HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 12/17/1991AGENDA
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
DATE: December 17, 1991
TIME: 7:30 P.M.
PLACE: COMMUNITY CENTER
625 South Pico
San Jacinto, California
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
Roll Call
Moment of Silence for Reflection
Pledge of Allegiance
2.0 COUNCIL REORGANIZATION
2.1 Selection of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem
3.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
4.0 CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be
routine and will be enacted by one motion by the City Council in
the form listed.
There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the
motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public
requests specified items to be removed and/or discussed.
Anyone wishing to discuss onsent Calendar item should come
forward, upon invitation of tae Mayor, state their name, address
and the Consent Calendar item number. Speakers should limit
comments to three minutes.
4.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting of December 3, 1991
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of December 3, 1991, as presented.
4.2 Wars_ ant Register
RECOMMENDATION: Approve Warrant Nos. 26973 through 27118
dated December 15, 1991, in the amount of $209,585.01 as
submitted by the Finance Director.
Receive and file the Treasurer's Report
4.3 Treasurer's Report
RECOMMENDATION. for the month of November, 1991.
Amend A•*ro•riations Limitation Fiscal Year amendin-9
g the
4.4 RECOMMENDATION• Adopt Resolution No. ear 1990 1991.
R.
appropriations limitation for fiscal y
RESOLUTION NO. 5V7)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL HE APPROPRIATIONS
F THE CITY OF
A CALIFORNIA, AMENDINGAMENDING
SAN JACINTO, 1990-1991 AND
LIMITATION FOR FISCAL YEAR
RESOLUTION NO. 1889 ACCORDINGLY
Amend Bud et - Fiscal Year 1991-92
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No.
budget for fiscal year 1991-1992.
26(
RESOLUTION NO.
E CITY OF
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY p�E�NUING THE OF HBUDGET FOR
SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, 1991-1992
FISCAL YEAR
4.6 1990-91 Annual Audit Re
ee and file.
ort
RECOMMENDATION..
4.7 AlarmRECOMMENDATION: Ordinance
Second Readin of Ordinance No.
Waive the full reading C3rdinance No. 944
RECOMMENDATION: title only and adopt
944 andiread by Municipal Code relating to Alarm Systems.
amending
ORDINANCE NO. 944
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
REPEALING CHAPTER 8.20 OF TITLE 8 OF SAN
CODE RELATING TO ALARM
JACINTO MUNICIPAL
SYSTEMS AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 8.20
tercable Jo- Resolution Amendin Securest Interest
4,8 RECOMMENDATION:
MMI NDAnAdopt Resolution
mending the
t
it interest
erest clause for Jones Intercable franchise.
secur Y
RESOLUTION NO. '466'
A RESOLUTION OF THE pLIFORNIIIANC L OF THE
AUTHORIZING
CITY OF SAN JACINTO, DIEGO, INC., TO MORTGAGE
PLEDGEJONES I OR GRANT,BLE OF SAN THE CABLE
OR A SECURITY INTEREST IN
THE NON-
EXCLUSIVE ISION SYSTEMTELEVIS OR ANY PART THEREOF
amending the
2
Rancho San Jacinto Irrigation Well
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Manager to negotiate
an agreement with Peacock Radaker for the purchase of the
Rancho San Jacinto Irrigation Well and a 1.3 acre site at
a cost not to exceed $40,000, with funding from the CFD
#2.
Transportation Master Plan and Circulation Element
Contract
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the selection of Robert Kahn,
John Kain & Associates, Inc., to prepare a Transportation
Master Plan and Circulation Element for a fee of $20,000
for Tasks 1 through 3 with $13,000 of the funding from
fund 21, Accounts 2400 and 2710, and authorize the Mayor
to execute an appropriate contract.
4.11 Declaration of Scrap Property
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. declaring
certain property scrap and authorizing disposal in the
least costly manner.
RESOLUTION NO. 2/1;,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO DECLARING CERTAIN
PROPERTY SCRAP AND AUTHORIZING DISPOSAL OF
OF SAID PROPERTY IN THE LEAST COSTLY MANNER
4.12 Bond Release - Tract 22677 (Ann Arbor Homes, Inc.)
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the release of maintenance
bonds in the amount of $10,000.
State Street Water Line Reimbursement (Basic Shelter,
Inc.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the reimbursement to Basic
Shelter, Inc., for improvements to the water line on
State Street in the amount of $17,869.10.
4.14 Improvement Agreement 730 Ramona Expressway (Arrowhead
Pacific)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the improvement deferral
agreement and authorize the recording of same.
4.15 Improvement Agreement 1543 N. Ramona Boulevard (Mac
Farland)
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the improvement deferral
agreement, accept the irrevocable offer to dedicate and
authorize the recording of same.
3
4.16 Notice of Completion - B & Sons Construction
RECOMMENDATION: Accept the downtown water lines as
constructed by B & Sons Construction and authorize the
City Clerk to record a Notice of Completion.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by: Seconded by: to
approve consent calendar items 4.1 through 4.16 and adopt
Resolutions No. thru , and adopt Ordinance No.944
Vote:
5.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
6.0 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS
7.1 Landfill Dump Fee and AB 939
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. adjusting the
rates for collection of Garbage and Rubbish within the
City, increasing the landfill dump fee and recover the
costs of AB 939 compliance.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AND ADJUSTING RATES FOR
THE COLLECTION OF GARBAGE AND RUBBISH COLLECTED
WITHIN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
7.2 City Hall for the 90's Proposal
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to negotiate with Peacock
Radaker, and if not successful negotiate with Rancon, for
the constructions of the city hall facility.
8.0 MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
9.0 CLOSED SESSION
10.0 ADJOURNMENT
Motion by:
adjourn.
Vote:
Seconded by: Action: to
I, Maurice Armster, do hereby certify that I caused to be posted
the foregoing agenda this 13th day of December, 1991, as required
by law.
4
Maurce Armster, City Clerk
l
�y %'
DATE:
STAFF REPORT
December 17 , 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Interim Deputy City Clerk
SUBJECT: Minutes of Regular Meeting December 3, 1991
RECOMMENDATION:
submitted.
117
Approve the minutes of December 3, 1991, as
MINUTES
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
December 3, 1991
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
The Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called
to order by Mayor Boykin at 7:30 P.M. in the Community Center,
625 South Pico, San Jacinto, California.
Present: Councilmembers Ford, Hafliger, Leahy, Richards
and Mayor Boykin
Absent: None
A Moment of Silence was observed for Reflection
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Boykin
2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None
3.0 CONSENT CALENDAR
Council consensus to pull consent item 3.6 for separate
action.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by
Councilmember Hafliger to approve the consent calendar as
presented with the exception of item 3.6. Motion carried on
a 5-0 vote.
3.1 Minutes of Special Meeting of November 19, 1991
Approved the Minutes of the Special Meeting of November
19, 1991, as presented.
3.2 Minutes of Regular Meeting of November 19, 1991
Approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November
19, 1991, as presented.
3.3 Warrant Register
Approved Warrant Nos. 26852 through 26972 dated November
30, 1991, in the amount of $231,274.16 as submitted by
the Finance Director.
December 3, 1991
3.4 Annexation #74
Uninhabited territory located at the southwest corner of
State Street and Esplanade.
Adopted Resolution No. 2008 approving the initiation of
proceedings for Annexation #74.
RESOLUTION NO. 2008
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO, DECLARING ITS INTENTION
TO INITIATE ON ITS O" MOTION PROCEEDINGS TO
EX CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY KNOWN AS
ANNEXATION NO. 74
Community Development Director McNabb explained the
boundaries (which would include the industrial property
between Esplanade and Commonwealth) and the process of
proceedings in this matter. In addition, in response to
Council inquiries, advised that of the 26 properties
involved, 20% of the owners polled were neutral, 5% were
negative, 13.3% were in favor and the remaining did not
respond.
Bill Ballinger, Ballinger Development, owner of Esplanade
Industrial Park for 19 years, spoke in opposition to this
matter. Stated he felt in an economic downturn more
government is not needed. Further, did not wish to
secure the services of the city, very content with County
service and the lesser restrictions they impose. Being
a part of unincorporated territory had been beneficial to
their business and this action would have a detrimental
fiscal impact.
Billie Heboian-Schierer, 24450 Kirby Street, supported
the principals stated by Mr. Ballinger. Although opposed
to being a part of any city, would prefer to be annexed
to Hemet because of their location.
3.5 Annexation #59
Uninhabited territory located southerly and westerly of
Soboba Road, easterly of Alessandro Avenue and northerly
of Main Street.
Adopted Resolution No. 2009 setting the matter for
approval at a public hearing on January 7, 1992.
2
December 3, 1991
RESOLUTION NO. 2009
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR
THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY TO THE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO KNOWN AS ANNEXATION NO. 59 AND
GIVING NOTICE OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION
Community Development Director McNabb clarified for
Council that a majority of property owners were in favor
of the annexation, and identified the specific location
and affected streets. Further, advised that the action
would create a pennisula which LAFCO has required the
City to attempt to annex prior to the completion of
Annexation #59.
3.7 Southern California Edison Easement
Authorized the granting of an easement to Southern
California Edison Company for electrical facilities
servicing the Grand Avenue Well and authorized the Mayor
to execute the easement on behalf of the City.
3.8 Alarm Ordinance (First Reading) and Fee Resolution
Waived the full reading of Ordinance No. 944 and read by
title only and introduced Ordinance No. 944 amending the
Municipal Code relating to Alarm Systems and adopted
Resolution No. 2010 establishing fees for Alarm Systems.
ORDINANCE NO. 944
ORDIN CE OF THE CITY OF S JACINTO,
REPEALING CHAPTER 8.20 OF TITLE 8 OF SAN
JACINTO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ALARM
SYSTEMS AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 8.20
RESOLUTION NO. 2010
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO REPEALING RESOLUTION NO.
1960 AND ESTABLISHING FEES FOR ALARM SYSTEMS
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 8.30 OF THE SAN JACINTO
MUNICIPAL CODE
3.9 Acceptance of Donated Property
Adopted Resolution No. 2011 accepting donation of scanner
from Dave Anderson for use by the Police Department.
December 3, 1991
RESOLUTION NO. 2011
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO ACCEPTING DONATED PROPERTY
FOR USE WITHIN THE SAN JACINTO POLICE DEPARTMENT
3.10 CFD #2 Foreclosure Order - Special Counsel Agreement
Adopted Resolution No. 2012 ordering foreclosure actions
and approving Special Counsel Agreement with Robert A.
Owen at a cost not to exceed $150.00 per parcel and
$150.00 per hour.
RESOLUTION NO. 2012
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2
ORDERING FORECLOSURE ACTIONS AND APPROVING
SPECIAL COUNSEL AGREEMENT
Staff clarified for Council that the property owners
affected were not occupied residential owners, but rather
were large parcels of undeveloped land.
City Attorney Cox in response to Council inquiries,
advised that interest and penalties would be accrued and
all the normal provisions for redemption would be offered
to the property owners.
Finance Director Vega advised that two notices were sent
by registered mail to the property owners, one has
indicated he will pay by the end of the month and the
other two have not responded.
Consent Item Removed for Separate Action:
3.6 Removal of Water Tanks at Mistletoe Park
Councilmember Leahy indicated concern that with the
present economic constraints this may not be fiscally
responsible.
