Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 12/6/2011
PLANNING O/ M DATE: ' Lk IN FAVOR: Name: gG fl REQUEST TO SPEAK ISSION AGENDA ITEM#:5 SUBJECT: ❑ ANEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: Representing: Address: LI� n City: Gat l 0-4%1 Telephone No: ) Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Planning Commission Chair and Members of the Planning Commission. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Chairman will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE SECRETARY PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#: DATE: % ‘/ // IN F Name: Repr Address: City: VOR: ❑ NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: ❑ Telephone No: lU /1 Ko Individual sp atcers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#: s ( SUBJECT: DATE: lob -6 IN FAVOR: Name: J NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: ❑ Representing: //evke Address: 44-C 0.4- A U t✓ City: 1-C-M Telephone No: cl S 76 -z3 Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. Address: Li Ci 3 City: T ��--,C� �'(t Telephone No: REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#: a. SUBJECT: _ 07,,-,X3n DATE: 2- L - \ ` 7 Ate 7� IN FAVOR: ❑ NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: ❑ Name: � �� �:- hi t Representing: Sk 1lDL 051 (93Y/1- Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#:c, Q SUBJECT: DATE: IN FAVOR: ❑ NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: ❑ Name:':.. Representing: Address: City: Telephone No: Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPFAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM 0 SUBJECT: DATE: ,1Zf Co I I / IN FAVOR: 0 NEUTRAL: O IN OPPOSITION: CI Name: E.05 U Representing: PC �Uctk— WIL;7_,ZA Address: 0g(9`7 I t/kV704., ,Or City: ,c7q Z Sj Z Telephone No: V/ 9 7 Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNC L AGENDA ITEM#: ' 6 SUBJECT: / I) .4" DATE: /' 7 IN FAVOR: ❑ Name: f / p/9 NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: ❑ Representing: t 'pi if: 777 Address:M g S. 7 ied3y City:S A/W Jr9 C : 1V % & Telephone No: '(0 77a Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#:, ;SUBJECT: DATE:. IN FAVOR: ❑ Name: NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: ❑ Representing: Address: City:,„;')/ , s, q "" ,Telephone No Zi Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#:G.' 0 SUBJECT: k r DATE: <. d IN FAVOR: C] NEUTRAL: O IN OPPOSITION: Name: Representing: Address: City: Telephone No: Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise. Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. Riverside County Probation Department Assembly Bill 109 2011 Inmate Realignment December 6, 2011 mpact on San Jacinto Valley Prison overcrowding and inmate/staff ratios contributed to inadequate services On May 23, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the California Federal Court decision starting the clock on the two year implementation to reduce the prison population by 33,000 inmates, with a goal of 137.5% of design capacity or 110,000 prisoners Chief Probation Officer, Chairman Presiding Superior Court Judge, or designee Sheriff District Attorney Public Defender Police Chief Director, Department of Mental Health Prior to October 1, 2011: • All felony convictions were eligible to be served in State Prison • Misdemeanor and felony custody time up to one year were served in county jail Convictions after October 1, 2011: • Non-violent, non -serious, non -high risk sex offenders go to county jail (60-70% of all felony offenders are N3s) Prior to October 1, 2011: • Supervision of all released prison felons was performed by State Parole Agents (CDCR) • Supervision of felons granted probation by the Court was performed by County Probation Officers After October 1, 2011: ■ Non-violent, non -serious, non -high risk sex (N3s) felony offenders are supervised by probation upon release from prison or county jail ■ Inmates convicted of offenses that are violent, serious, or high risk sex offenses (requiring registration) remain the responsibility of State Parole Probation currently maintains supervision and compliance on 17,000 adult felons/ misdemeanants countywide AB 109 adds N3s who previously would have been supervised by State Parole. The projected average increase will be about 2,500 on or after October 1, 2012 Total supervision responsibility 17,000 + 2,500 = 19,500 Probation has established procedures consistent with evidence -based supervision practices, including: ■ Supervision Intake (file review) ■ Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions (COMPAS) and Risk and Needs Assessment ■ Assignment to appropriate level of supervision • Development of supervision case plan ■ Courage to Change curriculum • Referrals to services according to criminogenic needs (Mental Health, Substance Abuse, Education, Employment Services) • Graduated Sanctions/Incentives as needed to promote rehabilitation (Flash Incarceration, House Arrest, Electronic Monitoring) Offenders are placed in Low, Medium or High level supervision caseloads(riskand needsassessment case management/treatment needs completed) High risk offenders: • caseloads up to 35 • frequent contacts • offenders with high risk of violence will be supervised by armed Probation Officers Medium risk offenders: • caseloads up to 80 • minimum number of monthly contacts with Probation Officers Low risk offenders: • caseloads up to 200 • monthly contact as needed with Probation Officers 10 As of November 23, 2011, we have received 1215 packets with release dates of the next day, the next week, and the next month going out to April 2012 We have completed 735 intakes on the twelve hundred plus. In our first thirty days we assigned 236 releases to supervision, 40% high risk, 38% medium risk, and 22% low risk We have issued 19 warrants for failure to report and 16 failure to appears due to INS holds and outstanding warrants in other jurisdictions 11 As of November 14, 2011, a total of 372 Adult and 88 Juvenile Probationers were being supervised by probation in the city of San Jacinto As of November 21, 2011, a total of 5 PCS clients have been released and reside in the city of San Jacinto As of November 23, 2011, there were 183 active parole cases in the city of San Jacinto supervised by CDCR 12 Current office stats as of November 18, 2011 ■ Located at 1330 S. State Street, Suite A, San Jacinto California 92583 ■ 5,000 square feet ■ Space for 20 staff (Probation/Alternative Sentencing) ■ Current number of probation staff 18, and 2 Alternative Sentencing staff • Areas of coverage include San Jacinto, Hemet, Homeland, Green Acres, Valle Vista, Mountain Center, Idyllwild, Pine Cove, Garnet Valley, and parts of Nuevo and Winchester Proposed Expansion ■ Additional 5, 000 square feet ■ Additional space for 13 staff (Sworn and non - sworn) ■ Two conference rooms • Interview rooms • Drug testing facilities ■ Secure lobby/reception area San Jacinto Enterprise Zone Feasibility Study ■ Comparison of Enterprise Zone studies (Pro/Con ■ Findings of San Jacinto Feasibility Study • Recommendations n Jacinto Enterprise Zone Feasibility Study DGA Consulting 12I61 011; Minn. House of Rep.'s Research Dept. (2005) "Enterprise Zones: A Review of the Economic Theory and Empirical Evidence" "Considering all the studies using [rigorous statistical methods], the economic benefits of enterprise zones are unclear. Most studies find no significant increase in employment, while a few do. Moreover, the prospect for success seems greatest in already economically viable areas, rather than traditional zone locations — areas with stagnant or declining economies." "What causes the difference in results is uncertain. It might be partly related to the statistical method, the data used for analysis, the particular program, or the economy within and surrounding the zone." San Jacinto Enterprise Zone F+e i bility Study DG C onsuitin 12/61201' CA Legislative Analyst's Office (2011) "California's Enterprise Zone Programs" In 2008, 40% of EZ benefits went to businesses >over $1 billion in assets; half of hiring & sales tax credits went to businesses with >$100 million in assets ■ Possible Statewide jobs impacts are limited. Even if an EZ has positive effect on jobs locally, the incentives may just move jobs around the state. ■ "Some EZs better than others"... "applying for EZ can indirectly increase effectiveness of organization of local economic development resources to promote business (e.g., red tape can bereduced)," thereby increasing economic activity. San Jacinto Enterprise Zone Feasibility Study DG4 Consulting12/6/201` Public Policy Research Inst. of CA (2009) "Do CA Enterprise Zones Create Jobs?" ■ Included all EZ's 1992 — 2004 ■ No statistically significant effect found on employment levels or employment growth rates EZ program effectiveness differs across zones: greater marketing & outreach activity, more positive effect on employment Only focused on employment; did not examine unemployment and poverty rates, and the amount of households with wage and salary income San Jacinto Enterprise Zone Feasibility Study DGA Cons 12/6/2011 Report to the CA Dept. of Housing & Community Development (2006) "Enterprise Zones" ■ Included all EZ's, 1980 — 2004 ■ Compared with state overall: - Poverty rates in EZ's declined 7.35% more -Unemployment rates declined 1.2 % more - Household incomes increased 7.1% more - Wage & salary income increased 3.5% more -Vacancy rates decreased 0.85% more -Median rents increased 3.2% more San Jacinto Enterprise Zone FeasibilityStudy DG;A Consulting 12/6/2011 S. O'Keefe, CSU Sacramento (Journal of Urban Economics 2004) "Job Creation in California's Enterprise Zones: A Comparison Using a Propensity Score Matching Model" Matched EZ & non-EZ census tracts, 1992 —1999 data EZ designation appears to raise employment growth 3% annually over non-EZ census tracts for first 6 years of designation; no apparent difference later Number of employees in EZ businesses appears to rise more than non -zone businesses San Jacinto Enterprise Zone Fei ibility Study DGA CConsulting12/6/2011 CA Assoc. of Enterprise Zones (CAEZ) "Cost -Benefit Analysis of California's Enterprise Zone Program" 2003 1992 — 2002 data for all EZ's Employment in EZ's increased more rapidly than in state as a whole: 170% in EZ's versus 117% statewide. 2010 ■ EZs created or retained 118,000+ jobs statewide ■ Saved $32 million in Unemployment Insurance ■ Saved $120 million for the Department of Corrections 18,317 given jobs and taken off of public assistance San Jacinto Enterprise ise Zone Feasibility Stud; 12I612011 • Feasibility Study Key Findings Based on 2010 Application guidelines, San Jacinto, Hemet, & Riverside Co. possess required "Eligible Area" (7 sq. mi.): - 32 Census Tracts meeting 3 of 5 Distress Criteria - 91% commercial and industrial zoning Partner jurisdictions in combination possess basic economic development resources & capabilities needed for successful application al Partner jurisdictions currently lack: - Formal joint -powers management structure needed for multi -jurisdictional zone; - Established partnerships and resource commitments required by state from key local stakeholder organizations (workforce development, business services, finance). Jacinto Enterpri Zone Feasibility Study DGA Consu g Economic development options limited... ■ No Manufacturing Enhancement Zones (MEA's) - special EZ program for Brawley & Calexico lapses Dec. 2012, no renewal ■ No Redevelopment pending State Supreme Court ruling ■ No Federal Empowerment Zones — Clinton administration program of 1990s, last zones expired 2009 ■ Free Trade Zone Extension to include San Jacinto Valley ■ Continue to promote Local/regional economic development leadership & initiative (per Supervisor Stone, Nov. 15 Joint San Jacinto -Hemet City Council meeting) ■ Continue to explore feasibility of Enterprise Zone application ■ Capitalize on whatever economic development opportunity appears San Jacinto Enterprise. Zone Feasibili Study° 12/6/201 Recommendations While awaiting resolution or further development of the following: ■ Governor's January 2012 release of 2012-13 State Budget ■ State Supreme Court January 2012 ruling on continuation or termination of Redevelopment ■ Results of 1st quarter 2012 HCD Stakeholders meetings and EZ reform regulations/rules/criteria development • January 2012 consideration of AB 231, Economic and Community Development Zone act by State Assembly, replacing EZ program, and other similar legislation. ■ Further development of the economic development collaboration efforts with private -sector, partner cities and county. 10 San Jacinto Ent pri e Zone Feasibility Study DGA Consulting 12/6/2011 Recommendations (Cont.) Recommend the following actions: ■ Phase B, Enterprise Zone Application, be suspended until February 2012 ■ Depending on events listed on previous slide, DGA Consulting to develop a revised Phase B Scope of Work and Schedule for Council consideration in February 2012 ■ Continue formal discussions with potential economic development private/public partners that may lead to a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") and/or a Joint Powers Authority ("JPA") to develop & implement multi -jurisdictional economic development strategy for participating communities ■ If no EZ Application is forthcoming, or if Council declines to submit application, JPA would provide means for sharing resources & capabilities to pursue coordinated, collaborative economic developmen strategy for partner communities. San. Ja Ito Enterp se Zone Feasibility Study DGA Consulting n 12/6/2011 Happy Holidays! ! ! ! ! A Consultin 12 San ,Jacinto Enterprise Zone Feasibility Stud DGA Consulting 12/6/2011 San Jacinto Police Department 160 W. Sixth Street San Jacinto, California 92583 Memorandum Officer Jim King began his career with the San Diego Police Department, then hired on with the Riverside County Sheriffs Department in 2005. After being hired, Officer King was assigned to the Courts Division at South West Justice Center. He was transferred to Hemet Sheriffs Station in 2008, where he worked Patrol. Officer King transferred to Patrol at the San Jacinto Police Department in Jan., 2010 and was chosen for the Special Enforcement Team on February 24, 2011. He was chosen for this position due to his leadership abilities, self -motivation and proactive efforts. Officer King leads by example. He is a Field Training Officer and a Range Master. Since joining the Department, Officer King has been the recipient of two stolen vehicle recovery pins awarded by the California Highway Patrol. For the recovery pins, Officer King found 24 stolen vehicles and arrested 12 suspects , 8 abandoned stolen vehicles, and had over $300,000.00 in vehicle recovery. Officer King is the police department's instructor for the Automatic License Plate Readers that are currently installed in several of the police units. He is tasked with updating statistics regarding arrests associated with this system. Officer King set up a "Facebook" account for the San Jacinto Police Department in May 2011 and updates the system daily with important information, such as arrests, upcoming city events, DUI/Safety checkpoints, etc. An example of Officer King's ability to maintain a high standard of performance by maintaining a self-imposed standard of excellence is that he is a 4th degree black belt in Taekwondo. In June 2011, he won a silver medal in the Songham World Championships. Officer King is also a Pressure Points Control Tactics instructor and holds a white belt for Jujitsu. Officer King is a fine example of the positive influence one person can make in the community and the law enforcement profession. 3.08.140 Local preference. A "local vendor" means a firm or individual who for at least twelve consecutive months has regularly maintained a place of business in, or maintained an inventory of merchandise for sale in, and who pays appropriate business permit/license fees to, the city. With respect to those bids relating to the purchase of items subject to state sales, tax, the term "lowest responsible bidder" is deemed to include a one percent discount for local vendors in the computation of bids in order to reflect the financial advantages that accrue to the city by the award of a bid to a local vendor. The city shall also consider the cost to the city to pick up supplies and equipment at some distance from the city, to obtain parts and supplies and to transport such items for repair and maintenance in the computations used to award contracts. (Ord. 1092 § 1 (part), 2001) Notice Requesting Proposals for INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES The City of San Jacinto is requesting proposals for Investment Advisory Services for portfolio management. All proposals must be delivered or received by email by January 12, 2012 at 4:00 p.m., addressed to City of San Jacinto, Attn: Thomas Prill, Acting Finance Director, P.O. Box 488, 595 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92581 or e-mailed to tpriMsanjacintoca.us Proposals received after the date specified above will not be considered. Proposals shall be submitted using the format provided in this package. Parties interested in obtaining a copy of this Request for Proposal (RFP) may do so by calling (951) 537-6352, by faxing their request to (951) 537-6385 or by e-mailing tprill(rsanjacintoca.us . Please include the following information: • name of firm • address • contact person • telephone number, facsimile number and e-mail address • Request For Investment Advisory Services Proposal RFP 595 S. San Jacinto Avenue San Jacinto, CA 92583 (951) 537-6352 — fax (951) 537-6385 tpri11(a)saniacintoca.us Page 1 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page A. Description of Work 3 B. About the City 4 C. General Terms and Conditions Proposal Requirements 5 Contract Award and Execution 6 Criteria for Evaluation and Selection 7 D. Special Terms and Conditions 8 E. Insurance Requirements 11 F. Proposal Submittal Forms Proposer Questionnaire 13 References 16 Statement of Past Contract Disqualifications 17 G. Investment Policy 18 H. Treasurer's Report as of October 31, 2011 24 I. Graph - Cash Balances (not with Fiscal Agent) 29 Page 2 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 Section A - DESCRIPTION OF WORK The City of San Jacinto (the City) is soliciting proposals from one or multiple Investment Advisory firms (Investment Advisors) for full or partial portfolio management services for approximately $50 million in operating and capital funds (non -pension funds). The portfolio is currently primarily managed "in-house", with a majority of funds invested in Money Market Accounts (MMAs), Certificates of Deposit (CDs), and the California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF). The Investment Advisor shall be a registered Investment Advisor as defined and regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and shall be registered in the state of California (State). The Investment Advisor shall be either independent of any financial institution or securities brokerage firm or shall fully disclose any relationships with such financial institution and/or securities brokerage firm describe the length. and :;extent of such rclevent to the firms' relatic nshi The Investment Advisor shall also file a "conflict of interest" statement and disclose any and all relationships with elected City Officials or City staff. Specific services, although not all-inclusive, to be performed are as follows: 1. Manage the City's portfolio with non -discretionary or discretionary* authority. 