HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 2/20/1990AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
THE COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
DATE: February 20, 1990
TIME:
7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Rose, Divine, Redding, Boykin, Ford
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
NOTICE TO PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine
and will be enacted by one motion by the City Council in the form
listed.
There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion
unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests
specified items to be removed and/or discussed.
Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come forward,
upon invitation of the Mayor, state their name, address, and the Consent
Calendar item number.
I .
CONSENT CALENDAR - City Manager
A. Approval of Minutes of February 6, 1990
as submitted.
(Receive and File).
B. Financial Report of Activity for the period January
1990. (Receive and File).
C. Approval of Warrants No.'s 21543 through 21667 as
submitted by the Finance Director.
D. Ordinance for Adoption - Ordinance No. 894
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto governing development in hillside areas.
E. Request from Robert Nelson, Director of Riverside
County Waste Management - A.B. 939 and Recycling,
requesting support of the County Solid Waste Manage-
ment Advisory Council and authorization for the City
Clerk to transmit a copy of the minute action to
Mr. Nelson before March 1, 1990.
(Staff recommends approval)
F. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda pursuant
to City Attorney.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by:Seconded by: Action: to approve
consent calendar items A through F as recommended by Staff,
adopt Ordinance No 894 and waive the reading in full.
Vote:
February 20, 1990
Page 2
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Tentative Tract 25636 and Variance -90
Applicant: Sunny Hills Development/Famste Investment
Location: north of Ramona Expressway, west of Eagle
Road
Request to convert an existing condominium subdivision
to a 52 lot subdivision map.
Motion by: Seconded by: Action:
Vote:
ORAL COMMUNICATION
Members of the Audience wishing to address the City Council should fill
out the appropriate form and hand it to the Deputy City Clerk prior
to the meeting. Council is prohibited by State law from taking action
on items not listed on the agenda unless of an emergency nature.
I V. CITY DEPARTMENTS
A. Community Development
(1) Building Code Ordinance
Ordinance for Adoption - Ordinance No. 893
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto regulating procedures for abating dangerous
buildings by adopting the Uniform Code for the Abate-
ment of Dangerous Buildings 1988 Edition, Uniform
Building Code 1988 Edition, Uniform Plumbing Code
1988 Edition, Uniform Housing Code 1988 Edition,
Uniform Mechanical Code 1988, Uniform Sign Code 1998
Edition, Uniform Administrative Code 1988 Edition
and repealing conflicting ordinances, and revising
fees.
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to
introduce Ordinance No. 893 to second reading and waive
the reading in full. Vote
B. City Manager's Office
(1) 16th Year COBS Allocation
Motion by: Seconded by: Action:
Vote:
(2) Civic Center Project - Phase I
Motion by: Seconded by: Action:
Vote:
February 20, 1990
Page 3
V. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/COMMENTS
A. Cooperative activities with City of Hemet.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by: Seconded by:__ Action: to adjourn Vote:
Meeting adjourned at
p • m •
Next regular City Council meeting March 6, 1
9
9
0
1E6 JAL
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Ross S. Nammar, City Manager
SUBJ: Litigation
DATE: 02-06-90
We have been keeping you posted on the progress of several
claims and lawsuits effecting the City. Evidently, Attorney
Bray of Hemet is seeing fit to litigate two (2) claims:
Silvas vs City of San Jacinto and Calderon vs City of
San Jacinto in the news media.
This is of a great concern to the administration and
legal counsel, Peter Ferguson of Ferguson, Praet & Sherman,
defense legal counsel for the City. Attorney Ferguson
and myself are requesting Council to meet in an Executive
Session at 6:30 p.m. on March 6, 1990 so we can share
with you a detailed analysis of the claims, our defense
strategy and most importantly, the amount of potential
financial exposure to the City.
Respectfully submitted,
nr
cc: City Attorney
NOT OFFIMAL UNTU
MINUTES APPROVED DY COUNCH.
San Jacinto City Council
the Council Sitting as
the Redevelopment Agency
and Industrial Development Authority
Regular Meeting )L=ILVi.41.Li
6 February 1990
The regular meeting of the San Jacinto City Council,
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
s
i
t
t
i
n
g
a
s
the Redevelopment Agency and Industrial Development A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
w
a
s
c
a
l
l
e
d
t
o
order at 7:30 p.m. by Acting Mayor Divine
Roll Call - Present: Councilman Redding, Rose and Di
v
i
n
e
Absent: Councilmen Boykin and Ford (excused absence due to il
l
n
e
s
s
)
Staff Members Present: Assistant City Manager Garcia
,
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Director McNabb, Police Chief Kozma and Deputy City
Clerk Sherman
I CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of minutes of January 16, 1990.
B. Approval of warrants No.s 21403 through 21542 in the
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
$
3
9
2
,
7
4
1
.
5
7
as submitted by the Finance Director.
Treasurer's Office Time Deposit Registers for Januar
y
1
9
9
0
.
(
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
a
n
d
f
i
l
e
.
)
D. Ordinance No. 884 for adoption; approving Planned Un
i
t
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
6
-
8
9
amending the Zoning Map of the City.
E. Acceptance of Road Deed from Agri Empire along 7th S
t
r
e
e
t
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
M
a
i
n
a
n
d
Kellam. (Staff recommends acceptance.)
F. Ordinance No. 895 for adoption; approving Change of
Z
o
n
e
2
7
-
8
9
a
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
the Zoning Map of the City.
G. Ordinance No. 896 for adoption; approving Planned Un
i
t
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
5
-
8
9
amending the Zoning Map of the City.
H. Ordinance No. 892 for adoption; establishing Lift St
a
t
i
o
n
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
#
1
,
setting its initial boundaries, projecting its ultima
t
e
b
o
u
n
d
a
r
i
e
s
a
n
d
setting the District buy-in fee and monthly service ch
a
r
g
e
s
.
Tracts 21564-7 and 21564-8. Applicant: Parkland Ass
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
.
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
:
Park Hill Collection.
a. Acceptance of Public Improvements for Tract 21564-8.
b. Release of Performance Liens for Tracts 21564-7 and
2
1
5
6
4
-
8
t
o
$
1
0
,
0
0
0
each.
c. Release of Labor and Material Lien for Tracts 21564-
7
a
n
d
2
1
5
6
4
-
8
a
t
the end of the lien period.
(Staff recommends approval.)
J. Approval of Final Parcel Map 23468. Applicant: Wil
l
i
a
m
S
i
m
p
s
o
n
.
L
o
c
a
-
tion: Idyllwild Drive across from the High School.
(
S
t
a
f
f
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
approval.)
K. Approval of Final Parcel Map 24594. Applicant: Arr
o
w
h
e
a
d
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
.
L
o
c
a
-
tion: Southwest corner of State Street and the Ramon
a
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
.
L. Award of bid for 24 inch Transmission Waterline with
i
n
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
District No. 2.
M. Authorization for the Mayor to execute contract betw
e
e
n
E
M
W
D
a
n
d
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Facilities District No. 2.
N. Claim of Laddie Leeper for automobile damages and l
o
s
t
w
a
g
e
s
.
(
S
t
a
f
f
recommends approval subject to verification of lost wa
g
e
s
.
)
O. Claims of Vincent and Rita Silvas for personal injuri
e
s
.
(
C
i
t
y
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
recommends denial of application for leave of late cla
i
m
s
.
)
P. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda pursuant t
o
C
i
t
y
A
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
.
NOT r -ICIAL UNTIL
APPRO. _J BY COUNCIL
Councilman Redding moved to approve the consent calendar with the exception of
Item I-G, which will be dealt with separately, to adopt Ordinances No.s
884, 892 and 895 and waive reading in full.
Seconded by Councilman Rose
Motion carried 3-0.
G. Ordinance No. 896 approving Planned Unit Development 5-89.
Councilman Redding stated he will not approve any more PUD lots of less
than 7,200 sq. ft.
Councilman Rose moved to adopt Ordinance No. 896 and waive reading in full.
Seconded by Councilman Divine
Motion carried 2-1. Councilman Redding voted no.
M. Dave Coddington, Peacock-Radaker representative, asked for a little more
time to study the contract between EMWD and Community Facilities District
No. 2. The document is quite lengthy, and he had just received it.
II PUBLIC HEARING
A. 16th Year Community Development Block Grant Program.
In addition to this public hearing, a public hearing was held at the Com-
munity Center January 25 for input from the public. The public hearing was
opened. The hearing was advertised; affidavit of,publication is_on file:,The
CTerk tas .receivedmo Comments -. The4ublic hearing Was openeth_Although'. in-
vited,to be heard;Ao_one Anthe audience -'spoke.:The -hearina was .closed::The
item will be brought back:to:the Council February 20 with recommendations.
Councilman Rose moved to continue this matter to February 20 for recommendations.
Seconded by Councilman Redding.
Motion carried 3-0.
III ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
A. Steve Rebovich, 975 Clover Street, wanted to know why he has not received
the letter from staff which he and several other residents of the subdivi-
sion were promised some time ago. Community Development Director McNabb
said the letters will go out this week.
B. Odas Rose, 969 Evans Street, complained regarding the condition of Evans,
water standing, mud, potholes, etc.
C. Jim Richards, VEDC Executive Director, gave the Council an update of VEDC
activities and thanked the Council for its support. The annual "Outlook
Day" is scheduled for April 12 at 9:00 a.m. at Valley-wide Recreation
and Park District facility. He also said that no decision has been made
concerning a Veterans Home site; there may be one facility or perhaps
several smaller facilities.
D. Douglas N. Gauld, 365 West 6th Street, complained about the San Jacinto
Police Department. Council members advised him that the proper procedure
is the filing of a written complaint. At that point Chief Kozma spoke
with Mr. Gauld, gave him his business card and invited Mr. Gauld to come
to his office to discuss any problems.
IV CITY DEPARTMENTS
A. Community Development
1. Building Code Ordinance No. 893 for adoption; regulating procedures
for abating dangerous buildings by adopting the Uniform Code for the
Abatement of Dangerous Buildings 1988 Edition; Uniform Building Code
1988 Edition; Uniform Plumbing Code 1988 Edition; Uniform Housing
Code 1988 Edition; Uniform Mechanical Code 1988 Edition; Uniform
6 February 1990 -2-
)T OFFICIAL UNTIL
APPROVED BY COUNCIL
Sign Code 1988 Edition; Uniform Administrative Code 1988 Edition and
repealing conflicting ordinances and revising fees.
Councilman Redding moved to continue introduction of Ordinance No. 893 to the
next meeting since two Councilmen are not present.
Seconded by Councilman Rose
Motion carried 3-0.
2. 2010 Committee Report. A subcommittee should have 5 to 8 persons on
it. Pursuant to the Maddy Act an advertisement should be placed for
more members. There should be an application formulated for recruit-
ing members; 40 to 50 people are needed. The City should produce
information to give to applicants so that prospective members will
have some idea of their duties. Educational process must be by live
presentation as well as written material. Applicants should be re-
cruited from schools, industries, Valley-wide officials, service
organizations, etc.
Councilman Redding moved to readvertise for additional members and send invita-
tions to individual businesses, organizations, etc.
Seconded by Councilmen Rose
Motion carried 3-0.
