Southern California
and has been leading the firm’s ef-
forts on the evaluation of emerging
technologies, alternative evaluation
metrics, and the impacts of new
mobility services on land use and
circulation networks.
Damian Stefanakis
Principal Planner, Kittelson
Damian has 30 years of experience
in transportation planning and trav-
el demand forecast modeling. He
specializes in the development and
application of travel demand mod-
els for highway and transit projects
using many types of software, in-
cluding EMME, TRANPLAN, UTPS,
MINUTP, and CUBE/TP+/Voyager. He
also has experience with application
of regional MPO models. He also
provides on-call support and mod-
el training to clients in the use of
EMME/2 and CUBE/TP+/ VOYAGER.
Mitch Marken, Ph.D.
Project Ethnographer, Duke/EnviroPros
Dr. Marken has over 28 years of ar-
chaeological, historic, ethnographic
and cultural resources management
experience. He has strong connec-
tions Native American tribes in Cal-
ifornia, and his ethnographic work
was recently recognized by the De-
partment of Interior as a model for
future tribal consultation. In 2018,
Dr. Marken published “The History
of Soboba” which summarizes and
synthesizes past ethnographic and
archeological work in the San Jacinto,
Riverside County area.
Jennifer Mermilliod, MA
Project Historian, Duke/JMRC
Ms. Mermilliod meets the Secretary
of the Interior's Professional Qualifi-
cations Standards as a Historian and
Architectural Historian based on her
M.A. in history/historic preservation
from the University of California, River-
side, and 15 years of professional work
in southern California. She is fluent in
regulatory compliance and proficient
at applying eligibility criteria, analyz-
ing project impacts and developing
successful recommendations for de-
sign and mitigation.
Curt Duke, MA, RPA
Principal Archaeologist, Duke
Mr. Duke meets the Secretary of Inte-
rior’s Professional Qualifications Stan-
dards for Prehistoric and Historical
Archaeology. He has more than 25
years of professional cultural resourc-
es experience. Mr. Duke is a Riverside
County certified archaeologist and a
Registered Professional Archaeologist
(RPA No. 15969). He is well-versed in
Section 106 of the NHPA, NEPA, and
CEQA. He has conducted more than
3,500 cultural resources assessments
for various clients in California, Neva-
da, and Arizona.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
56
Daniel Dobsen
Associate, SWA Group
Dan joined SWA in July 2015 as an ur-
ban and landscape designer. He is in-
terested in how and why cities hedge
against risks through the landscape
and what this will mean for built en-
vironments in the future. He has ex-
perience working on master-planned
communities, multi-family housing,
resorts and theme parks, academic
and corporate campuses, and parks.
Marlowe Stone
Owner, 336 Productions
Josh Stone is Co-Founder and Own-
er of 336 Productions. In this capac-
ity, she oversees project manage-
ment, casting, production, client
relations, resource management,
accounting and invoicing. Marlowe
is a graduate of the Film and Video
Production program at California
State University Long Beach.
Josh Stone
Owner, 336 Productions
Josh Stone is Co-Founder and Own-
er of 336 Productions. In this capac-
ity, he oversees directing, editing,
motion-graphics, post sound de-
sign/mixing, and post-production.
Josh is a graduate of the Film and
Video Production program at Cali-
fornia State University Long Beach.
Josh is also a member of the Media
Alliance of Orange County.
Andrew Watkins
Principal, SWA Group
Andrew is an architect, planner and
urban designer. His current work fo-
cuses on large-scale urban design
projects that explore the confluence
of ecology and urbanism. Andrew
has been Project Manager for several
community plans on the west coast
totaling over 3,500 acres and 15,000
dwelling units as well as urban de-
sign and new city planning projects
internationally. Andrew has been with
SWA since 2010 and was made an
Principal in 2017.
Sean O'Malley
Principal, SWA Group
Sean O’Malley has over 30 years of ex-
perience in all aspects of the profes-
sion—including large-scale planning
and construction. As an urban de-
signer, planner, and landscape archi-
tect, he has implemented a unique
approach to the design of cities,
drawing upon the strength of site and
utilizing natural structures as a frame-
work for development. Sean’s design
interests are rooted in environmental
infrastructure and the integration of
the natural structures of a site with its
development potential.
12 I SWA Qualifications
Education
Master of Architecture and Urban Design,
Washington University, St. Louis
Bachelor of Architecture, Center for
Environmental Planning and Technology
(CEPT), Ahmedabad, India
Registrations
AICP - American Institute of Certified
Planners
LEED Accredited Professional
Professional Affiliations/
Recognition
American Planning Association (APA)
Indian Institute of Architects (IIA)
Awards
2005 ASLA St. Louis Chapter Honor Award
- Emerson Grand Basin and Post Dispatch
Lake in Forest Park, St. Louis
2003 AIA Honor Award - Lafayette Square
Master Plan, St. Louis
1999 AIA Central States Chapter - Pagoda
Circle Master Plan, Forest Park, St. Louis
1998 AIA - Citation for Civic Benefit
“The Transformation and Rebirth of Grand
Basin”, Forest Park, St. Louis
SWA Experience
La via Mixed Use Master Plan, Scottsdale, Arizona
JDM Partners LLC. Master plan and public realm design for a 28 acre development.
Wigwam Resort & Downtown Litchfield Concept Plan, Litchfield
Park, Arizona
JDM Ref Transition. Conceptual master planning for a luxury resort town mixed-use
village.
3Roots Cantera Master Plan, San Diego, California
Lehigh Hanson. A new transit-oriented residential and mixed use community.
Buji River Urban Design Competition, Shenzhen, China
China Urban Planning & Design Institute of Shenzhen. Urban design and public realm
design for a mixed-use waterfront development.
Edenborne Master Plan, Ascension Parish, Louisiana
Edenborne Development Co. Planning, concept architecture and landscape design
for an innovation hub area, including mixed-use, light industrial, and R&D.
gateway Park, Irvine, California
Irvine Company. Landscape design for a 93-acre community park combining space
for sports, trails, and natural ecological park edges.
goraj Residential Development, Ahmadebad, India
Pacifica Companies. Master plan for a 252 acre eco friendly residential community.
heritage grove Community Master Plan, Clovis, California
Heritage Development, Inc. Master planning for a new academic village for the
neighboring community and state colleges.
Koh Kong Coastal Tourism Master Plan, Cambodia
UL Property Co., Ltd. Master planning for a world-class ecological and cultural
tourism resort city, creating districts including airport, residential villages,
entertainment, retreats and ecological preserves.
Mission viejo Civic Center Core vision Plan. City of Mission
viejo, California
Analysis and visioning for mixed use revitalization potential within a busy corridor.
North River Farms Master Plan, San Diego County, California
Integral Partners Funding, LLC. Community organized around agriculture and open
space tying neighborhoods to land and the food it produces.
Qiddiyah Master Plan Competition,
Dhaval Barbhaya, AICP, Assoc. Principal
PLANNER | URBAN DESIGN LEADER
Dhaval is an architect, planner and urban designer with over 16 years of
professional experience in leading and designing wide range of both local and
international projects. His work experience includes design and developments
of new towns and communities, mixed-use destinations, transit-oriented
development (TODs), urban revitalization projects, land reclamation projects,
special economic zone, industrial parks, streetscape corridors and greenways,
resorts and hospitality and campus planning. He has worked in the United States,
South America, China, India, Middle-East and many Southeast Asian countries.
Representative Projects:
Dhaval Barbhaya, AICP
Associate Principal, SWA Group
Dhaval is an architect, planner and
urban designer with over 16 years of
international professional experience.
His work experience includes design
and developments of new towns
and communities, formed-based
planning, mixed-use destinations,
transit-oriented development (TODs),
urban revitalization projects, land rec-
lamation projects, special economic
zone, industrial parks, streetscape
corridors and greenways, resorts and
hospitality and campus planning.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
57
REFERENCES
We have assembled a team of dedicated professionals and technical experts to assist the City of San Jacinto with
the important task of updating its General Plan, preparing the Environmental Impact Report, and completing other
related tasks including a stand-alone Climate Action Plan and focused Zoning Ordinance Update. Our team has
real-world experience assisting communities similar to San Jacinto with this type of work. We've worked with cities
and counties throughout California to craft General Plans that reflect the community's vision and values and achieve
the City's objectives for economic development, strategic land use planning, and community design and character.
Facilitating a successful process takes experience. The City needs to be able to count on their team to recommend
best practices, use new technologies and creative engagement strategies, and implement the work plan on sched-
ule and on budget. To further describe our team's relevant qualifications, we have included brief project profiles
of key projects in Appendix B, Team Qualifications.
Recent General Plan Experience
Below is a list of our General Plan Update experience over the past three years (2015-2018) with an identification of
our relevant team members.
»City of Lake Forest (DN, EPS, KAI, SWA)
»City of La Verne (DN, EPS, KAI)
»City of Campbell (DN)
»City of Milpitas (DN)
»City of Manteca (DN)
»City of Lathrop (DN)
»City of Sebastopol (DN)
»City of Brentwood (DN)
»City of Westminster (DN)
»City of Fresno (EPS)
»City of Napa (EPS)
»City of San Mateo (EPS)
»City of Sausalito (EPS)
»City of Sacramento (EPS)
»County of San Joaquin (EPS)
»City of Ceres (EPS)
»City of San Leandro (KAI)
De Novo (Prime) References
City of Brentwood General Plan Update and
EIR and PA-1 Specific Plan
Casey McCann, Community Development Director, Brentwood
150 City Park Way, Brentwood, CA 94513 (925) 516-5195
La Verne General Plan Update, EIR, and Active
Transportation Plan
Eric Scherer, AICP, Community Development Director, La Verne
3660 D Street, La Verne, CA 91750 (909) 596-8706
County of Colusa General Plan Update, EIR,
and Comprehensive Zoning Code Update
Stephen Hackney, AICP, Planning Director (Retired) County of
Colusa Planning Department
220 12th St. Colusa, CA 95932
(530) 342-5528
Additional Subconsultant References
City of Turlock General Plan Update (EPS)
Debbie Whitmore, Deputy Director of Development Services &
Planning Manager, City of Turlock
156 S. Broadway, Suite 120, Turlock, CA 95380
(209) 668-5542
Systemic Safety Analysis Report
(SSAR), City of Hemet (Kittelson)
Sudi Shoja, Acting City Engineer / Engineering Director, Hemet
445 E. Florida Ave., Hemet, CA 92543 (951) 765-2362
Public Involvement for Northside Specific Plan,
City of Riverside (Kearns and West)
Dave Murray, Senior Planner, City of Riverside
3900 Main Street, Third Floor, Riverside, CA 92522 (951) 826-5773
San Jacinto Downtown Specific Plan (Duke
Cultural Resource Management)
David Leonard, Contract Planner, City of San Jacinto
1770 Iowa Avenue, Suite 100, Riverside, CA 92507 (951) 782-9868
Baypoint K-12 Preparatory Academy – Noise
Impact Study, San Jacinto (MD Acoustics)
Steve Nelson, Baypoint Preparatory Academy
122 ½ South Kalmia Ave, Escondido, CA 92025 (760) 805.8299
Mission Viejo Core Specific Plan (SWA Group)Larry Longnecker, City of Mission Viejo
200 Civic Center, Mission Viejo, CA 92691 (949) 470-3024
Department of Water and Power Videos, City
of Corona (336 Productions)
Jennifer Talley, Administrative Services, City of Corona
400 S Vicentia Ave, Corona, CA 92882 (951) 736-2321
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
58City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND EIR AND PA-1 SPECIFIC PLAN
City of Brentwood
The De Novo team recently completed a comprehensive update to the City of Brentwood’s General Plan and prepa-
ration of a General Plan EIR. De Novo Principals Beth Thompson and Ben Ritchie served as the project managers
for the Brentwood General Plan and General Plan EIR, and Mr. McMurtry served as Principal Planner. The work effort
began with an extensive public outreach and visioning process and preparation of a detailed Existing Conditions
Report. Other key tasks include an Opportunities and Constraints Report, three Land Use Map Alternatives accom-
panied by a Land Use Map Alternatives Report, and opportunities for property owners to submit parcel change
requests. Our team worked closely with the City’s General Plan Working Group to complete comprehensive policy
sets for all General Plan topics.
The updated General Plan provides extensive opportunities for economic development, maintains strict fiscal sus-
tainability, enhances the preservation of natural resources in and around the City, and ensures continued quali-
ty in the built environment under increasing growth pressure. Our team worked closely with our subconsultants
throughout all stages of this project. The General Plan was successfully adopted and the EIR was certified in July
2014. The Brentwood General Plan Update Website can be viewed at: brentwood.generalplan.org/ .
The City has reengaged De Novo Planning Group to prepare a Specific Plan for Priority Area 1 (PA-1). PA-1 is a 373-
acre project site located in the northwest corner of Brentwood, and is a projected focal point for jobs and mixed-use
development centered around a future transit station.
Date Range: 2012-Ongoingn
Key Considerations
»Open space preservation
»Agricultural uses
»Regional transportation
»General Plan implementation
»Transit planning
»Job creation
»Jobs/housing balance
»Economic development P
RC ShadyWillowLaneS
h
a
d
y
W
illo
w
L
a
n
e
Lone Tree Way
Lone Tree P la z a D rEmpire Avenue
Minnesota Avenue
Apricot Way
Tremont Court
Capital DriveGreat Falls DriveAmber Lane
Mojave Drive
Grant StreetSungroveWayKohl's Dri
v
e
Tamalpais Ave
Old Sand Creek Road Jeffery WayHeidorn Ranch RoadCornell DriveS a n d C r e e k
RC
R-HD
MUPT
R-MD
R-LD
PF
R-MDMUPT P
SCH
R-MD
R-VHD
PD
MUPT
RC
GC
SPF
R-HD
RC
P
P-OS
P
R-LD
Legend
Priority Area 1 Boundary
P - Park
P-OS - Permanent Open Space
GC - General Commercial
RC - Regional Commercial
PD - Planned Development
PF - Public Facility
SPF - Semi-Public Facility
R-LD - Residential-Low Density
R-MD - Residential-Medium Density
R-HD - Residential-High Density
R-VHD - Residential-Very High Density
MUPT - Mixed Use Pedestrian Transit
SCH - School
PRIORITY AREA 1 SPECIFIC PLAN
General Plan Land Use
Designations
Sources: City of Brentwood parcels, 11/9/2016; DMS parcel version 170425;
Brentwood General Plan 2014; OpenStreets. Map date: April 25, 2017.CityofBrentwoodCityofAntiochUV4
Brentwood Station
Lone Tree Plaza
Streets of Brentwood
Aqueduct
Mokelumne Trail
P
P
General
Plan
Designation
Acres
within the
BPA-1
MUPT 256.58
P 5.23
PD 23.07
PF 0.99
R-VHD 8.98
RC 63.24
SPF 16.83
TOTAL 374.92
³0 500250
Feet
1:10,000
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
59City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
LA VERNE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND EIR
City of La Verne
De Novo Planning Group has recently kicked-off the City of La Verne’s General Plan Update and EIR, expected to
be completed in late 2019. The La Verne General Plan Update will be based on a robust and meaningful engage-
ment process consisting of General Plan Advisory Committee meetings, Visioning Workshops, Community-wide
Workshops, a dedicated project website, newsletters, social media advertisements, and surveys. Since the City of La
Verne last updated their General Plan in 1998, there have been significant changes to the community that warrant a
special look as part of this General Plan Update, including extension of the Gold Line to the community, completion
of the I-210 extension, changes to demographics, and land use questions for the City’s Sphere of Influence areas. De
Novo has teamed with Kittelson & Associates, EPS, and Cogstone on this project and the entire team looks forward
to preparing a General Plan grounded in the community’s vision and values. The La Verne General Plan Website can
be viewed at: laverne.generalplan.org.
De Novo Planning Group is currently working with a 15-member General Plan Advisory Committee to develop draft
goals and policies for the General Plan Update. The team is hosting a series of 10 meetings to cover topics important
to the community, including economic development, community health and wellness, land use and urban design,
and mobility. The City is also home to a future Gold Line Station (set to open in 2026) and has recently adopted
a Specific Plan to guide the growth and development of land uses around the Gold Line Station, which is to be
located just outside of Old Town La Verne and the University of La Verne. Working together, these institutions and
agencies envision a vibrant shopping, dining, and living experience in Old Town. The General Plan continues to seek
ways to support this vision while maintaining the character and quality of the City's established neighborhoods in
North La Verne.
Date Range: 2017-Ongoing
Key Considerations
»Historic preservation
»Transit-oriented development
»Corridor planning
»Economic development
»Community health
»Active transportation
»Land use alternatives
»Outreach
»Environmental impacts
Source: U.S. Decennial Census, 2000, 2010, DOF 2016 E-5
Estimates
Source: ACS, 2015; Economic and Planning Systems, 2018.
* The San Gabriel Valley data consists of the cities of: La
Verne, Azusa, Claremont, Covina, Glendora, Montclair,
Age 19 or YoungerAge 65 or Older
Age 35-64 Age 20-34
23%18%
40%18%
YearPopulationAccording to the U.S. Census Bureau, the popula-
tion of La Verne increased by only 1% from 2000
to 2015 compared to a regional and county aver-
age of 5%. According to projections by the South-
ern California Association of Governments (SCAG),
La Verne will continue to be a slow-growth city.
SCAG’s 2012-2040 projections forecast 3% La Verne
population growth, from 31,800 to 32,900 people.
Since 2000, the age composition of La Verne has
shown an aging trend. Residents of La Verne have
a higher median age than in the region or Coun-
ty. La Verne residents in the senior cohort (age 65
and older) accounted for 18% of the population,
compared with 12% in both the San Gabriel Valley
and County. Combined with the next age cohort
shown, 58% of La Verne residents are 35 and older,
compared with 49% in the San Gabriel Valley and
51% in the County.
Growth in housing supply in La Verne has been
slow with a 4% inventory increase since 2000,
compared with 5% and 6% inventory growth for
he San Gabriel Valley and County respectively. La
Verne’s housing supply is strongly oriented to
single-family homes with 70% of the housing
stock in 2015 either detached or attached sin-
gle-family homes. This is significantly higher than
the County average of 57% single-family share. No-
tably, La Verne’s share of multifamily homes (15%)
is much lower than in the San Gabriel Valley (26%)
and the County (42%), while its proportion of mo-
bile homes (15%) is higher than the San Gabriel
Valley at 5% and the County at 2%.
The rate of home ownership in La Verne is rel-
atively high with owner-occupied homes making
up 69% of the total in 2015, compared with 57% in
the San Gabriel Valley and 43 percent in the Coun-
ty. However, since 2000, the share of owner-oc-
cupied homes declined in all geographies, by 6%
in La Verne, 3% in the San Gabriel Valley, and 2%
in the County.
DEMOGRAPHICS
La Verne, Population Growth, 1960-2010
La Verne, Age Distribution, 2015
La Verne, County of Los Angeles, San Gabriel Valley, Housing Stock Distribution, 2015
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Percentage by Housing Type
La Verne
San Gabriel Valley*
Los Angeles County
02 04 06 08 0 100
Single-Family Detached
Single-Family Attached
Multifamily
Mobile Home
La Verne Community Profile | 7
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
60City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND EIR AND COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE
County of Colusa
De Novo Planning Group completed a full and comprehensive update to the Colusa County General Plan. De Novo
Project Managers Beth Thompson and Ben Ritchie served as the project managers for the Colusa County General
Plan and General Plan EIR, and Mr. McMurtry served as Principal Planner. This work effort included an extensive
public outreach and public participation program, a conservation plan for agriculture, open space, and wildlife, the
development of a county-wide GIS database, policy development in collaboration with a Steering Committee, a
full update to the County’s Housing Element, and preparation of an EIR. Deliverables include a background report,
Issues and Opportunities Report, GIS database, four land use alternatives maps, the General Plan policy document,
Housing Element, and EIR. The updated General Plan provides the County with a 20-30-year growth plan that
balances the demand for increased services, expanded opportunities for local residential and commercial develop-
ment, increased local employment opportunities, and preservation of the rural lifestyle and extensive agricultural
resources of the County.
The General Plan was successfully adopted and the EIR was certified by the County Board of Supervisors in July
2012. The Colusa County General Plan Update Website can be viewed at: www.countyofcolusageneralplan.org
Following the success of the County’s General Plan Update, De Novo was retained to prepare a comprehensive up-
date to the County’s Zoning Code. This effort included an extensive public outreach and community participation
program, including community workshops, 12 meetings with the Zoning Steering Committee, public workshops
with the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors, and adoption hearings. Our efforts resulted in a compre-
hensive overhaul of the County’s Zoning Code, and incorporated numerous user-friendly features, including detailed
tables, graphics, charts, and implementation matrices. We also completed a comprehensive update to the County-
wide Zoning Map and nine community Zoning Maps.
Date Range: 2012-2015
Key Considerations
»Public outreach
»Large geographic
»Different viewpoints
»Rural regulations
»GP/Zoning consistency
»Regional opportunities
»Housing site identification
L A K E C O U N T YLAKE C O U N T Y
G L E N N C O U N T YGLENN C O U N T Y
S U T T E R C O U N T YSUTTER C O U N T Y
B U T T E C O U N T YBUTTE C O U N T Y
§¨¦5
§¨¦5
UV45
UV16
UV20
UV29
UV281
UV53
UV53
UV20
UV45
UV45 Co Rd ZCo Rd DCo Rd 2
Co Rd 68
River RdCR 306Tule Rd
Co Rd 67
Butte Rd
Lurline Ave
Hahn Rd
White Rd
Yolo County Line Rd
Pass Rd
Bear Valley RdWalnut Dr Meridian RdLone Star RdWood Rd4 Mile RdMaxwell Rd
Delevan Rd
Gridley Rd
Norman Rd Co Rd YCranmoreRdColusa Hwy
S a n d C re e kR d
Co Rd 69
Abel Rd
Hillgate Rd
Sites Lodoga
Rd
Wildwood RdHusted RdMoroni Rd
Wyer RdFreshwater Rd
Maxwell Sites Rd Co Rd XxLeesville
Lo
d
oga
R
d Mcdermott RdProgress RdBrim Rd
Grimes Arbuckle RdCortina School Rd Oswald Rd
Co Rd 84Zumwalt RdPennington RdGarmire RdSycamore Slough Rd20 BusL
o
d
ogaSt
onyford
R
d
Poundstone RdBut te S lo u g h R d
E St
Afton Rd
Hageman RdButler RdMartyRd
Johns School RdBiggs Princeton Hwy
Colle
ge
City
R
d
SeiglerCa n yonSchaad RdWisconsin Ave
Mcgarth Rd
Boles Rd
Myers Rd
Central St
Whiskey Creek RdButte Rd
ButteRdDanley RdFor
Pass Rd
SAC
RAMENTO
RIVE
R
SALT CREEK
FUNKSCRE E KHUNTERSCREEK
FRESHWATERCREEK
CA
CHECREEK WILLOW CREEKSPR INGCR EEKSTONECORRAL CREEKLITTLESTONYCREEK
BUTTESLOUGH
SAN D CRE E K
ANG
ELSL
O
U
G
HBUTTECREEKWHISKEYC RE EKINDIANCREEKHYPHUSCREEK SYCAM O R ESLOU GH
SUTTERBYPASS
LURLINE CREEK
NORTHFORKCACHECREEK
CORTINA CREEK
GLENNVALLEYSLOUGH
NORTH B RANCHSA N D C RE E K
SU LLIVANCREEK
SOUTH BR A N C H SAND C R EE K
SQUA W CREEKSTON Y C R E E K
THURSTONLAK EPO
W
ELL
S
LOU
GHLITTLESULLIVANCRE
E
KSANBORNSLOUGH
GL E N N V ALLEY SLO U G H
SUTTERBYPASS
L
OGA
N
CREEKSALTCREEK
SACRAM E N T O R IV ER
Sites
Grimes
Colusa
Lodoga
Delevan
Maxwell
Arbuckle
Williams
Leesville
Stonyford
Princeton
College City
Century Ranch
N
orth
ern Sa
cra
mento Railroa
d
Sacramento Northern RailroadNorthern Sacramento RailroadNorthern Sacramento RailroadEAST PARKRESERVOIR
Sacramento NationalWildlife Refuge
Delevan NationalWildlife Refuge
Colusa NationalWildlife Refuge
Colusa County Zoning Map
Parcel boundary data developed by the Geographical Information Center, California State University, Chico, for DeNovo Planning Group and Colusa County. Other data sources: Colusa County GIS, ESRI StreetMap North America, US Forest Service. Map date: April 21, 2015. v8 (ColusaCo_ZONING_FINAL_24x36_150421)
D e N o v o P l a n n i n g G r o u p
A Land Use Planning, Design, and Environmental FirmHuffmasterRdINDIANVALLEYRESERVOIR
CLEARLAKE SacramentoRiverMe n doc inoMendocino
N at iona l Natio n al
For es t F o res t
Colusa County Airport
UV20
UV20
UV45
F o u ts S p rin g sR d
Tehama-ColusaCanalTehama-ColusaCanal
Glenn-ColusaCanal
Glenn-ColusaCanal
Tehama-ColusaCanal
UV20
UV29
Y O L O C O U N T YYOLO C O U N T Y
LETTSLAKE
UV16
UV45
FUNKSRESERVOIR
Col
usaBasinDrainageCanal/2047F-A: Foothill Agriculture
E-A: Exclusive Agriculture
UC-10: Upland Conservation <20ac
UC-80: Upland Conservation >20 ac
AT-10: Ag Transition <20ac
AT-20: Ag Transition >20ac
RR-2: Rural Residential, 2-acre min. lot
RR-5: Rural Residential, 5-acre min. lot
U-T: Upland Transition
R-1: Residential Single-Family
R-1-6: Residential Single-Family, 6,000-s.f. min. lot
R-1-8: Residential Single-Family, 8,000-s.f. min. lot
R-2: Residential Two-Family
R-3: Residental Multiple Family
R-4: Apartment-Professional
C-1: Neighborhood Commercial
C-2: Community Commercial
C-H: Highway Service Commercial
C-R: Commercial Resort
MU: Mixed Use
M-1: Light Industrial
M-2: Heavy Industrial
RD: Research and Development
R-F: River Frontage
F-M: Flood Management
FM-R: Forest Management and Recreation
F-R: Forest Residential
R-M: Resource Management
G-R: General Recreation
A-V: Airport
P-F: Public Facilities
R-S: Rural Services
T-L: Tribal Lands
State, Federal, and Other Agency Land
Planned Development Overlay
City Boundaries
Spheres of Influence
Sites Plannning Area
Bureau of Reclamation Lands
Wildlife Refuges
County Boundaries
Bodies of Water
Sites Planning AreaSites Plan ning Area
F o u ts S p rin g sR d
.
1 0 1 2 30.5
Miles
1:75,000
Adopted August 26, 2014
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
APPENDIX A: RESUMES
De Novo Planning Group
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-1
EDUCATION
MA, Urban and Regional Planning,
University of California, Irvine
BA, Urban Studies and Planning,
University of California, San Diego
BA, Political Science: Comparative
Politics,
University of California, San Diego
Study Abroad Program,
University of Sussex
ORGANIZATIONS
Urban Land Institute
International Association for Public
Participation
American Planning Association
Congress for New Urbanism
Amanda Tropiano is a principal planner with De Novo Planning Group and is
responsible for leading the firm’s Southern California practice. With over 11 years
of professional planning experience in the region, Amanda has successfully
managed a wide variety of land use and environmental planning projects for public
and private sector clients, including numerous General Plans, specific plans,
corridor plans, strategic plans, sustainability programs, visioning projects, transit-
oriented development plans, zoning documents, outreach programs, and CEQA
projects. Amanda consistently brings to the table her passion, creativity, and
strategic thinking to make sure every project exceeds her client's expectations.
Amanda also supports the land use due diligence efforts of clients throughout
southern California and assists with navigating public agency planning procedures,
reviewing existing regulatory direction, facilitating the entitlement process, and
serving as a liaison between public agencies and private developers.
Amanda Tropiano
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of Lake Forest
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of La Verne
General Plan Update, EIR, and
Climate Action Plan,
City of Campbell
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of Westminster*
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of Menifee*
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of Yucaipa*
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of Clovis*
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of Industry*
Irvine Sustainable Operations
Strategic Plan,
City of Irvine*
SAVI Ranch Land Use and Mobility
Vision Plan,
City of Yorba Linda*
Vision Plan,
City of Carson*
Crafton Hills College
Village Overlay Zone,
City of Yucaipa*
Downtown Fontana Transit-Oriented
Development Study,
City of Fontana*
Harmony Specific Plan, Lewis
Companies,
City of Highland*
Downtown Bellflower Transit-
Oriented Development Specific Plan
City of Bellflower*
Envision Alhambra 2035 Public
Outreach Campaign and Phase I
General Plan Update,
City of Alhambra*
Torrance Strategic Plan Update:
Community Profile and
Environmental Scan,
City of Torrance*
2400 South Fremont
Avenue Specific Plan,
City of Alhambra*
Greentree Ranch Specific Plan
Outreach Program,Foremost
County of Riverside
Springs Specific Plan and EIR,
Sonoma County
888 Diamond Specific Plan,Foremost
City of Diamond Bar
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
* Project was completed by Ms. Tropiano while he was employed at another
planning firm
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-2
EDUCATION
MA, City and Regional Planning,
Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
BA, Political Science and History,
Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
ORGANIZATIONS
American Planning Association
Association of Environmental
Professionals
Mr. Ritchie is a founding principal at De Novo Planning Group with over 17 years
of experience. Mr. Ritchie’s expertise includes managing long range planning
documents, completing complex and controversial CEQA documents, and
facilitating community outreach and public communications efforts for the firm. His
experience includes a variety of land use, transportation, and sustainability projects
throughout California. Mr. Ritchie has extensive knowledge of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has assisted jurisdictions in drafting and
updating their local CEQA implementation guidelines. He served as the
Environmental Coordinator for the City of Rancho Cordova, where he oversaw the
environmental planning division and the preparation of all CEQA documents
prepared by staff and outside consultants. This experience has given him the
knowledge of how local agencies use and implement planning documents, and
specifically general plans, on a day to day basis.
Ben Ritchie
PRINCIPAL
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of Lake Forest
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of La Verne
Sign Code Update,
City of Bellflower
General Plan Update, Housing
Element,and EIR,
City of Brentwood
PA-1 Specific Plan,
City of Brentwood
General Plan and Zoning Code
Update, Housing Element, and EIR,
City of Sebastopol
General Plan Update, Housing
Element and EIR,
City of Cotati
General Plan Update, Housing
Element, Zoning Code Update and
EIR,
Colusa County
General Plan Update EIR and Climate
Action Plan,
City of Foster City
Sustainability Element and Climate
Action Plan EIR,
City of Elk Grove
General Plan Update and EIR,General
Plan Annual Report, Genera Plan
Implementation Plan, Housing
Element Updates, and EIR Addendum
City of Lakeport
General Plan Update, Climate Action
Plan, and EIR,
City of Campbell
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of Milpitas
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of Lakeport
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of Manteca
Seraphina MND,
City of Temecula
LDS Church Initial Study/MND,
City of San Juan Capistrano
The Cannery EIR,
City of Davis
West Area Specific Plan EIR,
City of Salinas
Joerger Ranch Specific Plan EIR,
Town of Truckee
Sterling 5th Street Apartments EIR,
City of Davis
Home2Suites MND,
City of Tracy
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-3
EDUCATION
BS,Environmental and Resource
Science,
University of California, Davis
ORGANIZATIONS
American Planning Association
Beth is a principal with De Novo with over 19 years of professional planning
experience. Her responsibilities include general plan preparation and management,
senior review of environmental documents, environmental planning, Housing
Element updates, policy document preparation, and contract planning. Beth
specializes in community planning as well as CEQA and NEPA compliance. Her
experience includes the preparation and management of numerous General Plan
projects. She also has extensive experience preparing and managing General Plan
EIRs, development EIRs for a range of project types from ski resort master plans
to hospital facilities to subdivisions. Beth is an industry leader in the field of Housing
Elements and General Plans, and she has a proven track record of successfully
completing environmental and planning documentation for complex projects.While
with Laurin Associates (now a subsidiary of Raney Planning and Management) Ms.
Thompson prepared over sixty housing feasibility and market studies for single
family and multifamily residential projects in urban and rural areas throughout the
US, and Palestine). The market and feasibility studies identified market demand
for the proposed housing types, estimated capture rates, identified applicable fees,
and known constraints to development.
Beth Thompson
PRINCIPAL
General Plan Update, Housing
Element,and EIR,
City of Brentwood
General Plan and Zoning Code
Update, Housing Element, and EIR,
City of Sebastopol
General Plan Update, Housing
Element and EIR,
City of Cotati
General Plan Update, Housing
Element, Zoning Code Update and
EIR,
Colusa County
General Plan Update EIR and Climate
Action Plan,
City of Foster City
Sustainability Element and Climate
Action Plan EIR,
City of Elk Grove
General Plan Update and EIR,General
Plan Annual Report, Genera Plan
Implementation Plan, Housing
Element Updates, and EIR Addnedum
City of Lakeport
General Plan Update, Climate Action
Plan, and EIR,
City of Campbell
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of Milpitas
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of Manteca
Housing Element,
City of Half Moon Bay
Housing Element,
City of Escalon
Housing Element,
City of Oakley
Housing Element,
Town of Paradise
Housing Element,
City of Ripon
Housing Element,
City of Winters
Redevelopment Plan EIR,
City of Rancho Cordova
Northstar Highlands Program and
Project EIR,
Placer County
Northstar Village EIR,
Placer County
Resort at Squaw Creek SEIR,
Squaw Valley Public Services District
Moody Flats Mine EIR,
Shasta County
Famoso Ethanol Plant EIR,
Kern County
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-4
EDUCATION
BS, Natural Resources
Management,
Cal Poly San Luis Obispo
ORGANIZATIONS
Licensed Real Estate Broker,
#01380263
Mr. McMurtry is a Principal with De Novo Planning Group and is responsible for
project management, preparation of environmental documents, land use plans, air
quality modeling, biological assessments, LESA modeling, regulatory permitting,
litigation support, and expert witness testimony. He has successfully led
multidisciplinary teams to complete hundreds of environmental, land use planning,
and development projects in 32 California counties. Mr. McMurtry’s experience
includes service in engineering and planning firms, as well as in the building
industry. He has served as the project manager for thirteen RTP EIRs in California
and is known as an expert in transportation environmental planning. His
environmental experience encompasses public outreach/facilitation,
policy/program development, document writing/processing, and permitting. Mr.
McMurtry has extensive experience preparing environmental documents and
obtaining regulatory permits for state and federally funded projects, including
projects within the State Highway System. Because of his expertise, he has been
called on for litigation support and expert witness testimony relative to
environmental and CEQA issues.
Steve McMurtry
PRINCIPAL
Truckee Planned Community 3
(SP3) EIR,
Town of Truckee
Cannery Park Master Plan EIR,
City of Davis
South Lathrop Specific Plan EIR,
City of Lathrop
5175 Vincent Avenue Initial
Study/MND,
City of Irwindale
Seraphina Initial Study/MND,
City of Temecula
LDS Church Initial Study/MND,
City of San Juan Capistrano
Griffin Park Master Plan EIR,
City of Manteca
Whisper Ridge Hotel Resort and Golf
Course Master Plan EIR,
City of Oroville
Silverado Master Plan EIR,
City of Elk Grove
Tra Vigne Master Plan EIR,
City of Stockton
Ventana Specific Plan EIR,
City of Merced
Madera 5-Bridges Specific Plan EIR,
City of Merced
Atwater South Specific Plan EIR,
City of Atwater
Morgan Ranch Specific Plan EIR,
City of Turlock
Family Entertainment Zone Master
Plan EIR,
City of Manteca
Pilot Flying J EIR,
City of Tulare
Pilot Flying J EIR,
City of Lathrop
2015 Placer County RTP EIR,
Placer County Regional Transportation
Planning Agency
2011 San Joaquin County RTP EIR
San Joaquin Council of Governments,
2012 Butte County MTP and SCS
EIR,
Butte County Association of
Governments
2015 Amador County RTP EIR,
Amador County Transportation
Commission
Merced County 2014 RTP EIR,
Merced County Association of
Governments
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-5
EDUCATION
MCP,City Planning,Urban Design
Concentration
University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia
BS,Urban, Rural, and
Environmental Planning,
Brigham Young University,Provo
Research,
Cambridge University (UK),Pembroke
College
ORGANIZATIONS
Urban Land Institute
American Planning Association
U.S. Green Building Council
LEED AP BD+C,
Credential Id # 10433552-AP-BD+C
Megan Thorne is a senior planner and designer with De Novo Planning Group. With
over 6 years of professional planning experience, Megan has worked on a wide
variety of planning projects for public and private sector clients, including numerous
specific plans, corridor plans, general plans, site plans, strategic plans,
sustainability programs, visioning projects, transit-oriented development plans,
zoning documents, outreach programs, and 3D visualizations. Megan possesses
the ability to think creatively and envision change while keeping projects grounded
with achievable benchmarks and implementable policy goals. She excels at
communicating complex information and policy ideas in a compelling and simple
manner. As a designer, Megan has differentiated herself with her hand-drawing
abilities as well as her technical skills. Her technical expertise includes 3D
modeling, graphic design, and web design. She continues to pioneer ways new
technology can improve old processes from community outreach approaches to the
web-publication of planning documents.
