HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 3/6/1990AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
THE COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
DATE:
March 6, 1990
TIME:
7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALLs Rose, Divine, Redding, Boykin, Ford
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
NOTICE TO PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine
and will be enacted by one motion by the City Council in the form
listed.
There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion
unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests
specified items to be removed and/or discussed.
Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come forward,
upon invitation of the Mayor, state their name, address, and the Consent Calendar item number.
I .
CONSENT CALENDAR - City Manager
A. Approval of Minutes of February 20, 1990 as submitted.
(Receive and File).
B. Approval of Warrants No.'s 21668 through 21798 as
submitted by the Finance Director.
C. Treasurer's Office Time Deposit Register for February
1990. (Receive and File).
D. Ordinance for Adoption - Ordinance No. 894
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto governing development in hillside areas.
E. Ratification of Variance - Tentative Tract 25307
Applicant: John G. Culton
Location: south of Cottonwood, west of Palm
F. Resolution for Adoption - Resolutign No. RDA-90-1
A Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City
of San Jacinto Approving Tentative Parcel Map 25576.
G. Acceptance of Donation of (3) work stations from
Martin Aircraft Tool. (Staff recommends approval).
H. Authorization to establish
Agreement on behalf of
Shaver St., east of Hewitt.
(Staff recommends approval).
a Sewer Line Recapture
City for sewer line in
I. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1863
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California, prohibiting parking on Lyon
Avenue, between DeAnza Drive and the southerly City
limits. (Traffic Engineer recommends approval).
J. Acceptance of donation of 1977 Ford Van from the City
of Montebello.
March 6, 1990 Agenda
Page 2
Consent Calendar (continued)
K. Ordinance for Ado2tion - Ordinance No. 893
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of S
a
n
Jacinto regulating procedures for abating dangero
u
s
buildings by adopting the Uniform Code for the Abat
e
-
ment of Dangerous Buildings 1988 Edition,
Uniform
Building Code 1988 Edition, Uniform Plumbing Code
1988 Edition, Uniform Housing Code 1988 Edition,
Uniform Mechanical Code 1988, Uniform Sign Code 1988
Edition, Uniform Administrative Code 1988 Edition
and repealing conflicting ordinances, and revising
fees.
L. Tentative Tract Map 21564-10
Applicant: Rice Young Pacific
Location: Parkhill Collection
1. Authorize Mayor to execute record map and Sub-
division Agreement.
2. Release previous lien contracts on the property.
3. Authorize Mayor to execute a new substitute lien
contract covering Tract Nos 21564-1 through 81564-
10 (except 21564-4).
M. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda pursuant
to City Attorney.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to approve
consent calendar items A through M as recommended b
y
S
t
a
f
f
,
adopt Ordinance No 893, Ordinance No. 894, Resolut
i
o
n
N
o
.
1863 and Resolution No. RDA-90-1 and waive the rea
d
i
n
g
i
n
full. Vote:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment 3-139
Applicant: City Initiated
Proposal to review and amend as necessary Article 6
,
the R-2 zone and Article 7, the R-3 zone as the
y
relate to uses, height, setbacks, density, open space
,
and site development requirements, as well as an
y
other issues pertinent to development in the R-2 a
n
d
R-3 zones.
Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 897
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of
S
a
n
Jacinto, California, amending Ordinance 340, the zoning ordinance, related uses, height, setbacks
,
open space, and site development requirements in
t
h
e
R-2 and R-3 zones.
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to introduce Ordinance No. 897 to second reading an
d
w
a
i
v
e
the reading in full. Vote:
B. Zoning Ordinance Amendment 3-90
Applicant: City Initiated
Proposal to amend Article 15, Section 15.03, 30(a)
of Zoning Ordinance 340, related to parking for sing
l
e
family homes.
March 6, 1990 Agenda
Page 3
Public Hearings (continued)
Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 898
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of S
a
n
Jacinto, California, amending Ordinance 340, th
e
zoning ordinance, related to parking for single famil
y
homes.
Motion by:Seconded by: Action: to
introduce Ordinance No. 898 to second reading and wa
i
v
e
a
the reading in full. Vote
C. Zoning Ordinance Amendment 4-90
Applicant: City Initiated
Proposal to amend Article 5, Section 505, of Zon
i
n
g
Ordinance 340 related to rear yard setbacks for sin
g
l
e
family homes.
Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 899
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of
S
a
n
Jacinto, California, amending Ordinance 340, t
h
e
zoning ordinance, related to rear yard setbacks
f
o
r
single family homes.
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to introduce Ordinance No. 899 to second reading and
w
a
i
v
e
the reading in full. Vote:
ORAL COMMUNICATION
Members of the Audience wishing to address the City
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
s
h
o
u
l
d
f
i
l
l
out the appropriate form and hand it to the Deputy City Clerk prior
to the meeting. Council is prohibited by State law
f
r
o
m
t
a
k
i
n
g
a
c
t
i
o
n
on items not listed on the agenda unless of an emerg
e
n
c
y
n
a
t
u
r
e
.
IV. CITY DEPARTMENTS
A. Community Development
1. Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 877
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of
San Jacinto, California, amending Ordinance 340,
the zoning ordinance, related to fencing and re-
numbering several articles at said ordinance.
Motion by: Seconded by: Action:
Vote:
V. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/COMMENTS
A. 2010 Committee Update
B. Request for Water Line Installation
V I. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to adjourn to
March 13, 1990 at 6:30 p.m. Vote:
Meeting adjourned at p.m.
Next regular City Council meeting March 20, 1990
AT&T
Communications
795 Folsom Street
San Francisco, California 94107
Phone (415) 442-2600
NOTICE OF AT&T COMMUNICATIONS' APPLICATION FOR RATE INCREASE
On February 26, 1990, AT&T Communications of California,
Inc. ("AT&T") filed an Application with the California Public
Utilities Commission ("CPUC") to raise the price of AT&T's
intrastate interLATA long distance Directory Assistance
service from 40 cents to 60 cents. AT&T has previously
provided Directory Assistance at rates below cost pursuant to
CPUC orders. The proposed rate will recover AT&T's costs for
providing the service.
However, as a reasonable trade off for the increased
Directory Assistance charge, AT&T will offset the increased
revenues associated with the Directory Assistance increase by
reducing prices for the "additional minute" category of
daytime direct-dialed Long Distance Service calls traveling
over 150 miles within California. If this Application is
approved, a 10-minute direct-dialed daytime call between San
Francisco and Los Angeles would drop from $2.01 to $1.92.
A copy of the Application will be furnished upon written
request to:
Mr. Christopher Ensign
AT&T State Government Affairs
795 Folsom Street, Room 220
San Francisco, California 94107
Any comments or inquiries, including requests to receive
notices of dates, time and places of any hearings on this
application, may be directed to the California Public
Utilities Commission office at 505 Van Ness Avenue, San
Francisco, CA 94102. Customers interested in participating
in this proceeding may contact the Office of Public Advisor,
California Public Utilities Commission, 505 Van Ness Avenue,
San Francisco, CA 94102.
By
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Luis A. Aguilar, certify that the following is
true and correct:
I am a citizen of the United States, State of
California, am over eighteen years of age, and am not a party
to the within cause.
My business address is 795 Folsom Street, Room 240,
San Francisco, California 94107.
On February 27, 1990, I served the foregoing
document upon all known parties of record in this proceeding
by mailing by first-class mail a copy thereof properly
addressed in accordance with the attached list.
Executed this 27th day of February, 1990, at
San Francisco, California.
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
795 Folsom Street
San Francisco, CA 94107
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Ross S. Nammar, City Manager
SUBJ: Disability Retirement - Lt. Holmes
DATE: 03-02-90
As you recall, Lt. Holmes sustained injury the day of
the dedication of the Gromov Monument, while repelling
from the fire hose tower at the Police Department parking
lot.
You will further recall that as a result of the injury,
Council adopted Resolution No. 1843 retiring Mr. Holmes,
effective September 1, 1989. Please be advised now that
we were able to close Mr. Holme's worker's compensation
disability claim payment in the amount of $38,640.00 cash,
with the future medical expenses to be born by the City.
A rather interesting situation was brought to our attention
that Mr. Holme's withdrew from PERS safety retirement
in 1984. Therefore, the disability retirement now falls
under a different section of the Code, thereby the City
realizing a substantial savings in its financial liability
for Mr. Holme's life retirement.
At the regular meeting of March 20, 1990, a Resolution
will appear on the Agenda for adoption, informing PERS
that the disability was not a result of a direct violent
act perpetrated upon the member and that the incident
occurred during the performance of those portions of the
member's duties which are not hazardous or dangerous.
If you have any questions, or need further information,
please contact me since you are aware the subject matter
is confidential and should not be discussed in public.
ROSS S. NAMMAR
nr
MEMO
TO: Mayor Ford
FROM: Ross S. Nammar, City Manager
SUBJ: Silvas & Silvas vs. City of San Jacinto
DATE: 03-02-90
Just a reminder that we will be meeting with our defense
' counsel at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, March 6, 1990, to discuss
the above captioned lawsuit.
So that you won't be suprised, Doe No. 1, as named by
plaintiff's counsel, is you. Service on your behalf
was accepted and our legal counsel so advised. Don't
feel bad, Doe No. 2 is yours truly.
Respectfully submitted,
ROSS S. NAMMAR
nr
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ross S. Nammar, City Manager
DA'1E: March 1, 1990
SUBJ: Zoning Ordinance Amendment 3-89
The Multi-Family Housing Committee and the Planning Commission have developed
proposed amendments to the R-2 and R-3 Zone Regulations. My office has reviewed
these proposals. The proposed amendments to the R-2 Zone may cause some
hardship but is seemingly returning to the original intent of the R-2 Zone ie, allowing
a maximum of two units per lot.
Staff has some reservations regarding the proposed R-3 Regulations. The State, by
Redevelopment law and Government Code sections, as well as federal grants in aid,
require the City to meet its regional housing need. The ordinance, as proposed is
unclear as to how many units can be produced per parcel and for what cost.
The Committee has worked long and hard on this proposal. Most of the items no
doubt adequately address the impacts on the City as the Council directed. However,
Staff is of the opinion the ordinance should be reformatted so it can be determined
how the City's housing goals are being achieved, and what actual densities are being
allowed.
Staff recommends the hearing be continued and the ordinance be referred back to
Staff and the Planning Commission for clarification.
Respectfully,
ROSS S. NAMMAR
City Manager
RSN:lr
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ross S. Nammar, City Manager
DA1E: March 1, 1990
SUBJ: Request For Study Session
As you recall, the Council authorized the City Engineer to perform the Preliminary
Study and Update of the Master Drainage Plan for the purpose of establishing a
Storm Drain Financing District.
The Preliminary Study has been completed and reviewed by Legal Counsel, Financial
Consultant, the City Engineer, and Staff. Two possible methods of assessment
apportionment are possible and a variety of types of financing are applicable in order
to implement the Financing District. It is important the Council understand the data
and the implications on existing and future property owners, as well as developments
pending. Staff, therefore, requests the Council adjourn to a study session to be held
on Tuesday, March 13, 1990 at 6:30 p.m. to discuss this matter. Time is of the
essence as Staff is currently processing in excess of 15 different developments. We
need to be able to properly advise developers and avoid any unnecessary delays in
processing the developments.
Respectfully,
ROSS S. NAMMAR
City Manager
RSN:lr
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Ross S. Nammar, City Manager
SUBJ: National Guard Aimory Relocation
DATE: 02-28-90
Staff has had an opportunity to review the video cassette
submitted by Mr. Petty. After reviewing the video, Staff
has the following comments for your review:
1. The armory presents no economic benefit to the City
of San Jacinto.
2. The armory provides no property tax benefit to the
City of San Jacinto.
3. The armory provides no employment opportunities for
the City of San Jacinto.
4. The armory would require the City to donate land before
the construction of the armory could occur.
5. The relocation of the armory will expedite commercial
development at its current location, which will result
in an economic benefit for the City of Hemet. Staff
opposes assisting the City of Hemet, indirectly, by
relocating the armory to San Jacinto. If this community
is to attract viable commercial development, San Jacinto
must be compeititve and aggressive with Hemet.
If you should have any questions, or comments, please
do share them with us.
ROSS S. NAMMAR
City Manager
nr
AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
THE COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
DATE: March 6, 1990
TIME:
6:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Rose, Divine, Redding, Boykin, Ford
EXECUTIVE SESSION - Litigation (Silvas vs San Jacinto)
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to go into
executive session for litigation pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9 (a) Vote: Time:
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to go into
regular session. Vote: Time:
MINUTES
San Jacinto City Council
the Council Sitting as
the Redevelopment Agency
and Industrial Development Authority
Regular Meeting
February 20, 1990
The regular meeting of the San Jacinto City Council, the Council sitting as
the Redevelopment Agency and Industrial Development Authority was called to
order by Mayor Ford at 7:32 p.m. at the Community Center, 625 S. Pico.
Roll Call - Present: Councilmen Rose, Divine, Redding, Boykin and Ford
Staff Members Present: Assistant City Manager Garcia, Community Development
Director McNabb, Police Chief Kozma, Fire Chief Chad-
wick and Deputy City Clerk Sherman
I CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of minutes of February 6, 1990 as submitted. (Receive and file.)
B. Financial Report of Activity for the period January 1990. (Receive and
file.)
C. Approval of warrants No.s 21543 through 21667 in the amount of $310,725.23
as submitted by the Finance Director.
D. Ordinance No. 894 for adoption; governing development in hillside areas.
E. Request from Robert Nelson, Director of Riverside County Waste Management.
AB 939 and Recycling, requesting support of the County Waste Management
Advisory Council and authorization for the City Clerk to transmit a copy
of the minute action to Mr. Nelson before March 1, 1990. (Staff recom-
mends approval.)
F. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda pursuant to City Attorney.
Councilman Divine moved to approve the consent calendar with the exception of
of Item I-D (Ordinance No. 894) which will be acted on separately.
Seconded by Councilman Reding.
Motion carried 5-0.
I D. Ordinance No. 894, governing development of hillside areas.
Councilman Redding moved to reintroduce Ordinance No. 894 to second reading.
Seconded by Councilman Boykin
Motion carried 3-2. Ayes: Councilmen Redding, Boykin and Rose. Noes: Council-
men Divine and Ford.
Mayor Ford would like a list of all candidates wanting to serve on the 2010
Committee before the March meeting. Also, we need to advise the candidates
what their duties are. A formal application is being prepared.
II PUBLIC HEARING
A. Tentative Tract 25636, Amendment No. 1, and Variance 1-90.
Applicant: Sunny Hills Development/Famst Investment. Location: north
of the Ramona Expressway, west of Eagle Road. A request to convert an
existing condominium subdivision to a 52 lot subdivision map. Community
Development Director McNabb stated this is an appeal of the Planning
Commission's denial of Tentative Tract 25636 and Variance 1-90. The
Planning Commission denied the tract map and variance for two basic
reasons: 1. The proposed subdivision was inconsistent with the existing
II Public Hearing - continued
neighboring condominium development. 2. The proposed subdivision con-
tained too many sub-7200 sq. ft. lots. The applicant has now submitted
a revised proposal, further reducing the density, and establishing 7200
sq. ft. lots. A variance would be necessary for the 50 ft. wide lots.
The Mayor opened the public hearing. The clerk stated notice of the
public hearing has been advertised; affidavit of publication is on file.
Property owners of record within 300 ft. have been notified by mail;
declaration of mailing is on file. The clerk has received no written
or oral comments. The Mayor then asked if anyone in the audience wished
to be heard. The following individuals spoke. Delco Hagen, P.O. Box
931, Carlsbad, CA 92008, stated that 69 units were planned of which 11
have been built. After 45 days only one unit has been sold, and he
believes single family homes integrated with the present units makes
more sense. Also, he has reduced the number of lots from 58 to 36,
a loss of 22 lots.to obtain the required lot sizes for single-family
residential. Susan Gray, NBS Lowry, 1545 W. Florida, Hemet, stated
all the lots are now 7200 sq. ft. the builder is sensitive to the
neighboring dwellings and will build only one story houses- the develop-
ment is not part of the existing project and will have different C, C &
R's. the variance is needed for those lots which are 50 ft. wide. parkway
areas will be maintained, conditions are acceptable except Public Works
(3); the curbs and gutters are in place and handicap ramps can be in-
stalled at the time sidewalks are installed. Staff would have no prob-
lem eliminating (3). Councilman Redding asked about interiorisidewalks.
These will be provided. He also asked about the block walls; these will
be -provided -on all public streets. Staff recommends acceptance of Amend-
ment "A" of the tract. Tim Murakami, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, 16th floor,
Los Angeles, offered to help with any legal problems. Robert Colby,
1314 Bushy Tail Drive, spoke against the single family homes; he doesn't
think enough effort has been put into selling the condominiums which have
been,built.and is critical of the lapse of time since this .development
was started and the fact it is still dragging on. Mr. Colby is president
of the Homeowners Association in the adjacent tract. H. H. Wenzel, 1324
Sierra Seneca Street, said although he is not overjoyed at the prospect
of skate boards and bicycles etc in the area, the lower density construc-
tion is preferable. He said that Mr. Colby does not speak for all of the
homeowners in their tract; Mr. Hagen has lowered the density, is willing
to move some fences and will not build two story homes. He stated Mr.
Colby should be willing to work with Mr. Hagen for the benefit of all
concerned. Kenneth Wofferd, 650 Villa Chaparral, president of the Sunrise
Association finds the lower density much more desirable, but the presence
of children in the area may require their tract to become a "gated com-
munity" accessible only to the police and fire departments. Wants the
wood fence taken down and replaced with block. Ed Monce, sales, no ad-
dress given, did not speak. Community Development Director McNabb answer-
ed a few additional questions regarding drainage, curbs etc. to the Coun-
cil's satisfaction. The public hearing was closed.
Councilman Boykin moved to approve Tentative Tract 25636, Amendment No. 1, with
Conditions of Approval set by the Planning Commission, incorporating them
herein by reference; to approve Findigs of Fact of the Planning Commission,
incorporating them herein by reference, and to grant Variance 1-90 on lots
of 50 ft. substandard width and on 11 lots on which condominiums are
already built.
Seconded by Councilman Rose
Motion carried 5-0
-2-
III ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
A. Jan Leahy, 990 Chase Street requested a non-demoninational invocation at
Council meetings and has collected signatures of 39 residents who would
like such an invocation. Mrs. Leahy questioned the City Manager's class-
ification as a "Safety" employee in conncection with PERS retirement.