2. Provide credit analysis of investment instruments in portfolio. 3. Provide monthly/quarterly/annual reporting of City funds under management. 4. Attend quarterly meetings (in person or via teleconference) with the City's Finance Subcommittee; annual meeting in person with the City Council. 5. Evaluate market risk and develop strategies that minimize the impact on the portfolio. 6. Provide assurance of portfolio compliance with applicable policies and laws. 7. Establish an appropriate performance benchmark. 8. Ensure that the portfolio structure matches the City's objectives. 9. Review the City's Investment Policy and make recommendations for change as appropriate. * Discretionary authority will be approved specifically on a case -by -case basis. Investment practices and procedures must comply with State law and the City's Investment Policy. The selected investment visor(s) will be expected to perform to the Prudent Expert Standard. In determining individual investment placements, the following factors shall be considered in priority order: safety (first), liquidity (second) and yield (third). The City's primary investment objective is to achieve a reasonable rate of return on public funds while minimizing the potential for capital losses arising from market changes or issuer default. Although the generation of revenues through interest earnings on investments is an appropriate City goal, the primary consideration in the investment of City funds is capital preservation in the overall portfolio. As such, the City's yield objective is to achieve a reasonable rate of return on City investments rather than the maximum generation of income, which could expose the City to unacceptable levels of risk. Page 3 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 Section B - ABOUT THE CITY The City serves a population of approximately 44,600. The annual budget is around $42 million per year, with $6.9 million coming from User Fees (enterprise funds), $13.7 million in Property Taxes/Assessments/Increment, $2.2 million in Sales Taxes, $2.7 million in Motor Vehicle License Fees, $1.5 million in Franchise Fees, $15 million in Other Revenue/Grants/Reimbursements, and $0.5 million in Investment Interest. The City has an elected City Council of five members, elected to staggered four-year terms. The City also has an elected Treasurer, elected to a four-year term. The City has a Finance Subcommittee comprised of two members of the Council. The Finance Subcommittee is responsible to advise and make recommendations to the Council regarding various financial matters, including audit review and investment policies. The City's Investment Policy, reviewed annually by the Council, is attached to this document as an addendum. Monthly Treasurer's Reports are provided to the Council and the most recent is attached to this document as an addendum. The monthly liquidity of the City has historically been stable and predictable. (A graph of cash balances for the past 5 fiscal years is attached to this document as an addendum.) Property Tax and Motor Vehicle License Fee receipts occur in January and May. Sales Taxes are received monthly, and Franchise Fees are received both quarterly and annually (April). Summer months are usually highest for some User Fees (i.e. Water). The City's current portfolio consists primarily of MMAs, CDs, and LAIF. The City has not purchased Treasuries in recent years, believing that the rates offered by 2-year and 3-year CDs had been better. Recently, the investment in CDs has stopped in anticipation of finding more diverse investments, and the CDs purchased have started maturing. Recently, an investment in the County of Riverside's investment pool similar to LAIF has also been considered. Page 4 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 Section C - GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS Requirement to Meet All Provisions. Each individual or firm submitting a proposal (Proposer) shall meet all of the terms, and conditions of the Request for Proposals (RFP) specifications package. By virtue of its proposal submittal, theProposer acknowledges agreement with and acceptance of all provisions of the RFP specifications. Proposal Submittal. Each proposal must be submitted in the format described in the RFP specifications and accompanied by any other required submittals or supplemental materials. Proposal documents shall be emailed to tprill(csanjacintoca.us as a PDF document, or delivered to City of San Jacinto, Attn: Thomas Prill, Acting Finance Director, P.O. Box 488, 595 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, CA 92581. No FAX submittals will be accepted Each Pr©poseragrees that ali submittals ant supplemental ma'tertal! isclosure.under, the: Public Recor Proposal Format. Please format your response to this request in the order as indicated in the Proposer Questionnaire to facilitate comparisons between respondents. Insurance Certificate. Each proposal must include a certificate of insurance showing: a. The insurance carrier and its A.M. Best rating. b. Scope of coverage and limits. c. Deductibles and self -insured retention. The purpose of this submittal is to generally assess the adequacy of the Proposer's insurance coverage during proposal evaluation; as discussed under Section E Paragraph 'I2 of this document, endorsements are not required until contract award. The City's insurance requirements are detailed in Section E of this document. Proposal Withdrawal and Opening. A Proposer may withdraw its proposal, without prejudice prior to the proposal deadline, by submitting a written request to the Finance Director for its withdrawal. No proposal received after the time specified or at any place or 7 me h other than that stated in the "Notice Requesting Proposals" will be considered. Submittal of One Proposal Only. No Proposer shall be allowed to make or file, or to be interested in more than one proposal, except an alternative proposal when specifically requested; however, an individual or business entity that has submitted a sub -proposal to a Proposer submitting a proposal, is not thereby disqualified from submitting a sub -proposal or from quoting prices to other Proposers Advicors submitting proposals. Communications. All timely requests for information submitted in writing will receive a written response from the City. Telephone or e-mail communications with City staff are not encouraged, but will be permitted. However, any such communication shall not be binding on the City. Page 5 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 CONTRACT AWARD AND EXECUTION Proposal Retention and Award. The City reserves the right to retain all proposals for a period of 60 days for examination and comparison. The City also reserves the right to waive non -substantial irregularities in any proposal, to reject any or all proposals, to reject or delete one part of a proposal and accept the other, except to the extent that proposals are qualified by specific limitations. See the "Special Terms and Conditions" in Section D of this document for proposal evaluation and contract award criteria. Competency and Responsibility of Advisor. The City reserves full discretion to determine the competence and responsibility, professionally and/or financially, of P 'po Ad isor . P ,posers„Advisors will provide, in a timely manner, all information that the City deems necessary to make such a decision. ro ers ro Contract Requirement. The Proposer(s) to whom award is made (Advisor(s)) shall execute a written contract with the City within ten (10) calendar days after notice of the award has been sent by mail to it at the address given in its proposal. The contract to ecu ed k y the Adv�sor(s) and the City:, shall be made the form adopted by the City Business License & Tax. The Advisor(s) must have a valid City business license and tax certificate, if applicable, before execution of the contract. Page 6 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION AND SELECTION Proposals will be evaluated based on the following criteria: • Understanding of the work required by the City and the overall investment program objectives. • Responses to proposer questionnaire. • Proposed approach to managing the portfolio. • Quality, clarity and responsiveness of the proposal. • Demonstrated competence and professional qualifications necessary for successfully performing the work required by the City. • Recent experience in successfully managing similar sized investment portfolios with similar investment objectives. • References. • Background and related experience of the specific individuals to be assigned to this account. • Proposed compensation. Scorecard evaluation will be weighted as follows: 20% Experience of the firm in providing services to public sector entities of similar size and with similar investment objectives; 20% Responses from references; professional experience and qualifications of the individuals assigned to the account; 20% Portfolio advisement and management resources, investment philosophy and recommended approach to management of the investment portfolio; 20% Reporting capabilities; 10% Responsiveness to the RFP, communicating an understanding of the overall program and services required; 10% Fees; As reflected above, contract award will not be based solely on price, but on a combination of factors as determined to be in the best long-term interest of the City. After evaluating the proposals and discussing them further with the finalists or the tentatively selected Advisor(s), the City reserves the right to further negotiate the proposed work and/or method and amount of compensation. The City reserves the right to conduct personal interviews of any Proposer prior to selection. The City will not be liable for any cost incurred by the Proposer in connection with such interview (i.e., travel, accommodations, etc.). Page 7 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 Section D - SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Contract Term. The term of the contract shall be considered "open-ended," subject to agreed -upon termination provisions included in the final contract. 2. Proposal Content. Your proposal must include the following information: a. Submittal Forms i. Proposal submittal ii. Responses to proposer questionnaire iii. Certificate of insurance iv. References from at least five similar entities for whom you have provided similar services v. Statement of any past contract disqualifications vi. Conflict of Interest statement disclosing any and all relationships with elected City Officials or City staff vii. Any additional information about your firm that will assist us in the selection process Note: For ease of electronic preparation, Proposer may prepare their own proposal submittal forms as long as they contain the same information in a similar format. b. Proposal Length and Format i. Proposals should not exceed 30 pages, including supplemental materials. 3. Proposal Review and Award Schedule. The following is an outline of the anticipated schedule for proposal review and contract award: Issue RFP 12/07/2011 Receive proposals 01/12/2012 Complete proposal evaluation 01/26/2012 Conduct finalist interviews 02/02/2012 Finalize staff recommendation 02/09/2012 Award contract 02/21/2012 Execute contract 02/29/2012 Start work 03/01/2012 4. Ownership of Materials. All original documents and other materials prepared by or in possession of the Advisor(s) as part of the work or services under these specifications shall become the permanent property of the City, and shall be delivered to the City upon demand. 5. Release of Reports and Information. Any reports, information, data, or other material given to, prepared by or assembled by the Advisor(s) as part of the work or services under these specifications shall be the property of City and shall not be made available to any individual or organization by the Advisor(s) without the prior written approval of the City. 6. Copies of Reports and Information. If the City requests additional copies of reports, drawings, specifications, or any other material in addition to what the Page 8 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 Advisor(s) is required to furnish in limited quantities as part of the work or services under these specifications, the Advisor(s) shall provide such additional copies as are requested, and the City shall compensate the Advisor(s) for the costs of duplicating of such copies at the Advisor's direct expense. 7. Required Deliverable Products. The selected Advisor(s) will be required to provide: a. Monthly reports that include the following: i. Summary of Portfolio Holdings. A listing of all securities held at the end of the month categorized by type of security, maturity, institution and rating, as well as a report on any investment's change in rating from the previous month. ii. Investment Performance Report. At a minimum the performance report should show total returns for the period compared to the established benchmark. iii. Maturity/Duration Indicators. The monthly report should include portfolio duration and average maturity statistics to help monitor interest -rate risk. iv. Transaction Summary. A summary of completed transactions for the month. v. Mark -to -Market Report. The monthly report should show the cost and market value for each security in the portfolio. vi. Any other information required by the City's Investment Policy. b. When computers have been used to produce materials submitted to the City as a part of the work scope, the Advisor(s) must provide the corresponding computer files to the City, compatible with the following programs whenever possible unless otherwise directed by the project manager: i. Word Processing Microsoft Word ii. Spreadsheets Microsoft Excel 8. Attendance at Meetings and Hearings. As part of the work scope and included in the contract price is attendance by the Advisor(s) to as many "working" meetings with staff as determined by the City as necessary in performing work scope tasks. 9. Alternative Proposals. The Proposer may submit an alternative proposal (or proposals) that it believes will also meet the City's project objectives but in a different way. In this case, the Proposer must provide an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each of the alternatives, and discuss under what circumstances the City would prefer one alternative to the other(s). If an alternative proposal is submitted, the maximum length of the proposal may be expanded proportionately by the number of alternatives submitted. 10. Services to Other Clients. It is understood that the Advisor(s) performs investment management services for other clients. It is understood that the Advisor(s) shall not have any obligations to purchase or sell for the City account any security which the Advisor(s), its principals, affiliates or employees may purchase or sell for its or their own account or for the account of any other client, if in the Advisor's good faith opinion such transaction or investment appears unsuitable, impractical or undesirable for the City account. Page 9 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 11.Allocation of Brokerage. Where the Advisor(s) places orders for the execution of portfolio transactions for the City account, the Advisor(s) may allocate such transactions to such brokers and dealers for execution on such markets, at such prices and at such commission rates as in the good faith judgment of the Advisor(s) will be in the best interest of the City. The Advisor(s) shall not receive any soft dollar benefit for any transaction placed on behalf of the City. 12.Safekeeping. All securities owned by the City shall be held in safekeeping by a third party bank trust department acting as agent for the City under the terms of a custody agreement executed by the bank and the City. All securities will be received and delivered using standard delivery versus payment (DVP) procedures. Page 10 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 Section E - INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS The Advisor(s) shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Advisor(s), its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). 2. Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). 3. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. 4. Errors and Omissions Liability insurance as appropriate to the consultant's profession. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Advisor shall maintain limits no less than: 1. General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4. Errors and Omissions Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Advisor(s) shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1. The City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Advisor(s); products and completed operations of the Advisor(s); premises owned, occupied or used by the Advisor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Advisor(s). The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, official, employees, agents or volunteers. 2. For any claims related to this project, the Advisor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and Page 11 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers shall be excess of the Advisor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3. The Advisor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 4. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII. Verification of Coverage. Advisor(s) shall furnish the City with a certificate of insurance showing maintenance of the required insurance coverage. Original endorsements effecting general liability and automobile liability coverage required by this clause must also be provided. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City apart or'after the contract is awarded, but before work commences. Page 12 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 Section F - PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL FORMS PROPOSER QUESTIONNAIRE FIRM BACKGROUND AND ORGANIZATION 1. Describe the organization, date founded, and ownership of your firm. If your firm experienced a material change in organizational structure, ownership or management during the past three years, describe the change. 2. Describe any other business affiliations (subsidiaries, joint ventures, "soft dollar" arrangements with brokers). Describe your firm's policy on soft dollars. 3. Is your firm a registered investment Advisor under the Investment Advisor's Act of 1940, as amended? 