Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 2/5/2004AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 5, 2004, 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call 1.3 Invocation — Rev. Bob Sauter, Faith Tabernacle, San Jacinto 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance 1.5 Special Presentations 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Now is the time for the public to address the Council on any subject within the jurisdiction of the City Council not listed on the agenda. A recap of the nonagendized comments will be addressed under item number 2.1 during the City's second regular meeting of the month. 3. PUBLIC HEARING 3.1 Resolution No. _ / A Resolution making certain determinations and authorizing the submittal of the levy of special taxes to the qualified electors of certain territory proposed to be annexed into Community Facilities District 2003-1 (CFD 2003-1 Annexation No. 2) / Approve and Adopt / City Attorney & City Consultant 4. CITY DEPARTMENTS 4.1 Traffic Calming Standards; Traffic Calming Improvements — placement and installation of speed humps along Warwick Street, Roanoke Street, Serena Court, and Savory Lane / Approve / City Engineer 4.2 Fire Stations / Fire Department's recommended site plan for future fire stations / Approve / Battalion Fire Chief City Council Agenda February 5, 2003 Pape 2 of 3 4.3 Traffic Reports for the intersections of State Street and Idyilwild Drive, Main Street between Sheriff Avenue and Ramona Expressway, and Chase Street at Cypress and Sagecrest Drive / Approve and Authorize implementation of recommendations / City Engineer 4.4 Weed Abatement on undeveloped parkway areas / Approve / Public Works 5. CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by City Council Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Mayor; state their name, address and the consent calendar item number. Speakers should Emit comments to three (3) minutes. 5.1 Warrant Register for Warrants, Prepaid Checks, and Payroll Checks Period Ending 02/05/04 / Approve / Finance Director 5.2 January 22, 2004 Regular Meeting Minutes / Approve / City Clerk 5.3 Treasurer's Report December 31, 2003 / Approve / Finance Director 5.4 Lake Park Drive Well and Main Street Waterline (Project No. 02-022) ! Authorize bid advertisement for construction / City Engineer 5.5 Final Tract Maps 30462 and 30462-1 / Greystone Homes Inc / Approve and Authorize City Manager to execute subdivision agreements / City Engineer 5.6 Ramona Boulevard / Sanderson Avenue Waterline — Project No. 02-008 / Approve public works contract to Utah Pacific Construction Company for $385,450 and reject all other bids / City Engineer 5.7 Resolution No. _ / A Resolution of Initiation Ordering the District Engineer to prepare and to file a report related to maintenance of public improvements in Lighting, Landscaping Park District No. 1 (LLPD No. 1) for Fiscal Year 2004-2005 Property Tax Roll / Approve and Adopt / Finance Director 5.8 Resolution No. / A Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the levy and collection of Lighting, Landscaping Park District No. 2 (LLPD No. 2) Annual Assessments for FY 2004-05 and ordering District Engineer to prepare and file report related to maintenance of public improvements in LLPD No. 2 for Fiscal Year 2004-2005 Property Tax Roll / Approve and Adopt / Finance Director City Council Agenda February 5, 2003 Page 3 of 3 6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS 6.1 Painting City Hall / Direct staff / Council Member Shaw 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Police Officers Association 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Sergeants Association 7.3 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION Subdivision (a) of Section 94956.9 Name of Case: Tony's Sea Landing v. City of San Jacinto, Us Bankruptcy Ct Case No. RS 01-17735 DN 7.4 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION Subdivision (a) of Section 94956.9 Name of Case: City of San Jacinto vs. Camilo Primero, M.D., Inc. Riverside County Superior Court Case No. 404638 7.5 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL —ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.5: Two (2) or more cases 8. ADJOURNMENT CHALLENGE TO LAND USE DECISIONS: Any person seeking to challenge a decision regarding land use made by the City Council as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and the discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the City Council, shall be required to commence that action 90 days following the date on which the decision of the City Council becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Please refer to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes final. It is the intention of the City of San Jacinto to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact City Hall at (909) 487-7330, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. 1. v0144 4. eltathrafue, e d e i (6 Sao paciota, k y cettch rl t 9 cued a 6e AOated tl:e pupae, afeocla tiria 30t4 dav a6 may. 2004 a 4 eau, AGENDA ITEM 3' February 5, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Special Tax Consultant , City Attorney and Finance Special DistrictsQ SUBJECT: Annexation #2 of Territory into Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 for Police and Fire Services RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution of intention to annex territory into Community Facilities District No. 2003-01. BACKGROUND: The City Council and Planning Commission have recently identified the need for additional funding sources for police protection and fire protection and suppression services, especially those services that are created by new development within the City. In response to the need for additional funding for such services, the City Council formed Community Facilities District 2003-1 (the "District') and the levy of special taxes therein. On November 6, 2003, the City Council called an election of the landowners affected by the formation of the District and the levy of special taxes. The landowners approved the formation of the District and levy of special taxes with over a two-thirds majority vote of the voters voting. Willow Creek LLP is developing certain real property (APN 439-110-002) that will be developed into a multi -family housing project near the boundaries of the District. As a condition to receiving the building permits from the City, Willow Creek LLP must annex its territory into the District. Willow Creek LLP now desires to obtain building permits and annex such real property into the District. JUSTIFICATION: The adoption of the resolution is required to begin the annexation process into the District. BUDGETARY IMPACT: The annexation of the Willow Creek LLP property into the District will have a beneficial impact to the City's budget in that, upon implementation of the proposed financing district, it would assist in the funding of police and fire services that would otherwise come from the City's general fund. 1 City Manager: Finance Director: STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE SAN JACINTO CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF CERTAIN TERRITORY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA (the "City Council"), has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory (the "Annexation Area") to an existing community facilities district and an improvement area thereto pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello - Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof (the "Act") and the City of San Jacinto Ordinance Conditioning the Issuance of Building Permits on Annexation into Police, Fire and Road Maintenance Financing Districts enacted pursuant to the powers reserved by the City of San Jacinto under Sections 7 of Article XI of the Constitution of the State of California (the "Ordinance") (the Act and the Ordinance may be referred to collectively as the "Community Facilities District Law"). The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing relating to the annexation of such territory to the District, the extent of such territory, the financing of Authorized Services (as defined in Section 4 below) and all other related matters has been given; and, WHEREAS, it has now been determined that written protests have not been received by fifty percent (50%) or more of the registered voters residing either within the Annexation Area or the District and/or property owners representing more than one-half (1/2) or more of the area of land within the Annexed Area or within the District; and, WHEREAS, inasmuch as there have been less than twelve (12) persons registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the ninety (90) preceding days, this legislative body desires to submit the levy of the required special