The Mayor answered Mrs. Leahy's question; until March 1988, the City Mana-
ger was entitled to "Safety" retirement; since March 1988 he has not been
classified "Safety."
IV CITY DEPARTMENTS
A. Community Development, Building Code Ordinance No. 893.
An ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto regulating
procedures for abating dangerous buildings by adopting the Uniform Code
for Abatement of Dangerous Buildings 1988 Edition; Uniform Building Code
1988 Edition; Uniform Plumbing Code 1988 Edition; Uniform Housing Code
1988 Edition; Uniform Mechanical Code 1988 Edition; Uniform Sign Code
1988 Edition, Uniform Administrative Code 1988 Edition and repealing
conflicting ordinances and revising fees. Community Development Direc-
tor McNabb explained some of the fee changes.
Councilman Rose moved to introduce Ordinance No. 893 to second reading and waive
reading in full.
Seconded by Councilman Divine
Motion carried 5-0.
B. 1 City Manager's Office - 16th Year CDBG Allocation
Two public hearings have been held at which staff received input from
the public. CDBG funds will be used on the 7th Street sewer and water
line project. At this time it is recommended the entire $86,000 be
allocated to this project.
Councilman Redding moved to allocate $86,000 CDBG funds to the 7th Street sewer
and water line project.
Seconded by Councilman Rose
Motion carried 5-0.
2. Civic Center Project - Phase I
It is staff's recommendation to rebid the project based on the follow-
ing factors: (a) the City's financial capability is such that we can
issue new bonds, and (b) the construction market at this time is very
competitive.
Councilman Redding moved to rebid the civic center and fire station project, Phase I.
Seconded by Councilman Rose.
Motion carried 4-1. Councilman Boykin voted no.
V MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
A. Cooperative activities with the City of Hemet. The Mayors and City Mana-
gers of the two cities have met to discuss areas of possible cooperation.
Three of these are as follows: Police/Fire joint dispatch and communica-
tions, refuse recycling and city annexations.
Councilman Boykin moved to authorize staff to study the feasibility of a joint
Safety/Communications Center, Refuse Recycling Center and Detention
'Facility:an-dr-suggest tha .t .the Mayor appoint:6m 'Councilmen to serve
on the annexation committee.
Seconded by Councilman Rose
Motion carried 5-0.
The Mayor appointed Councilman Redding and Mayor Pro Tern Boykin to
serve on a joint annexation committee.
16 February 1990 -3-
V Mayor and Council Members Reports/Comments - continued
B. Chief Kozma reported that the generator backing up the police and fire de-
partments in case of power failure has burned out and cannot be repaired
because it is too old, and parts are not available. The Chief checked out
generators and obtained a quote from Hemet Valley Tool for a 60 KW diesel
generator for $20,588.47 including tax and installation; three weeks delivery.
Councilman Divine moved to consider this an emergency and add this item to the agenda.
Seconded by Councilman Boykin
Motion carried 5-0.
Councilman Redding moved to instruct staff to circumvent the bidding process and
get the job done due to the emergency situation.
Seconded by Councilman Divine.
Motion carried 5-0.
C. The Mayor inquired about the feasibility of locating a National Guard Armory
in the City limits. Staff has made contact with Mr. Petty but has not dis-
cussed the matter or reviewed the video tape of the Palmdale Armory with Mr.
Petty as yet. Staff was instructed to report back on this at the next meeting.
D. Councilman Divine asked about the letter for Mr. Rebovich. Community De-
velopment Director McNabb said the letter was hand carried to him today.
Councilman Divine also asked about lr. Gauld. Chief Kozma has talked with
Mr. Gauld and settled his problems amicably.
E. Councilman Redding said the Western Riverside Transportation Committee meets
just before the COG meeting; he would like to relinquish attending. He will
continue to go and sit in on the COG meeting. Councilman Redding also wanted
to know when the Multi-housing subject will come before the Council again.
Community Development Director McNabb said this has been advertised for a
public hearing and will come before the Council at the March 6 meeting;
he also said the fencing ordinance will come before the Council March 6.
Councilman Redding asked if there are any upcoming retirement parties for
employees. Staff informed the Council that no retirement parties of any
kind have been scheduled at this time.
F. Councilman Boykin said the process should be started for a new city mana-
ger and should be discussed in executive session at the next meeting.
Mayor Ford said job descriptions should be obtained and an evaluation pro-
cess developed. Councilman Redding suggested it would be in order to have
a couple of Councilmen meet with Mr. Garcia; he volunteered as did Mayor
Ford. Mr. Garcia was asked to obtain a sample city manager recruitment flyer.
VI ADJOURNMENT
Councilman Boykin moved to adjourn to Executive Session at a site yet to be
determined at 6:30 p.m. March 6.
Seconded by Councilman Rose
Motion carried 5-0.
Meeting adjourned at 11:38 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Helen Sherman
Deputy City Clerk
20 February 1990 -4-
DATE 2At6/90
AGEND GLCD12
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS
UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK A/C 201398
CHECK
ISSUED TO
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
PARK HILL ANNEX
RESERVATIONS-PLANNING DEPT.
FEDERAL TAXES
NET PAYROLL
FEDERAL TAXES
STATE TAXES
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
SCHOOL-MARTINEZ
SCHOOL-CURTISS
SCHOOL FEES
SCHOOL-RICKMAN
SERVE-RENMAR CONST.
REFUSE COLLECTIONS
INVESTMENT
GROUNDWATER EXTRACTION
COUNCIL CONFERENCE
INTEREST PAYMENT 87-1
RIEMBURSE ACCOUNT
PROCESSING FEE
POSTAGE-WTR.BILLS
BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
CONFERENCE GARCIA & RANDOLPH
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
FEDERAL TAXES
STATE TAXES
FEDERAL TAXES
NET PAYROLL
CREDIT UNION
PERC
SJPD DUES
EXPENSES
FLOPPYS-BLDG.
NICK MARTINEZ SCHOOL FEES
SAMUEL RICKMAN CONFERENCE
RAYMOND CARLSON PC MEETING
BILL RUTLEDGE PC MEETING
RICHARD HIXSON PC MEETING
DAVID VER PLANK PC MEETING
GLENN TAYLOR PC MEETING
A-1 DISCOUNT LUMISCOPE-COMMUNITY CENTER
A-1 LOCK & KEY SERVICES
AKRON BRASS CO. NOZZLE REPAIR-F.D,
AL'S LAWNMOWER SHOP SUPPLIES & SERVICE
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP-BUILDING DEFT.
LOUIS R. ARROYA, JR. JANITORIAL SERVICE
ARROW PRINTING SUPPLIES-BLDG DEPT. & FIRE DEPT.
AUTO BODY OF HEMET BODY WORK-P.D.
E.S. BABCOCK & SONS LAB TESTS
BIRMINGHMA'S SHARPENING SHARPEN CHAIN SAW-PUBLIC WORKS
BOB'S LUMBER REDIMIX-WATER
21668* LAFCO
21669* KINGS INN
21670* FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
21671* CITY OF SAN JACINTO
21672* FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
21673* STATE OF CALIFORNIA
21674* HELEN SHERMAN
21675* SOUTHWEST REGIONAL
21676* REGIONAL TRAINING CTR.
21677* CURTIS CURTISS
21678* CACDA CONFERENCE
21679* WHITTIER MARSHALL
21680* O.K. ASSOC. INC.
21681* GREAT WESTERN SAVINGS
21682* STATE WATER RESOURCES
21683* CITY OF INDIO
21684* FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
21685* S.J. WORKERS' COMP.
21686* RIVERSIDE COUNTY
21687* U.S. POSTMASTER
21688* PATRICK WILLIAMS
21689* COX & COX
21690* IAPMA
21691* HELEN SHERMAN
21692* FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
21693* STATE OF CALIFORNIA
21694* FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
21695* CITY OF SAN JACINTO
21696* RIVERSIDE CO. EMP.
21697* PUBLIC EMP, ASSOC.
21698* S.J. POLICE ASSOC.
21699 ROSS NAMMAR
21700 KENSON NISHINO
21701
21702
21703
21704
21705
21706
21707
21708
21709
21.710
21711
21712
21713
21714
21.715
21716
21717
21718
1,500.00
532.00
11,975.08
79,026.96
1,073.04
2,489.71
395.00
223.00
230.00
352.00
130.00
20.00
52,452.11
300,000.00
15.00
26.00
55,697.50
1,682.70
40.00
500.00
439.00
4,410.50
24.00
430.00
14,524.87
3,238.79
1,229.32
85,487.03
3,901.96
306.28
989.00
73.08
21.34
500.00
45.50
100.00
100.00
L00.00
100.00
100.00
26.63
85.82
496.61
10.03
25.00
1,214.00
234.57
2,470.98
69.00
26.90
30.32
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
BLCD12
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS
PAGE
UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK A/C 201398
DATE 2/28/90
ISSUED TO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CALLAGHAN & CO.
CASTELLANO'S TOWING
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
HERMAN DONATE
JAVIER DAVILA
M.L. HANSEN
SAN JACINTO PARTNERS
DAVID SEARS
ALFORD & PUYEAR
MARIA SANCHEZ
CALIFORNIA RANCH HOMES
PATRICIA POWELL
REX FUNKE
COM SER CO.
D & M GRAPHICS
DAMON REFERENCE LAB,
J.F. DAVIDSON ASSOCIATE
DE BROS BLUEPRINTNG
DICTAPHONE CORPORATION
DRI-DEK CORPORATION
EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST
STEVE FILARSKY
FERGUSON.PRAET&SHERMAN
1ST MUNICIPAL DIVISION
FRONTIER AUDIO
GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
JOHN HARSANY JR. M.D.
HAYNES FIRE EXTG. SERV.
HEMET NEWS
HEMET SUPPLY CO.
HEMET VALLEY IMAGING
HOGAN & WILSON
HOUSE OF QUALITY
INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT
INLAND EMPIRE MNGR ASSC
INTERNATIONAL CONF.
J & M LANDSCAPE
C.R. JAESCHKE INC.
RANDY JOHNSON CONCRETE
JUAREZ AUTO UPHOLSTERY
KERN EQUIPT. CO .
KETCH-ALL CO.
LAKESIDE CHEVROLET
LEAGUE OF CALIF. CITIES
LEAGUE OF CALIF. CITIES
LONGS DRUG STORE
MANTEK
MARDEN-SUSCO
MOTOROLA CELLULAR
EDWARD MURRAY
DESCRIPTION
FLAGG-P.D. & F.D.
PUBLICATIONS
TWOING CHARGES-F.D.
CONSUMER DEPOSITS
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
MONTHLY MAINTENANCE
DECALS-P.D.
LABORATORY FEES-P.D.
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
ZONING MAPS
10 DX. CLEANING PADS-P.D.
EDGE RED-F.D.
UTILITIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
BROOMGWEEPER LEASE
REPAIR AUDIO SYSTEM-COMMUNITY CTR,
TEL+ COMM.
MEDICAL SERVICES
SERVICE-F.D.
ADVERTISING
SUPPLIES-CIVIC CENTER
SERVICES-P.D.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
AUTO PARTS
COLD MIX
ASSOCIATION DUES
PLAN CHECK
MAINT.- PARKHILL
BOLT. NUTS-UNIT 602
HANDICAP RAMPS
REUPHOLSTER CHAIR-CIVIC CENTER
PARTS-UNIT 4423
KETCH-ALL POLE-ANIMAL CONTROL
1-CHEVY P.U.
SUPPLEMENTS
CONF. REGISTRATION
SUPPLIES-P.D.
CLEANER/DECREASER-P.D.
WTR. PIPE & SUPPLIES
CELLULAR PHONES
RENTAL ATTENDANT
AMOUNT
71.93
172.55
140.50
787.94
28.78
37.37
464.64
427.77
15.23
500.00
13.43
383.66
9.98
50.00
804.20
723.49
76.63
591.60
80.00
352.27
59.67
392.58
120.00
1,437.50
1,565.25
147.00
271.61
348.00
51.00
184.69
36.59
176.30
1,032.00
2,292.89
217.60
15.00
331.80
1,425.00
2.90
450.00
35.00
471.74
176.54
11,493.53
42.70
500.00
33.93
158.77
463.45
239.27
30.00
CHECK
21719
21720
21721
21722
21723
21724
21.725
21.726
21727
21728
21729
21730
21731
21732
21733
21734
21735
21736
21737
21738
21739
21740
21741
21742
21743
21744
21745
21746
21747
21748
21749
21750
21751
21752
21753
21754
21755
21756
21757
21758
21759
21760
21761
21762
21763
21.764
21765
21766
21767
21768
21769
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
GLCD12
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS
PAGE 3
UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK A/C 201398
DATE 2/28/90
ISSUED TO
NATL BUSINESS FURNITURE
PACESETTER BUILDING
PACIFIC MANAGEMENT
PAGENET
QUALITY TRANSMISSIONS
RACEWAY FORD
MIKE READE CHEV.
RAY REEDER
RIVERSIE CO. FIRE CHIEF
ROYAL TRAVEL
SAFETY-KLEEN CORP.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
S.J. BUSINESS ASSC.
SAN JACINTO ELECTRIC
SENSUS TECHOLOGIES
SHARP BUILDING SUPPLY
SMART & FINAL
SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL
STEVE'S AUTO PARTS
SUNSHINE NURSERY
TECHNICAL PROD.CORP.
MYRNA TORRES
UNIVERSITY COPY SYSTEMS
CARL WARREN & CO.
WAYNES CUSTOM DRAPERIES
WESTERN NURSE SPEC.
BOB WILSON
XEROX CORPORATION
DESCRIPTION
TABLE & CHAIRS - CONFERENCE ROOM
WAGES/CAULEY,GRANCE & WOLFORD
CONTRACTOR INFORMATION SYSTEM
RENTAL RADIO PAGERS-P.D.
REBUILD TRANS-P.D.
PARTS-P.D.
PARTS-P.D.
WORK DONE-C.Y. & C.0
REGISTRATION-WILSON
AIR FARE-NAMMAR
SUPPLIES
UTILITY BILLS
FINAL PAYMENT
REPLACED PHOTO EYE-COMM. CENTER
WATER METERS
BUILDING SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES-COMM CENTER
UTILITY
FUEL
VEHICLE PARTS
STREET TREE INSTALL
FREIGHT CHARGE
REFUND-SECURITY DEPOSIT
TONER-CIVIC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
VERTICAL BLINDS-CIVIC CENTER
BLOOD DRAWS-P.D.
REIMBURSEMENT
MAINTENANCE-P.D.
AMOUNT
1,608.30
7,478.90
478.45
115.00
780.38
262.64
46.76
265.98
95.00
290.00
43.75
259.19
6,032.24
75.81
860.00
607.57
9.60
1,183.03
7,247.85
612.00
12,795.00
239.95
200.00
204.63
495.10
550.00
60.00
10.00
145.10
CHECK
21770
21771
21772
21773
21774
21775
21776
21777
21778
21779
21780
21.781
21782
21783
21784
21785
21786
21787
21788
21789
21790
21791
21792
21793
21794
21795
21796
21797
21798
FINAL TOTAL 703,157.14
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
TREASURER'S OFFICE
50,000.
500,000.
700,000.
11.32
894.44
956.67
98,000.
98,000
98,000.
677.83
677.83
644.08
300,000. 2,910.14
300,000. 2,910.14
TIME DEPOSIT REGISTER
Bank & Acct. No. Issued Maturity Rate
Amt. Inv. Int. This Mo.
State of California
9833794 02-20-85 Open 8.680 2,500,000.
Red.5133120 01-19-88 Open 8.680 400,000.
Great Western
389-600153-8 02-02-90 03-05-90 8.100
389-602847-3 02-21-90 03-23-90 8.100
389-606357-9 02-07-90 03-09-90 8.100
Far West Savings
013-10432-8 02-09-90 03-13-90 8.250
Red. 013-14016-5 02-09-90 03-13-90 8.250
013-16299-5 01-03-90 04-03-90 8.450
Home Savings
107-022763-0 02-15-90 03-17-90 8.000
107-022764-8 02-15-90 03-17-90 8.000
Total Invested $5,044,000 $ 9,682.45
February 1990 Register
Federal I.D. No. 95-6000780
CITY C.F SPaq 0-ACINTO
TREASURER'S OFFICE
TIME DEPOSIT REGISTER
CIVIC CENTER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT BONDS
Bank & Acct. No. Issued Maturity Rate
Am . Inv. Int. This M .
Great Western Bank
389-603896-9 02-09-90 03-12-90 8.100 1,200,000. 2,186.67
389-603897-7 02-01-90 03-05-90 8.100 1,420,000.
Home Savings
107-022762-2 11-30-89 02-27-89 8.250 100,000. 595.85
107-022769-7 02-12-90 03-14-90 8.000 1,200,000. 6,933.28
Gibraltar Savings
099-00095570 02-26-90 03-28-90 8.100 50,000. 277.78
Total Invested $3,970,000. 9,993.58
February 1990 Register
Federal I.D. No. 95-6000780
ORDINANCE NO. 894
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO GOVERNING
DEVELOPMENT IN HILLSIDE AREAS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Purpose
The purpose of this section is to encourage the orderly
development of hillside areas by relating the number
and distribution of dwelling units and other buildings
to the topography, so the terrain will suffer minimum
disfigurement by scarring from extensive cut and fill.
These regulations are also designed to minimize danger
to life and property due to the hazards of fire, flood
soil erosion, seepage, and destruction of natural
topography and plant material.
Section 2. Definitions
"Hillside" means areas which in general have a median
slope before grading of more than fifteen percent (15%)
on fifty (50 %) or more of the site. Less steep slopes
which strongly relate to areas of greater slope may
also be included within hillside areas.
Section 3. Development Standards
Prior to any development on a hillside, a development
plan shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for
approval. The Planning Commission shall consider such
plan at a public hearing duly advertised by State Law.
The decision of the Planning Commission is final,
unless an appeal is made to the City Council within
fifteen (15) days of the action of the Planning
Commission.
The development shall substantially conform to the
following standards.
A. Lot Design - Minimum lot sizes shall be based on
the grade of slope prior to grading in the
following manner:
MINIMUM LOT SIZE GRADE OF SLOPE
_7,200 sq. ft. net
0 - 15%
10,000 sq. ft. net
15 - 30%
20,000 sq. ft. gross 31 - 40%
40,000 sq. ft. gross Greater than 40%
1. In the 15 - 30% grade classification, 70% of the
lots shall have 10,000 sq. ft. with the overall
average of 10,000 sq. ft.
