Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 6/3/2004AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL JUNE 3, 2004, 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Invocation — Rev. Bob Sauter, Faith Tabernacle, San Jacinto 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance 1.5 Special Presentations 1.5.1 Proclamation / Anna Martin — Cancer Research Fundraiser 1.5.2 Presentation by David Willmon — League of California Cities Representative 1.5.3 Presentation by Washington Representative Joni Goodman 1.5.4 Business Spotlight of the Month / Economic Development Specialist 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Now is the time for the public to address the Council on any subject within the jurisdiction of the City Council not listed on the agenda. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the City Council. 3. PUBLIC HEARING 3.1 Resolution No. / A Resolution approving future annexation of territory into Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (CFD 2003-1) / Continued from May 20, 2004 / Approve / Special Tax Consultant and City Attorney 4. CITY DEPARTMENTS City Council Agenda June 3, 2004 Page 2 of 4 4.1 Council Goals Process / City Manager 4.2 Budget Hearing Fiscal Year 2004-2005 / Review and direct staff for final adoption June 17, 2004 / Finance Director and City Manager 5. CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by City Council Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Mayor; state their name and address, and the consent calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. 5.1.1 Warrant Register for Warrants, Prepaid Checks, and Payroll Checks Period Ending 06/03/04 / Approve / Finance Director 5.1.2 Treasurer's Report at April 30, 2004 / Approve / Finance Director 5.1.3 Ordinance 04-13 /An Ordinance of the City Council acting as the Legislative body of Community Facilities District No. 2 authorizing the levy of a special tax within Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2 / Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance 04-13 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, acting as the Legislative Body of Community Facilities District No. 2 authorizing the levy of a special tax within community Facilities District No. 2 / Finance Director 5.1.4 Main Street, Soboba Road, Esplanade Avenue, and Artesia Street Pavement Rehabilitation / Award Public Works Contract to Matich Corporation of San Bernardino for the sum of $1,076,076 plus 15% contingency, Authorize City Clerk to reject all other bids received and Authorize Mayor to Execute the contract / City Engineer Public Works Bid Award 5.1.5 Spending Plan for the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) Grant (FY2003) / Approve / Chief of Police 5.1.6 Traffic Report at Intersection of Ramona Expressway and Eagle Drive / Adopt traffic report dated May 3, 2004 / Authorize implementation of recommendations as presented in the report / City Engineer City Council Agenda June 3, 2004 Page 3 of 4 5.1.7 Solid Waste Rate Increase / Approve tipping fee pass thru rate increase requested by CR&R Disposal / City Manager 5.1.8 Sale of City's Police vehicles to Riverside County Sheriffs Department / Approve sale of vehicles for the amount of $275,000 / City Manager 5.1.9 Eastern Municipal Water District Sewer Negotiations / Support City's negotiating position for expanding the City's sewer collection line maintenance function to include the newly developing areas of the City / City Manager 5.1.10 Conditional Use Permit 1-04 / Wireless Communications Facility / Ratify the approval of Planning Commission's Conditional Use Permit 1-04 based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval, allowing the construction of two 45-foot high fully stealthed mono -palms to be located at the northeast corner of a 2.65 acre commercial parcel at 1283 Ramona Expressway 5.1.11 Conditional Use Permit 12-03 / Construction of a 527 unit mini - storage facility / Ratify the approval of Conditional Use Permit 12- 03 based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval, allowing the construction of a 527 unit mini storage facility on a 75,000 square foot parcel, located within a multi -tenant mixed use commercial/industrial complex at the southwest corner of Esplanade Avenue and Santa Fe Avenue 6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS None 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representative: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Police Officers Association 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR Agency designated representative: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Sergeants Association 7.3 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representative: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Management Association City Council Agenda June 3, 2004 Page 4 of 4 7.4 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL —ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9: (One case) 8. ADJOURNMENT If you challenge any action of the City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council (c/o the City Clerk) at, or prior to, the public hearing. CHALLENGE TO LAND USE DECISIONS: Any person seeking to challenge a decision regarding land use made by the City Council as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and the discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the City Council, shall be required to commence that action 90 days following the date on which the decision of the City Council becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Please refer to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes final. It is the intention of the City of San Jacinto to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. lf, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact City Hall at (909) 487-7330, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. �. Veme q 4.exoaemva, e4 Anis 4 rite eetry sax /factnra, do 4,e4 Century rlar 9 cancel to ee pared rise dmregaing agenda rlaa 2Sa dart' 4 . 2004 as aegaezed 4 Faw. NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO TO COMMEMORATE CONTRACT WITH THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Special Meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto will be held on May 31, 2004, at 7:00 p.m. at 2479 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California for the purpose of commemorating the contract with Riverside County Sheriff's Department for law enforcement services in the City of San Jacinto. AGENDA ITEM 3 e l June 3, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Special Tax Consultant and City Attorney SUBJECT: Future Annexation of Territory into Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 for Police and Fire Services RECOMMENDATION: By motion approve and adopt Resolution No. / A Resolution approving future annexation of territory into Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (CFD 2003-1). BACKGROUND: The City Council and Planning Commission have recently identified the need for additional funding sources for police protection and fire protection and suppression services, especially those services that are created by new development within the City. In response to the need for additional funding for such services, the City Council formed Community Facilities District 2003-1 (the "District') and the levy of special taxes therein. On November 6, 2003, the City Council called an election of the landowners affected by the formation of the District and the levy of special taxes. The landowners approved the formation of the District and levy of special taxes with over a two-thirds majority vote of the voters voting. Future development of real property near the boundaries of the District. As a condition to receiving the building permits from the City, such future developers must annex its territory into the District. JUSTIFICATION: The adoption of the resolution will streamline and expedite the annexation process into the District by shortening the timeline for certain actions by the City Council. Approval City Manager: Finance Director: BUDGETARY IMPACT: The future annexation of territory into the District will have a beneficial impact to the City's budget in that, upon implementation of the proposed financing district, it would assist in the funding of police and fire services that would otherwise come from the City's general fund. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No Page 2of2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY IN THE FUTURE TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City Of San Jacinto (the "City Council"), has declared its intention, conducted proceedings and held a public hearing relating to the authorization to annex territory in the future to Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 (the "District") pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the "Act"), being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof; and WHEREAS, notice of such public hearing was given in the form and manner as required by the Act; and, WHEREAS, all communications relating to the authorization to annex territory in the future were presented at such public hearing, and it has further been determined that a majority protest as defined by Government Code Section 53339.6 has not been received against the proposed annexation in the future to the District; and, WHEREAS, it has now been determined to be within the best public interest and convenience to establish a procedure to allow and provide for future annexations to the District and further to specify the amount of special taxes that would be levied in any future annexation area, as well as setting forth the terms and conditions for certification of any annexation in the future; and, WHEREAS, the area proposed to be annexed in the future shall be known and designated as Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 (Future Annexation Area) (the "Future Annexation Area"), and a map showing the territory of the area proposed to be annexed in the future has been submitted, which said map has been previously approved by this City Council and a copy of said map shall be kept on file with the transcript of these proceedings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED determined and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Determinations. It is hereby determined by this City Council as fol lows: Page 1 of 6 A. All prior proceedings pertaining to the annexation of the Future Annexation Area to the District in the future were valid and taken in conformity with the requirements of the law, and specifically the provisions of the Act, and that this finding and determination is made pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 53325.1. B. The written protests against the annexation of the Future Annexation Area to the District received do not represent a majority protest as defined by the Government Code Section 53339.6 and, therefore, the annexation of the Future Annexation Area to the District in the future has not been precluded by majority protest pursuant to Government Code Section 53339.6. C. The public convenience and necessity require a procedure to authorize and provide for territory to be annexed in the future to the District in order to finance the costs and expenses necessary to provide the public services and public facilities described below. D. The annexation of the Future Annexation Area to the District in the future as proposed conforms with the City of San Jacinto statement of goals and policies regarding the establishment of community facilities districts. E. The provision for the annexation of the Future Annexation Area to the District in the future and the authorization to levy special taxes within the Future Annexation Area upon the annexation thereof to the District to finance the public services and the public facilities described below does not constitute a commitment to finance any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. Such annexation and such authorization to levy special taxes constitutes the creation of a government funding mechanism which does not involve the commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. Therefore, the provision for the annexation of the Future Annexation Area to the District in the future and the authorization to levy special taxes within the Future Annexation Area upon the annexation thereof to the District does not constitute a "project" Page 2of6 SECTION 3. SECTION 4. SECTION 5. SECTION 6. which is subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code Section 21000 and following). Annexation Authority. This legislative body does hereby authorize for the annexation of territory in the future pursuant to the provisions and authorization of Article 3.5 of the Act. Description of the Future Annexation Area. A description of the Future Annexation Area is attached in the boundary map set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. Description of Services and Facilities. The types of public services to be financed from the levy of special taxes in the District, including the Future Annexation Area, are those described as follows: (a) additional police protection services, including but not limited to, criminal justice services and (b) additional fire protection and suppression services. The public services and public facilities shall to the maximum extent practicable, taking into account budgetary and operational demands of the City of San Jacinto, be provided in common within the District and the Future Annexation Area. Special Taxes. It is the intention of this legislative body that, except where funds are otherwise available, a special tax sufficient to pay for such services to be provided in the Future Annexation Area, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the Future Annexation Area, will be levied annually within the boundaries of the Future Annexation Area. The special taxes shall be those as originally authorized through the formation of the District and adopted by ordinance of this legislative body, and no changes or modifications are proposed in the special taxes from those as originally set forth and made applicable to the District. For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit "B", Page 3 of 6 SECTION 7. which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment to allow each landowner or resident within the Future Annexation Area to clearly estimate the maximum annual amount that said person will have to pay on said special tax. The proposed special taxes shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency as applicable for ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable, this legislative body may establish and adopt an altemate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the District. Special Tax Accountability Measures. Pursuant to and in compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50075.1, this City Council hereby establishes the following accountability measures pertaining to the levy by the District of the special taxes described in Section 7 above: A. Each such special tax shall be levied for the specific purposes set forth in Section 7 above. B. The proceeds of the levy of each such special tax shall be applied only to the specific applicable purposes set forth in Section 7 above. C. The District shall establish a separate account into which the proceeds of each such special tax shall be deposited. D. The City Manager or his or her designee, acting for and on behalf of the District, shall annually file a report with the City Council as required pursuant to Government Code Section 50075.3. Page 4of6 SECTION 8. SECTION 9. Annexation Effective Date. Annexation of territory in the Future Annexation Area to the District in the future shall be effective only upon the unanimous approval of the owner or owners of each parcel or parcels to the annexation of such parcel or parcels and the election by such owner or owners to subject such parcel or parcels to the levy of the special tax at the time that any parcel is proposed for annexation. Upon receipt of the written consent and the election by such owner or owners, no further public hearings will be required to effectuate the annexation of such parcel or parcels to the District. Annexation Required as Condition of Approval of Land Use Entitlements. Annexation of territory within the Future Annexation Area shall be a condition precedent to the approval by or the consent of the City of San Jacinto of any discretionary land use entitlement for the use or development of territory within the Future Annexation Area. The Fire Chief is hereby directed to take any and all action necessary to implement this requirement. Page 5 of 6 APPROVED and ADOPTED this 3`d day of June, 2004 by the following vote: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Abstain: ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney Best Best & Kreiger, LLP CITY OF SAN JACINTO By: Jim Ayres, Mayor Page 6 of 6 SHEET 1 OF 1 FUTURE ANNEXATION AREA OF CITY OF SAN JACINTO The boundary of the Future Annexation Area to Community COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 Facilities District No. 2003-1 is COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE co-terminous with the boundary of STATE OF CALIFORNIA the City of San Jacinto in 2004. Reference is hereby made to that certain map entitled "Amended Boundaries of City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1, County of Riverside, State of California," filed the 22nd day of December, 2003, at the hour of 8 o'clock a.m. in Book 55 at pages 58-59, and as instrument number 2003-995886 in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, State of California, which this Annexation Map affects. Reference is hereby made to the Assessor maps of the County of Riverside for an exact description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel. IOC. moil ��Boundaries of the Future Annexation Area to City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 JACINTO ' ice .xe �� gIE " p iIfi7i/�iPA^'i. OIL 71NI kikil Prepared by David Toussig & Associates, Inc. (1) Filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto this` day of Apri i , 2004. (2) Exempt recording reques ed per CA Government Code § 6103 Ckotti na td Dorothy Ofiouinard, San Jacinto City Clerk I hereby certify that the within map showing the boundaries of the Future Annexation Area to City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1, Riverside County, State of California, was approved by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on this 15131- day of Pcp-t 2004, by its Resolution No. z538 Dorothy Chodeinard, San Jacinto City Clerk (3) Filed this Q i3 day of PAW RS.L , 2004, at the hour of el o'clock L_m, in Book .S6 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at page Li8" and as Instrument No. �qpy- pJe Is-4 in the office of the County Recorder of Riverside County, State of California. Fee 7° County Recorder of Riverside County EXHIBIT B RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO A Special Tax as hereinafter defined shall be levied on all Assessor's Parcels in Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 of the City of San Jacinto ("CFD No. 2003-1") and collected each Fiscal Year commencing in Fiscal Year 2003-2004, in an amount determined by the Council through the application of the appropriate Special Tax for "Developed Property" as described below. All of the real property in CFD No. 2003-1, unless exempted by law or by the provisions hereof, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent and in the manner herein provided. A. DEFINITIONS The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings: "Acre or Acreage" means the land area of an Assessor's Parcel as shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable final map, parcel map, condominium plan, or other recorded County parcel map. "Act" means the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. "Administrative Expenses" means the following actual or reasonably estimated costs directly related to the administration of CFD No. 2003-1: the costs of computing the Special Taxes and preparing the annual Special Tax collection schedules (whether by the City or designee thereof or both); the costs of collecting the Special Taxes (whether by the County or otherwise); the costs to the City, CFD No. 2003-1 or any designee thereof of complying with City or CFD No. 2003-1 disclosure requirements; the costs associated with responding to public inquiries regarding the Special Taxes; the costs of the City, CFD No. 2003-1 or any designee thereof related to an appeal of the Special Tax; and the City's annual administration fees and third party expenses. Administrative Expenses shall also include amounts estimated or advanced by the City or CFD No. 2003-1 for any other administrative purposes of CFD No. 2003-1, including attorney's fees and other costs related to commencing and pursuing to completion any foreclosure of delinquent Special Taxes. "Apartment Property" means any Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property that consists of a building or buildings comprised of attached residential units available for rental, but not purchase, by the general public and under common management. "Assessor's Parcel Map" means an official map of the Assessor of the County designating parcels by Assessor's Parcel number. City of San Jacinto October 30, 2003 Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 Page 1 "CFD Administrator" means an official of the City, or designee thereof, responsible for calculating the Special Tax Requirement and providing for the levy and collection of the Special Taxes. "CFD No. 2003-1" means Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 of the City. "City" means the City of San Jacinto. "Consumer Price Index" means the Consumer Price Index published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics for "All Urban Consumers" in the Los Angeles - Anaheim - Riverside Area, measured as of the month of December in the calendar year which ends in the previous Fiscal Year. In the event this index ceases to be published, the Consumer Price Index shall be another index as determined by the CFD Administrator that is reasonably comparable to the Consumer Price Index for the City of Los Angeles. "Council" means the City Council of the City, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 2003-1. "County" means the County of Riverside. "Developed Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property for which a building permit for new construction was issued after March 1, 2003 and as of March 1 of the previous Fiscal Year. "Fiscal Year" means the period starting July 1 and ending on the following June 30. "Floor Area" for any Non -Residential Property means the total square footage of the building(s) located on such property, measured from outside wall to outside wall, exclusive of overhangs, porches, patios, carports, or similar spaces attached to the building but generally open on at least two sides. The determination of Floor Area shall be made by reference to the building permit(s) issued for such Assessor's Parcel. "Land Use Class" means any of the classes listed in Table 1 and Table 2. "Maximum Special Tax" means the Maximum Special Tax A and/or Maximum Special Tax B, as applicable. "Maximum Special Tax A" means the Maximum Special Tax A, determined in accordance with Section C.1 below, that can be levied in any Fiscal Year on any Assessor's Parcel. "Maximum Special Tax B" means the Maximum Special Tax B, determined in accordance with Section C.2 below, that can be levied on any Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property on a one-time basis, at the time a building permit for new construction is issued for such Assessor's Parcel. "Non -Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels for which a building permit(s) was issued for a non-residential use. City of San Jacinto October 30, 2003 Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 Page 2 "Non -Retail Commercial/Industrial Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property that are considered Non -Residential Property and that are not Retail Commercial Property. "Property Owner Association Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, any Assessor's Parcel within the boundaries of CFD No. 2003-1 that was owned by or irrevocably offered for dedication to a property owner association, including any master or sub -association, as of January 1 of the previous Fiscal Year. "Proportionately" means that the ratio of the actual Special Tax A levy to the Maximum Special Tax A is equal for all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property. "Public Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, (i) any property within the boundaries of CFD No. 2003-1 that was owned by or irrevocably offered for dedication to the federal government, the State, the City or any other public agency as of January 1 of the previous Fiscal Year; provided however that any property leased by a public agency to a private entity and subject to taxation under Section 53340.1 of the Act shall be taxed and classified in accordance with its use; or (ii) any property within the boundaries of CFD No. 2003-1 that was encumbered, as of January 1 of the previous Fiscal Year, by an unmanned utility easement making impractical its utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the easement. "Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit has been issued for purposes of constructing one or more residential dwelling units. "Retail Commercial Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Non -Residential Property for which the building permit was issued for a retail sales tax generating use or which is being used primarily for a retail sales tax generating use, as determined by the CFD Administrator. However, if the land use of an Assessor's Parcel changes, and such Assessor's Parcel no longer generates retail sales tax, such Assessor's Parcel shall no longer be considered Retail Commercial Property and shall be classified and taxed according to its use, as determined by the CFD Administrator. "Single Family Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Residential Property for which building permits have been issued for detached residential units, excluding Apartment Property. "Special Tax" means the Special Tax A and/or Special Tax B, as applicable. "Special Tax A" means the annual special tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property to fund the Special Tax Requirement. "Special Tax B" means the one-time Special Tax which is paid directly to the City at the time a building permit for new construction is issued for an Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property. City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 October 30, 2003 Page 3 "Special Tax Requirement" means that amount required in any Fiscal Year to meet the needs of CFD No. 2003-1 to: (i) pay for fire protection and suppression services (ii) pay for police protection services (iii) pay Administrative Expenses; less (iv) a credit for any funds available to reduce the annual Special Tax levy, as determined by the CFD Administrator. "State" means the State of Califomia. "Taxable Property" means all of the Assessor's Parcels within the boundaries of CFD No. 2003-1 which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below. "Undeveloped Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property not classified as Developed Property. B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CATEGORIES Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2003-1 shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to Section C. Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 and 2 based on the type of structure located on the Assessor's Parcel. Non -Retail Commercial/Industrial Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 3. C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE 1. Special Tax A The Special Tax A is an annual Special Tax that shall be levied on Developed Property to fund the Special Tax Requirement. a. Developed Property (i) Maximum Special Tax A The Maximum Special Tax A for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 for each Land Use Class is shown below in Table 1. City of San Jacinto October 30, 2003 Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 Page 4 TABLE 1 Maximum Special Tax A for Developed Property For Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 Land Use Class Description Maximum Special Tax A 1 Single Family Property $350 per unit 2 Apartment Property $262.50 per unit 3 Non Retail Commercial/Industrial Property $0.119 per SF of Floor Area (ii) Increase in the Maximum Special Tax A On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2004, the Maximum Special Tax A shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Year. (iii) Multiple Land Use Classes In some instances an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax that can be levied on an Assessor's Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Taxes that can be levied for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Parcel. b. Undeveloped Property No Special Tax A shall be levied on Undeveloped Property. City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 October 30, 2003 Page 5 2. Special Tax B The Special Tax B is a one-time Special Tax that shall be paid directly to the City at the time a building permit for new construction is issued for an Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property. a. Maximum Special Tax B The Maximum Special Tax B for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 for each Land Use Class is shown below in Table 2. TABLE 2 Maximum Special Tax B For Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 Land Use Class Description Maximum Special Tax B 1 Single Family Property $600 per unit 2 Apartment Property $450 per unit 3 Non -Retail Commercial/Industrial Property $0.204 per SF of Floor Area b. Increase in the Maximum Special Tax B On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2004, the Maximum Special Tax B shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Year. D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX 1. Special Tax A Commencing with Fiscal Year 2003-2004 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement. The Council shall levy the Special Tax A until the amount of Special Taxes equals the Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax A as needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement. City of San Jacinto October 30, 2003 Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 Page 6 Notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax A levied against any Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten percent as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Parcel within CFD No. 2003-1. 2. Special Tax B Commencing with Fiscal Year 2003-04 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall levy the Special Tax B on each Assessor's Parcel that is subject to the Special Tax B at 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax B. The Special Tax B shall be collected by the City at the time a building permit for new construction is issued for an Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property. E. EXEMPTIONS No Special Tax shall be levied on Retail Commercial Property, Property Ownpr Association Property or Public Property. However, should an Assessor's Parcel no longer be classified as Retail Commercial Property, Property Owner Association Property or Public Property, its tax-exempt status will be revoked. F. APPEALS AND INTERPRETATIONS Any landowner or resident may file a written appeal of the Special Tax on his/her property with the CFD Administrator, provided that the appellant is current in his/her payments of Special Taxes. During the pendency of an appeal, all Special Taxes previously levied must be paid on or before the payment date established when the levy was made. The appeal must specify the reasons why the appellant claims the Special Tax is in error. The CFD Administrator shall review the appeal, meet with the appellant if the CFD Administrator deems necessary, and advise the appellant of its determination. If the CFD Administrator agrees with the appellant, the CFD Administrator shall eliminate or reduce the Special Tax on the appellant's property and/or provide a refund to the appellant. If the CFD Administrator disagrees with the appellant and the appellant is dissatisfied with the determination, the appellant then has 30 days in which to appeal to the Council by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk, provided that the appellant is current in his/her payments of Special Taxes. The second appeal must specify the reasons for its disagreement with the CFD Administrator's determination. Interpretations may be made by the Council by ordinance or resolution for purposes of clarifying any vagueness or ambiguity in this Rate and Method of Apportionment. City of San Jacinto October 30, 2003 Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 Page 7 G. MANNER OF COLLECTION The Special Tax A shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that in Fiscal Year 2004-05 and each Fiscal Year thereafter, CFD No. 2003-1 may directly bill the Special Tax A, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its fmancial obligations, and may covenant to foreclose and may actually foreclose on delinquent Assessor's Parcels as permitted by the Act. Commencing in Fiscal Year 2003-04, the Special Tax B shall be paid directly to the City. H. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX The Special Tax A and Special Tax B shall be levied as long as necessary to fund items (i) and (ii) of the Special Tax Requirement. K:1Clients2\San Jacinto\Mello\Police&Fire CFDIRMA\servicesrma9.doc City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 October 30, 2003 Page 8 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-1 TO CONSIDER AUTHORIZING THE FUTURE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 2003-01 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, California ("City Council"), desires to provide for the future annexation of territory to a community facilities district pursuant to the provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the "Act"). Such Community Facilities District is designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 ("CFD No. 2003-01"). The area proposed to be annexed in the future shall be known and designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 ("FUTURE ANNEXATION AREA") (the "Future Annexation Area"). DESCRIPTION OF FUTURE ANNEXATION AREA The territory that is proposed to annexed to CFD No. 2003-1 (the "Future Annexation Area") includes all of that territory included within the boundaries of a map designated as Future Annexation Area of CFD No. 2003-1 of the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of California, as previously approved by this legislative body, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto at the address set forth below and available for public inspection during normal business hours of such. Any parcel within the Future Annexation Area shall be required to annex to CFD No. 2003-1 as a condition precedent to the approval of any discretionary land use entitlement for such parcel. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES TO BE FINANCED BY THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES ON TERRITORY WITHIN THE FUTURE ANNEXATION AREA The types of services proposed to be financed by the levy of special taxes upon the territory within the Future Annexation Area upon the annexation of such territory to CFD No. 2003-1 are generally described as follows: (a) Additional police protection services including, but not limited to, criminal justice services; and (b) additional fire suppression and protection services. The fire services shall, to the maximum extent practicable taking into account budgetary and operational demands of CFD No. 2003-1, be provided in common within CFD No. 2003-1 and the Future Annexation Area. SPECIAL TAX It has been proposed that, except where funds are otherwise available, a special tax sufficient to finance the fire services and facilities described above and related incidental expenses authorized by the Act will be levied annually against all non-exempt real property in that territory within the Future Annexation Area that has annexed to CFD No. 2003-1. The levy of such special tax will be secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all such territory. For further particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax (the "Rate and Method of Apportionment"), which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment to allow each landowner or resident to clearly estimate the maximum amount that such person will have to pay for such services and facilities. Under no circumstances will the Special Tax A (as defined in the Rate and Method of Apportionment) be increased as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other parcel or parcels used for private residential purposes by more than 10 percent. The special taxes, to the extent possible, shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes or in such other manner at the Board of Directors, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 2003-1, or its designee shall determine, including direct billing of the affected property owners. Such special taxes shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency as applicable for ad valorem taxes. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County of Riverside tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by CFD No. 2003-1. A copy of the Rate and Method of Apportionment is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, located at 201 East Main Street, San Jacinto, California and is available for inspection during normal business hours of such office. EFFECTIVE DATE OF ANNEXATION If the proceedings to provide for the future annexation of the Future Annexation Area to CFD No. 2003-1 are approved, the actual annexation of any parcel within the Future Annexation Area to CFD No. 2003-1 shall become effective only upon the unanimous approval of the owner or owners of such parcel at the time the parcel is proposed to be annexed. No future public hearing or additional proceedings will be required to complete the annexation of such a parcel if the owner or owners of such parcel have given their unanimous approval to the annexation of such parcel. 2 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR MAY 20, 2004, AT THE HOUR OF 7:00 P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE CITY COUNCIL BEING THE OFFICES OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO LOCATED AT THE SAN JACINTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD ROOM, 2685 SOUTH SAN JACINTO AVENUE, SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AT WHICH TIME THE CITY COUNCIL, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CFD NO. 2003-1, WILL HEAR ALL EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY BY ALL INTERESTED PERSONS, PROPERTY OWNERS, VOTERS AND TAXPAYERS, RELATING GENERALLY TO THE FOLLOWING: A. Authorization to provide for the annexation of the Future Annexation Area to CFD No. 2003-1; B. Authorization to levy special taxes in any territory within the Future Annexation Area upon the annexation of such territory to CFD No. 2003-1. All persons interested, including but not limited to the owners of property within the CFD No. 2003-1 and the Future Annexation Area and persons registered to vote at addresses within CFD No. 2003-1 and the Future Annexation Area, for or against the provision for the future annexation of the Future Annexation Area to CFD No. 2003-1 may appear and present evidence and testimony relating to the proposal to provide for the annexation in the future of the Future Annexation Area to CFD No. 2003-1, the authorization to levy special taxes within any territory that annexes to CFD No. 2003-1 and the services proposed to be financed from the proceeds of such special taxes. Any protest pertaining to the regularity of the proceedings must be in writing and shall be filed with the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto on behalf of the Board of Directors of CFD No. 2003-1 on or before the time set for the hearing. If 50% or more of the registered voters or six (6) registered voters, whichever is more, residing within CFD No. 2003-1, or if 50% or more of the registered voters or six (6) registered voters, whichever is more, residing in the Future Annexation Area, or if the owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the territory included in CFD No. 2003-1, or if the owners of one- half or more of the land in the Future Annexation Area, file written protests against the proposed annexation of the Future Annexation Area to CFD No. 2003-1 in the future, and such protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than a majority, no further proceedings to provide for the annexation of the Future Annexation Area to CFD No. 2003-1 shall be undertaken for a period of one year from the date of decision of the Legislative Body following the conclusion of the public hearing. INQUIRIES For any questions relating to these proceedings, please contact Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk, City of San Jacinto, at offices of the City of San Jacinto located at 201 East Main Street, San Jacinto, California, 92583 or by telephone at 909-654-7737. For further particulars, reference is made to the Resolution No. 2537 of the Board of Directors of CFD No. 2003-1 adopted on April 15, 2004 and Ordinance 04-10 of the City Council as the Legislative Body of CFD No. 2003-1 adopted on May 6, 2004. Such resolution and ordinance are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 and open for public inspection during normal office hours of such office. 4 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING OF 1HL CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 2003-1 TO CONSIDER AUTHORIZING THE FUTURE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 2003-01 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, Califomia ("City Council"), desires to provide for the future annexation of territory to a community facilities district pursuant to the provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982" (the "Act"). Such Community Facilities District is designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-01 ("CFD No. 2003-01"). The area proposed to be annexed in the future shall be known and designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 ("FUTURE ANNEXATION AREA") (the "Future Annexation Area"). DESCRIPTION OF FUTURE ANNEXATION AREA The territory that is proposed to annexed to CFD No. 2003-1 (the "Future Annexation Area") includes all of that territory included within the boundaries of a map designated as Future Annexation Area of CFD No. 2003-1 of the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of California, as previously approved by this legislative body, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto at the address set forth below and available for public inspection during normal business hours of such. Any parcel within the Future Annexation Area shall be required to annex to CFD No. 2003-1 as a condition precedent to the approval of any discretionary land use entitlement for such parcel. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES TO BE FINANCED BY THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES ON TERRITORY WITHIN THE FUTURE ANNEXATION AREA The types of services proposed to be financed by the levy of special taxes upon the territory within the Future Annexation Area upon the annexation of such territory to CFD No. 2003-1 are generally described as follows: (a) Additional police protection services including, but not limited to, criminal justice services; and (b) additional fire suppression and protection services. The fire services shall, to the maximum extent practicable taking into account budgetary and operational demands of CFD No. 2003-1, be provided in common within CFD No. 2003-1 and the Future Annexation Area. SPECIAL TAX It has been proposed that, except where funds are otherwise available, a special tax sufficient to finance the fire services and facilities described above and related incidental expenses authorized by the Act will be levied annually against all non-exempt real property in that territory within the Future Annexation Area that has annexed to CFD No. 2003-1. The levy of such special tax will be secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all such territory. For further particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax (the "Rate and Method of Apportionment"), which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment to allow each landowner or resident to clearly estimate the maximum amount that such person will have to pay for such services and facilities. Under no circumstances will the Special Tax A (as defined in the Rate and Method of Apportionment) be increased as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other parcel or parcels used for private residential purposes by more than 10 percent. The special taxes, to the extent possible, shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes or in such other manner at the Board of Directors, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 2003-1, or its designee shall determine, including direct billing of the affected property owners. Such special taxes shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency as applicable for ad valorem taxes. