HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 1/16/1990DATE:
TIME:
AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JAClNTO CITY COUNCIL
THE COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
January 16, 1990
7:30 p.m'
'
ROLL CALL: Rose, Divine, Redding, Boykin, Ford
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
NO`TlCE TO PUBLIC
"
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine
and will be enacted by one motion by the City Council in the form
listed.
There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion
unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests
specified items to be removed and/or disc4ssed'
Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come forward,
upon invitation of the Mayor, state their name, address, and the Consent
Calendar item number.
CONSENT CALENDAR - City MaDag2[
*^ Approval of Minutes of January 2, 1990 as submitted'
(Receive and File).
B. Approval of Warrants No.'s 21316 through 21402 as
submitted by the Finance Director.
C. Treasurer's Office Time Deposit Register for
1989. (Receive and File).
December,
D. Financial Report of Activity for the period December,
1989' (Receive and File).
E. Ordinance for Adoption - Ordinance No. 891
An Ordinance of the City of San Jacinto, regulating
construction, reconstruction, abandonment and
destruction of wells.
F. Acceptance of Grant Deed from P R Equities, Ltd.
Park site along Esplanade Ave. in Community Facilities
District #2. Area is 5+ acres' (Staff recommends
acceptance and recordation)'
B. Ordinance for Adoption - Ordinance No. 887
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California, approving Change of Zone 25-89
amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto'
H. Final Tract Map 25021
Applicant: GGP Development
Location: South side of Idyllwild Drive, east of
State, west of San Jacinto High School'
Staff recommends Mayor be authorized to execute the
final map and agreement for construction of street
improvements, as recommended by Planning Commission,
Acceptance of Public Improvements - Tract 21564-7 and
21564-B
Applicant: Parkland Associates
Location: Park Hill Collection
(Staff recommends acceptance)
January 16, 1990
Page 2
II.
J. Resolution for Ado2tion - Resolution No. 1861
A Resolution of the City of San Jacinto declaring
its intention to initiate on its own motion
proceedings to annex certain uninhabited territory
known as Annexation No. 67.
K. Acceptance of Road Deed from Agri Empire along 7th St.
between Main and Kellam.
acceptance.)
(Staff recommends
L. Acceptance of Road Deed from P R Equities within
Community Facilities District #2.
(Staff recommends acceptance.)
M. Resolution for Ado2tion - Resolution No. 1862
A Resolution of the City of San Jacinto declaring
its intention to initiate on its own motion
proceedings to annex certain inhabited territory
known as Annexation No. 68.
N. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda pursuant
to City Attorney.
0. Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 894
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto governing development in hillside areas.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by: Seconded by: Action; to approve
consent calendar items A through 0 as recommended by Staff,
adopt Ordinance Nos. 891 and 887 and Resolution Nos. 1861
and 1862, and introduce Ordinance No. 894 and to waive
reading in full.
Vote:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A.
B.
Issuance of Industrial Development Authority (IDA)
Bonds.
Applicant:
Location:
Approval of
Project.
Motion by:
Edelbrock Foundry Corporation
1320 Buena Vista St., San Jacinto, CA
issuance of bonds for above referenced
Seconded by: Action:
Vote:
Pre -Annexation Draft Environmental Impact Report
and Supplemental EIR and Specific Plan 1-89
Applicant: Paragon Homes, Inc.
Location: Park Hill
A proposal to develop 558 Jots on approx. 365 acres
located on the westerly 3/4 of Park Hill proper.
Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 895
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California approving Change of Zone 27-89
amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto.
Motion by: Secondedrby: Action: to
introduce Ordinance No. 895 to second reading and
waive the reading in full and grant negative
declaration. Vote:
January 16, 1990
Page 3
C. Planned Unit Development 5-B9
°
Applicant: Palm Avenue Estates
Location: Northwest corner of Palm Avenue at 7th St'
A proposal to establish a Planned Unit Development
overlay on Tract 24922, which is a proposal to
divide 17.5 acres into e2 lots.
Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 896
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California, approving Planned Unit Develop-
ment 5-B9 amending Zoning Map of the City of San
Jacinto.
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to
introduce Ordinance No. e96 to second reading and
waive the reading in full. Vote
III' ORAL COMMUNICATION
Members of the Audience wishing to address the City Council should fill
out the appropriate form and hand it to the Deputy City Clerk prior
to the meeting. Council is prohibited by State law from taking action
on items not listed on the agenda unless of an emergency nature.
IV.
CITY DEPARTMENTS
a. Community Development
(1) Building Code Ordinance
Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 893
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City o an
Jacinto regulating procedures for abating dangerous
buildings by adopting the Uniform Code for the Abate-
ment of Dangerous Buildings 19B8 Edition, Uniform
Building Code 19BB Edition, Uniform Plumbing Code
198B Edition, Uniform Housing Code 19BB Edition,
Uniform Mechanical Code 19B8, Uniform Sign Code 19BB
Edition, Uniform Administrative Code 19B8 Edition
and repealing conflicting ordinances, and revising
fees.
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to
introduce Ordinance No. e93 to second reading and waive
the reading in full. Vote
V. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/COMMENTS
a. Selection of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem
VI. EXECUTIVE SESSION
*
Motion by: Seconded by.Action: to go into
ewecutive-����onn�1 �e��ion. �-ote:_ Time:
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to return to
regular session' Vote: Time:
V%%. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to adjourn
Vote:
Meeting adjourned at
-1
p.m.
Next regular City Council meeting February 6, 1989
MINUTES
San Jacinto City Council
the Council Sitting as
the Redevelopment Agency
and Industrial Development Authority
Regular Meeting
January 2, 1990
The regular meeting Of the San Jacinto City Council, the Council sitting as
the Redevelopment Agency and Industrial Development Authority was Called to
Order by Mayor Ford at 7:36 p'm' at the Community Center, 025 S. Pico.
Roll Call - Present: Councilmen Rose, Divine, Boykin and Ford
Absent: Councilman Redding (excused absence)
Staff Members Present: Assistant City Manager Garcia, Community Development
Director McNabb, Police Chief KOzma, Assistant Planner
Ni3hiOO aDd Deputy City Clerk Sherman
Pledge Of Allegiance Led by Mayor Ford
l CONSENT CALENDAR
A Approval Of minutes Of December 19, 1989 as submitted. (Receive and file.)
B` Approval Of warrants NO,3 21174 through 21315 in the amount Of $208,897.97
as submitted hv the Finance Director
C. Ordinance NO,-~O5 for adoption; approving Change Of Zone 15-89 amending
the Zoning Map.
D. Ordinance NO. 880 for adoption; approving Change Of Zone 23-89 amending
the ZOUiDq Map.
E. Ordinance NO, 887 for adoption; approving Change Of Zone 25-89 amending
the Zoning Map'
F. Ordinance NO. OOO for adoption; approving Change Of Zone 24-89 amending
the ZOOiDq Map,
G. Ordinance NO. 889 for adoption; approving Change Of IODe 21-89 amending
the ZODiDq Map'
H. Ordinance NO. 891 for introduction; regulating construction, reconstruc-
tion, abandonment and destruction Of wells.
I. City Of San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency Audit Reports for fiscal year
1988-89'(Receive and file,)
J. City OfSan Jacinto Audit ReOrt3 for fiscal year 1988-89.
(Receive and file.)
K. Approval Of Riverside County Sheriff's Department's Posse's request for
annual "Cattle Drive". (City Manager recommends approval.)
L. Approval Of request for reduction Of Performance Bond Security for Parcel
Map 23078, Maze Stone RaOChOS'
M. Final Tract 23793. Applicant: Barratt American, Inc. Location: north
Of Esplanade, west Of YilliDeS. Staff recommends approval Of Final Tract
Map 23793.
N. Acceptance Of Road Deed from Record Farms, Ltd, Proposed intersection
with extension Of Esplanade Avenue. (Staff recommends approval.)
U Ordinance NO 884 for adoption; approving Planned Unit Development 6-89
� amending the Zoning Map. (Staff recommends cont-iOuaOCe to February 20, 1990.)
P. Acceptance Of Declaration Of Posting Agenda pursuant to City Attorney.
The Mayor asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak OO any item on
the consent calendar.
I E. Hike Bailey, Director Of Planning and Development for the Hemet Unified
5chO6l District spoke at length in opposition to the adoption Of Ordinance
No. 887 due to current overcrowding in the district and the impact that
new development is having OO classroom and Other facilities.
-1-
I Consent Calendar - continued
Councilman Boykin moved to approve the consent calendar with the exception of
Items I-E and 1-0, to adopt Ordinances No.s 885, 885, 888 and 889 on
second reading and waive reading in full'
Seconded by Councilman Rose
Motion carried 4-0'
I E. Ordinance No. 887
Councilman Divine moved to continue Item I-E to the January 16 meeting.
Seconded by Councilman Boykin
Motion carried 4-0,
I O. Ordinance No. 884, Planned Unit Development
John CUlt0n, 990 W. Florida Avenue, Hemet, and Jim Fain, 2501 Woodlands
way, Oceanside, dgvelopers, both spoke concerning open space, driveways
and the Conditions of Approval' Both requested expeditious handling of
this matter'
Councilman Boykin moved to attach Condition 29, apply for and obtain d parking
variance, to the Conditions of Approval, re -introduce 0rdinanCe No. 884
to second reading and waive reading in full'
Seconded by Councilman Divine
Il ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
A. Judy Whitson, Director, Chamber of Commerce - Permit for Circus,
operated by Christiansen Amusement Park, to be held at Valley -wide'
Request to waive fees; fund raiser for the Chamber'
Councilman Boykin moved to issue license and waive all fees.
Seconded by Councilman Rose
Motion carried 4-0'
III CITY DEPARTMENTS
A. City Manager
/�)Library Construction Bond Act. Mrs. Doris Boykin, 2132 VillineS,
` ' /Pre5ident of Friends of the San Jacinto Library) has talked to
(President
Woods, Director of the Riverside City -County Library, who
recmm/ended the City file a "Notice of Intent" and authorize the
City Manager to submit it. The Notice of Intent is not binding'
/2\ Jeannette Hofmann, 21100 Highway 79 5p, 89, also spoke in favor of
submitting the "Notice of Intent" and the importance of d good library.
Mrs. Hofmann is Vice President of Friends of the San Jacinto Library
and the City's representative on the County Library Board. Accord-
ing to Mrs. Hofmann the City would put up 35 percent of the money
with the balance being State bonds'
Councilman Divine moved to instruct the City Manager to submit "Notice of Intent"
for library construction funds.
Seconded by Councilman Rose
Motion carried 4-0
B. Community Development
/l\ Lift Station - Mistletoe and Artesia. Community Development Director
� � McNabb spoke on the need for d lift station (which the City purchased
from San Jacinto Partners) and the necessity to create a lift station
district involving approximately 120 acres' In order to create the
, district, seLtimg the -initial and ultimateboLmdaries, am' mndimamce
must be -adopted.. Ordinance No. 892 was read.
2 January 1990
III City Departments - continued
B. Communitv Development - Continued' Lift station'
Councilman Rose moved to introduce Ordinance No. 892 to second reading and waive
reading in full'
Seconded by Councilman Divine
Motion carried 4-0'
IV MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS REPORTS/COMMENTS
A. 5nboba Springs Country Club request to discharge firearms' The exemp-
tion is requested for one time only because wild geese are eating the
golf course grass.
Councilman Rose moved to deny the request'
Motion was withdrawn by Councilman Rose,
Councilman Divine moved to permit the discharge of firearms on a one-time
basis under supervision of the Police Department, and in the future
something else must be done to eliminate the, -problem.
Seconded by Councilman Boykin ` ~ '
Motion carried 3-1' Councilman Rose voted no.
B. Selection of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem
Councilman Divine moved
' to continue to the meeting of January lh.
Seconded by Councilman Rose
Motion carried 3-1. Councilman Ford voted no,
C. Councilman Boykin asked about the status cf the cement batch plant
which was possibly to be in the Peacock-Radaker development area. Com-
munity Development Director McNabb Says the matter is still pending.
D. Councilman Divine mentioned Temecula becoming a city.
E. Councilman Rose, R£ Evans Street, etc.; how long will the streets in
that area be torn up? Community Development Director McNabb estimated
approximately two months. Councilman Rose suggested grading and more
watering' Staff will see that more water is put on streets, but grading
is not in the contract.
F. Mayor Ford. Reported on a letter from Jim Brady (shot in the assassin-
ation attempt on President Reagan) re the National Organization for' -the
Disabled; asking the City to participate in a partnership program which
,does not involve money -nnly time. The organization is trying to find
� i d the U. S. doing for the diSabled
out what cities and counties around e . . are .
The Mayor of Hemet has asked if Mayor Ford would be interested in meeting
on a personal basis to discuss Valley projects.
V ADJOURNMENT
Councilman Boykin moved to adjourn.
Secondedby Councilman Rose
Motion carried 4-0
Meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Helen Sherman
Deputy City Clerk
�
GLCD12
CHECK
21316*
21317*
21318*
21319*
21320*
21321*
21322*
21323*
21324*
21325*
21326*
21327*
21328*
21329*
2133O*
21331*
21332*
21333*
21334*
21335*
21336*
21337
21338
21339
21340
21341
21342
21343
21344
21345
21346
21347
21348
21349
21350
21351
21352
21353
21354
21355
21356
21357
21358
21359
21360
21361
21362
21363
21364
21365
21366
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS �~
UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK A/C 20139A^��U�K�
ISSUED TO
BLUE CROSS OF SO. CA.
BLUE CROSS OF SO~ CA,
HEALTH NET
HEALTH NET
STANDARD INS* COMPANY
PUBLIC EMP, RET, SYSTEM
PUBLIC EMP^ RET^ SYSTEM
UNITED POSTAL SERVICE
U.S. POSTMASTER
HELEN SHERMAN
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
MUNICIPAL COMP CONSULT,
CITY OF TEMECULA
TREASURER'S PETTY CASH
DEPT. OF CONSERVATION
S.J. WORKERS' COMP*
I A P M A
U.S. POSTMASTER
ARROW PRINTING
E.S. BABCOCK & SONS
BIERLY & ASSOCIATES
BOB'S LUMBER
BUDGET -RENT -A -CAR
EMPLOYMENT DEV, DEPT.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
C^J^ MC CLURE
MARGARITA VELASQUEZ
REMCO
KATHLEEN WOODS
HERMOSA HOMES
JUAN NUNEZ
WESLEY BOWMAN
VICKIE MOSCO
BAKER AUTO SERVICE
COM SER CO.
BOB CORDOVA
EASTERN MUNI^WATER DIST
EVANS TIRE CO,
STEVE FILARSKY
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
GTE
GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
HALPRIN SUPPLY CO,
HAYNES FIRE EXTG. SERV,
HEMET HEATING & COOLING
HEMET NEWS
HEMET RUBBER STAMP
HEMET SUPPLY CO -
DESCRIPTION
HEALTH INSURANCE
HEALTH INSURANCE
INSURANCE
INSURANCE
DEP^ DISABILITY INS^
RETIREMENT
RETIREMENT
UPS-F^D^
POSTAGE -WATER BILLS
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
FEDERAL TAXES
STATE TAXES
FEDERAL TAXES
NET PAYROLL
PROGRAMMING
COUNCIL CONFERENCE
TREAS^ PETTY CASH
SMIP FEES
REIMBURSE ACCOUNT
CONF^ GARCIA & RANDOLPH
REIMBURSE METER
ENVELOPES -CIVIC CENTER
LAB TESTS
QTR. SERVICE FEE
REDIMIX-WATER DEPT,
RENTAL OF VEHICLES-P~D,
UNEMP^ BENEFITS
CONSUMER DEPOSITS
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
CONSUMER DEPOSIT
REPAIRS-P.D.