tax to the landowners of the Annexation Area, said landowners being the qualified electors as authorized by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. RECITALS The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. DETERMINATIONS It is determined by this City Council that: A. all proceedings to consider the annexation of the Annexation Area to the District prior hereto were valid and taken in conformity with the requirements of law, and specifically the provisions of the Community Facilities District Law; B. the annexation of the Annexation Area to the District as proposed conforms with the policies of City of San Jacinto; C. less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the Annexation Area for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the close of the public hearing and, consequently, the qualified electors shall be the landowners of the Annexation Area and each landowner who is the owner of record as of the close of the public hearing, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land that she or he owns within the Annexation Area; D. the time limit specified by the Community Facilities District Law for conducting an election to submit the levy of the special taxes to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area and the requirements for impartial analysis and ballot arguments have been waived with the unanimous consent of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area; E. the City Clerk, acting as the election official, has consented to conducting any required election on a date which is less than one hundred twenty-five (125) days following the adoption of any resolution annexing the Annexation Area to the District; and F. the Authorized Services proposed to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes to be levied within the Annexation Area are in addition to maintenance provided to the Annexation Area before the annexation thereof to the District. SECTION 3. BOUNDARIES OF ANNEXED AREA. The boundaries and parcels of land in the Annexation Area and on which special taxes are proposed to be levied in order to pay the costs and expenses of the Authorized Services are generally described as follows: All that property and territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as said property is shown on a map as previously approved by this legislative body, said map designated as Annexation Map No. 2 of Community Facilities District No. 2003-1, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and shall remain open for public inspection. SECTION 4. DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED SERVICES. The services that are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District (the "Authorized Services") are generally described as (a) additional police protection services, including but not limited to, criminal justice services and (b) additional fire protection and suppression services throughout the District. The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual costs and expenses necessary to provide the Authorized Services. The Authorized Services authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are also the Authorized Services to be provided in the Annexation Area. If and to the extent possible the Authorized Services shall be provided in common within the District and the Annexation Area. SECTION 5. SPECIAL TAXES. Except where funds are otherwise available a special tax, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the Annexation Area, is hereby authorized, subject to voter approval, to be levied within the boundaries of the Annexation Area. For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area, reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit A (the "Rate and Method of Apportionment"), which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment of the special tax to allow each landowner or resident within the Annexation Area to estimate the maximum amount that such person will have to pay. Such special tax shall be utilized to fund the Special Tax Requirement as such term is defined in the Rate and Method of Apportionment. The special taxes herein authorized, to the extent possible, shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency as applicable for ad valorem taxes; provided, however, the District may utilize a direct billing procedure for any special taxes that cannot be collected on the County tax roll or may, by resolution, elect to collect the special taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations. Under no circumstances will the special tax to be levied against any parcel within the Annexation Area used for private residential purposes be increased as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other parcel or parcels within the District by more than ten percent (10%). Upon recordation of a Notice of Special Tax Lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California against the property within the Annexation Area, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the special tax shall attach to all non-exempt real property in the Annexation Area and this lien shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien canceled in accordance with law or until collection of the tax by the legislative body ceases. SECTION 6. SPECIAL TAX ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES. Pursuant to and in compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50075.1, this City Council hereby establishes the following accountability measures pertaining to the levy by the District of the special taxes within the Annexation Area as described in Section 5 above: A. Each such special tax shall be levied for the specific purposes set forth in Section 5 above. B. The proceeds of the levy of each such special tax shall be applied only to the specific applicable purposes set forth in Section 5 above. C. The District shall establish a separate account into which the proceeds of the special taxes levied within the District shall be deposited. D. The City Manager or his or her designee, acting for and on behalf of the District, shall annually file a report with the City Council as required pursuant to Government Code Section 50075.3. SECTION 7. ELECTION. The proposition related to the levy of the special tax shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, said electors being the landowners, with each landowner having one (1) vote for each acre or portion thereof of land which he or she owns within the Annexation Area. The election shall be held on March 4, 2004, and such election shall be a special election to be conducted by the City Clerk (hereinafter "Election Official"). If the proposition for the levy of the special tax receives the approval of more than two- thirds (2/3) of the votes cast on the proposition, the special tax may be levied as provided for in this Resolution. SECTION 8. BALLOT The ballot proposal to be submitted to the qualified voters at the election shall generally be as follows: PROPOSITION A CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 ANNEXATION MAP NO. 2 AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL TAX LEVY Shall Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 of the City of San Jacinto be authorized to levy special taxes, subject to the accountability measures set forth in Resolution No. within the territory identified in Annexation Map No. 2 to such district therein pursuant to the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes (the "Rate and Method") set forth in such resolution for the purpose of funding the Special Tax Requirement as such term is defined in the Rate and Method? SECTION 9. VOTE The appropriate mark placed in the line before the word "YES" shall be counted in favor of the adoption of the proposition, and the appropriate mark placed in the line before the word "NO" in the manner as authorized, shall be counted against the adoption of said proposition. SECTION 10. ELECTION PROCEDURE This City Council hereby authorizes the Election Official to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of said election and ratifies any such steps previously taken by such Election Official which were necessary for the holding of such election. Said Election Official shall perform and render all services and proceedings incidental to and connected with the conduct of said election, and said services shall include, but not be limited to the following: A. Prepare and furnish to the election officers necessary election supplies for the conduct of the election. B. Cause to be printed the requisite sheets and other necessary forms. C. Furnish and address official ballots Annexation Area. number of official ballots, tally for the qualified electors of the D. Cause the official ballots to be mailed and/or delivered, as required by law. E. Receive the