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County of Riverside tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by CFD No. 2003-1. A copy of the Rate and Method of Apportionment is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, located at 201 East Main Street, San Jacinto, California and is available for inspection during normal business hours of such office. EFFECTIVE DATE OF ANNEXATION If the proceedings to provide for the future annexation of the Future Annexation Area to CFD No. 2003-1 are approved, the actual annexation of any parcel within the Future Annexation Area to CFD No. 2003-1 shall become effective only upon the unanimous approval of the owner or owners of such parcel at the time the parcel is proposed to be annexed. No future public hearing or additional proceedings will be required to complete the annexation of such a parcel if the owner or owners of such parcel have given their unanimous approval to the annexation of such parcel. 2 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 3, 2004, AT THE HOUR OF 7:00 P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE CITY COUNCIL BEING THE OFFICES OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO LOCATED AT THE SAN JACINTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD ROOM, 2685 SOUTH SAN JACINTO AVENUE, SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AT WHICH TIME THE CITY COUNCIL, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CFD NO. 2003-1, WILL HEAR ALL EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY BY ALL INTERESTED PERSONS, PROPERTY OWNERS, VOTERS AND TAXPAYERS, RELATING GENERALLY TO THE FOLLOWING: A. Authorization to provide for the annexation of the Future Annexation Area to CFD No. 2003-1; B. Authorization to levy special taxes in any territory within the Future Annexation Area upon the annexation of such territory to CFD No. 2003-1. All persons interested, including but not limited to the owners of property within the CFD No. 2003-1 and the Future Annexation Area and persons registered to vote at addresses within CFD No. 2003-1 and the Future Annexation Area, for or against the provision for the future annexation of the Future Annexation Area to CFD No. 2003-1 may appear and present evidence and testimony relating to the proposal to provide for the annexation in the future of the Future Annexation Area to CFD No. 2003-1, the authorization to levy special taxes within any territory that annexes to CFD No. 2003-1 and the services proposed to be financed from the proceeds of such special taxes. Any protest pertaining to the regularity of the proceedings must be in writing and shall be filed with the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto on behalf of the Board of Directors of CFD No. 2003-1 on or before the time set for the hearing. If 50% or more of the registered voters or six (6) registered voters, whichever is more, residing within CFD No. 2003-1, or if 50% or more of the registered voters or six (6) registered voters, whichever is more, residing in the Future Annexation Area, or if the owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the territory included in CFD No. 2003-1, or if the owners of one- half or more of the land in the Future Annexation Area, file written protests against the proposed annexation of the Future Annexation Area to CFD No. 2003-1 in the future, and such protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than a majority, no further proceedings to provide for the annexation of the Future Annexation Area to CFD No. 2003-1 shall be undertaken for a period of one year from the date of decision of the Legislative Body following the conclusion of the public hearing. INQUIRIES For any questions relating to these proceedings, please contact Dorothy Chouinard, City Clerk, City of San Jacinto, at offices of the City of San Jacinto located at 201 East Main Street, San Jacinto, California, 92583 or by telephone at 909-654-7737. For further particulars, reference is made to the Resolution No. 2537 of the Board of Directors of CFD No. 2003-1 adopted on April 15, 2004. Such resolution is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 and open for public inspection during normal office hours of such office. 4 AGENDA ITEM June 6, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Peter A. Consentini, City Manager SUBJECT: Council's Goals Process RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Council go through the goals process outlined in this report. BACKGROUND: Whenever I come to work for a new Council, I believe it is healthy for our relationship to go through a goals process that gives the new manager an idea of what the Council wants to accomplish. In our limited resources environment, it is important that I know the priorities of the Council so I can allocate our limited resources on the projects the Council believes are most important. We also need to discuss a tracking system for the goals. Council wanted to consider a tracking system from Vice Mayor Buydos. The attached staff report dated September 14, 2000 was given to me by Vice Mayor Buydos for discussion. City Manager: Finance Director Ap r�) Page 1 of 3 THE PROCESS: The goals process will include two segments: Segment I — Identify the Council's Goals - Council and staff will go through a goals process. Step 1: As a starting point, Council will review the most current status report on the former goals (copy attached). Council will also review the most recent copy of the Council follow-up report to view the projects, programs, and assignments that staff is currently pursuing, at the direction of Council. Step 2: One at a time, Council Members will take turns articulating goals. Each Council Member will take turns stating a goal until all goals are stated. Staff will be available to assist the Council with input and advice. Step 3: After all goals are listed, staff and Council will take each Council goal and discuss a scope of work for each goal. This is an important part of the process because staff can give the Council the benefit of their experience. Council Members can easily identify what they want; however, staff may be more familiar with the technical aspects, processes, and programs that can best deliver the desired product. Step 4: The Council's goals will be typed out on a sheet of paper so the Council can go through a voting and prioritization process, so the Council can prioritizes their goals. This will complete the first segment of the goals process. Segment II — Funding Determination Once the Council has identified and prioritized the goals, staff will then proceed to estimate the cost associated with the implementation of the Goals. Staff will identify optional funding sources in a report that will be developed and delivered at a future regular Council meeting to consider the implementation and funding of the goals. Page 2 of 3 JUSTIFICATION: It is wise to have a newly formed Council go through a goals process to determine the new direction of the Council. BUDGETARY IMPACT: Unknown — to be determined until Segment II of process is completed. Peter A. Cosentini City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Sample Tracking System — Staff Report Dated 09/14/2000 2. Old Goal's Report 3. Council Follow-up Report 4. Staff Input to Goals Process Page 3 of 3 STAFF REPORT DATE: September 14, 2000 SUBJECT: Update on JPC Actions, Legislation and Staff Activities The format of the report has been modified, and a table added to specifically monitor our progress in reaching and obtaining the Goals for 2000. This repori on JPA staff activities covers the period July 13, 2000 - September 14, 2000. It is an information and status report on selected staff and JPC-directed activities. In addition to this report, there are separate update reports on the activities of the Caretaker Cooperative Agreement program and the March Inland Port. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONVEYANCE (EDC) Letter from Defense Finance Accounting Service (DFAS) dated August 1, 2000 was received with respect to payment of disputed lease payments. Staff responded with a request for debt determination on August 16, 2000. POTENTIAL REUSE PROJECTS Exclusive Right to Negotiate. At the July 2000 JPC meeting, the Commission selected Lennar partners to be the Master Developer for West March. Staff and Lennar are meeting on elements that will result in the formulation of an Exclusive Right to Negotiate for the West March property. Weapons Storage Area. Since the Weapons Storage Area is part of the area included for negotiations with the West March Master Developer, Pyro Spectaculars is amending their proposal to lease the property to utilize the existing facilities, under a termed -lease. This property is being surveyed for transfer, with transfer anticipated by the end of the year. Additionally, at the request of City of Riverside Council members, Pyro Spectaculars held a public meeting on August 1, 2000, and no members attic public attended this meeting. Their business plan has been reviewed and determined to be complete. U.S. Veterans Initiative. A proposal was presented to the Commission for action at the February meeting. That proposal was approved. U.S. Vets have supplied the additional information, and that information is being forwarded to Byrd & Associates for review and concurrence that the business plan is complete. Staff has initiated a lease request with the AFBCA for the properties and facilities Paee -l- U.S. Vets included in their business plan. Once the lease arrangement with the AFBCA is known, U.S. Vets and staff will commence with documentation for site control and entitlement to implement the business an of U.S. Vets. MARCH JPA HOMELESS ASSISTANCE PLAN In March, the JPA filed a complaint in U.S. District Court stating that the actions of the Department of Health and Human Services (NHS) in 1994 were illegal, and the JPA is now awaiting court action on that filing. At the direction of the Commission, staff is now working with two of the homeless assistance providers that were included in the JPA=s proposed Homeless Assistance Plan. Dates for actual occupancy and program services are undetermined. UTILITIES Water and Sewer. Transfer of the Water and Sewer Systems is included on the zero -cost economic development conveyance. The AFBCA is completing the environmental work on the transfer of the two systems, and a deed transfer may be completed in Year 2001. Staff met with Western Municipal Water District (WMWD) on July 11, 2000 regarding preparation of the water and wastewater systems. A business plan and proposal should be forthcoming in Fall 2000. WMWD has requested $4,000,000 in federal assistance for the construction of a wastewater reclamation and reuse facility improvement at the March sewage treatment plant through Proposition 13 funds. Natural Gas. Segregation of the natural gas system has been completed by the SC Gas Company. Electric. The AFRC has segregated the electric system; however, segregation of the system is not a complete segregation, as the circuits that serve the cantonment, as well as non -cantonment are fed by the electrical substations within the cantonment. Through three recent power outages, this has been found to be highly problematic_ The Chair and Executive Director met with Mr. Randall Yim, Deputy Under Secretary of the Department of Defense regarding the issue of the electric system pursuant to the Jetter addressed to Mr. Yim by the Chair of July 7, 2000. Telecommunications. As of January 1, 2000, the Air Force Reserves assumed the operation and the maintenance of the telecommunications system until the surplus portion of the systems is transferred to the March JPA via the economic development conveyance process. The exception to this is maintenance of the system in the Green Acres housing area, and that responsibility will remain with the Caretaker program. CONSULTING ASSISTANCE Lobbying assistance in Washington, D.C. - Copeland, Lowery & Jacquez. Lynn Jacquez has been working with staff regarding designation under the Military Airport Program and on other potential FAA sources of funds. Periodically she assists with the recruitment of cargo carriers, and s continues to monitor other general DC actions that may affect the reuse of March. An addition project for potential funding in 2000 has been submitted to FAA. Page -2- Infrastructure inventory & Analysis Plan. Psomas and WMWD are under way with the mapping and aerial controls for the Infrastructure Inventory and Analysis Plan. Full inventory with field verification should be completed by the end of the year, with master planning completed three A, utility months thede velopmeni to support base rlan will ermit the Marcheuse effortspurveyots and master developers to pursue infrastructure Record of Survey. Psomas was selected to provide record of survey for parcels to be transferred on West March. Records of survey for the first parcels shall be recorded by the end of the year, which will facilitate transfer of property by deed as well. REDEVELOPM ENT n acv merit Project #1 RA-98-01: CDFProject Preliminary plans must be completed by October 200 2000 and 90%working drawings by January 2001. These dates are critical so project funding can be secured under the State=s 2001/2002 budget. Geotechnical and survey work has been conducted. FILMING Staff has shown various facilities for a couple of movies lately. No commitment has been made to date. The hospital and Green Acres Estates continue to be of great interest for filming. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE No reportable actions. FOREIGN TRADE ZONE APPLICATION The Department of Commerce approved the designation of a Foreign Trade Zone at March in August 2000. See agenda item No. l2b for further detail. ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES Stan Recruitment of the Airport Manager position ended with five applicants being interviewed on June 22, 2000, however after extending an offer for employment, the position has not been filled. The opening created by the resignation of the Executive Director is being addressed by the creation of a recruitment package. Interviews were held on September 14 and 15, 2000. It is anticipated that appointment will be made at the October 2000 meeting. Trade and Commerce (T&C) Grant Funding requests to partially match the TEA-21 grant for the Oleander Avenue Extension and an application to provide the cash match to the OEA were both approved in January. Pape -3- Annual Budcets Annual budgets for the JPA, the Redevelopment Agency, and the Airport Authority were approved at the June JPC meeting. Each budget was reviewed by the TAC in May, the Commissions Finance Committee. Conflict of Interest Codes The JPA is required to review and amend, if necessary, its Conflict of Interest Codes in 2000. A biennial report is then to be submitted to the State. This must be done by October 1, 2000. Marketin A new marketing economic development brochure for the March Inland Port. CCB - 9/14/00 W :UPC\update-s ept. rpt. wpd n a Page -4- The March Joint Powers Authority GOALS FOR 2000 At its annual Planning meeting, the March Joint Powers Commission reviewed its accomplishments for 1999 and its objectives for the new year. As a result of that discussion, the following Goals are proposed to be approved by the JPC as work program objectives for 2000. Goal / Objective Status Real Property Disposition Begin implementation of the March JPA approved Homeless Assistance Plan by Providers contacted, no commitment to commencement dates. initiating acquisition of the properties from the Air Force and leasing those properties to the approved homeless assistance providers. Obtain resolution to the suit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in the U.S. District Court. Awaiting a court date. Obtain the Final Record of Decision on real property at March Air Force Base. Issued for most of March. ROD awaiting HHS lawsuit. Amend the approved Economic Development Conveyance Application to include all parcels included in the Final Record of Decision. Obtain 3-5 of the properties included in the Economic Development Conveyance through deed transfer. Facilitate the conveyance of Public Benefit Transfers to approved agencies. Enter into formal business arrangements with utility purveyors for the the utility systemsgas and including the issuance of a Request for Qualifications/Proposals o telecommunications systems. Pursue the option of lease -backs with the Department of Defense non -cantonment island properties on March AFB. and Prepare and implement a long-term business plan for the maintenance, upgrade operation of Green Acres Estates, including the establishment of a Trust Fund for Capital Replacement. Draw -down the Caretaker Program so that the program can be phased out completely in 2001. See above. Legal survey and description work commenced June 2000. West March Parcels to commence transfer by end of year. On -going. Request for proposals from current providers have been requested. No negotiations have taken place. March JPA may consider going out with RFP by Fall 2000. Position of the March JPA still stands. No reportable action by the Air Force. No reportable action. No reportable action. Infrastructure / Site Preparation Complete the final engineering, property acquisition, bid process and construction of Property acquisition phase currently underway. Project bid plans to be completed the Oleander Avenue Extension (TEA-21) project. October 2000. Purchase all SKR Mitigation Credits required on property that will be owned or Currently being acquired, as authorized by the Commission controlled by the March JPA. • . Develop a plan and study the upgrade of the Sewage Treatment Plan, including the demarcation of March / Riverside service capacity areas. Infrastructure Inventory and Analysis Plan was initiated April 2000. Additionally WMWD has applied for Proposition 13 funds to upgrade the Sewage Treatment Plant. Complete the Infrastructure Inventory and Analysis Plan funded by OEA. See above. Seek funds to develop a Project Study Report for the Van Buren Interchange. No reportable action. Submit an application for funding for ASite Demolition at Arnold Heights@ to the Economic Development Administration, Property has not transferred. Staff will commence with contact with EDA to draft an application to submit, once property has transferred. Complete the Area Drainage Master Plan for the March JPA. Proposed Plan to be submitted November 2000 for consideration. Solicit funding for the development of storm drain improvements to the Heacock and Oleander Storm Drains to alleviate infrastructure deficiencies at March Inland Port No reportable action. March Inland Port Aviation Infrastructure Complete the design, engineering, bid specifications, bid process, construction, and installation of improvements to the instrumentation landing system (ILS) to Category Final plans have FAA approval. March JPA is working with AFRC to finalize the plans for authorization to bid the project. Two (CAT-ii) standards. No reportable action. Solicit funding to construct taxiway widening projects. FAA expressed concerns August 2000. March JPA t. Obtain designation as a Military Airport Program (MAP) Airport. MAP application has been filed. working on those issues to seek designation FY 2001. Solicit funding through an FAA earmark for the development and installation of a fueling system to serve March Inland Port. March Inland Port Development by No reportable action. anc Occu issued June 2000. Occupancy Complete the Philips Consumer Electronics facility for occupancy and operation the end of June. Lia :Jomplete engineering and design plans and proceed with construction of the facility and associated infrastructure for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection planned air attack base at March Inland Port. Engineering plans commenced June 2000, and Preliminary Plans (35%) are scheduled for completion October 2000, with Working Drawings (95%) to be completed by January 2001. Construction is estimated to be funded for commencement in July 2001. In cooperation with the March Inland CargoPort Development, LLC, initiate the development of a speculative ramp -side facility. No reportable action. Assist and facilitate the development and expansion of the March Air Field Museum. Master Plan has been approved and plans are underway for implementation of their project. Pursue the option to purchase land to the south and east of March Inland Port to preserve for future growth and expansion of the airport. No reportable action. Protect March Air Reserve Base and the March Inland Port from land use encroachment and incompatible uses through joint planning efforts with the member jurisdictions. Initiated Aviation Overlay Zone work July 2000. Ordinance is scheduled for completion October 2000, with all jurisdictions then proceeding with the ordinance adoption process. March Inland Port Operations Continue to host the Boeing Corporation for test flight operations. On -going. Seek a fixed base operator for March Inland Port, including the option of being a fixed base operator for the Air Force Reserve Command at March, either through joint venture, contract or otherwise. Negotiate and implement an Operating Agreement with the Air Force Reserve Command. Promote and market the March Inland Port and pursue air cargo operators in cooperation with the March Inland CargoPort Development, LLC. Property Development & Partnership Complete the selection and negotiate a business agreement with a MasterDeveloper(s) for West March EDC properties. Negotiate with utility purveyors for the development, operation and serving of the March JPA Planning Area. Lev)demonstration Promote March gasthe of ion oe f aSpeed maintenanceMfaeiltty and technolo oroiect, includng No reportable action. Currently in progress. On -going. Attended Air Cargo Conference in Alaska. Responded to requests by carriers -issued proposals. Looking to conduct follow-up visits from the April visits to cargo carriers. Selected Lennar Partners July 2000. Currently working on the negotiations of an Exclusive Right to Negotiate. No reportable action. Position and resolution passed April 2000. center. Enter into a long -teen agreement for the operation of the Golf Course. Completed in May 2000. Pursue leasing of the Weapons Storage Area to an appropriate tenant. Ready to lease, upon transfer of the property in late 2000. Ne interested in entering a Disposition and Development Agreement. Procure long-term financing as the Agency, including a bond issuance for the construction of the Air Attack Base ramp facility. No reportable action. Legislative Agenda Obtain the designation as a Foreign Trade Zone for the March Inland Port from the U.S. Department of Commerce. Hearing - February 2000 held Reporting/Determination anticipated September 2000 Promote and strengthen the military missions at March Air Reserve Base, by seeking allocation of C-17s to March. On -going efforts, assist the AFRC and Legislative delegation as appropriate Obtain federal aviation funding for the civilian aviation fueling system. In progress with Copeland Lowry and Jacquez. Obtain State funding through the Defense Adjustment Program Fund, and petition for continuance of the Fund and program. On -going. Negotiate and enter into an Aviation Fuel Tax Collection Sharing agreement with the No reportable action. County of Riverside. ( Contract for services July 2000 JPC meeting. First product due October 2000, with second phase to be initiated thereafter. Complete joint use aviation planning with the member jurisdictions for the compatibility of March Inland Port and future growth and development of the area. Assignment 1. Soboba TIER I Coordinate Phase I and Phase II or lbarra Professional Services Agreement — City Manager Wager meeting with Mickey Ibarra on January 21, 2002 Amendment No. 1 — Extending the PSA with Mickey Ibarra & Associates for an additional 11-month. Copy of application of land into trust received on April 10, 2002. Staff to commence review for completeness. Comments submitted on 6/12/2002 to BIA Re: Environmental Assessment 8/13/2002 — Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians withdrew BIA application — Soboba to resubmit application with territory additions and changes to the scope of work Professional Service Agreement with Mickey Ibarra & Associates extended by City Council 1/09/2003 Meeting between the City and BIA/Soboba Band of Luisefio Indians being coordinated by Mickey Ibarra- Tentative Date May 15, 2003 Annexation withdrawn Negotiations with Tribal Council/City Council to start soon PSA with Mickey Ibarra re -negotiated 10/16/2003 2. EDA Grant/Sewer Lift Station & Waterline A. Secure all funds necessary (Pending USFWS Clearance) B. Complete all procedural issues with EMWD relating to EDA/County funds (USFWS Clearance received 4/25/02) C. Obtain Council approval of modified EMWD Agreement EMWD reviewing engineer's estimate for lift station — City will take the lead on the bid advertisement, contract award, and project administration; EMWD to inspect the lift station; City will be the lead for design waterline project, advertisement, award of contract and inspection. D. Meeting scheduled for 5/14/02between City and EMWD to discuss final funding of water/sewer project E. Revised agreement approved by EMWD Board F. Notice to Bid Authorization approved by City Council on 6/20/02; G. Plans and Specifications available — Bid Opening 8/30/2002 Revised 04/06/04 Responsible Party/ Estimated Due Date Cosentini 10/14/2001 COMPLETE 02/21/2002 COMPLETE Hults In Progress COMPLETE 6/20/02 H. Bid Award scheduled for 9/5/2002 06/05/02 I. Construction work scheduled to start October 7, 2002 and to be 06/20/02 completed by July 3, 2003 — high water levels causing delay of project — sewer force realigned J. Ramona Boulevard/Sanderson Avenue Waterline Under Construction — Estimated Completion June 21, 2004. (-) C C c TIER I - COMPLETION Assignment 1. Tony's Sea Landing Close escrow with Valley Bank. 2. SGT Negotiations Complete remaining M.O.U. 3.Competition Park Monitor all CUP issues associated with this use — Operations ceased 6/07/2002 4. Connectivity Project Complete connectivity project arrangement with Riverside County: A. Council Approval B. Complete Installation — County MIS staff on site at San Jacinto installing wiring C. Final physical improvements to accommodate equipment D. PC's being installed week of 9/16/2002 E. Connectivity Employee Training taking place F. Connectivity and e-mail complete 5.CFD No. 2002-1 A. Implementation of M.O.U. B. City Council action of 3/7/02 allowed the scheduled foreclosure sales of CFD No. 2 to occur on March 2151 and March 281h' C. On Monday, June 3, 2002, staff met with development team to discuss land use entitlement process and discuss LLPD # 2 impact D. Eight Tentative Tract Maps applications received 5/3/02 for Rancho San Jacinto Development — Planning Commission Public Hearing scheduled for 8/21/2002 E. Preliminary hydrology review comments completed 07/29/2002 F. Formation election for CFD # 2002-1 held successfully 9/10/2002 G. Long Term Extension of Time for Development Agreement 1-89 Responsible Party/ Estimated Due Date Wager/Lanier 12/21/2001 COMPLETE Wager/Bohn/Matthew/Floyd 01/11/2002 COMPLETE Hults COMPLETE Wager/Simon 9/20/2001 12/06/2001 6/2002 COMPLETE Wager/Simon 04/2002 COMPLETE being discussed with developer (11/21/2002 C.C. action) H. Extension of Development Agreement 1-89 scheduled for Planning Commission 01/16/2003; P.H. before City Council scheduled for 02/06/2003 — Ordinance approving Development Agreement introduced on 02/06/2003; second reading scheduled for 02/20/2003 0 1� G► TIER II Assignment 1. Warwick Erosion Problem A. Complete Eminent Domain — Pre judgment possession deposit in the amount of $7,452 placed with the State of California Deposits Fund on December 2001. B. Drainage improvements- complete. C. City working with developer to complete punch list items for Tract 24738. D. Court Hearing for purchase of property pending 2. Downtown Improvements A. Final plans to Council B. Bid solicitation — Bid Opening January 24, 2002 C. Bid Award with changes to scope of work in order to reduce construction cost — City Council on 2-21-2002, rejected all bids received 1/24/2002 and directed staff to meet with landscape architect to work on changes to the project, reducing the scope of work. D. Landscape architect revising the Downtown Plans — plans delivered to City Hall 5/8/2002 E. Re -advertisement of bids — May 2003 F. Bids received 07/07/2003 — Bid award scheduled for 07/24/2003 G. Project Under Construction — completion pending delivery of one street light 3. Grant Applications On going effort to identify grant opportunities for all phases of municipal operations A. Rehabilitation and Improvement of Existing Rancho Area Non - Motorized Trail Submitted October 2002 (2"d Attempt) — Denied B. City Makeover Program - $75,000 Grant Application with MWD - Approved C. Landscape Conservation Demonstration Program Grant Application with EMWD - $25,000 (Estudillo Mansion) — Grant Approved 02/19/2003 D. Alcoholic Beverage Control Grant Application in the amount of $51,422 — to be utilized on an ABC licensee compliance project — 04/17/2003 4. On -going maintenance and enhancement of web page 5. Comprehensive Sign Ordinance — Review and Modification The review must specifically address billboards — Marco Martinez of BB&K providing recommendation to City to conduct a survey of all signs in the City Responsible Party/ Estimated Due Date BB&K 12/06/2001 4/22/02- COMPLETE Motlagh/Hults 10/4/2001 01/24/2002 02/21/2002 12/2002 On -going On -going Hults prior to starting any type of signage abatement program 05/01/2002 6. Comprehensive Truck Use — Review and Modifications Hults/Motlagh/Simmons Review to encompass weight limits, truck routes, and hours of operation; 07/01/2002 permitting, and truck parking (done). Weight limits and wide load permits must have the review of City Attorney and must comply with recent legislation approved by FAA. U LI o TIER II COMPLETION Assignment 1. Year End Report Publish Year End Report, mail out to all residents, and business Publish 2"d year end report prior to State of the City speech — Available for distribution 10/09/2002 and mailed to City residents and business November 2002 - 3`d Year publication completed October 2003 2. Implementation Plan II A. Submit draft to City Council for review and comment B. Adopt Implementation Plan II 3. Water Development Fees Resolution Review policy issues with Water Committee and issue report to City Council 4. Road Projects Secure authorization to obtain bids and commence construction. A. Miscellaneous Pavement Rehabilitation (Lyon, Pepperwood/Lori Ann, Lake Park Drive, Tract 24054 and Virginia Lee Parking Lot) — Bid Awarded and project under construction — Project Complete 4/4/2002 B. Sanderson Avenue Rehabilitation (Esplanade to Cottonwood) — Bid Opening 2/24/2002 — Bids opened 2/24/02; contract awarded 3/7/02. Construction under way — Estimated opening of road 6/14/2002 Idyllwild Drive improvements — Deleted from FY 2002-2003 budget due to Measure "A" fund shortfall 5. Deputy City Clerk Hire A. Review application submitted B. Set interviews and make offer C. Start date 6. Road Projects A. Ramona Boulevard Sidewalks — Bid Advertisement started 10/24/2002 — Bid opening scheduled for November 25, 2002 Responsible Party/ Estimated Due Date Wager/Alvarez 11/30/2001 COMPLETE Lanier/Williams 11/2002 COMPLETE Cosentini/Alvarez Wager 9/21/2001 11/15/2001 COMPLETE Motlagh/Lavin COMPLETE Motlagh 04/09/2002 COMPLETE 07/14/2002 COMPLETE Wager/Bohn 9/10/2001 9/21/2001 10/15/2001 COMPLETE COMPLETE 06/09/2003 B. Contract Awarded to EPS, Inc. 01/09/2003 — Start of Construction 02/18/2003, estimated completion 05/18/2003 7. Estudillo Porch & Balcony A. Secure Council authorization to go out to bid — contract awarded to Mackone Development on November 15, 2001 B. Construction Complete 5/28/2002 8. GIS Hire A. Interview candidates B. Candidate to be in place — Carlo Umali started his employment with the City of San Jacinto December 17, 2001 9. Council Team Building Session Date has been set (January 12, 2002), and a facilitator has been selected. 10. Grant Applications On going effort to identify grant opportunities for all phases of municipal operations A. LLEBG — Acceptance of Grant B. Non -Motorized Trails — Application did not rank high enough for funding C. The California Heritage Fund Grant Program — grant application submitted by Mary Lanier for $50,000 grant towards Estudillo Mansion Improvements —Notification of Grant Approval received 5/8/2002 11. Five Point Traffic Signal A. Authorization to Proceed with Bid Advertisement pending Caltrans approval to proceed with construction and obligation of CMLG funds. B. Authorization to Advertise and Award Project received 08/28/2002 — Bid advertisement started August 30, 2002 C. Bid opening scheduled for 10/03/2002; contract award by City Council 10/17/2002; anticipated start of construction 12/2002; and anticipated project completion 04/30/2003 11. Sallee Park Renovation A. Presentation to Council by Sam Goepp B. City, Valley Wide and School District staff to develop Master Plan and timeline for submittal to all legislative bodies C. Construction plans for Sallee Park submitted to the City for review 08/02/2002 and subsequently approved. Hults/Lanier 9/20/2001 05/28/2002 COMPLETE HultsBohn Week of 9/3/2001 11/15/2001 COMPLETE Wager/Council 10/18/2001 COMPLETE On -going COMPLETE COMPLETE 05/2002 Motlagh COMPLETE W ager/Hults 12/06/2001 COMPLETE 07/09/2002 D. Bids received — construction project awarded to Adame Landscaping Co. Anticipated project completion 02/01/2003 E. Work under construction — park renovation complete 12. Resolution of pending personnel issues 13. Ground Water Management Plan A. Continue efforts to establish Groundwater Management Plan — Final issue needing resolution is Lake Hemet Municipal Water District's stream diversion B. Interim Principles for Water Management scheduled for approval by City Council 07/24/2003 - Approved 14. Skyview Park Wall A. Bid Award scheduled before City Council - Council rejected all bids pending comprehensive review of Park Development Funds B. Council approved construction of block wall on 08/21/2003 — construction scheduled to start 09/15/2003 — Block wall completed 15. Noble Trucking A. Follow up on summary judgment hearing action November 12, 2001 B. Seek federal lawsuit dismissal C. Superior court judge dismissed motion for summary judgment. D. Additional hearing set for mid -September 2002 E. 02/19/2003 - Extension of time requested to file appellate brief. F. Settlement completed — payment made 02/01/2003 COMPLETE Cosentini/Durden On -going Cosentini 3/1/2002 9/23/2002 COMPLETE 09/05/2002 10/03/2003 BB&K Must follow Superior Court action (Fall 2002) C] Li Assignment 1. Line E TIER III Continue to work with flood control for alternate Line "E" project. Present options to Council — RCFC & EMWD resumed talks on Line E Meeting scheduled @ Riverside County Flood Control on 3-4-2002 — RCFC and EMWD working together and trying to obtain R-O-W for project — Estimated Notice to Bid — December 2002 Agreement with RCFC&WCS for Construction of Line "E" Scheduled for January 23, 2003 - Agreement ratified by Board of Supervisors 02/11/2003 Bid advertisement scheduled for April 2003; construction estimated to begin in early June 2003 Public Works Contract Awarded by RCFC&WCD 08/2003 Project under construction 2. Adelphia Franchise Agreement Pending approval of franchise agreement with City of Hemet and completion of bankruptcy proceedings. City Manager to contact Jeff Ballinger regarding status of franchise renewal and bankruptcy proceedings. Franchise negotiations to start soon 3. Levee Project A. Finish environmental assessment; identify Phase II in association with flood control — review of draft environmental assessment complete. Final Biological Assessment Report Complete by CH2MHILL. B. City to enter into a Cooperative Agreement with RCFC for the 09/05/2002 preliminary engineering and environmental permits associated with the construction of this project C. Phase II Development — Albert A. Webb & Associates selected as RCFC&WCD and City's consultant for completion of environmental permits and preliminary engineering D. PSA with Albert A. Webb & Associates and Cooperative Agreements between City and RCFC&WCD approved on 12/05/2002 4. General Plan Hults Complete all elements of General Plan — Notice or Preparation of 06/2003 Responsible Party/ Estimated Due Date Motlagh Pending submission by RCFC Cosentini Motlagh 02/2002 CEQA document comment period expired 12/28/2001. Several entities commented. Preparation of Draft GP and EIR underway. First draft of the General Plan Received 09/05/2003 — Community Workshops scheduled for 9/17/2003 and 9/25/2003 5. Flood Control Master Han Commission consulting firm to update flood control master plan — City Motlagh Engineer recommends that RCFC take charge of the City's Flood Control Plaster Plan Upon completion of General Staff requested RCFC&WCD assistance in the update of the City's Plan Update Master Drainage Plan upon completion of the City's General Plan 6. Street Sign Replacement Lavin Complete street sign replacement program for FY 2001-2002: A. 1 S` Phase — main thoroughfares 2/14/02 B. 2nd Phase — on -going maintenance/replacement on -going C. Council authorized staff to acquire $19,503 worth of street signs for Phase II of street sign replacement 08/27/2003 — Street signs ordered and installed in an on -going basis 7. Budget Manuals/2001-2002Budget Process Simon Prepare how-to budget manual in advance of FY 2003-2004 budget 02/28/2003 preparation start-up 8. Well Protects Motlagh/Lavin A. Work with Water Committee to identify water well sites — 2/28/2002 — Joint Meeting of the City Councils of Hemet and San Jacinto directed both cities Ad -Hoc Committee Members to meet and discuss further the construction of a new well B. Water Ad -Hoc Committee scheduled for 5/29/02 @ 7:30 a.m. — Technical Committee from both cities to meet in June 2002 to identify water reservoir locations and future well sites C. Technical Committee recommendation for reservoir and well sites submitted to Council Ad -Hoc Committees for consideration on 07/29/2002- EMWD has indicated preferred site is not available D. Staff to prepare additional information in preparation of grant application. E. Plans and specifications for new well underway — Bid process completed and public works contract awarded 4/1/2004 02/28/2002 9. Hwv 79 Final Realignment Hults C] A. Final Realignment - Continue to work with General Plan Committee, consultants, and other agencies to identify the final route. 10. EMWD/City Sewer Boundary Resolve in agreement form with EMWD sewer collection/transmission issue — Agreement between City of Hemet and EWMD for sewer collection/transmission distributed to Water Ad Hoc Committee for review and comments City Attorney drafting new agreement between the City of San Jacinto and EMWD. Check with Jeff Ballinger regarding status of new agreement. First meeting with EMWD held on 12/23/2003 c., 12/31/2003 Wager/Motlagh 12/28/2001 a 0 TIER III COMPLETION Assignment 1. VEDC Workplan Present to Council a VEDC workplan for balance of FY 2001-2002 Response letter sent to VEDC on 12/20/2001 requesting VEDC's workplan. 2002-03 Workplan submitted 3/27/02 — Letter requesting more specific workplan mailed to VEDC 4/5/02 — Contract with Scope of Services pending approval by VEDC Meeting with City of Hemet VEDC Subcommittee scheduled for 03/12/2003 at 5:30 p.m. Contract with VEDC approved 2. So. Ca. Edison A. SCE New Franchise Agreement approved 4-4-2002 3. Infill Housin_g & Neighborhood Strategy Present to Council a comprehensive infill housing and neighborhood strategy plan. A. Study Session before the City Council B. Submit to City Council (Regular Meeting) 4. Acquisition of Sweeper/Striper Place into service new City street sweeper. Publish street sweeping schedule for the general public 5. Hwy 79 Interim Realignment A. Interim Realignment — Develop cooperative agreement with Caltrans and County of Riverside for the interim realignment of SR 79 from Gilman Springs Rd. to Ramona Expressway B. Official relinquishment effective 07/30/2002 6. Park Manor Demolition 7. Estudillo Mansion Grounds Master Plan Responsible Party/ Estimated Due Date Wager Pending submission from VEDC 04/26/02 COMPLETE Wager 04/04/2002- COMPLETE Hults/Lanier 10/25/01 11/15/01 COMPLETE Lavin 12/26/01 03/22//02 COMPLETE Hults 06/06/2002 COMPLETE Hults/Lanier 03/08/2002 COMPLETE Hults/Lanier Prepare draft outline of phases for grounds development October 18, 2001 COMPLETE 8. Urban Water Plan Lavin Work with Water Committee to select urban water plan consultant 10/15/2001 Complete development of an urban water plan. Draft Urban Water Management Plan to be distributed to Water Ad- 3/2002 Hoc Committee on 02/15/2002 Presentation by Stetson Engineering occurred on 4/4/2002 4/4/2002 COMPLETE 9. Lake Park Drive Block Wall Motlagh Design, bid, and construct block wall on Lake Park Drive by Soboba COMPLETE Springs Mobile Estates. C7 SUBJECT: CR&R Negotiations LOG NO.: 19 DATE: June 5, 2003 REQUESTED BY Council DESCRIPTION: ESTIMATED COMPLETION ASSIGNED TO DATE Cosentini 2004 Council Follow-up Page 1 05/28/2004 ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE Council established a Council Sub -Committee made out of Council Members Jim Conner and Ken Shaw and City Manager Cosentini to engage in contract negotiations with the City's Trash Hauler contractor CR&R to explore options. Some of the key issues are more community clean up and street bid system. ACTION/COMMENTS: Negotiations began July 15, 2003. Next meeting with Council Sub -Committee and staff scheduled for 9/23/2003 at 3:30 p.m. — on -going. SUBJECT: Council Goals LOG NO.: 59 DATE: August 7, 2003 ESTIMATED COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE Conner DESCRIPTION: Cosentini 2004 ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE Council Member Conner requested that during Council discussion of goals, staff start with the presentation of the former Council's goals, which included three different tiers. Meeting cancelled; staff to include Council's Goals in regular Council Meeting for discussion, as permitted. ACTION/COMMENTS: Meeting set for 02/28/2004. Meeting to be re -scheduled due to conflict with other city events on the 28th of February. Coming back at regular Council meeting. SUBJECT: Sale of City's Street Lighting System LOG NO.: 86 DATE: August 27, 2003 REQUESTED BY Council DESCRIPTION: ESTIMATED COMPLETION ASSIGNED TO DATE Lavin April 2004 ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE Staff to contact SCE to find out if this agency is still interested in purchasing the street lighting system from the City. Edison wants to wait until April 2004 to see if their finances can do the deal. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Administrative Policy — Press Relations LOG NO.: 88 DATE: August 16, 2003 REQUESTED BY Council DESCRIPTION: ESTIMATED COMPLETION ASSIGNED TO DATE Cosentini ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE Council requested that City Manager create an administrative policy on press relations. The components shall be as follows: 1) City Manager is to approve all formal written press releases; 2) Press inquiries on specific projects and topics of department heads is okay; 3) Department Heads should run input on negotiations by the manager; negotiations are usually handled by City Manager or the Chief Negotiator; and 4) Department Heads shall be the only ones within the department to speak to the press; line staff shall not be making representations for the department. ACTION/COMMENTS: 2 SUBJECT: Vosburg Litigation LOG NO.: 91 DATE: August 16, 2003 REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO Council Ballinger DESCRIPTION: Staff to gear up the Vosburg litigation and proceed. ACTION/COMMENTS: Pleadings in progress; January 16, 2004 — Hearing occurred. Judge gave owner 30-day to provide a plan and financing. ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE SUBJECT: Seventh Street Railroad Crossing LOG NO.: 98 DATE: September 4, 2003 REQUESTED BY Council DESCRIPTION: ESTIMATED COMPLETION ASSIGNED TO DATE Motlagh June 2004 ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE Staff was asked to add the Seventh Street Railroad Crossing to the City's 5-Year Capital Improvement Project, which will enable the City to process the crossing improvement request through Public Utilities Commission and Riverside County Transportation Commission. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Valley Economic Development Corporation LOG NO.: 100 DATE: September 4, 2003 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Hults/Cosentini 06/30/2004 05/21/2004 DESCRIPTION: Council approved giving Valley Economic Development Corporation $28,000 if the City receives a strategic plan for the valley that compliments our efforts of economic development. ACTION/COMMENTS: Report submitted. VEDC to send an invoice to the City for payment. SUBJECT: RDA Pass Thru Agreements Review LOG NO.: 107 DATE: September 19, 2003 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Manager Hults/Simon/Hughes June 2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff to review RDA Pass Thru Agreements for appropriate money allocation. ACTION/COMMENTS: 4 SUBJECT: Standards for dead ends on the cul-de-sacs LOG NO.: 113 DATE: September 18, 2003 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Hults 11/20/2003 DESCRIPTION: Staff to bring back the issue of standards for cul-de-sacs. This issue recently came up in relationship to a subdivision where it was apparent that there were no standards for cul-de-sacs. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Creation of Written Policy Governing Street Improvement Agreements in City's Right -of -Way LOG NO.: 138 DATE: October 9, 2003 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE City Manager Motlagh 01/01/2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff to bring back for Council's approval a policy governing agreements to defer public improvements. Staff should deal with placing some enforcement mechanisms in the policy for Council's consideration. ACTION/COMMENTS: Item is scheduled to be reviewed by Pre -Development Sub - Committee. 