Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 6/6/2002AGENDA REGULAR MEETING SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL June 6, 2002, 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Invocation Father Earl Henry, St. Joseph's Catholic Church 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance 1.5 Special Presentations 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Now is the time for the public to address the Council on any subject not listed on the agenda. A recap of the nonagendized comments will be addressed under item number 2.1 during the City's second regular meeting of the month. 3. PUBLIC HEARING 3.1 Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2-02 / Ordinance No. 1101-02-08 / An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Adding Section 23.76, Wireless Telecommunications Facilities, to the San Jacinto Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance 340 / Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration and conduct Public Hearing; waive reading in full and motion first reading of Ordinance No. 1101-02-08 to read by title only: Ordinance No. 1102-02-08 / An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Adding Section 23.76, Wireless Telecommunications Facilities, to the San Jacinto Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance 340 4. CITY DEPARTMENTS 4.1 Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1 (LLPD No. 1) / Accept Engineer's Report and Declare the Intent to Levy and City Council Agenda May 16, 2002 Page 2 of 3 Collect Assessments within LLPD No. 1 and Give Notice of and Set the Time and Place for the Hearing on the Levy of the Proposed Assessment / Finance Director 4.2 Cooperative Agreement between the State of California Department of Transportation and the City of San Jacinto for the Interim Realignment of SR 79 / Approve agreement and Authorize Mayor to execute agreement / City Manager 4.3 Local Appointments List (aka Maddy List) / Ratification of Mayor Conner's City Council Member Appointments / Calendar Information / City Clerk 4.4 Amendment No. 5 to Development Agreement 1-89 / Authorize extension of time to October 17, 2002 / Planning Director 4.5 Actions for November 5, 2002 Election 4.5.1 Resolution No. / A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Calling a General Municipal Election on November 5, 2002 / Adopt / City Clerk 4.5.2 Resolution No. _ / A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Adopting Regulations for Candidates for Elective Office, Pertaining to the Electorate and the Costs thereof for the General Municipal Election to be Held in the City of San Jacinto on Tuesday, November 5, 2002 / Adopt / City Clerk 4.6 Optical Imaging Supplies and Equipment / Review and Approve specifications for supplies and equipment and Authorize purchase / City Clerk 4.7 City of San Jacinto Budget Fiscal Year 2002/2003 / Adopt / Finance Director 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by Agency Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the Redevelopment Agency, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Agency President; state their name, address and the consent calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. City Council Agenda May 16, 2002 Page 3of3 5.1 Warrant Register for Warrants, Prepaid Checks, and Payroll Checks Period Ending 6/6/02 / Approve / Finance Director 5.2 May 16, 2002 Budget Workshop Meeting Minutes / Approve / City Clerk 5.3 Treasurer's Report April 30, 2002 / Receive and File /Finance Director Meeting recesses to consider the Redevelopment Agency Agenda. Regular Meeting resumes following the Redevelopment Agency Meeting. 6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS CLOSED SESSION None 8. ADJOURNMENT CHALLENGE TO LAND USE DECISIONS: Any person seeking to challenge a decision regarding land use made by the City Council as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and the discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the City Council, shall be required to commence that action 90 days following the date on which the decision of the City Council becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Please refer to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes final. It is the intention of the City of San Jacinto to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact City Hall at (909) 487- 7330, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. 9. Doaotlay .Lr. elouinand. &try etenk the Sax paedxto. do 4aie4 eel* tlsat % awed to Ce floated tle 6oaegorx9 agenda tlia 31dt dart' oa 9169, as zegained 4 law. MEMORANDUM June 7, 2002 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: Jake Wager, City Manager SUBJECT: BUDGET — FY 2002-03 On Thursday, May 30, 2002, several clarifications were requested regarding the FY 2002-03 budget proposal. Responses from Public Works, Community Development, and Finance are attached. A question was asked regarding the estimated cost of constructing a block wall at Skyview Park. Based on a review of an estimate received for this project, and a review of the cost for a similar project recently completed, staff believes that $55,000 should be sufficient to complete this project. Memorandum Date: June 6, 2002 To: Jake Wager, City Manager From: Bob Lavin, Public Works Superintendent Re: City Parks Monthly Duties The City of San Jacinto has six (6) parks located in various areas of the city. These areas are included as a segment of the city Lighting Landscape and Maintenance District (LLMD). Grounds maintenance for these areas is the responsibility of the landscape contractor, including but not limited to, turf mowing and edging, shrub pruning, tree trimming, weed control, rodent/pest control, trash and debris removal, restroom cleanup and rinsing, restroom lockup (Rancho, Mistletoe, Salle), parking lot lockup (Rancho), and other related duties. Parks Division staff Ray Sanchez, Supervisor and Paul Hernandez, Maint I are responsible for all irrigation related duties and all extras as needed and required. Park names and related duties required of staff are as follows: 1. Druding Park (Ramona Bl x Pico St) — Irrigation scheduling; timer and sprinkler repairs/adjustments; trees, shrubs and flowers planted/replaced as needed; tables, benches, fountains and signage installed, repaired or replaced as needed (vandalism); Veteran's Memorial (Tank) painted, repaired and/or prepared as needed for special occasions. The area of Druding Park covers 2/3`d acre. 2. Hofmann Park/Community Center (Pico St x Sixth St) — Irrigation scheduling; timer and sprinkler repairs/adjustments; trees, shrubs and flowers planted/replaced as needed; tables, benches, fountains and signage installed, repaired or replaced as needed; picnic structure (Gazebo) painted, repaired and/or prepared as needed for special occasions. The area of Hoffman Park/Community Center covers 1 '/2 acres. PUBLIC WORKS 3. Mistletoe Park (Main St x Mistletoe Ave) — Irrigation scheduling; timer and sprinkler repairs/adjustments; plant materials installed/replaced as needed; tables, benches, fountains and signage repaired/replaced as needed; play equipment installed, repaired or replaced as needed; restroom facilities as needed including tissue/towels, fixtures/lighting, and graffiti abatement; picnic structure repairs and cleanup. The area of Mistletoe Park covers 2 acres. 4. Rancho Park (Esplanade Ave x Arroyo Viejo St) — Irrigation scheduling; timer and sprinkler repairs/adjustments; plant materials replaced as needed; tables, benches, fountains and signage repaired/replaced; play equipment repaired/replaced; restroom facilities checked, repairs and cleanup; tennis court and basketball court repairs (nets) and cleanup (wash downs); picnic structure(s) repairs and cleanup; lighting repairs as needed. The area of Rancho Park covers 5 '/2 acres. 5. Sallee Park (Idyllwild Dr x Tahquitz Ave) — Irrigation scheduling; timer and sprinkler repairs/adjustments; tree rimming and cleanup; tables, benches, fountains and signage repaired/replaced; play equipment repaired/replaced; restroom facilities checked and repaired as needed. The area of Sallee Park covers 5 acres. 6. Skyview Park/Tot-Lot (Skyview Ave x Ramona Bl) — Irrigation scheduling; timer and sprinkler repairs/adjustments; tree replacement; tables, benches, fountains and signage repaired/replaced; play equipment repaired/replaced; picnic structure repairs and cleanup (Graffiti); fence repairs (vandalism). The area of Skyview Park/Tot-Lot covers 1/3 acre. PUBLIC WORKS To: From: Date: Subject: Sallee Park Memorandum Jake Wager, City Manager z. . Tim Hults, Planning Director V4' June 6, 2002 Budget Presentation Follow-up I have worked with Sam Geopp from Valley Wide on the Phase I renovations to Sallee Park. The environmental document has been finalized and forwarded to the County Clerk for posting. Sam Geopp has completed the bid documents and submitted a request to the State for Proposition 12 funds in order to leverage the CDBG funds (approx. $95,000) allocated to the project. The initial phase of development will include the removal of several unsafe and inappropriate trees, installation of a new irrigation system at the park only, and the hydro seeding of the park. In addition, the renovation of the ballpark, the installation of new ballpark lighting, the renovation of the restroom building, the parking lot and the basketball court are also Phase I improvements. With regard to the overall Sallee Park/Monte Vista Master Plan, the School District is exploring how Monte Vista will be used in the upcoming years. The School District is analyzing a number of options for all their campuses as their enrollment continues to increase. Once the student population at the school is determined (i.e. elementary or middle school), the District will then finalize the type of playground or recreation facilities needed at the campus. When a decision is made on the campus population, the District staff, Valley -Wide staff and I will begin meeting to develop a master plan for the Sallee Park/Monte Vista area. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Budget Follow-up Page 2 Until the master plan is fully developed and approved by the City Council, School District Board and Valley -Wide Board, it is difficult to budget for any improvements. Additionally, a participation agreement amongst all three agencies will be needed. The participation agreement would also determine the level of financial participation by each agency. Once the agreement is developed and approved, I would recommend that Park Development Funds be used toward the City's funding participation. These funds could be allocated through the budget amendment process or at the mid -year budget review. HOME Program Funds The HOME Program is a federal funding source developed by HUD to improve the supply of affordable housing. Because San Jacinto is not an entitlement City (over 50,000 in population), the City entered into a three-year cooperation agreement with County of Riverside Economic Development Agency (EDA) for CDBG program funds. The terms of the cooperation agreement provide that the City may only pursue HOME funds directly from the County. As such, Staff will coordinate with County EDA Staff to submit the appropriate application for HOME Program funds. If the City were successful in obtaining HOME Program funds, the HOME Program funds would be leveraged with Redevelopment Housing funds toward the implementation of one of the proposed housing projects included in the proposed budget. A budget amendment would be necessary to include any HOME Program funds awarded to the City into the budget. MEMORANDUM June 6, 2002 To: Jake Wager, City Manager From: Bernie Simon, Finance Director Subj: FY 2002-2003 Budget Review Responses to Budget Hearing Questions from May 30, 2002 1. Change in Contracts, Leases and Rents —Public Works Streets -Summary Budget Page 89- Summary line item for Contracts, Leases and Rents - $92,000 for current FY, $ 56,083 as an actual number for FYE 6/30/01 and $55,000 for proposed FY 2002-03. Proposed FY 2002-03 budget is for $5,000 for weed spraying services and $50,000 for traffic signal maintenance for a Total of $55,000. The current FY budget is $92,000, and includes tree trimming, other street services, $28,000 for traffic signal maintenance, and another $28,000 budget adjustment for a prior year catch-up traffic maintenance bill from Riverside County. Tree trimming was moved from this line item and placed in Capital Projects - Tree Trimming projects in Fund 32 — Parkway Development and is estimated at $110,000 under line item 032-7150-410-4001. 2. Community Development Budget Summary Questions were noted about Insurance and Bonds of $135,270 for Proposed FY 2002-03 and that it increased from $56,035 as budgeted in the current FY. Our projected overall Liability insurance costs including self retention, claim costs, claims programs, defense costs and proactive insurance services are anticipated to cost an additional 41 % with most of the costs resulting from anticipated higher reinsurance costs through our risk management pool (PERMA). The overall liability insurance costs are then allocated to all funds on a prorata direct cost basis. In this particular budget summary, Community Development includes Planning, Building, CDBG, RDA and LM RDA Housing and excludes any Capital Projects separately stated in the Capital Projects Section of the budget document. Overhead allocation of $43,220 relates to Measure A projects that should actually be shown in the Capital Projects section rather than the Community Development Summary Budget. Page 64 Fund Summary of Community Development Funding section showing $56, 775 from Measure A, actually relates to Measure A capital projects and should be in the Capital Projects Section. Professional Fees Summary indicated a proposed budget of $226,445. The majority of costs consist of: $ 50,000 Continue General Plan Update — General Fund —010 $100,000 Continue General Plan/Housing- RDA Fund -099 $ 50,000 - User Fee Study General Fund -010 Page 64 Fund Summary of Community Development Funding section showing $100,578 of CDBG Projects, shows only non -capital projects. There is another $280,000 in CDBG costs showing under the "Capital Projects" Section. 3. 8% Contingency Reserve Figure of $491,290 shown on page 2 and 3 is based on the Original Approved Budget Resolution for FY 2001-2002 relating to the General Fund. The current year budget has been increased through additional budget appropriations during the year but the City has not increased this amount. There is no current policy or direction to increase this amount each year or as the general fund budget increases. To increase the contingency will decrease the available, unrestricted General Fund Balance accordingly. This amount can be set to any level deemed appropriate by the Council. EXHIBIT A January 3, 2002 COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES CDBG Review: Primary Mayor Williams Alternate Council Member Ayres Education: Dropped 2002 General Plan Review: Primary Council Member Carlson-Buydos Alternate Council Member Ayres Highway 79 Realignment: Primary Council Member Carlson-Buydos Alternate Council Member Ayres Refuse/Recycling: Primary Mayor Williams Alternate Vice Mayor Conner San Jacinto Levees: Primary Mayor Williams Alternate Vice Mayor Conner Economic Development: COUNCIL STANDING SUBCOMMITTEES Primary Council Member Ayres Alternate Council Member 1 Carlson-Buydos Alternate 2 Council Member Good Historic Preservation: Primary Council Member Ayres Alternate Vice Mayor Conner Public Safety: Primary Mayor Williams, Alternate Council Member Ayres, Chief Heller Municipal Finance Committee: Primary Council Member Good, Alternate Treasurer Potts Finance Director Simon Civic Center Committee: Dropped 2002 OUTSIDE COMMITTEES Chamber Liaison: Primary Council Member Ayres Alternate Vice Mayor Conner EMWD Planning Task Force: Vice Mayor Conner Groundwater Association: Healthy Communities: RCTC: RTA: Riverside County/City Selection: Riverside County Disaster Committee: San Jacinto Disaster: SCE FRANCHISE: Primary Council Member Carlson-Buydos Alternate Vice Mayor Conner Council Member Good Primary Council Member Carlson-Buydos Alternate Vice Mayor Conner Primary Council Member Ayres Alternate Council Member Good Mayor Williams Mayor Williams Mayor Williams Commander Simmons City Manager Wager Finance Director Simon Planning Director Hults Riverside County Fire Battalion Chief Barron Riverside County Fire Battalion Chief Barron Primary Vice Mayor Conner Alternate Council Member Good Sr. Issues & Sr. Housing Dropped Committee: Tribal Council Liaison VEDC: WRCOG Water Issues: 4th of July Parade: Primary Mayor Williams Alternate Vice Mayor Conner Primary Council Member Ayres Alternate 1 Vice Mayor Conner Alternate 2 Council Member Good Primary Vice Mayor Conner Alternate Council Member Carlson-Buydos Primary Vice Mayor Conner Alternate Council Member Carlson-Buydos Council Member Ayres Festival of Families Mayor Williams Library Advisory Landscape LLMD Primary Vice Mayor Conner Alternate San Jacinto Librarian Primary Council Member Good Alternate Council Member Carlson-Buydos Airport Land Use Committee: Mayor Williams, Treasurer Potts (designated by Riverside County City Selection Committee) S A N JACINTO To: All Personnel From: Police Administration Date: June 6, 2002 Subject: New Hire, Police Officer Effective June 6, 2002, Otis Grant will start as a Police Officer with our department. Otis has been with the department since February 15, 2001 in a Police Officer Reserve capacity. He attended Rio Hondo Police Academy and has an AA degree in Administration of Justice from San Bernardino Valley College. Otis volunteers his time to underprivileged children within the community. He feels he can make a difference by being a roll model to teens and adults by his positive disposition. Otis enjoys fishing, working out, and relaxing with his 6 year old son Brandon. POLICE DEPARTMENT EXHIBIT A � January 3, 2002 COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES CDBG Review: Primary Mayor Williams` t Alternate Council Member Ayres Education: Dropped 2002 General Plan Review: Primary Council Member Carlson-Buydos Alternate Council Member Ayres Highway 79 Realignment: Primary Council Member Carlson-Buydos Alternate Council Member Ayres Refuse/Recycling: Primary Mayor Williams Alternate Vice Mayorner San Jacinto Levees: Primary Mayor Williams- ki Alternate Vice -Mayor Cont Economic Development: Historic Preservation: Public Safety: COUNCIL STANDING SUBCOMMITTEES Primary Council Member Ayres Alternate Council Member 1 Carlson-Buydos Alternate 2 Council Member Good Primary Council Member Ayres Alternate Vice Mayor Conner nn Primary Mayor Williams, lO^ `' Alternate Council Member Ayres, Chief Heller Municipal Finance Committee: Primary Council Member Good, Alternate Treasurer Potts Finance Director Simon Civic Center Committee: Dropped 2002 OUTSIDE COMMITTEES Chamber Liaison: Primary Council Member Ayres Alternate Vice Mayor Conner EMWD Planning Task Force: Vice Mayor Conner Groundwater Association: Healthy Communities: RCTC: RTA: Riverside County/City Selection: Riverside County Disaster Committee: San Jacinto Disaster: $G , FRANCHISE: Primary Council Member Carlson-Buydos Alternate Vice Mayor Conner Council Member Good Primary Council Member Carlson-Buydos Alternate Vice Mayor Conner Primary Council Member Ayres Alternate Council Member Good Mayor Warns '1 Mayor Wiiiiams COV1.41 Mayor Williams Commander Simmons City Manager Wager Finance Director Simon Planning Director Hults Riverside County Fire Battalion Chief Barron Riverside County Fire Battalion Chief Barron Primary Vice MayorGentler-0 Alternate Council Member Good Sr. Issues & Sr. Housing Dropped Committee: Tribal Council Liaison VEDC: WRCOG Water Issues: 4th of July Parade: Festival of Families Mayor WitMnWS- Vice Mayor Conner Pririrrativtermber Ayres - Alternate 1 Vice Mayor Conner Alternate 2 Council Member Good Primary Vice Mayor Conner Alternate Council Member Carlson-Buydos Primary Vice Mayor Conner Alternate Council Member Carlson-Buydos Council Member Ayres Mayor Williams`ies Library Advisory Landscape LLMD Primary Vice Mayor Conner Alternate San Jacinto Librarian Primary Council Member Good Alternate Council Member Carlson-Buydos Airport Land Use Committee: ykftra Treasurer Potts e � ��' (designated by Riverside County City Selection Committee) R( LrLP it)CCO& /h1 recce da114)5 C ki) — cc. oe‘vi611( c(JA 0(41k3 f9g4 20943 ovi rvi r"r� "��y"�,y� N� G� � yY" Western Riverside Council of Governments County of Riverside, City of Banning, City of Beaumont, City of Calimesa, City of Canyon Lake, City of Corona, City of Hemet, City of Lake Elsinore, City of Moreno Valley, City of Murrieta, City of Norco, City of Perris, City of Riverside, City of San Jacinto, City of Temecula Date: March 14, 2002 To: Jake Wager, City Manager, City of San Jacinto From: Rick Bishop, Executive Director 'CL,,►✓ Subj: Request for City Council Representative to WRCOG/SANDAG Jobs/Housing Balance Policy Committee As you are aware, WRCOG has received a $500,000 grant from the Housing and Community Development Department to examine jobs and housing balance issues in partnership with the San Diego Associated Governments. In working with SANDAG staff, we need to establish a Policy Committee, comprised of elected officials, for purposes of meeting periodically to provide policy guidance and direction to staff as our work program is implemented. The purpose of this correspondence is to request your assistance in recruiting an elected official from the City of San Jacinto to participate in this interregional partnership. Other representatives from the WRCOG subregion are anticipated to include an elected official from the County of Riverside, City of Temecula, City of Murrieta, City of Lake Elsinore, City of Perris and City of Hemet. A number of elected representatives from SANDAG will comprise the rest of the committee. Our initial meeting will be held on Thursday, April 11, 2002, from 9:00 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. at the Temecula Creek Inn in the City of Temecula (continental breakfast will be provided). Future meetings have not been scheduled, but I anticipate that this Committee would meet quarterly during the three- year term of this grant (unless the Committee determines otherwise). The enclosed "Questions and Answers" document provides some background information on the project. If you desire additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 909-787-7952. In the meantime, I look forward to hearing from you with regard to which member of the San Jacinto City Council will participate on this important Committee. Enclosure H:1Programs\Planning\I R P\SAN DAGU R Pcomm_invitejw.doc 3880 Lemon Street, Suite 300 • Riverside, CA 92501 • (909) 787-7985 • Fax (909) 787-7991 www.wrcog.cog.ca.us Western Riverside Council of Governments County of Riverside, City of Banning, City of Beaumont, City of Calimesa, City of Canyon Lake, City of Corona, City of Hemet, City of Lake Elsinore, City of Moreno Valley, City of Murrieta, City of Norco, City of Perris, City of Riverside, City of San Jacinto, City of Temecula Questions and Answers about the 1-15 Interregional Partnership The California Department of Housing & Community Development has recently awarded grant funding to the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), Ithe Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) for the purpose of examining the serious imbalance of jobs and housing between these two regions. The intent of this newly formed Interregional Partnership is to provide recommendations for consideration by local agencies, the private sector and the state on solutions. The following Questions & Answers provide additional background on the purpose and objectives of this new Partnership. What is the Interregional Partnership (Partnership)? The Interregional Partnership is a voluntary partnership between elected officials representing the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), and other key decision -makers from public and private sector organizations. Why was the Partnership formed? The Partnership was formed in 2001 to address the challenges of serious imbalances in jobs and housing growth across the two -county area. Western Riverside communities provide a growing portion of the needed housing for workers in the San Diego region. What is the significance of this imbalance in jobs and housing growth? Increasing numbers of long distance commuters generated by land use decisions will have serious impacts on transportation, our environment, and general quality of life. How will the Partnership address this situation? The Partnership was convened to establish a framework that allows local policy makers from the member councils of governments and the private sector to address the interrelationships between the location of jobs and housing, and the concurrent impacts on transportation and air quality. The Partnership's strength is in its diversity; it has representatives from communities on opposite ends of the same problem. Each of its member's communities is faced with different aspects of the situation: rapid, imbalanced and uncoordinated growth. 3880 Lemon Street, Suite 300 • Riverside, CA 92501 • (909) 787-7985 • Fax (909) 787-7991 www.wrcog.cog.ca.us • • • What are the Partnership's goals? The primary goal is to foster a more sustainable land use pattern providing employment closer to where people live in housing -rich areas, and more affordable housing closer to employment in job -rich areas. The overall intent is to reduce the number of work -related vehicle trips and the amount of commuter miles traveled. More specifically, the Partnership's objectives are to: • Achieve a more equitable jobs/housing balance • Improve transportation and air quality • Enhance the quality of life throughout our interregional area • Pursue interregional economic development opportunities, and • Establish more sustainable methods of moving people between their homes and distant jobs. How will the Partnership achieve its goals? Working through a committee structure, the Partnership will identify and prioritize issues related to jobs/housing balance, recommend strategies and model approaches to address the issues, and promote adoption of its recommendations into existing jurisdictional and agency plans and programs. Evaluation will occur on both a policy and a technical level. How will the Partnership's efforts be funded? The Partnership's efforts are funded through an Interregional Partnership (IRP) Grant from the State, which is designed to address the impacts of substantial jobs/housing imbalances. Distribution and monitoring of the grant is under the direction of the State Department of Housing and Community Development. What is the IRP Grant money to be used for? IRP Grant money can be used to fund a number of eligible activities designed to encourage economic investment and job creation near available housing, and increase housing development near major employment centers. What does it take to achieve a more equitable jobs/housing balance? The concept of jobs/housing balance is based on the premise that the overall number of commuting vehicle trips, and the resultant vehicle miles traveled, can be effectively reduced when both sufficient jobs are available "locally" to balance the employment demands of the community, and housing is also "locally" available that is affordable to the workers who fill those jobs. • • • How is jobs/housing balance measured? Jobs/housing balance can be measured, or defined in different ways by examining several indicators, such as the jobs -to -housing ratio, home -to -work trips (origin/destination), the number of jobs per capita, and other similar factors. Why isn't the market achieving balance on its own? There are factors that work against achievement of a jobs/housing balance. These include the availability and cost of land for housing, commerce and industry; local land use policies and zoning codes; allowable density/intensity and the types of uses authorized; the permitting process; and growth -control measures, among others. Is land availability and cost a constraint in this case? It is not a constraint within Western Riverside County. In fact, it is abundant and affordable land that is stimulating much of the housing and job growth that is occurring in the Inland Empire. Conversely, in the San Diego region, land for housing development will reach its carrying capacity much more quickly. What can the Partnership do to correct these contributory land use constraints? The Partnership establishes an ongoing relationship between agencies and interests that share a common interest in resolving growth related -concerns. The Partnership is developing an information base from which sound mitigation strategies and policy recommendations can be drawn. What types of strategies and policy recommendations will help to shape future growth and commute patterns? Examples of strategies and recommendations that could be encouraged include: integrating the concept of jobs/housing balance as part of community and regional plans; making nearby housing availability a major consideration for locating employment centers; using incentives where appropriate; increasing the capacity of I-15 and transportation options available to interregional commuters. • • • Who will implement these strategies and policy recommendations? The Partnership will likely develop recommendations on policies and implementing mechanisms to assist local government officials achieve the following objectives: • Alleviate roadblocks to building infill/redevelopment housing and to converting brownfield sites for housing; • Encourage transit -oriented development; • Re-evaluate zoning policies and rewrite zoning ordinances to make more land available for housing construction; • Institute appropriate state and local finance reform to help increase incentives for housing production by reducing local government reliance on sales tax revenues, and competition among jurisdictions for sales tax generating land uses; • Target education and research toward new economy jobs in housing -rich areas; and • Institute community -based job training; • Sponsor business incubation programs. Have there been previous efforts in the region to address jobs/housing imbalances? Yes. Several years ago, SCAG attempted to develop a "policy growth forecast" that would move the six -county region towards a long range projection that increased jobs in housing rich areas, and vice -versa. That proposal was met with considerable criticism by interests who claimed that government should not try to dictate through policy area land uses, and was subsequently abandoned. In addition, SANDAG has been working on implementing land use distribution smart growth policies that would help provide enough housing in the region and reduce commute travel time and distance. Isn't the geographic imbalance between jobs and housing a problem that has largely been self-correcting? Yes. Historically, jobs have moved from their original centers to housing -rich suburbs to take advantage of lower land and labor costs and provide shorter commute trips for their employees. If jobs/housing imbalances are self-correcting, then why is this effort necessary? There are several emerging trends that threaten to exacerbate problems associated with imbalances. For example, the high-tech and knowledge -based New Economy firms are relatively insensitive to traditional land and labor cost factors. They tend to be collaborative in nature, and tend to concentrate in urban core locations. When housing is limited around high- tech nodes, affluent knowledge workers displace low and moderate -income groups, which has caused significant problems in the Bay Area recently. The dispersion of New Economy companies to housing -rich areas may not follow traditional patterns because of their tendency to coalesce and the high priority placed on locating in culturally rich urban environments. In Southern California, high-tech clusters are located predominantly in coastal locations. • • • Isn't the western portion of the Inland Empire slated for significant future job growth? Yes. Still, much of the Inland Empire will remain housing -rich in 2020. Although job growth has been substantial in the Inland Empire, much of this growth has been in relatively low -paying economic sectors, and the gap in per capita income between it and the rest of the region has been increasing. Where does the State Government stand on jobs/housing balance issues? The concept of jobs/housing balance is reinforced by recent legislative proposals, such as AB 2864 (Torlakson) that established the Jobs/Housing Balance Improvement Program that provides state funding to local governments for projects that will mitigate the imbalance of jobs and housing in local communities. What are some of the strategies for achieving jobs/housing balance that will be examined for potential application as part of this effort? Strategies that will be examined include: • Increasing the use of mass transit and other alternative transportation options; • Locating higher density housing near employment centers, • Locating employment centers and other job opportunities in proximity to affordable housing locations; • Promoting in -fill and mixed -use developments; • Actively recruiting businesses that will utilize the local work force; • Providing affordable housing opportunities within the community; • Parking reductions; • Economic inducements; • Targeted education and research; • Fiber-optic cable investments; • Improved transit service. Won't planned transportation improvements ease the situation? Significant investments in the region's arterial and freeway networks will continue to be needed to accommodate future growth. However, planned improvements on I-15 will not be able to fully accommodate existing and projected growth if current patterns of development are sustained. June 6, 2002 AGENDA # 3.1 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tim Hults, Planning Director/\!( SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2-02 to add Section 23.76, Wireless Telecommunication Facilities to the San Jacinto Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance 340 APPLICANT: RECOMMENDATION: City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 By motion adopta Mitigated Negative Declaration and introduce Ordinance Number 1101-02- 08 approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2-02. BACKGROUND: On March 13, 2002, the Planning Commission adopted resolution recommending that the City Council approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2-02. The purpose of the Wireless Telecommunication Ordinance is to establish appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services to the residents and businesses of the City, in a manner which will facilitate the location for various types of wireless telecommunication facilities in permitted locations so that they are consistent with the character of the City, and consistent with land uses in residential, commercial and industrial areas. The draft Ordinance before the Council is similar to what the City of Ontario currently uses. The in-house Project Review Committee, which is made up of City staff including the City Manager or a designated representative and City Engineer would have the ability to approve a narrow range of wireless telecommunication facilities. At this level of review, a CUP would not be required, allowing staff to complete the review and issue conditions of approval. Applications of this type, among other things, would be located in the commercial or industrial zones, utilize stealth designs and require the equipment buildings to be screened from view. Applications would also have to meet the zoning requirements for the under lying zone, including height. The second level is the CUP with Planning Commission review. Applications that fall into this category are those that cannot be approved by the Project Review Committee. This type of application also includes wireless facilities adjacent to residential zones and facilities that create a visual impact. Though its purpose was clear and the Planning Commission did have the opportunity to comment on the function of the Project Review Committee, it was inadvertently left out of the Ordinance the Planning Commission adopted. To correct this oversight, it was suggested that the role of the PRC be added to the Ordinance when it goes to the City Council. As such, the purpose Project Review Committee is to study, consider and develop recommendations for approval and act in an advisory capacity within the Community Development Department in regards to permits and approvals. The Committee shall be made up of the City Manager or a designated representative and the City Engineer. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: An environmental initial study has been conducted which has determined that there will not be a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, adoption of a Negative Declaration is recommended. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" - March 13, 2002 Planning Commission Minutes and Resolution Attachment "B" - CEQA Documents Attachment "C" - Planning Commission Approved Zoning Ordinance Amendment FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. The Ordinance Amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of San Jacinto because it will aid in implementing General Plan Land Use Element policy No 6A(2): Encourage and support an adequate levels of public services to meet the need of the existing and future planned population. The proposed ordinance specifically encourages new wireless telecommunication facilities to consider the characteristics of the area. 2. The Ordinance Amendment is reasonably related to the public welfare of the citizens of the City of San Jacinto and the surrounding region because it implements the direction of the City Council as expressed by the adopted General Plan. 6.0 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS 6.1 Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2-02, Draft Telecommunications Ordinance City Initiated Zoning Ordinance Amendment to establish performance standards for wireless telecommunications facilities City Wide. Information Planner Clayton presented his staff report dated March 13, 2002. Mr. Jeff Ballinger, City Attorney, referred to Item 4 (c.) (iv.) and recommended it be changed to "state of the art stealth technology" The commission had discussion of stealth in general and specifically the Valley Wide and EMWD sites as well as scenic corridors, landscaping requirements, lattice towers and chain link fencing. Public Hearing opened at 7:17pm and closed with no comments. M/S/C (TAVENNER/RAO) to adopt Planning Commission Resolution 02-11, recommending City Council approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2-02. Ayes: Rao, Tavenner, Warneke, and Whitefield Noes: None 7.0 BUSINESS ITEMS 7.1 Planning Commission Determination of use - Pet Crematorium in the M-1 Zone Information Planner Clayton described proposal and commissioners were given a packet from the applicant. The commission discussed the location of project. Mr. Dan Messina representing Golden Oaks Pet Services described the units to be used and answered questions about regulations, animal sizes, timing and zoning. The commission further discussed checking with county to see if other facilities in the county have had problems. Director Hults explained the commission could make a determination that pet crematoriums comply with M-1 or they could propose a zone change with performance standards. They could only access standards if the commission brings forth a zone amendment to present to City Council. Planning Commission Page 4 February 13, 2002 RESOLUTION NO. 02-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT TO ADD SECTION 23.76, WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES, TO THE SAN JACINTO ZONING ORDINANCE, ORDINANCE 340 WHEREAS, it is intended that said wireless telecommunication facilities section would establish appropriate locations, site development standards and permit requirements to allow such facilities to service residents and businesses of the city; and WHEREAS, applications for wireless telecommunication facilities will be subject to a two -level review process; and WHEREAS, the preferred location of Wireless Telecommunication Facilities shall be Industrial Zones, Commercial Zones and Agricultural Zones; and WHEREAS, the preferred locations of Wireless Telecommunication Facilities within Specific Plans is Industrial Zones, Business Parks, then Commercial Zones; WHEREAS, the Application was reviewed, studied, and found to comply the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") as more fully described below; WHEREAS, on March 13, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of San Jacinto ("Commission") conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Application at which time all persons wishing to testify in connection with the Application were heard and the Application was comprehensively reviewed; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Based on the entire record before the Commission, all written and oral evidence presented to the Commission, and the findings set forth in this Resolution, the Commission recommends the City Council of the City of San Jacinto approve the aforementioned zone text amendment as described in the attached Exhibit "A" ("Zone Text Amendment") . SECTION 2. Based on the entire record before the Commission and all written and oral evidence presented to the Commission, the Commission finds the Zone Text Amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of San Jacinto because: A. The Zone Text Amendment provides for the comprehensive planning for public facilities and infrastructure; and B. The Zone Text Amendment helps promote and achieve the Land Use Element goal of "future programming for a comprehensive system of utilities and other public services necessary to the proper functioning of the city." SECTION 3. Based on the entire record before the Commission and all written and oral evidence presented to the Commission, the Conunission finds the Zone Text Amendment/Zone Change is reasonably related to the public welfare of the citizens of the City of San Jacinto and the surrounding region because it implements the direction of the City Council to establish appropriate Locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services to the residents and businesses of the City. SECTION 4. Based on the entire record before the Commission and all written and oral evidence presented to the Commission, the Commission finds the Zone Text Amendment/Zone Change complies with the CEQA for the following reasons: An environmental initial study has been conducted which has determined that this project could not be a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 13th day of March, 2002. G ► ii t�crr�r '-e Planning Commission Chairperson ATTEST: Planning Commission Secretary CITY OF SAN JACINTO ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM: INITIAL STUDY Project Case Type (s) and Number(s): Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2-02 Lead Agency Name: City of San Jacinto Address: 248 E. Main Street Contact Person: David Clayton Telephone Number: 909-487-7330 Applicant's Name: City of San Jacinto Address: 201 East Main St; San Jacinto, CA 92583 I. PROJECT INFORMATION A. Project Description (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to project grading, later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation): The project involves the consideration of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to establish appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services to the residents and businesses of the City, in a manner which will facilitate the location for various types of wireless telecommunication facilities in permitted locations so that they are consistent with the character of the City B. Type of Project: Site Specific 0 ; Citywide ®; Community 0; Policy 0. Two or more of the above may apply. A Site Specific Project involves fewer than 1000 property owners in a definable area and results in a change in existing land uses, zoning, open space designations or Community Plan land use designations. If Site Specific Project was checked fill out the remainder of this page. If Site Specific Project was not checked and the project covers a defined area, fill in only Item C "Total Project Area" and G below. C. Total Project Area: 26.81 square miles To the extent possible, fill out the remaining information for Item "C" as it applies to the project. Residential: Acres_; Lots ; Units ; Projected No. of Residents Commercial: Acres ; Lots ; Sq. Ft. of Bldg. Area ; Est. No. of Employees Industrial: Acres ; Lots ; Sq. Ft. of Bldg. Area ; Est. No. of Employees Other: D. Assessor's Parcel No(s): E. Street References: F. Section, Township & Range Description or reference/attach a Legal Description: G. Brief description of the existing environmental setting of the project site and its surroundings:. II. APPLICABLE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE POLICIES AND ZONING This page must only be completed for proposals that qualify as Site Specific Projects. The information on this page is not required for projects which are not Site Specific; however, completion of this section is encouraged. A. Open Space and Conservation Map Designation(s): B. Land Use Planning Area (L.U.P.A.) Information 1. L. U. P. A. Name(s): 2. Subarea, if any: 3. Community Policy Area, if any: C. Community Plan Land Use Allocation Map Information 1. Community Plan, if any: 2. Community Plan Land Use Designation, if any: D. Adopted Specific Plan Information 1. Name and Number of Specific Plan, if any: 2. Specific Plan Planning Area, and Policies, if any: E. Existing Zoning: F. Proposed Zoning, if any: G. Adjacent and Surrounding Zoning: 3 III. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below (■ ) would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Hazards & Hazardous Materials Public Services Agriculture Resources Hydrology/Water Quality Recreation Air Quality Land Use/Planning Transportation/Traffic Biological Resources Mineral Resources Utilities/Service Systems Cultural Resources Noise Other Geology/Soils Population/Housing Mandatory Findings of Significance IV. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: A PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/NEGATIVE DECLARATION WAS NOT PREPARED I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ✓ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project, described in this document, have been made or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. A PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/NEGATIVE DECLARATION WAS PREPARED I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment NOTHING FURTHER IS REQUIRED because all potentially significant effects (a) have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable legal standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. I find that although all potentially significant effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable legal standards, some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Califomia Code of Regulations, Section 15162 exist. An ADDENDUM to a previously -certified EIR or Negative Declaration has been prepared and will be considered by the approving body or bodies. 4 I find that at least one of the conditions described in California Code of Regulations, Section 15162 exist, but I further find that only minor additions or changes are necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation; therefore a SUPPLEMENT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required that need only contain the information necessary to make the previous EIR adequate for the project as revised. I find that at least one of the following conditions described in Califomia Code of Regulations, Section 15162, exist and a SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any the following - (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (C) Mitigation measures or altematives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR or negative declaration would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measures or altematives. David Clayton Printed Name EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: For TIM HULTS, PLANNING DIRECTOR 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in its explanation following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e. g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e. g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation incorporated, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more `Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation 5 measures has reduced an ettect trom "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less I han Significant Impact." I he lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from "Earlier Analyses" as cited in Section VI may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. California Code of Regulations, Section 15063 (c) (3) (D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: (a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. (b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. (c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address the site -specific conditions for the project. 6) References to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances) should be included. Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) The explanation of each issue should identify: (a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and (b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. 6 V. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ASSESSMENT In accordance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code Section 21000 - 21178.1), this Initial Study has been prepared to analyze the proposed project to determine any potential significant impacts upon the environment that would result from construction and implementation of the project. In accordance with California Code of Regulations, Section 15063, this Initial Study is a preliminary analysis prepared by the Lead Agency, the City of San Jacinto, in consultation with other jurisdictional agencies, to determine whether a Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, or an Environmental Impact Report is required for the proposed project. The purpose of this Initial Study is to inform the decision -makers, affected agencies, and the public of potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the proposed project. Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated AESTHETICS Would the project 1. Scenic Resources a) Have a substantial effect upon a scenic highway corridor within which it is located? • b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings and unique or landmark features; obstruct any prominent scenic vista or view open to the public; or result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? • Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 2. Other Lighting Issues a) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? • b) Expose residential property to unacceptable Tight levels? • 7 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: AGRICULTURE RESOURCES Would the project 3. Agriculture a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the Califomia Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? • b) Conflict with existing agricultural use, or a Williamson Act ( agricultural preserve) contract (Riv. Co. Agricultural Land Conservation Contract Maps)? • c) Cause development of non-agricultural uses within 300 feet of agriculturally zoned property? • d) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? • Source: SJGP (MEA-IV-15) Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: AIR QUALITY Would the project 4. Air Quality Impacts a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? • b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? • 8 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? • d) Expose sensitive receptors which are located within 1 mile of the project site to project substantial point source emissions? • e) Involve the construction of a sensitive receptor located within one mile of an existing substantial point source emitter? • f) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? • Source: SJGP Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the project 5. Wildlife & Vegetation a) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state conservation plan? • b) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any endangered, or threatened species, as listed in Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations (Sections 670.2 or 670.5) or in Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations (Sections 17.11 or 17.12)? • c) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Wildlife Service? • 9 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? • e) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? • f) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vemal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? • g) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? • Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project 6. Historic Resources a) Alter or destroy an historic site? • b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in California Code of Regulations, Section 15064.5? • 10 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 7. Archaeological Resources a) Alter or destroy an archaeological site. • b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Califomia Code of Regulations, Section 15064.5? • c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? • d) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? • Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 8. Paleontological Resources Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? • Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: GEOLOGY AND SOILS 11 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Definitions for Land Use Suitability Ratings Where indicated below, the appropriate Land Use Suitability Rating(s) has been underlined. NA - Not Applicable S - Generally Suitable PS - Provisionally Suitable U - Generally Unsuitable R - Restricted a. Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects including the risk of loss, iniurv. or death involving: 9. Alquist-Priolo Special Studies or County Fault Hazard Zones Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault • Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? A-P Zones NA ✓ PS U R CFH Zones NA ✓ PS U R Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 10. Liquefaction Potential Zone Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? • NA ✓ S PS U R Source: SJGP (MEA-IV-6) Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 11. Groundshaking Zone Strong seismic ground shaking? • NA✓S PS U R 12 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: SJGP (MEA-IV-6) Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: Building Department 12. Landslide Risk NA S PS U R Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, collapse, or rockfall hazards? • Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 13. Ground Subsidence Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in ground subsidence? • Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 14. Other Geologic Hazards • Such as seiche, mudflow or volcanic hazard? 13 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: b. Would the project: 15. Slopes a) Change topography or ground surface relief features? • b) Create cut or fill slopes greater than 2:1 or higher than 10 feet? • c) Result in grading that affects or negates subsurface sewage disposal systems? • Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 16. Soils a) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? • b) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? • Source: Findings of Fact No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring_ 14 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated 17. Erosion a) Change deposition, siltation or erosion which • may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of a lake? b) Result in any increase in water erosion either on or off site? • Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 18. Wind Erosion and Blowsand from project either on or off site • Be impacted by or result in an increase in wind erosion and blowsand, either on or off site? Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project 19. Hazards and Hazardous Materials a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? • b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? • c) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan? • 15 d) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? e) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Source: Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated • • Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 20. Airports a) Result in an inconsistency with an Airport Master Plan? • b) Require review by the Airport Land Use Commission? • c) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? • d) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, or heliport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? • Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 16 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated 21. Hazardous Fire Area Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? • Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY would the project 22. Water Quality Impacts a) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? • b) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? • c) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? • d) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted • runoff? e) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? • f) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? • 17 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated g) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? • Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 23. Floodplains NA U R • a) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? b) Changes in absorption rates or the rate and amount of surface runoff? • c) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of Toss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam (Dam Inundation Area)? • d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? • Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: LAND USE/PLANNING would the project 24. Land Use a) Result in a substantial alteration of the present or • planned land use of an area? b) Affect land use within a city sphere of influence and/or within adjacent city or county boundaries? • 18 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 25. Planning a) Be consistent with the site's existing or proposed zoning? • b) Be compatible with existing surrounding zoning? • c) Be compatible with existing and planned surrounding land uses? • d) Be consistent with the land use designations and policies of the Comprehensive General Plan (including those of any applicable Specific Plan)? • e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low- income or minority community)? • Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: MINERAL RESOURCES Would the project 26. Mineral Resources a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource in an area classified or designated by the State that would be of value to the region or the residents of the • State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally - important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? • 19 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated c) Be an incompatible land use located adjacent to a State classified or designated area or • existing surface mine? d) Expose people or property to hazards from proposed, existing or abandoned quarries • or mines? Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: NOISE Would the project result in oise cceptability Ratings Where indicated below, the appropriate Noise Acceptability Rating(s) has been underlined. NA - Not Applicable A - Generally Acceptable B - Conditionally Acceptable C - Generally Unacceptable D - Land Use Discouraged 27. Airport Noise Definitions for N A a) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? NA ✓ A B C D b) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? NA✓ A B C D • • 20 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 28. Railroad Noise • NAVABCD Source: SJGP Findings of Fact: Mitigation: None Monitoring: 29. Highway Noise • NAVABCD Source: SJGP (MEA-II-2) Findings of Fact: Mitigation: None Monitoring: 30. Other Noise • NA A B C D Source: Findings of Fact: Mitigation: Monitoring: 31. Noise Effects on or by the Project a) A substantial permanent increase in ambient • noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? b) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity • above levels existing without the project? 21 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated c) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? • d) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? • Source: Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the project 32. Housing a) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? • b) Create a demand for additional housing, particularly housing affordable to households eaming 80% or less of the County's median income? • c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? • d) Affect a City Redevelopment Project Area? • e) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? • f) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? • Source: SJGP Findings of Fact: The effect of this proposal is not expected to increase population or its distribution Mitigation: None Monitoring: 22 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities or the need for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 33. Fire Services 1 1 Source: SJGP Findings of Fact: The effect of this proposal is not expected to increase the demand for Fire services. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 34. Police Services Source: SJGP Findings of Fact: The effect of this proposal is not expected to increase the demand for Police Services. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 35. Schools • • • Source: SJGP Findings of Fact: The effect of this proposal is not expected to increase the demand for schools. Mitigation: Monitoring: 36. Libraries Source: SJGP Findings of Fact: The effect of this proposal is not expected to increase the demand for libraries. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 37. Health Services Source: SJGP Findings of Fact: The effect of this proposal is not expected to increase the demand for health services. Mitigation: Monitoring: • • RECREATION 23 t"M: atoex,,fe.e. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AlNDA ITEM #: 3.1 SUBJECT: firKe-A-r-D 46/6-5 S 6Lp/ion-A) n Co(t) IN OPPOSITION: CI IN FAVOR: 0 NEUTRAL: 1V-1144-Li Lev g-L1 Representing: U-11-1-1 ED So .36 - bre) Name: Address: City: a.,i Telephone No.: Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #. DATE: 61.6 647, IN FAVOR: D Name: S4fsel, gA4 \ca-1NA SUBJECT: C NEUTRAL: D IN OPPOSITIO : D tl Representing: 3&LF Address: /27g03i) City:, 99/45 174 NA7:::C> Telephone No.: lig 7-e)71 • VS' UstPZ flAk51 .1) ucrvt.ww./vu,../ REQUEST TO SPEAK Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. -it2 r C,ewlimeAcii-c) REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: C2 SUBJECT: fJI20 DATE: IN FAVOR: CI Name: 0 Representing: NEUTRAL: (7 12-43e5 IN OPPOSITION: Address: f2 7 City: Telephone No.: `---4 44 3 3 Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. tt-e2 1-4AcovwedfLis) REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: SUBJECT: c\ 3\1\\OCS \ff)D c cyoczo DATE: Name: IN FAVOR: 0 NEUTRAL: 0 cr--\ c.:270\c-3 IN OPPOSITION: 0 Representing: Address: \T' 07S kiVer\i`c\-12..i c\/Nctc, $2_, City: C)COM 13A...C--nNI-\:"A--0 Telephone No.:0 0°7 Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR T OF THE MEETING. THE START 1)/1 REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: SUBJECT: LLPLn DATE: IN FAVOR: 0 Name: DV, n690-z.D NEUTRAL: 0 IN OPPOSITION: Ut--- Representing: Address: F-7 -59 o,n 16.//1 Telephone No.: Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated 38. Parks and Recreation a) Would the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? • b) Would the project include the use of existing neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? • c) Is the project located within a C.S.A. or recreation and park district with a Community Parks and Recreation Plan (Quimby fees)? • Source: SJGP Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services. No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 39. Recreational Trails. Source: SJGP Findings of Fact: The effect of this proposal is not expected to increase the demand for recreational trails Mitigation: None Monitoring: • TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Would the project 40. Circulation a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic Toad and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? • b) Result in inadequate parking capacity? • c) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated road or highways? • 24 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated d) Result in a change in air traffic pattems, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? • e) Alter waterbome, rail or air traffic? • f) Substantially increase hazards to a design feature (e.g. , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? • g) Cause an effect upon, or a need for new or altered maintenance of roads? • h) Cause an effect upon circulation during the project's construction? • i) Result in inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? • j) Conflict with adopted policies supporting altemative transportation (e.g. bus tumouts, bicycle racks)? • Source: SJGP Findings of Fact: No environmental impacts are envisioned as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment because the project involves only the development of appropriate locations, site development standards, and permit requirements to allow wireless telecommunications services No development projects are currently proposed the environmental effects of such projects will be evaluated and specific mitigation measures, if needed will be required. Mitigation: None Monitoring: Building & Safety 41. Bike Trails Source: Findings of Fact: The effect of this proposal is not expected to increase the demand for bike trails. Mitigation: None Monitoring: • UTILITY AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project 42. Water a) Require or result in the construction of new water treatment facilities or • expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects? 25 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are • new or expanded entitlements needed? Source: Findings of Fact: The effect of this proposal is not expected to increase the demand for water services. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 43. Sewer a) Require or result in the construction of new wastewater treatment facilities, including • septic systems, or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental effects? b) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may service the project that it has adequate • capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Source: Findings of Fact: The effect of this proposal is not expected to increase the demand for sewer services. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 44. Solid Waste a) Is the project served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the projects solid waste disposal needs? • b) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid wastes (including the CIWMP (County Integrated • Waste Management Plan)? Source: Findings of Fact: The effect of this proposal is not expected to increase the demand for solid waste services. Mitigation: None Monitoring: 26 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated 45. Utilities Would the project impact the following facilities requiring or resulting in the construction of new facilities or the expansion of existing facilities; the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? a) Electricity? • b) Natural gas? • c) Communications systems? • d) Storm water drainage? • e) Street lighting? • i) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? • g) Other govemmental services? • h) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? • Source: Findings of Fact: The appropriate agencies have been contacted with regard to this project. Mitigation: None Monitoring: OTHER 46. Other: • Source: Findings of Fact: Mitigation: Monitoring: 47. Other: Source: Findings of Fact: Mitigation: Monitoring: 48. Other Source: Findings of Fact: Mitigation: Monitoring: • • 27 Less than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant with Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Incorporated MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 49. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal • community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare, or endangered plant or animal to eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? ource: Findings of Fact: This review indicates that no substantial impact on the environment or habitat of fish or wildlife would occur 50. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is • one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) ource: Findings of Fact: No short-term or long term impacts on the environment are expected. 51. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects as defined in Califomia Code of • Regulations, Section 15130)? ource: Findings of Fact: No impacts are expected 52. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on • human beings, either directly or indirectly? Source: i nis review Findings of Fact: Nor direct or indirect impacts on human beings are expected 28 VI. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. California Code of Regulations, Section 15063 (c) (3) (D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: Earlier Analyses Used, if any: Location Where Earlier Analyses, if used, are available for review: 29 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) ORDINANCE NO: 1101-02-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ADDING SECTION 23.76, WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES, TO THE SAN JACINTO ZONING ORDINANCE, ORDINANCE No. 340 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. On March 13, 2002, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended approval of an ordinance amendment to adding Section 23.76, Wireless Telecommunication Facilities, to the San Jacinto zoning ordinance, Ordinance No. 340. Section 2. General Plan Consistency Findings. The City Council of the City of San Jacinto hereby finds and determines: A. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented, the City Council finds the Text Amendment is consistent with the General Plan of the City of San Jacinto because it provides guidelines for development of Wireless Telecommunication Facilities in the City. Thus, the Text Amendment helps to promote and achieve the following General Plan policies: 1. Land Use Policy 6A(2): Encourage and support an adequate levels of public services to meet the need of the existing and future planned population. The proposed ordinance specifically encourages new wireless telecommunication facilities to consider the characteristics of the area. B. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented, the City Council finds this Text Amendment is reasonably related to the public welfare of the citizens of the City of San Jacinto and the surrounding region because it establishes standards for the approval of wireless telecommunication facilities in the City and establishes standards for compatibility. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the project could not have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, adoption of a Negative Declaration is recommended. City Staff is directed to file a Notice of Determination within 5 days of this Ordinance. Section 4. Article 23, GENERAL PROVISIONS, CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS is hereby amended by adding Section 23.76, Wireless Telecommunication Facilities, to read as follows: Section 23.76 - Wireless Telecommunication Facilities 1. Wireless Telecommunication Facilities are subject to the following: a. Applications for Wireless Telecommunication Facilities are subject to a two -level review process as provided in this section. Applications for Wireless Telecommunication Facilities are subject to either: i. Approval by the Project Review Committee (PRC) consisting of the City Manager or a designated representative and the City Engineer or; ii. Planning Commission approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Those applications that meet the design and development guidelines outlined below will require approval of the Project Review Committee (PRC). Those applications that require a CUP and do not meet all the design and development guidelines outlined below require a PRC review and approval by the Planning Commission at a noticed public hearing. 2. Project Review Committee (PRC) review: The PRC shall approve Wireless Telecommunication Facilities only if it finds as follows: a. Antenna are located in a commercial or industrial zone; and b. Building or roof mounted antenna not exceeding 15 feet in height and architecturally screened from view; and c. Antenna that are stealth design in connection with a structure so as not to be recognized as an antenna, appropriate types of structures may include, but are not limited to: buildings, water tanks, telephone and utility towers, poles, sign standards, traffic signals, light standards and roadway overpasses; and d. Support equipment is located within a completely enclosed structure or otherwise screened from view; and e. Antenna meet all development standards within the applicable zone as required by this code; and f. Antenna will be, if reasonably possible, collocated with an existing site such as a utility substation or cellular facility in an industrial or commercial zone. 2 Planning Commission Review: Wireless Telecommunication Facilities which cannot be approved by the PRC in accordance with the PRC criteria are subject to a Conditional Use Permit and Planning Commission Review. The following are also subject to a CUP: a. Ground mounted antenna (monopole); b. Proposed facilities that create more than a minimal visual impact on surroundings as determined by the City Manager or a designated representative. In determining where more than a minimal visual impact exists, the following factors should be considered: location of facility, size and view of facility from adjacent properties and contrast between the facility and other external structural equipment attached to the property; c. Facilities located adjacent to a residential zone; d. Facilities located within the line of sight of any scenic corridor. Locational Guidelines: All application for Wireless Telecommunication Facilities are subject to the following Iocational guidelines: a. The preferred order of Wireless Telecommunication Facilities is as follows: i. Industrial zones, and then ii. Commercial zones. If proposed with in a Specific Plan (SP) zone, the preferred land use designation order of placement is (1) Industrial zones (2) Business Parks, and then (3) Commercial Zones; iii. Agricultural zones b. Wireless Telecommunication Facilities can be approved within a residential zone provided the property is not developed with a single family dwelling unit. Consideration of potential impacts on any residential property will be evaluated. The location of a Wireless Telecommunication Facility will be conditioned to the utilization of stealth design technology and or building or roof mounted design; c. Wireless Telecommunication Facilities shall i. Be co -located with another structure, where appropriate ii. Utilize stealth designs iii. Be roof or wall mounted as an integral architectural element on an existing structure, and iv. Utilize state-of-the-art stealth technology; 3 d. The applicant is to investigate the feasibility of co -location additional antenna on the tops of buildings, on existing monopoles, and/or clustering facilities. If co -location or clustering is not possible in the case if a particular proposal, the applicant shall submit evidence at the time of the submittal. With the submittal of the Conditional Use Permit application, the applicant is to submit a copy of the appropriate portion of the tentative lease agreement indicating that no exclusive agreements have been made to prevent future carriers to locate on the same site or facility, as well as submit a design plan which does not preclude potential additional owners; e. Monopoles shall be separated a minimum of 1000 feet from any existing monopoles. 5. Development and Design Guidelines: All applications for Wireless Telecommunications Facilities shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. The applicant shall submit plans that will be reviewed for all applicable zoning codes and standards. The following is intended to provide high quality guidelines to ensure compatibility with the community for the placement of Wireless Telecommunication Facilities: a. All individuals, companies and providers of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities shall provide a master plan of all existing and proposed sites. The plans shall indicate the type of facility, its height above ground level and its cell coverage; b. Support structures shall be screened from view by siting them next to tall buildings or placed near existing tall trees. Where applicable the support structures are to be screened from public view with dense landscaping; c. Wireless Telecommunication Facilities are required to meet all the applicable zoning setbacks and height regulations of the underlying zone; d. Wireless Telecommunication facilities may be designed as or within a piece of public art such as a entry monument or historical structure for public benefit; e. The height of the support structures must be the minimum necessary to provide the required coverage. However, an antenna or its support structure shall not exceed the height in any zone as prescribed by the zoning code; f. Safety lighting or colors, if prescribed by the City or other approving agency (i.e. FAA), may be required for support structures; g. Support structures shall be either galvanized steel or painted an unobtrusive color to neutralize and blend with surroundings. Where 4 equipment buildings accompanies the support structure, it shall be designed, colored and textured to match adjacent architecture or blend in with surrounding development; h. A proposed wireless facility shall not create any non -conforming situations to the site as such a reduction in parking, landscaping, loading zones, and/or elimination of loading zones. Wireless Telecommunication Facilities are to be installed and maintained in compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Electrical Code, Noise Standards and other applicable codes; No existing or future wireless telecommunication facilities shall interfere with any public safety radio communications system. If such facilities are found to interfere with a public safety radio communications system, or any system facilitating the transmission or relay of voice or data information for public safety, the facility operator shall immediately cease operation of the facility. Operation of the facility shall only be allowed to resume upon removal or other resolution of interference to the satisfaction of the City. j. Whip and microwave dish antenna are permitted only if integrated into the design if the structure and/or fully screened from public view; k. All utilities associated with wireless telecommunication facilities shall be underground; I. Chain link fencing is not permitted for containment of Wireless Telecommunication Facilities, unless such fencing is located in the rear portion of the facility and is not visible from a public right of way; m. Temporary monopoles, if associated with an approved Wireless Telecommunication Facilities application, maybe permitted, if justified to the satisfaction of the City Manager or a designated representative for a period of up to three (3) months, provided that screening is installed to prevent view of the monopole and related facilities from any and all public rights of way; n. Lattice towers shall not be permitted within the City boundaries; o. The facility operator or property owner is responsible for maintaining the facility in an appropriate manner consistent with the original approval of the Wireless Telecommunication Facility. Should the use be replaced or discontinued for a period of six months, the approvals will lapse. 5 Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 6th day of June, 2002. MOVED, PASSED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 20th Day of June, 2002 by the following vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk 6 City of San Jacinto AGENDA ITEM 4. 1 June 6, 2002 TO: The Honorable City Council NL FROM: Bernard Simon, Finance Director SUBJECT: Accept the Engineer's Report and Declare the Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments Within Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1 and Give Notice of and Set the Time and Place of the Public Hearing on the Levy of the Proposed Assessment RECOMMENDATION By motion, accept the Engineer's Report and Adopt Resolution No. _ declaring the City's Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments Within Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1 for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 and Giving Notice of and Setting the Time and Place of the Hearing on the Levy of the Proposed Assessment. BACKGROUND: The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, requires that the City annually adopt an engineering report substantiating the need for the levy and assessment, set a public hearing to approve the engineering report, and set the assessment for the current fiscal year. The amount of the levy on each parcel will remain the same as it was for fiscal year 2001-2002. Articles XIIIC and XIID of the California Constitution require a vote of the residents of the district in order to increase the assessments. It is anticipated that the cost of the district will exceed the costs recovered from the levy of assessments. The fiscal year 2002-2003 budget contains a subsidy of approximately $230,000 from the General Fund in order to continue the current level of service to the district. JUSTIFICATION: The adoption of this resolution is required in order to continue the assessment for the district. BUDGETARY IMPACT: None. This action will accept the Engineer's report and set the City Council meeting of July 18, 2002, as the date of the public hearing to set the assessments. 