Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 5/5/2005
REDEVELOPMENT OPERATIONS MANAGER STEVEN PASAROW AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO;CITY COUNCIL AY 5, 2005, 7:00 p: San :Jacinto °Unified School `District `Board ;Room . 2045 South San Jacinto. Avenue, San Jacinto, California RGANIZATION 1 Call to Order 2 Roll Call 3 invocation 4 Pledge of Allegiance 5 Special Presentations 1,5:1 Presentation of United States Flag /Specialist Jason Hayes PUBLIC COMMENT Now is the time for the public to address the Council on any subject within the jurisdiction of the City Council not listed on the agenda A limitation of three (3) minutesshall be set for each person desiring to;addressthe City Council. CONSENT CALENDAR The matters. listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by City Council Members the form listed. There will -be no separate discuss;on on these items prior to the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed andior discussed if an item is pulled, it will be heard at the end of number 3: City Departments Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the 'Mayor;'state-their name and address; and the consent calendar item` number. Speakers should. limit comments to three (3) minutes: Warrants at 05/05/05 / Approve / Finance Director City Council Agenda May 5, 2005. Page` 2 of 5 Budget Hearing Date change from May 11, 2005 to May 31, 2005 / Approve /rCity Manager, City Sponsorship of. American Cancer Society known as Relay for Life / Approve / City Manager Purchase Work Order System module from H.T.E. accounting system software / Approve and Authorize Finance Director to execute purchase contract / Finance Director Planning:Technician job description and:salaryrange /Approve Community' Development. Director Final Parcel :Map 31717 ,,,,NelSoit Development LLCI Approve and Authorize`the Mayor to execute the Final Map /City Engineer Final Parcel Map'31296 : Meritage Homes / Approve and Authorize the Mayor to execute the Final Map / City Engineer PUBLIC HEARING 4:1 Cancellation of Land Conservation Contract -'San Jacinto .No. 2 /. Applicant: All -Star Equities, 12250 Camino Real, San` Diego,' CA 92130: 1) Approve and Adopt,- A De Minimis impact finding for Tentative Cancellation of Land Conservation Contract San Jacinto No.2 2) Approve and Adopt - A Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Cancellation of Land Conservation Contract San Jacinto No. 2 3) Resolution No / [Approve and Adopt / A Resolution approves that the Tentative` Cancellation; is consistent with the Williamson Act and Approves of the Tentative Cancellation of;San Jacinto No. 2 Land Conservation Contract / Community Development Director 4.2 Tentative Tract. Map 32376 / Applicant Silverstone Development Company Inc / General Pipe' Amendment (GPA) 7-04 request to add %1,6.56 acres to: the General.Plan and designate it as Low Density Residential PUD No. 2- 04, a Planned Unite Development for a 337 unit single family detached residential development, Zone%Change and Pre -zone Change No. 3-04., a Zone Change and Pre -zone Change from County RA-5, City R-1, .W-2 and C-2 to R-1 PUD (Onefamily residential with a PUD act -Map •No: 32376 on 906.8 acres located north of the. Ramona Expressway on both sides of the extension of San Jacinto Avenue: 1) Mitigated Negative Declaration and its associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for this project / Approve City Council Agenda May 5, 2005 Page 3of5 2) Resolution No. / Approve and Adopt / A Resolution approving General Plan. Amendment No: 7-04, an amendment of the General Plan to add 16.56 acres to the City's General Plan as described and to designate said property as Low Density Residential 3) Ordinance No. 05-13 / Approve introduction and firstreading of Ordinance No. 05-13 / An Ordinance approving PUD No, 4-04 , a 337 lot single family detach ed PUD to be known as Western Village, and by further motion read by title only.. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Planned Unit Development (PUD) No.4-04, a 337 Lot Single Family Detached PUD to be Known as Western Village, Located on 96.8 Acres on the North Side of the Ramona Expressway on Both Sides of the Extension of San Jacinto Avenue. 3) Ordinance. No. 05-14 / Approve introduction and first reading of Ordinance No::.05-14 / An Ordinance approving Zone Change No 3-04 and by further motion read by title only: An. Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California Approving Change of. Zone 3-04, A Prezone Change from County RA-5 to City R-1 PUD, and From City R-1 W-2and C-2 to R-1 PUD, on Property located Generally North of the Ramona Expressway on Both sidesof the Extension of San Jacinto Avenue 4) Resolution No. - / Approve and Adopt Resolution No, / A Resolution approving Variance No. 1-05 - a requestto vary from the PUD requirement for RV parking for. the Western Viliage PUD to be located on the north side of the Ramona ,Expresswayon both sides of the extension.. of San Jacinto Avenue 5) Resolution No, / Approve and Adopt Resolution No. / A Resolution approving Tentative Tract Map No. 32376, a 337 lot residential subdivision on the north side of the. Ramona Expressway on both sides of the extension of San Jacinto Avenue ommunity Development Director: Ordinance No.;05-15./ Approve introduction and first:reeding of an Ordinance. approving Zoning Ordinance AmendMerit 01-05,'thereby reducing the parking i-etruirerrithit for drive -through restaurants. and by further, -motion read by only.: An Ordinance of the::City Council of the of San Jacinto, California, : Approving a Zone .Text Amendment to.Modify the Text:of Article 15.03' (10), pertaining fo Off-Street.Parking for Drive,-ln Restaurants, of the San 'Jacinto Zoning: Ordinance, Ordinance 340 City Council Agenda May 5; 2005 Page.4 of 5 DEPARTMENTS' Policy for naming public facilities/ Direct staff inregards to establishing a City resolution that sets the criteria for naming new City facilities / Approve /Assistant to the City Manager Sponsorship of the Hemet Ryan Air Show / Approve and Authorize. the City Manager to execute the agreement with the Riverside County Economic Development; Agency to be a $2,500 sponsorship of the Hemet Ryan Air Snow Resolution No., l A.Resolution approving the Financing of Redevelopment Activities in the. San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area by the Redevelopment Agency of San Jacinto of the City of San Jacinto and: othermatters relating thereto / Approve and: Adopt / Bond Counsel Development Agreements affecting. proposed Development Impact Fees (DIF) / Direct staff / City Manager Space Needs / Approve one year lease not to, exceed $1 15 /sq ft for old Main Street Realty building / Space Needs Committee AYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS 1 Request by Council Member Ritchie to discuss a part-time senior Iiaiso position Reports CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives:-' Roger Crawford & Peter Cosentirii Employee Organization Management Association CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford & Peter Cosentini Employee Organization: Service Employees International Union ADJOURNMENT City C- ouncil Agenda May 5; 20.05a Paae 5 Of.5 -If you challenge any action of the City Council in court, you may be limited. to raising only those issues you or Someone else raised' et the -public hearing describedin this .notice, . or in written correspondence delivered; to. the City Council (clo the Clty Clerk) at, or prior to„ the public; hearing. CHALLENGE TO LAND USE DECISIONS: Any person seeking:to challenge a'decision regarding land use made by the .City Council as a result Of a proceeding in which bylaw a hearing is required to be given,' evidence is requ,red to betaken, and the discretion in the determination of facts is vested in:the' City Council, shall be required to commence that action 90 days following the date on which the decision of the City:.Council becornes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section:1094.. Please refer to: Code of Civil Procedure Section l094 6 to:determine how to calculate when a decision becomes final: It is the intention of the City of; San. Jacinto' to •comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or:a participant at this meeting, or in Meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact City Hall at (951) 487-7330, • at least 48 hours prior to the Meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible tDorotfiy L. Chouinard, City Cferkof the City of San,7acinto, do he6f certify that I'causetfto 6e posted the oregoing agenda this 29th day of,)tp2005 as'required"6y l iw AGENDA ITEM 6/ May 5, 2005 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Bond Counsel - Best Best & Krieger LLP, SUBJECT: Approve and Adopt Resolution relating to the Issuance of the Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, Series 2005 RECOMMENDATION: 1, By motion, approve and adopt the following Resolutions: a. Resolution No. / A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Approving the Financing of Redevelopment Activities in the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto and other matters relating thereto BACKGROUND: it has been proposed that the San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") issue its Tax Allocation Bonds (the "Bonds") for the purpose of (i) refunding the $4,130,000 San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency, Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 1993 (the "1993 Bonds"), which were previously issued, and (ii) improving the San Jacinto Redevelopment Area Project (the "Project"). The 1993 Bonds were secured by the pledge of certain tax revenues collected by the Agency pursuant to an Indenture of Trust. Westhoff, Cone & Holmstedt (the "Underwriter") has proposed that the 1993 Bonds now be refunded for the purpose of creating a cash flow savings to the City and the Authority. The Bonds are to be issued on a tax-exempt basis, and, accordingly, the proceeds of the Bonds must be used for public purposes or be granted to private persons within the Project. In connection with the issuance of the Bonds, the City of San Jacinto (the "City") together with the Agency must approve the issuance of the Bonds. Additionally, current Redevelopment Law requires that the Agency's bonds be sold at competitive bid, unless the Agency sells the Bonds to a public financing authority formed for the purpose of assisting R VPUBIMUM1692908,1 the City and the Agency finance public improvements. As such, the San Jacinto Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") must also approve the purchase and sale of the Bonds, All of the resolutions and approving actions to be taken are included in this package and the actions to be taken by each entity is explained below. City Council Actions: The resolution of the City Council approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Agency. This action is necessary in order to comply with the, requirement under Redevelopment Law that the legislative body of the Agency approve the issuance of the Bonds. Agency Actions: The resolution of the Agency approves the issuance of the Bonds for the purpose of (i) refunding the 1993 Bonds and (ii) financing redevelopment activities in the Project. The resolution also approves the sale of the bonds to the Authority which will concurrently sell the bonds to the Underwriter. Finally, the resolution approves the final term of the bonds and approves a Continuing Disclosure Agreement to be entered into between the Trustee for the Bonds and the Agency. The resolution approves the form of the following documents: 1. Trust Indenture — this document is between the Authority and the Trustee and provides for the issuance of the Bonds and the terms for their repayment. 2. Escrow Deposit and Trust Agreement - this Agreement provides for the deposit of cash with the Escrow Bank in an amount sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the 1993 Bonds on June 1, 2005, the redemption date. 3. Bond Purchase Agreement — this Agreement provides for the purchase and sale of the Bonds. The Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions under which the Bonds may be sold. 4 Official Statement — this document provides prospective purchasers of the Bonds with material information regarding the Bonds, the City, the Agency, the Authority and the Project. Authority Actions: The resolution presented to the Authority approves the purchase and resale of the Bonds of the Agency. The resolution approves the form of the Bond Purchase Agreement and Official Statement. In order to proceed with this financing, the City, the Agency and he Authority should approve each of their respective resolutions. Someone from our office will be present at your meeting should you have any questions or need additional information. Page 2 of 3 RVPUB\MUM1692908.1 JUSTIFICATION: The adoptions of the resolutions are required to annex the territory into the District. BUDGETARY IMPACT: No cost is attributed to this action. ATTACHMENTS: ■ Resolution No. µ ^ RVPUB\MUM\6929D8.1 Page 3 of 3 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005 Refinancing & New Money Analysis April 28, 2005 Westhoff, Cone & Holmstedt REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005 Table of Contents Section Page I. Financing Summary 1 II. "AAA" (Insured) Refunding Only Summary of Refunding Results 2 Sources and Uses of Funds 3 Debt Service Schedule 4 III. "BBB" (Uninsured) Refunding Only Summary of Refunding Results 5 Sources and Uses of Funds 6 Debt Service Schedule 7 1V. 'AAA" (Insured) Refinancing with New Money Sources & Uses of Funds 8 Costs of Issuance 9 Estimated Debt Service Schedule 10 V. "BBB" (Uninsured) Refinancing with New Money Sources & Uses of Funds 11 Costs of Issuance 12 Estimated Debt Service Schedule 13 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005 FINANCING SUMMARY Rating Savings from Refinancing the 1993 Bonds Net present value of savings Average annual savings ""AAA"" (Insured) 4/28/2005 "BBB" (Uninsured) $297,310 $176,237 $21,016 $11,151 Refinancing with New Money for LowiMod Housing Proposed Bond Size $9,550,000 $8,850,000 New Money for Projects $5,081,751 $4,745,179 Maximum Annual Debt Service (Structured for Level Debt Service) $583,000 $583,000 Average Bond Rate 4.47% 5.12% Effective Borrowing Cost 5.09% 5.43% Underwriter's Discount 1.20% 1.225% Costs of Issuance (including bond insurance, if applicable, plus Underwriter's Discount) $625,272 $263,758 Bond Assumptions (applying to both "AAA" or "BBB" scenarios) Sale Date 5/17/2005 Closing Date 5/27/2005 First Interest Payment Date (Interest Only) 8/1/2005 First Principal Payment Date 8/1/2006 Final Maturity 8/1/2034 1 SUMMARY OF REFUNDING RESULTS Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005 'AAA' (Insured) Dated Date 05/27/2005 Delivery Date 05/27/2005 Arbitrage yield 4.399744% Escrow yield Bond Par Amount 3,810,000.00 True Interest Cost 4.193352% Net Interest Cost 4.177570% Average Coupon 3.992433% Average Life 10.569 Par amount of refunded bonds 3,350,000.00 Average coupon of refunded bonds 6.249679% Average life of refunded bonds 11.295 PV of prior debt to 05/27/2005 @ 4,399744% 3,975,318.41 Net PV Savings 297,309.66 Percentage savings of refunded bonds 8.874915% Percentage savings of refunding bonds 7.803403% Apr 28, 2005 3:58 pm Prepared by Westhoff, Cone & Holmstedt (Finance 4.422 san_jacinto:RDA-AAA_REF2,AAA_REF2) Page 2 SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005 'AAA' (Insured) Sources: Bond Proceeds: Par Amount Original Issue Discount Other Sources of Funds: Prior Reserve Account 3,810,000.00 (28,830.05) 3,781,169.95 313.489.00 4,094,658.95 Uses: Refunding Escrow Deposits: Cash Deposit Other Fund Deposits: Reserve Account Delivery Date Expenses: Cost of Issuance Underwriter's Discount Bond Insurance 3,488,068.75 306,881.26 144,220.00 45,720.00 108,352.92 298,292.92 Other Uses of Funds: Additional Proceeds 1,416.02 4,094,658.95 Notes: Assumes Reserve Account equal to MADS. Underwriter's Dsicount equals 1.2% of the Bond amount. Apr 28, 2005 3:58 pm Prepared by Westhoff, Cone & Holmstedt (Finance 4.422 san_jacinto:RDA-.AAA_REF2,AAA_REF2) Page 3 BOND DEBT SERVICE Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005 'AAA' (Insured) Period Ending Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service 12/01/2005 24,973.56 24,973.56 12/01/2006 160,000 2.600% 140,476.26 300,476.26 12/01/2007 170,000 2.750% 136,316.26 306,316.26 12/01/2008 170,000 2.800% 131,641.26 301,641.26 12/01/2009 180,000 2.850% 126,881.26 306,881.26 12/01/2010 175,000 3.000% 121,75126 296,751.26 12/01/2011 180,000 3.100% 116,501.26 296,501.26 12/01/2012 190,000 3.200% 110,921.26 300,921.26 12/01/2013 195,000 3.300% 104,841.26 299,841.26 12/01/2014 200,000 3.500% 98,406.26 298,406.26 12/01/2015 205,000 3.625% 91,406.26 296,406.26 12/01/2016 220,000 3.800% 83,975.00 303,975.00 12/01/2017 225,000 3.900% 75,615.00 300,615.00 12/01/2018 230,000 4.000% 66,840.00 296,840.00 l2/01/2019 245,000 4.400% 57,640.00 302,640.00 12/01/2020 250,000 4.400% 46,860.00 296,860.00 12/01/2021 265,000 4.400% 35,860.00 300,860.00 12/01/2022 265,000 4.400% 24,200.00 289,200.00 12/01/2023 285,000 4.400% 12,540.00 297,540.00 3,810,000 1,607,646.16 5,417,646.16 Apr 28, 2005 3:58 pm Prepared by Westhoff, Cone & Holmstedt (Finance 4.422 san_jacinto:RDA-AAA_REF2,AAA_REF2) Page 4 SUMMARY OF REFUNDING RESULTS Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005 'BBB' (Uninsured) Dated Date 05/27/2005 Delivery Date 05/27/2005 Arbitrage yield 4.794137% Escrow yield Bond Par Amount 3,715,000.00 True Interest Cost 4.949398% Net Interest Cost 4.924576% Average Coupon 4.730463% Averacie Life 10.755 Par amount of refunded bonds 3,350,000.00 Average coupon of refunded bonds 6.249679% Average life of refunded bonds 11.295 PV of prior debt to 05/27/2005 @ 4.794137% 3,854,034.65 Net PV Savings 176,237.15 Percentage savings of refunded bonds 5.260810% Percentage savings of refunding bonds 4.743934% Apr 28, 2005 3:59 pm Prepared by Westhoff, Cone & Holmstedt (Finance 4.422 san jacinto:RDA-BBB_REF3,BBB_REF3) Page 5 SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005 'BBB' (Uninsured) Sources: Bond Proceeds: Par Amount Original Issue Discount Other Sources of Funds: Prior Reserve Account 3,715,000.00 (32,050.00) 3,682,950.00 313,489.00 3,996,439.00 Uses: Refunding Escrow Deposits: Cash Deposit Other Fund Deposits: Reserve Account Delivery Date Expenses: Cost of Issuance Underwriter's Discount Other Uses of Funds: Additional Proceeds 3,488,068.75 314,693.76 44,220.00 45,508.75 189,728.75 3,947.74 3,996,439.00 Notes: Assumes Reserve Account equal to MADS. Underwriter's Dsicount equals 1.225% of the Bond amount. Apr 28, 2005 3:59 pm Prepared by Westhoff, Cone & Holmstedt (Finance 4.422 san_jacinto:RDA-BBB_REF3,BBB_REF3) Page 6 BOND DEBT SERVICE Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005 'BBB' (Uninsured) Period Ending Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service 12/01/2005 29,156.22 29,156.22 1 2/01 /2006 145,000 3.000% 164,003.76 309,003.76 12/01/2007 155,000 3.200% 159,653.76 314,653.76 12/01/2008 160,000 3.400% 154,693.76 314,693.76 12/01/2009 165,000 3.600% 149,253.76 314,253.76 12/01/2010 165,000 3.750% 143,313.76 308,313.76 12/01/2011 170,000 3.875 % 137,126.26 307,126.26 12/01/2012 180,000 4.000% 130,538.76 310,538.76 12/01/2013 190,000 4.100% 123,338.76 313,338.76 12/01/2014 195,000 4.250% 115,548.76 310,548.76 12/01/2015 200,000 4.375% 107,261.26 307,261.26 12/01/2016 215,000 4.5009 98,511.26 313,511.26 12/01/2017 220,000 4.600% 88,836-26 308,836.26 12/01/2018 230,000 4.700% 78,716.26 308,716.26 12/01/201.9 240,000 5.125% 67,906 26 307,906.26 12/01/2020 250,000 5.125% 55,606.26 305,606.26 12/01/2021 270,000 5.125% 42,793.76 312,793.76 12/01/2022 275,000 5.125% 28,956.26 303,956.26 12/01/2023 290,000 5.125 % 14,862.50 304,862.50 3,715,000 1,890,077.64 5,605,077.64 Apr 28, 2005 3:59 pm Prepared by Westhoff, Cone & Holmstedl (Finance 4.422 san_jacinto:RDA-BBB_REF3,BBB_REF3) Page 7 4/28/2005 ESTIMATED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005 "AAA" (Insured) Sources Par Amount $9,550,000 Original Issue Discount (1) (85,154) Prior Reserve Account (2) 313,489 Total Sources of Funds $9,778,335 Uses New Money for Projects $5,081,751 Cost of Defeasing 1993 Bonds 3,488,069 Bond Insurance Premium (3) 350,077 Reserve Fund (4) 583.244 Cost of Issuance 160,595 Underwriter's Discount (1.20%) 114,600 Total Uses of Funds $9,778,335 (1) Allowance for all or a portion of the Bonds to be sold at a slight discount to par in order to keep the interest rate paid per maturity to a minimum. If the discounted bonds do not prove to be cost effective, they will not be utilized. (2) Source: Union Bank of California, as Trustee. Balance as of 4/6/04. (3) Equals 2% of total Debt Service. (4) Equals Maximum Annual Debt Service excluding the final year of debt service. 8 ESTIMATED COSTS OF ISSUANCE Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005 "AAA" (Insured) Item Bond Counsel -- Best Best & Krieger $50,250 Disclosure Counsel -- Best Best & Krieger 25,125 Financial Advisor -- CM De Crinis & Co. 36,750 Fiscal Consultant -- Rosenow Spevacek Group 25,000 Rating Agency -- S&P 11,000 Trustee/Escrow Agent -- UBOC 4,620 Printing -- Royce Printing 7,500 CUSIP 350 Contingency 0 Total $160,595 4/28/2005 9 ESTIMATED DEBT SERVICE Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005 "AAA" (Insured) Dated/Delivery Date: 5/27/2005 Date Principal Coupon (1) Interest Total 4/28/2005 8/1/2006 180,000 2.60% 402,788 582,788 8/1/2007 185,000 2.75% 398,108 583,108 8/1/2008 190,000 2.80% 393,020 583,020 8/1/2009 195,000 2.85% 387,700 582,700 8/1/2010 200,000 3.00% 382,143 582,143 8/1/2011 205,000 3.10% 376,143 581,143 8/1/2012 210,000 3.20% 369,788 579,788 8/1/2013 220,000 3.30% 363,068 583,068 8/1/2014 225,000 3.50% 355,808 580,808 8/1/2015 235,000 3.63% 347,933 582,933 8/1/2016 240,000 3.80% 339,414 579,414 8/1/2017 250,000 3.90% 330,294 580,294 8/1/2018 260,000 4.00% 320,544 580,544 8/1/2019 270,000 4.50% 310,144 580,144 8/1/2020 285,000 4.50% 297,994 582,994 8/1/2021 295,000 4.50% 285,169 580,169 8/1/2022 310,000 4.50% 271,894 581,894 8/1/2023 325,000 4.50% 257,944 582,944 8/1/2024 335,000 4.50% 243,319 578,319 8/1/2025 355,000 4.63% 228,244 583,244 8/1/2026 370,000 4.63% 211,825 581,825 8/1/2027 385,000 4.63% 194,713 579,713 8/1/2028 405,000 4.63% 176,906 581,906 8/1/2029 425,000 4.63% 158,175 583,175 8/1/2030 440,000 4.63% 138,519 578,519 8/1/2031 460,000 4.63% 118,169 578,169 8/1/2032 485,000 4.63% 96,894 581,894 8/1/2033 505,000 4.63% 74,463 579,463 8/1/2034 1,105,000 (2) 4.63% 51,106 1,156,106 (2) Total $9,550,000 $7,953,828 $17,503,828 (1) Based on interest rates for "AAA" (Insured) bonds as of 4/27/05. (2) Reflects bonds associated with the Debt Service Reserve Fund. Net Debt Service is level. 10 4/28/2005 ESTIMATED SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005 "BBB" (Uninsured) Sources Par Amount $8,850,000 Original Issue Discount (1) (83,406) Prior Reserve Account (2) 313,489 Total Sources of Funds $9,080,083 Uses New Money for Projects $4,745,179 Cost of Defeasing 1993 Bonds 3,488,069 Reserve Fund (3) 583,078 Cost of Issuance 155,346 Underwriter's Discount (1.225%) 108,413 Total Uses of Funds $9,080,083 (1) Allowance for all or a portion of the Bonds to be sold at a slight discount to par in order to keep the interest rate paid per maturity to a minimum. If the discounted bonds do not prove to be cost effective, they will not be utilized. (2) Source: Union Bank of California, as Trustee. Balance as of 4/6/04. (3) Equals Maximum Annual Debt Service excluding the final year of debt service. 11 ESTIMATED COSTS OF ISSUANCE Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005 "BBB" (Uninsured) Item Bond Counsel -- Best Best & Krieger S46,750 Disclosure Counsel -- Best Best & Krieger 23,375 Financial Advisor -- CM De Crinis & Co. 36,750 Fiscal Consultant -- Rosenow Spevacek Group 25,000 Rating Agency -- S&P 11,000 Trustee/Escrow Agent -- UBOC 4,620 Printing -- Royce Printing 7,500 CU STP 350 Contingency 1 Total S155,346 4/28/2005 12 Date ESTIMATED DEBT SERVICE Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005 "BBB" (Uninsured) Dated/Delivery Date: 5/26/2005 Principal Coupon (1) Interest Total 4/28/2005 8/1/2006 150,000 3.00% 433,078 583,078 8/1/2007 150,000 3.20% 428,578 578,578 8/1/2008 155,000 3.40% 423,778 578,778 8/1/2009 160,000 3.60% 418,508 578,508 8/1/2010 170,000 3.75% 412,748 582,748 8/1/2011 175,000 3.88% 406,373 581,373 8/1/2012 180,000 4.00% 399,591 579,591 8/1/2013 190,000 4.10% 392,391 582,391 8/1/2014 195,000 4.25% 384,601 579,601 8/1/2015 205,000 4.38% 376,314 581,314 8/1/2016 215,000 4.50% 367,345 582,345 8/1/2017 225,000 4.60% 357,670 582,670 8/1/2018 235,000 4.70% 347,320 582,320 8/1/2019 245,000 5.13% 336,275 581,275 8/1/2020 255,000 5.13% 323,719 578,719 8/1/2021 270,000 5.13% 310,650 580,650 S/1/2022 285,000 5.13% 296,813 581,813 8/1/2023 300,000 5.13% 282,206 582,206 8/1/2024 315,000 5.13% 266,831 581,831 8/1/2025 330,000 5.25% 250,688 580,688 8/1/2026 345,000 5.25% 233,363 578,363 8/1/2027 365,000 5.25% 215,250 580,250 8/1/2028 385,000 5.25% 196,088 581,088 8/1/2029 405,000 5.25% 175,875 580,875 8/1/2030 425,000 5.25% 154,613 579,613 8/1/2031 450,000 5.25% 132,300 582,300 8/1/2032 470,000 5.25% 108,675 578,675 8/1/2033 495,000 5.25% 84,000 579,000 8/1/2034 1,105,000 (2) 5.25% 58,013 1,163,013 (2) Total $8,850,000 $8.651,843 $17,501,843 (1) Based on interest rates for 'BBB" -rated bonds as of 4/27/05. (2) Reflects bonds associated with the Debt Service Reserve Fund. Net Debt Service is level. 13 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) ss RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINANCING OF REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES IN THE SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto (the "Agency") is authorized pursuant to Part 1 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code (the "Act") to issue bonds for any of its corporate purposes; and WHEREAS, the Agency, in connection with its San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project"), has indicated its intention to issue bonds to be designated as `Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto, San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005" (the "Bonds") in an aggregate principal amount issue not to exceed $10,000,000 the proceeds of which will be used to finance the Project and to refinance existing bonds of the Agency issued in 1993; and WHEREAS, Section 33640 of the Law requires the Agency to obtain the approval of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto prior to issuance of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, the City Council approves of the issuance of the Bonds as being in the public interests of the City of San Jacinto and of the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto as follows: Section 1. Approval of Financing. This City Council hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto, as described herein, above. Section 2. Effective Date, This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. RVPUB\KAB1689144.1 -1- PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto on this 5th day of May, 2005. Ayes: Nays: Absent: Abstain: ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk City of San Jacinto APPROVED AS TO FORM BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP City Attorney CITY OF SAN JACINTO By: Chris Carlson Buydos, Mayor RVPUB'VCAB1689144.1 - 2 - STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) I, DOROTHY CHOUINARD, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, at a regular meeting held on the day of , 2005. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: CITY OF SAN JACINTO Dorothy Chouinard, City Clerk RVPUB'KAB\689144.1 -3- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINANCING OF REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES IN THE SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto (the "Agency") is authorized pursuant to Part 1 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code (the "Act") to issue bonds for any of its corporate purposes; and WHEREAS, the Agency, in connection with its San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project"), has indicated its intention to issue bonds to be designated as `Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto, San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005" (the "Bonds") in an aggregate principal amount issue not to exceed $10,000,000 the proceeds of which will be used to finance the Project and to refinance existing bonds of the Agency issued in 1993; and WHEREAS, Section 33640 of the Law requires the Agency to obtain the approval of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto prior to issuance of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, the City Council approves of the issuance of the Bonds as being in the public interests of the City of San Jacinto and of the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto as follows: Section 1. Approval of Financing. This City Council hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto, as described herein, above. Section 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. Page 1 of 2 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto on this 5th day of May, 2005. Ayes: Nays: Absent: Abstain: CITY OF SAN JACINTO By: Chris Carlson Buydos, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk City of San Jacinto APPROVED AS TO FORM BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP City Attorney STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) I, Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. was adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, at a regular meeting held on the 5th day of May, 2005. Witness my hand and official seal this day of , 2005 Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk Page 2 of 2 AGENDA ITEM =? i May 5, 2005 TO: President and Directors of the Board of Directors of the Financing Authority FROM: Bond Counsel - Best Best & Krieger LLP, SUBJECT: Approve and Adopt Resolution relating to the Issuance of the Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, Series 2005 RECOMMENDATION: 1. By motion, approve and adopt the following Resolutions: a. Resolution No. / A Resolution of the San Jacinto. Financing Authority Authorizing the Purchase and Sale of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto, Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005, upon certain terms and conditions, approving the Form and Authorizing Execution of a Bond. Purchase Agreement relating thereto and providing other matters properly relating thereto BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that the San. Jacinto Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") issue its Tax Allocation Bonds (the 'Bonds") for the purpose of (i) refunding the $4,130,000 San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency, Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 1993 (the "1993 Bonds"), which were previously issued, and (ii) improving the San Jacinto Redevelopment Area Project (the "Project"). The 1993 Bonds were secured by the pledge of certain tax revenues collected by the Agency pursuant to an Indenture of Trust. Westhoff, Cone & Holmstedt (the "Underwriter") has proposed that the 1993 Bonds now be refunded for the purpose of creating a cash flow savings to the City and the Authority. The Bonds are to be, issued on a tax-exempt, basis, and, accordingly, the proceeds of the Bonds must be used for public purposes or be granted to private persons within the Project. App City Manager: Finance Director: RVPUB\MUM\692908.1 In connection with the issuance of the Bonds, the City of San Jacinto (the "City") together with the Agency must approve the issuance of the Bonds. Additionally, current Redevelopment Law requires that the Agency's bonds be sold at competitive bid, unless the Agency sells the Bonds to a public financing authority formed for the purpose of assisting the City and the Agency finance public improvements. As such, the San Jacinto Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") must also approve the purchase and sale of the Bonds. All of the resolutions and approving actions to be taken are included in this package and the actions to be taken by each entity is explained below. City Council Actions: The resolution of the City Council approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Agency. This action is necessary in order to comply with the requirement under Redevelopment Law that the legislative body of the Agency approve the issuance of the Bonds, Agency Actions: The resolution of the Agency approves the issuance of the Bonds for the purpose of (i) refunding the 1993 Bonds and (ii) financing redevelopment activities in the Project. The resolution also approves the sale of the bonds to the Authority which will concurrently sell the bonds to the Underwriter. Finally, the resolution approves the final term of the bonds and approves a Continuing Disclosure Agreement to be entered into between the Trustee for the Bonds and the Agency. The resolution approves the -form of the following documents: 1. Trust Indenture - this document is between the Authority and the Trustee and provides for the issuance of the Bonds and the terms for their repayment. 2. Escrow Deposit and Trust Agreement — this Agreement provides for the deposit of cash with the Escrow Bank in an amount sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the 1993 Bonds on June 1, 2005, the redemption date. 3. Bond Purchase Agreement — this Agreement provides for the purchase and sale of the Bonds, The Agreement sets forth the terms and conditions under which the Bonds may be sold. 4. Official Statement — this document provides prospective purchasers of the Bonds with material information regarding the Bonds, the City, the Agency, the Authority and the Project. Authority Actions: The resolution presented to the Authority approves the purchase and resale of the Bonds of the Agency. The resolution approves the form of the Bond Purchase Agreement and Official Statement. In order to proceed with this financing, the City, the Agency and the Authority should approve each of their respective resolutions. Page 2 of 3 RVPUBIMUM1692908.1 Someone from our office will be present at your meeting should you have any questions or need additional information. JUSTIFICATION: The adoptions of the resolutions are required to annex the territory into the District. BUDGETARY IMPACT: No cost is attributed to this action. ATTACHMENTS: ■ Resolution No. RVPUB\MUM\692908.1 Page 3 of 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) ss RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE AND SALE OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA TAX ALLOCATION BONDS, SERIES 2005, UPON CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS, APPROVING THE FORM AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT RELATING THERETO AND PROVIDING OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto (the "City") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto ("the Agency") entered into a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (the "Agreement"), creating the San Jacinto Financing Authority (the „Authority"); WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act") and the Agreement, the Authority is authorized to purchase bonds issued by the Agency for financing and refinancing public capital improvements; WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act and the Agreement the Authority is further authorized to sell bonds so purchases to public or private purchasers at public or negotiated sale; WHEREAS, the Authority desires to purchase from the Agency its not to exceed $10,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto, San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005 (the "Bonds"), solely from the proceeds received from the Authority's concurrent sale of the Bonds to Westhoff, Cone & Holmstedt (the "Underwriter") pursuant to a bond purchase agreement (the "Purchase Contract"), by and among the Agency, the Authority and the Underwriter; WHEREAS, the Agency has caused an Official Statement, in preliminary form, relating to the Bonds (the "Official Statement") to be submitted to the Authority for approval for distribution to purchasers of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the "Board"), with the aid of its staff, has reviewed the Purchase Contract and the preliminary Official Statement and wishes to approve and confirm the foregoing, as well as the other matters set forth below, in the public interests of, and for significant public benefits to, the Agency and the City of San Jacinto; Page 1 of 3 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the San Jacinto Financing Authority, as follows: Section 1. The Board hereby authorizes the purchase of the Bonds by the Authority from the Agency for concurrent resale by the Authority to the Underwriter pursuant to and in accordance with the Purchase Contract in substantially the forms on file with the Secretary together with any additions thereto or changes therein approved by the Authority's Executive Director or Treasurer, and the execution thereof shall be conclusive evidence of such approval. The Authority hereby delegates to the Authority's Executive Director or Treasurer (or his written designee) the authority to accept an offer from the Underwriter to purchase the Bonds from the Authority; provided, however, that the stated average annual interest rate payable with respect to the Bonds shall not exceed six percent (6.000%) per annum, and the purchase price paid by the Underwriter for the purchase of the bonds shall be not less than Ninety Eight and Seven Hundred Twenty Fifths percent (98.725%) of the par amount thereof, excluding any original issue discount on the applicable series of the Bonds. In addition to the foregoing, the Agency hereby approves such changes to the Purchase Contract as the Executive Director shall deem necessary, desirable or appropriate to provide for the direct purchase of all or a portion of the Bonds by Fannie Mae or other institutional purchaser that is precluded by its charter or otherwise from purchasing Bonds through the Underwriter. Section 2. The Chairperson, the Executive Director, the Treasurer, the Secretary and the General Counsel of the Authority and any and all other officers of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Authority, to do any and all things and take any and all actions, including execution and delivery of any and all assignments, certificates, requisition, agreements notices, consents, and other documents, which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the sale, issuance and delivery of the Bonds to the Underwriter pursuant to the Purchase Contract. Any officer of the Authority herein authorized or directed to take any action may designate another officer of the Authority to take such action on his or her behalf, such designation to be approved or ratified in writing with respect to the taking of the applicable action. Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the San Jacinto Financing Authority by the following vote on this 5th day of May, 2005. Ayes: Nays: Page 2of3 Absent: Abstain: ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, Secretary San Jacinto Public Financing Authority APPROVED AS TO FORM BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP City Attorney SAN JACINTO PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY By: Chris Carlson Buydos, Chairperson CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) I, Dorothy L. Chouinard, Secretary of the San Jacinto Financing Authority, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. _ was adopted at the meeting of the San Jacinto Financing Authority, held on the 5th day of May, 2005. Witness my hand and official seal this day of , 2005. SAN JACINTO PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Dorothy L. Chouinard, Secretary Page 3 of 3 AGENDA EGULAR MEETING of the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO MAY 5, 2005 Immediately Following the Regular City Council Meeting San Jacinto Unified School District. Board Room 2045 South San. Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California : ORGANIZATION I. Call to Order 1:2 Roll Call PUBLIC COMMENTS None PUBLIC HEARING: Now is the time for the public to address the Agency on any subject not !lsted on the agenda. Any person may address the Agencyon any subjectpertaining to Redevelopment Agency business not listed on the. Agenda during this portion of the Meeting.' A limitation of three"(3); minutes shall, be set for each person ':desiring to address the Agency"Directors."" CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted byone motion by Agency Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the Redevelopment Agency, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. Any agenda item pulled will be heard at the end of 5: City. Departments. Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Agency Chairman, .state their name; address and the consent calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes, None CITY DEPARTMENTS 5.1 Resolution No. / A Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the. City of San Jacinto Approving the Issuance of its San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005, approving the Form of and Authorizing Execution of a Trust Indenture, RedevelopmentAgency Agenda May 5200 ,5 " Paae.2.of 2- Escrow Agreement,`. Bond "Purchase Agreement, and an Official Statement,. setting the..maximum final terms'of the'sale of the bonds " and making certain; determinations'relating,thereto" CHAIRPERSON / MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS Opp,' OPEN SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: Park Manor Property (southeast comer of First Street and Estudillo Avenue and southwest comer of First. Street and Pico Avenue (APNs 437-023-001, 437-023-002 and 437-023-005) Agency Negotiator Peter Cosentini, Executive Director Negotiating Parties`: San Jacinto Assembly of God Church Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment ADJOURNMENT 1. is the intention ofthe City of San Jacinto.to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act: (ADA) in all respects. 3f, as an" attendee. or apart,cipant at this meeting,, or, in: meetings'" on a"rep lar basis; you'will.need special assistance beyond, what is normallyprovided, the City,, will attenipl to accommodate you ihi every, reasonable manner. Please' ,--Contact City Hall at (909) 487-7330, at least4&hours prior to the meeting to :inform us ofyourparticularneeds and to ' determine if accommodation is feasible. If you challenge any action of the.City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you orsomeone else raised at the public.hearing desc'rtbed in this notice; or in written correspondence delivered to the. City Council (c/o the City Clerk) at, 'or prior to, the'public hearing.. " cDorotlty L. Crwuinard ,Secretary of the San Jacinto tl development J4gency, da.ltereby certify tfirit I mused 0,4 posted t{te f oregoing ageni4 the 29th day ofApri� 2©0 5, as required dy faw: harpers edeveloi CKGROU Best Best adopt the fa llowliig Resolution has been _proposed that. the San =,, �x Allocation, Bands (the '.'Bends" �cinto, Redevelopment Agency, T htch= were previously issued,' anc otect (the "Protect"} cinto Redevelopment -Agency; (i for the purpose:. of (1) refundin! Allocation Bonds, Series 199 (11) improving the San Jacinto; The -1:993 Bonds were secured by _;the Agency` pursuant to an',lndenture of Trus nas proposed` that the ,1993 Bonds `now:k savings to the: City and the A athonty .; The Bonds are to be issued on a tax=exempt.,basis, enc Bonds m•ust be used for public: purposes or be„granted-to revenues olmstedt ( pose of creatin ccordingly the proceeds ivate persons within the" Pro' connection:wth the lssuerice:of theBonds h the Agency must approve :the issuance;of he -City of ;San Jacinto {the'"( ie Bonds Additionally, current edevelopment Law requtres;;that the Agency's bonds. gency sells the Bonds to. a public;financing°authoritj ie City' and .tFe Agency ,finance , public improvement Ina ncing Authority (the "Authority") must Ow; approve 11 of tl a resolutionsproving actions to'be taken are' ctions.'to be taken by each entity isexplained below. 4grency,Actions fhe resolution of efunding the jgc esolution also;ap he bonds. to: the and approves a°C or :the` Bonds an locuments e sold et competitive bid, unless th; formed for' the purpose of assistin �s;:such,'the San Jacinto Publi purchase and sale of #he, Bond; included in this package and th e.Gity Council approves the "issuance off the Bonds` by the in order to, comply; with the: requirement under"Redevelop of'fhe Agency approve: the' issuance of the Bonds.:' the Agency approves the issuance;of the `Bonds'for; 3 Bonds and (ii) financing redevelopment activities' in° groves the sale of th'e bonds to the.;Authority which wi Jnderwriter ``Finally, the resolution "approves the final ontinuing Disclosure Agreement to.,be entered i:be e resolution .antoproves the ;forth 1°rust Indenture -:ibis ;document is between the.Authority and .the Trustee en' provides for' the issuance of the Bonds and'the terms for their repayment - scrow Deposit and Trust Agreement this Agreement provides for the depgs cash with=the Escrow Bank in an' ern -punt sufficient tO pay the::principal of.an nterest on;.the 11993'Bonds on June 1, 2005, the redemption date eement provides orth;ttie,,.terms and conditions un vial Statement "'this documentprovi 'material information regarding I the Project thelD17.1t.Cnase of<the Bond the uthorif e resolution presented to the,Authority ap`proves,;thepurchase andnresale of theB Agency. Tle resolutionapproves the for'mof the Bond Purchase Agreement an ficiatStaterne'nt order to proceed with this financing, the.: City, the Agency and the Authorit} prove:°each:ofitheir respective resolutions..: NiPu81MUM\692908 Someone from our office will be present at your meeting should you have any questions or need additional information. JUSTIFICATION: The adoptions of the resolutions are required to issue the bonds. BUDGETARY IMPACT: No cost is attributed to this action. ATTACHMENTS: ■ Resolution No. RVPUBIMUM1692908.1 Page 3 of 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF ITS SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA TAX ALLOCATION BONDS, SERIES 2005, APPROVING THE FORM OF AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A TRUST INDENTURE, ESCROW AGREEMENT, BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT, AND AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT, SETTING THE MAXIMUM FINAL TERMS OF THE SALE OF THE BONDS AND MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS RELATING THERETO WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto (the "Agency") is a redevelopment agency duly created, established and authorized to transact business and exercise its powers, all under and pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law, being Part I of Division 24 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, and the powers of the Agency include the power to issue bonds for any of its corporate purposes; and WHEREAS, a redevelopment plan for a redevelopment project known as the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area (the "Redevelopment Project") has been adopted, amended and approved and all requirements of law for, and precedent to, the adoption and approval of said plan have been duly complied with; and WHEREAS, the Agency has previously issued its $4,130,000 original principal amount of Tax Allocation Bonds, Issue of 1993 (the "1993 Bonds") for the purpose of financing redevelopment activities in the Redevelopment Project; and WHEREAS, the Agency proposes to issue not to exceed $10,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005 (the "Bonds") the proceeds of which will be used to finance redevelopment activities within the Redevelopment Project and to refinance the 1993 Bonds, the Bonds will be secured from tax increment revenues of the Redevelopment Project; and WHEREAS, there has been presented at this meeting a form of trust indenture providing for the issuance of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, the Agency proposes to sell the Bonds to the San Jacinto Financing Authority (the "Authority") which will concurrently sell the Bonds to Westhoff, Cone & Holmstedt, as purchaser of the Bonds (the "Underwriter"), all on the terms and conditions herein set forth and as provided in the form of bond purchase agreement (the "Purchase Contract") on file with the Secretary; WHEREAS, the Agency, with the assistance of C.M. De Crinis & Co. (the "Financing Consultant"), and Best Best & Krieger LLP, Disclosure Counsel, has caused Page 1 of 5 to be prepared an official statement describing the Bonds, the preliminary form of which is on file with the Secretary (the "Official Statement"); and WHEREAS, the Agency, with the aid of its staff has reviewed such trust indenture, the Escrow Agreement, the Purchase Contracts and the Official Statement and the Agency wishes at this time to approve the foregoing in the public interests of the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto as follows: Section 1. Approval of Issuance of Bonds. The Agency hereby authorizes the issuance of the Bonds, in order to provide a portion of the moneys required to finance redevelopment activities in the Redevelopment Project and to refund the 1993 Bonds. The Bonds shall be issued in an aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $10,000,000. Section 2. Trust Indenture. The form of Trust Indenture, for the issuance of the Bonds, by and between the Agency and Union Bank of Califomia, N.A., as trustee (the "Indenture"), presented at this meeting are hereby approved and the Chairperson, the Executive Director/Secretary or the Treasurer is and each of them are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name of and on behalf of the Agency, to execute, acknowledge and deliver the Indenture in substantially the forms presented at this meeting with such changes therein as the officers executing the same may approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof. Section 3. Appointment of Trustee. Union Bank of California, N.A. is hereby appointed at Trustee pursuant to the Indenture, to take any and all action provided for therein to be taken by the Trustee. Section 4. Official Statement. The form of Preliminary Official Statement relating to the Bonds and presented to this meeting is hereby approved. The preparation of a final official statement relating to the Bonds (the "Final Official Statement") is hereby approved and the Chairperson, the Executive Director/Secretary or the Treasurer is and each of them are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to execute and deliver a Final Official Statement containing such changes from the Preliminary Official Statement as may be approved by the Chairperson, the Executive Director/Secretary, the Treasurer, Bond Counsel and/or the Agency Counsel, and the distribution of the Official Statement and the Final Official Statement in connection with the sale of the Bonds is hereby authorized. The Chairperson, the Executive Director/Secretary or the Treasurer is and each of them are also authorized and directed to deem the Preliminary Official Statement final within the meaning of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Rule"), omitting only such information as is permitted under such Rule, and to execute an appropriate certificate stating the Agency's determination that the Preliminary Official Statement has been deemed final within the meaning of such Rule. The Executive Director/Secretary Page 2 of 5 or the Treasurer is authorized to execute such continuing disclosure obligation as may be necessary to comply with Rule 15c2-12. Section 5. Form of Bonds. The form of the Bonds as set forth in the Indenture as presented to this meeting is hereby approved and the Chairperson or the Vice Chairperson and the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to execute by manual or facsimile signature, in the name and on behalf of the Agency and under its seal, such Bonds in either temporary and/or definitive form in the aggregate principal amount set forth in the Indenture and all in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Indentures. Section 6. Sale of the Bonds. The Agency hereby authorizes the sale of the Bonds to the Authority for concurrent resale by the Authority to the Underwriter pursuant to and in accordance with the Purchase Contract in substantially the form on file with the Secretary together with any additions thereto or changes therein approved by the Executive Director, including any modifications necessary to implement the private placement of all or a portion of the Bonds and the payment of allocable placement agency fees, and the execution thereof shall be conclusive evidence of such approval. The Agency hereby delegates to the Executive Director (or his written designee) the authority to accept an offer from the Underwriter to purchase the Bonds from the Authority and to execute the Purchase Contract for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency; provided, however, that the stated average annual interest rate payable with respect to the Bonds shall not exceed six percent (6.000%) per annum, and the purchase price paid by the Underwriter for the purchase of each series of the Bonds shall be not less than Ninety Eight and Seven Hundred Twenty Fifths percent (98.725%) of the par amount thereof, excluding any original issue discount on the Bonds. In addition to the foregoing, the Agency hereby approves such changes to the Purchase Contract as the Executive Director shall deem necessary, desirable or appropriate to provide for the direct purchase of all or a portion of the Bonds by Fannie Mae or other institutional purchaser that is precluded by its charter or otherwise from purchasing Bonds through the Underwriter. Section 7. Section 7. Credit Rating and Bond Insurance Expenses. The Agency staff and its consultants for the Bonds are hereby authorized and directed to make application to one or more credit rating agencies for assignment of a credit rating to the Bonds or to one or more insurance companies for bond insurance with respect to the Bonds, or both (as the Financing Consultant shall recommend), and the Agency shall pay expenses incident to any such applications or shall reimburse the Financing Consultant for any advance of such expenses, such reimbursement to be made to the Financing Consultant not more than thirty (30) days following the date of any such advance (all expenses ultimately to be reimbursed to the Agency from the proceeds of the Bonds). Section 8. Escrow Agreement. The refunding of the 1993 Bonds is hereby approved together with the form of Escrow Deposit and Trust Agreement, presented to this meeting, by and between the Agency and Union Bank of California, N.A., as escrow bank, and the Chairperson, the Executive Director/Secretary, or the Page 3 of 5 Finance Director is and each of them are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name of and on behalf of the Agency, to execute, acknowledge and deliver the Escrow Deposit and Trust Agreement in substantially the form presented at this meeting with such changes therein as the officers executing the same may approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof. Section 9. Official Action. The Chairperson, the Vice -Chairperson, the Executive Director, Assistant Executive Director, the Agency Treasurer, the Secretary, the Assistant Secretary, the Agency General Counsel and any and all other officers of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name and on behalf of the Agency, to do any and all things and take any and all actions, including execution and delivery of any and all assignments, certificates, requisitions, including, without limitation, requisitions for the payment of costs of issuance of the Bonds, agreements, including, without limitation, agreements providing for investment of proceeds of the Bonds, notices, consents, instruments of conveyance, warrants and other documents, which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds. Any officer of the Agency herein authorized or directed to take any action may designate another officer of the Agency to take such action on his or her behalf, such designation to be approved or ratified in writing with respect to the taking of the applicable action. Section 10. