HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 7/2/1991AGENDA
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
DATE:
TIME:
WHERE:
July 2, 1991
7:30 p.
Community Center
625 South Pico
San Jacinto, California
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
Roll Call
Moment of Silence for Reflection
Pledge of Allegiance
2.0 CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be
routine and will be enacted by one motion by the City Council in
the form listed.
There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the
motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public
requests specified items to be removed and/or discussed.
Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come
forward, upon invitation of the Mayor, state their name, address
and the Consent Calendar item number.
2.1. Approve Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 1991.
2.2 Approve Warrant Nos. 25408 through 25530, in the amount
of $281,817.09, as submitted by the Finance Director.
2.3 Adopt Resolution No. L) certifying results of election
for CFD #3, Annex. #2 and authorize the recording of the
Notice of Special Tax Lien.
2.4 Ordinance for Adoption - Ordinance No. 936 An Ordinance
of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto,
California, committing to mobile source air pollution
reduction. (Staff recommends approval of introduction
to second reading.)
July 2, 1991
Agenda - Page 2
2.5 Ordinance for Adoption - Ordinance No. 937 An Ordinance
of the City of San Jacinto, amending Chapter 8.20 of
Title 8 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code relating to
Alarm Systems. (City Attorney recommends approval.)
2.6 Adopt Resolution No.\-CkVA establishing an employee health
and safety policy statement and adopting the City's
Injury and Illness Prevention Program.
Tentative Tract Map #21943 Request for Third and Final
Extension (Applicant Par-Mat Partnership) Location:
Village I - Soboba Springs Specific Plan.
2.8 Final Tract Map 26020-2 (Applicant Old Mountain
Associates) Location: Between Evans and Shafer, east of
Las Rosas.
//
2.9 Adopt Resolution No. \n , of intention to order
abandonment of an alley located between Seventh Street
and Santo Drive and setting a public hearing for August
6, 1991 at 7:30 p.m.
2.10 Acquisition of Flood Control Right-of-way from Premiere
Homes in the amount of $55,000.00.
2.11 Ratify Council consensus of special audits, to include
Hughes Heiss, in an amount not to exceed $500.00 of which
funds are available under special audits.
3.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
4.0 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
4.1 Valley Restart Task Force - Ken Shaw, Executive Director
5.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS
5.1 Approve Measure "A" - Local Streets and Road Program for
Fiscal Year 1991-1996 and authorize the City Manager to
forward to the Riverside County Transportation
Commission.
5.2 Adopt Resolution No. k approving Cost of Living
increase for refuse collection.
July 2, 1991
Agenda - Page 3
6.0 MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
6.1 Councilmember request for information on investments.
6.2 Possible City Council/School Board Meeting.
6.3 Continued discussion of Fiscal Year 1991/1992 Budget if
deemed appropriate.
7.0 EXECUTIVE SESSION
8.0 ADJOURNMENT
Next regular City Council meeting July l 1991
I, Maurice Armster, do hereby certify that I caused to be posted
the foregoing agenda this 28th day of June, 1991, as required by
law.
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
Deputy
MINUTES
San Jacinto City Council
and the Council Sitting as
the Redevelopment Agency
and Industrial Development Authority
Regular Adjourned Meeting
June 18, 1991
The regular meeting of the San Jacinto City Council, the Council
sitting as the Redevelopment Agency and Industrial Development
Authority was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Boykin at the
Community Center, 625 S. Pico Avenue.
Roll Call - Present: Councilmen Boykin, Ford and Hafliger.
Councilwoman Leahy was absent (excused).
Staff Members: City Manager Easter, Community Development
Director McNabb, Finance Director Vega, City Attorney Cox,
Police Chief Kozma, and Fire Chief Chadwick.
MOMENT OF SILENCE FOR REFLECTION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
I. CITY CLERK
A. Oath of Office
James C. Richards, Sr., sworn in as Councilman by
City Clerk, Maurice Armster. At this time, Mr.
Richards took his Council seat.
CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of Minutes of June 4, 10, and 11, 1991.
B. Approval of Warrant Nos. 25289 through 25407, in the
amount of $217,097.49, as submitted by the Finance
Director.
C. Ordinance for Adoption - Ordinance No. 935
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California, amending Ordinance 340, the
Zoning Ordinance, related to parking regulations for
single-family development. (Staff recommends
approval.)
June 18, 1991 Minutes
Page 2
D. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1965
A Resolution of the City of San Jacinto, California
of intention to order abandonment of a portion of
Eleventh Street between Santa Fe Avenue and the
Buena Vista Retention Basin. (Staff recommends
approval.)
E. Recommendation of Lifting of Hiring Freeze.
(Finance Director recommends approval.)
F. Claim of Janine 0. Cifuentes for damages in the
amount of $615.69. (City Attorney recommends
denial.)
G. Claim of Barbara Cox for damages in the amount of
$54.40. (City Attorney recommends approval.)
H. Claim of Michael George Palmer for damages in the
amount of $30,000. (City Attorney recommends
denial.)
I. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1966
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California, accepting the weed abatement
contractor bid from the City of Hemet, awarded to
Gene Rheingan. (Staff recommends approval.)
J. Notification from City Clerk Maurice Armster of
deputizing Jolene Shaw to serve as Deputy City
Clerk. (Receive and file).
K. Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 936
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California, committing to mobile source air
pollution reduction. (Staff recommends approval of
introduction to second reading.)
L. Acceptance of Agreement from Jamie and Dawne
Tiscareno for curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paving and
other public improvements on Parcel Map 26034.
(Staff recommends approval.)
2
June 18, 1991 Minutes
Page 3
CONSENT CALENDAR (cont'd)
Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1964
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California, initiating proceedings for the
annexation of certain territory generally located
south of Washington Avenue, west of Windham Street,
east of Hewitt Street and north of Park Avenue in
the San Jacinto area (Annexation No. 68). (Staff
recommends approval)
N. Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 937
An Ordinance of the City of San Jacinto, amending
Chapter 8.20 of Title 8 of the San Jacinto Municipal
Code relating to Alarm Systems. (City Attorney
recommends approval.)
0. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1960
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto establishing fees for alarm systems pursuant
to Chapter 8.20 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code
(Ord. No. 937). (City Attorney recommends
approval.)
P. Release of Paving, Sewer and Water Bonds
Applicant: Barratt American Incorporated
Location: Tract 23793
Staff recommends reduction as follows:
Water bond from $188,881.25 reduced to $28,332.19
Sewer bond from $196,459.50 reduced to $29,468.93
Paving bond from $814,274.67 reduced to $122,141.21
Q. Release of Paving, Sewer and Water Bonds
Applicant: San Jacinto Partners II
Location: Tract 23166
Staff recommends reduction as follows:
Water bond from $54,230.00 reduced to $8,134.50
Sewer bond from $89,465.00 reduced to $13,419.75
Paving bond from $146,265.00 reduced to $73,132.50
R. Authorization to submit an application to California
Statewide Communities Development for Recreational
Feasibility Study. (Staff recommends approval.)
S. Chamber of Commerce Request for Waiver of Fees for
carnival to be held July 11-14, 1991 at the corner
of Esplanade and San Jacinto Avenues. (Staff
recommends approval.)
3
June 18, 1991 Minutes
Page 4
CONSENT CALENDAR (cont'd)
T. SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY - Approval of Job
and Salary Range Classification for Deputy City
Clerk position. (Report to be distributed Monday).
U. Award of Soils Engineering Contract - Esplanade
Project. Staff recommends a contract be awarded to
Inland Foundation Engineering in the amount of $5000
to select the ideal pavement design. Staff
additionally recommends that Inland be hired to
perform compaction testing per their normal fee
schedule.
V. Final Tract Map 24738-1 and 24738-2
Applicant: Forecast Corporation
Location: Between Cottonwood and Seventh and Kirby
Streets (Staff recommends approval.)
W. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda_pursuant
to City Attorney.
Councilman Ford questioned (Item II-I) if the
contractor, Gene Rheingan, would have enough
equipment to take care of both the City of Hemet and
San Jacinto's weed abatement programs. Fire Chief
Chadwick stated that Mr. Rheingan was prepared to
handle both cities. Councilman Richards inquired
if it would be possible next year to bid with Hemet
in hopes of a price break. Chief Chadwick stated
that Hemet had also expressed an interest in a joint
effort and they would look at this again when
bidding next year's program.
Councilman Richards inquired (Item II-K) how much
the City would receive from this assessment and how
would it be used. Finance Director Vega advised
that the City woula receive $.40 per $1.00 and that
the funds must be used to reduce air pollutants.
Councilman Richards requested that an additional
statement be added to Item II-U, stating that the
5000 should be a not to exceed price.
Motion by Mayor Boykin to approve consent calendar items A through
W, with inclusion of statement in Soils Engineering (Item II-U)
adopt Resolution Nos. 1964, 1965, 1966, and Ordinance No. 935 and
introduce Ordinance No. 936 to second reading and waive the reading
4
in full.
June 18, 1991 Minutes
Page 5
CONSENT CALENDAR (contud)
Seconded by Councilman Hafliger.
Motion carried: 4-0.
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Tract Map of Specific Plan 2-88 (continued from 4-
2, 4-16, 5-21 and 6-4-91)
Applicant: PR Equities
Location: Tentative Tracts 24050, 24051, 24052,
24053, 24054, 24055, 24056, 24057, 26426, and 26427.
Proposal for 10 Subdivisions within Specific Plan
2-88.
Presentation by Brian McNabb, Community Development
Director. Mr. McNabb presented the amended
conditions (included as Item No. 3 under
Environmental Conditions for each map to pay all
school fees and participate as required by City in
an assessment district to finance school
facilities). Mr. McNabb additionally advised that
fire mitigation fee credits would be brought back
to Council at a later date.
Mayor Boykin opened the Public Hearing. The City
Clerk's Office stated that affidavit of publication
for the public hearing was on file in the City
Clerk's Office and that no written or verbal
comments have been received.
Dave Cottington, applicant, spoke to Council
advising he was aware of the impact on the schools
that development brings and that Peacock Radaker had
been in numerous meetings with the School District
discussing this issue. Mr. Cottington referred to
the Specific Plan, allowing for school fees, that
was approved by the City Council in 1988, based on
square footage of development. Additionally, Mr.
Cottington stated that the Developer's Agreement is
consistent with the Specific Plan, City codes and
City regulations. Mr. Cottington's position on
behalf of Peacock Radaker is that the applicant has
a current development agreement with the City, which
includes school fees. Mr. Cottington additionally
5
June 18, 1991 Minutes
Page 6
PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont'd)
stated that the Peacock Radaker Attorney would have
to approve any agreements the School District might
request. In conclusion, Mr. Cottington requested
the Council's approval as approved in the original
wording of the Specific Plan.
Councilman Hafliger stated that he feels the State
should fund education and it is necessary for the
School District and City, along with the developers
to band together. Councilman Hafliger additionally
stated that he has requested the Mayor bring this
matter to WRCOG.
Councilman Richards asked if the .5 (elementary
students per household) was also used in the 1988
Specific Plan. Mr. McNabb stated that at that time
the only consideration of schools was for one (1)
to be located in the project. City Attorney Cox
stated that language in the Specific Plan allows for
additional fees to be assessed if done City wide.
Bill Marshall, School District Assistant
Superintendent, came before Council stating he was
not here to request Council to deny the project or
change the language, but requesting an assessment
on Phase II (for schools) be developed. Mr.
Marshall advised that there were several ways to
receive the monies need for new school construction
and additional facilities at the higher levels.
They are: enhanced fee, i.e.,($4-$6 per sq. foot),
create a Mello-Roos, receive a grant of land,
establish a Redevelopment Agency and a turnkey
facility turned over to the School District. Mr.
Marshall further advised Council that the only two
times that conditions can be placed on a development
are at zone change and approval of tentative tract
map(s).
As no one else wished to be heard, the Mayor closed
the Public Hearing.
Mayor Boykin asked if the amount of $1.58 was
specifically stated in the Development Agreement and
was Phase I and II mentioned in the Development
Agreement? Mr. McNabb advised that the $1.58 was
not mentioned (at the time of the agreement the
6
amount would have been lesser, and only refers to
June 18, 1991 Minutes
Page 7
PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont'd)
the amount governed by State law) and that both
Phase I and Phase II are included in the Development
Agreement.
Councilman Hafliger asked what the amount of the
school fee would be if Council approves tonight.
Mr. McNabb advised that the limit set by State,
currently in effect, is $1.58 per square foot.
Councilman Hafliger additionally inquired what
additional steps would be needed for formation of
another Mello-Roos. Mr. McNabb answered that a
District would need to be established, a tax rate
calculated, then the development annexed to the
district. Brian further advised that a tract map
must condition the Mello-Roos as the School District
has no power. Councilman Hafliger again stated that
the School District must petition the State for
revenues for school construction.
Councilman Richards stated that the City needs to
refer to the original agreement the City made with
the developer as it is a moral commitment.
Motion by Councilman Richards to approve Tentative Tract Maps
24050, 24051, 24052, 24053, 24054, 24055, 24056, 24057, 26426 and
26427 of Specific Plan 2-88, with Condition No. 3 of the
Environmental Conditions amended to read, pay all school fees 4s
required by State law all subject to findings, conditions, Negative
Declaration.
Seconded by Councilman Hafliger.
Motion carried: 3-0 (Councilman Ford abstained.)
Councilman Ford stated that the School District, the
City and developers must continue to work together.
B. Intent to Annex Territory
Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1967
Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California, ordering certain changes and
modifications relating to the annexation of
territory to an existing Community Facilities
District.
7
June 18, 1991 Minutes
Page 8
PUBLIC HEARINGS (contld)
Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1968
Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California, declaring the annexation of
territory to an existing Community Facilities
District and authorizing submittal of levy of
special taxes to the qualified electors.
Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1969
Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California, submitting to the qualified
electors in an annexed area of a Community
Facilities District a proposition to levy a special
tax and establishing procedures and conditions for
conducting an election.
Mayor Boykin announced that this is the time and
place for the public hearings relating to the
Community Facilities District No. 3, Annexation No.
2. The public hearing relates to the annexation of
territory to an existing Community Facilities
District and the authorization to levy a special
tax.
Deputy City Clerk Randolph stated that the notice
of the public hearing has been given as authorized
by law, with publication of Notice of Intention to
Annex Property and mailing of Notice of Public
Hearing.