4. Explain any SEC, National Association ofSecuritiesDealers (NASD), or regulatory censure or litigation listed on your Form ADV involving your firm or the proposing Advisors. 5. Did you, or will you, pay a finder's fee to any third party for business related to this account? Specify the recipients of any fee. EXPERIENCE 6. Describe your firm's experience in managing fixed income portfolios. 7. What is your firm's experience in investment policies and portfolio management guidelines? 8. Does your firm act as a broker or as a primary dealer in securities or receive any other form of additional compensation (including soft dollars) for the client transactions aside from the direct fee paid by clients? 9. Provide the number of similar -sized accounts with similar investment objectives currently being managed by your firm. STAFFING 10. Identify and provide background information on the key person or personnel who take the most active role(s) in the administration and management of the firm. 11. Provide resumes and biographical information on the investment professionals that will be directly involved in the decision -making process for the portfolio. Include the number of years at your firm, total years of experience, and professional licenses and designation. Include the number of accounts managed and any limits on this. 12. Describe your firm's training and education efforts to keep portfolio managers informed of developments relevant to investment managers. 13. Has there been any turnover of proposed investment managers in the last seven years? Page 13 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT 14. Summarize your fixed income assets under management for your latest reporting period. 15. Provide relevant performance statistics on a comparable portfolio and compare with industry averages or benchmarks for the last one, three, five, ten year period and/or since inception. Note whether these performance statistics are reported based on GIPS (Global Investment Performance Standards) formerly known as AIRM (Association for Investment Management and Research). 16. Have you lost any accounts in the last 12 months? If so, why? INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT APPROACH AND DISCIPLINE 17. Briefly describe your firm's investment management philosophy, including your approach to managing fixed -income portfolios. 18. Describe the mechanics of how your firm proposes to execute transactions on behalf of the City. 19. How frequently do you formulate and review fixed income strategy? How is that carried out and who is involved? 20. What are the primary strategies for adding value to portfolios (e.g. Market timing, credit research, trading)? 21. How are portfolios managed (e.g. by team or individual manager)? What is the back-up when the manager is away? 22. What oversight is provided to portfolio managers? 23. Describe your firm's in-house technical and research capabilities. Are outside sources used by the firm on a regular basis? Describe your credit review process. Does your firm assign credit research to specialists? 24. What technical analysis do you use? 25. What role does interest -rate forecasting play in your portfolio management strategy? REPORTING 26. Describe the investment accounting and reporting system used by your firm. 27. Provide a sample of reports that you would provide to the City's staff. 28. What performance benchmarks do you propose for this portfolio? FEES Page 14 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 29. Provide the complete tiered -asset fee schedule that would apply to this account. Are fees charged in arrears? 30. What additional expenses not covered through the fee structure will be expected in order to implement your investment Advisor services? ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 31. Provide a copy of your firm's most recent Form ADV Part II as on file with the SEC. 32. Describe your firm's business continuity plan and how often it is updated. 33. Provide any changes in terms and conditions from those set forth in this RFP that your firm requests or requires to be included in an agreement for this service. 34. Briefly describe any additional feature, services, attributes or conditions which the City should consider in selecting your firm. Page 15 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 REFERENCES Number of years engaged in providing the services included within the scope of the specifications under the present business name: Describe fully the five references that demonstrate your ability to provide the services included within the scope of the specifications. Please include: • Customer Name • Contact Individual • Telephone & FAX number • Street Address • City, State, Zip Code • Description of services The City reserves the right to contact each of the references listed for additional information regarding your firm's qualifications. Page 16 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 STATEMENT OF PAST CONTRACT DISQUALIFICATIONS The Proposer shall state whether it or any of its officers or employees who have a proprietary interest in it the Proposer, has ever been disqualified, removed, or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing a Federal, State, or local government project because of the violation of law, a safety regulation, or for any other reason, including but not limited to financial difficulties, project delays, or disputes regarding work or product quality, and if so to explain the circumstances. The Propose `shall c infirm :-:in writing that the staff of the Proposer who will be responsible for carrying out this Agr e r ent contract have not, within the last ten years, been convicted of any crime or pleaded nolo contendere or agreed to any consent decree with respect to any matter involving breach of trust or fiduciary duty or securities law violations. Page 17 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 Section G - INVESTMENT POLICY Page 18 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 Section H - TREASURER'S REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2011 Page 19 Investment Advisory Services RFP December 7, 2011 Section I - GRAPH - CASH BALANCES (NOT WITH FISCAL AGENT) Page 20 San Jacinto City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Prepared by: Stetson Engineers Inc. 861 Village Oaks Drive, Covina, California 91724 Phone: (626) 967-6202, Fax: (626) 331-7065 Covina, CA San Rafael, CA Mesa, AZ Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 1-1 1.2 CHANGES TO THE PLAN 1-2 1.3 WATER MANAGEMENT TOOLS 1-2 1.4 AGENCY COORDINATION, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, AND PLAN ADOPTION 1-2 CHAPTER 2 — DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE AREA 2-1 2.1 BACKGROUND [SECTION 10631 (A)] 2-1 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF AREA [SECTION 10631 (A)] 2-1 2-2 2.3 CURRENT AND PROJECTED POPULATION [SECTION 10631 (A)] CHAPTER 3 — SOURCES OF SUPPLY........ ............ .................... ... 3-1 3.1 EXISTING AND PLANNED SOURCES OF WATER SUPPLY [SECTION 10631 (B)]3-1 3.2 GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT [SECTION 10631 (B)(1), (B)(2)] 3-2 3.2.1 Groundwater Management Plan 3-2 3.3 DESCRIPTION OF GROUNDWATER BASIN [SECTION 10631(B)(2), (B)(4)] 3.3.1 Hydrogeology 3.4 PAST AND PROJECTED LOCATION, AMOUNT AND SUFFICIENCY GROUNDWATER [SECTION 10631 (B)(3), (B)(4)] ......................:. 3-3 3-3 3-4 3.5 RELIABILITY OF WATER SUPPLY TO CLIMATE [SECTION 10631 (C)] 3-4 3.6 EXCHANGES AND TRANSFERS [SECTION 10631 (D)] 3-5 3.6.1 Long -Term..... ...., 3-5 3.6.2 Short -Term 3-5 CHAPTER 4 WATER USE 4-1 4.1 PAST AND CURRENT WATER USE [SECTION 10631 (E)(1)] 4-1 4.2 PROJECTED WATER USE [SECTION 10631 (E)(2)] 4-2 CHAPTER 5 - CURRENT CONSERVATION MEASURES 5-1 5.1 DEMAND MANAGEMENT MEASURES AND IMPLEMENTATION [SECTION 10631 (F)] 5-2 DMM 1 — Water Survey Programs for Single Family Residential and Multi - Family Residential Customers [Section 10631 (f)(1)(A)] 5-2 5.1.2 DMM 2 — Residential Plumbing Retrofit [Section 10631 (f)(1)(B)] 5-2 5.1.3 DMM 3 — System Water Audits, Leak Detection and Repair [Section 10631 (f)(1)(C)] 5-2 5.1.4 DMM 4 —Metering with Commodity Rates for all New Connections and Retrofit of Existing Connections [Section 10631 (f)(1)(D)] 5-3 5.1.5 DMM 5 — Large Landscape Conservation Programs and Incentives [Section 10631 (f)(1)(E)] 5-3 5.1.6 DMM 6 — High -efficiency Washing Machine Rebate Programs [Section 10631 (f)(1)(F)] 5-4 5.1.7 DMM 7 — Public Information Programs [Section 10631 (f)(1)(G)] 5-4 5.1.8 DMM 8 — School Education Programs [Section 10631 (f)(1)(H)] 5-4 5.1.9 DMM 9 — Conservation Programs for Commercial, Industrial and Institutional 5-5 5-6 5-6 . 5-6 5-6 7-4 8-1 EXISTING WATER RECLAMATION FACILITIES [SECTION 10633 (A),(B)] POTENTIAL USES OF RECYCLED WATER 10633 C 7-2 7-2 7-2 7-4 8-1 8-2 8-2 9-1 9-1 10-1 10-1 10-1 10-3 10-5 10-5 10-5 10-6 10-6 10-7 10-7 10-7 10-8 10-8 10-8 8 3 RECYCLED WATER [SECTION 10633(D-F)] CHAPTER 9 - WATER QUALITY 9.1 SAN JACINTO GROUNDWATER BASIN CHAPTER 10 — WATER SUPPLY RELIABILITY 10.1 SB 7 REQUIRED WATER USE PARAMETERS 10.1.1 BASELINE DAILY PER CAPITA WATER USE 101..2 URBAN WATER USE TARGET 7.1 MANAGEMENT OF WATER SHORTAGES [SECTION 10632 (E)] 7.2 STAGES OF ACTION [SECTION 10632 (A)] . 7.3 THREE YEAR MINIMUM WATER SUPPLY [SECTION 10632 (B)] 7.4 PREPARATION FOR CATASTROPHIC WATER SUPPLY [SECTION 10632 (C)] 7.5 PROHIBITIONS AND PENALTIES [SECTION 10632 (D), (F)] 7.6 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE IMPACTS [SECTION 10632 (G)] 7.7 WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION [SECTION 10632 (H)] . 7-4 7.8 REDUCTION MEASURING MECHANISM [SECTION 10632 (I)] CHAPTER 8 — RECYCLED WATER 8.1 8.2 [SECTIONO] PROJECTEDUSE OF EC Accounts [Section 10631 (f)(1)(I)] 5.1.10 DMM 10 — Wholesale Agency Programs 5.1.11 DMM 11 — Conservation Pricing [Section 10631 (f)(1)(K)] 5.1.12 DMM 12 — Water Conservation Coordinator [Section 10631 (f)(1)(L)] 5.1.13 DMM 13 — Water Waste Prohibition [Section 10631 (f)(1)(M)] 5.1.14 DMM 14 — Residential Ultra Low -Flush Toilet Replacement Program [Section 10631 (f)(1)(N)] CHAPTER 6 — WATER SUPPLY OPPORTUNITIES 5-7 6-1 0631 (H)] 6-1 6-1 7-1 6.1 FUTURE WATER SUPPLY PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS [SECTION 6.2 DESALINATED WATER [SECTION 10631 (I)] CHAPTER 7 — URBAN WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY ANALYSIS 7-1 ...' 7-2 10 1.3 INTERIM URBAN WATER USE TARGET 10.1.4 COMPLIANCE DAILY PER CAPITA WATER USE 10.1.5 MINIMUM WATER USE REDUCTION REQUIREMENT 10.2 ASSESSMENT OF THE RELIABILITY OF WATER SUPPLY 10.2.1 NORMAL WATER YEAR 10.2.2 SINGLE -DRY YEAR 10.2.3 MULTIPLE DRY YEARS 10.2.4 GROUNDWATER RELIABILITY 10.3 RELIABILITY INFORMATION 10.4 WATER USE REDUCTION PLAN 10.5 PROGRESS REPORT List of Tables Table 1 — Climate Table 2 — Historical Annual Production Table 3 — Projected Water Supply and Demand Table 4 — Supply Reliability Table 5 — Past, Current and Projected Water Sales Table 6 — Water Rationing Stages and Reduction Goals Table 7 — Baseline Daily Per Capita Water Use Table 8 — Projected Normal Water Year Supply and Demand Comparison Table 9 — Projected Single -Dry Year Supply and Demand Comparison Table 10 — Projected Multiple Dry Years Supply and Demand Comparison. Figure 1 — Annual Rainfall List of Figures List of Plates Plate 1 — Water Service Area, Wells and EMWD Connections Plate 2 — San Jacinto Groundwater Basin Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix gist of Appendices A — California Urban Water Management Planning Act B — Public Notification Letter and Water Use Letter C — Draft Groundwater Management Plan D - City of San Jacinto's Water Rates E - 2004 Annual Water Quality Report F — Multi -Hazard Functional Plan G — Draft Water Shortage Contingency Resolution H — EMWD Draft 2010 Plan I — City Resolution Adopting Plan J — Urban Water Management Plan Checklist iii City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Chapter 1 - Introduction Section 10620. (a) Every urban water supplier shall prepare and adopt an urban water management plan in the manner set forth in Article 3 (commencing with Section 10640). (b) Every person that becomes an urban water supplier shall adopt an urban water management plan within one year after it has become an urban water supplier. (c) An urban water supplier indirectly providing water shall not include planning elements in its water management plan as provided in Article 2 (commencing with Section 10630) that would be applicable to urban water suppliers or public agencies directly providing water, or to their customers, without the consent of those suppliers or public agencies. (d) (1) An urban water supplier may satisfy the requirements of this part by participation in area wide, regional, watershed, or basin wide urban water management planning where those plans will reduce preparation costs and contribute to the achievement of conservation and efficient water use. (2) Each urban water supplier shall coordinate the preparation of its plan with other appropriate agencies in the area, including other water suppliers that share a common source, water management agencies, and relevant public agencies, to the extent practicable. (e) The urban water supplier may prepare the plan with its own staff, by contract, or in cooperation with other governmental agencies. (f) An urban water supplier shall describe in the plan water management tools and options used by that entity that will maximize resources and minimize the need to import water from other regions. 1.1 Urban Water Management Plan Section 10617. "Urban Water Supplier" means a supplier, either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. An urban water supplier includes a supplier or contractor for water, regardless of the basis of right, which distributes or sells for ultimate resale to customers. This Urban Water Management Plan (Plan) was prepared in accordance with the California Urban Water Management Planning Act (Act),* which became effective on January 1, 1985 (see Appendix A.1). The Act requires every "urban water supplier" to prepare and adopt an'Urban Water Management Plan, and to periodically review its Plan at least once every five years and make any amendments or changes which are indicated by the review. The City of San Jacinto's (City) Plan is an update for the year 2010. Water Code Sections 10610 through 10656. 1-1 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan The City's Plan is intended to review the activities of the City as a retail water supplier in the San Jacinto Groundwater Basin (Basin) and to describe the operations of the Basin to achieve the maximum practicable conservation and efficient use of the water resources of the area, both local and imported. 1.2 Changes to the Plan Section 10621. (a) Each urban water supplier shall update its plan at least once every five years on or before December 31, in years ending in five and zero. (b) Every urban water supplier required to prepare a plan pursuant to this part shall notify any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies that the urban water supplier will be reviewing the plan and considering amendments or changes to the plan. The urban water supplier may consult with, and obtain comments from, any city or county that receives notice pursuant to this subdivision. (c) The amendments to, or changes in, the plan shall be adopted and: filed in the manner set forth in Article 3 (commencing with Section 10640), The following are new amendments to the Act and some reorganization of the water code sections: 1) Senate Bill 1087, Requires reporting of water use projections for lower income households 2) Assembly Bill 1376, Requires 60 days notice of a public hearing on an UWMP 3) Assembly Bill 1420, Conditions state funding 4) Senate Bill 7, Requires 20 percent reduction in use by 2020 (attached in Appendix A.2) The City has reviewed its 2005 Urban Water Management Plan and included appropriate amendments and changes to its 2010 Urban Water Management Plan. 1.3 Water Managemen` This Plan describes the management tools and options used by the City to maximize resources and minimize the need to import water from other regions. The City will comply with the anticipated Groundwater Management Plan, which is discussed in Chapter 3; implements Demand Management Measures to reduce water demand whenever possible, as discussed in Chapter 5; and is involved with water supply projects to optimize the use of its groundwater supply, as discussed in Chapter 6. 1.4 Agency Coordination, Public Participation, and Plan Adoption Section 10620 (a) Every urban water supplier shall prepare and adopt an urban water management plan in the manner set forth in Article 3 (commencing with Section 10640). (b) Every person that becomes an urban water supplier shall adopt an urban water management plan within one year after it has become an urban water supplier. 