Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 2/5/1991
6K5 /1A/e ( 7y� SY s AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO AND THE COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 625 South Pico, San Jacinto DATE: February 5, 1991 TIME: 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Boykin, Ford, Hafliger, Leahy, Rose MOMENT OF SILENCE FOR REFLECTION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CITY COUNCIL AGENCY I. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion by the City Council in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these unless members of the City Council, staff specified items to be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar upon invitation of the Mayor, state their name, Calendar item number. A. Approval of Minutes of January 22, 1991. B. Approval of Warrant Nos. 24207 through 24357, as submitted by the Finance Director. C. Treasurer's Report of Time Deposit Registers for January 31, 1990. (Receive and file.) items prior to the motion or the public requests item should come forward, address, and the Consent D. Authorization for Staff to execute Memorandum of Understanding between the City of San Jacinto and the San Jacinto Police Officers Association. (Staff recommends approval.) E. Ordinance for Adoption - Ordinance No. 927 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Change of Zone 23-90 amencing Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto. (Planning Commission recommends approval.) F. Claim for damages from John Kennedy Kesselmark. (City Attorney recommends denial.) 2-5-91 Agenda Page 2 II. CONSENT CALENDAR (cont'd) G. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1930 Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, ordering foreclosure actions authorizing hiring of special counsel. (City Attorney recommends approval.) H. Award of Bid to Weathertight Roofing Co. to re -roof the Police Department facility (not to include the modulars) at a cost not to exceed $4,670.00. (Staff recommends approval.) I. Acceptance of Road Deed for right of way along Main Street from Allen and Patricia Marie Cunningham. (Staff recommends acceptance.) ✓ ✓ J. Award of Contract to Kleinfelder, Inc. for consulting services and preparation of required SRRE and HHWE of AB 939 in the amount of $42,000 with an additional 15% contingency. (Staff recommends approval.) K. CFD #2 - Purchase of Park Hill Tank Site from Paragon Homes and proposal for Enginering Services to design Tank and Appurtenances from NBS/Lowry. (Staff recommends Mayor be authorized to execute the offer to purchase, as submitted, and the City Manager be authorized to execute the contract with NBS/Lowry for design services in an amount not to exceed $84,500.) L Change Order - CFD #2 Approval of Change Order No. 5 - street improvements Matich Corporation (Staff recommends approval.) M. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda pursuant to City Attorney. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to approve consent calendar items A through M, adopting Resolution No. 1930 and Ordinance No. 927 waive the readings in full. Vote: PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 17th Year Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds 2-5-91 Agenda Page 3 PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont'd) B. Environmental Impact Assessment and Change of Zone 25-90 Applicant: Rymco Framing Location: northwest corner of Evans Street and Las Rosas Drive A proposal for Change of Zone from A, Agricultural to R- 1, Single Family on approximately 1.04 acres. (Planning Commission recommends approval.) Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 928 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California approving Change of Zone 25-90 amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto. Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to introduce Ordinance No. 928 to second reading, subject to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration and waive the reading in full. Vote: C. Environmental Impact Assessment and Change of Zone 1-91 Applicant: Pres Ilog Location: between Ramona Blvd and DeAnza Drive, approximately 2,000 feet northwest of Young Street. A proposal for Change of Zone from A, Agricultural to R- 1, Single Family on approximately 9.5 acres. (Planning Commission recommends approval.) Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 929 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Change of Zone 1-91 amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto. Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to introduce Ordinance No. 929 to second reading, subject to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration and waive the reading in full. Vote: III. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS A. Christian Rally at Drudin Park - Rose Marie Romero B. Community Awareness Rally - Mistletoe Park - Albert Gonzales C. Yellow Ribbon Proclamation - B.R. Hicks, President, San Jacinto Chamber 2-5-91 Agenda Page 4 IV. CITY DEPARTMENTS A. Update on The Villas Water Issue - John Townsel (including presentation by the Keith Company) B. Update on Soboba Springs Mobile Home Park Letter City Manager Easter C. Update on Claim of Sal Cervantes (continued from 1-22-91) - Richard Vryheid V. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REP:7!RTS/COMMENTS A. Scripps Clinic - Henry Hafliger B. Bonding of City Treasurer -,Janet Leahy "c(-1615-(c,1 ") VI. EXECUTIVE SESSION -ad-i-n-ij- Litigation Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to go into Executive Session for pending litigation. Vote: Time: Motion by: Seconded by: to Regular Session. Vote: Time: VII. ADJOURNMENT Action: to return Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to adjourn to February 15, 1991 at 2:00 p.m. for City Council/City Manager Retreat in San Bernardino. Vote: Meeting adjourned at p.m. Next regular City Council meeting February 19, 1991. M O R : U M 0 F U N D E R S T A BETWEEN CITY OF SAN JACINTO� CA li D SAN JACINTO POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION I PI G This Memorandum of Understanding (hereinafter "MOU") is entered into between the City of San Jacinto (hereinafter "City") and the San Jacinto Police Officers Association (hereinafter "Association") pursuant to the provisions of the Myers-Millias-Brown Act. This MOU shall be effective for the period from July 1st 1990, up to and including June 30th 1991; and thereafter shall continue in effect year -by -year unless one of the parties notifies the other in writing no later than March 15th 1991, of the request to modify, amend or tei,uinate the Memorandum of Understanding. ARTICLE I Recognition 1.1 The City recognizes Association as the bargaining agent for all employees of the Police Department employed by the City, except management, confidential, temporary and part-time employees. ARTICLE II Management Rights 2.1 It is understood and agreed that the City retains all of its powers and authority to direct, manage and control to the full extent of the law. Included in but not limited to those duties and powers are the exclusive right to: determine its organization; direct the work of its employees; assign work not expressly covered by job description, deteiniine the times and hours of operation; determine normal working hours and to schedule shifts accordingly; determine the kinds and level of services to be provided, and the methods of providing them; establish its municipal policies, goals, and objectives; make technological improvements; determine staffing patterns; determine the number and kinds of personnel required; maintain the efficiency of City operations, build move or modify facilities; establish budget procedures and determine budgetary allocations; determine the methods of raising revenue; contract out work in accordance with law; determine the procedures and standards of selection for employment and promotions; establish and enforce dress and grooming standards, determine the content and intent of job classifications; determine style and/or types of City issued wearing apparel, equipment or technology to be used; establish and modify productivity and performance programs and standards; establish employee performance standards including, but not limited to quality and quantity standards and to require compliance here -with and to take any action necessary to meet conditions of any emergency nature, provided that the Association shall be afforded the opportunity to meet and confer concerning the necessity of any such action if inconsistent with this MOU. In addition, the City retains the right to hire, classify, assign, evaluate, promote, terminate, transfer and discipline employees. 2.2 The City Manager may lay off a unit member because of shortage of work, lack of funds, material changes in duties or orcianizaticm or other valid reasons. 2.3 The City has the exclusive right and authority to schedule work and/or overtime work as required in the manner most advan- tageous to the City. 2.4 The exercise of the foregoing powers, rights, authority, duties and responsibilities of the City, the adoption of policies, rules, regulations and practices in furtherance thereof, and the use of judgement and discretion in connection herewith, shall be limited only by the specific and express terms of this MOU, and then only to the extent such specific and express terms are in conformance with law. 2.5 The City Manager and Department Heads have and wi_31continue to retain exclusive decision -making authority on matters not speci- fically and expressly modified by specific provisions of this Memo - random, and such decision -making shall not be in any way, directly or indirectly, subject to the grievance procedure contained herein. ARTICLE III Salaries 3.1 Salary Schedule a. Effective July lst 1984, the City agrees to contribute 7% of full-time unit members of employee's PERS contribution, per section 20615 of the Government Code. b. The salary schedule applicable to full-time unit members during the term of the MOU shall be as provided in Attachments "A" and shall be effective January 3, 1991. 3.2 Court Appearance Pay:1/ For off -duty court appearances pursuant to a lawful subpoena relating to events occurring during the course and scope of an employee's employment, an employee shall be credited on an hour -for -hour basis for the time actually spent in court. An employee shall be credited with a minimum of two (2) hours for the court appearance; except, where the employee's regularly scheduled work shift commences or ends within two hours after/before the court appearance, the employee shall receive court appearance pay only for the actual time spent in court and the time between the end of court and commencement of the employee's shift. Travel time shall not be considered hours worked and shall not be compensated in any manner whatsoever. Employees do not have the option of taking compensatory time off for court appearances. An employee who has been placed on standby will not be eligible for Court Appearance Pay unless thereafter the employee has been directed to appear in court. 3.3 Court Standby Pay:i/An employee may leave a telephone number where he/she may be reached while on court standby. Such time is not considered hours worked under the Fair Labor Standards Act and will not be compensated, except as set forth below. The City will pay an employee who is directed to remain on standby in 1/effective F,ebruary 1, 1991 relation to activities occurring during the course and scope of employment in the following manner: If an employee is on standby for the morning session and is called to appear in court during that morning session, he/she is paid for the appearance time only with a 2-hour minimum. If an employee is on morning session standby and is not called to appear, he/she will be paid for 1 hour of standby time. If an employee is on standby for the afternoon session and is called to appear in court during that afternoon session he/she is paid for the appearance time only with a 2-hour minimum. If an employee is on afternoon session standby and is not called to appear, he/she will be paid for 1 hour of afternoon standby time. If an employee is on standby for the morning session and is not called to appear until the afternoon session, he/she is paid for ccolrt appearance time during the afternoon and 1 hour of morning standby time. If an employee is on standby for the entire court day and is not called to appear, he/she will be paid for 2 hours of standby time. All standby pay shall be paid at the employee's base hourly rate. This payment is made pursuant to this agreement, not pursuant to FLSA. Time compensated in the above manner shall not constitute hours worked for purposes of the FLSA. Employees do not have the option of taking compensatory time off for court standby. 3.4 Call Back Pay? -/Call-back duty occurs when an employee is ordered to return to duty on a non -regularly scheduled work shift. Call-back does not occur when an employee is held over from his/her prior shift or is working continuously prior to his/her regularly scheduled shift. An employee called back to duty shall be credited with a minimum of two hours work commencing when called to duty. Call-back ends upon leaving his/her duty. Any hours worked in excess of two hours shall be credited on an hour -for -hour basis for actual time worked. 3.5 Compensation for Firearms Qualifications: Notwithstanding the provisions of ArtiEM VIII, when an officer is required to complete a firearms qualification during off -duty hours, he/she will receive one (1) hour of compensated time. Compensated time will be at straight time when the employee's hours worked does not exceed 171 hours in the pay period. If the 171 hours have been exceeded the one (1) hour will be adjusted in accordance with the Fair Labor Standards Act as amended. No additional payment will be made regardless of how long or the number of times it may take the officer to complete the qualification in each qualification period. Every effort shall be made by management to qualify officers while on duty when possible. 3.6 Increment Pay:2/Assignments to detectives, motors, and canine shall be made, and revoked, at the sole discretion of the Chief of Police. Persons assigned by the Chief of Police shall have no vested property right to such assignment. For purposes of Government Code Section 3304(b), the administrative appeal of any reassignment shall be to the Chief of Police. An employee who is assigned for at least 1/effectiyi,. February I, 1991 2/,,ffect-ive January 3, 1991 fifty percent (50 } of the scheduled work shall receive additional compensation in the du ow a pay period amounts: Motors $25.00 per pay period Detectives $25.00 per pay period Canine $37.50 per pay period The parties acknowledge that the above amounts are for the purpose of compensating an employee for the performance of incidental overtime in conjunction with their assignment while off duty and that the City incurs no further overtime obligation pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act. Increment pay shall be discontinued in the event an employee is on injury -on -duty status for a period longer than a full pay period. ARTICLE IV Basic Compensation Plan 4.1 Eligibility For Merit Salary Advancement a. Salary Step Increases: Salary step increases shall be con- sidereon a merit basis only, and then only at the following times, and in accordance with Section 4.2 below. 4.2 Qualification For Salary Advancement a. Advancement shall not be automatic, but shall be based upon merit, dependent upon increased service value of an employee to the City as exemplified by recommendations of his/her supervisor, length of service, performance record, special training under- taken and other objective evidence. b. Only employees rated as meeting the standard of work perfor- mance expected of the City employees shall qualify to advance to the salary steps (2), (3), (4), and (5). 4.3 Merit Evaluation a. Every employee shall receive an objective, written job performance evaluation no sooner than three (3) weeks.before, nor than five (5) working days after the date of eligibility for each salary step, merit longevity or hourly increase, and annually thereafter, and upon a change of employment status. Nothing in this section shall prohibit the department head to authorize a supervisor from giving an additional objective evaluation to an employee between those periods of time in this section. b. It shall be the duty of the department head to delegate the responsibility of every employee's evaluation to that level of supervision having immediate knowledge of the employee's work. An employee shall be evaluated by his/her immediate supervisor, which evaluation shall be reviewed by the department head. c. Introductory employees whether their status is new hire, promotion, or change of classification shall he given a written job performance evaluation every three (3) months during the introductory period. 4 _ 4 Salary Step Reduction: Whenever an work pertor- mance tails below the level for which a step increase was granted, an employee's authorized pay may be reduced to the employee's previous step rate under written procedures established by the City for demotions and reduction in pay. 4.5 Eligibilit For Promotion Increases: Any employee receiving a promotion shall start on the first salary step of the salary schedule for the class to which he/she is promoted and be eligible for merit increases as elsewhere provided. If the first salary step of a promoted employee's new position is compensated at less than, or the same as, the employee's former salary step, then the employee's new salary step shall be at least one step above the previous step. 4.6 Introductor Period: shall e su 7ec to a prior to consideration employee not meeting the be terminated at any time All Non -Sworn and Sworn personnel twelve (12) month introductory period of regular status with the City. An minimum standards of job performance may during the introductory period. ARTICLE V Benefits 5.1 Unifotm Allowance: The City shall contribute $420.00 per year as a uniform cleaning service for all Sworn and Non -Sworn unit members required by the City to wear uniforms. Each employee receiving uniform allowance shall at all times have available a clean regulation uniform for purposes of call out. Effective January 1, 1991, the City shall cease buying the initial uniforms of any employees. 5.2 Disability & Life Insurance: Full-time unit members shall be entitled .o participate in the Short Term Disability, Long Term Disability, Life and Accidental Death & Dismemberment insurance program currently in effect. 5.3 Worker's Compensation a. Non -Sworn: The City shall compensate unit members for a period not to exceed 30 days, on industrial accident leee in the amount of the difference between worker's compensation insurance and the unit member's regular salary. After expiration of the 30 day period, the City will pay the diff- erence between worker's compensation and the unit member's regular amount of pay to the extent of the unit member's accumulated sick leave earned by the unit member prior to his/her absence. Deduct- ions from the unit member's sick leave accrual shall be made on a pro rata basis, according to the number of hours of sick leave which is used to supplement worker's compensation. After exhaustion of accumulated sick leave, the unit member may choose to supplement the worker-s compensation payments through the pro-rata use of vacation time accrued prior to the absence. If the unit member so elects, the City shall pay the difference between the worker's compensation payment and the unit member's regular salary. In no event shall the additional compensation paid to the unit. member by virtue of the 30 day benefit, sick ;cave or vacation leave, result in the payment of a total daily, weekly or monthly compensation that exceeds the normal compensation of the worker. b. Sworn: The City shall compensate any sworn unit member who is dicabTd, whether temporarily or permanently, by injury or illness arising out of and in the course of his/her duties, in accordance with Section 4850 of the California Labor Code. 5.4 Health Insurance: Effective February 1, 1991, the City will contribute on behalf of full-time regular employees and their depen- dents a maximum of $291.00 per month towards the health insurance premium coverage plans currently in effect. 5.5 Tuition Reimbursement: (1) All affected employees are eligible to receive tuition reimbursement. Courses must have begun after appointment and be in excess of the educational standards for the position. An example of this would be job -related college or university courses when the specification for the classification calls for high school graduation. (2) Employees shall be reimbursed for tuition, registration fees and texts required for the eligible courses. Expenses for parking, travel, lodging, meals, processing fees, transcript fees, materials and any other costs are not reimbursable. (3) Employees shall be reimbursed up to the dollar amount charged for the same number of units per term by California State University, except that those enrolled in University of California courses shall be reimbursed up to the dollar amount charged for the same number of units by the UC campus attended. An employee shall not receive reimbursement in excess of five hundred dollars ($500.00) in any one fiscal year. The difference between the City's maximum obligation during any fiscal year and the amount of any actual reimbursement received by the employee during that fiscal year shall not be carried over or be available to use by the employee in any subsequent fiscal year. (4) Coursework must be related to the employee's current occupation or to a City classification to which the employee may be eligible for promotion within the employee's current job series within the next five years. (5) Courses must be traditional classroom courses taken at colleges or universities and approved by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges. Credits given for courses including, but not limited to life experience, military training, and professional training are not eligible for tuition reimbursement. (6) Coursework should not duplicate training which the employee has already had or which is to be provided in-house or previously taken courses unless special approval has been granted by the department head and the Personnel Department. (7) Courses may be approved which are required for the completion of the pre -approved job -related major. An example would be general education or elective requirements for the major as stated in the school catalog. Remedial courses or those taken as required for a non -approved major shall not be eligible. (8) Classes related to the use of purchased City -approved computer equipment may be authorized under the tuition reimbursement program if pre -approval is granted before commencement of a non -accredited class. ARTICLE VI Leaves 6.1 Sick Leaves a. Full-time unit members shall accrue sick leave at the rate of one (1) day per month, beginning with the first day of employment. Unit members hired between the first and fifteenth day of the month shall be credited with one full days sick leave for the month of hire; unit members hired between the sixteenth and the last day of the month shall begin to accrue sick leave on the first day of the following wing month. Sick leave may accrue up to a maximum of 120 days per unit member. b. Sick leave with pay shall be allowed by the City whenever a unit member's absence is due to the unit member's illness which prevented his/her attendance on the job and performance of duties on the of absence. c. Each unit member using sick leave must notify his/her immediate supervisor within two 2) hours before the time set for beginning his/her daily duties les or as may be specified by the Department Head. d. The City may require a Doctor's Certificate at any time. e. A unit member absent on an approved sick leave for less than one (1) full working day shall have his/her accumulated sick leave reduced by the number of hours absence. f. If the absence is due to an off -duty accident, the City will require a written memo from the unit member explaining the circumstances of the accident and the injury. g. Sick Leave Incentive: Retroactive to January 1, 1987, the City is implementing an incentive program to reduce sick leave abuse. To qualify, a unit member must have 192 hours of accumulated sick leave on record as of January 1, 1987 (and/or as of January 1 of each succeeding year in order to qualify for such succeeding year). Once qualified, a unit member may sell up to six (6) days of sick leave back to the City if, as of the date of November 15th following the qualification date, the unit member used six (6) or fewer sick days. If, throughout the year following the qualification date, more than six (6) days are limed, no buy 7- back is available. A qualified unit member's option to exdrcise this buy-back shall be exercised on the 15th day of November (if the 15th of November falls cn a weekend, then the option shall he exercisable on the following Monday) with payment to be made the first pay period in December. 6.2 Vacations: Full time unit members shall accumulate vacation leave in accordance with the following schedule: a. During the first five (5) years of service, unit members shall accrue ten (10) vacation days per annum. Unit members shall be eligible to take vacation leave after serving one (1) full year with the City. Under extraordinary circumstances the City may, in its discretion, permit a unit member to take vacation days prior to completion of one (1) year of service with the City. In the fourth (4th) through sixth (6th) years of service, unit members shall accrue fifteen (15) vacation days per annum. In the seventh (7th) through tenth (10th) years of service, unit members shall accrue eighteen (18) vacation days per annum. After ten (10) full years of service, unit members shall accrue twenty (20) vacation days per annum. The accrual schedule set forth above shall be effective as of January 1, 1988. b. Unit members hired between the first and fifteenth of the month shall be credited as per Section 6.1a of vacation leave for the month of hire; unit members hired between the sixteenth and the last day of the month shall begin to accrue vacation leave on the first day of the following month. c. It is the intent and purpose of this vacation policy that all unit members have and take a vacation of all yearly accrued vacation time. - Notwithstanding the above, any eligible unit member, with the consent of the head of his/her department, may defer up to 40 hours of accrued vacation per year to a maximum of 1.7.0 hours. Except as hereinafter provided, no vacation time may be deferred for a period longer than 3 years. Any amount.so deferred past 3 years shall be lost. All yearly earned vacation time, except as to the 40 hours hereinabove permitted to be deferred, must be used in the year first eligible for use. Management shall extend the date upon which an eligible unit member may lose any earned vacation hours, provided that by actions of management, said unit member was prevented from taking his earned vacation hours. Said extension shall not exceed six months. Management and each such unit member shall use their best efforts to see that all hours subject to loss are scheduled and taken within the extension period. d. In the event one or more holidays fall within an annual vacation leave, such holiday shall not be charged as vacation leave, and the leave shall be extended accordingly. e. Unit rnernbcrs who terminate employment shall be paid in a lump sum for all accrued vacation leave earned prior to the effective date of termination at the hcurly rate cf pay at the time cf termination. f. Vacation Buyback: Effective November 15 of each year, an employee may elect, at his/her option, to cash in up to a maximum of (80) hours of accrued vacation. In order to exercise this option, an employee must have a minimum of eighty (80) hours still "on the books" after the cash in. Payment shall be made at the employee's base salary rate. 6.3 Military Leave: Military leave shall be granted in accordance with the applicable provisions of State law. 6.4 Jury Leave: Any employee who is called or required to serve as a trial juror shall be entitled to a leave of absence during the period of such service or while necessarily being present in court as a result of such call. Under such circumstances, the employee shall be paid the difference between his/her full salary and any payment received by him/her except travel pay for such duty. 6.5 Extended Leaves of Absence: The City Manager may, upon written request of a regular full-time employee, grant a leave of absence without pay for a period not to exceed one (1 year. Failure on the part of the employee on leave, or within a reasonable time after notice by the City Manager to return to duty after such leave, shall be cause for discharge. 6.6 Serious Family Illness: Each calendar year unit members may take up to three (3) days Serious Family Illness leave in cases where their absence is required due to sickness or disability in the immediate family. The immediate family means the unit member's spouse, child, parent, brother or sister, and may include a grandparent or grandchild if residing with the unit member. In emergency situations, additional Serious Family Illness leave may be granted at the discretion of the City. Serious Family Illness leave shall be granted by the City when, in the judgement of management the relationship between the sick or disabled person and the unit member warrants the use of such leave. Serious Family Illness leave shall not accumulate from year-to-year. Unit members shall furnish, if required by the Police Chief, satisfactory proof showing the nature and extent the illness or injury to justify the absence. 6.7 Each unit member may take up to five (5) days Bereavement leave in the event of the death of a member of the immediate family, as defined in Paragraph 6.6, above. ARTICLE VII Holidays 7.1 Unit members shall be granted the _follow a) New Year's Day (January 1st) b) Lincoln's Birthday (February 12th) c) Washington's Birthday (3rd Monday in d) Memorial Day (last Monday in May) e) Independence Day ( July 4th) f) Labor Day (1st Monday in September) g) Columbus Day (2nd Monday of October) h) Veteran's Day (November llth) i) Thanksgiving Day and the day November and the day after) j) Christmas Day (December 25th) 7.2 When a holiday falls on a Saturday, the preceding Friday shall be observed as a holiday. When a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be observed as a holiday. 7.3 If a holiday occurs day off, he/she shall amount of e4 ht (8) hours q holidays: February) after (4th Thursday in on a day which is the employee's regular be entitled to holiday pay in the at straight time. 7.4 If an employee works on a holiday, he/she shall be entitled to holiday pay in the amount of eight (8) hours at straight time. 7.5 At the discretion of the department head all non -essential employees may be given the holiday off in lieu of pay. 7.6 Procedure On Callin In Sick On Holidays: When an employee calls in sick on a o i ay, which holiday is a normal duty shift, the employee shall not be entitled to holiday pay. If the employee is entitled to holiday pay due to his hire date, on the day the employee calls in sick, the employee shall be credited with a day off in lieu of holiday pay. If the employee is not entitled to the earned holiday due to the employee's hire date, the employee shall be charged a sick day if such day is accumulated. 7.7 Effective September 1, 1984 earned Holiday pay shall be payable on or about December 18th of each year. ARTICLE VIII Working Hours and Overtime 8.1 Each employee shall be in actual attendance on duty for a minimum of eight (8) hours on each day that the employee is assigned to work. Each such eight (8) hour period on duty shall constitute one (1) work day. Said eight (8) hour period shall include a thirty (30) minute lunch period and two (2) breaks of ten (10) minutes duration. All employees shall normally work twenty (20) days in each twenty eight (28) day work period and shall normally be entitled to eight (8) regular days off during each twenty-eight (28) day work period. Overtime shall be hours worked in excess of the normal work day or in excess of the total number of hours included in the regularly scheduled duty days during a deployment period. Approval to work overtime shall be secured prior to :rozr. from a first li_nn supervisor or above. 8.2 Tire Worked: The maximum number of hours worked for Non -Sworn personnel per each seven (7) day work period paid at the regular rate of pay shall be forty (40) hours inclusive of breaks. The maximum number of hours worked for Sworn personnel per each twenty- eight (23) day work period paid at the regular rate shall be one hundred seventy one (171) hours, inclusive of breaks. 8.3 Time Not Considered As Time Worked: The following activities shall not be considered time worked, except as provided for in this Memorandum of Understanding. a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) Meal breaks - except as authorized by this MOU. Leave of absence (vacation leave, sick leave, leave, IOD, Etc.) All travel time to work personal or city vehicle. All time in off -duty training assignments study time, meal time, sleep time, etc.). All off -duty travel to training sites and returning All time putting on and taking off uniforms. All time for personal preparation and clean-up. All off -duty time spent in vehicle, equipment, and/or animal maintenance. All time worked for which unit employees have already been paid at one and one-half ( 1 1/2) times their regular rate of pay within their 171 hours, twenty-eight (28) day work period for Sworn personnel and within forty (40) hours, seven (7) day work period for Non -Sworn personnel. All time spent on court standby time. All sleep time and meal time as defined in excess of twenty-four (24) hours. All time assigned on standby assignment recall devices. Any time not authorized as work time. holiday and returning home in either (home work, home. with special detail and/or assigned 8.4 Modified Work Schedule: The City agrees to conduct a feasibility study with respect to the implementation of a modified work schedu?.e in the police department. On completion of the study, the City shall make the study available to the Association. Upon request of the Association the City will meet and discuss the results and recommendations of the study. These meetings are not to be characterized as "meet and confer" or "meet and consult" within the meaning of Government Code Sections 3500 et. seq. The decision to implement any modified work schedule is at the sole discretion of the Chief of Police and the City Manager. If implemented, the modified work schedule may be revoked at any time by the City. Any modified work schedule shall not be considered a vested right or benefit and the City has no obligation to "meet and confer" or "meet and consult" prior to revocation. Any revocation shall not be subject to any internal grievance or appeal process or court action. ARTICLE IX personnel. Reduction Procedure 0.1 Seniority: When the City orders a reduction in the wort: force, the layoff of unit members shall be based upon seniority within the classification. 9.2 Seniority Date: A unit member's seniority date shall be the first day he/she rendered service for the City. The seniority date of a returning unit member, after resignation or termination, shall be the first working day after the break in service. 9.3 Introductory Employees: Unit members on introductory status (new employees and promotional employees) shall be laid off before permanent employees in the same classification. 9.4 Ties in Seniority: Unit members in the same classification with equal seniority shall be laid off based upon past performance ratings and relative ability as determined by the City. 9.5 Voluntary Reduction in Rank: A unit member who is subject to layoff may, in lieu of layoff, choose to take a reduction to a lower classification, within the department provided he/she gives written notice to his/her department head ten (10) calendar days after receiving a notice of layoff. In order to exercise bumping rights, the unit member must have previously served in the lower classification , and he/she must have seniority over the unit member being displaced. 9.6 Notice: The City shall give affected unit members written notice fourteen (14) days prior to the effective date of the layoff. Under emergency circumstances, the notice period may be shortened. 9.7 Re-employment: Unit members laid off or taking voluntary reduction in service shall be re-employed in the inverse order of their layoff or reduction in rank. Unit members laid off or taking a voluntary reduction in rank shall be maintained on the re-employment list until such unit member once refuses to accept reinstatement. ARTICLE X Grievance Procedure 10.1 Grievance: A "grievance" shall mean a written allegation by unit member that a violation, misinterpretation or misapplication of the specific terms of this MOU has occurred. 10.2 Representatives: The unit member, administrator or City may be represented during any step of this procedure, except the informal conference, by any person designated by such party to act in his/her behalf. 10.3 Days: Reference to days regarding time periods in the pro- cedure shall mean work days. A work day is defined as all week days not designated as holidays under the terms of this MOU. 10.4 Time Limitation and Waiver: A grievance shail not be valid unless it is submitted to the Citv's designee, on the orescriberi form setting forth the facts and the specific provision of the MOT] allegedly violated and the particular relief soucilit within fifteen (15) days after the date the event giving rise to the grievance occurred. Failure to appeal a grievance from one level to another within the time periods provided shall also constitute a waiver of the grievance. Failure by the City's representative to issue a decision within the time periods provided herein shall constitute a denial of the grievance and the grievant may appeal to the next level. The City's representative, prior to issuing a decision at Step one (1) or Step two (2), shall meet with the grievant and his/her representative, if any. 10.5 Informal Conference: Prior to filing a grievance, the unit member must discuss the grievance with his/h2r immediate supervisor to adjust the alleged grievance informally. 10.6 Step 1: If the grievance is not resolved through the _infor- mal conference with the immediate supervisor, the unit member must file a grievance with the Division Commander or the Police Chief's designee within the time prescribed in paragraph 10.4. A written decision shall be given to the grievant within ten (10) days after receipt of the grievance. 10.7 Step 2: If the grievance is not resolved at Step 1, the grievant shall have five (5) days after receipt of the Step 1 decision to file a written appeal to the Police Chief. The Police Chief shall give his written decision to the grievant within ten (10) days after receipt of the appeal. 10.8 Step 3: If the grievance is not resolved at Step 2, the grievan shall have five (5) days after receipt of the Step 2 decision to file a written appeal to the City Manager. The City Manager shall give his written decision to the grievant within ten (10) days after receipt of the appeal. 10.9 Mediation: After a decision is issued in Step 3, and prior to appeal to Step 4, the parties may jointly agree to submit the dispute to the State Conciliation Service for mediation. If the dispute is not resolved in mediation, the grievant shall have five (5) days after the meeting date with the mediator to appeal to Step 4. 10.10 St4: In the event the grievance is not resolved at Step 4 or mediation, the grievant shall have five (5) days after receipt of the Step 3 decision or five (5) days after the last clay of mediation, whichever is applicable, to tile a written appeal with the City Manager for a hearing before the City Council. Such appeal shall be filed with the City Clerk no later than the next regular scheduled council meeting. The City Council shall give the grievant written notice of the date and time of the hearing which shall he conducted within Forty-five (45) days after such notice is given. -13- 10.11 Hearing Procedure: The hearing shall be conducted before the City Council in executive session. Both parties may call wit- nesses, cross examine witnesses and introduce exhibits into evidence. The mayor or his designee shall determine matters of procedure and rules on questions of evidence. The grievant may, if he/she chooses, be represented by counsel or other person of his/her choosing. 10.12 Final Decision: Within twent (20) days after the hearing, the Council shall give its written ecision to the grievant, which decision shall be final and binding. ARTICLE XI 11.1 The provisions of this MOU shall apply to all persons covered by this MOU without discrimination on account of sex, age, race, color, national origin, or creed; nor will there be discrimination in respect to hiring and retention or any condition of employment because of membership in or activities on behalf of the Association. 11.2 The Association has no restrictions on membership based on sex, age, color, race, national origin, or creed. ARTICLE XIII Completion of Meet and Confer 12.1 During the term of this MOU, the parties shall not meet and confer with respect to any subject or matter whether or not referred to in this MOU, unless mutually agreed otherwise. 