Community Development Director McNabb gave a
presentation on the annexation, including boundaries
of the existing Community Facilities District,
extent of territory proposed to be annexed and
advised that the rate of the tax was set as $96.40
in 1989-90 with an additional amount of the CPI
increase annually added to the $96.40 base. The
assessment covers the impacts of new development in
the area of public safety services.
Mayor Boykin opened the Public Hearing and stated
that each person wishing to speak must give his/her
name, address and state whether they are a property
owner or a registered voter. The Mayor first
requested the protestors of the annexation to speak.
As there were none, he then requested those in favor
of the annexation to speak. The Clerk stated that
8
no written or verbal comments have been received in
June 18, 1991 Minutes
Page 9
PUBLIC HEARING (contld)
opposition of the annexation. As no one wished to
be heard, the Mayor then closed the Public Hearing.
Motion by Councilman Hafliger to adopt Resolution Nos. 1967, 1968
and 1969 and waive the readings in full.
Seconded by Councilman Richards.
Motion carried: 3-1 (Mayor Boykin voting no)
IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
A. Robert E. Carrillo, 762 Verona - Development of
Soboba Springs and watering of the greenbelt and
maintenance, Mello-Roos expenditures.
Mr. Carrillo requested answers to a number of
questions concerning the Soboba Springs Development.
A number of people in the audience rose, signifying
they were also residents of Soboba Springs. His
first question was why has the City not sold bonds
under the CFD and what has happened to the
completion bonds? Mr. Carrillo also asked about
the unfinished streets and the status and condition
of the green belts as well as requested that the
residents be kept informed.
At this point, Mayor Boykin requested the staff
respond to Mr. Carrillo's concerns. City Manager
Easter referred this to Brian McNabb, Community
Development Director. Mr. McNabb advised that the
bonds have to be supported by taxes paid.
Additionally, the property owner is in foreclosure,
although Village #4 is in escrow. Mr. McNabb
advised that the City does have bonds to furnish the
streets, but Mr. Bigham (individual that is in
escrow on Village #4) has requested this be held off
until his development is completed. Mr. McNabb
stated that the green belt in the Village can be put
in the LLMD upon completion and approval by the
City. Mr. McNabb advised that he was unaware of any
uncompleted housing units in the area and would
refer this to the building official, Ross Chadwick.
In conclusion, Mr. McNabb stated that a newsletter
could be completed by Staff and distributed to all
residents.
5
June 18, 1991 Minutes
Page 10
Mr. Charles DeRose, 820 Verona, came before Council
and questioned what does the approval of the final
tract map entitle the developer to? Mr. McNabb
advised that this allows the developer to create
buildable lots (allow building permits to be
obtained).
Mr. Ken Brass, 828 Verona, relayed that he was a 15
month resident and had high expectations for the
development when he purchased his home. He
questioned the $4,350 fee to establish the LLMD.
Mr. McNabb stated that the LLMD is scheduled for the
entry and Soboba Road. Mr. Brass additionally
questioned how long would it take to collect on the
surety bond to allow for street completion. Mr.
McNabb advised that the City can call in the bonds
at any time if the developer does not complete
improvements.
City Manager Easter advised that the City Attorney
and Staff would review the status of the project
explore possibilities and provide answers at the
July 2 Council meeting.
Gus Rudell, another resident of Soboba expressed his
disbelief with the attitude of the City on the
project.
Mrs Carrillo, 762 Verona, asked where the Mello-
Roos/Community Facilities District monies go? Mr.
McNabb relayed that the District paid for a fire
truck and the continuance of public safety services.
Mr. Brass additionally asked about the status of the
funds. Mr. McNabb advised that the City's auditor
must address the status of these funds with each
annual audit. A copy is available at City Hall for
Fiscal Year 1989-90, with the 1990-91 audit report
available in August or September.
Councilman Hafliger stated that he appreciated the
fact that the people from Soboba had attended the
Council meeting and stayed to address the Council.
Mayor Boykin called a five minute recess at 10:10 p.m.
10
June 18, 1991 Minutes
Page 11
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (contld)
Stephen Rebovich, 975 Clover St, came forward and
addressed his comments directly to Mayor Boykin.
The comments had to do with the construction and
final approval of his home. As Mr. Rebovich
continued loudly only, the Mayor requested the Chief
of Police to escort Mr. Rebovich out of the meeting.
Councilman Hafliger requested the City Attorney look
into a restraining order or something of that nature
to bar Mr. Rebovich from future meetings.
V. CITY DEPARTMENTS
A. Selection of an Interim Economic Development
Coordinator - Pamela S. Easter (Oral Report)
City Manager Easter relayed that, as a result of
Council's direction, an Economic Development
Director would be hired and on board in the next
three-four months, interim, the Council Economic
Development Subcommittee is encouraging that an
Interim Director be hired. Staff recommends that
Ken O'Neil, be retained in that interim capacity.
He would work not more than 20 hours per week at a
rate of $70/hour plus mileage. Redevelopment funds
and planning fees (new structure effective August)
will fund this position.
Councilman Hafliger, member of the Economic
Development Council Committee, spoke in support of
this recommendation.
Motion by Councilman Hafliger to approve hiring of an interim
Economic Development Coordinator, Ken O'Neil, at $70/hour plus
mileage, for not more than 20 hours per week, to be reviewed
monthly.
Seconded by Mayor Boykin.
Motion carried: 4-0.
1 1
June 18, 1991 Minutes
Page 12
CITY DEPARTMENTS (cont'd)
B. Council Retreat Report - Pamela S. Easter
City Manager Easter provided Council with a final
report of the Council Retreat and asked that if
Council approved, the report be received and filed.
Additionally, Ms. Easter requested Council's
interest in a follow-up Retreat later this year.
Council confirmed their interest and Ms. Easter
advised that the Retreat would be held in August or
September.
C. Paramedic Committee - Ross Chadwick
Ross Chadwick requested the item be continued to a
further date as the County was not prepared to
finalize this agreement at this time due to
personnel and budgetary problems.
Motion by Mayor Boykin to continue Paramedic Committee item to
undetermined time.
Seconded by Councilman Ford.
Motion carried: 4-0.
D. 2010 Committee Report - Pamela S. Easter (Oral
Report)
City Manager Easter advised Council that the 2010
Committee held a meeting on June 12, conducted by
Chairman Clayton Record. The next meeting of the
Executive Committee will be held on July 11, 1991
and Mr. Record anticipates a 9-month effort to
formalize plans.
E. Ed Meyerson Request for Water Service - Brian McNabb
Brian McNabb, Community Development Director,
advised Council that the property is in the
unincorporated area. The request is for Lot #10,
no frontage on Alessandro where the City is
currently providing water service to five County
lots. Mr. McNabb advised that, when the City has
previously provided service under similar
conditions, it has met with poor water quality and
12
low pressure.
June 18, 1991 Minutes
Page 13
CITY DEPARTMENTS (cont'd)
Ed Meyerson, 964 Verona, representing the owner of
the property, stated that the owner would endure the
low pressure and poor water quality until a line was
provided directly, at which time he would connect
to this line.
Mr. McNabb advised Council that the current policy
of the City is to provide water only within the City
limits.
Motion by Councilman Ford to allow waterline to be placed on Lot
No. 10, going through adjacent lots, with property owner
permission, and service provided by City of San Jacinto, until such
time as permanent line is installed, when owner will pay fair share
to joint line.
Seconded by Councilman Richards.
Motion failed: 2-2.
F. Naming of new park in Rancho San Jacinto - Brian
McNabb
Councilman Richards stated he felt the park should
be named the Howard Rose P rk as the property was
previously owned by the Fam,ily and was to be
planted in roses. Co,
Mayor Boykin requested that public input be
received.
Motion by Councilman Ford to receive input from the public on the
selection of a name for the Rancho San Jacinto Park.
Seconded by Councilman Hafliger.
Motion carried: 4-0.
13
June 18, 1991 Minutes
Page 14
VI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
A. Changes to Museum By-Laws, Acceptance of Resignation
of Mel Lowe, with regret, and reappointment of
Barbara Lee. Mayor Boykin requested the Council
approve the by-law change of members being able to
serve two-four year terms and approval of
reappointment of Barbara Lee to the Board. The
Mayor stated, it was with regret that he accepted
the resignation of Mel Lowe. Deputy City Clerk
advised that the newspapers had advertised the open
Museum Board seat and several calls of interest had
been received.
Motion by Councilman Hafliger to approve the By-Law change, accept
resignation of Mel Lowe, with regret, and reappointment of Barbara
Lee.
Seconded by Mayor Boykin.
Motion carried: 4-0.
Councilman Richards requested an update on the
status of investment funds and a report on the
deposit of funds within local agencies. City
Manager Easter advised that City Treasurer, Ken
Leahy, would be requested to provide a report to
Council on our current investment activity.
VII. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Pending Litigation, Personnel and Labor
Relations
City Attorney Cox advised that the pending
litigation was on Thomas Poe versus the City of San
Jacinto.
Motion by Councilman Ford to enter into an Executive Session for
discussion of pending litigation, personnel and labor relations at
11:25 a.m.
Seconded by Councilman Hafliger.
Motion carried: 4-0
14
June 18, 1991 Minutes
Page 15
Motion by Councilman Ford to return to Regular Session at 12:08
a .m.
Seconded by Councilman Richards.
Motion carried: 4-0.
Let the record show that no action was taken as a result of this
Executive Session.
VIII .ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Councilman Hafliger to adjourn to June 25, 1991 at 6:30
p.m.
Seconded by Councilman Ford.
Motion carried: 4-0.
Respectfully submitted,
Nancy Randolph
Deputy City Clerk
15
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Anna
Warrants
July 2, 1991
Finance Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
via City Manager
A computer problem was encounted Friday while attempting to
print check and check register documents for Council approval.
This will be rectified on Monday and check register will be
delivered to City Councilmembers' homes.
MEMORANDUM AGENDA
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
July 2, 1991
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
Community Facilities District No. 3
Annexation No. 2
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution No.
declaring the results of the election and authorize the City Clerk
to record the Notice of Special Tax Lien.
BACKGROUND: Following the conduct of a public hearing by
the Council on this matter on June 18, 1991, an election was
conducted and was approved by the requisite electorate. This
action will complete the processing of the above referenced matter
and put into place the necessary collection mechanism for approved
assessments.
1
RESOLUTION No.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A "MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY
FACILITIES ACT OF 1982" SPECIAL TAX AND BOND AUTHORIZATION
ELECTION
THIS RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED WITH REFERENCE TO THE FOLLOWING
FACTS:
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of
the local Agency"), has previously declared its intention and
held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of
territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant
to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facili-
ties Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title
5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifi-
cally Article 3.5 thereof. The existing Community Facilities
District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 3 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and,
WHEREAS, the area proposed to be annexed is known and desig-
nated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3, ANNEXATION NO. 2
(hereinafter referred to as the "annexed territory"); and,
WHEREAS, said legislative body did call for and order to be
held an election to submit to the qualified voters of the
annexed territory a proposition to levy a special tax in the
annexed territory; and,
WHEREAS, at this time said election has been held and the
measure voted upon did receive the favorable 2/3's vote of the
qualified voters, and this legislative body does desire to
declare the favorable results of the election in accordance with
the authorization of Section 22932 of the Elections Code of the
State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of San Jacinto, in regular session, this 2nd day of July,
1991, as follows:
That the above recitals are all true and correct.
22 2. That this legislative body hereby receives and approves the
CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES
23
CAST, as submitted by the City Clerk, said Statement setting
forth the number of votes cast in the election, the measure
24 voted upon, and the number of votes given for and/or against
the measure voted upon. A copy of said Certificate and
25 Statement is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", referenced
and so incorporated.
26
3. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to enter in the
minutes of this meeting the results of the election and the
STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST.
4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
30
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED AT A REGULAR MEETING OF SAID CITY
31 COUNCIL duly held the 2nd day of July, 1991.
32 ATTEST:
Mayor
Deputy City Clerk
3
5
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
27
28
29
CE RTIFI CAT E
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of a Resolution
duly adopted by said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on
the date therein Bet forth.
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
2 2
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
32
WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
P. O. BOX 488
SAN JACINTO, CA 92383
NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 3114.5 of the Streets and Highways Code and
Section 53328.3 of the Government Code, the undersigned CITY CLERK of the
legislative body of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3,
ANNEXATION NO. 2, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, HEREBY GIVES NOTICE that a lien is hereby
imposed to secure payment of a special tax which the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of California, is authorized to annually levy
for the following purpose:
Providing for certain services generally described as additional
police and fire services necessary and required to meet
increased demands within the boundaries of the District.
The special tax is authorized to be levied within Community Facilities District No.
3, Annexation No. 2, which has now been officially formed, and the lien of the
special tax is a continuing lien which shall secure each annual levy of the special
tax and which shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is
prepaid, permanently satisfied and cancelled in accordance with law or until the
special tax ceases to be levied and a notice of cessation of special tax is recorded
in accordance with Section 53330.5 of the Government Code.
The rate and method of apportionment of the authorized special tax is as shown on
the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A", and the special tax shall be
collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected and
shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure, sale and lien
priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem taxes. Conditions
under which the obligation to pay the special tax may be prepaid and permanently
satisfied and the lien of the special tax cancelled are as follows:
Any special tax may be prepaid and satisfied by the payment of
the maximum present value of the special tax obligation.
Notice is further given that upon the recording of this notice in the Office of the
County Recorder, the obligation to pay the special tax levy shall become a lien upon
all non-exempt real property within the District in accordance with Section 3115.5
of the Streets and Highways Code.
The names of the owner(s) of the real property included within the Community
Facilities District as they appear on the last secured assessment roll as of the
date of recording of this Notice and the Assessor's tax parcel(s) numbers of all
parcels or any portion thereof which are included within said territory to be
annexed to this Community Facilities District are as set forth on the attached,
referenced and incorporated Exhibit "B".
Reference is made to the boundary maps of the original Community Facilities District
and Annexation No. 2 thereto recorded at Book , Page , Document No.
and at Book , Page , Document No. , respec-
tively, of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts in the Office of
the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California, which maps are
now the final boundary maps of the Community Facilities District.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3
ANNEXATION NO. 2
EXHIBIT' "A"
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX
The Resolution of Intention refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate
and apportionment of the special tax so as to allow each landowner or resident
within the proposed district to estimate the maximum annual amount that would be
required for payment. For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment,
see the following:
PROPERTY CATEGORIES AND MAXIMUM ANNUAL TAX
Taxable property categories and initial maximum annual taxes are as follows:
PROPERTY CATEGORY
MAXIMUM ANNUAL TAX
(FISCAL YEAR 1989-90)
I. RESIDENTIAL UNIT $96.40 per dwelling unit
II. COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
$0.05 per, square foot per
year for developed area
RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL taxes shall be levied on all property upon
the issuance of a building permit in the fiscal year next following the issuance of
the building permit.