returns of the election. F. Sort and assemble the election material and supplies in preparation for the canvassing of the returns. G. Canvass the returns of the election. H. Furnish a tabulation of the number of votes given in the election. I. Make all arrangements and take the necessary steps to pay all costs of the election incurred as a result of services performed by the District and pay costs and expenses of all election officials. J. Conduct and handle all other matters relating to the proceedings and conduct of the election in the manner and form as required by law. PREPARED BY: Jeffrey S. Ballinger BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP City Attorney EXHIBIT "A" RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES [Attach revised rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for Community Facilities District 2003-1] SHEET 1 OF 1 ANNEXATION MAP NO. 2 TO CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Reference is hereby made to that certain map entitled "Amended Boundaries of City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1, County of Riverside, State of California," filed the 22nd day of December, 2003, at the hour of 8 o'clock a.m. in Book 55 at pages 58-59, and as instrument number 2003-995886 in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, State of California, which this Annexation Map affects. LEGEND Boundaries of Annexation No. 2 to City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 439-110-002 Assessor Parcel Number Esplanade 0 0 c o Prepared by David Taussig & Associates, Inc. Assessor Parcel Number within Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities District No. 2003-1: 439-110-002 Ave Exempt recording requested per CA Government Code § 6103 La Entrada Reference is hereby made to the Assessor maps of the County of Riverside for an exact description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel. Commonwealth Ave (1) Filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto this day of , 2004. Dorothy Chouinard, San Jacinto City Clerk (2) I hereby certify that the within map showing the proposed boundaries of Annexation No. 2 to City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1, Riverside County, State of California, was approved by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on this day of , 2004, by its Resolution No. Dorothy Chouinard, San Jacinto City Clerk (3) Filed this day of , 2004, at the hour of o'clock _m, in Book of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at page and as Instrument No. in the office of the County Recorder of Riverside County, State of California. Fee County Recorder of Riverside County EXHIBIT B CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT A-1 RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO A Special Tax as hereinafter defined shall be levied on all Assessor's Parcels in Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 of the City of San Jacinto ("CFD No. 2003-1") and collected each Fiscal Year commencing in Fiscal Year 2003-2004, in an amount determined by the Council through the application of the appropriate Special Tax for "Developed Property" as described below. All of the real property in CFD No. 2003-1, unless exempted by law or by the provisions hereof, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent and in the manner herein provided. A. DEFINITIONS The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings: "Acre or Acreage" means the land area of an Assessor's Parcel as shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable final map, parcel map, condominium plan, or other recorded County parcel map. "Act" means the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. "Administrative Expenses" means the following actual or reasonably estimated costs directly related to the administration of CFD No. 2003-1: the costs of computing the Special Taxes and preparing the annual Special Tax collection schedules (whether by the City or designee thereof or both); the costs of collecting the Special Taxes (whether by the County or otherwise); the costs to the City, CFD No. 2003-1 or any designee thereof of complying with City or CFD No. 2003-1 disclosure requirements; the costs associated with responding to public inquiries regarding the Special Taxes; the costs of the City, CFD No. 2003-1 or any designee thereof related to an appeal of the Special Tax; and the City's annual administration fees and third party expenses. Administrative Expenses shall also include amounts estimated or advanced by the City or CFD No. 2003-1 for any other administrative purposes of CFD No. 2003-1, including attorney's fees and other costs related to commencing and pursuing to completion any foreclosure of delinquent Special Taxes. "Apartment Property" means any Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property that consists of a building or buildings comprised of attached residential units available for rental, but not purchase, by the general public and under common management. "Assessor's Parcel Map" means an official map of the Assessor of the County designating parcels by Assessor's Parcel number. City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 October 30, 2003 Page 1 "CFD Administrator" means an official of the City, or designee thereof, responsible for calculating the Special Tax Requirement and providing for the levy and collection of the Special Taxes. "CFD No. 2003-1" means Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 of the City. "City" means the City of San Jacinto. "Consumer Price Index" means the Consumer Price Index published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics for "All Urban Consumers" in the Los Angeles - Anaheim - Riverside Area, measured as of the month of December in the calendar year which ends in the previous Fiscal Year. In the event this index ceases to be published, the Consumer Price Index shall be another index as determined by the CFD Administrator that is reasonably comparable to the Consumer Price Index for the City of Los Angeles. "Council" means the City Council of the City, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 2003-1. "County" means the County of Riverside. "Developed Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property for which a building permit for new construction was issued after March 1, 2003 and as of March 1 of the previous Fiscal Year. "Fiscal Year" means the period starting July 1 and ending on the following June 30. "Floor Area" for any Non -Residential Property means the total square footage of the building(s) located on such property, measured from outside wall to outside wall, exclusive of overhangs, porches, patios, carports, or similar spaces attached to the building but generally open on at least two sides. The determination of Floor Area shall be made by reference to the building permit(s) issued for such Assessor's Parcel. "Land Use Class" means any of the classes listed in Table 1 and Table 2. "Maximum Special Tax" means the Maximum Special Tax A and/or Maximum Special Tax B, as applicable. "Maximum Special Tax A" means the Maximum Special Tax A, determined in accordance with Section C.1 below, that can be levied in any Fiscal Year on any Assessor's Parcel. "Maximum Special Tax B" means the Maximum Special Tax B, determined in accordance with Section C.2 below, that can be levied on any Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property on a one-time basis, at the time a building permit for new construction is issued for such Assessor's Parcel. "Non -Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels for which a building permit(s) was issued for a non-residential use. City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 October 30, 2003 Page 2 "Non -Retail Commercial/Industrial Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property that are considered Non -Residential Property and that are not Retail Commercial Property. "Property Owner Association Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, any Assessor's Parcel within the boundaries of CFD No. 2003-1 that was owned by or irrevocably offered for dedication to a property owner association, including any master or sub -association, as of January 1 of the previous Fiscal Year. "Proportionately" means that the ratio of the actual Special Tax A levy to the Maximum Special Tax A is equal for all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property. "Public Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, (i) any property within the boundaries of CFD No. 2003-1 that was owned by or irrevocably offered for dedication to the federal government, the State, the City or any other public agency as of January 1 of the previous Fiscal Year; provided however that any property leased by a public agency to a private entity and subject to