2. In the 30% - 40% grade classification, 70% of the
lots shall have a minimum of 20,000 sq. ft. with
the overall average of 20,000 sq. ft.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
31
32
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
3. In the 40% grade classification - 70% of the lots
shall be 40,000 sq. ft. or more with the average
of all lots a minimum of 40,000 sq. ft.
4. In all cases, where deviation from the minimum lot
size are permitted, no lot shall be less than
7,200 sq. ft.
5. Grade of slope map - In order to determine the
areas to which the various grade of slope
classification, apply, the applicant shall submit
a grade of slope calculating the change in
elevation or natural grade per one hundred (100)
feet of horizontal distance. The contours of said
map shall be in five (5) feet increments.
For purposes of calculating median slope the
following formula shall be used:
S = 0.002296xIxL
A
Where: S = average natural slope in percent
I = natural contour interval in feet
L = length of natural contours in feet
A = acres of property
0.002296 - constant which converts square feet into
acres and expresses slope in percent.
6 Minimum parcel dimensions - In order to comply
with the minimum lot area required by these
regulations, there are no absolute parcel widths
and depths. Buildable area is considered to be
contiguous area of the lot which is less than 30%
of slope.
7. Setbacks - Front, side, and rear set backs shall
be determined based on the precise development
plan and consideration of the constraints.
8. Building Height - Dwelling and other accessory
structures shall not exceed thirty five (35') feet
in overall height as measured from the median
grade across the buildable area.
9. Parking - parking shall be as noted in the zoning
ordinance.
10. Building Pads - the maximum building pad for each
parcel shall be as follows:
SLOPE
PAD STANDARDS
0-15 %
100% of lot may be graded pad
15-30 %
60% of lot may be graded
31-40 %
35% of lot may be graded
40% or greater
20% of lot may be graded
11. Building Design - Buildings shall normally be
designed to have sliding glass doors and open
recreational areas facing the down hill side of
the lot in order to take advantage of the views.
B. Soils, Grading, and Drainage
The general grading guidelines for a hillside
development is as follows:
SLOPES
Cut and fill slopes shall generally not exceed 30' in
height, unless otherwise approved by Planning
Commission. The cut or fill slope shall generally be
located on the down hill adjacent property.
2
4
5
2. RETAINING WALLS
Retaining walls shall not exceed six feet (6') in
height except in front yards areas where they shall not
exceed thirty six inches (36") in height. However,
retaining walls necessary for the construction of an
adjacent driveway may be constructed to a maximum of
six feet (6') in height any where on the property.
DRAINAGE AND EROSION
All graded areas shall be protected from wind and water
erosion through acceptable slope stabilization methods
such as planting, walls, or netting.
On site catch basins or siltation basins, as well as
energy absorbing devices may be required as a means to
prevent erosion as well as to provide for ground water
recharge.
Natural drainage courses should generally be protected
from grading activity.
Where brow ditches are required, naturalize with plant
material and native rock.
The outside corners or edges of all cut and fill
slopes, except at the tops of slopes shall be required
to be rounded to eliminate the sharp corners and shall
have a minimum curvature of radius of at least five
feet (5').
"LANDFORMING" Shall be applied to all slopes adjacent
to public streets, gateways, and public view areas, as
well as all slopes greater than one hundred feet (100')
in length or ten feet (10') in vertical height.
(a) Landforming shall be accomplished by the use of
variable slope ratios, undulating the tops and
toes, screening of terraces and down drains,
varying of surface features, and by landscaping.
(b) Rear and side yard slopes between adjacent lots
within the same project need not landformed unless
they are greater than one hundred feet (100') in
length or ten feet (10') in vertical height.
C. DRIVEWAYS AND STREETS
Driveways and streets should be designed in such a
way as to avoid excessive cut and fill slopes. As
a general rule excessive shall be interpreted to
be slopes greater than 30° in vertical height.
6
7
8
9
0
11
2
1
14
5
6
7
8
9
20
21
22
23
24
9 5
26
27
28
9 9
30
3
32
Gradient and Driveway Width Adjacent to Garage
Entrance
Driveways shall have a maximum gradient of 12%
along the center line of that portion of the
driveway located within twenty feet (20') of the
garage entry. The width of the driveway shall not
be less than the width of the garage opening(s)
within twenty feet (20') of the drywall entrance.
2. GRADIENT AND DRIVEWAY WIDTH OF REMAINDER OF
DRIVEWAYS
The maximum gradient for driveways farther than
twenty feet (20') of the opening shall be 20%
along its centerline and shall not be less than
twelve feet (12') in width.
3. VERTICAL TRANSITION
Any vertical transitions shall be so designed and
constructed so that any portion of a vehicle with
a twelve feet (12') wheel base and five inches
(5") under vehicle clearance will not make contact
with the driveway surface.
4. -STREET GRADES
Street grades shall not normally exceed fifteen
percent (15%) in grade.
5. STREET IMPROVEMENTS
All street improvements shall be to City Standards
except as allowed by these regulations.
a. Widths - In order to minimize grading, where
lot sizes average greater than 10,000 sq.
ft., street right of way may be reduced to
forty feet (40'), with thirty two feet (32')
of curb to curb width.
b. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk - Where hydrology
permits, curb in the hillside area may be of
the "roll curb" type. Sidewalk is not
required within the forty feet (40') right of
way area.
C. In the forty feet (40') right of way, parking
shall be permitted on one side only if
standard curb and gutter is constructed and
on both sides when "roll curb" is used.
D. INFRASTRUCTURE
All lots on the hillside shall be connected to a
public sewer system. All lots on a hillside shall
be serviced by underground utilities. Water mains
shall be of an appropriate size to provide the
minimum fire protection required by the City.
2
3
4
5
6
7
14!!
511
611
711
E. LANDSCAPING
As a condition to the final approval of a hillside
development plan and prior to the recordation of
any map or issuance of a building permit,
whichever occurs first, landscaping plans,
including planting design and irrigation system,
all of which are prepared by a licensed landscape
architect, shall be submitted and approved by the
Planning Commission.
All cut, fill, and natural slopes, not
specifically designated as permanent open space
shall be planted with deeply rooted plants or
other plants approved by the City, which are able
to acclimate to the environment. Intermediate
stabilization will be required while deeply rooted
are developing.
The Planning Commission shall consider the
following in reviewing, the landscape plans. The
planting of slopes for stabilization,, the fire
resistance ability, durability, size, and quality
of the plant material, and planting design. Proof
of the ability of the soil to sustain the plant
.material may also be required.
Slope planting and irrigation systems shall be
provided by the applicant on all slopes of three
(3) or more feet in vertical height. The subject
cut and fill slopes shall be adequately planted
with landscaping consisting of approximately one
third (1/3) shrubs and trees, and the remaining
two thirds (2/3) grass or ground cover and/or
trees and shrubs.
18
9
20
2
22
23
24
25
26
27
23
99
3
32
30
F. IRRIGATION
All systems and planting shall be complete and
operative on an individual lot basis before final
approval of finished grade and before occupancy of
any buildings.
Maintenance of required landscaping is the
responsibility of the landowner(s). A landscape
maintenance bond for a minimum of one year's
duration from the date of acceptance of
landscaping shall be required to guarantee that
all plants shall be maintained and replaced as
necessary, until the property is permanently
occupied.
G. FIRE PROTECTION
1. In fire hazard areas, unobstructed fire protection
equipment access easements shall be required to
all parts of the development and to adjacent area,
which are potential fire hazards. The Fire Chief
shall recommend to the Planning Commission the
necessary locations of said easements.
Additionally, the Fire Department may require fuel
modification zones to minimize the fire threats to
private property.
2. Any construction within two hundred feet (200') of
a fire hazard area, including stairs, balconies,
porches, and open structure under buildings, which
are not of non-combustible materials shall be
protected by one hour construction.
All eaves shall be fully boxed in with exterior
stucco or its equivalent fire resistive
construction. Any required vents shall be covered
with one fourth inch (1/4") mesh or its
equivalent.
All roof coverings within 200 feet of fire hazard
area shall be rated as Class A in accordance with
the Uniform Building Code Standards.
Section 4. PUBLICATION
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper
of general circulation printed and published in the County
of Riverside, State of California.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the said City Council on
January 16, 1990.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council duly held on the day of , 1990 by
bye following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
Mayor, CHy of San Jacinto
CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF SAN JACINTO)
I Helen Sherman, Deputy City Clerk of the City of San
Jacinto, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy
of Ordinance No. 894 duly adopted by the City Council of the
City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the
day of , 1990.
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto
this day of , 1990.
BY
Deputy City Clerk
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: February 20, 1990
SUBJ: . Variance 2-90
Tentative Tract 25307 has previously received approval from the Planning Commission
and PUD 6-89 is pending approval based upon the proposed parking variance.
Guest parking is a requirement of the PUD Ordinance. The applicant in order to
satisfy the parking requirement of the PUD Ordinance must either provide parking in
the planned open area or in driveway areas. The City Council expressed desires to
maximize open space, therefore the applicant proposed a variance to allow parking in
driveways of 20' or more.
This item was heard by the Planning Commission on February 14, 1990. The
Planning Commission approved the variance subject to City Council ratification.
Respectfully submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: February 16, 1990
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
VARIANCE 2-90
APPLICANT: John G. Culton
990 W. Florida Avenue
Hemet, Ca 92343
(714) 658-7211
DESCRIP110N
A proposal for a variance to accommodate parking requirements in a Planned Unit
Development of 38 lots on approximately 6 acres.
CURRENT ZONING
CURRENT GENERAL PLAN
CURRENT USES
EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT
PUD 6-89
EXHIBIT "A"
EXHIB11 "B"
EXHI311 "C"
EXHIB11 "D"
EXHIB11 "E"
DISCUSSION
The related Tentative Tract 25307 and PUD 6-89 have been previously approved at
the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 11, 1989. The City
Council approved the PUD subject to the granting of the variance to recognize
parking in driveways larger than 20'.
A two car garage is required as prescribed in the City's Zoning Ordinance 340,
Article 15.
The ordinance also requires one guest space per unit. The applicant has submitted
Variance 2-90 requesting the recognition of driveways more than 20' long as the guest
parking.
PLANNING COMMISSION February 14, 1990 Page No.1
The ordinance requires one R.V. parking space per ten units. Traditionally this has
not been required if the Conditions Covenants and Restrictions specifically ban their
parking in the development.
The City Council in reviewing the proposed PUD did not want the parking to occur
within the recreational area.
To approve the variance, the Planning Commission must make the findings of fact to
all of the circumstances prescribed in Ordinance 340, Article 18, Section 18.06 (B)
apply. They are as follows:
That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the
land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to
other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district.
2. That strict or literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance
would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical difficulty or
unnecessary physical hardship or would deprive the applicant of rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the
terms of this ordinance
3. The special circumstance do not result from the actions of the applicant;
and
4. That granting the variance request will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands,
structures, or buildings in the same district.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 90-9 approving Variance 2-90
subject to City Council ratification.
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
PLANNING COMMISSION February 14, 1990 Page No.2
FINDINGS OF FAC1 VARIANCE 2-90
1. The PUD ordinance requires one guest parking space per unit.
2. The PUD ordinance requires Recreational Vehicle parking areas.
3. The same request has been approved in previous cases with a minimum 20'
driveway including T19271 and PUD 1-83, T24047 and PUD 2-87, and PUD 5-
89.
4. The circumstance of providing double garages and driveways make it difficult to
accommodate guest parking requirements on curbside locations only.
5. No special condition peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved exists
on the property.
6. The strict interpretation of the ordinance makes it difficult on the applicant
and the variance has been granted in other circumstances.
7. The hardship is a result of the zoning and the size of the project.
8. The same variance has been previously granted for other similar projects.
PLANNING COMMISSION February 14, 1990 Page No.3
AGRI - RAIG
COTTONWOOD AVENUE
71. FIL I
R-1, Single Family •
uJ
— SYC
VAc-
R - 1
VAC-
\K -1
R-1, Single Family
ZOO '
(flEtt.l6ED
Gory)
R-I
STREE
,..67 -L
-1, Single Fami <zC
EXHIBIT "A"
_VARIANCE 2-90 i
CURRENT ZONING
Q.9
ow Density Residential
A6ft(- (MG
0 -
COTTONWOOD AVENUE--
AG FP i e
W /kC -I .11 k
Low Density Residential
I Ci7 ;
Ltt
11='200 1
OiebtkED
corv)
Vhco
R-1
-A7.6 STREE
CD AGR/- RE/7)
3
EXHIBIT "B"
VARIANCE 2-90
CURRENT GENERAL PLAN
zo
A6RI- (MUG
Single Family Residential
COTTONWOOD AVENUE-
Residence
Vacant
— SYCP1 HOKE — Lg •
(ri)
Vacant
Single family Residential
01 \RA/
SITE
Va c ant
+? /-- Single -Familj, Residential
!cc)) /1 200 1
4_, .
LN-
c OiEbYGED
. 0 corv)
•-7
I rc5c
VAC °
R-I
ia I
Vacant
(1)
VAC.
- STREE
_J
c:C
0_
EXHIBIT "C"
VARIANCE 2-90 I
CURRENT USES
(2._ 9
AGM- 1 MG
COTTONWOOD AVENUE
VAC
R-1
MORE — L14 -
A6 Kt - ttef
° c Oi Eb1.16 ED
o Coris0
VAC ,
R-1
STREE
0 AGRI - RES11)
-EXHIBIT "D"
VARIANCE 2-90 !
EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT
COTTONWCOD AVERIE TY f %CAL rtntomiN &ALUM 4? Vi U. • $11 OLINL l'ALM AVENUE •
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: February 20, 1990
SUBJ: Tentative Parcel Map 25576
This item was heard by the Planning Commission on February 14, 1990. The subject
property falls within the redevelopment boundary and therefore needs ratification from
the Redevelopment Agency.
The Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map 25576 subject to ratification
by the City Council acting as the Redevelopment Agency.
Respectfully submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
February 16, 1990
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25576
APPLICANT: JOHN G. CULTON
990 W. Florida
Hemet, Ca. 92343
(714) 658-7211
DESCRIPTION
A proposal to create 3 parcels from approximately 1.9 acres
generally located 300 feet north of Esplanade on the west side of
San Jacinto Avenue.
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT "A"
EXISTING ZONING EXHIBIT "B"
CURRENT USES EXHIBIT "C"
EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT EXHIBIT "D"
DISCUSSION
The request is to divide approximately 1.9 acres into 3 lots of
.52 acres, .63 acres, and .74 acres.
The proposed lots would comply with the City's zoning ordinance.
San Jacinto Avenue is designated as a "Special Treatment - Urban
Arterial Highway" in this vicinity. A right of way of 110' to 134'
would be designated depending upon the circumstances.
The right of way for the subject site should be the same as the
commercial center to the south at the corner of San Jacinto Avenue
and Esplanade which is an 88' right of way.
Tentative Parcel Map 25576 was formerly Tentative Parcel Map 20028
and had been approved in may of 1984. The Tentative Parcel Map
CITY COUNCIL March 6, 1990 Page No.1
20028 has since expired.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt
Resolution No. RDA 90-1, Staff Report, Findings of Fact and
Conditions of Approval approving Tentative Parcel Map 25576 and
grant a Negative Declaration.
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
FINDINGS OF FACT
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25576
1. The subject site is outside of the 500 year floodplain and is
1/2 mile from the nearest seismic study zone to the southeast.
2. Utilities are available to the site.
3. San Jacinto Avenue is a designated Urban Arterial Highway with
an existing right of way of 88' at this location and an
ultimate right of way of 134'.
4. Tentative Parcel Map 25576 is in substantial compliance with
the City's Subdivision Ordinance 673 and the Subdivision Map
Act.
5. Tentative Parcel Map 25576 is within the range of the
Stephen's Kangaroo Rat habitat.
6. A biological report will not be required as the subject site
is less than 2 acres and surrounded by development.
CITY COUNCIL March 6, 1990 Page No.2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25576
1. San Jacinto Avenue shall be dedicated to its ultimate 44 ft.
right-of-way.
2. The property owner shall design and have approved public
improvement plans showing the following:
A. Adequate water supply to all lots;
B. Sewer laterals to all lots;
C. Curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street paving;
D. Undergrounding of utilities where possible and street
trees.
3. The property owners shall enter into a recordable agreement
obligating themselves to install all required public
improvements when either one of the following occurs:
A. Any one of the parcels develops further; or
B. The property immediately to the south develops further.
4. Owners of the existing businesses shall be served notice by
the City that they are not in compliance with the Zoning
Ordinance as to onsite improvements. Said improvements shall
be installed upon further development of the property or under
the following schedule, whichever comes first:
A. Screening requirements - 2 years;
B. Parking and landscaping - 10 years;
C. Signs - 5 years.
5. All applicable development fees shall be paid prior to the
issuance of building permits.
CITY COUNCIL March 6, 1990 Page No.3
Medium Density Residential
Light Industrial;
Community Commercial
Community Commercial
ESPLANADE
High Density Re s idential
Community Commercial
EXHIBIT "A"
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN
TPM 25576
AVENUE
Community Commercial
R-2, Residential ;
s1 act
C-2, Commercial
A. 4
• rant
ems
C-2, CommerCial C-2,\
Commercial
Comrnercial.
CD"
C-2, Commercial'
4-4 -
:
r-D
M-1, Light Industrial :
ESPLANADE
R-t, Residential Trailer
C-2, Commercial 1
EXHIBIT "B"
EXISTING ZONING
TPM 25576
AVENUE
C-2, Commercial
z
Transmission Re air
RW12.
0.14 ac. eta
AZ I
Office and
Storage ;
. 0.41 At.tiet
•
Vacant
Shopping Center! SAN JACINTO Retail
Center'
Vacant
Vacant -Church
Shopping Center i
ESPLANADE
Trailer Park Commercial Office
EXHIBIT "C"
CURRENT USES
TPM 25576
AVENUE
Vacant
nmiz
0.14k. 4L
c:C
4-)
(1.)