REIHB. MILEAGE
UTILITIES
TIRES & REPAIRS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE
EDELBROCK PROJECT
HAINT^ P.D. & COMM, CENTER
TEL^ COMM~
HOSE-F^D,
SERVICE-F.D.
REPAIR A.C.-COMM. CENTER
ADVERTISING
STAMP -WATER DEPT^
SUPPLIES
_
AMOUNT
852^21
4~070~O8
11+936.17
103.94
2/815.92
16,788^14
16'867.13
14,99
500.00
430^O0
13/O4O.24
2,786.36
1/O48~O0
80,7O7~61
96O^O0
57.00
93^36
726,69
2/959^68
24^O0
950.00
436.34
261.00
600.00
101,B5
232^81
1,873,OO
2,417,01
28.24
12.87
23^72
35.90
396,75
50.00
11.87
31~95
38.64
75.00
65.00
672,O8
790.29
12O^0D
1'182,23
4O5^88
1,554^72
874,44
65.00
42.00
238~19
25^57
117~59
GL '12
CITY OF* SAN JACINTO
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS��' PAGE
^
21367
21368
213&9
21370
21371
21372
21373
?1374
21375
?1376
?1377
21378
21379
?138O
21381
?1382
?1383
21384
?1385
2138&
21387
21388
21389
21390
21391
21392
21393
?1394
Z1395
21396
21397
21398
21399
21400
?14O1
?1402
UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK A/C 201398
ISSUED TO
HERSHEY BUSINESS FORMS
DAVE HERTERICH
HOUSE OF QUALITY
HUBBS STATIONERY
I~C,B4O~
INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC,
LOMITA TAG CO,
AMETEK/MC CROMETER DIV,
MARDEN-SUSCO
NORTON BATTERY MFG^ CO*
PACIFIC MANAGEMENT
PAGENET
LARRY PIERCE PLUMBING
PITNEY BOWES
PRECISE LANDSCAPING
PRESS -ENTERPRISE
QWIK-CODE
MIKE READE CHEV,
SAFETY-KLEEN CORP,
SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM
CITY OF SAN JACIMTO
S°J^ BUSINESS ASSC,
SAN JACINTO ELECTRIC
SCOTSMAN MANUFACTURING
SECURITY PACIFIC BANK
SHAFFER PSYL, INSTITUTE
SHARP BUILDING SUPPLY
SO, CALIFORNIA EDISON
SO, CALIFORNIA GAS CO~
STEVE~S AUTO PARTS
SUNSHINE NURSERY
U^S^ POSTMASTER
UPSON METAL FAB^
WELCH'S UNIFORMS
XEROX CORPORATION
_
DESCRIPTION
TELEPRINTER PAPER-P,D,
WEED ABATEMENT
AUTO PARTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MEMBERSHIP-MCNA8B
COLD MIX
EQPT, MAINTENANCE
DOG TAGG
REPAIR METER
WTR~ PIPE & SUPPLIES
BATTERY-P.D.
CONTRACTOR INFO, SYSTEM
RENTAL RADIO PAGER�-^,'-
P^D,
WATER SUPPLIES `
SERVICE METER
WEED ABATEMENT
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADS
PENAL CODE-P,D,
VEHICLE PARTS-P,D^
SUPPLIES
BROOMS - SWEEPER
UTILITY BILLS
ADVANCE -MAIN ST° PROJECT
REPL^ PHOTO EYE
MONTHLY LEASE
BOND CLOSING
TESTS & INTERVIEWS-P^D^
BUILDING SUPPLIES
UTILITY
UTILITY
VEHICLE PARTS
LLMD & INSTALLATION
PERMIT FEE
BASE PLATES-F.D.
UNIFORM CLEANING
MAINTENANCE-C^C^
DATE 1/15/90
FINAL TOTAL
AMOUNT
871^05
61O^40
1,72&~O4
572,12
50^00
194~O1
5O8^27
1O7^63
70,59
2'021^41
102^96
479,B6
117°0O
12~08
198.72
2,750.00
211,85
307~79
414^94
43.75
270^03
314^33
3,843.75
82,68
854.00
9~622^28
380~00
1,017^42
2~O76^60
1'884^46
324^98
2'585^OO
60.00
13,76
736^&4
351,62
2O6'299,48
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
TREASURER'S OFFICE
TIME DEPOSIT REGISTER
Bank & Acct. No. Issued
State of California
9833794
Red.5133120
Great Western
389-600153-8 10-05-89
389-602909-1 11-13-89
389-602847-3 11-22-89
389-606242-3 09-25-89
* 389-606357-9 11-24-89
Far West Savings
013-10432-8 11-07-89
Red. 013-14016-5 11-07-89
013-16299-5 10-31-89
Home Savings
107-022763-0 12-15-89
107-022764-8 12-15-89
December 1989 Register
Federal I.D. No. 95-6000780
* EMWD Trust Account
Maturity Rate Amt. Inv. Int. This Mo.
02-20-85 Open
01-19-88 Open
01-03-90
12-13-89
01-22-89
12-22-89
01-08-90
01-10-90
01-10-90
01-03-90
8.685 2,500,000.
8.685 400,000.
8.800
8.350
8.300
8.800
8.150
8.550
8.550
8.600
01-14-90 8.000
01-14-90 8.000
50,000.
Closed
200,000.
Closed
700,000.
98,000.
98,000
98,000.
300,000.
300,000.
-0-
-0-
378.89
835.00
1,429.44
1,540.00
5,546.53
721.53
721.53
725.75
968.36
968.36
Total Invested $4,744,000 $ 13,835.39
CITY (DE- S A J A C I N TO
TREASURER'S OFFICE
TIME DEPOSIT REGISTER
CIVIC CENTER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT BONDS
Bank & Acct. No. Issued Maturity Rate Amt. Inv. Int. This Mo.
Great Western Bank
389-603896-9 10-13-89 01-10-90 8.500 1,200,000. 8,783.33
389-603897-7 11-17-89 01-02-90 8.350 1,420,000. 10,210.19
Home Savings
107-022762-2 11-30-89 02-27-89 8.250 100,000. 733.33
107-022769-7 12-12-89 01-11-90 8.100 1,200,000. 3,428.29
Gibraltar Savings
099-00095570 11-27-89 02-26-90 8.000 50,000. 388.88
Total Invested $3,970,000. $ 23,544.02
December 1989 Register
Federal I.D. No. 95-6000780
FUND
90~ DESCRIPTION
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
FINANCIAL REPORT OF ACTIVITY
FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 12/31/89
REVENUES EXPENDITURES
TO DATE TO DATE
CASH
BALANCE
10 GENERAL FUND 1,8O3,560 1'857,558 538'386
14 SEWER MAINTENANCE & DEVELOPMENT 102,297 75,987 205,658
18 WORKMANS COMPENSATION INSURANCE FND 3,824 21,894 76'853
20 LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND 10,000 94,990 13+626CR
21 GAS TAX FUND 145,736 11,575 298'354
23 LOCAL TRANSPORATION FUND ART. 8 62,887 90,909 22046CR
24 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 45'582 41'428 21,687
l5 LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND 68,843 53'512 168,309
26 INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 15000 15,000
27 INTEREST FUND 232089 232'089
28 PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND 54'354 8,438 193,337
29 HCD - HUD FUND 156,283l'.' 127'282 29'001
31 SWIMMING POOL FUND 110.40 17,218 - 565
52 PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT FUND 72,365 27,905 201'735
35 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 01 112,450 163,012 6023CR
36 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 02 62073 67,322 19'751
37 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 03 48 48CR
38 UNDERGROUND UTILITY 50 59,264
40 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 281,646 101,170 1,079,619
42 ASSESSMENT DIST 87-1 6,844 92'252 140,184
45 WATER SURCHARGE FUND 16°363 11,800 210748
47 WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 59'733 148'963 15,487
50 WATER FUND 528'7O3 397'796 392°959
S5 TRUST ACCOUNT FUND 1,095036 0208055 437,822
66 ASSETS FORFEITURE/EVIDENCE MONIES 38t221 57,314 23027
75 PAYROLL FUND 33,894
71 SOBOBA PROJECT FUND 160187
?2 SOBOBA DEBT SERVICE 5,185
y4 LOW -MOD INCOME HOUSING SOl)ODA 11,853
?6 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FUND 175,716 102,843 411085
?7 REDEVELOPMENT DEBT SERVICE FUND 4,833 249,605 50'970CR
?9 LOW -MOD INCOME HOUSING S.J. PROJECT 28,666 194,367
__________ __________
5,166,33O 5'O58,342 5,093091
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. ---------- ---------- ----------
ROSS NAMMAR
CITY TREASURER
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL THIS DEED AND, UNLESS OTHER-
WISE INSTRUCTED, THE TAX STATEMENT TO:
NAME
ADDRESS
Title Order
9458-30
EscrowNo.
A
AG
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
- -
T DEED
The undersigned declares that the documentary transfer tax is NONE
0 computed on the full value of the interest or property conveyed, or is
and is
computed on the full value less the value liens or encumbrances remaining thereon. at the time of sale. The land,
tenements or realty is located in
O unincorporated area 111 city of
FOR A VALUABI E CONSIDERATION receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
PR EQUITIES, LTD . , A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
hereby GRANT(S) to
CITY OF SAN JACINTO, A CALIFORNIA MUNICIPALITY
the following described real property in the City of
County of RIVERSIDE , State of California;
PER LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF, FOR PARK SITE.
Dated January 10, 1990
PR EQUITIES, LTD., a California
limited partnership .
.BY: THE PEACOCK-RADAKER CORPORATION,
aCalifornia corporations its •
General Partner
BY:
STEVEN R. PEACOCK, PRESIDENT
1
IT A
r..J/ i
ALL OF LOT 6, THE SOUTHERLY 350.00 FEET OF LOT 4 AND THE SOUTHERLY 350.00 FEET
OF THE WESTERLY 30.00 FEET OF LOT A "KUMLER STREET" (NOW VACATED) KUMLER RANCH
TRACT, AS SHOWN BY A MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 8 OF MAPS, PAGE 52, RECORDS OF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID LOT 6 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE CENTER LINE OF COMMONWEALTH AVENUE TAKEN AS NORTH 89°
53' 49" EAST PER RS 60/23.
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 6 WHICH IS NORTH Off° 35' 49"
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 44.00 FEET FROM THE CENTER LINE OF ESPLANADE AVENUE;
THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00° 38' 49" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 6, A
DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89° 53' 12" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 00° 38' 49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89° 53' 12" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN ESPLANADE AVENUE (FORMERLY
SIXTH STREET).
A
MEMO
GE DA
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: January 12, 1990
SUBJ: Adoption of Ordinance 887
As you recall, Hemet Unified School District requested a
continuance of Ordinance 887 until the City could address their
concerns regarding school impacts. The Council granted a two week
continuance to allow Staff to meet with the School District.
This meeting has occurred. Pursuant to Council policy we expressed
our desire to work to provide adequate schools. We reviewed the
options available by state law to finance or otherwise address
school construction, including exploring wording in the General
Plan regarding schools. This latter option we indicated should not
be rushed into, but taken in normal cycle.
Ultimately, we indicated our recommendation to the Council would
be the adoption of Ordinance 887 based on the fact there is no
applicant other than the City to discuss the matter with and the
uncertainty of the timing for the annexation.
Mr. Bailey has countered with a letter asking the Council to place
a condition in the ordinance of the zone change, related to
providing adequate school facilities.
Pursuant to law, zone changes cannot be conditioned. Therefore,
Staff does not support inclusion of such wording in Ordinance 887.
However, Staff recommends consider publicly pledging to include
HUSD in the "Project Approval Loop" and follow up with a letter to
the District with similar content.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:lr
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: January 12, 1990
SUBJ: TRACT 25021
APPLICANT: GGP Development
232 West Napa St.
Sonoma, Ca. 95476
LOCATION: Southerly side of Idyllwild Drive, east
of State Street and west of the San
Jacinto High School
When the Council and Redevelopment Agency considered Final Map
25021 at its last meeting in December, the project engineer
requested a waiver from the condition to improve both lots. This
request was denied as the Planning Commission set the condition.
The Planning Commission has now reviewed this requested waiver and
has approved a change as follows:
1. Property owner shall execute an agreement for the
construction of street improvements at such time each
parcel develops, or at such time the adjacent property
to the west installs street improvements.
As this property is within the Redevelopment Area, the
Redevelopment Agency must ratify the action. Staff has no problem
with this recommended change.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PARCEL MAP NO. 25021
BEING A SuBOIVISIDY 0, A PORTION OF FA.' LOT 38 a, TIE LAMS
fa, AC SAN .14CINTD LAAV ASSOCIATION AS SsOkPI or NAP ON FILE
IN BOW 8 PACE 357 OF At4PB REcORDS a SIN OIESO couvrr.
CALIFORNIA.
K . B . COZAD AND ASSOCIATES, INC. NOVEMBER 1989
0
C
N\. ()e ..i0, th '4.1-
6 \ vo';,71° \
\ ,e4(3'. fldite•ref'
• N,
0 \
1,(1) 46 Pi Q \
\ 7-`")/2_ .frV \.... .‘i
!3 itIV* A, \
••
„.> -> lc' • \—...
\ v•.-.&,' .. ,..., t'00..lh'
ON
- Tr"! a .3'r • el;,'
4,
•%
4'.11N;C.
NORTH
• zoo, .447 000.
OF.APNIC SCALE ,NFFB?-
scALe esto0'
®=
(
SSE:ET 2 OF2 MEETS
ENGINEER ' S NOTES
O IICICArES SET 8. IF. ELLEN TA9TE0 °R. C.E. 25159'
• IICICATES FOU0 NOMe8911- AS NOTED.
I IICICATES fecusev OAT? PER 38 8/357.
THIS A44.1, CONTAIAS .8.02 ACEES Reese.
BASIS OF BEARING
OE BASIS a, BEARING FLW rtas SLRvEr 29 TIE 0975IAE
a, IDIELNILO TRITE mow AS 9578 45' Je' 28* 3851' PO? N.B. 1O4/1J-14.
EASEMENT NOTES
EASENOIT FOR POLE LIAGS OR LAIDERCRIXISO FACILITIES IN P4V0/7
OF SOCITIERN CALIF-09VA EDISON COMPANY; IN IASTRCIIEVT NO.
115493 RECORDED DECEIVER ZSI 1957 O.R. IZTVERSITX' COWRY.
• 07-4/4
.110 r
,11
In! no. ammo, nwm. IS au/ or no.
SECTION I. OTHER PERMIT FEES
Mobilehome lot preparation
Mobilehome set-up inspection
SECTION J. MISCELLANEOUS FEES
$40.00
$80.00
Permit transfer $15.00
Storage
. 02% of valuation for all projects plus $5.00 per sheet for
all plans required to be retained indefinitely by state law.
License Verification Fee
. 05% of valuation for verification of Contractor's License,
Compensation Insurance, and Business License.
Energy Conservation Review Fee
15% of the building permit fee.
Fence Permits
15.00 per lot (up to 300 lineal feet of length. Otherwise
$25.00 per lot.)
Wall Permits
$15.00 minimum, permit based on valuation in accordance with
Section A above. Value calculated at $5.00 per square foot
of wall.
Pools and Spas
Fee based on value in accordance with Section A above.
Valuation rate is $1.00 per gallon. An additional plan check
fee required if no ICBO approval. Plan check equals 50% of
permit fee. Separate electrical, mechanical and plumbing
permits are required.