Megan Thorne, LEED AP BD+C
SENIOR PLANNER + DESIGNER
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of Lake Forest
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of La Verne
General Plan Update, EIR, and
Climate Action Plan,
City of Campbell
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of Westminster*
General Plan Update and EIR
Temple City*
SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS: Content
Authoring and Web Solution
Southern CA Association of
Governments*
California High Speed Rail: Palmdale
to Burbank Segment
Palmdale, Burbank*
West Carson Transit-Oriented
Development Specific Plan
City of West Carson*
Downtown Bellflower Transit-
Oriented Development Specific Plan
City of Bellflower*
Morena Corridor Specific Plan,
City of San Diego*
De Anza Revitalization Plan
City of San Diego*
Crafton Hills College
Village Overlay Zone,
City of Yucaipa*
Harmony Specific Plan, Lewis
Companies,
City of Highland*
SAVI Ranch Land Use and Mobility
Vision Plan,
City of Yorba Linda*
LA County Parks Needs Assessment,
Los Angeles County*
California State University Dominguez
Hills Visioning & Site Planning
CSU Dominguez Hills*
Springs Specific Plan and EIR,
Sonoma County
888 Diamond Specific Plan,Foremost
City of Diamond Bar
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
* Project was completed by Ms. Knowles while she was employed at another
planning firm
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-6
EDUCATION
M, City and Regional Planning,
Ohio State University
BS, Architecture,
University of Cincinnati
ORGANIZATIONS
American Planning Association
ACCREDITATIONS
American Institute of Certified
Planners,#029070
AWARDS
2015 Merit Award for Best Practices,
APA, Sacramento Valley Section,
Southeast Area Plan, City of Elk Grove
2013 Best Comprehensive Planning
Document for Small Jurisdiction APA,
California Chapter,
Downtown Plan, City of Ione
2013 Outstanding Planning Award –
Best Practices, APA, Central Section,
Kern County Vision Plans, Kern
County
Martti is a Senior Urban Designer with De Novo, where he oversees and provides
technical expertise on urban design and long-range planning projects. Martti leads
visioning, land use, and design-related efforts, participates in community outreach
activities, and conducts client communications and business development
programs. Martti is an expert in Adobe software, ArcGIS, AutoCAD, and SketchUp.
Proficient in computer-aided and freehand drawing techniques, Martti brings a
range of design skills to all of his projects. As a Certified Planner with the American
Planning Association, Martti understands complex planning projects and how to
design custom approaches that best meet the client’s needs while reflecting
contemporary best practices. He also has experience working as a staff planner for
the City of Elk Grove and providing on-call design review services to other
jurisdictions.
Martti Eckert, AICP
SENIOR URBAN DESIGNER + PLANNER
PA-1 Specific Plan,
City of Brentwood
Southeast Policy Area Planning
Document,
City of Elk Grove*
Downtown Specific Plan,
City of Manhattan Beach*
High Speed Rail Station Area Plan,
City of Merced*
Downtown Plan,
City of Ione*
North Downtown Compton Specific
Plan,
City of Compton*
General Plan Update,
City of Campbell
General Plan Update,
City of Lathrop
General Plan Update,
Manteca
General Plan Update,
City of Huntington Beach*
General Plan Update,
City of Elk Grove*
General Plan Update,
City of Chico*
Sustainable Development
Code Update,
City of Patterson*
Zoning Code Update,
City of Palm Desert*
Zoning Code Update,
City of Rancho Cordova*
Zoning Code Update,
City of Lemoore*
Mojave, Old Town Tehachapi, and
Boron Vision Plans,
Kern County*
Southeast Policy Area Architectural
Style Guide,
City of Elk Grove*
Scenic Corridor Design Guidelines,
City of Plymouth*
Community Wayfinding Sign
Standards,
Mono County*
Downtown Pedestrian Improvement
Project,
City of Torrance*
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
* Project was completed by Mr. Eckert while he was employed at another
planning firm
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-7
EDUCATION
BS, Environmental Policy and
Planning,
University of California, Davis
BS, Architecture,
Elise is an Associate Planner with De Novo. She has multiple years of
environmental consulting experience completing both CEQA and NEPA
documentation in the public and private sectors. Elise has worked on a variety of
projects throughout California, including large-scale, controversial development
projects, Specific and Master Plans, and General Plan Updates. Examples include
the Mace Ranch Innovation Center EIR (City of Davis), Eastview Specific Plan and
Annexation EIR (City of Galt), Russell Ranch Project EIR (City of Folsom), and City
of Campbell General Plan Update. Her other skills include air quality modeling
using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), public outreach and
facilitation, and project organization and management.
Elise Carroll
ASSOCIATE
5175 Vincent Avenue MND,
City of Irwindale
South Lathrop SP EIR,
City of Lathrop
Truckee PC-3 SP EIR,
Town of Truckee
Pilot Flying J EIR,
City of Tulare
West Area Specific Plan EIR,
City of Salinas
Oakwood Trails EIR,
City of Manteca
Oakwood Landing EIR,
City of Manteca
Griffin Park Master Plan EIR,
City of Manteca
Calaveras SR 49 Land Use Study,
Calaveras Council of Governments
Sonoma Springs Specific Plan and
EIR,
Sonoma County
Tra Vigne Development Project EIR,
City of Stockton
Sterling Apartments EIR,
City of Davis
Oakwood Landing Project EIR,
City of Manteca
Griffin Park Master Plan Project EIR,
City of Manteca
Milpitas General Plan Update,
City of Milpitas
Campbell General Plan Update,
City of Campbell
Manteca General Plan Update,
City of Manteca
Legacy Trail CEQA and NEPA
Documents,
Town of Truckee
Pilot Flying J EIR,
City of Lathrop
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-8
EDUCATION
MA, City and Regional Planning,
California Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo
BA, Geography,
University of California, Los Angeles
Mr. Crenshaw is an Associate Planner with De Novo Planning Group, and is
responsible for project support in the preparation of environmental documents, and
General Plans. His previous experience includes service with several nonprofit
environmental organizations, and work in the construction industry. Mr. Crenshaw’s
project support work has included public outreach, research, environmental
document writing, and policy preparation. During his academic career, he received
multiple honors including two UCLA scholarship recognition awards “In recognition
of high achievement and outstanding promise,” as well as the 2013 Errett Fisher
Foundation Scholarship.
William Crenshaw
ASSOCIATE
Truckee PC-3 SP EIR,
Town of Truckee
Pilot Flying J EIR,
City of Tulare
Amador County RTP EIR,
Amador County Council of Governments
Placer County RTP EIR,
Placer County Regional Transportation
Planning Agency
Pilot Flying J EIR,
City of Lathrop
Family Entertainment Zone EIR,
City of Manteca
South Lathrop Specific Plan EIR,
City of Lathrop
West Area Specific Plan EIR,
City of Salinas
Oakwood Trails EIR,
City of Manteca
Oakwood Landing EIR,
City of Manteca
Griffin Park Master Plan EIR,
City of Manteca
Sonoma Springs Specific Plan and
EIR,
Sonoma County
Sterling Apartments EIR,
City of Davis
Milpitas General Plan Update,
City of Milpitas,
Campbell General Plan Update,
City of Campbell,
Manteca General Plan Update,
City of Manteca,
Sebastopol General Plan Update,
City of Sebastopol,
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-9
EDUCATION
BS, Environmental Policy Analysis
and Planning,
University of California, Davis
ORGANIZATIONS
Association of Environmental
Professionals
ACREDITATIONS
AICP
LEED AP O+M
Josh is an Associate Planner with De Novo. He has seven years of experience and
is responsible for the preparation of CEQA/NEPA documents, climate change
planning for local governments,and the development of air quality and greenhouse
gas technical plans and reports. He focuses on finding effective ways to mitigate
environmental risks within difficult local government budget and manpower
constraints. Josh has substantial experience with Climate Action Plans, Energy
Action Plans, and toxic air contaminant (TAC) Health Risk Assessments. He served
as the primary technical analyst on the Pleasanton, Oakdale, Hughson, and
Campbell Climate Action Plans, and has been a deputy Project Manager for EIRs
such as the Placer County RTP EIR and Amador County RTP EIR. Josh has
expertise utilizing best-practice standards for developing greenhouse gas (GHG)
inventories and context-specific GHG mitigation measures, as well as developing
custom air pollutant emissions calculators for complex projects.
Josh Smith, AICP, LEED AP
ASSOCIATE
5175 Vincent Avenue MND,
City of Irwindale
South Lathrop SP EIR,
City of Lathrop
Truckee PC-3 SP EIR,
Town of Truckee
Pilot Flying J EIR,
City of Tulare
Amador County RTP EIR,
Amador County Council of Governments
Placer County RTP EIR,
Placer County Regional Transportation
Planning Agency
Pilot Flying J EIR,
City of Lathrop
West Area Specific Plan EIR,
City of Salinas
Oakwood Trails EIR,
City of Manteca
Oakwood Landing EIR,
City of Manteca
Griffin Park Master Plan EIR,
City of Manteca
Legacy Trail CEQA and NEPA
Documents,
Town of Truckee
Sonoma Springs Specific Plan and
EIR,
Sonoma County
Sterling Apartments EIR,
City of Davis
Milpitas General Plan Update,
City of Milpitas
Campbell General Plan Update,
City of Campbell
Manteca General Plan Update,
City of Manteca
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-10
EDUCATION
MA, Urban and Regional Planning,
University of California, Irvine
BA, Political Science: Public Policy,
University of California, San Diego
Saara is an Assistant Planner at De Novo. Having recently received her Master’s
degree in Urban and Regional Planning, she has launched her planning career as
an Assistant Planner in the field. Saara has experience working in environmental
planning on CEQA documentation preparation and has a background working in
local government.She received her Master’s degree from the University of
California Irvine and has a Bachelor’s degree in Political Science from the
University of California San Diego. She is passionate about community
development and is interested in the relationship between the built environment
and community empowerment.
Saara Chaudry
ASSISTANT PLANNER
5175 Vincent Avenue MND,
City of Irwindale
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of Lake Forest
General Plan Update and EIR,
City of La Verne
Neighborhood Plan,
City of Irvine
Signage Code Update,
City of Bellflower
888 Diamond Specific Plan,Foremost
City of Diamond Bar
Westside Costa Mesa Neighborhood Plan
(Practicum)
City of Costa Mesa*
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
* Project was completed by Ms. Chaudry while enrolled as a Graduate Student in Urban and
Regional Planning at the University of California, Irvine.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-11
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. One Kaiser Plaza, Suite 1410 Oakland, CA 94612
The Economics of Land Use 510.841.9190 jmoody@epsys.com www.epsys.com
Jason Moody
Principal
Education
Master of Public Policy,
University of California,
Berkeley, 1995
Bachelor of Arts in
Economics, University of
California, Santa Cruz, 1988
Previous Employment
Budget Analyst for City of San
Francisco (1995)
Business Analyst, Port
Authority of New York/New
Jersey (1994)
Research Analyst, Fisher
Center for Real Estate and
Urban Economics (1993–
1994)
Federal Government
Reporter, States News
Service, Washington, DC
(1989–1992)
Affiliations
San Francisco Planning and
Urban Research Association
International Economic
Development Council
City of Oakland Economic
Advisory Panel
Relevant Publications
“Urban-Suburbia”, Urban
Land,October 2008.
“Transit Joint Development”
with Bruce Appleyard, Urban
Land,August 2007.
“The Town and Gown,”
Economic Development
Journal, Fall 2004.
“Spontaneous Research
Districts,”Association of
University Related Research
Parks conference paper.
“Defense Industry
Conversion, Base Closure,
and the California Economy,”
Fisher Center Working Paper.
ABOUT
A Principal at EPS, Jason has worked at the firm for nearly 20 years. He has
worked extensively for a variety of public-and private-sector clients in the areas
of economic impact analysis, regional economics and competitiveness,
development feasibility, and fiscal analysis. Jason has led the firm’s practice in
the area of reuse, revitalization, and in-fill development, focusing on the
feasibility of individual projects as well as entire districts and corridors.He has
also worked on major planning efforts, participating in numerous General,
Specific, and Precise plans for jurisdictions in California and elsewhere.
SELECTED PROJECT MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE
Lake Forest General Plan Update
Evaluated long-term economic and market conditions as well as development
opportunities and feasibility as part of the General Plan Update for this
prosperous Orange County community.
La Verne General Plan Update
Evaluated long-term economic and market conditions as well as fiscal
considerations relevant to the General Plan Update for this mature and successful
community.
San Clemente General Plan Economic Analysis
EPS evaluated the development potential for a wide range of residential,
commercial, and office/industrial land uses from both a market and land capacity
perspective to inform the San Clemente General Plan Update process.
Fresno General Plan Update
Evaluated and compared the fiscal implications of various General Plan
alternatives, focusing on the differential General Fund costs and revenues of
associated with various public service levels and the location and type of growth.
Turlock General Plan Update
Analyzed demographic and job projections and conducted fiscal impact and
infrastructure financing analyses for the Turlock General Plan.
Visalia General Plan Update
Conducted economic, market, and fiscal analysis as part of a multidisciplinary
team selected for the City of Visalia’s General Plan Update.
Mountain View General Plan Economic and Market Analysis
Evaluated long-term economic and market conditions as well as development
feasibility as part of the General Plan Update for a growth constrained community
in the heart of Silicon Valley.
Palo Alto Comprehensive Plan Update
EPS was retained by the City evaluate the fiscal performance and market factors
affecting various land use scenarios being considered as part of the
Comprehensive Plan Update for a growth constrained community in the heart of
Silicon Valley.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-12
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 949 South Hope Street, Suite 103 Los Angeles, CA 90015
The Economics of Land Use 213.489.3808 jcooper@epsys.com www.epsys.com
Julie Cooper
Senior Associate
Education
Master of Public Policy,
Harris Public Policy at the
University of Chicago, 2014
Bachelor of Arts, International
Studies,University of
Chicago,2007
Previous Employment
Associate,Development
Strategies, Saint Louis, MO
(2014-2018)
Director of Public Relations,
Israel Government Tourist
Office Midwest Region,
Chicago, IL (2008-2012)
ABOUT
Julie Cooper joined EPS as a Senior Associate in 2018, bringing professional
experience in land use, economic, and community development consulting. She
has provided strategic planning services for a variety of public, private, and
institutional clients, including analysis of market and economic conditions,
development feasibility and fiscal impact modeling,and policy recommendations.
She also has extensive experience in stakeholder and community engagement.
Before joining EPS, Julie served as an Associate at Development Strategies, a St.
Louis-based land use and economic development consulting firm; and as Director
of Public Relations for the Israel Ministry of Tourism’s office in Chicago.
SELECTED PROJECT AND PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Quincy Next Strategic Plan
Development Strategies was hired by the city of Quincy, Illinois, to work with city
staff, elected officials, and a committee of engaged citizens on formulating a
citywide strategic plan. The final plan included a wide range of recommended
initiatives for the city to pursue to catalyze population and economic growth over
the next ten to fifteen years. The initiatives focused on opportunities for improving
transportation infrastructure, fostering development on the city’s riverfront and in
its downtown, and supporting existing industry sectors while also cultivating new
and growing ones. As Project Manager, Julie oversaw the firm’s analysis of existing
conditions, engagement with stakeholders, formulation of policy
recommendations, and presentation of findings to the public.
Downtown Blacksburg Strategic Plan
The Town of Blacksburg,a small mountain community in western Virginia, is home
to Virginia Tech, the state’s third-largest university. Recent university growth has
created intense land use supply and cost pressures in town, particularly in the
historic Downtown area. At the same time, local residents are concerned that
allowing greater density of housing and commercial development will negatively
impact the community’s small-town character. Development Strategies was hired
by the town to put together a set of policies and implementation steps that would
balance the forces of market demand and town identity and make Downtown
vibrant and accessible for all. As Project Manager, Julie was involved in all parts of
the project, including market analysis; policy research and formulation; and
engagement with town staff, key stakeholders, and the public.
Downtown Toledo Master Plan
The 22nd Century Committee, a group of business and civic leaders in the city of
Toledo, Ohio, engaged a team of designers and market analysts to produce a
Master Plan to guide and promote future development in the city’s Downtown.
Development Strategies was tasked with analyzing the market potential for
different types of land uses in Downtown, including residential, retail, office and
hospitality. Julie was the primary analyst on the project, responsible for conducting
and writing about market supply and demand analysis for these land uses.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-13
Timothy Erney,AICP, PTP, CTP | P1
TIMOTHY ERNEY, AICP, PTP, CTP
Senior Principal Planner
Tim is a certified transportation planner with more than 20 years of experience with
planning and engineering projects throughout California. His primary focus has been
on managing analyses and documentation for environmental review projects, access
and circulation studies, sustainable transportation practices, TDM measures, parking
evaluations, pedestrian and bicycle reviews, and data collection programs. In
addition, his experience includes detailed technical analyses of local and regional
roadway facilities, including traffic forecasting, modal split analyses, traffic diversion,
and operational analyses. He has experience coordinating with local and regional
transportation and environmental agencies in Southern California and has been
leading the firm’s efforts on the evaluation of emerging technologies, alternative
evaluation metrics, and the impacts of new mobility services on land use and
circulation networks.
CORRIDOR STUDIES
Tim has managed complex alternatives analysis and corridor studies for modes of
travel, including transit, roadways, freeways, and bicyclists/pedestrians. Tim works
closely with jurisdictions to develop robust screening criteria and defensible
methodology for the evaluation of multiple alternatives through qualitative and
quantitative evaluations. Studies are typically supported with detailed metrics and
infographics to clearly inform decision-makers on the pros and cons of each
alternative and the rationale for the advancement of the recommended concepts.
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Tim has served as project principal for active transportation planning projects
throughout Southern California. He has provided direction of the planning, design and
evaluation of active transportation corridors, active transportation plans, data
collection programs, and forecasting. Through these efforts, Tim has promoted the
need for a balanced approach for all user groups and to ensure safe, convenient and
cost-effective mobility options that support the adjacent land uses and urban form.
TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT
For both individual development sites and large-scale neighborhoods, Tim has been
responsible for developing implementable and defensible travel demand
management (TDM) programs. Primarily, these include the evaluation of the best TDM
elements to achieve the goals of the project, supported by data and research
developed on a national basis. In addition to the adoption of standard TDM
measures, such as active transportation facilities and parking management, Tim
routinely works with developers to adjust land use programs to better internalize trips
and to right-size parking to facilitate shared parking opportunities.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS
Tim has led the preparation of stand-alone transportation impact studies and
transportation/circulation sections of EIRs and EISs to support CEQA and NEPA
processes. These projects have included full range of project types, from individual
development projects, to updated citywide plans, to significant infrastructure projects.
For these efforts, Tim has managed the technical analysis for all modes of travel,
including qualitative and quantitative assessments of traffic, transit, pedestrian,
bicyclist, loading, construction, and emergency vehicle conditions. In addition, these
projects have also included the development of specialized trip generation rates and
use of regional travel demand models to project future traffic volumes.
ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE METRICS
Tim has been working to identify and develop alternative metrics to Level of Service
(LOS) in the evaluation of land use and transportation projects; this includes the
identification on how cities and counties need to modify their current programs and
policies to account for these changes. As part of these efforts, Tim has been in
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Boston
University, 1995
Master of City Planning,
University of California
Berkeley, 1997
Master of Science, University
of California Berkeley, 1997
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
22
LICENSES
American Institute of
Certified Planners
Certified Transportation
Planner
Professional Transportation
Planner
AFFILIATIONS
American Planning
Association (APA), Member
Institute of Transportation
Engineers (ITE), Member
PUBLICATIONS
“Technology-Driven Transit
Oriented Development”,
Community Transportation,
Volume 28, Winter 2010
(contributor)
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-14
Timothy Erney,AICP, PTP, CTP | P2
consultation with the state’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and participated in several conferences and panel
discussions on the effects of vehicle-miles traveled calculations and metrics may affect city programs and
transportation analysis guidelines.
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, LAKE FOREST, CA: Managing the evaluation of the build-
out of the City’s land use program, which is including the determination of potential effects to the circulation network
throughout the city. Specialized assessments are being conducted to identify the anticipated effect of emerging
transportation technologies (such as transportation-networking companies and connected/automated vehicles) will
have on the roadway networks, including the potential to reduce citywide vehicle-miles travelled.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, LA VERNE, CA: Leading the assessment of the evaluation
of an update to the General Plan for the City of La Verne. Developing travel demand estimates, using the SCAG travel
demand model, for multiple land use alternatives. Proposing adjustments to the circulation network and parking
regulations to accommodate the future Metro Gold Line Station within the City, plus to include a new Active
Transportation Plan. Helping the City address the proposed SB743 changes to intersection analysis under CEQA.
PCH/2ND PLANNING SUPPORT,LONG BEACH, CA:Provided peer review services for the transportation evaluation of a
220,000 square foot retail/restaurant/entertainment development in Long Beach, CA.Created alternative access plans
to minimize impacts and queues on local streets, including implementation of new signals and truck maneuvers.Led
discussions and prepared materials for Caltrans to address potential effects to Caltrans’s facilities.Created alternative
access plans to minimize impacts and queues on local streets.
ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN, LA VERNE, CA: Project Principal for the development of the first Active Transportation
Plan for the City of La Verne. Identifying existing bicycle and pedestrian travel patterns and conflict points and
conducting outreach to identify key destinations and constraints from the public. Proposing new bicycle routes,
enhanced bicycle facilities, and improvement pedestrian facilities to encourage additional walking and biking
citywide. Coordinating policies and objectives with the ongoing General Plan Amendment.
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (OCTA)SB743 SUPPORT, ORANGE COUNTY, CA: Assisted the Orange
County Transportation Authority (OCTA) in identifying the recommended approach to implement Senate Bill 743 (SB743)
throughout the County. Assessed options for calculating vehicle-miles traveled (VMT) and developed map-based
screening tools to illustrate VMT per capita and per employee for each city and TAZ. Working with OCTA staff to modify
the existing Congestion Management Program and traffic analysis guidelines to incorporate VMT into the analysis
process.
CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL ENVIRONMENT AND ENGINEERING SERVICE FOR PALMDALE TO BURBANK SECTION, LOS
ANGELES COUNTY, CA: Project manager for the technical transportation analysis of the segment of the planning
California High-Speed Rail system from Palmdale to Burbank. Assessing the effect of construction and operation of the
train on over 200 analysis locations, including the identification of effects to traffic, circulation, parking, and other
modes. In addition, developing the circulation and access plans for the Palmdale and Burbank station areas.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND EIR, LA MESA, CA: Lead the transportation evaluation of the proposed update to the
General Plan for the City of La Mesa. Developed existing conditions for all modes of travel and estimated future
roadway volumes using the SANDAG model. Identified transportation network impacts and proposed mitigation
measures to address intersection and roadway conditions.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-15
Damian Stefanakis | P1
DAMIAN STEFANAKIS
Principal Planner
Damian has 30 years of experience in transportation planning and travel demand
forecast modeling. He specializes in the development and application of travel
demand models for highway and transit projects using many types of software,
including EMME, TRANPLAN, UTPS, MINUTP, and CUBE/TP+/Voyager. He also has
experience with application of regional MPO models in California, Houston, Cleveland,
and Florida. Damian has significant experience developing the CCAG-VTA and
Alameda CMA Countywide Models for regional transit and highway studies. He also
provides on-call support and model training to clients in the use of EMME/2 and
CUBE/TP+/ VOYAGER.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDIES/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS (EIR)
Damian has managed transportation impact studies and EIRs that involved the
analysis of traffic operations, on-site access and circulation, parking, and impacts on
alternative modes. Such projects include transit-oriented developments, large scale
mixed use projects, general plans, station area plans and traffic impact studies. Key
projects include:
•General Plans: Pacifica, Belmont, East Palo Alto, Hayward, San Leandro,
Livermore, San Carlos
•Housing Elements: Marin County Housing Element
•K-12 Schools: Hayward High School Access Study, Cherryland Elementary School
Relocation and Expansion, Harder Elementary School Expansion
•Large-scale Mixed-Use and Specific Plans: San Leandro Shoreline EIR, Alameda
Point EIR, Kaiser San Leandro Mixed Use EIR, El Charro Specific Plan EIR (Livermore),
South Hayward BART Specific Plan EIR, Mission Boulevard Specific Plan EIR, West
Oakland Specific Plan, San Leandro Shoreline Specific Plan, Fairview Specific Plan
•Transit-Oriented Developments: Lake Merritt Station Area Plan, San Leandro TOD,
Livermore Isabel Station Area Plan
ON-CALL MODELING AND TRAINING PROGRAMS
Damian has supported many agencies with on-call modeling services, including San
Mateo C/CAG, BART, Marin TAM, Alameda CTC, Alameda County, CCTA, Kern
County, Livermore, and Hayward. He has developed and led training programs in
travel forecasting, forecasting software, traffic impact analysis and computer
applications. Clients have included California Department of Transportation, Alameda
County, Kern County, City of Livermore and Oregon Department of Transportation.
Kittelson is one of the authorized on-call consultants to advise and support CCTA,
Alameda CTC, C/CAG and Marin TAM.
TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING
Damian has led and worked on many travel demand modeling studies, including
development and adaptation of the MTC Regional Model (MTCFCAST and BAYCAST),
Alameda Countywide model, San Mateo C/CAG model, Marin TAM model, City of
Livermore model, City of Hayward model, City of Alameda model, KERN COG model,
Fresno COG model, Boise model, PSRC model, Orlando FDOT model, Washington DC
model, and HGAC Houston model.
PLANNING PROJECTS
Damian has conducted numerous planning studies, general plans, specific plans, and
CEQA traffic studies; including the Hayward General Plan, San Leandro General Plan,
Mission Boulevard Specific Plan EIR, Hayward Route 238 Land Use Study, San Leandro
Kaiser Medical and Retail EIR, Oakland Army Base EIR, Lake Merritt Specific Plan EIR,
EDUCATION
Graduate, University of the
Witwatersrand,
Johannesburg, SA, 1988
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
30
AFFILIATIONS
Institute of Transportation
Engineers, Member
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-16
Damian Stefanakis | P2
West Oakland Specific Plan EIR, El Charro Road Specific Plan/Outlet Mall EIR, South Hayward BART Specific Plan EIR,
Hayward Route 238 Corridor EIR, and the SR 84 East-West Connector Project Study Report (PSR) and EIR. He has also
conducted freeway corridor studies including I-580 Westbound HOV Lane EIR, I-880 HOV Lanes, I-880/Marina Boulevard
PSR,US 101 HOT/HOV Lanes, AC Transit BRT FEIR, and the BART to Livermore Extension EIR.
HALCYON DRIVE INDUSTRIAL TIA –SAN LEANDRO, CA
Damian led the traffic impact analysis for the project and assessed onsite circulation and access to the project site. He
also identified offsite improvements that would allow trucks to turn into and out of the project site safely.
DUBLIN BOULEVARD EXTENSION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) -DUBLIN/LIVERMORE, CA
Damian has served as project principal, overseeing the traffic analysis for the design and CEQA phase of this project.
Damian coordinated with all stakeholders, including the prime consultant, EIR consultant, cities, county and Caltrans,
on the project. Damian was responsible for the traffic analysis, including preparing travel demand model forecasts
using the Alameda CTC model, and traffic operations analysis of 15 study intersections for 2017, 2025 and 2040
scenarios using Synchro software to assist in assessing the impacts of constructing a 4-lane roadway extension north of
I-580 to Dublin Boulevard between Fallon Road in Dublin and North Canyons Parkway in Livermore. Additionally,
Damian supported the design and CEQA teams with the completion of the draft traffic operations report (TOAR) and
developed traffic data for green-house gas and air quality emissions analysis. The traffic analysis has been completed,
with circulation of the DEIR in July 2018. The overall study is anticipated to be complete by end of 2018.
2040 GENERAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) -HAYWARD, CA
Damian was the project manager for the circulation and transportation elements of the Hayward General Plan.
Damian worked on the background reports, circulation policies, potential for incorporating complete streets, and
traffic analysis for the CEQA EIR. Damian utilized the Alameda CTC Countywide Model with ABAG Projections 2009 to
evaluate the land use changes for the proposed General Plan Project for 2035 buildout conditions.Damian analyzed
up to 25 roadway segments and 42 study intersections using Traffix LOS software to quantify potential impacts and
identify feasible mitigations required beyond the Policy mitigating ones.
DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) -HAYWARD, CA
Damian is project manager,providing analysis for traffic and transportation circulation options for the downtown
specific plan. Damian is using the most recent Alameda CTC CUBE model with ABAG Projections 2017 Plan Bay Area to
test the various circulation options and develop travel demand forecasts for the EIR phase. Analysis of up to 20
intersections will be conducted for existing and 2040 cumulative conditions using the Synchro software. The Specific
Plan phase was completed by end of 2017, and EIR phase will be completed in 2018.
ARMY BASE ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT (EIR) ADDENDUM -OAKLAND, CA
Damian performed the travel demand modeling analysis for 2012 Oakland Army Base Addendum to the 2001
Oakland Army Base Redevelopment Plan Area EIR using an enhanced version of the Alameda CTC model with
additional network and traffic zone detail in the port area. He also provided auto and truck forecasts for the project
land uses for 2035 cumulative conditions used in the EIR. The owner of this work was both the City of Oakland and the
Port of Oakland.
SHORELINE SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) -SAN LEANDRO, CA
Damian served as project manager providing traffic analysis for this specific plan and EIR located in San Leandro west
of I-880. Kittelson performed all traffic analysis at 32 study intersections for weekday and weekend conditions for
existing and 2035 cumulative conditions. Damian used the Alameda Countywide model to distribute and assign the
projects trips to the local streets and freeway segments for 2035 conditions. The project was successfully completed
and approved by City Council in June 2015.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-17
Miao Gao, EIT | P1
MIAO GAO, EIT
Engineering Associate
Miao (Mia) has applied her formal education in transportation planning and her strong
analytical skills to the completion of projects across the U.S. for numerous
transportation agencies. Mia’s experience includes systemic safety analysis, travel
demand modeling, long-range transportation planning, traffic impacts, growth
management, traffic simulation, operational analysis, and data collection. Specific
projects include SSARs for the cities of Hemet and Menifee, OCTA’s SB 743 analysis,
and updates to/applications of countywide travel models. Mia has conducted travel
demand modeling using CUBE, TRANSCAD, and other programs; and analyzed traffic
operations using SYNCHRO, VISSIM, and HCS.
SYSTEMIC SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PROJECT -HEMET, CA
Mia is providing safety analysis support for Kittelson’s work to identify safety projects for
improvement throughout the City of Hemet and Menifee, including signalized
intersections, non-signalized intersections, and roadway segments. The analysis is
consistent with the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) vision, mission, goals,
objectives, and approach.
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (OCTA)HARBOR BLVD TRANSIT
CORRIDOR STUDY -ORANGE COUNTY, CA
Mia led an FTA New Starts transit performance measurement study by simulating transit
routes in the regional travel demand model in TransCAD and Simplified Trips-on-Project
software (STOPS) for Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Twelve transit
alternatives were evaluated, and performance measurements were summarized for
OCTA to review.
GENERAL PLAN & ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR)-SAN LEANDRO, CA
Mia is part of the Kittelson team to support the City of San Leandro general plan
updates, including traffic, mobility, multimodal components and EIR.Mia is leading
the efforts of checking GIS inventory of road network and updates right of way status.
BAYFAIR TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR)-SAN
LEANDRO, CA
Mia is part of Kittelson team to conduct EIR of Bay Fair Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART)
station, including traffic and transportation planning and operation analysis. Mia is
leading the traffic simulation and LOS analysis of the study area.
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (OCTA)SB 743 SUPPORT -ORANGE
COUNTY, CA
Mia is helping OCTA to conduct guidance of updating California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) traffic analysis criteria based on the SB 743, which is eliminating
level of service as measurement of traffic impacts. For this effort, the work included
running the OCTA model and Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)
model in TransCAD and analyzing and visualizing VMT/capita and VMT/employee
data for Orange County, reviewing other VMT estimating tools and conducting
recommendations for OCTA CMP guidance.
INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS -RICHMOND, CA
Mia used the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) TransCAD model to
support traffic impact analysis of a proposed Richmond high-cube industrial
warehouse. The trip distribution and traffic volume growth rate generated from model
were used for project trip distribution and cumulative traffic volume calculation.
EDUCATION
Master of Science, University
of Nebraska at Lincoln, 2009
Bachelor of Science, Wuhan
University, 2006
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
7
LICENSES
Engineer In Training, WV
AFFILIATIONS
WTS, Member
PUBLICATIONS
Long-term Safety Impact of
Median Barriers at Highway-
Railroad Grade Crossings
Truck Safety at Highway-
Railroad Crossing Intersection
Ridership Forecasting for
Central Corridor Passenger
Rail Line Utilizing Cell Phone
Data in Direct Demand
Model
The Impact of Removing
Centerline Barriers from
Highway–Rail Grade
Crossings on Drivers’
Violations
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-18
Joan Isaacson
Vice President and Senior Facilitator
Summary of Qualifications
Joan Isaacson is a vice president at Kearns & West, and brings 25 years
of experience in community engagement, stakeholder facilitation, and
urban and environmental planning across Southern California. At the
core of her work is a commitment to formulating the best facilitation
and engagement strategy to ensure successful, viable project outcomes.
With particular focus on urbanized environments, she has led public
involvement programs for general plans, community and specific plans,
transit-oriented development strategies, urban infill and
redevelopment, parks and open space plans, multi-modal
transportation and transit planning, climate action plans, and CEQA
review. She has led community and stakeholder engagement on 20+
general plans and community plans in Southern California.
Joan’s participatory programs have included focus groups, advisory
committees, stakeholder interviews, customized website dialogue
platforms, online and telephone surveys, pop-up outreach, public
workshops and open houses, webinars, success story campaigns,
educational videos and newsletters, and media monitoring. She also has
special expertise in conducting multi-language and multi-cultural
community engagement. As testament to her facilitation prowess,
clients call upon her for special facilitation assignments, including
advisory committees, public meetings, and internal staff trainings.
In addition to her project work, Joan lectures on community engagement
and stakeholder engagement in Southern California, and has served in
volunteer leadership roles for community and arts organizations.
Relevant Experience
Northside Specific Plan, City of Riverside
The launch of this project has been awaited for many years by residents,
property owners, and the City of Riverside, to address best use of several
large opportunity areas, community needs for better local shopping and
mobility, and connections with its history and environment. Kearns & West is
leading the community involvement program as a member of the planning
team, and is working with the City on establishing the framework for a
multi-pronged program of traditional methods, including a series of
community workshops, and innovative methods to involve people typically
underrepresented in public process, such as school open houses, booths at
community events, office hours with the planning team in the neighborhood,
and partnering with local organizations. Nearly 20 organizations provided
input on the community involvement plan itself.
Discipline/Specialty
Public Participation
Facilitation
Urban Planning
Strategy
Public Policy
Education
B.S., Psychology, Cal State
University, Fullerton
M.A., Geography, San Diego
State University
Training/Certifications
International Association of
Public Participation
American Institute of
Certified Planners
Professional Affiliations
American Planning Association
Lambda Alpha International
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-19
City of Laguna Hills General Plan Update and EIR
For the Laguna Hills General Plan Update, Joan managed a multi-pronged public involvement process.
Integrating principles of sustainability and healthy communities into a new long-range vision and development
plan. The public participation program involved a General Plan Advisory Committee, a series of public
workshops, periodic newsletters, graphic “branding” for all collateral materials, citywide survey, and a
planning forum featuring experts in sustainability and healthy communities.
City of Lake Forest Hills General Plan Update and EIR
When Lake Forest incorporated in the early 1990s, Joan served as project planner on the consultant team that
prepared the City’s first General Plan and corresponding EIR. She was involved in research and writing
sections of both documents, and provided support at public workshops.
Best Practice Highlights for Sustainable Community Grant-Funded Planning Activities, California Strategic
Growth Council
Joan is leading Kearns &West’s team charged with screening 125 planning activities funded by the Strategic
Growth Council, including focused general plan updates, corridor plans, specific and community plans, and
regional sustainable community strategies. The end product, intended for elected officials, community leaders,
and stakeholder interests, will showcase examples of planning activities that exemplify multiple sustainability
benefits, community engagement and stakeholder collaborations, and integration of unique local strengths.
Commercial/Mixed-Use Zoning Update and EIR, City of Imperial Beach
As Project Director and Public Participation Leader, Joan led a team composed of urban designers,
mobility/parking planners, zoning experts, and economists to assess the existing zoning and development
trends in order to craft amendments that better achieve the community’s vision and regional transit-oriented
development policies.