• 3. Quandt Ranch Road Petition. Daniel A. Fontes, 353 Quandt Ranch Road
presented a petition signed by 100 residents of the area requesting -
placement of stop signs to slow down traffic on Quandt Ranch Road
which is six-tenths of a mile in length. Mr. Fonte spoke of the
speeding on the street. Chief Kozma spoke on the request and pos-
sible solutions. Community Development Director McNabb stated
that staff has requested the new City Engineer to perform a traffic
study to determine what might be done to slow down traffic on the
street. The study will take approximately a month.
V MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS REPORTS/COMMENTS
A. Request from Mt. San Jacinto College Foundation: Performing/Fine Arts
for a no fee business license for "The Valley Historical Home/Art Show
and Contest" to be held at the home of Marguerite Washburn, 455 E. Main
Street on April 7, 1990. This has been approved.
. B. Councilman Redding. Re the Hillside ordinance Sections 2 and 3 particu-
- - larly Section 3, Item 5, he opposes modification of hillside lots and the
- definition of excessive -cut,and fill of hillside lots. Final comment:
questionS -the direction the -ho -Mes'WoOld be facing on the hillside.
VI EXECUTIVE SESSION
Councilman Redding moved to deny the request of Chief Kozma for an executive
session and table the executive session on the Council agenda of Feb-
ruary 6 to a meeting when all Councilmen are present.
Seconded by Councilman Rose
Motion carried 3-0.
VII Councilman Rose moved to adjourn.
Seconded by Councilman Redding
Motion carried 3-0.
Meeting adjourned at 8:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Helen Sherman
Deputy City Clerk
6 February 1990
AGEND
2,157,283
83,779
22,494
94,990
17,890
91,725
44,892
58,790
3,078
8,438
127,307
17,734
29,490
172,797
88,273
48
105,316
92,252
11,800
148,963
440,225
1,385,811
58,662
119,721
249,605
28,666
5,660,029
462,371
218,129
78 ;653
-248,572
329,782
39,424
91,235CR
28,633
100,130
26,922
309,537
199,064
30,391
1,338
203,560
- 19,783
92,508
1,639
59,264
1,107,148
154,987
219,511
18,726
367,146
363,282
24,397
35,508
208,426
5,185
11,853
683,296
50,970CR
194,367
5,781,328
(1._;'Y OF SAN JACINTO
FINANCIAL REPORT OF ACTIVITY
FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 1/31/90
UND
REVENUES EXPENDITURES
CASH
. DESCRIPTION
TO DATE TO DATE
BALANCE
GENERAL FUND 2,295,333
SEWER MAINTENANCE & DEVELOPMENT 122,878
WORKMANS COMPENSATION INSURANCE END 6,224
LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND 10,000
GAS TAX FUND 183,479
-MEASURE A - GAS TAX FUND 39,424
LOCAL TRANSPORATION FUND ART: 62,887
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 56,311
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND 86,198
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 30,000
INTEREST FUND 309,537
PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND 60,081
HCD - HUD FUND 157,698
SWIMMING POOL FUND 12,567
PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT FUND 75,775
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 01 148,141
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 42 155,782
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 03 1,687
UNDERGROUND UTILITY 50
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 313,321
ASSESSMENT DIST 87-1 21,903
WATER SURCHARGE FUND 19,126
WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 62,972
WATER FUND 583,555
TRUST ACCOUNT FUND 1,198,762
ASSETS FORFEITURE/EVIDENCE MONIES 40,339
PAYROLL FUND
SOBODA PROJECT FUND 44,239
SOBOBA DEBT SERVICE
LOW-MOD INCOME HOUSING SODOBA
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FUND 464,805
REDEVELOPMENT DEBT SERVICE FUND 4,833
LOW-MOD INCOME HOUSING S+jo PROJECT
6,567,909
ESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED+
OSS NAMMAR
ITY TREASURER
•GLCD12
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS
UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK A/C 201398
CHECK
21543*
21544*
21545*
21546*
21547*
21548*
-21549*
21550*
21551*
21552*
21553*
21554*
21555*
21556*
21557*
21558*
21559*
21560*
21561*
21562*
21563*
21564*
21565*
21566*
21567*
21568
21569
21570
21571
21572
21573
21574
21575
21576
21577
21578
21.579
21580
21581
21582
21583
21584
21.585
21586
21587
21588
21589
21590
21591
21592
21593
ISSUED TO
U.S. POSTMASTER
BLUE CROSS OF SO. CA.
HEALTH NET
HEALTH NET
STANDARD INS. COMPANY
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
HELEN SHERMAN
T•ICO EMERGENCY VEHICLE
S.J. WORKERS COMP.
AMERICAN RED CROSS
TREASURER'S PETTY CASH
PUBLIC EMP. RET. SYSTEM
PUBLIC EMI RET. SYSTEM
PUBLIC EMP. RET. SYSTEM
U.S. POSTMASTER
RAYMOND CARLSON
BILL RUTLEDGE
RICHARD HIXSON
DAVID VER PLANK
GLENN TAYLOR
LAKESIDE CHEVROLET
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
MICHAEL CASTANON
A-1 LOCK & KEY
ADLERHORST INT. INC.
ALERT BARRICADE
AL'S LAWNMOWER SHOP
AUTO BODY OF HEMET
B & W PIPE CO.
E.S. BABCOCK & SONS
BARRY BACKLUND
HECTOR BAEZ()
BARCLAYS LAW PUBL.
BEST BARRICADE
BOB'S LUMBER
BURTRONICS BUSINESS
CAACO
CALIFORNIA ANIMAL CONTR
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BOARD OF EGUALIZATION
STATE OF CALIF.
CA. PEACE OFFICERS ASSOC
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
JAMES CALKINS
COM SER CO.
CONTINENTAL AIR TOOL
CO-ORDINATED WESTERN
CREDIT BUREAU OF CORONA
DESCRIPTION
BULK MAILING-BLDG.
HEALTH INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
DEP. DISABILITY INS.
NET PAYROLL
STATE TAXES
FEDERAL TAXES
MEDICARE CONTRIBUTION
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
REPAIRS UNIT 4107-P.D.
REIMBURSE ACCOUNT
1ST AID COURSE-F.D.
REPLENISH PETTY CASH
RETIREMENT
RETIREMENT
RETIREMENT
REIMBURSE POSTAGE METER
PC MEETING
PC MEETING
PC MEETING
PC MEETING
PC MEETING
2-1990 CHEVY. P.U.
PROCESSING FEE
REIMP. FOR MEMBERSHIP
SERVICES-P.D. • CITY YARD
FOOD-FEDOR/P.D.
BARRICADES-TRAFFIC SAFETY
OIL-F.D.
REPR. RADIATOR-P.D.
REPR, IMPERIAL CLOCK
LAB TESTS
SCHOOL FEE-P.D.
REIMB. MILEAGE
PUBLICATION
BARRICADES -F.D.
SUPPLIES-ALL DEPTS.
PAPER-MICROFILM
MEMBERSHIP DUES
MEMBERSHIP DUES
UNDERGROUND STORAGE
ENVIRONMENTAL FEE
FEE FOR M/H PARKS
1990 SUBSCRIPTION-P.D.
LEGAL SOURCEBOOKS-P.D.
COMM, CENTER ADDITION
REPAIRS-P.D.
SAW BLADES-WATER DEPT.
WELDING RODS-P.W.
TRW CHECKS-P.D.
AMOUNT ,
45.66
3,890+34
13,784.39
103.94
2,911+07
86,549.17
3,071.06
14,140.24
1,147.96
520.00
125+79
2,693.53
35.00
87.83
16,868.22
17,387+47
17,086+76
925+00
60.00
60.00
60.00
60.00
60.00
22,987+06
20.00
15.00
119.78
36+08
864.68
5.00
226.00
366.07
64.00
14.50
20.02
740.00
77.16
172.93
188.74
25.nO
35.00
600.00
100.00
3,950.00
41.65
71.00
110.00
60.00
94.46
246+68
60.00
-,ITY OF SAN JACINTO
,01-CD12
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS
PAGE 2
UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK A/C 201398
DATE 2/15/90
CHECK
21594
21595
21596
21.597
21598
21599
21600
21601
21602
21.603
21604
21605
21606
21607
21608
21609
21610
21611
21612
21613
21614
21615
21616
21617
21618
21619
21620
21621
21622
21623
21.624
21625
21626
21627
21628
21629
21630
21631
21632
21633
21634
21.635
21.636
21637
21638
21639
21640
21.641
21642
21643
21644
ISSUED TO
CREST MEDICAL INCo
CURRY COPY CENTER
D & H TRUCK EQUIPMENT
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
DRIVERS LICENSE GUIDE
EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST
ENTENMANN-ROVIN CO.
EVANS TIRE CO.
FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP
STEVE FILARSKY
FIRE COMMAND
FIRE ENGINEERING
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
FONTANA PAVINGS. INC4
GTE
GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
JIM HAMZA CHRYSLER
HAYNES FIRE EXTG. SERV,
HEMET NEWS
HEMET RADIOLOGY MEDIGRO
HEMET SUPPLY CO.
HEMET VALLEY IMAGING
RANDY A. HICKS
HOT SHOTS 1 HOUR PHOTO
HUBBS STATIONERY
I.B.M. CORP.
INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT
INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT
JOHNSON TRACTOR CO.
JUAREZ AUTO UPHSTRY
KERN EQUIPT. CO.
JOSEPH Mo KOZMA
LADDIE LEEPER
LIGHTING POWDER CO.
LONGS DRUG STORE
AMETEK/MC CROMETER DIV.
MARDEN-SUSCO
MICROFLIGHT COMPUTERS
MUNICIPAL ENG.CONSLTNT.
KENSON NISHINO
NORTON BATTERY MFG. CO.
STEVE OVERTON
PACESETTER BUILDING
P.S. HARLEY-DAVIDSON
LYNN PEAVEY CO.
PRECISE LANDSCAPING
PRESS-ENTERPRISE
RACEWAY FORD
RAMONA ANIMAL HAVEN INC
RANCHO SANTIAGO COLLEGE
NANCY RANDOLPH
DESCRIPTION
PRESSURE GAUGE-F.D.
BIDDING DOC.-BLD04 DEPT.
COVER-DUMP TRUCK
CONSUMER DEPOSITS
I.D. CHECKING GUIDE-P.D.
UTILITIES
BADGES-P.D.
TIRES & REPAIRS
REPAIR VEHICLE"GREEN"-P.D.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
SUBSCRIPTION -F.D.
RENEW SUBSCRIPTION
IND. DEVLP. EDELBROCK
CLASS 2 BASE
MAINT. P.D. & C.C.
TEL* COMM.
PARTS UNIT 0416
FIRE EXT. RECHARGED-F.D.
ADVERTISING
EXAM-TIEHL
SUPPLIES
MEDICAL EXAMS
REIMBURSE TRANSPORTATION
FILM PROCESSING-P.D.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
LEASE/RENTAL
COLD MIX
REBUILT FORKLIFT
PARTS FOR UNIT 419
REPAIR UPHOLSTERY-P.D.
PARTS UNIT 0423
SEMINAR-P.D.