12.1 The parties agree tc reopen this MOU on the subject of joint dispatching. ARTICLE XIV Savings Cause 13.1 Should any provision of the MOU, or any application thereof, be unlawful by virtue of any Federal, State or local laws and regulations, or by any court decision, such provision shall be effective and implemented only to the extent permitted by such law, regulation or court decision. But in all other respects, the provisions of the MOU shall continue in full force and effect for the term thereof. SAN JACINTO POLICE OFFICERS CITY OF SAN JACINTO ASSOCIATION Representative City Manager Representative City Negotiator Date: Date: I1INUTES San Jacinto City Council. and the Council Sitting as the Redevelopment Agency and Industrial Development Authority Regular Adjourned Meeting 22 January 1991 The regular meeting of the San Jacinto City Council, the Council sitting as the Redevelopment Agency and Industrial Development Authority was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Boykin at the Community Center, 625 S. Pico Avenue. Roll Call - Present: Councilmen Boykin, Ford, Hafliger, Rose and Councilwoman Leahy. Staff Members - Acting City Manager Chadwick, Community Development Director McNabb, Asst. City Manager Garcia, Police Chief Kozma, Water Superintendent Townsel and City Attorney Jim Cox. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes of January 8, 1991. B. Approval of Warrant Nos. 24104 through 24206 in the amount of $721,157.54, as submitted by the City Manager. C. Financial Report of Activity for period ending December 31, 1990. (Receive and file.) D. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1926 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, ordering the annexation of certain uninhabited territory to the City of San Jacinto. (Annexation No. 64) E. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1927 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, initiating proceedings for the annexation of certain territory generally located south of Scott Road, west of Lyon Avenue, east of Sanderson Avenue and north of Seventh Street in the City of San Jacinto (Annexation No. 65) F. Authorization to release Labor & Material Performance Bonds in the Tr.: -it of $39,752.28. Applicant: JAC Associates Location: Parcel Map 25021 (San Jacinto Village Apartments, 700 Idyllwild Drive) (Staff recommends approval) G. Claim of Jose Leiva for damages. (City Attorney recommends denial.) H. Claim of Southern California Gas Co. for damages in the amount of $647.52. (City Attorney recommends acceptance.) I. Claim of Sal Cervantes for damages. (City Attorney recommends denial.) J. Authorization to Accept Use of Land for Police Department Shooting Range. (Staff recommends approval.) 1-22-.91 Minutes Page 2 K. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1928 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, establishing rates for the collection of garbage and rubbish collected within or by the said City of San Jacinto. (City Attorney recommends approval.) L. Reduction of Bonds for Tract Nos. 23789, 23790 and 23791 Applicant: Friedman Homes Tract 23789 Labor and Material bonding for water from $131,385.00 to $32,846.25 and sewer bonding from $131,385.00 to $65,692.50. Tract 23789 Performance bonding for water from $131,385.00 to $65,692.50 and sewer bonding from $131,845.00 to $65,922.50. Tract 23790 Labor and Material bonding for water from $56,615.00 to $14,153.75 and sewer bonding from $56,615.00 to $28,307.50 .Tract 23790 Performance bonding for water from $56,615.00 to $28,307.50 and for sewer from $56,659.40 to $28,329.70. Tract 23791 Labor and Material bonding for water from $74,650.00 to $28,662.50 and sewer bonding from $71,817.00 to $17,954.25. Tract 27391 Performance bonding for water from $74,650.00 to $37,325.00 and sewer bonding from $71,817.00 to $35,908.50. (Staff recommends approval.) M. Release and Reduction of Bonds for Tract No. 24745 Applicant: Forecast Corporation Tract 24745 Labor and Material Bonds release. Tract 24745 Performance Bonds from $91,850.00 to $20,000.00 for water and from $212,728.00 to $75,000.00 for street improvements. (Staff recommends approval.) N. Release and Reduction of Bonds for Tract 21564-10, 11 and 12. Applicant: Rice Young Pacific Release Labor and Material Bonds. Reduce Performance Bonds to $10,000.00 (Staff recommends approval.) 0. Ratification of Variance 8-90 Applicant: Howard Burns Location: .78 acres located south of the Ramona Expressway, west of State Street Request for variance to parking requirements for a drive thru restaurant. (Planning Commission recommends approval, subject to staff report and findings of fact.) P. Ratification of Conditional Use PeLmit 12-90 Applicant: Howard Burns Location: same as Item 0. above (Planning Commission recommends approval) Q. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda pursuant to City Attorney. Motion by Councilman Ford to move Item I-K to VII per City Attorney. Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 5-0. 1-22-91 Minutes Page 3 Motion by Councilman Rose to add Item R to Consent Calendar. R. Joint Use Agreement with Southern California Edison Company to allow power poles to be relocated from private property to public right-of-way within Tract 26020. Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 5-0. Councilman Hafliger questioned Item 0 and the need for allowing traffic flow in and out of the Ramona Expressway. Police Chief Kozma provided an overhead showing the uniqueness of the property and location and the requirement to allow access onto the Expressway. Chief Kozma further advised that the parking for employees was located away from the Expressway. Motion by Councilman Rose to remove Item I -I to next regular meeting on February 5, 1991 for additional information from Staff. Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 5-0. Motion by Councilman Hafliger to approve Consent Calendar items A through Q plus R minus I and K and adopt Resolution Nos. 1926, 1927, and waive the readings in full. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Motion carried: 5-0. Councilman Ford requested a thank -you letter from the Mayor's Office be sent to Roger Morgan for allowing use of his property as a shooting range for the Police Department. 11 PUBLIC HEARING A. Environmental Impact Assessment and Change of Zone 23-90 Applicant: Daniel Hollingsworth Location: 600' east of Sanderson Avenue, 1321' south of Cottonwood Avenue. A proposed pre -annexation zone change. Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development, gave a brief presentation on the request of the applicant, stating that the property was within Annexation #65, approved by LAFCO in December. Planning Commission recommends City Council adopt Ordinance 927 approving Change of Zone 23-90, subject to findings of fact and grant a negative declaration. 1-22-91 Minutes Page 4 The Mayor opened the Public Hearing. The Deputy City Clerk stated that no written or verbal comments had been received and that proof of affidavit of publication is on file. Blaine Womer, Unland & Associates, representing the applicant notified Council that he was there to answer any questions they may have. Councilman Ford inquired if the Kangaroo Rat had been found in the area. Mr. Womer stated that no report/inspection had been done as of this date. Motion by Councilman Rose to introduce Ordinance No. 927, approving Change of Zone 23-90, amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto, to second reading, subject to findings of fact and grant a Negative Declaration and waive the reading in full. Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 5-0. Mayor Boykin requested moving Item V-B before Item III to allow A. J. Wilson, Executive Director of WRCOG to speak before Council and provide him time to speak before two other Council meetings this evening. Mr. Wilson presented the goals and objectives for WRCOG to the Council, asking for any comments or additions/deletions prior to the end of January, to allow final action at the February meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Ford was a member of the group working on the goals the past seven or eight months. Motion by Councilman Rose to recommend to WRCOG that the proposed goals and objectives be adopted. Seconded by Councilman Ford Motion carried: 5-0. Motion by Councilman Rose to appoint Mayor Boykin as the member to WRCOG and Mayor Pro Tem Ford as the alternate. Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 5-0. 111 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS No one requested to speak 1-22-91 Page 5 IV i ute CITY DEPARTMENTS A. Update on The Villas Water Issue John Townsel, Water Superintendent, advised Council that the project was progressing and that the notice for bids was being published next week for the looping from Sombra to Encanto. Mr. Townsel presented a representative from the Keith Company, Mike Jouhari, to update the Council on the information/results they are developing on a solution to the water problems within the City. Mr. Jouhari allowed that a final report would be provided in the next 7-10 days. Mr. Jouhari showed slides of the source of contamination and the effects of the iron and manganese, stating existing conditions did not constitute a health hazard. Mr. Jouhari advised that the cost would be approximately $600-$700,000 to eliminate the problems and it would require approximately 30 days preparation of engineering reports, etc. and another 30 days for construction. Mr. Johnson, 1069 Sombra Way, presented a letter to Council from Mr.. -and Mrs. Jeff Rohr, 1061 Sombra Way, granting the City approval for crossing their property to expedite completion of water delivery to The Villas, eliminating a dead-end line. Mr. Townsel advised the Council that bids received for the work to eliminate the dead-end line would be presented to Council at their February 19, 1991 meeting. Councilman Hafliger inquired what the cost of pipelines to change over, repair and make compatible might cost. Mr. Townsel advised the City required an additional nine miles of old line to be replaced and the cost was approximately $30-$40/ft. B. Change Order #2 - B & Sons - Downtown Waterline - John Townsel John Townsel, Water Superintendent, advised that the new well located on the same acreage as Bath Well, requires an extension and replacement of 8" water main to put it in use, reflected on B & Sons, Change Order #2. B & Sons is quoting the same price as was received from their low bid on the downtown water replacement bid. Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to approve Change Order #2 for B & Sons in an amount not to exceed $19,800. Seconded by Councilman Ford. Motion carried: 5-0. 1-22-91 Minutes Page 6 C. 17th Year CDBG Application Process - Henry Garcia Henry Garcia, Asst. City Manager, gave Council an overview of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) process for selecting projects to be considered for CDBG funds and advised that the deadline was March 8, 1991 for submission to the County. Motion by Councilman Ford to authorize City Manager to put together posters and radio announcements regarding the 17th Year CDBG Funds. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Motion carried: 5-0. V MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/COMMENTS A. Senior Day Care Center of Hemet/San Jacinto Mayor Boykin requested comments and suggestions on the recommendations made by the Ad hoc committee on Senior Day Care Center. Councilwoman Leahy inquired if the microwave and refrigerator can be left in the small office to be assumed by the Community Center. After discussion with Mr. Bacher from the Day Care Center and Margaret Cameron, Community Center Director, it was agreed that the appliances could remain and a schedule for use worked out between the Community Center and Day Care Center. Motion by Councilman Ford to adopt the supplement to the Agreement with the Day Care Center (shown as Attachment #1 to Minutes). Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 4-1 (Councilman Rose voting no) C. Discussion of City Clerk Function City Clerk Maurice Armster gave a presentation to Council on some suggestions being considered for the organization and enhancement of Council meetings. Mayor Pro Tem Ford suggested the City Clerk, City Manager, Mayor and Deputy City Clerk meet to consider the suggestions. D. San Jacinto Memorial Park Mayor Boykin advised Council of a request from the Museum Association to locate a monument in Memorial Park (previously approved by Council), recognizing the Gromov flight achievement. At this time the precise location and a date for dedication is being requested. As the final plans for design of the Memorial Park have not been approved, it is not possible to provide the requested information and the Mayor was directed to communicate this to the Museum Association. 1-22-91 Minutes Page 7 E. Soboba Springs Mobile Home Park trash collection City Manager Easter, via memo, requested that this subject matter be referred to Staff for follow-up in a February meeting. Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to refer to Staff for follow-up at the February 5, 1991 meeting. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Motion carried: 5-0. VI. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Potential Litigation & Labor Negotiations Motion by Councilman Ford to go into Executive Session for potential litigation and discussion of labor negotiations at 9:20 p.m. Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 5-0 Motion by Councilman Ford to return to Regular Session at 10:47 Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 5-0. Let the record show that no action was taken as a result of this Executive Session. VII. CITY ATTORNEY I K. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1928 Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to adopt Resolution No. 1928, establishing rates for the collection of garbage and rubbish collected within or by the said City of San Jacinto. Seconded by Councilman Rose. p.m. Motion carried: 5-0. A. Proposed modification to refuse franchise contract City Attorney Cox presented to Council the contract modifications requested by O.K. Associates to their current franchise agreement for refuse services. The modification clarifies that the January 1, 1991, County pass through tipping fee increase, he excluded from the City's 16% fee. 1-22-91 Minutes Page 8 Hy Weitzman, Executive Director to Riverside -San Bernardino Waste Management Association, representing O.K. Associates spoke on the subject of the tipping fees and the requirement for the County to have funds available at all times to close any land fill. Motion by Councilman Rose authorizing the Mayor to execute the Agreement, effective January 1, 1991. Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 5-0. Acting City Manager Chadwick introduced Anna Vega, the City's new Finance Director, to Council. Chief Chadwick advised the Council that the Council/City Manager Retreat has been set for February 15 and 16, 1991. Motion by Councilman Rose to adjourn to February 5, 1991 at 7:30 p.m. Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 5-0. Meeting adjourned at 11:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted Nancy Randolph Deputy City Clerk Approved: Maurice Armster City Clerk . A G3 Eill:K UNITED CALIF�R�IA ���K A/C 2O1398 DATE 1/lI7'� �HECK IS�UED TO DESIPTION 1 AMOUNT 242O7* STATE OF CALIFORNIA USE T�X RETURN 5O7.O0 24208* UNION DANK C�F�D, 2 TAX INCEMENT-1 845^81 242O9* PMW ASSOCIATES T�ITION~FITZPAT�ICK/P,D^ 332~00 24210* FIRST INTERSTATE BANK FEDERAL TAXES 14,061^14 24211w FIRST INTERSTATE BANK SS MEDICARE 1�4415.82 24212* STATE QF CALIFQRNIA STAITE TAXES 2,934°13 24213* CITY OF SAN JACINTO NET PAYROLL 85,501,42 24214* PUBLIC EMP, ASSOC. PER[ 476^28 24215* S,J^ POLICE ASSOC^ SJPB DUES 1,117,0O 24216* DoVE DAVIDSON P,D+ RESERVE-FAYROLL 24.00 24217* RIVERSIDE CO+ EMP^ CREDIT UNION 2,091.5O 2421E)* PUBLIC EMP, RET~ SYSTEM RETIREMENT 36,687.99 24219* S°J~ WORKERS/ COMP^ REIMBURGE ACCOUNT 13,994^74 CLAII::,E BURSON REIMB+ MILEAGE/SCHOOL 97"76 24221* EDELBROCK Sf\LES TAX REBATE 4'496,00 24222* JOE KOZMA POLICE CHIEF CONFERENCE 800^00 24223* KE#NETH LEAHY 5EM.NARCITY TREASURER 165°36 24224* DENNIS LOVE POST SEMINAR 255^80 24225* NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOC. SEMIMAA-L, MORA 124.00 24226* S.J. WORKERS^ COMP. REIMBURSE ACCOUNT 2,657.50 24227* SEIKO INSTRUMENTS 6- BX^ LABEL PRINTER BLDG. & PLMG^ 61°95 24228* UNION BANK C^F,[), 2 TAX INCREMENT--1 99~Q20.27 24229* ASSC^ OF ENVIROMENTAL SEP- IINAR-ELLSWORTH 100+00 24230* MATICH CORPORATION C^F,B. �2--STREET IMPROVEMENTS 22'676~81* 24231* B & SONS CONSTRUCTION Wr-'�TERLINE BID PROJECT 9'091^68 24232* DOUG SHIPMA# GEMINAR--BUILDING DEPT. 629.60 Z4233* T.R.S. ADDITIONAL- SS MEDICARE 476~96 242�54* REGIONAL TRAINING TUITP IDN-QOUTY 245~08 Z4235* DIANA PI'ZOUTY GICHOOL r- It, 246^00 24236* EASTERN MUNI~WATER DIST SEWER COLLECTIONS 62'474^27 Z4237* CACDA T11ITIO#~RICKMAH 13O^O0 24238* RED LION LODGING-RZCKMAN 201^00 Z4239* UNIGLOBE ENTP^ TRAVEL TRANSPORTATION-�ICKMAN 78^00 Z4240 KEVIN FITZPATRICK WORKSHOP~P^D^ 328^OO 1.4241 DENNIS LOVE 46,45 Z4242 SAMUEL RICKMA# 161^04 Z4243 FRANK STEENPORT SCHOQL �EESD, 255^00 24244 BILL RUTLEDGE PC HEETIHG 100^00 Z424� DAVID VER PLANK PC HEETING 100.00 Z4246 ROBERT W+ HQWE P100^00 24247 YVONNE IACONO Ml.ETING 100400 Z4248 SLENN TAYLDR PC HEETING 1OO,0O �4249 ALERT BARRICA[/E GELINE�TORS-f�^W~ 662^96 �425O ALPHA BETA SUPPLIE��P'D^ & CIVIC 1O4^12 �4251 AM~CARE HEALTH" INC^ 135^00 �4252 AHERICAN SOCIETY EMPL8Y��NT ADS ~^ PUBLIC WORKS 285~0O l4253 ANADY/S TROHPIES N�ME I.:-�DTING PLATES-PLANNI�G DEPT 49^25 l425LOU] R. ARROYA. JR^ JA#IT�RIAL GERVICE~�CIVIC & C.C~ 1'214~00 4 24255 ARROW PRINTING DUS. LIC"/ WATER 419^63 � l4256 ARROW STRAI8HT ST�IPIN�~S,J^ AVENUE 877^O0 �4257 E^S^ BABCOCK � SONS LA8 TE�TS 121^O0 GLCD12 ^.iTYOF SA� JACINTO REGl�|�� U� �UDITED DEMANDS PAGE 2 CHECK 24258 24259 24260 24261 24262 24263 24264 24265 24266 24267 24268 24269 24270 24271 24272 24273 24274 24275 24276 24277 24278 24279 24280 24281 Z4282 24284 Z4285 24286 Z4287 24288 Z4289 Z429O Z4291 Z4292 �4293 Z4294 4295 24296 �4297 Z4298 �4299 l43OO �43O1 �4302 �43O3 Z43(>4 �43O5 Z43U6 �43O7 UNI�ED CALIF���I� BANK A/C 201398 DATE 1/31/91 ISSUED TO BANCROFT WRITNEY co, OLIVIA BEAN MATTHEW & CO^ BIRMINGHAM'S BOETHING TREELAND JQHN R. BYERLY CACDA STATE OF CALIF^ CA. MUNICIPAL TREASURER CA^ REDEVELOPMENT CA^PEACE OFFICERS ASS017, CA. STATE LIBRARY DEPT. OF JUSTICE MARGARET CAMEROW CUEROKEE LANDSCAPE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT CITY OF SAN JACI#TO ANDREW / LIMA CORTEZ MICHAEL BLACK2NSHIP LETICIA SANCHEZ CATHBlINE HURST KAREN JOHNSTON JOAN SIMPSON MADONNA DAVENPORT DANIB- MC CLEERY COM SER CO. CITY OF CORONA CON~WAY WESTER'N EXPRES� CURRY SURFACING L^N, CURTISS CURRY COPY CENTER DAMON REFERENCE LAB, CITY DESERT HOT SPRIN�S | ASTERN MUNI~WATER DI�T B.-CO CONTRACTORS ENTENMANN�ROVIN CO~ �VAN8 TIRE CO. OFELIA FIERRO FEDERAL EXPRES-S CD, FEDERAL LICENSINS STEVE FILARSKY FIRE TRUCK S�RV�CES FONTANA �AVINGS~ INC^ F�OTHILL ENGINE & PUM� HENRY GARCIA GTE MOBILE GE�EKAL TELEPHONE CO. TAMR-1 GERARD HENRY HAFLlGEP JOHN H�RSA�Y J�~ M~D^ DESC�IPTION AMOUNT COPIEG PENAL CODE_P+D+ 320^28 REFUNI SECURITY DEPOSIT-C^C+ 205^00 POLICE CIVIL LIABILITY 79410 CH�IN SAW SUPPLlES�P^W, Be TREES-R;�NCHO So-Jo24'757~51'� COMP8CTIQN TEST 882~75 MEMBERSAIP-RICKNAN 35^00 FEE FOR M/H PARKS 3,950.0O MEMDER�AIP�LEAHY' KEN 75^08 MEMBER8HIP-EASTER 865°00 1991 SQBSCRIPTIQN~P^D^ 50^00 CATALOG --STATE GRANTS 21.4O FINGERPR'IMT PROCESSIHG-P°D+ 27.00 REIMI!���SE MILEA£E-JULY DECEMBER 171^99 LANDSCAPE MAINT^ 2'400°(}0 MW0BAL~r-� & P 76°00 CONSUMER DEPOSITS 2,662~13 CONSUMER DEPOSITS 50^00 CONSUMER DEPOSITS 22^55 COHSUM�� DEPOSITS 37~13 CONSUMER DEPOSITS 7.98 CORSUMETZ DEPOSITS 37^07 CGNS!]ME� DEPOSITS 10^38 (CONSUMER DEPOSITS 11438 C8HSDM�� DEPOSITS . 30~69 f��CUM[R D[PGCITS uQ'� a E'l f`7,69 SER\/ICEG ~ P.D~ 261.26 COUNCIL. CO0FERE'NCE-fORD 23^00 SHIPPIN� CHAROES-WATER BEPT^ 68^09 SHARPE# BLABE5~-P~W^ 60~00 .�ACKET 471^52 CASE O� PAPER^^C^C� 41+00 LI,"BORATORY FEES~P.D. 538^00 CDNFERE#CE~ANNA VEGA 265~32 UTILITIES 577~28 M�TERIAA-S FOR P'ARK HILL TANK 1977^45 BADGES~f1'056~44 TIRES � R��PAIRS~-AL1- DEPARTMENTS 3,40�~26 GAS MILEAGE~^COMMUNITY CENTER 37^13 T.J. 13^00 REHEW RADIO LICENSE -CIVIC CENTER 145^00 PROFES�IONAL SERVICE 8,370^00 WO��� P[�FORMED ENGINE 641 222.36 CL�SS 2 BASE 130^83 W[)RK PE�FORMED PEACOCK WELL 4,945^00� SRAL BO�RD LUNCH~MAINTENANCE WORKER 31,84 �DDILE TELEPHONE 282.49 TEL, CD#M. 1�298.19 LOGG ~CIVIC CENTER 455,25 �EI�B^-CONFERENCE 207.00 ;iEDIC�L SERVICE2-P^D 4�2.O0 GLCD12 ° ^oiTY OF ��N JACINTO CHECK 24309 24310 24311 24312 24313 24314 24315 24316 �4317 24318 24319 24320 24321 24322 24323 24324 24325 24326 24327 24328 24329 24330 24331 24332 24333 24334 Z4335 114336 24337 24338 �4339 Z434O �4341 l4342 24343 24344 .14345 24346 �4347 Z4348 �4349 Z435O Z4351 Z4352 Z4353 Z4354 !4355 l4356 UNITED CALIFD-0NIA 2101398 DATE 1/31/91 I8SUED TO HEMET CYCLE CENTER HEMET NEWS HEMET VALLEY IMAGING HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE HOT SHOTS 1 HOUR PHOTO INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT INLAND FOUNDATION ENG^I LONG BEACH UNIFORM JUAREZ AUTO UPHOLSTERY KERN EQUIPT^ CO, JANET LEAHY LONGS DRUG STORE JOSE LUNA MARCO°S APPLIANCE MARKMAN. ARZYNSKI MAnDEN~SUS(-'O MOTOROLA C. & E. INC. MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES NBS/LOWRY NATL^FIRE PROT.ASSOC^ PHIL NEWCOMB. JR^ PACIFIC M(-iNAGEMENT PACTEL CELLULAR -LA PERVO PAINT P^D. PETTY CASH SAN JACINTO FIRE DEPT. RACEWAY FORD RAMONA ANIMAL HAVEN MIKE READE CHEV~ SON JACINTO GLASS CO^ S.J. WORKERS' COMP. SAN J8CINTO WEEK SCAG SCOTSMAN MANUFACTURING SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO^ LES SOYLAND SPARTAN MOTORS SO. CALlFORNIA EDISON T N T CATERING TKAVEL EMPORIUM U,S^ POSTMASTER VLY.ECONOhIC DEV,COUNCI WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODU�T WESTERN NURSE SPEC, WESTERN RIVERSIDE MEL WHITE WHIT�KER BROTHERS XERO� CORPOR�TION SETON NAME PLATE CO^ DI ESC�IPTIQN HOTORCYCLE COVE�~f^D° nUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL & ADVERTISING EX�MS~P~D^ Fl.A��HER�P°D^ FILM P.D.PROCESSING-& F,D. COLD MIX COMPACTION TESTING VEST--P.D. REP�IR CHAIR -DISPATCH PHRTS~SWEEPER REIMD'+~C8NFERENCE FILM DEPT^ REIMB^~TUITIDN & BOOK REPAIR APPLIANCES-P~D° pR8FESGIO#AL. SERVICE WTIS. PIPE & SUPPLIES CELLULAR' PHONE C~F,D, :�2 CHARGES C^F,D 2 - PHASE I GEM I08R~DOUG 5l-lIPMA# REIMB'. STORAGE OF VEHICLE CONTR`CTOR INFORMATION SYSTEM CELLL}L;\�M SERVICE PAIHT ��L�PF'LIES~~P^W^ PAD, PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PARTS-'P^D~ A�IM�L�-DE[�EMBER �EHICL� F'ARTSALL DEPARTMENTS PLEXIGL�SS-MI6TLETOE PARK REIMBU��SE ACCOUNT PU8LIC WORKS --AD COMPUTERISED DATA BASE�BLDG^ DEPT. MONTH! Y LEASE~F^D^ TRIPOD�P.D^ REF;ND WATER IMPR~-T COMMUNIY DEVLP. P4%RTS-�~D, UTILITY C�TERI�S~AS8ESSMENT CENTER 'IR ~CITY MANAGE� MAILING -CIVIC MEH8E|��HIP DUES �IGNS�P^W^ �LGGD D�AWS'P~D^ HEMBER�AIP DUES �ENT�L Nfj(-)N'f% CENTER M�INTE��NCE SHREDDER~P^D, �AI/�TE��NCE-CHAMBER RESTR��� SIGNS~PARKS DEPARTMENT f{ Reimbursed to City through CFD#2 ~~' AMOUNT G5^34 1O9^O8 175^30 116^20 425^83 192.42 557^38 439.76 50^0O 112^90 19Q.00 63^64 163.97 144~34 2,5O6^0O 407^9O 7.31 8'516.30� 12,295.00�f 695^00 79^0U 658,76 667~36 2^744^51 95~6O 2O^3O 466^53 287^00 558.78 396^18 3^012^41 118^D0 500^O0 1,768~17 64.00 25O~OO 43^6O 101^24 300400 44.00 75^0O 250^OO 1,598~68 120^00 1.924~O5 30~0O 219^0O 157.48 173^49 FI@AL TOTAL 483,O9O.87 I, &ouai -Vegm, Fiuo=-e Dir(,mLr, do hereby certify to the b��1 of my knowledge uoU ribilit-�7, tho above uod tore8o4og i- a true ciud corre"L list of x'acrqotx foz bills submitted to the Ci-�y oi Sao JuciuLo -for the. Q�ciod Jaooary 16 Lbrougb 31, 1991., and �hat there CITY OF SAN JACINTO TREASURER'S OFFICE TIME DEPOSIT REGISTER Bank & Acct. No. Issued Maturity Rate Amt. Inv. Int. this Mo. State of California 9833794 02-20-85 Open 8.194 3,200,000. 66,682.70 Red. 5133120 01-19-88 Open 8.194 1,600,000. 22,922.18 Great Western 389-600153-8 01-04-91 02-21-91 7.150 50,000. 310.98 389-602847-3 12-26-90 02-21-91 7.600 500,000. 389-606357-9 01-07-91 04-08-91 7.300 700,000. 4,470.28 Far West Savings 013-10432-8 01-15-91 04-15-91 7.900 98,000. 687.09 Red, 013-14016-5 01-15-91 04-15-91 7.900 98,000. 687.09 013-16299-5 01-30-91 04-15-91 7.600 98,000. 708.87 Home Savings 107-022764-8 01-08-91 03-09-91 7.400 300,000. 455.01 Red. 107-024916-2 FUNDS MOVED TO STATE 1,367.15 Total Invested $6,644,000 $ 98,291.35 January 1991 Register Federal I.D. No. 95-6000780 CITY OF SAN JACINTO TREASURER'S OFFICE TIME DEPOSIT REGISTER CIVIC CENTER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT BONDS Bank & Acct. No. Great Western Bank 389-603896-9 389-603897-7 389-607952-6 Home Savings 107-022762-2 107-022769-7 Issued 01-07-91 01-04-91 01-15-91 01-30-91 01-12-91 January 1991 Register Federal I.D. No. 95-6000780 Maturity Rate Amt. Inv. Int. This Mo. 04-08-91 02-21-91 02-21-91 7.300 7.150 7.050 03-09-91 6.900 1,200,000. 1,420,000. 50,000. 100,000. 04-08-91 7.400 1,200,000. 7,693.33 8,831.61 322.99 7,776.20 Total Invested $3,970,000. $ 24,624.13 CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: PLANNING COMMISSION TRANSMITTAL TO CITY COUNCIL January 22, 1991 SUBJECT: Change of Zone 23-90 Ordinance 927 APPLICANT: DESCRIPTION Daniel Hollingsworth 26550 Pabesu Road Menifee Valley, CA 92355 (714) 979-9009 A proposed pre -annexation zone change of approximately .94 acres from R-1, Single Family to C-2, General Commercial located 600' east of Sanderson Avenue 1,321' south of Cottonwood Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt Ordinance 927 approving Change of Zone 23-90, subject to Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration. STAFF COMMENTS: None STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Hixson and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: December 7, 1990 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CHANGE OF ZONE 23-90 APPLICANT: DANIEL HOLLINGSWORTH 26550 Pabesu Road Menifee Valley, CA 92355 (714) 979-9009 ENGINEER: UNLAND & ASSOCIATES 41640 E. Florida Avenue, Suite C Hemet, CA 92344 (714) 652-5575 DESCRIPTION A proposed pre -annexation zone change of approximately .94 acres from R-1, Single Family to C-2, General Commercial located 600' east of Sanderson Avenue 1321' south of Cottonwood Avenue. EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT "B" EXHIBIT "C" EXHIBIT "D" EXHIBIT "E" EXISTING ZONING EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING USES CIRCULATION ELEMENT PROPOSED ZONING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The subject property is not located within a known "A" flood zone. The subject property is not within a seismic study zone. Utilities are available to the serve site with mainline extensions. On one major street, Sanderson Avenue, will serve as access to the subject property. The property is in the range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. PLANNING {i MISSION DT CEMBER 1. , e.990 PAGE NO. DISCUSSION The existing General Plan for the area is Community Commercial and Low Density Residential. Current zoning consists of R-1, Single Family. Surrounding adjacent zoning consists of R-1, Single Family and C-2, General Commercial. The subject property is within Annexation #65 which was approved by LAFCO on December 6, 1990. A C-2, General Commercial zone designation exists from Sanderson Avenue to 660east of the centerline of Sanderson Avenue. R-1, Single Family zoning exists on the remainder of the subject property. The property as proposed under the Tentative Parcel Map 26638 is inconsistent with current zoning. Tentative Tract 26636 has been designed to align with the previously approved residential tract Tentative Tract 26118 to the north. This tract alignment does not match the zoning line. Change of Zone 21-90 eliminated this problem to the north. The applicant proposes a change of zone from R-1, Single Family to C- 2, General Commercial consistent with the proposed parcel map. The site is currently vacant and is surrounded by vacant areas. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 90- 96 recommending the City Council approve Change of Zone 23-90 as shown on Exhibit "E", subject to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration. Brian McNabb Director of Community Development PLANNING COMM ON DECEMEER 12, 1990 PAGE NO. 2 FINDINGS OF FACT CZ 23-90 1. The subject property of CZ 23-90 is not located within a seismic study zone. 2. CZ 23-90 is not within an "A" Floodzone. 3. Utilities are available to the subject site with mainline extensions. 4. The property is in the range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. 5. The subject property is vacant. Surrounding adjacent uses consist of vacant uses. 6. Sanderson Avenue is designated as a 134' Urban Arterial Roadway. Discussion of a 50' scenic easement is also being considered for Sanderson Avenue. 7. The existing General Plan is Community Commercial and Low Density Residential. 8. Existing zoning is R-1, Single Family Residential. Proposed zoning is C-2, General Commercial. PLANNING COMMISSION •DECEMBER 1990 PAGE O. 3 - CO ONWOOD AVENUE 9; I -: SEVENTH STREET 7-1 N C1-1 COTTONWOOD l.VENuE VICINITY MAP T S 'Community P. iv:. •-)11C-.) - Commerc Comniunity Commercia Community Commercial 1271 95. 20' 30 ivy 2 38 37 36 1,99 35 .20' 3' S.C° TE NT. TRACT ND' 1'1 26118 !1avALD4saity Resideptial-- - 60010. \ 695' 0' tr.' 110 3 5 67 3+ 30 69 TO' *05 4 15 2 i7 I2,2' 10 60' -Resmienit 110 2 13 07' 12 6 2 1 CO° 0 "0 11 10 0 t C.0 21 9 ‘0, 6 ‘05. EXHIBIT "A" EXISTING GENERAL PLAN I'l 26636 TPM 26638 CZ 23-90 b 7 .0', +0 100' 1 8 22 23 GO!' t• 1 29 ;6 I 2 9 +-3 2 7 t 1 1 t++. i 67: 1E7 5' . • — COO Low Density SC ALE C7.9 67!. 26 f+r; 25 67 !‘°. esidential 100' C:.7 5' 675 24 c& F • --% [1 24738 • Low Density Residential - - - 0077016,9000 AVENUE VICINITY MAP N. T. S FM, J2) 64 fl C-2, General Commerci41 / 127195' t.1) TENT TH ACT NO, ! 6•7- . 1 t 120' 0 33 120. 36 120' )7 J202 6.6 3C 35 ;?0. 6 34 26- 4/ 30 I s: 609 90' 7. 14 16 ;7 Ito; dkl 29 9., 28 .0 I I 6 5' 0 60' nfe 13 4, 9; •0 1;ov a ttr to C05. 7 10 0' 21 22° 60I 8 6. 23 6,2 0 R71. Sal le 1-arnily .3tr.: fir i; 27 O 26 t; 25 t; 24 67 4' 67 5' 27 9. 2 EXHIBIT "B" EXISTING ZONING TY 26636 TPM 26638 CZ 23-90 __J 4 SEVENTH STREET • SCALE t60 " • too' COTTONWOOD AVENUE 'Tor Roadway SEVENTH $ VICIN TY MAP N. 0.0 condary Roadway 44/ 127195'' 17 120' 20° 39 t1 -rE. No, 1 . • I it! II , I 10' 61,40.$0' er• 213 3 4 120 /1. r33 30 t 12'5' • 37 14 )7rr 36 ,zo• 35 t 4 °20' — 1 34 3 . SCALE 12 60' u ciwayi 15 16 iT 4. 70 I I 13 12 3 19 6. 9: 29 ;9=1 20 GT t E00 0 t• 471 EXHIBIT "C" EXISTING CIRCULATION ET 11 26636 TPM 26638 CZ 23-90 as. 7 g 00' 1 - i : ',par — 11 ,;',) 0 ••-• ;3! 21 0' 22 .32 23 CO. cal Roadway C7547,. 575 27 t:2 26 t f I° G, o 25 0 24 C71 ( -L 13 1 "of COT TOrw000 AVENUE o A I / / ),,"/. COT i Ove009 AVENUE ( SITE 111 ,.. c f., .., 5 TAF E 1' SEvENTe 0 es z . :, z.vEri.J..e VICINITY MAP T, 65e 95 Vacant" Vacant TRACT -,.. - -1 1 I- i•/ \ . I 1271 95' I i ,l4,71 ftt 600 .50n \ ( --,... \ ---)--, I 6 izof 1 ie. 655\e.7 fr.; tiot.' e3 9 20' lb , b 2b 3 •i fe EXHIBIT "D" EXISTING USES TT 26636 TPM 26638 CZ 23-90 39 izof 36 37 3G 35 3-3 70. T. — --$ • feff+' 60° acan 1ff)* ,„ 14 ;1"":3 13 16 i7 12 19 (0' .Vacant'''_ _II • po. I 5, 0 5. 4,1 10 21 9 60' ‘09' ;09' 22 23 6 I 6', 3, .41 30 ki 28 I 1 i art .5' 27 1.6 .7,, 26 ,2 6T 5' 25 (*,• 675' 24 1, Vacant SEVENTH 57 rz. 600 Vacant SCALE 100' 2 C0TT0N.N001 AVENUE 6Y‘ St' 254 VIC1N TY MAP 22 T.5 127 95' 60' 0-1 '0 120 20' _J 0 20' 3 0 37 36 ,r 35 22 1201 34 "0 6 ' -rENT, -rvo\c-r N o. 122 0. 14 16 i7 600 Pe 655 _4 3 70 0 13 0 , 12 20 1 r ',11Lr s I 2 28 60' 0' 1 5' 4 5 422 0; lo 0 % 21 11"- 50. 27 e1 9' 07.5. 26 62 5. EXHIBIT "E" PROPOSED ZONING CZ 23-90 0 5 • 0 7 .00' 22 ° 60. EC" is. 675' 25 9 24 t7 5' ET .2 L - • - se0.ENTH S71723.T SCALE E 00 • leo' 1 2 4 6 7 8 9 10 1.1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 3 ORDINANCE NO. 927 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 23-90 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO T}IE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1, That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby amended by adding thereto Change of Zone 23-90 as herein set forth. Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the City of San Jacinto shown on the attached map marked Exhibit "A" made a part hereof, is !;ereby established as C-2, General Commercial. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 22nd day of January 1991. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 1991 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 3911 CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. 927 duly adopted.by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular mewing thereof held the day of 1991. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of 1991. City Clerk COT 70,47/000 AVENUE • , c Ti.- i. COT SONw000 LYSTitiC .,.‘" i i SITE ... 11; ,.. t; 5:FECT Stvfnl•T I in S :4 i is (T.:01_4'.0.'SC I INCill/C C.: A N!, 1'11 1 I C.J 1 SEVENTH STREET VICINITY MAP 7. T. IZZI 99. 60' co c;f 10 7 IS 20' 39 ,42 710 38 0 TENT. TRACT' NC), 7- 0 37 •. 14 IrY 36 35 1204 a • 31 •15/ 30 gi ; , • 4 16 izs• 17 OCT SCAL J / \ \ — too 0ci' 655 6. V 7 3 13 '0 9 (Si 2 0:no; 5 EXHIBIT "A" PROPOSED ZONING CZ 23-90 1 i 7 — I los' I T._ 2 is o - i 'Sy 05. US' 4 27 ET 5. 0l n. 40' CO. 21 P 63 47.7 26 0 47 9' • o o ' 25 LT 9. 0 23 60' 675 4 7. THOMAS M. COX J Ar4 CS A_CCX SEVERLY M. CAMPER Nancy Randolph City of San Jacinto P.O. Box 488 San Jacinto, CA 92383 CONFIDENTIAL Dear Nancy, COX, COX & CAMPER RROFESsIONAL COR PORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 805 EAST FLOR4DA AVC N1JE HEMET, CALIFORNIA 92343 January 21, 1991 T E LEFH9 RE 714 ti Liit��^ 652-1400 FAX (714) 652 -3990 Re: Govt Tort Claim Claimant: Kesselmark Claim Reed: 1/7/91 Claim Amended: 1/15/91 After my notice of insufficiency, the claimant has filed an amended claim. This matter should be placed on the next Council agenda with my recommendation for rejection. This claim involves damages supposedly caused by an open trench for work done on Idyllwild Drive last July. If this work was done by a contractor, there may be an indemnification provision in the contract. Perhaps Brian or Rick have information on this. If so, this information should be relayed to the contractor's insurers. Could you pass this memo along to Brian and Rick? Thanks. Jim Cox COX, COX & CAMPER THOmAS M. COX JAM L5 A. COX DEvCPILY M. CAMPER Nancy Randolph City of San Jacinto P.O. Box 488 San Jacinto, CA 92383 Dear Nancy, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 505 EAST FLORIDA AVENLIF HEMET, CALIFORNIA 92343 January 10, 1991 TEILEPIIONE AREA CODE 214 652-1400 PAX (714) 652-3990 Re: Govt Tort Claim Kesselmark Date Recd: 1/7/91 Incident: 1/17/90 I ahve reviewed the -above -reference claim. Due to a technical deficiency, I have sent a notice of insufficiency to the --taimant. Police records seem to indicate that this is a one vehicle accident. The claimant appears to have come in to the Police department about 9 days after the alleged incident and filed a report of a non -injury accident. Looks bogus to me! Any way, we must allow 15 days for the claimant to amend the claim before we reject it. Plan on placing the matter on the first February meeting agenda with my recommendation of rejection. Thanks. Jim Cox THOMAS M. COX JAMES A. COX BCVERLY M. CAMPER To: COX, COX & CAMPER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 805 EAST FLORIDA AVENUE HEMET, CALIFORNIA 92343 January 10, 1991 NOTICE OF INSUFFICIENCY OF CLAIM JohruuKennedy Kesselmark c/o REGAR & PARKINSON 255 N. El Cielo, Suite 200 Palm Springs, CA 92262-6974 Dear Mr. Kesselmark: TELEPHONE AREA CODE 714 6E2-1400 FAX (714) 652-3990 Re: Govt Tort Claim City of San Jacinto Your claim which was received by the Clerk for the City of San Jacinto on January 7, 1991 failed to comply substantially with certain Government Code sections. It was insufficient for the following reasons: The claim is in violation of Government Code Section 910(f) in that it statesa claimed amount in excess of $10,000. For your information, consult Sections 910, 910.2, 910.4 and 910.8, and other sections of the Government Code pertaining to the filing of claims against a public entity. Due to certain time requirements for filing claims, these deficiencies should be corrected immediately. COX- COX & CAMPER James A. Cox City Attorney City of San Jacinto PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL (Must be attached to Original Document at Time of Filing) Case No. Unassigned I, the undersigned, say: I am a resident of or employed in the County of Riverside, over the age of eighteen (18) years and not a party to the within action or proceeding; that my residence or business address is 805 East Florida Ave., Hemet, CA 92343 California. That on the 10th day of January , 19 91, I served a copy of the paper to which this proof of service by mail is attached, NOTICE OF INSUFFICIENCY OF CLAIM by depositing said copy enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage hereon fully prepaid, in the United States Postal Service mail box at the City of Hemet , California, addressed as follows: John Kennedy Kesselmark c/o REGAR & PARKINSON 255 N. El Cielo, Suite 200 Palm Springs, CA 92262-6974 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the fore- going is true and correct. Executed on '�anuar} 10 19 g at 1iel� t Cali rnia. James A. Cox Pring or Type Name of Declarant. (Signatur 1 2 3 REC:AR & PA R KINSON 255 N. EL CIELO, SUITE 200 PALM SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA 92262-6974 (619) 327-1516 FAX (619) 327-3291 5 Attorney for Claimant 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 JOHN KENNEDY KESSELMARK, Claimant, vs. CITY OF SAN JACINTO, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) (SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) City Manager's Office JAN 15 7991 RECEIV D AMENDED CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES [Government Code Section 910] TO THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CITY CLERK: YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that claimant, JOHN KENNEDY KESSELMARK, claims damages from the above -mentioned entity in an amount exceeding the jurisdiction of the Superior Court. The name of the public employee causing claimant's injuries under the described circumstances is not known. All notices or other communications with regard to this claim should be sent to the law firm of Regar & Parkinson, 255 N. El Cielo Rd., Ste. 200, Palm Springs, CA 92262. Claimant, JOHN KENNEDY KESSELMARK, was involved in a solo accident on July 17, 1990. The location of the subject accident .nss oil idyl' .•j _ Dr.., a, westin1 .t , th Tiger L.ne 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 , as more fully set forth in the San Jacinto Police traffic collision report no. 1190206014. On July 17, 1990, at approximately 2300 hrs., the claimant, operating his 1973 Pontiac Firebird, was proceeding westbound on Idyllwild Drive, west of its intersection with Tiger Lane, when claimant encountered an open trench on Idyllwild Drive. Claimant's vehicle struck the trench, became imbedded in the dirt and ultimately struck the abutting asphalt which caused damage to claimant's vehicle, as well as causing personal injuries to the claimant. Claimant alleges that Idyllwild Drive, at the location stated above, was in a dangerous condition because of the unmarked dirt trench located in the westbound lane. The westbound lane had been torn up, leaving a dirt trench running along the direction of Idyllwild Drive. Claimant believes that construction was being performed by Ondo Construction at the accident location. The dangerous condition of public property consisted of the open trench; lack of warning of the trench; lack of proper lighting in the subject area; lack of proper signing of the dangerous condition; and lack of .proper barricades of the trench. The dangerous condition existed for a sufficient period of time for this entity to have remedied this situation. Additionally, the property was in a dangerous condition because of lack of warnings of the dangerous condition constituting a trap to members of the motoring public. This entity knew or should have known, in the exercise of reasonable care, of the existence of dangerous condition. Claimant's injuries consisted of orthopaedic and neurological uries to claimant's cervical and. lumbar a...o Additionally, 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 claimant sustained additional neurological injuries. Claimant has been unable to be gainfully employed since the date of the subject accident. Additionally, claimant has had to incur hospital, medical, nursing and physical therapy expenses exceeding the jurisdiction of the Superior Court. Claimant hereby claims general damages in an amount exceeding the jurisdiction of the Superior Court, plus: Loss of Income - according to proof; Loss of Earning Capacity - according to proof; and Medical Specials - according to proof. Dated: January 11, 1991 REGAR & PARKINSON 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. 1930 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ORDERING FORECLOSURE ACTIONS AUTHORIZING HIRING OF SPECIAL COUNSEL WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California ("City"), has heretofore undertaken proceedings pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913",being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982",being Chapter 2-5 of the Government Code of the State of California and has confirmed assessments and levied special taxes upon lands within Special Assessment District(s) and Community Facilities Districts described in Resolutions of Intention previously adopted for certain improvements, (herein- after collectively referred as the "Assessment District(s)"); and, WHEREAS, said proceedings provided for the issuance of bonds pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets and Hig:u. ys Code of the State of California, and the Community Facilities Act of 1982, and said bonds were previously issued; and, WHEREAS, collection of all assessments and special taxes levied pursuant to said Assessment District(s) proceedings was and is intended to provide for the timely payment of all amounts of principal and interest due and payable pursuant to the terms of the above -referenced bonds; and WHEREAS, certain owners of property within the Assessment District have become delinquent in the payment of said assessments and special taxes, thereby necessitating the institution of foreclosure actions with respect to such parcels NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That it is hereby ordered that all delinquent assessments and special taxes within the Assessment District(s) be collected by an action brought in the Superior Court to foreclose the lien thereof in accordance with Part 14 of Division 10 of the California Streets and Highways Code and applicable provisions of the Community Facilities Act of 1982. This order is made pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 8830(a) and Government Code Section 53356.1. SECTION 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized to retain Special Counsel for the purpose of commencing such foreclosure actions on behalf of the City of San Jacinto. Approved and adopted this 5th day of February, 1991. CITY OF SAN JACINTO ATTEST: L'y: Deputy City Clerk 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 3911 Resolution No. 1930 Page 2 CERTIFICATE The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. 