taxation under Section 53340.1 of the Act shall be taxed and classified in accordance with its use; or (ii) any property within the boundaries of CFD No. 2003-1 that was encumbered, as of January 1 of the previous Fiscal Year, by an unmanned utility easement making impractical its utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the easement. "Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property for which a building permit has been issued for purposes of constructing one or more residential dwelling units. "Retail Commercial Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Non -Residential Property for which the building permit was issued for a retail sales tax generating use or which is being used primarily for a retail sales tax generating use, as determined by the CFD Administrator. However, if the land use of an Assessor's Parcel changes, and such Assessor's Parcel no longer generates retail sales tax, such Assessor's Parcel shall no longer be considered Retail Commercial Property and shall be classified and taxed according to its use, as determined by the CFD Administrator. "Single Family Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Residential Property for which building permits have been issued for detached residential units, excluding Apartment Property. "Special Tax" means the Special Tax A and/or Special Tax B, as applicable. "Special Tax A" means the annual special tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property to fund the Special Tax Requirement. "Special Tax B" means the one-time Special Tax which is paid directly to the City at the time a building permit for new construction is issued for an Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property. City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 October 30, 2003 Page 3 "Special Tax Requirement" means that amount required in any Fiscal Year to meet the needs of CFD No. 2003-1 to: (i) pay for fire protection and suppression services (ii) pay for police protection services (iii) pay Administrative Expenses; less (iv) a credit for any funds available to reduce the annual Special Tax levy, as determined by the CFD Administrator. "State" means the State of California. "Taxable Property" means all of the Assessor's Parcels within the boundaries of CFD No. 2003-1 which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below. "Undeveloped Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property not classified as Developed Property. B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CATEGORIES Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2003-1 shall be classified as Developed Property or Undeveloped Property and shall be subject to Special Taxes in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to Section C. Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 and 2 based on the type of structure located on the Assessor's Parcel. Non -Retail Commercial/Industrial Property shall be assigned to Land Use Class 3. C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE 1. Special Tax A The Special Tax A is an annual Special Tax that shall be levied on Developed Property to fund the Special Tax Requirement. a. Developed Property (i) Maximum Special Tax A The Maximum Special Tax A for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 for each Land Use Class is shown below in Table 1. City of San Jacinto October 30, 2003 Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 Page 4 TABLE 1 Maximum Special Tax A for Developed Property For Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 Land Use Class Description Maximum Special Tax A 1 Single Family Property $350 per unit 2 Apartment Property $262.50 per unit 3 Non -Retail Commercial/Industrial Property $0.1 19 per SF of Floor Area (ii) Increase in the Maximum Special Tax A On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2004, the Maximum Special Tax A shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Year. (iii) Multiple Land Use Classes In some instances an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax that can be levied on an Assessor's Parcel shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Taxes that can be levied for all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Parcel. b. Undeveloped Property No Special Tax A shall be levied on Undeveloped Property. City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 October 30, 2003 Page 5 2. Special Tax B The Special Tax B is a one-time Special Tax that shall be paid directly to the City at the time a building permit for new construction is issued for an Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property. a. Maximum Special Tax B The Maximum Special Tax B for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 for each Land Use Class is shown below in Table 2. TABLE 2 Maximum Special Tax B For Fiscal Year 2003-2004 Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 Land Use Class Description Maximum Special Tax B 1 Single Family Property $600 per unit 2 Apartment Property $450 per unit 3 Non -Retail Commercial/Industrial Property $0.204 per SF of Floor Area b. Increase in the Maximum Special Tax B On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2004, the Maximum Special Tax B shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Year. D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX 1. Special Tax A Commencing with Fiscal Year 2003-2004 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement. The Council shall levy the Special Tax A until the amount of Special Taxes equals the Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax A as needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement. City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 October 30, 2003 Page 6 Notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax A levied against any Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten percent as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Parcel within CFD No. 2003-1. 2. Special Tax B Commencing with Fiscal Year 2003-04 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall levy the Special Tax B on each Assessor's Parcel that is subject to the Special Tax B at 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax B. The Special Tax B shall be collected by the City at the time a building permit for new construction is issued for an Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property. E. EXEMPTIONS No Special Tax shall be levied on Retail Commercial Property, Property Owner Association Property or Public Property. However, should an Assessor's Parcel no longer be classified as Retail Commercial Property, Property Owner Association Property or Public Property, its tax-exempt status will be revoked. F. APPEALS AND INTERPRETATIONS Any landowner or resident may file a written appeal of the Special Tax on his/her property with the CFD Administrator, provided that the appellant is current in his/her payments of Special Taxes. During the pendency of an appeal, all Special Taxes previously levied must be paid on or before the payment date established when the levy was made. The appeal must specify the reasons why the appellant claims the Special Tax is in error. The CFD Administrator shall review the appeal, meet with the appellant if the CFD Administrator deems necessary, and advise the appellant of its determination. If the CFD Administrator agrees with the appellant, the CFD Administrator shall eliminate or reduce the Special Tax on the appellant's property and/or provide a refund to the appellant. If the CFD Administrator disagrees with the appellant and the appellant is dissatisfied with the determination, the appellant then has 30 days in which to appeal to the Council by filing a written notice of appeal with the City Clerk, provided that the appellant is current in his/her payments of Special Taxes. The second appeal must specify the reasons for its disagreement with the CFD Administrator's determination. Interpretations may be made by the Council by ordinance or resolution for purposes of clarifying any vagueness or ambiguity in this Rate and Method of Apportionment. City of San Jacinto October 30, 2003 Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 Page 7 G. MANNER OF COLLECTION The Special Tax A shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that in Fiscal Year 2004-05 and each Fiscal Year thereafter, CFD No. 2003-1 may directly bill the Special Tax A, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations, and may covenant to foreclose and may actually foreclose on delinquent Assessor's Parcels as permitted by the Act. Commencing in Fiscal Year 2003-04, the Special Tax B shall be paid directly to the City. H. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX The Special Tax A and Special Tax B shall be levied as long as necessary to fund items (i) and (ii) of the Special Tax Requirement. K:\Clients2\San Jacinto\Mello\Police&Fire CFD\RMA\servicesrma9.doc City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 October 30, 2003 Page 8 EXHIBIT B CITY OF JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX A FOR DEVELOPED PROPERTY Land Use Class Description Fiscal Year 2003-04 Maximum Special Tax A [1] 1 Single Family Property $350.00 per unit 2 Apartment Property $262.50 per unit 3 Non -Retail Commercial/Industrial Property $0.119 per SF of Floor Area [1] On each July 1, commencing July 1, 2004, the Maximum Special Tax A for Developed Property shall be increased by the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6.00%) and a minimum increase of two percent (2.00%) of the amount in effect in the previous Fiscal Year. EXHIBIT C CITY OF JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX B Land Use Class Description Fiscal Year 2003-04 Maximum Special Tax B [1] 1 Single Family Property $600.00 per unit 2 Apartment Property $450.00 per unit 3 Non -Retail Commercial/Industrial Property $0.204 per SF of Floor Area [1] On each July 1, commencing July 1, 2004, the Maximum Special Tax B for property where a building permit has been issued shall be increased by the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6.00%) and a minimum increase of two percent (2.00%) of the amount in effect in the previous Fiscal Year. EXHIBIT D CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 BOUNDARY MAP SHEET 1 OF 2 Assessor Parcel Numbers within the Amended Boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 2003-1: 431-020-007 431-040-026 431-040-027 433-030-001 433-030-002 431-050-018 431-050-024 431-100-002 431-100-007 431-100-014 431-160-006 thru 431-160-009 431-180-018 431-180-020 431-180-021 431-180-061 431-190-019 431-190-020 431-190-021 431-190-024 431-410-003 thru 431-410-015 434-160-009 434-160-010 434-300-002 434-300-011 434-300-012 434-300-013 435-240-021 AMENDED BOUNDARIES OF CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STATE OF CALIFORNIA This map amends the proposed boundary map for City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1, County of Riverside, State of California, prior recorded at Book 55 of Maps and Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Page 2-3, as instrument No. 2003-817116, on October 17, 2003 in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California. (1) Fled in the office of the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto this day of 2003. (3) Filed this day of 2003, at the hour of o'clock _m, in Book of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Dorothy Chouinard, San Jacinto City Clerk Districts at page and as Instrument No. in the office of the County Recorder of Riverside County, State of California. (2) I hereby certify that the within map showing the amended boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 2003-1, Riverside County, State of Califomia, was approved by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on this day of 2003, by its Resolution No. Dorothy Chouinard, San Jacinto City Clerk Prepared by David Toussig do Associates. Inc. Fee County Recorder of Riverside County Reference Is hereby made to the Assessor maps of the County of Riverside for an exact description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel. SHEET 2 OF 2 Ramona Exwy Private Rd % Scott St c a W / U AMENDED BOUNDARIES OF CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Record Rd urcro an Cottonwood Ave 7Ih Street G,-16G-OBI Esplanade w-m .010 Bergin St Shaver St Commonwe Washington Ave LEGEND Amended Boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 Waterway Assessor Parcel Number w.300.011 2nd St E Evans St AGENDA ITEM 4. I February 5, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer SUBJECT: Traffic Calming Improvements, placement and Installation of Speed Humps along Warwick Street, Roanoke Street, Serena Court and Savory Lane and standards for traffic calming improvements RECOMMENDATION: By motion approve the policy recommended by the Council Transportation Sub - Committee and authorize installation of speed humps on Warwick Street, Roanoke Street, Serena Court, and Savory Lane. BACKGROUND: At the regular Council meeting of December 4, 2003, staff was directed to meet with Council's Transportation Sub -Committee (Mayor Ayres and Vice Mayor Buydos). On January 12, 2004, the Council Sub -Committee reviewed the speed hump requests and standards previously reviewed by Council and made the following recommendations: o Speed humps and other traffic calming improvements may be considered by City Council and implemented subject to compliance with all the following criteria: A. 51% of residents along the proposed street must sign and submit a petition requesting installation of traffic calming improvements B. Traffic calming improvement shall be considered only within existing residential developments (with speed limits of 25 MPH) with curb to curb improvements not to exceed 40' (one lane in each direction C. The length of the streets shall be at minimum of 800' and shall not be a cul-de-sac ?cFrT3e._ City Manager: Finance Director: Page 1 of 2 D. The residential street shall not fall within established transit and emergency routes E. Street grades shall not exceed 5% F. Sight distance shall be evaluated and considered G. The City Council shall review and consider the installation of traffic calming devices o The Sub -Committee also recommends that the Council authorize installation of speed humps at the following locations: A. Warwick Street between Kirby and Camden Road B. Roanoke between Kirby and Camden Road C. Serena Lane between Calle San Sebastian to Cortina Drive E. Savory Lane between De Anza and Ramona Boulevard JUSTIFICATION: Enhance safety and reduce speeding along residential streets. BUDGETARY IMPACT: No funds are currently allocated in FY 2003-04. The Council Sub -Committee recommends that appropriate funds from development agreement funds be set aside and reflected on mid -year adjustments - estimated cost $40,000. The City Manager continues to recommend to the Council that the development agreement fee money only be used for supporting the deficit spending that currently exists in the General Fund. City Manager recommends that the Council use non -general fund money for these purposes, such as Measure "A." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Speed Hump Design 2. Locations for Proposed Speed Hump Installation Page 2 of 2 SPEED HUMPS AND TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES FOR THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA r O M• r6rvi� ti SECTION A -A CURB FACE j_ TACK CONCRETE COAT yI Z w� > 12" MIN w f 36" MAX GUTTER ROADWAY rr2' .(CENTERLINE of ADVANCE --.--- ' WARNING SIGN -1� c Ex. C& - - 100' TYP. 3 '2 12' ADVANCE WARNING f SIGN EX. 4_;= 11fPAVEMENT SZatCQ PLAN VIEW 12" REFLECTIVE WHITE CHEVRONS W 37 (MODIFIED) MPH 7' 1-3/4" TSPAR, OR EQUAL, POST WITH 2" BASE ADVANCE WARNING SIGN W 6(15 SPEED HUMPS AND TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES FOR THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA gr � — 1 n ta- -a N N N ti SECTION A -A mg Z > 12" MIN og a /r 36" MAX U L.— TACK CONCRETE COAT GUTTER ROADWAY ��2' CCENTERLINE f L/ 8' 1 100' i TYP. 12' S r .EX. C&G 1 —� PAVEMENT aL ADVANCE W RNE G ~�- EX. C&G A+ ADVANCE wARNII;iG SIGN 4-1 arm 12" REFLECTIVE WHITE CHEVRONS PLAN VIEW W 37 (MODIFIED) W 6,(15) 7r 1-3/4" TELESPAR, TOR EQUAL, POST - WITH 2" BASE ,ADVANCE WARNING SIGN ZIP 32567 ass s 02033 Directory 8 Maps USA, Inc. NI ROhls Reserved City of $an Jacinto aEFLECIION STONEY MOUNTAIN RANCH ZIP 92545 pL Vier ZIP 92582 Ff x..I.Awe �cyyxe' irrir Bolded W er Co. Pal *Call Home and O. Independent Distri6ub Seeing Hanel/Son looMo Volley Since 1983 1800/444-Pute 11731 Vets Ma8 Boa 350 C / df eN 1 b R ie.� ✓M q ..—..AAr ma . 