REPAIR VEHICLE
REFL. PALMPRINT ROLL-P.D.
SUPPLIES
WATER METERS
WTR. PIPE & SUPPLIES
PRINTER RIBBON-PLANNING DEPT.
ENGINEERING SERVICES
REIMB. PARKING/DINNE
BATTERIES -P.D.
FIRST AID CLASS-P.D.
INSPECTION SERVICES
MOTORCYCLE SERVICE
CAST PACKETS-P.D.
WEED ABATEMENT
ADVERTISING
PARTS-P.D.
ANIMALS - JANUARY
SEMINAR-F.D.
ORAL BOARD LUNCH
AMOUNT
87+37
66413
568.41
1,250.00
19.67
689.22
227.10
1,670.47
1,799.31
1,440.00
15.75
21.95
499435
186.17
629.38
1,789.64
38.86
156.85
394.23
43.60
1,043.76
55.00
34.02
313.21
897.65
174.00
169.58
8,954.45
104+19
180400
448.58
161.00
1,091.00
62.79
181.96
248443
1,655+79
13487
12,520.50
13.26
173.10
30.00
14,890.50
295.37
59.00
2.630400
298.80
784487
292+00
40.00
11.50
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
GLCD12
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS
PAGE
UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK A/C 201398
DATE 2/15/90
CHECK
21645
21646
21647
21648
21649
21650
21651
21652
21653
21654
21655
21656
21657
21658
21659
21660
21661
21662
21663
21664
21665
21666
21667
ISSUED TO
MIKE READE CHEV.,
MIKE READE NISSAN
SCTOA
SAFETY-KLEEN CORP.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
SCOTSMAN MANUFACTURING
SHAFFER PSYL. INSTITUTE
SHARP BUILDING SUPPLY
SMART & FINAL
SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON
SO. CALIFORNIA GAS CO.
SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL
SUNSHINE NURSERY
TECHNICAL PROD.CORP.
UNCLE RON'S PLUMBING
UNIVERSITY COPY SYSTEMS
REGENTS UNIV. OF CALIF*
A. VAN GOETHEN PRINTING
WELCH'S UNIFORMS
WEST PUBLISHING CO.
BOB WILSON
WINDSHIELD DOCTOR
XEROX CORPORATION
DESCRIPTION
PARTS-F.D.
POWER UNIT-P.D.
MEMBERSHIP-F.D.
SUPPLIES
UTILITY BILLS
MONTHLY LEASE
TESTING-P.D.
BUILDING SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES -P.D.
UTILITY
UTILITY
FUEL
LLMD LANDSCAPE
YIRCHEM - WATER DEPT
SNAKE OUT TOILET-F.D
EXCESS COPIES-87,88;89
SUBSCRIPTION
PAMPHLETS-P.D.
UNIFORM CLEANING
CALIFORNIA CODES
REIMBURSEMENT -MEETING
REPAIR WINDSHIELD-P.D.
MAINTENANCE-F.D.
AMOUNT .
21.62
220.80
25.00
96+55
322,77
854.00
950.00
849.33
99.48
15,635.77
2,615.64
8 215.95
927.50
3,413.15
40.00
1,424.52
132.50
667.19
912.50
303+32
16+00
35.00
540.76
FINAL TOTAL 310,725.23
MEMO -
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian Mc Nabb
SUBJ: Hillside Ordinance 894
DATE: February 14, 1990
The Hillside Ordinance is before the Planning Commission on
February 14, which will not allow staff enough time to report
back to the Council with their findings. Therefore, staff will
have this matter on the agenda on March 6, 1990.
Respectfully submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:ga
111111.• 1111•1• MOM*
MS • NOW OM NM
MO IOW MIS M11111.11111111111
MEI IFNI MN ••n•n•••••n 111011.
ow. ow. nn•n ANIM,
...PM
0111n•••
INV 0n10 MI MP Ol• i MO
y..... ..... .... ... ..... ... .... ...
111•1111111111•11111111 MINININ/M MID OM WWII 011n11•• MO
WM 411,41.111n1= m.o. am NoM ••n•nn•••n•n nnn•n•
ROBERT A. NELSON
Director AGENDA
January 8, 1990
THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Ross Nammar, City Manager
City of San Jacinto
P.O. Box 488
201 E. Main Street
San Jacinto, CA 92383
Re: AB 939, Recycling
Dear Mr. Nammar:
I am enclosing herewith two documents of relevance to
t
h
e
recently passed AS 939 Recycling Law:
1. A Regulatory Issues and Responses paper prepared by
the California Waste Management Board.
2. Resolution No. 89-636 approved by the County Board of
Supervisors on December 19, 1989 to broaden the base of
the County Solid Waste Management Advisory Council to
include greater city involvement and participation in
County Solid Waste planning activities, and to serve
the Countywide Task Force required to be established in
the new recycling law.
This letter and information is being forwarded to all
C
i
t
y
Managers in the County.
Item No. 1 includes several questions and answer
s
t
o
questions commonly raised by agencies trying to interp
r
e
t
t
h
e
n
e
w
law. I would suggest you read it and distribute copies
t
o
t
h
o
s
e
on your staff, and your City Council who must soon begin
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
for the implementation of this law in your City.
Item No. 2 requires resolutions of support or offi
c
i
a
l
minute order support of 50% of the cities within th
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
containing 50% of the population, similar to what we
r
e
c
e
n
t
l
y
requested on the final minor amendments to the County S
o
l
i
d
W
a
s
t
e
Management Plan. I would like to express my appreciatio
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
close coordination and timely responses obtained from
v
i
r
t
u
a
l
l
y
(2g414.1of the cities on that amendment. Our document was
'OgubsegLfently approved by the CWMB on December 15, 19
8
9
.
JAN ], G 1990
11728 Magnolia, Suite A • Riverside, CA 92503 • (714) 785-6081
Additionally, you may wish to know that two general
coordinating meetings relative to AB 939 re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
r
e
b
e
i
n
g
planned for the Cities and County. The te
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
d
a
t
e
s
w
h
i
c
h
have been set for these meetings are Febru
a
r
y
1
f
o
r
t
h
e
D
e
s
e
r
t
area, and February 2 for the Western River
s
i
d
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
a
r
e
a
.
I
t
is our hope that these meetings will give us a
c
h
a
n
c
e
t
o
i
n
i
t
i
a
t
e
a coordinated dialogue on waste stream
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
i
s
s
u
e
s
,
determine areas in which the County can as
s
i
s
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
avoid duplications, and answer some of the qu
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
y
o
u
m
a
y
h
a
v
e
relative to AB 939. We will advise you late
r
o
f
t
h
e
e
x
a
c
t
t
i
m
e
and place of these workshops.
We respectfully request your City's formal s
u
p
p
o
r
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
Board appointed County Solid Waste Management
A
d
v
i
s
o
r
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
b
e
returned to us by March 1, 1990. If you have
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
o
n
t
h
i
s
,
please feel free to contact Michael Schier or
M
a
u
r
e
e
n
M
a
r
s
h
a
l
l
o
f
my staff at (714) 785-6081.
Sincerely,
2-7d;„
Robert A. Nelson, Director
Department of Waste Management
RAN:mm
Enclosures
cc: Gary Cottrell, CAO
Melba Dunlap, Chairman, SWMAC
COUN IDE
INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT
Regulatoly Issues and Responses
California Waste Management Board
December 15, 1989
INTRODUCTION
The following is a compilation of issues and respo
n
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
r
a
i
s
e
d
w
i
t
h
r
e
g
a
r
d
s
t
o
t
h
e
development of the Countywide Integrated Waste Ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
T
h
e
i
s
s
u
e
s
a
n
d
responses address both general planning procedures as
w
e
l
l
a
s
t
h
e
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
adoption of emergency regulations for the City and C
o
u
n
t
y
S
o
u
r
c
e
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
which are described in Public Resources Code (PRC)
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
4
1
0
0
0
a
n
d
4
1
3
0
0
,
r
e
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
.
Part I of this document includes references to the ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
o
l
i
d
W
a
s
t
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
process and its integration with the newly required Co
u
n
t
y
w
i
d
e
I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
W
a
s
t
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
s
.
P
a
r
t
II of this document outlines the currently proposed re
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
f
r
a
m
e
w
o
r
k
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
n
d
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
o
u
r
c
e
Reduction and Recycling Element which is a maj
o
r
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
w
i
d
e
I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
W
a
s
t
e
Management Plans. An outline of the regulatory require
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
n
d
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
o
u
r
c
e
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
and Recycling Element has also been included.
Each of the issues and responses discussed in this docum
e
n
t
h
a
v
e
u
n
d
e
r
g
o
n
e
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
b
y
b
o
t
h
Board staff and the three firms under contract to th
e
B
o
a
r
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
regulations. The Board has endeavored to provide the
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
i
t
h
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
input on the issues pertaining to the development of
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
w
a
s
t
e
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
and the draft emergency regulations within the statut
o
r
y
t
i
m
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
a
i
n
t
s
.
T
h
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
i
s
s
u
e
s
presented in this document may be affected by both
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
a
n
d
o
r
a
l
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
b
o
t
h
emergency and formal regulatory adoption process.
Page I •
PART I
PLANNING PROCESS
Issue: What happens to the CoSWM
P
a
f
t
e
r
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
,
1
9
9
0
?
Response: Effective January 1, 1990
,
t
h
e
s
t
a
t
u
t
o
r
y
b
a
s
i
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
o
l
i
d
W
a
s
t
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
(CoSWMP) process (Government Co
d
e
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
6
6
7
0
0
,
e
t
.
s
e
q
.
)
c
e
a
s
e
s
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
.
T
h
e
n
e
w
P
u
b
l
i
c
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Code (PRC) language which establish
e
s
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
W
a
s
t
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
(
C
1
W
M
P
)
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
does not provide for any transition m
e
c
h
a
n
i
s
m
t
h
a
t
w
o
u
l
d
r
e
t
a
i
n
a
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
C
o
S
W
M
P
i
n
f
u
l
l
f
o
r
c
e
a
n
d
e
f
f
e
c
t
until such time as the new CIWMP c
a
k
e
s
e
f
f
e
c
t
.
Issue: What is the linkage" betwee
n
t
h
e
n
e
w
l
y
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
W
a
s
t
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
facility siting process?
Response: The new PRC law that esta
b
l
i
s
h
e
s
t
h
e
C
I
W
M
P
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
t
e
s
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
a
"
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
of conformance" with the solid wast
e
p
l
a
n
.
T
h
i
s
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
C
o
d
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
s
t
a
r
e
board make such a determination be
f
o
r
e
c
o
n
c
u
r
r
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
l
o
c
a
l
i
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
o
f
a
s
o
l
i
d
w
a
s
t
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
p
e
r
m
i
t
.
Since this is no longer required under
t
h
e
P
R
C
,
t
h
e
"
l
i
n
k
a
g
e
"
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
a
p
l
a
n
a
n
d
t
h
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
s
i
t
i
n
g
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
is weakened.
Issue: Why is the County Source R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
before the City Source
Reduction and Recycling Elements a
r
e
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
c
o
u
n
t
y
?
Response: This anomaly has been in
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
a
u
t
h
o
r
'
s
o
f
f
i
c
e
t
o
b
e
a
m
i
s
t
a
k
e
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
b
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
d
in "clean up" legislation.