1-2 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (c) An urban water supplier indirectly providing water shall not include planning elements in its water management plan as provided in Article 2 (commencing with Section 10630) that would be applicable to urban water suppliers or public agencies directly providing water, or to their customers, without the consent of those suppliers or public agencies. (d) (1) An urban water supplier may satisfy the requirements of this part by participation in area wide, regional, watershed, or basin wide urban water management planning where those plans will reduce preparation costs and contribute to the achievement of conservation and efficient water use. (2) Each urban water supplier shall coordinate the preparation of its plan with other appropriate agencies in the area, including other water suppliers that share a common source, water management agencies, and relevant public agencies, to the extent practicable. (e) The urban water supplier may prepare the plan with its own staff, by contract, or in cooperation with other governmental agencies. Section 10621 (b) Every urban water supplier required to prepare a plan pursuant to this part shall, ;;at least 60 days prior to the public hearing on the plan required by Section 10642, notify any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies that the urban water supplier will be reviewing the plan and considering amendments or changes to the plan. The urban water supplier may consult with, and obtain comments from, any city or county that receives notices pursuant to this subdivision. Section 10631 (k) Urban water suppliers that rely upon a wholesale agency for a source of water, shall provide the wholesale agency with water use projections from that agency for that source of water in five-year increments to 20 years or as far as data is available. The wholesale agency shall provide information to the urban water supplier for; inclusion in the urban water supplier's plan that identifies and quantifies, to the extent possible, the existing and planned sources of water as required by subdivision (b), available from the wholesale agency to the urban'water supplier over the same five-year increments, and during various water -year types in accordance with subdivision (c). An urban water supplier may rely upon water supply information provided by the wholesale agency in fulfilling the plan informational requirements of subdivisions (b) and (c). Section 10635 (b) The urban water supplier shall provide that portion of its urban water management plan prepared pursuant to this article to any city or county within which it provides water supplies no later than 60 days after submission of its urban water management plan. Section 10642 Each urban water supplier shall encourage the active involvement of diverse social, cultural, and economic elements of the population within the service area prior to and during the preparation of the plan. Prior to adopting a plan, the urban water supplier shall make the plan available for public inspection and shall hold a public hearing thereon. Prior to the hearing, notice of the time and place of hearing shall be published within the jurisdiction of the publicly owned water supplier pursuant to Section 6066 of the Government Code. The urban water supplier shall provide notice of the time and place of hearing to any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies. A privately owned water supplier shall provide an equivalent notice within its service area. After the hearing, the plan shall be adopted as prepared or as modified after the hearing. Section 10643 An urban water supplier shall implement its plan adopted pursuant to this chapter in accordance with the schedule set forth in its plan. Section 10644 1-3 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (a) An urban water supplier shall file with the department and any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies a copy of its plan no later than 30 days after adoption. Section 10645 Not later than 30 days after filing a copy of its plan with the department, the urban water supplier and the department shall make the plan available for public review during normal business hours. The City mainly produces groundwater from the Basin. The City is within the boundaries of Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) and has historically purchased minor amounts of treated imported water on an emergency basis to supplement groundwater supplies. EMWD is a wholesale water agency that obtains imported water from the Metropolitan Water District Southern California (MWD). The City has received the Urban Water Management Plans prepared by both EMWD and MWD. The City notified EMWD, the County of Riverside, and the City of San Jacinto of the preparation of its 2010 Plan. Copies of the notification letters to the agencies are in Appendix B.1. In addition, the City informed all parties and other potentially affected agencies to participate in the development of the 2010 Plan by providing comments. The City has provided EMWD with water use projections and existing/planned sources of water through email as required by Section 10631(k) of the California Water Code, as shown in Appendix B.2. EMWD provided the City with water use projections and existing/planned sources of water, as shown in Appendix B.2. The City does not provide water outside its City boundaries and therefore has not notified adjacent cities. [Stetson tp iu it sentence here if,anyor e provided cc mme The City reviewed and implemented its 2005 Plan in accordance with the schedule set forth in the 2005 Plan. The City prepared its 2010 draft Plan and provided at least a 60- day notice of preparation of its 2010 Plan to all relevant public agencies, cities and counties, as shown in Appendix B.1. The City also provided a 2-week notice of a public hearing of its 2010 Draft Plan to all relevant public agencies, water companies, cities, and counties. The City made the Draft 2010 Plan available at [place] for public review and published a notice of the public review in the City Clerk's office, the City's website and in a local newspaper, as shown in Appendix B.3. The notice of public hearing was published and distributed to allow involvement of local governments, social, cultural, and economic community groups. In addition, public notification along with a copy of the Draft Plan was provided to EMWD, the City of San Jacinto and the County of Riverside. Public notification of the review period is required pursuant to Section 10642 of the California Water Code. The City held a public hearing on City staff reviewed this Plan and comments from the review were incorporated into the final Plan. Following the public hearing, the City adopted the Draft Plan on [date], as its Plan. A copy of the minutes showing the City adopted the Plan is shown in Appendix I. The City sent a notice of intention to adopt its Draft Plan to EMWD, the City of San Jacinto and the County of Riverside, as shown in Appendix BA. Within 30 days of adoption of the Plan by the City, a copy of the Plan is to be filed with 1-4 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan the State of California, Department of Water Resources (DWR), the State of California Library, the County of Riverside and the City of San Jacinto. Copies of the letters to DWR, the State Library and the City of San Jacinto and the County of Riverside are located in Appendix B.5. A copy of the final 2010 Plan is available for public review in the City's [place]. 1-5 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Chapter 2 - Description of Service Area Section 10631. A plan shall be adopted in accordance with this chapter and shall do the following: (a) Describe the service area of the supplier; including current and projected population, climate, and other demographic factors affecting the supplier's water management planning. The projected population estimates shall be based upon data from the state, regional, or local service agency population projections within the service area of the urban water supplier and shall be in five-year increments to 20 years or as far as data is available. 2.1 Background [Section 10631 (a) The City owns and operates a water distribution system serving a portion of the City of San Jacinto. The remaining portion of the City is served by EMWD and Lake Hemet Municipal Water District (LHMWD). The City operates under the Public Water System (PWS) Identification Number CA3310032. The City was incorporated on April 9, 1888. The City has about 4,050 service connections serving a population of approximately 14,200 people. Following is a breakdown of the Disttt' service connections by customer type. • Resi • Corr • Industrial service connections vice connections ections • Irrigation — 190 rvic Gpnections The C Jacinto south by t surrounding t activity. ion 10631 (a)] outhwesterly part of Riverside County at the base of the San enerally bounded on the north by the City of Beaumont, the met and the west by the City of Moreno Valley. The area is predominantly rural and supports farming and agricultural The climate in the City of San Jacinto is moderate. Summers are warm and winters are mild. The average temperature ranges from 52.3 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) in January to 80.3 °F in August, as shown on Table 1. The average rainfall ranges from 2.8 inches in February to 0.1 inches in June and July, as shown on Table 1. The Evapotranspiration ranges from 1.9 inches January and December to 6.5 inches July, as shown on Table 1. There are no other demographic factors affecting water management. 2-1 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Rainfall data, shown in Figure 1, has been compiled from the National Climatic Center records for San Jacinto over the 50-year period from 1950 to 1999 and from Riverside County Flood Control District over a 10-year period from 2000 to 2010. The City's 60- year average annual rainfall is about 11.7 inches per year. Over the same period of time, the historical high precipitation was 25.61 inches in 1993 and the historical low was 3.7 inches in 2002. The City relies almost exclusively on groundwater pumped b Plate 1. The wells produce groundwater from the Basin, wh 60 square miles, as shown on Plate 2. The Basin is drat:e and is recharged by surface runoff from adjacent mountains and h on the valley floor and by return flow from water appliedfrom overlyin serves as a natural storage reservoir and filtering seem Tor wells cons 2.3 Current and Projected Population [Section 1631 (a)] r wells, as shown on givers an area of about San Jacinto River rainfall directly s. The Basin 9d therein. The City of San Jacinto occupies an area of about 2.8 square miles and had a population estimated at 51,300 duringcalendar year 2010 the Census. However, the City's water system provides waterto about 29.6 percentf the total population. Therefore, this percentage was used e* to the population`'City's water system provides water to, which is estimated o be abut 15,200 people (51,300 x 29.6%) during calendar year 2010. The population water service area is 2020 at about 6 00 mete i o about 23,000 people. The a comparison of the estimated historic and projected San Jacinto and the area included in the City service 2030. estimated to be built .p following tabulatio population of th area from calrr 1 197 1980 1990 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2,5 4,38 7,098 16,21Q 51"300 68, 700 80,900 87,000 92,200 Source ensus Census Census Census Census Census Census SCAG SCAG SCAG SCAG SCAG Population Served by San Jacinto Water District 1,778 (Est.) 2,553 (Est.) 4,385 (Est.) 7,098 (Est.) 9,000 (Est.) 12,200 (Est.) 13,200 (Est.) 15,200 (Est.) 18,700 (Est.) 23,000 (Est.) 23,000 (Est.) 23,000 (Est.) Percent Increase 44 72 62 27 36 8 15 23 23 0 0 2-2 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Chapter 3 - Sources of Supply Section 10631. (b) Identify and quantify, to the extent practicable, the existing and planned sources of water available to the supplier over the same five-year increme' described in subdivision (a). If groundwater is identified as an existing or plane source of water available to the supplier, all of the following information shall ben ludt in the plan: 1. A copy of any groundwater management plan adopt e by the rh n water supplier, including plans adopted pursuant to Part 2.7,5 (commencing Witt Section 10750), or any other specific authorization for groundwater nnagement 2. A description of any groundwater basin or basins fro 'which the urban *afer supplier pumps groundwater. For those basinor which a court or the boar adjudicated the rights to pump groundwate ` a copy of, the order or decre adopted by the court of the board and a description of the amount of groundwater the urban water supplier has the legal right to ump undel .order or decree. For basins that have not been adjudicated, in orma i as to whether the department has identified the basin or basins as overcrtfed or has projected that the basin will become over drafted if present manage m`en conditions continue, in the most current official departmental bulletin that characterizes the condition of the groundwater basin, and a detailed description of the efftrtbeing undertaken by the urban water supplier to eliminate the long-term overdrafton. 3. A detailed description and analysis of the location, amount, a sufficiency of groundwater pumped by the urban water supplier for the pa five years. The description and analysis shall be based on information that is reasonably available, including, but not limited to, historic use records. 4. A detailed description and analysis of the amount and location of groundwater that is projected to be pumped by the urban water supplier. The description and analysis shall be based on information that is reasonably available, including, but not limited to, historic use records. (c) Describe the reliability of the water supply and vulnerability to seasonal or climatic shortage, to the extent practicable, and provide data for each of the following: An average water year. 2. A single dry water year. 3. Multiple dry water years. Describe the opportunities for exchanges or transfers of water on a short-term or long-term basis. 3.1 Existing and Planned Sources of Water Supply [Section 10631 (b)] The City has two sources of water supply: groundwater from the Basin and treated imported water from EMWD, as shown in Tables 2 and 3. Historically, 100 percent of the City's water supply is from groundwater. The City's potential sources of supply consist of four active wells, two treatment facilities, and three service connections to EMWD, which are all described below. The Grand Well is located in the westerly portion of the City's service area, as shown on Plate 1. The Grand Well is 650 feet deep, is perforated from 200 feet to 650 feet below ground surface (bgs) and has a capacity of about 1,700 gallons per minute (gpm). 3-1 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan The Bath Well is located in the easterly portion of the City's service area as shown on Plate 1. The Bath Well is 1,320 feet deep, is perforated from 340 feet to 1,300 feet bgs and has a capacity of 1,700 gpm. The Artesia Well is located in the easterly portion of the City's service area as shown on Plate 1. The Artesia Well is 1,210 feet deep, is perforated from 390 feet to 1,000 feet bgs and has a capacity of 1,650 gpm. The Lake Park Well is located east of the City's service area as shown on Plate 1. The Lake Park Well is 1,200 feet deep, is perforated from 625 feet to 1,180 feet bgs and has a capacity of 2,800 gpm. The City currently owns and operates two Iron'" and Manganese treatment facilities which are located at the Grand and Bath W f sites.,The Iron and Manganese concentrations in the Grand and Bath Wells exceed secondarymaximum contaminant levels (MCLs) and are not be suitable for potable uut treatment. The Iron and Manganese treatment facilities include three dual metf iltering vessels consisting of Anthracite and greensand. The treatment facility at the Grx Well site has a maximum capacity of about 1,350 gpm and tj treatment facility at he Bath Well site has a maximum capacity of about 1,500 gp The City has three connection at Hewitt Idyllwild and Tiger Fe and Esplana groundwater ,fr However, the City years 1995 through month at o. 3.2.1 Local water (GWMP) in No service connections to Wi mown on Plate 1. The vans has a capacity of abo 2,000 gpm; the connection at capacity of Tout 600 gpm; and the connection at Santa ty of about Op gpm. Historically, the City has relied on aking up 100 percent of the City's total water supply. red treated imported water from EMWD during calendar 006 and 2008 primarily during summer own on Table 2, due to mechanical failure nt [Section 10631 (b)(1), (b)(2)] nagement Plan the Basin have developed a Groundwater Management Plan 2007 for the San Jacinto -Hemet Valley to effectively manage the groundwater basin, allocate and protect groundwater resources, and maintain local control over those resources, as shown in Appendix C. Under the GWMP, the City will be allocated an annual quantity of water it may pump from the groundwater basin that is free of replacement water assessments. In the event the City exceeds its annual pumping allocation, the City will be required to purchase replacement water for the Basin. 3-2 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan 3.3 Description of Groundwater Basin [Section 10631(b)(2), (b)(4)] The City water system is primarily reliant on four wells which pump from the Basin. The City's 2005 Water Master Plan notes the general boundaries of the Basin are the Casa Loma Fault on the southwest, which separates it form the Hemet and Lakeview groundwater basins; the San Jacinto Fault on the northeast, along the base of the San Jacinto Mountains; Valle Vista in the southeast and Moreno in th nort west. The Basin is a structural trough located between two faults that have been filled with layered alluvial materials, including clay, silt, sand and gravel. The ty's wells overlie a part of the Basin called the "Pressure Area". The Basin in this region erally divided into an upper, unconfined aquifer and lower confined aquifer. The '`gro dwater in the deeper aquifer is typically under pressure due to the peace of a relatly}impervious, confining layer which provides some separation between the upper and tower aquifers. The Grand Well has been constructed to a depth of 650 feet and pumps primarily from the upper aquifer. The Bath Well, Artesia WekL and Lake Park Well have been constructed to a depth of approximately 1,300 feet, I g feet, and 1 00 feet respectively, and the primary water source is the low The Department of Water Resourc in overdraft. 3.3.1 Hydrogeology DWR describes th Water Bearir that have filled va The valley fill deposit depths I y f All reac butt' exc remont faultsKY en the Casa lletin 118 does not identify the Basin as being its Bulletin 118. That report notes: he San Jacint erlying canyon - out 9 e undwater Basin contains sediments cised into crystalline basement rock. younger and older alluvium. Maximum e western and northern parts of the Basin, eastern part of the Basin between the Casa Loma and und.rater is found in the eastern part of the Basin font fault. Wells in this Basin produce 200 to 2,600 The yoalluvium m the southeastern part of the Basin is generally coarse and permeable with. specific yeld estimated to range from about 12 to 15 percent. In other parts of the i , speotic yield is estimated to be about 5 to 10 percent. The older alluviurmay correlate to sediments of Pleistocene age that are exposed in the San Timoteo Badlands and underlies the San Jacinto River near the confluence of Bautista Creek. These sediments generally contain more fine material and have lower specific yield and transmissivity values than the younger alluvium. Restrictive Structures. The San Jacinto fault zone cuts through the eastern part of the Basin and is composed of five northwest trending sediments: the San Jacinto, 3-3 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Claremont, Hot Springs, Park Hill, and Casa Loma faults. These active faults are barriers to groundwater movement. Recharge Areas. Natural recharge to the Basin is primarily from percolation of flow in the San Jacinto River and its tributary stream and from infiltration of rainfall on the valley floor. The primary recharge area for the confined aquifers is found where the San Jacinto River and Bautista Creek enter the San Jacinto Valley. Percolation of water stored in Lake Perris has been an additional source of recharge since construction of the lake in the 1970s. Groundwater Level Trends. Prior to the extraction of groundwater from the Basin, groundwater flow was generally along the course of the San Jacinto River and westward out of the Basin. High extraction rates had produced groundwater depressions and locally reversed the historical flow pattern. During the 1960s, groundwater levels in the western and central parts of the Basin declined; whereas, in the south-central part of the Basin, they were moderately stable. During the 1970s through the 1990s, groundwater levels declined about 20 to 40 feet in the northern and southwestern parts of the Basin and were relatively stable in the southern part of the Basin. During the 1970s through the 1980s, groundwater levels rose 80 to 200 feet in the western part of the Basin because of infiltration from Lake Perris. Groundwater Storage. The estimated, groundwater storage capacity of the Basin is 3,070,000 acre feet. In 1975, the calculated amount of groundwater in storage was 2,700,000 acre feet. 3.4 Past and Projected Location, Amount and Sufficiency Groundwater [Section 10631 (b)(3), (b)(4)] The City along with EMWD, LHMWD' the City of Hemet and private producers rely on the Basin for' groundwater supplies. The Basin historically had not been managed. However, local agencies are developing a proposed GWMP to maintain long-term reliability of groundwater supplies. A final copy of the proposed GWMP is included in Appendix C. During the City's dry single year and multiple dry year sequence, the City was able to meet its demands, as shown in Table 2 which is based on metered data. Due to the City's GWMP and wells, the City is expected to meet its demands within the next 20 years during a normal year, as shown on Table 3. Due to the City's GWMP, the City is also expected to meet its demands within the next 20 years during a single dry year and multiple dry year sequence, as shown in Table 4. 