ESCALATION OF TAX
The above authorized taxes for are for fiscal year 1989-90, and are subject to
annual increases to reflect increases in the Consumer Price Index.
TERM
The Final Land Use Residential Tax shall be levied as long as necessary to pay for
additional services.
DEFINITIONS
The "Consumer Price Index" shall be the Los Angeles/Riverside Area - All Urban
Consumer Price Index, published by the United states Bureau of Labor Statistics, as
said data is available June 30th of each fiscal year.
"Developed Area" shall be that portion of the land to be developed as measured from
outside walls, excluding garage, covered ways and overhangs, patios and additions.
"Dwelling Unit" shall mean any building and any mobilehome which is not immediately
transportable or any portion thereof which contains living facilities, including
provisions for sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation.
"Fiscal Year" shall be July 1 through June 30 of any year.
For all particulars relating to implementation, further interpretation, definitions,
and all other particulars related to the method and apportionment of the tax,
reference is made to the "Report" as previously approved by this legislative body.
For further information concerning the current and estimated future tax liability of
owners or purchasers of real property subject to this special tax lien, interested
persons should contact the following designated person:
BRIAN McNABB, DIRECTOR
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
P. O. BOX 488
SAN JACINTO, CA 92383
TELEPHONE: (714) 654-7337
DATED:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE NO. 936
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, COMMITTING TO MOBILE SOURCE
AIR POLLUTION REDUCTION
The City Council of the City of San Jacinto, does hereby ordain
as follows:
A. Findings. The City of San Jacinto hereby finds and declares
that
(1) Whereas, the City is committed to improving the public
health, safety and welfare, including air quality;
(2) Whereas, mobile sources are a major contributor to air
pollution in the South Coast Air Basin;
(3) Whereas, air quality goals for the region established
by state law cannot be met without reducing air pollution from
mobile sources;
(4) Whereas, the South Coast Air Quality Management Plan
(AQMP) calls upon cities and counties to reduce emissions from
motor vehicles consistent with the requirements of the California
Clean Air Act of 1988 by developing and implementing mobile
source air pollution reduction programs;
14 (5) Whereas, such programs place demands upon the City's
unds, those programs should be financed by shifting the
5 responsibility for financing from the general fund to the motor
vehicles creating the demand, to the greatest extent possible;
2
(7) Whereas, forty cents of every dollar collected under
2211Section 44223 of the Health and Safety Code shall be distributed
o cities and counties located in the South Coast Air Quality
2311 Management District that comply with Section 44243 of the code,
based on the jurisdictions' prorated share of population as
24 defined by the State Department of Finance;
25 (8) Whereas, the City is located within the South Coast
. Air Quality Management District and is eligible to receive a
261 portion of the revenues from the additional motor vehicle
egistration fees contingent upon adoption of this ordinance;
27
(9)Whereas, the prorated share of the fee revenues for
28 cities that fail to adopt an ordinance pursuant to Section 44243
b) (3) of the Health and Safety Code shall be distributed
29 instead to the jurisdictions within the District that have
Hadopted an ordinance;
30
31
32
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
12
13
Ordinance No. 936
Page 3
Section 2. Legal Construction. The prov
i
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
i
s
ordinance shall be construed as necessar
y
t
o
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
c
a
r
r
y
2 out its purposes, which are hereby found
a
n
d
d
e
c
l
a
r
e
d
t
o
b
e
i
n
furtherance of the public health, safety,
w
e
l
f
a
r
e
a
n
d
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
.
Section 3. Severability. Should any sent
e
n
c
e
,
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
,
4 clause, part or provision of this ordinan
c
e
b
e
d
e
c
l
a
r
e
d
b
y
a
court of competent jurisdiction to be inv
a
l
i
d
,
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
s
h
a
l
t
5 not affect the validity of the ordinance
a
s
a
w
h
o
l
e
,
o
r
a
n
y
p
a
r
t
thereof, other than the part declared to
b
e
i
n
v
a
l
i
d
.
6
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect 7 hirty (30) days after adoption.
8 MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED by the City Cou
n
c
i
l
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
of San Jacinto at its regular meeting hel
d
o
n
t
h
e
day 9 of , 1991.
10 AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a t
r
u
e
c
o
p
y
o
f
Ordinance No. 936 duly adopted by the Cit
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
of San Jacinto at a regular meeting there
o
f
h
e
l
d
t
h
e
DAY OF 1991.
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the
C
i
t
y
o
f
S
a
n
J
a
c
i
n
t
o
his day of 1991.
City Clerk
26
27
9 8
29
30
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
73
24
25
3111
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Ordinance No. 936
Page 2
(10) Now, therefore be it resolved that, the City of San
Jacinto, after careful consideration hereby finds and declares
that the imposition of the additional motor vehicle registration
fee by the SCAQMD to finance mobile source air pollution
reduction programs is in the best interest of the city and
promotes the general welfare of its residents;
B. Intent. This ordinance is intended to support the SCAQMD's
imposition of the vehicle registration fee and to bring the City
nto compliance with the requirements set forth in section 44243
of the Health and Safety Code in order to receive fee revenues
or the purpose of implementing programs to reduce air pollution
from motor vehicles.
C. Definitions. As applied in this ordinance, the following
ords and terms shall be defined as follows:
(1) "City" shall mean the City of San Jacinto.
(2) "Mobile source air pollution reduction programs" shall
mean any program or project implemented by the City to reduce
air pollution from motor vehicles which it determines will be
consistent with the California Clean Air Act of 1988 or the plan
proposed pursuant to Article 5 (commencing with Section 40460)
of Chapter 5.5 of Part 3 of the California Health and Safety
Code.
(3) "Fee Administrator" shall mean the Finance Director
he City of San Jacinto or her designee.
. Administration of Vehicle Registration Fee.
(1) Receipt of Fee: The additional vehicle registration
ems disbursed by the SCAQMD and remitted to the City, pursuant
o this ordinance, shall be accepted by the Fee Administrator.
(2) Establishment of Air Quality Improvement Trust Fund: 1
The Fee Administrator shall establish a separate interest-bearing
trust fund account in a financial institution authorized to
receive deposits of City funds.
(3) Transfer of Funds: Upon receipt of vehicle registration 1
fees, the Fee Administrator shall deposit such funds into the
separate account established pursuant to Subsection (2) above.
All interest earned by the Trust Fund Account shall be credited
only to that account.
(4) Expenditure of Air Quality Trust Fund Revenues. All
revenues received from the SCAQMD and deposited in the Trust
7und Account shall be exclusively expended on mobile source
emission reduction programs as defined in Subsection c(2) above.
Such revenues and any interest earned on the revenues shall be
expended within one (1) year of the completion of the programs.
(5) Audits: The City consents to an audit of all programs
and projects funded by vehicle registration fee revenues
received from the SCAQMD pursuant to Section 44223 of the Health
and Safety Code. The audit shall be conducted by an independent
auditor selected by the SCAQMD as provided in Sections 44244
and 44244.1(a) of the Health and Safety Code.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
32
95
ORDINANCE NO. 937
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
AMENDING CHAPTER 8.20 OF TITLE 8 OF THE
SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO ALARM SYSTEMS
The City Council of the City of San Jacinto does hereby
ordain as follows:
Section 1. Chapter 8.20 of Title 8 of the San Jacinto
Municipal Code is hereby amended and restated as follows:
A. Subsections 8 . 20 . 010 through and including
Subsection 8.20.160 are hereby repealed.
B. New Subsections 8.20.010 through and
including Subsection 8.20.100 are added
and amended as follows:
CHAPTER 8.20
ALARM SYSTEM
8.20.010 - Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to set forth regulations
governing burglary and robbery alarm systems, require
permits therefor, establish fees, and provide for
punishment of violation of provisions of this chapter.
8.20.020 - Definitions
For the purpose of this chapter, certain words and
phrases used herein are defined as follows:
A. ALARM AGENT is a person defined as such in the Alarm
Company Act contained in the State of California
Business & Professions Code, Division 3, Chapter
11.6 - Alarm Companies.
B. ALARM COMPANY OPERATOR is a person defined as such
in the Alarm Company Act contained in the State of
California Business & Professions Code, Division 3,
Chapter 11.6 - Alarm Companies.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
26
27
28
C. ALARM SYSTEM means an assembly of equipment and
devices arranged to signal the presence of a
hazardous condition requiring urgent attention to
which police customarily respond, and includes
devices which emit an audible sound in or on the
premises when actuated.
1. COMMERCIAL ALARM SYSTEM means an alarm system
that is used to detect a hazardous condition in
or about a non-residential structure or area.
2. RESIDENTIAL ALARM SYSTEM means an alarm system
that is used to detect a hazardous condition in
or about a structure or area that is used
primarily for non-business purposes and
intended for habitation, including individual
dwelling unit(s) within a single or multiple
family structure.
D. ALARM USER'S PERMIT means a document containing
pertinent information about the alarmed premises and
its authorized user as required by the Chief of
Police.
E. AUDIBLE ALARM means that type of alarm system which,
when activated, emits an audible sound.
F. AUTOMATIC PROTECTION DEVICE means a device that
reports a hazardous condition to a remote location
over the regular telephone network by dialing a
preprogrammed telephone number then delivering a
prerecorded voice message identifying the nature and
location of the alarm.
G. CITY means City of San Jacinto.
H. CHIEF OF POLICE means the Chief of Police of the
City of San Jacinto or his authorized
representative.
I. FALSE ALARM means an alarm signal to which police
respond, or are summoned to respond, but where a
hazardous condition does not exist, but does not
include signals caused through circumstances beyond
the control of the alarm user,..such as telephone
line interferences or outages, or acts of nature.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
J. HAZARDOUS CONDITION means an event(s) or
occurrence(s) which is indicative of a robbery,
burglary, or other condition which poses a hazard or
threat to persons or property and for which the
alarm system is intended to detect or alert.
K. PERSON means any individual, partnership, firm,
company, association, organization, or corporation.
L. POLICE DEPARTMENT means the Police Department of the
City of San Jacinto, California.
8.20.030 - City Business License Requirements
A. No alarm company operator or alarm agent shall be
permitted to sell on premises, alter, install,
maintain, move, repair, replace, respond, lease, or
monitor any alarm system without first obtaining a
city business license to operate within the City.
8.20.040 - Conditions
Each person utilizing any alarm system shall comply with
the following conditions.
A. Audible Alarms
Audible "commercial" alarm systems shall be equipped
with an automatic shut-off mechanism capable of
terminating the audible annunciator after activation
within a maximum time of thirty (30) minutes.
Audible "residential" alarm systems shall be
,nrIllippc,ri with an automatic shut -off ric,vir•cD capable
of terminating the audible annunciator after
activation within a maximum time of fifteen (15)
minutes.
The annunciator, when activated, shall not resemble
the sound of any type of sirens utilized by
emergency vehicles.
B. Power Requirements
The alarm system shall not transmit a signal nor
activate an annunciator indicating the existence of
a hazardous condition when its power is interrupted
or restored unless a hazardous condition does, in
fact, exist.
1 0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C. Emergency Information
Emergency information relating to persons who can be
contacted reference alarm activations shall be the
responsibility of the alarm monitoring service on
those commercial or residential systems so designed.
Emergency information relating to persons who can be
contacted reference alarm activation on non-
monitoring services shall be filed with the Police
Department concurrently with the issue or renewal of
the required Alarm User's Permit required in Section
8.20.050. The Police Department shall be notified
immediately of any changes in persons responsible
for operating the alarm system.
D. Automatic Protection Devices
Automatic protection devices shall not be keyed to
any police department telephone line.
E. Multiple Premises
Any person who occupies more than one building,
suite, office, or other tenancy in which an alarm
system is installed or used, and the alarm system is
monitored, shall adjust or alter the alarm system to
automatically indicate to the person receiving the
alarm, which building, office, suite, or tenancy
from which the alarm originates.
F. Public Nuisance
The City Council hereby deems a public nuisance any
alarm Vi-P111 which by the oppration t malfunction or
misuse violates the provisions and conditions set
forth in Sections 8.20.040A or 8.20.040D and in
doing so, directs the Police Department to cause to
be disconnected or disabled the alarm system or
component part(s) causing the nuisance until
corrective measures can be taken by the system user
or owner.
8.20.050 - Alarm User's Permit Required
An Alarm User's Permit-to operate an alarm system shall
be obtained by the responsible owner of each alarmed
premise, ,having a different mailing address, in
compliance with the following conditions:
A. The Alarm User's Permit shall be obtained from the
City of San Jacinto prior to utilizing the alarm
system. Systems that are in use prior to the
effective date of this Chapter shall have one
hundred and twenty (120) days in which to obtain the
Alarm User's Permit.
B. An Alarm User's Permit Fee shall be paid for the
Alarm User's Permit as required by City Council
Resolution at the time of Business License renewal
or as otherwise specified herein.
C. Persons applying for an Alarm User's Permit for
a residential alarm system, who are sixty (60) years
of age or over, shall be exempt from paying a fee
but shall otherwise comply with all other provisions
of this Chapter.
D. Any person applying for an Alarm User's Permit who
is a governmental entity or a public school district
shall be exempt from paying a fee, but shall
otherwise comply with all provisions of this
Chapter.
E. Alarm User's Permits shall be non-transferable to
other persons or locations, thereby requiring a new
permit upon any change of business owner, resident,
or location.
F. Possession of an Alarm User's Permit shall not
guarantee the availability of Police response nor
preclude the discontinuance of Police response due
to violations set forth in Section 8.20.070.
G. An Alarm User's Permit shall not be renewed if
Police response has been discontinued as provided
herein.
H. It shall be unlawful for any person to use or
operate an alarm system without first obtaining an
Alarm User's Permit.
8.20.060 - Alarm Systems Terminating at City
Police Department's Alarm Panel
A. . Any alarm system to be considered for connection to
the Police Alarm Panel must be approved by the Chief
of Police.
B. Residential alarm systems will not be accepted for
connection to the Police Alarm Panel.