ORD. 893
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 28
EXHIBIT B
ORDINANCE 893
FEES REQUIRED BY SECTION 2 AND 10. Fee to be paid simultaneously
with the issuance of building permit.
A. WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FEE. $250.00 per residential unit
or 15 plumbing fixture units for commercial and industrial
development.
B. SEWER CONNECTION FEE. $200.00 per unit.
C. PUBLIC SAFETY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND.
1. Capital Structures. $50.00 per residential Unit or $0.01
per square foot of lot area lot being developed for
industrial or commercial uses.
2. Capital Equipment. $10.00 per residential unit or $0.01
per square foot of lot being developed for commercial and
industrial purposes.
D. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS. $3,700.00 per gross acre or $.085
per square foot of gross land area being developed.
E. SIGNALIZATION FEE. For the purpose of mitigating the impacts
of new growth on City intersections. The funds so collected
shall be set aside to install, upgrade and/or maintain traffic
signals throughout the City.
1. Single family attached or detached $150.00/unit
2. Multiple Family $100.00/unit
3. All other $2,700.00/acre
F. LIGHTING LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (light districts
only). $1.00 per lineal feet of public street frontage in
existence prior to development.
ORD. 893
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 29
E::IBIT C
ORDINANCE 893
PUBLIC WORKS FEES D
WHEN IMPROVEMENTS ARE NEEDED
Inspection Fees Permit Fee Inspection Fee
1. Residential Driveway 15.00 - . 10.00
2. Commercial Driveway 15.00 15.00
3. Excavation Permit 15.00 $25/250 ft.
within unpaved section
of City right-of-way
4. Excavation peLmit
within paved section
of City right-of-way
15.00
5. Encroachment on or over 15.00
a City right-of-way
without excavation
6. Curbs and Gutters
7. Sidewalks
8. Utility Service Connec-
tions involving open
cuts across streets
15.00
15.00
15.00
9. Utility Service Connec- 15.00
tions with no open cut
10. Pot hole Permit 15.00
11. Paving 15.00
12. Miscellaneous 15.00
ORD. 893
$25/150 ft.
15.00/encroachment
2 1/2% of estimate
15.00 minimum
2 1/2% of estimate
15.00 minimum
40.00 each crossing
25.00 each crossing
15.00 each
2 1/2% of estimate
15.00 minimum
2 1/2% of estimate
15.00 minimum
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 30
Other Fees
13. Subdivisions
Plan Check
Inspection
14. Street Trees
15. Signs
16. Curb paint
17. Fire Hydrant & Blue Dot
2 1/2% of preliminary
engineers estimate
2% of final engineers
estimate plus
additional fees for
signs, painting,
street trees, etc.
250.00 each
175.00 each
3.00/ft. minimum 75.00
5 0 . 0 0 per
hydrant/200.00 minimum
Note: For non -subdivision improvements, 1% of the 2 1/2% fee shall
be submitted as a plan check fee with the submission of plans.
ORD. 893
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 31
1989 WATER RATE STATUS REPORT
BUDGETED EXPENDITURES $ 664,744.00
AVERAGE MONTHLY REVENUE REQUIRED TO MEET BUDGETED REVENUES $ 55,395.00
AVERAGE (12Month) REVENUE 1988-1989 $55,889.29
PROJECTED REV AMOUNT ACTUAL REV. DIFFERENCE
MONTH REV. 1988-89 1989-90 BILLED 1989-90 BETWEEN
PROJECTED
AND ACTUAL
July $48,060.27 $55,000.00 $70,342.27 $61,235.38 $ 6,235.38
August $86,535.78 $96,000.00 $95,597.20 $99,547.63 $ 3,547.63
September 880,460.41 $88,000.00 $93,686.69 $80,649.26- $(7,350.74)
October $69,351.12 $70,000.00 $78,249.74 $81,096.63 $11,096.63
November $56,184.07 $60,000.00 $65,877.44 $66,644.86 $ 6,644.86
December $54,261.19 $55,000.00 $48,679.96 $48,603.34 $(6,396.66)
January $40,789.62 $42,000.00 $47,803.81 $ $
February $36,745.84 $35,000.00 $ $
March $40,588.22 $40,000.00 $ $ $
April $40,208.44 $40,000.00 $ $ $
May $57,863.04 $59,000.00 $ $ $
June $59,623.43 $63,000.00 $ $ $
AVERAGE $55,889.29 $58,583.33 $71,462.44 $72,962.85 $ 2,296.18
BUDGETED EXPENDITURES $ 664,744.00
PROJECTED REVENUES WATER SALES $ 703,000.00
DIFFERENCE 38,256.00
ACTUAL REVENUES AFTER 6 MONTHS $ 437,777.10
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PROJECTED REVENUES AND $ 13,777.10
ACTUAL REVENUE
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Ross S. Nammar, City Manager
SUBJ: Edelbrock
DATE: 01-12-90
To keep you abreast of our progress on the Edelbrock Foundry
Project, please be advised that the grading at the site
is completed.
The third, and final, plan corrections were submitted on
January 8, 1990 and the final plan should be approved
and building permits issued the week of the 15th so that
construction can commence.
As of date, the California Industrial Development Commission
has received two (2) letters expressing strong support
of the project and bond issuance from Senator Presley and
Assemblyman Kelley.
On January 11, we had a meeting with the Edelbrock repre-
sentatives, our financial consultant and representatives
of the Bank of America and came to a tentative agreement
that the Bank of America would be providing, on behalf
of Edelbrock, an Enhancement Letter of Credit as security
for the bonds.
On January 15 and 16, I will be up in San Francisco to
finalize the application for submittal to Sacramento,
prior to the deadline of January 24, 1990 at 4:00 p.m.
The meeting participants are the financial counsel, bond
counsel, underwriter counsel, representatives of legal
counsel for Edelbrock and a representative from the
California Industrial Development Advisory Commission.
Respectfully submitted,
ROSS S. NAMMAR
nr
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Ross S. Nammar, City Manager
SUBJ: Update Industrial Injuries
DATE: 1-12-90
As predicted and as shared with you confidentially by
date of January 10, 1990, Attorney Ronald Miller served
notice on the City of filing a worker's compensation
claim on behalf of Kimberley R. Perry, our Clerk Typist
at the City Yard. The claim alleges a continuous trauma.
With regard to Police Officer Gaskin, still off duty on
4850, and I am sure she will utilize her rights under
the Labor Code with a disability retirement claim to
follow in ten months. She received a letter to sue from
the State Fair Housing and Employment Opportunity Commission
for her alleged sexual harassment. She has attained
services of Attorney Schaeffer from Newport Beach and
it has been confirmed that settlement of demand is $100,000
for her sexual harassment claim only.
With regard to Housel's claim of sexual harassment, as
Council directed we offered $15,000 to settle and the
offer was rejected with a counter offer to settle for
$75,000.
Another surprise to all of us, another worker's compen-
sation claim has been filed for an injury that occurred
September 3, 1987, to Officer Ballard, where he was
invovled in a traffic accident while in pursuit in
Beaumont. The outcome of this claim is to early to
evaluate and we will keep you posted.
Respectfully submitted,
ROSS S. NAM
nr
7. For the installation or relocation of each boiler or
compressor to and including three horsepower, or each
absorption system to and including 100,000
Btu/h 9.00
8. For the installation or relocation of each boiler or
compressor over three horsepower to and including 15
horsepower, or each absorption system over 100,000 Btu/h
and including 500,000 Btu/h 16.50
9. For the installation or relocation of each boiler or
compressor over 15 horsepower to and including 30
horsepower, or each absorption system over 500,000 Btu/h
to and including 1,000,000 Btu/h 22.50
10. For the installation or relocation of each boiler or
compressor over 30 horsepower to and including 50
horsepower, or for each absorption system over 1,000,000
Btu/h to and including 1,750,000 Btu/h 33.50
11. For the installation or relocation of each boiler or
refrigeration compressor over 50 horsepower, or each
absorption system over 1,750,000 Btu/h 56.00
12. For each air -handling unit to and including 10,000 cubic
feet per minute, including ducts attached 6.50
Note: This fee shall not apply to an air -handling unit
which is a portion of a factory -assembled appliance,
cooling unit, evaporative cooler or absorption unit for
which a permit is required elsewhere in this code.
13. For each air -handling unit over 10,000 cfm 11.00
14. For each evaporative cooler other than portable
type 6.50
15. For each ventilation fan connected to a single
duct 4.50
16. For each ventilation system which is not a portion of any
heating or air-conditioning system authorized by a
permit 6.50
17. For the installation of each hood which is served by
mechanical exhaust, including the ducts for such
hood 6.50
ORD. 893
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 23
18. For the installation or relocation of each domestic -type
incinerator 11.00
19. For the installation or relocation of each commercial or
industrial -type incinerator 45.00
20. For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by
this code but not classed in other appliance categories,
or for which no other fee is listed in this
code 6.50
Other Inspections and Fees:
1. Inspections outside of normal business
hours $45. 00 per hour
(minimum charge - two hours)
2. Reinspection fees $30.00 per hour
3. Inspections for which no fee is
specifically indicated $30.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one-half hour)
4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or
revisions to approved plans $30.00 per hour
SECTION D. PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
Permit Issuance
1. For the issuance of each permit $15.00
2. For issuing each supplemental permit 4.50
Unit Fee Schedule (in addition to 1 or 2 above)
1. For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixture on
one trap (including water, drainage piping, and backflow
protection therefor) 6.00
2. For each building sewer and each trailer park
sewer 15.00
3. Rainwater systems per drain (inside
building) 6.00
ORD. 893
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 24
4. For each cesspool (where peLfflitted) 22.50
5. For each private sewage disposal system 45.00
6. For each water heater and/or vent 7.50
7. For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor
including its trap and vent, excepting kitchen -type
grease interceptors functioning as fixture
traps , 12.00
8. For installation, alteration, or repair of water piping
and/or water -treating equipment,
each 3.00
9. For repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping, each
fixture 3.00
10. For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter,
including backflow protection devices therefor9.00
11. For atmospheric -type vacuum breakers not included in Item
2:
1 to 5 7.50
over 5, each 1.50
12. For each backflow protective device other than
atmospheric -type vacuum breaker:
2 inches and smaller 7.50
over 2 inches 15.00
13. For each gas piping system of one to four
outlets 3.00
14. For each gas piping system of five or more outlets, per
outlet 0.75
Other Inspections and Fees:
1. Inspections outside of normal business
hours $45.00 per hour
(minimum charge - two hours)
ORD. 893
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 25
2. Reinspection fees $30.00 per hour
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically
indicated $30. 00 per hour
(minimum charge - one-half hour)
4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or
revisions to approved plans ..............$30.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one-half hour)
- -
SECTION E. ELEVATOR PERMIT FEES
New Installation:
Passenger or freight elevator, escalator, moving walk:
Up to and including $40,000 of valuation $55.00
Over $40.00 of valuation - $55.00 plus $1.00 for each $1,000
or fraction thereof over $40.00
Dumbwaiter or private residence elevator:
Up to and including $10,000 of valuation $15.00
Over $10,000 of valuation - $15.00 plus $1.00 for each $1,000
or fraction thereof over $10,000
Major Alterations:
Fees for major alterations shall be as set forth in Exhibit
"A" above.
Installation fees include charges for the first year's annual
inspection fee and charges for electrical equipment on the
conveyance side of the disconnect switch.
SECTION F. ELEVATOR ANNUAL CERTIFICATES OF INSPECTION FEES
For each elevator $25.00
For each escalator or moving walk $15.00
For each commercial dumbwaiter $10.00
ORD. 893 JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 26
(Each escalator or moving walk unit powered by one motor shall
be considered as a separate escalator or moving walk.)
SECTION G. GRADING PLAN REVIEW FEES
Grading plan review 35% of permit fee.
Other fees:
Additional plan review required by changes, additions or
revisions to approved plans $30.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one-half hour)
SECTION H. GRADING PERMIT FEES
50 cubic yards or less $15.00
51 to 100 cubic yards $22.50
101 to 1,000 cubic yards - $22.50 for the first 100 cubic yards
plus $10.50 for each additional 1,000 cubic yards or fraction
thereof.
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards - $198.00 for the first 10,000 cubic
yards, plus $40.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or
fraction thereof.
100,001 cubic yards or more - $562.50 for the first 100,000 cubic
yards, plus $22.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yard or
fraction thereof.
Other Inspections and Fees:
1. Inspections outside of normal business
hours $45.00 per hour
(minimum charge - two hours)
2. Reinspection fees $30.00 per hour
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically
indicated $30.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one-half hour)
ORD. 893
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 27
ORD. 893
replanted upon the completion of subsequent
projects.
f. Bonding. A bond for all projects involving
more than four structures shall be filed with
the City by the developer at the time that the
landscaping plan is approved.
g Final Planting Inspection. A final planting
inspection shall be required for all building
sites requiring planting. For building sites
not requiring a performance bond, the final
planting inspection shall be approved prior to
the building permit final inspection. Any
required irrigation system and all planting
shall be installed at the time of the final
planting inspection. A functional test of the
irrigation system may be required. For
building sites requiring a performance bond,
slope certification required by the next
subsection shall be approved prior to the
building permit final inspection. The final
planting inspection shall be performed at the
end of the one year bond period.
h. Slope Verification. A site inspections shall
be performed by the responsible landscape
architect to assure compliance with the
approved plans and to perform a functional test
of the sprinkler system. Said landscape
architect shall verify in writing to the
Building Director that the soils, additives,
and amendments, weed control, planting of the
slopes and the installation of the irrigation
system comply to the approved plans and to all
the provisions of this section. Verification
to contain a statement as to the grow stock
vitality.
i. Landscape and Irrigation Plan/Plan-Checking
Fee. Before accepting a set of plans and
specifications for checking, the Building and
Safety Department shall collect a plan checking
fee. The amount of the plan checking fee for
landscape and irrigation plan shall be as set
forth below:
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 10
PLAN CHECK FEES
1 to 4 lots $5.00 per lot
5 or more lots $20 + $1.00 per lot
Landscaping Permit Fees. A fee for each
landscaping permit shall be paid to the
Building and Safety Department as set forth
below:
LANDSCAPING PERMIT FEES
1 to 4 lots $5.00 per lot
5 or more lots $20 + $2.00 per lot
Section 4. All buildings for which permits valued in excess
of $1500.00 are issued shall, prior to final inspection, paint with
white paint on dark background on the front curb face the address
of said building. Numbers shall be a minimum of 3" high.
The owner of all building in the City shall be responsible for
installing the address on the mailbox and on the structure itself.
Such numbers shall be a minimum of 3" tall and on a contrasting
background.
Section 5. The Uniform Plumbing Code 1988 Edition as adopted
by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical
Officials including the appendix therein is hereby adopted as part
of the building Code of the City of San Jacinto (copies of which
are on file at the office of the City Clerk) except as amended
below:
A. Part 1, Administration, commencing with Section 10.1, is
hereby deleted.
Section 6. The Uniform Mechanical Code 1988 Edition including
the appendix thereof and the standards therein and the annual
supplement as adopted by the International Conference of Building
Officials is hereby adopted as a part of the Building Code of the
City of San Jacinto (copies of which are on file in the office of
the City Clerk) except as amended below:
A. Chapter 3 is hereby deleted.
ORD. 893
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 11
Section 8. The Uniform Housing Code 1988 Edition as adopted
by the International Conference of Building Officials is hereby
adopted as the Housing Standards of the City of San jacinto (copies
of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk).