3.5 Reliability of Water Supply to Climate [Section 10631 (c)] The City water system is primarily dependent on groundwater supplies from the Basin to meet water demands although historic short-term mechanical failure at a City well resulted in the purchase of treated imported water. The City, along with other local 3-4 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan water agencies, has developed a proposed GWMP. According to the rainfall data on Figure 1, the 60-year average rainfall within the City's service area is about 11.7 inches. Calendar year 2003 represents an average water year for the City in which the total amount of rainfall was about 13.6 inches. A single dry year for the City was experienced in 2004 in which the total amount of rainfall was about 7.6 inches. A multiple dry year sequence for the City is represented from 2006 to 2009. During those years, the total amount of rainfall was about 8.8, 6.5, 11.3, and 7; Table 4 shows that during an average year, single dry year a City's supplies met its customer's demands. Therefore, the factors do not affect the City's supply. In addition, there ar, inconsistent sources of supply. 3.6 Exchanges and Transfers [Sectio 3.6.1 Long -Term 631 (d)] The City does not have long-term exchanges or transfer of water. 3.6.2 Short -Term ekes respectively. ultiple dry years, the e and environmental factors resulting in The City may purchase water from EMWD thro free interconnections. The three interconnections have a total capacity of ppro imately 3T A9 7gpm. Historically, the City has relied on EMWD f rchased treater %sported water�only for emergency supplies, as shown in Table 3-5 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Chapter 4 — Water Use Section 10631. (e) (1) Quantify, to the extent records are available, past and current watt same five-year increments described in subdivision (a), and proj identifying the uses among water use sectors including, but not n all of the following uses: (A) Single-family residential. (B) Multifamily. (C) Commercial. (D) Industrial. (E) Institutional and governmental. (F) Landscape. (G) Sales to other agencies. (H) Saline water intrusion barriers, g7t Jwater c barge, or conjunctive use, or any combinatio (I) Agricultural (2)The water use projections shall be in the same five-yei subdivision (a). 4.1 Past and Current Water UsfSectn,11D631 The City maintains,.. which it occasional industrial, irri available fora water sales are sho a During calendar year 2 Records of water sales an group are shown on Table 5 service area. ver the water use, Warily limited to, ements described in of groundw productiod end treated imported water, from EMWD Water is sold to residential, commercial, customers. Igor to 2009, historical records are not tustorner group, as" shown on Table 5. Historical annual e City had -a total of about 4,050 service connections. ber of meters during calendar year 2009 by customer City does not have low-income housing within its The City water system historically has served primarily single family residential customers and the City does not anticipate that trend will change over the next 20 years. Table ;2 indicates the water use per customer has remained relatively constant over the past 20 years indicating no significant influx of large (commercial, industrial, agricultural) water users. Much of the agricultural water use is from privately owned wells and not associated with the City. The growth over the next 20 years of the City's water system will likely consist of additional single family residences. Current and historical water uses are presented in Tables 2 and 5. The City's estimated unaccounted system water loss is about 2 percent. The City does not have other additional water uses. 4-1 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan 4.2 Projected Water Use [Section 10631 (e)(2)] The projected water use by customer group is shown in Table 5. Chapter 2 indicates the City water system's future population is estimated to increase from about 15,200 people in 2010 to about 23,000 people in 2030. The City does not have low-income housing within its service area. The City anticipates providing all future demands from its groundwater sources. The GWMP for the Basin will enhance the City's ability to rely solely on groundwater. In the event of mechanical failure to any of the City's wells, the City has connections with EMWD to provide sufficient imported water supply until the equipment is repaired or replaced. 4-2 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Chapter 5 — Current Conservation Measures Section 10631. (f) Provide a description of the supplier's water demand managemeeasures. This description shall include all of the following: 1. A description of each water demand management mas fire being implemented, or scheduled for implementation; inclu necessary to implement any proposed measures, clung, but ni all of the following: (A) Water survey programs for single-family residential and multi - residential customers. (B) Residential plumbing retrofit. (C) System water audits, leak detectro and repai (D) Metering with commodity rates for ott mew connieut, ps and retrofit of existing connections. (E) Large landscape conservation programsidtncentives. (F) High -efficiency washing machine rebate prc grams (G) Public information'prtns. (H) School education p (I) Conservation progra accounts. (J) Wholesale agency progr;fns. (K) Conservation pricing. conservation coordfl prohibition. "tra-low-flush toll t replacement programs. 2. ale of imp nentation for all water demand management measures propo in the plan. 3. A description oft m thod if any, thatthe supplier will use to evaluate the effectiveness o ' water o management measures implemented or 'bed under e plan. le, of existing conservation savings on water use within the s t} r s servic area and the effect of the savings on the supplier's ability Ott# er reduces end. An evaluation of each water demand management measure listed in paragraph (1) of bdivision (1) the is nor currently being implemented or scheduled for fementation. In the course of the evaluation, first consideration shall be given to demand management measures, or a combination of measures, that offer lowincremental costs than expanded or additional water supplies. This evaluation shall do /I of the f #owing: 1. fi'ake info' account economic and non -economic factors, including env, ri ental, social, health, customer impact, and technological factors. 2. Include a cost -benefit analysis, identifying total benefits and total costs. 3. Include a description of funding available to implement any planned water supply project that would provide water at a higher unit cost. 4. Include a description of the water supplier's legal authority to implement the measure and efforts to work with other relevant agencies to ensure the implementation of the measure and to share the cost of implementation. s currently e steps ttted to, ial, industrial and institutional 5-1 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan 5.1 Demand Management Measures and Implementation [Section 10631 (f)] The City is not a signatory to the Memorandum of Understanding regarding Urban Water Conservation in California and not a member of the California Urban Water Conservation Council (CUWCC). Each of the 14 water Detnd Management Measures (DMM) [Section 10631 (f)] are addressed in the sects ns below. The City plans to coordinate with EMWD and MWD on the DMMs. 5.1.1 DMM 1 — Water Survey Programs for Single Family Residential and Multi - Family Residential Customers [Section 10 1 (t O1)(A)] City staff regularly reviews water usage within the service area. If the Cityfinds that a customer has an unusually high water con;u[ ption, City staff may corn�ct field inspections, check customer meters for accuracyand review historical water usage in an attempt to identify the cause of the high usage or both indoor and outdoor water surveys. In addition, the City will endeavor to educed stomers on how to find leaks and read meters. It is unknown when the program first d. Historical survey data is not readily available and the number of surveys is not readily vailable. The evaluation of the effectiveness is not readily available. The estimate existing conservation savings on water use and the effect of such savings are not ready available. 5.1.2 DMM 2 — Residential Plumbing Retrofit [Section 10631 (f)(1)(B)] The City is interested in expanding its water conservation programs and plans to coordinate with EMWD and MWD to implement an agreement for participation in the distribution of low flow showerheads, toilet displacement devices, toilet flappers and faucet aerators to City customers. This conservation program will be designed to increase indoor water use efficiency and assist the City in conserving water. The City plans to inform all its customers within its service area of EMWD and MWD's residential plumbing retrofit programs available. More information on devices provided to customers, quantifications and implementation can be found in EMWD's 2010 Plan and MWD's 2010 Plan. It is unknown when the program first started. The evaluation of the effectiveness and the estimates of existing conservation savings on water use and the effect of such savings are not readily available. 5.1.3 DMM 3 — System Water Audits, Leak Detection and Repair [Section 10631 (f)(1)(C)] The City established an Ordinance for Water Conservation and Water Supply Shortage Program and Regulations (Water Conservation Ordinance) on January 22, 2009, as shown in Appendix G. Section E.5 of the City's Water Conservation Ordinance states, "Excessive use, loss or escape of water through breaks, leaks or other malfunctions in the water user's plumbing or distribution system for any period of time after such escape of water should have reasonably been discovered and corrected and in no event more than 72 hours of receiving notice from the City of San Jacinto, is prohibited." 5-2 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan In addition, City staff regularly inspects the water system to identify potential leaks from underground water pipelines, wells, pumps and reservoirs. In addition, the City has a program to compare metered water production (at wells) to metered customer sales on a monthly basis. A discrepancy of more than 10 percent will serve as an indication for City staff to conduct additional field inspections and meter checking in an attempt to identify the cause of the discrepancy. The City conducts this program monthly, and an audit was last completed in November 2010 and the next audit will be completed the following month, December 2010. As previously mentioned in Chapter 4, the City's unaccounted water loss is about 2 percent. The actual historical audits are not readily available. The evaluation of the effectiveness is not readily available. The estimates of existing conservation savings on water use and t effect of such savings are not readily available. 5.1.4 DMM 4 — Metering with Commodi Retrofit of Existing Connections [Sect The City meters all water sales to its customers. As s' meters (accounts) is about 4,050. The commodity rates are based on rates. The City's commodity rates i additional charges for water use, as sh the City to offset fixed operating costs, revenue shortfalls should :water sales de started. The evaluation eke effectivene savings on wate 5.1.5 DMM 5 ion 106 cuss omers, and t omote conserva create the tier ew Connections 1::)(D)] in Chapter 2, the number of any unmetered accounts. conservation with lower ervice" charge, plus ed charge is used by reduces the possibility of It is i1t lflawn when the program first and the estimates of existing conservation ect of such 'savings are not readily available. City does not system that re d "availabil ix D. The'; Conservation Programs and Incentives nd he City has 424 commercial customers, 3 industrial ation tomgrs. The City plans to create a tiered rate structure for its irrigation, industrial and commercial meters. The City ate structure within the next 5 years. In additionthe City established a Water Conservation Ordinance on January 22, 2009, as shown in ppendi 0. Section E of the City's Water Conservation Ordinance prohibits wash; f water at all times. Under Sections El, E.2, and E.3, the City established requirements on landscape, which are discussed below. Section El — Limits on Water Hours: Watering or irrigating of lawn, landscape or other vegetated area with potable water is prohibited between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Pacific Standard Time on any day, except by use of a hand-held bucket or similar container, a hand-held hose equipped with a positive self -closing water shut-off nozzle or device, or for very short periods of time for express purposes of adjusting or repairing an irrigation system. 5-3 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Section E.2 — Limit on Water Duration: Watering or irrigating of lawn, landscape or other vegetated area with potable water using a landscape irrigation system or a water device that is not continuously attended is limited to no more than fifteen minutes of watering per day per station. This subsection does not apply to landscape irrigation systems that exclusively use very low -flow drip type irrigation systems when no emitter producers more than two (2) gallons of water per hour and weather based controllers or stream rotor sprinklers that meet a 70 percent efficiency standard. Section E.3 — No Excessive Water Flow or Runoff: Wateri landscape or other vegetated area in manner that caus flow or runoff onto an adjoining sidewalk, driveway, prohibited. The evaluation of the effectiveness and the es on water use and the effect of such savings a 5.1.6 DMM 6 — High -efficiency Washing Machin fiate 10631 (f)(1)(F)] The City is interested in expandin coordinate with EMWD and MWD MWD's high efficiency washing machir re customers of EMWD and MWD's high According to EMWD machines with a high -efficiency efficiency wee designed to aid assist the City in con estimate fisting are,: rea 10 draft Plan, ing mac machine ctor of 5.0 es since 20 have receiv purchasing es. ater conservetrr ra � m nt an agree b�aram. Th rigating of any lawn, s excessive water er or ditch is savings Programs [Section rograms and plans to for participation in ity plans to inform its chine rebate programs. offea rebate of $85 for washing ess. EM'4m has provided incentives for and to date has estimated 6,624 high - incentives. This rebate program is -efficiency washing machines and to e evaluation of the effectiveness and the water use and the effect of such savings 7 DMM 7 — Publ Informs# on Programs [Section 10631 (f)(1)(G)] The distributes an annual Consumer Confidence Report to all its customers. The Consumer confidence Report identifies water quality of the City's distribution system, the impact human health and actions taken to ensure a high quality of water served to customers Ire adds# on, the City plans to inform its customers of EMWD and MWD's water conserve ti rograms. It is unknown when the program first started. The evaluation of theefFectiveness and the estimates of existing conservation savings on water use and the effect of such savings are not readily available. 5.1.8 DMM 8 — School Education Programs [Section 10631 (f)(1)(H)] The City is interested in expanding its water conservation programs and plans to coordinate with EMWD to implement an agreement for participation in EMWD's school education programs. According to EMWD's 2010 draft Plan, EMWD offers water 5-4 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan conservation programs to students in kindergarten through the twelfth grade. EMWD has a substantial school education program that promotes water conservation and all environmental education. It is unknown when the program first started. The evaluation of the effectiveness and the estimates of existing conservation savings on water use and the effect of such savings are not readily available. 5.1.9 DMM 9 — Conservation Programs for Commercial, Industrial and Institutional Accounts [Section 10631 (f)(1)(I)] As discussed in Chapter 2, the City has 424 commercial customers, 3 industrial customers, and no institutional customers. The City plans to create a tiered rate structure to promote conservation for its industrial and commercial meters. The City plans to create the tiered rate structure within the next 5 years. In addition the City established a Water Conservation Ordinance on January 22, 2009, as shown in Appendix G. Section E of the Cilty's Water Conservation Ordinance prohibits waste of water at all times. Under Sections E.6, E.8,' E.9, E.10, E.11, E.12, and E.13, the City established' which are discussed below. Section E.6 — Re -circulating Water Required for, Water Fountains and Decorative Water Features: Operating a water fountain or other decorative water feature that does not use re -circulated water is prohibited. Section E.8 — Drinking Water Served Upon Request Only: Eating or drinking establishments, including but not limited to a restaurant, hotel, cafe, cafeteria, bar other public place where food or drinks are sold, served, or offered for sale, are prohibited from providing drinking water to any person unless expressly requested. Section E.9 - Commercial Lodging Establishments Must Provide Guests Option to Decline Daily Linen Services: Hotels, motels and other commercial lodging establishments must provide customers the option of not having towels and linen laundered daily. Commercial lodging establishments must prominently display notice of this option in each bathroom using clear and easily understood language. Section E.10 — No Installation of Single Pass Cooling Systems: Installation of single pass cooling systems is prohibited in buildings requesting new water service. Section El1 — No Installation of Non -re -circulating in Commercial Car Wash and Laundry Systems; Installation of non -re -circulating water systems is prohibited in new commercial conveyor car wash and new commercial laundry systems. Section E.12 — Restaurants Required to Use Water Conservation Dish Wash Spray Valves: Food preparation establishments, such as restaurants or cafes, are prohibited from using non -water conserving dish wash spray valves. 