Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 9/16/2004AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 16, 2004, 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Invocation 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance 1.5 Special Presentations 1.5.1 Business Spotlight of the Month / Economic Development Specialist 1.5.2 Introduction of Fire Battalion Chief Robert (Bob) Michaels / Riverside County Fire Chief Greg Anthony 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Now is the time for the public to address the Council on any subject within the jurisdiction of the City Council not listed on the agenda. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the City Council. 3. PUBLIC HEARING 3.1 Tentative Tract 31544 Zone Change 7-03 and Variance 03-04 to facilitate a residential development of 134 single-family Tots located on the east side of the proposed SR 79 freeway and south of De Anza Drive / Community Development Director 1.) Mitigated Negative Declaration with De Minimus Finding / Approve 2.) Ordinance No. 04-19 / An Ordinance approving Change of Zone 7-03, re -zoning 41.71 acres from Low Density Residential (LDR) to R-1 Residential / Approve and adopt introduction of Ordinance 04-19 and by further motion read by title only: City Council Agenda September 16, 2004 Page 2 of 4 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California Approving Change of Zone 7-03, Re -Zoning 41.71 Gross Acres on the East Side of the Proposed SR-79 Freeway and South of De Anza Drive from Low Density Residential (LDR) to R-1 Residential (R-1) 3.) Tentative Tract 31544 / Approve based on Planning Commission's recommendation 3.2 Resolution No. / A Resolution confirming assessment and order Road, street, and highway maintenance for the Annexation of certain property into Assessment District (AD) No. 2003-1 — Annexation 3 / Approve Resolution No. _ declaring the results of the assessment ballot tabulation, ordering the maintenance work therein and confirming the diagram and assessment / Special Tax Consultant and City Attorney 4. CITY DEPARTMENTS 5. CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by City Council Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Mayor; state their name and address, and the consent calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. 5.1 Warrants at 09/16/04 / Approve / Finance Director 5.2 Treasurer's Report at July 31, 2004 / Approve / Finance Director 5.3 Regular Meeting Minutes September 2, 2004 / Approve / City Clerk 5.4 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Schedule of Events and Objectives and Policies for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 / Approve / Redevelopment Operations Manager 5.5 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) Grant spending plan Fiscal Year 2004 / Approve / Chief of Police 5.6 Proposed expenditure to establish a volunteer mounted posse unit for the San Jacinto Police Department / Approve appropriation of $3,055.44 to establish 20 member posse / Chief of Police City Council Agenda September 16, 2004 Page 3 of 4 5.7 Revised Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the San Jacinto Unified School District (SJUSD) and the San Jacinto Police Department / Approve / Chief of Police 5.8 Completion of installation of 230 street name signs / Approve and appropriate $26,400 from the General Fund Reserve authorizing hiring of two (2) full time temporary employees / Public Works Superintendent 5.9 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 8-04 / Ratify Planning Commission's approval of CUP 9-04 based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval for a wireless telecommunication facility located on the eastern end of Park Hill / Community Development Director 5.10 Resolution No. _ / A Resolution approving the Engineer's Report and setting the Public Hearing for the annexation of certain property into Assessment District (AD) 2003-1 — Annexation No. 4 / Approve and adopt / Special Tax Consultant and City Attorney 5.11 Ordinance No. 04-18 / An Ordinance amending Section 16.24.020 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code relating to the use of rural standards / Approve second reading and adopt / and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City of San Jacinto, California, amending Section 16.24.020 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code relating to Improvement Standards / Community Development Director & City Attorney 5.12 State of the City Event 2004 / Approve date, time, location — October 18, 2004, 7:00 a.m., Soboba Springs Royal Vista Country Club / Appropriate $2000 from General Fund Reserve to cover associated expenses / City Manager 6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS 6.1 Committee and / or Agency Agendas / Receive and File / City Clerk 6.2 Council Member Reports 7. CLOSED SESSION None City Council Agenda September 16, 2004 Page 4 of 4 8. ADJOURNMENT If you challenge any action of the City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone e/se raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council (c/o the City Clerk) at, or prior to, the public hearing. CHALLENGE TO LAND USE DECISIONS: Any person seeking to challenge a decision regarding land use made by the City Council as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and the discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the City Council, shall be required to commence that action 90 days following the date on which the decision of the City Council becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Please refer to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes final. It is the intention of the City of San Jacinto to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact City Hall at (909) 487-7330, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. 9. Dowr.4 Z. e4 , i&ea de eiteyo6Sao . dor eitat eagoa to de paed elte ivte9o4f9a9 r 10r/-d6SeAtemeez, 2004a4 Itf#6=ed4 . AGENDA ITEM 3. I September 16, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City ouncil FROM: Tim Hults, Community Development Director' itl SUBJECT: Tentative Tract 31544, Zone Change 7-03 and Variance 03-04 to facilitate a residential development of 134 single-family lots located on the east side of the proposed SR-79 Freeway and south of De Anza Drive. RECOMMENDATION: By motion the City Council should: Approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration with De Minimus Finding; Introduce Ordinance No. 04-Iq to amend the City's zoning map; and Approve Tentative Tract 31544, based upon the Planning Commission's recommendation. BACKGROUND: On August 12, 2004, the Planning Commission heard a proposal to change the zoning on 41.71 gross acres from Low Density Residential (LDR) to R-1 Residential to facilitate a tract map approval consisting of 134 single-family lots with minimum lot sizes of 7,200 square feet and an open space lot, on the east side of the proposed SR-79 Freeway alignment and south of De Anza Drive, as shown on Attachment "F". One of the lots will require a Variance for the lot sizes. A detailed discussion of the project is provided in the staff report prepared for the Planning Commission meeting (see Planning Commission staff report dated August 12, 2004 Attachment "C"). In hearing the project and reviewing the report the applicant was supportive of the Planning and Engineering Conditions of Approval, but requested the Planning Condition No. 34, requiring landscaping and irrigation on the freeway side of the tract to be deferred to the Engineering condition, not requiring these improvements on the freeway side, as it will be an isolated strip of landscaping not adjacent to a roadway, and when the freeway is built it will be damaged due to construction. Staff and the Planning Commission concur with the applicant's request to strike out a portion of the Planning Condition (Planning Condition Page 1 of 3 No. 34) referring to this area, and to defer to the Engineering Conditions of Approval regarding this area (Engineering Condition No. 26) Public testimony was requested, but no testimony against the project was provided. Staff informed the Planning Commission that RCTC (Regional County Transportation Commission) had reviewed the tract, and determined it to be consistent with their proposal for the freeway alignment in a letter dated July, 19, 2004, but also contemplated another design after the letter. The contemplated design will also be consistent with their proposal. In fact, the design would provide more land back to the tract for the applicant to create larger lots. The Planning Commission also had questions regarding "E" Street being a potential long street for vehicles to speed, and the maintenance of the Not -A -Part property at the southwest corner of "A" Street and "B" Street. Staff indicated these items would be addressed with standard policy requiring street calming measures for long streets (chokers, street hump, etc.) deemed appropriate by the City Engineer (Engineering Condition No. 32), and code compliance for property that are not properly maintained. Upon hearing all sides of the project, the Commission voted 4-0-1 (Absent Oliver) to adopt Resolutions No. 03-46 and 03-60 to recommend to the City Council approval of the Tentative Tract Map, Zone Change, and Variance. As shown on Attachment "B" the zoning designation is currently designated Low Density Residential (LDR). The Zone Change is a clean-up of an Overlay Specific Plan zone that has expired and is necessary to bring the site into conformance with the proposed single-family home development, which is consistent with the General Plan designation (see Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 12, 2004 for detailed discussion Attachment "C"). JUSTIFICATION: The proposed Zone Change to R-1 Residential is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. In addition, the surrounding General Plan designations are also Low Density Residential, except for the property to the west but this is separated by the proposed SR-79 Freeway. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated. In addition, the proposed density of development is less than that allowed by the proposed Zone Change, as the developer is proposing only 3.11 units per acre versus 5 permitted. The tract will also comply with all the requirements of the code in regards to lot sizes with the Zone Change. BUDGETARY IMPACT: None Page 2 of 3 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" — Attachment "B" — Attachment "C" Attachment "D" Attachment "E" — Attachment "F" — City Council Ordinance 04-XX (ZC) Current and Proposed Zoning Designation — August 12, 2004 Planning Commission Staff Report, Resolutions, Conditions of Approval, and Letters — CEQA document Vicinity Zoning Map Tentative Tract Map 31544 Page 3 of 3 Exhibit A STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) ORDINANCE NO: 04-19 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 7-03, RE -ZONING 41.71 GROSS ACRES ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED SR-79 FREEWAY AND SOUTH OF DE ANZA DRIVE FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) TO R-1 RESIDENTIAL (R-1). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. On August 12, 2004, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended approval of a proposal to Change the Zoning for the subject site, as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein, from LDR to R-1 Residential. Section 2. On September 16, 2004, the City Council conducted a public hearing and approved the Change of Zone of the subject site, as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein from LDR to R-1. Section 3. That the official Zoning Map of the City Council is hereby amended by adding thereto Change of Zone 7-03 as herein set forth. Section 4. That the official Zoning Ordinance 340, of the City Council is hereby amended by adding thereto Change of Zone 7-03 as set forth herein. Section 5. That the zoning of the property in the City of San Jacinto, as shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein, is hereby established as R-1 Residential. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 16th day of September, 2004. MOVED, PASSED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _ day of , 2004 by the following vote. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City of San Jacinto by Jim Ayres, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard City Clerk CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) I, Dorothy L. Chouinard, hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. duly adopted by the City Council of City of San Jacinto, California at a regular meeting thereof held the _ day of , 2004. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this _ day of , 2004. Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk [j background City LimitsCitylimits.shp Clines.shp Zoning A C-1 C-2 C-M City Well D-C D-R EMWD Fire Station M-1 M-I-P Open Space Park Park Hill -� R-1 R-1 15,000 R-1 20,000 R-1 PUD R-2 R-2 PUD R-3 R-P R-T RAAB n Rancho San Jacin S-D School SP 1-85 SP 1-91 W-2 Cove SP Trails SP L- SP1-91 MDR SP1-91 HDR SP1-91 CC SP1-91 LDR SP1-91 LDR Current Zoning - (SP1-91 LDR) Proposed Zoning R-1 Change of Zone 7-03 Ick Exhibit C STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Kenneth Phung, Contract Planner DATE: August 12, 2004 SUBJECT: Tentative Tract 31544, Variance 03-04 and Zone Change 7-03 Applicant: Joel Morse, T&B Planning Consultants 17542 E. 17th Street, Suite 100 Tustin, CA 92780 RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council: Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration with a De Minimus Finding; Adoption of Resolution No. 03-46 recommending approval of Zone Change 7- 03; Adoption of Resolution No. 03-60 approving Tentative Tract Map 31544 and Variance 03-04, subject to the Findings of Fact and the attached Conditions of Approval. PROPOSAL: Proposal to change the zoning on 41.71 gross acres from Low Density Residential (LDR) to R-1 Residential to facilitate a tract development consisting of 134 single-family Tots with minimum lot sizes of 7,200 square feet and a grass -lined channel, located on the east side of proposed SR-79 Freeway and south of De Anza Drive. One of the lots will require a Variance for the lot size being 7,088 sq. ft. versus 7,200 sq. ft. minimum. The tract is designed to align with the layout of the proposed SR-79 Freeway, and is in the Sunrise Ranch Neighborhood with a General Plan designation of LDR. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A: Resolution No. 03-60 (TTM 31544) Exhibit B: Legal Description of Subject Site Exhibit C: Conditions of Approval (Planning Department and City Engineer) Exhibit D: RCTC Letter dated July 19, 2004 and RTA Letter dated December 23, 2003 Exhibit E: Resolution No. 03-46 (Zone Change) Exhibit F: Zone Change Exhibit Exhibit G: Vicinity Zoning Map Exhibit H: Initial Study (Environmental Document) Exhibit I: Tentative Tract Map 31544 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: An environmental initial study has been conducted which has determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment with the incorporation of mitigation measures. Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, T&B Planning Consultants, is proposing to subdivide the 41.17 gross acres into 134 residential lots with minimum lot sizes of 7,200 square feet and a grass lined channel, on the east side of the proposed SR-79 Freeway and south of De Anza Drive. Lot 119 of the tract as stated earlier will require a Variance for the lot size as it is 7,088 square feet versus being 7,200 square feet minimum. The tract is laid out to have entrances on "A" Street and "B" Street. Street "A" runs north and south, with the south end terminating at Street "B", and the north end terminating at De Anza Drive. Street "B" runs west and east and connects to Sanderson Avenue to the west and De Anza Drive to the east, as with "A" Street because De Anza Drive runs diagonally in the City. The tract is designed to have the lots fronting the interior of the tract with the boundary of the tract being surrounded by decorative block walls to minimize noise from the boundary streets, and to create a community for the residents. Street "A" borders the project site to the east, with Street "B" bordering the site to the south. The north project boundary is a grass lined channel approximately 110-foot wide followed by De Anza Drive, which is currently a paper street. The proposed SR-79 Freeway borders the project site to the west. The tract has been designed to align with the Freeway design. A Zone Change from LDR (Low Density Residential) to R-1 Residential (One Family Residential) is also requested for the property to facilitate the development, which is consistent with the General Plan designation of LDR. The tract will comply with all the requirements of the code in regards to lot sizes with the Variance and Zone Change approval. PROJECT ANALYSIS: Protect Design: The project has access points off of "A" and "B" Streets to connect to the surrounding streets as stated earlier. The access points on "A" and "B" Streets are the main entries since they are on streets designated as major highways. A 14-foot wide stamp concrete crosswalk is conditioned to be installed at these entries (Condition No. 31); in addition, entry monumentation to include a stucco background with individual raised letters to identify the neighborhood will be provided at these intersections. In addition, all perimeter walls securing the site have been conditioned to be constructed of decorative block with a cap (Condition No. 28), and a minimum 3-foot landscape buffer between any wall and side walk to soften the wall and to discourage graffiti (Condition No. 35). The project boundary to the west as mentioned earlier is adjacent to the future SR-79 Freeway and will have a 32-foot wide landscape buffer to reduce the noise impact from the future Freeway. The design of the buffer has an 8-foot high earthen berm flattening out at top to allow a 6-foot high wall on the top to attain a total height of 12-foot. In addition, the footing of the wall is designed be deep and strong enough to increase the wall height to 20-feet to reduce any noise impact when the Freeway is built (Condition No. 29) per the Acoustical Study. RCTC has reviewed the buffer design and the layout of the boundary as it borders the freeway, and was satisfied with the design according to their letter dated July 19, 2004 (see Attached Letter: RCTC July, 19, 2004). The project boundary to the north as mentioned earlier is a grass -lined channel, which is approximately 110-foot wide. The channel is conditioned to have an irrigation system to support shrubbery and planting materials to the satisfaction of the City to beautify the project (Condition No. 34). In addition, the buffer will also serve to reduce noise from traffic on De Anza Drive when it's improved. Proposed SR-79 Freeway: As discussed earlier, the proposed SR-79 Freeway borders the project site to the west and is designed to accommodate the freeway layout. Per staffs last discussion with RCTC, the freeway will be an at grade design with crossings at "B" Street and De Anza Drive. Therefore, the project design is conditioned to satisfy the requirements of the City Engineer for the final pad elevations to provide privacy for the lots when the crossings are built (Condition No. 39). The final pad elevations are addressed with the Final Map, which is consistent for all map applications. The noise impact of the freeway is addressed by the 32-foot wide earthen berm buffer as discussed earlier. Variance: A Variance is proposed for Lot 119 as the lot size is 7,088 square feet versus being the minimum 7,200 square feet. The applicant is requesting this reduced lot size, as the west northerly portion of the site had to be trimmed to accommodate an off -ramp for the proposed SR-79 Freeway. The off -ramp created a less than optimal layout as originally envisioned by the applicant; therefore the applicant is making a Variance request. The Variance will be 112 square feet less than the minimum 7,200 square feet, but will meet all the requirements in regards to the lot dimensions for a corner lot (72 feet wide by 100-feet deep). The findings for the Variance are provided below: 1. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land involved and which are not applicable to other lands in the same district as the west northerly portion of the site had to be trimmed to accommodate an off -ramp for the proposed SR-79 Freeway. 2. That strict or literal interpretation of the provisions of this Zoning Ordinance for lot sizes would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship or would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Ordinance, because the proposed SR-79 Freeway created a less than optional layout as originally envisioned by the applicant for their property. 3. Special circumstances do not result from the Variance, because the proposed SR-79 Freeway created an unforeseen impact on the design of the tract; in addition the Variance will be only for 112 square feet less than the minimum 7,200 square feet lot sizes, but will meet all the requirements in regards to the lot dimensions for a corner lot (72-feet wide by 100-feet deep); and 4. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands in the same district. Not -A -Part (NAP) Property: There is a 2.21 gross acre remnant property at the southeastern end of the tract. The property has been set -aside as a NAP property as it is irregular shape and is difficult to develop, due to the fact that "B" Street separates it from the tract. The lot is also difficult to develop as "A" Street, which runs north and south terminates at "B" Street. Therefore, access is only available on "B" Street with the current layout. The design of this lot will likely require it to be developed in conjunction with other parcels as part of a tract development. However, to satisfy the City's immediate concern for the lot, staff is conditioning appropriate right-of-way dedication to be made, and that the sidewalk improvements be made for the frontage of the property, unless the City Engineer deems its appropriate to obtain fees equal to the cost of constructing the improvements (Condition No. 40). Zone Change As stated earlier the proposed Zone Change to R-1 Residential is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. In addition, the surrounding General Plan designations are also Low Density Residential, except for the property to the west but this is separated by the proposed SR-79 Freeway. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated. In addition, the proposed density of development is less than that allowed by the proposed Zone Change, as the developer is proposing only 3.11 units per acre versus 5 permitted. Development Requirements: The following development requirements have been identified to the applicant with the development of their project: Earthquake Faults — The site does not contain earthquake faults, but faults exist on adjacent parcels and are within the Casa Loma fault Special Study Zone Boundary. As with other projects with this situation, the project is conditioned to prepare a fault hazard study report, which shall be reviewed and approved by the County of Riverside. The recommendations of the Chief Engineering Geologist shall become conditions for the Tentative Tract Map. Street Maintenance — As development occurs, it naturally creates increased wear on city streets and roadways. To help finance the improvements and maintenance of city streets and roadways, local and regional transportation fees have been established and are collected prior to the issuance of a final certificate of occupancy. Currently the fee for regional transportation is $820 dollars per acre and for local transportation the fee is $500 dollars per acre. For this project, the total fees collected for this project is over $55,000 dollars. These two fees do not adequately cover the impacts this tract would have on surrounding streets and roadways. To mitigate the impacts of this subdivision the developer shall create or join a financial assessment district to provide for ongoing street and roadway maintenance and improvements. Signalization — This tentative tract will generate an increase in traffic on Sanderson Avenue. With all the developments proposed in the area, it is anticipated that signalization of Sanderson Avenue will be required in the near future. The approval of this Tentative Tract may cause cumulative impacts at this and other intersections in the area, which will force signalization sooner than planned. A payment of $150 per dwelling is currently the fee for signalization impacts. School Fees — An increase in the student population will result with this development. To mitigate this impact, the City will require this project to participate in a mitigation program as determined by the School District to finance future school construction. Police and Fire Protection — With the increase in general population there is a growing need to provide adequate Police and Fire protection. To meet this need, the city has established a number of Fire and Public Safety fees. These fees total approximately $633 dollars per dwelling unit, and are inadequate to provide the levels of service necessary for the anticipated population growth. A Community Facilities District (CFD) has been established to fund Fire and Police management services. The developer is conditioned to annex into this district. FINDINGS: Tentative Tract Map 31544 1. The proposed subdivision is designed, to the extent feasible, to provide for passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities because the lot size and the orientation does not preclude roof orientation for solar applications or passive applications such as eve design and landscaping used for shade. 2. The proposed subdivision and the provisions for its design and improvement are consistent with the General Plan for the City of San Jacinto because the land use designation is proposed to be Low Density Residential (LDR), which allows residential densities of up to five (5) units per acre. The proposed Tentative Tract is designed at a density of 3.11 dwellings per acre. Provisions for design and improvements promote the goals and objectives of the General Plan. 3. The Tentative Tract Map provides for land uses compatible with the surrounding area, as the surrounding properties to the north, south, and east are designated LDR in the General Plan for single family homes, and the provisions for design and improvements of the tract promote the goals and objectives of the General Plan as infrastructure facilities (water, sewer, street, flood control and solid waste) around the project site will be maintained and expanded to meet the future growth of the community. 4. The proposed project is consistent with City standards, ordinances, and policies in that the minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet is provided for all the lots except for 1, but will be consistent with the Variance approval for the lot; and the streets have been designed to be consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan. 5. The Subject Site is physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed in the Tentative Tract Map because the project is developed at a density below what is permitted by the proposed General Plan Amendment and is designed to comply with the lot dimension requirements of the zoning ordinance and the required right-of-way width for the streets. 6. The subdivision design and improvements proposed in the Tentative Tract Map are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because no development will occur in any significant habitat of a rare or endangered species of plant, animal, or insect, or any fragile or unique biotic community. 7. The subdivision design and type of improvements proposed in the Tentative Tract Map are not likely to cause serious public health problems because all development and public improvements will be performed per the requirements of all applicable standards and codes, including the zoning and building codes. 8. The subdivision design and type of improvements proposed in the Tentative Tract Map will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the Subject Site because such easements will given to the City. 9. The discharge of waste into an existing sewer system from development proposed in the Tentative Tract Map will not cause a violation of existing requirements prescribed by the local water quality control board because all dwellings will be required to obtain connection permits prior to occupancy. Zone Change 1. The proposed zoning designation of the subject site will make it consistent with the General Plan designation. 2. Uses of the Subject Site under the Zone Change help promote and achieve appropriate orientation and relationship between land uses within and adjacent to the Subject Site, and promotes orderly development beyond the Subject Site's boundaries because the proposed residential zone is consistent with the General Plan designation for properties to the north, south, and east. Although, the property to the west is designated Commercial, it is separated by the proposed SR-79 Freeway. Variance 1. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land involved and which are not applicable to other lands in the same district as the west northerly portion of the site had to be trimmed to accommodate an off -ramp for the proposed SR-79 Freeway. 2. That strict or literal interpretation of the provisions of this Zoning Ordinance for lot sizes would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship or would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Ordinance, because the proposed SR-79 Freeway created a less than optional layout as originally envisioned by the applicant for their property. RESOLUTION NO. 03-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) TO R-1 RESIDENTIAL (ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) FOR A 41.71 GROSS ACRE PROPERTY ON THE EAST SIDE OF PROPOSED SR-79 FREEWAY AND SOUTH OF DE ANZA DRIVE, MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS TTM 31544: FILE NO. ZC 7-03. WHEREAS, T&B Planning Consultants filed an application on August 8, 2003; File No. ZC 7-03, for a change of zone from Low Density Residential (LDR) to R-1 Residential (One Family Residential) for a 41.71 gross acre property on the east side of proposed SR-79 Freeway and south of De Anza Drive in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, more commonly known as TTM 31544 or Assessor's Parcel Numbers 431-020-008 ("Subject Site"); WHEREAS, the Application was reviewed, studied, and found to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") as more fully described below; WHEREAS, on August 12, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of San Jacinto ("Commission") conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application at which time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the Application were heard and the Application was comprehensively reviewed; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Based on the entire record before the Commission, all written and oral evidence presented to the Commission, and the findings set forth in this Resolution, the Commission recommends the City Council of the City of San Jacinto approve the aforementioned zone change as described in the attached Exhibit "F", designating the Subject Site as being within the R-1 Residential zoning district ("Zone Change"). SECTION 2. Based on the entire record before the Commission and all written and oral evidence presented to the Commission, the Commission finds the Zone Change is consistent with the General Plan of the City of San Jacinto because: A. The proposed zoning designation of the subject site will make it consistent with the General Plan designation. B. Uses of the Subject Site under the Zone Change help promote and achieve appropriate orientation and relationship between land uses within and adjacent to the Subject Site, and promotes orderly development beyond the Subject Site's boundaries because the proposed residential zone is consistent with the General Plan designation for properties to the north, south, and east. Although, the property to the west is designated Commercial, it is separated by the proposed SR-79 Freeway. SECTION 3. Based on the entire record before the Commission and all written and oral evidence presented to the Commission, the Commission finds the Zone Change is reasonably related to the public welfare of the citizens of the City of San Jacinto and the surrounding region because: the Subject Site will provide low density housing opportunities in this area of the city where housing of this type has not been previously available. SECTION 4. Based on the entire record before the Commission and all written and oral evidence presented to the Commission, the Commission finds the Zone Change complies with CEQA for the following reasons: Although the proposed project could have had a significant effect on the environment, there will not be significant effect in this case because revisions in the project or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur; therefore A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION has been prepared. City Staff is directed to file a Notice of Determination within 5 days of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 12th day of August 2004. Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Commission Secretary RESOLUTION NO. 03-60 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 31544, A 134 SINGLE FAMILY LOT SUBDIVISION ON 41.71 GROSS ACRES AND, VARIANCE NO. 3-04 TO ALLOW A REDUCED LOT SIZES FOR 1 LOT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF PROPOSED SR-79 FREEWAY AND SOUTH OF DE ANZA DRIVE: FILE NO. VTTM 31544 AND VARIANCE NO. 3-04. WHEREAS, T&B Planning Consultants filed an application on August 8, 2003, for Tentative Tract Map No. 31544 to subdivide 41.71 gross acres into 134 single-family lots and a Variance for a lot size being 7,088 square feet versus being 7,200 square feet minimum located on the east side of proposed SR-79 Freeway and south of De Anza Drive, and more particularly described in Exhibit "B" ("Legal Description"); WHEREAS, the property affected by this Application will be located within the Rl (Single Family) zoning district with the approval of the Zone Change currently being processed with this application (ZC 7-03); WHEREAS, the Application was reviewed, studied, and found to comply with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") as more fully described below; WHEREAS, on August 12, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of San Jacinto ("Planning Commission") conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Applications, at which time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the Applications were heard and the Applications were comprehensively reviewed; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Based on the entire record before the Planning Commission, all written and oral evidence presented to the Planning Commission, and the findings set forth in this Resolution, the Planning Commission approves Tentative Tract Map No. 31544 and Variance 7-03, subject to the conditions of approval in Exhibit "C". SECTION 2. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66410 et seq., based on the entire record before the Planning Commission and all written and oral evidence presented to the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission finds as follows: Tentative Tract Map: A. The proposed subdivision is designed, to the extent feasible, to provide for passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities because the lot size and the orientation does not preclude roof orientation for solar applications or passive applications such as eve design and landscaping used for shade. B. The proposed subdivision is designed, to the extent feasible, to provide for passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities because the lot size and the orientation does not preclude roof orientation for solar applications or passive applications such as eve design and landscaping used for shade. C. The proposed subdivision and the provisions for its design and improvement are consistent with the General Plan for the City of San Jacinto because the land use designation is proposed to be Low Density Residential (LDR), which allows residential densities of up to five (5) units per acre. The proposed Tentative Tract is designed at a density of 3.11 dwellings per acre. Provisions for design and improvements promote the goals and objectives of the General Plan. D. The Tentative Tract Map provides for land uses compatible with the surrounding area, as the surrounding properties to the north, south, and east are designated LDR in the General Plan for single family homes, and the provisions for design and improvements of the tract promote the goals and objectives of the General Plan as infrastructure facilities (water, sewer, street, flood control and solid waste) around the project site will be maintained and expanded to meet the future growth of the community. E. The proposed project is consistent with City standards, ordinances, and policies in that the minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet is provided for all the lots except for 1, but will be consistent with the Variance approval for the lot; and the streets have been designed to be consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan. F. The Subject Site is physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed in the Tentative Tract Map because the project is developed at a density below what is permitted by the proposed General Plan Amendment and is designed to comply with the lot dimension requirements of the zoning ordinance and the required right-of-way width for the streets. G. The subdivision design and improvements proposed in the Tentative Tract Map are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because no development will occur in any significant habitat of a rare or endangered species of plant, animal, or insect, or any fragile or unique biotic community. H. The subdivision design and type of improvements proposed in the Tentative Tract Map are not likely to cause serious public health problems because all development and public improvements will be performed per the requirements of all applicable standards and codes, including the zoning and building codes. I. The subdivision design and type of improvements proposed in the Tentative Tract Map will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of the Subject Site because such easements will given to the City. J. The discharge of waste into an existing sewer system from development proposed in the Tentative Tract Map will not cause a violation of existing requirements prescribed by the local water quality control board because all dwellings will be required to obtain connection permits prior to occupancy. Variance: A. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land involved and which are not applicable to other lands in the same district as the west northerly portion of the site had to be trimmed to accommodate an off -ramp for the proposed SR- 79 Freeway. B. That strict or literal interpretation of the provisions of this Zoning Ordinance for lot sizes would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship or would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Ordinance, because the proposed SR-79 Freeway created a less than optional layout as originally envisioned by the applicant for their property. C. Special circumstances do not result from the Variance, because the proposed SR-79 Freeway created an unforeseen impact on the design of the tract; in addition the Variance will be only for 112 square feet less than the minimum 7,200 square feet lot sizes, but will meet all the requirements in regards to the lot dimensions for a corner lot (72-feet wide by 100-feet deep); and D. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands in the same district. SECTION 3. Pursuant to section 66412.3 of the Government Code, based on the entire record before the Planning Commission and all written and oral evidence presented to the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission finds the subdivision and improvements proposed in the Tentative Tract Map help the City of San Jacinto meet its regional housing needs because the development will provide for a balance residential environment with access to employment opportunities, community facilities, and adequate services. SECTION 4. Based on the entire record before the Planning Commission and all written and oral evidence presented to the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission finds the nature and extent of the dedications, reservations, impact fees, and other exactions are reasonably related to public needs and roughly proportional to the impacts created by the subdivision and improvements proposed based on studies conducted prior to adopting the development fees. SECTION 5. Based on the entire record before the Planning Commission and all written and oral evidence presented, the Planning Commission finds the proposed Tentative Tract Map and Variance complies with CEQA for the following reasons: The proposed project will not result in significant adverse environmental effects, as a Mitigated Declaration has been prepared. Potential environmental impacts will not be significant because revisions to the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. SECTION 6. The location and custodian of the documents and any other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission based its decision is as follows: Community Development Director, City of San Jacinto Planning Department, 248 E. Main Street, San Jacinto, CA 92683, 909-487-7330. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12`h day of August 2004. Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Commission Secretary DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — TENTATIVE TRACT 31544 PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements: 1. The proposal to subdivide 41.17-acres into 134 residential Tots shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance. 2. Tentative Tract 31544 shall comply with the development standards of the R-1 zoning district. 3. This conditionally approved vesting tentative map will expire 2 years after the Planning Commission's approval, unless an extension is requested and approved per Section 16.12.150 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code. 4. This project shall conform to either the park dedication or in -lieu fee measures of the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 5. The applicant shall agree to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City, its officers, agents and employees, from any and all liability or claims that may be brought against the City arising out of this vesting tentative map approval, save and except that caused by City's active negligence. 6. The developer or the developer's successor -in -interest shall be responsible for maintaining the undeveloped portion of the site, including weed abatement. 7. During construction and grading, the site shall be watered to control dust. Additionally, regularly sweeping and cleanup of adjacent streets shall be undertaken. All mud and dirt shall be removed from construction equipment and vehicles prior to leaving the site. 8. Construction and grading activities shall be limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, except on legal holidays when construction and grading shall also be prohibited. All construction equipment shall be properly muffled, and/or surrounded by noise attenuating barriers. 9. The developer/owner of the tract shall name the City as the owner and maintenance operator of the sewer collection system within the subdivision. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map: 10. Tentative Tract 31544 shall establish or be incorporated into a Landscape, Lighting and Park District. 11. The developer/applicant shall prepare CC&R's for City review and approval. The CC&R's shall include a provision allowing the increase of fees to ensure continued maintenance of all common and public areas in the event any assessment district is reduced or eliminated, and the City shall be a party to the CC&R's. 12. A development plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Commission. Those conditions not implemented at the recordation of the final map shall become conditions of approval of the development plan. The development plan shall consist of: a.) Precise grading plan b.) Floor plans c.) Elevations d.) Typical front yard landscaping e.) Entry monumentation and parkway landscape treatments Grading: 13. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 14. Prior to issuance of a building permit the developer shall submit three (3) copies of a comprehensive grading plan. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70. The plan shall be drawn on 24" X 36" Mylar by a registered civil engineer. 15. A grading permit shall be obtained from the City of San Jacinto prior to the commencement of any grading outside of the City -maintained road right-of-way. 16. Grading and public improvements shall be installed in accordance with city standards and specifications. The tops of all graded slopes shall be at the property line. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits: 17. The developer shall pay school fees as required by State law to help mitigate the effects of this subdivision on the San Jacinto Unified School District. 18. The developer shall receive written clearance from the San Jacinto Unified School District. 19. The developer shall pay for the appropriate Flood Control Improvements. 20. The developer shall pay fees to provide for adequate Police and Fire protection. The developer shall annex into the financial assessment district formed to fund Fire and Police management services. 21. The tract is required to pay the Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fee and the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). These fees are collected at the time of building permit issuance. 22. A special fault hazard study report shall be prepared for the project site, and reviewed and approved by the County of Riverside. The project shall be subject to any recommendations contained in that report by reference. Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits: 23. All existing and new utilities adjacent to and on site shall be located underground as per Ordinance 820 24. The applicant shall contact the San Jacinto Post Office to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. 25. The applicant shall install slate, concrete, tile, clay tile or equal roofing material on all units within the subject property. 26. Black address numbers on white fluorescent background shall be painted on the curb (numbers shall be a minimum 4 inches in height). Landscaping, Fencing and Entry Monumentation: 27. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit landscape and irrigation plans for each production unit. All front yards shall be fully landscaped with not Tess than two 15-gallon trees, shrubs and turf. Landscaping and automatic irrigation improvements shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 28. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy the developer shall construct a six (6) foot high decorative block wall with pilaster columns spaced between every two lots (or no less than 150-feet) around the perimeter of the property that is visible from a public street, along the grass lined channel, and at the return wall for corner lots. A six (6) foot decorative vinyl fence shall be constructed along all interior side yard property lines. Lots that are bounded by the grass lined channel can have optional view type fencing. Said fence and wall plans shall comply with the City's Fence Guidelines and be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Department. 29. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy for the Lots adjacent to the proposed SR-79 Freeway, an 8-foot decorative high decorative block wall shall be constructed adjacent to the Freeway with footing deep and strong enough to increase the height of the wall to 20-feet to mitigate the noise impact from the Freeway when it's built. 30. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy all utility substructures shall be located and/or screened with landscaping materials so as to minimize visibility from the public right-of-way. 31. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy minimum 14-foot wide stamp concrete walkways shall be installed at the project entrance on "C" Street and "I" Street. 32. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy entry monumentation signs shall be installed in the form of a stucco plaque with raised individual letters at the project entrance on lots 1, 17, 41 and 111. 33. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy parkway landscape treatments shall be installed and approved by the Planning Department. 34. The landscaping for the grass lined channel, shall be submitted for the City's review and approval. The landscaping within this area these -areas shall include an irrigation system to support shrubbery and planting materials to the satisfaction of the City, and the landscaping shall be installed prior to the issuance of the 67th occupancy permit. 35. A minimum 3-foot wide landscape buffer shall be provided between any walkway and perimeter wall. In addition, a minimum of two trees shall be installed along street side yard. However, in no case shall trees in the street side yard be spaced less than 30-feet on -center. Special Conditions: 36. The developer shall disclose to all future property owners of the tract, indicating the proximity of agricultural uses and associated noise, dust, odors and the use of agricultural chemicals. 37. The developer shall disclose to all future property owners of the tract, indicating the proximity of large animals and the related insects, noise, dust, odors and the possible use of agricultural chemicals in farmland throughout the City. 38. Only gas burning fireplaces are permitted. A disclosure shall be indicated on the title of the property, stating that wood burning fire places are prohibited. In addition, the realtor for project shall state to the future home buyer that wood burning fire places are prohibited. 39. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map the final pad elevations shall be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer to address privacy concerns for lots at the Freeway crossings. 40. Appropriate right-of-way shall be dedicated for the NAP property and be improved with appropriate sidewalk improvements along the street frontage, unless the City Engineer deems it appropriate to obtain fees equal to the cost of constructing the improvements. FINAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — TENTATIVE TRACT 31544 BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Requirements: 1. All required Fire Department vehicle access roads shall be maintained in a passable condition at all times for emergency Fire Department use. Gates or other obstructions shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to construction. 2. If construction is phased, each phase shall be provided with approved access roads (curb, gutter and all-weather surface) and fire protection prior to building construction. 3. All developments shall have two points of access, via access roads (curb, gutter and all-weather surface). 4. All lumber scraps, combustible materials and other debris shall be picked up daily, or more often as required by the Building and Safety Department. 5. If water supply for fire hydrants is lost or if pressure is dramatically reduced, the applicant/owner should contact the City of San Jacinto, Building and Safety Department Prior to Issuance of Building Permits: 6. Fire hydrants shall be tested, accepted and placed in service prior to any combustible material's being placed on the site. Hydrants shall be placed on all streets in and around all projects. 7. All locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department access roads (curb, gutter and all-weather surface), for 60,000 Ibs GVW/traffic index of AC thickness of .25, provided prior to construction. Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits: 8. Specific address for each home shall be provided, shall be contrasting color and background, and shall be 4" in height. All house address shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. TO: MEMORANDUM August 3, 2004 Tim Hults, Comity Development Director FROM: Habib Motlagh,'City Engineer SUBJECT: Tentative Tract No. 31544 — Engineering Conditions of Approval With respect to the Conditions of Approval for the above referenced project, the City of San Jacinto requires that the land divider provide the following street improvements and/or road dedications in accordance with City of San Jacinto Ordinances. It is understood that the tract map correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways and drainage courses. These ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts of requirements, occurring in ONE are as binding as though occurring in all. They are intended to be complimentary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvements. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the City Engineer's office. 1. Drainage and flood control facilities and improvements shall be provided in accordance with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, and the City of San Jacinto requirement, and the following: a. This project is located within the limits of the San Jacinto Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted by the City. The developer and residents of this subdivision shall support the continuous maintenance of the basin, drainage facilities, open space, landscaping, street lighting, and street maintenance by annexing to the Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 (LLPD # 2) prior to recordation of any final map or issuance of any permit. 2. The developer shall provide water and sewer services to each lot in accordance with the requirements of the appropriate utility purveyor. This project is within the City of San Jacinto sewer and EMWD's water service area. Water and sewer improvements shall be installed per EMWD Standards. 3. On and off -site fire hydrants shall be installed as determined by the Fire Department. 4. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, the developer shall comply with NPDES and S.W.P.P.P. requirements, and NOI must be submitted to Water Quality Board for review and approval. Additionally, grading, street, water, sewer, hydrology, drainage improvement plans, and final map shall be submitted as a package and reviewed concurrently. No grading permit shall be issued until City Engineer finds the plans in compliance with Conditions of Approval and City Ordinances. 5. 6' wide concrete sidewalk and handicap ramps shall be constructed throughout the project (on and off -site). Construction of sidewalk adjacent to driveways shall be in a manner to accommodate ADA Standards. 6. The street, grading, striping, water, sewer, and drainage improvement plans in addition to hydrological calculations and other supporting documents shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The improvement shall be installed pursuant to Riverside County Transportation, Riverside County Flood Control, and Eastern Municipal Water District Standards. 7. Marbelite street lights as determined by the City Engineer shall be installed along all streets per SCE and Riverside County Standards. 8. Existing power poles adjacent to this development shall be underground or relocated as appropriate per City and SCE regulations and requirements. 9. The grading and construction of this project shall be done in a manner to perpetuate existing drainage patterns. Any deviation, increased or concentration of runoff requires drainage easements from effected property owners. 10. The proposed open channel located at the northerly tract boundary shall be landscaped and fenced as approved by Planning Commission. Appropriate access shall be provided for proper maintenance of these facilities. Open channel shall accept the offsite runoff and convey the 100- year on and offsite flow to an acceptable outlet. 11. The proposed offsite basin shall be designed and constructed in a manner to provide the following: A. The basin shall be designed to assume full retention (100-year storm) with appropriate free board, pursuant to Riverside County Flood Control Standards. B. The basin shall have no more than 2.5' of water in 100-year event. Fencing, landscaping, and gate(s) shall be provided as determined by Planning Department. C. Emergency overflow, pumps, and stand by generator shall be installed to discharge the 100-year storm event to an acceptable outlet within 72-hours. D. The basin shall be designed in a manner to percolate within 72- hours during any 100-year flood events, with side slopes of 5:1, and a maximum depth of 3.5' below future streets. E. No park credit for the future construction and improvements of basin shall be provided, except for equipment, such as tot lot as determined by Planning Department and Commission. F. The retention basin is located within the boundaries of adjacent project. The basins shall be expanded to also be utilized for park purpose at the time of development of adjacent project. 12. Construction of nuisance drainage pipe (minimum of 18") and catch basins and connection to the proposed open channel shall be required, as shown on tentative map and at the following locations: A. Intersection of Street "A" with "I" Street B. Intersection of "E" with "I" and "F" C. Intersection of "J" with "L" and street adjacent to Lots 105 and 129 13. 10-year and 100-year storm events shall be retained within street improvements and proposed right-of-way lines. 14. Street "B" from easterly tract boundary to westerly boundary shall be improved with new asphalt paving and concrete curb, gutter, located 32' northerly of centerline within 44' half -width dedicated right-of-way. Street "B" on the south side within the same limits shall be improved with new asphalt paving (15' wide). Additional landscape and slope set back shall be provided along frontage of this Tract to accommodate future Hwy 79 improvements. "B" Street from westerly tract boundary to Sanderson Avenue shall be improved with minimum of 30' of pavement including street lights as approved by City Engineer. "B" Street from easterly tract boundary to Lyon Avenue or to an existing paved road, as approved by City shall be improved with minimum of 30' new pavement with AC berm, including street lights. 15. Additional improvement at all exterior intersections, including Sanderson Avenue shall be required as determined by City. The improvements at a minimum shall include transition, left and right turn lanes (all directions). 16. Prior to recordation of final map, the applicant shall participate with area benefit assessment for construction of realigned Lyon Avenue proposed by City. In the event this assessment is not approved by City Council, this project shall be required to install a minimum of 30' new paving along proposed alignment of Lyon Avenue, from project northerly boundary to Ramona Boulevard within dedicated right-of-way. 17. All interior streets shall be improved with concrete curb, gutter, located 20' on either side of centerline within 56' dedicated right-of-way, and 2' Public Utility Easement on either side of the right-of-way. 18. Minimum centerline gradient shall be 0.4%. 19. The following shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of any permit or recordation of the final map: • Street Improvement Plans • Striping Plans • Water and Sewer Plan • Drainage Plans • Hydrology and hydraulic report • Landscaping plans for channel, streets, open space, basin, etc. • SWPPP (for reference only) 20. Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall secure City and appropriate agency's approval of the improvement plans. 21. Prior to final map recordation, developer shall annex to the required City's Community Facilities District for Police and Fire Protection, as well as to the new Assessment District for street maintenance, and pay its fair share for construction of Lyon Avenue extension. 22. Prior to issuance of any building permits, paved access to these units shall be provided. 23. Prior to issuance of grading permit or recordation of final map, the landscaping plans for basin, channel, open space, streets, and proposed perimeter wall design shall be reviewed and approved by Planning Commission. 25. This project is located within the flood plain; letter of conditional map revisions and letter of map revision will be required prior to issuance of building and occupancy permits. 26. The developer shall install perimeter walls and slope at westerly and southerly boundary as shown on tentative map cross sections "c-C, and along "B" Street. No landscaping shall be installed westerly of proposed wall as shown on section "C-C." 27. Prior to issuance of any permit or recordation of final map, the proposed improvements shall be reviewed and approved by RCTC in relation to future Hwy. 79 improvement (also refer to letter from RCTC dated July 19, 2004.) 28. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the intersection of Sanderson and "B" Street shall be evaluated for signal. If signal is warranted, the developer shall be responsible for its installation prior to occupancy permit, as recommended by said report. Developer shall receive $150,000 credit towards installation of signal and intersection improvements. 29. Street "A" from Street "B" to northerly boundary of this project shall be improved with concrete curb, gutter, located 32' west of center line within 44' 1/2 width dedicated right-of-way, including installation of 100-year storm drain, crossings at drainage channel and temporary turn around. "A" Street within said reach along east side shall be improved with minimum of 15' paving. 30. Vacation of De Anza Drive, as proposed is subject to existing utility relocation(s). 31 It is assumed that the tentative map correctly shows all existing and proposed easements, right-of-ways. Any deviation and change requires Planning Commission's approval. AUG-03-2004 01:16PM FROM-HOGLE-IRELAND +909 i81 6014 T-990 P.002/004 F-669 iuerside County ransPortation Commission July 19, 2004 Mr. Kenneth Phung, Contract Planner Community Development Department City of San Jacinto 248 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 _ Rimenide ComRegional 14l,tillrrBRddresr: Awr B .12008 • Riverside, C i�� 5112 G Sow 00) 787-7141 • Fax (909) 78. -7920 r,yrarca o� CiTY OF SAN JACINTO JUL 20 2004 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Subject: Tentative Tract Map 31544 and Change of Zone 7-03 Dear Mr. Phung: We have reviewed the revised referenced tentative map submitted on July 2, 2004 to the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and offer the following comments: RCTC agrees with the re -arrangement of the lots as re -drawn by the Asbrook Community Group. This new arrangement of Tots would allow RCTC the potential to construct a half diamond ramp on the future realigned SR 79, Please note; however, that Ashbrook Community Group has only redrawn the lots on the east side of the SR 79 and the lots on the west side still need to be redrawn, RCTC would like to have the opportunity to comment on the future west side lots of this development at the time the plans are submitted to the City for review. Should you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact Gustavo Quintero at (909) 787-7936, Sincerely, Hideo Sug'ita, Deputy Executive Director Riverside County Transportation Commission cc: B, Hughes, G. Quintero (Beohtel), R. Simon (CH2M Hill), SR 79 Files, V: FILESICurrern Design Projects\02.31.043 Rt 79 Praj Apt & Env Dan\CorrsplCorrouL\clty of San Jaeirno javiseei etm 31544 071404.d= AUG-03-2004 01:16PM FROM-HOGLE-IRELAND +909 781 6014 T-990 P.003/004 F-669 PIT i ;1' 7'i ^iF�, 'r ' ) December 23, 2003 COTnt�i�lac �L''c►;,ri f3T Attn: Kenneth Phung Community Development Department City of San Jacinto 248 E Main St San Jacinto CA 92583 SUBJECT: Tentative Tract 31544 — Comments from RTA Riverside Transit Agency 1825 Third Street P.O. Box 59968 Riverside, OA 92517-1988 Phone: (909) 585-5000 Fax: (909) 555-5001 Thank you for the opportunity to review the site plan for Tentative Map #31544, which proposes 135 homes on 42 acres off Sanderson Av in the northwestern portion of San Jacinto. A copy of the RTA internal staff report on the project is attached for your information. Existing RTA bus Route #31 presently operates about 2 mi from the project, at the intersection of Ramona Expwy and State St. By means of #31, connections can be made to the entire RTA system. However, due to its relatively isolated position, having potential circulation challenges for transit, T-31544 is not likely to have on -site transit service from RTA in the foreseeable future. (See the attached staff report). RTA has no transit amenity or pedestrian access issues relative to the submittal and approves of the project. If you need additional clarification or I can be of further assistance, please call me at (909) 565- 5164 or contact me online at mmccovCcr�riversidetransit.com. Sincerely, Michael McCoy Senior Planner F:ldata\Planning\MikeM\Word\Dev Review\San Jacinto120031RTA lir - T-31544.doc AUG-03-2004 01:16PM FROM-HOGLE-IRELAND +909 781 6014 T-990 P.004/004 F-669 To: From: Subject: Riverside 7hansit Agency PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Anne Palatino, Director of Planning Michael McCoy, Senior Planner City of San Jacinto, Review of Tentative Tract 31544, 135 acres, east of Sanderson Av and south of Ramona Expwy; Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) Comments Bus routes involved: None. December 23, 2003 OF SAN JACI ITo i;PI2003 C, EfARrt,AE NT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT residential units on 42 Summary: Ashbrook Communities proposes tentative map T-31544 and a related case for 135 homes on 42 acres in what Is now a relatively remote portion of northwestern San Jacinto. Access to and through the tract would be difficult for transit. Also, the map indi- cates the proposed CETAP "Route 79" Expressway will be constructed adjacent to the project. T-31544 is about 2 mi from the nearest RTA bus, Route 31, at State St and Ramona Expwy. No transit routes are anticipated in the future at or near this tract; however, the neighborhood will eventually be served by transit either on Sanderson Av, Ramona Expwy, or the CETAP Corridor. RTA has no transit amenity or pedestrian access issues regarding this project and will send a letter of approval to the City. INITIAL REVIEW INFORMATION - Review completed date: December 23, 2003. Documents received at RTA: November 20, 2003; Reply -by Date: December 5, 2003; Project Review Committee mtg: November 20, 2003; Planning Commission hearing Date: unknown or N/A; City Council Date: Unknown or N/A; Thomas Guide Map pg and grid: 780, F-5,6; Case Numbers: Tentative map T-31544; Zone Change 7-03; Case Planner: Kenneth Phung, (909) 787-9222; Applicant: Ashbrook Communities of Carlsbad, CA RTA PLANNING FOLLOW-UP: 1' Standard "Acceptable" letter to jurisdiction without comments Letter with comments advising project modifications re transit issues Verbal conversation with Case Planner and appropriate letter follow-up Letter sent Date: ji�23f of File name: F:ldata\Plann g\MikeM\Word\Dev ReviewlSan Jacinto120031RTAltr-T-31544.doo SECOND REVIEW: Review materials placed in archive files: Date: I7123/o 3 P:ldata\Planning\MikeM\Word\Dev ReviewlSan Jacinto\20031T-31544.doc Exhibit D CITY OF SAN JACINTO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM: INITIAL STUDY Project Case Type (s) and Number(s): Zone Change 7-03, Tentative Tract Map 31544, and Variance -04 Lead Agency Name: City of San Jacinto Address: 248 E. Main Street Contact Person: Kenneth Phung, Contract Planner Telephone Number: 909-787-9222 Applicant's Name: Joel Morse, T&B Planning Consultants Address: 17542 E. 17th Street, Suite 100 Tustin, CA 92780 I. PROJECT INFORMATION A. Project Description (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to project grading, later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation): Proposal to change the zoning designation on 41.17 gross acres from LDR to R-1, in order to subdivide the property into 134 single-family lots with minimum lot sizes of 7,200 square feet and an open space lot at east side of the proposed SR79 Freeway and south of De Anza Drive. However, one of the lots will require a Variance for the lot size. The tract has been designed to be consistent with the layout of the proposed SR-79 Freeway alignment, and is in the Sunrise Ranch Neighborhood with a General Plan designation of LDR. B. Type of Project: Site Specific ®; Citywide ❑; Community 0; Policy ❑. Two or more of the above may apply. A Site Specific Project involves fewer than 1000 property owners in a definable area and results in a change in existing land uses, zoning, open space designations or Community Plan land use designations. If Site Specific Project was checked, fill out the remainder of this page. If Site Specific Project was not checked and the project covers a defined area, fill in only Item C "Total Project Area" and G below. C. Total Project Area: 41.17 gross acres To the extent possible, fill out the remaining information for Item "C" as it applies to the project. Residential: Acres 41.17 ; Lots 134 ; Units 134 Commercial: Acres ; Lots ; Sq. Ft. of Bldg. Area Industrial: Acres ; Lots ; Sq. Ft. of Bldg. Area Other: An open space lot ; Projected No. of residents: 375 ; Est. No. of Employees ; Est. No. of Employees D. Assessor's Parcel No(s): 431-020-008 Street References: East of proposed Highway 79 and south of De Anza Drive. F. Section, Township & Range Description or reference/attach a Legal ,ascription: A portion of Farm Lots 129 and 133 of the Lands of the San Jacinto Land Association, M.B. 8/357, ..ecords of San Diego County, California. G. Brief description of the existing environmental setting of the project site and its surroundings: The property is currently being used for agriculture and is generally flat. Surrounding uses include agriculture on the south, east, and west sides with dairy facilities to the north. The project site abuts the proposed future alignment of Highway 79 along its west property line. 2 II. APPLICABLE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE POLICIES AND ZONING This page must only be completed for proposals that qualify as Site Specific Projects. The information on this page is not squired for projects that are not Site Specific; however, completion of this section is encouraged. A. Open Space and Conservation Map Designation(s): Not applicable B. Land Use Planning Area (L.U.P.A.) Information 1. L. U. P. A. Name(s): Not applicable 2. Subarea, if any: Not applicable 3. Community Policy Area, if any: Not applicable C. Community Plan Land Use Allocation Map Information 1. Community Plan, if any: Not applicable 2. Community Plan Land Use Designation, if any: Not applicable D. Adopted Specific Plan Information 1. Name and Number of Specific Plan, if any: Sunrise Ranch Specific Plan No. 1-91 (Since expired) 2. Specific Plan Planning Area, and Policies, if any: Not applicable E. Existing Zoning: LDR F. Proposed Zoning, if any: LDR G. Adjacent and Surrounding Zoning: North: LDR South: LDR East: LDR West: LDR III. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: le environmental factors checked below (■ ) would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact mat is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Hazards & Hazardous Materials X Public Services Agriculture Resources X Hydrology/Water Quality X Recreation X Air Quality Land Use/Planning X Transportation/Traffic Biological Resources Mineral Resources Utilities/Service Systems Cultural Resources X Noise Other X Geology/Soils Population/Housing Mandatory Findings of Significance IV. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: 4 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/NEGATIVE DECLARATION WAS NOT PREPARED I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project, described in this document, have been made or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. A PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/NEGATIVE DECLARATION WAS PREPARED I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment NOTHING FURTHER IS REQUIRED because all potentially significant effects (a) have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable legal standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. I find that although all potentially significant effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable legal standards, some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in California Code of Regulations, Section 15162 exist. An ADDENDUM to a previously certified EIR or Negative Declaration has been prepared and will be considered by the approving body or bodies. 4 I find that at least one of the conditions described in California Code of Regulations, Section 15162 exist, but I further find that only minor additions or changes are necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation; therefore a SUPPLEMENT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required that need only contain the information necessary to make the previous EIR adequate for the project as revised. I find that at least one of the following conditions described in California Code of Regulations, Section 15162, exist and a SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any the following - (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or altematives; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR or negative declaration would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives. Signature Kenneth Phung, Contract Planner Printed Name EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: Date For TIM HULTS, Community Development Director 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in its explanation following each question. A "No Impact' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e. g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e. g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation incorporated, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact' entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." 5 The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from "Earlier Analyses" as cited in Section VI may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. California Code of Regulations, Section 15063 (c) (3) (D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: (a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. (b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address the site -specific conditions for the project. 6) References to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances) should be included. Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The explanation of each issue should identify: (a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and (b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. (c) 6 V. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ASSESSMENT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 - 21178.1), tiffs Initial Study has been prepared to analyze the proposed project to determine any potential significant impacts upon le environment that would result from construction and implementation of the project. In accordance with California Code of Regulations, Section 15063, this Initial Study is a preliminary analysis prepared by the Lead Agency, the City of San Jacinto, in consultation with other jurisdictional agencies, to determine whether a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, or an Environmental Impact Report is required for the proposed project. The purpose of this Initial Study is to inform the decision -makers, affected agencies, and the public of potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the proposed project. Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated AESTHETICS Would the aroiect 1. Scenic Resources a) Have a substantial effect upon a scenic highway corridor within which it is located? X b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings and unique or landmark features; obstruct any prominent scenic vista or view open to the public; or result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? X Source: Site Visit Findings of Fact: The site is used for agriculture, as are the adjoining properties to the north, south, west and east. This area is being developed into residential and will eventually phase out the current agricultural use. No surrounding residences exist to be impacted by the construction of the proposed development. Therefore, no significant impacts to scenic resources are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A 2. Other Lighting Issues a) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X b) Expose residential property to unacceptable light levels? X 7 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: Site Visit Findings of Fact: The project will slightly elevate levels of light and glare due to night lighting. However, only lighting that is commonly associated with a development of this type is proposed and considered to be within acceptable levels; therefore no significant impacts associated with lighting is anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A AGRICULTURE RESOURCES Would the project 3. Agriculture a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? X b) Conflict with existing agricultural use, or a Williamson Act (agricultural preserve) contract (Riverside County Agricultural Land Conservation Contract Maps)? X c) Cause development of non-agricultural uses within 300 feet of agriculturally zoned property? X d) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? X Source: San Jacinto General Plan (MEA-IV-15), Site Visit Findings of Fact: The project site falls within an area of agricultural use. Despite the suitability of the soils for farming on the property, urbanization in the community, high cost of water and pressures for additional development severely constrain the viability of agriculture as a dominant land use. The transition of agricultural uses to more urbanized uses is expected and is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated on agricultural resources. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated AIR QUALITYwould the project 4. Air Quality Impacts a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? X d) Expose sensitive receptors that are located within 1 mile of the project site to project substantial point source emissions? X e) Involve the construction of a sensitive receptor located within one mile of an existing substantial point source emitter? X f) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X 9 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: The Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) sets forth a comprehensive program that will lead the SCAB into compliance with all federal and state air quality standards. The AQMP control measures and related emission reduction estimates are based upon emissions projections for a future development scenario derived from land use, population, and employment characteristics defined in consultation with local governments. Accordingly, conformance with the AQMP for development projects is determined by demonstrating compliance with local land use plans and/or population projections. For the proposed project, the proposed tentative tract map is consistent with the underlying general plan designation and zoning. Grading activities will generate short-term dust, smoke and odors. These will be short-term in nature and will cease when construction is completed. The construction of 134 new single-family dwellings will result in additional motor vehicle trips in the area. Individually, this development will not have a significant impact on air quality in the SCAB, but the project will incrementally contribute to the overall air quality degradation in the SCAB. However, with the proposed mitigation measures identified below there will be less of a significant impact on air quality. Mitigation: The site shall be watered to control dust during construction and grading. Also, there will be regular street sweeping and clean up of adjacent streets. Mud and dirt shall be removed from construction equipment and vehicles prior to leaving the site. An energy conservation plan showing compliance with Title 24 (Building Standards) of the California Administrative Code shall also be provided. This plan will identify conservation measures. Assistance with preparing this document will come from the Southern California Edison Company. Monitoring: Building Department L RESOURCES Would the project 5. Wildlife & Vegetation a) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat X Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state conservation plan? b) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any endangered, or threatened species, as listed in Title 14 of the X California Code of Regulations (Sections 670.2 or 670.5) or in Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations (Sections 17.11 or 17.12)? 10 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact c) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Wildlife Service? X d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X f) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X g) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X Source: "General Biological Resources Assessment" by Natural Resources Assessment, Inc. dated October 2, 2003. Findings of Fact: No riparian areas exist on the project site, but one does exist adjacent to the northeastern property line. However, no impact is expected to this area during project implementation because no off -site disturbance is proposed for this area. No raptor nesting areas exist on the property. No wildlife corridors were identified. Therefore, no significant impacts to biological resources are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A L RESOURCES Would the project 6. Historic Resources a) Alter or destroy an historic site? X b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in California Code of Regulations, Section 15064.5? X 11 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: Historic Resource Inventory (Riverside County, 1981), Site Visit Findings of Fact: The property has been used for agriculture and does not have any significant historical value and was not included in the Historic Resource Inventory completed in 1981. Therefore, no significant impacts to historic resources are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A Archaeological Resources a) Alter or destroy an archaeological site. X b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Section 15064.5? X c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X d) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? X Source: Site Visit Findings of Fact: Staffs survey of the site did not find any Archaeological Resources; nor has farming in the vicinity of the project site exposed any Archaeological Resources; therefore, no impacts to Archeological Resources are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A 8. Paleontological Resources Directly or indirectly destroy a unique X paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? 12 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: Site Visit Findings of Fact: Staffs survey of the site did not find any Paleontological Resources, nor has farming in the vicinity of the project site exposed any Paleontological Resources; The project is not anticipated to have any impacts on Paleontological Resources. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A GEOLOGY AND SOILS Definitions for Land Use Suitability Ratings Where indicated below, the appropriate Land Use Suitability Rating(s) has been underlined. NA - Not Applicable X S - Generally Suitable PS - Provisionally Suitable U - Generally Unsuitable R - Restricted a) Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 9. Alquist-Priolo Special Studies or County Fault Hazard Zones Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? A-P Zones NA S PS ✓ U R CFH Zones NA S PS V U R Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: There are no known faults on the project site; but the project site is within 2,000 feet of a Special Study Zone Boundary and is subject to ground shaking during earthquake activities. However, no significant impacts from fault hazards are anticipated with compliance with the building codes. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A 13 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 10. Liquefaction Potential Zone Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? NA S ✓ PS U R X Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: The project site is not located in area where liquefaction is known to occur. Therefore, no impacts due to liquefaction are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A 11. Groundshaking Zone Strong seismic ground shaking? X NA S PS ✓ U R Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: The project site is located within an area anticipated to have strong ground shaking after an earthquake due to its proximity to an Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zone. However, compliance with the standard building code will reduce any impact to non -significant. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A 12. Landslide Risk NA S PS U R Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, collapse, or rockfall hazards? X 14 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: Site Visit Findings of Fact: The project site is flat and not located in an area known for landslides, therefore no impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A 13. Ground Subsidence Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a X result of the project, and potentially result in ground subsidence? Source: Site Visit, San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: Ground subsidence is recognized as problem occurring in the City. However, a detailed soils investigation is required prior to issuance of grading or building permits to address any special requirements to reduce any impact to non -significant. Mitigation: A soil report shall be submitted to the Building Department prior to building permits, and all requirements identified in the report shall be adhered to. Monitoring: Building 14. Other Geologic Hazards Such as seiche, mudflow or volcanic hazard? Source: Site Visit Findings of Fact: The site is not located in an area that is known to be subject to seiche, mudflow or volcanic hazards; therefore, no impacts due to geologic hazards are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A t: 15. Slopes a) Change topography or ground surface relief features? X b) Create cut or fill slopes greater than 2:1 or higher than 10 feet? X 15 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact c) Result in grading that affects or negates subsurface sewage disposal systems? X Source: Plan Review Findings of Fact: The project site is relatively flat and will require grading to provide for drainage. The grading is not anticipated to create significant slopes; therefore no significant impacts due to slopes are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A 16. Soils a) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X b) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: Collapsible soils are common phenomenon in the San Jacinto Valley. This impact commonly occurs when the soils are wetted during a rainstorm. To mitigate this impact to non -significant a specific geotechnical engineering investigation shall be conducted to determine the appropriate mitigations prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Mitigation: A geotechnical engineering report shall be submitted to the City Engineer prior to grading permits, and all requirements identified in the report shall be adhered to. Monitoring: City Engineer 17. Erosion a) Change deposition, siltation or erosion that may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of a lake? X b) Result in any increase in water erosion either on or off site? X 16 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: Due to the lack of existing and proposed slope on the site, heavy rains are not anticipated to create a significant impact to erosion. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A 18. Wind Erosion and Blowsand from project either on or off site X Be impacted by or result in an increase in wind erosion and blowsand, either on or off site? Source: Riverside County General Plan Findings of Fact: The proposed project is not located in a desert area that is subject to significant wind erosion or blowing sand, therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project 19. Hazards and Hazardous Materials a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? X d) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X 17 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact e) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: The project does not have any elements that would create a significant hazard or interfere with emergency response plans, and is not included on the list complied in accordance with CA Government Code Section 65962.5 (Cortese List). Therefore, no impacts with hazardous materials are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A 20. Airports a) Result in an inconsistency with an Airport Master Plan? X b) Require review by the Airport Land Use Commission?. X c) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X d) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, or heliport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: The project site is not located within an airport control zone; therefore, no impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A I8 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 21. Hazardous Fire Area Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X Source: Riverside County General Plan Findings of Fact: The project site is not in a high fire hazard area; therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the project 22. Water Quality Impacts a) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off - site? X b) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? X c) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X d) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X e) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X 19 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact f) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? X g) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X Source: Plan Review, San Jacinto General Plan, and "Flood Plain Analysis" by Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. dated October 14, 2003. Findings of Fact: The project site is not within a 100-year floodplain as shown on FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map. The project will result in a change to the existing pattern in the area and increase the amount of impervious area on the project site; however, the proposal includes drainage facilities to retain stormwater and nuisance run-off that should serve to mitigate any impacts that may be created by the project. The project will be required to comply with adopted BMP's (Best management practices) to eliminate or reduce the potential impacts to water quality to a level of insignificance. The project will contribute to cumulative ground water depletion in the area; however, the project is consistent with the future growth envisioned by the adopted general plan. Therefore, the project proposal is not anticipated to have significant negative impacts due to water quality. Mitigation: The project shall incorporate BMP's as required by the City Engineer. Monitoring: City Engineer 23. Floodplains NA U R X a) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off -site? b) Changes in absorption rates or the rate and amount of surface runoff? X c) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam (Dam Inundation Area)? X d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? X 20 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: Site Visit, Plan Review, and "Flood Plain Analysis" by Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. dated October 14, 2003. Findings of Fact: The project will result in an increase in non -permeable area, thereby altering the existing drainage pattern of the undeveloped site. The project includes facilities to mitigate potential impacts due to floodplains to a level of insignificance. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to have any significant impact on the environment due to floodplains. Mitigation: Drainage facilities shall be provided in accordance with City policy and as approved by the City Engineer. Monitoring: City Engineer LAND USE/PLANNING Would the project 24. Land Use a) Result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X b) Affect land use within a city sphere of influence and/or within adjacent city or county boundaries? X Source: San Jacinto General Plan, San Jacinto Zoning Ordinance, Plan Review Findings of Fact: The proposed density of single-family development is less than that allowed by the San Jacinto General Plan for "Low Density Residential (LDR)" designation with 3.25 units to the acre proposed versus 5 per acre permitted by code. The proposed R-1 zoning is also consistent with the current general plan designation. Therefore, there are no anticipated impacts due to land use. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A 25. Planning a) Be consistent with the site's existing or proposed zoning? X b) Be compatible with existing surrounding zoning? X c) Be compatible with existing and planned surrounding land uses? X d) Be consistent with the land use designations and policies of the Comprehensive General Plan (including those of any applicable Specific Plan)? X 21 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? X Source: San Jacinto General Plan, San Jacinto Zoning Ordinance, Plan Review Findings of Fact: The proposal is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The surrounding zoning designations are residential with existing or proposed residential related uses that are compatible with the residential subdivision. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A MINERAL RESOURCES Would the project 26. Mineral Resources a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource in an area classified or designated by the State that would be of value to the region or the residents of the State? X b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X c) Be an incompatible land use located adjacent to a State classified or designated area or existing surface mine? X d) Expose people or property to hazards from proposed, existing or abandoned quarries or mines? X Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: In accordance with the San Jacinto General Plan, no significant mineral resources have been identified. The nearest areas of mineral resources are located adjacent to the San Jacinto River, where there are several sand and gravel extraction operations. Therefore, no significant impacts to mineral resources are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated NOISE Would the project result in Definitions for Noise Acceptability Ratings Where indicated below, the appropriate Noise Acceptability Rating(s) has been underlined. NA - Not Applicable A - Generally Acceptable B - Conditionally Acceptable C - Generally Unacceptable D - Land Use Discouraged 27. Airport Noise a) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X NA ✓ A B C D b) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X NA✓ A B C D Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: The project is not located within the flight pattern of any existing airports or airstrips. Therefore no impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A 28. Railroad Noise X NA✓ A B C D Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: The project is not located near any railroads; therefore, no impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: NIA 23 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 29. Highway Noise NA A B C D X Source: San Jacinto General Plan and Noise Study dated 3-26-04 Findings of Fact: The proposal will result in a cumulative increase in the ambient noise level caused by an increased number of vehicle trips and the future alignment of Highway 79 adjacent to the site. The new noise decibel will increase to a level considered significant per the San Jacinto General Plan. To mitigate this impact to non -significant the applicant is proposing an additional buffer area of 32 feet beyond the 184-feet right-of-way recommended by CalTrans and will have a minimum 8-foot high decorative block wall adjacent to the freeway and 6-foot high wall along "A" and "B" Streets to reduce any noise impact to non -significant. The footing for the block wall will also be designed to able to increase the height of the wall to 20-feet high in the event the freeway is built to reduce noise impact to non -significant. Mitigation: A wall and landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permit. The wall along the freeway shall have 32-foot buffer adjacent to the freeway with an 8-foot high decorative block wall designed to be able to increase the height of the wall to 20-feet. Monitoring: Planning Department 30. Other Noise X NA A B C D Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: There were no other significant noise generators or receptors identified in the area. Therefore no impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: NIA 31. Noise Effects on or by the Project a) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X b) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X 24 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact c) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X d) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground -borne vibration or ground -borne noise levels? X Source: San Jacinto General Plan and Noise Study dated 3-26-04 Findings of Fact: The proposal will result in a cumulative increase in the ambient noise level caused by an increased number of vehicle trips and the future alignment of Highway 79 adjacent to the site. The new noise decibel will increase to a level considered significant per the San Jacinto General Plan. To mitigate this impact to non -significant the applicant is proposing an additional buffer area of 32 feet beyond the 184-feet right-of-way recommended by CalTrans and will have a minimum 8-foot high decorative block wall adjacent to the freeway and 6-foot high wall along "A" and "B" Streets to reduce any noise impact to non -significant. The footing for the block wall will also be designed to able to increase the height of the wall to 20-feet high in the event the freeway is built to reduce noise impact to non -significant. Mitigation: A wall and landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of any building permit. The wall along the freeway shall have 32-foot buffer adjacent to the freeway with an 8-foot high decorative block wall designed to be able to increase the height of the wall to 20-feet. Monitoring: Planning Department POPULATION AND HOUSING would the project 32. Housing a) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X b) Create a demand for additional housing, particularly housing affordable to households earning 80% or less of the County's median income? X c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X d) Affect a City Redevelopment Project Area? X e) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? X 25 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact f) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: This project will include 134 residential dwelling units and will require extension of utilities, sewer and water services, which will be constructed by the developer. Payment of Capital Facilities fees will mitigate the cumulative impacts to roads and infrastructure. No significant impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 33. Fire Services Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: The project will result in an incremental increase in demand for fire services. The City has adopted Fire Station mitigation fees; however, these fees are insufficient to cover the costs of additional facilities, equipment and service personnel. To compensate for this shortfall, formation of a district to fund essential fire services is being considered. If such a district is formed, it is anticipated that any significant negative impacts due to fire services would be mitigated to a level of insignificance. Mitigation: The applicant or successor in interest shall join future districts' that are formed to provide essential fire services. Monitoring: Planning 34. Police Services 26 1 X 1 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: The project site is within the jurisdiction of the San Jacinto Police Department. A ratio of one police officer per 1,000 residents is desirable in the City. The proposed 134 dwellings will result in approximately 375 residents, and approximately 0.38 additional police officers to maintain the desired ratio. The City has adopted public Safety mitigation fees; however, these fees are insufficient to cover the cost of providing additional facilities, equipment and service personnel. To compensate for this shortfall, formation of a district (Mello -Roos) to fund essential public safety services is being considered. If such a district is formed, it is anticipated that any significant negative impacts due to public safety services would be mitigated to a level of insignificance. Mitigation: The applicant or successor in interest shall join any future districts' that are formed to provide essential police services. Monitoring: Planning 35. Schools Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: Schools in the area have exceeded their capacity; re -locatable classrooms have been installed to provide classrooms for overflow students. Therefore the proposed residential development will result in a significant impact on schools within the School District. To mitigate this impact to a non -significant level, payment of school fees will be collected as required by state law, in addition to payment of a "Mello -Roos Community Facilities District" fee established between the School District and the City of San Jacinto to pay approximately 70 to 80-percent of the cost to construct new schools within the annexation area to meet the demand of the increased growth. Mitigation: Fees shall be paid into the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities District" and school fees in accordance with State law. Monitoring: Building Department 36. Libraries Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: The project proposal will result in an incremental increase in demand for libraries, however, the size of the project is such that the anticipated impact should be not be significant. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A 37. Health Services 27 X Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: The project proposal will result in an incremental increase in demand for health services, however, the size of the project is such that the anticipated impact should not be significant. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A RECREATION 38. Parks and Recreation a) Would the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X b) Would the project include the use of existing neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X c) Is the project located within a C.S.A. or recreation and park district with a Community Parks and Recreation Plan (Quimby fees)? X Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: Approval of the tract will result in an increase demand for recreational facilities. However, the Annexation Study Area designates some land to be preserved as open space and additional areas to be developed as park and recreational facilities. Payment of park fees to acquire and develop the recommended parks will mitigate any impact to a non -significant level. Mitigation: Payment of park fees in accordance with the San Jacinto Municipal Code. Monitoring: Building Department 39. Recreational Trails. 28 Potentially Significant Impact Source: San Jacinto General Plan Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Findings of Fact: The project is proposing a grass -lined drainage channel along the northern property line. A trail/bike path will be provided in conformance with the standards set forth in the Northwest Improvement Project. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Would the project 40. Circulation a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? X b) Result in inadequate parking capacity? X c) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated road or highways? X d) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? X e) Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic? X f) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? X g) Cause an effect upon, or a need for new or altered maintenance of roads? X h) Cause an effect upon circulation during the project's construction? X i) Result in inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? X j) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? X 29 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: San Jacinto General Plan and Traffic Study dated 3-26-04 Findings of Fact: The project is providing all required street improvements and access. Two access points are provided to allow traffic flow onto nearby arterial streets as required by the City Engineer. Although the project will result in additional trips on the City transportation grid, the increase in traffic is well within the carrying capacity of the nearby streets. The project is also required to pay traffic signal mitigation fees, which should serve to mitigate potential impacts to intersections. In addition, per the Traffic Study prepared for the project dated 3-26-04 the following conditions are required: 1) a traffic signal is required to be installed at the intersection of Sanderson Avenue and Ramona Boulevard at the beginning of the project, 2) 30-foot pavement road on "B" Street to Lyon Avenue (unless otherwise determined by the City Engineer) and, 3) conduct a traffic signal warrant at "B" Street and Sanderson Avenue. Therefore, impacts to transportation and traffic will be mitigated to a less than significant level. Mitigation: Traffic Signal Mitigation fees shall be paid in accordance with established City policy. In addition, the project is required to 1) install a traffic signal at the intersection of Sanderson Avenue and Ramona Boulevard, 2) 30-foot pavement road on "B" Street to Lyon Avenue (unless otherwise determined by the City Engineer), and 3) conduct a traffic signal warrant at "B" Street and Sanderson Avenue. Monitoring: Building Department 41. Bike Trails Source: San Jacinto General Plan Findings of Fact: The project is proposing a grass -lined drainage channel along the northern property line. A trail/bike path will be provided in conformance with the standards set forth in the Northwest Improvement Project. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A UTILITY AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project 42. Water a) Require or result in the construction of new water treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects? X b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X 30 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: City Engineer Findings of Fact: The project is located in the Eastern Municipal Water District service area. There is no unusual water demand features proposed as part of the project. Water service will be available to lots within the subdivision after the appropriate plans have been approved and fees paid. Therefore, there are no anticipated significant impacts due to water service. Mitigation: None Monitoring: None 43. Sewer a) Require or result in the construction of new wastewater treatment facilities, including septic systems, or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects? X b) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may service the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? X Source: City Engineer Findings of Fact: The project is located in the Eastern Municipal Water District service area. There is no unusual sanitary sewer demand features proposed as part of the project. Sanitary sewer service will be available to lots within the subdivision after the appropriate plans have been approved and fees paid. Therefore, there are no anticipated significant impacts due to sanitary sewer service. Mitigation: None Monitoring: None 44. Solid Waste a) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? X b) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid wastes (including the X CIWMP (County Integrated Waste Management Plan)? 31 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: City of San Jacinto Findings of Fact: The city provides solid waste disposal services on a contractual basis. There is no unusual waste disposal demand features proposed as part of the project. Waste disposal service will be available to lots within the subdivision. During construction, contractors may use multiple waste disposal sites located through out Riverside County. Therefore, there are no anticipated significant impacts due to waste disposal. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A 45. Utilities Would the project impact the following facilities requiring or resulting in the construction of new facilities or the expansion of existing facilities; the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? a) Electricity? X b) Natural gas? X c) Communications systems? X d) Storm water drainage? X e) Street lighting? X f) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X g) Other governmental services? X h) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? X Source: Planning Department Findings of Fact: In accordance with State law, the project plans have been forwarded to the appropriate service providers. None of the service providers have indicated that they would not be able to provide service to the project. Any comments received from the utilities have been forwarded to the applicant. Therefore, there are no anticipated significant impacts to utilities. Mitigation: None Monitoring: N/A OTHER 46. Other: Not Used 32 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: Findings of Fact: Mitigation: Monitoring: 47. Other: Not Used Source: Findings of Fact: Mitigation: Monitoring: 48. Other: Not Used Source: Findings of Fact: Mitigation: Monitoring: MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 49. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining X levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare, or endangered plant or animal to eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Source: This initial study document Findings of Fact: No significant impacts on the environment or habitat of fish or wildlife are anticipated. 33 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated 50. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of Tong -term environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is X one that occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) Source: This initial study document Findings of Fact: No significant long or short-term environmental impacts are anticipated. 51. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects as defined in California X Code of Regulations, Section 15130)? Source: This initial study document Findings of Fact: No significant cumulative impacts are anticipated. 52. Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on X human beings, either directly or indirectly? Source: This initial study document Findings of Fact: No direct or indirect significant negative impacts are anticipated. VI. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. California Code of Regulations, Section 15063 (c) (3) (D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: Earlier Analyses Used, if any: None ' ocation Where Earlier Analyses, if used, are available for review: N/A 34 R-1 (PUD) Change of Zone 7-03 Q background . • . City LimitsCitylimits.shp Clines.shp Zoning A i C-1 C-2 C-M City Well D-C D-R EMWD Fire Station M-1 M-I-P ® Open Space ® Park ® Park Hill FT R-1 R-1 15,000 R-1 20,000 R-1 PUD R-2 R-2 PUD R-3 ;i R-P R-T —7 RAAB Rancho San Jacin S-D School SP 1-85 [ SP 1-91 W-2 j Cove SP Trails SP i r TO: FROM: SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM 3• September 16, 2004 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Special Tax Consultant and City Attorney Approve and adopt Resolution No. Confirming Assessment and Ordering Road, Street and Highway Maintenance for the Annexation of Certain Property into Assessment District No. 2003-1. (AD 2003-1, Annexation No. 3) RECOMMENDATION: By motion, approve and adopt Resolution No. annexing territory into Assessment District No. 2003-1, confirming the levy of assessments therein and ordering the maintenance of roads streets and highways. AD 2003-1, Annexation No. 3 commonly referred to as Tract 30462. BACKGROUND: On August 19, 2004, the City Council initiated proceedings to annex certain territory owned by Greystone Homes, Inc. into Assessment District 2003-1 (the "District"). In order to complete such proceedings in accordance with assessment district law, the City Council must approve the annexation, confirm the assessment as provided for in the engineer's report and approve the assessment diagram, and order the maintenance of roads, streets and highways within the District. JUSTIFICATION: The adoption of the resolution is required to complete the annexation process. BUDGETARY IMPACT: The annexation of the Greystone Homes, Inc. property into the District will have a beneficial impact to the City's budget in that, upon implementation of the proposed annexation to the District, it would assist in the funding of the maintenance of certain roads, streets, and highways that would otherwise come from the City's general fund. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No.: Approvals City Manager: Finance Director: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOT TABULATION, FOR THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY TO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 (AD 2003-1) PURSUANT TO THE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982, ORDERING MAINTENANCE WORK THEREIN AND CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT (AD 2003-1, ANNEXATION NO. 3 ) WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, has initiated proceedings for the annexation of certain property into Assessment District 2003- 1 of and levy of the annual assessment within a special benefit district created pursuant to the terms of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4 of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act") referred to as Assessment District 2003-1 (the "District"), Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of Califomia ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act may be referred to collectively herein as the "Assessment Law"), and, WHEREAS, at this time all notice and public hearing requirements have been met relating to the annexation of certain property into the District and the levy of the annual assessments within the District, WHEREAS, the City Council has received and preliminarily approved a reportfrom the Assessment Engineer (the "Assessment Engineer's Report") and this City Council is now satisfied with the assessment and diagram and all other matters as contained in the Assessment Engineer's Report as now submitted for final consideration and approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, as follows: SECTION 1: Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: SECTION 3: Procedures. This City Council hereby finds and determines that the procedures for the consideration of the levy of the assessments have been undertaken in accordance with the Assessment Law. Assessment Ballot Procedures. Assessment ballots were mailed as required by Assessment Law to the record owners of all properties within proposed annexation area which are proposed to be assessed. The assessment ballots that were completed and received by the City Clerk prior to the close of the public hearing have been tabulated in accordance with the procedures established by Assessment Law and this City Council and the results of such tabulation have been submitted to this City Council. This City Council hereby finds that the assessment ballots submitted in favor of the levy of assessments as shown in the Assessment Engineer's Report as weighted in accordance with Assessment Law exceed the assessment ballots submitted in opposition to such levy also as weighted in accordance with Assessment Law. Therefore, no majority protest to the levy of assessments within the District has been found to exist. SECTION 4: Formation of District. This City Council hereby orders the annexation of the property listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto to the District. SECTION 5: Determination and Confirmation. Based upon the Assessment Engineer's Report and the testimony and other evidence presented at the public hearing, the City Council hereby makes the following determinations regarding the maximum assessments proposed to be levied: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each individual parcel to be assessed has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the operations and maintenance expenses. b. The assessments will not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each parcel. c. Only the special benefits will be assessed. d. There are no parcels within the District that are owned or used by a local government, the State of Califomia or the United States. The maximum assessments as shown in the Assessment Engineer's Report will be increased each Fiscal Year without further compliance with the assessment ballot procedures required under the Assessment Law by the annual increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), during the preceding year Page 2 of 4 SECTION 6: SECTION 7: ending in March, for All Urban Consumers for the Riverside County area. Ordering of Maintenance. The public interest and convenience requires, and this legislative body does hereby order the maintenance work to be made and performed as said maintenance work is set forth in the Assessment Engineer's Report and as previously declared and set forth in the Resolution of Intention. Filing with City Clerk. The above -referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Said diagram and assessment, and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. SECTION 8: Effective Date. This Resolution of Formation shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. APPROVED, SIGNED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the 16th day of September, 2004, by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Abstain: City of San Jacinto By: Jim Ayres, Mayor Page 3 of 4 ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, City of San Jacinto Best, Best & Krieger, LLP Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF SAN JACINTO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 NOTICE OF RECORDATION OF ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM STATEMENT OF ASSESSMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to all owners of real property liable to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses of the street and road improvements to be constructed under proceedings conducted by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Benefit Assessment Act of 1982", being Chapter 6.4 of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Government Code of the State of California, for a special assessment district, said special assessment district known and designated as Assessment District No. 2003-1 (the "Assessment District"). You are hereby notified that on September 16, 2004, the Assessment and Diagram to pay the costs and expenses of said construction were recorded in my office. The assessment will be collected on your property tax bill in annual installments beginning in the 2004-2005 fiscal year. The maximum assessment amount for the 2004-2005 fiscal year is as stated in this Notice. DATED: September 16. 2004 Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk City of San Jacinto State of California Identified Parcel: Assessment Number: 2003-1 Assessor's Parcel Number: 431-190-019,431-190-020, 431-190-021 Greystone Homes, Inc. 391 N. Main St., Suite 301 Corona, CA 92880 Confirmed assessment: $ 36,353.19 2004-2005 Fiscal Year * Maximum Assessment: $ 36,353.19 * The maximum amount of the annual assessment will increase beginning July 1, 2005, by an amount equal to the percentage change in the Engineering News -Record Construction Cost Index for Los Angeles, measured as of the month ofDecember in the calendar year which ends in the pervious fiscal year, with a maximum annual increase of 6.0% and a minimum annual increase of 0% of the amount in effect in the previous fiscal year. Page 1 of 1 SHEET 1 OF 2 PROPOSED BOUNDARY MAP ANNEXATION NO. 3 TO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 CITY OF SAN JACINTO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Reference is hereby made to that certain map entitled "Assessment Diagram, Assessment District No. 2003-1, City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of California," filed the 23nd day of December, 2003, at the hour of 8 o'clock a.m. in Book 55 at page 64, and as Instrument number 2003-998200 in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, State of California, which this Annexation Diagram affects. a COTTONWOOD See Sheet 944. .94 ST.. Zone 10 OM RD., i VICINITY MAP PtAQH S I MAIN ST. ESPLA cc VENTH E AVE EA TON T. AVE FRUITVAI E AVE E EVANS T. COMMONWEALTH AVE Y � a Prepared by David Taussig & Associates, Inc. (1) Filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto this _ day of , 2004. Dorothy L. Chouinard, San Jacinto City Clerk (2) I hereby certify that the within map showing the proposed boundaries of Annexation No. 3 to Assessment District No. 2003-1, City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, State of California, was approved by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on this day of 2004, by its Resolution No. Dorothy L. Chouinard, San Jacinto City Clerk (3) Filed this _ day of , 2004, at the hour of o'clock _m, in Book of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at page and as Instrument No. in the office of the County Recorder of Riverside County, State of California. Gary L, Orso Assessor -County Clerk -Recorder of Riverside County By Deputy Fee Exempt recording requested, per CA Government Code §6103 SHEET 2 OF 2 PROPOSED BOUNDARY MAP ANNEXATION NO. 3 TO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 CITY OF SAN JACINTO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Reference is hereby made to the Assessor maps of the County of Riverside for an exact description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel. NDERSON AVE. LEGEND Proposed Boundaries of Annexation No. 3 to Assessment District No. 2003-1 San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA 431-190-Onn Assessor Parcel Number Prepared by David Taussig & Associates, Inc. SEVENTH ST. ESPLANADE AVE. San Jacinto Annexation No. 3 to Assessment District 2003-1 Map Project Guide Boundary Map (Assessment Diagram) Annexation No. 3 Number Zone Assessor Parcel Number(s) Tract Number(s) Project Project Developer Land Owner / Develo er 2 10 431-190-019 431-190-020 431-190-021 30462 Jason Perrin, Greystone Homes, Inc. / Lennar Communities Note: This map project guide is included to help identify properties within the AD, but this guide is not intended for County of Riverside recordation with the Annexation map it refers to. AGENDA ITEM 5.1 September 16, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Bernie SimonlU Finance Director SUBJECT: Approve Warrant Register for Warrants, Prepaid Checks, and Payroll Checks RECOMMENDATION: By motion, approve the warrant register for the warrants and prepaid items and payroll checks issued since the last Council meeting, for the period ending September 16, 2004 BACKGROUND: The following are the warrant and check numbers for this cycle: Warrant/Prepaid # s Cycle Dates Payroll Checks Cycle Date 68584-68722 September 16,2004 16751-16762 September 16,2004 Payroll information is available for Council review in the Finance Department. JUSTIFICATION: All warrants, pre -paid checks and payroll checks require Council approval. BUDGETARY IMPACT: Adequate funds have been budgeted to cover the subject expenses. ATTACHMENTS: 1 — Detailed listing of invoices paid and warrant register. Page 1 of 1 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 09/16/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 68586 9/1/04 Andre landscaping service, inc. 19539 19558 19562 19561 Maint aug 2004 Maint aug 2004 Maint aug 2004 Maint aug 2004 010-7100-410.34-05 301-8833-500.34-05 010-7100-410.34-05 010-6500-425.34-05 25,971.32 2,300.00 480.00 500.00 29,251.32 68587 9/1/04 California state controller's REQUEST 8/31/04 Fees req audit fy03/04 010-1400-414.30-90 100.00 100.00 68588 9/1/04 Gosch ford REQUEST 8/31/04 Pre-paids 055-4170-450.40-45 13,885.74 13,885.74 68589 911/04 Icsc REQUEST 8/30/04 Registration oct 5-7th 096-1700-417.31-20 520.00 520.00 68590 9/1/04 Riverside, county of REQUEST 8/20/04 Pool site # 3474 010-8400-425.33-10 259.00 259.00 68591 9/1/04 Starner, edward I. REQUEST 9/1/04 Week ending 6/29/2004 010-4200-410.10-04 2,617.20 2,617.20 68592 9/1/04 Tri-state seminar on the river REQUEST 8/18/04 REQUEST 8/18/04 Registration 9-23 to 9-25 Registration 9-23 to 9-25 055-4170-450.31-20 050-9000-450.31-20 45.00 90.00 135.00 68593 9/2/04 Tri-lake consultants, inc. 2281 2280 2279 2278 2277 2274 2273 2283 Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services 052-9000-450.40-01 022-4150-410.40-01 022-4150-410.40-01 052-9000-450.40-01 039-4155-410.40-01 054-9000-450.40-01 054-9000-450.40-01 052-9000-450.40-01 10,083.00 1,935.51 3,035.00 2,324.76 700.00 1,007.01 916.13 1,995.00 21,996.41 68594 9/3/04 Rogerjackson REQUEST 9/2/04 Reim boot allowance 050-9000-450.21-35 150.00 150.00 68595 9/3/04 Nugent, richard REQUEST 9/3/04 Reim boot allowance 055-4170-450.21-35 150.00 150.00 68596 9/3/04 At & t 7/22/04 6478 Telephone 010-6500-425.35-16 22.09 22.09 68597 9/3/04 Long beach uniform co. 624989 624992 Uniform supplies Uniform supplies 010-3100-431.21-35 010-3100-431.21-35 153.87 158.12 311.99 68600 9/9/04 Eye care of america REQUEST 9/07/04 REQUEST 9/07/04 Vision ins sept 2004 Vision ins sept 2004 085-0000-202.21-35 065-0000-201.08-64 411.83 154.46 566.29 68601 9/9/04 les-apa REQUEST 9/02/04 Apa lunchoen 010-1700-417.31-20 48.00 48.00 68602 9/9/04 Learning for life REQUEST 8/24/04 Disbursement of funds 065-0000-229.09-12 66.00 66.00 Page 1 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 09/16/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 68603 9/9/04 Pacificare of california REQUEST 9/07/04 REQUEST 9/07/04 REQUEST 9/07/04 Health ins sept 2004 Health ins sept 2004 Health ins sept 2004 085-0000-202.21-39 085-0000-202.21-40 065-0000-201.08-64 16,433.90 1,092.28 6,901.74 24,427.92 68604 9/9/04 Preferred benefit insurance admin. REQUEST 9/07/04 REQUEST 9/07/04 Dental ins sept 2004 Dental ins sept 2004 085-0000-202.21-32 065-0000-201.08-64 2,119.78 524.34 2,644.12 68605 9/9/04 Standard insurance, the REQUEST 9/07/04 Life,ad&d,ltd ins prm 9/4 085-0000-202.21-46 2,403.70 2,403.70 68608 9/16/04 A-1 lock & key service 30120 30158 30113 30127 Office supplies Supplies Supplies Supplies 010-3100-431.33-10 010-3300-431.21-10 010-7100-410.33-10 010-3300-431.40-01 54.31 6.47 197.40 40.38 298.56 68609 9/16/04 Aaron anderson REQUEST 8/18/04 REQUEST 8/18/04 Tri-state seminar Tri-state seminar 050-9000-450.31-20 050-9000-450.31-15 120.00 164.22 284.22 68610 9/16/04 Al's kubota tractor 174607 Supplies 010-4150-410.21-80 18.26 18.26 68611 9/16/04 Alert barricade, inc. 202-713 202-712 202-708 Supplies Supplies Supplies 055-4170-450.21-35 010-4150-410.33-50 021-4150-410.40-01 52.64 109.26 134.69 296.59 68612 9/16/04 Allen tire company 173704 Auto repair 010-3320-431.30-90 112.29 112.29 68613 9/16/04 Alm, mitch REQUEST 8/31/04 REQUEST 8/31/04 Reimbursment Reimbursment 010-3100-431.33-10 010-3100-431.33-10 11.16 25.95 37.11 68614 9/16/04 American citi corp. 1034 1034 1034 July 2004 July 2004 July 2004 010-3300-431.33-50 010-1400-414.33-50 010-3100-431.21-10 4.95 3.95 7.90 16.80 68615 9/16/04 American forensic nurses 18678 Analysis 010-3100-431.34-05 32.00 32.00 68616 9/16/04 Angela's glass and mirror 20564 Supplies 010-1700-417.33-10 126.05 126.05 68617 9/16/04 At & t 08/22/04 6478 Telephone 010-2500-425.35-16 22.09 22.09 68618 9/16/04 B & w pipe & supply 66051 65977 Supplies Supplies 010-7100-410.33-30 010-7100-410.33-30 155.40 211.34 366.74 68619 9/16/04 Beylik drilling REQUEST 8/25/04 Progress payment 4 052-9000-450.40-01 6,150.00 5,535.00 Page 2 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 09/16/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 68619... 9/16/04... Beylik drilling... REQUEST 8/25/04 Less 10% retention 052-0000-210.20-25 -615.00 5,535.00... 68620 9/16/04 Bio-tox laboratories 12234 12224 12560 12568 Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis 010-3100-431.34-05 010-3100-431.34-05 010-3100-431.34-05 010-3100-431.34-05 200.40 124.70 102.00 187.02 614.12 68621 9/16/04 Boot barn 3899 3899 10103 10103 10106 10106 Boot allowance Boot allowance Boot allowance b. jeffs Boot allowance t. mora Boot allowance - m. leach Boot allowance - a. garci 050-9000-450.21-35 010-4150-410.21-35 055-4170-450.21-35 050-9000-450.21-35 010-4150-410.21-35 010-4150-410.21-35 276.05 150.00 140.60 126.06 150.00 150.00 992.71 68622 9/16/04 Buffalo bills/primm resorts REQUEST 8/18/04 REQUEST 8/18/04 Lodging tri-state seminar Lodging tri-state seminar 055-4170-450.31-20 050-9000-450.31-20 90.47 180.94 271.41 68623 9/16/04 Cahuilla district/ies ccapa confere REQUEST 9/01/04 Conference oct 2004 010-1700-417.31-20 395.00 395.00 68624 9/16/04 Ced consolidated electrical 2983-429966 2983-429850 Supplies Supplies 025-7260-410.21-30 025-7260-410.21-30 51.15 26.08 77.23 68625 9/16/04 Chamber of commerce 103947 Membership invest 05/06 010-2500-425.31-25 500.00 500.00 68626 9/16/04 Chevron AUG 31 ,2004 Gasoline 010-3100-431.21-70 20.15 20.15 68627 9/16/04 Christie steel fabrication 7670 Supplies 055-4170-450.33-30 95.84 95.84 68628 9/16/04 Civic stone 2530 Professional services 099-1700-417.30-90 4,633.27 4,633.27 68629 9/16/04 Clarke, cynthia REQUEST 8/16/04 Tuition reimbursement 010-2500-425.31-20 165.90 165.90 68630 9/16/04 Cmrta REQUEST 8/31/04 Cmrta conf registration 010-1701-417.31-20 200.00 200.00 68631 9/16/04 Comserco 01/MA50212588 Maint sept 2004 050-9000-450.34-05 86.10 86.10 68632 9/16/04 Cotton/bridges/association 48171221 Professional servcies 010-1700-417.30-90 7,590.30 7,590.30 68633 9/16/04 Cottonwood growers 1596 Supplies 010-6500-425.34-05 112.06 112.06 68634 9/16/04 Curmi, colleen REQUEST 9/06/04 Water reim acct #20019029 050-0000-229.08-70 20.20 20.20 68635 9/16/04 Dane, pamela REQUEST 9/06/04 Water reim acct#10002654 050-0000-229.08-70 10.72 10.72 68636 9/16/04 Db backflow service 071004F Supplies 010-7100-410.33-30 51.47 51.47 Page 3 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 09/16/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 68637 9/16/04 Dell A90469040 Supplies 010-7400-425.21-10 130.38 130.38 68638 9/16/04 Dewey's electric 8/16/04 8/23/04 Professional servcies Services rendered 010-3100-431.33-10 010-3300-431.40-01 190.00 4,820.20 5,010.20 68639 9/16/04 E.s. babcock & sons, inc. AH40104-278 AH41211-0278 AH41876-0278 AH41802-0278 AH41776-0278 AH42100-0278 AH42094-0278 Supplies Analysis Anaylsis Anaylsis Anaylsis Anaylsis Anaylsis 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 60.00 48.00 1,420.00 20.00 60.00 90.00 30.00 1,728.00 68640 9/16/04 Eastern municipal water district 8/17/04 8985903 8/17/04 7889302 8/17/04 6670302 8/17/04 7889202 8/17/04 9406902 8/17/04 9406802 8/17/04 9406702 8/19/04 4625001 8/19/04 9451303 8/19/04 9626704 8/19/041479860 8/19/041662380 Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7100-410.35-10 301-8833-500.35-10 41.65 7.60 1,381.77 54.74 8.64 100.32 7.11 368.71 1,520.82 309.11 7.11 2,312.32 6,119.90 68641 9/16/04 Eatherly, adam REQUEST 9/06/04 Water reim acct #00000097 050-0000-229.08-70 59.23 59.23 68642 9/16/04 Federal express 1-970-99363 1-970-99363 Postage Postage 039-4155-410.40-01 010-1400-414.21-10 19.16 15.99 35.15 68643 9/16/04 Gaudet design group 832 881 Professional services Supplies 032-7150-410.40-01 080-9100-450.40-01 5,035.73 471.55 5,507.28 68644 9/16/04 Genesis construction REQUEST 8/25/04 REQUEST 8/25/04 Progress payment #22 Less 5% retention 054-9000-450.40-01 054-0000-210.20-25 10,600.00 -530.00 10,070.00 Page 4 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 09/16/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 68645 9/16/04 Hdl software, Ilc 6042 Software licenses 010-1701-417.34-05 600.00 600.00 68646 9/16/04 Helm, josephus REQUEST 8/18/04 REQUEST 8/18/04 Tri-state seminar Tri-state seminar 050-9000-450.31-20 050-9000-450.31-15 120.00 164.22 284.22 68647 9/16/04 Hemet valley pipe & supply 85768 85759 86075 Supplies Supplies Supplies 010-3300-431.40-01 010-3300-431.40-01 010-3300-431.40-01 118.88 143.89 153.68 416.45 68648 9/16/04 Hogle-ireland 7316 7316 7316 7316 7316 7316 7316 7316 7316 7316 7316 7316 7316 7316 7316 7316 7316 Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 2,208.75 255.00 1,645.00 1,828.75 166.25 95.00 552.50 1,041.25 297.50 166.25 127.50 616.25 950.00 212.50 142.50 297.50 977.50 11,580.00 68650 9/16/04 Home depot credit services 158863 3160070 6637-158800 6637-159313 6637-160166 6637-159522 Supplies Supplies Supplies Supplies Supplies Supplies 010-3100-431.33-10 010-3100-431.33-10 010-3100-431.33-10 010-3100-431.33-10 010-3100-431.33-10 010-3100-431.33-10 -51.34 90.35 120.38 204.58 35.92 850.43 2,126.33 Page 5 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 09/16/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 68650... 