1 f rrA•xvxe.m+r,. e{ E q Of COMMERCE P SOBOBA HOT µy SPRINGS 81 Home Equity Ron Lansing idacte hkr!gage I ICC East Florida t r rM. CA RirE4: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PARK HILL ZP T 61 n.. cn.rnon AGENDA ITEM -4.c February 5, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jim Barron, Fire Chief 9Q SUBJECT: Fire Department's Recommended Site Plan for Future Fire Stations needed to serve the City at build -out RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Fire Department's revised site plan proposal for future fire stations needed to serve the City at build -out. An additional recommendation as to staffing needs for each fire station is also provided for Council consideration. Direct staff to bring back a detailed zone map with assessor's parcel numbers (APNs) and a recommended site for a new fire station in the vicinity of Sanderson Avenue and Cottonwood Avenue. BACKGROUND: The City Manager directed the Fire Department to prepare a Plan to identify our City's future fire stations and staffing needs to stay abreast of development of development in the City. Council reviewed an initial Plan presented at its December 18, 2003 meeting; however, requested that additional information be taken into consideration. In particular, Council wished to have the Plan illustrate future major roadways and the impacts of the Highway 79 realignment. During our Growth Workshop held in February, 2003, Council was briefed by staff as to our inability to provide adequate emergency response times to the west end of the City where extensive subdivision development is in the current planning stages. The Fire Department identified five (5) minutes as the desired maximum response time. This is particularly critical in life-saving rescues/medical-aids and extinguishment of structure fires prior to the flashover stage. City Manager: pprova Finance Director: Page 1 of 3 With this response goal in mind, staff recommends the following future fire station sites and staffing: Station Location Staffing 1 Sanderson Avenue and engine company Cottonwood Avenue 2 Hewitt Avenue and relocate Engine 25 Esplanade Avenue crew / future truck company 3 4 State Street north of engine company Ramona Expressway Ramona Expressway engine company and and Cawston Avenue truck company Staff also recommends that a dedicated Battalion Chief / Fire Marshal position be created when the third fire station comes on line. This position will assure proper personnel supervision, emergency management and fire protection planning overview for the City. The above recommendations were prepared taking into consideration National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards and the Riverside County Fire Department's Goals and Objectives for Emergency Services Delivery for Unincorporated Areas. JUSTIFICATION: This Plan allows the City to better prepare for future fire station and staffing needs, as well as the associated costs. Identifying these potential expenses now will help to structure our newly created Public Safety CFD. BUDGETARY IMPACT: At current dollars, the staffing costs would be as follows: Cost per engine Cost per ladder truck Cost per battalion chief $901,995 $1,032,171 $150,000 Page 2 of 3 Staffs experience as to costs associated with constructing a fire station is approximately $1.2 million, excluding land acquisition. Additionally, a fully - equipped fire engine currently costs approximately $350,000 and a ladder truck is $850,000. ATTACHMENTS: Map — City of San Jacinto Future Roadways / Hwy. 79 Realignment "Response Study for Proposed San Jacinto City Fire Stations" Page 3 of 3 Future Bridge Future Interchange Ramona Cajalco Corridor Limited Access Highway Collector u,.LCC wo1A co. oov Arterial Urban Arterial Major Secondary City Limits Roadway RESPONSE STUDY FOR PROPOSED SAN JACINTO CITY FIRE STATIONS Bina rI4 rorpos ocation or In ustrial Fire Station Arida ���Proposed Location for Cottonwood Fire Station 1 1 Inch equals 1.163809 miles Legend Future Interchange Future Bridge Proposed Location for College Fire Station y, Proposed Location for New Downtown Fire Station ?1,4„..io-11°'-eliAtillri,i Ildl� .T�� im �kF,IIIg:iIIii111Ir - I..: w ■memv i' • s, l a ��1•11■1IMI1 �IIIIIIIIIiNIMIP1111il htr®2 .ME, 11111 _do II alc, Lu=_ ^J 'ialiniu AGENDA ITEM 4.3 February 5, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer SUBJECT: Traffic Reports — Intersections of State Street and Idyllwild Drive, and Chase Street, and Main Street Surveys RECOMMENDATION: By motion: 1) adopt traffic report dated October 28, 2003 for intersection of State Street and Idyllwild Drive; 2) adopt traffic report dated November 10, 2003 for Main Street between Sheriff Avenue and Ramona Expressway; 3) adopt traffic report dated January 23, 2004 for Chase Street at Cypress and Sagecrest Drive; and 4) authorize implementation of recommendations as presented in the reports. BACKGROUND: The City Council at a regular meeting directed staff to prepare and submit various traffic reports, including consideration for traffic calming and stop signs along Main Street, signal and other improvements at intersection of Idyllwild Drive and State Street. In addition to these reports, staff also requested update of speed surveys and review of speed and stop sign warrants along Chase Street north of Ramona Expressway. App City Manager: Finance Director: Page 1 of 3 The enclosed traffic reports are prepared by City's consulting traffic engineer (RK Engineering Group, Inc.). Mr. Kahn will be present at the Council meeting to assist with the review of the reports and respond to questions. The following are summary of findings of the individual reports: o State Street and Idyllwild Drive — Page 4 and Exhibits "D" and "E" of the reports identify options available to prohibit left turn movements from Idyllwild Drive. The report recommends future signalization and speed reduction along State Street. Staffs recommendation is to implement Exhibit "E." o Main Street Traffic Calming- Pages 4 and 5 and Exhibits "D" and "E" of the report identifies the recommended 4-way stop sign installation at intersection of Main Street with Sheriff Street, and Mistletoe and Hewitt Avenue, to be implemented along with Main Street Pavement Rehabilitation, which is scheduled to start early Summer 2004. o Chase Street — Refer to pages 5 and 6 and Exhibit "D" of the report, recommending 4-way stop sign installation at intersection of Chase Street with Cypress and Sagecrest Drive. City wide speed survey will be submitted to Council at letter date. A full copy of the reports is available at City Clerk's office for Council's review. JUSTIFICATION: Enhance and improve safety and reduce accident rates. BUDGETARY IMPACT: An estimated $35,000 will be needed to offset the implementation of the traffic engineer recommendations for the above mentioned intersections. The Transportation Sub -Committee recommended the utilization of development agreement funds to offset the cost of these improvements. The City Manager continues to recommend to the Council that the development agreement fee money only be used for supporting the deficit spending that currently exists in the General Fund. City Manager recommends that the Council use non -general fund money for these purposes, such as Measure "A." Page 2 of 3 ATTACHMENTS: 1. State Street (SR-79) at Idyl!wild Drive Traffic Study dated October 28, 2003 (partial report) 2. Main Street Traffic Review and Traffic Calming Devices dates November 10, 2003 (partial report) 3. Chase Street at Cypress Drive and Sagecrest Drive All -Way Stop Dated January 23, 2004 (partial report) Page 3 of 3 STATE STREET (SR-79) AT IDYLLWILD DRIVE INTERSECTION REVIEW San Jacinto, California engineering group, inc. engineering group, inc. October 28, 2003 CITY OF SAN JACINTO c/o Mr. Habib Motlagh TRI-LAKE CONSULTANTS, INC. 170 Wilkerson Avenue, Suite D Perris, CA 92570-2200 transportation planning • traffic engineering acoustical / air quality studies Subject: State Street (SR-79) at Idyllwild Drive Intersection Review Dear Mr. Motlagh: Introduction RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) is pleased to submit this review of the State Street (SR-79) at Idyllwild Drive intersection in the City of San Jacinto. The analysis location is shown in Exhibit A. Since State Street (SR-79) is a State Highway, the intersection is controlled to a substantial extent by the State. The purpose of this analysis is to develop recommendations to further improve current operations at this intersection. The analysis will determine existing conditions, and whether or not a traffic signal is warranted at the intersection of State Street (SR-79) at Idyllwild Drive based upon existing conditions. Also, a review of accidents has been conducted for this intersection and recommended improvements are suggested in the recommendations section of this report. This review will include potential access restrictions for Idyllwild Drive at its intersection with State Street (SR-79) and the warrants for a traffic signal. Existing Conditions Exhibit B illustrates the existing geometric condition at the intersection of State Street (SR-79) at Idyllwild Drive. State Street (SR-79) is a four -lane roadway with a striped median at its intersection with Idyllwild Drive. Idyllwild Drive is a two-lane undivided roadway, which intersects State Street (SR-79) at a significant angle. The intersection is stop controlled along Idyllwild Drive in the eastbound and westbound directions. The State Street (SR-79) approaches are not controlled at this time. However, a traffic signal exists at the intersection of State Street (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway located approximately 700 feet north of the 20201 s.w. birch