Issue: What is the role of the locall
y
a
p
p
o
i
n
t
e
d
T
a
s
k
F
o
r
c
e
i
n
c
a
r
r
y
i
n
g
o
u
t
t
h
e
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
RNM plans?
Response: The task force serves at th
e
p
l
e
a
s
u
r
e
o
f
t
h
e
B
o
a
r
d
o
f
S
u
p
e
r
v
i
s
o
r
s
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e
c
o
u
n
t
y
a
n
d
the cities which comprise a major
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
o
s
e
c
o
u
n
t
i
e
s
.
T
h
o
s
e
j
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
h
a
v
e
t
h
e
authority to define the exact role of t
h
e
t
a
s
k
f
o
r
c
e
.
S
i
n
c
e
m
a
n
y
j
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
h
a
v
e
e
m
p
a
n
e
l
e
d
l
o
c
a
l
c
i
t
i
z
e
n
s
to perform similar services under cu
r
r
e
n
t
l
a
w
,
t
h
e
s
e
p
r
e
c
u
r
s
o
r
s
t
o
t
h
e
t
a
s
k
f
o
r
c
e
s
m
a
y
s
e
r
v
e
a
s
m
o
d
e
l
s
f
o
r
what the local task forces may do.
Issue: Can a City Source Reduction
a
n
d
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
b
e
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
s
t
a
t
e
b
o
a
r
d
b
e
f
o
r
e
i
t
i
s
submitted to the county for inclusio
n
i
n
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
[
W
M
p
l
a
n
?
Response: There is a contlict in the l
a
w
.
P
R
C
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
4
1
7
9
4
s
t
a
t
e
s
t
h
a
t
a
n
y
c
i
t
y
m
a
y
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
h
e
i
r
S
o
u
r
c
e
Reduction and Recycling Element to
t
h
e
b
o
a
r
d
f
o
r
review prior to the mandated schedule. T
h
i
s
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
does not authorize approval.
PRC Section 41800, however, state
s
t
h
a
t
w
i
t
h
i
n
1
2
0
d
a
y
s
o
f
r
e
c
e
i
p
t
o
f
a
n
y
C
i
t
y
S
o
u
r
c
e
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
Recycling Element or County Integra
t
e
d
W
a
s
t
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
,
t
h
e
B
o
a
r
d
s
h
a
l
l
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
r
e
i
f
t
h
e
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
or plan complies with the requireme
n
t
s
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
l
a
w
a
n
d
,
b
a
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
t
h
a
t
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
,
a
n
d
a
c
t
t
o
approve or disapprove such element or plan. These two
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
l
e
g
i
s
l
a
t
i
v
e
remedy.
Page 2
Issue: How will a permit application, submitted after
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
1
,
1
9
9
0
,
b
e
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
d
?
Response: PRC Section 44001, et. seq., specifies the proce
d
u
r
e
s
f
o
r
c
a
r
r
y
i
n
g
o
u
t
.
t
h
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
s
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
T
h
e
Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) structure is retained in t
h
e
n
e
w
l
a
w
,
a
l
o
n
g
with the substantial local
authority that LEAs exercise in the issuance of solid waste facility permits
.
A
g
a
i
n
,
i
t
i
s
n
o
t
e
w
o
r
t
h
y
t
h
a
t
issuance of the permit is not linked to any requiremen
t
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
i
n
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
b
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
CIWMP.
Issue: What role does CEQA play in development and
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
I
W
M
p
l
a
n
s
?
Response: New PRC language is silent on CEQA. This do
e
s
n
o
t
m
e
a
n
,
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
t
h
a
t
C
E
Q
A
d
o
e
s
n
o
t
a
p
p
l
y
.
The CEQA process applies to any discretionary act that m
a
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
t
h
e
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
,
r
e
g
a
r
d
l
e
s
s
o
f
t
h
e
P
R
C
or any other code. As application of CEQA will apply
t
o
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
CIWMPs, each plan or project will be required to cond
u
c
t
a
n
i
n
i
t
i
a
l
s
t
u
d
y
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
w
h
a
t
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
environmental review, if any, is required. Based on this
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
,
C
E
Q
A
w
i
l
l
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
i
e
d
w
i
t
h
.
Issue: I-low will the LEA certification program be implemented"'
Response: On or before August 1, 1991, the Board shall prepare and adopt certification regulations for
LEAs. As specified in PRC Section 43201, an LEA that does not comply with th
e
c
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
shall not exercise the authority of an enforcement agen
c
y
.
I
t
i
s
t
h
e
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
p
o
l
i
c
y
o
f
t
h
e
B
o
a
r
d
t
h
a
t
a
l
l
currently designated LEAs shall continue to exercise cur
r
e
n
t
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
u
n
t
i
l
t
h
e
s
t
a
t
u
t
o
r
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
certification takes effect.
Issue: What will happen to legal actions initiated on delinquent CoSW
M
P
s
?
Response: All legal actions against counties will be dropped as of Ja
n
u
a
r
y
1, 1990, because CoSWMPs will
no longer be required by state law.
Issue: Who will decide how much remaining capacity
i
s
available at the local level?
Response: Local determinations that are verifiable by acceptable land survey, photometric, or other
measurement practices that are attested to by a regis
t
e
r
e
d
c
i
v
i
l
e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
w
i
l
l
b
e
a
c
c
e
p
t
e
d
.
T
h
e
s
e
determinations are, of course, subject to review by state
b
o
a
r
d
s
t
a
f
f
.
Issue: Why is a "Facility Siting Element' included in Al
3
9
3
9
,
i
f
c
o
n
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
n
e
w
p
l
a
n
s
has been
eliminated?
Response: With regard to landfills, aggressive plannin
g
t
o
a
c
q
u
i
r
e
s
u
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
i
s
i
m
p
e
r
a
t
i
v
e
regardless of the level of recycling activity. Land rep
o
s
i
t
o
r
i
e
s
w
i
l
l
a
l
w
a
y
s
be part of the solid waste
management hierarchy. Additionally, there are othe
r
t
y
p
e
s
o
f
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
composting facilities, and transformation facilities that
w
i
l
l
n
e
e
d
t
o
b
e
s
i
t
e
d
.
T
o
t
h
i
s
e
x
t
e
n
t
,
t
h
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
Siting Element is a key component of an integrated plan
.
Issue: When will the new board take over the responsi
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
b
o
a
r
d
?
Response: When a quorum (4 members) have been appoi
n
t
e
d
,
t
h
e
C
W
M
B
c
e
a
s
e
s
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
a
n
d
t
h
e
C
I
W
M
B
takes over responsibility for implementing the Integrat
e
d
W
a
s
t
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
,
a
n
d
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
l
a
w
s
.
l'age 3
PART II
SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLIN
G
E
L
E
M
E
N
T
A GENERAL (GOALS AND OBJEC
T
I
V
E
S
)
Issue: What is the proposed regulatory f
o
r
m
a
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
n
d
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
o
u
r
c
e
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
Element?
Response: The draft outline of what mus
t
b
e
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
n
d
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
o
u
r
c
e
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
Recycling Element is as follows:
A. Goals and Objectives of the Element
B. Waste Stream Assessment Analysis
C. Components
• Source Reduction
• Recycling
• Composting
• Special Wastes
• Household Hazardous Waste
D. Funding
E. Marketing
F. Education and Public Information
G. Facility Capacity .Component
H. Interrelationship of Specific Components
I. Element Implementation
J. Element Monitoring and Evaluation
Issue: When will the formally approved
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
s
o
u
r
c
e
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
b
e
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
?
Response: Within 120 days of the adopti
o
n
o
f
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
n
d
C
o
u
n
t
y
'
S
o
u
r
c
e
Reduction and Recycling Element by the
B
o
a
r
d
,
f
o
r
m
a
l
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
m
u
s
t
b
e
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
the specific procedures established under
t
h
e
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
s
A
c
t
.
Issue: What 'counts" toward achieveme
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
s
t
a
t
u
t
o
r
y
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
g
o
a
l
s
o
f
2
5
%
b
y
1
9
9
5
a
n
d
5
0
%
b
y
the year 2000?
Response: While this issue continues u
n
d
e
r
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
,
P
R
C
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
4
1
7
8
1
,
(
a
)
,
(
1
)
,
s
t
a
t
e
s
t
h
a
t
f
o
r
determining the "base rate" of solid waste
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
w
h
i
c
h
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
l
e
v
e
l
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
,
t
h
a
t
only materials "normally disposed" of at a landfill or transformation facility
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
.
W
h
i
l
e
t
h
i
s
section addresses establishing a base ra
t
e
,
i
t
f
o
l
l
o
w
s
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
l
y
t
h
a
t
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
n
o
r
m
a
l
l
y
d
i
s
p
o
s
e
d
o
f
a
t
landfills and transformation facilities sh
o
u
l
d
b
e
e
l
i
g
i
b
l
e
t
o
c
o
u
n
t
t
o
w
a
r
d
s
a
t
t
a
i
n
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
a
t
g
o
a
l
.
F
o
r
example, although corrugated cardboard i
s
e
x
t
-isively recycled, any trip to a landfill will
d
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
e
t
h
a
t
cardboard is normally disposed of. Ther
e
f
o
r
e
a
n
y
c
a
r
d
b
o
a
r
d
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
w
o
u
l
d
"
c
o
u
n
t
"
t
o
w
a
r
d
s
t
h
e
g
o
a
l
.
Car bodies, on the ocher hand are not trad
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
y
d
i
s
p
o
s
e
d
o
f
a
t
l
a
n
d
f
i
l
l
s
.
T
h
e
r
e
f
o
r
e
,
c
a
r
b
o
d
i
e
s
a
r
e
n
o
t
counted towards recycling goals.
Page 4
Issue: Will 'weight' or 'volume' be the determin
a
n
t
i
n
c
a
l
c
-
u
l
a
t
i
n
g
a
m
o
u
n
t
s
o
f
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
d
i
v
e
r
t
e
d
f
r
o
m
landfills and transformation facilities?
Response: While still under consideration, it is e
v
i
d
e
n
t
t
h
a
t
u
s
e
o
f
e
i
t
h
e
r
o
n
e
e
x
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
l
y
w
i
l
l
s
e
r
v
e
t
o
t
h
e
detriment of certain commodities to be recycled. For example, if "air space" in
a
l
a
n
d
f
i
l
l
i
s
t
o
b
e
t
h
e
determinant for successful diversion, then volume
i
s
c
l
e
a
r
l
y
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
r
e
a
b
l
e
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
.
H
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
s
o
l
i
d
waste has traditionally been measured in ton
s
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
r
e
i
s
a
t
e
n
d
e
n
c
y
t
o
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
i
s
measurement. Since a cubic yard of baled newsp
r
i
n
t
a
n
d
b
a
l
e
d
H
O
P
E
p
l
a
s
t
i
c
m
i
l
k
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
e
r
s
o
c
c
u
p
y
t
h
e
same space, yet are of significantly different w
e
i
g
h
t
s
,
t
h
e
r
e
i
s
a
n
e
e
d
t
o
l
e
v
e
l
t
h
e
p
l
a
y
i
n
g
f
i
e
l
d
"
i
n
measuring quantities diverted for the purposes of
a
t
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
s
t
a
t
e
d
g
o
a
l
s
.