ESPLANADE 88' Secondary Roadway
AVENUE
EXHIBIT "D"
EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT
TPM 25576
TENTAT IN TH CITY OF 501 JACINTO vet ARC ISPIANNIt 'mg . r.40' • //r re wok. HIP BEING A DIYIS1011 Of PARCEL 4- OF MKCEL MAP RECOIDED Fn. 28i ir3 AS 5}1b1,1111 BY MAT DM FILE ffi COOL 11 PAGE (00 OF PAVEL I1M51 I 11C. CR III. CO. SP,M JP<4(10 rtIvE51013 ci• IOLUASLX11, i LTOM ,190 VV. FLO12..10A p. HEMET. CA 913 44 fVTTN .101-111 Cl.31.T01.7 11.1cr- 51311 .3M.ItiTO 'An JACINTO nCh 91353 9/5- 605-7 IIDT I. 11%st5s ors MD. 411'1W-010 1, E11ST. lOMP: • 9. 111M. S1/1 • ankAkt. 4. 1.1111.1T11.1 Itl..GTE ISO1311MIA,NCMCI aft. s.c.L sr.r8 twon.tutrxei zo-oe-riso mrattk SW- CAI or sulikorcro 7.3 LtiArri sr. s.1 bs41vo c.cALGAS TICO IUMSBE Mint S 11111 ALLA COHSISTS Or lit t1IU. C.13MU1LIS CPAIL5119 DT 113E. AMIE SMD ClUtlE25 . 0 4 TIIT/kL 411-th• 1.90 I40- or FrilLCILS • 3 B. Kan Of SII s 13405. SA.11...WI1cTO ST. 51411PLI3(70. CN- 11113', anitat.AL PIM • artriaCiti. F7)2 14 W72.LY
2
RESOLUTION NO. RDA-90-1
3
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
4 CITY OF SAN JACINTO APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25576
5
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
6 DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
WHEREAS, Parcel Map 25576 is located within the boundaries of the
Redevelopment Agency.
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission acts as the Redevelopment
Agency's planning body.
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding
Parcel Map 25576 on February 14, 1990.
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission made recommendations to the
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
WHEREAS, The Redevelopment Agency has reviewed the staff reports
and Planning Commission minutes.
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission made the determination that:
FINDINGS OF FACT
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25576
The subject site is outside of the 500 year floodplain and is 1/2 mile
from the nearest seismic study zone to the southeast.
Utilities are available to the site.
San Jacinto Avenue is a designated Urban Arterial Highway with an
existing right-of-way of 88' at this location and an ultimate right-of-way
of 134'.
Tentative Parcel Map 25576 is in substantial compliance with the City's
Subdivision Ordinance 673 and the Subdivision Map Act.
Tentative Parcel Map 25576 is within the range of the Stephen's
Kangaroo Rat habitat.
A biological report will not be required as the subject site is less than 2
acres and surrounded by development.
31
32 WHEREAS, The REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY reviewed each
Planning Commission recommendation including their Findings of Fact.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, Tentative
Parcel Map 25576 is approved in accordance with the Findings of Fact and
Conditions of Approval.
MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED this 6th day of March 1990 by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
A'TTEST:
Chairman
Secretary
CERTIFICA'l E
I hereby certify the foregoing is a true copy of Resolution No. RDA-90-
I duly adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto on
the 6th day of March 1990.
Secretary
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Ross S. Nammar, City Manager
SUBJ: Acceptance of Donation
DATE: 03-01-90
Pursuant to the Government Code, Section 37354, it is
requested that the City Council accept the donation
of three (3) work stations for the Department of Community
Development at a total value of $2,455, from Mr. Frank
Negri of Martin Aircraft Tool.
nr
4ffilt. s e en et-Trian
STATEMENT OF RECAPTU AGENDA
This Statement of Recapture approved this (- day of
pertains to certain City provided sewer improvements
located on Shaver Street, beginning at the east boundary of
Tract 22677 thence a distance of 100 feet east.
WHEREAS, Tract 22677 sewer was installed,
WHEREAS, recapture to that sewer is by separate agreement,
WHEREAS, the City paid for installation of laterals on said
sewer of Tract 22677 to serve the lots on the south side,
WHEREAS, the City paid for the installation of 100 feet of
sewer easterly of Tract 22677,
NOW, THEREFORE, be it and it is hereby agreed as follows:
That the City of San Jacinto shall not permit any person to
connect to said eight (8) inch sewer line without first paying
to the City of San Jacinto the sum of $30.75 for each
connected front foot on said eight (8) inch sewer line and
$800 for the six (6) inch lateral installed and $700 for the
four (4) inch lateral installed. Said connecting frontage
affected by this Agreement is shown by Exhibit Map "A"
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
This Agreement is made in consideration of the contribution by
the City of the sum of $17,150 to the cost of said eight (8)
sewer line and one (1) four (4) inch and six (6) six (6) inch
laterals and in recognition of the equities therein and is
executed by the City Manager of the City of San Jacinto
pursuant to the authority granted by motion duly made,
seconded and passed by the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto at its meeting held the day of
, 19
CITY MANAGER OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
EXHIBIT " (1/4 Car. $.( .35 I 'S. Axe' .p^.9 f: 6-77. *A ' • otr N. SI I 4.6.8 Ac 3 ( 51 +,8..s- • n.% 9 ( 10 1 LiJ TRACT 22677 2.38 Ac 2 ..34.41c 2. 34 Ac 0.44 T. 7 _T. 41. 9 ..rs's A, • of .571AVE-R Is 57.: TIE
AGENDA
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: March 1, 1990
SUBJ: . Placement Of "No Parking" Signs On Lyon Avenue
Staff has received numerous complaints from citizens living and driving in the vicinity
of the San Jacinto Auction on Lyon Avenue. The shoppers using the auction tend to
park on the street to avoid the tight maneuvering of the parking lot.
The City Traffic Engineer has studied the matter and determined there are definite
hazards created by this road side parking. Attached is a copy of the engineer's
report.
Staff, therefore recommends the adoption of Resolution No. 1863 authorizing "No
Parking" signs to be placed on Lyon Avenue between De Anza and the southerly City
Limits.
ROSS S. NAMMAR
City Manager
RSN:lr
RESOLUTION NO. 1863
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING PARKING ON
2
LYON AVENUE, BETWEEN DEANZA DRIVE AND THE
SOUTHERLY CITY LIMITS.
3
This Resolution is adopted with reference to the following
4 facts:
5 Lyon Avenue at present is not constructed to its ultimate width
6
and has minimum shoulder width which impedes safe and efficient
flow of traffic.
7 That it is the recommendation of the Traffic Engineer to create
a safer area and reduce possible vehicle vs. vehicle and
8 vehicle vs. pedestrian conflict if parking were prohibited and
which would permit a more positive flow of traffic.
9
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of 10 the City of San Jacinto in regular session this 6th day of
March, 1990 as follows:
11
1. Council concurs with the findings of fact.
12
. It is hereby directed that parking shall be prohibited along
13
Lyon Avenue, between DeAnza and the southerly City limits.
14 . The Department of Public Works shall cause the appropriate
markings to be placed along Lyon Avenue and this Resolution
15
shall become effective upon the placement of such markings.
16
. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution. 17
MOVED, PASSED, AND ADOPTED AT REGULAR MEETING OF SAID 18 CITY COUNCIL duly held the 6th day of March, 1990
19
20 ATTEST:
21
22
Mayor
23
24
Deputy City Clerk 25
26
CERTIFICATE
27
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of a Resolutio
duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto 28 on the date therein set forth.
29
30
Deputy City Clerk 31
32
CLAW
MMVMMI
MMIUMI
MOW MIMI
MUM,
MIMI MIMI
MEW MIMI
J.F. Davidson Associates, I nc.
MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
TO: Brian McNabb
Director of Community
City of San Jacinto
201 E. Main Street
P.O. Box 488
San Jacinto, CA 92383
opment
8911850
FROM: Ben Dobbins, City Traffic Engineer
DATE: February 6, 1990
R No Parking area - Lyon Avenue Adjacent to the
Auction
A review of the area found minimum shoulder width for
parking on the west side of Lyon Avenue adjacent to the
Auction. The east side next to the Auction has wider
shoulders, but parking there creates visibility problems
with vehicles entering and exiting the Auction parking lots.
It is recommended that R26A (No Parking Anytime) be placed
on the east and west sides of Lyon Avenue in Front of the
Auction. These signs should be placed at approximately 300
foot spacings.
The No Parking area should create a safer area and reduce
the possible vehicle versus vehicle and vehicle versus
pedestrian conflicts.
JBD:lrs:AI7
3426 Tenth Street • P.O. Box 493 • Riverside, CA 92502 • (714) 683-0209 • FAX 714-686-5807
(2)
AGENDA
From tIi cfficecf CHIEF OF PCSIG-IC
MEMORANDUM
To:
City Manager
From:
Chief of Police
Date:
March 1, 1990
Subject: Acceptance of 1977 Longbed Ford Van from the City of
Montebello for Use by the Police Department
In accordance with Section 37354 of the California Government Code,
it is requested the city council authorize acceptance of a 1977
Ford Van for the City of Montebello for use as a police crime scene
unit.
The police department has for several years attempted to procure a
van through either the budget process or donation. With the growth
of our city and department, the need for a crime scene van has
become a must. The van will be equipped with existing equipment
and future purchases. It is not a pursuit unit and therefore will
not require emergency equipment.
The Montebello fire department has maintained the vehicle in good
condition with the exception of a few damaged spots and the vehicle
has low mileage.
Your prompt attention to this matter is appreciated.
J 7/2_
r AU AMERICA CITY')
1600W. BEVERLY BOULEVARD
MONTEBELLO, CA 90640
(213) 725-1200
SALE OF SURPLUS
GENERAL FUND
001-7858
Date :
The City of Montebello accepts the
Name : 0 r
Address : s
Phone No ( 7/t( ) 2-
of surplus vehicle #( s) 66
offer of $ °DWI-TOO from
1904- e 17e •
7. 3W/si ._7;i1 6/Ar ro c4-r— ,
for the purchase
, a
VIN 00044 Lice,tv E 6T3S-)-4
rvorJ fi LicEIVSG 1E2,12'33
P-vt CE04),".GUL ccu-tkwuzi4Lk4rr•• io
The City makes no warranty as to condition or use of the vehicle
and offers the vehicle in "as is" condition.
Purchaser agrees to remove, license, and resmog the vehicle at
purchaser's expense and further agrees to hold harmless the City
of Montebello and its agents from any liability or incidents
arising from the sale of the referenced vehicle.
Dated:
Offer accepted on behAlf of the City of Montebello by:
Russ Caballero, urchasing Agent
REGISTRATION EXPIRES TYPE LICENSE NUMB
DEC 31 99 '
33 689826
10PfMENT -05r/r1OTOR VEHICLES
VALIDATED P IN LI EU EX 689826 L . REGISTRATION CA RD 0
ENGINE OR ID NUMBER
„CALIFORNIA SMOG REGISTRAT7ON EXP-111—ES -r-TYPE LICENSE NUZ
DEC 31 80 33 1E81283
VERIFY CURR LIC. NO. MAXE
E14HFIY00044
E VAN
A DATE ISSUEL
• 1/16a9
YEAR MODEL SHOWN IS R -ASEISON MANUFACTURER AND DEALER REPRESENTATI
O
N
BODY TYPE MODEL .V I , CMS e---OA,TE FIRST SOLD CLASS * YR IR mote TYPE VTR
i
/17 257 13+,1 .7" ' * ' ' ;",,,, nt TAX OR PART BAIL • E AX WC UNLADEN WEOGNY" TAB NUMBER
2 D /104780 -X3 *894
FOR:)) K
77 32V
TOTAL FEES
I NFEE
teor
MONTEEELt.:0 -CTY
1600 .b EVERLY EL -
MONTEBEL4..-p_ ' CA 90640
READ REYERSE SIDE - IMF•ORT ANT litSTRUCTIONS 52100
0
rw
A
0
• ‘/,fl-
1MMERCIAL
E F3.11 4. X VIP
_.„
MAKE - YEAR MODEL SHOWN IS BASED ON MANUFACTU
R
E
R
A
N
D
D
E
A
L
E
R
R
E
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
A
T
I
O
N
fORD CD'
BODY TYPE MODEL CYLS DATE FIRST SO
L
D
C
L
A
S
S
*
Y
R
02/2 9/77,,i3 TrK 'HP
OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE
DO NOT CARRY IN VEHICLE
AX
DATE ISSUED . t
04/29%77
Iw
-0 4 713 CL
TAB NUMBER : 'TOTAL FEES
EXMT, NFEE
MONTESELL
1600 E361 ERLY ,13 L
MO_NTE,DELLP6A ,9,06 4 0
E
•
SIGNATURE (S) RELEASES INTEREST IN fitHICLE
IDATE) • UPON SALE. SELLER MUST SUBMIT NOTICEOF
T
R
A
N
S
F
E
R
(
R
E
C
1
3
8
)
Th
0
E
•
-
S1GNATUREIS) RELEASES INTEREST IN VEHICL
E
DATE
SUB
TOTAL
TOTAL
3951584
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: February 14, 1990
SUBJ: Tract 21564-10
Tract 21564-1, through Tract 21564-9, (except 21564-4) were all recorded using
property as security for public improvements. Tentative Tract 21564-10 is now ready
to record. All plans and maps have been reviewed for applicable state and local
regulations by the Staff and Engineer and found to be in substantial conformance.
The developer has requested to again use a lien contract as security. Staff has
reviewed the request and property appraisals and determined there is sufficient value
remaining on the undeveloped property to grant the request.
Staff, therefore, recommends the following:
1. Authorize the Mayor to execute the record map and Subdivision
Agreement.
2. Release the previous lien contracts on the property.
3. Authorize the Mayor to execute a new substitute lien contract covering
Tract 21564-1, through 21564-10 (except 21564-4).
For your information, Tentative Tract 21564-4 has not yet been processed, at the
owners request.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM
RICE -YOU nJC.. PACIFIC, INC.
BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT
163 E. MAIN STREET • SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA 92383
TELEPHONE (714) 654-4454
February 13, 1990
Bryan McNabb
c/o The City of San Jacinto
201 East Main Street
San Jacinto, C. 92383
RE: Agenda items for the 20th of February, 1990
Dear Bryan,
Attached are the Lien Contract and the Subdivision
Agreement for Tract 21564-10.
The value as colateral for the Lien Contract is as follows:
1. Land value of the remaining lots in phases 11 and 12 as denoted
on the appraisal on file in the City office.
45 lots at $13,500.00 per lot = $ 607,500.00
2. Appreciated value per the attached actual
cost of improvements spread sheets
21564-11
•
$ 270,460.17
21564-12 $ 108,450.75
TOTAL SECURITY = $ 986,410.92
Total Amount as shown by Lien Contract
$ 862,308.72
Total Lien Colateral
•
$ 986,410.92
Excess security above lien contract
•
$ 124,102.20
Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to 'call.
21564-11
FSIT11
Page 1
13/90
Date Num Payee Memo Pmt/Dep C Balance
0.00
-3,200.00 -3,200.00
/17/89
/17/89
/15/89
/18/89
/20/89
/20/89
/ 1/89
/ 3/89
/ 3/89
/ 3/89
/15/89
/30/89
/30/89
/30/89
/ 4/89
/15/89
/15/89
/31/89
/31/89
/15/90
1154
1173
1156
1182
1191
1231
1242
1251
1270
1501
1516
1519
1520
1526
1531
1532
1546
1550
1558
Balance Forward
NBS
RICHARD ALFORD
CITY OF SAN JACINT
INLAND FOUNDATIONS
NBS/LOWRY
INLAND FOUNDATIONS
N B S LOWRY
INLAND FOUNDATIONS
B S LOWRY
genesis &GLADDING
NBS
GENESIS AND ALCORN
GENESIS
EASTERN MUNICIPAL
GENESIS & INLAND C
GENESIS
LHMWD
NBS
INLAND FOUNDATION
-109,773.10
-324.05
-344.00
-4,692.00
-1,451.25
-12,710.98
-344.00
-4,872.07
-7,371.52
-3,168.89
-450.00
-3,233.78
-64,960.00
-5,323.80
-30,423.28
-16,578.50
-591.20
-647.75
-112973.10
-113297.15
-113641.15
-118333.15
-119734.40
-132495.38
-132839.38
-137711.45
-145082.97
-148251.86
-148701.86
-151935.64
-216895.64
-222219.44
-252642.72
-269221.22
-269812.42
-270460.17
21564-12
FTSIT12 Page 1
/13/90
Date Num Payee Memo Pmt/Dep C Balance
1130
1155
1157
1174
1156
1183
1192
1215
1218
1230
1245
1269
1519
1520
1521
1527
1528
1546
1550
1558
3/17/89
3/17/89
3/17/89
3/22/89
3/15/89
3/18/89
3/20/89
3/20/89
)/17/89
)/17/89
/ 1/89
/ 3/89
7 3/89
/30/89
/30/89
/30/89
1/ 4/89
1/15/89
1/31/89
1/31/89
/15/90
Balance Forward
LHMWD -12
NBS -12
DE BROS -12
RICHARD ALFORD -12
CITY OF SAN JACINT -12
INLAND FOUNDATIONS -12
NBS/LOWRY -12
RANDY JOHNSON -12
RICHARD ALFOR AND -12
INLAND FOUNDATION -12
N B S LOWRY -12
N B S LOWRY
GENESIS & ALCORN F -12
GENESIS -17
INLAND FOUNDATION -12
EASTERN MUNICIPAL 6057-12
NBS -12
LHMWD -12
NBS -12
INLAND FOUNDATION -12
X 0.00
-1,120.00 -1,120.00
-1,300.00 -2,420.00
-32.10 -2,452.10
-15,438.45 -17,890.55
-324.05 -18,214.60
-64.50 -18,279.10
-2,552.00 -20,831.10
-745.20 -21,576.30
-26,639.35 -48,215.65
-1,279.25 -49,494.90
-8,143.94 -57,638.84
-2,246.29 -59,885.13
-450.00 -60,335.13
-3,233.78 -63,568.91
-421.75 -63,990.66
-26,390.00 -90,380.66
-1,063.71 -91,444.37
-16,578.50 -108022.87
-401.63 -108424.50
-26.25 -108450.75
Rai nguard 1 EA @ 250.00 EA
Extend -4-'-Laterals -to 5 —Of -BO -175:00-E*
TOTAL SEWER
250.00
, 1 7
L4v5S -6-9-5e7ao
$50,453.00
1-14 (503 ,°4'
and on the rev,'" side fher/.2191
/
)
Owner
e Da1e
pvd
By
5
Genesis Construction
By
GENE__ IS CONSTRUCTION
General Engineering Contractor
P.O. Box 7067 — Hemet, CA 92343
(714) 652-6977
To: Rice-Young Pacific, Inc.
hereinafter called Owner
163 E. Main St,
Street
San Jacinto, CA 92383
City
Attn: Jerry Rice
Genesis Construction, a duly licensed California corporation (license
#
5
0
2
4
0
4
)
h
e
r
e
i
n
a
f
t
e
r
c
a
l
l
e
d
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
,
a
g
r
e
e
s
t
o
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
n
a
g
o
o
d
and workmanlike manner for Owner, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein and on the reverse side here
o
f
,
f
u
r
n
i
s
h
i
n
g
a
l
l
l
a
b
o
r
,
material, tools and equipment therefore, the work as noted herein for the unit prices as set forth below:
DATE 9-18-89
TITLE Park Hill Collection
ENGINEER NBS
APPROVED BY LHMWD 9-13-89
Tract #21564-9 - Sewer:
1579 LF @ $ 13.50 LF
7 EA @ 1,350.00 EA
916 LF @ 11.00 LF
Extend 4" Laterals to 5 of Building 30 EA @ 175.00 EA
TOTAL SEWER
Tract #21564-10 - Sewer:
8" Sewer Main
48" Standard Manholes
Sewer Laterals
$21,316.50
9,450.00
10,076.00
5,250,00
$46,092.50
8 1_1__$_ewer Main 1488 LF @ 13.50 LF $20,088,00
48" Standard Manholes 8 EA @ l350.00 EA 10,800.00
13,365.00
4" Sewer Laterals
1215 LF @ 11.00 LF
on the following described real property: Lots 1-105 Tract 21564-9-10-11-4
In City of San Jacinto County of Riverside , State of California.
