HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 4/16/1991AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
AND THE COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
625 South Pico, San Jacinto
DATE: April 16, 1991
TIME: 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL: Boykin, Ford, Hafliger, Leahy, Rose
MOMENT OF SILENCE FOR REFLECTION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
I. CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be
routine and will be enacted by one motion by the City Council in
the form listed.
There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the
motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public
requests specified items to be removed and/or discussed.
Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come
forward upon invitation of the Mayor, state their name, address,
and the Consent Calendar item number.
A. Approval of Minutes of April 2, 1991.
B. Approval of Warrant Nos. 24794 through 24916, as
submitted by the Finance Director.
C. Award of Contract to the Nadel Partnership, Inc. for
Master Planning Services for area east of San
Jacinto Avenue, between Esplanade and Commonwealth.
(Staff recommends approval.)
April 16, 1991 Agenda
Page 2
D. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1953
A Resolution of the City of San Jacinto to authorize
advance and investment of funds to Special
Assessment District No. 87-1.
(City Attorney recommends approval.)
E. Financial Report of Activity for period ending March
31, 1991, as submitted by Finance Director.
(Receive and file.)
F. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1954
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto to support the San Jacinto Chamber of
Commerce/Military Affairs Committee with their
efforts to retain the 943rd Tactical Airlift Group
at March A.F.B.
(Staff recommends approval.)
G. Request for maternity leave of absence, without pay,
from Grace Martinez, Account Clerk I, from April 8
through approximately May 21, 1991. (Staff
recommends approval.)
H. Contract with John Carl Warnecke & Associates.
Authorization for City Manager to suspend contract
with architectural firm.
I. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1955
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto establishing Interim Park Standards for the
City.
(Staff recommends adoption.)
J. Change Order Nos. 1 & 2
Western Landscaping Construction
Project: CFD #2 - Phase I
Change Ord. No. 1 - Reduction in contract price as
a result in a change of valves in order to receive -
an extended warranty for the controller system
(reduction of $7,122.00 to total contract.)
Change Ord. No. 2 - Repair of erosion caused by rain
(increase of $27,644.00 to total contract.)
(Staff recommends approval of Change Orders No. 1
& 2)
2
April 16, 1991 Agenda
Page 3
K. Change order No. 6
Matich Corporation
Project: CFD #2 - Phase I
Change Ord. No. 6 - Repair of streets caused by rain
(increase of $18,264.00.)
(Staff recommends award of bid to Matich Corporation
and consider contract as Change Order No. 6)
L. Amendment to Tract 26020-1
Applicant: Rice-Young Pacific
Location: between Evans and Shaver, west
Mountain Avenue.
Proposal to amend configuration of twr: 23t-,
(Staff recommends approval.)
M. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda pursuant
to City Attorney.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to
approve consent calendar items A through M and adopt
Resolution Nos. 1953, 1954 and 1955 and waive the
readings in full.
Vote:
PUBLIC HEARINGS (A through D continued from April 2, 1991
and E continued from March 5, 1991.)
A. Environmental Impact Assessment and Tentative Tract
Maps 24050, 24051, 24052, 24053, 24054, 24055,
24056, 24057, 26426, 24627
Applicant: PR Equities
Location: approximately 600 feet east of Hewitt -
Street, north of Washington Avenue, west of Meridian
Street, south of Esplanade Avenue and Commonwealth
Avenue
3
April 16, 1991 Agenda
Page 4
Proposal for 10 subdivisions within Specific Plan
2-88 for a total of 883 lots on approximately 181.69
acres. (Applicant recommends continuance.)
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to
continue to meeting of May 21, 1991.
Vote:
B. Adoption of fees for processing of various
development applications.
Motion Seconded by: T,otion!
Vote:
C. Establishment of Park Fees
Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 932
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, a California municipality, establishing
regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees,
or both, for park and recreation land in
subdivisions and on single parcels and the repeal
of Ordinance No. 596.
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to
introduce Ordinance No. 932 to second reading and
wa.ivc the reading in full.
Vote:
D. Proposed removal of weeds, rubbish and refuse
Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1950
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, overruling objections and determining to
proceed with abatement.
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to
Vote:
4
April 16, 1991 Agenda
Page 5
E. North Mountain Project
1. General Plan Amendment 1-91 and Change of Zone
2-91
Motion by:
to
Vote:
Seconded by: Action:
2. Surface Mining
Motion by: Seconded by:
to
Vote:
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
A. Request for waiver of fees for Kiwanis Club Circus
at Valley Wide on May 9, 1991 - John Muehring
IV. CITY DEPARTMENTS
A. Ramona Days/Cinco de Mayo - Councilwoman Leahy and
Henry Garcia
B. Exploration of Joint Public Safety Facilities with
the City of Hemet - Pamela Easter, Joe Kozma and
Ross Chadwick
C. 2010 Committee - Pamela Easter
5
April 16, 1991 Agenda
Page 6
V .
MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
A. Certificates of Appreciation - Councilwoman Leahy
B. Pumper's Association:
Mayor Boykin
Appointment of Delegate -
VI. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Pending Litigation
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to go into Executive Session for the discussion of pending
litigation.
Vote: Time:
Motion by: Seconded by:
return to Regular Session.
Vote: Time:
Action: to
VII. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by: Seconded by:
Action: to
adjourn to May 7, 1991 at 7:30 p.m.
Vote: Time:
Next regular City Council meeting May 7, 1991.
6
7:30 PM.
For
AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OP THE SAU JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
t-TT AGENCY
Rose
DGE
There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the
motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public
requests specified items to be removed and/or discussed.
Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come
forward upon invitation of the Mayor, state their name, address,
and the Consent Calendar item number.
A. Approval of Minutes of April 2, 1991.
B. Approval of Warrant Nos. 24794 through 24916, as
submitted by the Finance Director.
C. Award of Contract to the Nadel Partnership, Inc. for
Master Planning Services for area east of San
Jacinto Avenue, between Esplanade and Commonwealth.
(Staff recommends approval.)
3.• 199H ; submitted by
(Receive and file.)
Fj
riding March
Director.
April 16, 1991 Agenda
Page 2
D. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1953
A Resolution of the City of San Jacinto to authorize
advance., and investment of funds to Special
F. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1954
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto to support the San Jacinto Chamber of
Commerce/Mility Affairs Committee with theii -
efforts to retri the 943rd Tactical Airlift Group
at March A.F.E .
(Staff recommen -1.)
G. for maternity leave of absence, without pay,
Grace Martinez, Account Clerk I, from April 8
approximately May 21, 1991. (Staff
recommends approval.)
He Contract with John CE -7 7777necke & Associates.
Authorization for City :-Inager to suspend contract
with architectural firm.
I. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1955
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto establishing Interim Park Standards for the
City.
(Staff recommends adoption.)
J. Change Order Nos. 1 & 2
Western Landscaping Construction
Project: CFD #2 - Phase I
Change Ord. No. 1 - Reduction in contract price as
a result in a change of valves in order to receive
an extended warranty for the controller system
(reduction of $7,122.00 to total contract.)
Change Ord. No. 2 - Repair of erosion caused by rain
(increase of $27,644.00 to total contract.)
(Staff recommends approval of Change Orders No.
& 2)
2
April 16, 1991 Agenda
Page 3
K. Change order No. 6
Matich Corporation
Project: CFD #2 - Phase I
Change Ord. No. 6 - Repair of streets caused by rain
(inc2:-2,se of $17,264.00.)
_ ward of bid to Matich Corporation
a1e."3 con_ 'tract as Change Order No. 6)
L. Amendment to Tract 26020-1
Applicant: Rice-Young Pacific
Location: between Evans and Shaver, west
Mountain Avenue.
Proposal to amen:: configuration of two (2) lo*Lf5
(Staff recommends approval.)
M. nec of D
to C 2 ty Atte
ion of Posting Agenda pursuant
END OF C.I•SENT CI
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to
approve consent calendar items A through M and adopt
Resolution Nos. 1953, 1954 and 1955 and waive the
readings in full.
Vote:
PUBLIC HEARINGS (A through D continued from Apri
and E continued from March 5, 1991.)
A. Environmental Impact Assessment and Tentative Tract
Maps 24050, 24051, 24052, 24053, 24054, 24055,
24056, 24057, 26426, 24627
Applicant: PR Equities
Location: approximately 600 feet east of Hewitt
Street, north of Washington Avenue, west of Meridian
Street, south of Esplanade Avenue and Commonwealth
Avenue
3
April 16, 1991 Agenda
Page 4
Proposal for 10 subdivisions within Specific Plan
2-88 for a total of 883 lots on approximately 131.69
acres. (Applicant recommends continuance.)
Motion by:__
continue to
Vote:
Seconded by:
:ing of May 21, 1991.
Action:
B. Adoption of fees for processing of various
development applications.
l‘ro -cion by: Seconded by: Acton:
Vote:
C. Establishment of Park Fees
Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 932
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, a California municipality, establishing
regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees,
or both, for park and recreation land in
subdivisions and on single parcels and the repeal
of Ordinance No. 596.
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to
introduce Ordinance No. 932 to second reading and
waive the reading in full.
Vote:
D. Proposed removal of weeds, rubbish and refuse
Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1950
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, overruling objections and determining to
proceed with abatement.
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to
Vote:
4
April 16, 1991 -Agenda
Page 5
E. North Mountain Project
1. General Plan Amendment 1
2-91
and Change of Zone
Motion by:
to
Seconded by: on:
Vote:
2. Surface Mining
Motion by:
to
Vote:
Seconf3e ,3„ by: Action:
ORAL COMM3LICATIONS
A. Request for waiver of fees for Kiwanis Club Circus
at Valley Wide on May 9, 1991 - John Muehring
IV. CITY DEPARTMENTS
A. Ramona Days/Cinco de Mayo - Councilwoman Leahy and
Henry Garcia
B. Exploration of Joint Public Safety Facilities with
the City of Hemet - Pamela Easter, Joe Kozma and
Ross Chadwick
C. 2010 Committee - Pamela Easter
5
April 16, 1991 Agenda
Page 6
V. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
A. Certificates of Appreciation - Councilwoman Leahy
B. Pumper's Association: Appointment of Delegate -
Mayor Boykin
VI. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Pending Litigation
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to go
into Executive Session for the discussion of pending
litigation.
Vote: Time:
Motion by: Seconded by: Action:
return to Regular Session.
Vote: Time:
VII. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by: Seconded by:
Action: to
adjourn to May 7, 1991 at 7:30 p.m.
Vote: Time:
Next regular City Council meeting May 7, 1991.
6
MINUTES
San Jacinto City Council
and the Council Sitting as
the Redevelopment Agency
and Industrial Development Authority
Regular Adjourned Meeting
April 2, 1991
The regular meeting of the San Jacinto City Council, the Council
sitting as the Redevelopment Agency and Industrial Development
Authority was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Boykin at the
Community Center, 625 S. Pico Avenue.
Roll Call - Present: Councilmen Boykin, Ford, Hafliger, and
Councilwoman Leahy
Absent: Councilman Rose (excused)
Staff Members - City Manager Easter, Community
Development Director McNabb, Finance Director Vega,
Police Chief Kozma, Fire Chief Chadwick, Water
Superintendent Townsel and City Attorney Cox.
Moment of Silence for Reflection
Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Boykin.
I. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of Minutes of March 19 and 26, 1991.
B. Approval of Warrant Nos. 24696 through 24793, as
submitted by the Finance Director.
C. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1947
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California, supporting an "Inland Empire"
postmark for mail processed at the San Bernardino
General Mail Facility. (Staff recommends approval.)
D. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1949
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California, granting tentative approval of -
cancellation of agricultural preserve contract.
(Staff recommends adoption).
1
April 2, 1991 Minutes
Page 2
E. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1951
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto extending the use of Angle Parking on
portions of Main Street. (City Attorney recommends
approval.)
F. Award of Contract to the Nadel Partnership, Inc. for
Master Planning Services for area east of San
Jacinto Avenue, between Esplanade and Commonwealth.
(Staff recommends approval.)
G. Approval of Physical Fitness Program for City
Employees. (Staff recommends approval.)
H. Delegation of authorization to develop an Economic
Development-related to the Economic Development
Council Committee Brochure. (Staff recommends
approval.)
I. Authorization to proceed with Worker's Compensation
Agreement with the Coachella Valley Joint Powers
Insurance Authority (Wear & Wood) and cancel
Agreement with Bierly & Associates, effective July
1, 1991. (Staff recommends approval.)
J. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1952
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California, ordering the annexation of
certain uninhabited territory to the City of San
Jacinto (Annexation No. 63).
(Staff recommends approval.)
K. Time Deposit Registers for period ending March 31,
1991. (Receive and file.)
L. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda pursuant
to City Attorney.
Mayor Boykin stated that Item F. was being pulled, at request of
Staff, to be brought back at the next Council meeting.
Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to approve consent calendar items A
through L, with the exclusion of Item F., adopting Resolution Nos.
1947, 1949, 1951, and 1951, and waive the readings in full.
Seconded by Councilman Ford
Motion carried: 4-0.
2
April 2, 1991 Minutes
Page 3
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Environmental Impact Assessment and Tentative Tract
Maps 24050, 24051, 24052, 24053, 24054, 24055,
24056, 24057, 26426, 24627
Applicant: PR Equities
Location: approximately 600 feet east of Hewitt
Street, north of Washington Avenue, west of Meridian
Street, south of Esplanade Avenue and Commonwealth
Avenue
Proposal for 10 subdivisions within Specific Plan
2-88 for a total of 883 lots on approximately 181.69
acres. (Planning Commission recommends approval.)
Mr. McNabb advised Council that the tract maps
included in the tentative tract map request are the
second phase of the Peacock Radaker Specific Plan.
The Public Hearing has been advertised, however,
there are a couple of issues that the developer has
discussed with Staff and would like to have resolved
with Staff prior to coming before City Council and
making a formal presentation. One of the items
relates to fire mitigation fees and the second is
the condition that relates to the schools.
Therefore, the applicant has asked that this map be
continued until the meeting of April 16, to allow
time to work through the two concerns.
The Mayor advised that the Public Hearing would not be opened as
there was no objection and the matter would be continued.
Motion by Councilman Ford to continue the Public Hearing on
Environmental Impact Assessment and Tentative Tract Maps 24050,
24051, 24052, 24053, 24054, 24055, 24056, 24057, 26426 and 24627
to April 16, 1991.
Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy.
Motion carried: 4-0.
B. Adoption of fees for processing of various development
applications.
The Mayor advised that Staff has requested the published Public
Hearing be continued until April 16, 1991.
3
April 2, 1991 Minutes
Page 4
-
Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to continue the Public Hearing until
April 16, 1991.
Seconded by Councilman Ford.
Motion carried: 4-0.
C. Establishment of Park Fees
Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 932
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, a California municipality, establishing
regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or
both, for park and recreation land in subdivisions and
on single parcels and the repeal of Ordinance Nc. 596.
A presentation by Brian McNabb, Community Development
Director, informed Council that the City had last
developed park fees in the late 1970's, when the Quimby
Act was created. At the same time the City also adopted
a resolution that set the fees and they still exist today
($.10/sq. foot of habitable area for housing units and
$.01/sq. foot of building area for non-residential
units.)
The General Plan of the City states that there should be
3 acres of park space for 1,000 people. This is based
on State Law. At the time of the General Plan adoption,
it was the desire that the City actually adopt a 5 acre
per 1,000 population standard. Ordinance No. 932 would
repeal Ordinance No. 596 and re-establish park fees at
other than a set rate per square footagc. It would be
based on the varying number of dwelling units. This
formula is the same as Valley Wide Park and Recreation
uses for the unincorporated areas of the City. Sam
Goepp, General Manager of Valley Wide Park District, is
of the opinion that the City could actually count, for
the purposes of park fees, the existence of Valley Wide
Regional Park in the City as existing park space for the
purpose of establishing what the actual ratio of acres
of park per thousand people could be. Mr. McNabb did not
have time to further explore this possibility prior to
the meeting and advised that Staff recommends continuing
the public hearing to April 16, 1991, to allow Staff time
to pursue the possibility of including Valley Wide in the
formula.
4
April 2, 1991 Minutes
Page 5
City Attorney Cox questioned page 4, section 9, as to who
would bear the cost of the appraisal required prior to
the filing of the final map. He stated, with Staff
confirming, that the applicant was to pay the expense and
suggested including additional language at the end of
sentence 1, Section 9, page 4, to read, "at applicant's
expense".
Councilman Hafliger inquired if it would not be a good
idea to have the developers establish the retention basin
areas, etc. for recreational use and would they count for
park space.
City Manager Easter advised Council that she and the
Community Development Director have added playground
equipment and a baseball diamond to the Peacock Radaker
project to see how it would work and utilize the feedback
from this test area.
Motion by Councilman Ford to continue Establishment of Park Fees
until April 16, 1991 to investigate the legality of changing land
dedication from 3 to 5 acres per 1,000 population.
Seconded by Councilman Hafliger.
Motion carried: 4-0.
D. Proposed removal of weeds, rubbish and refuse
Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1950
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, overruling objections and detelmining to
proceed with abatement.
Mayor Boykin advised the audience that Staff had requested the
public hearing and item be continued to April 16, 1991.
Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to continue to meeting of April 16,
1991.
Seconded by Councilman Ford.
Motion carried; 4-0.
5
April 2, 1991 Minutes
Page 6
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
A. Valley-Wide Youth Baseball Parade on April 13, 1991
Karen Robles
Karen Robles, representing Valley-Wide Youth
Baseball, came before Council to ask for permission
to have an Opening Day Parade on April 13, 1991, at
12:00 noon. Ms. Robles advised that all the
paperwork had been completed and given to the Police
Department.
Police Chief Kozma recommended that a route change
be considered going down State Street from Seventh
Street (the area of Agri Empire) over to Esplanade
and into the Valley Wide area. The Chief
recommended this revision as Esplanade Avenue is
pretty well beat up with ruts and holes. State
Street is a better highway and easier to block off
the traffic and divert it better.
Ms. Robles was advised by Staff that they would
assist her in establishing a staging area at 7th and
State.
Motion by Councilman Ford to approve parade and route from Seventh
and State (Agri Empire) proceeding south on State Street to
Esplanade Avenue and onto Valley Wide on April 13, 1991.
Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy.
Motion carried: 4-0.
B. L. Annie Garrett, 999 S. Santa Fe Avenue, came
before Council to ask for assistance in cleaning the
sand from Santa Fe Avenue to avoid a bicycle
accident. She additionally mentioned that cars park
in the bicycle zone and create a hazard. Ms.
Garrett mentioned the area was south on Santa Fe on
the west side. Mayor Boykin advised Ms. Garrett
that the area she is speaking of is not in the City
of San Jacinto. After the Mayor established from
the Police Chief and Community Development Director
where our City limits end, he advised Ms. Garrett
that the City of Hemet would need to be notified.
Police Chief Kozma advised Council that he would
contact the Hemet Public Works Director for
assistance in resolving the matter. The Mayor
additionally informed Ms. Garrett that unless the
6
April 2, 1991 Minutes
Page 7
bike zone states "No Parking", then parking is not
illegal in that area. Chief Kozma advised that it
is not a "Class 1 Bikeway".
IV. CITY DEPARTMENTS
A. Update on The Villas Water - John Townsel
John Townsel, Water Superintendent, advised Council
that the work at The Villas had been completed with
the exception of one (1) piece of concrete work
which had been delayed due to the rain.
B. Selection of Paramedic Committee - Ross Chadwick
(Request for continuance to May 7, 1991 lating)
Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to continue Selection of Paramedic
Committee until the meeting of May 7, 1991.
Seconded by Councilman Ford.
Motion carried 4-0.
C. Feedback from recent Refuse Mailer oral
presentation by Pamela S. Easter
City Manager Easter referred to the mailer sent to
all residents advising them of the increase in the
County tipping/dump fees that is being passed onto
them. Ms. Easter shared some of the feedback that
was recived, in writing and verbally, that maybe
Council should start looking at twice a week pick-
up and maybe we only want to do once a week pick-
up. The City Manager also advised that the Public
Works Committee was having ongoing discussions with
O.K. Associates on a couple of different matters and
the City could bring this issue up to them as well.
With their possible upcoming cost of living
increase, maybe there is a way we can negotiate
something.
Councilman Ford reminded that O.K. Associates
mentioned sometime back that they would like to
start recycling and that way the City would be able
to do a number of things and asked if we had heard
anymore from O.K.? City Manager Easter advised that
O.K. Associates say they are working on a recycling
program but nothing has been forthcoming at this
7
April 2, 1991 Minutes
Page 8
Councilwoman Leahy requested a time limit be set on
receiving O.K.'s proposal, so that others can also
be considered. Ms. Leahy also confirmed that the
City look into once a week pick-up if it will cut
the cost down.
Mayor Boykin noted seeing letters to the editor on
this subject and saw several for and several against
changing. The Mayor further noted that he hoped the
citizens do not expect the cost to be cut in half
as the same amount of refuse would still be hauled
from the City, whether it was once a week or twice
a week
City Manager Easter asked that the subject has been
brought up to see if Council wanted the City
Attorney and City Manager to pursue.
Councilman Ford stated that the contract with O.K.
would need to be changed to reflect once a week
pick-up.
City Manager Easter agreed and also advised that the
City was getting near the time of negotiation on a
cost of living increase for O.K. Associates and that
as there is a legal interpretation required in the
Contract, that the City Attorney is being requested
to look into this.
City Attorney Cox advised Council that O.K. has an
exclusive contract until June, 1993, and it would
be just a matter of renegotiating the terms.
Councilman Hafliger inquired if O.K. had stated they
would submit a recycling proposal and include a cost
per homeowner to allow for the extra pickup. City
Manager Easter confirmed. Councilman Hafliger
questioned whether it wouldn't be more efficient to
study the whole Valley for trash pick-up rather than
just a San Jacinto or Hemet project. He asked if
we could do this simultaneously, as O.K. prepares
a proposal for San Jacinto.