1930 duly adopted by said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date therein set forth. Deputy City Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Henry Garcia, Assistant City Manager February 1, 1991 Bids to Re -Roof Police Facility The Police Department (less the facility re -roofed. In the past existing facility. In order to Staff has solicited three bids. 1. two trailers) needs to have their , rainfall has caused damage to the avoid further damage this winter, The bid results are as follows: Weathertight Roofing Co. 2. Desert Valley Roofing Co. 3. All Weather Roofing $4,670.00 $4,750.00 $6,750.00 Based on the bid results, Staff recommends the City Council award the bid to Weathertight Roofing for an amount not to exceed $4,670.00. Although this work was not anticipated for this fiscal year, a balance of $10,125.00 remains within the capital outlay budget to complete this additional project. As a reminder, the City Council awarded a bid to Desert Valley Roofing to re -roof the Community Center and Fire Department (administration/living quarters only) on December 4, 1990, in the amount of $11,875.00. A total of $22,000 was originally budgeted in the capital outlay for re -roofing purposes. MEMO !•, "`;-=='" TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development SUBJ: ACCEPTANCE OF ROAD DEED FOR RIGHT OF WAY ALONG MAIN STREET DATE: February 1, 1991 Site Plan 90-23, the new children's day care center, was conditioned to provide an additional four (4) feet of dedication along Main Street and that the street be improved to its ultimate right of way. The dedication included in this road deed is in response to the above conditions. Staff recommends the City Council accept the road deed from Allen and Patricia Marie Cunningham and authorize its recordation with the County Recorder's office. Respectfully submitted, BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development 1 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: 2 City of San Jacinto 3 AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: 4 P. O. Box 488 5 San Jacinto, CA 92383 6 7 ROAD DEED 8 9 10 FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt is hereby acknowledged, 11 ALLEN CUNNINGHAM and PATRICIA MARIE CUNNINGHAM, husband and wife as joint 12 tenants, hereby GRANT(S) to the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, A MUNICIPAL 13 CORPORATION, an easement for public road and public utility purposes in 14 the following described real property in the City of San Jacinto, County 15 of Riverside, State of California: 16 17 18 SEE EXHIBIT "A" 19 AND 20 EXHIBIT "B" 21 22 23 Together with the right to enter upon and to pass and repass over and 24 along said easement and right of way and to deposit tools, implements, 25 and other materials thereon, by said City, its officers, agents, and 26 employees, and by any contractor, his agents and employees, engaged by 27 said City, whenever necessary for the purposes above set forth. 28 29 It is understood that each undersigned grantor grants only that portion 30 of the above described land in which said grantor has an interest. 31 32 33 frG�.u-w,�L/4vt.�.. 1/24/91 34 Allen._1Cunni ngham- Date 35 37 .:l G t. )C�- c� t %! tcj,t 1/24/91 38 39 Patricia Marie Cunningham Date 40 41 This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the 42 Deed dated from ALLEN CUNNINGHAM and PATRICIA MARIE 43 CUNNINGHAM to the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION and/or 44 Governmental Agency, is hereby accepted by order of the City council on 45 , and the Grantee consents to the recordation 46 thereof by its duly authorized officer. 47 48 49 50 GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of }SS. 3 CTFlCia.tt^TARY CFAT lf. iE Publk — CoYfprnie Fill CGf)E Cf:AtTi TY M Comm FrJLm.i OCT 16.159c 0n this the (7/ day o - f->=r i.r. 19�/ before me. the undersigned Notary Puhlicbperson.tlly appeared ��.-•,,•�-•�zu-ah..c�.-�__Cs�r�J i/�i .l 2r /.G� / iJ personally known to me 0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names) within instrument, instrument, and acknowledged that WITNESS my hand and official -sea?. r rr2. scribed us dt _executed ii EXHIBIT "A" That portion of Lot 1 and Lot 16 of the Miraflora Sub- division as shown by map on file in Book 21, Page 77 of Maps, Records of Riverside County, California, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Lot 1; Thence North 89° 56' 00" West along the Northerly line of said Lot 1 and said Lot 16, 250.05' to a point, said point being the Northwest corner of the Easterly 60.00 feet of said Lot 16; Thence South 00° 00' 08" East along the Westerly line of the Easterly 60.00 feet of said Lot 16, 4.00 feet; Thence North 89° 56' 00" West 227.07 feet; Thence South 44° 57' 55" East 32.51 feet to a point on the Easterly line of said Lot 1; Thence North 00° 00' 10" East 26.97 feet to the point of beginning. 4), �, ,':.,\ EXA 'c, `:' \\ CJ .y a- '3 \ ��I 9- 3 B.S42/) Ayr. 301 0 1-X/PL-3/7- / 3chao /14,41A1 Tiek T 6 sa-3-59'zi"r I 10.o 1-` /-; rj I ' .44to.as' 7.07' +4° 57' 514 32.61‘ • /\ r 111 Q N 50 04 6- 190.001 MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: February 1, 1991 SUBJ: SOURCE REDUCIION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WAS LE ELEMENT Assembly Bill 939 spe:;fically requires each city and county to develop a Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE) within their jurisdictions. SRRE documents must address the mandated requirements of 25% waste diversion from landfills by 1995 and 50% diversion by 2000. The HHWE document must address how the City of San Jacinto will collect, treat and dispose of hazardous wastes within the city. The deadline for the preparation of SRRE and HHWE documents is July 1, 1991. The Source Reduction and Recycling Elements (SRRE) are required to contain at least all of the following components: waste characterization, source reduction, recycling, composting, solid waste facilities, education and public information, funding, special waste, household hazardous waste. The household hazardous waste portion was eliminated from the SRRE and required to be a separate element known as the Household Hazardous Waste Element or HHWE. These documents will address the waste generated within the City of San Jacinto and then policies and programs for recycling, diversion and disposal of the waste. All city source reduction and recycling elements are submitted to the County and shall be included within the County Integrated Waste Management Plan. The City of Moreno Valley and the City of Banning recently sent out Requests for Proposals to several waste management consultants. As all cities in the State of California are required to complete the SRRE and HHWE documents, consultants for the related services are incapable of assuming any more work. Consequently, both the City of Moreno Valley and the City of Banning each received only one response from the consultant list which was Kleinfelder, Inc. Both cities have awarded contracts to Klienfelder for the completion of the subject documents. Kleinfelder, Inc. submitted a proposal to the City of San Jacinto which would address the requirements in a timely manner and consistent with the requirements of AB 939. In discussion with the consultant, Klienfelder is willing to cut 15% from the total if the City is willing to complete certain tasks necessary for an adequate document. They also recommend the 15% be included as contingency if the City can not or does not complete the required tasks. Kleinfelder will provide services for the completion of the City SRRE and HHWE for $42,000 plus the 15% contingency as discussed above. Consultant costs for the completion of the subject documents are similar to those for which the City of Banning has contracted. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council award a contract to Kleinfelder, Inc. for consulting services and the preparation of the required SRRE and HHWE of AB 939 for the specified amount of $42,000 with an additional 15% contingency. Respectfully, BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: February 1, 1991 SUBJECT: Offer to Purchase Park Hill Tank Site from Paragon Homes (required for CFD #2) Proposal for Engineering Services to Design Park Hill Tank and Appurtenances One of the requirements imposed on CFD #2 (Peacock-Radaker) by EMWD is the construction of a four (4) million gallon water storage tank on Park Hill. This tank will supply storage and fire flow in the case of an emergency. Within the bond budget of CFD #2, there are funds for the acquisition, design, and construction of the Park Hill Tank. Any shortfall in the overall CFD budget is typically made up by Peacock-Radaker. In the case of land acquisition, the CFD cannot pay more than the appraised value for the property. Preliminary indications are the acquisition price which Paragon has agreed to accept will be greater than the appraisal. Therefore, the Agreement to purchase includes Peacock-Radaker's obligation to pay the difference. EMWD has reviewed the proposal for engineering services to determine whether it was adequate and reasonable. They have concluded that the design is comprehensive and the price quoted is a reason- able price. Mac Brown, Special Bond Counsel, has also reviewed the documents and found them to be adequate. Staff recommends the Mayor be authorized to execute the offer to purchase, as submitted, and the City Manager be authorized to execute the contract with NBS/Lowry for design services in an amount not to exceed 884,500. Respectfully submitted, /1 Brian K. McNabb nr December 31, 1990 Paragon Homes, Inc. 1448 - 15th Street, Suite 100 P.O. Box 2153 Santa Monica, California 90406 Attn: Mr. Irwin E. Garfield RE: Offer to Purchase Dear Mr. Garfield: In or about April, 1990, the Community Facilities District No. 2 of the City of San Jacinto ("CFD") executed a letter of intent which was also executed by AGRI-EMPIRE, INC., LARRY MINOR and PARAGON HOMES, INC. ("PARAGON") ("Letter of Intent"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. The Letter of Intent expressed the intention of CFD to acquire certain real property and easements for the purposes and upon the terms expressed therein. CFD now wishes to go forward with the purchase, and this letter constitutes an offer to purchase upon the following terms: 1. CFD shall purchase from PARAGON certain real prop- erty tentatively described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto ("Tank Site") for the purpose of placing, constructing and maintaining thereon a water storage tank ("Tank"). The Tank Site is a part of a larger parcel of real property owned by PARAGON, commonly known as "Park Hill," described in the Letter of Intent. 2. PARAGON shall grant to CFD an easement in perpetuity across the Park Hill property owned by PARAGON for the pur- pose of constructing and maintaining an access road to the Tank for maintenance and construction and for the purpose of constructing and maintaining a 24-inch water transmission pipeline and related utilities servicing the Tank ("Ease- ment"). The Easement shall be at least thirty (30) feet wide, and the tentative location of the Easement is shown on Exhibit "C" attached hereto. In addition, the Easement shall include a right to enter on slopes and areas adjacent to the Easement as reasonably required to restore slopes and maintain the Easement. Irwin E. Garfield December 31, 1990 Page 2. 3. The price to be paid by CFD and PR Equities, Ltd. for the Tank Site, and the Easement shall be Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) per acre ("CFD Payment"). At escrow opening, the CFD shall commission an appriasal and will pay only the appraised value. PR Equities, Ltd. will pay the difference between the appraised value and Twenty- five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) times the number of acres in the tank site as determined by the survey referenced in Paragraph 7 below ("PR Payment"). 4. In further partial consideration for this agreement and as a condition to the sale of the Tank Site and the grant of the Easement, CFD shall, at its expense: (a) Locate and grade the Tank Site and the Easement in conformance with a plan approved by PARAGON. (b) Landscape graded slopes and the Tank Site and the Easement to screen the Tank from view from portions of the Park Hill property overlooking the Tank Site. In this connection, a landscape plan will be developed by the CFD, for approval by PARAGON. 5. In connection with the construction of the Tank Site, the Tank and the Easement, PARAGON shall grant an additional temporary easement over portions of the Park Hill property ("Temporary Construction Easement") for the purpose of required grading and slope construction as shown and described in Exhibit "C" attached hereto. The Temporary Construction Easement shall revert to PARAGON upon completion of construction and installation of the Tank and the Ease- ment, or on December 31, 1992, whichever comes first. 6. Escrow for this purchase ("Escrow") shall be opened within five (5) days after acceptance of this offer at Chicago Title Escrow located at 625 Carnegie, Suite 100, San Bernardino, California, or at such other escrow company as may be mutually agreed upon by the parties. 7. Grading and slope construction may require minor slight variations from the legal descriptions of the Tank Site and the Easement. Upon completion of rough grading a survey shall be conducted at CD's expense and the final legal descriptions will be adjusted by an amendment-o the escrow instructions. Irwin E. Garfield December 31, 1990 Page 3. plans have been approved by CFD, PARAGON and public agencies having jurisdiction, (ii) the Tank Site and the Easement have been graded, (iii) the survey referenced in paragraph 7, below, has been completed, and (iv) CFD and PR have deposited the CFD Payment and the PR Payment in Escrow. Upon close of Escrow, the CFD Payment and the PR Payment shall be paid to PARAGON. 9. Upon the close of Escrow, a deed or deeds, in forms acceptable to CFD and suitable for recording, shall be exe- cuted, acknowledged and delivered to CFD, granting the Easement in perpetuity and granting fee simple title to the Tank Site. After execution hereof, CFD and its agents, employees, representatives and contractors shall be permitted access to the Park Hill property for the purpose of conduct- ing surveys and developing grading plans, landscape plans and construction plans for the Tank and the Easement. It is understood that upon acceptance of this offer by PARAGON as provided below, this letter shall become a binding contract and sets forth the entire understanding and agree- ment of the parties relating to the subject matter of this letter. The provisions hereof supersede in all respects the Letter of Intent and any other promises, oral or written agreements or understandings by or among the parties. Upon execution hereof below by PARAGON, the offer described above shall thereby be accepted; and this letter shall there- upon be a binding contract upon the terms described above, and shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2, OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO By: (Signatures continued) Irwin E. Garfield December 31, 1990 Page 4. PR EQUITIES, LTD., a California Limited Partnership By The Peacock Radaker Corpora- tion, a California corpora- tion, its general partner, By: Steven R. Peacock President THE ABOVE OFFER IS HEREBY ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO. PARAGON HOMES, INC., a California corporation Address: 1448 - 15th Street Suite 100 Santa Monica, CA 90406 FAX: (213) 394-6871 By: 132ag117pr r EE 131 ' 91 Or: L)2 PILS/LONR'Y 11 1E7, ca, EXHIBIT "A" P. 2 E N G I N E E R S S PLANNERS H87-041,007 October 17, 1990 Ms. Pam Easter City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92383 SUBJECT; PROPOSAL :'OR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE 4.0 MG PARK HILL TANK, APPURTENANCES, SITE GRADING, AND 24-INCH TRANSMISSION MAIN Dear Pam: NBS/Lowry is pleased to offer our proposal to provide engi- neering services necessary to design and prepare plans and specifications for the Park Hill Tank Site project located south of Park Avenue. This proposal is based on our meeting with EMWD, Dave Cotting- ton, Brian McNabb, and you. It is our understanding that the project consists of designing a site for a new 4.0 million gallon (M) steel tank water storage reservoir. The design will include site grading, access road design, inletand outlet piping, a valve vault, paving, appurtenances, and approximately 1400 1.f. of 24-inch transmission main plan and profile design. The general site layout will be similar to the conceptual grading plan prepared by NBS/Lowry. A specification will be prepared for constructing the tank and transmission main per EMWD standards. We propose to prepare one set of construction plans for this project. The tea for our services on this project will not exceed $84,500. We will bill you on a time and materials basis in accordance with the attached Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates. The following section describes the specific items of work. DESIGN PHASE 1,1 Design Survey NBS/Lowry will provide survey data for the design and prepara- tion of construction drawings. Our work for this task will include the following: 1 boundary Survey r._L' access _cad and tan Once t,_c site is completed,, a final survey may be 1545 West Flnrina . c n n_.. .. FEF, 01 ' 9_ 6S 3 f{LE/LOWRY; =MET. CA EXHIBIT "A" F. . H37-041.007 City of San Jacinto October 17, 1990 Page 2 required. The fee for the final survey is not included in this proposal. Attend one staff meeting with City of San Jacinto and EMWD personnel to plan, organize, and gather essential data and criteria prior to beginning actual survey work, Provide research, field reconnaissance, and data accumula- tion for areas to be surveyed, Establish a systematic network for referenced and identi- fied control points. Control points will be established by ground survey methods at critical points of reference. The control points will include, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Center line intersections, 2. Center line extensions, 3. Recorded curve monuments. 4. Section lines, section 1/4, 1/16 corners where applicable. 5. Planning or alignment locations as directed by EMWD Engineering Department. 6. Property corners with ties. { From available information, determine the street alignment and site improvements for adjacent planned projects which affect the site, including the Park Hill Collection to the north and the Paragon Homes Development to the south. Design survey information which will be shown on the plans will include, but not be limited to the following: 1. Pavement edges and types (existing and proposed). 2. Center lines and sizes of tree trunks (6-inch diameter or larger) . 3, Other improvements such as curb, gutter, sidewalks, fences, landscaping, storm drains, utilities, traffic signals, mailboxes, etc. Contact soils/geotechnical firm selected by the City of San Jacinto and provide coordination for preparRng the reouired will geotec^:;_cal report for cadinq .nd desbearing ari gi c Ypacity corrosion potential seismic g te_ia, blasting requirements, paving 6 FEF ei '91 CP,54 NFE,<LOWRY, _MET', Cfl EXHIBIT "A" P.4 H87-041.007 City of San Jacinto October 17, 1990 Page 3 recommendation, and other pertinent information relative to grading, and tank and appurtenance construction for the site. Once a soils/geotechnical firm is selected, they will submit a separate fee for this work to the City of San Jacinto. R t NSS/Lowry will perform all work necessary to prepare permit applications as directed by the City of San Jacinto and EMWD to include the following: Prepare and furnish to the City of San Jacinto, completed application forms for all permits necessary for construc- tion of the proposed facilities. The City will process and pay fees for the required permits. Identify and coordinate existing and proposed utilities, which may affect the work on this project. on NHS/Lowry will perform all work necessary to design and prepare site grading, paving, drainage, construction plans, and specifications for the on -site vaiving, piping, and appurtenanc- es associated with the proposed 4.o MG water storage reservoir and 24-inch transmission main under this task, Specific items of work will include the following: Attend two design coordination netinr.T T444-h '7nTr' staff to organize, plan, and design the work and to obtain design criteria essential to prepare plans and specifications. Design on -site valving, piping, and appurtenances in accordance with EMWD standards and reauirements. Design approximately 1400 1.f, of 24-inch transmission main from Park Avenue to the tank site. Design site layout and grading in accordance with EMWD standards and requirements. Tank overflew and drain water, as well as storm drainage, will be accounted for in the site design so as to minimize the impact on adjacent developments. Prepa-re site and grading drawin7s for a new 4.0 MG welded steel tank water storage reservoir site imorovements plan cn 24" x 36" mylar drawing sheets with latest EMWD title FFB Gil ' 91 n3: 54 `:EI'ET., CP F.s EXIIIBIT "A" H87-041.007 City of San Jacinto October 17, 1990 Page 4 hl r.",: c _n„ !n H� col dcaiii:C with Linwv ana City design engi- neering guidelines. The completed set of site improvement and grading plans will consist of the following: 1. Title Sheet. 2. Construction and general note sheet. 3. Grading and site improvement plans. 4. Tank ring wall sections and details. 5. valve vault and retaining wall structural drawings. Construction drawings will be prepared in ink. NBS/Lowry will furnish one set of completed original mylars, which will become the property of EMWD. A set of duplicate mylars will be provided to the City of San Jacinto. Provide City -selected landscape architect with base maps of2 access road and tank site. NBS/Lowry will meet two times with landscape architect to review landscape and irrigation requirements. Additional coordination will be billed on a time and materials basis in accordance with the attached Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates. Prepare specifications for site improvements, grading, tank construction, valving, piping, and appurtenance construc- tion, using EMWD standard specifications. NBS/Lowry will complete a master set of specifications and provide them to the City and EMWD for review. Specifications will consist of the following: 1. Title Sheet. 2. Table of Contents, 3. Notice Inviting Bids. 4. Bidding Sheets. 5. Section SC - Special Conditions, EMWD General Conditions, Standard Specifications, and Drawings will be provided by EMWD and incorporated by NBS/Lowry to complete the specifications. Adjustment.; or clarifications to the Standard Specifications will be a par= cf the SC - Special made p al Conditions section, EE n 1 ' 91 17: 55 EXHIBIT "A" H87-041,007 City of San Jacinto October 17, 1990 Page 5 2. CONSTRUCTION PHASE 2.1 Construction Etakino NBS/Lowry will perform all work necessary to provide construc- tion staking of the approved design project to include the following specific items of work: Provide daylight line stakes at 50-foot intervals for the proposed site grading and access road. • Provide stakes at 25-foot intervals for brow ditches and downdrains. • Provide stakes at 25-foot intervals for a total of 2000. linear feet of water pipe and/or drain pipe. 4 Place a maximum of 5 stakes for the tank ring beam (wall). Provide construction stakes at 25-foot intervals for paving around tank perimeters. Stakes will be provided for center line grade only. Staking for edge of pavement is not included. Prepare and furnish to the City and contractor (2 sets to each) cut sheets for construction staking. CorQr E ± na S ervlces NBS/Lowry can provide the following additional services on a time and materials basis, as required by the City, in prepara- tion of the construction of the ?ark Hill tank site: • Advertisement of bids for the Park Hill tank project. Assist in answering contractor's questions during the bidding process and prepare any addenda. Review the contractor's shop drawings and other required technical submittals. Provide technical support to the City as required by City personnel. Prepare and rEview any chan,ge oder modify t,te ign, project which 7--•EE' 31 '91 55 PES/_CIHREMET, C. F. 7 EXHIBIT "A" HE7-041.007 City of San Jacinto Octcher 17, 1990 Page 6 - DESIGN PHASES 1 AND Completed design drawings and specifications will be reviewed and commented on by EMWD and City start twice each, unless errors or omissions are discovered during the second review. + Work related to EMWD or City -initiated changes in concept, or deviation from the above scope of work outside the control of NBS/Lowry, will be accomplished on a time and materials basis in accordance with the attached Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates. 5. Provide tank dimensions and required ring wall dimensions for earthwork. 6. Provide and pay for corrosion report. • NBS/Lowry will provide one (1) set of construction stakes for the project. Additional or replacement staking will be performed at the request of the City and in me voices separate- ly as extra work on a tiand materials basis in accor- dance with the attached Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates. The specific tank structural design calculations will be prepared by the tank manufacturer. The scope and specifics of this work are based on our past experience in processing with EMWD and does not include special handling such as additional staff review, additional public hearings, inter -agency processing, or additional exhibits. We have not included in the processing, or cur costs, the outside consulting servLces such as geological reports landscaping and irrication pans, architectural exhibits, traffic studies, archaeology reports, environmental impact reports, historical Coordination of the above with construction manager for the City of San Jacinto, S D XCLUSoN • The City and ZMWD will coordinate with and assist NBS/Lowry by providing the following: 1. Acquire necessary rights -of -way for construction. 2. Obtain all necessary permits (forms to be completed by NBS/Lowry). 3. Provide standard specification sheets for inclusion into job specifications, includ ng current earthquake valving requirements. 4. Provide sizes and types of pipe and valves. FEE 01 ' 91 O8 6 f S/LONR` DIET, CP H87-041,007 City of San Jacinto October 17, 1990 Page 7 EXHIBIT "A" studies, special printing, hydrology studies, agency filing fees, permit fees, governmental affairs consulting, or major design changes which may be required by the City of San Jacinto or developer, but which are not anticipated at this time. We have attached an agreement for your signature authorizing us to proceed with this project. If the terms, as noted, meet with your approval, please sign and return the contract package to our office in the enclosed self-addressed envelope. A fully - executed copy will be sent to you. This constitutes an offer of services and this offer expires 45 days from the date of this letter. Work will commence upon receipt of the executed agreement. There will be a 5% increase to any portion of this contract that extends beyond July 1, 1991. Please call if you have any questions or wish to discuss the agreement or project in more detail, We are looking forward to working with you on this project and are prepared to begin immediately, Very truly yours, 17ik Colleen M. Mathews Senior Engineer CMM/MJS/sp Enclosures Michael J. Stearns vice President r EP 91 , 1 I. ,•57 IE ET,, CR F. EXHIBIT "B" 0 ENGINEfliS r Pl4NNEi$ SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES Effective July 1, 1990 OFFICE ENGINEERING/PLANNING Senior Principal ,,,,,,,,,,,,,•,,,,,,,,,,,, $135,00 Principal 115.00 Principal Engineer/Planner ,,,,,, , , , , , , , , , , , , 95.00 Senior Engineer/Planner 8000 Engineer/Planner .... , ... , . , , .. , 65,00 Assistant Engineer/Planner , , , .... , , , , , .. , 50.00 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Principal Engineer/Construction Mgr Senlor Engineer/Construction Mgr , , , , Resident Engineer/Construction Mgr . , As.ctctrnf i'nncMir Nnn F Inspector ...... , , , , .. . DESIGN AND DRAFTING Senior Designer $ 65.00 Designer 601;3 Senior Drafter 55,00 Drafter 45.00 Engineering Technician , 35,00 FIELD . 2,8 x Direct Salary . 2.8 x Direct Salary 2.8 x Direct Salary 05 g. n:___,c_r_ ry . 2.8 x Direct Salary SURVEYING Principal Surveyor $ 90,00 Senior Surveyor 80.00 Supervising Surveyor 70.00 ourvey Technician 45,00 Survey Crew (3 Person) 160.00 Survey Crew (2 Person) 130.00 Travel Time 50% x Crew Rate Mileage (Survey Truck) . . . . .... . . . . . .. . .45/Mile SERVICES AND EXPENSES Systems Analyst/Sr Financial Analyst . , , ..... , $ 85.00 Programmer/Financial Analyst .. , , , , . , , , • . 65.00 Senior Technician• 55.00 Technician .. , .... , .. 45.00 Executive Secretary/Admin Assistant ..... Secretary Word Processor/Clerk/Office Aide ..... . 40.00 35.00 30.00 Computer; Mainframe Connect Time $ 30.00/Hour PC Connect Time ,,,,, , , , , , , , , , , , , , 10.00/Hour Disk Storage (Per 100K) . , .. , , . , , , • , 45,00/Month Reports: ($25,00 Minimum) Lines Printed . .. . .02/Line CPU Time .30/Second In•House Reproduction .10/Copy Mileage .30/Mlle Subsistence ..........................At Cost Other ExpEnses .... Co + 15 o i hi.g rP."cs nr.h d and u•e subject try in,..:masIg euch year due to union bargaining Qgrecment.7 and cost of !!VI ng increceea. N,ANCE CHARGE will : aprriad to any ur.poki bc(once, commenctoo thirtu 130f MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and. Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: February 1, 1991 SUBJ: Change Order No. 5 - Street ImprovementCFD NO. 2 The attached change order reflects the work required because of problems arising during construction as well as City requested upgrades or modifications to the striping and signing and street lighting plans. Item 1 was not a part of the original contract. Items 2 and 3 changed the number of meter services per electrical pedestal. Item 4 was for changes requested by Southern California Edison. Item 5 was due to changes in the street striping and signing plans directed by the traffic engineer. Staff recommends the approval of these change order. Respectfully, 0,‘,„_, 921 BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM:lr PART I - PROCEDURAL DOCUMENTS SECTION 11 CHANGE ORDER Order No. 5 Date: February 1, 1991 Agreement Date: Sheet 1 of 2 AGENCY: City of San Jacinto CFD #2 PROJECT: COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 2, STREET IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTOR: MATICH CORPORATION The following changes are hereby made to the Contract Documents: 1. Esplanade and Hewitt Furnish and install 3" and 4" ducts to pedestal locations for meters servicing signals, street lights and irrigation controller. Lump Sum $12,426.00 2. Commonwealth and Arroyo viejo Furnish and install miscellaneous conduit. Substitute double meter service for single service originally required. Lump Sum $ 2,439.00 3. Esplanade and Villines Change from single to double meter service. Lump Sum $ 1,678.00 4. Changes requested by Southern California Edison Co. $24,794.50 5. Changes due to revisions made to striping and signing plans $13,991.46 CHANGE TO CONTRACT PRICE Original Contract Price $2,432,563.50 Current Contract Price adjusted by $3,104,109.95 Previous Change Order(s) Contract Price due to this Change Order $ 55,328.96 will be increased. New Contract Price including this $3,159,438.91 Change Order CHANGE TO CONTRACT TIME Contract Time will be increase (Calendar Days) Date for Completion of all Work APPROVALS REWIRED Approved by: City of San Jacinto Accepted by: (Date) (Date) Contractor (Date) C Pnd CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SUBJEC I : APPLICANT: DESCRIPTION PLANNING COMMISSION TRANSMI1'IAL 'I'O CITY COUNCIL February 5, 1991 Change of Zone 25-90 RYMCO FRAMING 163 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92383 (714) 654-4454 A proposal for a change of zone form A, Agricultural to R-1, Single Family on approximately 1.04 acres located on the northwest corner of Evans Street and Las Rosas Drive. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt Ordinance 928 approving Change of Zone 25-90 as shown on Exhibit "A" of Ordinance 928, subject to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration. STAFF COMMENTS: None STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Ver Plank and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: January 31, 1991 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CHANGE OF ZONE 25-90 APPLICANT: RYMCO FRAMING 163 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92383 (714) 654-4454 ENGINEER: UNLAND AND ASSOCIATES 41640 E. Florida Avenue Ste. C Hemet, CA 92344 (714) 652-5575 DESCRIPTION A proposal for a change of zone from A, Agricultural to R-1, Single Family on approximately 1.04 acres located on the northwest corner of Evans Street and Los Rosas Drive. EXHIBIT "A" EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT "B" EXISTING ZONING EXHIBIT "C" CURRENT USES EXHIBIT "D" EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT EXHIBIT "E" PROPOSED ZONING EXHIBIT "F" AREA MAP ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The subject property is not located within a known "A" flood zone. The property is within the historic range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. A single family residence exists on the site. The remainder of the site is vacant with agricultural uses and residential areas adjacent to the site. The subject property is not located within a known seismic zone. The nearest zone is approximately one mile east of the site. PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 1 Water and sewer are available, however, extensions will be required to service the subject development. DISCUSSION The existing General Plan for the area is Low Density Residential. Adjacent General Plan designations are Low Density Residential. Current zoning is A, Agricultural. Proposed zoning is R-1, Single Family. The adjacent zoning consists of A, Agricultural and R-1, Single Family. Uses on the site consist of a single family residence with the remainder of the site vacant. The subdivision creates a 13,462 sq. ft. lot for the existing residence. Existing adjacent uses consist of vacant and agricultural uses and Lresidential uses. Potential conflicts between existing and proposed uses may be noise, odor, insects, etc. Development pressures are occurring in as a logical progression into the vicinity of the subject site, however interim development may be exposed to the potential conflicts mentioned above. Access is available to the site from Las Rosas Drive. Evans Street to the south does not directly access any of the property, however will be a primary roadway to the subject property. Both Evans Street and Las Rosas Drive are Collector Roadways. South of the site is the Rancho San Jacinto Specific Plan Phase I development. The site to the east, was changed from R-T, Residential Trailer to R-1, Single Family and is currently developing. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 91- 2 recommending the City Council approve Change of Zone 25-90 as shown on Exhibit "E", L3ubject to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration. Brian' McNabb Director of Community Development PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 2 FINDINGS OF FACT C" 25-90 1. Water and sewer are available, however, extensions will be required to service the subject development. 2. CZ 25-90 is not located within a known seismic zone. 3. CZ 25-90 is not located within a known "A" Flood Zone. 4. The subject site is within the habitat range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. 5. Uses on the site consist of a single family residence with the remainder of the site vacant. Adjacent uses consist of vacant and residential uses. 5. The existing General Plan is Low Density Residential. The existing zoning is A, Agricultural. Proposed zoning is R-1, Single Family Residential. 6. Access to the site is _available from Las Rosas Drive and Evans, both of which are Collector Roadways. PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 3 0 EXHIBIT EXISTING GENERAL PLAN TT. 26729 CZ.25-90 Ow LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL -MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDELI I lAt CD- COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL L.®-- NIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Ci4ARGAR i TA —CAMINO-LOSBAN —)41P.1 SA AVE A —no 5 4F1t6..—Av .^,re "-GAVIN CECIL I A— ) CA 9 'At It2041.. .11 ;EIS /4-Et.71!1- EXHIBIT EXISTING ZONING TT. 26729 CZ.25-90 In 0 3-A - " "-- PO., A 310 AV I 4,3 9 • 3A 6C,4 /A,' .pn EXHIBIT "c' EXISTING USES . TT. 26729 CZ„25-go 0- CID RESIDENTIAL VACANT muLTI-FAMILY M:61 gaz,v1 SC-14e GC' /Ai 4.-/ 7 EXHIBIT 1) EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT TT. 26729 CZ.25- 9 0 O _60'7- GENERAL LOCAL SECONDARY HIGHWAY O SECONDARY H HWAY SECONDARY HIGHWAY O 2'- EXPRESSWAY EXHIBIT 'T PROPOSED ZOrRHC.', TT. 26729 CZ. 2fln - J. EXHIF3IT r AREA MAP TT. 26729 CZ.25-•C-10 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ORDINANCE NO. 928 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 25-90 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby amended by adding thereto'Change of Zone 25-90 as herein set forth. Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the City of San Jacinto shown on the attached map marked Exhibit "A" made a part hereof, is hereby established as R-1, Single Family. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 5th day of February 1991. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 1991 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. 928 duly adopted by the City Council of the city of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of 1991. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of 1991. City Clerk -1- Li (-UA9G491TA EXHIBIT 'V PROPOSED ZOiNINH CZ 5-90 Ordinance 928 PLANNING COMMISSION TRANSMI1 IAL TO CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL MEE 11NG DA1B: February 5, 1991 SUBJECT: Change of Zone 1-91 APPLICANT: ILOG, PRES 350 S. Alessandro San Jacinto, CA 92383 (714) 654-7110 DESCRIPTION A proposal for a change of zone form A, Agricultural to R-1, Single Family on approximately 9.5 acres located on the northeast corner of De Anza Drive and Chase Street. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt Ordinance 929 approving Change of Zone 1-91 as shown on Exhibit "A" of Ordinance 929, subject to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration. STAFF COMMENTS: None STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Ver Plank and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: January 11, 1991 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CHANGE OF ZONE 1-91 APPLICANT: ILOG, PRES 350 S. Alessandro San Jacinto, CA 92383 (714) 654-7110 ENGINEER: JERRY DEHART 41720 Lomas Street Hemet, CA 92344 (714) 658-8406 DESCRIPTION A proposal for change of zone from A, Agricultural to R-1, Single Family on approximately 9.5 acres located on the northeast corner of De Anza Drive and Chase Street. EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT "B" EXHIBIT "C" EXHIBIT "D" EXHIBIT "E" EXHIBIT "F" EXHIBIT "G" ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AREA MAP EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING CURRENT USES EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT PROPOSED CIRCULATION ELEMENT PROPOSED ZONING The subject property is not located within a known "A" flood zone. The property is within the historic range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. The site is vacant with agricultural uses and residential areas adjacent to the site. PLANNING G COMMISSION JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 1 The subject property is not located within a known seismic zone. The nearest zone is approximately one mile southwest of the site. Water and sewer are available, however, extensions will be required to service the subject development. DISCUSSION The existing General Plan for the area is Low Density Residential. Adjacent General Plan designations are Low Density Residential. Current zoning is A, Agricultural. Proposed zoning is R-1, Single Family. The adjacent zoning consists of A, Agricultural and R-1, Single Family. Existing adjacent uses consist of agricultural uses and residential uses. Potential conflicts between existing and proposed uses 77y be noise, odor, insects, etc. The proposed development may be exposed to the potential conflicts mentioned above. Access to the site is available from Chase Street and local street provided by subdivider. The proposed project is within the area of the Northwest Area Conceptual Specific Plan. This proposal is consistent with the proposed land use element and circulation elements of the Northwest Area Plan. The project is not included within the Temporary Open Space Designation of General Plan Amendment 5-90. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 91- 9 recommending the City Council approve Change of Zone 1-91 as shown on Exhibit "G", subject to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration. Brian McNabb Director of Community Development PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 2 FINDINGS OF FACT CZ 1-91 1. Water and sewer are available, however, extensions will be required to service the subject development. 2. Tract CZ 1-91 is not located within a known seismic zone. 3. Tract CZ 1-91 is not located within a known "A" Flood Zone. 4. The subject site is within the habitat range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. 5. The existing General Plan is Low Density Residential. The existing zoning is A, Agricultural. Proposed zoning is R-1, Single Family Residential. 6. Access to the site is available from Chase Street and local street provided by subdivider. PLAIJIIINZG COi1 I SJO!v JANUARY 3F, 199j PAGE NO. EXHIBIT "A" AREA MAY TENTATIVE TRACT 26474 CHANGE OF ZONE 1-91 • Low Density Residential • cs oss C 60 120 Lis 0 6,1 (00 60 w 60 /' ' N 12.9 CP 6 ) CJ c r-s \f,) flu Cfs 12,9 rL 1E:a ) rsz 60 120 \D CJ c"..) PROP LINE CHASE: Low 'Density Residential 4". A, Agricultural 60 C,L. 11)..0 GO rs, W " 60 120 ul PO E cr c) co n) 1Cri 0) PROP TIE N c a • C_) 12 F7 0) ra �-- CHASE Vacant Agricultural \ flC 7 0`• <ID 7) CD GO W GO 60 r"\.) GO 0 120 cr) CO cr CL. 100 OD PROP LINE: cro c, F, a: co C1,-(ASE EXHII311 "E" EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT TENTATIVE TRACT 26474 CHANGE OF ZONE 1-91 EXHIBIT ItF' PROPOSED CIRCULATION ELEMENT TENTATIVE I'RAC1 26474 CHANGE OF ZONE 1-91 2 249 £4N 1ACJNTO ReSERVOIR 1 Lot �zm u.rxxj I ✓ACINTO ,ey cI flteOOOOOO OOO sue Bag 1Of MS Se ♦ h Y 0.i Mt San Jacinto Cc Loc41 St. that Co t_(04 H_ v- 166'1 r 2 CY ti-1. i xla'i cc®t l,114“ Artcnal N_v CCU,' t 0,4=11m Pita GO e. t54:1 .CrC 2S1 • X13^Tuo?_1 -101PPI1op ,99 7iS VI-10 JOLUU rJ 09 4ri cy oat cJ •-.7) ri ‘,() 1:4 oaln aJ. cu 09' 09; 09 09 C..1 • (2) • cu tan "71 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CERTIFICATE 26 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 27 I COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, 28 1 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy 29 of Ordinance No. 929 duly adopted by the City Council of the 30[� City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof meld the day of 1991. ORDINANCE NO. 929 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 1-91 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby amended by adding thereto Change of Zone 1-91 as herein set forth. Section 2. That .the zoning of the property in the City of San Jacinto shown on the attached map marked Exhibit "A" made a part hereof, is hereby established as R-1, Single Family. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 5th day of February 1991. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 1991 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Manor ATTEST: City Clerk 31 32 WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San o this day of 1991. c_ty Clerk tiC Go N c-) 'ti UI co L Cb 1Eft n> 50 ur'C, CI iSt 66' Colicotor Roadway Jan 31,1991. Attention! y Council. All Tribes and Nations Bible Church,which-is under Rev. Wilbur Smith. Is asking perm;isson to present a Christian Ral.ley, to bring The Gospel forth. At Drudin Park, on the corners of Ramona blvd. and Pico Ave. On the 16th day of Peb.1991 at 11;00 am until 4:O0pm We will have a small band, with mic's, -speaker'"s, a key board, electrical guitars and a set of' drum's, we will be getting our power .from a generator.. We are expecting about one hundred people to be there. We would like the city to provide extra trash barrels. Rev. Wilbur Smith,Rev. Frank Franko and Rose m Romero, will he organiz the Raliey and at the Ralley. You can reach Rev. Wilbur Smith_ at (714) 925-90'83 Rev. Frank Franko at (71.4) 849-8314"'and Rose m Romero at (714) 654-4864. (2} j 1D\ , Ava MINUTES San Jacinto City Council and the Council Sitting as the Redevelopment Agency and Industrial Development Authority Regular Adjourned Meeting 5 February 1991 The regular meeting of the San Jacinto City Council, the Council sitting as the Redevelopment Agency and Industrial Development Authority was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Boykin at the Community Center, 625 S. Pico Avenue. Roll Call - Present: Councilmen Boykin, Ford, Hafliger, Leahy and Rose. Staff Members - City Manager Easter, Community Development Director McNabb, Finance Director Vega, Asst. City Manager Garcia, Police Lieutenant Preston, Fire Chief Chadwick, Water Superintendent Townsel, Public Works Superintendent Vryheid and City Attorney Jim Cox. Moment of Silence for Reflection. Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Boykin. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes of January 22, 1991. B. Approval of Warrant Nos. 24207 through 24357 in the amount of $483,090.87 as submitted by the City Manager. C. Treasurer's Report of Time Deposit Registers for January 31, 1991. (Receive and file.) D. Authorization for Staff to execute Memorandum of Understanding between the City of San Jacinto and the San Jacinto Police Officers Association. (Staff recommends approval.) E. Ordinance for Adoption - Ordinance No. 927 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Change of Zone 23-90 amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto. (Planning Commission recommends approval.) F. Claim for damages from John Kennedy Kesselmark. (City Attorney recommends denial.) February 5, 1991 Minutes Page 2 CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont'd) G. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1930 Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, ordering foreclosure actions authorizing hiring of special counsel. (City Attorney recommends approval.) H. Award of Bid to Weathertight Roofing Co. to re -roof the Police Department facility (not to include the modulars) at a cost not to exceed $4,670.00 (Staff recommends approval.) I. Acceptance of Road Deed for right of way along Main Street from Allen and Patricia Marie Cunningham. (Staff recommends acceptance.) J. Award of Contract to Kleinfelder, Inc. for consulting services and preparation of required SRRE and HHWE of AB 939 in the amount of $42,000 with an additional 15% contingency. (Staff recommends approval.) K. CFD #2 - Purchase of Park Hill Tank Site from Paragon Homes and proposal for Engineering Services to design Tank an Appurtenances from NBS/Lowry. (Staff recommends Mayor be authorized to execute the offer to purchase, as submitted, and the City Manager be authorized to execute the contract with NBS/Lowry for design services in an amount not to exceed $84,500.) L. Change Order - CFD #2 Approval of Change Order No. 5 - street improvements Matich Corporation. (Staff recommends approval.) M. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda pursuant to City Attorney. Mayor Boykin asked if anyone on Council had questions on any of the items in the Consent Calendar. Item I-K. Councilman Ford inquired if Kleinfelder was the only firm that gave us a bid. Staff advised that Kleinfelder was the only firm accepting additional work in this area at this time. City Attorney Cox advised that there are no bid requirements for professional services. Item I-J. Councilman Ford inquired what the basis was for the price Paragon is charging Community Facilities District No. 2 for the Park Hill Tank Site. Community Development Director Brian McNabb advised that the price was the same per acre as Paragon Homes paid to purchase the property and the difference in price from the amount budgeted in the CFD #2 would be paid by Peacock-Radaker. 2 February 5, 1991 Minutes Page 3 CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont'd) Item I-L. Councilman Ford questioned the necessity of the change order. Mr. McNabb stated that various plans come together with different contractors performing separate jobs, necessitating a change in the original plans and cost estimates. Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to approve consent calendar items A through M, adopting Resolution No. 1930 and Ordinance No. 927 and waive the readings in full. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Motion carried: 5-0. II PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 17TH Year CDBG (Community Development Block Grant) Funds Asst. City Manager Garcia gave Council an update on the earlier Public meeting held at the Community Center on January 31, 1991. The following is a breakdown of the projects that were presented at the January 31, 1991 meeting to be considered for CDBG funding. 1. Senior Day Care Center requesting $5,000 to help subsidize the Senior Center Day Care costs for the elderly. 2. Valley Restart Shelter requesting $5,000 to develop job training, placement and development programs for the homeless and low to moderate income citizens. 3. The San Jacinto Valley School of the Arts requesting $5,000 for funding salaries, equipment, overhead expenses and possible scholarships. 4. The San Jacinto High School/Student Body requesting $2,500 to purchase computer equipment to provide high school students with extensive college, career and vocational data needed to make short-range and long- range career choices. J. The Community Center Director, Margaret Cameron, requesting $7,500 for construction of an additional room to the existing Center. Mr. McNabb gave additional information as to previous year's use of CDBG Funds and Mr. Garcia advised that only 15% of the funds can be used for public service organizations during the year. February 5, 1991 Minutes Page 4 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont'd) Mayor opened Public Hearing. City Clerk stated that affidavit of publication of public hearing is on file. Collette Salisbury, 901 W. Esplanade, Executive Director, San Jacinto Valley Teen Project requested $6,500 for graffiti abatement. Norman Greene, 28120 State St., Hemet, representing Phoenix House at 280 State St. requested $4,000 for housing start-up costs. Organization provides for the mentally ill and drug dependent. Maya Garcia, 127 Tiger Lane, representing the San Jacinto High School Associated Student Body requested $2,500 for computer hardware and software as stated above at 1/31/91 public hearing. Jeanette Arnquist, 158 N. Taylor, Hemet, representing Valley Restart Center, requested a total of $5,000 - $4,000 for staff salaries and $1,000 for advertising/other expenses. Kevin Spier, 769 S. San Jacinto Avenue, representing San Jacinto Valley School of the Arts, requested $5,000 to allow the school to offer scholarships. Paul Bolding, Riverside Arts Foundation, spoke in support of proposed funds for San Jacinto Valley School of the Arts. Jeanne Adamache, Senior Day Care Center, 625 S. Pico, _ requested $5,000 for the care of the frail and elderly at the day care center. Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development, provided Council with projects for CDBG funding consideration as follows: 1. Replacing water lines in Soboba, Andrews, Vernon and Fifth Street. These lines, of thin wall steel, have leaked 24 times. 2. Supplement the Seventh Street sewer and water project. 3. Install sewer lines on Camino Los Banos and Cecelia. This area is currently served by septic tanks. 4. Resolve drainage problems on the north end of Jordan Avenue at Artesia. 4 February 5, 1991 Minutes Page 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont'd) An additional request for funds came from Margaret Cameron, Community Center Director, for $7,500 for construction of an additional room to the existing Center, presented at the January 31 public meeting. As no one else wished to speak, the Mayor closed the Public Hearing. City Attorney Cox recommended those on the Council with a conflict of interest with one or more of the service groups should abstain on the vote for public service funds distribution and vote on the balance of the funds to be distributed. Motion by Councilman Rose to continue discussion (Public Hearing was closed) of CDBG Block Grant Funds to meeting of February 19, 1991. Seconded by Councilman Ford. Motion carried: 5-0. City Manager Easter asked if Council would like to establish a sub -committee to work with Staff on the recommendations. Mayor Boykin requested Staff pass on the information received during the two public hearings and return to Council for a decision at the February 19 Council meeting. Councilwoman Leahy suggested a committee be established for community and city type concerns. Mayor Boykin recommended that a committee not be formed for a one (1) time only item and that he preferred to make his own decision. City Manager Easter stated that Staff would provide a complete information to Council on the public works projects proposed under CDBG funds, along with the public service requests. 5 February 5, 1991 Minutes Page 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont'd) B. Change of Zone 25-90 Applicant: Rymco Framing Location: northwest corner of Evans Street and Las Rosas Drive. Proposal for a Change of Zone from A, Agricultural to R-1, Single Family on approximately 1.04 acres. Presentation given by Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development, stating that Planning Commission recommends approval. Mayor Boykin opened the Public Hearing. The Clerk stated that affidavit of publication is on file and that no written or verbal communication had been received prior to the public hearing. The Mayor stated he had received a letter prior to the beginning of the meeting from the School District. Jim Unland, Engineer, representing the applicant, was available for any questions Council or Staff might have. Mr. Unland stated that the applicant was proposing an additional five (5) units on the property, while maintaining his own residence there. Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 928 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Change of Zone 25-90 amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto. Motion by Councilman Rose to introduce Ordinance No. 928 to second reading, subject to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration and waive the reading in full. Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 5-0. C. Environmental Impact Assessment and Change of Zone 1-91 Applicant: Pres Ilog Location: 2,000 feet northwest of Young Street Proposal for Change of Zone from A, Agricultural to R-1, Single Family. 6 February 5, 1991 Minutes Page 7 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont'd) Presentation by Mr. McNabb, giving Planning Commission's recommendation of approval. Councilwoman Leahy inquired if the schools receive any funding from the development. Mr. McNabb stated that prior to approval, fees will be mitigated with the City Council. City Manager Easter advised Council that the City Staff and School District are planning to meet on Thursday, February 7, to develop increased communication on alternative financing vehicles. Councilman Hafliger suggests the City not accept full responsibility for school obligation. Mayor Boykin opened the public hearing. The Clerk stated that affidavit of publication is on file and that no written or verbal comments have been received prior to the public hearing. As no one wished to be heard, the Mayor closed the public hearing. Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 929 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Change of Zone 1-91 amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto. Motion by Councilman Rose to introduce Ordinance No. 929 to second reading, subject to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration and waive the reading -in full. Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 5-0. III. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS A. Christian Rally at Drudin Park - Rose Marie Romero, 1310 Evans. Ms. Evans, representing All Nations Bible Church requested authorization for a street rally, including a 4-piece band (Christian music). Motion by Councilwoman Leahy that the request be approved for February 16, 1991, with the recommendations of the Police Department being observed and proof of insurance provided to the City Clerk's Office prior to the event. 7 February 5, 1991 Minutes Page 8 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Cont'd) Seconded by Councilman Hafliger. Motion carried: 5-0. B. Community Awareness Rally - Mistletoe Park - Albert Gonzales, 139 Algona. Mr. Gonzales requesting the use of Mistletoe Park on March 2, 1991, for a rally and collection of donations for sports equipment. Councilman Ford asked if Mr. Gonzales had worked with Valley Wide Recreation District or the School District? Mr. Gonzales stated that the youth he is requesting help for do not feel accepted at Valley Wide, and other such places. Councilman Hafliger suggested that the group work with Valley Wide. Finance Director Anna Vega recommended that Council defer any decision to the meeting of February 19, 1991, to enable the group to secure insurance coverage and set affiliation with a nonprofit organization. City Attorney Cox also suggested that the group of concerned citizens work through Valley Wide. Councilman Hafliger also suggested that there is a possibility of the group working under a service organization. Mayor Boykin asked Mr. .Gonzales if there was any objection with working with the City and poSsibly Valley Wide to alleviate the situation, if possible, and defer to next meeting. Motion by Councilman Rose to continue to 2-19-91. Seconded by Councilman Ford. Motion carried: 5-0. Mayor Boykin acknowledged Bill Hoadley, 32820 Bryant, KWRP Radio Station, who had put in a written request to speak to Council, in which he asked the City to advise the correct pronunciation of San Jacinto, as his station has gotten many requests. 0 February 5, 1991 Minutes Page 9 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Cont'd) C. Yellow Ribbon Proclamation - B.R. Hicks, President, San Jacinto Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Hicks requested the Council issue a proclamation proclaiming February 22, 1991 as "Yellow Ribbon Day". Additionally, the Chamber requested permission to use Hofmann Park for the 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. program. Motion by Councilman Rose to approve the issuance of a proclamation from the City to show support for our military men and women serving in the Persian Gulf and request the Chamber of Commerce to provide proof of insurance and compliance, as required for approval of special events. Seconded by Councilman Ford. Motion carried: 5-0. Mrs. Shirley Riner, 21100 Highway 79, Space 48, brought to the Council's attention the Quandt mining operation near the Country Lake Mobile Home Park and advised that there were 40 or more trucks graveling each way, every day, creating noise and air pollution. She is concerned with the proposal to expand the mining operation. Mr. McNabb advised Council that part of Mr. Quandt's property is within the City limits. Helen Welle, 21100 Highway 79, Space 117, told Council that she objected to the rock crushing by the Quandt operation as it hurt the environment. Danny Ball, 41305 Peyton Place, Hemet, representing his tenants at 553 and 559 San Jacinto Avenue, requested a variance be allowed for the tenants to display their merchandise in front of the building, under an awning, as a City inspector had recently told the tenants they must remove their display to be in compliance with the City's ordinance. Mr. McNabb, Community Development Director, advised that six months ago Council put in an amendment to the Ordinance stating that businesses can have an outdoor display four times a year. Councilwoman Leahy questioned whether consideration on a case -by -case basis could be made. City Attorney Cox advised that special findings would be required for a variance and that enforcement would be a real problem. To revise the ordinance will require an amendment. 9 February 5, 1991 Minutes Page 10 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Cont'd) Councilman Hafliger inquired if the Ordinance allowed items to be displayed with flowers and plants, such as a nursery. Council requested Staff review the ordinance, requesting input from the Business Association. IV. CITY DEPARTMENTS A. Update on the Villas Water Issue - John Townsel, Water Superintendent. Mr. Townsel advised that the bids for the additional water main line on Sombra Way would be received and opened on February 13, with a recommendation presented to Council on February 19. Councilman Hafliger inquired how the formula is determined for length of flushing a line? Mr. Townsel advised that it was done either by mathematical equation or chlorine measurement. Mr. Townsel notified Council that a final report from the Keith Company would be delivered the week of February 11. Councilman Ford inquired if the water table dropping over the last 3-4 years was partially caused from new housing, etc., in the City. Mr. Townsel advised that the table is lower than five years ago, stating that Bath Well is at 233', having dropped 8-10 feet a year. Councilman Rose asked if the new pump will make a difference. Mr. Townsel replied that the new well will produce water of similar quality with iron and manganese content. B. Update on Soboba Springs Mobile Home Park Letter. City Manager Easter advised that she is meeting with Mr. Evans, owner of the mobile home park on February 20, 1991, and will report back to the City Council. C. Update on Claim of Sal Cervantes (continued from 1-22- 91) Public Works Superintendent advised that contact with Mr. Cervantes had been attempted unsuccessfully. City Attorney Cox advised that it appears the City has some liability, but there is a question of how much and without further information from the claimant this cannot be deteLuiined. Therefore, Mr. Cox advised the claim be rejected and Staff continue to work on settlement of claim. Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to reject Claim of Sal Cervantes. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Motion carried: 4-1 (Hafliger voting no). 10 February 5, 1991 Minutes Page 11 V. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/COMMENTS A. Scripps Clinic - Councilman Hafliger addressed his concern that the Clinic might close and suggested the Mayor appoint a committee to approach Scripps in an effort to keep the Clinic open. Councilman Hafliger volunteered to head up the Committee. Motion by Councilman Rose to authorize Councilman Hafliger to form Committee and approach Scripps Clinic for a status update. Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 5-0. B. Bonding of City Treasurer and City Clerk - Councilwoman Leahy advised Council that the two elected offices of City Clerk and City Treasurer, require bonding, pursuant to Government Coded 63507. The minimum bonding for the Clerk being $500 and for the Treasurer $5000. Staff was directed to take necessary action to comply and report back to Council, as needed. Councilwoman Leahy inquired of Lt. Preston if the Department felt joining the We TIP Program was beneficial. Lt. Preston relayed that the department had not participated in the program in the last 24 months and did not feel a great impact on information received by our City. Councilwoman Leahy relayed to Council her concerns and desire to follow-up on Mr. Rebovich's (975 Clover) dissatisfaction with the completed status of his residence. Ms. Leahy suggested the City Attorney spend - one hour with Mr. Rebovich (975 Clover) to attempt to solve his home inspection problems. City Attorney Cox relayed that he had held a meeting with Mr. Rebovich (on City time) and had given Mr. Rebovich suggestions for seeking recourse approximately two months ago. Councilwoman Leahy stated that she planned to continue to look into the situation. 11 February 5, 1991 Minutes Page 12 VI. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Pending Litigation & Property Negotiations Motion by Councilman Ford to go into Executive Session for pending litigation and property negotiations at 10:35 p.m. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Motion carried: 5-0. Motion by Councilman Ford to return to Regular Session at 12:01 a.m. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Motion carried: 5-0. Let the record show that no action was taken as a result of this Executive Session. VII. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to adjourn to February 15, 1991 at 2:00 p.m. for City Council/City Manager Retreat in San Bernardino. Seconded by Councilman Ford. Motion carried 5-0. Meeting adjourned at 12:03 a.m. Approved: Maurice Armster City Clerk 12 Respectfully submitted, Nancy Randolph Deputy City Clerk -', GLCD12 CHECK 24358* 24359* 2436Om 24361* 24362* 24363* 24364* 24365* 24366* 24367* 24368* 24369* 24370w 24371* 24372* 24373* 24374* 24375* 24376* 24377* 24378* 24379* 2438O* 24381* 24382* 24383* 24384 243�5 24386 24387 24388 24389 ?439O 24391 24392 24393 24394 24395 24396 Z4397 Z4398 Z43`9 Z4ell O0 Z44O1 Z44O2 Z44O3 �44O4 Z44O5 Z44O6 �44O7 �44O8 �F S�# JACINTO REGISTER GF AUDIT[D DEMANDS UNITED 'CAL. 'I. A BANK A/C 2O1398 ISSUED TO FIRST INTERSTATE BANK STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST INTERSTATE DANK CITY OF SAN JACIN7O HEALTH NET HEALTH NET BLUE CROSS OF SO, CA, BLUE CROSS OF' 8O^ CA. STANDARB INSv COMPANY COMMUNITY NEWG NETWORK TIM ANDERSON SAN JACINTO TREASURER'-S AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS SILVER & GOLDWASSER CITY OF MORENO VALLEY SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY RIV^ CO" FL081.1 CONTROL PIERRE AZZOLINI U^S, POSTMASTER CITY OF SAN JACINTO STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST INTERSTATE BANK FIRST INTERSTATE BANK RIVERSIDE CO^ EHP^ SO^ CALIFORNIA EDISON L.A.W. PUBLICATIONS BOB WILSON DENNIS LOVE JENNIFER ROYSTER FRANK STEENPORT A-1 LOCK & KEY AACE ADAMSON UNIFORMS ALEXANDER BATTERY CO^ ALPHA BETA E^S, BABCOCK & SDNS BIRMINGHAH~S BLUE RIBBON PLUMBING BOB'S LUMBER C+V,A+G. CA,PEACE OFFlCERS ASSDC CARDLEY MANUFACTURINS COM SER CO^ tOMPLETE BUSINESS SYS, COX & COX CREDIT BUREAU OF CORO�A L.N, CURTISS DJ JOHNSON DESIGN DAMON REFERENCE LAB^ GERALD D. DAVENPORT J^F^ DAVIDSON DESCRIPTION FEI��R�L TAXES STATE TAXES FE�ERAL TAXES ��T PAYROLL INSURANCE IN6URAIN[E~COBRA C8BRA.... REDDING & STEVENS HEALTH INSURANCE LIFE � DISABILITY ADVERTISING .... DISPLAY CQH,�UMER DEPOSITS REPLEHIQH PETTY CASH WORKSHOP~BRIAN MCNABB GASKIN V8 CITY REGISTRATlO#~EDC PAYMENT OF CLAIM ENCROACAMENT PE��IT WINDOW PAINT ---FLAG & RIBBON REI�B�RSE POSTAGE METER NET PAYROLL STATE T�XES SS MEDICARE FEDERAL TAXES CREDIT UNION RELOCATION OF FACILITIES PL/BLICATION�P^D° PUPPY CHOW SPARKY�F,D, REIMBRCA: SCHOOL EXPENSE SC�OOL �EES~CPGA/P^D P3ST 5UPERVISORY�P^D P�DLOCK^MASTER KEY�P^D^ �EMBER��IP 1-JUES~BODLAN �ACE � AOLDER�—P^D^ 8ATTFRI��S—BLDG~ DEPT^ & P^D^ CLEANIAGENTS~P^D. LAB TE�TS SHARPE�� CHATN SAW~PUBLIC WORKS PLUMBINC REPAIR�.... P^D' REDIMIX.... TRAFFIC SAFETY IN LIEU OF DUES SCHOOL—THOMAS & RQYSTER PET L�CENSEQ SERVIC�� & M�INTENANCE~AiJ. DEPTS, CGHPL|TE�/PRINTER`P^D P�OFES�I�NAL SERVICE TRW CH�CKS~P^D^ DEK-1::',D. SP��CE PLANNING DLD POST OFFICE L�BGRATDRY FEES�P.D^ PARK F�[ STUDY~COMMUNITY DEVEL0�MNT ENGINEERING AMOUNT 15,817^53 3482^16 J. 634,7O 91/367.3O 17,754+12 116.42 893°OO 2~858.O0 3,i37~4O 69^OO 30.69 96+08 125.00 19'75O^0O 200°O0 647~51 5OO.0O 30^00 96V5,00 89,674.57 3/647^25 1p683410 16/373+66 2/061,5O 8,875.16 100.0O 31^63 298^33 328.00 255^OO 28^77 25^Cie) 541.55 191.73 23,89 1,17D^08 34^5O 48^33 36^74 1,000^O0 258^0O 89^27 1,O37�32 � 3S,983^1O 3+463^O0 9O^OO 176^57 28O^O0 28.00 2'971^56 9Q0,00 ID D12 JACINTO ~ REGI�TER GF �ODITED DEMANDS PAGE 2 CHECK UNITED CALIFO���I� BA�K A/C 201398 DATE 2/15/91 ISSQED TO 24409 DE BROS BLUE1:4,INTN8 24410 DEPT+-GENERAL SERVICE'_5 24411 DESERT VALLEY ROOFIN6 24412 DEWEY/S ELECTRIC 24413 EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST 24414 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORF^ 24415 SHERM40 24416 FIRE TRUCK SERVICES 24417 1S1 MUNICIPAL DIVISION 24410 GTEL 24419 GTE MOBILE 24420 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 24421 TAMRA GERARD 24422 HACH COMPANY 24423 HEMET DOOR CO^ TNC+ 24424 HEMET HEATING & COOLING 24425 HEMET NEWS 24426 HEMET OIL INC^ 24427 HEMET SUPPLY CO^ 24428 OF QUALITY 24429 R^ GREGORY HOWE CONST, 2443O HUBBS STATIONERY 24431 I+B+M^ CORP, 24432 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 24433 INLAND FOUNDATIDN ENG^I 24434 INTERNATIONAL CDMF, 24435 KID LLY BLUE BOOK 24436 KERN EQUIPT. CO~ 24437 KIT'S CAHERA 24438 LEAGUE OF CALIF~ CITIES 24439 LO#GS DRUG STORE 24440 AMETEK/MC CROMETER DIV^ 24441 MARKMAN^ ARZYNSKl 24442 MARDEN~`SUSCO 24443 MATICH CORPORATION 24444 MISSION UNIFORM SFRVI�E 24445 MOORE RECREATIDN EQPT^ 24446 hUNICIPAL ENG^CONSULTNT 24447 NBS/LOWRY 2444B NATL~FIRE PROT.ASSOC, 24449 NORTGN BATTERY MFG^ CO^ 2445O PACTEL CELLULAR -LA 24451 PAGE- NET 24452 PARAGON PRESS 24453 PARKINSON CONSULTANl 24454 L/�KRY PIERCE PLUMBING 24455 PRESS�ENTERPRISE 24456 PUBLIC PERSONNEL 24457 QUALITY TOOL 74458 QUA5T TREE S[RVICE 24459 RHA DESC�IPlION MYLARS~WAT�R & COMMUNITY DEVELOPHAT P�BLIC�TI0fS-P.D^ COMM, CENTER ELEC^ �[�PAIRS~ P^D^ UTILITI2S FEDERAL EX|�RE5S~P^D^ PRO��ES�IONAL SERVICES REPAIRS TO ENGINE 641 BROOMSWEEPER LEASE MAINTE14�NCE P,D~& COMM. CENTER MDBILE TELEPHONE TEL, COMM, PBINTING SERVICES CHI ... DRINE� PRODUCTS REPAIR PAY DOOR '~F^D^ SUATERLY MAINTENANCE (.)DVERTIGINQ DRUMr� OF OIL - LOBBY WINDOW`P~D+ OFFICE SUPPLIES HTENAHCE C3L�) MIX CQMP(\[�TION TESTING PLAH CHECKS BL;E B�DK-P.D^ P�RTS~�TREET SWEEPER 1 C�SE POLAROID FILM~P°D^ ����J�L DUES~1991 PGLAR�ID �ILM�P^D^ �ATER M[TERS HOUSEL VS S^J^ �TR+ PI�E & SUPPLIES STRE�T IMPROVEMENTS UHIFDRM CLEANING �ELT SE"T-PARKS DEPT EH�I�EERING SERVICES SERVICES C3HI[� D�}OKS~F,D+ B��TTERY�P^D^ CELLi�L��� REHTAL RAIDO PAGERS~P^D^ & F^D^ DOOR H�NGERS~WATER DEPARTMENT SER�lCES~IBM 36 WATER 8UPPLIES LEGAL �DV2RTISING ��IHTE�ANCE WORKER EXAMS TRUCK STORAGE BOXES-WAT[R DEPT~ TRIMMING LAK�SC�PE ARCHITECTURAL i AMOUNT 11^19 257^50 11^O0 927^0O 44^88 13^OO 55943,48 895,64 1p565~25 1^OOO,51 116^42 1,812^O0 151,63 191,51 119~46 300.00 729^31 1,187^72 1tool ,8O B71^98 732^O0 1913^62 188^0O 125°36 945^63 8,792^78 49^00 4i7.26 612°51 2'529.00 26�^O5 884+22 3O1^85 2'885^63 146382^96 555^78 1O4^O5 582^31 36850^37 83^15 116^�5 696^6O 5271^i1 87^74 227^50 35~26 184.03 2O0,00 368^O4 699^49 388,82 G /012 ' `^i�ITJACINTO -^ CHECK 24lei 6O 24461 24462 24463 24464 24465 24466 24467 24468 24469 2447O 24471 24472 24473 24474 24475 24476 24477 24478 34479 2448O 24481 24482 24483 24484 24485 24486 24487 2448%? 24490 24491 24492 244f3 Z4494 UHITED CALIPD��lA BANK A/C 201398 ISSUED TO QWIK.... CODE: RAMONA ANIMAL HAVEN IN� RAPID DATA MIKE READE CHEV^ RIV, CO, FLOOD CONTROL RIV^ CO^ SHERIFF RIVERSIDE COUNTY CO, OF* RIVERSIDE RIV CO. LAW NT COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE SAFETY—KLEEN CORP^ SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM MT. SAN JACINTO COLLEGE CITY OF SAN JACINTO SAN JACINTO ELECTRIC S^J^ WOREKERS' COMP~ SHAFFER PSYL^ INSTITUTE SHARP BUILIIING SUPPLf SMALL ANIMAL HOSPITAL SO CALIFORNIA EDISON SO^ CALIFORNIA GAS CO+ SOLANO PRESS SPARKLETTS STATE WATER RESOURCES STEVE1S AUTO PARTS SWAINS El.ECTRIC MOTOR UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALE U^S^ POSTMAQTER A^ VAN GOETHEN PRINTING CARL �AR|�EN & CO^ WEST PUBLISHING CC, WESTERN NORSE SPEC^ XEROX CORPORATION ZUMAR Payroll ACC0UDt 246,353.89 �ESC��PTIDN DATE 2/15/91 AMOUNT PEHAL CODES—P/D+ 425^83 A�IHALG—JANUARY 1991 284400 �SST^ TAX ROLL 106^51 VEHICLE PARTS—P.D. 499694 PLA� CK FOR LINE E~1 10J,000,00 PB[X�ES��NG FEE—P^D^ 40^00 DUHP SITE 1t295^75 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSPE�TION 1,114^43 MEH9ERQHIP--- STEENPORT 50400 TRHFFIC CITATIONS~P^D^ 1,978404 MAINT, SIGNALS & LIGHTING 434,03 M�CHI�4� SERVICE 228,75 CLIP ON GUTTER BROOM 134~70 DICTIO�ARIES~P,B. 25~24 UTILITY BILLS 306~68 REPLA(T-:: PHOTO TS 267+13 ��EIMf�U��E ACCOUNT 598^00 INI-ERVIEWS~P.D^ 190^00 BUILDIN� SUPPLIES 460,75 E�A�1 INJUR2D DOG 18^0D ;TILITY 9,923^84 �TILITY 3/217^74 BCGK D��ER~REDEVELOPMENT 95^63 MONTI-ILY RENTAL 90,35 RECORDATION 15+00 �EHICLE PARTS 792^73 R£PAIR PUMP PEACOCK WELL 804+41 F�X NgTIFICATIONS 54~OO 4TH CLA�S BULK MAIL^^COMM^ DEVLP^ 400+00 SUBPOEA� SERVICE~P^D 12^78 LOSS ��UA BILLING 92~5O C�LIFO;�#IA CODES�P^[/, & COMM. DEVLP 327^50 BLOOD DRAWS .... P,D, 30^00 DRY IHK^ CARTRIDGE & MAINTENANCE 2^786^39 788^64 FINAL TOTAL 585,895,48 13,440.25 3~920.5l }5,82g.4D 1,;045.74 4,l17.h0 47.81 755.8/ FINAL TOTAL 5585,895.48 J. GF 5AN JACINTO FUND 40^ DESCRIPTION iO 1.4 1.8 i9 �0 �1 !2 Kj �4 � )6 �7 �8 � �1 �2 �5 �6 �7 �8 �9 |1 !2 �3 �5 �7 iO '5 '6 5 1 2 4 6 7 9 FIN���IAL REPOF�T OF ACTIVITY FOR THE PERI8D ENDING 1/31/91 GENERAL FUND SEWER MAINTENANCE & DEVEL0PMEHT WORKMANS COMPENSATION INSURANCE FNB UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE FUND LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND GAS TAX FUND MEASURE A ^ GAS TAX FUND LOCAL TRANSPORATION FUND ART^ tl:3 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY INTEREST FUND PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND HOD - HUD FUND SWIMMING POOL FUND PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT FUND COMMUNIT�f FACILITIEG DISTRICT �1 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT l2 COMMUNITY FACILITIE3 DISTRICT #3 UNDEBGROOND UTILITY FLOOD CONTROL - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION ASSESSMENT DIST^ DEBT SERVICE -COMMUNITY FACLi-ITIES 2 WATER SURCHARQE FUND WATER cAFITAL IMF�OVEMENT WATER FUND TRUST ACCOUNT FUND ASSETS FORFEITURE/EVIDENCE MDNIES PAYROLL FUND SOBOBA PR8JECT FUND SOBOBA DEBT SERVICE LOW -MOD INCOME HOUSING SOBOBA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FUND REDEVELOPMENT DEBT SERVICE FUND LOW-1-MOD S^J~ r�ROJECT RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED~ A00A VSGA FINANCE DIRECTOR REVENUES TO DATE 2,293'205 1OO,614 29,925 114,569 l43,458 48'060 45,377 98,454 352'113 44'67O 9,938 85^�jsD 56,458 1/636'689 17,257 628,784 22 t643 55,505 14,1?56 21,021 46'456 531,311 1'O34,287 88,749 84,487 1.0 624/883 173 8,229,6O1 �����K��� ��'��A����� =- EXPENDITUREc) TO 2,529,732 116�O15 37^985 2,?72 25,814 24,326 89,525 10/6O9 48o815 81,t28 9/283 2U,501 144,184 16,287 18,20O 1,851 1,843,636 29,117 44,574 131'137 1O8'373 i1'675 25O 371,098 868,55O 142,852 1/O00 83,273 513,477 7,325,O38 CASH BALANCE 54,746CR 193�123 280'862 2'772CR 6O4p186 388�788 187'066 37/451 23'60O 201f,556 1t255 352,113 234,O46 89t797CR 4~246CR 300,Q3O 71,343 5~626'467 17/257 64/O2O 1,719�869 65,345 381,879 12,066 2,217,681 261,38S 92*66O 530,,945 643~655 67t483 53,313 4O7p211 21,026 33,658 7�835,737 570/833 3�1'�18 23/668'464 � ` ` CITf OF SAN JACINTO �EVENUE REPORT PERIOD EN�lN� 1/31/91 PAGE 1 ACCOUNT ESTIMATED TO ... DATE NUMDER DESCRIPTION REVENUE REVENUE % GENERAL FUND 10~0110 TAXES CURRENT YEAR SECURED 500'000 274^874 55 1O.... O111 TAXES CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED 20^000 22^099 110 1()~0115 TAXES PRIOR YEARS 30,000 39^641 132 10~0117 PENALTIES 10-0120 SALES AND USE TAXES 920^000 461,325 50 10~0130 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX 8,000 6'817 85 10-0141 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS FRMCHISE 50,00O 298 1 10~~0142 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON FR(-)HCBISE 35,000 495 1 10~0143 CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHI5E 48'000 24t831 52 10-0144 REFUSE FF�ANCHISE 140,000 91^223 65 10~0145 WATER FRANCHISE 46'00O 26^744 58 1O~'O16g BUSINESS LICENSE 114,000 86/269 76 10~0165 PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX 70'000 33'516 48 10~0210 ANIMAL 3,000 l,478 49 10~0212 BICYCLE LICENSES 72 10.... 022O GRADING 1.81000 39107 31 10-0221 BUILDING PERMITS 425'000 231,7O3 55 10~0222 PLUMBING PERMITS 70,Q0O 33^977 49 10-0233 ELECTRICAL PERMITS 75,000 37^078 49 10-0235 MECHANICAL PERMITS 32,000 180.09 57 10-0236 STREET & CURB PERMITS 130,0OO 59�721 46 1O.... 0237 3^0OO 4^375 146 10-0240 PRE -INSPECTION 500 265 53 10~0250 OTHER LICENSES & PERMITS 7'000 4,131 59 i0-0320 OTHER CODE FINES 1O,OOO 1'013 10 1O�O330 FURFEITS AND PENALTIE� LITTER 1O--- 041O INVESTMENT EARNINGS 100/00O 10-0411 INTEREST FROM RDA LOANS 10-0412 I#TEREST~FISCAL AGENT 10.... 0440 LABOR� RENTAL+ EQUIP. ETC. 2,000 342 17 1O~O5Oi SUPPLEMENTAL PROPERTY TAX AB-2345 35'OOO 4,228 12 1O-O5O5 STATE VEHICLE IN LIEU 525/0O0 309/462 59 1O~O5O9 VEHICLE OFF ROAD 270 254 94 10~051O HOMEOWNER/S TAX RELIEF 10,000 8,51O 85 101-0511 LICENSE VERIFICATION 30'000 l6,784 56 10~0513 COACH 32,500 1O.... O515 CIGARETTE TAXES 24400 15,247 62 1O.... O529 P^O.S*Tv 16+000 19/798 124 1O~O53O SPECIAL SUPPL^ STATE �UBi/E��TIQH 10~0567 LEASE~RENTAL CITY 23�000 19,625 85 10~0568 LEASE/RENT 2�000 '0 1O-0590 CETA GRANTS � 1O~O5�5 HIGHWAY CARRIERS IN-6'265 1O~O6O1 ZONING FEE8 35,00O 15'8O2 45 10~0602 ANNEXATION FEE 6�80O 6O 38 1O~06O4 GENERAL PLAN FEES 3'�OO 1,661 55 1O-O6O5 SUBDIVISIQN FEES 55/O0O 36�577 67 1O.... O610 MAPS, PUBLICATIONS. ET2�500 1r721 69 10~O615 SPECIAL POLICING 3,000 3,O27 1O1 1S~O625 SFECIAL FIRE 10'000 1+767 18 �ITY OF SAN JACINTO �E�EHUE REPORT PERIJ� E�D�NS 1/31/9i ACCOUNT ESTIMATED TO .... DATE FAGE 2 GENERAL FUND 10-0630 PLAN CHECKING FEES 275'O0O 197'954 72 1(}`^O635 PL��N STORAGE FE[lS 1O,OOO 6,993 70 10~0640 PLAN CHECKING ENGINEERING 250,000 46/166 18 10^`0645 ENGINEERING FEES 50000 221,914 46 10-0646 ENGINEERING 5,000 10~-0647 FLOOD CONTROL ENGINEERING 5,0O0 15,621 312 10~0650 STREET AND SIDEWALK 10+000 9/443 94 10--0660 WEED AND LOT CLEANING FEES 20,000 26,942 135 10^`0675 SENIOR CITIZENS 6'000 3,240 154 10-0676 SENIOR CITIZENS DONATIONS 2^000 992 50 100701 SALE OF PROPERTY 14,000 11,858 85 10~0720 S��WER PERMITS 20o0OO 1.0,526 53 10~0745CONTRIBUTIONS NON~GOV1,U00 477 48 10--0780 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 2,0O0 900 45 10~0790 OTHER REVENUE 9,0O0 40.23 46 10~0791 MISC. 1^O0O 20 2 1(}^0795 UTILITY COLLECTIONS 889 10~0999 OVER & SHORT 71CR FUND 10 TOTAL 41,3411,970 2,293,205 53 SEWER MAINTENANCE & DEVELOPMENT 14.... O41O INVESTMENT EARNlNGS 14-^(}411 INTEREST FROM RDA LOANS 14^~0720 SEWER PERMITS 14-0730 SEWER MAINTENANCE PEES 14-0790 OTHER REVENUE 14^-0EI90 DONATED ASSETS FUND 14 TOTAL WORKMANS COMPENSATlON INSURANCE F�D 18.... O8O0 WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION 18—O8O5 DIVIDENDS FUND 18 TOTAL UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE FUND 19+0810 UNEMPLOYMENT FUND 19 TOTAL LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND 20-079O OTHER REVENUE, 2Ll IABI�TY IN6, FUND 20 TOTAL GAS TAX FUND 21~041O INVESTMENT EARNINGS 21~O5O6 GAS TAX 2106 21~0507 GAS TAX 2107 21-05O8 GAS TAX 2107^5 21~05O9 VEHICLE OFF ROAD 21�0516 GAS TAX 2105 FUND 21 TOTAL 76/80O 135000 3'O00 214+8OO 33/B63 97 65^855 6O 897 1OO,614 6Q 29t925 29/925 ^ 42,159 5� 36,85� 42 4,OOO 133 5�O94 6°461 114,569 53 [ITf GF ��� JACINTO �EVE��UE REPORT PERIOD E�DI#� 1/31/91 PAGE 3 ACCDUNT ESTIMATED TO ---- DATE NUMBER DESCRIPTION REVENUE REVENUE % MEASURE A � GAS TAX FUND TAX INVESTMENT [ARNINGS 22-^0520 MEASURE A — GAS TAX REVENUE 156�000 1439458 92 FUND 22 TOTAL 156^000 143^458 92 LOCAL TRANSPORATION FUND ART° 8 23~0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 23~0550 A�TICLE 8 APPROPRIATION 165,DD0 48tO6O 29 FUND 23 TOTAL 165,000 48~060 29 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 24-0237 STREET & TRAFFIC SIGNSo PER"IIT �EES 1'O0O 3/500 350 24`'0310 VEHICLE CODE FINES 100'0()O 41,877 42 FUND 24 TOTAL 1011000 45^377 45 LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND 25--0110 TAXES CURRENT YEAR SECURED 25-0111 TAXES CURRENT YEAR UNSECURED 25-0115 TAXES PRIOR YEARS 25~0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 25-0501 SUPPLEMENTAL PROPERTY TAX 25^~0510 HOMEOWNER'S TAX RELIEF 25-0565 NON COM^ 0IK TAX 25-0655 LLMD ASSESSMENT 25~0791 MISC^ INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORI_FY 26---- O41O INVESTMENT EARNINGS 26~0790 OTHER REVENUE 26-0991 BOND PROCEEDS FUND 26 TOTAL INTEREST FUND 27^0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS FUND 27 TOTAL PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND 2Q~0670 PARK DEVELOPMENT 28-0680 STATE GRANTG FUND 28 TOTAL- 4 10 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 29~O592 HCD GRANTS 29.... 0791 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE FUND 29 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 31~O110 TAXES CURRENT YEAR SE�b�ED 31~041O INVESTMENT EARNIN�S 160000 16O�00O 3OO,0OO 3OO,O0O 6O�00<} 350,000 35O'OOO 16,996 1,637 2'649 403 546 76,224 48 98^454 62 352/113 117 352/113 117 44,670 74 44~67O ACCOUNT NUMBER SWIM�IN8 31—O720 31`079O 31^0791 31.... O794 31-0795 31~O796 31—O999 �IT� GF SA# JACINTO RE;E�JE REPORT PEF<IOD EH�ING 1/31/91 DE8CRIPTION POOL FUND ADMISSION FEES OTHER REVENUE CONCESSION INCOME - POOL ADMISSIONS POOL LESSONS POOL CONCESSIONS POOL SHORTAGES FUND 31 TOTAL PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT FUND 32.... O673 PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT FUND 32,TOTAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 4-i 35-0110 TAXES CURRENT YEAR SECURED 35~0115 TAXES PRIOR YEARS 35.... O410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 35~0790 OTHER REVENUE FUND 35 TOTAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT t2 36-0110 TAXES CURRENT YEAR SEC��ED 36~0115 TAXES PRIOR YEARS 36.... O41O 36.... O412 36.... O790 INVESTMENT EARNINGS INTEREST FISCAL AGENT OTHER REVENUE FUND 36 TOTAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT �� 37~0110 TAXES CURRENT YEAR SECURED 37-0115 TAXES PRIOR YEARS 37~041() INVESTMENT EARNINGS 37-0790 OTHER REVENUE FUND 37 TOTAL UNDERGROUND UTILITY 38.... O41O INVE8TMENT EARNINGS 38~0880 UNDERGROUNDING FEE FUND 38 TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL 39~0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 39~O422 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS—ST�-H DRAI�S 39-0825 FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVE�ENT FUND 3� TOT�L CAPITAL 4O~0411 4O... O420 4O.... O421 IMPROVEMENT FUND INTEREST FROM RDA LO44,- CAPITAL IMPKOVEMENT5 — STRUCTURE� CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS — E��IPTME�T ESTIMATED REVENUE 13°0OO 4,000 17,000 1O0'0OO 1U0,U00 50,000 TO —DATE REVENUE 4,760 3,64O 1o538 9°938 85°550 45/93O 10,5ZB 561,458 473,468 1,163,221 1'636,689 7/757 9�-50O 17/257 2,436CR 631,22O 628'784 % 28 38 58 e6 86 18^3O6 37 4,336 ACCDUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION CITY GF SAMll JACINTO RE�ENUE PORT PERIOD EMDING 1/31/91 PAGE 5 ESTIMATED TO~DATE REVENUE REVENUE � CAPITAL IMP�OVEMENT FUND 40~0422 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS � e-3TORM DRAINS 40-0423 SI8NALIZATION 4O-0425 SPECIAL STORM BRAIN 40�0992 PROCEEDS FROM LEASE TRAH5ACTIONGS FUND 40 TOTAL 500000 22,643 TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION 41--0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 41~0423 SIGNALIZATION 41-0825 SIGNALIZATION IMPROVEMENiT FUND 41 TOTAL ASSESSMENT DIST^ 42-011O TAXES CURRENT YEAR SECURED 42--- O115 TAXES PRIOR YEARS 42~0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 420790 OTHER REVENUE 42-0791 MISC. 157�000 2O'175 35+33O 55'�05 14^954 2 45 10 FUND 42 TOTAL 157,000 14°956 1O DEBT SERVICE -COMMUNITY FACILITIES 2 43-0110 TAXES CURRENT YEAR SE[iRED 43.... O41O INVESTMENT EARNINGS 43.... 