Southeast Area Specific Plan, City of Long Beach
While mostly built out, several development opportunities occur near wetlands and along Pacific Coast
Highway, the primary commercial corridor. Prior attempts to update planning policy languished due to
controversy, but in 2013 the City relaunched a participatory process to achieve an implementable plan,
including a community advisory committee, public workshops and open houses, informational materials, pop-
up outreach, an online discussion forum, and media relations.
City of Mission Viejo Heart-of-the-City Vision Plan
Joan is leading the public involvement program for an exciting visioning process in Mission Viejo. The City
Council charged the team with involving the cross-section of Mission Viejo communities in exploring
possibilities for new places, experiences and changes in the central civic and commercial core. Working closely
with the team urban designers and economists, Joan and her team are supporting popup outreach, community
workshops, website and social media, citywide survey, and youth workshops.
San Marcos General Plan Update and EIR
The City of San Marcos updated its long-term city-wide planning framework for land use, transportation, and
environmental initiatives, with a special focus on infill/TOD opportunities. The comprehensive community
involvement program managed by Joan included multiple series of community workshops, interactive website,
telephone survey, youth program, and advisory committee, with focus on Spanish-speaking residents.
De Anza Revitalization Plan/Mission Bay Park, City of San Diego
Joan directed the initial phase of public involvement in the City of San Diego’s initial planning for the next
chapter of this significant property within Mission Bay Park, balancing new public recreational activities,
wetland restoration, mobility improvements, camping, and a sustainable revenue stream. The program
included an ad hoc committee, community workshops, an online discussion forum, stakeholder interviews, and
pop-up outreach. Joan facilitated all committee meetings and community workshops.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-20
Taylor York
Senior Associate
Summary of Qualifications
Taylor York is a Senior Associate in Kearns & West’s strategic
communications practice with a specialty in community and
stakeholder engagement for of urban planning, conservation, education,
energy, air quality, and transportation projects. Taylor has a diverse skill
set, including project management, community engagement,
collaboration, meeting facilitation, event planning, and material
development. He has experience engaging a wide range of stakeholder
groups, on both a regional and local basis, inlcuding public agencies,
utilities, community groups, youth, and Native American tribes, and
focuses much of his work in the Inland Empire region.
His experience includes a key role in the outreach component of the
Riverside Northside Specific Plan and Mission Viejo Core Area Vision
Plan projects, and he currently serves as Co-Coordinator of the Western
Riverside County Clean Cities Coalition. The Coalition works to create
consensus and build public-private partnerships to promote and
support alternative fuel vehicle adoption, public education, and
planning and installation of associated fueling infrastructure – all with
the goal of improving air quality in Western Riverside County.
Taylor holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Urban and Regional
Planning, from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, and
currently serves as a Steering Committee Member for the Inland Empire
Branch of the U.S. Green Building Council, Los Angeles. He is a member
of the International Association for Public Participation, through which
he has completed training in managing conflict and outrage during
public and stakeholder meetings.
Relevant Experience
Riverside Northside Specific Plan
Taylor plays a key role in the community engagement portion of the
Riverside Northside Specific Plan project. The project is heavily guided
by community input, and seeks to create a heathy, sustainable vision for
the neighborhood. The plan will consider land use, transportation,
recreation, and natural and cultural resources, as well as other topics.
Taylor is responsible for assisting with the strategy and organization of
public outreach events, as well as helping to translate public input into
useful feedback for the planning and design teams.
Mission Viejo Heart-of-the-City Vision Plan
Taylor supported the public outreach component of the Mission Viejo
Heart-of-the-City Vision Plan development. He was responsible for
assisting with the strategy and organization of public outreach events,
Office Address
Southern California Practice
Riverside Office
3600 Lime Street, Suite 226
Riverside, CA 92501
Discipline/Specialty
Strategic Communications
Community Engagement
Education
Local Government Policy
Issue and Policy Research
Media Relations
Project Management and
Support
Social Media
Meeting Facilitation
Environment
Education
B.S.,Urban and Regional
Planning,California State
Polytechnic University,
Pomona
Affiliations
International Association for
Public Participation (IAP2) –
Member
United States Green Building
Council (USGBC), Los Angeles
Chapter –Inland Empire
Branch, Steering Committee
Member.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-21
as well as helping to translate public input into useful feedback for the design team. The project
seeks to create a vision for what is considered the core of Mission Viejo, and is heavily centered
around community input.
Western Riverside County Clean Cities Coalition
For three years, Taylor worked to create partnerships, conduct large- and small-scale outreach and
educational programs, facilitate multi-regional collaboration. The misssion of the Coalition is to
promote healthier communities through air quality awareness, energy and water conservation, and
health, issues that adversely affect disadvantaged communities in Western Riverside County. At the
time, 11 Riverside County jurisdictions participated in the program, among dozens of private sector
partners. Taylor currently serves as the Coaltion’s Co-Coordinator, through contract work with
Western Riverside Council of Governments.
Western Riverside County Alternative Fueling Station Study
Taylor is currently working through the Western Riverside County Clean Cities Coalition to assist
with an alternative fuel vehicle fueling infrastructure study for Western Riverside County. The goal
of the project is to aid in understanding use and demand for alternative vehicles by local
jurisdiction fleets, and to examine where alternative fuel vehicle fueling structure currently exists
and where there are opportunities for new infrastructure. The project will be accomplished using
data avaible through the Department of Energy, as well as direct engagement of local jurisdictions.
Western Riverside County Active Transportation Plan
Taylor played a key role in the on-going update to the Western Riverside Active Transportation
Plan. He was responsible for translating active transportation needs in the WRCOG sub-region into
a proposal to seek funding for a much needed update to the existing WRCOG Non-Motorized
Transportation Plan. Through this project, Taylor was closely involved with developing the
Riverside County Active Transportation Network, and served as one of its first Co-Chairs. The
Network is currently active, and provides an important forum for networking and resource sharing
among a wide variety of regional active transportation stakeholders.
Ten West Link Transmission Line
Taylor supports stakeholder identification, public engagement, and meeting and event facilitation
for the Ten West Link transmission line project, a proposed 500kv electrical connection that would
transmit energy between Southeast California and Southwest Arizona. For this project, Taylor is
able to build upon his relationships with local agencies, jurisdictions, and community groups, as
well as develop new relationships with local landowners and Native American Tribes. Taylor leads
the identification of outreach targets and strategy, and coordinates and facilitates project update
meetings and communication between these stakeholders and project team members.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-22
Jenna Tourje
Director
Summary of Qualifications
Jenna Tourjé is a Senior Engagement Director at Kearns & West with
over 10 years of experience in community engagement, urban
planning, and community building. She is passionate about
partnering with communities on the path to creating healthy, whole
and equitable places, where people love where they live and have a
voice and a stake in the future.
Through her experience both as a non-profit director and outreach
professional engaging disadvantaged communities throughout
Southern California, Jenna’s unique expertise informs each one of her
projects. She has led outreach projects related to health, active
transportation, transportation planning, community planning, flood-
risk & resiliency, and parks and open space. Her clients include non-
profit collaborations, municipalities, and regional and federal
agencies.
As a project manager for the County of San Bernardino Community
Plans Continuum process, Jenna’s team has developed community
plans for 26 unincorporated communities in San Bernardino County.
She has facilitated community engagement processes for resiliency,
transportation planning, and flood risk with FEMA, L.A. Metro, and
cities throughout California. Certified by the International
Association of Public Participation (IAP2), Jenna has worked with
private, public, and nonprofit agencies in engaging communities in
meaningful (and fun!) engagement processes. Jenna is a native of
Riverside County.
Relevant Experience
Executive Director, Mika Community Development
Corporation
Jenna served as a board member and Executive Director for Mika
Community Development Corporation. Mika works directly with
disadvantaged communities in Costa Mesa, CA to do community
development, leadership development, and capacity building.
Community Plans Continuum Project, County of San
Bernardino
As Group Project Manager, Jenna was responsible for managing
six community plans in San Bernardino County as part of the
larger community planning effort. In addition, she was
responsible for leading the Health Technical Team. As part of the
countywide planning process, Jenna helped lead the development
of community plans for 26 unincorporated communities.
Communities range from the San Bernardino Mountains to the
Office Address
Southern California Practice
Riverside Office
3600 Lime Street, Suite 226
Riverside, CA 92501
Discipline/Specialty
Public Participation
Facilitation
Urban Planning
Community Development
Education
B.A.,International
Development,University of
California,Irvine, 2007
M.U.R.P. Urban and Regional
Planning, University of
California, Irvine, 2011
Training/Certifications
International Association of
Public Participation
American Institute of
Certified Planners
Professional Affiliations
American Planning Association
Christian Community
Development Association
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-23
Page 2 of 3
Mojave Desert. The project included intensive immersion weeks where multiple facilitations
teams are immersed in each community conducting collaborative public workshops.
General Plan Outreach 2014, Scottsdale, Arizona. City of Scottsdale, Arizona
Jenna led the preparation of outreach materials and design of outreach activities for the
project. As the lead public involvement consultant, her team provided public engagement
guidance, graphic design, project messaging, and workshop strategy development
assistance to the city’s long-range planning staff. Specific work tasks included assisting in
the development of public information material; coordination of land use design charrettes;
development of strategy; facilitation of “World Café” workshop discussions; and
development of self-guided workshop-in-a-box informational materials along with video
montages, social media announcements, and project website content for public
consumption.
Rim of the World Active Transportation, SANBAG
As public involvement manager on the project, Jenna’s responsibilities included direction
and coordination of outreach and engagement activities throughout the planning process.
Specific outreach programs and activities included interactive online surveys, pop-up
workshops, stakeholder tours, asset mapping, and community workshops.
Valley Boulevard Corridor Specific Plan Health and Wellness Elements, SCAG
Jenna was responsible for coordinating public engagement efforts, researching and writing
the Health and Wellness Profile, and facilitating workshops. Michael Baker provided
planning services to incorporate a health and wellness focus into the specific plan for the
Valley Boulevard Corridor. Michael Baker’s services included vision development, corridor
planning, and recommendations.
Community Engagement and Risk Communications, FEMA
Jenna provided outreach and facilitation support for Region 8, including on-the-ground
stakeholder meeting support and facilitation during the kick-off and discovery
phases. Michael Baker is a member of the national Community Engagement and Risk
Communication team for the Risk Mapping, Assessment, and Planning program. Michael
Baker’s services include hazard mitigation planning, community outreach, preparation and
dissemination of outreach materials, and development and delivery of training for
stakeholders.
Comprehensive General Plan Update, Rancho Santa Margarita, California. City of
Rancho Santa Margarita
Responsible for working with the project team and city to conduct public outreach and
engagement. Outreach included external communications, focus groups, roadshows, and
pop-up workshops. Michael Baker prepared the city’s Comprehensive General Plan Update
and associated Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The focus of the update is to "refresh"
the Land Use, Economic Development, Conservation/Open Space, Safety, and Noise
elements to address the continued vision for the city. Additionally, updates will ensure that
all elements are consistent with new state requirements for general plans. The scope of work
included a tour of the city, a city staff summit, community engagement, website design, and
workshops with the City Council and/or Planning Commission. In addition, the city also
requested that Michael Baker prepare a retail market analysis and laborshed analysis
(spatial mapping of commuting patterns).
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-24
Melina Smith-Castro
Bilingual Community Engagement Coordinator
Summary of Qualifications
Melina Smith-Castro is a Project Coordinator with Kearns & West
in San Diego with a specialty in the fields of urban planning and
environmental conservation. Melina has a diverse skill set, and
experience including bilingual public engagement, outreach in
disadvantaged communities, facilitation, project management, and
issue and policy research.
Her past experiences include stakeholder engagement for the Paso
Robles downtown revitalization plan, bilingual community
outreach for the city of Santa Maria’s General Plan update, and
supporting city-wide initiatives for traffic mitigation. She has
experience applying GIS for research mapping, facilitating public
outreach events, building relationships with a diverse range of
stakeholders, and working in public offices both locally and
internationally. She fluently communications in Spanish, and takes
great care in creating comfortable, friendly environments for
conversations about community needs and goals.
Melina holds a Bachelor of Science in Urban and Regional planning
and a minor in Sustainable Environments from California Polytechnic
University, San Luis Obispo. Her coursework focused on public
outreach and environmental planning.
Relevant Experience
Santa Maria General Plan Update
Melina acted as the outreach leader for her class project in
proposing policies to the City of Santa Maria for incorporation into
the update of their General Plan. Santa Maria is a diverse
community with a large Hispanic and Oaxacan Community. She
contacted local non-profits, organizations, stakeholders, and city
officials to coordinate public outreach events. Melina conducted
bilingual outreach at public events, local markets, soccer games,
and Boys and Girls Clubs. She created project materials such as
brochures and policy proposals. She successfully acquired feedback
including the wants and needs of community in the future of their
city, and spoke on behalf of the class in presenting this information
to city officials.
Paso Robles Downtown Revitalization Plan
Melina acted as the outreach leader for her class in creating a
design for the industrial downtown of Paso Robles. She contacted
Office Address
Southern California Practice
San Diego Office
3956 30th Street
San Diego, CA 92104
Discipline/Specialty
Project Management and
Support
Stakeholder Engagement
Spanish Public Outreach
Issue and Policy Research
Environmental Conservation
Education
B.S., City and Regional
Planning, California Polytenic
University, San Luis Obispo
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-25
landowners with vacant lots in the area and successfully received permission to propose their
lots as community gardens and public open space. Melina also conducted community outreach
in the form of surveys to receive feedback to better inform the final design proposal. She
created project materials including brochures, maps, site plans, and renderings. She presented
the final design proposal to the City of Paso Robles on behalf of her class.
San Miguel De Allende Traffic Plan
Melina participated in the preliminary phase of city efforts to create a traffic plan for the City
of San Miguel de Allende, México. She used GIS to map out intersections and congestion, and
analyzed the findings in order to lay the groundwork for the traffic plan
Eco-village Research Project
Melina conducted her senior project in an Eco-village in Guanajuato, Mexico. She
interviewed, profiled, and stayed with community members. Melina addressed the social
and political impacts of self-sustaining communities in Mexico, and discussed
opportunities for economic autonomy. Her research included outreach interviews within
the village, and the greater community surrounded it.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-26
Mike Dickerson Jr., INCE
Principal
Mike Dickerson has a passion for the science of sound and vibration and has worked
professionally in acoustical engineering since 2002. He received his Bachelor of
Science degree in Physics, emphasizing in acoustics from Brigham Young University in
Utah. He is currently a member of the Institute of Noise Control Engineers (INCE).
Motivated by professional growth and opportunity, Mr. Dickerson formed his own
acoustical engineering firm, MD Acoustics in 2012. Mr. Dickerson’s versatile
experience includes leading and assisting in the design and review of many facets of
acoustical engineering and air quality projects, including but not limited to air/noise
assessments, ceiling/floor assembly design, architectural design, acoustical product
design, vibration analysis and noise mitigation strategies.
Prior to starting his own consulting firm, Mr. Dickerson worked for Sony Entertainment, Parsons, and RK Engineering. He
has successfully completed over 2,200 acoustical/air quality assessment reports for various engineering companies,
municipalities and other agencies (both public and private). His strategic project planning and cost effective management
solutions enabled him to excel in the field of Acoustics and project management.
In 2011, Mr. Dickerson was asked to present a paper at the Acoustical Society of America Seattle, Washington Conference
on his research and work on noise and vibration in Cockpit Door Modules. MD continues to work closely with many
engineering disciplines and provides quality results.
Education
Brigham Young University
B.S., Physics (Acoustics), 2005
Affiliations and Awards
Institute of Noise Control Engineers (INCE)
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
BYU Acoustic Research Group
Association of Environmental Planners (AEP)
Representative Project Experience
Architectural Acoustics Assessment/Design
Monterrey Park Residential and Hotel Mixed Use Development, Monterrey Park, CA
57 Wheeler Mixed Use Development, Arcadia, CA
Melrose Triangle Mixed Use Development, West Hollywood, CA
Britanna at Oyster Point, South San Francisco, CA
Marina City Club, Marina Del Rey, CA
Wells Fargo Corporate Office, Chandler, AZ
Peoria Sports Complex – Seattle Mariners Lobby, Peoria, AZ
Intel Corporation CH5‐216/217, Chandler, AZ
Revolt Studio, Hollywood, CA
Mammoth Rock and Bowl, Mammoth Lakes, CA
Rubios Restaurant, San Diego, CA
Americana at Brand, Glendale, CA
6300 Hollywood Blvd Retail Space, Hollywood, CA
Calvary Church Renovations, Santa Ana, CA
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-27
Mike Dickerson Jr., INCE
Principal
Noise and Vibration Assessment
Central Metal Incorporated Reclamation Plant Expansion, Los Angeles, CA
Sonora Commons – North Gateway Transfer Station, Phoenix, AZ
Hotel and Water Park Development, Garden Grove, CA
Longbow Development Aircraft Noise, Mesa, AZ
La Ventilla Development I‐10 Freeway, Goodyear, AZ
Wells Park Pump Improvement, Chino Hills, CA
Hog Wash Car Wash, Phoenix, AZ
Oil and Gas Noise and Vibration Assessment
La Goleta Storage Field Enhancement, Santa Barbara County, CA
Whittier Workman Mill Road Oil Rig Drilling Operation, Los Angeles County, CA
La Goleta Storage Compressor Vibration, Santa Barbara County, CA
Mills Station Excavation Noise and Vibration, Ventura, CA
Highway/Airport/Rail Noise and Vibration
Caltrans Yucaipa Bridge Box Culvert Improvement, Yucaipa, CA
Caltrans SR‐110 Freeway Expansion, Los Angeles, CA
Jackson Hole Airport Noise Contours and Flight Path Evaluation, Jackson Hole, WY
Light Rail Transit Exposition Blvd to Culver Dr, Los Angeles, CA
Telecommunications
T‐Mobile Telecommunication Tower, Calabasas, CA
T‐Mobile Telecommunication Tower, Malibu, CA
Verizon Wireless Telecommunication Tower, Santa Clarita
Construction Noise and Vibration
La Goleta Storage Field Enhancement (1‐yr construction monitoring), Santa Barbara County, CA
Westin Bonaventura Hotel, Los Angeles, CA
Railroad Canyon Road Expansion, Riverside, CA
Industrial Noise and Vibration Assessment
Intel Corporation – Noise Evaluations
NXP Semiconductor – Noise Evaluations
Hexcel Corporation Dust Collector Noise & Vibration, Casa Grande, AZ
ABB Inverter Operation Noise and Vibration, Tempe, AZ
Pacific Scientific Shaker Room, Chandler, AZ
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-28
Claire Pincock
Acoustical Consultant
Claire Pincock graduated from Brigham Young University in the top 5% of her graduating
class with a Bachelor of Science degree in Applied Physics with an emphasis in acoustics and a
minor in Mathematics. Prior to her joining MD Acoustics, she was a research assistant at BYU.
Her research was focused on speech acoustics, specifically on how speech radiates from the
mouth. https://www.physics.byu.edu/thesis/archive/2017
In 2017, Claire presented her research with Dr. Timothy Leishman on speech directivity at the
Acoustical Society of America, spring Boston conference where she placed 2nd in the student
poster competition. http://asa.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1121/1.4987652
Education
Brigham Young University
B.S., Applied Physics (Acoustics), 2017
Magna Cum Laude
Affiliations and Awards
Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
BYU Acoustic Research Group
American Institute of Physics (AIP)
Representative Project Experience
Architectural Acoustics Assessment
Vista Del Mar Residential Development, Dana Point, CA
Hampton Inn, Santa Ana, CA
Noise and Vibration Assessment
Vineland Gas Station and Car Wash, Los Angeles, CA
Lakeview Terrace Gas Station & Car Wash, Los Angeles, CA
Van Buren Blvd Express Car Wash, Riverside, CA
Estrella Commons Residential Development, Goodyear, AZ
Blackstone & McKinley Multi‐Family Development, Fresno, CA
Haven at 26th Mixed Residences, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Berylwood Park Skatepark, Simi Valley, CA
Marshalls – Del Amo Plaza, Torrance, CA
Desert Land Ventures, Desert Hot Springs, CA
Construction Noise and Vibration
Mae Boyar Park Community Building, Oak Park, CA
Noise Reviews/Updates
Mt. San Antonio College Facilities and Projects Noise Review, Walnut, CA
French Valley Airport Development, Riverside Co., CA
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-29
18 Technology Dr., Ste. 103
Irvine, CA 92618
949-356-6660
www.dukecrm.com
ArchAeology history PAleontology
Curt Duke
President/Principal Archaeologist
Expertise
Cultural Resources Management
California Prehistory
Section 106 Compliance
CEQA Compliance
Native American Consultation
Education
CSU, Fullerton, M.A., Anth, 2006
SDSU, Grad Studies, Anth, 1996/97
UC Santa Cruz, B.A., Anth, 1994
Professional Registrations
RPA, No. 15969
County of Riverside ( No. 151)
County of Orange
Professional Memberships
Society for California Archaeology
Society for American Archaeology
Pacific Coast Archaeological Society
Assoc. of Environmental Professionals
Building Industry Association
Professional Experience
President/Archaeologist, DUKE CRM, March 2011 to present.
Archaeologist/Principal, LSA Associates, 1997-2011.
Archaeological Technician, SRI, 1997.
Archaeological Technician, Petra Resources, 1997.
Archaeological Technician, KEA Environmental, 1997.
Archaeological Technician, Keith Companies, 1997.
Archaeological Technician, KEA Environmental, 1997.
Archaeological/Paleontological Technician, LSA Associates, 1996.
Archaeological/Paleontological Technician, Petra Resources, 1996.
Archaeological Technician, Affinis Environmental Services, 1996.
Archaeological Technician, KEA Environmental, 1996.
Archaeological Technician, Macko Archaeological Consulting, 1995 to 1996.
Archaeological Technician, Heritage Resource Consultants, 1995.
Archaeological Technician, Chambers Group, 1995.
Archaeological Technician/Teachers Assistant, Cabrillo College, 1994
Anthropological Laboratory Technician, UC Santa Cruz, 1994.
Selected Project Experience
San Jacinto Downtown Specific Plan, San Jacinto, 2016-17
Mr. Duke was the Principal Investigator for the project’s cultural resources
assessment for the 1,158-acre San Jacinto Downtown Specific Plan. In
addition to overseeing the work conducted he led the Native American
consultation support for the City’s AB-52 and SB-18 requirements working
with the City and Soboba and Pechanga. As part of this effort, he scoped out a
cultural landscape effort that would be implemented in the future as part of
implementation of the Specific Plan or possibly the City’s General Plan.
Diamond Valley Estates Specific Plan, Hemet, 2017-Present
Curt Duke is the Project Manager and Principal Archaeologist for this project.
Working with his team they have provided cultural and paleontological
resources services. Research and field survey identified 27 cultural resources
within the project. Fourteen of the resources are not eligible for the
NRHP/CRHR while 13 are considered potentially eligible; Phase II excavation
is recommended to make formal determinations of eligibility. One of these
resources is a very large village site (43 acres) with hundreds of bedrock milling
slicks and mortars, multiple artifact scatters, midden soil, cupules, and much
more. In addition, through consultation with local Tribes, we identified that
the project is located within a potential ethnographic cultural landscape. This
project has involved extensive consultation with local Tribes and the County
of Riverside, and we are preparing to begin an ethnographic cultural landscape
study. Due to the complexity and high sensitivity for archaeological sites
within DVE, DUKE CRM has brought in multiple subconsultants to assist
with this project (geoarchaeologist, ethnographer, and ethnobotanist). Our
team recently completed buried sites testing on the TTM project and is
preparing to conduct further buried sites testing in the Specific Plan area.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-30
18 Technology Dr., Ste. 103
Irvine, CA 92618
949-356-6660
www.dukecrm.com
ArchAeology history PAleontology
Mid County Parkway (MCP), San Jacinto to Corona, Riverside County, CA, 2004-2011
Mr. Duke was the cultural resources task manager for the MCP project. The studies for the MCP project included a 32-mile
corridor (from Interstate 15 to State Route 79) in western Riverside County. The archaeological survey covered 3,680 acres and
identified 91 archaeological sites. An Extended Phase I survey (limited excavation) was conducted at 79 of the sites. Ultimately
Phase II excavations were conducted at eight of the sites. Four archaeological sites were determined eligible for the National
Register. A built environment historic resources survey was conducted and one historic dairy was determined eligible for the
National Register. This project included extensive consultation with Indian Tribes. All work was conducted in compliance with
Section 106 of the NHPA, NEPA, and CEQA. FHWA, Caltrans, and RCTC were the lead agencies and Jacobs Engineering was
the lead engineering firm under contract to RCTC.
East Lake Specific Plan, Lake Elsinore, 2016-2017
DUKE CRM conducted a cultural resources assessment for the 3,000-acre East Lake Specific Plan. Mr. Duke was the Principal
Investigator. The cultural resources assessment included a record search, archival research, a reconnaissance survey for
archaeological resources, and Native American consultation support for the City’s AB-52 and SB-18 requirements. Twenty-two
cultural resources are known to exist within the Specific Plan area, one of which is a Traditional Cultural Property (TCP), Lake
Elsinore itself (Primary No. 33-11009). Through consultation with the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians it was determined that
while this resource is a sacred and significant Tribal Cultural Resource (TCR). This work was completed in compliance with
CEQA.
Murrieta General Plan Update, 2010-11
Mr. Duke was the Principal Archaeologist for this project. He and his team conducted a cultural resources assessment
to provide planning constraints and possible mitigation measures as part of the Murrieta General Plan Update. The
records search indicated that a great deal of the planning area had been previously surveyed for cultural resources. The
results of the records search indicate that 330 cultural resource studies have been conducted within the planning area,
resulting in the identification of 199 documented cultural resources. The previous studies within the planning area are
mainly cultural resource assessments, survey reports, and archaeological test excavations. The documented resources
within the planning area include more than 75 bedrock milling sites, 36 milling artifacts, 53 sites with lithic artifacts
(flakes, points, debitage), 5 sites with rock art, 9 possible prehistoric campsites or habitation sites, 3 possible prehistoric
quarries, 7 built resources, and 11 historic archaeological sites (trash scatters, habitation remains). The mitigation
measures were developed to comply with the guidelines of the CEQA.
Additional Relevant Experience
Vantage Point Church Monitoring, Eastvale, 2018-Present
Ventura County Transportation On-Call, Ventura County, 2018-Present
Union Street Two-Way Protected Bikeway, Pasadena, 2017-Present
Murrieta’s Hospitality Commons, Murrieta, 2017-Present
VA WLA Master Plan, Los Angeles, 2017-Present
Vanderham Monitoring, Jurupa Valley, 2017
Spruce Goose Hangar, Playa Vista, 2016
Vila Borba, Chino Hills, 2013-Present
Skyridge Residential, Mission Viejo, 2011-Present
Lincoln Specific Plan, Whittier, 2014
VA Clinic, Loma Linda, 2014-Present
Petersen Ranch, Leona Valley, 2013-2014
McSweeny Farms Specific Plan, Hemet, 2004-09
I-215/SR-74 IC Project, Perris, 2010-11
Mammoth Lakes Parks and Recreation and Trail System Master Plan, 2010
Hacienda at Fairview Valley Specific Plan, Apple Valley, CA, 2007-08
Majestic Hills Specific Plan, Hesperia, CA, 2006-07
Community and Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP), Riverside, CA, 1999-2001
Trailmark Specific Plan, Romoland, CA, 2004-05
Stoneridge Estates, Moreno Valley, CA, 2004
Arantine Hills Specific Plan, Corona, CA, 2010
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-31
ENVIROPRO CONSULTING LLC
Mitch Marken, Ph.D., LEEDAP
PRINCIPAL ARCHAEOLOGIST/ETHNOGRAPHER
Education and Training
Ph.D., Archaeology, University of St. Andrews, Scotland, 1991
Dpl., Archaeology and Ethnology, Maritime Studies, University of St. Andrews, Scotland,
1985
BLM National Programmatic Agreement Training / Nevada and California 2009
LEED Accredited Professional, US Green Building Council, 2009
Riverside County Archaeology and Cultural Sensitivity Training Program, 2007
SB 18 Training through the Native American Heritage Commission 2006
Section 106 Compliance Training (GSA Interagency Training Center)
Advanced Section 106 Compliance Training (GSA Interagency Training Center)
Working with Tribal Governments (GSA Interagency Training Center)
FERC Environmental Compliance Training, 1997 and 2015
Employment History
2017 – Present: EnviroPro Consulting LLC, Dana Point, CA., Director of Cultural Resources
2007 – 2017: ESA, Inc., San Francisco/Los Angeles/San Diego, CRM Practice Leader
2003 – 2007: PCR Services, Santa Monica, CA. Director of Cultural Resources
1996 - 2003: Tetra Tech, Inc., San Francisco, CA., Senior Scientist, Archaeologist
1993 – 1995: Mariah Associates, Reno, NV., Senior Archaeologist
1990 – 1992: Archaeological Research Services, Virginia City, NV., Archaeologist
MAJOR PUBLICATIONS
Books
The History of Soboba, Published with The Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians, available
through Lulu Press. This 200 plus page volume summarizes and synthesizes past
ethnographic and archaeological work in the San Jacinto, Riverside County area, CA.
Marken, et al. 2018.
Connected to the Landscape, Published by US Bureau of Land Management, available
through Lulu Press. This 700 plus page volume summarizes and synthesizes past
archaeological and historic ethnographic research in the Ford Dry Lake area between
Palm Springs, CA. and Blythe, CA. Marken, et al. 2016.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-32
ENVIROPRO CONSULTING LLC
SELECTED PROJECT EXAMPLES
Ethnographic Landscape Study, Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians, Prepared for Riverside
County Transportation Authority, Caltrans, as a sub-contractor to LSA. Principal
Investigator: M. Marken Ph.D., 2018
Historic Properties Treatment Plan (HPTP) for LINKS US at LA Union Station, Prepared for
Federal Railroad Authority, Metro as a sub-contractor to Paleo Solutions, Inc. and HDR.
Principal Investigator: M. Marken Ph.D., 2018
Ethnographic Landscape Study, Riverside National Cemetery, Riverside, Prepared for The
US Veterans Administration as an employee of Paleo Solutions. Principal Investigator: M.
Marken Ph.D., 2018
Bureau of Land Management – Genesis Solar Project, Southern California
Project Director for $1mm Ethnographic Mitigation study that involved Native American
tribal coordination, ethnographic interviews, and Section 106 consultation assistance.
Coordinated Public Scoping Meetings to support agency responsibilities under NEPA and
Section 106., 2017
Bureau of Land Management- On-Call Cultural Resources Contract, California Desert
District.
Project Director for a five-year on-call cultural resources contract. The numerous projects
completed for this contract range from small monitoring jobs, large survey and report
writing to review of reports and EIS preparation. When necessary, additional work was
contracted through BLM Master Agreements with project applicants and included
ethnography studies, landscape studies, survey and monitoring.
KB Home - The Cove Mitigation and Restoration-Los Angeles ACOE District Regulatory
Branch, CA, San Jacinto, CA
Project Director. Developed and implemented cultural resources mitigation, human
remains treatment plans, and native landscape restoration plans for the Cove, a residential
development near San Jacinto, CA. Responsible for Native American tribal consultation and
incorporation of tribal concerns. Directed archaeological crews, authored reports,
supervised restoration engineers, and assisted landscape engineers.
California Department of Water Resources -On-Call Environmental Planning Services for
Upgrades to the California Aqueduct East Branch, Southern California
Cultural Resources Task Leader. Managed and contributed to the preparation of technical
studies and corresponding Environmental Impact Report (EIR) sections for cultural
resources for the California Department of Water Resources projects, including the East
Branch Enlargement, East Branch Extension Phase II, and the Perris Lake Dam Retrofit
Project. The main project included the preparation of an EIR for the enlargement of 100
miles of the East Branch Aqueduct.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-33
Jennifer Mermilliod, M.A.
JM Research and Consulting
Statement of Qualifications
Jennifer Mermilliod, M.A., Principal Historian/Architectural Historian, JMRC, exceeds the Secretary of the
Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards for History and Architectural History.
Education
University of California, Riverside
Master of Arts in History,Program for Historic Resources Management. 2001.
Bachelor of Arts in History.2000.
Professional Experience
Cultural Resources Consultant: 2001 to present
JM Research and Consulting (JMRC)
JMRC provides a high level of professional integrity that is responsive to the needs of private and public
entities, individuals, and multi-partner teams.JMRC routinely contracts or coordinates with local, state,
and federal agencies to ensure compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), Senate Bill 18 (SB 18), Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
(Section 106), and the National Environmental Quality Act (NEQA). JMRC’s portfolio features preservation
planning and management; policy and program development; regulatory compliance; public meeting,
hearing, and community presentation; grant acquisition and management; project design, entitlement,
permitting, and construction consultation; management of contractors and trades; project team
development and management; research and historic context development;evaluation and designation at
all levels; mitigation development and compliance;marketing and fund development; and engaging public,
press, and political figures.With 18 years of experience,Jennifer Mermilliod, M.A., Principal is a highly
qualified professional who has directed many large-scale and complex projects and has a firm grasp on
the integration of preservation and planning. She has completed numerous projects ranging in size from a
single property to over 2000 parcels. As an expert in the field, Jennifer also presents professionally, is
widely published, and is highly regarded for her professional counsel and ability to balance multiple
interests in the management of extremely high-level, sensitive projects.
Reviewing Official: 2012 to present
March Joint Powers Authority
JMRC is contracted to act as Reviewing Official under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to March
Joint Powers Authority (MJPA) on behalf of the California State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) for
the preservation and disposition of MJPA historic properties located within March Field Historic District in
Riverside County, California.Duties include review, analysis, and consultation with MJPA, agencies, and
technical professionals regarding proposed undertakings to ensure compliance under the MOU.
Contract Historic Preservation Senior Planner: February 2016 to present
City of Riverside
JMRC is contracted to provide Historic Preservation Senior Planner services in the management of the
Historic Preservation Program. Responsibilities include preservation planning; consultation on local
ordinances, processes, and planning;management of large-scale surveys and projects; Native American
relationship development, AB 52 and SB 18 consultation,and monitoring oversight; case planning,
presentation, and staff support to Cultural Heritage Board and City Council; contractor management;
community workshop leadership; grant writing and management of grant-funded projects; preparation of
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-34
multi-media and educational material;historic research and evaluation;Section 106,CEQA, and Title 20
compliance coordination; review of technical studies and environmental documents; staff and outside
consultant oversight;and inter-departmental coordination at all levels.
Restored Show Historic Consultant:April 2016 to present
HGTV-DIY Network, Seasons 1-3
JMRC is contracted to the Restored Show,which airs on HGTV-DIY Network and features Inland Empire
properties.JMRC provides research and consultation to production staff,prepares historic reports,and
works with the production and directorial team to scout inspiration houses, locations, candidates, and to
film history beats. Jennifer Mermilliod serves as an on-film historian, providing on-camera
recommendations and dialogue with the show host regarding restoration work, local history, historic
preservation treatment, and property-specific construction, ownership, and use history.
Selected Projects
City of San Jacinto Downtown Specific Plan,San Jacinto, CA
Project Team Historic Consultant to DUKE CRM for Kimley-Horn and The Morse Planning Group
Project to develop a Downtown Specific Plan for the City of San Jacinto. Tasks included completion of the
cultural resources study, including citywide survey of 1,949 parcels within the 1,158-acre plan area,
development of historic context and themes to frame the city’s 100-year history,development of mitigation
and recommendations, as well as consultation and coordination to meet agency goals.
September 2016-July 2017
Citywide Street Light LED Conversion Project, Riverside, CA
Contract Senior Historic Preservation Planner, City of Riverside
Staff lead on project team for Riverside Public Utilities $900,000 project.Responsibilities include
assistance in program design; pre-bid direction,bid review,and consultant selection;direction and
oversight of survey work in historic districts, lead on entitlement process and CEQA compliance;
assistance in development of Draft Dark Skies Ordinance; and support for workshops and pilot programs.
2017-2018 (on-going)
City of Redlands Certified Local Government (CLG) Program, Redlands, CA
Project Historic Consultant to City of Redlands
Project included analysis and redevelopment of the city’s Historic Preservation Program with a focus on
development of a Certified Local Government (CLG) program. Responsibilities included identifying goals
and objectives, authoring and processing a CLG application with the State Office of Historic Preservation
on an accelerated project schedule to meet agency goals, and successfully secure access to $40,000
grant funding to implement a defined program goal to conduct a citywide survey in the first CLG year.
December 2015
Chicago/Linden Strategic Revitalization Plan,Riverside, CA
Project Team Historic Consultant to Terra Nova Planning & Research and Riverside Housing Authority
Project included the completion of a cultural resources survey of the strategic plan project area,general
consultation, and assistance in the development of the strategic plan.