1 ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002-2003 AND GIVING NOTICE OF AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE OF THE HEARING ON THE LEVY OF THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, RESOLVES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, on June 16, 1992 the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, ("City") adopted Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1 pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code (the "Act"), for the maintenance and servicing of street lights, landscaping, parkways and median islands; and WHEREAS, in November 1996 the voters of the State of California passed Proposition 218 which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution requiring, among other things, new procedures for the approval of the levying of assessments against real property; and WHEREAS, Article XIIID of the California Constitution requires that assessments comply with stated procedural and approval provisions by July 1, 1997, unless an assessment district meets certain exemptions as set forth in Section 5 of the Article which exemptions include the following: "(a) any assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage system or vector control." "(b) any assessment imposed pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment is initially imposed;" and WHEREAS, the District assessments proposed for the 2002-2003 Fiscal Year are exempt from Proposition 218 because the assessments either generate revenue for the operation and maintenance of streets and highways, all expenditures thereunder qualifying as street maintenance as defined by the State of California or they were approved by petition of the property owners when the assessments were originally imposed; and LLPD No. 1 Resolution of Intention WHEREAS, the Act also requires that the City comply with certain procedural and approval procedures before levying its annual assessments under an existing assessment district; and WHEREAS, the adoption of this Resolution, among other things, is required in order to levy the proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 2002-2003 for the District; and WHEREAS, by said Resolution the City Council ordered John Friedrich, RCE, the person designated by this Council as the Engineer of Work for the District to file a report with the City Clerk in accordance with the Act; and WHEREAS, Mr. Friedrich has filed such report with the City Clerk, and such report has been presented to and was considered by the City Council. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined, and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby declares that it is its intention to levy and collect assessments for The District during the Fiscal Year 2002-2003 pursuant to the Act. The area to be assessed is located in the City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, California. The boundaries of The District are described in Exhibit A attached hereto. SECTION 2. The purpose of the District is for maintenance and servicing of landscaping, irrigation, parkways, medians, and street lighting. SECTION 3. The report filed by Mr. Friedrich which is on file with the City Clerk and which has been considered by the City Council at the meeting at which this Resolution has been adopted, is hereby accepted. All interested persons are referred to that report for a full and detailed description of the work, the boundaries of the proposed assessment district, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land with the District. SECTION 4. The Fiscal Year 2002-2003 assessments in each benefit zone within Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1 are the same as the Fiscal Year 2001-2002 assessments. SECTION 5. On Thursday, July 18, 2002, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter, during the course of its regularly scheduled meeting, the City Council will conduct a public hearing on the question of the levy of the proposed annual assessment. The hearing will be held at the San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room at 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall give notice of the time and place of said hearing by publishing a copy of this Resolution once in the Hemet News not less than ten (10) days before the date of the hearing. LLPD No. 1 Resolution of Intention SECTION 7. This Resolution is adopted pursuant to Section 22622 of the Streets and Highways Code. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Mayor, City of San Jacinto ATTEST: City Clerk, City of San Jacinto APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, City of San Jacinto LLPD No. 1 Resolution of Intention day of , 2002, June 6, 2002 TO: FROM: Jake Wager, City Manag SUBJECT: Cooperative Agreement between the State of California Department of Transportation and the City of San Jacinto for the Interim Realignment of SR 79 AGENDA ITEM 4, 2 The Honorable Mayor and City Council RECOMMENDATION: Approve the revised Cooperative Agreement between the State of California Department of Transportation and the City of San Jacinto for the Interim Realignment of SR 79, and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND: Subsequent to the May 2, 2002 City Council meeting, Caltrans notified the City of San Jacinto of minor changes to the to the Cooperative Agreement between the City of San Jacinto and Caltrans for the interim realignment of SR 79. Staff and City Attorney have reviewed the changes and found them non -material and consider the agreement to be legally sufficient. For your review, please find as attachment No. 2, the redline version of the agreement approved by the City Council on May 2, 2002. Also included as attachment No. 1 is the revised agreement presented to you for approval and execution. As you may recall, this agreement is result of the City Council's request of May 18, 2000, when staff was authorized to initiate a request to California Department of Transportation to realign Highway 79 by removing it from Gilman Hot Springs road and placing it along Sanderson Avenue and Ramona Expressway. The cooperation agreement herewith presented for approval represents California Department of Transportation and City of San Jacinto agreement on the terms of the interim rerouting of SR 79. Additionally, staff has expressed to Caltrans the Council's concerns regarding access control requirements for Ramona Expressway. Caltrans has responded that these concerns can be documented in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and Caltrans, and recommend that discussions between the two agencies start as quickly as possible. RVPUBUJL 603114 -1- Regarding the second Council's concern associated with the improvements to Ramona Expressway from State Street to Sanderson Avenue, Caltrans has responded that District 8 will pursue the transfer of funds from the Potrero Bridge project to improvements to the newly proposed interim SR 79. However, the final outcome will depend on the statewide needs, priorities, and available funding (See attached letter from Anne E. Mayer, District Director dated May 21, 2002). This agreement will take effect immediately upon California Transportation Commission approval, which is anticipated to take place at the July 2002 CTC meeting. JUSTIFICATION: This action is pursuant to Council direction. BUDGETARY IMPACT: City's associated maintenance expenditures may be reduced due to the square foot of road being transferred. ATTACHMENTS: 1 — Cooperative Agreement 2 — Redline Version of Agreement 3 — Letter from Anne E. Mayer dated May 21, 2002 RVPUBV1L\603114 -2- APPROVED AS TO FORM WITH CHANGES & COMMENTS Date: April 24, 2002 DENNY FONG State Cooperative Agreement Coordinator (916) 653-3696 ATSS: 8-453-3696 District Agreement No. 8-1183 08-Riv-79- KP 48.08/R49.69 Transfer of Highway Location in the City of San Jacinto 08303 - 1A770K District Agreement No. 08- 1183 Note: Please fill out our Coop Agreement Fact Sheet and submit. Also, cite the authorizing approved document that supports this agreement. Note: Texts that are blue and crossed, and in red are by the District. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT, entered into on is between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, referred to herein as "STATE", and CITY OF SAN JACINTO a body politic and a municipal corporation of the State of California, Referred to herein as "CITY". RECITALS 1. STATE and CITY, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Sections 73 and 81, are authorized to enter into a Cooperative Agreement providing for relinquishment to CITY of a portion of State Highway 79 within City of San Jacinto- and adopting a portion of CITY highway into the State highway system. 2. STATE desires to relinquish to CITY that portion of Route 79, described on Exhibit "A", between the south city limit of the City of San Jacinto, KP 48.08 (PM 29.881), to the north city limits of the City of San Jacinto KP 49.69 (PM 30.88) referred to herein as RELINQUISHMENT, and CITY is willing to accept said RELINQUISHMENT. 'Exhibit "A" not found. Please include for review and for a complete agreentent.J 3. CITY desires to relinquish to STATE, for the purpose of transferring accepting into the State highway system (Route 79) location, that portion of Ramona Expressway, described on Exhibit "A", beginning at the intersection of State Street and Ramona Expressway in the City of San Jacinto, thence to the intersection of Sanderson Avenue and Ramona Expressway, together with the west half of Sanderson Avenue, north of Ramona Expressway and ending at the San Jacinto River, referred to herein as TRANSFER, and STATE is willing to accept said TRANSFER. District Agreement No. 8-1183 [Legal's contntent to Art. 3: This is unclear. Is it the intention to accept the portion of Ramona Expressway into the State highway system? If so, what route is involved? Is it Route 79? What is the authority for State to accept transfer?] 4. STATE and CITY have reached an understanding on the work necessary to place the State highway in a state of good repair and have agreed to the amount of $0.00 as the total compensation to be paid to CITY in consideration of RELINQUISHMENT. 5. STATE and CITY have reached an understanding on the work necessary to place the city streets in a state of good repair and have agreed to the amount of $0.00 as the total compensation to be paid to STATE in consideration of TRANSFER. 6. STATE is willing to accept TRANSFER "as is", without payment, to satisfy STATE's obligation to place the RELINQUISHMENT in a state of good repair. 7. CITY is willing to accept RELINQUISHMENT "as is", without payment, to satisfy CITY's obligation to place the -TRANSFER in a state of good repair. 8. TRANSFER will occur upon approval by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) of a Resolution of Transfer of Highway Location and recording of a certified copy of said resolution in the Riverside County Recorder's Office. TRANSFER shall become effective the day following the recordation of said resolution. 9. That portion of Route 79 affected by RELINQUISHMENT under this action shall cease to be a state highway upon the effective date of RELINQUISHMENTTRANSFER. 10. Those portions of Ramona Expressway and Sanderson Avenue affected by TRANSFER under this action shall become a state highway upon the effective date of TRANSFER. 11. The parties hereto desire to define herein the terms and conditions under which RELINQUISHMENT and TRANSFER are to be accomplished. SECTION I CITY AGREES: 1. Execution of this Agreement constitutes CITY's waiver of the ninety (90) days' notice of "Intention to Relinquish" requirement contained in Section 73 of the Streets and Highways Code. 2. To accept RELINQUISHMENT, as described in RECITALS, Article 2 upon approval by the CTC of the terms of this Agreement and recording of a resolution. 2 District Agreement No. 8-1183 3. To relinquish TRANSFER to the STATE for the purpose of becoming State Route 79, described in RECITALS, Article 3 upon approval by the CTC of the terms of this Agreement and recordation of resolution recording of said resolution in the County Recorders Office. , , , . Are there no CITY ri lit o way involved?] , •, . operate the traffc signal at Chase St,.eet and Rarnona Expre^^..,^. [see Art. 4 comment] e and repair of the [see Art. 4 comment] 7. To accept ownership, maintenance, operation and liability of RELINQUISHMENT "as is", without payment. CITY shall accept RELINQUISHMENT and all rights, title and interest in, without any additional cost to STATE. 8. The portion of Route 79 relinquished to the -CITY under this agreement may not be considered for future adoption under Section 81 of the Streets and Highways Code. 10. To relocate all signing referencing Route 79 from RELINQUISHMENT to the TRANSFER with the exception of that signing required to be maintained in Article 8 (Article 8 does not refer to maintenance of signing! Do you mean Article 11?) of this section I of this Agreement. All materials relocated or moved shall become the property of STATE. 11. To provide and maintain signing as determined necessary by STATE through the STATE's encroachment permit process, at CITY expense, along that portion of Route 79, retained by STATE when future construction projects are proposed and constructed by CITY; and in STATE's judgement result in potential or actual adverse impact on STATE highway traffic or result in an increased risk of liability due to impact of CITY's construction on highway maintenance or operation within STATE right of way. [see conzment on Article 14 of Section III. If maintenance is for some future work, which doesn't exist, it doesn't belong in this agreement. Clar.] 3 District Agreement No. 8-1183 12. To accept and maintain RELINQUISHMENT in a manner consistent with good maintenance practices (This. facility will be theirs. Why are we telling them how to maintain it). SECTION II STATE AGREES: 1. To relinquish that portion of State Route 79, described in RECITALS, Article 2 to CITY, "as is", without payment; for placing the RELINQUISHMENT in a state of good repair, upon approval by the CTC of the terms of this Agreement and recordation of resolution. 2. To accept TRANSFER "as is" as described in RECITALS, Article 3, and to accept all rights, title and interest in, without any additional cost to CITY for placing TRANSFER in a state of good repair, upon approval by the CTC of the terms of this Agreement and recordation of resolution. 3. To deliver to CITY, all records and files for the RELINQUISHMENT, including, but not limited to plans, accident records, maintenance records, traffic signal timing data, survey data and right of way information within four (4) months after recordation of resolution. conduits, conductors, safety equipment, s-igns, etc. necessary to operate the traffic signal at State Street and Ramona Expressway,. /Are there no CITY right of way involved?] conduits, conductors, safety equipment, signs, etc. necessary to operate the traffic signal at Chase Street and Ramona Expre way. fsee Article 4 comment] 6. To provide traffic control: including road closures, ramp closures, advanced warning, for streets leading to and from the remaining portion of Route 79 in the event of emergency shutdown, maintenance or safety repairs to Route 79, at no cost to CITY. SECTION III IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED: 1. All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature, approval of terms and conditions within this agreement and the allocation of resources by the CTC, provided that City shall not accept RELINQUISHMENT unless and until such appropriation, approval and allocation has occurred, as provided herein. 4 District Agreement No. 8-1183 2. Relative to actions subsequent to RELINQUISHMENT and TRANSFER, neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless the State of California, all officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.0) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. 3. Relative to actions subsequent to prior to RELINQUISHMENT and TRANSFER, neither CITY nor any official, officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless the CITY, all officials, officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.0) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. .I.CITY will accept liability, if any, based eri ownership of RELINQUISHMENT only as to incidents that occur on or after the date that the CITY accepts ownership of RELINQUISHMENT. STATE will accept liability, if any, based on ownership of the RELINQUISHMENT for any and all incidents that occur prior to the date that the CITY accepts ownership of RELINQUISHMENT, even if the claim or lawsuit, based on such incident, is not made or filed until after the date the CITY accepts ownership of RELINQUISHMENT. 5.STATE accept liability, if any, based on-awner-ship-ofTRANSFER only as to incidents that v fter the !late that the STATE aeee is ownership-ef the TRANSFER. CITY will accept liability, if any, based on ownership of TRANS -PER for any and all incidents that occur prior to the date that the STATE accepts ownership of the transfer, even if the claim or lawsuit, based on such incident, is not made or filed until after the date the STATE accepts ownership of TRANSFER. 6,4. Upon TRANSFER and acceptance by STATE, CITY will maintain at CITY expense, the landscaping, irrigation,and fences and 3af t,. lightinn including lamp ^nd Fvt a replocement for the TRANSFER. [Why is the CITY doing maintenance within STATE right of way? Please clarify.] District Agreement No. 8-1183 5. CITY will accept maintenance at CITY expense the responsibility of mowing annual vegetative growth between and within the right of way and edge of paved shoulder highway pavement of TRANSFER. f Why is the CITY doing maintenance within STATE right of way? Clarify.] 8.6. CITY shall obtain a yearly permit, at no cost to tICITY, for the maintenance of the landscaping, irrigation, and fences within STATE right of way. [see comments, for above Arzicals 6 and 7] 9-:7. Prior to the transfer of Sanderson Avenue and Ramona Expressway, an electrical a separate maintenance agreement, defining maintenance and electrical energy costs, shall he in plate executed with STATE's Electrical Maintenance Department. 10.8. STATE will accept maintenance, at STATE cost and expense, of the traffic signal, including conduit and conductor replacement at Chase Street and Ramona Expressway. CITY will accept maintenance at CITY expense the costs for electrical energy for traffic signals and allsafety lighting along Ramona Expressway, except for that the intersection safety lighting; on the transferred highway shall be maintained by CITY. CITY will finish intersection imptevenients-plaeing-eenerete-eutb-m-asphalt-hetm-te-S-TAT-E-standatd-at-the-seathwest corner of this location.[see comments for Articals 6 and 7/ 9- Upon TRANSFER, STATE will maintain at STATE expense, the traffic signal equipment, lighting appurtenances including conduit and conductor replacement for the traffic signal at Sanderson Avenue and Ramona Expressway. Charges for electrical energy necessary to operate the traffic signal and safety lighting will be at CITY expense. CITY will accept maintenance of local roads within STATE's right of way delegated to the CITY for maintenance. 12.10. CITY will accept maintenance of local roads outside of within STATE's right of way t CITY f . m ntenanee nelude all r ght of way between the edge of existing pavement on TRANSFER and the limits of right of way. 13.11. No alteration of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on any of the parties hereto. 11.12. STATE may commence construction of future improvements for a Project project along the TRANSFER corridor, with STATE performing contract administration at no cost to City CITY through completion. CITY, by permit as part of this process, shall will continue to maintain TRANSFER between the outer edge of paved shoulder pavement -and the limits of right of way.[Agreements with the CITY for a future project should be separate and not be made a part of this relinquishment and transfer agreement. Revise article. Also, see continents for Articles 6 and 7.] 6 District Agreement No. 8-1183 1-5713. This agreement shall terminate upon recordation of resolution, for this portion of Route 79, or on October 1, 2006, whichever is earlier in time; provided, however, that all provisions pertaining to the operation, construction, maintenance, repair, liability, indemnity and claims clauses shall remain in effect until terminated or modified, in writing, by mutual agreement. Note: Signatures are on the following page. 7 District Agreement No. 8-1183 STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF SAN JACINTO Department Of Transportation JEFF MORALES By: Director of Transportation Mayor By: Attest: ANNE MAYER City Clerk District Director APPROVED AS TO FORMS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND AND PROCEDURE: PROCEDURE: Attorney Attorney (or Counsel) Department of Transportation City of San Jacinto CERTIFIED AS TO FUNDS: District Budget Manager CERTIFIED AS TO FINANCIAL TERMS AND POLICIES: Accounting Administrator 8 08-Riv-79- KP 48.08/R49.69 Transfer of Highway Location in the City of San Jacinto 08303 - 1A770K District Agreement No. 08- 1183 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT, entered into on is between the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department of Transportation, referred to herein as "STATE", and CITY OF SAN JACINTO a body politic and a municipal corporation of the State of California, Referred to herein as "CITY". RECITALS 1. STATE and CITY, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Sections 73 and 81, are authorized to enter into a Cooperative Agreement providing for relinquishment to CITY of a portion of State Highway 79 within City of San Jacinto and adopting a portion of CITY highway into the State highway system. 2. STATE desires to relinquish to CITY that portion of Route 79 within CITY, described on Exhibit "A", between the intersection of State Street and Ramona Expressway, KP 48.08 (PM 29.88), to the north city limits of the City of San Jacinto KP 49.68 (PM 30.88) referred to herein as RELINQUISHMENT, and CITY is willing to accept said RELINQUISHMENT. 3. CITY desires to relinquish to STATE, for the purpose of accepting into the State highway system (Route 79), that portion of Ramona Expressway, described on Exhibit "A", beginning at the intersection of State Street and Ramona Expressway in the City of San Jacinto, thence to the intersection of Sanderson Avenue and Ramona Expressway, together with the west half of Sanderson Avenue, north of Ramona Expressway and ending at the San Jacinto River, referred to herein as TRANSFER, and STATE is willing to accept said TRANSFER. 4. STATE and CITY have reached an understanding on the work necessary to place the State highway in a state of good repair and have agreed to the amount of $0.00 as the total compensation to be paid to CITY in consideration of RELINQUISHMENT. District Agreement No. 8-1183 5. STATE and CITY have reached an understanding on the work necessary to place the city streets in a state of good repair and have agreed to the amount of $0.00 as the total compensation to be paid to STATE in consideration of TRANSFER. 6. STATE is willing to accept TRANSFER "as is", without payment, to satisfy STATE's obligation to place RELINQUISHMENT in a state of good repair. 7. CITY is willing to accept RELINQUISHMENT "as is", without payment, to satisfy CITY's obligation to place TRANSFER in a state of good repair. 8. TRANSFER will occur upon approval by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) of a Resolution of Transfer of Highway Location and recording of a certified copy of said resolution in the Riverside County Recorder's Office. TRANSFER shall become effective the day following the recordation of said resolution. 9. That portion of Route 79 affected by RELINQUISHMENT under this action shall cease to be a state highway upon the effective date of RELINQUISHMENT. 10. Those portions of Ramona Expressway and Sanderson Avenue affected by TRANSFER under this action shall become a state highway upon the effective date of TRANSFER. 11. The parties hereto desire to define herein the terms and conditions under which RELINQUISHMENT and TRANSFER are to be accomplished. SECTION I CITY AGREES: 1. Execution of this Agreement constitutes CITY's waiver of the ninety (90) days' notice of "Intention to Relinquish" requirement contained in Section 73 of the Streets and Highways Code. 2. To accept RELINQUISHMENT, as described in RECITALS, Article 2 upon approval by the CTC of the terms of this Agreement and recording of a resolution. 3. To relinquish TRANSFER to the STATE for the purpose of becoming State Route 79, described in RECITALS, Article 3 upon approval by the CTC of the terms of this Agreement and recording of said resolution in the County Recorders Office. 4. To accept ownership, maintenance, operation and liability of RELINQUISHMENT "as is", without payment. CITY shall accept RELINQUISHMENT and all rights, title and interest in, without any additional cost to STATE. 5. The portion of Route 79 relinquished to CITY under this agreement may not be considered for future adoption under Section 81 of the Streets and Highways Code. 2 District Agreement No. 8-1183 6. To relocate all signing referencing Route 79 from RELINQUISHMENT to the TRANSFER with the exception of that signing required to be maintained in Article 7 of this section I. All materials relocated or moved shall become the property of STATE. 7. To provide and maintain signing as determined necessary by STATE through the STATE's encroachment permit process, at CITY expense, along that portion of Route 79, retained by STATE when future construction projects are proposed and constructed by CITY; and in STATE's judgement result in potential or actual adverse impact on STATE highway traffic or result in an increased risk of liability due to impact of CITY's construction on highway maintenance or operation within STATE right of way. SECTION II STATE AGREES: 1. To relinquish that portion of State Route 79, described in RECITALS, Article 2 to CITY, "as is", without payment for placing the RELINQUISHMENT in a state of good repair upon approval by the CTC of the terms of this Agreement and recordation of resolution. 2. To accept TRANSFER "as is" as described in RECITALS, Article 3, and to accept all rights, title and interest in, without any additional cost to CITY for placing TRANSFER in a state of good repair, upon approval by the CTC of the terms of this Agreement and recordation of resolution. 3. To deliver to CITY, all records and files for the RELINQUISHMENT, including, but not limited to plans, accident records, maintenance records, traffic signal timing data, survey data and right of way information within four (4) months after recordation of resolution. 4. To provide traffic control: including road closures, ramp closures, advanced warning, for streets leading to and from the remaining portion of Route 79 in the event of emergency shutdown, maintenance or safety repairs to Route 79, at no cost to CITY. SECTION III IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED: 1. All obligations of STATE under the terms of this Agreement are subject to the appropriation of resources by the Legislature, approval of terms and conditions within this agreement and the allocation of resources by the CTC, provided that City shall not accept RELINQUISHMENT unless and until such appropriation, approval and allocation has occurred, as provided herein. District Agreement No. 8-1183 2. Relative to actions subsequent to RELINQUISHMENT, neither STATE nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless the State of California, all officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.0) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work authority or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement. 3. Relative to actions subsequent to TRANSFER, neither CITY nor any official, officer or employee thereof is responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall fully defend, indemnify and save harmless the CITY, all officials, officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined in Government Code Section 810.0) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work authority or jurisdiction delegated to STATE under this Agreement. 4. Upon TRANSFER and acceptance by STATE, CITY will maintain at CITY expense, the landscaping (including mowing of annual vegetative growth), irrigation systems, and fences between and within the right of way and edge of paved shoulder for TRANSFER. 5. CITY shall obtain a yearly permit, at no cost to CITY, for the maintenance of the landscaping, irrigation, and fences within STATE right of way. 6. Prior to the transfer of Sanderson Avenue and Ramona Expressway, a separate maintenance agreement, defining maintenance and electrical energy costs, shall be executed with STATE. 7. Upon TRANSFER, STATE will maintain, at STATE expense, the traffic signal, equipment, lighting appurtenances, including conduit and conductor replacement at Chase Street and Ramona Expressway. 8. Upon TRANSFER, STATE will maintain at STATE expense, the traffic signal equipment, lighting appurtenances including conduit and conductor replacement for the traffic signal at Sanderson Avenue and Ramona Expressway. 9. CITY will accept maintenance at, CITY expense, for the costs of electrical energy for traffic signals, street lighting and all safety lighting on the TRANSFER. 4 District Agreement No. 8-1183 10. CITY will accept maintenance, at CITY expense, for the costs of maintenance of street lighting appurtenances on TRANSFER except for maintenance of intersection safety lighting appurtenances at the traffic signals 11. No alteration of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on any of the parties hereto. 12. This agreement shall terminate upon recordation of resolution, for this portion of Route 79, or on October 1, 2006, whichever is earlier in time; provided, however, that all provisions pertaining to the operation, construction, maintenance, repair, liability, indemnity and claims clauses shall remain in effect until terminated or modified, in writing, by mutual agreement. Note: Signatures are on the following page. District Agreement No. 8-1183 STATE OF CALIFORNIA CITY OF SAN JACINTO Department Of Transportation JEFF MORALES By: Director of Transportation Mayor By: Attest: ANNE MAYER City Clerk District Director APPROVED AS TO FORMS APPROVED AS TO FORM AND AND PROCEDURE: PROCEDURE: Attorney Attorney (or Counsel) Department of Transportation City of San Jacinto CERTIFIED AS TO FUNDS: District Budget Manager CERTIFIED AS TO FINANCIAL TERMS AND POLICIES: Accounting Administrator 08-Riv-KP 48.08/R49.69 Agreement No. 08-1183 Agreement No. 08-1184 EA 1A770K Exhibit "A" an Jaen fo /.1 / ,/ RAMONA EXPWY 0 0 End KP 54.51 PM 33.88 1 • Proposed Realigned SR 79 City of San Jacinto City of Beaumont • 4 son JJ%to Riverside County ♦ ♦ er • KP 49.68 PM 30.88 KP 49.14 PM 30.54 F.,...), s0e0421 Li Legend: SR 79 to be Relinquished to the City of San Jacinto SR 79 to be Relinquished to the County of Riverside Proposed Transfer of Highway Alignment 2151•1• ® ..ita OM. ISM rQ� r Begin KP 48.08 PM 29.88 $TATE QF rAILIFORNIA—BUSINESS, TRANSPOR'. k)N AND HOUSING AGENCY ` GRAY DAVIS. Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR District 8 464 W. FOURTH STREET SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401-1400 PHONE (909) 383-4055 FAX (909) 383-6239 TTY (909) 383-6300 May 28, 2002 Mr. Jake Wager City Manager City of San Jacinto P.O. Box 488 San Jacinto, CA 92581 Dear Mr. Wager: TRANSFER OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 Flex your power! Be energy efficient! This letter is intended to address the City's concerns regarding the transfer of portions of State Route 79 (Gilman Springs Road), in exchange for portions of Ramona Expressway and Sanderson Avenue. The concerns are the pavement condition and access control on portions of Ramona Expressway. The State intends to maintain Ramona Expressway in a condition as good as or better than the roadway is currently maintained. It is the District's intent to invest the funds from the Portrero Bridge project into upgrading this portion of Ramona Expressway. This fund transfer will require departmental concurrence and California Transportation Commission (CTC) approval. Approvals are dependent on statewide need, priorities and available funding. Be assured that this project is a priority for the district and that we will actively pursue the funding approval. Ramona Expressway access control requirements can be documented in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and Caltrans. I recommend that we begin discussions as quickly as possible with the goal of having the MOU executed within one year of the transfer completion. Please call me at (909) 383-4055 to arrange a meeting to discuss the MOU and if you have additional questions. Sincerely r ANNE E. MAYER District Director c: Supervisor James A. Venable "Caltrans improves mobility across California" TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Agenda No. 4.3 June 6, 2002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk Local Appointments List (aka Maddy List) / Ratification of Mayor Conner's City Council Member Appointments / Calendar Information / City Clerkl RECOMMENDATION: 1. Update Local Appointments List (Maddy List) 2. Calendar — July 5, 2002 meeting to be adjourned to July 18, 2002. No action required until 06/20/02. BACKGROUND: Item No 1 Following the Mayor/Council reorganization of May 16, 2002 the Mayor appoints members of the City Council as representatives to other agencies and City Council Subcommittees. See the attached report. The following list gives a quick overview of the task forces, subcommittees and other necessary representation. Council Task Forces (Ad Hoc): CDBG Review Education General Plan Review Highway 79 Realignment Refuse / Recycling San Jacinto Levees Council Standing Subcommittees Standing: Civic Center Committee Economic Development Historic Preservation Public Safety Municipal Finance Committee Outside Representation: Airport Land Use Committee * Chamber Liaison EMWD Planning Task Force Groundwater Association Healthier Communities Landscape (Lighting, Landscape Parks District (LLPD) RCTC RTA Riverside County/City Selection Riverside County Disaster Council Riverside County Library Advisory San Jacinto Disaster Council SCE Franchise Senior Issues & Housing Committee Tribal Council Liaison VEDC Valley Youth Task Force WRCOG Water Issues 4th of July Parade Festival of Families Library Advisory * Recommendation only Riverside Selection Committee makes the appointment Item No 2 The first Regular Meeting in July will fall on July 4th. Resolution 99-56 instructs that when that happens the meeting falls on the following Friday (next day). Since there are several people that will be taking vacation time during that period the first meeting in July will be adjourned to the second meeting in July. JUSTIFICATION: Provide an opportunity to the Council to make any changes. This is a matter for Council's pleasure. BUDGETARY IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Council Committee Assignments as of January 3, 2002. EXHIBIT A January 3, 2002 COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES CDBG Review: Primary Mayor Williams Alternate Council Member Ayres Education: Dropped 2002 General Plan Review: Primary Council Member Carlson-Buydos Alternate Council Member Ayres Highway 79 Realignment: Primary Council Member Carlson-Buydos Alternate Council Member Ayres Refuse/Recycling: Primary Mayor Williams Alternate Vice Mayor Conner San Jacinto Levees: Primary Mayor Williams Alternate Vice Mayor Conner COUNCIL STANDING SUBCOMMITTEES Economic Development: Primary Council Member Ayres Alternate Council Member 1 Carlson-Buydos Alternate 2 Council Member Good Historic Preservation: Primary Council Member Ayres Alternate Vice Mayor Conner Public Safety: Primary Mayor Williams, Alternate Council Member Ayres, Chief Heller Municipal Finance Committee: Primary Council Member Good, Alternate Treasurer Potts Finance Director Simon Civic Center Committee: Dropped 2002 OUTSIDE COMMITTEES Chamber Liaison: Primary Council Member Ayres Alternate Vice Mayor Conner EMWD Planning Task Force: Vice Mayor Conner Groundwater Association: Healthy Communities: RCTC: RTA: Riverside County/City Selection: Riverside County Disaster Committee: San Jacinto Disaster: SCE FRANCHISE: Sr. Issues & Sr. Housing Committee: Tribal Council Liaison VEDC: WRCOG Water Issues: 4th of July Parade: Primary Council Member Carlson-Buydos Alternate Vice Mayor Conner Council Member Good Primary Council Member Carlson-Buydos Alternate Vice Mayor Conner Primary Council Member Ayres Alternate Council Member Good Mayor Williams Mayor Williams Mayor Williams Commander Simmons City Manager Wager Finance Director Simon Planning Director Hults Riverside County Fire Battalion Chief Barron Riverside County Fire Battalion Chief Barron Primary Vice Mayor Conner Alternate Council Member Good Dropped Primary Mayor Williams Alternate Vice Mayor Conner Primary Council Member Ayres Alternate 1 Vice Mayor Conner Alternate 2 Council Member Good Primary Vice Mayor Conner Alternate Council Member Carlson-Buydos Primary Vice Mayor Conner Alternate Council Member Carlson-Buydos Council Member Ayres Festival of Families Mayor Williams Library Advisory Landscape LLMD Primary Vice Mayor Conner Alternate San Jacinto Librarian Primary Council Member Good Alternate Council Member Carlson-Buydos Airport Land Use Committee: Mayor Williams, Treasurer Potts (designated by Riverside County City Selection Committee) AGENDA NO. 4.4 June 6, 2002 To: The Honorable City Council �y� FROM: Tim Hults, Planning Director`ri SUBJECT: Amendment No. 5 to Development Agreement 1-89 RECOMMENDATION: Approve Amendment No. 5 to Development Agreement 1-89, thereby authorizing an extension of time to October 17, 2002. BACKGROUND: On January 17, 2002 the Council granted an extension of time to June 19, 2002 for Development Agreement 1-89, between the City and PR Equities related to the development of the Rancho San Jacinto Specific Plan. The extension of time was granted to allow for Staff and the majority bondholder to accomplish one of three things: 1. Negotiate an extended Development Agreement with essentially the same terms as exists; or 2. Negotiate an extended Development Agreement with modified terms acceptable to both parties; or 3. Negotiate a new Development Agreement reflecting a mutually agreed to approach to future development. To date, significant progress has taken place with regard to moving the specific plan development activity forward. Staff is currently processing four tentative subdivision maps for the areas north of Washington Avenue, west of Meridian Street. Two additional subdivision requests will be submitted in the next couple of weeks. The six subdivisions are within an area of the specific plan not proposed for changes and are in effect reinstating maps that had previously expired. Additionally, the majority bondholder and their consultants are developing several additional entitlement applications including a general plan amendment, zone change, revised specific plan, design guidelines and environmental studies. Once these additional entitlement applications are finalized, the successful negotiation of any new or modified terms of the Development Agreement can be completed. BUDGETARY IMPACT: The extension of time to October 17, 2002 will have no impact on the fiscal year 2001-02 budget. Appropriate fees will be deposited to cover Staff time prior to any subsequent amendment of the Development Agreement or negotiation of a subsequent Development Agreement. JUSTIFICATION: The extension of the Development Agreement is related to the resolution of CFD No. 2, which is listed as a high priority in the Implementation Plan as approved by the City Council on September 22, 2000. Furthermore, Section 7.1 of the Development Agreement provides that the City can either terminate or modify the Agreement in the event of a default by the other party. Inasmuch as the special taxes are delinquent, the other party to the Agreement is in default. Therefore, the City can modify the Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1. On September 18, 2001, the Council approved a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the majority bondholder within CFD 2 with the express intent to cure the delinquent taxes. A term of the MOU provided that the City would negotiate in good faith to modify the terms of the Development Agreement. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING THAT CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 19, 1989 BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO AND PR EQUITIES, LTD. WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto (the "City") and PR Equities ("Developer") have entered into that certain Development Agreement dated September 19, 1989 and effective as of October 19, 1989 (the "Development Agreement"), attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein; and WHEREAS, the Development Agreement would have expired by its own terms on October 19, 2001; and WHEREAS, the City Council by Resolution No. 2325, approved the second one hundred and twenty (120) day extension of time on January 17, 2002; and WHEREAS, Section 7.1 of the Development Agreement provides that the City may modify the Development Agreement for any failure of the Developer to perform any material duty or obligation of the Developer under the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City has evidence that the Developer may have failed to perform one or more material duties or obligations of the Developer under the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City desires to modify the Development Agreement by extending the term of the Development Agreement for a third time by one hundred and twenty (120) days from the date of the second Extension of Time Date of June 19, 2002 in order to determine the full nature and extent of the Developer's failure to perform one or more of the material duties or obligations under the Development Agreement and to deal with such failures as the City later determines to be appropriate; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Page 1 of 37 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The Development Agreement dated September 19, 1989 by and between the City of San Jacinto and PR Equities, Ltd. (the "Development Agreement") is hereby modified pursuant to section 7.1 of the Development Agreement by extending the expiration date of the Development Agreement to October 17, 2002, which is one hundred and twenty (120) days following June 19, 2002. Except as expressly modified hereby all other terms, conditions and obligations of the Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 2: This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption by the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 6th day of June, 2002 by a vote. Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Absent: ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk Page 2 of 37 City of San Jacinto by James M. Conner, Mayor EXHIBIT "A" DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT UD CI RECORDING REQUESTED BY crAND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City of San Jacinto City Clerk's Office 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 e7 CC 0 W0 CC CC O Op py 3f C.)a W CC OQ i -qq 66 1-4 .S AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (California Government Code Sections 65864-65869.5) This Amendment to Development Agreement is entered into this 1st day of September 1992, by and between PR EQUITIES, LTD., a California Limited Partnership ("Owner"), and the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, a Municipal Corporation ("City"). It is the purpose of this Agreement to amend that certain DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT made between the parties hereto, dated September 19, 1989, and recorded as Instrument No. 419784 on November 30, 1989, Records of Riverside County, California. WHEREAS, on City of San Jacinto Development Agreement was recorded November Riverside County, and RECITALS September 19, 1989, the City Council of the adopted Ordinance No. 873, approving the between the parties hereto, which agreement 30, 1989 as Instrument No. 419784, Records of WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Development Agreement to provide for certain minimum floor and minimum average floor areas per dwelling within the remaining 220 acres of Phase II of the Rancho San Jacinto Specific Plan, and WHEREAS, on August 12, 1992, CITY'S Planning Commission, after proper notice held a public hearing on this Agreement to Amend the Development Agreement. The City Council, after providing public notice as required by law, similarly held a public hearing on September 2, 1992, and 344296 WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph 4.5 of the Development Agreement, changes and amendments may be made to Development Approvals when the same are found to be appropriate and mutually desirable. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. This Agreement shall effect the property described as Tentative Tracts Nos. 24050, 24051, 24052, 24053, 24054, 24055, 24056, 24057, 26426 and 26427, all contained within the Rancho San Jacinto Specific Plan as described in the attached Exhibit "A", hereto, excluding therefrom the area north of Commonwealth and Esplanade Avenues, City of San Jacinto, California. 2. The Development Agreement dated September 19, 1989 and recorded November 30, 1989 as Instrument No. 419784 shall be and is hereby amended by adding thereto at Exhibit "A" entitled "Existing Developmental Approvals", the addendums attached hereto and entitled as follows: Addendum 1992-1 to Exhibit "A" Addendum 1992-2 to Exhibit "A" This Agreement has been executed by the parties at San Jacinto, California, on the day and year first above written. CITY OF SAN JACINTO, a Municipal corporation By FRANCIS R. BOYKIrN, MAYOR P.R. EQUITIES, LTD., a California Limited Partnership By: The Peacock-Radaker Corporation, a California corporation, General Partner By: Da id L. Cottington l� Vice President -2- 344296 State of California County of Riverside On 31 199D- before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared FRANCIS R. BOYKIN, personally known to me, _ -r^..o,a to TMiithg bae to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. na e Notary Public State of California +uwweKpt�.!lR1WM.SN�MfMMM�MMw� OFFICIAL SEAL e, ,► LAURA A. MORA 6 Notary Public - California RIVERSIDE COUNTY MMy Commission Expires Sept. 24, 19941 (SEAL) County of Riverside on Atttlu5t 'L.), Vi'i2- , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared STEVEN R. PEACOCK, President and DAVID L. COTTINGTON, Vice President, personally known to me a --proved t m a ee the sis of sati3fae-to evido-cc to be the persons who executed the within instrument as the President and Vice President, on behalf of Peacock-Radaker Corp., the corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that said corporation executed the within instrument pursuant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors, said corporation being known to me to be one of the partners of PR EQUITIES, LTD, the partnership that executed the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same as such partner and that such partnership executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. r Signature Notary, ublic -3- usiv OFFICIAL SEAL DEBR'A 1. WOLGEMUTH NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE 'COUNTY My comm. exrlrs NO 16, 1993 (SEAL) COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 SAN JACINTO VALLEY DEVELOPMENT LEGAL DESCRIPTION 344296 A portion of the H.T. Hewitt's Addition to San Jacinto as shown by Map on file in Book 13 of Maps, Page 624, Records of San Diego County, California, a portion of the resubdivision of the H.T. Hewitt's Addition to San Jacinto as shown by Map on file in Book 2 of Maps, Page 43, Records of Riverside County, California, a portion of the Kumler Ranch Tract Addition as shown by Map on file in Book 8 of Maps, Page 52, Records of Riverside County, California, and a portion of Lands of the Hemet Land Company as shown by Map on file in Book 1 of Maps, Pages 14 and 15, Records of Riverside County, California, lying within Sections 35 and 36, Township 4 South, Range 1 West, Sections 1 and 2, Township 5 South, Range 1 west and Sections 6, Township 5 South, Range 1 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the centerline intersection of Hewitt Street and Evans Street (formerly known as Third Street), as said intersection is shown off Record of Survey on file in Book 60 of Records of Survey, Page 23, said Riverside County Records; Thence South 89'45'46" East along said centerline of Evans Street a distance of 4805.36 feet to an intersection with the centerline of Old Mountain Avenue); Thence South 44'52'47" East along said centerline of Old Mountain Avenue a distance of 839.98 feet to an intersection with the Northerly prolongation of the west line of that certain parcel of land described in Deed recorded October 7, 1959, as Instrument No. 85936, Official Records of said Riverside County; Thence South 00'06'05" East along said prolongation and West line, and its Southerly prolongation, a distance of 477.53 feet to an intersection with the centerline of Tanner Street (formerly known as Sixth Street); Thence North 89'53'12" East along said centerline of Tanner Street, a distance of 473.75 feet to an intersection with the centerline of the aforementioned Mountain Avenue; Thence South 44'53'09" East along said centerline of Mountain Avenue, a distance of 1537.16 feet to an intersection with the centerline of Commonwealth Avenue; Thence South 44'52'20" East along said centerline of Moun- tain Avenue a distance of 1066.58 feet to an intersection with the Easterly prolongation of the Southerly line of Lot 2, Block 93, of Lands of the Hemet Land Company as shown by Map on file in Book 1 of Maps, Pages 14 and 15, said Riverside County Records; Exhibit A page 1 34429E COMMUNITY FACILITIES DIST. NO. 2 - LEGAL DESCRIPTION (cont.) Thence North 89'18'03" West along said prolongation and Southerly line a distance of 786.58 feet to an intersection with the centerline of Meridian Street; Thence South 00'15'14" West along said centerline of Meridian Street a distance of 746.22 feet to the intersection with the centerline of Washington Avenue; Thence South 89'52'21" West along said centerline of Washington Avenue a distance of 6217.59 feet to an intersection with the centerline of Vienna Street as vacated by Resolution of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors recorded January 29, 1921, in Book 542 of Deeds, Page 28, Records of said Riverside County, California; Thence North 00'08'40" West along said centerline of Vienna Street (vacated) a distance of 1495.07 feet to an intersection with the centerline of said Commonwealth Avenue; Thence South 89'53'49" West along said centerline of Common- wealth Avenue a distance of 673.34 feet to an intersection with the centerline of said Hewitt Street; Thence North 00'39'47" West along said centerline of Hewitt Street a distance of 2193.40 feet to the point of beginning. CONTAINING A CALCULATED AREA OF 511.009 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Excepting therefrom the Easterly 100.00 feet of the Westerly 134.26 feet of the Southerly 100.00 feet of Lot 30 of said H.T. Hewitt's Addition to San Jacinto. Also excepting therefrom the South 350.00 feet of the West 30.00 feet of Lot A designated as Kumler Street, the South 380.00 feet of Lot 4, and Lot 6, all being as shown on said Kumler Ranch Tract Addition. Also excepting therefrom that portion of said Lot 2, Block 93, Lands of Hemet Land Company, described in the Deed to Riverside County Flood Control and Conservation District recorded December 30, 1986, as Instrument No. 333509, Official Records of said Riverside County, California. CONTAINING A CALCULATED NET AREA OF 503.658 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Exibit A na.ge 2 ORDINANCE NO. 344296 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO AMENDING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 1-89 MADE BETWEEN THE CITY AND PR EQUITIES, LTD, DATED SEPTEMBER 19, 1989, AND RECORDED ON NOVEMBER 30, 1989 AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" WHEREAS, on September 19, 1989, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 873, approving Development Agreement 1-89, affecting real property known as the Rancho San Jacinto Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the parties of the agreement now desire to amend Development Agreement 1-89 to provide for certain minimum floor and average minimum floor areas per dwellings within the remaining 220 acres of Phase II of the Rancho San Jacinto Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, on August 12, 1992, the Planning Commission, after proper notice held a public hearing on the request to amend Development Agreement 1-89. The City Council, after providing public notice as prescribed by law, similarly held a public hearing on September 1, 1992; and WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 4.5 of Development Agreement 1-89, changes and amendments may be made to the Development Agreement when said changes are found to be appropriate and mutually desirable. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Sections 65864 - 65869.5 of the Government Code of the State of California permits the City to enter into a Development Agreement with a property owner. SECTION 2. Ordinance No. 831 of the City established the rules and procedures for the consideration of Development Agreements. SECTION 3. The City Council does hereby approve the amendment to Development Agreement 1-89 attached hereto and incorporated as a part hereof as Exhibit "A". 344291 SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the day of , 1992. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1992 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST Mayor Deputy City Clerk CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of , 1992. City Clerk 3442S ADDENDUM 1992-1 TO EXHIBIT "A" "EXISTING DEVELOPMENTAL APPROVALS" RANCHO SAN JACINTO PHASE II DEVELOPMENT PLAN TRACT # LOT SIZE TOTAL LOTS % OF TOTAL 24050 5000 83 Min. 1231 S.F. 24051 5000 64 Avg. 1400 S.F. 24052 6000 117 SUBTOTAL 264 33% 24053 24054 24055 26426 24056 24057 26427 7200 84 6000 124 7200 47 7200 73 SUBTOTAL 328 7200 103 7200 92 7200 92 SUBTOTAL 287 GRAND TOTAL 879 Min. 1360 S.F. Avg. 1600 S.F. 37% Min. 1500 S.F. Avg. 1750 S.F. 33% 34429( Tentative Minimum Average Tentative Minimum Average Tentative Minimum Average ADDENDUM 1992-2 TO EXHIBIT "A" "EXISTING DEVELOPMENTAL APPROVALS" PHASE II RANCHO SAN JACINTO DEVELOPMENT PLAN tract maps #24050, 24051, 24052 dwelling size 1,231 sq. ft. size dwelling size 1,400 sq. ft. tract maps #24053, 24054, 24055, 26426 dwelling size 1,360 sq. ft. size dwelling size 1,600 sq. ft. tract maps #24056, 24057, 26427 dwelling size 1,500 sq. size dwelling size 1,750 sq. ft. ft. NOTE: The Ultimate average dwelling unit size should be no less than 95% of the model average for the related tract to allow for changes in the mix brought on by market pressures. Tentative Minimum Average Tentative Minimum Average Tentative Minimum Average Note: ADDENDUM 1992-2 TO EXHIBIT "A" "EXISTING DEVELOPMENTAL APPROVALS" PHASE II RANCHO SAN JACINTO DEVELOPMENT PLAN tract maps #24050, 24051, 24052 dwelling size 1,231 sq. ft. size dwelling size 1,400 sq. ft. tract maps #24053, 24054, 24055, 26426 dwelling size 1,360 sq. ft. size dwelling size 1,600 sq. ft. tract maps #24056, 24057, 26427 dwelling size 1,500 sq. ft. size dwelling size 1,750 sq. ft. The average dwelling unit size should be allowed to vary at least 5% to allow for changes in the mix brought on by market pressures. 34429f RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY OF SAN JACINTO City Clerk's Office 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, California 92383 Attn: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (California Government Code Sections 65864-65869.5) This Development Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into effective on September 19. , 1989, by and between PR EQUITIES, LTD., a California limited partnership ("OWNER"), and the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, a municipal corpora- tion ("CITY"). RECITALS A. When used in these recitals, each of the terms defined in Article 1 of this Agreement shall have the meaning given to it therein. S. California Government Code sections 65864 through 65869.5 authorize CITY to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property, in order to, among other things: encourage and provide for the development of public facilities in order to support the development of new housing; provide certainty in the approval of development projects in order to avoid the waste of resources and the escalation of the cost of housing and other development to the consumer and encourage investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning which will make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public; and provide assurance to developers (1) that they may proceed with their projects in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, subject to their conditions of approval and (2) in order to strengthen the public planning process and encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the economic costs of development. C. OWNER is the holder of a legal or equitable interest in that certain Property (hereinafter defined) and desires and intends to develop the Property as a large-scale, mixed use development for the uses and purposes set forth in the Specific Plan (as defined below). The development of the Property requires substantial early and major capital expen- ditures and investments with respect to the construction and installation of major infrastructure facilities, both on -site and off -site, of sufficient capacity to serve the residents and others using the Property as anticipated by the Specific Plan and this Agreement. D. On July 19, 1988, the development of the Property was authorized by Resolution No. 1772 of the City Council of CITY approving the Specific Plan. E. On August 16, 1988, CITY adopted Ordinance No. 846 amending zoning map of CITY establishing planned community development zoning overlaying the Specific Plan. F. OWNER intends to proceed with the development of the Property as soon as is feasible. G. OWNER and CITY intend to enter into this Agreement relating to the development of the Property to provide some certainty in the land use regulations and policies applicable to the Property, to provide for the orderly development of the Property, to ensure progressive installation of necessary improvements, provide for public services appropriate for the development of the Property, and generally serve the purposes for which development agreements under sections 65864, et seq., of the California Government Code are intended. H. On January 3 , 1989, pursuant to California Government Code, Sections 53311 et seq. ("Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982") Community Facilities District No. 2 _("CFD") was formed by City Resolutions Nos. 1795, 1796, 1797 and 1798. The CFD was formed pursuant to a petition, executed by OWNER, requesting the district to be formed to provide a financing mechanism to pay for the construction of certain Public Improvements (as hereinafter defined) that would benefit the Property. OWNER advanced those monies needed to pay all costs associated with forming the CFD and retained and paid civil engineers to design and engineer the public facilities to be constructed. Said public facilities were designed to benefit the Property and certain of the facilities are over -sized to benefit adjacent properties and the public at large. OWNER consented to the formation of the CFD. 2 I. OWNER has incurred and will in the future incur substantial costs in order to ensure development of the Property in accordance with this Agreement. J. On 08-16-89 , 1989, CITY's Planning Commission, after giving notice pursuant to California Government Code sections 65854, 65854.5 and 65856, held a public hearing on this Agreement. Council of CITY, after providing public notice as required by law, similarly held a public hearing on 09-05-89 , 1989. K. CITY has found that this Agreement is consistent with the Specific Plan, as well as all other applicable policies and regulations of CITY, and that completion of the Development (as hereinafter defined) is consistent with the Specific Plan and all specific plans within the CITY and will provide balanced land uses and economically sound communities so as to maintain the overall quality of life and environment within the CITY. L. On 03-19-89 , 1989, the City Council of CITY adopted Ordinance No. R71 approving this Agreement; the Ordinance took effect on 10-19-89 1989 ("Effective Date"). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above -recited facts and of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained and for other good and valuable consideration, receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS 1.1 "Agreement" means this Development Agreement. 1.2 "Assumption Agreement" shall have the meaning ascribed to it in Section 2.4.2. 1.3 "CITY" means the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of California, a municipal corporation. 1.4 "City Council" shall mean the City Council of CITY as duly composed from time to time. 1.5 "CFD" shall have the meaning ascribed to it in Paragraph H of the Recitals. 1.6 "Development" means the improvement of the Property for the purposes of completing structures, improve- ments and facilities thereon, and the construction of infra- structure and other Public Facilities related thereto whether located within or outside the Property. "Development" does not include the maintenance, repair, reconstruction or redevelopment of any building, structure, improvement or facility after the construction, completion and acceptance thereof. 1.7 "Development Approvals" means site specific plans, maps, permits and other entitlements to use, of every kind and nature, approved or granted by CITY in connection with the Development, including, without limitation, feature plans, area plans, site plans, tentative and final subdivi- sion tract maps, conditions of approval, parcel maps, vesting tentative maps, conditional and special use permits, grading, building and other similar permits, and zoning. 1.8 "Development Fee" means 1.8.1 Requirements of CITY in connection with or pursuant to any Land Use Regulation or Development Approval for the payment of fees or money or the construction or improvement of Public Facilities in order to lessen, offset, mitigate or compensate for the adverse impacts of the Project on the environment or other public concerns or interests; 1.8.2 Assessments and levies by CITY for the improvement, construction or acquisition of any public infrastructure, facilities or property imposed as a condition of the Development, other than general real property, sales and ad valorem taxes; or 1.8.3 Building Permit Fees. 1.9 "Development Plan" means all ordinances, resolu- tions, codes, rules, regulations, general plan and official policies of CITY in effect on the Effective Date of this Agreement relating to growth management and environmental considerations of CITY and/or which govern the permitted uses and development of the Property, and/or the density, design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to the Development and/or to the Property, and all permits or approvals issued or granted by CITY in connection with any of the foregoing. The Development Plan includes, without limitation, the Specific Plan and approved sub- division tract maps relating to the Project. 1.10 "Effective Date" shall have the meaning ascribed to it in Paragraph L of the Recitals. 4 1.11 "Existing Development Approvals" means those certain Development Approvals in effect on the Effective Date with respect to the Property and/or the Development, includ- ing without limitation, the Existing Development Approvals which are listed on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incor- porated herein by this reference. 1.12 "Existing Land Use Regulations" means those certain Land Use Regulations in effect on the Effective Date, including without limitation, City Ordinance 340, the General Plan as amended by City Resolution No. 1772 and the approved conceptual and comprehensive Development Plan. 1.13 "Land Use Regulations" means all ordinances, resolutions, codes, rules, regulations and official policies of CITY governing the development and use of land, including without limitation, growth management and environmental considerations, the permitted use of land, the density or intensity of use, subdivision requirements, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings, the provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes and all design, improvement and construction standards and specifi- cations applicable to the Development and/or to the Property. 1.14 "Mortgage" means a mortgage, deed of trust, sale and leaseback arrangement or other transaction in which the Property or a portion thereof or an interest therein is pledged as security, contracted for in good faith and for fair value. 1.15 "Mortgagee" means the holder of the beneficial interest under a Mortgage or the owner of the Property or interest therein under a Mortgage. 1.16 "OWNER" means the person or legal entity having a legal or equitable interest in the Property and includes PR EQUITIES, LTD., a California limited partnership, and its successors in interest. 1.17 "Property" means that certain real property, consisting of approximately four hundred seventy-one (471) acres, located north of Park Hill, southwest of the San Jacinto River and southeast of the center of the City of San Jacinto, Riverside County, California, as more particu- larly described and shown on Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 1.18 "Public Facilities" shall have the meaning ascribed to it in Section 3.1 herein. 1.19 "Reservations of Authority" means the rights and authority excepted from the assurances and rights provided to OWNER under this Agreement and reserved to CITY in Section 4.6. 1.20 "Specific Plan" shall mean, collectively, the San Jacinto Valley I Specific Plan and the San Jacinto Valley II Specific Plan, also known as Specific Plans 1-88 and 2-88, as approved by CITY Resolution No. 1772, adopted on July 19, 1988. A copy of said Resolution No. 1772 is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by this reference. 1.21 "Subsequent Development Approvals" means all Development Approvals required subsequent to the Effective Date in connection with the Development. 1.22 "Subsequent Land Use Regulations" means any Land Use Regulations which may be adopted and/or become effective after the Effective Date. ARTICLE 2 GENERAL PROVISIONS 2.1 Interest of OWNER. OWNER represents and warrants to CITY that, as of the Effective Date, OWNER is the record fee title holder of the Property and that all other persons holding a legal or equitable interest in the Property, if any, shall be bound by this Agreement. 2.2 Binding Effect of Agreement. The Property is hereby made subject to this Agreement and the Development is hereby authorized and shall be carried out only in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 2.3 Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Late and, unless earlier terminated pursuant to the express provisions hereof, shall continue for a period of twelve (12) years thereafter unless this term is modified or extended pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2.4 Assignment. OWNER shall have the right to sell, assign or transfer the Property in whole or in part, to any person, partnership, joint venture, firm or corporation at any time during the term of this Agreement, provided that any such sale, assignment or transfer shall include the pro rata assignment and assumption of those rights, duties and obliga- tions arising under or from this Agreement applicable to the Property or portions thereof being sold, assigned or trans- ferred and shall be made in strict compliance with the following conditions precedent: 6 2.4.1 No sale, transfer or assignment of any right or interest under this Agreement shall be made unless made together with the sale, transfer or assignment of all or a part of the Property. 2.4.2 Within thirty (30) days after any such sale, transfer or assignment, OWNER shall notify CITY, in writing, of such sale, transfer or assignment and shall provide CITY with an executed assumption agreement ("Assump- tion Agreement"), in a form reasonably acceptable to CITY, by the purchaser, transferee or assignee in which such pur- chaser, transferee or assignee expressly and unconditionally assumes all of the duties and obligations of OWNER under this Agreement. 2.4.3 Any sale, transfer or assignment not made in strict compliance with the foregoing conditions shall constitute a default by OWNER under this Agreement. Notwith- standing the failure of any purchaser, transferee or assignee to execute the Assumption Agreement required above, the burdens of this Agreement shall be binding upon such pur- chaser, transferee or assignee but the benefits of this Agreement shall not inure to such purchaser, transferee or assignee until and unless such Assumption Agreement is executed. 2.5 Release of Transferring OWNER. The execution of an Assumption Agreement by an assignee, transferee or pur- chaser shall, without any act of or concurrency by CITY, relieve OWNER of its legal duty to perform said obligations under this Agreement. CITY shall not impose any conditions on or otherwise have any rights of approval over any such sale, assignment or transfer. Any and all successors and assigns of OWNER shall have all of the same rights, benefits and obligations of OWNER under this Agreement. It is_understood and agreed by the parties that the Property may be further subdivided after the Effective Date of this Agreement. One or more of such subdivided parcels may be sold, assigned or transferred to persons or entities for development by them in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. Effective upon such sale, assignment or transfer, the obligations of OWNER and the persons or entities to whom such parcels are sold, assigned or transferred shall become several and not joint. Noncom- pliance by any such persons or entities with the terms and conditions of this Agreement or with applicable CITY rules and regulations shall be deemed a default by such noncomply- ing person or entity with respect to the portion of the Property owned by such noncomplying person or entity, but shall not be deemed to be a default by OWNER hereunder or 7 grounds for termination hereof, or constitute cause for CITY to initiate enforcement action against other persons or entities then owning or holding interest in the Property or any portion thereof and not themselves in default here- under. Upon completion of any phase or tract of the Development as determined by CITY, CITY may release that completed phase or tract from any further obligations under this Agreement. 2.6 Termination of Agreement with Respect to Individ- ual Lots upon Sale to Public and Completion of Construc- tion. The provisions of Section 2.4 shall not apply to the sale, or lease for a period longer than one (1) year, of any lot which has been finally subdivided and is individually (and not in bulk) sold or leased to a member of the public or other ultimate user. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, this Agreement shall terminate with respect to any lot and such lot shall be released and no longer subject to this Agreement without the execution or recordation of any further document, upon satisfaction of both of the following conditions: 2.6.1 The lot has been finally subdivided and individually (and not in bulk) sold, or leased for a period longer than one (1) year, to a member of the public or other ultimate user, subject to the CFD. 2.6.2 A certificate of occupancy has been issued for a building on the lot. ARTICLE 3 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 3.1 Public Improvements, Facilities and Services. Pursuant to the conditions of approval for the Specific Plan, OWNER will pay for or arrange to pay for its fair share of the financing of the on -site and off -site public improvements facilities and services ("Public Facilities"), as described in Exhibit "D" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. OWNER intends to finance all or a portion of the Public Facilities through the CFD. 3.2 Phasing. OWNER shall phase construction of the Public Facilities in the manner and in accordance with the time frames and conditions set forth in the Development Plan. OWNER reserves the right to accelerate construction of the private portion of the Project so long as construction of the Public Facilities associated therewith meets, or is also accelerated to meet, the community public infrastructure needs relating to the Development in a manner permitted by Estudillo Mansion 1885 The City of San Jacinto presents this Certificate of Achievement to Marianne Warneke , San Jacinto High School Graduate In recognition of your excellence in academics throughoutyour High Schoolyears, and foryourparticipation in the Charlotte Mousel Essay Contest. Your essay reflects the feelings of all Americans who are committed to their country; this patriotism is what makes the U.S.A. such a great nation. City of San Jacinto im Ayres, Vice -Mayor June 19, 2002 J SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON do EDISOA IVTLR, ITION 1/. - Company June 6, 2002 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 RE: Agenda Item 3.1 Zoning Ordinance Amendment No 1102-02-08 My name is Mary Drury, Public Affairs Project Manager for Southern California Edison (SCE). Because of Bob Lopez, who is usually the SCE representative to the City of San Jacinto, being out of town, I have been asked to address the Council regarding this agenda item. SCE has contractual arrangements with several wireless companies in allowing them to attach their equipment to SCE poles, towers and other accessible equipment (where it is compatible) once the wireless company has obtained the necessary permits and/or licenses from the public agency within the area where the wireless equipment will be located. As such, Section 23.76, 2(b) - height restriction - at 15 feet does not allow a wireless company to make use of already existing equipment that exceeds this height such as the SCE poles and towers. The wireless companies are frequently requesting 30 to 50 foot high locations. We respectfully suggest the City Council may want to make this change so that, where equipment of this height already exists, the wireless equipment can be attached without creating greater visual impact. For Section 23.76, 2(c) adding the definition of a "structure" may provide clarity for staff and the wireless companies in that there will be a general idea of what the city has contemplated as acceptable locations for such wireless attachments. Other cities 36100 Cathedral Canyon Dr. Cathedral City, CA 92234 J SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON An EDISO\ IVTF.RA'. ITION•II.' Company June 6, 2002 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 RE: Agenda Item 3.1 Zoning Ordinance Amendment No 1102-02-08 My name is Mary Drury, Public Affairs Project Manager for Southern California Edison (SCE). Because of Bob Lopez, who is usually the SCE representative to the City of San Jacinto, being out of town, I have been asked to address the Council regarding this agenda item. SCE has contractual arrangements with several wireless companies in allowing them to attach their equipment to SCE poles, towers and other accessible equipment (where it is compatible) once the wireless company has obtained the necessary permits and/or licenses from the public agency within the area where the wireless equipment will be located. As such, Section 23.76, 2(b) - height restriction - at 15 feet does not allow a wireless company to make use of already existing equipment that exceeds this height such as the SCE poles and towers. The wireless companies are frequently requesting 30 to 50 foot high locations. We respectfully suggest the City Council may want to make this change so that, where equipment of this height already exists, the wireless equipment can be attached without creating greater visual impact. For Section 23.76, 2(c) adding the definition of a "structure" may provide clarity for staff and the wireless companies in that there will be a general idea of what the city has contemplated as acceptable locations for such wireless attachments. Other cities 36100 Cathedral Canyon Dr. Cathedral City, CA 92234 MEMORANDUM TO: Jake Wager, City Manager FROM: Jim Barron, Battalion Chief DATE: June 6, 2002 SUBJECT: Fire Department Reply to Staffing / Equipment Question During the Fire Department's presentation at the City Budget Workshop on Thursday, May 30, 2002, Mayor Conner inquired about the status of City -owned fire equipment that was in existence at the time the City began contracting with the CDF/County Fire Department. At the time when the first contract was struck in 1996, the City owned two (2) 1989 "Spartan" fire engines, one (1) brush engine and one (1) squad. In or around June, 1999, one of the fire engines was totaled in an accident. This unit was replaced by the new Engine-25 recently placed into service. The City Council will recall that the City's original squad has most recently been replaced due to its age. Also, the "brush engine," with the City's approval, was donated to the Little Lake Volunteer Fire Company. For clarification, the City contracted for the necessary staffing to provide a minimum of three firefighters on -duty per day. CDF has maintained that level of service to the City since the inception of our contract. Previous to contracting, the City staffed both an engine (3-person) and a squad (2-person). Apparently, the early thinking was that City would be able to maintain the necessary depth in coverage via the State fire engine assigned at Station 25, as well as through the surrounding County fire stations that back up the City. I would be more than happy to research any further questions that you or Council may have. MEMORANDUM June 7, 2002 TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: Jake Wager, City Manager SUBJECT: BUDGET — FY 2002-03 On Thursday, May 30, 2002, several clarifications were requested regarding the FY 2002-03 budget proposal. Responses from Public Works, Community Development, and Finance are attached. A question was asked regarding the estimated cost of constructing a block wall at Skyview Park. Based on a review of an estimate received for this project, and a review of the cost for a similar project recently completed, staff believes that $55,000 should be sufficient to complete this project. Memorandum Date: June 6, 2002 To: Jake Wager, City Manager From: Bob Lavin, Public Works Superintendent Re: City Parks Monthly Duties The City of San Jacinto has six (6) parks located in various areas of the city. These areas are included as a segment of the city Lighting Landscape and Maintenance District (LLMD). Grounds maintenance for these areas is the responsibility of the landscape contractor, including but not limited to, turf mowing and edging, shrub pruning, tree trimming, weed control, rodent/pest control, trash and debris removal, restroom cleanup and rinsing, restroom lockup (Rancho, Mistletoe, Salle), parking lot lockup (Rancho), and other related duties. Parks Division staff Ray Sanchez, Supervisor and Paul Hernandez, Maint I are responsible for all irrigation related duties and all extras as needed and required. Park names and related duties required of staff are as follows: 1. Druding Park (Ramona BI x Pico St) — Irrigation scheduling; timer and sprinkler repairs/adjustments; trees, shrubs and flowers planted/replaced as needed; tables, benches, fountains and signage installed, repaired or replaced as needed (vandalism); Veteran's Memorial (Tank) painted, repaired and/or prepared as needed for special occasions. The area of Druding Park covers 2/3`d acre. 2. Hofmann Park/Community Center (Pico St x Sixth St) — Irrigation scheduling; timer and sprinkler repairs/adjustments; trees, shrubs and flowers planted/replaced as needed; tables, benches, fountains and signage installed, repaired or replaced as needed; picnic structure (Gazebo) painted, repaired and/or prepared as needed for special occasions. The area of Hoffman Park/Community Center covers 1 ''A acres. PUBLIC WORKS 3. Mistletoe Park (Main St x Mistletoe Ave) — Irrigation scheduling; timer and sprinkler repairs/adjustments; plant materials installed/replaced as needed; tables, benches, fountains and signage repaired/replaced as needed; play equipment installed, repaired or replaced as needed; restroom facilities as needed including tissue/towels, fixtures/lighting, and graffiti abatement; picnic structure repairs and cleanup. The area of Mistletoe Park covers 2 acres. 4. Rancho Park (Esplanade Ave x Arroyo Viejo St) — Irrigation scheduling; timer and sprinkler repairs/adjustments; plant materials replaced as needed; tables, benches, fountains and signage repaired/replaced; play equipment repaired/replaced; restroom facilities checked, repairs and cleanup; tennis court and basketball court repairs (nets) and cleanup (wash downs); picnic structure(s) repairs and cleanup; lighting repairs as needed. The area of Rancho Park covers 5 `V2 acres. 5. Sallee Park (Idyllwild Dr x Tahquitz Ave) — Irrigation scheduling; timer and sprinkler repairs/adjustments; tree rimming and cleanup; tables, benches, fountains and signage repaired/replaced; play equipment repaired/replaced; restroom facilities checked and repaired as needed. The area of Sallee Park covers 5 acres. 