Section 9. The Uniform Code of the Abatement of Dangerous
Buildings 1988 Edition as adopted by the International Conference
of Building Officials is hereby adopted as a part of the Building
Code of the City of San Jacinto (copies of which are on file in the
office of the City Clerk).
Section 10. The Uniform Sign Code 1988 Edition as adopted by
the International Conference of Building Officials is hereby
adopted as a part of the Building Code of the City of San Jacinto
(copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk).
Section 11. Developers Fees. Pursuant to Section 2, certain
developers fees are required to be paid prior to the issuance of
a Building Permit. The purpose of these fees is described in
detail below. The minimum fee is stated in Exhibit "B" attached.
These fees may be amended from time to time by a REsolution of the
City Council of the City of San Jacinto.
A. Water Capital Improvement Fund
For the upgrade and replacement of existing wells,
reservoirs, booster systems and distribution systems of
the Water Department.
B. Public Safety Capital Improvement Fund
1. Structures. For the acquisition and construction
of public safety related buildings, grounds and
fixtures.
2. Equipment. For the acquisition of capital equipment
for public safety purposes including vehicles,
radios, furniture and other equipment with a cost
exceeding $150.00.
C. Storm Drain Improvement Fund
ORD. 893
For the development of the Master Drainage Plan and other
storm drain systems.
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 12
D. Traffic Signalization Fund
For the construction of traffic safety improvements such
as traffic signals, warning lights, and signal
coordinating equipment.
E. Sewer Connection Fund
For upgrade and replacement of the sewer collection
system.
F. Lighting and Landscape District Fund
For the establishment, maintenance, and administration
of lighting and landscape maintenance districts.
Section 12. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the
City Council that sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses and
phrases of the ordinance and the code and codes hereby adopted are
severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or
section of this ordinance of the code or codes hereby adopted shall
be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid by the valid
judgement or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such
unconstitutionality or invalidity shall not affect any of the
remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of
this ordinance or the code hereby adopted.
Section 13. The Police Chief and officers of the Police
Department, the City Attorney, the Building Official, the Community
Development Director, the Planning Director, the Code Enforcement
Officers, the Associate Planner and all City Officials charged with
the issuance of licenses and permits shall enforce the provisions
of this ordinance, and are authorized to issue citation for
violation thereof.
A. No Permits To Be Issued. No permit of any nature shall
be issued under the provisions of this ordinance which
is not in accordance with the provisions of this
ordinance. Any permit issued contrary to the provisions
of this ordinance shall be void and of no effect.
B. Legal Procedure. Any building or structure erected or
maintained, any grading, or any use of property contrary
to the provisions of this ordinance shall be and the same
is hereby declared to be unlawful and a public nuisance
and the City Attorney shall immediately commence action
ORD. 893
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 13
or actions, proceeding or proceedings for the abatement,
removal and enjoinment thereof, in the manner provided
by law; and shall take such other steps, and shall apply
to such court or courts as may have jurisdiction to grant
such relief as will abate or removal of such building,
structure or use and restrain and enjoin any person from
setting up, erecting or maintaining such building or
structure, grading, or using any property contrary to
the provisions of this ordinance. It shall be the right
and the duty of every citizen to participate and assist
the City officials in the enforcement of this ordinance.
C. Remedies. All remedies provided for herein shall be
cumulative and not exclusive. The conviction and
punishment of any person hereunder shall not relieve such
person from the responsibility of correcting prohibited
buildings structures or improvements, nor prevent the
enforced correction or removal thereof.
Section 14. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper
of general circulation printed and published in the County of
Riverside, State of California.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the said City Council on
the l6th day of January 1990.
MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
Council on the l6th day of January 1990 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
ORD. 893
Mayor
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 14
CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO
I, Helen Sherman, Deputy City Clerk of the City of San
Jacinto, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of
Ordinance No. 893 duly adopted by the City Council of the City of
San jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the 16th day of
January 1990.
WITNESS my hand and official seal of -the City of San Jacinto
this 16th day of January 1990.
Deputy City Clerk
ORD. 893
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 15
EXHIBIT A
ORDINANCE 893
SECTION A. BUILDING PERMIT FEES
Value Fee
$1.00 to $500.o0 $15.o0
$501.00 to $2,000.00 $15.00 for the first $500.00 plus
$2.00 for each additional $100.00 or
fraction thereof, to and including
$2,000.00
$2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $45.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus
$9.00 for each additional $1,000.00
or fraction thereof, to and including
$25,000.00
$25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $252.00 for the first $25,000.00 plus
$6.50 for each additional $1,000.00
or fraction thereof, to and including
$50,000.00
$50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $414.50 for the first $50, 000. 00 plus
$4.50 for each additional $1,000.00
or fraction thereof, to and including
$100,000.00
$100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $639.50 for the first $100,000.00
plus $3.50 each additional $1,000.00
or fraction thereof
$500,001.00 to
$1,000,000.00
$1,000,001.00 and up
ORD. 893
$2,039.50 for the first $500,000.00
plus $3.00 for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and
including $1,000,000.00
$3,539.50 for the first $1,000,000.00
plus $2.00 for each additional
$1,000.00 or fraction thereof
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 16
Other Inspections and Fees:
1. Inspections outside of normal
business hours $45.00 per hour
(minimum charge - two hours)
2. Reinspection fees $30.00 per hour
3. Inspections for which no fee is
specifically indicated $30.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one-half hour)
4. Additional plan review required by
changes, additions or revisions to
approved plans $30.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one-half hour)
SECTION B. ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES
Permit Issuance
For issuing each permit $15.00
For issuing each supplemental permit $4.50
System Fee Schedule
(Note: The following do not include permit -issuing fee.)
New Buildings
The following fees shall include all wiring and electrical
equipment in or on each building, or other electrical
equipment on the same premises constructed at the same time.
For new Multi -family residential buildings (apartments
and condominiums) having three or more living units not
including the area of garages, carports and other
noncommercial automobile storage areas constructed at the
same time and all nonresidential buildings same time and
all nonresidential buildings except warehouses, per
square foot .03
ORD. 893
For new single- and two-family residential buildings not
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 17
including the area of garages, carports, and other minor
accessory buildings constructed at the same time, per
square foot .035
Warehouses - per square foot .01
For other types of residential occupancies and
alterations, additions and modifications to existing
residential buildings, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE.
Private Swimming Pools
For new private, residential, in -ground, swimming pools
for singe -family and Multi -family occupancies including
a complete system of necessary branch circuit wiring,
bonding, grounding, underwater lighting, water pumping
and other similar electrical equipment directly related
to the operation of a swimming pool, each 30.00
For other types of swimming pools, therapeutic
whirlpools, spas and alterations to existing swimming
pools, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE.
Carnivals and Circuses
Carnivals, circuses, or other traveling shows or exhibitions
utilizing transportable -type rides, booths, displays and
attractions.
For electric generators and electrically
driven rides, each 15.00
For mechanically driven rides and
walk-through attractions or displays
having electric lighting, each 4.50
For a system of area and booth lighting,
each 4.50
For permanently installed, rides, booths, displays and
attractions, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE.
Temporary Power Service
For temporary service power pole pedestal including all
pole or pedestal -mounted receptacle outlets and
ORD. 893
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 18
appurtenances, each 15.00
(per pole containing electrical equipment)
For a temporary distribution system and temporary
lighting and receptacle outlets for construction sites,
decorative light, Christmas tree sales lots, firework
stands, etc., each 7.50
Unit fee schedule - To be used on other than new buildings and as
noted above.
(Note: The following do not include permit issuing fee.
Receptacle, Switch and Lighting Outlets
For receptacle, switch, lighting or other outlets at
which current is used or controlled, except services,
feeders and meters.
First 20, each .75
Additional outlets, each .45
Note: For multi -outlet assemblies, each 5 feet or
fraction thereof may be considered as one outlet.
Lighting Fixtures
For lighting fixtures, sockets or other lamp -holding
devices
First 20, each .75
Additional fixtures, each .45
For pole or platform -mounted lighting fixtures,
each .75
For theatrical -type lighting fixtures or assemblies,
each .75
Residential Appliances
ORD. 893
For fixed residential appliances or receptacle outlets
for same, including wall -mounted electric ovens; counter -
mounted cooking tops; electric ranges, self-contained
room, console, or through -wall air conditioners; space
heaters; food waste grinders; dishwashers; washing
machines; water heaters; clothes dryers; or other motor-
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 19
operated appliances not exceeding one horsepower (HP) in
rating, each 3.00
Note: For other types of air conditioners and other
motor -driven appliances having larger electrical ratings,
see Power Apparatus.
Nonresidential Appliances
For residential appliances and self-contained factory -
wired, nonresidential appliances not exceeding one
horsepower (HP), kilowatt (KW), or kilovolt -ampere (KVA),
rating including medical and dental devices; food,
beverage, and ice cream cabinets; illuminated show cases;
drinking fountains; vending machines; laundry machines;
or other similar types of equipment, each........ 3.00
Note: For other types of air conditioners and other
motor -driven appliances having larger electrical ratings,
see Power Apparatus.
Power Apparatus
ORD. 893
For motors, generators, transformers, rectifiers,
synchronous converter, capacitors, industrial heating,
air conditioners and heat pumps, cooking or baking
equipment and other apparatus, as follows:
Rating in horsepower (HP), kilowatts (KW), kilovolt -
amperes (KVA), or kilovolt -amperes -reactive (KVAR):
Up to and including 1, each 3.00
Over 1 and not over 10, each 7.50
Over 10 and not over 50, each 15.00
Over 50 and not over 100, each 30.00
Over 100, each 45.00
Note:
1. For equipment or appliances having more than one
motor, transformer, heater, etc., the sum of the combined
ratings may be used.
2. These fees include all switches, circuit breakers,
contactors, thermostats, relays and other directly
related control equipment.
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 20
Busways
For trolley and plug -in -type busways, each 100 feet
or fraction thereof 4.50
Note: An additional fee will be required for lighting
fixtures, motors and other appliances that are connected
to trolley and plug -in -type busways. No fee is required
for portable tools.
Signs, Outline Lighting and Marquees
For signs, outline lighting systems or marquees supplied
from one branch circuit, each 15.00
Services
For additional branch circuits within the same sign,
outline lighting system or marquee, each 3.00
For services of 600 volts or less and not over 200
amperes in rating, each 18.50
For services of 600 volts or less and over 200 amperes
to 1000 amperes in rating, each 37.50
For services over 600 volts or over 1000 amperes in
rating, each 75.00
Miscellaneous Apparatus, Conduits and Conductors
For electrical apparatus, conduits and conductors for
which a permit is required but for which no fee is herein
set forth 11.00
Note: This fee is not applicable when a fee is paid for
one or more services, outlets, fixtures, appliances,
power apparatus, busways, signs or other equipment.
Other Inspections and Fees:
1. Inspections outside of normal
business hours $45.00 per hour
(minimum charge - two hours)
2. Reinspection fees $30.00 per hour
ORD. 893 JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 21
3. Inspections for which no fee is
specifically indicated $30.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one-half hour)
4. Additional plan review required
by changes, additions or revisions
to approved plans $30.00 per hour
SECTION C. MECHANICAL PERMITS FEES
Permit Issuance
1. For the issuance of each permit $15.00
2. For issuing each supplemental permit
4.50
Unit Fee Schedule
1. For the installation or relocation of each forced -air or
gravity -type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents
attached to such appliance, up to and including 1000,000
Btu/h 9.00
2. For the installation or relocation of each forced -air or
gravity -type furnace or burner, including ducts and vents
attached to such appliance over 100,000
Btu/h 11.00
3. For the installation or relocation of each floor furnace,
including vent 9.00
4. For the installation or relocation of each suspended
heater, recessed wall heater or floor -mounted unit
heater 9.00
5. For the installation, relocation or replacement of each
appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance
permit 4.50
6. For the repair of, alteration of, or addition to each
heating appliance, refrigeration unit, cooling unit,
absorption unit. or each heating, cooling, absorption,
or evaporative cooling system, including installation of
controls regulated by this code 9.00
ORD. 893
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 22
EXHIBIT "["
P.U.D. 5-89
FLOOD ZONE
I
COTTONWOOD
COMM 0
SEVENTH
STREET r,j
z
<
a—e
A
•. POTENTIALLY ACTIVE FAULTS
>—
( defined boundary of Special Studies Zone
•
1
•
1/
EXHIBIT "F"
P.U.D. 5-89
SEISMIC
UJ
. • .•i'
Where fault is approximately located
— — — — where fault is inferred
..1.10
re
R-1, Sin le Family
J30
.7R A ofc-oir
R-3, Multi Family
R A 010-00r
C)
0.1 AA.e.
POR
11.
R-1, Single Family
I
0
M-1, Light Industrial/
R-1 (PUD)
1"Rx0/0-0CW
A, Agricultural
SEVENTH
STREET
EXHIBIT "G"
I; r
PUD 5-89
PROPOSED ZONING
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
8
9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
ORDINANCE NO. 896
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMEMT 5-89
AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Ordinance 340 is hereby amended
by establishing a Planned Unit Overlay Zone.
Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the
City of San Jacinto shown on the attached maps marked
Exhibit "A" made a part hereof, is hereby changed from
R-1, Single Family Residential to R-1, Planned Unit
Development.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be
published in the Hemet News, a newspaper of general
circulation printed and published in the County of
Riverside, State of California.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of said City
council on the 16th day of January 1990.
MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
the said City Council on the day of January 1990 by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
AllEST:
Deputy City Clerk
Mayor
CERTIFICATE
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy
of Ordinance No. 896 duly adopted by the City Council of
the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof
held the day of January 1990.
Deputy City Clerk
R-1, Sin le Family
69!-052
530
TPA 010-007
R-3,
T
4 OtG
Multi Family
R-1 (PUD)
•
SEVENTH
EXHIBIT "A"
POR FAR,
R-1, Single Family
It.
r*re
0 -
I
M-1, Light Industrial/
rit.e010 OS
pc.
A, Agricultura
STREET
PUD 5-89
PROPOSED ZONING
AG
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: January 12, 1990
SUBJ: ORDINANCE NO. 893
REGULATING CONSTRUCTION ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THE
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AND THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS
BUILDINGS
State law requires the city, from time to time, to adopt revised
editions of the uniform construction codes. Ordinance 893 is the
document which repeals the previous codes and adopts the new codes.
This is advertised as a public hearing, because state law requires
any increase in permit fees to be considered at a public hearing.
In summary the fee revisions are as follows:
1) The fees for after hour inspection and special plan check
were increased to more accurately reflect the city
incurred costs.
2
3
The valuation rate for walls and pools and spas was
increased to more accurately reflect the actual
construction costs.
The public works plan check fee for subdivisions was
increased to cover the cost of plan check the minimum
inspection fee for public works inspection was increased.
Staff recommends the approval of Ordinance 893 at the conclusion
of public hearing.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
ORDINANCE 893
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
DETERMINING CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT FEES, REGULATING ALL PHASES
OF CONSTRUCTION ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AND THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF
WAY AND REGULATING PROCEDURES FOR ABATING DANGEROUS BUILDINGS
BY ADOPTING THE UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 1988 EDITION,
UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 1988 EDITION, UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE 1988
EDITION, UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE 1988 EDITION, UNIFORM HOUSING
CODE 1988 EDITION, UNIFORM CODE FOR THE. ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS
BUILDINGS 1988 EDITION AND THE UNIFORM=SIGN CODE 1988 EDITION
AND REPEALING ORDINANCE 816 EXCEPT SECTION 7
The City Council of the City of San Jacinto does ordain as follows:
Section 1. Ordinance 816, except Section 7, adopting the 1987
National Electrical Code, is hereby repealed.