July 2013
California Baptist University Specific Plan, Riverside, CA
Project Team Historic Consultant to California Baptist University
Project included the completion of a cultural resources survey of the specific plan project area, general
consultation, and assistance in the development of the specific plan as well as completion of Native
American consultation under SB 18.
June 2012
Old Town Plaza Project, San Jacinto, CA
Project Historic Consultant to Dave Leonard Associates for the Jimenez Initial Study
Cultural Resources Survey for CEQA Compliance
March 2011
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-35
Sean O’Malley
Managing Principal
Experience (selected domestic)
Confidential Mixed-Use and Residential Master
Plan, San Diego County, California
Riverwalk Master Plan, San Diego, California
Harmony Grove Master Plan, Escondido,
California
North River Farms Master Plan, San Diego
County
Santaluz Master Plan, San Diego County,
California
Chula Vista Bayfront Master Planning, Chula
Vista, California
ARTIC – Anaheim Regional Transportation
Intermodal Center, Anaheim, California
Aspen I at Rock Creek Master Plan, Sacramento,
California.
Butternut Creek Master Plan, Hillsboro, Oregon
Dana Point Harbor Waterfront and Commercial
Core, Dana Point, California
Edenborne Master Plan, Gonzales, Ascension
Parish, Louisiana
Lake Park at Rock Creek, Sacramento,
California. Teichert Construction. Stone Bridge
Properties, LLC.
Lincoln Master Plan, Whittier, California
Lusail Theatre District Master Plan Concept,
Doha, Qatar.
Mission Viejo Civic Center Core Vision Plan,
Mission Viejo, California
NASA Downey Redevelopment, Downey,
California.
Natomas North Precinct Master Plan,
Sacramento, California.
New Haven Master Plan, Ontario, California
Platinum Triangle Urban District, Anaheim,
California
Toscana Community Specific Plan Amendment,
Temescal Valley, California.
Rancho Mission Viejo PA-2 & PA-3 Master Plan
Orange County, California
Rouzan Community Plan & Landscape Concept,
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Shady Canyon Master Plan, Irvine, California
Victoria Gardens Retail Town Center, Rancho
Cucamonga, California
Walpert Ridge Specific Plan, Hayward,
California.
Waterside Master Plan, Woodlands, California.
Wineville Marketplace and Homes Master Plan,
Jurupa Valley, California.
Woodbine Master Plan, Toronto, California
Woodbridge Village Master Plan, Irvine,
California
Woodbury Master Plan, Irvine, California.
Sean O’Malley has over 30 years of experience in all aspects of the profession—including large-
scale planning and construction. As an urban designer, planner, and landscape architect, he has
implemented a unique approach to the design of cities, drawing upon the strength of site and
utilizing natural structures as a framework for development. He also has a depth of plant knowledge
(especially California indigenous plants), utilizing this skill as place-maker for award-winning
community-scale projects. He has worked in the US, Europe, China and other parts of the world.
Sean’s design interests are rooted in environmental infrastructure and the integration of the natural
structures of a site with its development potential; blurring the distinction between landscape and
architecture.
Some of his project highlights with SWA include leading the planning and design of Shunde New City
in China, which has involved numerous waterfront development plans incorporating transportation,
land use, and urban design strategies; multiple phased residential and commercial mixed-use
development projects for the Irvine Community Development and Mission Viejo Companies in
southern California; and numerous parks and open space planning and design concepts highlighting
open space, topography, and recreation in dense urban environments.
Office Location
Laguna Beach, California
Availability
10%
Registrations
Registered Landscape Architect:
California #3286
Arizona #63204
Colorado #805
New Mexico #460
Oregon #810
Wisconsin #607-014
Education
Master of Landscape Architecture
in Urban Design, Harvard University,
Graduate School of Design, Cambridge,
Massachusetts
Bachelor of Science, Landscape
Architecture, California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona, California
Professional Affiliations
Member, American Society of Landscape
Architects
Member, American Planning Association
Member, Urban Land Institute (ULI)
Council Member, ULI Global Exchange
Council
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-36
12 I SWA Qualifications
Education
Master of Architecture and Urban Design,
Washington University, St. Louis
Bachelor of Architecture, Center for
Environmental Planning and Technology
(CEPT), Ahmedabad, India
Registrations
AICP - American Institute of Certified
Planners
LEED Accredited Professional
Professional Affiliations/
Recognition
American Planning Association (APA)
Indian Institute of Architects (IIA)
Awards
2005 ASLA St. Louis Chapter Honor Award
- Emerson Grand Basin and Post Dispatch
Lake in Forest Park, St. Louis
2003 AIA Honor Award - Lafayette Square
Master Plan, St. Louis
1999 AIA Central States Chapter - Pagoda
Circle Master Plan, Forest Park, St. Louis
1998 AIA - Citation for Civic Benefit
“The Transformation and Rebirth of Grand
Basin”, Forest Park, St. Louis
SWA Experience
La via Mixed Use Master Plan, Scottsdale, Arizona
JDM Partners LLC. Master plan and public realm design for a 28 acre development.
Wigwam Resort & Downtown Litchfield Concept Plan, Litchfield
Park, Arizona
JDM Ref Transition. Conceptual master planning for a luxury resort town mixed-use
village.
3Roots Cantera Master Plan, San Diego, California
Lehigh Hanson. A new transit-oriented residential and mixed use community.
Buji River Urban Design Competition, Shenzhen, China
China Urban Planning & Design Institute of Shenzhen. Urban design and public realm
design for a mixed-use waterfront development.
Edenborne Master Plan, Ascension Parish, Louisiana
Edenborne Development Co. Planning, concept architecture and landscape design
for an innovation hub area, including mixed-use, light industrial, and R&D.
gateway Park, Irvine, California
Irvine Company. Landscape design for a 93-acre community park combining space
for sports, trails, and natural ecological park edges.
goraj Residential Development, Ahmadebad, India
Pacifica Companies. Master plan for a 252 acre eco friendly residential community.
heritage grove Community Master Plan, Clovis, California
Heritage Development, Inc. Master planning for a new academic village for the
neighboring community and state colleges.
Koh Kong Coastal Tourism Master Plan, Cambodia
UL Property Co., Ltd. Master planning for a world-class ecological and cultural
tourism resort city, creating districts including airport, residential villages,
entertainment, retreats and ecological preserves.
Mission viejo Civic Center Core vision Plan. City of Mission
viejo, California
Analysis and visioning for mixed use revitalization potential within a busy corridor.
North River Farms Master Plan, San Diego County, California
Integral Partners Funding, LLC. Community organized around agriculture and open
space tying neighborhoods to land and the food it produces.
Qiddiyah Master Plan Competition,
Dhaval Barbhaya, AICP, Assoc. Principal
PLANNER | URBAN DESIGN LEADER
Dhaval is an architect, planner and urban designer with over 16 years of
professional experience in leading and designing wide range of both local and
international projects. His work experience includes design and developments
of new towns and communities, mixed-use destinations, transit-oriented
development (TODs), urban revitalization projects, land reclamation projects,
special economic zone, industrial parks, streetscape corridors and greenways,
resorts and hospitality and campus planning. He has worked in the United States,
South America, China, India, Middle-East and many Southeast Asian countries.
Representative Projects:
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-37
SWA Qualifications I 13
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Land use and master planning
for a 334 km2 complex mega project positioned as a unique
regional and international entertainment, recreation and
lifestyle destination hub.
Red Sea Conceptual Master Plan Competition,
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Land use and master planning
for a 34,000 km2 luxurious tourist destination developed
around natural islands, waterfront, heritage and cultural
sites, natural reserves.
Riverwalk Eco Park Concept, San Diego,
California
Irvine Company. Conceptual planning to potentially repurpose
an existing river side property.
Riyadh Central District Redevelopment Plan,
Saudi Arabia
Jacobs Engineering. Conceptual open space and public realm
master plan for the central city.
Tata Eco City Master Plan, Bengaluru, India
Tata Housing Development Co. Master planning for a 192 acre,
net-zero residential, recreational and commercial develop-
ment.
Tata Residential Development, Bengaluru, India
Tata Housing Development Co. Landscape design for a 192
acre, net-zero residential, recreational and commercial
development.
Woodbine Master Plan, Toronto, Canada
Woodbine Entertainment Group. Live Work Learn Play. Master
planning for a new transit-oriented mixed mixed use district
centered around a racetrack.
Yangpyeong Mountain Resort, Yangpyeong, Korea
Hanwha Hotels and Resorts. Master planning for a mountain
resort community with five activity villages.
Previous Employer Experience - Americas
Chesterfield Downtown Development Plan, Chesterfield,
Missouri
St. Louis Downtown Redevelopment Plan, St. Louis Missouri
Chouteau Lake & Greenway Master Plan, St. Louis, Missouri
Lafayette Square Historic District Master Plan, St. Louis,
Missouri
St. Louis Gateway Mall Master Plan, St. Louis, Missouri
Forest Park Master Plan, Forest Park, St. Louis, Missouri
Grand Basin and Post-Dispatch Lake Master Plan, Forest Park,
St. Louis, Missouri
Pagoda Circle Master Plan, Forest Park, St. Louis, Missouri
St. Louis North Riverfront Business Corridor, St. Louis, Mis-
souri
Maryland Avenue Mixed-Use Development Master Plan, Clay-
ton, Missouri
Creve Couer Mixed-Use Town Center Master Plan, Creve
Couer, Missouri
Interstate 40/64 Corridor Master Plan, St. Louis, Missouri
WingHaven Master Plan, St. Louis, Missouri
Decatur Urban Corridors Plan Phase I & II, Decatur, Illinois
Aurora Riverfront Master Plan, Aurora, Illinois
Queen City Square Urban Design Plan, Cincinnati, Ohio
Stowers Institute Campus Master Plan, Kansas City, Missouri
EPA Office Building, Denver, Colorado
Columbia St. Mary’s Hospital Master Plan, Milwaukee, Wiscon-
sin
Moss Point Redevelopment Plan - Post Katrina Rebuilding
Effort, Gulf Coast, Mississippi
Punto - Central Master Plan, Monterrey, Mexico
Previous Employer Experience - Middle-East Region
Knowledge Economic City Master Plan Competition, Medina,
Saudi Arabia
Sanya “Blue Coast” Master Plan, Sanya, China
Karachi Port Trust Complex Master Plan, Karachi, Pakistan
Dubai Festival City Master Plan, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Dubai Marina Master Plan, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Al Jaddaf Master Plan Competition, Dubai, United Arab Emir-
ates
Istanbul Theme Park & Mixed-Use Development, Istanbul,
Turkey
Previous Employer Experience - Southeast Asia
KTB Resort + Theme Park Master Plan, Langkawi, Malaysia
Eco Marina Resort Master Plan, Penang, Malaysia
Morib Resort Town Master Plan, Morib, Malaysia
Eco World - Smart City Master Plan, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Penang South Bank Reclamation, Penang, Malaysia
Penang Middle Bank Reclamation, Penang, Malaysia
SM Land Reclamation , Manila Bay, Philippines
Thanh Da Island Master Plan, Ho Chih Minh, Vietnam
Litton Mill Redevelopment Master Plan, Manila, Philippines
Kwasa Damansara Town Center / TOD Master Plan, Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia
Filinvest City Master Plan, Manila, Philippines
Citta Di Mare Master Plan, Cebu, Philippines
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-38
Andrew Watkins, Principal
Project Manager & Urban Designer
Primary Contact
Office Location
Laguna Beach, California
Availability
50%
Registrations
Registered Architect
California #C34720
Education
Master of Architecture in Urban Design
Harvard University, Graduate School of
Design - 2010
Bachelor of Architecture, magna cum
laude, Syracuse University School of
Architecture - 2002
Professional Affiliations
Member, American Institute of Architects
Co-Chair of the ULI Orange County/Inland
Empire Young Leaders Group
2014 Pro Bono Technical Assistance Panel
ULI Sustainable Communities
Initiative Council
Andrew is an architect, planner and urban designer at SWA in Southern California, having over 12
years of professional experience. His current work focuses on large-scale urban design projects
that explore the confluence of ecology and urbanism. Andrew has been Project Manager for several
community plans on the west coast totaling over 3,500 acres and 15,000 dwelling units as well
as urban design and new city planning projects internationally. He is involved in local and national
projects having worked in the United States, China, Indonesia, India, South Africa, Botswana,
Ethiopia, Germany, Italy, and Mexico. Andrew has been with SWA since 2010 and was made an
Associate in 2011.
Experience (selected domestic)
Harmony Grove, Escondido, California. Kovach
Group of Companies. New Urban West, Inc.
Initial land planning services for due diligence
and master planning for a new rural village.
North River Farms Master Plan, San Diego
County, California. Integral Partners Funding,
LLC. Community organized around agriculture
and open space tying neighborhoods to land
and the food it produces.
Riverwalk Master Plan, San Diego County,
California. Irvine Company. Planning to
potentially repurpose an existing river side
property.
Butternut Creek Master Plan, Hillsboro,
Oregon. Hagg Lane LLC. A new connected and
green residential community within a unique
ecological setting.
Lake Forest General Plan Update, California. City
of Lake Forest. De Novo Planning. Urban design
and public realm for the general plan update.
Lake Park at Rock Creek TOD, Sacramento,
California. Stone Bridge Properties, LLC. Urban
design and site planning for the mixed-use town
center along Sacramento’s Gold Line.
Lincoln Master Plan, Whittier, California.
Brookfield Residential Properties, Inc. Mixed use
and open space urban infill development with
conceptual landscape design.
Mission Viejo Civic Center Core Vision Plan.
City of Mission Viejo, California. Analysis and
visioning for mixed use revitalization potential
within a busy corridor.
Natomas North Precinct Master Plan,
Sacramento, California. Natomas North
Precinct Landowners Group. 6,000 acre mixed
use community with diverse housing, a grand
promenade, and open space and trail system.
Rancho Mission Viejo PA-2 & PA-3 Master
Plan, South Orange County, California. RMV
Community Development LLC. Residential
communities consisting of three planning areas
within an operational ranch and agriculture with
civic center, regional sports park,pen space and
trails systems.
Rouzan Community Plan & Landscape Concept,
Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 2590 Associates LLC.
Master plan, landscape architecture and public
realm design of a mixed use center.
Toscana Community Specific Plan Amendment,
Temescal Valley, California. Forestar Toscana
LLC. Landscape master plan for a hillside
residential community.
West Hollywood West Neighborhood, West
Hollywood, California. City Of West Hollywood.
Urban design, planning, design guidelines and
public outreach for a residential neighborhood.
Whittier Uptown Streetscape Beautification,
Whittier, California. City of Whittier. Landscape
architecture and public outreach services for a
35 block city district.
Wineville Marketplace and Homes Master Plan,
Jurupa Valley, California. Chai/Russo. Master
plan and concept landscape and architecture
for a mixed use community.
Woodbine Master Plan, Toronto, Canada.
Woodbine Entertainment Group. Live Work Learn
Play. Master planning for a new transit-oriented
mixed mixed use district centered around a
racetrack.
Woodbridge Village Master Plan, Irvine,
California. Irvine Company. Master planning for
a 1,700 acre recreation-oriented community
centered around a lake.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-39
Daniel Dobson, Associate
Urban Designer
Office Location
Laguna Beach, California
Availability
50%
Education
Master of Architecture and Urban Design,
Columbia University, New York, New York
Bachelor of Science in Landscape
Architecture, Cum Laude, Ohio State
University, Columbus, Ohio
Professional Affiliations
Member, American Society of Landscape
Architects
Dan joined SWA in July 2015 as an urban and landscape designer. He is interested in how and why
cities hedge against risks through the landscape and what this will mean for built environments
in the future. He has experience working on master-planned communities, multi-family housing,
resorts and theme parks, academic and corporate campuses, and parks. Dan’s project highlights
include the master plan for the mixed-use Woodbine development in Toronto, Canada, and multiple
mixed-use and residential planning efforts incorporating land use and urban design strategies
located in the United States, India, and Qatar.
Experience (selected domestic)
Avenue of the Arts Hotel, Costa Mesa,
California. Arquitectonica. Landscape design
for upscale hotel with lobby and bar extending
out into the courtyard.
Cameron Residence, San Juan Capistrano,
California. Landscape design for a hillside
custom home.
Gateway Park, Irvine, California. Irvine
Company. Landscape design for a 93-acre
community park combining space for sports,
trails, and natural ecological park edges.
Goraj Residential Development, Ahmadebad,
India. Pacifica Companies. Master plan for a 252
acre eco friendly residential community.
Harmony Grove, Escondido, California. Kovach
Group of Companies. New Urban West, Inc.
Initial land planning services for due diligence
and master planning for a new rural village.
Lake Forest General Plan Update, Lake Forest,
California. City of Lake Forest. De Novo
Planning. Urban design and public realm for the
general plan update.
Lusail Theatre District Master Plan Concept,
Doha, Qatar. Supreme Committee. CityFi. Urban
design master plan for a 6.5 ha mixed-use
district.
Manhattan Village Shopping Center, Manhattan
Beach, California. Jones Lang LaSalle.
Landscape design for a 44 acre shopping and
entertainment destination center.
Mohawk Master Plan, Milton, Ontario, Canada.
Woodbine Entertainment Group. Master
planning for a 400 acre development on the
Mohawk Racetrack property.
Natomas North Precinct Master Plan,
Sacramento, California. Natomas North
Precinct Landowners Group. 6,000 acre
distinctive mixed use community with diverse
housing, a grand promenade, and open space
and trail system.
Newport Center Drive 600 Block, Newport
Beach, California. Irvine Company. Landscape
renovation for a four-tower business courtyard.
La Via Mixed Use Master Plan, Scottsdale,
Arizona. JDM Partners LLC. Master plan and
public realm design for a 28 acre development.
Ping Yuen Renovation, San Francisco, California.
China Town Community Development Center.
Landscape design improvements for a 5 acre,
four building housing development.
Rouzan Community Plan & Landscape Concept,
Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 2590 Associates LLC.
Master plan, landscape architecture and public
realm design of a mixed use center structured
around a village green.
Shenyang Huaqiang Golden Gallery, Shenyang,
China. Shenzhen Huaqiang New City
Development Co., Ltd. Landscape design for a
retail and restaurant promenade.
Toscana Community, Temescal Valley,
California. Forestar Toscana LLC. Landscape
master plan for a hillside residential community.
University of Cincinnati East Campus Planning,
Cincinnati, Ohio. University of Cincinnati.
Planning studies for the medical district of the
campus.
Woodbine Master Plan, Toronto, Canada.
Woodbine Entertainment Group. Live Work Learn
Play. Master planning for a new transit-oriented
mixed mixed use district centered around a
racetrack.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
A-40
Owner Resumes
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
APPENDIX B: PROJECT EXAMPLES
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
B-1City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND EIR | City of La Verne
De Novo Planning Group has recently kicked-off the City of La Verne's General Plan Update and EIR, expected to
be completed in late 2019. The La Verne General Plan Update will be based on a robust and meaningful engage-
ment process consisting of General Plan Advisory Committee meetings, Visioning Workshops, Community-wide
Workshops, a dedicated project website, newsletters, social media advertisements, and surveys. Since the City of La
Verne last updated their General Plan in 1998, there have been significant changes to the community that warrant a
special look as part of this General Plan Update, including extension of the Gold Line to the community, completion
of the I-210 extension, changes to demographics, and land use questions for the City's Sphere of Influence areas. De
Novo has teamed with Kittelson & Associates, EPS, and Cogstone on this project and the entire team looks forward
to preparing a General Plan grounded in the community's vision and values. The La Verne General Plan Website can
be viewed at: laverne.generalplan.org.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND EIR | City of Menifee
De Novo Principal Planner Amanda Tropiano completed the City of Meni-
fee’s first General Plan after the City’s incorporation in 2008 (the Plan was
adopted in December 2013). The Menifee General Plan, which is entire-
ly web-based, was specifically prepared to ensure it remains a long-term
roadmap for future development in an area with many competing inter-
ests and a lot of development potential.
Using the Riverside County Integrated Plan (RCIP) General Plan Land Use
map and associated goals and policies as a starting point, the consultant
team worked with Staff, the public, General Plan Advisory Committee, and
elected and appointed officials to make refinements to the land use plan
and General Plan goals and policies that are intended to implement Meni-
fee's Vision 2035. The work plan included preparing two optional elements
focused on Community Design and Economic Development, in addition
to the required mandatory components of a General Plan. The Plan pro-
posed identifying special economic development corridors where new
growth (residential and nonresidential) should be accommodated. Follow-
ing adoption of the General Plan, the City undertook an update to its Zon-
ing Code to create consistency between the City’s regulatory documents.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
B-2City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CODE UPDATE AND EIR | County of Colusa
De Novo Planning Group completed a full and comprehensive update to the Colusa County General Plan. De Novo
Project Managers Beth Thompson and Ben Ritchie served as the project managers for the Colusa County General
Plan and General Plan EIR, and Mr. McMurtry served as Principal Planner. This work effort included an extensive
public outreach and public participation program, a conservation plan for agriculture, open space, and wildlife, the
development of a county-wide GIS database, policy development in collabora-
tion with a Steering Committee, a full update to the County’s Housing Element,
and preparation of an EIR. Deliverables include a background report, Issues and
Opportunities Report, GIS database, four land use alternatives maps, the General
Plan policy document, Housing Element, and EIR. The updated General Plan
provides the County with a 20-30-year growth plan that balances the demand
for increased services, expanded opportunities for local residential and commer-
cial development, increased local employment opportunities, and preservation
of the rural lifestyle and extensive agricultural resources of the County.
The General Plan was successfully adopted and the EIR was certified by the
County Board of Supervisors in July 2012. The Board commended De Novo for
our excellent work on this project, and our team was invited back to Colusa
County to prepare a comprehensive update to the County’s Zoning Code. The
Colusa County General Plan Update Website can be viewed at: www.countyof-
colusageneralplan.org
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING CODE UPDATE AND EIR | City of Sebastopol
The De Novo team recently completed a comprehensive update to the Sebastopol General Plan. This work effort
included several community visioning workshops, numerous meetings and workshops with the Planning Commis-
sion and City Council, a detailed background report, issues and opportunities report, and full administrative drafts of
the EIR and General Plan. Preparation of a comprehensive update to the City’s Housing Element was also complet-
ed, and the Housing Element was successfully certified by HCD. The Final General Plan and EIR were successfully
adopted and certified by the City Council in December 2016, and our team was immediately invited back to pre-
pare a comprehensive update to the City’s Zoning Code, which is ongoing. The zoning districts have been revised,
and several new districts added, to be consistent with the land use designations in the General Plan. De Novo has
developed new provisions to address a range of topics and concerns, including modern industrial, commercial, and
office uses, mobile food trucks, special event noise standards and permits, beekeeping, parking, modern industrial,
commercial, and office uses, very small homes (tiny houses), and short-term vacation rentals (e.g., Airbnb, vrbo). The
Zoning Code Update includes two Planning Commission workshops, two community-wide Open Houses, and six
public meetings for consideration and adoption of the Zoning Code Update.
The Sebastopol General Plan Update Website can be viewed at: http://sebastopol.generalplan.org/
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
B-3City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND EIR | City of Brentwood
The De Novo team recently completed a comprehensive update to the
City of Brentwood’s General Plan and preparation of a General Plan EIR.
De Novo Principals Beth Thompson and Ben Ritchie served as the project
managers for the Brentwood General Plan and General Plan EIR, and Mr.
McMurtry served as Principal Planner. The work effort began with an exten-
sive public outreach and visioning process and preparation of a detailed
Existing Conditions Report. Other key tasks include an Opportunities and
Constraints Report, three Land Use Map Alternatives accompanied by a
Land Use Map Alternatives Report, and opportunities for property owners
to submit parcel change requests. Our team worked closely with the City’s
General Plan Working Group to complete comprehensive policy sets for all
General Plan topics.
The updated General Plan provides extensive opportunities for economic development, maintains strict fiscal sus-
tainability, enhances the preservation of natural resources in and around the City, and ensures continued quality in
the built environment under increasing growth pressure. Our team worked closely with our subconsultants through-
out all stages of this project. The General Plan was successfully adopted and the EIR was certified in July 2014. The
Brentwood General Plan Update Website can be viewed at: brentwood.generalplan.org/
P
RC ShadyWillowLaneS
h
a
d
y
W
illo
w
L
a
n
e
Lone Tree Way
Lone Tree P la z a D rEmpire Avenue
Minnesota Avenue
Apricot Way
Tremont Court
Capital DriveGreat Falls DriveAmber Lane
Mojave Drive
Grant StreetSungroveWayKohl's Dri
v
e
Tamalpais Ave
Old Sand Creek Road Jeffery WayHeidorn Ranch RoadCornell DriveS an d C r e e k
RC
R-HD
MUPT
R-MD
R-LD
PF
R-MDMUPT P
SCH
R-MD
R-VHD
PD
MUPT
RC
GC
SPF
R-HD
RC
P
P-OS
P
R-LD
Legend
Priority Area 1 Boundary
P - Park
P-OS - Permanent Open Space
GC - General Commercial
RC - Regional Commercial
PD - Planned Development
PF - Public Facility
SPF - Semi-Public Facility
R-LD - Residential-Low Density
R-MD - Residential-Medium Density
R-HD - Residential-High Density
R-VHD - Residential-Very High Density
MUPT - Mixed Use Pedestrian Transit
SCH - School
PRIORITY AREA 1 SPECIFIC PLAN
General Plan Land UseDesignations
Sources: City of Brentwood parcels, 11/9/2016; DMS parcel version 170425; Brentwood General Plan 2014; OpenStreets. Map date: April 25, 2017.CityofBrentwoodCityofAntiochUV4
Brentwood Station
Lone Tree Plaza
Streets of Brentwood
Aqueduct
Mokelumne Trail
P
P
General
Plan
Designation
Acres
within the
BPA-1
MUPT 256.58
P 5.23
PD 23.07
PF 0.99
R-VHD 8.98
RC 63.24
SPF 16.83
TOTAL 374.92
³0 500250
Feet
1:10,000
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND EIR | City of Campbell
The De Novo team is currently in the process of preparing a com-
prehensive General Plan Update, Climate Action Plan, Zoning Code
Update, and EIR for the City of Campbell. The General Plan Update
will include strategies to assist the City in broad-based economic
development opportunities which capitalize on the City's regional
location within Silicon Valley, while retaining the City's small-town
charm and family-oriented environment. The De Novo team is cur-
rently working in collaboration with the Campbell GPAC to review
the existing General Plan and to craft policies that will guide and
shape the City for the next 20 years. The Existing Conditions Re-
port and initial public outreach efforts have been completed, and
our team is currently drafting the Issues and Opportunities Report
and Land Use Alternatives Report.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND EIR | City of Lake Forest
De Novo Planning Group is currently preparing the City of Lake Forest General Plan Update. Three years after the City
incorporated in 1991, Lake Forest adopted its first General Plan to help guide the City’s physical development. Since
then, the City has undergone a number of significant changes including the annexations of Portola Hills and Foot-
hill Ranch, the closure of the El Toro Marine Corps Base, and the launch of the Opportunities Study Area. De Novo
is serving as the Prime Consultant and managing a robust community engagement program including one-one-
one interviews, community open houses, visioning workshops, General Plan Advisory Committee meetings, online
surveys and feedback tools, and social media campaign. The new General Plan will be based on the community's
vision and values and will guide the long-term growth and development in Lake Forest for the next 20 years.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
B-4City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND EIR | City of Milpitas
The City of Milpitas adopted its current General Plan in 1994. Since then, the General Plan was amended in 2002 to
incorporate the Midtown Specific Plan, in 2008 to include the Transit Area Plan, in 2010 to integrate the City’s Park
and Recreation Master Plan and Bikeway Maser Plan as well as to make minor revisions to update various exhibits,
tables, and figures to include land use changes and reflect changing conditions, and in 2015 to update the Hous-
ing Element. While the City has made various amendments to incorporate new planning documents, the city has
grown and changed significantly since the last comprehensive update to the General Plan in 1994. Additionally,
new laws affecting General Plans have been passed, new social and environmental issues have emerged, and new
planning strategies and practices have been developed.
These changes require a reevaluation of the existing General Plan and confirmation of the vision for Milpitas. The
update also brings the General Plan into compliance with new laws related to climate change, multimodal trans-
portation, and safety. This General Plan update looks ahead to the year 2040, making adjustments based on cur-
rent issues and emergent trends, and positioning the City of Milpitas for the next 20-25 years. The City of Milpitas
is committed to engaging community members, City staff, and decision-makers to produce a General Plan that is
up-to-date, forward thinking, clear and flexible, and fiscally viable.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND EIR | City of Westminster
De Novo Principal Planner Amanda Tropiano recently completed a comprehensive update to the City of Westmin-
ster’s General Plan and preparation of a General Plan EIR (note: this project was completed while Amanda was em-
ployed at another firm). Westminster’s General Plan recognizes the community’s past successes and proposes new
goals and policies (supported by implementation actions) to chart a prosperous
future. Through a robust dialogue with the Westminster community, including
its residents, business and property owners, and visitors, the City Council adopt-
ed the City’s first long-term Vision Statement which served as the touchstone
for the entire planning effort. The Plan’s policy framework will guide decisions
about future economic development projects and service priorities, capital im-
provements, and budgeting. Through adherence to the implementation plan,
Westminster will ensure that goals and policies of the general plan are sup-
ported by definite action, leading to measurable improvements in community
quality of life.
The updated General Plan provided extensive opportunities for multilingual
public engagement focused on connecting with stakeholders who are not typ-
ically involved in the public planning process. Amanda managed a 22-member
General Plan Advisory Committee, numerous public workshops and open hous-
es, pop-up booths at community events, and multiple study sessions and public
hearings. The General Plan was successfully adopted and the EIR was certified in
September 2016. The Westminster General Plan Update Website can be viewed at: westminstergp.org/
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
B-5City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update78 City of Montclair General Plan Update Proposal
De Novo Planning Group
CLIMATE ACTION PLANS AND SUSTAINABILITY PLANNING EXPERIENCE
Sustainability has been at the heart of all of our recent General Plan Updates. Sustainability is a broad
topic, which can be interpreted many ways by a city and community. Our approach has always centered
around the need to first establish a definition and understanding as to what sustainability means to the
community, and then crafting a comprehensive approach to achieve the community’s goals. Our recent
experience incorporating sustainability goals, policies, and actions into a General Plan include the Camp-
bell General Plan Update, EIR and Climate Action Plan, Elk Grove Sustainability Element and Climate
Action Plan EIR, the Sebastopol General Plan Update, the Cotati General Plan Update, the Brentwood
General Plan Update, and Foster City General Plan EIR and Climate Action Plan.
As described in greater detail below, our team has prepared Climate Action Plans as stand-alone projects
and as part of General Plan Updates. Our Project Manager, Ben Ritchie, has give several presentations,
in partnership with the Attorney General’s Office, at statewide and national planning conferences about
how communities can integrate Climate Action Plans into the General Plan Update process. We strongly
commend the City for initiating the preparation of a CAP concurrent with the General Plan Update, and
we feel that this approach will be very effective at not only reducing locally-generated GHG emissions,
but also in developing a sustainability approach that is complimentary to the broader vision and goals
established by the General Plan. The issues and topics surrounding Sustainability will be interwoven
throughout all elements of the General Plan Update. The development of a new stand-alone Green Plan
Element will provide the City with a direct link and implementation strategy between the General Plan
and the CAP. Below are samples of our experience working with these special topics.
GENERAL PLAN EIR AND CLIMATE ACTION PLAN | City of Forest City
De Novo is recently completed the Foster City General Plan EIR and Climate Action Plan. The project was
being managed by De Novo Principal, Ben Ritchie. The Draft EIR addressed the full range of environmen-
tal impacts associated with implementation of the City’s updated Land Use and Circulation Element,
as well as the revised General Plan Land Use Map and new Climate Action Plan. The Climate Action
Plan was developed in a way that will facilitate General Plan implementation, provide opportunities for
streamlined CEQA review of subsequent development projects, and effectively implements the City’s
visions and goals with respect to climate change planning.
SUSTAINABILITY ELEMENT AND CLIMATE ACTION PLAN EIR | City of Elk Grove
De Novo prepared the Environmental Impact Report for the City’s General Plan Sustainability Element
and Climate Action Plan as a Supplement to the General Plan EIR. The Sustainability Element and CAP
project involved adoption of the Sustainability Element, which included goals and policies to help the
City achieve a wide range of desired results related to sustainability, and the CAP, which included a range
of measures to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from a variety of sources throughout the City.
The Supplemental EIR provided a mechanism for subsequent projects to streamline analysis of impacts,
including cumulative impacts associated with greenhouse gases, as allowed under CEQA Guidelines
§§15168, 15183, and 15183.5
79City of Montclair General Plan Update Proposal
De Novo Planning Group
CLIMATE ACTION PLAN WORK PROGRAM AND GP IMPLEMENTATION | City of San Carlos
Prior to founding De Novo Planning Group, Mr. Ritchie worked closely with the City of San Carlos to develop
a cutting edge work program for the development of a CAP concurrent with the City’s General Plan Up-
date. Mr. Ritchie developed an original methodology that met the unique needs of the City, and resulted
in the preparation of a CAP that was fully integrated into the City’s GPU and was fully addressed in the GP
EIR. Integration of these two documents provides the City and future developers with a legally defensible
and easy-to-understand toolkit for determining the GHG requirements of individual projects. This original
approach has been reviewed and endorsed by the Attorney General’s office, and Mr. Ritchie has since part-
nered with the AG’s lead climate change attorneys to present the approach and methodology to national
and international audiences of professional planners and developers. The San Carlos CAP received the 2009
Outstanding Planning Award of Merit in the Category of Innovation in Green Community Planning from the
Northern California Chapter of the American Planning Association (APA).
CLIMATE ACTION PLAN | City of Alameda
Mr. Ritchie served as the co-project manager for the preparation of the City of Alameda’s first CAP in 2007-
2008. In this capacity, Mr. Ritchie worked to develop a comprehensive CAP, which included a baseline emis-
sions inventory, a target reduction goal, a detailed set of GHG reductions measures, and an implementation
and monitoring program for the CAP. Mr. Ritchie worked with City staff to develop detailed assumptions
regarding the effectiveness and timing for implementation of the various GHG reductions measures, and
utilized ICLEI’s CACP modeling software to quantify the anticipated volume of GHG reductions associated
with each of the measures included in the CAP. A copy of the Final CAP is available for review online at:
http://www.cityofalamedaca.gov/Go-Green/. The 2008 City of Alameda Climate Action Plan received the
Northern California APA Award of Merit for excellence in local sustainability planning in 2008.
CLIMATE ACTION PLAN BASELINE EMISSIONS INVENTORY | City of Pinole
Mr. Ritchie served as the project manager for the team responsible for preparing the CAP for the City of
Pinole. At the onset of this project, no municipal or community GHG emissions inventory data had been
collected previously. Mr. Ritchie developed and organized an effort to engage a wide range of City depart-
ments and community service providers to gather baseline emissions data in a streamlined and efficient
manner that was not only effective, but respectful of the time and resource constraints of all those involved.
This approach included easy-to-use worksheets, tips for department heads regarding data collection sourc-
es, and a brief narrative explaining the intent and use of the data. Mr. Ritchie provided routine follow up and
assistance as-needed to those charged with collecting data from internal City operations. The result was a
thorough and comprehensive baseline GHG emissions inventory that laid the foundation for a comprehen-
sive CAP and quantification of the effectiveness of the CAP measures.
CLIMATE ACTION PLAN | City of Pleasanton
De Novo Associate Planner Josh Smith prepared the City of Pleasanton Climate Action Plan, adopt-
ed in February 2012. Josh refined the City’s GHG inventory and 2020 emissions projection, developed
and quantified emissions reduction measures, prioritized measures for implementation, and designed a
monitoring program. The CAP helps the City to prepare for the expected impacts of climate change, in-
cluding higher temperatures, extreme weather events, and water supply uncertainty. The plan also meets
the requirements of a “qualified” Climate Action Plan per the BAAQMD draft guidelines, and was herald-
ed as “best in class” by the BAAQMD. The City of Pleasanton was also awarded a Beacon award from the
Institute for Local Government (ILG) for its commitment to reducing GHG emissions.