0412 INTEREST FISCAL AGENT 43-0991 PROCEEDS FROM LEASE TRAN�'34)CTIOHC FUND 43 TOTAL WATER SURCHARGE FUND 45~041O ZHVESTME'NT EARNINGS 45~0710 SURCHARGE ASSESSMENT FUND 45 TOTAL WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 47-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 47+0825 WATEK CAPITAL IMPROVEME�T FUND 47 TOTAL 35^0OO 35,O0O 35'O00 35�000 21/021 60 21.O21 60 46,456 133 46'456 133 WATER FUN[ 50-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 5O~O82O WATER DEPARTMENT REVE�i0�� 22,000 34,56S 157 5O~O825 WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEME�T ' ^ 5O.... O89O DO#ATEB ASSETS 5O--- O910 WATER COLLECTIONS 720/000 495/543 69 5O.... O97O TURN (.INS 3/O00 1+200 40 FUND 50 TOTAL 745'000 531'311 71 TRUST ACCOUNT FUND 65~O865 MISCELLANEOUS 354,462 65.... 08&6 ANNEXATION FEES 65-O867 CJNSUMER DEPOSITS 25,765 CITY OF SA� JACINTO REVEHUE [�EPORT PERIOD BYDIHG 1/31/91 ACCOUNT ESTIMATED TO~~DATE NUHBER DESCRIPTION REVE�UE REVENUE % TRUST ACCOUNT FUND 65-0868 S M I P FEES 20 65~0869 REFUSE COLLECTIONS 443'827 65-0870 EMWD COLLECTIONS 203'633 65.... 0Q73 PERMIT TO OPERATE --STATE FEE 3/950 FUND 65 TOTAL 1~O34*287 ASSETS FORFEITURE/EVIDENCE MONIES 66---- 0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 66�0800 CITY'S ADJUDICATED MONIES 66`-0887 UNADJUDICATED MONIES 66�0888 REIMBURSEMENT -CO^ OF RIY+ &. HEMET FUND 66 TOTAL 801-:OBA PROJECT FUND 91^0405 TAX INCREMENT 91~0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 91~0790 OTHER REVENUE 91~O990 PROCEEDS FROM LOANS FUND 91 TOTAL SOBOBA DEBT SERVICE 92~O4O5 92.... O41O INVESTMENT 11ARNINGS FUND 92 TOTAL LOW -MOD INCOME HOUSIN8 SOBOBA 94-0405 TAX INCREMENT 94~041O INVESTMENT EARNINGS FUND 94 TOTAL REDEVELOPME#T PROJECT FUND 96-0405 TAX INCREMENT 96-0410 INVESTMENT EARNINGS 96.... O412 INTEREST FISCAL AGENT 960610 MAPS^ PUBLICATIONS^ ETC^ 96�0790 PROCEEDS FROM LEASE TRAN3/1CTID��� 96-^�99O PROCEEDS FROM LOANS 96~0991 BOND PROCEEDS FUND 96 TOTAL REDEVELOPMENT DEBT SERV10E FUND 97~04O5 TAX INCREMENT 97^0410 INVESTMENT EARNINQS 97-O412 INTEREST FISCAL AGENT 97~~0991 PROCEEDS FROM LEASE TR�#S�CTIOH� FUND 97 TUTAL LOW~MOD INCOME HOUSING S^J� PRO-ji�I� 99~0405 FAX INCREMENT 99~O41O INVESTMENT EARNINGS FUNB 99 TOTAL 110,00D 11O/0O0 66O,O0O 660,000 78r547 1U202 88,749 84,487 77 84'487 77 1O 1O 437f,568 66 187�315 624,883 173 95 LEDGER TOTAL 7,902/770 8/229'6O1 104 ACCOUNT DEPART A!: 'r N.T.. GENERAL FUND 1.0-:I.1.00 CITY COUNCIL. 10--1'200 10--1.300 1.0--1400 :L 0-1.500 10-L600 :LO-1 700 10--:L 900 10--2200 10--2230 :I.0--2250 :L O--2400 i.0--2500 10-'31. 00 10 -•3200 :L 0.-.3300 1.0-•-340() :1.0-3500 .I.0--3600 10- 41.00 10--4150 10-4200 1.0-•4400 10-4550 10-•'5100 1.0-6100 1.0--7100 10...-7LS00 CITY OF SAN JACINTO EXPENDITURE REPORT 1'CORTT-. PERIOD ENDING 1/'31/91 APPROPRIATION EXPENDITURES CITY MANAGER CITY CLERK; FINANCE TREASURER CITY ATTORNEY PLANNING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GENERAL GOVERNMENT CIVIC CENTER INSURANCE N/ri FIRE INSURANCE & BLANKET BONDS N/Li PERSONNEL ANNEXATION N/I' NON -DEPARTMENTAL PAf<TT~TL::NTAL_ POLICE FIRE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING PUBLIC SERVICES ANIMAL- REGULATIONS PUBLIC SERVICES EMERGENCY SERVICES PUBLIC SAFETY .-° COMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING ArtMIN PUBLIC WORKS CORPORATION YARD PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAINTENANCE PUBLIC WORKS STREET CLEANING PUBLIC WORKS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE (3E::NI-:RAL GOVERNMENTAL HEALTH SERVICE PUBLIC SERVICE: MUSEUM PUBLIC WORKS PARKS PUBLIC SERVICES COMMUNITY CENTER FtJ' 1) :L0 TOTAL S EWER MAINTENANCE & DEVELOPMENT 14»-4600 PUBLIC WORKS SE:L,!EF: TRANSMISSION MNT :1.4-4610 I...IFT STATION F'UNt' 14 TOTAL WORT<:MANS COMPENSATION INSURANCE END le- .'.350 W0F:KMAN'5 COMPENSATION N/,.. FUND 1e TOTAL.. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE FUND 19--2:150 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION FUND 1.9 TOTAL LJ:Ai :!:L.ITY NSl.II:A(lCT::: FUND 20- 200 INSURANCE :: N /T:) FUND :20 TOTAL GAS TAX i:: UNIT 21-821.0 PUBLIC WORKS STREET MAJFUND 21 TOM.' :N'T`. N/Il C,-,N8- 19,470 98,010 13,375 1070948 035 32,800 260,288 34,380 36,6:1.0 62,593 6,000 14,950 1,959,59:1. 761,738 260,870 39,306 8,250 210,957 29,040 114,096 104,178 39,082 70,692 1,000 8,390 39,517 78,096 4,412,878 :L17,458 117,458 97,000 97,000 6,000 6,000 37,900 357 , 900 375300 10,260 53 64,912 66 19,993 149 29,815 2a 565 68 17,092 52 107,695 41. 53,234 :1.55 74 22,649 62. 2'7,107 43 12,013 177 6,045 40 1,1.70,1.77 60 475,096 62 134,917 21,241. 54 100,136 47 63,254 218 36,234 32y 33,65() :3:., 20,184 52 34,593 49 3,845 46 18,140 46 46,8:L0 60 529,732 57 115,796 218 :I.16,014 iX9 37, 9t:i., .39 37 , 985 39 2 , 77 y 46 2p772 'fir 6 25,8:1..:z 25,314 ?4,376 • ACCOUNT DEFARTMENT CITY OF SA# JACINTO E�FE�DITUR[ REPORT PERIOD E�DIH� 1/31/91 MEASURE A ~ GAS TAX FUND 22�822O STREET IMPROVEMENTS -PUBLIC W0�(� FUND 22 TOTAL APPROPRIATION EXPENDITURES LOCAL TRANSPORATION FUND ART, 8 23~8230 PUBLIC WORKS STREET & HIBHWAY IMPRV FUND 23 TOTAL TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 24-8240 PUBLIC WORKS TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 24 TOTAL LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND 25-8250 PUBLIC WORKS STREET LIGHTIHG M�INT FUND 25 TOTAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AOTHORITY 26-8260 GENERAL GVMT SAFETY & WELFARE FUND 26 TOTAL 719'11500 89^525 12 719'500 89^524 12 196'00O 10*609 5 196'000 10°609 5 85,549 48°815 57 85/549 48,814 57 256,466 810.28 32 256,466 81,128 32 9^283 9,283 pA&K DEVELOPMENT FUND 28-715O PUBLIC WORKS FAKK DEVEL78�500 20,501 26 FUND 28 TOTAL 78,500 20,500 26 HCD - HUQ FUND 29`866O PUBLIC WORKS HOUSING & CDMM77 UHITY DV 348,86 9,800 23 29�8661 DOWNTOWN WATER 64,384 FUND 29 TOTAL 348,786 144~183 41 SWIMMING POOL FUND 31~84OO SWIMMING POOL 2�/925 16�287 68 1-UN0 3l TOTAL 23/925 16,286 68 PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT FUND 3?~725O POBLIC WORKS PARKWAY DEVilLOPMEN� 45000 18,200 40 FUND 32 TOTAL 45^00O 18/2O0 40 COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT �i 35-2500 NON�DEPARTMENTAL FUND 35 TOTAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT �2 36~25OO NON....DEPARTMENTAL 36~�3360 COMMUNITY FACILITIES FUND36 TOTAL COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT �3 37~2500 NON -DEPARTMENTAL FUND 37 TOTAL FLOOD CONTRGL 39-839O DRAINAGE PR�JECT FUND 39 TOTAL 1�851 1t851 1396,719 444,9{7 1843635 28,117 28,116 CITY OF G� JACINTO EXPEHD�Ti�U� REPORT PERIOD ENDI�� 1/31/91 PAGE 3 ACCOUNT DEPARTMEHT APPROPRIATION EXPENDITURES % CAIAL IMPROVEMENT FUND PT 4O~25OO NON` -DEPARTMENTAL 294,100 44,574 15 FUND 40 TOTAL 294/100 44�573 15 ASSESSMENT DIST~ 42... 850O ASSESSMENT DISTFUCT 87-1 157,7O0 95/940 61 42~~85O1 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 9O~1 35,19�y FUND 42 TOTAL 157,700 131,136 83 DEBT SERVICE~COMMUNITY FACILITIES 2 43~2500 NON~DEPARTMENTAL 108,373 FUND 43 TOTAL 1O8,372 WATER SURCHARGE FUND 45.... 9600 WATER TANK LOAN 13,6O0 11,675 86 FUND 45 TOTAL 13,600 11,673 86 WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 47-225O PERSONNEL 47~2500 NON~DEPARTMENTAL 47~9600 WATER TANK LOAN FUND 47 TOTAL WATER FUND 50.... 9OOO WATER PURVEYANCE 50~94()0 DOMESTIC WATER 5O~9402 TRANSMISSION AND DISTRI�OTIDH 50~9404 PUMPING EXPENSES 50~9410 WATER TF�EATMENT AND STORASE 5O-~9474 WATER DEPARTMENT CUST�MER ACC8U�TS 5O.... 96OO WATER T�-)NK LOAN FUND 50 TOTAL TRUST ACCOUNT FUND 65-8650 TRUST FUND CLEARING FUND 65 TOTAL ASSETS FORFEITURE/EVIDENCE MGNIE3 66�O TRUST FUND CLEARING FUND 66 TOTAL SOBOBA PROJECT FUN� 91�97O0 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FUND 91 TOTAL SOBOBA DEBT SERVICE 92.... 97O0 REDEVELDPMENT PRQJECT FUNB 92 TOTAL LOW�M�D INCOME HDUSINQ SOBOBA 94~97OO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FUND 94 TOTAL 629,937 45�60O 45,6OO 19�00O 19,OOO 250 25O 252,174 lot 552 8�486 78^442 30,853 591 371~O97 59 868,55O 868,549 142/852 142,851 1'OOO 1OnV , CITY OF SA# JACINTO EXi:�ENDITURE:' REPORT PERIOD ENDING 1/31/91 PAGE 4 ACCOUNT DEPARTMENT APPROPRIATION EXPENDITURES % REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FUND 96~9700 8EDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 117,009 83/273 71 REDEVELOPMENT DEBT SERVICE FUND 97-9700 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 845,79S 513t477 61 FUND 97 TOTAL 845,795 513,476 61 LQW~MOD INCOME HOUSING S+J, PROJECT 99-9700 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 2B,666 FUND 99 TOTAL 28,666 LEDGER TOTAL 9,271t669 7,325/037 79 CITY COUNCIL MEETING DA I B: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: DESCRIPTION PLANNING COMMISSION TRANSMII`I'AL TO CITY COUNCIL February 5, 1991 Change of Zone 25-90 RYMCO FRAMING 163 E Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92383 (714) 654-4454 A proposal for a, change of zone form A; Agricultural to R-1, Single Family on approximately 1.04 acres located on the northwest corner of Evans Street and Las Rosas Drive. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt Ordinance 928 approving Change of Zone 25-90 as shown on Exhibit "A" of Ordinance 928, subject to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration. STAFF COMMENTS: None STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Ver Plank and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: January 31, 1991 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CHANGE OF ZONE 25-90 APPLICANT: RYMCO FRAMING 163 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92383 (714) 654-4454 ENGINEER: UNLAND AND ASSOCIATES 41640 E. Florida Avenue Ste. C Hemet, CA 92344 (714) 652-5575 DESCRIPTION A proposal for a change of zone from A, Agricultural to R-1, Single Family on approximately 1.04 acres located on the northwest corner of Evans Street and Los Rosas Drive. EXHIBIT "A" EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT "B" EXISTING ZONING EXHIBIT "C" CURRENT USES EXHIBIT "D" EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT EXHIBIT "E" PROPOSED ZONING EXHIBIT "F" AREA MAP ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The subject property is not located within a known "A" flood zone. The property is within the historic range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. A single family residence exists on the site. The remainder of the site is vacant with agricultural uses and residential areas adjacent to the site. The subject property is not located within a known seismic zone. The nearest zone is approximately one mile east of the site. PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 1 Water and sewer are available, however, extensions will be required to service the subject development. DISCUSSION The existing General Plan for the area is Low Density Residential. Adjacent General Plan designations are Low Density Residential. Current zoning is A, Agricultural. Proposed zoning is R-1, Single Family. The adjacent zoning consists of A, Agricultural and R-1, Single Family. Uses on the site consist of a single family residence with the remainder of the site vacant. The subdivision creates a 13,462 sq. ft. lot for the existing residence. Existing adjacent uses consist of vacant and agricultural uses and residential uses. Potential conflicts between existing and proposed uses may be noise, odor, insects, etc. Development pressures are occurring in as a logical progression into the vicinity of the subject site, however interim development may be exposed to the potential conflicts mentioned above. Access is available to the site from Las Rosas Drive. Evans Street to the south does not directly access any of the property, however will be a primary roadway to the subject property. Both Evans Street and Las Rosas Drive are Collector Roadways. South of the site is the Rancho San Jacinto Specific Plan Phase I development. The site to the east, was changed from R-T, Residential Trailer to R-1, Single Family and is currently developing. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 91- 2 recommending the City Council approve Change of Zone 25-90 as shown on Exhibit "E", subject to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration. Bria McNabb Director of Community Development PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 2 FINDINGS OF FACT CZ 25-90 1. Water and sewer are available, however, extensions will be required to service the subject development. 2. CZ 25-90 is not located within a known seismic zone. 3. CZ 25-90 is not located within a known "A" Flood Zone. 4. The subject site is within the habitat range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. 5. Uses on the site consist of a single family residence with the remainder of the site vacant. Adjacent uses consist of vacant and residential uses. 5. The existing General Plan is Low Density Residential. The existing zoning is A, Agricultural. Proposed zoning is R-1, Single Family Residential. 6. Access to the site is available from Las Rosas Drive and Evans, both of which are Collector Roadways. PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 3 /^1 EXHIBIT EXISTING GENERAL PLAN TT. 26729 CZ.25-90 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 0-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL CD -:.COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 0- HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .42-2 Cml.tAR RI TA —CAMINO.LOS"04. ie^/ 1 — Ami14 —MIRAMAR AVE qi CI IA— R ) S AL AM - PL. k ILL0 0 A —A —ROSAR'r6" e.e.• .kozgaci 'VA .5G—.-1.•.:47 /A/ P r EXHIBIT 13• EXISTING ZONING TT. 26729 CZ.25-90 LJ I L__-- .. C-WARCAPITA 41.6 J SJ A C C 0 SALAP- p 4 Al EXHIBIT "p EXISTING USES TT. 26729 CZ.25--0 ___ RESIDENTIAL VACANT MULTI -FAMILY AValct L9A411_11=3....--11 „10 T EXHIBIT '' EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT TT. 26729 CZ.25-90 9 A 2 0 607 GENERAL LOCAL. SECOND A R Y HI GI -I W A SECONDARY HIGHWAY 0_6,0'- SECONDARY HIGHWAY 0142'- EXPRESSWAY [_J Li L___ [ °"'RoP zave LAPV rrz6,7e 1 EXHIBIT 91 PROPOSED zoN1Lci TT, 26729 CZ.25-90 CELLG_ARITA —1:N3A MAR AVE re-242/4, AO $AVO-----AvE C A 41L4s? EXHIBIT "P AREA MAP TT. 26729 CZ.25-90 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ORDINANCE NO. 928 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 25-90 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby amended by adding thereto'Change of Zone 25-90 as herein set forth. Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the City of San Jacinto shown on the attached map marked Exhibit "A" made a part hereof, is hereby established as R-1, Single Family. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 5th day of February 1991. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 1991 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, ATTEST: City Clerk CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. 928 duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of 1991. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of 1991. city Clerk -1- 77 • • I_J —1[ ZeVAi PEA/SerY "Z'C-5/crtsvr.e.44. C-14ASSGAILTA SALAU- yr420-- Va= raaa - 717 EXHIBIT "A" PROPOSED ZONIR CZ 25-90 Ordinance 928 CITY COUNCIL MEETING DAI"L: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: DESCRIPTION PLANNING COMMISSION TRANSMITTAL TO CITY COUNCIL February 5, 1991 Change of Zone 1-91 ILOG, PRES 350 S. Alessandro San Jacinto, CA 92383 (714) 654-7110 A proposal for a change of zone font: A, Agricultural to R-1, Single Finii1y on approximately 9.5 acres located on the northeast corner of De Anza Drive and Chase Street. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt Ordinance 929 approving Change of Zone 1-91 as shown on Exhibit "A" of Ordinance 929, subject to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration. STAFF COMMENTS: None STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Ver Plank and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: January 11, 1991 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CHANGE OF ZONE 1-91 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: DESCRIPTION ILOG, PRES 350 S. Alessandro San Jacinto, CA 92383 (714) 654-7110 JERRY DEHART 41720 Lomas Street Hemet, CA 92344 (714) 658-8406 A proposal for change of zone from A, Agricultural to R-1, Single Family on approximately 9.5 acres located on the northeast corner of De Anza Drive and Chase Street. EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT "B" EXHIBIT "C" EXHIBIT "D" EXHIBIT "E" EXHIBIT "F" EXHIBIT "G" ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS AREA MAP EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING CURRENT USES EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT PROPOSED CIRCULATION ELEMENT PROPOSED ZONING The subject property is not located within a known IlAll flood zone. The property is within the historic range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. The site is- vacant with agricultural uses and residential areas adjacent to the site. PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. The subject property is not located within a known seismic zone. The nearest zone is approximately one mile southwest of the site. Water and sewer are available, however, extensions will be required to service the subject development. DISCUSSION The existing General Plan for the area is Low Density Residential. Adjacent General Plan designations are Low Density Residential. Current zoning is A, Agricultural. Proposed zoning is R-1, Single Family. The adjacent zoning consists of A, Agricultural and R-1, Single Family. Existing adjacent uses consist of agricultural uses and residential uses. Potential conflicts between existing and proposed uses may be noise, odor, insects, etc. The proposed development may be exposed to the potential conflicts mentioned above. Access to the site is available from Chase Street and local street provided by subdivider. The proposed project is within the area of the Northwest Area Conceptual Specific Plan. This proposal is consistent with the proposed land use element and circulation elements of the Northwest Area Plan. The project is not included within the Temporary Open Space Designation of General Plan Amendment 5-90. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 91- 9 recommending the City Council approve Change of Zone 1-91 as shown on Exhibit "G", subject to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration. Brian McNabb Director of Community Development PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 2 FINDINGS OF FACT CZ 1-91 1. Water and sewer are available, however, extensions will be required to service the subject development. 2. Tract CZ 1-91 is not located within a known seismic zone. 3 Tract CZ 1-91 is not located within a known "A" Flood Zone, 4. The subject site is within the habitat range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. 5. The existing General Plan is Low Density Residential. The existing zoning is A, Agricultural. Proposed zoning is R-1, Single Family Residential. 6. Access to the site is available from Chase Street and local street provided by subdivider. PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 3 EXI IIBIT "A" AREA MAP TENTATIVE TRACT 26474 CHANGE OF ZONE 1-91 1 ,/ 4 ", • f?: C-.Z it‘NZ.L.'HIT0. I w. Low Density Residential 10 60 60 0 o OE) n. 120 N • 60 7f. 60 128 12Et na 60 120 C.L. PROP LINO CHASE Low Density Residential A, Agricultural 3. EXHIBIT "C" EXISTING ZONING TENTATIVE 11ZAC1 26474 CHANGE OF ZONE 1-91 A, Agricultural. 72' SS 29 30 !' -, J O O 12 40 7�. 37 (-IC) 15 N 7? 15 6'3 17. 68 i:? 6J 19 E0.- 20 68 21 w :J 72' 22 A, 23 Agriczilturat 24 25 26 27 N 22 2 60 60 60 60 60 O 72_ l i II i 0017o41000 AVENUE., ' r .to A, Agricultural EXHIBIT "D" EXISTING USES TENTATIVE TRAC 126474 CHANGE OF ZONE 1-91 Va ant Agricultural %C. 29 J J ✓'4 50 37 0 l 40 8 0 ._p N is ( 6 ; 1%- 6C 1v 6 19 `1 21 6° CI W al72 72 ` 22 23 Vacant Qricu_tural 4 25 26- 27 Cu 28 l 60 60 60 607°J J 33 PROP LINE Residential Agricultural R esKlen LiaL EXHIBIT "E" EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT TENTATIVE TRACT 26474 CHANGE OF ZONE 1-91 EXHIBIT "F' PROPOSED CIRCULATION ELEMENT TENTATIVE 1'RAC1 26474 CHANGE OF ZONE 1-91 249 Lot l.i..k11,.1 lAcod • nI ecbnd Rd 1 Cy TY 1-00• t/d'ITS Mt. San Jacinto Cc 11 1ii 1 $ 11 I+-11 t1 11 11 11 ____ Ip1 ® local St. (60'1 ® CORectod Hwy. 1661 •...« Secondary Hwy. 188't - Map, Hwy. 1100.1 dltll Urban Arterial H.+r. 1138`, Spec,irc Plan Road 11a.'t 4er..c S•:It:ai B; lr—a s St,.rcr in tv . n:_etoC `-C 120 ‘Ri C) c. C t._ • R.) r:.). L) 120 0-4 R.) crt (1) CO (11 R.) (7' • J.) 120 • 120 • R.) 1").) L) PROP LINT, CHASE: 66' ColleCtor Roadway •••.1 1•12 120 r1 ij 0 0 X ni N H o H z CP2.1-4V /2" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ORDINANCE NO. 929 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 1-91 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby amended by adding thereto Change of Zone 1-91 as herein set forth. Section 2. That .the zoning of the property in the City of San Jacinto shown on the attached map marked Exhibit "A" made a part hereof, is hereby established as R-1, Single Family. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 5th day of February 1991. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 1991 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. 929 duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of 1991. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of 1991. City Clerk ‘',/ .\, , EXHIBIT "A" PROPOSED ZONING CZ 1-91 Ordinance 929 29 <2, 14 13 c2, 12 0 11 122 0 • 4 10 6' 6 6C B 40 0 u ^ C / 15 c-3 c_.. 15 RA., 17. Sin ' le F 19 mily 20 . 21 _ cu 7 p 6 68 60 z-'2 6.8 7e' 22 cr, 23 24 25 cu _ I GC SC gle- amily - - C W Secondary Roadway MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager FROM: Anna Vega, Finance Director64/ DATE: February 19, 1991 SUBJECT: ICMA Deferred Compensation The City of San Jacinto previously contracted with ICMA Retirement. Corporation to administer the City's deferred compensation plan. This action was done on November 25, 1975, Resolution no. 1076, however it was never implemented. Therefore, we currently do not have a deferred compensation program for our employees. All that is required to activate the City's plan is to amend the previeus resolution by adopting the attached resolution_ The amendment will execute ICMA's Retirement Trust which ha E become a part of ICMA's deferred compensation plan. The deferred compensation plan is for employee participation, no City contribution will be made. The only cost to the City is writing- an accounts payable check to ICMA for the total amount of employee contributions made to the plan each month. The .,Lt-eched resolution has been reviewed and approved by the City. Attorney, RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the amendment to Re----;ollition no. 1076, to Include IONA Retirement Trust. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. 1931 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY'S DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN AS PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 1076. WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto desires that the investment of funds held under its deferred compensation plan be administered by the ICMA Retirement Corporation, and that such funds be held by the ICMA Retirement Trust, a trust established by public employers for the collective investment of funds held under their deferred compensation plans and money purchase retirement plans NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of San Jacinto hereby executes the Declaration of Trust of the ICMA Retirement Trust, attached here to as Appendix B. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director of the City of San Jacinto shall be the coordinator for this program and shall receive necessary reports, notices, etc. from the ICMA Retirement Corporation or the ICMA Retirement Trust, and shall cast on behalf of the City of San Jacinto, anv required votes under the program. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this l9th day of February, 1991. ATTEST: eputy City Clerk CITY OF SAN JACINTO Mayor CERTIFICATE The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. 1931 duly adopted by said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date therein set forth. )eputy City Clerk ICMA RETIREMENT CORPORATION Suite 700 (202) 737-6616 1120 G Stree:, NV,' io!I Free (600) 424.9249 Washington. DC 20005 FILE INFORMATION SHEET The information you provide on thissheet is essential for proper plan administration. As you complete this form, please refer to the instructions on the reverse side. 1. Employer's full name (City of, County of, etc.) City of San Jacinto 2. Plan Coordinator (Name and title of official to whom all correspondence and reports are to be mailed) Anna Vega, Finance Director 3. Employer's address P.O. Box 488 (201 E. Main St.) (street. PO hoc. cia) San Jacinto, California 92383 (stele) (zip code) 4. Phone number (714) 6547337 5. Employer's Federal Tax Identification Number 95-6000780 6. How otten will you make ccntributions? bi—weeklv 7. What is the first pay date of plan implementation? 03-01-91 82 8. Number of employees eligible to participate 82 9. Total number of employees 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. 1932 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ADDRESSING IMPACTS OF SENATE BILL 2557 (MADDY) WHEREAS, State deliberations toward adoption of the 1990- 91 budget were exceptionally arduous due to a projected revenue shortfall of 3.6 billion dollars; and WHEREAS, the 1990-91 state budget was not adopted until July 31, 2.990, a record -setting 31 days past the constitutional deadline of June 30; and WHEREAS, funding for County -operated, State -mandated programs was reduced by more than 700 million dollars statewide and 16 million dollars in Riverside County; and WHEREAS, the State Legislature was reticent to make such severe reductions in vital programs without providing some potential for counties to generate new revenue; therefore, Senate Bill 2557 was enacted during the final hours of budget deliber- ations without customary review and analysis; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 2557 has fueledsignificant intense and divisive debate among local governments as to the appropriate- ness of counties exercising the revenue -generating authority provided in Senate Bil]. 2557; and WHEREAS, numerous counties have reluctantly imposed the lew fees and taxes to partially offset state budget reductions so that essential health, welfare, and justice programs could e provided; and WHEREAS, schools, cities, counties, and special districts -11 need dependable sources of revenue to provide an adequate level of services to a growing population and simple redistri- •ution of these revenues is not an adequate solution; and WHEREAS, resolution of local government fiscal issues, ike state fiscal issues, requires thoughtful consideration with irect involvement of the affected parties; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of San Jacinto in regular session assembled on February 19, 1991, does hereby 23 Thin with County government, schools, other cities, and special 24 3istricts in Riverside County to express concern about Senate i11 2557 and its divisive effect on local governments' ability o work cooperatively to meet the collective needs of all County esidents; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of San Jacinto urges epeal of Senate Bill 2557 with the enactment of an acceptable, dequate and dependable replacement revenue source; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Legislature establish Commission on Local Government with representatives of schools, ities, counties, special districts and private industry to Address impacts of potential State budget actions having direct leffects on local government; and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Resolution No. 1.932 Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the State undertake an in depth review of all of the mandates imposed upon local govern- ments and remove those which are unnecessary, ineffective, and/or not fully funded. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of February, 1991. ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk CITY OF SAN JACINTO CERTIFICATE Mayor The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. 1932 duly adopted by said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date therein set forth. Deputy City Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Iionorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: February 19, 1991 SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM H - Villas Water Connection As you will see in the attached memo from Water Superintendent John Townsel, one hid was received for the installation of a connecting water main at Sombra and Camino Grande. John estimates that he could install the water main with City personnel for $4,781.00. As advised by our City Attorney, a municipality may perform a public works job by "day labor" if they pass a resolution (by 4/5ths vote) stating that a project can be more efficiently done by "day labor". Such a resolution has been drafted up for your review and recommended adoption this evening. Recommendation: As part of your adoption of the Consent Calendar, making the following motion: rejection of al.l.bids for the construction of a water main (Sombra Way and Camino Grande) and adoption of Resolution No. 1936. 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. 1936 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A WATERLINE (SOMBRA. WAY AND CAMINO GRANDE) BY DAY LABOR PURSUANT TO PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE 20167. WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto did advertise for Notice Inviting Bids for construction of a waterline on January 30, and February 4, 1991, and WHEREAS, bids were received and opened on February 13, 1991, at 10:00 a.m., and WHEREAS, one bid was received in the amount of $11,416.00, and WHEREAS, it is determined that the project can be completed for an amount of $4,781.00, using day labor, and WHEREAS, all bids have been relected. IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, RESOLVED that the City of San Jacinto complete the construction of a waterline (Sombre Way and Camino Grande) by day labor, pursuant to Public Contract Code 20167. MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED this 19th day of February, 1991. ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk CITY OF SAN JACINTO Mayor CERTIFICATE The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. 1936 duly adopted by the said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein. Deputy City Clerk TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ: CITY OF SAN JACINTO WATER DEPARTMENT 905 Industrial Way San Jacinto, CA 92383 Pamela Easter, City Manager John Townsel, Water Superintendent February 19, 1991 Sombra Way Extension The Sombra Way water main extension has been formally bid. The only bid received was for $11,416.00. I respectfully request that this bid be rejected. If the Council so chooses, City Water personnel can install this main for $4,781.00. PARTS = $3,081.00 LABOR = $1,100.00 EQUIPMENT = $ 600.00 SIGNED \ fr/ /I j John Townsel, Water Superintendent v' jt/kp San Jacinto Fire Department MEMO PRIDA February 14, 1991 TO: City Council via City Manager Pamela S. Easter FROM: Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief SUBJECT: Council Adoption of Annex "B" - Fire and Rescue Operations/Fire Mutual Aid Plan RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the City Council approve Resolution No. 1933 which adopts Annex "B - Fire and Rescue Operations/Fire Mutual Aid Plan of Riverside County Emergency Operations Plan. BACKGROUND: Under the auspices of the State Master Mutual Aid Agreement, the City of San Jacinto Fire Department currently responds, when requested to do so by the area mutual aid coordinator (currently the County of Riverside Fire Department), a maximum of one fire/rescue company and one command officer to emergency incidents located outside of City of San Jacinto responsibility lands. Up to the present time, however, the county -wide response of fire service mutual aid resources has generally been determined at the time of a mutual aid request or requests being made, not beforehand, as might be more operationally effective. Additionally, there has not been a common county -wide numbering system for all apparatus resources. Remarkably enough, different types of apparatus with different types or levels of capability might be called the same thing from one fire agency to another. The neighboring counties of San Bernardino, San Diego, Los Angeles and Orange have all had for sometime formalized fire service mutual aid plans. Since October. 1988 however, the Emergency Services/Mutual Aid Committee of the Riverside County Fire Chief's Association and the Emergency Services Division of the Riverside County Fire Department, under the leadership of City of San Jacinto Fire Chief Ross Chadwick and through the efforts of a nine -person Pab,e 1 Memo for Resolution No. 1933 Adoption of Annex B - Fire and Rescue Operations/Fire Mutual Aid Plan work group, have worked to develop a formalized plan for use within the County of Riverside. The plan's principal elements include: 1. The pre -planned movement of apparatus, equipment, and personnel resources which lists the closest fifteen (15) fire engines, the number of personnel on each unit, and the estimated response time to each city in the County. 2. A common communications plan which allows mutual aid resources to operate on a common radio channel anywhere in the County or State. A common apparatus resource numbering system which eliminates confusion by assigning an individual number to each piece of emergency equipment in the County. The plan was developed as Annex B to the Riverside County Multi -Hazard Operations Plan. As an annex to this plan, the Fire and Rescue Operations section will be updated on a County -wide basis as changes occur. C ROSS CHADWICK Fire Chief pace RESOLUTION NO. 1933 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO. CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF ANNEX `B' -- FIRE AND RESCUE OPERATIONS/FIRE MUTUAL AID PLAN OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN. WHICH DIRECTLY INVOLVES THE APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL RESOURCES OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO FIRE DEPARTMENT. WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto, California currently maintains and operates a fire department within the City's boundaries for the purpose of providing a variety of protective services to City of San Jacinto responsibility lands; and WHEREAS, within the County of Riverside there are also currently maintained and operated another nine municipal fire departments, one county fire department, and three fire protection districts for the purpose of providing a similar variety of protective services to designated local, county, or district responsibility lands; and WHEREAS, it is mutually beneficial for all of the above referenced fire agencies to render assistance to one another to deter the deleterious effect of major fires, medical emergencies and exposure to hazardous conditions, the scope of which incidents is beyond the source capability of any one fire agency; and WHEREAS, it is operationally more effective for the response of such fire service inter -agency mutual assistance to be preplanned before a major incident occurs, and not during such an incident; and WHEREAS, the State of California's Multi -Hazard Functional Planning process includes the provision of an annex to a municipality's or county's emergency operations plan specifically for fire and rescue operations/fire mutual aid; and WHEREAS, the Emergency Services/Mutual Aid Committee of the Riverside County Firc Chiefs Association and the Emergency Services Division of the County of Riverside Fire Department has recently developed such an annex; and WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto Fire Chief has recommended that the City of San Jacinto tale an active part in the fire and rescue operations/fire muwal aid provisions contained therein. Febr ua r/ 19, L79 &sr -tint -inn IV'n, 1 Q Adoption of Annex "B" - Fire and RescueQoerations/Mutual Aid Plan NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO that it does hereby approve the adoption of the provisions for fire and rescue operations/fire mutual aid, as set forth in Annex "B" - Fire and Rescue Operations/Fire Mutual. Aid of the County of Riverside Emergency Operations Plan, which directly involves the apparatus, equipment and personnel of the City of San Jacinto Fire Department. MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED this 19th day of February, 1991. ATTEST: City Clerk CERTIFICATE Mayor The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. 1933 duly adopted by the said City Council of the S2 id City of San Jacinto on the date therein set forth. City Clerk February 19. 1991 1)a,:c 2 MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: February 15, 1991 SUBJ: Authorization for Extra Work - NBS/Lowry Redesign Intersection of San Jacinto and Esplanade Avenues to Eliminate Dip A you know, NBS/Lowry is under contract to the City to design a storm drain and street improvements in Esplanade Avenue between State Street and San Jacinto Avenue. As the storm drain construction will extend into the intersection of Esplanade and San Jacinto Avenue, it occurred to Staff this would be the appropriate time to eliminate the dip on the east side of the intersection, increasing the efficiency of the intersection. NBS/Lowry has prepared a proposal in the amount of $8,500 to provide the necessary engineering, plans, and specifications for this additional work. Staff feels this is a fair proposal and recommends Staff be authorized to execute the agreement for extra work. Respectfully Submitted, 7) BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM:lr RY H59-072.086 February 5, 1991 Brian McNabb City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92383 E 64.,:iNEERS 17245 Wes/ Nrida Avenue POE Bol 851 ti6rnet, CuHarm4 92:143-3814 714 658-7116 ter 7'4 652-3804 Fox FEB 6 1991 Commicnity Development SUBJECT: EXTRA WORK - ADDITIONAL TOPOGRAPHY AND DESIGN ON STORM PLANS AND STREET PLANS TO ALLEVIATE PROBLEM ON SAN JACINTO AVENUE Dear Brian: NBS/Lowry is pleased to offer the following proposal for the design of the east side of the intersection of Esplanade Avenue and San Jacinto Avenue. This design will allow us to remove the existing cross -gutter on the east side of San Jacinto Avenue, which will provide a much improved driving condition when traveling on Esplanade Avenue and crossing San Jacinto Avenue. It will be necessary to do the following additional work to accomplish the above: 1. Perform topographic survey on area of Esplanade Avenue east of San Jacinto Avenue. 2. Revise storm drain plans and revise drainage study for the area to be changed. 3. Revise street improvement plans to incorporate changes. Also do a blow-up of the intersection to 1" = 20' scale to provide adequate room for detail. 4. Revise quantities and implement changes into the specifi- cations. 5 Coordinate revisions with Caltrans. We met with Caltrans PeLutits Section and they said they would prefer not to have cross -gutters on their highway. They said they had no objection to the changes. H59-072.086 city of San Jacinto February 5, 1991 Page 2 6. Provide coordination with the utility companies which have facilities in this intersection. These utility companies appear to be Southern California Gas Company, General Telephone, Southern California Edison, and East- ern Municipal Water District. We propose to perform the above services for a fixed fee of $8,500. This proposal does not include environmental studies, soils engineering, right-of-way surveying or engineering construc- tion surveying, or construction management. If and when these services are necessary, we will provide a proposal to perforn the work. The standard provisions set forth in the original agreement are herein incorporated and made part of this change order. The fees and all other charges will be billed monthly as the work progresses, and the net amount shall be due at the time of billing. If you concur with the scope of this work, please indicate so by signing and returning the copy of this letter to our of- fice. We are looking forward to doing this project for you and are prepared to begin work immediately. Very truly yours, NBS/LOWRY CITY OF SAN JACINTO By: By George . Havens Brian McNabb Title: Sr. Engineering Associate Title: Date: Date: By: Eugenie L. Diep ol Title: Vice President Date: GPH/ELD/sp Enclosure MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: February 1.4, 1991 SUBJ: ROAD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT LAFCO recently approved Annexation 65 located between Sanderson Avenue and Lyon Avenue north of Cottonwood and between Sanderson Avenue and Kirby Street north of Seventh Street. Once the subject property is annexed into the City, jurisdictional breaks will occur along Cottonwood Avenue. Because these jurisdictional breaks will occur the following condition of approval was imposed upon annexation 65. "The City must execute an agreement with the County for maintenance of Cottonwood Avenue from Kirby Street east to the City limits." The maintenance agreement for road maintenance on Cottonwood Avenue and Lyon Avenue is attached. As stated within the agreement, the City obligation shall he to maintain Cottonwood Avenue from the City boundary at Lori Ann, easterly to Kirby Street. The County obligation shall he to maintain Lyon Avenue from Cottonwood Avenue north to the City Boundary. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council enter into an agreement with the County for the maintenance of both Cottonwood Avenue and Lyon Avenue as conditioned by LAFCO. Respectfully, i, y/ f BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development T FRANKLIN E SHERKOW Diredor of Tnnsportacion Brian McNabb Director of Public Works City of San Jacinto P.O. Box 488 San Jacinto, CA 92383 RE: ROAD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Dear Mr. McNabb: NSPORTATION DEPARTMENT January 24, 1991 Attached is a proposed Maintenance Agreement which should meet the condition of annexation. Please review the Agreement, and if it is acceptable, have your Council approve the Agreement. Return all four copies to this office for Board Action. After the Board approves the Agreement, I will send you a fully executed copy for your file. Should you have any questions, please call me at (714) 275-6740. Very truly yours, Zan F ennant Deputy Director of Transportation IFT:hn Attachments cc: Gary McKenzie .n.,7711.0-713 IAN 2 8 1991 DeveVpment. COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER 4080 LEMON STRUT • 7T11 FLOOR • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 (714) 225-6880 FAX (714) 275(5721 111 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 2 3 This Agreement is between the City of San Jacinto if ("City") and the County of Riverside' ("County") for maintenance 4 of Cottonwood Avenue and Lyon Avenue. 5 1. Purpose: Pursuant to Annexation No. 65 to the City of San Jacinto, LAFCO No. 90-38-3, a condition was imposed 6 whereby "The City must execute an agreement with the County for maintenance of Cottonwood Avenue from Kirby Street east to the 7 City limits." 8 2. Definition: Maintenance shall be defined as those routine activities performed to keep the road safe and includes, 9 but is not limited to such activities as patching pot holes, replacing signs and markers, grading shoulders, cleaning 10 culverts, removing weeds and trash from right-of-way and trimming trees. 11 3. City Obliaation: City shall maintain Cottonwood 12 Avenue from City boundary at Lori Ann Street, easterly to Kirby Street. 13 4. County Obligation: County shall maintain Lyon 14 Avenue from Cottonwood north to the City boundary, 15 5. Term: This Agreement shall remain in effect until such time as jurisdiction for either or both streets rests solely 16 with City as the result of a proposed annexation or until, by mutual agreement of the parties this agreement is otherwise 17 terminated. 18 6. Liability: Neither party, its officers agents or employees, shall have any liability for intentional or negligent lg acts, by ommission or commission, by the other party, or of any officer, agent or employee thereof. Each party shall indemnify 20 and hold the other party, there respective officers, agents, employees and independent contractors harmless from any claim or 21 action arising out of performance of this Agreement with respect to any work to be performed by or authority delegated to such 22 party. 23 7. Notices: Any and all notices sent or required to be sent to the parties to this Agreement will be mailed by first 24 class mail, postage prepaid, to the following addresses: 25 City of San Jacinto P.O. Box 488 26 San Jacinto, CA 92383 27 /// 28 WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 3535 - 1077{ STREET RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA County of Riverside Transportation Department 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAM C. KAT2ENSTEIN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 3535 . 10T1-1 STREET RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on ATTEST: BY: CITY CLERK ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board BY: DEPUTY JSR:kc lit429 (SEAL) CITY OF SAN JACINTO BY: MAYOR COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BY: CHAIRMAN MEMO r ^ TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DA1E: February 15, 1991 SUBJ: Annexation 69 to the City of San Jacinto (North Mountain) Attached is a letter of request from Roger Morgan to commence the annexation of approximately 1120 acres on the portions of North Mountain owned by North Mountain Partners. As a result of this request, Staff has prepared Resolution Nos. 1929 and 1935 for Council consideration. These resolutions authorize an application to be filed with LAFCO for amendment to the Sphere of Influence and Annexation. Prior to filing these applications, the following tasks must be accomplished: 1. Resolutions authorizing the filing of the applications must be adopted by the City Council. (February 19, 1991) 2. The City must establish a General Plan designation and pre -zoning for the property. (Approved by Planning Commission on February 13, 1991; Scheduled for City Council March 5, 1991) 3. Plat map and legal description must be prepared by Roger Morgan 4. The applications must be completed by Roger Morgan 5. The plan of services must be completed by the City 6. Fiscal Impact Study must be completed by Roger Morgan We have projected the application can be filed with LAFCO by approximately May 1, 1991. While the applications are being processed through the City and through LAFCO, the City will simultaneously be processing the Soboba Summit Specific Plan and Environmental Impact Report. Staff is hoping the approval of the Soboba Summit Specific Plan and the annexation will be completed in the first quarter of 1992. We are anticipating Mr. Morgan will be making a formal presentation of his project on March 5, 1991 and asking the Council to consider approval of a Memorandum of Understanding concerning his project. Respectfully, _J-- BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM:Ir January 31, 1991 Mr. Brian McNabb City of San Jacinto P.O. Box 488 San Jacinto, California 92383 RE: North Mountain, San Jacinto, California This is to advise you of our desire to annex Section 13 and the remainder of Section 14 into the City of San Jacinto, as delineated on the attached map. Sincerely, INTERMAC, INC. R gVI er Morgah Attachment 8080 W. HIDDEN LAKES, ROSEVILLE, CA 95661 (916) 797-1215 . FAX (916) 797-1217 /: G %! NORTH MOUNTAIN PROJECT SAN JACINTO, cALIFORNTJ A : \ - » 4 6 y 411, 11, TER EXFIBIT "A" ESOLUTION.NO. 17-27' Ib tLWILD HEMET- LAKE = 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. 1929 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO INITIATE ON ITS OWN MOTION PROCEEDINGS TO ANNEX CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY KNOWN AB ANNEXATION NO. 69 WHEREAS, some property owners desire annexation to the City of San Jacinto; and WHEREAS, annexation to the City of San Jacinto will contribute to the orderly growth of the City, provide proper control of street layouts, sanitary sewer and water design and to insure proper use of land in conformity with the General Plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City Council of the City of San Jacinto proposes to initiate on its own motion proceedings to annex to the City of San Jacinto all the territory hereinafter described on Exhibit "A" as uninhabited territory pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Organization Act. 2. That the territory which the Council proposes to annex shall be identified as Annexation No. 69. 3. That the City Manager, or his designated representative, is hereby authorized to file with the Local Agency Formation Commission the appropriate application and sign any and all documents therefore. 1991. ATTEST: MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED on the 19th day of February, Deputy city Clerk Mayor CERTIFICATE The forgoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. 1929 duly adopted by the said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein. Deputy City Clerk 1.600 HCH PARTNERS • 3200 26 606 Dovolopmonl Design si howIlallon services Pialfill4119 I Geophics ".. ...... ; ; 10,580' 17- L. . .......... / I 4-Riv stde. ount 7,850' 41- LEGEND Area of Annexation Project Boundary EXHIBIT "A" — RESOLUTION NO. 1929 Mni OHM 601/ 1A IMO ym Exhibit No. Proposed Annexation NORTH MOUNTAIN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. 1935 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO CONFIRMING RESOLUTION 1727A AND COMMENCING PROCEEDINGS FOR AMENDING THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56426 requires the establishment of a sphere of influence for cities; and WHEREAS, Section 56425-56427 establish procedures for amendments to the sphere of influence; and WHEREAS, the City Council has previously adopted Resolutions 1727A commencing proceedings to amend the sphere of influence. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of San Jacinto confirms Resolution No. 1727A. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City will commence proceedings to amend the sphere of influence. 1991. ATTEST: MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED on the 19th day of February, Deputy City Clerk Mayor CERTIFICATE The forgoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. 1935 duly adopted by the said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein. Deputy City Clerk 2 3 4 5 0 7 8 9 10 1] 12 ]3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 99 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 RESOLUTION NO. 1727A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMENCING PROCEEDINGS FOR AMENDING THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO INCLUDING THE DETACHMENT OF TERRITORY FROM THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE OF THE CITY OF HEMET. WHEREAS, establishment WHEREAS, mendments to Government Code Section 56426 requires the of a sphere of influence for cities; and Section 56425-56427 establish procedures for the sphere of influence; and WHEREAS, the current sphere of influence does not effectively define the total area which impacts the City. of San Jacinto physically, economically and socially; and WHEREAS, portions of land in the sphere of influence of the City of Hemet are within an area that has financial impact on San Jacinto or is more associated with industry common to San Jacinto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, that San Jacinto declares its intent to submit an amendment to its sphere of influence, which includes detachment from Hornets sphere of influence, as outlined in Exhibit A and directs the City Manager, or his representative, to submit an application for such amendment on behalf of the City. MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED is l7th day of A.vember, 1987, ATTEST: Deputy )City Clerk No. San Mayor CERTIFICATE The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution 1727 duly adopted by the said City Council of the City of Jacinto on the date therein set forth. MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DA IE: February 15, 1991 SUBJ: Final Tract Map 24140 APPLICANT: Sirco Development Inc. 12062 Valley View Street Suite 202 Garden Grove, CA 92645 (714) 892-3008 LOCATION: Northwest corner of Chase Street and the Ramona Expressway. Staff and the City Engineer have reviewed Final Map 24140 and found it to be in substantial compliance with the Conditions of Approval, the Subdivision Ordinance, and Subdivision Map Act. Staff recommends the Council approve Final Map 24140 and authorize the Mayor to execute the Subdivision Agreement. Respectfully Submitted, A y:" 6-7 BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. TRACT NO. 24140 SANBJAACINTO LANING A D ISION A" IATIONPORTION SHDU BY IW'LONBFILE AND 22 OF 6Dp( D. PAGE 367 OFLANDS OF TMApS, RECORDS Or SAN DIEGO COUNTY. PIADOLE G ASSOCIATES. INC. WILLIAM HOARD JASSO. L. S. '4766 JUNE. OWNER'S STATEMENT • WE HEREBY STATE THAT VE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE CONSENT IS INECESSARYON NTOEPASS; ATCLEARETI RE THE TLE TO SSAID PERSONS THAT 21 CONSENT TO THE MANIAC AND RECORDING OF THIS SUBDIVISION MAP AB SHOWN WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE. VE HEREBY DEDICATE TO PUBLIC USE FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. LOTS 'A' THROUGH 'O'. INCLUSIVE. DE AL50 HEREBY CED1CATE TO THE CITY OF BAN JACINTO LOT 'M FOR OPEN SPACE AREA PURPOSES. WE ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE ABUTTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALONG RA10+4* BOULEVARD TO THE PUBLIC. THE OWNERS R LOTS 50 THROUGH 62. INCLUSIVE, ABUTTING THIS H i0HVAT AND DURING EACH TIME DILL HAVE N0 RIGHTS OF ACCESS EXCEPT TIE GENERAL EASEMENT OF TRAVEL. FIRST NAT 0q�T, NTONW E'FINANCIAL CORPORATION. A DELAWARE CORPORATION DBA,J, 4/,.'y,.PRE6f0ENT CAR�QMy6.Aa.41 4411.SEMETARY NOTARY ACKN0VLECGMENT6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA I COUNTY DF 4os ~'-H.', 1 5.5. ON THIS Z A'`'i DAY OF _C?..L 'A.. . 199CL. BEFORE ME, THE UN'OERS1GNED. A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY AHD STATE PERSONALLY APPEARE0:115' c.A: PERSONALLY KNOWN TO ME R PROVED IC 111E CN THE BASIS O sf ISFACTRY EVIDENCE TO BE THE ✓±CF PRE910ENT. AND 1_ .• S41 PERSONALLY SWIM Tpp ME OR PROVED TOYS ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE 22t' SECRETARY OF FIRST NATIONWIDE FINANCIAL CORP.. A DELAVARE CORPORATION, THE CORPORATION THAT EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND AC1(NODLEOGE0 TO ME THAT SUCH CORPORATION EXECUTED THE VITH(N INSTRUMENT PURSUANT TO ITS BY -LADS R A 2E04U'Tlpp OF ITS BOARD /R DIRECTORS. 7^^' .N'.IC0/i- NOTARY YKPUBLIC NY COnnI55(ON EXPIRES 00-10-92 PRINCIPAL PLACE OP 6051NESE Lc* � *AXfs Ce*s'P SOILS EEPC.6i A PRE,, In:I:AP.T S.: LE CONSULTANTS INC. ON THe HEALTH AND SAFE, T _AS PREPARED SY ARAGON GEOTECHNICAL in CAT pf SEP 70±±3(R. 1969. AS REWIRED BY 1990 MEET 1 Err 3 6Yf2T5 Ro-0AxA.E VTATE1M .1 , 6 . at Pa.. - _. .. 1p, ,,.a .I 11. CoY C,..6. x.. VILL1M E. tM5L4. Cunt, R..e.... 8.' O1Iu1Y 6.44T.u,.. 5±....,.. rm., RYtLtmt_ mK WVY.J4 cc.,1.5Y SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT BY CAILIIFOORNIATATE A'D THAT THIS MAd A P i CONSISTING 06 THRELAND E (3) SSHHEEETSACORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY 6UPERv15I00 DURING FEBRUARY. 1989 AND POSI TIONS ARETC RRECTLY HOS0 NHOR VWILLNSEE INOPLACE WITHINXOYEAR FROM RECORDATION OF THIS MAP. THE MONUMENTS WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. THE SURVEY 16 TRUE AND COONNcL-2`\£ AS 6HOVN. DATED C.T. //A 19%4 -08172..:,Cpe 1gy. .6dp WILLIAM ROARS JA L „ YV66 EXP, 9/30/91 CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT 1 HERESY STATE THAT 1 NAVE EXAMINED THE WITHIN ANNEXED HAP. THAT DE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON I6 SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME A5 IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF, THAT ALL R THE PROVISIONS R THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND R THE SAN JACINTO CITY ORDINANCES HAVE SEEN C0MPLIE0 WITH, AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT. A6 OHM/N. DATE, Alegre 19.9 '.1!) .NN.m ^j JACINTH CITY ENGINEER INS CIR ENGINEER ner H(P CITY ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT THE CITY COUNCIL R SAN JACINTO. COUNT( OE RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY AND THROUGH IT5 DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS. AT A REGULAR MEETING Of HEREBY APPROVES SAID FINAL MAP, AND ACCEPTS THE OFFER R DEDICATION MADE HEREON. FR PUBLIC ROAD AFC PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. CONTINGENT UPON THE COMPLETION OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE DEDICATIONS. CITY OF AN JACINTO COUNTYOF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9Y MAYOR DATE, 19 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL THE STREET DEDICATIONS• UTILITY EASEMENTS AND ASUrIER`O RIGHT SF ACCESS 6M2i0N ON THE WITHIN ANNEXED MAP ARE HERESY APPRCR'EO. DATE, . 19_. BY. DIRECT'R DE PL'BLI' YORKE CITY OF £A1: JACINTO PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATE THIS MAP. TRACT ND_ 24140. SUBSTANTIALLY CONFCRno' TO THE TENTATIVE MAP R TRACT ND. 241'0 NIGH WAS APPROVED EY THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO PLANNING COMMISSION ON APRIL 12. 1989. DATED: 19 BY, PLANNING COMMIG5(0±. SECREIART CITY OF BAN JACINTH TAX COLLECTOR CERTIFICATE 1 HEREBY STATE THAT ACCORDING' TO THE RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE AS DF THIS DATE. THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE WITHIN NAP FOR UNPAID STATE. COUNTY. MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL TAXES R SPECIA. ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES NOV A LIEN BUT HOT YET PAYABLE. WHICH ARE ESTIMATED TO BE 6 DATE. 19 R. VATNE WATTS COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR BY DEPUTY TAX ECHO STATEMENT I MEREST STATE THAT A BOND IN THE BUM OF P EXECUTED AND FILED WITH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF TIE COUNTY COUNTY BEEN RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA. COITI0NE0 UPON THE PAYMENT OF A'_LTA% SF F4 STATE. COUNTY, MUNICIPAL 0R LOCAL AND ALL SPECIAL A55E55MEN,TS COLLECTED AS TAXES WHICH AT THE TILE DF FILING OF THIS MAP 1.1TH THE COUNT,' RECORDER ARE A LIEN AGAINST SAID PROPERTY BUT NOT YET PAYABLE AND SAID BONO HAS BEEN DULY APPROVED EY SAID BOARD OE SINERV1s0R5. DATED. 19 "ERALD A. MALONET CLERK OF THE BOARD DE SUPERVISORS EY, DEPUTY CASH TAX BONO R. VATNE WATTS COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR BY, CL LITT MASOLE A ASSOCIATES. INC. l/ILLIAM ROAR° JASSO. L. S. 4756 Sl.480LYON'5 P10TES. 1.£ BASIS 6 BEARINGS IS THE CENTERLINE V IDTLLYILL COMK. WOW u 9+ 50•26' Y O1 RECORD Of SURVEY FILED IN BOCK 76. PAGES DI 101LOI JD 6 0(6080S 6 DAVEY OR RIVERSIDE COUNTY. O INOICA1F9 FOND IENMENT AS SWAN. C1 INDICATES LOCATION OF 2' INCS PIPE TACED L. 5. 9756 PER TRACT zu+o-a. R.S. 15 INDICATES LCEATICS LF .2- IRON PIPE TACED L. 5. 97661'ER TRACT 241 w-1. N.S. z20 / l3 10 ❑ 1/OICAIES SET 2- IRON PIPE TAGGED .1.. S. 9756•. O INDICATES SET I. 1RD1 PIPE IS' L3S DITN TAG :TWEED 'L. B. 9756'. FLUSH. (CITYORSANJKISTO STO 110.41-904) '•TT 1• IRON PIPE 1A' LONG YITN TAD STAMPED 'L. 6. 4751I'. RASH. (CITY OF 5141 JACINTO STp 141-9015) AT ALL REAR LOT CORNERS M° 41W1FA MUCKS. l5LESS DTIIEA1111E NOTED. SET NAIL .VD TA6 STAPFED 'L. 5. 050- O4 TO' OF CURS AT T$ PR0.PA.ATID1 OF LOT LINES FOR FRONT LOT CORNERS. (CITY OF SAN JACINTO STD. M,905 ) MIS TRACT CONTAINS 16.760 ASS GROSS. THIS TRACT CONTAINS 62 NLPSEREID LOTS AND LOTS A• THROWN 9I'. ( INDICATES RECORD DATA PER R. B. 70/21-39. * INDICATES RECORD DATA PER TRACT 40. 29140.1. 1 INDICATES RECORD DATA POT TRACT W. 333,3, INDICATES SON-VDNCULAR ACCESS �J.'�FtIEHT KITES. L� A RIC+RT 6 DAY FOR ROADS CR VOA PAR. D Y ITN 5 7410 L AVENUE. ALSO A RIRIT OF WAY FOR (IN.OS O( {q DIibES q PIPES Fq ®AL)CTIHG AND D19Tfl11t1t11Y WATER. ® AN EASEMENT FOR EITTER CR BON POLE LNFB. 000611TY OR LPSEAGRDM FACILITIES AND INCIDENTAL RAMSES. IN FAVOR O BCy1ERN SIERRAS POWER 015AYT. MOCKED BARON 29. 19220 IN BOOK 2621. PAGE 623 6 DFEDD. RECORDS 6 RIVERSIDE =PITY. I INF DATA 00.y) IN N 4.1640W 52.1.) 1 .al IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, TRACT NO. 24140 BEING A GIBDIV1510N 16 A PORTION OF FARM L0T5 20 AND `CrnOF TIC LANDS OF THE BAN JACINTO LAND AFOREY•IAT1O1 AD SNOW BY MAP ON FILE IN BOO( B. PA4t C.17 OF BAPS. RECO108 OF SAN DIEG) COUNTY, JLNE. 1990 SCALE IN FEET t0a 200 900 500 000 91 Ce RAMONA EXPRESSWAY IDYLLWILD DRIVE ro c',t IY T40.5.£p Roo 1'+G) j N�K(p fib' Nd 56112E1RE0 An 1 FXCY P 4H 5RT O aM KCI Oaa I I I ) r 7 41iu1G11G61G]I0I BGI IRAISSIaelsl / m( 1 1 1 1 1 9T -- -r-Tr.} 451u 7 66� '1 >a1 Tl ie ]a TY M H9I a9lac DI EC „ 9B ABET z I 11 ser0s. 1V [VA' 01 FLU').K T040 KEE IK u u /rn. t/aa-ET NQTH104 r 6•T L,, R,\'L y' SD' PM 1'09 PCL 1 `O CL J I 1 1 ��T]�n 1Tc u` - 1 ,G r� rT- M W..�RLB IJD NI N 4,441 9,6 ac IS rP G D� 3 l`•�T�4. n v � A ®� © ®11®14 1Y \4 Ell C 5 wINjY.�F'K C1.1'4G[T - N.4 a 6A. w A x � ] IC I6 IS M. J 04 I I m 8 7 yy' d 1 - CL 3 >1a4 1 iE.1 a\"' d- ti 61 K G� 0l0,l0 l .I 1 44 xW5-� O / w r 1k 00145 D1oc Ts-170V -1 e44. 0' rW84. ACLCPT[D. Ac 7-554i. Ch'L W=LD auae TnOOTe1e7 L LANE e= uk ra�00-00 1� HONa6 of ceer0mc: 1Lx..I7LUW N .n. PO I' Ir. w 00LLL w1TH KN. CO. 010V00 Top 0.1. 1S PP..0 Kp TlEe-as {R95 TI5/E9 -67 RAMONA BOULEVARD V'V I( RC* 2.,I..9 FILO:.+ Nc, RC, XKCNYTIV Q\6 y 14T OF C1ll^vG h<m r 1. ASSOCIATES, INC. V ILL AM 1'3OARO ,µ..pp• L. S. 4756 JUNE. 1990 SEE SHEET NO. 2 947 44.6 r ainI 0 105 \e ' 44. 0'b' IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. TRACT NO. 24140 BEING A BUBO V1S ION OF A PORTION OF FARIB LOTS 20 MO 22 OF THE LADS OF TIE SAN JACINTO LMD ASSOCIATION AO SIONN ST HAP DN FILE I 0303 O. PACE 357 OF NAPS. RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO IXONTY. TRACT NG. 24140 - 2 a W R7 772G 0.R 10 Th'S ,.£. �' 772s J d' C g• - 8 0^ aP. a a r 25 a ae.e..R _ Haas .R +a? 32 33 * aBae,... 0 Y , 26 •v 31 ae-A`k, 34 •� 9.a nz„ •i Y" 6aaAi�sv ev � �W ® �'•g y � 39 I J 7 R a '�MA,La 3 •,yfd'15's`+'N '•T'n'o, N_M• is �1 0 • 30 ® U7 ' j ` 0 35'MA:, pica 4Y 8 6 �+a�.is_KGSs. ,Tj�aiz's�;ty_sx3Z:r1o8c.' .?:�2@0•_ 38® H•OG'YY M H.Cd']SY f�14' 0']OV H. ,firs0. V W 3 ®' SYO^I7.03<Q 111@ fW e F -11,7.02 �.i C 28 z , 8r>-" 9rvJ ,-� :0 36 �00 .; eams¢R es0s.R 29 0 C30 sa9s�.x eaa} SF 37 -61C141 0 0 •&� 8. Iw 00 103.00 wwa-0 300.00 0 2Yt.m M LOT N„ 9 t D� U CA Os5 a vas A $ 00.10- 20 y� 03 6 7604 Si n.0 m.00 19 yo o� i2/O,.R = 70.00 18 Y a -74)0 ,.R MOO 17 .. oa ;- 78JGAp. N 11.00'b•tl 20.00 v 16 .o 29 $a ?&42s7: Y w•OYyv IY.17 " J9.3O 15 n8 Pa 22M,.r. 71D.13 70.w - 14 ,. '"8 pa 7430..,.. =G / ro.00 13 •."8 'a 7a'•fW,.A = 70.00 se. 12 '"8 na ` 72A0,.r M / N F�® II �j4i 7m4? SF u • S a l s � W 8 q__ S 4 BTlo'SI7 1 94w n.W 7JA7, r . a _a 2 70.M m.W 72ro r.A . 3 row . m.m g7&'O,.A. I, 4 70.00 7o.W 7.44C D.R .a a ^a 5 0 70.W 7e.W ?lb art u 23 5 7a.00 70.0p Xb,.r u 23 0 7 0 7U.Oa m.0 73K ,.R 8 0 70,00 70.W 7270,, Y 9 0 la. M 70.00 7C[L S,; a 10 j� u00 /1 Car W7N0.2/0E•2 55 : 55 54 W `8 "8 725,.r 7215s, 7t15,.r. Ir•W'b'Y l0J.07 4.66.36'41 I090.40 LOT "A' -- C 0 0M01AI A 1:7n,0 N warT3LF79E2T5 SCALE IN FEET 0 'P l,733 a.P. 42 4 113 50 LL:1:1 . `® 43731o,r. �¢ Jl ® dp. 7,0 0 44 `9. 7704,.r.�C.r N7� 045 72aj a. y N30.,ow c na.x 46 A505 aR 49 71935.r. - n 1131. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 19th day of February 1991, by and between FIRST NATIONWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, the parties of the first part, hereinafter designated and called "contractor" and the CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, a Municipal Corporation of the County of Riverside, State of California, acting by and through Francis A. Boykin, as Mayor and Maurice D. Armster as City Clerk, thereunto authorized so to act, the party of the second part, hereinafter designated and called "Council". WITNESSETH THAT, WHEREAS, said contractor has presented to the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, to wit: Tract 24140, a copy of which said proposed map is attached to this agreement and is hereby referred to and made a part of this agreement for any and all particulars, and has requested the said City Council to accept the dedication of the street or streets delineated and shown on said map as and for a public street or highway, or streets and highways, and to otherwise approve said map to the end that said map may be recorded as required by law; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto requires as a condition precedent to the acceptance and approval of said map the dedication of such streets, highways and public ways as delineated and shown on said map and deems the same as necessary for the public use; that any street or streets delineated and shown on said map may be improved by the construction thereon and installation therein of grading, paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm drains, sanitary sewers, street name signs, survey monuments, and water pipes and mains, together with fire hydrants. AND, WHEREAS, the improvement of said street or streets, highway or highways, as shown and delineated on said map as by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto required and deemed as necessary for the public use has not been done or completed and said contractor shall as provided by Ordinance No. 673 of the City of San Jacinto, and by an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, entitled, "An Act relating to the real estate subdivisions and the making and recording of maps, and granting limited powers to cities and towns, and counties, in connection therewith, making certain acts misdemeanors, prescribing penalties therefore, and repealing acts or portions of acts in conflict herewith", enter into this Agreement with the City, whereby in consideration of the acceptance of the offers of dedication by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, the Contractor agrees to complete the work hereinafter in this agreement mentioned and set forth in detail to be done by contractor within the time hereinafter mentioned. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the acceptance of the offers of dedication of street and streets shown and delineated on said map and the approval of said map for filing and recording as provided and required by law, it is mutually agreed and understood by and between Contractor and Council do hereby mutually agree as follows: Page No. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1.8 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 1. That the City Council of the City of San Jacinto has fixed and does hereby fix the time within which contractor is to do and perform the work and improvements hereinafter stated and specified as being the period of time to expire between the date of this agreement and the 19th day of February 1992, and that contractor will, at his own cost and expense, including all costs of inspection or inspections done by the City of San Jacinto within the period of time hereinabove in Paragraph 1 of this agreement stated and fixed, do or cause to be done and performed the following described work and/or improvements to wit: All offsite improvements as shown on Approved Improvement Plans for Tract 24140. It is expressly agreed and understood by contractor that City shall inspect all said work to be done by an inspector employed by the City at the cost and expense of contractor and that contractor will pay unto City on demand the actual cost of such inspection. 2. All of the said work and improvements and the materials therefore shall be done, performed and installed in strict accordance with plans and specifications therefore on file which are hereby adopted and made a part of this agreement. 3. Contractor shall, at the time of the execution of this agreement present to and file with the City of San Jacinto a bond in the sum of SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTEEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FORTY TWO DOLLARS ($ 715,942.00) which sum it is hereby agreed is the sum fixed by the City of San Jacinto for that purpose, in accordance with the provisions of Section 11612 of the Business and Professional Code and Section 66499 et.seg. of the Government Code, conditioned upon the faithful performance by contractor of this agreement and by its terms made to inure the benefit of the City of San Jacinto and contractor shall also at the time present to and file with the City of San Jacinto, a good and sufficient bond in the sum of SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTEEN THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED FORTY TWO DOLLARS ($ 715,942.00) and by its terms made to inure to the benefit of laborer and material suppliers upon such work and improvements conditioned upon the payment of such laborer and material suppliers for labor and material performed or rendered under the terms of said contract, and for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor as provided by State Law. 4. Contractor shall before commencing any work as herein provided for, take out and at all times maintain during the course of such work, workmen's compensation insurance required by the laws of the State of California, and failing to do so, City may procure such insurance for said contractor and contractor shall pay City such monies as the City may be compelled to pay therefore. 5. Contractor shall save the City Council, City of San Jacinto, and the officers and employees of said City of San Jacinto, harmless against injuries to persons and damage to property, which may occur by reason or in connection with any work done as provided and contemplated by this agreement and contractor shall procure and carry at all times during the course of said work, liability insurance therefore in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000) in favor of contractor and City Council, City of San Jacinto, and the officers and employees of the City of San Jacinto as long as any work is being done as provided by this agreement. Page No. 2 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14I15 16 17 18. 19 11 20 I 211; 22 !i 231 2711 28 I 2911 3011 31/! 32 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, contractor, as parties of the first hereunto set their hands and the City Council has caused presents to be executed in the name of the city part, have of San Jacinto u these day and year in by its officers thereunto dulyCouncil of the City his agreement first above writtenthorized on the ATTEST: By Maurice D. Armster City Clerk Page No. 3 FIRST VICE P a SENT Carol Gallagher CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO By Francis A. Boykin Mayor A ORD. CERTI'FICA T E OF INSURANCE 469 ISSUE DATE (MM/DDIVY) 2-07-91 PRODUCER Marsh & McLennan One Woodward Avenue Suite #1200 Detroit, Michigan 48226-3493 CODE SUB -CODE INSURED First Nationwide Financial Corp. 700 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94102-2599 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERHFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED RY THE POLICIES BELOW COMPANY A LETTER COMPANY B LETTER COMPANY c LETTER COMPANY LETTER COMPANY E LETTER COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Continental Insurance Company ran COVERAGES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. :0 TR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER GENERAL LIABILITY X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS MADEX OCCUR. OWNER'S & CONTRACTORS PROT. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS GARAGE LIAB-:11TY EXCESS LIABILITY OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FOPM WORKER'S COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY OTHER SRL 5179395 None None None None POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION DATE (MM/DD/YY) DATE (MM/00/YY) 11/01/90 12/31/91 ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS GENERAL AGGREGATE .. $ 1,000, PRODUCTS-COMP/OPS .AGGREGATE $ 1 , 000, PERSONAL R. ADVERTISING INJURY S1,000, EACH OCCURRENCE s1,000, FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) 5 50, MEDICAL EXPENSE (Any one person) $ 5, COMBINED SINGLE 5 LIMIT BODILY INJURY 5 (Per person) BODILY INJURY 5 (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE S Not Applicable Not. Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable EACH AGGREGATE OCCURRENCE N/A STATUTORY N/A A N/A N/A N/A N/A (EACH ACCIDENT) (DISEASE —POLICY LIMIT) (DISEASE. -EACH EMPLOYEE) ESCP.IPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/RESTRICTIONS/SPECIAL ITEMS The City of San Jacinto and its appointed officials are hereby named as additionaliinsureds solely as respects their interest in the SUMMEP,CHASE DMA project located in San Jacinto, CA. Project ID: 845010598 / Tract No. 24140 ERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION CITY OF SAN JACINTO 201 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92383 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE OES.Ri0ED POLICIES BE CANCELLED B00O0.E THE EXP RATIOG DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVGR TO f.1f.IL3J_ DAYS WHITIEN NOTICE TO THE G'RTOGCA E HOLDER NAMED TO THE • LEFT 0110 FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL iMPOSE NO OSLI GAT'+`: OR LI FI _ITY 0;" AvY KIND 0000 THE" C00IPAN r ITS A00r S OP 00003SENTA O'0`.'ES. AUi Hi) ZES FiEPrHESENTAstYE ::ORO 25-S (3/88) , ACORC CORPORATION 199E Bond No.: 568 4379 Premium: $100.00 BOND EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 19, 1991 MONOMENTATION BOND WHEREAS, The City of San Jacinto, a municipal corporation of the County of Riverside, State of California, by its City Council, and First Nationwide Financial Corporation, as Principal have entered into an agreement whereby Principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, including the setting of interior monuments by an engineer or surveyor prior to a certain date and identified as Project San Jacinto/Summerchase, Tract 24140, ie hereby referred to and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, said Principal is required under the teiius of said agreement to furnish certain security guaranteeing payment of the cost of setting such interior monuments. NOW, THEREFORE, said Principal and the undersigned, Safeco Insurance Company of America, as Surety are held and firmly bound unto the City of San Jacinto and that engineer or surveyor, who set said interior monuments in the sum of Four Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty and 50/100ths Dollars ($4,960.50), for the services of setting said interior monuments; that said Surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon the bond, will pay, in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the Court, to be taxed as costs, and to be included in the judgment therein rendered. IT IS HEREBY EXPRESSLY STIPULATED AND AGREED that this bond shall inure to the benefit of said Engineer or Surveyor so as to give a right of action to it or its assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no extension of tiime for setting the interior monuments, or any alterations, changes or additions to the terms of said agreement, or the specifications accompanying the same, shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or addition; and hereby waives the defenses of the statutes of limitations, laches and estoppel for the grant or making of any said extensions, changes, alterations or addition to said agreement MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development SUBJ: ACCEPTANCE OF ROAD DEED FOR CORNER CUTOFF RIGHT OF WAY AND WATERLINE EASEMENT ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF RAMONA BLVD. AT TIGER LANE DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1991 Site Plan 90-16, a commercial development located on the northeast corner of Tiger Lane and Ramona Blvd, went to Staff Review on May 23, 1990 and was conditioned to provide a 15 foot waterline easement and a corner cutoff design on the property along Ramona Blvd. Staff recommends the City Council accept the road deed corner cutoff design and the easement from Stanly J. Kuhlengel and authorize its recordation with the County Recorder's Office. Respectfully submitted, _ ( L 474- (1/i BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development C' an aci,nto City Hall -- 201 East Main Street Post Office Box 488 San Jacinto, California 92383 714 - 654-7337 February 1, 1991 Stan Kuhlencel 534 Sobcba Avenue San Jacinto, Ca. SUBJ: TIGER PLAZA .)o Z. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL We are transmitting the follow_n WATERLINE EASEMENT AND ROAD DEDICATION Remarks: Please notarized document and return aourovai, than: ERIAM MC NALB r"i_-Gct:r or Community Development_ City for ': c L o r-t 4:71/ % s L- - Community Development RECORDING REQUESTED BY CITY OF 'SAN JACINTO 'JJD WHEN RECORDED HAIL TO, INCLUDING TAX STATEMENTS CITY OF SAN JACINTO P. 0. Box 488 San Jacinto, California 92383 —SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE ROAD DEED FOR A VALUABLE CO?NJSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Tiger Plaza Company hereby GRANT(S) to the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, an easement for public road and public utility purposes in the following described real property in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of California: See Attached Exhibit 'A' Together with the right to enter upon and to pass and repass over and along said easement and right of way and to deposit tools, implements, and other materials thereon, by said City, its officers, agents, and employees, and by any contractor, his agents and employees, engaged by said City, whenever and wherever necessary for the purposes above set forth. It is understood chat each undersigned grantor grants only that portion of the above describe_ land in which said grantor has an interest. Dated: C C y , 19 9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASS. COUNTY OF (k1F E on rc ir `i f `v.1 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared H V. c,u CG to personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name tS subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that 4�5 executed the same. WITNESS my hand and ,nfPi�: M1 Signature '\ Name —(Type, oor 'rinse OFFICIAL SEAL J. E. PETTON ITARY PJ800 CALIFORNIA RCIEFLSICE COUNTY fmm 6gew No,d, 20.I 992 C, u i c_._ This is to certify that the interest in real property.conveyed.by.the Deed dated from Tiger Plaza Company to the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, A MUNI- CIPAL CORPORATION and/or Govern- mental Agency, is hereby accepted by.order of.the City.Council on , and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: By CITY OF SAN JACINTO Mayor DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX...NONE (This area for official notarial seal) City Clerk, City of San Jacinto EXHIBIT 'A' CITY OF SAN JACINTO ROAD EASEMENT Being a portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 13983 as shown by Map on file in Book 60 of Parcel Maps, Page 82, Records of Riverside County, in the City of San Jacinto, State of California, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southerly most corner of said Parcel 1; THENCE North 45° 00' 00" West, along the Southwesterly line of said Parcel 1, said Southwesterly line being also the Northeasterly right-of-way line of Ramona Boulevard, a dis- tance of 64.99 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE North 01° 16' 59" East, a distance of 31.83 feet to the Northwesterly line of said Parcel 1; THENCE South 45° 01' 15" West, along said Northwesterly line a distance of 5.00 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Easterly having a radius of 18.00 feet; THENCE Southerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 90° 01' 15" a distance of 28.28 feet to the Southwesterly line of said Parcel 1; THENCE South 45° 00' 00" East, along the Southwesterly line of said Parcel 1, being also the Northeasterly right-of-way of said Ramona Boulevard, a distance of 4.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. JAMES W. l�^ U ‘Lyfi rL f V-. 1`02 Ex .ErGNEERING 12-31.93 ,/dr, Exp 12 /// ENGINEERING OF 33! CITY OF SAN JACINTO DEDICATION PLAT ;C pc_ Pi\j] 60/8 ...v.._ v¢61Voa:774•t d4.2�` I I-2d-''7 e L T JO °O/ "/5" /9.00 ' 2,5. 