T
h
i
s
i
s
s
u
e
w
i
l
l
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
consideration before a final determination is mad
e
.
B. WASTE STREAM ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS
Issue: Will all cities and counties be required to
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
waste characterization studies as a requirement
of AB 939?
Response: Yes. PRC Sections 41030 and 41330 re
q
u
i
r
e
w
a
s
t
e
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
u
d
i
e
s
a
s
a
n
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
l
p
a
r
t
of the implementing IWM programs. It should
b
e
n
o
t
e
d
,
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
t
h
a
t
P
R
C
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
4
1
8
2
3
,
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
s
joint efforts to accomplish the various requiremen
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
l
a
w
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
s
u
c
h
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
s
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
n
g
m
u
l
t
i
-
jurisdictional waste characterization Stiidies.
Issue: What will be required of cities and counti
e
s
w
h
e
n
t
h
e
y
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
t
h
e
i
r
w
a
s
t
e
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
u
d
y
?
Response: Cities and counties will prepare a wast
e
disposal characterization study and a waste diversion
characterization study. The city or county may p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
w
a
s
t
e
d
i
s
p
o
s
a
l
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
u
d
y
u
s
i
n
g
either new quantitative field data it gathers; exis
t
i
n
g
d
a
t
a
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
f
r
o
m
o
t
h
e
r
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
w
h
i
c
h
a
r
e
similar in population size, demographic charact
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
,
a
n
d
r
a
t
i
o
o
f
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
t
o
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
w
a
s
t
e
s
generated; or suitable data provided by the Board
f
o
r
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
c
a
t
e
g
o
r
i
e
s
o
f
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
.
The waste diversion characterizations will also
n
e
e
d
t
o
b
e
s
t
a
t
i
s
t
i
c
a
l
l
y
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
o
f
a
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
'
s
entire waste stream, must classify the wastes div
e
r
t
e
d
b
y
w
a
s
t
e
t
y
p
e
a
n
d
q
u
a
n
t
i
t
y
,
a
n
d
r
o
u
s
t
s
u
r
v
e
y
b
u
y
-
back and drop-off centers, salvage programs, and
c
u
r
b
s
i
d
e
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
the amount of material being diverted from solid
w
a
s
t
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
C. COMPONENTS
SOURCE REDUC ION
Issue: How can the source reduction achieveme
n
t
s
b
e
q
u
a
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
?
Response: There are several methods of qua
n
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
w
h
i
c
h
a
r
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
b
e
i
n
g
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
development of the draft regulations. The m
o
s
t
c
o
m
m
o
n
l
y
a
c
c
e
p
t
e
d
m
e
t
h
o
d
o
f
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
t
o
t
a
l
amount of material which was source reduced o
v
e
r
a
g
i
v
e
n
t
i
m
e
p
e
r
i
o
d
i
s
t
o
c
o
m
p
a
r
e
t
h
e
w
a
s
t
e
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
figures for the base year with subsequent years
.
A
n
y
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
w
a
s
t
e
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
f
i
g
u
r
e
s
c
o
u
l
d
t
h
e
n
be attributed to source reduction. The dra
f
t
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
n
t
h
e
development of waste generation figures.
One other method of quantifying source reduction would be to utilize an econom
i
c
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
t
o
a
r
r
i
v
e
a
t
a standard rate of source reduction that would occ
u
r
w
i
t
h
e
a
c
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
s
o
u
r
c
e
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
m
e
t
h
o
d
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
d
.
l'a gc 5
Issue: Will local government be requited to implement a mandated set of source reduction act
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
,
o
r
will there be flexibility to implement activities based upon local conditions?
Response: The draft regulations are designed to provide local government with the greates
t
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
flexibility in designing a source reduction program which addresses local conditions. The B
o
a
r
d
h
a
s
contracted with firms to provide expert guidance on the various alternative methodologies wh
i
c
h
a
l
o
c
a
l
government may design into the source reduction component. Rather than direct local gove
r
n
m
e
n
t
t
o
implement a specific set of activities, the regulations will be designed to aid local government in
d
e
c
i
d
i
n
g
which source reduction methodologies are best suited to the community and which will achiev
e
l
o
c
a
l
objectives.
Issue: Should product bans be considered by local government as a source reduction option?
Response: The emergency regulations for the City and County Source Reduction and Recycling Elements
are being drafted to provide local government with the flexibility to implement those sou
r
c
e
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
methodologies which best suit the community's needs. Local product bans will be incl
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
regulations as source reduction option which the local government may choose to evaluate
.
Issue: Should source reduction programs be integrated with a city or county's recycling efforts.
Response: The legislation establishes the requirements for the City and County Source Reduction and
Recycling Elements in PRC Sections 41000 and 41300, respectively. Both the city and county element
are to separately describe a program for source reduction and recycling including materials, methods and
facilities. Though the legislation requires the development of individual components for
b
o
t
h
source
reduction and recycling, it may not be practical, at the local level, to operate each program indep
e
n
d
e
n
t
l
y
.
The integration of the two components (source reduction and recycling) would be described under
"Interrelationship of Specific Components" in the Source Reduction and Recycling Element.
RECYCLING
Issue: Are current recycling activities to be "credited towards local recycling goals?
Response: Yes. To the extent that cities and counties can quantify and verify current recycling activities
which divert materials normally disposed of in landfills, these activities will credit towards attainment of
the statutory 25% diversion goal by 1995 and the 50% goal for 2000. Active recycling efforts should nor,
however, prompt relaxation of aggressive efforts to further increase recycling programs.
Issue: Who will be responsible for tracking the end uses of materials identified in recycling pro
g
r
a
m
s
?
Response: The city or county will be responsible for verifying the achievements of recycling programs
included in the recycling component. This also means verifying the end use of materials
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
existing and proposed recycling programs to be used to reach the 25% and 50% diversio
n
g
o
a
l
s
.
T
h
e
emergency regulations will spell our the type of verification needed.
Issue: Will cities and counties in the remote areas of the state be required to meet the 25%
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
goal?
Response: During the development of emergency regulations and subsequent formal ado
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
regulations, Board staff and its consultants will carefully evaluate the need for exemptions Cr -0m or
reductions in recycling goals for those cities or counties that are unable to feasibly achieve t
h
e
m
a
n
d
a
t
e
d
goals.
Page 6
Issue: Flow is the 'base rate' year, from which me
a
s
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
g
o
a
l
s
a
r
e
m
a
d
e
,
t
o
b
e
determined?
Response: Diversion goals are established on law day and will be measured against a 25% goal in 1995
and 50% in 2000, except as otherwise provided by law. To t
h
i
s
e
x
t
e
n
t
,
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
activities are separate from the development of the Countywi
d
e
I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
W
a
s
t
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
(CIWMP). -The programs to achieve the goals, however, are em
b
o
d
i
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
p
l
a
n
s
s
e
t
f
o
r
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
S
o
u
r
c
e
Reduction and Recycling Elements developed by counties on Jan
u
a
r
y
1
,
1
9
9
1
a
n
d
b
y
c
i
t
i
e
s
o
n
J
u
l
y
1
,
1
9
9
1
.
Therefore, the dates that cities and counties respectively develo
p
t
h
e
i
r
S
o
u
r
c
e
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
Elements should serve as the date from which the "base rate" year
f
r
o
m
w
h
i
c
h
t
h
e
1
9
9
5
a
n
d
2
0
0
0
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
goals are measured. To the extent that the CIWMP plan pro
c
e
s
s
w
i
l
l
"
c
a
t
c
h
u
p
"
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
activities, the two separate processes will merge after all CIWM
P
s
a
r
e
i
n
e
f
f
e
c
t
.
COMPOSI1NG
Issue: The current PRC definition of compost appears t
o
d
i
s
q
u
a
l
i
f
y
,
f
r
o
m
counting towards the 25 and 50
percent goals, composting programs which do not use materials that are sour
c
e
s
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
d
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
municipal solid waste stream.
Response: It would appear from a careful review of the PRC sec
t
i
o
n
4
0
1
1
6
d
e
f
i
n
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
c
o
m
p
o
s
t
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
waste materials used for qualifying composting programs woul
d
h
a
v
e
t
o
o
r
i
g
i
n
a
t
e
i
n
m
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
be source separated. Yard wastes, wood wastes, cannery was
t
e
s
a
n
d
s
e
w
a
g
e
s
l
u
d
g
e
a
r
e
e
x
a
m
p
l
e
s
o
f
materials that could be source separated. The Board staff and i
t
s
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
s
,
i
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
regulations, are considering qualifying composting programs whi
c
h
c
o
m
m
i
n
g
l
e
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
s
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
d
w
a
s
t
e
materials such as yard wastes and sewage sludge. Yard wastes
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
o
r
g
a
n
i
c
w
a
s
t
e
s
r
e
m
o
v
e
d
f
r
o
m
mixed solid wastes at a centralized facility are not source separ
a
t
e
d
a
n
d
s
o
c
o
m
p
o
s
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
e
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
would not help in achieving the 25% and 50% diversion goals.
S
u
c
h
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
s
t
i
l
l
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
worthwhile, however, because they recover valuable resources, m
a
k
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
w
h
i
c
h
h
a
v
e
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
v
a
l
u
e
to the community and save precious landfill space.
SPECIAL WASTES
Issue: Will the emergency regulations address special waste
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
cannery wastes and other food
processing wastes, and may the recycling and composting of th
e
s
e
w
a
s
t
e
s
c
o
u
n
t
t
o
w
a
r
d
2
5
%
recycling goal?
Response: The special waste component of the Source Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
m
u
s
t
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
current and proposed programs for handling, processing and
d
i
s
p
o
s
i
n
g
o
f
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
w
a
s
t
e
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
c
a
n
n
e
r
y
or other food processing wastes. To the extent the existin
g
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
s
e
w
a
s
t
e
s
d
i
v
e
r
t
materials from the landfill, these programs will count.
Page 7 "
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
RESOLUTION NO. 89-636
ESTABLISHING A SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
ADVISORY COUNCIL 5 RESCINDING RESOLUT
I
O
N
N
O
.
8
7
-
5
0
1
BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED by the Board of Supervisors of the
7 County of Riverside, State of Calif
o
r
n
i
a
,
i
n
r
e
g
u
l
a
r
s
e
s
s
i
o
n
assembled on December 19, 1989, that
t
h
e
r
e
i
s
h
e
r
e
b
y
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
a Solid Waste Management Advisory Cou
n
c
i
l
a
s
f
o
l
l
o
w
s
:
1 0
1. Functions
11 a. The Solid Waste Management Adviso
r
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
,
h
e
r
e
i
n
12
called Council, shall study, review, evaluate and make
13
recommendations to the Board of Super
v
i
s
o
r
s
,
h
e
r
e
i
n
c
a
l
l
e
d
B
o
a
r
d
,
14
relative to the preparation and future revisions of th
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
-
15
wide Integrated Waste Management
Plan, which shall include
. 16
source reduction, and recycling ele
m
e
n
t
s
,
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
17
required by the State to be prepared
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
g
u
i
d
a
n
c
e
o
f
a
n
e
w
18
County "Task Force" as set forth in A
B
9
3
9
;
(
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
1
0
9
5
o
f
t
h
e
19
statutes for 1989) including any env
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
r
e
p
o
r
t
s
i
n
connection therewith,
coordination with Cities on waste
20
21
management issues, and solid waste m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
.