City Manager Easter advised that funding was included in
the 91-92 budget for the Water Department. The tanks had
been out of service since 1988, and because of their
condition the City would not be able to use them in the
future. Removal was part of the capital improvement
program.
Mayor Boykin clarified that funding would not be from the
General Fund.
4
December 3, 1991
Staff clarified that the purpose for removal was not
merely aesthetics, but also to minimize liability.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Ford, seconded by
Councilmember Hafliger, to award the contract for removal
of the water tanks at Mistletoe Park to Superior Tank in
the amount of $19,500 and authorize the Mayor to execute
an appropriate contract on behalf of the City, and
authorize the transfer of $1,500 from the Water Fund
Reserve to fund the project. Motion carried on a 4-1
vote with Councilmember Leahy dissenting.
4.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
5.0 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None
6.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS
6.1 Fire Truck Participation in Holiday Parade
Fire Chief Chadwick advised they were prepared to
participate in the parade at 2 PM the following Saturday,
with a decorating party at 1 PM on Friday.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Ford, seconded by
Councilmember Leahy to consider an urgency item which came up
after the agenda was posted, for the preservation of the
health and welfare of the residents of the City. Motion
carried on a 5-0 vote.
6.2 Urgency Ordinance - Taxicabs
City Attorney Cox advised that the matter came up after
the agenda was posted. Explained the mandate by the PUC
to regulate taxis. Staff had been looking at a possible
joint powers authority, similar to one in the desert,
however it would not be practical in this area. If
immediate action were not taken on the matter, taxis
would not be able to operate in the City, which would be
critical to the transportation needs of elderly
residents. The Municipal Code established regulations in
1987 for granting a franchise, however no applications
were made nor was it enforced. In the meantime two
companies had been operating outside the law. This
proposed action would be easier and would have less
liability, much the same as the action taken by Hemet the
5
December 3, 1991
previous week. With regard to fines for operating
outside the law, the police could cite those not in
compliance and go through the court process. The action
would apply only to metered service. Those not metered
could register and be regulated by the PUC (which would
take 4-8 weeks), but must do one or the other. The
proposed action was an interim measure and could be
reviewed over the next 60 days. Regarding insurance
limits, they were the same as Hemet's and the minimum
required by PUC.
Billie Heboian-Schierer, 24450 Kirby Street, encouraged
the City to consider both cab companies because of the
many residents dependent upon them for transportation.
Anthony DeMonte, 2627 W. Florida, Owner of Valley Cab,
submitted a copy of code sections to the Council
regarding insurance. Advised he would operate under
county license for 6 weeks. This would necessitate
providing two different types of vehicles (metered and
unmetered) to service the area. Voiced some concerns
with regard to the timing of the Council action.
Indicated dissatisfaction with the other cab company
violating the law when they were in compliance and the
negative effect on his business. Further, that citations
were not issued.
Mayor Boykin clarified that staff was working on this
issue in a timely a manner. With regard to citations,
suggested Mr. DeMonte discuss the matter with the Chief
of Police.
Robert Washburn, 25115 Kirby Street, Valley Cab employee,
advised that they served many elderly and yet had to
cease operations and service to them in order to comply
with the law, while the other cab company was in
violation. Felt it was not fair to allow them to get
away with it, and the city was losing revenue.
City Attorney Cox clarified that both companies had been
in violation for some time since neither had applied for
a franchise from the City, nor applied to PUC. Suddenly
PUC began to crack down which forced the issue to come to
the attention of the City.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Ford, seconded by
Councilmember Hafliger to waive the full reading of
Urgency Ordinance No. 945 and read by title only and to
adopt Urgency Ordinance No. 945 regulating Taxicab
Transportation Service. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote.
6
December 3, 1991
ORDINANCE NO. 945
AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, REGULATING TAXICAB TRANSPORTATION SERVICE
AND DECLARING THE FACTS CONSTITUTING THE URGENCY
7.0 MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
7.1 Senior Softball Tournament
Councilmember Hafliger advised there was nothing further
to report at the time.
Councilmember Leahy advised that services for Mr. Johnson
would be held at 2 PM on Friday at the Riverside National
Cemetery.
8.0 CLOSED SESSION
None
9.0 ADJOURNMENT
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by
Councilmember Ford to adjourn. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote.
The hour of adjournment being 8:40 P.M.
Submitted by
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
Approved by
Francis R. Boykin, Mayor
7
1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Register of Demands
DATE: December 17, 1991
RECOCATION
Approve warrant numbers 26973 through 27118 dated December 15, 1991
in the amount of $ 209,585.01.
•
A listing of the warrants is attached for your review and approval.
GLCD12
CITY GF SAN .ACINTO
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS PAGE 1
CHECK
26973*
26974*
26975*
26976*
26977*
26978*
26979*
26980*
2b981*
26982*
26983*
26984*
26985*
26986*
26987*
26988*
26989*
26990*
26991*
26992*
26993*
26994*
26995*
26996*
26997*
26998*
26999*
270OO*
27O01*
270O2*
27003*
27O04»
270O5*
27O06*
27O07*
27OO8*
27O09*
2701O*
27O12*
27013
27014
27015
27016
27017
27018
27019
27020
27021
27022
27023
27024
UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK A/C 201398 DATE 12/15/91
ISSUED TO
PUBLIC EMP. RET, SYSTEM
PUBLIC EMP, ASSOC~
LEAGUE OF CALIF, CITIES
SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON
SO. CA^ GAS
CULBERTSON/S WINERY
SO CA GAS
SOUTHERN CALIF^ EDISON
AVP VISION PLAN
STANDARD INS. COMPANY
HEALTH NET
BLUE CROSS OF SO. CA.
SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON
SO. CA^ GAS
SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON
STANDARD INS. COMPANY
SOUTHERN CALIF, EDISON
SO, CA. GAS
SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON
SO. CA. GAS
PAMELA LEE
EASTERN MUNI^WATER DIST
CITRUS BELT CHAPTER
SOUTHERN CALIF, EDISON
SU, CA* GAS
SO CA^ GAS
SOUTHERN CALIF, EDISON
U^S. POSTMASTER
U.S. POSTMASTER
3 DAY BLINDS, INC.
RIVERSIDE CO. EMP^
lCMA RETIREMENT TRUST
SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON
SO^ CA~ GAS
SO~ CA^ GAS
SOUTHERN CALIF. EDISON
LANCE HARRISON
SOUTHERN CALIF, EDISON
SO. CA, GAS
CYNTHIA JEFFS
WILLIAM MACADAM
DENNIS WARNER
AT & [
AT & T LANGUAGE LINE
ALPHA BETA
APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT
LOUIS R. ARROYA^ JR^
ARROW PRINTING
B & S INDUSTRIES
B & W PIPE CO,
E.S. BABCOCK & SONS
DESCRIPTION
RETIREMENT
PERC DUES
SEMINAR-ARMSTER
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
GIFT CERT, EMPL. PROGRAM
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
PAYMENT COLLECTIDN8
VISION PLAN INSURANCE
LIFE 1 DISABILITY INSURANCE
HELTH INSURANCE
HEALTH INSURANCE
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
LIFE & DISABILITY INSURANCE-NOV.
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
DEPUTY CITY CLERK SERVICES
SEWER FEES COLLECTED
CONFERENCE-SHIPMAN
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
PG3TAGE WATER BILLS
REPLENISH POSTAGE METER
BLINDS-201 E. MAIN
CREDIT UNION DEDi/CT[ONS
DEFERRED COMP.
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
PAYMENT COLLECTTONS
PAYMENT COLLECT7ONS
PAYMENT COLLECTTONS
HOLIDAY WINDOW PAINTING
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
PART-TIME HELP/WATER
MANAGEMENT COURSE-F^D^
REIMB^ POST SCHOOL. FEES
CELLULAR PHONES
LANGUAGE LINE-PD.
DOG FOOD-F.D. & SUPPLIES
TEMPORARY SERVICE -WATER
JANITORIAL SERVICE
BUSINESS CARDS -ALL DFPTS.
BARRICADE TAPE-F^D.
PARTS -PUBLIC WORKS
LAB TEGTS-WATER
AMOUNT
19,123.74
151^28
3O^O0
926.97
332^43
50^0O
20O.O7
368.25
976^40
2,967^70
18,85O^05
3,431~OO
340^21
1O7^57
839.69
3,O30^32
787^56
439,50
444^39
206^19
1,312^50
62,137,44
30^0O
274^27
176.20
73^85
133~26
839^31
910^O0
391.13
1^937^5O
1^21O.O0
215^97
208.12
492^60
531^39
9O^OO
128^4O
431^60
448.00
63.07
24^4k�
25^44
25,00
76^92
841^16
1,900^00
690,94
299-25
202.87
67^00
x�.ITf OF SAN JACINTO
GLCD12 REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS PA61,_
CHECK
m7O25
27026
27027
27028
27029
27030
27031
27032
27033
27034
27035
27036
27037
27038
27039
27040
27041
27042
27043
27044
27045
27046
27047
27048
27049
27050
27051
27052
27O53
27054
27055
27056
27057
27058
27059
27060
27061
27062
27063
27064
27065
27066
27067
27068
27069
27070
27071
27072
27073
27074
27075
UNl7Lu CALIKuHNIA BANK
ISSUED TO
BEAUMONT CONCRETE CO.
BIO SAFETY
BOB'S LUMBER
BONNEVILLE TRAVEL GROUP
BUILDERS EMPORIUM
CALIFORNIA FIRE SERVICE
CASTELLANO'S TOWING
ROSS CHADWICK
SALVADOR CERVAHTES
CODE THREE PRINTING
VERONICA S. SASSER
ALLYSON LEWIS
JACKIE URIAS
ALLIED TRADE CO.
JOSEPHINA SOTELO
BILL OWEN
ILDEFONSO HEKNANDEZ
SAN JACINTO INVESTORS
lRACY GATZ
JACKIE OLIVER
COM SER CO.
COMTRONIX OF HEMET
C.E.D.
COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL
COX & COX
L.N. CURTISS
DE BROS BLUEPRINTING
DESERT FIRE 2XTING^
DICTAPHONE CORPORATION
DISTRICT SERVICE CENTER
DIXIE USA. INC.
PAHELA EASTER
EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST
EVANS TIRE CU^
FEDERAL EXPRESS CU^
OFELIA FIERRU
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
GOLDEN RULE CREATIONS
SARA GUSSECK & ASSC,
HEMET ELEC, MOTOR
HEMET FENCE CO.
HEMET NEWS
HEMET PET CENTER
HEMET RUBBER STAMP
HEMET VALLEY TOOL
HILLTOP SOFTWARE
HOUSE OF QUALITY
HUBBS STATIONERY
I^B,M. CORP.
INTERNATIONAL COHF.