1 0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C. Such alarm systems shall not be tested by the Police
Department, at the person's request, more than once
per month, unless authorized by the Chief of Police.
D. The Chief of Police may order such alarm systems to
be disconnected if they violate any section of this
chapter.
E. An Alarm User's Permit must be obtained and the
required fee for alarms terminating at the Police
Panel paid prior to connection.
8.20.070 - Termination of Police Services
Violation of any portion of the below written
subparagraphs "A" through "E" may result in
discontinuance of Police Response to any alarm signal
received by the Police Department and may not be
reinstated until authorized by the Chief of Police. A
reinstatement charge shall be assessed in such amount as
the City Council may determine by resolution.
A. False Alarms
1. The following schedule lists the number of
allowable false alarms within the specified
time period:
a. Three (3) false alarms within any 180-day
period; or
b. Five (5) false alarms within any 365-day
period.
In addition to the discontinuance of police
response by reason of excessive false alarms as
provided herein, the owner of the alarmed
premises shall be subject to such
administrative fees for false response as may
be determined from time to time by resolution
of the City Council.
2. Exception:
a. A thirty (30) day adjustment period to
correct mechanical problems will be
allowed for any new, improved, or replaced
alarm system.
10
1 1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2
26
27
28
B. Intentional Activations
1. The intentional activation of an alarm system
by any person, when a hazardous condition does
not exist, shall be cause for immediate
discontinuance of Police response. Such
hazardous conditions are to include only those
which the person's alarm system was
specifically designed to protect or to alert
the Police Department.
C. Non-payment of Alarm User's Permit fee and/or Police
alarm panel fee.
D. Non-compliance with the Business and Professions
Code of the State of California and San Jacinto
Municipal Code as it pertains to alarm users
contracting with unlicensed alarm company operators
or alarm agents.
E. Non-compliance with the provisions of Sections
8.20.040A or 8.20.040D.
8.20.080 - Appeals to Council
Any person whose alarm service is ordered discontinued by
the Chief of Police may appeal such decision to the City
Council within fifteen (15) days from the date such order
is issued. If appealed, such order of discontinuance or
termination shall not be operative until the City Council
rules on said appeal. The City Council may affirm,
modify, or overrule the order of the Chief of Police.
8.20.090 - Severability Clause
If any section or part of any section of this Chapter is
for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by
the decision of any court or competent jurisdiction, the
remainder hereof not thereby invalidated shall remain in
full force and effect. The Council of the City of San
Jacinto hereby declares that it is the intent of such
Council that it would have passed all the other portions
of this Chapter independent of the elimination herefrom
of any such portion as may be declared invalid.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2
26
27
28
8.20.100 - Violation - Penalty
A. Infraction. Notwithstanding the assessment of any
other assessments, fees, or charges, contained
herein above, any person violating any provisions of
this ordinance is guilty of an infraction and upon
conviction thereof shall be punished by:
1. A fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100)
for a first violation;
2. A fine not exceeding two hundred dollars ($200)
for a second violation of this ordinance within
one (1) year;
3. A fine not exceeding five hundred dollars
($500) for each additional violation of this
ordinance within one (1) year.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the said City
Council on the day of , 1991.
MOVED, PASSED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
the City Council on the day of
1991 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
Deputy City Clerk
1 0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Fire Depa
Memo
• 4'
June 28, 1991
TO:
SUBJEC I :
City Council, via Pamela Easter, City Manager
Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief/Safety Officer,_
IN JULY AND ILLNESS PRef..3
Reco niw endation:
Adopt a Resolution which establishes an employee health and safety policy statement and
adopts the City's Injury and Illness Prevention Program.
Background:
The City's Safety Committee was established six months ago and has developed an
Injury and Illness Prevention Program. The Safety Committee meets monthly to
address all City safety needs and problem and also investigates and discusses all
accidents involving City employees and property.
Every employer in California must have an injury and illness prevention program in
compliance with SB #198 or be subject to Cal/OSHA fines for regulatory violations of
up to $2,000. An acceptable program must be in place by July 1, 1991. In summary,
the program must be in writing and identify the person(s) responsible for its
implementation. In addition, it must contain the following elements:
A system to ensure that employees comply with safe practices.
2. A system for communicating with employees about safety matters and their right
to report unsafe work practices or conditions without fear of reprisal.
3. A system for identifying and evaluating workplace hazards, including a
recordkeeping system of periodic inspections, unsafe conditions noted, and
corrective actions taken.
4. A system for investigating occupational injuries and illnesses.
June 23, 1991 Page
City of San Jacinto Injury at I hiess Prevention Program
5. A system for correcting unsafe conditions in a timely manner based on the
severity of the hazard.
6. Training and instruction to employees and supervisors including detailed
documentation of such training.
It is an established fact that a well trained, well disciplined and well supervised
individual in a safe and healthful environment is less likely to have an accident. The
objectives of the proposed Injury and Illness Prevention Program are focused upon this
accomplishment. The primary objective of the City of San Jacinto Injury and Illness
Prevention Program is to insure compliance with SB #198 and the California
Occupational Safety and Health Act (CaVOSHA), Section 3203. The Program does the
following:
1. Establishes and maintains an effective Injury and Illness Prevention Program in
compliance with the requirements of SB #198.
2. Provides a safe and healthy working environment for all employees.
Reduces the human and financial losses resulting from injuries and illness arising
out of or occurring during the course of employment.
4. Establishes safety policies, committees, training and communications processes
which will contribute to, and be part of, the Injury and Illness Prevention
Program.
5. Establishes on-going injury and illness prevention programs for all departments.
The Fire Chief has been designated by the City Manager to be the City's Safety Officer
and will administer and maintain the Injury and Illness Prevention Program. The
Finance Director is the City's Risk Manager and will administer workers' compensation
claims, maintain all the records required by law, and administer the City's self-
insurance program.
The theme of the City's Injury and Illness Prevention Program is:
"SAFETY - A SHARED RESPONSIBILITY.°
June Page 2
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A CITY INJURY AND IL P41 .. 'SS EIREVENTION
PROGRAM
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto to provide a safe
working environment and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto to promote the safety
and welfare to its employees;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS FOUND, DETERMINED AND ORDERED AS
FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council of the City of San Jacinto adopts the following policy statement
concerning health and safety:
The City of San Jacinto is sincerely concerned with the safety and welfare of its employees and the
public it serves. It acknowledges an obligation as an employer to provide the safest possible working
conditions. It acknowledges an obligation as an employer to provide the safest possible working
conditions for employees and a safe environment for the public that uses City services.
The City of San Jacinto, through its management, is committed to the safety and health of all
employees and recognizes the need to comply with regulations governing injury and accident prevention
and employee safety.
The personal safety and health of each employee of the City of San Jacinto is of primary
importance. The prevention of occupationally-induced injuries and illnesses is of such consequence that it
will always be given precedence over operating productivity.
To the degree possible, management will provide all mechanical and physical facilities required for
personal safety and health.
2. The City Council of the City of San Jacinto adopts the City of San Jacinto Injury and
Illness Prevention Program.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of July 1991 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Mayor
Deputy City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. duly adopted by the said
City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the (hie sot forth therein.
City Clerk
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
June 28, 1991
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ABANDON ALLEY BETWEEN
SEVENTH AND SANTO STREETS, EAST OF JORDAN AVENUE
When Naper Villas, located on the southeast corner of Jordan and Seventh was
developed in the 1960's, an alley along the east property line was required to be
dedicated to the City. This alley has never been improved or maintained by the City,
although the City does have a water line in it. The alley has previously been used as
a short cut for occasional pedestrians and vehicles.
Recently, an adjacent resident, having experienced a series of harassing situations,
requested an encroachment pelluit to fence (gate) the alley. After consulting with the
City Attorney, Police Chief, and Fire Chief, this permit was issued subject to certain
conditions.
After the fence (gates) were installed, some of the residents of Naper Villas objected.
The Department Heads held a meeting with Naper Villa residents to hear their
viewpoint. Later, the City Attorney was again consulted.
After conferring on this issue, staff determined the best course of action to be the
abandonment of the alley. The resolution before you starts this process.
Respectfully,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:Ir
\ MEMO.CC\ALLEY.7TH
RESOLUTION NO. 4.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, OF INTENTION TO ORDER
ABANDONMENT OF AN ALLEY LOCATED BETWEEN SEVENTH STREET
AND SANTO DRIVE.
The City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, does
hereby declare its intent to vacate and abandon certain portion of
the public right-of-way under and through the property hereinafter
described in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, State
of California.
A map of said right-of-way proposed to be vacated and abandoned is
on file in the office of the Department of Community Development
in the City of San Jacinto to which reference is hereby made for
further particulars.
Notice is hereby given to all persons interested in or objecting
to the proposed vacation and abandonment that a hearing thereon
will be held at the Community Center in the City of San Jacinto
located at 625 South Pico Street, San Jacinto, California, at 7:30
p.m. Tuesday, August 6, 1991 which set time is no less than fifteen
(15) days from the adoption of this Resolution.
The City Clerk is directed to publish this resolution in the manner
prescribed by law for the publishing of ordinances of the City and
to post notices of vacation conspicuously along the line of the
property proposed to be vacated at least ten (10) days before the
date hereinabove set for hearing, said notices shall be posted and
shall state that this resolution has been adopted, and the time and
place hereinabove set forth for hearing thereon.
MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED this 2nd day of July 1991.
Mayor
ATTEST
Deputy City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of
Resolution No. duly adopted by the said City Council
of the City of San Jacinto on the date therein set forth.
Deputy City Clerk
nnnnn• —7rr (1.3 t190) O324-(7 Ard o 28• 505 34 •0 p. //8 95 00-2 PVT. .0 Lot pVr 3c6 310 31...a :3N 316, ' 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • ® 0 0 30. xs" fi 3.Y4 4;g 33,0 1/ , @ 29 () q) g @ 0 n 27• 16. 25• c'7 3j 3.13 22 2/. 20. /9 49 31:7 3p 3.!Z5 /6 3991 33 39- / 28.4c Pot. Lot 701 CA 6,4 3 36 e.e ,• tfel 9 •• j 1@ 3 (q) 13 /2 4 /8 /7 • /6 34.5) 369 ...727 .4/89-.rr. o'.e° G .52 6152+45 1714-&2LIL—°'s7—'22—C C.4 P[34 Lo/ 70 Lot I" (2— A PS. 85 1F-1 -5/2 31 (4e, oc.) est, 5); :3..1‘.7 TT 5 V .5-P 3 35`t 4 4.0 PAR 2 SAN JAC/A/TO Girl Lot 0 LIMITS Sh1744,151:?---- Al 89.4 0.70.' _7,999,5T 3-74i 43 0 a 41Er- '64 1.4e,o, 4 4 45 t 4-9 48 3677 2.)•-11 ks) 47 l 46 3 9 4001 3?.3 4 40 341; 31 3 • 23 22 11.1 3t9 44 sq .3(4) 6 0 0 2/ 2)1 3g/ Lai I _Oro' 6_4N TO /1/89. S-T • 00.1- 3-50' PVT Pi 2,044f, Pot Lot 68 3 9 2 201 1 -2 19 V Lof X PVT • 3P -56 3 3 . a , o. 0 ••• 39 J .3 0 389 • -5 i•-.7 3 85 4 j 5 . , 0AR-1111/UT 130 - /1 Le, e Lor 68 58 LOT LINE 2•X'Z ,... 2.. i• 9- 310 26° 4.0 '2 3i& 27 . 0 3.(... 28 o @ 4 ,74, .3V ...... 90 q 9 30'130 9/
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
June 28, 1991
ACQUISITION OF FLOOD CONTROL RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR
PREMIER HOMES - TRACT 22882-2
As a condition to Tentative Tract 22882-2, the right-of-way for Master Plan Storm
Drain (Line J) was to be granted to the City.
Pursuant to Riverside County Flood Control Policies, Premier Homes, is entitled to a
credit for the value of the property granted.
An appraisal was prepared by Stephen G. White MAT, of Anaheim, for the .806 acres
granted to the City. The value of this property was determined to be $55,000.
Staff recommends that Premier Homes be granted a credit against fees in the amount
of $55,000.
Respectfully,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:lr
\MEMO.CC\22882-2.ROW
RAMONA
‘v-LOT 'F . LVI JU
//4/1//4)//i/V////r////
EXPRESSWAY
775.33'
IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIvERSTnE
T ALT O. 228b2-2
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
Via City Manager
FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance Director
SUBJECT: County Study - Structural fire, Library and
Property tax
DATE: July 2, 1991
The City of Moreno Valley has engaged Hughes, Heiss to
complete a study of the County's methodology and calculation of
structural fire tax, library tax, etc. Hughes Heiss is charging
Moreno Valley $8,000.
Moreno Valley has asked if other cities are interested in the
study and share in the costs. Estimated buy-in is $500 for the
City of San Jacinto, with Moreno Valley, bearing the balance.
Hughes, Heiss would do analysis of tax calculations for the City
of San Jacinto at the same time that they are reviewing the other
cities. At this time the Cities of Hemet and Temecula have jointed
in this effort.
On March 19, 1991 council requested audits be performed and
this agreement would fall under such direction. Funds are
available for the audit allocations and at this time the agreement
need to be ratified to include audit services from
Hughes & Heiss, for the purpose of auditing fire, library and
property tax collected by the County for this purpose. Attached
is Hughes, Heiss report to Moreno Valley's City Manager outlining
the audit process.
RECOMMENDATION:
Ratify council consensus of special audits, to include Hughes,
Heiss, in an amount not to exceed $500.00 of which funds are
available under special audits.
675 Mariners Island Blvd./Suite 108 35 S. Raymond Ave./Suite 220
San Mateo, California 94404 Pasadena, California 91105
415/570-6111 ,f3j8/5841111
City Manager's
Of fie
[JUN 17
RECEIVED
MOMMIMINN
Hughes, Heiss & Associates
MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS
Gene Rogers
Assistant City Manager
City of Moreno Valley
Building B
23119 Cottonwood
Moreno Valley, California
Dear Gene:
After our discussion on Monday, April 22nd, I've given some thought to the
questions you raised about tax transfer/revenue transfer issues associated with fire
and library services. Based on that discussion, I understand your concerns
include the following:
• Did the City receive all fire service related revenues when the decision
was made to withdraw from Riverside County for structural fire
protection funding purposes? This includes:
That portion of the property tax rate dedicated to support of
structural fire protection services including any special district
augmentation funds employed at the time of withdrawal (as either
part of or in addition to the fire service related property tax rate).