5 SUBJECT: Levee Alignment Option LOG NO.: 142 DATE: October 17, 2003 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council DESCRIPTION: Motlagh March 2004 Council approved a preferred levee alignment and directed staff to develop a strategy to move intendum with the levee approval that would move forward the issue of looking at a master plan for the levee in areas where a plan has not yet been developed; staff to work with other agencies and sub -committees to develop this strategy. Staff to bring back the issue if the master plan request is going to delay the project. It was staffs perception that it is not the Council's intent to hold the project for the master plan request. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Interim Park Fee Measures LOG NO.: 148 DATE: October 24, 2003 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council DESCRIPTION: Hults March 2004 Staff to bring forward some type of interim measure to assist our lack of park fee. This is a policy on definition of park that defines that drainage basins are not parks and there are such issues. Tim to provide a paragraph to be included in the park specifications stating that no park credit shall be given to developers for drainage basins. ACTION/COMMENTS: 6 SUBJECT: Joint Projects with Valley Wide Park & Recreation District LOG NO.: 149 DATE: November 6, 2003 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council DESCRIPTION: Staff March 2004 Staff to bring back a report that outlines potential cooperative efforts that the City can engage in with Valley Wide Parks and Recreations Districts, and the topics are: 1) Park Standards — currently being written by Bob and Tim; 2) Park Maintenance — Sam to give proposal if interested in providing maintenance service to the City; 3) Park planning has been contracted out 4) Identification of a 50 ac. Regional park site — 50 acre park identified and to be included in the general plan update; and 5) Park Master Plan may be done depending on Council direction on other issues to be presented. ACTION/COMMENTS: Meeting scheduled for December 9, 2003. Subsequent meeting(s) to be scheduled. SUBJECT: Druding Park LOG NO.: 153 DATE: November 6, 2003 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Mayor Ayres Unknown DESCRIPTION: Council renamed Druding Park to Veterans Park; within the motion was the Mayor's commitment to do fundraising to erect a monument in monument in memory of Mr. Dniding. ACTION/COMMENTS: 7 SUBJECT: The Oak Tree Controversy — Tract 31035 LOG NO.: 154 DATE: November 6, 2003 REQUESTED BY Council DESCRIPTION: ASSIGNED TO Hults ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE 05/06/2004 ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE A large oak tree was at issue in Tract 31035. Council directed staff to bring Valley Crest to evaluate the tree to see if the tree can be moved. If tree can successfully be moved, staff is to move it. If the tree cannot be removed, then an appropriate landscaping plan for oak replacement is to be provided as mitigation by developer. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Assembly of God Church Land Exchange LOG NO.: 156 DATE: November 6, 2003 ESTIMATED COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE Council DESCRIPTION: Hults ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE Staff to bring back a report exploring the potential alternatives for the sale of a City parcel located behind the Assembly of God Church; including the exchange of parcels with the Church. Staff also authorized the appraisal of the property in the process. ACTION/COMMENTS: 8 SUBJECT: Council Policy on Annexation for Property near the City within County Jurisdiction LOG NO.: 157 DATE: November 6, 2003 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council DESCRIPTION: Hults 05/06/2004 Staff to bring back an agreement with the county that would have the County to adhere to City Standards in developing outside but near the City. Staff to also take the policy position that we are to challenge development right outside the City in the County area that does not first annexes into the City. Staff is free to challenge within the CEQA process those developments that do not annex into the City first. This would give the city entitlement authority to ensure that the standards are implemented and that these developments are included in the City's CFD and LLPD's district. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Estudillo Mansion Volunteer Program LOG NO.: 168 DATE: December 4, 2003 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council DESCRIPTION: Tim Hults July 2004 Staff to develop a volunteer program to help open the Estudillo Mansion Park Site and Mansion. The direction of Council was to not open the site prematurely and to wait until the grounds are done and things are completed at the site to open the grounds to the public. ACTION/COMMENTS: 9 SUBJECT: Lyon Avenue Drainage Phasing Study LOG NO.: 172 DATE: December 18, 2003 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REOUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Motlagh 03/04/2004 05/21/2004 DESCRIPTION: Council directed staff to conduct a regional retention basin feasibility study to determine the appropriateness of Lyon Avenue property, to see if the Lyon Avenue is appropriate for a drainage basin. ACTION/COMMENTS: Completed — o.k. for basin. SUBJECT: Lyon Avenue Detention Basin Purchase Grading and Construction LOG NO.: 173 DATE: December 18, 2003 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council DESCRIPTION: Motlagh Council authorized, after the purchase of the property, the grading and construction of a retention basin to be funded through drainage mitigation fees. Council also authorized the use of the special district for the ongoing maintenance of this phase. Estimated cost $350,000.00. This would occur after Phase I and Phase II Environmental Studies on the property. This action would also follow the engineering stage to make sure that the 20 acres are suitable for a drainage basin. ACTION/COMMENTS: 10 SUBJECT: Lyon Avenue Financing of the Road. LOG NO.: 174 DATE: December 18, 2003 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Motlagh 05/20/2004 05/21/2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff was directed by Council to bring back a plan that would provide an alternative method of financing the realignment of Lyon Avenue and not use a CFD as recommended by staff. Council also put on hold the consideration of the construction of the park at this facility. The new financing option for the construction of Lyon avenue would include the possibilities of Measure "A," CDBG, RDA funding, development agreement fee money ($2.6 Million but only to issue a portion of theses funds), conditioning projects to make a contribution, traffic impact fee and signalization fees. Also to do a $20,000 study that would help show a nexus between the benefit zone to development and how much would be contributed and how big a zone o benefit is. Council directed staff to consider a park at a later date. ACTION/COMMENTS: Completed. SUBJECT: Moving the Museum to the Estudillo Mansion Site LOG NO.: 176 DATE: December 18, 2003 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council DESCRIPTION: Hults 02/02/2004 Staff to take to the Estudillo Mansion Committee and the Museum Association, the issue of placing the Museum at the Estudillo Mansion site and bring back a recommendation for Council's consideration. ACTION/COMMENTS: 1.1 SUBJECT: Standards for Utility Boxes LOG NO.: 180 DATE: December 18, 2003 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Motlagh/Hults 03/04/2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff to implement standards for utility boxes and the placement of underground utilities and out of the way. Staff would either look at standards or start requiring to be installed underground as conditions of approval or look at phasing these utilities underground as a requirement of the franchise agreement. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Contract with Sam Goepp LOG NO.: 183 DATE: December 18, 2003 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE City Manger Hults 02/05/2004 05/21/2004 DESCRIPTION: As a follow-up item to the Council direction to build a stronger relationship with Valley Wide Recreational District, staff is planning to bring forward a contract for services to employ Valley Wide and the services of Sam Goepp for our park planning. Tim Hults is to give Mr. Goepp a contract so we can engage this agency more formerly in this function. ACTION/COMMENTS: Tim has given Sam Goepp the contract for execution. If Sam Goepp is interested, he will contact the City. 12 SUBJECT: Park Standards/Park Maintenance Standards LOG NO.: 186 DATE: December 18, 2003 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Lavin 02/05/2004 DESCRIPTION: Bob Lavin to bring forward the park standards from Valley Wide and their Park Maintenance Standards for adoption by the City so we can take on their standards. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Water/Sewer Master Plan LOG NO.: 187 DATE: December 18, 2003 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Lavin 04/18/2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff to bring back in approximately 4-months a water master plan for Council's consideration. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Policies for Hwy. 79 intersections LOG NO.: 194 DATE: January 6, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Vice Mayor Buydos/ Tim Hults/Habib March 1, 2001 City Manager Cosentini Motlagh 02/05/2004 DESCRIPTION: After a discussion at the General Plan Sub -Committee meeting on January 5, 2004, with Vice Mayor Buydos, we came to the conclusion that it was in the City's best interest to identify the types of on ramps and interchanges that we are going to recommend to the agencies that are designing Hwy. 79. This will allow us to articulate standards, right-of-way, footage needs, and design that will affect development around these areas. We can accomplish this through a moratorium or establishing quickly the policies and procedures that will affect the interchanges and the on -ramps to Hwy 79. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Rancho San Jacinto Bond Improvements LOG NO.: 202 DATE: January 22, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Bob Lavin 03/22/2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff to bring back the plans and specifications for bid advertisement for the approved improvements for Rancho San Jacinto. ACTION/COMMENTS: Schedule being developed. 14 SUBJECT: Sewer Negotiations with EMWD LOG NO.: 204 DATE: January 22, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council City Manager/ April 2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff to bring back through the Council Water Sub -Committee a review of the negotiations and what input and direction of negotiations shall take. Recommendation shall come back to the Council. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: New Fire Station LOG NO.: 209 DATE: February 5, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Barron February 2005 DESCRIPTION: Council authorized staff to proceed with the purchase of the second site in the area of Sanderson and Cottonwood. Council also authorized staff to purchase all the sites, if and when those opportunities arise. ACTION/COMMENTS: t5 SUBJECT: Idyllwild Drive Right Turn Lanes LOG NO.: 210 DATE: February 5, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Motlagh DESCRIPTION: Council authorized staff to proceed with right -turn lanes only from Idyllwild Drive onto State Street going north and south direction. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Options Report for EMWD for Sewer Contract Negotiations LOG NO.: 216 DATE: February 5, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Water Sub -Committee Hargreaves March 2004 05/21/2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff to bring back to the Sub -Committee an options paper on the different options that the Sub- committee can recommend to the City Council in regards to the sewer negotiations with EMWD. These options would include, the City taking over future sewer collection lines. Recommendations from staff need to be more precise and to be approved through the entitlement process. ACTION/COMMENTS: Completed. 16 SUBJECT: P.A.L. Building LOG NO.: 219 DATE: February 19, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Hults August 2004 DESCRIPTION: Council authorized staff to put out a request for proposal for a stick and stucco structure in Sallee Park for the new P.A.L. building. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Museum Building LOG NO.: 222 DATE: February 19, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Hults 05/06/2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff to bring back a report that identifies where the museum can be built; staff is to check with Office of Historic Preservation to find out if the Council's desired site, which is the Estudillo Mansion site can be used in light of the City's recent grant and its limitations for use of the grounds. Staff shall also have a back up position and shall consult with the Museum Association if the feds do not allow the City to go on the Estudillo Mansion Grounds; Association is also to provide a recommendation to Council for an alternative site for the new museum building. Another City owned property site, like a park site comes to mind as a logical alternative. Museum Association available funding is $100,000, which may be sufficient to build the building, provided the City finds a City owned parcel where this building can be built. ACTION/COMMENTS: 17 SUBJECT: Skyview Park Drainage Project LOG NO.: 223 DATE: March 04, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Motlagh July 2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff to proceed with the $35,000 appropriation to install drainage improvements at Skyview Park that will take the street runoff (nuisance runoff) that is entering the park due to severing park during the park wall construction project. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Warwick Wall Project and Drainage LOG NO.: 225 DATE: March 04, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Motlagh May 2004 DESCRIPTION: Council through the Mid -Year budget adjustment process appropritated$10,000 for the Warwick Wall; City Engineer is to bring back a drainage plan for the wall for Council's review prior to moving forward with the project. ACTION/COMMENTS: 18 SUBJECT: Development Agreement Fee Road Projects LOG NO.: 226 DATE: March 04, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Motlagh DESCRIPTION: Council approved the use of development agreement fee money for the following projects: 1) $200,000 addition to the Measure "A" funds to the Main Street Pavement Rehabilitation so that the Soboba Road section can be completed; 2) $150,000 to the Kirby Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation , which is anticipated to be completed Fall 2004; 3) $150,000 for Esplanade Avenue project, which will be done in conjunction with the Main Street project, which will be advertise in April 2004; and 4) $200,000 for De Anza Drive Improvements. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: County Tax Collector Public Sales — Green Belts in Soboba and Peacock Well 28 Site LOG NO.: 227 DATE: March 04, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Manager Ballinger/Motlagh/ May 2004 Hults DESCRIPTION: There were four green belt areas in the Soboba Springs Village IV (Tract 21900), and one well site in Rancho San Jacinto that was not properly transferred (deeded) to the City. Consequently, County Tax Collector was to sell the property. Staff intervened in the process of acquiring all parcels back. ACTION/COMMENTS: Property off tax sale; tile needs to be cleared. 19 SUBJECT: Exterior Painting of Community Center LOG NO.: 229 DATE: March 04, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Manager/Mayor Lavin May 2005 DESCRIPTION: Staff to pursue the painting of the community center with redevelopment funds that can be transferred from the facade program. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Riverside County Sheriff's Contract — Law Enforcement Services LOG NO.: 230 DATE: March 18, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Cosentini 05/20/2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff to bring back the transition plan for implementing the Riverside County Sheriff's Department as the Law Enforcement Agency providing Police Services to the community. This would include the meet and confer process with the labor unions to deal transition issues. ACTION/COMMENTS: 20 SUBJECT: The Paul Garrett Deal LOG NO.: 232 DATE: April 1, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Cosentini/Hults April 2005 DESCRIPTION: Following the closed session, the City Council reported out into open session that they came into an agreement with Mr. Paul Garrett regarding his development agreement. Under the terms of this agreement, the City will collect $750,000 within ten days of Mr. Garrett receiving an executed copy of the contract and would pay another $750,000 after 500 units from his development had pulled building permits. This includes the 238 units that have been bought and are under construction by Western Pacific Housing. Staff is to track the units for Mr. Garrett's development so that when the 500 building permits have been pulled on his development, the City will bill him for another $750,000. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Dan Horn — 61 Unit Apartment Complex (Low Mod Housing) LOG NO.: 234 DATE: April 1, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Ballinger/Hults August 2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff to bring back low income housing project for Council's consideration after staff deals with the various conditions made by Vice Mayor Buydos. ACTION/COMMENTS: 21 SUBJECT: Lake Park Drive Well No. 4 LOG NO.: 235 DATE: April 1, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Motlagh August 2004 DESCRIPTION: Council awarded the Public Works Contract to Beylik Drilling, Inc. for the water well project. Habib will proceed to implement the project. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: $1.3 Million Paving Project LOG NO.: 236 DATE: April 1, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Motlagh September 2004 DESCRIPTION: Council approved the plan and specifications for the $1.2 Million Pavement Rehabilitation for Main Street, Esplanade Avenue, and Soboba Road. Habib to proceed as authorized. ACTION/COMMENTS: 22 SUBJECT: Mining Ordinance LOG NO.: 237 DATE: April 1, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Hults July 2004 DESCRIPTION: Council requested that further information come back to Council prior to approving the proposed City's Mining Ordinance. The information coming back will include hours of operation, no blasting, additional provisions for dust and street cleaning, and ensuring that the reclamation projects are implemented, as well as associated mitigation and security for the reclamation operations. It was also requested that a fee or tax be established for this type of operation. One of the options corning back is to do nothing (status quo). ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Hemet -Ryan Air Show Contribution LOG NO.: 238 DATE: April 1, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Williams 06/05/2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff to contact Hemet -Ryan Air Show organizer by April 15, 2004, to see if the City can obtain a booth at this event in return for the City's $1,500 contribution; if so, we are to staff a booth with at least with the City's Economic Development Specialist and Information Planner. Event is taking place on June 5, 2004. Contribution is contingent on the City's ability to set up a booth at this event. ACTION/COMMENTS: 23 SUBJECT: Temporary Use Permit for Used Lot Car Sales LOG NO.: 241 DATE: April 1, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Buydos/Conner Hults/Ballinger 06/03/2004 DESCRIPTION: Vice Mayor Buydos and Council Member Conner expressed concern about the temporary uses of car dealerships coming into town and setting up shop and parking lots over the weekend. They were sentiments on both sides of the issue. Staff to come back with the temporary use permit process or zoning ordinance so Council can have a discussion of the issue and provide staff direction for this type of uses. This should also include itinerary vendors like knife sharpeners and flower sales off the street. Staff to initiate some code enforcement after hours and/or weekends to deal with the itinerary vendors. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Housing Rehab LOG NO.: 243 DATE: April 15, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Hults Jun3 2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff to publish full page ads in the local newspapers (Spanish/English), as well as radio advertisement on housing rehabilitation program for the community. ACTION/COMMENTS: 24 SUBJECT: Complete Towing LOG NO.: 247 DATE: April 15, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Mayor Cosentini/Nichols August 2004 DESCRIPTION: Mark Henley of Complete Towing requested that his company be given the opportunity to be listed in the City's towing companies to provide services to the Police Department, provided he meets the City's requirements for this type of service. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Zoning Code Text Amendment LOG NO.: 252 DATE: April 15, 2004 REQUESTED BY Vice Mayor Buydos ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE John Brown July 2004 DESCRIPTION: John Brown to bring back a zoning ordinance amendment that will give Council the discretion to approve or disapprove tentative maps. ACTION/COMMENTS: 25 SUBJECT: The Trails Specific Plan LOG NO.: 257 DATE: April 15, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Hults September 2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff to bring back for Council's approval, if the unique lot in the subdivision does not conform to the zoning code. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Advertisement in Bus Shelter LOG NO.: 258 DATE: April 15, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Council Member Shaw/ August 2004 Staff DESCRIPTION: Council Member Shaw and staff are to look at various options for the running of the bus shelter advertisement. ACTION/COMMENTS: 26 SUBJECT: New Telephone System LOG NO.: 259 DATE: April 15, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Simon April 2005 DESCRIPTION: Staff to come back in one year to report the savings of a new system to the city. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: New Telephone System Protocol LOG NO.: 260 DATE: April 15, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Simon September 2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff is to ensure the new system have protocol that the callers have access to an operator, if they so wish to, at any time. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Commercial Property Development Joining the CFD LOG NO.: 261 DATE: April 15, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Hults October 2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff to bring back our CFD ordinance that requires commercial property to be included in the CFD. Council wants to make it easier on commercial property to join the CFD as discussed by staff at the meeting. Commercial property is to be annexed to the CFD by final occupancy, not prior to building permit as it is required of residential projects. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Downtown Parking LOG NO.: 262 DATE: April 15, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Staff July 2004 DESCRIPTION: Randy Williams to meet with Wayne Jewelers and the other downtown merchants to try to strike an understanding as to who will be utilizing the parking on Main Street and who shall park in the public parking lot south of Main Street between San Jacinto Avenue and Sheriff Avenue. ACTION/COMMENTS: 28 SUBJECT: BIA Funding for Fire Service LOG NO.: 263 DATE: April 15, 2004 REQUESTED BY Vice Mayor Buydos ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Cosentini/Ibarra August 2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff to check to see if BIA will pay the City for providing fire services. Vice Mayor Buydos stated that BIA currently pays the state for fire service to the reservation. The thought here is to have BIA reimburse the City for the fire services we provide. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: 4-Year Work Plan Accomplishments LOG NO.: 265 DATE: May 5, 2004 REQUESTED BY Vice Mayor Buydos ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE City Manager 05/30/2004 DESCRIPTION: Vice Mayor Buydos requested information regarding the last 4-years of positive resolutions that have been adopted; the good works that have been done by the various City Departments and the Council regarding one-time expenditures of money, such as the electric cars, and the general plan update; and a variety of other issues that might have been accomplished in the last four years. ACTION/COMMENTS: 29 SUBJECT: Cope Proclamation LOG NO.: 266 DATE: May 5, 2004 REQUESTED BY Vice Mayor Buydos ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE City Manager/ May 6, 2004 May 6, 2004 City Clerk DESCRIPTION: Vice Mayor requested a proclamation be prepared and presented to the Cope's at a future Council meeting recognizing the Cope's accomplishments recently celebrated in the Press Enterprise. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Complete Towing Application for City's Tow List LOG NO.: 267 DATE: May 17, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Mayor City Manager/ July 2004 05/14/2004 Chief of Police DESCRIPTION: The Mayor referred to staff the request from Complete Towing to be included in the City's tow list. Staff is to make the interested contractor aware of the requirements and process to be included in the City's tow list. ACTION/COMMENTS: 30 SUBJECT: League Vote on Ballot Measure LOG NO.: 268 DATE: May 6, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Cosentini/Williams 05/20/2004 05/21/2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff to attend the League of California Cities General Assembly meeting in Sacramento and consider the governor's proposal on our ballot measure. ACTION/COMMENTS: City representative attended the League's meeting and voted no. SUBJECT: Unitarian Church Waiver of CFD No. 2 Requirements LOG NO.: 269 DATE: May 6, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Ballinger/Staff May 20, 2004 05/21/2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff to review Unitarian Church's case requesting exemption of requirements to join the City's CFD No. 2 ACTION/COMMENTS: City Attorney stated church is exempt. SUBJECT: Form for proper placement on Agenda LOG NO.: 270 DATE: May 6, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Manager City Clerk August 2004 DESCRIPTION: Staff has had some problems with placing some items on the Council agenda properly; staff now will create a form that will accompany staff reports, so the Department Heads can clearly communicate with the city Clerk where on the agenda each item shall be placed. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: P.A.L. Building LOG NO.: 271 DATE: May 6, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Hults ASAP DESCRIPTION: Council directed staff to do whatever was necessary to complete the P.A.L. building, and not to bring back to Council for any further approvals. Council gave authority to do whatever design and product necessary to make it work within the allocated budget. ACTION/COMMENTS: 32 SUBJECT: Expansion of Virginia Lee — Modular Offices on Fifth Street LOG NO.: 272 DATE: May 6, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Council Hults/Lancaster July 2004 DESCRIPTION: Council approved $130,000 in general fund moneys and gave authority to place modular buildings behind Virginia Lee for staffing space needs. ACTION/COMMENTS: SUBJECT: Soboba Band of Luisefio Indians Meeting Request LOG NO.: 273 DATE: May 6, 2004 ESTIMATED ACTUAL COMPLETION COMPLETION REQUESTED BY ASSIGNED TO DATE DATE Mayor City Manager May 2004 DESCRIPTION: Council directed staff to put forward to the Tribe the proposed dates for a joint meeting, which are the next two regular Council meetings, starting at 7:00 p.m. This was in response to the Tribe's request to meet. ACTION/COMMENTS: 33 January 8, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Peter A. Consentini, City Manager SUBJECT: Input from Staff on Council Goals In my eight months with the City, I have had an opportunity to observe the operations to the point where I believe I have a fair view of the big picture. I would note that given our point in history that development related issues are probably the most time sensitive issues that need to be addressed by the City. Because of that, one of our most significant goals for the City of San Jacinto has already been accomplished. This is the CFD for the funding of police and fire personnel. Besides this important completed project, I believe the second most important time -sensitive development related project for the City to complete is the updating of the development impact fees. This project will capture the appropriate amount of money needed to update our infrastructure and public buildings to properly accommodate our build out. I am happy to report that this project in underway with the Council approving a contract for a consultant. In addition to this project, other time -sensitive development projects that we need to put in place as soon as possible are: general plan completion; development code and zoning revisions; master drainage plan. All these projects are time - sensitive in my mind, because the City has already annexed large amounts of property into the City limits, so these lands have a right to build now. These planning oriented projects are important goals because they will guide the development in a way the Council deems desirable for the community. The completion of the water and sewer master plans are also important projects. These documents will look at the long-term infrastructure needs of those systems and the replacement and maintenance of those city facilities. Another project of great importance is to bring the deficit positions of both water and sewer funds back to a balanced position. I believe these are critical issues related to both the water and sewer funds. Page 1 of 2 Memorandum DATE: December 22, 2003 TO: Peter Cosentini, City Manager FROM: Robert Lavin, Public Works Superintendent RE: Information Requested On Department Goals As you have requested, please see the list below for FY 2003/2004 department goals from Public Works: o Drilling of new well at Lake Park Bridge o Replacement of water lines at 6th and Mistletoe o Water and Sewer master plans o Landscape renovations of Rancho San Jacinto o Maintenance reduction of LLPD # 1 landscape and park sites o Establishing of landscape standard's o Uniform street name signs replacement program Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. AGENDA ITEM 14 June 3, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Peter A. Cosentini, City Manager SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2004-05 Budget RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council engage in a budget discussion for the next two regular meetings and take final action and approve the budget at the regular Council meeting of June 17, 2004. BACKGROUND: As the Council directed, we are trying to expedite the Council's budget consideration by having on this agenda the budget letter of transmittal for the FY 2004-05. We hope to walk into the City Council meeting of June 3, 2004 with the actual budget document. We are providing the Council with a narrative for your early review. Council has requested that private briefings by the staff of the budget between the regular meetings of June 3rd and 17th, which will be provided at Council's request. Hopefully, with this information and the budget document given to the Council on June 3rd, Council will be able to adopt the budget on June 17, after further review and discussion. JUSTIFICATION: Adopt the new Fiscal Year 2004-05 budget prior to beginning of the new fiscal year of July 1, 2004. BUDGETARY IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter of Transmittal - Budget Message Page 1 of 1 Appro City Manager: Finance Director: Budget Letter of Transmittal FY 2004-05 Budget Message As the City Manager of the City of San Jacinto it gives me great pleasure to present my second budget. Within this letter of transmittal, I will give you the substantive changes in the budget within the respective funds. General Fund I am very pleased to report to the Council that our budget strategy of last year has been very successful. As the Council will recall, we decided not to lay-off employees and cut services to the community. Instead we deficit spent to the tune of $1.3 Million, with the strategy that we would hold the line on the expenditures and allow revenues to catch up with our expenditures. $800,000 of our deficit spending of last year was expenditures exceeding revenues. Another $500,000 of our deficit spending was attributed to one-time moneys that will not re -occur. I am exceedingly pleased to report that in this fiscal year budget (04-05) , we have a balanced budget in regards to operational expenditures are met by on -going revenues. What this means is that revenues coming in are meeting our on -going operational expenses. We are not relying on any one-time moneys to balance this budget, as we did last year utilizing development agreement fee money. The bottom line in this good news is that we closed a $1.3 Million deficit spending gap in one fiscal year. I think this is a positive testimony to our strategy and hard work by Council and staff. Council showed enormous restrain and fiscal prudence last year. No one-time development agreement fee money is being used in our revenue picture to balance this Fiscal Year 2004-05 budget. The operational balance budget occurs after you pull out the one-time expenditures that represent one-time projects that would not necessarily re -occur next year, such as an updated general plan and/or updated development/zoning code. Overall in the general fund, we have revenues totaling approximately $11.4 Million, and expenditures to the tune of $13.5 Million. If you take the $2.2 Million of one-time expenses, you can see that we have a balance budget of $11.4 Million revenue and $11.3 Million of operational expenditures. In addition to this very strong showing of the general fund, we also end the FY 2004-05 with $3.4 Million reserve. All of our one-time development agreement money is being recommended for new asphalt and street repair projects, a small amount is in ending fund balance ($136,000.) Between Measure "A" and development agreement fee money, approximately $4 Million, is recommended for street repairs. We have created a separate reserve account so we can track separately the development agreement fee money. With this good financial news, I recommend that we lift our hiring freeze. New General Fund positions are as follows: 1) 2 Building Inspectors — Full -Time Temporary 2) 1 Maintenance Worker Full -Time Permanent Position Assigned to LLPD No. 2 (this was full-time temporary last year) 3) 1 Maintenance Worker Full -Time Temporary Position - Graffiti Removal (this is currently being contracted out) 4) Customer Service Representative in Finance going from part-time (20 hours/week) to full-time (36 hours/week, resulting in only $800 from the general fund annually) 5) 1 new accounting technician, funded 100% by special district money to assist with special district accounting 6) 1 new police officer, one-shirt/week City Clerk The City Clerk has a status quo budget, with the exception that we are budgeting for an election. Police As the Council will recall, the Sheriffs contract was approximately $3.9 Million. The Sheriffs has advised that the City has a 7% cost of living increase to their annual contract, which added approximately $173,000 to their contract. This increase applies only to the deputies' hourly rate and not to the other positions. The overall police budget for Fiscal Year 2004-05 is $4.6 Million, compared to approximately $4.3 Million in Fiscal Year 2003-2004. Using Community Facilities District moneys, we are adding $52,000 in this budget to fund one police officer/one shift per week, next year. Planning As the Council can imagine with our near record building boom, the planning department is expanding and has a variety of projects that reflect our rapid growth. Within the planning budget we have the following projects: o $75,000 - Hogle Ireland Consulting Services — Fast Tracking Project o $150,000 Tri Lake Consultants, Inc. o $200,000 Zoning and Development Code and Design Guidelines Project o $ 50,000 User Fee Study o $135,000 General Plan Update o $ 50,000 Commercial Master Plan (the other % of this project is in the RDA) o $140,000 Miscellaneous Case Planning for Large Specific Plans o $ 37,000 Wal-Mart EIR $837,000 2 The most noteworthy of the above -items is the $100,000 ($50,000 general fund, $50,000 RDA) project, which will be a commercial master plan at the intersection of Sanderson and Ramona Expressway. Of all the things we are doing, I cannot think of anything more important than to make sure that the commercial development in our City lands well. The intersection of Sanderson and Ramona Expressway is recommended by the Council's Development Sub -Committee to be zoned commercial for a future regional mall or regional shopping area. In light of the financial importance that this type of center would add to the City, staff believes that it is important that we master planned this area. The way the master plan is proposed to work, we would not hold up currently proposed commercial development at that intersection. However, the master plan will accelerate the arrival of commercial ventures that have not yet committed to this location. One of the single most important things that the City can do to secure its financial future is to zone an appropriate amount of commercial property so that we reserve it for future commercial development. Building Department The Building Department has approximately $130,000 for two new full-time temporary building inspectors. We already have 5 inspectors for this department. We have also added $150,000 for a building computer module which will help computerize the building function. In Capital machines and equipment, we have $15,000 for the annual GIS licensing and aerial photos. We also have a new computer and monitor and five new printers and a GIS software upgrade. Air Quality We have $13,000 allocated for the lease on our electrical vehicle and we have approximately $50,000 allocated for electric/gas hybrid vehicle for a new pool car. $6,000 of the $13,000 allocated lease payments for the existing two electric cars will be reimbursed to the City as part of the South Coast Air Quality Management Grant utilized for the lease of these two vehicles. Code Enforcement We have added a third Code Enforcement Officer funded with C.D.B.G. moneys. Estudillo Mansion We have $5,000 for ground maintenance. $35,000 has been allocated as the City's general fund grant match for an architectural design contract. We have a $246,000 federal grant in this budget and we are rolling over $180,000 grant from last Fiscal Year 2003-04. RDA The RDA continues to be challenged. We are emerging this year with the ability to pay all of our pass through agreements. As the Council will recall, we have done research on all past pass through agreements. We are concluding our research and we believe that we can bring them all current and pay the obligation in the future. The early indication, enables us to pay all of our pass through agreements, however, it does not leave much for operational needs of the RDA. We have included $6,000 for a marketing display, which will allow the City to make display presentations in a variety of forms, including at the State of the Valley. This is a nice pictorial display to promote the City. The facade program continues with $80,000 allocated for facade improvements. $20,000 is allocated for a state -mandated (AB 1290), RDA Implementation Plan update. Other expenditures in the RDA include $950 for the American Flag, $5,000 for a portable sound system, $750 for a digital camera, $1,500 for organizational team building, and $7,000 for advertisement. RDA Low Moderate Housing Program The RDA Low Moderate Housing Program will have $700,000 for our new housing rehabilitation program. We have $400,000 in other low -mod projects. Water Fund Water fund improves overall by dropping the deficit by about $90,000, by the end of the FY 2004-05. As the Council recalls, the water fund owes the general fund $1.4 Million for historic contributions by the general fund. Periodically, the general fund has paid for expenses for the water fund because the water fund did not have sufficient funding to cover expenses. The deficit was further refined this year from $1.4 to $1.7 Million because finance was including impact fee moneys in the operational funds, which shall be pulled out and separated. We are graduating a Maintenance Worker from Maintenance Worker I to Maintenance Worker II. The money necessary to do this is in the salary line items. Water currently does not have a master list of all users. We have allocated $30,000 ($15,000 in water and $15,000 in sewer) in this year's budget to create a master list, so we have a listing of all water and sewer users. We have allocated $50,000 for a variety of expenses that may come from our new Ground Water Management Plan that we are negotiation with other purveyors in the valley. $1,000 is allocated for organizational team building. Within the budget resolution, staff is acquiring authority to move the water loan from the general fund to other appropriate funds. This will take the loan out of our most sensitive fund (the general fund) and place it in less sensitive areas. 