A/C 201398 DATE 12/15/91
DESCRIPTION
CONCRETE -CITY YARD
GLOVES-F^D~
SUPPLIEG-PUBLIC WORKS
AIR FAR[-ARMSTER/MONTEREY
FENCE MATERIALS-F^D,
PROGRAM CERT^-REYNOSO
TOWING CHARGES-P.D^
ICMA BOOKS-F°D~
LIAB. CLAIM SETTLFMENT
SHIFT CALENDARS-F^D^
REIHB. WATER DEPOSTT
REIMB^ WATER DEPOSIT
REIMB, WATER DEPOSIT
REIMB^ WATER DEPOSIT
REIMB, WATER DEPOSIT
REIMB^ WATER DEPOSIT
REIMB^ WATER DEPOSIT
REIMB, WATER DEPOSIT
REIMB; WATER DEPOSIT'
REIMB^ WATER DEPOSIT
RADIO MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS
REPAIR RADIOS
P^W. ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE
TESTING-P^D~ & P^W^
LEGAL SERVICES
PARTS FIRE TRUCK
MyLARS
EXTINGUISHER SUPPLIES-F-D.
CLEANING PADS-DICTAPHONE-P.D,
DRY INK-P.D.
EMERGENCY SUPPLIFS-F^D.
REIMB^-MEETING
UTILITIES
TIRES & REPAIRS
MAILING -CIVIC
REIMB^ MILEAGE -OUTREACH
BANK CARD STMT.,
PHONE SERVICES
PATCH SAMPLE-F~D,
LEGAL SERVICES-WILSON/CLAIM
NEW HANDLE ON DRI|'L- P-W.
FENCING-HOFFMAN PARK
LEGAL ADVERTISING
SUPPLIFS-F.D^
REPAIR STAMP -WATER DFPT,
SUPPLIES-BLDG. DEPT^
PROGRAMMING SERVICES
AUTO PARTS
OFFICE SUPPLlES
MAINTENANCE -PRINTER
PLAN CHECK
AMOUNT
2O5~39
56^05
102.34
245.10
68.57
45^O0
3OO^0O
46^45
960^76
119.33
50.00
20^65
13^36
300^30
50^00
22^05
29.60
500~00
25^O0
50.00
907,15
333,83
682,63
919^80
39705.00
17,194^24
18.99
121.26
218^21
469.96
1,279,88
25^22
2,691,56
3,610^15
32.50
11.70
10^98
2,676,72
233.00
709^10
9^O0
9^O53~80
149.13
36^81
12,93
31^19
210.00
1,513.90
1^7O3,44
2O1^00
392^40
CITY Oft SAN JACINTO
GLCD12 REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS PAGE
CHECK
27076
27077
27078
27079
27080
27O81
27082
27083
27084
27085
27086
27087
27088
27089
27090
27091
27092
27093
27094
27095
27096
27097
27098
27099
27100
27101
27102
27103
27104
27105
27106
27107
27108
27109
27110
27111
27112
27113
27114
27115
27116
27117
27118
UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK A/C 201198 DATE 12/15/91
ISSUED TO
KING SIGN CO^
LAKESIDE CHEVROLET
LONGS DRUG STURE
MICHAEL LYNN
AMETEK/MC CROMETER DIV,
MARKMAN^ ARZYNSKI
MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE
MOURE BUSINESS FORMS
NATIONAL NOTARY ASSC^
NATIONAL NOTARY ASGC^
NEWPORTWAVE SOFTWARE
OVERNIGHT INDUSTRIAL
PACIFIC A-1 FIRE EQPT^
PACTELL CELLULAR -LA
PAGENET
LARRY PIERCE PLUMBING
PITNEY BOWES
POLAR BEAR RADIATOR SER
SAN JACIUNTO FIRE DEPT^
RUTH E. PRATER
PRESS -ENTERPRISE
QUAST TREE SERVICE
ED RABY
RACEWAY FORD
RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
SAN JACINTO MUSEUM
RUTH SCHWAB
GCOTSMAN MANUFACTURING
SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.
SHARP BUILDING SUPPLY
SMALL ANIMAL HOSPITAL
SO, CALIFORNIA EDISON
SO. CALIFORNIA GAS CO,
SPARKLETTS
STAR TERMITE AND PEST
STATE MATERIALS
STEVE'S AUTO PARTS
TAC EXTERMINATORS
WALTER^ LEMMON & HOGHN
CARL WARREN & CO.
WRITE PRICE
XEROX CORPORATION
DESCRIPTION
PARKING SIGNS -CITY HALL
VEHICLE REPAIRS
SUPPLIES-P^D^
REIMB^ MILEAGE
WATER METERS
LEGAL SERVICE-HOUSEL
UNIFORM CLEANING
4000 WARRANTS -PRINTING
SEHINAR-MORA
SEALS-MORA
COMPUTER TECH^
SUPPLIES -ALL DEPTS^
EXTINGUISHER SERVICE
CELLULAR PHONE-F.D.
RENTAL RADIO PAGERS
WATER SUPPLIES
RENTAL OF POSTAGE METER
RADIATOR REPAIRS-P.D
PETTY CASH
OVERPAYMENT -WATER
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADS
TREE TRIMMING-LLMD
REIMBURSE GAS MTLEAGE-WATER
PARTS-P^D^
ERASER REFILLS -PLANNING
HIGHWAY FLARE-P.D,
CURATOR SERVICES
PART-TIME HELP -RECEPTIONIST
MONTHLY LEASE-OFFICE/P^D^
SUPPLIEG-WATER DEPT.
BUILDING SUPPLIES
EXAM INJURED DnG
UTILITIES
UTILITIES
MONTHLY RENTAL
TERMITE CONTR0--201 E, MAIN
POUR STONE-201 E^ MAIN
VEHICLE PARTS
PEST WORK-C.C.
LEGAL SERVICES-WILSON/CLAIM
CLAIMS INSURANCE ADJUSTERS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MAINTENANCE -COPIER
AMOUNT
198^26
3,400.41
204^56
31^51
118^77
910^00
489.39
1,354^42
124.00
25^85
81^25
731,58
116,61
1,334^74
344^80
31^O5
138^19
199,05
42^33
13^64
74^80
1,575^0O
24^96
46^68
13^15
342^63
1,475^00
280^OO
881^40
285^89
1,568.31
10.30
3,832^35
302^31
148~33
890.00
18.20
824^29
43^50
2,9O1^0O
516.18
5^13
1^388^77
FINAL TOTAL 209,585^01
Prepaid Checks
FUND 10
FUND 11
FUND 14
FUND 20
FUND 21
FUND 24
FUND 25
FUND 28
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS Page A
34,141.72
60.78
456.62
6,727.04
263.64
277.73
6,669.94
8,994.00
FUND 40 9,761.98
FUND 42 30.00
FUND 50 6,556.45
FUND 65 89,633.77
FUND 66 63.25
FUND 91 113.96
FUND 96 140.52
Misc.Payroll 45,693.61
TOTAL $209,585.01
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
FROM: Ken Leahy, City Treasurer
SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report
DATE: December 17, 1991
RECOMMENDATION
Receive and File.
1 •
A listing of City and Agency investments is attached for City
Council's review and file.
DATE
INSTITUTION
SERIAL #
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
TREASURER REPORT
FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER 1991
INTEREST MATURITY PRINCIPAL
RATE DATE AMOUNT
02-20-85 STATE-L.A.I.F 6.559 Average 7,091,000
SERIAL # 9833794
01-19-88 STATE-L.A.I.F. 6.559 Average 858,000
SERIAL # 5133120
08-1989 HEMET FEDERAL 5.000 Open 1,461
CHECKING First Interstate Open 48,377
SERIAL # 3980000
TOTAL INVESTMENTS 7,998,838
I certify that these investments comply with all State
Laws pertaining to the investment of Local Agency Funds
and the City of San Jacinto's investment policies.
Ken Leahy
City Treasurer
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance Director
SUBJECT: 1990-91 Appropriations Limit Amendment
DATE: December 17, 1991
RECO il4 IATIONS
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution
amending the 1990-91 Appropriations Limit according to Article
XIIIB of the California Constitution.
BACKGROUND
On June 19, 1990 the City Council adopted resolution 1889, 1990-91
Appropriations Limit. This amount must now be amended due to a
change in the appropriations limit formula required by the passage
of proposition 111.
The procedures performed and our findings were as follows:
1. We obtained the completed worksheets presented in the Article
XIIIB Appropriations Limitation Uniform Guidelines and
calculated the limit and annual adjustment factors.
2. The accompanying Appropriations Limit (worksheet #6) was
calculated by multiplying line A (last years's limit), by line
B, for a total adjusted limit of line F ($6,486,373).
These computations will be subject to an audit, at year end by our
independent auditors. The audit will be based on the application
of the procedures in accordance with Article XIIIB of the
California Constitution.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
1991-92 FISCAL YEAR
A. 1989-90 AMENDED LIMIT 5,643,269
B. ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
1. Population % 1.1030
2. Inflation % 1.0421
Total Adjustment %
C. ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT $
D. OTHER ADJUSTMENTS:
Lost Responsibility (-)
Assumed Responsibility (+)
Sub -total 0
E. TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS 0
F. 1990-91 AMENDED LIMIT 6,486,373
1.1494 (B1 x B2)
6,486,373 (B X A)
Worksheet #6
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE APPROPRIATIONS
LIMITATION FOR FISCAL ' 1990-1991 AND AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. 1889 ACCO INGLY
WHEREAS, Article IliK of the California Constitution provides for the
establishment of a formal spending limitation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did, by Resolution No. 1: :9 on June 19, 1990, adopt
said limitations, and now must amend said resolution and limitation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED that the amended appropriations
limitation for fiscal year is established as $6,486,373, subject to later adjustments for
annexations, transfer and newly -assumed services and newly -established fees.
APPROVED AND
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
OFIED this 17th day of December, 1991 by the following
Francis R. Boykin, Mayor
The foregoing is certified to be a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. duly
adopted by the City Council and on file in this office.
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance Director
SUBJECT: 1991-92 Budget Amendment
DATE: December 17, 1991
RECO ATION
Adopt resolution amending the 1991-92 fiscal year budget.
BACKGROUND
The City Council reviewed general fund revenue and expenditure in
detail at the December 3rd study session. Council recommendations
are being forwarded for an amendment of the 1991-92 fiscal year
budget.
REVENUES
As was discussed staff made reasonable and prudent estimates of
revenue and expenditures, given the conditions at the time budget
was adopted for fiscal year 1991-92. The economy since that time
has continued to deteriorate. Development related revenues have
been less than anticipated thus requiring a budget adjustment.
Each department has voluntarily cut back expenditures to offset
this reduction and balance the budget.
Specific revenues that have been affected by the economy are
Construction Permits, down 40%, Planning Fees, down 73%, and Plan
Checking Fees, down 16%.
The budget projections are based on the current revenue forecast.
This requires a $740,000 reduction in expenditures in order to
balance the budget.
One of the priorities established by the Council was to enhance the
City's revenues. With Council direction, staff contracted for a
study to identify potential user fees for various City services.
Secondly, an audit of sales tax receipts is also been conducted.
Finally, an increase in Plan processing fees was approved by
Council commencing in August of 1991.
Page 2
1991-92 Budget Amendment
EXPENDITURES
Expenditure reductions of $740,000, as proposed by City Staff and
reviewed by City Council are being recommended for approval. One
of the recommendations affects budgeted staff positions. This
recommendation consists of freezing 6 vacant positions and delay
the hiring of 1 additional positions, until such time that
sufficient funds are available.
The "frozen" positions are as follows: Economic Development
Coordinator, Planner II, Police Traffic Specialist, Police Property
Control/Evidence Technician, Senior Police Officer and the Public
Works Director. These reductions in staff will not affect the
current level of services provided by the City nor are we proposing
any layoffs.