How the base property tax revenue to be transferred was calculated
at the time of withdrawal; whether or not that amount reflected all
revenues related to fire protection; and the rate employed to calculate
City share in the years following transfer.
• Since the same revenue transfer provisions relate to library services
based on agreements between Moreno Valley and Riverside County, you
have the same concerns related to library related revenues which would
be transferred to the City if the decision is made to assume responsibility
for library operations and services.
• How is the structural fire tax rate and related tax revenues treated in
regard to the Moreno Valley Redevelopment Agency/Redevelopment area?
Are fire protection revenues generated from the redevelopment area
available to support fire protection costs, or are they retained by the
Redevelopment Agency to support redevelopment activities? What would
happen to library related revenues/taxes involved with the Redevelopment
Area if the City decided to establish an in-house library?
• Given current services levels provided by the County Library to Moreno
Valley, are the cost of those services equivalent to, greater than, or less
than library related property tax revenues generated from within the
City?
• Finally, did the City receive its share of fire related development fees
generated prior to incorporation or were any/all fees employed to
construct new or expanded fire facilities or assets necessary to extend
services within the Moreno Valley area?
To address these issues, we would propose to accomplish the following work
steps:
• Through interview with staff in the Riverside County Auditor's Office,
appropriate staff from the County Administrator's Office, and review of
historical budgets and Assessor's roles, document the following:
How property tax rates/percent shares of the property tax dollar were
calculated in Riverside County in the years immediately following
passage and implementation of Proposition 13, with special focus on
the library and structural fire protection rates.
How special district augmentation funds were employed by the
County during the same period to support structural fire protection
and /or library services.
How library services and fire services were funded over the same
period to include composition of the tax rates related to both services
considering "dedicated" property tax rates and disposition of special
district augmentation funds. This analysis would trace patterns
from 1978-79 through the current fiscal year.
• Analyze how the property tax transfer related to City assumption of
responsibility for structural fire protection services was calculated and
compare to the results of the first work step. This includes two steps:
The property tax rate transferred and whether or not that rate
represents "full share" based on the development of that rate and
structure of fire service funding following Proposition 13.
- Analyze whether or not the "base revenue" transferred upon City
withdrawal reflected:
0 0 All property tax revenues generated from Moreno Valley by the
rate in place at that time.
• • "Full share" tax rates as analyzed above.
2
• Then, accomplish the same analysis related to the library service
property tax rate and:
Isolate key factors the City should employ to effect tax transfer which
would support capturing all library related property tax revenues
generated from Moreno Valley.
Calculate the amount which would be transferred now if the City
opted to establish its own Library system.
• Interview staff from the Riverside County Library and review current
budget data. Based on the results of these data collection activities:
Document scope/content of library services provided to and in
Moreno Valley by the Riverside County Library. This includes
services in the City and any central services which support local
branch operations and would need to be replicated at the local level if
the library were a stand alone operation.
Calculate the cost of these services based on Fiscal Year 1990-91
Operations.
Compare the results of this analysis to the previously calculated
library related revenues generated from Moreno Valley and provide
the resulting service cost-revenue comparison.
• Concurrent with tracing how the County Fire related property tax rate
was developed, also document Riverside County's policies and practices
related to assessment and collection of development fees related to fire
protection system facilities' and equipment expansion requirements.
More specifically:
Determine development fee structure pre-incorporation.
Document and analyze county policies related to collection, reserve,
and expenditure of development fees from the early 1980's until the
City began assessing fire service development fees. This includes:
O 0 How development fees were levied on Moreno Valley area
developments prior to incorporation.
• • Amount of fee revenue generated.
O 0 How fee revenues were expended.
• • Any balances remaining and their disposition post-
incorporation.
• Finally, trace tax rates and disposition of property tax revenues related to
fire and library services generated from the Moreno Valley
redevelopment area. This would include:
Person Hours
40to56 ( $3,600 to $5,040
$1,440 to $2,160 16 to 24
Analyzing how rates apply to the base and increment.
Identifying revenues generated based on the above to determine if:
0 0 Rates are applied to the base and increment for fire and/or
library property tax generation purposes.
Full or partial revenues (base plus increment or incremently
only) are generated and channelled to support of library and/or
fire services.
We would plan to document the results of each of these tasks in a series of
letter reports which would describe our findings in detail. Consistent with our
previous discussion, our analysis would focus on determining if issues exist
related to the various revenue transfer questions, and the order of magnitude of
resources involved if issues are identified. The various analyses would not be
detailed financial audits. If issues are identified based on our analysis, you would
plan to conduct financial audits as a next step in pursuing revenues to which the
City has claim.
Since many of the issues are interrelated, we would propose to approach the
analysis on a time and materials basis. Under this approach, we would provide
you an estimate of the time required to complete each step and receive your
authorization to proceed before undertaking any work. Preliminary estimates of
the time required to resolve each issue are listed below.
Task
Trace property tax rate
development and allocation of
special district augmentation
funds to fire and library
services. Relate to actual and/or
potential property tax transfer
and calculate estimated amounts
for library and fire service.
Compare fire revenues to
amounts actually
transferred/identify issues.
• Document library service costs
in Moreno Valley. Compare to
revenues. Note issues.
4
Task Person Hours
• Analyze how fire and library
property tax rates are applied
within the Moreno Valley
Redevelopment area. Estimate
revenues generated and note
issues.
4to 6 $360 to $720
I am prepared to refine our work approach and the related cost estimates
based upon your review of this letter. Please give me a call when you are ready to
get together.
Sincerely yours,
John W. Heiss HUGHES, HEISS & ASSOCIATES
Principal
5
Respectfully,
/7)
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 28, 1991
TO: Mayor Boykin and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian K. McNabb, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Tract 21943, Final Extension of Time, Par Mat Partnership
The applicant is requesting a final one-year extension of time to
record Tentative Tract 21943, which is located in Village #1 of
Soboba Springs Specific Plan. A request for a second extension of
time was approved by the Planning Commission on June 13, 1990 with
an expiration date of June 1, 1991. However, for final extensions
of time, the City's Subdivision Ordinance requires that the City
Council be the approving authority.
Village I (Tentative Tract 21943) was originally approved for use
as condominiums. Historically, condominium ventures have not
received an enthusiastic market response within the San Jacinto
area. As a result, Par Mat Partnership is considering changing the
product type from condominiums to single-family dwellings. However,
the applicants would like to keep the map activated in the event
that market conditions for condominiums become favorable in the
near term.
At this time staff would like to recommend that the City Council
impose an additional condition of approval for Tentative Tract
21943 to mitigate the impacts of future development on school
facilities. This condition would read as follows:
"Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the
applicant shall pay all school mitigation fees mandated
by Government Code Section 65995 and join an as sment
distrct
conuction.
as r ired by the Ci Counci o finance
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
\FINAL.MAP\21943.JUL
r5 4 I I I PUX I IL r 4• 24.17—w 50502' '345 110 It** k\IS 14:-A Y :11 Sr I 1 1 Ptlx I CI r.Sc13 11:E.;1EiE • 179:3:•,1_,D L3' Lola^. 2 52,,vsy•E 21 '9' _ _52,292rE 2.0 _ --Sze:25—.5$*C- • i-i'ET:LN:1 3 Ii L.., il. 1 14 PLEX SAN JACI TO RIVER FLTY:00 4401 2 IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RI VERSI DE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 21943 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL 2 AND OF A PORTION OF PARCEL 3, BOTH OF PARCEL MAP NO. 19805 4S SAID MAP IS ON FILE IN BOOK 123, PAGES 22 THROUGH 26, INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 34.4 • c)
Soboba Springs Partnership
16692 Espola Road
Poway, CA 92064
City Council
City of San Jacinto
San Jacinto, CA
Re: Soboba Springs, Village TM #21943
Honorable Councilmembers:
We wish wish to thank you for your time and effort over the past
two years in helping us develop our project.
Presently we are working on a new plan to reduce the density
to approximately 55 units from the present 75, keeping in mind
the requirements for servicing the anticipated debt of the Mello-
Roos district. This will require units in the 1500 to 1800
square foot size range, rather than the currently proposed 1200
square foot size.
Discussions with your staff have encouraged us to pursue
this concept, as it is more in line with the desired mix of units
in that area. We agree that it would be more attractive, and may
enhance the project's financing and marketability.
I n order to pursue this process we are requesting a one-year
extension of our existing Tract Map #21943. We hope to have
plans ready for your review within four to six months, and the
need for a full year extension is to cover the possibility that
it will not be ready as anticipated.
Again, hank you for your efforts and interest in our
project.
Sincerely,
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
June 28, 1991
Final Tract Map 26020-2
APPLICANT: OLD MOUNTAIN ROAD ASSOCIATES
163 E. Main Street
San Jacinto, CA 92383
714-654-4454
LOCA l'ION: Between Shaver and Evans, East of Las Rosas Streets
Attached is a copy of the subdivision agreement and record map for Final Tract Map
26020-2. This map is the second and final map phase of the Montage Development.
The approval of a final map is considered "ministerial", meaning, it cannot be denied
provided it meets the requirements of the City, including the conditions of approval.
If the conditions have not been met, the Council must deny the request for approval
until such time as they have been met.
The applicant has submitted the subdivision agreement and the necessary bonding. The
City Engineer has reviewed the map and found it to be in conformance with the tract
map. The conditions of approval have all been met with one possible exception.
Environmental Condition #6 reads: "Pay all school fees and participate as required by
the City in an assessment district to finance school facilities."
When Phase I was approved, this condition was, in essence, waived because the school
district had not made a request for the City Council to require the district. They have
now made this request. The Council has three basic choices:
It can approve the final map, which mean the Council will not impose Condition
#6.
2. It can determine all conditions have not been met and deny the final map until
such time as the applicant joins the financing district.
3. If the Council is unclear as to whether the condition has been met or their legal
right to impose the condition, the Council can continue the matter until July 16,
1991. A continuance would allow time to clarify this issue.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
\FINALMAP\26020-2.JUL
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 2nd day of July, 1991, by and between OLD MOUNTAIN ROAD ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, BY: RICE DEVELOPMENT INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATI
O
N
,
GENERAL PARTNER, the parties of the first part, hereinafter
designated and called "contractor" and the CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN JACINTO, a Municipal Corporation of the County of Riverside,
State of California, acting by and through Francis R. Boykin, as
Mayor and Pamela L. Lee as Deputy City Clerk, thereunto authorized
so to act, the party of the second part, hereinafter designated and
called "Council".
WITNESSETH
THAT, WHEREAS, said contractor has presented to the City Council
of the City of San Jacinto, to wit: Tract 26020-2, a copy of which
said proposed map is attached to this agreement and is hereby
referred to and made a part of this agreement for any and all
particulars, and has requested the said City Council to accept the
dedication of the street or streets delineated and shown on said
map as and for a public street or highway, or streets and highways,
and to otherwise approve said map to the end that said map may be
recorded as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto requires as
a condition precedent to the acceptance and approval of said map
the dedication of such streets, highways and public ways as
delineated and shown on said map and deems the same as necessary
for the public use; that any street or streets delineated and shown
on said map may be improved by the construction thereon and
installation therein of grading, paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks,
storm drains, sanitary sewers, street name signs, survey monuments,
and water pipes and mains, together with fire hydrants.
18
AND, WHEREAS, the improvement of said street or streets, highway
19 or highways, as shown and delineated on said map as by the Cit
y
Council of the City of San Jacinto required and deemed as necessary
20 for the public use has not been done or completed and said
contractor shall as provided by Ordinance No. 673 of the City of
21 San Jacinto, and by an Act of the Legislature of the State of
California, entitled, "An Act relating to the real estate!
22 subdivisions and the making and recording of maps, and granting!
limited powers to cities and towns, and counties, in connection!
23 therewith, making certain acts misdemeanors, prescribing penalties!
therefore, and repealing acts or portions of acts in conflict;
24
herewith", enter into this Agreement with the City, whereby in'
consideration of the acceptance of the offers of dedication by the
25 City Council of the City of San Jacinto, the Contractor agrees tor
complete the work hereinafter in this agreement mentioned and set!
9 6 forth in detail to be done by contractor within the time
hereinafter mentioned.
27
28
99
30
31
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the
acceptance of the offers of dedication of street and streets shown
and delineated on said map and the approval of said map for filing
and recording as provided and required by law, it is mutually
agreed and understood by and between Contractor and Council do
hereby mutually agree as follows:
2
3
4
6
8
9
0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Page
3
1. That the City Council of the City of San Jacinto has
fixed and does hereby fix the time within which contractor is to
do and perform the work and improvements hereinafter stated and
specified as being the period of time to expire between the date
3 of this agreement and the 2nd day of July, 1992, and that contractor will, at his own cost and expense, including all costs
4 of inspection or inspections done by the City of San Jacinto within
the period of time hereinabove in Paragraph 1 of this agreement
5 stated and fixed, do or cause to be done and performed the
following described work and/or improvements to wit:
All 6 offsite improvements as shown on Approved Improvement Plans for
Tract 26020-2.
7
It is expressly agreed and understood by contractor that
8 City shall inspect all said work to be done by an inspector
employed by the City at the cost and expense of contractor and that
9 contractor will pay unto City on demand the actual cost of such
inspection.
10
2. All of the said work and improvements and the materials
therefore shall be done, performed and installed in strict
accordance with plans and specifications therefore on file which
are hereby adopted and made a part of this agreement.
311 3. Contractor shall, at the time of the execution of this
agreement present to and file with the City of San Jacinto a bond
1411 in the sum of TWO HUNDRED THIRTEEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED FIFTY
AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($213,350.00) which sum it is hereby agreed is 1511 the sum fixed by the City of San Jacinto for that purpose,
i
n
accordance with the provisions of Section 11612 of the Business and
611 Professional Code and Section 66499 et.seg. of the Government Co
d
e
,
conditioned upon the faithful performance by contractor of this
711 agreement and by its terms made to inure the benefit of the C
i
t
y
of San Jacinto and contractor shall also at the time present to and
811 file with the City of San Jacinto, a good and sufficient bond
i
n
the sum of TWO HUNDRED THIRTEEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED FIFTY AND 1911 NO/100 DOLLARS ($213,350.00) and by its terms made to inure to the
benefit of laborer and material suppliers upon such work and
2011 improvements conditioned upon the payment of such labore
r
a
n
d
material suppliers for labor and material performed or rendered
211! under the terms of said contract, and for amounts due unde
r
t
h
e
Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor as!