20 /B.O/ 45"Dpoo "i�/ James W. Unland & Associates CIVIL ENGINEERS 41640 East Florida Avenue, Suite C Hemet, CA 92344 (714) 652-5575 RECORDING REQUESTED BY , CITY OF SAN JACINTO ND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO, INCLUDING TAX STATEMENTS CITY OF SAN JACINTO .P. 0. Box 488 San Jacinto, California 92383 -SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE - EASEMENT DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Tiger Plaza Company hereby GRANT(S) to the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, an easement forforMMOCKOZOOON public utility purposes in the following described real property in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of California: See Attached Exhibit 'A' Together with the right to enter upon and to pass and repass over and along said easement and right of way and to deposit tools, implements, and other materials thereon, by said City, its officers, agents, and employees, and by any contractor, his agents and employees, engaged by said City, whenever and wherever necessary for the purposes above set forth. It is understood that each undersigned grantor grants only that portion of the above described land in which said grantor has an interest. Dated: i<1 STATE OF CA.LIFORNIA rl COUNTY OF hIOr.RSiDE , 19 `n ASS. On a;. `, �ltl } before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared JIA N LC4 1, HLLUV�L personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name y subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that _ IA( executed the same. WITNESS rty „and and official seal. Name (Typed oi-Printed) Signatur Orr CUL SEAL 3. E PETTON rumor w %a r. cAuoervu i E5iOECCUMV CE.ri ,M ;20,1792 This is to certify that the interest in real property.conveyed.by.the Deed dated from Tiger Plaza Company to the CITY OF SAN JACINTO,.A MUNI- CIPAL CORPORATION and/or Govern- mental Agency, is hereby accepted by -order of the City -Council on , and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: Cy CITY 01' SAN JACI_NTO Mayor DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX...NONE (This area for official notarial seal) City Clerk, City of San Jacinto EXHIBIT 'A' CITY OF SAN JACINTO WATERLINE EASEMENT SITE PLAN NO. 16-90 Being a portion of Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map No. 13983 as shown by Map on file in Book 60 of Parcel Maps, Page 82, Records of Riverside County, in the City of San Jacinto, State of California, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Westerly most corner of said Parcel 2, said corner being also the Southerly most corner of said Parcel 1; THENCE South 45° 00' 00" East along the Southwesterly line of said Parcel 2, said Southwesterly line being also the Northeasterly right-of-way line of Ramona Boulevard, a distance of 128.99 feet; THENCE North 45° 00' 00" East, a distance of 15.00 feet; THENCE North 45° 00' 00" West, parallel with the South lines of said Parcels 1 and 2, a distance of 208.32 feet; THENCE South 01° 16' 59" West, a distance of 20.75 feet to the Southwesterly line of said Parcel 1; THENCE South 45° 00' 00" East, along the Southwesterly line of said Parcel 1 and the Northeasterly line of said right-of-way, a distance of 64.99 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CITY OF SAN JACINTO GRANT OF EASEMENT PLAT FOR TIGER PLAZA CO. SJ-r 5"0020 8.32 NININFAIN1111111rAtir AdV Al 5 aril/ • N0/"/G`594 20.?5' RAMONA C \kOrrES O. JAMES W 02 C xp. 12.31.03 B LV D. J wu II-15-9O James W. Unland & Associates CIVIL E N G I N E E R 41640 East Florida Avenue, Suite C Hemet, CA 92344 (714) 652-5575 .PA/ / - 7S/c MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: February 15, 1991 SUBJ: RELEASE OF MONUMENT BONDS FOR TRACT 12152-1 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF IDYLLWILD DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET EAST OF STATE STREET. Forcast Corporation has formally requested the release of monument bonds for Tract 12152-1. The monuments for Tract 12152-1 have been inspected and found to be completed in substantial compliance with plans and specifications. Staff therefore recommends the release of the monument bonds in full. Respectfully Submitted, Brian McNabb Director of Community Development MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager FROM: Henry Garcia, Assistant City Manager DATE: February 15, 1991 SUBJECT: CDBG 17th Year Information As background information, the City of San Jacinto held a public meeting at our Community Center on January 31, 1991. At the public meeting, the City received public testimony and approximately 124 completed CDBG Needs Assessment Forms submitted by all interested individuals attending the meeting. In addition, the City Council held a formal Public Hearing on February 5, 1991, to receive additional public testimony regarding the CDBG program for the 17th year. Based upon the public testimony and the information submitted at both meetings, Staff has developed a matrix (see attached) which lists the organizations who are requesting CDBG funds, the contact person, the amount requested, the proposed use of the funds and a determination of whether or not a particular organization is defined as a public service. Furthermore, Staff has developed a separate analysis of the public meeting responses for the Council's review (see attached). After reviewing the various projects with the Riverside County staff, the Council should note that the San Jacinto High School/Student Body CDBG request has been determined to be an ineligible project. This decision based on the presumption that the purchase of computer equipment to provide high school students with extensive college, career and vocational data should be an existing function of the school district and the Department of Education. In addition, the Council should note that Staff cannot determine whether or not the San Jacinto Valley School of the Arts meets the criteria to receive CDBG funds. In other words, the school's eligibility criteria cannot be determined without support data illustrating their ability to benefit 51% of the citizens who qualify as low/moderate income residents. Finally, the County of Riverside has also determined that the San Jacinto Valley Museum does not qualify to receive CDBG funds based on the museum's inability to meet the criteria outlined in this memorandum. 1 Page Two CDBG Funds In addition, at the Council Meeting on February 5, Staff submitted correspondence to the Council regarding possible City public works projects. At this time, Staff has removed one of the four projects listed in that correspondence. In particular, the project removed from Staff's request is the resolution of the drainage problem on the north end of Jordan Avenue at Artesia. The removal of this item comes after carefully prioritizing the projects. To assist the City Council in their decision making, it should be pointed out that an activity or service may be assisted in whole or in part with CDBG funds only if one or more of the following criteria are met: 1. Recipients of CDBG funds must benefit a minimum of 51% low/moderate income families. 2. Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or 3. The funds may be used to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health and welfare of the community. Some of the basic eligible activities are: Acquisition: Acquisition in whole or in part by the recipient, or other public or private non-profit entity by purchase, by lease, donation, or otherwise, of real property. Disposition: Disposition, through sale, lease, donation, or otherwise, of any real property acquired with CDBG funds or its retention for public purposes. Public Facilities Improvements: Acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation or installation of public facilities or improvements. Clearance Activities: Clearance, demolition, and removal of buildings and improvements, including movement of structures to other sites. Public Services: Public Service is defined as those services which are directed toward improving the community's public services and facilities including, but not limited to, those concerned with employment, crime prevention, child care, health, drug abuse, education, fair housing counseling, energy conservation, welfare or recreational needs. 2 Page Three CDBG Funds In order to be eligible for CDBG assistance, public services must meet the following criteria: (A) A public service must be either a new service or an existing service which demonstrates a quantifiable, increase in the level of service above that which is provided by or in behalf of the unit of general local government. (B) The amount of CDBG funds used for public services shall not exceed 15% of the total CDBG allotment. With regard to the attachments, the matrix shows that the total project costs requested is $329,125.00. The 17th year CDBG allocation is only $98,328.00. This represents a shortfall of $230,797.00. The matrix also outlines the fact that only a maximum of $14,749.00 (15% of CDBG allotment) can be utilized for public services. Should the Council allocate the entire $14,749.00 to public services, the remaining balance of $83,579.00 will be left for City capital projects. With respect to the public meeting attachment, the analysis illustrates a breakdown of the activities/services eligible to receive CDBG funds. These activities/services are ranked numerically in terms of priority. Staff has also provided a voting talley by each ranked priority. The Council should note that the high ranking of the Senior Center and Community Center can be attributed to the fact that the public meeting was held in conjunction with the Senior Guild Meeting. I trust that this memorandum will assist the City Council in their selection process. Based upon the Council's request, Staff has not provided recommendations on how to utilize CDBG funds. This correspondence is a summary of information only. Organization Requesting Funds ORGANIZATIONS REQUESTING FUNDS MATRIX NUMBER ONE (1) Proposed Use of Funds Eligible Public Amount Service Activity Requested Senior Day Care Center 625 So. Pico Avenue San Jacinto Contact: Jean Adamache Valley Restart Shelter P.O. Box 171.5 Hemet Contact: Jeanette Arnquist Subsidize day care cost for the elderly YES $ 5,000 Develop job training/ YES 5,000 placement/development programs for the honeless and low/moderate income citizens San Jacinto High School Purchase of computer to provide NO 2,500 Student Body students with college, vocational 500 idyllwild information San Jacinto Contact: Maya Garcia San Jacinto Valley School of the Arts 769 San Jacinto Ave. San Jacinto Contact: Patti Muniain Salaries, equipment, overhead /expenses and possible scholarships As determined by 5,000 County of Riverside, the School of the Arts° eligibility to receive funds cannot be deter- mined with the preliminary data submitted Phoenix House To lease a house in San Jacinto YES 4,000 28120 So. State St. for citizens who have a mental, Hemet emotional or chemical dependency Contact: Peggy Rose_ Organization Requesting Funds ORGANIZATIONS REQUESTING FUNDS MATRIX NUMBER ONE (1) Proposed Use of Funds Eligible Public Service Activity Amount Requested San Jacinto Valley Museum 181 E. Main St. San Jacinto Contact: N/A Valley Teen Project 901 W. Esplanade San Jacinto Contact: Collette Salisbury City of San Jacinto Water Department 201 E. Main St. San Jacinto City of San Jacinto Water Department 201 E. Main St. San Jacinto M To acquire additional NO building/expansion space To start a graffiti YES abatement program SUB -TOTAL SERVICE PROJECTS Capital Projects Replace water mains at: (1) Vernon between Main St./7th St. (2) Andrews Ave. between 5th/7th (3) Soboba Ave. between 5th/7th (4) 5th St. between Vernon & Soboba Ave. Note: The aforementioned streets listed constitute one project The total linear footage for this project is 3,696 or $58.00 per linear foot = $150,000 a) Engineering fees - 10% b) Contingency fees - 15% 15,000 22,500 $187,500 Supplement to the 7th St. sewer/water project; these funds will be for engineering services. Unknown $ 5,000 $ 26,500 $187,500 15,000 Organization Requesting Funds ORGANIZATIONS REQUESTING FUNDS MATRIX NUMBER ONE (1) Proposed Use of Funds Eligible Public Service Activity Amount Requested , City of San Jacinto Community Center 625 So. Pico Ave. San Jacinto City of San Jacinto Public Works Dept. 201 E. Main St. San Jacinto Capital Projects To add an additional room to the existing Community Center Install sewer mains at: 1. Camino Los Banos - 1320' a. b. c. Sewer at $30.00 per ft. Engineering fees @ 10% Contingency @ 15% 2. Cecelia Dr. - 860' a. Sewer at $30.00 per ft. b. Engineering fees @ 10% c. Contingency fees @ 15% 3. 5th Street - 290' a. Sewer at $30.00 per ft. b. Engineering fees @ 10% c. Contingency fees @ 15% = $ 39,600 3,960 5,940 TOTAL $ 49,500 = $ 25,800 2,580 3,870 TOTAL $ 32,250 $ 8,700 870 1,305 TOTAL $ 10,875 NOTE: The Gas Tax Fund will pay for the asphalt removal and re- placement of the streets 7,500 92,625 SUB -TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECTS GRAND TOTAL - ALL PROJECTS CDBG-17th YEAR ALLOCATION 15% MAX. ALLOC. TO PUB. SERV. SHORTFALL $ 302,625.00 329,125.00 98,328.00 14,749.00 $ 230,797.00 PUBLIC MEETING ANALYSIS ATTACHMENT NUMBER II ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES OR SERVICES VOTE 1. Senior Center 68 2. Water Lines/Roads 63-63 3. Community Center 55 4. Sidewalks, Curbs & Gutters 45 5. Sewer Lines 40 6. Handicapped Facilities 39 7. Flood Control 33 8. Public Service Programs 24 9, Business Development/Fire Protection 23-23 10. Child Care Facilities 21 11. Street Lights 20 12. Repair Housing 15 13. Parks 13 14. New Housing 11 MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DAIE: February 14, 1991 SUBJ: Resolution 1934 and Annexation 65 Annexation 65 has recently been approved by LAFCO on December 6, 1990. The City Council then requested that a public hearing be held prior to ordering annexation. A public hearing has been set allowing for public comments related to the proposed annexation. Following public testimony the City Council may order annexation of the subject property to occur. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the approval of Resolution 1934 ordering the area known as annexation 65 to be annexed into the City of San Jacinto. Respectfully Submitted, BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. 1934 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN INHABITED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF BAN JACINTO (ANNEXATION NO. 65) WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission of the county of Riverside adopted its Resolution No. 66-90 on the 6th day of December 1990, making determinations and approving the proposed annexation to the city of San Jacinto of territory described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the terms and conditions of annexation as approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission are set forth in Exhibit "B" hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposed annexation are: 1. The proposal represents a logical and orderly extension of the boundaries of the City of San Jacinto. 2, The City of San Jacinto is capable of providing improved municipal services to the Territory. 3. The annexation is proposed in order to provide municipal services by the City of San Jacinto for the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, the regular county assessment roll is utilized by this City; and WHEREAS, the affected territory will not be taxed for existing general bonded indebtedness of this City; and WHEREAS, the City Council certifies that the Planning Commission of the City of San Jacinto has performed the required environmental review and has granted a Negative Declaration pursuant to City policy; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on this annexation was called for and held by this Council at the place and time notice therefore on February 19, 1991, and this Council finds and determines that the value of written protests filed and not withdrawn is less than that of landowners owning 50 percent of the assessed value of the land within the territory. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Jacinto hereby orders the territory described in Exhibit "A" annexed, and directs the City clerk to transmit a certified copy of this resolution with applicable fees required by Section 54902.5 of the Government Code to the executive officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County. 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 19th day of February, 1991, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST Deputy City Clerk Mayor CERTIFICATE The forgoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. 1934 duly adopted by the said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein. Deputy City Clerk Exhibit "A" ANNEXATION NO. 65 TO THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO 1 i^-Fco No. 90-38-3 Being the Southwest quarter of Section 28, the Southeast quarter of Section 29 and the Northeast quarter of Section 32 of Township 4 South, Range 1 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the centerline intersection of Cottonwood Avenue and Lyon Avenue as shown by Parcel Map on file in Book 37, Page 76 of Parcel Maps, Riverside County Records, California; THENCE Westerly along the centerline of Cottonwood Avenue a distance of 2640 feet more or less to the centerline intersection of Cottonwood Avenue and Kirby Street; THENCE Southerly along the centerline of Kirby Street a distance of 2640 feet more or less to the centerline intersection of Kirby Street and Seventh Street; THENCE Westerly along the centerline of Seventh Street a distance of 2640 feet more or less to the centerline intersection of Seventh Street and Sanderson Avenue; THENCE Northerly along the centerline of Sanderson Avenue a distance of 5,280 feet more or less to the center of said Section 29; THENCE Easterly a distance of 5280 feet more or less to the centerline of said Section 28, said point also being on the centerline of Lyon Avenue; THENCE Southerly along the centerline of Lyon Avenue a distance of 2640 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Area equals 480 acres, more or less. THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION APPROVED (99 BY RI E SIDE/} COUNTY SURVEYOR 6Y a-L1J L_-S - Q J.r12C112..— Exp- 12-31-93 CAVIL ENGINEERING ATTACHMENT "B" 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 13 14. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RIVERSIDE AGENCY FORMATION COMM/SSION SUMO C.LHON S-742"..T 42TH FLOOR 92501•3651 Local Agency Formation Commission County of Riverside RESOLUTION NO. 86-90 APPROVING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO LAFCO NO. 90-38-3 BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the Local Agency Formation Commission in regular session assembled on December 6, 1990, that the annexation of approximately 480 acres generally located south of Scott Road, west of Lyons Avenue, east of Sanderson Avenue and north of Seventh Street, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof, is approved subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND FOUND that: 1. Commission proceedings were commenced by resolution of application by the City of San Jacinto. 2. The annexation is proposed to provide more municipal services by the City of San Jacinto. 3. The distinctive short form designation of the proposed annexation is LAFCO No. 90-38-3, Annexation No. 65 to City of San Jacinto. 4. An environmental assessment was made op the proposal and a negative declaration filed thereon by the City of San Jacinto pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The negative declaration has been reviewed and considered and is hereby adopted. n d z D 0 < <=, 2 z G.; Lt 0 0 C- 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 0 24111° 24 25 2 6 2,7 2. 5. The boundaries of the territory as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, have been approved by the County Surveyor, are contiguous to the City of San Jacinto, and are approved. 6. The territory to be annexed is inhabited, there being more than 12 registered voters residing therein. 7. The annexation is approved subject to the following terms and conditions: a. The City of San Jacinto must file a complete application for annexation of the corridor area as described in the staff report south to Cottonwood Avenue. • b. The City must adopt a resolution indicating its intent to form an assessment district for flood control purposes. c. The City must adopt a resolution to require as a part of any development approvals that any project approved within the annexation area be included within such assessment district. d. The City must execute an agreement with the County for maintenance of Cottonwood Avenue from Kirby Street east to the City limits. 10. The proposed annexation is consistent with the City of San Jacinto's sphere of influence and the spheres of influence of all other affected local agencies. 11. The City of San Jacinto is designated conducting authority. 12. The Executive Officer is directed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the above -designated conducting authority, to the chief petitioners, if different from the conducting authority, and to--e-aCh affected agency. / E, GILLAR BO , Chairman I certify the above resolution was passed and adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County on December 6, 1990. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EO GE Exeiiti Officer CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: DESCRIPTION PLANNING COMMISSION TRANSMITTAL TO CITY COUNCIL February 19, 1991 VARIANCE 6-90 APPLICANT: HERITAGE RANCH R.V. PARK 800 W. Community College Drive San Jacinto, CA 92383 A request for a review and amendment of Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 8-82. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council ratify the approval of Variance 6-90 subject to the staff report and findings of fact. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached for your review are copies of the following documents: - minutes of the January 8, 1991 City Council meeting - amended Conditions of Approval following the November 1990 Planning Commission meeting staff report of November 14, 1990 PC meeting current conditons of approval 14, 1-8-91 Minutes Page 3 Councilwoman Leahy noted that the recording of the votes for the Introduction of Ordinance Nos. 924, 925 and 926 had not been included on the Ordinance copy. Council was advised that on introduction Ordinance No. 924 had carried 4-0 (Councilman Rose being out of the room), Ordinance No. 925 carried 5-0 and Ordinance No. 926 carried 4-1 (Councilwoman Leahy abstaining). Councilman Rose requested that in future the Council receive a more detailed breakdown on payments made for service charges, i.e., engineering, etc. Motion by Councilman Rose to approve consent calendar items A through P (less 0), adopt Ordinance Nos. 922, 924, 925 and 926 and waive the readings in full. Seconded by Councilman Ford. Motion carried: 5-0. 0. Ratification of Variance 6-90, an amendment to Conditional Use Permit 8-82. (Planning Commission recommends approval.) Brian McNabb made a presentation on Heritage Ranch's request for an amendment of conditions of approval going through the requested amendments. Wallace Hill, Space 98 at Heritage Ranch, spoke before Council in opposition of amendment to CUP. Councilman Hafliger inquired if Heritage Ranch was a Recreational Vehicle Park? Mr. McNabb stated, no, that this park does is not considered a recreational vehicle park under the definition within Title 25 of the California Administrative Code. As a great deal of negative comments were being expressed from the audience, in response to the speaker's comments, the following motion was made: Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to cease debate at this time. Seconded by Mayor Boykin. Motion carried 4-1 (Hafliger dissenting). Motion by Councilman Ford to set a Public Hearing on this item. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Motion carried 5-0. At 8:25 p.m., Mayor Boykin called a five minute recess. Meeting reconvened at 8:30 p.m. AMENDED CONDITIONS (PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 11/14/90) CUP 8-82 Conditions of Approval (as amended November 1990) 1. Comply with all conditions of Tentative Tract 18314. 2. No lot shall be less than 1850 sq. ft. No lot shall be less than 1500 sq. ft. adjacent to the knuckle or cul-de-sac. 3 The front yard setback shall be not less than five ft. The side yard setback shall not be less than three ft. except that on corner lots, the street side setback for the R.V. pad or the parking slab shall be not less than five ft. The rear setback shall not be less than five ft. No parking or storage shall take place within the required side or rear setbacks or within any required landscaped area. 4. a. Awnings, decks, screen rooms and enclosed rooms are allowed for those residents who keep their R.V. permanently parked on the lot 12 months of the year. All such accessory structures shall meet the Uniform Building Code. b. Any free standing structure shall be constructed of wood, and cannot exceed the height of the R.V. roof. All structures shall meet the Uniform Building Code. c. Washers and dryers shall be allowed only in a storage room. Permits shall be obtained for plumbing and electricity necessary to establish such laundry facilities. However, no clotheslines shall be allowed. 5. No mobilehome will be allowed within this subdivision unless placed on a lot in conformance with standard mobilehome park setbacks. The number of mobilehomes shall not exceed two (2). Mobilehomes shall only accommodate the subdivision manager and assistant manager. 6. Each lot shall have a permanently concrete surfaced parking area of not less than 250 sq. ft. beyond the front setback. 7 Subject development shall be limited to adults only. 8. No recreational vehicle less than 24 feet shall be allowed as the main R.V. on any lot within the subdivision. STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Hixson and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: November 14, 1990 SUBJ: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT VARIANCE 6-90 APPLICANT: HERITAGE RANCH R.V. PARK 800 W. Community College San Jacinto, CA 92383 DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting to amend the conditions on the R.V. Park Conditional Use Permit. DISCUSSION This item was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of June 13, 1990. The issue for discussion involves current Conditions of Approval. The park is within a R-T, Residential Trailer zone. The purpose of the R-T zone is to promote and encourage a suitable environment for family living on individual parcels of land to be used for single-family mobilehome subdivided lots and accessory uses. An R.V. park must obtained a C.U.P. to the R-T zone to allow for the R.V. park use. The purpose of the C.U.P. is to allow sufficient flexibility in the use regulations in order to further the objectives of the zoning ordinance and specifically the article relating to the R-T zone in this instance. Letters related to this issue received since the June Planning Commission meeting are included within. On November 6, 1990, staff visited the site once again to evaluate the situation. The residents of the subdivisions have governed the park very well to this point and hopefully this trend will continue. The most glaring situation were lots that had a park model, an R.V., and a car all on the same lot. However, this seemed to be accomplished all within the required setbacks. Planning Commission November 14, 1990 Page No. 1 Staff proposes to amend the conditions to Conditional Use Permit 8-82. The purpose of the proposed amendments is to ensure compliance with minimum ordinance requirements. The amended conditions also allow flexibility and enforcement of more stringent requirements be determined by the Park Architectural Board. The proposed amended conditions read as follows: Conditions of Approval (amended November 1990) Conditional Use Permit 8-82. 1. Comply with all conditions of Tentative Tract 18314. 2. No lot shall be less than 1850 sq. ft. No lot shall be less than 1500 sq. ft. adjacent to the knuckle or cul-de-sac. 3. The front yard setback shall be not less than five ft. The side yard setback shall not be less than three ft. except that on corner lots, the street side setback for the R.V. pad or the parking slab shall be not less than five ft. The rear setback shall not be less than five ft. 4. a. Awnings, decks, screen rooms and enclosed rooms are allowed for those residents who keep their R.V. permanently parked on the lot 12 months of the year. All such accessory structures shall meet the Uniform Building Code. b. Any free standing structure shall be constructed of wood, and cannot exceed the height of the R.V. roof. All structures shall meet the Uniform Building Code. c. Washers and dryers shall be allowed only in a storage room. Permits shall be obtained for plumbing and electricity necessary to establish such laundry facilities. However, no clotheslines shall be allowed. 5. No mobilehome will be allowed within this subdivision unless placed on a lot in conformance with standard mobilehome park setbacks. The number of mobilehomes shall not exceed two (2). Mobilehomes shall only accommodate the subdivision manager and assistant manager. 6. Each lot shall have a permanently concrete surfaced parking area of not less than 250 sq. ft. beyond the front setback. 7. No boat, trailer, or any other such recreational vehicle, (including campers, and R.V. accessories such as camper shells) shall be stored or parked within the required side or rear setbacks. Planning Commission November 14, 1990 Page No. 2 8. Subject development shall be limited to adults only. 9. No recreational vehicle less than 24 feet shall be allowed as the main R.V. on any lot within the subdivision. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the revised conditions amended as shown. Respectfully, Brian McNabb Director of Community Development Planning Commission November 14, 1990 Page No. 3 MINUTES City of San Jacinto Pia 4 ,eeting The regular meeting of the San Jacinto Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Hixson at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 209 East Main Street, San Jacinto, California. 1 FLAG SALUTE II ROLL CALL: led by Chairman Hixson Comnissioners Present: Also Present: III APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes approved as MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: IV BUSINESS ITEMS Culbertson, Polak, Westall, Wilson and Chairman Hixson Brian McNabb, Community Development Linda Jo Rose, Secretary Pro-Tempore of the meeting on March 5, 1984 were submitted. Commissioner Westall Commissioner Culbertson 5-0 1. Conditional Use Permit 8-82 APPLICANT: Heritage Land Company Request for clarification of Condition No. 5 of Conditional Use Per- mit 8-82 concerning accessory structures. Following Brian McNabb's Staff Report the Commissioners discussed the wording of Condition No. 5. along with Wally Dalzell and 0rvi1 N. Hovdey, who represented the R.V. Park. MOTION SECOND ACTION 5. a. b. c. Commissioner Wilson made a motion to approve the change of wording of Condition No. 5 as stated below. Commissioner Culbertson Motion passed; 5-0 Awnings, decks, screen rooms and enclosed rooms are allowed. All such accessory structures shall meet the Uniform Building Code. Any free standing structure shall be constructed of wood, and cannot exceed the height of the R.V. roof. All such struc- tures shall meet the Uniform Building Code. Washers and dryers shall be allowed ONLY in the allowed stor- age shed. Permits shall be obtained for plumbing and elec- tricity necessary to establish such laundry facilities. How- ever, no clothesline shall be allowed. March /, /982 Planning Comnission Meeting. - Page 3 • 7. Each lot shall have a pernianentky concrete surfaced parking area of not less than 250 sq. ft. beyond the front setback. ., • 8- 80 boat. trailer. or any other such recreatioa7 vehicle, other on any lot. than the main recreational vehicle • -- to be lived In. shall be Parked 9. Subject development shall be limited to adults only. • - ' ' lO. No recreational vehicle less-iban 24 ft. shall be allowed as the main R.V, ozrany lot within the subdivision. • - '. • Conditions of royal As Revised for Teniative Tract /8374 ... . The followingls to ppear. curthe Map i .' recorded si- oultanedusly vith the FIJI maps. . ''''-'"--''' : tn Pr .s..-t° be °cation of arty known Zone *A"-noocf lng in accordance with .•. - .r*.. The statement *Street ded. 'cations are -no'' eaCcepted by th .. -, ty of San Jacinto. until all,publIc improvements are complete.* ..,,,. 7-- --•••-:.7ia••••=- • 7 ' •-•-:--"" """" The statement -"This subdivision 'is"Valid tor:recreational ..-- vehicles nd.thefr accessorys only.* Any change in use _ flakes thfi land sion null and void. 2. Flood hezarti protection shall. be:as ePecified fn envirOrmental .eonditfons l and 2. -. 1.. . - . * 3.* Applicant shill 7ocate and remove all.,existing-septIc tanks:. - ' otherwise approved leach fields, dry wells and other pits'Or drain lines unless • . 4. Applicant shall obtain denbalition permits for-therazing-of the existing buildings on the site., -..•----.,:.,,, f -.:''' -::- . . ---- ' All lots shal/ be graded to drain to the streetspr comwm area . • Engineer's colcu7otions on. kydrology shall be proVided to verify and design onsite and offsite drainage facilities. . Obtain City approval ot said calculations.• • .. ..,,,.;:. 7. Acquiri-downstreau ealesents Or 4ttheryrise allow for added flows 8. All Interior water ines sha/I bilooped. 9. Thl e wattr $ystem shall be designed to-ailott tile ci ty to serve the subdivision at a later dat MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: February 15, 1991 SUBJ: Annexation 66 Funding Assistance Annexation 66 is the west side proposal incorporating approximately 6,000 acres generally located between Sanderson Avenue and Warren Road, northerly of Esplanade Avenue. This project started approximately a year ago due to the property owners' desires to consolidate for the purposes of annexation. After a number of meetings, it was decided the City would be the lead agent in facilitating the annexation. The property owners were to pay all associated costs. Contracts were executed as follows: 1. NBS/Lowry - project coordination and application preparation $86,800.00 2. Turini & Brink - General Plan and Zoning Plan $40,200.00 3. Ultra Systems - Environmental Impact Report $142,790.00 4. Christensen & Wallace - Fiscal Impact Study $8,500.00 With these contracts in hand, the steering committee determined the contracts would be financed via an assessment of $40 per acre on all property owners. As most property owners had been contacted and few objected, the committee felt most property owners would gladly participate, particularly as the assessment could be paid in four installments. What had not been factored into the financing equation were the filing fees for the general plan amendment, the change of zone, sphere of influence, and the annexation. These fees are approximately $130,000 - $140,000. Also not anticipated was the level of non -participation of the property owners. The committee has now requested the City assist them in paying the costs of annexation. The request was considered and discussed with a Council Subcommittee of Councilman Ford and Councilwoman Leahy. Paying the costs without the potential of reimbursement was ruled out. Other financing options explored were: 1. Reimbursement through an assessment district 2. Reimbursement through a recorded note on property 3. Creation of reimbursement agreement, establishing a method of fee repayment. Research revealed an assessment district would result in only partial reimbursement so was ruled out. A note on the property, promising to pay the fair share for that property was possible only if owners consented to the recordation of the note. Also, the note would be in a junior lien, so could drop off in the case of foreclosure. Therefore, this method wasn't feasible either. The creation of a reimbursement agreement seemed to be the most feasible and fair. The concept is to divide the total costs of the annexation by the number of acres and determine the cost per acre. The City would agree to defer the cost of the NBS/Lowry contract and the filing fees. The property owners will pay all other consulting bills, totalling about $200,000. However, owners would receive credit for their payments for consulting services project. A rough draft of a resolution implementing such a fee is attached for your reference. Staff and the steering committee are looking for direction from the Council. If you are willing to defer the fee and create the reimbursement fee, staff will finalize the wording of the resolution. The Council should be aware such a decision is not without risk. By deferring the fees, the City is becoming a partner with the property owners, assuming the same risk as they do. This risk is primarily, that the annexation may be rejected or modified by LAFCO. Should this occur, the City would not be reimbursed unless the property ultimately annexed and developed in the City. Although this risk exists, staff feels it is the recommended plan of action. Respectfully Submitted, /-) , BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM:lr RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO AUTHORIZING DEFERRED PAYMENT OF FEES RELATED TO REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION NO. 66 RECITALS WHEREAS, Government Code Sections 54990 and 54992 authorize a City to impose fees based upon the reasonable cost of providing services related to zone changes, the filing and processing of applications for reorganization, the processing of maps, or other planning services; and WHEREAS, San Jacinto City Ordinance No. 622, April 18, 1978, prescribes the procedures and further authorizes the establishment of fees for the administration of planning, zoning and subdivision applications; and WHEREAS, all of the property owners contained within Proposed Annexation No. 66 (as described in the attached. Exhibit "A") have requested to be annexed within the City of San Jacinto; and WHEREAS, in processing the proposed Annexation No. 66, the services of City staff and outside consultants will be required to perform planning functions including, but not limited to, the preparation and processing of the annexation request, the preparation and processing of a General Plan Amendment and pre - annexation zone changes, environmental investigation, preparation of draft and final environmental impact reports, preparation of land -use plans and circulation plans, and preparation of a fiscal impact report. The list of services to be provided and the estimated costs thereof in the annexation and planning process are contained in Exhibit 11E111 attached hereto; and WHEREAS, all of the services to be provided by the City and the consultants herein, will cause a financial benefit to property values in the annexed area, and will provide basic and valuable planning services for future development and infrastructure for the area; and WHEREAS, the costs listed in Exhibit "B" are the estimated reasonable costs for which the within fees are calculated and No. said fees will not exceed such estimated reasonable costs; and WHEREAS, all property owners within proposed Annexation 66 should share equally in the estimated reasonable costs attributable attributable The said per to the project, and that said costs should be evenly over the square acreage within the project. acre fee is therefore $ ; and WHEREAS, the property owners of the parcels listed in the attached Exhibit "C" consisting of a total of acres have previously paid their share of the reasonable estimated costs of the project and the property owners of the remaining parcels listed in the attached Exhibit "D" have not paid their share of such costs; and WHEREAS, the City is willing to advance the funds necessary for completion of the project as were not previously collected from the owners of parcels listed in Exhibit "D", and -2- to defer collection thereof to a time no later than the presentation of any application for development, building, zoning, permit or any other discretionary action requested by the property owner or developer; and WHEREAS, by reason of said deferment of charges, the City will incur expenses for collection, administration and accounting which is reasonably estimated to be 20% of the adjusted per acre fee listed above. Further, by reason of such deferment, City will lose the investment value of the money so advanced and that the reasonable value of such loss is estimated at 6% per annum, or the increase in the consumer price index for the Los Angeles Area Wage Earners and Consumers, adjusted annually from the date hereof, whichever is greater. The 20% administration, collection and accounting fee shall be computed upon the base tee after annual adjustment as provided herein; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted to consider this resolution and public testimony was taken on , 1991. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO AS FOLLOWS: 1. Pursuant to the authority of Government Code Sections 54990, 54992 and San Jacinto City Ordinance 622 there is hereby imposed a one-time fee of $ per acre within all territory located within proposed Annexation No. 66 as described in the attached Exhibit "A". Said fee is immediately due and payable by all property owners within said area and shall be paid in an -3- amount equal to the per acre fee multiplied by the number of acres owned by each property owner. 2. In the event any property owner fails to pay the fee imposed by June 1, 1991, City agrees that such fee may be deferred to a date no later than the presentation of any application for development, building, zoning, permit or any other discretionary action effecting the property as requested by the then property owner or developer; bow -ever such fee shall first be adjusted annually at the rate of 6% per annum, or at the rate of the increase in the consumer price index for all wage earners and consumers in the Los Angeles Area (whichever is greater). Further, there shall be assessed a 20% fee to cover City's costs of collection, accounting and administration based upon the total fee then due after annual adjustment. Adopted the day of , 1991. ATTEST: MAURICE ARMSTER, City Clerk City Of San Jacinto MAYOR, CITY OF SAN JACINTO By: -4.. CERTIFICATE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA: The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of a resolution duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date therein mentioned. MAURICE ARMSTER, City Clerk City of San Jacinto BY: -5- MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: February 15, 1991 SUBJ: Request for use of Redevelopment Agency Housing Finds to Rehabilitate the Vosburg Hotel Attached is a letter from Housing for Independent People (HIP) requesting the use of Redevelopment Agency Housing Funds to assist in the acquisition of the Vosburg Hotel. HIP plans to rehabilitate the existing structure and to construct new units on the north side of Third Street. These funds are generated from the state mandate that the first 20 percent of redevelopment tax increment be set aside to assist low and moderate income households. The Economic Development subcommittee and Staff met with Neil Stone, representing HIP, to discuss the project. As outlined in the attached drawing, the project consists of the construction of 44 new units and the rehabilitation of existing hotel to 39 rooms. Of the 83 total units on the site, 71 were planned for rental to lower income senior citizens and/or handicapped persons. HIP had not decided who would occupy the remaining twelve units. The committee determined the primary issues of concern with the request were: 1. The RDA was being asked to advance the money to assist in the purchase of the land which would result in lost interest revenue to the City over the one to two year construction period. 2. The RDA could expect little return on the investment as the request was essentially for a grant. 3. The unknown factor of who would occupy the undesignated 12 units. 4. The lack of a specific plan to deal with indigent residents that were no longer capable of living independently. 