78 City of Montclair General Plan Update Proposal
De Novo Planning Group
CLIMATE ACTION PLANS AND SUSTAINABILITY PLANNING EXPERIENCE Sustainability has been at the heart of all of our recent General Plan Updates. Sustainability is a broad topic, which can be interpreted many ways by a city and community. Our approach has always centered around the need to first establish a definition and understanding as to what sustainability means to the community, and then crafting a comprehensive approach to achieve the community’s goals. Our recent experience incorporating sustainability goals, policies, and actions into a General Plan include the Camp-bell General Plan Update, EIR and Climate Action Plan, Elk Grove Sustainability Element and Climate Action Plan EIR, the Sebastopol General Plan Update, the Cotati General Plan Update, the Brentwood General Plan Update, and Foster City General Plan EIR and Climate Action Plan. As described in greater detail below, our team has prepared Climate Action Plans as stand-alone projects and as part of General Plan Updates. Our Project Manager, Ben Ritchie, has give several presentations, in partnership with the Attorney General’s Office, at statewide and national planning conferences about how communities can integrate Climate Action Plans into the General Plan Update process. We strongly commend the City for initiating the preparation of a CAP concurrent with the General Plan Update, and we feel that this approach will be very effective at not only reducing locally-generated GHG emissions,
but also in developing a sustainability approach that is complimentary to the broader vision and goals
established by the General Plan. The issues and topics surrounding Sustainability will be interwoven
throughout all elements of the General Plan Update. The development of a new stand-alone Green Plan
Element will provide the City with a direct link and implementation strategy between the General Plan
and the CAP. Below are samples of our experience working with these special topics.
GENERAL PLAN EIR AND CLIMATE ACTION PLAN | City of Forest City
De Novo is recently completed the Foster City General Plan EIR and Climate Action Plan. The project was
being managed by De Novo Principal, Ben Ritchie. The Draft EIR addressed the full range of environmen-
tal impacts associated with implementation of the City’s updated Land Use and Circulation Element,
as well as the revised General Plan Land Use Map and new Climate Action Plan. The Climate Action
Plan was developed in a way that will facilitate General Plan implementation, provide opportunities for
streamlined CEQA review of subsequent development projects, and effectively implements the City’s
visions and goals with respect to climate change planning.
SUSTAINABILITY ELEMENT AND CLIMATE ACTION PLAN EIR | City of Elk Grove
De Novo prepared the Environmental Impact Report for the City’s General Plan Sustainability Element
and Climate Action Plan as a Supplement to the General Plan EIR. The Sustainability Element and CAP
project involved adoption of the Sustainability Element, which included goals and policies to help the
City achieve a wide range of desired results related to sustainability, and the CAP, which included a range
of measures to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from a variety of sources throughout the City.
The Supplemental EIR provided a mechanism for subsequent projects to streamline analysis of impacts,
including cumulative impacts associated with greenhouse gases, as allowed under CEQA Guidelines
§§15168, 15183, and 15183.5
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
B-6
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE |
City of Palm Desert
De Novo Senior Urban Design Martti Eckert recently partici-
pated in the comprehensive update of the City of Palm Desert
Zoning Code. The update established consistency between the
code and the City’s General Plan, addressed the document’s
antiquated approaches and provisions, and established consis-
tency among the many amendments that had previously been
made to the document to address special issues. The update
enhances the readability and user friendliness of the ordinance
through the use of streamlining procedures and the inclusion
of numerous graphics and tables, while maintaining the code’s
more functional components. The update also includes new
zoning designations and development standards, as informed
by General Plan policy.
The Palm Desert Zoning Code Website can be viewed at: www.
cityofpalmdesert.org/departments/planning/zoning
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE | City of Rancho Cucamonga
De Novo Senior Urban Designer Martti Eckert recently participated in the comprehensive update of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. The update implemented the City’s newly updated General Plan, made
the code more user-friendly, and incorporated contemporary best practice regulations into the document. Specif-
ic tasks included text and map amendments to add mixed-use districts, simplify regulations for special planning
areas, incorporate green building code provisions, improve site planning standards, update special use regulations
consistent with state law and best practices, streamline permit processes, and update sign regulations. The code
was also substantially reorganized, making the document more intuitive to read. The Rancho Cucamonga Develop-
ment Code Website can be viewed at: www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/planning/zoning.asp
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE | City of Rancho Cordova
De Novo Senior Urban Designer Martti Eckert recently contributed to the development of the first zoning code for
the recently incorporated City of Rancho Cordova. The code implements the City’s General Plan and replaces the
Sacramento County Municipal Code land use regulations that were originally enacted by the City with a document
tailored to the community’s unique characteristics and vision. The Zoning Code was developed in close collabo-
ration with City staff and is intended to help transform the community’s aging, suburban built environment into a
more vital, better-connected development pattern that creates a strong sense of place. To achieve this vision, while
protecting the community’s identity and property values, the document incorporates the following innovative fea-
tures:
»Contemporary zoning approaches, including form-based standards to better perpetuate new community
center locations throughout the city;
»Streamlined administrative procedures that are effective and easy to implement;
»A user-friendly organization that presents information in a clear and concise manner;
»The use of mixed-use districts that encourage flexibility; and
»The advent of a Web-based interactive zoning code that unites the zoning map with zoning text information.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
B-7
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 1 C:\Users\Amanda
Tropiano\Documents\2_Proposals\2018_CityOfSanJacintoGPU\!Economics_EPS\EPS Quals_SanJacintov2.docx
City of Ceres General Plan Update
Ceres, California
Last updated 20 years ago, the City of Ceres’ General Plan required updating to better reflect the
medium- to long-term growth opportunities in the City. EPS was retained as a subconsultant to
Dyett & Bhatia (D&B) to support the City’s General Plan Update process. The City was particularly
focused on understanding appropriate opportunities for industrial development and understanding
the implications of various locations for new retail in the City (e.g., retail with highway frontage
versus in the Downtown area). EPS’s role was to evaluate the economic, real estate, and fiscal
conditions and trends that will shape the City’s overall land use planning with respect to the type
of development and land uses in the City during the next 20 to 30 years. An evaluation of the
City’s fiscal conditions and the fiscal implications of land use decisions were provided as well to
provide a context for how General Plan polices related to land use and public service standards
might affect the City’s General Fund revenues and costs. The General Plan Update was adopted in
May 2018.
City of Turlock General Plan Update
Turlock, California
EPS was retained as part of the Consultant Team to provide economic, fiscal, and public finance
services related to the City of Turlock’s 2030 General Plan. Since the early 1990s, the City has
served as a key growth center in Stanislaus County, and has worked to attract and accommodate
growth by placing regional retail centers along Interstate 5, approving a series of large-scale
master-planned communities, and planning for major industrial growth through development of
improved and unimproved industrial areas. The goal of the 2030 General Plan process was to
revisit the City’s desire and strategy for continued growth—in particular, the extent of infill growth
that could occur, as well as the most appropriate new areas for growth if needed beyond infill
capacity. EPS prepared demographic and employment projections, analyzed local economic and
real estate conditions, and helped to characterize the amount of residential, retail, office, and
industrial development the City should plan for to accommodate growth over the planning horizon.
EPS also conducted a fiscal analysis of the proposed and alternative land use plans, providing an
understanding of the ongoing service costs associated with varying growth patterns and volumes;
a public facilities financing plan, describing the funding sources to provide infrastructure required
to support planned growth, and an updated public facilities fee program, estimating the costs
imposed on new development over time; and developed recommended economic development
goals and policies that were ultimately incorporated into an Economic Development Element,
designed to highlight the City of Turlock's intended direction and vision regarding the economic
stability and growth for the General Plan period.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
B-8
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 3C:\Users\Amanda Tropiano\Documents\2_Proposals\2018_CityOfFountainValley_GPU\EPS\184021FountainValley
City of Lake Forest General Plan Update Lake Forest, California The City of Lake Forest, in the area of Orange County commonly referred to as the Saddleback Valley, is currently updating its General Plan. Incorporated in 1991, the City has since matured and is moving beyond large-scale tract development to maintenance, preservation, and renewal activities that serve
to improve quality of residential, business, and recreational environments. As part of a
multidisciplinary team, EPS is tasked identifying long-term economic and how they might be
harnessed to support desired land use and fiscal outcomes. After preparing a baseline analysis of
socio-economic, real estate, and fiscal trend, EPS is currently helping the consultant team craft land
use alternatives that include appropriate and balanced mix of uses and strategic increases in intensity
in key growth areas.
City of Palo Alto Downtown Evaluation and Comprehensive Plan
Palo Alto, California
In recent years, issues related to real estate development and growth
have come to a head in Palo Alto. The City has been grappling with
congestion and change, and has responded with keen attention to the
implications of land use planning on local quality of life. The City has
been particularly concerned about the evolution of its downtown,
which has attracted a multitude of high technology tenants and new
development activity in recent years. In addition, the City has
commenced its Comprehensive Plan Update process and has been
studying potential future growth scenarios for the city as a whole, as
well as the fiscal implications of those scenarios.
EPS has been actively engaged with the City of Palo Alto on
downtown and citywide urban planning initiatives for the past two
years. In 2013, the City hired EPS to conduct a study of downtown
office development trends and future potential, to inform the City’s
review of its downtown development cap policy. EPS studied recent
redevelopment projects in the downtown and evaluated the potential
for similar projects to occur in the future. EPS found that office valuations are high enough to support
significant redevelopment in the downtown, particularly if additional density is granted. EPS also is
evaluating retail in the downtown, as part of a follow-on engagement that seeks to evaluate tenant
displacement in the downtown.
EPS also is assisting the City with a fiscal analysis of Comprehensive Plan alternatives. In particular,
EPS is responding to City concerns that employment-supporting land uses fail to contribute sufficient
fiscal resources to the City, leaving residents to subsidize services. EPS is working closely with the
City’s Planning & Community Environment Department and the Administrative Services Department to
analyze City revenues and cost by land use. When complete, it is anticipated that the EPS analysis
will be a valuable resource that informs citywide discussions about the Comprehensive Plan.
Through both of these consulting engagements with the City of Palo Alto, EPS is helping the City to
navigate sensitive issues of population and employment growth. Through the carefully developed
assessments of real estate and municipal finance, EPS is delivering data and sound technical work that
illuminates the essential economic factors affecting their community’s built form and the City’s fiscal
sustainability.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
B-9
EPS Qualifications for City of Sausalito General Plan Update
10/24/16
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 4C:\Users\Amanda Tropiano\Documents\2_Proposals\2018_CityOfFountainValley_GPU\EPS\184021FountainValley
San Clemente General Plan Update
San Clemente, California
Located along the coast in Orange County, halfway between Los Angeles and San Diego, San
Clemente is an attractive and rapidly growing beach city. The Downtown area features an active main
street area, a district of Spanish Colonial Revival architecture, and neighborhoods with rapidly
escalating housing prices. El Camino Real—California’s famous pre-freeway travel route—also runs
through Downtown San Clemente. In addition, the City maintains a number of other distinct
commercial districts, industrial areas, and cohesive residential communities.
EPS assisted the City of San Clemente by providing economic analysis and recommendations to
support a visioning process being conducted as part of the General Plan update. The primary purpose
of the EPS analysis was to inform, in broad terms, the City’s overall economic development strategy
with respect to the type of development and land use that could be effectively targeted at several
targeted growth areas in the City. Based on its analysis, EPS developed a series of recommendations
and implementation strategies to (1) develop a destination tourist/retail project or cluster to target
consumers from outside the City as well as attract tenants in the retail categories currently
experiencing significant “leakage,” (2) help the City capture an increased share or regional job growth
through enhanced utilization of existing properties/developed sites, and (3) cultivate business clusters
focused on action sports, leisure, and recreation with strategic marketing and “branding” initiatives.
The City Council adopted a Downtown Strategic Plan that incorporated the EPS findings and
subsequently issued several Requests for Qualifications (RFQs) to developers for key opportunity sites
identified in the Plan.
City of Fresno General Plan Implementation Study
City of Fresno, California
EPS participated as part of a multi-disciplinary team led by the Renaissance Group to develop
strategies and measures designed to implement the City of Fresno’s recently approved General
Plan. The study effort was funded through U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) Strong
Cities, Strong Communities (SC2) initiative, which seeks to strengthen the capacity of local
governments to develop and execute their economic vision and strategies by providing technical
assistance and access to federal agency expertise, and creating new public and private sector
partnerships.
The EPS role focused on identifying and evaluating the feasibility of various financing mechanisms to
cover the cost of the public services and facilities needed to support in-fill development and revitalize
existing neighborhoods. EPS developed an initial list of financing options and techniques based on
input from the project Task Force, supplemented by additional research and the professional
knowledge from the consultant team. EPS described the key elements of each identified financing
option and the corresponding implementation process. In addition, EPS reviewed each option or
technique based on a variety of criteria critical to their applicability, including but not limited to: ease
of implementation and administration (e.g., legal, institutional, collection/enforcement mechanisms,
etc.); applicability to Fresno, especially at in-fill locations; potential revenue generation (e.g. amount,
timing, leverage, applicability); funding stability and/or security (e.g., dedicated or discretionary,
affected by business cycle); probability of success (e.g. stakeholder support); and potential impact on
development feasibility and/or economic competitiveness (e.g., relative costs, incidence/equity).
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
B-10
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE/EIR
La Verne, CA
Kittelson is currently developing the circulation and mobility section of the General Plan Update for the City
of La Verne, including the identification of mobility-related policies and objectives with respect to
automobile, active transportation, transit and freight circulation, plus on-street and off-street parking.
Kittelson has conducted visioning outreach (such as interactive mapping and roadway cross-section
activities at public workshops) to obtain feedback on residents’ preferred future roadway characteristics.
Kittelson is also working with the land use and economic planning teams to estimate the net-new travel
demand that would result from different land use alternatives, including emphasis on land uses and
development types.
In addition, Kittelson is preparing the transportation analyses in support of the General Plan Update EIR. For
this effort, Kittelson is conducting existing conditions assessments and using the Southern California
Association of Governments (SCAG) regional travel demand model to estimate travel forecasts for
cumulative conditions for the Proposed Plan. The study will also investigate the potential impacts at key
intersections and freeway segments, and changes to the circulation network for transit and active
transportation users. Kittelson will also prepare VMT projections to comply with SB 743 requirements.
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE/EIR
Lake Forest, CA
To plan for future growth and development, the City of Lake Forest is looking to create a 2040 General Plan
Update that addresses land use, transportation, housing, and other major topics. Kittelson recently
completed an existing conditions assessment of transportation in the City, utilizing infographics as part of the
documentation to easily convey data. Kittelson is currently creating the circulation and mobility section of
the General Plan Update, including the identification of existing and future needs for circulation, active
transportation, parking, transit, and goods movement networks. Kittelson has conducted interactive visioning
outreach workshops to obtain feedback on stakeholders’ preferred future roadway characteristics. In
addition, specific goals and policies are being created to address future transportation changes, such as
connected/autonomous vehicles would affect livability and how the change in transportation evaluation
metrics (from LOS to VMT) may affect the transportation planning and mitigation process.
To supplement the General Plan Update, an environmental document (EIR) will be prepared. Kittelson
conducted the required transportation analysis for the EIR document, including the identification of impacts
resulting from the proposed change in land uses and effects of new policies/objectives. Future background
conditions and the travel demand associated with the Plan will be developed using the City’s own travel
demand model, which is a subset of the overall Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) model.
SYSTEMIC SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (SSAR)
Hemet, CA
Kittelson is supporting the City of Hemet in implementing a Systemic Safety Analysis Report (SSAR) to identify
the highest priority safety projects throughout the City. Kittelson led the citywide crash analysis and safety
performance network screening to identify the highest priority crash types as well as the intersection and
corridor segments most likely to benefit from safety improvements. Following this crash analysis, Kittelson
developed a safety toolbox for the City of Hemet that identified countermeasures most likely to be effective
given the city’s crash patterns and trends. This countermeasure toolbox is being used to develop site-specific
safety projects for the City and Kittelson will support the City in the development of its final SSAR.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
B-11
San Jacinto General Plan Update 1
Riverside Northside Specific Plan
City of Riverside
The community involvement program for the Northside Specific Plan project, led by Kearns & West, is
based on objectives for broad participation by the diverse communities in the Northside, transparency,
and integration with previous neighborhood visioning. The multi-pronged program includes traditional
engagement methods, including a series of community workshops, balanced with other methods to
involve community members that are underrepresented. This includes interactive activities at existing
community events, partnerships with local organizations online surveys in both English and Spanish, an
interactive website, and open houses that facilitate a direct conversation between community members
and City staff.
Mission Viejo Core Area Specific Plan
City of Mission Viejo
The Kearns & West team led the public involvement program for an exciting visioning process in the City
of Mission Viejo. The City Council charged the team with involving the cross-section of Mission Viejo
communities in exploring possibilities for new places, experiences and changes in the central civic and
commercial core. Working closely with the team urban designers and economists, the Kearns & West
team supported popup outreach, community workshops, website and social media, citywide survey, and
youth workshops.
Community Plans Continuum Project
County of San Bernardino
Prior to joining Kearns & West, Jenna Tourje was responsible for managing six community plans in San
Bernardino County as part of the larger community planning effort. In addition, she was responsible for
leading the Health Technical Team. As part of the countywide planning process, Jenna helped lead the
development of community plans for 26 unincorporated communities. Communities range from the San
Bernardino Mountains to the Mojave Desert. The project included intensive immersion weeks where
multiple facilitations teams are immersed in each community conducting collaborative public workshops.
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
B-12
Duke culturAl resources MAnAgeMent
9/26/2018 (P:\Riverside County\San Jacinto General Plan Update, 2018\Duke CRM SOQ SJGP.docx) 4
De a n M . Du ry e a , Jr., Arc h e olog i s t/F i e ld Di re c tor Mr. Duryea is an Archaeologist with DUKE CRM. He meets the Secretary of Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for Prehistoric and Historical Archaeology. He has over 10 years of professional archaeological experience. He received his B.A. in Anthropology in 2004 from the University of Arizona, and his M.A. in Anthropology in 2011 from Northern Arizona University. Mr. Duryea is a Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA No. 989466). He has experience working for both the private and public sectors completing numerous consulting and compliance projects. He has experience with NEPA, CEQA, NHPA, and ARPA. He has acted as field director and manager, and has extensive experience in surveying, site recording and inventory, construction monitoring, site testing and evaluation, site excavation and data recovery, data management, database creation and management, report and field form archiving and curation, and GIS mapping and database management. S a ra h N a va , B .A., Arc h a e ol og i s t/GI S Sp e c i a li s t
Ms. Nava is an Archaeologist and GIS Specialist for DUKE CRM. She received her B.A. in
Anthropology from California State University, Long Beach in 2008 and a GIS certification in 2014.
She specializes in using geographic information systems for archaeological and environmental spatial
analysis. Her area of expertise is in data collection in the field and statistical and cartographic post-
processing. She has over 7 years of lab and field experience in archaeology and GIS and is also cross-
trained in paleontology. Her involvement in cultural resource management spans all of California with
concentrations on the coast, Channel Islands, and southern California desert regions.
Relevant Projects and References
Together, our team has extensive experience conducting cultural and paleontological resource services
on Specific Plans and EIRs in the area:
S a n J a c i n to Down town S p e c i fi c P l a n , S a n J a c i nt o, 2016-17
Client: Kimley-Horn/City of San Jacinto. DUKE CRM conducted a cultural resources assessment for
the 1,158-acre San Jacinto Downtown Specific Plan. The cultural resources assessment included a
record search, archival research, a reconnaissance survey for both archaeological and historic
resources, preparation of a historic context, and Native American consultation support for the City’s
AB-52 and SB-18 requirements. DUKE CRM included Jennifer Mermilliod as our Project Historian.
Working with the City and the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians DUKE CRM scoped out a cultural
landscape effort that would be implemented in the future as part of implementation of the Specific
Plan or possibly the City’s General Plan. This work was completed in compliance with CEQA. Cultural
Resource Assessment. P roj e c t R e fe re n c e : Da vi d L e on a rd , C on tra c t P l a n n e r, C i ty of S a n J a c i n to,
1770 I ow a Ave n u e , Su i te 100, R i ve rs i d e , C A 92507, P h on e : (951) 782-9868, E m a i l:
le on a rd d la @e a rth li n k .n e t
Di a m on d Va lle y E s ta te s Sp e c i fi c P la n , H e m e t, 2017-P re s e n t
Client: Diamond Valley Development, CASC. DUKE CRM is providing cultural and paleontological
resources services for the Diamond Valley Estates Specific Plan (DVE) located south of Hemet, in
Riverside County. The DVE project, was split into a Specific Plan (395 acres) and a Tentative Tract
Map (TTM, 23 acres). Our research and field survey identified 27 cultural resources within the project.
Fourteen of the resources are not eligible for the NRHP/CRHR while 13 are considered potentially
eligible; Phase II excavation is recommended to make formal determinations of eligibility. One of
these resources is a very large village site (43 acres) with hundreds of bedrock milling slicks and
mortars, multiple artifact scatters, midden soil, cupules, and much more. In addition, through
consultation with local Tribes, we identified that the project is located within a potential ethnographic
cultural landscape. This project has involved extensive consultation with local Tribes and the County
Duke culturAl resources MAnAgeMent
9/26/2018 (P:\Riverside County\San Jacinto General Plan Update, 2018\Duke CRM SOQ SJGP.docx) 5
of Riverside, and we are preparing to begin an ethnographic cultural landscape study. Due to the
complexity and high sensitivity for archaeological sites within DVE, DUKE CRM has brought in
multiple subconsultants to assist with this project (geoarchaeologist, ethnographer, and
ethnobotanist). Our team recently completed buried sites testing on the TTM project and is preparing
to conduct further buried sites testing in the Specific Plan area. P roj e c t R e fe re n c e : Ad a m R u s h ,
AI C P , Di re c tor of P l a n n i n g , C AS C E n g i n e e ri n g & C on s u l ti n g , I n c ., 1470 C ool e y Dri ve ,
C ol ton , C A 92324, (855) 383-0101 X 5370, E m a i l : a ru s h @c a s c i n c .c om .
M i d C ou n ty P a rk w a y (M C P ), Sa n J a c i n to t o C oron a , R i ve rs i d e C ou n t y , C A, 2004-2011
Client: RCTC. Mr. Duke was the cultural resources task manager for the MCP project. Under Mr.
Duke’s direction the following Caltrans documents were prepared: an ASR, XPI Report, Phase II
report, HRER, ESA Action Plan, HPSR, and FOE. This project involved extensive consultation with
multiple Native American groups, SHPO, and the ACHP. Mr. Duke worked closely with Caltrans
archaeologists, historians, and the Native American Coordinator, as well as RCTC, Caltrans, and
FHWA staff. P roj e c t R e fe re n c e : C a th y B e c h te l , P roj e c t De ve l op m e n t Di re c tor, R i ve rs i d e
C ou n ty T ra n s p orta ti on C om m i s s i on , 4080 L e m on S tre e t, 3rd F l oor, R i ve rs i d e , C A 92502, (951)
787-7141, (951) 787-7920, c b e c h te l @rc tc .org .
E a s t L a k e S p e c i fi c P l a n , L a k e E l s i n ore , 2016-2017
Client: VCS Environmental/City of Lake Elsinore. DUKE CRM conducted a cultural resources
assessment for the 3,000-acre East Lake Specific Plan. The cultural resources assessment included a
record search, archival research, a reconnaissance survey for archaeological resources, and Native
American consultation support for the City’s AB-52 and SB-18 requirements. Twenty-two cultural
resources are known to exist within the Specific Plan area, one of which is a Traditional Cultural
Property (TCP), Lake Elsinore itself (Primary No. 33-11009). Through consultation with the Pechanga
Band of Luiseño Indians it was determined that while this resource is a sacred and significant Tribal
Cultural Resource (TCR). This work was completed in compliance with CEQA. P roj e c t R e fe re n c e :
J u l i e B e e m a n Va n d e rm os t, P re s i d e n t, VC S E n vi ron m e n ta l , I n c ., 30900 R a n c h o Vi e j o R oa d ,
S u i te 100, S a n J u a n C a p i s tra n o, C A 92675, Di re c t Di a l : (949) 234-6070, E m a i l :
J b e e m a n @vc s e n vi ron m e n ta l .c om
HOURLY BILLING RATES
Staff Level Hourly Billing Rate
President/Principal Archaeologist $ 170
Administrator $ 130
Principal Investigator $ 120
Senior Historian/Architectural Historian $ 125
Archaeologist $ 110
Paleontologist $ 110
Field/Laboratory Director $ 110
GIS Specialist $ 95
Field/Laboratory Crew Chief $ 90
Field/Laboratory Crew $ 70
Research Assistant $ 70
Administrative Assistant $ 65
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
B-13
Duke culturAl resources MAnAgeMent
9/26/2018 (P:\Riverside County\San Jacinto General Plan Update, 2018\Duke CRM SOQ SJGP.docx) 5
of Riverside, and we are preparing to begin an ethnographic cultural landscape study. Due to the
complexity and high sensitivity for archaeological sites within DVE, DUKE CRM has brought in
multiple subconsultants to assist with this project (geoarchaeologist, ethnographer, and
ethnobotanist). Our team recently completed buried sites testing on the TTM project and is preparing
to conduct further buried sites testing in the Specific Plan area. P roj e c t R e fe re n c e : Ad a m R u s h ,
AI C P , Di re c tor of P l a n n i n g , C AS C E n g i n e e ri n g & C on s u l ti n g , I n c ., 1470 C ool e y Dri ve ,
C ol ton , C A 92324, (855) 383-0101 X 5370, E m a i l : a ru s h @c a s c i n c .c om .
M i d C ou n ty P a rk w a y (M C P ), Sa n J a c i n to t o C oron a , R i ve rs i d e C ou n t y , C A, 2004-2011
Client: RCTC. Mr. Duke was the cultural resources task manager for the MCP project. Under Mr.
Duke’s direction the following Caltrans documents were prepared: an ASR, XPI Report, Phase II
report, HRER, ESA Action Plan, HPSR, and FOE. This project involved extensive consultation with
multiple Native American groups, SHPO, and the ACHP. Mr. Duke worked closely with Caltrans
archaeologists, historians, and the Native American Coordinator, as well as RCTC, Caltrans, and
FHWA staff. P roj e c t R e fe re n c e : C a th y B e c h te l , P roj e c t De ve l op m e n t Di re c tor, R i ve rs i d e
C ou n ty T ra n s p orta ti on C om m i s s i on , 4080 L e m on S tre e t, 3rd F l oor, R i ve rs i d e , C A 92502, (951)
787-7141, (951) 787-7920, c b e c h te l @rc tc .org .
E a s t L a k e S p e c i fi c P l a n , L a k e E l s i n ore , 2016-2017
Client: VCS Environmental/City of Lake Elsinore. DUKE CRM conducted a cultural resources
assessment for the 3,000-acre East Lake Specific Plan. The cultural resources assessment included a
record search, archival research, a reconnaissance survey for archaeological resources, and Native
American consultation support for the City’s AB-52 and SB-18 requirements. Twenty-two cultural
resources are known to exist within the Specific Plan area, one of which is a Traditional Cultural
Property (TCP), Lake Elsinore itself (Primary No. 33-11009). Through consultation with the Pechanga
Band of Luiseño Indians it was determined that while this resource is a sacred and significant Tribal
Cultural Resource (TCR). This work was completed in compliance with CEQA. P roj e c t R e fe re n c e :
J u l i e B e e m a n Va n d e rm os t, P re s i d e n t, VC S E n vi ron m e n ta l , I n c ., 30900 R a n c h o Vi e j o R oa d ,
S u i te 100, S a n J u a n C a p i s tra n o, C A 92675, Di re c t Di a l : (949) 234-6070, E m a i l :
J b e e m a n @vc s e n vi ron m e n ta l .c om
HOURLY BILLING RATES
Staff Level Hourly Billing Rate
President/Principal Archaeologist $ 170
Administrator $ 130
Principal Investigator $ 120
Senior Historian/Architectural Historian $ 125
Archaeologist $ 110
Paleontologist $ 110
Field/Laboratory Director $ 110
GIS Specialist $ 95
Field/Laboratory Crew Chief $ 90
Field/Laboratory Crew $ 70
Research Assistant $ 70
Administrative Assistant $ 65
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
B-14
Representative Noise Impact Study Projects for San Jacinto
Project: Baypoint K-12 Preparatory Academy – Noise Impact Study, City of San Jacinto, CA
Client: Steve Nelson
Baypoint Preparatory Academy
Email: stevenjnelson@me.com
p): 760.805.8299
122 ½ South Kalmia Ave
Escondido, CA 92025
Description: The Baypoint Preparatory Academy consists of a K-12 public charter school with the following on-site student
enrollment capacity: 528 Elementary School Students (K – 5), 225 Middle School Students (Grades 6 – 8) and 300
High School Students (Grades 9 – 12) for a total on-site capacity of 1,053 students. The project encompasses
approximately 30-acres within the City of San Jacinto, CA. The noise study evaluated both stationary and traffic
noise impacts to and from the project site, provided noise control measures to lower noise impacts and compared
the findings to City and CEQA noise standards.
Start/End Dates: 3/29/2018 – 6/10/2018
Project: Tentative Parcel Map No. 37231 – Noise Impact Study, City of San Jacinto, CA
Client: Wes Fifield
Panorama Development, LLC
Email: wes@panoramadev.com
p): 909.931.3363
2005 Winston Court
Upland, CA 9178
Description: The Project consists of 3,200 square feet fast food restaurant with drive-thru, 5,100 square feet of fast food
restaurant with drive-thru, a gas station with 12 vehicle fueling positions and a 2,940 square convenience store
and 42,800 square feet of retail uses with approximately 341 parking spaces on approximately 8.84 acres. The
noise study evaluated both stationary and traffic noise impacts to and from the project site, provided noise control
measures to lower noise impacts and compared the findings to City and CEQA noise standards.
Start/End Dates: 2/29/2018 – 5/1/2018
Project: San Jacinto Commonwealth Development – Noise Impact Study, City of San Jacinto, CA
Client: Devon Wesselink
MW Vantage 1, LLC
Email: devon@coast2coastcommercial.com
p): 949.680.4300
26400 La Alameda, Suite 100
Mission Viejo, CA 9261
Description: The project consists of 12,000 square feet of tire store, 24,000 square feet of business park, an automatic car wash with
108-foot tunnel and approximately 24 vacuum bays, 2,720 square feet fast food with drive thru, 16 vehicle fueling
positions convenience store with a car wash facility. The study assesses both the traffic and stationary noise to and
from the project site and compares the results to the applicable City noise limits. The primary source of traffic noise
propagates from San Jacinto Avenue and Commonwealth Avenue
Start/End Dates: 8/29/2017 – 10/30/2017
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
B-15
Client / Reference
City of Mission Viejo
Larry Longnecker
949-470-3024
llongnecker@
cityofmissionviejo.org
Scope of Work
Planning
Urban Design
Public Outreach
Economic Analysis
Mission Viejo’s Core Area contains a mix of civic,
commercial, and recreational uses. SWA was
selected to analyze the area for its revitalization
potential and develop a Vision Plan which
integrates community-based design ideas. The
plan will include a series of flexible development
options that create an exceptional public realm
and will provide options for urban open space
frameworks, market analysis and comparable
studies. The goal is to connect the community
to its civic and commercial core, while also
creatively engaging the project area’s
topography and exposing its hidden gem – the
Oso Creek.
A core area vision for town revitalization —
rooted in community involvement, designed by
character of place, grounded by current market
trends.
MISSION VIEJO CITY HALL
VILLAGE CENTER
LIBRARY
OSO CREEK
LA PAZ WORLD
CUP CENTER
MISSION VIEJO CORE AREA VISION PLAN | City of Mission Viejo
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
B-16
West Hollywood West Overlay Zone and Design Guidelines
Design Solutions for Single-Family Houses
Community Meeting #3 September 6, 2014
Breaking the “Big Box”: Building Size and Shape
HOW IT IS NOW WHAT WE HAVE HEARD OBJECTIVE
Primary concern is buildings
that look too large and
buildings that do not “fit” in
with the neighborhood.
Community support for:
breaking up large, flat walls;
smaller second floors; providing
a choice between approaches;
and addressing roof shape to
help with “fit”.
Make houses appear smaller in order
to fit with the neighborhood, while
allowing flexibility and variety of
house design.
Additional 6’ setback required for
front of second/upper floor
OVERLAY ZONE SOLUTIONS
DESIGN GUIDELINES CONSIDERATIONS
Darker shade indicates a
smaller second floor
Darker shade indicates minimum 3’
variation for at least 25% of the wall
plane
75% of
total side
Flat and continuous roof is not allowed.Stepped roofs are allowed.
Proportions are consistent with the Spanish
Colonial Revival style.
Sloped, gabled roof is a contemporary
response to the existing vernacular.
Modulation of rectilinear volumes.Use of sloped roof forms and lower plate
heights.
2nd Floor is max. 75% of
1st floor, with minimum
variation of 3 feet deep and
wide on each side.
2nd Floor is max. 75% of
1st floor, with minimum
variation of 3 feet deep and
wide on each side.
Single unbroken rooflines across the front of houses will not
be allowed. There must be a vertical or horizontal change of
direction for at least 3 ft of the roofline. Exceptions may be
considered for narrow houses or sloped roofs.
Perceived size of a new building/addition
should be respectful of surrounding
buildings.
The scale and proportion of buildings and
their elements should be consistent with
established residential patterns.
The scale, massing, and proportion of an
addition should be consistent with the
original property.
Client
City of West Hollywood
John Keho, Asst. Dir. Community Development
323.848.6393
jkeho@weho.org
Scope of Work
Community Outreach
Landscape Planning
Urban Design
Design Guidelines
Size
2 square miles
Awards
APA Award of Merit for Planning Best Practices,
West Hollywood West Overlay District and Design
Guidelines, West Hollywood, CA, 2015
The SWA landscape architecture team partnered
with Page & Turnbull, a renowned preservation
architecture firm, to guide the City of West
Hollywood’s efforts to define and preserve its
architectural heritage and neighborhood
character. In an increasingly heated real estate
market, residents and city officials alike struggled
to reign in the influx of ‘Big Box’ single family
homes that broke the continuity of the
neighborhood.
Through extensive community outreach meetings
and a dynamic partnership with city officials, the
updated guideline and zoning code allow for
creativity while protecting the desirable
characteristics of West Hollywood.
Soliciting input on how to preserve the beauty
and integrity of West Hollywood West’s neighbor-
hood character and diverse architectural styles.
CITYWIDE DESIGN GUIDELINES | City of West Hollywood
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
B-17
Whittier’s Uptown is a historic central business
district with a mix of streetscape types. It is a
source of pride for its citizens, has a sense of
identity from its historic roots, and is a place of
great character and attraction due to its unique
building form, diversity of activities, locally
owned storefronts, restaurants and civic
services. SWA worked collaboratively with the
City and it’s citizens to create solutions to
leverage these assets and shape the area into a
destination with a vibrant, urban experience for
all.
Client / Reference
Ben Pongetti
Development Project
Manager
City of Whittier
562.567.9320
bpongetti@
cityofwhittier.org
Size
185 acres
Scope of Work
Public Realm
Programming
Landscape Architecture
UPTOWN STREETSCAPE VISIONING | City of Whittier
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
B-1815
De Novo Planning Group
Santa Ana Comprehensive General Plan Update and Envisioning Sustainability Together Proposal
DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER VIDEOS | City of Corona
http://www.discovercoronadwp.com/about/video.shtml
336 Productions worked closely with Corona's Department of Water
and Power to create entertaining and effective videos. Even though
much of the material was technical and needed to be explained using
industry specific language, 336 wrote scripts that spoke to the public
and explained the process and DWP services clearly and concisely. 336
decided to use a Host to open and close each video, and interviews
with DWP workers to walk viewers through the process or service that
was topic of the video. 336 shot b-roll that not only heightened the ed-
ucational value, but acted as a cinematic element. There are 11 videos
in the series. 336 filmed the videos over the course of 10 days at multi-
ple sites in Corona. The project was completed in 2015.
FFNA PRODUCT VIDEOS | Fujitsu
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGdxi1aPEbru2rFA01k4VUQ
In 2017, 336 Production worked with Fujitsu on 5, 5-10 minute videos,
covering 5 unique product lines. All videos featuring motionraphic ani-
mations over live-action footage. At the start, Fujitsu wanted something
different, something that was entertaining, while informative, and tar-
geting a tech-savvy millennial audience. Aiming to create a series that
incorporates humor, while remaining professional, 336 worked on a
concept that balanced both, and once all parties agreed on the general
concept, we got to work on the scripts. Fujitsu choose us as their video
vendor, not just because of our creative ideas, but because they knew
the quality of our work was of the highest kind.
“INTENSE ABILITY” | Intense Lighting
https://336productions.com/project/intense-lighting-brand-video/
Anaheim based company, Intense Lighting, manufacturer of award
winning, sustainable lighting products reached out to 336 in 2016 with
the need for a branded “About Us” video that highlighted their culture,
facility and products. Together, 336 and Intense collaborated on the sto-
ryboard and script. During pre-production, as is always done, the cine-
matographer and director, came up with creative ways to film the work
spaces, manufacturing area, and warehouse, which included time-lapse
and drone filming. Since there were no interviews or voiceover, they took
a “music video” type approach to the b-roll, knowing that it had to keep
the viewer’s attention throughout the duration on the video.