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto on this 5th day of May, 2005, by the following vote: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Abstain: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO By: Chris Carlson Buydos, Chairperson ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, Secretary Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto Page 4 of 5 APPROVED AS TO FORM BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP City Attorney CERTIFICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) I, Dorothy L. Chouinard, Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at the regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto, held on this day of , 2005. Witness my hand and official seal this day of , 2005. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO Dorothy L. Chouinard, Secretary Page 5 of 5 Issues: Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on ❑ ❑ ❑ X the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X X d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1- ❑ ; ❑ X B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? ❑ ❑ ❑ X X Issues: Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact c) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ ❑ ❑ X environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? d) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? e) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ❑ ❑ ❑ X hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? f) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? ❑ ❑ X X h) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with ❑ ❑ ❑ X an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? VDT. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ❑ X requirements? X X Issues: Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ❑ ❑ ❑ X substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? ❑ d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ❑ X ❑ site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ❑ X ❑ the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ ❑ ❑ X g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ❑ X El ❑ mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ❑ X that would impede or redirect flood flows? j) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ❑ X injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? k) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ X X Issues: Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ❑ ❑ ❑ X regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan ❑ ❑ ❑ X or natural community conservation plan? X.MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? XI. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? ❑ ❑ X ❑ ❑ X X X d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient ❑ El X noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ❑ ❑ ❑ X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Issues: Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ❑ ❑ ❑ X would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of road or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project: a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: ❑ ❑ X Fire protection? ❑ ❑ X Police protection? ❑ ❑ X X X Schools? ❑ ❑ X Parks? ❑ ❑ X ❑ Other public facilities? ❑ 0 X 0 Issues: XIV. RECREATION. Would the project: Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional ❑ ❑ X parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XV. TRANSPORTATION / TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation ❑ X to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? ❑ ❑ X ❑ X ❑ X d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ❑ ❑ ❑ X (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ X f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ ❑ X g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ❑ ❑ ❑ X supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Issues: XVI UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact E X X d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ❑ ❑ X project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? In making this determination, the City shall consider whether the project is subject to the water supply assessment requirements of Water Code Section 10910, et. seq. (SB 610), and the requirements of Government Code Section 664737 (SB 221). e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? X ❑ f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ❑ ❑ X capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X ❑ Issues: XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat or a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact X X X APPENDIX B TABLE 1 AND TABLE 2 OF SCAQMD RULE 403 TABLE 1 BEST [REASONABLY]* AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES FOR HIGH WIND CONDITIONS FUGITIVE DUST SOURCE CATEGORY CONTROL MEASURES Earth -moving (1A) Cease all active operations; OR (2A) Apply water to soil not more than 15 minutes prior to moving such soil. Disturbed surface areas (OB) On the last day of active operations prior to a weekend, holiday, or any other period when active operations will not occur for not more than four consecutive days: apply water with a mixture of chemical sta- bilizer diluted to not less. than 1/20 of the concentration required to maintain a stabilized surface for a period of six months; OR (1 B) Apply chemical stabilizers prior to wind event; OR (2B) Apply water to all unstabilized disturbed areas 3 times per day. If there is any evidence of wind driven fugitive dust, watering frequency is increased to a minimum of four times per day; OR (3B) Take the actions specified in Table 2, Item (3c); OR (4B) Utilize any combination of control actions (1 B), (2B), and (3B) such that, in total, these actions apply to all disturbed surface areas. Unpaved roads (1 C) Apply chemical stabilizers prior to wind event; OR (2C) Apply water twice [once] per hour during active operation; OR (3C) Stop all vehicular traffic. Open storage piles (1 D) Apply water twice [once] per hour; OR (2D) Install temporary coverings. Paved road track -out (1 E) Cover all haul vehicles; OR (2E) Comply with the vehicle freeboard requirements of Section 23114 of the California Vehicle Code for both public and private roads. All Categories (1 F) Any other control measures approved by the Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA as equivalent to the methods specified in Table 1 may be used. Mestre Greve Associates Exhibit 2 SCAQMD Rule 403 Tablet TABLE 2 DUST CONTROL ACTIONS FOR EXEMPTION FROM PARAGRAPH (d)(3) FUGITIVE DUST SOURCE CATEGORY CONTROL ACTIONS Earth -moving (except construction cutting and filling areas, and miningOfficer, operations) (la) Maintain soil moisture content at a minimum of 12 percent, as determined by ASTM method D-2216, or other equivalent method approved by the Executive the California Air Resources Board, and the U.S. EPA. Two soil moisture evaluations must be conducted during the first three hours of active operations during a calendar day, and two such evaluations each subsequent four-hour period of active operations; OR (1a-1) For any earth -moving which is more than 100 feet from all property lines, conduct watering as necessary to prevent visible dust emissions from exceeding 100 feet in length in any direction. Earth -moving: Construction fill areas: ^ (1b) Maintain soil moisture content at a minimum of 12 percent, as determined by ASTM method D-2216, or other equivalent method approved by the Executive Officer, the California Air Resources Board, and the U.S. EPA. For areas which have an optimum moisture content for compaction of less than 12 percent, as determined by ASTM Method 1557 or other equivalent method approved by the Executive Officer and the California Air Resources Board and the U.S. EPA, complete the compaction process as expeditiously as possible after achieving at least 70 percent of the optimum soil moisture content. Two soil moisture evaluations must be conducted during the first three hours of active operations during a calendar day, and two such evaluations during each subsequent four-hour period of active operations. Earth -moving: Construction cut areas and mining operations:inaccessible (1c) Conduct watering as necessary to prevent visible emissions from extending more than 100 feet beyond the active cut or mining area unless the area is to watering vehicles due to slope conditions or other safety factors. Disturbed surface areas (except completed grading areas) (2a/b) Apply dust suppression in sufficient quantity and frequency to maintain a stabilized surface. Any areas which cannot be stabilized, as evidenced by wind driven fugitive dust must have an application of water at least twice per day to at least 80 [70] percent of the unstabilized area. Disturbed surface areas: Completed grading areas (2c) Apply chemical stabilizers within five working days of grading completion; OR (2d) Take actions (3a) or (3c) specified for inactive disturbed surface areas: Inactive disturbed surface areas (3a) Apply water to at least 80 [70] percent of all inactive disturbed surface areas on a daily basis when there is evidence of wind driven fugitive dust, excluding any areas which are inaccessible to watering vehicles due to excessive slope or other safety conditions; OR (3b) Apply dust suppressants in sufficient quantity and frequency to maintain a stabilized surface; OR (3c) Establish a vegetative ground cover within 21 [30] days after active operations have ceased. Ground cover must be of sufficient density to expose less than 30 percent of unstabilized ground within 90 days of planting, and at all times thereafter; OR (3d) Utilize any combination of control actions (3a), (3b), and (3c) such that, in total, these actions apply to all inactive disturbed surface areas. Unpaved Roads (4a) Water all roads used for any vehicular traffic at least once per every two hours of active operations [3 times per normal 8 hour work day]; OR (4b) Water all roads used for any vehicular traffic once daily and restrict vehicle speeds to 15 miles per hour; OR (4c) Apply a chemical stabilizer to all unpaved road surfaces in sufficient quantity and frequency to maintain a stabilized surface. Open storage piles (5a) Apply chemical stabilizers; OR (5b) Apply water to at least 80 [70] percent of the surface area of all open storage piles on a daily basis when there is evidence of wind driven fugitive dust; OR (5c) Install temporary coverings; OR (5d) Install a three -sided enclosure with walls with no more than 50 percent porosity which extend, at a minimum, to the top of the pile. All Categories (6a) Any other control measures approved by the Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA as equivalent to the methods specified in Table 2 may be used. Mestre Greve Associates Exhibit 3 SCAQMD Rule 403 Table 2 APPENDIX C MSHCP DOCUMENTS Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority A5ointTowers Authority December 6, 2004 Tim Hults City of San Jacinto, Community Development Department 241 E. Main Street, San Jacinto, CA 92583 RE: WRC RCA Joint Project Review, Silverstone Development Co. Inc TM 32376 Dear Tim, With this letter please find a copy of the JPR results for the above project. The project application was received complete and in a timely manner was included with others for review on October 27, 2004 in the first set of projects that were processed. The first set of approximately 20 projects was reviewed by DUDEK when the RCA was able to get the contract for services done. The results were completed by DUDEK on November 11, 2004 and returned a few days later. The files were returned in hard copy, converted to electronic files and sent to the resource agencies the day they were received. The files have been reviewed by the Resource Agencies and not comments have been received. The results of this case should have been returned to you long ago, it was an oversight that I take full responsibility for. Inadvertently the file was resubmitted with later cases and went back to DUDEK accidentally. The originals are in transit back to the RCA at this time and when they arrive I will hand deliver them to your office with the originals of the attached results. My a'.ologie to the City and especially your project developer for any inconvenience. n raff Agency Se RCA ces Officer City of Banning + City of Beaumont + City of Calimesa +City of Canyon Lake +City of Corona City of Hemet + City of Lake Elsinore *City of Moreno Valley + City of Murrleta + City of Norco City of Perris + City of Riverside +City of San Jacinto *City of Temecula County of Riverside RCA JPR REVIEW Project Information JPR #: 04 10 27 02 Permitee: Citv of San Jacinto Site Acreage: 97 acres Criteria Consistency Review Data: Date: 1 l / 1 I /2004 Applicable Core/Linkage: _Proposed Core 5 and Proposed Linkage 11 Area Plan: San Jacinto Valley APN Sub -Unit Cell Group Cell 433-040-057 1 — Gilman Springs/ Southern Badlands N/A 2674 433-040-058 • 1 — Gilman Springs/ Southern Badlands N/A 2674 433-050-005 1 — Gilman Springs/ Southern Badlands N/A 2674 433-060-001 1 — Gilman Springs/ Southern Badlands N/A 2674 433-060-002 N/A 434-160-030 N/A _ 433-170-038 F N/A N/A = Not in Criteria Area Comments: a. The project site is located entirely within independent Cell 2674. In this area, Proposed Core 5 (Upper San Jacinto River) and Proposed Linkage I I (Soboba/Gilman Springs) are planned to incorporate portions of the Upper San Jacinto River and areas linking the Upper San Jacinto River to the Badlands and the San Jacinto Mountains into the MSHCP Conservation Area. Reserve Assembly activities in this area are anticipated to be focused on areas north of the existing levee along the Upper San Jacinto River. The project site is located south of the existing levee. The portion of Cell 2674 within which the project site is located is therefore not a primary focus of Reserve Assembly and development of the site as proposed would riot conflict with IvISHCP Reserve Assembly goals. b. Development plans included with the application materials indicate that the entire site is proposed to be developed with no areas retained as natural open space and no apparent areas available for inclusion in the MSHCP Conservation Area. As noted in Item (a) above, development of the entire project site as proposed would not conflict with MSHCP Reserve Assembly goals. 11/15/2004 1 of 3 RCA JPR REVIEW c. According to the development plans included with the application materials, the northern portion of the site would be allocated for detention basin and park uses. It is assumed that these uses would result in some natural habitat remaining these areas. Given the location of the site south of the levee, however, and the proposed detention basin and park uses, these areas do not appear to be suitable candidates for inclusion in the MSHCP Conservation Area. d. Planning species within Proposed Core 5 and Proposed Linkage I I (and San Jacinto Valley Area Plan Subunit I — Gilman Springs/Southern Badlands) of which Cell 2674 is a very small part, include a variety of narrow endemic plant species, several raptor and other bird species, arroyo toad, and several mammal species including San Bernardino kangaroo rat and Los Angeles pocket mouse. Cell 2674 is not within the survey area for any of the MSHCP plant survey species and suitable habitat for these species is not present on the site based on soils and vegetation data supplied with the application materials. The site is not located within the arroyo toad survey area and suitable habitat for this species is not present on the site due to its location south of the Upper San Jacinto River levee. Biological data supplied with the application materials conclude that San Bernardino kangaroo rat and Stephens kangaroo rat are not expected to occur on the site given current and historic onsite rangeland and agricultural activities. Burrowing owl habitat is present on the site according to the biological data submitted with the application materials; a. focused survey for burrowing owl was conducted in April 2004 and none were observed onsite. During the April 2004 survey, one active raptor nest (red-tailed hawk) was observed in a Fremont cottonwood. The site does not appear to support planning species identified for this area in the MSHCP and development of the site would not conflict with MSHCP goals with respect to these species. e. In summary, the development as proposed would not conflict with Reserve Assembly goals in the Proposed Core 5 and Proposed Linkage 11 areas. Other Plan Requirements Data: Section 6.1.2 — RiparianiRiverine/Vemal Pool Mapping Provided: YES R . NO Section 6.1 .3 Narrow Endemic Plant Species Surveys Provided: YES n NO (� Section 6.3.2 — Additional Species Surveys Provided: YES F.1 NO Comments: N/A N:A l N/A U a. Wetland mapping supplied within the application materials generally indicate the presence of isolated patches of southern riparian scrub, tamarisk scrub and mulefat scrub in the northern portion of the site, generally in areas proposed for detention basin and park uses. Black willow, Fremont cottonwood and mule fat with an understory of non-native grassland and occasional individual of cudweed aster, California Croton and tarragon were the most common species observed in these isolated patches. These isolated patches of habitat appear to meet the definition of Riparian/Riverine areas in Section 6.1.2 of 11/15/2004 2 of 3 RCA JPR REVIEW the MSHCP and it appears that these areas would not be avoided with project implementation although proposed detention basin and park uses in the northern portion of the site may provide some opportunities for avoidance. [-iowever, given the character and isolated and fragmented nature of these areas within an existing graded area as described in the application materials, it is anticipated that a biologically equivalent or superior preservation alternative willbe pursued during ACOE and CDFG wetland permitting efforts undertaken for the project. It is recommended that these permitting efforts incorporate guidelines for the biologically equivalent or superior alternative included in Section 6. 1.2 of the MSHCP and that the Permittee review these materials as they are developed to ensure consistency with the MSHCP. b. Wetland mapping supplied with the application materials does not indicate presence of suitable habitat that would trigger MSHCP survey requirements for least Bell's vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, western yellow -billed cuckoo or the fairy shrimp as identified in Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP. c. The project site is within the MSI-ICP survey areas for burrowing owl and adjacent to the survey area for San Bernardino kangaroo rat. A. focused survey for burrowing owl was conducted in April 2004 and the species was not observed. Biological data supplied with the application materials concluded that suitable habitat for San Bernardino kangaroo rat were not present onsite. No conflicts with survey requirements or measures identified in Section 6.3.2 of the MSHCP would occur. 11 f 15/2004 3 of 3 l NI de Y9 12 s H Blncks; E :neton of Exu nng Con. .cotmgur.aHabitat Block Gnnstrained Linkage Linkage Existinq Cuiii3 Linkages: 0! grained Linkage Core Linkage huncontiguor. Habitat Hock Em-,cutg Chcnnel tng Nu.04102702 Vicinity Mao vial) IVISHCP Schematic Cores and Linkages Cella tt. ,. ID .,:ell ro• v • er JPR Proiecl : , e P - • can in-, I..• ,ds (Nat a Part) _ Pu, .7Uuas, • r c C 'served Lands . Tj Preexisting C• n .v. •icnP -•eemenls San Jacinto V •• dl,. Area clonal Acquisition 0 1 Feet 1500 V :.,ntuvon Cammunnles: I Monn.ne Conilerous Forest ,.n,odlands and Forests Co, • ,al Sta.., Scrub l.,versldean Alluvial Fan Sage $ E. • it Scrubs Chaparral Playas and Vernal Pools Gras., and Riparian Scrub. Woodland, Fore - Meadows atm Marshes G. montane r: all Marsh e ' Water Developed, Disturbed Land Ago, Mural Land a - _ _r_-.r _. a_ ..NOMA % t®..oam11111111MSZK-.IMISPIN--. r_asu.... .IP0 lug No. 04102702 Criteria Area Ceti,. ,nt+rit 1VISHCP Vegt:tatiou anti Project Location CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 241 E. MAIN STREET SAN JACINTO, CA 92583 PH: (951) 487-7330 FAX: (951) 487-6779 HANS APPLICATION FOR PRIVATE PROJECTS APPLICANTS NAME: Silverstone Development Co., Inc. ADDRESS: 245 Fisher Avenue, Suite B-4 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 CONTACT: Tim Hamilton DATE: October 6, 2004 PHONE NO. (714) 327-0153 FAX NO. (949) 916-5700 E-MAIL: FILE NO(s): Zone Change & Pre -zone Change No. 3-04, TM 32376, and PUD, and annexation of APN's 433060001 & 433060002. PROJECT NAME: Western Village APN'S: 433040057*, 433040058*, 433050005*, 433060001*, 433060002, 434160030, 433170038 Note: * = parcels in a proposed criteria area cell MSHCP CELL NO.: 2674 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Western Village is a proposed Planned Unit Development of 336 detached single family homes, two park sites, and a detention basin on 96.8 acres. The annexation of two 8.28 acre parcels is proposed. The zone change would change the existing zoning of R-1, C-1 and County W-2 to R-1 PUD. LOCATION: North side of the Ramona Expressway, opposite the northerly extension of San Jacinto Avenue. Describe any unique biological features: None. Quantify any anticipated impacts resulting from the proposed development: No on -site biological assets on -site to impact. Explain how the proiect design incorporates or complies with the criteria within the affected cell(s: HANS meeting determined none of the parcels are proposed for acquisition or habitat conservation. A Burrowing Owl survey was conducted with negative results. Have any biological surveys been performed on the proiect site? Yes X No If so, please attach copies. MEETING NOTES: Date: September 9, 2004 Participants: Julie Greene, Riverside County Planning Department; Tim Hamilton, Silver - stone Development Co., applicant; Ted Frattone, Hunsaker & Associates; John Freiman, Contract Planner, City of San Jacinto Results: It was determined the area of interest in this cell was north of the project (north of the San Jacinto River levee), and property associated with this project was not needed for habitat conservation. Additional information: CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 241 E. MAIN STREET SAN JACINTO, CA 92583 PH: (951) 487-7330 FAX: (951) 487-6779 MSHCP JOINT PROJECT REVIEW APPLICATION FOR PRIVATE PROJECTS APPLICANTS NAME: Silverstone Development Co., Inc. ADDRESS: 245 Fisher Avenue, Suite B-4 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 CONTACT: Tim Hamilton DATE: October 6, 2004 PHONE NO. (714) 327-0153 FAX NO. (949) 916-5700 E-MAIL: FILE NO(s): Zone Change & Pre -zone Change No. 3-04, TM 32376, and PUD, and annexation of APN's 433060001 & 433060002. PROJECT NAME: Western Village APN'S: 433040057*, 433040058*, 433050005*, 433060001*, 433060002, 434160030, 433170038 Note: * = parcels in a proposed criteria area cell MSHCP CELL NO.: 2674 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Western Village is a proposed Planned Unit Development of 336 detached single family homes, two park sites, and a detention basin on 96.8 acres. The annexation of two 8.28 acre parcels is proposed. The zone change would change the existing zoning of R-1, C-1 and County W-2 to R-1 PUD. LOCATION: North side of the Ramona Expressway, opposite the northerly extension of San Jacinto Avenue. ATTACHMENTS: HANS APPLICATION PROJECT EXHIBIT(s) LOCATION/CELL EXHIBITS SUMMARY OF HANS MEETING APPENDIX D SITE GRADING RECOMMENDATIONS December 22, 2003 -4- Project No. 644-3245 03-12-838 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon our field investigation and laboratory testing, it is our opinion that the proposed residential development is feasible from a soil mechanic's standpoint provided that the recommendations included in this report are considered in building foundation design and site preparation. Due to the somewhat loose condition of the surface soils and the potential for liquefaction occurring within the soils underlying the site, remedial grading is recommended for the building areas. We recommend that remedial grading within the proposed building areas include the overexcavation and recompaction of the loose near surface soils as well as the primary foundation bearing soils. Specific recommendations for site preparation are presented in the Site. Grading section of this report. Based upon the inconsistent condition of the deeper silty sand layers encountered below the present groundwater table, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction occurring at the site is significant. In the event that liquefaction occurs within the susceptible silty sand layer encountered within our borings, the surface manifestations are expected to be relatively uniform. The proposed remedial grading will provide a uniform mat of compacted soil that should help span differential settlements related to liquefaction. Based upon our investigation and analysis, it is our opinion that additional liquefaction related mitigation measures in addition to the recommended remedial grading should be considered. The site is located in one of the more seismically active areas in California. Design professionals should be aware of the site setting and the potential for earthquake activity during the anticipated life of the structure should be acknowledged. The accelerations that may be experienced on the site (as previously discussed) should be considered in design. The seismic provisions included in the Uniform Building Code for Seismic Zone 4 should be considered the minimum design criteria. Pertinent 1997 UBC Seismic Design Criteria is summarized in Appendix C. Caving did occur within our borings and the potential for caving should be expected within deeper excavations. All excavations should be constructed in accordance with the normal Ca1OSHA excavation criteria. On the basis of our observations of the materials encountered, we anticipate that the near surface sandy silts and silty sands will be classified by CalOSHA as Type C. Soil conditions should be verified in the field by a "Competent person" employed by the Contractor. The near surface soils encountered during our investigation were found to be non -expansive. Laboratory testing indicated an Expansion Index of 3 for the surface silty sands that corresponds with the "very low" expansion category in accordance with UBC Table 18-I-B. The following recommendations present more detailed design criteria that have been developed on the basis of our field and laboratory investigation. The recommendations are based upon non - expansive soils criteria. Foundation Design: The results of our investigation indicate that either conventional shallow continuous footings or isolated pad footings that are supported upon properly compacted soils, may be expected to provide adequate support for the proposed structure foundations. Building pad grading should be performed as described in the Site Grading Section of this report to provide for uniform and firm bearing conditions for the structure foundations. Sladden Engineering December 22, 2003 .5- Project No. 644-3245 03-12-838 Footings should extend at least 12 inches beneath lowest adjacent grade. Isolated square or rectangular footings should be at least 2 feet square and continuous footings should be at least 12 inches wide. Continuous footings may be designed using an allowable bearing value of 1500 pounds per square foot (psf) and isolated pad footings may be designed using an allowable bearing pressure of 1800 psf. The allowable bearing pressures are applicable to dead and frequently applied live loads. The allowable bearing pressures may be increased by 113 to resist wind and seismic loading. Care should be taken to see that bearing or subgrade soils are not allowed to become saturated from the ponding of rainwater or irrigation. Drainage from the building area should be rapid and complete. The recommendations provided in the preceding paragraph are based on the assumption that all footings will be supported upon properly compacted engineered fill soils. All grading should be performed under the testing and inspection of the Soils Engineer or his representative. Prior to the placement of concrete, we recommend that the footing excavations be inspected in order to verify that they extend into compacted soil and are free of loose and disturbed materials. Settlements: Settlements resulting from the anticipated foundation loads should be minimal provided that the recommendations included in this report are considered in foundation design and construction. The estimated ultimate settlements are calculated to be approximately one inch when using the recommended bearing values. As a practical matter, differential settlements between footings can be assumed as one-half of the total settlement. Additional seismically induced or liquefaction related settlements of up to 4 inches should also be considered. The potential differential settlements should be approximately % of the total settlements. Lateral Design: Resistance to lateral loads may be provided by a combination of friction acting at the base of the slabs or foundations and passive earth pressure along the sides of the foundations. A coefficient of friction of 0.40 between soil and concrete may be used with consideration to dead load forces only. A passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per square foot, per foot of depth, may be used for the sides of footings that are poured against properly compacted native or approved non -expansive import soils. Passive earth pressure should be ignored within the upper 1 foot except where confined (such as beneath a floor slab). Retaining Walls: Retaining walls may be necessary to accomplish the proposed construction. Lateral pressures for use in retaining wall design can be estimated using an equivalent fluid weight of 35 pcf for level free -draining native backfill conditions. For walls that are to be restrained at the top, the equivalent fluid weight should be increased to 55 pcf for level free - draining native backfill conditions. Backdrains should be provided for the full height of the walls. Expansive Soils: Due to the prominence of "very low" expansion category soils near the surface, the expansion potential of the foundation bearing soils should not be a controlling factor in foundation or floor slab design. Expansion potential should be reevaluated subsequent to grading. Sladden Engineering December 22, 2003 -6- Project No. 644-3245 03-12-838 Concrete Slabs -on -Grade: All surfaces to receive concrete slabs -on -grade should be underlain by a minimum compacted non -expansive fill thickness of 24 inches, placed as described in the Site Grading Section of this report. Where slabs are to receive moisture sensitive floor coverings or where dampness of the floor slab is not desired, we recommend the use of an appropriate vapor barrier or an adequate capillary break. Vapor barriers should be protected by sand in order to reduce the possibility of puncture and to aid in obtaining uniform concrete curing. Reinforcement of slabs -on -grade in order to resist expansive soil pressures should not be necessary. However, reinforcement will have a beneficial effect in containing cracking due to concrete shrinkage. Temperature and shrinkage related cracking should be anticipated in all concrete slabs -on -grade. Slab reinforcement and the spacing of control joints should be determined by the Structural Engineer. Soluble Sulfates: The soluble sulfate concentrations of the surface soils were determined to be less than 100 parts per million (ppm). This is within the usual allowable limits for the use of Type II cement and the use of Type V cement or special sulfate resistant concrete mixes should not be necessary. Tentative Pavement Design: All paving should be underlain by a minimum compacted fill thickness of 12 inches (excluding aggregate base). This may be performed as described in the Site Grading Section of this report. R-Value testing was not conducted during our investigation but based upon the sandy nature of the surface soils, an R-Value of approximately 50 appears appropriate for preliminary pavement design. The following preliminary pavement sections are based upon a design R- Value of 50. On -site Roadways limited to auto and light truck traffic (Traffic Index = 5.5) Use 3.0 inches of asphalt on 6.0 inches of Class 2 base material Aggregate base should conform to the requirements for Class 2 Aggregate base in Section 26 of CalTrans Standard. Specifications, January 1992. Asphaltic concrete should conform to Section 39 of the CalTrans Standard Specifications. The recommended sections should be provided with a uniformly compacted subgrade and precise control of thickness and elevations during placement. Pavement and slab designs are tentative and should be confirmed at the completion of site grading when the subgrade soils are in -place. This will include sampling and testing of the actual subgrade soils and an analysis based upon the specific traffic information. Shrinkage and Subsidence: Volumetric shrinkage of the material that is excavated and replaced as controlled compacted fill should be anticipated. We estimate that this shrinkage could vary from 20 to 25 percent. Subsidence of the surfaces that are scarified and compacted should be between 3 and 6 tenths of a foot. This will vary depending upon the type of equipment used, the moisture content of the soil at the time of grading and the actual degree of compaction attained. These values for shrinkage and subsidence are exclusive of losses that will occur due to the stripping of the organic material from the site. Sladden Engineering December 22, 2003 -7• Project No. 644-3245 03-12-838 General Site Grading: All grading should be performed in accordance with the grading ordinance of the City of San Jacinto, California. The following recommendations have been developed on the basis of our field and laboratory testing and are intended to provide a uniform compacted mat of soil beneath the building slabs and foundations. 1. Site Clearing: Proper site clearing will be very important. Any existing vegetation, slabs, foundations, abandoned underground utilities or irrigation lines should be removed from the proposed building areas and the resulting excavations should be properly backfilled. Soils that are disturbed during site clearing should be removed and replaced as controlled compacted fill under the direction of the Soils Engineer. 2. Preparation of Building and Foundation Areas: In order to provide adequate and uniform bearing conditions, we recommend overexcavation throughout the proposed building areas. The building areas should be overexcavated to firm native soils. Overexcavation depths are expected to vary from 3 to 5 feet below existing grade. The exposed soils should be scarified to a depth of 1-foot, moisture conditioned and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. The excavated material may then be replaced as engineered fill material as recommended below. 3. Placement of Compacted Fill: Within the building pad area, fill materials should be spread in thin lifts, and compacted at near optimum moisture content to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. Imported fill material shall have an Expansion Index not exceeding 20. The bottom of the excavations should be stable and unyielding prior to fill placement. The contractor shall notify the Soils Engineer at least 48 hours in advance of importing soils in order to provide sufficient time for the evaluation of proposed import materials. The contractor shall be responsible for delivering material to the site that complies with the project specifications. Approval by the Soils Engineer will be based upon material delivered to the site and not the preliminary evaluation of import sources. Our observations of the materials encountered during our investigation indicate that compaction within the native soils will be most readily obtained by means of heavy rubber tired equipment and/or sheepsfoot compactors. A uniform and near optimum moisture content should be maintained during fill placement and compaction. 4. Preparation of Slab and Paving Areas: All surfaces to receive asphalt concrete paving or exterior concrete slabs -on -grade, should be underlain by a minimum compacted fill thickness of 12 inches. This may be accomplished by a combination of overexcavation, scarification and recompaction of the surface, and replacement of the excavated material as controlled compacted fill. Compaction of the slab and pavement areas should be to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction. 5. Testing and Inspection: During grading tests and observations should be performed by the Soils Engineer or his representative in order to verify that the grading is being performed in accordance with the project specifications. Field density testing shall be performed in accordance with applicable ASTM test standards. Sladden Engineering December 22, 2003 -8 Project No. 644-3245 03-12-838 The minimum acceptable degree of compaction shall be 90 percent of the maximum dry density as obtained by the ASTM D1557-91 test method. Where testing indicates insufficient density, additional compactive effort shall be applied until retesting indicates satisfactory compaction. GENERAL The findings and recommendations presented in this report are based upon an interpolation of the soil conditions between boring locations and extrapolation of these conditions throughout the proposed building area. Should conditions encountered during grading appear different than those indicated in this report, this office should be notified. This report is considered to be applicable for use by Silverstone Development Company, Inc. for the specific site and project described herein. The use of this report by other parties or for other projects is not authorized. The recommendations of this report are contingent upon monitoring of the grading operations by a representative of Sladden Engineering. All recommendations are considered to be tentative pending our review of the grading operations and additional testing, if indicated. If others are employed to perform any soil testing, this office should be notified prior to such testing in order to coordinate any required site visits by our representative and to assure indemnification of Sladden Engineering. We recommend that a pre -job conference be held on the site prior to the initiation of site grading. The purpose of this meeting will be to assure a complete understanding of the recommendations presented in this report as they apply to the actual grading performed. Sladden Engineering APPENDIX E FEMA CLOMAR-F DOCUMENTS Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 THE HONORABLE PATRICK WILLIAMS MAYOR, CITY OF SAN JACINTO 201 EAST MAIN STREET SAN JACINTO , CA 92583-0000 DEAR MAYOR WILLIAMS: December 28, 2004 CASE NO.: 05-09-0182C COMMUNITY: CITY OF SAN JACINTO, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA COMMUNITYNO.: 065Q56 This is in reference to a request that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) determine if the property described in the enclosed document is located within an identified Special Flood Hazard Area, the area that would be inundated by the flood baying a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood), on the effective National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map. Using the information submitted and the effective NFIP map, our determination is shown on the attached Conditional Letter of Map Revision based on Fill (CLOMR-F). Comment Document. This comment document provides additional information regarding the effective NFIP map, the legal description of the property and our comments regarding this proposed project Additional documents are enclosed which provide information regarding the subject property and CLOMR Fs. Please see the List of Enclosures below to determine which documents are enclosed. Other attachments specific to this request may be included as referenced in the Determination/Comment document. If you have any questions about this letter or any of the enclosures, please contact the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336-2627 (877-FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 3601 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 600, Alexandria, VA 22304-6439. Sincerely, Doug Bellomo, P.E., CFM, Chief Hazard Identification Section, Mitigation Division Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate LIST OF ENCLOSURES: CLOMR-F COMMENT DOCUMENT cc: Mr. Tanum A. Atayee Page 1 of 3 Date: December 28, 2004 Case No.: 05-09.0182C CLOMR-F osTARTif Federal Emergency Management Agency x' Washington, D.C. 20472 rND SSA CONDITIONAL LETTER OF MAP REVISION BASED ON FILL COMMENT DOCUMENT COMMUNITY AND MAP PANEL INFORMATION LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION COMMUNITY CITY OF SAN JACINTO, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Proposed Lots 196 through 202, 226 through 236, 252 through 258, and 263 through 328, Tract 32376, Western Village COMMUNITY NO.: 065056 NUMBER: 0650560005D;0602451490C AFFECTED MAP PANEL NAME CITY OF SAN JACINTO, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DA1E: 5117/1990; 9/30/1988 FLOODING SOURCE: SAN JACINTO RIVER APPROXIMATE LATITUDE & LONGRUDEOF PROPERTY: 33.804,-118.961 SOURCE OF LAT & LONG: PRECISION MAPPING STREETS 7.0 DATUM: NAD 83 COMMENT TABLE REGARDING THE PROPOSED PROPERTY (PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS NOT A FINAL DETERMINATION. A FINAL DETERMINATION WILL BE MADE UPON RECEIPT OF AS -BUILT INFORMATION REGARDING THIS PROPERTY.) LOT BLOCK/ SECTION SUBDIVISION STREET OUTCOME WHAT WOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE SFHA FLOOD ZONE 1%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD ELEVATION (NGVO 29) LOWEST ADJACENT GRADE ELEVATION (NGVD 29) LOWEST LOT ELEVATION (NGVD 29) 196-Tract32376 202 — _ Property X (unshaded) 1531.0 feet _ 1532.9 feet Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) - The SFHA is an area that would be inundated by the flood having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood). ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS (Please refer to the appropriate section on Attachment 1 for the additional considerations listed below.) DETERMINATION TABLE (CONTINUED) ZONE A CONDITIONAL LOMR-F DETERMINATION STU DY U NDERWAY ANNEXATION This document provides the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Fin for the property described above. Using the information submitted determined that the proposed property(ies) would not be located in the or exceeded in any given year (base flood) if built as proposed. Our elevations, and a completed Community Acknowledgement form. flooding in accordance with Part 65.5(aX4) of our regulations. Further be found in FEMA Technical Bulletin 10-01. A copy of this bulletin can (877-FEMA MAP) or from our web site at http://www.fema.gov/mit/tb1001.pdf. the proposed project in relation to the SFHA shown on the effective NFIP This comment document is based on the flood data presently available. you have any questions about this document, please contact the FEMA addressed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 3601 Eisenhower ----------' comment regarding a request for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision based on and the effective National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map, we have SFHA, an area inundated by the flood having a 1-percent chance of being equaled final determination will be made upon receipt of a copy of this document, as -built Proper completion of this form certifies the subject property is reasonably safe from guidance on determining If the subject property is reasonably safe from flooding may be obtained by calling the FEMA Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336-2627 This document is not a final determination; it only provides our comment on map. The enclosed documents provide additional information regarding this request. If Map Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336-2627 (877-FEMA MAP) or by letter Avenue, Suite 600, Alexandria, VA 22304-6439. Doug Bellomo, P.E., CFM, Chief Hazard Identification Section, Mitigation Division Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate Version 1.3.3 1029299.1CLOMR-F-ML094140182 Page 2 of 3 IDate: December 28, 2004 Case No.: 05-09-0182C CLOMR-F Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 Cber1 "AND se� CONDITIONAL LETTER OF MAP REVISION BASED ON FILL COMMENT DOCUMENT ATTACHMENT 1 (ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS) DETERMINATION TABLE (CONTINUED) LOT BLOCK/ SECTION SUBDIVISION STREET OUTCOME WHAT WOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE SFHA FLOOD ZONE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD ELEVATION (NGVD 29) LOWEST ADJACENT GRADE ELEVATION (NGVD 29) LOWEST LOT ELEVATION (NGVD29) 226- 236 — Tract 32376 _ Property X (unshaded) 1529.8 feet — 1531.4 feet 252- 258 — Tract 32376 — Property X (unshaded) 1527.2 feet 1528.9 feet 263- 277 _ Tract 32376 _ Property X (unshaded) 1528.9 feet 1530.4 feet 278- 281 _ Tract 32376 _ Property X (unshaded) 1526.4 feet 1526.6 feet 282- 314 — Tract 32376 _ Property X (unshaded) 1528.0 feet _ 1530.4 feet 315- 328 _ Tract 32376 _ Property X (unshaded) 1525.6 feet 1526.6 feet CONDITIONAL LOMR-F DETERMINATION (This Additional Consideration applies to the preceding 7 Properties.) Comments regarding this conditional request are based on the flood data presently available. Our final determination will be made upon receipt of this Comment Document, certified as -built elevations and/or certified as -built survey. Since this request is for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision based on Fill, we will also require the applicable processing fee, and the "Community Acknowledgement" form. Please note that additional items may be required before a final as -built determination is issued. This letter does not relieve Federal agencies of the need to comply with Executive Order 11988 on Floodplain Management in carrying out their responsibilities and providing Federally undertaken, financed, or assisted construction and improvements, or in their regulating or licensing activities. ANNEXATION (This Additional Consideration applies to the preceding 7 Properties.) Although the subject of this determination is shown on the National Flood Insurance Program map as being located in a community other than the community indicated on the Determination/Comment Document, it has been annexed by the community referenced therein. This attachment provides additional information Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336-2627 Avenue, Suite 600, Alexandria, VA 22304-6439. Doug Hazard Emergency regarding this request. (877-FEMA MAP) or by If you have any letter addressed questions about this attachment, please contact the FEMA Map to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 3601 Eisenhower —_ Version 1.3.3 1029299.1CLOMR-F-ML094140182 Bellomo, P.E., CFM, Chief Identification Secllon, Mitigation Division Preparedness and Response Directorate Page 3 of 3 Date: December 28,2004 Case No.: 0509-0182C CLOMR-F Ot'4� F�gry Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 CONDITIONAL LETTER OF MAP REVISION BASED ON FILL COMMENT DOCUMENT ATTACHMENT 1 (ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS) ZONE A (This Additional Consideration applies to the preceding 7 Properties.) The National Flood Insurance Program map affecting this property depicts a Special Flood Hazard Area that was determined using the best flood hazard data available to FEMA, but without performing a detailed engineering analysis. The flood elevation used to make this determination is based on approximate methods and has not been formalized through the standard process for establishing base flood elevations published in the Flood Insurance Study. This flood elevation is subject to change. STUDY UNDERWAY (This additional consideration applies to all properties in the CLOMR-F COMMENT DOCUMENT) This determination is based on the flood data presently available. However, the Federal Emergency Management Agency is currently revising the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) map for the community. New flood data could be generated that may affect this property. When the new NFIP map is issued it will supersede this determination. The Federal requirement for the purchase of flood insurance will then be based on the newly revised NFIP map. This attachment provides additional information Assistance Center toll free at (877) 336-2627 Avenue, Suite 600, Alexandria, VA 22304-6439. regarding this request. If you have any questions about this attachment, please contact the FEMA Map (877-FEMA MAP) or by letter addressed to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 3601 Eisenhower Doug Bellomo, P.E., CFM, Chief Hazard Identification Section, Mitigation Division Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate Version 1.3.3 1029299.1CLOMR-F-ML094140182 APPENDIX F TRAFFIC STUDY RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES 9.0 Findings The study area intersections are currently operating at Level of Service D or better during existing peak hour conditions. The proposed development is projected to generate approximately 3,292 trip -ends per day with 258 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 347 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. The proposed project would generate 3,570 less trip -ends per day with 105 less vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 331 less vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour than the existing zoned land uses. During existing plus project conditions, all study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service D or better during peak hours with the exception of the intersection of San Jacinto Avenue at Ramona Expressway, which is projected to operate at an unsatisfactory level of service. During Project Buildout (Year 2007) Without Project conditions, all study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service D or better with the exception of the intersections of San Jacinto Avenue at Ramona Expressway and Alessandro Avenue at Ramona Expressway, which are projected to operate at an unsatisfactory level of service. During Project Buildout (Year 2007) Plus Project conditions, all study area intersections are projected to continue to operate at Level of Service D or better with the exception of the intersections of San Jacinto Avenue at Ramona Expressway and Alessandro Avenue at Ramona Expressway, which are projected to operate at an unsatisfactory level of service. However, with the implementation of recommended improvements included in Table 7, all study area intersections are projected to improve to Level of Service D or better during peak hour conditions. 9-1 The internal circulation provided on the Site Plan is adequate to meet City of San Jacinto standards if the recommendations included in this report are implemented. The project should contribute towards intersection improvements based upon the fair -share analysis included in this report or participate in a citywide fee program if.adopted by the City. 9-2 10.0 Recommendations Complete half -section street improvements for Ramona Boulevard, San Jacinto Avenue and Alessandro Avenue adjacent to the project site. Participate in the funding of the traffic signals at the study area intersections of San Jacinto Avenue at Ramona Expressway and Alessandro Avenue at Ramona Expressway. The project's pro-rata share at these intersections is shown in Table $. The project should receive credit for the construction of these two traffic signals for any citywide traffic signal fee if these intersections are included in the fee program. Participate in a pro-rata share of off -site roadway improvements based upon fair -share analysis or participate in any City of San Jacinto adopted Roadway Fee Program. Complete internal circulation system per City of San Jacinto standards. In conjunction with the preparation of precise grading and landscape plans, sight distance should be reviewed at project access points per City of San Jacinto and Caltrans standards. Stop signs, stop bars and stop legends should be provided at the project access points. Recommendations are summarized on Exhibit V. 10-1 1 Complete all streets to city of San Jacinto standards. Review sight distance per city of San Jacinto standards at project access points at time preparation of final grading plans. Complete half -section improvements adjacent to the project. V H .. fA i! Cottonwood Ave. O 1594-04-DI (ExV) 0 0 Exhibit V Recommendations Install stop signs, stop bard and stop legends at project access points. E Participate in funding to install traffic signals. Participate in funding to install traffic signals. W. Main St. WESTERN VILLAGE (TTM 32376) TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, San Jacinto, California Legend: = Traffic Signal = Stop Sign 150' J = Left Turn Pocket (Length) RI( engineering group, Inc. APPENDIX G SERVICE LETTERS Board of Trustees Megan Cope, President Deborah Rex, Clerk Willie Hamilton, Member John Norman, Member John Schouten, Member Peter P. Demyan, Ph.D., District Superintendent pdemyan@sanjacinto.k12.ca.us February 15, 2005 District Administrative Office 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue San Jacinto, CA 92583-5626 Telephone (951) 929-7700 Fax (951) 658-3574 web site: sanjacinto.k12.ca.us Mr. Ted Frattone Silverstone Development RE: Will Serve letter This correspondence shall serve as notification that the, San Jacinto Unified School District, will serve Tract 32376, located within the San Jacinto School District boundaries. For further information please contact Danielle Kleinman at 909 929-7700 Ext. 4224. Sincerely, a44140L. e Arthur (Director of Planning and Facilities Djk Joseph R. Busek, Asst. Supt. Business & Facilities jbusek@sanjacinto.k12.ca.us Fax (951) 652-7350 Myrna Rohr, Asst. Supt. Educational Services mrohr@sanjacinto.k12.ca.us Fax (951) 929-2890 Byron K. Isaac, Asst. Supt. Personnel Services bisaac@sa njacinto.k12. CA. US Fax (951) 652-6250 Craig Anthony Fire Chief Proudly serving the unincorporated areas of Riverside County and the Cities of: Banning 3eaumont Calimesa :anyon Lake Coachella Desert Hot Springs Indian Wells Indio Lake Elsinore La Quinta Moreno Valley Palm Desert Perris Rancho Mirage San Jacinto Temecula Board of Supervisors Bob Buster, District 1 John Tavaglione, District 2 Jim Venable,' District 3 Roy Wilson, District 4 Marion Ashley District 5 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT In cooperation with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection 210 West San Jacinto Avenue • Perris, California 92570 • (909) 940-6900 • Fax (909) 940-6910 12-27-2004 To: John Freiman, City of San Jacinto From: Scott DeForge/ RCO Fire -Planning The following conditions are requested on: San Jacinto Tract # 32376 For residential areas, approved standard fire hydrants, located at each intersection and spaced 330 feet apart with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for a 2- hour duration at 20 PSI. Blue dot retro-reflectors shall be placed in the street 8 inches from centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. Any turn or turn -around requires a minimum 38-foot turning radius. All structures shall be accessible from an approved roadway to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior of the first floor. ECS Note: The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. Two sets of water plans are to be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. In the interest of Public safety, the project shall provide an Alternate or Secondary Access(s). Does Montrose Avenue presently exist? There is also a concern that a major incident at either Montrose Ave and "J" or "X" streets would greatly hamper citizen egress as well as emergency equipment access to/from the westem half of the project. Scott DeForge Riverside County Fire, Planning Section EMERGENCY SERVICES DIVISION • PLANNING SECTION • INDIO OFFICE 82-675 Highway 111, 2n0 FI., Indio, CA 92201 • (760) 863-8886 • Fax (760) 863-7072 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON' An EDISON INTERNATIONALS Company January 7, 2004 Hunsaker & Associtates 3 Hughes Irvine, CA 92618 SUBJECT'.' .Property at Western Village 'n/o.Ramona ExpresswayAPN #434-170-038 This is to advise that the subject property is located within the service territory of the Southern California Edison Company (SCE) and that the electrical loads of the project are within parameters of projected load growth, which SCE is planning to meet in this area. Our total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually; however, excluding any unforeseen problems, our plans for new distribution resources indicate that our ability to serve all customers' loads in accordance with our rules and tariffs will be adequate during the decade of the 2000's. Current conservation efforts on the part of SCE customers have resulted in energy savings. Optimization of conservation measures in this project will contribute to the overall energy savings goal. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to call me at (909) 928-8237. Sincerely, Jeff Lawrence Customer Service Planner JL/cn Planning & Development 26100 Menifee Road Romoland. CA 925S5 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® An EDISON INTERNATIONAL®' Company January 7, 2004 Hunsaker & Associtates 3 Hughes Irvine, CA 92618 SUBJECT: Property at Western Village n/oo Ramona Expresswa APN :#434-160-030 This is to advise that the subject property is located within the service territory of the Southern California Edison Company (SCE) and that the electrical loads of the project are within parameters of projected load growth, which SCE is planning to meet in this area. Our total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually; however, excluding any unforeseen problems, our plans for new distribution resources indicate that our ability to serve all customers' Toads in accordance with our rules and tariffs will be adequate during the decade of the 2000's. Current conservation efforts on the part of SCE customers have resulted in energy savings. Optimization of conservation measures in this project will contribute to the overall energy savings goal. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to call me at (909) 928-8237. Sincerely, Jeff Lawrence Customer Service Planner JL/cn Planning & Development 26100 Menifee Road Romoland, CA 92585 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON' An EDISON INTERNATIONAL g' Company January 7, 2004 Hunsaker & Associtates 3 Hughes Irvine, CA 92618 SUBJECT; Property at Western Village n/o Ramona Expressway APN #433-060-001 This is to advise that the subject property is located within the service territory of the Southern California Edison Company (SCE) and that the electrical loads of the project are within parameters of projected load growth, which SCE is planning to meet in this area. Our total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually; however, excluding any unforeseen problems, our plans for new distribution resources indicate that our ability to serve all customers' loads in accordance with our rules and tariffs will be adequate during the decade of the 2000's. Current conservation efforts on the part of SCE customers have resulted in energy savings. Optimization of conservation measures in this project will contribute to the overall energy savings goal. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to call me at (909) 928-8237. Sincerely, cam✓' Jeff Lawrence Customer Service Planner JL/cn Planning & Development 26100 Menifee Road Romoland, CA 92585 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON' An EDISON INTERNATIONAL A Company January 7, 2004 Hunsaker & Associtates 3 Hughes Irvine, CA 92618 SUBJECT: PropertyaEWestern Village n/o Ramona Expressway APN #433-040-058.r This is to advise that the subject property is located within the service territory of the Southern California Edison Company (SCE) and that the electrical loads of the project are within parameters of projected load growth, which SCE is planning to meet in this area. Our total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually; however, excluding any unforeseen problems, our plans for new distribution resources indicate that our ability to serve all customers' loads in accordance with our rules and tariffs will be adequate during the decade of the 2000's. Current conservation efforts on the part of SCE customers have resulted in energy savings. Optimization of conservation measures in this project will contribute to the overall energy savings goal. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to call me at (909) 928-8237. Sincerely, Jeff Lawrence Customer Service Planner JL/cn Planning & Development 26100 iMlenifee Road Romoland, CA 92535 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON' An EDISON INTERNATIONAL'' Company January 7, 2004 Hunsaker & Associtates 3 Hughes Irvine, CA 92618 SUBJECT: •Property at WesternVillager/o Ramona Expressway APN #434-170-05Q This is to advise that the subject property is located within the service territory of the Southern California Edison Company (SCE) and that the electrical loads of the project are within parameters of projected load growth, which SCE is planning to meet in this area. Our total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually; however, excluding any unforeseen problems, our plans for new distribution resources indicate that our ability to serve all customers' loads in accordance with our rules and tariffs will be adequate during the decade of the 2000's. Current conservation efforts on the part of SCE customers have resulted in energy savings. Optimization of conservation measures in this project will contribute to the overall energy savings goal. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to call me at (909) 928-8237. Sincerely, Jeff Lawrence Customer Service Planner JL/cn Planning & Development 26100 Nlenifee Road Romoland, CA 92585 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON* An EDISON 1 NTERNATIONAL ID Company January 7, 2004 Hunsaker & Associtates 3 Hughes Irvine, CA 92618 SUBJECT: Property at Western Village n/o Ramona Expressway APN #433-050-005 This is to advise that the subject property is located within the service territory of the Southern California Edison Company (SCE) and that the electrical loads of the project are within parameters of projected load growth, which SCE is planning to meet in this area. Our total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually; however, excluding any unforeseen problems, our plans for new distribution resources indicate that our ability to serve all customers' loads in accordance with our rules and tariffs will be adequate during the decade of the 2000's. Current conservation efforts on the part of SCE customers have resulted in energy savings. Optimization of conservation measures in this project will contribute to the overall energy savings goal. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to call me at (909) 928-8237. Sincerely, Jeff Lawrence Customer Service Planner JL/cn Planning & Development 26100 Menifee Road Romoland, CA 92585 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON' An EDISON INTERNATIONALb Company January 7, 2004 Hunsaker & Associtates 3 Hughes Irvine, CA 92618 SUBJECT: Property at Western Village n/o Ramona Expressway APN #433-060-002.'' This is to advise that the subject property is located within the service territory of the Southern California Edison Company (SCE) and that the electrical loads of the project are within parameters of projected load growth, which SCE is planning to meet in this area. Our total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually; however, excluding any unforeseen problems, our plans for new distribution resources indicate that our ability to serve all customers' loads in accordance with our rules and tariffs will be adequate during the decade of the 2000's. Current conservation efforts on the part of SCE customers have resulted in energy savings. Optimization of conservation measures in this project will contribute to the overall energy savings goal. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to call me at (909) 928-8237. Sincerely, Jeff Lawrence Customer Service Planner JL/cn Planning & Development 26100 Menifee Road Romoland. CA 92585 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON' An EDISON 1NTERNATIONALD Company January 7, 2004 Hunsaker & Associtates 3 Hughes Irvine, CA 92618 SUBJECT: Property at Western. Village n/o Ramona Expressway APN #433-040-057 This is to advise that the subject property is located within the service territory of the Southern California Edison Company (SCE) and that the electrical loads of the project are within parameters of projected load growth, which SCE is planning to meet in this area. Our total system demand is expected to continue to increase annually; however, excluding any unforeseen problems, our plans for new distribution resources indicate that our ability to serve all customers' loads in accordance with our rules and tariffs will be adequate during the decade of the 2000's. Current conservation efforts on the part of SCE customers have resulted in energy savings. Optimization of conservation measures in this project will contribute to the overall energy savings goal. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to call me at (909) 928-8237. Sincerely, Jeff Lawrence Customer Service Planner JL/cn Planning & Development 26100 Menifee Road Romoland, CA 92585 ver►n 150 S. Juanita Street Hemet, CA 92543 January 12, 2004 Mr. Ted Frahone Hunsaker & Associates Irvine, Inc. Three Hughes Irvine, CA 92618 Dear Mr. Frahone: RE: Western Village Residential Development, San Jacinto, California Verizon California will provide service to and within the development in accordance with Tariffs on file with the California Public Utilities Commission. If you have any further questions regarding this, please contact Nannette Ash at 909/929-9436. Very truly yours, Na ne tte ash`` En 'neer - Network Engineering NA: jka NARREN D. WILLIAMS ;eneral Manager -Chief Engineer RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT City of San Jacinto Community Development Department 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, Califomia 92583 Attention: .; o}+i-1 2- i Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: S? 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 951.955.1200 951.788.9965 FAX 63519.1 The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Are ..rairrago Plan fees (deveiopmcnt mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issue: No comment. This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. X This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. $.t•,..,) L 1,J p= 3 This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. k This project is located within the limits of the Districts :Ar1 i A61t-41* 4aL. Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable fees shout • be paid by cashier's check or money order only to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of building or grading permits, whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies calculations, plans and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours, ARTURO DIAZ Senior Civil Engineer Date: / c: Transportation and Land Management Agency Attn: Greg Neal Board of Directors President Richard R. Hall Vice President Randy A. Record Rodger D. Siems David J. Slawsan Ronald W. Sullivan Board Secretary Rosemarie V. Howell General Manager Anthony J. Pack Director of the Metropolitan Water District of So. Calif Randy A. Record Treasurer Joseph I. Kuebler, CPA Legal Counsel Redwine and Sherrill EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT SINCE 1950 June 8, 2004 City of San Jacinto Community Development Dept 248 E Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 Dear Colleague: Re: - SAN53-Water and/or Sewer Will Serve TTM 32376, proposed residential project for approximately 336 single family dwellings, located south of the Ramona Expressway, west of Western Village Drive intersecting San Jacinto Avenue EMWD is willing to provide water and/or sewer service to the subject project. The provisions of service are contingent upon the developer completing the necessary arrangements in accordance with EMWD rules and regulations. EMWD expects the developer to provide proper notification when a water demand assessment is required pursuant to Senate Bill 221 and/or 610. EMWD expects the developer to coordinate with the approving agency for the proper notification. Further arrangements for service from EMWD may also include plan check, facility construction, inspection, jurisdictional annexation, and payment of financial participation charges. The developer is advised to contact EMWD's New Business Development Department early in the entitlement process to determine the necessary arrangements for service, and to receive direction on the preparation of a facility Plan -of -Service, which is required prior to final engineering. EMWD's ability to serve is subject to limiting conditions, such as water shortages, regulatory requirements, legal issues, or conditions beyond EMWD's control. Thank you for your cooperation in serving our mutual customers. If you have any questions, please call me at (909) 928-3777, ext. 4467. Brian Raines, P.E. Civil Engineer New Business Development Dept B R/jw GCc: Hunsaker & Associates - Irvine Yo � Mailing Address: ERHeioz b8lPelrArish�vIrM2PM-PA32 6P1Sone: (909) 928-3777 Fax: (909) 928-6177 Location: 2270 Trumble Road Perris, CA 92570 Internet: www.emwd.ora January 4, 2005 Riverside Transit Agency PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW To: Anne Palatino, Director of Planning From: Michael McCoy, Senior Planner Subject: City of San Jacinto, Tract T-32376, "Western Village" 340 homes on 99 acres, N of Ramona Expwy and E of State St Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) Comments Bus routes involved: Existing Routes 31, 32 and 74 Summary: Silverstone Development Co proposes tentative tract map T-32376 and related planning cases for "Western Village", a 339-unit low- to medium -density residential project with parks and other uses on 99 formerly farmed acres north of Ramona Expwy and east of the Mt San Jacinto College campus area in San Jacinto. Ramona Expressway and San Jacinto St, south of the project, are designated arterial streets where bus service is likely. The residential lots are low- to medium -density and the tract's interior circulation patterns are satisfactory, providing suitable pedestrian access to transit that uses the Expressway. Three RTA bus routes currently serve the general vicinity and additional local transit is contemplated in the future for the Expressway. RTA Route 74 now begins at the College, passes by the project site along Ramona Expwy, serves central Hemet and eventually arrives at the Perris transit hub, connecting with the entire RTA system along the way. The Route 74 bus currently does not stop at the subject site. Route 32, about 1 mile distant, also starts at the College and provides local service to San Jacinto and Hemet. Route 31, also 1 mile distant, originates at a transit hub in Banning, stops at the College along State St and continues thru San Jacinto and Hemet, providing local service. Additional bus service and new routes are anticipated for this general area as it builds out in the coming years, with Ramona Expwy especially likely to carry more bus traffic. To improve safety, convenience and accessibility of transit service relative to this pro- ject, RTA staff will recommend the lead agency to require a bus turnout at the following location: • Installation of an RTA-standard, ADA-compliant bus turnout along westbound (north side of) Ramona Expwy, just west of the intersection with "K" St and San Jacinto Av and approximately behind lots 103-105; Due to an unusually high quantity of development review projects that were received by RTA from Planning departments throughout the County in December, RTA was unable to meet the Dec 13 deadline requested by San Jacinto city staff. RTA is hopeful the staff will still be able to give this recommendation timely consideration before advancing the project through planning. F:\data\Planning\MikeM\WordlDev Review\San Jacinto\2005\T-32376.doc RTA will request the bus turnout request be addressed in the forthcoming planning actions and be converted to a condition of approval for T-32376. A letter will be sent to the City advising of the requested modification. INITIAL REVIEW INFORMATION - Review completed date: January 4, 2005 Documents received at RTA: Approximately November 30, 2004; Reply -by Date: December 13, 2004; RTA review might be late. Planning Commission hearing Date: unknown or N/A ; City Council or Bd of Supervisors Agenda Date: Unknown or N/A; Thomas Guide Map pg and grid: 781, B-6; Case Numbers: T-32376, Zone Change 3-04, and Planned Unit Development Case Planner: John Freiman, 487-7330; Applicants: Silverstone Development Partners of Costa Mesa CA RTA PLANNING FOLLOW-UP: / Standard "Acceptable" letter to jurisdiction without comments Letter with comments advising project modifications re transit issues Verbal conversation with Case Planner and appropriate letter follow-up Letter sent: Date: J l ` _ SECOND REVIEW: Review materials placed in archive files: Date: F:\datalPlanning\MikeM\Word\Dev Review\San Jacinto12005\T-32376.doc Riverside Transit Agency 1825 Third Street P.O. Box 59968 Riverside, CA 92517-1968 Phone: (951) 565-5000 Fax: (951) 565-5001 January 3, 2005 John Freiman, AICP, Contract Planner Community Development Department City of San Jacinto 248 E Main St San Jacinto CA 92583 SUBJECT: Tract 32376 — Comments from RTA Thank you for the opportunity to review Tract 32376 and related cases for a 339-home residential project in San Jacinto. A copy of Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) staffs' internal review memo on this project is attached for your information, providing more detail and analysis. Although the project's comment period technically ended on December 13, RTA is hopeful that the City will still be able to accept these suggestions, a couple weeks late. During the short com- ment period an unusual quantity of County -wide development review exceeded RTA's ability to keep up with all deadlines, including San Jacinto's. Three RTA bus routes currently serve the general vicinity. RTA Route 74 begins at the College and passes by T-32376 along Ramona Expwy but the bus currently does not stop at the vacant site. Additional bus service and new routes are anticipated for this general area as it builds out in the coming years, with Ramona Expwy especially likely to carry more bus traffic. To improve safety, convenience and accessibility of transit service relative to this project, RTA staff respectfully recommends a bus tumout be installed at the following location: • Place an RTA-standard, ADA-compliant bus turnout along westbound (north side of) Ramona Expwy, just west of the intersection with "K" St and San Jacinto Av and approximately behind lots 103-105; According to the street cross-section, there appears to be enough right-of-way to accommodate the turnout. Please contact RTA if the request is impractical due to special circumstances such as utility conflicts or interference with driveways. RTA requests the recommendation be made a condition of approval for T-32376 to ensure its installation. If you need additional clarification or if I can be of further assistance, please call me at (951) 565- 5164 or contact me online at mmccoy(a�riversidetransit.Com. Sincerely,, 1 GAP Michael McCoy Senior Planner F:\data\Planning\MikeM\Word\Dev Review\San Jacinto120051RTA Lthd - T-32376.doc APPENDIX H MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM WESTERN VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM The analysis in the Initial Study for the Western Village Planned Unit Development indicates that potentially significant environmental impacts may occur with implementation of the proposed project. A number of mitigation measures are recommended for the identified significant impacts in terms of Aesthetics (light and Glare), Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Human Health, Noise, Public Services, Recreation, Transportation/Traffic, and Utilities and Service Systems. In addition, the project would need to comply with a number of standard conditions that are routinely imposed by the City. The mitigation measures for the proposed project will be adopted by the City of San Jacinto City Council, in conjunction with the adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code requires a public agency to adopt a monitoring and reporting program for assessing and ensuring the implementation of required mitigation measures applied to proposed developments. Specific reporting and/or monitoring requirements that will be enforced during project implementation shall be adopted coincidental to final approval of the project by the responsible decision maker(s). In addition, pursuant to Section 21081(a) of the Public Resources Code, findings must be adopted by the decision -maker regarding the adoption of the monitoring program, coincidental with completion of the environmental review process. This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been developed for the proposed Western Village Planned Unit Development in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6. The purpose of the MMRP is to ensure that the proposed project complies with all applicable environmental mitigation and permit requirements. The MMRP for the project designates the developer as responsible for the implementation of all mitigation measures and the City of San Jacinto as responsible for verification for developer compliance, review of all monitoring reports, enforcement actions, and document disposition. This MMRP shall be considered by the City of San Jacinto prior to completion of the environmental review process, to enable the decision -maker's appropriate response to the proposed project. In addition, the following language shall be incorporated as part of the decision -maker's findings of fact, and in compliance with requirements of the Public Resources Code: In accordance with the requirements of Section 21081(a) and 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code, the City of San Jacinto will make the following findings: ■ That a mitigation reporting and monitoring program shall be implemented for the proposed Western Village Planned Unit Development; • That through covenant and agreement, prior to the recordation of the final map, certificate of occupancy, and/or building permit for the project, the City of San Jacinto shall identify an appropriate licensed professional to provide certification that compliance with the required mitigation measures has been effected; • Site plans and/or building plans, submitted for approval by the responsible monitoring agency, shall include required mitigation measures/conditions; and • That an accountable enforcement agency and monitoring agency shall be identified for mitigation measures/conditions adopted as part of the decision -maker's final determination. The table below lists the mitigation measures that will be implemented as part of the project. The party responsible for implementation of these measures is the developer or his contractors and consultants. In order to determine if the developer has implemented these measures, the method and timing of verification are identified, along with the City department or agency responsible for monitoring/verifying that the developer has completed the applicable mitigation measure. Since the project may be implemented in phases, this MMRP should be utilized for each phase of development within the Western Village Planned Unit Development. Within the last column, space has been provided for the individual performing the monitoring to sign off that the mitigation measure has been completed. This table may be reused during each phase of development to determine and identify the applicable mitigation measures and to verify the measures have been implemented prior to issuance of occupancy permits. 2 WESTERN VILLAGE PUD MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM MITIGATION MEASURE TIMING RESPON SIBLE ENTITY AESTHETICS (LIGHT AND GLARE): PLANNING DIVISION • Any park lighting shall be directed downward and shielded to reduce Prior to issuance of glare. occupancy permit NAME: • Athletic field lighting, if any, shall be turned off upon completion of nighttime events to reduce skyglow. SIG: • When not in use, athletic field lighting, if any, shall be turned off by 11:00 PM. DATE: AIR QUALITY Short Term Impacts Mitigation Measures: Prior to the granting of the first grading permit, the applicant shall Prior to issuance of submit appropriate permits from SCAQMD indicating compliance with the measures contained in Table 1 and Table 3 of SCAQMD Rule 403. grading permit ENGINEERING DIV. Short Term Impacts Mitigation Measures: NAME • Prior to the granting of the first grading permit, the applicant shall submit appropriate permits from SCAQMD indicating compliance SIG: with the measures contained in Table 1 and Table 3 of SCAQMD Rule 403. DATE: To reduce construction equipment emissions, the following measures Field inspections should be implemented when feasible and be included in grading and during grading and improvement plans specifications for implementation by contractors: construction • Use low emission mobile construction equipment. • Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them tuned. • Turn off equipment when not in use. Avoid idling of more than 80 WESTERN VILLAGE PUD MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM AIR QUALIYT (CONT'D) minutes. • Use low sulfur fuel for stationary construction equipment. This is required by SCAQMD Rules 431.1 and 431.2. • Utilize existing power sources (Le., power poles) when feasible. This measure would minimize the use of higher polluting gas or diesel generators. • Configure construction parking to minimize traffic interference. • Minimize obstruction of through -traffic lanes. When feasible, construction should be planned so that lane closures on existing streets are kept to a minimum. • Schedule construction operations affecting traffic for off-peak hours. • Limit the application of architectural surface treatments during any one day, as feasible. • Develop a traffic plan to minimize traffic flow interference from construction activities (the plan may include advance public notice of routing, use of public transportation and satellite parking areas with a shuttle service). Long Term Impacts Mitigation Measures: The following measures should be implemented or included in the Specific Plan implementation as feasible: • Provide dedicated turn lanes as appropriate and provide roadway improvements at heavily congested roadways. • Include residential design features that encourage trip elimination or trip diversion to alternative transportation, such as pre -wiring for 220V electric charging systems. • Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. Reduce the need to PLAN CHECK AND FIELD INSPECTION ENGINEERING DIV. NAME: SIG: DATE: 4 WESTERN VILLAGE PUD MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM AIR QUALITY (CONT'D) heat or cool structures by improving thermal integrity will result in a reduced expenditure of energy and a reduction in pollutant emissions. • Install energy efficient street lighting. • Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous sources MSC-01 measure. This measure reduces the need for cooling energy in the summer. • Synchronize traffic signals. The areas where this measure would be applicable are roadway intersections within the project area. This measure would be more effective if the roadways beyond the project limits are synchronized as well. • Solar heaters and central water heaters shall be encouraged for residential uses. • Provide increased insulation beyond Title 24 requirements. • Use all -electric landscape maintenance equipment. • Orient buildings North -South, as feasible. • Improve the walking environment by providing complete sidewalks, street trees, traffic -calming and signals, safe and visually interesting pedestrian walkways, and provide interconnected bikeways/bike lanes. • Use double -paned windows to reduce thermal loss. • Install energy -efficient appliances to reduce energy consumption. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: No earlier that 45 days and no later than 20 days prior to construction or grading/site preparation activities that would occur during the nesting/breeding season of native bird species potentially nesting on the site (typically February through June), the applicant shall have a survey 5- WESTERN VILLAGE PUD MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (CONT'D) conducted by a qualified biologist to determine if active raptor nests protected by the California Fish and Game Code are present in the construction zone or within 200 feet of the construction zone. A report of this field survey shall be submitted to the appropriate agency. PRIOR TO ENGINEERING DIV. Construction can proceed if no active nests are located during this ISSUANCE OF survey. If an active nest is found during the survey, a 500-foot (this GRADING NAME: distance may be varied depending on the bird species and construction PERMIT AND activity, as determined by the biologist) fence barrier (subject to the FIELD SIG: review and approval of a qualified biologist) shall be erected around the INSPECTION nest site and clearing and construction within the fenced area shall be DURING DATE: postponed or halted, at the discretion of the Biologist monitor, until the nest is vacated and juveniles have fledged, as determined by the biologist, and there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. The biologist shall serve as a construction monitor during those periods when construction activities shall occur near active nests to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests shall occur. GRADING CULTURAL RESOURCES If potentially significant archaeological evidence (e.g., stone artifacts, dark ashy soils or burned rocks, or old glass, metal or ceramic artifacts) becomes apparent during ground disturbances, work in that location FIELD ENGINEERING DIV. NAME: should be diverted and a qualified archaeologist should be contacted INSPECTION immediately to evaluate the find. The property owner will then be DURING SIG: notified if the materials are potentially significant, and the archaeologist GRADING may recommend further study. If human remains are discovered, the DATE: Riverside County Coroner's Office must be notified immediately under state law, and all activities in the area must cease until lawful measures have been implemented. If the Coroner determines that the remains are prehistoric, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento must also be contacted under state law. The NAHC will WESTERN VILLAGE PUD MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CULTURAL RESOURCES (CONT'D) designate a Most Likely Descendent (MLD) who will have the authority to make procedural determinations concerning disposition of the remains. GEOLOGY AND SOILS • The seismic provisions included in the Uniform Building Code for PRIOR TO ENGINEERING DIV. Seismic Zone 4 should be considered the minimum design criteria. ISSUANCE OF • Remedial grading within the proposed building areas include the GRADING NAME: over -excavation and re -compaction of the loose near surface soils as PERMIT AND well as the primary foundation bearing soils. FIELD SIG: INSPECTION The specific recommendations for site preparation are found in DATE: Appendix B of the MND, and shall be considered required mitigation measures. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY • Prior to any permits, the project will comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) ENGINEERING DIV. General Permit for Construction Activity. A Notice of Intent shall be filed with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and PRIOR TO NAME: a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared ISSUANCE OF and implemented. ANY PERMITS SIG: • Prior to any permits, the developer shall obtain a permit from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) through a DATE: Conditional Letter of Map Revision {CLOMR-F} to the flood Insurance Rate Maps to allow for the development of residential structures within a known floodplain. The development shall also comply with the City of San Jacinto's Floodplain Management Ordinance. 7 WESTERN VILLAGE PUD MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY (CONT'D) A storm drain system, approved by the City Engineer, shall be developed to transport the first flush runoff to a detention basin adequate to allow for the settlement of debris and loose soils that enter the stormwater system and prevent pollutants from entering off -site drainage channels and the San Jacinto River. Said detention basin shall be designed so that no increase in runoff will occur offsite. NOISE • To reduce the potential level of impact due to traffic noise along the Ramona Expressway, a six foot -high solid masonry wall shall be erected along the Ramona Expressway frontage. • Second -story balconies should not be constructed on those residences adjacent to the Expressway. • Appropriate HVAC mechanical shall be provided to achieve a "windows closed" condition for those residences adjacent to the Expressway. • Construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. Mondays through Saturdays, with no construction permitted on Sundays. PLAN CHECK AND FIELD INSPECTION PLANNING AND BUILDING DIV'S NAME SIG: DATE: NAME: SIG: DATE: PUBLIC SERVICES • The applicant/developer shall annex to CFD 2003-1 and pay the one- time fee of $612 per dwelling unit at building permit issuance, and the mitigation fees of $637 per dwelling unit prior to final inspection. • Proof of payment of school mitigation fees at time of building permit issuance. • Payment of park fee and/or dedication of parkland as required. • For other public services, payment of mitigation fees as adopted by the City prior to final inspection. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT PLANNING DIVISION NAME: SIG: DATE: 8- WESTERN VILLAGE PUD MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM RECREATION • Payment of park fee and/or dedication of parkland as required. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS PLANNING DIVISION NAME: SIG: DATE: TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING. DIV. • The recommendations contained in the Traffic Impact Study as PLAN CHECK shown in Appendix shall be required mitigation measures for the AND FIELD NAME; project. INSPECTION SIG: • The applicant/developer shall also pay all required development fees PRIOR TO FINAL prior to final inspection. INSPECTION DATE: UTIITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS PLAN CHECK ENGINEERING DIV. • Compliance with NPDES and SWPPP requirements, City and AND FIELD INSP. EMWD standards. NAME: • Payment of the City Sewer fee of $200 per dwelling unit prior to final PRIOR TO FINAL SIG: inspection. INSPECTION DATE: 9- REDEVELOPMENT OPERATIONS MANAGER STEVEN PASAROW ACTION MINUTES FDA �.. REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL MAY 5; 2005, 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION .1 CaII to Order Mayor Buydos called the Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council to order at 7:00 p.m. 1.2 Roll Call Present: Jim Ayres, Chris Carlson Buydos, Robert Ritchie, Ken Shaw Absent: Dale Stubblefield 1.3 Invocation Reverend Bob Sauter, Faith Tabernacle, San Jacinto, gave the invocation. 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance City Treasurer Jim Potts led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1.5 Special Presentations 1.5.1 Presentation of United States Flag / Specialist Jason Hayes Jason Hayes, U.S. Army, presented City Council with an American flag flown over Iraq. 1.5.2 Proclamation 'May 2005 Is Water Awareness Month'. Peter Odencrans accepted on behalf of EMWD Board Member Randy Record. PUBLIC COMMENTS: • Steven Blake, 455 E. Seventh St. Sp. 53, San Jacinto • Richard L. KeitzfAndrew Kotyok, representing the Diamond Valley Art's Council, 140 E. Stetson Ave., PMB #297 • Paul David Chonka, 574 Cypress Ave., San Jacinto City Council Action Minutes May 5, 2005 Page 2 of 8 CONSENT CALENDAR 3.1 Warrants at 65/05/05 / Approve / Finance Director 3,2 Budget Hearing Date change from May 11, 2005 to May 31, 2005 Approve / City. Manager 3.3 City Sponsorship of American Cancer Society known as Relay for Life / Approve / City Manager 3.4 Purchase Work Order System module from H.T.E. accounting system software / Approve and Authorize Finance Director to execute purchase contract / Finance Director 3.5 Planning Technician job description and salary range / Approve / Community Development Director 3 Final Parcel Map 31717 - Nelson Development LLC / Approve and Authorize the Mayor to execute the Final Map / City Engineer 3.7 Final Parcel Map 31296 - Meritage Homes / Approve and Authorize the Mayor to execute the Final Map / City Engineer Agenda Items 3.2 and 3.3 were pulled. These items will be heard at the end of "5. City Department." M/S/C (Ayres / Shaw) moved to approve the balance of the consent calendar as presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Buydos Nays: None Abstain None Absent: Stubblefield 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 Cancellation of Land Conservation Contract - San Jacinto No. 2 / Applicant: All -Star Equities, 12250 Camino Real, San Diego, CA 92130: 1) Approve and Adopt - A De Minimis Impact finding for Tentative Cancellation of Land Conservation Contract San Jacinto No.2 2) Approve and Adopt- A Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Cancellation of Land Conservation Contract - San Jacinto No. 2 3) Approve and Adopt Resolution No. 2738 / A Resolution that approves that the Tentative Cancellation is consistent with the Williamson Act and Approves of the Tentative Cancellation of San City Council Action Minutes May 5, 2005 Page 3 of 8 Jacinto No, 2 Land Conservation Contract Community Development Director Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 7:25 p.m. No one was present to support or oppose Resolution No. 2738. City Clerk Chcuinard reported no written comments were received. Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 7:26 p.rn. M/S/C (Ayres / Shaw) moved to approve Resolution No. 2738 as presented. Motion carried 3/1. Ayes: Ayres, Shaw, Buydos Nays: Ritchie Abstain None Absent: Stubblefield 4.2 Tentative Tract Map 32376 / Applicant Silverstone Development Company Inc 1 General Plan Amendment (GPA) 7-04 request to add 16.56 acres to the General Plan and designate it as Low Density Residential PUD No. 2-04, a Planned Unite Development for a 337 unit single family detached residential development; Zone Change and Pre -zone Change No. 3-04 , a Zone Change and Pre -zone Change from County RA-5, City R-1, W-2 and C-2 to R-1 PUD (One family residential with a PUD act Map No. 32376 on 906.8 acres located north of the Ramona Expressway on both sides of the extension of San Jacinto Avenue: 1) Mitigated Negative Declaration and its associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for this project / Approve 2) Resolution No. / Approve and Adopt / A Resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 7-04, an amendment of the General Plan to add 16.56 acres to the City's General Plan as described and to designate said property as Low Density Residential 3) Ordinance No. 05-13 / Approve introduction and first reading of Ordinance No. 05-13 / An Ordinance approving PUD No. 4-04 , a 337 lot single family detach ed PUD to be known as Western Village, and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Planned Unit Development (PUD) No. 4- 04, a 337 Lot Single Family Detached PUD to be Known as Western Village, Located on 96.8 Acres on the North Side of the Ramona Expressway on Both Sides of the Extension of San Jacinto Avenue 4) Ordinance No. 05-14 / Approve introduction and first reading of Ordinance No. 05-14 / An Ordinance approving Zone Change No. 3-04 and by further motion read by title only: City Council Action Minutes May 5, 2005 Page 4 of An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California Approving Change of Zone 3-04, A Prezone Change from County RA-5 to City R-1 PUD, and From City R-1, W-2ard C-2 to R-1 PUD, on Property located Generally North of the Ramona Expressway on Both sides of the Extension of San Jacinto Avenue 5) Resolution No. / Approve and Adopt Resolution No. 1A Resolution approving Variance No. 1-05 — a request to vary from the PUD requirement for RV parking for the Western Village PUD to be located on the north side of the Ramona Expressway on both sides of the extension of San Jacinto Avenue 6) Resolution No. / Approve and Adopt Resolution No. _ f A Resolution approving Tentative Tract Map No. 32376, a 337 lot residential subdivision on the north side of the Ramona Expressway on both sides of the extension of San Jacinto Avenue / Community Development Director Tim Hamilton, Silverstone Development Co. Inc., 15 Enterprise, Suite 130, Viejo Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 7:47p.m. • Darrel Pastorius, 21770 Alessandro, San Jacinto • Bill Owen, 21680 Alessandro, San Jacinto • Jim Conner, Alta Nursery, 21750 Alessandro, San Jacinto • Fran Perry, 222 W. Sunset Lane, San Jacinto • Max Perry, 222 W. Sunset Lane, San Jacinto Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 8:39 p.m. Mayor Buydos reopened the Public Hearing at 9:12 p.m. • Hasan Nouri, Rivertech Inc., 23332 Mill Creek Dr., #210, Laguna Hills Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 9:16 p.m. MISIC (Buydos / Ayres) moved to continue item until May 19, 2005 and directed staff to return with a full report with amended Conditions of Approval and other items as discussed. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres. Ritchie, Shaw, Buydos Nays: None Abstain None Absent: Stubblefield City Counci€ Action Minutes May 5, 2005 Pace 5 of 8 Mayor Buydos closed the Public I +goring at 9:47 N m. Item was continued until May 1 g, 2005. 4.3 Ordinance Nc. 05-15 I Approve introduction and first rsadIng cf an Ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment 01-05, thereby reducing the parking requirement for drive -through restaurants and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Approving a Zone Text Amendment to Modify the Text of Article 15.03 (10), pertaining to Off -Street Parking for Drive-in Restaurants, of the San Jacinto Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance 340 Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 9:48 p.m. Nc one was present to support or oppose Ordinance No. 05-15. City Clerk Chouinard reported no written comments were received. Mayor Buydos cicsed the Public Hearing at 9:48:30 p.m. M/S/C (Ayres, / Shaw) moved to approve Ordinance No. 05-15 as presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Buydos Nays: None Abstain None Absent: Stubblefield 5. CITY DEPARTMENTS 5.1 Policy for naming public facilities / Direct staff in regards to establishing a City resolution that sets the criteria for naming new City facilities / Approve / Assistant to the City Manager There were no public comments. M/SIC (Buydos / Ayres) moved to approve Resolution No. 2750 as presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Buydos Nays: None Abstain None Absent: Stubblefield 5.2 Sponsorship of the Hemet Ryan Air Show / Approve and Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement with the Riverside County Economic Development Agency to be a $2,500 sponsorship of the Hemet Ryan Air Show There were no public comments. City_ Council Action Minutes May 5, 2005 Page 6 of 8 M/SIC (A;yres / Shaw) r overt to approve Iterr 5.2 as presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Buydos Nays: None Abstain None Absent: Stubblefield 5.3 Resolution No. 2739 / A Resolution approving the Financing of Redevelopment Activities in the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area by the Redevelopment Agency of San Jacinto of the City of San Jacinto and other matters relating thereto / Approve and Adopt / Bond Counsel There were no public comments. M/SIC (Ayres / Buydos) moved to approve Resolution No. 2739 as presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Buydos Nays: None Abstain None Absent: Stubblefield Mayor Buydos recessed the Regular Meeting at 9:58 p.m. and reconvened the Regular meeting at 10:10 p.m. 5.4 Development Agreements affecting proposed Development Impact Fees (DIF) / Direct staff / City Manager M/S/C (Buydos / Ayres) moved to bring back the Development Impact Fees resolution and agreements on May 19, 2005. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Buydos Nays: None Abstain None Absent: Stubblefield 5.5 Space Needs / Approve one year lease not to exceed $1.15 /sq ft for the old Main Street Realty building / Space Needs Committee There were no public comments. M/S/C (Buydos / Shaw) moved to approve Item 5.5 as presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Buydos Cite Council Action Minutes May 5, 2005 Pace 7 of 8 Nays: None Abstain None Absent: Stubblefield 3.2 Budget Hearing Date change from May 11, 2005 to May, 31.. 20051 Approve 1 City Manager By unanimous consensus, Council agreed to set the budg 2005. iearino f ne 2. 3.3 City Sponsorship of American Cancer Society known as Relay for Life / Approve / City Manager Mayor Buydos recessed the Regular Meeting at 9:53 to consider tne. Redevelopment Agency Agenda and the Finance Authority Agenda. Mayor Buydos reconvened the Regular Meeting at 9:58 p.m. 6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMti ER REPORTS 1 DISCUSSIONS 6.1 Request by Council Member Ritchie to discuss a part-time senior liaison position Discussion only. Direction to City Manager. 6.2 Reports Council Members gave their reports. Mayor Buydos recessed the Regular 10:22 p.m. and reconvened in closed session at 10:41 p.m. 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford & Peter Cosentini Employee Organization: Management Association No reportable action. 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford & Peter Cosentini Employee Organization: Service Employees International Union No reportable action. City Council Action Minutes May 5, 2005 Page 8 of 8 8. ADJOURNMENT With no further business coming before the City Council and followed by the Council acclimation, Mayor Buydos adjourned the meeting at 11:02 p.m. ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk City of San Jacinto by Chris Carlson Euydos Approved as read Approved as amended ACTION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL MAY 19, 2005, 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1./ Call to Order Mayor Buydos called the Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council to order at 7:02 p.m. 1.2 Roll Call Present: Jim Ayres, Chris Carlson Buydos, Robert Ritchie, Ken Shaw, Dale Stubblefield Absent: None 1.3 Invocation Reverend Bob Sauter, Faith Tabernacle, San Jacinto, Gave the invocation. 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance City Attorney John Brown led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1.5 Special Presentations None 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There were no Public Comments. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR 3.1 Warrants at 05/19/05 / Approve / Finance Director 3.2 Treasurer's Report at February 28, 2005 / Approve / Finance Director 3.3 Treasurer's Report at March 31, 2005 / Approve /Finance Director 3.4 Plans and specifications for Eagle Road and Ramona Expressway Traffic Signal and Street Improvements / Approve and Authorize City Clerk to proceed with bid advertisement for installation of traffic signal and street improvements at said intersection / City City Council Action Minutes May 19, 2005 Page 2 of 15 Engineer 3.5 Hyatt Elementary Sidewalks and Miscellaneous eous Improvements — Project NG. 05-100 Notice of Completion / Approve and Authorize release of retention in the amount of $24,442.79 thirty days after recordation ! City Engineer 3.6 Kirby Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Project No. 02-018 Notice of Completion / Approve and Authorize release of retention in the amount of $13,075.75 thirty days after recordation / City Engineer 3.7 Final Tract Map 30659 — GMAC Model Home Finance Inc / Approve and Authorize Mayor to execute the Final Map, City Manager to execute the subdivision agreement, City Clerk to release Final Map for recordation / City Engineer 3.8 Ordinance No. 05-15 / Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance 05-15 approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment 01-05, thereby reducing the parking requirement for drive -through restaurants and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Approving a Zone Text Amendment to Modify the Text of Article 15.03 (10), pertaining t Off -Street Parking for Drive -In Restaurants, of the San Jacinto Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance 340 / Community Development Director 3.9 Appropriate an amount from the General Fund to the City Council Capital Outlay line item in amount not to exceed $2,200.00 for the replacement of computer laptop / Approve / City Clerk 3.10 Request for new computer hardware - e-mail server ! Approve and Appropriate $4,200 from Undesignated Unreserved General Fund balance for purchase / Finance Director 3.11 Co-operation Agreement with the County of Riverside for the fiscal years 2006-2009 / Approve and Authorize the Mayor to execute agreement and the City Manager to execute the Notice of Participation / Redevelopment Operations Manager 3.12 Client Conflict Waiver / Approve letter and Authorize City Manager to execute waiver letter / City Attorney 3.13 Cooperation Agreement for Pool Maintenance with Valley Wide Recreation and Park District / Approve and Authorize City Manager to execute agreement / City Manager City Council Action Minutes May 19, 2005 Page 3 of 15 Phi/SIC (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubbiefield. Euvdos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 General Plan Amendment to add 16.56 acres to the General Plan designating them Low Density Residential and amend the Circulation Element to delete the extension of San Jacinto Avenue North of the Ramona Expressway: PUD No 2-04 — a Planned Unit Development of 337 unit single family detached residential development; Zone Change and Pre -zone Change No. 3-04, a Zone Change and Pre -Zone Change from County RA-5, City R-1, W-2 and C-2 to R-1 PUD (One Family Residential with a PUD overlay); Variance No. 1-05 to vary from the requirement for RV parking; and Tentative Tract Map No. 32376, on 96.8 acres located north of the Ramona Expressway on both sides of the extension of San Jacinto Avenue / Contract Planner and Community Development Director / Applicant Sillverstone Development Company Inc 1) Mitigated Negative Declaration and its associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for this project 2) Resolution No. 2741 / Approve and Adopt / A Resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 7-04, an amendment of the General Plan to add 16.56 acres to the City's General Plan as described and to designate said property as Low Density Residential 3) Ordinance No. 05-13 / Approve introduction and first reading of adopt Ordinance No. 05-13 / An Ordinance approving PUD No. 4- 04 , a 337 lot single family detach ed PUD to be known as Western Village, and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Planned Unit Development (PUD) No. 4-04, a 337 Lot Single Family Detached PUD to be Known as Western Village, Located on 96.8 Acres on the North Side of the Ramona Expressway on Both Sides of the Extension of San Jacinto Avenue 4) Ordinance No. 05-14 / Approve introduction and first reading of Ordinance No. 05-14 / An Ordinance approving Zone Change No. City Council Action Minutes May 19, 2005 Page 4 of 15 3-04 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Councii cf the City of San Jacinto, California Approving Change of Zone 3-04, A Pre=one Change from County RA-5 to City R-1 PUD, and From City R-1, ;-2and C-2 to R-1 PUD, on Property located Generally North of the Ramona Expressway on Both sides of the Extension of San Jacinto Avenue 5) Resolution No. 2742 / Approve and Adopt Resolution No. 2742 / A Resolution approving Variance No. 1-05 — a request to vary from the PUD requirement for RV parking for the Western Village PUD to be located on the north side of the Ramona Expressway on both sides of the extension of San Jacinto Avenue 6) Resolution No. 2743 / Approve and Adopt Resolution No. 2743 / A Resolution approving_ Tentative Tract Map No. 32376, a 337 lot residential subdivision on the north side of the Ramona Expressway on both sides of the extension of San Jacinto Avenue Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 7:16 p.m. Public Comments: Tim Hamilton, Silverstone/CRV Western Village, 15 Enterprise, Aliso Viejo. City Clerk Chouinard reported no written comments were received. Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 7:34 p.m. M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve Resolution Nos. 2741, 2742, 2743 as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 4.2 Pre -Zone Change No. 7-04 — a Change of Zone from City Pre -Zone R- 1 to City Pre -Zone R-2, Development Plan No. 10-04 and Tentative Tract No. 32582 on 48.86 acres of land located between Alessandro Avenue and Vernon Street north of Cypress Avenue / Contract Planner and Community Development Director 1) Approve a Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopt its associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for said City' Council Action Minutes May 19, 2005 Page 5of15 project ) Approve introduction and first reading c'f Ordinance No. 05-16 / An Ordinance approve Pre -Zone Change No. 7-04 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Change of Zone 7-04, A Pre -Zone Chance from City R-1 to City R-2, on Property Located between Alessandro Avenue and Vernon Street, North of Cypress Avenue 3) Approve introduction and first reading of Ordnance No. 05-17 / An Ordinance approving Development Plan 10-04 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto; California, approving Development Plan No. 10-04, A Development Plan for a 192 unit detached single family subdivision to be located between Alessandro Avenue and Vernon Street, north of Cypress Avenue 4) Resolution No. 2744 / A Resolution of the City Council approving Tentative Tract Map No. 32582, 192 Lot Single Family i"esidential Subdivision to be located between Alessandro Avenue and Vernon Street, North of Cypress Avenue / Approve and Adopt Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 7:45 p.m. Lindsay Record, J.D. Pierce Company, 2222 Martin Street, Ste 100, Irvine Jay Pierce, J.D. Pierce Company, 2222 Martin Street, Ste 100, Irvine David P. Denney, J.D. Pierce Company, 591 Cypress Ave., San Jacinto David Chonka, J.D. Pierce Company, 574 Cypress Ave., San Jacinto City Clerk Chouinard reported no written comments were received. Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 7:52 p.m. MIS/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve item Nos. 1, 2, 3 & 4 as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None City Council Action Minutes May 19, 2005 Page 6of15 4.3 Ordinance No. 05-18 / Approve introduction and first reading of Ordinance No. 05-18 / An Ordinance providing for the adoption of revised development impact fee schedule; and by further motion read by title only; An Ordinance of the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of California. Providing for the Adoption of a Revised Development Impact Fee Schedule Establishing and increasing certain Development Impact Fees for Applicants for Development City Manager and City Attorney *SIC (Ayres / Shaw) moved to approve Ordinance 05-18 as presented. Motion Carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Euydcs Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 4.4 Resolution No. 2745 / A Resolution establishing the fees for the administration of the Waste Management Program / Approve and Adpt / Finance Director Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 8:11 p.m. No one was present to support or oppose Resolution No. 2745. City Clerk Chouinard reported no written comments were received. Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 8:11:30 p.m. M/SIC (Shaw / Ayres) moved to approve Resolution No. 2745 as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 4.5 Planned Unit Development 1-04 Tentative Tract Map No. 32153 to facilitate a residential development of 44 single-family lots and 1 park lot located on the south side of Ramona Boulevard and west of Tiger Lane / Community Development Director 1) Approve Mitigated Negative Declaration with De Minimus Findings; 2) Approve and Adopt Resolution No. 2746 / A Resolution approving Tentative Tract No. 32153; City Council Action Minutes May 19, 2005 Page 7 of 15 3) Approve introduction and first reading of Ordinance No. 05-19 / An Ordinance approving the Panning Commission's PUD 1-04 based on the Planning Commission's Conditions of Apprcva[ and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Planned Unit Development 1-04, a 44 unit single famliy residential development located on the south side of Ramona Boulevard and west of Tiger Lane. Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearin° of 5: €2 p.m. Public Comments: Allen A. Chamberlain, River Roc, 1520 S. San Jacinto, San Jacinto, City Clerk Chouinard reported no written comments were received. Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 8:15 p.m. M!SC (Buydos / Ayres) moved to approve Item Nos. 1, 2, 3 with modification of Condition No. 34 — needs to be view fencing consistent with other projects. Motion carried 5/0, Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 4.6 Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 (LLPD No. 2) Annexation No. 41 — Distinguished Homes — T31384 & 31384-1 / City Attorney a) Resolution No. 2747 / A Resolution initiating proceedings for the Annexation of property into LLPD No 2 — Annexation No. 41/ Approve and Adopt b) Resolution No. 2748 / A Resolution approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 41 into LLPD No. 2 / Approve and Adopt c) Resolution No. 2749 / A Resolution declaring intention to annex property into LLPD No. 2 — Annexation No. 41 / Approve and Adopt M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve Resolution Nos. 2747, 2748, 2749 as presented. Motion carried 4/0. City Council Action Minutes May 19, 2005 Page 8 of 15 Ayes: Ayres, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Ritchie d) Public Hearing / At the conclusion of the public hearing if the City determines that a majority protest does not exist, by motion approve the certification of the election results for adding certain property into LLPD No 2 known as Annexation No. 41 / Approve and Adopt Resolution No. 2750 / A Resolution ordering annexation of territory into LLPD No. 2 and levying assessment - Annexation No. 41 — Distinguished Homes — T31384-1 & T31384 Mayor Buycdes opened the Public Hearing at 8: 1 9 p.m. No one was present to support or oppose Resolution No. 2750. City Clerk Chouinard reported no written comments were received and certified the election, noting the majority is in favor of the annexation and assessment, Mayor Buydos ciosed the Public Hearing at 8:20 p.m. M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve Resolution No. 2750 as presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Ritchie 5. CITY DEPARTMENTS 5.1 Development of a Specific Plan for the Ramona Expressway / Sanderson Avenue Corridor / Community Development Director 1) Select AEI CASC to prepare the Development of a Specific Plan for the Ramona Expressway / Sanderson Avenue Corridor; 2) Select Economic Research Associates to prepare the Economic Development / Market Plan for same 3) Approve the agreements for same 4) Authorize the City Manager to execute agreements for same Public Comments: Steve Slagter, S.J. Land, LLP, 6055 Abbottswood Run, LaJolla This item was continued to the June 2, 2005 meeting. Mayor Buydos recessed the Regular Meeting at 8:56 p.m. and reconvened the Regular Meeting at 9:12 p.m. City Counci`: Action Minutes May 19, 2005 Page 9 of 15 Agenda items 5.2 — 5.6 heard concurrently. Applicant representative, Thomas Riggle, TR Design Croup spoke. 5.2 Conditionel Use Perrnit 18-04 i Ratify Planning Commission's Clip 8-04 based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval for the construction of 34,398 sq ft self storage facility located at the SW corner of Community College Drive at State Street !Applicant: Southland Development LLC / Community Development Director M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve Conditional Use Permit 8-04 as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 5.3 Conditional Use Permit 15-04 / Ratify Planning Commissions CUP 15-04 based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval, allowing the construction of a 2,960 sq ft convenience store with off site beer and wine sales, 6 island gas station under 3,854 sq ft canopy approximately 300 ft north of the Ramona Expressway on the west side of State Street I Applicant: Southland Development LLC / Community Development Director There were no public comments. M!S/C (Ayres I Stubblefield) moved to approve Conditional Use Permit 15-04 as presented. Roll call vote. Motion carried 3/2. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Stubblefield Nays: Shaw, Buydos Abstain: None Absent: None 5.4 Conditional Use Permit 19-04 / Ratify Planning Commission's CUP 19-04 based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval , allowing construction of a 17,272 sq ft drug store with off -site beer, wine, hard liquor and drive -up pharmacy located at the NW corner of the Ramona Expressway at State Street / Southland Development LLC / Community Development Director Public Comments: Jim Pebley, Heritage Ranch Community Association, 500 W. Community College Dr., San Jacinto M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve Conditional Use Permit 19-04. City Council Action Minutes May 19, 2005 Page 10 of 15 Roll calf vote. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buyoos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 5.5 Conditional Use Permit 16-04 / Ratify Planning Commission's CUP 16-04 based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval, allowing the construction of a 2,448 sq ft fast food restaurant with a drive-thru located approximately 614 ft N of the Ramona Expressway / Applicant: Southland Development LLC l Community Development Director There were no public comments. M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve Conditional User Permit 16-04. Roll call vote. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 5.6 Conditional Use Permit 17-04 / Ratify Planning Commission's CUP 17-04 based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval, allowing a 3,560 sq ft fast food restaurant with a drive-thru, located 319ft S of Community College Drive / Applicant Southland Development LLC / Community Development Director There were no public comments. M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve Conditional Use Permit 17-04. Roll call vote. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 5.7 Conditional Use Permit 3-04 / Ratify Planning Commission's CUP 3- 04 based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval, allowing the construction of a leased area an unmanned wireless telecommunications facility, located at the SW corner of Lyon Avenue and Cottonwood Avenue / Applicant: Saundra Jacobs / Community Development Director Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 10:33 p.m. City Council .Action Minutes May 19, 2005 Page 11 of 15 Saundra Jacobs, Applicant, SFC Communications for Mountain Union Telecom; 25012 Marguerite FiCy, # i424, Mission Viejo Mayor Euydos closed the Public Hearing at 10:35 p.m. M/S/C (Buydos / Stubblefield). moved to approve Conditioner Use Permit 3-04 as with the five following changes: • Approve but design to be reviewed by staff for final approval • Change in location • Poles use the same manufacturer • Hours of operation change from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. ▪ Condition No. 19 - (Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a parcel map shall be recorded creating a separate site for the clustered wireless telecommunication facility.) Amend Condition No. 19 with an ordinance amendment to be done that would allow wireless and residential use on a single lot five acres or larger. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydcs Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 5.8 Conditional Use Permit 4-05 / Ratify Planning Commission's CUP 4- 05 based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval for the establishment of a 95,734 sq ft shopping center located on the NE corner of State Street and Ramona Expressway / Applicant: San Jacinto Town Center / Community Development Director There were no public comments. M/SIC (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved the approve Conditional Use Permit 4-05 as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 5.9 Bus Ticket Home Program / Request to donate $500 to Valley Restart Shelter Inc toward the Bus Ticket Home Program / Approve (if approved appropriate $500 from General Fund to Non -Departmental Fund) or Disapprove request / City Manager There were no public comments. City Council Action Minutes May 19, 2005 Paoe 12 of 15 MIS/C (Ayres / Stubblefield), moved the approve [tern 5.S as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, B1:ydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 5.10 Ordinance No. 05-20 / An Ordinance amendin•3 Chapter 5.3'2 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code regarding under grounding of overhead utilities / Approve introduction and first reading of Ordinance No. 05- 20 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City of San Jacinto Amending Certain Sections of Chapter 15.32 Utility Installations of the San Jacinto Municipal Code f City Attorney There were no public comments. MIS/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve Ordinance No. 05-20 as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 5.11 Conditional Use Permit 15-04 I Ratify Planning Commission's CUP 15-04 (different from 5.3 — different project) based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval, allowing the construction of a 118,210 square foot shopping center, zoned C-2 located on the northeast corner of Sanderson Avenue and Esplanade Avenue / Applicant: San Jacinto Retail Center LLC — Steve Delson / Community Development Director There were no public comments. M/S/C (Stubblefield / Ayres) moved to approve Conditional Use Permit 15-04 as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None City Council Action Minutes May 19, 2005 Page 13of15 5.12 Conditional Use Permit 9-04 / Ratify Planning Commission's CUP 9- 04 based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval, allowing; the construction of 272 unit townhouse complex consisting of 68 residential buildings located on the N side of Seventh Street between Lyon Avenue, and State Street /. Applicant: CC&D — Chad Covington 1 Community Development Director There were no public comments. M/S/C (Buydos / Shaw) moved to refer back to the Planning Commission and to bring back a map; and for Planning Commission to expedite. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubbefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 5.13 Request for a new Standing Committee to make recommendations regarding the naming of public facilities / Select/City Manager There were no public comments. M/S/C (Buydos / Stubblefield) moved to appoint Council Members Ritchie and Ayres to the standing committee to make recommendations For naming of public facilities. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 5.14 Street trees and sidewalks / Direct staff regarding sidewalks meandering for street trees / City Manager There were no public comments. M/S/C (Ayres / Ritchie) moved to cut the tree at the Estudillo Mansion and replace sidewalk and plant two more trees. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None Mayor Buydos recessed the Regular Meeting to consider the Redevelopment Agency Agenda at 11:37 p.m. and reconvened the Regular Meeting at 11:38 p.m. City Council Action Minutes May 19, 2005 Page 14 of 15 MAYOR f COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS f DISCUSSIONS 6.1 Committee and Agency Agenda 1 Receive and Fiie 1 Ccty Clark 6.2 Reports Consensus for Public Safety Committee rneetinc June 2,2005 rt :g0 p.rr. 6.3 Proposed Joint Meeting with the City of Hemet - July 5, 2005, 7:00 pm / Requested by the City of Hemet Council agreed to set date. Mayor Buydos recessed the Regular Meeting at 11:40 p.m. and reopened in Closed Session at 1 1i :52 p.m. 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9: Three (3) or more cases No reportable action. 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: APNs 437-045-009, 437-045-010 Agency negotiators: Peter A. Cosentini, City Manager and Jeffrey S. Ballinger, City Attorney Negotiating parties: Thanh Le Tung & Tuyet Hong Nguyen Under negotiation: Price and Terms No reportable action. 7.3 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford & Peter Cosentini Employee Organization: Management Association No reportable action. 7.4 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford & Peter Cosentini 8. ADJ it City Council Action Minutes May 19, 2005 Page 15 of 15 Employee Organization: Service Employees international Union, No reportable action. URNMENT With no further coming before the City Council and followed by the Councils acclimation., Mayor Buydos adjourned the meeting at 12:35 p.m. ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk City of San ,,ccinto By Mayor Chris Carlson Buydos Approved as read Approved as amended ACTION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL JUNE 2, 2005, 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order Mayor Buydos called the Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council to order at 7:02 p.m. 1.2 Roll Call Present: Chris Carlson Buydos, Robert Ritchie, Ken Shaw, Dale Stubblefield Absent: Jim Ayres 1.3 Invocation Reverend Bob Sauter, Faith Tabernacle, San Jacinto, gave the invocation. 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance Council Member Ken Shaw led the Pledge of Allegiance Council Member Ayres joined the meeting. 1.5 Special Presentations None 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Jack Warneke, San Jacinto Museum Association, 1183 De Anza Dr. San Jacinto Craig Anthony, 843 Perla Court, San Jacinto 3. CONSENT CALENDAR 3.1 Warrants at 06/02/05 / Approve / Finance Director 3.2 Approve Planned Unit Development (PUD) No. 4-04, a 337 lot single family detached PUD also known as Western Village, and Approve Change of Zone No. 3-04, a Pre -Zone Change from County RA-5 to City R-1 PUD, and a Zone Change from City R-1, W-2 and C-2 to R-1 City Council Action Minutes June 2, 2005 Page 2 of 9 PUD. on 96.8 acres on the north side of Ramona Expressway on both sides of the extension of San Jacinto Avenue: a. Ordinance No. 05-13 / Approve second reading, and Adopt Ordinance No. 05-13 / An Ordinance approving PUFD, No. 4-04 , 337 lot single family detached PUD to be known as Western Village, and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Planned Unit Development (PUD) No. 4-04, a 337 Lot Single Family Detached PUD to be Known as Western Village, Located on 96.8 Acres on the North Side of the Ramona Expressway on Both Sides of the Extension of San Jacinto Avenue / Community Development Director b. Ordinance No. 05-14 f Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 05-14 / An Ordinance approving Zone Change No. 3-04 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto. California Approving Change of Zone 3-04. A Pre -Zone Change from County RA-5 to City R-1 PUD, and From City R-1, W-2 and C-2 to R-1 PUD, on Property located Generally North of the Ramona Expressway on Both sides of the Extension of San Jacinto Avenue / Community Development Director 3.3 Approve Ordinance No. 05-16, An Ordinance approving Pre -Zone Change No. 7-04, a change of zone from City Pre -Zone R-1 to City Pre -Zone R-2, and Ordinance No. 05-17 approving Development Plan No. 10-04 for a development to be known as Foothill Ranch, a 192 lot detached single-family development to be located on 48.86 acres between Alessandro Avenue and Vernon Street, north of Cypress Avenue a. Ordinance No. 05-16 / Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 05-16 / An Ordinance approving Pre -Zone Change No. 7-04 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Change of Zone 7-04, A Pre -Zone Change from City R-1 to City R-2, on Property Located between Alessandro Avenue and Vernon Street, North of Cypress Avenue / Community Development Director b. Ordinance No. 05-17 / Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 05-17 / An Ordinance approving Development Plan 10-04 and by further motion read by title only: City Council Action Minutes June 2, 2005 Page 3 of 9 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Development Plan Nc. 13-04 A Development Plan for a 192 unit detached single fasr y subdivision to be located between Alessandro Avenue and Vernon Street, north of Cypress Avenue 1 Community Development Director 3.4 Ordinance No. 05-18 / Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 05-18 / An Ordinance providing for the adoption of a revised development impact fee schedule: and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of California, Providin+i for the Adoption of a Revised Development Impact Fee Schedule Establishing and Increasing Certain Development Impact Fees for Applicants for Development / City Manager and City Attorney 3.5 Ordinance No. 05-19 / Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 05-19 / An Ordinance approving the Planning Commission's PUD 1-04 based on the planning Commission's Conditions of Approval and by further motion read by title only: " An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto; California, Approving Planned Unit Development 1-04, a 44 unit single family residential development located on the south side of Ramona Boulevard and west of Tiger Lane / Community Development Director 3.6 Ordinance No. 05-20 / Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance amending Chapter 15.32 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code regarding undergrounding of overhead utilities and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City of San Jacinto Amending Certain Sections of Chapter 15.32 Utility Installations of the San Jacinto Municipal Code / City Attorney 3.7 Appropriation of $29,000 from Undesignated, Unreserved General Fund Reserves to provide landscape architectural services to prepare plans and specifications for improvements to Mistletoe Park and the addition of amenities to other City parks from the State Park Grant Money / Approve / Interim Pubic Works Director 3.8 Ramona Music Association Banner on Main Street / Approve display from mid -June to end of July 2005 / Community Development City Council Action Minutes June 2, 2005 Page 4of9 Director Ordinance No. 05-21 / Approve introduction and first reading; of Ordinance 05-21 to amend Section 9.12.050 Subdivision C of the San Jacinto Municipal Code and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City of San Jacinto, California, amending Section 9.12.050, Subdivision C, concerning removal of graffiti / City Attorney 3.10 Final Tract Map 31246 — CNN Homes IV. LTD / Approve and Authorize Mayor to execute Final Map; Authorize City Manager to execute the subdivision agreement and Authorize City Clerk to release final map for recordation / City Engineer 3.11 Final Tract Map 30942 — Meritage Homes / Approve and Authorize Mayor to execute Final Map; Authorize City Manager to execute the subdivision agreement and Authorize City Clerk to release final map for recordation / City Engineer 3.12 Job Description and Salary Range for General Accounting Manager / Approve Job Description for General Accounting Manager and Approve Salary Range M-67 ($4,894.00 - $5,949.00 per month) / Finance Director 3.13 Accept Irrevocable Offer of Dedication from Village Park Properties, LLC for the future realignment of Sanderson .venue and Irrevocable Offer to Dedicate utility easement for sewer line within Tract 30943 / City Engineer 3.14 Appropriation of $6,000 from Undesignated, Unreserved General Fund Reserves to Implement a One -Day Neighborhood Clean -Up Program / Approve 1 Chief Alm 3.15 Authorize Staff to enter into Professional Service Agreement with Applied Earthworks, Inc., in the amount of $24,541.00, plus $2,500 contingency for preparation of a Historic Structures Report for the Francisco Estudillo Heritage Park and Mansion Restoration Site, and Appropriation of an additional $7,041.00 from the Undesignated Unreserved Park Development Fund / Approve / Redevelopment Operations Manager 3.16 Approve and Adopt Resolution No. 2752/ A Resolution of Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments for Lighting, Landscaping, Park District No. 2 (LLPD No. 2) and Annual Assessments for FY 2005-2006, and Accept the Engineer's Report and Giving Notice of and Setting the Time and Place of the Hearing on the Levy of the Proposed Assessment related to City Council Action Minutes June 2, 2005 Page 5 of Maintenance of Public Improvements in the City of Sari Jacinto Lighting, Landscaping Park District No. 2 (LLPD No. 2 for the FY 2005-05 Property Tax Roil / Finance Director Agenda Items 3.9 and 3.14 were pulled. M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve the bale as of tie consent calendar as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 Ordinance No. 05-22 / Approve introduction and first reading of an Ordinance approving Zone Change No. 9-04, changing the zone designation from Multi Family (R-3) and Downtown Residential (D-R) to Downtown Commercial (DC) for the northeast corner of Main Street and Jordan Avenue (1.03 acres) and by further motion read by title only; and Approve and Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration with De Mmimis Finding / Community Development Director An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Change of Zone 9-04, Re -Zoning certain Real Properties located at the Northeast Corner of Main Street and Jordan Avenue from Multi Family (R-3) and Downtown Residential (D-R) to Downtown Commercial (DC) Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 7:11 p.m. Dr. Gupta, Applicant, 341 E. Main St., San Jacinto Alan Chamberlain, 1520 S. San Jacinto, San Jacinto Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 7:14 p.m. M/S/C (Ayres / Shaw) move to approve Ordinance No. 05-22 as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None City Council Action Mlinutee June 2, 2005 Page 6 of 9 5. CiTY DEPARTMENTS 5.1 Resolution No. 2753 / A Resolution approving comprehensive landscape guidelines for the City of San Jacinto / Approve and Adopt / Community Development Director There were no public comments. M/S/C (Ayres / Shaw) move to approve Resolution No. 2753 as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 5.2 Budget Hearing Fiscal Year 2005-2006 / Review and Direct Staff for Final Adoption on June 16. 2005 / Finance Director and City Manager This Item heard after Item 5.5. 5.3 Senl.r Liaison Part -Time Position / Review report and Direct Staff / City Manager M/S/C ( uydos/ Ayres) move to approve with direction to add a job description. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 5.4 Stockpile Use / Consider Options for Stockpile Use and Direct staff / City Manager/City Attorney Public Comments: Frank Webb, 40960 California Oaks, Rd. Ste 242, Murrieta M/S/C (Buydos / Ayres) moved to approve temporary use permit for Shea Homes to allow 45 days to get development agreement completed. Condition for off-peak hours violations contact to be City Hall. Future money from stock pile agreements conditioned on size and length of project with some money being held for administration, but the larger portion for street repairs. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None City Council Action Minutes June 2, 2005 Page 7of3 Abstain: None Absent: None Mayor Buydcs opened ties meeting of the Redevelopment Agency at f:59 p.m. 5.5 Selection of AEI CASC to Prepare the Development of a Specific Plan and Economic Research Associates to Prepare an Economic Development/Market Plan for the Ramona Expressway/San•ierson Avenue Corridor / Approve agreement between AEI CASC and City of San Jacinto and Economic Research Associates and City of San Jacinto / Authorize City Manager to Execute said agreements / City Manager ! Community Development Director Public Comments: Steve Siagter, San Jacinto Land, LLC, 6605 Abbottswood Row, La Jolla MIS/C (Buydos / Ayres) move to approve a 30-day continuance allowing time for consultant to meet with stakeholders. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None Mayor Buydos recessed the Redevelopment Agency at 8:24. 5.2 Budget Hearing Fiscal Year 2005-2006 / Review and Direct Staff for Final Adoption on June 16, 2005 / Finance Director and City Manager Direction given. No formal action taken. 3.9 Ordinance No. 05-21 / Approve introduction and first reading of Ordinance 05-21 to amend Section 9.12.050 Subdivision C of the San Jacinto Municipal Code and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City of San Jacinto, California, amending Section 9.12.050, Subdivision C, concerning removal of graffiti / City Attorney Randy record, spoke on Item 3.9, 890 N. Lyon Ave., San Jacinto M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None City Council Action Minutes June 2, 2005 Page 8of9 3.14 Appropriation of $6,000 from lindesignated, Unreserved General Fund Reserves to implement a One -Day Neighborhood Cleave -Up Program / Approve / Chief Alm MIS(C (Shaw / Buydos) moved to approve as preserntsd and directed City Manager to take from RDA General Fund, if more appropriate. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 6. MAYOR ( COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS (DISCUSSIONS 6.1 Designate location of interim City Ball (Next to City Hall or 5th & Sheriff) so staff can proceed with design. (No Staff Report) MIS/ C (Buydos f Ritchie) designate the location of the interim City Hall. Mction carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie. Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None Mayor Buydos closed the regular meeting at 10:05 and reconvened in closed session at 10:16 p.m. 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9: Three (3) or more cases No reportable action. 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford & Peter Cosentini Employee Organization: Management Association No reportable action. 7.3 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford & Peter Cosentini City Council Action Minutes June 2, 2005 Page 9 of 9 Employee Organization: Service EmployeesInternational Union No reportable action 8. ADJOURNMENT With no further business corning before the. Council, Mayor Buydos adjourned the meeting at 11:05 p.m. ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk City of San Jacinto By Chris Carlson Buydos, Mayor Approved Approve as amended ACTION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JAC%TO CM' Y COUfr cli< JUNE 16, 2005, 7:06 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order Vice Mayor Stubblefield called the Regular meeting of the San Jacinto City Council to order at 7:01 p.m. 1.2 Roli Call Present: Jim Ayres, Robert Ritchie, Ken Shaw, Gafe Stubblefield Absent: Chris Carlson Buydos 1.3 Invocation Reverend Bob Sauter, Faith Tabernacle, San Jacinto, Gave the invocation. 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance Council Member Jim Ayres led the Pledge of Allegiance 1.5 Special Presentations 1.5.1 Business Spotlight of the Month / Economic Development Specialist Randy Williams Accepting for AMC Boarding for Dogs and Cats is Dr. Bruce Jones. 1.5.2 Inclusionary Housing Presentation by Rosenow Spevacek Group This item was continued to an undetermined meeting date. 1.5.3 (Not Agendized) Eagle Scout Presentation. Vice Mayor Stubblefield presented a proclamation to Eagle Scout Dennis James Carlos II. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: City Council Action Minutes June 16, 2005 Page 2 of 10 None CONSENT CALENDAR 3.1 Warrants at 06/16/05 / Approve II Finance Director 3.2 Ordinance No. 05-21 / Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance 05-21 to amend Section 9.12.050 Subdivision C of the San Jacinto Municipal Code and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City of San Jacinto, California,, amending Section 9.12.050; Subdivision C, concerning removal of graffiti / City Attorney 3.3 Ordinance No. 05-22 / Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance approving Zone Change No. 9-04, changing the zone designation from Multi Family (R-3) and Downtown Residential (D-R) to Downtown Commercial (DC) for the northeast corner of Main Street and Jordan Avenue (1.03 acres) and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Change of Zone 9-04, Re -zoning Certain real properties located at Northeast corner of Main Street and Jordan Avenue from Multi -family Residential (R-3) and Downtown Residential (D-R) to Downtown Commercial (D-C) / Community Development Director 3.4 Ratification of CUP 1-05 in association with Tentative Tract Map 33053 / Approve Conditional Use Permit 1-05 based on the Findings of Fact and the modified Conditions of Approval / Community Development Director 3.5 Resolution No. 2754 / A Resolution approving certain Joint Community Facilities Agreements between the City and the San Jacinto Unified School District / Approve and Authorize City Manager to execute same / City Attorney 3.6 Resolution No. 2755 / A Resolution declaring the City's intention to levy and collect assessments within Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1 (LLPD No. 1) for Fiscal Year 2005-2006, giving notice of and setting the time and place of the hearing on the levy of proposed assessment / Approve and Adopt / Finance Director 3.7 Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 (LLPD No. 2) Annexation No. 42 — San Jacinto Oaks LLC — T24052 / City Attorney } City Council Action: Minutes June 16, 2005 Page 3 of 10 Resolution No. _ / A Resolution initiating proceedings for the Annexation of property into LLPD No 2 — Annexation N'o. 42/ Approve and Adopt b) Resolution No. / A Resolution approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 42 into LLPD No. 2 / Approve and, Adopt c) "esolution No. _ / A Resolution declaring intention to annex propery into LLPD No. 2 — Annexation No. 42 / Approve and Adopt d) Public i-learing / At the conclusion of the public hearing if the City determines that a majority protest does not exist, by motion Approve the certification of the election results for adding certain property into LLPD No 2 known as Annexation No. 42 / Approve and Adopt Resolution No. / A Resolution ordering annexation of territory into LLPD No. 2 and levying assessment - Annexation No. 42 — San Jacinto Oaks LLC 3.8 Ramona Boulevard Sewer Construction — 20 hour work day 1 Approve EMWD's contractor to work a 20► hour day, six days a week during the construction of the ;"amona Blvd sewer from Sanderson Avenue to Potter Road ./ City Engineer 3.9 Appropriate $13,000 from the lJndesignated, Unreserved Water Services Fund Reserves for consulting services to prepare the mandated Urban Water Management Plan / interim Public Works Director 3.10 Appropriate an amount not to exceed $37,500.00 for environmental documents with David Evans & Associates for the preparation of construction of Fire State 2 and authorize City Manager to execute agreement / Community Development Director Agenda Item 3.7 was moved to Public Hearing. M1S/C (Ayres/Shaw) moved to approve the balance of the consent calendar as presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Buydos City Council Action Minutes June 16, 2005 Page 4 of 10 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 Planning Commission's Conditional Use Permit 14-04 and Change of Zone and Variance 3-05 / Applicant Michael Mead — Abbacy [folding Corp., 361-C Railroad Canyon Road, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 / Ratify / Community Development Director a. Approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration b. Ordinance No. 05-23 / Approve Introduction and first reading of Ordinance 05-23 and my further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California approving Change of Zone 11-04, Re -Zoning certain real properties located on the east side of Santa Fe Avenue approximately 600 feet north of Esplanade Avenue from Two -Family Residential (R-2) to Light Manufacturing (10-1) Vice Mayor Stubblefield opened the Public Hearing at 7:15 p.. Ariel L. Valli, Valli Architectura Group/Abbacy Holding Corp, 81 Colombia #200., Aliso Viejo City Clerk Chouinard reported no written comments were received. Vice Mayor Stubblefield closed the Public Hearing at 7:17 p.m. MIS/C (Ayres / Ritchie) moved to approve Item 4.1 as presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Buydos 4.2 Planning Commission's Zone Change 1-05 / Applicant: Herron & Rumansoff Architects, 530 St. Johns Place, Hemet, CA 92543 / Ratify /Community Development Director a. Approve the Negative Declaration with DeMinimus Finding b. Ordinance No. 05-24 / Approve introduction and first reading of Ordinance 05-24 and my further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California approving Change of Zone 1-05, Re -Zoning certain real properties located on the south side of Seventh City Council Action Minutes June 16, 2005 Page 5 of 10 Street between Santa Fe Avenue and Railroad Avenue Vice Mayor Stubblefield opened the Public Hearing at 7:24 p.m. Russell Rumansoff, Herron and Rumansoff, 530 St, John's Place, Hemet City Clerk Chouinard reported no written comments were received. Vice Mayor Stubblefield closed the Public Hearing at 7:25 p.m. MISIC (Ayres/Shaw) moved to approve items a and b as presented. Motion carried 3/0. Ayes: Ayres, Shaw, Stubblefield Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Ritchie, Buydos 4.3 Planning Commission's Conditional Use Permit 13-04 and Zone Change 10-04 / Applicant: Donald R. Thayer, P Box 1196, Nuevo, CA 92567 / Ratify / Community Development Director a. Approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration with De Minimus Finding b. Ordinance No. 05-25 / Approve introduction and first reading of Ordinance 05-25 and my further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California approving Change of Zone 10-04, Re -Zoning certain real properties located at the northeast corner of State Street and Seventh Street from Neighborhood of Santa Fe Avenue approximately 600 feet north of Esplanade Avenue from Two -Family Residential (R-2) to Light Manufacturing (M-1) Vice Mayor Stubblefield opened the Public Hearing at 7:29 p.m. Russell Rumansoff, Herron and Rumansoff, 530 St. John's Place, Hemet Joy Thayer, Small Animal Care Center, 438 S. State Street, San Jacinto City Clerk Chouinard reported no written comments were received. Vice Mayor Stubblefield closed the Public Hearing at 7:31 p.m. MISIC (Ayres / Ritchie) moved to approve items a and b as presented. Motion carried 4/0. City Council Action Minutes June 16, 200E Page 6 of 10 Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Buydcs 4.4 Resolution No. 2756 1 A resolution confirming a diactrarn and assessment and levying the assessment for Landscaping. Lighting, Park District No. 2 (LLPD #2) FY 2005-2006 l Approve and Adopt Finance Director and NES District Consultant Vice Mayor Stubblefield opened the Public Hearing at 7:37 p.m. No one was present to support or oppose Resolution No. 2756. City Clerk Chouinard reported no written comments were received and cerified the election, noting the majority is in favor of the annexation and assessment, Vice Mayor Stubblefield closed the Public Hearing at 7:38 p.m. MIS/C (Ayres / Shaw) moved to approve and adopt Resolution No. 2756 as presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Buydos 4.5 (Formerly 3.7) Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 (LLPD No. 2) Annexation No. 42 — San Jacinto Oaks LLC — T24052 / City Attorney a) Resolution No. 2757 / A Resolution initiating proceedings for the Annexation of property into LLPD No 2 — Annexation No. 42/ Approve and Adopt b) Resolution No. 2758 / A Resolution approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 42 into LLPD No. 2 / Approve and Adopt c) Resolution No. 2759 / A Resolution declaring intention to annex property into LLPD No. 2 — Annexation No. 42 / Approve and Adopt M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve and adopt Resolution Nos. 2757, 2758, and 2759 as presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Buydos City Council Action Minutes June 16: 2005 Pace 7 of le d) Public Bearing 1 At the conciusion of the public hearing if Thie City determines that a majority protest does not exist, lay motion Approve the certification of the elect »n results for addiina certain property into LLPD No 2 known as Annexation No. 42 / Approve and Adopt Resolution No. 2760 I A Resolution ordering annexation of territory into LLPD No. 2 and levying assessment - Annexation No. 42 — San Jacinto Oaks LLC Vice Mayor Stubblefield opened the Public Hearing at 7:39 p.m. No one was present to support or oppose Resolution No. 2760. City Clerk Chouinard reported no written comments were received and certified the election, noting the majority is in favor of the annexation and assessment, Vice Mayor Stubblefield closed the Public Hearing at 7:40 p.m. M/S/C (Ayres / Ritchie) moved to approve and adopt Resolution No. 2760 as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Buydos 5. MTV DEPARTMENTS 5.1 Budget Fiscal Year 2005-2006 / Resolution No. / A l".esoiution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Adopting the Budget for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 / Approve and Adopt including arty new recommendations / City Manager & Finance Director / M/S/C (Ayres / Ritchie) moved to approve staff recommendation of the 10 items including two POP Police Officers. Code Enforcement officers stay funded out of CDBG. Senior Liaison funding and job description to be brought back at a later date. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Buydos Issues- Expenditures Est. Cost Staff Recommendation 1 Skyview Park Drainage Project 028-7100-410-4001 32,886 Keep in Budget; Revise Project Description to include road improvements. 2 Lighted Street Signs- Various main 40,000 Add to budget; project funding to come City Council Action Minutes June 16, 2005 Paae 8 of 10 arteries 024-4150-410-400 1 from Traffic Safety Fund. 3 Police POP Program (1 CSO,2 Officers, 1 Office Asst) xx-3 100-431-3405 471.14E Contingent funding for based on ASEN funds awarded. Partial funding from CFD 2003-1 and from SchoolVSCPP grant. No funding recommended for POP CSC and CA. 4 Replace two FT Temp Code Enforcement positions funded by CDBG into two permanent FTE positions. 029-xxxx-xxx-3090 010-xxxx-xxx-3090 120,000 Review at midyear for possible funding. If outside of CDBG funding, then General Fund cost of $ 120,000 annually. If within CDBG area only, then a cost reduction but would' require an FTE commitment. 6 1 Senior Liaison Position 20,000 Develop further details and review at midyear. 7 Fee Study Update 010-1700-417-3090 Video Camera Equipment -Downtown 010-3100-431-4045 f <10,000> 10,000 Reduce Planning line item and reallocate funding to purchase video camera equipment for Downtown. 8 Water Sewer Master List Project 'A Water Fund $15,000 'A Sewer Fund $15,000 050-9000-414-1004 055-4170-450-1004 30,000 Reappropriate current year project funds not expected to be completed in FY 2004-05 not included in FY 2005-06 budget. 9 Park Murals Unknown Review at a later date after review by Public Works. 10 Mistletoe Park — Project -$243,600 Druding Park — Project-$2,000 Hoffman Park — Project-$6,500 Sagecrest Park — Project-$4,500 Sallee Park — Project-$35,000 S kyvi ew Park—Project$1,400 28-7100-410-4001 293,000 Add to FY 2005-06 budget; Funded by 2002 State Park Bond Act City Council Action Minutes June 16, 2005 Page 9 of 10 July 5, 2Od5 Joint Meeting with tlrte City of Hemet / Approve Agenda City Manager M1SIC (Ayres / Ritchie) moved to approve Agenda (items with tE e City of Hemet: Highway 79, Regional Homeless Shelter Joint Committee, aria ground water issues. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie. Shaw, Stubblefield Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Buydos 5.3 San Jacinto Levee Project — request direction from Council regarding formation of Community Facilities District (CFD) r` City Engineer Public Comments: Daniel Goodwin, 21024 State Street, San Jacinto Bruce Scott, F.O. Box 369, San Jacinto M/SFC (Ayres f Ritchie) moved to approve Engineer's Report. Mallon carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Buydos 5.4 Discussion item per Council Member Ritchie / New Saab -Committee for City of San Jacinto and City of Hemet issues / Direct Staff This item was pulled. Vice Mayor Stubblefield recessed the regular meeting to consider the Redevelopment Agency Agenda at 9:00 p.m. and reconvened the Regular Meeting at 9:02 p.m. 6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS 6.1 Committee / Agency Reports 1 Receive and File / City Cleric Council members gave their reports. Vice Mayor Stubblefield recessed the regular meeting at 9:07 p.m. Council Member Ayres was away from the dais. Vice Mayor Stubblefield reconvened in Closed Session at 9:17 p.m. City Council Action Minutes June 16,2005 Page 10 of 10 CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WiT[- LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated" representatives: Roger Crawford & Peter Cosentini Employee Organization: Management Assoc€adorn No reportable action. 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford & Peter Cosentini Employee Organization: Service Employees international Union No reportable action. 7.3 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: City Manager No reportable action. 8. ADJOURNMENT With no further business before the City Council, Vice Mayor Stubblefield adjourned the Regular Meeting of the City Council at 10:00 p.m. City of San Jacinto Dale Stubblefield, Vice Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk ACTION MINUTES SEGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL JI `'LY 7, 2005, 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order Mayor Buydos called the Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council to order at 7:02 p.m. 1.2 .Roll Cali Present: Wm Ayres, Chris Carlson Buydos, Robert Ritchie, Ken Shaw: Dale Stubblefield Absent: None 1.3 Invocation Reverend Bob Sauter, Faith Tabernacle, San Jacinto, gave the invocation. 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance Council Member Shaw led the Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Buydos recessed the regular meeting at 7:06 p.m. and went into the Special Meeting Closed Session. The Council came out of dosed session at 7:14 p.m. City Attorney John Brown reported out that by unanimous consensus, the City Council has announced that they will be terminating the employee agreement with City Manager Peter Cosentini. Mayor Buydos closed the Special Meeting at 7:16 p.m. and reconvened the regular meeting. 1.5 Special Presentations 1.5.1 Ramona Mobility Group / presented by Marion Ashley, Chairman Riverside County Board of Supervisors 1.5.2 Mid County Parkway (proposed link between San Jacinto and Corona) / Riverside County Transportation Commission City Council Action Minutes July 7, 2005 Page 2 of 10 (RCTC) / Selection of preferred alignment by Council 1.5.3 iraciusionary Housing Presentation by Rcsenow Spevracek Group, Cathy Bechtel (Division Head of Planning — RCTC), Deputy Executive Director Hideo Sugita, and Rick Simon consultant with CH©MHill gave presentation. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Andy Ramirez, 1255 Faithful Way, San Jacinto Jim Potts, representing Reposo St, Homeowners, 534 Reposo St.. San Jacinto 3. CONSENT CALEN'R-AR 3.1 Warrants at 07/07/05 / Approve / Finance Director 3.2 Planning Commission's Conditional Use Permit 14-04 and Change of Zone and Variance 3-05 / Applicant Michael Mead Abbacy Holding Corp., 351-C Railroad Carryon Road, Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 1 Community Development Director Ordinance No. 05-23 / Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance 05-23 and my further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California approving Change of Zone 11-04, Re -Zoning certain real properties located on the east side of Santa Fe Avenue approximately 600 feet north of Esplanade Avenue from Two -Family Residential (R-2) to Light Manufacturing (M-1) 3.3 Planning Commission's Zone Change 1-05 / Applicant: Herron & Rumansoff Architects, 530 St. Johns Place, Hemet, CA 92543 ! Community Development Director Ordinance No. 05-24 ! Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance 05-24 and my further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California approving Change of Zone 1-05, Re -Zoning certain real properties located on the south side of Seventh Street between Railroad Avenue and Santa Fe Avenue from Two -Family Residential — PUD (R-2-PUD) and Agriculture (A) to Light Manufacturing (M-1) City Council Action Minutes July 7, 2005 Page 3 of 10 Planning Commission's Conditional Use Permit 13-04 and Zone Change 10-041 Applicant: Donald R. Thayer, P Box 1196, Nuevo, CA 92567 / Ratify / Community, Development Director Ordinance No. 05-25 / Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance 05-25 and my further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto. California approving Change of Zone 10-04, Re -Zoning certain real properties located at the northeast corner of State Street and Seventh Street from Neighborhood Commercial to General Commercial 3.5 Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of Right of Way T31294 / Receive and accept Grant Deed / City Engineer Ramona Expressway and Eagle Road Traffic Signal and Intersection Improvements (Project Nos 05-117 and 06-127) a) Award Public Works Contract to DBX Incorporated in the sum of $280,190.00 plus 15% contingency for Ramona Expressway / Eagle Road Traffic Signalization and Intersection Improvements lc) Appropriate an additional $14,719.00 from the City's Traffic Signalization fund to offset construction contingency c) Authorize Mayor to execute the public works contract with DBX, Incorporated d) Direct City Clerk to reject all other bids received 3.7 IBM AS400 Hardware / Approve upgrade purchase for Finance Department / Finance Director 3.8 Resolution No. _ / A Resolution creating a new job description and salary range for a Senior Liaison position / Approve and Adopt / Assistant to the City Manager 3.9 Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of Right of Way from James E Franz along north side of Park Avenue and East of Hewitt Street (accommodates traffic signal installed by Osborne Development associated the development of Sunrise at Park Hill Tract 29917) / Accept / City Engineer 3.10 Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of Right of Way from San Jacinto Valley Academy Inc for drainage and sewer maintenance easement along the north side of San Jacinto Valley Academy located at 480 N San Jacinto Ave (improvements in conjunction of T31035) / Accept / City Engineer City_ Council Action Minutes July 7, 2005 Page 4 of 10 3.11 Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of Right -of -Way from San Jacinto Unified School District for additional right of way improvements installed SJUSD along Shaver Street (in cor4woction w th the development of Jose Ant nIo EstudiNiia EIere erttary Scfmc.c) Accept / City Engineer 3,12 Final Tract Map 33106 — CNH Homes 1V LTD /City Engineer a) Approve Final Tract Map for recordation. b) Authorize Mayor to execute the Final Map;. c) Authorize the City Manger to execute the subdivision agreement, and d1 Authorize the City Clerk to release the final map for recordation Purple Pipe Proposal / Approve and appropriate $5,000 from the Sewer Enterprise Fund to pay for proposal (develop a plan for distribution of recycled water) / City Manager 3.14 Resolution No. 27621 a Resolution declaring the City of San Jacinto to be a Water Wise City / Approve / Interim Public Works Director 3.15 fessionai Services Agreement with Joni E. Goodman, Washington Consultant / Approve / City Manager 3.16 Family Service Association of Western Riverside County Lease Agreement— One year lease of Community Center as a Senior Nutrition Site / Approve / Assistant to the City Manager 3.17 Annual League of California Cities Conference October 5 - 8, 2005 / Approve attendance of City Manager / City Manager 3.18 City Hall Seismic Evaluation / Appropriate $8,000 from the General Fund to pay for seismic evaluation of 201 E Main Street / Approve / City Manager 3.19 Reimbursement Agreement for Right of Way Acquisition / Approve and authorize Mayor to execute Reimbursement Agreement between City of San Jacinto and Lennar Homes of California, Inc. / City Attorney & City Engineer 3.20 Resolution No. 2763 / A resolution approving design guidelines for single family residential development in the City of San Jacinto / Approve and Adopt / Community Development Director Agenda Items 3.6, 3.8, 3.15, 3.17 and 3.18 were pulled. These items will be heard at the end of `5. City Departments." City Council .Action Minutes July 7, 2005 Page 5 of 10 M/SIC (Ayres / Shaw) roved to approve tt a .alance of the Consent, Calendar as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres. Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 4. PUBLIC TEARING 4.1 Public Hearing 1 Resolution No. 2764 I A esolution confirming a diagram and assessment and levying the Assessment for Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1 (LLPD No. 1) for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 / Approve / Finance Director & Assessment Engineer Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearinc at 8:05 p.rn. No one was present to support oroppose Resolution No. 2764. City Clerk Chouinard reported no written comments were received. Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 8:06 p.m. MIMIC (Ayres / Shaw) moved to approve and adopt Resolution No. 2764 as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 4.2 Zone Change 3-05 and Tentative Tract 33509 to facilitate a residential development of 36 single-family lots and 1 detention basin lot located north of Esplanade Avenue between Mountain Avenue and Ramona Expressway / Community Development Director a) Approve Mitigated Negative Declaration with De Minimus Finding b) Approve introduction and first reading of Ordinance No. 05-26 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California approving Change of zone 3-05, re -zoning certain real properties located north of Esplanade Avenue between Mountain Avenue and Ramona Expressway from Commercial to R-1 (Single Family Residential) c) Approve and Adopt Resolution No. 2765 / A Resolution approving Tentative Tract Map No 33509, a 36 residential lot subdivision, located north of Esplanade Avenue between Mountain Avenue and Ramona Expressway City Council Action Minutes July 7, 2005 Page 6 of 10 Alayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 8:06 p.m. Frank Gorman, GW. Engineering; 800 E. Flo!lda, Ste 201, Hemet City Cierk Chouinard reported no written comments were received. Major Stubblefield closed the Public Hearing at 8:08 p.rr. M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve Resolution No. 2765 as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 5. CITY DEPARTMENTS 5.1 Naming of San Jacinto's second fire station / Select name 1 Council`s Facility Naming Subcommittee and City Manager M/SIC (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to nacre the new fire station "West San Jacinto". Raul call vote. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None Vice Mayor Stubblefield directed staff to have a plaque made with the name on it. Mayor Buydos opened the Redevelopment Agency meeting at 8:24 p.m. 5.2 Selection of AEI CASC to prepare the development of a Specific Plan and Economic Research Associates to prepare an Economic Development/Market Plan for the Ramona Expressway / Sanderson Avenue corridor / Approve and authorize City Manager to execute the agreements / Consultant Mary Lanier ® Mike Record, 920 W. Ramona Expressway, San Jacinto ® Steve Slagter, San Jacinto Land LLC, La Jolla ® Ben Parry, Century American Development / RC Hobbs, 1 110 E. Chapman Avenue, Orange • Eric Flodine/Forma, representing The Shelban Co., 124 LaBoca, San Jacinto City Council Action Minutes July 7, 2005 Page 7 of 10 • Daniel E. Powell, representing Village Park Properties, LLC az Ramona Business Park, LLC, 12250 El Camino Real, Se 300, San Dieoo • Eric Fiodine, representino Forma, S..1. Land LLC, 5. E. Citrus Ave #208, Redlands M/S/C (Buydos I Ayres) moved to approve cap of $77,000 with the modification for an outreach plan to stakeholders and bi-weekly reports back to Council. *Motion carried 5/0. M/S1C (Buydos I Ayres) moved to amend the first motion that the completion of the plan is not to exceed four months. Second Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefieid, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None " First motion: Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefieid, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None Mayor Buydos recessed the meeting at 9:06 p.m. and reconvened at 9:24 p.m. Mayor Buydos reconvened at 9:24 p.m. This item heard out of order. 3.6 Ramona Expressway and Eagle Road Traffic Signal and Intersection Improvements (Project No's 05-117 and 06-127) A) Award Public Works Contract to DBX Incorporated in the sum of $280,190.00 plus 15% contingency for Ramona Expressway / Eagle Road Traffic Signalization and Intersection improvements e) Appropriate an additional $14,719.00 from the City's Traffic Signalization fund to offset construction contingency f) Authorize Mayor to execute the public works contract with DBX, incorporated Direct City Clerk to reject all other bids received Council Members Ayres and Stubblefield away from the dais. Council Member Stubblefield returned at 9:25 p.m. City Council Action Minutes July 7, 2005 Page 8of10 M/S/C (Ritchie / Buydos) moved to approve with the lighted pedestrian crossing equipment. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, BuyCos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Ayres 5.3 Conditional Use Permit 4-09 / ' atify Planning Commission's recommendation based on the Findings of Fact and the modified Conditions of Approval / Community Development Director Public comments: Pam Meyer, representing applicant, spoke M/S/C (Stubblefield / uydos) moved to approve with the allowance of 8-foot back wall and will allow 8-foot block wall along flood channel. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Ayres 3.8 esolution No. _ / A Resolution creating] a new Fob description and salary range for a Senior Liaison position / Approve and Adopt / Assistant to the City Manager Council Member Ayres returned to the dais. Unanimous consensus to bring item back. 3.15 Professional Services Agreement with Joni B. Goodman, Washington Consultant / Approve / City Manager M/S/C (Ayres / Buydos) moved to approve with an RFP (request for proposal) for lobbyist services be brought to Council within three months. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None 3.17 Annual League of California Cities Conference October 5 - 8, 2005 / Approve attendance of City Manager / City Manager City Council Action Minutes July 7, 2005 Page 9of10 No action taken. s.Th C2ty EaC[ Seismic Evaluation f Appropriate :ON from the General Fund to pay for seismic eva:Euatien oE Mein Street / Approve / City Manager M/S/C (Ayres / Buydos} moved to approve as presented. Motio carried Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield. Euydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: None Council Member Buydos recessed the regular r; ieetn Agency Agenda at 9:44 p.n. consider the Redevelopment ent Council Member Buydos reconvened the regular meeting and close: the regular meeting to reconvene in closed session at 9:46 p.rn. 6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEM"=,ER REPORTS. / DISCUSSIONS Council Members gave their reports. 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LETEGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (C) of Section 54956.9: one (1) potential case No reportable action. 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford & Peter Cosentini Employee Organization: Management Association No reportable action. 7.2 CONFERENCE WITFI LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford & Peter Cosentini Employee Organization: Service Employees International Union No reportable action. 7.3 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford City Council Action Minutes July 7, 2005 Page 10 of 10 Employee Organization: City Manager No reportable action. 8. ADJOURNMENT With no further business before the City Council, Mayor Buydos recessed the Regular Meeting at 11:20 p.m. ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk City of San Jacinto by Chris Carlson Buydos, Mayor Approved as read Approved as amended ACTION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL DULY 21, 2005. 7:30 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Rocm 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue. San Jacinto, California ORGANIZATION 1. 1 Call to Order Mayor Buydos called the Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council to order at 7:00 p.m. 1.2 Roll Call Present: Chris Carlson Buydos: Robert Ritchie, Ken Shaw Absent: Jim Ayres, Dale Stubblefield 1.3 Invocation Reverend Bob Sauter, Faith Tabernacle, San Jacinto, gave the invocation 1.4 Pledge of Aliegia: ce Mayor Buydos led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1.5 Special Presentations 1.5.1 American Red Cross 1 Sandy Lowry, Development Officer, Riverside County Chapter This item was rescheduled until August 4th 2005. 1.5.2 Park Master Plan presentation / RHA Landscape Architects Planners Inc Todd Bagley gave the presentation. 1.5.3 Eastern Municipal Water District's San Jacinto Valley Interceptor Sewer Project, Phase 1 / Jeff D. Wall M/S/C (Buydos / Ritchie) motion to agendize item to accommodate request for extension of comment period. Motion carried 3/0. Ayes: Ritchie, Shaw, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None City Council Action Minutes July 21, 2005 Peoe 2 of 7 Absent: Ayres, Stubblefield I�mrt[ west Mosquito and Vector Control District f Direct staff! Dr. Major S Dhillort, Diet -lot Manager 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Michael Fred Allen spoke CONSENT CALEN I AR 3.1 Warrants at 07/21/05 / Approve / Finance Director 3.2 July 13, 2005 Special Meeting Minutes / Approve' City Clerk 3.3 Treasurer's Report at April 30, 2005 / Receive and File / Finance Director 3.4 Zone Change 3-05 and Tentative Tract 33509 to facilitate a residential development of 36 single-family lots and 1 detention basin lot located north of Esplanade Avenue between Mountain Avenue and Ramona Expressway / Community Development Director a) Approve second reading and adopt Ordnance No. 05-26 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California approving Change of zone 3-05, re- zoning certain real properties located north of Esplanade Avenue between Mountain Avenue and Ramona Expressway from Commercial to R-1 (Single Family Residential) 3.5 California Asset Management Trust / Review CAMP application and authorize execution of application / City Treasurer and Finance Director 3.6 Estudillo Mansion Tree Trimming / Appropriate $4,500 to be utilized for tree trimming at the Mansion's grounds / Redevelopment Operations Manager 3.7 Purchase and installation of two (2) banner poles and two (2) decorative street lights / Approve and Appropriate $20,000 from the Undesignated, Unreserved Balance in the General Fund / Interim Public Works Director City Council Action Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 3 of 7 3.8 Final Tract Map 24738 and Final Tract Map 24738-3 Bond Release — Forecast Homes,, A.K. Hovnanian Company / Apprcve and Authorize Public Works Department to start the maintenance of activities associated with this project f City Engineer ASA Server and related hardware / Approve and Appropriate $10,000 from Undesignated, Unreserved General Fund Balance to allow outside e-mail iirewall I Finance Director 3.10 Diamond Valley Arts Council's grant request,' Apprcve250 grant / Co incil Member Shaw 3, 1 Deposit Agreement between the City of San Jacinto and Meritage Homes of California Inc — Final Map No. 30942 / Approve and authorize City Manager to execute said agreement / City Attorney and City Engineer 3.12 Resolution No. 2766 / A Resolution amending procedures and requirements for the consideration of Development Agreements under Government Code Sections 65864 through 65869.5 inclusive / Approve and Adopt/City Attorney Items 3.6 and 3.7 were pulled. M/SIC (Shaw / Ritchie) moved to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried 3/0. Ayes: Ritchie, Shaw, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Ayres, Stubblefield 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 (LLPD No. 2) Annexation No. 43 (Temecula Valley LLC T30603) / City Attorney a) Resolution No. _ / A Resolution initiating proceedings for the Annexation of property into LLPD No 2 — Annexation No. 43 / Approve and Adopt b) Resolution No._ / A Resolution approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 43 in to LLPD No. 2 / Approve and Adopt c) Resolution No. _ I A Resolution declaring intention to annex property into LLPD No. 2 — Annexation No. 43 / Approve and City Council Action Minutes July 21, 200E Paqe 4 of 7 Adopt d) Public Hearing / At the conclusion of the public hearing if the City determines that a majority protest does not exist, by motion approve the certification of the election results for adding certain property into LLPD No 2 known as Annexation No. 43 I Approve and Adopt Resolution No. / A Resolution ordering annexation of territory into LLPD No. 2 and levying assessment - Annexation No. 43 — T30603 Unanimous consensus to continue Item 4.1 until August 4, 2005. 4.2 Ordinance No. 05-28 / An Ordinance approving a development agreement by and between the City of San Jacinto and Shea Homes Approve introduction and first reading and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City council of the City of San Jacinto, California Approving a Development Agreement by and Between the City of San Jacinto and Shea Homes / City Attorney Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 8:34 p.m. No one was present to support or oppose Ordinance No. 05-28. Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 8:35 p.m. MIS1C (Buydos / Ritchie) moved to approve with previous recommendations; and understanding prior recommendation for road repair less administrative costs and staff to monitor for violations. Motion carried 3/0. Ayes: Ritchie, Shaw, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Ayres, Stubblefield Agendized earlier in meeting from 1.5.3 Eastern Municipal Water District's San Jacinto Valley Interceptor Sewer Project, Phase 1 / Jeff D. Wall ***** New aaendized M/S/C (Buydos / Shaw) moved to leave comment period open until July 27, 2005. Community Director Hults suggested a fifteen (15) day extension. Council unanimously concurred. Motion carried 3.0 Ayes Ritchie, Shaw, Buydos Nays: None MISIC City Council Action Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 5 of 7 Absent: Ayres, Stubblefield Abstain: None CITY DEPARTMENTS 5.1 Purchase of City Street Light System bey Southern CaEiforn a Ed scn Discussion and direct staff I Acting City Manager urydos r Shaw) moved to direct staff to meet with Southern California Edison representatives to sell City street light system to SCE. Motion carried 3/0. Ayes: Ritchie, Shaw, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Ayres, Stubblefield Resolution No. 2767 1 City Investment Policy 1 Review - Approve and Adopt / Finance Director M/S/C (Buydos / Shaw) moved to approve and adopt Resolution No. 2767 as presented. Motion carried 3/0. Ayes: Ritchie, Shaw, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Ayres, Stubblefield 5.3 Camera monitoring system on Main Street 1 Approve and appropriate $23,699.75 from the General Fund / Chief of Police Council consensus to reschedule item. 5.4 Non-compliance with San Jacinto Municipal Code regarding commercial vehicles parking with city limits / Approve standardizing commercial vehicle enforcement strategy with progressive levels of enforcement actions taken against repeat violators / Chief of Police Council consensus to refer this item back to the Public Safety Committee. 3.6 Estudillo Mansion Tree Trimming / Appropriate $4,500 to be utilized for tree trimming at the Mansion's grounds / Redevelopment Operations Manager M/SIC (Buydos / Ritchie) moved to direct staff to get another bid, not to exceed $4,500 and give to lowest bidder. Motion carried 3/0. Ayes: Ritchie, Shaw, Buydos City Council Action Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 6 of 7 Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Ayres, Stubblefield Purchase: and installation of two (2) banner poles and two (2 decorative street lights / Approve and Appropriate $20,003 from the Undesignated, Unreserved Balance in the Genera! Fund / interim Public Works Director MIS/C ( uydos / Ritchie) moved to approve as presented. Motion carried 3/0. Ayes: Ritchie, Shaw, Buydos Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Ayres, Stubblefield Mayor Buydcs recessed the regu'iar meeting tc consider the Redevelopment Agency Agenda at 9:53 p.m. Mayor Buydos reconvened the regular meeting and opened the Specia. Meeting at 9:56 p.m. No activity taken. Mayor Buydos closed the Special Meeting at 9:57. 6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS I DISCUSSIONS 6.1 Committee and/or Agency Agendas / Receive and File / City Clerk Council Members gave their reports. Mayor Buydos recessed the regular meeting and reconvened in Closed Session at 9:59 p.m. 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (C) of Section 54956.9: one (I) potential case No reportable action. 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Service Employees International Union No reportable action. City Counci! Action Minutes July 21, 2005 Page 7 of 7 7.3 CONFERENCE WT1 LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Management Association No reportable action. 8. ADJOURNMENT With no further business before the City Council: Mayor Buydos adjourned the regular meeting at 10:40 p.m. ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk City of San Jacinto By Chris Carlson Buydos Approved as read Approved as amended ACTION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JA,UNTO Ctre COUNC[L. AUGUST 4, 2005, 7:00 p.rn. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order Mayor Chris Buydos called the Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council to order at 7:01 p.m. 1.2 Roil Cali Present: Chris Carson Buydos, Roben. Ritchie, Ken Shaw. Dale Stubblefield Absent: Jim Ayres 1.3 Invocation Reverend Bob Sauter, Faith Tabernacle, gave the invocation. 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance Vice Mayor Dale Stubblefield led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1.5 Special Presentations 1.5.1 American Red Cross / Sandy Lowry, Development Officer, Riverside County Chapter 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mr. Rey Navarro, Durango Homes resident, spoke 3. CONSENT CALENDAR 3.1 Warrants at 08/04/65 / Approve / Finance Director 3.2 April 25, 2003 Special Meeting Minutes / Approve City Clerk City Council Action Minutes August 4, 2005 Paoe 2 of 8 3.3 Ordinance No. 05-28 / Art Ordinance approving a development agreement by and between the City of San Jacinto and Shea Homes Approve second reading and Adopt and by, further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City council of the City of San Jacinto, California Approving a Development Agreement by and Between the City of San Jacinto and Shea Homes / City Attorney 3.4 Professional Space Planner / Appropriate $10,000 for professional space planner from Undesignated, Unreserved General Fund valance (322 E Main Street) / Finance Director 3.5 Traffic Calming improvements — 1200 and 1300 block of Reinhart Court (T24054) / Approve speed humps /` City Engineer 3.6 Final Tract Map 30481 — Empire Homes SJ 137 LP / Approve 1) Final Tract Map 30481 for recordation 2) Authorize Mayor to execute the Final Map 3) Authorize City Manager to execute the subdivision agreement and 4) Authorize the City Clerk to release the final map for recordation upon annexation in the City 's LLPD No. 2 City Engineer 3.7 San Jacinto Valley interceptor Sewer Project — Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration 1 Receive and File / Acting City Manager Items 3.1 and 3.4 were pulled. Item 3.2 and 3.3 were amended. These items will be heard at the end of '5. City Departments. M/S/C (Buydos / Shaw) moved to approve the balance of the consent calendar as presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Jim Ayres 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2 (LLPD No. 2) Annexation No. 43 (Temecula Valley LLC T30603) / City Attorney a) Resolution No. 2768 / A Resolution initiating proceedings for the Annexation of property into LLPD No 2 — Annexation No. 43 / Approve and Adopt itv Council Action Minutes August 4,2005 Pace 3 of 8 b) Resolution No. 2769 / A Resolution approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 43 in tc: LLPD. Ne. 2 / Approve and Adopt c) Resolution No. 2770 / A Resolution declaring intention to annex property into LLPD No. 2 — Annexation No. 4s / Approve and Adopt d) Public Hearing f At the conclusion of the public hearing if the City determines that a majority protest does not exist, by motion approve the certification of the election results for adding certain property into LLPD No 2 known as Annexation No. 43 / Approve and Adopt Resolution No. 2771 I A Resolution ordering annexation of territory into LLPD No. 2 and levying assessment - Annexation No. 43 — T30603 Council Member Robert Ritchie away from the d M/S/C (Shaw / Buydos) moved to approve and adopt Resolution Nos. 2768, 2769 and 2770 as presented. Motion carried /0. Ayes: Ayres, Shaw, Stubblefield Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Jim Ayres, Robert Ritchie Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 7:23 p.m. No one was present to support or oppose Resolution Nos. 2771. City Clerk Chouinard reported no written comments were received and certified the election, noting the majority is in favor of the annexation and assessment, Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 7:24 p.m. For the record it was noted that there was a name change from Metro Valley to Lennar. M/S/C (Stubblefield / Buydos) moved to approve and adopt Resolution No. 2771 As presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Jim Ayres City Council Action Minutes August 4, 2005 Page 4of8 4.2 Resolution No. 2772 / A Resolution certifying the results of an election and adding property (Lennar Homes Tract 30603) to Community Facilities District Ne. 20fi3-1 (CFD 2003-11 Annexation Na. 16 I Approve and Adopt 1 Special Tax Consultant and City Attorney Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 7:25 p.rn. No one was present to support or oppose Resolution No. 2772. City Clerk Chouinard reported no written comments were received and certified the election, noting the majority is in favor of the annexation and assessment, Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 7:26 p.rn. MIS/C (Shaw f Stubbiefield) moved to approve Resolution No. 2772 as presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Jim Ayres 4.3 Interim Ordinance No. 05-31 / An Ordinance regarding high density residential land use projects f Approve and Adopt (4/5 vote required to pass) and by further motion read by title only: An interim Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto Imposing Temporary Regulations Limiting the Development of High Density Residential Land Use Projects / Community Development Director and City Attorney Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 7:33 p.m. Scott Garrett, The Garrett Group, 1 Betterworld Circle, Temecula Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing 7:35 p.m. M/S/C (Buydos / Shaw) moved to approve as presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Jim Ayres 4.4 General Plan Amendment 2-05, zone Change 2-05 and Tentative Tract 32555 to facilitate a residential development of 12 single family lots located adjacent to Skyview Park between Ramona Boulevard and Ramona Expressway / Applicant: Invermex, Inc, 15572 Gale Avenue, Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 / Community Development Director City Council Action Minutes August 4;2005 Pane 5 of 8 a) Approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration with De Minimus Finding b) Approve and Adopt Resoiuticn No. 2773 I A reseiuticn e amend the City's General Plan map c) Approve introduction and first reading of Crdinance No. 25-29 amending the City's Zoning Map and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California approving Change of Zone 2-05, re -zoning certain real properties located between Ramona Expressway and Ramona Boulevard from Commercial to R-1 (One Family Residential) d) Approve and Adopt Resolution No. 2774 / A resolution approving Tentative Tract 32555 based upon Planning Commission's recommendation Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 7:45 p.m. Public comments: Oscar Montez, representing developer, 1353 Limonite St., Hemet Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 7:46 p.m. MIS/C (Stubblefield / Shaw) moved to approve with lots not to exceed 20,000 sq. ft. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Jim Ayres 4.5 Ordinance 05-30 / An Ordinance amending the San Jacinto Municipal Code concerning the use of streets for storage of vehicles / Approve introduction and first reading and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City of San Jacinto, California, Adding Section 10.16.130 Subdivision (C) and (D) of the San Jacinto Municipal Code Concerning Use of Streets for Storage of Vehicles / Chief of Police and City Attorney City Council Action Minutes August4, 2005 Page 6 of 8 Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 7:53 p.rn. Mr, Rey Navarro spoke again. Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 7:a5 p.m. MiS/C (Stubblefield / Ritchie) moved to approve Ordinance 05-30 as presented. presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Jim es CITY DEPARTMENTS 5.1 West San Jacinto (Fire Station) update presented by STK Council directed staff to compose a weekly report to keep them up dated on the project. 5.2 League of California Cities Annual Meeting October 8, 2005 E Select one voting delegate and one alternate 1 City Clerk Unanimous consensus for Council Member Jim Ayres to attend the League of California Cities Annual Meeting and for Vice Mayor Stubblefield to act as alternate. 5.3 Interim City Manager ! City Council discussion and if appropriate take action regarding the appointment of Interim City Manager This item was tabled until after closed session. 3.1 Warrants at 08/04/05 / Approve / Finance Director M/S1C (Stubblefield / Shaw) moved to approve as presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Jim Ayres City Council Action Minutes August 4, 2005 Page 7of€ 3.,4 Professional Space Ptariraerf Appropriate $16,000 fo,r° professional space planner from Jr designated, Unreserved Genera[ Fund Balance (222 E Main Street:) / Finance Director M/S./C (Stubblefield / Ritchie) moved to approve anct. appropriate 1;.609 as presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie; Shale, Stubblefield Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Jim Ayres Manor Buydos recessed the regular meeting to consider e RedeveAgency Agenda at 3:22 p.m. Buydos reconvened_the regular meeting at 8:23 p.m. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS Courcii Members gave their reports. Mayor Buydos recessed the regular meeting and convened in closed session at 5:30 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (C) of Section 54956.9: one (1) potential case No reportable action. 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION Subdivision (a) of Section 54956.9 Name of Case: RIC428483 No reportable action. 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Service Employees International Union No reportable action. City Council Action Minutes August 4, 2005 Page 8 of 8 7.3 CONFERENCE MTH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Management Association No reportable action, 7.4 PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT Title: Interim City Manager Report out Council authorized negotiation of employment acreement with Barry McClellan as interim City Manacer. City Attorney John Brown reported: By unanimous consensus the City Council has agreed to settling the case between EMVJD versus the City of San Jacinto and Eddie Hassan. 8. ADJOURNMENT With no further business before the City Council, Mayor Buydos recessed the Regular Meeting at 9:42 p.m. ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk City of San Jacinto by Chris Carlson Buydos, Mayor Approved as read Approved as amended ACTION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACI TO CITY COUGNCL AUGUST 16, 2005, 7:00 p.m San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California ORGANIZATION .1 Call to Order Mayor Carlson Euyos caned the Re Council to order at 7:00 p.m. Roll Call r!g ct e San Fresent: Jim Ayres, Chris Carlson Buydos, Ken Shaw, Dale Stubblefield Absent: Robert Ritchie 1.3 invocation Reverend Bob Sauter, Faith Tabernacle, gave the invocation. 1.4 fledge of Allegiance Council Member Jim Ayres led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1,5 Special Presentations 1.5.1 Ramona Bowl / Janine Mundwyier 1.5,2 Business Spotlight of the Month / Economic Development Specialist Randy Williams presenting to Rebel Rents. Doug Fleury, Marketing Manager, accepting. This item taken out of order heard prior to 1.5.1. 1.5.3 Recognition of Del Kroker and Gwen Schlick, outgoing members of the Estudillo Mansion Committee This item postponed until September 1, 2005. 1.5.4 Recognition of Ken Cope, former Planning Commissioner This item postponed until September 1, 2005. City Council Action Minutes August 18, 2005 Page 2of7 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: William Sterling, spoke Mr. Navarro, spoke 3. CONSENT CALENDAR 3.1 Warrants at 08/04/05 / Approve / Finance Director 3.2 April 25, 2003 Special Meeting Minutes r Approve / City Clerk 3.3 Treasurer's Report at May 31, 2005 / Receive and Filet Finance Director 3.4 Treasurer's Report at June 30, 2005 / Receive and File / Finance Director 3.5 General Pan Amendment 2-05, Zone Change 2-05 and Tentative Tract 32555 to facilitate a residential development of 12 single family lots located adjacent to Skyview Park between Ramona Boulevard and Ramona Expressway / Applicant: Invermez, Inc, 15572 Gale Avenue, Hacienda Heights. CA 91745 / Community Development Director Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 05-29 amending the City's Zoning Map and by further motion read l..y title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California approving Change of Zone 2-05, re -zoning certain real properties located between Ramona Expressway and Ramona Boulevard from Commercial to R-1 (One Family Residential) 3.6 Final Tract Map 24047-1 / Bond Release George Wimpey Inc — A Delaware Corporation dba Morrison Homes / Approve entire release of Subdivision Bond No. 209260 in the amount of $581,015.25 for Tract 249047-1 and notify Seaboard Surety Company 3.7 Ordinance 05-30 / An Ordinance amending the San Jacinto Municipal Code concerning the use of streets for storage of vehicles / Appr•}ve second reading and Adopt Ordinance 05-30 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City of San Jacinto, California, Adding Section 10.16.130 Subdivision (C) and (D) of the San Jacinto Municipal Code Concerning Use of Streets for Storage of 3.8 City Council Action Minutes August 18, 2005 Page 3 of 7 Vehicles / Chief of Pence and City Attorney Resolution No. 2777 I A Resolution, updating authorized signers on the Automated Clearing House Agreement between the City and Bank of Hemet / Approve and Adopt I Finance Director 3.9 Resolution No. 2778 / A Resolution approving a Senior Liaison Position with job description and salary range / Approve and Adopt / Assistant to the City Manager Resolution No. 2779 / A Resolution of the City of San Jacinto and San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency adopting Rules and Regulations for implementation of the California Relocation Assistance Law and Real Property Acquisition Guidelines / Approve and Adopt / Redevelopment Operations Manager 3.11 Notice of Completion regarding 2305 Pavement Rehabilitation for Project Nos. 32-016, 05-102, 05-107, 05-108, and 05-120 / Approve and authorize release of retention in the amount of $134,612.68 thirty (30) days after recordation of the Notice of Completion / City Engineer 3.12 Traffic calming improvements at The Villas — T22950 / Approve and authorize the installation of speed humps in The Viiias — T22950 / City Engineer 3.13 Resolution No. 2780 / A Resolution authorizing the City of San Jacinto to enter into contracts authorizing the Grant of License for Cable placement with American Legion Post 848 and Main Street Realty / Approve and Adopt / Finance Director 3.14 Resolution No. 2781 / A Resolution naming authorized persons to conduct business and transactions with LAIF ( Local Agency investment Fund) / Approve and Adopt / Finance Director 3.15 Resolution No. 2782 / A Resolution revising authorized signers with Bank of Hemet / Approve and Adopt / Finance Director 3.16 Resolution No. 2783 / A Resolution to update authorized officers for online banking agreement with Bank of Hemet / Approve and Adopt / Finance Director 3.17 Resolution No. 2784 / A Resolution authorizing signers and facsimile signatures per an agreement with Bank of Hemet / Approve and Adopt / Finance Director Item 3.2 was pulled. City Council Action Minutes August 18, 2005 Page 4 of 7 MISIC (Shaw / Stubblefield) moved to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carved 4/0. Nays: Absent: Abstain: 4. PUBLIC HEARING None scheduled Ayres, Shaw, None Ritchie None 5. CITY DEPARTMENTS Stubblefield, Carlson Buydos 5.1 Estudillo Mansion Committee Appointments f Appoint two committee members with terms expiring August 2009 f City Clerk There were no Public Comments. M/S/C (Shaw 1 Buyolos) moved to approve and add Carol Romeril and Nick Jones to Estudillo Mansion Committee to adiust the full board membership to seven members. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Nays: Absent: Abstain: Ayres, Shaw, Stubblefield, Carlson Buydos None Ritchie None 5.2 Tuls Annexation Status Report / Direct Staff 1 Contract Planner There were no Public Comments No action taken. 5.3 Commercial Vehicle Parking Violation / Approve implementation of a standardized commercial vehicle enforcement strategy with progressive levels of enforcement actions for repeat violators 1 Chief of Police Council Member Ritchie joined the meeting at 7:54 p.m. M/S/C (Stubblefield / Buydos) moved to approve non -boot options with escalading fines to be the maximum allowable by law. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Carlson Buydos City Council Action Minutes August 18, 2005 Page 5 of 7 Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.4 322 Main Street monthly lease, ongoing building expenses and services, and equipment rental / Approve and Appropriate $57,7 ,0 in funds for FY 2005-06 from Undesignated, Unreserved General Fund Balance / Finance Director M/S/C (Buydos / Stubblefield) motion made under Item 5.5. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield Carson Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.5 322 Main Street / Approve and Appropriate funds necessary from Water, Fund Sewer Fund, Refuse Fund and General Fund Balances to move furniture,, equipment, technology, purchase equipment and to make necessary tenant improvements for Finance Department's relocation to 322 rain Street / Finance Director M/S/C (Buydos / Stubblefield) moved to approve and appropriate monies except to pull the fencing item from 5.4. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Carlson Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.6 interim City Manager / City Council discussion and if appropriate take action regarding the appointment of Interim City Manager MIS/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to appoint Barry McClellan for interim City Manager and City Attorney to negotiate contract. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Stubblefield, Carlson Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None Mayor Buydos recessed the regular meeting to consider the Redevelopment Agency Agenda at 8:19 p.m. and reconvened the Regular Meeting at 8:20 p.m. City Council Action Minutes August 18, 2005 Page 6 of 7 6. MAYOR 1 COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS f DISCUSSIONS 6.1 Committee and Agency Agendas I Receive and File F City Clerk Council Members gave their reports. Mayor Buydos recessed the reaufar meeting at 8:25 p.m. and recoriver red ire closed session at 8:35 p.m. 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 LIABILITY CLAIMS Claimant: Jeffery Penn Agency claimed against: City of San Jacinto Claimant: Steven Colletti Agency claimed against: City of San Jacinto No reportable action. 7.2 PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT Title: Interim City Manager No reportable action. 7.3 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (C) •f Section 54956.9: one (1) potential case No reportable action. 7.4 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Service Employees International Union No reportable action. 7.5 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Management Association No reportable action. City Council Action Minutes August 18, 2005 Page 7 of 7 8. ADJOURNMENT With no futher business coming before the Councii, Vice Mayor F.-Aubbiefieid adjourned the meeting at 10:00 p.rn. ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk Lt.y n Jacinto by Chris Carisdn Euydcs, Mayor Approved as read Approved as amended ACTION MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 1, 200)5, 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacintc, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order Mayor Chris Carlson Buydcs called the Regular MeetingMeetng of the San Jacinto City Council to order at 7:02 p.m. 1.2 RollCa Present Jim Ayres, Chris Carlson Buycics, Robert Ritchi, Ken Shaw, Dale Stubblefield Absent: None 1.3 Invocation Rev. Bob Sauter gave the invocation. 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance Council Member Shaw led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1.5 Special Presentations 1.5.1 Recognition of Ken Cope, former Planning Commissioner Mayor Buydos thanked Mr. Cope on behalf of the Council and the City. She then presented him with a plaque. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Michael Sarabia, Nana Lenes Mexican Restaurant, (owner of the Mexican Restaurant at Seventh Street and San Jacinto Avenue) Nancy Maich, First 5 Riverside, 2002 Iowa Avenue, Suite 100, Riverside 3. CONSENT CALENDAR 3.1 Warrants at 09/01/05 / Approve / Finance Director City Council Action Minutes September 1, 2005 Page 2 of 5 3.2 April 25, 2003 Special Meeting Minutes / Approve / City Clerk 3.3 Final Tract Map 31154 — Young California San Jacinto LP (Young California Homes): 1) Approve Final Tract Map 31154 for recordation; 2) Authorize Mayor to execute the map 3) Authorize City Manager to execute the subdivision agreement; and 4) Authorize the City Clerk to release the final map for recordation 3.4 Final Tract Map 31384-1 — San Jacinto Homes 91 LLC (Distinguished Homes): 1) Approve Final Tract Map 31384-1 for recordation; 2) Authorize Mayor to execute the map 3) Authorize City Manager to execute the subdivision agreement; and 4) Authorize the City Clerk to release the final map for recordation 3.5 Letter of Support ; Approve and Authorize Mayor to execute letter of support for Western Riverside County Agricultural Coalition (WRCAC) Dairy Prop 50 Grant for Grant Application "Integrated Regional Dairy Management Plan for the San Jacinto Watershed with Pilot Demonstration Technologies" 3.6 Hemet -San Jacinto Jaycees Banner — 59th Miss Hemet ! Miss San Jacinto Scholarship Pageant Authorize banner over City right of way frm mid- September to September 33, 2005 / Community Development Director Items 3.1 and 3.2 were pulled; Item 3.1 will be heard at the end of "5. City Departments and 3.2 will be brought back at a later date.) MIS/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 Resolution No. 2785 / A Resolution of the City Council approving the addition of a condition to previously approved tentative tract Map No. 32376, a 337 lot residential subdivision for the Western Village PUD to be located on the north side of the Ramona Expressway on both sides of the extension of San Jacinto Avenue / Applicant: Silverstone Development Company Inc / Approve and Adopt / Community Development Director Council Member Ayres noted the applicant was not present. City Council Action [minutes September 1, 2005 Page 3of5 Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 7:25 p. There was no one present to support or oppose the proposal. Mayor closed the Public Hearing at 7:25:10. M/S/C (Ayres / Shawl moved to approve and adopt Resolution No. 255 as presented. Motion carries 5/0, Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubble field; Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 4.2 Appeal of Conditional Use Permit 3-05 (CUP 3-05) / Applicant: Jamul Rahman dba May-J Inc, 670 S State Street, San Jacinto, CA 92583 Approve (uphold) Planning Commission's finding that there is an over concentration of liquor sales in the area / Community development Director Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 7:31 p.m. Dick Evett, El Toro Market, 5905 Winncl ff Drive, Riverside Jeff Rahman, R&B Investments & El Toro Market, 650 S State Street, San Jacinto Robert Sauter, 41335 Rainbow Court, Hemet Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 7:41 p.m. M/S/C (Buydos / Ayres) moved to continue item 4.2 to October 6, 2005. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5. CITY DEPARTMENTS 5.1 Park Master Plan Presentation / Update / Todd Bagley RHA Landscape No action taken. City Council Action Minutes September 1, 2005 Page 4of5 5.2 Video cameras 1 Approve and Appropriate the expenditures of $23,699.75 frorn the General Fund to install a camera monitoring system on Main Street f Chief of Police No action taken. 5.3 Security fencing at 322 E Main Street, San Jacinto / Approve and Appropriate $9,000 from FY 2005-2006 from multiple funds/ Finance Director Council concurred to obtain recommendation from Space Needs Subcommittee on issue. Mayor Buydos recessed the Regular Meeting to consider the Redevelopment Agency meeting at 9:19 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:19:50 p.m. 6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS Council Members gave their reports. 7. CLOSED SESSI }N 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956. Property: APNs 437-045-009, 437-045-010 Agency Negotiators: Barry McClelland, Interim City Manager and representative from the City Attorney's Office Negotiating Parties: Le Tung Thanh / Nguyen Tuyet Hong T. Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment No action taken. 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (C) of Section 54956.9: one (1) potential case No action taken. 7.3 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Service Employees International Union No action taken. Cit./ Council Action Minutes September 1, 2005 Page 5 of 5 7.4 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Management Association 7.5 PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT Title: Public Works Director No action taken. 8. ADJOURNMENT With no further business before the City Council, Mayor Buydos adjourned the meeting at 10:24 p.m. ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk City of San Jacinto By Chris Carlson, Buydos Approved as read Approved as amended ACTSON MINUTES RECEJLAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTC CPT`: COUNCIL SEP EMBER 15, 20(15, 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1,1 Cali to Order Mayor Chris Carlson Buydos called the Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council to order at 7: 1 g p.m. 1.2 Roll Call Present: Ayres, Buydcs: Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield Absent: None 1.3 Invocation Rev. Bob Sauter gave the invocation. 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance Interim City Manager Barry McClellan led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1.5 Special Presentations 1.5.1 Recognition of former Estudillo Mansion Committee Members Del Kroker and Gwen Schlick Vice Mayor Stubblefield and Council Member Shaw reviewed the highlights and achievements and presented plaques. 1.5.2 Business Spotlight of the Month / Economic Development Specialist Le Petite Hair Shop was spotlighted for September 2005. Mayor Buydos presented a plaque to the owner. 1.5.3 Interim City Manager Barry McClellan introduced the new Public Works Director Mike Emberton. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None City Council Action Minutes September 15, 2005 Paoe 2 of g CONSENT CALENDAR 3.1 Warrants at 09/15/05 / Approve / Finance Director 3.2 Final Tract Map 30639-1: 1) Approve Final Tract Map 30639-1 for recordation; 2) Authorize Mayor to execute the map 3) Authorize City Manager to execute the subdivision agreement; and 4) Authorize the City Clerk to release the final map for recordation / City Engineer 3.3 Final Tract Map 29341-1, 29341-2, 29341-3, 29341 Bond Releases / Cambridge Homes Inc aka CNH Homes / 1) Approve release of bonds SD0533 ($202,979.75),. SF7774 (6190,354.25) SM0805 ($206,161.25 and SM0938 ($154,636.50) for T29341-1, 29341-2, 29341-3, 29341, respectively / City Engineer 3.4 Final Tract Map 30603 — Lennar Homes of California Inc: 1) Approve Final Tract Map 30603 for recordation; 2) Authorize Mayor to execute the map 3) Authorize City Manager to execute the subdivision agreement; and 4) Authorize the City Clerk to release the final map for recordation 3.5 San Jacinto Valley Cemetery District request for reimbursement for street improvements on Santa Fe venue / Approve and appropriate $17,250 from Capital Project 05-107 Asphalt improvements / City Manager 3.6 Resolution No. 2786 / A Resolution initiating annexation of territory into Assessment District No. 2003-01 for road, street, and highway maintenance — Annexation No. 8 — Monte Carlo Group T32352 / Approve and Adopt / Special Tax Consultant and City Attorney 3.7 Resolution No. 2787 / A Resolution approving the Engineer's Report and setting the Public Hearing for Annexation No. 8 — Monte Carlo Group T32352 for road, street, and highway maintenance - Annexation No. 8 into AD 2003-1 / Approve and Adopt / Special Tax Consultant / City Attorney 3.8 Resolution No. 2788 / A Resolution amending the City of San Jacinto Land Secured Financing Policy concerning use of Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 / Approve and Adopt / City Attorney 3.9 Conditional Use Permit 2-01 / Applicant Joe Bellezza for Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses, 1092 Encanto Drive, San Jacinto, CA 92582 / Ratify Planning Commission's approval reauthorizing CUP 2- 01 based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval for the construction of a 5,000 sq ft church and 78 parking spaces at the City Council Action Minutes September 15, 2005 Page 3 of 9 southwest corner of DeAnza Drive and Palma. Avenue / Community Development Director 3.10 Conditional Use Permit 8-05 / Applicant A,ntonette Sirs for Efcriuse of Praise Ministries, 189 DeAnza Drive, San Jacinto, CA 92583 / Satify Planning Commission's approval based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval expanding use to include K through 12th grade school located at the northeast corner of Grand Army Avenue and DeAnza rive / Community Development Director 3.11 Conditional Use Permit 5-05 i Applicant Harjit Singh — Valero — Shop- n-Go Food Store, 697 South State Street / San Jacinto, CA 92583 / Ratify Planning Commission's approval of CUP 5-05 based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval for the rehabilitation and expansion of the existing convenience store and gas provider to include diesel fuel under a separate canopy / Community Development Director Vehicle Impound Cost Recovery Fee / Approve increase from FY 04/05 amount of $86.50 to $100.00 for FY 05/06 / Chief of Police Model RCTC (Riverside County Transportation Commission) TUMF (Transportation Uniformrr Mitigation Fee) / Approve and Authorize City Manager to execute reimbursement agreements with RCTC for completion of Ramona Expressway Widening and Ramona Expressway Gap Closure TUMF projects / Approve as to form and authorize City Manger to execute any future TUMF reimbursement agreements with RCTC when model agreement is used / City Engineer 3.14 Public Works Director Contract / Approve / City Manager Items 3.5, 3.11, and 3.12 were pulled. Items will be heard at the end of "5. City Departments." M/S/C (Ayres / Shaw) moved to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None City Council Action Minutee September 15, 2005 Page 4of9 PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 Resolution No. 2789 / A Resolution certifying, the results of an election to add property to CFD 2003-1 for police and fire services —. Annexation No. 12 commonly known as Monte Carlo Group 732352 / Approve and Adopt / Special Tax Consultant & City Attorney Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 7:36 p.m. City Clerk Chouinard reported there were no written comments rece \'ed. There was no one present to support or oppose the proposed annexation. City Clerk reported and certified the election that 100% were in favor of the annexation and assessment. Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing a 7:37 p.m. MIS/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve and adopt Resolution No. 2789 annexing and assessing said property. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 4.2 Petition to withdraw from San Jacinto Agricultural Preserve Number 3 / Applicant Ronald and Julie Haringa,, 38980 Record Road, San Jacinto, CA 92583 / Community Development Director Adopt 1) De Minimus impact finding for the withdrawal from San Jacinto Agricultural Preserve Number 3; and 2) A Mitigated Negative Declaration for the withdrawal from San Jacinto Agricultural Preserve Number 3 Resolution No. 2790 / A resolution acknowledging that the withdrawal is consistent with the Williamson Act and approves the tentative withdrawal from San Jacinto Agricultural Preserve No. 3 / Approve and Adopt Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 7:41 p.m. Robert Orrnelles, 1312, 1330, & 1342 Ramona Blvd., San Jacinto Bob Edmonds, 707 Broadway, Suite 808, San Diego Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 7:42 pm. M/S/C (Ayres 1 Stubblefield) moved to approve items #1 and #2; and to approve and adopt Resolution No. 2790 as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None City Council Action Minutes September 15, 2005 Page 5 of 9 Absent: None Abstain: None 4.3 Esplanade Specific Pan — approximately 22E acres witch up to 1045 dwelling units, a 12 acre school site, a 10 acre park, other open space features, mixed use component of neighborhood commercial uses and multi -family units — Tentative Tract No. 32955 !Applicant: AEI-CASC for the McRae Group of Companies .' Community Development Director 1) Approve and Adopt a mitigated Negative Declaration and its associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 2) Approve introduction and first reading of Ordinance No. 05- 2 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the Ciyt of San Jacinto, Cailfornia. Approving Change of Zone 9-02, A Zone Change from R-1, R-1-15,000, R-2, C-2 and A-1 to SP Specific Plan, an Property Located on the North Side of Esplanade Avenue East of Warren Road 3) Resolution No. 2791 f A Resolution approving Specific Plan 01-02, a specific plan to be known as the Esplanade Specific Plan, on 288 acres located on the north side of Esplanade Avenue east of Warren Road / Approve and Aopt 4) Resolution No. 2792 / A Resolution approving Tentative Tract Map No. 32955 for the Esplanade Specific Plan, on 228 acres located on the north side of Esplanade Avenue and East of Warren Road / Approve and Adopt Contract Planner John Freiman presented Staff Report, noting it is an accumulation of long project that has come a long way. The project currently meets General Plan requirements: The Specific Plan has to be consistent. Attorney Sam Alhadeff requested to amend 2.25 because in reality it is number 25 on the engineering conditions. City Engineer Motlagh is agreeable to the change. Contract Planner John Freiman read the requests for amendments from RCTC to be included, too. Council Member Ayres noted there was not any input from the Hemet School District or San Jacinto's. Planner Freiman explained in detail. Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 8:12 p.m. Sam Alhadeff, representing applicant, 41607 Margarita road # 1 03, Temecula City Council fiction Minutes September 15, 2005 Page 6 of 9 Bill Kunzrnan, Traffic Engineer for the project, 1111 Town and Country #34, Orange, CA Tom Evans — applicant reviewed non-traditional items included in the Esplanade Specific Pian Andy Rameriz, Faithhill Way, San Jacinto Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 5:45 p.m. Mayor are we ok with statement of condition, with RCTC & Hwv 79 issue. Habib gives both applicant and ROTC ability to work out. Area 2. Ayres HoA tech managed; if HoA decides to longer maintain; doesn't want City to be on hook. Mayor can be delivered or sold to another provider. Shaw — flip flop park and school. Ritchie add 'l round about or this flip fiop. Mayor asked Habib & Freiman up to podium. What are lesser evils? She sees 3 options. Freiman — flipping ltr from school dist based on this issue. Sch Dist until topography checked. Sch Dist objected strenuously because of low'spot. Habib — avoid fronting homes on collector streets. On Washington rather have backing than fronting but not option for them. Traffic flow and no conflict with drivers. Nothing prohibits add'n of speed humps. Legally — can install entire length. Then would be 25mph. Vest combination determines: width, lenath, if houses front street or not - traffic eng no of homes in 1/4 miles section. Ritchie - ? Vest has to be both — and width and no. of hses fronting street. Mayor? language to be used and will be done with final map design. One condition can be expanded to inci disc tonight. Ayres can we do it without slowing down project? Ritchie — speed humps; as done on Kirby; add'I roundabout; then can say we looked it. Mayor sch dist have to file safe route to school plans. That would address pedestrian flow. Dale thought out of box with mixed use and separate villages. Hears fronting hses on street — it becomes a personal preference. Gave example. Choice is to back onto collector and use turnabouts. Can be fine tuned as developed. Speeders tend to be residents of communities. Reservation about Hemet sch dist putting school in. Potential to be drain. Gave example. Flipping school & park — school won't build because of issue and then would have issue of 60 more homes. Ayres — dummy dots and box dots — residents complain of noise. Doesn't support box dots. Ritchie — when appropriate school crossing situation ? to Habib. Habib reviewed process (ask Habib) Mayor echoed dale comments — components beyond land use. ANS/C (Buydos / Ritchie) moved to approve items 1,2,3 and 4 as presented with the amendment of the two conditions: Engineering Condition(s): 2.25 becomes 25; any reimbursement for offsight improvements Council Action Minutes September 15, 2005 Pace 7of9 along State Street shall be determined by Riverside County Flood; entire Blodgett Road shall be fully improved; Park improvements and Open Space: determines by Plennirta Department and Planning Commission. MotlorE carried 5/0, Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, S aw Stubblefieid,Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 4.4 Deveiopment Agreement 05-04 1 Ordinance No. 05-33 i An Ordinance approving Development Agreement 05-04 for "The Esplanade" Specific Plan / Approve introduction and first reading of Ordinance 05-33 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto.. California, Approving of a Development Agreement between the City. of San Jacinto and Warren & Esplanade LLC and Esplanade & Cawston LLC Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 9:09 p.m. Attorney Sam Alhadeff, representing applicant, 41607 Marcarita Road #103, Temecuia, thanked staff and noted they accept all the conditions. Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 9:10 pm. M/S/C (Ayres / Ritchie) moved to approve introduction and first reading of Ordinance 05-04 as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5. CITY DEPARTMENTS 3.5 San Jacinto Valley Cemetery District request for reimbursement for street improvements on Santa Fe Avenue / Approve and appropriate $17,250 from Capital Project 05-107 Asphalt Improvements / City Manager M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos City Council Action Minutes September 15, 2005 Page 8 of 9 Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None Conditional Use. Permit 5-05 i Applicant Harjit Singh — Valero — Sf uop- n-Go Food Store, 697 South State Street f San Jacinto, CA 92583 Ratify Planning Commission's approval of CUP 5-05 based on the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval for the rehabilitation and expansion of the existing convenience store and as provider to include diesel fuel under a separate canopy r` Community Development Director M/S/C (Ritchie / Shaw) moved to approve as presented. Motiarn cE rigid /1. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buy: Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 3.12 Vehicle Impound Cost Recovery Fee / Approve increase from FY 044/05 amount of $86.50 to $100.00 for FY G5/06 / Chief of Police Moel CTC (Riverside County Transportation Commission) TUMF (Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee) / Approve and Authorize City Manager to execute reimbursement agreements with RCTC for completion of Ramona Expressway Widening and Ramona Expressway Gap Closure TUMF projects / Approve as to form and authorize City Manger to execute any future TUMF reimbursement agreements with RCTC when model agreement is used / City Engineer M/S/C (Ritchie / Shaw) moved to approve as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 6. MANOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS 6.1 Committee and/or Agency Agendas / Receive and File / City Clerk Council Members gave their reports. Mayor Buydos recessed the meeting at 9:30 p.m. to consider the Redevelopment Agency Agenda and reconvened the Council's meeting at 9:31 p.m. City Council Action Minutes September 15, 2005 Page 9 of 9 Mayor Buydos recessed the regular meeting at 9:3 i:30 and reconvene d in Closed Session at 2:42 pm. CLOSED SESSION 7./ CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (CI of Section 54 56.9: one (1) potential case No reportable action. 