Staff is requesting authority to fill the positions of Planner I
and convert the Engineer Intern to Engineering Technician (non
general funds monies) as soon as possible. Allow the Assistant
Building Official to be filled in March 1992. These three
positions have been budgeted accordingly.
City departments have reduced expenditures in other areas besides
personnel. These expenditure reductions were reviewed by Council
during the December 3rd study session. Additional expenditure
reductions were to be reviewed by staff and presented to Council.
These reductions have now been addressed by the following measures.
County Booking fee expenditures (AB2557) are less than anticipated.
The difference between the budgeted amount and the anticipated
expenditure for the two years is $26,500.
The County tax administrative fee (AB2557) is anticipated to be
less than the budgeted amount. The difference between the budgeted
amount and the anticipated expenditure is $11,640.
With the Council adoption of the resolution recovering the AB939
cost of waste management there is an anticipated revenue gain of
$21,000. This will partially offset the cost of the contract
awarded by Council for the waste management study.
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE BUDGET FOR THE
1991-92 FISCAL YEAR
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Budget for the City of San Jacinto for the fiscal
year commencing July 1 1991, and ending June 30, 1992, as prepared
and submitted by the City Manager and as modified by the City
Council, was adopted July 24, 1991 with Resolution No. 1983.
Section 2. Resolution No. 1983 is hereby amended; reflecting a
decrease in the General Fund in the amount of $740,000 in revenues
and expenditures for said fiscal year.
Section 3. Said amendments are deemed prudent and necessary for
the continued operation of the City of San Jacinto General Fund.
Section 4. Total appropriations within accounts will be increased
or decreased only by amendment of the budget by motion of the City
Council.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
resolution.
MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED on this 17 day of December, 1991, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk Mayor
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance Director
SUBJECT: 1990-91 ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT
DATE: December 17, 1991
RECO
1 104
ATION
RECEIVE AND FILE
BACKGROUND
/117
e
The City Council awarded the bid to Conrad & Associates for the
fiscal year 1990-91 audit. Conrad & Assoc. has completed that
audit and have forwarded their recommendation via a management
letter.
In the last few days City and Audit firm staff met with the Finance
subcommittee and individual Councilmembers to discuss the audit
management letter. From those recommendations, two comments will
need to be addressed by the City Council with direction to staff.
The Auditors recommendations include a reduction in general fund
expenditures for the current fiscal year and upcoming fiscal years.
This issue is being addressed by the City Council during this
meeting and in January 1992. The second recommendations is to
review the water and sewer rates in order to provide funding for
depreciation and future replacement costs. With regards to this
recommendation, Council requested a water and sewer master plan
study which will assist in determining future and current needs.
Once this study is complete, staff will be able to recommend rate
alternative to council.
STAFF PO
To:
From: Chief of Police
Date:
to
T
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
December 11, 1991
Subject: Alarm Ordinance
RECO 1 1 SATION: Introduce Ordinance 944 for a Second Reading and
Waive the Reading In Full.
CO 1 1 NTS: On December 3, 1991 Council adopted Ordinance 944
entitled "Alarm Ordinance" which repealed Ordinance 937 and made
only a slight change in Section 8.20.070.
This is the seconding reading of Ordinance 944.
ORDINANCE NO. 944
21
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
3 REPEALING CHAPTER 8.20 OF TITLE 8 OF
SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL CODE
4 RELATING TO ALARM SYSTEMS AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 8.20.
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
191
20
1
21
22
23
24
25
26'
27
28
The City Council of the City of San Jacinto does hereby
ordain as follows:
Section 1. Chapter 8.20 of Title 8 of the San Jacinto
Municipal Code is hereby repealed and new Chapter 8.20 is
added as follows:
A. New subsections 8.20.010 through and
including subsection 8.20.100 are as
follows:
CHAPTER 8.20
ALARM SYSTEM
8.20.010 - Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to set forth regulations
governing burglary and robbery alarm systems, require
permits therefor, establish fees, and provide for
punishment of violation of provisions of this chapter.
8.20.020 - Definitions
For the purpose of this chapter, certain words and
phrases used herein are defined as follows:
A. ALARM AGENT is a person defined as such in the Alarm
Company Act contained in the State of California
Business & Professions Code, Division 3, Chapter
11.6 - Alarm Companies.
B. ALARM COMPANY OPERATOR is a person defined as such
in the Alarm Company Act contained in the State of
California Business & Professions Code, Division 3,
Chapter 11.6 - Alarm Companies.
H
11,
2 I
3 H
4
5I
6
III
10
11!
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
1
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C. ALARM SYSTEM means an assembly of equipment and
devices arranged to signal the presence of a
hazardous condition requiring urgent attention
to which police customarily respond, and
includes devices which emit an audible sound in or
on the premises when actuated.
1. COMMERCIAL ALARM SYSTEM means an alarm system
that is used to detect a hazardous condition in
or about a non-residential structure or area.
2. RESIDENTIAL ALARM SYSTEM means an alarm system
that is used to detect a hazardous condition in
or about a structure or area that is used
primarily for non -business purposes and
intended for habitation, including individual
dwelling unit(s) within a single or multiple
family structure.
D. ALARM USER'S PERMIT means a document containing
pertinent information about the alarmed premises and
its authorized user as required by the Chief of
Police.
E. AUDIBLE ALARM means that type of alarm system which,
when activated, emits an audible sound.
F. AUTOMATIC PROTECTION DEVICE means a device that
reports a hazardous condition to a remote location
over the regular telephone network by dialing a
preprogrammed telephone number then delivering a
prerecorded voice message identifying the nature and
location of the alarm.
G. CITY means City of San Jacinto.
H. CHIEF OF POLICE means the Chief of Police of the
City of San Jacinto or his authorized
representative.
1. FALSE ALARM means an alarm signal to which police
respond, or are summoned to respond, but where a
hazardous condition does not exist, but does not
include signals caused through circumstances beyond
the control of the alarm user, such as telephone
line interferences or outages, or acts of nature.
2
1
2 k
31
4
51
8
1
121
13
14
15
16
1
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
J. HAZARDOUS CONDITION means an event(s) or
occurrence(s) which is indicative of a robbery,
burglary, or other condition which poses a hazard or
threat to persons or property and for which the
alarm system is intended to detect or alert.
K. PERSON means any individual, partnership, firm,
company, association, organization, or corporation.
L. POLICE DEPARTMENT means the Police Department of the
City of San Jacinto, California.
8.20.030 - City Business License Requirements
A. No alarm company operator or alarm agent shall be
permitted to sell on premises, alter, install,
maintain, move, repair, replace, respond, lease, or
monitor any alarm system without first obtaining a
city business license to operate within the City.
8.20.040 - Conditions
Each person utilizing any alarm system shall comply with
the following conditions.
A. Audible Alarms
Audible "commercial" alarm systems shall be equipped
with an automatic shut-off mechanism capable of
terminating the audible annunciator after activation
within a maximum time of thirty (30) minutes.
Audible "residential" alarm systems shall be
equipped with an automatic shut-off device capable
of terminating the audible annunciator after
activation within a maximum time of fifteen (15)
minutes.
The annunciator, when activated, shall not resemble
the sound of any type of sirens utilized by
emergency vehicles.
B. Power Requirements
The alarm system shall not transmit a signal nor
activate an annunciator indicating the existence of
a hazardous condition when its power is interrupted
or restored unless a hazardous condition does, in
fact, exist.
1
2C. Emergency Information
1'
311
1
1
4
5
1
6
7
9
10
111
12
13
14
15
16
17,
18
19
20
211
22
23
24
25
26
27
28!
Emergency information relating to persons who can be
contacted reference alarm activations shall be the
responsibility of the alarm monitoring service on
those commercial or residential systems so designed.
Emergency information relating to persons who can be
contacted reference alana activation on non -
monitoring services shall be filed with the Police
Department concurrently with the issue or renewal of
the required Alarm User's Permit required in Section
8.20.050. The Police Department shall be notified
immediately of any changes in persons responsible
for operating the alarm system.
D. Automatic Protection Devices
Automatic protection devices shall not be keyed to
any police department telephone line.
E. Multiple Premises
Any person who occupies more than one building,
suite, office, or other tenancy in which an alarm
system is installed or used, and the alarm system is
monitored, shall adjust or alter the alarm system to
automatically indicate to the person receiving the
alarm, which building, office, suite, or tenancy
from which the alarm originates.
F. Public Nuisance
The City Council hereby deems a public nuisance any
alarm system which by the operation, malfunction or
misuse violates the provisions and conditions set
forth in Sections 8.20.040A or 8.20.040D and in
doing so, directs the Police Department to cause to
be disconnected or disabled the alarm system or
component part(s) causing the nuisance until
corrective measures can be taken by the system user
or owner.
8.20.050 - Alarm User's Permit Required
An Alarm User's Permit to operate an alarm system shall
be obtained by the responsible owner of each alarmed
premise, having a different mailing address, in
compliance with the following conditions:
4
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
A. The Alarm User's Permit shall be obtained from the
21: City of San Jacinto prior to utilizing the alarm
system. Systems that are in use prior to the
3 effective date of this Chapter shall have one
hundred and twenty (120) days in which to obtain the
4 Alarm User's Permit.
5 B. An Alarm User's Permit Fee shall be paid for the
Alarm User's Permit as required by City Council
6 1 Resolution at the time of Business License renewal
or as otherwise specified herein.
C. Persons applying for an Alarm User's Permit for
a residential alarm system, who are sixty (60) years
of age or over, shall be exempt from paying a fee
but shall otherwise comply with all other provisions
of this Chapter.
D. Any person applying for an Alarm User's Permit who
is a governmental entity or a public school district
shall be exempt from paying a fee, but shall
otherwise comply with all provisions of this
Chapter.
E. Alarm User's Permits shall be non -transferable to
other persons or locations, thereby requiring a new
permit upon any change of business owner, resident,
or location.
F. Possession of an Alarm User's Permit shall not
guarantee the availability of Police response nor
preclude the discontinuance of Police response due
to violations set forth in Section 8.20.070.
G. An Alarm User's Permit shall not be renewed if
Police response has been discontinued as provided
herein.
H. It shall be unlawful for any person to use or
operate an alarm system without first obtaining an
Alarm User's Permit.
8.20.060 - Alarm Systems Terminating at City
Police Department's Alarm Panel
A. Any alarm system to be considered for connection to
the Police Alarm Panel must be approved by the Chief
of Police.
B. Residential alarm systems will not be accepted for
connection to the Police Alarm Panel.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C. Such alarm systems shall not be tested by the Police
Department, at the person's request, more than once
per month, unless authorized by the Chief of Police.
D. The Chief of Police may order such alarm systems to
be disconnected if they violate any section of this
chapter.
E. An Alarm User's Permit must be obtained and the
required fee for alarms terminating at the Police
Panel paid prior to connection.
8.20.070 - Termination of Police Services
Violation of any portion of the below written
subparagraphs "A" through "E" may result in
discontinuance of Police Response to any alarm signal
received by the Police Department and may not be
reinstated until authorized by the Chief of Police. A
reinstatement charge shall be assessed in such amount as
the City Council may determine by resolution.