Owner agrees to pay to the Contractor for said work listed above
t
h
e
s
u
m
o
f
$
.
Page 1 of 2
unit prices to prevail Contractor will submit nvoices to Owner on the 1 stand 15th of each month after commenceme
n
t
o
f
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
all work done by Contractor to date of invoce Owner shall pay 95% of the sums presented on each invoice on or be
f
o
r
e
t
h
e
1
0
t
h
a
n
d
2
5
t
h
o
f
eacn month following presentment of invotce The retained balance of the contract shall be paid to Contractor on presentation to Owner of
waiver or preliminary letter of acceptance cy appropriate County or City authorities, or if none. at such time as the improvement is used by
Owner or his agents, representatives or successors in interest, or within 30 days after completion of work by Contractor,
w
h
i
c
h
e
v
e
r
I
s
s
o
o
n
e
r
.
ACCEPTANCE
You are hereby authorized to furnish and install the above equip
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
materials at the prjce and under the ter ,s and conditions as set fo
r
t
h
a
b
o
v
e
ALFORD & PUYEAR INC
GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR
LICENSE NO. 583821
617 EAST MAIN STREET
SAN JACINTO, CA 92383
714-654-5629
JANUARY 15, 1990
PROPOSAL TO: RICE YOUNG PACIFIC INC
163 EAST MAIN ST.
SAN JACINTO, CA 92383
HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS OWNER
RICHARD M. ALFORD, proposes to furnish all supervision, labor,
equipment, and materials to construct and complete in a good,
substantial and workmanlike manner upon the following described
real property he items below:
TRACT NO. 21564-10
JOB NAME:PARKHILL COLLECTION
PROJECT ADDRESS: 'SAN JACINTO, CA 92383 TR. 21564-10
PROPOSAL
ITEM
NO ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY
5. CUT CURB GRADE 3269
6. BACK FILL CURB 3506
7. CUT SIDEWALK GRADE
19725
8. CONSTRUCT TYPE "A"
CURB/GUTTER . 2713
9. CONSTRUCT TYPE "B"
CURB/GUTTER 556
10. CONSTRUCT CURB ONLY
237
UNITS
L/F
L/F
L/F
L/F
L/F
ITEM
PRICE TOTAL
1.00 3,269.00
.75 2,629.50
.35 6,903.75
6.60 17,905.80
6.80 3,780.80
5.50 1,303.50
11 CONSTRUCT 25' RAD SPANDREL
INCLUDDING CUTTING GRADE
AND PLACING BASE 6
12. CONSTRUCT CROSS GUTTERS
960
13. FINE GRADE AND COMPACT
SUB GRADE 60151
14. PLACE & COMPACE CLASS
BASE (.50 THICK) 60151
EA
1200.00 7,200.00
S/F
2.85 2,736.00
S/F .13 7,819.63
S/F .34 20,451.34
ALFORD & PUYEAR INC
GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR
LICENSE NO. 583821
617 EAST MAIN STREET
SAN JACINTO, CA 92383
714-654-5629
ITEM
ITEM
NO ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY
UNITS
PRICE
TOTAL
15. PLACE & COMPACT A.C.
PAVING (.25 THICK)8391
S/F .49 28,611.59
16. FOG SEAL A.C. PAVING
58,391 S/F 1 1460.00 1,460. 0 0
TOTAL PROPOSAL 104,070.91
SECURITY AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
( LIEN CONTRACT )
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 20th day of February 1990
by and between the City of San Jacinto of the State of California
(hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Parkland Associates, L.P.,
a California Limited Partnership, (hereinafter referred to as
"Owner"), and First American Trust Company as Trustee under Trust
Number 82013600 (hereinafter referred to as "Holder").
WHEREAS, Owner has recorded tract maps 21564-1, 21564-2,
21564-3, 21564-5, 21564-6, 21564-7, 21564-8, 21564-9 and applied
to City for approval of a final map designated as Tentative Map
21564-10 pursuant to the Subdivision Ordinance of San Jacinto,
Ordinance No. 673: and;
WHEREAS, certain improvements on property require to be
dedicated to City have been required by City to be constructed
by Owner as a condition of City's approval of said final map; and
WHEREAS, Owner proposes to enter into an agreement with City
to provide City with security that such improvements will be
constructed in accordance with the Subdivision Agreement.
WHEREAS, THE SECURITY PROPOSED by Owner is that described
under the provisions of Government Code Section 66499 (a) (5)
and the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of San Jacinto,
Ordinance No. 673, Section 18-VI-14.
WHEREAS, said security shall be an interest in real property
PAGE ONE
outside of Tract 21564-1 thru 3, and 21564-5 thru 10 and shall be
secured via "Lien Contract".
WHEREAS, Owner desires City with satisfactory assurance that
Owner will be precluded from selling any property that is subject
to said Lien Contract, by Owner's conveyance of record title to
the property to Holder, as hereinafter provided; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 66499 and
Section 18-VI-14 of the City Subdivision Ordinance, the City
Council of City, has required the Owner to execute an agreement
providing for the construction of said improvements as stated
in the Subdivision Agreement of Tract 21564-1 thru 3 and 21564-5
thru 10 and for the granting of a lien to City upon said property
described in Exhibit "A" to secure the cost of the Construction of
said improvements; and
WHEREAS, Owner is agreeable to the execution of such an
agreement; and for the limited purpose as hereinafter provided
Holder is agreeable to holding title to the property;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by and between the parties hereto
as follows:
ONE: Owner has recorded with the City Clerk and the County
Recorder, an Owner's Deed, conveying Owner's record title of the
property to First American Trust Company, as "Holder", pursuant to
the terms of the Holding Agreement to be entered by and Between
Owner and Holder, and approved by City.
TWO: Holder agrees to hold title to the Property pursuant
to the terms and provisions of said Holding Agreement, from the
PAGE TWO
date of execution of the Lien Contract until receipt by Holder of
release executed by City, clearing record title of the property so
released of the lien herein imposed. Upon the receipt of said
executed release, Holder agrees to reconvey title to the property
to Owner.
THREE: Owner and Holder agree that the deed from Owner to
Holder has been recorded by the County Recorder, County of
Riverside, State of California.
FOUR: City Agrees to accept the dedications of the streets
within Tract 21564-10 for public streets upon the completion of
the improvements required herein to the satisfaction of the
Director of Public Works.
FIVE: Owner, in lieu of making the improvements specified
herein prior to the approval of its final map, agrees, covenants
and promises that it will install or construct, or cause to be
installed or constructed, the improvements herein within the time
period set forth in the Subdivision Agreement for Tract 21564-10.
Said improvements shall be made without cost or expense to
City. City estimates that, at the time of the signing of this
contract, the cost of construction of the street improvements,
drainage improvements, water system, and sewage system, including
a 10% contingency is $287,147.82 as pertaining to 21564-10 and a
retention of $50,000.00 as pertaining to 21564-1, a retention of
$10,000.00 as pertaining to 21564-2, a retention of $10,000.00
PAGE THREE
as pertaining to 21564-3, and a retention of $10,000.00 as
pertaining to tract 21564-5, and a retention of $10,000.00 as
pertaining to tract 21564-6, and a retention of $10,000.00 as
pertaining to 21564-7, and a security of $210,335.20 as pertaining
to 21564-8, and a security of $244,825.70 as pertaining to 21564-
9. Owner hereby acknowledges that these are reasonable
estimates of construction costs at this time and that the actual
cost of said improvements at some time in the future may exceed
these estimates. Owner hereby agrees that its obligation under
this agreement extends to the actual cost of construction of said
improvements, notwithstanding that it may exceed such estimates,
and the deposits in the amount then required by City.
SIX: For the faithful performance of the promises and
covenants herein contained, Owner hereby grants to City a lien upon
the property herein described as Exhibit "A", as security in the
amount of for the following:
TOTAL AMOUNT OF SECURITY
21564-1 1. Retention for performance,
labor and warranty of:
21564-2 1. Retention for warranty of:
21564-3 1. Retention for warranty of:
21564-5 1. Retention for warranty of:
21564-6 1. Retention for warranty of:
21564-7 1. Retention for warranty of:
21564-8 1. Retention for warranty of:
$ 50,000.00
$ 10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
PAGE FOUR
2. Payment to contractors, his
subcontractors, and to persons
furnishing labor or material
$ 210,335.20
21564-9
21564-10
1. Street and drainage improvements
water system, and sewage system
a. Cost of Improvements $ 122,412.85
b. Payments to contractor, his
subcontractors, and to persons
furnishing labor or material $ 122,412.85
1. Street and drainage improvements
water system, and sewage system
a. Cost of Improvements $ 148,573.91
b. Payments to contractor, his
suncontractors, and to persons
furnishing labor of material $ 148,573.91
TOTAL AMOUNT SECURITY $ 862,308.72
The cumulative amount of security, and retention, for this lien
contract is the sum of 21564-1 thru 3, and 21564-5 thru 10, TOTAL
AMOUNT OF SECURITY, WHICH IS: $ 862,308.72.
In the event the Owner, its successors, heirs, assigns or
transferees other than Holder, fails to install and construct
said improvements in the manner and within the time specified in
the Subdivision Agreement for Tracts 21564-1 thru 3 and 21564-5
thru 10. Owner agrees that City may do any or all of the following:
a. Install and construct all of a portion of said
improvements by contract or otherwise, and Owner grants permission
to the City or its employees to enter upon any portion or portions
of the property reasonably necessary for said construction, and the
entire cost and expense of said improvements shall be a lien
PAGE FIVE
against property described in Exhibit "A". Said cost and
expense shall be payable by said Owner, it successors, heirs
assigns or assignees, other than Holder, Immediately upon
completion of said improvements. In the event it is not paid
within thirty (30) days from said completion, City may foreclose
said lien by appropriate action in court of as provided by law
for the foreclosure of mortgages under power of sale pursuant
to California Civil Code Section 2924, 2924b, and 2924c. In
the event the foreclosure is by action in Court, the Owner agrees
that the amount of said lien shall include reasonable attorney
fees which shall be taxed as a cost in any suit for such
foreclosure.
b. Direct the Director of Public Works to estimate the cost
of the work required to complete said improvements, and foreclose
said lien in said amount.
c. Foreclose said lien as a mortgage.
d. Pursue any other remedy, whether legal or equitable,
provided by law of the foreclosure of a lien, and Owner, its
transferees or assigns, other than Holder, shall pay reasonable
attorney fees to be taxed as a cost in said proceedings.
SEVEN: Upon the happening of any one of the following
events, Owner shall be deemed in default hereunder. All
references to Owner hereunder shall be deemed to include references
to Owner's successors, assignees and transferees other than Holder.
PAGE SIX
a. In the event the Owner fails to install and construct
the improvements referred to under paragraph SIX, in the manner and
within the time specified herein; or
b. In the event Owner fails to before pay for the same
become delinquent, or for a period of six (6) months thereafter,
all taxes and assessments of whatever kind of nature which may be
imposed upon the real property described in Exhibit "A" during the
term hereof, provided however that in the event any such tax or
assessment which become due and payable during, and the delinquency
date for which falls within, the terms of the Agreement, or any
extension hereof, which tax or assessment may be legally paid in
installments, Owner shall have the option to pay such tax or
assessment in installments. In the Event of such election, Owner
shall be obligated to pay only those installments of such tax or
assessment which become due and payable during, and the delinquency
date for which falls within, the term of this agreement of any
extension hereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing Owner shall have
the right to dispute in good faith the legality or amount of any
tax or assessment by appropriate legal proceedings provided Owner
shall pay such tax or assessment promptly upon a final
determination of the legality or amount thereof, and shall furnish
the Riverside County Assessor on demand, such bond or other
security as the Assessor may require in the amount not exceeding
PAGE SEVEN
one and one-half times the total amount of the tax or assessment
in dispute
c. In the event any proceedings are filed or action taken by
or against Owner to declare Owner bankrupt or to appoint a
receiver or to make an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or
to do anything else of a similar nature of purpose under any state
or federal bankruptcy or insolvency laws, and if such proceedings
or actions are not discharged within six (60) days ; or
d. In the event any attachment or execution is levied
against Owner and the real property described herein, whereby said
real property is taken or occupied, or attempted to be taken or
occupied, by someone other than owner, and such attachment or
execution is not released within sixty (60) days.
In any of the above listed events, City may declare a breach
of the Agreement by written notice to Owner, and may at City's
option, exercise any one or more of the rights granted under
paragraph SIX above.
EIGHT: From the date of recordation of the Lien Contract a
lien shall attach to the real property described herein and shall
have the priority of a senior lien, securing the obligations of
Owner hereunder. This Lien Contract may be subordinated to other
liens or encumbrances if the security for performance is
sufficiently secured by a lien on other property, or the
subordination will not jeopardize the completion of the agreed upon
PAGE EIGHT
improvements specified in the Agreement Subdivision
Improvements. Any such subordination must first be approved by the
City Council of City and the proceeds or other consideration
secured by such other lien or encumbrance must be used exclusively
to construct the public improvements required for tract 21564-9
AND 10.
NINE: At any time during the period herein provide, Owner,
its heirs, successors, assigns or transferees, other than Holder,
may substitute a bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized
corporate sureties, or cash deposit, or an instrument of credit and
agreement satisfactory to City to charge said surety with the cost
of said improvements. The amount of the substituted improvement
security shall be for one hundred per cent (100%) of the cost of
the improvements as estimated at the time of substitution by the
Director of Public Works. Upon execution of said bond or bonds,
cash deposit or instrument of credit and agreement, City agrees to
release the property, or any portion of it under single ownership,
from the provisions of this Agreement, and to execute any necessary
release to enable Owner or its transferee to clear the record of
title of the property so released of the lien herein imposed.
TEN: A description of the property referred to herein
upon which said lien is impose, is set forth in the attached
Exhibit "A".
PAGE NINE
resident
, Inc.
ration as
WITNESS my hely:1-9d official seal.
Signature
ELEVEN: Previous lien Contracts for tracts 21564-1, 21564-2
21564-3, 21564-5, 21564-6, 21564-7, 21564-8 and 21564-9 are hereby
released and terminated and this agreement hereby supercedes,
substitutes and replaces these previous agreements.
I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Is&
COUNTY OF Riverside 1
February 13, 1990 On , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for
Gerald H. Rice said State, personally appeared and
Gary L. Young personally known to me (or proved to me on the
basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the persons who executed the within instrument as
Rice —Young
President and Secretary, on behalf of
Pacific, Inc.
the corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that said
corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its by-
laws or a resolution of its board of directors, said corporation being
Parkland Associate known to me to be the general partner of
L.P.
the limited partnership that executed the within instrument, and
acknowledged to me that such corpOration executed the same as
such partner and that such partnership executed the same.
OFF &i
IJUJAN HARTi.:7Ar,3
ittrAny Puatic-C.ALIFOMA
PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Corninissio Expires Arm 29, 1990
L.P.
artnership
(This area for official notarial seal)
CITY:
City of San Jacinto of the State
of California
DATE: BY:
Mayor
DATE: ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
HOLDER
First American Trust Company
a California Corporation
DATE: BY:
PAGE TEN
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 20th day of February
1990, by and between Parkland Associates,L.P. a California Limited
Partnership, the parties of the first part, hereinafter designated
and called "contractor" and the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, a Municipal
Corporation of the County of Riverside, State of California, acting
by and through Trammell Ford, as Mayor and Helen Sherman as Deputy
City Clerk, thereunto authorized so to act, the party of the second
part, hereinafter designated and called "Council".
WITNESSETH
THAT, WHEREAS, said contractor has presented to the City Council
of the City of San Jacinto, to wit: Tract 21564-10, a copy of which
said proposed map is attached to this agreement and is hereby
referred to and made a part of this agreement for any and all
particulars, and has requested the said City Council to accept the
dedication of the street or streets delineated and shown on said
map as and for a public street and highway, or streets and
highways, and to otherwise approve said map to the end that said
map be recorded as required by law, with the acceptance being
subject to and contingent upon the final inspection of the public
works by the public works inspector; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto requires as
a condition precedent to the acceptance and approval of said map
the dedication of such streets, highways and public ways as
delineated and shown on said map and deems the same as necessary
for the public use; that any street or streets delineated and shown
on said map may be improved by the construction thereon and
installation therein of grading, paving, curbs, gutters,
sidewalks, storm drains, sanitary sewers and appurtenances thereto,
street name signs, survey monuments, and water pipes and mains, and
appurtenances thereto, together with fire hydrants.