Section 2. The Uniform Administrative Code 1988 edition,
including the annual supplement as adopted by the International
Conference of Building Officials is hereby adopted as part of the
Building Code of the City of San jacinto (copies of which are on
file in the office of the City Clerk) with the following
modifications:
A. The first paragraph of Section 104 (f) is hereby amended
as follows:
Moved buildings and temporary buildings - Buildings,
structures, and accessories shall not be moved into this
jurisdiction on a permanent basis.
B. Section 301 (a) is renumbered to 301 (a) 1. Section 301
(a) 2. is hereby created as follows:
No person, firm, or corporation shall excavate,
construct, or maintain any structure, or facilities
within the public right of way without first obtaining
an excavation and/or encroachment permit, as well as a
public works permit, as applicable.
C. Section 301 (b) 1.A is hereby amended to read as follows:
ORD. 893
One story detached accessory buildings used as tool and
storage sheds, play houses and similar uses, provided the
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 1
floor area does not exceed 100 square feet.
D. Section 301 (b) 1.B is hereby amended to read as follows:
Fences not over three feet in height. (All walls shall
require a permit.)
E. The first paragraph of Section 303 (d) is hereby amended
as follows:
Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building Official
under the provisions of the Technical Codes shall -expire
by limitation and become null and void if the building
or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within
180 days from the date of such permit, or if the building
or work authorized by such permit is suspended or
abandoned at anytime. Suspension or abandonment shall
be constituted by more than 180 days between documented
requests for inspection. Before such work can be
recommenced a new permit shall be first obtained so to
do and the fee therefore shall be one half the amount
required for a new permit for such work provided no
changes have been made or will be made in the original
plans and specifications for such work; and provided
further that such suspension or abandonment has not
exceeded one year. In order to renew action on a permit
after expiration the permittee shall pay a new full
permit fee.
F. Section 301 (b) is amended as follows:
ORD. 893
The fee for each permit shall be as set forth in Exhibit
A attached. In addition to construction fees listed in
Exhibit A, fees described in section 11 and listed in
Exhibit B shall be paid simultaneously with the issuance
of a building permit unless other arrangements are made.
The determination of value or valuation under any of the
provisions of these codes shall be made by the Building
Official. The value to be used in computing the building
permit and building plan review fees shall be the total
value of all construction work for which the permit is
issued as well as all finish work; painting, roofing,
electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning,
elevators, fire extinguishing systems and any other
permit and equipments. Fees listed in exhibit C shall
be paid as specified for public and private improvements.
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 2
G. Section 304 (c) is amended as follows:
When a plan or other data are required to be submitted
by Subsection (c) of Section 302 a plan review fee shall
be paid at the time of submitting plans and
specifications for review. Said plan review fee for
buildings or structures shall be 65% of the building
permit fee shown in Exhibit A.
The plan review fees for electrical, mechanical and
plumbing work shall be equal to 25% of the total_permit
fee for each as set forth in Exhibit A.
The plan review fee for grading work shall be 35% of the
grading permit fee.
The plan review fee for public and private improvements
shall be as stated in Exhibit C.
Where plans are incomplete or changed so as to require
additional plan review an additional plan review fee
shall be charged at the rate shown in Exhibit A.
H. Section 304 (e) 2 is amended as follows:
Fee. An investigation fee in addition to the permit fee
shall be collected whether or not a permit is then or
subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be
equal to the amount of the permit fee required by this
Code. The minimum investigation fee shall be the same
as the minimum fee set forth in Exhibit A. The payment
of such investigation fee shall not exempt any person
from compliance with all other provisions of either this
Code or the Technical Codes nor from any penalty
prescribed by law.
1. The forth paragraph of Section 305 (h) is amended to read
as follows:
ORD. 893
To obtain a reinspection the applicant shall file an
application therefore in writing upon a form furnished
for that purpose and pay the reinspection fee in
accordance with Exhibit A.
Section 3. The Uniform Building Code 1988 Edition
including chapters one (except the first paragraph of
Section 104 (e)) and two, excluding chapter three, and
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 3
ORD. 893
including the appendix thereof and including the
standards referred to in Section 6001 therein and
including the annual supplement as adopted by the
International Conference of Building Officials (copies
of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk) is
hereby adopted as a part of the Building Code of the City
of San Jacinto with the following modifications:
A. Chapter three and appendix chapter 53 are hereby
deleted.
B. Section 104 (c) second paragraph is hereby amended
as follows;
Any change in the use or occupancy of any existing
building or structure should comply with Section
502 of this Code and Section 308 of the Uniform
Administrative Code.
C. Section 502 second paragraph is amended as follows:
No change in the character of occupancy of the
building shall be made without a Certificate of
Occupancy as required by Section 308 of the uniform
Administrative Code. The Building official may
issue a Certificate of Occupancy pursuant to the
intent of the above exception without certifying
that the building complies with all provisions of
this Code.
D. Section 2516 (f), shall be amended to read as
follows:
Draft stops shall be placed in all stud wall
partitions including furred spaces so that maximum
dimension between horizontal framing members is not
over 6 feet and in the following locations:
E. Section 3203, first paragraph is amended to read as
follows:
The roof covering on any structure regulated by this
Code shall be as specified in table 32-A and as
classified in Section 3204, except roof coverings
on buildings located in a designated fire hazard
area shall be rated as Class A.
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 4
ORD. 893
F. Section 3802 (b) is deleted in its entirety and
replaced as follows:
Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems. Approved
automatic fire sprinkler systems shall be installed
and maintained in operable condition as specified
in this section in the following location:
1. All non-residential structures in excess of one
story in height.
2. All basement exceeding 1500 sq. ft.
3. All structures with a roof deck height
exceeding 45 feet above grade.
4. All A occupancies exceeding 6000 sq. ft., an
occupant load in excess of 150 persons, or an
occupant load in excess of 50 person above the
first floor.
5. All B occupancies in excess of 12,000 sq. ft.
on the first floor.
6. All E occupancies in excess of 6000 sq. ft. on
the first floor.
7. All H-1 and H-2 occupancies larger than 1500
sq. ft. or when flammable and combustible
liquids are stored or handled in excess of
those allowed by Table 9-A of the Uniform
Building Code or any combination of flammable
liquids exceeding 240 gallons, and all pain
spray booths and rooms.
8. All H-3 and H-4 occupancies in excess of 3000
sq. ft.
9. All H-6 occupancies.
10. All I occupancies.
11. All R-1 occupancies more than two stories in
height or housing more than 50 units in a
structure.
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 5
ORD. 893
12. All buildings which exceed 1500 sq. ft. without
at least 20 sq. ft. of opening in each 50
lineal feet of wall. Openings shall have a
minimum dimension of 30" and shall be
accessible to the Fire Department from the
outside without obstruction. Where openings
are only on one side, the opposite side shall
not exceed 75 ft. from the opening.
G. Section 7012 of the appendix of the Uniform Building
Code is amended by adding new Subsection (q:
Parking lots within the City of San Jacinto shall
comply with the City of San Jacinto Public Works
Standards and Specifications and Ordinance 340.
Permit fees for said parking lots shall be in
accordance with Exhibit C.
H. Subsection (a) of Section 7013 of The Uniform
Building Code is amended to read:
Erosion Control - Landscaping.
1. Slopes. The faces of cut and fill slopes
shall be prepared and maintained to
control erosion and provide stability.
Where cut slopes are not subject to
erosion due to erosion -resistant character
of materials, such production may be
omitted. Unless otherwise recommended in
the approved soil engineering or
engineering geology report, cut and fill
slopes shall be planted in accordance with
this Section. The protection for the
slopes shall be installed as soon as
practicable and prior to calling for final
permit approval.
a. General Requirements. Cut slopes equal to or
greater than 5 feet in vertical height and fill
slopes equal to or greater than 3 feet in
vertical height shall be planted with grass or
ground cover to protect the slope from erosion
and instability. Other slopes as deemed
necessary by the Building Director shall also
be planted.
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 6
ORD. 893
Slopes exceeding 15 feet in vertical height
shall be planted with shrubs, spaced at not
more than 10 feet on center; or trees, spaced
not to exceed 20 feet on center: or a
combination of shrubs and trees at equivalent
spacings, in addition to the grass or ground
cover. The plants selected and planting
patterns may be varied upon the recommendation
of a landscape architect or a slope control
specialist with approval of the Building
Director. If a species other than those from
the recommended list of plants is selected, a
written statement shall be submitted by a
landscape architect or slope control specialist
certifying the plants suitable for erosion
control and slope stability. This statement
must accompany the grading plan at the time of
submittal.
b. Landscape and Irrigation Plan Requirements
1. Landscape Plan Requirements.
Landscape Plans shall be submitted for all
slopes required to be planted. The
landscape plan may be incorporated as part
of the grading plan unless, in the opinion
of the Building Director the plan becomes
too obscured to be effective. A landscape
plan shall include:
(a) A slope planting schedule that
provides common and scientific names
and specifications of all plants,
number and size of each tree and
scrub and the spacing of plants.
(b) The location of the planting.
(c) Details of the irrigation system.
Landscape plans involving more than
four structures shall be prepared and
signed by a landscape architect.
This plan shall include the details
necessary to complete the project
including scope of work, materials
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 7
ORD. 893
to be used (seed mixtures, plant
species listed by size quantity,
fertilizer used and rate of
application), construction methods,
maintenance and time table for
project completion.
2. Irrigation Plan Requirements.
Except where approved by the Building
Director slopes required to be planted
shall be provided with an approved system
of irrigation designed to cover all
portions of the slopes and shall be of
sufficient clarity to indicate the extent
of work proposed. Specifications for
devices, size and type of pipe, flow rates
and precipitation rates are to be shown
on the landscape plan. An approved
backflow prevention device shall be
installed in each irrigation system which
conforms to Chapter 10 of the Uniform
Plumbing Code. If the planting require-
ments specified in the subsection above
are waived by the Building Director, the
requirements specified in this subsection
may be waived.
c. Planting Method.
Planting shall commence as soon as slopes are
completed on any portion of the site and shall
provide for rapid short term coverage of the
slope as well as long term permanent coverage.
Minimum requirements shall include:
1. Planting Holes. Planting holes shall be
excavated twice as wide as the diameter
and 2 inches less than the depth of the
root ball of the plant. The planting
holes shall be backfilled with a mixture
of native soil, slowly decomposing organic
matter and an appropriate fertilizer.
2. Staking. Each tree shall be staked in
order to anchor the root system and to
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 8
ORD. 893
support the trunk in an upright position.
Stake material shall be of adequate
dimension and length to support the tree.
Ties used for typing the tree to the stake
shall have a broad surface to minimize
rubbing or girdling and have some
elasticity. In lieu of stakes a three
wire tie -down system may be used.
3. Ground Cover Spacing. Ground covers are
to be spaced in such a manner that 100%
coverage of the planted slope will be
achieved in as short a time as possible.
Spacing of ground cover shall not exceed
12 inches O.C. unless acceptable
supporting horticultural evidence
recommending greater spacing is furnished
to the Building Director.
d. Waiver of Planting Requirements.
Waiver of the Planting and irrigation
requirements may be approved by the Building
Director if found to be unreasonable or
unnecessary for one of the following reasons:
1. The erosion resistant character of
material composing the slopes make
planting unnecessary.
2. The unavailability of water making
irrigation either impossible or
impractical.
3. Slope heights are less than those
requiring planting by Section 3, paragraph
(H) 1.a.
e. Planting Maintenance. All vegetation planted
for erosion control shall be maintained in a
healthy, vigorous condition. Maintenance of
planted slopes shall include watering, weeding
and restoration of any plant material that may
die. Slopes that are affected by the future
installation of walls, fences, swimming pools
or any other building must be properly
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 9
6) Intersection of Menlo and Park - Menlo Avenue should be
realigned to join the tract entry. Menlo shall have
curb 64' apart within an 88' right-of-way.
7
Intersection of Yale and Park - Where right-of-way
permits, Yale Street shall be realigned to intersect
Park Avenue at a near perpendicular angle. Yale Street
shall have curbs 44apart.
8) All streets where construction is proposed shall be
reconstructed to City standards.
9) Signalize the intersection of Menlo and Park Avenue
with an 8 phase traffic signal.
10) Existing trees shall be preserved when possible.
5. Submit striping and signing plan in compliance with traffic
study.
6. StoLm drain improvements shall be coordinated with road
construction when possible. The developer shall secure
downstream easements when necessary to drain onto or across
private property. Drainage shall not adversely effect
downstream property. Drainage heading south shall be
directed into the Park Hill Retention Basin.
Drainage heading north shall be directed to existing master
plan drainage facilities in Meridian Street and Tract 21564.
If flows exceed the capacity of these facilities, further
master plan construction or on -site retention shall take
place.
Drainage to the west shall minimize impacts on the
intersection of Highway 79 and Menlo. Alternate routing for
storm flows should be explored.
Drainage southerly from the Buena Vista Retention Basin
should be analyzed for possible construction.
Portions of master plan lines A, B, C, D, & F may need to be
constructed as conditions of tracts within SP 1-89.
Developers should be aware that the costs to build required
facilities may exceed the normal drainage fees.
PARK HILL,
SP 1-89
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 13 '
7. Construct City street light system.
8. The development is within the service area of Lake Hemet
Water District for sewer and water. All units shall be
connected to sewer. Developer shall comply with Lake Hemet
Water District requirements for development of the sewer and
water systems to serve the project.
9. Eastern Municipal Water District shall provide a letter
indicating capacity exists to serve this project.
10. Provide combination bike path and sidewalk along perimeter
of the project.
FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS
1. Fire flows shall be a minimum of 1,000 GPM at 20 pounds per
square inch for a 2 hour period.
2. Join Community Facilities District #3 for adequate staffing
and equipping levels for this development.
3. Pay any fire mitigation fees in effect at the time
recordation of final maps.
4. Homes developed outside the 5 minute response time may be
required to have fire sprinklers. This shall be determined
at the time of tract map approval.
5. When individual subdivisions are approved, the Fire
Department may require some form of fire break or fuel
modification zone between developed areas and natural open
space.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
The proponent shall comply with the mitigation outlined in the
EIR and Supplemental' EIR. These include but are not limited to:
1. Pay fee for carpooling program in effect at time of final
maps.
2. Approval of geologic report by City geologist and compliance
with requirement of report.
PARK HILL,
SP 1-89
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 14
3. Construction of drainage and Flood Control Facilities as
required.
4. Pay local and regional roadway fees in effect at time of
final map.
5. Install traffic signal at Menlo and Park Avenues and make
street improvements as required by Public Works Department.
6. Join Community Facilities District No. 3 for public
services.
7. Mitigate school impacts by paying necessary fees required by
State Law, prior agreement, or policy of the City council.
8. Provide a minimum of 4.5 acres of active park and recreation
area.
9. Pay fee in effect at time of final map for construction of
public facilities.
PLANNING CONDITIONS
1. Fencing shall be in accordance with City regulations.
Fencing materials visible from the street shall be
decorative block, wrought iron, concrete, brick, or other
acceptable alternative.
2. Recreation facilities shall be fully landscaped and
constructed concurrently with the phase of development
benefiting from the improvements.
3. Open space shall be as set forth in the approved exhibits.
4. All existing and proposed utilities shall be undergrounded.
5. Pay all fees in accordance with City policies and
regulations.
6. A Comprehensive Development Plan shall be approved for all
portions of the Specific Plan within two years of the
effective date of this conceptual plan approval.