The
Council shall file its reports and rec
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
B
o
a
r
d
22
of Supervisors for its consideiation
a
n
d
a
c
t
i
o
n
.
The Board may
23
refer back to the Council, as directed
b
y
t
h
e
B
o
a
r
d
,
a
n
y
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
s
24
and recommendations made by the Counc
i
l
,
a
f
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
25
of the Board.
26
27
28
2
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2
b. The Council may establish committees
a
s
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
t
o
gather knowledge and expertise in areas
p
e
r
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
t
o
S
o
l
i
d
W
a
s
t
e
Management.
2. Membership.
a . The Council shall consist of a minimum of 22
memb-ers as follows:
(1) Sipe persons shall be appointed by
t
h
e
B
o
a
r
d
a
n
d
such appointments shall include ,one mem
b
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
Board (who shall serve as president of th
e
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
,
but shall have no vote) and one person
f
r
o
m
e
a
c
h
Supervisorial District.
(2) One person who is appointed by the C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
o
f
each City whose population is certifie
d
b
y
t
h
a
t
Council to exceed 100,000 at the
t
i
m
e
o
f
appointment.
(3) Two persons who shall be appointed by the
C
o
a
c
h
e
l
l
a
Valley Association of Governments to rep
r
e
s
e
n
t
t
h
e
Cities of Eastern Riverside County not
o
t
h
e
r
w
i
s
e
represented on the Council.
(4) Two persons who shall be appointed b
y
W
e
s
t
e
r
n
Riverside Association of Governments t
o
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
the Cities of Western Riverside County not
otherwise represented on the Council.
(5) One member shall be appointed by the In
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
o
f
Scrap Recycling Industries.
-2--
(6) One member of the environmental community
interested in matters of waste managem
e
n
t
w
h
o
s
h
a
l
l
be nominated by the Chairman of the Cou
n
t
y
B
o
a
r
d
o
f
Supervisors and approved by a majo
r
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
County Board of Supervisors.
(7) Two persons, who are industry repres
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
s
,
shill be appointed by the Board of Dire
c
t
o
r
s
o
f
t
h
e
County Department of Development.,
(8) Three persons, two who are refuse haul
e
r
s
a
n
d
o
n
e
who is a liquid waste hauler, shall be
a
p
p
o
i
n
t
e
d
b
y
c. Each appointing authority may appoint
a
n
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
e
Council Member to serve upon sub-comm
i
t
t
e
e
s
o
r
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
t
h
e
i
r
appointing authority during Council mee
t
i
n
g
s
i
n
t
h
e
a
b
s
e
n
c
e
o
f
t
h
e
primary Council Member.
3. Staff Assistance. The County Administrative Officer,
the County Health Officer, the County
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
a
n
d
t
h
e
Director of Waste Management or their d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
s
,
21 ii
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 / / /
-3-
2
8
10
12
13_
23 ii
24
25
26
27
28
shall each serve as ex Officio memb
e
r
s
b
u
t
s
h
a
l
l
h
a
v
e
n
o
v
o
t
e
.
.
They shall provide such technical a
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
a
n
m
a
y
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
o
r
deemed necessary by the Council. Th
e
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
o
f
W
a
s
t
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
shall act as secretary of the Counci
l
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
k
e
e
p
i
t
s
r
e
c
o
r
d
s
and transmit its recommendations an
d
r
e
p
o
r
t
s
,
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
such staff assistance as may be n
e
e
d
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
.
T
h
e
Director of Waste'Management shall
a
c
t
a
s
a
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
o
r
o
f
t
h
e
County Solid Waste Management Plan and the County-wide
Integrated Waste Management Plan
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
z
e
d
t
o
perform those functions that requir
e
,
f
i
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
c
o
n
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
,
Rules and. Regulations.
4. Reimbursement of Expenses. Reimburse
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
v
o
t
i
n
g
at the pleasure of the concerned appo
i
n
t
i
n
g
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
,
a
n
d
m
a
y
b
e
removed at any time by such appointin
g
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
.
7. Officers.
a. The members of the Council shall el
e
c
t
o
n
e
o
f
i
t
s
members to serve as vice president.
/ / /
-4-
3
b. The'president shall preside at all Council m
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
,
exercise general supervision of the affairs and
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
Council, and serve as an ex officio membe
r
o
f
a
l
l
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
committees. The chairman shall appoint from Co
u
n
c
i
l
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
h
i
p
a
chairperson and committee personnel to serve
o
n
e
a
c
h
c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
established pursuant to this resolution.
C .
The vice president shall assume the duties a
n
d
powers of the president in the event of the preq
i
d
e
n
t
'
s
a
b
s
e
n
c
e
.
d. In the event of the president's and t
h
e
v
i
c
e
president's absence, the secretary shall supervise the election a
president pro tempore.
8. Quorum. A quorum shall consist of eleven members. Any
action of the Council shall require affirmative votes of not less
than a quorum, except that less than a quorum may adjourn a
meeting sine die or to a specified time and place.
9. Meetings. The Council shall hold regular meetings at
such times and places within the County of Ri
v
e
r
s
i
d
e
a
s
m
a
y
b
e
designated by the president or the Council. Th
e
c
a
l
l
i
n
g
,
g
i
v
i
n
g
notice and conducting of meetings shall be in accordance with the
Ralph M. Brown Act (Section 54950 et seq. of th
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
C
o
d
e
)
and as ordered by the president of the Council o
r
a
s
d
i
r
e
c
t
e
d
b
y
a
majority of a quorum.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that Resolution No.
87-501 and any and all prior resolutions and orders adopted by
this Board relating to the establishment, o
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
functions of a Solid Waste Management Advisory
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
a
r
e
h
e
r
e
b
y
rescinded.
///
///
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
February 14, 1990
Appeal of Planning Commission's denial of Tentative
Tract 25636 and Variance 1-90
Enclosed is the Staff Report for Tentative Tract 25636 and
Variance 1-90, a request to convert an existing condominium
subdivision to a 52 lot single family subdivision and a variance
to allow lots ranging from 3271 square feet to 6617 square feet,
located north of the Ramona Expressway and west of Eagle Road.
The Planning Commission denied the above tract map and variance
at its January 10, 1990 meeting for two basic reasons:
1. The proposed subdivision was inconsistent with the
existing neighboring condominium development.
2. The proposed subdivision contained too many sub-7200
sq. ft. lots.
The applicant filed an appeal to the City Council requesting the
Council to reverse the Planning Commission's denial of Tract
25636 and Variance 1-90.
Attached is a revised proposal, further reducing the density and
establishing 7200 sq. ft. lots. A variance would be necessary
for the 50 ft. wide lots.
Respectfully Submitted,
Brian McNabb
Director of Community Development
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
SUBJ:
DATE:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 24738
February 14, 1990
Applicant(s): Famste Investment / Sunnyhills Dev. Co.
1001 "B" Avenue P.O. Box 931
Coronado, CA Carlsbad, CA
(619)591-0112
DESCRIPTION
A request to convert an existing condominium subdivision to a 52
lot subdivision located north of the Ramona Expressway and west
of Eagle Road.
EXHIBIT "A" Existing General Plan
EXHIBIT "B" Existing Zoning
EXHIBIT "C" Current Uses
EXHIBIT "D" Existing Circulation
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The subject property is not within a designated "A" flood zone.
The subject property is not located within a known seismic zone.
However, a seismic study zone is about one mile to the north.
Water and sewer service is available in the existing streets.
Mitigation from traffic noise along the Ramona Expressway has
been partially been effected with the existing block wall.
The environmental review identified the following impacts the
project has on the City and its services. They are as follows:
[1] Local and regional drainage
[2] Local roadways and intersections
[3] Parks
[4] Public safety structures and equipment
TTM 25636 February 20, 1990 PAGE 1
[5] Public safety staffing
[6] Noise
[7] Regional transportation construction and
maintenance
[8] Increased street repair and street cleaning and
support equipment
[9] School impact
[10] Need for youth centers, senior centers, and other
public facilities
These impacts must be discussed in greater detail in order to
understand their full implications.
Local drainage is that water that is generated by run off and is
carried to the regional system via the streets, ditches, small
open drainage channels, and storm sewers usually sized less than
36" or not a part of the regional master plan. Normally, the
developer is responsible for all the cost of improvement for
local drainage.
Regional drainage is the cumulative impact of local run off. In
San Jacinto, this translates into the implementation of the
Regional Master Drainage Plan. A new analysis of this plan is
scheduled by Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District in mid 1989. The impacts of this tract can
only be met by participating financially in the construction.
This correlates into a current fee of $3700.00 per gross acre
mitigation fee, to be paid prior to the recordation of a Final
Map. The fee in effect at the time of recordation will be the
basis.
Local roadways and intersection are of course, impacted by
additional traffic. A lot in a single family subdivision
generally averages between 7 and 9 trips per day. Added traffic
creates needs for controlled intersections. The major
intersections closest to a development are the one impacted most
by the traffic. As other roadway options are available, the
impacts geometrically reduce. However, the cumulative impact of
all development together may create a need for signalization at
intersections further away from the development first.
Staff has prepared a plan that estimates where traffic signal
ultimately may be placed. Funds to construct those intersections
are extracted from developments as the assumption is the signal
is not needed if further development did not occur.
Tract 25636 will generate approximately between 364 to 468 trips
per day. The streets receiving the greatest amount of this
traffic will be Eagle Road, Gold Street, and Community College
Drive. The intersections at the Ramona Expressway and Eagle
Road, and at Community College Drive and State Street. The
mitigation fee for Tract 25636 is currently $150.00 per unit, to
TTM 25636 February 20, 1990 PAGE 2
be paid at the time of permit issuance unless there is an
immediate need, at the time of map recordation, to signalize any
of the intersections noted above.
Parks are impacted by residential development. The General Plan
lists a need of 3 acres of public park per 1000 people. The
Subdivision Map Act allows the collection of park fees or the
requirement to dedicate and improve a park. The ideal park size
for a neighborhood park is somewhere between 5 and seven acres,
which translates into serving 1600-2300 people. The correct
occupancy rate per unit in San Jacinto is about 2.53. The new
single family subdivision are suspected to be closer to 3.0.
Therefore, for every 500-700 dwelling units, there should be at
least neighborhood park.
Tract 25636 will consist of 52 units, which does not generate a
need for a park by itself. Valleywide Regional Park is located
about a two and one half mile from the new subdivision.
The impacts of the development on parks will be mitigated by the
payment of park fees which will be used to create and equip new
parks or to rehabilitate existing parks.
As more development occurs, it naturally creates a need to expand
public safety services. The type of development determines the
impact on public services. Typically, police service is impacted
to a greater extent than fire service, which is not to minimize
fire service impacts. For example, a family apartment project
creates more calls for police service than a single family
subdivision. This can create an immediate need for an increase
in staffing, depending on the size of the project.