2211 provided by State Law.
23 4. Contractor shall before commencing any work as herein
provided for, take out and at all times maintain during the course
24 of such work, workmen's compensation insurance required by the
l
a
w
s
of the State of California, and failing to do so, City may procure
such insurance for said contractor and contractor shall pay City
such monies as the City may be compelled to pay therefore.
9 6
5: Contractor shall save the City Council, City of San!
271 Jacinto, and the officers and employees of said City of
S
a
n
Jacinto, harmless against injuries to persons and damage to
281 property, which may occur by reason or in connection with any w
o
r
k
done as provided and contemplated by this agreement and contractor
29 shall procure and carry at all times during the course of said
work, liability insurance therefore in the amount of one million
301 dollars ($1,000,000) in favor of contractor and City Council, City , of San Jacinto, and the officers and employees of the City
o
f
S
a
n
311 Jacinto as long as any work is being done as provided by
t
h
i
s
agreement. Page 2
By
Francis R. Boykin, Mayor
13
14
17
State of California
Riverside County of
}S S.
OFFICIAL SEAL
LAURA A. MORA
Notary Public - California
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
My Commissicn Expires Sept. 24,1994
•
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, contractor, as parties
o
f
t
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
p
a
r
t
,
h
a
v
e
hereunto set their hands and the City Co
u
n
c
i
l
h
a
s
c
a
u
s
e
d
t
h
e
s
e
presents to be executed in the name of the
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
of San Jacinto, by its officers thereunto
d
u
l
y
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
day and year in this agreement first above
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
.
2
3
4
6
7
12
By )/
OLD MOUNTAIN ROAD ASSOCIATES, A
CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BY:
RICE DEVELOPMENT INC., A CALIFORNIA
CORPORATION, GENERAL PARTNER
CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
8
9
0
19
20
21
GENERAL ACKNOWLEDG ENT
On this th 2 _ 5 t y o f June e___rlita
Laura A Mora
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
Gerald Rice
ID personally known to me
[2 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged that executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal.
CAL— 23
19 91 before me,
Notar'0,2fultisture
BY: DEPUTY JULY 1990 SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE rutivr KIABREc.AN Tr751 oNsurrEANGE ENBINEER'S STATEMEE I HEREBY STATE THAT I AN A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER AF THE STATE or CALIFORNIA AND THAT THIS RAP CONSISTING OF FP46 (5) SHEETS CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SuRVEY MADE UNDER BY SUPERVISION DURING .PR', IQ : THAT ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST AND THEIR POSITIONS ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN. OR WILL BE IN PLACE WITHIN ONE YEAR FROM THE RECORDATION OF THIS MAP, THE MONUMENTS WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. THE SURVEY IS TRUE AND cl*FtETE AS SHOWN. If-12 DATED THIS DAY OF 19 , . 19 . MICHAEL J. A.C.E. 26406 B.C.E. EXPIRATION DATE DATED THIS MAYOR CITY OF SAN JAC/NTO ATTEST. . CITY CLERK CITY OF SAN JACINTO GERALD A, HALONEY CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CASH TAX BOMB) El, WAYNE WATTS, COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR ATTNtS5 MY HAND AND SEAL. Br. DEPUTY DEPUTY • 1 NY COMM* :!M 195/ , A JACINTO. CALIFORNIA IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF LOTS 16 AND 17 OF H.T. HEWITT'S PLAT OF SAN JACINTO, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK B. PAGE 306 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA. OWNER'S STATER N7 RE HEREBY STATE THAT ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON: THAT WE ARE THE ONLY PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY To BASS A CLEAR TITLE To SAID LAME)) THAT RE CONSENT TO THE TAKING AND IN:50001NR OR THIS SUBDIVISION HAP AS SHOWN WITHIN THE OISTINCTIVE DOWER LINE. RE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY Of SAN JACINTO, FOR STREET AND ruaLtc UTILITY PROPOSES, LOTS 'A THROUGH 'F'. INCLUSIVE, TRACT NO. 26020-2 SHEET 1 OF 5 SHEETS RECORDER'S STATEMENT FILED THIS DAY Or 19 AT M IN ROOK OF RAPS. AT PAGES AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY CLERK NO. FEE WILLIAM E. CONERLY. COUNTY RECORDER N9S/LOWRY...ENOINEERS & PLANNERS CITY ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BY AND THROUGH ITS DULY AUTHOR/ZED OFFICERS AT A REGULAR MEETING OF . HEREBY APPROVES SAID FINAL NAP AND ACCEPTS THE DEDICATIONS SHORN HEREON FOR PUOLIC ROADS on PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF CITY STREETS IS CONTINGENT UPON THE COMPLETION OF ALL STREET IMPROvETENTs. 0Ln MOUNTAIN ROAD ASSOCIATES. A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP RY- VICE DEVELOPmENT INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. GENERAL PARTNER PRESIDENT SIGNATURE omp5l1m PURSUANT TO SECTION 66438 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING TONERS OF EASEHENTS AND/DR OTHER INTERESTS HAVE BEEN OMITTED: rrEEQE IAA OAT Or ERE A AT"-L.. BEFORE NE. .2,_5524.2±__ WARY MS IC IN AND Too s,oin STATE. PERSONALLY PERSONALLY KNOWN To Mt 00 O06LLO TO HE ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EvIDENCE TO hEl THE ' TONS WHO EXECUTEO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AS PRESIDENT TOP 0,05 PEystROPEASN, ENO. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. THE CORPORATION THAT EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT, ANO KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSONS WHO EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUHENT ON BEHALF OF SAID CORPORATION. SAID CORRORATION BRING A GENERAL PARTNER OF OLD PARAJNYNtm moXPASYMOciATES THE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP THAT EXECUTED THE TRUHENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT NATO CORPORATION EXECUTED THE TO GENERAL PARTNER ANN THAT SAID LIMITED PARTNERSHIP EXECUTED THE A RIGHT OF WAY FOR ONE DITCH. FLUME OR OTHER AQUEDUCT, ACROSS THE LAND OF ANY OTHER OWNER LYING BETWEEN Alm AND THE SAN JACINTO RIvER. AS RESERVED TO EACH AND EVERY OWNER OF LANDS IN THE RANCHO SAN JACINTO v/EJOL HIS HEIRS AND ASSIGNS. BY DECREE OF PARTITION OF SAID RANCHO RECORDED IN BOOK 43 PAGE 1E1 OF DEEDS. RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA. CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC PURER CO.--OWNER OF AN EASEMENT FOR EITHER OR BOTH POLE LINES. CONDUITS OR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES PER INST. RECORDED APR 26, 1957 IN BK. 2079 PG. 66, O.R. TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE AS OF THIS DATE. THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE WITHIN HAP FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY. MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTEO AS TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OA SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES. NOV A LIEN BUT NOT YET PAYABLE WHICH ARE ESTIMATED TO BE DATED: 19 . A. WAYNE WATTS. COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR DEPUTY TAX_ BOBO CERTIFICATE I MENEM' CERTIFY THAT A BONO IN THE SUM OF 4 HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND FILED WITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNT,/ OF RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONED UPON THE PAYMENT AF ALL TAXES, STATE. COUNTY. HINICIPAL OR LOCAL. AND ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AG TAXES 101IcH AT THE TINE Or FILING Or THIS RAP WITH THE cOurrtY RECORDER ARE A LIEN AGAINST SAID PROPERTY BUT NOT YET PAYABLE AND SAID BOND HAS BEEN DULY APPROVED BY SAID BOARD Of SUPERVISORS. CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE WITHIN ANNEXED MAP) THAT THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE MAP; THAT ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP Act AND OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY ORDINANCE NO. 673 MARE BEEN COMPLIED WITH AND I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CuysItCt AS SHOWN. PLAWING CONNISSION STATEmENR THIS NAP. TRACT NO. zG020-2 IS A PORT/ON OF THE ORIGINAL TENTATIVE MAP OF TRACT NO. 0505 SAID TENTATIVE MAP WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO PLANNING COmmISSION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAN IN A DULY AUTHORIZED MEETING HELD 19 CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA SECRETARY, CITY OF SAN JACINTO PLANNING COMMISSION DATED THIS PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL THE STREET DEDICATIONS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS sHoWN ON THE WITHIN ANNEXED HAP ARE HEREBY APPROVED THIS DAY or . t9 PUOLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, CITY OF SAN JACINTO SOIL REPORT A PRELIMINARY SOIL REPORT WAS PREPARED BY msAmoffIsmoKripHEMEWASSMING,ENC ON THE 2.27,0 DAY OF MARRA{ 19 ,fT11. AS REQUIRED BY THE HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE OF CALIFORNIA. SECTION 17953. Npeor,,m7,4.46356 DATED THIS DAY CF KCIE R.C.E./11B. DAY OF 19
300 100 100 200 SCALE MS/LOWRY—ENGINEERS G PLANNERS JULY 1990 rml 73ir y 38 083PREy STMEE TOO 2) Is an' C610.000 AS,42 3, ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES AUG PUBLIC SERVICES INSTALLED WITHIN THIS TRACT SHALL BE PLACED UNDERGROUND, 4, 16'7(3/4' GALA,. IRON PIPE W/CONC. CORE SET FLUSH AND TAGGED RCE 26406 DR LEAD AND TAG BCE 26406 SET IN CONC. FOOTING OR ON TOP OF CONC. BLOCK PALL AT ALL REAP LOT COMMAS AND CORNEA CUTBACKS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, O. LOT CORNERS ADJACENT TO STREETS REFERENCED BY LEAD AND TWO RCE 26408 IN CURB ON EXTENSION OF LOT LINES. EXCEPT AT COMER CUTBACKS. B. 0 INDICATES 24'X2' GAO,. IRON PIPE W/CONC. CORE ABS METAL DISC STANPED BCE 26406 SET FLUSH. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. A INDICATES STREET SURVEY MONUMENT SET PER CITY OF SAN JACINTO STANDARDS M-90.0. M-900A ARE 8-901. B. ( 1 INDICATES MEASURED AND RECORD PER AMENDED TR. NO 6020-1 8 '1,2/_12- . UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. C INDICATES MEASURED AND RECORD PER NO 208/88-96. 10. BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP IS THE CENTER LINE OF EVANS STREET TAKEN AS N89.45'46'. PER pe 206/68-96. 11. . INDICATES 2' IRON PIPE W/TAG RCE 28406 FOUND FLUSH PER AMENDED TRUE 28020-1. MO / 12 - lot. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 12. A INDICATES CITY OF SAN JACINTO STREET SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND PEP me 206/86-96 RUG/DR AMENDED TR.NO. 26020-1, MB TIE / a - CU. .7";-n Al 4, 00,06. EVANS TR NC) 23671 IV /TAG 1 35462 CM, le. PER PM lB cZ /116 CURVE DATA A T L. W.1/214 5 541'5' 112.5, ,Y.S4.0. 4450,' 53.411 WNT $47. 9.04. M,,, 550/1.0,0' 56,061 1650 120.54 2,1.4-ii 10511.54.CALC.001 STREET M 2 6./ a 9 6 STAMMT PER,.714r1.3Z) ..., - (128. / CONE. PEW Mt a/Nb S AMENDED CAL.'0, - S 5 ENGINEER'S NOTES I. THIS TRACT HAS 49 LOTS PLUS LOTS °A' THROVE,. 'F°. INCLUSIVE. 2. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 13.43 ACRES WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE, SNAVER, SHEET 2 OF 5 SHEETS IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 26020-2 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF LOTS 16 AND 17 OF H.T. HEWITT'S PLAT OF SAN JACINTO, AS SHOWN BY HAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8, PAGE 386 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. SCALE IN FEET
00 SCALE 1400, 1200' tx141, r45,45.44."W 52154' 1200' 7,00' 7400' 0425,, LOT °AA" 10.00. EVANS STREET ALOT 1260. I 12.00' 111 WAY 4 19 O 22 7200 1200, ;.! 20 g t2 ;eV, 2 1200' 1200' 405511 7200' 72.00' 1400' 1 7200 ° 5001 9 2 a6 4 1400 50 FT. 3 1200 so AL 8 9. GQ. 54• L 1200' 1200' ›T=4' 4.00 g- f 7 ct7q. 4,671.4.?°' 4 4 8 4 9 ;crP,. 132.00._ 8200 0 61,202 /BOO 50. FT CONEXDR .6ZZFez°Z. 5 1200 0 1400' 7.400. 1,00, 070415,3 UN55.45,,,v0 100104. 18 17 ; 6 E ZrPT SHEET 3 OF 5,_L SHEETS IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 26020-2 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF LOTS 16 AND 17 OF H.T. HEWITT'S PLAT OF SAN JACINTO, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8, PAGE 386 OF HAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. SCALE IN FEET N8S/LOWRY...ENGINEERS & PLANNERS AL.Y 1990 SEE SHEET 33 32 31 505.6, /400, I 7 1200' -0400 61; 81 ZL ' Z4 ;I'S Z6 1 Z6 90.FT 50. F -1 ;q49.9r. ;6 50.T. S01.-C-T UI sz 0 0 466-616., 14000,5-0,,4,4304
60 60 120 , SCALE 0 n 17 Al, 44 20 '2 c5,7 Ne.10',70 ,030 26 90. 60-i.1e, , \ _ 2 CONDOR P LOT "C. 5.5n, It 25 i 9, o, 17 9 969, , 14 <d ,/l3 .6%' '477 EVANSH W VI, STREET W D 2 ' w \1„ J > 5 4 CURVE RATA. a 0 29 9 0 10 14 told. gr, 65-5Vor 'Kr 100' 4.4 SHEET 4 OF i SHEETS IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 26020-2 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PORTIONS OF LOTS 16 AND 17 OF H.T. HEWITT'S PLAT OF SAN JACINTO. AS SHOWN BY HAP ON FILE IN BOOK B, PAGE 306 OF UPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. SCALE IN FEET NBS/LOWRY...ENGINEERS G PLANNERS JULY 1990 n1.....150, -
SO 120 INC NBS/LOWRY...ENGINEERS 6 PLANNERS JULY 1990 SHAVER STREET /1=7arfttgM ,N 001' 00,2'33'W 220.11' CALC.01 -N crn N4.0T-N V n /0) • 38 6/• 5• -43- saaz ' 50 5, 4 24 j25 26 SI-1EET 45 30851' q., . 4, 29 '''''6' •,;A? .6? ti VZ, '?n.° t10 03AL a 'SA, 28 32 , .” N0 4,767,,,/ _ 14008' CURVE DATA O- S ( r svos- ESA59.0. ,04, Is Ass J 5.31. 531. S 1' 44,4' • 90.61') ' 44F8T GP11113. SsTAA'SZT O0.6-21 . 500'53 13,01' 100. 4.84 0.." ,as, 1320' ,,•,,sss. .8T SA54, T I. F SHEET 5 OF 5 SHEETS IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 25020-2 BE I NG A SUBDI VISION OF PORT IONS OF LOTS 16 AND 17 OF HI, HEWITT'S PLAT OF SAN JACINTO, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8, PAGE 386 OF HAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA, SCALE IN FEET
VALLEY RESTART SHELTER
PROFILE STATEMENT
HISTORY:
Valley Restart Shelter is an non-profit organization created in March
1989. During winter months we operated the Homeless Shelter Program
at Hemet's National Guard Armory supported by Riverside County Department
of Community Action. We coordinated the preparation and the serving of
evening meals as well as "bag lunches" by a number of concerned groups
in the Hemet/San Jacinto coumunitites. Then in March 1990 the Drop-In
Center was established.