5-5 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Section E.13 — Commercial Car Wash Systems: Effective on January 1, 2010 all commercial conveyor car wash systems must have installed operational re -circulating water systems, or must have secured a waiver of this requirement from the City of San Jacinto. The actual historical survey data is not readily available. The evaluation of the effectiveness and the estimates of existing conservation savings a water use and the effect of such savings are not readily available. 5.1.10 DMM 10 — Wholesale Agency Programs The City is a retailer and not a wholesale agency Although, this prrc ram does not apply, the City coordinates with its wholesalers, and MWD) regarding water conservation opportunities. These programs are corporated by reference' 5.1.11 DMM 11 — Conservation Pricing [Secti'),(K)] As previously discussed, the City has a tiered rate str`uct e. As shown in Appendix D, the City's tiered rate structure creat s an incentive to red .ic water use. In addition, the City provides sewer service to its cu ters. However, EMD owns and operates the wastewater treatment facility. The City's s ee rate structureBaled in Appendix D. It is unknown when the program first started Tetevaluation the effectiveness and the estimates of existing conservation use} and the effect of such savings are not readily available. 5.1.12 DMM The City has des coordinator, which o with E im e ervation Coordinator [Section 10631 (f)(1)(L)] ublic Works Director as the City's water conservation n programs. In addition, the City will coordinate expands g Conservation programs. The City began 2005. The evaluation of the effectiveness and the savings on water use and the effect of such savings 51 13VIM 13 — Wa Waste Prohibition [Section 10631 (f)(1)(M)] The City es bfished an ; rdinance for Water Conservation and Water Supply Shortage Program anRegulations on January 22, 2009, as shown in Appendix G. Section E of the City's Water Conservation Ordinance prohibits waste of water at all times. The following are the subject requirements under Section E and violation of these requirements at any time is considered to be wasting water. Details of Section E can be found in Appendix G. 1. Limits on Water Hours 2. Limit on Watering Duration 3. No Excessive Water Flow or Runoff 4. No Washing Down Hard or Paved Surfaces 5-6 to Decline sh Toilet Reilment Program City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan 5. Obligation to Fix Leaks, Breaks or Malfunctions 6. Re -circulating Water Required for Water Fountains and Decorative Water Features 7. Limits on Washing Vehicles 8. Drinking Water Served Upon Request only 9. Commercial Lodging Establishments Must Provide Guests Option Daily Linen Services 10. No Installation of Single Pass Cooling Systems 11. No Installation of Non -re -circulating in Commercial r ; Wash and Laundry Systems 12. Restaurants Required to Use Water Conserving Dish Wash' pray Valves 13. Commercial Car Wash Systems Section K of the City's Water ConservationOrdinance states the penalties and violations of any requirements listed in the Cit Water Conservation Ordina '''The number of on -site visits is not readily available. Tate evaluationof the effectiveness and the estimates of existing conservation savings on orate use'`and the effect} of such savings are not readily available. 5.1.14 DMM 14 — Residential Ultr [Section 10631 (f)(1)(N)] The City is interested in expanding its water or se anon programs and plans to coordinate with EMV1 rind MWD to implement an cer ement for participation in MWD's Residential = Ult a ow -Flush ToiletRebate Program. According to EMWD's 2010 draft Plan MWDbfe s a rebate with funding through MWD. This rebate program is desi ned to aid homeowners in r placing toilets manufactured before 1992 with new, water e nt toils and to assist the City in conserving water supplies. EMWD began offer i nce es f r toilet retrofits in 1992. Incentives for High Efficiency Toilets were a d :d in 2( Its unknown when the program first started. The evaluation of the effect ness and the estimates of existing conservation savings on water use and the effect oeh savings are not readily available. 5-7 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Chapter 6 — Water Supply Opportunities Section 10631. (h) Include a description of all water supply projects and water supply programs that may be undertaken by the urban water supplier to meet the total projected water uses as established pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 10635. The urban water supplier shall include a detailed description of expected future projects and programs, other than the demand management programs identified pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (t), that the urban water supplier may implement to increase the amount of water supply available to the urban water supplier in average, single dry,; and multiple -dry water years. The description shall identify specific projects and include a description of the increase in water supply that is expected to be available from each project. The description shall include an estimate with regard to the implementation timeline for each project or program. (i) Describe the opportunities for development of desalinated water, including, but not limited to, ocean water, brackish water, and groundwater, as a long-term supply. 6.1 Future Water Supply Proiects and Progra ;Section 10631 (h)] The City, along with EMWD, LHMWD, and the City of Hemet have developed a proposed GWMP to ensure the Basin continues to provide a reliable source of supply and is discussed in Chapter 3. With the implementation of the GWMP, the City will have enough wate eet its demands in the future. As of December 2010, the City does not eft addition water supply projects or programs in the future. 6.2 Desalinated 1063:1 h+ n for th 300 p City does 3oi taav City pumps and does not t1 at Water Quality he i v's active wel ] unities to incorporate desalinated water into its supply. dwater rom the Basin which is low in Total Dissolved Solids ,lire des al ration. According to "The City of San Jacinto's 2009 ort", which is provided in Appendix E, the average TDS value about 295 parts per million (ppm) and ranges from 290 ppm 6-1 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Chapter 7 — Urban Water Shortage Contingency Analysis Section 10632. The Plan shall provide an urban water shortage contingency analysis tha of the following elements that are within the authority of the urban water (a) Stages of action to be undertaken by the urban water supplier supply shortages, including up to 50 percent reduction in water( of specific water supply conditions which are applicable to eat An estimate of the minimum water supply available durin water years based on the driest three-year historic serf supply. Actions to be undertaken by the urban water su, during, a catastrophic interruption of water su regional power outage, an earthquake, or other Additional, mandatory prohibitions against specific' shortages, including, but not limited to, prohibiting th cleaning. Consumption reduction methods tip the most restrictive s supplier may use any type of coi contingency analysis that would re have the ability to achieve a water 11 reduction in water supply. Penalties or charges for excessive use h An analysis of the impacts of each u._ sive, on the re s and expen mores of the urban water easures to o rcome those impacts, such as the rate adjustmeritS.. ency resolution or ordinance. actual reductions water use pursuant to the urban (b) (c) (d) (e) Supply additio Water subdivisions (a supplier, an developme A draft wit A mechanis water shortage ussed in Ch Shortage Progr a Water Con; Supply hortage„ s stage. each of th e ror the agen 7 tJd s each tier: onse to water d an outline three ater r to prepare for, and imple s including,y but not limited to r. ion reduction methol r use, are approp ,;,consistent with Pipes during water tablewater for street" Each urban water is water shortage or its area, and 'Ye' 50 percent dons oat itions described in Y=, Shortages [Section 10632 (e)] 5, the` ity established a Water Conservation and Water rdinance on January 22, 2009, as shown in Appendix G. In rvation Program, the Ordinance also established a three -level rogram, which is also discussed in Chapter 5. The City waterym typically relies exclusively on groundwater supplies from the Basin and has never experienced a groundwater supply shortage, regardless of the hydrologic conditions. In the event of mechanical failure of one of its wells, the City has interconnections with EMWD. However, as noted in Chapters 3 and 4 treated imported water from EMWD has been used infrequently. 7-1 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan 7.2 Stages of Action [Section 10632 (a)] The City has developed a 'four -stage' rationing plan including up to 50 percent reduction in water supply if the City experiences a water supply shortage. The City's plan includes voluntary and mandatory stages. In the event of a prolonged and severe drought, the rationing programs could be implemented as shown t Table 6. Stages I and II are voluntary stages and the customer reduction goal 'i6 percent and 20 percent, respectively. Stages III and IV are mandatory saes and the customer reduction goal is 30 percent and 50 percent or greater, res 7.3 Three Year Minimum Water Supply [Section 10632 The City's driest three-year period was 2006 City's demand was 3,858, 3,681, and 3,029 on Table 4. The City had adequate water supply from EMWD to meet its demands, as shown on Ta and historical data of meeting its demands during anticipated the City will be able to provide adequate wa three-year period. Therefore, the three-year estimated mini to the City is about 3,000 acre-feet per year from groundwater from imported water from EMWD. Consequently, the City will an average, single -dry and multiple dry year sequence. 08. During those years, the r, respectively, a shown meter and imported water Based on the City's GWMP le dry year periods, it is its customers in the next ter supply available 5 acre-feet per year ave adequate supply in 7.4 Preparation for Catastrophic Water Supply [Section 10632 (c)] The City has prepared an Emergency Operations Plan, as shown in Appendix F. The Emergency Operations Plan describes the actions the City will take during a catastrophic interruption of water supplies including, but not limited to, a regional power outage, an earthquake, or other disaster. In the event of a system failure, the City has three emergency water interconnections with EMWD. These interconnections are manually activated and can supply water in the event the City may need additional water due to a power failure or disaster. 7.5 Prohibitions and Penalties [Section 10632 (d), (f)] As previously discussed, the City established a Water Conservation and Water Supply Shortage Program Ordinance on January 22, 2009, as shown in Appendix G. Section E of the Ordnance lists all the prohibitions the City requires and Section K of the Ordinance lists the penalties for violating any of the waste water prohibitions. The following are the subject requirements under Section E and violation of these requirements at any time is considered to be wasting water. Details of Section E can be found in Appendix G. 7-2 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan 1. Limits on Water Hours 2. Limit on Watering Duration 3. No Excessive Water Flow or Runoff 4. No Washing Down Hard or Paved Surfaces 5. Obligation to Fix Leaks, Breaks or Malfunctions 6. Re -circulating Water Required for Water Fountains Features 7. Limits on Washing Vehicles 8. Drinking Water Served Upon Request only 9. Commercial Lodging Establishments Must Daily Linen Services 10. No Installation of Single Pass Cooling System 11. No Installation of Non -re -circulating in Systems 12. Restaurants Required to Use Water Coll erving Disirliyash Spray Valves 13. Commercial Car Wash Systems The following are the penalties and violations under S be found in Appendix G. 1. Misdemeanor: Any violation a punishable by imprisonment in fine not exceeding $1,000, or by 2. Penalties: Penalties for failure to follows: a. First slab n The City of San Jacinto will issue a written warning and deli e he section by mail. b. n: A second violation within the preceding 12 calendar mont p able by a fine not to exceed $25. c. Third tipo,,,within the preceding 12 calendar months is ishable a fine note eed $100. quent Violations: A fourth and any subsequent violation not to exceed $500. strictor: In addition to any fines, the City of San o ma stall a water flow restrictor device of approximately lion per minute capacity for services up to one and one-half ize and comparatively sized restrictors for larger services ritten notice of intent to install a flow restrictor for a minimum hours. e. Drs e ruing Service: In addition to any fines and the installation of a waterflow restrictor, the City of San Jacinto may disconnect a customers wafer service for willful violations of this section and adequate notice to the customer. r a copy �Violati h unis and Decorative Water Provide Guests Option to Decline mercial Car Wash and Laundry En K. ction may be pr+ 'ail for not m Details of Section K can uted as a misdemeanor an 30 days, or by a uions of the section are as 7-3 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan 7.6 Revenue and Expenditure Impacts [Section 10632 (g)] The City has developed a tiered rate structure that 1) establishes a minimum monthly fixed charge for water service and 2) rewards water conservation with lower water rates. The City is cognizant of seasonal variation of water supply and, in turn, water sales. As a result, the City has developed a rate structure that conservatively end consistently will generate sufficient fixed income, based on water connections, t Cind fixed costs. As an example, the water rates during calendar year 2009, which s provided in Appendix D, would conservatively generate about $750,000 using the ter service rate of $15.36 per customer per month and assuming all 4,050 customer were s ri l residential users. Over the same period fixed costs for staffing, insurance and runt were adequately funded. Variable costs such as repairs, cost of ener },and supplies aret[ 1 to the level of water service actually provided and will be fun ed by water sales. I addition, the City regularly reviews its revenues and expenses Therefore, the City c rates if need to. This cursory review of thett'.fixed renue and expen with the adopted rate structure indicates a redu funding deficit. ust its along ,should not result in a In the event of insufficient water sales groundwater production could be reduced by 50 percent. In fiscal year 2008-09, the Cit' revenues from water sates were about $1.8 million; which is about 60 percent of thtoa��r revenues (� million) during fiscal year 2008-09. If revenue from water spAes the City would face a reduction in its tote be faced with the funds to cover reestablished. could postpone schedules. a operas nficant re atherwis usly discusses Program Ordirr to utilize opening expenses until tions in the 's pact establis d by percent ($0.9 million), 0 percent. The City may reserve funds and/or capital reserve normal operating revenues could be operating and non -operating reserves water supply project and program ntingency Ordinance/Resolution [Section he City established a Water Conservation and Water Supply nce on January 22, 2009, as shown in Appendix G. 7.8 Reduction Measuring Mechanism [Section 10632 (i)] As previously discussed, the City established a Water Conservation and Water Supply Shortage Program Ordinance on January 22, 2009, as shown in Appendix G. Section E of the Ordinance discusses the methods of reducing water use. Sections F, G and H of the Ordinance discusses the three levels the City established during a water supply shortage. The following are the subject requirements under Section E and violation of these 7-4 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan requirements at any time is considered to be wasting water. Details of Section E can be found in Appendix G. 1. Limits on Water Hours 2. Limit on Watering Duration 3. No Excessive Water Flow or Runoff 4. No Washing Down Hard or Paved Surfaces 5. Obligation to Fix Leaks, Breaks or Malfunctions 6. Re -circulating Water Required for Water Fountains and Decorative Water Features 7. Limits on Washing Vehicles 8. Drinking Water Served Upon Request only 9. Commercial Lodging Establishments Must Provide Guests Option to Decline Daily Linen Services 10. No Installation of Single Pass Cooling Systems 11. No Installation of Non -re -circulating in Commercial Car Wash and Laundry Systems 12. Restaurants Required to Use Water Conserving Dish Wash Spray Valves 13. Commercial Car Wash Systems Below discusses the three levels established during a water supply shortage under Sections F, G, and H. The percentage of water use reductions (up to 50 percent) will be determined by the City Manager. 1. Level 1 Water Supply Shortage — Upon the declaration of a Level 1, the City will implement the mandatory Level 1 conservation measures: a. Limits on Water Days: Limit to three days per week or one day per week during November through March. b. Obligation to Fix Leaks, Breaks and Malfunctions: All leaks, breaks and malfunctions must be repaired within 72 hours of notification by the City. 2. Level 2 Water Supply Shortage — Upon the declaration of a Level 2, the City will implement the mandatory Level 2 conservation measures: a. Watering Days: Watering is limit to two days a week or one day per week during November through March. b. Obligation to Fix Leaks, Breaks and Malfunctions: All leaks, breaks and malfunctions must be repaired within 48 hours of notification by the City. c. Limits on Filling Ornamental Lakes or Ponds: Filling or re -filling ornamental lakes or ponds is prohibited, except to sustain aquatic life. d. Limits on Washing Vehicles: Using water to wash or clean vehicles is prohibited except by use of a hand-held bucket, a hand-held hose equipped with a positive self -closing water shut-off nozzle or a commercial car washing facility that utilizes a re -circulating water system. e. Limits on Filling Residential Swimming Pools and Spas: Re -filling of more than one foot with potable water is prohibited. 