8
April 2, 1991 Minutes
Page 9
City Manager Easter advised that Hemet has given us
an initial indication that they would like to talk
to us about it. Ms. Easter asked City Attorney Cox
to respond to whether we have to wait for a proposal
from O.K. Associates.
City Attorney Cox said he felt that it was
appropriate to give O.K. an opportunity, but that
we were not bound by contract to do so.
Councilman Hafliger stressed that the people of the
City need to know that there will be an additional
charge for recycling, that it doesn't come free.
City Attorney Cox stated that O.K. did indicate that
whatever they come up with would be done at cost
Brian McNabb stated that within our City limits we
have an obligation to reduce the waste treatment
going into the landfills by 25% by the year 1995 and
by 50% by the year 2000. The study we commissioned
by Kleinfelder is developing a solid waste
management plan for the City. One of the principal
parts of the waste management plan is the waste
generation study and an analysis of what we
collect in San Jacinto. Ultimately the goals may
be different that need to be met by each
City/County, due to a difference in waste
generation.
Mayor Boykin agreed with Councilman Hafliger that
it would be nice to get both San Jacinto and Uemet,
as well as the County to work together to come up
with a recycling plan. Also have Staff look into
the possibility of going to once a week instead of
twice a week pickup.
Mayor Boykin stated that the feeling from Council appears to be a
direction to Staff to work with O.K. Associates, in ascertaining
what they are doing as far as a recycling plan and also possibly
looking into the once a week instead of twice a week.
Councilwoman Leahy suggested a time frame be set for the project.
Councilman Ford suggested we speak with Hemet for any information
they may be able to pass onto us as far as their recycling program
is going.
9
April 2, 1991 Minutes
Page 10
V. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
A. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1948
A Resolution of the City of San Jacinto, California,
supporting the desire of the City of Lake Elsinore
to acquire and exercise jurisdiction of the Lake.
Motion by Councilman Ford to adopt Resolution No. 1948 and waive
the reading in full.
Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy
Motion carried: 4-0.
Councilman Ford gave a "bouquet to both the Police and
Fire Departments for good, polite and professional
service on several occasions witnessed recently by the
Councilman.
Councilwoman Leahy made mention of the City's welcoming
sign on Ramona Expressway needing painting. Ms. Leahy
further requested City participation in the Cinco de Mayo
parade.
Mayor Boykin reminded everyone of the "Welcome Home"
parade in Moreno Valley on Saturday, April 6, 1991. The
Mayor additionally noted the WRCOG meeting at Harry C's
on April 8, with "water issues" as the topic.
VI. EXECUTIVE SESSION - to discuss Labor Negotiations and
Personnel Matters
Motion by Councilman Ford to go into Executive Session for the
discussion of labor negotiations, personnel matters and potential
litigation.
Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy.
Motion carried: 4-0 at 8:57 p.m.
Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to return to Regular Session.
Seconded by Councilman Ford.
Motion carried: 4-0 at 10:11 p.m.
10
April 2, 1991 Minutes
Page 11
Let the record show that no action was taken as a result of the
Executive Session.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Councilman Ford to adjourn to April 16, 1991.
Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy.
Motion carried: 4-0 at 10:12 p.m.
Next regular City Council meeting May 7, 1991
11
GLCD12
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS
UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK A/C 201398
CHECK ISSUED TO
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
24794* HEALTH NET INSURANCE
24795* HEALTH NET COBRA-DONAHUE & LEETS
24796* BLUE CROSS OF SO. CA. HEALTH INSURANCE
24797* BLUE CROSS OF SO, CA. COBRA-STEVENS & REDDING
24798* STANDARD INS. COMPANY LIFE & DISABILITY
24799* NATIONAL CIVIC LEAUGE 5 HANDBOOKS-COUNCIL
24800* VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVLP. OUTLOOK DAY
24601* PUBLIC EMP. RET. SYSTEM RETIREMENT
24802* SOBOBA SPRINGS MAYOR/COUNCIL CONFERENCE-DEPOSIT
24803* VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVLP. OUTLOOK DAY
24804* SAN JACINTO WORKERS CO REIMBRUGE ACCOUNT
24805* CITY OF SAN JACINTO NET PAYROLL
24806* FIRST INTERSTATE BANK FEDERAL TAXES
24807* STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE TAXES
24808* FIRST INTERSTATE BANK SS MEDICARE
24809* RIVERSIDE CO. EMP. CREDIT UNION
24810 BRIAN DEYO TRAINING FIRE COURSE
24811 CARL WOLFORD POST SEMINAR
24812 ACADEMY OF JUSTICE SEMINAR-P.D.
24813 AT & I CELLULAR PHONE-ASST. CITY MANAGER
24814 AFTONS FLOWERS & GIFTS ARRANGEMENT-FORD
24815 ALL PURE CHEMICAL CO. CHLORINE & SODA-WATER TREATMENT
24816 ALLMARK. INC. IMPROVEMENTS-HEWITT & ESPLANADE
24017 ALPHA BETA COFFEE & SUGAR-CIVIC CENTER
24818 AMERICAN TELECONFERNCNG TELECONF. CHARGES-AD 87-1
24819 RALPH ANDERSON & ASSC. DEVELOP PSIM MODEL-P.D,
24820 ARROW PRINTING ORDINANCE FLYER-ANIMALS
24821 ASSOCIATION OF CALIF. REGISTRATION-TOWNSEL
24622 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS LAB TESTS-WATER
24623 HECTOR BAEZA REIMBe WATER RENEWAL FEES
24824 BIRMINGHAM'S WEFDFATER LINE
24825 BOB'S LUMBER RED BRICK-WATER DEPT.
24826 CRA ASSOCIATION MEMBERGHIP-REDEVELOPMENT
24827 CA. BUILDING OFFICIAL VIDEO ON INSPECTIONS
24828 ST. BOARD-EQUALIZATION UNDERGROUND STORAGE CERTIF,
24829 CA. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CAL-OSHA HANDBOOKS
24830 CALIFORNIA SOCIETY SEMINAR-VEGA
24831 DEPT. OF CONSERVATION SMIP FEES
24832 CARSON INDUSTRIES COMPUTER CLEANERS-CIVIC CENTER
24833 CASTELLANO'S TOWING SER TOW UNIT 106-P.D.
24834 ROSS CHADWICK REIMBt RIBBON-F.D.
24835 CITY OF SAN JACINTO CONSUMER DEPOSITS
24836 R. BOHANON CONSUMER DEPOSITS
24837 MARK BETHELL CONSUMER DEPOSITS
24838 EVELYN OLLMANN CONSUMER DEPOSITS
24839 DOROTHY SHEFFIELD CONSUMER DEPOSITS
24840 BILL SIMPSON CONSUMER DEPOSITS
24841 ROSE GARCIA CONSUMER DEPOSITS
24842 GRIFFITH BROS. CONSUMER DEPOSITS
24843 COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL FIREFIGHTER EXAMS
24044 COX & COX LEGAL SERVICES
17,754.12
232+84
2,428+00
893.00
3,240.35
62.50
20.00
19,007.12
200.00
20.00
L7,150.19
90,843.01
16,906.39
3,896.51
1,682.70
2,154.00
110+00
72.50
297.00
8.97
35.09
847.50
19,557.17
20.82
42.75
6,585.14
182.12
375.00
42.00
25.00
23.01
6.30
735.00
34.95
64+30
111.00
50.00
759+43
99.95
35.00
38.5'1
2,932.05
4.52
1.99
9.22
22.53
19.58
14.98
15+13
628,50
2,910.00
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
GLCI:112
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS PAGE
UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK A/C 201.398
DATE: 4/1.5/91.
CHECK ISSUED TO
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
24845 CREST MEDICAL INC. OXYGEN•F.D.
24846 DAMON REFERENCE LAB, LABORATORY FEES-P.D.
24847 GERALD DAVENPORT GUIDLINES & PROFILE-REDEVELOPMENT
24848 DIVINE'S INSURANCE BLANKET BOND-PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'
24849 ERS-NASS BOOK•POLITICAL LEADERS
24850 EASTERN MUNI .WATER DIST UTILITIES
24851 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY CO. 50-6" DISCHARGE HOSE-FLOOD
24852 EVANS TIRE CO+ TIRES& REPAIRS
24853 STEVE FILARSKY LEGAL SERVICES-P.D.
24854 OFELIA FIERRO REIMB. MILEAGE
24855 FINAL TOUCH MARKETING CONSULTING-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
24856 GARDNER ROOFING CO. REFUND OF PERMIT
24857 GTE MAINT. P.D. & Co-C.
24858 GTE MOBILE COMMUNICATIO CELLULAR-TOWNSEL
24859 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. PHONE SERVICES
24860 HAYNES FIRE EXTG. SERV+ SERVICES-F.D. MAINT.-FIRE EXTG.
24861 HEMET EMGY. MEDICAL MEDICAL SERVICES-P.D
24862 HEMET NEWS LEGAL ADVERTISING
24863 HEMET OIL INC. GASOLINE
24864 ROBT. To HENDERSON INC. LEGAL SERVICES
24865 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE EOUIPMENT-P.D.
24866 HILLTOP SOFTWARE SERVIC COMPUTER PROGRAMMING-WATER DEFT.
24867 HOT SHOTS 1 HOUR PHOTO FILM PROCESSING-P.D.
24868 HOUSE OF OUALITY AUTO PARTS
24869 HUBBS STATIONERY OFFICE SUPPLIES
24870 I.B.M. CORP. LEASE/RENTAL-LINE PRINTER
24871 I.C.B.O. MEMBERSHIP DUES-F.D,
24872 KAMMEYER & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURAL-HOFFMAN PARK
24873 LIGHTING POWDER CO. C.S.I. SUPPLIES-P.D.
24874 AMISTAD ASSOCIATES STAFF RETREAT
24875 LONGS DRUG STORE FILM-PD,
24876 LONGS DRUG STORE FILM-F.D,
24877 AMETEK/MC CROMETER DIV. WATER METERS
24878 MARKMAN, ARZYNSKI LEGAL SERVICES-HOUSEL/CLAIM
24879 MARDEN-SUSCO WTR, PIPE & SUPPLIES
24880 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM CLEANING
24881 MUNICIPAL ENG.CONSLTNT. ENGINEERING SERVICES
24882 NATL.FIRE PROT.ASSOC. MEMBERSHIP-F.D.
24883 NELL NELSON REIMBe MILEAGE
24884 OVERNIGHT INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES-ALL DEPTS.
24885 ROBERT A. OWEN LEGAL SERVICES-AD. 87-1
24006 PACESETTER BUILDING PLAN CHECKING-F.D.
24887 PACTELL CELLULAR-LA CELLULAR PHONE-P.D.
24888 PAGENET RENTAL RADIO PAGERS-P.D. & STREETS
24889 LARRY PIERCE PLUMBING WATER SUPPLIES
24890 R.F. COMMUNICATION REPR. RADAR UNITS-P.D.
24891 RACEWAY FORD PARTS-P.D.
24892 MIKE READE CHEV, PARTS•P.D.
24893 RCLEA ANNUAL DUES-CHIEF OF POLICE
24894 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PROPERTY TAX-RDA SB2557
24895 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP. SUPPLIES
37.50
163.63
4,750,00
230.00
0.00
66.96
211.94
1p626.34
3,270.00
9.62
500.00
36.50
574442
100.30
1,700.65
70.94
124.00
258.19
1 +282.90
732.00
64,05
647.50
140,33
1,792487
236.71
188+00
2,659.95
6,777.00
185414
1,086.80
208463
166.91
111.41
824.00
75.62
534.56
4,419.00
70.12
16.64
855.66
1,674.00
30,718,23
631.41
273.81
17.79
102.00
219.82
188+51
50,00
11,732.00
130400
CHECK
24896
24897
24898
24899
24900
24901
24902
24903
24904
24905
24906
24907
24908
24909
24910
24911
24912
24913
24914
24915
24916
ISSUED TO
SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM
S.J. CHAMBER COMMERCE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
S.J. WORKERS' COMP.
SCOTSMAN MANUFACTURING
SHARP BUILDING SUPPLY
DOUG SHIPMAN
SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON
SO « CALIFORNIA GAS CO.
SPARKLETTS
SPEEDWELL DIVISION
FRANK STEENPORT
STEVE'S AUTO PARTS
TAC EXTERMINATORS
THOMAS.BYENE & SMITH
UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALE
UNION OIL CO«
CARL WARREN & CO.
WESTERN NURSE SPEC.
XEROX CORPORATION
ZELLER PRINTING
FUND 10
FUND 14
FUND 18
FUND 20
FUND 21
FUND 23
FUND 24
FUND 25
FUND 28
FUND 29
FUND 31
76,904.72
5,671.25
16,110.00
1,162.52
1,602.47
167.30
75.45
11,606.71
6,777.00
1,057.59
17.36
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
OLCD12
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS
PAGE 3
UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK A/C 201398
DATE 4/15/91
DESCRIPTION
BROOMS - SWEEPER
LUNCHEON-SECRETARY WEEK-F'.D.
UTILITY BILLS
REIMB« ACCOUNT
MONTHLY LEASE-P.D. OFFICES
BUILDING SUPPLIES
REIMB« TRAFFIC SEMINAR
UTILITY
UTILITY
BOTTLED WATER
TARGETS-P.D.
POST SEMINAR-P.D,
VEHICLE PARTS
SPRAYING AT MUSEUM
AUDIT•RDA/CITY/STATE REPOra:,3
UTILITY FAX NOTICE-WATER DEPT.
MOTOR OIL
INGNRANCE ADJUSTERS-CLAIMS
DLOOn DRAWS-P.D.
MAINTENANCE-ALL DEPARTMENTS
500-NCR REPAIR ORDER
- - - - - - - - - - -
FINAL TOTAL
FUND 36 1,764.36
FUND 42 2,099.75
FUND 65 22,012.20
FUND 66 6,619.64
FUND 91 8,716.00
FUND 96 15,206.68
FUND 99 1,100.00
Payroll 154,751.85
Misc. Revenue 36.50
FUND 50 18,739.86
TOTAL $352,199.21
AMOUNT
353.03
37.50
190.65
1,276.20
052.00
474.23
69.90
11,863.90
2,400.79
69.50
288.00
246.00
260.29
37.50
35 t 400.00
42.00
451.98
762.52
150.00
1,013.57
98.74
352,199.21
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
March 28, 1991
Award of Contract to the Nadel Partnership for Master Planning
Services
As you know, the City has been working on conceptual master planning of the Block
bounded by Esplanade, Hewitt, Commonwealth, and San Jacinto as well as the
commercial property east of Hewitt Street. This Block contains both the Hopkins
Development parcel and the City's 7.5 acres.
The architect for Hopkins, the Nadel Partnership Inc., has expressed a willingness to
coordinate the Hopkins' plan with a master plan for the block which we asked them
to give us a proposal on.
In order to properly plan the block, Staff feels it is important to work with a single
group to coordinate layout and development standards.
The work program with Nadel will be multiple-phased. Initially involving the land
ond circulation planning and ending with design criteria to be followed. The cost of
the master plan will be initially borne by the City. Staff will ultimately be bringing
back a resolution calling for incremental reimbursement as development occurs.
Staff recommends the Council award the master planning contract to the Nadel
Partnership Inc.
Respectfully,
BRIAN MC -NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:lr
'Si 14:'34
Mr. grin McNabb
Director of Community Development
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
201 East Main Street
San Jacinto, CA 9238,1
RE: Master Plan of "Superblocicn
At San Jacinto Avenue &
Esplanade Avenue
NADEL NO.: 91-092
5o. Bundy Or
Fourlh Floor
Los Angeles
Cfornia 90028
213 - 626 200
The FAX 213 826 0182
Nadel
Partnership Inc.
Arohilisclule
Planning
Interiors
29 March 1991
Dear Brian:
We are pleased to submit the following proposal for Master Planning work at
the San Jacinto Superblock at the southeast corner of San Jacinto Avenue and
Esplanade Avenue.
The planning and design of a major parcel of land within a developing
community represents a challenging endeavor for both the planner and owner.
This is due to the varied nature of the environmental, social and economic
issues that must be considered during the project development. Further, the
planned environment will significantly affect the surrounding area, work
patterns, travel behavior and life styles of the community.
Because of the location and scale of the San Jacinto Superblock and its
anticipated role in the overall development of the City of San Jacinto, creat
care must be exercised in establishing the planninc and design direction of the
property, as it will become a major focal point for the city.
The NADEL Partnership welcomes the opportunity to provide planning serrices
for your proposed developments. Clients such as Trammell Crow, The City of
Commerce, Birtcher, Santa Fe Realty, The City of Moreno Valley and Watt
Industries can attest to our creativity and competence in both planning and
design. We believe that the first phase of a development sets the tone and
architectural theme for all future development and that a unique planninc and
design concept will create a project with aesthetics impervious to time.
The combined experience and capabilities of The NADEL Partnership is
particularly suited for comprehensively analyzing the issues and developing
meaningful results. The expertise required to determine the primary aspects
of this study are concentrated within the principal members of the planning
team. Additional specialists in many disciplines are available from NADEL staff
resources, and they will be called upon as the project requirements evolve and
their support becomes evident. Enclosed you vvill find resumes of staff that will
he involved on your project.
'91 FF 213 220 0122
Mr. Brian McNabb
29 March 11
Page 2
We with to thank the City of San Jacinto for adding The NADEL Partnership
to your team for the Master Plan of the subject property. We look forward to
working with you on the development of specific buildings as the site planning
progresses. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed proposal,
please contact us at your convenience.
Very truly yours,
The NADEL Partnership, Inc.
Robert Jacques, AIA
Design Principal
cc: Herb Nadel
Jerry .taougal:(0C)
Enclosures
RAJ:clj
91 -092.Itr
Fi P
L
2 April 1991 Mr. Brian McNabb
Director: of Community Development
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
201 East Main Street
San Jadnto, CA 92383
RE: Master Plan of "Superblockm
At San Jacinto Avenue &
Esplanade Avenue
NADEL NO.: 91-092
1990 So. BunOy Dr
Fourtn flo
Los Angeles
California 90025
23'826 2100
The FAX 213 826 018P
Nadel
Partnership Inc.
Architecture
Planning
Interiors
Dear Brian:
Per your request, we have prepared a proposal outlining our services for the
San Jacinto Superblock. The project scope will consist initially of master plan
studies for a parcel of approximately 57 acres which will include the proposed
Hopkins Retail Center, senior citizen housing, additional retail and commercial
uses and an interim City Hall complex that may eventually function as an office
building. Ultimately, building design concepts will be generated which can be
developed into complete buildings or which can be incorporated into the
codes, covenants and restrictions of the development.
NPRE-CONTRACTR SERVICES
We have outlined the scope of work under which the NADEL team will proceed
to develop a master plan for this development.
SECTION I -SCOPE OF WORK OUTLINE
Phase I Project Initiation
1.1 Introduction of NADEL team to the City of San Jacinto.
1.2 Refine scope of study and requirements.
1.3 Establish development goals with city.
* 1.4 Obtain available physical data of property.
* 1.5 Consult with applicable governmental agencies.
Phase II Research, Data Consolidation & Analysis
* 2.1 Analyze Building and Zoning Codes to determining physical design.
* 2.2 Establish existing and planned land uses.
* 2.3
Establish traffic patterns and transportation system capacities in the San
Jacinto vicinity.
* 2.4
Analyze existing infrastructure capacity and planned improvements if
desirable.
* 2.5 Analyze environmental issues.
P F P
Li 'Lii 1 H:HLL
Mr. Brian McNabb
2 Apri11991
Page 2
Phase III Opportunities/Constraints Analysis & Preliminary Design
Alternatives
* 3.1 Collate data from governing agencies, market, land use, traffic and
transportation, environmental, infrastructure and aesthetic character
studies.
3.2 Prepare preliminary master plan.
3.0 Prepare schematic architectural design concepts for various building
types.
3.4 Process and evaluation with client committee.
Phase IV Evaluate Preliminary Alternatives/Select Preferred Master Plan
* 4.1 Coordinate with your traffic and transportation consultant.
* 4.2 Coordinate preliminary infrastructure demand analysis with your
consultant.
4.3 Coordinate with your landscape consultant.
4.4 Prepare evaluation results.
* 4.5 Coordinate with your consultants on E.I.R., if required.
4.6 Meet with Client Committee to select preferred master plan.
Phase V Refine & Complete Preferred Master Plan
5.1 Refine selected master plan and architectural conceptual alternative.
* 5.2 Coordinate with your consultant on final traffic circulation study.
* 5.3 Address environmental concerns.
5.4 Define and complete landscape plan.
5.5 Meet with Client Committee to review findings.
Phase VI Project Implementation
5.1 Finalize detailed master plan and architectural building concept
alternatives.
6.2 Coordinate with your landscape consultant on final design.
6.3 Final presentation.
To be provided by the City of San Jacinto, if required.
Mr. Brian McNabb
2 April1991
Pide 3
SECTION II - PRELIMINARY PROJECT SCHEDULE
This schedule is an estimate and has been developed through our analysis of
the duration of each task, simultaneous tasks and associated tasks. The time
involved is expressed in weeks and can be adjusted to reflect changes in
criteria, scheduling approval sessions, or by report results.
Phase I
Phase II
Phase Ill
Phase IV
Phase V
Phase VI
Week 1
Week 2 &3
Week 3 - 5
Week 6 & 7
Week 7 - 9
Week 10 - 12
SECTION III- BASIC FEE
A. Our Basic Fee for research and planning services is .based on the
completion of all tasks as defined in this document which specifically
responds to your Request for Proposal.
B. Without the knowledge of specific issues regarding the anticipated
scope of your project, we have estimated the NADEL fee (without
consultants) based on our professional experience and the following
assumptions:
The project will be developed on about 57 acres in the city of San
Jacinto, California
2. We will create maximum value to The City of San Jacinto based on
current market conditions.
3. We will satisfy The requirements of all San Jacinto governmental
agencies which have jurisdiction over the development.
4. We will create an entry image, as well as a sense of community as
a marketing tool for the development.