A. False Alarms
1. The following schedule lists the number of
allowable false alarms within the specified
time period:
a. Four (4) false alarms within any 365-day
period.
In addition to the discontinuance of police
response by reason of excessive false alarms as
provided herein, the owner of the alarmed
premises shall be subject to such
administrative fees for false response as may
be determined from time to time by resolution
of the City Council.
2. Exception:
a. A thirty (30) day adjustment period to
correct mechanical problems will be
allowed for any new, improved, or replaced
alarm system.
6
2
311,
5
7
9
12
1
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
2611
27
2811
B. Intentional Activations
1. The intentional activation of an alarm system
by any person, when a hazardous condition does
not exist, shall be cause for immediate
discontinuance of Police response. Such
hazardous conditions are to include only those
which the person's alarm system was
specifically designed to protect or to alert
the Police Department.
C. Non-payment of Alarm User's Permit fee and/or Police
alarm panel fee.
D. Non-compliance with the Business and Professions
Code of the State of California and San Jacinto
Municipal Code as it pertains to alarm users
contracting with unlicensed alarm company operators
or alarm agents.
E. Non-compliance with the provisions of Sections
8.20.040A or 8.20.040D.
8.20.080 - Appeals to Council
Any person whose alarm service is ordered discontinued by
the Chief of Police may appeal such decision to the City
Council within fifteen (15) days from the date such order
is issued. If appealed, such order of discontinuance or
termination shall not be operative until the City Council
rules on said appeal. The City Council may affirm,
modify, or overrule the order of the Chief of Police.
8.20.090 - Severability Clause
If any section or part of any section of this Chapter is
for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by
the decision of any court or competent jurisdiction, the
remainder hereof not thereby invalidated shall remain in
full force and effect. The Council of the City of San
Jacinto hereby declares that it is the intent of such
Council that it would have passed all the other portions
of this Chapter independent of the elimination herefrom
of any such portion as may be declared invalid.
i
1
2
3111
4
5
6
7
8
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8.20.100 - Violation - Penalty
A. Infraction. Notwithstanding the assessment of any
other assessments, fees, or charges, contained
herein above, any person violating any provisions of
this ordinance is guilty of an infraction and upon
conviction thereof shall be punished by:
1. A fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100)
for a first violation;
2. A fine not exceeding two hundred dollars ($200)
for a second violation of this ordinance within
one (1) year;
3. A fine not exceeding five hundred dollars
($500) for each additional violation of this
ordinance within one (1) year.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the said City
Council on the rd day of flPr-Pmher , 1991.
MOVED, PASSED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
the City Council on the 17th day of
1991 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
1-)PrPmhpr
Mayor
Deputy City Clerk
8
DATE:
STAFF REPORT
December 17, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Interim Deputy City Clerk
SUBJECT: Jones Intercable Consent to Assign Security
Interest
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. amending Franchise to
allow assignment of security interest.
BACKGROUND: A request by Jones Intercable was received to amend
the franchise agreement to allow assignment of security interest.
This request was made in compliance with a request by Jones'
lending institutions. The matter was reviewed by the City Attorney
and he had no objection to the request. The City Attorney did,
however, add an additional clause in Section 2 of the Resolution to
preserve the City's right to terminate the franchise with assignees
or successors.
THOMAS M. COX
_AMES A. COX
BEVERLY M. CAMPER
December 4, 1991
COX, COX 8c CAMPER
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
805 EAST FLORIDA AVENUE
HEMET, CALIFORNIA 92343
TELEPHONE
AREA CODE 714
652-1400
FAX 714I 652-3990
To: Pamela Lee
From: Jim Cox
Re: Jones Cable's Proposed Resolution for consent of City to
Allow Assignment of Franchise for Security Purposes
Dear Pam,
I have reviewed the documents you have provided to me with regard to
Jones' request. I see no strong reason why we should not cooperate
with the request. The risk involved is that we might end up with
one of Jones' lenders as our franchisee if Jones were to default on
a loan secured by the franchise. This is not probably likely to
happen. In any event, I have suggested language to be added to the
resolution confirming our right to terminate the franchise if the
assigned franchisee defaulted or was otherwise unqualified inder the
terms of our franchise codes. Thanks.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING JONES
INTERCABLE OF SAN DIEGO, INC., TO MORTGAGE, PLEDGE
OR GRANT A SECURITY INTEREST IN THE NON-EXCLUSIVE
CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE, THE CABLE TELEVISION
SYSTEM OR ANY PART THEREOF
WHEREAS, on June 18, 1985, the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, State of California (the "City of San Jacinto") adopted
Ordinance No. 788, providing for the granting of franchises for
cable television systems; and
WHEREAS, on March 7, 1989, the City of San Jacinto adopted
Resolution No. 1813 granting to Jones Intercable of San Diego, Inc.
("Jones"), a non-exclusive cable television franchise (the
"franchise"); and.
WHEREAS, Jones intends, from time to time, to enter into
financing arrangements with its lending institution or institutions
and such lending institution or institutions generally require
Jones to pledge the assets of its cable television systems,
including the Franchise as security for its loans; and.
WHEREAS, Section 7 of Ordinance No. 788 may require the
consent of the City of San Jacinto for an assignment of the
Franchise by Jones to its lending institution or institutions as
security for its loans.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of San Jacinto as follows:
1. Jones may from time to time mortgage, hypothecate or
grant a security interest in the Franchise to its lending
institution or institutions, which institution or
institutions shall have all the rights and remedies of a
secured party under the applicable Uniform Commercial
Code, and however, the consent granted in this Resolution
shall not be construed to impair any rights of City as
are contained in Chapter 5.60 of the San Jacinto
Municipal Code, including, but not limited to, City's
rights to terminate the franchise as against Grantee's
interest or as against the interests of Grantee's
assignees or successors in interest.
2. A true, correct and complete copy of the Franchise is
attached as Exhibit A. The franchise is valid, binding
and in full force and effect and is not in default.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this l7th day of December, 1991, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Francis R. Boykin, Mayor
ATTEST:
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jim Cox, City Attorney
The foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No.
on file in this office.
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
November 25, 1991
City Council
City of San Jacinto
City Hall
201 E. Main Street
San Jacinto, California 92583
Re: Consent to Grant of Security Interest in Franchise
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The City of San Jacinto, California, by Ordinance No.
1813, enacted on March 7, 1989, granted a cable television
franchise to Jones Intercable of San Diego, Inc. ("Jones").
Jones intends, from time to time, to enter into
financing arrangements with its lending institution or
institutions and such lending institution or institutions
generally require Jones to pledge the assets of its cable
television systems, including the Franchise as security for
its loans.
Section 7 of Ordinance No. 788, adopted on June 18,
1985, may require the consent of the City of San Jacinto for
an assignment of the Franchise by Jones as security for its
loans. Although from the context of such section, it
appears that such provision is intended to apply only to
actual transfers of the Franchise from the franchisee to a
new operator, a literal reading of the language could limit
Jones' ability to grant a security interest in the Franchise
without your prior consent. In order to avoid any doubt on
this matter, by this letter, we are seeking such consent and
have attached hereto a form of resolution for such purposes.
10783 Jamacha Blvd., Suite 7, Spring Valley, CA 91978 619/660-8112
M/F/H/V Employer
We would appreciate your consideration of this matter
at your next City Council meeting. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call Ben Blackmon,
general manager for Jones Intercable of San Diego, Inc. at
(619) 660-8112 or Sherry Gilmore, legal assistant for Jones
Intercable of San Diego, Inc. at (800) 525-7002.
Respectfully,
JONES INTERCABLE OF SAN DIEGO, INC.
Ben Blackmon
General Manager
BB:nb
Enclosure
c: City Manager; Pamela Easter
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Community Development Director
DATE: December 17, 1991
SUBJECT: RANCHO SAN JACINTO • GATION WELL
Recommendation:
Authorize the City Manager to negotiate an agreement with Peacock-Radaker for the
purchase of the Rancho San Jacinto Irrigation Well and a 1.3 acre site at a cost not to
exceed $40,000. The cost of purchase is to be borne by Community Facilities District No.
2.
Fiscal Analysis:
The Community Facilities District has funds available for the purchase of property and
facilities for the landscape and irrigation system.
Background Analysis:
The City has nearly completed the installation of landscaping and irrigation for Rancho San
Jacinto Phase I. The source of irrigation water is an old well, located on Peacock-Radaker
property, which was reactivated solely to provide water for landscape irrigation. Now that
construction is nearly complete, Peacock-Radaker has requested that the City formalize an
agreement to purchase the well, well site and access easement to maintain the well. They
are proposing granting the City the well on a 1.3 acre, triangular shaped parcel of property
bounded by Mountain Avenue, the flood control channel and a future single family
residential project. The site could also be utilized to locate the weather station which will
control the irrigation system. Attached is a site plan showing the property.
Attachment
(f)
40' 6'
Existing
ROW
°O
7
Vacan
appITIONAL PER IN.177N4
12EL
/6, e 8. 6 4 T. P, (PROPOS Er
TOP OF PAVEMENT E LE
PER TRACT 23963)
?O' ACCESS
EASEMENT
- e 1/43- cc 6s
6s/
Lot 2 >• 11-A-'
•< \
1.Q7 ac. A. /
/ / 0.
,,.. rr
/ 0
Ei ,
,,D4• A ,
/ // ..„..., 00 ,
--, /
; fl)-TAll__ / /-
< / / , /
— I ' / N
/,..,/ N, / / .,.
)/ /
B91444(2" \Ai
90.00'
Lot 1
0 7 ac.
LI)
L
0
z
0
z
,—PROPOS
STRE
al •
D
LIGHT
Vacant
SAN JACINTD
7
SHVER
EVNS
ESP ANA E
COMMON WELTN
WASHINGTON AVE.
P<IRk
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Counci
FROM: Les Evans, Interim Director of Public Works
DATE: December 17, 1991
SUBJECT: Selection of Consultant to Prepare Transportation
Master Plan and Circulation Element
Recommendation:
Approve the selection of Robert Kahn, John Kain & Associates, Inc. to prepare a
Transportation Master Plan and Circulation Element for a fee of $20,000 and authorize the
Mayor to execute an appropriate contract.
Fiscal Analysis:
Presently the approved budget includes $7000 to perform this study. The consultant has
proposed a fee of $31,000 for Tasks 1 through 4 in the attached proposal. Staff recommends
that Task 4 be performed by City staff which reduces the fee to $20,000. The additional
$13,000 is available in Fund 21, Accounts 2400 and 2710.
Background and Analysis
As the City of San Jacinto continues to develop the need for additional transportation
improvements such as street widening, traffic signals and bridges becomes more and more
evident. Many of these improvement will be constructed by developers as a condition of
subdivisions. Others will be constructed utilizing gasoline taxes, Measure "A" funds and
other grant money. However, a mechanism must be implemented to insure that each new
development pays its fair share of transportation improvements. The logical mechanism is
establishment of a traffic mitigation fee to be paid by new development in accordance with
the amount of new traffic which that development will create.
The Kahn-Kain proposal includes development of an ultimate transportation network for
the City and preparation of a Draft Circulation Element update. These products will form
the basis of a traffic mitigation fee program for roadway improvements which will be
prepared by City staff.
•
ert a n, J • al
& Associates, Inc.