4 The water master plan is ongoing and will deal with a new rate structure to deal with the Ground Water Management Plan, capital improvements, capital replacement, operational expenses, and loan repayment. Finance Noteworthy in the finance department is a $40,000 computer module for purchasing. This request is rolled from last year, as a continuing project. All Purchase Orders are still being hand -typed, which needs to be brought into the 21st Century. Finance also has $20,000 in replacement computers. Our Customer Service Representative position is recommended to be made full-time from its part-time position. A new full-time temporary accounting technician to assist with special districts accounting is also recommended in this budget. Non -Departmental Noteworthy in non -departmental is the continuation of Joni Goodman's contract for Washington, D.C. lobbing representation. Joni replaced Mark Israel. $12,800 is recommended for continuing this contract. $1,500 is allocated for organizational team building. Our property and sales tax monitoring contract continues with HdL at $12,600. The Mickey Ibarra contract continues at a rate of $30,000. I would recommend to Council that we propose to Mr. Ibarra that we activate his contract for the Fiscal year 2004-05, when the Tribe files its trust application for the horse show property. Engineering In the engineering department $50,000 is allocated for the landscape architect to review plans and inspect construction on landscaping; developers will cover this cost. This is a new contract started in Fiscal Year 2003-04. Public Works plan check and inspections is up $150,000. This is a pass through type account. Measure "A" CIP The listing of street and road improvements is consistent with the priority the Council has placed on road improvements for the community. Asphalt improvements continue to be one of the major concerns in the community, and Council is responding appropriately. We have $1 Million loan to repave Main Street from Jordan to Ramona Expressway; $200,000 in Measure "A" funding for Soboba Road repairs; $292,989 for the Warren Road street improvements (a carry over project from prior years); $150,000 for Kirby Street Improvement; and $300,000 for Ramona Boulevard. In addition to these projects, we also have allocated $25,000 for the Evans Road improvements, $40,000 for miscellaneous traffic improvements and $10,000 for traffic studies, $20,000 for traffic signs, and $160,000 for Hyatt Elementary Sidewalk Improvements. We put $30,000 in Measure "A" funds for installation of speed humps. We have a fund balance in Measure "A" anticipated for the end of the Fiscal Year 2004-05, of $231,000. We also have in the Measure "A," an allocation in the amount of $250,000 for loan repayment, creating a loan reserve to pay back the $1 Million loan to the County. RCTC loan repayment is $146,000. Measure A Projects $300,000 $150,000 $160, 000 $ 40,000 $292,989 $ 30,000 $ 10,000 $ 20,000 $ 25,000 $1,000,000 $200,000 $2,175,989 Ramona Boulevard Pavement Rehabilitation Kirby Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Hyatt Elementary Neighborhoods Sidewalks Miscellaneous Traffic Control Devices & Improvements Miscellaneous pavement rehabilitation — Warren Road Speed humps and speed surveys Traffic studies Traffic signs Evans Road improvements adjacent to Tract 29992 Main St. Pavement Rehabilitation from Jordan to Ramona Exp. Soboba Road Improvements GRAND TOTAL Development Agreement Funds — Road Projects In addition to Measure "A" funds being allocated for road projects to the tune of almost $2 Million, Council has also directed an aggressive pavement rehabilitation project listing for development agreement fee money. Below is a listing of development agreement project moneys allocated for the upcoming fiscal year: $150,000 $150,000 $300,000 $ 40,000 $ 35,000 $300,000 $975,000 $100,000 $400,000 $564,000 $2,039,000 Esplanade Avenue in front of San Jacinto Post Office Kirby Street De Anza Drive Speed Bumps Idyllwild and State Street Intersection Improvements Lyon Avenue Realignment Sub -Total Dirt road improvements — paving Asphalt improvements in the older sections of town (Council and City Engineer to identify the streets to be completed with these funds) State Street GRAND TOTAL 6 Council directed the first five on the list to be done. Staff is recommending the last 3 projects to be added. If Council directs the development community to take the lead on the Lyon Avenue realignment, then, the $300,000 identified for Lyon Avenue realignment can be re -allocated to other projects. Flood Control We have allocated $350,000 for a drainage master plan, citywide. We have $100,000 for Line "E," and $500,000 for San Jacinto River Preliminary Engineering/Environmental documents, for the San Jacinto Levee Project, and $1.3 Million for the Lyon Avenue Basin property purchase. Traffic Signals We have allocated $260,000 to spend on the traffic signal budget. This includes $30,000 for Esplanade Street left turn, $5,000 for software for traffic counters/computer program, and $35,000 for fire department preemption system, $137,000 for traffic signal at Eagle and Ramona Expressway, $6,000 for warrant study at Eagle Drive and Ramona Expressway. Car Pool Mitigation We are allocating $215,000 for asphalt improvements and striping of Downtown Parking Lot south of Main Street, between San Jacinto and Sheriff Avenue. If the money stretches, we will also include lighting and landscaping. Sewer Fund We have allocated $25,000 for point repairs in the sewer system, including rehabilitation of manholes. We have $37,000 to purchase T.V. equipment to comply with on -going requirements of sewer maintenance. $25,000 is allocated for a new truck, and $50,000 for the first payment of a vector truck ($250,000), which will help in our maintenance function. $500 is allocated for organizational team building. $15,000 is included for the creation of a master user list. Due to a posting error, the sewer fund will receive moneys that were deposited in a different fund. This repayment will wipe out the sewer funds debt to the General Fund. This error will also have the sewer fund realize more annual revenue. The sewer fund anticipated revenue for Fiscal Year 2004-05 is $301,000 and anticipated expenditures are $385,745. Fund balance for sewer is estimated at $414,472 at the end of the 2004- 05 Fiscal Year. Streets signs. We have $10,000 in the street budget to continue replacement of street name 7 Especial Events: Special events are the same as last Fiscal Year 2003-04, with money allocated for 4th of July, Veterans Memorial, grand openings, and Tree Lighting Ceremony. Traffic Safety Fund: We have $18,000 allocated for traffic safety signs. Public Works Administration: We have two computer replacements in Public Works Administration. Parks: $30,000 has historically been allocated for contract graffiti removal. We believe we can do in-house graffiti removal, and have a more responsive service of graffiti abatement. With this appropriation, we would be hiring a full-time temporary position. When not doing graffiti, the person can help with park maintenance. Non -Departmental: We dropped the Sister City Membership last year. This is the second year the City is not renewing membership with our Sister City organization. Chamber dues and participation continue, including moneys allocated for the State of the Valley luncheon. $2,000 is allocated to continue to participate in the annual fireworks display for the 4th of July event organized by Valley Wide. The big difference in the non -departmental fund is that debt service is increasing by $700,000 due to the Rancho San Jacinto workout refinancing coming on line. Insurance dropped approximately by $150,000 due to contracting out for law enforcement services. We are allocating $50,000 for tree trimming. 8 LLPD No. 2 LLPD No. 2 budget is relatively new, with the Council approving an interim budget during Fiscal Year 2003-04. This budget represents the new annexations to the lighting and landscape park district No. 2, which is all the new housing coming on-line and paying for the maintenance of their facilities. We historically have received approval to hire a full-time temporary position to help with the maintenance of these new facilities within the new district. We have sufficient funds available now to make the full- time temporary position permanent. Total revenues and expenditures for this fund is $456,000. CFD for Police and Fire Our CFD fund is starting to collect funds for police and fire personnel. I am recommending that we allocate $52,000 for the addition of one police officer, one shift per week. I would recommend that the remainder of the CFD funds be reserved for the opening of our new fire station. I am currently in discussions with two property owners for the purchase of our new fire station site near the intersection of Sanderson and Cottonwood Avenue. At the end of the Fiscal Year 2004-05, we estimate collecting $800,000 in one-time and on -going revenue. ETER A. COSENTINI City Manager 9 6U June 03, 2004 TO: FROM: Bernie Simon '1 Finance Director SUBJECT: Approve Warrant Register for Warrants, Prepaid Checks, and Payroll Checks AGENDA ITEM 5.1.1 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council RECOMMENDATION: By motion, approve the warrant register for the warrants and prepaid items and payroll checks issued since the last Council meeting, for the period ending June 03, 2004 BACKGROUND: The following are the warrant and check numbers for this cycle: Warrant/Prepaid # s Cycle Dates Payroll Checks Cycle Date 67546-67639 June 03, 2004 16583-16609 June 03,2004 Payroll information is available for Council review in the Finance Department. JUSTIFICATION: All warrants, pre -paid checks and payroll checks require Council approval. BUDGETARY IMPACT: Adequate funds have been budgeted to cover the subject expenses. ATTACHMENTS: 1 — Detailed listing of invoices paid and warrant register. Approvals City Manager: Finance Director: i'l; Page 1 of 1 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date:03/20/03 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 67548 5/20/04 Ayres, jim REQUEST 5/19/04 Per diem for vegan conf 010-1100-411.31-20 129.00 129.00 67549 5/20/04 Best best & krieger Ilp 5/15/04 Professional services 096-1111-411.30-90 5,168.65 61,251.97 5/15/04 Professional services 050-1111-411.30-90 3,931.10 5/15/04 Professional services 010-1111-411.30-90 43,134.20 5/15/04 Professional services 065-0000-201.08-10 5,108.02 5/15/04 Professional services 026-7190-500.30-91 60.00 5/15/04 Professional services 026-7190-500.30-91 45.00 5/15/04 Professional services 026-7190-500.30-91 471.00 5/15/04 Professional services 026-7190-500.30-91 799.50 5/15/04 Professional services 026-7190-500.30-91 1,159.50 5/15/04 Professional services 102-1400-500.30-90 467.00 5/15/04 Professional services 200-8850-500.30-91 67.50 5/15/04 Professional services 200-8850-500.30-91 67.50 5/15/04 Professional services 200-8850-500.30-91 773.00 67550 5/20/04 Calpers REQUEST 5/14/04 Pers retir 5/13/04 type03 085-0000-202.21-28 22,575.64 22,575.64 67551 5/20/04 Enterprise rent -a -car REQUEST 5/19/04 Rental of vech forjim a. 010-1700-417.31-20 140.08 140.08 67552 5/20/04 Hartford life insurance companies REQUEST 5/14/04 Group # 109947 contrub 085-0000-202.21-29 3,851.38 3,851.38 67553 5/20/04 Icma retirement trust REQUEST 5/14/04 Deff comp contb 5/13/04 085-0000-202.21-29 740.38 740.38 67554 5/20/04 International council of shopping REQUEST 5/19/04 Memebership/registration 010-1700-417.31-20 520.00 1,040.00 REQUEST 5/19/04 Memebership/registration 010-1100-411.31-20 520.00 67555 5/20/04 Lincoln life REQUEST 5/17/04 Deff comp cont may 13,04 085-0000-202.21-29 335.00 335.00 67556 5/20/04 Pju telecomm REQUEST 5/17/04 50% deposit on proposal 010-2500-425.40-45 8,585.83 8,585.83 67557 5/20/04 Williams, randy REQUEST 5/19/04 Per diem for vegas conf 010-1700-417.31-20 229.00 229.00 67558 5/25/04 Alan richardson and west seegmill, PROPERTY DAMA, Settlement 020-2200-419.30-90 2,500.00 2,500.00 67559 5/26/04 U.s. postmaster REQUEST 5/26/04 Postage 2003 annual water 050-9000-450.21-10 895.45 895.45 67560 5/27/04 Riverside, county of REQUEST 5/14/04 Filing a notice 065-0000-201.08-83 1,314.00 1,314.00 67561 5/27/04 Riverside, county of BILLING 5/24/04 Police cad/rms 060-3100-431.40-45 3,850.00 72,513.78 BILLING 5/24/04 Police cad/rms 060-3100-431.40-45 3,725.00 BILLING 5/24/04 E-mail/back up technical 010-2500-425.34-05 31,635.00 Page 1 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date:03/20/03 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 67561... 5/27/04... Riverside, county of... BILLING 5/24/04 E-mail/back up technical 010-2500-425.34-20 33,303.78 72,513.78... 67564 6/3/04 Al's kubota tractor 168907 168889 Supplies Supplies 010-7100-410.21-80 010-7100-410.21-80 10.45 65.86 76.31 67565 6/3/04 Albert a. webb associates 04-1405 Professional services 039-4155-410.40-01 5,600.00 5,600.00 67566 6/3/04 Alert barricade, inc. 202-660 202-661 Supplies Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 055-4170-450.21-35 57.02 169.71 226.73 67567 6/3/04 American citi corp. 1032 1032 1032 March 2004 March 2004 March 2004 010-3100-431.33-50 010-3300-431.33-50 010-1400-414.33-50 13.85 5.95 3.95 23.75 67568 6/3/04 Andre landscaping service, inc. 19179 19204 19200 19203 Maintenance for may 2004 Maintenance for may 2004 Maintenance for may 2004 Maintenance for may 2004 010-7100-410.34-05 010-7100-410.34-05 301-8833-500.34-05 010-6500-425.34-05 25,971.32 480.00 2,300.00 500.00 29,251.32 67569 6/3/04 Aqua metric sales company 5661 Services rendered 050-9000-450.40-01 6,740.84 6,740.84 67570 6/3/04 At & t 4/22/04 6478 Telephone 010-2500-425.35-16 22.16 22.16 67571 6/3/04 B & w pipe & supply 64298 Supplies 010-7100-410.33-30 85.87 85.87 67572 6/3/04 Beylik drilling 17062 17062 Progress payment# 1 Progress payment # 1 052-9000-450.40-01 052-0000-210.20-25 63,503.00 -6,350.30 57,152.70 67573 6/3/04 C r & r incorporated 17534 5270 REQUEST 5/12/04 40yrd box and dump fees Sweeper waste Proceeds for trash/recly 029-8660-410.30-18 056-4150-410.35-18 059-8052-450.34-05 4,839.75 1,586.50 88,153.27 94,579.52 67574 6/3/04 C.a.c.e. california association of REQUEST 5/14/04 Membership dues 2004 010-3320-431.30-16 40.00 40.00 67575 6/3/04 California contractors supplies, 18727 Supplies 050-9000-450.21-35 215.96 215.96 67576 6/3/04 California overnight 4316151 4316151 4303623 4312093 Postage fees Postage fees Postage fees Postage 010-3300-431.21-10 010-1700-417.21-10 010-3300-431.21-10 010-1110-411.21-10 126.50 5.00 101.00 15.86 248.36 67577 6/3/04 Ced consolidated electrical 2983-426697 Supplies 025-7260-410.21-30 97.02 229.93 Page 2 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date:03/20/03 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 67577... 6/3/04... Ced consolidated electrical... 2983-427945 2983-426697 Supplies Supplies 010-7100-410.33-30 010-7100-410.33-30 35.89 97.02 229.93... 67578 6/3/04 Civic stone 2521 Professional services 099-1700-417.30-90 4,372.50 4,372.50 67579 6/3/04 Comserco 01/MA50211994 Maint billing 5/1-5/31/04 050-9000-450.34-05 86.10 86.10 67580 6/3/04 Consolitdated reprographics 500804 Supplies 010-4100-410.21-10 297.52 297.52 67581 6/3/04 Contreras construction co. REQUEST 4/28/04 REQUEST 4/28/04 Progress payment4 Progress payment 4 022-4150-410.40-01 022-4150-410.40-01 29,032.60 -2,903.26 26,129.34 67582 6/3/04 Cottonwood growers 1572 Supplies 010-7109-410.40-01 460.63 460.63 67583 6/3/04 Creative printing 4632 Office supplies 010-4100-410.21-10 27.31 27.31 67584 6/3/04 D.m.c. tree care 5/3/04 4/27/04 4/27/04 Services rendred Services rendred Services rendred 032-7150-410.40-01 032-7150-410.40-01 032-7150-410.40-01 7,500.00 525.00 300.00 8,325.00 67585 6/3/04 David evans and associates, inc. 18-146215 Servcies rendered 065-0000-201.08-83 314.12 314.12 67586 6/3/04 David taussig & associates, inc. 4040264 4040265 4040265 4040265 4040265 4040265 4040265 4040265 4040266 Professional services Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional services 033-8850-500.30-90 033-8850-500.30-90 033-8850-500.30-90 033-8850-500.30-90 033-8850-500.30-90 033-8850-500.30-90 033-8850-500.30-90 033-8850-500.30-90 102-1400-500.30-90 90.82 551.49 551.49 551.49 551.49 551.49 551.49 551.48 623.46 4,574.70 67587 6/3/04 Dewey pest control 1807867 1807865 Pest control Pest control 010-2500-425.34-05 010-2500-425.34-05 30.00 40.00 70.00 67588 6/3/04 E.s. babcock & sons, inc. AE40429-0278 AE40104-0278 AE40019-0278 AE40568-0278 Analysis Analysis Analysis Supplies 050-9000-450.30-90 050-9000-450.30-90 050-9000-450.30-90 050-9000-450.30-90 20.00 130.00 48.00 60.00 258.00 67589 6/3/04 Eastern municipal water district 5/10/04 6271802 Utilities 025-7100-410.35-10 27.25 1,408.05 Page 3 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date:03/20/03 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 67589... 6/3/04... Eastern municipal water district... 5/7/04 4379602 5/7/0415886502 5/7/04 9539902 5/12/414904201 5/10/4 8137703 5/11/4 9079501 5/10/4 8500101 5/10/4 9199801 Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7251-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7100-410.35-10 47.27 21.08 29.81 13.22 1,074.64 98.89 18.58 77.31 1,408.05... 67590 6/3/04 Elite fire protection 22203 Supplies 096-1700-417.33-10 58.00 58.00 67591 6/3/04 Ewing 4360002 Supplies 010-7100-410.21-35 231.64 231.64 67592 6/3/04 Family sport & fitness 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 121 April 2004 April2004 April2004 April2004 April2004 April2004 April 2004 April 2004 April 2004 April 2004 April 2004 April2004 April 2004 010-1110-411.11-10 010-1200-412.11-10 010-1400-414.11-10 010-1700-417.11-10 010-3100-431.11-10 010-3300-431.11-10 010-4150-410.11-10 010-4200-410.11-10 010-7100-410.11-10 010-7400-425.11-10 085-0000-202.21-76 096-1700-417.11-10 099-1700-417.11-10 20.00 20.00 70.00 20.00 400.00 30.00 150.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 800.00 67593 6/3/04 Federal express 1-731-76665 1-731-76665 1-731-76665 Postage Postage Postage 010-4100-410.21-10 010-1700-417.21-10 010-3100-431.21-10 29.43 13.97 16.70 60.10 67594 6/3/04 First american real estate 10937158 Professional services 010-3300-431.34-05 4,542.00 4,542.00 67595 6/3/04 Genesis construction REQUEST 4/26/04 REQUEST 4/26/04 Progress payment 1 Progress payment 1 052-9000-450.40-01 052-0000-210.20-25 48,750.00 -4,875.00 43,875.00 Page 4 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date:03/20/03 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 67596 6/3/04 Granger's plumbing 775 Services rendered 010-7400-425.33-10 51.50 51.50 67597 6/3/04 Hdl software, Ile 9116 9443 Professional services Professional servcies 010-2500-425.30-90 010-2500-425.30-90 2,700.00 300.00 3,000.00 67598 6/3/04 Hemet industrial supply 23912 Supplies 050-9000-450.33-10 17.11 17.11 67599 6/3/04 Home depot credit services 3118393 Supplies 010-3300-431.21-10 29.72 29.72 67600 6/3/04 Horizon water 5/20 CITY HALL Supplies 010-2500-425.21-10 109.60 109.60 67601 6/3/04 Hughes supply company, ca Ilc, S1229264.001 Supplies 050-9000-450.21-80 380.28 380.28 67602 6/3/04 I.b. reprographics 44837 Supplies 010-4100-410.21-10 46.65 46.65 67603 6/3/04 Information resources 37794 Professional services 010-1210-412.30-90 200.00 200.00 67604 6/3/04 Inland foundation eng. inc. 8367 8368 8369 8239 Services rendred Services rendred Services rendred Professional servcies 054-9000-450.40-01 052-9000-450.40-01 054-9000-450.40-01 054-9000-450.40-01 197.00 1,625.00 480.00 4,930.00 7,232.00 67605 6/3/04 Inland water works supply co. 138116 Supplies 050-9000-450.33-30 124.45 124.45 67606 6/3/04 J & j automotive 18913 Auto repair 010-4200-410.33-50 19.12 19.12 67607 6/3/04 James aronson 101 Services rendred 022-4150-410.40-01 665.00 665.00 67608 6/3/04 Kammeyer & associates inc. 6268 Professional servcies 022-4150-410.40-01 533.00 533.00 67609 6/3/04 La chemcial 282558 283577 Supplies Supplies 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 2,361.20 1,339.66 3,700.86 67610 6/3/04 Lancaster inspection services 04-10 Building inspeciton 010-3300-431.10-04 2,926.00 2,926.00 67611 6/3/04 Lor geotechnical group, inc. 7852 Professional servcies 039-4155-410.40-01 2,600.00 2,600.00 67612 6/3/04 Los angeles engineering, inc. REQUEST 5/13/04 REQUEST 5/13/04 Progress payment # 5 Progress payment # 5 022-4150-410.40-01 022-0000-210.20-25 12,251.13 -1,225.11 11,026.02 67613 6/3/04 Matt chlor inc. 30928 Supplies 050-9000-450.33-30 1,055.36 1,055.36 67614 6/3/04 Micro mobile 9833 10022 Servcies rendered Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 056-4150-410.33-50 100.00 81.47 181.47 67615 6/3/04 Mission uniform services, inc. 17997208 17997201 Services rendered Uniform supplies 010-7400-425.34-05 050-9000-450.21-35 29.13 6.07 571.96 Page 5 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date:03/20/03 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 67615... 6/3/04... Mission uniform services, inc.... 17997200 17997200 S 66153 17997204 17997203 17996196 17998218 17998215 17998214 17998214 17900027 17900027 17900031 17998217 17990028 17990030 17996196 Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies 055-4170-450.21-35 050-9000-450.21-35 050-9000-450.21-35 010-4150-410.21-35 010-7100-410.21-35 055-4170-450.21-35 010-4150-410.21-35 055-4170-450.21-35 055-4170-450.21-35 050-9000-450.21-35 055-4170-450.21-35 050-9000-450.21-35 010-4150-410.21-35 010-7100-410.21-35 010-7100-410.21-35 010-7100-410.21-35 050-9000-450.21-35 12.76 51.84 44.01 49.09 24.57 12.76 50.32 6.07 12.76 51.84 12.76 51.84 49.09 24.57 6.07 24.57 51.84 571.96... 67617 6/3/04 Overnight industrial 23415 23485 23483 23483 23483 Supplies Supplies Supplies Supplies Supplies 010-7100-410.33-10 010-7100-410.33-10 050-9000-450.33-10 010-7100-410.21-35 010-4150-410.21-35 257.98 53.27 114.03 110.00 110.00 645.28 67618 6/3/04 Pierce plumbing 30659 30699 Supplies Supplies 050-9000-450.21-80 010-7100-410.33-10 102.09 108.01 210.10 67619 6/3/04 Pip printing 69751 69751 67473 68988 Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies 033-8850-500.21-10 102-1400-500.21-10 010-1110-411.21-10 010-1110-411.21-10 0.54 0.54 241.26 95.87 338.21 67620 6/3/04 Platinium plus for business STMT MAY 2004 Annual fee 010-2500-425.31-25 25.00 25.00 Page 6 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date:03/20/03 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 67621 6/3/04 Press enterprise 2258246 2253591 2247529 2255270 2257438 2261774 2279702 Advertisment Advertisment Advertistment Advertisment Advertisment Advertisment Advertisment 102-1400-500.36-10 010-1110-411.36-25 010-1700-417.36-25 010-1700-417.36-25 010-1700-417.36-25 033-8850-500.30-91 102-1400-500.36-25 246.20 308.35 117.70 129.80 119.15 122.10 455.40 1,498.70 67622 6/3/04 Quality auto parts D679547 D679311 D679145 Supplies Supplies Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 010-4150-410.33-50 010-4150-410.33-50 70.96 2.26 5.98 79.20 67623 6/3/04 Rebel equipment rentals 19-004742-04 Equipment rental 010-4150-410.33-30 213.63 213.63 67624 6/3/04 Reliable SBD58900 DF440900 SCQ09600 ZF464500 Office supplies Office supplies Offcie supplies Office supplies 010-2500-425.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 010-4100-410.21-10 010-4150-410.21-10 119.58 399.83 40.17 42.00 601.58 67625 6/3/04 Riverside, county of REQUEST 5/12/04 March 2004 010-0000-304.03-35 116.00 116.00 67626 6/3/04 Riverside, county of 3884 3928 Supplies Office supplies 010-1700-417.21-10 010-1700-417.21-10 105.73 30.00 135.73 67627 6/3/04 Riverside, coutny of health 1ST QRT 2004 1st qrt. 04 vector contro 010-2500-425.34-05 262.70 262.70 67628 6/3/04 Rk engineering group, inc. 2004-271 Professional servcies 022-4150-410.40-01 26.25 26.25 67629 6/3/04 Rosenow spevacek group inc. 14415 Professional servcies 099-1700-417.30-90 6,242.50 6,242.50 67630 6/3/04 South kern machinery 600056 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 54.97 54.97 67631 6/3/04 Texaco fleet management STMT 5/2/04 STMT 5/2/04 STMT 5/2/04 STMT 5/2/04 Diesel Diesel Diesel Diesel 010-4150-410.21-70 056-4150-410.33-50 050-9000-450.21-70 055-4170-450.21-70 704.80 534.73 80.69 29.62 1,349.84 67632 6/3/04 Traffic control service 243958 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-30 682.66 682.66 67633 6/3/04 Tri-lake consultants, inc. 2078 2078 Professional services Professional services 021-4150-410.30-90 010-4150-410.30-90 5,342.50 6,089.45 66,017.13 Page 7 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date:03/20/03 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 67633... 6/3/04... Tri-lake consultants, inc.... 2093 2084 2083 2079 2079 2079 2079 2092 2091 2090 2089 2088 2087 2085 2082 2081 2080 Professional services Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies Professional servcies 065-0000-201.06-45 029-8662-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 010-0000-308.06-09 010-1700-417.30-90 065-0000-201.08-83 065-0000-201.08-83 052-9000-450.40-01 022-4150-410.40-01 052-9000-450.40-01 022-4150-410.40-01 022-4150-410.40-01 052-9000-450.40-01 039-4155-410.40-01 054-9000-450.40-01 054-9000-450.40-01 022-4150-410.40-01 582.68 7,711.58 2,992.50 2,280.00 680.00 3,860.00 100.00 855.00 405.00 475.00 1,660.00 12,870.64 3,056.72 1,540.00 1,657.86 13,660.00 198.20 66,017.13... 67635 6/3/04 Utah pacific construction company REQUEST 5/18/04 REQUEST 5/18/04 Progress billing #3 Progress billing #3 054-9000-450.40-01 054-0000-210.20-25 250,794.48 -12,539.72 238,254.76 67636 6/3/04 Valley wide recreation 1145 1138 1140 Grafitti removal Grafitti removal Grafitti removal 025-7250-410.34-05 025-7250-410.34-05 025-7250-410.34-05 1,198.30 1,312.54 950.66 3,461.50 67637 6/3/04 Vulcan materials company 241828 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-30 255.27 255.27 67638 6/3/04 Western farm service 57578 Supplies 010-4150-410.21-14 900.25 900.25 67639 6/3/04 Xerox corporation 2441423 2441427 2633448 2633426 2633451 Lease on copier Lease on copier Lease on copier Lease on copier Lease on copier 010-3100-431.34-05 010-1700-417.34-05 010-7400-425.34-05 010-2500-425.34-05 010-2500-425.34-05 838.08 409.13 174.56 1,366.21 737.96 3,525.94 Page 8 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date:03/20/03 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total Total Checks 825,852.27 Page 9 AGENDA ITEM f5 / June 2, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Bernie Simon, Finance Director Jack Templeton, Accountant SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report at April 30, 2004 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File Treasurer's Report for April 30, 2004. BACKGROUND: Total Cash and City Investments increased 1.15% during the month. This includes cash, cash in bank and cash with trustee. At April 30, 2004, $561,835 remains from the original $1.3 Million Loan from RCTC in 1998. Some of the large expenditures during the month included items such as $433,647 to CR&R for Trash Services for October 2003 to February 2004, $215,703 to Riverside County for Fire Services, $113,060 to Utah Pacific Construction for West Side Water Improvements, $112,353 to Tri-Lakes Consultants for professional services, $109,488 to Contreras Construction for 1st and 7th Sidewalk Improvements, $96,635 to Riverside Auditor/Controller for 2003-2004 Education Revenue Augmentation Fund, $59,704 to Best, Best & Krieger for Legal Fees and $48,925 to Genesis Construction for De Anza Lift Station And Water Main Project. Disbursements were made from trustee funds relating to principal and interest debt service requirements for 1997 Water Improvement Bonds of $97,571 and for 2002 Water Revenue Bonds of $214,159. The Treasurers' report is a "snapshot" report of our cash position on the last day of the month in all of our accounts. Page 1 of 1 A City Manager Finance Director: Page 1 INVESTMENT TYPE INSTITUTION SERIAL # CITY OF SAN JACINTO TREASURERS REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDING APRIL 30, 2004 INTEREST PURCHASE RATE YIELD DATE MATURITY DATE 03/31/04 PREV. MONTH BALANCE 04/30/04 CURRENT BALANCE % change from prior month 04/30/04 COMPUTED MARKET ACCRUED VALUE INTEREST STATE POOL Money Market DEMAND Account PAYROLL Account IMPREST Account L.A.I.F. Bank of Hemet Bank of Hemet Bank of Hemet Bank of Hemet Cash on Hand 1.445% 1.240% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 1.445 % 1.240% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL CITY INVESTMENTS & FUNDS RESTRICTED CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT (BOND FUNDS) CFD NO 2 Mutual Fund Mutual Fund Mutual Fund Corporate Obligations Mutual Fund Mutual Fund Mutual Fund Mutual Fund Tn ta% Union Bnk Union Bnk Union Bnk Union Bnk Union Bnk Union Bnk Union Bnk Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Bayerische Lankbk GIC Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Blkrock Prov. T-Fund TOTAL CFD NO 2 CFD NO 2002-1 Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund TOTAL CFD NO 2 REFINANCE 1993 RDA SAN JACINTO TAX ALLOCATION BONDS Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund 6711695201 0.800% 0.800% 6711695202 0.800% 0.800% 6711695204 0.800% 0.800% 6711695204 4.050% 4.050% 6711695205 0.800% 0.800% 6711695208 0.800% 0.800% 6711695301 0.800% 0.800% 6711695501 0.800% 0.800% Various 11/01/01 Various Various Various • Various Various Various Various 10/10/02 Various Various Various Various 6711595206 0.800% 0.800% Various 7-15639 0.80096 0.800% Various ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 94-1 Money Market Union Bnk Alamo Capital 578544857 0.400% 0.400% Various Cash Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund 7-15777 0.800% 0.800% Various TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 94-1 1997 WATER IMPROVFMFNT REVENUE BONDS Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Pray. T-Fund 7-15980 0.800% 0.800% Various Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund 7-15980-06 0.800% 0.800% Various TOTAL 1997 WATER IMPROV. 2002 WATER REVENUE BONDS Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund 6-711682901 Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund 6-711682902 Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund 6-711682903 TOTAL 2002 WATER REVENUE BONDS 1999 RDA SOBOBA TAX ALLOCATION BONDS Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund 0.800% 0.800% 0.800% 0.800% 0.800% 0.800% Various Various Various 7-16274 0.800% 0.800% Various Open Open Open Open Open n/a Open Open Open 09/01/14 Open Open Open 0 pen Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open 815,218,203 $1,534,973 $642,261 $112,848 81,365 8600 816,021,423 $1,336,313 $694,186 422,070 $1,365 8600 5.28% -12.94% 8.08% -80.44% 0.00% 0.00% $16,040,214 $1,336,313 $594,186 822,070 $1,365 $600 $18,791 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 817,510,250 818,075,957 3.23% 918,094,748 $18,791 8146 80 $15,004 $748,800 $40,060 816 $288,582 $26,077 $280 80 $15,012 $748,800 $40,070 $16 $288,607 $26,091 91.78% 0.00% 0.05% 0.00% 0.02 % 0.00% 0.01 % 0.05% $1,118,685 $1,118,876 0.02% $828,758 $828,758 $829,186 0.05% $829,186 0.06% $280 40 $15,012 $748,800 $40,070 $16 8288,607 $26,091 $1,118,876 $829,186 $829,186 nla nla n/a n/a nla n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $334,256 $334,429 0.05% $334,429 n/a $30,217 40 $30,217 $30,227 0.03% 80 0.00% $30,227 0.03% $30,227 80 $30,227 n/a n/a n/a $1,451,034 41,354,195 -6.67% $204,545 $204,651 0.05% $1,354,195 $204,651 $1,655,579 $1,558,846 -5.84% S0 $54,159 0160,000 $214,159 $88,157 875 80 SO 875 100.00% -100.00% -100.00% -99.96% 488,203 0.05% 81,558,846 875 SO SO 875 $88,203 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Page 2 CITY OF SAN JACINTO TREASURERS REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDING APRIL 30, 2004 03/31/04 04/30/04 % change 04/30/04 COMPUTED INVESTMENT INSTITUTION INTEREST PURCHASE MATURITY PREY. MONTH CURRENT from prior MARKET ACCRUED TYPE SERIAL # RATE YIELD DATE DATE BALANCE BALANCE month VALUE INTEREST RCTC I OAN Money Market USB US Bank TOTAL CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT TOTAL ALL FUNDS 96-444672 0.470% 0.470% Various Open $561,617 *561,836 0.04% I CERTIFY THAT THESE INVESTMENTS COMPLY WITH ALL STATE LAWS PERTAINING TO THE INVESTMENT OF LOCAL AGENCY FUNDS AND THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO'S INVESTMENT POLICIES. CITY OF SAN JACINTO MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SIX MONTH CASH FLOW REOUIREMENTS AS PER GOVERNMENT CODE 536461h)131. G) JAMES W. POTTS, TREASURER City Of San Jacinto $561,835 n/a $4,831,428 $4,521.677 -6.41% $4,521,677 n/a $22,341.678 422,597,634 1.15% $22,616,425 $18,791 AGENDA ITEM 50 /o,3 June 3, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Bernie Simon, Finance Director SUBJECT: CFD #2 Special Tax A -Annual Levy Ordinance — 2nd Reading RECOMMENDATION: By motion approve introduction and the first reading of Ordinance No. 04-13, and by further motion waive its full reading and read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City Of San Jacinto, California, acting as the Legislative Body of Community Facilities District No. 2 authorizing the Levy of a special tax within Community Facilities District No. 2 BACKGROUND: Staff is requesting Council to approve and introduce an ordinance to levy special taxes in CFD No. 2. CFD No. 2 levies a special tax, with certain exceptions as identified in the RMA, on all residential, commercial and retail property developed in Rancho San Jacinto since the adoption of Resolutions 1780, 1781, 1782 and 1783 in 1989. Subsequent resolutions were then adopted to issue bonds secured by special taxes to pay for certain facilities in the Community Facilities District. CFD No. 2 issued $26 Million in CFD bonds to finance back bone infrastructure improvements in the Rancho San Jacinto master planned community. CFD No. 2 defaulted on its bond obligations in 1997 due to the volume of tax defaults of vacant developer owned parcels. In October 2002, 114 delinquent parcels were detached and were formed into CFD 2002-1 (Elliott/Tower/Garrett properties) and $9,360,000 of the remaining debt associated with the 900 developed parcels (Including approx 10 undeveloped parcels) was refinanced to insure a lower annual increase, to get the bonds back on a maturity date target of 2014 and remove the debt of the tax defaulted properties. CFD No. 2 represents two parts: Special Tax B - Public Safety Tax (which was eliminated as a part of the bond workout refinancing in October 2002); Special Tax A is payable annually until the CFD bonds are repaid in approximately 2014, and represents approximately 900 units. In order to assess properties for FY 2004-05, all calculations, determinations, reports, resolutions would have to be done, approved and remitted to the Auditor Controller by August 10th The ordinance would eliminate annual levy resolutions for CFD No. 2 and streamline the annual processing of the levy approval. Generally, the annual levy resolutions are ministerial in nature and are unnecessary because the district is required to levy the properties and calculate the special taxes in accordance with the RMA adopted as part of the formation of the district. There would be timesavings by not doing the annual resolutions. JUSTIFICATION: An adopted ordinance would dispense with the annual resolution to approve the levy of properties in CFD No. 2. The District is already obligated to levy properties in CFD No. 2 for the benefit of the property owners as outlined in the Rate and Method of Apportionment (RMA) to repay the bond debt. This would assist in streamlining the levy process in the very narrow window of time to calculate the levy and developing the reports and electronic files necessary for inclusion on the County of Riverside Secured Property Tax Roll. BUDGETARY IMPACT No budgetary impact. City would save some undeterminable amount of Staff, Consultant and Attorney costs by not doing an annual staff report and resolution to levy properties in CFD No. 2. ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance No. 04-13 Page 2 of 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO) ORDINANCE NO. 04-13 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 WHEREAS, on January 3, 1989, this City Council adopted a resolution entitled "Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Declaring and Establishing the Formation of a Community Facilities District, and Authorizing the Submittal of Levy of Special Taxes to the Qualified Electors, (the "Resolution of Formation") which established City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2 (the "District") pursuant to Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5, commencing with Section 53311, of the California Government Code (the "Act"), to finance certain facilities described in the Resolution of Formation (the "Facilities"); and WHEREAS, notice was published as required by the Act relative to the intention of this City Council to form the District and to provide for the Facilities; and WHEREAS, this City Council has held a noticed public hearing as required by the Act relative to the determination to proceed with the formation of the District and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the District to finance a portion of the costs of the Facilities; and WHEREAS, at said hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District and the levy of said special taxes were heard, substantial evidence was presented and considered by this City Council and a full and fair hearing was held; and WHEREAS, subsequent to said hearing, this City Council adopted a resolution entitled "Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto Calling a Special Election and Submitting to the Voters of City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2 a Proposition with Respect to the Annual Levy of Special Taxes Within the Community Facilities District to Pay Principal of and Interest on Bonds Thereof, and a Proposition with Respect to the Establishment of an Appropriations Limit for the Community Facilities District" which resolution established the District, authorized the levy of a special tax within the District, and called an election within the District on the proposition of incurring indebtedness, levying a special tax, and establishing an appropriations limit within the District, respectively; and Page 1 of 4 WHEREAS, an election was held within the District in which eligible landowner electors approved said propositions by more than the two-thirds vote required by the Act. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. By the passage of this Ordinance, this City Council hereby authorizes and levies special taxes within the District pursuant to the California Government Code Sections 53328 and 53340, at the rates and in accordance with the method of apportionment set forth in Exhibit A to the Resolution of Formation (the "Rate and Method of Apportionment"). The special taxes are hereby levied commencing in fiscal year 2004-05 and, in each fiscal year thereafter, until payment in full of any bonds of the City issued for the District (the "Bonds"), payment of all costs of the Facilities to be paid with such funds, and payment of all costs administering the District. Section 2. The City Treasurer or his/her designee is hereby authorized and directed each fiscal year to determine the specific special tax rate and amount to be levied for the next ensuing fiscal year for each parcel of real property, within the District, in the manner and as provided in the Rate and Method of Apportionment. Section 3. Properties or entities of the State, federal or local governments shall be exempt from any levy of the special taxes, to the extent set forth in the Rate and Method of Apportionment. In no event shall the special taxes be levied on any parcel within the District in excess of the maximum tax specified in the Rate and Method of Apportionment. Section 4. All of the collections of the special tax shall be used as provided for in the Act, the Municipal Code, the Rate and Method of Apportionment, and in the Resolution of Formation including, but not limited to, the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, the replenishment of the reserve fund for the Bonds, the payment of the costs of the Facilities, the payment of the costs of the City in administering the District and the costs of collecting and administering the special tax. Section 5. The special taxes shall be collected from time to time as necessary to meet the financial obligations of the District on the secured real property tax roll in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem taxes are collected. The City Treasurer or his/her designee, pursuant to the Rate & Method of Apportionment, is hereby authorized and directed to provide all necessary information to the auditor/tax collector of the County of Riverside and to otherwise take all actions necessary in order to effect proper billing and collection of the special tax, so that the special tax shall be levied and collected in sufficient amounts and at the times necessary to satisfy the Page 2 of 4 financial obligations of the District in each fiscal year until the Bonds are paid in full and provision has been made for payment of all of the administrative costs of the District. Notwithstanding the foregoing and notwithstanding the Rate & Method of Apportionment, the City Treasurer or his/her designee may collect one or more installments of the special taxes by means of direct billing by the City of the property owners within the District, if, in the judgment of the City Treasurer or his/her designee, such means of collection will reduce the administrative burden on the City or is otherwise appropriate under the circumstances. In such event, the special taxes shall become delinquent if not paid when due as set forth in any such respective billing to the property owners. The special taxes shall have the same lien priority, and be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in cases of delinquency as provided for ad valorem taxes. In addition, the provisions of Section 53356.1 of the Act shall apply to delinquent special tax payments. Section 6. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the special tax is found inapplicable to any particular parcel within the District, by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this ordinance and the application of the special tax to the remaining parcels within the District shall not be affected. Section 7. This Ordinance shall be published and posted in the manner specified in the California Government Code, and shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. This ordinance shall be subject to referendum pursuant to the laws of the State of Califomia. Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 20th day of May, 2004: APPROVED, PASSED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 3rd day of June, 2004 by the following vote: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Abstain: City of San Jacinto by Jim Ayres, Mayor Page 3 of 4 ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attomey Best Best & Krieger LLP Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2] 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 RESOLUTION NO. 1782 RESOLUTION OF TUE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND TO LEVY A SPECIAL TAX TO PAY FOR CERTAIN PUDLIC FACILITIES WITHIN SAID COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT THIS RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED WITH REFERENCE TO THE FOLLOWING FACTS: WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), at this time is desirous to initiate proceeding° to create a Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act"). This Community Facilities District shall hereinafter be referred to as COHHU- NITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and, WHEREAS, this legislative body is now required to proceed to adopt its Resolution of Intention to initiate proceedings for the establishment of said District, to set forth the boundaries for said District, indicate the type of public facilities and services to be provided, indicate the rate and apportionment of a special tax sufficient to pay for all such facilities and services, set a time and place for a public hearing relating to the establishment of said District, and describe the proposed voting procedure for any election pertaining to the levy of a special tax or issuance bonds within the District; and, WHEREAS, at any time before or after the formation of the District, this legislative body may accept advances of funds and/or work in kind from any source; however, no reimbursement and/or repayment shall be made for said advances until expressly set forth by agreement and/or Resolution of this legislative body setting forth the amount, terms and conditions for any reimbursement and/or repayment; and, WHEREAS, a map of said District has been submitted showing the boundaries and properties to be included within said District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, in regular session, this 22nd day of November, 1988 as follows: RECITALS ]. That the above recitals are all true and correct. INITIATIOI] OF PROCEEDINGS 2. That these proceedings are initiated by this legislative body pursuant to the authorization of Section 53318 of the Government Code of the state of California. BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT 3. It is the intention of this legislative body to establish a Community Facilities District pursuant .. the provisions of the Act, the boundaries and parcels baih_ that area of land Ex. 3 • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 .7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22. 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 in which public facilities are to be provided and on which special taxes may be levied in order to pay the cost and expenses for said public facilities. A description of the boundaries of territory proposed to be incFuded in the District is as follows: A11 that property to be served by the installation of the capital facilities, as said property is shown on a map as previously approved by this legislative body, said map designated by the name of this Community Facilities District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and shall remain open for public inspection. NAME OF DISTRICT 4. The name of the proposed Community Facilities District to be established shall be known and deeignated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2. DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES 5. That it is the intention of this legislative body to order the purchase, construction, expansion or rehabilitation of certain real or other tangible property with an estimated useful life of five (5) years or longer. A general descrip- tion of the public capital facilities to be provided is as follows: The construction and/or acquisition of certain street improvements, including grading, paving, curbs, gutters and sidewalks, together with street lighting, drainage facili- ties, landscaping, sanitary sewer, water reservoir and pump facilities and utility facilities, together with appurte- nances and appurtenant work, to serve an area generally hounded on the South by WASHINGTON AVENUE, on the West by MERIDIAN STREET and MOUNTAIN AVENUE, on the East by HEWITT Street and on the North by EVANS (THIRD) STREET, said improvements to serve the properties within the boundaries of the District. For a full and complete description of said facilities, reference is made to the file entitled "DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND COST ESTIMATE", which is hereby referenced and incorporated herein, and a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. For all particulars, reference is made to said file and report. The facilities, as above -described, are facilities which this legislative body is authorized by law to contribute revenue to or to construct, own or operate. It is hereby further found and determined that the proposed facilities are necessary to meet increased demands and needs of this local Agency. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES 6. That it is the further intention of this legislative body to provide certain services that are in addition to those provided in the territory of the District and will not be replacing services already available. A general descrip- tion of the services to be provided is as follows: Additional police and fire services needed to serve the residents and homeowners within the boundaries of the District. The r,r.ptp cf sate services shall ir,: u.:s the ptricrmance t,y employees of all functions, including operation ani mai:t ena r..t. • 1 2 3 4 5 6 '1 e 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SPECIAL TAX 7. That is ;4/hereby further proposed thl,t, except where funds are otherwise available, a special Lax sufficient to pay for said facilities and related incidental expenses autho- rized by the Act will be levied annually within the bounda- .ries of said District. For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit "A", which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed District to clearly estimate the probable annual amount and the maximum annual amount that said person will have to pay for said services and facilities. This legislative body further authorizes that special taxes may be prepaid and satisfied by the payment of the maximum present value of the special tax and all details and parti- culars shall be set forth and adopted by Resolution of this legislative body. The special taxes herein authorized shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes. PUBLIC HEARING 8. NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT ON THE 3RD DAY OF JANUARY, 1989, AT THE HOUR OF 7:30 O'CLOCK. P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING THE COUNCIL CHAI'IBERS, CITY HALL, A PUBLIC HEARING HILL BE HELD WHERE THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY HILL CONSIDER THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PROPOSED COMMU- NITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, THE PROPOSED METHOD AND APPORTION- MENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX, AND ALL OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH IN THIS RESOLUTION OF INTENTION. THAT AT THE ABOVE- MEIITIOIiED TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING, ANY PERSONS INTERESTED, INCLUDING TAXPAYERS, PROPERTY OWNERS AND REGISTERED VOTERS, MAY APPEAR AND BE HEARD, AND THAT THE TESTIMONY OF ALL INTERESTED PERSONS FOR OR AGAINST THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DISTRICT, THE EXTENT OF THE DISTRICT, OP. THE FURNISHING OF THE SERVICES AND FACILITIES, WILL BE HEARD AND CONSIDERED. ANY PROTESTS MAY BE MADE ORALLY OR IN WRITIHC. HOWEVER, ANY PROTESTS PERTAINING TO THE REGULA- RITY OR SUFFICIENCY OF THE PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE IN WRITING AND CLEARLY SET FORTH THE IRREGULARITIES AND DEFECTS TO WHICH THE OBJECTIOIN IS MADE. ALL WRITTEII PROTESTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY ON OR BEFORE THE TIME FIXED FOR THE PUBLIC HEARIING. WRITTEII PROTESTS MAY ❑E WITHDRAWN IN WRITING AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE CONCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. IF WRITTEN PROTESTS AGAINST THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DISTRICT ARE FILED BY FIFTY PERCENT )50t) OR MORE OF THE REGISTERED VOTERS, OR SIX ((i) REGISTERED VOTERS, WHICHEVER. ]S GREATER, RESIDING WITHIN THE PROPOSED DISTRICT, OR OWNERS OF ONE-HALF (1/2) OR HOME OF TIIE AREA OF LAND PROPOSED WITHIN THE DISTRICT, THE PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE ABANDONED. IF SAID MAJORITY PROTEST ]5 LIMITED TO CERTAIN SERVICES, FACILITIES OR SPECIAL TAX, THOSE SERVICES, FACILI- TIES OR THAT TAX SHALL BE ELIMINATED BY THE LFGISLF.TIVE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 I. 27 28 29 30 31 • ELECTION B. lf, following the public hearing described in the Section above, the legislative body determines to establish the District and proposes to levy a special tax within the District, the legislative body shall then submit the levy of the special taxes to the qualified electors of the District. If at least twelve (12) persons, who need not necessarily be the same twelve (12) persons, have been registered to vote within the District for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the close of the subject hear- ing, the vote shall be by registered voters of the District, with each voter having one (1) vote. Otherwise, the vote shall be by the landowners of the District who were the owners of record at the close of the subject hearing, with each landowner having one (1) vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land owned within the District. A successful election relating to the special tax authoriza- tion shall, as applicable, establish and/or change the appropriations limit as authorized by Article %IIIB of the California Constitution as it is applicaDlr to thin District. NO PRIVATE CONTRACT 9. This legislative body hereby finds and determines that the public interest will not be served by allowing the property owners of 3/4's of the area to make an election to take over and perform any works of improvement pursuant to a contract awarded by this legislative body. This finding does not prohibit the property owners from directly enter- ing into a contract to perform and construct certain of the works of improvement. IIOTI C•E 10. That notice of the time and place of the public hearing shall be aiven by the City Clerk in the following manner: 11. A. A Notice of Public Hearing shall be published in the legally designated newspaper of general circulation, being the HEMET NEWS, said publication pursuant to Section 606] of the Government Code, with said publica- tion to be completed at least seven (7) days prior tc the date set for the public hearing. B. A Notice of Public Hearing shall be mailed, postage prepaid, to each property owner and registered voter within the boundaries of the proposed District: said mailing to the property owners shall be to the address as shown on the last equalized assessment roll. .Said mailing shall be completed at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date set for the public hearing. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW All environmental evaluation proceedings relating to the establishment and funding of this District shall be completed prior to the date and time set for the public hearing. 1 11 • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1✓ 16 17 18 19 20 21 on 23 24 26 26 27 28 29 30 31 CERTIFICATION 12. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED AT A REGULAR MEE.ING, OF SAID CITY COUNCIL duly held the 22nd day of Rol/ tuber, 198 ATTEST: Vy/�r..L .a/ . : Y� .'e. it-• b'eputy City Clerk CERTIFICATE The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of a P.es.olution duly adopted by said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date therain set forth. ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 26 27 28 29 30 1 •I 32 CITY OF SAN JhC1NTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 . EXHIBIT "A" RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX. The Resolution of Intention refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and apportionment of the special tax so as to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed district to estimate the maximum annual amount that would be required for payment. For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment, see the following: PROPERTY CATEGORIES AND MAXIMUM ANNUAL TAX Taxable property categories and initial maximum annual taxes are ae follows: MAXIMUM ANNUAL TAX PROPERTY CATEGORY (FISCAL YEAR 1989-90) RESIDENTIAL UNIT II. COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL TAX: "A": S0.59 per square foot per year for develo},.+d area TAX. "B": S9E.40 per dwelling unit TAX "h": 51.00 per square foot per year for developed area TAX "D": $0.05 per square foot p.r year for developed area RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL taxes shall be levied on all property upon the issuance of a building permit in the fiscal year next following the issuance of the building permit-. III. ACREAGE The following acreage shall be that as shown on any approved tentative or final parcel map and/or subdivision, map: A. APARTMENT UNIT: Not to exceed $7S00 per acre per year B. ANY OTHER RESIDENTIAL USE: Not to exceed $6500 per acre per year C. COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USE: Not to exceed S7500 per year ALL OTHER ACREAGE NOT SHOWN ON A MAY: Not to exceed $7500 per year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2d 21 .2•r ,. J 24 25 26 27 2e 29 30 ;.1 • APPLICATION OF ThX FIRST, each year determine the amount of money necessary to pay for all authorized facilities, services and bond obligation. SECOND, determine number of taxable RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL UNITS where building permits have been issued as of June 30th of any fiscal year and levy taxes not to exceed the annual maximum amount allowable. THIRD, to the extent necessary to make payments for bond obliga- tion and/or for authorized services, levy taxes on ACREAGE land not to exceed the maximum amounts allowable. ESCALATION OF TA): The above authorized taxes for are for fiscal year 1989-90, and are subject to annual increases as follows: TAX "A" (RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL) eha11 be annually increased to reflect increases in the Construction Cost Index, but nut less than 2% per year. Ohre property in subject to a building permit, the property and tax rate shall be subject to the annual increase not to exceed 2% per year. TAX. "B" (RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL) shall be annually increased to reflect increases in the Consumer Price Index. The CATEGORY 111 ACREAGE TAX. shall be annually increased tc reflect increases in the Construction C.:-E: index. The Final Lend Use Tax "A" for Residential, Commercial and Industrial taxes, uha11 be levied for a period of 25 years IC'm its initial levy. The Final Land Use Residential Tax "B" shall be levied as long as necessary to pay for additional services. The Acreage Tax 611a11 be levied as long as necessary to make payment for services and payment on bond ublivationu. DEFINITIONS The "Construction Cost Index" shall be the Construction Cost Index for the City of Los Angeles, as adjusted annually, based upon available data as of June 30th o1 each year, es set forth in the Engineering News -Record (ENR), McGraw-Hill Construction Weekly. The "Consumer Price Index" shall be the Los Angeles/Riverside Area - All Urban Consumer Price Index, published by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, as said data is available June 30th of each fiscal year. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 e- 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2,2 • "Developed Area" shall be all land as measured from outside walls, excluding garage, covered ways and overhangs, patios and additions. "Fiscal Year" shall be July 1 through June 30. . • 11 For all particulars relating to implementation, further interpre- tation, definitions, and all other particulars related to the method and apportionment of the tax, reference is made to the Report of Engineer as previously approved by this legislative body. AGENDA ITEM 5v/" June 3, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer SUBJECT: Main Street, Soboba Road, Esplanade Avenue, and Artesia Street Pavement Rehabilitation RECOMMENDATION: By motion, award public works contract to Matich Corporation, for the sum of $1,076,076, plus 15% contingency, reject all other bids received, and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. BACKGROUND: On April 1, 2004, Council authorized staff to advertise for construction of Main Street, Soboba Road, and Esplanade Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation. Subsequently on April 15, 2004, Council approved the addition of Artesia Avenue Paving Improvements to this project. Bids were opened on May 18, 2004, with three bids received ranging from $1,076,076 to $1,385,455 (staffs estimate is $1,300,000.00). Matich Corporation has previously performed work in the City; their workmanship is satisfactory. Mandatory construction start date is June 21, 2004, and a completion date of September 28, 2004. Soboba Road work will start first, followed by Esplanade Avenue, Main Street, and Artesia Avenue. JUSTIFICATION: Improve the road conditions of four of the City's major, local, and secondary roads. Page 1 of 2 BUDGETARY IMPACT: Adequate funding is available to offset the cost of the proposed improvements through Measure "A" funds, Development Agreement fees, and AB 2928 funding. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Bid Summary Page 2 of 2 Bid Opening: May 18, 2004 @ 2:00 pm Main St., Esplanade Ave., Soboba, and Artesia Pavement Rehab COMPANY NAME: Bid Amount Bid Bonds Acknowledgement of Addendum No. 1 Matich Corporation $1,076,076.00 J J Vance Corporation $1,218,121.00 J J RJ Noble Company $1,385,455.00 J J AGENDA ITEM 601 D 5` June 3, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Mitch Alm, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Approval of Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund Grant Spending Plan (FY 2003) RECOMMENDATION: By motion, approve the proposed Spending Plan for the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) Grant. BACKGROUND: Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Grant funding is received from the State of California's Citizen's Option for Public Safety Programs via the County of Riverside. The program began in 1997 and continues to be funded. The use of SLES funds is only for front-line municipal police services and should supplement, not supplant, current front-line law enforcement services. The Spending Plan is approved by a Supplemental Law Enforcement Oversight Committee that is chaired by the Sheriff of Riverside County. Once the Plan has been approved and submitted the funding should occur in late December 2003. The City of San Jacinto is entitled to receive a grant award in the amount of $100,000. Initially these monies were to be utilized for the purchase of mobile data computers (MDCs), which would be subsequently placed in patrol vehicles. Due to the recent decision by the City of San Jacinto to contract for police services with the Riverside County Sheriffs Department. The grant funds will not be needed for the original purpose. The funding will now be utilized for regular salaries, benefits and services, which is permissible under the SLESF Grant guidelines. City Manage Finance Director: Page 1 of 2 JUSTIFICATION: The Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund allows for expenditures to cover salaries, benefits, services, equipment or administrative overhead. BUDGETARY IMPACT: There are no anticipated general fund costs. This is a standalone grant and no matching funds are required. ATTACHMENTS: " A " — Original SLESF Staff Report dated November 20, 2003. " B " — Copy of original grant from the Riverside County Sheriff Department's Grants Unit. Page 2of2 AGENDA ITEM November 20, 2003 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Dan Nichols, Interim Chief of Police By: Keith Knotek, Police Commander SUBJECT: Approval of Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund Grant Spending Plan (FY 2003) RECOMMENDATION: By motion, approve the proposed Spending Plan for the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) Grant. BACKGROUND: Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Grant funding is received from the State of California's Citizen's Option for Public Safety Programs via the County of Riverside. The program began in 1997 and continues to be funded. The use of SLES funds is only for front-line municipal police services and should supplement, not supplant, current front-line law enforcement services. The Spending Plan is approved by a Supplemental Law Enforcement Oversight Committee that is chaired by the Sheriff of Riverside County. Once the Plan has been approved and submitted the funding should occur in late December 2003. The City of San Jacinto is entitled to receive a grant award in the amount of $100,000. These monies can be used for salaries, benefits, services, equipment and administrative overhead. After conferring with the City Manager, staff proposes that the grant funds be used for the purchase of mobile data computers (MDCs) to be utilized in the patrol cars. These computers will interface with the Department's new computer aided dispatch and records management system. It's currently unknown exactly how many MDCs can be purchased with the grant funds. However, it is estimated that approximately six to eight computers, software and other related items can be secured with the grant funds. In no case shall the expenditures for these items exceed the $100,000 award amount. Approvals City Manager: Finance Director: Page 1 of 2 JUSTIFICATION: The mobile data computers will improve efficiency by allowing officers to write reports out in the field rather than in the police facility. They will also provide officers with records information in their vehicles rather than having to go through dispatch for queries. BUDGETARY IMPACT: There are no anticipated general fund costs. This is a standalone grant and no matching funds are required. ATTACHMENTS: " A "- Letter from the Sheriff to City Manager Cosentini requesting expenditure plan. Page 2 of 2 MAY-14-04 FRI 08:05 AM Bob Doyle, Sheriff FAX: PAGE 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT Grants 'Unit FAX COVER SHEET DATE: May 14, 2004 NUMBER OF PAGES: 16 TO: NAME: Lt. Mitch Alin LOCATION: San Jacinto Police Department FAX NUMBER (909) 654-5600 TELEPHONE NUMBER (909) 453-5093 FROM: E lizab"th J. Olson, A d»amstnztize Serzias Officer FAX NUMBER (909) 955-9620 TELEPHONE NUMBER (909) 955-9614 MESSAGE OR SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS Included in this packet is the proposed expenditure plan the city submitted in November 03, the State's expenditure time line based upon allocations, and copies of the bill and the government code. The bottom line is that as long as the funds are spent on front line law enforcement you'll be fine. Riverside County Sheriff's Department 4095 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92501 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) Timeline Sknate Bills 736 and 823 (revised March 2003) 1516-2000 2000-01 { 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 7/1 7.: 7/1 711 2004-05 1 2005-06 7/1 7/1 6/30 6/30 Balance of unspent SLESF funds 1996-2000 spent or encurr.;ered 'Liquidation of encumbered 1996-2000 funds 6/30 6/30 6/30 2000-01 SLESF received 01 spr.t or encumbered Liquidation ofencumbered 2000-01 funds 2001-02 SLESF received 6/30 spent or encumbered Liquidation of encumbered 2001-02 funds 2002-03 SLESF received 6//30 spent or encumbered Liquidation of encumbered 2002-03 funds MAY-14-04 FRI 08:06 AM FAX: PAGE 2 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund Expenditure Plan 2003-2004 City I7'/ Off' Sr'>-N -3-A-C1 AIM Beginning Fund Balance Current Year Allocation Expenditures Planned o no Salaries and Benefits Services and Supplies Equipment /DO, )00 Administrative Overhead ,.S, p OO Total Planned Expenditures / ary 000 Date approved by the City Council: N:D0el.rrale-3e 2D, 2oo3 The City Manager hereby certifies that the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Plan was submitted to the�City Council and approved as listed. City Manager 1i/ar/o3 Date Please provide the name of a contact person if there are any questions_ Arr.eAjAa swim ./ L�-Y0 4) pi_ 7.3.3 7 Name jN�NGE , ,o.G77,p Telephone Riverside County SLESF Oversight Committee October 30, 2003 City 2004 expenditure plawds MAY-14-04 FRI 08:06 AM FAX: PAGE 4 Senate Bill No. 823 C1(APTER 21 An act to amend Sections 30061 and 30063 of the Government Code, relating to law enforcement funding, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately. [Approved by Governor April (, 2002. riled with Secretary of State Apra 11. 2U1)2,J LEGISLtfIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 823, Poochigian_ Local law enforcement funding. Existing law establishes in each county treasury a Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund that receives from the Controller an annual allocation of state funds. Moneys„f o thi, food are rggilired to be allocated by the county auditor to the county, each city located within that county and designated districts providing law enforcement services, in accordance wilki egg cified reauucmeDts. The moneys arc allocated for, among other things, frontline law enforcement services and.thc implementation of a eomprehensivc multiagency juvenile justice _plan. Existing law requires each county or city and county to report annually on those programs to the County board of supervisors and the Board of Corrections beginning August 15, 2001. Existing law requires the Board of Corrections to compile the local reports and make a report to the Governor and Legislature by January l5, 2003, and annually thereafter, as provided. Existing law also requires a county, city, or city and county Supplemental Law Enforcement Oversight Committee to submit data detailing and summarizing allocations to the Controller and provides that the county, city, or city and county shall forfeit its allocation if that data is not provided_ This bill would require the annual report on those programs to be made beginning October 15, 2002, and would prohibit the ex ,enditure of allocated funds and interest thereon if that report and the data detailing, and summarizing allocationsarre not submitted. This bill would require the Board of Corrections to compilelocal reppai . make.. ,report to the Governor ant! Lcaislattirc by M h,,,15. 2,03„g4Sl annually thereafter. The bill, would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. 93 MAY-14-04 FRI 08:06 AM Ch, 21 _2— FAX: PAGE 5 The people of the State. of California do enact as,JollowY: SECTION 1. Section 30061 atilt; Government Code is amended to read: 30061. (a) There shall be established in each county treasury a Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF), to receive all amounts allocated to a county for purposes of intplementing,this chapter. (b) In any fiscal year for which a county receives money to be expended for thc implementation of this chapter, the county auditor shall allocate moneys in the county's SLESF, including any interest or other return anted on the investment of those moneys, within 30 days of the deposit of those moneys into the fund, and shall allocate those moneys in accordance with the requirements set forth in this subdivision. However, the auditor shall not transfer those moneys to a recipient agency until the Supplemental Law Enforcement Oversight Committee certifies receipt of an approved expenditure plan from the governing board of that agency. (1) Five and fifteen one hundredth: percent (5.15%) to the county sheriff for mat:4W c_g0struetion and operation. in thc case of Madera, Napa, and Santa Clara Counties, this allocution shall be made to the county director or chief of corrections_ (2) Five and fifteen one hundredths percent (5.15%) to the district attorney for criminal prosecution. (3) Thirty-nine and seven -tenths percent (39.7%) to the cow mud 1,12,qt<.lti s._mil,tltlrl. CRt1A-ty, and, in the case of San Mateo, Kern, Sislciyou, and Contra Costa Counties, also to thc 13roadmoor Police Protection District, the Bear Valley Community Services District, the Stallion Springs Community Services District, the Lake Shastina Community Services District, and the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District, in accordance with the relative population (Atha cities within thc county and thc unincorporated area of the county, and the 13roadmoor Police Protection District in the County of San Mateo, the Bear Valley Conununity Services District and the Stallion Springs Community Services District in Kern County, the Luke Shastina Community Services District in Siskiyou County, and the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District in Contra Costa County, as specified in the most recent January estimate by the population research .unit of the Department of Finance, and as adjusted to provide a grant of tit least one (Hundred iholsand dollars ($100 000) to .each lnw rntIreemCut. juziedielion. For a newly incorporated city whose population estimate is not published by the Department of Finance but which was incorporated prior to July t of the fiscal year in which an allocation from the SLPSF is to be made, the city manager, or 9} MAY-14-04 FRI 0B:07 AM FAX: PAGE 6 _ g _ Ch. 2] an appointee of the legislative body, if a city manager is not available, and the county administrative or executive officer shall prepare a joint notification to the Department of Finance and the county auditor with a population estimate reduction of the unincorporated area of the county equal to the population of the newly incorporated city by July 15, or within 15 days after the Budgct Act is enacted, of the fiscal year in which an allocation from the SLESF is to be made. No person residing within the Broadrnoor Police Protection District, the Bear Valley Community Services District, the Stallion Springs Community Services District, the Lake Shastina Community Services District, or the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District shall also be counted us residing within the unincorporated arca of the County of San Mateo, Kern, Siskiyou, or Contra Costa, or within any city located within those counties. The county auditor shall allocate a t of at least one hundred the anci_cjollars ($100 009) to each law enforcement _jurisdiction. Moneys allocated to the county pursuant to this subdivision shall be retained in the county SLESF, and moneys allocated to a city pursuant to this subdivision shall be deposited in a SLESF established in the city treasury. (4) Fifty percent (50%) to the county or city and county to implement a comprehensive multiageney juvenile justice plan as provided in this paragraph. This plan shall be developed by the local juvenile justice coordinating council in each county and city and county with thc membership described in Section 749.22 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. If a plan has been previously approved by the Board of Corrections, the plan shall be reviewed and modified annually by the council. The plan or modified plan shall be approved by the county hoard of supervisors, and in the cast of a city and county, the plan shall also be approved by the mayor. The plan or modified plan shall be submitted to the Board of Corrections by May 1, 2002, and annually thereafter. (A) Juvenile justice plans shall include, but not be limited to, all of the .following components: (i) An assessment of existing law enforcement, probation, education, mental health, health, social services, drug and alcohol and youth services resources that specifically target at -risk juveniles, juvenile offenders, and their families. (ii) An identification and prioritization of the neighborhoods, schools, and other areas in thc community that face a significant public safety risk from juvenile crime, such as gang activity, daylight burglary, late -night robbery, vandalism, truancy, controlled substances sales, firearm -related violence, and juvenile substance abuse and alcohol usc. (iii) A local juvenile justice action strategy that provides for a continuum of responses to juvenile erime and delinquency and 93 F MAY-14-04 FRI 08:07 AM FAX: PAGE 7 Ch_ 21 —4— demopstratcs a collaborative and integrated approach for implementing a system of swiii, certain, and graduated responses for at -risk youth and juvenile. offenders. (iv) Programs identified in clause (iii) that are proposed to be funded pursuant to this subparagraph, including the projected amount of funding for each program. (8) Programs proposed to be funded shall satisfy all of the following requirements: (i) Be based on programs and approaches that have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing delinquency and addressing juvenile crime for any elements of response to juvenile crime and delinquency, including prevention, intervention, suppression, and incapacitation. (ii) Collaborate and integrate services of all the resources set forth in clause (i) of subparagraph (A), to thc extent appropriate. (iii) Employ information sharing systems to ensure that county actions arc fully coordinated, and designed to provide data for measuring the success of juvenile justice programs and strategies. (iv) Adopt goals related to the outcome measures that shall be used to determine the effectiveness of the local juvenile justice action strategy. e (C) The plan shall also ideotify the specific objectives of the programs proposal for funding and specified outcome measures to determine the effectiveness of the programs and on accounting for all program participants, including those wlto do not complete thc programs.. Outcome measures of thc programs proposed to be funded shall include, but not be limited to, all of the following: (i) The rate of juvenile arrests per 100,000 population. (ii)' The rate of successful completion of probation. (iii) The rate of successful completion of restitution and court -ordered community service responsibilities. (iv) Arrest, incarceration, and probation violation rates of program participants. (v) Quantification of the annual per capita costs of the program, (D) The Board of Corrections shall review plans or modified plans submitted pursuant to this paragraph within 30 days upon receipt of submitted or resubmitted plans or modified plans. The board shall approve only those plans or modified plans that fulfill the requirements of this paragraph, and shall advise a submitting county or city and county immediately upon the approval of its plan or modified plan. The board shall offer, and provide if requested, technical assistance to any county or city and county that submits a plan or modified plan not in compliance with the requirements of this paragraph. The SLI3SF shall only allocate 93 MAY-14-04 FRI 08:07 AM FAX: PAGE 8 Ch. 21 finding pursuant to this paragraph upon notification from the board that a plan or modified plan has been approved. (E) To assess the effectiveness of programs funded pursuant to this paragraph using the program outcome criteria specified in subparagraph (C), the following periodic reports shall be submitted: (i) Ear kounty or city and county shall report, beginning October 15, 2002. and attnuajly each October 15 thereafter, to the countyhoard of Aup nd:th_agard gi Corrections, in a format specified by the Board of Corrections, on the programs funded pursuant to this chapter and program outcomes as specified in subparagraph (C). (ii) The Board of Corrections shall compile the local reports and, by March 15, 2003, and annually thereafter, make a report to the Governor and the Legislature on program expenditures within each county and city and county from the appropriation for thc purposes of this paragraph, on the outcomes as specified in subparagraph (C) of the programs funded pursuant to this paragraph and the statewide effectiveness of the comprehensive multiagency juvenile justice plans. (c) Subject to subdivision (d), for each fiscal year in which the county, each city, the Broadmoor Police Protection District, the Bear Valley Community Services District, the Stallion Springs Community Services District, the Lake Shastina Community Services District, and thc Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District receive moneys pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (b), the county, each city, and each district spccificd in this subdivision shall appropriate those moneys in accordance with the following procedures: (1) In the casc of thc county, the_.county_board of supeiyas.or .shall glop.5 1rldky-t i&ti g._anti. anticipated ,moncyy ,wc 1Sslagxely..tp_proyide. frontline law enforcement services, other than those services specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (b), in the unincorporated areas oldie county,,jn response to written requests submitted to the hoard by the county sheriff and the district attorney,, Any request submitted pursuant to this paragraph shall specify the frontline law enforcement needs of the requesting entity, and those personnel, equipment, and programs that are necessary to meet those needs. The board shalt, at a public hearing held in September in each year that the Legislature. approprjates.funds for_purposes of this chapter, cons] r. ►r ,d dererr dine each submitted request within 60 days of reccip_t tursuant to the decision of n majorityofs oyl tram. pre. ent_ The board shall consider these written requests separate and apart from the process applicable to proposed allocations of the county general fund. (2) In the case of a city, the city council shall appropriate existing and anticipated moneys exclusively to fund frontline munieipj police __ services., in accordance with written requests submitted by the chief of 93 MAY-14-04 FRI 08:08 AM FAX: PAGE 9 Ch. 21 police of that city or the chief administrator of the law enforcement agency that provides police services for that city. These written requests shall be acted upon by the city council in the same manner as specified in paragraph (1) for county appropriations. (3) In the case of the iiroadmoor Police Protection District within the County of San Mateo, the Bear Valley Community Services District or the Stallion Springs Community Services District within Kern County, the Lake Shastina Community Services District within Siskiyou County, or the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District within Contra Costa County, the legislative body of that special district shall appropriate existing and anticipated moneys exclusively to fund frontline inunicipal police services, in accordance with, written requests submitted by the chief administrator of the law enforcement agency that provides police services for that special district, These written requests shall be acted upon by the legislative body in the same manner specified in paragraph (1) for county appropriations. (d) For each fiscal year in which the county, a city, or the Broadrnoor Police Protection District within the County of San Mateo, the 13car Valley Community Services District or the Stallion Springs Conununity Services District within Korn County, the Lake Shastina Community Services District within Siskiyou County, or the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District within Contra Costa County receives any moneys pursuant to this chapter, in no event shall the governing body of any of those recipient agencies subsequently alter any previous, valid appropriation by that body, for that same fiscal year, of moneys allocated to the county or city pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (b). (e) Funds,rccciyed_pursuant to subdivision (bl shall be expended or encunabercd in accordance with thia chapter no later that-111,000 of the followjpg,fisgal_Y,e_ar. A local agency that has not met this requirement shall remit unspent SLESF moneys to the Controller for deposit into the General Fund. (f) In the event that a county, a city, a city and county, or a qualifying special district does not comply with the requirements of this chapter to receive an SLESF allocation, tho Controller shall revert thosc funds to the General Fund. SEC. 2, Section 30063 of the Government Code is amended to read: 30063. (a) The Supplemental Law Enforcement krviccsFund. (SLESF) in each county or it is to be expended exclusively as required b.y_thia chapter. Mrmeyg in that.,fund. shall_natlr...transfprr'd_.to,..or i[lt rmingl�d b,.fhc moncv5 �ti s y_olher futain he..ccuaty_or city - treasury, except that moneys may be transferred from the SLESF to the county's or city's general fund to the extent necessary to facilitate the 93 r MAY-14-04 FRI 08:08 AM FAX: PAGE 10 _ q _ Ch. 21 appropriation and expenditure of those transferred moneys in the manner required by this chapter. (b) Moneys in a SLESF may only be invested in safe and conservative investments in accordance with those standard.; of prudent investment applicable to the invcsunent of trust moneys. The, treasurer of the county and each city shall provide a month/ SLESF jpvcstm nt repsit,S��ithcr thepolice chief or the enUntx,texiaadistricl.attorney, as.applicablc• (c) Each year; at least 30 days prior to the date of the duly noticed public hearing required pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of Section 30061, the county auditor and city treasurer shall detail and summarize allocations from the county's or city's SLESF, as applicable, in a written,.public report filed with the Supplemental Law Enforcement Oversight Committee (SLEOC), the county board of supervisors, or the city council, as applicable, for the entirety of the immediately preceding fiscal year, and the county sheriff or police chief, as applicable. '(d) A summary of the annual reports required in subdivision (c) shill be submitted in a standardized format to be developed by the Controller, in conjunction with the California District Attorney's Association, California Police Chief's Association, California State Sheriff's Association, California Peace Officer's Association, California County Auditor's' Association, and California Municipal Treasurer's Association, by each SLEOC to the Controller on or before October 15, 2001, and each year thereafter. The Controller shall make a copy of the summarized reports available to the Governor, the Legislature, and the Legislative Analyst's office, (o) By March 1 of each year, the Legislative Analyst's office shall report to the Legislature on the types of expenditures mark by local law enforcement agencies in the previous fiscal year pursuant to this chapter, and, to the extent feasible, on the effect, of those expenditures on law enforcement and public safety. (f) R, ertanty, a may, or a city and county that fails.to submit the data required pursuant to subdivision (d) of this section•or to report as required pursuant to clause (i) of subparagraph (E) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Section 30061 shall not continue to expend funds allocated pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 30061 or interest earned pursuant to subdivision (h) of this section until that data and that report are submitted as required by this chapter. (g) Notwithstanding subdivision (f), if the Supplemental Law Enforcement Oversight Committee (SLEOC) fails to transmit the data to the Controller required pursuant to subdivision (d), the local law enforcement agency may submit its expenditure data directly to the Controller no later than 15 days after the date specified in subdivision (d) if the local law enforcement agency has complied with other 93 MAY-14-04 FRI 08:08 AM FAX: PAGE 11 Ch. 21 —8— requirements in this chapter, it may continue to expend funds allocated and interest earned pursuant to this chapter. SEC. 3. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity arc: In order to ensure that cities, counties, and cities and counties submit required data and make reports on a timely basis in order to continue to expend funds for supplemental law enforcement services, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately. 0 `ll MAY-14-04 FRI 08:08 AM CA Codes (gov:30061-30065) GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 30061-30065 FAX: PAGE 12_ rage 1 1.11 30061. (a) There shall be established in each county treasury a Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fun d (SLESF), to receive all amounts allocated to a county for purpose s of implementing this chapter. (b) In any fiscal year for which a cou my receives money to be expended for the implementation of this c hapter, the county auditor shall allocate moneys in the county's SLE SF, including any intereet or other return earned on the investment of those moneys, within 30 days of the deposit of those moneys into the fund, and shall allocate those moneys in accordance with the regiii rements set forth in this subdivision. However, the auditor shall not transfer those moneys to a recipient agency until the Splemental Law Enforcement oversight Committee certifies recut ofau approve d expenditure plan from the governing board of that, agency. y w 4 yu (1)Five a and fifteen one hundredths pe rcent (5.15%) to the county sheriff for county jail construction and operation. in the case of Madera, Napa, and Santa Clara Counties, t his allocation shall be made to the county director or chief of c:orrec tions. (2) Five and fifteen one hundredths pe rcent (5.15%) to the distri.et.attorney for criminal proseCutio n. (3) Thirty-nine and seven -tenths percent (39.7%) to the county and the cities within the county, and, in the case of San Mateo, Kern, Siskiyou, and Contra Costa Counties, also to the Broadmoor Police Protection District, the Bear Valley Comm unity Services District, the Stallion Springs Community Services Distr ict, the Lake Shastina Community Services District, and the Kens ington police Protection and Community Services District, in accordant e with the relative population of the cities within the count y and the unincorporated area of the county, and the Broadmoor Pol ice Protection District in the County of San Mateo, the 2ear Valley Community Services District and the Stallion Springs Community Servic es District in Kern County, the Lake Shastina Community Services Dist rict in Siskiyou County, and the Kensington Police Protection and Comm unity Services District in Contra Costa County, as specified in the most recent January estimate by the population research unit of the De partmcnt of Finance, and as adjusted to provide a grant of at least o ne hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) to each law enforcement jurisd fiction. For a newly incorporated city whose population estima to is not published by the Department of Finance but which was incar porated prior to July 1 of the fiscal year in which an allocation fr om the SLESF is to be made, the city manager, or an appointee of the legislative body, if a city manager is not available, and the county administrative or executive officer shall prepare a joint notificatio n to the Department of Finance and the county auditor with a pop elation estimate reduction of the unincorporated area of the county equal to the population of the newly incorporated city by July 15, o r within 15 days after the Budget Act is enacted, of the fiscal year in which an allocation from the SLESF is to be made. No person resid ing within the Broadmoor. Police Protection District, the Pear Vall ey Community Services District, the Stallion Springs Community Services District, the Lake Shastina Community Services District, or the Kensington Police Protection and Community services Distr..ic t shall also be counted as residing within tho unincorporated area o f the County of San Mateo, ttp://www.leginfo,ca.gov/cgi bin/displaycode?section=gov&group=30001-31000&file=3... 9/12/2002 MAY-14-04 FRI 08:09 AM CA Codes (gov:30061-30065) Kern, Siskiyou, or Contra Costa, or withi those counties. The county auditor shall least one hundred thousand dollars ($100, jurisdiction. Moneys allocated to the co subdivision shall be retained in the coun allocated to a city pursuant to this subd in a SLESF established in the city treasu (4) Fifty percent (50%) to the county implement a comprehensive multiagcncy juv provided in this paragraph. This plan sh local juvenile justice coordinating counc and county with the membership described welfare and Institutions Code. If a plan approved by the Board of Corrections, the modified annually by the council. The pl be approved by the county board of supery city and county, the plan shall also be a plan or modified plan shall be submitted by May 1, 2002, and annually thereafter. (A) Juvenile justice plans shall inclu all of the following components: (i) An assessment of existing law enfo rcement, probation, education, mental health, health, social services, drug and alcohol and youth services resources that specifi cally target at -risk juveniles, juvenile offenders, and their families. (ii) An identification and prioritizat ion of the neighborhoods, schools, and other areas in the community that face a significant public safety risk from juvenile crime, e uch as gang activity, daylight burglary, late -night robbery, vandalism, truancy, contro fled substances sales, firearm -related violence, and juvenile substance abuse and alcohol use: for a (iii) A local juvenile justice action strategy that provides continuum of responses to juvenile crime and delinquency and demonstrates a collaborative and 1nteyrat ed approach for implementing a system of swift, certain, and graduated responses for at -risk youth and juvenile offenders. (iv) programs identified in clause (ii i) that are proposed to be funded pursuant to this subparagraph, Inc luding the projected amount of funding for each program. (B).Programs proposed to be funded sha 11 satisfy all of the following requirements: (i) Be based on programs and approache demonstrated to be effective in reducing juvenile crime for any elements of respon delinquency, including prevention, intern incapacitation. (ii) Collaborate and integrate service forth in clause.(i) of subparagraph (A), (iii.). Employ information sharing syste actions are fully coordinated, and design measuring the success of juvenile justice (iv) Adopt goals related to the outcom used to determine the effectiveness of th action strategy. (C) The plan shall also identify the s programs proposed for funding and spccifi determine the effectiveness of the progra program participants, including those who programs. Outcome measures of the progra shall include, but not be limited to, all FAX: PAGE 13 n any city located within allocate a grant of at. 000) to each law enforcement unty pursuant to this ty SLESF, and moneys ivision shall be deposited ry. or city and county to enile justice plan as all be developed by the it in each county and city in Section 749.22 of the has been previously plan shall be reviewed and an or modified plan shall isors, and in the case of a pproved by the mayor. The to the Hoard of Corrections de, but not be limited to, s that have been delinquency and addressing se to juvenile crime and ention, suppression, and s of all the resources set to the extent appropriate. ms to ensure that county ed to provide data for programs and strategies. e measures that' shall be e local juvenile justice pecific objectives of the ed outcome measures to ms and an accounting for all do not complete the me proposed to be funded of the following: rase L Vi 1 http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-binitli splaycode?section—gov&group=30001-31000&file-3... 