5. We will create a master plan conforming to the geographical,
functional, aesthetic, and fiscal concerns, taking into consideration
a development process that is flexible and that respects the existing
infrastructure and has the ability to be modified according to
municipality processes.
6. That all of the above shall be addressed as primary objectives in the
Master Plan, incorporating land use and a building design study.
F F! iF;:iF lit 11 r4 2 13 Cl 1 !:":
Mr. Brian McNabb
2 April 1991
Page 4
7. We will prepare architectural concept plans and elevations.
8. We will coordinate all above tasks with The City of San Jacinto.
Work shall be presented for review along with The City of San
Jacinto's selected consultants work, at the end of each phase.
C. We have based out architect's planning fees on the NADEL hourly
schedule. Our hourly rates are as follows:
Principal/Director
Project Manager/Senior Designer
Senior Drafter/Designer
Intermediate Drafter
Other Staff
$125
95
80
70
60
ARCHITECTS MASTER PLANNING FEE (Not to exceed without prior
authorization):
For Phase I, U & Ill
$19,400
For Phase IV, V & VI
$31,760
In addition, we are to be reimbursed at a multiple of one and one-fifteenth
(1,15) times direct costs incurred for such items as mileage, travel,
reproductions, postage,handling and long distance telephone calls. Rates
quoted are subject to annual revision.
When the project continues into the architectural phase, and we are authorized
to further develop a building or buildings, we will prepare a separate proposal
and a Standard ALA Agreement confirming our scope of services and a
mutually acceptable lump sum fee. The reusable portion of the building
concept studies will be returned to you as a credit toward the architectural fee.
All billings shall become due and payable upon presentation of the invoice.
Interest at one point over the prime lending rate shall be charged against
billings past due over 30 days.
We reserve the right to amend this quotation ninety (90) days from this date.
Mr. Brian McNabb
2 April 1991
Page 6
Either part to this Agreement, at their option, may institute legal proceedings
on account of alleged failure by the other to perform in accordance with its
terms. The party against whom judgement is rendered in a court of law or
court of arbitration shall pay all expenses in connection with the enforcement
of this Agreement, including legal fees and court costs.
We truly appreciate the opportunity to work with you, and believe the results
of our joint effort will satisfy our needs in a successful and creative manner.
If the foregoing meets with your approval, please sing and return one copy of
this Agreement so that we may be able to proceed with the work.
Very truly yours, CONFIRMED & ACCEPTED BY:
The NADEL Partnership, Inc.
ame of Company)
Robert Jacques, AIA
Design Principal
cc: Hei-b Nadel
Jerry Dougal (0C)
RA.J:clj
91-092.raj
gal Enti
(Signature)
(Title)
(State)
RESOLUTION NO. 1953
A RESOLUTION OFTHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, TO AUTHORIZE ADVANCE AND
INVESTMENT OF FUNDS TO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
3
NO. 87-1
4 Recitals
5 Instrument No. 17780 records of Riverside County, a special
WHEREAS, on January 19, 1989, there was recorded as
tax lien upon certain real property known as Assessment District 6 87-1, said special tax assessment lien was imposed to finance
certain improvements pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the Streets 7 and Highways Code and Section 53328.3 of the Government Code;
and 8
WHEREAS, the property owner has defaulted in the payment
9
the assessment due on said parcels; and
10
WHEREAS, demands have been made to the property owner for
payment of such defaulted assessments and legal proceedings 11 have been commenced for collection of the defaulted assessments
through foreclosure of the property so assessed. The property 12 owner has instituted bankruptcy proceedings which has delayed
the collection of the defaulted payments; and 13
WHEREAS, as the result of the defaults of the property owner, 14
insufficient funds remained in the bond redemption fund for
full payment of the bond interest payment due on March 2, 1991. 15 The amount of the deficiency required to make such payment is
$48,482.73; and 16
WHEREAS, pursuant to the bond documents, the City of San 17
Jacinto has no obligation to advance available funds from the
City Treasury to cure any deficiency which may occur in the 18
Redemption Fund; however, the City may, in its sole discretion,
advance such funds; and 19
WHEREAS, upon foreclosure of such property, or upon earlier 20
payment of the defaulted payments by the property owner, such
21 payments will bear annual interest in the same amounts as
provided by law upon the default CF ad valorem real property
22 taxes.
23
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO AS FOLLOWS:
24
1. The above facts are found to be true and correct.
25
26
27
2. The City Finance Director is authorized and directed
to advance the sum of $48,482.73 to the Bond Redemption Fund
for Assessment District No. 87-1 for the purpose of paying the
bondinterestpayment which was due on March 2, 1991.
28
29
30
31
3. The advanced amount shall be repaid to the City of San
Jacinto upon redemption or sale of the real property. The City
of San Jacinto shall be entitled to interest on such amount
advanced until the date of collection in an amount-equal to
the statutory interest applied to delinquent ad valorem real
property taxes.
32
2
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1991, by the
2
following vote:
AYES:
3
NOES:
4
ABSENT:
5
Mayor
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
By:
Deputy
CERTIFICATE
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of a
Resolution adopted by the City Council for the City of
San Jacinto on the date therein set forth.
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
By:
Deputy
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
EXPENDITURES
TO DATE
SH
BALANCE
3,021,417
136,192
37,905
2,772
60,103
01,189
116,145
17,909
57,484
101,221
9,203
22,667
144,715
17,498
24,155
1,851
1,633,289
53
38,117
65,815
153,451
108,373
11,675
487,687
1,059,594
.158,160
1,050
101,725
513,477
8,985,052
9 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE FUND
O LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND
6 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
877,850CR
203,195
201,351
2,772CR
569,897
368,410
183,299
30,152
24,706
202,175
1,255
372,267
264,628
90,328CR
5,223CR
293,575
71,343
6,532,173
17,204
_ 74,520
1,827,998
59,554
390,079
10,248CR
2,217,681
267,020
106,021
529,456
677,784
53,485
167,433
408,515
21,026
33,658
7,908,045
570,833
321,318
----------
24,064,435
FUND
U. DESCRIPTION
STY OF SAN JACINTO
FINANCIAL REPORT OF ACTIVITY
FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 3/31/91
REVENUES
TO DATE
3
O GENERAL FUND 2,761,913
4 SEWER MAINTENANCE & DEVELOPMENT 130,864
8 WORKMANS COMPENSATION INSURANCE END 30,41
1 GAS TAX FUND 151,054
MEASURE A - GAS TAX FUND 166,311
3 LOCAL TRANSPORATION FUND ART. 0 48,060
4 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 55,153
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND 119,165
7 INTEREST FUND 372,267
B PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND 77,419
• -HCD - HUD FUND
1 SWIMMING POOL FUND 10,172
2 PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT FUND 84,25Q
5 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 44 56,458
5 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT JL2
2,332,049
7 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 03 17,257
3 UNDERGROUND UTILITY 10,500
? FLOOD CONTROL 746,913
) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 38,093
TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION 63,705
ASSESSMENT DIST+ 14,956
3 DEBT SERVICE-COMMUNITY FACILITIES
5 WATER SURCHARGE FUND 26,656
7 WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 59,567
) WATER FUND 645,442
5 TRUST ACCOUNT FUND 1,259,461
i ASSETS FORFEITURE/EVIDENCE MONIES 90,059
; PAYROLL FUND
SOBOBA PROJECT FUND
85,841
SOBOBA DEBT SERVICE
10
LOW-MOD INCOME HOUSING SOBOBA
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FUND 716,442
REDEVELOPMENT DEBT SERVICE FUND 173
LOW-MOD INCOME HOUSING S.j. PROJECT
----------
10,170,624
ESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
AMELA S. EASTER
ITY MANAGER
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
EXPENDITURE REPORT
PERIOD ENDING 3/31/91
PAGE 1
ACCOUNT
DEPARTMENT
APPROPRIATION EXPENDITURES
GENERAL FUND
10-1100 CITY COUNCIL 19,470
10-1200 CITY MANAGER 98,018
10-1300 CITY CLERK 13,375
10-1400 FINANCE 107,948
10-1500 TREASURER 835
10-1600 CITY ATTORNEY 32,800
10-1700 PLANNING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 260,288
10-1900 GENERAL GOVERNMENT CIVIC CENTER 34,380
10-2200 INSURANCE N/D
10-2230 FIRE INSURANCE & BLANKET BONDS N/D 36,610
10-2250 PERSONNEL 62,593
10-2400 ANNEXATION N/D 6,800
10-2500 NON-DEPARTMENTAL 14,950
10-3100 POLICE 1,959,591
10-3200 FIRE 761,738
10-3300 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING 260,878
10-3400 PUBLIC SERVICES ANIMAL REGULATIONS 39,306
10-3500 PUBLIC SERVICES EMERGENCY SERVICES 8,250
10-3600 PUBLIC SAFETY - COMMUNICATIONS 210,957
10-4100, PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING ADMIN 29,040
10-4150 PUBLIC WORKS CORPORATION YARD 114,096
10-4200 PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINTENANCE 104,178
10-4400 PUBLIC WORKS STREET CLEANING 39,082
10-4550 PUBLIC WORKS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 70,692
10-5100 GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL HEALTH SERVICE 1,000
10-6100 PUBLIC SERVICE MUSEUM 8,390
10-7100 PUBLIC WORKS PARKS 39,517
10-7400 PUBLIC SERVICES COMMUNITY CENTER 78,096
FUND 10 TOTAL 4,412,878
375,300
375,300
SEWER MAINTENANCE & DEVELOPMENT
14-4600 PUBLIC WORKS SEWER TRANSMISSION MN•
14-4610 LIFT STATION
FUND 14 TOTAL
WORKMANS COMPENSATION INSURANCE FND
18-2350 WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION N/D
FUND 18 TOTAL
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE FUND
19-2150 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION N/D
FUND 19 TOTAL
LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND
20-2200 INSURANCE N/D
FUND 20 TOTAL
GAS TAX FUND
21-0210 PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINT4 & CONST.
FUND 21 TOTAL
16,700
84,661
21,305
52,004
970
23,092
193,687
59,719
974
943
36,221
12,013
454,734
1,588,529
610,698
166,756
28,559
130,480
80,316
48,620
43,106
28,367
46,425
5,648
24,817
62,074
3,821,417
135,832
360
136,191
37,985
37,985
2,772
2,772
60,103
60,103
81,189
81,189
1:17,458
117,450
97,000
97,000
6,000
6,000
35'7,900
357,900
86
86
159
48
116
70
74
174
3
58
177
3042
81
80
64
73
62
277
43
41
73
66
67
63
79
87
116
1.1.6
39
39
46
46
:1.7
3.7
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
EXPENDITURE REPORT
PERIOD ENDING 3/31/91 PAGE 2
APPROPRIATION EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT DEPARTMENT
719,500
719,500
116,145
116,145
16
16
196,000
196,000
17,909
17,908
9
9
85,549
85,549
57,484
57,484
67
67
256,466
256,466
101,221
101,220
39
39
78,500
78,500
29 22,667
22,667 29
90,328
54,387
144,714
26
41
348,786
348,786
23,925
23,925
73 17,498
17,498 73
45,000
45,000
54 24,155
24,155 54
MEASURE A - GAS TAX FUND
22-8220 STREET IMPROVEMENTS-PUBLIC WORKS
FUND 22 TOTAL
LOCAL TRANSPORATION FUND ART, 0
23-8230 PUBLIC WORKS STREET & HIGHWAY IMPRV
FUND 23 TOTAL
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
24-8240 PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC SAFETY
FUND 24 TOTAL
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND
25-0250 PUBLIC WORKS STREET LIGHTING MAINT
FUND 25 TOTAL
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
26-8260 GENERAL OVMT SAFETY & WELFARE
FUND 26 TOTAL
PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND
28-7150 PUBLIC WORKS PARK DEVELOPMENT
FUND 28 TOTAL
HCD HUD FUND
29-8660 PUBLIC WORKS HOUSING & COMMUNITY DV
29-8661 DOWNTOWN WATER
FUND 29 TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
31-8400 SWIMMING POOL
FUND 31 TOTAL
PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT FUND
32-7250 PUBLIC WORKS PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT
FUND 32 TOTAL
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 41
35-2500 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
FUND 35 TOTAL
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 42
36-2500 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
36-8360 COMMUNITY FACILITIES
FUND 36 TOTAL
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT :
37-2500 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
FUND 37 TOTAL
FLOOD CONTROL
39-8390 DRAINAGE PROJECT
FUND 39 TOTAL
38,117
38,116
9,283
9,283
1,851
1,851
1,633,289
1,633,289
53
53
629,937 457,730
123
4,455
17,141
7,643
595
73
629,937
487,687
77
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
EXPENDITURE REPORT
PERIOD ENDING 3/31/91
PAGE 3
ACCOUNT
DEPARTMENT
APPROPRIATION EXPENDITURES
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
40-2500 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
FUND 40 TOTAL
ASSESSMENT DIST,
42-8500 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 87-1
42-8501 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 90-1
FUND 42 TOTAL
DEBT-SERVICE-COMMUNITY FACILITIES
43-2500 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
FUND 43 TOTAL
WATER SURCHARGE FUND
45-9600 WATER TANK LOAN
FUND 45 TOTAL
WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
47-2250 PFRSONNPL
47-2500 NON-DEPARTMENTAL
47-9600 WATER TANK LOAN
FUND 47 TOTAL
WATER FUND
50-9000 WATER PURVEYANCE
50-9400 DOMESTIC WATER
50-9402 TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION
50-9404 PUMPING EXPENSES
50-9410 WATER TREATMENT AND STORAGE
50-9474 WATER DEPARTMENT CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS
50-9600 WATER TANK LOAN
FUND 50 TOTAL
TRUST ACCOUNT FUND
65-8650 TRUST FUND CLEARING
FUND 65 TOTAL
ASSETS FORFEITURE/EVIDENCE MONIES
66-8650 TRUST FUND CLEARING
FUND 66 TOTAL
SOBOBA PROJECT FUND
91-9700 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
FUND 91 TOTAL
SOBOBA DEBT SERVICE
92-9700 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
FUND 92 TOTAL
LOW-MOD INCOME HOUSING SOBOBA
94-9700 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
FUND 94 TOTAL
294,100
65,815
294,100
65,8:L4
:157,700
98,725
63
54,726
157,700
153,450
9'7
108,373
108,372
13,600
11,675
86
13,600
11,675
86
1,059,594
1,059,594
158,160
158,159
45,600
1,050
45,600
1,050
19,000
19,000
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
EXPENDITURE REPORT
PERIOD ENDING 3/31/91
PAGE 4
ACCOUNT
DEPARTMENT
APPROPRIATION EXPENDITURES
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FUND
96-9700 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
FUND 96 TOTAL
REDEVELOPMENT DEBT SERVICE FUND
97-9700 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
FUND 97 TOTAL
117,009
117,009
845,795
845,795
101,725
101,724
513,477
513,476
87
87
61
61
LOW-MOD INCOME HOUSING S.J. PROJECT
99-9700 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
28,666
FUND 99 TOTAL
28,666
LEDGER TOTAL
9,271,669 8,985,052 97
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
REVENUE REPORT
PERIOD ENDING 3/31/91
PAGE 1
ACCOUNT
ESTIMATED
TO-DATE
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
REVENUE
REVENUE
4*.
GENERAL FUND
10-0110
10-0111
10-0115
10-0117
10-0120
10-0130
10-0141
10-0142
10-0143
10-0144
10-0145
10-0160
10-0165
10-0210
10-0212
10-0220
10-0221
10-0222
10-0233
10-0235
10-0236
10-0237
10-0240
10-0250
10-0320
10-0330
10-0410
10-0411
10-0412
10-0440
10-0501
10-0505
10-0509
10-0510
10-0511
10-0513
10-0515
10-0529
10-0530
10-0567
10-0568
10-0500
10-0590
10-0595
10-0601
10-0602
10-0604
10-0605
10-0610
10-0615
TAXES CURRENT YEAR SECURED
TAXES CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED
TAXES PRIOR YEARS
PENALTIES
SALES AND USE TAXES
TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX
SOUTHERN CALIF GAS FRANCHISE
SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON FRANCHISE
CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE
REFUSE FRANCHISE
WATER FRANCHISE
BUSINESS LICENSE
PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX
ANIMAL LICENSES
BICYCLE LICENSES
GRADING
BUILDING PERMITS
PLUMBING PERMITS
ELECTRICAL PERMITS
MECHANICAL PERMITS
STREET & CURB PERMITS
PRE-INSPECTION
OTHER LICENSES & PERMITS
OTHER CODE FINES
FORFEITS AND PENALTIES LITTER
INVESTMENT EARNINGS
INTEREST FROM RDA LOANS
INTEREST-FISCAL AGENT
LABOR+ RENTAL. EQUIP. ETC.
SUPPLEMENTAL PROPERTY TAX AB-2345
STATE VEHICLE IN LIEU
VEHICLE OFF ROAD
HOMEOWNER'S TAX RELIEF
LICENSE VERIFICATION
TRAILER COACH IN-LIEU
CIGARETTE TAXES
P.O.S.T.
SPECIAL SUPPL. STATE SUBVENTION
LEASE-RENTAL CITY PROPERTY
LEASE/RENT
WASTE MANAGEMENT
CETA GRANTS
HIGHWAY CARRIERS IN-LIEU
ZONING FEES
ANNEXATION FEE
GENERAL PLAN FEES
SUBDIVISION FEES
MAPS, PUBLICATIONS. ETC,
SPECIAL POLICING
500,000
20,000
30,000
920,000
8,000
50,000
35,000
48,000
140,000
46,000
114,000
70,000
3,000
10,000
425,000
70,000
75,000
32,000
130,000
3,000
500
7,000
10,000
100,000
2,000
35,000
525,000
270
10,000
30,000
32,500
24,400
16,000
23,000
2,000
35,000
6,800
3,000
55,000
2,500
3,000
290,267
22,099
43,738
579,626
7,441
424
603
52,472
116,961
31,914
103,794
40,345
1,988
114
3,637
255,770
38,971
41,820
20,574
70,150
295
4,201
1,761
342
141 .L,WCI7d- O',
401,709
254
8,510
19,073
19,880
18,438
21,726
24,375
3,895
30
17,959
25,882
2,560
1,661
41,425
1,980
4,148
58
110
146
63
93
1
-7)
109
84
69
91
58
66
36
60
56
56
64
54
59
60
18
17
'7 A
77
94
64
61
76
136
;1.06
74
38
55
75
79
138
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
REVENUE REPORT
PERIOD ENDING 3/31/91 PAGE '71
DESCRIPTION
FUND
FIRE SPRINKLERS PERMITS & INGPCT,
SPECIAL FIRE
PLAN CHECKING FEES
PLAN STORAGE FEES
PLAN CHECKING ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING FEES
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
FLOOD CONTROL ENGINEERING
STREET AND SIDEWALK REPAIR
WEED AND LOT CLEANING FEES
SENIOR CITIZENS
SENIOR CITIZENS DONATIONS
SALE OF PROPERTY
SEWER PERMITS
CONTRIBUTIONS NON-GOVERNMENT
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
OTHER REVENUE
MISCt
UTILITY COLLECTIONS
OVER & SHORT
FUND 10 TOTAL
ESTIMATED
REVENUE
10,000
275,000
10,000
250,000
50,000
5,000
5,000
10,000
20,000
6,000
2,000
14,000
20,000
1,000
2,000
9,000
1,000
4,341,970
TO-DATE
REVENUE
234
1,385
14
218,228
79
8,256
83
46,575
19
30,230
60
18,537 371
10,017 100
27,963 140
5,688 95
1,145 57
22,206 159
11,396
57
626 63
1,125 56
6,291 70
20
2,553CR
178CR
2,761,913 64
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
GENERAL
10-0620
10-0625
10-0630
10-0635
10-0640
10-0645
10-0646
10-0647
10•0650
10-0660
10-0675
10-0676
10-0701
10-0720
10-0745
10-0780
10-0790
10-0791
10-0795
10-0999
SEWER MAINTENANCE & DEVELOPMENT
14-0410
14-0411
14-0720
14-0730
14-0790
14-0890
INVESTMENT EARNINGS
INTEREST FROM RDA LOANS
SEWER PERMITS
SEWER MAINTENANCE FEES
OTHER REVENUE
DONATED ASSETS
FUND 14 TOTAL
35,000
46,863
134
110,000
83,105
76
897
14 5,000 130,864 90
30,413
30,413
76,800
55,072 72
135,000
80,426 60
3,000
4,000
133
WORKMANS COMPENSATION INSURANCE END
18-0800 WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION
18-0805 DIVIDENDS
FUND 18 TOTAL
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE FUND
19-0810 UNEMPLOYMENT
FUND 19 TOTAL
LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND
20-0790 OTHER REVENUE
20-0030 LIABILITY INSt
FUND 20 TOTAL
GAS TAX FUND
21-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
21-0506 GAS TAX 2106
21-0507 GAS TAX 2107
21-0508 GAS TAX 2107,5
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
REVENUE REPORT
PERIOD ENDING 3/31/91 PAGE
ACCOUNT
ESTIMATED
TO-DATE
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
REVENUE
REVENUE
GAS TAX FUND
21-0509 VEHICLE OFF ROAD
21-0516 GAS TAX 2105
FUND 21 TOTAL
MEASURE A - GAS TAX FUND
22-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
22-0520 MEASURE A - GAS TAX REVENUE
FUND 22 TOTAL
LOCAL TRANSPORATION FUND ART, 8
23-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
23-0550 ARTICLE 8 APPROPRIATION
FUND 23 TOTAL
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
24-0237 STREET & TRAFFIC SIGNS. PERMIT FEES
24-0310 VEHICLE CODE FINES
FUND 24 TOTAL
214,800
156,000
156,000
165,000
165,000
1 ,0 00
100,000
101,000
5,094
6,461
151,054
166,311
166,311
48,060
48,060
46,928
55,153
70
107
107
29
29
823
47
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND
25-0110 TAXES CURRENT YEAR SECURED
25-0111 TAXES CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED
25-0115 TAXES PRIOR YEARS
25-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
25-0501 SUPPLEMENTAL PROPERTY TAX
25-0510 HOMEOWNER'S TAX RELIEF
25-0565 NON COM. AIR TAX
25-0655 LLMD ASSESSMENT
25-0791 MISC.