AND, WHEREAS, the improvements of said street or streets, highway
or highways as shown and delineated on said map as by the City
Council of the City of San Jacinto requires and deemed as necessary
for the public use has not been done or completed and said
contractor shall as provided by Ordinance No. 673 of the City of
San Jacinto, and by an Act of the Legislature of the State of
California, entitled, "An Act relating to the real estate
subdivisions and the making and recording of maps, and granting
limited powers to cities and towns, and counties, in connection
therewith, making certain acts misdemeanors, prescribing penalties
therefore, and repealing acts or portions of acts in conflict
herewith", enter into this Agreement with the City,
whereby on consideration of the acceptance of the offers of
dedication by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, the
Contractor agrees to complete the work hereinafter in this
agreement mentioned and set forth in detail to be done by
contractor within the time hereinafter mentioned.-
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the
acceptance of the offers of dedication of street and streets shown
and delineated on said map and the approval of said map for filing
and recording as provided and required by law, it is mutually
agreed and understood by and between Contractor and Council do
hereby mutually agree as follows:
1. That the City Council of the City of San Jacinto has fixed
and does hereby fix the time within which contractor is to do and
perform the work and improvements hereinafter stated and specified
as being the period of time to expire between the date of this
agreement and the 20th day of February 1991, and that contractor
will, at his sole cost and expense, including all costs of
inspection or inspections done by the City of San Jacinto within
the period of time hereinabove in Paragraph 1 of this agreement
stated and fixed, do or cause to be done and performed the
following described work and/or improvements to wit: All offsite
improvements as shown on Approved Improvements Plans for Tract
21564-10.
It is expressly agreed and understood by contractor the City
shall inspect all said work to be done by an inspector employed by
the City at the cost and expense of contractor and the contractor
will pay unto the City on demand the actual cost of such
inspection.
2. All of the said work and improvements and the material
therefore shall be done, preformed and installed in strict
accordance with plans and specifications therefore on file which
are adopted and made a part of this agreement.
3. Contractor shall at the time of the execution of this
agreement present to and file with the City of San Jacinto security
in the form of a lien contract on property valued at a minimum of
$148,573.91 (One hundred forty eight thousand five hundred seventy
three dollars and 91/100) of which is the sum hereby agreed is the
sum fixed by the City of San Jacinto for that purpose, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 11612 of the Business and
Professional Code and Section 66499 et. seg. of the Government
Code, conditioned upon the faithful performance by contractor of
the agreement and by its terms made to inure the benefit of the
City of San Jacinto, and contractor shall also at the time present
to and file with the City of San Jacinto good and sufficient
security valued at a minimum of $148,573.91 (One hundred forty
eight thousand five hundred seventy three dollars and 91/100) of
which and by its terms made to inure to the benefit of laborers and
material suppliers upon such work improvements conditioned upon the
payment of such laborers and material suppliers for the labor or
material performed or rendered under the terms of said contract,
and for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with
respect to such work or labor as provided by State Law.
4. Contractor shall before commencing any work as herein
provided for, take out and at all times maintain during the course
of such work, workmens compensation insurance required by the laws
of the State of California, and failing to do so, City may procure
such insurance for said contractor and contractor shall pay City
such monies as the City may be compelled to pay therefore.
5. Contractor shall save the City Council, City of San
Jacinto, and the officers and employees of said City of San
Jacinto, harmless against injuries to persons and damage to
property, which may occur by reasons or in connection with any work
done as provided and contemplated by this agreement and contractor
shall procure and carry at all times during the course of said work
liability insurance therefore in the amount of one million dollars
($1,000,000.00) in favor of contractor and City Council, City of
San Jacinto, and the officers and employees of the City of San
Jacinto as long as any work is being done as provided by this
agreement.
DATED:
2
DATED:
Parkland Associates, L.P. a
California Limited Partnership
BY: Rice-Young Pacific Inc. as
AV le
Ge al P r-
BY:
Trammell Ford, Mayor
BY:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, contractor, as parties of the first part, have
hereunto set their hands and the City Council has caused these
present to be executed in the name of the City Council of the City
of San Jacinto, by its officers thereunto duly authorized on the
day and year in this agrement first above written.
Attest:
BY:
Helen Sherman, Deputy City Clerk
STAFF REPORT
771
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: February 26, 1990
SUBJ: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 3 -89
APPLICANT: City Initiated
DESCRIPTION
A proposal to review and amend as necessary Article 6, the R-2 zone
and Article 7, the R-3 zone as they related to uses, height,
setbacks, density, open space, and site development requirements,
as well as any other issues pertinent to development in the R-2
and R-3 zones.
DISCUSSION
In October of 1989 a Multi-family Housing Committee was formed to
review and amend, as necessary, Articles 6 and 7 of the Zoning
Ordinance 340 as related to uses, height, setbacks, density, open
space and site development requirements, and other issues pertinent
to the development in the R-2 and R-3 zones.
At the first meeting, the Committee was given copies of the multi-
family design standards adopted by the City of Fairfield in
California and the City of Tucson in Arizona.
Also, the Committee discussed the concerns the City Council and
the Planning Commission and the ways the Committee could address
these problems.
At the second meeting, a preliminary concept of what the Committee
wanted in the multi-family ordinance was reached.
A draft ordinance was put together and reviewed by the Committee
at its third meeting.
The forth and last meeting was held and the Committee endorsed the
Multi-family Residential General Development Standards as presented
to you in Exhibits "A".
Also, the Committee is recommending the R-2, multifamily
residential to be designated as a zone for two residential units
only.
ZONING ORDINANCE 3-89 03-06-90 PAGE 1
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt Ordinance
897 amending Article 6, Section 606 and Article 7 of Ordinance 340
as shown in Exhibits "A" and "B".
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
ZONING ORDINANCE 3-89 03-06-90 PAGE 2
EXHIBIT "A"
ARTICLE 6
601 HEIGHT
The maximum building height shall be two stories or 30 feet,
which ever is lesser.
606 LOT AREA
The minimum lot area shall be not less than 7200 square feet.
ZONING ORDINANCE 3-89 03-06-90 PAGE 3
EXHIBIT "B"
ARTICLE 7 R-3 ZONE - MULTIPLE FAMILY ZONE
700. PURPOSE
The R-3 Zone is intended to provide locations for multiple
family residential projects at densities designated in the
City's General Plan for High Density Residential. Properties
assigned this designation should be located within close
proximity to community services such as shopping centers,
transit systems, sewers, and other required infrastructure.
701. PERMITTED USES
Any use permitted in R-1 and R-2 Zones when they comply
with all requirements of Articles 5 and 6 of this
ordinance, respectively.
2. Multiple dwellings.
3. Group houses - court apartments..
4. Boarding and lodging houses.
5. Hotels.
6. Churches in accordance with Article 18A.
7. Public parking area when developed as required in Article
15.
702. USES SUBJECT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The following uses shall require a Use Permit pursuant to
Article 17.
1. Mobilehome parks.
2. Private non-commercial clubs and lodges.
3. Commercial day care centers.
703. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR LOTS CREATED AFTER MARCH 31, 1990
A. The minimum net lot area shall be 10,000 square feet.
B. The minimum street frontage width shall be 75 feet.
C. Setbacks
ZONING ORDINANCE 3-89 03-06-90 PAGE 4
1. Front Yard
a. Adjacent to secondary or major highway.
1) Thirty (30) feet landscaped setback.
b. Adjacent to collector or local streets.
1) Twenty (20) feet landscaped setback.
c. Carports, enclosed parking structures and open
parking spaces shall not encroach into the
front yard setback.
2. Side Yard
a. A side yard of not less than five (5) feet
shall be maintained from any portion of a first
floor dwelling unit and twenty-five (25) feet
from any portion of a second floor dwelling
unit.
b. Carports and parking stalls shall maintain a
ten (10) foot side yard setback.
c. Garages may be located less than three (3) feet
from the side property line when said
structures are constructed of one (1) hour fire
resistant materials.
3. Street Side Yard
a. Adjacent to secondary or major highway.
1) Thirty (30) feet landscaped setback.
b. Adjacent to collector or local streets.
1) Twenty (20) feet landscaped setback.
c. Carports, enclosed parking structures and open
parking spaces shall not encroach into the
street side yard setback.
4. Rear Yard
a. There shall be a rear yard on each lot
extending across the full width of the lot,
said rear yard to have a depth of not less than
twenty (20) feet from any portion of a single
floor dwelling unit and twenty-five (25) feet
ZONING ORDINANCE 3-89 03-06-90 PAGE 5
from any portion of a second floor dwelling
unit.
b. Carports and open parking stalls shall maintain
a ten (10) foot rear setback.
c. Enclosed parking structures may be located may
be located less than three (3) feet from the
rear property line when said structures are
constructed of one (1) hour fire resistant
materials.
D. Building Orientation and Type
1. Distance between buildings.
Number of dwelling
units per building
one to eight
nine to twelve
thirteen to sixteen
Distance between
buildings
twenty (20) feet.
twenty-five (25)
feet.
thirty (30) feet.
(The setback requirement for the larger of two
buildings shall take precedent)
2. Building setback distance from active recreational
facilities shall be the same as the distance between
buildings in Section III, A above.
3. Apartment units shall be placed to minimize visual
intrusion into adjacent apartment unit or buildings.
Landscaping and elevations or other methods approved
by the Planning Department may be used to reduce
visual intrusion.
4. The maximum number of dwelling units per building
shall be 16.
5. Number of apartment types allowed.
a. Studio or efficiency units
1) Maximum 10% of the total units.
b. One bedroom units
1 )
Maximum 10% or maximum 20% if no studio
ZONING ORDINANCE 3-89 03-06-90 PAGE 6
or efficiency apartments are proposed.
c. Two or more bedrooms
1) Minimum 80%
E. Parking Requirements
1. Notwithstanding Article 15 of this Ordinance, there
shall be required two (2) parking spaces per
dwelling unit, of which 80% shall be covered or
enclosed.
a. Parking spaces and aisles shall have the
following minimum clear dimensions.
1) Covered and uncovered
2) Enclosed parking
3) Aisles
a. 90 degree parking
b. 60 degree parking
- 10' by 20'
- 12' by 20'
25'
20'
c. 45 degree parking - 20'
2. Parking shall be so located to be within convenient
walking distances to the dwelling units which they
are assigned to maximize the security of the
residents.
3. Enclosed parking structures shall be required to
have a one (1) hour fire resistant wall, from slab
floor to roof line for every assigned tenant space.
F. Recreational Amenities
1. A minimum of ten (10) per cent of the net lot area
shall be used for active recreational purposes.
a. Multi-family developments with area
requirements less than 5000 square feet shall
have the active recreational site centrally
located.
b. Multi-family developments with area
requirements more than 5000 square feet may
have more than one active recreational sites
throughout the development. The active
ZONING ORDINANCE 3-89 03-06-90 PAGE 7
recreational site shall have a minimum of 5000
square feet. Areas less than 5000 square feet
shall be approved by the Planning Commission
or City Council.
c. Rear and side yard setbacks may be incorporated
within the active recreational area.
d. Unusually shaped active recreational areas
shall be approved by the Planning Commission
or City Council.
2. Active recreational amenities shall be required in
all projects and may include one or more of the
following facilities as may be determined by the
Planning Commission or City Council.
Recreation building(s).
Tennis courts.
Children's play area.
Basketball courts.
Volleyball courts.
Swimming pools.
Badminton courts.
Handball courts.
Any active recreational facility approved by
the Planning Commission or City Council.
G. Exterior Storage Area
1. A minimum of eighty (80) cubic feet of storage space
shall be provided within close proximity to the
dwelling unit. If a garage is provided, the
required exterior storage area may be eliminated.
H. Fence Requirements
1. Decorative six (6) foot high combination ornamental
iron and brick or masonry fencing shall be required
along all street setback frontages.
2. Decorative six (6) foot high masonry wall shall be
constructed around the development adjacent to
private property.
I. Minimum Dwelling Unit Size
1. Single family dwelling units shall have a minimum
of 1000 square feet of living area.
2. Duplexes shall have not less than 800 square feet
ZONING ORDINANCE 3-89 03-06-90 PAGE 8
of living area per dwelling unit.
3. Multiple dwelling units shall have the following
minimum living area:
a. Efficiency units
b. One bedroom
c. Two bedrooms
d. Three bedrooms
550 square feet
750 square feet
- 900 square feet
- 1000 square feet
704. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR LOTS CREATED BEFORE MARCH 31, 1990
AND LESS THAN 10,000 SQUARE FEET
A. Maximum height
1. One (1) story or twenty feet.
2. Two (2) story or thirty (30) feet from finished
grade, as approved by the Planning Commission.
B. Setback
1. Front yard
a. Twenty-five (25) feet for landscape purposes.
2. Side yard
a. A side yard of not less than five (5) feet
shall be maintained from any portion of a first
floor dwelling unit and twenty-five (25) feet
from any portion of a second story dwelling
unit.
3. Street side
a. Fifteen (15) feet.
4. Rear yard
a. A rear yard of not less than fifteen (15) feet
shall be maintained from any portion of a first,
floor dwelling unit and twenty (25) feet from
any portion of a second floor dwelling unit.
C. Parking Requirements
ZONING ORDINANCE 3-89 03-06-90 PAGE 9
ORDINANCE NO. 897
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE 340, THE ZONING
2
ORDINANCE, RELATED USES, HEIGHT, SETBACKS, OPEN SPACE,
AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS IN THE R-2 AND R-3
3
ZONES.
4 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
5
6
7
8
9
10
Section 1.
Section 2.
Ordinance No. 340, the Land Use Ordinance of the
City of San Jacinto, is hereby amended as follows:
A. Article 6, Section 606, per attached Exhibit
B. Article 7, per attached Exhibit "B".
This Ordinance will take effect thirty (30) days
from the passage thereof.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this ordinance and cause the same to be published
in a newspaper of general circulation printed and
published in the County of Riverside, State of
California.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 6th
day of March, 1990.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the said City
Council on the day of , 1990 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
22 Mayor
23
Deputy City Clerk
24
25 CERTIFICATE
26 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO
27 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of
Ordinance No. 898, duly adopted by the City Council of the City
28 of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of , 1990.
29
Witness my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto
30 this day of , 1990
31
Deputy City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A"
ARTICLE 6
601 HEIGHT
The maximum building height shall be two stories or 30 feet,
which ever is lesser.
606 LOT AREA -
The minimum lot area shall be not less than 7200 square feet.
EXHIBIT "B"
ARTICLE 7 R-3 ZONE - MULTIPLE FAMILY ZONE
700. PURPOSE
The R-3 Zone is intended to provide locations for multiple
family residential projects at densities designated in the
City's General Plan for High Density Residential. Properties
assigned this designation should be located within close
proximity to community services such as shopping centers, _
transit systems, sewers, and other required infrastructure. -
701. PERMITTED USES
1. Any use permitted in R-1 and R-2 Zones when they comply
with all requirements of Articles 5 and 6 of this
ordinance, respectively.
2. Multiple dwellings.
3. Group houses - court apartments..
4. Boarding and lodging houses.
5. Hotels.
6. Churches in accordance with Article 18A.
7. Public parking area when developed as required in Article
15.
702. USES SUBJECT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The following uses shall require a Use Permit pursuant to
Article 17.
1. Mobilehome parks.
2. Private non-commercial clubs and lodges.
3. Commercial day care centers.
703. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR LOTS CREATED AFTER MARCH 31, 1990
A. The minimum net lot area shall be 10,000 square feet.
B. The minimum street frontage width shall be 75 feet.
C. Setbacks
1. Front Yard
a. Adjacent to secondary or major highway.
1) Thirty (30) feet landscaped setback.
b. Adjacent to collector or local streets.
1) Twenty (20) feet landscaped setback.
c. Carports, enclosed parking structures and open
parking spaces shall not encroach into the
front yard setback.
2. Side Yard
a. A side yard of not less than five (5) feet
shall be maintained from any portion of a first
floor dwelling unit and twenty-five (25) feet
from any portion of a second floor dwelling
unit.
b. Carports and parking stalls shall maintain a
ten (10) foot side yard setback.
c. Garages may be located less than three (3) feet
from the side property line when said
structures are constructed of one (1) hour fire
resistant materials.
3. Street Side Yard
a. Adjacent to secondary or major highway.
1) Thirty (30) feet landscaped setback.
b. Adjacent to collector or local streets.
1) Twenty (20) feet landscaped setback.
c. Carports, enclosed parking structures and open
parking spaces shall not encroach into the
street side yard setback.
4. Rear Yard
a. There shall be a rear yard on each lot
extending across the full width of the lot,
said rear yard to have a depth of not less than
twenty (20) feet from any portion of a single
floor dwelling unit and twenty-five (25) feet
from any portion of a second floor dwelling
unit.
b. Carports and open parking stalls shall maintain
a ten (10) foot rear setback.
c. Enclosed parking structures may be located may
be located less than three (3) feet from the
rear property line when said structures are
constructed of one (1) hour fire resistant
materials.
D. Building Orientation and Type
1. Distance between buildings.
Number of dwelling
units per building
one to eight
nine to twelve
thirteen to sixteen
Distance between
buildings
twenty (20) feet.
twenty-five (25)
feet.
thirty (30) feet.
(The setback requirement for the larger of two
buildings shall take precedent)
2. Building setback distance from active recreational
facilities shall be the same as the distance between
buildings in Section III, A above.
3. Apartment units shall be placed to minimize visual
intrusion into adjacent apartment unit or buildings.
Landscaping and elevations or other methods approved
by the Planning Department may be used to reduce
visual intrusion.
4. The maximum number of dwelling units per building
shall be 16.
5. Number of apartment types allowed.
a. Studio or efficiency units
1) Maximum 10% of the total units.
b. One bedroom units
1) Maximum 10% or maximum 20% if no studio
or efficiency apartments are proposed.
c. Two or more bedrooms
1) Minimum 80%
E. Parking Requirements
1. Notwithstanding Article 15 of this Ordinance, there
shall be required two (2) parking spaces per
dwelling unit, of which 80% shall be covered or
enclosed.
a. Parking spaces and aisles shall have the
following minimum clear dimensions.
1) Covered and uncovered - 10' by 20'
2) Enclosed parking - 12' by 20'
3) Aisles
a. 90 degree parking - 25'
b. 60 degree parking - 20'
C. 45 degree parking - 20'
2. Parking shall be so located to be within convenient
walking distances to the dwelling units which they
are assigned to maximize the security of the
residents.
3. Enclosed parking structures shall be required to
have a one (1) hour fire resistant wall, from slab
floor to roof line for every assigned tenant space.