PARK HILL,
SP 1-89
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 15
7. Lot square footage calculations shall exclude slopes greater
than five feet in height, if said slope is steeper than (4)
four horizontal to (1) one vertical.
8. Applicant shall comply with City's adopted Hillside
regulations.
9. The number of dwelling units shall be reduced by 35 units to
523 units. These units shall be reduced from areas with
slopes greater than 25%.
10. The water tank shall be relocated to a site less visible
from the south. The tank shall be obscured with trees and
other landscaping. Consideration should be given to lower
elevations for the tank.
11. A minimum 20 ft. green belt shall surround the perimeter of
the project.
12. Construct a wrought iron or combination wrought iron/block
fence along the perimeter, located 20 ft. beyond property
line, at the rear of the green belt mentioned in Condition
No. 11.
PARK HILL,
SP 1-89
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 16
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: January 12, 1990
SUBJ: Change of Zone 17-89
Planned Unit Development 5-89
Enclosed is the Staff Report for Planned Unit Development 5-89, a
proposed development on the northwest corner of Palm Avenue and
Seventh Street. The Planning,Commission has recommended the
adoption of Ordinance 896, creating a Planned Unit Development
Overlay on the subject property pursuant to the approved
development plan.
Respectfully Submitted,
Brian McNabb
Director of Community Development
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: January 12, 1990
SUBJ: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
CHANGE OF ZONE 17-89,
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 5-89
APPLICANT: Palomar Savings and Loan
3146 Quiet Hills Dr.
Escondido, CA 92025
DESCRIPTION
A proposal to change the zone on 17.5 acres located on the
northwest corner of Palm Avenue and Seventh Street from R-1,
single family to R-2, Planned Unit Development
EXISTING ZONING Exhibit "A"
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN Exhibit "B"
EXISTING USES Exhibit "C"
CIRCULATION Exhibit "D"
FLOOD ZONE Exhibit "E"
SEISMIC Exhibit "F"
PROPOSED ZONING Exhibit "G"
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The zoning of this property was changed from R-3 to R-1 in 1988
at the request of the property owner. This requested PUD
designation is in accordance with the R-1 zone with a higher
density (6.4 units per acre) than a subdivision with minimum lot
size (3.2 - 4.2 units per acre).
The environmental issues that effect this property the most are
the "A" flood zone and a special studies seismic zone. These are
outlined in exhibits E and F. Development must mitigate these
impacts in accordance with State law and local regulation.
As a negative declaration was granted for the earlier zone
change, so a negative declaration should be granted in this case.
A more detailed environmental analysis will be provided related
specifically to Tract 24922, the proposed development for the
property.
DISCUSSION
A conceptual plan for this PUD was approved at the April 12, 1989
meeting of the Planning Commission. The applicant had submitted
this proposal in order to determine whether the City would
approve a 6,000 sq. ft. lot PUD or whether a 7,200 sq. ft. lot
traditional subdivision was in order. The basis for the request
for 6,000 sq. ft. subdivision were the 4,500 sq. ft. lots to the
south, the 6,000 sq. ft. lots to the north and northeast, and the
impacts created by the flood and seismic zones.
Staff has reviewed the proposed PUD against the appropriate City
regulations and found it to be in substantial conformance. An
undefined recreational area is required by the ordinance. The
proposed open space located on the north west corner of the
project consists of approximately .36 acres.
The developer is proposing a 1/2 court basketball court, a
trellis area with picnic tables, barbecues and a small open
recreation area. Staff believes this development is being
marketed toward families. The recreation amenities make a
homeowner's association necessary.
The streets are proposed as private. This helps increase the
density within the development. The streets and recreational
amenities make a homeowner's association necessary.
The average front yard setback is required to be a minimum 25
feet but not less than 15 feet for any building measured from the
curb line of private streets and from property line for dedicated
streets.
Staff reviewed the plans submitted and discovered the required
minimum 25' setback was not met. Per phone conversation, the
applicant proposed to change the plans to meet the required
average setback. A schedule of lot setbacks and a new site plan
will be submitted for review.
No side yards is required. However, adequate provisions are
required for light and air and free pedestrian movement.
A minimum 15 foot rear yard setback is required when the rear
yard abuts an adjacent private property within or exterior to the
development.
The PUD Ordinance requires the total ground coverage of the
entire development (not individual lot) not to exceed 60%.
A two car garage is required as prescribed in the City's Zoning
Ordinance 340, Article 15.
The ordinance requires one R.V. parking space per ten units.
Traditionally this has not been required if the Conditions
Covenants and Restrictions specifically ban their parking in the
development.
The ordinance also requires a two car garage as well as one guest
space unit.
RECOMMENDATION
Planning Commission recommends the adoption of Ordinance 896
approving the Change of Zone 17-89 from R-1, Single Family to R-
1, Planned Unit Development with the approved development plan
subject to Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval.
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
FINDINGS OF FACT CHANGE OF ZONE 17-89
1. Change of Zone 17-89 is located within a known flood zone.
2. Change of Zone 17-89 is located with a known special seismic
study zone.
3. Seventh Street and Palm Avenue are 88' secondary highways.
4. Utilities are readily available to the site with mainline
extensions and system improvements.
5. The subject property has a General Plan designation of low
density.
FINDINGS OF FACT PUD 5-89
1. The PUD Ordinance requires an area set aside for
recreational vehicle parking.
2. Portions PUD 5-89 is located with in a known flood zone.
3. Seventh Street and Palm Avenue are designated as a 88'
secondary highway.
4. Utilities are available to the site with main line
extensions.
5. The subject property has a General Plan designation of low
density residential.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PUD 5-89
1. The PUD Overlay District, and any Master Plan or other
materials approved as a part thereof, shall become null and
void if the physical development of the District is not
commenced within two (2) years from date of adoption of the
Resolution establishing the District.
2. Submit CC&R's to the City for approval.
3. Incorporate into the CC&R a statement prohibiting the
parking of recreational vehicles, boats, trailers, camper
shells, etc. within the development.
4. Front, side and rear yard set backs shall comply with the
City's PUD Ordinance.
5. Submit a percentage tabulation of the total building
coverage for the development.
530
R-1, Sinle Family
R2 091.052 ran 0/0.00T
7Rn O/0.031
R-3, Multi Family
9.6a er.. 9.67 te..
C
R-1 --
1.68 <c. •
EXHIBIT "A"
P.U.D. 5-89
EXISTING ZONING
POR FAR,
R-1, Single Family
1 7.
ant
M-1,Light Industrial/
41 .9.41.; a< 0/o-026
ve9
TRxO/0-008
es e0/1t
A, Agricultural
STREET
aG
�
�
.
,
°
�
�
� ||
�'
�
.
/�
Low Density Qesidential�,
107
High Density Residentia
91,",-*'.'
Low Density Residential
_
_
�
Light Industrial_~
I-\/
Community Commercial
EXHIBIT "B"
P.M. 5-89
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN
o=
53O
9
I Single Family (6,000 s.f.)
I
l
acant
RA O15-O5'
i
r R A 0/0-0OT
rr4c
Vacant -
I = 1
Home fors l
i r;,ubl ed'-'
Youths
EXHIBIT "C"
P.U.D. 5-89
EXISTING USES
POR FAR,.
Vacant
i54
r 1
a.4 uo-crs
,,AN 1/Jr
STREET
Tw AoJO-0O8
'rc Ses .a/Sr
00I
.Nrr
11
530
21
R t 69/-052
!10
9.6T+t.
R 4 0/0.0J/
9. 61 Jc•
-RA 010.007
-r
SEVENTH
0.7ftA
I
01 0
co'
4.14
POR FAR,.
TRt010-O08
dr
61 w1: O/0-626
11.01/1,
/.6S mac.' 1
®+1
8.+I ary
0
.0 IV1 ,
Secondary Roadway - STREET
I Ir
EXHIBIT "D"
P.U.D.5-89
CIRCULATION
EXHIBIT "A"
ORDINANCE 895
PARK HILL
DEVELOPMENT
ua uwu War Lore
PAnA00M so1$00
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: January 11, 1990
SUBJ: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND SUPPLEMENTAL EIR
FOR THE PARK HILL SPECIFIC PLAN AND SPECIFIC PLAN
1-89, THE PARK HILL SPECIFIC PLAN
APPLICANT: PARAGON HOMES
1448 15th Street, Ste. 100
Santa Monica, CA 90404
DESCRIPTION
Consideration of the Draft EIR and Supplemental EIR for the Park
Hill Specific Plan (SP 1-89) and a pre -annexation request to
amend the General Plan land use element and establish City zoning
within Annexation 60, and establish a 558 lot specific plan on
365+ acres on the westerly 3/4's of Park Hill.
ENVIRONMENTAL DISCUSSION
The County required EIR 225 to be prepared for processing
concurrently with specific plan 214 (Park Hill specific plan.)
This EIR is incorporated into the final specific plan document
which you received several months ago.
The Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution 88-519, approving
specific plan 214 which also enumerated the potentially
significant environmental impacts and specified the necessary
mitigation.
This project is now proposed for annexation to the City of San
Jacinto. Based on a review of California Environmental Quality
Act, (CEQA), Staff determined it was necessary to perform several
tasks. The City determined an EIR was necessary for this project
and sent out the appropriate notices to this effect.
Based on a review of the project, staff felt it was possible to
PARK HILL,
SP 1-89
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 1
review the County's EIR at a Public Hearing and confirm the
County's actions. However, because the City has different
policies and regulations and because the applicant has made minor
modifications to the plan, staff has required the preparation of
a supplemental EIR to address these differences.
As a part of this package we are attaching a copy of County
Resolution 88-519. This Resolution identified the following as
potentially significant impacts as a result of the development of
the Park Hill Specific Plan.
1. Regional growth and air quality
2. Seismic safety
3. Slopes and erosion
4. Flooding
5. Water quality
6. Wildlife/vegetation
7. Circulation
8. Water and sewer
9. Fire services
10. Schools
11. Parks and recreation
Due to the minor revisions proposed to the specific plan; the
effects of annexation on the EIR; policies and procedures
differing from the County; and, new agency input, staff
determines the following potentially significant impacts should
be supplemented.
1. Slopes and erosion
2. Air Quality
3. Circulation
4. Fire Services
5. Police Services
6. Schools
7. Parks and recreation
8. Solid waste
9. -Libraries andliealth services
Both the original impact and their supplements will be evaluated
in more detail. It is significant to note, the original specific
plan proposed 737 units. The County's approved EIR evaluated the
original number of units although the ultimate number of units
approved was reduced to 558. The supplemental comments only
address 558 units. The Planning Commission has further reduced
PARK HILL,
SP 1-89
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 2
this to 523 units.
REGIONAL GROWTH AND AIR QUALITY
EIR 225 stated the project will contribute approximately 1,350
residential 6% of the anticipated growth within regional
statistical area (RSA) 48. The project, by itself, will not
exceed growth forecasts, nor will it create significant impacts
on air quality in the local area.
Since the EIR was adopted, the Southern Coast Air Quality
Management District (AQMD) has adopted its new air quality
management plan. This plan calls for significant reductions in
pollutants across the basin.
The San Jacinto Valley is not currently impacted by the air
pollution problems plaguing areas further to the west and
northwest. This is largely based on the lack of traffic jams in
the valley. Because of standing vehicles on Riverside area
freeways, local air quality has deteriorated.
San Jacinto should do its part toward minimizing additional air
pollutants. The two most obvious methods are use of mass transit
and encouragement of ride sharing. Mass transit exists on a
limited basis in the San Jacinto Valley. Several fixed routes
exist running between the two cities. Ridership is small enough
to run mini -buses on these routes. A fixed route also runs
between the valley and Riverside.
Formal ride sharing programs do not exist in the Valley as this
time. However, the City has conditioned participation in
developing a ride sharing program on other developments and would
propose to do so with specific plan 1-89.
SEISMIC SAFETY
Anticipated ground shaking intensities could be high, with
landlide and flooding hazards as well as possible settlements.
These concerns are to;:be mitigated by construction in accordance
with the Uniform Building Code and the geologic report to be
approved by the County Geologist, when developed in the City.
PARK HILL,
SP 1-89
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 3
SLOPES AND EROSION
The existing landforms will be altered. Slope stability
constraints are expected. The revised plan anticipates 4,000,000
cubic yards of cut. Grading shall reflect original landforms
where possible. Eighty Five (85) acres or approximately 25% of
the site will be retained as open space. All grading related to
slopes must be evaluated and approved by the proper
professionals.
FLOODING
Development of Park Hill will alter existing drainage patterns
and increase runoff. The specific plan shall respond to the
flood control needs of the site as well as minimize impacts on
downstream properties. Erosion control methods will be
necessary.
WATER QUALITY
The specific plan will alter the composition of surface runoff
and will now contain minor amounts of urban type pollutants.
These will not significantly contribute to the degradation of
downstream water quality.
WILDLIFE/VEGETATION
Existing wildlife and vegetation will be lost except in natural
open space areas. Due to low diversity and abundance of wildlife
present, these losses are not considered significant. The open
space will provide habitat for vegetative and wildlife species
CIRCULATION
The Specific Plan will generate approximate 5610 vehicle trips
per day with approximately 570 of these occurring during evening
peak hours. All intersections in the area must operate at a
level of "C" or better during the evenings peak hour.
Construction of the proposed circulation system will provide
PARK HILL
SP 1-89
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 4
adequate service on -site. Intersections must be analyzed to
determine where additional signalization shall occur. All
streets bordering the project shall be developed to a minimum of
their ultimate half street widths.
WATER AND SEWER
Sewer plant capacity is adequate to serve this project. Water
supply is adequate provided a storage tank with booster pump is
constructed at a higher elevation.
FIRE SERVICES
The City of San Jacinto has a general policy of a maximum of a
five minute response time to development. The City currently has
one fire station located on Sixth and Pico. Response time from
this station is approximately five minutes to a majority of Park
Hill. When the main station is moved to Esplanade Avenue, the
entire hill will be within a five minute response time.
Additionally Station No. 2 is proposed for construction in the
latter part of 1990. This will provide back-up coverage within
approximately five minutes once the second phase of the San
Jacinto Valley Specific Plan is constructed.
Developer may be required to install residential fire sprinklers.
Otherwise will have to mitigate impacts on the Fire Department by
participating in the public safety Mello -Roos District.
SCHOOLS
The 558 dwelling units will produce about 140 students in Hemet
Unified School District, which is impacted. The developer will
be assessed the school mitigation fee based on State Law and
district policies unless other agreements exist between the two
parties.
PARKS AND RECREATION
The Specific Plan will create a need for additional park and
recreation facilities. The project provides 85 acres of open
space as well as two recreation areas. Their recreation areas
PARK HILL,
SP 1-89
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 5
will help minimize the impacts of the development but doesn't
release the project of its obligations to provide public park
space. The developer must address public park issues.
POLICE SERVICES
Increase in population will create additional demands on law
enforcement in the City. An anticipated increase of 2.5 sworn
personnel per 1000 people will be required. The City has created
Community Facilities District No. 3, the sole purpose of which is
to provide public safety staffing and equipment. The applicant
shall annex to this district.
SOLID WASTE
Development of the 558 units will generate an estimated 4.9 tons
of trash per day. The life of Lamb's Canyon Dump is shortening
but can apparently be expanded. Notwithstanding, recycling and
other methods must be explored to reduce solid waste impacts.
LIBRARIES, HEALTH SERVICES AND PUBLIC BUILDINGS
Growth will increase the needs for public facilities such as
libraries, youth centers, senior centers, etc. as well as
sometime public services like health services. The demands on
normal service, shall be met by increased tax payments. Demands
for other facilities such as youth and senior centers must be met
through fee payment.