The increase in number of units creates more potential for fire
calls but usually doesn't necessitate the need for increase
personnel. However, a senior citizen project will definitely
create more calls for fire service than a family development. A
larger measure of impact on fire service is response time.
In any case, more personnel creates a direct need to have
equipment for that personnel. The staffing level San Jacinto is
attempting to maintain is 2.5 non supervisorial police per 1000
people. The average cost of police personnel and equipment in
1988 was approximately 37.00 per person per year, for non-
supervisorial personnel. By extension, new development also
creates a need to house additional personnel and equipment.
Funding sources for the entire police budget, such as property
taxes and sales tax are also the funding sources for general
governmental services. In San Jacinto, the budget for the Police
Department exceeds these revenue sources.
The ultimate goal of the San Jacinto Fire Department is to be
able to respond to all calls within 5 minutes. As development
TTM 25636 February 20, 1990 PAGE 3
occurs, further from the City core, the response time drops. The
City currently has one fire station in the center of town. A
second fire station is due to be constructed in the next year. A
third potential site is being acquired for future construction.
The cost of construction is currently about $250,000.00. A fire
engine costs $225,000.00 to purchase and equip. Staffing for a
fire station also runs approximately $250,000.00 per year. The
traditional funding sources for fire services are identical to
those for police service.
The proposed project is located approximately 1 3/4 miles from
the Fire Station at Pico and Sixth Street. When the station is
moved to the new Civic Center site on Esplanade Avenue, the
distance will be about 2 1/2 miles from the site.
The developer shall create or join a Public Safety Mello-Roos
District.
All development that induces motor vehicle usage has a negative
impact on the environment. A single project creates few
- problems. The cumulative impacts of all development within a
region, including smokes, tank discharge, auto emission, length
of drive, location of business in the region, and housing
availability and cost all influence the air quality. The main
polluter is the motor vehicle idling in traffic. Currently, most
commerce is located in Orange, Los Angeles, and parts of
Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. Most of the affordable
housing is located in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties.
Therefore, the migration of workers in the morning is westerly
and vice versa in the P.M. In this valley two things can be done
to improve air quality. The most immediate method is to
participate and encourage car pooling. The other, longer range
solution is to move commerce to the east.
There are two regional roads that pass through San Jacinto,
Ramona Expressway and Sanderson Avenue. They are regional
because they are used to transport people efficiently around the
cities to destinations outside the valley. Neither of these
streets are constructed to their ultimate and the existing
roadways for each are in need of repair. While it may not be
appropriate to expect a development contiguous to a regional
roadway to finance total construction of the roadway, it is fair
to expect that development to pay its fair share. There is
approximately $4,686,400.00 of new construction needed to be
performed in the City limits and $1,000,000.00 in needed
maintenance. Traditional funding sources are not adequate for
these improvements. The developers should pay their fair share
for this work while the City must also participate on behalf of
the existing population. This cost breaks down to approximate
$820.00 per acre for the 11 square miles of property in the City.
Tract 25636 is being developed on 8.89 acres. Therefore their
TTM 25636 February 20, 1990 PAGE 4
fair share contribution to mitigate their impact on the
expressway is $7289.80.
Additional development with its added traffic has an impact on
existing streets. Residential development has more traffic
originating from it. Industrial traffic generally has heavier
traffic. Commercial areas attracts traffic. All of this leads
to a breakdown of the streets. Development also adds more street
mileage to maintain. The funding sources for road maintenance
are essentially the same as those for road construction. These
sources don't begin to cover the road repairs needed. There are
approximately 100 miles of roadway in the City that need some
degree of maintenance. The estimated cost of this maintenance is
$5,000,000 for the next ten years. The City will receive
approximately $1,500,000 from outside sources during this time
period for road maintenance. This adds up to a cost of $500.00
per acre or $4445 for Tract 25636. This will pay for maintenance
and road maintenance equipment to reduce the cost of the work.
Schools are impacted by residential development. State law has
set the maximum that can be charged for school impact mitigation
for both residential and non-residential uses. Unless state law
changes, the impact of development on schools is generally
considered as mitigated. However, the State lags behind
development in providing funds for school development. The City
may require the developer to participate in a financing district
to pay for schools.
Residential development increases demand for public facilities
such as libraries, youth centers, senior centers, etc. Some of
these facilities are funded from outside sources. There are no
standard funding mechanisms for these facilities. Each time a
need for a new building is determined, governmental agencies
scramble to find a funding source. Examples of funding sources
are Community Development Block Grant entitlement funds, bond
sales, and sale/lease back.
The possible City public facilities that will be need in the
future, as identified by staff are a youth center, expanded
senior citizens center, and police department expansion. Youth
center is estimated to cost $200,000.00, an expanded senior
center $10,000.00, and police department expansion unknown at
this time. These estimated costs plus a figure of $250,000.00
for possible future expansion of the Police Department total
$460,000.00. This translates to $65.00 per acre.
The fair charge contribution of Tract 25636 for their impact on
the future needed public facilities is $577.85.
The property is within the historic range of the Stephen's
Kangaroo Rat. However, the site was graded and is basically
surrounded by development.
TTM 25636 February 20, 1990 PAGE 5
DISCUSSION
Tract 15130 was a condominium project approved and recorded in
the County in the early 1980's. The development plans included a
two club houses and two swimming pools with private streets. The
northerly half of the development has been constructed. The
County approved project required a homeowner's association.
The south half is under construction with eleven houses built.
In October 1989 the developer requested the Planning Commission
allow them to delete the club house and substitute a tennis court
in place of the swimming.
The Planning Commission required the developer to file a formal
application for an amendment to the development plan.
After further deliberation by the developer, it was decided to
apply for a resubdivision.
The developer's proposal is resubdivide the land from a 69
condominium subdivision, with detached and attached homes, to 52
single family lots with detached homes.
Lots 1 through 11 are under construction with homes similar to
the types of built to the north. These lot sizes range from 3271
sq. ft. to 6617 sq. ft.
Lot 7 is a detached model home and lots 1 and 2, 3 and 4, 5 and
6, 8 and 9, and 10 and 11 have a common wall design to it.
The remaining 41 lots range from 6000 sq. ft. to 10,113 sq. ft.
Altogether there are 40 lots that do not meet the City's
subdivision standards. The applicant is therefore applying for a
variance to allow the under sized lots because of the existing
utility lines and streets.
All of the lots will have access to them from the existing
private streets. Pleasant Hill Rd., La Cumbre Ct., Sierra Seneca
Dr., Bushy Tail Tr., New Laredo Dr., and Conastoga Rd. are the
private streets.
The developer has requested the private streets be dedicated to
public. Staff has indicated it will not support this request.
All utilities are in the private streets to service each lot.
Eagle Road, Country Village Drive, and Gold Street are public
streets.
TTM 25636 February 20, 1990 PAGE 6
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission denied the above tract map at its January
10, 1990 meeting.
If the City Council desires to approve Tentative Tract Map 25636,
it should incorporate, the attached Findings of Fact and
Conditions of Approval, and grant a Negative Declarartion.
Brian McNabb
Director of Community Development
TTM 25636 February 20, 1990 PAGE 7
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Tract 15130 is an existing condominium subdivision on the
subject land.
1. Tract 25636 is not located within a known flood zone.
2. Tract 25636 is not located within a known seismic zone.
3. All utilities are available to each lot.
4. Pleasant Hill Rd., La Cumbre Ct., Sierra Seneca Dr., Bushy
Tail Tr., New Laredo Dr., and Conastoga Rd. are private
streets
5. 40 lots do not meet the 7200 sq. ft. minimum lot size.
6. Lots 1 and 2, 3 and 4, 5 and 6, 8 and 9, and 10 and 11 have
a common wall design.
7. A variance has been applied to allow lots less than 7200 sq.
ft.
TTM 25636 February 20, 1990 PAGE 8
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION
1. Either pay regional storm drain fee in affect at time of
recordation, currently $3700 per gross acre or join a
drainage financing district. The city shall determine which
option is available to applicant.
2. Pay $150.00 per unit for traffic signalization.
3. Pay fees for mitigation of regional and local roadway
maintenance in effect at the time of final map recordation.
4. Pay public facility mitigation fee.
5. Participate in school mitigation which may include a school
financing district, as determined by the City Council.
6. The subject site is within the range of the Stephen's
Kangaroo Rat habitat, however, development surrounds the
site.
7. Pay $90.00 per unit toward construction and maintenance of
car pooling lot and program.
8. Join a Public Safety Mello-Roos District #3.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
COMPLY WITH THE ATTACHED FIRE DEPARTMENT'S CHECKLIST DATED
DECEMBER 20 1989 AND INCORPORATED HEREIN.
PUBLIC WORKS
(1 ) Street trees shall be purchased from City for planting in
the public right of way.
(2 ) Construct a 5.5 foot sidewalk per City standards along both
sides of Country Village Drive and on Eagle road from the
Ramona Expressway to the tract boundary.
(3 ) Install curb and gutter and handicap ramps per City
Standards and Specifications.
(4 ) The driveway shall be a minimum 5 feet from the property
line.
(5 ) Landscape the Ramona Expressway between the wall and
existing paving. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be
submitted for approval. Irrigation system shall be MaxiCom
ready with tensiometer.
TTM 25636 February 20, 1990 PAGE 9
PLANNING
(1 ) Submit an application for a variance requesting the lots,
less than 7200 sq. ft., be allowed.
(2 ) There shall be an additional ten feet of dedication along
Gold Street, Eagle Road from Country Village Drive to the
south boundary of Tract 15130 and on the north side of
Country Village Drive for a landscape area to match existing
subdivision landscape to the north and landscape the area.
(3 ) A landscape plan shall be submitted for approval including
live landscaping and an automatic sprinkler system.
(4 ) Provide block wall per City requirements.
(5 ) Install a six foot decorative masonry block wall around the
EMWD well site.
(6 ) Fencing shall be installed where required by City
regulations.
(7 ) Pay all fees before construction.
(8 ) The developer shall contribute $150 per unit toward the
signalization in the project area.
(9 ) All utilities shall be underground.
(10) Consult with the San Jacinto Post Office regarding the type
and placement of the mail boxes.
(11) All buildings for which permits valued in excess of $1500.00
are issued shall, prior to final inspection, paint with
white paint on dark background on the front curb face the
address of said building. Numbers shall be a minimum of 3
inches high.
(12) The owner of all buildings in the City shall be responsible
for installing the address on the mailbox and on the
structure itself. Building numbers shall be a minimum of 3
inches tall and on a contrasting background.
TTM 25636 February 20, 1990 PAGE 10
RAMONA
EXHIBIT "A"
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN
TT 25636
V 1-90
EXPRESSW4 1'-
Low Density Residential'
, L-117]
Medium Density
Residential
33
4
45
Mt. San Jacint -,ommunity College , _Open Spa
re WO
COMMUANTY - C -OLLEGE -
/7 -1/
69
70
74
5
'sal I
14
41
/40
139
158
67
66
65
64
63
62
Ti 49,50
/45114
•••
-- COUNTRY --- -VILLAGE
Low Density
Residential
ommunity Commercial
Low Density Residential
22
23
24
15
26
27
30
.3n7-7
79
BO
81
82
85
84
5
37
88
8
BS
90
B
41/FAc AC
9
MSJC
Open Space 5 8
5.