160,000
18,221
1,637
3,057
1,121
546
94,584 59
FUND 25 TOTAL
160,000
119,165
74
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
26-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
26-0790 OTHER REVENUE
26-0991 BOND PROCEEDS
FUND 26 TOTAL
INTEREST FUND
27-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
FUND 27 TOTAL
PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND
28-0670 PARK DEVELOPMENT
28-0680 STATE GRANTS
FUND 20 TOTAL
300,000
300,000
60,000
60,000
372,267
372,267
52,219
25,200
77,419
124
.124
87
129
HOD - HUD FUND
29-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
29-0592 HCD GRANTS
29-0791 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE
FUND 29 TOTAL
350,000
350p000
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
REVENUE REPORT
PERIOD ENDING 3/31/91
PAGE 4
ACCOUNT
ESTIMATED TO-DATE
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
REVENUE
REVENUE
SWIMMING POOL FUND -
31-0110 TAXES CURRENT YEAR SECURED
31-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
31-0720 ADMISSION FEES
31-0790 OTHER REVENUE
31-0791 CONCESSION INCOME
31-0794 POOL ADMISSIONS
31-0795 POOL LESSONS
31-0796 POOL CONCESSIONS
31-0999 POOL SHORTAGES
FUND 31 TOTAL
13,000
4,000
17,000
4,995
3,640
1,538
10,172
28
38
60
PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT FUND
32-0673 PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT
100 ,000
84,250
84
FUND 32 TOTAL
100,000
84,250
84
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT t1
35•0110 TAXES CURRENT YEAR SECURED
35•0115 TAXES PRIOR YEARS
35-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
35-0790 OTHER REVENUE
FUND 33 TOTAL
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 02
36-0110 TAXES CURRENT YEAR SECURED
36-0115 TAXES PRIOR YEARS
36-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
36-0412 INTEREST FISCAL AGENT
36-0790 OTHER REVENUE
FUND 36 TOTAL
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT t3
37-0110 TAXES CURRENT YEAR SECURED
37-0115 TAXES PRIOR YEARS
37-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
37-0790 OTHER REVENUE
FUND 37 TOTAL
UNDERGROUND UTILITY
38-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
38-0880 UNDERGROUNDING FEE
FUND 38 TOTAL
FLOOD CONTROL
39-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
39-0422 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS-STORM DRAINS
39-0825 FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENT
FUND 39 TOTAL
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
40-0411 INTEREST FROM RDA LOANS
45,930
10,528
56,458
473,468
1,858,580
2,332,049 ,
7,757
9,500
17,257
10,500
10,500
2,436CR
749,349
746,913
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
REVENUE REPORT
PERIOD ENDING 3/31/91
PAGE
ACCOUNT
ESTIMATED TO-DATE
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
REVENUE
REVENUE
y;
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT -FUND
40-0420 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS - STRUCTURES
40-0421 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS - EQUIPTMENT
40-0422
40-0423 SIONALIZATION
40-0425 SPECIAL STORM DRAIN
40-0992 PROCEEDS FROM LEASE TRANSACTIONS
FUND 40 TOTAL
TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION
41-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
41-0423 SIGNALIZAT ION
41-0825 SIGNALIZATION IMPROVEMENT
FUND 41 TOTAL
ASSESSMENT DIST.
42-0110 TAXES CURRENT YEAR SECURED
42-0115 TAXES PRIOR YEARS
42-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
42-0790 OTHER REVENUE
42-0791 MISC.
50,000
50,000
157,000
21,806
16,286
38,093
20,175
43,530
63,705
14,954
-7)
44
76
10
FUND 42 TOTAL
157,000
14,956
10
DEBT SERVICE-COMMUNITY FACILITIES 2
43-0110 TAXES CURRENT YEAR SECURED
43-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
43-0412 INTEREST FISCAL AGENT
43-0991 PROCEEDS FROM LEASE TRANSACTIONS
FUND 43 TOTAL
50-0820
50-0825
50-0890
50-0910
50-0970
WATER DEPARTMENT REVENUES
WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
DONATED ASSETS
WATER COLLECTIONS
TURN ONS
FUND 50 TOTAL
35,000
35,000
35,000
35,000
22,000
720,000
3,000
745,000
26,656
26,656
59,567
59,567
64,609
579,483
1,300
645,472
WATER SURCHARGE FUND
45-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
45-0710 SURCHARGE ASSESSMENT
FUND 45 TOTAL
WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
47-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
47-0825 WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
FUND 47 TOTAL
WATER FUND
50-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
76
76
170
170
294
BO
43
87
TRUST ACCOUNT FUND
65-0865 MISCELLANEOUS
386,812
CITY OF CAN JACINTO
REVENUE REPORT
PERIOD ENDING 3/31/91
PAGE 6
ACCOUNT
ESTIMATED
TO-DATE
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
REVENUE
REVENUE
TRUST ACCOUNT FUND -
65-0866 ANNEXATION FEES
65-0867 CONSUMER DEPOSITS
65-0868 SMIP FEES
65-0869 REFUSE COLLECTIONS
65-0870 EMWD COLLECTIONS
65-0873 PERMIT TO OPERATE-STATE FEE
FUND 65 TOTAL
ASSETS FORFEITURE/EVIDENCE MONIES
66-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
66-0880 CITY*S ADJUDICATED MONIES
66-0887 UNADJUDICATED MONIES
66-0888 REIMBURSEMENT-CO. OF RIV & HEMET
FUND 66 TOTAL
SOBOBA PROJECT FUND
91-0405 TAX INCREMENT
91-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
91-0790 OTHER REVENUE
91-0990 PROCEEDS FROM LOANS
FUND 91 TOTAL
SOBOBA DEBT SERVICE
92-0405
92-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
FUND 92 TOTAL
LOW-MOD INCOME HOUSING SOBOBA
94-0405 TAX INCREMENT
94-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
FUND 94 TOTAL
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FUND
96-0405 TAX INCREMENT
96-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
96-0412 INTEREST FISCAL AGENT
96-0610 MAPS, PUBLICATIONS, ETC.
96-0790 PROCEEDS FROM LEASE TRANSACTIONS
96-0990 PROCEEDS FROM LOANS
96-0991 BOND PROCEEDS
FUND 96 TOTAL
REDEVELOPMENT DEBT SERVICE FUND
97-0405 TAX INCREMENT
97-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
97-0412 INTEREST FISCAL AGENT
97-0991 PROCEEDS FROM LEASE TRANSACTIONS
FUND 97 TOTAL
31,746
3,213
577,330
256,409
3,950
1,259,461
79,857
10,202
90,059
110,000
85,841 78
110,000
85,841 78
10
10
660,000
488,188 7k
660,000
716,442
109
1.73
173
LOW-MOD INCOME HOUSING S.J. PROJECT
99-0405 TAX INCREMENT
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
REVENUE REPORT
PERIOD ENDING 3/31/91 PAGE
ACCOUNT ESTIMATED TO-DATE
NUMBER DESCRIPTION REVENUE REVENUE
LOW-MOD INCOME HOUSING S.J. PROJECT
99-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS
FUND 99 TOTAL
LEDGER TOTAL 7902770 10 *170p654 129
6
7
WH 8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 ATTEST:
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
EREAS, the United States Air Force has announced the pro-
posed deactivation of the 943rd Tactical Airlift Group; and
WHEREAS, March Air Force Base is an integral part of our
community and the contributions of its personnel enrich and
strengthen our citizens and the City; and
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of a resolution
duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto on
the date therein mentioned.
WH
only Ai
EREAS, the 943rd Tactical Airlift Group represents the
r Force Tactical Airlift capability in the western United
States; and
WHEREAS, the 943rd Tactical Airlift Group is an outstanding
tactical airlift unit, composed of over 600 highly trained
personnel, including pilots, aircrews and aircraft maintenance
personn el; and
WH EREAS, the 943rd Tactical Airlift Group has an important
peaceti
with t
me mission supporting the United States Forest Service
he Modular Airborne Fire Fighting System and the unit is
strategically located in the highest wild-fire threat area in
the Uni ted States;
NO W, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto
does re
Chamber
that the City of San Jacinto supports the San Jacin
• of Commerce/Military Affairs Committee to prevail upon
the Air Force, the Department of Defense and the Congress, to
retain the 943rd Tactical Airlift Group as a tactical airlift
resource at March A.F.B., CA.
1
Deputy City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
Francis R. Boykin, Mayor
RESOLUTION NO. 1954
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO TO SUPPORT THE SAN JACINTO CHAMBER OF
2
COMMERCE/MILITARY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE WITH THEIR
EFFORTS TO RETAIN THE 943R D TACTICAL AIRLIFT
3
GROUP AT MARCH A.F.B.
4
WHEREAS, the City Council urges all citizens to show support
of all of our armed forces; and
5
32
"Commiite to Save the 943rd
April 1, 1991
Bob Jones
Hemet Chamber of Commerce
Military Affairs Committee
395 E. Latham Ave.
Hemet, CA 92343
RE "Committee to Save the 943rd Tactical Airlift Group"
Request For Support.
Bob:
Thanks for allowing the "Committee to Save the 943rd T.A.G." the
opportunity to bring to your attention the recent Air Force proposal to
deactivate the 943rd T.A.G. at March A.F.B.
The decision to deactivate this unit will affect over 600 local employees.
The annual budget for this unit including personnel, supplies and
equipment is approximately $12 million dollars, a major portion of which
translates into revenues received by your city, through jobs, services,
retail Sales and taxes.
The businesses of your city have already felt the dramatic loss of
revenues created with the loss of the 22nd Air Refueling Wing and the
deployment of March members to Saudi Arabia. The negative impact of the
proposed loss of jobs and revenues created by the proposed deactivation
could be disastrous to many of the businesses in your community.
Our efforts to retain the 943rd Air Force Reserve Unit in no way affects
the outcome of the Air Force's decision to move the Space Systems
Division. from L.A., or the movement of the 445th Military Airlift Wing
from Norton to March in 1993.
Although the 445th M.A.W. move will bring 189 full-time and 1,763 part-
time jobs, this buildup only begins to replace the jobs, services and
revenues which were lost with the elimination of the 22nd Air Refueling
Squadron. The proposed deactivation of the 943rd is unacceptable!
Scott Lisk, Chairman
(714) 824-0477
8440 Reche Vista Dr. Colton, CA 92324
April 1, 1991
Bob Jones
Hornet Chamber of Commerce
Military Affairs Committee
Page 2
Your help in retaining this unit at March will not only provide an
opportunity for your citizens to serve our country, but will provide
essential AERIAL WILDFIRE FIREFIGHTING SERVICES to the drought
stricken areas of Southern California and Humanitarian airlift
missions to Central and South America.
Once again, the Committees approach is multi-faceted. We intend to keep
the 943rd T.A.G. at March, facilitate the transfer of the 445th M.A.W. from
Norton, and encourage the Air Force to relocate the Space Systems
Division to March A.F.B.
Based on overwhelming community support to retain the 943rd T.A.G. at
March A.F.B., we request the Hemet Chamber of Commerce Military Affairs
Committee, support the "Committee to Save the 943rd T.A.G.".
We respectfully request the Hemet M.A.C. to ask their respective Chamber
of Commerce and City Council to pass Resolutions of support and ask that
they write letters to Congressman Brown and Congressman McCandless
insisting the Air Force's decision to deactivate the 943rd be revisited.
I have attached a list of names and addresses where support letters
should be mailed. We look forward to seeing you at the meeting on
4/10/91. Please call if you have any questions.
Respectfully,
Scott Lisk - Chairman
"Committee to Save the 943rd T.A.G."
enc.
".CommitteE to Sc hc 43rd T.A.G."
i-omt Paper
943rd Tactical Airlift Group
Air Force Reserve
ch Air Force Base, California
943rd TAG (March)
Civilian Payroll: $5,273,000.00
Military Payroll:
$4,061,000.00
Local Services
& Equipment
& Supplies
$1,499,000.00
445th MAW (Norton)
Operations
& Maintenance
& Civilian Payroll:
Military Payroll:
$12,454,000.00
$19,416,000.00
PRESENT
FUTU
943rd TAG ( ch)
Fulltime Jobs:
Parttime Jobs:
C-130 Hercules
Aircraft
Firefighting Support (cumulative
Retardant Drops
Pounds of Retardant
445th MAW (Norton)
Fulltime Jobs:
Parttime Jobs:
C-141 Starlifter
Aircraft
151
0
450
8
0
since 1985)
415
O (after April 1993)
11.39 million O (after April 1993)
274
189
3,018
1,763
36. 16
Scott Lisk, Chairman
(714) 824-0477
8440 Reche Vista Dr. Colton, CA 92324
"Cc ro m
OBJECTIVE
To Timely organize local grass roots support from the Inland Empire to Save the
943rd Tactical Airlift Group.
GOALS
Retain the 943rd T.A.G. at March A.F.B.
• Save 150 full-time jobs.
• Save 450 part-time jobs.
• Continue Cash Flow into Community through Taxes, Services, Retail Sales.
"Approximately $12,000,000 Annually"
• Retain aerial firefighting services in California.
• Retain humaitarian airlift operations.
2. Double size of Unit or Robust (bring up unit strength to level of their active duty
counterparts).
Per: F Y 91 Defense Authorization Bill.
Accept C-130s from Air Force Transfer of Tactical Airlift est. Sept. 92'.
Create approximately 1000-1100 - full & part-time jobs.
Obtain new aircraft & support services ( H Model C -130s )
If Congressional support is obtained this will bring additional people into community
for training, exercises, jobs and related services.
4. Support the 445 M.A.W. move from Norton A.F.B. to March
Apx. 2000 full & part-time jobs are associated with this move, eventually some of
these people will move into our communities, permanently.
445th M.A.W. move adds jobs which will help offset loss of jobs that were lost when
the 22nd Air Refueling Wing lost 14 KC-135A Air Refueling Aircraft.
5. Support the Space Systems Division move from L.A. to March A.F.B.
Scott Lisk, Chairman
(714) 824-0477
8440 Reche Vista Dr. Colton, CA 92324
"Corinmiff
943rd T.A.L."
LETTERS OF SUPPORT AND COPIES OF THE
APPROVED RESOLUTION SHOULD BE ADDRESSED
TO:
The Honorable Senator John Seymour
Suite 902
Hart Senate Office Building
Washington D.C. 20510
(202) 224-3841
The Honorable Senator Alan Cranston
Chairman, Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee
Suite 112
Hart Senate Office Building
Washington D.C. 20510
(202) 224-3553
The Honorable Robert Presley
Senator, 36th District
Suite 4048
State Capitol Building
Sacramento, California 95814
The Honorable Al McCandless
U.S. Congressman
37th Congressional District
435 Cannon Building
Washington D.C. 20515
The Honorable A. Norton Younglove
Supervisor, Fifth District
County of Riverside
4080 Lemon Street
Riverside, California 92501
(714) 275-1050
The Honorable David Kelley
Assemblyman, 73rd District
4158 State Capitol Building
Sacramento, California 95814
The Honorable Steve Clute
Assemblyman, 68th District
Room 4167
State Capitol
Sacramento, California 95814
Scott Lisk, Chairman
(714) 824-0477
8440 Reche Vista Dr. Colton, CA 92324
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
FROM: Anna Vega, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Leave of absence request per section 5.5
DATE: April 1, 1991
Per the Miscellaneous Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
section 5.5, Grace Martinez is requesting a leave of absence
without pay for a period of 32 days which will commence on
April 8, 1991 through May 21, 1991.
This is technically a maternity leave of absence of
which is not compensated by the city other than the use of
their sick and vacation time. Therefore it requires a leave
without pay.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Grace Martinez leave of absence without pay from
April 8, 1991 through May 21, 1991.
MEMO
TO: Ana A. Vega
Finance Director
FROM: Grace MartinezPA
SUBJ: Maternity Leave
DATE: March 15, 1991
This memo will serve as my request for maternity leave
which will commence on March 18, 1991. Per my doctor's
advice, my estimated time to return to work will be on
May 22, 1991. Please see attached doctor's slip. My
time accrual in the book is 15 days which will cover the
period between March 18 thru April 5, 1991. I will be
on leave of absence between the period of April 8, 1991
thru May 21, 1991.
I will keep your office informed of any changes in my
schedule.
cc: Payroll Dept.
MS
MEMORANDUti
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mayor and Member of the City Council
Pam aster, City Manager U
April 12, 1991
Contract with Warnecke and Associates
As you are aware, the City currently has a contract with Warnecke
and Associates for the design of the Civic Center, Fire Station and
Council Chambers'. The Contract is divided into five parts. The
first four phases have been completed by the architect and all fees
for those services have been paid by the City. The Contract also
makes the fifth phase, optional.
The Contract permits either party to cancel the contract upon 30
days written notice. The Contract also gives the City the option
to "suspend" the Contract upon written notice to the architect.
Councilwoman Leahy approached me regarding her interest to cancel
the Contract. I asked City Attorney Cox to review the Contract and
to provide his opinion. Mr. Cox advises that the Contract creates
no obligation on the City to undertake construction and, thereby,
invoke Phase 5 of the Contract. He further advises that the City
Manager could send written notice to Warnecke and Associates
advising them of the City's intent to indefinitely suspend the
Contract. If the architectural firm did not then cancel the
Contract, we would reserve the right to reinstate if we wanted to.
I would recommend that the City Council authorize the City Manager
to suspend the Contract with Warnecke and Associates. When a
final recommendation is made by the Civic Center Council
Subcommittee and accepted by the Council, a letter could be sent
to Warnecke cancelling the Contract.
nr
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: April 12, 1991
SUBJ: PARKLAND RESOLUTION NO. 1955
APPLICANT: CITY INITIATED
While analyzing the issue of parkland ratios, staff determined the
General Plan should contain parkland standards for the City. Staff
will begin the process for amendment to the General Plan to include
the required standards. In the meantime, staff has proposed
Resolution 1955 establishing interim parkland standards for your
consideration. The standards will apply until such time as the
permanent standards are in place.
In preparing these standards, staff used as a reference The New
Assembly Act: Parkland Dedication and Fees Handbook, by the
California Conservation and also consulted with Sam Goepp of Valley
Wide Recreation.
Staff recommends the adoption of Resolution No. 1955 establishing
interim Park Guidelines for the City.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:sh
RESOLUTION No. 1955
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
ESTABLISHING INTERIM PARK
STANDARDS FOR THE CITY.
WHEREAS, park and recreational facilities benefit the
Citizen of the City; and
WHEREAS, additional growth requires the addition of park and
recreation facilities; and
WHEREAS, State law requires the adoption of an Aesthetics
Cultural and Recreation Element with the General Plan.
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 66477 indicates the City
should adopt standards for park and recreational facilities.
BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that interim park and recreation
standards are established as follows:
1. The appropriate ratio of park and recreational land per
1,000 population is 5 acres.
2. Park and recreational facilities shall normally be a
minimum of six acres and shall include the following:
a. Turf playfield with not more than 5% slope 3
acres.
b. Children play apparatus, .75 acres.
c. Landscape park-like with quiet areas, 1 acre.
d. Family picnic area, .75 acres
e. Hardsurface game courts area, such as basketball,
or shuffleboard courts, .5 acres.
Where deemed necessary by City staff, lighted and improved
playing fields shall be constructed within the required turf
playfield.
3. Park and recreation facilities as small as 2 acres may
be included in the overall park acreage calculation if they
contain at least 50% turf playfield and at least 2 of the other
amenities mentioned above. Parks of less than 6 acres shall not
conStitute more than 25% of the City's overall park area.
4. Ideally there should be swimming facilities for the
residents of San Jacinto, totalling 15 sq. ft. of water surface
for each 3% of the population. (The population of developments
with swimming pool meeting this rating, but not less than 500 sq.
ft. of surface area shall be excluded from the population total.)
5. The planning commission is directed to commence a
General Plan Amendment to establish permanent park and
recreational standards for the City.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED on the day of , 1991.
ATTEST:
Mayor
Deputy City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
The forgoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution
duly adopted by the said City Council of the City of San
32 Jacinto on the date set forth therein.
Deputy City Clerk
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
A
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
April 12, 1991
Change Order No. 1 & 2
Western Landscaping Construction
Attached are change orders 1 and 2 to the City's contract with
Western Landscaping Construction. Change order No. 1 is a
reduction in the contract price as a result in a change in valves
in order to receive an extended warranty for the controller system.
Change order No. 2 is necessary due to the change in field
conditions after the rain (extra erosion).
Funds to pay for these changes are contained within the budget for
Community Facilities District No. 2.
Staff recommends approval of change orders 1 and 2.
Respectfully Submitted,
11-4(
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:lr
PART I - PROCEDURAL DOCUMENTS
SECTION 11
CHANGE ORDER
Order No. 1
Date: April 10, 1991
Agreement Date:
Sheet of
AGENCY: City of San Jacinto CFD #2, Phase I
PROJECT: Park, On-Site Flood Control Channels, Landscaping, Irrigation, and
related work.
CONTRACTOR: Western Landscape Construction
The following changes are hereby made to the Contract Documents:
To furnish and install rainbird EFB-CP valves in lieu of griswold 2000 series
JUSTIFICATION
CHANGE TO CONTRACT PRICE
Original Contract Price
Current Contract Price adjusted by
Previous Change Order(s)
Contract Price due to this Change Order
will be decreased
New Contract Price including this
Change Order
2,502,594.26
(7,122.00)
2,495,472.26
PART I - PROCEDURAL DOCUMENTS
SECTION 11
CHANGE ORDER
Order No. 2
Date: April 10, 1991
Agreement Date:
Sheet of
AGENCY: City of San Jacinto CFD #2, Phase I
PROJECT: Park, On-Site Flood Control Channels, Landscaping, Irrigation, and
related work.