9/16/04... Home depot credit services... 6637-158863 2138425 0261136 0109651 Supplies Supplies Supplies Supplies 010-3100-431.33-10 010-3300-431.40-01 010-7100-410.33-30 010-7100-410.33-10 439.56 141.75 201.34 93.36 2,126.33... 68651 9/16/04 Horizon water 8/19/04 CITY HA Supplies 010-2500-425.34-05 41.50 41.50 68652 9/16/04 I.b. reprographics 47545 Supplies 010-4149-410.40-01 66.89 66.89 68653 9/16/04 Imsoftech 013625 Supplies 050-1400-414.21-10 71.00 71.00 68654 9/16/04 Industrial tool box 23257 Supplies 050-9000-450.33-30 218.76 218.76 68655 9/16/04 Infosend inc. 14919 Postage 050-1400-414.21-10 264.23 264.23 68656 9/16/04 Inkredible screenprinting 111320098 Supplies 010-3100-431.21-35 234.36 234.36 68657 9/16/04 Inland foundation eng. inc. 8799 Professional services 054-9000-450.40-01 640.00 640.00 68658 9/16/04 Inland water works supply co. 142429 142324 142323 Supplies Supplies Supplies 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 95.26 161.63 161.62 418.51 68659 9/16/04 J & m air conditioning 80695 Services renderd 010-7400-425.34-05 50.00 50.00 68660 9/16/04 Jeffs, bill REQUEST 8/16/04 REQUEST 8/16/04 Tri-state seminar primm Tri-state seminar primm 055-4170-450.31-20 055-4170-450.31-15 120.00 164.22 284.22 68661 9/16/04 Johnson machinery PC000628710 PC000627471 Supplies Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 010-4150-410.33-50 8.64 39.24 47.88 68662 9/16/04 Kelly-moore paint company, inc. 8003136554 8003136714 Supplies Supplies 010-4150-410.33-30 010-4150-410.33-30 53.86 63.15 117.01 68663 9/16/04 La chemcial 296972 296596 Supplies Supplies 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 2,296.41 1,454.15 3,750.56 68664 9/16/04 Lancaster inspection services 04-17 Aug 23,05 to sept 3,2004 010-3300-431.10-04 3,120.00 3,120.00 68665 9/16/04 Lara, elizabeth REQUEST 9/06/04 Water reim acct #00005068 050-0000-229.08-70 5.41 5.41 68666 9/16/04 Long beach uniform co. 626318 628774 630073 Uniforms Uniform supplies Uniform supplies 010-3100-431.21-35 010-3100-431.21-35 010-3100-431.21-35 173.21 160.28 158.12 491.61 Page 6 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 09/16/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 68667 9/16/04 Mayers glass 5260 Supplies 010-1110-411.21-10 116.59 116.59 68668 9/16/04 Mission uniform services, inc. 17912316 17912315 17912313 17912313 17912314 17911377 17911377 17913244 17913246 17913245 Uniform supplies Unfiorm supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Supplies Uniform supplies Supplies 010-4150-410.21-35 010-7100-410.21-35 050-9000-450.21-35 055-4170-450.21-35 010-4200-410.21-10 050-9000-450.21-35 055-4170-450.21-35 010-4200-410.21-10 010-4150-410.21-35 010-7100-410.21-35 49.40 24.57 40.00 24.60 6.07 44.60 20.00 6.07 49.40 24.57 289.28 68669 9/16/04 National business furniture MC8649-KIF MC8649-KIF Office furniture Office furniture 010-3300-431.40-45 010-1700-417.40-45 615.47 774.76 1,390.23 68670 9/16/04 Nbs government finance group LO8190406-PP Professional servcies 102-1400-500.30-90 500.00 500.00 68671 9/16/04 Nunez, jose REQUEST 9/06/04 Water reim acct #20005025 050-0000-229.08-70 4.32 4.32 68672 9/16/04 Overnight industrial 24387 24478 24517 Supplies Supplies Supplies 010-7100-410.33-10 010-7400-425.33-10 010-2500-425.21-10 340.79 227.96 31.93 600.68 68673 9/16/04 Pacific alarm svc., inc. 44677 44677 44677 44677 44677 Alarm services Alarm services Alarm services Alarm services Alarm services 010-4200-410.34-05 010-7100-410.34-05 050-9000-450.34-05 010-2500-425.34-05 010-6500-425.35-16 198.50 18.00 118.50 87.00 38.00 460.00 68674 9/16/04 Paetec communications, inc. STMT 8/22/04 STMT 08/29/04 Telephone Telephone 010-3100-431.35-16 010-2500-425.35-16 2.83 1,108.31 1,111.14 68675 9/16/04 Pasarow, steven REQUEST 8/31/04 Conf/mileage allowance 096-1700-417.31-20 141.55 141.55 68676 9/16/04 Patton automotive AJ135216 Auto repair 010-3300-431.33-50 99.61 99.61 68677 9/16/04 Perma 8/10/04 SEPT 01, 2004 Rev administrative fee 2004-05 workers comp 010-4150-410.33-50 018-2250-419.37-05 50.00 34,878.50 34,928.50 Page 7 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 09/16/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 68678 9/16/04 Pins & needles embroidery 2943 2995 2935 2897 Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies 010-3300-431.21-35 010-3300-431.21-35 010-3100-431.21-10 010-3100-431.21-14 59.80 37.71 102.36 99.67 299.54 68679 9/16/04 Pip printing 70183 71708 71708 71708 Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies 010-2510-425.40-04 400-4150-500.21-10 400-4150-500.21-10 400-4150-500.21-10 555.99 1.26 1.26 1.25 559.76 68680 9/16/04 Pitney bowes inc. 444138 Meter rental 10/04-1/2005 010-2500-425.21-10 203.32 203.32 68681 9/16/04 Pju telecomm 11900 11891 11835 11854 Office supplies Telephone Telephone Telephone 010-2500-425.35-16 010-3100-431.33-10 010-3300-431.40-01 010-3300-431.40-01 60.00 1,266.02 632.93 1,578.16 3,537.11 68682 9/16/04 Press enterprise 2387703 2400121 2336623 2396783 2381793 2368299 2392989 2391833 2405155 Advertisment Advertisment Advertisment Advertisment Advertisment Advertisment Advertisment Advertisment Advertisment 010-1700-417.36-25 010-1700-417.36-25 010-1210-412.36-25 010-1700-417.36-25 026-7190-500.30-90 026-7190-500.30-90 026-7190-500.30-91 026-7190-500.30-91 010-1700-417.36-25 81.75 156.20 903.80 72.95 266.20 236.50 221.10 112.00 112.20 2,162.70 68683 9/16/04 Press enterprise 2343734 Subscription 04/05 52wks 010-2500-425.34-05 102.44 102.44 68684 9/16/04 Pto sales corporation 5242310045 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 416.35 416.35 68685 9/16/04 Quality auto parts D702539 Supplies 050-9000-450.33-50 6.23 6.23 68686 9/16/04 Radisson hotel REQUEST 8/31/04 Cmrta conf fresno 10/2005 010-1701-417.31-20 315.84 315.84 68687 9/16/04 Rayne water conditioning, inc. 19207 2004/2005 010-3100-431.40-45 905.84 905.84 68688 9/16/04 Reliable SK776400 SK490901 Office supplies Office supplies 010-2500-425.21-10 010-1400-414.21-10 254.43 7.79 1,232.70 Page 8 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 09/16/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 68688... 9/16/04... Reliable... SK490902 SK490900 SK490900 SKV63000 SKV25100 ZMT80200 ZMN71100 DK002000 DK002000 DK002000 DK002000 DK002000 SLD68000 Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies 010-1400-414.21-10 050-1400-414.21-10 010-1400-414.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 010-4200-410.21-10 010-4200-410.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 010-3300-431.21-10 010-1700-417.21-10 096-1700-417.21-10 010-3300-431.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 22.04 7.96 37.76 111.63 148.35 12.55 35.47 111.62 60.72 115.02 114.90 114.90 77.56 1,232.70... 68690 9/16/04 Retired plumber & son 19847 Services rendered 010-3300-431.40-01 600.00 600.00 68691 9/16/04 Riverside county fire department 230138 4th qrt fy 03/04 fire pro 010-3200-431.34-05 213,245.79 213,245.79 68692 9/16/04 Rk engineering group, inc. 2004-484 2004-195 Professional services Professional services 010-4100-410.30-98 010-1700-417.30-90 2,449.82 540.00 2,989.82 68693 9/16/04 Rod's automotive performance 140802010 140817007 Auto repair Auto repair 010-3100-431.33-50 010-3100-431.33-50 1,489.58 1,537.19 3,026.77 68694 9/16/04 Rodriguez, mirella REQUEST 8/31/04 Per diem 4 days 010-1701-417.31-20 172.00 172.00 68695 9/16/04 Segala, ofelia REQUEST 8/31/04 Office supplies 010-7400-425.21-10 32.92 32.92 68696 9/16/04 Shred it 5097154 Services rendered 010-3100-431.21-10 85.00 85.00 68697 9/16/04 Smart & final 96825 Professional services 010-2500-425.21-10 147.94 147.94 68698 9/16/04 South kern machinery 611033 611660 Supplies Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 010-4150-410.33-50 310.58 2,487.91 2,798.49 68699 9/16/04 Staples credit plan 45156 68984 36895 39444 Supplies Supplies Supplies Office supplies 024-3100-431.40-45 024-3100-431.40-45 024-3100-431.40-45 024-3100-431.40-45 91.81 43.07 -43.07 463.30 2,003.12 Page 9 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 09/16/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 68699... 9/16/04... Staples credit plan... 41455 41455 41455 81992 39443 38224 38224 82271 82043 82269 Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies 102-1400-500.21-10 010-3300-431.40-45 010-1700-417.21-10 010-3100-431.40-45 010-3100-431.40-45 010-1110-411.21-10 010-1210-412.21-10 010-1400-414.21-10 010-1400-414.21-10 010-1400-414.21-10 292.99 64.52 165.67 258.59 463.30 40.40 23.82 138.72 112.74 -112.74 2,003.12... 68701 9/16/04 State of california dept of justice 486005 Analysis 010-3100-431.34-05 35.00 35.00 68702 9/16/04 Stater bros 1210902 Office supplies 010-1100-411.21-10 17.85 17.85 68703 9/16/04 Strattons janitorial service 9231 9244 9248 9245 9243 Carpet cleaning city hall Cleaning fees aug 2004 Carpet cleaning virgina I Cleaning fees 4/04 virgin Cleaning for aug 04 city 010-2500-425.33-10 010-7400-425.34-05 010-1700-417.34-05 010-1700-417.34-05 010-2500-425.34-05 400.00 700.00 450.00 700.00 575.00 2,825.00 68704 9/16/04 Subbarayan krishnan, m.d. 8/11/04 HASKELL Analysis sj class b 010-1210-412.30-16 265.00 265.00 68705 9/16/04 Sunrise air conditioning 16267 Services rendered 010-1700-417.33-10 256.63 256.63 68706 9/16/04 Taylor, jennifer REQUEST 9/06/04 Water reim acct #70004045 050-0000-229.08-70 91.52 91.52 68707 9/16/04 Terex utilties west 358059 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 748.94 748.94 68708 9/16/04 Tokahuta, patty REQUEST 9/06/04 Water reim acct #70024058 050-0000-229.08-70 58.96 58.96 68709 9/16/04 Traffic control service 244131 Supplies 024-4150-410.21-36 501.90 501.90 68710 9/16/04 Trans union Ilc 07451376 Credit reports 050-1400-414.34-11 113.80 113.80 68711 9/16/04 Tri-lake consultants, inc. 2292 2292 2292 2292 2295 Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services 010-1700-417.30-90 065-0000-201.08-83 065-0000-201.08-10 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 400.00 880.00 1,180.00 2,480.00 2,375.00 87,864.66 Page 10 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 09/16/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 68711... 9/16/04... Tri-lake consultants, inc.... 2296 2303 2343 2342 2340 2300 2301 2302 2299 2298 2297 2294 2293 2304 2291 2291 2291 Professional services Professional servcies Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services 029-8662-417.30-90 065-0000-201.06-45 065-0000-201.06-47 065-0000-201.06-47 065-0000-201.06-47 022-4150-410.40-01 052-9000-450.40-01 052-9000-450.40-01 022-4150-410.40-01 052-9000-450.40-01 039-4155-410.40-01 054-9000-450.40-01 054-9000-450.40-01 022-4150-410.40-01 010-4100-410.30-90 039-4155-410.40-01 010-4100-410.30-94 6,196.97 518.63 4,291.77 1,320.50 38,429.25 1,364.75 7,354.38 2,422.50 2,368.39 95.00 80.00 2,070.63 520.00 2,240.00 4,907.50 390.00 5,979.39 87,864.66... 68713 9/16/04 Twin graphics 408017 Supplies 010-3100-431.33-10 52.80 52.80 68714 9/16/04 Union bank of california REQUEST 8/25/04 5% retention 054-0000-210.20-25 530.00 530.00 68715 9/16/04 United green mark, inc. 5907740 5907739 Supplies Supplies 010-7100-410.33-30 010-7100-410.33-30 155.35 418.69 574.04 68716 9/16/04 Valley diesel 4032 Auto repair 010-4150-410.33-50 1,805.96 1,805.96 68717 9/16/04 Valley party equipment rental 11260 Equipment rental 010-2510-425.40-12 369.62 369.62 68718 9/16/04 Westech industries REQUEST 9/6/04 REQUEST 9/6/04 Reimburse dep # 00000103 Reimburse dep # 00000103 050-0000-229.08-70 050-0000-308.09-10 450.00 126.92 576.92 68719 9/16/04 Western highway products 358638 Supplies 021-4150-410.40-01 2,207.36 2,207.36 68720 9/16/04 Western riverside council 013-8-23-2004 Professional servcies 010-2500-425.31-25 1,535.00 1,535.00 68721 9/16/04 Wetworks pool care STMT 9/1/04 Sept 2004 monthly maint 010-8400-425.33-10 1,918.48 1,918.48 68722 9/16/04 Williams, randy REQUEST 8/31/04 Conf/mileage allowance 096-1700-417.31-20 141.55 141.55 Page 11 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 09/16/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total Total Checks 553,002.62 Page 12 AGENDA ITEM 5'c=7 September 16, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Bernie Simon, Finance Director Jack Templeton, Accountant SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report at July 31, 2004 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File Treasurer's Report for July 31, 2004. BACKGROUND: Total Cash and City Investments increased 2.87% during the month. This includes cash, cash in bank and cash with trustee. At July 31, 2004, $559,435 remains from the original $1.3 Million Loan from RCTC in 1998. Some of the large expenditures during the month included items such as $304,528 to Genesis Construction for 6th & Mistletoe water line, $231,158 to Riverside County Fire Department for Fire Contract, $128,547 to Perma for Insurance Deposit Premiums, $122,317 to Tri-Lakes Consultants for professional services, $115,848 to Beylik Drilling for Lake Park well, $86,472 to CR&R for trash services, $80,685 to Matich Corporation for various paving projects, $80,417 to Best, Best & Krieger for Legal Fees, $73,283 to Genesis Construction for De Anza Lift Station And Water Main Project and $48,992 to Southern California Edison for electric service. The Treasurers' report is a "snapshot" report of our cash position on the last day of the month in all of our accounts. Page 1 of 1 Page 1 INVESTMENT TYPE INSTITUTION SERIAL # CITY OF SAN JACINTO TREASURERS REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDING JULY 31, 2004 INTEREST PURCHASE MATURITY RATE YIELD DATE DATE 06/30/04 PREY. MONTH BALANCE 07/31 /04 CURRENT BALANCE % change from prior month 07/31/04 COMPUTED MARKET ACCRUED VALUE INTEREST STATE POOL Money Market DEMAND Account PAYROLL Account IMPREST Account LA I. F. Bank of Hemet Bank of Hemet Bank of Hemet Bank of Hemet Cash on Hand 1.604% 1.240% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 1.604% Various Open 1.240% 11/01/01 Open 0.00 Various Open 0.00 Various Open 0.00 Various Open 0.00 Various nla TOTAL CITY INVESTMENTS & FUNDS RESTRICTED CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT (BOND FUNDS) CFD NO 2 Mutual Fund Mutual Fund Mutual Fund Corporate Obligations Mutual Fund Mutual Fund Mutual Fund Mutual Fund Mutual Fund Trustee Union Bnk Union Bnk Union Bnk Union Bnk Union Bnk Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Bayerische Lankbk GIC Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund TOTAL CFD NO 2 1993 RDA SAN JACINTO TAX ALLOCATION BONDS Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 94-1 Money Market Union Bnk Alamo Capital Cash Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 94-1 1997 WATER IMPROVEMENT REVENUE BONDS Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund TOTAL 1997 WATER IMPROV. 6711695201 6711695202 6711695204 6711695204 6711695205 6711695206 6711695208 6711695301 6711695501 Various Various Various 10/10/02 Various Various Various Various Various Open Open Open 09/01/14 Open Open Open Open Open 7-15639 1.110% 1.110% Various Open 678544857 0.400% 0.400% Various Open 7-15777 1.110% 1.110% Various Open 7-15980 1.110% 1.110% Various Open 7-15980-06 1.110% 1.110% Various Open 2002 WATER REVENUE BONDS Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Pray. T-Fund 6-711682901 Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund 6-711682902 Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund 6-711682903 TOTAL 2002 WATER REVENUE BONDS 1999 RDA SOBOBA TAX ALLOCATION BONDS Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund 1.110% 1.110% 1.110% 1.110% 1.110% 1.110% Various Various Various Open Open Open 7-16274 1.110% 1.110% Various Open $18,316,423 $1,785,948 $1,096,099 $5,859 $1,365 $600 $18,875,297 $2,087,778 $990,662 $11,316 $1,365 $600 3.05% 16.90% -9.62% 93.14% 0.00% 0.00% $18,900,467 $2,087,778 $990,662 $11,316 $1,365 $600 $25,170 n/a nla n/a n/a n/a $21,206,294 $21,967,018 3.59% $454,281 $0 $15,026 $748,800 $40,108 $829,971 $110,016 $288,881 $26,115 $2,513,198 $333,812 $454,392 $o $15,033 $748,800 $40,127 $830,370 $110,042 $289,019 $26,128 $2,513,911 0.02% 0.00% 0.05% 0.00% 0.05% 0.05% 0.02% 0.05% 0.05% 0.03% $333,972 0.05% $21,992,198 S25,170 $454,392 SO $15,033 $748,800 $40,127 $830,370 $110,042 $289,019 $26,128 $2,513,911 $333,972 n/a nla n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a nla n/a n/a n/a $30,247 $22,260 -26.41 % $0 $0 0.00% $30,247 $22,260 -26.41 % $22,260 $0 $22,260 n/a n/a n/a $1,355,479 $204,845 $1,560,324 $75 $0 $0 $75 $1,356,129 0.05% $204,943 0.05% $1,561,072 0.05% $75 $0 $0 $75 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% $1,356,129 $204,943 $1,561,072 $75 $0 $0 $75 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $88,286 $88,329 0.05% $88,329 n/a Prepared By: Jack Templeton, CA - 08/23/04 Page 2 CITY OF SAN JACINTO TREASURERS REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDING JULY 31, 2004 06/30/04 07/31/04 % change 07/31/04 COMPUTED INVESTMENT INSTITUTION INTEREST PURCHASE MATURITY PREV. MONTH CURRENT from prior MARKET ACCRUED TYPE SERIAL # RATE YIELD DATE DATE BALANCE BALANCE month VALUE INTEREST ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 87-1 Cash BNY Bank of New York 411795 0.000% 0.000% Various Open $666 $666 0.00% $666 n/a RCTC LOAN Money Market USB US Bank 95-444672 0.460% 0.460% Various Open $559,218 $559,435 0.04% $559,435 n/a TOTAL CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT TOTAL ALL FUNDS I CERTIFY THAT THESE INVESTMENTS COMPLY WITH ALL STATE LAWS PERTAINING TO THE INVESTMENT OF LOCAL AGENCY FUNDS AND THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO'S INVESTMENT POLICIES CITY OF SAN JACINTO MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SIX MONTH CASH FLOW REQUIREMENTS AS PER GOVERNMENT CODE 53846Ib)(3). w MES W. POTTS, TREASURER City Of San Jacinto $5,085,826 $5,079,720 -0.12% $5,079,720 n/a $26,292,120 527,046,738 2.87% $27,071,908 $25,170 Prepared By: Jack Templeton, CA - 08/23/04 AGENDA ITEM 5. LI September 16, 2004 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Steven G. Pasarow, Redevelopment Operations Manager SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Schedule of Events and Objectives and Policies for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 RECOMMENDATION: By motion approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Schedule of Events and Objectives and Policies for Fiscal Year 2005-2006. BACKGROUND: The City of San Jacinto receives an annual allocation of Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds through the Riverside County Economic Development Agency. For Fiscal Year 2004/2005, the City received $222,090. The City's upcoming allotment is yet to be determined. CDBG funds may be used public service activities, construction of infrastructure improvements, and programs such as housing, economic development, and code enforcement. The CDBG Program brings Federal dollars to local communities for the purpose of assisting low- and moderate income residents through public services, infrastructure improvements, economic development projects, and the elimination of blight. Funds are allocated based on population and the number of low- and moderate income households in each city. To be eligible for CDBG funding a program or project must meet one of three following national objectives: • Activities benefiting low and moderate income persons/households. • Activities which aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. • Activities designed to meet community development needs having a particular urgency. Programs and/or projects must also meet the eligibility requirements of the CDBG program. A maximum of 15% may be used on public service activities and 85%for projects and non- public service programs. Page 1 of 15 The following programs/projects were awarded funding in FY2004/2005: • Valley -Wide Recreation $ 5,000 • Police Activities League $10,090 • Senior Home Repair Program $10,000 • City of San Jacinto, Neighborhood Clean Up $ 1,000 • San Jacinto Museum Relocation to Estudillo Mansion Project $50,000 • City of San Jacinto, Code Enforcement $146,030 Total: $222,090 To guide the program/project selection, an application booklet has been prepared and will be available to potential applicants. The booklet includes an overview of the CDBG Program, Objectives and Policies, a Schedule of Events, and Application. Objectives and Policies are new elements proposed for FY 2005/06. They identify the various categories of activities (objectives) that could be funded and how to prioritize programs and projects (policies). The City of San Jacinto has established the following Community Development Objectives and Policies in order to give maximum feasible priority to activities which will benefit low and moderate income residents. OBJECTIVES 1. Fair Housing Activities The promotion of housing choice and support of state and federal fair housing laws to ensure that all residents have access to a decent home in a suitable living environment in the City. Fair Housing services are funded through the Riverside County Economic Development Agency. 2. Capital Improvement Activities Acquisition, design, construction, and installation of needed public facilities and improvements located in CDBG income eligible target areas. Public facilities and improvements may include sidewalks, street improvements, storm drains, and water and sewer lines. 3. Health, Safety, and Public Welfare Eliminating conditions which are detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare through interim rehabilitation, code enforcement, etc. 4. Housing and Neighborhood Improvement Activities Improve the City's housing stock through rehabilitation of substandard units occupied by low and moderate income persons. Identify substandard and deteriorated housing stock that does not meet building, safety, or fire code requirements. 5. Public Service Activities Improving the quality and quantity of public services, principally for low and moderate income persons. 6. Historic Preservation Restoring and preserving properties formally designated as historic resources. POLICIES Policy 1 City projects, which benefit the City, will be given priority. Public improvements, such as sidewalks, streets, curb, and gutter can provide long term benefits to improve low and moderate income CDBG target areas. Other City sponsored programs, such as housing programs, code enforcement activities, and neighborhood clean-up also assist in the improvement of the community. Policy 2 Local service providers within the City of San Jacinto will be given funding priority when they are providing equivalent or the same services as those outside the City. Track record, experience, and years of operation may also be considered. Policy 3 Programs and projects, which have other funding sources, in addition to funds requested through the CDBG program, will be considered. It is important for projects/programs to sustain themselves should CDBG funding not be available in the future. Applications will be available on October 01, 2004 and due on November 01, 2004. Several public hearings will be scheduled to provide the public an opportunity to comment on the types of programs and projects to be considered and those proposed for selection. The Schedule of Events, in the application booklet, outlines when the meetings will be conducted. BUDGETARY IMPACT: The CDBG Program funding is received from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and awarded through the County of Riverside to the City of San Jacinto for the purposes of funding programs and projects that benefit low and moderate income persons. The City will need to provide funding for staff to administer the program. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A Application CITY OF SAN JACINTO FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION FORM This application form must be completed by all agencies or entities applying for Community Development Block Grant Funds from the City of San Jacinto. ALL QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED, AND REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION ATTACHED. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED FOR REVIEW. If additional space is required to complete the response, continue the answer on additional attached sheets, in sequence, and numbering the response. The City of San Jacinto estimates that it will receive $230,000 for the CDBG Program Year 2005-2006. Of that amount, 15% or approximately $34,500 will be available for Public Service activities, the balance of funds, approximately $195,500 will be available for Public Facilities projects. Funds will be made available for use after July 1, 2005. Should you require any assistance in completing the application, contact the City's representative at (951) 487-7320. You are encouraged to submit your application well before the deadline to allow ample time for review, completeness and accuracy. QUALIFYING CRITERIA In order to qualify for funding eligible projects must meet one of the following criteria: 1. The activity predominantly benefits low and moderate -income persons (more than 51% of persons participating in your project or activity will be benefiting). 2. The activity will eliminate slums or blight. 3. The project will meet a need having a particular urgency. (The condition of urgency must be of recent origin, generally being developed or critical less than 18 months preceding the application for assistance.) TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FUNDING, YOU MUST SUBMIT AN ORIGINAL SIGNED APPLICATION WITH ATTACHMENTS AND TWO COPIES WITH ATTACHMENTS, FOR A TOTAL OF THREE, TO THE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOT LATER THAN 4:00 P.M. NOVEMBER 01, 2003. City of San Jacinto Community Development Department Attn: Redevelopment Operations Manager 248 East Main Street, San Jacinto, CA 92583 The City of San Jacinto will hold Public Hearings on November 18, 2004 and December 02, 2004 to determine which projects and activities shall receive funding for the 2005-2006 CDBG Program Year. All projects, programs and activities approved on those dates will be forwarded to the County of Riverside for review and approval. The County of Riverside has been designated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as an Urban County. Each year the County or Riverside applies for federal Community Development Block Grant funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development as an Urban County to meet the housing, economic and community development needs of the county and its cooperating cities. These funds are distributed to the unincorporated Supervisorial district communities and the cooperating cities based on a formula which calculates population, poverty and substandard housing needs. This application form is to be used by potential sponsors who are submitting application requests which will primarily benefit residents of the incorporated City of San Jacinto. If your proposed activity provides a primary benefit to any of the following cooperating cities, you should contact that city for application requirements and make a direct application to that city: COOPERATING CITIES CITY CONTACT PHONE NO. Banning Paul Toor (951) 922-3130 Public Works Director Beaumont Dave Dillon (951) 769-8520 EDA Director Blythe Robert Casais (760) 922-6130 Development Services Director Calimesa Shaina Haywood (951) 795-9801 Finance Director Canyon Lake Delbert "Del" Powers (951) 244-2955 City Manager Cathedral City Tony Barton, Park & Rec. Manager (760) 770-0380 Parks & Recreation Desert Hot Springs Author Davis (760) 329-6411 Planning Tech x224 Indio Gary Werner Dir. Dev. Services (760) 342-6541 Lake Elsinore Dave Sapp (951) 673-3124 Community Services Director La Quinta Jerry Herman (760) 777-7000 Community Development Director Murrieta Jim Miller (951) 698-1040 Community Development Director x6077 San Jacinto Deborah De Grado (951) 582-5540 Public Information Officer Palm Desert Luis Espinoza (760) 346-0611 Finance Oper. Manager Perris Michael Morales (951) 943-5003 Planning & Community Development San Jacinto Steven G. Pasarow (951) 487-7330 Temecula Redevelopment Operations Manager Gus Papgolos Senior Management Analyst (951) 694-6430 This application shall be utilized for City of San Jacinto's CDBG Program funding requests only. For more information on the County of Riverside's CDBG Program for unincorporated communities please contact: Economic Development Agency County of Riverside P.O. Box 1180 3525 14th Street Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 955-8916 PROPOSAL No. Date Rec'd CITY OF SAN JACINTO 2005-2006 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION FORM I. GENERAL INFORMATION: Name of Primary Activity Sponsor: Mailing Address: Zip Code: Telephone Number: ( ) Contact Person: Title: Address (If different from above): Amount of CDBG Funds Requested: $ Where will the activity occur and what is the geographic scale of the proposed activity (community, city, region), be specific? In which Supervisorial District does your activity occur? II. ORGANIZATIONAL HISTORY: (This is applicable only if you are a non-profit organization). Please provide a list of your current Board of Directors (Label as Attachment II). Date Organization founded: Date Organization incorporated as a non-profit organization: Number of volunteers: Number of paid staff: Federal identification number: State identification number: Attach: Tax Exempt Status Documentation Attach: ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BY-LAWS (Label as Attachment IIA) III. PROJECT ACTIVITY: (check the applicable category your application represents) Real Property Acquisition _ Public Service _ Housing _ Capital Equipment (Fixed) Rehabilitation/Preservation (please provide picture of structure) _ Public Facilities Improvements (construction) Other: Please Describe Activity: Use additional sheets if necessary IV. PROJECT NARRATIVE: A. Name of Project: Specific Location: 1. Provide a detailed description of the proposed project or activity by describing in quantifiable terms precisely what will be accomplished with the requested funds (attach additional sheets if necessary) 2. What are the goals and objectives of the project or activity? (attach additional sheets if necessary) 3. Discuss this project's or activity's benefit to the low and moderate income population to be served by this project or activity: 4. If this is a public service activity: (A) Is this a NEW service provided by your agency? Yes_ No (B) If this service is not new, will the proposed activity substantially increase the existing level of service? Yes No Explain how the service will be substantially increased. (attach additional sheets if necessary) 5. What methods will be used for community involvement to assure that all who might benefit from the project are provided an opportunity to participate? 6. What are this project's or activity's expected results? 7. How many persons are expected to be served? 8. How will you measure and evaluate how the project or activity meets its goals and objectives? [measures should be both qualitative and quantitative] 9. What evidence is there of long-term commitment to the proposal? Describe how you plan to continue the work (project or activity) after the grant ends? 10. Attach maps of proposed project(s) location(s) and service area(s). V. PROJECT BENEFIT: To be eligible for CDBG funding, a project or activity must qualify within one of the three following categories. Indicate how the project or activity in this application meets one of the following categories of benefits. Indicate the source of the information provided. (Provide information for the one category your application applies to.) CATEGORY 1. Benefit to low -moderate income persons (must be documented). Please identify how you have documented the persons served are low -moderate income persons by providing information in either A, B, or C. A. Area Benefit: The project serves persons in the identified block groups in Census Tract which are 51% or more low/moderate income. Check One: 1990 Census Data; 2000 Census Data: Census Tract and block group numbers: CT BG CT BG CT BG CT BG CT BG CT BG # Total population in Census Tract(s) / block group(s) # Total low -moderate population in Census Tract(s) / block group(s) B. Limited Clientele: The project serves clientele that have documented their income. Identify the procedure you currently have in place to document that the clientele you serve are low -moderate income persons. C. Clientele presumed to be principally low- and moderate -income persons. The following groups are presumed by HUD to meet this criterion: Abused children, battered spouses, elderly persons, severely disabled adults, homeless persons, illiterate adults, person's living with AIDS, and migrant farm workers. Describe your clientele to be served by the activity. CATEGORY 2. Prevention or Elimination of Slums and Blight: Is the project located in a Redevelopment Area? Yes No. If yes, attach map of area. Additionally, provide the Redevelopment Project Area Report (excerpts accepted) which documents the existence of slum/blight. Also document the specific redevelopment objectives pertaining to the proposed project. CATEGORY 3. Documented Health or Safety Condition of Particular Urgency: Condition shall have been of recent (18 months) origin. Provide documentation which demonstrates the health or safety condition has existed only within the previous 18 months. VI. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: A. Complete the following annual budget to begin on July I of this year. If these line items are not applicable to your activity or project, please attach an appropriate budget. Provide total Budget information and distribution of CDBG funds in the proposed budget. TOTAL BUDGET CDBG FUNDS BUDGET SUMMARY Include CDBG Funds) REQUESTED I. Personnel A. Salaries & Wages $ $ B. Fringe Benefits $ $ C. Consultants & Contract $ $ Services $ $ SUB -TOTAL $ $ II. Non -Personnel A. Space Costs $ $ B. Rental, Lease or Purchase of Equipment $ $ C. Consumable Supplies $ $ D. Travel $ $ E. Telephone $ $ F. Other Costs $ $ SUB -TOTAL $ $ III. Architectural/Engineering Design $ $ IV. Acquisition of Real Property $ $ V. Construction/Rehabilitation $ $ TOTAL: $ $ B. Identify other funding sources; identify commitments or applications for funds from other sources to implement this project or activity. Attach evidence of commitment. Funding Source Amount Requested Date Available Type of Commitment C. Provide a summary by line item of your Agency's previous years' income and expense statement. (Use additional sheets if necessary) D. If this project benefits citizens of more than one community or local jurisdictions and/or municipalities, have requests been made to those other jurisdictions? Yes _ No If yes, identify sources and indicate outcome In no, please explain E. Was this project previously funded with CDBG funds? If yes, when? Is this activity a continuation of a previously funded (CDBG) project? (explain) VII. MANAGEMENT INFORMATION: (PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION BY ATTACHMENT). A. Describe the organization responsible for managing and operating the project including: previous similar experience, list source, and commitment of funds for operation and maintenance. Identify project manager, or person in charge of the project's day-to-day operations. B. What is the role of your organization in the community? C. Timetable for Project Implementation. Indicate primary project objectives: (You may attach a time chart, if you wish). OBJECTIVE OR MILESTONE START DATE COMPLETION DATE D. If you have never received CDBG funding from Riverside County or its participating cities, provide the following regarding any previous experience with other federally funded programs. Source Activity Year Funds Received Amt. VIII. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: Every project proposal MUST contain evidence of citizen participation and support for the proposal. That evidence must include documentation of at least one community meeting this year at which the specific project was discussed and opportunity given for citizen input. Describe the methods used to obtain citizen involvement and attach appropriate documentation. IX. PLANNING: Identify the most applicable adopted plans or strategies (if any) which the proposed project will help implement: APPLICATION CERTIFICATION Undersigned hereby certifies that: 1. The information contained in the project application is complete and accurate. 2. The applicant shall comply with all Federal and County policies and requirements affecting the CDBG program. 3. The federal assistance made available through the CDBG program funding is not being utilized to substantially reduce the prior levels of local financial support for community development activities. 4. The applicant shall maintain and operate the facility for its approved use throughout its economic life. 5. Sufficient funds are available to complete the project as described, if CDBG funds are approved. 6. I have obtained authorization to submit this application for CDBG funding. (DOCUMENTATION ATTACHED). Type Name of Authorized Representative: Signature of Authorized Representative: Date: The following are attached to this application: Yes No 1) Map of area served 2) Management Information 3) Organizational history (Non -Profits only) 3a Articles of Incorporation/Proof of Non -Profit Status (e.g. I.R.S. 501C3 letter) 3b Current Board of Directors 4) Income and Expense Statement CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM SCHEDULE OF EVENTS FY 2005-2006 City Council Approves Application Package Sept. 16, 2004 Applications Available to the Public Oct. 01, 2004 Completed Applications Due to City of San Jacinto Nov. 01, 2004 (11:00 A. M.) Staff/Committee Review of Submitted Applications Nov. 02-05, 2004 First Public Hearing Nov. 18, 2004 Second Public Hearing Dec. 02, 2004 City Submits Approved Applications to County of Riverside Dec. 10, 2004 County of Riverside Board of Supervisors Review Mar. 2005 (estimate) County of Riverside Approves Applications May 2005 (estimate) FY 2005-2006 Program Year Begins July 01, 2005 AGENDA ITEM 5.5 September 16, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Mitch Alm, Chief of Police Cad SUBJECT: Approval of Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) Grant Spending Plan (FY 2004-05) RECOMMENDATION: By motion: 1) Approve and authorize the proposed Spending Plan for the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) Grant for FY 2004-05. 2) Appropriate $102,535 of expenditures in AB3229 COPS Fund (064) and add $100,000 in Budgeted Revenues for SLESF Grant in Fund (064) for FY 2004-05. BACKGROUND: The Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Grant funding is received from the State of California's Citizen's Option for Public Safety Programs via the County of Riverside. The program began in 1997 and continues to be funded. The use of the SLESF grant funds is only for front-line municipal police services and should supplement, not supplant current front-line law enforcement services. The Spending Plan is approved by a Supplemental Law Enforcement Oversight Committee that is chaired by the Sheriff of Riverside County. Once the plan has been approved and submitted, the funding should occur in later December 2004. The City of San Jacinto is entitled to receive a grant award in the amount of $100,000. These monies, together with a fund balance brought forward from FY 2003-04 in the amount of $2,535, will be utilized for frontline municipal police services, specifically in the following areas: 1. Station security (fencing, parking lot gates, arrestee holding areas). 2. Patrol workstations (briefing room, patrol supervisor). 3. Traffic Unit radar (equipment for four vehicles). 4. Patrol bicycles (two mountain bicycles fully -equipped). A ppr Ara Of. City Manager: Finance Director: Page 1 of 2 5. Three city -owned (Plain) Patrol units (redesigned and fully -equipped for specialized assignments). 6. Lap -tops and audiovisual (power point projector). No funds were budgeted for FY 2004-05 because it was unclear if the State was going to fund SLESF at the time the City budget was prepared. JUSTIFICATION: The Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund allows for expenditures to cover salaries, benefits, services, equipment or administrative overhead. BUDGETARY IMPACT: There are no anticipated general fund costs. This is a standalone grant and no matching funds are required. ATTACHMENTS: SLESF — Report for FY 2003-04 SLESF — Proposed Spending Plan for FY 2004-05 Page 2 of 2 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Form For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 County of Riverside City City of San Jacinto Categories Amount Beginning Fund Balance Prior Year Adjustment Prior Year Encumbrance Reversals Restated Beginning Fund Balance REVENUES State Funding Interest Revenue Other Revenue Total Revenues EXPENDITURES Salaries and Benefits Services and Supplies Equipment Administrative Overhead Total Expenditures ENCUMBRANCES Current Year Services and Supplies Equipment Total Encumbrances, Current Year 23,895 23,895 100,000 830 100,830 93,699 15,122 12,761 608 122,190 Net Change in Fund Balance (21,360) Ending Fund Balance 2,535 STATISTICAL DATA Positions Sworn Officers Correctional Officers Prosecutors Investigators Support Staff ' 0.97 Total Positions 0.97 The Chief Financial Officer hereby certifies that the "State Funding" amount equals the payment issued by the ivelside County Auditor -Controller Chief Financial Officer (Signature) Bernard Simon 9/ /y Date 951-654-7337 Typed Name of Chief Financial Officer Telephone Number CA Controllers Information 2001reporting.902 13 September 2002 San Jacinto Police Department roweioanow San Jacinto DATE: September 8, 2004 TO: Bernie Simon, Finance Director FROM: Mitch Alm, Chief of Police RE: SLESF Grant Funds — Revised Spending Plan The following is the recommended Spending Plan for the FY 2004 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund: 1. Station Security Area. a. Security fencing and gates around parking lots. b. Automatic gate mechanism. c. Arrestee holding cell modifications. Estimated expenditures: $25,000. 2. Patrol Workstations/Office Areas: a. Workstations for briefing/report writing room. b. Workstation for patrol supervisor/sergeant. Estimated expenditures: $25,000. 3. Traffic Unit Radar Installations and equipment: a. Equip two patrol black and white vehicles with radar devices. b. Equip two motorcycles with radar devices. c. Purchase four Pass -devices (DUI detector units). Estimated expenditures: $15,000. 4. Patrol Bicycles: a. Purchase and equip two police mountain bicycles for specialized patrol programs. b. Estimated expenditures: $3,000. 160 W. Sixth Street San Jacinto, California 92583 San Jacinto Police Department 5. Citizen -On -Patrol (COP) Vehicles: a. Service, re -paint, re -decal three COP vehicles for program. b. Maintenance estimated for one year is $5,000. Estimated expenditures: $9,535. 6. Computer and Audiovisual Equipment: a. Lap top computers for patrol. b. PowerPoint projectors for community meetings. c. CPU and monitor upgrades for patrol briefing/report writing areas. Estimated expenditures: $24,475.00 7. City Administrative Overhead $525.00 Total expenditures = $102,535. 