7.2 C INFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Management Association No reportable action. 8. ADJOURNMENT With no further business before the Council, Mayor Buydos adjourned the meeting at 10:31 p.rn. ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk City of San Jacinto by Chris Carlson Buydos, Mayor Approved as read Approved as amended MUTES REGULAR MEENNG OF THE SAN .1ACiNTO Of-FY COUNCEL NOVEMBER 2005; TM p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San jacinth, California 1. ORGANEZATION 1.1 Oa to Order Mayor Chris Carlson Buydos called the regular meetingmeetng ofthe San Jacinto City Council to order at 7:05 p.m. 1.2 Roll Cali Present: Jim Ayres, Chris Buydos, Robert Ritchie, Ken Shaw, Dale Stubblefield Absent: None 1.3 Invocation Rev. Bob Sauter, Faith Tabernacle, gave the invocation. 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance City Manager Barry IVicClellan led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1.5 Special Presentations Council Member Ritchie commented on the charity boxing event started by former San Jacinto Police Office Jeff Penn. He noted he is currently working in the Sacramento area for Califomia Youth Charities. He read the letter from PAL (Police Activities League). The charity made a donation of $10,000 to PAL with Council Member Ritchie and Maureen Williamson representing PAL accepting. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: 2.1 City Managers Report regarding public comments during October City Manager McClellan reported on the outcome of Michael Fred Allen's complaint about contacting the police department after regular business hours. He then reported on Mr. Holland's request: The homeowners association (from The Estates) does not want the trees removed and noted he will continue to work with him. Regarding Ms Goodbody's issue City Council Minutes November 3, 2005 Page 2 of 18 of the drainage 'water at Park Hill Grid Hewitt: he is working with the deveioper fora proposal of a cross gutter. City I'Mfanaaer lMfcClellan noted that Ms Stevens was informed by the Deputy City Attorney about the condition of the Vosberg and an explanation of how the Wiiliernson .Act works. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR 3.1 Warrants at i E/03/05 1 Approve 1 Finance Director 3.2 Ordinance No. 05-36 1 An Ordinance regarding Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2-04 relating to Ordinance 340, Article 23, Section 70 - Special Events and Municipal Code Section 5 - Business License and Regulations / Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 05-36 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City of San Jacinto, California, amending Ordinance 340 Article 23, Section 70. Special Events and Section 5 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code relating to usiness License and Regulations Community Development Directr•�r 3.3 Ordinance 05-38 - Change of Zone 4-05; TTM 33420 to facilitate a residential development of 200 single-family lots, one retention basin lot, one park lot and one commercial lot located south of Cottonwood Avenue between Cawston Avenue and Sanderson Avenue 1 Community Development Director Approve second reading of Ordinance No. 05-38 approving Change of Zone 4-05 based upon Planning Commission's recommendations and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Approving a Change of Zone of Tract 33420 from General Commercial (C-2) and Two -Family Residential (R-2) to General Commercial (C-2) and Single Family Residential (R-1), located south of Cottonwood Avenue between Cawston Avenue and Sanderson Avenue 3.4 Resolution No. 2815 / A Resolution authorizing a facsimile authorization agreement with the Bank of Hemet / Approve and Adopt / Finance Director 3.5 Resolution No. 2816 / A Resolution to authorize rescinding previous resolution(s) and adopting bank signers with the Bank of Hemet / Approve and Adopt / Finance Director City Council Minutes November 3, 2005 Pace 3of18 Resolution No, 28"17 / A Resc[iution to update the named pers.ons to conduct business and transactions with LAiF / Approve and Adopt 1 Finance Director esolution No. 2818 ' A resolution approving the creation of a new job description and salary ranee for Senior Planner / Approve and Adopt 1 Community Development Director 3.8 Management Unit's salary matrix r Approve and Adopt / Cit Attorney Traffic Safety Fund FY 2005 / Approve spending plan for FY 2005 and Appropriate $76,000 of available Traffic Safety Funds / Chief of Police 3.10 SLESF Grant FY 2005 1 Approve and Authorize spending plan of Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund Grant ! Chief of Police City Manager McClellan pulled 3.8 for a clarification. There are three confidential employees showing the same increase. The new salary survey did not reflect the correct range for one of the employees and consequently corrected. M/S/C (Stubblefield / Buydos) moved to approve the Consent Calendar as presented with correction as noted on item 3.8. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 4, PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 Appeal of Conditional Use Permit 3-65 (CUP 3-05) 1 Applicant: Jamal Rahman dba May-J Inc, 670 S State Street, San Jacinto, CA 92583 / Approve (uphold) Planning Commission's finding that there is an over concentration of liquor sales in the area or Resolution No. 2819 / A Resolution approving a Condition Use Permit for the sate of beer, wine and hard liquor at 670 South State Street — CUP 3-05 / Continued from October 20, 2005 / Community Development Director City Council Minutes November 3, 2005 Page 4 of 18 Community Development Director Tim Hults gave the staff report, noting the itern was continued from the last meeting to bring back with alternative action items. The proposed second resolution is for a different option where conditions have been provided; dedicating area for hard alcohol sales; not more that 25%; locked case access for hard alcohol by staff only; installation of cameras and mirrors; an annual contribution for alcohol awareness program; and limited advertising in the window. Mayor Euydos opened the Public Hearing 8:14 p.m. Dick Evitt, representing Mar-J Inc, Jamal Rahman family, 5935 \N nnciiff Drive, Riverside, CA 92509 commented he contacted ABC and attorneys regarding the designation of size and regulation thereof. Accordingly it has nothing to do with the project at the present time. He recommended approval of the change in liquor license to include hard liquor. Last week the Council wanted a letter of necessity and convenience: They have informal memo it is not required and therefore, not formally in writing. Council Member Shaw questioned Mr, Evitt if single cans being sold was to be included in the Class 21 license. Mr. Evitt responded affirmatively that is the request. Jamal Rahman, owner El Toro Market, 670 S. State Street, San Jacinto, commented that the sale of single cans of beer has been in this location for some time. He commented he would appreciate it if the condition to not have sale of single cans put on as a condition. 2) Security cameras inside and outside are not a problem. 3) He noted that liquor sales do not exceed 5%-10% of other items. (4) Mr. Rahman further noted the El Toro meat department is larger than the local Staters. 4) (5) El Toro doesn't advertise alcohol in newspapers, as do many other liquor license holders. (6) Putting the hard liquor behind the cash register is not a problem and in that regular customers don't have access. 4) Regarding the over concentration — they already have a beer and wine license and they are merely asking for an upgrade to include hard alcohol. They are not adding an additional license to the area. The nearest liquor license is 1.5 or 2 miles away. He then respectively asked Council to approve the upgraded license. He noted that every person has the right to purchase alcohol, it is their choice. Council Member Ayres asked if he had reviewed the conditions, as single can sale is prohibited as a condition (#7). Mr. Rahman noted he hadn't seen the Conditions of Approval. He has the privilege now and doesn't want it taken away. Other license holders have it. There are no parks, no schools, no neighborhood complaints to support denying single can sales. The neighbors were informed and they have not responded, irv'h single can sales. City Council Minutes November 3, 2005 Page 5 of 18 oh they would h-ave if they were opposed to Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 7:23 pm. Mayor Buydos asked City Attorney John Brown regarding the letter dated November 3rd. It is better to be processed thrcuch the City as a CUP and therefore, can be conditioned; if it is chosen tc deny request by direr:trig staff to do appropriate resolution for denial, Vice Mayor Stubblefield questioned if Council Member Ritchie had had time to contact ABC per his request at the fast meetino. Council Member Ritchie responded that he had. Vice Mayor Stubblefield continued that he noted that size went from 3,500 to 9,000 so ft and it is a separate section of the store. He spoke to Jafar Rahman and he assured iltim the area would be secured. He reviewed the infrastructure and security and concluded that at the end of the day, he doesn't believe it is fair to say one can and one can't. Vice Mayor Stubblefield questioned #16 & #18 on the handout, as these would be additional conditions. Attorney Brown concurred and that #18 is very similar to #16. A brief discussion followed, rioting it should be spelled out in more detail so there won't be a conflict. Vice Mayor Stubblefield continued that #16 enhanced #18, including the restrictions of the overall gross proceeds, requiring auditing, shelf space, restricted and total sales. Attorney Brown suggested language. Director Hults commented current standards limit alcohol sales to 25% of gross proceeds: It would be similar to downtown area restaurants. Vice Mayor Stubblefield questioned the shelf space and gross sales amount. Director Hults explained the distinction of the two separate conditions. Vice Mayor Stubblefield questioned if the percentage should be identified differently. Director Hults responded that it was necessary for the percentage to be set so that it protects that it does not become a liquor store primarily and the other items secondary. City Manager Barry McClellan commented that that higher percentage is based on the cost of food in a restaurant, as those costs are more than shelf items in convenience store. Mayor Buydos commented a convenience store appears to be synonymous with liquor store. Attorney Brown reflected on the evolution of the convenience store as we know it today. City Council Minutes November 3, 2005 Page 6 of 18 Council Member Ritchie commented that this particular store is more cf a, mid level store because of the larger meat store it provides a larger variety of fish and specialty items like came asada. Council Member Ayres commented that his beliefs are the same: The new information hasn't changed his mind. He doesn't see the upgrade of the license as a problem: It is not over saturation; it is in compliance; and there have been no policing problems with them. They have done security cameras. He sees this as the small business man investing in the community. He is in agreement with the applicant doesn't believe #7 should be assessed to this applicant. He closed noting that as the City expands, the Council can expect to see more liquor licenses as growth continues westward. Council Member Shaw commented on the Council's earlier discussion on similar issues with a shopping center for the AM/PM. The variance was granted based on the right to do business and it is Council's due diligence to represent all citizens. Regarding the single can sales issue, it is sold in single cans in other liquor stores. It will continue to be an issue. Somehow the Council needs to get the issue resolved. Mayor Buydos responded that is why the Council has the right to regulate liquor licenses and the conditions under which they operate. She called for a motion. M/S/C (Stubblefield / Ayres) moved to approve CUP 3-05 removing Condition #7 and adding #19 thru #21 (see revised Resolution No. 2819); #16 amended and replaces original language (replaced in final version #16 in Resolution No. 2819). Clarification noted. Motion carried 4/1 following alphabetical roll call vote, with Mayor Buydos voting last. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield Nays: Buydos Absent: None Abstain: None 5. CITY DEPARTMENTS 5.1 Planning Commission Appointments / Appoint three Planning Commissioners — 2 full four (4) year terms and 1 for the balance of a vacated seat / Ad Hoc Interview Subcommittee Council Member Shaw reported that he, Council Member Ritchie, and City Treasurer Jim Potts comprised the subcommittee. Treasurer Potts was included because he chaired the Planning Commission in Fontana City Council Minutes November 3, 2005 Page 7 of 18 for several years and his expertise vvould be valuable. There were 30 applications, it shows the growth, energy and support of the Co.unc.-..ils' endeavors. Eight applicants were interviewed, with two incumbents. Council Member Ritchie commented that they interviewed a woric.'leilul group: He believes they need diversity on the Planning Commission and consequently, need female representation. He then commented since his time on Council how his appreciation of Mayor Buydos has grown. The candidates beside the incumbents that rose above the others were Gordon Houston and Bonnie Fricke. Ms Fricke has been consistent about her applying to become involved in the community. He believes Mr. Houston provides a valuable historical aspect. Therefore, the recommendation is that Mr, Houston be appointed along with the incumbents Mr. Rao and Mr. Tolliver. Mayor Buydos questioned who would fill which terms. She suggested the incumbents fill the four year terms and Mr. Houston fill the vacated seat by former Planning Commissioner Cope. Council Member Ritchie asked if there is a vacancy if they could recommend Bonnie Fricke? Mayor Buydos commented that Council can always decide how to select the replacement if a vacancy occurs. Attorney Brown concurred. Council Member Ritchie commented that he'd like to see some diversity on the Planning Commission, as council has a female. Mayor Buydos commented that she was here (on council) for her knowledge and not for diversity. Council Member Ayres commented the council can't pre -decide the outcome, as it is not advertised that way. Attorney Brown instructed council that to do so they would have to re -advertise; and suggested just saying there are strong candidates. Mayor Buydos encouraged the applicants that are not selected tonight to stay engaged and especially continue going to Planning Commission meetings. It makes them stronger candidates. City Treasurer Potts concurred with Mayor Buydos' statement and noted with the explosive growth in the community there are many areas to get involved in. With the General Plan adoption eminent, it would be disastrous to have three planning commissioners that were not familiar with issues. Council Member Ayres commented that Council should not be boxed in: not a gender issue but it is about selecting the best possible candidate; Vinay Rao and Rod Tolliver have done excellent work on the commission in the past. Applicant Gordon Houston's qualifications are excellent. City Council Minutes November 3, 2005 Page 8 of 18 M/S/ C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to appoint Cordon Houston to fill the v seat and the incumbents Vinay Rao and Rod Tolliver the four terms. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.2 Park Master Plan / Approve and Adopt/Community Development Director 'Mayor moved to hear 5.2 after item 5.5. The Council unanimousy= concurred. 5.3 Stop Signs and Speed Hump request at First Street and Mistletoe Avenue / Approve traffic calming devices - 4-way stop signs at said intersection, 25 mph traffic signs and speed humps / City Engineer City Engineer Habib Motlagh noted the average speed on First Street was 42 mph, which is much higher than the recommendation. It should be 25 mph. Public works staff recommends placing 25 mph signs and stop signs on First and Mistletoe. Engineer Motlagh noted the warrants for stop signs are not currently met. However, because of the long street, recommended approval. Council Members Ayres commented there was a similar situation on Pico and Second Street. Stop signs were denied probably two years ago. He expressed concerns if the area doesn't meet the warrants. City Engineer Motlagh responded that he had discussed this with the City Attorney, who had discussed it with PERMA (Citys insurance carrier). If the council approves it, the engineer will sign and date the report, PERMA is comfortable with the process. Council Member Ayres questioned if it was the same process as Main Street. Engineer Motlagh responded that it was. The special circumstance there was the park. Council Member Ritchie commented 42 mph is just the 85 percentile. If the speed survey was compared to the industry standard, the speed limit would be 50 mph. City Engineer Motlagh explained the criteria: The street meets the Vehicle Code for number of driveways. Council Member Ritchie commented he is in favor of stop signs and mitigation. He asked about Alessandro instead of Mistletoe? He suggested the four-way stop City Council Minutes November ?, 2005 Page of 18 Suns because of that development with direct access to the Expre8sEvay While there is a severe dip, it probably doesn't slow anyone down. Engineer Ivlotiagh commented that Mistletoe was selected because it is it the middle: Alessandro Is a 000d candidate but Mistletoe is better. Council Member Ayres commented that when the development starts on Alessandro, then the stop signs will be warranted. Engineer Motlagh added that when JD Pierce's development goes forward, they will have the numbers to require stop signs. Vice Mayor Stubblefield commented that as a former resident of that neighborhood, it is needed, Stop signs will slaw, traffic on a long street that speeders consistently use. He also, believes location of stop signs appropriate. Council Member Ritchie suggested, having worked the area in traffic department that a radar trailer be set out on a regular basis for the first 30-60 days. He further suggested traffic mitigation to notify members of the surrounding neighborhood; and a press release. M,lonso Leaezma, 473 E First Street, commented he went to his neighbors when stop signs went in on Main Street. Traffic still moves but reduces speeding. Mr. Ledesma commented he supports this and stop signs at Alessandro: During the mornings the streets are dangerous. Luis C Moreno, 495 First Street, lives on the corner of Mistletoe and First. He has lived there since 1993, and there are more accidents than on the report. He reported kids use it like a drag strip and it is a safety issue. Shannon Shunk, 480 E First Street, lives across from Mr. Ledezma and emphasized the big problem with speeders. She leaves for work at approximately 6:00 am and has difficulty backing out of driveway. She believes the speeders are traveling in excess of 70 mph. She requested something be done about speeding. Termel S Lasater, "Terry,"488 E First Street, lives on the northwest corner of Mistletoe and First. He noted there is lots of traffic between 6 and 7. Driveways are an issue but it will be a lot safer with stop signs. Council Member Ritchie questioned if the traffic has gotten heavier or faster since the stop signs on Main Street were installed? Mr. Lasater responded that First is used to avoid Main Street stop signs, while traffic on Main Street is slower. He suggested motorcycle cop to use microphone to tell people to slow down. He supports approval. Larry B. Shea, 503 E First Street— Three of four corners were looked at presently for comments: He looked at the recorded speeds over two City Council Minutes November 3, 2005 Page 10 of 18 days: 4..5% were at or above freeway speed. He commented he would appreciate council's approval and he agreed with Mr. Lasater about the traffic on First Street being used to get away from other streets with stop signs. Tom Stripp, 46C E First Street — virritten comment accepted. Mayor Buydos commented that the criteria fie w is based on accidents and deaths, which is after the fact. She noted the City will continue to monitor. She believes in the full recommendation with stop signs, traffic calming and monitoring. City Engineer Motlagh reviewed staff recommendations. It will be brought back for review in six months. He noted he wouid like to get away from speed humps at this time but would consider striping. However, there is no money budgeted for striping. Council Member Ritchie suggested something over the limit line, i.e. pot dots. City Engineer Motiagh noted that too far out are a nuisance but could be used right at stop sign and are inexpensive. He will include them. Council Member Ayres commented that neighborhoods that have them, historically don't like them, and have had them taken out. He suggested using them if the other doesn't work. Council Member Ritchie commented it is a behavior thing that is being attempted to be changed. M/S1C (Ayres / Shaw) moved to approve four way stop signs at Mistletoe and First Streets; correspondence to be sent to neighborhood; and a review in six months. City Manager McClellan suggested adjusting size of stop sign to increase awareness. He also, suggested two weeks before sign goes in to have warning signs. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.4 Stop signs and crosswalks at Sagecrest and MaVaga / Approve installation of crosswalks and consider 4-way stop signs at said intersection / City Engineer City Engineer Motlagh gave the staff report. It was based on Council Member Ritchie's request. The research determined the recommendation: The warrants are not there. However, it is in the City Council Minutes November 3, 2005 Paoe 11 of 18 vicinity of a school and suggested 4-wry stop signs and crosswalks; th council's packet has recommendations from the police department and evil: be reviewing these later. They are not part of tonight's proposal. Mayor Buydos reviewed some of the history; knowing once the school was operational the complexion would change. Principal Vincent Record of Record Elementary spoke. Because they can see up corning stop light; traffic speeds up to catch a green light. There have been several incidents. It is hazardous predominantly for walking students to and from school: It is a safety issue for students. Council Member Shaw questioned if they use a crossing guard at this intersection. Principal Record responded that they do and will continue to do so. MI/S/C (Ayres / three simultaneous seconds) moved to approve four-way stop signs and crosswalks as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.5 San Jacinto River levee extension / Receive and File info• rmational update / City Engineer City Engineer Motlagh introduced Michael Rawson, from Flood Control; Kim Byrens, BB&K Bond Counsel; Scott Hildebrandt from Webb & Associates (Albert A. Webb and Associates). He noted the last review on the levee extension took place in June '05. Mr. Hildebrandt did a PowerPoint presentation. City Engineer Motlagh commented the council's subcommittee meets on a monthly basis. The area has been identified, both in the city and the county. First they identified the need. They took out the land presently being developed or separated as protected land. Without the San Jacinto levee and removing that flood plain area, there is still an impact even with improvements of the system. When financing options were reviewed, they project about $25.4 million or about $30,000 an acre for rights of way — see page 10 of handout. That leaves $18.5 million to be funded. The standard criteria accepted across Riverside County were applied. Mr. Hildebrandt reviewed the assumptions (see page 12). He then reviewed $2450 EDU, which is less than 10% needed to build the levee City Council Minutes November 3, 2005 Page 12 of 18 project depending on the area included. He reviewed the affect different alternatives. ' Mayor Buydos commented that this is bout information; not asking for any direction. Ms Byrens reported on the financing options (see page I7-end of report). Mayor Buydos questioned if special district funding versus an assessment district would need to be included in the soon -to -be -updated General Plan. Mr. Hildebrandt responded affirmatively but noted it still has to be built. Mr. Hildebrandt commented on the importance of the master drainaoe plans. In acquiring rights of way, if the land is currently in the adopted master plan the value is quite different than raw land. He suggested pushing into the San Jacinto Master Plan and paralleling it into levee; also, area drainage fees -could reimburse developers. Council Member Ayres commented that in this year's state legislation coming forward could assist in financing these large projects. He added he would like to have a firm commitment from Riverside County of $7 million or more. Since the revised cost is so much higher, he would like to see a bigger commitment from the county. Michael Rawson, Flood Control; informed the Council they could not find interest at the federal level. Dairy land is among others that is not valued. $7 million is one among other projects; This $7 million has been carried in their capital improvements plan for the past 4-5 years. Mr. Rawson noted that for Flood Control it is a significant amount; money is highly competitive. Mayor Buydos questioned how the requested meeting with two of the County Supervisors was progressing. Mr. Rawson responded that Flood Control is interested; San Jacinto Watershed Council would like them to take the lead because of access to all the stakeholders. Mayor Buydos emphasized the importance of all the stakeholders doing their part to keep it moving forward. Mr. Rawson commented he is not aware of any progress. Mayor Buydos questioned how does the City move this along? The City has to be moving this forward, as it will impact development moving forward in the city. If a resolution is needed, Council would be willing to do one. Council Member Ayres commented it is difficult to respond to citizens in the affected area, as they can't give them answers. Mayor Buydos City Council Minutes. November 3, 2005 Page ?3of18 commented that if the City had jurisdiction it would be to king the next step but can't because the city doesn't have jurisdiction. She Encouraged Flood Control to make their next priority. Council Member Ritchie commented it impacts the future of the 'y 79 alignment and Midcounty Parkway. He believes there should be federal money. He gave an example of losing Bridge Street because of not meeting federal criteria. Mayor Buydos commented public structures, i.e. roads or dairies - are not used to measure (meet federal criteria). Private structures only and primarily residential are what is used. Mayor Buydos implored Flood Control and staff to get this moving forward. lt needs to be given a higher priority at the Council level. Even after facilitating meetings with over 30 attendees; concepts for discussions are a priority before staff brings back. She noted Mr. Hildebrandt and City Engineer Motlagh are available for discussion and answer questions. Engineer Motlagh commented that the Department of Commerce is going to be here for a visit and their main issue is the levee. He reviewed the next time and date of the next stakeholders' meeting. Costs are only going up; the environmental document is nearly finished. Staff will need direction soon. Mayor Buydos questioned who was the lead agency for the environmental document. Engineer Motlagh replied that it is a joint effort between Flood Control and the attorneys' office. Information is available from Michell Roulet's office. Mr. Hildebrandt explained that direction is needed because without the mitigated negative declaration, the permit application can not be submitted. The timing issues are huge. Mayor Buydos thanked staff and those working on this project for the information and education. Mr. Hildebrandt addressed the gap area. The San Jacinto Resource Council believes that area has larger issues to deal with like water education for that gap area. It was agreed at their meeting SJRC would take the lead. !t is an agency ordained by the State of California. They have had some other priorities for public education about watershed and Mystic Lake and now moving forward on the river issues. As a consultant he has been keeping an eye on it, too. Mayor Buydos questioned what it takes to make this issue a priority with two supervisors. She commented the City needs to be protecting quality City Council Minutes November 3, 2005 Paoe 14 of 18 of life and assisting developments that are wanting to, move forward. She commented again on the large number of stakeholders present. She suggested under her signature a letter questioning what their intent is. In her opinion, nothing is being done or is there any evidence cf it being a priority for the County. Council Member Ayres suggested a resolution with surrounding entitles participating, noting the City Manager could take it to the board of supervisors. The rest of the City Council concurred. Mayor Buydos recessC the re r mee i ng at 9:25 pand reconvened it at 9:47 p.m. Note: 5.2 —taken cut of order. 5.2 Park Master Plan 1 Approve and Adopt 1 Community Development Director Community Development Director Hults reviewed the development of the plan and its highlights. M/S/C (Ritchie / Shaw) moved to approve the Park Master Plan as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None Todd Bagley (consultant) thanked the Council, noting that this plan is adaptable with lots of flexibility; and yet, creates the necessary standards. It also outlines a funding plan. He recommended continuing communication with Valley Wide. Mr. Bagley further noted the Parks Department will have to expand with this plan. His final suggestion was to have conversation with the City of Hemet to link both City's trail heads. Mayor Buydos requested a funding analysis be brought back to council in the next 3-6 months. 5.6 Police vehicle graphic's design / Approve and Authorize the change in police vehicle graphics to be paid from the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund Grant (SLESF) / Chief of Police Chief of Police Mitch Alm gave the staff report, noting the reason for proposing the change is that said graphics have not been updated since City Council Minutes November 3, 2005 Page 15 of 18 1999. The graphics look dated and it resembles Hemet's. The current designs are worn, faded, and now can use a new more reflective paint. Council Member Ayres commented the Council Pubic Safety Subcommittee reviewed this request and they support. The employees selected the design. Vice Mayor Stubblefield commented he supports the design, too. Council Member Ritchie commented that La Quinta has a mountain on theirs. San Jacinto previously had the San Jacinto mountains on their logo, which he likes. He then questioned if it is appropriate to promote something on police car bumpers, i.e. one program or another. He suggested the Public Safety Subcommittee look at it, i.e. domestic 'violence phone number. MiS/C (Ayres /Stubblefield) moved to approve and authorize the change in police vehicle graphics to be paid from the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund Grant (SLESF). Motion carried 5/0 Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.7 Request for appropriation of $7,500 from Undesignated, Unreserved General Fund balance to pay for the relocation of /5 donated Canary Island date palm trees / Approve / City Manager City Manager McClellan reviewed the staff report. He noted he would like to have them planted at the Estudillo Mansion, but can't authorize to have them planted there until federal funding has been received. He noted the trees are worth $120,000: They could be kept until next year. Council Member Ayres noted that it takes a generation to get a mature palm tree. He question why the Park Master Plan, if it can't be implemented. Mayor Buydos responded it has to do with the existing grants and the approvals they require. Redevelopment Operations Manager Pasarow commented that with the grants is a 50-year easement that the grantor will approve everything — the state historic preservation officer has to approve the report on the property. They required this at the time the museum was relocated to the City Council Minutes November 3, 2005 Page 16 of 16 Estudillo Mansion's grounds. The designs have to be approved after the report is finished and signed off by the state historic preservation. Mayor Buydos commented she didn't realze the project was being held up. Manager Pasarow responded that he continues to be in conversation with the consultant: He then read his letter and their response. Mayor Buydos stated she wanted a report from the City Manager as to when and where progress was happening at the mansion. Council Member Ayres commented the emphasis needs to be to get the parking lot done before the next 4th of duly. M/SIC (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve $7,500 from Undesignated, Unreserved General Fund balance to pay for the relocation of 15 donated Canary Island date palm trees. Motion carried 5/0. Ayres: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.8 Resolution No 2820 / A Resolution ap;•;roving the job 'escription and salary range for a Senior Code Enforcement Officer / Approve and Adopt / Community Development Direct M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve and adopt Resolution 2820 approving the job description and salary range for a Senior Code Enforcement Officer. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.9 Department Report / City Engineering City Engineer Habib Motlagh commented on the drainage plan update and explained the delays. There have been six meetings since April. The cost is somewhere between $500,000 to $1,000,000. The De Anza pavement rehabilitation project is on hold. Affected developers in the area are being conditioned to participate. After Line G is done, the City will complete the balance. City Council Minutes November 3; 2005 Page 17 of 18 State Street — stopped left turns on State Street from idyilwild Drive — interim improvements are done and then eventually a stop light, Council Member Ritchie commented it is not only the turn issue but also, the traffic bypassing issue — from idyllwild onto Eagle and there is also an oversized tree visibility issue. City Engineer I-Acted-1 reported he has been working with CalTrans for environment& approval (State Et Improvements) since June: He hopes to have it ready to bring back to council in 2-3 months. Lyon Ave basin — awaiting EMVVD approval Ramona Expressway and Eagle — signal will be installed there shortly TUMF update - Sanderson to City limits on west end; consultant hired; aerial done. He noted can't go past Warren Road. MSHCF — some species will have to be relocated or purchased Storm drain from Main Street to Osborne's project — info in 'Gen rnfo" Mayor Buydos recessed the Regular Meeting to consider the RDA Agenda at 10:25. p.m. and reconvened at 10:25:30 6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER PRE No reports were made. P FITS / DSCUSSSNS At 10:25 p.m. Mayor Buydos recessed the regular meeting and reconvened in Closed Session. 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Subdivision (C) of Section 54956.9: One (1) potential case No reportable action. 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: APNs 437-045-009, 437-045-010 Agency negotiators: City Manager and City Attorney City Council Minutes Novembei 3, 2005 Page 18 of 18 Negotiating parties: Thanh Le Tung & Tuyet Hong Nguyen Under negotiation: Price and Terms No reportable action. 7.3. CONFERENCE WITH LA OR NEGOTiATORS Agency designated representatives: City Attorney Employee organization: Management Association No reportable action. 8. ADJOURNMENT With no further business before the Council, Mayor Buydos adjourned the meeting, at 11:32 p.m. ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk City of San Jacinto By Chris Carlson Buydos, Mayor Approved as read Approved as amended City Council Agenda May 5, 2005 Page 5 of 5 If you challenge any action of the City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council (c/o the City Clerk) at, or prior to, the public hearing. CHALLENGE TO LAND USE DECISIONS: Any person seeking to challenge a decision regarding land use made by the City Council as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and the discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the City Council, shall be required to commence that action 90 days following the date on which the decision of the City Council becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Please refer to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes final. it is the intention of the City of San Jacinto to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact City Hall at (951) 487-7330, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. I, Dorothy L. Chouinard, City C1 rkof the City ofSan Jacinto, do hereby cent f that I caused to 6e posted the foregoing agenda this 29th clay ofApril 2005 as required 6y raw. PROCLAMATION MAY 2005 IS MENTAL HEALTI- MONTH WHEREAS, the U.S. Surgeon General states that mental' health -is fundamental to health and indispensable to personal well being family and interpersonal relationships, and contributes to com- munity and society; and WHEREAS, the U.S. Surgeon General confirms that mental affects one in five Ameri- cans every year, regardless of age, gender, race, ethnicity, religion or economic status; and, WHEREAS, the U.S. Surgeon General has found that a range of treatments exists for most mental disorders and the efficacy of mental health treatments are well documented; and, WHEREAS, the County of Riverside has made a commitment to community -based systems of mental health care for all residents; and, WHEREAS, the guiding principles of community mental health care have always been com- prehensiveness, cost -efficiency, effective management and high -quality and consumer -responsive services, and these principles are now being adopted by private and public healthcare payers; and, WHEREAS, the National Mental Health Association, the National Council for Community Be- havioral Healthcare, and their national partners observe Mental Health Month every May to raise awareness and understanding of mental health and illness. NOW, THEREFORE,THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO HEREBY PRO- CLAIMS The Month of May,2005, as Mental Health Month in the City of San Jacinto and call upon all residents, citizens, govemment agencies, public and private institutions, businesses and schools to recommit our community to increasing awareness and understanding of mental illness and the need for appropriate and accessible services for all people with mental illness. Dated this 21st day of April, 2005. Dale Stubblefield.. . icev1ayo Ken haw, CouncilMember Chris Carlson Buydos, Mayor . • ". . , • '.„„ yres, Cojcil Mernber Robert titchie, Council Member -Fit s }he miss ; -03 S peepoti--q For this particular petition, the landowner has elected to take the immediate ---- termination of the Land Conservation contract. The applicant has proposed a residential development, Tentative Tract 31759, currently under review by the City. As indicated above, the first step toward development is the termination of the Williamson Act contract. That first step was completed with the filing and ultimate recording of two notices of non -renewal. The Department of Conservation was contacted for comment and their response is attached. As required, to get the cancellation fee the Riverside County Assessor has assessed the property and provided their report for the cancellation fee. In order for the cancellation to be approved, the City Council determines a cancellation fee and certifies the amount then holds its public hearing on the cancellation petition, in which the City Council make the following findings: JUSTIFICATION: 1. That the cancellation is consistent with the Williamson Act; or a. That a notice of non renewal has been served; FACT: According to records of the Riverside County Recorders office notices of non -renewal have been recorded on August 2, 2004 as documents 2004-0600511 and 2004-06000512 b. That the cancellation is not likely to result in the removal of adjacent lands from agricultural use; FACT: The site and surrounding parcels are designated and zoned for residential use in the City's General Plan. Tentative Tract 31760, south and adjacent to the site and the 246 acre Cove Specific Plan lies further to the south and as the surrounding lands are designated and zoned for residential uses it is unlikely that the cancellation will result in the removal of adjacent lands from agricultural use. c. That the cancellation is for an alternative use which is consistent with the applicable provision of the General Plan; FACT: The site and the surrounding are designated and zoned for residential development d. That the cancellation will not result in discontiguous patterns of urban development; FACT: As indicated above, the site is has a General Plan designation for residential uses. The General Plan for the entire area is also zoned for Page 3 of 5 bei,v 4 z 5" r%° April 27, 2005 City of San Jacinto Case Planner: John Freiman Community Development Department 248 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 RE: PUD2-04, TTM 32376, GPA NO. 7-04, CZ 3-04, AND VA 1-05 Dear Mr. Frieman: Thank you for taking the time to describe the proposed flood control channel that will accompany the above referenced housing project. From what you described, the flood control channel you are planning is quite sizeable in both width and depth, up to a depth of 8 feet. You indicted that the channel would only be filled to capacity during the heaviest storms and that is what concerns this community the most. The undersigned are all property owners that back up to your proposed channel and wish to express our mutual concern. We feel that the most reasonable option of protecting our best interests is to have a block wall run the entire length of the current wooden fencing along the proposed project line. This type of fencing would do the most to protect the occupants during the those times of "heaviest storms." Thank you for taking the time to review our concerns, we look forward to your response. j6 o b cL Como L err Sc � 24 9 M it ciC i NI 1 e (2.Cc_. d sf , t 6 ,61fig, .geog)c✓x> Q2„3 QALf szhciumEvc.,t Ce04 B)-rr015 583 rtbin frAhoi ck (P.& a r 4` q po �� 131,cAiva-ac- d 1..21 0 C.t-17 30-4-4S wa-t, 5, 3SE3 SLvf.. zZ C /F., ,('S q2 P,3 c orr A7"/(F4(Lnl t Ea7 C6pAf2 A2F S k1 A'f 9.258-3 Y5 G U/tJ / 1 d '1- D 02 `� C r .r 13 ,`"ems CITY OF SAN JACINTO City Council Notice of Public Hearing Subject Site /f PUD 2-04,TTM 32376, GPA NO.7.04, CZ 3-04,tA AND VA 1.05 % tutt PROPOSAL AIPLICANT ENVIRONMENTAL DATE/TIME WI•IERE TO GO WHO TO CALL A Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a 339 unit single family detached residential development on 96.8 gross acres to be located north of the Ramona Expressway along the extension of San Jacinto Avenue. The project includes a request to annex 16.56 acres; therefore a Pre -Zone Change from the Cqunty's RA-5 to City R-1 zone is requested for these 16.56 acres, along with a Zone Change from R-1, W-2 and C-2 to R-1 for the balance of the site and a PUD overlay for the entire project site; a Tentative Tract Map; and a Variance to vary from the requirement for RV parking. WESTERN VILLAGE D MT. SAN JACINTO COLLEGE STATE ALESSANDRO AVI SAN JACINTO ART s STREET SITE Silverstone Development Co., Inc 15 Enterprise, Suite 130 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656 //f II JACINTO "R'VER PARK A Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been prepared and may be reviewed at the City offices. The City Council will consider adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the MMRP at their public hearing. May 5, 2005 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 S. San Jacinto San Jacinto, CA 92583 For additional information contact: Case Planner: John Freiman Community Development Dept. 248 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 (909) 487-7326 District Offices 111 T H E CITY OF SAN JACINTO 11.'"111111111 &ItANN).9 City Clerk TRANSMITTAL FORM TO: The Honorable Mayor & City Council Members City Manager & City Attorney Department Heads DATE: May 5, 2005 Enclosure: Revised Resolution for regular agenda item 4.1 For your information. _ In accordance with your request. X For your files. _ Please call to make an appointment. Please review _ Please pay Please sign and return. _ Please file and return conformed copy. _ Please telephone me. _ Your IMMEDIATE attention is necessary. Other: X Comments: We had some last minute revisions for the attached resolution regard 4.1 of your regular agenda packet. Please throw away the earlier version that was in your packet. Thank you.. Very truly yours, ouinard, City Clerk Z01 E Main Scree( • San Jacinto, CA 92583 Tel 909/487-7339 Fax: 909/654-3728 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO. 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE TENTATIVE CANCELLATION OF SAN JACINTO NO 2 LAND CONSERVATION CONTRACT FOR 122.83 ACRES LOCATED WEST OF WARREN ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE -MILE SOUTH OF THE RAMONA EXPRESSWAY AND LOCATED ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CASA LOMA CANAL. WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto has received an application from a landowner (the "Landowner") for cancellation of a Land Conservation Contract (pursuant to California Government Code, §§ 51200 et seq. (the "California Land Conservation Act of 1965" or "Williamson Act") with respect to a portion of property consisting of 122 acres of land, located west of Warren Road, approximately one -mile south of the Ramona Expressway and on either side of the Casa Loma canal (Riverside County Assessor's Parcel Nos. 425-220-009, 431-220-005, -007, -009, -010, -011 and 431-230-009) in the County of Riverside and more particularly depicted on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Subject Property"); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property lies within the Land Conservation Contract San Jacinto No 2, Amendment 1, Map 188 and is subject to that certain Land Conservation Contract dated February 28, 1972 and recorded as Instrument No. 25388 in the Official Records of the County of Riverside, California; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property lies within the Land Conservation Contract San Jacinto No 2, Amendment 1, Map 449 and is subject to that certain Land Conservation Contract dated January 11, 1978 and recorded as Instrument No. 5945 in the Official Records of the County of Riverside, California (the Land Conservation Contracts referenced in this Recital and the preceding Recital shall hereinafter be referred to as the "Land Conservation Contracts"); and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 51282 permits a landowner to petition the City Council for the City of San Jacinto ("City Council") to cancel a Land Conservation Contract; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 51282 permits the City Council to grant tentative approval for the cancellation of the Land Conservation Contracts (or a portion thereof) where the City Council finds that certain requirements have been satisfied; and, RVPUBUSB\693169.1 WHEREAS, the Landowner has applied for an alternative land use for the Subject Property, consisting of the development of 318 single family homes (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 51284.1, City staff has submitted a notice of transmittal to the California Director of the Department of Conservation on November 3, 2004. The notice submitted by the County to the Director of the Department of Conservation included: (1) an attached copy of the petition, (2) an attached copy of the Land Conservation Contracts, (3) a general description of the property subject to the contract that is proposed to be cancelled, and (4) the deadline for submitting comments on the proposed partial cancellation; and, WHEREAS, the City received comments from the Department of Conservation on December 17, 2004, and the City Council has considered those comments in reaching its decision; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 51284, the City: (1) on April 14, 2005, published notice of the public hearing once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City, in compliance with Government Code section 6061, (2) on April 12, 2005, mailed notice of the public hearing to every owner of land under Williamson Act contract within one mile of the land on which the Land Conservation Contract cancellation is proposed, and (3) on March 4, 2005 mailed notice of the public hearing the Director of the Department of Conservation; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code, §§ 21000 et seq.), a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared, advertised, and circulated with regard to the proposed cancellation of the Land Conservation Contracts; and, WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the application for tentative cancellation of Landowner's Land Conservation Contracts with respect to the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the City Council did not receive any comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, WHEREAS, the following information has been submitted to warrant findings that the cancellation of the Land Conservation Contracts is consistent with the Williamson Act: 1. A Notice of Non -Renewal has been served and recorded in the office of the Riverside County Recorder in the form of document 2004-0600511 and 2004-06000512 pursuant to Government Code section 51245; 2. The Subject Property and surrounding parcels are already designated and zoned for residential uses in the City's General Plan and the surrounding lands are already designated and zoned for residential uses, it is RVPUBUS11.693I69. 1 Page 2 of 6 unlikely that the proposed cancellation will result in the removal of adjacent lands from agricultural uses; 3. That the cancellation is for an alternative use that is consistent with the applicable provisions of the City's General Plan because the Subject Property and surrounding land is designated and zoned for residential development; 4. The cancellation will not result in discontiguous patterns of urban development because Tentative Tract 31760, south of the Subject Property is approved as the 246 acre Cove Specific Plan and also, further to the southeast and west of Cawston Avenue is a project for which 297 home are proposed and the first 99 building permits have already been issued. Other residential developments are also proposed or approved in the area of the Conservation Land Contracts. 5. There is no proximate un-contracted land that is both available and suitable for the use to which the Subject Property is proposed to be put, and development of the Subject Property would provide more contiguous patterns of urban development than the development of proximate non -contracted land. Several properties south of the Subject Property are already in the process of residential development and are not available for the alternative use. In addition, there is no other non -contracted land for sale that is sufficiently close to the Subject Property and suitable for the alternative use such that it would serve as a practical alternative for the use that is proposed for the Subject Property. WHEREAS, the County of Riverside Assessor, in accordance with Government Code Section 51283, has determined and certified to the City Council the cancellation value of the Subject Property, as though it were free of the contractual restriction, as $6,642,510; and, WHEREAS, the City believes it has satisfied both its statutory obligations in finding that the cancellation of Landowner's Land Conservation Contracts relative to the Subject Property, consistent with the Williamson Act NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto Shasta as follows: Section 1. The City Council has considered and hereby adopts the findings of fact set forth in the above recitals. Section 2. The City Council has reviewed and considered the environmental documentation and information included in the staff reports prior to taking action on the Landowner's application for tentative cancellation of Landowner's Land Conservation Contracts with respect to the Subject Property, and finds and determines that the tentative cancellation of the Land Conservation Contracts will not cause or create a significant adverse effect on the environment because the mitigation measures RVPUBUSB\693169. 1 Page 3 of 6 described in the Initial Study. The City Council further finds and declares that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the City Council. Section 3. The City Council further finds and determines that there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City, that the cancellation would not have a significant effect on the environment. The documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City's findings and decision are based and are located at 248 E. Main Street, San Jacinto, CA 92583. The custodian of these documents and materials is Community Development Department. Section 4. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the cancellation of the Landowner's Land Conservation Contracts relative to the Subject Property is consistent with the Williamson Act, based on the written and verbal evidence presented to the City Council before, during and at the public hearing conducted prior to the adoption of this Resolution and based on the findings and recitals contained herein. Section 5. Pursuant to Government Code Section 51283, the City Council hereby determines and certifies the amount of the cancellation fee, which Landowner shall pay the County Treasurer, in the amount of $830,313.75, which is 12 1/2 percent of the total cancellation value as determined by the County of Riverside Office of the Assessor. Section 6. The City Council hereby tentatively approves the cancellation of Landowner's Land Conservation Contracts relative to the Subject Property. The cancellation of Landowner's Land Conservation Contract relative to the Subject Property shall be contingent upon the following two conditions being satisfied: 1. The cancellation fee of $830,313.75, which was determined and certified by the City Council pursuant to Government Code Sections 51283 and 51283.1, shall be paid in full prior to the issuance of the certificate of final cancellation. If the fee is not paid within one year from the date of the recording of the certificate of tentative cancellation, such fee shall be computed as of the date of notice when the Landowner notifies the City Council, in writing, that Landowner has satisfied the conditions and contingencies enumerated in this Section, and 2. The Landowner shall obtain all necessary permits, up to and including, grading permits, necessary to commence the Project. Section 7. The City Council hereby directs the City Clerk to: (1) prepare, file and transmit to the County Clerk for posting a Notice of Determination indicating that the City Council has adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this Resolution pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; (2) prepare, certify and transmit to the County Recorder a certificate of tentative cancellation (in a form meeting the requirements of Government Code Section 51283.4(a) and approved by the County Counsel); (3) publish a notice of this Resolution in accordance with Government Code RVPUBVSB\693169. 