3. Level 3 Water Supply Shortage — Upon the declaration of a Level 2, the City will implement the mandatory Level 2 conservation measures: a. No Watering or Irrigating 7-5 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan b. Obligation to Fix Leaks, Breaks and Malfunctions: All leaks, breaks and malfunctions must be repaired within 24 hours of notification by the City. c. No New Potable Water Service d. Limits on Building Permits e. Discontinue Service f. No New Annexations 7-6 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Chapter 8 — Recycled Water Section 10633. The plan shall provide, to the extent available, information on recycled, potential for use as a water source in the service area of the urban w preparation of the plan shall be coordinated with local water, wasteti and planning agencies that operate within the supplier's service ar of the following: (a) A description of the wastewater collection and treatment stems in b service area, including a quantification of the amount of" wastewater col treated and the methods of wastewater disposal. (b) A description of the quantity of treated wasteter that meets recycled standards, is being discharged, and is otherwiseavailable for use in a recycled wa project. (c) A description of the recycled water currently being re service area, including, but not limited to, the type, place, and quanfl (d) A description and quantification of the potential uses of cycled water, including, but not limited to, agricultural irrigation, landscape ii 'i® ion, wildlife habitat enhancement, wetlands, industrialw reuse, groundwater : arge, and other appropriate uses, and a determination th regard to the tech l and economic feasibility of serving those uses. (e) The projected use of recycled water whin the�ters service aret the end of 5, 10, 15 and 20 years, and a descriptionof the tual se of -recycled water in comparison to uses previously projected pursuantto this st b ivi ton. (f A description of including final* -incentives, which may be taken to encourage th use cycled water, and7 e projected results of these actions in terms of acre feet of recycle water used per year. (g) A plan for optimizing the use of recycled meter in the supplier's service area, including actions to facilitate the installation of dual systems, to promote recirculating uses, ofact tat the increased use` of treated wastewater that meets recycled water standar tts, and -eta rcom an obstacles to achieving that increased use M aw 8.'1 Existing Wate ,and its supplier. The groundwater, II include all lier's and on Facilities [Section 10633 (a),(b)] The City does not own or operate any wastewater treatment facilities. All sewage generated within the City water system is provided to the Hemet/San Jacinto Regional Water Reclamation Facility (RWRF), which is operated by EMWD. A more thorough discussion of the RWRF is included in EMWD's 2010 Plan, which is shown in Appendix H. According to EMWD's 2010 Plan all treated wastewater is discharged into EMWD's regional recycled water distribution system. EMWD has developed over 135 miles of regional transmission pipelines which connect all four of EMWD's RWRFs, providing a flexible recycled water delivery system. In conjunction with over 6,000 acre-feet of surface storage reservoirs, these pipelines allow EMWD to sell over 90 percent to 100 percent of the treated wastewater produced in its service area. The balance of the treated recycled water is lost to incidental percolation during winter storage when 8-1 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan demands for recycled water are minimal. The amount of wastewater collected, treated and disposed is shown in EMWD's 2010 draft Plan, which is attached in Appendix H. 8.2 Potential Uses of Recycled Water [Section 10633 (c)] As noted above, EMWD owns, operates and controls all recycled water use in the City's service area. The recycled water production is sold for agricultural use, landscape, wildlife habitat, wetlands/lake, and industrial use. Prior to constructing a recycled water distribution system, the potential uses for recycled water must be identified. Potential uses of recycled water include: 1. Landscape irrigation; 2. Irrigation of community parks and schoolyards; 3. Industrial process (i.e. heating and cooling and contingent on suitable recycled water quality; 4. Car washes; 5. Residential landscaping and toilet flushing in new developments, incorporating dual piping systems for recycled and potable water. 8.3 Projected Use of Recycled Water [Section 10633(d-f)] As previously menti program at this time ,tvt, future when suppIie the City is not tech e is no recycled water available to the City for a reuse . The CityLwill look at the possibility of using recycled water in the may be Mailable. Currently, the potential use of recycled water by or economically feasible. 8-2 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Chapter 9 — Water Quality Section 10634. The plan shall include information, to the extent practicable, relating to e equality of existing sources of water available to the supplier over the same five-yearfive-yak:Increments as described in subdivision (a) of Section 10631, and the manner in hi h water quality affects water management strategies and supply reliability. 9.1 San Jacinto Groundwater Basin The City supplies water to its customers from- 3. The City tests water from each of its wells a California Department of Public Health (CDPH), as Annual Water Quality Report is presented in Append! Manganese and Iron in the raw wat(untreated) at the The City operates two groundwater tr c ' et plants for rem located at the City's Grand and Bath w lsites Air treatment City's customers meets CDPH guideline an 20 years. Therefore, the water availabl affected by the water ctive wel as described irt:Chapter r,;quality reports with the d. A copy of the City's 2009 ,which shows high levels of Grand and Bath Wells. Manganese and Iron ater delivered to the ectedo change over the next next 20 years will not be 9-1 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Chapter 10 — Water Supply Reliability 10.1 SB 7 REQUIRED WATER USE PARAMETERS Section 10608.20 (a) (1) Each urban retail water supplier shall develop urban water us t rgets and an interim urban water use target by July 1, 2011. Urban retail watersuppliers taffy elect to determine and report progress toward achieving these targets on an in vidual or regional basis, as provided in subdivision (a) of Sections 10608.28, andtrteetermine the targets on a fiscal year or calendar year basis. (2) It is the intent of the Legislature that the urban wa er use targets described i subdivision (a) cumulatively result in a 20 pertt reduction from the baseline per capita water use by December 31, 2020"� Section 10608.20 (e) An urban retail water supplier shall include in its ur required pursuant to Part 2.6 (commencing with Sect! baseline daily per capita water use, urban water use tan target, and compliance daily per capita water use, along wi determining those estimates, including references to support er management plan 10) due in 2010 the rim urban water use bases for Methodologies for calculating baseline and complianceurban per capita water use for the consistent implementation of the Water Conservation Act of 2009 have been published by DWR in its October 2010 guidance document. DWR's guidance document was used by the City to determine the required water use parameters which are discussed below. 10.1.1 BASELINE DAILY PER CAPITA WATER USE The Baseline Daily Per Capita Water Use is defined as the average water use, expressed in gallons per capita per day (GPCD), for a continuous, multi -year baseline period. There are two different baseline periods for calculating Baseline Daily Per Capita Water Use, as follows (CWC Sections 10608.20 and 10608.22): • The first baseline period is a continuous 10- to 15-year period, and is used to calculate Baseline Per Capita Water Use per CWC Section 10608.20. The first baseline period is determined as follows: o If recycled water makes up less than 10 percent of 2008 retail water delivery, use a continuous 10-year period ending no earlier than December 31, 2004, and no later than December 31, 2010. 1 California Department of Water Resources, Division of Statewide Integrated Water Management, Water Use and Efficiency Branch. Methodologies for Calculating Baseline and Compliance Urban Per Capita Water Use. October 1, 2010. 10-1 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan o If recycled water makes up 10 percent or more of 2008 retail water delivery, use a continuous 10- to 15-year period ending no earlier than December 31, 2004, and no later than December 31, 2010. The City does not use recycled water. Consequently, the first baseline period will consist of a continuous 10-year period that can be selected between 1995-96 and 2008-09. o The second baseline period is a continuous five-year period, and is used to determine whether the 2020 per capita water use target meets the legislation's minimum water use reduction per CWC Section 10608.22. The continuous five-year period shall end no earlier than December 31, 2007, and no later than December 31, 2010. The second baseline period consista continuous five-year period can be selected between 2004 and 2009.- Unless the urban water retailer's five-year Base per CWC Section 10608.12(b)(3) is 100 GPCD or le Water Use must be calculated for bth baseline perio The calculation of the Baseline Daily steps: Step 1 Step 2 aily Per Capita Water Use aseline Daily Per Capita ater Use entails the following four water use for each yearn the baseline period using DWR's guidance document. According to Methodology e is a measure of water supplied to the distribution onths and adjusted for changes in distribution system to other water suppliers that pass through the ycled'Water deliveries are to be excluded from the ss water use. Water delivered through the distribution ral use may be deducted from the calculation of gross "Jain conditions, industrial process water use also ucted from gross water use. The calculated gross water use, based on recorded groundwater use, for ach year*the baseline period is shown on Table 7. service area population for each year in the baseline period using Methodology 2 in DWR's guidance document. To obtain an accurate estimate of GPCD, water suppliers must estimate population of the areas that they actually serve, which may or may not coincide with either their jurisdictional boundaries or with the boundaries of cities. According to Methodology 2, data published by the California Department of Finance (DOF) or the U.S. Census Bureau must serve as the foundational building block for population estimates. In some instances, data published by these two sources may be directly applicable. In other 10-2 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan instances, additional refinements may be necessary. For example, to account for distribution areas that do not match city boundaries, customers with private sources of supply, or other unique local circumstances, water suppliers may have to supplement the above sources of data with additional local data sources such as county assessor data, building permits data, and traffic analysis zone data. These refinements are acceptable as long as they arerconsistently applied over time, and as long as they build upon populatio i°'da` sources of the DOF or the U.S Census Bureau. The City's service area population for each year in t based on the U.S. Census Bureau data (e Table 7). Step 3 Calculate daily per capita water uss Divide gross water use (determi (determined in Step 2). reline period was or each year in the baseline period. in Step 1 by service area population The calculated daily per capita water period is shown on Table 7. Step 4 Calculate Baseline Dar capita water use by sum' by the number of years in the basai Per Capita Water Use for fhb sele ne periot alue o use ;.rµ Thar capita daily water use that is estimated using the sum of the following performance standards: (A) For indoor residential water use, 55 gallons per capita daily water use as a provisional standard. Upon completion of the department's 2016 report to the Legislature pursuant to Section 10608.42, this standard may be adjusted by the Legislature by statute. (B) For landscape irrigated through dedicated or residential meters or connections, water efficiency equivalent to the standards of the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance set forth in Chapter 2.7 (commencing with Section 490) of Division 2 of Title 23 of the California Code of Regulations, as ita r each year in the baseline Water Us . Calculate average per es calculatedan Step 3 and dividing od. The result is Baseline Daily eriod. capita watn use calculated for a continuous 10-year first baseline period) is shown on Table 7, with the 8 GPCD. e City was determined to be 218 GPCD, alculated ra continuous 10-year period (first baseline see Table 7). r supplier shall adopt one of the following methods for an water use target pursuant to subdivision (a): nt of the urban retail water supplier's baseline per capita daily water 10-3 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan in effect the later of the year of the landscape's installation or 1992. An urban retail water supplier using the approach specified in this subparagraph shall use satellite imagery, site visits, or other best available technology to develop an accurate estimate of landscaped areas. (C) For commercial, industrial, and institutional uses, a 10-percent reduction in water use from the baseline commercial, industrial, and institutional water use by 2020. (3) Ninety-five percent of the applicable state hydrologic region target, as set forth in the state's draft 20x2020 Water Conservation Plan (dated April 30, 2009). If the service area of an urban water supplier includes more than one hydrologic region, the supplier shall apportion its service area to each region based on population or area. (4) A method that shall be identified and developed by the department, through a public process, and reported to the Legislature no later than December 31, 2010. The method developed by the department shall identify per capita targets that cumulatively result in a statewide 20-percent reduction in urban daily per capita water use by December 31, 2020. In developing urban daily per capita water use targets, the department shall do all of the following: (A) Consider climatic differences within the state. (B) Consider population density differences within the scat (C) Provide flexibility to communities and regions in meeting the targets. (D) Consider different levels of per capita water use according to plant water needs in different regions. (E) Consider different levels of commercial, industrial, and institutional water use in different regions of the state. (F) Avoid placing an undue hardship on communities that have implemented conservation measures or taken actions to keep per capita water use low. The Urban Water Use Target is determined using one of the following methods: Method 9: Eighty percent of the urban retail water supplier's Baseline Per Capita Daily Water Use. Using this method, the Urban Water Use Target for the City was calculated as 174 GPCD, based on the City's Baseline Per Capita Daily Water Use of 218 GPCD. ethod 2: Estimate using the sum of the specified three performance standards. Due to insufficient data, this method was not considered. Method 3; Ninety-five percent of the applicable state hydrologic region target, as set forth in the state's 20x2020 Water Conservation Plan.2 Based on the 20x2020 Water Conservation Plan, the City's service area lies in DWR Hydrologic Region 4 (South Coast), with an established Baseline Per Capita Daily Water Use of 180 GPCD and a Target Per Capita Daily Water Use of 149 GPCD. Using this method, 2 California Department of Water Resources, State Water Resources Control Board, California Bay -Delta Authority, California Energy Commission, California Department of Public Health, California Public Utilities Commission, and California Air Resources Board. 20x2020 Water Conservation Plan. February 2010. 10-4 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan the Urban Water Use Target for the City was calculated as 142 GPCD. Method 4: [To be developed by DWR] The City's Urban Water Use Target was determined to be 174 GPCD for 2020, based on Method 1 above. 10.1.3 INTERIM URBAN WATER USE TARGET Based on the City's Baseline Daily Per Capita Water Use. of 218 GPCD and Urban Water Use Target of 174 GPCD, the City's Interim Urba Water e,FTarget for 2015 was calculated as 196 GPCD. 10.1.4 COMPLIANCE DAILY PER CAPIT Compliance Daily Per Capita Water Use is define final year of the reporting period, and reported in Capita Water Use will be reported ip the City's 2015 Pie Plan (final compliance). 10.1.5 MINIMUM WATER USE RED Section 10608.22 Notwithstanding tli Method adopted b/ rf urban retail meter supplier pursuant to Section 008.20,a urban retail water s pplier's per capita daily water use reduction shall b no less than percent of base daily per capita water use as defined in paragraphn (b) of Section 1ft6012. This section does not apply to an urban re it watersupplier with a base dadV per capita water use at or below 100 gallons per c Water Use during the The Compliance Daily Per erim compliance) and 2020 The, !CWC Sectio rmine whether meek the legislation 106d8 22, The calcula de because -The five-year Baseline Per Capita Water Use 8.12(b)( is greater than 100 GPCD. The calculation is used to water upplier's 2015 and 2020 per capita water use targets ater use reduction requirement per CWC Section entails three steps: Step 1 calculate Baseline Daily Per Capita Water Use using a continuous five- ertd ending no earlier than December 31, 2007, and no later than er 31, 2010. This value was calculated as 218 GPCD (see Table 7). Step 2: Multiply the result from Step 1 by 0.95. The 2020 per capita water use target cannot exceed this value (unless the water supplier's five-year Baseline Per Capita Water Use is 100 GPCD or less). If the 2020 target is greater than this value, reduce the target to this value. 