Contact Jennifer Talley
jennifer.Talley@ci.corona.ca.us
951-736-2321
Contact J. Kent Schrock
kent.schrock@us.fujitsu.com
949-454-7270
Contact Adam Zepeda
AZepeda@IntenseLighting.com
714-422-3960
336 Productions
4.1.b
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: 2. De Novo RFP Response (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
GENERAL PLAN
2040 UPDATE
COST PROPOSAL
Submitted October 9, 2018 by:
In Association With: Economic & Planning Systems, Kittelson, Kearns and West, Duke
Cultural Resource Management, MD Acoustics, SWA Group, and 336 Productions
Prepared for:
The City of San Jacinto
City of San Jacinto
Travis Randel, Community Development Director
595 South San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
De Novo Planning Group
A Land Use Planning, Design, and Environmental Firm
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: 3. De Novo Cost Proposal (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
OVERVIEW
On behalf of the entire De Novo Planning Group proposal team, we are pleased to submit our cost proposal for your
consideration. We are committed to completing all core work tasks (Phases 1 through 8 of our proposed work
plan) for $989,513. All optional tasks can be completed for an additional $210,330. The total cost for all required
and optional tasks, should the City wish to pursue them, is $1,199,843.
TABLE 1: HOURS AND COST SUMMARY
Table 1: Hours and Cost Summary includes the total labor hours, direct costs, and labor costs associated with each
work task, including optional tasks.
TABLE 2: WORK PROGRAM COST DETAILS
Table 2: Work Program Cost Details provides the City additional detail regarding the cost, by team member, asso-
ciated with each individual work task. This table includes a breakdown of hours for De Novo Planning Group by
classification level. Hours for each subconsultant have been included in the Total Labor Hours identified in Table 1.
HOURLY RATE SHEETS
Hourly rate sheets for all team members, except for 336 Productions, have been provided. Please note that as a mul-
timedia production firm (not a professional services firm), 336 Productions does not use hourly rates. Rather, the fee
is product-specific. However, to provide a point of reference, 336 Productions has estimated the total hours involved
in video production, and those hours have been included in Table 1. Should the City wish to review the summary of
hourly totals, by classification, by subconsultant, these background summaries can be provided.
ASSUMPTIONS
De Novo Planning Group prides itself on adhering to our project budgets and schedules. Our assumptions for
preparation of this proposal are included as part of our Response File, as requested in the RFP.
October 9, 2018
Travis Randel, Community Development Director
City of San Jacinto
595 South San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
Subject: Cost Proposal to Prepare the San Jacinto 2040 General Plan Update
De Novo Planning Group
A Land Use Planning, Design, and Environmental Firm
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: 3. De Novo Cost Proposal (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
COST PROPOSAL
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
2
Task 1.1: Kick‐off Meeting and Tour 42 $0 $6,870 $6,870
Task 1.2: Due Diligence and Base Mapping 126 $0 $12,510 $12,510
Task 1.3: Existing Conditions Report 612 $1,500 $76,723 $78,223
Task 1.4: Cultural/Paleontological Assessment Report 280 $0 $35,750 $35,750
Task 1.5: Cultural Landscape Study 340 $0 $56,459 $56,459
Task 1.6: Economic and Market Analysis 186 $0 $31,570 $31,570
PHASE 1 SUBTOTAL 1,586 $1,500 $219,882 $221,382
Task 2.1: Community Engagement Plan 44 $0 $6,190 $6,190
Task 2.2: Project Identity 69 $0 $7,120 $7,120
Task 2.3: Workshops, Pop‐ups, and Open Houses 534 $7,800 $68,110 $75,910
Task 2.4: Online Survey Tool 81 $1,500 $11,753 $13,253
Task 2.5: Focus Group Meetings 131 $2,500 $15,990 $18,490
Task 2.6: Stakeholder Interviews and Other Briefings 69 $1,000 $9,940 $10,940
Task 2.7: Website and Digital Engagement 78 $500 $10,420 $10,920
Task 2.8: Education Materials and Announcements 103 $1,000 $13,515 $14,515
Task 2.9: Vision Plan Document 78 $1,500 $9,850 $11,350
PHASE 2 SUBTOTAL 2,160 $15,800 $152,888 $168,688
Task 3.1: Land Use Alternatives Report 444 $1,500 $61,115 $62,615
Task 3.2: Preferred Land Use Plan Development and Analysis 166 $800 $18,240 $19,040
Task 3.3: Fiscal Analysis 62 $0 $11,770 $11,770
PHASE 3 SUBTOTAL 854 $2,300 $91,125 $93,425
Task 4.1: General Plan Outline and Format 76 $0 $7,940 $7,940
Task 4.2: Administrative Draft General Plan 708 $1,000 $91,310 $92,310
Task 4.3: Public Hearing Draft General Plan 256 $5,500 $28,010 $33,510
Task 4.4: Final General Plan 90 $5,500 $9,940 $15,440
Task 4.5: Implementation Plan 212 $1,000 $23,440 $24,440
PHASE 4 SUBTOTAL 1,342 $13,000 $160,640 $173,640
Task 5.1: Internal Review and Staff Coordination 96 $0 $10,160 $10,160
Task 5.2: Zoning Map Revisions 100 $0 $9,340 $9,340
Task 5.3: Administrative Draft Zoning Ordinance 140 $0 $14,840 $14,840
Task 5.4: Zoning Ordinance Finalization 70 $800 $7,420 $8,220
PHASE 5 SUBTOTAL 406 $800 $41,760 $42,560
Task 6.1: Develop a Baseline GHG Emissions Inventory 124 $100 $13,000 $13,100
Task 6.2 Establish Emissions Reduction Target 160 $100 $16,480 $16,580
Task 6.3: Develop a Climate Action Plan 178 $1,500 $18,280 $19,780
PHASE 6 SUBTOTAL 462 $1,700 $47,760 $49,460
Task 7.1: EIR Kick‐off and Notice of Preparation/Initial Study 80 $600 $8,490 $9,090
Task 7.2: Native American Consultation 74 $0 $8,675 $8,675
Task 7.3: Draft Environmental Impact Report 776 $2,400 $92,493 $94,893
Task 7.4: Final Environmental Impact Report 248 $1,400 $33,005 $34,405
PHASE 7 SUBTOTAL 1,178 $4,400 $142,663 $147,063
Task 8.1: Study Sessions and Public Hearings 238 $4,800 $28,465 $33,265
Task 8.2: Meetings with City Staff 226 $0 $41,770 $41,770
Task 8.3: Project Administration 140 $0 $18,260 $18,260
PHASE 8 SUBTOTAL 604 $4,800 $88,495 $93,295
Subtotals 8,592 44,300$ $945,213 $989,513
TOTAL FEE (NOT TO EXCEED)$989,513
Total FeeDirect CostsTotal Labor
Hours Labor Costs
PHASE 4: GENERAL PLAN
PHASE 5: ZONING UPDATE/GP CONFORMANCE
PHASE 6: CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
PHASE 7: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE
PHASE 8: MEETINGS, HEARINGS, AND MANAGEMENT
PHASE 1: EXISTING CONDITIONS
PHASE 2: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM
PHASE 3: LAND USE ALTERNATIVES
TASK/ACTIVITY
Table 1: Hours and Cost Summary
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: 3. De Novo Cost Proposal (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
COST PROPOSAL
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
3
Task A.1: Administrative Draft Housing Element 156 $500 $17,200 $17,700
Task A.2: Public Review Draft Housing Element 98 $500 $10,580 $11,080
Task A.3: HCD Coordination 40 $100 $4,620 $4,720
OPTION A SUBTOTAL 294 $1,100 $32,400 $33,500
Initial Study Checklist 64 $0 $6,570 $6,570
PHASE B SUBTOTAL 64 $0 $6,570 $6,570
Economic Development Incentives Program 132 $0 $24,880 $24,880
PHASE C SUBTOTAL 132 $0 $24,880 $24,880
Form Based Development Code 650 $0 $100,000 $100,000
PHASE D SUBTOTAL 650 $0 $100,000 $100,000
Community Character Element (all drafts)48 $0 $5,760 $5,760
PHASE E SUBTOTAL 48 $0 $5,760 $5,760
Video Production 336 $0 $39,620 $39,620
PHASE F SUBTOTAL 336 $0 $39,620 $39,620TOTAL OPTIONAL TASKS $210,330
OPTIONAL TASK F: OTHER SUGGESTED/RECOMMENDED TASKS
OPTIONAL TASK B: INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
OPTIONAL TASK C: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES PROGRAM
OPTIONAL TASK D: FORM BASED DEVELOPMENT CODE
OPTIONAL TASK E: COMMUNITY CHARACTER ELEMENT
Total Labor
Hours Direct Costs
OPTIONAL TASK A: HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE
Labor Costs Total Fee
TASK/ACTIVITY
Optional Tasks
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: 3. De Novo Cost Proposal (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Traffic Outreach Econ/Fiscal Noise Cultural Design Video Direct Costs
hours $130 hours $115 hours $100 hours $75 hours Fee
Fee
Task 1.1: Kick‐off Meeting and Tour 12 $1,560 2 $230 8 $800 6 $450 28 $3,040 $2,140 $1,690 $0 $6,870
Task 1.2: Due Diligence and Base Mapping 32 $4,160 20 $2,300 20 $2,000 54 $4,050 126 $12,510 $0 $12,510
Task 1.3: Existing Conditions Report 180 $23,400 40 $4,600 170 $17,000 60 $4,500 450 $49,500 $18,760 $8,463 $1,500 $78,223
Task 1.4: Cultural/Paleontological Assessment Report 4 $520 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 4 $520 $35,230 $35,750
Task 1.5: Cultural Landscape Study 4 $520 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 4 $520 $55,939 $56,459
Task 1.6: Economic and Market Analysis 8 $1,040 0 $0 2 $200 0 $0 10 $1,240 $30,330 $0 $31,570
PHASE 1 SUBTOTAL 240 $31,200 62 $7,130 200 $20,000 120 $9,000 622 $67,330 $20,900 $0 $32,020 $8,463 $91,169 $0 $0 $1,500 $221,382
Task 2.1: Community Engagement Plan 8 $1,040 0 $0 4 $400 0 $0 12 $1,440 $4,750 $6,190
Task 2.2: Project Identity 4 $520 20 $2,300 2 $200 8 $600 34 $3,620 $3,500 $7,120
Task 2.3: Workshops, Pop‐ups, and Open Houses 40 $5,200 24 $2,760 16 $1,600 44 $3,300 124 $12,860 $55,250 $7,800 $75,910
Task 2.4: Online Survey Tool 8 $1,040 0 $0 12 $1,200 4 $300 24 $2,540 $9,213 $1,500 $13,253
Task 2.5: Focus Group Meetings 16 $2,080 4 $460 12 $1,200 12 $900 44 $4,640 $11,350 $2,500 $18,490
Task 2.6: Stakeholder Interviews and Other Briefings 16 $2,080 4 $460 12 $1,200 0 $0 32 $3,740 $6,200 $1,000 $10,940
Task 2.7: Website and Digital Engagement 12 $1,560 4 $460 0 $0 0 $0 16 $2,020 $8,400 $500 $10,920
Task 2.8: Education Materials and Announcements 24 $3,120 0 $0 8 $800 0 $0 32 $3,920 $9,595 $1,000 $14,515
Task 2.9: Vision Plan Document 2 $260 16 $1,840 8 $800 0 $0 26 $2,900 $6,950 $1,500 $11,350
PHASE 2 SUBTOTAL 130 $16,900 72 $8,280 74 $7,400 68 $5,100 344 $37,680 $0 $115,208 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,800 $168,688
Task 3.1: Land Use Alternatives Report 80 $10,400 40 $4,600 50 $5,000 38 $2,850 208 $22,850 $38,265 $1,500 $62,615
Task 3.2: Preferred Land Use Plan Development and Analysis 40 $5,200 20 $2,300 34 $3,400 54 $4,050 148 $14,950 $3,290 $800 $19,040
Task 3.3: Fiscal Analysis 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $11,770 $0 $11,770
PHASE 3 SUBTOTAL 120 $15,600 60 $6,900 84 $8,400 92 $6,900 356 $37,800 $41,555 $0 $11,770 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,300 $93,425
Task 4.1: General Plan Outline and Format 24 $3,120 8 $920 24 $2,400 20 $1,500 76 $7,940 $0 $7,940
Task 4.2: Administrative Draft General Plan 190 $24,700 60 $6,900 220 $22,000 80 $6,000 550 $59,600 $8,040 $23,670 $1,000 $92,310
Task 4.3: Public Hearing Draft General Plan 74 $9,620 30 $3,450 110 $11,000 34 $2,550 248 $26,620 $1,390 $5,500 $33,510
Task 4.4: Final General Plan 20 $2,600 20 $2,300 20 $2,000 22 $1,650 82 $8,550 $1,390 $5,500 $15,440
Task 4.5: Implementation Plan 80 $10,400 16 $1,840 100 $10,000 16 $1,200 212 $23,440 $1,000 $24,440
PHASE 4 SUBTOTAL 388 $50,440 134 $15,410 474 $47,400 172 $12,900 1168 $126,150 $10,820 $0 $23,670 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,000 $173,640
Task 5.1: Internal Review and Staff Coordination 24 $3,120 16 $1,840 40 $4,000 16 $1,200 96 $10,160 $0 $10,160
Task 5.2: Zoning Map Revisions 16 $2,080 24 $2,760 0 $0 60 $4,500 100 $9,340 $0 $9,340
Task 5.3: Administrative Draft Zoning Ordinance 40 $5,200 16 $1,840 60 $6,000 24 $1,800 140 $14,840 $0 $14,840
Task 5.4: Zoning Ordinance Finalization 20 $2,600 8 $920 30 $3,000 12 $900 70 $7,420 $800 $8,220
PHASE 5 SUBTOTAL 100 $13,000 64 $7,360 130 $13,000 112 $8,400 406 $41,760 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800 $42,560
Task 6.1: Develop a Baseline GHG Emissions Inventory 40 $5,200 0 $0 60 $6,000 24 $1,800 124 $13,000 $100 $13,100
Task 6.2 Establish Emissions Reduction Target 36 $4,680 0 $0 100 $10,000 24 $1,800 160 $16,480 $100 $16,580
Task 6.3: Develop a Climate Action Plan 36 $4,680 0 $0 118 $11,800 24 $1,800 178 $18,280 $1,500 $19,780
PHASE 6 SUBTOTAL 112 $14,560 0 $0 278 $27,800 72 $5,400 462 $47,760 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,700 $49,460
Task 7.1: EIR Kick‐off and Notice of Preparation/Initial Study 30 $3,900 6 $690 24 $2,400 20 $1,500 80 $8,490 $600 $9,090
Task 7.2: Native American Consultation 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $8,675 $8,675
Task 7.3: Draft Environmental Impact Report 180 $23,400 24 $2,760 170 $17,000 140 $10,500 514 $53,660 $30,370 $8,463 $2,400 $94,893
Task 7.4: Final Environmental Impact Report 80 $10,400 8 $920 50 $5,000 32 $2,400 170 $18,720 $14,285 $1,400 $34,405
PHASE 7 SUBTOTAL 290 $37,700 38 $4,370 244 $24,400 192 $14,400 764 $80,870 $44,655 $0 $0 $8,463 $8,675 $0 $0 $4,400 $147,063
Task 8.1: Study Sessions and Public Hearings 120 $15,600 8 $920 50 $5,000 44 $3,300 222 $24,820 $3,645 $4,800 $33,265
Task 8.2: Meetings with City Staff 72 $9,360 0 $0 40 $4,000 0 $0 112 $13,360 $4,280 $9,740 $9,140 $5,250 $0 $41,770
Task 8.3: Project Administration 72 $9,360 0 $0 40 $4,000 0 $0 112 $13,360 $4,900 $0 $18,260
PHASE 8 SUBTOTAL 264 $34,320 8 $920 130 $13,000 44 $3,300 446 $51,540 $12,825 $9,740 $9,140 $0 $5,250 $0 $0 $4,800 $93,295
Subtotals 1,644 213,720$ 438 50,370$ 1,614 161,400$ 872 65,400$ 4,568 490,890$ 130,755$ 124,948$ 76,600$ 16,926$ 105,094$ ‐$ ‐$ 44,300$ 989,513$
TOTAL FEE (NOT TO EXCEED)$989,513
Subconsultants and Direct Costs are billed at no markup. De Novo Planning Group reserves the right to reallocate budget between various consulting team members and between tasks, provided the overall project budget does not change.
Spanish translation service is billed as a direct cost and includes in‐person simultaneous Spanish translation, 20 headsets, 2‐way transmitter, and a technician to run the equipment. ASL translation will also be provided. The cost for this service is $1,200 per meeting.
PHASE 7: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE
PHASE 6: CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
Project Manager/
Principal Planner Senior Planner/Designer
SWA GroupMD AcousticsTOTALS 336
Productions
PHASE 2: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM
EPS TOTALS
PHASE 5: ZONING UPDATE/GP CONFORMANCE
PHASE 3: LAND USE ALTERNATIVES
PHASE 8: MEETINGS, HEARINGS, AND MANAGEMENT
PHASE 4: GENERAL PLAN
PHASE 1: EXISTING CONDITIONS
Printing/
Mailing/
TranslationTASK/ACTIVITY
ACTIVITY
Kearns and
West
Duke/
EnviroPro
Associate Planner De Novo SubtotalGIS and Graphics
Kittelson
Table 2: Work Program Cost Details
De Novo Planning Group
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: 3. De Novo Cost Proposal (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Traffic Outreach Econ/Fiscal Noise Cultural Design Video Direct Costs
hours $130 hours $115 hours $100 hours $75 hours Fee
Fee
Task A.1: Administrative Draft Housing Element 80 $10,400 0 $0 44 $4,400 32 $2,400 156 $17,200 $500 $17,700
Task A.2: Public Review Draft Housing Element 46 $5,980 0 $0 28 $2,800 24 $1,800 98 $10,580 $500 $11,080
Task A.3: HCD Coordination 24 $3,120 0 $0 12 $1,200 4 $300 40 $4,620 $100 $4,720
OPTION A SUBTOTAL 150 $19,500 0 $0 84 $8,400 60 $4,500 294 $32,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,100 $33,500
Initial Study Checklist 14 $1,820 0 $0 40 $4,000 10 $750 64 $6,570 $6,570
PHASE B SUBTOTAL 14 $1,820 0 $0 40 $4,000 10 $750 64 $6,570 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,570
Economic Development Incentives Program 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $24,880 $24,880
PHASE C SUBTOTAL 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $24,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,880
Form Based Development Code 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $100,000 $100,000
PHASE D SUBTOTAL 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000
Community Character Element (all drafts)16 $2,080 32 $3,680 0 $0 0 $0 48 $5,760 $5,760
PHASE E SUBTOTAL 16 $2,080 32 $3,680 0 $0 0 $0 48 $5,760 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,760
Video Production 24 $3,120 0 $0 12 $1,200 0 $0 36 $4,320 $35,300 $39,620
PHASE F SUBTOTAL 24 $3,120 0 $0 12 $1,200 0 $0 36 $4,320 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,300 $0 $39,620
TOTAL OPTIONAL TASKS $210,330
OPTIONAL TASK F: OTHER SUGGESTED/RECOMMENDED TASKS
TASK/ACTIVITY
Project Manager/
Principal Planner Senior Planner/Designer Associate Planner
OPTIONAL TASK D: FORM BASED DEVELOPMENT CODE
OPTIONAL TASK E: COMMUNITY CHARACTER ELEMENT
Duke
OPTIONAL TASK A: HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE
SWA Group 336
Productions
Printing/
Mailing/
Translation
TOTALSTOTALSKittelsonKearns and
West EPS
GIS and Graphics De Novo Subtotal
OPTIONAL TASK C: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES PROGRAM
ACTIVITY
MD Acoustics
OPTIONAL TASK B: INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Optional Tasks
De Novo Planning Group
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: 3. De Novo Cost Proposal (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
COST PROPOSAL
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
6
2018 Schedule of Hourly Rates – StandardEffective January 1, 2018 Below are the billing rates for all De Novo staff levels. Direct costs are limited to charges for document printing and shipping, and we do not mark these charges up.
Staff Level Hourly RatePrincipal $130Principal Planner $130Senior Designer/Planner $115Associate Planner $100Biologist$120GIS/Graphics $75
DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP
180 E MAIN STREET SUITE 108, TUSTIN CA, 92780
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: 3. De Novo Cost Proposal (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
COST PROPOSAL
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
7
KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.
BILLING RATE SCHEDULE
Effective January 1, 2018
The current billing rates for Kittelson & Associates, Inc., staff are as follows and are subject to
change:
Staff Billing Rate
$225 - $315
$190 - $220
$160 - $185
$140 - $160
$125 - $135
$150 - $175
$140 - $145
$125 - $135
$105 - $120
$60 - $90
Principal / Senior Principal
Associate Engineer/Planner
Senior Engineer/Planner
Engineer/Planner
Transportation Analyst
Associate Technician
Senior Technician
Technician II
Technician I
Office Support
Other Direct Costs Billing Rate
$.545/mile Mileage
Travel At Cost
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: 3. De Novo Cost Proposal (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
COST PROPOSAL
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
8
201
E
Prod
Billing
1 8 H O U
Executive/Se
Senior T
R
uction and A
rates update
U RLY B
Oaklan
Managing P
Senior P
P
enior Vice Pr
Vice Pr
Technical As
Senior As
As
Research An
Research An
Administrativ
ed annually.
B ILLING
nd and Los A
Principal
Principal
Principal
resident
resident
ssociate
ssociate
ssociate
nalyst II
nalyst I
ve Staff
G R ATE
Angeles Offic
$275–$3
$3
$25
$23
$2
$2
$19
$16
$13
$9
$9
E S
ces
15
15
55
35
15
15
95
60
35
90
90
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: 3. De Novo Cost Proposal (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
COST PROPOSAL
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
9
Duke culturAl resources MAnAgeMent
9/26/2018 (P:\Riverside County\San Jacinto General Plan Update, 2018\Duke CRM SOQ SJGP.docx) 5
of Riverside, and we are preparing to begin an ethnographic cultural landscape study. Due to the
complexity and high sensitivity for archaeological sites within DVE, DUKE CRM has brought in
multiple subconsultants to assist with this project (geoarchaeologist, ethnographer, and
ethnobotanist). Our team recently completed buried sites testing on the TTM project and is preparing
to conduct further buried sites testing in the Specific Plan area. P roj e c t R e fe re n c e : Ad a m R u s h ,
AI C P , Di re c tor of P l a n n i n g , C AS C E n g i n e e ri n g & C on s u l ti n g , I n c ., 1470 C ool e y Dri ve ,
C ol ton , C A 92324, (855) 383-0101 X 5370, E m a i l : a ru s h @c a s c i n c .c om .
M i d C ou n t y P a rk w a y (M CP ), S a n J a c i n t o to C oron a , R i ve rs i d e C ou n ty , C A, 2004-2011
Client: RCTC. Mr. Duke was the cultural resources task manager for the MCP project. Under Mr.
Duke’s direction the following Caltrans documents were prepared: an ASR, XPI Report, Phase II
report, HRER, ESA Action Plan, HPSR, and FOE. This project involved extensive consultation with
multiple Native American groups, SHPO, and the ACHP. Mr. Duke worked closely with Caltrans
archaeologists, historians, and the Native American Coordinator, as well as RCTC, Caltrans, and
FHWA staff. P roj e c t R e fe re n c e : C a th y B e c h te l , P roj e c t De ve l op m e n t Di re c tor, R i ve rs i d e
C ou n ty T ra n s p orta ti on C om m i s s i on , 4080 L e m on S tre e t, 3rd F l oor, R i ve rs i d e , C A 92502, (951)
787-7141, (951) 787-7920, c b e c h te l @rc tc .org .
E a s t L a k e Sp e c i fi c P la n , L a k e E ls i n ore , 2016-2017
Client: VCS Environmental/City of Lake Elsinore. DUKE CRM conducted a cultural resources
assessment for the 3,000-acre East Lake Specific Plan. The cultural resources assessment included a
record search, archival research, a reconnaissance survey for archaeological resources, and Native
American consultation support for the City’s AB-52 and SB-18 requirements. Twenty-two cultural
resources are known to exist within the Specific Plan area, one of which is a Traditional Cultural
Property (TCP), Lake Elsinore itself (Primary No. 33-11009). Through consultation with the Pechanga
Band of Luiseño Indians it was determined that while this resource is a sacred and significant Tribal
Cultural Resource (TCR). This work was completed in compliance with CEQA. P roj e c t R e fe re n c e :
J u l i e B e e m a n Va n d e rm os t, P re s i d e n t, VC S E n vi ron m e n ta l , I n c ., 30900 R a n c h o Vi e j o R oa d ,
S u i te 100, S a n J u a n C a p i s tra n o, C A 92675, Di re c t Di a l : (949) 234-6070, E m a i l :
J b e e m a n @vc s e n vi ron m e n ta l .c om
HOURLY BILLING RATES
Staff Level Hourly Billing Rate
President/Principal Archaeologist $ 170
Administrator $ 130
Principal Investigator $ 120
Senior Historian/Architectural Historian $ 125
Archaeologist $ 110
Paleontologist $ 110
Field/Laboratory Director $ 110
GIS Specialist $ 95
Field/Laboratory Crew Chief $ 90
Field/Laboratory Crew $ 70
Research Assistant $ 70
Administrative Assistant $ 65
Kearns & West
2018 Hourly Rate Sheet
Title Hourly Rate
Vice-President $200
Director $160
Senior Associate $150
Associate $135
Graphic Designer $100
Project Coordinator $95
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: 3. De Novo Cost Proposal (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
COST PROPOSAL
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
10
Exhibit A
Billing Rates for MD Acoustics
Compensation for Services
The Consultants Billing rates for services are as follows:
Position Hourly Rate
Principal Consultant $ 170.00
Sr. Acoustical Consultant $ 135.00
Sr. Vibration Consultant $ 135.00
Consultant $ 115.00
Mechanical Packaging Engineer $ 135.00
COMSOL Expert & Modeling $ 300.00
Engineering Technician I $ 85.00
Engineering Aide $ 55.00
Administrative Assistant $ 55.00
Administrative Aide $ 45.00
Clerical Aide $ 40.00
Principal Controls & Vibration Engineer $ 190.00
Senior Scientist Noise & Vibration $ 175.00
Senior Design Engineer $ 120.00
Expert Witness $ 495.00
Automobile Mileage $ 0.545/mile
General
(1) Per Diem charges are based on current government rates based on area.
(2) Hourly rates apply to work time, travel time and time spent at public hearings and meetings. For overtime work, the
above rates may be increased 50 percent.
(3) Client payment for professional services is not contingent upon the client receiving payment from other parties.
(4) Billing statements for work will be submitted bi-monthly. Statements are payable Net 30 upon receipt by client of
statement. Any statement unpaid after ninety (90) days shall be subject to interest at the maximum permitted by law.
Rev. January 1, 2018
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: 3. De Novo Cost Proposal (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
COST PROPOSAL
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
11
570 Glenneyre Street
Laguna Beach, California
USA 92651-2453
+1.949.497.5471
www.swagroup.com
Hourly Fee Structure
Principals
O’Malley $295.00
Watkins $210.00
Zheng $245.00
Associate Principals
$190.00 - $245.00
Associates
$130.00 - $195.00
Field Specialists
$150.00 - $195.00
Designers
$86.00 - $130.00
Admin & Graphics
$77.00 - $85.00
Other principals, if used on this project, have rates ranging from $210.00 to $325.00
an hour. These rates may be increased subsequently without written notice. Other
employee time shall be charged at a multiple of two and one-half (2.5) times Direct
Personnel Expense.
4.1.c
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: 3. De Novo Cost Proposal (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Section Description
Dudek De Novo
Planning Group
Raimi +
Associates Civic Solutions
GP Update General Plan 2040 $695,116.00 $746,342.50 $727,432.00 $684,283.00
GP Update General Plan 2040 EIR $227,439.00 $243,170.50 $259,918.00 $269,353.00
Subtotal $922,555.00 $989,513.00 $987,350.00 $953,636.00
Optional Tasks Housing Element 6th Cycle $42,220.00 $33,500.00 $54,081.00 $45,680.00
Optional Tasks Initial Study Checklist $6,700.00 $6,570.00 $7,190.00 $23,500.00
Optional Tasks Economic Development Incentives $13,090.00 $24,880.00 $11,320.00 $7,810.00
Optional Tasks Form Based Development Code $94,690.00 $100,000.00 $140,000.00 $250,000.00
Optional Tasks Community Character Element $14,800.00 $5,760.00 $0.00 $26,500.00
Optional Tasks Other Tasks $11,590.00 $39,620.00 $0.00 $7,440.00
$183,090.00 $210,330.00 $212,591.00 $360,930.00
$63,720.00 $45,830.00 $61,271.00 $95,680.00
$1,105,645.00 $1,199,843.00 $1,199,941.00 $1,314,566.00
$986,275.00 $1,035,343.00 $1,048,621.00 $1,049,316.00
Bid Results for Project General Plan 2040 (GP2040)
Issued on 08/28/2018
Bid Due on October 9, 2018 11:00 PM (Pacific)
Exported on 11/13/2018
* Adjusted Total exclused Economic Development Incentives, Form Based Development Code, and Other Suggested/Recommened Tasks
Total
Adjusted Total*
Subtotal
Adjusted Subtotal*
4.1.d
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: 4. Cost Comparison (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Civic SolutionsDe Novo Planning GroupDudek Raimi + Associates65 74 70 69126 138 129 12065 75 64 6563 71 62 64149 204 151 13364 72 71 70138 143 137 11257 53 63 5450 55 55 5362 70 69 69839 955 871 8093124RankingUnderstanding the scope of servicesQuality of proposalApproach to communicatingApproach to performing this type of serviceCreativity in approach and use of technologyDemonstrated professional skill and credentialsFamiliarity with City, County, and State proceduresReasonable costReferences/satisfaction of previous clientsRelated experienceTotalScoring RubericSan Jacinto General Plan 2040 RFP Written Proposal / Initial Screening Totals4.1.ePacket Pg. 281Attachment: 5. Written Proposal Scores (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Civic Solutions De Novo Planning Group Dudek
51 76 49
49 73 53
46 78 52
46 80 55
73 79 69
65 82 67
330 468 345
3 1 2
San Jacinto General Plan 2040 RFP
Interview Totals
Scoring Ruberic
Total
Ranking
Dynamic Presentation
Quality of Examples of Similar Work
Creativity Approach
Demonstrated Use of Technology
Professional Skills and Credentials
Understanding the Scope of Service
4.1.f
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: 6. Interview Scores (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
4.1.g
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: 7. Prospective Bidders List (PlanetBids) (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
4.1.g
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: 7. Prospective Bidders List (PlanetBids) (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
4.1.g
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: 7. Prospective Bidders List (PlanetBids) (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
4.1.g
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: 7. Prospective Bidders List (PlanetBids) (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
4.1.g
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: 7. Prospective Bidders List (PlanetBids) (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
4.1.g
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: 7. Prospective Bidders List (PlanetBids) (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
4.1.g
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: 7. Prospective Bidders List (PlanetBids) (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2 -1-
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
1. PARTIES AND DATE.
This Agreement is made and entered into this _____ day of ________, 20___, by and
between the City of San Jacinto, a municipal corporation, organized under the laws of the State
of California, with its principal place of business at 595 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto,
California 92583 ("City") and De Novo Planning Group a California S-Corp with its principal
place of business at 180 E. Main Street, Suite 108, Tustin, CA 92780 ("Consultant"). City and
Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties."
2. RECITALS.
2.1 Consultant.
Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of certain
professional Planning consulting services required by the City on the terms and conditions set
forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing professional
Planning consulting services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar
with the plans of City.
2.2 Project.
City desires to engage Consultant to render such professional Planning consulting
services for the City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update project ("Project") as set forth in
this Agreement.
3. TERMS.
3.1 Scope of Services and Term.
3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to
the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work
necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional Planning consulting services necessary
for the Project ("Services"). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in
accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference, and all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations.
3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from November 20, 2018 to the
earlier of (1) Project Completion [Certification of PFEIR and Adoption of General Plan 2040; (2)
December 31, 2020, or (3) terminated as provided herein. The City shall have the unilateral
option, at its sole discretion, to renew this Agreement automatically for no more than two additional
one-year terms. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and
shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2 -2-
3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant.
3.2.1 Independent Contractor; Control and Payment of Subordinates. The
Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision. Consultant will determine the
means, methods and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this
Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee.
Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of
this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on
behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under
Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City, nor any of its officials, officers,
directors, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of
Consultant's officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant
shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their
performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be
responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not
limited to: social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability
insurance, and workers' compensation insurance.
3.2.2 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously,
within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in
Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant represents that it
has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance
with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant's conformance with the Schedule, City shall
respond to Consultant's submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Consultant shall
provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services.
3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by
Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.
3.2.4 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to City that
certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should
one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel
of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant
cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this
Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the
Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be
uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a
threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from t he Project by the
Consultant at the request of the City. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are
as follows: Amanda Tropiano, Principal Planner, Project Manager and Benjamin Ritchie, Principal.
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2 -3-
3.2.5 City's Representative. The City hereby designates Travis Randel,
Community Development Director, or his/her designee, to act as its representative in all matters
pertaining to the administration and performance of this Agreement ("City's Representative").
City's Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for review and approval of
all products submitted by Consultant but not the authority to enlarge the Scope of Work or change
the total compensation due to Consultant under this Agreement. The City Manager shall be
authorized to act on City's behalf and to execute all necessary documents which enlarge the
Scope of Work or change the Consultant's total compensation subject to the provisions contained
in Section 3.3 of this Agreement. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person
other than the City Manager, City's Representative or his/her designee.
3.2.6 Consultant's Representative. Consultant hereby designates Amanda
Tropiano, Principal Planner, Project Manager or her designee, to act as its representative for the
performance of this Agreement ("Consultant's Representative"). Consultant's Representative
shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under
this Agreement. The Consultant's Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using
his/her best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques,
sequences, and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services
under this Agreement.
3.2.7 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff
in the performance of Services and shall be available to City's staff, consultants and other staff at
all reasonable times.
3.2.8 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Consultant shall perform all
Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards
generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of
California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling
necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subconsultants
shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally,
Consultant represents that it, its employees and subconsultants have all licenses, permits,
qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services,
and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement.
As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at
its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to
correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant's failure to comply with the
standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Consultant or its sub-consultants who
is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely
completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails
or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed
from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services
or to work on the Project.
3.2.9 Period of Performance. Consultant shall perform and complete all Services
under this Agreement within the term set forth in Section 3.1.2 above (“Performance Time”).
Consultant shall also perform the Services in strict accordance with any completion schedule or
Project milestones described in Exhibits “A” or “B” attached hereto, or which may be separately
agreed upon in writing by the City and Consultant (“Performance Milestones”). Consultant agrees
that if the Services are not completed within the aforementioned Performance Time and/or
pursuant to any such Project Milestones developed pursuant to provisions of this Agreement, it is
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2 -4-
understood, acknowledged and agreed that the City will suffer damage.
3.2.10 Laws and Regulations; Employee/Labor Certification. Consultant shall
keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and
regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all
Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for
all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If Consultant performs
any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations, Consultant shall be solely
responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its
officials, directors, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers free and harmless, pursuant to the
indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure
or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.
3.2.10.1 Employment Eligibility; Consultant. By executing this
Agreement, Consultant verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state
and federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens, including, but not limited to,
the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as may be amended from time to time. Such
requirements and restrictions include, but are not limited to, examination and retention of
documentation confirming the identity and immigration status of each employee of the Consultant.
Consultant also verifies that it has not committed a violation of any such law within the five (5)
years immediately preceding the date of execution of this Agreement, and shall not violate any
such law at any time during the term of the Agreement. Consultant shall avoid any violation of
any such law during the term of this Agreement by participating in an electronic verification of
work authorization program operated by the United States Department of Homeland Security, by
participating in an equivalent federal work authorization program operated by the United States
Department of Homeland Security to verify information of newly hire d employees, or by some
other legally acceptable method. Consultant shall maintain records of each such verification, and
shall make them available to the City or its representatives for inspection and copy at any time
during normal business hours. The City shall not be responsible for any costs or expenses related
to Consultant’s compliance with the requirements provided for in Section 3.2.10 or any of its sub-
sections.
3.2.10.2 Employment Eligibility; Subcontractors, Consultants, Sub-
subcontractors and Subconsultants. To the same extent and under the same conditions as
Consultant, Consultant shall require all of its subcontractors, consultants, sub-subcontractors and
subconsultants performing any work relating to the Project or this Agreement to make the same
verifications and comply with all requirements and restrictions provided for in Section 3.2.10.1.
3.2.10.3 Employment Eligibility; Failure to Comply. Each person
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant verifies that they are a duly authorized officer
of Consultant, and understands that any of the following shall be grounds for the City to terminate
the Agreement for cause: (1) failure of Consultant or its subcontractors, consultants, sub-
subcontractors or subconsultants to meet any of the requirements provided for in Sections
3.2.10.1 or 3.2.10.2; (2) any misrepresentation or material omission concerning compliance with
such requirements (including in those verifications provided to the Consultant under Section
3.2.10.2); or (3) failure to immediately remove from the Project any person found not to be in
compliance with such requirements.