F. Recreational Amenities
1. A minimum of ten (10) per cent of the net lot area
shall be used for active recreational purposes.
a. Multi-family developments with area
requirements less than 5000 square feet shall
have the active recreational site centrally
located.
b. Multi-family developments with area
requirements more than 5000 square feet may
have more than one active recreational sites
throughout the development. The active
recreational site shall have a minimum of 5000
square feet. Areas less than 5000 square feet
shall be approved by the Planning Commission
or City Council.
c. Rear and side yard setbacks may be incorporated
within the active recreational area.
d. Unusually shaped active recreational areas
shall be approved by the Planning Commission
or City Council.
2. Active recreational amenities shall be required in
all projects and may include one or more of the
following facilities as may be determined by the
Planning Commission or City Council.
Recreation building(s).
Tennis courts.
Children's play area.
Basketball courts.
Volleyball courts.
Swimming pools.
Badminton courts.
Handball courts.
Any active recreational facility approved by
the Planning Commission or City Council.
G. Exterior Storage Area
1. A minimum of eighty (80) cubic feet of storage space
shall be provided within close proximity to the
dwelling unit. If a garage is provided, the
required exterior storage area may be eliminated.
H. Fence Requirements
1. Decorative six (6) foot high combination ornamental
iron and brick or masonry fencing shall be required
along all street setback frontages.
2. Decorative six (6) foot high masonry wall shall be
constructed around the development adjacent to
private property.
I. Minimum Dwelling Unit Size
1. Single family dwelling units shall have a minimum
of 1000 square feet of living area.
2. Duplexes shall have not less than 800 square feet
of living area per dwelling unit.
3. Multiple dwelling units shall have the following
minimum living area:
a. Efficiency units
b. One bedroom
c. Two bedrooms
d. Three bedrooms
- 550 square feet
- 750 square feet
- 900 square feet
- 1000 square feet
704. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR LOTS CREATED BEFORE MARCH 31, 1990
AND LESS THAN 10,000 SQUARE FEET
A. Maximum height
1. One (1) story or twenty feet.
2. Two (2) story or thirty (30) feet from finished
grade, as approved by the Planning Commission.
B. Setback
1. Front yard
a. Twenty-five (25) feet for landscape purposes.
2. Side yard
a. A side yard of not less than five (5) feet
shall be maintained from any portion of a first
floor dwelling unit and twenty-five (25) feet
from any portion of a second story dwelling
unit.
3. Street side
a. Fifteen (15) feet.
4. Rear yard
a. A rear yard of not less than fifteen (15) feet
shall be maintained from any portion of a first
floor dwelling unit and twenty (25) feet from
any portion of a second floor dwelling unit.
C. Parking Requirements
1. Notwithstanding Article 15 of this Ordinance, the
following parking shall be required.
a. Studio units - one enclosed and one open
space.
b. One bedroom
- one enclosed and one open
space.
c. Two bedroom
- one enclosed and one open
space.
d. Three bedroom - two enclosed spaces.
2. A clear minimum 12' by 20' enclosed parking
dimension shall be maintained.
D. Fencing
1. A six (6) foot decorative masonry wall shall be
required along the side and rear property lines.
E. Dwelling unit size
1. The dwelling unit size shall be the same as set
forth in Section 703, I.
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: February 26,1990
SUBJ: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 3-90
Applicant: City of San Jacinto
DESCRIPTION
A proposal to amend Article 15, Section 15.03, 30(a) of Ordinance
340 related to parking for single family homes.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
This proposal will have no significant effect on the environment.
DISCUSSION
The proposal is amend Article 15, Section 15.03, 30(a) of
Ordinance 340 which reads as follows:
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
Two (2) spaces for up to three (3) sleeping rooms and three
(3) spaces for more than (3) sleeping rooms (including
family rooms, dens, etc.). All parking shall be in a
garage.
As the current sections reads, a two car garage would be required
for a two bedroom and living room home, and a three car garage if
a den was added.
This proposal would change Section 15.03, 30(a) to read:
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
Two (2) enclosed spaces for up to five (5) sleeping rooms
and three (3) enclosed spaces for more than five (5)
sleeping rooms. A sleeping room shall be defined as any
habitable room 70 square feet or larger and not used for the
preparation of food or dining.
ZOA 3-90 March 6, 1990 PAGE 1
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt
Ordinance 898 adopting Zoning Ordinance Amendment 3-90 amending
Section 15.03, 30(a) of the City's Zoning Ordinance.
Brian McNabb
Director of Community Development
ZOA 3-90 March 6, 1990 PAGE 2
ORDINANCE NO. 898
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE 340, THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, RELATED TO PARKING FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Ordinance No. 340, the Land Use Ordinance of the
City of San Jacinto, is hereby amended as follows:
A. Article 15, Sections 15.03, 30(a) per Exhibit
"A", attached.
Section 2. This Ordinance will take effect thirty (30) days
from the passage thereof.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this ordinance and cause the same to be published
in a newspaper of general circulation printed and
published in the County of Riverside, State of
California.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 6th
day of March, 1990.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the said City
Council on the day of , 1990 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Mayor
Deputy City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of
Ordinance No. 898, duly adopted by the City Council of the City
of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of , 1990.
Witness my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto
this day of , 1990
Deputy City Clerk
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
EXHIBIT "A"
Article 15, Section 15.03, 30
(a) SINGLE FAMILY HOMES
Two (2) enclosed spaces for up to five (5) sleeping rooms
and three (3) enclosed spaces for more than five (5)
sleeping rooms. A sleeping room shall be defined as any
habitable room 70 square feet or larger and not used for the
preparation of food or dining.
1. Notwithstanding Article 15 of this Ordinance, the
following parking shall be required.
a. Studio units - one enclosed and one open
space.
b. One bedroom
- one enclosed and one open
space.
c. Two bedroom
- one enclosed and one open
space.
d. Three bedroom - two enclosed spaces.
2. A clear minimum 12' by 20' enclosed parking
dimension shall be maintained.
D. Fencing
1. A six (6) foot decorative masonry wall shall be
required along the side and rear property lines.
E. Dwelling unit size
1. The dwelling unit size shall be the same as set
forth in Section 703, I.
ZONING ORDINANCE 3-89 03-06-90 PAGE 10
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Counci
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
February 26, 1990
SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 4-90
APPLICANT: City Initiated
DESCRIPTION
A proposal to amend Article 5, Section 505, of Zoning Ordinance
340 related to rear yard setbacks for single family homes.
DISCUSSION
The Planning Director approached the Planning Commission at the
regular meeting of January for direction related to the rear yard
setback in the single family zone. The Planning Commission
directed staff to research the issues and return with a proposal.
Staff contacted other local planning departments for regulations
regarding setback related to patio structures in their respective
localities. Enclosed for your review is a brief list of those
zoning requirements.
Staff has review this information and formulated a reasonable
proposal as a requirement on rear yards. The proposed amendment
is included below.
505. REAR YARDS
1. There shall be a rear yard on each lot extending across the
full width of the lot, said rear yard to have a depth of not
less than twenty (20) feet for residential occupancies.
Garages, swimming pools and non residential accessory
buildings (excluding patio structures) may be permitted in a
required rear yard area, excepting substructure of swimming
pools shall be 1 ocated not less than five (5) feet from any
property line.
2. A garage or accessory building may be located on the rear
property line when said building is constructed of one (1)
hour fire resistent materials; and, when a provision is made
for all roof drainage to be taken care of on the subject
property; and, where there are no openings on the side of the
building that is on the rear property line.
BrianNcNabb
Director of Community Development
3. Patio structures which are open on three sides may be
permitted not less than 10' from the rear property line.
Patio structures which encroach upon the rear yard setback my
not be enclosed. Open lattice patio structures may be located
not less than five (5) feet from the rear property line.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt Ordinance
899 incoporating Zoning Ordinance Amendment 4-90 into the City's
Zoning Ordinance.
Respectfully Submitted,
OTHER LOCAL GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS
PERRIS Requires a 25' minimum rear setback, however, patio
covers are treated as "separate structures". With an
"Encroachment Setback Permit" a patio would be allowed
up to 5' of the property line. The permit must be
processed through Staff Review and requires letters from
all affected property owners.
BANNING Requires a 20' minimum rear setback with no allowance
for buildings (including patios) to encroach on that
setback.
BEAUMONT Requires a 15' minimum setback - it is not clear whether
patios could encroach upon the setback.
HEMET' Requires a 15' minimum rear setback with no encroachment
of patio structures. A 10' minimum is allowed for old
lots which fall under prior regulations.
RIVERSIDE Various distinct zones exist in Riverside from 7,000
sq.ft. minimum to 1/2 acre minimum lot requirements,
however if the patio is open on three sides it may be
constructed up to 5' of the property line.
INDIO Maintain two separate rear yard setbacks of 15' for 6,000
sq.ft. lots and 20' for larger lots and allows for patio
structures open on two sides to be constructed up to 5'
of the property line.
LAKE
ELSINORE A distinction of structures is made and a setback is
determined on the type and size of the structure. A
portion of the ordinance is included for your review.
ORDINANCE NO. 899
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE 340, THE ZONING
2
ORDINANCE, RELATED TO REAR YARD SETBACKS FOR SINGLE
FAMILY HOMES.
3
411 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
II FOLLOWS:
Ordinance No. 340, the Land Use Ordinance of the
City of San Jacinto, is hereby amended as follows:
A. Article 5, Sections 505 per Exhibit "A",
attached.
This Ordinance will take effect thirty (30) days
from the passage thereof.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this ordinance and cause the same to be published
in a newspaper of general circulation printed and
published in the County of Riverside, State of
California.
5
Section 1.
611
7
Section 2.
9
10 Section 3.
11
12
13 INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 6th
day of March, 1990.
14
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the said City
15 Council on the day of , 1990 by the following
vote:
16
AYES:
17 NOES:
ABSENT:
18
19 ATTEST:
20
2
22 Deputy City Clerk
23
Mayor
CERTIFICATE
24
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO
25
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of
26 Ordinance No. 899, duly adopted by the City Council of the City
of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of 27 , 1990.
28 Witness my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto
this day of , 1990
29
30
31 Deputy City Clerk
32
EXHIBIT "A"
ARTICLE 5
505. REAR YARDS
1. There shall be a rear yard on each lot extending across the
full width of the lot, said rear yard to have a depth of not
less than twenty (20) feet for residential occupancies.
Garages, swimming pools and non residential accessory
buildings (excluding patio structures) may be permitted in a
required rear yard area, excepting substructure of swimming
pools shall be 1 ocated not less than five (5) feet from any
property line.
2. A garage or accessory building may be located on the rear
property line when said building is constructed of one (1)
hour fire resistent materials; and, when a provision is made
for all roof drainage to be taken care of on the subject
property; and, where there are no openings on the side of the
building that is on the rear property line.
3. Patio structures which are open on three sides may be
permitted not less than 10' from the rear property line.
Patio structures which encroach upon the rear yard setback my
not be enclosed. Open lattice patio structures may be located
not less than five (5) feet from the rear property line.
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: February 20, 1990
SUBJ: Ordinance 877, The Fencing Ordinance
The City Council held a hearing several months ago on the proposed fence
regulations. The hearing was closed; modifications to fence heights and materials for
commercial and industrial properties were made; and, the matter was sent back to the
Planning Commission for them to work on applicability to existing developed lots.
Staff solicited input from the Fence Committee prior to taking it back to the Planning
Commission. The Fence Committee unanimously recommended the Ordinance be left
as is.
The Planning Commission heard this at its meeting on February 14th. It unanimously
recommended the City Council adopt the proposed Fencing Regulations in their
current format.
Respectfully,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:lr
ORDINANCE NO. 877
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
2
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE 340, THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, RELATED TO FENCING AND RENUMBERING SEVERAL
3
ARTICLES AT SAID ORDINANCE.
4 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
5 FOLLOWS:
Sectio n 1. Ordinance No.the Land Use Ordinance of the
City of San Jacinto, is hereby amended as follows:
6
14
7
8
9
10
11
12
Section 2.
13
15
16
17
18
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the said City
19 Council on the day of 1990 by the following vote:
20
21 NOES:
ABSENT:
22
23 ATTEST:
24
25
26 Deputy City Clerk
27
CERTIFICATE 28
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO
29
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of
30 Ordinance No. 877, duly adopted by the City Council of the City
of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of 1 , 1990.
32
Witness my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto
this day of , 1990
Deputy City Clerk
A. Article 23, Sections 23.65 and 23.66 are
repealed.
5
B. Articles 18A, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23 are
renumbered to Articles 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, and 2
respectfully.
C. Article 19 is established in accordance with
Exhibit "A", attached.
Section 3.
d
This Ordinance will take effect thirty (30) days
from the passage thereof.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this ordinance and cause the same to be publishe
in a newspaper of general circulation printed and
published in the County of Riverside, State of
California.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 6th
day of March, 1990.
AYES:
Mayor
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS
1. PURPOSE
The purpose of these fencing and hedge regulations is to
create standards governing location and materials, and review
procedures which will clarify the regulations and achieve
consistency within the context of the neighborhood and the entire
City. The objective is to protect and reconcile the often
conflicting goals of aesthetics, privacy, security, view sight
lines and drainage.
2. APPLICABILITY
These regulations apply to all fencing installed in the
City after the effective date of this Ordinance and all existing
fencing which is replaced, whether voluntarily or due to lack of
maintenance or poor construction. Regulations regarding hedges
apply retroactively to all lots in the City.
For the purposes of this ordinance, a fence shall be
defined as a structure more than 18" in height, the purpose of
which is to either partially or totally define property boundaries
or create or define portions of yards, or secure or private areas.
3. REVIEW PROCEDURE
A building permit shall be required for all fencing
allowed under these regulations. Prior to the issuance of a
building permit, it shall be the responsibility of the Community
Development Department to review fencing plans for compliance with
these regulations.
4. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
4.1 SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL USES
This section shall pertain to lots that contain not more
than two (2) dwelling units, which are not covered under Section
4.6 and 4.7.
4.1.1 PERMITTED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as prohibited by subsection 4.1.3, fencing shall
be allowed along the front setback line, any side lot line, the
rear lot line, and any area within the yard created by the lot
lines and setback line described in this subsection.
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 1
4.1.2 REQUIRED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as prohibited by subsection 4.1.3 below, fencing
is required on newly developed lots, at all front setback lines,
street side property lines, rear property lines abutting a street,
and around rear yards. For the purposes of this subsection, the
word "street" shall include public and private streets, publicly
maintained alleys, and driveways serving flag lots, provided said
driveway serves at least two lots and is at least 20 feet wide.
Fencing shall also be required between the uses listed
in section 4.1 and other uses listed in the subsection beginning
with 4.2.
If a property owner feels extenuating circumstances
related to a view or a hillside lot exist, which make this required
fencing undesirable, the property owner may appeal in accordance
with the procedures set forth in Section 4.1.3.
Slopes are generally discouraged. Where possible, a
retaining wall of up to 6' in height shall be constructed to
eliminate a slope. Where a property line corresponds to the top
of a slope, fencing shall be installed at the top of the slope.
City staff is authorized and directed to allow higher than 6' of
retaining where extenuating circumstances exist.
4.1.3 PROHIBITED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as herein provided in this subsection, fencing is
prohibited between the front setback line and the street,between
the street side lot line and the street, and between the rear lot
line and an adjacent street. However, should the distance between
the street side lot line or the rear lot line and their respective
adjacent sidewalk is less than four feet, the fence may be placed
against the rear of the sidewalk if an encroachment permit is first
obtained.
Where fencing is installed between the street side
property line and the street side setback line, said fence shall
not extend any closer than 30 feet to the front property line.
Fencing that creates a safety problem because it
substantially blocks visibility of vehicles or pedestrians is
prohibited.
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 2
If a property owner feels extenuating circumstances exist
which warrant the placement of a fence in a prohibited location,
said property owner may petition in writing the Director of
Community Development for approval, describing what these
circumstances are. The Director shall review the request, verify
in the field the accuracy of the circumstances, and either approve
or deny the request. If the request is denied, the matter may be
appealed to the Planning Commission and can be further appealed to
the City Council. The Council's decision shall be final.
Normally, an exemption shall only be granted for fencing along side
lot lines. However, where fencing on more than 50% of the lots on
the same side of the street in a block containing fencing in a
prohibited location, the Community Development Director shall allow
conformance with existing fencing.
Special consideration shall be given to historic homes.
4.1.4 MATERIALS
Where fencing is required by subsection 4.1.2, and is
facing a street, fencing materials shall be wrought iron type,
masonry, concrete, brick, or an acceptable equivalent or a
combination thereof, excepting that between differing land uses
fencing materials shall be masonry. Gates in this required fencing
shall be wrought iron type, chain link, or a material acceptable
to the Community Development Department.
All other permitted fencing may be of any other durable
material but shall not include barbed wire, razor wire or any other
similar fencing or fencing that contains an electrical charge that
can be touched from outside the fence.
Where a constant fencing type or theme exists in a
housing development, fencing that is replaced shall be consistent
with the existing fencing.
Where wood fencing is proposed, the support posts shall
be galvanized steel, set in concrete.
Fencing approved by the Department of Community
Development in the area normally prohibited from containing a fence
shall be of a material specified in the first paragraph of this
subsection. However, where fencing on more than 50% of the lots
on the same side of the street in a block contain non conforming
materials, the Community Development Director shall also allow
fencing of a type existing in that block except types listed in the
second paragraph.
Historic homes shall also be given special consideration.
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 3
4.1.5 HEIGHT OF FENCING
Required fencing shall be no less than five (5) feet in
height and no more than (6) feet, as measured from the highest
adjacent grade. All other permitted fencing shall be no more than
six (6) feet in height. If a special need exists for a fence
higher than six (6) feet (ie a tennis court), then a variance may
be applied for from the Planning Commission.
Where fencing has been approved in an area where it is
normally prohibited by these regulations, said fencing shall not
exceed 42" in height measured from the adjacent top of curb.
When a reverse corner lot situation exists, fencing
along the street side shall not exceed 42" unless said fence is
set back a minimum of 15 feet from the side lot line.
For the purpose of this subsection and all other
following sections, the required height shall be met on both sides
of the wall.
4.1.6 HEDGES
Hedges are permitted on all portions of a lot. Where
fences are prohibited, hedges shall be no higher than 42" above
the top of the adjacent curb. The maximum height of a hedge
anywhere else on a lot is eight (8) feet.