160 W. Sixth Street San Jacinto, California 92583 AGENDA ITEM 6-to September 16, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Mitch Alm, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Proposed Expenditure to Establish a Volunteer Mounted Posse Unit for the San Jacinto Police Department RECOMMENDATION: By motion appropriate and authorize the expenditure of $3,055.44 from the general fund reserve for the one-time purchase of equipment required to establish a twenty -member San Jacinto Police Department Mounted Posse Unit. BACKGROUND: The San Jacinto Police Department recommends the establishment of a Volunteer Mounted Posse Unit to augment police services within the City of San Jacinto. This unit would be deployed for community events (fairs, parades, etc.), high visibility patrols (retail centers, holiday patrols, etc.), and other related law enforcement programs. A one-time cost of $3,055.44 is required to initially equip the unit. Costs are related to a City of San Jacinto Mounted Posse Unit flag and horse blankets, which will be displayed on all activities. The Sheriffs Department will cover all the costs related to training, management and maintenance of this unit. JUSTIFICATION: The San Jacinto Police Department recommends the expenditures. The San Jacinto Mounted Posse Unit will augment police services and provide many volunteer hours to the city in the future. Page 1 of 2 BUDGETARY IMPACT: The fiscal impact will be $3,055.44 from the general fund reserve. ATTACHMENTS: None Page 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM 5 September 16, 2004 TO: FROM: Mitch Alm, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Proposed Acceptance of the Revised Memorandum of Understanding with the San Jacinto Unified School District The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council RECOMMENDATION: By motion approve the revision of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the San Jacinto Unified School District, the City of San Jacinto and the San Jacinto Police Department. BACKGROUND: The San Jacinto Unified School District, the City of San Jacinto, and the San Jacinto Police Department have met, authored, agreed and signed the original MOU dated on April 5, 2001. As of June 1, 2004, the City of San Jacinto began contracting with the Riverside County Sheriffs Department for law enforcement services. Due to this change in services, and some minor changes in roles and responsibilities of the School Resource Officers. It was necessary to modify the original MOU. JUSTIFICATION: The San Jacinto Police Department recommends the adoption of the revised MOU between the City of San Jacinto and the San Jacinto Unified School District. BUDGETARY IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact. Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Copy of original Memorandum of Understanding with the San Jacinto Unified School District, dated April 1, 2001. 2. Copy of revised Memorandum of Understanding with the San Jacinto Unified School District. Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SAN JACINTO AND SAN JACINTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AN AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE PLACEMENT OF A SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER AND A DARE OFFICER WITHIN THE SAN JACINTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Whereas, the San Jacinto Unified School District, hereinafter referred to as District, desires to cooperate with the City of San Jacinto, hereinafter called City, and to establish an agreement with the City in order to insure the greater safety of students, staff, and the public at the campuses of the District, and to improve and strengthen law enforcement on or about the District's campuses. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: 1. The City shall provide to the District, during the days school is in session, one trained police officer, on a full-time basis, with the equipment normally provided for his/her use by the Police Department of the City, for assignment to the School District, for the purpose of acting in the role of a School Resource Officer, at the District's various campuses and other sites, thereby improving and strengthening law enforcement presence and inculcating in the students, faculty, and staff an affection, respect, and understanding of the role of law enforcement in society. 2. The police officer shall work in cooperation with the respective site Principals for the purpose of enforcing school regulations, California State statutes containing penal and regulatory sections, and protecting school property and persons thereon. The police officer shall dedicate his/her time and efforts to issues and incidents involving the District's property, students, faculty, and staff, wherever they may be located. The police officer's work hours shall generally coincide with school operation hours. When or where a crime occurs, the police officer shall take appropriate legal measures in reference thereto, without interference from any District official, faculty, staff, student, parent, or other person claiming to have an interest therein. The police officer shall work in cooperation with the District's Superintendent, site Principals, faculty, and staff to establish programs, duties, responsibilities, and priorities. The police officer shall act under the control and supervision of the City's Chief of Police, or his designate. 3. The police officer shall remain in contact, either by radio, pager, telephone, or cellular telephone with the District or school site officials. If the police officer is unable to respond to a school emergency, the District or school site shall contact the Police Department, through the 9-1-1 emergency system and a regular police unit or units will respond to the emergency, pending the arrival of the assigned school police officer. SCHOOL RESOURCE AND DARE OFFICER AGREEMENT PAGE 2 OF 3 The District shall pay to the City, for all services rendered by the School Resources Officer under this agreement, a fee per month determined by the salary and benefits of the officer placed in the position. For the initial twelve months of the agreement, with payments to be made upon billing by the City, the initial monthly fee is estimated to be $5,546.00 per month, which is based on the salary and employee benefits for an officer placed at Step 5 of the San Jacinto police officer's salary schedule. The actual fee will be determined based on the salary of the selected officer. However, it will not exceed the Step 5 salary. The fee shall be periodically adjusted to coincide with the pay scale for San Jacinto police officers or the salary of the officer placed in the position. For each year of the agreement, the City and District will work cooperatively to procure grant dollars, which can fund all or at least partially fund the position. If sufficient grant dollars cannot be obtained, the District agrees to fully fund the position for the initial 3-year term of the agreement. Subsequent year funding will be determined on a year-to-year basis by the City and District. The police officer, under this agreement, shall be entitled to his/her regular sick time, as offered by the City. If the officer is sick or injured, no replacement officer will be provided. The police officer shall be entitled to his/her regular vacation, holiday, and other compensatory time, as offered by the City. Where possible, such time -off shall coincide with school closures and holidays, with no replacement requirement. Officer training, related to the function as a School Resource Officer, shall occur during school days and hours, with no replacement requirement. Potential School Resource Officer training will be coordinated with the District as to schedule and cost. Typically, the cost of such training shall be borne by the District, with any training reimbursements received by the City as a credit. 5. The City shall provide an additional police officer as a DARE Officer, to teach the proscribed DARE curriculum to the District's 4th, 5th, and 6h grade students. All costs of officer training shall be born by the City. All DARE related activities, such as Red Ribbon assemblies and course completion ceremonies, shall be conducted at the expense of the City. 6. Should the District sponsor or hold any activity, beyond normal school hours, which requires security, such as school dances, sporting events, etc., the District shall contract for security personnel, with the Police Department or other private security organization, as a separate measure, beyond this agreement. Any costs for such event security is not included within the services described in this Agreement. During the term of this Agreement, the District shall indemnify, hold the City, its officers and employees harmless, and defend the City from any and all claims, demands or liability arising from alleged acts or omissions by the District and its officers, agents or employees during those times when said officers or agents are acting under the terms of this Agreement. The City shall indemnify, hold the District, its officers and employees harmless, and defend the District from any and SCHOOL RESOURCE AND DARE OFFICER AGREEMENT PAGE 3 OF 3 all claims, demands or liability arising from alleged acts or omissions by the City, its officers, agents or employees during when such officers or agents are acting under the terms of this Agreement. 8. This Agreement may be amended at any time by the mutual consent of the parties hereto and may be terminated by either upon 60 day written notice to the other of its intention to do so. In the event this Agreement is terminated, the cost shall be prorated on the basis of one -tenth per month of the actual services performed hereunder. 9. The term of this Agreement shall be three [3] years. The Agreement may be extended for up to an additional three [3] years, at one year increments, by mutual consent of the San Jacinto Police Chief and the District Superintendent. Prior to the extension hereof, the San Jacinto Police Chief shall determine what adjustments shall be made to the compensation set forth in Section 4in order for the City to recover its costs and shall so inform the District Superintendent. If agreeable to both parties, then the agreement may be extended as provided herein. 10. The District will supply office space, furniture, telephone, facsimile, office supplies, and other assistance necessary to the officers to perform their duties under this Agreement. IN WITNESS HERETO, the parties have executed and entered into this Agreement on April 5 ,2001. ATTEST: By .Cina oYIA,tLf By San Jacio City Clerk San Jacinto Unified School District Superintendent,SJUSD City of San Jacinto, Police Department City of San Jacinto a Municipal Corporatio By By Approved as to Form and Content By »' A • -T.- City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 2282 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE SAN JACINTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONCERNING THE PLACEMENT OF A SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER AND A DARE OFFICER WITHIN THE SAN JACINTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. Whereas, the City of San Jacinto and the San Jacinto Unified School District desire to cooperatively work together to improve and strengthen law enforcement on or about the School District's campuses; Whereas, the placement of a School Resource Officer and a DARE Officer will insure the greater safety of students, staff, and the public at the School District campuses; Whereas, an agreement concerning the placement of a School Resource Officer and a Dare Officer within the San Jacinto Unified School District has been developed; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, AS FOLLOWS, Section 1. An Agreement Concerning the Placement of a School Resource Officer and a Dare Officer within the San Jacinto Unified School District, attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution, is hereby approved; Section 2. The City Manager is authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City of San Jacinto. Adopted this 5 th day of April, 2001. Ayes: Ayres, Carlson-Buydos, Conner, Good, Williams Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: None Attest: Susan Matthew, CMC, City Clerk pA—uotAk 0 Patrick A. Williams, Mayor AMENDMENT NO. 1 CITY OF SAN JACINTO And SAN JACINTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AN AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE PLACEMENT OF A SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER AND A DARE OFFICER WITHIN THE SAN JACINTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 1. Paragraph 4 — is replaced with the following: "The District will pay for the services of one School Resource Officer. The School Resource Officer will be paid as based on the contract agreement between the Riverside County Sheriff's Department and the City of San Jacinto." 2. Paragraph 5 — is replaced with the following: "The City of San Jacinto shall provide a second School Resource Officer, formerly referred to as the Dare Officer, to be responsible for and respond to North Mountain and Monte Vista Middle Schools. Examples of the responsibilities of the SRO will be to provide instruction in drug awareness, "Stranger Danger", bicycle safety, inhalant abuse, Red Ribbon related programs and other related topics. Other duties may include serving on the Youth Accountability Team (YAT), SARB representation, and the SAVE Deputy Program. All costs of officer training shall be borne by the City. 3. Paragraph 9 — is amended as follows: "The original agreement dated April 5, 2001, is hereby extended for the 2004-2005 School Year by the mutual agreement of the City of San Jacinto and the San Jacinto Unified School District." IN WITNESS HERETO, the parties have executed this Amendment to the Agreement thereby indicating they have read and understood the same, indicate their full and complete consent to its terms, and executed this Amendment on July 1, 2004. CITY OF SAN JACINTO SAN JACINTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT By By Dorothy Chouinard City Clerk Joseph R. Busek Assistant Superintendent, Business/Facilities CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION POLICE DEPARTMENT By By Peter Cosentini Mitch Alm City Manager Police Chief Approved as to Form and Content By City Attorney U:1WKading1Contract\Amend#1 CtySJ-Res-DARE AGENDA ITEM 5. 0 September 16, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Ed Starner, Interim Public Works Superintendent SUBJECT: Complete Installation of Street Name Signs RECOMMENDATION: By motion, approve and authorize staff to hire two (2) full-time temporary employees for a six (6) month period to assist the Streets Division personnel with completing the installation of new street name signs in the City of San Jacinto. It is also recommended that the City Council appropriate $26,400 from the General Fund Reserve for this purpose. BACKGROUND: The City Council previously authorized and approved staff to order and install new street name signs throughout the City of San Jacinto. There are 230-sets of new street name signs remaining to be installed. Staff believes that the earliest the project could be completed without the extra help is July 2005. JUSTIFICATION: Completing this project will enhance and give consistency to street identification throughout the City. With this expenditure, the program can be implemented in six months. BUDGETARY IMPACT: The cost estimate for two -temporary employees from an employment agency for six months will be approximately $26,400. ATTACHMENTS: None Appro City Manager: Finance Director: Page 1 of 1 AGENDA ITEM 5.9 September 16, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City ouncil FROM: Tim Hults, Community Development Director \ 14 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit 8-04 — Wireless Telecommunication Facility Location: Eastern end of Park Hill, approximately 1500 feet west of Park Avenue Applicant: Tarn Taylor Cingular Wireless 3345 Michelson Drive, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92612 RECOMMENDATION: Ratify the Approval of Conditional Use Permit 8-04, based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval, to allow the installation of a wireless telecommunication facility, consisting of a 32 foot high mono -palm with an antenna array mounted in the palm ball of the mono -palm, along with a painted microwave dish, supported by a 12'x20'x10' equipment shelter on an 879 square foot pad. The project is located adjacent to an operational 30 foot high Sprint wireless facility mounted to an existing 24 foot high water tank. The sites are located on the eastern end of Park Hill, 1500 feet west of Park Avenue BACKGROUND: On August 26, 2004 the Planning Commission approved a proposal by Velocitel for the benefit of Cingular Wireless to construct on an 879 square foot leased a unmanned wireless telecommunication facility. The facility consists of a 32 foot high stealthed mono -palm each with a three panel array located on the palm ball. Also proposed, is a 12'x20'x10' equipment shelter. The Planning Commission adopted a resolution approving a truly stealthed, facility with no visible antenna arrays. The Commission also approved a condition requiring the installation of a 20-foot high and one 30-foot high live palm tree, as well as a block wall with screened gates, surrounding the facility. JUSTIFICATION: A Wireless Telecommunication Facility in the form of a stealthed mono -palm can be approved in a residential zone as long as the lot is not developed with a residential unit. BUDGETARY IMPACT: None anticipated ATTACHMENTS: 1— Site Plan Package 1— Facility Access Route 1— CEQA Document 1— Current Zoning Map 1— Planning Commission Conditions of Approval 1— Draft Planning Commission Resolution approving CUP 8-04 CITY OF SAN JACINTO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM: INITIAL STUDY Project Case Type (s) and Number(s): Conditional Use Permit 8-04 Lead Agency Name: City of San Jacinto Address: 248 E. Main Street Contact Person: David Clayton Telephone Number: 909-487-7330 Applicant's Name: Tarn Taylor - Cingular Wireless Address: 3345 Michelson Drive, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92612 I. PROJECT INFORMATION A. Project Description (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to project grading, later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation): A proposal by Cingular Wireless to construct in the Park Hill zone, a 32 foot high mono -palm with a antenna array mounted in the palm ball, along with a painted microwave dish, supported by a 12'x20'x10' equipment shelter on an 879 square foot pad. The project is located adjacent to a operational 30 foot high Sprint wireless facility mounted to an existing 24 foot high water tank. B. Type of Project: Site Specific ®; Citywide 0; Community ❑; Policy D. Two or more of the above may apply. A Site Specific Project involves fewer than 1000 property owners in a definable area and results in a change in existing land uses, zoning, open space designations or Community Plan land use designations. If Site Specific Project was checked fill out the remainder of this page. If Site Specific Project was not checked and the project covers a defined area, fill in only Item C "Total Project Area" and G below. C. Total Project Area: 879 square foot lease area To the extent possible, fill out the remaining information for Item "C" as it applies to the project. Residential: Acres ; Lots ; Units ; Projected No. of Residents . Commercial: Acres ; Lots ; Sq. Ft. of Bldg. Area ; Est. No. of Employees Industrial: Acres ; Lots ; Sq. Ft. of Bldg. Area ; Est. No. of Employees Other: 1 D. Assessor's Parcel No(s): 438-300-002 E. Street References: The sites are located on the eastern end of Park Hill west of Park Avenue F. Section, Township & Range Description or reference/attach a Legal Description: G. Brief description of the existing environmental setting of the project site and its surroundings: The lot is graded flat with locally occurring weeds and grasses around the perimeter of the project area. The site is the location of a water tank and cell site. II. APPLICABLE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE POLICIES AND ZONING This page must only be completed for proposals that qualify as Site Specific Projects. The information on this page is not required for projects which are not Site Specific; however, completion of this section is encouraged. A. Community Plan Land Use Allocation Map Information 1. Community Plan, if any: 2. Community Plan Land Use Designation, if any: B. Adopted Specific Plan Information 1. Name and Number of Specific Plan, if any: 2. Specific Plan Planning Area, and Policies, if any: C. Existing Zoning: Park Hill (R-1) D. Proposed Zoning, if any: E. Adjacent and Surrounding Zoning: Park Hill (R-1) III. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below ( ■ ) would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Hazards & Hazardous Materials Public Services Agriculture Resources Hydrology/Water Quality Recreation Air Quality Land Use/Planning Transportation!Traffic Biological Resources Mineral Resources Utilities/Service Systems Cultural Resources Noise Other Geology/Soils Population/Housing Mandatory Findings of Significance IV. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: A PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/NEGATIVE DECLARATION WAS NOT PREPARED I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project, described in this document, have been made or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ✓ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. A PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/NEGATIVE DECLARATION WAS PREPARED I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment NOTHING FURTHER IS REQUIRED because all potentially significant effects (a) have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable legal standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. 4 I find that although all potentially significant effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable legal standards, some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in California Code of Regulations, Section 15162 exist. An ADDENDUM to a previously -certified EIR or Negative Declaration has been prepared and will be considered by the approving body or bodies. I find that at least one of the conditions described in California Code of Regulations, Section 15162 exist, but I further find that only minor additions or changes are necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation; therefore a SUPPLEMENT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required that need only contain the information necessary to make the previous EIR adequate for the project as revised. I find that at least one of the following conditions described in California Code of Regulations, Section 15162, exist and a SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any the following - (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR or negative declaration would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives. Signature David Clayton Printed Name EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 6/24/04 bate For TIM HULTS_ Community Development Director 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in its explanation following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e. g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e. g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 5 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation incorporated, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from "Earlier Analyses" as cited in Section VI may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. California Code of Regulations, Section 15063 (c) (3) (D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: (a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. (b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. (c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address the site -specific conditions for the project. 6) References to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances) should be included. Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The explanation of each issue should identify: (a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and (b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. 6 V. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ASSESSMENT In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 - 21178.1), this Initial Study has been prepared to analyze the proposed project to determine any potential significant impacts upon the environment that would result from construction and implementation of the project. In accordance with California Code of Regulations, Section 15063, this Initial Study is a preliminary analysis prepared by the Lead Agency, the City of San Jacinto, in consultation with other jurisdictional agencies, to determine whether a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, or an Environmental Impact Report is required for the proposed project. The purpose of this Initial Study is to inform the decision -makers, affected agencies, and the public of potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the proposed project. Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated AESTHETICS would the project 1. Scenic Resources a) Have a substantial effect upon a scenic • highway corridor within which it is located? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings and unique or landmark features; • obstruct any prominent scenic vista or view open to the public; or result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Source: Site Visit Findings of Fact: The site is a graded area with an existing water tank and cell site. The project proposes to grade additional land for the use. The site will consist of a 32 foot high mono -palm with the palms fronds. In addition, the site will consist of a 12x20x10 equipment shelter. The area is largely undeveloped and is located well off Park Avenue. Because of the elevated location, the site will be visible from most directions. Mitigation: The site is required to be stealthed and meet the height requirements of the zone and be surrounded by block walls and a pebble stone equipment enclosure Monitoring: Planning Department 2. Other Lighting Issues a) Create a new source of substantial light or glare • which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? b) Expose residential property to unacceptable light levels? • 7 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: Findings of Fact: The project will produce slightly higher levels of light and glare due to night lighting. However the level of light is considered to be will within acceptable levels. Mitigation: Light on the equipment shelter will be manually operated and on only servicing of equipment Monitoring: AGRICULTURE RESOURCES Would the project 3. Agriculture a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? • b) Conflict with existing agricultural use, or a Williamson Act ( agricultural preserve) contract (Riv. Co. Agricultural Land Conservation Contract Maps)? • c) Cause development of non-agricultural uses within 300 feet of agriculturally zoned property? • d) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? • Source: SJGP (MEA-IV-15) Findings of Fact: The site is located on a hillside and is not used for agriculture purposes Mitigation: None Monitoring: AIR QUALITY Would the project 4. Air Quality Impacts a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? • b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? • 8 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? • d) Expose sensitive receptors which are located within 1 mile of the project site to project substantial point source emissions? • e) Involve the construction of a sensitive receptor located within one mile of an existing substantial point source emitter? • f) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? • Source: Findings of Fact: Because of the size of the leased area, of Grading and construction activities will generate very short term dust, smoke and odors. Mitigation: None Monitoring: B&S BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the project 5. Wildlife & Vegetation a) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state conservation plan? • b) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any endangered, or threatened species, as listed in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (Sections 670.2 or 670.5) or in Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations (Sections 17.11 or 17.12)? • c) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Wildlife Service? • 9 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? • e) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? • f) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? • g) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? • Source: Site Visit Findings of Fact: Routine weed abatement has occurred on the site, a brief investigation of the site, for evidence of threatened or endangered species was not found. As such, there will be no impact on endangered species. Mitigation: None Monitoring: CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project 6. Historic Resources a) Alter or destroy an historic site? • b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in California Code of Regulations, Section 15064.5? • Source: Findings of Fact: The site is vacant and approval of the project will not offset or destroy historical resources. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 10 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Archaeological Resources a) Alter or destroy an archaeological site. • b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Section 15064.5? • c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? • d) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? • Source: Findings of Fact: The approval of this project will not destroy archaeological resources Mitigation: None Monitoring: 8. Paleontological Resources Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? • Source: Findings of Fact: The approval of this project will not destroy paleontological resources. Mitigation: None Monitoring: GEOLOGY AND SOILS Definitions for Land Use Suitability Ratings Where indicated below, the appropriate Land Use Suitability Rating(s) has been underlined. NA - Not Applicable S - Generally Suitable PS - Provisionally Suitable U - Generally Unsuitable R — Restricted a. Would the oroiect expose oeoole or structures to potential substantial adverse effects. includina the risk of loss. injury, or death involving: II Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated 9. Alquist-Priolo Special Studies or County Fault Hazard Zones Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State • Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? A-P Zones NA PS ✓ U R CFH Zones NA PS V U R Source: Special Studies Zone Map review Findings of Fact: The site is not in a known seismic/fault hazard area. The site is vacant with no active agricultural uses and no unique landforms or features. Mitigation: Monitoring: 10. Liquefaction Potential Zone Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? • NA S✓ PS U R Source: SJGP (MEA-IV-6) Findings of Fact: Liquefaction is generally not a problem in the San Jacinto area because ground water levels tend to be in excess of 30 feet deep. Mitigation: Monitoring: 11. Groundshaking Zone Strong seismic ground shaking? • NA S PS ✓ U R Source: SJGP (MEA-IV-6) Findings of Fact: Strong ground shaking accompany earthquakes generated by slippage on the San Jacinto or Casa Loma faults is probably the most important geologic hazard in the planning area. Evaluation of the intensity of the ground during large earthquakes during recent earthquakes indicate that the area is subject to particularly strong ground shaking. Mitigation: Building standards, including provisions for stabilization are routinely applied to all structures built in this area. Monitoring: Building Department 12 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated 12. Landslide Risk NA S PS U R Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, collapse, or rockfall hazards? • Source: Findings of Fact: Land slides and slope instability are relatively minor hazards in the urbanized portions of the San Jacinto. They represent a severe hazard in the northern portion, where the valley floor intersects with the San Jacinto Mountains. This tentative map is not located in the area where the valley floor intersects with the mountains. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 13. Ground Subsidence Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in ground subsidence? • Source: SJGP (MEA-IV-6) Findings of Fact: Settlement occurs along fault traces as a result of differential movement probably due to water extraction. This site is not located in a known subsidence area. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 14. Other Geologic Hazards • Such as seiche, mudflow or volcanic hazard? Source: Site Visit Findings of Fact: The site being developed is not located in a flood zone but is located near a source of standing water. Mitigation: None Monitoring: b. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 15. Slopes a) Change topography or ground surface relief features? • b) Create cut or fill slopes greater than 2:1 or higher than 10 feet? • c) Result in grading that affects or negates subsurface sewage disposal systems? • Source: Plan Review Findings of Fact: The site is relatively flat. The proposal is riot creating slopes higher than 10 feet and no slopes will be greater than 50% Mitigation: None Monitoring: 16. Soils a) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? • b) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? • Source: USDA Soil Conservation Service Survey Findings of Fact: The soil type in this area is not subject to expansion Mitigation: None Monitoring: 17. Erosion a) Change deposition, siltation or erosion which • may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of a lake? b) Result in any increase in water erosion either on or • off site? Source: Findings of Fact: Because of the area will remain largely open and will be able to absorb storm flows Mitigation: None Monitoring: 14 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 18. Wind Erosion and Blowsand from project either on or off site Be impacted by or result in an increase in wind erosion and blowsand, either on or off site? • Source: Findings of Fact: Wind driven erosion is a factor in the river bottom area. Therefore wind driven erosion is not considered a significant issue. Mitigation: None Monitoring: HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project 19. Hazards and Hazardous Materials a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? • b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? • c) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? • d) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? • e) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? • Source: SJGP Findings of Fact: The approval of this project will not increase the risk of upset, interfere with emergency response or adversely impact human health. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 15 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 20. Airports a) Result in an inconsistency with an Airport Master Plan? • b) Require review by the Airport Land Use Commission? • c) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? • d) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, or heliport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? • Source: Findings of Fact: The project is not located within an airport control zone. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 21. Hazardous Fire Area Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? • Source: Findings of Fact: The Riverside County General Plan indicates that the site is not located in a high fire hazard area Mitigation: None Monitoring: HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the project I6 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 22. Water Quality Impacts a) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? • b) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? • c) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? • d) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? • e) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? • f) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? • g) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? • Source: SJGP, Flood insurance Map Findings of Fact: The project is not located within a 100 or 500 year flood zone (Zone X unshaded). Mitigation: None Monitoring: 17 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 23. Floodplains NA U R • a) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? b) Changes in absorption rates or the rate and amount of surface runoff? • c) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam (Dam Inundation Area)? • d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? • Source: Project Map Findings of Fact:. The site has already been disturbed with the installation of the water tank. There will be a small amount of grading and compaction to create the lease area Mitigation: The project is conditioned to prepare grading plan in accordance with City Engineer's direction. Monitoring: City Engineer LAND USE/PLANNING Would the project 24. Land Use a) Result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? • b) Affect land use within a city sphere of influence and/or within adjacent city or county boundaries? • Source: Findings of Fact: The General Plan calls for residential land uses. The use proposed is consistent with this land use designation. The Comprehensive General Plan Update retain the residential land use designation Mitigation: None Monitoring: 25. Planning a) Be consistent with the site's existing or proposed zoning? • 18 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact b) Be compatible with existing surrounding zoning? • c) Be compatible with existing and planned surrounding land uses? • d) Be consistent with the land use designations and policies of the Comprehensive General Plan (including those of any applicable Specific Plan)? • e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? • Source: Findings of Fact: The site is currently zone Park Hill. The proposed project is conditioned to be developed consistent within the limitations on this zoning designation. Mitigation: None Monitoring: Planning Department MINERAL RESOURCES Would the project 26. Mineral Resources a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource in an area classified or designated by the State that would be of value to the region or the residents of the State? • b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally - important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? • c) Be an incompatible land use located adjacent to a State classified or designated area or existing surface mine? • d) Expose people or property to hazards from proposed, existing or abandoned quarries or mines? • 19 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: Findings of Fact: There are several sources of sand and gravel quarry operations. These are located in the northern part of the city and county areas. The most significant extraction operation is in the San Jacinto River. The proposal is not located where it would impact mining operations. Mitigation: None Monitoring: NOISE Would the project result in Definitions for Noise Acceptability Ratings Where indicated below, the appropriate Noise Acceptability Rating(s) has been underlined. NA - Not Applicable A - Generally Acceptable B - Conditionally Acceptable C - Generally Unacceptable D - Land Use Discouraged 27. Airport Noise a) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? NAVABCD • b) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? NA✓ A B C D • Source: Findings of Fact: The project is not located within flight patterns of an existing airport or private airstrip. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 28. Railroad Noise • NA✓ A B C D 20 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: Findings of Fact: The project will not be impacted by railroad noise Mitigation: None Monitoring: 29. Highway Noise • NA A B C D Source: Findings of Fact: The primary source of noise is from motor vehicles. With land use intensification and more traffic, noise levels increase. However, estimates of the increase in community noise exposure are not expected to be significant. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 30. Other Noise • NA A B C D Source: Findings of Fact: Mitigation: Monitoring: 31. Noise Effects on or by the Project a) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? • b) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? • c) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? • d) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? • ?t Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: Findings of Fact: The intensity of the proposed use is similar to surrounding existing uses. Approval of the project may slightly increase noise levels. Mitigation: None Monitoring: POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the project 32. Housing a) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? • b) Create a demand for additional housing, particularly housing affordable to households earning 80% or less of the County's median income? • c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? • d) Affect a City Redevelopment Project Area? • e) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? • f) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? • Source: Findings of Fact: The approval of the project will not increase population and housing in the area. Therefore, the proposal is not expected to alter population projections. Mitigation: None Monitoring: PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities or the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 33. Fire Services I • I Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: SJGP Findings of Fact: The project is within 5 minute response time of Station 25. The proposal may result in an incremental increase in demand for fire services. The City has adopted Fire Station mitigation fees; however, these fees are insufficient to cover the costs of additional facilities, equipment and service personnel. To compensate for this shortfall, formation of a district to fund essential fire services has been established. With the formation and annexation into this district, it is anticipated that any significant negative impacts due to fire services would be mitigated to a level of insignificance. Mitigation: The applicant shall join districts' formed to provide essential fire services Monitoring: Plannin 34. Police Services Source: 9 • Findings of Fact: The project is within the jurisdiction of the San Jacinto Police Department. The City has adopted Public Safety mitigation fees; however, these fees are insufficient to cover the cost of providing additional facilities, equipment and service personnel. To compensate for this shortfall, formation of a district to fund essential public services has occurred. Annexing into the district mitigates the impact of this project to a level of insignificance. Mitigation: The applicant shall join any districts' to provide essential police services. Monitoring: Plannin 35. Schools Source: SJGP 9 • Findings of Fact: The project proposal will result in incremental increase in demand for schools. State law provides for collection of school fees to mitigate the increased demand. Therefore, with the payment of required school fees, there will be less of a significant impact to schools. Mitigation: School fees shall be paid in accordance with State Law Monitoring: Building Department 36. Libraries Source: • Findings of Fact: The project proposal will result in an incremental increase in demand for libraries, however, the size of the project is such that the anticipated impact should be minimal. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 37. Health Services • Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: SJGP Findings of Fact: The project proposal will result in an incremental increase in demand for health services, however, the size of the project is such that the anticipated impact should not be significant. Mitigation: Monitoring: RECREATION 38. Parks and Recreation a) Would the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? • b) Would the project include the use of existing neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? • c) Is the project located within a C.S.A. or recreation and park district with a Community Parks and Recreation Plan (Quimby fees)? • Source: Findings of Fact: Because this is a non-residential project, this project will not be required to pay park fees. Mitigation: None Monitoring: Building Department 39. Recreational Trails. • Source: Findings of Fact: The project is not located adjacent to any recreational trails. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated. Mitigation: None Monitoring: TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Would the project ?4 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 40. Circulation a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? • b) Result in inadequate parking capacity? • c) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated road or highways? • d) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? • e) Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic? • f) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g. , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? • g) Cause an effect upon, or a need for new or altered maintenance of roads? • h) Cause an effect upon circulation during the project's construction? • i) Result in inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? • j) Conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? • Source: Findings of Fact: There are no anticipated impacts to transportation and traffic. Mitigation: Traffic signal mitigation fees in accordance with the current fee ordinance. Monitoring: Building Dapartment 41. Bike Trails 25 • Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: Findings of Fact: The project is not within a bike trail system; therefore, there are no significant impacts to bike trails. Mitigation: None Monitoring: UTILITY AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project 42. Water a) Require or result in the construction of new water treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects? • b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? • Source: Findings of Fact: The project is located in the EMWD service area. Water service will be available to the project after the appropriate plans have been approved and fees paid. Therefore, there is no anticipated significant impact to water availability. Mitigation: None Monitoring: EMWD 43. Sewer a) Require or result in the construction of new wastewater treatment facilities, including • septic systems, or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects? b) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may service the project that it has adequate • capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? 26 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: Findings of Fact: The project is located in the EMWD sewer service area. Sewer service will be available to the project after the appropriate plans have been approved and fees paid. Therefore, there is no anticipated significant impact to sewer availability. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 44. Solid Waste a) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? • b) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid wastes (including the CIWMP (County Integrated • Waste Management Plan)? Source: Findings of Fact: The city provides solid waste disposal on a contractual basis. Waste disposal service will be available to the project. Building contractors will be required to dispose of construction debris at a local landfill or contract with the trash provider for refuse removal. Mitigation: Project is conditioned to provide refuse disposal to each lot within the land division. Monitoring: 45. Utilities Would the project impact the following facilities requiring or resulting in the construction of new facilities or the expansion of existing facilities; the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? a) Electricity? • b) Natural gas? • c) Communications systems? • d) Storm water drainage? • e) Street lighting? • f) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? • g) Other governmental services? • h) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? • 2? Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: Planning Department Findings of Fact: In accordance with State requirements, the project plans have been forwarded to appropriate service providers. Not of the service providers have indicated that they would not be able to provide service to the project. Any comments received from the utilities have been forwarded to the applicant. There fore there are no anticipated significant impacts to utilities. Mitigation: None Monitoring: OTHER 46. Other: Source: Findings of Fact: Mitigation: Monitoring: 47. Other: Source: Findings of Fact: Mitigation: Monitoring: 48. Other Source: Findings of Fact: Mitigation: Monitoring: • • • MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 28 Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 49. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare, or endangered plant or animal to eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? • Source: This initial study Findings of Fact: No significant impacts on the environment, of habitat of fish or wildlife are anticipated 50. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment • is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) Source: This initial study Findings of Fact: No significant long or short-term environmental impacts are anticipated 51. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects as defined in California • Code of Regulations, Section 15130)? Source: This review Findings of Fact: No impacts are expected 52. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on • human beings, either directly or indirectly? Source: This initial study Findings of Fact: No direct or indirect significant negative impacts are ainticipated 19 VI. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. California Code of Regulations, Section 15063 (c) (3) (D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: Earlier Analyses Used, if any: Location Where Earlier Analyses, if used, are available for review: 30 Conditions of Approval - Conditional Use Permit 8-04 Planning Department 1. The applicant shall agree to indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the City, its officers, agents and employees, from any and all liability or claims that may be brought against the City arising out of its approval of this permit, or arising out of operation of the facility, save and except that caused by City's active negligence. 2. The use hereby permitted is for a wireless telecommunication facility consisting of 32' mono -palm located on APN: 438-300-002. The effective date of issuance of this permit is the date it is ratified by the City Council. The applicant must activate the permit within one-year after ratification or it shall become null and void. 3. The mono -palm shall be constructed to permit co -location on the tree trunk. The antenna array shall be permitted in the palm ball structure. 4. All applicable development fees effective at the time of issuance of the building permit shall be paid. 5. All new and existing utilities shall be located underground as per Ordinance #820. 6. Exterior lighting shall be a manually -operated or motion detector controlled light above the equipment shelter door. Light shall be kept off except when personnel are actually present at night. 7. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all utility substructures shall be located and/or screened with landscaping material so as to minimize visibility from the public right of way. 8. Prior to the issuance of a preliminary (rough) grading permit, the developer shall submit a soils report to the Planning Department. 9. Grading and public improvements shall be installed in accordance with City standards and specifications. The tops of all graded slopes shall be at the property line. 10. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit landscape and automatic watering system plans for the facility. Landscaping improvements shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy. 11. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit landscape and automatic watering system plans for the facility. Landscaping improvements shall include the installation of one 20-foot and one 30-foot high palm tree. Improvements shall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy. 12. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, the developer shall install a 6-foot high split face block wall around the facility. Access to the facility shall be through two 6-foot wide iron rod gates with a mesh backing and a "Knox" rapid entry lock or box. Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. 13. Antennas and all support structures shall be painted to match the color of the palm fronds. 14. Simulated palm trunk, the cladding on the steel monopole shall consist of a textured coating and etched in a manner to emulate the appearance of the trunk of a palm tree. 15. The equipment shelter shall be 12'x20'x10' and shall consist of an insulated prefabricated metal structure with an exposed aggregate exterior. 16. This use permit may be modified or revoked by the City Council or Planning Commission should they determine that the proposed use or conditions under which it is being operated or maintained is detrimental to the public health, welfare or materially injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or if the property is operated or maintained so as to constitute a public nuisance. 17. The facility operator or property owner is responsible for maintaining the facility in an appropriate manner consistent with the original approval of the Wireless Telecommunication Facility. Should the use be replaced or discontinued for a period of six months, the approvals will lapse and the facility operator shall remove the poles and equipment and restore the site to the original condition. JUL- 7-04 VIED 9'24 AM RIV CO FIRE P&E FAX NO. 9099554886 Tom Tisdale Fire Chief Proudly serving the unincorporated areas of ttiver idc County and the cities of: tanning Bem nnoLI Celia ti6 Canyon Lake a Desertlicit Springs 4 Indian Wells Indio + Lake Elsinore M t $ Quirtta Mot Valley Palm Pc x t Penis Rancho Mirage San Jacinto Temecula Board of Supwiwrs Bob Buster, District 1 John ravaglione, District 2 Jiro Venable, listrict 3 Ray Wilson, District 4 11,1aicnt Ashley, District 5 Riverside County Fire Department In cooperation with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection P, 1 40801.ectors Street, 2q° Moor • Riverside, California 92501 • (909) 955-4777 • Fax (9(19) 955-4886 Fire Protection Plunnieg and Engineering Services Section 17J3e— ?Gp--•ne'Z City of San Jacinto David Clayton 07-07-04 248 E. Main Street San Jacinto, Ca. 92583 Re: CUP 8-04 Fire Department conditions. 1. Provide "KNOX" lock at access gate to project. 2. Display emergency contact information at access gate. 3. Maintain a minimum 2A-10-BC portable fire extinguisher either at the site or on any vehicle used to service the site. Scott DeForge, Captain Planning Section RESOLUTION NO. 04-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN UNMANNED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY CONSISTING OF A 32' MONO -PALM FOR PROPERTY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1500 FEET WEST OF PARK AVENUE ON PARK HILL: CUP NO. 8-04. WHEREAS, Cingular Wireless filed an application on May 27, 2004, File No. CUP 8-04, for a conditional use permit to allow the establishment of a wireless telecommunication facility consisting of a 32' mono -palm ("Application") on approximately 879 square feet of land, APN: 438-300-002 ("Subject Site"); WHEREAS, the property affected by the Application is within the Park Hill (R-1) zoning district; WHEREAS, the Application was reviewed, studied, and found to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") as more fully described below; WHEREAS, on August 12, 2004, the Planning Commission of the City of San Jacinto ("Commission") conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application at which time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the Application were heard and the Application was comprehensively reviewed; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Based on the entire record before the Commission, all written and oral evidence presented to the Commission, and the findings set forth in this Resolution, the Commission grants Conditional Use Permit No. 8-04 to allow the establishment of an unmanned wireless telecommunications facility consisting of a 32' mono -palm on the Subject Site, subject to the conditions of approval in Exhibit "A" ("CUP"). SECTION 2. Based on the entire record before the Commission and all written and oral evidence presented to the Commission, including the staff report, the Commission finds as follows: A. The Subject Site for which the CUP is granted is in accordance with the objectives of the City of San Jacinto Development Code and the purposes of the R-1 General Commercial zoning district because the Commission has determined that use of the subject site is similar to and no more objectionable than any other conditional uses allowed within the zoning district. B. The CUP is consistent with the General Plan of the City of San Jacinto ("General Plan"), will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, and will not be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity because: 1. The CUP provides for land uses compatible with the surrounding land use classification for the Subject Site in the General Plan Land Use Element. 2. The establishment of an unmanned wireless telecommunication facility consisting of a 35' mono -palm authorized by the CUP helps to promote and achieve the proposed location of the wireless telecommunication facility is in accordance with the objectives of Zoning Ordinance 340, and the purpose of the zone in which the site is located: a. Because, the site is located in an area that has been identified in the General Plan for Low Density Residential uses the installation of a 32' mono -palm on an undeveloped residential parcel is consistent with the Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance. The proposed location of the wireless telecommunication facility and the conditions under which it will be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. b. Because, the site is located on a parcel not developed with residential uses. The proposed wireless telecommunication facility complies with the applicable provisions of the San Jacinto Zoning Ordinance 340. c. Because, the site is located in an area that has been identified as an area that is unfavorable for further residential development because of the existing uses. An unmanned telecommunication facility is one of the highest and best uses for the property. Page 6of7 C. The traffic generated by the proposed conditional use will not overload the capacity of the surrounding street system and will not create a hazard to public safety because the use consists of the establishment of an unmanned wireless telecommunication facility consisting of a 32' mono -palm and only routine maintenance would be required. SECTION 3. Based on the entire record before the Planning Commission and all written and oral evidence presented, including the staff report, the Planning Commission finds the nature and extent of the dedications, reservations, impact fees, and other exactions are reasonably related to public needs and roughly proportional to the impacts created by use of the Subject Site. SECTION 4. Based on the entire record before the Planning Commission and all written and oral evidence presented, the Planning Commission finds the CUP complies with CEQA for the following reasons: Although the proposed project could have had a significant effect on the environment, there will not be significant effect in this case because revisions in the project or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur; therefore A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION has been prepared. City Staff is directed to file a Notice of Determination within 5 days of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 26th day of August 2004. Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Commission Secretary Page 7 of 7 11111FIM.IIuJI11111-1 siikw im 111160 ler NE rE:1 IIIIII II Conditional Use Permit 8-04 1111 1 background Contour.shp •%'. City LimitsCitylimits.shp Clines.shp Zoning A C-1 C-2 C-M City Well D-C D-R EMWD Fire Station ® M-1 M-I-P Open Space Park Park Hill R-1 R-1 15,000 R-1 20,000 R-1 PUD R-2 R-2 PUD R-3 R-P R-T RAAB Rancho San Jacin S-D 1 1 School ®SP1-85 1 SP1-91 C W-2 F.A Cove SP Trails SP AGENDA ITEM 5. i September 16, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Special Tax Consultant and City Attorney SUBJECT: Approve and adopt Resolution No. approving the Engineer's Report and Setting Public Hearing for the Annexation of Certain Property into Assessment District No. 2003-01 (AD 2003-1) for Road, Street and Highway Maintenance (AD 2003-1, Annexation No. 4) RECOMMENDATION: By motion, approve and adopt Resolution No. approving engineer's report and setting public hearing for the annexation of territory into Assessment District No. 2003-1. BACKGROUND: At the last City Council meeting, the City Council initiated proceedings to annex certain territory owned by A.C. Ramona, LLC, into Assessment District 2003-1 (the "District"). In order to continue with such proceedings in accordance with assessment district law, the City Council must approve the engineer's report and set a time, date and place for the public hearing. The engineer's report sets forth the rate of the assessment in accordance with the benefit received by each parcel. JUSTIFICATION: The adoption of the resolution is required to continue the annexation process. BUDGETARY IMPACT: The annexation of the property owned by A.C. Ramona, LLC, into the District will have a beneficial impact to the City's budget in that, upon implementation of the proposed annexation to the District, it would assist in the funding of the maintenance of certain roads, streets, and highways that would otherwise come from the City's general fund. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. cingular WIRELESS DIRECTIONS TO SITE TAKE JAMBOREE TO 405 NORTH TO 55 NORTH TO 91 EAST. TAKE THE CA 60.1-215 SOUTH TOWARDS IND/O. TAKE 74 EAST TOWARDS HEMET, CONTINUE ON 74/79 TOWARDS HEMET, BECOMES 74/FLORIDA A. TURN LEFT ON SOBOBA, LEFT ON LINCOLN. FOLLOW UNCOLN PARK. DRIVEWAY IS OFF PARK AT INTERSECTION OF UNCOLN NEXT TO MINI-200. FOLLOW DIRT ROAD TO TOP OF HILL THOMAS EROS. PC/GRID: B11 F6 Vicinity Map SCALE: N.T.S. SC-300-01-P1 MINI -ZOO 4090 PARK AVE. HEMET, CA 92544 APPLICANT CINGULAR WIRELESS CONTACT: KEVIN HERRING 3345 MICHELSON DRIVE, SUITE 100 IRVINE, CA 92612 (949) 437 8400 CONSULTANTS VELOCITEL, INC. CONTACT:JIM OSEA 18071 FITCH AVENUE, SUITE 200 IRVINE, CA 92614 PHONE: (949) 809 4999 x 2716 FAX: (949) 553 3917 OWNER SAN JACINTO DEV INC. PO BOX 490 SAN JACINTO, CA 92581 CONTACT: JESSIE MINOR OR WAYNE MINOR (SON) PHONE: (909) 225 5200 SAC - VELOCITEL NAME: KATHY O'CONNOR-PHELPS PHONE: (949) 929 8827 PLANNER - VELOCITEL NAME: KATHY O'CONNOR PHELPS PHONE: (949) 929-8827 ADA COMPLIANCE NOT APPLICABLE FOR UBC 1103.1.1-1 ASSESSOR'S IDENTIFICATION 438-290-027 ZONING R-1/PARK HILL ZONE SHEET !WW2 T-1 TITLE SHEET C-1 TOPOGRAPHIC SITE SURVEY A -I SITE PLAN A-2 ENLARGER PARTIAL SITE PLAN, ANTENNA CONFIGURATION AND SHELTER PLAN A-3 EAST ELEVATION AND WEST ELEVATION A-4 NORTH ELEVATION AND SOUTH ELEVATION PROPOSED PROJECT: AN UNMANNED, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION PCS EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION I. THIS EXHIBIT MAY BE REPLACED BY A LAND SURVEY OR SITE PLAN OF THE PREMISES ONCE IT IS RECEIVED 3Y LESSEE. 2. SETBACK GE THE PREMISES FROM THE LESSOR'S BOUNDARIES SHALL BE THE DISTANCE REQUIRED BY THE APPLICABLE GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES. 3. WIDTH OF THE ACCESS ROAD SHALL BE THE WIDTH REQUIRED BY THE APPLICABLE AUTHORITIES, INCLUDING POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS. 4. THE TYPE, NUMBER AND MOUN➢NG POSITIONS AND LOCATIONS OF ANTENNAS AND TRANSMISSION UNES ARE ILLUSTRATNE ONLY. ACTUAL TIDES, NUMBERS, AND MOUNTING POSITIONS MAY VARY FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ABOVE. APPROVALS CW MANAGER CONSTRUCTION COORDINATOR INTERCONNECT ENGINEER RF ENGINEER SITE ACQUISITION PLANNING AEC LANDLORD PRINT NAME SIGNATURE DATE PROJECT SUMMARY: INSTALLATION OF NEW 12° X 20' CINGULAR EQUIPMENT FIRE RAT SHELTER AT GRADE INSTALLAT ON OF NEW 32.-0" HIGH MONOPALM WITH (3) SECTORS ANTENNAS AND (2) ANTENNAS PER SECTOR. INSTALLAT ON OF (1) 2'0 MICROWAVE DISH INSTALLAT ON OF GPS, LMU AND E91I ANTENNA 200A ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO EOUIPMENT ANTENNA SCHEDULE SECTOR QUANTITY AZIMUTH EST. LENGTH COAX EN CLAN A 4 0' DEGREES 80'-0" (8) 7/8" 27' B 4 120' DEGREES 50'-a" (8) 7/8" 27' C 4 230' DEGREES 80'-0" (8) 7/8' 27' PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE WFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF ORAWUJCS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE CREWMAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO GNGUTAR WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROMPTED. DATE: 01/29/04 APPROVED BY: JO DRAWN BY: NJT CHECK BY: JO REVISIONS REV I DATE DESCRIPTION: BY: t i OV29104 I PARR EXHIBIT NJT 2 1 06613104 PRFLM. ZONING NJT 3 1 08/17104 REVISED ZONING NJT SITE NUMBER: SC-300-01-P1 SITE TYPE: MONOPALM ANTENNA INSTALLATION SITE LOCATION: 4090 PARK AVE HEMET, CA 92544 RNERSIDE COUNTY TITLE: TRIG SHEET SHEET NUMBER: T-1 'PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE 0R DISCLOSURE 0111ER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO CIRCULAR WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED, DATE: B/16/04 APPROVED BY: ES DRAWN BY: LP CHECK BY: ES REVISIONS REV: 3r 1Np1 ANTENNA S9' HOT TONER 39.0 HON ANTENNA 39.6' HQ1 ANTENNA ( 39.6' 41104 ANTENNA r I GEN OIAINLINK FENCE CONtl1ETE CABINET 1 1 1 1 1 I ` 1 \ 1\a i TOP OF BAHR BUSIES CTN.) VAULT PROPOSED 10'R16' ONCVUR LEASE AREA POSIRON OF GEODETIC COORDINATES r NKR GATE 3B' Nld ANTENNAS Cr T_ ]C NKR ANTENNAS \ 5 (�� �- 30' NIGH ANTENNAS 11 1, 1 I '^ /j+.3^� __- •f ,)' CABINET PORED POLE WM TELCO �Iy` .•.' "^ -� _ _. ( syA6 16' N101 NIQ10WAYE EDGE a oar ROAD LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS DIRECTIONS TO SITE TAKE CA-55 NORTH TOWARDS RIVERSIDE. TAKE THE CA-91 EAST EXIT TOWARDS RIVERSIDE TAKE 1HE CA-50 EAST/1-215 SOUTH EXIT TOWARDS INDIO. TAKE THE CA-14 EAST EXIT TOWARDS HEMET. CONTINUE ON CA-74 - G0. CONTINUE ON CA-T4/CA-T9. CONTINUE ON CA-T4. TURN LEFT ON N STMIFORD ST. TURN RICHT ON PARK AVE VICINITY MAP - N.T.S. BENCHMARK PROJECT ELEVATION ESTABUSHED FROM CPS DERIVED ORTHCMETRIC HEIGHTS, APPLNING GEOID 99 SEPARATIONS, CONSTRAINING TO RCS CONTROL STATION ESRW ELEVATION. 1906' (NAV058) RASIS OF REARING BEARINGS SHOWED HEREON ARE BASED UPON U.S. STATE PLANE MADE] COORDINATE SYSTEM CALIFORNIA STATE PLANE CODROWATE2ONE6, DETERMINED BY GP5 OBSERVATIONS. SI IRVFY DATE 2/20/04 SI)RVFYOR'S NOTE4 A TITLE REPORT WAS NOT PROVIDED AT THE TIME THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED. ANY EASEMENTS CR OTHER ITEMS CONTAINED 1M1HIN 1HE TITLE REPORT WHICH MAY AFFECT THE LEASE AREA HAVE NOT BEEN PLOTTED. THE BOUNDARY SHOWN HEREON 15 PLOTTED FROM RECORD INFORMATION AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY. UTII ITY NOTFS SURVEYOR DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THEIR LOCATIONS. IT IS THE RE5P0NSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND DEVELOPER TO CONTACT BLUE STAKE ANO ANY OTHER INVOLVED AGENCIES TO LOCATE ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REMOVAL, RELOCATION AND/ OR REPLACEMENT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. PROJECT INFORMATION DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: O 2/25/04 PAwN. SUMIu LP cn W 0) c U X SITE NUMBER: SC-300-01 SITE TYPE: RAWLAND SITE LOCATION: 4090 PARK AVE. HEMET, CA & 92544 TITLE: PRELIM. SUBMITTAL SHEET NUMBER: C - 1 EXISTIN AC 55 G EXISTING CB(JCRETE EXISTING 37. HIGH ANTENNA EXISTING 59' HIGH TOWER EXISTING 39.6' HIGH ANTENNA EXISTING 18' HIGH MICROWAVE EDGE OF EXISTING DIRT ROAD TOP OF BANK BUSHES (TYP.) EXISTING 6'-0 HIGH CHAINLINK FENCE PATH 12' BARB `-EXISTING VAULT CONC. DRAIN EXISTING CABINET EXISTING POWER POLE WITH TELCO PROPOSED P.O.C. EXISTING ACCESS GATE EXISTING BUSH TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED 12'X20' CINGULAR FIRE RATED EQUIPMENT SHELTER WITHIN A 879.-0- S.F. OF LEASE AREA PROPOSED CINGULAR (3) SECTORS ANTENNAS WITH (2) OUAD POLE ANTENNA PER SECTOR MOUNTED STACKED WITH TOP ANTENNA INSIDE PINEAPPLE AND BOTTOM ANTENNA INSIDE TRUNK PROPOSED CINGULAR 32' HIGH MONOPALM XISTINC 6' HIGH ACCESS GATE TO I BE RELOCATED p PROPOSED CHAINUN r�G1 J1� / " SeCr FENCE TO MATCH ▪ g2iyG,0 �ExISnNc ..1., @n L0 .\�"� Je y ii PROPOSED 12DIA. MONOPALM LE SE AREA PROPOSED N�W • E%ISPNG GATE LOCATION 30' HIGH ANTENNAS PROPOSED POWER AND TELCO TRENCH NORTH PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWNOS 15 PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTNER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO ONGUTAR WIRELESS 19 STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DATE: 01/29/04 APPROVED BY: JO DRAWN BY: NJT CHECK BY: JO REVISIONS DSD3164 0517/04 DESCRIPTION: LEASE EXHIBIT PRELIM. ZONING REVISED ZONING SITE NUMBER: SC-300-01-P1 SITE TYPE MCNOPALM ANTENNA INSTALLATION SITE LOCATION: 4090 PARK AVE. HEMET, CA 92544 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: EMERGENCY GENERAL LUG BOX TELCO CABINET PROPOSED MICROWAVE RACK COAX CABLE ENTRY PORT SHELTER PLAN ANTENNA CONFIGURATION 200A METER PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURE TELCO BACKBOARD 66 BLOCK ELECTRICAL PANEL CEILING MOUNTED COAX CABLE TRAY 20.-0" BATTERY CAQINEI BATTERY CABINET PROPOSED CINGULAR (3) SECTORS ANTENNAS WITH (2) QUAD POLE ANTENNA PER SECTOR MOUNTED STACKED WITH TOP ANTENNA INSIDE PINEAPPLE AND BOTTOM ANTENNA INSIDE TRUNK PROPOSED 32' HIGH MONOPALM NORTH 3/4.,1,-0. PROPOSED CINGULAR (3) SECTORS ANTENNAS WITH (2) QUAD POLE ANTENNA PER SECTOR MOUNTED STACKED WITH TOP ANTENNA INSIDE PINEAPPLE AND BOTTOM ANTENNA INSIDE TRUNK PROPOSED CINGULAR 32' HIGH MONOPALM PROPOSED NEW GATE LOCATION ENLARGED SITE PLAN i i EXISTING BUSH TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED 12'X20' CINGULAR FIRE RATED EQUIPMENT SHELTER WITHIN A 879.-0" S.F. OF LEASE AREA d 7 EXISTING 6 HIGH ACCESS GATE TO BE RFjLOCATED PROPOSED CHAINLINK FENC TO MATCH EXISTI G PROPOSED 12' DIA. MONOPALM LEASE AREA PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED to IRIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE ANY USE DR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO CINGULAR WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DATE 01l29104 APPROVED BY: JO DRAWN BY: NJT CHECK BY: JO REVISIONS REV, DATE DESCRIPTION: BY: 01/29/04 LEASE EXHIBIT NIT 2 05/03/04 PRELIM. ZONING N.R 3 03NT/04 REVISED ZONING NJT w cc SITE NUMBER: SC-300-01-P1 SITE TYPE: MONOPALIA ANTENNA INSTALLATION SITE LOCATION: 4090 PARK AVE. HEEET, CA 92544 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TITLE: ENLARGED SITE PLAN, SHELTER PLAN AND ANTENNA CONFIGURATION SHEET NUMBER: A-2 EXISTING WATER TANK EXISTING 30' HIGH- . CELLULAR ANTENNAS BY OTHER EXISTING 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH 12" BARB WIRES EXISTING 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE SPRINT LEASE AREA EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE EXISTING BTS— EQUIPMENT CABINETS PROPOSED CINGULAR — --. 32' HIGH MONOPALM EXISTING RELOCATED—' ACCESS GATE EAST ELEVATION PROPOSED CINGULAR (3) SECTORS ANTENNAS WITH (2) QUAD POLE ANTENNA PER SECTOR MOUNTED STACKED WITH TOP ANTENNA INSIDE PINEAPPLE AND BOTTOM ANTENNA INSIDE TRUNK TOP OF MONOPALM FRONDS 32.-0" A.G.L. TOP OF TOP ANTENNAS TOP OF BOTTOM ANTENNAS 20'-0" A.C.L. —PROPOSED 2'0 PROPOSED CINGULAR MICROWAVE LMU, GPS/E911 ANTENNA DISH PAINTED TO MATCH -PROPOSED RATED I EQUIPMENTGULAR SHELTER MONOPALM GRADE LEVEL 0'-0" A.G.L. —EXISTING ACCESS GATE TO BE RELOCATED PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO CINGULAR WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DATE 01129104 APPROVED BY: JO DRAWN BY: NJT CHECK BY: JO REVISIONS REV DATE DESCRIPTION: BY: 01U2BIG4 LEASE EXHIER NJT 2 05/031104 PRELIM. ZONING NJT 0 GM17104 REVISED ZONING NJT 0 > N EE z 0 ce 0 J w w J O O F Z M VI PROPOSED CINGULAR (3) SECTORS ANTENNAS WITH (2) QUAD POLE ANTENNA PER SECTOR MOUNTED STACKED WITH TOP ANTENNA INSIDE PINEAPPLE AND BOTTOM ANTENNA INSIDE TRUNK L, TOP OF MONOPALM FRONDS Y 32'-0" A.G.L. TOP OF TOP ANTENNAS 26.-0" A.G.L. _....__..._ TOP OF BOTTOM ANTENNAS 20'-O" A.G.L. PROPOSED CINGULAR LMU, GPS/E9I1 ANTENNA PROPOSED 12'X20_- CINGULAR FIRE RATED EQUIPMENT SHELTER d GRADE LEVEL v 0'-0" A.G.L. =PROPOSED CINGULAR 32' HIGH MONOPALM PROPOSED 2'OMICROWAVE DISH PAINTED TO MATCH MONOPALM SCALE VB•-T-0• 1 EXISTING WATER TANK EXISTING 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH 12" BARB WIRES EXISTING BTS EQUIPMENT CABINETS SITE NUMBER SC-300-01-P1 SITE TYPE: MONOPALM ANTENNA INSTALLATION SITE LOCATION: 4090 PARK AVE HEMET, CA 92544 RNERSIDEE COUNTY TITLE: NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER: WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1/8'-P-O' 2 A-3 EXISTING 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH 12" BARB WIRES TOP OF MONOPALM FRONDS 32.-0" A.G.L. 45 TOP OF TOP ANTENNAS 26'-0" A.C.L. TOP OF BOTTOM ANTENNAS 20.-0" A.C.L. PROPOSED CINGULAR --� LMU, GPS/E911 ANTENNA PROPOSED 12'X20' CINGULAR FIRE RATED EQUIPMENT SHELTER SOUTH ELEVATION PROPOSED CINGULAR 32' HIGH MONOPALM -PROPOSED CINGULAR (3) SECTORS ANTENNAS WITH (2) QUAD POLE ANTENNA PER SECTOR MOUNTED STACKED WITH TOP ANTENNA INSIDE PINEAPPLE AND BOTTOM ANTENNA INSIDE TRUNK PROPOSED 2'0 MICROWAVE DISH PAINTED TO MATCH MONOPALM -EXISTING ACCESS GATE PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS 15 PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN 1 THAT WHICH RELATES TO CINGULAR WIRELESS 15 STRICTLY PROHIBITED. DATE: 01/29/04 APPROVED BY: JO DRAWN BY: NJT CHECK BY: JO REVISIONS REV DATE DESCRIPTION: BY: 1 D1129N4 LEASE E%HISR NJT 2 D5f03104 PREUM. ZONING NR 3 08/17104 REVISED ZONING NJT PROPOSED CINGULAR 32' HIGH MONOPALM TOP OF MONOPALM FRONDS 32'-0" A.G.L. TOP OF TOP ANTENNAS 26.-0" A.G.L. TOP OF BOTTOM ANTENNAS 20'-O" A.G.L. EXISTING ACCESS GATE \v SCALE 1/B'"T-0' 1 PROPOSED CINGULAR (3) SECTORS ANTENNAS WITH (2) QUAD POLE ANTENNA PER SECTOR MOUNTED STACKED WITH TOP ANTENNA INSIDE PINEAPPLE AND BOTTOM ANTENNA INSIDE TRUNK PROPOSED 2'0 MICROWAVE DISH PAINTED TO MATCH MONOPALM --PROP05ED CINGULAR LMU, GPS/E911 ANTENNA EXISTING WATER TANK BEYOND PROPOSED 12'X20' CINGULAR FIRE RATED EQUIPMENT SHELTER --EXISTING 6' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH 12" BARB WIRES GRADE LEVEL 0'-0" REF. A.G.L. 44 > N 0 Z Z VI 0 W J 0 O w N F Z IM 7 - M N � SITE NUMBER SC-300-01-P1 SITE TYPE: MONOPALM ANTENNA INSTALLATION SITE LOCATION: 4090 PARK AVE HEMET. CA 92544 RIVERSIDE COUNTY TITLE: EAST AND WEST ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER: NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/8'-T-0' 2 A-4 \ • • SITE PLAN APR( 438-080-004 ZONING: RI LAND USE: 5FR SIZE: 4.53 ACRES \/" / APR/ 438-290-027 ZONING: RA !ARO USE: vAC*NT LAND S12E: 53.92 ACRES PROPOSED 17•430' HH FOR POWER & TELCO PROPOSED I'-0" LAVE 1 (1 EACH) SPRINT UIIIJTY EASEIVENI (E) UTILITY POLE /222128 (PROPOSED POWER & TELCO SOURCE) PROPOSED 200A NETER PEDESTAL (E) CHNNUNK FENCE PROPOSED U.G. RUN (1) 3' PVC CONDUIT FOR POWER (1) i' PVC CONDUIT FOR TELCO (3B1O') PROPOSED ZO'-0" W10E SPRN1 ACCESS/UTUTY EASEMENT APT./ 438-070-001 ZONING: RA LAND USE: vAGNT LAND SIZE: 17.65 ACRES (E) 20' 4110E DIRT ROAD (0) CHAINLINK FENCE PROPOSED 17'.30' NH FOR POWER k TELCO (1 EACH) PROPOSED SPRINT 915 EDUIPNENI ARN/ 438-070-005 ZONING: RA LAND USE: 5FR SIZE: 5.98 ACRES a PROPOSED SPRINT LEASE AREA 15'-0" . 495 Sr) 4/,(E) PROPERTY `(E) 38' DA WATER TANK PROPOSED 8'-0" MOE SPRINT UDUTY EASEMENT �JDyy ♦ T `(E) 20'-0 RIDE GTE \', PROPOSED EERCENCF GENERATOR PAWING ♦ APR/ 438-300-013: (E) 12' RIDE GTE ZONING: PA LAND USE: vACAT LAND SIZE: 4.02 ACRES . - • EI DIRT ACCESS ROAD \ (E) CUL OE SACS\ (E) PROPERTY LINE APR/ 438-070-003 MARC: RA LAND USE: vACANT LAND SIZE: 13.78 ACRES 4.4 \(E) CHAINUNK FENCE • r (E) ENO OF / PAVED READ \ ^(E) PROPERTY LINE • • UNE APR/ 438-300-001 ZONING: RA LAND uSE: RES. ACREAGE SIZE: 12.88 ACRES APR/ 438-300-002 ZONING: 8-1 LAND USE: vAGN1 LAND SIZE: 13.46 ACRES APR/ 438-300-012 ZONING: RA ONO USE: v*CANT LAND SIZE: 1.94 ACRES API/ 438-300-011 LAND USE: 5FR SIZE: 1.78 ACRES SOLE 11\1P4" 1•alOfY TOP 1 T. IlUST HE BENNOWi1ED ATEEFAST TWO R. TETRA (ECH. AND FULL OATS RPRIORS TOTATWES COMMENCE ENT OfTHE EP, CONSTRUCTION. 2. 00 NOT EXCAv4TE DR DISTURB BEYOND THE PROPERTY LINES OR LEASE LINES. uNLE55 OTHERMSE NOTED. 3. DO NOT SCALE BULGING DIMENSIONS FROM ORAMNLS. 4. ANY DRAIN AND/OR F1EL0 DLE ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETURNED TO ITS ORIGINAL CONDITION PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF WORK. SIZE. LOCATION AND TYPE OF ANY UNDERGROUND U1U11ES OR IMPROVEMENTS SHALL 6E ACCURATELY NOTED AND PLACED ON AS -MILT DRAWINGS BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ISSUED TO ARCHITECT/ENGINEER AT C011PLETION OF PROJECT. 5. ALL EXISTING uMItIES, fACIUTIES. CONDITIONS. ARO THEIR DEN51ON5 SHOW( ON PLANS HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS. THE ARCHTECT/ENGINEER AN0 OWNER ASSUME NO RESPONSIBILITY 'WHAI50EVER AS 10 THE SUFFICIENCY OR ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION WTION SHOWN ONINCN PLANS S OR THE WANNER OF THE IR [7901 1 OR A AN OF ALL CONTRACTOR 00 *14 BE RESPONSIBLE FOR O DETERMINING EXACT LOCATION OF µL EXISSUTILITIES AD FACILITIES H Uri TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. CGION 8CLR SHALL(10 *09 OBTAIN3SC 00L EACH METROurt COMPLHY 06 ADJUSTING TING EXISTING RELATIVE TO wOPKING SLHEDILLS AO METHODS OF REMOVING OR AOKISTING ExISTING UTILITIES. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL Ex15TIN0 uTIUTIES BON HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY PRICK TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES OR OOOBIS A5 TO THE INTERPRETATION OF PLANS 5M0uL0 BE INYEDIAIELY REPORTED TO ME ARCHITECT/ENGINEER FOR RESOLUTION AND INSTRUCTION. AND M FURTHER WORK SHALL BE PERFORATED UNHL ME OSCREPANCY IS CHECKED AND CORRECTED HT INC ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. FAILURE TO SECURE SUCH INSTRUCTION MEANS CONTRACTOR w1Ll HAVE BORNEO AT HIS/HER MN RISK AND EXPENSE. CONTRACTOR SHALL CAA. LOCAL DIGGER HOT UNE FOR UTILITY LOCATORS 48 HOURS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 7. ALL NEW AND EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES ON SITE AND IN AREAS TO BE DISTURBED 8Y CONSTRUCTION SHALL RE ADILSIED TO FINISH ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO FINAL IN5PECTION OF WORK. 8. THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT SWING ME BUILDING PERMIT SMALL BE NOT1Flm AT LOST 190 WORKING OATS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK 0R AS STIPULATED BY THE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL FANNING JURISDICTION. 9. GRADING OF THE SITE WORK AREA IS TO BE SMOOTH AND COMINUDUS IN AK nP 5 AL ME GRADING LIMITS. SLOPE AND IS TO FEARER INTO EXISTING D. ALL TELPORARY E:!CIVATONS FOR THE INSTALLATOH K FC'JHEA110.N5. UTILITIES. ETC.. SHALL 8E PROPERLY LAO BACK OR BRACED IN ACCORDANCE w1TH CORRECT OCCUPA00NAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (OSHA) REDUIREMENTS. IT. STRUCfuRAL FILLS SUPPORTING PAVENENIS SHALL SE COMPACTED TO T00% OF MAxmum StANOARD PROCTOR DRY DEN9tt. 12. NEW GRACES NOT IN BALDING AND DRIVEWAY IMPROVEMENT AREA TO BE ACHIEVED BY FILLING wall APPROVED CLEAN FILL ARO COMPACTED TO 95X CF STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. 13. ALL FILL 9451.E BE PLACED IN UNIFORM UM. THE LIFT TMCKNE55 SHOULD Not ExC EO THAT MOH � �CROPERLY COMPA0TEO THROUGHOLW RS ENTIRE DEPTH WITH THE Is. ANY FILLS PLACED ON EX15IINO SLOPES TUT ARE STEEPER THAN 10 HORIZONTAL l0 1 GE9TECRAALNNICN.. BE PROPERLY RLY BENCHED INTO THE EXISTING ELOPE A5 DIRECTED BY A 15. LHE CPES miMN NE FENCED -IN AREA ARE TO BE ACHIEVED BT COMPACTING CLEAN FILL TO A MAW OF 90% OF STANDARD PROCTOR. COVERING THE AREA WITH 6 MIL VISOUENE (1' OVERLAP AT SEAMS) FOR 8EE0 SUPPRESSION, MEN ACHIEVING FINISH GRADE BY 40ANO fi OF 3/4• CRUSHED STONE -NO FINES. 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAN ENTRE SITE AFTER CONSTRUCTION SUCH THAT NO PAER5, TRASH, WEEDS. BRUSH GR ANY OTHER DEPOSITS WILL REMAIN. ALL MATERIALS COLLECTED DURING CLEANNO OPERATORS SHALL BE OISPOSE0 OF OFF -SITE BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 17. 17. ALL FEES ARO SHRUBS WHICH ARE NOT IN DIRECT CONFLICT MTN THE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE PROTECTED Tr THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 18. DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION. GRADING AN0 DRAINAGE WORK SHALL CONFORM TO CALFDRNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRUISM -RATION STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION'. LATEST EDITIONS. AND ALL APPUCARLE PRDN510N5 DE LOCAL COUNTY ORDItWCES. 19. ALL SITE 9ORW SHALL BE CAREFULLY COORDINATED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR MN LOCAL UTILITY CONPMNY, TELEPHONE CDNPANY. AND AT.Y OTHER UTILITY CC4TPAN(E5 HA9NO JUR,50ICtICH OVER THIS LOCATOR. SCALE: 1 rY NONE 1 L Sprint PCS " 4683 CHABOT DRIVE. SUITE 100 PLEASANTON. CA 94588 =PROJECT INFORMATION. SAN JACINTO TANK RV37XC915G 1850 PARK AVENUE SAN JACINTO, CA. 92544 =CURRENT ISSUE DATE: 8/23/01 ISSUED CONSTRUCTION -REV.:=GATE:-ISSUED FOR: -BY: FOR: 4 8/23/01 100% CONSTRUCTION JOA 3 07/17/01 ACCESS RELOCATION JDA 2 11/27/00 907. CONSTRUCTION JDA 1 12/05/00 100% ZONING JDA 0 10/30/00 9000 ZONING LAR :---PLANS PREPARED Br lit TETRA TECH 3741 MERGED. SURE 0 RIVERSIDE. CA 9 503 (909) 352-4454 FAX (909) 352-4421 =CONSULTANT: CHIC:-APV.: [DRAWN BY: DRAWN BY: EA JDA LAR -LICENSURE: EXHIBIT B -SHEET TITLE' SITE PLAN CONSTRUCTION NOTES =SHEET NUMBER REVISION C 4 PG5PR5C178 1 CONSTRUCTION NOTES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S REPORT AND APPOINTING TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTEST TO THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2003-01 (AD 2003-1) PURSUANT TO THE BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1982 (AD 2003-1, ANNEXATION NO. 4) WHEREAS, the City Council pursuant to Resolution No. 2485, dated November 6, 2003, formed Assessment District No. 2003-1 (the "District") pursuant to the Benefit Assessment District Act of 1982 (the "Act") for the purpose of annually levying assessments on all land within the District to pay the costs of street, road and highway maintenance within said district; and WHEREAS, the City Council has initiated proceedings for the annexation of certain property to the District, pursuant to Resolution No. _ approved on September 2, 2004 (the "Resolution of Initiation"); and WHEREAS, as ordered by the City Council, David Taussig and Associates has prepared and filed with the City Clerk a report regarding the assessments to be levied and collected from the owners of such annexed property to pay the costs of streets, roads and highway maintenance. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to pass upon such report and appoint a time and place for hearing protests to the proposed annexation and the levy of assessments therein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED determined and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto: SECTION 1. Report. The report of David Taussig and Associates (the "Report") contains all matters required by the Act and is, therefore, in proper form and does not require modification. The Report is hereby adopted, passed upon and preliminarily approved. SECTION 2. Assessments. The assessments which are proposed to be levied on all parcels of assessable land within the territory to be annexed to the District are based on special benefits conferred upon each such parcel from the payment of the cost of the maintenance of streets, roads and highways. SECTION 3. Proportionate Benefit. The proportionate special benefit derived by each such parcel has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of such the maintenance of streets, roads and highways. The amount of the assessment shall not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. SECTION 4. Hearing. The public hearing for protest to the annexation of certain property described in the Resolution of Initiation and the levy of assessments therein in accordance with and for the purposes set forth in the Report is hereby set for 7:00 pm on October 7, 2004 at San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room, located at 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California. SECTION 5. Notice. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mail notice of the proposed annexation, filing of the Report, and the time and place of the public hearing, as specified in Section 4, to all persons owning real property proposed to be annexed whose names appear on the last equalized assessment roll for taxes of the County of Riverside, or who are known to the City Clerk. The form of such notice shall conform in all respects with the requirements of the Act and shall include an assessment ballot whereon the property owner may indicate his or her support or opposition to the proposed assessment. Upon the completion of the mailing of said notices, the City Clerk shall file with the City Council a declaration setting forth the time and manner of the compliance with the requirements of this resolution for mailing notices. APPROVED, PASSED and ADOPTED, this 16th day of September, 2004, by the following vote Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Absent: City of San Jacinto By Jim Ayres, Mayor Page 2 of 3 ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attomey, City of San Jacinto Best, Best & Krieger Page 3 of 3 ENGINEER'S REPORT ANNEXATION No. 4 TO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO September 7, 2004 ENGINEER'S REPORT ANNEXATION NO. 4 TO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 CITY OF SAN JACINTO Prepared for CITY OF SAN JACINTO 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 (909) 654-7337 Prepared by DAVID TAUSSIG & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1301 Dove Street, Suite 600 Newport Beach, CA 92660 (949) 955-1500 TABLE OF CONTENTS Part Pape Introduction 1 Part I: Description of the Services to be Financed 2 Part II: Description of Assessment District 3 Part III: Amount of the Prepared Assessment and Assessment Roll 4 Part IV: Basis and Schedule of Assessment 6 Exhibits A-1: Assessment Diagram A-2: Tentative Tract Map for Zone 11 B: Assessment Roll C: Detailed Cost Estimate: Zone 11 D: Cost of Services Summary E: Cash Flow Model: Zone 11 Page i INTRODUCTION In accordance with the Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, initiating the annexation of certain real property to Assessment District No. 2003-01 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District or AD No. 2003-1"), pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 (hereinafter referred to as the "Resolution of Initiation"), adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto (hereinafter referred to as the "Council"), in connection with the proceedings for Annexation No. 4 to Assessment No. 2003-1, David Taussig & Associates, Inc. herewith submits the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 4 to AD No. 2003-1 (the "Report"), consisting of four (4) parts as follows: PART I - DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES TO BE FINANCED A description of the street maintenance services to be provided by the Assessment District for Annexation No. 4 is discussed in this part. PART II - DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT A description of the property within each zone of benefit within Annexation No. 4 is contained in this part of the Report. PART III - AMOUNT OF THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AND ASSESSMENT ROLL This part includes the amount of the proposed assessment. PART IV - BASIS AND SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENT This part discusses the methodology used to allocate the assessment based on the benefit received by property within Annexation No. 4. Engineer's Report Page 1 City of San Jacinto Annexation No. 4 to Assessment District No. 2003-1 September 7, 2004 PART I. DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES TO BE FINANCED The Assessment District is intended to finance the costs associated with the maintenance of interior streets within the boundaries of Annexation No. 4, including street sweeping, slurry seal, grind and overlay of existing pavement, and replacement of damaged curb, sidewalk, and pavement. Each type of service is described below. Street Sweeping This service shall consist of cleaning the streets within Annexation No. 4 by City of San Jacinto ("City") forces or by contract with outside forces. The streets will be cleaned on a monthly basis, consistent with the current level of service for existing streets within the City limits. Slurry Seal This service shall consist of providing a slurry seal, or asphaltic coating over pavement areas within Annexation No. 4 on an average interval of four years. The service shall be performed by City forces or by public works contract, and shall include all required striping and traffic control associated with the work. Slurry seal operations will not occur in interval years where grind and overlay or replacement activities, as described below, are scheduled. Grind and Overlay This service shall consist of grinding out the upper 2 inches (approximately) of asphalt paving and replacing with a new layer of asphalt, on an average interval of twelve years. The service shall be performed by City forces or by public works contract, and shall include all required striping and traffic control associated with the work. Grinding and overlay operations shall not occur within interval years where Remove and Reconstruct operations, as described below, are scheduled. Remove and Reconstruct It is estimated that approximately every 36 years the asphaltic layer of the pavement structural section will need to be removed and replaced. In addition it is assumed that 10% of curb and sidewalk improvements will need to be repaired or replaced, due to normal damage and deterioration. This service shall consist of such removals and replacements and shall be performed by City forces or by public works contract, and shall include all required striping and traffic control associated with the work. Engineer's Report Page 2 City of San Jacinto Annexation No. 4 to Assessment District No. 2003-1 September 7, 2004 PART II. DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT For purposes of determining the benefits associated with the costs of services provided by the Assessment District, AnnexationNo. 