6. Skyview Park/Tot-Lot (Skyview Ave x Ramona Bl) — Irrigation scheduling; timer and sprinkler repairs/adjustments; tree replacement; tables, benches, fountains and signage repaired/replaced; play equipment repaired/replaced; picnic structure repairs and cleanup (Graffiti); fence repairs (vandalism). The area of Skyview Park/Tot-Lot covers 1/3 acre. PUBLIC WORKS To: From: Date: Subject: Sallee Park Memorandum Jake Wager, City Manager / Tim Hults, Planning Director 1A June 6, 2002 Budget Presentation Follow-up I have worked with Sam Geopp from Valley Wide on the Phase I renovations to Sallee Park. The environmental document has been finalized and forwarded to the County Clerk for posting. Sam Geopp has completed the bid documents and submitted a request to the State for Proposition 12 funds in order to leverage the CDBG funds (approx. $95,000) allocated to the project. The initial phase of development will include the removal of several unsafe and inappropriate trees, installation of a new irrigation system at the park only, and the hydro seeding of the park. In addition, the renovation of the ballpark, the installation of new ballpark lighting, the renovation of the restroom building, the parking lot and the basketball court are also Phase I improvements. With regard to the overall Sallee Park/Monte Vista Master Plan, the School District is exploring how Monte Vista will be used in the upcoming years. The School District is analyzing a number of options for all their campuses as their enrollment continues to increase. Once the student population at the school is determined (i.e. elementary or middle school), the District will then finalize the type of playground or recreation facilities needed at the campus. When a decision is made on the campus population, the District staff, Valley -Wide staff and I will begin meeting to develop a master plan for the Sallee Park/Monte Vista area. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Budget Follow-up Page 2 Until the master plan is fully developed and approved by the City Council, School District Board and Valley -Wide Board, it is difficult to budget for any improvements. Additionally, a participation agreement amongst all three agencies will be needed. The participation agreement would also determine the level of financial participation by each agency. Once the agreement is developed and approved, I would recommend that Park Development Funds be used toward the City's funding participation. These funds could be allocated through the budget amendment process or at the mid -year budget review. HOME Program Funds The HOME Program is a federal funding source developed by HUD to improve the supply of affordable housing. Because San Jacinto is not an entitlement City (over 50,000 in population), the City entered into a three-year cooperation agreement with County of Riverside Economic Development Agency (EDA) for CDBG program funds. The terms of the cooperation agreement provide that the City may only pursue HOME funds directly from the County. As such, Staff will coordinate with County EDA Staff to submit the appropriate application for HOME Program funds. If the City were successful in obtaining HOME Program funds, the HOME Program funds would be leveraged with Redevelopment Housing funds toward the implementation of one of the proposed housing projects included in the proposed budget. A budget amendment would be necessary to include any HOME Program funds awarded to the City into the budget. MEMORANDUM June 6, 2002 To: Jake Wager, City Manager From: Bernie Simon, Finance Director Subj: FY 2002-2003 Budget Review Responses to Budget Hearing Questions from May 30, 2002 1. Change in Contracts, Leases and Rents —Public Works Streets -Summary Budget Page 89- Summary line item for Contracts, Leases and Rents - $92,000 for current FY, $ 56,083 as an actual number for FYE 6/30/01 and $55,000 for proposed FY 2002-03. Proposed FY 2002-03 budget is for $5,000 for weed spraying services and $50,000 for traffic signal maintenance for a Total of $55,000. The current FY budget is $92,000, and includes tree trimming, other street services, $28,000 for traffic signal maintenance, and another $28,000 budget adjustment for a prior year catch-up traffic maintenance bill from Riverside County. Tree trimming was moved from this line item and placed in Capital Projects - Tree Trimming projects in Fund 32 — Parkway Development and is estimated at $110,000 under line item 032-7150-410-4001. 2. Community Development Budget Summary Questions were noted about Insurance and Bonds of $135,270 for Proposed FY 2002-03 and that it increased from $56,035 as budgeted in the current FY. Our projected overall Liability insurance costs including self retention, claim costs, claims programs, defense costs and proactive insurance services are anticipated to cost an additional 41% with most of the costs resulting from anticipated higher reinsurance costs through our risk management pool (PERMA). The overall liability insurance costs are then allocated to all funds on a prorata direct cost basis. In this particular budget summary, Community Development includes Planning, Building, CDBG, RDA and LM RDA Housing and excludes any Capital Projects separately stated in the Capital Projects Section of the budget document. Overhead allocation of $43,220 relates to Measure A projects that should actually be shown in the Capital Projects section rather than the Community Development Summary Budget. Page 64 Fund Summary of Community Development Funding section showing $56, 775 from Measure A, actually relates to Measure A capital projects and should be in the Capital Projects Section. Professional Fees Summary indicated a proposed budget of $226,445. The majority of costs consist of: $ 50,000 Continue General Plan Update — General Fund —010 $100,000 Continue General Plan/Housing- RDA Fund -099 $ 50,000 - User Fee Study General Fund -010 Page 64 Fund Summary of Community Development Funding section showing $100,578 of CDBG Projects, shows only non -capital projects. There is another $280,000 in CDBG costs showing under the "Capital Projects" Section. 3. 8% Contingency Reserve Figure of $491,290 shown on page 2 and 3 is based on the Original Approved Budget Resolution for FY 2001-2002 relating to the General Fund. The current year budget has been increased through additional budget appropriations during the year but the City has not increased this amount. There is no current policy or direction to increase this amount each year or as the general fund budget increases. To increase the contingency will decrease the available, unrestricted General Fund Balance accordingly. This amount can be set to any level deemed appropriate by the Council. To: All Personnel From: Police Administration Date: June 6, 2002 Subject: New Hire, Police Officer Effective June 6, 2002, Otis Grant will start as a Police Officer with our department. Otis has been with the department since February 15, 2001 in a Police Officer Reserve capacity. He attended Rio Hondo Police Academy and has an AA degree in Administration of Justice from San Bernardino Valley College. Otis volunteers his time to underprivileged children within the community. He feels he can make a difference by being a roll model to teens and adults by his positive disposition. Otis enjoys fishing, working out, and relaxing with his 6 year old son Brandon. POLICE DEPARTMENT 3u/viiJiil EXHIBIT B City Council Minutes January 3, 2002 Page 6of6 Council Member Ayres explained that Valley Restart has lots of other funding sources, too. His preference was to have the Subcommittee recommendations stand. M/S/C (Williams / Ayres) moved to accept recommendations by the Subcommittee for projects and programs for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds for Fiscal Year 2002 / 2003. Motion carried 3/2. Ayes: Ayres, Carlson-Buydos, Williams Nays: Conner, Good Absent: Abstain: 4. CITY DEPARTMENTS 4.1 Committee and Sub -Committee Appointments / Local Appointments List aka Maddy List Mayor Williams distributed a handout with his recommendation and asked for Council to respond. Following the discussion and comments for who the representatives should be on existing committees new committees were added and others deleted. M/S/C (Williams / Conner) moved to appoint the following on the various committees: CDBG Review: COUNCIL AD HOC SUBCOMMITTEES Mayor Williams ~ -` Council-. tuber Ayres Education: Dropped (2002) General Plan Review: Highway 79 Realignment: Refuse/Recycling: San Jacinto Levees: -Psiettry Council Member Carlson-Buydos r tje Council Member Ayres Pdimpsx Council Member Carlson-Buydos e Council Member Ayres Ago:mateice Mayor Conner (IdoS City Council Minutes January 3, 2002 Page 8 of 8 Planning Director Hults Riverside County Fire Battalion Chief Barron Riverside County Fire Battalion Chief Barron 1' Sr. Issues & Sr. Housing Dropped Committee: Tribal Council Liaison Mayor Williams nner VEDC: Primary Council Member Ayres A Alternate 1 Vice Mayor Conner Alternate 2 Council Member Good a fh /jib r<v WRCOG Primary Vice Mayor Conner Alternate Council Member Carlson-Buydos Water Issues:'Primary Vice Mayor Conner kaltmate Council Member Carlson-Buydos 4th of July Parade: Council Member Ayres Festival of Families Mayor Williams Library Advisory Primary Vice Mayor Conner Alternate San Jacinto Librarian Landscape LLMD PiOrrapy Council Member Good Attusraate Council Member Carlson-Buydos -Treasurer Potts ( ittee) Motion passed 5/0 M/S/C (Williams / Conner) motioned to amend the previous motion to include the League of California Cities with the primary representative will be Mayor Williams and the alternate Vice Mayor Conner. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Carlson-Buydos, Conner, Good, Williams Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None AGENDA REGULAR MEETING SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL June 6, 2002, 7:00 p.m. co�� .14/11,vviset) / ire San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Invocation Father Earl Henry, St. Joseph's Catholic Church 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance 1.5 Special Presentations 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Now is the time for the public to address the Council on any subject not listed on the agenda. A recap of the nonagendized comments will be addressed under item number 2.1 during the City's second regular meeting of the month. 3. PUBLIC HEARING 3.1 ktr.-' • n' � rdina mendrn -0 o - jreless Ordir a -, d . 40 / Ordinance No. 1102-02-08 / An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Adding Section 23.76, Wireless Telecommunications Facilities, to the San Jacinto Zoning OrdinapmO.rrdinange 3 0 / Ado Mitigated Negative Declaration and Woprfirst rradlnb o (5r tc r' 4 e No. 1102-02-08 and motion to read by title only: Ordinance No. 1102-02-08 / An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Adding Section 23.76, Wireless Telecommunications Facilities, to the San Jacinto Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance 340 City Council Agenda May 16, 2002 Page 2 of 3 4. CITY DEPARTMENTS 4.1 Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1 (LLPD No. 1) / Accept Engineer's Report and Declare the Intent4 to Levy and Collect Assessments within bLPD No. 1 and Give Notice of and Setiieg.the Time and Place,afthe Hearing on the Levy of the Proposed Assessment / Finance Director 4.2 Cooperative Agreement between the State of California Department of Transportation and the City of San Jacinto for the Interim Realignment of SR 79 / Approve agreement and Authorize Mayor to execute agreement / City Manager 4.3 Local Appointments List (aka Maddy List) / Ratification of Mayor Conner's Appointments / City Clerk LsNbtc / IVFOizm rr now 4.4 Amendment No. 5 to Development Agreement 1-89 / Authorize extension of time to October 17, 2002 / Planning Director 'on$ -40r 4.5 � November 5, 2002 Election 5/( 4.5.1 Resolution No. / A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Calling a General Municipal Election on November 5, 2002 / Adopt / City Clerk 4.5.2 Resolution No. / A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Adopting Regulations for Candidates for Elective Office, Pertaining to the Electorate and the Costs thereof for the General Municipal Election to be Held in the City of San Jacinto on Tuesday, November 5, 2002 / Adopt / City Clerk Resolution No. / A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Revising the Job Description for Community Development Director / Adopt / City Manager iv Ka,r,) �Pn Optical Imaging Supplies and Equipment / Review specifications for supplies and equipment and Authorize purchase / City Clerk /6191.nance No. _ / Police Chief` 4/7 2,£7J)- Eikdorj7 1.12Sok(kGov) 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by Agency Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion City Council Agenda May 16, 2002 Page 3 of 3 on these items prior to the motion unless members of the Redevelopment Agency, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Agency President; state their name, address and the consent calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. 5.1 Warrant Register for Warrants, Prepaid Checks, and Payroll Checks Period Ending 6/6/02 / Approve / Finance Director 5.2 May 16, 2002 Budget Workshop Meeting Minutes / Approve / City Clerk 5.3 May 16, 2002 Regular Meeting Minutes / Approve / City Clerk 5.4 Treasurer's Report April 30, 2002 / Receive and File /Finance Director Meeting recesses to consider the Redevelopment Agency Agenda. Regular Meeting resumes following the Redevelopment Agency Meeting. 6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS 7. CLOSED SESSION 8. ADJOURNMENT CHALLENGE TO LAND USE DECISIONS: Any person seeking to challenge a decision regarding land use made by the City Council as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and the discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the City Council, shall be required to commence that action 90 days following the date on which the decision of the City Council becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Please refer to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes final. It is the intention of the City of San Jacinto to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact City Hall at (909) 487- 7330, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. City Council Agenda May 16, 2002 Page 4 of 3 9, Do otluy 4. el+ouc:raad. 6.4 efeo4 4 de ear, °d San l9aeexta. do lune4 ce ry eat 9 eaueed to de f000red t!e 602ego61 ageorda tlua Not day o f . as aegained 4 eaw. 05-28-02 11:08am From-DEPT OF TRANS '2 +0003836230 T-357 P.02/02 F-653 .�f'tjry�UNCAtiroaNIA_FITISINEss_TBANSPORTAPIONANDJi0l7SINGAGENCY t:RAY DAVIq riovertuc DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR District 8 464W. FOURTH STREET SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401 1400 PHONE (909) 383.4033 FAX (909) 383-6239 TTY (909) 383.6000 eRr May 28, 2002 Mr_ Jake Wager City Manager City of San Jacinto P.O. Box 488 San Jacinto, CA 92581 Dear Mr. Wager: TRANSFER OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 Flex your you,erf Be energy efficie,C! This letter is intended to address the City's concerns regarding the transfer of portions of State Route 79 (Gilman Springs Road), in exchange for portions of Ramona Expressway and Sanderson Avenue. The concerns are the pavement condition and access control on portions of Ramona Expressway. The State intends to maintain Ramona Expressway in a condition as good as or better than the roadway is currently maintained. It is the District's intent to invest the funds from the Portrero Bridge project into upgrading this portion of Ramona Expressway. This fund transfer will require departmental concurrence and California Transportation Commission (CTC) approval. Approvals are dependent on statewide need, priorities and available funding. Be assured that this project is a priority for the district and that we will actively pursue the funding approval. Ramona Expressway access control requirements can be documented in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and Caltrans. I recommend that we begin discussions as quickly as possible with the goal of having the MOU executed within one year of the transfer completion. Please call me at (909) 383-4055 to arrange a meeting to discuss the MOU and if you have additional questions. ANNE E. MAYER District Director c: Supervisor James A. Venable "Caltrans improves, laolnluy across Cale/ornw- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING THAT CERTAIN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 19, 1989 BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO AND PR EQUITIES, LTD. WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto (the "City") and PR Equities ("Developer") have entered into that certain Development Agreement dated September 19, 1989 and effective as of October 19, 1989 (the "Development Agreement"), attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein; and WHEREAS, the Development Agreement would have expired by its own terms on October 19, 2001; and WHEREAS, the City Council by Resolution No. 2325, approved the second one hundred and twenty (120) day extension of time on January 17, 2002; and WHEREAS, Section 7.1 of the Development Agreement provides that the City may modify the Development Agreement for any failure of the Developer to perform any material duty or obligation of the Developer under the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City has evidence that the Developer may have failed to perform one or more material duties or obligations of the Developer under the Development Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City desires to modify the Development Agreement by extending the term of the Development Agreement for a third time by one hundred and twenty (120) days from the date of the second Extension of Time Date of June 19, 2002 in order to determine the full nature and extent of the Developer's failure to perform one or more of the material duties or obligations under the Development Agreement and to deal with such failures as the City later determines to be appropriate; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Development Agreement dated September 19, 1989 by and between the City of San Jacinto and PR Equities, Ltd. (the "Development Agreement") is hereby modified pursuant to section 7.1 of the Development Agreement by extending the expiration date of the Development Agreement to October 17, 2002, which is one hundred and twenty (120) days following June 19, 2002. Except as expressly modified hereby all other terms, conditions and obligations of the Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 2. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption by the City Council. 2002. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 6th day of June Vote: Ayes: Noes: Abstain: Jim Conner Mayor Dorothy L. Chouinard City Clerk 201 E Main Street — San Jacinto, CA 92583 Phone: (909) 487-7339 Fax: (909) 654-3728 E-mail: sanjacintocityclerk@hotmail.com To: Nadav Manham City of San Jacinto From: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk Fax: 212 586-9429 Pages: 4 Phone: Date: 06/04/2002 Re: June 6, 2002 Agenda CC: [ Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply 0 Please Recycle Please find attached the Agenda for June 6, 2002. I believe the item you are interested in is 4.4 on said agenda. ENGINEER'S REPORT Annual Update LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 1 Fiscal Year 2002-2003 CITY OF SAN JACINTO June 6, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT 3 IMPROVEMENTS 4 Landscaping, Parks and Street Trees 4 Street Lights and Traffic Signals 5 MAINTENANCE ESTIMATE 6 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT 7 Zones 9 Landscape Zone - Zone A 9 Street Lighting Zone - Zone B 9 Park Zone - Zone D 10 Citywide Street Tree Zone - Zone E 10 ASSESSMENT FORMULA 11 Table - Assessment Formula Using Assessment Unit (AU) Method 13 Examples 18 ASSESSMENT ROLL APPENDIX - EXHIBITS EXHIBIT "A" - Boundary Map EXHIBIT "B" - Public Improvement Inventory Map EXHIBIT "C" - List of Parcels That Will Receive Park Assessments Due to One Hundred Percent (100%) Petition at the Time They Were Developed EXHIBIT "D" - Assessment Roll (Under Separate Cover) sjllpd01.rpt 21 INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, this report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. This report presents the engineering analysis for the 2002-2003 Fiscal Year for the district known as: LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING, AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 1 CITY OF SAN JACINTO (Hereinafter referred to as "District"). This District, by special benefit assessments, provides funding for the installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of street lights and traffic signals (including the maintenance of appurtenant horizontal and vertical surfaces); the installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaped areas (parkways, medians, etc.); the installation, operation, maintenance and servicing of municipal parks; and the installation and maintenance of street trees on a citywide basis; all of which are located on public land, in public rights -of -way, or in landscaping easement in the City of San Jacinto. In November of 1996, the voters of California passed Proposition 218 which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution. These new Constitutional provisions affect the procedural and approval requirements for the levy of assessments. Among other things, the new requirements provide that assessed parcels of real property must receive a special benefit from assessments. Assessments are also subject to new majority protest requirements. These new requirements apply, unless an assessment district meets certain exemptions set forth in Proposition 218. The following assessments are exempt from the procedures and approval process of Article XIIID of the California Constitution; A. Any assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and/or operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage systems or vector control; or B. Any assessment imposed pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment is initially imposed. Zone A (A-1, A-2 and A-3), Zone B and Zone E of the City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1 qualify as an existing assessment exempt under exemption "A" sjllpdOl.rpt described above. This conclusion has been reached using the definitions provided by the Office of the Controller for the State of California and the Guidelines Relating Gas Tax Expenditures published by the division of local government affairs. Under this definition, street improvements include, but are not limited to, such things as street lighting and parkway and median landscaping. Zone D park maintenance assessments within City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1 also qualify as an existing assessment exempt under exemption "B" described above in that the assessment district was originally formed and the assessment imposed pursuant to the district was consented to by all of the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed. The language of Articles XIIIC and XIIID will undoubtedly be subject to future legislation and court decisions in order to clarify the specific intent of these new Constitutional provisions. At the time that this report was prepared no such legislation or judicial guidance existed with regard to determining how the property owner consent exemption would apply. However, the drafter of these provisions, the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, has stated that it intended to exempt from the procedural and approval requirements those assessments being re -levied on an annual basis under an existing assessment district so long as the assessments are not increased. The proposed assessments for the 2002-2003 Fiscal Year for Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1 fall within this exemption because they are merely the annual levy for assessments previously consented to by property owners. Section 22573, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into different zones where, "by reason of variations in the nature, location and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of benefit from the improvements. A zone shall consist of all territory which will receive substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements." An assessment district may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. Although Proposition 218 mandates that parcels owned by public agencies be assessed if they receive special benefit from the improvements being serviced and maintained by the assessments; under the exemptions stated above, properties owned by public agencies, such as city, county, state, federal government, or board -governed special districts, are not assessed. sjllpdOl .rpt 2 BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT The boundary of the District is completely within the City limits of the City of San Jacinto and is shown on the Boundary Map (on file in the office of the City Clerk at the City Hall of San Jacinto as Exhibit "A"). Exhibit "A" serves as the assessment diagram for the District and is hereby made a part of this report by reference. All parcels of real property included within the District are described in detail on maps on file in the Riverside County Assessor's office. A copy of Exhibit "A" is included in the Appendix to this report. Lots and parcels within Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2, a Proposition 218 assessment district formed in April, 2002, are excluded from Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1. sjllpd01.rpt IMPROVEMENTS The facilities and items of servicing and maintenance included within the District are as follows: LANDSCAPING, PARKS AND STREET TREES A map showing the location of all landscaping subzones and park maintenance areas within the District, is on file at City Hall with the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto and is made a part of this report by reference (on file in the office of the City Clerk at the City Hall of San Jacinto as Exhibit "B "). Servicing means the furnishing of: 1. Water for the irrigation of any landscape, park improvement or street trees, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other appurtenant improvements. 2. Electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvement. Maintenance maintenance, 1. means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual operation and servicing of any improvement, including: Installation, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any landscape, park improvement or street trees, including turf, shrub and tree plantings, statuary, fountains, other ornamental structures, lights, electrical systems, playground equipment, playcourts, paving, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and public restrooms. 2. Removal of graffiti by washing, painting, grinding, sanding or other usual means. 3. Providing for the life, growth, health and beauty of landscaping and street trees, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury. 4. The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste. 5. Land preparation which may be necessary for installation, repair or replacement of landscape, park improvements or street trees, including grading, leveling, cutting and filling, sod, irrigation systems, sidewalks and drainage. sjllpd0l .rpt 4 STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS A map showing the location of all street lights within the District, is on file at City Hall with the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto and is made a part of this report by reference (on file in the office of the City Clerk at the City Hall of San Jacinto as Exhibit "B"). Servicing means the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas or other illuminating agent for public street lighting and traffic signal facilities. Maintenance means the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual installation, maintenance, operation and servicing of any improvement, including repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of a component of the street lighting system, traffic signal system, or appurtenant horizontal or vertical surfaces (including graffiti removal). sjllpd01.rpt 5 CITY OF SAN JACINTO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT No. 1 MAINTENANCE ESTIMATE 2002-2003 FISCAL YEAR BENEFIT ZONES Landscaping Lighting Parks Street Trees Cost Item Cost Items A-1 A-2 A-3 B C D E Totals City-wide Soboba Springs Rancho San Jacinto Lights No Lights City -Wide Personnel Services $55,966 $10,386 $10,077 -- -- $20,711 -- $97,140 Maintenance & Operations Supplies & Materials -- -- -- 5,844 -- -- -- $5,844 Professional & Specialized Services 19,903 2,632 112,402 18,264 -- 109,000 -- $262,201 Repair & Maintenance 48,117 1,365 7,827 47,543 -- 15,000 -- $119,852 Contracts, Leases & Rents 50,631 12,464 35,414 51,840 -- -- -- $150,349 Utilities 81,935 11,441 16,048 112,472 -- 25,531 -- $247,427 Insurance & Bonds -- -- -- -- -- -- -- $0 Capital Outlays -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Interfund Transfer (General Fund) -- -- (106,000) -- -- (124,000) -- ($230,000) TOTALS $256,552 $38,288 $75,768 $235,963 $0 $46,242 $0 Amount per AU $34.76 $229.96 $77.00 $25.89 $0 $14.67 $0 TOTAL AMOUNT TO ASSESSMENT $652,814 Notes: 1. Personnel Services include salaries and fringe benefits. 2. Supplies and Materials include office supplies, uniforms and safety equipment, small tools, etc. 3. Professional and Specialized Services include assessment engineering, legal counsel, City administration and County Auditor fees. 4. Repair and Maintenance includes building and vehicle R&M, parts and supplies for landscaping, irrigation and mowing, and street light R&M. 5. Contracts, Leases and Rents include weekend restroom maintenance, landscape maintenance contracts, traffic signal maintenance provided by Riverside County/CALTRANS, and vertical surface maintenance (graffiti abatement). 6. Utilities include water, electricity, and street light maintenance provided by SCE and City of San Jacinto. 6 METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT The net amount to be assessed upon lands within the District in accordance with this report is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefit to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements, namely the maintenance and servicing of public landscaping, lighting and park facilities within such District. The maintenance and servicing of public landscaping, lighting, park facilities and street trees installed and constructed in public places in the City of San Jacinto provides a special benefit which is received by each and every lot or parcel within the specified zones of benefit in the District. Landscaping and street trees within the District enhance the aesthetic appeal of parcels within the landscaping and street tree zones. Such landscaping improves erosion resistance and dust control. The streets within the District improve access to all lots or parcels assessed. Street lights improve ingress and egress, from such lots or parcels by illuminating access after sunset. Such street lights, by so improving ingress and egress, improve the security of such lots or parcels by improving the nighttime visibility of such lots or parcels and improve the access of emergency vehicles thereto and in the case of commercial lots or parcels, facilitate the opening and operation of business uses after sunset. The primary benefits of landscaping and street trees are as set forth below: 1. Improved aesthetic appeal of nearby parcels. 2. Green space within the urban environment. 3. Enhances wind breaks. 4. Improved erosion resistance. 5. Improved dust control. 6. Tends to instill a sense of pride within the neighborhood. 7. The enhancement of the value of property which results from the foregoing benefits. The primary benefits of municipal parks are as set forth below: 1. Designated sites where children may gather to play without danger from traffic. 2. Designated sites where adult, youth and family activities can take place (i.e., picnics, baseball and softball leagues, soccer leagues, other athletic activities, art festivals, animal shows and training, etc.) 3. Green space and open space within the urban environment. sjllpd01.rpt 7 4. Availability of public restrooms. 5. The enhancement of the value of property which results from the foregoing benefits. The primary benefits of street lighting are for the convenience, safety, security and protection of property, property improvements and goods as set forth below: 1. Improvement to traffic circulation and reduction in nighttime accidents and attendant human misery and decrease in personal property loss. 2. The deterrence of crime and aid to police protection. 3. Promotion of business during nighttime hours. 4. Increased nighttime safety on roads and highways. 5. The improved ability of pedestrians and motorists to see, which helps people safely find their way. 6. Improved ingress and egress to lots and parcels. 7. Reduction in vandalism and other criminal acts, and reduced damage to improvements. 8. The enhancement to the value of property which results from the foregoing benefits. sjllpdOl.rpt 8 ZONES The 1972 Act provides for areas within a district to be classified into different zones of benefit. The City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1 is divided into separate zones and sub -zones for financing landscaping, lighting and park improvements. The various zones and sub -zones are delineated on the Boundary Map (on file in the office of the City Clerk at the City Hall of San Jacinto as Exhibit "A"). 1. LANDSCAPE ZONE - ZONE A For the 2002-2003 fiscal year, the Zone A landscaping zone is divided into three (3) benefit sub - zones. These sub -zones are labeled Exhibits A-1, A-2 And A-3 and are comprised of the areas described below: Total Number of Landscape Zone Description Parcels in Subzone Subzone A-1 - All parcels in the fully inhabited areas of San Jacinto approximately bounded by the San Jacinto River, the southerly City Limit, the northerly prolongation of Pine Avenue, De Anza Drive, the San Diego Aqueduct, and the northerly City Limit to the San Jacinto River; with the exception of Subzones A-2 and A-3. Subzone A-2 - All parcels in the Soboba Springs (Village IV) Tract. Subzone A-3 - All parcels in the Rancho San Jacinto area. 2. STREET LIGHTING ZONE - ZONE B 6,865 175 1,052 For the 2002-2003 fiscal year, the street lighting zone is divided into two (2) benefit zones. These zones are labeled Zone B (lighted areas) and Zone C (non -lit outlying areas). The number of parcels within each zone is given below: Zone B: Zone C: Street Lighting Zone Description Those parcels in the City of San Jacinto that have street lights installed within close proximity or that are surrounded by areas that have street lights. Those parcels in the City of San Jacinto that have no street lights within a reasonable distance. These parcels are primarily in outlying areas with little or no population. sjllpdOl .rpt 9 Total Number of Parcels in Zone 7,781 836 3. PARK ZONE - ZONE D For the 2002-2003 fiscal year, the park zone is comprised of a single citywide benefit zone designated as Zone D. The number of parcels within Zone D is given below: Zone D - Park Zone Description All parcels in the District that are included in existing residential uses (including apartments, condominiums, PUD's, mobilehome parks, recreational vehicle parks, etc.); commercial/industrial uses; and churches/fraternal organizations; and are included in petitions signed when they were developed. No vacant parcels are included. 4. CITYWIDE STREET TREE ZONE - ZONE E Total Number of Parcels in Zone 4,248 For the 2002-2003 fiscal year, the citywide street tree zone is divided into two (2) benefit zones. These zones are labeled Zone E (populated areas) and Zone C (vacant or lightly populated outlying areas). Zone E and Zone B cover identical areas. Similarly, Zone C covers both non - lit areas as well as lightly populated areas. The number of parcels within each zone is given below: Street Tree Zone Description Zone E- Zone C - sjllpdOl .rpt Those parcels in the City of San Jacinto that will participate in the planned street tree installation and maintenance program in populated areas. Those parcels in the City of San Jacinto that are vacant or in lightly populated areas. These parcels are primarily in outlying areas. 10 Total Number of Parcels in Zone 7,781 836 ASSESSMENT FORMULA This formula used to calculate the amount spread to all parcels within the District for landscaping, street lighting, parks and street trees starts with the basic assessment unit (AU). The basic assessment unit is given a value of one (1) for a single- family residential parcel. From this base, the remaining parcels are related according to their equivalent benefit within each benefit zone or sub -zone. Zone A parcels are assessed for street landscaping separately in three (3) sub -zones. Zone B parcels are assessed for street lighting and Zone C parcels are not. Zone D residential and commercial/industrial parcels containing dwelling units or business establishments are assessed for municipal parks. Zone E parcels are assessed for the installation and maintenance of street trees and Zone C parcels are not. Vacant parcels (agricultural, residential or commercial/industrial) are assigned 0.5 AU for landscaping, street lighting and street trees because they have a partial benefit due to the overall enhancement of the area and to the increase in property value from the installation and/or maintenance and servicing of said public improvements. Vacant parcels are not assessed for park maintenance. Commercial/industrial and public utility parcels are assigned 3.0 AU per acre (1.0 AU minimum, 10.0 AU maximum) for landscaping, street lighting, parks and street trees based upon the fact that one acre of commercial/industrial property is the equivalent of three single family residences. Small residences (less than 1,000 square feet and/or less than 50 feet of frontage) (Land Use Code "RS") are assessed at a rate of 0.7 AU for landscaping and 1.0 AU for all other improvements because they are have the small frontage relative to landscaping but have the same benefit from street lights, park maintenance and street trees as other single-family residences. Condominiums and PUD's are assigned 0.9 AU for each type of maintenance because, although these units have most of the characteristics of a single family residence, they generally are somewhat smaller and have common areas and homeowner associations. Apartments and common unit condominiums are assigned 0.6 AU per apartment unit for landscape maintenance and 0.8 AU for each of the other types of indicated public improvement because apartment units are typically smaller than a single family residence. Mobilehomes are assigned 0.5 AU per mobilehome unit for landscaping and 0.7 AU for street lighting, parks and street trees because these units are generally smaller than single family residences or condominiums and are usually occupied by senior citizens who tend to benefit less from most of the indicated public facilities. Recreational vehicle (RV) parks (own or rental) are assessed at a rate of 0.3 AU for landscape maintenance and 0.7 AU for street lighting, and park and street tree maintenance for the same reasons cited for mobilehome parks, except that RV parks often have high vacancies, especially during the summer months. Railroad parcels are assessed 0.5 AU per acre (1.0 AU minimum, 5.0 AU maximum) for street lighting only because street lighting causes a reduction in vandalism on railroad property and increases safety at railroad crossings, but receive less benefit than does single a family residence because of the reduced activity on railroad tracks. Churches and fraternal organizations are assigned 0.5 AU per acre (1.0 AU minimum, 4.0 AU maximum) for each type of indicated public improvement because these parcels obtain benefit from each type of improvement, but at a reduced rate due to the periodic use of the property. Assessments by zone, if applicable, are additive. sjllpd01.rpt 11 ASSESSMENT FORMULA As the land use on any specific parcel changes from one fiscal year to the next, the assessment formula shall also change to reflect the change in land use. sjllpd0l.rpt 12 CITY OF SAN JACINTO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 1 ASSESSMENT FORMULA USING ASSESSMENT UNIT (AU) METHOD Land Use Code Land Use Zone A Landscaping Assessment Formula Zone B Lighting Assessment Formula Zone D Park Assessment Formula Zone E Street Tree Assessment Formula AA Agricultural Avocado Grove 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel AC AD AI AL AN AO AP AR Agricultural Citrus Grove Agricultural Dairy Agricultural Irrigated Farm Agricultural Livestock Agricultural Non -Irrigated Agricultural - Other Crops Agricultural Poultry Agricultural Residential 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 1.0 AU per Residential Unit AS AV AY Al CA CF Agricultural w/Structures Agricultural Vineyard Agricultural Vacant Agricultural Other Apartments Churches, Fraternal Orgs. 