9/12/2002 MAY-14-04 FRI 08:09 AM CA Codes (gov:30061-30065) �cLy% FAX: (i) The rate of juvenile arrests per 1 00,000 population. (ii) The rate of successful completion of probation_ (iii) The rate of successful completio tl of restitution and court -ordered community service responsibilitie s. (iv) Arrest, incarceration, and probation violation rates of program participants. (v) Quantification of the annual per c apita costs of the program. (D) The Board of Corrections shall rev iew plans or modified plans submitted pursuant to this paragraph with in 30 days upon receipt of submitted or resubmitted plans or modifie d plans. The hoard shall s that fulfill the advise a submitting pproval of its plan Or d provide if requested, y and county that submits a ith the requirements of this funding pursuant to this d that a plan or modified approve only those plans or modified plan requirements of this paragraph, and shall or city and county immediately upon the a modified plan. The board shall offer, an technical assistance to any county or cit plan or modified plan not in compliance w paragraph. The SLESF shall only allocate paragraph upon.notification from t.hc hoar plan has been approved. (E) To assess the effectiveness of pro grams funded pursuant to this paragraph using the program outcome criteria specified in subparagraph (C), the following periodic reports shall be submitted: (i) Each county or city and county sha 15, 2002, and annually each October 15 th board of supervisors and the Board of Cor specified by the Board of Corrections, on pursuant to this chapter and program outc subparagraph (C). (ii) The Board of Corrections shall co by March'15, 2003, and annually thereafte Governor and the Legislature on program e county and city and county from the appro this paragraph, on the outcomes as specie the programs funded pursuant to this pars effectiveness of the comprehensive multia plans. (c) Subject to subdivision (d), for ea ch fiscal year in which the county, each city, the Broadmoor Police P rotection District, the Bear Valley Community Services District_, the S tallion Springs Community Services District, the Lake Shasr.ina Comm unity Services District, and the Kensington police Protection and Community Services District receive moneys pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (b), the county, each city, and each district spec ified in this subdivision shall appropriate those moneys in accorda nce with the following procedures! (1) In the case of the county, the cou my board of supervisors shall appropriate existing and anticipate d moneys exclusively to provide frontline law enforcement service s, other than those services specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of su bdivision (b), in the unincorporated areas of the county, in re sponse to written requests submitted to the board by the county her iff and the district attorney. Any request submitted pursuant to this paragraph shall specify the frontline law enforcement nee ds of the requesting entity, and those personnel, equipment, and progr airs that are necessary to meet those needs. The board shall, at a public hearing held in September in each year that the Legislate re appropriates funds for purposes of this chapter, consider and de termine each submitted request within 60 days of receipt, pursue. nt to the decision of a county PAGE 14 rage .5 of i 11 report, beginning October ereafter, to the county rections, in a format the programs funded omen as specified in mpile the local reports and, r, make a report to the xpendi.tures within each priation for the purposes of ied in subparagraph (C) of graph and the statewide gency juvenile justice http://vvww.legi n fo. ca. gov/egi-bin/di splaycode?section=gov&group=30001-31000&flue=3... 9/12/2002 MAY-14-04 FRI 08:10 AM CA Codes (gov:30061-3UU65) FAX: PAGE 15 rage + ur i majority of a quorum present. The board shall consider these written requests separate and apart from the proc ess applicable to proposed allocations of the county genera]. fund. (2) In the case of a city, the city co until shall appropriate existing and anticipated moneys exclusive ly to fund frontline municipal police services, in accordance with written requests submitted by the chief of police of that city or the chief administrator of the law enforcement agen cy that provides police services for that city. These written re quests shall be acted upon by the city council in the same manner as specified in paragraph (1) for county appropriations. (3) In the case of the Broadmoor Polio e Protection District within the County of San Mateo, the Bear Valley community Services District or the Stallion Springs Community Service s District within Kern County, the Lake Shastina Community Servi ces District within Siskiyou County, or the Kensington Police Protecti on and Community Services District within_Contra Costa County, the legislative body of that special district shall appropriate exists ng and anticipated moneys exclusively to fund frontline municipal p olice services, in accordance with written requests submitte d by the chief administrator of the law enforcement agency that provid es police services for r.hat special district. These written requests shall be acted upon by the legislative body in the same manner spcci fied in paragraph (1) for county appropriations. (d) For each fiscal year in which the county, a city, or the Broadmoor Police Protection District with in the County of San Mateo, the Bear Valley Community Services Dietri ct or the Stallion Springs Community Services District within Kern C ounty, the Lake Shastina Community Services District within Siskiy ou County, or the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District within Contra 4..„)Costa County receives any moneys pursuant to this chapter, in no event shall the governing body of any of those recipient agencies subsequently alter any previous, valid ap propriaticn by that body, for that same fiscal year, of moneys allo cated to the county or city pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (b). (e) Funds received pursuant to subdivi sion (b) shall be expended or encumbered in accordance with this cha pter no later than June 30 of the following fiscal year. ll local ag ency that has not met this requirement shall remit unspent SLESF mon eys to the Controller for deposit into the General Fund. (f) In the event that a county, a city , a city and county, or a qualifying special district does not comp ly with the requirements of this chapter to receive an SLESF allocati on, the Controller shall revert those funds to the Genera( Fund. L 300.6.2. (a) Except as required by paragra subdivision (b) of Section 30061, moneys Supplemental. Law Enforcement Services •'un entity shall be expended exclusively to p enforcement services. These moneys shall services, and shall not be used to supple law enforcement services provided by that pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision be used to supplement and not supplant fu existing services. (b) In the Counties of Los Angeles, Or the district attorney may, in correul,tatio county, determine a prorated share of the phs (1) , (2) , and (4) of allocated from a d (SIESF) to a recipient rovide front line law supplement existing nt any existing funding for entity. Moneys allocated (b) of Section 30061 shall nding by local agencies for ange, and San Diego only, n with city attorneys in the moneys received by the http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=gov&group= 30001-31000&file=3... 9/12/2002 MAY-14-04 FRI 08.10 AM FAX: PAGE 16 CA Codes (gov:30061-3U065) rage . ui r district attorney pursuant to this sectio attorneys in the county in each fiscal ye by those city attorneys of misdemeanor vi (c) In no event shall any moneys allot be expended by a recipient agency to fund (1) Administrative overhead costs in e recipient entity's SLESF allocation for t (2) The costs of any capital project o funded from moneys allocated pursuant to (b) of Section 30061 that does not direct enforcement services. (3) The costs of any capital project o funded from moneys allocated pursuant to (b) of 'Section-30061. (d) For purposes of subdivision (c), b apply: (1) A "recipient agency" or "recipient actually incurs the expenditures of SLESF to paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (4) of sub 30061. (2) Administrative overhead costs shal recipient entity, as defined in paragraph its SLESF allocation. (e) For purposes of this chapter, "fro services" and "front line municipal polic antigang, community crime prevention, and n to be allocated to city ar to fund the prosecution olations of state law. ated from the county's SLESF any of the following: xcess of 0.5 percent of hat year_ r construction project paragraph (3) of subdivision ly support front line law a. r construction projecL paragraph (4) of subdivision oth of the following shall entity" is that entity that funds allocated pursuant division (b) of Section 1 only be charged by the (1), up to 0.5 percent of nt line law enforcement e services" each include juvenile justice programs. 30063. .(a) .The Supplemental Law Enforcem ent Services Fund (SLESF) in each county or city is to be expended exclusively as required by this chapter. Moneys in that fund shall not be transferred to, or intermingled with, the moneys in any oche r fund in the county or city treasury, except that moneys may be trans ferred from the SLESF to the county's or city's general fund to th e extent necessary to facilitate the appropriation and expendit ure of those transferred moneys in the manner required by this cha pter. (b) Moneys in a SLESF may only be inve sted in safe and conservative investments in accordance wi th those standards of prudent investment applicable Co the inve stment of trust. moneys. The treasurer of the county and each city sha 11 provide a monthly SLESF investment report to either the police ch ief or the county sheriff and district attorney, as applicable. (c) Each year, at least 30 days prior to the date of the duly noticed public hearing required pursuant. to paragraph (1) of subdivision (c) of Section 30061, the cou my auditor and city treasurer shall detail and summarize allo cations fromthef}lnted y's sh or city's SLESF, as applicable, in a written , public report the Supplemental Law Enforcement Oversigh t Committee (SLEOC), the county board of supervisors, or the city council, as applicable, for the entirety of the immediately preceding fiscal year, and the county sheriff or police chief, as applicable. (d) A summary of the annual teports re quired in subdivision (c) shall be Submitted in a standardized form at to be developed by the Controller, in conjunction with the Calif ornia District Attorney's Association, California Police Chief's As sociation., California State Sheriff's Association, California Peace 0 fficer.'s Association, California County Auditor's Association, and California Municipal Treasurer's Association, by each SLEOC to the Controller on or before October 15, 2001, and each year thereafte r. The Controller shall. hdp://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=gov&group=30001-31000&file=3... 9/12/2002 MAY-14-04 FRI 08:11 AM CA Codes (gov:30061-30065) make a copy of the summarized reports ava Legislature, and the Legislative Analyst' (e) sy"March 1 of each year, the Legis shall report to the Legislature on the ty local law enforcement agencies in the pre to this chapter, and, to the extent feasi expenditures on law enforcement and publi (f) A county, a city, or a city and co the data required pursuant to subdivision report as required pursuant to clause (i) paragraph (4) of subdivision (b) of Secti to expend funds allocated pursuant to sub 30061 or interest earned pursuant to subd until that data and that report are submi chapter. (g) Notwithstanding subdivision (f), i Enforcement Oversight Committee (SLEOC) f the Controller required pursuant to subdi enforcement agency may submit its expendi Controller no later than 15 days after th subdivision (d). If the local law cnforc with ocher requirements in this chapter, funds allocated and interest earned pursu 30064. (a) There is in each county a Sup Oversight Committee (SLEOC), consisting o (1) One municipal police chief. (2) The county sheriff. (3) The district attorney. (4) The county's executive officer. (5) One city manager. (b) (1) The cities in each county shal selection committee for the purposes of a a municipal police chief to the SLEOC. E made by not less than a majority of all t having not less than a majority of the po in the county. For purposes of this para shall be determined on the basis of the m developed by the Department of Finance. (2) The SLEOC shall determine whether expended moneys received .from the Supplem Services Fund (SLESF) in compliance with purpose, the SLEOC shall at least annuall SLESF funds by city police departments, t district attorney, and shall make its ann to the public. FAX: ilable to the Governor, the s office. lative Analyst's office pes of expenditures made by vious fiscal year pursuant ble, on the effects of those c safety. unty that fails to submit (d) of this section or to of subparagraph (J) of on 30061 shall not continue division (b) of Section ivision (b) of this section tted as required by this f the Supplemental Law ails to transmit the data to vision (d), the local law ture data directly to the t date specified in ement agency has complied it may continue to expend ant to this chapter. plement.al Law Enforcement f five members as follows: PAGE 17 rage o of 1 organize as a city ppointing a city manager and ach appointment shall be he cities in the county pulation of all the cities graph, population figures ost recent census data recipient entities have ental Law Enforcement this chapter. For this y review the expenditure of he county sheriff, and the ual review report available 30065. In no event shall this chapter be construed to affect in any manner the public safety service allocati ons required by Chapter 6.5 (commencing with Section 30051). Or 7.444. http://www_leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section. gov&group-30001-31000&file=3... 9/12/2002 -1 17 AGENDA ITEM 55/ !o June 3, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members o the City Council FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer SUBJECT: Traffic Report — Intersection of Ramona Expressway and Eagle Drive RECOMMENDATION: By motion: 1) adopt traffic report dated May 3, 2004 prepared by R.K. Engineering Group for the intersection of Ramona Expressway and Eagle Drive; and 2) authorize implementation of recommendations as presented in the report by inclusion of adequate fund in Fiscal Year 2004-05 budget. BACKGROUND: The City Council at a regular meeting directed staff to conduct a traffic study and traffic signal warrant analysis for the intersection of Ramona Expressway and Eagle Drive. Based on the attached traffic engineer's recommendations, City should consider the installation of a traffic signal in one to two years, as well as intersection widening and signing and re -striping to enhance the traffic circulation in this general area. As part of the Fiscal Year 2004-05 budget staff is requesting the appropriation of $151,000 for the implementation of this traffic study. This is an estimate and upon completion of design, staff will update this cost as needed. JUSTIFICATION: Enhance and improve safety and reduce accident rates. Page 1 of 2 Appr City Manager: Finance Director: BUDGETARY IMPACT: $151,000 to the City's Traffic Mitigation fund to offset the cost of the proposed intersection improvements and installation of the traffic signal at Ramona Expressway and Eagle Drive; appropriation included in the upcoming Fiscal Year 2004-05 budget request. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Traffic Study prepared by R.K. Engineering Group, Inc., dated May 3, 2004 Page 2 of 2 RI( engineering group, inc. transportation planning • traffic engineering acoustical / air quality studies LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: CITY OF SAN JACINTO DATE: May 3, 2004 C/O TRI-LAKE CONSULTANTS, INC. JOB NO.: 0328-04-02 170 Wilkerson Avenue, Suite D SUBJECT: Eagle Road at Ramona Expressway Perris, CA 92570-2200 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis ATTN: Mr. Habib Motlagh _ WE ARE FORWARDING: NUMBER OF COPIES 2 1 SENT FOR YOUR Approval Signature X Use File By Messenger By Blueprinter By Mail X By Fedex DESCRIPTION Bound copies of report for your use Unbound report for your reproduction purposes STATUS PLEASE NOTE Preliminary Revisions Revised Additions Approved Omissions Released Corrections REMARKS: Enclosed is the traffic signal warrant analysis for the subject intersection. Based upon the study, a traffic signal is warranted at the intersection. It would be desirable to complete the street improvements on Eagle Road in conjunction with the traffic signal installation. Please call (949) 474-0809 if you have any questions. Robert Kahn, P.E. Principal RK2352TB.xls 20201 s.w. birch street, suite 250 newport beach, california 92660 tel 949.474.0809 fax 949.474.0902 http://www.rkengineer.com EAGLE ROAD AT RAMONA EXPRESSWAY TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS San Jancinto, California RI( engineering group, inc. RK engineering group, inc. May 3, 2004 Mr. Habib Motlagh CITY OF SAN JACINTO do TRI-LAKE CONSULTANTS, INC. 170 Wilkerson Avenue, Suite D Perris, CA 92570-2200 transportation planning • traffic engineering acoustical / air quality studies Subject: Eagle Road at Ramona Expressway Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Dear Mr. Motlagh: Introduction RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) is pleased to provide City of San Jacinto the Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis for the intersection of Eagle Road and Ramona Expressway in the City of San Jacinto. The analysis location is shown in Exhibit A. The purpose of this analysis is to develop recommendations to further improve the current operations at the intersection. The analysis will determine if a traffic signal is warranted at the intersection of Eagle Road and Ramona Expressway based upon existing conditions. Also, a review of the accidents has been conducted for this intersection and recommended improvements are suggested in the recommendations section of this report. Existing Conditions Exhibit B illustrates the existing geometric conditions at the intersection of Eagle Road at Ramona Expressway. At the study area intersection, Ramona Expressway is a two-lane undivided roadway and Eagle Road is a two-lane undivided local street. At the intersection, the Eagle Road approaches are stop controlled and the Ramona Expressway approaches are uncontrolled. The posted speed limit on Ramona Expressway is 55 miles per hour. Existing traffic volumes for the study area intersection are shown in Exhibit C. The traffic count sheets are included in Appendix A. Hourly approach traffic counts are tabulated in Table 1. An operational analysis was done on the existing two-way stop controlled intersection and the intersection is Level of Service F. The traffic signal will greatly improve the level of service at the intersection. 20201 s.w. birch street, suite 250 newport beach. caliiornia 92660 tel 949.474.0t509 tax 9,19.474.0902 Accident reports were provided by the San Jacinto Police Department (see Appendix B). These statistics are summarized and presented in Table 2, based upon the following formula: Accidents per No. of Accidents*32.877 Million Vehicles= ADT*No. of Months According to the San Jacinto Police Department records, there has been one (1) accident near this intersection during Year 2003 and one (1) accident reported during Year 2002. As shown in Table 2, the calculated accident rate for the study intersection is lower than the expected rate for similar types of intersections. Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis The intersection of Eagle Road at Ramona Expressway has been evaluated for a traffic signal using Caltrans' eleven (11) traffic signal warrants criteria. The following warrant criteria are applicable for the existing traffic condition: Warrant No. Description Results 1 Minimum Vehicle Volume 80% Warranted1 2 Interruption of Continuous Traffic Warranted 3 Minimum Pedestrian Volume Not Warranted 4 School Crossings Not Applicable 6 Accident Experience Not Warranted 7 Systems Not Warranted 8 Combination of Warrants Warranted 9 4-Hour Volume Warranted 10 Peak Hour Delay Not Warranted 11 Peak Hour Volume Warranted Since the speed limit on Ramona Expressway is 55 miles per hour, the intersection of Eagle Road and Ramona Expressway has been evaluated using rural area condition criteria. The intersection of Eagle Road and Ramona Expressway currently meets four (4) of the warrants for a traffic signal based on the Caltrans warrant analysis. Warrant 1 nearly met the 100% criteria with existing traffic volumes failing to meet the requirements by only three (3) to four (4) vehicles. Warrant 8, however, does become satisfied because both the minimum vehicle volume and the interruption of continuous traffic meet the 80% ' Warrant 1 was nearly met (3 to 4 vehicles per hour on the minor street). RK: wg/RK2352.doc 2 JN:0328-04-02 threshold stipulated by the warrant analysis. Warrant 10, which is the Peak Hour Delay warrant, will most likely be satisfied in a short period of time. With existing conditions operating at a Level of Service F, installing a traffic signal at the study area intersection will improve the level of service. Therefore, based upon the four (4) warrants that are currently met and one (1) that will be met in approximately one year, it is our recommendation that a traffic signal is warranted at this location. Conclusions Based upon the analysis, the intersection of Eagle Road at Ramona Expressway currently meets four (4) warrants for a traffic signal based upon existing conditions. However, this intersection is projected to meet six (6) warrants in approximately one year. RK would recommend that the City implement a traffic signal at this location in the next one to two years as traffic volumes increase. Recommendations The following recommendations are suggested for this intersection: 1. The City should consider installing a traffic signal in one to two years, as traffic increases at this intersection. 2. The southwest corner of Eagle Road at Ramona Expressway should be widened to provide a northbound left turn lane. 3. Eagle Road north and south of Ramona Expressway should be restriped to allow for one left turn lane and one shared, thru-right lane. A summary of the recommended improvements is shown in Exhibit D. RK appreciates this opportunity to work with City of San Jacinto on this project. If you have any questions regarding this study, please call me at (949) 474-0809. Sincerely, RK ENGINEERING Robert Kahn, P.E. Principal Attachments /co ESSIO Z 5 rn * EXP.12/31/05 * filin ha. N qTF OF C A��Fes shy • 614•7(- DeLisa Billups Assistant Engineer Exhibits Legend: • = Study Area Intersection Exhibit A Location Map 0328-04-02 (ExA) EAGLE RD. AT RAMONA EXWY. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS. San Jacinto, California Ea! engineering group, inc. w w dO.LS STOP LEGEND: i = STOP SIGN (R-1) 0328-04-02 (ExB) EAGLE RD. AT RAMONA EXWY. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS, San Jacinto, California 0 W J C7 W Exhibit B Existing Conditions I O 2 J c d N V w w aLo w coLO fY I - RI( engineering group, inc. Exhibit C Existing Traffic Volumes and Speeds Legend: • = Study Area Intersection 15,506 = 2-Way ADT --17861I = I -Way ADT Era engineering group, inc. 0328-04-02(ExC) EAGLE RD. AT RAMONA EXWY. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS, San Jacinto, California Exhibit D Circulation Recommendations Remove existing stop signs and related advance warning signs when the traffic signal is installed. rx Restripe to provide left turn lane. Widen Eagle Rd. to provide left tum lane. Legend: = Traffic Signal T = Stop Sign 0328-04-02 (ExD) 0 W Restripe to provide left tum lane. w W EAGLE RD. AT RAMONA EXWY. TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS, San Jacinto, California w w F Install traffic signal. R1( engineering group, inc. 2 cc Tables TABLE 1 Hourly Traffic Counts Eagle Road at Ramona Expressway End Time NB SB Subtotal NB + SB EB WB Subtotal EB + WB Grand Total 1:00 AM 3 7 10 106 105 211 221 2:00 AM 0 2 2 57 76 133 135 3:00 AM 3 4 7 41 66 107 114 4:00 AM 5 9 14 39 111 150 164 5:00 AM 22 10 32 24 172 196 228 6:00 AM 29 14 43 66 373 439 482 7:00 AM 38 38 76 251 597 848 924 8:00 AM 71 117 188 412 716 1,128 1,316 9:00 AM 58 95 153 334 540 874 1,027 10:00 AM 40 80 120 292 397 689 809 11:00 AM 33 62 95 271 365 636 731 12 NOON 32 102 134 277 393 670 804 1:00 PM 39 125 164 319 377 696 860 2:00 PM 36 95 131 359 388 747 878 3:00 PM 73 141 214 363 465 828 1,042 4:00 PM 65 110 175 495 483 978 1,153 5:00 PM 43 132 175 586 482 1,068 1,243 6:00 PM 47 140 187 621 409 1,030 1,217 7:00 PM 42 101 143 660 360 1,020 1,163 8:00 PM 33 93 126 426 309 735 861 9:00 PM 39 59 98 333 210 543 641 10:00 PM 13 109 122 340 185 525 647 11:00 PM 12 42 54 218 157 375 429 12:00 AM 10 6 16 141 125 266 282 TOTAL 786 1,693 2,479 7,031 7,861 14,892 17,371 is tkcablesbk2300\RK2352TB.xls IN •0328-04-02 TABLE 2 Traffic Accident Rate Calculations Intersection Number of Accidents Accident Rate Expected Accident Rate2 Year 2002 Year 2003 Total Daily Eagle Road (NS) at: • Ramona Expressway (EW) 1 1 2 17,264 0.16 0.33/0.343 Accidents per million vehicles = (number of accidents x 32,877) + (ADT x number of months). 2 Based upon CALTRANS average intersection with similar conditions. 3 Expected rural/suburban accident rates. rvktablesvk2300\RK2352 F&.xls iaj,m,c n4 n, Appendices Appendix A Average Daily Traffic Volumes Average Daily Traffic Volumes Prepared by: Southland Car Counters Volumes for: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 City: San Jacinto Project #: 04-3172-001 Location: Eagle Rd n/o Ramona Exwy. AM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB 12:00-12:15 4 1 12:00-12:15 14 20 12:15-12:30 2 3 12:15-12:30 15 32 12:30-12:45 1 1 12:30-12:45 29 42 12:45-1:00 3 10 2 7 17 12:45-1:00 36 94 31 125 219 1:00-1:15 2 0 1:00-1:15 27 30 1:15-1:30 1 0 1:15-1:30 32 24 1:30-1:45 2 1 1:30-1:45 23 17 1:45-2:00 0 5 1 2 7 1:45-2:00 26 108 24 95 203 2:00-2:15 1 1 2:00-2:15 16 27 2:15-2:30 0 0 2:15-2:30 24 31 2:30-2:45 0 0 2:30-2:45 21 38 2:45-3:00 1 2 3 4 6 2:45-3:00 30 91 45 141 232 3:00-3:15 2 1 3:00-3:15 31 21 3:15-3:30 0 1 3:15-3:30 31 28 3:30-3:45 1 3 3:30-3:45 27 27 . 3:45-4:00 4 7 4 9 16 3:45-4:00 40 129 34 110 239 4:00-4:15 1 1 4:00-4:15 29 38 4:15-4:30 0 2 4:15-4:30 29 50 4:30-4:45 0 1 4:30-4:45 17 21 4:45-5:00 1 2 6 10 12 4:45-5:00 33 108 23 132 240 5:00-5:15 3 4 5:00-5:15 25 33 5:15-5:30 3 3 5:15-5:30 35 33 5:30-5:45 1 2 5:30-5:45 31 30 5:45-6:00 4 11 5 14 25 5:45-6:00 39 130 44 140 .-270 6:00-6:15 0 9 6:00-6:15 26 38 6:15-6:30 3 4 6:15-6:30 29 18 6:30-6:45 4 12 6:30-6:45 37 24 6:45-7:00 3 10 13 38 48 6:45-7:00 30 122 21 101 223 7:00-7:15 9 18 7:00-7:15 51 33 7:15-7:30 20 26 7:15-7:30 54 23 7:30-7:45 25 46 7:30-7:45 24 21 7:45-8:00 26 80 27 117 197 7:45-8:00 15 144 16 93 237 8:00-8:15 24 25 8:00-8:15 22 18 8:15-8:30 34 24 8:15-8:30 16 11 8:30-8:45 25 22 8:30-8:45 14 15 8:45-9:00 20 103 24 95 198 8:45-9:00 20 72 15 59 131 9:00-9:15 27 28 9:00-9:15 18 10 - 9:15-9:30 34 20 9:15-9:30 20 27 9:30-9:45 24 15 9:30-9:45 22 21 9:45-10:00 9 94 17 80 174 9:45-10:00 11 71 51 109 180 10:00-10:15 0 0 10:00-10:15 10 24 10:15-10:30 20 17 10:15-10:30 10 5 10:30-10:45 15 20 10:30-10:45 6 9 10:45-11:00 20 55 25 62 117 10:45-11:00 5 31 4 42 73 11:00-11:15 36 30 11:00-11:15 5 0 11:15-11:30 23 33 11:15-11:30 2 2 11:30-11:45 21 20 11:30-11:45 5 1 11:45-12:00 12 92 19 102 194 11:45-12:00 3 15 3 6 21 Total Vol. 471 540 0 0 1011 1115 1153 0 0 2268 Daily Totals 15B6 1693 0 0 3279 Average Daily Traffic Volumes Prepared by: Southland Car Counters Volumes for: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 Oty: San Jacinto Project #: 04-3172-002 Location: Ramona Expy e/o Eagle Rd AM Period NE $S ED WB _Pft eijQcl NI3 SD EQ W 12:00-12:15 27 24 12:00-12:15 105 80 12:15-12:30 24 28 12:15-12:30 114 98 12:30-12:45 27 29 12:30-12:45 103 103 12:45-1:00 34 112 24 105 217 12:45-1:00 74 396 96 377 773 1:00-1:15 13 24 1:00-1:15 121 107 1:15-1:30 18 23 1:15-1:30 96 109 1:30-1:45 16 16 1:30-1:45 87 80 1:45-2:00 10 57 13 76 133 1:45-2:00 112 416 92 388 804 2:00-2:15 13 14 2:00-2:15 114 111 2:15-2:30 16 21 2:15-2:30 97 123 2:30-2:45 4 11 2:30-2:45 147 133 2:45-3:00 10 43 20 66 109 2:45-3:00 120 478 98 465 943 3:00-3:15 9 14 3:00-3:15 123 121 3:15-3:30 12 31 3:15-3:30 137 123 3:30-3:45 10 26 3:30-3:45 140 140 3:45-4:00 7 38 40 111 149 3:45-4:00 165 565 99 483 1048 4:00-4:15 4 34 4:00-4:15 163 129 4:15-4:30 9 30 4:15-4:30 161 116 4:30-4:45 8 54 4:30-4:45 162 124 4:45-5:00 7 28 54 172 200 4:45-5:00 174 660 113 482 1142 5:00-5:15 10 71 5:00-5:15 168 108 5:15-5:30 14 82 5:15-5:30 160 122 5:30-5:45 21 103 5:30-5:45 161 101 5:45-6:00 25 70 117 373 443 5:45-6:00 171 660 78 409 1069 6:00-6:15 35 127 6:00-6:15 178 95 6:15-6:30 56 155 6:15-6:30 172 87 6:30-6:45 59 171 6:30-6:45 129 78 6:45-7:00 101 251 144 597 848 6:45-7:00 170 649 100 360 1009 7:00-7:15 117 195 7:00-7:15 130 98 7:15-7:30 110 186 7:15-7:30 122 81 7:30-7:45 116 174 7:30-7:45 98 64 7:45-8:00 93 436 161 716 1152 7:45-8:00 92 442 66 309 751 8:00-8:15 103 148 8:00-8:15 74 55 8:15-8:30 80 150 8:15-B:30 86 60 8:30-8:45 86 115 8:30-8:45 87 34 8:45-9:00 70 339 127 540 879 8:45-9:00 86 333 61 210 543 9:00-9:15 75 133 9:00-9:15 88 40 9:15-9:30 62 75 9:15-9:30 75 51 9:30-9:45 69 93 9:30-9:45 102 50 9:45-10:00 79 285 96 397 682 9:45-10:00 94 359 44 185 544 10:00-10:15 73 87 10:0D-10:15 76 50 10:15-10:30 63 88 10:15-10:30 60 38 10:30-10:45 91 94 10:30-10:45 50 30 10:45-11:00 82 309 96 365 674 10:45-11:00 50 236 39 157 393 11:00-11:15 94 112 11:00-11:15 35 31 11:15-11:30 88 80 11:15-11:30 39 35 11:30-11:45 84 103 11:30-11:45 27 34 11:45-12:00 76 342 98 393 735 11:45-12:00 40 141 25 125 266 Total Vol. 0 0 2310 3911 6221 0 0 5335 3950 9285 Daily Totals 0 0 7645 7861 15506 Volumes for: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 Location: Eagle Rd s/o Ramona Exwy. AM Period NB SB EB Average Daily Traffic Volumes Prepared by: Southland Car Counters City: San Jacinto Project #: 04-3172-003 12:00-12:15 0 2 12:00-12:15 8 9 12:15-12:30 3 3 12:15-12:30 10 12 12:30-12:45 0 0 12:30-12:45 12 8 12:45-1:00 0 3 0 5 8 12:45-1:00 9 39 9 38 77 1:00-1:15 0 2 1:00-1:15 9 13 1:15-1:30 0 3 1:15-1:30 9 15 1:30-1:45 0 1 1:30-1:45 8 8 1:45-2:00 0 0 1 7 7 1:45-2:00 10 36 9 45 81 2:00-2:15 1 2 2:00-2:15 13 15 2:15-2:30 0 0 2:15-2:30 23 20 2:30-2:45 0 3 2:30-2:45 24 20 2:45-3:00 2 3 0 5 8 2:45-3:00 13 73 19 74 147 3:00-3:15 0 3 3:00-3:15 18 15 3:15-3:30 2 1 3:15-3:30 11 18 3:30-3:45 1 2 3:30-3:45 19 14 3:45-4:00 2 5 0 6 11 3:45-4:00 17 65 10 57 122 4:00-4:15 1 0 4:00-4:15 12 21 4:15-4:30 4 0 4:15-4:30 17 21 4:30-4:45 8 2 4:30-4:45 6 9 4:45-5:00 9 22 0 2 24 4:45-5:00 8 43 13 64 107 5:00-5:15 6 0 5:00-5:15 10 17 5:15-5:30 5 1 5:15-5:30 17 16 5:30-5:45 10 3 5:30-5:45 11 15 5:45-6:00 8 29 3 7 36 5:45-6:00 9 47 19 67 114 6:00-6:15 8 4 6:00-6:15 6 12 6:15-6:30 5 3 6:15-6:30 10 20 6:30-6:45 7 4 6:30-6:45 8 13 6:45-7:00 18 38 13 24 62 6:45-7:00 18 42 15 60 102 7:00-7:15 20 36 7:00-7:15 16 15 7:15-7:30 21 31 7:15-7:30 6 6 7:30-7:45 20 11 7:30-7:45 6 11 7:45-8:00 10 71 14 92 163 7:45-8:00 5 33 13 45 78 8:00-8:15 21 16 8:00-8:15 7 8 8:15-8:30 17 9 8:15-8:30 12 14 8:30-8:45 13 11 8:30-8:45 8 13 8:45-9:00 7 58 12 48 106 8:45-9:00 12 39 11 46 85 9:00-9:15 • 9 6 9:00-9:15 4 12 9:15-9:30 7 7 9:15-9:30 3 11 9:30-9:45 12 5 9:30-9:45 6 9 9:45-10:00 12 40 8 26 66 9:45-10:00 0 13 4 36 49 10:00-10:15 3 7 10:00-10:15 4 6 10:15-10:30 9 6 10:15-10:30 5 2 10:30-10:45 8 11 10:30-10:45 2 2 10:45-11:00 13 33 6 30 63 10:45-11:00 1 12 3 13 25 11:00-11:15 9 6 11:00-11:15 0 4 11:15-11:30 6 10 11:15-11:30 2 6 11:30-11:45 8 6 11:30-11:45 8 3 11:45-12:00 9 32 8 30 62 11:45-12:00 0 10 2 15 25 Total Vol. 334 282 0 0 616 452 560 0 0 1012 Daily Totals 786 842 0 0 1628 Average Daily Traffic Volumes Prepared by: Southland Car Counters Volumes for: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 City: San Jacinto Project #: 04-3172-004 Location: Ramona Expy w/o Eagle Rd AM Pcrizi tthi 53 EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB 12:00-12:15 29 25 12:00-12:15 77 100 12:15-12:30 21 32 12:15-12:30 88 127 12:30-12:45 28 32 12:30-12:45 91 122 12:45-1:00 28 106 29 116 224 12:45-1:00 63 319 109 458 777 1:00-1:15 15 22 1:00-1:15 102 131 1:15-1:30 19 26 1:15-1:30 90 132 1:30-1:45 14 14 1:30-1:45 70 103 1:45-2:00 9 57 14 76 133 1:45-2:00 97 359 110 476 835 2:00-2:15 12 18 2:00-2:15 93 128 2:15-2:30 17 18 2:15-2:30 75 142 2:30-2:45 2 11 2:30-2:45 104 150 2:45-3:00 10 41 23 70 111 2:45-3:00 91 363 120 540 903 3:00-3:15 9 20 3:00-3:15 101 126 3:15-3:30 10 29 3:15-3:30 135 136 3:30-3:45 12 32 3:30-3:45 111 156 3:45-4:00 8 39 41 122 161 3:45-4:00 148 495 126 544 1039 4:00-4:15 3 35 4:00-4:15 150 142 4:15-4:30 9 42 4:15-4:30 128 137 4:30-4:45 7 53 4:30-4:45 158 138 4:45-5:00 5 24 65 195 219 4:45-5:00 150 586 122 539 1125 5:00-5:15 8 77 5:00-5:15 160 119 5:15-5:30 15 89 5:15-5:30 155 123 5:30-5:45 18 109 5:30-5:45 146 120 5:45-6:00 25 66 124 399 465 5:45.6:00 160 621 101 463 1084 6:00-6:15 31 134 6:00-6:15 172 85 6:15-6:30 56 153 6:15-6:30 190 112 6:30-6:45 68 181 6:30-6:45 142 76 6:45-7:00 96 251 162 630 881 6:45-7:00 156 660 100 373 1033 7:00-7:15 111 176 7:00-7:15 126 87 7:15-7:30 93 185 7:15-7:30 114 84 7:30-7:45 118 172 7:30-7:45 110 73 7:45-8:00 90 412 175 708 1120 7:45-8:00 76 426 67 311 737 8:00-8:15 95 148 8:00-8:15 74 62 8:15-8:30 87 135 8:15-8:30 81 58 8:30-8:45 77 129 13:30-8:45 91 43 8:45-9:00 75 334 144 556 890 8:45-9:00 87 333 59 222 555 9:00-9:15 65 128 9:00-9:15 81 44 9:15-9:30 69 84 9:15-9:30 86 49 9:30-9:45 67 96 9:30-9:45 86 55 9:45-10:00 91 292 103 411 703 9:45-10:00 87 340 62 210 550 10:00-10:15 75 96 10:00-10:15 66 57 10:15-10:30 47 94 10:15-10:30 63 37 10:30-10:45 83 95 10:30-10:45 46 35 10:45-11:00 66 271 107 392 663 10:45-11:00 43 218 34 163 381 11:00-11:15 68 122 11:00-11:15 37 34 11:15-11:30 77 88 11:15-11:30 36 40 11:30-11:45 68 112 11:30-11:45 29 28 11:45-12:00 64 277 114 436 713 11:45-12:00 39 141 30 132 273 Total Vol. 0 0 2170 4113 6283 Daily Totals 0 0 0 4861 4431 9292 0 7031 8544 15575 Appendix B Accident Data #406514a Collisions and Victims by Year Within 200 Feet of the Intersecetion of Ramona Expressway & Eagle City of San Jacinto - Riverside County Total Fatal I Collisions Collision Year;' ai •7°' 2002 - Available 2003 Injury PDO Victirns r vict6ns Killed injured 2002 i -1:'' 1 0 0 i 0 0 2003 1 0 1 0 0 2 TOTALS " 2 0 1 1 0 2 B Y• 06-APR-04 c• Total Could: 2 •• -c.-.* Ines• - a•/vr. • eivKU. AUV3 - [;ULUSIUNS WII tun 2IJU I-ttI Ul• I Nt IN I tIOC I1UN Ut- RAMONA EXPWY & EAGLE IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, RIVERSIDE COUNTY refinery Rd RAMONA EXPWY Distance (10 50 Direction E Seconder). Rd EAGLE RD NCIC 3314 Stale Hwy? N Route Posfin a Prefix. PosTrm7e is, SAN JACINTO County RIVERSIDESide of Hwy Poprc'afisn 4 P.p! Dist 7T0 Gem 020 Type l7J+Tiaea brit Badge;O50 Collision Dale 20020110 Tune iBOD Dal• WED Pnmary C°LFsrd, Facia, NOT STATED Waitron CaNsipn Typr 11IT OBJECT Sererr,'y PDO tf Kltfeo 0 # Woe:terl CLOMP( Weather? Rdwy Surface WET Riley Card ND VNUSL CNO R Injured 0 Tee -Away? V Frecess A.le 20820627 Ye and Run M ,for Ve-h krvot red Wi'h FIKEO 0BJ ' Cpnd2 Spec Coed U f VOMir'P DAYLIGHT Ptd Aciiar COT Der FNCTNG Loc Type Raawee PARTY HYPOD. VICTIM K:FO Patti, Type Age Sex Race Setae1' 1 Sobrrely2 Mors Pie Coll ( SW Veh £HP Vail Mafia Year Sp feta OAF1 Wkf OAF2 Se At ro a Role Ext of 1rj Aqe Sex Seai Pas •Seier_y eip �er� .DRVR 19 F HNBD OET TURN E A 0000 FORD 2000 - - N G nary Rd RAMORA EXPWY Distance (fr) I Oireclion Secondary Rd EAGLE AV /IClC Slate Hwy? N Roule PortniAo Pral(x Pasfneie --ty SAN JACINTO County RIVERSIDE Poprla6an 4 ftPf mrd 112 Beat 02D Type 3314 Sat Oki $eSrde of Hwy nary Collision Factor R.O-W AUTO Ywfalkm 21802A Coktion Sedge 4080 Collision bele 20030123 Tone 1730 Day 011111 s1 Type BROADSIDE Sev�ly INJURY a Rleed 0 4 Peered 2 Tow Away> Y Process Cola 20030519 Lie and Rt+.i adCLEAR Wealter2 RdwySurface DRY RdryCone NO UNUSL CND RdwyCmW2 Spec Coed 0 Lie Motor Veit Involved PM, EIV ON OTHER RD Lighting DARK -ST LTI POO AcloOn Call Der FNCTNG Loc Type Rampgol PARTY INFO °and• 2 ,40e Sec Rene Sobdetel Sobriely2 Wye Pie Colf ar SW Yee CUP Vet Make Year Sp kifa F DRVR 34 M W HNBD LFTTURN N 0 0000 CHEVR2001 • - DRVR 31 M H HNBD PROC ST E A 0000 FORD 1993 - - case Llstreg Page 1 VICTIM fHFO OAF, t'wl "Dan Sakti Equfp Role Erf DIM Ale Sex Seal Pba Safety Equip Ejected - G - DRVR COW PN 32 M 1 G • 0 PASS COMP PN 090 . 3 G • 0 TOIBJ COunl. 2 gram - 2002 - AVAIL 2803 - COLUSIONS OVITIN 4 200 FEET OF THE INTERSECTION OF RAMONA EXPWY 8 EAGLE IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, RIVERSIDE COUNTY Gl SAH d ty Rd RAMONA VCWy � tance f) SO Oi uct E Secondary Rd EAGLE RD rime GbV.sron °�� RIVERSIDE DlDratil6 Baal O I.e Neeli NOTSTATEO CaR T Case Listing Page 1 NCIC3314 SfaleHoy f v Popnlasaa 4 R ' CLOUDY H�eefho�9 V' 1va Type HITOB•IECT 28 T [btTraasOiaf Afic and Run Rdrry Surface Raky Caul;+only POO Motor Pah hvohsd I.i 9n REED OBJ WETREEDDAAYLIGHT NO WPe8 ei AJion mad T .•- A DRVR primary Rd RAMONA E?Cp11tY le I ;ay 5Ati JACIIJTO Co.,n y RIVERSIDE =einaryCollision Factor R-O-VVAUTO 4aalhert CLEAR end Run aril' Type Asa Set F DRVR 34 Ig DRVR 3i M WlaathaY! Rdiey Condt NO Wan CHO Mole. Veh Irwdl+edWdh MY OM OTHER RD Y LighSnk OARK-STLTS Rod Action PARTY INFO lAofre Pm Cell Olt - Vie 1HP Val li Yasr OAF Vi f F. - 2 LFTTURN E A 0000 RD .;,: N Direction 4Secondary Rd EAGLE AV ROC 3314 State Hwy? PopulationTyPe Vialetroa 21902A Collision Type ROADSIDE e+erkyINJURY, Dist Rda y Son Race SoWiefyi Sohrief 2 PARTYINFO So v W a Pee C Ob.SW Veh CHP Veh Mahe NNLFT N D 0000 CHEY� H HBO PROCST E A 0000 FORD Rune Poster* Pw4r Po rm1e See of MIt7 Barka 4052 Colfsloo note 20020110 Tim¢ 1000 WY y0E0 0t0ited 0 fl !rioted 0 Tow Away? Y P,sriess Doe 20020621 Wirer Cond2 Spsc Caw 0 Coed De. FNCTNG Lon Type, Psnte00 O 4C7t0tZNFO Rife"- Ettf of Ser SBef Poe Sekl N R ,es k Posrmiie Pie & Poem& Badge 4600 ColAtiaa Dote 20020123 !t Jfaed 0 P L*wer 2 Tan•Away'' Y Rdwy Cond2 dHvO• limo 1T30 Day THU Process Date 20030519 Spec Cond 0 Cal Der FNCTNG Loc Type RamP4ct VICTIM NFO Rote Ern of h Ski SealPos Safe! DRVR COMP PM 32 1J -PASS COMP PH 910 - 1 G • 3 G • 0 0 • #400514a Collisions and Victims by Year Within 200 Feet of the Intersecetion of Ramona Expressway & Eagle City of San Jacinto Riverside County 2002 • Available 2003 Total Fetal Injury i CollIalons _J 2002 I 1 2003 1 TOTALS 0 0 0 1 a r 1 0 0 0 . 0 2 i 0 2 06•APR-04 Appendix C Caltrans Warrants Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-7 T-1996 Figure 9-1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS 02 nV CALC 0 DATE � I -1- (r 3 O DIST CO RTE KPM CHK % a �- DATE �i ! 1' , j 'n Major St: 1 ` b v,%..,....v,,, kG 1,,.., NCritical Approach Speed C 1- _ y, , Minor Si: 6- c, M \ .._ 'A. Critical Approach Speed km/h Critical speed of major street traffic > 64-km/h In built up area at isolated community of < 10,000 pop. El or RURAL (R) ❑ URBAN (U) WARRANT 1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) q3.1 U R APPROACH LANES Both Apprchs. Major Street Highest Apprch. Minor Street p 500 (400) 150 (120) 350 ( 2 or more 600 (480) 200 (160) 420 (336) 140 (112) 100% SATISFIED YES ❑ NO f 80% SATISFIED YES 51 NO ❑ - e A/n �� / 1-AI/ . J Z-3P�3 -y PA-s�/-t3Ph'p Hour It1.7 { 44_ Vic l oy Io°tb 11-r t'11 I1� mit lOjz, lyv (C Zp ►c.. I WARRANT 2 - Interruption of Continuous Traffic 100% SATISFIED YES tR NO ❑ 80% SATISFIED YES Ca NO ❑ MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS) U R APPROACH LANES Both Apprchs. Major Street Highest Apprch. Minor Street 750 (600) 75 (60) (4 ( 2 or more 900 (720) 100 _ (so) 630 (5041. 70 (56) • pI `/+i`I/' /'.—`/, • Hour I r' LP. lob /32 WARRANT 3 - Minimum Pedestrian Volume "i o} 100%o SATISFIED YES ❑ NO If Cc v. C REQUIREMENT FULFILLED Pedestrian volume crossing the major street is 100 or more for each of any four hours or is 190 or more during any one hour AND Yes No ■ ■ There are less than 60 gaps per hour In the major street traf- fic stream of adequate length tor pedestrians to cross. AND Yes No • IN The nearest traffic signal along the major street is greater than 90 m• AND Yes ❑ No ❑ The new traffic signal will not seriously disrupt progressive traffic flow on the major street. Yes ❑ No ■ The satisfaction of a warrant Is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown. 8 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING Traffic Manual 396 Figure 9-2 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS 'ARRANT 4 - School Areas 'ARRANT 5 - Progressive Movement •Not Applicable Et See School Protection Warrants Sheet ❑ SATISFIED YES ❑ NO MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS > 300 m DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL FULFILLED N m, S m, E I 1'1,14.- W L Cs ti 1 ON ONE WAY ISOLATED STREETS OR STREETS WITH ONE WAY TRAFFIC SIGNIFICANCE AND ADJACENT SIGNALS ARE SO FAR APART THAT NECESSARY PLATOONING & SPEED CONTROL WOULD BE LOST ON 2-WAY STREETS WHERE ADJACENT SIGNALS DO NOT PROVIDE NECESSARY PLATOONING AND SPEED CONTROL PROPOSED SIGNALS COULD CONSTITUTE A PROGRESSIVE SIGNAL SYSTEM YES gi NO ❑ !ARRANT 6 - Accident Experience SATISFIED YES ❑ NO va, REQUIREMENTS WARRANT ,,/ FULFILLED ONE WARRANT SATISFIED 80% WARRANT 1 - MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME OR WARRANT 2 - INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC — YES ■ NO ■ SIGNAL WILL NOT SERIOUSLY DISRUPT PROGRESSIVE TRAFFIC FLOW • • ADEQUATE TRIAL OF LESS RESTRICTIVE REMEDIES HAS FAILED TO REDUCE ACCIDENT FREQUENCY ■ • ACC. WITHIN A 12 MONTH PERIOD SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORR. & INVOLVING INJURY OR >_ $500 DAMAGE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT r NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS ❑ 5 OR MORE I l f t L', _„.„ k- !ARRANT 7 - Systems Warrant SATISFIED YES ❑ NO EMI MINIMUM VOLUME REQUIREMENT ENTERING VOLUMES - ALL APPROACHES FULFILLED 1000 VEH/HR DURING TYPICAL WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR 1 3 I (C) VEH/HR OR DURING EACH OF ANY 5 HRS. OF A SAT. AND/OR SUN. VEH/HR YES NO ❑ CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJOR ROUTES MAJOR ST. MINOR ST. HWY. SYSTEM SERVING AS PRINCIPLE NETWORK FOR THROUGH TRAFFIC RURAL OR SUBURBAN HWY OUTSIDE OF, ENTERING, OR TRAVERSING A CITY e_ -q�_ APPEARS AS MAJOR ROUTE ON AN OFFICIAL PLAN ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS MET, BOTH STREETS Ma he satisfaction of a warrant Is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other vidence of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown. Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-g Figure 9-3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS WARRANT 8 - Combination of Warrants 7-1996 SATISFIED YES [ NO ❑ REQUIREMENT WARRANT .1 FULFILLED TWO WARRANTS SATISFIED 80% 1. MINIMUM VEHICULAR VOLUME 1/ YES Fil NO ❑ 2. INTERRUPTION OF CONTINUOUS TRAFFIC ✓ WARRANT 9 - Four Hour Volume roach Lanes One SATISFIED* YES Ed NO El more N' I pp/y'5 / Hour Both Approaches - Major Street 1../ 661.(o 724 lbLi( 1 O 3 Highest Approaches - Minor Street ✓ j ZS lit ‘31-- 1k0� Refer to Figure 9-6 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-7 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. WARRANT 10 - Peak Hour Delay (ALL PARTS MUST BE SATISFIED) 1. The total delay experienced for traffic on one minor street approach controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle -hours for a one -lane approach and five vehicle -hours for a two-lane approach. AND 2. The volume on the same minor street approach equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vph for two moving lanes• AND 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more approaches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches. WARRANT 11 - Peak Hour Volume Approach Lanes One SATISFIED YES ❑ NO It YES ❑ NO 01 YES NO ❑ YES I- NO ❑ SATISFIED YES 13ir NO 0 2or �/L /`j--A- more 6 Hour Both Approaches - Major Street ✓ tact10 q1S1 it*S (030 Highest Approaches - Minor Street IZf I 4 1 132, i./ * Refer to Figure 9-8 (URBAN AREAS) or Figure 9-9 (RURAL AREAS) to determine if this warrant is satisfied. The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily justification for a signal. Delay, congestion, confusion or other evidence of the need for right-of-way assignment must be shown. Traffic Manual TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-13 400 _ a > z 300 I-U w Q wO 12 ix Na a cc a 200 Ow zg J 0 > = 100 0 0 Figure 9-7 FOUR HOUR VOLUME WARRANT (Rural Areas) i.. \ W t-v- -2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) I 1- t - 2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (M NOR) OR 1 LANE (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) 1 LANE (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (MINOR) 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH * NOTE: 7-1996 3 * * 900 1000 80 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 60 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. Traffic Manual 500 a > 400 F- a LU cc 300 o. < a z= 200 2 J 0 C7 100 0 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND LIGHTING 9-15 7-1996 Figure 9-9 PEAK HOUR VOLUME WARRANT (Rural Areas) 2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) 2 OR MORE LANES (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (MINOR) OR 1 LANE (MAJOR) & 2 OR MORE LANES (MINOR) LANE (MAJOR) & 1 LANE (MINO 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 MAJOR STREET - TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPH * NOTE: 1200 1300 100 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACH WITH TWO OR MORE LANES AND 75 VPH APPLIES AS THE LOWER THRESHOLD VOLUME FOR A MINOR STREET APPROACHING WITH ONE LANE. AGENDA ITEM 5./.7 June 3, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Peter A. Cosentini, City Manager SUBJECT: Solid Waste Rate Increase to Pass Through Increase in Landfill Gate Fees RECOMMENDATION: Approve the rate increase requested by CR&R Disposal. BACKGROUND: CR&R Disposal holds an exclusive franchise from the city to provide solid waste services within San Jacinto. Paragraph 12.01(a) of the franchise agreement entitles CR&R to increase its solid waste charges to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"). Paragraph 12.01(b) of the franchise agreement provides that "Subject to approval by the City Council, the Contractor [CR&R Disposal] may increase the rates as necessary to cover gate fee charges, upon notification and justification to the Contract Administrator at least sixty (60) days in advance of the effective date of such an increase." The County of Riverside has increased landfill gate fees by 1.8% to reflect the annual change in the Consumer Price Index. CR&R Disposal is requesting a 1.8% rate increase to both its basic service charges and landfill gate fee charges, as allowed under the franchise agreement. JUSTIFICATION: This rate increase has been requested because the County of Riverside has increased its landfill tipping fees, and CR&R Disposal is allowed under the terms of its franchise with the City to pass through landfill gate fee increase to customers. The 1.8% increase in service charges to reflect the change in the CPI is also permitted under the franchise. Page 1 of 2 BUDGETARY IMPACT: The requested rate increase will have a minor positive fiscal impact for the city. CR&R increased basic service charges cause the City to receive additional revenue in the form of franchise fees. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter from CR&R Disposal dated April 26, 2004 requesting rate increase 2. Paragraphs 12.01(a) and (b) of the City's solid waste franchise agreement Page 2 of 2 CR&R SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION April 26. 2004 1706 GOETZ ROAD PERRIS, CA 92570 P.0 BOX 1208 PERRIS, CA 92572 FAX 909.557.5493 909943.1991 B Y:------------ - --- Mr. Peter Cosentini City Manager City of San Jacinto 201 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92582 Re: Annual Consumer Price Index Increase Dear Peter: As provided for in the contract between the City of San Jacinto and CR&R Incorporated, the rates illustrated in Exhibit "A" shall be adjusted annually to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). In reviewing the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for April 2003 through March 2004, the CPI has increased by 1.8%. In addition, the County of Riverside Waste Management Department will be increasing the landfill tipping fee by 1.8% or $.54 per ton. Based on the aforementioned, I have prepared the methodology as prescribed in the contract to pass these increased costs through. I have also prepared a new Exhibit "A" to reflect the incremental increases that will become effective August 1, 2004. Please review the attached and advise me if a meeting is desired or the rates as prepared are consistent with the contract. Sincerel David Fahrion President attachments CITY OF SAN JACINTO Adjustments Consumer Price Index (CPI) - 1.8% Landfill Fee Increase -1.8% or $.54/ton Residential • Single Family Residence Service: $15.37 per month - $3.73 landfill fee x 1.8% CPI = $.21 Landfill: $3.73 per month x 1.8% = $.07 Total Increase: $.28 per month • Mobile Home Unit Service: $14.65 per month - $3.73 landfill fee x 1.8% CPI = $.20 Landfill: $3.73 per month x 1.8% = $.07 Total Increase: $.27 per month Commercial • Commercial Curbside Service Service: $44.28 per month - $3.73 landfill fee x 1.8% = $ .73 Landfill: $3.73 per month x 1.8% $ .07 Total Increase: $ .80 per month • 2 Cubic Yard Container Service: $91.24 per month - $19.31 landfill fee x 1.8% _ $1.29 Landfill: $19.31 per month x 1.8% $ .35 Total Increase: $1.64 per month • 3 Cubic Yard Container Service: $134.75 per month - $28.97 landfill fee x 1.8% = $1.90 Landfill: $28.97 per month x 1.8% $ .52 Total Increase: $2.42 per month • 4 Cubic Yard Container Service: $168.86 per month - $38.62 landfill fee x 1.8% = $2.34 Landfill: $38.62 per month x 1.8% .70 Total Increase: $3.04 per month • Temporary 3 Cubic Yard Container Service: $50.44 per load - $6.69 landfill fee x 1.8% = $ .79 Landfill: $6.69 per load x 1.8%= .12 Total Increase: $ .91 per load • Extra 3 Cubic Yard Dump Service: $39.50 per dump - $6.69 landfill fee x 1.8% = $ .59 Landfill: $6.69 per load x 1.8%= $ .12 Total Increase: $ .71 per dump Roll -off Service • 30 Yard Roll -off Box Service: $188.93 per load x 1.8% = $3.40 per load • 40 Yard Roll -off Box Service: $220.41 per load x 1.8% = $3.97 per load City of San Jacinto Effective August 1, 2004 Residential Service Refuse - 20-33 gallon bags or barrels (five) max per p/u Recycling - 60 gallon Grey (CR&R provided) Greenwaste - 20-33 gallon cans with a "greenwaste" label (five) max per p/u Mobile Home Service Refuse - 20-33 gallon bags or barrels (five) maximum Recycling - 60 gallon Grey (CR&R provided) Greenwaste - 20-33 gallon cans with a "geenwaste" label Commercial Barrel Service Refuse - 20-33 gallon bags or barrels (five) maximum Recycling - 100 gallon Grey (CR&R provided) $15.65 per month $15.01 per month $45.07 per month Commercial Refuse & Recycling Bins Compacted Rates © 2.5 x Monthly Rate 2 Cubic Yard 1x $92.88 2x $162.02 3x $234.14 4x $304.03 5x $374.91 6x $446.95 3 Cubic Yard 1x $137.17 2x $234.07 3x $338.48 4x $441.38 5x $548.61 6x $652.36 4 Cubic Yard 1x $171.90 2x $306.18 3x $442.53 4x $581.50 5x $719.20 6x $883.12 Temporary Services 3 Cubic Yard - Clean Up Bin $51.35 includes 7 day lease - 500 Ib max. weight Additional Pick Up $40.21 includes 7 day lease - 500 Ib max. weight Permanent "On Cali" Roll -offs 10 Cubic Yard - Lowboy $192.33 Plus $30.54 per ton 40 Cubic Yard - Roll Off $224.38 Plus $30.54 per ton Compactors $224.38 Plus $30.54 per ton col r, From: BLS Fax -on -Demand - San Francis To; 9099431364 This card is available on the Internet on the day of publication al hlto:llwww.bis,uov!re9/oachisl.htm. This card is also available on our Fax-On-Dernand service. To obtairl a copy call 415-975-4567. When asked for a document number, enter 9100. Eleven prior months are also on the the Fax -On -Demand system, to receive a copy o February 2004, enter 91U2, January 2004, enter 9101, December 2003, enter 9112, November 2003, enter 9111, October 2003, enter 9110, etc. CONSUMER PRICE INDEXES PACIFIC CITIES AND U. S. CITY AVERAGE March 2004 ALL ITEMS INDEXES AII Urban Consumers (CPI-U) Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-VY) Percent Change Percent Change Year ending MONTHLY DATA Indexes Year ending 1 Month ending Indexes 1 Month ending Mar Feb. Mar. Feb. Mar. Mar- Mar. Feb. Mar. Feb. Mar. Mar 2003 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2003 2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 U. S. City Average 184.2 186.2 187.4 1.7 1.7 0.6 180.3 181.9 182.9 1.5 1.4 0.5 (1967=100) 551.8 557.9 561.5 - - - 537.1 541.7 544.8 - 0.8 Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange Co 188.2 190.1 191.5 1.9 1.8 0.7 181 6 183.4 184.9 2.1 1.8 (1967=100) 556.1 561.7 565.9 - - - 536.7 541.9 546.5 0.8 West 189.3 190.8 192.2 1.4 1.5 0.7 184.7 185.7 187.1 1.4 1.3 (Dec. 1977 = 100) 306.0 308.5 310.6 - - - 297.2 299.8 301.0 - - 0.8 West -A' 192.1 193.2 194,5 1.2 1.2 0.7 185.9 186.5 187.9 1.1 1.1 - (Dec. 1977 = 100) 313.2 315.0 317.1 - - - 300.9 301.8 304.1 - - 1.8 0.7 West- B!C"(Dec. 1996=100) 115.4 117.0 . 117.9 2.2_ 2.2 0.8 115.1 116.4 117.2 2.1 All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) Percent Change Percent Change Year ending BI-MONTHLY DATA Indexes Year ending 2 Months ending Indexes 2 Months endin Feb_ Dec. Feb. Dec. Feb. Feb. Feb. Dec. Feb. Dec. Feb. Feb. 2003 2003 2004 2003 2004 2004 2003 2003 2004 2003 2004 2004 San Francisco -Oakland -San Jose 197.7 195.3 198.1 1.1 0.2 1.4 193.7 191.1 194.1 0.8 0.2 1.6 - (1967=10U) 607.7 600.5 609.0 - - 589.9 581.9 591.2 - - 1.3 Seattle -Tacoma -Bremerton 191.3 191.0 193.5 0.5 1.2 1.3 186.2 185.3 187.8 0.4 0.9 (1967=100) 583.1 582.2 590.0 - - 552.2 549-5 556.9 - - - N t Av ilable • latron A = 1.500.000 populabon and over " &C = less than 1 500.000 popu Release date April 14, 2004. The next monthly and bi-monthly releases are schedule for May 14, 2004. The next semi-anuual release will be issued on August 17, 2004_ Anchorage(907) 271-2770 Los Angeles (310) 235-6884 Phoenix (480) 503-9075 Honolulu (808) 541-2808 Portland (503) 326-2081 San Diego (619) 557-6538 San Francisco (415) 975-4350 Seattle (206) 553-0645 This card is available on the day of release by electronic distribution. Just go to www.bls.uovlblsllist.11tm and sign up for the free on-line delivery service. For questions, please contact us at BLSInfoSF[bZBLS COV or (415) 975-4350. AGENDA ITEM 51,S' June 3, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Peter A. Cosentini, City Manager SUBJECT: Sale of City's Police Vehicles to Riverside County Sheriffs Department RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the sale of 19-City Police vehicles identified in this report to the County of Riverside Sheriffs Department for $275,000, pursuant to the attached letter by Michael S. Lee, Procurement Contract Specialist for County of Riverside Purchasing and Fleet Services. BACKGROUND: As the Council is aware, the Riverside County Sheriffs Department will be providing the city with police services starting June 1, 2004. It has been discussed that the Sheriffs Department is interested in buying some of the City's police cars. The County has made an offer on 19 of our vehicles as identified in the attached report. The original offer was $226,440. I countered with a blue- book estimate of $293,935, and negotiated back and forth on items we thought were germane to the value of the car. We settled our negotiations on the agreed upon payment of $275,000 as noted in Mr. Lee's letter faxed to the City on May 19, 2004. I believe this is a fair price for the vehicles and recommend Council's approval of the sale. JUSTIFICATION: We need to sell surplus City property. BUDGETARY IMPACT: An additional $275,000 to the City's general fund. Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Riverside County Letter of Offer for Purchase of City Patrol Units dated May 19, 2004 Page 2 of 2 G OUN Mr. Peter Consentini City Manager City Of San Jacinto 201 E. Main Street San Jacinto, Ca 92583 PURCHASING AND FLEET SERVICES BY: -------------------- Re: Purchase of San Jacinto Law Enforcement Vehicles Dear Mr. Consentini: ROBERT J. HOWDYSHELL DIRECTOR PURCHASING SUPPLY CENTRAL MAIL PRINTING FLEET On the behalf of the County of Riverside and as a duly authorized agent of the County through the delegation of authority from the County Purchasing Agent, Mr. Robert Howdyshell, I would like to extend to you and the City of San Jacinto an offer in the amount of $275,000.00 in exchange for the purchase of selected law enforcement vehicles under the City Police Department fleet. A complete listing of the selected vehicles is referenced in the City's transmittal of information dated 5/13/04. If the City of San Jacinto accepts our offer, we would request of you immediate receipt of an appropriate invoice in this amount to the following address: County of Riverside Purchasing and Fleet Services Attn: Mel Coward, Fleet Services 2980 Washington Street Riverside, Ca 92504 Upon receipt of your invoice. the County will process payment to the City in a timely manner. County will also issue a purchase order to the City as a formality to our Purchasing and Financial system to accurately record the transaction. We request that all title and registration for the vehicles be forwarded to same address above for title and registration transfer by the County. It is anticipated that payment to the City will be made by a County third party leasing firm, Banc of America, directly to the City. If there is any change to this arrangement, we will notify you of those changes. 2980 WASHINGTON STREET • RIVERSIDE, CA 92504-4647 • (909) 955-4937 • FAX (909) 955.4946 The County acknowledges your generous consideration extended to the County in your letter to Sheriff John Doyle, dated May 19, 2004 for the beneficial use of the vehicles in the interim period. We are grateful to you for your assistance. The County looks forward to our continued strong relationship. If I may be of further assistance to you or may answer any questions, please feel free to contact me at (909)955-4942. Sincerely, Michael S. Lee Procurement Contract Specialist County of Riverside Purchasing and Fleet Services SAN JACINTO POLICE DEPARTMENT'S VEHICLE DATA PATROL VEHICLES /,///// ,////9//////=�'/ 107 2003 Ford Crown Vic B&W Excellent 13422 11,160 3,365 14,525 108 2003 Ford Crown Vic B&W Good 13893 11,160 3,365 14,525 109 2003 Ford Crown Vic B&W Good 19112 11,160 3,365 14,525 110 2003 Ford Crown Vic B&W Good 9742 11,160 3,365 14,525 124 2000 Ford Crown Vic B&W Good 48195 6,390 1,934 8,324 125 2000 Ford Crown Vic B&W Good 42918 6,390 1,934 8,324 126 2000 Ford Crown Vic B&W Good 48740 6,390 1,934 8,324 127 2000 Ford Crown Vic B&W Good 44241 6,390 1,934 8,324 128 2000 Ford Crown Vic B&W Good 43214 6,390 1,934 8,324 134 2000 Ford Crown Vic B&W Good 40825 6,390 1,934 8,324 135 2000 Ford Crown Vic B&W Good 33523 6,390 1,934 8,324 136 2000 Ford Crown Vic B&W Good 34639 6,390 1,934 8,324 181 2004 Ford Crown Vic B&W Excellent 2857 15,805 4,877 20,682 182 2004 Ford Crown Vic B&W Excellent 4851 15,805 4,877 20,682 183 2004 Ford Crown Vic B&W Excellent 1097+ 15,805 4,877 20,682 184 2004 Ford Crown Vic B&W Excellent 1097+ 15,805 4,877 20,682 PLAIN VEHICLES z /0/ ,/// /1/1/1/1/1/1/1/ 139 2002 Chevy Impala Silver Good 29615 6,115 250 6,365 142 2002 Chevy Impala Gold Good 40790 6,115 175 6,290 143 2002 Chevy Impala Bronze Good 40923 6,115 250 6,365 226,440 5/13/2004 1 SAN JACINTO POLICE DEPARTMENT VEHICLE DATA - ADJUSTED BLUE BOOK FIGURES UNIT YEAR / MAKE /MODEL CONDITION MILEAGE PRICE OUTFITTING TOTAL 107 2003, Ford, Crown Vic. Excellent 13,500 16,425 3,365 19,790 108 2003, Ford, Crown Vic. Good 14,000 15,330 3,365 18,695 109 2003, Ford, Crown Vic. Good 20,000 14,780 3,365 18,145 110 2003, Ford, Crown Vic. Good 10,000 15,580 3,365 19,245 124 2000, Ford, Crown Vic. Good 50,000 8,860 1,934 10,794 125 2000, Ford, Crown Vic. Good 43,000 9,085 1,934 11,019 126 2000, Ford, Crown Vic. Good 50,000 8,860 1,934 10,794 127 2000, Ford, Crown Vic. Good 45,000 8,985 1,934 10,919 128 2000, Ford, Crown Vic. Good 44,000 9,085 1,934 11,019 134 2000, Ford, Crown Vic. Good 41,000 9,085 1,934 11,019 135 2000, Ford, Crown Vic. Good 35,000 9,235 1,934 11,169 136 2000, Ford, Crown Vic. Good 35,000 9,235 1,934 11,169 139 2002, Chev, Impala Good 30,000 11,035 250 11,285 142 2002, Chev, Impala Good 42,000 9,960 250 10,210 143 2002, Chev, Impala Good 42,000 9,960 250 10,210 181 2004, Ford, Crown Vic. Excellent 3,000 19,780 4,877 24,657 182 2004, Ford, Crown Vic. Excellent 5,000 19,605 4,877 24,482 183 2004, Ford, Crown Vic. Excellent 1,100 19,780 4,877 24,657 184 2004, Ford, Crown Vic. Excellent 1,100 19,780 4,877 24.657 293,935 Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values Page 1 of 2 N� /07 Kelley Blue Book THE TRUSTED RESOURCE kbb cam HOME NEW CARS USED CARS REVIEWS & RATINGS ADVICE FINANCING & INSURANCE BLUE BOOK PRIVATE PARTY REPORT California • May 17, 2004 2003 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan 4D rikex. Engine: V8 4.6 Liter Trans: Automatic Drive: Rear Wheel Drive Mileage: 13,500 Equipment Air Conditioning Power Steering Power Windows Power Door Locks 0 Free Dealer Price Quote 0 Search Used Car Listings 0 list Your 1 A er: scr--= See Local Listings of This Car List Your Car For Sale Online Buy a New Car Free Lemon Check Auto Loans from 3.85% APR Insurance Quote Print "For Sale" Sign Payment Calculator Tilt Wheel Cruise Control AM/FM Stereo Cassette Dual Front Air Bags ABS (4-Wheel) Power Seat Consumer Rated Condition: Excellent "Excellent" condition means that the vehicle looks great, is in excellent mechanical condition and needs no reconditioning. It should pass a smog inspection. The engine compartment should be clean, with no fluid leaks. The paint is glossy and the body and interior are free of any wear or visible defects. There is no rust. The tires are the proper size and match and are new or nearly new. A clean title history is assumed. This is an exceptional vehicle. Private Party Value $16,425 Private Party value represents what you might expect to pay for a used car when purchasing from a private party. It may also represent the value you might expect to receive when selling your own used car to another private party. Get a Used Car Trade -In Value Get Invoice & MSRP on New Cars Get a Person to Person Auto Loan ES( NEW CAR& GET ,� tt pp FOR 1 r r s @ �dE�lfte, MSRP ORd Newr.(ol I E http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.dll/kw.kc.ur?kbb.CA;424171;CA065&92583;sed+p&722;Ford;2003%... 5/17/2004 Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values Page 1 of 2 UN! r / ° S ino Kelley Blue Book THE TRUSTED RESOURCE kb6.cam HOME NEW CARS USED CARS REVIEWS & RATINGS ADVICE FINANCING & INSURANCE BLUE BOOK PRIVATE PARTY REPORT California • May 17, 2004 2003 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan 4D Engine: V8 4.6 Liter Trans: Automatic Drive: Rear Wheel Drive Mileage: 14,000 Equipment Air Conditioning Power Steering Power Windows Power Door Locks 0 Free Dealer Price Quote @ Search Used Car Listings 0I.LSI Your I See Local Listings of This Car List Your Car For Sale Online Buy a New Car Free Lemon Check Auto Loans from 3.85% APR Insurance Quote Print "For Sale" Sign Payment Calculator Tilt Wheel Cruise Control AM/FM Stereo Cassette Dual Front Air Bags ABS (4-Wheel) Power Seat Consumer Rated Condition: Good "Good" condition means that the vehicle is free of any major defects. The paint, body and interior have only minor (if any) blemishes, and there are no major mechanical problems. In states where rust is a problem, this should be very minimal, and a deduction should be made to correct it. The tires match and have substantial tread wear left. A clean title history is assumed. A "good" vehicle will need some reconditioning to be sold at retail; however major reconditioning should be deducted from the value. Most recent model cars owned by consumers fall into this category. Private Party Value $15,330 Private Party value represents what you might expect to pay for a used car when purchasing from a private party. It may also represent the value you might expect to receive when selling your own used car to another private party. Get a Used Car Trade -In Value Get Invoice & MSRP on New Cars AdVCr: sec Found that new ca http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.dil/kw.kc.ur?kbb.CA;424171;CA065&92583;sed+p&722;Ford;2003%... 5/17/2004 Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values Page 1 of 2 Kelley Blue Book THE TRUSTED RESOURCE kik com NEW CARS } USED CARS (,Jg,r/ d q REVIEWS & RATINGS ADVICE FINANCING & INSURANCE BLUE BOOK PRIVATE PARTY REPORT California • May 17, 2004 2003 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan 4D Engine: VB 4.6 Liter Trans: Automatic Drive: Rear Wheel Drive Mileage: 20,000 Equipment Air Conditioning Power Steering Power Windows Power Door Locks Free Dealer Price Ouote Seerdi Used Car Listings 0 Lis! Your t See Local Listings of This Car List Your Car For Sale Online Buy a New Car Free Lemon Check Auto Loans from 3.85% APR Insurance Quote Print "For Sale" Sign Payment Calculator Tilt Wheel Cruise Control AM/FM Stereo Cassette Dual Front Air Bags ABS (4-Wheel) Power Seat Consumer Rated Condition: Good "Good" condition means that the vehicle is free of any major defects. The paint, body and interior have only minor (if any) blemishes, and there are no major mechanical problems. In states where rust is a problem, this should be very minimal, and a deduction should be made to correct it. The tires match and have substantial tread wear left. A clean title history is assumed. A "good" vehicle will need some reconditioning to be sold at retail; however major reconditioning should be deducted from the value. Most recent model cars owned by consumers fall into this category. Private Party Value $14,780 Private Party value represents what you might expect to pay for a used car when purchasing from a private party. It may also represent the value you might expect to receive when selling your own used car to another private party. Get a Used Car Trade -In Value Get Invoice & MSRP on New Cars Adver: serrc http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.dll/kw.kc.ur?kbb.CA;424171;CA065&92583;sed+p&722;Ford;2003%... 5/17/2004 Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values Page 1 of 2 Kelley Blue Book THE TRUSTED RESOURCE khh cam NEW CARS USED CARS ay/ i I/O REVIEWS & RATINGS ADVICE FINANCING & INSURANCE BLUE BOOK PRIVATE PARTY REPORT California • May 17, 2004 2003 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan 4D Engine: V8 4.6 Liter Trans: Automatic Drive: Rear Wheel Drive Mileage: 10,000 Equipment Air Conditioning Power Steering Power Windows Power Door Locks Free Dealer Pnce Quote 0 Search Used Car Lislings 0 Lisl Your 1 See Local Listings of This Car List Your Car For Sale Online Buy a New Car Free Lemon Check Auto Loans from 3.85% APR Insurance Quote Print "For Sale" Sign Payment Calculator Tilt Wheel Cruise Control AM/FM Stereo Cassette Dual Front Air Bags ABS (4-Wheel) Power Seat Consumer Rated Condition: Good "Good" condition means that the vehicle is free of any major defects. The paint, body and interior have only minor (if any) blemishes, and there are no major mechanical problems. In states where rust is a problem, this should be very minimal, and a deduction should be made to correct it. The tires match and have substantial tread wear left. A clean title history is assumed. A "good" vehicle will need some reconditioning to be sold at retail; however major reconditioning should be deducted from the value. Most recent model cars owned by consumers fall Into this category. Private Party Value $15,580 Private Party value represents what you might expect to pay for a used car when purchasing from a private party. It may also represent the value you might expect to receive when selling your own used car to another private party. Get a Used Car Trade -In Value Get Invoice & MSRP on New Cars AdVer71SerrE httD://www.kbb. com/kb/ki.dli/kw.kc.ur?kbb.CA:424171:CA065&92583:sed+D&722:Ford:2003%... 5/17/2004 Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values Page 1 of 2 Kelley Blue Book THE TRUSTED RESOURCE kbb cam HOME C' USED CARS ON/7 /2 REVIEWS & RATINGS ADVICE FINANCING & INSURANCE BLUE BOOK PRIVATE PARTY REPORT California • May 17, 2004 2000 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan 4D Engine: V8 4.6 Liter Trans: Automatic Drive: Rear Wheel Drive Mileage: 50,000 Equipment Air Conditioning Power Steering Power Windows Power Door Locks Free Dealer Price quote 0 Search Used Car Listings 0 list Your 1 See Local Listings of This Car List Your Car For Sale Online Buy a New Car Free Lemon Check Auto Loans from 3.85% APR Insurance Quote Print "For Sale" Sign Payment Calculator Tilt Wheel Cruise Control AM/FM Stereo Cassette Dual Front Air Bags ABS (4-Wheel) Consumer Rated Condition: Good "Good" condition means that the vehicle is free of any major defects. The paint, body and interior have only minor (if any) blemishes, and there are no major mechanical problems. In states where rust is a problem, this should be very minimal, and a deduction should be made to correct it. The tires match and have substantial tread wear left. A clean title history is assumed. A "good" vehicle will need some reconditioning to be sold at retail; however major reconditioning should be deducted from the value. Most recent model cars owned by consumers fall into this category. Private Party Value $8,860 Private Party value represents what you might expect to pay for a used car when purchasing from a private party. It may also represent the value you might expect to receive when selling your own used car to another private party. Get a Used Car Trade -In Value Get Invoice & MSRP on New Cars Adverasernc Found that new ca http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki_dll/kw.kc.ur?kbb.CA;424171;CA065&92583;sed+p&722;Ford;2000%... 5/17/2004 Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values Page 1 of 2 Kelley Blue Book THE TRUSTED RESOURCE kbb.cam HOME CMED USED CARS REVIEWS & RATINGS ADVICE FINANCING & INSURANCE BLUE BOOK PRIVATE PARTY REPORT California • May 17, 2004 2000 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan 4D Engine: V8 4.6 Liter Trans: Automatic Drive: Rear Wheel Drive Mileage: 43,000 Equipment Air Conditioning Power Steering Power Windows Power Door Locks Free Dea4er Prico Guole 0 Search Used Car Listings 0 List Your See Local Listings of This Car List Your Car For Sale Online Buy a New Car Free Lemon Check Auto Loans from 3.85% APR Insurance Quote Print "For Sale" Sign Payment Calculator Tilt Wheel Cruise Control AM/FM Stereo Cassette Dual Front Air Bags ABS (4-Wheel) Consumer Rated Condition: Good "Good" condition means that the vehicle is free of any major defects. The paint, body and interior have only minor (if any) blemishes, and there are no major mechanical problems. In states where rust is a problem, this should be very minimal, and a deduction should be made to correct it. The tires match and have substantial tread wear left. A clean title history is assumed. A "good" vehicle will need some reconditioning to be sold at retail; however major reconditioning should be deducted from the value. Most recent model cars owned by consumers fall into this category. Private Party Value $9,085 Private Party value represents what you might expect to pay for a used car when purchasing from a private party. It may also represent the value you might expect to receive when selling your own used car to another private party. Get a Used Car Trade -In Value Get Invoice & MSRP on New Cars Adver-!sem_ http://www.kbb.com/kb/ld.d11/kw.kc.ur?kbb.CA;424171;CA065&92583;sed+p&722;Ford;2000%... 5/17/2004 Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values Page 1 of 2 Kelley Blue Book THE TRUSTED RESOURCE kbb.com HOME NEW CARS USED CARS (ill+!✓ /2 •b REVIEWS & RATINGS ADVICE FINANCING IL INSURANCE BLUE BOOK PRIVATE PARTY REPORT California • May 17, 2004 2000 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan 4D Engine: V8 4.6 Liter Trans: Automatic Drive: Rear Wheel Drive Mileage: 50,000 Equipment Air Conditioning Power Steering Power Windows Power Door Locks 0 Free Dealer Price Quote 0 Search Used Car Listings 0 List Your r See Local Listings of This Car List Your Car For Sale Online Buy a New Car Free Lemon Check Auto Loans from 3.85% APR Insurance Quote Print "For Sale" Sign Payment Calculator Tilt Wheel Cruise Control AM/FM Stereo Cassette Dual Front Air Bags ABS (4-Wheel) Consumer Rated Condition: Good "Good" condition means that the vehicle is free of any major defects. The paint, body and interior have only minor (if any) blemishes, and there are no major mechanical problems. In states where rust is a problem, this should be very minimal, and a deduction should be made to correct it. The tires match and have substantial tread wear left. A clean title history is assumed. A "good" vehicle will need some reconditioning to be sold at retail; however major reconditioning should be deducted from the value. Most recent model cars owned by consumers fall into this category. Private Party Value $8,860 Private Party value represents what you might expect to pay for a used car when purchasing from a private party. It may also represent the value you might expect to receive when selling your own used car to another private party. Get a Used Car Trade -In Value Get Invoice & MSRP on New Cars .7111. atcr: 1HE, flue C RUSTtt) RES( • NEW CAR® What SHOU new car co http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.d11/kw.kc.ur?kbb.CA;424171;CA065&92583;sed+p&722;Ford;2000%... 5/17/2004 Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values Page 1 of 2 HOME Kelley Blue Book THE TRUSTED RESOURCE kbb.com (IrwiT /27 VEHICLE HISTORY REPORTS click hareI FREE CARFAX Record Ch on any used car! NEW CARS USED CARS REVIEWS & RATINGS ADVICE FINANCING & INSURANCE BLUE BOOK PRIVATE PARTY REPORT California • May 17, 2004 2000 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan 4D Engine: V8 4.6 Liter Trans: Automatic Drive: Rear Wheel Drive Mileage: 45,000 Equipment Air Conditioning Power Steering Power Windows Power Door Locks 0 Free Dealer Price Quote 0 Search Used Car Listings 0 Lis! Your I See Local Listings of This Car List Your Car For Sale Online Buy a New Car Free Lemon Check Auto Loans from 3.85% APR Insurance Quote Print "For Sale" Sign Payment Calculator Tilt Wheel Cruise Control AM/FM Stereo Cassette Dual Front Air Bags ABS (4-Wheel) Consumer Rated Condition: Good "Good" condition means that the vehicle is free of any major defects. The paint, body and interior have only minor (if any) blemishes, and there are no major mechanical problems. In states where rust is a problem, this should be very minimal, and a deduction should be made to correct it. The tires match and have substantial tread wear left. A clean title history Is assumed. A "good" vehicle will need some reconditioning to be sold at retail; however major reconditioning should be deducted from the value. Most recent model cars owned by consumers fall into this category. Private Party Value $8,985 Private Party value represents what you might expect to pay for a used car when purchasing from a private party. It may also represent the value you might expect to receive when selling your own used car to another private party. Get a Used Car Trade -In Value Get Invoice & MSRP on New Cars 5dver: serre http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.d11/kw.kc.ur?kbb.CA;424171;CA065&92583;sed+p&722;Ford;2000%... 5/17/2004 Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values Page 1 of 2 Kelley Blue Book THE TRUSTED RESOURCE kbb.cem HOME NEW CARS USED CARS (,4i,T /28 REVIEWS IL RATINGS ADVICE FINANCING & INSURANCE BLUE BOOK PRIVATE PARTY REPORT California • May 17, 2004 2000 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan 4D Engine: V8 4.6 Liter Trans: Automatic Drive: Rear Wheel Drive Mileage: 44,000 Equipment Air Conditioning Power Steering Power Windows Power Door Locks Free Gealer Price Quote 0 Search Used Car Listings Cr List Your See Local Listings of This Car List Your Car For Sale Online Buy a New Car Free Lemon Check Auto Loans from 3.85% APR Insurance Quote Print "For Sale" Sign Payment Calculator Tilt Wheel Cruise Control AM/FM Stereo Cassette Dual Front Air Bags ABS (4-Wheel) Consumer Rated Condition: Good "Good" condition means that the vehicle is free of any major defects. The paint, body and interior have only minor (if any) blemishes, and there are no major mechanical problems. In states where rust is a problem, this should be very minimal, and a deduction should be made to correct it. The tires match and have substantial tread wear left. A clean title history is assumed. A "good" vehicle will need some reconditioning to be sold at retail; however major reconditioning should be deducted from the value. Most recent model cars owned by consumers fall into this category. Private Party Value $9,085 Private Party value represents what you might expect to pay for a used car when purchasing from a private party. It may also represent the value you might expect to receive when selling your own used car to another private party. Get a Used Car Trade -In Value Get Invoice & MSRP on New Cars Advertser-e- Hole • Rust ED Rts>y NEW CARE http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.dll/kw.kc.ur?kbb.CA;424171;CA065&92583;sed+p&722;Ford;2000%... 5/17/2004 Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values Page 1 of 2 Kelley Blue Book THE TRUSTED RESOURCE khb.cam HOME NEW CARS USED CARS ON/2 fay REVIEWS & RATINGS ADVICE FINANCING & INSURANCE BLUE BOOK PRIVATE PARTY REPORT California • May 17, 2004 2000 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan 4D Engine: V8 4.6 Liter Trans: Automatic Drive: Rear Wheel Drive Mileage: 41,000 Equipment Air Conditioning Power Steering Power Windows Power Door Locks ._� Free Dealer Pnce Quota ') Search Used Car Listings 0 Lis! Your See Local Listings of This Car List Your Car For Sale Online Buy a New Car Free Lemon Check Auto Loans from 3.85% APR Insurance Quote Print "For Sale" Sign Payment Calculator Tilt Wheel Cruise Control AM/FM Stereo Cassette Dual Front Air Bags ABS (4-Wheel) Consumer Rated Condition: Good "Good" condition means that the vehicle is free of any major defects. The paint, body and interior have only minor (if any) blemishes, and there are no major mechanical problems. In states where rust is a problem, this should be very minimal, and a deduction should be made to correct it. The tires match and have substantial tread wear left. A clean title history Is assumed. A "good" vehicle will need some reconditioning to be sold at retail; however major reconditioning should be deducted from the value. Most recent model cars owned by consumers fall into this category. Private Party Value $9,085 Private Party value represents what you might expect to pay for a used car when purchasing from a private party. It may also represent the value you might expect to receive when selling your own used car to another private party. Get a Used Car Trade -In Value Get Invoice & MSRP on New Cars Acver: serr€ Found that new ca http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.dli/kw.kc.ur?kbb.CA;424171;CA065&92583;sed+p&722;Ford;2000%... 5/17/2004 Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values Page 1 of 2 1 3C Kelley Blue Book THE TRUSTED RESOURCE kbb cam HOME NEW CARS USED CARS REVIEWS & RATINGS ADVICE FINANCING & INSURANCE BLUE BOOK PRIVATE PARTY REPORT California • May 17, 2004 2000 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan 4D Engine: V8 4.6 Liter Trans: Automatic Drive: Rear Wheel Drive Mileage: 35,000 Equipment Air Conditioning Power Steering Power Windows Power Door Locks C Free Dealer Price Quote 0 Search Used Car Listings 0 List Your ( Adveraseme See Local Listings of This Car List Your Car For Sale Online Buy a New Car Free Lemon Check Auto Loans from 3.85% APR Insurance Quote Print "For Sale" Sign Payment Calculator Tilt Wheel Cruise Control AM/FM Stereo Cassette Dual Front Air Bags ABS (4-Wheel) Consumer Rated Condition: Good "Good" condition means that the vehicle is free of any major defects. The paint, body and interior have only minor (if any) blemishes, and there are no major mechanical problems. In states where rust is a problem, this should be very minimal, and a deduction should be made to correct it. The tires match and have substantial tread wear left. A clean title history is assumed. A "good" vehicle will need some reconditioning to be sold at retail; however major reconditioning should be deducted from the value. Most recent model cars owned by consumers fall into this category. Private Party Value $9,235 Private Party value represents what you might expect to pay for a used car when purchasing from a private party. It may also represent the value you might expect to receive when selling your own used car to another private party. Get a Used Car Trade -In Value Get Invoice & MSRP on New Cars MRyp GRIM RnVc;teP and flew fsr !1� http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.d11/kw.kc.ur?kbb.CA;424171;CA065 &92583;sed+p&722;Ford;2000%... 5/17/2004 Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values Page 1 of 2 Kelley Blue Book THE TRUSTED RESOURCE Maim HOME NEW CARS USED CARS ijfl,7 /3G REVIEWS L RATINGS BLUE BOOK PRIVATE PARTY REPORT California • May 17, 2004 2000 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan 4D Engine: V8 4.6 Liter Trans: Automatic Drive: Rear Wheel Drive Mileage: 35,000 Equipment Air Conditioning Power Steering Power Windows Power Door Locks See Local Listings of This Car List Your Car For Sale Online Buy a New Car Free Lemon Check Auto Loans from 3.85% APR Insurance Quote Print "For Sale" Sign Payment Calculator Tilt Wheel Cruise Control AM/FM Stereo Cassette Dual Front Air Bags ABS (4-Wheel) Consumer Rated Condition: Good "Good" condition means that the vehicle is free of any major defects. The paint, body and interior have only minor (if any) blemishes, and there are no major mechanical problems. In states where rust is a problem, this should be very minimal, and a deduction should be made to correct it. The tires match and have substantial tread wear left. A clean title history is assumed. A "good" vehicle will need some reconditioning to be sold at retail; however major reconditioning should be deducted from the value. Most recent model cars owned by consumers fall into this category. Private Party Value $9,235 Private Party value represents what you might expect to pay for a used car when purchasing from a private party. It may also represent the value you might expect to receive when selling your own used car to another private party. Get a Used Car Trade -In Value Get Invoice & MSRP on New Cars ADVICE FINANCING & INSURANCE G Frog Gooier Pnce Quote 0 Search Used Car Listings 0 Lisl Your 1 Adve rti se rrc ;H E`eY Blue E QUs+eD Rtsr NEW cAR$ http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.d11/kw.kc.ur?kbb.CA;424171;CA065&92583;sed+p&722;Ford;2000%... 5/17/2004 Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values Page 1 of 2 Kelley Blue Book THE TRUSTED RESOURCE Mb.cam USED CARS 04// i /39 REVIEWS & RATINGS ADVICE FINANCING & INSURANCE BLUE BOOK PRIVATE PARTY REPORT California • May 17, 2004 2002 Chevrolet Impala Sedan 4D Engine: V6 3.4 Liter Trans: Automatic Drive: Front Wheel Drive Mileage: 30,000 Equipment Air Conditioning Power Steering Power Windows Power Door Locks 0 Free Dealer Price Quote 0 Search Used CEP' Listings 0 List Your 1 See Local Listings of This Car List Your Car For Sale Online Buy a New Car Free Lemon Check Auto Loans from 3.85% APR Insurance Quote Print "For Sale" Sign Payment Calculator Tilt Wheel AM/FM Stereo Cassette Dual Front Air Bags Consumer Rated Condition: Good "Good" condition means that the vehicle is free of any major defects. The paint, body and interior have only minor (if any) blemishes, and there are no major mechanical problems. In states where rust is a problem, this should be very minimal, and a deduction should be made to correct it. The tires match and have substantial tread wear left. A clean title history is assumed. A "good" vehicle will need some reconditioning to be sold at retail; however major reconditioning should be deducted from the value. Most recent model cars owned by consumers fall into this category. Private Party Value $11,036 Private Party value represents what you might expect to pay for a used car when purchasing from a private party. It may also represent the value you might expect to receive when selling your own used car to another private party. Get a Used Car Trade -In Value . s�"MlleE to Rest NEw oaks http://www.kbb. com/kb/ki.dll/kw.kc.ur?kbb.CA;909773;CA065&92583; sed+p&723 ;Chevrolet;20... 5/17/2004 Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values Page 1 of 2 BLUE BOX Kelley Blue Book THE TRUSTED RESOURCE bb.COr HOME NEW CARS USED CARS REVIEWS & RATINGS BLUE BOOK PRIVATE PARTY REPORT California • May 17, 2004 2002 Chevrolet Impala Sedan 4D Engine: V6 3.4 Liter Trans: Automatic Drive: Front Wheel Drive Mileage: 42,000 Equipment Air Conditioning Power Steering Power Windows Power Door Locks ADVICE FINANCING & INSURANCE Ca Free Dealer Price Quoie a Search Used Car Listings 0 Lis Your I See Local Listings of This Car List Your Car For Sale Online Buy a New Car Free Lemon Check Auto Loans from 3.85% APR Insurance Quote Print "For Sale" Sign Payment Calculator Tilt Wheel AM/FM Stereo Cassette Dual Front Air Bags Consumer Rated Condition: Good "Good" condition means that the vehicle is free of any major defects. The paint, body and interior have only minor (if any) blemishes, and there are no major mechanical problems. In states where rust is a problem, this should be very minimal, and a deduction should be made to correct it. The tires match and have substantial tread wear left. A clean title history is assumed. A "good" vehicle will need some reconditioning to be sold at retail; however major reconditioning should be deducted from the value. Most recent model cars owned by consumers fall into this category. Private Party Value $9,960 Private Party value represents what you might expect to pay for a used car when purchasing from a private party. It may also represent the value you might expect to receive when selling your own used car to another private party. Get a Used Car Trade -In Value AdVnr B P U Run A FREE CARFAXO Record Check" Now! NO VEHICLE HISTORY REPORTS http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.d11/kw.kc.ur?kbb.CA;909773;CA065&92583;sed+p&723;Chevrolet;20... 5/17/2004 Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values Page 1 of 2 X EWE DIX Kelley Blue Book THE TRUSTED RESOURCE Blum HOME NEW CARS USED CARS (JN/% / /3 ( oHaute REVIEWS & RATINGS BLUE BOOK PRIVATE PARTY REPORT California • May 17, 2004 2002 Chevrolet Impala Sedan 4D Engine: V6 3.4 Liter Trans: Automatic Drive: Front Wheel Drive Mileage: 42,000 Equipment Air Conditioning Power Steering Power Windows Power Door Locks ADVICE FINANCING & INSURANCE E Free Dealer Price Quote s. Search Used Car Listings 0 Lis! Your 1 See Local Listings of This Car List Your Car For Sale Online Buy a New Car Free Lemon Check Auto Loans from 3.85% APR Insurance Quote Print "For Sale" Sign Payment Calculator Tilt Wheel AM/FM Stereo Cassette Dual Front Air Bags Consumer Rated Condition: Good "Good" condition means that the vehicle is free of any major defects. The paint, body and interior have only minor (if any) blemishes, and there are no major mechanical problems. In states where rust is a problem, this should be very minimal, and a deduction should be made to correct it. The tires match and have substantial tread wear left. A clean title history is assumed. A "good" vehicle will need some reconditioning to be sold at retail; however major reconditioning should be deducted from the value. Most recent model cars owned by consumers fall into this category. Private Party Value $9,960 Private Party value represents what you might expect to pay for a used car when purchasing from a private party. It may also represent the value you might expect to receive when selling your own used car to another private party. Get a Used Car Trade -In Value Advert se rrc 1 8 P U Run A ' R E CARFAX° Record Check" Now! 4 http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.d11/kw.kc.ur?kbb.CA;909773;CA065&92583; sed+p&723;Chevrolet;20... 5/17/2004 Page 1 of 2 Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values Kelley Blue Book THE TRUSTED RESOURCE 1bb.com USED CARS (J,v, r /6/ REVIEWS & RATINGS ADVICE FINANCING & INSURANCE BLUE BOOK PRIVATE PARTY REPORT California • May 17, 2004 2004 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan Engine: V8 4.6 Liter Trans: Automatic Drive: Rear Wheel Drive Mileage: 3,000 Equipment Air Conditioning Power Steering Power Windows Power Door Locks 4D "? Free Dealer Price Quota 0 Search Used Car Listings 0 Lot Your See Local Listings of This Car List Your Car For Sale Online Buy a New Car Free Lemon Check Auto Loans from 3.85% APR Insurance Quote Print "For Sale" Sign Payment Calculator Tilt Wheel Cruise Control AM/FM Stereo Cassette Dual Front Air Bags ABS (4-Wheel) Power Seat Consumer Rated Condition: Excellent "Excellent" condition means that the vehicle looks great, is in excellent mechanical condition and needs no reconditioning. It should pass a smog inspection. The engine compartment should be clean, with no fluid Teaks. The paint is glossy and the body and interior are free of any wear or visible defects. There is no rust. The tires are the proper size and match and are new or nearly new. A clean title history is assumed. This is an exceptional vehicle. Private Party Value $19,780 Private Party value represents what you might expect to pay for a used car when purchasing from a private party. It may also represent the value you might expect to receive when selling your own used car to another private party. Advert serrt http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.d11/kw.kc.ur?kbb.CA;424171;CA065&925 83; sed+p&722;Ford;2004%... 5/17/2004 Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values Page 1 of 2 awl suswk HOME NEW CARS Kelley Blue Book THE TRUSTED RESOURCE Alum l USED CARS (%NI% /82_ REVIEWS & RATINGS BLUE BOOK PRIVATE PARTY REPORT California • May 17, 2004 2004 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan Engine: V8 4.6 Liter Trans: Automatic Drive: Rear Wheel Drive Mileage: 5,000 Equipment Air Conditioning Power Steering Power Windows Power Door Locks 4D ADVICE FINANCING & INSURANCE Free Dealer Price Quote 0 Search Used Car Listings 0 List Your i See Local Listings of This Car List Your Car For Sale Online Buy a New Car Free Lemon Check Auto Loans from 3.85% APR Insurance Quote Print "For Sale" Sign Payment Calculator Tilt Wheel Cruise Control AM/FM Stereo Cassette Dual Front Air Bags ABS (4-Wheel) Power Seat Consumer Rated Condition: Excellent "Excellent" condition means that the vehicle looks great, is in excellent mechanical condition and needs no reconditioning. It should pass a smog inspection. The engine compartment should be clean, with no fluid leaks. The paint is glossy and the body and interior are free of any wear or visible defects. There is no rust. The tires are the proper size and match and are new or nearly new. A clean title history is assumed. This is an exceptional vehicle. Private Party Value $19,605 Private Party value represents what you might expect to pay for a used car when purchasing from a private party. It may also represent the value you might expect to receive when selling your own used car to another private party. ,Sd•.•er- serve Found that new ca http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.dll/kw.kc.ur?kbb.CA;424171;CA065&92583;sed+p&722;Ford;2004%... 5/17/2004 Kelley Blue Book Used Car Values Page 1 of 2 MINX Kelley Blue Book THE TRUSTED RESOURCE kbb com HOME NEW CARS USED CARS REVIEWS & RATINGS BLUE BOOK PRIVATE PARTY REPORT California • May 17, 2004 2004 Ford Crown Victoria Sedan Engine: V8 4.6 Liter Trans: Automatic Drive: Rear Wheel Drive Mileage: 1,100 Equipment Air Conditioning Power Steering Power Windows Power Door Locks 4D r7- /S9 a-/83 ADVICE FINANCING & INSURANCE Free Dealer Pnce Quote 0 Search Used Car I.Uslings 0 UM Your 1 See Local Listings of This Car List Your Car For Sale Online Buy a New Car Free Lemon Check Auto Loans from 3.85% APR Insurance Quote Print "For Sale" Sign Payment Calculator Tilt Wheel Cruise Control AM/FM Stereo Cassette Dual Front Air Bags ABS (4-Wheel) Power Seat Consumer Rated Condition: Excellent "Excellent" condition means that the vehicle looks great, is in excellent mechanical condition and needs no reconditioning. It should pass a smog inspection. The engine compartment should be clean, with no fluid leaks. The paint is glossy and the body and interior are free of any wear or visible defects. There is no rust. The tires are the proper size and match and are new or nearly new. A clean title history is assumed. This is an exceptional vehicle. Private Party Value $19,780 Private Party value represents what you might expect to pay for a used car when purchasing from a private party. It may also represent the value you might expect to receive when selling your own used car to another private party. Adven.serr.e Found that new ca http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.dlllkw.kc.ur?kbb. CA;424171;CA065 &925 83 ;sed+p&722;Ford; 2004%... 