CONTRACTOR: Western Landscape Construction
The following changes are hereby made to the Contract Documents:
Repair erosion caused by rain as per proposal by WH Baker plus mark up and
bond cost
JUSTIFICATION
CHANGE TO CONTRACT PRICE
Original Contract Price
Current Contract Price adjusted by
Previous Change Order(s)
Contract Price due to this Change Order
will be increased
New Contract Price including this
Change Order
2,502,594.26
2,495,472.26
27,644.00
2,523,116.26
CHANGE TO CONTRACT TIME
Contract Time will be remain the same
(Calendar Days)
Date for Completion of all Work
August 27, 1991
(Date)
APPROVALS REQUIRED
Approved by:
City of San Jacinto (Date)
Accepted by:
Contractor (Date)
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
April 12, 1991
Change Order No. 6
Matich Corporation
The City's consultants, NBS/Lowry and Byerly and Associates have
analyzed the damage to Las Rosas and Villines, north of Esplanade
and have made recommendations as the reconstruction necessary to
repair the storm damage. The City solicited bids for the repair
work and received bids from Matich Corporation in the amount of
$18,264.00, and Western Landscaping in the amount of $25,162.00.
This work will need to be completed as early as possible to avoid
interference with the landscape project.
Staff recommends the City Council award the contract to Matich
Corporation as specified in their proposal. The contract will be
con s idered change order No. 6 to the existing Matich contract with
the City. Funding for this change order will be the Community
Facilities District budget.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:lr
PART I - PROCEDURAL DOCUMENTS
SECTION 11
CHANGE ORDER
Order No. 6
Date: April 12, 1991
Agreement Date:
Sheet 1 of 2
AGENCY: City of San Jacinto CFD #2
PROJECT: COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 2, STREET IMPROVEMENT
CONTRACTOR: MATICH CORPORATION
The following changes are hereby made to the Contract Documents:
Street repairs caused by the heavy rains at Las Rosas and
Villines, north of Esplanade.
CHANGE TO CONTRACT PRICE
Original Contract Price
$2,432,563.50
Current Contract Price adjusted by $3,159,438.91 Previous Change Order(s)
Contract Price due to this Change Order $ 18,264.00 will be increased.
New Contract Price including this $3,177,702.91 Change Order
CHANGE TO CONTRACT TIME
Contract Time will be increase
(Calendar Days)
Date for Completion of all Work
(Date)
APPROVALS REQUIRED
Approved by:
City of San Jacinto (Date)
Accepted by:
Contractor (Date)
PR4.17'-"zt
s....•!;74
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: January 18, 1991
SUBJ: AMENDMENT TO TRACT 26020-1
The applicant proposes a change to lots 22 and 23 of the final map of 26020-1. The
changes proposed are shown on sheet 3 of 4 as amended detail.
City Council approval of the proposed change is necessary prior to recordation of the
amendments.
Respectfully Submitted,
Brian McNabb
Director of Community Development
IN TI^E CI1Y OF SAN JACINTO. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA AMENDED TRACT NO. 26020-1 MIMS A SUODIVISION OF A FORUM OF LOT 1e OF H.T . WHITT •8 PLAT OF SAN JACDITO. M. O. 5/3116. RECORDS OF SAN DIE SO COUNTY. CALIFCAN/A. AND PORTION3 DF LOT S. LOT 13 AND )(UHLER AVENUE (VACATED) OF MILER RANCH TRACT ADDITION. N. 1) 5/51. RECO= OF RIVEFSIDE COUNTY. CALIFOR11IA EarceIll WATERER - . ME /7 III DU OF L AT JT TV s. IT. e PARES RENDES OF CITY CLER No. •S AT OLD MOUNTAIN WAO ASSOCIATES, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHip PACIFIC. DO.. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. GENERAL Al 1. AT r: I OCATTA/ /laINSAA7$1 134?-11)f [ITT 0.80* arr OF SW JACINTO CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS AMENDED MAP HAS SEEN EXAMINED BY ME OA UNOER NY SUPERVISION ANO FOUNO TO BE AN EXACT COPY OF TIE ORIGINAL MAP AS RECORDED EXCEPT FOP THE CORRECTIONS SHOW HEREON ANO THAT THIS MAP COMPLIES WITH TIE SAROIVICSION NAP ACT AS RECulAED BY SECTION 56472.1 OF DE SOYERMENT CODE. TAX COLLECTORS CENTIF/CATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE AS. OF THIS SATE. MERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE PROPERTY STOW ON THE WITHIN MAP FOR UNPAID STATE. COUNTY. MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSEsSNENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES. NOW A LIEN MT Not YET PAYABLE MUCH ARE ESTIMATED TO HE S ,2000.00 DATEX 19 R. WAYbE NAM.. SLANT TAX CELLEL-ToR DEFuTt TAX IWO 1WTIFICATE I HEREBY CIATIFy THAT A RIND IN THE Sum CF $ .2.000-00k5EX SEEN EXECUTED AND FILED WITH THE MIAMI OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA. CONDITIONED UPON THE PATIENT OF ALL TAXES. STATE, COUNTY. IONICIPAL al LOCAL. MO ALL SPECIAL ASSanSENTS COLLECTS) AS TAXES WHICH, AT TEE TOE RE FILMS OF THIS Fop WITH THE COUNTY RECORDER ARE A LIEN AsADET SAID PROPERTY BUT OCT YET PAYABLE AC) SAID BONO HAS SEEN DULY SAID BOARD OF BPSHISCPS. - DATE AM.F2e° rrffqc. GERALD A, NALONEY CASH TAX BONO f CLERK OF DE BOAR) OF SuPENTISORS IL %FRE WATTS. COUNTY TAX SELECTOR Br BE ..../tima.c..0 LAX,' DOWRY DEPUTY DATE/ .-14"/ air 19S, 2X1. eF ,R.C.E.9212 ‘CST EiMEER, CITY OESAN JACATIS THE AMP rs con:RECTO) AS FoLLORS, THE oftorNAL LOT DeNETWONS ARE CROSSED Our New., JULY 1990 IS SUFFICII3ff TO eaADLE THE AS ANCIAL CALIFORNIA REPO:SEWS A : THAT ARE CORRECTLY SHOWN. OR RECORDATION OF THIS RAF. THE ASSET TO RE RETRACED. THE DAREY .5 STATIDENT STATE THAT I AN A RESISTERED CIVIL ENSUED) SF TINE ST THAT THIS NAP COMISTDAS OF NNW , 147 SHEETS NODE UNDER Dry SUPERVISION DISUNG SHOWN HEREON ACTIAM.Y RE IN PLACE DATED Das PeLmAnct. NI 26406 TION yES"PE RECORDER'S. STATENENT FILED THIS DAY CAP TS AT OF MAPS AT PAGES AT THE REQUEST OF THE CLERK OF THE BOARD. W. FEE WILLIAM E. CHIEFLY. 031.3411 RECDFCER DEPUTY SCHEER'S STATDENT ATE THAT I HAVE EXAN/NED THE WITHIN ANNEXED 0ROIVISION"S0OAW5 HEREON IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SANE AS IT TENTATIVE NAP: THA THE PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVIS THE SAN JACINTO CITY 0R1YHIAlEE NO. 573 HAVE SATISFIED THAT MIS PAP IS DATED. THIS --/f DAY CF ICIER. CITY CF SAN JAcDrox CAL PLANNING CONNISSION STATE:TENT THIS MAP. TRACT NO. ncozo-n Is A PERT/ON OF THE OR/SINAL TENTATIVE HAP OF TRACT No. 100710 SAID TENTATIVE NAP WAS APPROVED BY TIE CITY OF SAN JAC/NTO PLANN/NS COW/5510N IN ACCORDANCE BOTH THE LAW IN A DULY AUTIONIZES rEETINS HELD _ IV . CITY CE JACHRO. ru TEDFNIA SECRETARY. CITY OF SAM JAcINTO PLANNHE ccooessioN DATED THIS DAY DP Sel-F.-FrEA 19 2. PUBLIC WORM DIRECTOR•3 APPROVAL TEE NEE I DEDICATIONS AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOW ON TIE WITHIN ANNEXED NAP AVE HEREBY APPROVED THIS /Or- DAY CF SERY-wAt 19 2. PLELIc wows DIRECTOR CITY OF SAN JACINTO SOIL REPORT A PRELININARy SOIL NEEDN'T WAS PREPARED BY woorwwwwwwwwo 1110. TN THE 22510 DAY Of MARCH 19 no AS REOUIRED BY THE HEALTH AWN SAFETY cOOE OF CALIFORNIA. SECTION 17953, •5 STATETENT HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE THE MEM OF THE LAM INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHONN HEREOF/ THAT WE APE THE ONLY PERSONS WOE CONSENT IS ACCESSARY TO PASS A CLEAR TITLE TO SAID LAM/ THAT ME CONSENT TO HE HAKIM AWN RECOSIO/NE OF THIS suSOIVISIENI NAP AS SHOWN WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LIME. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF SANJACINTIL FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PUAPOSES. LOTS 'A TWOUGH 'Cr. INCLUSIVE. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO LOTS Dr &NO I. III ONE SW SATIRIST STRIPS. FOR NW/ 1.70 ACCESS CONTROL. AS A CONDITION OF DEDICATION OF LOT A. THE INNERS OF Lois I TIMMS S. - MU/SM. AND OW THROUSH 23. DO-USIVE ASIIIIINS THIS HIEDAY AND DIMING SUCH TINE WILL HAVE NO R/SHTS OF ACCESS EXCEPT THE WEEEPAL EASEMENT OF TRAVEL. ANY CHANGE OF ALIGNSENT On WIDTH THAT RESULTS IN THE VACATION THEREOF SHALL TERMINATE THIS CONDITION OF ACCESS RIOHTS AS TO THE PART VACATED. ENGINEER'S STATEMENT I. MICHAEL J. STF.AANS„ HERESY STATE THAT I AN A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER IN TEE STATE OF CAL/FORN/A AM) THAT THIS RIP WAS PREPARED MEER Ary SUPERVISION, THE CORRECTIONS SHOW HEREON WERE WADE TO CORRECT POSITIONS OF LOT LINES AC) CORRECT A Blowy NAVE. DATE QLJ NICHAEL .1. STEARNS, R.C.E. 28405 DE FEE DIVERS AFFECTED SY THESE CONFECTIONS AVE OLD MOUNTAIN ROAD ASSOC1A NOTARy AONOWEDGENENT STATE CF CALIFORNIA COUtOT OF R.Trwsom ) ON THIS 77m DAY OF ALIETWT 19 BEFORE IE. 500001. sue ylssErc A NOTARY AWL= IN AND FOR SAID STATE. PERSONALLy APPEARED GERALD 0. rucE Amp own,- A...yr:NNW PERSCNAU_T KNOW TO NE OR PROVED TO NE ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSONS INC EXECUTED THE WITHIN DETRIMENT AS PRF_SIDENT ADD VICE prrEswyENT oF rwort-yorwo pacepo, A CALIFORNIA ODWORATION. TOE CORPORATION THAT EXECUTED THE WITHIN OrSTRUNENT. AC) mows TO FE TO SE THE RENSONS NC EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUNENT ON BEHALF OF SAID CORPORATION. SAID CORPORATION BEDE A GENERAL PARTNER OF wo wwww10 orws c0nco1ATE8 THE UNITED PAJONERSNIR THAT EXECUTED THE RITOIII INSTRUNEWT ANO ACKNOWELMED TO PE THAT SAID coRPCPATTON SECUTED TEE SANE AS SAID GENERAL PANDER A14, THAT SAID LIMITED PARTNERSHIP EXECUTED DE NITNEsS NY HANO r OFFICIAL SEAL, NOTARY PUBLIC IN AN3 FM SAID STATE III COHNISSION EXPIRES 4E-A Hf115010..00 8.4.- 14,1C. NBS/LOWRY ENGINEERS C PLANNERS- CITY ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO. COuray OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFOONIA, BY AAO THROUSH ITS ouLY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS. HEREBY APPROVES SAID FINAL NAP AND ACCEPTS THE DEDICATIoNs Roam HEREON FOR PUBLIC ROAM Aso PUBLIC UTILITY PuRPOSES. THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF MTV 5770.6(5 IS CONTINSEXT 000014 THE CONPLETION OF AU. STREET INPROYENENTS. LOTS *kr AND • I. It) ONE FOOT RADIATES STRIPS. ARE ACCEPTED CoNTISSENT UPON THE WINONA/ 9010 INPRONEINIAT IF THE STREETS. THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ALSO ACCEPTS THE OFFER OF ABUTTERS ROWS OF ACCESS ALONG EDT WAS OEINCATEO. •:7;:,;‘•?;`2,41W,*_. DATED THIS PtA DAY OF SAC.Ou4S4r. 11 .21- M R22'/
so* 100 200 14 15 1 16 •40,61C311-W 100001$ (Narrifro9,21. 4,4,402. 44.114-9,1C1 4/477.4.• 004,01,4004.... 0400.00000100.0 01---, 2.1,1-44:7919 1 ECT1EEE-E 1.0t 7 24 0d4dddiE0C ortreter A ,0 NE • 4-r-3200- fr-541, L.• 10.4, AmENOETT DETAIL- K•0\kr .t& 0: A 1206188-96 .- dr;r07,1-E010 6000. Lar -I° t• Orruttelr STICtd VILLINE5 AVENUE 12 17 29 r 4 • 45 1 46 47 RS 56158 ENENNEERNO. NOTES (ONE 04400r FouNo 0.4404UMENT Dell•CIOPTIcoaln zo, 0d, 9 383 go EQ hr owl-0-m,— .rz a h ...-- s 27 I I / 8 10 11 18 serar,tect., ro..acrrmomo Aloy45.. 60.ftb• sl r.44,43-9,w 40 2 Nark LAE. 420,54.e. 0ASSIfi ct102vE Curre. -r.40,11c ,...rorkeer• 00.0o. TS-1 NO 23671 41 ex.d.Rtem ora, 1 30 14 00140ORL, o WAN' LIrr IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AMENDED TRACT NO. 26020 1 SEIM A agraxvzs.ico OF A PORTION OF LOT 18 Of H.T. HEWITT'S AT OF SAN JACINTO. M.O. a/vms. RECORDS OF SAN DIEM COUNTY. ruTFORNIA. AND PORTIMS OF LOT a, LOT 13 AM) WUNLER AVENUE (VACATED) OF KUMLER RANCH TRACT ADDITION. M.S. 5/51. RMORDS OF RrAUKUME COUNTY. CALIFORNIA. W IN FEET NBS/LOIMY...ENSINEERS 6 PLANNERS_ JULY 1990 / A," MB 8151 HT HEWITT'S PLAT OF SAN JACINTO MB 81385 SD CO REC El 225/2
so 1.20 ISO ,v-sx-ove SHAVER STREET ....—k18,52SS,V 505_5, —.....„ - C.: --- 550..so. ,...„..1, LOT 9 oso_o LOT t• BAR4nEat 57121P OONT RE.Oce 1-eale 1-Crr 191+54 L4p.P.04. Lx..een&a) NES/LONRY..-.ENGINEERS S FLAJOIERS JULY 1990 SOUNDARY, RIGHT-OF-WAY 15, LOTS 22 El 25 see AMENDED DETAIL BELOW. EIRSTMEENDS TICIT1ES suPEET FOUND A407E/MEM DeOC.X1PTI000WO (SEE S.EETA•1 1,55.20 1 -*ROO 1 6000 uorr*-- te..211. — "7' PErYST'S5,4• SHAVER Neer'SIT5Rew Pri• STREET -6114.0.134.1,49. Ma* *0989000009855 1 22 23 .^. LOT OSPREY yo zJ 4 0 ST R E Er on .6.214# Of 4M 7. S - w 5481-5.2.9, 10000. AM ENDED DETAIL CURVE DATA R.•n••.2. 0.2.14. 1.1 . 7. Iiil221=1211111111NEINNE IIESRICIEDE.P.11CII-2511111 —1‘..r.cic.:..ARI•• 1111EMEINIIPIIRIck..Y.M1 Ilplek4141111111111 • "CarMEMIRMIEFEIMINM11110111111HESIENIM Gr.MaP21/11111118NROMIELMDINS nIIN.,:,,,,,,. BILM.1311111111111111C111111131MWAIR .11M79. 111111111LEIWAIlleardilll K.*. SerSflrw RBI'''ST $00.00. MErs-ST3,-00 toco, Nerrsr”,! 44 35 28 . EARKNI NOTES AEASEMENT FOR POLE LINES ANOFOR lAGERGROUND FACILITIES IN FAVOR OF SD. CALIF. EDITOR CO. PER INST. NO. 125913 RECORDED JULY 2L OCR 0.11. MO INST. NO. 195750 PECCADED OCT. 27. /972. EA. SEE IN TNE CITY OF SAN JACEWR% COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA AMENDED TRACT NO. 26020-1 MEM A 111.1101V13/01 OF A PORTION OF LOT 15 OF N.T. PEVITT'S AT CF SAK JACDITO. N.D. WES. MOMS OF MI DIEDO COUNTY. CALIFORNTA. AID PORTIONS OF LOT S. LOT Is AND KUNLED AVENUE (VACATED) OF KUPLETI RANCH TRACT ADOITION. 11.5. 5/51. mama cs, Fame= CCUTTY. CAL/FORNIA. RALE rm OW t_2\ EASEMENT FOR PIPELINES IN FAVOR OF EASTERN MUNICIPAL MATER 01ST. PER INST. 320357 RGC.00772O /990, 0
. 060 . ISO 15n2!!!iinI SEE EASEMENT NOTES osts eNewr 93 C.LIPEV111 DATA,. PM OS, 1.P..0,164 lam • ask.NA•a......556. SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETS IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFCfMA AMENDED TRACT NO. 26020-I BEM A ausicaviszom OF A PORTION OF LOT 18 OF H.T. HEWITT'S PUT OF SAN JACDRO. NAL RECCFIDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA. AND PORTIMS OF LOT S. LOT 13 AND )(UHLER AVENUE (VACATED) OF KUNLER RANCH TRACT ADDITION. M.8. 8/51. 0ECCF133 OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. CALWOFNMA. BEALE 36 1001 NBS/LOWRY...ENSDMEERS & PLANNERS JULY 1990 ENGINEER'S NOTES 1. THIS TRACT HAS 47 LOTS PLUS LOTS .A. STROUGH *J°. INCLUSIVE. 2. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 12.99 ACAES WITHIN TYE DISTIA=IVE 0=3E5 LINE. F=232 0 e 1.41. ICITALS 3042 POW Pm +W. a MI 284/00.1. 3. ALL PUBLIC UTILITIES ANO PUBLIC SERvICES INSTALLED WITHIN THIS TRACT SHALL BE PLACED SCERCROUNE 4. 100X3/4 GAUL. 19005 PIPE 0/CONC. CD% SET FLUSH ANO TACGED RCE 26405 OR LEAO:AND.T4ERCE,26406-SET coNC.: FOOTING DREE.TOP 65. CONC:'BrOCK wAtE AT ALE REAR.LOT CORNERS AND. CORNER CL5BACX5;5, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. LS 2031 96 v.v. PCB pm 16290 1,014 mg 5. LOT cONNERs 60J52051 TO STREETS REFERENCED BY LEAD AND TAG GEE 26+06 IN CURD ON EXTENSION OF LOT LIMBIC EXCEPT AT CoRNER CUTBACKS. 6. 0 INOICATES 24-12' GAIT. IRON PIPE *TONG_ CORE ANO METAL DISC STOOPED ROE 26406 SET FLUSH. UNLESS OTHER.ISE NOTED 7. 6 INDICATES STREET SURvEy NONumENT SET PER CITY OF SAN JAC/NT0 STANCMOS 6-900, 0-9006 ANO 0-901. O. < S INDICATES NEASURED ANO REMO° PER PM 45/59. 9. 1 ) INDICATES RECCRO DATA PER P. 45/51 UNLESS OTHEMIsE NOTED, 70. C I INOIcATEs MEASURED 414:1 RecoRO PER oe 206/88-96. 11. BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP IS THE CENTER LINE OF EvANs. STREET TAAEN AS N8945465, PER 00 206180-96. 12. 0 INDICATES NONUNENT FOUND. SEE 'FOUTS) mONuNENT DESCRIPTIONS' THIS SHEET. 13. A INDICATES CITY OF SAN JACINTO STREET SURvEY MONUMENT FOUND PER me 206/06-36. INDICATES ACCESS mows RESTRICTED. S/CNATIME MISSIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 66436 OF THE sueDivisioN MAP ACT. THE SIGNATURES OF THE F901055I56 OWNERS OF EASEMENTS ANO/OR OTHER INTERESTS HAVE BEEN 0*4I11E24 I. A RIGHT OF WAY FOR ONE DITCH. FLUME 044 DINER AOUEDUCT. ACROSS THE LANDS OF ANY OTHER OwNER LYING BETWEEN HIM AGO THE SAN JACINTO RIVER, AS RESERVED TO EACH ANO EVERY DOPER OF LAGOS IN THE RANCHO SAN JACINTO VIEJO. HIS HEIRS ANO ASSIGNS. BY DECREE OF PARTITION OF SAID RANCHO RECOROED IN BOOK 43 PAGE 181 CF 1FF134. 6(09405 OF SAN 01E60 MUNN. CALIFORNIA. 2. CITIZENS MATER CO. OF SAN JACINTO--RIGHT TO DEVELOP, TAKE EXPORT C APPROPRIATE ALL WATER TOGETHER WITH THE NECESSARY APPURTENANCES ARK EASEMENTS PER INST. RECORDED DEC. L 1915 IN aK 341 PG. 195 OF DEEDS. SAID EASENENTS CANNOT BE LOCATED FAO. RECORDED. 3.. FRUITVALE NUTUAL WATER CO. C E TERN MUNICIPAL NATER 01ST. --EASEMENTS FOR WATER LINES ANO RIGHT TO DEVELOP. TAKE, EXPORT C AP OPRIATE 415 WATER PER INST. RECORDED SEPT. 13. 1935 IN OK 246 PG. 502, G.R. AND INST. NO. 825 RECORDED MAY 5, 1972. 0 n SAIO EASENENTS CANNOT BE LOCATED FAO. nECORO. C> 14,1,0 .LS 2,0310. Or PERIl MP. ms ® e 1.41. MRAS LS 001 Cus. 0,2 POI Pa Mita Ma Imr. m. Ant, LOC Emma ST. 6 0s. LIP* tor 53. M KISS. 0 1.P. 1.01 0m. 0.r pan Pm 49196-519 TM ACE Mama ACCOmS0 rt. Cam. LOT IL M MO APO Aa. Sr AAA 9a0 /4150 now mg COM. LOT C> I" 0.41. mus Ls 005 RN. 590 13014<. 00 m smss.