3.2.10.4 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is
an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subconsultant, employee
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2 -5-
or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry,
sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to
initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or
termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City's Minority Business
Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in
effect or hereinafter enacted.
3.2.10.5 Air Quality. To the extent applicable, Consultant must fully
comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations in furnishing or using equipment and/or
providing services, including, but not limited to, emissions limits and permitting requirements
imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and/or California Air
Resources Board (CARB). Although the SCAQMD and CARB limits and requirements are more
broad, Consultant shall specifically be aware of their application to "portable equipment", which
definition is considered by SCAQMD and CARB to include any item of equipment with a fuel -
powered engine. Consultant shall indemnify City against any fines or penalties imposed by
SCAQMD, CARB, or any other governmental or regulatory agency for violations of applicable
laws, rules and/or regulations by Consultant, its sub-consultants, or others for whom Consultant
is responsible under its indemnity obligations provided for in this Agreement.
3.2.10.6 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to
avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant
shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and
regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate
to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety
precautions, where applicable, shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life
protection and lifesaving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all
employees and subconsultants, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges,
gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety
devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent
accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all
safety measures.
3.2.11 Insurance.
3.2.11.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence work
under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all
insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subconsultant
to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that
the subconsultant has secured all insurance required under this section. Failure to provide and
maintain all required insurance shall be grounds for the City to terminate this Agreement for cause.
3.2.11.2 Types of Insurance Required. As a condition precedent to the
effectiveness of this Agreement for work to be performed hereunder, and without limiting the
indemnity provisions of the Agreement, the Consultant, in partial performance of its obligations
under such Agreement, shall procure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of the
Agreement the following policies of insurance. If the existing policies do not meet the insurance
requirements set forth herein, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the policies
to do so.
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2 -6-
(A) Commercial General Liability: Commercial General Liability
Insurance which affords coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office "occurrence"
form CG 00 01, or the exact equivalent, with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence
and no less than $2,000,000 in the general aggregate. Defense costs shall be paid in addition to
the limits. The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions (1) limiting coverage for
contractual liability; (2) excluding coverage for claims or suits by one insured against another
(cross-liability); (3) products/completed operations liability; or (4) containing any other
exclusion(s) contrary to the terms or purposes of this Agreement.
(B) Automobile Liability Insurance: Automobile Liability
Insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CA 00 01 covering
"Any Auto" (Symbol 1), or the exact equivalent, covering bodily injury and property damage for all
activities with limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined limit for each occurrence.
(C) Workers' Compensation: Workers' Compensation
Insurance, as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance with a limit of
not less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease.
(D) Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions): Professional
Liability insurance or Errors & Omissions insurance appropriate to Consultant’s profession with
limits of not less than $1,000,000. Covered professional services shall specifically include all
work to be performed under the Agreement and delete any exclusions that may potentially affect
the work to be performed (for example, any exclusions relating to lead, asbestos, pollution,
testing, underground storage tanks, laboratory analysis, soil work, etc.). If coverage is written on
a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall precede the effective date of the initial Agreement
and continuous coverage will be maintained or an extended reporting period will be exercised for
a period of at least five (5) years from termination or expiration of this Agreement.
Insurance Endorsements. Required insurance policies shall contain the following
provisions, or Consultant shall provide endorsements on forms approved by the City to add the
following provisions to the insurance policies:
(E) Commercial General Liability: (1) Additional Insured: The
City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds with
regard to liability and defense of suits or claims arising out of the performance of the Agreement.
Additional Insured Endorsements shall not (1) be restricted to "ongoing operations"; (2) exclude
"contractual liability"; (3) restrict coverage to "sole" liability of Consultant; or (4) contain any other
exclusions contrary to the terms or purposes of this Agreement. For all policies of Commercial
General Liability insurance, Consultant shall provide endorsements in the form of ISO CG 20 10
10 01 and 20 37 10 01 (or endorsements providing the exact same coverage) to effectuate this
requirement. (2) Cancellation: Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage
reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except
ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.
(F) Automobile Liability. (1) Cancellation: Required insurance
policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written notice of
cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for non-payment
of premium.
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2 -7-
(G) Professional Liability (Errors & Omissions): (1) Cancellation:
Required insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day
written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed
for non-payment of premium. (2) Contractual Liability Exclusion Deleted: This insurance shall
include contractual liability applicable to this Agreement. The policy must “pay on behalf of” the
insured and include a provision establishing the insurer’s duty to defend.
(H) Workers' Compensation: (1) Cancellation: Required
insurance policies shall not be canceled or the coverage reduced until a thirty (30) day written
notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (10) days shall be allowed for
non-payment of premium. (2) Waiver of Subrogation: A waiver of subrogation stating that the
insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents,
and volunteers.
3.2.11.3 Primary and Non-Contributing Insurance. All policies of
Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance shall be primary and any other
insurance, deductible, or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officials, officers, employees,
agents, or volunteers shall not contribute with this primary insurance. Policies shall contain or be
endorsed to contain such provisions.
3.2.11.4 Waiver of Subrogation. All required insurance coverages,
except for the professional liability coverage, shall contain or be endorsed to waiver of subrogation
in favor of the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers or shall specifically
allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications
to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery
against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each
of its subconsultants.
3.2.11.5 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductible or self-
insured retention must be approved in writing by the City and shall protect the City, its officials,
officers, employees, agents, and volunteers in the same manner and to the same extent as they
would have been protected had the policy or policies not contained a deductible or self-insured
retention.
3.2.11.6 Evidence of Insurance. The Consultant, concurrently with the
execution of the Agreement, and as a condition precedent to the effectiveness thereof, shall
deliver either certified copies of the required policies, or original certificates on forms approved by
the City, together with all endorsements affecting each policy. Required insurance policies shall
not be in compliance if they include any limiting provision or endorsement that has not been
submitted to the City for approval. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy
shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. At least
fifteen (15 days) prior to the expiration of any such policy, evidence of insurance showing that
such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended shall be filed with the City. If such
coverage is cancelled or reduced and not replaced immediately so as to avoid a lapse in the
required coverage, Consultant shall, within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such
cancellation or reduction of coverage, file with the City evidence of insurance showing that the
required insurance has been reinstated or has been provided through another insurance company
or companies.
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2 -8-
3.2.11.7 Acceptability of Insurers. Each such policy shall be from a
company or companies with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII and authorized to
transact business of insurance in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance
through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any
federal law.
3.2.11.8 Enforcement of Agreement Provisions (non estoppel).
Consultant acknowledges and agrees that actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform
Consultant of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligation on the City
nor does it waive any rights hereunder.
3.2.11.9 Requirements Not Limiting. Requirement of specific coverage
or minimum limits contained in this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or
other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance.
3.2.11.10 Additional Insurance Provisions
(A) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of
insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant, and any approval of said insurance by the
City, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations
otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to, the
provisions concerning indemnification.
(B) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of
insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled
and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary
and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold
amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel
this Agreement.
(C) The City may require the Consultant to provide complete
copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project.
(D) Neither the City nor any of its officials, officers, employees,
agents or volunteers shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of
this Agreement.
(E) The limits set forth herein shall apply separately to each
insured against whom claims are made or suits are brought, except with respect to the limits of
liability. Further the limits set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from
liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it limit the Consultant’s indemnification obligations
to the City and shall not preclude the City from taking such other actions available to the City
under other provisions of the Agreement or law.
(F) Consultant shall report to the City, in addition to Consultant’s
insurer, any and all insurance claims submitted by Consultant in connection with the Services
under this Agreement.
3.2.11.11 Insurance for Subconsultants. Consultant shall include all
subconsultants engaged in any work for Consultant relating to this Agreement as additional
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2 -9-
insureds under the Consultant's policies, or the Consultant shall be responsible for causing
subconsultants to purchase the appropriate insurance in compliance with the terms of these
Insurance Requirements, including adding the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and
volunteers as additional insureds to the subconsultant's policies. All policies of Commercial
General Liability insurance provided by Consultant’s subconsultants performing work relating to
this Agreement shall be endorsed to name the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and
volunteers as additional insureds using endorsement form ISO CG 20 38 04 13 or an
endorsement providing equivalent coverage. Consultant shall not allow any subconsultant to
commence work on any subcontract relating to this Agreement until it has received satisfactory
evidence of subconsultant’s compliance with all insurance requirements under this Agreement, to
the extent applicable. The Consultant shall provide satisfactory evidence of compliance with this
section upon request of the City.
3.2.12 Water Quality Management and Compliance.
3.2.12.1 Storm Water Management. Storm, surface, nuisance, or other
waters may be encountered at various times during the Services. Consultant hereby
acknowledges that it has investigated the risk arising from such waters, and assumes any and all
risks and liabilities arising therefrom.
3.2.12.2 Compliance with Water Quality Laws, Ordinances and
Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself and all subcontractors, staff, and employees fully
informed of and in compliance with all local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations that may
impact, or be implicated by the performance of the Services including, without limitation, all
applicable provisions of the City’s ordinances regulating water quality and storm water; the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. § 1251, et seq.); the California Porter-Cologne
Water Quality Control Act (Water Code § 13000 et seq.); and any and all regulations, policies, or
permits issued pursuant to any such authority. Consultant must additionally comply with the lawful
requirements of the City, and any other municipalit y, drainage district, or other local agency with
jurisdiction over the location where the Services are to be conducted, regulating water quality and
storm water discharges.
3.2.12.3 Standard of Care. Consultant warrants that all employees and
subcontractors shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the work assigned to them
without impacting water quality in violation of the laws, regulations and policies described in
Section 3.2.12.2 of this Agreement. Consultant further warrants that it, its employees and
subcontractors have or will receive adequate training, as determined by the City, regarding these
requirements as they may relate to the Services.
3.2.12.4 Liability for Non-compliance.
(A) Indemnity: Failure to comply with laws, regulations, and
ordinances listed in Section 3.2.14.2 of this Agreement is a violation of federal and state law.
Notwithstanding any other indemnity contained in this Agreement, Consultant agrees to indemnify
and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, agents, employees and authorized volunteers
from and against any and all claims, demands, losses or liabilities of any kind or nature which the
City, its officials, officers, agents, employees and authorized volunteers may sustain or incur for
noncompliance with the laws, regulations, and ordinances listed above, arising out of or in
connection with the Services, except for liability resulting from the sole established negligence,
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2 -10-
willful misconduct or active negligence of the City, its officials, officers, agents, employees or
authorized volunteers.
(B) Defense: City reserves the right to defend any enforcement
action or civil action brought against the City for Consultant’s failure to comply with any applicable
water quality law, regulation, or policy. Consultant hereby agrees to be bound by, and to
reimburse the City for the costs associated with, any settlement reached between the City and
the relevant enforcement entity.
(C) Damages: City may seek damages from Consultant for
delay in completing the Services caused by Consultant’s f ailure to comply with the laws,
regulations and policies described in Section 3.2.12.2 of this Agreement, or any other relevant
water quality law, regulation, or policy.
3.3 Fees and Payments.
3.3.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including
authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth
in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall
not exceed One Million, One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,100,000) without written approval
of the City Council or City Manager as applicable. Extra Work may be authorized, as described
below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.
3.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly
invoice which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The
invoice shall describe the amount of Services provided since the initial commencement date, or
since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the invoice.
City shall, within 30 days of receiving such invoice, review the invoice and pay all non-disputed
and approved charges thereon. If the City disputes any of Consultant's fees, the City shall give
written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set
forth therein.
3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any
expenses unless authorized in writing by City, or included in Exhibit "C" of this Agreement.
3.3.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may
request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work which
is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the
Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.
Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization
from the City.
3.3.5 Rate Increases. In the event that this Agreement is renewed pursuant to
Section 3.1.2, the rate set forth in Exhibit “C” may be adjusted each year at the time of renewal
as set forth in Exhibit “C.”
3.4 Labor Code Requirements.
3.4.1 Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California
Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations,
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2 -11-
Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing
wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance"
projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or
"maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is
$1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall
provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the
commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing r ates of per
diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services
available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal
place of business and at the project site. It is the intent of the parties to effectuate the
requirements of sections 1771, 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, and 1815 of the Labor Code
within this Agreement, and Consultant shall therefore comply with such Labor Code sections to
the fullest extent required by law. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its
officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers free and harmless from any claim or liability
arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.
3.4.2 Registration/DIR Compliance. If the Services are being performed on a
public works project of over $25,000 when the project is for construction, alteration, demolition,
installation, or repair work, or a public works project of over $15,000 when the project is for
maintenance work, in addition to the foregoing, then pursuant to Labor Code sections 1725.5 and
1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants must be registered with the Department of
Industrial Relations (“DIR”). Consultant shall maintain registration for the duration of the project
and require the same of any subconsultants. This project may also be subject to compliance
monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. It shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility to comply with
all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements, including the submission of payroll
records directly to the DIR. Any stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations
against Consultant or any subconsultant that affect Consultant’s performance of services,
including any delay, shall be Consultant’s sole responsibility. Any delay arising out of or resulting
from such stop orders shall be considered Consultant caused delay and shall not be compensable
by the City. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees
and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of stop orders issued by the
Department of Industrial Relations against Consultant or any subconsultant.
3.4.3 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it
is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every
employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance
in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before
commencing the performance of the Services.
3.5 Accounting Records.
3.5.1 Maintenance and Inspection. Consultant shall maintain complete and
accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such
records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal
business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other
documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data,
documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years
from the date of final payment under this Agreement.
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2 -12-
3.6 General Provisions.
3.6.1 Termination of Agreement.
3.6.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to
Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by
giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof,
at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant
shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and
Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this
Agreement except for cause.
3.6.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as
provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and
Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance
of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and
other information within fifteen (15) days of the request.
3.6.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated
in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as
it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.
3.6.2 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement
shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the
respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:
Consultant: De Novo Planning Group
180 E. Main Street, Suite 108
Tustin, CA 92780
ATTN: Amanda Tropiano, Principal Planner, Project
Manager
City: City of San Jacinto
595 S. San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
ATTN: Travis Randel, Community Development Director
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48)
hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its
applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice
occurred, regardless of the method of service.
3.6.3 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality.
3.6.3.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. This
Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or
sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans,
specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in
any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data
magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2 -13-
prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data"). All Documents & Data shall
be and remain the property of City, and shall not be used in whole or in substantial part by
Consultant on other projects without the City’s express written permission. Within thirty (30) days
following the completion, suspension, abandonment or termination of this Agreement, Consultant
shall provide to City reproducible copies of all Documents & Data, in a form and amount required
by City. City reserves the right to select the method of document reproduction and to establi sh
where the reproduction will be accomplished. The reproduction expense shall be borne by City
at the actual cost of duplication. In the event of a dispute regarding the amount of compensation
to which the Consultant is entitled under the termination provisions of this Agreement, Consultant
shall provide all Documents & Data to City upon payment of the undisputed amount. Consultant
shall have no right to retain or fail to provide to City any such documents pending resolution of
the dispute. In addition, Consultant shall retain copies of all Documents & Data on file for a
minimum of fifteen (15) years following completion of the Project, and shall make copies available
to City upon the payment of actual reasonable duplication costs. Before destroying the
Documents & Data following this retention period, Consultant shall make a reasonable effort to
notify City and provide City with the opportunity to obtain the documents.
3.6.3.2 Subconsultants. Consultant shall require all subconsultants to
agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents &
Data the subconsultant prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that
Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no
such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design
professionals other than Consultant or its subconsultants, or those provided to Consultant by the
City.
3.6.3.3 Right to Use. City shall not be limited in any way in its use or
reuse of the Documents and Data or any part of them at any time for purposes of this Project or
another project, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement
or on a project other than this Project without employing the services of Consultant shall be at
City’s sole risk. If City uses or reuses the Documents & Data on any project other than this Project,
it shall remove the Consultant’s seal from the Documents & Data and indemnify and hold harmless
Consultant and its officers, directors, agents and employees from claims arising out of the
negligent use or re-use of the Documents & Data on such other project. Consultant shall be
responsible and liable for its Documents & Data, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, only
with respect to the condition of the Documents & Data at the time they are provided to the City
upon completion, suspension, abandonment or termination. Consultant shall not be responsible
or liable for any revisions to the Documents & Data made by any party other than Consultant, a
party for whom the Consultant is legally responsible or liable, or anyone approved by the
Consultant.
3.6.3.4 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the
City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless,
pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, for any alleged infringement of any
patent, copyright, trade secret, trade name, trademark, or any other proprietary right of any person
or entity in consequence of the use on the Project by City of the Documents & Data, including any
method, process, product, or concept specified or depicted.
3.6.3.5 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans,
procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written
information, and other Documents & Data either created by or provided to Consultant in
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2 -14-
connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such
materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any
purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to
any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing
furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has
become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use
City's name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or
the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other
similar medium without the prior written consent of City.
3.6.3.6 Confidential Information. The City shall refrain from releasing
Consultant’s proprietary information ("Proprietary Information") unless the City's legal counsel
determines that the release of the Proprietary Information is required by the California Public
Records Act or other applicable state or federal law, or order of a court of competent jurisdiction,
in which case the City shall notify Consultant of its intention to release Proprietary Information.
Consultant shall have five (5) working days after receipt of the Release Notice to give City written
notice of Consultant's objection to the City's release of Proprietary Information. Consultant shall
indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, and its officers, directors, employees, and agents
from and against all liability, loss, cost or expense (including attorney’s fees) arising out of a legal
action brought to compel the release of Proprietary Information. City shall not release the
Proprietary Information after receipt of the Objection Notice unless either: (1) Consultant fails to
fully indemnify, defend (with City's choice of legal counsel), and hold City harmless from any legal
action brought to compel such release; and/or (2) a final and non-appealable order by a court of
competent jurisdiction requires that City release such information.
3.6.4 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one
another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary,
appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.
3.6.5 [Reserved]
3.6.6 Indemnification.
3.6.6.1 To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend
(with counsel of City’s choosing), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees,
volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action,
costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or
persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any
acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees,
subconsultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant’s Services, the
Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness
fees and attorney’s fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant's obligation to
indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Consultant, the City,
its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.
3.6.6.2 If Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold
harmless arises out of Consultant’s performance as a “design professional” (as that term is
defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code
section 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall be
limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2 -15-
misconduct of the Consultant, and, upon Consultant obtaining a final adjudication by a court of
competent jurisdiction, Consultant’s liability for such claim, including the cost to defend, shall not
exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.
3.6.7 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the
parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations,
understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both
parties.
3.6.8 Governing Law; Government Code Claim Compliance. This Agreement
shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County. In
addition to any and all contract requirements pertaining to notices of and requests for
compensation or payment for extra work, disputed work, claims and/or changed conditions,
Consultant must comply with the claim procedures set forth in Government Code sections 900 et
seq. prior to filing any lawsuit against the City. Such Government Code claims and any
subsequent lawsuit based upon the Government Code claims shall be limited to those matters
that remain unresolved after all procedures pertaining to extra work, disputed work, claims, and/or
changed conditions have been followed by Consultant. If no such Government Code claim is
submitted, or if any prerequisite contractual requirements are not otherwise satisfied as specified
herein, Consultant shall be barred from bringing and maintaining a valid lawsuit against the City.
3.6.9 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of
this Agreement.
3.6.10 City's Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves right to employ
other consultants in connection with this Project.
3.6.11 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the
successors and assigns of the parties.
3.6.12 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or
transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the
prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees,
hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted
assignment, hypothecation or transfer.
3.6.13 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have
participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be
construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term
referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work
days. All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subconsultants
of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its
elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this
Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease
of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of
this Agreement.
3.6.14 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of
this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2 -16-
3.6.15 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other
default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or c ondition. No waiver, benefit,
privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any
contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.
3.6.16 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party
beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.
3.6.17 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid,
illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions
shall continue in full force and effect.
3.6.18 Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not
employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely
for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not
paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working
solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration
contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation
of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term
of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her ser vice
with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated
material benefit arising therefrom.
3.6.19 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and
authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party
warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and
authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party.
3.6.20 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of
which shall constitute an original.
3.7 Subcontracting.
3.7.1 Prior Approval Required. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of
the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written
approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all
provisions stipulated in this Agreement.
[SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2 -17-
SIGNATURE PAGE TO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BY AND
BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO AND DE NOVO
PLANNING GROUP
CITY OF SAN JACINTO DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP
By: ____________________________ By: ______________________________
Robert A. Johnson Benjamin Ritchie
City Manager Principal
Attest:
City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
______________________________
Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2
Exhibit “A”-1
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 17
EXHIBIT A – SCOPE OF SERVICES
The City is seeking a Consultant that has extensive experience in preparing General Plans,
a proven ability to assess a City’s current conditions, and knowledge of current State and
Federal regulations as it applies to the completion of General Plan update s and CEQA
compliance. It is anticipated that this update may result in changes to the City’s Land
Use Map, Zoning Map and Municipal Code. In addition, the Consultant must be familiar
with innovative public participation techniques to maximize public input within the
decision-making process. The Consultant should be knowledgeable and competent in
environmental analysis and CEQA compliance documents.
The update of the San Jacinto General Plan should include a separate Existing Conditions
Report, Fiscal Report, Economic Development Report, Administrative Draft General Plan,
Draft General Plan, and Final General Plan. The policy document must be technically
accurate, user-friendly, concise and written in a manner that is easily understood by the
public. There shall be an emphasis on providing information visually through the use of
diagrams, photographs, tables, and maps. Technical appendices containing well -
organized formats for ease in reference must be provided. The document text must
clearly indicate where supporting documentation or evidence for conclusions, policies
or synopsis of data is located. The relationship must be clear, concise and consistent
between the comprehensive General Plan update, technical appendices and the
Program EIR. All State required Elements are to be included, as well as the additional
Elements and components:
Infrastructure
Economic Development
Fiscal
Community Design
Climate Action Plan
Sustainability (throughout)
Cultural Landscape Study
Cannabis Cultivation
Optional Housing Element Update for
the next cycle
Circulation should address model for
LOS and relationship to VMT
Incorporate the Downtown Specific
Plan
Incorporate the Trails Master Plan
Absorb the Gateway Specific Plan into
the General Plan update.
ASSUMPTIONS
Proposals should include a list of the Consultant’s assumptions made in preparation of the
proposal on a separate page entitled, “Assumptions upon Which This Proposal is Based.”
This section should also specifically set forth those documents, maps, and studies which
the Consultant expects to be provided by the City.
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 18
PREPARATION OF GENERAL PLAN
The Consultant shall be responsible for the preparation of Screen Check, Draft and Final
General Plan Update and PEIR. In addition, the consultant shall also be responsible for
the preparation of Administrative Draft(s) and required environmental documentation.
The Consultant shall be prepared to provide the City with all background files and
information used in preparation and completion of the work. All figures, maps, and
exhibits shall be of a size approved by the City and also be clearly legible.
The City wishes for a visioning component within the development of the General Plan
Update. The General Plan is several years old, and it is important that the Consultant
facilitate the development of a Vision for the overall community. Please include the
Visioning process within the Public Participation Program as well as integrating it within
the development of the Economic Development Element, Growth Management
Element, Sustainability Element, and a Fiscal Element. The Consultant is encouraged to
retain an Urban Designer/Graphic Artist who can help visualize development
opportunities throughout the process and document.
The City desires to promote a business-friendly environment, acknowledge its weaknesses
and to realize potential opportunities within the marketplace . Therefore, the City will
adopt an Economic Development Element, which will incorporate multiple features
addressing the City’s competitiveness within the marketplace; identify its challenges and
opportunities, provide strategies to improve economic vital ity of its commercial and
industrial land uses, attract new developments, retain and expand existing businesses
and completion of a market study to understand its current condition of market demand
for retail, hospitality (restaurants and hotels), industrial and housing uses.
The development of the Economic Development Element will rest heavily upon the
completion of an updated Market Study that will describe and analyze existing trade
area demographics, identify retail leakage, absorption rate, void analysis for specific
categories of retail uses, opportunity sites for development, and an inventory and
description of competing retail centers (existing and proposed) within the trade area. The
Market Study will address market demand for i) hotel operation an d ii) different
categories of retail uses that will also include consideration of potential locations for such
uses. List the cost for the market study separately within the budget.
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 19
Additionally, the Fiscal Element will describe the economic foundations, characteristics,
and trends of the City of San Jacinto and to evaluate the City’s position in the regional
economy. The element should explore the relationship between economic policies,
urban development, and land use patterns, and their impact on the financial well-being
of the City. The element should describe the major components that comprise the City's
economic base. Specific components of the economic and fiscal element shall include:
Fiscal issues, the balance between revenues and services that are important to the
City’s ability to maintain and enhance the quality of the physical, social, cultural,
and economic environment enjoyed by San Jacinto residents, businesses, and
visitors.
Past conditions, including land use decisions which have contributed to the City’s
current financial position, which must be continually reevaluated for their
relevance in a growing and changing economy.
Identify future economic development opportunities and constraints, maps future
directions and sets forth goals, policies and programs intended to further expand
and strengthen the City’s growing economy.
The City does not envision full -scale land-use changes, but instead will focus on two key
corridors – the Gateway Area along the Ramona Expressway with special emphasis at
Sanderson Avenue (Hwy 79) and Warren Road; and Ramona Expressway East, extending
from State Street east to Main Street. The City is looking to the Gateway Area to provide
a range of commercial and business park opportunities, taking advantage of the
proposed Mid-County Parkway and Highway 79 Realignment. Ramona Expressway East
serves as the primary entrance to the Soboba Reservation, where their 485,000 square
foot casino expansion and 200 room Hotel is underway. This corridor is envisioned for
commercial retail and recreational opportunities to complement the casino expansion.
The consultant shall prepare Monthly Status Reports to City staff concerning the status of
the work and of completed and pending activities. The consultant shall prepare all public
notices, staff reports, resolutions, ordinances, maps, charts, and other documents
necessary as part of the planning review process.
Following initial research and public outreach efforts, the Consultant shall evaluate the
City’s existing policies and land use patterns, identify amendments to the General Plan
and Zoning Ordinance, and recommend adjustments deemed appropriate, including
new policies and land use alternatives. An Existing Conditions Report shall be prepared
to address recommendations including their feasibility, potential impacts, ramifications,
and outcomes. From this analysis, the Consultant shall develop a series of policy and land
use recommendations to be considered for incorporation into the General Plan.
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 20
Elements shall conform to the most current General Plan Guidelines prepared by the
State Office of Planning and Research. Each draft Element shall contain text, diagrams,
and documentation material sufficient to demonstrate its scope and intent and shall be
internally consistent with the balance of the General Plan. Goals, objectives, and policies
shall be stated clearly and in a manner easily understood by the general public, and a
clear set of policies for each land use designation with viable implementation strategies
should be developed. Goals, objectives and policies shall be cross referenced in various
elements where appropriate. A Table of Contents shall be provided for each element
which includes a comprehensive list of tables, figures, maps, and appendices.
Textual data provided in each element should be supplemented with graphics consisting
of maps, drawings, charts, and tables. All data sources utilized to prepare the Plan text
and graphics shall be documented, referenced, and included in the Plan.
The consultant is to provide a detailed Project Schedule/Work Plan which includes a list
of required key tasks, activities, durations, and milestones to complete the General Plan
Update and CEQA documentation. Time frames should be stated in terms of the number
of calendar days required to complete the specified tasks. The schedule should identify
time periods as the total elapsed time from the start date.
The schedule should track the independent timing for each of the major work
components (e.g., General Plan Elements, Public Participation, CEQA, Technical Studies,
etc.), and the different documents to be developed, reviewed and adopted. The
schedule should include the public participation process, interviews, community
workshops, and public hearings. City staff will discuss the Work Plan with the selected
Consultant prior to execution of a contract for this project. Please note that while the
General Plan Update is a significant priority for the City, staffing resources are limited and
should be taken into account while preparing a schedule.
The Work Plan shall identify the types of data to be prepared, which shall include, but not
be limited to, base maps and an inventory/summarization of the following:
General land use patterns checked against internal records, circulation system,
and public infrastructure conditions.
Open space, recreation, schools, library, cultural, civic, historical, and park
facilities.
Housing, population, demographic and social characteristics. Explore, and
develop if necessary, new land-use designations to serve future growth
characteristics such as, but not limited to, mixed-use projects.
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 21
Evaluate the Land Use Element and establish internal consistency with other
mandated elements in the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Zoning Map.
Economic conditions and factors, base market analysis, economic multiplier
effects on City economy.
Critical analysis of existing economic generators and a forecast of potential
significance in the near future (i.e., 10-20 years).
Local business conditions, including recent commercial and industrial
development trends.
Prevalent community identity, public perception, and image.
Market study community-wide concerning housing, retail, hotel, restaurants, office
parks, research and development, and industrial land uses.
Prevailing physical constraints and opportunities (transportation systems,
infrastructure conditions/capacities, etc.).
Public infrastructure conditions primarily related to additional capacity to
accommodate projected growth.
Assess the need for additional public facilities, based upon projected increases in
land use intensity, population and the correlated need for additional services.
Potential hazards presented along subterranean natural gas, liquid gas
transmission lines.
Demographic patterns and trends.
Crime statistics.
Other data deemed relevant to complete the General Plan Update.
The final work plan shall identify the types of graphics to be provided in the General Plan,
as well as the types of large-scale colored exhibits to be prepared for workshops and
public hearings (e.g., opportunities and constraints map, circulation plan, and summary
map(s) which address vacant and/or underutilized lands, open space, parks, public
facilities and infrastructure, topographic features, noise footprints, seismic, tectonic and
flood hazard areas and other appropriate illustrations of the General Plan).
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 22
DELIVERABLES
Deliverables listed below are intended to establish a baseline. The Consultant is
encouraged to identify creative methods of providing these items utilizing current best
practices and modern approaches. For instance, while the City is expecting 10 copies of
the Finals General Plan in 3-ring binder format; however, the City is also open to
alternative methods, such as book format. Suggested deviations from the deliverables
must be agreed to, in writing, by both the City and Consultant before changes are made.
DELIVERABLES EXPECTE D *
Project Schedule/ Work Plan with major work components and milestones.
Existing Conditions Report containing a summary of findings, data, assumptions,
and a draft outline of the preliminary General Plan. The Report will also contain
preliminary policy and land use recommendations and implementation measures.
Draft General Plan Elements submitted in accordance with the timeframes set forth
in the final work plan.
Large-scale exhibits for workshops and public hearings
Related computer programs/software.
Provide, update, and manage an informative dedicated website for the General
Plan Update that will be linked to the City of San Jacinto’s website.
Final Resolution/Ordinance adoption materials for the General Plan Update and
Zoning Ordinance (if needed for consistency).
Consultant shall prepare all mailings, notices and correspondences for the
distribution and review of all draft and final versions of the General Plan and PEIR.
DELIVERABLES EX PECTED FOR ADOPTED G ENERAL PLAN *
Adopted General Plan in Paper Format (three-hole binders) - 10 copies
Adopted General Plan in PDF and Word Format on CD/DVD - 10 copies
Updated Color Land Use Map (1" = 500') – 5 wall copies (30” x40”)
Updated Color Zoning Map showing areas of inconsistency (1”=500’) – 5 wall
copies
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 23
Updated Color Land Use Map in PDF and GIS format on CD/DVD - 10 copies
Updated GIS Shapefiles including all associated metadata
Ready to Publish ArcGIS Online Maps and documents.
Two (2) color sets of full size, foam-mounted maps and one (1) laminated set at an
appropriate scale per Community Development Director of the following: General
Plan, maps, and tables in format capable of being uploaded onto City website.
Note: Number of required copies is preliminary and may be adjusted as necessary.
However, indicate the cost of each item in the Budget.
Fit in a notebook that is 8 ½ x 11”. The Consultant needs to use programs that City currently
owns.
The format for all textual materials and products shall fit in an 8 ½ x 11” Binder. The format
of graphic elements may vary from said standard but shall be approved by staff prior to
inclusion in any document. Final products shall be formatted for both print and electronic
viewing in a form that is workable, amendable, and easily reproducible. The General Plan
shall be bound in a loose leaf, three-hole binder to easily accommodate amendments.
All studies, charts, graphs, and materials used in preliminary and public review processes
shall become the property of the City of San Jacinto. In addition, the Consultant shall
provide the final textual documents in a format consistent with the word processing
program and GIS program in use by the City at the time of final document delivery. All
map-based exhibits/graphics depicted within General Plan documents and maps shall
include corresponding GIS data used to produce the maps.
All software applications or computer files generated for graphics, texts or pictorials will
be supplied to the City on a disk, flash drive or other mutually agreed upon medium. The
Consultant shall be responsible for ensuring that submitted files and/or programs function
properly on the City’s computer system. For example, posting the new General Plan,
maps, and tables onto the City website.
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 24
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM
The City considers public participation an integral component to the overall success of
the General Plan Update. The Public Participation Program is critical and is paramount in
the collection and understanding of the community and in particular, in the
development of the new elements. The Program should be designed to engage all
segments of the community and to permit individuals to enter and exit the process as
their time and interests allow.
The Consultant will be expected to develop as one of the first work efforts a
comprehensive community outreach and participation program that will include a
strategy to facilitate public participation throughout the entire process, from the initial
review of the existing General Plan and Zoning Code through the public hearing process
for the adoption of the new General Plan. In accordance with the time frame set forth in
the final Work Plan, the Consultant shall prepare a draft Public Participation Program for
City review and approval prior to its implementation. The Consultant will organize and
facilitate all public participation events. The Consultant may be required to provide
Spanish translation services or sufficient number of wireless headsets for translating
purposes, or American Sign Language Interpreter at all community meetings/workshops,
as needed.
The Public Participation Program should include the following elements:
Community public workshops (no less than four evening or weekend workshops).
Focus Group meetings with specific interest groups and segments of the
community (no less than four meetings during the day, night or weekend.
City Council/Planning Commission meetings/workshops (no less than four evening
or weekend meetings).
Involvement of the City's homeowner associations, residential neighborhood
associations and block watch groups in separate stakeholder meetings, as
applicable.
Involvement of business associations, school districts and public utility boards,
agencies, commissions or companies in separate stakeholder meetings.
Solicitation of comments through survey or response forms by mail and on the City’s
website (e.g. SurveyMonkey.com) and/or Consultant website containing
information concerning the General Plan Update.
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 25
Prepare quarterly newsletters to be e-mailed to all registered e-mail addresses in
the City to apprise the community of the status and significant benchmarks and
activities of the work.
Use of the Internet, City website, and publications, such as newsletter articles, to
notify residents of upcoming meeting dates, previous actions and relevant issues,
as approved by the City.
Other innovative public outreach and education process subject to City review
and approval.
Please specify in your Proposal (description and cost).
DELIVERABLES EXPECTED:
Public Participation Program including types and numbers of meetings and work
products that will be generated after each meeting.
Draft abstract of all relevant information received as input from community
participation workshops.
Facilitation of, and participation in, all community meetings and public hearings.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYS IS:
The Consultant shall prepare a comprehensive Program EIR for the work contemplated
in this RFP in accordance with the latest procedural and substantive requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The intent being a Program EIR, which
projects can “tier off,” to facilitate development and promote economic development
in the City. The Program EIR shall encompass the geographic area to include current City
limits and Sphere of Influence. The Program EIR shall also address any zone changes or
development changes required as part of the General Plan.
Optional Task would be to create an Initial Study Checklist Tiering off the Certified
Program EIR. Development of some standard responses to be used for future projects.
The City desires the Program EIR to cover most projects in the City so that Mitigated
Negative Decl aration (MND) are not needed.
The timing for the preparation of the General Plan update and the EIR shall be
overlapping so that the information collection and analysis can be used for both
documents. This will ensure the preparation of both documents will be parallel, iterative,
and consistent.
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 26
The Consultant shall be responsible for any and all procedural steps, including the
preparation of public notices, staff reports, Resolutions, Ordinances, Initial Study, Notice
of Preparation, Notice of Completion, Notice of Determination, Statement of Overriding
Considerations (if necessary), Facts and Findings, and Response to Comments. The
Consultant shall also be responsible for scheduling, noticing and conducting scoping
meetings. The scoping meeting shall include either meeting individually with or soliciting
comments from all responsible, affected and trustee agencies in order to identify and
discuss issues, actions, alternatives, potential and significant environmental effects, and
potential mitigation measures.
The Consultant will prepare technical support reports, appendices, including but not
limited to traffic modeling, geotechnical, biological, air quality, noise, GHG emission
reduction, and archeological reports.
The City shall review and approve all documents prior to distribution by the Consultant.