ENVIRONMENTAL RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends at the close of the public hearing,
the City Council acknowledge review of County EIR 225
and the Supplemental Draft EIR adopting EIR 225 as the
base EIR for Specific Plan 1-89 and order a Final EIR
be prepared for the project based on these two
documents.
PARK HILL,
SP 1-89
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 6
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING DISCUSSION
In order to implement SP 1-89, as well as provide appropriate
designations within the remainder of Annexation 60, the Land Use
Element of the General Plan consideration of a General Plan
Amendment from Hillside Area to Low Density Residential has been
requested. The change to this density is proper to consider
given the types of development in the area, the availability of
urban services, and the proposed specific plan. However, the
General Plan calls for specific hillside regulations to be
implemented on Park Hill.
The zoning associated with the proposed specific plan and
surrounding properties should be R-1, single family, in order to
be consistent with existing and future land uses in the area.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the following:
1. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 90-
2 denying amendment of the Land Use Element of the
General Plan from Hillside residential to Low
Density Residential. Staff recommends the City
Council sustain the action.
2. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution 90-3
recommending the City Council adopt Ordinance No.
895 assigning pre -annexation zoning for Annexation
60 as R-1 (Single Family Residential) subject to
the Findings of Fact.
PARK HILL,
SP 1-89
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 7
FINDINGS OF FACT CHANGE OF ZONE 27-89
1. The Riverside County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution
88-519, approving Specific Plan 214.
2. The project is now proposed for annexation to the City of
San Jacinto. (Annexation 60)
3. The southwest area of the subject site is located within a
seismic special study zone.
4. Development of the subject site will alter existing drainage
patterns and increase runoff.
5. The subject project will generate approximate 5610 vehicle
trips per day.
6. The subject site is within the range of the Stephen's
Kangaroo Rat habitat.
7. Sewer plant capacity is adequate to serve this project.
8. Water supply is adequate provided a one million gallon
storage tank with booster pump is constructed at a higher
elevation.
9. The proposed development will generate an estimated 4.9 tons
of trash per day.
10. The development will create a need for additional park and
recreation facilities.
11. The subject development will create additional demands on
law enforcement in the City.
12. The subject development will increase the needs for public
-facilities such as libraries, youth centers, senior centers,
etc. as well aa=sometime public services like health
services.
13. A pre -annexation general plan amendment and change of zone
is required by prior to annexation.
PARK HILL,
SP 1-89
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 8
14. The State regulations require the zoning to conform to the
general plan.
15. The existing general plan designation and zoning is Hillside
Area and R-A, Rural -Agriculture.
16. The proposed general plan is for Low Density residential.
17. The proposed zoning is R-1, Single Family Residential.
18. The existing hillside policies of the General Plan require
any development to comply with adopted hillside regulations
different than Low Density Residential regulations.
SPECIFIC PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Commission recommended the City Council
conditionally approve Specific Plan 1-89 subject to the adoption
of the Final EIR by the Planning Commission and City Council,
including the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval.
Respectfully submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM: lr
FINDINGS OF FACT SPECIFIC PLAN 1-89
1. The Riverside County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution
88-519, approving Specific Plan 214.
2. -The project is now proposed for annexation to the City of
San Jacinto. (Annexation 60)
3. The southwest area of the subject site is located within a
seismic special study zone.
4. Development of the subject site will alter existing drainage
patterns and increase runoff.
PARK HILL,
SP 1-89
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 9
5. The subject project will generate approximate 5610 vehicle
trips per day.
6. The subject site is within the range of the Stephen's
Kangaroo Rat habitat.
7. Sewer plant capacity is adequate to serve this project.
8. Water supply is adequate provided a one million gallon
storage tank with booster pump is constructed at a higher
elevation.
9. The proposed development will generate an estimated 4.9 tons
of trash per day.
10. The development will create a need for additional park and
recreation facilities.
11. The subject development will create additional demands on
law enforcement in the City.
12. The subject development will increase the needs for public
facilities such as libraries, youth centers, senior centers,
etc. as well as sometime public services like health
services.
13. A pre -annexation general plan amendment and change of zone
is required by prior to annexation.
14. The State regulations require the zoning to conform to the
general plan
15. The existing general plan designation and zoning is Hillside
Area and R-A, Rural -Agriculture.
16. -The proposed general plan is for Low Density residential.
- .
17. The proposed zoning is R-1, Single Family Residential.
18. The existing hillside policies of the General Plan require
any development to comply with adopted hillside regulations
different than Low Density Residential regulations.
PARK HILL,
SP 1-89
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 10
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN 1-89
1. Specific Plan 1-89 shall consist of the following:
a. Exhibit A - Specific Plan Text
b. Exhibit B - Revisions to text and graphics
c. Exhibit C - Specific Plan Conditions of Approval
2. If any of the conditions of approval differ from the
specific plan text or exhibits, the conditions take
precedence.
3. The development of the property shall be in accordance with
state and local regulations and shall substantially conform
with the adopted specific plan, unless otherwise amended.
4. No portion of the specific plan which purports or proposes
to change, waive, or modify any ordinance or other legal
requirements for development shall be included as part of
the specific plan.
5. The conceptual development shall be valid for a 2 year
period only and may be extended for a third year. Prior to
expiration, a comprehensive development plan must be
submitted and approved in substantial conformance to the
approved conceptual plan. For the purpose of SP 1-89, the
approval date shall be considered the date of annexation.
6. Common areas identified on the specific plan shall be owned
and maintained by homeowners association or a public
organization. There shall be a permanent mechanism for
maintaining the common area.
7. Development applications must be in conformance with the
recommendations of Geologic Report No. 445. Specifically, a
slope stability report must be submitted to address
engineering, geologic, and soils engineering concerns for
each tract application. The report shall be reviewed and
approved by the'City's Geologist.
PUBLIC WORKS
1. All road improvements shall be constructed per City
standards, except roadway improvements within the County
shall be constructed to County standards.
PARK HILL,
SP 1-89
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 11
2. Pay fee to join the 1972 Lighting and Landscape Maintenance
District to maintain landscaping within public rights -of -
way.
3. Drainage shall be maintained between curbs for the 10-year
storm and within the right-of-way for the 100 year storm.
Velocities exceeding 8 CFS shall be given consideration of
underground storm drains.
4. Prior to the recordation of any tract within the boundaries
of SP 1-89, the project proponents shall make provisions for
the following street improvements:
1) Washington Avenue - install curb and gutter at 22' from
centerline on both sides between Hewitt Street and
Windham.
2
3
4
PARK HILL,
SP 1-89
Park Avenue (north side) - construct, curb, gutter and
sidewalk on the south side of the street between
Windham and the existing curb and gutter at the east
end of Park Hill. Curb to be located 22' from
centerline with transitions as necessary. Street
improvements in front of parcel N.A.P. shall also be
constructed.
Hewitt Street - Hewitt Street shall be relocated in
accordance with the Specific Plan. The 64' curb to
curb shall be located within an 88' right-of-way.
Curb, gutter, sidewalks shall be installed.
The connection between Cajon and Terrace shall be
constructed in a manner acceptable to the City and the
County Road Department. Driveway access shall be
maintained to all parcels.
Park Avenue (southside) - Improve north side of street
with curb, and gutter and sidewalks. Curb to be
located 32-4 -from centerline to the easterly Specific
Plan boundary including across properties under
separate ownership. The south side shall have curb and
gutter 32from centerline between Hewitt and Yale.
The south side of the street shall have two eastbound
lanes of travel between Yale and Cornell Streets.
JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE NO. 12
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO, INCLUDING
TAX STATEMENTS
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
P. 0. Box 488
San Jacinto, California 92383
AGE DA I/ -
—SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE -
ROAD DEED
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
PR EQUITIES, LTD., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
hereby GRANT(S) to the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATIQN, an
easement for public road and public utility purposes in the following described real
property in the City of San Jacinto, County•of Riverside, State of California:
SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION (EXHIBIT "A")
AND PLAT
Together with the right to enter upon and to pass and repass over and along said
easement and right of way and to deposit tools, implements, and other materials
thereon, by said City, its officers,• agents, and employees, and by any contractor,
his agents and employees, engaged by said City, whenever and wherever necessary for
the purposes above set forth.
It is understood that each undersigned grantor grants only that portion of the above
described land in which said grantor has an interest.
Dated:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF
, 19 SEE ATTACHED
On before
the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for
said State, personally appeared
SEE ATTACHED
personally known to me or proved to me on
the basis of satisfactory evidence to be
the person whose name subscribed
to the within instrument and acknowledged
SS.
me,
This is to certify that the interest
in real ptoperty,conveyed by the
Deed dated
from
to the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, A MUNI-
CIPAL CORPORATION and/or Govern-
mental Agency, is hereby accepted
by order of the City Council on
, and the
H 87-041.001
SCALE 1.1=2001
4d 3 36'
• PORTION LOT•2
. M 13
14' ADDITIONAL R.O.W.
4'
S.E. CORNER
LOT 2, BLK. 93
MB 1/14-15
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: January 12, 1990
SUBJ: Resolution 1862 and Annexation 68
Staff has been working with several property owners with property
between Washington Avenue and Park Avenue east of Hewitt regarding
annexation. These property owners have contacted most of the
residents in the area and have found them to be generally in favor.
Staff recommends the approval of Resolution 1862 initiating the
annexation of the subject property.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
RESOLUTION NO.:1862
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO INITIATE ON ITS OWN
MOTION PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX CERTAIN
INHABITED TERRITORY KNOWN AS
ANNEXATION NO. 68
WHEREAS, some property owners desire annexation to the
City of San Jacinto; and
WHEREAS, annexation to the City of San Jacinto will
contribute to the orderly growth of the City, provide proper
control of street layouts, sanitary sewer and water design
and to insure proper use of land in conformity with the
General Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council of the City of San Jacinto
proposes to initiate on its own motion proceedings to annex
to the City of San Jacinto all the territory hereinafter
described on Exhibit "A" as inhabited territory pursuant to
the provisions of the Municipal Organization Act.
2. That the territory which the Council proposes to
annex shall be identified as Annexation No. 68.
3. That the City Manager, or his designated
representative, is hereby authorized to file with the Local
Agency Formation Commission the appropriate application and
sign any and all documents therefore.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED on the 16th day of January,
1990.
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
Mayor
CERTIFICATE
The forgoing is certified to be a true copy of
Resolution No. 1862 duly adopted by the said City Council of
the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein.
Deputy City Clerk
8K
EXHIBIT "A"
ANNEXATION NO. 68
RESOLUTION NO. 1862
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: January 12, 1990
SUBJ: ORDINANCE NO. 894
GOVERNING HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
While processing the Park Hill Specific Plan, it became evident
the City needed specific development standards, for the hillside
rather than the policies contained in the General Plan.
We obtained copies of hillside regulations and policies from seven
jurisdictions and have written standards that we feel are
appropriate for San Jacinto.
Staff requests your positive consideration of these regulations.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
ORDINANCE NO. 894
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO GOVERNING
DEVELOPMENT IN HILLSIDE AREAS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Purpose
The purpose of this section is to encourage the orderly
development of hillside areas by relating the number
and distribution of dwelling units and other buildings
to the topography, so the terrain will suffer minimum
disfigurement by scarring from extensive cut and fill.
These regulations are also designed to minimize danger
to life and property due to the hazards of fire, flood
soil erosion, seepage, and destruction of natural
topography and plant material.
Section 2. Definitions
"Hillside" means areas which in general have a median
slope before grading of more than fifteen percent (15%)
or fifty (50 %) or more of the site or less step loads
which are strongly relates to areas of greater slope.
Section 3. Development Standards
Prior to any development on a hillside, a development
plan shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for
approval. The Planning Commission shall consider such
plan at a public hearing duly advertised by State Law.
The decision of the Planning Commission is final,
unless an appeal is made to the City Council within
fifteen (15) days of the action of the Planning
Commission.
The development shall substantially conform to the
following standards.
A. Lot Design - Minimum lot sizes shall be based on
the grade of slope prior to grading in the
following manner:
MINIMUM LOT SIZE
GRADE OF SLOPE
_7,200 sq. ft. net 0 - 15%
10,000 sq. ft. net 15 - 30%
20,000 sq. ft. gross 31 - 40%
40,000 sq. ft. gross Greater than 40%
1. In the 15 - 30% grade classification, 70% of the
lots shall have 10,000 sq. ft. with the overall
average of 10,000 sq. ft.
2. In the 30% - 40% grade classification, 70% of the
lots shall have a minimum of 20,000 sq. ft. with
the overall average of 20,000 sq. ft.
3. In the 40% grade classification - 70% of the lots
shall be one acre or more with the average of all
lots a minimum of one acre.
4. In all cases, where deviation from the minimum lot
size are permitted, no lot shall be less than
7,200 sq. ft.
Ordinance No. 894 Page No. 1
5. In consideration of a planned unit, specific
plans, or cluster type housing developments, the
Planning ComMission can provide for modification
from the preceding minimum lot sizes.
6. Grade of slope map - In order to determine the
areas to which the various grade of slope
classification, apply, the applicant shall submit
a grade of slope calculating the change in
elevation or natural grade per one hundred (100)
feet of horizontal distance. The contours of said
map shall be in five (5) feet increments.
For purposes of calculating median slope the
following formula shall be used:
Where:
S = 0.002296xIxL
S = average natural slope in percent
I = natural contour interval in feet
L = lenght of natural contours in feet
A = acres of property
0.002296 = constant which converts square feet into
acres and expresses slope in percent.
7. Minimum parcel dimensions - In order to comply
with the minimum lot area required by these
regulations, there are no absolute parcel widths
and depths. Buildable area is considered to be
contiguous area of the lot which is less than 30%
of slope.
8. Setbacks - Front, side, and rear set backs shall
be determined based on the precise development
plan and consideration of the constraints.
9. Building Height - Dwelling and other accessory
structures shall not exceed thirty five (35') feet
in overall height as measured from the median
grade across the buildable area.
10. Parking - parking shall be as noted in the zoning
ordinance.
11. Building Pads - the maximum building pad for each
parcel shall be as follows:
SLOPE
0-15 %
15-30 %
31-40 %
40% or greater
PAD STANDARDS
100% of lot may be graded pad
60% of lot may be graded
35% of lot may be graded
20% of lot may be graded
B. Soils, Grading, and Drainage
The general grading guidelines for a hillside
development is as follows:
Ordinance No. 894 Page No. 2
1. SLOPES
Cut and fill slopes shall generally not exceed 30' in
height, unless otherwise approved by Planning
Commission. The maximum cut or fill slope shall
generally be located on the down hill adjacent
property.
2. RETAINING WALLS
Retaining walls shall not exceed six feet (6') in
height except in front yards areas where they shall not
exceed thirty six,inches (36") in height. However,
retaining walls necessary for the construction of an
adjacent driveway may be constructed to a maximum of
six feet (6') in height any where on the property.
3. DRAINAGE AND EROSION
All graded areas shall be protected from wind and water
erosion through acceptable slope stabilization methods
such as planting, walls, or netting.
On site catch basins or siltation basins, as well as
energy absorbing devices may be required as a means to
prevent erosion as well as to provide for ground water
recharge.
Natural drainage courses should generally be protected
from grading activity.
Where brow ditches are required, naturalize with plant
material and native rock.
The outside corners or edges of all cut and fill
slopes, except at the top of slopes shall be required
to the rounded to eliminate sharp corners with a
minimum curvature radius of five feet (5').