street, suite 250 newport beach, california 92660 tel 949.474.0809 fax 949.474.0902 hip://www.rkengineer.com intersection. An advance -warning flasher is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of State Street (SR-79) at Idyllwild Drive. Photographs of the existing intersection are shown in Appendix A. This includes photographs from each of the four approaches at the intersection. Existing traffic volumes for the study area intersection are shown in Exhibit C. The traffic and pedestrian count sheets are included in Appendix B. Hourly approach traffic counts are tabulated in Table 1. Existing lane configurations at the intersection are shown in Exhibit B. The posted speed limit on State Street (SR-79) north of Idyllwild Drive is 50 mph and 40 mph south of the intersection. The posted speed limit on Idyllwild Drive is 25 mph. Based upon a recent speed survey, the 85th percentile speed on State Street north of Idyllwild Drive is 46 mph, and 50 mph south of Idyllwild Drive. The speed limit north of Idyllwild Drive is somewhat higher than what is indicated by the 85th percentile speed, and the speed limit south of Idyllwild Drive has lower than what is indicated by the 85th percentile speed. State Street is considered a rural street for the purposes of the traffic signal warrants and an all - way stop analysis, because the speeds are over 40 mph. The speed survey worksheets are included in Appendix C. Accident reports were provided by the San Jacinto Police Department (see Appendix D). These statistics are summarized and presented in Table 2, based upon the following formula: Accidents per No. of Accidents * 32,877 Million Vehicles = ADT * No. of Months According to the San Jacinto Police Department records, there have been five (5) accidents during Year 2003, three (3) accidents during Year 2002 and two (2) accidents during Year 2001. As shown in Table 2, the calculated accident rate for the study intersection is higher than the expected rate for similar types of intersections. Vehicles are currently exceeding the speed limit on the port of this roadway south of Idyllwild Drive and also making turning movements that are conflicting with through movement. The intersection of State Street (SR-79) and Idyllwild Drive has been evaluated for a traffic signal using Caltrans eleven (11) traffic signal warrants criteria. The following warrant criteria are applicable to the existing traffic conditions: Warrant No. Description 1 Minimum Vehicle Volume Interruption of Continuous Traffic 6 Minimum Pedestrian Volume School Crossings Accident Experience Systems 2 Warrant No. Description 8 Combination of Warrants 9 Four -Hour Volume 10 Peak Hour Delay 11 Peak Hour Volume Since the 85th percentile vehicle speed on State Street (SR-79) is over 40 miles per hour, the intersection of State Street (SR-79) at Idyllwild has been evaluated using rural area condition criteria. The intersection of State Street (SR-79) and Idyllwild Drive currently does meet four (4) of the warrants for a traffic signal based upon the Caltrans warrant analysis. In addition, the accident Warrant 6 is met, except that less restrictive changes have not been made yet at the intersection to improve the accident experience. The following warrants have been met at this time: Warrant 1, Minimum Vehicle Volume - No (80%) Warrant 2, interruption of Continuous Traffic - Yes Warrant 6, Accident Experience — Yes (except less restrictive measures than a traffic signal have not been taken) Warrant 8, Combination of Warrants - Yes Warrant 9, Four -Hour Volume - Yes Warrant 11, Peak Hour Volume - Yes Since there is a substantial difference in traffic volumes on State Street (SR-79), which has an 18,000 to 20,000 ADT in comparison to Idyllwild Drive which has a traffic volume of 1,000 to 2,600 ADT. All -way stop warrants would not be met at this intersection due to the substantial difference in volumes between the north/south and east/west approaches. Conclusions Based upon the analysis, the intersection of State Street (SR-79) at Idyllwild Drive does have a higher Accident Experience than what would be expected at similar intersections. This is probably caused by the substantial angle that Idyllwild Drive intersects State Street (SR-79). it is difficult for vehicles making eastbound or westbound left turns or going through the intersections to actually see the northbound and southbound vehicles on State Street (SR-79). Even though the traffic signal warrants have been met at this intersection, it is recommended due to the proximity of the intersection to Ramona Express Way, less restrictive measures be taken first to see if they can improve the safety at the intersection. This could include modifications to the signing/striping, turning movement and/or through movement restrictions in the east/west direction. Furthermore, the City may pursue with Caltrans lowering the speed limit north of Idyllwild Drive on State Street (SR-79). Recommendations The following recommendations are suggested for this intersection: 1. Install temporal channelization to restrict access at the intersection. There are two options that are available: Option A (Exhibit D) would include a "worm" median to prohibit east/west through and left turn movements on Idyllwild Drive at its intersection with State Street (SR-79). A conceptual layout of this recommendation is included in Exhibit D. Option B (Exhibit E) would limit the east/west approaches to right turns only by the use of raised channelization islands. Either of the two options would prevent the improvements, which are involved in the current accidents at the intersection. 2. Discuss with Caltrans installing a traffic signal at the intersection. 3. Request Caltrans to reduce the speed limit on State Street north of Idyllwild Drive based upon the recent speed survey. 4. Continue to provide additional police enforcement at the intersection to discourage illegal through or turning movements once the access restrictions are implemented. RK is pleased to provide this intersection review for the intersection of State Street (SR-79) at Idyllwild Drive. If you have any questions regarding this analysis or need further review information, please do not hesitate to call me at (949) 474-0809. Sincerely, RK ENGINEERING GROUP VC Robert Kahn, P.E. Principal Attachments 'C A c e. S T 4.5 RK: rd/RK 1891. doc 4 JN: 0328-03-03 Exhibits i N 0328-03-03 (ExA) • = Study Area Intersection STATE STREET (SR-79) AT IDYLLWILD DRIVE INTERSECTION REVIEW, San Jacinto, Califomia Exhibit A Location Map CE103 engineering group, inc. • = Study Area Intersection 0328-03-03 (ExA) STATE STREET (SR-79) AT IDYLLWILD DRIVE INTERSECTION REVIEW, San Jacinto, Califomia Exhibit A Location Map fini engineering group, inc. 0328-03-03(Ex13) (TO RAMONA EXPRESSWAY) EXIST. 'Cr EXIST SW (TYPICAL) EXIST. C/C (TYPICAL) N. STATE STREET II II I II I II 13' 15' 14' 13' 1 5' 0 Xn T EXIST. 'SIGNAL AHEAD FLASHING BEACON (REF.) EXIST..C7' EXIST. 'RI' Exhibit B Existing Conditions STATE STREET (SR-79) AT IDYLLWILD DRIVE INTERSECTION REVIEW, San Jacinto, California �ry RI( engineering group, inc. Exhibit C Existing Traffic Volumes and Speeds Legend: Ramona Exwy. 21,712 = Average Daily Traffic (2-Way) 110,8561 = Average Daily Traffic (One -Way) 46 MPH I __ 38-47 MP N 0328-03-03 (EXC) 85th % Speed 10 MPH Pace Speed STATE STREET (SR-79) AT IDYLLWILD DRIVE INTERSECTION REVIEW, San Jacinto, California R1t engineering group, inc. EXIST. EP (TYPICAL) EXIST. 'R1' EXIST. 'G7' EXIST SW (TYPICAL) EXIST. C/G (TYPICAL) (TO RAMONA EXPRESSWAY) 1 I C — I F I II at.k_ II 111 I II • I II 111 ,,.1N, N. STATE STREET N 0328-03-03 (ExD) t IIL II II 2111 II II II 11 13' 15' 14' 13' 2' WIOE PCC MEOIAN EXIST. 'SIGNAL MEAD' FLASHING BEACON (REF.) EXIST. '07' EXIST. 'Rt' Exhibit D Access Option "A" STATE STREET (5R-79) AT IDYLLWILD DRIVE INTERSECTION REVIEW, San Jacinto, California ♦ti engineering group, inc. EXIST. EP (TYPICAL) EXIST. 'RI' EXIST. '07' EXIST SW- (TYP) EXIST. (TYPICAL) (O RAMONA EXPRESSWAY) III ,II 1 6 II.; � I I Ft 1111 A); \ I I,N \ I 1L II� \ I Raised P.y.. T/ed;an II III II N. STATE STREET 13' 15' 14 113' EXIST. 'SIGNAL AHEAD' FLASIINC BEACON (REF.) EXIST. 'G7' EXIST. 