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.6 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Acre (1.0 AU min, 4.0 AU max) 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.8 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Acre (1.0 AU min, 4.0 AU max) 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.8 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Acre (1.0 AU min, 4.0 AU max) 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.8 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Acre (1.0 AU min, 4.0 AU max) sjllpd01.rpt 13 ASSESSMENT FORMULA USING ASSESSMENT UNIT (AU) METHOD (Continued) Land Use Code Land Use Zone A Landscaping Assessment Formula Zone B Lighting Assessment Formula Zone D Park Assessment Formula Zone E Street Tree Assessment Formula PD PI PL PN PO PP PR Ag Preserve Dairy Ag Preserve Irrigated Farm Ag Preserve Livestock Ag Preserve Non -Irrigated Ag Preserve Other Crops Ag Preserve Poultry Ag Preserve Residential 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 1.0 AU per Residential Unit PS PV PY P1 PX R- Ag Preserve w/Structures Ag Preserve Vineyard Ag Preserve Vacant Ag Preserve Other Ag Preserve Residential 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 1.0 AU per Residential Unit RA Residential Agriculture 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit RC Residential Condo/PUD 0.9 AU per Condo/PUD Unit 0.9 AU per Condo/PUD Unit 0.9 AU per Condo/PUD Unit 0.9 AU per Condo/PUD Unit RD Residential Common Unit 0.6 AU per Condo/PUD Unit 0.8 AU per Condo/PUD Unit 0.8 AU per Condo/PUD Unit 0.8 AU per Condo/PUD Unit RM Mobilehome Lot Only 0.7 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel 0.7 AU per MH Parcel sjllpdOl.rpt 15 ASSESSMENT FORMULA USING ASSESSMENT UNIT (AU) METHOD (Continued) Land Use Code Land Use Zone A Landscaping Assessment Formula Zone B Lighting Assessment Formula Zone D Park Assessment Formula Zone E Street Tree Assessment Formula RI Residential Single Family 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit R2 Residential Duplex/Triplex 0.8 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit RS Residential - Small 0.7 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit 1.0 AU per Residential Unit RR Railroad Parcels 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Acre (1.0 AU min, 5.0 AU max) 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel RV Recreational Vehicle Lot 0.3 AU per RV Parcel 0.5 AU per RV Parcel 0.5 AU per RV Parcel 0.5 AU per RV Parcel UP Public Utility 3.0 AU per Acre (1.0AUmin, 10.0 AU max) 3.0 AU per Acre (1.0AUmin, 10.0 AU max) 0.0 AU per Parcel 3.0 AU per Acre (1.0AUmin, 10.0 AU max) YD Vacant Desert 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel YM Vacant Mountainous 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel YP Vacant - Prob. Residential 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel YR Vacant Residential 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel YS Vacant Land Miscellaneous 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel YY Vacant Remainder 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel 0.0 AU per Parcel 0.5 AU per Parcel sjllpd01.rpt 16 ASSESSMENT FORMULA USING ASSESSMENT UNIT (AU) METHOD (Continued) Notes: I. Zone C is not assessed. 3. Public Utilities include gas, electricity, telephone, cable TV, etc. Public utility parcels are assessed in the same manner as commercial property because public utilities are "for profit" enterprises. 3. The fraternal organization category includes such organizations as the Elks Lodge, Moose Lodge, IOOF, Order of Eagles, Mason's, Women's Clubs, etc. 4. Public property includes that property that is exempt from assessment including property owned by the City, County, State, Federal Government, water districts and other special districts. sjllpd01.rpt 17 EXAMPLES (Street Lighting): The number of assessment units (AU) generated within the District for street lighting is 9,113.85. The dollars generated per AU in Zone B are $235,963.17- $25.89 /AU. 9,113.85 AU A commercial establishment on a 0.75-acre parcel. From the Assessment Unit Chart, commercial property is assessed at a rate of three (3) AU per acre. 0.75 acres x 3 AU acre = 2.25 AU. The FY 2002-2003 assessment for this commercial parcel is: 2.25 AU x $25.89/AU = $58.25. 2. A 22-dwelling unit apartment complex on one (1) parcel of land. From the Assessment Unit Chart, apartment buildings are assessed at a rate of 0.8 AU per apartment unit. The assessment for this apartment complex for FY 2002-2003 is: 22 units x 0.8 AU unit x $25.89 /AU = $455.66. A 12-acre agricultural parcel without a residence. sjllpd01.rpt From the Assessment Unit Chart: 0.5 AU/Parcel The FY 2002-2003 assessment for this parcel is: 0.5 AU x $25.89 /AU = $12.95. 18 EXAMPLES (Street Lighting): The number of assessment units (AU) generated within the District for street lighting is 9,113.85. The dollars generated per AU in Zone B are $235,963.17 $25.89 /AU. 9,113.85 AU A commercial establishment on a 0.75-acre parcel. From the Assessment Unit Chart, commercial property is assessed at a rate of three (3) AU per acre. 0.75 acres x 3 AU acre = 2.25 AU. The FY 2002-2003 assessment for this commercial parcel is: 2.25AU x $25.89/AU = $58.25. 2. A 22-dwelling unit apartment complex on one (1) parcel of land. From the Assessment Unit Chart, apartment buildings are assessed at a rate of 0.8 AU per apartment unit. The assessment for this apartment complex for FY 2002-2003 is: 22 units x 0.8 AU unit x $25.89/AU = $455.66. A 12-acre agricultural parcel without a residence. From the Assessment Unit Chart: 0.5 AU/Parcel The FY 2002-2003 assessment for this parcel is: 0.5 AU x $25.89/AU = $12.95. sjllpdOl.rpt 18 EXAMPLES (Landscape Maintenance): 1. The number of assessment units (AU) generated within the District for landscape maintenance in Subzone A-1 is 7,380.69. The estimated cost to maintain landscaping in Zone A-1 during FY 2002-2003 is $256,551.64. The dollars assessed per AU in Zone A- 1 are: $256,551.64 - $34.76. 7,380.69 /AU Therefore a single family residence in Subzone A-1 is assessed as follows: 1.0AUlresidence x $34.76/AU= $34.76. 2. The number of assessment units (AU) generated in Subzone A-2 for landscape maintenance is 166.50. Per the Landscape Maintenance Estimate on Page 6, the estimated cost to maintain landscaping in Zone A-2 during FY 2002-2003 is $38,288.34. The dollars assessed per AU in Subzone A-2 are: $38,288.34 - $229.96. 166.50 AU Therefore a single family residence in Subzone A-2 is assessed as follows: 1.0 AU l residence x $229.96/AU = $ 229.96. A small residence (Land Use Code "RS") in Subzone A-1 would be assessed for landscape maintenance as follows: 0.7 AU residence x $34.76 = $24.33. sjllpd0l.rpt 19 EXAMPLES (Park Maintenance): The number of assessment units (AU) generated within the District for park maintenance is 3,152.05. The dollars generated per AU in Zone D are: $46,242.49 - $14.67/AU. 3,152.05 AU 1. A single family residence. From the Assessment Unit Chart, a single family residence is assessed at a rate of one (1) AU per residence. The FY 2002-2003 assessment for this single family residence is: 1.OAU x $14.67/AU = $14.67. 2. A commercial establishment on a 0.75-acre parcel. From the Assessment Unit Chart, commercial property is assessed at a rate of three (3) AU per acre. 0.75 acres x 3 AU1 acre = 2.25 AU The FY 2002-2003 assessment for this commercial parcel is: 2.25 AU x $14.67/AU= $33.01. 3. A 22-dwelling unit apartment complex on one (1) parcel of land. From the Assessment Unit Chart, apartment buildings are assessed at a rate of 0.8 AU per apartment unit. 22 units x 0.8 AUI unit = 17.6 AU The assessment for this apartment complex for FY 2002-2003 is: 17.6 AU x $14.67/AU = $ 258.19. sjllpdOl .rpt 20 ASSESSMENT ROLL The individual 2002-2003 assessments, tabulated by Assessor's parcel number, are shown on Exhibit "D", the Assessment Roll, on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto and are made a part of this report by reference. GFB-FRIEDRICH & ASSOC., INC. HN A. FRIEDIQTCH, R ASSESSMENT ENGINEER sjllpd01.rpt 21 APPENDIX EXHIBIT "A" - Boundary Map EXHIBIT "B" - Public Improvement Inventory Map EXHIBIT "C" - List of Parcels That Will Receive Park Assessments Due to One Hundred Percent (100%) Petition at the Time They Were Developed. EXHIBIT "D" - Assessment Roll (Under Separate Cover) sjllpdOl .rpt CITY OF SAN JACINTO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 1 EXHIBIT "C" LIST OF PARCELS THAT WILL RECEIVE PARK ASSESSMENTS DUE TO ONE HUNDRED PERCENT (100%) PETITION AT THE TIME THEY WERE DEVELOPED. COMMON ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS TRACT NO. DESCRIPTION Book Page Parcel(s) 24907 Mt. Valier 547 19 All 20 All 21 All 27335 Richard Beck 431 410 001 thru 015 26729 Adjacent to Montage 433 401 019 thru 023 26020 Montage 433 40 All 25307 Horizons of San Jacinto 431 301 038 thru 076 25099 Castle Court 437 120 048 thru 058 24745 Forecast Development 434 370 009 thru 021 371 010 thru 039 24738 New Beginnings 431 36 All 37 All 24713 Annandale Park 434 43 All 24594 Jack in the Box / Chevron 434 080 030 & 035 24330 Las Brisas / Corsica 433 38 All 39 All 24190 Windsor Place 437 39 All 24140 Hermosa Homes / FN Development 431 31 All 32 All 33 All 34 All 35 All sjllpd0l.rpt C-1 22950 The Villas 434 40 All 46 All 23436 S/O Commonwealth between Girard & Hewitt 439 31 All 32 All 22882 St. Michel 434 35 All 41 All 42 All 44 All 45 All 22667 Ann Arbor Homes 437 32 All 23791 Summerhill 433 37 All 23790 Evans & Las Rosas 433 36 All TRACT NO. COMMON SSESSOR'S PARCEL N DESCRIPTION B u c Book Pa e Parcel(s) 24054 Peacock Financial 438 46 All 47 All 24048 Peacock Financial 438 41 All 24047-1 Peacock Financial 439 30 All 23793 Barrat American 438 40 All 23789 Esplanade & Las Rosas 433 34 All 35 All 22665 Seventh & Pine 431 38 All 39 All 40 All 22347 B & L 21900 Soboba Springs 433 32 All 33 All 24052 Treasures 438 44 All 23300 Industrial Condos 435 212 001 thru 036 435 29 All sjllpdO1.rpt C-2 v w1 Mayor's Agenda Regular Meeting - San Jacinto City Council June 6, 2002, 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Invocation: Call on Father Earl Henry, St. Joseph's Catholic Church 1.4 Call on to lead the Pledge of Allegiance 1.5 Special Presentations: 1.5,-' 31 'Pf 4totteris None 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Now is the time for the public to address the Council on any subject not listed on the agenda. Invite public comment from any person wishing to speak on any subject not on the Agenda -- limitation of 3 minutes. A recap of the nonagendized comments will be addressed under item number 2.1 during the City's second regular meeting of the month. 3. PUBLIC HEARING 3.1 Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2-02 / Ordinance No. 1102-02-08 / An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Adding Section 23.76, Wireless Telecommunications Facilities, to the San Jacinto Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance 340 / Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration and conduct Public Hearing; waive reading in full and motion first reading of Ordinance No. 1102-02-08 to read by title only: Ordinance No. 1102-02-08 / An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Adding Section 23.76, Wireless Telecommunications Facilities, to the San Jacinto Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance 340 ❑ Call on Planning Director, Tim Hults for Staff recommendations ❑ Open Public Hearing at p.m. ❑ Accept Public Comment o Close Public Hearing at p.m. Page 2 of 4 o Call for Council Discussion o Call for a motion & vote to adopt negative declarations o Call for a motion & vote waiving reading in full and motion to include first reading of Ordinance No. 1102-02-08 to read by title only: Ordinance No. 1102-02-08 / An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Adding Section 23.76, Wireless Telecommunications Facilities, to the San Jacinto Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance 340 Note: Council Member making motion is to read title aloud as printed above if waiving full reading. 4. CITY DEPARTMENTS 4.1 Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1 (LLPD No. 1) / Accept Engineer's Report and Declare the Intent to Levy and Collect Assessments within LLPD No. 1 and Give Notice of and Set the Time and Place for the Hearing on the Levy of the Proposed Assessment / Finance Director o Call on Bernie Simon Finance Director for Staff recommendations o Ask for Public Comments o Call for Council Discussion o Call for motion to accept the Engineer's Report and Declare the Intent to Levy and Collect Assessments within LLPD No. 1 o Give Notice after setting the time and place for the hearing on the Levy of the proposed assessment 4.2 Cooperative Agreement between the State of California Department of Transportation and the City of San Jacinto for the Interim Realignment of SR 79 / Approve agreement and Authorize Mayor to execute agreement / City Manager o Call on Jake Wager, City Manager, for Staff recommendations. o Call for public comment o Call for Council discussion o Call for motion / vote 4.3 Local Appointments List (aka Maddy List) / Ratification of Mayor Conner's City Council Member Appointments / Calendar Information / City Clerk o Council discussion / comments Call for Motion to approve Mayor's Recommendation for the following: SEE ATTACHED LIST o Call for motion / vote — either separately or as a whole o For the record note July 4, 2002 meeting that would role to July 5th is to be adjourned to the July 18, 2002. Page 3 of 4 4.4 Amendment No. 5 to Development Agreement 1-89 / Authorize extension of time to October 17, 2002 / Planning Director o Call on Planning Director for Staff recommendations o Call for public comment o Call for Council discussion o Call for motion / vote 4.5 Actions for November 5, 2002 Election 4.5.1 Resolution No. / A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Calling a General Municipal Election on November 5, 2002 / Adopt / City Clerk o Call on City Clerk Dorothy Chouinard for Staff recommendations o Call for public comment o Call for Council discussion o Call for motion / vote 4.5.2 Resolution No. / A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, Adopting Regulations for Candidates for Elective Office, Pertaining to the Electorate and the Costs thereof for the General Municipal Election to be Held in the City of San Jacinto on Tuesday, November 5, 2002 / Adopt / City Clerk o Call on City Clerk Dorothy Chouinard for Staff recommendations o Call for public comment o Call for Council discussion o Call for motion / vote 4.6 Optical Imaging Supplies and Equipment / Review and Approve specifications for supplies and equipment and Authorize purchase / City Clerk o Call on City Clerk Dorothy Chouinard for Staff recommendations o Call for public comment o Call for Council discussion o Call for motion / vote 4.7 City of San Jacinto Budget Fiscal Year 2002/2003 / Adopt / Finance Director o Continue until June 20, 2002 Page 4 of 4 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by Council Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the Redevelopment Agency, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. Are there any questions or requests for clarification from the Council on the consent items? Is there a Council Member or member of the public who wishes to pull an item? If not, call for a motion to approve the Consent Calendar 5.1 through 5.3. 5.1 Warrant Register for Warrants, Prepaid Checks, and Payroll Checks Period Ending 06/06/02 / Approve / Finance Director 5.2 May 16, 2002 Budget Workshop Meeting Minutes / Approve / City Clerk 5.3 Treasurer's Report April 30, 2002 / Receive and File /Finance Director Recess the regular meeting at Agenda. Resume Regular Meeting at p.m. to consider the Redevelopment Agency p.m. following the Redevelopment Agency Meeting. 6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS 7. CLOSED SESSION None 8. ADJOURNMENT ✓ Meeting adjourns at P.m- CHAIRMAN'S AGENDA - AMENDED REGULAR MEETING — SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY June 6, 2002 - Following Regular City Council Consent Calendar 1. ORGANIZATION • Call to Order • Roll Call 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS Now is the time for the public to address the Agency on any subject not listed on the agenda. Any person may address the Agency on any subject pertaining to Redevelopment Agency business not listed on the Agenda during this portion of the Meeting. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the Council. Call for Public Comments. 3. PUBLIC HEARING: None 4. CITY DEPARTMENTS: None 5. CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by Agency Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the Redevelopment Agency, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Agency President; state their name, address an the consent calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. Are there any questions for clarification from the Agency on the Consent Item? If not, call for a motion to approve the Consent Calendar, 5.1 5.1 Approve Minutes of Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency of May 16, 2002. 6. CHAIRMAN / MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSION Call for Reports Page 1 of 2 OPEN SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS Call on Attorney John Brown for an explanation to the Council for announcements. CLOSED SESSION: PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS Property: APN (Assessor's Parcel Number) 439110055 NE Corner of San Jacinto Avenue & Commonwealth Avenue Agency Negotiator: Jake Wager Negotiating Parties: Gary Spates and Paul Lawrence Under Negotiations: Price 8. ADJOURNMENT Call for adjournment p.m. (note time) and resume Regular Meeting of City Council. Page 2 of 2 J SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON' An EDISON INTENT I PION IL Compan. June 6, 2002 Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 RE: Agenda Item 3.1 Zoning Ordinance Amendment No 1102-02-08 My name is Mary Drury, Public Affairs Project Manager for Southern California Edison (SCE). Because of Bob Lopez, who is usually the SCE representative to the City of San Jacinto, being out of town, I have been asked to address the Council regarding this agenda item. SCE has contractual arrangements with several wireless companies in allowing them to attach their equipment to SCE poles, towers and other accessible equipment (where it is compatible) once the wireless company has obtained the necessary permits and/or licenses from the public agency within the area where the wireless equipment will be located. As such, Section 23.76, 2(b) - height restriction - at 15 feet does not allow a wireless company to make use of already existing equipment that exceeds this height such as the SCE poles and towers. The wireless companies are frequently requesting 30 to 50 foot high locations. We respectfully suggest the City Council may want to make this change so that, where equipment of this height already exists, the wireless equipment can be attached without creating greater visual impact. For Section 23.76, 2(c) adding the definition of a "structure" may provide clarity for staff and the wireless companies in that there will be a general idea of what the city has contemplated as acceptable locations for such wireless attachments. Other cities 36100 Cathedral Canyon Dr. Cathedral City, CA 92234 have used language similar to "appropriate types of existing structures may include, but are not limited to: buildings, water tanks, telephone and utility towers, poles, sign standards, traffic signals, light standards and roadway overpasses". The final suggestion is for Section 23.76, 2(f) "antenna and/or monopole will be, if reasonably possible, co -located with a site such as an existing electric utility substation or other area that is in an industrial or commercial zone . Again, many other cities have found that by combining utility uses within an existing site similar to the SCE electric substations a city is able to maximize the use of existing sites without substantial impact on the surrounding area. Should the Council or staff want to discuss this further with us at another time, we would be pleased to make the necessary arrangements for a meeting as Bob Lopez will be returning to his Romoland office on Monday, June 10th. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. truly yours, MARY DRUR Public Affairs Project Manager cc: Bob Lopez, Region Manager and in accordance with the CFD. CITY hereby acknowledges that improvement scheduling, dates or times of performance by either party hereto may be subject to revision from time to time due to economic conditions and other causes beyond the control of OWNER. Such scheduling revisions shall be mutually agreed upon in writing and shall be deemed to be within the framework of this Agreement as presently drafted and executed and shall not constitute grounds for termination of this Agreement or amendments to this Agreement requiring new notice and hearings under state law and/or city ordi- nances. 3.3 Implementation Schedule. The parties recognize that the construction of the Public Facilities is dependent upon many variables. CITY shall use its best efforts to act in conformance with the phased implementation schedules contained in Exhibit "E", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, or any revised schedules as they reflect the actual cash flow, status of development and other factors. 3.4 Procedure for Payment of OWNER's Share for Public Facilities. 3.4.1 OWNER's Fair and Reasonable Share. OWNER'S fair and reasonable share of fees and costs for the Public Facilities has been estimated for the creation of the CFD. If adjustments to individual lot boundaries are made, this Agreement will be amended accordingly, apportioning the total fees among the lots as adjusted on a reasonable basis. 3.4.2 Collection by CITY from Other Property Owners of Fair Share. CITY shall collect fees (like or similar to the fees which are paid by OWNER pursuant to this Agreement) from other owners of properties deriving benefit from the Public Facilities (including, without limitation, purchasers or other transferees of improved or unimproved land and finished homes constructed by OWNER), so that OWNER shall not be placed in an unfair, disadvantageous or non- competitive situation. 3.5 Reservations and Dedications. Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement and the Development Plan, no dedications or reservations of the Property shall be required by CITY of OWNER in connection with the Development other than for one school, normal streets, sidewalks or public utility and utility access easements customarily required by the CITY. ARTICLE 4 DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY 4.1 Public Benefits. The CITY, by entering into this Agreement, will receive the benefit of land dedications and the construction and installation of the Public Facilities in accordance with the Development Plan. OWNER's obligation to dedicate land and provide such Public Facilities is in consideration of and subject to receipt by OWNER of the benefits of this Agreement. 4.2 Vested Right to Develop. Notwithstanding any future action of CITY, whether by ordinance, resolution, initiative or otherwise, during the term of this Agreement the rules, regulations and official policies applicable to and governing the Development shall be the Existing Land Use Regulations. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, OWNER shall have a vested right to develop the Property in accor- dance with and to the extent of the Development Plan. 4.3 Affect of Agreement on Land Use Regulations. Except as otherwise provided under the terms of this Agreement, the rules, regulations and official policies governing permitted uses of the Property, the density and intensity of use of the Property, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings and the design, improvement and con- struction standards and specifications applicable to the Development of the Property shall be the Existing Land Use Regulations. In connection with any Subsequent Development Approval, CITY shall exercise its discretion or take action in accordance with the Development Plan, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement. CITY shall accept for proces- sing, review and action all applications for Subsequent Development Approvals and such applications shall proceed in the normal manner for processing such matters. 4.4 Timing_ of Development. The parties acknowledge that OWNER cannot at this time predict when or the rate at which phases of the Property will be developed. Such deci- sions depend upon numerous factors which are not within the control of OWNER, such as market orientation and demand, interest rates, absorption, completion and other similar factors. Since the California Supreme Court held, in Pardee Construction Company v. City of Camarillo, 37 Ca1.3d 475 (1984), that the failure of the parties therein to provide for the timing of development resulted in a later -adopted initiative, restricting the timing of development, to prevail over such parties' agreement, it is the parties' intent to cure that deficiency by acknowledging and providing that OWNER shall have the right to develop the Property in such order and at such rate and at such times as OWNER deems 10 appropriate within the exercise of its subjective business judgment. 4.5 Changes and Amendments. The parties acknowledge that refinement and further work on the Development will require Subsequent Development Approvals and may demonstrate that changes are appropriate and mutually desirable in the Existing Development Approvals. In the event OWNER finds that a change in the Existing Development Approvals is necessary or appropriate, OWNER shall apply for a Subsequent Development Approval to effectuate such change and CITY shall process and act on such application in accordance with the Existing Land Use Regulations, except as otherwise provided by this Agreement including the Reservations of Authority. If approved, any such change in the Existing Development Approvals shall be incorporated herein as an addendum of Exhibit "A", and may be further changed from time to time as provided in this section. Unless otherwise required by law, as determined in CITY's reasonable discretion, a change to the Existing Development Approvals shall be deemed "minor" and not require an amendment to this Agreement provided such change does not: (a) Alter the permitted uses of the Property as a whole; or, (b) Increase the density or intensity of use of the Property as a whole; or, (c) Increase the maximum height and size of permitted buildings; or, (d) Delete a requirement for the reservation or dedication of land for public purposes within the Property as a whole; or, (e) Constitute a project requiring a subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report pursuant to Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code. 4.6 Reservations of Authority. 4.6.1 Limitations, Reservations and Excep- tions. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, CITY may, from time to time, adopt Subsequent Land Use Regulations which shall apply to the Development and the Property, but only if both of the following apply: (a) the Subsequent Land Use Regulation is applied on a CITY -wide or community -wide basis; and (b) the Subsequent Land Use Regulation is not in conflict with Existing Land Use Regulations or the Development Plan. Any Subsequent Land Use Regulation, whether adopted by initiative or otherwise, limiting the rate or timing of the Development shall be deemed to conflict with the Development Plan. 4.6.2 Subsequent Development Approvals. This Agreement shall not prevent CITY, in acting on Subsequent Development Approvals, from applying Subsequent Land Use Regulations which do not conflict with the Development Plan, nor shall this Agreement prevent CITY from denying or condi- tionally approving any Subsequent Development Approval on the basis of the Existing Land Use Regulations or any Subsequent Land Use Regulation not in conflict with the Development Plan. 4.6.3 Modification or Suspension by State or Federal Law. In the event that State or Federal laws or regulations, enacted or amended after the Effective Date of this Agreement ("Subsequent State or Federal Regulations"), prevent or preclude compliance with one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, or require changes in plans, maps or permits approved by CITY, then the following shall apply: (a) Delivery of Notice of Subsequent State or Federal Regulation. The party first becoming aware of such Subsequent State or Federal Regulation shall, within fifteen (15) days thereafter, give the other party written notice of such Subsequent State or Federal Regulation together with a copy thereof and a statement of the provision(s) of this Agreement with which such Subsequent State or Federal Regulation is in conflict; (b) Negotiation by Parties. The parties shall, within thirty (30) days of delivery of such notice, meet and confer in good faith in a reasonable attempt to modify this Agreement to comply with the Subsequent State or Federal Regulation; and (c) City Council Hearing. Thereafter, regardless of whether the parties reach an agreement on the effect of such Subsequent State or Federal Regulation upon this Agreement, the matter shall be scheduled for hearing before City Council; ten (10) days written notice of such hearing shall be given pursuant to California Government Code Section 65854.5 and San Jacinto Ordinance No. 831. The City Council, at such hearing, shall determine the exact modification or 12 suspension which is necessary because of the Subsequent State or Federal Regulation. At the hearing, OWNER shall have the right to offer testimony. Any modifi- cation or suspension of this Agreement shall be under- taken only upon the affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the authorized voting members of the City Council. Any such suspension or modification shall be subject to judicial review under Section 9.9 of this Agreement. (d) This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect to the extent it is not inconsistent with such Subsequent State or Federal Regulations and to the extent such Subsequent State or Federal Regulations do not render such remaining provisions impractical to enforce. 4.7 Provision of Real Property Interests by CITY. In any instance where OWNER is required to construct any Public Facilities on land not owned by OWNER, CITY shall negotiate the purchase of the necessary easements or other real prop- erty interests to allow OWNER to construct the Public Facilities as required by this Agreement and, if necessary, in accordance with the procedures established by law, use its power of eminent domain to condemn such required easements or other real property interests, provided that OWNER shall pay all legal fees and other costs involved in such condemnation. 4.8 Tentative Tract Map Extension. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 66452.6 of the Government Code, any tentative subdivision map or tentative parcel map, heretofore or hereafter approved in connection with the Development, shall be granted an extension of time in accordance with the Existing Land Use Regulations. 4.9 Vesting Tentative Maps. If any tentative or final subdivision map, -or tentative or final parcel map, heretofore or hereafter approved in connection with the Development of the Property, is a vesting map under the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Section 66410, et seq.) and if this Agreement is determined by a final judgment to be invalid or unenforceable insofar as it grants a vested right to develop to OWNER, then and to that extent the rights and protections afforded OWNER under the laws and ordinances applicable to vesting maps shall supersede the provisions of this Agreement. Except as set forth immediately above, the Development shall occur only as provided in this Agreement, and the provisions in this Agreement shall be controlling over any conflicting provisions of law or ordinance concern- ing vesting maps. 4.10 Moratoriums. If CITY is unable to satisfy itself that CITY is capable of financing required public facilities and thus must declare a limited development moratorium until such time as the financing for such facilities is available, OWNER shall be exempt from any such limited development moratorium, because OWNER, by this Agreement, has secured payment of its fair share of the Public Facilities. 4.11 Cooperation in Securing Governmental Permits/Con- flicts of Laws. CITY shall cooperate with OWNER in the securing of all permits which may be required by CITY or any other governmental agency for the Development pursuant to this Agreement. ARTICLE 5 DEVELOPMENT FEES 5.1 Development Fees. In connection with the develop- ment of the Property certain Public Facilities will be constructed pursuant to the conditions of approval of the Specific Plan. CITY acknowledges and agrees that the cost to construct these Public Facilities equals or exceeds the total-. Development Fees related to the Public Facilities. CITY further agrees to accept the Public Facilities listed below in lieu of any and all Development Fees related thereto. 5.1.1 Construction of four (4) eight -phase traffic signals in lieu of all signalization fees. 5.1.2 Construction of a storm drain system from the intersection of Evans Street and Hewitt Avenue to the Buena Vista Detention basin in lieu of all drainage fees. 5.1.3 Dedication and Construction of a five -acre park located on Esplanade Avenue in accordance with the Specific Plan in -lieu of all park fees. 5.1.4 All public safety fees will be paid through a yearly assessment adopted by the City Council. Therefore, no other public safety fee will be levied or assessed on the Development or the Property during the term of this Agreement. 5.2 No Increases. CITY agrees not to levy any new Development Fees or increase the existing Development Fees specifically on the Development that are not levied on other developments in the CITY. Any new Development Fees or increases must be uniform city-wide so as to not put the OWNER or the Development in a disadvantageous marketing position with other developments in the CITY. 19 ARTICLE 6 MORTGAGEES 6.1 Mortgagee Protection. The parties hereto agree that this Agreement shall not prevent or limit OWNER, in any manner, at OWNER's sole discretion, from encumbering the Property or any portion thereof or any improvement thereon by any Mortgage securing financing with respect to the Property. CITY acknowledges that the lenders providing such financing may require certain Agreement interpretations and modifications and agrees upon request, from time to time, to meet with OWNER and representatives of such lenders to negotiate in good faith any such request for interpretation or modification. CITY will not unreasonably withhold its consent to any such requested interpretation or modification provided such interpretation or modification is consistent with the intent and purposes of this Agreement. Any Mortgagee of the Property shall be entitled to the following rights and privileges: 6.1.1 Neither entering into the Agreement nor a breach of this Agreement shall defeat, render invalid, diminish or impair the lien of any Mortgage on the Property made in good faith and for value, unless otherwise required by law. 6.1.2 The Mortgagee and its successors and assigns, of any Mortgage encumbering the Property, or any part thereof, which has submitted a request in writing to the CITY in the manner specified herein for giving notices, shall be entitled to receive written notification from CITY of any default by OWNER in the performance of OWNER's obligations under this Agreement. 6.1.3 If CITY timely receives a request from a Mortgagee request-ing a copy of any notice of default given to OWNER under the terms of this Agreement, CITY shall provide a copy of that notice to the Mortgagee within ten (10) days of sending the notice of default to OWNER. The Mortgagee shall have the right, but not the obligation, to cure the default during the remaining cure period allowed such party under this Agreement. 6.1.4 Any Mortgagee who comes into possession of the Property, or any part thereof, pursuant to foreclosure of the Mortgage or deed in lieu of such foreclosure, shall take the Property, or part thereof, subject to the terms of this Agreement. 15 ARTICLE 7 DEFAULT AND REMEDIES 7.1 Termination or Modification of Agreement for Default of OWNER. CITY may terminate or modify this Agreement for any failure of OWNER to perform any material duty or obligation of OWNER under this Agreement, or to comply in good faith with the terms of this Agreement (here- inafter referred to as "default"); provided, however, CITY may terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section only after providing a written notice of default to OWNER setting forth the nature of the default and the actions, if any, required by OWNER to cure such default and, where the default can be cured, OWNER has failed to take such actions and cure such default within sixty (60) days after the effective date of such notice or, in the event that such default cannot be cured within such sixty (60) day period but can be cured within a longer time, has failed to commence the actions necessary to cure such default within such sixty (60) day period and to diligently proceed to complete such actions and cure such default. 7.2 Termination of Agreement for Default of CITY. OWNER may terminate this Agreement only after the default by CITY in the performance of a material term of this Agreement and written notice of default by OWNER thereof to CITY and, where the default can be cured, the failure of CITY to cure such default within sixty (60) days after the effective date of such notice or, in the event that such default cannot be cured within such sixty (60) day period, the failure of CITY to commence to cure such default within such sixty (60) day period and to diligently proceed to complete such actions and to cure such default. 7.3 Specific Performance. The parties acknowledge that money damages and remedies at law generally are inade- quate and specific performance is a particularly appropriate remedy for the enforcement of this Agreement and should be available to all parties because, due to the size, nature and scope of the Development, it may not be practical or possible to restore the Property to its natural condition once imple- mentation of this Agreement has begun. After such implemen- tation, OWNER may be foreclosed from other choices it may have had to utilize the Property or portions thereof. OWNER has invested significant time and resources and performed extensive planning and processing of the Development in agreeing to the terms of this Agreement and will be investing even more significant time and resources in implementing the Development in reliance upon the terms of this Agreement, and 16 it is not possible to determine the sum of money which would adequately compensate OWNER for such efforts. 7.4 Failure or Delay Not a Waiver. Failure or delay in giving notice of breach pursuant to this article shall not be a waiver of any breach. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, any failure or delay by the other party in asserting any of its rights or remedies as to any breach shall not operate as a waiver of any breach or of any such rights or remedies or deprive such party of its right to institute and maintain any action which it may deem necessary to protect, assert or enforce any such rights or remedies. 7.5 Cooperation in the Event of Legal Challenge. In the event of any legal action instituted by a third party or other governmental entity or official challenging the validity of any provision of this Agreement, the parties hereby agree to cooperate fully with each other in defending said action and the validity of each provision of this Agreement; however, OWNER shall be liable for all legal expenses and costs in such defense. 7.6 Cooperation in the Event of a Partial Default. In the event OWNER assigns this Agreement in connection with a transfer of a part of the Property and a default occurs which adversely impacts the development of that portion of the Property owned by non -defaulting parties, prior to taking any action to amend or terminate this Agreement, CITY shall conduct a special review which shall be subject to the same notice provisions as provided in Article 8 for periodic reviews. As a part of the special review, the CITY shall describe the nature of the default, identify the defaulting party, and give the non -defaulting parties the right to propose alternatives to amendment or termination of this Agreement. ARTICLE 8 PERIODIC REVIEW 8.1 Periodic Review by CITY. CITY shall, at least once every twelve (12) months during the term of this Agreement, determine whether OWNER is in good faith substan- tially complying with the terms of this Agreement pursuant to the following provisions: 8.1.1 Delivery of Reports; OWNER's Right to Be Heard. CITY shall, to the extent practical, deliver to OWNER copies of all staff reports and related exhibits concerning OWNER's performance under this Agreement at least thirty (30) 17 calendar days prior to any such review or action upon this Agreement by the Planning Commission or City Council. Upon OWNER's request, OWNER shall be permitted an opportunity to be heard orally and in writing regarding its performance under this Agreement before any written action is taken by the Planning Commission or City Council under this Agreement. 