"LANDFORMING" Shall be applied to all slopes adjacent
to public streets, gateways, and public view areas, as
well as all slopes greater than one hundred feet (100')
in length or ten feet (10') in vertical height.
Landforming shall be accomplished by the use of
variable slope ratios, undulating the tops and
toes, screening of terraces and down drains,
varying of surface features, and by landscaping.
Rear and side yard slopes between adjacent lots
within the same'project need not landformed unless
they are greater than one hundred feet (100') in
length or ten feet (10') in vertical height.
C. DRIVEWAYS AND STREETS
Driveways and streets should be designed in such a
way as to avoid excessive cut and fill slopes.
1. Gradient and Driveway Width Adjacent to Garage
Entrance
Driveways shall have a maximum gradient of 12%
along the center line of that portion of the
driveway located within twenty feet (20') of the
garage entry. The width of the driveway shall not
be less than the width of the garage opening(s)
within twenty feet (20') of the drywall entrance.
2. GRADIENT AND DRIVEWAY WIDTH OF REMAINDER OF
Ordinance No. 894 Page No. 3
DRIVEWAYS
The maximum gradient for driveways farther than
twenty feet (20') of the opening shall be 20%
along its centerline and shall not be less than
twelve feet (12') in width.
3. VERTICAL TRANSITION
Any vertical transitions shall be so designed and
constructed so that any portion of a vehicle with
a twelve feet (12') wheel base and five inches
(5") under vehicle clearance will not make contact
with the driveway surface.
4. STREET GRADES
Street grades shall not normally exceed fifteen
percent (15%) in grade.
5. STREET IMPROVEMENTS
All street improvements shall be to City Standards
except as allowed by these regulations.
a. Widths - In order to minimize grading, where
lot sizes average greater than 10,000 sq.
ft., street right of way may be reduced to
forty feet (40'), with thirty two feet (32')
of curb to curb width.
b. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk - Where hydrology
permits, curb in the hillside area may be of
the "roll curb" type. Sidewalk is not
required within the forty feet (40') right of
way area.
c. In the forty feet (40') right of way, parking
shall be permitted on one side only if
standard curb and gutter is constructed and
on both sides when "roll curb" is used.
D. INFRASTRUCTURE
All lots on the hillside shall be connected to a
public sewer system. All lots on a hillside shall
be serviced by underground utilities. Water mains
shall be of an.appropriate size to provide the
minimum fire protection required by the City.
E. LANDSCAPING
As a condition to the final approval of a hillside
development plan and prior to the recordation of
any map or issuance of a building permit,
whichever occurs first, landscaping plans,
including planting design and irrigation system,
all of which are prepared by a licensed landscape
architect, shall be submitted and approved by the
Planning Commission.
All cut, fill, and natural slopes, not
specifically designated as permanent open space
shall be planted with deep rooted plants or other
plants approved by the City, which are able to
acclimate to the environment.
The Planning Commission shall consider the
Ordinance No. 894 Page No. 4
following in reviewing, the landscape plans. The
planting of slopes for stabilization,. the fire
resistance ability, durability, size, and quality
of the plant Material, and planting design. Proof
of the ability of the soil to sustain the plant
material may also be required.
Slope planting and irrigation systems shall be
provided by the applicant on all slopes of three
(3) or more feet in vertical height. The subject
cut and fill slopes shall be adequately planted
with landscaping consisting of approximately one
third (1/3)shrubs and trees, and the remaining
two thirds .(2/3) grass or ground cover and/or
trees and shrubs.
F. IRRIGATION
All systems and planting shall be complete and
operative on an individual lot basis before final
approval of finished grade and before occupancy of
any buildings.
Maintenance of required landscaping is the
responsibility of the landowner(s). A landscape
maintenance bond for a minimum of one year's
duration from the date of acceptance of
landscaping shall be required to guarantee that
all plants shall be maintained and replaced as
necessary, until the property is permanently
occupied.
G. FIRE PROTECTION
1. In fire hazard areas, unobstructed fire protection
equipment access easements shall be required to
all parts of the development and to adjacent area,
which are potential fire hazards. The Fire Chief
shall recommend to the Planning Commission the
necessary locations of said easements.
Additionally, the Fire Department may require fuel
modification zones to minimize the fire threats to
private property.
2. Any construction within two hundred feet (200') of
a fire hazard area, including stairs, balconies,
porches, and open structure under buildings, which
are not of nonrcombustible materials shall be
protected by one hour construction.
All eaves shall be fully boxed in with exterior
stucco or its equivalent fire resistive
construction. Any required vents shall be covered
with one fourth inch (1/4") mesh or its
equivalent.
In lieu of the above, sprinkler systems approved
by the building official may be permitted.
Section 4. PUBLICATION
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper
of general circulation printed and published in the County
of Riverside, State of California.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the said City Council on
January 16, 1990.
Ordinance No. 894 Page No. 5
MEMO
TO: Chairman and Members of Industrial Development Authority
FROM: Ross S. Nammar, City Manager
SUBJ: TEFRA Public Hearing
DATE: 01-12-90
The Authority accepted an application from Edelbrock Foundry
Corporation for financing, pursuant to California Industrial
Financing Act. The proposed project will be financed to
purchase land and construct and equip the 75,000 square
foot facility to be utilized by the company that will
employ 100 employees for the manufacturing of high perfor-
mance automotive parts.
The project will be located at 1320 Buena Vista Street,
with the principal amount of financing not to exceed
$7,000,000. The Act requires a Public Hearing be held
by the Authority regarding the issuance of the bonds to
allow interested parties to seek information. The proceeds
of the bonds will be used to make a loan to Edelbrock.
Neither the full faith and credit, nor the taxing power
of the City or Authority or the State of California will
be pledged to the payments of the bond.
At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, no action will
be necessary other than reaffirming your action outlined
in Resolution IDA 89-2, adopted October 3, 1989.
Respectfully submitted,
ROSS S. NAMMAR
nr
AGE D
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: January 12, 1990
SUBJ: Draft EIR and Supplemental EIR
The Planning Commission, at its regular meeting of January 10, 1990
held public hearings on the Draft EIR and Supplemental EIR, the
Specific Plan, which also included the pre -zoning for Annexation
No. 60. The Planning Commission took the following action.
1. Recommended consideration of County EIR 225 as the Base EIR
for Specific Plan 1-89 with the direction a Supplemental EIR
must be prepared, and recommended approval of the Supplemental
EIR.
2. Denied the request to amend the Land Use Element of the
General Plan from Hillside to Low Density Residential.
3. Approved the pre -annexation zoning for Annexation No. 60 to
R-1 (Single Family Residential).
4. Recommended approval of Specific Plan 1-89 subject to
Conditions of Approval.
The EIR, Supplemental EIR, and modifications to the action were
sent -to the Council under separate cover. Attached is the Staff
Report on this subject. After testimony of the public, Staff
recommended the hearing be closed and the following action be
taken.
1. Accept County EIR 225 as the Base EIR for Specific Plan 1-
89, acknowledging review of its contents, and that of the
Supplemental EIR, and the order the preparation of a Final EIR
including the Final Supplemental EIR.
2. Deny the request to amend the General Plan from Hillside to
Low Density Residential.
3. Adopt Ordinance No. 895 assigning pre -zoning for Annexation
No. 60 as R-1 (Single Family Residential).
4. Conditionally approve Specific Plan 1-89 subject to the review
and approval by the Planning Commission and City Council of
the Final EIR.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:lr
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: January 11, 1990
SUBJ: Specific Plan 1-89 - Park Hill
Enclosed for your use and information are the following documents:
1. Approved Environmental Impact Report and Specific Plan from
Riverside County with insert of revisions proposed by the
applicant.
2. The Supplemental Environmental Impact Report dealing with
annexation to the City and project modifications.
3. A revised Specific Plan map with additional corrections to
the plan.
This item will be on your agenda January 16, 1990.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:lr
ORDINANCE NO. 895
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING
CHANGE OF ZONE 27-89 AMENDING ZONING MAP
OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby
amended by adding thereto Change of Zone 27-89 as herein set
forth.
Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the
City of San Jacinto shown on the attached map marked Exhibit "A"
made a part hereof, is hereby established as R-1 (Single Family
Residential).
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published
in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in
the County of Riverside, State of California.
Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council
on the 16th day of January 1990 by the following vote:
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
City Council on the day of 1990 by the
following vote.
17 AYES:
NOES:
18 ABSENT:
19
ATTEST:
20 Mayor
21
22 Deputy City Clerk
23 CERTIFICATE
24 STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
25 CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
26 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of
Ordinance No. 895 duly adopted by the City Council of the City
27 of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of
1990.
28
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San
29 Jacinto this day of 1990.
30
31 [ ( Deputy City Clerk
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: January 12, 1990
SUBJ: Acceptance of Public Improvements Tract 21564-7
Staff has inspected the public improvements for the public
improvements of phase seven of the Park Hill Collection and has
found them to be in substantial compliance with approved plans and
specifications.
Staff recommends the acceptance of the street into the City's
maintenance system
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN C ABB
Director of Community Development
AGENDA
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: January 12, 1990
SUBJ: Resolution 1861 and Annexation 67
Attached for your information is a copy of a letter from Premier
Homes, who desires to annex property they have purchased contiguous
to the city limits. As noted in the exhibit for the resolution,
the property is located immediately to the east of the Park Hill
Collection and south of the second phase of the San Jacinto Valley
Specific Plan.
Premier Homes has already contracted LAFCO indicating opposition
to any change in sphere of influence for this property.
Staff recommends the approval of Resolution 1861 initiating the
the annexation of the subject property.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
RESOLUTION NO. 1861
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO INITIATE ON ITS OWN
MOTION PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX CERTAIN
UNINHABITED TERRITORY KNOWN AS
ANNEXATION NO. 67
WHEREAS, some property owners desire annexation to the
City of San Jacinto; and
WHEREAS, annexation to the City of San Jacinto will
contribute to the orderly growth of the City, provide proper
control of street layouts, sanitary sewer and water design
and to insure proper use of land in conformity with the
General Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, BE RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council of the City of San Jacinto
proposes to initiate on its own motion proceedings to annex
to the City of San Jacinto all the territory hereinafter
described on Exhibit "A" as uninhabited territory pursuant to
the provisions of the Municipal Organization Act.
2. That the territory which the Council proposes to
annex shall be identified as Annexation No. 67.
3. That the City Manager, or his designated
representative, is hereby authorized to file with the Local
Agency Formation Commission the appropriate application and
sign any and all documents therefore.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED on the 16th day of January,
1990.
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
Mayor
CERTIFICATE
The forgoing is certified to be a true copy of
Resolution No. 1861 duly adopted by the said City Council of
the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein.
Deputy City Clerk
EXHIBIT ''A"
ANNEXATION NO. 67
RESOLUTION NO. 1861
January 1, 1990
Mr. Brian McNabb
Director of Community Development
City of San Jacinto
201 E. Main Street
San Jacinto, CA 92383
Dear Brian:
I am writing this letter to request that the City of San Jacinto
consider the property know as Tentative Tract #22900-3, located
south of Washington Avenue and west of North Meridian Street in
the County of Riverside, for annexation.
For your information, we have submitted the final map to the
County for processing. It would be our desire to complete
processing with the City should the annexation proceed in a
timely fashion.
It is my understanding that certain residents of the Park Hill
area are currently proposing that the Hemet Sphere of Influence
be extended to include our tract. Such a suggestion would be
counter to the wishes of Premier Homes. It is our feeling that
since the property to the west is in the City, it would be
logical to include our tract as well.
Brian, I would like to thank you for your continuing cooperation
with Premier Homes as it is our desire to establish an ongoing
presence in the City that will be of benefit to all concerned.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact
me personally!
cc: Curt Ensign
FW: ms
Sincerely yours,
amk 4444,“
Frank M. Webb
Forward Planner
PREMIER HOMES
1787 W. POMONA ROAD, SUITE J, K & L, Corona, CA 91720
(714) 272-8111 • FAX (714) 272-8110
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
SUBJ: ACCEPTANCE OF ROAD DEED FROM AGRI-EMPIRE CORPORATION
DATE: January 12, 1990
The Agri -Empire Corporation recently acquired some right of way
from Santa Fe - Southern Pacific contiguous to their property on
Main and Seventh Streets. This included property within Seventh
Street. As this is appropriately public street right of way,
Agri -Empire is proposing to deed portions of Seventh Street to
the City.
Staff recommends the acceptance of the road deed and its
recordation with the County Recorder's Office.
Respectfully submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM: ga
RECORDING REQUESTED BY
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO, INCLUDING
TAX STATEMENTS
'CITY OF SAN JACINTO
.P. 0. Box 488
San Jacinto, California 92383
A
—SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
ROAD DEED
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
AGRI-EMPIRE, a California Corporation,
hereby GRANT(S) to the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, an
easement for public road and public utility purposes in the following described real
property in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of California:
See Attached Exhibit
Together with the right to enter upon and to pass and repass over and along said
easement and right of way and to deposit tools, implements, and other materials
thereon, by said City, its officers, agents, and employees, and by any contractor,
his agents and employees, engaged by said City, whenever and wherever necessary for
the purposes above set forth.
It is understood that each undersigned grantor grants only that portion of the above
described land in which said grantor has an interest.
Dated:
March 24th,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY oF RIVERSIDE
, 1989
On March 24th, 1989 before
the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for
said State, personally appeared
WAYNE MINOR and LARRY MINOR
personally known to mc or proved to me on
the basis of satisfactory evidence to be
whose names aresubscribed
to the within instrument and acknowledged
that they executed the same.
the person s
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature C'qj
MARY K. COOPER
Name (Typed or Printed)
OFFWIALSFAL
MARY K. COOPER
NcIARN PUBLIC CALIF (AMA
PRINCIPAL 04 ICC iN
FIVLPSIDi COUNTY
My Cor,rns.on Expares Aug. 21. 1992
) SS.
R
DENT
This is t. certify that the interest
in real property.conveyed.by.the
Deed dated '
from AGRI-EMPIRE; a California
Corporation
to the CITY OF SAN JACINTO,.A MUNI-
CIPAL CORPORATION and/or Govern-
mental Agency, is hereby accepted
by order of the City.Council on
, and the
Grantee consents to the recordation
thereof by its duly authorized
officer.
Dated:
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
By
Mayor
DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX...NONE
(This arca for official notarial seal) City Clerk, City of San Jacinto
K. 20
2E:3
A
j\jLB
BLKJ
• • • z..."?
°E.? K. J
/ A/57/ se, 0 58 '30 "ki/ f /8498. 35 '
EK, .19
9 ./2-Jd
SD a CO
3- fa* - es, /1.1
1?4,40 L7E0/C,4770/V
od
AV"? -4 P'01?774N
5E1/ENT/I/ STREET
S4/1/ ,h4C/A/74 C4' .
AG
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
SUBJ: ACCEPTANCE OF ROAD DEED FOR RIGHT OF WAY ALONG MOUNTAIN
AVENUE
DATE: January 12, 1990
Peacock Radaker owns property on either side of the Meridian
Street Channel west of Mountain Avenue. The portion of the
property south of the channel is to be deeded to Eastern
Municipal Water District in trade for the park site. The northly
parcel will ultimately be granted to the City, while these
transactions are being finalized, the City has requested
dedication of Mountain Avenue to its ultimate right of way.
Staff recommends the City Council accept the road deed from
Peacock Radaker Equities and authorize its recordation with the
County Recorder's Office.
This motion should include acceptance from successors in interest
to Peacock Radaker Equities in case the Eastern Municipal Water
District escrow has closed.
Respectfully submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:ga