10-5 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan Step 3: This value was calculated as 207 GPCD. The City's 2020 Urban Water Use Target was determined using Method 3 above to be 174 GPCD, which is lower than the value calculated in this step. Therefore, no adjustment is needed for the City's 2020 Urban Water Use Target of 174 GPCD. Set the 2015 target to mid -point between the 10- or gear Baseline Per Capita Water Use and the 2020 target determined in step°2. The City's 2015 Interim Urban Water Use Tar GPCD, which is the same value determined j Therefore, the City's 2015 Interim Urban Water Urban Water Use Target of 174 GPCD mee reduction requirement per CWC Section 1060a efore set at 196 ectio 1°0.1.3 above. rget of 196 legislation's minim 10.2ASSESSMENT OF THE RELIABILITY O ATER SUPPLY Section 10635 (a) service r to Se poputf Every urban water supplier shal i an assessment of the reliability dry, and multiple dry years. This„ wate compare the total water supply sources ava projected water use over the next 20 ye water year, ,;a : n ry year water year and multiple day water years. The water ent shall be based upon the information compiled pursuant ing available data from state, regional, or local agency in the service area of the urban water supplier. and 2020 ter use ity 10631, me ojections of its urban afar management plan, ice to its custom rs during normal, nd demapd assessment shall iter supplier with the total crements, for a normal As previously discusseCity applied Senate Bill No. 7 to estimate the City's 2015 Interim Uri Water UsTarget of 196 GPCD and the City's 2020 Urban Water Use Target of 174yTMGPCD. These Urban Water Use Targets were then applied to estimate the City's p jaded normal year supplies in 2015, 2020, 2025 and 2030. However, the City estima buildout by 2020 at an estimated demand of 4,271 acre-feet or 166 GPCD, which is than the required 2015 and 2020 Urban Water Use Targets of 196 GPCD and 174 GPCD, respectively, as shown on Table 3. Therefore, the City expects to meet its 2015 and 2020 Urban Water Use Targets. The City will continue to use groundwater as its future water supplies over the next 20 years. The following sections discuss the City's water service reliability assessment, which compares the City's supply and demand over the next 20 years during normal, dry and multiple dry years. 10.2.1 NORMAL WATER YEAR As previously discussed, the City will meet the required 2015 and 2020 Urban Water Use Targets during a normal water year. The City's projected demand and supply was based on the estimated buildout by 2020 at 4,271 acre-feet, as shown on Table 3. The 10-6 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan comparison of the City's projected supply and demand during a normal water year is shown on Table 8. As shown on Table 8, the City's supply can meet demands during a normal water year for the next 20 years. 10.2.2 SINGLE -DRY YEAR As shown on Table 4, the City experienced a single -dry year during calendar year 2004 and a normal water year during calendar year 2003. The ratio between the normal water year and single -dry year was estimated for the City's supply and demand, as shown on Table 4. This ratio and the projected supply and demand during a normal water year from Table 8 was used to estimate the City's projected supply and demand during a single -dry year over the next 20 years in five-year increments. The comparison of the City's projected supply and demand during a single -dry year is shown on Table 9. As shown on Table 9, the City's supply can meet demands during a single -dry year for the next 20 years. 10.2.3 MULTIPLE DRY YEARS As shown on Table 4, the City experienced multiple dry years during calendar years 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009. The ratio between the normal water year in 2003 and multiple dry years were estimated for the City's supply and demand, as shown on Table 4. This ratio and the projected supply and demand during a normal water year from Table 8 was used to estimate the City's projected supply and demand during multiple dry years over the next 20 years in five-year increments. However, if this calculation was greater than testimated buildout of 4,271 acre-feet, then projected the supply/demand during mull wdry years would be capped at 4,271 acre-feet, as shown on Table 10. Thre comparisonf the City's projected supply and demand during multiple dry years is shover n Tabl 0. As shown on Table 10, the City's supply can meet demands during molt ple dry e rs for the next 20 years. the 20 y from City has historft satisfactory met ate 1980's. The eat; Demands ba abort .900 acre calendar y imported wate wells as backup LIABILI relied Ho Basin as its source to meet all demands. The City 'ater derpaids, even during the prolonged statewide drought in does ribt anticipate any water supply problems over the next on projected population increased are estimated to increase et during calendar year 2010 to about 4,271 acre-feet in rease of 1,371 acre-feet. In addition, the City has treated ions with EMWD in the event of a mechanical failure at one of its er supply. The City primarily relies on groundwater from the Basin. The City and other local water agencies are developing a GWMP, cooperatively manage water supplies and continue to pursue water management options. Consequently, the City believes its water supplies will reliably meet demand, even under multiple dry years. 10-7 City of San Jacinto 2010 Urban Water Management Plan 10.3 RELIABILITY INFORMATION Section 10635(b) The urban water supplier shall provide that portion of its urban water management plan prepared pursuant to this article to any city or county within which it provides water supplies no later than 60 days after submission of its urban water management plan. The City will provide a copy of the 2010 Plan to the folio counties no later than 60 days after submission of the 2010 1. City of San Jacinto 2. County of Riverside 3. Eastern Municipal Water District 10.4WATER USE REDUCTION PLAN Section 10608.36. Urban wholesale water suppliers shall include in the ur required pursuant to Part 2.6 (cot raencing with Section 10 their present and proposed futurees, programs, and the water use reductions required agencies, cities and DWR: er management plans an assessment of s to.help achieve The City is not an urban wholesale water sue r T e efo , this requirement is not applicable to the Cit 10.5 PROGRES The C using a s available. Urban v 1 retail sup t1 meeting them urban watera. submitted punt to Sectic form develop e pursuant td shall report to the department on their progress in targets as part of their urban water management plans 1D631. The data shall be reported using a standardized ction 10608.52. DWR on its progress in meeting its urban water use targets, m to be developed by the DWR, when the form becomes 10-8 Table 1 Climate January February March April May June July August September October November December Annual Average Rainfall (in.) 2.6 2.7 2.2 0.6 0.4 0 0 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.9 0.3 11.7 Average Temperature (°F) 52.3 54.4 56.2 61.4 67 73.9 79.8 80.3 75.5 67.2 57.6 52.5 64.8 Evapotranspiration (ETo) 1.9 2.2 3.4 4.8 5.6 6.3 6.5 6.2 4.8 3.7 2.4 1.9 49.7 Source: Data from www.city-data.com under City of San Jacinto Z:\Jobs\1935\09\2010 UWMP\tables\Tables Table 2 City of San Jacinto Historical Annual Production (acre-feet) Calendar Year Water Supply (AF) Customers (meters) Water Use per Customer (AF/meter) Local Groundwater Wells Purchased Water from EMWD Total Grand Old Bath New Bath Mistletoe Artesia Lake Park Subtotal 1982 1/ 1/ -- 1/ - -- 1,908 0 1,908 2,519 0.76 1983 1/ 1/ -- 1/ - -- 1,991 0 1,991 2,561 0.78 1984 1/ 1/ -- 1/ - -- 2,345 0 2,345 2,602 0.90 1985 1/ 1/ -- 1/ - -- 2,442 0 2,442 2,633 0.93 1986 1/ 1/ -- 1/ - -- 2,572 0 2,572 2,687 0.96 1987 1/ 1/ -- 1/ - -- 2,573 0 2,573 2,715 0.95 1988 1/ 1/ -- 1/ - -- 2,394 0 2,394 2,802 0.85 1989 1/ 2/ 1/ 1/ - -- 2,497 0 2,497 2,917 0.86 1990 1/ -- 1/ 1/ - 2,430 0 2,430 3,165 0.77 1991 1/ -- 1/ 1/ - -- 1,953 0 1,953 3,325 0.59 1992 1/ -- 1/ 1/ - -- NA 0 NA 3,406 NA 1993 1,274 -- 1,460 20 - -- 2,753 0 2,753 3,418 3/ 0.81 3/ 1994 1,018 -- 1,600 216 - -- 2,834 0 2,834 3,430 3/ 0.83 3/ 1995 1,357 -- 1,221 12 - -- 2,590 54 2,644 3,441 3/ 0.77 3/ 1996 1,163 -- 1,774 46 - -- 2,982 47 3,029 3,453 3/ 0.88 3/ 1997 987 -- 1,282 2/ - -- 2,269 600 2,869 3,465 3/ 0.83 3/ 1998 1,080 - 1,734 - - -- 2,814 120 2,934 3,477 3/ 0.84 3/ 1999 550 - 1,357 -- 819 -- 2,725 0 2,725 3,488 3/ 0.78 3/ 2000 465 - 934 -- 1,381 -- 2,780 0 2,780 3,500 3/ 0.79 3/ 2001 495 -- 941 -- 1,306 -- 2,742 0 2,742 3,510 3/ 0.78 3/ 2002 866 -- 996 -- 1,369 -- 3,231 34 3,265 3,520 3/ 0.93 3/ 2003 895 -- 963 -- 1,296 -- 3,154 2 3,157 3,529 3/ 0.89 2004 510 -- 712 -- 1,572 -- 2,794 175 2,968 3,539 3/ 0.84 3/ 2005 370 - 939 -- 1,773 -- 3,082 0 3,082 4,228 0.73 2006 652 - 1,002 -- 2,152 -- 3,806 52 3,858 4,634 0.83 2007 687 - 705 -- 1,540 749 3,681 0 3,681 4,030 0.91 2008 508 -- 483 -- 705 1,310 3,006 23 3,029 3,998 0.76 2009 505 - 679 -- 401 1,283 2,868 0 2,868 3,956 0.72 Average 0.82 1/ Not quantified seperately 2/ Ceased Operation 3/ Estimated NA Information Not Available 2:\Jobs\1935\09\2010 UWMP\tables\Tables 5/17/2011 Table 3 City of San Jacinto Projected Water Supply and Demand (acre-feet) Year Demand 1/ Supply Estimated Water Use Based on Projected Demands (GPCD) v Urban Water Use Target (GPCD) a, Ag Domestic Total Ground Water 21 EMWD Total 2010 0 2,900 2,900 2,900 0 2,900 170 -- 2015 0 3,469 3,469 3,469 0 3,469 166 196 2020 0 4,271 4,271 4,271 0 4,271 166 174 2025 0 4,271 4,271 4,271 0 4,271 166 174 2030 0 4,271 4,271 4,271 0 4,271 166 174 1/ Data from City staff. City staff estimates buildout at 4,271 acre-feet by 2020. 2/ Includes Soboba Settlement and information from Groundwater Management Plan 3/ Based on projected demands from City staff and projected population from Chapter 2 4/ Estimated Water Use based on projected demands is lower than Urban Water Use Targets. Therefore, the City will be able to meet the States requirements. Z:\Jobs\1935\09\2010 UWMP\tables\Tables Table 4 City of San Jacinto Supply Reliability (acre-feet) Average/ Normal Water Year (2003) Single Dry Water Year (2004) Multiple Dry Water Years Year 1 (2006) Year 2 (2007) Year 3 (2008) Year 4 (2009) Anticipated Demand 1/ 3,157 2,968 3,858 3,681 3,029 2,868 122 Percent of Normal Year Demand -- 94 117 96 91 3,806 Anticipated Supply 1/ San Jacinto Basin 3,154 2,794 3,681 3,006 23 2,868 EMWD 2 175 52 0 0 Total 3,157 2,968 3,858 3,681 3,029 2,868 91 Percent of Normal Year Supply — 94 122 117 96 1/ See Table 2 Z:1Jobs11935/0912010 UWMP\tables\Tables Table 5 City of San Jacinto Past, Current and Projected Water Sales Water Use Sectors Calendar Year 2005 metered unmetered # of accounts Deliveries AFY # of accounts Deliveries AFY Single family NA NA NA NA Multi family NA NA NA NA Commercial/Institutional NA NA NA NA Industrial NA NA NA NA Landscape Irrigation NA NA NA NA Other NA NA NA NA Low Income Housing NA NA NA NA Total NA NA NA NA Water Use Sectors Calendar Year 2009 metered unmetered # of accounts Deliveries AFY # of accounts Deliveries AFY Single family 2,780 1,061 0 0 Multi family 310 721 0 0 Commercial/Institutional 758 447 0 0 Industrial 4 3 0 0 Landscape Irrigation 190 459 0 0 Other 7 126 0 0 Low Income Housing NA NA NA NA Total 4,049 2,817 0 0 Water Use Sectors Calendar Year 2015 metered unmetered # of accounts Deliveries AFY # of accounts Deliveries AFY Single family 3,500 1,544 0 0 Multi family 410 821 0 0 Commercial/Institutional 760 447 0 0 Industrial 4 3 0 0 Landscape Irrigation 190 459 0 0 Other 7 126 0 0 Low Income Housing NA NA NA NA Total 4,871 3,400 0 0 Table 5 City of San Jacinto Past, Current and Projected Water Sales (continued) Water Use Sectors Calendar Year 2020 metered unmetered # of accounts Deliveries AFY # of accounts Deliveries AFY Single family 4,398 2,244 0 0 Multi family 639 921 0 0 Commercial/Institutional 762 447 0 0 Industrial 4 3 0 0 Landscape Irrigation 190 459 0 0 Other 7 126 0 0 Low Income Housing NA NA NA NA Total 6,000 4,200 0 0 Water Use Sectors Calendar Year 2025 metered unmetered # of accounts Deliveries AFY # of accounts Deliveries AFY Single family 4,398 2,244 0 0 Multi family 639 921 0 0 Commercial/Institutional 762 447 0 0 Industrial 4 3 0 0 Landscape Irrigation 190 459 0 0 Other 7 126 0 0 Low Income Housing NA NA NA NA Total 6,000 4,200 0 0 Water Use Sectors Calendar Year 2030 metered unmetered # of accounts Deliveries AFY # of accounts Deliveries AFY Single family 4,398 2,244 0 0 Multi family 639 921 0 0 Commercial/Institutional 762 447 0 0 Industrial 4 3 0 0 Landscape Irrigation 190 459 0 0 Other 7 126 0 0 Low Income Housing NA NA NA NA Total 6,000 4,200 0 0 Table 6 Water Rationing Stages and Reduction Goals Shortage Condition Stage Customer Reduction Goal Type of Rationing Program Up to 15% I 10% Voluntary 15 - 25% II 20% Voluntary 25 - 35% III 30% Mandatory 35 - 50% IV 50% or greater Mandatory ZAJobs\1935\0912010 UWMP\tables\Tables Table 7 City of San Jacinto Baseline Daily Per Capita Water Use Water Use Service Area Population Per Capita Water Use Calendar Year Recorded Supply (acre- 1i feet) Calculated Gross Water Use (gallons per day) Calendar Year Estimated Service Area Population 21 Calculated Daily Per Capita Water Use Average Per Capita Water Use 10-Year Continuous 31 5-Year Continuous as 1996 1997 1998 3,029 2,704,076 1996 10,920 248 2,869 2,560,800 1997 11,240 228 2,934 2,618,940 1998 11,560 11,880 227 205 203 — — - ----- --- 1972002 1999 2000 2001 2,725 2,432,863 1999 2,780 2,742 5 2,481,274 2000 12,200 2,447,514 2001 12,400 2,914,627 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 12,600 12 800 13,000 13,200 13,600 231 220 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 16 57 32,817,862 2,968 3,082 3,858 2 817,862 2,649,890 2,750,937 3,443,814 204 208 253 235 217 218 218 3,681 3,286,163 2007 _ 14,000 2008 3,029 2,703,626 2,560,032 2008 2009 14,400 14,800 188 214 218 2009 2,868 173 211 211 10-Year Baseline Daily Per Capita Water Use = 5-Year Baseline Daily Per Capita Water Use = 218 218 1/ See Table 2. Includes EMWD purchases 2/ See Chapter 2 on population. 3/ Average per capita water use for first base period of 10-year continuous, ending no earlier than December 31, 2004 and no later than December 31, 2010. 4/ Average per capita water use for second base period of 5-year continuous, ending no earlier than December 31, 2007 and no later than December 31, 2010. 5/ Highest value calculated for a 10-year continuous period between 1995-96 and 2008-09. 6/ Highest value calculated for a 5-year continuous period between 2003-04 and 2008-09. Z:\Jobs\1935\09\2010 UWMP\tables\Tables Table 8 Projected Normal Water Year Supply and Demand Comparison (acre-feet) 2015 2020 2025 2030 Projected Normal Water Year Supply Total Supply" 3,469 I 4,271 Percent of Base Year for Normal Year (2003) 2/ 110 Projected. Normal Water Year Demand Demand 1/ Percent of Current Year (2009) 3/ 4,271 135 3.469 4,271 2 Projected Normal Year Supply and Demand Comparison Difference (Supply minus Demand) 0 Difference as Percent of Supply 0 Difference as Percent of Demand 0 135 4,271 135 4,271 4,271 149 149 149 0 0 1/ See Table 3 2/ Ratio of projected water supply with Base Year for Normal Water Year (2003). See Table 2 3/ Ratio of projected water demand with Current Year (2009). See Table 2 Z:\Jobs\1935\09\2010 UWMP\tables\Tables Table 9 Projected Single -Dry Year Supply and Demand Comparison (acre-feet) 2015 2020 2025 2030 Projected Single -Dry Year Supply Total Supply" Percent of Projected Normal Year 21 Projected Normal Water Year Demand Demand 1/ Percent of Projected Normal Year 3/ ,262 94 ,262 4,016 94 4,016 4,016 4,016 94 94 94 94 Projected Normal Year Supply and Demand Comparison Difference (Supply minus Demand) 0 Difference as Percent of Supply 0 Difference as Percent of Demand 0 1/ See Table 3 2/ Ratio of projected Single -Dry water supply with projected Normal Year supply. See Table 8 3/ Ratio of projected Single -Dry water demand with projected Normal Year demand See Table 8 Z:\Jobs\1935\09\2010 UWMP\tables\Tables Table 10 Projected Multiple Dry Years Supply and Demand Comparison (acre-feet) Period Beginning 2015 I Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 I Year 4 Year 5 Projected Multiple -Dry Year Water Supply Supply" Percent of Projected Normal Year 21 Projected Multiple -Dry Year Water Demand Demand 11 4,240 122 4,240 4,046 117 3,328 96 4,046 Percent of Projected Normal Year 21 122 117 Projected Multiple -Dry Year Water Supply and Demand Comparison Difference (Supply minus Demand) 0 0 Difference as Percent of Supply 0 Difference as Percent of Demand 0 3,152 91 3,152 91 3,328 I 3,152 3,152 96 I 91 91 0 0 Period Beginning 2020 Year 1 I Year2 Year 3 I Year 4 Year 5 Projected Multiple -Dry Year Water Supply Supply 1/ Percent of Projected Normal Year 21 4,271 100 4,271 100 Projected Multiple -Dry Year Water Demand Demand 1/ 4,271 Percent of Projected Normal Year21 100 4,271 100 4,098 3,880 3,880 96 91 91 4,098 3,880 96 Projected Multiple -Dry Year Water Supply and Demand Comparison Difference (Supply minus Demand) 0 0 Difference as Percent of Supply 0 0 Difference as Percent of Demand 0 0 91 3,880 91 0 Z:\Jobs1193510912010 UWMP\tables\Tables Table 10 Projected Multiple Dry Years Supply and Demand Comparison (acre-feet) (continued) Period Beginning 2025 I Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Projected Multiple -Dry Year Water Supply Supply/ Percent of Projected Normal Year 21 4,271 100 Projected Multiple -Dry Year Water Demand Demand 1' 4,271 4,271 100 4,271 4,098 96 4, 098 3,880 91 3,880 91 Percent of Projected Normal Year 21 100 100 Projected Multiple -Dry Year Water Supply and Demand Comparison Difference (Supply minus Demand) 0 0 Difference as Percent of Supply 0 0 Difference as Percent of Demand 0 0 96 0 3,880 I 3,880 91 I 91 Period Beginning 2030 I Year 1 Year 2 I Year 3 I Year 4 I Year 5 Projected Multiple -Dry Year Water Supply 4,271 4,271 I 4,098 3,880 3,880 Supply 1/ Percent of Projected Normal Year 2' 100 100 H. 96 91 91 Projected Multiple -Dry Year Water Demand Demand t1 4,271 4,271 100 4,098 96 3,880 3,880 Percent of Projected Normal Year 2' 100 91 91 Projected Multiple -Dry Year Water Supply and Demand Comparison Difference (Supply minus Demand) 0 0 0 0 0 Difference as Percent of Supply 0 0 0 0 0 Difference as Percent of Demand 0 0 0 0 0 1/ Based on ratio between Normal Water Year with Multiple Dry Years. See Tables 4 and 8. However, if calculation is greater than the City's estimated buildout of 4,271 AF, then supply/demand will cap at 4,271 AF. 2/ Ratio of projected multiple dry years with projected normal water year. See Table 8 Z:\Jobs\1935\09\2010 UWMP\tables\Tables 30 25 - 20 - 15 - c 10 - 60-year Av oe e re (150-1' re re e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6\ 0 0 Calendar Year Source: Climatological Data Annual Summary, VOL. 54 through103 for calendar years 1950 - 1999 and County of Riverside Flood Control for Calendar Years 2000 - 2005 *Station moved from San Jacinto to San Jacinto Ranger Station beginning in 1978 STETS4DINI ENGINEERS INC. STETSON ENGINEERS INC. Covina San Rafael Mesa, Arizona WATER RESOURCE ENGINEERS CITY OF SAN JACINTO ANNUAL RAINFALL Z:\Jobs11Jo‘0912010 UWMP1figureskFigurel PLATE 1 r24 S A GRAND WELL: 440 NEWT AND EVANS E WD ,/ LEGEND 0 WELL A RESERVOIR M EMWD CONNECTION MI VNDADE OAKS DRIVE...NM IRO COVEM, CALJNORTNA 91724 TE.L. DEM DEDEMED FA. (62.391400$ alit STETSON IWO CITY OF SAN JACINTO WATER SERVICE AREA WELLS AND EMWD CONNECTIONS FAJOBS,1935t09l2PID UWMPVIetesIPLATE 1.0WG F:LIOSSM35-09.CTB STETSON ENGINEERS INC. 861 VILLAGE OAKS DRIVE, STE 100 COVINA, CALIFORNIA 91724 TEL: (626) 967-6202 FAX (626) 331-7085 2171 E Francisco Blvd., Suite K San Rafael California 94901 2651 W Guadalupe Rd., Suite A209 Mesa Arizona 85202 10,000' 10,000' CITY OF SAN JACINTO VICINITY MAP SAN JACINTO GROUNDWATER BASIN F:\JOBS\1935\00, 010 F:WOBS\193F ( t1WMP\Piates\PLATE 2.DWG