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: April 12, 1991
SUBJ: Community Development Filing Fees
Information concerning the proposed filing fees will be delivered to you on Monday,
April 15, 1991.
Respectfully,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:lr
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: April 12, 1991
SUBJ: ORDINANCE NO. 932
APPLICANT: CITY INITIATED
In accordance with your direction, staff consulted with the City
attorney and determined the City can adopt a parkland standard of
5 acres per 1,000 population. This is based on the ratio of
parkland in existence within the City in 1988 and the associated
population.
Ordinance No. 932 has been revised accordingly and is resubmitted
to you for consideration. Staff recommends adoption.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:sh
Park Land Dedication Formula Table
- / Average // Acreage/DU
Types of Dwellings Density/DU / (3 ac. std.)
Single-Family Detached 2.918
Single-Family Attached 1.747
2-4 units 2.559
5+ units 2.236
Mobilehomes 1.614
.0088
.0052
.0077
.0067
.0
ORDINANCE NO. 932
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
A CALIFORNIA MUNICIPALITY, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR
DEDICATION -OF LAND, PAYMENT OF FEES, OR BOTH, FOR PARK AND
2
RECREATION LAND IN SUBDIVISIONS AND ON SINGLE PARCELS AND THE
REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 596.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
4 FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Purpose. This ordinance is enacted pursuant to
the authority granted by Section 66477 of the Government Code of
the State of California. The park and recreation facilities for
which dedication of land and/or payment of a fee is required by
this ordinance are in accordance with the "Aesthetics, Cultural,
and Recreation Resources Element" of the General Plan of the City
of San Jacinto, adopted by the City of San Jacinto on May 5, 1987.
SECTION 2. Requirements. At the time of approval of the
tentative map or parcel map, the City Planning Commission shall
determine pursuant to Section 4 hereof the land required for
dedication or in lieu fee payment. As a condition of approval of
a final subdivision map or parcel map, the subdivider iall
dedicate land, pay a fee in lieu thereof, or both, at the option
of the City Planning Commission, for neighborhood and community
park or recreation purposes at the time and according to the
standards and formula contained in this ordinance.
SECTION 3. General Standard. It is hereby found and
deteLmined that the public interest, convenience, health, welfare,
and safety require that five acres of property for each 1,000
persons residing with this city be devoted to local park and
recreational purposes.
SECTION 4. Formula for dedication of land. Where a park or
recreation facility has been designated in the "Aesthetics,
Cultural, and Recreational Resources Element", an element of the
general plan of the city, and is to be located in whole or in part
within the proposed subdivision to serve the immediate and future
needs of the residents of the subdivision, the subdivider shall
dedicate land for a local park sufficient in size and topography
that bears a reasonable relationship to serve the present and
future needs of the residents of the subdivision.
The amount of land to be provided shall be determined pursuant to
the following formula:
minimum
Average No. of Persons/Unit divided by 1,000 population = acreage
5 dedication
The following table of population density has been established
pursuant to Section 66477(b) of the Government Code:
Dedication of the land shall be made in accordance with the
procedures contained in Section 12 hereof.
For the purposes of this section, the number of new dwelling units
shall be based upon the number of parcels indicated on the map when
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
3
14
15
16
17
18
9
20
2
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Page 1
in an area zoned for one dwelling per parcel. When all or part of
the subdivision is located in an area zoned for more than one
dwelling unit per parcel, the number of proposed dwelling units in
the area so zoned shall equal the maximum allowed under that zone.
In the case of -a condominium project, the number of new dwelling
2 units shall be the number of condominium units. The term "new
dwelling unit" does not include dwelling units lawfully in place
3 prior to the date on which the parcel or final map is filed.
4 The subdivider, shall, without credit: 1) provide full street
improvements and utility connections including, but not limited to
5 curbs, gutters, street paving, traffic control devices, street
trees, and sidewalks to land which is dedicated pursuant to this
6 section; 2) provide for fencing along the property line of that
portion of the subdivision contiguous to the dedicated land; 3)
7 provide improved drainage through the site; and 4) provide other
minimal improvements which the City Planning Commission determines
8 to be essential to the acceptance of the land for recreational
purposes.
9
The land to be dedicated and the improvements to be made pursuant
10 to this section shall be approved by the Director of Community
Development.
SECTION 5. Fee Requirements for New Residential Construction
Not Within a Subdivision. In addition to any other fee or fees
prescribed, every person constructing any new dwelling unit or
placing a mobilehome in the City on parcels, or in subdivision or
land divisions approved prior to the adoption of this ordinance,
unless there has been prior agreement for park dedication in lieu
of fees, shall pay to the City Treasurer a fee per the formula
established in Section 7. No land dedication is acceptable.
For purposes of this section, fair market value shall be the land
value as shown on the most current County of Riverside Assessor's
records.
18 SECTION 6. Formula for fees in lieu of land dedication.
(a) General Formula. If there is no park or recreation facility
19 designated in the "Aesthetics, Cultural, and Recreational Resources
Element", to be located in whole or in part within the proposed
20 subdivision to serve the immediate and future needs of the
residents of the subdivision, the subdivider shall, in lieu of
21 dedicating land, pay a fee equal to the value of that land, plus
20% toward costs of off-site improvements, prescribed for
22 dedication in Section 4 hereof and in an amount determined in
accordance with provisions of Section 7 hereof, such fee to be used
23 for a local park which bears a reasonable relationship to serve the
present and future residents of the area being subdivided.
For the purposes of this ordinance, off-site improvements are
25 defined as those improvements which would have been required if
land had been dedicated using the provisions of Section 4.
(b) Fees in Lieu of Land; 50 Parcels or Less. If the proposed
subdivision contains fifty (50) parcels or less, the subdivider
shall pay a fee equal to the land value, plus 20% toward costs of
off-site improvements, of the portion of the local park required
to serve the needs of residents of the proposed subdivision as
prescribed in Section 4 hereof and in an amount determined in
accordance with the provisions of Section 7 hereof.
However, nothing in this section shall prohibit the dedication and
acceptance of land for park and recreation purposes in subdivisions
of fifty parcels or less, where the subdivider proposes such
dedication voluntarily and the land is acceptable to the Planning
Commission.
(c) Use of Money. The money collected hereunder shall be used
only for the purpose of acquiring necessary land and developing new
Page 2
12
13
14
15
6
7
24
26
27
28
29
30
3
32
or rehabilitating existing park or recreation facilities reasonably
related to serving the subdivision.
SECTIoN.7.- Criteria for Requiring Both Dedication and Fee.
2 In subdivisions of more than fifty (50) parcels, the subdivider
shall both dedicate land and pay a fee in lieu thereof in
3 accordance with the following formula:
4 (a) When only a portion of the land to be subdivided is proposed
on the "Aesthetics, Cultural, and Recreational Resources Element"
5 as the site for a local park, such portion shall be dedicated for
local park purposes and a fee computed pursuant to the provision
6 of Section 7 hereof shall be paid for the value of any additional
land, plus 20% toward costs of off-site improvements, that would
7 have been required to be dedicated pursuant to Section 4 hereof.
(b) When a major part of the local park or recreation site has
already been acquired by the city and only a small portion of land
is needed from the subdivision to complete the site, such remaining
portion shall be dedicated and a fee computed pursuant to the
provision of Section 7 hereof shall be paid in an amount equal to
the value of the land, plus 20% toward the costs of off-site
inTP:ove -ments, which would otherwise have been required to be
dedicated pursuant to Section 4 hereof, such fees to be used for
the improvement of other local parks and recreation facilities in
the area serving the subdivision.
SECTION 8. Amount of Fee in Lieu of Land Dedication. When
a fee is to be paid in lieu of land dedication, the amount of such
fee shall be based upon the fair market value of the amount of land
which would otherwise be required for dedication pursuant to
Section 4, plus 20% toward costs of off-site improvements, such as
extension of utility lines. The fee shall be determined by the
following foLmula:
DUs X Pop X 5 acres X FMV = subtotal X 6/5 = in-lieu
DU 1,000 people Buildable acre fee
19 where
2011 DUs = Number of dwelling units as defined in Section 4
Pop = Population per dwelling unit
DU
FMV = Fair market value, as determined by Section 8
Buildable acre = A typical acre of the subdivision, with
a slope less than 10%, and located in
other than an area on which building is
excluded because of flooding, easements,
or other restrictions.
Fees to be collected pursuant to this section shall be approved by
the Director of Community Development.
SECTION 9. Determination of Fair Market Value. The fair
market value shall be determined by the city with a written
appraisal report prepared and signed by an appraiser acceptable to
the city. (Note: fee paid by applicant). The appraisal shall be
made immediately prior to the filing of the final map. The
subdivider shall notify the city of the expected filing date at
least six (6) weeks prior to filing of the final map. If more than
one (1) year elapses prior to filing the final map, the city will
prepare a new appraisal and will bill the subdivider for the cost
of the reappraisal. For the purposes of this chapter, the
determination of the fair market value of a buildable acre, as
defined in Section 7, shall consider, but not necessarily be
limited to, the following:
Page 3
8
9
0
1
2
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
1. approval of and conditions of the tentative subdivision map
2. the general plan
3. zoning
4. property location
211 5- off-site improvements facilitating use of the property
6. site characteristics of the property
3 If the subdivider objects to the determined fair market value,
411 he/she may appeal to the City Council who shall hear the appeal
under the same rules and obligations current for local board of
511 equalization hearings, except that the burden of proof shall lie
with the subdivider.
SECTION 10. Determination of Land or Fee. Whether the
Planning Commission accepts land dedication or elects to require
payment of a fee in lieu thereof, or a combination of both, shall
be determined by consideration of the following:
(a) The natural features, access, and location of land in the
subdivision available for dedication;
(b) The size and shape of the subdivision and land available
for dedication;
(c) The feasibility of dedication;
(d) The compatibility of dedication with the "Aesthetics,
Cultural, and Recreational Resources Element", and
14
(e) The location of existing and proposed park sites and
trailways.
16
17
The determination of the Planning Commission as to whether land
shall be dedicated, or whether a fee shall be charged, or a
combination thereof, shall be final and conclusive.
SECTION 11. Credit for Private Open Space. No credit shall
be given for private open space in the subdivision except as
hereinafter provided. Where private open space usable for active
recreational purposes is provided in a proposed planned development
or real estate development as defined in Sections 11003 and 11003.1
of the Business and Professions Code, partial credit, not to exceed
(50%), shall be given against the requirement of land dedication
or payment of fees in lieu thereof if the Planning Commission finds
that it is in the public interest to do so and that all the
following standards are met:
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
(a) yards, court areas, setbacks, and other open areas
equired by the zoning and building ordinances and regulations
shall not be included in the computation of such private open
space; and
(b) Private park and recreation facilities shall be owned by
a homes association composed of all property owners in the
subdivision and being an incorporated non-profit organization
capable of dissolution only by a 100% affirmative vote of the
membership, operated under recorded land agreements through which
each lot owner in the neighborhood is automatically a member, and
each lot is subject to a charge for a proportionate share of
expenses for maintaining the facilities.
(c) use of the private open space is restricted for park and
recreation purposes by recorded covenant which runs with the land
in favor of the future owners of the property and which cannot be
defeated or eliminated without the consent of the city or its
successor; and,
(d) The proposed private open space is reasonably adaptable
for use for park and recreation purposes, taking into consideration
Page 4
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
15
18
9
20
2
22
such factors as size, shape, topography, geology, access, and
location; and,
(e) Facilities proposed for the open space are in substantial
accordance with- the provisions of the "Aesthetics, Cultural, and
2 Recreational Resources Element" of the general plan; and,
3 (f) The open space for which credit is given is generally a
minimum of five acres and provides all of the local park basic
4 elements listed below, or a combination of such and other
recreation improvements that will meet the specific recreation
5 needs of future residents of the area:
6
(1) Recreational open spaces, which are generally
defined as park area for active recreation pursuits
7
such as soccer, golf, baseball, softball, and
football, and have at least one acre of maintained
8
turf with less than 5% slope.
9
(2) Court areas, which are generally defined as tennis
courts, badminton courts, shuffleboard courts, or
0 similar hard-surfaced areas especially designed and
exclusively used for court games.
Recreational swimming areas, which are defined
generally as fenced areas devoted primarily to
swimming, diving or both. They must also include
decks, lawn areas, bathhouses, or other facilities
developed and used exclusively for swimming and
diving and consisting of no less than 15 square feet
of water surface area per pool, together with an
adjacent deck and/or lawn area twice that of the
pool.
18
The determination of the Planning commission as to whether credit
1911 shall be given and the amount of credit shall be final and
conclusive.
24
30
(a) For any subdivision consisting of ten (10) or more lots, fees
31 shall be paid, in their entirety, prior to the issuance of any
building permit for any building or structure to be located upon
32 11 any lot in the subdivision.
(b) For any subdivision consisting of nine (9) or less lots, fees
shall be paid on a lot-by-lot basis and prior to the issuance of
any building permit for any building or structure to be located
Page 5
11
(3 ) 211
411
151i
upon any one of the lots in the subdivision.
Open space covenants for private park or recreation facilities
shall be submitted to the city prior to approval of the final
subdivision map or parcel map and shall be recorded
contemporaneously with final subdivision map or parcel map.
SECTION 13. Disposition of Fees. Fees determined pursuant
to Section 7 shall be paid to the City Treasurer and shall be
deposited into the subdivision park trust fund, or its successor.
Money in said fund, including accrued interest, shall be expended
solely for acquisition or development of parkland, or improvements
related thereto.
6
Collected fees shall be appropriated by the city to which the land
or fees are conveyed or paid for a specific project to serve
residents of the subdivision in a budgetary year within five years
upon receipt of payment or within five years after the issuance of
building permits on one-half of the lots created by the
subdivision, whichever occurs later.
10
11
12
If such fees are not so committed, these fees, less an
administrative charge, shall be distributed and paid to the then
record owners of the subdivisior, in the same proportion that the
size of their lot bears to the total area of all lots in the
subdivision per Section 66477 (f) of the Government Code.
The City Treasurer shall report to the City Council at least
annually on income, expenditures, and status of the subdivision
14 park trust fund.
15 SECTION 14. Exemptions. Subdivisions containing less than
five parcels and not used for residential proposes shall be
16 exempted from the requirements of this ordinance; provided,
however, that a condition shall be placed on the approval of such
17 parcel map that if a building permit is requested for construction
of a residential structure or structures on one or more of the
18 parcels the fee may be required to be paid by the owner of each
such parcel as a condition to the issuance of such permit.
19
The provisions of the ordinance do not apply to commercial or
20 industrial subdivisions; nor do they apply to condominium projects
or stock cooperatives which consist of the subdivision of airspace
21 in an existing apartment building which is more than five years old
when no new dwelling units are added.
22
SECTION 15. Subdivider-Provided park and Recreation
23 Improvements. The value of park and recreation improvements
provided by the subdivider to the dedicated land shall be credited
24 against the fees or dedication of land required by this ordinance.
25 The Planning Commission reserves the right to approve such
improvements prior to agreeing to accept the dedication of land and
to require in-lieu fee payments should the land and improvements
26 be unacceptable.
27
SECTION 16. Agency to Accept Land and Fees. Land or fees
required under this ordinance shall be conveyed or paid directly
28 to the local public agency which provides park and recreational
services on a community-wide level and to the area within which the
29 proposed development will be located, if such agency elects to
accept the land or fee. At the time of tentative map approval, the
30 Planning Commission shall determine whether the city is the
appropriate local agency. The city, county, or other local public
31 agency to which the land or fees are conveyed or paid shall develop
a schedule pursuant to Section 66477 of the Government Code
32 specifying how, when, and where it will use the land or fees, or
both., to develop park or recreational facilities to serve residents
of the subdivision.
SECTION 17. Access. All land offered for dedication for
Page 6
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
2
local park or recreational purposes shall have access to at least
one existing or proposed public street. This requirement may be
waived by the Planning Commission if the Planning Commission
determines that public street access is unnecessary for maintenance
of the park area or use thereof by residents.
SECTION 18. Sale of Dedicated Land. if during the ensuing
3 time between dedication of land for park purposes and commencement
of first-stage development, circumstances arise which indicate that
4 another site would be more suitable for local park or recreational
purposes serving the subdivision and the neighborhood (such as
5 receipt of a gift of additional park land or a change in school
location), the land may be sold upon the approval of the City
Council with the resultant funds being used for the purchase of a
more suitable site.
7
SECTION 19. Conflict. Ordinance No. 596 and/or parts of any
8 other ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
9
SECTION 20. Effect of Ordinance. If any section, sub-
section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is, for any
10 reason, held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions
of this ordinance. City Council declares that it would have passed
this ordinance and each section, sub-section, sentence, clause or
12 phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more of
the section, sub-section, sentence, clause or phrase be declared
13 unconstitutional or otherwise invalid.
14
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the said City Council on
the day of , 1991.
15
MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
16 Council on the day of , 1991 by the following vote:
17
AYES:
18 NOES:
19
ABSENT:
20 ATTEST:
21
22
Mayor
23
24
Deputy City Clerk
25
CERTIFICATE
26
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
27 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
28
I, Nancy Randolph, Deputy City Clerk of the City of San
Jacinto, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of
Ordinance No. 932 duly adopted by the City Council of the City of
San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of
1991.
31
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto
32 this day of 1991.
6
29
30
Page 7
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: April 16, 1991
SUBJ: Planning Department Filing Fees
As a result of a need to increase Staff as well as the realization
of the City's fiscal situation, Staff has reviewed the fees
collected by the Planning Department.
Philosophically, Staff Feels the Planning Department, as one of the
few departments that can be self-supporting, should be so.
Therefore, we have done a three year budget projection including
staffing levels to handle the work load carried by the department.
This staff includes a Senior Planner, and an Economic Development
Coordinator.
Based on these projections, Staff has developed a fee schedule
which will make the department self-supporting. This fee schedule
concept was discussed with the developers who sit on the Partners
In Progress Committee. These developers provided some valuable
insights from the private sector prospective. Staff is evaluating
this information in light of our goals, as well as fairness to the
devPlopment community.
Attached for your information, is a draft fee schedule which does
not incorporate the developer input. We are providing this for
your information but the Council should be advised that a revised
fee schedule will be provided as well as an implementation
ordinance for the May 7, 1991 City Council Meeting.
Staff recommends continuance of this item.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:lr
FILING FEES
AGRICULTURE PRESERVE DISSOLUTION/DIMINISHMENT $2000
AGRICULTURE PRESERVE - NOTICE OF NON-RENEWAL $ 75
AMENDED TRACT MAP $ 850
AMENDED SPECIFIC PLAN $ 850
ANNEXATION $1000
APPEAL $ 675
BUILDING PERMIT SURCHARGE - 1% of total permit fee.
Minimum $1.00, Maximum $50.00
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE $ 200
CHANGE OF ZONE $3000
COMPREHENSIVE SPECIFIC PLAN
CONCEPTUAL SPECIFIC PLAN
$4000/GPE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
$2600
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
$2500
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - Cost plus greater of $7500 or 25%
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
$ 500
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND CONDITION ENFORCEMENT
$250/plan
EXTENSION OF TIME OF MAPS
$ 75
FINAL PARCEL MAP
$1200
FINAL TRACT MAP
$2500
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
$2600 per element
HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT
$ 40
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
$ 200
PHASING PLANS
$ 75
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
$1450
REVISED MAP
$ 150
$ 200
$ 400
$ 550
$ 35
$ 500
$ 250
$3400
$ 35
$2450
$2000
$ 700
$2800
SITE PLANS <1000 sq ft or change in use
1000-5000 sq ft
>5000
SPECIAL LETTERS/REPORTS
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE
SURFACE MINING PERMIT
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
VARIANCE
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
*Additional professional consulting fees may be changed. City Staff
shall collect the appropriate deposits to cover the consulting costs
plus 15%.
MISCELLANEOUS
ADVANCE PLANNING FEE
ANNUAL CITY COUNCIL SUBSCRIPTION
AGENDA
MINUTES
ANNUAL PLANNING COMMISSION SUBSCRIPTION
STAFF REVIEW AGENDA
AGENDA
MINUTES
ANNEXATION TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
FLOOD CONTROL REVIEW
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
150/UNIT
$ 75
$ 240
$ 25
$ 45
$ 120
COST PLUS 15%
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: April 12, 1991
SUBJ: NORTH MOUNTAIN PROPOSALS
1. General Plan Amendment 1-91 and Change of Zone 2-91
2. Surface Mining
At the March 18, 1991 regular meeting of the City Council, staff was asked to fine tune
the environmental review in order for you to consider a Negative Declaration with
mitigating measures. This information is provided for your review as is the previous staff
report.
After reviewing the environmental information, there appears to be two options for the
City Council.
This option would be consider fast tracking the project by approving General Plan
Amendment 1-91 and Change of Zone 2-91 and adopting a Negative
Declaration as provided herein.
2. Option 2 would be to postpone action on General Plan Amendment 1-91 and
Change of Zone 2-91 until the Environmental Impact Report for the specific plan
is prepared and provided for your review.
As to the second matter, discussion of the status of the surface mine was also made at
the March 18, 1991 City Council meeting. It has been determined by staff that the slope
of the mountain where the surface mining operation is occurring exceeds 100 feet in
vertical rise. It will therefore be necessary to bench the mountain for slope stability°.