4 has been divided into one zone of benefit ("Zone") based on location as described below and shown on the assessment diagram located in Exhibit A-1. Zone 11 Zone 11 consists solely of Tentative Tract No. 31037, Assessor Parcel Numbers ("APN") 431-030- 014, 431-030-032, and 431-030-033, and encompasses approximately 72.73 acres. There are 263 residential lots located in Tentative Tract No. 31037. A map of Tentative Tract No. 31037 is provided in Exhibit A-2. Engineer's Report Page 3 City of San Jacinto Annexation No. 4 to Assessment District No. 2003-1 September 7, 2004 PART III. AMOUNT OF THE PREPARED ASSESSMENT AND ASSESSMENT ROLL WHEREAS, the City Council pursuant to Resolution No. 2485, dated November 6, 2003, formed AD No. 2003-1 pursuant to the Benefit Assessment District Act of 1982 (the "Act") for the purpose of annually levying assessments on all land within the Assessment District to pay the costs of street, road and highway maintenance within said district; and WHEREAS, the City Council has now determined that certain property that will receive the benefit of such maintenance should be annexed to the Assessment District; and WHEREAS, on September 2, 2004, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, did, pursuant to the provisions of the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, adopt its Resolution of Initiation, for the purpose of annually levying assessments for the maintenance of streets, roads and highways within Annexation No. 4, and, WHEREAS, said Resolution of Initiation, as required by law, did direct the City Engineer to prepare or cause to be prepared and file a Report, regarding the proposed Annexation No. 4 to AD No. 2003- 1 and the assessments to be levied on the land therein to pay the estimated annual costs of the street, road and highway maintenance. For particulars, reference is made to the resolution forming AD No. 2003-1 and the Resolution of Initiation as previously adopted, and NOW, THEREFORE, David Taussig and Associates, Inc., at the direction of the City Engineer, pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982, does hereby submit the following: 1. Pursuant to the provisions of law and the Resolution of Initiation, the costs and expenses of the street maintenance to be performed in Annexation No. 4 to the Assessment District have been assessed upon the parcels of land in Annexation No. 4 to the Assessment District benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. 2. A diagram is attached in Exhibit A-1, showing Annexation No. 4 to the Assessment District, as well as the boundaries of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within said Annexation No. 4 to the Assessment District as the same existed at the time of the passage of said Resolution of Initiation, each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots respectively have been identified by Assessor Parcel Number upon said Diagram and in said Assessment Roll. 3. An Assessment Roll is attached in Exhibit B, containing the maximum assessment per lot for fiscal year 2004-2005. Notwithstanding the above, the City will not levy an assessment for services related to road facilities that have not been accepted for maintenance by the City. 4. By virtue of the authority contained in said Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 and by further Engineer's Report Page 4 City of San Jacinto Annexation No. 4 to Assessment District No. 2003-1 September 7, 2004 direction and order of the legislative body, the following assessment is hereby made to cover the costs and expenses of the street maintenance for Annexation No. 4 to the Assessment District based on the costs and expenses, as set forth in Part IV: Zone FY 2004-05 Total Annual Assessment No. of Residential Lots [1] FY 2004-05 Assessment per Residential Lot [1] 11 $51,137 263 $194.44 [1] If total number of lots within a Zone changes based on recordation of final maps, the total annual cost will be reallocated to the actual number of residential lots within such Zone. The maximum amount of such annual assessment for the Assessment District shall increase annually beginning July 1, 2005, by an amount equal to the percentage change in the Engineering News -Record Construction Cost Index for Los Angeles, measured as of the month of December in the calendar year which ends in the previous fiscal year, with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6.00%) and a minimum annual increase of zero percent (0.00%) of the amount in effect in the previous fiscal year. Engineer's Report Page 5 City of San Jacinto Annexation No. 4 to Assessment District No. 2003-1 September 7, 2004 PART W. BASIS AND SCHEDULE OF ASSESSMENT Assessments levied pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 must be based on the benefit to the parcel, which will be derived from the provision of the services. The services to be financed by the assessments levied within each Zone are the maintenance of interior streets within such Zone. Therefore, the services financed by a given Zone provide direct and special benefit to property within such Zone, Typically, identification of the benefits associated with maintenance services is the first step in developing the assessment spread methodology. The Assessment District will provide short term and long term maintenance of the streets within each Zone. The resulting benefits to the residential lots within each Zone consist of, but are not limited to: 1. Safe vehicular and pedestrian access; and 2. Clean and presentable streets and gutters. In order to allocate the assessments in proportion to the direct benefits that each parcel will receive from the services, an in-depth analysis was performed for each Zone since each Zone has its own interior street facilities. The analysis entailed three component tasks: (1) identification of service costs, (2) allocation of costs, and (3) calculation of assessments, as described below. Costs of Services Maintenance costs for each type of service were calculated for each Zone based on the paving area, length of curb, and area of sidewalk within such Zone as determined from available maps and improvement plans, and unit prices as discussed below. The City's current annual budget for street sweeping is approximately $36,000. This monthly service is provided to approximately 200 curb -miles, resulting in a unit cost of $180 per curb -mile per year. This unit price was applied to the total curb miles for the annexed Zone. Weighted average unit prices were applied to construction items such as slurry seal, asphalt paving, concrete curb, and concrete sidewalk based on data from recent projects of similar size within the same geographic area. Other items such as traffic control, striping, and mobilization were added as lump sum items to more closely approximate total bid prices. A summary of the cost estimates for the annexed Zone is provided in Exhibit C. Ten percent was added to the estimated maintenance costs for construction administration. An additional $21.65 per single family residential lot was added for annual administration of Annexation No. 4 to the Assessment District. The cost of services is summarized in Exhibit D. Allocation of Cost Zone 11 is expected to be developed with single family residential lots only, all of which receive similar benefit from the maintenance of interior street facilities within such zone. Therefore the cost of services for such Zone are allocated equally to each single family residential lot within the Zone. Engineer's Report Page 6 City of San Jacinto Annexation No. 4 to Assessment District No. 2003-1 September 7, 2004 Annual Assessment In order to determine the annual assessment for each Zone, a 36-year cash flow was prepared for Zone 11 (see Exhibit E). The cash flow sets forth the expected annual assessment revenue along with the projected annual cost for each type of service based on the costs identified in Part IV above and the service intervals described in Part I, assuming that the revenues and costs escalate by an average rate of 3.1% per year. As not all services are provided each year, the amount of funds required from a particular Zone will vary from year to year. The fiscal year 2004-05 annual assessment was calculated such that the annual assessment revenues in any year plus the expected fund balance remaining from previous annual assessments will provide sufficient revenue to fund the services required in any given year, assuming that revenues and costs escalate by an average rate of 3.1% per year. The following table sets forth the total fiscal year 2004-05 assessment for the annexed Zone as well as the fiscal year 2004-05 maximum assessment per residential lot. Schedule of Assessments Zone FY 2004-05 Total Annual Assessment [1] No. of Residential Lots [2] FY 2004-05 Assessment per Residential Lot [1, 2] 11 $51,137 263 $194.44 [1] Annual Assessments are subject to annual escalations between 0% and 6% per year. [2] If total number of tots within a Zone changes based on recordation of final maps, the total annual cost will be reallocated to the actual number of residential lots within such Zone. In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments for the above -referenced Assessment District have been spread in direct accordance with the benefits that each parcel receives from the street maintenance services. Engineer's Report Page 7 City of San Jacinto Annexation No. 4 to Assessment District No. 2003-1 September 7, 2004 Dated: September 7, 2004. David Taussig and Associates, Inc. Assessment Consultant City of San Jacinto County of Riverside State of California I, Dorothy Chouinard, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, California do hereby certify that the foregoing assessment, together with the Diagram attached thereto, was filed in my office on the 7th day of September, 2004. City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto County of Riverside State of California K:\Clienta2\San Jacinto\roadmaint\Annex No. 4\cngrptannex4. final.doc Engineer's Report Page 8 City of San Jacinto Annexation No. 4 to Assessment District No. 2003-1 September 7, 2004 EXHIBIT A-1 ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM SHEET 1 OF 2 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ANNEXATION NO. 4 TO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 CITY OF SAN JACINTO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Reference Is hereby made to that certain map entitled "Assessment Diagram, Assessment District No. 2003-1, City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of California," filed the 23nd day of December, 2003, at the hour of 8 o'clock a.m. in Book 55 at page 64, and as instrument number 2003-998200 in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, State of California, which this Annexation Diagram affects. I COTTONWOOD "1 1 ui s. vc 3 U EATON ST. SEVENTH J ST. ESPLAN.qfE AVE. AVE s. a FRUITVA E AVE i ti g VICINITY MAP Prepared by David Taussig & Assoc'ates, Inc. M a i• Filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto this _ day of , 2004. Dorothy L. Chouinard, San Jacinto City Clerk An assessment was levied by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the lots, pieces, and parcels of land shown on this assessment diagram. Said assessment was levied on the _th day of , 200_. Said assessment diagram and the assessment roll were recorded in the office of the City Clerk of San Jacinto on the day of 200_. Reference is made to the assessment roll recorded in the office of the San Jacinto City Clerk for the exact amount of each assessment levied against each parcel of land shown on this assessment diagram. Dorothy L. Chouinard, San Jacinto City Clerk Filed this _ day of , 2004, at the hour of o'clock _m, in Book of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at page and as Instrument No, in the office of the County Recorder of Riverside County, State of California. Gary L. Orso Assessor -County Clerk -Recorder of Riverside County By Deputy Fee Exempt recording requested, per CA Government Code §6103 SHEET 2 OF 2 Prepared by David Taussig & Associates, Inc. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ANNEXATION NO. 4 TO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 CITY OF SAN JACINTO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Reference is hereby made to the Assessor maps of the County of Riverside for a description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel. LEGEND MN IIM Zone 11 Boundaries of Annexation No. 4 to Assessment District No. 2003-1 San Jacinto, Riverside County, CA 431-030-0nn Assessor Parcel Number EXHIBIT A-2 ENGINEER'S REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR ZONE 11 O/NZR r Dar D111 Dana dIISSZOST DM r0111a ra 1*4 (rW-an/ IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 31037 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. At-ese-p14 01i 011 CROSS ACREAGE 12.761 DENSRF le W1a0 NUMBER OF LOfs r __.I 1100111011 Ips EELSTINO / PROPOSED ZONING F-Dt PROPOSED LAND USE DMOR111 ADJACENT LAND USE MIMI - am111w 04? - AlICODRall MT:AM` t PUBLIC UTILIf7L'S r - MOWS 01SDD01 r CO. AMMO - MOi1 CAROM 054* AL Mto • Cs tsar ro MKT ✓ r - FARM ter sans post 1rMa - water Coat - IDOIIY FLOOD ZONE se •r a 9• LEGAL DESCRIPTION PACS IIpONYIRr D6fYgDM 411R-Taal10 Of Tao os • s1 AS v1YDpIDIr 6*rwr sod Of MI ICI 11. or 11t 1Ym 0/ RK DID 11010 IYC r000•1101 A am 11 ■r i ID] II ODOR L rs *7 r 10•6 MOMS 01 DM sal ADM HIIOrq It FnnnF 1< Of Dip DTORMRT o001R110Y 11*- MODS 01 Dal 101 • Oa Mao. OIM M Mc0*mr tap r DM In1TO. MICA 1DO0r01L1O r-IO$ 0D Dal 101 II Ma IS Of roar 1R A. s Tl uses s tll W Ammo 111p r0Yr11 K Y 1M IT ma ar Mt ICES DOI at Of WI. =ICI 0fMDnaSD0 WOW. Ca/10044. Ia M 01 s WI Or IV M=MI DO mw110RY — F W 011 IYr Stal a D1s]b O IW4 R0Ml Or WI MOO t own, f(YORY • - ..� Be . 11 11 11 M .lY1Om10 BLAINE A. WOMER •" "10a CIVIL ENGINEERING Millie IMO BE V6 TES 1 y C'78 *"9a./ MA O rR NM ✓ I...onlIvaai a0111p10r TYPICAL STREET SECTION RAMONA BLVD ow N 11018 SCALE 1'• 105 CM OP BAN nano_ TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 3f037 AND Ot BAD lei 1 I — EXHIBIT B ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT ROLL David Taussig & Associates, Inc. Zone 11 City of San Jacinto Annexation No. 4 to Assesssment District No. 2003-1 FY 2004-05 Assessment Roll FY 2004-05 APN Tract Lot Assessment 431-030-014 31037 61 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 62 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 63 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 64 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 65 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 66 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 67 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 68 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 69 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 70 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 71 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 72 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 73 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 74 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 75 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 76 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 77 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 78 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 79 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 80 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 81 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 82 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 83 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 84 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 85 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 86 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 87 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 88 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 89 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 90 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 91 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 92 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 93 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 94 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 95 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 96 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 97 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 98 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 99 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 100 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 101 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 102 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 103 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 104 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 105 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 106 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 107 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 108 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 109 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 110 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 111 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 112 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 113 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 114 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 115 $194.44 Page 1 of 5 09/07/2004 David Taussig & Associates, Inc. City of San Jacinto Annexation No. 4 to Assesssment District No. 2003-1 FY 2004-05 Assessment Roll FY 2004-05 APN Tract Lot Assessment 431-030-014 31037 116 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 117 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 118 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 119 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 120 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 121 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 122 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 123 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 124 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 125 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 126 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 127 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 128 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 129 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 130 $194.44 431-030-014 31037 131 $194.44 Subtotal: S13,805.24 431-030-032 31037 01 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 02 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 03 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 04 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 05 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 06 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 07 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 08 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 09 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 10 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 11 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 12 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 13 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 14 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 15 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 16 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 17 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 18 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 19 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 20 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 21 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 22 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 23 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 211 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 212 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 213 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 214 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 215 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 216 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 217 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 218 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 219 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 220 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 221 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 222 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 223 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 224 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 225 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 226 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 227 $194.44 Page 2 of 5 09/07/2004 David Taussig & Associates, Inc. City of San Jacinto Annexation No. 4 to Assesssment District No. 2003-1 FY 2004-05 Assessment Roll FY 2004-05 APN Tract Lot Assessment 431-030-032 31037 228 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 229 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 230 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 231 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 232 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 233 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 234 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 235 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 236 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 237 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 238 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 239 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 240 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 241 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 242 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 243 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 244 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 245 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 246 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 247 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 248 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 249 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 250 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 251 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 252 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 253 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 254 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 255 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 256 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 257 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 258 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 259 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 260 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 261 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 262 $194.44 431-030-032 31037 263 $194.44 Subtotal: $14,777.44 431-030-033 31037 24 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 25 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 26 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 27 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 28 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 29 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 30 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 31 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 32 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 33 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 34 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 35 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 36 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 37 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 38 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 39 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 40 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 41 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 42 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 43 $194.44 Page 3 of 5 09/07/2004 David Taussig & Associates, Inc. City of San Jacinto Annexation No. 4 to Assesssment District No. 2003-1 FY 2004-05 Assessment Roll FY 2004-05 APN Tract Lot Assessment 431-030-033 31037 44 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 45 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 46 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 47 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 48 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 49 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 50 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 51 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 52 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 53 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 54 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 55 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 56 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 57 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 58 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 59 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 60 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 132 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 133 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 134 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 135 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 136 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 137 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 138 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 139 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 140 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 141 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 142 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 143 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 144 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 145 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 146 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 147 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 148 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 149 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 150 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 151 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 152 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 153 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 154 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 155 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 156 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 157 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 158 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 159 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 160 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 161 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 162 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 163 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 164 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 165 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 166 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 167 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 168 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 169 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 170 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 171 $194.44 Page 4 of 5 09/07/2004 David Taussig & Associates, Inc. City of San Jacinto Annexation No. 4 to Assesssment District No. 2003-1 FY 2004-05 Assessment Roll FY 2004-05 APN Tract Lot Assessment 431-030-033 31037 172 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 173 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 174 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 175 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 176 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 177 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 178 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 179 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 180 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 181 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 182 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 183 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 184 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 185 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 186 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 187 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 188 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 189 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 190 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 191 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 192 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 193 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 194 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 195 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 196 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 197 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 198 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 199 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 200 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 201 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 202 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 203 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 204 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 205 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 206 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 207 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 208 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 209 $194.44 431-030-033 31037 210 $194.44 Subtotal: $22,555.04 Total Assessment for Zone 11: $51,137.72 Total FY 2004-05 Assessment: $51,137.72 K:\Cliental\San Jacinto \roadmaint\Annex No. 41Assessment Roll.rpt Page 5 of 5 09/07/2004 EXHIBIT C ENGINEER'S REPORT DETAILED COST ESTIMATE : ZONE 11 David Taussig Associates, Inc. City of San Jacinto Detailed Cost Estimate Zone 11 Tentative Tract No. 31037 9/7/2004 Curb Length Curb - Miles Cost per Curb -Mile Annual Cost 'Street Sweeping 21,754 4.120 $180.00 $741.61 Quantity Units Unit Price Cost Slurry Seal: Mobilization 1 I.s. $5,000.00 $5,000 Place slurry seal 440,405 s.f. $0.10 $44,041 Crack Seal @ 20% of slurry seal cost - I.s. - $8,808 Striping 1 I.s. $20,000.00 $20,000 Traffic Control 1 I.s. $10,000.00 $10,000 otal .'bif /, Quantity Units Unit Price Cost Grind and Overlay Mobilization 1 I.s. $5,000.00 $5,000 Grind 440,405 s.f. $0.03 $13,212 0.15' asphaltic concrete paving overlay 4,955 tons $35.00 $173,409 Striping 1 I.s. $20,000.00 $20,000 Traffic Control 1 I.s. $10,000.00 $10,000 oral 57, Quantity Units Unit Price Cost Remove and Reconstruct Mobilization 1 I.s. $20,000.00 $20,000 Remove concrete curb © 10% of total quantity 2,175.40 11 $1.00 $2,175 Remove sidewalk @ 10% of total quantity 11,964.70 s.f. $0.15 $1,795 Grind 0.33' AC paving 440,405 s.f. $0.07 $29,507 construct 6" curb ©10% of total quantity 2,175.40 I.f. $7.60 $16,533 construct 6' wide sidewalk @ 10% of total quantity 11,964.70 s.f. $1.75 $20,938 construct 0.25' AC paving 8,257.59 tons $35.00 $289,016 Striping 1 I.s. $10,000.00 $10,000 Traffic control 1 I.s. $10,000.00 $10,000 otal $399, K:\Clients245an Jacintolroadmaint1Annex No. 44Exhibit C.xls]Sheetl EXHIBIT D ENGINEER'S REPORT COST OF SERVICES SUMMARY David Taussig & Associates, Inc. EXHIBIT D CITY OF SAN JACINTO COST OF SERVICES SUMMARY 09/0712004 Zone No. of Lots Curb -Miles Paving Area (SF) Street Sweeping Slurry Seal Grind and Overlay Remove & Reconstruct Construction Administration (10%) FY 2004-05 District Admin [2] 11 263 4.12 440,405 $742 $87,849 $221,622 $399,964 $3,881 $5,694 Total 263 4.12 440,405 $742 $87,849 $221,622 $399,964 $3,881 $5,694 [1 ] Refer to Exhibit C for details of the cost calculations. [2] An additional $21.65 per single family residential lot was added for annual administration of Annexation No. 4 to the Assessment District. K:1CIients21San Jacinto'roadmaint\Annex No. 41Exhibil D.123 EXIIIBIT E ENGINEER'S REPORT CASH FLOW MODEL : ZONE 11 David Taussig Associates, Inc. City of San Jacinto 9/7/2004 Street Maintenance Allocation' Zone 11 Tentative Tract No. 31037 Projected Annual Fund Balance Assessment Street Grind and Remove & Construction District Total Annual (Revenue Minus Year Revenue Sweeping Slurry Seal Overlay Reconstruct Administration Ad min Expenditure Costs) 1 $51,137 $742 2 $52,722 $765 3 $54,357 $788 4 $56,042 $813 $96,275 5 $57,779 $838 6 $59,570 $864 7 $61,417 $891 8 $63,321 $918 $108,780 9 $65,284 $947 10 $67,307 $976 11 $69,394 $1,006 12 $71,545 $1,038 13 $73,763 $1,070 14 $76,050 $1,103 15 $78,407 $1,137 16 $80,838 $1,172 $138,873 17 $83,344 $1,209 18 $85,928 $1,246 19 $88,591 $1,285 20 $91,338 $1,325 $156,910 21 $94,169 $1,366 22 $97,088 $1,408 23 $100,098 $1,452 24 $103,201 $1,497 25 $106,400 $1,543 26 $109,699 $1,591 27 $113,099 $1,640 28 $116,606 $1,691 $200,318 29 $120,220 $1,743 30 $123,947 $1,798 31 $127,790 $1,853 32 $131,751 $1,911 $226,337 33 $135,835 $1,970 34 $140,046 $2,031 35 $144,388 $2,094 36 $148,864 $2,159 $74 $1,775 $2,591 S48,546 $76 $1,830 $2,671 $98,597 $79 $1,887 $2,754 $150,200 $9,709 $1,945 $108,742 $97,500 $84 $2,006 $2,927 $152,352 886 $2,068 $3,018 $208,904 $89 $2,132 $3,112 $267,209 $10,970 $2,198 $122,866 $207,664 $95 $2,266 $3,307 $269,641 $98 $2,336 $3,410 $333,538 $101 $2,409 $3,516 $399,416 $310,069 $31,111 $2,483 $344,700 $126261 $107 $2,560 $3,737 $196,287 $110 $2,640 $3,853 $268,484 $114 $2,722 $3,972 $342,919 $14,005 $2,806 $156,855 $266,901 $121 $2,893 $4,222 $346,023 $125 $2,983 $4,353 $427,597 $128 $3,075 $4,488 $511,700 $15,823 $3,170 $177,229 $425,809 $137 $3,269 $4,771 $515,207 $141 $3,370 $4,919 $607,377 $145 $3,474 $5,071 $702,403 $447,262 $44,876 $3,582 $497,217 $308,388 $154 $3,693 $5,391 $409,397 $159 $3,808 $5,558 $513,538 $164 $3,926 $5,730 $620,908 $20,201 $4,047 $226,258 $511,256 $174 $4,173 $6,091 $625,385 $180 $4,302 $6,280 $743,053 $185 $4,436 $6,474 $864,368 $22,825 $4,573 $255,646 $740,473 $197 $4,715 $6,882 $869,427 $203 $4,861 $7,095 $1,002,378 $209 $5,012 $7,315 $1,139,450 $1,164,325 $118,648 $5,167 $1,288,299 $15 Totals $3,301,335 $47,877 $927,493 $757,331 $1,164,325 $289,703 $114,592 $3,301,320 Number of Single Family Residential Lots 263 Year 1 Cost per Residential Lot $194.44 [1] Assumes costs and annual as-:Pcsment revenue escalate at an average rate of 3.10%. K:ldknt 2 San JacNloWadmalMWnner No. 411Eohba EiblSaM1 AGENDA ITEM 5,1! September 16, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Community Development Director & City Attorney SUBJECT: Rural Standards RECOMMENDATION: By motion approve second reading and approve Ordinance No. 04-18 / regarding the amendment to Section 16.24.020 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code relating to the use of rural standards; and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City of San Jacinto, California, amending Section 16.24.020 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code relating to Improvement Standards BACKGROUND: The City is authorized to regulate the design and improvement of subdivisions occurring within the City. This authority includes the authority to regulate how public improvements that serve the subdivisions are designed. The City has adopted the County of Riverside's design standards, which include rural standards for items such as rolled curbs. In addition, other cities, such as Norco, have implemented more rural standards (such as limited street lighting and the absence of concrete sidewalks) in order to maintain a rural atmosphere within their cities. This ordinance was introduced at the August 19, 2004 City Council meeting. At that time, the Council expressed an intent to ensure that rural standards be compatible with other public improvements. In addition, the Council was concerned about the use of rural standards for collector roads. Therefore, the accompanying ordinance has removed the use of rural standards for collector roads. In addition, it expresses the City Council's intent that rural standards be compatible with existing and anticipated public improvements and authorizes the use of rural standards only when the public improvements are wholly located with the RAAB zone or a Rural -Residential General Plan area. Thus, a road that is on the boarder of an RAAB zone and partially located in another zone would be ineligible for the use of these rural standards. Page 1 of 2 RVPUB\JSB\677805.2 JUSTIFICATION: The Amendment to the Municipal Code is justified in order to encourage the rural development that is contemplated by the RAAB zone and Rural Residential land use designation. ATTACHMENT(S): • Ordinance No. 04-18 Page 2 of 2 RVPUBUSB1677805.2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) ORDINANCE NO. 04-18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 16.24.020 OF THE SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto ("City") is authorized by California Constitution, Article XI, Section 7 to make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other ordinances and regulations not in conflict with general laws; and WHEREAS, the City Council of San Jacinto ("City Council") has the authority pursuant to Government Code section 66411 to, by ordinance, regulate and control the initial design and improvement of subdivisions for which the Subdivision Map Act (Gov. Code, §§ 66410 et seq.) requires a tentative and final or parcel map; and WHEREAS, the City Council has previously adopted the Riverside County Road Improvement Standards and Specifications, which standards and specifications include improvement standards for public works within rural areas; and WHEREAS, the City's General Plan, Land Use Policy A(8) calls for the small -city character of San Jacinto to be maintained by encouraging a strong interface between new development and existing development; and WHEREAS, consistent with the City's General Plan, Land Use Policy A(8), the City of San Jacinto has established the Residential Agricultural Accessory Business (RAAB) zone within the City in order to encourage development that is compatible with a rural environment, including through minimum lot sizes of 20,000 feet; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires that the rural improvement standards (including those where, unless necessary, curbs, gutters and streetlights are discouraged) heretofore adopted by the City shall apply to the improvements associated with certain new divisions of land within the RAAB zone and to those within land designated as Rural -Residential in the City's General Plan; and WHEREAS, all other prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council hereby adopts the recitals of this Ordinance as true and Page 1 of 4 RVPUB\RMG\6775103 correct and such recitals are hereby incorporated by reference as though fully set forth in the text of this Ordinance. Section 2. Section 16.24.020 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 16.24.020 Standards. A. General. All improvements installed in land divisions, when such work is required by the city, shall be constructed in full conformance with the improvement standards and specifications of the city. B. Rural Standards. All improvements installed in land divisions resulting in residential lots of %2 acres or more and located either wholly within the RAAB zone or wholly within an area designated in the General Plan as Rural -Residential, when such work is required by the city, shall be constructed in full conformance with the following rural standards and specifications. The following rural standards and specifications shall properly interface with existing or anticipated public improvements and therefore shall only be used when the improvements are located wholly within the RAAB zone or an area designated in the General Plan as Rural - Residential. (1) Rural residential (local) roads shall be not less than twenty-four (24) feet in width, improved with asphalt concrete paving, designed and constructed in conformance with Riverside County Standard No. 138, as may be amended or supplemented. (2) Concrete rolled curbs in conformance with Standard No. 202, as may be amended or supplemented, shall be permitted in place of standard curbs upon the determination of the City that the streets are adequate to handle drainage. (3) Equestrian trail easements when deemed appropriate by the Planning Commission shall be utilized in accordance with Standard 405, as may be amended or supplemented. (4) Street lights shall be limited to the following locations, unless required elsewhere in order to protect the health and safety of the public or residents within the division: (i) intersections; (ii) pedestrian crosswalks; and Page 2 of 4 RVPUB\RMG1677510.3 (iii) at the end of cul-de-sacs. (5) Sidewalks shall not be required. (6) Residential driveways shall be installed per Riverside County Standard Nos 200 to 212, as may be amended or supplemented. (7) Water and sewer facilities shall be installed in conformance with current City standards. (8) Fire hydrants shall be installed in conformance with Fire Department requirements. (9) Drainage improvements and facilities shall be per City and Riverside County Flood Control Standards and adopted Master Plan. C. Absence of a Standard. In the absence of a standard for an improvement, the city engineer shall establish a standard in keeping with good construction engineering practices or adopt the standards as adopted by the county of Riverside. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days after its final passage. Section 4. The City Council hereby finds and determines that this Ordinance is exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (Cal. Pub. Resources Code, §§ 21000) and its implementing regulations because the Ordinance is not a "project" within the meaning of CEQA Regulations section 15378(b)(2) in that it is merely general policy or procedure making and because the Ordinance is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Regulations section 15061(b)(3) based on the fact that the Ordinance is within the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment and it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same or a summary thereof to be published in he County of Riverside, State of California. Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 19th day of August, 2004 by the following vote. Page 3 of 4 RVPUBIRMG1677510.3 Approved, passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 16th day of September, 2004, by the following vote: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Abstain: ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: John Brown, City Attorney Best Best & Krieger LLP City of San Jacinto by Jim Ayres, Mayor RVPUB\RMG1677510.3 Page 4 of 4 AGENDA ITEM 5, 1? September 16, 2004 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Peter A. Cosentini, City Manager SUBJECT: State of The City 2004 Event RECOMMENDATION: 1) Approve October 18, 2004 for the State of The City Event to be held at the Soboba Springs Royal Vista Country Club at 7:00 a.m., and 2) appropriate $2,000 from the General Fund Reserve to cover associated expenses. BACKGROUND: At the September 2, 2004 Council meeting, Council directed staff to come back with a date for the State of the City Event. This date was to be acquired after calling all Council Members. As of this writing, three members of the City Council had confirmed the October 18, 2004 date to be held at the Soboba Springs Royal Vista Country Club starting at 7:00 a.m. Breakfast to be catered; an admission cost for attendees will be established. We anticipate that the meal charge will cover the cost of the breakfast. JUSTIFICATION: Provide the community with an annual report of the City's programs, services, and efforts. City Manager: Finance Director: Approyttp BUDGETARY IMPACT: $2,000 appropriation from the City's General Fund Undesignated Funds. ATTACHMENTS: None AGENDA ITEM 6.1 September 16, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk' ti SUBJECT: Committee and/or Agency Agendas RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. BACKGROUND: Information per Council's request. JUSTIFICATION: None BUDGETARY IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Library RCTC RTA VEDC WROG Ap City Manager: .. Finance Director: Page 1 of 1 SEP-08-2004 10:09 AM P.02 San Jacinto Branch Library Submitted by Elise Malkowski, Branch Manager August 2004 Summer Reading has come to a close and we had a great time in the Wild, Wild West. There were a total of 229 children signed up for the Summer Reading program and 32 young adults participated as well. Our attendance for the programs went up tremendously with June attendance at 114 children and adults and July at 177 children and adults. We are looking forward to next years theme of Super Heroes. Thanks to the San Jacinto Friends group we now have a receipt printer that prints receipts to give to our patrons when checking out materials or paying fines. The receipt printer prints out the title of the item checked out and when it i.s due, or the date and amount of fine they paid. It is a nice enhancement to our library and we thank the Friends very much. We are still preparing for the Riverside County Library System Automation upgrade. Beginning October 14, 2004 the library will have a new system for looking up library material in the system and staff will checkout and process using the same new system. There are also a few more databases available to patrons via the library or from a home computer with Internet access, MI one needs is a Riverside County Network library card. The high school is back in session and staff are very busy. We have had geography classes come for a tour and English classes coming in to do research as well. We look forward to serving the students and their educational needs this coming year. We have a new part time library assistant. Her name is Rose Napoli and comes to us with much library experience from Orange County Public Library. She will be working evenings and rotating Saturday's. We continue to receive great donations from our community to add to our collection or put in the Friends book sale room. SEP-08-2004 10:09 AM P.03 Information on Riverside County Library's Upgraded Computer System Riverside County Library System will be upgrading its computer system. The current system has been in use since the mid-1980s and does not have the capacity to keep pace with the growth of our library system. The new system —to be known as the Inland Library Network —will offer all the same functionality of the old system (the Riverside County Network) with many new features and access to a much larger catalog of materials. Thanks in part to a grant from the California State Library, the Riverside County Library System, the San Bemardlno County Library, Moreno Valley Public Library, Murrieta Public Library, and College of the Desert Library will combine their library catalogs to bring you seamless access to several million items across the two -county region. You will be able to search the Inland Library Network catalog at any Riverside County Library site or from any computer with web access. You can use your Riverside County Library card at any Inland Library Network library, place requests for items held in any Inland Library Network library, and have that material sent to your local library. It's that simple! The new system is presently being installed. Installation will continue through the summer of 2004 and will be completed in the fall, Library staff will be trained to use the system during that time, Riverside Public Library Automation Plans Riverside Public Library will not be a participant in the Inland Library Network. Beginning in the summer of 2004, the Riverside Public Library will convert to its own stand-alone library automation network. County residents will continue to be able to use the Riverside Public Library main library and branches, but will need to have a new City Library card to check out materials. That card can be obtained free of charge at the Riverside Public Library main library or any City Library branch. City and County residents with older cards may need to obtain a new card. During the transition, materials owned by the City of Riverside may be displayed in the online catalog. As of May 1, these items may only be requested online at a City of Riverside branch. Online requests for City of Riverside materials originated at home or at any location other than a City of Riverside branch • will not be filled automatically. If you wish to borrow these items, please contact your local library staff about interlibrary loan. We regret any Inconvenience this may cause. 5 ■ VALLEY • ■ ECONOMIC • ■ ■ DEVELOPMENT • • ■ ■ CORPORATION ■■■i■- I ■■EE Buiiping; Opportunity BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING WEDNESDAY, JULY 21, 2004 @ 7:00 A.M. VEDC Offices, 800 E. Florida Ave., Ste A AGENDA CALL TO ORDER & INTRODUCTIONS: Chairman Wright APPROVAL OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES CORRESPONDENCE: Secretary Hippert FINANCIAL REPORT: Treasurer Christie EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT: Diane Wirth COMMENTS ACTION ITEMS 1. Committee Reports: a. Marketing — Lynda Poggenpohl i. Logo ii. Developer's meeting Website development b. Membership — Amelia Hippert c. Business Expo (Sept. 1) — Myrna Torres i. Outreach ii. Panelists / workshops d. Finance — Bobbie Christie i. Website Proposal Approval 2. Discussion: a. VEDC zip code coverage b. Strategic Plan Results 3. November quarterly VEDC event Closed Executive Session — Diane Wirth, 2nd Quarter Review NEW BUSINESS NAIOP ADJOURNMENT Valley Economic Development Corporation is a 501(c)6 and is a true public/private partnership. 800 E. Florida Ave., Suite A, Hemet, CA 92543 Tel: (909) 652-7688 ♦ Fax: (909) 652-7618 mir VALLEY ECONOMIC mom DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING WEDNESDAY, August 18, 2004 @ 7:00 A.M. VEDC Offices, 800 E. Florida Ave., Ste A AGENDA CALL TO ORDER & INTRODUCTIONS: Chairman Wright APPROVAL OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES CORRESPONDENCE: Secretary Hippert FINANCIAL REPORT: Treasurer Christie EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT: Diane Wirth COMMENTS ACTION ITEMS 1. Executive Committee a. In -Kind Contributions from investors 2. Discussion: a. Approval of Action Plans from Strategic Planning Session b. ICSC, Palm Springs — VEDC participation/representation 3. Committee Reports: a. Marketing — Lynda Poggenpohl i. Logo b. Membership — Amelia Hippert c. Business Expo (Sept. 1) — Myrna Torres d. Finance — Bobbie Christie 4. Update on Projects (Diane Wirth) a. GIS b. Website development c. Marketing materials d. Tradeshow booth e. Workforce/Commuter Skills Survey f. Lead development NEW BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT Valley Economic Development Corporation is a 501(c)6 and Is a true public/private partnership. 800 E. Florida Ave., Suite A, Hemet, CA 92543 Tel: (951) 652-7688 ♦ Fax: (951) 652-7618 !II VALLEY R■ ECONOMIC IN ■ ■ DEVELOPMENT i• ■ CORPORATION MERMEN Suil@In❑ Opportunity BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING WEDNESDAY, JUNE 23, 2004 @ 7:00 A.M. Dauma House, Diamond Valley Lake AGENDA CALL TO ORDER & INTRODUCTIONS: Chairman Wright APPROVAL OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES CORRESPONDENCE: Secretary Hippert FINANCIAL REPORT: Treasurer Christie EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT: Diane Wirth COMMENTS ACTION ITEMS 1. Committee Reports: a. Marketing — Lynda Poggenpohl b. Membership — Amelia Hippert c. Business Expo (Sept. 1) — Lynda Poggenpohl d. ByLaws - Bonnie Wright e. Finance — Bobbie Christie 2. Update: One -Stop Economic Development Center (old library) — Bonnie NEW BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT Valley Economic Development Corporation Is a 501(c)6 and Is a true public/private partnership. 800 E. Florida Ave., Suite A, Hemet, CA 92543 Tel: (909) 652-7688 ♦ Fax: (909) 652-7618 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL CONSERVATION AUTHORITY AGENDA Monday, September 13, 2004 1:00 p.m. Riverside County Administrative Center Board Hearing Room- First Floor Annex 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC COMMENT At this time members of the public may address the RCA Board of Directors regarding any items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board that are not separately listed on this agenda. Members of the public will have an opportunity to speak on agendized items at the time the item is called for discussion. NO action may be taken on items not listed on the agenda unless authorized by law. Any person wishing to address the Board on any matter, whether or not it appears on this agenda, is requested to complete a Request to Speak form available at the door. The completed form is to be submitted to the Secretary prior to an individual being heard. Whenever possible, lengthy testimony should be presented to the Board in writing and only pertinent points presented orally. 4. BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS 5. MINUTE APPROVAL — July 12, 2004 6. POLICY CALENDAR: 6.1 RCHCA/RCA MOU Concerning Cooperation in Habitat Conservation Planning and Management for the Long-term SKR HCP and the MSHCP (Carolyn Syms Luna) 6.2 Program Administrative Issues a. Calimesa/Lake Elsinore MOU Policy Issues (Michelle Ouellette) b. Monthly Revenue Report (Carolyn Syms Luna) c. Planning Directors' Technical Advisory Committee (Tony Carstens/Rick Bishop) d. Implementing Agreement Mechanisms (Michelle Ouellette) e. Participating Special Entities (Michelle Ouellette) RCA BOARD OF DIRECTORS AGENDA Page 2 of 2 September 13, 2004 6.3 Legislative Platform (Rick Bishop / Bill Hodge) 7. ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Members are invited to suggest additional items to be brought forward for discussion. 8. CLOSED SESSION: With respect to every item of business to be discussed in closed session pursuant to Government Code §§ 54956.9 There are no items to report. 9. ADJOURNMENT Meeting to be adjourned to October 4, 2004 at 1:00 p.m. Riverside County Administrative Center First Floor Annex — Board Hearing Room 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 WRCOG WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE NOTICE September 6, 2004 is a National holiday. The Executive Committee meeting for that day has been canceled. The next meeting of the Executive Committee is scheduled for Monday, October 4, 2004. J R C O C WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE NOTICE The Technical Advisory Committee meeting for August 19, 2004 has been canceled. The next meeting of the Technical Advisory Committee is scheduled for Thursday, September 16, 2004. REDEVELOPMENT OPERATIONS MANAGER STEVEN PASAROW AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 16, 2004, 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California ORGANIZATION 1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Invocation 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance 1.5 Special Presentations 1 5 1 Business Spotlight of the Month / Economic Development Specialist 1.5.2 Introduction of Fire Battalion Chief Robert (Bob) Michaels / Riverside County Fire Chief Greg Anthony . PUBLIC COMMENTS: Now is the time for the public to address the Council on any subject within the jurisdiction of the City Council not listed on the agenda. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the City Council. PUBLIC HEARING 3.1 Tentative Tract 31544 Zone Change 7-03 and Variance 03-04 to facilitate a residential development of 134 single-family lots located on the east side of the proposed SR 79 freeway and south of De Anza Drive / Community? Development Director 1.) Mitigated Negative Declaration with De Minimus Finding / Approve 2.); Ordinance No. 04-19 / An Ordinance approving Change of Zone 7-03, re -zoning 41.7.1 acres from Low Density Residential (LDR) to R-1 Residential / Approve and adopt introduction of Ordinance 04-19 and by further motion read by title only: City Council Agenda September 16, 2004 Page 2 of 4 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California Approving Change of Zone 7-03, Re -Zoning 41.71 Gross Acres on the East Side of the Proposed SR-79 Freeway and South of De Anza Drive from Low Density Residential (LDR) to R-1 Residential (R-1) 3.) Tentative Tract 31544 / Approve based on Planning Commission's recommendation 3.2 Resolution No. / A Resolution confirming assessment and order Road, street, and highway maintenance for the. Annexation of certain property into Assessment District (AD) No. 2003-1 Annexation 3 / Approve Resolution No. declaring the results of the assessment ballot tabulation, ordering the maintenance work therein and confirming the diagram and assessment / Special Tax Consultant and City Attorney CITY DEPARTMENTS CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by City. Council Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Mayor; state their name and address, and the consent calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes: 5.1 Warrants at 09/16/04 / Approve / Finance Director 5.2 Treasurer's Report at July 31, 2004 /Approve / Finance Director 5. 5.5 Regular Meeting Minutes September 2, 2004 / Approve / City Clerk Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Schedule of Events and Objectives and Policies for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 / Approve / Redevelopment Operations Manager Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) Grant spending plan Fiscal Year 2004 / Approve / Chief of Police 5.6 Proposed expenditure to establish a volunteer mounted posse unit for the San Jacinto Police Department / Approve appropriation of $3,055:44 to establish 20 member posse / Chief of Police City Council Agenda September 16, 2004 Page 3 of 4 5.7 Revised Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the San Jacinto Unified School District (SJUSD) and the San Jacinto Police Department / Approve / Chief of Police 5.8 Completion of installation of 230 street name signs / Approve and appropriate $26,400 from the General Fund Reserve authorizing hiring of two (2) full time temporary employees / Public Works Superintendent 5.9 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 8-04 / Ratify Planning Commission's. approval of CUP 9-04 based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval for a wireless telecommunication facility located on the eastern end of Park Hill / Community Development Director 5.10 Resolution No. / A Resolution approving the Engineer's Report and setting the Public Hearing for the annexation of certain property into Assessment District (AD) 2003-1 Annexation No. 4 / Approve and adopt / Special Tax Consultant and City Attorney 5.11 Ordinance No. 04-18 / An Ordinance amending Section 16.24.020 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code relating to the use of rural standards / Approve second reading and adopt / and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City of San Jacinto, California, amending Section 16.24.020 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code relating to Improvement Standards / Community Development Director & City Attorney 5.12 State of the City Event 2004 / Approve date, time, location -- October 18, 2004, 7:00 a.m., Soboba Springs Royal Vista Country Club / Appropriate $2000 from General Fund Reserve to cover associated expenses 1 City Manager MAYOR 1 COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS 6.1 Committee and / or Agency Agendas / Receive and File 1 City Clerk 6.2 Council Member Reports CLOSED SESSION None City Council Agenda September 16, 2004 Page 4of4 8. ADJOURNMENT If you challenge any action of the City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council (c/o the City Clerk) at, or prior to, the public hearing. CHALLENGE TO LAND USE DECISIONS: Any person seeking to challenge a decision regarding land use made by the City Council as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and the discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the City Council; shall be required to commence that action 90 days following the date on which the decision of the City Council becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Please refer to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes final. It is the intention of the City of San Jacinto to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner Please contact City Hall at (909) 487-7330, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. Orel° 54 -• da 444 as raed 4 taco. AGENDA ITEM September 16, 2004 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Steven G. Pasarow, Redevelopment Operations Manager SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Schedule of Events and Objectives and Policies for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 RECOMMENDATION: By motion approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Schedule of Events and Objectives and Policies for Fiscal Year 2005-2006. BACKGROUND: The City of San Jacinto receives an annual allocation of Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds through the Riverside County Economic Development Agency. For Fiscal Year 2004/2005, the City received $222,090. The City's upcoming allotment is yet to be determined. CDBG funds may be used public service activities, construction of infrastructure improvements, and programs such as housing, economic development, and code enforcement. The CDBG Program brings Federal dollars to local communities for the purpose of assisting low- and moderate income residents through public services, infrastructure improvements, economic development projects, and the elimination of blight. Funds are allocated based on population and the number of low- and moderate income households in each city. To be eligible for CDBG funding a program or project must meet one of three following national objectives: ■ Activities benefiting low and moderate income persons/households. ■ Activities which aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. ■ Activities designed to meet community development needs having a particular urgency. Programs and/or projects must also meet the eligibility requirements of the CDBG program. A maximum of 15% may be used on public service activities and 85% for projects and non- public service programs. Page 1 of 15 Ap s City Manager: Finance Director: The following programs/projects were awarded funding in FY2004/2005: ■ Valley -Wide Recreation $ 5,000 ■ Police Activities League $10,090 ■ Senior Home Repair Program $10,000 ■ City of San Jacinto, Neighborhood Clean Up $ 1,000 ■ San Jacinto Museum Relocation to Estudillo Mansion Project $50,000 ■ City of San Jacinto, Code Enforcement $146,000 Total: $222,090 To guide the program/project selection, an application booklet has been prepared and will be available to potential applicants. The booklet includes an overview of the CDBG Program, Objectives and Policies, a Schedule of Events, and Application. Objectives and Policies are new elements proposed for FY 2005/06. They identify the various categories of activities (objectives) that could be funded and how to prioritize programs and projects (policies). The City of San Jacinto has established the following Community Development Objectives and Policies in order to give maximum feasible priority to activities which will benefit low and moderate income residents. OBJECTIVES 1. Fair Housing Activities The promotion of housing choice and support of state and federal fair housing laws to ensure that all residents have access to a decent home in a suitable living environment in the City. Fair Housing services are funded through the Riverside County Economic Development Agency. 2. Capital Improvement Activities Acquisition, design, construction, and installation of needed public facilities and improvements located in CDBG income eligible target areas. Public facilities and improvements may include sidewalks, street improvements, storm drains, and water and sewer lines. 3. Health, Safety, and Public Welfare Eliminating conditions which are detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare through interim rehabilitation, code enforcement, etc. 4. Housing and Neighborhood Improvement Activities Improve the City's housing stock through rehabilitation of substandard units occupied by low and moderate income persons. Identify substandard and deteriorated housing stock that does not meet building, safety, or fire code requirements. 5. Public Service Activities Improving the quality and quantity of public services, principally for low and moderate income persons. 6. Historic Preservation Restoring and preserving properties formally designated as historic resources. POLICIES Policy 1 City projects, which benefit the City, will be given priority. Public improvements, such as sidewalks, streets, curb, and gutter can provide long term benefits to improve low and moderate income CDBG target areas. Other City sponsored programs, such as housing programs, code enforcement activities, and neighborhood clean-up also assist in the improvement of the community. Policy 2 Local service providers within the City of San Jacinto will be given funding priority when they are providing equivalent or the same services as those outside the City. Track record, experience, and years of operation may also be considered. Policy 3 Programs and projects, which have other funding sources, in addition to funds requested through the CDBG program, will be considered. It is important for projects/programs to sustain themselves should CDBG funding not be available in the future. Applications will be available on October 01, 2004 and due on November 01, 2004. Several public hearings will be scheduled to provide the public an opportunity to comment on the types of programs and projects to be considered and those proposed for selection. The Schedule of Events, in the application booklet, outlines when the meetings will be cond ucted. BUDGETARY IMPACT: The CDBG Program funding is received from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and awarded through the County of Riverside to the City of San Jacinto for the purposes of funding programs and projects that benefit low and moderate income persons. The City will need to provide funding for staff to administer the program. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A Application CITY OF SAN JACINTO FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION FORM This application form must be completed by all agencies or entities applying for Community Development Block Grant Funds from the City of San Jacinto. ALL QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED, AND REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION ATTACHED. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED FOR REVIEW. If additional space is required to complete the response, continue the answer on additional attached sheets, in sequence, and numbering the response. The City of San Jacinto estimates that it will receive $230,000 for the CDBG Program Year 2005-2006. Of that amount, 15% or approximately $34,500 will be available for Public Service activities, the balance of funds, approximately $195,500 will be available for Public Facilities projects. Funds will be made available for use after July 1, 2005. Should you require any assistance in completing the application, contact the City's representative at (951) 487-7320. You are encouraged to submit your application well before the deadline to allow ample time for review, completeness and accuracy. QUALIFYING CRITERIA In order to qualify for funding, eligible projects must meet one of the following criteria: 1. The activity predominantly benefits low and moderate -income persons (more than 51 % of persons participating in your project or activity will be benefiting). 2. The activity will eliminate slums or blight. 3. The project will meet a need having a particular urgency. (The condition of urgency must be of recent origin, generally being developed or critical less than 18 months preceding the application for assistance.) TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FUNDING, YOU MUST SUBMIT AN ORIGINAL SIGNED APPLICATION WITH ATTACHMENTS AND TWO COPIES WITH ATTACHMENTS, FOR A TOTAL OF THREE, TO THE OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOT LATER THAN 4:00 P.M. NOVEMBER 01, 2003. City of San Jacinto Community Development Department Attn: Redevelopment Operations Manager 248 East Main Street, San Jacinto, CA 92583 The City of San Jacinto will hold Public Hearings on November 18, 2004 and December 02, 2004 to determine which projects and activities shall receive funding for the 2005-2006 CDBG Program Year. All projects, programs and activities approved on those dates will be forwarded to the County of Riverside for review and approval. The County of Riverside has been designated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as an Urban County. Each year the County or Riverside applies for federal Community Development Block Grant funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development as an Urban County to meet the housing, economic and community development needs of the county and its cooperating cities. These funds are distributed to the unincorporated Supervisorial district communities and the cooperating cities based on a formula which calculates population, poverty and substandard housing needs. This application form is to be used by potential sponsors who are submitting application requests which will primarily benefit residents of the incorporated City of San Jacinto. If your proposed activity provides a primary benefit to any of the following cooperating cities, you should contact that city for application requirements and make a direct application to that city: COOPERATING CITIES CITY CONTACT PHONE NO. Banning Paul Toor (951) 922-3130 Public Works Director Beaumont Dave Dillon (951) 769-8520 EDA Director Blythe Robert Casais (760) 922-6130 Development Services Director Calimesa Shaina Haywood (951) 795-9801 Finance Director Canyon Lake Delbert "Del" Powers (951) 244-2955 City Manager Cathedral City Tony Barton, Park & Rec. Manager (760) 770-0380 Parks & Recreation Desert Hot Springs Author Davis (760) 329-6411 Planning Tech x224 Indio Gary Werner Dir. Dev. Services (760) 342-6541 Lake Elsinore Dave Sapp (951) 673-3124 Community Services Director La Quinta Jerry Herman (760) 777-7000 Community Development Director Murrieta Jim Miller (951) 698-1040 Community Development Director x6077 San Jacinto Deborah De Grado (951) 582-5540 Public Information Officer Palm Desert Luis Espinoza (760) 346-0611 Finance Oper. Manager Perris Michael Morales (951) 943-5003 Planning & Community Development San Jacinto Steven G. Pasarow (951) 487-7330 Temecula Redevelopment Operations Manager Gus Papgolos Senior Management Analyst (951) 694-6430 This application shall be utilized for City of San Jacinto's CDBG Program funding requests only. For more information on the County of Riverside's CDBG Program for unincorporated communities please contact: Economic Development Agency County of Riverside P.O. Box 1180 3525 14th Street Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 955-8916 PROPOSAL No. Date Rec'd CITY OF SAN JACINTO 2005-2006 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION FORM I. GENERAL INFORMATION: Name of Primary Activity Sponsor: Mailing Address: Zip Code: Telephone Number: ( ) Contact Person: Title: Address (If different from above): Amount of CDBG Funds Requested: $ Where will the activity occur and what is the geographic scale of the proposed activity (community, city, region), be specific? In which Supervisorial District does your activity occur? II. ORGANIZATIONAL HISTORY: (This is applicable only if you are a non-profit organization). Please provide a list of your current Board of Directors (Label as Attachment II). Date Organization founded: Date Organization incorporated as a non-profit organization: Number of volunteers: Number of paid staff: Federal identification number: State identification number: Attach: Tax Exempt Status Documentation Attach: ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BY-LAWS (Label as Attachment IIA) III. PROJECT ACTIVITY: (check the applicable category your application represents) _ Real Property Acquisition _ Public Service Housing _ Capital Equipment (Fixed) _ Rehabilitation/Preservation (please provide picture of structure) _ Public Facilities Improvements (construction) Other: Please Describe Activity: Use additional sheets if necessary IV. PROJECT NARRATIVE: A. Name of Project: Specific Location: 1. Provide a detailed description of the proposed project or activity by describing in quantifiable terms precisely what will be accomplished with the requested funds (attach additional sheets if necessary) 2. What are the goals and objectives of the project or activity? (attach additional sheets if necessary) 3. Discuss this project's or activity's benefit to the low and moderate income population to be served by this project or activity: 4. If this is a public service activity: (A) Is this a NEW service provided by your agency? Yes_ No_. (B) If this service is not new, will the proposed activity substantially increase the existing level of service? Yes No Explain how the service will be substantially increased. (attach additional sheets if necessary) 5. What methods will be used for community involvement to assure that all who might benefit from the project are provided an opportunity to participate? 6. What are this project's or activity's expected results? 7. How many persons are expected to be served? 8. How will you measure and evaluate how the project or activity meets its goals and objectives? [measures should be both qualitative and quantitative] 9. What evidence is there of long-term commitment to the proposal? Describe how you plan to continue the work (project or activity) after the grant ends? 10. Attach maps of proposed project(s) location(s) and service area(s). V. PROJECT BENEFIT: To be eligible for CDBG funding, a project or activity must qualify within one of the three following categories. Indicate how the project or activity in this application meets one of the following categories of benefits. Indicate the source of the information provided. (Provide information for the one category your application applies to.) CATEGORY 1. Benefit to low -moderate income persons (must be documented). Please identify how you have documented the persons served are low -moderate income persons by providing information in either A, B, or C. A. Area Benefit: The project serves persons in the identified block groups in Census Tract which are 51 % or more low/moderate income. Check One: 1990 Census Data; 2000 Census Data: Census Tract and block group numbers: CT BG CT BG CT BG CT BG CT BG CT BG # Total population in Census Tract(s) / block group(s) # Total low -moderate population in Census Tract(s) / block group(s) B. Limited Clientele: The project serves clientele that have documented their income. Identify the procedure you currently have in place to document that the clientele you serve are low -moderate income persons. C. Clientele presumed to be principally low- and moderate -income persons. The following groups are presumed by HUD to meet this criterion: Abused children, battered spouses, elderly persons, severely disabled adults, homeless persons, illiterate adults, person's living with AIDS, and migrant farm workers. Describe your clientele to be served by the activity. CATEGORY 2. Prevention or Elimination of Slums and Blight: Is the project located in a Redevelopment Area? Yes No. If yes, attach map of area. Additionally, provide the Redevelopment Project Area Report (excerpts accepted) which documents the existence of slum/blight. Also document the specific redevelopment objectives pertaining to the proposed project. CATEGORY 3. Documented Health or Safety Condition of Particular Urgency: Condition shall have been of recent (18 months) origin. Provide documentation which demonstrates the health or safety condition has existed only within the previous 18 months. VI. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: A. Complete the following annual budget to begin on July I of this year. If these line items are not applicable to your activity or project, please attach an appropriate budget. Provide total Budget information and distribution of CDBG funds in the proposed budget. TOTAL BUDGET CDBG FUNDS BUDGET SUMMARY Include CDBG Funds) REQUESTED I. Personnel A. Salaries & Wages $ $ B. Fringe Benefits $ $ C. Consultants & Contract $ $ Services $ $ SUB -TOTAL $ $ II. Non -Personnel A. Space Costs $ $ B. Rental, Lease or Purchase of Equipment $ $ C. Consumable Supplies $ $ D. Travel $ $ E. Telephone $ $ F. Other Costs $ $ SUB -TOTAL $ $ III. Architectural/Engineering Design $ $ IV. Acquisition of Real Property $ $ V. Construction/Rehabilitation $ $ TOTAL: $ $ B. Identify other funding sources; identify commitments or applications for funds from other sources to implement this project or activity. Attach evidence of commitment. Funding Source Amount Requested Date Available Type of Commitment C. Provide a summary by line item of your Agency's previous years' income and expense statement. (Use additional sheets if necessary) D. If this project benefits citizens of more than one community or local jurisdictions and/or municipalities, have requests been made to those other jurisdictions? Yes _ No If yes, identify sources and indicate outcome In no, please explain E. Was this project previously funded with CDBG funds? If yes, when? Is this activity a continuation of a previously funded (CDBG) project? (explain) VII. MANAGEMENT INFORMATION: (PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION BY ATTACHMENT). A. Describe the organization responsible for managing and operating the project including: previous similar experience, list source, and commitment of funds for operation and maintenance. Identify project manager, or person in charge of the project's day-to-day operations. B. What is the role of your organization in the community? C. Timetable for Project Implementation. Indicate primary project objectives: (You may attach a time chart, if you wish). OBJECTIVE OR MILESTONE START DATE COMPLETION DATE D. If you have never received CDBG funding from Riverside County or its participating cities, provide the following regarding any previous experience with other federally funded programs. Source Activity Year Funds Received Amt. VIII. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: Every project proposal MUST contain evidence of citizen participation and support for the proposal. That evidence must include documentation of at least one community meeting this year at which the specific project was discussed and opportunity given for citizen input. Describe the methods used to obtain citizen involvement and attach appropriate documentation. IX. PLANNING: Identify the most applicable adopted plans or strategies (if any) which the proposed project will help implement: APPLICATION CERTIFICATION Undersigned hereby certifies that: 1. The information contained in the project application is complete and accurate. 2. The applicant shall comply with all Federal and County policies and requirements affecting the CDBG program. 3. The federal assistance made available through the CDBG program funding is not being utilized to substantially reduce the prior levels of local financial support for community development activities. 4. The applicant shall maintain and operate the facility for its approved use throughout its economic life. Sufficient funds are available to complete the project as described, if CDBG funds are approved. 6. I have obtained authorization to submit this application for CDBG funding. (DOCUMENTATION ATTACHED). Type Name of Authorized Representative: Signature of Authorized Representative: Date: The following are attached to this application: Yes No 1) Map of area served 2) Management Information 3) Organizational history (Non -Profits only) 3a Articles of Incorporation/Proof of Non -Profit Status (e.g. I.R.S. 501C3 letter) 3b Current Board of Directors 4) Income and Expense Statement CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM SCHEDULE OF EVENTS FY 2005-2006 City Council Approves Application Package Sept. 16, 2004 Applications Available to the Public Oct. 01, 2004 Completed Applications Due to City of San Jacinto Nov. 01, 2004 (11:00 A. M.) Staff/Committee Review of Submitted Applications Nov. 02-05, 2004 First Public Hearing Nov. 18, 2004 Second Public Hearing Dec. 02, 2004 City Submits Approved Applications to County of Riverside Dec. 10, 2004 County of Riverside Board of Supervisors Review Mar. 2005 (estimate) County of Riverside Approves Applications May 2005 (estimate) FY 2005-2006 Program Year Begins July 01, 2005 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING of the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO SEPTEMBER 16, 2004 Immediately Following the Regular City Council Meeting San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call PUBLIC COMMENTS None PUBLIC HEARING: Now is the time for the public to address the Agency on any subject not listed on the agenda. Any person may address the Agency on any subject pertaining to Redevelopment Agency business not listed on the Agenda during this portion of the Meeting. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the Agency Directors. CITY DEPARTMENTS CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by Agency Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the Redevelopment Agency, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Agency Chairman; state their name, address and the consent calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. 5.1 August 19, 2004 Regular Meeting Minutes / Approve / Agency Secretary Redevelopment Agency Agenda September 16, 2004 Page 2 of 2 5.2 September 2, 2004 Regular Meeting Minutes / Approve / Agency Secretary CHAIRPERSON / MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS None 7. OPEN SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS CLOSED SESSION 8. ADJOURNMENT evtorky4. ate, Sea eta, a4 tie Sao pazz'ata 'edeuela se st r49eac y, do ee tlsat 1 caa ed to de rite 03e9O 9 a9eada rise 10t4 dart' SLieHs6en, 2004, a4 ae ethred eiy lain. AGENDA REGULAR MEETING of the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO SEPTEMBER 16, 2004 Immediately Following the Regular City Council Meeting San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 CaII to Order 1.2 Roll CaII 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS None 3. PUBLIC HEARING: Now is the time for the public to address the Agency on any subject not listed on the agenda. Any person may address the Agency on any subject pertaining to Redevelopment Agency business not listed on the Agenda during this portion of the Meeting. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the Agency Directors. 4. CITY DEPARTMENTS 5. CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by Agency Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the Redevelopment Agency, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Agency Chairman; state their name, address and the consent calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. 5.1 August 19, 2004 Regular Meeting Minutes / Approve / Agency Secretary Redevelopment Agency Agenda September 16, 2004 Page 2 of 2 5.2 September 2, 2004 Regular Meeting Minutes / Approve / Agency Secretary 6. CHAIRPERSON / MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS None 7. OPEN SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS CLOSED SESSION 8. ADJOURNMENT 9, Donotluy Z. elwuurand. Serizeta'uy 4 t%ce Seca 9acucta rRedeue€o/uueat /fyeocey. do 4enedey cec* duct 9 canoed to de /tooted toe Pne9o419 ageocda toe FOt4 day o6 Se/ate were. 2004. as aeguvred 4 Qacu. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING of the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO AUGUST 19, 2004 - 10:42 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 CaII to Order 1.2 Roll Call Present: Jim Ayres, Chris Carlson-Buydos, Jim Conner, Ken Shaw Absent: Dale Stubblefield 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS None 3. PUBLIC HEARING: None 4. CITY DEPARTMENTS None 5. CONSENT CALENDAR 5.1 August 5, 2004 Regular Meeting Minutes / Approve / Agency Secretary M/S/C (Ayres / Conner) moved to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried 2/0. Ayes: Conner, Ayres Nays: None Absent: None Redevelopment Agency Minutes August 19, 2004 Page 2 of 2 Abstain: Carlson-Buydos, Shaw (absent 8/5/04 meeting) 6. CHAIRPERSON / MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS None Chairman Ayres recessed the RDA meeting at 10:43 p.m. and reconvened the RDA meeting for Closed Session at 10:59 p.m. 7. OPEN SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS California Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 439-110-093 Agency Negotiator: Peter A. Cosentini, RDA Executive Director Negotiating Parties: Joe Meyer doing business as San Jacinto LLC Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment No reportable action. 8. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Ayres adjourned the meeting at 11:14 p.m. ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, Agency Secretary Page 2 of 2 San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency by Jim Ayres, Chairman MINUTES EN OA 5;a REGULAR MEETING of the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO SEPTEMBER 2, 2004 — 8:34 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call Present: Ayres, Carlson-Buydos, Conner Shaw Absent: Stubblefield 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS None 3. PUBLIC HEARING: None 4. CITY DEPARTMENTS 4.1 Request for Proposals Redevelopment Relocation Plan Update / Approve / Redevelopment Operations Manager In Steven Pasarow's absence Community Development Director Tim Hults gave the Staff report. M/S/C (Carlson-Buydos / Ayres) moved to approve and authorize staff to advertise for bids per the Request for Proposal for an Update to the City's Redevelopment Project Area Relocation Plan. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Carlson-Buydos, Conner, Shaw, Stubblefield Nays: None Absent: Stubblefield Redevelopment Agency Minutes September 2, 2004 Page 2 of 2 Abstain: None 5. CONSENT CALENDAR 5.1 August 19, 2004 Regular Meeting Minutes / Approve / Agency Secretary Agency Secretary Chouinard pulled and asked that this item be continued until the September 16, 2004 meeting. The Board of Directors unanimously concurred. 6. CHAIRPERSON / MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS None 7. OPEN SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS CLOSED SESSION None 8. ADJOURNMENT Director Ayres adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m. San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency by Jim Ayres, Chairman ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, Agency Secretary Approved as read: Approved as amended: MINUTES REGULAR MEETING of the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO SEPTEMBER 16, 2004, 8:16 p.m San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order Vice Chairperson Chris Carlson-Buydos called the Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency to order at 8:16 p.m. 2 Roll Call Present: Chris Carlson-Buydos Jim Conner, Ken Sha Absent: Jim Ayres, Dale Stubblefield PUBLIC COMMENTS None PUBLIC HEARING: Now is the time for the public to address the Agency on any subject not listed on the agenda. Any person may address the Agency on any subject pertaining to Redevelopment Agency business not listed on the Agenda during this portion of the Meeting. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for; each person desiring to address the Agency Directors. CITY DEPARTMENTS None CONSENT CALENDAR 5.1 August 19, 2004 Regular Meeting Minutes / Approve / Agency Secreter Redevelopment Agency Agenda September 16, 2004 Page 2 of 2 5.2 September 2, 2004 Regular Meeting Minutes/ Approve / Agency Secretary M/S/C (Conner / Shaw) moved to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried 3/0. Ayes: Conner, Shaw, Carlson-Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 6. CHAIRPERSON / MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS None 7. OPEN SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS CLOSED SESSION None 8. ADJOURNMENT With no further business before the Redevelopment Agency, Vice Chairperson Carlson-Buydos adjourned the meeting at 8:17 p.m. ATTEST: City of San Jacinto by Jim Ayres, Mayor Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk Approved as read Approved as amended