5/17/2004 AGENDA ITEM S•1,g June 3, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Peter A. Cosentini, City Manager SUBJECT: Eastern Municipal Water District - Sewer Negotiations RECOMMENDATION: The Council Water/Sewer Subcommittee and the City Manager recommend that the City Council support in the negotiating position of expanding the City's Sewer collection line maintenance function to include the newly developing areas of the city. BACKGROUND: As the Council is aware, the Council Water/Sewer Subcommittee has been considering City's negotiating position with EMWD, in regards to the City's sewer service agreement with EMWD. EMWD has an agreement to perform the processing of sewer waste generated in the City. Per our agreement, it is stated that the city can do sewer maintenance in our collection systems, within our City limits, which would include the newly developed areas. For some unknown reason, historically, the City has not pressed this issue with EMWD, and EMWD has provided sewer collection line maintenance within the newly incorporated areas of the city. The attached report was reviewed by the Council Sub -Committee, and the Sub -Committee recommends having the City, through its own staff, provide the sewer collection line maintenance in the new developments. The attached report identifies the financial advantage of providing this service to our own citizens. We propose that this position became a prospective condition of approval for all new tentative tract maps, thus avoiding the cost of buying any facilities from EMWD, which up to this date EMWD has secured from prior developments. However, EMWD may be willing to give some of these isolated tracts' sewer infrastructure in order to round out its sewer service boundaries. We will explore this alternative with EMWD staff through negotiations. Page 1 of 2 Attached is the fiscal analysis prepared by Stetson Engineering who is helping us with our Water and Sewer Master Plan. The analysis indicates that expansion is one of the most desirable financial positions to pursue. JUSTIFICATION: Future planning and financial stability of the City's Sewer Enterprise Fund, and legal financial support of the City's general fund overhead costs. BUDGETARY IMPACT: No impact at this time. ATTACHMENTS: 1. City of San Jacinto Cost Analysis for Sewer Options Page 2 of 2 DISCUSSION DRAFT (Revised May 13, 2004) CITY OF SAN JACINTO COST ANALYSIS: SEWER OPTIONS OPTION 1: STATUS QUO Option 1: BASE CASE- Continue service within City boundaries and extend the current agreement between San Jacinto, Lake Hemet, and EMWD for San Jacinto to serve areas outside the city. EMWD continues to provide sewer service in all the growth areas. The table below shows the City's revenues and expenses, which were provided by City staff. The City's revenues are generated from monthly fees from the City's sewer services customers, fees from EMWD area sewer service, and interest, penalties, and miscellaneous income. The City's expenses are from City allocated employee accounts (salaries, insurance, benefits, etc.) and operation and maintenance accounts (capital improvements, supplies, maintenance, etc.). Budget Projected Actual Actual 2003-04 2002-03 2001-02 2000-01 San Jacinto Revenues $310,000.00 $287,118.64 $280,096.00 $298,296.00 San Jacinto Expenses $256,258.00 $249,190.00 $183,191.00 $273,682.00 Net $ 53,742.00 $ 37,928.64 $ 96,905.00 $ 24,614.00 It is difficult to evaluate and analyze the expense information provided, because these expense figures are so inconsistent. For example, the 2000-01 expenses appear to be high, indicating very unusual expense or possible incorrect allocation. The following fiscal year (2001-02), expenses dropped by nearly $100,000, which appears to be too low. City staff was questioned whether the erratic expense information might be due to accounting errors, loss of staff, major improvements, etc. However, no explanation is currently available. The breakdown of the expenses (provided by the City) indicates there was about $42,000 worth of capital improvements in 2000-01 and there were no capital improvements in 2001-02, 2002-03. We have concluded that after reviewing the available data, any evaluation should be focused on 2002-03 and 2003-04 data and projections. As a starting point for the evaluation, it is recommended the City set aside a replacement fund each year. In 1990-91, the estimated asset value of the sewer utility's property, buildings, and equipment is $1.45 million and the estimated number of connections is about 7,000. The value per connection in 1990-91 was about $210 ($1.45 million/7,000). Using the current number of connections (about 8,800), indexed to April 2004, the estimated 2004 value is $2.7 million. Assuming 60 years replacement, the City should set aside funds for capital replacement of about 1/60 of the value, which is about $45,000 each fiscal year. For the City's 2003-04 expense budget, it appears that the City included a capital "improvements" cost of $25,000. It is assumed that the $25,000 is not funds "set aside" for capital replacement. In addition, the City budgets an annual expense of about $25,000 for overhead costs, but does not appear to set aside unused funds. The fiscal year 2002-03 and 2003-04 information indicates the City is experiencing and expecting an average net revenue of about $45,000. For a financially stable sewer system, the City needs to budget for capital improvement of about $45,000 each fiscal year and be prepared to carryover and set aside any unused revenue in a capital replacement fund. We have selected two scenarios to estimate the present worth since the economy of scale is not known. One, the City's current unit cost of operation is equal to the City's future unit cost of operation (no economy of scale). Two, the City's future unit cost of operation is assumed to be reduced to 80% of existing, due to economy of scale. For each scenario, we have assumed sewer revenue (rates) and expenses will increase at 3 percent per year, beginning in year 2. Scenario 1: In this scenario, we have been advised that within the current service area, 3,500 new units will be connected over the next 20 years and have assumed they will be installed in equal amounts each year. If it is assumed the City continues to meet annual expenses, i.e., no economy of scale, and only increases rates to cover increased operating costs, then annual expenses will be about $261,000 in the first year. The net revenue in that year would be about $56,000 ($317,000 - $261,000) as shown on Table 1. Assuming $45,000 is set aside each year for capital replacement, then the remaining net revenue in the first year would be about $11,000 ($56,000-$45,000). Over 20 years, with an interest rate of 6 percent, the present worth of the net revenue, excluding capital replacement, is about $680,000. The total present worth of the sewer system is about $4 million ($2.7 million for existing system + $1.3 million for new system) and the City would receive an annual income of about $11,000 in the first year, increasing to $167,000 in the 20th year (present value of the income stream is $680,000). Scenario 2: In this scenario, we have been advised that within the current service area, 3,500 new units will be connected over the next 20 years and have assumed they will be installed in equal amounts each year. If it is assumed the City's future unit operational expenses are 80 percent of the current costs, due to economy of scale, then annual expenses will reduce to about $260,000 in the first year. The net revenue in that year would be about $57,000 ($317,000 - $260,000) as shown on Table 2. Assuming $45,000 is set aside each year for capital replacement, then the remaining net revenue in the first year would be about $12,000 ($57,000-$45,000). Over 20 years, with an interest rate of 6 percent, the present worth of the net revenue, excluding capital replacement, is about $802,000. The total present worth of the sewer system is $4 million ($2.7 million for existing system + $1.3 million for new system) and the City would receive an annual income of about $12,000 in the first year, increasing to $195,000 in the 20th year (present value of the income stream is $802,000). Assumptions: Value of current system is approximate; a more complete, thorough valuation should be conducted. No information is available on potential operational cost savings v. a rate increase to balance the books. Replacement of system is estimated to be 60 years. Accounting and allocation of expenses are accurate. CITY OF SAN JACINTO COST ANALYSIS: SEWER OPTIONS OPTION 2: EXPAND Option 2: Have the City acquire as many of the new tracts as possible and consolidate fractured area by trades with EMWD. The expected benefit of this Option is a reduced unit cost of operations, i.e. economy of scale for operation. Since the anticipated economy of scale is not known, we have selected three scenarios to estimate the present worth. One, the City's current unit cost of operation is equal to the City's future unit cost of operation (no economy of scale). Two, the City's future unit cost of operation is assumed to be reduced to 80% of existing, due to economy of scale. Three, the City's unit cost of operation future is assumed to be reduced to 60% of existing, due to economy of scale. For each scenario, we have assumed sewer revenue and expenses will increase at 3 percent per year, beginning in year 2. Scenario 1: If it is assumed the City continues to meet annual expenses, i.e., no economy of scale, and only rate increases to cover increased operating costs, then the present worth of the sewer system is the current $2.7 million, plus the present value of developer contributed sewer facilities and net annual income. We have assumed the 21,000 new units of developer -contributed facilities are installed in equal segments over the next 20 years and about 2 percent inflation each year, as shown on Table 3. There is $45,000 set aside funds each year for capital replacement. The value of new facilities is expected to cost about $8.2 million in current dollars. The total present value is about $10.9 million ($2.7 million + $8.2 million) and the annual income starts at $23,000 and reaches $74,000 after year 20 (present value is $469,000). Scenario 2: In this scenario, it is assumed the 21,000 new units will be constructed in equal amounts over the next 20 years. If it is assumed the City's future unit operational expenses are 80 percent of the current costs, due to economy of scale, then annual expenses will reduce to about $229,000 in the first year. The gross revenue in that year would be about $125,000 ($354,000 - $229,000) as shown on Table 4. There is $45,000 set aside funds each year for capital replacement. Then the net revenue in the first year would be about $80,000 ($125,000-$45,000). For 20 years with an interest rate of 6 percent, the present worth of the net revenue is about $2.4 million. Then the total present worth of the sewer system is $10.9 million ($2.7 million for existing system + $8.2 million for new system) and the City would receive an annual income of about $80,000 in the first year, increasing to $468,000 in the 20th year (present value is $2,400,000). Scenario 3: In this scenario it is assumed the 21,000 new units will be constructed in equal amounts over the next 20 years. If it is assumed the City's future unit operational expenses are 60 percent of the current costs, due to economy of scale, then annual expenses will reduce to about $172,000 in the first year. The gross revenue in that year would be about $182,000 ($354,000 - $172,000) as shown on Table 5. There is $45,000 set aside funds each year for capital replacement. Then the net revenue in the first year would be about $137,000 ($182,000-$45,000). For 20 years, with an interest rate of 6 percent, the present worth of the net revenue is about $4 million. Then the total present worth of the sewer system is $10.9 million ($2.7 million for existing system + $8.2 million for new system) and the City would receive an annual income of about $137,000 in the first year, increasing to $862,000 in the 20th year (present value is $4.3 million). CITY OF SAN JACINTO COST ANALYSIS: SEWER OPTIONS OPTION 3: DISBAND Option 3: Sell existing and future collection systems to EMWD. Use "Hemet Deal" payment stream to fund purchase by EMWD, use $2.00/connectionlmonth and $2.50/connection/month for comparison. No annual rate increase. $ 2.00 / connection / month It is assumed the present value of the City's sewer system is $2.7 million. "Hemet Deal" payment is $2.00/connection/month to fund EMWD purchase of system. There are approximately 8,809 service connections in San Jacinto's sewer area. The City will receive: $211,416/year (8,809 customers x $2.00 x 12 months). Assuming a 6 percent interest rate, the repayment period for $2.7 million is about 25 years. $ 2.50 / connection / month It is assumed the present value of the City's sewer system is $2.7 million. "Hemet Deal" payment is $2.50/connection/month to fund EMWD purchase of system. There are approximately 8,809 service connections in San Jacinto's sewer area. The City will receive: $264,270/year (8,809 customers x $2.50 x 12 months). Assuming a 6 percent interest rate, the repayment period for $2.7 million is about 16 years. Assumptions: - EMWD pays City only for all 8,809 customers. - Value of current system ($2.7 million) is approximate; a more complete, thorough valuation should be conducted. SUMMARY Stetson has reviewed the three options, which were posed by the City, i.e., (1) status quo, (2) serve all new customers, or (3) sell the system. Due to limited data, Stetson made numerous assumptions in our evaluation. It appears the following general conclusions may be made. 1. Maintaining status quo will provide the City and providing service to the projected growth of 3,500 new units will increase the present worth of the system to about $4.0 million assuming 20 years of development. Depending on the expense/economy of scale scenarios, the annual revenue stream will vary. Under Scenario 1, there will be a net annual income of about $11,000 in the first year, increasing to $167,000 in the 20th year. Scenario 2 net revenue will increase from about $12,000 in the first year to about $195,000 per year in the 20th year. Therefore, by holding the existing sewer system and increasing rates, this will enhance the value of physical facilities by several million dollars and can receive a net revenue from economy of scale and annual rate increases at the end of year 1 ranging from $11,000 to $12,000 and increasing in year 20 to between $167,000 and $195,000. 2. Serving the future development within the City will increase the present worth of the system to about $10.9 million assuming 20 years of development. Depending on the expense/economy of scale scenarios, the annual revenue stream will vary. Under Scenario 1, net revenue in the first year will increase from $23,000 to about $74,000 in the 20th year. Scenario 2 net revenue will increase from about $54,800 per year to about $416,000 per year in the 20th year. Under Scenario 3, net revenue will increase from about $144,000 to about $868,000 in the 20th year. Therefore, by holding/expanding the sewer system and increasing rates, this will enhance the value of physical facilities by several million dollars and can receive a net revenue ranging from $23,000 to $144,000 and increasing in year 20 to between $26,000 and $868,000. 3. Abandoning the sewer system could provide a revenue stream of about $211,416 per year for 16 years ($2.00/connection) or about $264,270 per year for about 11 years ($2.50lconnection). 4. It appears that options 1 or 2 provide the best financial opportunities for the City, particularly in the future if potential economies of scale can be realized. In addition, the future revenue from sale of the sewer system will cease while revenue under options 1 and 2 will continue/increase. J:\Jobs\1935102\CITY OF SAN JACINTO COST ANALYSIS 4.doc DISCUSSION DRAFT TABLE 1 CITY OF SAN JACINTO COST ANALYSIS OPTION 1: SCENARIO 1, NO ECONOMY OF SCALE Expense 4! Gross Revenue Cap. Rest. Net Revenue Cost of New Facility 51 Present Worth Factor Present Worth Year Customers 1/ Rate 2/ Revenue 31 Net Revenue t New Facilities Total $ 261,075 $ 56,275 $ 45,000 $ 11,275 $ 98,900 0.9434 $ 10,837 $ 91,415 $ 1132,052 1 8984 3.50 $ 317,350 2 9159 3.61 $ 334,441 $ 274,135 $ 60,307 $ 45,000 $ 15,307 $ 98,838 0.8900 $ 13,623 $ 87,966 $ 101,589 3 9334 3.71 $ 352,272 $ 287,586 $ 64,888 $ 45,000 $ 19,686 $ 100,815 0.8398 $ 18,528 $ 84,844 $ 101,172 4 9509 3.82 $ 370,872 $ 301,441 $ 69,431 $ 45,000 $ 24,431 $ 102,831 0.7921 $ 19,352 $ 81,452 $ 100,804 5 9684 3.94 $ 390,270 $ 315,711 $ 74,559 $ 45,000 $ 29,559 $ 104,888 0.7473 $ 22,090 $ 78,383 $ 100,472 8 9859 4.06 $ 410,499 $ 330,410 $ 80,089 $ 45,000 $ 35,089 $ 106,985 0.7050 $ 24,738 $ 75,425 $ 100,183 7 10034 4.18 $ 431,590 $ 345,549 $ 86,041 $ 45,000 $ 41,041 $ 109,125 0.6651 5 27,296 $ 72,579 $ 99,876 8 10209 4.30 $ 453,577 $ 381,143 $ 92,435 $ 45,000 $ 47,435 $ 111,308 0.6274 $ 29,760 $ 69,834 $ 99,595 9 10384 4.43 $ 478,498 $ 377,204 $ 99,291 $ 46,000 $ 54,291 $ 113,534 0.5919 $ 32,135 $ 67,201 $ 99,336 10 10559 4.57 $ 500,381 $ 393,7413 $ 108,833 $ 45,000 $ 61,633 $ 115,804 0.5584 $ 34,416 $ 84,885 $ 99,081 11 10734 4.70 $ 525,270 $ 410,788 $ 114,482 $ 45,000 $ 89,482 $ 118,121 0.5268 $ 38,803 $ 62,226 $ 98,829 12 10909 4.84 $ 551,202 $ 428,338 $ 122,884 $ 45,000 $ 77,864 5 120,483 0.4970 $ 38,698 $ 59,880 $ 98,578 13 11084 4.99 $ 578,217 $ 446,416 $ 131,802 $ 45,000 $ 86,802 $ 122,893 0.4688 $ 40,893 $ 57,812 $ 98,305 14 11259 5.14 $ 606,358 5 465,0313 $ 141,322 $ 45,000 $ 98,322 $ 125,350 0.4423 $ 42,803 $ 55,443 $ 98,046 15 11434 5.29 $ 635,666 $ 484,214 $ 151,452 $ 45,000 $ 106,452 $ 127,857 0.4173 $ 44,422 $ 53,355 $ 97,777 16 11609 5.45 $ 666,187 $ 503,968 $ 182,219 $ 45,000 $ 117,219 $ 130,415 0.3938 $ 48,138 $ 51,331 $ 97,469 17 11784 5.62 5 1397,967 $ 524,314 $ 173,653 $ 45,000 $ 128,653 $ 133,023 0.3714 $ 47,782 5 49,405 $ 97,187 18 11959 5.78 $ 731,055 $ 545,270 $ 185,784 $ 45,000 $ 140,784 $ 135,683 0.3503 $ 49,317 $ 47.530 $ 98,847 19 12134 5.96 $ 765,499 $ 588,858 $ 188,643 $ 45,000 $ 153,643 $ 138,397 0.3305 $ 50,779 $ 45,740 $ 98,519 20 12309 6.14 $ 801,352 $ 589,089 5 212,284 $ 45,000 $ 187,264 $ 141,165 0.3118 $ 52,153 $ 44,015 $ 96,168 GRAND TOTAL $ 1/ 8,809 customers plus additional 175 customers over next 20 years 2/ Assumes rates start at $3.50/customerlmonth and Increases 3% each year due to cost of Ilvingloperation expenses only. 31 Assumes 175 new customers added tc 2003-04 Revenue 4/ Assumes expense Increases at 3 percent per year equal to revenue increase. 5/ Assumes 1/20 of $1.9 million and 2% Increase thereafter T:Vobs1111351O2'cost analyse table 415haetl 679,762 $ 1,300,101 $ 1,979,883 DISCUSSION DRAFT TABLE 2 CITY OF SAN JACINTO COST ANALYSIS OPTION 1: SCENARIO 2, FUTURE COST IS S0% OF EXISTING COST Revenue 3/ Ex ense 41 Gross Revenue Cap. Rept. Net Revenue Cost of New Facility 6/ _I Present Worth Factor Present Worth Customers 1/ Rate 2/ I Net Revenue New Facilities Total Year $ 280,060 $ 57,290 $ 45,000 $ 12,290 $ 96,900 0.9434 $ 11,594 5 91,415 $ 103,010 1 8984 3.50 $ 317,350 2 9159 3.61 $ 334,441 $ 272,044 $ 82,397 $ 45,000 $ 17,397 $ 98,838 0.8900 $ 15,484 $ 87,968 $ 103,450 3 9334 3.71 $ 352,272 $ 284,387 $ 67,885 $ 45,000 $ 22,885 6 100,815 0.8396 $ 19,214 $ 84,644 $ 103,858 4 9509 3.82 $ 370,872 $ 297,100 $ 73,771 $ 45,000 $ 28,771 $ 102,831 0.7921 5 22.790 $ 81,452 $ 104,242 5 9884 3.94 $ 390,270 $ 310,195 $ 80,075 $ 45,000 $ 35,075 $ 104,888 0.7473 $ 28,212 $ 78,383 $ 104,594 6 9859 4.08 $ 410,499 $ 323,683 $ 86,816 $ 45,000 $ 41,816 $ 106,985 0.7050 $ 29,481 $ 75,425 $ 104,905 7 10034 4.18 $ 431,590 $ 337,575 $ 94,015 $ 45,000 $ 49,015 $ 109.125 0.6651 $ 32,600 $ 72,579 $ 105,179 8 10209 4.30 $ 453,577 $ 351,884 $ 101,694 $ 45,000 $ 56,694 $ 111,308 0.6274 $ 35,570 $ 69,834 $ 105,404 9 10384 4.43 $ 476,496 $ 366,622 5 109,873 $ 45,000 $ 84,873 $ 113,534 0.5919 $ 38,399 $ 67,201 $ 105,599 10 10559 4.57 $ 500,381 $ 381,803 $ 118,578 $ 45,000 $ 73,578 $ 115,804 0.5584 $ 41,086 $ 64,665 $ 105,751 11 10734 4.70 $ 525,27D $ 397,439 $ 127,831 $ 45,000 $ 82,831 $ 118,121 0.5268 $ 43,635 5 82,226 $ 105,861 12 10909 4.84 $ 551,202 $ 413,544 $ 137,658 $ 45,000 5 92,658 $ 120,483 0.4970 $ 48,051 $ 59,880 $ 105,931 13 11084 4.99 $ 578,217 $ 430,132 $ 148,086 $ 45,000 $ 103,086 $ 122,893 0.4688 $ 48,327 $ 57,612 $ 105,939 14 11259 5.14 $ 606,358 $ 447,217 $ 159,140 $ 45,000 $ 114,140 $ 125,350 0.4423 $ 50,484 $ 55,443 $ 105,927 15 11434 5.29 $ 635,866 $ 464,618 $ 170,850 $ 45,000 $ 125,850 $ 127,857 0.4173 $ 52,517 $ 53,355 $ 105,872 18 11609 5.45 $ 866,187 $ 482,942 $ 183,245 $ 45,000 $ 138,245 $ 130,415 0.3938 $ 54,413 $ 51,331 $ 105,744 17 11784 5.82 $ 697,967 $ 501,612 $ 196,355 $ 45,000 $ 151,355 $ 133,023 0.3714 $ 56,213 $ 49,405 $ 105,618 18 11959 5.78 $ 731,055 $ 520,842 $ 210,212 $ 45,000 $ 165.212 $ 135,683 0.3503 $ 57,874 $ 47,530 $ 105,404 19 12134 5.96 $ 765,499 5 540,649 $ 224,850 $ 45,000 $ 179,850 $ 138,387 0.3305 $ 59,440 5 45,740 $ 105,181 20 12309 8.14 $ 801,352 $ 581,051 $ 240,302 $ 45,000 $ 195,302 $ 141,165 0.3118 $ 60,895 $ 44,015 5 104,910 GRAND TOTAL $ 1/ 8,809 customers plus additional 175 customers over next 20 years 2l Assumes rates start at $3.50/customer/month and Increases 3% each year due to cost of living/operation expenses only. 31 Assumes future expense Is 80% of existing expense due to economy of scale. 4/ Assumes 1/20 of $1.9 million and 2% Increase thereafter TMoos\1 a35102\cost analysis table 44Sheo12 802,279 $ 1,300,101 $ 2,102,381 DISCUSSION DRAFT TABLE 4 CITY OF SAN JACINTO COST ANALYSIS OPTION 2: SCENARIO 2, EXPENSE IS 80% OF REVENUE Expense 31 Grose Revenue Cap. Repl. Net Revenue Cost of New Facility 41 Present Worth Factor Present Worth Year Customers 11 Rate 21 Revenue Net Revenue I New Facilities L Total I $ 229,180 $ 124,940 $ 45,000 $ 79,940 $ 612,000 0.9434 $ 76,415 $ 577,361 $ 652,776 1 9859 3.50 $ 354,100 2 10909 3.61 $ 410,146 $ 272,373 $ 137,773 $ 45,000 $ 92,773 $ 624,240 0.8900 $ 82,568 5 555,574 $ 638,141 3 11959 3.71 $ 469,236 $ 317,973 $ 151,263 $ 45,000 $ 106,263 $ 636,725 0.8396 $ 89,219 $ 534,594 $ 623,813 4 13009 3.82 $ 531,502 $ 366,064 $ 165,439 $ 45,000 $ 120,439 $ 649,459 0.7921 $ 95,400 $ 514,437 $ 609,836 5 14059 3.94 $ 597,082 $ 416,753 5 180,329 $ 45,000 $ 135,329 $ 662,448 0.7473 $ 101,131 5 495,048 $ 596,179 6 15109 4.08 $ 668,119 $ 470,155 $ 195,964 $ 45,000 $ 150,964 $ 675,697 0.7050 $ 106,429 $ 476,367 $ 582,796 7 16159 4.18 $ 738,760 $ 526,388 $ 212,374 $ 45,000 $ 167,374 $ 689,211 0.6651 $ 111,321 $ 458,395 $ 569,715 8 17209 4.30 $ 815,160 $ 585,568 $ 229,593 $ 45,000 $ 184,593 $ 702,996 0.6274 $ 115,814 $ 441,059 $ 556,873 9 18259 4.43 $ 895,480 $ 647,826 $ 247,664 $ 45,000 $ 202,654 $ 717,056 0.5919 $ 119,951 $ 424,425 $ 544,376 10 19309 4.57 $ 979,885 $ 713,293 $ 266,591 $ 45,000 $ 221,591 $ 731,397 0.5584 $ 123,737 $ 408,412 $ 532,148 11 20359 4.70 $ 1,068,548 $ 782,106 $ 286,442 $ 45,000 $ 241,442 5 746,025 0.5268 $ 127,192 $ 393,006 $ 620,198 12 21409 4.84 $ 1,161,649 $ 854,405 $ 307,245 $ 45,000 $ 262,245 $ 760,945 0.4970 $ 130,336 $ 378,190 $ 508,525 13 22459 4.99 $ 1,259,375 $ 930,337 $ 329.037 $ 45,000 $ 284,037 $ 776,164 0.4688 $ 133,157 $ 363,866 5 497,022 14 23509 5.14 $ 1,361,918 $ 1,010,057 $ 351,861 $ 45,000 $ 306.861 $ 791,687 0.4423 $ 135,724 $ 350,163 $ 485,888 15 24559 5.29 $ 1,469,481 $ 1,093,723 $ 375,758 $ 45,000 $ 330,758 $ 807,521 0.4173 $ 138,025 $ 336,979 $ 475.004 18 25609 5.45 $ 1,582,272 $ 1,181,500 5 400,772 $ 45,000 $ 355,772 $ 823,671 0.3936 $ 140,032 $ 324,197 $ 464,229 17 26659 5.82 $ 1,700,507 $ 1,273,559 $ 426,948 $ 45,000 $ 3131,948 $ 840,145 0.3714 $ 141,856 $ 312,030 $ 453,885 18 27709 5.78 $ 1,824,413 $ 1,370,078 $ 454,335 $ 45,000 $ 409,335 $ 856,948 0.3503 $ 143,390 $ 300,1139 $ 443,579 19 28759 5.98 $ 1,954,223 $ 1,471,243 $ 482,980 $ 45,000 $ 437,980 $ 874,087 0.3305 $ 144,752 $ 288,8136 $ 433,638 20 29809 8.14 $ 2,090,179 $ 1,577244 $ 512,936 $ 45,000 $ 467,936 $ 891,568 0.3118 $ 145,902 $ 277,991 $ 423,893 GRAND TOTAL $ 2,401,349 $ 11 8,809 customers plus additional 1,050 customers over next 20 years 2/ Assumes rates start at $3.50/customer/month and increases 3% each year due to cost of living/operation expenses only. 31 Assumes expense Is 80% of revenue due to economy of scale 41 Assumes 1/20 of 512 million and 2% Increase thereafter T:Uoba\1935\a2toat analysis table 21Sheet2 8,211,186 $ 10.612,515 AGENDA ITEM $__ /. /o June 3, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council y FROM: Tim Hults, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit 1-04 — Clustered Wireless Telecommunication Facility Location: 1283 Ramona Expressway — North side of Ramona Expressway between Chase Street and Potter Road Applicant: Brian Cook and Associates 6466 Ambrosia Dr; Suite 5315 San Diego, CA 92124 RECOMMENDATION: Ratify the Approval of Conditional Use Permit 1-04, based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval, to allow the installation of a clustered wireless telecommunication facility, consisting of two 45-foot high fully stealthed mono - palms to be located at the northeast corner of a 2.65 acre commercial parcel at 1283 Ramona Expressway. BACKGROUND: On May 13, 2004 the Planning Commission approved a proposal by Anthem Telecomm to construct on a 55' x 55' leased an unmanned clustered wireless telecommunication facility. The facility consists of two 45-foot high stealthed mono -palms each with a three panel array located on the palm ball and a three panel array in the trunk of the tree. Also proposed, are two 11'x20'x10' equipment shelters and two 10' x 10' equipment pads. The Planning Commission adopted a resolution approving the project with the condition that no rack mounted antenna array would be located in the palm fronds of the two mono -palms. This facility will be truly stealthed, no antenna arrays will be seen on either palms from any direction. The Commission also added conditions replacing the two proposed 10-foot high live palm trees with two 20-foot high trees. When completed, the facility will be surrounded by two 15-foot high palm trees and two 20-foot high palm trees and a specimen sized tree to screen the proposed 6-foot high split face block wall. Page 1 of 5 Approv City Manager: Finance Director: The project is located on a 55'x 55' pad approximately 400 feet from the Ramona Expressway and is adjacent to a combination of 30 to 50 foot high pine and pepper trees and an existing steel storage building. The area is currently used for a mix of residential and commercial uses. The cellular provider requires 24- hour access for maintenance and repairs. As such, the site will be accessed from Ramona Expressway through the existing residential driveway. Since the Ramona Expressway is a Caltrans maintained roadway, improvements made necessary by this project shall include a paved access and improvements to Ramona Expressway which would allow turning into the existing residential driveway. Plan for those improvements shall be approved by Caltrans. The applicant indicated that the major draw back for the facility as approved, is that facilities of this type have a small coverage area and are typically used to fill spot dead zones. A typical rack mounted antenna array provides greater coverage thus requiring fewer facilities and would obviously be more marketable to those service providers who wish to locate at this facility. More recently, the applicant inquired as to the process of amending the CUP to permit the rack mounted array. JUSTIFICATION: A Clustered Wireless Telecommunication Facility with mono -palms is a conditionally permitted use in the C-2 zone BUDGETARY IMPACT: None anticipated ATTACHMENTS: 1— Original Site Plan Package 1— Original Site Photo simulation 1— Original Mono -Palm Photo 1— Original Palm Frond Detail 1—Approved Mono -Palm Design Photos 1— Current Zoning Map 1— Planning Commission Conditions of Approval 1— Draft Planning Commission Resolution approving CUP 1-04 Page 2 of 5 AN VICINITY MAP a 54N JACINTO COLNTr VICINITY HAP: RECORD RD. BLODGETT ST. SITE `9LOCA11ON SCALE: N15 DRIVING DIRECTIONS TO SITE L START M GOING NLPtTN ON T-IOROUGNBF-ED LN. TOWARD TIRES CERRIT09 AVE- ( 0.09 HIL 2. TURN LEFTGNTO TREE CERRTOS AVE (®JI MILES) 3. EMI LEFT ONTO NYATT AVE (0A55 MILES, A. TURN LEFT ONTO DECCNSNIRE AVE IODI MILES) 5. TURN RIGHT ONTO LOS RANCNERIAS RD, (051 MILES) 6. TURN LEFT ONTO ILL FLORIDA AVEJCA-14/CA-SS (051 MILES) 1. TURN LEFT ONTO 5A5V111. .N AVE 4531 MILES) B. RAMONA DORT. (2D9 MILES) LEGAL DESCRIPTION ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO4 43I-040-053-2 WA SITE NAME: RAMONA EXPRESSWAY SITE NUMBER: CA - PROJECT DATA sITE ADDRESS: SITE NAME: RAMONA EXPREsSNAr RAMCNA T SITE NUMBER: D53 RAMONA EMU,- SAN JACINTO. CA S25B2-2253 (15 WILDING DATA. .LPd°AILTI06 - ZONNGDESMA4LTKle CCEPERCW. ' APN . 431.040-053-2 OCCUPANCY. EMENDS TTPE CP CCLINS LAN TOTAL LEASE AREA. 3025 SG FT. GEODETIC COORDINATES: 6 LAITIIDE L0Y51111DE is 334316.2011 156856411' W NAD 53 GEODETIC i% DNATES ARE.4 COLNDN ATEE SYSTEM ZONE b. MNORIN AtERMAN DARN AS ESTABLISHED BT 1664 USCICS 4D 115CE PROJECT SUMMARY f • 5,It45T CF F43iT 9Cf{P NSTALLAIIOI ON AN PROPOSED 45' HO4OPAL3S um NEW A41F35445, NELTER, n) 5' TALL PALMS r, BEES. n) 5' TALL PALM TRESS, AHD 0A5LN E FA APPLICABLE CODE COMPLIANCE rl ALL WORK MD MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORED AND !STALLED N ACCORDANCE NTl10E OIRAIT Fs EDI1KW CF 11E FOLLOW. CODES A5 EXITED BT 0E LOCAL ECMEFE 11 A11110RITE5 NO114N4 N THESE PUNS D TO BE CODIFIED TO P921R *MK NOT COFOWING TO FIEM EWES. L CALIFORNIA AOMMSTR40VE CODE b. ANSI / EIA-Ill EF MILL 1RLE5 24 125) 2091 1 INFORM BUILDS* CODE 2001 2. CALFORNIA WILDS* CODES 2001 5 NOON& ELECTRICAL CODE 1001 ' 3. CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODES 2001 5 LOCAL *SLOW CODES 4. CALFOR'A IEOUNICAL CrOE5 2001 10. CITT / 0034TC ORDNAACES 5. GYJFORIA PL 0134E CODES 1501 ALONG WITH ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL AND STATE LAGS AND REGILATICNS. ACCESSABILITY EXCEMPTION F4CILIR IS UNNAMED AID NOT FOR 144141 NABITAOCN. NA DCAFFED AC' 4 REWIRE/1MS NOT f1 REWIRED, N ACCORDANCE 31114 CALFORNIA STATE A 1134 51RA0VE CODE. PART 2, TITLE 24, SECTION li A0553.42, EXCEPIICN L 41 60 /.5,—,A. ls;°' a` fi''l.,,,,, vi+'//.vo. �y r n: y /. /,....,%.iF/.vt/i../A3 ... ;. 1414r /44: 4 :-. APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE: ANDEI TE.EC01 TIM (#BI STREET, SUR 1 SAN FRAICISCO, CA SEM =WALT. MAN RXHNOD M M50235-515 FAX 14 f4611T6-5134 PROJECT CONTACT OIWER: BILL PLATSNGA JR. AND KAT J. 5LATINGA APPLICANT: ARDEN 1F1 Form T101 GITI2EN STREET, SURE 1 541 FRA1151500, CA ]W3 TEL (650) 35.5N5 FA* l4S/ 116-5T34 CONTACT: M ANSI EA11 COEALTNYy LLC CDEAC'S ALEXA DER E. B-ASSLTK MICR MIN 655.9206 PROJECT TEAM ARCH ITECTURAL/ENGINEERNG/SIVtVE TING ADVA IDED DESIMI COSLLT4114 LLC TH W. IWT£R L115TE 51O 0TOL CA. 5520S F.OFS) 413-4604 CONTACT. SALOICN MATINEE JR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: ANEE4 TELECOM '/L 4;443 341: d£%/'tlYliL/i//�,�/64I40 /f6f6Y/// SHEET INDEX SLEET DESWtlPTKN T-I TIRE SLEET C4 SITE 51R 51 41 SITE PLAID A-2 ELEVATOE ADC ADVANCED DES CONSULTANTS,I Ptarrig EBpssiq Se( 1755 W Hammer In 5 Stockton, G. 95201 Ph: 209-47E-4600 Fax: 209-42E 463: ANTHEM TELECO LLC 2701 GREEN STREET, SUITE 7 SAN FRANSISCO, CA. TEL: 650.315.5145 FAX' 415.776.5734 RAMONA EXPRE 1283 RAMONA EXPR SAN JACINTO. CA. CURRENT ISSUE 1 .30.0 ISSUED FOR: 100% ZONII APPROVALS EASING' ZONING RF ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION TAG CHECK OWNER: PROJECT NO DRAWN BY I CACI CHECKED BY SAL SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEE SHEET NUMBER T-1 1st SUBMITTAL: . 2nd SUBMITTAL:. FILE NAME: — uw,l H06)SZ SITE PLAN IE? ACCESS ROAD EASMENT LWEsrocx PEN IriEs10Oc PEN FENCE (E)5'RCN MODEM FENCE UVESTDc( PEN u1EsroCt PEN FENCE \ (E) 5' RAN WIRE • FENCE � n (P) 15' HIGH PALM TREE \ (F) (12) PANEL ANTENNAS, PER RAO. \ CENTERS (2), AZIMUTH k \RAD. CENTER. T.B.D. \ Ep \` F (P) DUCK —BILL OPEN GATE HOLDER (TIP OF 2) (P) (2) 6' HIGH, 6' WIDE GATES W/3 STRANDS OF BARBED WIRE (1YP OF 2) (P) UDULIES SERVICES PEDESTAL APPLETON PLUG (I(P) (P) GRAVEL 3' THICK MIN. W/GEOTEXTILE FABRIC EXTENDED TO 1' OUTSIDE FENCE UNE (P) 6' HIGH CHUN UNK FENCE W/3 STRANDS OF BARBED WIRE (TIP) (P) 55' X 55' LEASE AREA (3625 5O. FL.) \ (P) 15' HIGH PALM TREE— (P) 10' NIGH PALL TREE (P) GRAVEL WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC EXTENDED TO 1' nuranr (P) IB' WIDE WAVEGUIDE BRIDGE (1YP.) (P) 10' HIGH PALM TREE ry��i e4, - 1�-30'—SO' HIGH TREES (E) METAL ROOF 0 16' AG1. SCALE: 1 10' ADC.. ADUIHCED Iles CONSULTANTS.1 RAmiN EEalsi99aiq Se 1755 W Hammer Ln 5 Stockton, CA. 96209. Ph: 209-416-460. Fax: 209-478-463 ANTHEM TELECC LLC 2701 GREEN STREET, SUITE 7 SAN FRANSISCO. CA. TEL: 650.315.51 45 FAX: 415.776.5734 RAMONA EXPRE 1283 RAMONA EXPI SAN JACINTO, CA. CURRENT ISSUE 1 .30.0 ISSUED FOR: 100% ZON APPROVALS LEASING' ZONING: RF ENGINEER: CONSTRUC110N. TAG CHECK - OWNER, PROJECT NO DRAWN BY 1 CA CHECKED BY SAI mom mrAsinimmi SHEET TITLE SITE LAY( SHEET NUMBER A-1 1st SUBMITTAL: 2nd SUBMITTAL:. FILE NAME: — TOP OF MOPOPAOA 40-OF (P) (1E) ANTENNAS (3) SECTORS ( I ) FUTURE PER SECTOR RAO. CENTER 0 45' ,...Le__ANTENNAS RAD EDGER NEW PANEL ANTENNAS ENCLBSED IN PALM PALL (P) BOTTOM OF GAFF PALM BALL 0 32°- r (P) 1 l'-aF X 21X-DF EQUIPMENT SHELIER (BEFONO) (P) 15° ii1Gli PA.1.(.4 TREE (P) C1100 URK FENCE w/3 smmas Of RAPPED OW) (P) 10 2 10 POP/NENE PAD O-R RC.L FINISHED FLOOR 1-'11 , `f•t:-z:•• (P) LIONOKLIA (P) 10' MCP FAN 'RCE (F) 8 WE WAVEGENDE BRIDGE (P) GPS UPIPF (PAP OF 2)— (P) IN-0 3 20-0 EBUIPMENT SHELTER (P) kPPLETON P1JJG SOUTH EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1°00' CENTER OF PROPOSED TOWER LATITUDE NORTH 33'48'36.20" LONGITUDE: WEST 116'58'56.07" NAD 83 N 2239162.45 E 6339236.67 GROUND ELEVATION: /494.5 (NAVD 88) THE HORIZONTAL ACCURACY OF THE LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE AT THE CENTER OF TOWER LOCATION FALLS WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) FEET. THE VERTICAL ACCURACY AT THE BASE OF THE TOWER FALLS WITHIN THREE (3) FEET. DATE OF SURVEY: 12-30-03 BASIS OF BEARINGS THE BASIS OF HORIZONTAL CONTROL FOR THIS SURVEY I5 THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983. PLANE COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE IN TERMS OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983, ZONE' 6. TITLE REPORT IDENTIFICATION: TITLE CO. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE CO. ORDER NO. 9767297 DATED: 12-1-03 ASSESSORS IDENTIFICATION: APN: 431-040-053 OWNER: BILL PLA TINGA JR. AND KAY J. PLATINGA Ex. GNp1N �1 E pp�0'' 16 30 94� 14e4.111 H. 79, 4 s LEGAL DESCRIPTION PER TITLE REPORT: THE SOUTHWESTERLY PORTION OF PARCEL 2 OF RS 54/72, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE, 5 47'30'14" W, 532.00 FT ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE, CONTINUING ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2, 5 47'30'14" W, 456.59 FT TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; SAID CORNER ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OR NORTHEASTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF IDYLLWILD DR.; AND ALSO BEING 11' SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF RAMONA EXPRESSWAY; THENCE, N 64'40'42" E, 541.21 FT ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE, S 32'28' 33" E, 236.51 FT, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS THAT PRRTION IN RAMONA EXPRESSWAY. ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 431-040-053-2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION LEASE BOUNDARY: A PORTION OF PARCEL 2 OF R5 54/72, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE THEREOF S 47'50'26" W, (RECORD S 47'30'14" W) 532.00 FT; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE, NORTH 32'08'21' WEST, 1.27 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 32'08'21" WEST, 55.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47'50'26" WEST, 55.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 32'08'21" EAST, 55.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47'50'26" EAST, 55.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. LEASE BOUNDARY CONTAINS 2978.86 SQUARE FEET OR 05 E p5A N 6 6' HIGH WOOD FENCE PART OF PARCEL 2 R/S 54/72 5' HIGH WIRE FENCE 2.65 acres apn 431-040-053 0 40' PARCEL 1 RS54/72 BOUNDARY DETAIL & VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1"=1C0' PROPOSED LEASE BOUNDARY SEE DETAIL Q�e f0 / CENTER OF PROPOSED TOWER LAT N 33'48'36.20" LONG W 116'58'56.07" GROUND EL: 1495.5 METAL BLDG ROOF 0 16' AGL 60' 120' O'24'08.57" IF SHEET IS LESS THAN 24" X 36" IT IS A REDUCED PRINT -SCALE REDUCED ACCORDINGLY PART OF PARCEL 2 R/S 54/72 2.65 acres spa 431-040-053 IRON PINS SET AT 4 CORNERS OF LEASE (TYP) EXCEPTION lO EXEMPTION DESCRIPTION A-B. ANY TAXES OR LIENS 01. RIGHT OF WAY 0 EASEMENT 0 EASEMENT 0 EASEMENT 0 EASEMENT O6. EASEMENT 0 DEED OF TRUST O DEED OF TRUST 0 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT AGREEMENT PARCEL 2 R554/72 PROPOSED LEASE AREA (SEE BOUNDARY DETAIL) / �6 ft° LEASE BOUNDARY DETAIL PARCEL 3 RS54/72 ITEMS PER TITLE REC. DATE N/A N/A 7/18/1885 9/29/1958 N/A 4-26-1973 12/5/1978 10/20/1978 7/25/2001 8/1/2001 N/A N/A SCALE:1"=20' REPORT REC. INFORMATION LOCATION N/A N/P (NOT PLOTTABLE) BOOK 43, P. 161 BOOK 52, P. 59 INST. NO. 69566 BOOK 54, P. 72 INST. NO. 53066 N0. 255491 INST. NO. 221336 INST. NO. 2001-345411 INST. NO. 01-360149 N/A N/A LOCATION N/P LOCATION LOCATION LOCATION LOCATION N/P N/P N/P N/P N/P ADC RDUDHCED DESIGN CONSULTRHTS, LLC PInNngancivelig Saila 1755 W Hammer Ln Ste 15 Stockton, CA. 95209-290D Ph: 209-97e-4601 Fax: 209-47e-4631 ANTHEM TELECOMA4, LLC 2701 GREEN STREET, SUITE 7 SAN FRANSISCO, CA. 941 23 TEL: 650.315.5145 FAX 415.775.5734 RAMONA EXPRESSWAl 1263 RAMONA EXPRESSWA SAN JACINTO, CA. CURRENT ISSUE DATE 1 .30.04 ISSUED FOR: 100% ZONING APPROVALS LEASING: DATE: ZONING: DATE:_ RF ENGINEER: DATE:_ CONSTRUCTION: DATE:_ TAG CHECK: DATE:_ OWNER: DATE:_ PROJECT NO DRAWN BY I CACHU JR CHECKED BY SHEET 1TTLE SAL MRTZ JR 90x ZONING REM `ONS 100% ZONING SITE SURVEY SHEET NUMBER C-1 1st SUBMITTAL: 2nd SUBMITTAL: FILE NAME: - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR AGENDA TIM HULTS REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL JUNE 3, 2004, 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Invocation — Rev. Bob Sauter, Faith Tabernacle, San Jacinto 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance 1.5 Special Presentations 1.5.1 Proclamation / Anna Martin — Cancer Research Fundraiser 1.5.2 Presentation by David Willmon — League of California Cities Representative 1.5.3 Presentation by Washington Representative Joni Goodman 1.5.4 Business Spotlight of the Month / Economic Development Specialist 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Now is the time for the public to address the Council on any subject within the jurisdiction of the City Council not listed on the agenda. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the City Council. 3. PUBLIC HEARING 3.1 Resolution No. IA Resolution approving future annexation of territory into Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 (CFD 2003-1) / Continued from May 20, 2004 / Approve / Special Tax Consultant and City Attorney City Council Agenda June 3, 2004 Page 2 of 4 4. CITY DEPARTMENTS 4.1 Council Goals Process / City Manager 4.2 Budget Hearing Fiscal Year 2004-2005 / Review and direct staff for final adoption June 17, 2004 / Finance Director and City Manager 5. CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by City Council Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Mayor,. state their name and address, and the consent calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. 5.1.1 Warrant Register for Warrants, Prepaid Checks, and Payroll Checks Period Ending 06/03/04 / Approve / Finance Director 5.1.2 Treasurer's Report at April 30, 2004 / Approve / Finance Director 5.1.3 Ordinance 04-13 /An Ordinance of the City Council acting as the Legislative body of Community Facilities District No. 2 authorizing the levy of a special tax within Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2 / Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance 04-13 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, acting as the Legislative Body of Community Facilities District No. 2 authorizing the levy of a special tax within community Facilities District No. 2 / Finance Director 5.1.4 Main Street, Soboba Road, Esplanade Avenue, and Artesia Street Pavement Rehabilitation / Award Public Works Contract to Matich Corporation of San Bernardino for the sum of $1,076,076 plus 15% contingency, Authorize City Clerk to reject all other bids received and Authorize Mayor to Execute the contract / City Engineer Public Works Bid Award 5.1.5 Spending Plan for the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund (SLESF) Grant (FY2003) / Approve / Chief of Police 5.1.6 Traffic Report at Intersection of Ramona Expressway and Eagle Drive / Adopt traffic report dated May 3, 2004 / Authorize implementation of recommendations as presented in the report / City Engineer City Council Agenda June 3, 2004 Page 3 of 4 5.1.7 Solid Waste Rate Increase / Approve tipping fee pass thru rate increase requested by CR&R Disposal / City Manager 5.1.8 Sale of City's Police vehicles to Riverside County Sheriffs Department / Approve sale of vehicles for the amount of $275,000 / City Manager 5.1.9 Eastern Municipal Water District Sewer Negotiations / Support City's negotiating position for expanding the City's sewer collection line maintenance function to include the newly developing areas of the City / City Manager 5.1.10 Conditional Use Permit 1-04 / Wireless Communications Facility / Ratify the approval of Planning Commission's Conditional Use Permit 1-04 based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval, allowing the construction of two 45-foot high fully stealthed mono-palms to be located at the northeast corner of a 2.65 acre commercial parcel at 1283 Ramona ExpressWay 5.1.11 Conditional Use Permit 12-03 / Construction of a 527 unit mini- storage facility / Ratify the approval of Conditional Use Permit 12- 03 based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval, allowing the construction of a 527 unit mini storage facility on a 75,000 square foot parcel, located within a multi-tenant mixed use commercial/industrial complex at the southwest corner of Esplanade Avenue and Santa Fe Avenue 6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS None 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representative: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Police Officers Association 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR Agency designated representative: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Sergeants Association 7.3 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representative: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Management Association City Council Agenda June 3, 2004 Page 4 of 4 7.4 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9: (One case) 8. ADJOURNMENT If you challenge any action of the City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council (c/o the City Clerk) at, or prior to, the public hearing. CHALLENGE TO LAND USE DECISIONS: Any person seeking to challenge a decision regarding land use made by the City Council as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and the discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the City Council, shall be required to commence that action 90 days following the date on which the decision of the City Council becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Please refer to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes final. It is the intention of the City of San Jacinto to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact City Hall at (909) 487-7330, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. 9. Volot4 4. eltoteigand, eter4 4 ette eav sag parie4, 4eze,4 aft* aat aucaece ee freadeed tite iateciout9 cuyeed.a eidd 2,5 a cecuy 4na.f . 2004 ad le-pared 4 tau,. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY JUNE 3, 2004 9:55 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order Chairman Jim Ayres called the Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency to order at 9:55 p.m. 1.2 Roll Call Present: Ayres, Carlson-Buydos, Conner, Shaw, Stubblefield Absent: None PUBLIC COMMENTS None PUBLIC HEARING: None CITY DEPARTMENTS Done CONSENT CALENDAR Done CHAIRPERSON / MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS None OPEN SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS CLOSED SESSION Redevelopment Agency Minutes June 3, 2004 Page 2 of 2 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS California Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: Assessors Parcel Numbers (APN) 439-110-093 Agency Negotiator: Peter A. Cosentini, RDA Executive Director Negotiating Parties: Joe Meyer doing business as San Jacinto LLC Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment No reportable action 8. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Ayres adjourned the San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency meeting at 10:12 p.m. San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency by Jim Ayres, Chairman ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, Agency Secretary