1 Page 4 of 6 Section 51284 within 30 days of the date hereof; and (4) within 30 days of the date hereof, deliver a copy of said published notice to the Director of Conservation in accordance with Government Code Section 51284. Section 8. City staff is hereby authorized and directed to take any and all actions that they or the City Attorney may deem necessary or advisable in order to effectuate the purpose and intent of this Resolution. Section 9. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect. Section 10. The Mayor shall sign, and the City Clerk shall certify to, the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 5th day of May 2005, by the following vote: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Abstain: City of San Jacinto By Chris Carlson Buydos, Mayor City of San Jacinto ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk RVPUBUSB\693169. 1 Page 5 of 6 Pg--- For this particular petition, the landowner has elected to take the immediate termination of the Land Conservation contract. The applicant has proposed a residential development, Tentative Tract 31759, currently under review by the City. As indicated above, the first step toward development is the termination of the Williamson Act contract. That first step was completed with the filing and ultimate recording of two notices of non -renewal. The Department of Conservation was contacted for comment and their response is attached. As required, to get the cancellation fee the Riverside County Assessor has assessed the property and provided their report for the cancellation fee. In order for the cancellation to be approved, the City Council determines a cancellation fee and certifies the amount then holds its public hearing on the cancellation petition, in which the City Council make the following findings: JUSTIFICATION: 1. That the cancellation is consistent with the Williamson Act; or a. That a notice of non renewal has been served; FACT: According to records of the Riverside County Recorders office notices of non -renewal have been recorded on August 2, 2004 as documents 2004-0600511 and 2004-06000512 b. That the cancellation is not likely to result in the removal of adjacent lands from agricultural use; FACT: The site and surrounding parcels are designated and zoned for residential use in the City's General Plan. Tentative Tract 31760, south and adjacent to the site and the 246 acre Cove Specific Plan lies further to the south and as the surrounding lands are designated and zoned for residential uses it is unlikely that the cancellation will result in the removal of adjacent lands from agricultural use. c. That the cancellation is for an alternative use which is consistent with the applicable provision of the General Plan; FACT: The site and the surrounding are designated and zoned for residential development d. That the cancellation will not result in discontiguous patterns of urban development; FACT: As indicated above, the site is has a General Plan designation for residential uses. The General Plan for the entire area is also zoned for Page 3 of 5 For this particular petition, the landowner has elected to take the immediate termination of the Land Conservation contract. The applicant has proposed a residential development, Tentative Tract 31759, currently under review by the City. As indicated above, the first step toward development is the termination of the Williamson Act contract. That first step was completed with the filing and ultimate recording of two notices of non -renewal. The Department of Conservation was contacted for comment and their response is attached. As required, to get the cancellation fee the Riverside County Assessor has assessed the property and provided their report for the cancellation fee. In order for the cancellation to be approved, the City Council determines a cancellation fee and certifies the amount then holds its public hearing on the cancellation petition, in which the City Council make the following findings: JUSTIFICATION: 1. That the cancellation is consistent with the Williamson Act; or a. That a notice of non renewal has been served; FACT: According to records of the Riverside County Recorders office notices of non -renewal have been recorded on August 2, 2004 as documents 2004-0600511 and 2004-06000512 b. That the cancellation is not likely to result in the removal of adjacent lands from agricultural use; FACT: The site and surrounding parcels are designated and zoned for residential use in the City's General Plan. Tentative Tract 31760, south and adjacent to the site and the 246 acre Cove Specific Plan lies further to the south and as the surrounding lands are designated and zoned for residential uses it is unlikely that the cancellation will result in the removal of adjacent lands from agricultural use. c. That the cancellation is for an alternative use which is consistent with the applicable provision of the General Plan; FACT: The site and the surrounding are designated and zoned for residential development d. That the cancellation will not result in discontiguous patterns of urban development; FACT: As indicated above, the site is has a General Plan designation for residential uses. The General Plan for the entire area is also zoned for Page 3 of 5 For this particular petition, the landowner has elected to take the immediate termination of the Land Conservation contract. The applicant has proposed a residential development, Tentative Tract 31759, currently under review by the City. As indicated above, the first step toward development is the termination of the Williamson Act contract. That first step was completed with the filing and ultimate recording of two notices of non -renewal. The Department of Conservation was contacted for comment and their response is attached. As required, to get the cancellation fee the Riverside County Assessor has assessed the property and provided their report for the cancellation fee. In order for the cancellation to be approved, the City Council determines a cancellation fee and certifies the amount then holds its public hearing on the cancellation petition, in which the City Council make the following findings: JUSTIFICATION: 1. That the cancellation is consistent with the Williamson Act; or a. That a notice of non renewal has been served; FACT: According to records of the Riverside County Recorders office notices of non -renewal have been recorded on August 2, 2004 as documents 2004-0600511 and 2004-06000512 b. That the cancellation is not likely to result in the removal of adjacent lands from agricultural use; FACT: The site and surrounding parcels are designated and zoned for residential use in the City's General Plan. Tentative Tract 31760, south and adjacent to the site and the 246 acre Cove Specific Plan lies further to the south and as the surrounding lands are designated and zoned for residential uses it is unlikely that the cancellation will result in the removal of adjacent lands from agricultural use. c. That the cancellation is for an alternative use which is consistent with the applicable provision of the General Plan; FACT: The site and the surrounding are designated and zoned for residential development d. That the cancellation will not result in discontiguous patterns of urban development; FACT: As indicated above, the site is has a General Plan designation for residential uses. The General Plan for the entire area is also zoned for Page 3 of 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) I, Dorothy L. Chouinard, duly appointed City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. _ , was adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of May 2005. Witness my hand and official seal this day of May, 2005. Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk RVPUBUSB\693169. 1 Page 6 of 6 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION for the proposed WESTERN VILLAGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Prepared by The City of San Jacinto Community Development Department 248 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 John Freiman, AICP (951) 487-7330 February 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction -------------------------- 1 Project Location Map ------------- --------- ----------- ------------- --------- 2 Purpose of Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration 3 Summary of findings 3 Summary of mitigation Measures: Light and Glare 4 Air Quality 4 Biological Resources ------------- --- ------- -------- ------------------- 5 Cultural Resources ----- ----------- ---- ------- -------- ------------------ 6 Geology and Soils 6 Hydrology and Water Quality 6 Noise 7 Public Services 7 Recreation 7 Transportation/Traffic 7 Utilities and Service Systems -- --------- --- ------ ------ ------------ 7 Environmental Analysis: Aesthetics 8 Agricultural Resources -------------- 9 Air Quality 9 Biological Resources 14 Cultural Resources 16 Geology and Soils 18 Hazards and hazardous Materials 19 Hydrology and Water Quality 20 Land Use and Planning 26 Mineral Resources 26 Noise 27 Population and Housing ----- ------- —--------- —------- 29 PublicServices ----- ------- --- ----- ----------------------------- 30 Recreation 33 Transportation/Traffic------------ ----------------------- --------------------- 34 Utilities and Service Systems 37 Mandatory Findings of Significance 39 Notes 41 Appendix A: Environmental Checklist Form J Appendix B: Table 1 and Table 2 of SCAQMD Rule 403 Appendix C: MSHCP Documents Appendix D: Site Grading Recommendations Appendix E: FEMA CLOMAR-F Documents Appendix F: Traffic Study recommended mitigation measures Appendix G: Service Letters Appendix H: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Introduction This document is intended to evaluate the potential environmental effects of the project described below and, where appropriate, propose mitigation measures to reduce the impacts to a level of insignificance. The proposed project is a Planned Unit Development to be known as Western Village. The project site is located on the north side of the Ramona Expressway along the northerly extension of San Jacinto Boulevard. The total gross area of the site is 96.8 acres within which are proposed 339 residential lots ranging in size from 5,000 square foot minimum lot size to 7,200 square feet and larger, for an overall density of 3.5 dwelling units per acre. Also proposed on site are two parks: one 3.9 acres in size and the other 1.5 acres in size; and a 3.8 acre detention basin. A portion of the site (two parcels totaling 16.5 acres) is currently in the County, and is proposed for annexation to the City. The project is considered consistent with the City's General Plan that designates the site as Low Density Residential, up to 5 dwelling units per acre. The purpose of a Planned Unit Development is to: • Encourage a more desirable living environment; • Encourage a more efficient, desirable and aesthetic uses of land through utilization of modern innovations in residential development; • Encourage the reservation of a greater proportion of land for common open areas; • Encourage the retention of natural slopes, waterways, and other natural features by utilizing such areas as open space; • Encourage more efficient use of these public facilities required in connection with such residential development; and • Insure compatibility with established residential areas. (City zoning ordinance, Article 8B). In order to accomplish these purposes, a number of entitlements are necessary and therefore the following applications have been submitted and are intended to be covered by this document: • A zone change to add a PUD overlay; • A pre -zone change from County RA-5 to R-1 for that portion currently in the County; • A request to annex two parcels totaling 16.56 acres; • A General Plan Amendment to add the proposed annexation area to the general Plan and to delete San Jacinto Avenue as a Collector Street north of the Ramona Expressway; • A Tentative Tract Map (TT No. 32376; and • A variance application to waive the requirement to provide RV parking spaces. NOIIVDOIIDaf01Id IJ kepunos pefaid r yak, I / / ,' / ff, 2: g „.i. / ,' fro VaraiVia' .. 44:4,,,a,, / 4:7, e../ . ' ', rt..4 . / g *"' * " \ 4`. __J.tri Lan_ / ..,>..5. ,c.,.• ..t4 47, / —,,,,i, .,." ...,-, ..„, ,...,..../ iptilli.SL ri _._. ; " i , \Kilat• • se/ '4 .ogyl,a5 ii F hu.., Mink erica maivar lWeJj ;;44 /04 / • Fi / \/ •1. / 4st int.h111:1; -6')‘ e. • -""r4 'As 44-• — • , / Allan gv Aa el 4. Y [ida .1...ltafill0...... Camlno_llaalas .Cecella___ i5alarn. Purpose of the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration As part of the environmental review process, the City has prepared this Initial Study. The Initial Study provides a basis for understanding whether there are adverse environmental impacts associates with the proposed project and, if such impacts are likely to occur, if these impacts would be significant. Section 15063 of the State CEQA Guidelines states the purposes of the Initial Study are: • To provide the City with information to use as a basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or a Negative Declaration of the project; • To enable the City to modify the project, reducing or eliminating any adverse impacts before an EIR is prepared, thereby enabling the project to qualify for a Negative Declaration; • To assist in the preparation of an EIR, if one is required, by focusing the EIR on the effects determined to be significant; identifying effects determined not to be significant; and explaining reasons for determining that potentially significant effects would not be significant; • To identify whether a Program EIR, tiering, or another appropriate process can be used for the analysis of the project's environmental effects; • To facilitate the environmental review of the project early in its design; • To provide documentation for findings in a Negative Declaration that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment; • To eliminate unnecessary EIR's; and • To determine whether a previously prepared EIR can be used for the project. Based on the findings of the Initial Study, the City, acting as the Lead Agency, would then determine the subsequent environmental review process needed for the project, which may take the form of a Negative Declaration or an EIR. According to Section 21064 of the CEQA Guidelines, a Negative Declaration is a statement that describes the reasons why the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the environment. The Negative Declaration signifies that the project would not require additional environmental analysis in the form, of an EIR. Summary of findings The implementation of the proposed project would lead to changes in the existing environmental conditions at the project site and the surrounding area. Based on the findings of the environmental analysis contained herein, the implementation of the project could result in significant adverse impacts on a number of environmental issue areas if not properly mitigated. These areas include: aesthetics (light and glare), air quality, biological resources, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality, noise, public services, traffic, and utilities and service systems. Summary of Mitigation Measures AESTHETICS (LIGHT AND GLARE): • Any park lighting shall be directed downward and shielded to reduce glare. • Athletic field lighting, if any, shall be turned off upon completion of nighttime events to reduce skyglow. • When not in use, athletic field lighting, if any, shall be turned off by 11:00 PM. AIR QUALITY Short Term Impacts Mitigation Measures: • Prior to the granting of the first grading permit, the applicant shall submit appropriate permits from SCAQMD indicating compliance with the measures contained in Table 1 and Table 3 of SCAQMD Rule 403. To reduce construction equipment emissions, the following measures should be implemented when feasible and be included in grading and improvement plans specifications for implementation by contractors: • Use low emission mobile construction equipment. • Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them tuned. • Turn off equipment when not in use. Avoid idling of more than 80 minutes. • Use low sulfur fuel for stationary construction equipment. This is required by SCAQMD Rules 431.1 and 431.2. • Utilize existing power sources (Le., power poles) when feasible. This measure would minimize the use of higher polluting gas or diesel generators. • Configure construction parking to minimize traffic interference. • Minimize obstruction of through -traffic lanes. When feasible, construction should be planned so that lane closures on existing streets are kept to a minimum. • Schedule construction operations affecting traffic for off-peak hours. • Limit the application of architectural surface treatments during any one day, as feasible. • Develop a traffic plan to minimize traffic flow interference from construction activities (the plan may include advance public notice of routing, use of public transportation and satellite parking areas with a shuttle service). Long Term Impacts Mitigation Measures: The following measures should be implemented or included in the Specific Plan implementation as feasible: • Provide dedicated turn lanes as appropriate and provide roadway improvements at heavily congested roadways. 4 • Include residential design features that encourage trip elimination or trip diversion to alternative transportation, such as pre -wiring for 220V electric charging systems. • Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. Reduce the need to heat or cool structures by improving thermal integrity will result in a reduced expenditure of energy and a reduction in pollutant emissions. • Install energy efficient street lighting. • Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous sources MSC-01 measure. This measure reduces the need for cooling energy in the summer. • Synchronize traffic signals. The areas where this measure would be applicable are roadway intersections within the project area. This measure would be more effective if the roadways beyond the project limits are synchronized as well. • Solar heaters and central water heaters shall be encouraged for residential uses. • Provide increased insulation beyond Title 24 requirements. • Use all -electric landscape maintenance equipment. • Orient buildings North -South, as feasible. • Improve the walking environment by providing complete sidewalks, street trees, traffic -calming and signals, safe and visually interesting pedestrian walkways, and provide interconnected bikeways/bike lanes. • Use double -paned windows to reduce thermal loss. • Install energy -efficient appliances to reduce energy consumption. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: • No earlier that 45 days and no later than 20 days prior to construction or grading/site preparation activities that would occur during the nesting/breeding season of native bird species potentially nesting on the site (typically February through June), the applicant shall have a survey conducted by a qualified biologist to determine if active raptor nests protected by the California Fish and Game Code are present in the construction zone or within 200 feet of the construction zone. A report of this field survey shall be submitted to the appropriate agency. Construction can proceed if no active nests are located during this survey. If an active nest is found during the survey, a 500-foot (this distance may be varied depending on the bird species and construction activity, as determined by the biologist) fence barrier (subject to the review and approval of a qualified biologist) shall be erected around the nest site and clearing and construction within the fenced area shall be postponed or halted, at the discretion of the biologist monitor, until the nest is vacated and juveniles have fledged, as determined by the biologist, and there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. The biologist shall serve as a construction monitor during those periods when construction activities shall occur near active nests to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests shall occur. CULTURAL RESOURCES • If potentially significant archaeological evidence (e.g., stone artifacts, dark ashy soils or burned rocks, or old glass, metal or ceramic artifacts) becomes apparent during ground disturbances, work in that location should be diverted and a qualified archaeologist should be contacted immediately to evaluate the find. The property owner will then be notified if the materials are potentially significant, and the archaeologist may recommend further study. If human remains are discovered, the Riverside County Coroner's Office must be notified immediately under state law, and all activities in the area must cease until lawful measures have been implemented. If the Coroner determines that the remains are prehistoric, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento must also be contacted under state law. The NAHC will designate a Most Likely Descendent (MLD) who will have the authority to make procedural determinations concerning disposition of the remains. GEOLOGY AND SOILS • The seismic provisions included in the Uniform Building Code for Seismic Zone 4 should be considered the minimum design criteria. • Remedial grading within the proposed building areas include the over -excavation and re -compaction of the loose near surface soils as well as the primary foundation bearing soils. • The specific recommendations for site preparation are found in Appendix B, and shall be considered required mitigation measures. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY • Prior to any permits, the project will comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activity. A Notice of Intent shall be filed with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared and implemented. • Prior to any permits, the developer shall obtain a permit from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) through a Conditional Letter of Map Revision {CLOMR-F} to the flood Insurance Rate Maps to allow for the development of residential structures within a known floodplain. The development shall also comply with the City of San Jacinto's Floodplain Management Ordinance. • A storm drain system, approved by the City Engineer, shall be developed to transport the first flush runoff to a detention basin adequate to allow for the settlement of debris and loose soils that enter the stormwater system and prevent pollutants from entering off -site drainage channels and the San Jacinto River. Said detention basin shall be designed so that no increase in runoff will occur offsite. NOISE • To reduce the potential level of impact due to traffic noise along the Ramona Expressway, a six foot -high solid masonry wall shall be erected along the Ramona Expressway frontage. • Second -story balconies should not be constructed on those residences adjacent to the Expressway. • Appropriate HVAC mechanical shall be provided to achieve a "windows closed" condition for those residences adjacent to the Expressway. • Construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. Mondays through Saturdays, with no construction permitted on Sundays. PUBLIC SERVICES • The applicant/developer shall annex to CFD 2003-1 and pay the one-time fee of $612 per dwelling unit at building permit issuance, and the mitigation fees of $637 per dwelling unit prior to final inspection. • Proof of payment of school mitigation fees at time of building permit issuance: • Payment of park fee and/or dedication of parkland as required. • For other public services, payment of mitigation fees as adopted by the City prior to final inspection. RECREATION • Payment of park fee and/or dedication of parkland as required. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC • The recommendations contained in the Traffic Impact as shown in Appendix shall be required mitigation measures for the project. • The applicant/developer shall also pay all required development fees prior to final inspection. UTIITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS • Compliance with NPDES and SWPPP requirements, City and EMWD standards. • Payment of the City Sewer fee of $200 per dwelling unit prior to final occupancy. 7 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The documents cited herein are located in the San Jacinto Community Development Department, 248 E. Main Street, San Jacinto, CA, and are included herein by reference. They are available for viewing during normal department hours. 1 AESTHETICS: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? The site presently is vacant and has a view of the mountains to the north and east. Development of the site as proposed will have little effect on the views of adjacent properties as few are developed. The view of the mountains will still be available over the proposed residences. Impact: Less than significant impact. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? There are no scenic resources, trees, rock outcroppings, or historic buildings on the site. (1), (2) Impact: No impact. c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? The site is currently vacant and has no significant visual assets on -site to degrade. Impact: No impact. d) Create a new source of substantial Tight or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? The primary source of new light or glare will be residential yard lighting. There may be higher, brighter more concentrated lighting in one or both of the proposed parks. The site is not within the County's Mt. Palomar Observatory skyglow area. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate local impacts, the following mitigation measures are required: • Any park lighting shall be directed downward and shielded to reduce glare. • Athletic field lighting, if any, shall be turned off upon completion of nighttime events to reduce skyglow. 8 • When not in use, athletic field lighting, if any, shall be turned off by 11:00 PM. Impact: Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No portion of the project site is designated as Prime farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. A portion of the site is designated as "Other Land". (Map: Riverside County Important Farmland 2002. State of California Resources Agency, Department of Conservation) Impact: No impact. b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Two parcels proposed for annexation into the City are zoned County RA-5 (Residential Agriculture, 5 acre minimum lot size). They are not currently used for agriculture and have not been for some time. The properties will be prezoned R-1 (One Family Residential), such zoning to become effective upon annexation. No part of the project site is within a Williamson Act contract. Impact: Less than significant impact. c. Involve other changes in the existing environment that, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? There are no agricultural uses adjacent to be affected by this project. There is a commercial plant nursery adjacent to a limited portion of the site to the east. The project should not affect the operation of the nursery. San Jacinto has a "right -to - farm" ordinance that recognizes the right of existing agricultural uses to continue to operate as adjacent lands become urbanized. Impact: No impact. III. AIR QUALITY: Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? The project lies within the South Coast Air Basin and falls under the responsibility of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The SCAQMD has adopted the South Coast Air Management Plan (AQMP), and the project is required by CEQA to be consistent with the AQMP. The Air Quality Assessment prepared for the plan states the following: 9 "A proposed project should be considered to be consistent with the plan if it furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency: (1) Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP (except as provided for CO in Section 9.4 for relocating CO hot spots). (2) Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP in 2010 or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase. (3, p. 17) Regarding criterion 1, the report states: "Based on the air quality modeling analysis contained in this report, there will not be any short-term local air quality impacts during construction of the project. Construction will not produce emissions greater than the SCAQMD thresholds." "The proposed project will increase regional emissions, and will increase regional emissions by an amount grater than the SCAQMD thresholds for CO and NOx (refer to Section 2.4.3). However, the project is not projected to contribute significantly to the local air quality when compared to No Project (refer to Section 2.4.2). The results show that the future CO concentration levels with the project are projected to comply with the 1-hour and 8-hour State and Federal standards. Because the project is not projected to impact the local air quality, the project is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the first criterion." (ibid) Regarding Criterion 2, the report states: "Consistency with the AQMP assumptions is determined by performing an analysis of the project with the assumptions in the AQMP. "The AQMP assumptions are based upon projections from local general plans. Projects that are consistent with the local general plans are consistent with the AQMP assumptions. It appears that the growth forecasts for the proposed project, at the project's opening year, are consistent with the SCAG growth forecasts. The forecasts made for the project EIR seem to be based on the same demographics as the AQMP, and therefore, the second criterion is met for consistency with the AQMP." (ibid) Impact: Less than significant impact. 10 b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Short Term Impacts. "Temporary impacts will result from project construction activities. Air pollutants will be emitted by construction equipment and fugitive dust will be generated during on site grading of the site." (ibid, p. 9) "The daily peak emission [of particulates (PM 10)] is estimated to be 1,272 pounds of PM10 are not significant when compared with the total average annual of 416 ton per day of particulate matter currently released in the whole South Coast Air Basin (SCAB)". According to the SCAQMD's CEQA Handbook, PM10 emissions greater than 150 pounds per day should be considered significant. The PM10 emissions generated by the project are projected to be greater than this threshold, and therefore, are considered to be significant." (ibid, p.10) Of the five pollutants generated by employee travel, grading activities, and equipment emissions (CO, ROG, NOx, PM10 and Sox), only PM10 exceeds the SCAQMND standards. Nevertheless, the report concludes: "The project construction emissions are considered to be significant, and therefore, mitigation measures for short-term construction are recommended." (ibid, p. 11: see also Table 5 of the report) Long Term Impacts Local Air Quality Impacts: "The future CO [Carbon Monoxide] emissions are projected to be in compliance with the 1-hor and 8-hour state and federal standards, and therefore, the local CO impacts due to the project are not considered to be significant. The project will not result in a significant local air quality impact. No mitigation is required." (ibid, p.19. See also Table 6 of report). Regional Emissions: "The primary source of regional emissions generated by the proposed project will be for space heating and the generation of electricity. Emissions will also be generated by the use of natural gas and oil for the generation of electricity off -site." (ibid, p.14) "The traffic study indicates that the project results in a net change in land uses. The existing approved land uses for the project site is 375 residential units and 32,100 square feet of commercial uses, resulting in a traffic generation of 6,862 daily trips. Thus, the proposed project results in a net decrease of 3,570 daily trips." (ibid, p. 15) Table 8 of the report compares emissions projected for the proposed land use with the emissions projected for the land use the current zoning would permit. The 11 proposed land use emissions are one-half or less in all five measured categories. Nevertheless, CO and NOx emissions still exceed SCAQMD's thresholds and therefore the report concludes: "However, since the project emissions are above the significant thresholds for CO and NOx, the project will result in a significant regional air quality impact. Long-term mitigation measures are recommended in Section 3.0." (ibid, p. 16) Mitigation Measures: Short Term Impacts Mitigation Measures (ibid p.18): • Prior to the granting of the first grading permit, the applicant shall submit appropriate permits from SCAQMD indicating compliance with the measures contained in Table 1 and Table 3 of SCAQMD Rule 403 (see Appendix B). To reduce construction equipment emissions, the following measures should be implemented when feasible and be included in grading and improvement plans specifications for implementation by contractors (ibid p. 18): • Use low emission mobile construction equipment. • Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them tuned. • Turn off equipment when not in use. Avoid idling of more than 80 minutes. • Use low sulfur fuel for stationary construction equipment. This is required by SCAQMD Rules 431.1 and 431.2. • Utilize existing power sources (i.e., power poles) when feasible. This measure would minimize the use of higher polluting gas or diesel generators. • Configure construction parking to minimize traffic interference. • Minimize obstruction of through -traffic lanes. When feasible, construction should be planned so that lane closures on existing streets are kept to a minimum. • Schedule construction operations affecting traffic for off-peak hours. • Limit the application of architectural surface treatments during any one day, as feasible. • Develop a traffic plan to minimize traffic flow interference from construction activities (the plan may include advance public notice of routing, use of public transportation and satellite parking areas with a shuttle service). 12 Long Term Impacts Mitigation Measures: The following measures should be implemented or included in the Specific Plan implementation as feasible: • Provide dedicated turn lanes as appropriate and provide roadway improvements at heavily congested roadways. • Include residential design features that encourage trip elimination or trip diversion to alternative transportation, such as pre -wiring for 220V electric charging systems. • Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. Reduce the need to heat or cool structures by improving thermal integrity will result in a reduced expenditure of energy and a reduction in pollutant emissions. • Install energy efficient street lighting. • Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous sources MSC-01 measure. This measure reduces the need for cooling energy in the summer. • Synchronize traffic signals. The areas where this measure would be applicable are roadway intersections within the project area. This measure would be more effective if the roadways beyond the project limits are synchronized as well. • Solar heaters and central water heaters shall be encouraged for residential uses. • Provide increased insulation beyond Title 24 requirements. • Use all -electric landscape maintenance equipment. • Orient buildings North -South, as feasible. • Improve the walking environment by providing complete sidewalks, street trees, traffic -calming and signals, safe and visually interesting pedestrian walkways, and provide interconnected bikeways/bike lanes. • Use double -paned windows to reduce thermal loss. • Install energy -efficient appliances to reduce energy consumption. Impact: Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. 13 c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? See above. Impact: Less than significant. d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? No. The emissions associated with the proposed project are not considered "substantial". What emissions are generated will be mitigated by the measures listed above. Impact: Less than significant. e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? No. The implementation of the project would not involve the handling of large quantities of solid waste materials, chemicals, food products, or other odorous materials. During construction, there may be localized when odor is noticeable from construction equipment or asphalt paving, but such transitory exposure would not threaten regional air quality standards, and would be less than significant. Impact: Less than significant. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? "The prior history of agricultural land use and other development on much of the site has resulted in the conversion of native vegetation types to row crops and fields." (1, p. 4). Accordingly, no biological resources were found on the subject site. Due to the presence of trees on a portion of the site, a survey for Nesting Raptors in the appropriate season was recommended. This survey was conducted on April 6 and April 14, 2004. One active raptor nest was present, belonging to a pair of red- tailed hawks. Also noted were two active American crow nests. (4) Impact: No impact. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? 14 No riparian habitat exists on the project site (1). Impact: No impact. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No wetlands exist on the project site (1). Impact: No impact. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? A portion of the project site falls within a criteria area boundary of the County's MSHCP plan (cell 2666). A meeting with Julie Greene of the Riverside County Planning Department on September 9, 2004 resulted in a determination that the area of interest in this cell was north of the property on the other side of the San Jacinto River levee. By letter dated December 6, 2004, the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) confirmed this finding. See Appendix C, MSHCP documents. The County's cell criteria requests surveys for the burrowing owl. This survey was conducted on April 6 and 14, 2004. No burrowing owls were observed. (2). Impact: no impact. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? The City does not have a tree preservation policy or ordinance .cor other ordinances or policies that would be applicable to this project. Impact: No impact. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? A portion of the site lies within a criteria cell of the County's MSHCP plan. The City has completed its HANS review and consulted with the County. A summary of the results of the consultation, per RCA JPR Review documents dated 11/11/2004 is as follows (see also Appendix C): 15 "Reserve Assembly activities in this area are anticipated to be focused on areas north of the existing levee along the Upper San Jacinto River. The project site is located south of the existing levee. The portion of Ce11 2674 within which the project site is located is therefore not a primary focus of Reserve Assembly and development of the site as proposed would not conflict with MSHCP Reserve Assembly goals." Regardless of the status in the MSHCP plan, every project pays a MSHCP fee of $1,651 per dwelling unit. Mitigation Measures (nesting Raptors): • No earlier that 45 days and no later than 20 days prior to construction or grading/site preparation activities that would occur during the nesting/breeding season of native bird species potentially nesting on the site (typically February through June), the applicant shall have a survey conducted by a qualified biologist to determine if active raptor nests protected by the California Fish and Game Code are present in the construction zone or within 200 feet of the construction zone. A report of this field survey shall be submitted to the appropriate agency. Construction can proceed if no active nests are located during this survey. If an active nest is found during the survey, a 500-foot (this distance may be varied depending on the bird species and construction activity, as determined by the biologist) fence barrier (subject to the review and approval of a qualified biologist) shall be erected around the nest site and clearing and construction within the fenced area shall be postponed or halted, at the discretion of the biologist monitor, until the nest is vacated and juveniles have fledged, as determined by the biologist, and there is no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. The biologist shall serve as a construction monitor during those periods when construction activities shall occur near active nests to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests shall occur. Impact: Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? See d) below. b) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? See d) below. c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? 16 No potentially significant cultural resources were identified within the project area. The Phase one Cultural Resources Assessment conducted for the project site reports that a records search by the Eastern Information Center at the University of California, Riverside indicated that one resource had been previously recorded within the project area — the circa 1957 Raymar Dairy milking barn. However, a recent field survey found that the building had been demolished. The records search indicated this structure was recorded in 1982 and a description of the barn noted that an older house built in 1938 had already been demolished. (5) The report concludes that: "Any subsurface materials related to the dairy operation or the earlier 1938 residence would not represent potentially significant archaeological deposits because 1) materials from the two periods would likely have been intermixed by mechanical demolition of structures and would have lost archeological integrity, and 2) more importantly, the 1938-1957 period in San Jacinto is not early enough to provide important new information about the community's formative are of approximately 1869-1888 — a period for which documentary data is probably scarce and would thus be more amenable to questions addressed through archaeological research." (ibid, p. 11) The report continues: "The presence of significant subsurface archaeological resources is always a possibility in areas where only surface inspection has taken place." (ibid) The report recommends the following mitigation measure: Mitigation Measure for Potential Cultural Resources: • If potentially significant archaeological evidence (e.g., stone artifacts, dark ashy soils or burned rocks, or old glass, metal or ceramic artifacts) becomes apparent during ground disturbances, work in that location should be diverted and a qualified archaeologist should be contacted immediately to evaluate the find. The property owner will then be notified if the materials are potentially significant, and the archaeologist may recommend further study. If human remains are discovered, the Riverside County Coroner's Office must be notified immediately under state law, and all activities in the area must cease until lawful measures have been implemented. If the Coroner determines that the remains are prehistoric, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento must also be contacted under state law. The NASC will designate a Most Likely Descendent (MLD) who will have the authority to make procedural determinations concerning disposition of the remains. Impact: No impact. 17 VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? There is no earthquake fault on the subject property per the State of California Special Studies Zones map, San Jacinto Quadrangle, Revised Official Map Effective: January 1, 1980. Impact: No impact. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? The nearest zoned active faults are the San Jacinto -San Jacinto valley Fault, located approximately 2.3 kilometers (1.4 miles) southwest of the site, the San Jacinto-Anza Fault, located 8.0 kilometers (5 miles) to the southeast, and the San Andreas Fault, 23.9 kilometers (14.8 miles) north of the site. (6, p. 2) Design professionals should be aware of the site setting and the potential for earthquake activity during the anticipated life of the structure should be acknowledged. The accelerations that may be experienced on the site should be considered in the design. (ibid, p. 4) Mitigation Measure for Strong Ground Shaking: • The seismic provisions included in the Uniform Building Code for Seismic Zone 4 should be considered the minimum design criteria. Impact: Less than significant. iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? "Based upon the inconsistent condition of the deeper silty sand layers encountered below the present groundwater table, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction occurring at the site is significant." (ibid, p. 4) Mitigation Measures for Potential Liquefaction: • Remedial grading within the proposed building areas include the overexcavation and recompaction of the loose near surface soils as well as the primary foundation bearing soils. (ibid) 18 • The specific recommendations for site preparation found in Appendix D shall be considered required mitigation measures. Impact: Less than significant. iv) Landslides? The site is virtually level and there is no threat of landslides. The closest off -site hillsides that could generate landslides are located on the other side (north of) the San Jacinto River. Impact: No impact. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? The development of the site will include paved roads and sidewalks and building pads developed with single-family residences and urban landscaping. The possibility of soil erosion is minimal. Impact: No impact. c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? See a) above. Impact: No impact. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? "The near surface soils encountered during our investigation were found to be non - expansive. Laboratory testing indicated an Expansion Index of 3 for the surface silty sands that corresponds with the "very low" expansion category in accordance with UBC Table 18-1-B." (ibid, p. 4). Impact: No impact. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste- water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? The project will be served with a public sewer system; septic tanks will not be used. Impact: No impact. VI. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: 19 a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No blasting is required for site grading or preparation, so no explosives for ground work will be employed. Construction of the proposed project will involve the transport and use of some hazardous materials in the construction and maintenance of roads, buildings and other facilities. Although the potential for accidental spills exists, a probable event is unlikely and considered less than significant due to the minor amounts of hazardous materials used. In addition, any materials used or spilled during construction -related activities will normally occur away from the general public, thus allowing effective clean-up. The likelihood of hazardous material use or spills is further reduced due to the residential nature of the project. Impact: No impact. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiles pursuant to Government Code section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? The site is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Impact: No impact. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? The project is not located within an airport land use map or within two miles of any airport. or within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Impact: No impact. f) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? The project is not located in the vicinity of a private airstrip. Impact: No impact. 20 g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? The project will not impair or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The County Fire Department is responsible for implementing an emergency response plan or evacuation plan. The City does not have specific evacuation routes other than identification of major routes leading out of the valley. The route of choice for this project would be the adjacent Ramona Expressway. The project has two access -ways to the expressway. Impact: No impact. h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? The project site is surrounded by urban land uses and agricultural uses and the San Jacinto River. The site will eventually further be separated from any wildlands to the north by the proposed San Jacinto River levee. Impact: No impact. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? The project site ultimately drains into the San Jacinto River. During the grading and construction phase of the development, the project will comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activity, which requires the developer to file a Notice of Intent with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and prepare and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for construction activities on one acre or more. The SWPPP identifies erosion, sedimentation and stormwater pollution control measures that will be implemented during construction activities, and seeks to minimize the discharge of pollutants into the stormwater and existing drainage channels to the maximum extent practicable. In the developed condition, low flow runoff will be directed into the project's detention basin located at the northwest corner of the site. The project's drainage will be conveyed through the development's storm drain system to the flood control channel located along the site's westerly boundary. Prior to discharge into the flood control channel, low flow runoff will be diverted into a low flow storm drain system to transport the first flush runoff to the detention basin. This will allow for the settlement of debris and loose soils that enter the stormwater system and will prevent pollutants from entering off -site drainage channels and the San Jacinto River. As currently designed per the project's hydrology analysis, the detention basin has capacity to hold 19.16 acre feet, which is well over the 2.51 acre feet basin volume needed to treat the development's first flush. (7) 21 Mitigation: See mitigation measures following j). Impact: Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? No groundwater wells are proposed on -site. Eastern Municipal Water District has indicated in their will -serve letter that the district's system has adequate supply to serve the development. Therefore, the project will not substantially deplete ground water supplies. (8) Impact: No impact. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? The development has been designed to mimic existing drainage patterns for the project site. As with the existing sheet flow condition, in the developed condition drainage will be conveyed to the northwest corner of the site via the project's storm drain system in the same general flow direction of southeast to northwest. The project's detention basin has been designed to accommodate the 100-year one -hour storm runoff volume of 1.5 acre-feet, so as to maintain offsite flows at existing conditions. Therefore, no increase in runoff volume will occur off -site that may impact off -site drainage channels or the San Jacinto River. Consequently, the project will not alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or the area in a manner that will result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site. (7) Impact: No impact. d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off -site? Development of the project site will change the existing hydrology of the site through the addition of impervious surface (buildings, roads, driveways, sidewalks, etc.), resulting in increases in runoff volumes and the reduction in ground percolation. Drainage from the development areas will be conveyed along curbs, gutters and the project's storm drain system and directed to the project's detention basin. The detention basin will maintain off -site runoff flow volume and velocity at existing conditions. Changes in drainage pattern will be minor and internal to the site and will not affect the regional hydrology, or the drainage flows in the surrounding area. No changes in flows are expected within adjacent rivers, streams 22 for channels. The project's detention basin, which is located in the large community park in the northwest corner of the development, will function to retain the difference in flow from the existing to the proposed condition. Therefore, no increase in runoff volume will occur on -site. Consequently, the project will not substantially increase the rate or the amount of surface runoff in a manner that will result in flooding on- or off -site. (ibid) Since a portion of the project site is located within the 100-year floodplain, the project site will be filled by as much as 16 feet to remove the residential lots out of the base flood elevation with the development's proposed grading. The developer will need to obtain a permit from the Federal Emergency Management Agency through a Conditional Letter of Map Revision {CLOMR-F} to the flood Insurance Rate Maps to allow for the development of residential structures within a know floodplain. The development will also need to comply with the City of San Jacinto's Floodplain Management Ordinance. Thus, future residential development on the site will no longer be located within the 100-year flood hazard zone with the project's proposed grading. (ibid) Mitigation: See mitigation measures following j). Impact: Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. e) Create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? The City of San Jacinto has a local drainage problem created by the levee for the San Jacinto River. While the levee contains the San Jacinto River from flooding the San Jacinto valley in large storm events, it also prevents local drainage from the San Jacinto valley, which is tributary to the San Jacinto River, from discharging into the river. Consequently, drainage in the project vicinity already exceeds the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems. To mitigate the local drainage issue, as part of the proposed development, a flood control channel, Line J of the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) San Jacinto Area Master Plan of Drainage, will be constructed to convey the local drainage from the off -site tributary areas to the southeast of the project site to the San Jacinto River for discharge. The project's detention basin and low flow storm drain system will allow for the settlement of debris and loose soils that enter the stormwater system and will prevent pollutants from entering off -site drainage channels and the San Jacinto River. With the construction of the flood control channel and the project's detention basin, development of the proposed project will ensure that on- and off -site runoff will not exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of pollutant runoff. (ibid) Mitigation: See mitigation measures following j. Impact: Less than significant with mitigation measures incorporated. 