8.1.2 OWNER'S Duty to Demonstrate Good Faith Substantial Compliance. The parties recognize that this Agreement and the documents incorporated herein could be deemed to contain numerous requirements, including, without limitation, construction standards and landscape standards, and that evidence of compliance with each and every such requirement would be a wasteful use of the parties' resources. Accordingly, OWNER shall be deemed to have satisfied its duty of demonstration when it presents evidence of its good faith and substantial compliance with (a) the provisions of the Specific Plan, (b) the CITY's Zoning Ordinance No. 340 as amended on August 16, 1988, by Ordinance No. 846, (c) Existing Land Use Regulations concerning the uses, number, types, densities and .sizes of structures completed, (d) required reservations and dedications to CITY, (e) the payment by OWNER of its fair share of the cost of the Public Facilities pursuant to this Agreement, and (f) comple- tion of the Public Facilities listed in Section 5.1, above. Either party may address any requirement of this Agreement. However, CITY shall deliver thirty (30) days written notice to OWNER of any requirement it desires to be addressed. If, at any time of hearing an issue not previously identified in writing is required to be addressed by CITY, the hearing at the request of either party shall be continued to afford sufficient time for analysis and preparation. 8.1.3 Substantial Evidence That OWNER Has Not Complied with This Agreement. If, as a result of a periodic review, CITY finds, on the basis of substantial evidence, that OWNER has not complied in good faith with items described in Section 8.1.2, CITY may terminate or modify this Agreement pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.1. 8.1.4 Letter of Compliance. If OWNER is foind to be in compliance with this Agreement after a periodic review, the CITY shall, upon request by OWNER, at any time after a periodic review, issue a Letter of Compliance to OWNER stating that, after the most recent periodic review and based upon information known by or made known to the CITY: (a) this Agreement remains in effect; and (b) OWNER is not in default. This Letter of Compliance shall contain information necessary to communicate notice of the finding of com- 18 pliance. OWNER may record the Letter of Compliance in the official records of the County of Riverside. ARTICLE 9 MISCELLANEOUS 9.1 Endorsed Delay and Extension of Times for Perfor- mances. In addition to specific provisions of this Agreement, performance by either party hereunder shall not be deemed to be in default where delays or defaults are demonstrated to be due to acts of God, war, or omissions of other governmental agencies, or other causes beyond the reasonable control of such party. An extension of time in writing for any such cause shall be granted for the period of the enforced delay, or longer as mutually agreed upon, which period shall com- mence to run from the time or commencement of the cause of delay. 9.2 Amendment or Cancellation of Agreement. Subject to the provisions of Section 9.3, this Agreement may be amended from time to time by the mutual consent of the parties hereto and only in the same manner as its adoption by an ordinance as set forth in California Government Code Sections 65867, 65867.5 and 65868. The term "Agreement" as used in this Agreement shall include any such amendment properly approved and executed. 9.3 Operating Memoranda. The parties acknowledge that refinement and further development of the Project may require that certain changes, including but not limited to relocation of density and structures within the Property, may be appro- priate and in the mutual best interests of the parties. If and when the parties find that such changes or adjustments are necessary and/or appropriate, they shall effectuate such changes or adjustments through operating memoranda approved in writing by the parties, which, after execution, shall be attached hereto as addenda and become a part hereof, and may be further changed and amended from time to time as neces- sary, with further concurrence by CITY and OWNER. Unless required by law to maintain the enforceability of this Agreement, no such operating memoranda shall require prior notice or hearing, or constitute an amendment to this Agreement. To the extent that CITY determines an operating memorandum is limited in its scope and effect to a portion of the Property (such as the relocation of density or use within a single ownership, which relocation has no external effect on general infrastructure requirements or financing of other property owners), consent to such operating memoranda shall be sufficient if provided by CITY and the OWNER or assignee 19 of OWNER which owns the affected portion of the Property at the time such operating memorandum is executed. Neither OWNER nor any assignee of OWNER shall be subject to any change in obligations or entitlements pursuant to an operat- ing memorandum which OWNER or such assignee of OWNER has not executed. 9.4 Enforcement. Unless amended or cancelled as provided herein, this Agreement shall be enforceable by any party, notwithstanding a change in the San Jacinto General Plan or any master development plan, zoning, subdivision or building regulations adopted by CITY which alters or amends the rules, regulations or policies governing permitted uses of the Property, or the density, design, improvement and construction standards and specifications. 9.5 Project Is a Private Undertaking. Except as provided by law, the parties specifically understand and agree that the Project is a private development; that the CITY has no interest or responsibility for or duty to a third party concerning any improvements until such time and only until such time that CITY, by deed of dedication, accepts the Public Facilities pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement or in connection with the various subdivision map approvals; that OWNER shall have full power over and exclu- sive control of the Property subject only to the limitations and obligations of OWNER under this Agreement and enforcement of this Agreement by CITY. 9.6 Hold Harmless. OWNER agrees to and shall hold CITY, its officers, agents, employees and representatives harmless from liability for damages or claims for damages for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of OWNER or those of its contractors, subcontractors, agents, employees or other persons acting on its behalf which relate to the Project.- This section applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered or alleged to have been suffered by reason of the operation referred to in this section, regardless of whether CITY has prepared, supplied or approved plans or specifications (or both) for the Project. 9.7 Applicable Law; Attorneys' Fees. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In any arbitration, quasi- judicial or administrative proceedings or any action in any court of competent jurisdiction, brought by any party to enforce any covenant or any of such party's rights or reme- dies under this Agreement, including any action for declara- tory or equitable relief, the prevailing party shall be 132ag025pr 20 entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and all costs, expenses and disbursements in connection with such action, including the costs of reasonable investigation, preparation and professional or expert consultation, which sums may be included in any judgment or decree entered in such action in favor of the prevailing party. 9.8 Institution of Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may institute legal action to (a) cure, correct or remedy any default, to enforce any covenants or agreements herein or to enjoin any threatened or attempted violation thereof, (b) recover damages for any default, or (c) obtain any other remedies consistent with the purpose of this Agreement. Such legal actions must be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or in the Federal District Court of the Southern District of California. 9.9 Notices. All notices required or provided for under this Agreement shall be in writing and will be deemed to have been duly delivered upon personal delivery or as of the second business day after mailing by United States certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid and addressed as follows: If to CITY: If to OWNER: CITY OF SAN JACINTO 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, California 92383 Attention: Ross Nammar PR EQUITIES, LTD. 1655 E. Sixth Street Suite A4a Corona, California 91719 Attention: Steven R. Peacock A party may change the address by giving notice in writing to the other party and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. 9.10 Rules of Construction and Miscellaneous Terms. 9.10.1 Gender; Number. The singular includes the plural; the masculine gender includes the feminine and neuter; "shall" is mandatory, "may" is permissive. 9.10.2 Joint and Several Obligation. If a party to this Agreement consists of more than one person or entity, their obligations are joint and several. 132ag025pr 21 This Agreement has been executed by the parties at San Jacinto, California, on the day and year first above written. CITY: CITY OF SAN JACINTO, a municipal corporation By: Its: ATTEST: By: "42,42 Mayor Deputy City Clerk OWNER: PR EQUITIES, LTD., a California limited partnership By: The Peacock-Radaker Corporation, a California corporation, General Partner By: /4 Al 7i; Steven R. Peacock Press ent By: id L ' Cotting Vice President I hereby approve the form anq legality of the foregoing Agreement this day of C , 1989. CITY ATTORNEY 22 Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit EXHIBITS - Existing Development Approvals - Property - Resolution Approving Specific Plan - Public Facilities - Phased Implementation Schedules 23 EXHIBIT "A" EXISTING DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS (As of the Effective Date) City Code of the City of San Jacinto; Development and Building Standards of the City of San Jacinto; Development Plan; Specific Plans 1-88 and 2-88, and Conditions of Approval Thereof; General Plan as amended by City Resolution No. 1772; Tentative Tract Maps and Conditions of Approval Thereof; Final Tract Maps; Zoning; Easements; Condemnations; City Public Works Specifications; and City Ordinance No. 340. Exhibit "A" June 6, 2002 TO: FROM: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk` The Honorable Mayor and City Council Agenda No. 4, 5 4.5.1 4.5.2 SUBJECT: November 5, 2002 Election — Two Resolutions — 1) Calling the Election and to coordinate it with the Riverside County Registrar of Voters 2) Adopting Regulations for Candidates for Elective Office, pertaining to the costs of the electorate for the election to be held November 5, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: 1) Adopt Resolution No. _ / A Resolution of the City of San Jacinto, California, calling a General Municipal Election on November 5, 2002. 2) Adopt Resolution No._ / A Resolution of the City of San Jacinto, California, adopting regulations for the candidates for elective office, pertaining to the electorate and the costs thereof for the General Municipal Election to be held in the City of San Jacinto on Tuesday, November 5, 2002. BACKGROUND: When the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1087 on April 19, 2001 the General Municipal Election was changed from the odd numbered years to the even numbered years and consolidated the election to be held in conjunction with State and Presidential elections of the even numbered years. It was the intent that the elections would be coordinated with Riverside County Registrar of Voters. To accomplish this these two proposed resolutions must be adopted before every General Municipal Election. JUSTIFICATION: Both resolutions are required to coordinate the Municipal General Election with the Riverside County Registrar of Voters. Page 1 of 2 BUDGETARY IMPACT: The estimated cost to a candidate is $300.00. This money has to be deposited with the City and if there is Tess cost, the balance is refunded. If there is a shortage, the City Clerk will invoice the candidate. The estimated cost to coordinate the election is $26,000. Staff will have a more accurate number following the June 19, 2002 workshop hosted by the Registrar of Voters Mischelle Townsend. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A — Ordinance No. 1087 Agenda Item 4.5.1 Resolution No._ Agenda Item 4.5.2 Resolution No._ Page 2 of 2 r ORDINANCE NO. 1087 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO AUTHORIZE CONSOLIDATION WITH THE STATE-WIDE ELECTION IN NOVEMBER OF EACH EVEN -NUMBERED YEAR, AMENDING CHAPTER 1.16 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, Section 1301 of the Elections Code of the State of California permits the City of San Jacinto to change its election day with the approval of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Registrar of Voters proposal for a cooperative realignment of the election, the City of San Jacinto changed its election day from the date of the state-wide election in November of each even -numbered year, to the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each odd -numbered year; WHEREAS, the percentage of registered voters in the City of San Jacinto that turned out for the first odd -year municipal election held in November 1995 was 28%, dropping from a voter turnout of 75.5% in the previous municipal election consolidated with the Presidential election of 1992; WHEREAS, voter turnout in the City of San Jacinto for odd -numbered year municipal elections has remained extremely low at 30% in 1997 and 31.8% in 1999, and voter turnout for the Presidential Elections of 1996 and 2000 remains high at 64.2% and 71.32% respectively. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto recommends a return to a November even -year election cycle in order to assure the broadest representation of registered voters in the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendment to Section 1.16.010, When Held, of the San Jacinto Municipal Code. Section 1.16.010(A) of the City of San Jacinto Municipal Code is amended as follows: 1.16.010 When held. A. The city shall hold its general municipal election on the same day as the state-wide general election held on the first Tuesday following the first Monday in November of even -numbered years. Section 2. Amendment to Section 1.16.020, Effect on current office holders, of the San Jacinto Municipal Code. Section 1.16.020 of the City of San Jacinto Municipal Code is amended as follows: 1.16.020 Effect on current officeholders. Those elected city officers whose four-year terms of office would have, prior to the adoption of the ordinance codified in this chapter, expired following the election held on the first Tuesday following the first Monday in November of an odd -numbered year, shall instead continue in their offices until the election held on the first Tuesday following the first Monday in November of an even -numbered year. Section 3. Request to Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside to Authorize Consolidation with the November election of even -numbered years. Pursuant to Section 1301 of the California Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, is hereby requested to change the municipal election day of the City of San Jacinto from the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of odd -numbered years, to the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of even -number years; Section 4. Terms of Officeholders. Pursuant to Section 10403.5(b) of the California Elections Code, the terms of officeholders will be extended as necessary, but no longer than 12 months. Section 5. Notification to Registered Voters. Pursuant to Section 10403.5(e), the City Clerk will request the Registrar of Voters to mail a notice to all registered voters in the City within 30 days after the ordinance becomes operative, informing them of the change of election date and of the resulting change in terms of the current elected officeholders. Section 6. Operative Date. This Ordinance shall become operative following the approval of the Board of Supervisors of this change of election date. MOVED, PASSED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 19th day of April, 2001. Patrick A. Williams, Mayor ATTEST: Susan Matthew, CMC, City Clerk r r CERTIFICATE I, Susan Matthew, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 1087 was duly introduced on the 5th day of April, 2001, and adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of April, 2001, and that the same was adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN Ayres, Carlson-Buydos, Conner, Good, Williams None None None Susan Matthew, CMC City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) �G NDA 4. 5.1 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, CALLING A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 5, 2002 WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election will be held in the City of San Jacinto on the 5th day of November, 2002, for the full terms of four (4) years for two (2) Council Member seats; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto as follows: 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the Registrar of Voters to conduct the General Municipal Election on behalf of the City of San Jacinto. 2. The polls will be open from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on November 5, 2002. 3. The General Municipal Election will be held and conducted in all manners as prescribed by law. 4. The City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto will give notice of such Election by publication in the local newspaper. 5. The Riverside County Registrar of Voters is requested to canvass said election for the City of San Jacinto. 6. The City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Riverside County Registrar of Voters. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 2002. City of San Jacinto by James M. Conner, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE, PERTAINING TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS THEREOF FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2002. WHEREAS, Section 13307 of the California Elections Code provides that the governing body of any local agency may adopt regulations pertaining to materials prepared by any candidate for a municipal election, including costs thereof; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto as follows: Section 1: General Provisions Pursuant to Section 13307 of the California Elections Code, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at the General Municipal Election to be held in the City of San Jacinto on Tuesday, Novembe 5, 2002 may prepare a candidate's statement on any appropriate form provided by the City Clerk. Such statement may include the name, age, and occupation of the candidate, and a brief description of no more than 200 words of the candidate's eduction and qualifications as expressed by the candidate. Such statement will not include party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations. Such statement shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk at the time the candidate's nomination papers are filed. Except as provided in Section 13309 of the California Elections Code, such statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the period for filing nominations papers and until 5:00 p.m. of the next working day after the close of the nominating period. Section 2: Payment The Riverside County Elections Department shall give the City Clerk an estimate of the total cost of printing, handling, translating and mailing the candidate's statements filed pursuant to the Elections Code, and require each candidate filing a statement to pay I advance his or her pro rata share as a condition of having his or her statement included in the voter's pamphlet. As these costs are only estimated, the Cityi Clerk shall bill each candidate for any cost in excess of the deposit and shall refund any unused portion of any deposit. Section 3: Information The City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the candidate's representative a copy of this Resolution at the time the nominating petitions are issued. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 2002. City of San Jacinto by James M. Conner, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk Agenda No. 4.6 June 6, 2002 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk(" SUBJECT: Purchase of Optical Imaging Equipment and Supplies RECOMMENDATION: Approve $64, 843 for purchase of optical imaging software and hardware. $38,400 requested for continued software and hardware in fiscal year 2002/2003. BACKGROUND: Per the Purchasing Ordinance No. 1092 adopted in August 2001 the City Council must review specification for supplies and equipment over $25,000. In the 2001/2002 Fiscal Year the City Council recognized the lack of attention the City's Record Management System received and budgeted to begin the optical imaging process as part of an aggressive records retention program. With the change in City Clerks during 2001 the process did not get underway, as early as anticipated. Staff was able to purchase a used portion of the necessary system at nearly half the cost of new and subsequently used the savings to improve the quality of the hardware being purchased. Scott Tantlinger, Business Systems Analyst, (our main contact from Riverside County for the connectivity project) and the City Clerk visited the City of Palm Springs. Palm Springs has been using the system for nearly three years. Both Mr. Tantlinger and Clerk Chouinard were impressed with the system for different reasons based on their individual expertise. JUSTIFICATION: The proposed optical imaging system begins the records retention program. The goal is to get the City Clerk's records on the system and then begin to expand to The information for the 2002/2003 Fiscal Year is to continue the improvements and make the records, as they get into the system, available to the public via the World Wide Web (Internet). BUGETARY IMPACT: The City Council authorized and budgeted $75,466 for Capital Outlay for the City Clerk's record retention system and upgrades of the laptop computer. The total spent is going to be under budget by approximately $2,000. ATTACHMENTS: Quotations for 2002 and 2003. Letter from Riverside County Business Systems Analyst QUOTATION PREPARED FOR CITY OF SAN JACINTO 5-2-02 Year 2002 Software: • OTG ApplicationXtender w/5 Concurrent Users $12,587 • OTG DiskXtender 5,699 • OTG Full Text Server 2,849 • OTG Full Text Clients, 5 @ $ ] 89 845 • OTG OCR Network 1,899 Sub Total $23,879 Hardware: • Database & Jukebox Server $11,409 Dell PowerEdge 4600, 1.8GHz, 512MB RAM, 2 X 36GB SCSI HD Mirrored (Operating System), Additional 4 X 36GB Raid (Data & Image Storage) Ethernet Card, Adaptic SCSI Card, 15" Monitor, etc., PowerVault 110, 40/80 Tape Drive, Microsoft Windows 2000 Server, Microsoft SQL Server 2000 w/5 User License, 3yr. On -Site Service. • Full Text Server $ 6,619 Dell PowerEdge 2500, 1.4GHz, 1 GB RAM, 36GB SCSI HD (Operating System), Additional 36GB SCSI HD, Ethernet Card, Adaptec SCSI Card, 15" Monitor, etc., Microsoft Windows 2000 Server w/5 User License, 3yr. On -Site Service. • Scanner Workstation Customer Pentium 400MHZ, 64MB RAM, 9GB HD, 17" or 20" Monitor, etc., (Minimum Recommendation) • Existing I-IPIV/HPV Laser Printer Connection or Canon Image Customer Runner Multi Function Copiers • Canon DR5020, Duplex, 75/150 PPM, 11" X 17" Scanner 5,720 Sub Total $23,748 Total Software $23,879 Total Hardware $23,748 Sales Tax $ 3,691 Installation & Training $ 4,300 Annual OTG Software Maintenance $ 4,800 On -Site System Support (2 hrs/mo) $ 1,250 Canon Scanner Maintenance $ 675 • This Quotation Is Firm For Sixty Days, After Which Prices Are Subject To Change. LEASE OPTIONS: • 60 Month, 0 Down, $ 1.00 Purchase Option, Monthly Payment = $1,183.94 Plus Tax • 48 Month, 0 Down, $1.00 Purchase Option, Monthly Payment = $1,407.22 Plus Tax ITEMS COVERED IN LEASE: • Software $23,879 • Hardware 23,748 • Installation & Training 4.300 Total $51,927 OPTIONS: • DR5060F • OTG ERMXtender $13,995 $12,000 QUOTATION PREPARED FOR CITY OF SAN JACINTO 5-2-02 Year 2003 Software: • OTG Application/WebXtender w/10 Concurrent Users $20,900 • OTG ScanXtender 495 Sub Total $21,395 Hardware: • Scanner Workstation Customer Pentium 400MHZ, 64MB RAM, 9GB HD, 17" or 20" Monitor, etc., (Minimum Recommendation) • Existing HPIV/HPV Laser Printer Connection or Canon Image Customer Runner Multi Function Copiers • Add 512MB RAM To Jukebox Server Customer • Canon DR3060, Duplex, 40/80 PPM, 8'/2" X 14" Scanner 3,459 Sub Total $ 3,459 Total Software $21,395 Total Hardware $ 3,459 Sales Tax $ 1,926 Installation & Training $ 2,500 Annual OTG Software Maintenance $ 4,180 On -Site System Support (2 hrs/mo) $ 2,000 Canon Scanner Maintenance $ 500 • This Quotation Is Firm For Sixty Days, After Which Prices Are Subject To Change. Information Technology x:909-955-3679 May 17 7:16 P.02 Dorothy Chouinard City Clerk City of San Jacinto 201 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 Dorothy, I've reviewed the quotation for the OTG Software based imaging system from Canon Business Solutions. The equipment listed within the quote will integrate with the network solution being installed for the City of San Jacinto and should function well in supporting the imaging application. Dell is one of the "Tier 1" computer companies and with the 3 year on -site support included, this equipment is well built and well supported. The only addition 1 would like to see made would be a line item amount for $500 for rack -mounting the two servers. In reference to the customer supplied Scanner Workstation, I have listed budgetary estimates for one Hewlett-Packard workstation and monitor below. HP PC Vectra VL420 P4 1.9 512mb RAM 80 GB HD CDRW $1,200 HP L1720 171N LCD MM MONITOR $ 700 Respectfully, Scott Tdtitlinger Business Systems Analyst County of R.iveLS1Le AGENDA ITEM 5.1 June 06, 2002 AGE TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Bemard Simon — Finance Director SUBJECT: Approve Warrant Register for Warrants, Prepaid Checks, and Payroll Checks RECOMMENDATION By motion, approve the warrant register for the warrants and prepaid items and payroll checks issued since the last Council meeting, for the period ending June 06, 2002 BACKGROUND The following are the warrant and check numbers for this cycle: Warrant/Prepaid #'s Cycle Dates Payroll Checks Cycle Date 60659-60825 June 06,2002 14615-14668 June 06,2002 Payroll information is available for Council review in the Finance Department. JUSTIFICATION All warrants, pre -paid checks and payroll checks require Council approval. BUDGETARY IMPACT Adequate funds have been budgeted to cover the subject expenses. ATTACHMENTS 1 — Detailed listing of invoices paid and warrant register. WARRANT REGISTER (Accounts Payable Check Register by Bank Number) PREPARED05/23/2002, 15:30:23 PROGF GM346L City San Jacinto BANK uu Bank of Hemet ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PET 1 2002/11 REPORT ...EMBER 48 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 60673 830 CALPERS 006266 05/23/2002 085-0000-202.21-28 7,528.76 7,528.76 * 7,528.76 60674 2904 CINDY BOHN 006254 05/23/2002 010-1400-414.31-20 150.00 150.00 * 150.00 60675 3078 HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE C 006261 05/23/2002 085-0000-202.21-29 3,784.24 3,784.24 * 3,784.24 60676 607 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 006260 05/23/2002 085-0000-202.21-29 675.95 675.95 * 675.95 60677 691 LINCOLN FINANCIAL GROUP 006259 05/23/2002 085-0000-202.21-29 1,488.08 1,488.08 * 1,488.08 60678 3056 MICHELLE HOLMES 006255 05/23/2002 010-1400-414.31-20 150.00 150.00 * 150.00 60679 2462 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 006256 05/23/2002 085-0000-202.21-39 26,705.00 006257 05/23/2002 085-0000-202.21-40 2,108.68 006258 05/23/2002 065-0000-201.08-64 625.11 29,438.79 * 29,438.79 60680 2783 PRE -PAID LE(AT, SERVICES, 006262 05/23/2002 085-0000-202.21-87 239.32 239.32 * 239.32 60681 912 S.J. POLICE ASSOCIATION 006265 05/23/2002 085-0000-202.21-42 1,485.00 1,485.00 * 1,485.00 60682 828 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNA 006264 05/23/2002 085-0000-202.21-43 328.40 328.40 * 328.40 60683 947 SMITH SYSTEMS 006253 05/23/2002 010-1210-412.40-45 240.00 240.00 * 240.00 60684 447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 006267 05/23/2002 050-9000-450.35-40 13,035.59 13,035.59 * 13,035.59 60685 420 STAPLES 006252 05/23/2002 010-1210-412.40-45 915.77 915.77 * 915.77 60686 377 UNITED WAY OF HEMET 006263 05/23/2002 085-0000-202.21-80 142.38 142.38 * 142.38 60687 526 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 006268 05/23/2002 010-2500-425.35-60 3,112.98 3,112.98 * 3,112.98 BANK/CHECK TOTAL 62,715.26 62,715.26 ALL BANKS/CHECKS TOTAL 62,715.26 62,715.26 i PREPARED05/29/2002, 15:56:38 PROGRAM: GM346L City of San Jacinto BANK 00 Bank of Hemet ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2002/12 REPORT NUMBER 49 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 60659* 947 GATEWAY 006104 05/13/2002 074-0000-103.12-25 2,604.00 006455 05/13/2002 074-0000-103.12-25 2,604.00 5,208.00 * 5,208.00 60660* 947 PESTICIDE APPLICATORS PRO 006454 05/15/2002 021-4150-410.31-20 55.00 55.00 * 55.00 60661* 447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 006453 05/15/2002 050-9000-450.35-40 26,790.08 26,790.08 * 26,790.08 60662* 795 ARCH WIRELESS 006449 05/15/2002 010-3100-431.35-16 59.05 006450 05/15/2002 021-4150-410.35-16 21.00 006451 05/15/2002 050-9000-450.35-16 41.53 121.58 * 121.58 60663* 526 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 006452 05/15/2002 010-2500-425.35-60 533.09 533.09 * 533.09 60664* 2984 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 006435 05/15/2002 010-1200-412.35-17 194.24 006436 05/28/2002 010-1700-417.35-17 68.67 006437 05/15/2002 010-1400-414.35-17 68.67 006438 05/15/2002 010-1700-417.35-17 68.67 006439 05/15/2002 099-9700-470.35-17 68.67 006440 05/15/2002 010-1700-417.35-17 78.71 006441 05/15/2002 021-4150-410.35-16 71.05 006442 05/15/2002 025-7252-410.35-16 68.67 006443 05/15/2002 021-4150-410.35-16 43.71 006444 05/15/2002 010-1400-414.35-17 43.71 006445 05/15/2002 010-1700-417.35-17 68.66 006446 05/15/2002 025-7252-410.35-16 43.70 006447 05/15/2002 050-9000-450.35-16 73.70 006448 05/15/2002 050-9000-450.35-16 78.70 006456 05/15/2002 010-1110-411.35-17 36.74 006499 05/15/2002 010-1110-411.35-17 127.48 1,203.75 * 1,135.08 60665* 2688 PLATINIUM PLUS FOR BUSINE 006429 05/15/2002 010-1200-412.36-25 58.65 006430 05/15/2002 010-1410-414.21-10 48.25 006431 05/15/2002 010-2500-425.21-10 191.16 006432 05/15/2002 010-2500-425.40-04 273.15 006433 05/15/2002 010-2500-425.40-04 279.75 006434 05/15/2002 050-1400-414.21-10 90.72 941.68 * 941.68 60666* 259 CURTIS CURTISS 006428 05/16/2002 010-3100-431.31-20 372.00 372.00 * 372.00 60667* 1037 KEN SOUTHERN 006427 05/16/2002 010-3100-431.31-20 372.00 372.00 * 372.00 PREPARED05/29/2002, 15:56:38 PROGRAM: GM346L City of San Jacinto BANK 00 Bank of Hemet ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2002/12 REPORT NUMBER 49 CHECK VENDOR NO NO VENDOR NAME VOUCHER P.O. DATE NO NO ACCOUNT REMITTANCE AMOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) CHECK TOTAL 60668* 2701 C R & R INCORPORATED 006426 60669* 947 HECTOR BEAZA 006425 60670* 329 WATER EDUCATION FOUNDATIO 006424 60690 947 ACAPULCO MEXIMN RESTAURA 006105 60691 2925 ADAIR OFFICE 'FURNITURE 006106 006352 60692 931 AL'S KUBOTA TRACTOR LAWNM 006107 60693 981 ALERT BARRICADE, INC. 006403 60694 947 ALL AMERICAN SEWER TOOLS 006272 60695 947 ALL AMERICAN SEWER TOOLS 006273 60696 2720 ALL AMERICAN SEWER TOOLS 006108 60697 997 ANADY'S TROPHIES 006109 006238 006313 60698 2795 ANDRE LANDSCAPING SERVICE 006110 006111 006112 006113 60699 952 ARROW PRINTING 006236 006237 006483 60700 2710 ASPHALT & CONCRETE RECYCL 006290 006291 05/21/2002 05/21/2002 05/21/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 059-8052-450.34-05 050-9000-450.31-20 050-9000-450.31-20 050-0000-308.09-10 050-1400-414.21-10 010-1400-414.40-45 025-7250-410.33-30 055-4170-450.21-35 055-4170-450.21-80 055-4170-450.33-30 055-4170-450.33-30 010-1700-417.21-10 010-3100-431.21-10 010-1100-411.21-10 025-7100-410.34-05 025-7250-410.34-05 025-7251-410.34-05 025-7252-410.34-05 010-1700-417.21-10 010-1110-411.21-10 010-1700-417.21-10 021-4150-410.33-30 021-4150-410.33-30 112,442.95 112,442.95 * 60.00 60.00 * 115.00 115.00 * 56.93 56.93 * 59.27 601.79 661.06 * 32.35 32.35 * 385.21 385.21 200.00 200.00 * 1,048.71 1,048.71 * 57.44 57.44 * 8.08 73.27 16.70 98.05 * 4,155.41 5,194.26 2,077.71 14,543.94 25,971.32 * 297.39 241.36 198.26 737.01 * 10.00 25.00 35.00 * 112,442.95 60.00 115.00 56.93 661.06 32.35 385.21 200.00 1,048.71 57.44 98.05 25,971.32 737.01 35.00 3 PREP1RED05/29/2002, 15:56:38 PROGRAM: GM346L City of San Jacinto BANK 00 Bank of Hemet ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 3 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2002/12 REPORT NUMBER 49 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 60701 992 AT & T 006269 006270 006271 006363 60702 985 B & W PIPE & SUPPLY 006114 006365 006366 006367 006368 006404 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 60703 2216 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 006307 06/06/2002 006308 06/06/2002 60704 2049 BESTLINE MATERIALS INC. 006115 006314 006315 006360 006361 006362 006364 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 60705 2701 C R & R INCORPORATED 006321 06/06/2002 006322 06/06/2002 60706 242 C.E.D. 006116 006117 006124 006318 006319 006320 006405 60707 216 CAR WASH DEPOT 006422 006423 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 60708 2802 CARLOS AYALDE 006316 06/06/2002 006317 06/06/2002 60709 2455 CENTRAL COUNTY UNITED WAY 006275 006495 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 025-7252-410.35-16 025-7252-410.35-16 025-7252-410.35-16 050-9000-450.35-16 025-7250-410.33-30 025-7250-410.33-30 025-7250-410.33-30 025-7251-410.33-30 025-7251-410.33-30 025-7252-410.33-30 010-1111-411.30-90 096-1111-411.30-90 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 021-4150-410.33-30 021-4150-410.33-30 021-4150-410.33-30 021-4150-410.33-30 021-4150-410.33-30 056-4150-450.35-18 021-4150-410.33-30 025-7100-410.33-30 025-7252-410.33-30 025-7250-410.33-30 021-4150-410.33-30 021-4150-410.33-30 021-4150-410.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 010-3100-431.33-50 010-3300-431.33-50 065-0000-103.12-07 065-0000-103.12-07 16.42 16.44 15.80 22.15 70.81 * 86.20 87.99 172.04 118.63 7.55 403.08 875.49 * 16,235.00 3,670.57 19,905.57 4.09 4.30 17.10 314.78 71.60 .85 21.35- 391.37 * 900.60 76.50 977.10 * 51.24 401.71 4.46 48.54 37.24 47.70 28.96 619.85 70.50 4.50 75.00 * 308.64 831.95 1,140.59 * 025-7100-410.34-05 540.00 029-8660-410.30-10 305.62 70.81 875.49 19,905.57 391.37 977.10 619.85 75.00 1,140.59 4 PREPARED05/29/2002, 15:56:38 PROGRAM: GM346L City of San Jacinto BANK 00 Bank of Hemet ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 4 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2002/12 REPORT NUMBER 49 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 60709 2455 CENTRAL COUNTY UNITED WAY 845.62 * 845.62 60710 947 CHACON FARMS 006118 06/06/2002 050-0000-308.09-10 7.58 7.58 * 7.58 60711 227 CHEVRON 006239 06/06/2002 010-3100-431.21-70 17.40 17.40 * 17.40 60712 947 CLARK, DAVID 006119 06/06/2002 050-0000-308.09-10 10.04 10.04 * 10.04 60713 2464 COMSERCO 006121 06/06/2002 050-9000-450.34-05 86.10 006312 06/06/2002 060-3100-431.40-45 5,987.81 6,073.91 * 6,073.91 60714 250 COTTON/BRIDGES/ASSOCIATIO 006484 06/06/2002 096-1700-417.30-90 18,994.10 18,994.10 * 18,994.10 60715 2911 COTTONWOOD GROWERS 006274 06/06/2002 025-7100-410.33-10 258.60 258.60 * 258.60 60716 877 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 006206 06/06/2002 010-0000-304.03-35 198.00 006458 06/06/2002 010-0000-304.03-35 184.00 382.00 * 382.00 60717 947 CUBAN CAFE 006122 06/06/2002 050-0000-229.08-70 91.24 91.24 * 91.24 60718 947 CUNNINGHAM, ANTHONY 006123 06/06/2002 050-0000-229.08-70 14.94 14.94 * 14.94 60719 947 DAVID COTTON 006211 06/06/2002 050-0000-229.08-70 88.49 88.49 * 88.49 60720 3021 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 006406 06/06/2002 065-0000-201.08-73 20.00 20.00 * 20.00 60721 3058 DEWEY SERVICES,INC. 006125 06/06/2002 010-2500-425.34-05 70.00 70.00 * 70.00 60722 3057 DIAMONDBACK FIRE AND RESC 006401 06/06/2002 010-3200-431.40-45 9,954.61 9,954.61 * 9,954.61 60723 1671 DIANE HARDING 006459 06/06/2002 010-3100-431.21-10 191.01 191.01 * 191.01 60724 947 DIEDERICH, DREW 006218 06/06/2002 050-0000-229.08-70 3.79 3.79 * 3.79 60725 949 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC. 006131 06/06/2002 050-9000-450.33-30 28.00 S PREPARED05/29/2002, 15:56:38 PROGRAM: GM346L City of San Jacinto BANK 00 Bank of Hemet ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 5 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2002/12 REPORT NUMBER 49 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 60725 949 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC. 006132 006323 006324 006325 006369 006370 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 60726 460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST. 006126 06/06/2002 025-7250-410.35-10 006127 06/06/2002 025-7250-410.35-10 006276 06/06/2002 025-7250-410.35-10 006277 06/06/2002 025-7250-410.35-10 006278 06/06/2002 025-7250-410.35-10 006279 06/06/2002 025-7250-410.35-10 006280 06/06/2002 025-7100-410.35-10 006281 06/06/2002 025-7250-410.35-10 006371 06/06/2002 025-7251-410.35-10 006372 06/06/2002 025-7250-410.35-10 006373 06/06/2002 025-7250-410.35-10 006374 06/06/2002 025-7250-410.35-10 006375 06/06/2002 025-7250-410.35-10 006376 06/06/2002 025-7250-410.35-10 006377 06/06/2002 025-7250-410.35-10 006378 06/06/2002 025-7250-410.35-10 006379 06/06/2002 025-7250-410.35-10 006407 06/06/2002 025-7250-410.35-10 006408 06/06/2002 025-7250-410.35-10 006409 06/06/2002 025-7250-410.35-10 006410 06/06/2002 025-7100-410.35-10 60728 947 ECKBURG, JEREMY & FAITH 006130 06/06/2002 050-0000-229.08-70 60729 947 ELITE FIRE PROTECTON 006240 06/06/2002 010-2500-425.34-05 60730 476 ESGIL CORPORATION 006411 06/06/2002 010-3300-431.30-90 60731 947 ESTATE AT RANCHO SAN JACI 006128 06/06/2002 050-0000-229.08-70 60732 483 EVANS TIRE CO. 006129 06/06/2002 050-0000-229.08-70 006326 06/06/2002 021-4150-410.33-50 60733 2946 EXCEL STEAM 006296 06/06/2002 010-3100-431.34-05 48.00 56.00 48.00 12.00 56.00 60.00 308.00 * 308.00 54.70 8.32 14.53 6.80 11.09 5.94 326.82 39.83 1,217.34 9.51 815.25 6.34 6.34 9.50 25.56 951.39 36.71 1,567.18 283.37 158.31 6.34 5,561.17 * 19.28 19.28 * 55.00 55.00 * 354.38 354.38 * 50.00 50.00 * 60.45 55.00 115.45 * 625.00 625.00 * 5,561.17 19.28 55.00 354.38 50.00 115.45 625.00 PREPARED05/29/2002, 15:56:38 PROGRAM: GM346L City of San Jacinto BANK 00 Bank of Hemet ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 6 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2002/12 REPORT NUMBER 49 CHECK VENDOR NO NO VENDOR NAME VOUCHER P.O. DATE NO NO ACCOUNT REMITTANCE AMOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) CHECK TOTAL 60734 2744 FAMILY SPORT & FITNESS 60736 484 FEDERAL EXPRESS 60737 947 FIGUEROA, ANGEL 60738 2107 FLEET SERVICES 60739 60740 60741 60742 947 FORCAST HOMES 3081 GERARD DESIGN 006135 006136 006137 006138 006139 006140 006141 006142 006143 006144 006145 006146 006147 006148 006149 006150 006380 006485 006134 006475 006476 006477 006478 006479 006480 006481 006482 006133 006151 515 GFB-FRIEDRICH & ASSOC., I 006152 006153 006469 006470 947 HAMPTON, JOE 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 010-1110-411.11-10 010-1200-412.11-10 010-1400-414.11-10 010-1700-417.11-10 010-3100-431.11-10 010-3100-431.11-10 010-3300-431.11-10 010-7400-425.11-10 021-4150-410.11-10 025-7250-410.11-10 050-1400-414.11-10 050-9000-450.11-10 055-4170-450.11-10 096-1200-412.11-10 096-1700-417.11-10 099-1700-417.11-10 010-2500-425.30-90 096-1700-417.21-10 050-0000-308.09-10 010-1200-412.33-50 010-1400-414.21-10 024-3100-432.21-70 010-3300-431.21-70 021-4150-410.21-70 025-7100-410.21-70 050-9000-450.21-70 099-9700-470.21-10 050-0000-308.09-10 096-1700-417.30-90 026-7501-410.30-92 025-1400-414.30-90 025-1400-414.30-90 026-7501-410.30-92 006158 06/06/2002 050-0000-308.09-10 20.00 10.00 40.00 10.00 330.00 100.00 30.00 10.00 80.00 10.00 10.00 80.00 10.00 10.00 30.00 10.00 790.00 * 33.29 20.83 54.12 * 40.46 40.46 * 88.74 52.19 2,440.97 48.93 381.78 275.02 683.37 77.30 4,048.30 * 163.05 163.05 * 204.72 204.72 * 1,277.47 4,494.43 4,605.80 1,242.50 11,620.20 * 790.00 54.12 40.46 4,048.30 163.05 204.72 11,620.20 83.42 83.42 * 83.42 PREPARED05/29/2002, 15:56:38 PROGRAM: GM346L City of San Jacinto BANK 00 Bank of Hemet ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 7 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2002/12 REPORT NUMBER 49 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 60743 942 HDL COREN & CONE 006471 06/06/2002 010-2500-425.30-90 60744 1584 HEMET EMERGENCY MED*GROUP 006242 06/06/2002 010-3100-431.30-17 006243 06/06/2002 010-3100-431.30-17 006294 06/06/2002 010-3100-431.30-17 006295 06/06/2002 010-3100-431.30-17 60745 947 HEMET FEDERAL BANK 006157 06/06/2002 050-0000-229.08-70 60746 564 HEMET INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 006159 06/06/2002 055-4170-450.33-30 006162 06/06/2002 050-9000-450.33-30 60747 299 HEMET RUBBER STAMP 006241 06/06/2002 010-1700-417.21-10 006328 06/06/2002 010-2500-425.21-10 006329 06/06/2002 010-2500-425.21-10 60748 582 HEMET VALLEY PIPE & SUPPL 006412 06/06/2002 025-7100-410.33-10 60749 583 HEMET VALLEY TOOL & SUPPL 006282 06/06/2002 055-4170-450.33-30 006292 06/06/2002 021-4150-410.33-30 60750 947 HICKS, GLORIA 006161 06/06/2002 050-0000-229.08-70 60751 2833 HIGGINS, HARRIS-SHERMAN & 006309 06/06/2002 020-2200-419.30-90 006310 06/06/2002 020-2200-419.30-90 60752 2641 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICE 006154 06/06/2002 050-9000-450.33-10 006160 06/06/2002 050-9000-450.33-30 006327 06/06/2002 021-4150-410.33-30 60753 600 HUBBS STATIONERY 006163 06/06/2002 010-1700-417.21-10 006413 06/06/2002 050-1400-414.21-10 60754 616 INLAND FOUNDATION ENG. IN 006381 06/06/2002 022-4150-410.40-01 60755 631 J & J AUTOMOTIVE 006164 06/06/2002 055-4170-450.33-50 006165 06/06/2002 025-7100-410.33-50 006283 06/06/2002 021-4150-410.33-50 2,700.00 2,700.00 * 2,700.00 157.00 157.00 78.00 128.00 520.00 * 520.00 24.80 24.80 * 24.80 64.24 7.46 71.70 * 71.70 16.00 27.91 20.45 64.36 * 64.36 68.81 68.81 * 68.81 10.78 12.93 23.71 * 23.71 9.54 9.54 * 9.54 747.99 2,156.92 2,904.91 * 2,904.91 12.25 360.73 86.06 459.04 * 459.04 18.32 441.02 459.34 * 459.34 964.00 964.00 * 964.00 11.62 47.71 142.56 PREPARED05/29/2002, 15:56:38 PROGRAM: GM346L City of San Jacinto BANK 00 Bank of Hemet ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 8 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2002/12 REPORT NUMBER 49 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 60755 631 J & J AUTOMOTIVE 006330 06/06/2002 021-4150-410.33-50 10.00 006414 06/06/2002 025-7100-410.33-50 322.24 534.13 * 534.13 60756 3096 J.C. CONSTRUCTION AND REP 006358 06/06/2002 010-2500-425.40-01 5,980.00 5,980.00 * 5,980.00 60757 947 J.G. TUCKER & SON, INC. 006382 06/06/2002 050-9000-450.33-30 402.51 402.51 * 402.51 60758 947 JACKIE BURNEY 006203 06/06/2002 050-0000-229.08-70 217.57 217.57 * 217.57 60759 947 JENNINGS, CARL 006166 06/06/2002 050-0000-229.08-70 61.29 61.29 * 61.29 60760 2908 LA CHEMCIAL 006167 06/06/2002 050-9000-450.33-30 406.76 006170 06/06/2002 050-9000-450.33-30 1,707.98 006383 06/06/2002 050-9000-450.33-30 1,810.88 3,925.62 * 3,925.62 60761 2760 LANCASTER CONTRACT SURVEY 006168 06/06/2002 096-1700-417.30-90 500.00 500.00 * 500.00 60762 2800 LANCASTER INSPECTION SERV 006353 06/06/2002 010-3300-431.10-04 2,040.00 2,040.00 * 2,040.00 60763 947 LARSON, FRANCIS 006169 06/06/2002 050-0000-229.08-70 6.51 6.51 * 6.51 60764 947 LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM WH 006311 06/06/2002 020-2200-419.30-90 360.75 360.75 * 360.75 60765 618 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. 