Transportation Planning • Traffic/Acoustical Engineering
December 2, 1991
Mr. Les Evans
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
201 East Main Street
San Jacinto, CA 92583
Subject: City of San Jacinto General Plan Circulation Element
and Fee Program Traffic Analysis
Dear Mr. Evans:
INTRODUCTION
The firm of ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. is pleased to
submit this proposal to provide the transportation analysis of the
City of San Jacinto General Plan Circulation Element update. This
proposal outlines a Scope of Work which includes the refinement of
a cumulative analysis model for the purpose of forecasting future
traffic volumes throughout the City. The cumulative analysis model
will provide the areawide data base needed to address (1) citywide
traffic issues in terms of the orientation of routes and link
capacity requirements, and (2) potential citywide fees for
circulation improvements.
SCOPE OF WORK
The following Scope of Work is proposed by ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN
& ASSOCIATES, INC. in response to City needs as expressed during
recent telephone discussions.
The transportation analysis work will occur in four major work
tasks:
1. Data Collection/Analysis of Existing Conditions
2. Analysis of Study Area Buildout Traffic Conditions
3. Draft Circulation Element Update
4. Interim Fee Program
4101 Birch Street, Suite 100, Newport Beach, California 92660
(714) 474-0809 • FAX (714) 474-0902
Mr. Les Evans
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
December 2, 1991
Page 2
TASK 1 - Data Collection and Analysis of Existing Conditions
This task will involve the assessment of the adequacy of the
existing street system and the current need for improvements to
address near -term growth needs.
A circulation system can be thought of as consisting of
intersections connected together by links of roadway. To dimension
the existing traffic conditions, it is necessary to document the
existing intersection and link characteristics as follows:
1.1 Collection of additional existing daily traffic volume data
at up to 10 link locations.
1.2 Inventory of existing intersection controls and through
travel lanes on key roadway links throughout the City
sphere of influence.
1.3 Calculation of daily volume to capacity values for existing
conditions on study area links.
1.4 Review of recent traffic circulation studies, reports, and
other traffic documents pertinent to understanding the
City's transportation system.
TASK 2 - Analysis of Study Area Buildout Traffic Conditions
This task will involve the generation of anticipated daily traffic
volumes for General Plan land uses and distribution of these
volumes to the future proposed roadway network.
2.1 Refinement of traffic forecasting methodology for a study
area which focuses on the City of San Jacinto sphere of
influence, based upon the cumulative analysis procedures
utilized in the Sunrise Ranch Traffic Study.
2.2 The study area will be divided into a number of traffic
analysis zones. These zones will enable determinations to
be made for various types of roadway requirements.
2.3 The existing City of San Jacinto and County of Riverside
Circulation Elements network will be coded for modeling
purposes.
Mr. Les Evans
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
December 2, 1991
Page 3
2.4 Future trip generation characteristics will be estimated
for each zone, based upon existing General Plan land use
data compiled by the CITY OF SAN JACINTO for buildout
conditions.
2.5 Future internal -external traffic patterns and through -
traffic patterns will be determined, based upon capacity
characteristics as well as RIVSAN model data.
2.6 Future study area trip interactions between zones and
cordon stations will be calculated, based upon manually
input trip distribution patterns.
2.7 Study area traffic and through -traffic will be assigned to
the future network to estimate future volumes for the
preferred alternative City land use plan.
2.8 Evaluation of network capacities and roadway
classifications required to achieve Level of Service
"C"/"D" for the preferred alternative City land use plan on
an ADT basis. The City may desire to maintain Level of
Service "C", however, Level of Service "D" may be
considered in commercial -industrial areas on a case -by -case
basis. To maintain consistency with the current roadway
system the Typical Cross Sections Riverside County Highways
and the Highway Capacity for Riverside County General Plan
Roads could be the starting point for formulating the
future circulation element roadway system.
2.9 Identification of network features and/or land use changes
for a mitigation scenario. This may include roadway
classifications changes with the addition of lanes, and new
roadway corridor alignments.
2.10 The mitigation scenario network will be coded for modeling
purposes.
2.11 Future trip generation characteristics will be estimated
for each zone, based upon mitigation scenario land use data
compiled by the CITY OF SAN JACINTO for buildout
conditions.
2.12 Future internal -external traffic patterns and through -
traffic patterns will be determined for the mitigation
scenario.
Mr. Les Evans
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
December 2, 1991
Page 4
2.13 Future study area trip interactions between zones and
cordon stations will be calculated, based upon manually
input trip distribution patterns.
2.14 Study area traffic and through -traffic will be assigned to
the future network to estimate future volumes for the
mitigation scenario.
2.15 Evaluation of network capacities and roadway
classifications required to achieve Level of Service
"C"/"D" for the mitigation scenario on an ADT basis.
2.16 The final results of the City of San Jacinto Circulation
Analysis will be contained in a summary document. The
summary document will provide background information on the
cumulative analysis procedure. A recommended buildout
transportation network will be identified as part of this
report.
TASK 3 - Draft Circulation Element Update
This task will involve the formulation of the Draft Circulation
Element Update for review by the City and public comment.
3.1 Attend two meetings with City staff to address circulation
issues.
3.2 Attend study session with the Planning Commission and/or
City Council to discuss traffic concerns and present
analysis results.
3.3 Compile the Draft Circulation Element test and maps which
will address (1) Existing Conditions and Issues; (2) Goals,
Objectives and Policies; (3) the Circulation Plan; (4)
Alternative Modes of Transportation; and (5) Implementation
Policies. The element will be responsive to the objectives
of the City in planning for its future growth while at the
same time mitigating existing problems or concerns. The
circulation element will present policies which will serve
to guide the evaluation of impacts at each phase of
development in a manner similar to current County of
Riverside Transportation Department requirements.
Mr. Les Evans
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
December 2, 1991
Page 5
Task 4 - Interim Fee Program
This task will provide the traffic assessment in support of a
citywide fee program for roadway improvements in the City of San
Jacinto.
4.1 Compile unit cost factors for various types of roadway
improvements.
4.2 Identify key roadway improvements needed throughout the
City to serve areawide growth.
4.3 Calculate estimated costs for improvements using typical
unit cost factors.
4.4 Calculate fees for roadway improvements which are related
to new development.
4.5 Prepare an illustrated traffic study report with findings,
methodology, and supporting data.
4.6 Attend one public hearing to present study findings.
PROFESSIONAL FEES
The fee for the work outlined in this proposal shall be based upon
personnel charges plus direct expenses. Monthly billings from
ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. will be based upon the
attached Exhibit A - BILLING RATES FOR ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN &
ASSOCIATES, INC..
Estimates of fee allocations by task are provided in Exhibit B.
TIME SCHEDULE
It is estimated that the Draft Circulation Element Update and
Interim Fee Program will take approximately 45 working days to
complete from the date of authorization, and date of receipt of
data essential for the study. Additionally, any delays resulting
from circumstances beyond our control, such as availability of
accurate land use data for the study area, shall extend the time
schedule.
Mr. Les Evans
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
December 2, 1991
Page 6
QUALIFICATIONS
ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. is located in Newport
Beach, California and specializes in transportation planning and
traffic/acoustical engineering for governmental agencies and the
business community. The firm principals have over 40 years of
combined engineering and planning experience throughout Southern
California at the regional, local and individual project levels.
The experience of the firm's personnel in transportation planning
and traffic/acoustical engineering provides the special skills
necessary for determining practical and meaningful traffic
solutions. Resumes of key personnel within the firm are attached.
John Kain and Robert Kahn have overseen the development of numerous
areawide traffic model applications, including the following:
Saddleback Area Circulation Study (Mission Viejo and Aliso
Viejo)
East Chula Vista Traffic Model
Highlands Ranch Community Traffic Study (Denver, Colorado)
Santa Margarita Areawide Traffic Model
Chino Hills/Ramona Avenue Extension Traffic Model
Talega Traffic Model
Bolsa Chica Areawide Traffic Model
Lake Elsinore General Plan Traffic Model
Hesperia General Plan Traffic Model
Route 62/1-10 Areawide Buildout Traffic Model
Washington Street/I-10 Interchange Areawide Traffic Model
Southwest District Traffic Model (City of Murrieta)
Mr. Les Evans
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
December 2, 1991
Page 7
If you have any questions regarding this Scope of Work, please do
not hesitate to give me a call at (714) 474-0809.
Respectfully submitted,
ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Kain, AICP
ncipal
JK:nad/2163
JN:328-91-001
Attachments
CONTRACT APPROVAL
Approved by:
Title:
Firm:
Date:
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
EXHIBIT A
BILLING RATES FOR ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Compensation for Services
The Consultants Billing rates for services are as follows:
Staff
Hourly Rate
Principal $100.00
Associate Engineer $ 80.00
Senior Engineer $ 70.00
Transportation Planner $ 60.00
Engineering Technician $ 35.00
Word Processing/Administrative Assistant $ 35.00
General
(1) Reimbursable direct costs, such as reproduction, supplies, messenger service,
long-distance telephone calls, travel and traffic counts will be billed at cost plus
ten (10) percent.
(2) Hourly rates apply to work time, travel time and time spent at public hearings
and meetings.
(3) For overtime work and public meetings, the above rates may be increased 50
percent.
(4) Billing statements for work will be submitted monthly. Statements are payable
within thirty (30) days of the receipt by Company of statement. Any statement
unpaid after thirty (30) days shall be subject to interest at the maximum
permitted by law.
June 4, 1990
,Robert Kahn, John Kain
Associates, Inc.
EXHIBIT B
ESTIMATED FEE ALLOCATIONS BY TASK
TASK
ESTIMATED
COST
1
2
3
4
$ 3,500
$ 12,000
$ 4,500
$ 11,000
TOTAL $ 31,000
STAFF ' PO T
To: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
From: Chief of Police
Date: December 11, 1991
Subject: Declaring Certain City Property As Scrap Or Surplus And
Authorizing Disposal In Accordance With Law
RECO 1 1 1 ATION: Declare Property Listed on Exhibit "A" As Surplus
or Scrap and Authorize Disposal In Accordance With Lawful Requirements
CO 1 1. NTS: The City of San Jacinto has for several years
accumulated property through purchase or through law enforcement
authorized seizures. As a result of ageing, damage beyond repair,
prohibitive operational costs and other such factors, the City is
authorized to dispose of such property.
Exhibit "A" provides a list of property, by status,
and staff is recommending Council authorize disposal in accordance
with the law.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
23
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
DECLARING CERTAIN PROPERTY SCRAP AND AUTHORIZING DISPOSAL OF
SAID PROPERTY IN THE LEAST COSTLY MANNER
WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto from time to time accumulates
property not useable as a result of breakage or damage beyond repair, and;
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto in an
effort not to harbor property which cannot be used or is not cost
effective to repair has the authority to declare the property scrap;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of
San Jacinto declares said property as shown on Attachment "A" to be
scrap and authorizes the disposal of said property in the least costly
manner.
MOVED, PASSED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City
Council on the day of
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
, 1991.
Mayor
1'111;
ITEM
1977 Plymouth Trailblazer 4 X 4
VIN#1C3BF66P9HW130502
1985 Ford LTD 4 door Sedan
VIN#1FABP39M1FG213024
IT "A"
216 Bicycles - Various sizes both boys
and girls. All bicycles have been
run through the National Crime
Information System Stolen Property
Files and show no ownership.