There are now two basic ways in which the surface mining operation can be brought into
compliance.
The new conditional use permit, which calls for the expansion of the surface
mining permit to the east and also conforms to the recommendations of Morgan's
geologist in terms of benching and the elimination of the dangerous vertical slope,
can be allowed to proceed. The application was filed on January 9, 1991. If this
new conditional use permit is granted, the grading work will be completed as soon
as possible; the reseeding will be finished; and, security will be posted.
2. The City can determine that the lack of benching and the existence of the vertical
slope are safety problems and order Mr. Morgan to immediately correct the safety
problem; reseed the new slope; and, provide security for the viability of the
planting.
Respectfully Submitted,
/92/2.15 -
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
March 18, 1991
NORTH MOUNTAIN PROPOSALS
1. General Plan Amendment 1-91 and Change of Zone 2-91
2. Surface Mining
The Council held a public hearing on a proposed amendment to the general plan and
a concurrent preannexation zoning designation, for the portion of North Mountain not
currently within the City. As you recall, two opinions were expressed to you as to
how the California Environmental Quality Act should apply in this case.
Additionally, information was requested by the Council regarding the state of
noncompliance of the existing surface mining as well as an action plan to gain
compliance.
The purpose of this memo is to clarify these specific points for the Council. Prior to
doing this, however, it is important for staff to provide background information in
order to assist the Council in making their decision.
THE ANNEXATION PROCESS
In order for North Mountain to become part of the City, an extended process must
be completed. Prior to submitting the annexation application, the following must take
place:
Council adopts a Resolution of Intention to Annex
2. Preannexation zoning and general planning must be completed. In this case,
interim general plan and zoning designations are proposed only for the purpose
of filing the annexation application.
3. An Environmental Assessment on the annexation must be completed.
4. A plat map and legal description must be prepared.
5. A Fiscal Impact Analysis must be prepared measuring the impacts of the
annexation on the County and the City.
6. A plan showing how City services will be provided to the Annexation in the
area.
Assuming that an DR is not necessary, the steps listed above will allow an
application to be submitted to LAFCO by approximately June 1, 1991. LAFCO can
process the application in approximately five months. It takes the City approximately
three months to complete the annexation or no sooner than February 1, 1992.
THE SPECIFIC PLAN AND EIR PROCESS
The "Soboba Summit" Specific Plan has been determined to need an Environmental
Impact Report. The draft EIR will be prepared and processed concurrently with
proposed development. The Specific Plan itself must include General Plan
Amendment And Changes of Zone in order to implement the plan in accordance with
our regulations.
The steps to an EIR are:
Notice of Preparation - this notifies the various regulatory agencies that an EIR is
being prepared and asking for their input as to what environmental issues need to be
discussed.
Data gathering and the preparation of a Draft Elk.
Circulation of the Draft EIR for regulatory review and public comment.
Preparation of the Final EIR and final review of the Specific plan. At this time, the
ultimate general plan and zoning will be assigned to North Mountain.
The fastest time that a project can be processed with an EIR is approximately eight
months.
FAST TRACK VS REGULAR TRACK
It is typical for a city to have a "Fast Track" process for those projects it finds to be
beneficial to the city. Fast tracking involves giving special priority to a project which
may mean special staff meetings, special Planning Commission and/or Council
meetings, and consideration of assuming risks, which, in most cases are low.
In order to fast track the "Soboba Summit" Specific Plan, it is necessary to begin the
annexation process prior to the ultimate land uses being assigned. As you can see
from the information above, by processing the annexation and specific plan/EIR
concurrently, the annexation and the development review/EIR process can be
complete in early 1992.
If an EIR is required to assign zoning, the soonest an annexation application can be
filed is early 1992, and the annexation could not be finished any sooner than late
1992.
THE CEQA QUESTION
The Staff recommendation to you at the last meeting was the adoption of a negative
declaration on the general plan and zone change. The City Attorney indicated an
EIR was necessary based on his review of CEQA. We have checked with two
attorneys that specialize in the environmental law and both of them stated that an
EIR is the most correct way to proceed. However, both attorneys also indicated that
a negative declaration may be possible, provided an adequate job was done in
identifying all foreseeable environmental concerns within that negative declaration and
provide mitigation.
In reviewing the existing environmental documentation we do not feel all
environmental concerns have been identified at this time.
RISK
Staff conferred with the City Attorney as to what risk the City and developer might
incur should someone challenge the legality of a negative declaration. The City
attorney advised that a properly filed challenge could result in a court order setting
aside the negative declaration and ordering that an EIR be prepared. The court can
also award attorney's fees.
The Environmental Impact Report Process has already begun. The mandatory 45 day
Notice of Preparation period is already passed. The staff is compiling the comments
from the regulatory agencies and will soon be ordering the preparation of the draft
EIR. If a judge ordered the preparation of an EIR, the process would already have
been started.
As to the issue of attorney's fees, Mr. Morgan has verbally indicated he would
indemnify the City against the attorney's fees.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The decision the Council has to make is whether it desires to fast track the project.
If it does, then it will be assuming the risk stated above. However, staff is not
comfortable at this time with the Council closing the hearing and granting a Negative
Declaration on March 19, 1991. If the Council desires to grant a Negative
Declaration staff recommends the public hearing be continued open until the meeting
of April 16, 1991 and to allow staff to prepare a comprehensive Negative Declaration
with mitigating measures.
If the Council does not desire to fast track the project, it should simply table these
items until such time as an Environmental Impact Report has been completed.
SURFACE MINE STATUS
The surface mining permit along Soboba Road is in noncompliance with the
Conditions of Approval as follows:
1. The grading of the hillside, where mining has been completed, is not in
confol mance with the Unifoun Building Code. In order to comply with the
Building Code, a bench would have to be cut at every 30 ft. of rise in vertical
elevation or a geologist must perform a slope stability study to the satisfaction
of the City's_ Geologist, in order to avoid the requirement to provide the
benching.
The top of the slope, in its current condition, is at the upper limit of the
approved surface mining permit. In order to properly bench the slope, the
bounds of excavation much be increased.
Mr. Morgan's geologist has submitted a slope stability report that is satisfactory
to the City's geologist. This report indicates the slope is stable without
benching. However, in the opinion of Morgan's geologist the most appropriate
way to grade the hillside would be to develop the slope to a point further back
into the hillside, with benching, for the purpose of eliminating a dangerous
vertical slope that was created illegally by the former owner in the early 1980's,
prior to annexation to the City.
2. The finished hillside has not been hydroseeded for erosion control. Mr.
Morgan has not performed this task because he was awaiting a resolution to
Item No. 1, above.
3. Morgan has not provided security guaranteeing the reclamation (reseeding) of
the slopes. Again, he was awaiting the resolution of Item No. 1 to determine
the final cost of reclamation. Also, he has experienced the "catch 22" problem
of the fact that he could not secure a bond because he was not the operator of
the surface mining permit and Fontana Paving, the operator, could not secure a
bond because they were not the property owner. Apparently, this issue has
recently resolved itself.
COMPLIANCE OPTIONS
There are three basic ways in which the surface mining operation can be brought into
compliance.
1. The existing slope can be hydroseeded, and Morgan can post a reclamation
bond to guarantee the survival of the hydroseed for 12 months.
2. The new conditional use permit, which calls for the expansion of the surface
mining permit to the east and also conforms to the recommendation of
Morgan's geologist in terms of benching and the elimination of the dangerous
vertical slope, can be allowed to proceed. This application was filed on
January 9, 1991. If this new conditional use permit is granted, the grading
work will be completed as soon as possible; the reseeding will be finished;
and, security will be posted.
3. The City can determine the lack of benching and the existence of the vertical
slope are merely an elimination of a safety problem and order Morgan to
immediately correct the safety problem; reseed the new slope; and, provide
security for the viability of the planting.
Roger Morgan will comply with the desires of the City Council.
Respectfully submitted,
17 2 741.1
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKNI:lr
S A N T 0
ENvIROiEmL CHECKLIST FORM
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: INTERMAC, INC
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: P. O. BOX 946, CORONA, CA.
92118 (619)575-2986
3. Date of Checklist Submittal:MARCH 25, 1991
4. Agency Requiring Checklist:CITY OF SAN JACINTO
5. Name of Proposal, if applicable:
CHANGE OF ZONE 2-91, GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT 1-91, AND ANNEXATION 69
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on
attached sheets.) YES MAYBE NO
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures.
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soils.
c. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features.
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or physical features.
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soils, either on or off site.
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or
erosion which may modify the channel of a river
or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay,
inlet or lake.
g
Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,
mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards.
X
X
X
X
YES MAYBE NO
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality.
b. The creation of objectionable odors.
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or
temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally.
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
water.
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or
the rate and amount of surface runoff.
c. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
flood waters.
d. Change in the amount of surface water in any
water body.
e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity.
•nnnnnnnn
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground water.
g. Change in the quantity or ground waters, either
through direct additions of withdrawals, or
through the interception of an aquifer by cut
or excavations.
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public water supplies.
i. Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding or tidal waves.
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of
any species of plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, and aquatic plants).
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of plants.
x
x i
x
X
X
X
x
X
x
x
x
YES MAYBE NO
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or is a barrier to the normal replenishment
of existing species.
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop.
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or number
of any species of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms or insects).
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of animals.
c. Introduction of new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration or
movement of animals.
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat.
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels.
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels. X
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light
and glare. X
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial
alteration of the present or planned land use of an
area.
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resource. X
b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural
resource.
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous
substances (including, but not limited to oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions.
X
X
X
YES MAYBE NO
b. Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or -an emergency evacuation plan.
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density or growth rate of the human
population of an area.
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing.
13. Transportation / Circulation. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement.
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand
for new parking.
c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation
system.
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people or goods.
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic.
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians.
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection.
b. Police protection.
c. Schools
d. Parks or other recreational facilities.
e. Storm water drainage.
f. Other governmental services.
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy.
b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy.
X
X
X
X
YES MAYBE NO
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or 'Ilbstantial alterations to the following
utilities:
a. Electricity or gas.
b. Communications systems.
c. Water.
d. Sewer or septic tank.
e. Storm water drainage.
f. Solid waste and disposal.
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health (excluding mental health).
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards. X
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction
of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or
will the proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to public view.
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
opportunities.
90. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. Alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archeological site.
b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or
aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building structure or object.
c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a
physical change which would affect unique ethnic
cultural values.
d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or
sacred uses within the potential impact area.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
YES MAYBE NO
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory. X
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental goals.
(A short term impact on the environment is one which occurs
in a relatively brief, definite period of time while long
term impacts will endure well into the future. X
c. Does the project have impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable. (A project may
impact on two or more separate resources where the impact
on each resource is relatively small, but where the
effect of the total of those impacts on the environment
is significant.)
X
d. Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly. X
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
IV. DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
X I find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, there will not be a
significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures
described on an attached sheet have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
Date
April 10, 1991
Signature
For City of San Jacinto
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Untable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures.
The change of zone, general plan amendment, and annexation
will not have a direct or significant impact on the site.
However, the subsequent use of the land, because of the
change of zone, general plan amendment, and annexation may
cause changes in the geologic substructure of the site due
to excavations and grading.
A published report indicates the entire base of the mountain
of the subject site is a landslide area.
Development within landslide areas shall require further
study to evaluate landslide characteristics in order to
provide design recommendations.
A proposed development created by the change of zone and
general plan amendment will be required to furnish a
geotechincal report prior to final approval of the
development project.
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soils.
The change of zone and the general plan amendment will not
have a significant impact on the site. However, the
subsequent use of the land, because of the change of zone
and general plan amendment, may cause compaction and
overcovering of the soils on the site due to excavations and
grading-
A proposed development created by the change of zone and
general plan amendment will be required to furnish
geothecnical report prior to final approval of the
development project. Approved grading practices may also
lessen the impact a development has on the site.
c. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features.
The change of zone and general plan amendment approval will
not have a direct impact on the land. Any subsequent
development may have a significant impact. An EIR will be
required prior to the approval of any significant
development.
Changes in the topography or ground surface relief features
North Mt. Environmental Discussion Page 1
shall only be made following the recommendations of the
geothecnical report and using approved grading techniques.
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soils, either on or off site.
The proposed W-2 zoning and the Specific Plan general plan
designation will not have a significant impact. However,
increase run off will result when development is allowed
because of the change of zone and general plan amendment.
Water erosion of soils may be mitigated by proper grading
techniques and erosion control landscaping. Identified
debris flow areas shall have channelized stream outflows and
have flood barriers in place. A hydrology study shall be
made prior to final approval of any development project on
site. All of the aforementioned mitigation will be required
to be discussed in the EIR.
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may
modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of
the ocean, or any bay, inlet or lake.
Run off water from the mountain drains into the San Jacinto
River and there may be some impact if development occurs.
However, it is not known how the drainage water is going to
be dealt with and therefore the impacts are not known at
this time.
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,
mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards.
The southerly portion at the base of the mountain is known
to be within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone where
the San Jacinto Fault parallels Soboba Road.
There is evidence of several landslides, debris flows, and
colluvium deposits of varying ages spotted along the base of
the mountain.
A detailed soil and geologic investigation shall be
performed prior to the finalization of development plans for
the property.
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
North Mt. Environmental Discussion Page 2
2-a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality.
Long term air quality impacts will be generated by vehicular
activity and energy consumption. Although these are a
fraction of regional emissions, the proposed project will
have an incremental adverse impact on the ambient air
quality.
Mitigation measures could be to limit vehicular access to
the mountain top and the restricted use of carbon fueled
vehicles at the top of the mountain.
3. Water. Will the proposal result in:
3-b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or
the rate and amount of surface runoff.
Changes in water absorption, drainage patterns, and the rate
and amount of run off water would change with the
development of the site.
Flood control devices such as retention basins, and brow and
terrace ditches, along with other acceptable measures may
mitigate the impact to acceptable levels.
Water erosion of soils may be mitigated by proper grading
techniques and erosion control landscaping. Identified
debris flow areas shall have channelized stream outflows and
have flood barriers in place. A hydrology study shall be
made prior to final approval of any development project on
site.
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels.
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels.
The change of zone and general plan amendment will not cause
significant noise impact.
The development that would be proposed on the site will have
both a short term acoustic impact due to construction
activities and a long term acoustic impact due to vehicular
traffic on and off site.
Mitigation for the short term may be accomplished by
limiting construction working hours near residential areas
and have all construction equipment be furnished with proper
North Mt. Environmental Discussion Page 3
operating and maintained mufflers. Stationary equipment
should be placed so that the emitted noise is directed away
from occupied buildings.
For the long term, vehicular traffic could be limited at the
top of the mountain and access up the mountain could be
restricted to service vehicles only.
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light
and glare.
Lights from the development at the top of the mountain and,
if the access route is up the face of the mountain, lights
from vehicles and street lights along the access route may
interfere with the environmental setting of the mountain.
Buildings at the top of the mountain may be designed to
limit the light and glare seen from the valley floor by
using designed setbacks, hooded lamps and low intensity
exterior lights.
If the access to the top of the mountain is up the face of
the mountain, street lights may be hooded and/or of low
intensity and/or a low profile type standard.
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial
alteration of the present or planned land use of an
area.
Currently the subject land is used by para gliders and
hangliders as a jump off point. The planned use will
incorporate the para and hand glider use with other
recreational activities.
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources.
Any development will use some natural resources. The
development as a result of this proposal will not
significantly impact natural resources, but cumulatively it
may.
North Mt. Environmental Discussion Page 4
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
b. Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or an emergency evacuation plan.
The top of the mountain will be difficult for emergency
response and evacuation because of the limited access.
Emergency services, such as police and fire, would have a
manned station on the top of the mountain. Helicopter and
four wheel drive vehicles may be use to transport evacuees
off the top.
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density or growth rate of the human
population of an area.
The site is currently uninhabited, therefore, any action
that allows any type of residential development will
increase the human population of an area.
13. Transportation / Circulation. Will the proposal
result in:
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people or goods.
Once development is allowed because of this action, goods
and people will travel to and from the top of the mountain.
A traffic study may be needed to ensure the access route to
the top will be sufficient to manage the movement of people
and goods.
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians.
Any development of an undeveloped area may bring traffic
hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians.
Traffic control signs may be strategically placed to assure
safety for the bicyclist, pedestrians and motor vehicles.
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection.
Development allowed by the annexation, change of zone and
general plan amendment would result in a negative impact on
North Mt. Environmental Discussion Page 5
the City Fire Department's capability to provide fire
protection. Currently the City Fire Department is neither
capable -of fighting a hillside fire nor have the ability to
move effectively up the mountain to combat a fire.
Response time is difficult to estimate as improved roads
access to the upper portion of the site is basically non-
existent. The California Forestry and Fire Protection
currently maintains certain truck trails in the vicinity,
but it does not have the authority to authorize others to
traverse there. Travel time to the upper site via the
existing truck trails would exceed 45 minutes. A major wild
land fire would required additional staff which would
severely reduce the fire protection in San Jacinto.
Water is non-existent at this time at the upper site of the
project. The lower site would p,6 fair better, however,
water is not currently sufficient to handle a major wild
fire.
The risk of fire in and around the subject site will
increase dramatically with the influx of residents and
guests. This will also impact --th any residences further to
the east (Poppet Flats, Pine Cove, and the Soboba Indian
Reservation).
Safe evacuation of the resort residents and guests would be
very difficult should a major fire occur.
A new on site fire station with a minimum staff of three, a
helicopter and heliport for emergency situations, a
bulldozer, and fees for airplane fire retardant drops would
substantially mitigate the need for fire equipment needed to
fight a hillside and mountain top fire.
A new separate agreement would be required with the
California Division of Forestry in order to provide
additional fire protection service.
Proposed buildings would have fire sprinkler systems
installed. The use of non combustible materials shall be
required on all building exteriors. Landscape buffers shall
be created to reduce fire hazards. Scheduled mandatory fire -
inspections shall be made. Designated fire lanes and roads
shall be approved by the fire department and maintained to
an acceptable level. A water storage reservoir shall be
construc1Vat the top of the mountain.
Should the project becomes significantly delayed or is
suspended, the applicant and/or owner shall immediately
start deannexation proceedings.
North Mt. Environmental Discussion Page 6
b. Police protection.
If no development occurs there would not be a significant
impact on police services.
The proposed annexation, change of zone, and general plan
amendment would impact available police services when
development is allowed because of the changes.
The Police Department does not have adequate facilities and
manpower in order to provide existing level of service to
the project site. Decentralization of police service would
result in additional supervisory staff.
Immediate emergency access to the top of the mountain would
pose a problem for the Police Department. Access to the top
of the mountain via the access road on the face of the
mountain may not be adequate for immediate emergency
responses. Other emergency routes would require longer
response time.
A new substation fully manned shall be constructed on or
near the proposed development. Two four wheel all terrain
vehicle shall be based at the new substation as an emergency
vehicle.
c. Schools
There may be some impact on schools because any development
allowed by this project would bring people into the area,
whether, they move or come to work in a development.
**** School mitigation fees are currently collected by the school
district, however, collectively the amount may not be
sufficient to build and staff a school.*******************
d. Parks or other recreational facilities.
Any increase in population will cumulatively increase the
use or need of a recreational parks and facilities.
Sufficient parks fees should be equitably collected to
provide future park sites and facilities.
e. Storm water drainage.
The top of the mountain will not be subjected to storm water
drainage problems. The lower portion of the subject site
along Soboba Road is traversed by several drainage courses
and would be most vulnerable to flood damage from storm
North Mt. Environmental Discussion Page 7
water run off.
The resulting development because of the change of zone and
general plan amendment would have both a negative and
positive impacts on drainage and flooding. Increases in run
off will occur due to the construction of roadways, paved
surfaces, buildings, and modification of existing
topography. The creation of impervious surfaces prevents
runoff from percolating into the ground water, however, this
impact is lessened when considering that a majority of the
site consists of very steep and rocky terrain.
Any development because of this proposal will alter natural
runoff patterns and replace them with urban development and
man-made drainage systems to control runoff.
Run off water from the mountain side would need to be
collected and released under Soboba Road and eventually
deposited into the San Jacinto River. Any required drainage
easements will need to be obtained prior to approval of any
development.
Positive impacts would be a decrease in soil erosion and
concurrent containment of uncontrolled runoff.
A grading plan showing protection measures to prevent
siltation and erosion, i.e., drainage channels to control
run off and settling ponds or sediment basins to slow water
and allow silt to settle out , should be submitted for
review and approval.
Grading operations should be conducted during dry months and
revegetation should occur immediately upon completion to
prevent erosion.
Storm water retention basins should be designed and
constructed to control erosion and runoff. A hydrology
study shall be made to determine location and size of the
basins.
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy.
Although the change of zone and general plan amendment will
not affect energy use, any proposed development within the
subject site would consume electricity and/or gas.
Buildings within development projects would be subject to
Title 24 energy guidelines of the California Administrative
Code.
North Mt. Environmental Discussion Page 8
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
a. Electricity or natural gas.
New electrical and gas service mains will be required if
development takes place at the top of the mountain.
Mainlines would either have to be routed directly up the
slopes from the valley floor or from Beaumont, Banning or
sources westerly along State Highway 79.
If exposed electrical lines are directed up the slope from
the valley, the visual impact could be significant. Gas
lines are usually underground but may be exposed if access
is limited.
Construction techniques should be used to reduce the high
visibility of the electrical power lines up the mountain
slope.
Exposed gas lines should be of a color that matches the
surrounding terrain.
Service to the lower site would not create a significant
impact.
b. Communications systems.-
Communication lines could cause a visibility impact if it is
routed up the mountain slope.
If a microwave communication system is use there would be no
visible impact or the need for additional lines.
Mainlines could come from Beaumont-Banning area or from
existing lines along State highway 79 to the west.
No impact would occur at the lower site.
c. Water.
New main water lines will be needed for any development
allowed by this proposal.