23 f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? No. See above. Impact: No impact. g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? A portion of the project site is located within the 100-year floodplain. To remove the residential lots out of the base flood elevation the project site will be filled by as much as 16 feet with the development's grading design. The developer will need to obtain a permit from the Federal Emergency Management Agency through a Conditional Letter of Map Revision {CLOMR-F} to the flood Insurance Rate Maps to allow for the development of residential structures within a know floodplain. The development will also need to comply with the City of San Jacinto's Floodplain Management Ordinance. Thus, future residential development on the site will no longer be located within the 100-year flood hazard area with the project's proposed grading. Mitigation: See mitigation measures following j). Impact: Less than significant with mitigation measures incorporated. h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? See above. Mitigation: See mitigation measures following j). Impact: Less than significant with mitigation measures incorporated. i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? The project site is located just south of the levee for the San Jacinto River and the project could expose people or structures to a significant risk of Toss, injury or death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a levee. However, to ensure that people or structures are not exposed to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a levee the project site will be graded so that residential lots are raised above the base flood elevation for the San Jacinto River floodplain. To remove the residential lots out of the base flood elevation the project site will be filled by as much as 16 feet with the development's grading design. The developer will need to obtain a permit from the Federal Emergency 24 j) Management Agency through a Conditional Letter of Map Revision {CLOMR-F} to the flood Insurance Rate Maps to allow for the development of residential structures within a know floodplain. The development will also need to comply with the City of San Jacinto's Floodplain Management Ordinance. With the implementation of the project's grading the possibility that the project could expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding as a result of the failure of a levee is mitigated to the level of less than significant. Mitigation: See mitigation measures following j). Impact: Less than significant with mitigation measures incorporated Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? The project is not located near a body of water; therefore is not threatened by the possibility of seiche or tsunami phenomenon. Nor is the project in close proximity to any hillside areas subjecting it to threat of mudflows. Impact: No impact. Mitigation Measures for Hydrology and Water Quality: • Prior to any permits, the project will comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activity. A Notice of Intent shall be filed with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared and implemented. • Prior to any permits, the developer shall obtain a permit from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) through a Conditional Letter of Map Revision {CLOMR-F} to the flood Insurance Rate Maps to allow for the development of residential structures within a known floodplain. The development shall also comply with the City of San Jacinto's Floodplain Management Ordinance. • Prior to issuance of building permits, a CLOMOR shall be secured, and prior to issuance of occupancy permits, a LOMAR shall be secured. • A storm drain system, approved by the City Engineer, shall be developed to transport the first flush runoff to a detention basin adequate to allow for the settlement of debris and loose soils that enter the stormwater system and prevent pollutants from entering off -site drainage channels and the San Jacinto River. Said detention basin shall be designed so that no increase in runoff will occur offsite. 25 IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? The project will not physically divide an established community. The proposed project represents an extension of the existing urban development to the south and west. Impact: No impact. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? The applications filed for this project include a request for a General Plan Amendment to add the two parcels proposed for annexation to the General Plan, and to delete San Jacinto Avenue from the site as a Collector street. Approval of these two requests will bring the project into conformance with the General Plan. These requests do not involve ordinances or programs "adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating n environmental effect". Impact: No impact. c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? No, see IV d) above. Impact: No impact. X. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Or, b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan or other land use plan? No portion of the Planning area is located in a significant mineral resource area (MRZ-2) as identified on maps prepared by the Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology. The Riverside County General Plan identifies sand and gravel and limestone resources in the eastern portion of the Planning Area, east of the San Jacinto River. Rock and granite products are also located in the eastern hillsides. The proposed project site is not located in these areas. The proposed project site is not located in these areas. (9) Impact: No impact. 26 XI. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? The City's General Plan Noise Element specifies outdoor and indoor noise limits for residential land uses. The limits specified are 65CNEL for exterior noise exposure and 45 CNEL for interior noise exposure. The Noise Assessment prepared for this project has determined that, without mitigation, the first tier of lots north of the Ramona Expressway would be subjected to noise levels between 65 and 70 CNEL. The cumulative noise increase due to the project south of the Ramona Expressway is projected to be 1.4 dBA, which is considered to be no impact. The most significant cumulative noise increase will be along Alessandro Avenue; however even with the increase, the noise level will be below the 65CNEL threshold. The report states a six-foot high noise barrier should be required. The applicants propose a six-foot high masonry wall along the Ramona Expressway frontage and a 35 foot -wide landscape setback. The lots along the Expressway are also proposed to be graded such that they will be slightly below the level of the roadway. The report also suggests that any second story balconies facing the Ramona Expressway should have noise barriers. The report concludes a future noise analysis be performed prior to building permits. Since CEQA does not allow mitigation to be a future study, mitigation measures are proposed below. Mitigation Measures: • To reduce the potential level of impact due to traffic noise along the Ramona Expressway, a six foot -high solid masonry wall shall be erected along the Ramona Expressway frontage. (10) • Second -story balconies should not be constructed on those residences adjacent to the Expressway. • Appropriate HVAC mechanical shall be provided to achieve a "windows closed" condition for those residences adjacent to the Expressway. Impact: Less than significant with mitigation measures incorporated. b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? The project will not generate groundborne vibrations or groundborne noise. Impact: No impact. 27 c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? See a) above. Impact: Less than significant with mitigation measures incorporated per a) above. d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Construction activity will be a source of a temporary noise increase in the area of the project. The Noise Assessment report cited above states the following: "Worst -case examples of construction noise at 50 feet are presented in Exhibit 4 [ibid, page 8]. The peak noise level for most of the equipment that will be used during the construction is 70 to 95 dBA at a distance of 50 feet. At 200 feet, the peak construction noise levels range from 58 to 83 dBA. At 400 feet the peak noise levels range from 52 to 77 dBA. Note that these noise levels are based upon worst -case conditions. Typically, noise levels near the site will be less. Noise measurements made by Mestre Greve Associates for other projects show that the noise levels generated by commonly used grading equipment (i.e. loaders, graders and trucks) generate noise levels that typically do not exceed the middle of the range shown in Exhibit 4. "The nearest existing homes are located [west] of the project site. These homes will be separated from the project site by a proposed flood control channel of approximately 65 feet wide. The nearest residences are estimated to be located approximately 70 feet from the potential construction area. Based on this worst -case distance, the nearest residence may experience worst case unmitigated peak construction noise levels between 67 and 92dBA. However, actual construction noise on -site is more subdued. The average noise levels are typically 5 to 15 dBA lower than the peak noise levels. Therefore, the closest homes could experience average noise between 55 and 87 dBA. "Grading activities typically represent one of the highest potential sources for noise impacts. If problems arise, the most effective method of controlling construction noise is through local control of construction hours. The City of San Jacinto constriction hours are permitted between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m., and not at any time on Sunday." Mitigation Measure: • Construction activity shall be limited to the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. Mondays through Saturdays, with no construction permitted on Sundays. 28 Impact: Less than significant. d) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Or, f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The project is not located within an airport land use plan, within two miles of a public or public use airport, or within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Impact: No impact. XI. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of road or other infrastructure)? The project proposes to develop 339 single family homes on 96.8 gross acres, for a density of 3.5 residences per acre. That portion of the project that is within the City is Master -planned for Low Density Residential up to 5 dwelling units per acre, and is zoned R-1 for single family residences. Therefore, the population growth generated by the proposed project will be less than that permitted and anticipated by the General Plan. The 16.56 acres proposed to be annexed into the City will be added to the General Plan, similarly designated for Low Density Residential and pre -zoned R-1 consistent with that designation and the balance of the project. That portion of the project currently within the City (80.24 acres) is consistent with the City's General Plan, and the impacts of such development were considered when the General Plan was approved. The 80.24 acres at 5 DU per acre could generate 401 dwelling units, more than the project proposes with the additional 16.56 acres proposed to be annexed. That portion being added to the General Plan is in the City's Sphere of Influence. The maximum number of residences that could be added to these 16.56 acres with the designations cited above would be 83. That area of the project proposes approximately 46 residences (the precise number is difficult to quantify precisely because the proposed lots do not coincide with the boundaries of the parcels. However, neither number (83 or 46) is considered to have the propensity to "induce substantial population growth in the area". The project will be conditioned to pay all impact and mitigation fees. Impact: Less than significant. 29 b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Or, c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? The project will not displace substantial numbers of existing housing or people. Impact: No impact. XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the project: a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire Protection: Existing fire stations serving the project site are: San Jacinto #25, 132 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto (approximately one mile due south of the project site); Little Lake #26, 25954 Stanford Street; Valle Vista #72, 25175 Fairview Avenue. All are operated by the Riverside County Fire Department, and each would respond with a Type I fire engine with staffing of 3 per unit. Additional equipment would respond from Beaumont City #66, Beaumont #20, and Nuevo #3. The proposed site for this project would be classified as Category 2, Urban, requiring a fire station within 3 miles and receipt of a "first alarm" assignment on scene within 15 minutes. Based on national fire standards, one new fire station and/or engine company could be required for every 2,000 dwelling units, or 3.5 million square feet of commercial/industrial occupancy. Given this project's development plan, up to 1 fire station may be needed to meet anticipated service demands. The proposed project will have a cumulative adverse impact on the Fire Department's ability to provide an acceptable level of service. These impacts include an increased number of emergency and public service calls to the increased presence of structures and population. The project proponents/developers shall participate in a Development Impact Fee Program as adopted by the City of San Jacinto. This will provide funding for capitol improvements such as land, equipment purchases, and fire station construction. (11) 30 Police Protection: Police protection is provided by the Riverside County Sheriffs Department. The San Jacinto Sheriff's station is located at 160 W. Sixth Street, approximately one and one - quarter mile directly south of the project site. There are currently 29 officers at this station. Services provided by the Sheriff's Department include police patrol, traffic enforcement, investigation, bicycle patrol, canine team, Allied Riverside Cities Narcotics Enforcement Team (ARCNET), police explorers, citizen volunteers, school resource officers, and neighborhood watch. The current standard for law enforcement is 1.0 sworn officers per 1,000 residents. Given the City's current population of 26,724, the existing service level is 1.1 officers per thousand residents, slightly above the standard. Based on the city's census population of 2.918 persons per household, the 339 proposed dwelling units would yield a population of 980 persons, requiring approximately 1 officer. (Source: interview with Sgt. Leonard Purvis, February 15, 2005) Mitigation of Fire and Police service impacts: The City has created CFD 2003-1 as a mitigation measure for impacts on Fire and Police services. Annexation to CFD 2003-1 requires a one-time payment of (currently) $612 per dwelling unit prior to building permits. Thereafter, homeowners pay (currently) $350 annually. The City has also adopted a development fee schedule that requires a Fire Station Mitigation Fee of (currently) $577 per dwelling unit, a Public Safety Structures Fee of (currently) $50 per dwelling unit, and a Public Safety Equipment Fee of (currently) $10 per dwelling unit, all payable prior to final inspection, for a total of $637 per dwelling unit. Based upon the above fees, the 339 dwelling units proposed for this project would pay an initial CFD 2003-1 fee of $207,468, one-time mitigation fees of $215,943, and an on- going yearly tax of $118,650. Mitigation measure for Fire and Police Services: • The applicant/developer shall annex to CFD 2003-1 and pay the one-time fee of $612 per dwelling unit at building permit issuance, and the mitigation fees of $637 per dwelling unit prior to final inspection. Impact: Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. School Services: The project site is in the San Jacinto Unified School District. Students from this development would attend the Record elementary school, the Monte Vista middle school, and the San Jacinto high school. The school district has issued a "will -serve" letter (Appendix G). 31 The state legislature has determined that payment of school mitigation fees is appropriate mitigation. Currently, the San Jacinto School District collects $2.88 per square foot for single family residences. Mitigation measure for School Service: Proof of payment of school mitigation fees prior to issuance of building permits. Impact: Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Parks: The City of San Jacinto and the Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District provide park and recreational services for the City. To ensure adequate park and recreation facilities, the City has established a parkland standard of five acres per 1,000 residents. The 989 residents projected for the proposed project would thus generate a need for 4.9 acres of parkland. The project includes one park of 3.9 acres, and a second park of 1.5 acres for a total of 5.4 acres, exceeding the requirement of 4.9 acres. The City's Development Fee Schedule includes a Park Fee that is based on the appraised value of the project. The assessment is required at the time of the final map. Credit is given towards the park fee for unencumbered parkland dedicated to the City (unencumbered meaning not part of a detention basin, for example). Additionally, the Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District is a taxing agency with a current tax rate of $0.0137 per tax dollar. Mitigation measure for Parks: • Payment of park fee and/or dedication of parkland as required. Impact: Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Other Public services: Libraries: The Riverside County Library System provides library services to the City and the project area. The San Jacinto branch library is located at 500 Idyllwild Drive, approximately 1.5 miles south of the project site. The Mount San Jacinto Community College, located directly west of the project site, also has a library on -site. Development of the proposed project would result in an increased demand for library services. The library services provided by the County are funded by a "County Fee Library" tax currently $0.023 per $1,000 of assessed property value. Payment of property taxes would provide funds for continued library services. Impact: Less than significant. 32 City administration: The City provides a full range of administrative services not covered by the above categories but considered to be general administration services such as building, planning, engineering, code enforcement, etc. The City's basic tax rate, as established by Proposition 13, is 1% per $1,000 assessed value. In addition, the City has adopted a variety of impact fees, including: a Public Buildings fee of $65 per acre, a Building Permit Surcharge fee of 1% of the total permit fee, a Current Planning fee of $50 per dwelling unit, and a Advanced Planning fee of $150 per dwelling unit, all payable prior to final inspection. Mitigation for other Public Services: • Payment of mitigation fees as adopted by the City prior to final inspection. Impact: Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. XIV. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? The City and Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District provide approximately 52 acres of recreational facilities in the City. The City maintains five parks: Salllee Park, Rancho Park, Mistletoe Park, Druding Park, and Hoffman Park. Valley -Wide maintains the 36-acre Valley -Wide Regional Park with a 22,000 square foot sports center and other facilities. The unimproved San Jacinto River Park and the Mount San Jacinto State Park are also within the City's sphere of influence. There are also two private golf courses in the City: the Golden Era Golf Course and the Soboba Springs Golf Course. The project itself proposes two neighborhood parks, one of 3.9 acres, and a second park of 1.5 acres for a total of 5.4 acres. The two parks exceed the City's requirement of 5 acres per 1,000 population. Future residents will use other City and Valley -Wide facilities; however, the City's Development Fee Schedule includes a Park Fee that is based on the appraised value of the project. The assessment is required at the time of the final map. Credit is given towards the park fee for unencumbered parkland dedicated to the City (unencumbered meaning not part of a detention basin, for example). Additionally, the Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District is a taxing agency with a tax rate of approximately $0.0137 per tax dollar. Mitigation measure for Parks: • Payment of park fee and/or dedication of parkland as required. Impact: Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. 33 b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (Le., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? A Traffic Impact Study was prepared for this project. The findings of the report are as follows: • "The study area intersections are currently operating at Level of Service D or better during peak hour conditions. "The proposed development is projected to generate approximately 3,292 trip - ends per day with 258 vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 347 vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour. The proposed project would generate 3,570 less trip -ends per day with 105 less vehicles per hour during the AM peak hour and 331 less vehicles per hour during the PM peak hour than the existing zoned land uses. "During existing plus project conditions, all study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of service D or better during peak hours with the exception of the intersection of San Jacinto Avenue at Ramona Expressway, which is projected to operate at an unsatisfactory level of service. "During Project Buildout (Year 2007) Without Project conditions, all study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service D or better with the exception of the intersections of San Jacinto Avenue at Ramona Expressway and Alessandro Avenue at Ramona Expressway, which are projected to operate at an unsatisfactory level of service. "During Project Buildout (Year 2007) Plus Project conditions, all study area intersections are projected to continue to operate at Level of Service D or better with the exception of the intersections of San Jacinto Avenue at Ramona Expressway and Alessandro Avenue at Ramona Expressway, which are projected to operate at an unsatisfactory level of service. However, with the implementation of recommended improvements included in Table 7, all study area intersections are projected to improve to Level of Service D or better during peak hour conditions." "The internal circulation provided on the site plan is adequate to meet City of San Jacinto standards if the recommendations included in this report are implemented. 34 "The project should contribute towards intersection improvements based upon the fair -share analysis included in this report or participate in a city-wide fee program if adopted by the City" (12) The project will also pay fees per the adopted Development Fee Schedule as follows, all due prior to final inspection: • A Regional Transportation fee of $820 per acre; • A Traffic Signalization fee of $223.19 per dwelling unit; • A Carpool Mitigation fee of $90 per dwelling unit; and • A Transportation Uniform Mitigation fee (TUMF) of $6,650 per unit. Mitigation Measures: • The recommendations contained in the above -referenced report as shown in Appendix shall be required mitigation measures for the project. (Note: this report apparently was prepared before the existing signal at San Jacinto Avenue and the Expressway was installed. The requirement to install this signal has been modified by the City Engineer's recommended Condition of Approval No. 26 which reads in part: "Existing traffic signal at intersection of "K" and Expressway shall be removed, relocated, and upgraded as required to accommodate proposed improvements.") (City Engineer Memorandum, Engineering Conditions of Approval, dated February 4, 2003) • The applicant/developer shall also pay all required development fees prior to final inspection. Impact: Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? See a) above. Impact: Less than significant with mitigation incorporated as specified above. c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? The project will have no effect on air traffic patterns. Impact: No Impact. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? 35 The project will meet all design standards of the City related to roadway geometrics. The primary access point at the Ramona Expressway is fully signalized and will be upgrade if required for this project. Impact: No impact. e) Result in inadequate emergency access? The project has two access points, one off the Ramona Expressway at San Jacinto Boulevard, and the other off the Ramona Expressway at Alessandro Avenue. Interior circulation meets all engineering and Fire Department standards and requirements as to widths of streets, turning radii, length of cul-de-sacs, etc. During construction, full emergency access is required to be maintained. Impact: No impact. f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Each dwelling unit will have a least a two -car garage as required by the City's zoning ordinance. Additional parking will be provided at the primary park site, and street parking will be available at the smaller park site. The PUD ordinance uniquely requires RV storage be provided on each lot or in a compound with spaces equal to one space for each ten dwellings. The 393 proposed dwelling units would thus each need to provide at least one ten foot wide side yard, or a parking lot would need to be developed for 39 RV parking spaces. The applicants have filed a variance to be relieved of this requirement, proposing that 124 of the 393 lots will have RV storage availability, exceeding the 39 separate parking spaces this requirement would otherwise require. The Planning Commission and the City Council will need to consider this request; however, for the purposes of this analysis, the project would in any case exceed the ordinance requirements and would not result in inadequate parking capacity. Impact: No impact. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? The Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) has reviewed the proposed development and has offered the following comments: "The residential lots are low -to -medium —density and the tract's interior circulation patterns are satisfactory, providing suitable pedestrian access to transit that uses the Expressway." "Three RTA bus routes currently serve the general vicinity and additional local transit is contemplated in the future for the Expressway." 36 "To improve safety, convenience and accessibility of transit service relative to this project, RTA staff will recommend the lead agency to require a bus turnout at the following location: Installation of an RTA-standard, ADA-compliant bus turnout along the westbound (north side of) Ramona Expwy, just west of the intersection with "K" St. and San Jacinto Ave. and approximately behind lots 103-105." (13) The same circulation pattern deemed satisfactory by the RTA to allow residents to reach bus service on the Expressway will also allow residents access to walk or bike to nearby commercial services, the local school or the community college as alternative modes of transportation. Impact: No impact. XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Wastewater generated by the residential units would require disposal into the public sewer system operated and maintained by the City. Wastewater directed to the storm drain system would be directed to an on -site detention basin. Sewer effluent will be treated at the Hemet/San Jacinto Wastewater Treatment plant, which meets RWQCB standards for sewage treatment. The project will be required to comply with NPDES and SWPPP requirements and the City's and EMWD's standards, and pay the City Sewer fee of $200 per dwelling unit prior to final occupancy. Mitigation Measures for wastewater treatment: • Compliance with NPDES and SWPPP requirements, City and EMWD standards. • Payment of the City Sewer fee of $200 per dwelling unit prior to final occupancy. Impact: Less than significant with mitigation incorporated. b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Using EMWD factors, sewage generation is estimated at 100 gallons per person per day, or a total of 98,900 gallons. Water demand is estimated at 200 gallons per day per person, or 197,800 gallons. EMWD has issued a will -serve letter for the project, dated June 8, 2004. Impact: Less than significant. 37 c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? The applicant/developer will be required to construct a proposed open flood control channel (Line "J") from an existing upstream point approximately 300 feet south of the Ramona Expressway through the project, and connect with the San Jacinto River if approved by the Riverside County Flood Control District, or as approved by the City Engineer, with some reimbursement for off -site construction as approved by the City. Modification of this requirement may be allowed by the City Council. The impacts of this construction are included in impacts considered for the project as a whole, and all discharges into the channel and ultimately into the river will be required to meet NPDES, SWPPP and Riverside County Flood Control requirements as specified above. Impact: Less than significant. d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? In making this determination, the City shall consider whether the project is subject to the water supply assessment requirements of Water Code Section 10910, et. seq. (SB 610), and the requirements of Government Code Section 664737 (SB 221). The number of units proposed by this project fall below the threshold requiring a Water Supply Assessment Report, and EMWD has issued a will -serve letter for the project. Impact: Less than significant. e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? EMWD has issued a SAN53 "will -serve" for water and/or sewer. While the City will provide sewer service, EMWD's wastewater treatment plant will be the recipient of the effluent. EMWD reports that they will serve the project and have adequate capacity to do so or will provide the needed capacity. (14) f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? The proposed development would generate solid wastes that would require landfill capacity at Lamb Canyon Sanitary Landfill. Based on the 1995 Refuse Collection Review prepared by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health, residential developments generate 10.3 pounds per day, or 1.88 tons per year. Thus, 38 g) the proposed 339 residences would generate 3,492 pounds per day, or 637 tons per year. Currently there is capacity at the landfill to serve the waste disposal needs of the project. The City provides household recycling services along with public education programs on waste reduction. The proposed project would participate in household waste recycling as part of the regular collection service. The proposed project would also generate household hazardous wastes that would need to be disposed at landfills accepting these wastes. The Riverside County Department of Environmental Health operates a household hazardous waste mobile collection program, which holds annual collection events at various locations. These events are advertised, and information is available from the County and the City. Normal household operations are not expected to generate hazardous wastes in excess of what would be served by this program. Impact: Less than significant. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Standards are set which the City must attain. In order to do so, the City and the County have developed a series of programs that will be available to the residents of the proposed project. These include: • Residential curbside recycling • Public education programs • Mobile collection programs • Backyard composting programs • Christmas tree recycling • Green Waste programs • County landfill programs to accept woody waste, white goods and metallic dixcards • Hazardous waste disposal • Household hazardous waste collection sites. Participation in these programs will comply with the applicable regulations. Impact: Less than significant XVI. MADATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE CEQA Section 15065 requires that the following issues be addressed: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat or a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? 39 b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project, and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? If the answer to any of the above is "yes", it is mandatory that an EIR be prepared. On the basis of the analysis herein, there are several impacts that are classified as "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated" but none that, with recommended mitigation measures, are classified as "Potentially Significant Impact" and thus requiring an EIR. 40 NOTES 1. Biological Constraints Survey with Vegetative Mapping for the approximate 97- Acre Western Village Site in San Jacinto, Riverside County, California. BonTerra Consulting, March 8, 2004. 2. Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment: Tentative Tract No. 32376, Western Village, San Jacinto, Riverside County, California. BonTerra Consulting, April 21, 2004. 3. Air Quality Assessment for: Western Village Tentative Tract 32376 City of San Jacinto. Mestre Greve Associates, November 16, 2004. 4. Results of Surveys for Nesting Raptors and Burrowing Owls on the Approximately 97-Acre Western Village Site in San Jacinto, Riverside County, California. BonTerra Consulting. July 5, 2004. 5. Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment: Tentative Tract No. 32376, Western Village, San Jacinto, Riverside County, California. BonTerra Consulting, April 21, 2004. 6. Geotechnical Investigation Tentative Tract No. 25414 NEC Ramona Expressway & Western Village Drive San Jacinto, CA. Sladden Engineering. December 22, 2003. 2. Hydrology Analysis for Tract 32376. Hunsaker & Associates Irving, Inc. Dated 5- 18-04. 8. Eastern Municipal Water District letter dated June 8, 2004 9. City of San Jacinto Preliminary Draft General Plan Resource Management Element, Cotton/Bridges/Associates, August 2003. 10. Noise Assessment for: Western Village Tentative Tract 32376. Mestre Greve Associates, May 10, 2004 11. Riverside County Fire Department memorandum dated 01-25-2005 12. Western Village (TTM32376) Traffic Impact Study. San Jacinto, California. RK Engineering Group, April 7, 2004. 13. Letter from the RTA dated January 4, 2005 14. Interview with Brian Raines, P.E., February 17, 2005 APPENDIX A ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST, FORM"J" ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Project Title: Western Village Planned Unit Development 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of San Jacinto, Development Dept. 248 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 3. Contact Person and Phone Number John Freiman, AICP (951) 487-7330 4. Project Location: North side of Ramona expressway opposite the extension of San Jacinto Ave. in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Silverstone Development Co. 245 Fischer Ave, Suite B-4 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 6. General Plan Designation: Low Density Residential and proposed Low Density Residential; and County Rural Residential, 0.2 du/ac. 7 Zoning: City W-2 and R-1; County RA-5 8. Description of Project Proposed 339 lot single family residential Planned Unit Development with two park sites and a detention basin on 96.8 gross acres; a zone change to add a PUD overlay; a pre -zone change from County RA-5 to R-1; annexation of two parcels totaling 16.56 acres; a General Plan Amendment to add the proposed annexation area to the general Plan and to delete San Jacinto Avenue as a collector street north of the Ramona Expressway; and a Tentative Tract Map. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings.) Vacant land and San Jacinto River levee to the north; single family tract and mobile home park to the west; plant nursery, vacant land and rural residential to the east; and vacant lands and rural residential to the south. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Biological Resources El Hazards & Hazardous Materials ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Public Services E Utilities / Service Systems ❑ Agriculture Resources El Cultural Resources ❑ Hydrology / Water Quality ❑ Noise ❑ Recreation O Mandatory Findings of Significance X Air Quality O Geology / Soils O Land Use / Planning ❑ Population / Housing X Transportation / Traffic DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency): On the basis of this initial evaluation: ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. O I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. O I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are i loosed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signatt)a e L Date ' Jo Freiman AICP 47 45— City of San Jacinto Prifited Name For Issues: I. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact X X ❑ X o X ❑ ❑ a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ❑ ❑ ❑ X Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ❑ ❑ X ❑ Williamson Act contract? Issues: Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Impact Incorporated Impact c) Involve other changes in the existing environment that, ❑ E E X due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? ❑ X X c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ❑ ❑ X any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian ❑ 0 ❑' X habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Issues: Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No impact Impact Incorporated Impact c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected ❑ ❑ ❑ X wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances ❑ 0 ❑ X protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ❑ ❑ ❑ X Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: ❑ X ❑ X ❑ X ❑ ❑ X ❑ ❑ Chairperson's Agenda REGULAR MEETING of the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO MAY 5, 2005 Immediately Following the Regular City Council Meeting San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS None 3. PUBLIC HEARING: Now is the time for the public to address the Agency on any subject not listed on the agenda. Any person may address the Agency on any subject pertaining to Redevelopment Agency business not listed on the Agenda during this portion of the Meeting. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the Agency Directors. 4. CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by Agency Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the Redevelopment Agency, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. Any agenda item pulled will be heard at the end of 5. City Departments. Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Agency Chairman; state their name, address and the consent calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. None 5. CITY DEPARTMENTS 5.1 Resolution No. / A Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto Approving the Issuance of its San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005, approving the Form of and Authorizing Execution of a Trust Indenture, Escrow Agreement, Bond Purchase Agreement, and an Official Statement, setting the maximum final terms of the sale of the bonds and making certain determinations relating thereto ❑ CaII on Finance Director Bernie Simon to introduce Bond Counsel for staff report ❑ Call for public comments ❑ Call for Council discussion ❑ Call for motion and vote 6. CHAIRPERSON / MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS None ❑ Recess RDA meeting at pm to open Financing Authority Meeting ❑ Reconvene RDA meeting at into closed session. 7 OPEN SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: Park Manor Property (southeast corner of First Street and Estudillo Avenue and southwest corner of First Street and Pico Avenue (APNs 437-023-001, 437-023-002 and 437-023-005) Agency Negotiator: Peter Cosentini, Executive Director Negotiating Parties: San Jacinto Assembly of God Church Under negotiation: Price and terms of payment 8. ADJOURNMENT ❑ Adjourn meeting at pm following motion, second and vote. It is the intention of the City of San Jacinto to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact City Hall at (909) 487-7330, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us ofyourparticular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. If you challenge any action of the City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council (c/o the City Clerk) at, or prior to, the public hearing. Page 2 of 2 MINUTES EETING of the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the CITY OFSAN JACINTO AY 5, 2005 - 9:53 pm, San Jacinto Unifies! School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California ORGANIZATION CaII to Order Chairperson Buydos called the regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City San Jacinto to order at 9:53 p.m. Roll Call Present: Jim Ayres, Chris Buydos, Robert Ritchie, Ken Shaw Absent DaleStubblefield PUBLIC COMMENTS PUBLIC HEARING: None CONSENT CALENDAR None CITY DEPARTMENTS 5.1 Resolution No. RDA 05-01 / A Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of SanJacinto Approving the Issuance of its San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005, approving the Form of and Authorizing Execution of a Trust Indenture, Escrow Agreement, Bond Purchase Agreement, and an Official Statement, setting the maximum final terms of the sale of the bonds and making certain determinations relating thereto / Approve / Finance Director Redevelopment Agency Minutes May 5, 2005 Page 2of3 Finance Director Bernie Simonfirst thanked the team that has been working on these items since January. He then introduced the financing team: _Bond Counsel / Disclosure Counsel Kim Byrens and Mrunal Shah (respectively); Mike Williams from CM De Crinis; Fiscal Consultant Falise Acosta (RSG) who is not present; and Mark Holmstedt our underwriter. Mr. Helmstedt; investment banker, noted that there are three points he would review or the Council: 1)Refinancing the , outstanding tax allocation - bonds saves approximately $20,000 per year. 2) When he brought this issue before the rating agencies financing previously not rated. Because of the great work done by the inance department and team, Standard & Poors rated it an A-. This rating is for a select group of agencies and there are not many in that category. That allowed us to qualify the issue for insurance which caused it to be rated AAA. He recommends Exel Capital Assurances, a triple A rated insurer guarantee this debt and brings the interest rate down a little bit. 3) Mr. Holmstedt added that there, is a new money component utilizing the low and moderate income housing funds as wellas the remaining tax increment to bring approximately $5.5 million net proceeds to be used for housing and other agency issues. If approved tonight it is expected to come to market in about 1 week and a half according to Mr. Holmstedt, Bond Counsel Kim Byrens after greeting the three agencies informed them the indenture is the Agency's document that issues the bonds. The Bonds are then sold thru the purchase contract to the public Financing Authority that. sell them t Mr. Holmstedt's firm who then offers it to the investing public. The proceeds of the bonds comes back to the Agency and are invested with the corporate trustee. She will take a corporation of those proceeds and put them in an escrow trust agreement which ispresented to you tonight. On June 1, 2005 the 1993 bonds will be paid. Ms Byrens _ continued: the other document is the Preliminary Official Statement, which is used to offer the bonds to the investing public. In that document there is a continuing disclosure obligation which is required by security rules and requires you to provide the ongoing information to investors. SIC (Ayres / Buydos) moved to approve all three (Ciity Council, RDA, and Financing Authority were opened and running simultaneously) resolutions simultaneously as presented . Motion carried 4/0. Redevelopment Agency Minutes May 5, 2005 Page 3 of 3 Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Buydos Nays: None Absent: Stubblefield Abstain: None 6. CHAIRPERSON / MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS None Chairperson Buydos recessed the RDA Meeting at 9:58 p.m. and reconvened it in Closed Session at 10:41 p.m. 7. OPEN SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: Park Manor Property (southeast corner of First Street and Estudillo Avenue and southwest corner of First Street and Pico Avenue (APNs 437-023-001, 437-023-002 and 437-023-005) Agency Negotiator: Negotiating Parties: Under negotiation: No reportable action. 8. ADJOURNMENT Peter Cosentini, Executive Director San Jacinto Assembly of God Church Price and terms of payment With no further business before the Board of Directors, Chairperson Buydos adjourned the meeting at 11:02 p.m. Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto by Chris Carlson Buydos, Chairperson ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, Agency Secretary Chairperson's Agenda REGULAR MEETING of the FINANCING AUTHORITY of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO MAY 5, 2005 Immediately Following the Regular Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto Meeting San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order ❑ Call the regular meeting of the Financing Authority to order at pm 1.2 Roll Call ❑ Announce for the record those present and those absent. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS None 3. PUBLIC HEARING: Now is the time for the public to address the Authority on any subject not listed on the agenda. Any person may address the Authority on any subject pertaining to Financing Authority business not listed on the Agenda during this portion of the Meeting. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the Authority Directors. 4. CITY DEPARTMENTS 4.1 Resolution No. / A Resolution of the San Jacinto Financing Authority Authorizing the Purchase and Sale of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto, Redevelopment Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2005, upon certain terms and conditions, approving the Form and Authorizing Execution of a Bond Purchase Agreement relating thereto and providing other matters properly relating thereto / Approve and Adopt / Bond Counsel & Finance Director U Call on Finance Director Bernie Simon to introduce Bond Counsel for staff report U CaII for public comments ❑ CaII for Council discussion U Call for motion and vote 5. CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by Authority Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the Financing Authority, staff, or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Authority Chairperson; state their name, address and the consent calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. None 6. CHAIRPERSON / MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS None 7. OPEN SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS CLOSED SESSION None 8. ADJOURNMENT ❑ Following motion, second, vote adjourn the meeting at ❑ Reconvene the regular City Council meeting pm It is the intention of the City of San Jacinto to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact City Hall at (909) 487-7330, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us ofyourparticular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. If you challenge any action of the City Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council (c/o the City Clerk) at, or prior to, the public hearing. Page 2 of 2 Financing Authority Agenda May 5, 2005 Via_ ikcui9ti- AMENDED AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL MAY 5, 2005, 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California I. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Invocation 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance 1.5 Special Presentations 1.5.1 Presentation of United States Flag / Specialist Jason Hayes 1.5.2 Proclamation 'May 2005 Is Water Awareness Month' / Accepting on behalf of Randy Record is Melanie Nieman and Peter Odencrans 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Now is the time for the public to address the Council on any subject within the jurisdiction of the City Council not listed on the agenda. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the City Council. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by City Council Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. If an item is pulled, it will be heard at the end of number 5. City Departments Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Mayor; state their name and address, and the consent calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. 3.1 Warrants at 05/05/05 / Approve / Finance Director City Council Agenda May 5, 2005 Page 2of5 3.2 Budget Hearing Date change from May 11, 2005 to May 31, 2005 / Approve / City Manager 3.3 City Sponsorship of American Cancer Society known as Relay for Life / Approve / City Manager 3.4 Purchase Work Order System module from H.T.E. accounting system software / Approve and Authorize Finance Director to execute purchase contract / Finance Director 3.5 Planning Technician job description and salary range / Approve / Community Development Director 3.6 Final Parcel Map 31717 — Nelson Development LLC / Approve and Authorize the Mayor to execute the Final Map / City Engineer 3.7 Final Parcel Map 31296 — Meritage Homes / Approve and Authorize the Mayor to execute the Final Map / City Engineer 4. PUBLIC HEARING 4.1 Cancellation of Land Conservation Contract — San Jacinto No. 2 / Applicant: All -Star Equities, 12250 Camino Real, San Diego, CA 92130: 1) Approve and Adopt - A De Minimis Impact finding for Tentative Cancellation of Land Conservation Contract — San Jacinto No.2 2) Approve and Adopt — A Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Cancellation of Land Conservation Contract — San Jacinto No. 2 3) Approve and Adopt Resolution No. _ / A Resolution that approves that the Tentative Cancellation is consistent with the Williamson Act and Approves of the Tentative Cancellation of San Jacinto No. 2 Land Conservation Contract / Community Development Director 4.2 Tentative Tract Map 32376 / Applicant Silverstone Development Company Inc / General Plan Amendment (GPA) 7-04 request to add 16.56 acres to the General Plan and designate it as Low Density Residential PUD No. 2- 04, a Planned Unite Development for a 337 unit single family detached residential development; Zone Change and Pre -zone Change No. 3-04 , a Zone Change and Pre -zone Change from County RA-5, City R-1, W-2 and C-2 to R-1 PUD (One family residential with a PUD act Map No. 32376 on 906.8 acres located north of the Ramona Expressway on both sides of the extension of San Jacinto Avenue: City Council Agenda May 5, 2005 Page 3 of 5 1) Mitigated Negative Declaration and its associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for this project / Approve 2) Resolution No. / Approve and Adopt / A Resolution approving General Plan Amendment No. 7-04, an amendment of the General Plan to add 16.56 acres to the City's General Plan as described and to designate said property as Low Density Residential 3) Ordinance No. 05-13 / Approve introduction and first reading of Ordinance No. 05-13 / An Ordinance approving PUD No. 4-04 , a 337 lot single family detach ed PUD to be known as Western Village, and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Planned Unit Development (PUD) No. 4-04, a 337 Lot Single Family Detached PUD to be Known as Western Village, Located on 96.8 Acres on the North Side of the Ramona Expressway on Both Sides of the Extension of San Jacinto Avenue 3) Ordinance No. 05-14 / Approve introduction and first reading of Ordinance No. 05-14 / An Ordinance approving Zone Change No. 3-04 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California Approving Change of Zone 3-04, A Prezone Change from County RA-5 to City R-1 PUD, and From City R-1, W-2and C-2 to R-1 PUD, on Property located Generally North of the Ramona Expressway on Both sides of the Extension of San Jacinto Avenue 4) Resolution No. / Approve and Adopt Resolution No. / A Resolution approving Variance No. 1-05 — a request to vary from the PUD requirement for RV parking for the Western Village PUD to be located on the north side of the Ramona Expressway on both sides of the extension of San Jacinto Avenue 5) Resolution No. / Approve and Adopt Resolution No. / A Resolution approving Tentative Tract Map No. 32376, a 337 lot residential subdivision on the north side of the Ramona Expressway on both sides of the extension of San Jacinto Avenue / Community Development Director 4.3 Ordinance No. 05-15 / Approve introduction and first reading of an Ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment 01-05, thereby reducing the parking requirement for drive -through restaurants and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, Califomia, Approving a Zone Text Amendment to Modify the Text of Article 15.03 (10), pertaining to Off -Street Parking for Drive -In Restaurants, of the San Jacinto Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance 340 City Council Agenda May 5, 2005 Page 4 of 5 5. CITY DEPARTMENTS 5.1 Policy for naming public facilities / Direct staff in regards to establishing a City resolution that sets the criteria for naming new City facilities / Approve / Assistant to the City Manager 5.2 Sponsorship of the Hemet Ryan Air Show / Approve and Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement with the Riverside County Economic Development Agency to be a $2,500 sponsorship of the Hemet Ryan Air Show 5.3 Resolution No. / A Resolution approving the Financing of Redevelopment Activities in the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area by the Redevelopment Agency of San Jacinto of the City of San Jacinto and other matters relating thereto / Approve and Adopt / Bond Counsel 5.4 Development Agreements affecting proposed Development Impact Fees (DIF) / Direct staff / City Manager 5.5 Space Needs / Approve one year lease not to exceed $1.15 /sq ft for the old Main Street Realty building / Space Needs Committee 6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS 6.1 Request by Council Member Ritchie to discuss a part-time senior liaison position 6.2 Reports 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford & Peter Cosentini Employee Organization: Management Association 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford & Peter Cosentini Employee Organization: Service Employees International Union 8. ADJOURNMENT