40 Pieces of various size (4" to 18")
miscellaneous water fittings and odds
and ends.
1 Special built utility trailer,
Flatbed type
1 Special built 5th wheel trailer,
Flatbed type
VIN# MU1187
DISPOSITION
Scrap
Scrap
Surplus
Scrap
Surplus
Surplus
Asplundh Chipper, License #E15480 Surplus
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: December 10, 1991
SUBJECi: Final Release of Bonds for Tract 22677
APPLICANT: Ann Arbor Homes, Inc.
LOCATION: East of Hewitt Street, south of Seventh Street
BACKGROUND
On October 30, 1990 the City Council accepted the public improvements for Tract 22677
(Ann Arbor Homes) and reduced the bond amount to $10,000 for any necessary
maintenance. The bonds were eligible for release on November 6, 1991. Since use of the
bonds was not necessary, it is recommended that the bonds be released.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the bonds be released and the following agencies/individuals be
notified by the City Clerk:
Barney & Barney
P.O. Box 85638
San Diego, CA 92138-9079
2. Judi Sloat
Monfric Inc.
P.O. Box 81901
San Diego, CA 92138
Resptfu11y Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DA1E: December 12, 1991
SUBJ: REIMBURSEMENT OF THE STA°l`E STREET WA'l'ER LINE
EXTENSION
The City of San Jacinto has a policy to install a twelve (12) inch water line in State
Street to service the commercial and industrial properties with sufficient water flows.
Basic Shelter, Inc. is the developer of the shopping center located on the southwest
corner of Ramona Boulevard and State Street. As a development condition, it was
required the developer install in State Street a twelve (12) inch water line from Ramona
Boulevard southerly to the south property line of the project.
Because of the City Council policy forbidding dead end water lines, staff required the
developer to extend the water line to DeAnza Drive, a total distance of 782 feet. This
was an unexpected expense to the developer as the policy was not in effect when the
project was approved.
The water main noted above is part of the overall master plan of water lines. As such, it
could be very well be on the list of City water improvements.
Requiring the developer to install and pay for this water line so late in the project placed
an undue economic burden on the developer.
Staff recommends the City Council approve the request for the reimbursement of the
water line in the sum of $17,869.10.
Respectfully,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: December 12, 1991
SUBJ: FUTURE WIDENING AND INSTALLATION OF CURB, GUTTER,
SIDEWALK, AND STREET IMPROVEMENT
730 Ramona Expressway
APN 434-080-032
The City's General Plan designates State Street as a 110' major highway with a street paving
of 86' curb face to curb face. Currently most of right of way along State Street is 88' with
a street pavement of 64' curb face to curb face.
The City has obtained the required right of way along State Street via a parcel map the City
approved.
The City has ordinances requiring the installation of street improvements when substantial
on site improvements are to be made.
The City has in the past secured agreements from property owners along State Street for
the eventual widening and installation of all street improvements at a future date.
Attached is the signed agreement to install the required public improvements at the time
the City request the widening of State Street.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council grant the property owner their request allowing the
future widening and the installation of curbs, gutters, and sidewalk, and street pavement to
be installed at some later date to be determined by the City.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
2245 W. Whittier Blvd. • La Habra, California 90631 • (310) 694-3789 • FAX (310) 697-1571
December 3, 1991
Mr. Brian McNabb, Director of Comm. Dev.
City of San Jacinto
201 East Main Street
San Jacinto, CA 92583
Re: Agreement/T-24594
Dear Brian,
Please find enclosed the fully executed agreement
for street widening, curbs, gutter, sidewalks, paving
and other Public Improvements per your letter dated
November 21, 1991.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call our
office.
Sincerely,
Joe Lacko, General Partner
whead Pacific
JL/le
Enclosure
RECORPTivl REQ1UESTED BY:
City of Sao Jacinto
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
P. O. Box
San Jacinto, CA 92383
AGREE 1 NT
(RE: Street Widening, Curbs, Gutters, Sidewalks,
Paving and Other Public Improvements)
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this34-- day of 1991, by and
between ARRO 1 II PACIFIC, A CALIFORNIA PARTNERSHIP, hereinafter referred
to as First Party, and the City of San Jacinto, California, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "CITY".
VVITNESSETH
and;
First Parties are the present owner of the hereinafter described real property,
Ordinances of said "CITY" require the widening of State Street, and the
installation of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, and matching street paving and,
1 ' • the present owners do not desire at this time to widen State Street and install
curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and matching street paving and,
the "CITY" does presently find that the widening and installation of the
required improvements cited above at this time would be impractical and said "CITY" is
willing to waive the requirements of said improvements at this time, but said "CITY" will
require said installations to be made by the said property owner or her successors or assigns
at some future date as may be determined by the "CTTY".
1
NOW, REFO ' it is hereby agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows:
That the widening of State Street and the installation of the improvements,
including the installation of curbs, gutters, drive approaches, sidewalks, paving
and other street improvements as may be required by said "CITY", be
deferred for such a period of time as may be determined by the "CITY" upon
the following terms and conditions.
2. That when said "CITY" deems that the widening and the installation of curbs,
gutters, sidewalks, installation of standard roadway between the lip of the new
gutter and edge of existing pavement, or the center line of the street, and
other public improvements are necessary, the "CITY" shall give written notice
to the owners of said real property to make said improvements, or pay their
fair share of the improvements within ninety (90) days from the date of the
written notice given to the property owners requiring that said installations or
payment be made.
3 That in the event that the said property owners fail or refuse to make the
required public and/or private improvements or pay the required cost of
improvements within the time allotted, the "CITY" shall have the option of
bringing such legal action as the law may afford to enforce the installation of
said public improvements or the "CITY' at its sole option may make said
HBURNSAGR
improvements and may either enforce the collection of said costs of said
public improvements by such legal actions, together with reasonable attomey's
fees and costs, or may cause said costs of said improvements to be made a
lien against the real property as herein described.
4. That the real property referred to herein is all that real property located in
the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, and more particularly described as:
Parcels 3 Parcel Map 24594 recorded February 13, 1990 as shown by
map on file in Parcel Maps, records County of Riverside.
5. It is understood and agreed by the parties that this agreement shall be
recorded with the County of Riverside, and shall be binding upon the heirs,
transferees, successors and assii. of the parties hereto. Time is declared the
essence of this agreement and this contract shall be deemed to have been
executed and to be performed in the County of Riverside, State of California.
IN WI SS REOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day
and year first written above.
Arrowhead Pacific
A California General Partnership
]) Windrhill Properties, Inc.
1,1i/Cce
n€:r-
ATTEST:
City of San Jacinto.
Francis Boykin, Mayor
Deputy City Clerk
HBURNSAGR 2
Ciry Manager's Office
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
November 21, 1991
HOWARD BURNS
WINDMILL PROPERTIES
40001 AVENIDA PALIZADA
MURRIETA, CA. 92362
SUBJECT: T-24594
We are transmitting the following:
Agreement for street wwidening, curbs, gutter, sidewalks, paving
and other Public Improvements.
Remarks:
Please return agreement signed (notarized). After receipt, we
will take your agreement to City Council to be approved, thanks.
c42-041,L)..6v/i12)
BRIAN MC NABS
Director of Community Development
utyolSarilacmfo • 201 East Main Street • San jacin oi California 92583
714 054-7337 • FAX 714/054-3728
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DAIE: December 12, 1991
SUBJ: CURB, GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK AGREEMENT
IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
1543 N. Ramona Blvd.
APN 431-040-010
The Ramona Kennel was approved to replace the building for the kennel operation, and to
construct an addition and remodel of the existing house.
The City has ordinances requiring right of way dedications and the installation of street
improvements when substantial on site improvements are to be made. The property owners
requested if to delay the installation of the improvements as there are no completed street
improvements adjacent to their property. They have also stated that it would place a
financial burden on them to do the improvements at this time.
The City has in the past secured an agreement from the property owner for the above
requirements when it is determined by Staff that it would be unreasonable to install the
street improvements and dedicate the right of way.
Attached are the signed irrevocable offer to dedicate and agreement to install the required
public improvements for your consideration.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council grant the property owners their request allowing curbs,
gutters, and sidewalk to be installed at some later date to be determined by the "City" and
the irrevocable offer to dedicate agreements.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Gty of San Jacinto
P. O. Box 488
San Jacinto, CA 92383
s, Gu Sid
AGRE
• •: :
1
NT
Paving & Other Public Improvements)
S AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of 199 , by
nTi
and between JOHN B. MAC F • • 11 AND SHARON W. MAC F , husband a
wife, and EVELYN B. 1 OX a widow, all as Joint Tenants, hereinafter referred to as First
Parties, and the CITY OF SAN JA 1 California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter
referred to as CTTY.
1
• •
•
SS
First Parties are the present owners of the hereinafter described real property, and;
Ordinances of said
and the curbs, gutters, sid
requires the extension of the public sewer and water mains,
, and pa to be installed by the property owner, and;
the present owners do not desire at this time to install curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and
paving and connect to sewers, and extend the water main, and;
. ,
• , the CITY does presently find that the installation of the required improvements cited
above at this time would be impractical and said CITY is willing to waive the requirements of said
improvements at this time, but said CITY will require said installations to be made by the said
property owners or their successors or assiui at some future date as may be determined by the
CTTY.
NOW,
FO
it is hereby
eed by and between the parties hereto as follows:
1. That the installation of the improvements, including the installation of curbs, gutters,
drive approaches, sidewalks, paving and other street improvements and the extension of
sewer and water mains as may be required by said CTTY, be deferred for such a period of
time as may be determined by the upon the following terms and conditions.
2. That when said CITY deems that the installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, installation
of standard roadway between the lip of the new gutter and edge of existing pavement, or the
centerline of the street, and other public improvements, including but not limited to sewer
and water mains, are necessary, the CITY shall give written notice to the owners of said real
property to make said improvements, or pay their fair share of the improvements within
ninety (90) days from the date of the written notice given to the property owners requiring
that said installations or payment be made.
3. That in the event that the said property owners fail or refuse to make the required public
and/or private improvements or pay the required cost of improvements within the time
-1-
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
City of San Aciduo
P. O. Box 488
San Jacinto, CA 92383
VOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE
CO NOW, the undersiLn ed who hereby certified that it is the legal owner of or is party having an
interest in the real property located in the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, County of Riverside, State of
California, described as follows:
1
The northeasterly 4.00 feet of the southwesterly 44.00 feet of Farm Lot 20 of the Lands of the
San Jacinto Land Association as shown by Map on file in Book 8 of Maps, Page 357, Records
of San Diego County, California.
EXCE' G therefrom that portion lying southeasterly of the northwesterly line of the San
Diego Aqueduct as set forth in final judgement and Decree of condemnation, a certified copy
which was filed for record November 4, 1949 as instrument No. 508, official Records of
Riverside County, California.
For the purpose of this description, the center line of Ramona Boulevard was taken as the
southwesterly line of said Farm Lot 20.
WE, for ourselves, our heirs, successors, and assigns, do hereby designate, and set aside for future
street purposes, and irrevocable offer to dedicate to the City of San Jacinto, for public street purposes,
the above described real property which said real property is depicted on a plat map appearing on the
reverse hereof.