New wells will be needed to serve the project at the top and
lower site of the mountain.
d. Sewer or septic tank.
A sewer system would be required if any substantially
proposed development allowed by this proposal is considered.
North Mt. Environmental Discussion Page 9
The lower portion of the site would require a sewer lift
station -at the south west area of the subject site to route
the liquid waste under the San Jacinto River and to an
approved gravity flowing sewer system.
At the upper portion of the site, the possibility of a sewer
line down the face of the mountain may be out of the
question, as this could pose difficult hydraulic problems
and, should it become plugged, create tremendous pressure.
An on site sewer system should be considered for the top of
the mountain site.
Reclaimed water could be used for landscaping. There is
also a possibility to use reclaimed water to replenish man
made lakes and ponds throughout the development. However,
primary or secondary treated reclaimed water may pose a
problem if there are heavy rains that may cause the lakes
and ponds to overflow and eventually drain into the San
Jacinto River.
The sewer system should be constructed to treat the liquid
waste until it is acceptable for it to enter into a river
system.
e. Storm water drainage.
SEE ITEM 14-e
f. Solid waste and disposal.
Although the development at the top of the mountain that
could be allowed by this proposal will not immediately
impact existing solid waste land fills, the transporting of
the solid waste off the mountain may be a problem if there
are no suitable access roads.
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards.
Development at the southwest corner at the base of the
mountain is within a known "A" Flood Zone. Prior to any
development, a flood permit will be required.
Development allowed on the upper site by this proposal would
expose people to wild land fires. (See 14, a)
North Mt. Environmental Discussion Page 10
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction
of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or
will the proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to public view.
This proposal will not directly result in an adverse impact
on the aesthetics of the area. However, the development
that would be allowed, may, if the only access road to the
top of the mountain is via the south face of the mountain
may have a visibility impact from the valley.
If the road is constructed up the face of the mountain,
heavy landscaping along the road up the mountain may
alleviate majority of the impact the road would create. The
landscape will need to be maintained throughout the year and
especially during the hot summer, because of the south
facing slope of the mountain is usually hotter than other
areas.
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance
This project or proposal will not have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory.
The change of zone, general plan amendment and annexation
will not achieve short term, to the disadvantage of long
term, environmental goals.
The change of zone, general plan amendment and annexation
does not impacts which are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable.
The change of zone, general plan amendment and annexation
does not have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly
or indirectly.
North Mt. Environmental Discussion Page 11
II
a, iv2. accinto
City Hall 201 East Main Street
Post Office Box 488
714 - 654-7337
San Jacinto, California 92383
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
PROJECT: General Plan Amendment 1-91, Change of Zone 2-91 and
Annexation #69
LOCATION: approximately 1,116 acres located in the San Jacinto Mountains
north of Soboba Road, occupying Sections 13 and 14 and
portions of Sections 16 and 23.
PROPONENT: Roger Morgan
FINDING: This project will have no significant effect on the environment as
mitigating measures have been provided.
MITIGATION MEASURES: areas within the "A" floodzone shall comply with the
City's Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance and obtain a permit to develop in a
floodzone, a Kangaroo Rat study shall be conducted and a report submitted to the
City, a seismic study shall be conducted for areas within the Alquist Priolo special
study zone, provision of utilities service shall be made prior to any future
development, mitigate cost and impacts of public safety structure and service through
the payment of fees and provision of necessary infrastructure as required by the City
of San Jacinto Police and Fire Departments, provide adequate circulation to the site
for ingress and egress as well as emergency purposes, pay all school fees and
NEGAIWE DECLARATION PAGE 2 GPA 1-91, CZ 2-91, ANNEX 69
participate in a school financing district as determined by the City Council, mitigate
impacts on public facilities through the payment of development fees and participate
in public facilities financing district as determined by the City Council, Prior to the
development of the property an Environmental Impact Report must be completed and
approved addressing future Specific Plan proposals, zoning and development of the
site. Prior to subsequent use of land, landslide areas shall be identified and design
recommendations completed. A geotechnical report shall be provided prior to final
approval of any development. A hydrology study shall be made prior to final approval
of any development on the site. Participate in mitigation of fire potential as
determined by the City. Should the project become significantly delayed, the
applicant and/or owner shall immediately begin deannexation proceedings. Participate
in mitigation of police protection as determined by the City.
By: DATE: April 1, 1991
BRIAN MC NABB
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 1362
April 5, 1991
Dear Ms. Easter:
AN,IS CLUB _c).F . HEpET
hn E. gUehfing, Secreta
7385 Meridian Street
Hemet, CA 92344
Phone: 925-5683
Tre riwAms CLUB
Chartered in 1922
Pam Easter, City Manager
201 E. Main Street
San Jacinto, CA 92383
The Kiwanis Club of Hemet is sponsoring the Carson & Barnes Circus
on May 9, 1991, to raise funds for our Anti-Drug Education program
of Valley school children and to support programs for the handi-
capped. We have permission from the owner to set up the circus
on the property immediately West of the Valley Wide Recreation on
West Esplanade Avenue. There are two performances planned, at
4:30 and 8:00 p.m. on MaY 9th only.
Information as requested was supplied to Kenson Nishino in your
office today except the Cerfificate of Compliance/Application for
Permit which we have asked Carson & Barnes to complete and Express
it directly to your office.
As a matter of information, I have attached copies of ten letters
from other organizations, nine in California, that have sponsored
the circus. I also contacted several in our immediate area of
Southern California and received excellent reports from all con-
cerning the circus operation.
As a non -profit community service organization, we wish to request
permission from the City of San Jacinto to sponsor and present the
Carson & Barnes circus to the entire valley community as outlined
above. So that we may maximize the support of our program, we also
request that all fees be waived, if possible. We will, if requi-red,
attend the next San Jacinto City Council meeting to provide addition-
al information and answer questions.
We will appreciate your assistance in this effort.
Sincerely yours,
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
Henry T. Garcia, Assistant City Manager
April 12, 1991
City Participation in the Ramona Days/Cinco de Mayo
Parade
As you recall, Councilwoman Jan Leahy suggested that the City
consider participating in the Ramona Days/Cinco de Mayo Parade.
This item was referred for additional follow-up by Councilwoman
Leahy and Staff. For the Council's information, the Ramona Days
Parade is scheduled for April 26, 1991. The Cinco de Mayo Parade
is scheduled for May 5, 1991.
After several follow-up conversations with Councilwoman Leahy, it
is recommended that the City use a convertible vehicle to transport
councilmembers during the parades. Prior to participation, the
Council will need to determine the following:
1. Does the Council wish to participate in one, or both, parades?
2. The Council will need to decide which councilmembers will
participate.
The Council should be aware of the fact that City Staff will
provide the vehicle for either/both parade(s).
It is our hope that by actually participating in our Valley's
special events, the City of San Jacinto will be viewed as a
proactive and progressive City, concerned with its interaction with
the Community.
nr
Parae Easter
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Honorable Mayoand Members of the City Council
April 8, 1991
Exploration of Joint Public Safety Facilities
with the City of Hemet
Police Chief Joe Kozma, Fire Chief Ross Chadwick and I have been
meeting with members of Hemet's staff to explore the
possibility/feasibility of joint public safety facilities. Areas
that have been very preliminarily explored are joint dispatch,
joint holding facilities, etc. currently as well as in the future.
As Chief Kozma states in his attached memorandum, there are
potential cost savings that could be achieved in sharing such a
facility.
Before we go any further in our discussions with the City of Hemet,
we wanted to take this opportunity to ask for your endorsement of
this effort and authorization to proceed with such a preliminary
feasibility study. Hemet City Manager, Joe Guzzetta, is also
planning to bring this item to the Hemet City Council this month.
As Chief Kozma indicates, there would be no anticipated cost or
consultant services required at this point of the discussion. We
would work to determine what space needs we each have and what
potential cost savings might be realized by joint shared
facilities. (Preliminary San Jacinto police facility space needs
were developed as part of Warnecke's space needs program)
If authorized, Staff would provide you with periodic reports to
keep you updated on the meetings. Any request for the use of the
consultants would be brought back to the Council for consideration.
However, in this initial exploratory phase, our two staffs would
be doing the necessary "leg work".
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council authorize
City staff to study the possibility/feasibility of joint facilities
with the City of Hemet.
cc: Chief Kozma
Chief Chadwick
Attachment
San Jacinto Police Department
160 West 6th Street
San Jacinto, CA. 92383
MEMORANDUM
To:
From:
Date:
Honorable Mayor and Council Members via City Manager
Chief of Police C
April 1, 1991 0
Subject: Exploration of Joint -Facilities With the City of Hemet
The City of San Jacinto has discussed for quite some time the
possibility of going into a joint venture for combined facilities
with the City of Hemet as related to Police and Fire.
The future outlook on public safety services as impacted by
growth and available revenue is not good. As the Chief of Police,
I feel we must look at all alternatives to reduce the cost of
providing essential public safety services, up to and including
combining services where possible. One aspect is to move forward
with a study to determine the feasibility of a joint public safety
facility which may include a joint jail facility, communication
facility, storage facility, training facility (to include fire
training), and may further be looked at by jointly combining fuel
storage, vehicle maintenance and etc. The actual police
departments for both agencies could be located on the same site or
may be located elsewhere as may be determined by the study.
However the duplicate essential facilities need to be studied for
feasibility whereby the tax payer would receive more for their tax
dollar in both cities as a result of building one large public
safety complex versus two smaller ones.
We are a City of progress and as such must view the future
with an open mind and sound strategic planning. I strongly urge
the Council to authorize your City Staff to begin review of the
possibility of joint facilities with the Staff of the City of
Hemet. At this time no cost is anticipated with the exception of
staff meeting times and staff preliminary research time.
and Council Members
P m . Easter, City Manager
April 12, 1991
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: 2010 Program
At one of your recent Council meetings, the Council determined
that they would like to reactivate the 2010 effort. You asked
me to contact Clayton Record as to his willingness to serve as
Chairman and to come back with a recommended process.
Clayton agreed to serve as Chair and has developed, in cooperation
with our Staff, a suggested process, timeline, and executive
committee composition.
Recommendation:
The attached 2010 program be endorsed and that Chairman Record
select an executive committee, whose composition will be endorsed
by the Mayor.
nr
CC: Brian McNabb
Clayton Record
Jerry Davenport
FROM: Clayton Record
DATE: April 5, 1991
.E.4 5 We Flofida Avenue 714 558-7116 fel
Box 851
71 4 652-8804 FP
-elet.Collform
343-3814
MEMORANDUM
TO: Francis Boykin, Mayor
Pap-Easter, City Manager
„Brian McNabb, Director of Planning and Community
Dev,91Dpment
Jerry Davenport/ConSultant
SUBJECT: 2010 PROGRAM
For your information and consideration, the following are my
thoughts regarding how we should proceed with your 2010 program.
Continue to use the knowledge, skills and efforts of the
60± members of the 2010 Committee. Their interest and
participation can be the foundation of the exercise.
Through them we can identify community issues of interest
and prioritize them as to importance. Following an initial
issue identification meeting they could come together on a
quarterly basis for updates on progress.
Appoint an executive committee who would be selected on the
basis of area of interest representation such as:
Economic Development
Environmental
Agricultural
Business
Education
Development - Building Industry
Citizens-at-Large
This group would be selected and appointed by the Council.
They would be representative of the 60± members of the 2010
Committee and other knowledgeable community members.
A city staff person would have the responsibility of
providing necessary staffing of the 2010 program activi-
ties. Doing the necessary paperwork, meeting arrangements
and development of focused white papers for executive
committee deliberation and determination. Constant
19 91
MEMORANDUM
2010 PrograM
April 5, 1991
Page 2
communication with city manager and planning director would
occur.
Subcommittees would be used as necessary on ad-hoc issues
to supplement and enhance specific issue discussions.
Participants would come from the executive committee, 2010
committee or the community as appropriate.
The chairman of the 2010 committee and the executive
committee would be responsible for facilitating the
disci:ssions of the group but would not use the position to
direct or dominate any discussion.
Meetings would be held from 6 PM to 9 PM to avoid workday
conflicts.
Probably a minimum of 8 months would be necessary to
deliver to the council a package of policy recommendations.
The task of the 2010 committee would then be considered
complete.
Appropriate hearings would then be scheduled by the
planning conunission for further review of the recommen-
dations and ultimate final recommendation to the city
council.
The council would then hold final hearings, providing and
accepting the ultimate responsibility tot policy adoption
and direction.
With your concurrence we will move forward with the selection of
executive committee appointments.
CAR:bsv
MEMORANDUM
TO:
DATE:
Ci€17 Council Members
Jan Leahy
April 11, 1991
SUBJECT: Policy for San Jacinto City Council Certificates of
Appreciation - DRAFT
For the purpose of promoting and encouraging pride within the City
of San Jacinto, and to demonstrate the City's appreciation to those
individuals, organizations and/or groups that demonstrate their
willingness to make a positive difference in the City of San
Jacinto, a Certificate of Appreciation is established.
This Certificate will be presented to those whom any of the Council
members may feel deserving. The Council member must present to the
entire Council, the name of those to be honored and the reason for
giving the Certificate. If there is a consensus from the Council,
the Certificate will be presented. If any of the Council members
has serious objections about the presentation, the Certificate will
not be presented.
To facilitate this process, the Council member who initiates the
award gives the name and reason for the award to the City Clerk so
that the Certificate can be completed. The Mayor, or designee,
will sign all certificates to be presented. It will be at the
discretion of the Mayor who will present the award to the
recipient.
To further promote this positive type of activity and to help our
City's image, it is suggested that tbP. local newspapers be
encouraged to cover the presentation.
March 28, 1991
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
San Jacinto Fire Department
MEMO
AG
Pamela S. Easter, City Manage
Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief
Weed Abatement Hearing Continuation to April 16
1991
The hearing to voice conceins on the weed abatement program (Resolution No.
1940) needs to be continued from the City Council meeting of April 2, 1991 to
the April 16, 1991 City Council meeting. This is due to the fact the Fire
Department has not mailed out the notices in the proper time. We have had a
problem getting the mailing labels finished. We need to mail out the notices at
least five days before the hearing. We will have plenty of time before the April
16th meeting.
.2, _1991 Weed Abatement Resolution - Resolution No: 1 950
RESOLUTION NO.1950
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND DETERMINING TO PROCEED
WITH ABATEMENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ASSEMBLED IN REGULAR
SESSION THIS 2nd DAY OF APRIL, 1991 DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
The City Council adopted Resolution No. 1940 on March 19, 1991, which by its terms the
Council elected to proceed under Government Code Sections 39501-39588 and did declare as a public
nuisance all weeds growing upon streets, sidewalks and private property in the City all rubbish, refuse and
dirt upon parkways, sidewalks and private property; and
A public hearing was held on April , 1991, and objections to the proposed removal of weeds,
rubbish, refuse and diri. were made or presented either in writing or orally;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS FOUND, DETERMINED AND ORDERED AS
FOLLOWS:
1. The foregoing is trup.
2. The City Councilfilixed April 2, 1991 at the hour of 7:30 p.m. o'clock in thc Council
Chambers, as the time and place for hearing all objections to the proposed removal of weeds, rubbish,
refuse and dirt, and the Fire Chief was designated as the person to perform the duties imposed by
Govcrrunent Code sections 39560-39588 upon the serkitendent, and he did prepare notices to destroy
and remove rubbish, refuse and dirt; the City didrrrldiritten notice of the proposed abatement to all
persons owning property described in Resolution No. 1940 in the time, form and manner prescribed by
law. E.„,,,-...-- 041.A.,-,-../ i C., fq 1 t frit ' iv „-K4fre-
rl
The City Council did hold a public hearing on Apri146',1991, and objections either written
_
or oral to the proposed removal of weeds, rubbish. p,:itisc and dirt were r.resented. and the heiinc' was
closed on April,' 6, 1991.
4. The noxious and/or dangerous weeds growing in or upon or adjacent to real property
described in Resolution No.1940 are seasonal and recurrent nuisances.
5. The Superintendent is ordered to abate the nuisance declared by Resolution No. 1940 by
havins4 the weeds, rubbish, refuse and dirt removed, and for this purpose the Superintendent may enter
upon private property to abate the nuisance, and the Superintendent is ordered to cause the abatement of
the weeds from time-to-time hereafter as the weeds recur per section 39562.1 of the Government Code.
Before the Superintendent arrives, any property owner may remove the weeds, rubbish, refuse and dirt at
his own expense.
6. The Superintendent or the contractor awarded the work, as the case may be, shall keep an
account of the cost of abatement in front of or on each separate parcel of land where the work is done and
modification and confirmation, an itemized written report showing this cost, all as more particularly
described by Government Code section 39574.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
resolution and cause it to be published pursuant to law,
I
A;:ril 2, 1991
Weed Abatement Resolution - Resolution No. 1950
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of April 1991 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Mayor
Deputy City clerk
CERTIFICATE
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. .1950 duly adopted by the said City
Council of the city of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein.
Deputy Cily clerk
COX, COX & CAMPER
A Professional Corporation
Attorneys at Law
805 East Florida Avenue
Hemet, California 92343
(714) 652-1400
FAX #: (714) 652-3990
FAX TRANSMITTAL
DATE: April 17, 1991 FAX NO: 654-3728
TO: Nancy Randolph
FROM: Jim Cox
SUBJECT MATTER: Weed Abatement Resolution, Ordering Abatement
Council Meeting of April 16, 1991
Dear Nancy, Enclosed is the re-draft of the Resolution
ordering weed abatement, pursuant to the Council's direction
at the meeting of April 16, 1991. Thanks.
TRANSMITTING PAGES, INCLUDING COVER SHEET
NOTE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FAX MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED
ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE
READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE
EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE TO DELIVER IT TO THE INTENDED
RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION,
DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR,
PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL
MESSAGE TO US AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE.
THANK YOU.
IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE TELEPHONE (714) 652-1400
AND ASK FOR PAT.
COX, COX & CAMPER
A Professional Corporation
Attorneys at Law
805 East Florida Avenue
Hemet, California 92343
(714) 652-1400
FAX #: (714) 652-3990
FAX TRANSMITTAL
DATE:
April 17, 1991
FAX NO: 654-5
TO:
Chief Chadwick
FROM: Jim Cox
SUBJECT MATTER: Weed Abatement
TRANSMITTING
PAGES, INCLUDING COVER SHEET
NOTE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FAX MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED
ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE
READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE
EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE TO DELIVER IT TO THE INTENDED
RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION,
DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR,
PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL
MESSAGE TO US AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE.
THANK YOU.
IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE TELEPHONE (714) 652-1400
AND ASK FOR PAT.
Feel free to contact me if you have questions.
C--
Jim Cox
THOMAS M. COX
JAMES A. COX
BEVERLY M. CAMPER
COX, COX 8c CAMPER
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
805 EAST FLORIDA AVENUE
HEMET, CALIFORNIA 92343
TELEPHONE
AREA CODE 714
652-1400
FAX (714) 652-3990
To: Chief Chadwick
San Jacinto Fire Department
From: Jim Cox
Re: Weed Abatement
Dear Chief:
Enclosed is a copy of the resolution ordering abatement which was
amended the public hearing of April 16, 1991.
Please note that if the City desires to use a contractor to do the
abatement work, that contractor must be selected pursuant to the
public bidding requirements of the Public Contract Code (Sections
20162 et.seq.).
Also, itemized records must be kept of the work performed and the
amounts charged on each parcel. This report of the work and charges
applicable to each parcel must be presented to the Council for
confirmation. The statute requires that the report be posted
outside the Council chambers at least three days prior to the
confirmation hearing with a notice stating the date and time the
Council will consider confirmation of the report.
After confirmation, the report can be provided to the tax collector
for assessment of the liens.
RESOLUTION NO. 1950
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO OVERRULING OBJECTIONS
AND DETERMINING TO PROCEED WITH ABATEMENT
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on March 19, 1991, the City Council adopted
Resolution No. 1940, which by its terms the Council elected to
proceed under Government Code Sections 39560-39588 and did declare
as a public nuisance all weeds growing upon streets, sidewalks and
private property in the City, and all rubbish, refuse and dirt upon
parkways, sidewalks and private property. Said Resolution further
found such nuisances to be seasonal and recurrent nuisances; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 1940, April 2, 1991
at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, was fixed as
the time and place for hearing all objections to the proposed
removal and abatement of such nuisances. The City was unable to
timely mail the statutory notices of such hearing, and at the call
of the hearing on April 2, 1991, the public hearing was continued
to April 16, 1991 at 7:30 p.m. at the same location. The City
thereafter mailed timely notice of the continued hearing date,
pursuant to statute, to all affected property owners; and
WHEREAS, on April 16, 1991, the public hearing was called
and opened. No written or oral objections were made or received
from any of the affected property owners, and the public hearing
was thereupon closed;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS FOUND, DETERMINED AND RESOLVED AS
FOLLOWS:
1. The above facts are found to be true and correct.
2. The Fire Chief is hereby designated as the person to
perform the duties imposed by Government Code Sections 39560-39588
upon the Superintendent. The Superintendent is ordered to abate
the nuisances declared by Resolution No. 1940 by having the weeds,
rubbish, refuse and dirt removed, and for this purpose, the
Superintendent may enter upon the private property of the affected
property owners. The Superintendent is further ordered to cause
the abatement of the weeds from time-to-time hereafter as the weeds
recur pursuant to Section 39562.1 of the Government Code. Before
the Superintendent arrives, any property owner may remove the
weeds, rubbish, refuse and dirt at his/her own expense.
3. The Superintendent or the contractors awarded the
work, as the case may be, shall keep an account of the cost of
abatement in front of or on each parcel of land where the work is
done and shall submit an itemized written report of such costs to
the legislative body for confirmation, pursuant to Government Code
Sections 39574 and 39575.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1991, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
MAYOR
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
By:
Deputy
CERTIFICATE
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of a
Resolution adopted by the City Council for the City of San Jacinto
on the date therein set forth.
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
By:
Deputy