5. The request would deplete the existing housing fund. As a result of these issues, the subcommittee concluded they were in favor of the concept of using housing funds to assist in the revitalization of the Vosburg Hotel. However, due to the issues identified previously, they did not feel they could recommend the Council grant the request, as submitted. If HIP can adequately address the identified issues, including restructuring the financing request, the subcommittee was open to reconsidering the request. Respectfully Submitted, BRIAN MC NABS Director of Community Development BKM:lr EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Al DiLugovico PRESIDENT John Lococo VICE PRESIDENT — TREASURER Kerry Williams SECRETARY Carol Murphy MEMBERS Larry Bergheim Stewart Tulloch John Thielmann Richard Condon Linda Condon Edward W'alin Bruce Ellithorpe Paul Woodall HOUSING FOR INDEPENDENT PEOPLE, INC. A NON PROFIT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Serving Northern California Phone (408) 283-2200 FAX (408) 283-2249 December 20, 1990 Pamela S. Easter City Manager - Redevelopment Executive Director City and Redevelopment Agency of San Jacinto Post Office Box 488 San Jacinto, California 92383 ATTENTION OF: Brian McNabb Community Development Director DEC 2 4 1990 Community Development SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR USE OF REDEVELOPMENT LOW / MODERATE INCOME HOUSING FUNDS Dear Ms. Easter: Housing For Independent People„ Inc. (HIP) has recently entered escrow to purchase the "Vosburg Hotel" (Parcels: 02 055 05, 06, 07, 08 and 09 and 02 056 01). It is our intent to complete purchase on or before Tuesday, February 26, 1991. Founded in 1980 as a 501(c)(3) non-profit development corporation, HIP's sole purpose is the construction, rehabilitation and maintenance of "affordable" housing. HIP currently owns and manages over fifty (50) developments throughout California. It is HIP's desire to rehabilitate and modernize the existing Hotel in a manner which preserves its current design appearance. HIP additionally wishes to develop a new structure immediately north of the existing Vosburg Hotel, It is HIP's intent the design of that new facility reflect the architecture of the existing Hotel. We have retained architect David Marshall: Peoples Housing, Inc. who is well experienced in similar projects. HIP has instructed him to work closely with City staff to insure that our design is created not onby ourselves but with utmost municipal and community imput. It is anticipated that HIP will, in the future, request closure and dedication of Third Street between Pico and San Jacinto Avenues, Final design may require a conditional use permit or zone change. 25 East Hedding Street P.O. Box 90148 San Jose, California 95112= San Jose, California 95109 HIP anticipates that, when completed, the rehabilitation of the existing Vosburg Hotel and new development will: Create new retail space (including revitalization of the restaurant) within the existing building to front on both Romona Blvd. and San Jacinto Avenue. We will, within the planning process, seek input from the Chamber of Comrnerece and, 2) Provide affordable housing to community residents. It is HIP's intent to give first priority to persons who currently reside in San Jacinto, second priority to persons who currently work within the City but do not currently reside within San Jacinto and third priority to others (if any units remain untenanted by person of categories "1" and "2") who qualify under certain income standards. It is HIP's intent to limit occupany to persons of "very low" and "lower" income as defined in accordance with standards established by the California Department of Housing and Community Development. All units will be limited to occupany in conformance with "Proposition L - Low Cost Housing" as adopted by the voters of San Jacinto in November 1978. HIP is prepared to make substantial committments of time and money in order to insure that rehabilitation of the Vosburg Hotel and accompanying new construction take place. We have secured a preliminary funding committment from Wells Fargo Bank. Nonethe- less, HIP believes that in order to provide for financial feasibility, City Redevelopment low/moderate income housing funds are needed. This letter is intended to serve as a formal request for six hundred thousand dollars ($600,000.) from the San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency's existing low/moderate income housing fund reserve. This amount will allow HIP to complete purchase in February 1991 and simultaneously continue completion of architectural plans. HIP anticipates repayment of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.) to the Redevelopment Agency at such time as proceeds of the development allow, following completion of the proposed Vosburg rehabilitation and adjacent new construction. Following your review of this correspondence, HIP requests that we have the opportunity to formally appear before the City's Redevelopment Agency with, we hope, a staff recommendation for support of HIP's request for funds. Receipt of those funds as early as possible will allow for timely purchase of the properties and continuation with our plans to rehabilitate a structure of historical significance while also adding new units and retail space within San Jacinto's downtown community. Neil Stone, our project representative (408-283-2223), will be available to you should you or your staff have any questions regarding this correspondence. We look forward to hearing from you, in the near future, so that we may pursue receipt of San Jacinto Redevelopment low/moderate income housing funds. Sincerely, Al DiLudovico Executive Director �`•:r-IT:W L? -11 ; r F%•1• '✓ k �ti.r ? i `► �"1 � M,lw/ CAA t-16-r-4IAL •r �, �` 4ukirtep} ttii V i .. r:E /1,M,! ::L l Ut h� its j",:.. --- ice_, {w 1. 61- ,Z k 'L, fljel Cx,2UK.TYy Rt. - 1 Lt--,) IT +.. r J L }...1- SAN JACINTO POLICE DEPARTMENT 160 West 6th Street San Jacinto, CA. 92383 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and Council Members via City Manager From: Chief of Police Date: February 14, 1991y Subject: 5 Points Signalization and Main Street Traffic Circulation Update The Council has had the opportunity to view the progress over the past months of updating Main Street water lines. With this reaching completion it allows us the opportunity to turn our attention to the circulation of traffic in the Main Street corridor and surrounding roadways as well as possible signalization of the "5 points" intersection at San Jacinto and Main Streets. At the February 19 meeting, we would like to update the Council as to what has transpired to date on the subject and to solicit input as to future action. There can be no doubt in the minds of members of the Council that we are experiencing growth and that there is a need for constant planning to accommodate this growth. The roadway system in the areas of Main, San Jacinto, Pico, Jordan, Third and 5th Streets must be addressed since traffic flows have shown through recent studies that traffic is increasing in this area. Safety for vehicular traffic as well as bicycle and pedestrian traffic is paramount, yet we have several streets in the vicinity which are too narrow to safely accommodate such traffic. In the way of background, annually for the past decade the city has been working on and off with the merchants and CalTrans to determine what if anything could be done to the Main Street corridor and the upgrading of the "5 points" intersection. Approximately 3 years ago a committee consisting of Downtown Business Association members and city officials was formed to address the issues of (parking - on -street and off-street), traffic directional flows, signalization at San Jacinto and Main Streets and any other issue relevant to the traffic and parking problems being discussed. The committee met several times and exchanged ideas and recommendations. Since the funding for the Main Street portion of the project was FAU funding and angle parking was evident, the Federal Highway Administration provided guidelines to the city for consideration on Federal -Aid routes. Coordination memorandum February 14, 1991 Page 2 with CalTrans was also required since the "5 points" intersection was as State Route and was being considered for signalization. CalTrans advised in order to signalize the intersection, approximately 3 angle parking spaces would have to be removed for safe turning movements. At the request of CalTrans the police department provided a 5 year accident rate history associated with backing movements in the 100 and 200 block of East Main Street for their review. In addition, traffic counts were also provide for the current Average Daily Traffic as well as projections for 10 and 20 years. During this same period the DBA and city were unable to come to an agreement on keeping or removing the angle parking on Main Street. Funding for off-street parking was not available and consensus could not be reached as to how to proceed. At this time there are approximately $105,000 available for the signalization of "5 points" and $186,000 available for resurfacing Main Street from 5 points, easterly, to however far the money will permit. The catch 22 in this project is since we have been inactive for so long the money has now been placed into a central "pot" and the city must now petition the Riverside County Transportation Commission to be placed on the Riverside County Transportation Improvement Programs list. According to Mr. Ray Meyers of CalTrans, it appears the soonest we can get on the list for funding will be in the 1992/1993 fiscal year. At the meeting we would like to bring you up to speed on the project and obtain any input from you on "new steps." Should you have any questions prior to the meeting please contact Brian McNabb, Community Development Director or myself. MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: Ross S. Nammar, City Manager SUBJ: FAU Funding - Main St. DATE: 04-28-89 r This week we have been notified by phone that Cal Trans has been granted the right, by Washington, D.C., to decide whether diagonal parking on Main Street is acceptable. Al Raymond from the Sacramento Office must come down to review the case. He is expected to visit us the week of May 15, 1989 and a return decision should be available the end of June. We will keep you posted on any further progress on this subject. Respectfully submitted, ROSS S. NAMM nr M 1 M r_0 TO: Joe Kozma, Police Chief FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development SUBJ: Designation of Main Street as a One -Way Street I recently attended a meeting with the State's Representatives of the Main Street Program. At this meeting we discussed the possibility of One -Way traffic on Main Street. The State's Representatives indicated that One -Way traffic, in their opinion, would adversely affect the businesses on Main Street because it denied access from one direction. Pat Noyes and Janice Pregliasco were the two representatives. Should you have any questions, please contact me. 174-egall BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM:lr fy of San cqaci,nto City Hall — 201 East Main Street 714 - 654-7337 December 22, 1988 Mr. J.L. Balcom State of California Department of Transportation P.O. Box 231 San Bernardino, Ca. 92402 Post Office Box 488 San Jacinto, California 92383 SUBJ: DIAGONAL PARKING ON EAST MAIN STREET AT HIGHWAY 79 Dear Mr. Balcom: Several months ago, I addressed a letter to your agency regarding some questions the City had concerning the retention of diagonal parking on Main Street. In your September 19, 1988 response you requested more information. Enclosed for your information is the collision diagram for the two blocks of Main Street with diagonal parking. A recent traffic count in the stretch showed a current and daily traffic volume of 5000. Based on traffic studies performed for two projects, the 10 year projection ADT is 10,400, and the 20 year is 17,000. I hope this is all the information you desire. If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM:ga Sheriff Street 1.«:atioq 200 Block Last Pain Street, San Jacinto ..,1112114 ?cried of Sundry: 1-1-84 to 10-30-88 Total Years: Months: 10 Year 1984 1985 1986 1q87 1988 HLi'9ER OF ACCIDPN{Ts Total 1 3 0 ACCIOEHr SIRNAAY Fatal !Injure( Px1 1 2 1 1 Car 2 Gar 2 U6'OLVEr r - 'Multi- Vehicle 1 I iicyCk LIGHT Gay Light 1 1 3 Dark HO. PERSONS Killed Inj TYPE O(rJfl?T Later- Sect App gear End Reaaris Backing Backing Backing/Lust co 2 1 Backing rot 6 1 5 5 6 5 - Backing 1 - Unknown N s .-I 0, N 0 V COLLISION DIAGRAM LIMY! 22106 - Unsafe Starting or Backing Unk - Driver Experienced Medica]. Problems ntrol . - Injury 0 - Non -Injury 1 J.Q 2t ion N CO 100 Block. Eesr Main Street. San Jacinto Period of •Sundry: 1-11-1-8[— -- - —� to 10-30-88 Total Years: 4&nths: 10 Year 198/ 198 1986 1987 1988 h1R4BER OF ACCIDENTS Total 0 2 2 2 5 11 Fatal 'Injury 1 1 1 PDO Car 2 1 9 5 10 Car 2 2 5 10 ACCIDEtT S0NARY INVOLYE}lzlrr LICHT LNu1ti- - Vehicle dicycl_ Red Light 2 2 2 5 11 Dark O. PE Tilled 1nj 0 CO O O 010 1 'p NI N N S TNPi,p0714NT Inter - Sect 1 2 APp Pear End \D4 Reuarks In O N COLLISION DIAGRAM * Intersection collision was associated with stopping for backing traffic in 100 block East Main Street Intersection collision1 was associated with stopping for backing traffic in 100 block East Main Street Le end 22106 - Unsafe Starting or Backing 219S4a- Pedestrian Failing to Yield Outside of Crosswa BackingII - Injury **Backing 8 - Backing O - Non -Injury 2 ssoc w/ Bg 1 - Peeestrian Backing * STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8, P.O. BOX 231 5AN BERNARDINO, CA 92402 TDD (714) 383-4609 (714) 383-4578 September 19, 1988 City of San Jacinto Attention: Brian McNabb P.O. Box 488 San Jacinto, CA 92383 Dear Mr. McNabb: GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Governor Your letter of August 12, 1988, asked several questions about diagonal parking on Main Street. We need the following additional infotmation in order to analyze the situation. 1. The present and future (20 yrs.) average daily traffic (ADT) count. 2. A collision diagram for the last 3 years plus the current year. Safety and capacity are important elements to be considered before a decision can be made. If you have any questions, please call Ernie Rogers at (714) 383- 4578. Very truly yours, j J.L. BALCOM Chief, Local Streets and Roads cc: A. Raymond, DLSR G. Stager, FHWA cCEIV D SEP 21 799 Community Development t an, actinto City Hall — 201 East Main Street 714 - 654-7337 August 12, 1988 Mr. Ernie Rogers Cal Trans P. O. Box 231 San Bernardino, CA 92403 Post Office Box 488 San Jacinto, California 92383 Dear Mr. Rogers: As you know, the City of San Jacinto has FAU funds appropriated for FY 88-89 for improvements on Main Street. Currently, two blocks of Main St. contain diagonal (45 degree) parking with two- way traffic. The general indication we have received from your office is that diagonal parking will have to be eliminated if we wish to use these FAU funds unless it was determined the roadway conditions were safe enough to warrant its retention. Normally, this decision is made at the time of Field Review. The City Council has established a committee made up of City Council Members, Staff, and the business community for the purpose of studying different proposals. After a number of meetings, it has been determined that the committee can go no further without some official input from CAL TRANS. As the City is not prepared to start the field re -view process in the next few months, we are trying to determine the following in advance: 1. Will one-way traffic be permitted on Main Street within the two -block area adjacent to State Highway 79? If so, does CAL TRANS have an official opinion as to which direction the traffic must flow? 2. Given the fact the street is 60curb to curb, will diagonal parking be allowed? If so, under what conditions? Two- way traffic? One way traffic? 3. What restrictions will the future signalization (also an FAU project FY 89-90) place on Main Street. • ,4 August 12, 1988 Mr. Ernie Rogers CAL TRANS Page 2 This information, in the form of an official response, will enable the committee to make a recommendation to the City Council and will expedite our submission of the Field Review application. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, BRIAN MC NABS Director of Community Development BKM:lr SAN JACINTO POLICE DEPARTMENT 160 West 6th Street San Jacinto, California 92383 To: Honorable Mayor and Council Members From: Chief of Police/City Traffic Engineer Date: March 2, 1988 Subject: Proposal to Change Traffic Patterns and Parking on Certain Streets Within the Downtown Business District. With the advent of growth within our city and the surrounding areas, we are faced with decisions which are controversial and difficult in many cases. In the area of traffic we must be futurists and place into motion changes, based on the best possible information available at the time, which will allow traffic within our city to move from point "A" to point "Er with relative ease and reasonable safety. I often find in dealing with study areas someone always suffers for one reason or another due to needed changes and everyone cannot be satisfied. This is a fact of life. You, as the policy makers must transgress the traditional boundaries of small city concerns and develop planning which will deal with the concerns of traffic in San Jacinto today and for many years into the future. Since the city is preparing to refurbish Main Street from State Route 79 to Camino Los Banos, and widen Sheriff Street between Main Street and 3rd Street, considerations should also be made at this time to traffic patterns and parking in this same area. Staff is prepared to present several various traffic patterns and parking recommendations for your consideration. Should you consider any of the proposals viable •for implementation and adoption, staff will proceed with completing the required Resolutions to comply with California Vehicle Code requirements. It is my intent to seek reasonable traffic safety approaches for the downtown business streets yet allow for aesthetic characteristics. This first consideration deals with an immediate problem we are faced with, and that is the safety consideration of angle parking while allowing two-way traffic in the 100 and 200 block of East Main Street. The period January 1904 to September 1988 we have experienced 33 traffic accidents from the intersection of State Route 79 and Main Street, easterly on Main Street to the intersection of Main and Jordan. These are reported accidents and there probable were many more which went unreported as is the case in many instances. Secondly, changes in traffic patterns should be considered in light of the narrowness of several old streets. The decisions will not be easy ones but necessary ones. I have had the opportunity to speak to the Boards of Directors of both the San Jacinto Chamber nf Commerce and the San Jacinto Business Association. Both were h chly receptive to the idea of Honorable Mayor and Council Members March 2, 1988 Page 2 change and both had requested further discussion. Needless to say this very subject has been discussed for many years and still no compromise has emerged. 1 feel Council must take a firm stand and implement what you believe to be the most viable recommendation. GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN. Governor STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSNESS.TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OISTRICI 8, PO. BOX 231 SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA 92407 July 17, 1987 Mr. Ross S. Nammar City Manager City of San Jacinto P.O. Box 488 San JaCintOr CA 92383 08-Riv-O-SJc Attention: Bryan McNab Dear Mr. Nammar: Enclosed is copy of the material on curb parking, that you requested, as per our telephone conversation on July 16, 1987. If you have any questions, please call Ernie Rogers at (714) 383-4578. Very truly yours, J. L. BALCOM 77 Chief, Local Streets and Roads Enc. AteEiVEL UL ?.1 1987 r",ommunity Development F-Jf i-HVV/} 121 (.6/7a) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION UNITEJ) St ATES GOVERNMENT Federal -Aid Routes memorandum Angle Parking on • SubiPor. From: .-09 To7 Regional Administrator San Francisco, California Division Apinistrators (Arizona,liCalifornia, Hawaii, Nevada) gnaw: March 13, 1980 Rept,/ -to Attn. of: HED-09 Enclosed are two memorandums from the Director, Office of Traffic Operations on the subject of angle parking on Federal -Aid routes. The first, dated January 22, 1980, transmits a paper, "Angle Parking on Federal -Aid ROUtes,-" and informs that Washington Office response to inquiries regarding angle parking on Federal -Aid routes will be guided by the factors discussed in the paper and its conclusions. We find this position consistent with angle parking policy given in FHPM 6-8-2-2 (23 CFR 655), and recommend use of the paper as guidance when considering appropriate use of angle parking on Federal -Aid routes. The second memorandum, dated February 14, 1980, transmits a revised page 3 for the paper and provides discussion of reasons for the revision. The original page 3 has been replaced by the revised page in the copy of the paper enclosed for your convenience. 1-cE.TD p,p, 1719-0 Enclosures ---7 Neil Dillaboughy ector )rT Li Office of Envi merit and Design I 1 Tun l{A 171 (Rsv. 5-73) UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum SUBJECT Angle Parking on Federal -Aid Routes FROM Director Office of Traffic Operations Washington, D.C. 20590 To . Regional Federal Highway Administrators Regions 1-10 ERA-09 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION • DATE This memorandum transmits the attached paper, "Angle Parking on Federal -Aid Routes." The paper concludes: "Angle parking is an allowable form of street parking. The type of street parking selected for use on Federal - aid routes should depend on the specific function and width of the street, the adjacent land use, and traffic volume, as well as existing and anticipated traffic operations." This position is consistent with FHWA policy stated in HUM 6-8-2-2 (23 CFR 655), Traffic Operations Improvement Programs (TOPICS). Our response to public, legislative, and executive inquiries will be guided by the factors discussed in the paper and its conclusions. The distribution and promotion of this paper is left to your discretion. • The Implementation Division of the Office of Development is proceeding with a project to produce a guide for street parking. While the guide will better define the relationships between the corridor environment and the use of street space, we do not anticipate any change in the conclusions stated above. arshall Jackf, Jr. Attachment Attachment Angle Parking on Federal -Aid Routes 1. BACKGROUND. The current FHWA position on angle parking is found in paragraph 5.b. (2) of FHPM 6-8-2-2, Operations Improvement- Programs (TOPICS). "°(2) Angle (diagonal) parking is allowable on Federal -aid projects if in the judgment of the Division Administrator there will not be adverse effects on street capacity and safety." Past Federal -aid policy prohibiting the retention of angle parking was formulated when routes on the Federal - aid Systems in the urban areas included only major streets (arterials) and expressways which carried large daily traffic volumes. Today, many important Urban System eith streets have a primary function of local service, service to through traffic a secondary concern_ Thus, Federal -aid funds are now available for construction projects on streets and highways which may only provide internal circulation and direct service to neighborhood traffic generators. In recent years, approval of angle parking was instrumental in implementing several controversial projects that have improved traffic operations and safety. The current FHWA angle parking policy is based on the satisfactory performance of these installations and the preliminary results of research titled "Safety Aspects of Curb Parking."' The final research report, which has been distributed, supports the initial conclusions and current policy. On some portions of Federal -aid routes, it may be acceptable to retain or implement angle parking where conditions are appropriate. 2 GUIDANCE_ As with other types of parking, angle parking has advantages and disadvantages. The following items should provide some guidance when considering the use of angle parking. a. Parking/Accident Relationships (1) Urban parking related accidents, generally are not serious in terms of injury or 1J. B. Humphreys, P. C. Box, T. D. Sullivan, D. J. Wheeler. Final Report - Safety Aspects of Curb Parking. FHWA-RD-79-75F,76, September 1978. (2) property damage. For example, the National Safety Council accident tabulation for - 1978 (urban traffic accidents not involving pedestrians 1975-77) reported that there were approximately 374 fatal accidents involving parking and 1,665,000 total accidents involving parking, a rate of 1 fatality per 4,600 accidents. The ratio of nonpedestrian fatal urban accidents to total urban accidents during 1977 was 10,400 to12,610,00, or 1 to 820; over five times larger. The researchers of an FHWA sponsored research study of on -street parking] reached the following conclusion. "No widely accepted relationships have been established among parking configurations (diagonal, flat angle, parallel, etc.), parking density, traffic flow, pedestrian activity, and highway safety." b. Advantages offered by angle parking (1) Angie parking reportedly can reduce accidents involving pedestrians darting from the curb into the street because pedestrian and motorists' fields of view are improved, pedestrians act more cautiously, and vehicle speeds tend to decrease.2 The overlap of vehicles parked at angles equal to or greater than 30 degrees acts as a physical barrier to pedestrians and prevents direct access to street traffic. (These comments should not be interpreted in any manner to condone jaywalking, for over 20 percent of all urban fatal accidents are pedestrian/vehicle accidents, which occurred between intersections). People entering or exiting parked vehicles are not exposed directly to street traffic. The combined parking and unparking maneuver time is shorter than for any other parking type except pull -through. 2W. G. Berger. Urban Pedestrian Accident Countermeasures Experimental Evaluation. Volume I: Behavior Evaluation Studies Prepared by BioTechnology, Inc., for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and FHWA, February 1975. 3 (4) More parking spaces are provided than with other forms. Assuming one side of a typical block of an urban CBD street, the folloing.number of parking spaces are typical: 13 for parallel or 22-1/2°angle; 16 at 30°.; 23 at 45°; 28 at 60'; and 32 at 90°. Thus, the higherangle layts increase parking capacity by 60 to 140 percent. (5) Drivers have less difficulty angle parking than parallel parking. c. Disadvantages of angle parking Angle parking requires more street width than parallel, therefore, less street will be available for traffic lanes. This narrowing coupled with the increased parking activity allowed by angle parking usually results in reduced traffic operating speed_ This reduction can be stated as delay and will, in cases of high volume demand, adversely affect the throughput of the street_ The combined width needed for parking lane and an adajacent maneuver lane increases as the parking angle increases. Typical values are: 22 feet for parallel; 26 feet for 22-1/2°; 28 feet for 30°; 30 feet for 45°; 34 feet for 60°; and 43 feet for 90°. (3) Vehicles leaving an angle parking space may have a restricted view of oncoming traffic. This sight restriction is dependent on the angle (lower angles result in less restriction) and the type of vehicle parked on the upstream side of the unparking vehicle. d. Operating Characteristics There are many sources of congestion relative to utilization of street space which can be detrimental to both local and thlough traffic. Examples include: double parking by shoppers, taxis, and service or delivery vehicles; parking violations in bus turnouts and traffic lanes; pedestrian conflicts; and lack of signal coordination. Parking is but one of many site specific design elements which is subject to compromise in arriving at a project which will satisfy local, State, and national goals. (1) (2) 4 Slower operating speeds and higher levels of vehicle activity are often interpreted as traffic congestion. The business community considers this subject quite differently and they often equate more -parking spaces, and increased parking turnover with more customers and an improved business environment. The increased vehicle activity resulting from angle parking can result in more noise and a reduction in air quality, however, the accompanying slower speed can result in noise reduction and improve safety for motorists and pedestrians. S. CONCLUSIONS. Angle parking is an allowable form of street parking. The type of street parking selected for use on Federal -aid projects should depend on the specific function and width of .the street, the adjacent land use and traffic volumes, as well as existing and anticipated traffic operations. c. x (4) More parking spaces are provided than with other forms. Assuming one side of a • typical block of an urban CBD street, the following number of parking spaces are: typical: 13 for parallel or 22-1/2°angle; 16 at 30°; 23 at 45°; 28 at 60°; and 32 at 90°. Thus, the higher angle layouts j increase parking capacity by 60 to 40 percent. Drivers have less difficulty . gle parking than parallel parking. Disadvantages of angle parkin An le parking require more street width than .parllel, therefore, ess street will be available for traff' lanes. This narrowing cdilpl d with the increased parking activity allowed by angle ►arking usually results in reduce traffic 6perating speed_ This reduction can b- stated as delay and will, in cases of h':h volume demand, adversely affect the t oughput of the street. (1) (2) (3) The combin=d;width needed for parking lane and an ad Jac t maneuver lane increases as the park g an:le increases,. Typical values are: 22 feet fo'y parallel; 26 feet for 22-1/2°, 28 feet \for 30°; 30 feet for 45°; and 31 feet for 60 through 90 . Vehi+les leaving an angle parking space may hav< a restricted view of oncoming traffic. This sight restriction\is dependent on the angle (lower angles result in less restriction) end the type of vehicle parked on the upstream jj side of the unpacking vehicle. d. Operating Characteristics there are many sou.ces of congestion relative to utilization of street space which can be detrimental l: to both local and through traffic. Examples double parking by shoppers, taxis, and service or delivery vehicles; parking violations in bus turnouts and traffic lanes; pedestrian conflicts; and lack of signal coordination. Parking is but one of many site specific design elements which is subject to compromise in arriving at a project which will satisfy local, State, and national goals. �rl'r;;�,' l UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT emorandum SUSIECT , Angle Parking on Federal -Aid Routes (Paper Attached to out January 22, 1980 Memorandum) From Director Office of Traffic Operations Washington, D.C. 20590 To Regional Federal Highway Administrators Region 1-10 V LI Tneeu V••- -- .... - FE6EVM. f. VAS ABu1MISTRAnoN rr1 OATS 1 i_U 1 I In np7 HT0-34 Paragraph 2c(2) on page 3 states "The combined width needed for parking lane and an adjacent maneuver lane increases as the parking angle increases. Typical values are: 22 feet for parallel; 26 feet for 22 1/2°; 28 feet for 30°; 30 feet for 45°; and 31 feet for 60' through 90°." Region 5 questioned the adequacy of 31 feet for 60° through 90° parking angles. Mr. J. B. Humphreys, co-author of "Safety Aspects of Curb Parking", FHWA-RD-79-16 has subsequently verified these values. It should be kept in mind that the observed field study sites with 90° parking were limited in number and were all local streets. We have concluded that the combined width needed for a parking lane and the adjacent maneuver lane should be 34 feet for 60° and 43 feet for 90°. Page 3 of the subject paper has been revised accordingly and is attached for your use and distribution. The parking lane width for 60° and 90° parking are essentially the same. The required maneuver lane width however, is significantly different. The 15 foot wide lane required for 60' parking allows a comfortable offset between traffic and parked vehicles and a nor- mal width travel lane. The 24 feet required for the maneuver lane for 90° parking is excessively wide and may tempt many drivers to use this space as two traffic lanes, therefore sharply increasing the potential of vehicle conflicts. While there will be few practical applications of 90' angle parking, some do exist. Two examples are: (1) A 60 foot wide residential street can be operated with a one way 24 foot wide, driving lane and 90° angle parking on both sides. This layout will provide nearly 50 percent more parking than would a two way street of the same width with 45' angle parking on each side (64 and 46 spaces respectively); and (2) A 44 foot one way street with 90' angle parking on one side will provide percent more parking spaces than a two way street with parall rking on both sides. Marshall Jacks, Jr. CONCLUSIONS The research was intended to examine relationships "among parking configurations (angle, parallel or no parking), parking density, traffic flow, street width, pedestrian activity and highway safety. The literature review identified 27 studies of accidents as related to curb parking. The use of angle parking was identified in many studies as significantly more hazardous than parallel. (However, the use of angle parking has been endorsed by some researchers as offering potentials for safer pedestrian behavior when crossing between parked vehicles, while one agency has reported 22° parking to be safer than parallel. Assuming one side of a typical block of an urban CBD, the following numbers of parking spaces are typical: 13 for parallel or at 22Y; 17 at 30°; or 21 at 45°. Thus, the higher angle layout increases parking capacity by about 607„ With respect to parking configurations, the variables found in this research to be associated with accident rates include: a) functional classification of street; b) utili- zation of parking spaces; and c) abutting land use. Increased parking utilization; i.e., annual space hours per mile, results in significantly higher accident rates, up to approximately 1.5 million. Streets abutting land uses which generate high parking'turnovers and pedestrian activity (land use has been used as a surrogate for pedestrian volums) have higher accident rates when Compared with lower intensity uses. Thus, --a givn utilization of.parking along a retail than if the sameTrL Utilization 'Were found en a Street abutted by single-family residential. Heavily used parallel parking was found to have accident rates comparable to heavily used high angle parking having approximately double,tthe parking utilization. How- ever, angle parking results in poorer operating conditions and allows higher utilization per curb mile than does par- allel parking. 116 /The prohibition of curb parking provides the safest condition. Minimizing the use of any curb parking (whatever the layout), such as by providing adequate, convenient off- street parking, will give the next safest operation. The research data shows that prohibition of curb park- ing along major streets could reduce midblock accidents by an average of 19% with an existing parking utilization of one-half million annual space hours per mile. For a one million parking utilization level, the prohibition could re- duce midblock accidents by 737. If intersection accidents are included in the rate calculation per million vehicle miles, the overall reduction is then equivalent to 8% and 29%, respectively. No categorical differences among parking layouts could be substantiated by the statistical analysis when street function, land use and utilization level were all comparable. - In this research, the proportion of parking accidents to total accidents within the study areas was 20%, which agrees with other research. Only 2 of intersection acci- dents were found to be parked -related. Of all property damage -only type accidents, 24% were parking -involved. Of all injury/fatal accidents,- 7% were found to be parking - involved. Curb parking can therefore be seen as a pro- nounced factor in traffic safety. Considering functional classifications, the midblock accidents that were parking -related accounted for 49% of the collisions along major streets, 68% along collector streets, and 72% along local streets. These data reflect averages, -:including study sections with' -parking' restrictions (nearly..° -_ =-onerth _�_e_of the_::a►a�o= sti eZ sc ;nff- rk'rtg`" tx' c3ns7: -Thus, som=sections o nafor=str�ecs a� �x er g + g er centages of accideritsJrelated to curb parking. On 1-way major streets, 60% of midblock accidents were found to be parking-related!'compared with 43 for 2-way streets. The largest difference appeared to result from the unparking maneuver; however, no one accident type clearly stood out as the basic cause of the higher 1-way street proportion. 117 A` summary tabulation of midblock accident percentages by type of parking involvement and street classification is given in Table 50. Table 50. Per Cent of Midblock Accidents by Type of Parking Involvement Street Classification Accident Category" Major Collector Local Combined Open Door Veh.-Pk.Car 3 0 1 2 Parking Maneuver Veh.-Pk.Car 6 5 2 5 Sight Restriction Veh.-P/B 0 0 2 1 Stationary Parked Veh. Veh.-Pk.Car 23 50 59 31 Veh.-P/B 0 0 1 0 Unparking Maneuver Veh.-Pk.Car 16 13 6 14 TOTAL PARKING RELATED 48- 68 71 53 ^"Veh.-Pk.Car = moving vehicle striking parking -involved vehicle (if 1% or more). Veh.-P/B = vehicle striking pedestrian or bicycle rider (if 17. or more). The parking accident involvements, as a percent of _.total midblock accidents;_ may.be.:ranked-as fo11,ows:_ ti_... 2. Unparking maneuver 14% 3. Parking maneuver _ So/ 4. Door opening " 2% 0 5. Sight obstruction for pedestrians. 1% Decisions regarding the effect of parking should con- sider the relative magnitudes of accident potential. 118 A correlation between street width and accident rates was not found for any of the three types of streets. Field studies meansured speeds and delays to through vehicles as well as parking/unparking times and conflicts. Vehicles engaged in parking maneuvers caused more conflicts when parking parallel, while the unparking maneuver created more conflicts with the angle layouts, as found in other studies. Speeds of through vehicles averaged 3.7 MPH (6.0 KPH) less when adjacent to angle parking, as compared with parallel. A before -and -after study, conducted on High Street in Portsmouth, Virginia, allowed direct measurement of the effects produced by a change from parallel to angle parking. Two blocks of a 59 foot (18 m) street with four through lanes and parallel parking on both sides were converted to carry two through lanes plus 45° angle parking on both sides. Through traffic speeds dropped from 24.5 MPH (39 KPU) to 15.6 MPH (25 KPH), or 367. The percentage of delayed vehicles in- creased from 5 to 30, while the average delay more than doubled (4.8 seconds to 9.8 seconds). Parking times were decreased substantially, while unparking times (both total and time in the traffic stream) were,slightly increased. • Over 2,900 parking activities were observed. Few mid - block pedestrian conflicts with curb parking were found, amounting to only 0.25% of the parking activity. The park- ing/unparking vehicle conflicts with through traffic occurred about 7 times as frequently as the vehicle -pedestrian con- flict. • the flatter 22½° or 30° angles. FurtheLmore, field studies indicated that the 221/2° layout would probably modify pedes- trian actions by a lesser amount than would the 30° or 45° angles. The combined -width needed for an adjacent lane plus parking lane was determined to be: Parallel; 22 feet (6.6 m) 119 222 angle; 26 feet (7.8 m) 45° angle; 30 feet (9.0 m) 60° and over; 31 feet (9.3 m) The curb parking attitudes and policies of public agencies, as identified in the literature search, may be summarized as follows: 1. Recognition that high hazard is associated with curb parking in general. 2. Belief that angle parking is especially hazardous. 3. Concern for the congestion affect of curb parking. 4. The taking of positive steps. to reduce future curb parking demand, by constructing new off- street facilities, and by enactment and en- forcement of zoning controls requiring off- street parking supply for new developments. 5. The extensive use of rush hour and of total parking prohibitions. 6. The refusal to allow new angle parking installations. 7. The elimination of existing angle parking or conversion to parallel type. This study supports some of the literature findings in _that curb parkingy- where showed and _utilized does _p oduce cra_---z #=t, support' items 2; 6--au • 7 above-, be-cai e- parking' configu a-- tion was not found to -be a significant factor in accident rate variation, when parking utilization, land use and street type are considered. In summary, this study indicates that allowance of any type of on -street parking in areas of high demand and activ- ity (such as with retail land use) will result in signifi- 120 cantly highei I.azard than if parking is prohi =ed• The magnitude of the hazard decreases, however, as parking activity lessens. Thus, streets abutted by apartment or single-family residential land use have successively lower hazard with a given parking utilization. The study results support previous findings on higher delay, lower operating speed and reduced effective street width for movement of traffic, when relating angle parking with parallel. Future Research The findings on parking utilization suggest that future studies of accidents related to parking configuration should include measurement of utilization. Moreover, studies of the effect of a change of parking in one block should include similar studies simultaneously made for nearby blocks. If a parking prohibition, or a reduction of spaces caused by change from angle to parallel, results in a higher utiliza- tion in adjacent blocks, accidents on such streets might in- crease. Thus, the overall impact of a change should be assessed and not just limited to the specific study site. 121