127
/26
69168
L_l__J
145 /44
70
4
/42
/4/
/40
71
R-2, Multi Family
R-3, Multi Family'._
58
0
56 81
82
55
54
F
5 I'
R-3, Multi Famil
1
7
38 87
88
.99
90
90
2
a me, Nt
(1? 94
4/
C-2, General
Commercial
C-2,
General Commercia
- COUNTRY-- -ii/L-LAGE
R-3, Multi Family
Multi Family
RAMONA
EXHIBIT "B"
EXISTING ZONING
IT 25636
V 1-90
Multi Family
CONMOVITY -COLLEGE
24
25
6
27
28
29
64
39
I 1.18
EJE7
/36
/35
79
80
3
1-1374-1
46
45
COWIN/FY --COLLEGE -
.5,10
College
6
193
67
66 /41
65 /91
64 140
Existing Subdivision
[7!Condominiums
79
80
Vacant College Parking
82
11 (41.
87
Vacant (Graded)
49
93 194 4 44
83
8/
84
8
8
•n••
-ilkLAGE ------- COUNTRY - -DR
Vacant
L I
Vacant (Graded)
units under
construction
Single Family
Residential
.50.. /5
69
23
24
2
26
27
29
0
34
35
55
—J
58
51 .
46
45
/39
138
Er-E
r —r/712
/31
/JO
;291
/2
/26
EXHIBIT "C"
CURRENT USES
TT 25636
V 1-90
RAMONA --XPRES5i+31
COMMUNITY - -C-OLLEGE
66' Collector Roadway
15130
/42
CSI
/40
24
25 73
26
7
28
29
76
60
59
50
52
3
•;---1 Collector Roadway •44.. 5i•
/32 lector Roadway 85 0
86
.99
127
/26
91
92
- - COUNTRY-- --VILLAGE
66' Collector Roadway:.
-OR
as-0 ,0_ of
142' Arterial
RAMONA XPRESSOPI
EXHIBIT "D"
EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT
TT 25636
V 1-90
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0125636 WIC.ANT ZO/t€ ------ ---------------------------- e age., 14411. P. SW' ' A. 7,421 I i SF. I at+ A. 6,445 t 0 A. 6,000 ' 0 A. 6,000 KSA • V As 6,042 sr. A. 6,505 SF. Al A. 6,777 sr. 0 1 • • ...P. A. 4167 Sr, CI RES/0E74,774L IPSE R-J II(ID A., 4,532 SF,) 3,771 SF.' I ' 0. /2 144 ,-0— 543 A. 4,965 ® A. 3,500 3.6.41 Si's"- 1 5,4121117, A4,274 I• S. 1 RES.M7177AZ AMC R-J - - --E4 e - - B240— - rn te4CANT AMC R-/ CD 0 A. 6,506 Sr. As 6,570 \ k 5/. I A. 7,544 LO CO 1402-1/E2=1168121 PM,. ICO•NO f••n•00C1 71.141 • I MTN. UM 1St VOCAff Monet* ura we /4.02.ft Weabrt UM 41*--....—..OK,srerroa...twr till.MUIMEUZI Ipm, taarla Inc. Umx atc me lovIVEM eild, WM . 0•A INIVMDS, CAL, in Mdl•••11................. 00•1... MAP•tell KNES,AL NOTES, V= Pa. U.OZ Va.410 MIS . 1101•LP, SD, 1.1n7148 LI .---tomposole p5eamonatt terE *at lernmItottv ~Or Mt tilti r.• -- IMILIT Ilowerpown soaLUIM UM annel ro..ge erst Manor ...NM. --iguragmem neMSVU Par.ta -1 V.• VICINITY MAP mot 70 scAlt ENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 25636 Lo.w. LEG Al DESCRIPTION 16,114=0,190.1 f. ur, WI% 10-.11. WI 11191111X UT NT NO ,P10 “Cn Hat 7144 S MYR Mo1011 NYONCE PAR G.VSOCIATES, NC. WASTE INVESTMENT CO, NC, 11011 ASCU 15171VOI STIC4 PARTNENSMP SUNNY HILLS GENEJRAL VOW,* 171.4 71111-01P1 war. co, we am Oaf LO Kt, NMI
AI a 41141RO. 10. Nem& 0/&&&1004011, .01113WEIN= LOT I S R C U V1C001-T fOrwa a 0 (Job *boo 1 MOO 03111.021 &LAN NO. I. T-4.11,a1411 Lars 110 as - N443 110.1.-"a amoral Kole= OSLCO HASSAN 0.0.00X 031 CARLSOACI, CA 02000 1010117.4-010110 AP. 443-206-043 433-2040303 1/4.4.1 O.** Wan{ 3010 Sa. 09 TO 100. ANICI Lars 140 0100 TR 140.11.120 Nal...narna-aos SIV00010010 COUNTY 1000T1NO 0001.0000 Ara. 11.7 ACP.. Moo.. Sohool 1311.1111111i1 SAN JACINTO 1.101011110 astralow 0.Wean - WATS.. - anNa &No trio, w 00.CAL.001000 Saw 00.CA1-0A0 ToNo030.19.7.0. Wt. 00 S.OT0 MN. &wooly Plooktrnoo 9330 001.FT.MIN. LIIT0 - SST 60CLPT00N. MOW,
AGEND
TO:
FROM:
SUBJ:
MEMO
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
Henry T. Garcia, Asst. City Manager
16th Year CDBG Recommendation
DATE: 02-14-90
Staff has received testimony at two (2) previously held
Public Hearings reference obtaining citizen input for
the 16th Year CDBG Program. Based upon the results of
both hearings, Staff recommends the City Council authorize
the entire allocated amount of $86,000 for the ongoing
7th Street Sewer and Water Line Project.
By way of background, the Council previously authorized
15th Year CDBG funds in the amount of $53,500 for the
design and engineering services for the 7th Street Sewer
and Water line Project.
Staff's recommendation is based upon two (2) factors:
1. Completion of sewer and water line project will enhance
economic development in the area.
2. The City Council has previously taken action reference
this project, therefore, continuity between the 15th
Year CDBG and 16th Year CDBG Program is highly
desirable.
Staff estimates the 16th Year CDBG allocation will be
approximately $86,000, based upon the overall Riverside
County allocation of $3,843,200. Should the County's
allocation increase, Staff will return to the City Council
with further recommendations.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Respectfully submitted,
#004—t
HENRY T. GARCIA
nr
AGSM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJ:
MEMO
Ross S. Nammar, City Manager
Henry T. Garcia, Asst. City Manager
Civic Center Project - Phase I
DATE: 02-12-90
By way of background, the City Council directed Staff to
reject all bids in their entirety and rebid the Civic Center
Project. Furthermore, the Council directed Staff to work
with John Carl Warnecke & Associates, reference redrawing
the original plans in order to reduce overall costs.
Finally, the City Council directed Staff to rebid the Project.
Based on the aforementioned, Staff is prepared to submit
to the City Council the following information and recommen-
dation:
As directed by the City Council, Staff has recently completed
negotiating with JCWA regarding the cost(s) to redraw and
rewrite the plans and specifications for the Civic Center
Project. Based upon two (2) months of continuous negotiations,
with JCWA and their consultants, the architect is eager
to perform the necessary work on a time and material basis.
Please note that conditions for such an agreement are covered
in Articles 7.7, 7.8 and 15.1 of our original Agreement.
The architect has quoted a price of $195,000 to accomplish
the Civic Center redesign (Phase I only). Please note
that the $195,000 fee is estimated to save the City of
San Jacinto approximately one million to one point five
million ($1,000,000 to $1,500,000) from the original bid
price of $10,998,000, submitted by Pepper West.
At this time, Staff is prepared to recommend that the City
Council direct Staff to proceed with rebidding the Civic
Center Project - Phase I, utilizing the original bid docu-
ments with no modifications. This recommendation stems
primarily from the fact that Staff has carefully analyzed
trends within the construction field, noting that the market
place at this time favors the City of San Jacinto receiving
a solid bid. Additional factors which support Staff's
recommendation are as follows:
1. Staff is now of the opinion that the City of San Jacinto
has the financial capability to issue new bonds to
complete the project, if necessary.
Civic Center Project - Phase I
Page 2
2. Based upon the tremendous growth the City is
experiencing at this time, Staff feels the timing
is right to proceed with the project. Please note
that Staff believes there is a potential to develop
several commercial areas immediately. These commercial
areas, plus our tremendous residential development,
further strengthen our economic base.
3. The City of San Jacinto is pursuing a multitude of
annexations, which when approved, create the need
for more Staff and physical workspace. It should be
noted that the aforementioned annexations could conceivably
double the size of the City of San Jacinto.
In summary, Staff believes that it is not premature to
rebid the original Civic Center - Phase I Project, based
upon the aforementioned factors.
Additionally, Staff recommends the City Council impose
certain fees on all new development projects in order to
provide a funding mechanism to build future municipal
facilities including the Police Department. The City Council
should be aware that architectual costs for the design
and construction document phase of the Police Department
will cost in excess of $500,000.
If you should have any questions, Staff will be more than
happy to address your concerns.
Respectfully submitted,
/Nr—e.14.12.
HENRY T. GARCIA
nr
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM:
SUBJ:
DATE:
Ross S. Nammar, City Manager
Cooperative Activities with the City of Hemet
02-09-90
Last month Mayor Ford and Mayor Nishino met with the
respective City Managers to discuss areas of possible
cooperation between the two (2) Cities.
Three (3) areas were identified:
1. Police/Fire joint dispatch and communications.
Both agencies will be facing the need for new
dispatch and communication equipment. In addition,
both Cities are considering new police facilities
in the future. Communication equipment typically
costs in the range of $150,000 to $250,000 and
24-hour operations requires substantial staffing
costs. It may be possible to combine efforts,
but this will require substantial time by both
Cities to research numerous issues, but it has
potential for considerable return. Also, this is
timely as throughout the County of Riverside we
are reviewing and determining our police and fire
dispatch and communications equipment needs.
2. Refuse recycling.
Both San Jacinto and Hemet will be required, by State
law, to develop a recycling program to reduce the
amount of waste transported to the landfill (AB939).
Although San Jacinto's service is private franchise
service, and Hemet's a municipal service, this will
add to the challenge of a joint program. It would be
worthwhile to pool our resources to investigate the
new requirements of the law.
3. City annexations.
Two years ago a joint committee was formed to discuss
areas of annexation between boundaries of the two (2)
Cities. An Agreement was formalized in principle,
but not finalized. In addition to finalizing the prior
Agreement, it may be beneficial to have a committee
to discuss ongoing jurisdictional issues, example:
Park Hill.
Cooperative Activities with the City of Hemet
Page 2
Hemet's City Manager will be presenting a similar report
at their regular Council Meeting of February 13, 1990,
with my report and recommendations following to be
officially submitted to you at the regular Council Meeting
of February 20, 1990:
1. Authorize Staff to study the feasibility of a joint
Safety/Communications Center and a joint Refuse
Recycling Program.
2. Appoint two (2) Council Members to continue annexation
discussions.
Respectfully submitted,
ROSS S. NAMMAR
nr