II PURPOSE:
To assist the homeless people in their immediate needs such as hunger
and cleanliness. We also provide direction to the agency or program
that will help them deal with their individual cause of homelessness.
III PRESENT OBJECTIVES:
Over 70 people per day are served by providing emergency assistance in
the form of showers, laundry, clothing, meals, an address, telephones,
limited financial assistance, and jobs. Our counseling services direct
clients to various programs so their problems and addictions may be
dealt with. Over 900 clients have been served since we opened. Over
27,000 evening meals and 20,000 lunches have been provided. We also
try to prevent homelessness by providing aid and emergency services to
low income clients. ALL SERVICES ARE PROVIDED WITHOUT DISCRIMINATION
OR CHARGE TO OUR CLIENTS.
IV PRESENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
We operate a Drop-In Center which is opened daily. Evening meals are
provided by organizing the churches, civic and private groups in the
Valley. They provide a meal program that is valued at $50,000.00 at
no cost to the center. We also operate a Transitional House for
eleven substance free men...at no cost to our program.
V FUTURE OBJECTIVES:
A. Currently, we are looking for a new location which will accommodate
sleeping quarters for 25 to 30 people.
B. A Transition House for women and women with children will be opening
within ninety days.
C. New Policies and Procedures have been establish which will help us
be more efficient in helping clients become more self sufficient by
taking responsibility for their own lives.
D. We can be the "Hub" for client referrals for the non-profit
organizations now in the Valley. It is our desire not to duplicate
services.
VI CONCLUSION:
Valley Restart Shelter sees the permanent shelter as not only a victory
for the homeless, but a project uniting the public and the private
sectors in the San Jacinto Valley. This is a "First of It's kind"
project for Riverside County and a possible "Role Model" for other
small cities in California and the nation.
T HO LESS TASK FORCIAI
A. Summary of previous (5-13-91) meeting that brought about this Task Force.
There is a continuing dispute between a group of neighborhood professionals and the
Valley Restart Shelter Drop-In Center. The dispute evolves around the placement of
a facility in a business neighborhood.
The problems brought out in the meeting were as follows:
1. Existing problems in the park are exacerbated by the presence of
homeless people.
2. Allegations that some of the homeless were involved in drug traffic.
3. Personal problems between Valley Restart Shelter staff and some Of the
professional neighbors.
Areas of agreement brought out during the meeting:
1. Both groups agree that there is a need to move the operation to another
location.
2. Both groups agree that much of the problem existed prior to the locat-
ion of Valley Restart Shelter at their present site.
Both groups agree that the Task Force approach to solving the problem
is the best idea.
B. Special problem areas:
1. At this time there are no funds available to secure another facility for
Valley Restart Shelter.
2. No acceptable site has been located.
C. Tasks before the group:
1. Identify a source of funds that will enable Valley Restart Shelter to
make a move.
a. Purchase or lease of property.
b. Rehabilitation of older property or building a new one.
2. Identify a location that is feasible for the move.
a. Properly zoned for use.
b. Large enough for expansion.
3. Assist with the necessary elements of the move.
a. Handle the inevitable NIMBY syndrome(Not In My Back
Yard). This is necessary to overcome neighborhood resistance.
It is not possible to find a location that will not have some
neighbors.
b. Handle the necessary permits, inspections and other items neces-
sary for the move.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
Department Heads
John Townsel
Rick Vrwtmoid
FROM: Pamel '6ter
DATE: June 27. 1991
SUBJECT: Council/Department Head
Study Session
There will be a joint Councilmember/Department Head Study Session
on Tuesday. July 16 at 3:15 p.m. at the Community Center. This
session will be held prior to our Council Meeting on that evening
so that we can go over our agenda items, answer any questions you
might have and help us to better prepare for the Council meeting
itself.
Please make every effort to attend this important session!
71
AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
AND THE COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
625 South Pico, San Jacinto
DATE: June 25, 1991
TIME: 6:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Boykin, Ford, Hafliger, Leahy, and Richards
MOMENT OF SILENCE FOR REFLECTION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Notification from City Clerk Maurice Armster of
deputizing Pamela L. Lee to serve as Deputy City Clerk.
(Receive and File).
II. BUDGET WORKSHOP SESSION
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by: Seconded by: Action:
adjourn to Thursday, June 27, 1991 Special Meeting,
at 6:30 p.m.
Vote:
Meeting adjourned at:
Next regular City Council meeting July 2, 1991
7:30 p.m. at 625 S. Pico Avenue
TO:
FROM:
SUBJ:
DATE:
MEMO
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
Pamela Easter, City Manager
MEASURE "A" - LOCAL STREET AND ROADS PROGRAM
June 27, 1991
Each year the Riverside County Transportation Commission requests
that we develop and submit a plan for the expenditure of Measure
"A" Funds for the new Fiscal Year as well as for the following
four years.
Last Year our program included $450,000.00 for the reconstruction
of Esplanade Avenue and $100,000 for design of the Ramona
Expressway from Seventh Street to the southerly City limits.
Available funds for this year are only $225,693.00 and for the
period of 1992-1996 are only $1,272,254.00
The recommended program is attached. Fiscal Year 1991 funds in
the amount of $234,000.00 have been carried over to fund the
Esplanade Avenue reconstruction project. Fiscal Year 1992 funds
are proposed for a 50% match on the rehabilitation of the Ramona
Expressway between Sanderson Avenue and Chase Street. The other
50% is expected to be provided through the State-Local
Transportation Partnership Program. The FY 1993-1996 funds are
programmed for construction of the Ramona Expressway between
Seventh Street and the south City limits. State-Local
Transportation funds for this project have also been requested.
Recommended action is to approve the Fiscal Year 1992-1996
Measure "A" Local Streets and Roads Programs and authorize
the City Manager to forward the program to the Riverside County
Transportation Commission.
PAMELA S. EASTER
City Manager
PROJECT NAMES/LIMITS ITEM NO, I TOTAL RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE "A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1992 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 1 of 1 Prepared By: Les Evals Date: June 25, 1991 PROJECT TYPE Esplanade Avenue Ramna Expressway Sanderson to Chase TOTAL COST ($1,000's) MEASURE "A" FUNDS ($1,000'S) $236* Reconstruction $825 Reconstruction $450 $225
RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEASURE ^A" LOCAL FUNDS PROGRAM FY 1992-1996 Agency: City of San Jacinto Page 1 of 1 Prepared By: Les Eva ns Date: June 25, 1991 ITEM NO. PROJECT NAMES/LIMITS $1047 Ramona Expressway- Seventh to Southerly City limits ( Construction) TOTAL $1047 MEASURE "AN FUNDS ($1,000)
TnOmi,F,
J,M ES A.
ervcRLY
COX, COX & CAMPER
A PROE5SION4L. CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
80g EAST FLORIDA AVENUE
HEM CT, CALIFORNIA -4343
TELEPHONE
AREA C:„%f7E 714
652-1400
F Ax (714) ese..-zo
June 24, 1991
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Jim Cox
Re; OK & Associates.
Request for Cost of Living Adjustment
Th franchise agreement with OK & Associ
a
t
e
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
t
h
a
t
a
c
o
s
t
of living adjustment may be made at the
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
,
each anniversary of the contract after
1
9
8
8
.
T
h
e
a
d
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
i
s
t
o
be effective 30 days following the requ
e
s
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
.
W
e
received OK's request for the increase
i
n
e
a
r
l
y
J
u
n
e
.
T
h
e
y
r
e
-
quested that the increase be retroactive
t
o
t
h
e
a
n
n
i
v
e
r
s
a
y
i
n
M
a
y
,
however, we have denied retroactivity as
n
o
t
i
n
c
o
n
f
o
r
m
i
t
y
w
i
t
h
the contract terms.
have calculated the increase only u
p on that portion of the charge attributable to OK'S service ( t
h
a
t
i
s
,
n
o
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
County dump fees.) The increase in fees
i
s
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
e
d
a
s
f
0
1
1
o
w
s
:
PRIOR
CPI
NEW
RESID.
9.11
.34
MULTI.
8.88 „1
CU.YD.
5.14
.19
33
COMMER. BARREL
41.45 10.46
1.58 .39
4 3.03 10.85
These increalses are based upon he LA
-
L
O
N
G
B
E
A
C
H
C
o
n
s
u
m
e
r
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
from Maly 1990 to May 1991, showing an increa
s
e
o
t
- 4.6%.
Respectfully Subftlitted,
7
James A . Cox /
RESOLUTION NO. (C19(9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING RATES FOR
THE COLLECTION OF GARBAGE AND RUBBISH COLLECTED
WITHIN OR BY THE SAID CITY OF SAN JACINTO
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. This resolution supersedes Resolution No. 1928,
adopted the 22nd day of January, 1991.
Section 2. For the privilege of having garbage and rubbish
collected not less than twice during each calendar week, there
shall be assessed and charged:
(a) For the owner or occupant of residences: $9.75 per month.
(b) For the owner or operator of multiple unit dwellings each
having kitchen facilities: $9.75 per month for the first
unit and $9.19 for each additional units regardless
whether occupied or not.
(c) For the owner or operator of any commercial
establishment, except as set forth in sub-paragraph (d)
below, the following charges shall be assessed:
(i) Bin service shall be at the rate of $5.33 per cubic
yard of volume of the bin container maintained at
each establishment, with a minimum 2 yard charge.
This rate shall be for once-per-week service at a 2
yard container rate of $43.03 per month.
) Commercial barrel service shall be $10.85 per month
for twice-weekly service.
(d) Mobilehome parks having refuse picked up at each space
but the fees are billed to and paid by the operator shall
be charged on the same basis as sub-paragraph (a) above.
Other Mobilehome parks shall be charged the commercial
rate if refuse is collected at central locations or the
residential rates for individual collection with
individual billing and payment pursuant to sub-paragraph
(a) above.
(e) The City Council may provide that rubbish not included
within the definition of either "garbage" or "waste", as
provided in Section 13.68.010 of the Municipal Code be
collected by the City for such charge the City Manager or
other officer of the Contracting Party so authorized by
the City Council may determine to be fair and proper in
each individual case.
For extra dump requests: $30.00 for all sizes of cubic
yard bins.
Section 3. This rate resolution shall become effective for
the trash and refuse billing, effective July 1, 1991.
Section 4. The City Council does so resolve pursuant to
the authority vested in it by the provisions of Section 13.68.140
of the San Jacinto Municipal Code.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of July, 1991.
Francis R. Boykin, Mayor
ATTEST:
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
Deputy
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
S S
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
I, Maurice Amster, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly
and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto at a Regular Meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of July,
1991, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Deputy
(SEAL)
I, Maurice Amster, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do
hereby further certify that this is a full, true and correct copy
of Resolution No.
WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL this day of
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
Deputy
(SEAL)
FAX NO:
COX, COX & CAMPER
A Professional Corporation
Attorneys at Law
805 East Florida Avenue
Hemet, California 92343
(714) 652-1400
FAX #: (714) 652-3990
FAX TRANSMITTAL
TRANSMITTING PAGES, INCLUDING COVER SHEET
NOTE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FAX MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED
ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE
READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE
EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE TO DELIVER IT TO THE INTENDED
RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION,
DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR,
PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL
MESSAGE TO US AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE.
THANK YOU.
IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE TELEPHONE (714) 652-1400
AND ASK FOR PAT.
Honorable Mayp
Pamela S. Eatte
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Addendum Items to Agenda of 7/2/91 Council Mtg.
July 1, 1991
ADDENDUM
Please be advised that one Agenda item was inadvertently omitted
from the Agenda for our meeting tomorrow night, July 2, 1991.
The item, to be added under "ORAL COMMUNICATIONS," will be item
4.2. The subject to be covered will be Soboba Springs Village #4.
This matter is a continuation of our June 18 Council Meeting.
Another item that has been requested to be added is under "CITY
DEPARTMENTS," as 5.3 and the subject to be covered is Ed Meyerson
Request for Water Service.
Staff regrets the one omission and appreciates you allowing us to
add these two items to our Agenda.
MEMORANDUM
City Treasurer sell Leahy TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
. Easter
June 25, 1991
City Councilmember Request for
Information on Investments
At the June 18 Council meeting, Councilman Richards asked for
information on why we do not invest in local banks. If not with
our large amounts, at least with amounts of $100,000. I suggested
that you make a presentation on this issue at the next regular
Council meeting (July 2), so that the Council could be better
informed on the matter.
If you have any questions on this or if this is not a convenient
date/time, please feel free to contact me.
is
CC: Mayor Boykin
Councilman Richards
Pam Lee, Deputy City Clerk
Anna Vega
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CALL:
Gary L. Orso (714) 275-6250
or Assistant County Assessor
Rex L. Jackson (714) 275-6234
Gary L. Orso, Assessor
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, CA 92501-3659
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Assessor Gary L. Orso announced today that the 1991-92 Assessment Roll of
locally assessed property in Riverside County rose to $66,751,358,811, up $7,115,234,748
or 11.9%, over last year's comparable figure of $59,636,124,063. Under current law,
properties in California are assessed at 100% of full value.