At such time as the legislative body of the City of San Jacinto shall take action to accept this
instrument, the same shall be recorded and shall be and constitute an irrevocable offer to dedicate the
above described real property for public street purposes, and said offer may not be revoked by the
undersigned, their heirs, successors, or assigns. The undersigned hereby reserves to itself, its heirs,
successors, and assigns, any and all uses of said land except such uses as the erection or construction
of a building or a structure thereon, or such other uses as would materially affect the ordinance
requirements, of the City of San jacinto respecting set -back requirements, parking requirements,
landscaping requirements, etc. until such time as the legislative body of the City of San Jacinto shall,
without further action on our part, or the part of our heirs, successors, or assigns accept the same for
public street purposes of the City of San Jacinto, whereupon the area designated and set aside for
future street purposes shall thereby become a part of the public street system of the City of San
Jacinto.
JOHN B. MAC FARLAND
me/ /
EVEL N B. WILCOX
SHARON W MAC F (Sivatures must be notarized)
allotted, the CITY shall have the option of bringing such legal action as the law may afford
to enforce the installation of said public improvements or the CITY at its sole option may
make said improvements and may either enforce the collection of said costs of said public
improvements by such legal actions, together with reasonable attorney's fees and costs, or
may cause said costs of said improvements to be made a lien against the real property as
herein described. City also reserves the right to revert the parcel map to acreage with any
and all associated costs placed as a lien on the property.
4. That the real property referred to herein is all that real property located in the CITY OF
SAN JACINTO, CO OF ' RSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, and more
particularly described as:
The Southwest 300 feet of Farm Lot 20 of Lands of San Jacinto I and Association as
shown by Map on file in k 8 page 357 of Maps, Records of San Diego County,
California, lying Northwest of the Northwesterly line of the San Diego Aqueduct as
set out in final judi.i ents and Decree in Condemnation, a certified copy which was
filed for record November 4, 1949 as instrument No. 508.
5. It is understood and agreed by the parties that this agreement shall be recorded with the
County of Riverside, and shall be binding upon the heirs, transferees, successors and assigns
of the parties hereto. Time is declared the essence of this agreement and this contract shall
be deemed to have been executed and to be performed in the County of Riverside, State of
California.
IN SS 1 REOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day and year
first written above.
/,,--
EVELYN B. WILCOX
(Signatures must be notarized)
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
FRANCIS BOYKIN, Mayor
- 2 -
Deputy City Clerk
17 -
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Council
FROM: John Townsel
DATE: December 17, 1991
SUBJECT: Final Acceptance and Notice of Completion
for Downtown Waterlines
Reconation:
Accept the downtown waterlines as constructed by B & Sons Construction and authorize the
City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion.
The Downtown Waterline project was funded by $192,382.00 of Federal Community Block
Grant funds and supplemented by $19,800 of City Water funds. B & Sons has notified the
City that they want an additional $85,564.90 for extra work tickets.
Bac ound and Anal s s:
On July 19, 1990, the City entered into contract with B & Sons Construction, Inc. of Oxnard,
for the construction of the Downtown Waterline. The project was funded with 13th, 14th
and 15th year Federal Community Block Grant (CDBG) funds.
During the course of construction, B & Sons had difficulties complying with CDBG
requirements and payments to sub -contractors. At this time the project is complete, but
there are numerous Stop Notices filed against B & Sons by sub -contractors.
By filing a Notice of Completion, the City will initiate a 30-day period in which any sub-
contractor can file a Stop Notice against B & Sons. After that period, no additional Stop
Notices can be filed. During the 30 day period the City will attempt to negotiate the final
contract amount owed to B & Sons. If negotiations are successful, and the Contractor can
resolve the Stop Notices, final payment can be made.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DAI December 12, 1991
SUBJECT: CITY HALL FOR THE 1990'S
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Attached for your review are the two proposals for the City Hall for the 1990's. Staff and
the Civic Center Committee have reviewed the two proposals for the City Hall of the 1990's
and recommend that the City Council authorize Staff to begin negotiations with Peacock
Radaker for the eventual construction of the facility. Additionally, Staff recommends the
Council authorize Staff to negotiate with Rancon in the event the negotiations with Peacock
Radaker not be successful.
Prepared by Approved by
Timothy M. Hu ts BRIAN MC NABB
Senior Planner Director of Community Development
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Landfill Dump Fee and AB 939
DATE: December 3, 1991 Study Session
RECO 'ATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the resolution
increasing the landfill dump fee and recover the costs of AB 939
compliance.
BACKGROUND
On November 27, 1991 the Riverside County Board of Supervisors
adopted resolution 91-566 increasing the landfill dump fee at
Riverside County Sanitary Landfills from $23.00 per ton to $31.50
per ton. This equates to about a 37% increase and an adjustment of
approximately $1.18 per month to the average homeowner. The County
resolution becomes effective January 1, 1991.
O.K. Associates, Inc. is requesting approval from Council to pass
the County's increase of landfill dump fees, to the consumer. This
request is in accordance with the terms and conditions of the
agreement.
In discussing the matter with Alan Oganesian from O.K. Assoc., the
following was stated, "The residential average tonnage picked up in
the City of San Jacinto is 550.01 tons". This averages to 1.58
tons per year per household. The County's average is 1.66 tons per
year. The County's increase in landfill dump fees and our average
tonnage picked up equals an $8.50 increase per ton to our
customers. Taking this formula we then calculated the residential
and commercial landfill dump fee increase.
RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL
Increase per ton $ 8.50 $ 8.50
Average ton picked up 550.01 594.93
Total increase cost $ 4,675.08 $ 5,056.90
Residential accts. : 4,146 8,970.64/cubic yards
Monthly increase for $
Landfill dump fees
1.12 .56
Page 2
Landfill and AB 939
Taking the County's actual increase of 37% and applying it to our
current landfill dump fees, this would calculate to a monthly
increase of $1.18 for residential and $.67 for commercial.
Therefore, the tonnage calculation is more accurate and favors the
customers.
Secondly, in keeping with AB 939 requirements the City of San
Jacinto contracted with Kleinfelder & Associates to advise and
develop a program to comply with these requirements. The AB 939
study cost is $42,000, this does not include staff time. A fee has
been calculated to recover related expenses due to AB 939. The
information given to staff by our trash hauler, O.K. & Assoc. was
used to calculated the fee.
It is estimated that this calendar year, 6353.16 tons of rubbish
will be picked up from residential units and 8970.64 cubic yards
from commercial. This equals to 42% residential and 58% commercial
rubbish being generated. Taking these percentages and multiplying
them by the $42,000 cost of the AB 939 study, over a one year
period, would cost $.35 per residential units per month and $.23
per cubic yard for commercial.
SUMMARY
This item was discussed at the December 3, 1991 study session. It
was requested it be brought before the City Council for action.
The resolution has been prepared by the City Attorney and is before
you for review and approval.
The City's resolution merely passes through the County resolution
no. 91-566 increasing the landfill dump fees. The City's
resolution would increase the landfill dump fee, $1.12 for
residential units and $.56 cents per cubic yard for commercial
accounts.
Secondly, the purpose of the AB 939 increase of $.35 for
residential and $.23 for commercial, is to offset the cost of
compliance, including planning and program coordination. The first
stages would involve preparation of the report and staff time to
review the report. Subsequent stages would involve the
implementation of recycling and staff coordination as required by
an element.
We currently bill our customers in arrears, therefore, these
increases will become effective January 1, 1992 and will be billed
February 1, 1992. During the month of January staff will properly
notice the citizens of the proposed increases.
RESOLUTION NO:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AND ADJUSTING RATES FOR
THE COLLECTION OF GARBAGE AND RUBBISH COLLECTED
WITHIN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RECITALS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 49300,
the teiius and conditions for the collection of refuse is a matter
of local concern and is subject to such proscriptions as may be
made by the City Council, and
WHEREAS, by Resolution 91-566, dated October 29, 1991,
the Board of Supervisors did increase the tipping fee at County
landfills from $23.00 per ton to $31.50 per ton, effective January
1, 1992. Said increase will result in an increase of $1.12 per
month for residential service and $.56 per cubic yard per month for
commercial service, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the City's franchise contract with
O.K. & Associates, any County landfill charge increases shall be
passed through to the user, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to AB 939 (Public Resources Code
Sections 41000, et. seq.) the City was required to prepare and
submit a source reduction and recycling element. In furtherance of
such requirement, the City was required to and did retain as City's
consultant, KLEINFELDER, INC., and has and will expend the sum of
$42,000.00 for such consulting services. In order to re -coup the
sum paid for such consulting services, over a period of one year,
an additional charge to existing service must be assessed in the
sum of $.35 per month for residential service, and $.23 per cubic
yard per month for commercial service.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: This resolution supersedes Resolution No.
1976, adopted the 2nd day of July, 1991.
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1992
SECTION 2: Residential refuse collection service shall
be increased by the sum of $1.12 per month per residential unit.
Commercial and bin service rates shall be increased by the sum of
$.56 per cubic yard per month. The increases stated in this
section shall not be included for the computation of City's
franchise fee payable from the franchisee/hauler. Actual total
rates inclusive of all charges shall be as shown on the attached
Exhibit "A".
SECTION 3: Effective January 1, 1992 and ending December
31, 1992, residential and commercial refuse collection shall be
further increased by the sum of $.35 per month for residential
service and $.23 per cubic yard per month for commercial/bin
service. The increase shown in this section shall be payable to
the City of San Jacinto for costs incurred for consultation
services in the implementation of AB 939. No charge shall be made
thereon for franchise fees payable to City from franchisee/hauler.
SECTION 4: Mobilehome parks having refuse picked up at
each space but for which fees are billed to and paid by the
operator shall be charged on the same basis as other single family
residential service.
Other mobilehome parks shall be charged the commercial
rate if refuse is collected at central locations, or the
residential rates for individual collection with individual billing
as for other single family residential service.
SECTION 5: The City Council may provide that rubbish not
included within the definition of either "garbage" or "waste", as
provided in Section 13.68.010 of the Municipal Code be collected by
the City for such charge the City Manager or other officer of the
contracting party so authorized by the City Council may determine
to be fair and proper in each individual case.
SECTION 6: This rate resolution shall become effective
for the trash and refuse billing, effective January 1, 1992.
SECTION 7: The City Council does so resolve pursuant to
the authority vested in it by the provisions of Section 13.68.140
of the San Jacinto Municipal Code.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of December, 1991.
ATTEST:
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
Deputy
Francis R. Boykin, Mayor
-2-
EXHIBIT "A"
RESOLUTION NO.
Old Rate Tipping AB 939 Total/Month
Increase
Residential Rate 9.75 1.12 .35 $11.22
(twice per week
service)
Multi -Residential
(twice per week
service)
1st Unit 9.75 1.12 .35 $11.22
Additional Units
(whether or not
occupied)
Bin Service
(once per week
service)
1-1/2 yard
3 yard
4 yard
9.19
43.03
64.59
85.47
1.12
4.85
7.28
9.70
.35 $10.66
1.99
2.99
3.98
(Charges for Bin service for two or more services per week
shall be billed in corresponding multiples of the once per
week charge.)
Commercial Barrel 10.85
1.12
$49.87
$74.86
$99.15
.35 $12.32
Extra dump charges shall be charged $30.00 for all size
containers plus $3.15 tipping fee.
EXHIBIT "A"