006244 06/06/2002 010-3100-431.21-35 150.85 006245 06/06/2002 010-3100-431.21-35 43.10 193.95 * 193.95 60766 710 MARDEN-SUSCO 006175 06/06/2002 050-9000-450.33-30 740.24 740.24 * 740.24 60767 2593 MARK ISRAEL 006221 06/06/2002 010-2500-425.30-90 934.66 934.66 * 934.66 60768 3107 MARY LANIER 006486 06/06/2002 096-1700-417.21-10 49.00 006487 06/06/2002 010-1700-417.31-15 113.57 162.57 * 162.57 60769 719 MATT CHLOR INC. 006331 06/06/2002 050-9000-450.33-30 594.02 594.02 * 594.02 PREPAREDO5/29/2002, 15:56:38 PROGRAM: GM346L City of San Jacinto BANK 00 Hank of Hemet ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 9 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2002/12 REPORT NUMBER 49 CHECK VENDOR NO NO VENDOR NAME VOUCHER P.O. DATE NO NO ACCOUNT REMITTANCE AMOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) CHECK TOTAL 60770 3111 MAXIMUS 006402 60771 1080 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS 006359 60772 732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES, 006171 006172 006173 006284 006332 006333 006334 006335 006336 006337 006384 006385 006386 006387 006460 006490 60774 947 MUNGUTA, ADRIANA 60775 767 NIXON-EGLI EQUIPMENT 006174 006176 006388 60776 947 NORMAN, LARRY 006338 60777 963 PACIFIC ALARM SVC., INC. 006186 006187 006188 006246 60778 1001 PIERCE PLUMBING 006177 006178 006179 006180 006181 006339 006340 006341 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 010-2500-425.30-90 010-2500-425.35-16 025-7100-410.21-35 021-4150-410.21-35 021-4150-410.21-35 025-7100-410.21-35 021-4150-410.21-35 021-4150-410.21-35 055-4170-450.21-35 050-9000-450.21-35 050-9000-450.21-35 055-4170-450.21-35 021-4150-410.21-35 021-4150-410.21-35 050-9000-450.21-35 055-4170-450.21-35 025-7100-410.21-35 010-7400-425.34-05 050-0000-229.08-70 021-4150-410.33-50 021-4150-410.33-50 059-0000-308.08-68 010-2500-425.33-10 010-2500-425.33-10 050-9000-450.34-05 010-3100-431.21-19 050-9000-450.21-80 050-9000-450.21-80 025-7100-410.33-30 025-7100-410.33-30 055-4170-450.21-80 021-4150-410.33-30 021-4150-410.33-30 021-4150-410.33-30 416.00 416.00 12.87 12.87 15.35 37.74 5.83 15.35 5.83 38.53 28.69 28.69 28.42 28.43 5.83 38.00 28.56 28.51 15.35 16.96 366.07 * 3.41 * 91.35 4,980.87 5,072.22 * 91.24 * 3.41 91.24 187.00 87.00 223.50 26.00 523.50 * 416.00 12.87 366.07 3.41 5,072.22 91.24 523.50 34.25 68.54 6.57 36.86 17.39 35.73 6.55 18.33 224.22 * 224.22 /0 PREPARED05/29/2002, 15:56:38 PROGRAM: GM346L City of San Jacinto BANK 00 Bank of Hemet ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 10 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2002/12 REPORT NUMBER 49 CHECK NO VENDOR NO VENDOR NAME VOUCHER P.O. DATE NO NO ACCOUNT REMITTANCE AMOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) CHECK TOTAL 60779 2480 PIP PRINTING 60780 947 PIROTS AUTOMOTIVE 60781 2606 PRESS ENTERPRISE 60782 597 QUALITY AUTO PARTS 60784 60785 60786 60787 60788 60789 837 QUAST TREE SERVICE 3095 R.J. NOBLE COMPANY 947 RAMONA EXPRESS RV 947 RAMONA EXPRSS RV 3061 REGENCY LIGHTING 2405 RELIABLE 006233 006234 006235 006185 006189 006491 006182 006183 006184 006389 006390 006391 006392 006393 006394 006395 006396 006397 006398 006415 006416 006417 006418 006342 006190 006191 006474 006193 006192 006194 006343 006355 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 010-2500-425.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 050-0000-229.08-70 010-1700-417.36-25 010-2500-425.21-10 055-4170-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-50 055-4170-450.33-50 021-4150-410.33-50 021-4150-410.33-50 021-4150-410.33-50 021-4150-410.33-50 021-4150-410.33-50 021-4150-410.33-50 021-4150-410.33-50 021-4150-410.33-50 021-4150-410.33-50 021-4150-410.33-50 056-4150-450.33-30 056-4150-450.33-30 056-4150-450.33-30 056-4150-450.33-30 021-4150-410.33-30 050-0000-229.08-70 050-0000-308.09-10 022-4150-410.40-01 050-0000-308.09-10 050-0000-229.08-70 025-7260-410.21-30 025-7260-410.21-30 010-1110-411.21-10 251.70 490.73 747.68 1,490.11 117.36 117.36 234.24 143.02 377.26 16.15 2.14 6.54 8.91 2.14 2.78 5.38 12.55 43.05 3.85 66.44 1.14 8.57 32.70 8.61 3.22 5.80 229.97 575.00 575.00 450.00 76.44 279,174.50 279,700.94 13.48 13.48 100.00 100.00 311.35 160.55 471.90 15.57 1,490.11 117.36 377.26 229.97 575.00 279,700.94 13.48 100.00 471.90 1/ PREPARED05/29/2002, 15:56:38 PROGRAM: GM346L City of San Jacinto BANK 00 Bank of Hemet ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 11 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2002/12 REPORT NUMBER 49 CHECK VENDOR NO NO VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE NAME NO NO ACCOUNT REMITTANCE AMOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) CHECK TOTAL 60789 2405 RELIABLE 006356 006357 60790 2633 RETIRED PLUMBER & SON 006461 60791 3119 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEP 006473 60792 3071 ROGERS,ANDERSON,MALODY & 006195 006493 60793 947 ROSEMARY ARAIZA 006201 60794 947 SAN JACINTO POLICE ACTIVI 006494 60795 916 SAN JACINTO UNIFIED SCHOO 006199 006200 60796 958 SAWMILL GRAPHICS 006208 60797 60798 822 SHARPS ACE HARDWARE 006204 006205 006420 947 SIGALA, ROBERT 006197 60799 428 SOUTH COAST A.Q.M.D. 006399 006400 60800 2759 SOUTH KERN MACHINERY 006198 006231 006345 006419 60801 420 STAPLES 006207 006222 006247 006248 006249 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 010-1110-411.21-10 010-1210-412.21-10 010-2500-425.33-10 065-0000-201.20-82 010-1400-414.10-04 010-1400-414.10-04 050-0000-229.08-70 029-8660-410.30-12 021-4150-410.21-70 050-9000-450.21-70 010-1100-411.36-10 021-4150-410.33-30 050-9000-450.33-10 050-9000-450.33-30 050-0000-308.09-10 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 021-4150-410.33-50 021-4150-410.33-50 021-4150-410.33-50 021-4150-410.33-50 050-1400-414.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 010-1700-417.21-10 010-1700-417.21-10 010-3100-431.21-10 146.39 9.57 171.53 * 160.00 160.00 7,221.08 7,221.08 * 4,900.00 4,200.00 9,100.00 * 18.03 18.03 * 2,238.97 2,238.97 * 1,347.47 32.48 1,379.95 * 1,363.04 1,363.04 * 83.87 24.05 13.76 121.68 * 44.32 44.32 * 195.89 75.00 270.89 * 33.82 44.03 394.69 29.22 501.76 88.23 75.12 94.65 10.09- 381.25 171.53 160.00 7,221.08 9,100.00 18.03 2,238.97 1,379.95 1,363.04 121.68 44.32 270.8_ 501.76 a PREPARED05/29/2002, 15:56:38 PROGRAM: GM346L City of San Jacinto BANK 00 Bank of Hemet ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 12 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2002/12 REPORT NUMBER 49 CHECK VENDOR NO NO VENDOR NAME VOUCHER P.O. DATE NO NO ACCOUNT REMITTANCE AMOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) CHECK TOTAL 60801 420 STAPLES 006250 006285 006286 006287 006288 006348 006349 006350 006472 60803 947 STEELWELD OF CALIFORNIA 006196 60804 947 STESTON ENGINEERS 006202 60805 2140 STETSON PHOTO 006462 60806 2406 STRATTONS JANITORIAL SERV 006489 006492 60807 2898 SUBBARAYAN KRISHNAN, M.D. 006293 60808 2393 SUNRISE AIR CONDITIONING 006496 006497 006498 60809 60810 60811 60812 60813 2130 SUPERIOR READY MIX CONCRE 006344 947 TAYLOR, TOMMY 947 TERRACINA APARTMENTS 2884 TMT PATHWAY L.L.C. 006209 006210 006232 960 TRI-LAKE CONSULTANTS, INC 006464 006465 006466 006467 006468 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 010-3100-431.21-10 050-9000-450.21-10 021-4150-410.21-10 025-7100-410.21-10 010-3100-431.21-10 021-4150-410.21-10 025-7100-410.21-10 050-9000-450.21-10 050-1400-414.21-10 050-0000-308.09-10 050-9000-450.40-01 010-3100-431.30-15 010-2500-425.34-05 010-7400-425.34-05 010-1210-412.30-90 010-2500-425.33-10 010-2500-425.33-10 010-3100-431.33-10 021-4150-410.33-30 050-0000-308.09-10 050-0000-229.08-70 021-4150-410.33-30 010-4100-410.30-90 021-4150-410.30-90 050-9000-450.30-90 010-1700-417.10-04 022-4150-410.40-01 125.23 34.90 31.60 31.60 516.98 112.93 46.14 31.58 114.61 1,674.73 * 33.12 33.12 * 1,186.85 1,186.85 * 49.75 49.75 * 475.00 590.00 1,065.00 * 400.00 400.00 368.75 295.00 599.70 1,263.45 * 243.58 243.58 * 4.43 4.43 * 174.96 174.96 * 1,401.84 1,401.84 * 2,743.50 3,802.67 51.67 4,520.00 360.00 11,477.84 * 1,674.73 33.12 1,186.85 49.75 1,065.00 400.00 1,263.45 243.58 4.43 174.96 1,401.84 11,477.84 /3 PREPARED05/29/2002, 15:56:38 PROGRAM: GM346L City of San Jacinto BANK 00 Bank of Hemet ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 13 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2002/12 REPORT NUMBER 49 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 60814 1933 TURNER TRANSMISSIONS 006251 06/06/2002 010-3100-431.33-50 1,654.19 1,654.19 * 60815 369 U.S. POSTMASTER 006223 06/06/2002 006224 06/06/2002 006225 06/06/2002 006226 06/06/2002 006227 06/06/2002 006228 06/06/2002 006229 06/06/2002 006230 06/06/2002 60816 373 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 006215 06/06/2002 60817 1739 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 006212 06/06/2002 006289 06/06/2002 60818 947 V.F.W. POST #2266 006214 06/06/2002 60819 2588 VALLEY DIESEL 006346 06/06/2002 60820 340 VALLEY WIDE RECREATION 006351 06/06/2002 60821 947 VELASCO, JOSE 006216 06/06/2002 60822 526 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 006457 06/06/2002 60823 2798 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 006213 06/06/2002 006347 06/06/2002 006421 06/06/2002 60824 947 WARNEKE, STEVE 006217 06/06/2002 60825 307 XEROX CORPORATION 006219 006220 006297 006298 006299 006300 006301 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 096-1700-417.21-10 010-1700-417.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 099-1700-417.21-10 010-3100-431.21-10 010-3300-431.21-10 010-4100-410.21-10 050-9000-450.21-10 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.21-10 050-9000-450.21-10 050-0000-308.09-10 021-4150-410.33-50 025-7250-410.34-05 050-0000-229.08-70 010-3100-431.35-16 050-9000-450.33-30 021-4150-410.33-30 021-4150-410.33-30 87.57 87.58 349.10 476.09 328.44 16.82 .34 188.20 1,534.14 * 239.00 239.00 * 1,654.19 1,534.14 239.01 7.62 7.93 15.55 * 15.55 9.12 9.12 * 9.12 156.50 156.50 * 156.50 1,688.42 1,688.42 * 1,688.42 8.71 8.71 * 8.71 42.80 42.80 * 42.80 203.22 187.53 56.27 447.02 * 447.01 050-0000-229.08-70 1.40 1.40 * 1.40 010-2500-425.34-05 010-2500-425.34-05 010-7400-425.34-05 010-2500-425.34-05 010-2500-425.34-05 010-2500-425.34-05 021-4150-410.21-10 1,465.69 1,680.64 174.56 767.57 1,357.40 300.67 58.18 /y PREPARED05/29/2002, 15:56:38 PROGRAM: GM346L City of San Jacinto BANK 00 Bank of Hemet ACCOUNTS PAYABLE CHECK REGISTER BY BANK NUMBER PAGE 14 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 2002/12 REPORT NUMBER 49 CHECK VENDOR VENDOR VOUCHER P.O. DATE REMITTANCE AMOUNT CHECK NO NO NAME NO NO ACCOUNT (NET OF DISC/RETAIN) TOTAL 60825 307 XEROX CORPORATION 006302 006303 006304 006305 006306 006463 006488 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 06/06/2002 055-4170-450.21-10 025-7100-410.21-10 010-3100-431.34-05 010-3100-431.34-05 010-3100-431.34-05 010-7400-425.34-05 010-2500-425.34-05 BANK/CHECK TOTAL ALL BANKS/CHECKS TOTAL 58.19 58.19 180.91 365.48 277.79 174.56 300.67 7,220.50 * 7,220.50 631,963.60 631,894.93 631,963.60 631,894.9 15 DETAILED LISTING OF INVOICES (Accounts Payable Update List) PROGP' GM313U Lity or San Jacinto ACCOUNTS PP LE UPDATE LIST GROUP NUMBER ACCOUNTING 3ROUP USER SD GROUP CREATED BY GROUP UPDATED BY PERIOD: 00738 PRE-PAIDS 6/6/2002 RUN 11/2002 MIMIR MIMIR MIMIR PAGE 2 REPOR` MBER 111 TRANS# TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DUE DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS AMOUNT DISC/RETAINAGE 1200 05/20/2002 006263 00 085-0000-202.21-80 CONTRIBUTION FOR MAY 2002 1700 05/23/2002 006268 00 010-2500-425.35-60 STMT DUE BY THE 6/6/02 COUNT: AMOUNT: GROUP TOTALS 17 62,715.26 05/23/200200377 0000000 EDWAY OF MET 00/00/00 0 0000526 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 05/23/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 l7 REQUEST 5/20/02 N 142.38 REQUEST 5/23/02 3,112.98 N PREPARED 05/29/2002, 14:43:52 PROGRAM: GM313U City of San Jacinto ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST GROUP NUMBER ACCOUNTING GROUP USER ID GROUP CREATED BY GROUP UPDATED BY PERIOD: 00712 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 11/2002 MIMIR MIMIR MIMIR PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER 112 TRANS# TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DUE DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS AMOUNT DISC/RETAINAGE 100 05/10/2002 006104 00 074-0000-103.12-25 EMPLOYEE COMPUTER PURCHAS E COUNT: AMOUNT: GROUP TOTALS 1 2,604.00 0000947 GATEWAY 00/00/0000 0060659 05/13/2002 re REQUEST 5/10/02 2,604.00 N PREPARED 05/29/2002, 14:43:52 PROGRAM: GM313U City of San Jacinto ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST GROUP NUMBER ACCOUNTING GROUP USER ID GROUP CREATED BY GROUP UPDATED BY PERIOD: 00714 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 11/2002 MIMIR MIMIR MIMIR PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER 112 TRANS# TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DUE DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS AMOUNT DISC/RETAINAGE 100 05/10/2002 006105 00 050-0000-308.09-10 REIMBURSE CREDIT ACCOUNT 53395 200 04/25/2002 006106 00 050-1400-414.21-10 SUPPLIES 300 05/08/2002 006107 00 025-7250-410.33-30 SUPPLIES 400 05/08/2002 006108 00 055-4170-450.33-30 SUPPLIES 500 05/07/2002 006109 NAME PLATE JEFF BALLINGER 600 05/01/2002 006110 MAY MONTHLY MAINTENANCE 700 05/01/2002 006111 MAY MONTHLY MAINTENANCE 00 010-1700-417.21-10 00 025-7100-410.34-05 00 025-7250-410.34-05 800 05/01/2002 006112 00 025-7251-410.34-05 MAY MONTHLY MAINTENANCE 900 05/01/2002 006113 00 025-7252-410.34-05 MAY MONTHLY MAINTENANCE 1000 05/01/2002 006114 00 025-7250-410.33-30 SUPPLIES 1100 05/02/2002 006115 00 050-9000-450.33-30 SUPPLIES 1200 04/30/2002 006116 00 025-7100-410.33-30 SUPPLIES 1300 04/29/2002 006117 00 025-7252-410.33-30 SUPPLIES 2000 04/25/2002 006124 00 025-7250-410.33-30 SUPPLIES 1400 05/10/2002 006118 00 050-0000-308.09-10 REIMBURSE CREDIT ACCOUNT 21240 0000947 ACAPULCO MEXICAN RESTAURA REQUEST 5/10/02 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 06/06/20020002900000 0R OFFICE 00/00/000ONITURE 414702 06/06/2002 0009310 31 AL'S UBOT0/OTA TRACTOR LAWNM 128242 000006/06/200200027000 000 00/ALL 00/00D0 SEWER TOOLS 21072 06/06/200200997 000 000Y'00/00/0000 ANS TROPHIES 34866 N 0002795 RE LANDSCAPING SERVICE 13847 06/06/20000002795A DO DADS/C PING SERVICE 13847 006/06/20000002795095 00D0 OLD DSCAPING SERVICE 13847 06/06/20000002795 950A0D0 RE LANDSCAPING L0A DS OPIOG SERVICE 13847 0000985 PIPE & 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 PLY 51440 0002049 06/06/2002 0000000 0/ 0/0000 MATERIALS INC. 34N89 0000242 C.E.D. 2983411455 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000242 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 29N314987 0000242 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 29N3411387 0000947 CHACON FARMS REQUEST 5/10/02 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 4 56.93 59.27 32.35 57.44 8.08 4,155.41 5,194.26 2,077.71 14,543.94 86.20 4.09 51.24 401.71 4.46 7.58 PREPARED 05/29/2002, 14:43:52 PROGRAM: GM313U City of San Jacinto ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST GROUP NUMBER ACCOUNTING GROUP USER ID GROUP CREATED BY GROUP UPDATED BY PERIOD: 00714 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 11/2002 MIMIR MIMIR MIMIR PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER 112 TRANS# TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE 'AST TRANS AMOUNT DISC/RETAINAGE 1500 05/10/2002 006119 00 050-0000-308.09-10 REIMBURSE CREDIT ACCOUNT 30052536 1700 04/19/2002 006121 00 050-9000-450.34-05 MAY MAINTENANCE BILLING 1600 04/12/2002 006120 00 050-1400-414.21-10 PAPER SUPPLIES 1800 05/08/2002 006122 REIMBURSE DEPOIST ACCOUNT 1900 05/08/2002 006123 REIMBURSE DEPOIST ACCOUNT 2100 05/07/2002 006125 MAY SERVICE 2700 04/26/2002 006131 ARTESIA WELL SAMPLES 2800 04/29/2002 006132 BACTERIAL ANALYSIS 2200 04/29/2002 006126 UTILITIES 00 050-0000-229.08-70 10052239 00 050-0000-229.08-70 70021102 00 010-2500-425.34-05 00 050-9000-450.33-30 00 050-9000-450.33-30 00 025-7250-410.35-10 2300 04/26/2002 006127 00 025-7250-410.35-10 UTILITIES 2600 05/08/2002 006130 REIMBURSE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 2400 05/08/2002 006128 REIMBURSE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 2500 05/08/2002 006129 REIMBURSE DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 00 050-0000-229.08-70 40002004 00 050-0000-229.08-70 20052745 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000947 CLARK, DAVID 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0002464 COMSERCO 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 COUNTY OF 06/06/200200884 00000000 00/00/0000IDE 0000947 CUBAN CAFE 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 06/06/2002 4700 0000947 NCUNNINGHAM, UING00/00/0000 ANTHONY 0003058 DEWEY SERVICES,INC. 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 REQUEST 5/10/02 N 01/MA5028117 N 10039750 N REQUEST 5/8/02 N REQUEST 5/8/02 N 657181/657178 N 0000949 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC. AD21326-278 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000949 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC. 42303 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000460 PASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST. 4/29/02-4379602 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000460 PASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST. 4/26/02-1490421 N 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000947 ECKBURG, JEREMY & FAITH REQUEST N 00 050-0000-229.08-70 53360 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000947 ESTATE AT RANCHO SAN JACI REQUEST 5/8/02 3100 05/02/2002 006135 00 010-1110-411.11-10 MAY MEMBERSHIP 3200 05/02/2002 006136 00 010-1200-412.11-10 MAY MEMBERSHIP 0000483 EVANS TIRE CO. REQUEST 5/8/02 N 0002744 FAMILY SPORT & FITNESS 447 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0002744 FAMILY SPORT & FITNESS 447 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 20 10.04 86.10 96.91 91.24 14.94 70.00 28.00 48.00 54.70 8.32 19.28 50.00 60.45 20.00 10.00 PREPARED 05/29/2002, 14:43:52 PROGRAM: GM313U City of San Jacinto ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST GROUP NUMBER ACCOUNTING GROUP USER ID GROUP CREATED BY GROUP UPDATED BY PERIOD: 00714 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 11/2002 MIMIR MIMIR MIMIR PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER 112 TRANS# TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DUE DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS AMOUNT DISC/RETAINAGE 3300 05/02/2002 MAY MEMBERSHIP 3400 05/02/2002 MAY MEMBERSHIP 3500 05/02/20'02 MAY MEMBERSHIP 3600 05/02/2002 MAY MEMBERSHIP 3700 05/02/2002 MAY MEMBERSHIP 3800 05/02/2002 MAY MEMBERSHIP 3900 05/02/2002 MAY MEMBERSHIP 4000 05/02/2002 MAY MEMBERSHIP 4100 05/02/2002 MAY MEMBERSHIP 4200 05/02/2002 MAY MEMBERSHIP 4300 05/02/2002 MAY MEMBERSHIP 4400 05/02/2002 MAY MEMBERSHIP 4500 05/02/2002 MAY MEMBERSHIP 4600 05/02/2002 MAY MEMBERSHIP 006137 00 010-1400-414.11-10 006138 00 010-1700-417.11-10 006139 00 010-3100-431.11-10 006140 00 010-3100-431.11-10 006141 00 010-3300-431.11-10 006142 00 010-7400-425.11-10 006143 00 021-4150-410.11-10 006144 00 025-7250-410.11-10 006145 00 050-1400-414.11-10 006146 00 050-9000-450.11-10 006147 00 055-4170-450.11-10 006148 00 096-1200-412.11-10 006149 00 096-1700-417.11-10 006150 00 099-1700-417.11-10 3000 05/10/2002 006134 00 050-0000-308.09-10 REIMBURSE CREDIT ACCOUNT 20004080 0002744 FAMILY SPORT & FITNESS 447 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0002744 SPORT & 06/06/2002 000000LY00/00/0000ITNESS 0002744 SPORT & 06/06/2002 000000LY00/00/00002TNESS 0002744 SPORT & 06/06/2002 000000LY00/00/0000ITNESS 447 N 447 N 447 N 0002744 FAMILY SPORT & FITNESS 447 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N SPORT & 06/06/200202744 0000 00LY00/00/0000ISS 00SPORT & 06/06/200202744 0000000FLY00/00/00002SS 00SPORT & 06/06/200202744 0000000LY00/00/00002SS 00SPORT & 06/06/200202744 0000000LY00/00/0000ISS 00SPORT & 06/06/200202744 0000 00LY00/00/0000ISS 0002744 SPORT & 06/06/2002 000000LY00/00/0000ITNESS 0002744 SPORT & 06/06/2002 000000LY00/00/0000ITNESS 447 N 447 N 447 N 447 N 447 N 447 447 N 0002744 FAMILY SPORT & FITNESS 447 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0002744 FAMILY SPORT & FITNESS 447 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 06/06/200200947 OA0000000 R00, ANGEL /00/0000 21 REQUEST 5/10/02 N 40.00 10.00 330.00 100.00 30.00 10.00 80.00 10.00 10.00 80.00 10.00 10.00 30.00 10.00 40.46 PREPARED 05/29/2002, 14:43:52 PROGRAM: GM313U GROUP NUMBER ACCOUNTING GROUP USER ID GROUP CREATED BY GROUP UPDATED BY PERIOD: 00714 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 11/2002 MIMIR MIMIR MIMIR City of San Jacinto ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER 112 TRANS# TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE DUE DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS DER AMOUNT DISC/RETAINAGE 2900 05/10/2002 006133 REIMBURSE CREDIT ACCOUNT 4700 05/08/2002 006151 POWERPOINT PHOTO SHOOT 4800 05/06/2002 006152 SERVICES RENDERED FOR 4900 05/06/2002 006153 SERVICES RENDERED FOR 5200 05/10/2002 006158 REIMBURSE WATER DEPOSIT 5100 05/01/2002 006157 REIMBURSE WATER DEPOSIT 5300 05/08/2002 SUPPLIES 5600 05/02/2002 SUPPLIES 00 050-0000-308.09-10 51332 00 096-1700-417.30-90 00 026-7501-410.30-92 MARCH AND EARLY APRIL 00 025-1400-414.30-90 MARCH 00 050-0000-308.09-10 ACCOUNT 51331 00 050-0000-229.08-70 ACCOUNT 52243 006159 00 055-4170-450.33-30 006162 00 050-9000-450.33-30 5500 05/08/2002 006161 00 050-0000-229.08-70 REIMBURSE WATER DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 40024059 5000 05/06/2002 SUPPLIES 5400 05/06/2002 SUPPLIES 5700 05/07/2002 SUPPLIES 006154 00 050-9000-450.33-10 006160 00 050-9000-450.33-30 006163 00 010-1700-417.21-10 5800 05/08/2002 006164 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 5900 04/27/2002 006165 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 6000 05/08/2002 006166 REIMBURSE WATER DEPOSIT 00 055-4170-450.33-50 00 025-7100-410.33-50 00 050-0000-229.08-70 ACCOUNT 53261 S 06/06/200200947 0000000nGT 00/0HO0/0000 GEDESIGN 06/06/200203081 0000000�00/00/0000 REQUEST 5/10/02 211312002 N 0000515 GFB-FRIEDRICH & ASSOC., I F1250-0110 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000515 GFB-FRIEDRICH & ASSOC., I F1250-0111 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 06/06/2002000090000000H0T00, JOE 0/00/0000 REQUEST 5/10/02 N 0000947 HEMET 06/06/2002 0000000 0000564 HEMET 06/06/2002 0000000 0000564 HEMET 06/06/2002 0000000 FEDERAL BANK 00/00/0000 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 00/00/0000 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 00/00/0000 47 HICKS, GLORIA 06/06/20020090000000 00/00/0000 REQUEST 5/10/02 18032 N 18012 N REQUEST 5/8/02 N 0002641 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICE 4011668 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0002641 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICE 6011415 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000600 STATIONERY 06/06/2002 00S 00/00/0000 56699 N AUTOMOTIVE 06/06/200200631 0000000J 00/00/0000 016303 N AUTOMOTIVE 06/06/200200631 0000000J 00/00/0000 016321 N 06/06/2002 0000947007 JJONOINGS, CC/RL REQUEST 5/8/02 163.05 204.72 1,277.47 4,494.43 83.42 24.80 64.24 7.46 9.54 12.25 360.73 18.32 11.62 47.71 61.29 PREPARED 05/29/2002, 14:43:52 PROGRAM: GM313U City of San Jacinto ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST GROUP NUMBER ACCOUNTING GROUP USER ID GROUP CREATED BY GROUP UPDATED BY PERIOD: 00714 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 11/2002 MIMIR MIMIR MIMIR PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER 112 TRANS# TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DUE DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS AMOUNT DISC/RETAINAGE 6100 05/08/2002 006167 SUPPLIES 6400 04/23/2002 006170 SUPPLIES 6200 05/07/2002 006168 LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS/PLATS 6300 05/08/2002 006169 REIMBURSE WATER DEPOSIT 6900 04/25/2002 006175 SUPPLIES 6500 05/06/2002 006171 UNIFORM SUPPLY 6600 05/06/2002 006172 UNIFORM SUPPLY 6700 05/06/2002 006173 UNIFORM SUPPLY 6800 05/08/2002 006174 REIMBURSE WATER DEPOSIT 7000 05/03/2002 006176 SUPPLIES 8000 05/11/2002 006186 INSTALL/PURCHASE PANIC 8100 05/01/2002 006187 MAY SERVICES 8200 05/01/2002 006188 MAY SERVICES 7100 04/15/2002 006177 SUPPLIES 7200 03/28/2002 006178 SUPPLIES 00 050-9000-450.33-30 00 050-9000-450.33-30 00 096-1700-417. 00 050-0000-229. ACCOUNT 1002075 30-90 08-70 0 00 050-9000-450.33-30 00 025-7100-410.21-35 00 021-4150-410.21-35 00 021-4150-410.21-35 00 050-0000-229.08-70 ACCOUNT 20015008 00 021-4150-410.33-50 00 010-2500-425.33-10 ALARM AT CITY HAL 00 010-2500-425.33-10 00 050-9000-450.34-05 00 050-9000-450.21-80 00 050-9000-450.21-80 0002908 LA CHEMCIAL 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0002908 LA CHEMCIAL 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 195009 195179 N 06/06/20020002700060 00AG00/00/000000NTRACT SURVEY 02-057 0000947 LARSON, FRANCIS 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000710 MARDEN-SUSCO 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 REQUEST 5/8/02 N S1135473-001 N 06/06/20020000700 0000MISSION 00 00/0 00UNIFORM SERVICES, 17N83527 06/06/2002000070000000?41S910N 00 00/0 00UNIFORM SERVICES, 17N63526 06/06/200200007000000032 1000 00/0000UNIFORM SERVICES, 17N83526 06/06/2002000000000 00/00/000047 0000767 NIKON-EGLI EQUIPMENT 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000963 PACIFIC ALARM SVC., 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000963 06/06/20020000000FI00//0r0/0000C REQUEST 5/8/02 N 10228943 N INC. 24668 N INC. 24508 N 06/06/200200009000000063 FI00//000//0000C., INC. 24508 0001001 PIERCE PLUMBING 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 28951 N 0001001 06/06/20020000000CE00/ 0/0000 28936 406.76 1,707.98 500.00 6.51 740.24 15.35 37.74 5.83 3.41 91.35 187.00 87.00 223.50 34.25 68.54 73 PREPARED 05/29/2002, 14:43:52 PROGRAM: GM313U City of San Jacinto ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST GROUP NUMBER ACCOUNTING GROUP USER ID GROUP CREATED BY GROUP UPDATED BY PERIOD: 00714 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 11/2002 MIMIR MIMIR MIMIR PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER 112 TRANS# TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DUE DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS AMOUNT DISC/RETAINAGE 7300 04/01/2002 006179 00 025-7100-410.33-30 SUPPLIES 7400 03/25/2002 006180 00 025-7100-410.33-30 SUPPLIES 7500 04/25/2002 006181 00 055-4170-450.21-80 SUPPLIES 7900 05/08/2002 00618 REIMBURSE WATER DEPOSIT 8300 04/18/2002 00618 ADVERTISING FEES 7600 05/10/2002 006182 SUPPLIES 7700 05/08/2002 006183 SUPPLIES 7800 05/08/2002 006184 SUPPLIES 8400 05/08/2002 006190 REIMBURSE WATER DEPOSIT 8500 05/08/2002 006191 REIMBURSE OVERPAYMENT 8700 05/08/2002 006193 REIMBURSE OVERPAYMENT 8600 05/08/2002 006192 REIMBURSE WATER DEPOSIT 8800 04/29/2002 006194 SUPPLIES 8900 03/31/2002 006195 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR 9300 04/15/2002 006199 FUEL USAGE FOR JANUARY TO 5 00 050-0000-229.08-70 ACCOUNT 54476 9 00 00 00 00 010-1700-417.36-25 055-4170-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-50 055-4170-450.33-50 00 050-0000-229.08-70 ACCOUNT 2403 00 050-0000-308.09-10 ACCOUNT 2403 00 050-0000-308.09-10 ACCOUNT 20052018 00 050-0000-229.08-70 ACCOUNT 20052018 00 025-7260-410.21-30 00 010-1400-414.10-04 MARCH 2002 00 021-4150-410.21-70 MARCH 06/06/200201001 0000000CE0PLMBING 0/00/ 000 PLBING 06/06/200201001 0000000CE00/0 /0000 PLG 06/06/200201001 0000000CE00/00/0000 AUTOMOTIVE 06/06/200200947 0000000TS00 00/0000 06/06/200202606 0000 00S ENTERPRISE00/0000 AUTO 06/06/200200597 00000 0ITY 00/00/0000 TS AUTO 06/06/20020000597 00000 0I TY 00/ 0/00 0T5 00AUTO 06/06/200200597 00000 0IT00/ 0/0000T5 0003095 R.J. 06/06/2002 0000000 0003095 R.J. 06/06/2002 0000000 NOBLE COMPANY 00/00/0000 NOBLE COMPANY 00/00/0000 28939 N 28929 N 28962 N REQUEST 5/8/02 N 1500838 N D508961 N D508719 N D508813 N REQUEST 5/8/02 N REQUEST 5/8/02 N 0000947 EXPRESS REQUEST 5/8/02 N 06/06/200200009000047 0000NA00/00/0000 EXPRSS RV REQUEST 5/8/02 N 0003061 REGENCY LIGHTING 021408 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0003071 ROGERS,ANDERSON,MALODY & 3/31/2002 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000916 SAN JACINTO UNIFIED SCHOO 54 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 6.57 36.86 17.39 117.36 234.24 16.15 2.14 6.54 450.00 76.44 13.48 100.00 311.35 4,900.00 1,347.47 z( PREPARED 05/29/2002, 14:43:52 PROGRAM: GM313U City of San Jacinto ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST GROUP NUMBER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: GROUP USER ID GROUP CREATED BY GROUP UPDATED BY 00714 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 11/2002 MIMIR MIMIR MIMIR PAGE 8 REPORT NUMBER 112 TRANS# TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DUE DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS AMOUNT DISC/RETAINAGE 9400 04/15/2002 006200 FUEL USAGE FOR JANUARY TO 9900 05/06/2002 006208 OVERVIEWS 9600 05/03/2002 006204 SUPPLIES 9700 05/02/2002 006205 SUPPLIES 9100 05/10/2002 006197 REIMBURSE OVERPAYMENT 9200 04/24/2002 006198 SUUPLIES 9800 05/06/2002 006207 SUPPLIES 9000 05/10/2002 006196 REIMBURSE OVERPAYMENT 9500 05/08/2002 006202 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR 10000 05/10/2002 006209 REIMBURSE OVERPAYMENT 10100 05/08/2002 006210 REIMBURSE WATER DEPOSIT 10500 05/08/2002 006215 POPULATION CHARGES 10200 04/27/2002 006212 POSTAGE SERVICE 10400 05/10/2002 006214 REIMBURSE OVERPAYMENT 10600 05/08/2002 006216 REIMBURSE WATER DEPOSIT 00 050-9000-450.21-70 MARCH 00 010-1100-411.36-10 00 021-4150-410.33-30 00 050-9000-450.33-10 00 050-0000-308.09-10 FOR ACCOUNT 1000 00 021-4150-410.33-50 00 050-1400-414.21-10 00 050-0000-308.09-10 FOR ACCOUNT 50089 00 050-9000-450.40-01 MARCH 2002 00 050-0000-308.09-10 ACCOUNT 10053383 00 050-0000-229.08-70 ACCOUNT 53359 00 050-9000-450.33-30 00 050-9000-450.21-10 00 050-0000-308.09-10 ACCOUNT 54600 00 050-0000-229.08-70 ACCOUNT 70019106 SAN 06/06/200200916 0000000JACINTO 00 00/ 000IED 0000958 SAWMILL GRAPHICS 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000822 SHARPS ACE HARDWARE 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000822 SHARPS ACE HARDWARE 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000947 SIGALA, ROBERT 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0002759 SOUTH KERN MACHINERY 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000420 STAPLES 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 SCHOO 54 N 2985 N 619693 N 619587 N REQUEST 5/10/02 N 523287 N 3861 N 0000947 STEELWELD OF CALIFORNIA REQUEST 5/10/02 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 02-045 0000947 STESTON ENGINEERS 10452 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000947 TAYLOR, TOMMY REQUEST 5/10/02 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000947 TERRACINA APARTMENTS 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000373 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0001739 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000947 V.F.W. POST #2266 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000947 VELASCO, JOSE 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 REQUEST 5/8/02 N 02040673 N TT8707172 N REQUEST 5/10/02 N REQUEST 5/8/02 N 32.48 1,363.04 83.87 24.05 44.32 33.82 88.23 33.12 1,186.85 4.43 174.96 239.00 7.62 9.12 8.71 PREPARED 05/29/2002, 14:43:52 PROGRAM: GM313U City of San Jacinto ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST GROUP NUMBER ACCOUNTING GROUP USER ID GROUP CREATED BY GROUP UPDATED BY PERIOD: 00714 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 11/2002 MIMIR MIMIR MIMIR PAGE 9 REPORT NUMBER 112 TRANS# TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DUE DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS AMOUNT DISC/RETAINAGE 10300 04/26/2002 006213 00 050-9000-450.33-30 SUPPLIES 10700 05/08/2002 006217 00 050-0000-229.08-70 REIMBURSE WATER DEPOSIT ACCOUNT 3066 10800 05/02/2002 006219 COPIER SERVICE 10900 05/01/2002 006220 COPIER SERVICE COUNT: AMOUNT: 00 010-2500-425.34-05 00 010-2500-425.34-05 GROUP TOTALS 109 53,486.18 06/06/2002 00027980 98 00� N0MATE/IALS COMPANY 972395 0000947 WARNEKE, STEVE 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 CORP 06/06/200200307 000 000X 00/00 0000N 0000307 XEROX CORPORATION 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 REQUEST 5/8/02 N 88635180 N 88570401 203.22 1.40 1,465.69 1,680.64 70 PREPARED 05/29/2002, 14:43:52 PROGRAM: GM313U City of San Jacinto ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST GROUP NUMBER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: GROUP USER ID GROUP CREATED BY GROUP UPDATED BY 00724 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 11/2002 MIMIR MIMIR MIMIR PAGE 10 REPORT NUMBER 113 TRANS# TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DUE DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS AMOUNT DISC/RETAINAGE 300 05/14/2002 006206 PARKING VIOLATION FEES 400 05/14/2002 006211 PARKING VIOLATION FEES 500 05/13/2002 006218 REIMBUSEMENT ON WATER DEP 200 05/08/2002 006203 REIMBURSE WATER DEPOSIT 600 05/06/2002 006221 REIM EXPENSES FOR CONTRAC 100 05/13/2002 006201 REIMBURSE WATER DEPOSIT 00 010-0000-304.03-35 FOR MONTH OF MARCH 2002 00 050-0000-229.08-70 FOR MONTH OF MARCH 2002 00 050-0000-229.08-70 ACCT 70002196 00 050-0000-229.08-70 ACCT 59701 00 010-2500-425.30-90 T YEAR 2001-02 00 050-0000-229.08-70 ACCT 60023048 700 05/11/2002 006222 00 010-2500-425.21-10 SUPPLIES 800 05/10/2002 006223 00 096-1700-417.21-10 POSTAGE REIMBURSMENT 900 05/10/2002 006224 00 010-1700-417.21-10 POSTAGE REIMBURSMENT 1000 05/10/2002 006225 00 010-2500-425.21-10 POSTAGE REIMBURSMENT 1100 05/10/2002 006226 00 099-1700-417.21-10 POSTAGE REIMBURSMENT 1200 05/10/2002 006227 00 010-3100-431.21-10 POSTAGE REIMBURSMENT 1300 05/10/2002 006228 00 010-3300-431.21-10 POSTAGE REIMBURSMENT 1400 05/10/2002 006229 00 POSTAGE REIMBURSMENT 010-4100-410.21-10 1500 05/10/2002 006230 00 050-9000-450.21-10 POSTAGE REIMBURSMENT OF 06/06/200200877 00000000 Y00/00/ 000IDE 0000947 DAVID COTTON 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 , DREW 06/06/200200947 0000000ERICH00/00/ 000 0000947 JACKIE BURNEY 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0002593 MARK ISRAEL 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000947 ROSEMARY ARAIZA 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000420 STAPLES 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 9 U.S.TER 06/06/20020030OS 000000 P00/00/0000 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER 05/20/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 REQUEST 5/14/02 N REQUEST 5/14/02 N REQUEST 5/13/02 N REQUEST 5/0B/02 N REQUEST 5/6/02 N REQUEST 5/13/02 N 12085 N REQUEST N REQUEST N REQUEST N REQUEST N 5/10/02 5/10/02 5/10/02 5/10/02 REQUEST 5/10/02 N REQUEST 5/10/02 N REQUEST 5/10/02 N 198.00 88.49 3.79 217.57 934.66 18.03 75.12 87.57 87.58 349.10 476.09 328.44 16.82 .34 REQUEST 5/10/02 188.20 N 1 7 PREPARED 05/29/2002, 14:43:52 PROGRAM: GM313U City of San Jacinto ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST PAGE 11 REPORT NUMBER 113 GROUP NUMBER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: GROUP USER ID GROUP CREATED BY GROUP UPDATED BY 00724 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 11/2002 MIMIR MIMIR MIMIR TRANS# TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE TART TRANS DISC/RETAINAGE COUNT: AMOUNT: GROUP TOTALS 15 3,069.80 29 PROGRAM: GM313U ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST rHVB 16 REPORT NUMBER 113 GROUP NUMBER ACCOUNTING GROUP USER ID GROUP CREATED BY GROUP UPDATED BY PERIOD: 00728 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 11/2002 MIMIR MIMIR MIMIR TRANS# TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DUE DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS AMOUNT DISC/RETAINAGE 800 05/16/2002 006238 SHAWDOW BOX 600 05/13/2002 006236 SUPPLIES 700 05/13/2002 006237 CITY COUNCIL LETTERHEAD 900 05/03/2002 006239 GASOLINE 1000 05/14/2002 006240 SUPPLIES 1200 05/16/2002 006242 S.J. POLICE DEPT 1300 05/16/2002 006243 S.J. POLICE DEPT 1100 04/14/2002 006241 SUPPLIES 1400 04/24/2002 006244 SUPPLIES 1500 04/07/2002 006245 SUPPLIES 1600 05/01/2002 006246 EQUIP RENTAL FOR MAY 2002 300 05/20/2002 006233 2002-2003 ANNUAL BUDGET 400 05/20/2002 006234 2002-2003 ANNUAL BUDGET 500 05/20/2002 006235 2002-2003 ANNUAL BUDGET 100 05/06/2002 006231 SUPPLIES 00 010-3100-431.21-10 00 010-1700-417.21-10 00 010-1110-411.21-10 00 010-3100-431.21-70 00 010-2500-425.34-05 00 010-3100-431.30-17 00 010-3100-431.30-17 00 010-1700-417.21-10 00 010-3100-431.21-35 00 010-3100-431.21-35 00 010-3100-431.21-19 00 010-2500-425.21-10 COPIES 00 010-2500-425.21-10 COPIES 00 010-2500-425.21-10 COPIES 00 021-4150-410.33-50 0000997 ANADY'S TROPHIES 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000952 ARROW PRINTING 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000952 ARROW PRINTING 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000227 CHEVRON 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0000947 ELITE FIRE PROTECTON 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 34958 N 2700 N 2699 N STMT 5/3/02 N 17223 N 0001584 HEMET EMERGENCY MED*GROUP 12/29/01 GUTIER 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0001584 HEMET EMERGENCY MED*GROUP 12/29/01 MAGANA 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000299 HEMET RUBBER STAMP 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 34894 N 0000618 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. 445952 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000618 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. 443233-80 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000963 PACIFIC ALARM SVC., INC. 24512 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0002480 PIP PRINTING 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0002480 PIP PRINTING 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0002480 PIP PRINTING 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 0002759 SOUTH KERN MACHINERY 06/06/2002 0000000 00/00/0000 57949 N 57977 N 57839 N 524435 N 73.27 297.39 241.36 17.40 55.00 157.00 157.00 16.00 150.85 43.10 26.00 251.70 490.73 747.68 44.03 Zct