4.2 MULTIPLE FAMILY
This section shall pertain to lots that contain more than
two (2) dwelling units.
4.2.1 PERMITTED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as prohibited by subsection 4.2.3, fencing shall
be allowed along the front setback line, any side lot line, the
rear lot line, and any area within the yard created by the lot
lines and setback line described in this subsection.
4.2.2 REQUIRED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as prohibited by subsection 4.2.3 below, fencing
is required on newly developed lots, at all front setback lines,
street side property lines, rear property lines abutting a street,
and around rear yards. For the purposes of this subsection, the
word "street" shall include public and private streets, publicly
maintained alleys, and driveways serving flag lots, provided said
driveway serves at least two lots and is at least 20 feet wide.
Fencing is not required at the front setback line as it intersects
a driveway to a parking lot.
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 4
Fencing shall also be required between the uses listed
in section 4.1 and other uses listed below beginning with
subsection 4.3 and the uses to which this section pertains.
Slopes are generally discouraged. Where possible, a
retaining wall of up to 6' in height shall be constructed to
eliminate a slope. Where a property line corresponds to the top
of a slope, fencing shall be installed at the top of the slope.
City staff is authorized and directed to allow higher than 6' of
retaining where extenuating circumstances exist.
4.2.3 PROHIBITED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as herein provided in this subsection, fencing is
prohibited between the front setback line and the street,between
the street side lot line and the street, and between the rear lot
line and an adjacent street. However, should the distance between
the street side lot line or the rear lot line and their respective
adjacent sidewalk is less than four feet, the fence may be placed
against the rear of the sidewalk if an encroachment permit is first
obtained.
Where fencing is installed between the street side
property line and the street side setback line, said fence shall
not extend any closer than 30 feet to the front property line.
Fencing that creates a safety problem because it
substantially blocks visibility of vehicles or pedestrians is
prohibited.
If a property owner feels extenuating circumstances exist
which warrant the placement of a fence in a prohibited location,
said property owner may petition in writing the Director of
Community Development for approval, describing what these
circumstances are. The Director shall review the request, verify
in the field the accuracy of the circumstances, and either approve
or deny the request. If the request is denied, the matter may be
appealed to the Planning Commission and can be further appealed to
the City Council. The Council's decision shall be final.
Normally, an exemption shall only be granted for fencing along side
lot lines.
4.2.4 MATERIALS
Where fencing is required by subsection 4.2.2, and is
visible from the street, fencing materials shall be wrought iron
type, masonry, concrete, brick, or an acceptable equivalent or a
combination thereof, excepting that between uses, fencing materials
shall be masonry. Gates in this required fencing shall be wrought
iron type, chain link, or a material acceptable to the Community
Development Director.
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 5
All other permitted fencing may be of any other durable
material but shall not include barbed wire, razor wire or any other
similar fencing or fencing that contains an electrical charge that
can be touched from outside the fence.
Where wood fencing is proposed, the support posts shall
be galvanized steel, set in concrete.
Fencing approved by the Director of Community Development
or the City Council in the area normally prohibited from containing
a fence shall be of a material specified in the first paragraph of
this subsection.
4.2.5 HEIGHT OF FENCING
Required fencing shall be no less than five (5) feet in
height and no more than (6) feet. All other permitted fencing
shall be no more than six (6) feet in height. All fence heights
shall be measured from the highest adjacent grade.
Where the Director of Community Development or the City
Council has approved fencing in an area where it is normally
prohibited by these regulations, said fencing shall not exceed 42"
in height measured from the adjacent top of curb.
When a reverse corner lot situation exists, fencing
along the street side shall not exceed 42" unless said fence is
set back a minimum of 15 feet from the side lot line.
4.2.6 HEDGES
Hedges are permitted on all portions of a lot. Where
fences are prohibited, hedges shall be no higher than 42" above
the top of the adjacent curb. The maximum height of a hedge
anywhere else on a lot is eight (8) feet.
4.3 COMMERCIAL USE
This section shall pertain to lots that contain uses
allowed in the C-1 and C-2 zones.
4.3.1 PERMITTED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as prohibited below, fencing shall only be allowed
along an interior side lot line and a rear lot line. Other fencing
may be permitted behind the front setback line upon a petition in
accordance with Section 4.1.3.
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 6
t.3.2 REQUIRED LOCATION
Except when prohibited by 4.3.3 fencing is required on
all newly developed lots along interior side lot lines and the rear
lot line.
Slopes are generally discouraged. Where possible, a
retaining wall of up to 6' in height shall be constructed to
eliminate a slope. Where a property line corresponds to the top
of a slope, fencing shall be installed at the top of the slope.
City staff is authorized and directed to allow higher than 6' of
retaining where extenuating circumstances exist.
4.3.3 PROHIBITED
Fencing is prohibited in all areas where it is not
permitted by Section 4.3.1.
4.3.4. MATERIALS
When constructed, the first six feet of perimeter fencing
which faces a street or residential area shall be solid masonry,
concrete, or similar material. All other fencing may be
constructed of masonry, wrought iron type, chain link, or an
acceptable equivalent.
Alternative fencing material may be approved by the
Planning Department, with appeal to the Planning Commission, if it
finds a need for the alternative fencing due to special security
or inventory display considerations.
4.3.5 HEIGHT
The height of fencing between commercial uses and
residential uses shall be six feet except the 20' closest to and
perpendicular to a street shall be no more than 42" high.
All other fencing for a commercial use shall not exceed
8' in height, unless the Planning Department, with appeal to the
Planning Commission for Conditional Use Permit, has approved a
higher fence for security reasons.
4.3.6 HEDGES
Hedges associated with commercial uses shall not exceed
42" in height.
4.4 INDUSTRIAL USE
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 7
4.4.1 PERMITTED LOCATION
Except as otherwise prohibited, fencing may be
allowed behind front or streetside setback lines.
4.4.2 REQUIRED LOCATION OF FENCING
Fencing is not required unless there is outside storage
of materials or an attractive nuisance on a lot.
Slopes are generally discouraged. Where possible, a
retaining wall of up to 6' in height shall be constructed to
eliminate a slope. Where a property line corresponds to the top
of a slope, fencing shall be installed at the top of the slope.
City staff is authorized and directed to allow higher than 6' of
retaining where extenuating circumstances exist.
4.4.3 PROHIBITED LOCATION
Fencing is prohibited within any setback area
4.4.4 MATERIALS
When fencing is installed, it shall be constructed of
masonry, wrought iron type, chain link, or an acceptable
equivalent.
The Community Development Director shall determine, by
the nature of the business, whether screening is necessary. Such
determination may be appealed to the Planning Commission.
4.4.5 HEIGHT OF FENCING
Fencing facing a street, shall be no more than six (6)
feet in height. Other fencing shall not exceed eight (8) feet in
height.
If a special need exists for a fence higher than that
specified above, then a variance may be applied for from the
Planning Commission.
Generally, outside storage shall not exceed the height
of the fence.
4.4.6 HEDGES
Hedges shall be considered as fences for the purposes of
this subsection.
4.5 MOB ILEHOMES
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 8
4.5.1
MOBILEHOME PARKS
Mobilehome parks shall have be separated from differing
land uses by a six (6) foot masonry wall.
Street frontages shall have a six foot combination
decorative wall and wrought iron type fencing, which shall be
approved by the Planning Commission when it considers the
Conditional Use Permit application.
4.5.2
MOBILEHOME SUBDIVISIONS
Mobilehome subdivisions or mobilehomes on a single family
lot shall meet the requirements of Section 4.1 above.
Slopes are generally discouraged. Where possible, a
retaining wall of up to 6' in height shall be constructed to
eliminate a slope. Where a property line corresponds to the top
of a slope, fencing shall be installed at the top of the slope.
City staff is authorized and directed to allow higher than 6' of
retaining where extenuating circumstances exist.
4.6
AGRICULTURAL
4.6.1
DEFINITIONS
Agricultural Use--Any use listed in the Zoning Ordinance which
permits the keeping of animals.
Small agricultural use-a use on less than one net acre.
Large agricultural use-a use on one or more net acres.
4.6.2
SMALL AGRICULTURAL USES
Land which has a small agricultural use and one or more
dwelling units shall comply with Section 4.1 above.
Slopes are generally discouraged. Where possible, a
retaining wall of up to 6' in height shall be constructed to
eliminate a slope. Where a property line corresponds to the top
of a slope, fencing shall be installed at the top of the slope.
City staff is authorized and directed to allow higher than 6' of
retaining where extenuating circumstances exist.
4.6.3
LARGE AGRICULTURAL USES
All other agricultural uses not covered by subsection
4.6.2 have no specific fencing requirements except that fencing
shall not create a traffic hazard.
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 9
4.7 OTHER USES
All other uses not previously listed in these regulations
shall have their fencing reviewed by the Planning Commission if a
public hearing is required or by the Community Development Director
if no public hearing is required.
Examples of uses not specifically mentioned herein are
Planned Unit Developments, Planned Community Developments,
recreational facilities,schools, and flood control basins.
5. NON -CONFORMITIES
Existing fencing not conforming to these regulations
shall be made to conform if said fencing is replaced for any reason
or if there is a substantial change in use, excepting that damaged
fencing may be replaced in kind if the damage is less than 50% of
the fence length.
6. MAINTENANCE
All fencing shall be maintained in a reasonably
attractive condition, free of graffiti, dry rot, etc. No fence
shall have any hazardous elements endangering the health or welfare
of any member of the public. Any fencing not maintained in
accordance with this section shall be considered a public nuisance.
The City Council shall hold a hearing to make the final
determination of a public nuisance and shall issue an order of
action to be taken. If the property owner fails to comply with
the order, the City or its agent may enter onto private property
for the purposes of eliminating the public nuisance. Any costs to
the City shall be assessed as a lien on the property.
7. PENALTY
Any person violating these regulations shall be guilty
of an infraction, punishable by a fine of $100.00 for each day of
violation. Any person violating these regulations a second time
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine
of $500.00 per day for each day of violation and/or up to thirty
(30) days in jail.
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 10
ME MO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Henry T. Garcia, Asst. City Manager
SUBJ: 2010 Committee Agenda and Foimat
DATE: 02-27-90
Pursuant to Mayor Ford's request, the attached list represents
the individuals interested in participating in the 2010
Committee, both those previously appointed and those expressing
recent interest. As of this date, the list totals 49 individuals.
In addition, the Council should be aware that Staff has met
with both Department and Division Heads to discuss the purpose
and formatting of the 2010 Committee. A summary of this
meeting is as follows:
Purpose of 2010 Committee
1. Identify the issues important to San Jacinto in the next
20 years.
2. Determine goals related to these issues.
3. Formulate specific recommendations related to these goals.
Suggested Initial Agenda
1. General introduction by Staff.
2. Brainstorm and list important issues facing San Jacinto
in the next 20 years.
3. Categorize these issues into 3-8 different groups.
4. Elect Chairman, Vice-Chairman, and recording secretary
for the 2010 Committee.
5. Create subcommittees for each of the 3-8 groups.
6. Determine whether there are enough people on the 2010
Committee.
7. Adjournment
2010 Committee Agenda and Format
pg. 2
General Functioning of 2010 Committee
Meetings - 3 Types
A. Subcommittee meetings - to meet as frequently as
necessary to accomplish their purpose.
B. Steering Committee - consisting of the Chairman of
each Subcommittee and the Chairman of the 2010 Committee.
The Steering Committee meets to be sure there is
coordination between subcommittees, communication between
subcommittees, and to be sure no subcommittee is lagging
behind.
C. General membership meetings - a meeting of all committee
members to discuss the accomplishments of the committees
as it relates to its purpose.
Committee and Subcommittee FoLmat
A. Officers - Each committee or subcommittee shall have
a chairman, a vice-chairman, and a recording secretary.
B. Liaison - Each committee or subcommittee shall have
a staff member assigned to act as liaison between the
committee and staff.
C. Responsibilities - Each committee or subcommittee is
responsible to fulfill the function assigned. This
shall include responsibilities for attaining a quorum,
recording and distributing minutes of meetings and
public relations.
Role of Staff
Staff will act as the facilitator of the first meeting.
Otherwise, at least one staff member shall be present at
each committee or subcommittee meeting to serve as the technical
person to answer questions, gather requested data and comment
in viability.
In summary, the Council should be aware that on January 31,
1990, the first meeting of the 2010 Committee was held at
the Community Center. By way of background, only nine (9)
members were in attendance. Since that meeting, Staff has
2010 Committee Agenda and Format
pg. 3
had additional inquiries from the School District and various
utility companies about participating in our 2010 planning
process.
Based upon the number of interested participants, Staff will
schedule a second meeting in the near future.
Respectfully submitted,
Henry T. Garcia
nr
attc.
2010 APPOINTED COMMITTEE MEMBERS
NAME
Baggett, Dorothy
Creelman, Peter
Jenkins, Tom
Leahy, Jan
McGill, Joan
Naginis, Bernard
Olivas, Marcelo
Olivo, Librado
Palmer, Therese
Rutledge, Bill
Redding, Lester
Schouten, John
Spitz, Harry
Stevens, R.J.
Surbeck, Norman
Sweitzer, Rex
Taylor, Glen
Thomson, Pat
ADDRESS
1446 Monroe Circle S.J.
348 E. Second St. S.J.
1422 Potomic Cr. S.J.
990 Chase St. S.J.
2230 Lake Park Dr S-247 S.J.
288 Grand Army S.J.
973 Camphor Ct. S.J.
446 W. Main St. S.J.
164 Pico St. S.J.
766 Torino Ave. S.J.
2230 Lake Park Dr S-214 S.J.
21931 Warren Rd. S.J.
859 Verona Ave. S.J.
651 S. San Jacinto Ave. S.J.
2041 Hooper Dr. S.J.
2080 Teco Dr. S.J.
2230 Lake Park Dr. S-245 S.J.
2230 Lake Park Dr S-126 S.J.
PHONE NO.
654-3803
654-3691
654-0938
654-0332
654-2684
654-2701
654-2250
654-4807
654-4475
654-3219
654-7097
654-4782
658-2261
929-9772
654-4700
654-0480
ADDITIONAL INTERESTED PARTIES
Amato, Sal
Buck, Raymond
Charland, Smith
Curran, Terri
Daday, Richard
DeSilva, Don
Dufresne, Muriel
Engleman, Steve
Goepp, Sam
Haight, Harold
Hall, Fran
Howard, Chuck
Howe, Bob
Jones, Nick
Kinack, Helen
Langerock, Dan
Ledbetter, Terry
Owens, Wayne
Quick, William
Ramos, Ricardo
Reaser, Wilma
Shaw, Ken
Stuart, Wayne
Visser, Brenda
Whitson, Judy
Poochigian, Andrew
Tibbitts, Rod
Barto, Lindsay
Miller, Glenn
1000 S. Gilbert #139
25115 Kirby Sp 421
1335 Bushy Tail Trail S.J.
2134 Wente Ct. S. J.
2048 Hooper Dr. S.J.
537 Camino Grande S. J.
19625 Highway 79 92340 GHS
349 Oleander Dr. S.J.
26170 Thacker Dr
800 W. Community College S.J.
P.O. Box 550 S.J.
P.O. Box 1350
1520 S. San Jacinto Ave S.J.
41030 Quail Rd.
583 Athol S.J.
40450 Menlo #22
S.J.
143 Santa Fe St. S. J.
722 S. San Jacinto Ave S.J.
471 E. 2nd St. S.J.
25597 Yale St.
1039 Park Ave. S.J.
2144 Villines Ave. S.J.
418 Virginia Dr. S.J.
419 W. 5th St. S.J.
188 E. Main St. S.J.
1050 Ramona Blvd S. J.
P.O. Box 905
22980 Orangewood Crt G.T.
1790 N. Carrie St. S.J.
929-0082
925-2734
654-0352
652-6221
925-6543
654-5449
654-4980
654-1735
927-1330
654-3602
652-6854
658-6849
658-8556
658-6279
654-1782
925-2302
654-4206
654-2438
929-0042
658-1239
766-1490
654-4633
654-4006
654-9246
925-7773
885-6055
654-8195
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: February 27, 1990
SUBJ: Request for Water Line Installation
Attached for your use and information is a letter of request for water service to a lot
in the County area on North San Jacinto Street from Mr. & Mrs. Tom Martinez.
As you know, the Council policy on this matter requires annexation prior to providing
service. Annexation to the City is possible, although several parcels not owned by the
Martinez's would be involved. I have attached a map for your reference.
Staff does not recommend any deviation from existing policy.
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:lr
12-7-89
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
201 E. MAIN STREET
SAN JACINTO, CA 92383
SUBJECT: WATER LINE INSTALLATION
PROPOSED: NEW WATER LINE TO SERVICE NEW RESIDENCE AT RIVERSIDE
COUNTY MAP #434-170-042,PARCEL #4.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO BUILDING DEPARTMENT, MR. B. Mc NAB, HAS
REQUESTED YOUR CONCURRENCE FOR THIS PROJECT.
WE ARE PRESENTLY IN THE PLANNING STAGES FOR BUILDING A NEW
HOME ON THE ABOVE STATED LOCATION. A FOUR INCH WATER MAIN, HY-
DRANT, WATER METER AND SERVICE MEETING S.J.W.D. CODE ARE PRO-
POSED. THESE FACILITIES ARE TO BE INSTALLED BY THE CUSTOMER,
EXTENDING FROM LOT "A" TO LOT "E". THEREAFTER, FACILITY ACCEP-
TANCE, FINAL HOOK-UP AND S.J.W.D. MAINTANENCE IS REQUESTED.
MR. & MRS. TOM MARTINEZ
342 BRINTON STREET
SAN JACINTO, CA 92383
PH 654-0447
RECEIVEL
FEB 1 1990
Community Development
.06
Proposed City Limits Annexation #64 /
BERGIN
1.11 S.4
2.07Ac
183 Ac.
2.3/ Ac. 2..5/A c.
304.4,0.
7
8
4.4
8 3 Ss 0 diNCIV SlActa
011 1 1.1 6)
u%S.•ea*
1.1o.12:
Ste
•
110 40.,E
0.•l Aej
0.ft At..=
- //
— 1.064c.
115 Ac.
•
I®
/8.46 Ac.
0
ZS/ Ac. 2.5/ Ac.
9
/0
/0
A
• Por...3
.54Ac6c
or ir
22! Ac
13
/4