After property tax exemptions are deducted from the new Roll totals, the "net
taxable" assessed value for 1991-92 is 12.2% higher than the comparable figure for last
year. (See attached County totals sheet.)
Orso said that the values on the 1991-92 Assessment Roll were determined under
the provisions of Proposition 13 and Proposition 8 approved by the voters in 1978, and
under implementing legislation passed by the Legislature since 1978. Under Proposition
13, the base year value of individual properties is changed only when there is a change
in ownership or when new construction takes place. For properties that have not had any
change in ownership or any new construction, additions or alterations, a two per cent
inflation factor has been added for 1991-92. The two per cent factor reflects the
percentage change in the California Consumer Price Index as provided by law. The
Assessor has recognized declines in value under Proposition 8 when properties have
been damaged or destroyed as well as in situations where values have declined for
economic reasons.
According to the Assessor, the 1991-92 Assessment Roll increase will generate
more than $70 million in added property tax revenues for public agencies over the 1990-
91 total. The County, cities, school districts, and special districts will all benefit from this
increase. Orso added that the 12% increase was phenomenal considering the downturn
statewide in the real estate market during the past year.
LOCAL ROLL RIVERSIDE COUNTY L91:2,41:3 TO 1.591792' (Expressed ii 100% Frg Valle) _ - , category 1962/83 1983/84 1964/85 1985/38 1986/87 1387/85 1985/59 1989/90 1990191 1991/92 - LAND: I 7,834,123,666! 8,372,018,277J 9,260,865,3591 10,370,679230 11,919,4.95,788 13,219,728,634 15,004752,2161 17,609,382949l 21,819,853,089j 24,639,8.85.741 I PROVE E 6: 1 12,415 168225 120437 1581 13,413,857,901 1 3029351 004 14,327,227,106 4536484598 16,971,974422 1 6617241727 19,185,006,2081 18765081988 22,227,366,0231 217868721561 24,974,986,870 I 2451 52283341 29,302,126,908 28757571827 34,94-5,138,751 34368639949 39.091,910.4-29 Strrctires I Firtxrcl 1 284133052 290201595 284250950 1 2705795201 326066603 343383757 I 375630715 461343858 I 4.966.43992 575577' ev & %Tina i___ 87283592 94305302 1074915581 84153175 1 9335,6617 I 96910110 8-4123321 I 31011223 1 81854810 87830 PERSONAL PROPERTY: n 220,362,573 233,408,747 239,866,9301 25.9,628,465 278,868,261 320,208,843 436,588,370 475,956,930 I 518,315,78.3 307,087, laver tory I 2208625731 233406747 I 239666930! 259628455 278868261 I 32020884.3 4365883701 I 475956360 5183 57831 507087 90 Other I TOTAL SECURED 20,470,154,4-64 1 22,019,282,925 24,427,759,395 27,602,282,117 30,383,369,257 35,767,303,560 I 40,414,329,466 47,387,466,8171 57282,307,633 64,22.8,883,360 LAND: I 1,742,288 1 2,689,851 .1 2,661,318 4,789,031 1 4,207,075 1 6,114,8401 6,513,435! 12,032,4.271 20,631,382 I 18,491,289 IMPROVEMENTS: 310,473,222 1 357,762,9221 3749 I 395,503,477 358682661 527,9194051 501750591 827,894,755 66196925 1 928,299,6631 79-8605921 906,975,2001 946932771 1,010,296,572 1 129.482170 1 1,070,905,9751 174-6404-641 ,118,640,6-48 146229502 Str tires 1 6868 Fixt Ere: • 1 31046454 1 357759173 1 359E35211 1 4777443461 7616978301 8484392771 812281 923 I saosi4402 I 896265511 I 97241114-6 PERSONAL PROPERTY: 437,043,9831 460,703,6031 576,127,8751 630,377,2901 6.91,031,8601 876,966,7901 1,067,449,3661 1143,296,411 1 1,261,279,073 1 1,375,343.514 Isrextory I I I 1 1 I 1 Orier - I 437043963 I 749259,493 4607036031 821,156,3761 5761 875 1 974,4.92,6701 6303772901 1,163,085,7261 €910.11 aso I 1,523,133,690 876906790 1 ,811 ,323,493 I 1067449666 1 1,980,938,5011 1143286411 1 2,165,625,410! 126127 73 1 2,352,816.4301 137534351.1 2,512,473, TOTAL UNSECURED 1-- TOTAL SECURED & UNSECURED f 21,2 ,413,957 22,840,439 25,402,252,065 28,765,367,8431 32,506,502,947 37,578,627,05.91 42,395,267,9571 49,553,092227 ,636,124,063 ,751,358 13.0% 7.6% 112% 13_2% 13.0% 15.6% 12.8% 16_9% 20.3% 112%
iIDE mum: 1991/92 LOCAL ROLL SECURED AND UNSECURED - EXCLUDING STATE ASSESSED PROPERTIES CATEGORY SECURED UN SECURED TOTAL VALUE CHANGE PERCENTAGE CHANGE 1991192 1990191 1991192 1993191 1991192 1990/91 LAND 24.639,885,74 21,819,8 099 1 18,491,239 20,631,382 24,658,377,030 21,840,4.84,481 2,817,892,549 I 123% IMPROVEMENTS: STRUCTURES 38,428,502,350 575,577,892 87,830,187 507,087,190 34,366,639,949 496,643,992 81,854,810 518,315,783 146,229,502 972,411,14.6 0 1,375,343,514 174,640,464 896,265,511 0 1,261,279,073 38,574,731,852 1,547,989,038 87,830,187 1,882,430,704 34,541,230,413 1,394909,503 81,854,810 1,779,594,856 4,033,451,439 155,079,535 5,975,377 102,835,848 11.7% 11.1% 7.3% 5.8% FIXTURES TREES & VINES - PERSONAL PROPERTY i TOTAL 64 238,883 360 57 233 307 633 2.512,475.451 1354816,430 65,751,358,8111 59,636,124,063 7,115,234,74-8 11.9% 11.111111.111.111111111. LESS:N.R.EXEMPTIONS 1.152.326,085 63,086,557,275 1.359,44-0,152 1,098,970,927 56,184,336,706 1,292,790.993 35,903.547 1 2,476,571,904 0 34,413,091 2,318,403,339 0 1,18.8,229,632 65,563,129,179 1,359,440,152 1,133,38.4,018 58,532,74-0,045 1,297,790,993 54 845 614 4.8% NET TANGIBLE 70.' 89 134 12.1% 61 649,159 4.8% 1111111111.11111111.1.111111 LESS: HOX i NET TAXABLE F 61 727 117,131 54 836,545 713 2,476,571 904 2,318,403,339 64 203 689,027 1 5720-4 949 052 6,998.739,975 12.2%
ASSESSED VALUE FOR CITIES 1991/92 CITY TOTAL . 1991192— LOCAL ROLL LESS NON-REIMBURSED EXEMPTIONS NET TANGIBLE VALUE LESS HOMEOWNER'S EXEMPTIONS 1991/42 NET TAXABLE VALUE 11101/1 -_-_— NET TAXABLE VALUE ASSESSED - VALUE - CHANGE PERCENTAGE CHANGE BANNING 679,403,764 7,526, 24 111111EMES111.1112= 644,540,516 1111111112221 BEAUMONT 322,404,130 4,052111 11111111=111111111112231 36 tr5-7&,..“ MISES 23 200,530 111111111111111 BLITHE 205,505,2/6 7.1.49,170 11111111222111.11MEI 119,9943,207 171,007,767 11,9/2,440 1 11_1% CATHEDRAL CITY 1,540,971,516 6,531,705 1,574,431,141 26,441, 429 COACH 1A, 333,663,317 7,949,422 375,713,395 1,949'6" l CORONA 4,992,205,631 42,261,051 4,909,937,514 11,647,35S 4,121,270,722 4,719-523,677 601,344,545 14.4% DESERT HOT STRINGS 417,601,965 5,977,713 411,671,697 11,551,4-00 Lao m,7 367,605,7'11 37,515,544 10_3% HEMET 1,633,074,114 26,654,005 1,604,422,179 55,402,600 1,550,619,579 1,321-,553,344 722,066,195 16.7% INDIAN WELLS 1,757,375,409 612934 1,754,712,429 6,074,000 1,754,634,429 1,544,167,900 702,444.529 13.1% IND 10 1,124,671,206 24,907,479 1,091,771,727 72031,713 1,074,769,944 199,134,302 74,931,642 LAKE ELSINORE 9/2,645,242 5,761,152 976,1*4,090 15,593,144 961,290,5404 740,374,341 110,416,543 23.1% LA QUINTA 1,594,576,712 3,645,129 1,590,970,193 13,941,200 1,577,029,613 1,270,411,479 304,544,214 MORENO VALLEY 5,113,934,091 22314,524 5,091,619,567 124,075,526 4,945,544,041 4,413,935,163 551,641,171 12-5% NORCO • 151,040,47 4,466,091 1-42,574,309 26,971,117 115,602,422 743,644,409 71,934,01.3 PALM DESERT . 3,440,771,314 51,755,442 3,311,022,472 34,224,506 „79 109,991,342 244,119,064 7-9 PALM SPRINGS 4,054,415,170 61,961,617 3,994,454,173 52,477,252 3,941,476,141 3,723,190,062 211,214,119 --- 5-9% 1,034,006,445 7,30.4,307 1,030,691,171 73,331,939 1,007,366,239 3.35,10,651 172,176,514 20.6% RANCHO GE 2,794,495,041 1 ,035,94* 2,6(8,969,193 17,279,201 , 19,992 2,334,135,143 4,115,925•74 449,442,474 237,554,149 113,254,912 IIIIIIIIEEEMIIIIIIIIIEI 10-1% 24.1% RIVERSIDE 9,631,135,451 441,352.534 9,150,712,922 232,325,624 4,914,457,294 SAN IACINTO 607,540,177 7,451,140 600,121,337 17,406,311 542,721,956 TEMECULA EEEIIIIIIIII256,621,215 2622,099,121 10,04,190 2,611,204,231 34,762,200 7,510,442,031 2,192,653,071 347,790,960 17.7% 5,129,453 251,547,612 9,394,754 242,112,151 201,119,090 41,923,744 CANTON LAKE 617,334,552 1,513,661 645,111,01 - 13,772,214 472,046,677 614,149,244 57,157,4 MURRIETA 2,017,547,21 15,015,64.4 2002,411, 147 21,353,356 1,973,123,531 1,517,434,151 345,03,373 24_3% TOTALS 41,75-4, 510, 4541 2,054,907,554 f, 47,699, 472,900 903,176,3 01 44,795,791,799 41,599,137,7111! 5,194,651,01 ,1 1990-51 FIGURES FOR CA_LIMESA, CANTON LAKE, AND MURRIETA ARE PRIOR TO INCORPORATION
Tfl 11-4, CO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND SELECTED ELEMENTARY DLSTRICTS 1991192 PERCENTAGE CHANGE _. DISTRICT NET TANGIBLE VALUE LESS HOMEOWNER'S EXEMPTIONS 1991192 NET TAXABLE VALUE • 1190f91 NET TAXABLE VALUE --- ASSESSED VALUE CHANGE ALVORD UNIFIED 2759,797,574 69,244,559 2694,551,015 2454,535,741 240,015,247 93% BANNING UNIFIED 474,112,274 23,510,119 652,04,057 567,644,112 44513,739 15.e% BEAUMONT UNIFIED 92 6,245,131 32,720,647 *93,525,124 791,170547 93,654,617 11.7% COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED • 1,324,964,270 - 15,134,666 1,305,134,204 1,016,171,771 209,651,426 191% COLTON MINT UN IFIED 14,359,071 1,043,000 47,316,071 35,796,4-42 11,519,629 322% CORONAINORCO UNIFIED 6,629,232,795 130,341,191 6,499,573,904 5,244,324,345 419,S99 11.9% DESERT CENTER UNIFIED 3.6,143,472 9,614,791,545 391,275 111,459,993 35,771,603, 33,452,927 9,575,331,592 1,511,956,034 1,511,416 976,372556 5.7% - 11.4% DESERT SANDS UNIFIED HEMET UNIFIED 4,075,264,162 13-4.914,543 3.94-013,275 3,495,332,141 444,943, 127% JURUPA UNIFIED 2451,437,411 70,671,715 2340,765,703 2100,112,032 279,947,671 133% LASE ELSINORE UNIFIED 3,027,/72,406 71,747,513 2156,124,03 2,615,177,344 340,947,547 13.0% hi ORENO VALLEY UNIFE.-D 4,156,735,341 119,442,400 4,737,332_92s 4,245,770,716 491,542,772 11.6% WURRIETA UNIFIED 2,109,772,359 35,500,156 2774,272.203 2.311,459,75-0 455.112,453 19.7% PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED 9,079,936,904 121,011,445 1,951,975,415 170,141,014 721,044,401 9.4% PALO VERDE UNIFIED 422,970,091 12,193,792 76,076 432,275,431 31,150,669 7_3% RIVERSIDE UNIFIED 7,617,640,125 195,912325 7,491,657,100 A35,491,410 455,957,990 9.6% SAN 3ACINTO UNIFIED s42,e44,257 21,072911 441,013,774 649,374,033 151,439,243 22_0% TEMECULA UNIFIED 3,457.952,062 39,229,609 3,411,662462 3,023,032,453 395,630,099 13.1% YUCAIPA UNIFIED 113,049,30 7,135,304 175914,00 159.396,422 14,517,241 10.4% VAL VERDE UNIFIED 501,924,917 14,771,446 495,213,451 415134,539 79,771,512 19.1% MEN IFEE SCHOOL 1,554,362,120 59,521,170 1,491,139554 1,291,441,145 2043,434,065 15.4% Pi UV LEW SCHOOL 311,145,924 2,342,473 302137,453 257125141 45,712,772 17 PERRIS SCHOOL 135,217,444 75,432,126 109,715,334 677,273.500 131,911,134 19.5% ROMO LAND SCHOOL 422,1-65,615 15,919,262 412_946,353 362069,214 50,177,139 14.1% VA!. VERDE sCHOOL _ 440,559,507 i 14,971,919 24 5,540,512 710,211,491 135,341,677 19.1% [DISTRICT TOTALS 45,563,129,179 1,359,440,152 44,203,649,027 57,204,949,052 4,9-91,739,975 122% . - _ VA.L VERDE SCHOOL AND vAL VERDE UN IT ESTMAITED FOR 1990-91