Policy and implementation programs shall be assessed for their impacts and mitigation
measures shall be identified. The Program EIR shall reference pertinent analysis of the
General Plan sufficient to allow for enactment of future development in the City.
Cumulative and growth-inducing impacts shall also be included in specific sections of
the document (CEQA Guidelines Section 15130); the Program EIR shall consider full “build -
out” of the General Plan. A technical appendix identifying all supporting documents shall
be a part of the Program EIR. The Program EIR shall also be provided in electronic version
with a search feature and GIS maps.
A Mitigation Measures and Monitoring Program shall be prepared pursuant to CEQA. This
document shall be a separately bound document from the Program EIR. The Consultant
shall develop recommended implementation measures appropriate for each element
and also identify the appropriate party responsible for implementa tion, monitoring,
capital costs, and confirmation of implementation. The implementation program should
also include an estimated time frame for completion.
Recommendations shall be developed for a mitigation monitoring system designed to
ensure accomplishment of the General Plan goals. The Mitigation Monitoring Program
(MMP) shall be provided as a portion of the Program EIR.
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 27
DELIVERABLES EXPECTE D
Five hard copies and one PDF copy submitted through electronic mail for each bulleted
item:
Two Screenchecks and one Draft of necessary CEQA Document
One Screencheck and one Draft Response to Comments Document - if applicable
One Screencheck and one Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program - if applicable
One Screencheck and one Draft Statement of Findings and Fac ts - if applicable
One Screencheck and one Draft Statement of Overriding Considerations - if
applicable
Certified Final EIR
Technical Appendices
Ready to Publish ArcGIS Online Maps and documents.
Note: Number of requested copies is preliminary and may be adjusted as necessary.
ZONING CONFORMANCE
The Consultant shall be responsible for the preparation of a Zoning review and update to
the Zoning Map (if required) to ensure compliance with the General Plan Update. In
addition, the consultant shall also be responsible for the preparation of Administrative
Draft(s) and required environmental documentation.
DELIVERABLES EXPECTE D
Draft Zoning Elements submitted in accordance with the timeframes set forth in the
final work plan.
Large-scale exhibits for workshops and Public Hearings.
Provided in an electronic format available and used by the City.
Final Resolution/Ordinance adoption materials for the Zoning Ordinance.
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 28
DELIVERAB LES EXPECTED FOR ADO PTED ZONING
Updated Color Zoning Map (1" = 500') – 5 wall copies (30” x40”).
Updated Color Zoning Map in PDF and GIS format on CD/DVD - 10 copies.
Note: Number of requested copies is preliminary and may be adjusted as necessary.
CITY MEETING SCHEDUL E AND COMMUNICATION
Consultant will keep City staff fully apprised of the status of the project by providing timely
meetings and other forms of communication.
Consultant will designate a Project Manager who will be the point-of-contact for
the City. This individual will attend all meetings and be responsible for th e overall
coordination of activities and completion of the General Plan Update.
Monthly communication with City staff is essential. It is anticipated that these
meetings will be comprised of the Lead Consultant, and team members if
appropriate, as well as City staff. These monthly meetings will be held in City Hall.
It is also anticipated that the use of conference calls will be necessary at various
times throughout the process. The Lead Consultant will coordinate these meetings
for the necessary participants. The number of such meetings is indeterminate and
is not to be in lieu of the monthly on-site meetings at City Hall.
A minimum of two (2) but up to four (4) Planning Commission meetings and two (2)
City Council meetings should be included in the Proposal Budget. Please note that
at the discretion of the City, a joint meeting of the City Council and Planning
Commission may be convened and shall constitute as one (1) meeting. Please list
the cost for each individual Planning Commission and City Council meeting as
separate cost items and include these meetings in the Work Plan and Budget.
Prepare informative PowerPoint presentation for City staff to reference during draft
General Plan Update meetings.
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Exhibit A - Scope of Work San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040 Page 29
COST PROPOSAL
Although an important aspect of consideration, the financial cost estimate will not be the
sole justification for consideration. The City does expect a fair and reasonable project
cost, backed by itemization of how the costs per phase and tasks were developed.
Negotiations may or may not be conducted with the firm; therefore, the proposal
submitted should contain the firm’s most favorable terms and conditions, since selection
and award may be made without discussion with any firm. All prices should reflect “not
to exceed” amounts per item.
Proposals should include, at a minimum, the costs for the completion of each major task
in the work program. Each task should identify the Consultant team member who will be
primarily responsible for completing the task. Costs should be segregated into a time and
materials rate schedule and a not-to-exceed maximum amount for all work. Indicate
hourly rates of individuals involved, a number of hours for each component, task or
product, and the fee structure for additional work outside of the contract and optional
items. Prices shall represent the cost of finished products and cost estimates shall identify
expenditures for graphics, base maps, public meeting and hearing participation, printing,
legal notices, postage, mailing, advertising and other incidental or administrative costs.
A cost analysis for the entire project and separated by major tasks within the General
Plan Update (i.e. fee for each of the elements), Consistency Analysis, and Public
Participation.
Include separate price quotes for:
Housing Element Update for the next cycle
Economic Development Incentives
Form Based Development Code
A Community Character Element
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "A" - SCOPE OF SERVICES 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2
Exhibit “B”-1
EXHIBIT "B"
SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
De Novo Planning Group
44City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
Schedule San Jacinto General Plan Update 2040De Novo Planning GroupTASK DESCRIPTIONPLANSTARTPLANENDDAYSFROM STARTNDJFMAMJ JASONDJFMAMJ JASONDPhase 1 Existing Conditions12/1/2018 3/31/2019120120Contract Award11/20/2018 11/20/201810Task 1.1: Kick-off Meeting and Tour12/1/2018 12/5/201844Task 1.2: Due Diligence and Base Mapping12/1/2018 12/15/20181414Task 1.3: Existing Conditions Report12/1/2018 3/31/2019120120Task 1.4: Cultural/Paleontological Assessment Report12/15/2018 3/1/20197690Task 1.5: Cultural Landscape Study12/15/2018 3/9/20198498Task 1.6: Economic and Market Analysis1/1/2019 2/26/20195687Phase 2 Public Engagement and Visioning12/1/2018 6/1/2020548548Task 2.1: Community Engagement Plan12/1/2018 12/21/20182020Task 2.2: Project Identity12/1/2018 12/31/20183030Task 2.3: Workshops, Pop-ups, and Open House2/1/2019 3/25/2020418480Visioning Workshops2/1/2019 3/15/201942104Pop-up Events2/1/2019 3/15/201942104Open House3/25/2020 3/25/20201480Task 2.4: Online Survey Tool2/1/2019 3/25/2020418480Task 2.5: Focus Group Meetings3/1/2019 3/31/201930120Task 2.6: Stakeholder Interviews and Other Briefings1/1/2019 6/1/2019151182Task 2.7: Website and Digital Engagement12/1/2018 6/1/2020548548Task 2.8: Education Materials and Announcements1/1/2019 6/1/2020517548Task 2.9: Vision Plan Document3/1/2019 3/31/201930120Phase 3 Land Use Alternatives3/31/2019 8/28/2019150270Task 3.1: Land Use Alternatives Report3/31/2019 6/29/201990210Task 3.2: Preferred Land Use Plan Development and Analysis6/29/2019 8/28/201960270Task 3.3: Fiscal Analysis7/29/2019 8/18/201920260Phase 4 General Plan8/28/2019 6/23/2020300570Task 4.1: General Plan Outline and Format8/28/2019 9/27/201930300Task 4.2: Administrative Draft General Plan8/28/2019 12/26/2019 120390Task 4.3: Public Hearing Draft General Plan 12/26/2019 3/25/202090480Task 4.4: Final General Plan 4/24/2020 6/23/202060570Task 4.5: Implementation Plan2/24/2020 3/25/202030480Phase 5 Zoning Update/GP Conformance12/26/2019 5/24/2020150540Task 5.1: Internal Review and Staff Coordination12/26/2019 1/25/202030420Task 5.2: Zoning Map Revisions1/25/2020 2/24/202030450Task 5.3: Administrative Draft Zoning Ordinance2/24/2020 4/24/202060510Task 5.4: Zoning Ordinance Finalization4/24/2020 5/24/202030540Phase 6 Climate Action Plan1/1/2019 7/29/2019209240Task 6.1: Develop a Baseline GHG Emissions Inventory1/1/2019 3/31/201989120Task 6.2 Establish Emissions Reduction Target3/31/2019 4/30/201930150Task 6.3: Develop a Climate Action Plan4/30/2019 7/29/201990240Phase 7 Environmental Clearance8/28/2019 6/23/2020300570Task 7.1: EIR Kick-off and Notice of Preparation/Initial Study8/28/2019 9/27/201930300Task 7.2: Native American Consultation9/27/2019 1/20/2020115415Task 7.3: Draft Environmental Impact Report9/27/2019 4/24/2020210510Task 7.4: Final Environmental Impact Report4/24/2020 6/23/202060570Phase 8 Meetings, Hearings, and Management12/1/2018 6/30/2020577577Task 8.1: Study Sessions and Public Hearings3/31/2019 6/30/2020457577Study Session #13/31/2019 3/31/20191120Study Session #26/29/2019 6/29/20191210Public Hearings5/1/2020 6/30/202060577Task 8.2: Meetings with City Staff12/1/2018 6/23/2020570570Task 8.3: Project Administration12/1/2018 6/23/2020570570Optional TasksA: Housing Element Update8/28/2019 6/23/2020300570B: Initial Study Checklist7/1/2020 7/31/202030608C: Economic Development Incentives Program7/1/2020 8/30/202060638D: Form Based Development Code12/26/2019 5/24/2020150540E: Community Character Element8/28/2019 9/27/201930300F: Other/Video Production12/1/2018 1/31/20196161201820192020Beyond Grant Deliverable DeadlineAdoption of Plan by City Council GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "B" - SCHEDULE OF SERVICES 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
(BB&K 2018)
24438.00000\30452526.2
Exhibit “C”-1
EXHIBIT "C"
COMPENSATION
4.1.h
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
GENERAL PLAN
2040 UPDATE
COST PROPOSAL
Submitted October 9, 2018 by:
In Association With: Economic & Planning Systems, Kittelson, Kearns and West, Duke
Cultural Resource Management, MD Acoustics, SWA Group, and 336 Productions
Prepared for:
The City of San Jacinto
City of San Jacinto
Travis Randel, Community Development Director
595 South San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
De Novo Planning Group
A Land Use Planning, Design, and Environmental Firm
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
OVERVIEW
On behalf of the entire De Novo Planning Group proposal team, we are pleased to submit our cost proposal for your
consideration. We are committed to completing all core work tasks (Phases 1 through 8 of our proposed work
plan) for $989,513. All optional tasks can be completed for an additional $210,330. The total cost for all required
and optional tasks, should the City wish to pursue them, is $1,199,843.
TABLE 1: HOURS AND COST SUMMARY
Table 1: Hours and Cost Summary includes the total labor hours, direct costs, and labor costs associated with each
work task, including optional tasks.
TABLE 2: WORK PROGRAM COST DETAILS
Table 2: Work Program Cost Details provides the City additional detail regarding the cost, by team member, asso-
ciated with each individual work task. This table includes a breakdown of hours for De Novo Planning Group by
classification level. Hours for each subconsultant have been included in the Total Labor Hours identified in Table 1.
HOURLY RATE SHEETS
Hourly rate sheets for all team members, except for 336 Productions, have been provided. Please note that as a mul-
timedia production firm (not a professional services firm), 336 Productions does not use hourly rates. Rather, the fee
is product-specific. However, to provide a point of reference, 336 Productions has estimated the total hours involved
in video production, and those hours have been included in Table 1. Should the City wish to review the summary of
hourly totals, by classification, by subconsultant, these background summaries can be provided.
ASSUMPTIONS
De Novo Planning Group prides itself on adhering to our project budgets and schedules. Our assumptions for
preparation of this proposal are included as part of our Response File, as requested in the RFP.
October 9, 2018
Travis Randel, Community Development Director
City of San Jacinto
595 South San Jacinto Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92583
Subject: Cost Proposal to Prepare the San Jacinto 2040 General Plan Update
De Novo Planning Group
A Land Use Planning, Design, and Environmental Firm
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
COST PROPOSAL
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
2
Task 1.1: Kick‐off Meeting and Tour 42 $0 $6,870 $6,870
Task 1.2: Due Diligence and Base Mapping 126 $0 $12,510 $12,510
Task 1.3: Existing Conditions Report 612 $1,500 $76,723 $78,223
Task 1.4: Cultural/Paleontological Assessment Report 280 $0 $35,750 $35,750
Task 1.5: Cultural Landscape Study 340 $0 $56,459 $56,459
Task 1.6: Economic and Market Analysis 186 $0 $31,570 $31,570
PHASE 1 SUBTOTAL 1,586 $1,500 $219,882 $221,382
Task 2.1: Community Engagement Plan 44 $0 $6,190 $6,190
Task 2.2: Project Identity 69 $0 $7,120 $7,120
Task 2.3: Workshops, Pop‐ups, and Open Houses 534 $7,800 $68,110 $75,910
Task 2.4: Online Survey Tool 81 $1,500 $11,753 $13,253
Task 2.5: Focus Group Meetings 131 $2,500 $15,990 $18,490
Task 2.6: Stakeholder Interviews and Other Briefings 69 $1,000 $9,940 $10,940
Task 2.7: Website and Digital Engagement 78 $500 $10,420 $10,920
Task 2.8: Education Materials and Announcements 103 $1,000 $13,515 $14,515
Task 2.9: Vision Plan Document 78 $1,500 $9,850 $11,350
PHASE 2 SUBTOTAL 2,160 $15,800 $152,888 $168,688
Task 3.1: Land Use Alternatives Report 444 $1,500 $61,115 $62,615
Task 3.2: Preferred Land Use Plan Development and Analysis 166 $800 $18,240 $19,040
Task 3.3: Fiscal Analysis 62 $0 $11,770 $11,770
PHASE 3 SUBTOTAL 854 $2,300 $91,125 $93,425
Task 4.1: General Plan Outline and Format 76 $0 $7,940 $7,940
Task 4.2: Administrative Draft General Plan 708 $1,000 $91,310 $92,310
Task 4.3: Public Hearing Draft General Plan 256 $5,500 $28,010 $33,510
Task 4.4: Final General Plan 90 $5,500 $9,940 $15,440
Task 4.5: Implementation Plan 212 $1,000 $23,440 $24,440
PHASE 4 SUBTOTAL 1,342 $13,000 $160,640 $173,640
Task 5.1: Internal Review and Staff Coordination 96 $0 $10,160 $10,160
Task 5.2: Zoning Map Revisions 100 $0 $9,340 $9,340
Task 5.3: Administrative Draft Zoning Ordinance 140 $0 $14,840 $14,840
Task 5.4: Zoning Ordinance Finalization 70 $800 $7,420 $8,220
PHASE 5 SUBTOTAL 406 $800 $41,760 $42,560
Task 6.1: Develop a Baseline GHG Emissions Inventory 124 $100 $13,000 $13,100
Task 6.2 Establish Emissions Reduction Target 160 $100 $16,480 $16,580
Task 6.3: Develop a Climate Action Plan 178 $1,500 $18,280 $19,780
PHASE 6 SUBTOTAL 462 $1,700 $47,760 $49,460
Task 7.1: EIR Kick‐off and Notice of Preparation/Initial Study 80 $600 $8,490 $9,090
Task 7.2: Native American Consultation 74 $0 $8,675 $8,675
Task 7.3: Draft Environmental Impact Report 776 $2,400 $92,493 $94,893
Task 7.4: Final Environmental Impact Report 248 $1,400 $33,005 $34,405
PHASE 7 SUBTOTAL 1,178 $4,400 $142,663 $147,063
Task 8.1: Study Sessions and Public Hearings 238 $4,800 $28,465 $33,265
Task 8.2: Meetings with City Staff 226 $0 $41,770 $41,770
Task 8.3: Project Administration 140 $0 $18,260 $18,260
PHASE 8 SUBTOTAL 604 $4,800 $88,495 $93,295
Subtotals 8,592 44,300$ $945,213 $989,513
TOTAL FEE (NOT TO EXCEED)$989,513
Total FeeDirect CostsTotal Labor
Hours Labor Costs
PHASE 4: GENERAL PLAN
PHASE 5: ZONING UPDATE/GP CONFORMANCE
PHASE 6: CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
PHASE 7: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE
PHASE 8: MEETINGS, HEARINGS, AND MANAGEMENT
PHASE 1: EXISTING CONDITIONS
PHASE 2: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM
PHASE 3: LAND USE ALTERNATIVES
TASK/ACTIVITY
Table 1: Hours and Cost Summary
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
COST PROPOSAL
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
3
Task A.1: Administrative Draft Housing Element 156 $500 $17,200 $17,700
Task A.2: Public Review Draft Housing Element 98 $500 $10,580 $11,080
Task A.3: HCD Coordination 40 $100 $4,620 $4,720
OPTION A SUBTOTAL 294 $1,100 $32,400 $33,500
Initial Study Checklist 64 $0 $6,570 $6,570
PHASE B SUBTOTAL 64 $0 $6,570 $6,570
Economic Development Incentives Program 132 $0 $24,880 $24,880
PHASE C SUBTOTAL 132 $0 $24,880 $24,880
Form Based Development Code 650 $0 $100,000 $100,000
PHASE D SUBTOTAL 650 $0 $100,000 $100,000
Community Character Element (all drafts)48 $0 $5,760 $5,760
PHASE E SUBTOTAL 48 $0 $5,760 $5,760
Video Production 336 $0 $39,620 $39,620
PHASE F SUBTOTAL 336 $0 $39,620 $39,620TOTAL OPTIONAL TASKS $210,330
OPTIONAL TASK F: OTHER SUGGESTED/RECOMMENDED TASKS
OPTIONAL TASK B: INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
OPTIONAL TASK C: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES PROGRAM
OPTIONAL TASK D: FORM BASED DEVELOPMENT CODE
OPTIONAL TASK E: COMMUNITY CHARACTER ELEMENT
Total Labor
Hours Direct Costs
OPTIONAL TASK A: HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE
Labor Costs Total Fee
TASK/ACTIVITY
Optional Tasks
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Traffic Outreach Econ/Fiscal Noise Cultural Design Video Direct Costs
hours $130 hours $115 hours $100 hours $75 hours Fee
Fee
Task 1.1: Kick‐off Meeting and Tour 12 $1,560 2 $230 8 $800 6 $450 28 $3,040 $2,140 $1,690 $0 $6,870
Task 1.2: Due Diligence and Base Mapping 32 $4,160 20 $2,300 20 $2,000 54 $4,050 126 $12,510 $0 $12,510
Task 1.3: Existing Conditions Report 180 $23,400 40 $4,600 170 $17,000 60 $4,500 450 $49,500 $18,760 $8,463 $1,500 $78,223
Task 1.4: Cultural/Paleontological Assessment Report 4 $520 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 4 $520 $35,230 $35,750
Task 1.5: Cultural Landscape Study 4 $520 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 4 $520 $55,939 $56,459
Task 1.6: Economic and Market Analysis 8 $1,040 0 $0 2 $200 0 $0 10 $1,240 $30,330 $0 $31,570
PHASE 1 SUBTOTAL 240 $31,200 62 $7,130 200 $20,000 120 $9,000 622 $67,330 $20,900 $0 $32,020 $8,463 $91,169 $0 $0 $1,500 $221,382
Task 2.1: Community Engagement Plan 8 $1,040 0 $0 4 $400 0 $0 12 $1,440 $4,750 $6,190
Task 2.2: Project Identity 4 $520 20 $2,300 2 $200 8 $600 34 $3,620 $3,500 $7,120
Task 2.3: Workshops, Pop‐ups, and Open Houses 40 $5,200 24 $2,760 16 $1,600 44 $3,300 124 $12,860 $55,250 $7,800 $75,910
Task 2.4: Online Survey Tool 8 $1,040 0 $0 12 $1,200 4 $300 24 $2,540 $9,213 $1,500 $13,253
Task 2.5: Focus Group Meetings 16 $2,080 4 $460 12 $1,200 12 $900 44 $4,640 $11,350 $2,500 $18,490
Task 2.6: Stakeholder Interviews and Other Briefings 16 $2,080 4 $460 12 $1,200 0 $0 32 $3,740 $6,200 $1,000 $10,940
Task 2.7: Website and Digital Engagement 12 $1,560 4 $460 0 $0 0 $0 16 $2,020 $8,400 $500 $10,920
Task 2.8: Education Materials and Announcements 24 $3,120 0 $0 8 $800 0 $0 32 $3,920 $9,595 $1,000 $14,515
Task 2.9: Vision Plan Document 2 $260 16 $1,840 8 $800 0 $0 26 $2,900 $6,950 $1,500 $11,350
PHASE 2 SUBTOTAL 130 $16,900 72 $8,280 74 $7,400 68 $5,100 344 $37,680 $0 $115,208 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,800 $168,688
Task 3.1: Land Use Alternatives Report 80 $10,400 40 $4,600 50 $5,000 38 $2,850 208 $22,850 $38,265 $1,500 $62,615
Task 3.2: Preferred Land Use Plan Development and Analysis 40 $5,200 20 $2,300 34 $3,400 54 $4,050 148 $14,950 $3,290 $800 $19,040
Task 3.3: Fiscal Analysis 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $11,770 $0 $11,770
PHASE 3 SUBTOTAL 120 $15,600 60 $6,900 84 $8,400 92 $6,900 356 $37,800 $41,555 $0 $11,770 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,300 $93,425
Task 4.1: General Plan Outline and Format 24 $3,120 8 $920 24 $2,400 20 $1,500 76 $7,940 $0 $7,940
Task 4.2: Administrative Draft General Plan 190 $24,700 60 $6,900 220 $22,000 80 $6,000 550 $59,600 $8,040 $23,670 $1,000 $92,310
Task 4.3: Public Hearing Draft General Plan 74 $9,620 30 $3,450 110 $11,000 34 $2,550 248 $26,620 $1,390 $5,500 $33,510
Task 4.4: Final General Plan 20 $2,600 20 $2,300 20 $2,000 22 $1,650 82 $8,550 $1,390 $5,500 $15,440
Task 4.5: Implementation Plan 80 $10,400 16 $1,840 100 $10,000 16 $1,200 212 $23,440 $1,000 $24,440
PHASE 4 SUBTOTAL 388 $50,440 134 $15,410 474 $47,400 172 $12,900 1168 $126,150 $10,820 $0 $23,670 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,000 $173,640
Task 5.1: Internal Review and Staff Coordination 24 $3,120 16 $1,840 40 $4,000 16 $1,200 96 $10,160 $0 $10,160
Task 5.2: Zoning Map Revisions 16 $2,080 24 $2,760 0 $0 60 $4,500 100 $9,340 $0 $9,340
Task 5.3: Administrative Draft Zoning Ordinance 40 $5,200 16 $1,840 60 $6,000 24 $1,800 140 $14,840 $0 $14,840
Task 5.4: Zoning Ordinance Finalization 20 $2,600 8 $920 30 $3,000 12 $900 70 $7,420 $800 $8,220
PHASE 5 SUBTOTAL 100 $13,000 64 $7,360 130 $13,000 112 $8,400 406 $41,760 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800 $42,560
Task 6.1: Develop a Baseline GHG Emissions Inventory 40 $5,200 0 $0 60 $6,000 24 $1,800 124 $13,000 $100 $13,100
Task 6.2 Establish Emissions Reduction Target 36 $4,680 0 $0 100 $10,000 24 $1,800 160 $16,480 $100 $16,580
Task 6.3: Develop a Climate Action Plan 36 $4,680 0 $0 118 $11,800 24 $1,800 178 $18,280 $1,500 $19,780
PHASE 6 SUBTOTAL 112 $14,560 0 $0 278 $27,800 72 $5,400 462 $47,760 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,700 $49,460
Task 7.1: EIR Kick‐off and Notice of Preparation/Initial Study 30 $3,900 6 $690 24 $2,400 20 $1,500 80 $8,490 $600 $9,090
Task 7.2: Native American Consultation 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $8,675 $8,675
Task 7.3: Draft Environmental Impact Report 180 $23,400 24 $2,760 170 $17,000 140 $10,500 514 $53,660 $30,370 $8,463 $2,400 $94,893
Task 7.4: Final Environmental Impact Report 80 $10,400 8 $920 50 $5,000 32 $2,400 170 $18,720 $14,285 $1,400 $34,405
PHASE 7 SUBTOTAL 290 $37,700 38 $4,370 244 $24,400 192 $14,400 764 $80,870 $44,655 $0 $0 $8,463 $8,675 $0 $0 $4,400 $147,063
Task 8.1: Study Sessions and Public Hearings 120 $15,600 8 $920 50 $5,000 44 $3,300 222 $24,820 $3,645 $4,800 $33,265
Task 8.2: Meetings with City Staff 72 $9,360 0 $0 40 $4,000 0 $0 112 $13,360 $4,280 $9,740 $9,140 $5,250 $0 $41,770
Task 8.3: Project Administration 72 $9,360 0 $0 40 $4,000 0 $0 112 $13,360 $4,900 $0 $18,260
PHASE 8 SUBTOTAL 264 $34,320 8 $920 130 $13,000 44 $3,300 446 $51,540 $12,825 $9,740 $9,140 $0 $5,250 $0 $0 $4,800 $93,295
Subtotals 1,644 213,720$ 438 50,370$ 1,614 161,400$ 872 65,400$ 4,568 490,890$ 130,755$ 124,948$ 76,600$ 16,926$ 105,094$ ‐$ ‐$ 44,300$ 989,513$
TOTAL FEE (NOT TO EXCEED)$989,513
Subconsultants and Direct Costs are billed at no markup. De Novo Planning Group reserves the right to reallocate budget between various consulting team members and between tasks, provided the overall project budget does not change.
Spanish translation service is billed as a direct cost and includes in‐person simultaneous Spanish translation, 20 headsets, 2‐way transmitter, and a technician to run the equipment. ASL translation will also be provided. The cost for this service is $1,200 per meeting.
PHASE 7: ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE
PHASE 6: CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
Project Manager/
Principal Planner Senior Planner/Designer
SWA GroupMD AcousticsTOTALS 336
Productions
PHASE 2: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM
EPS TOTALS
PHASE 5: ZONING UPDATE/GP CONFORMANCE
PHASE 3: LAND USE ALTERNATIVES
PHASE 8: MEETINGS, HEARINGS, AND MANAGEMENT
PHASE 4: GENERAL PLAN
PHASE 1: EXISTING CONDITIONS
Printing/
Mailing/
TranslationTASK/ACTIVITY
ACTIVITY
Kearns and
West
Duke/
EnviroPro
Associate Planner De Novo SubtotalGIS and Graphics
Kittelson
Table 2: Work Program Cost Details
De Novo Planning Group
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
Traffic Outreach Econ/Fiscal Noise Cultural Design Video Direct Costs
hours $130 hours $115 hours $100 hours $75 hours Fee
Fee
Task A.1: Administrative Draft Housing Element 80 $10,400 0 $0 44 $4,400 32 $2,400 156 $17,200 $500 $17,700
Task A.2: Public Review Draft Housing Element 46 $5,980 0 $0 28 $2,800 24 $1,800 98 $10,580 $500 $11,080
Task A.3: HCD Coordination 24 $3,120 0 $0 12 $1,200 4 $300 40 $4,620 $100 $4,720
OPTION A SUBTOTAL 150 $19,500 0 $0 84 $8,400 60 $4,500 294 $32,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,100 $33,500
Initial Study Checklist 14 $1,820 0 $0 40 $4,000 10 $750 64 $6,570 $6,570
PHASE B SUBTOTAL 14 $1,820 0 $0 40 $4,000 10 $750 64 $6,570 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,570
Economic Development Incentives Program 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $24,880 $24,880
PHASE C SUBTOTAL 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $24,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,880
Form Based Development Code 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $100,000 $100,000
PHASE D SUBTOTAL 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000
Community Character Element (all drafts)16 $2,080 32 $3,680 0 $0 0 $0 48 $5,760 $5,760
PHASE E SUBTOTAL 16 $2,080 32 $3,680 0 $0 0 $0 48 $5,760 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,760
Video Production 24 $3,120 0 $0 12 $1,200 0 $0 36 $4,320 $35,300 $39,620
PHASE F SUBTOTAL 24 $3,120 0 $0 12 $1,200 0 $0 36 $4,320 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,300 $0 $39,620
TOTAL OPTIONAL TASKS $210,330
OPTIONAL TASK F: OTHER SUGGESTED/RECOMMENDED TASKS
TASK/ACTIVITY
Project Manager/
Principal Planner Senior Planner/Designer Associate Planner
OPTIONAL TASK D: FORM BASED DEVELOPMENT CODE
OPTIONAL TASK E: COMMUNITY CHARACTER ELEMENT
Duke
OPTIONAL TASK A: HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE
SWA Group 336
Productions
Printing/
Mailing/
Translation
TOTALSTOTALSKittelsonKearns and
West EPS
GIS and Graphics De Novo Subtotal
OPTIONAL TASK C: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES PROGRAM
ACTIVITY
MD Acoustics
OPTIONAL TASK B: INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
Optional Tasks
De Novo Planning Group
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
COST PROPOSAL
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
6
2018 Schedule of Hourly Rates – StandardEffective January 1, 2018 Below are the billing rates for all De Novo staff levels. Direct costs are limited to charges for document printing and shipping, and we do not mark these charges up.
Staff Level Hourly RatePrincipal $130Principal Planner $130Senior Designer/Planner $115Associate Planner $100Biologist$120GIS/Graphics $75
DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP
180 E MAIN STREET SUITE 108, TUSTIN CA, 92780
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
COST PROPOSAL
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
7
KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.
BILLING RATE SCHEDULE
Effective January 1, 2018
The current billing rates for Kittelson & Associates, Inc., staff are as follows and are subject to
change:
Staff Billing Rate
$225 - $315
$190 - $220
$160 - $185
$140 - $160
$125 - $135
$150 - $175
$140 - $145
$125 - $135
$105 - $120
$60 - $90
Principal / Senior Principal
Associate Engineer/Planner
Senior Engineer/Planner
Engineer/Planner
Transportation Analyst
Associate Technician
Senior Technician
Technician II
Technician I
Office Support
Other Direct Costs Billing Rate
$.545/mile Mileage
Travel At Cost
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
COST PROPOSAL
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
8
201
E
Prod
Billing
1 8 H O U
Executive/Se
Senior T
R
uction and A
rates update
U RLY B
Oaklan
Managing P
Senior P
P
enior Vice Pr
Vice Pr
Technical As
Senior As
As
Research An
Research An
Administrativ
ed annually.
B ILLING
nd and Los A
Principal
Principal
Principal
resident
resident
ssociate
ssociate
ssociate
nalyst II
nalyst I
ve Staff
G R ATE
Angeles Offic
$275–$3
$3
$25
$23
$2
$2
$19
$16
$13
$9
$9
E S
ces
15
15
55
35
15
15
95
60
35
90
90
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
COST PROPOSAL
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
9
Duke culturAl resources MAnAgeMent
9/26/2018 (P:\Riverside County\San Jacinto General Plan Update, 2018\Duke CRM SOQ SJGP.docx) 5
of Riverside, and we are preparing to begin an ethnographic cultural landscape study. Due to the
complexity and high sensitivity for archaeological sites within DVE, DUKE CRM has brought in
multiple subconsultants to assist with this project (geoarchaeologist, ethnographer, and
ethnobotanist). Our team recently completed buried sites testing on the TTM project and is preparing
to conduct further buried sites testing in the Specific Plan area. P roj e c t R e fe re n c e : Ad a m R u s h ,
AI C P , Di re c tor of P l a n n i n g , C AS C E n g i n e e ri n g & C on s u l ti n g , I n c ., 1470 C ool e y Dri ve ,
C ol ton , C A 92324, (855) 383-0101 X 5370, E m a i l : a ru s h @c a s c i n c .c om .
M i d C ou n t y P a rk w a y (M CP ), S a n J a c i n t o to C oron a , R i ve rs i d e C ou n ty , C A, 2004-2011
Client: RCTC. Mr. Duke was the cultural resources task manager for the MCP project. Under Mr.
Duke’s direction the following Caltrans documents were prepared: an ASR, XPI Report, Phase II
report, HRER, ESA Action Plan, HPSR, and FOE. This project involved extensive consultation with
multiple Native American groups, SHPO, and the ACHP. Mr. Duke worked closely with Caltrans
archaeologists, historians, and the Native American Coordinator, as well as RCTC, Caltrans, and
FHWA staff. P roj e c t R e fe re n c e : C a th y B e c h te l , P roj e c t De ve l op m e n t Di re c tor, R i ve rs i d e
C ou n ty T ra n s p orta ti on C om m i s s i on , 4080 L e m on S tre e t, 3rd F l oor, R i ve rs i d e , C A 92502, (951)
787-7141, (951) 787-7920, c b e c h te l @rc tc .org .
E a s t L a k e Sp e c i fi c P la n , L a k e E ls i n ore , 2016-2017
Client: VCS Environmental/City of Lake Elsinore. DUKE CRM conducted a cultural resources
assessment for the 3,000-acre East Lake Specific Plan. The cultural resources assessment included a
record search, archival research, a reconnaissance survey for archaeological resources, and Native
American consultation support for the City’s AB-52 and SB-18 requirements. Twenty-two cultural
resources are known to exist within the Specific Plan area, one of which is a Traditional Cultural
Property (TCP), Lake Elsinore itself (Primary No. 33-11009). Through consultation with the Pechanga
Band of Luiseño Indians it was determined that while this resource is a sacred and significant Tribal
Cultural Resource (TCR). This work was completed in compliance with CEQA. P roj e c t R e fe re n c e :
J u l i e B e e m a n Va n d e rm os t, P re s i d e n t, VC S E n vi ron m e n ta l , I n c ., 30900 R a n c h o Vi e j o R oa d ,
S u i te 100, S a n J u a n C a p i s tra n o, C A 92675, Di re c t Di a l : (949) 234-6070, E m a i l :
J b e e m a n @vc s e n vi ron m e n ta l .c om
HOURLY BILLING RATES
Staff Level Hourly Billing Rate
President/Principal Archaeologist $ 170
Administrator $ 130
Principal Investigator $ 120
Senior Historian/Architectural Historian $ 125
Archaeologist $ 110
Paleontologist $ 110
Field/Laboratory Director $ 110
GIS Specialist $ 95
Field/Laboratory Crew Chief $ 90
Field/Laboratory Crew $ 70
Research Assistant $ 70
Administrative Assistant $ 65
Kearns & West
2018 Hourly Rate Sheet
Title Hourly Rate
Vice-President $200
Director $160
Senior Associate $150
Associate $135
Graphic Designer $100
Project Coordinator $95
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
COST PROPOSAL
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
10
Exhibit A
Billing Rates for MD Acoustics
Compensation for Services
The Consultants Billing rates for services are as follows:
Position Hourly Rate
Principal Consultant $ 170.00
Sr. Acoustical Consultant $ 135.00
Sr. Vibration Consultant $ 135.00
Consultant $ 115.00
Mechanical Packaging Engineer $ 135.00
COMSOL Expert & Modeling $ 300.00
Engineering Technician I $ 85.00
Engineering Aide $ 55.00
Administrative Assistant $ 55.00
Administrative Aide $ 45.00
Clerical Aide $ 40.00
Principal Controls & Vibration Engineer $ 190.00
Senior Scientist Noise & Vibration $ 175.00
Senior Design Engineer $ 120.00
Expert Witness $ 495.00
Automobile Mileage $ 0.545/mile
General
(1) Per Diem charges are based on current government rates based on area.
(2) Hourly rates apply to work time, travel time and time spent at public hearings and meetings. For overtime work, the
above rates may be increased 50 percent.
(3) Client payment for professional services is not contingent upon the client receiving payment from other parties.
(4) Billing statements for work will be submitted bi-monthly. Statements are payable Net 30 upon receipt by client of
statement. Any statement unpaid after ninety (90) days shall be subject to interest at the maximum permitted by law.
Rev. January 1, 2018
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)
COST PROPOSAL
City of San Jacinto General Plan 2040 Update
De Novo Planning Group
11
570 Glenneyre Street
Laguna Beach, California
USA 92651-2453
+1.949.497.5471
www.swagroup.com
Hourly Fee Structure
Principals
O’Malley $295.00
Watkins $210.00
Zheng $245.00
Associate Principals
$190.00 - $245.00
Associates
$130.00 - $195.00
Field Specialists
$150.00 - $195.00
Designers
$86.00 - $130.00
Admin & Graphics
$77.00 - $85.00
Other principals, if used on this project, have rates ranging from $210.00 to $325.00
an hour. These rates may be increased subsequently without written notice. Other
employee time shall be charged at a multiple of two and one-half (2.5) times Direct
Personnel Expense.
GENERAL PLAN 2040 UPDATE PROGRAM - EXHIBIT "C" - COMPENSATION 4.1.h
Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: 8. Professional Services Agreement (Contract Award - General Plan 2040)