'RI' (1YPIGI.) n\ tt 1 \\� ``( 0,,6 Exhibit E Access Option "B" Raised P.C.C. Median NEM CET 29 () 0328-03-03 (ExE) STATE STREET (SR-79) AT IDYLLWILD DRIVE INTERSECTION REVIEW, San Jacinto, California 111/1 engineering group, inc. S San 5 Jacinto Ave co .o vib .Q N San Jacinto Sheriff Ave. Ave. Jordan Ave Alessandro Ave. Mistletoe Ave. Hewitt Ave. Vernon Ave m m 5 Camino Los Banos St. z engineering group, inc. transportation planning • traffic engineering acoustical / air quality studies November 10, 2003 CITY OF SAN JACINTO c/o Mr. Habib Motlagh TRI-LAKE CONSULTANTS, INC. 170 Wilkerson Avenue, Suite D Perris, CA 92570-2200 Subject: Main Street Traffic Review and Traffic Calming, City of San Jacinto Dear Mr. Motlagh: Introduction RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) is pleased to submit this review of traffic conditions and traffic calming for Main Street in the City of San Jacinto. The analysis locations are shown in Exhibit A. The traffic review will focus on the following intersections: North -South Street East-West Street Sheriff Avenue Main Street Mistletoe Avenue Main Street Hewitt Avenue Main Street Camino Los Banos Street Main Street In addition, RK will review potential traffic calming measures along Main Street to help slow traffic down. The purpose of this analysis is to review recommendations to evaluate the study area intersections for all -way stop traffic signals and to determine traffic calming measures, which could be implemented along Main Street east of Sheriff Avenue. The analysis will determine existing conditions, and whether or not all -way stop controls are warranted at the study area intersections. Speed surveys, traffic counts and a review of accidents have been conducted for these intersections and recommended improvements are suggested in the recommendation section of this report. The traffic study will look at potential implementation of all -way stop control at the study area intersections, especially with respect to protecting existing crosswalks, which cross Main Street. 20201 s.w. birch street, suite 250 newport beach, california 92660 tel 949.474.0809 fax 949.474.0902 http://www.rkengineer.com Photographs taken along Main Street are included in Appendix A. The photographs at Sheriff Avenue and Main Street were taken during the reconstruction of Main Street, which has subsequently been paved and is currently open to traffic. Sketches of the existing study area intersections are included in Appendix B. Main Street is an east -west two-lane roadway between Sheriff Avenue and Ramona Expressway. It has a width varying from approximately 24 feet in the downtown area to approximately 50 feet in the area east of Jordan Avenue. The study area intersections are currently controlled by stop signs in a north -south direction. No stop signs or traffic signals control east -west movements along Main Street. As previously noted, photographs of the intersections are shown in Appendix A. These include photographs from each of the four (4) approaches at the intersection. The downtown area photographs depicts the roadway prior to the completion of improvements, which are now completed. Existing traffic volumes for the study area intersections are shown in Exhibit B. The traffic and pedestrian count sheets are included in Appendix C. Hourly approach traffic counts are tabulated in Tables 1 to 4. The existing lane configurations at the intersections are shown in Appendix B. The posted speed limit on Main Street is 40 miles per hour. Based upon a recent speed survey, the 85th percentile speed on Main Street east of Sheriff Avenue is 39 miles per hour, and east of Hewitt Avenue is 44 miles per hour. Main Street is considered an Urban Street for purposes of traffic signal warrants and all -way stop analysis at those locations where the speeds are less than 40 miles per hour. Where speeds exceeded 40 miles per hour it is considered rural conditions. The speed survey worksheets are included in Appendix D. Accident reports were provided by the San Jacinto Police Department (see Appendix E). These statistics are summarized and presented in Table 5, based upon the following formula: Accidents per No. of Accidents * 32.877 Million Vehicles = ADT * No. of Months According to the San Jacinto Police Department records, there have been no accidents during the years of 1999 to 2001 at the intersection of Sheriff Avenue at Main Street, 2 accidents in the vicinity of Mistletoe Avenue at Main Street, 2 accidents at the intersection of Hewitt Avenue at Main Street, and there have been no accidents at the intersection of Camino Los Banos at Main Street. As shown in Table 5, the calculated accident rates for the study area intersections are lower than the expected rate for similar type of intersections, except for the Main Street intersection of Hewitt Avenue. Traffic signal warrants at the four (4) study area intersections were reviewed with respect to Caltrans average daily traffic and peak hour traffic signal warrants. At the present time the four (4) study area intersections do not meet the average daily traffic or peak hour warrants for traffic signals based upon Caltrans' criteria, although the intersection of Hewitt Avenue at Main Street is very close to meeting the peak hour warrant. The four (4) study area intersections have also been reviewed with respect to all -way stop control warrants. Based upon the MUTCD (Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices) criteria, the only intersection which meets all -way stop warrants is the intersection of Hewitt Avenue at Main Street. However, for purposes of controlling traffic in the vicinity of the 2 existing crosswalks, protecting pedestrian crossing, and because of the type of adjacent land uses, all -way stop control is recommended at the following intersections: North -South Street East-West Street Sheriff Avenue Main Street Mistletoe Avenue Main Street Hewitt Avenue Main Street Although it is not a study area intersection, an all -way stop control is also recommended for the intersection of Jordan Avenue at Main Street. The reason for this all -way stop is because of the potential for high pedestrian activity in the downtown area and the intersection is the transition point from the section of Main Street with the two-way left -turn median to the downtown area, which includes chokers and angle parking. Traffic Calming Opportunity A number of traffic calming techniques are available to control vehicle speeds and traffic volumes along the Main Street. A summary of the traffic calming opportunities are included in Exhibit C, and could include such items as follows: • Chokers • Speed humps • Chicanes • Diagonal diverters • Semi diverters • Roundabouts • Bulbouts • Pavement texture • Rumble strips • Striping As a long-term objective, it may be desirable to continue the angle chokers/parking, which have been implemented in the downtown area. This represents relatively high cost capital improvement that potentially could be extended to the east as funds become available. As a near -term solution, striping could be implemented to narrow the wider sections of Main Street east of Jordan Avenue. Main Street east of Jordan Avenue has a curb -to -curb width of approximately 50 feet. The area shown in Exhibit D indicates where the existing 50-foot curb -to -curb section of Main Street could be narrowed through striping to provide a two-way left turn striped median and one (1) travel lane in each direction. In addition, white 4" edge lines could be painted parallel to the curb where parallel parking could occur. The Main Street typical striping concept in this area is shown in Exhibit E. This shows a typical condition, which provides an 11-foot striped median two 12-foot travel lanes and a 7.5-foot curbside -parking lane. This striping concept would reduce the perceived width of the 3 roadway to drivers; therefore, potentially reducing traffic speeds from what currently occurs in the wider sections of Main Street. The striping traffic calming technique is a measure that could be implemented at a relative low cost without reconstructing the existing curb and gutter, rather than the textured pavement and other improvements, which have previously been implemented in downtown San Jacinto. The downtown San Jacinto concept of chokers and angle parking could be implemented to the east as funds become available. Conclusions Based upon this analysis, additional traffic control devices (i.e. all -way stop) are recommended at some of the study area intersections, as noted on Exhibit D. Even though two of these intersections do not warrant an all -way stop control from a volume standpoint, there are other factors which indicate they would be desirable in this particular area. In addition, the revised striping concept could be implemented along Main Street from Jordan Avenue to Camino Las Ramblas that would provide for a two-way striped left turn median and one (1) traffic lane in each direction with a white edge line within the parking area. Furthermore, in the future, the City of San Jacinto could pursue implementation of choker and angle parking as has been implemented in the Downtown area further to the east as capital funds become available. Recommendations The following recommendations are suggested for these intersections: 1. Install all -way stop signs, stop bars, stop legends, and advance warning signs on Main Street at the intersections of Sheriff Avenue and Main Street, Mistletoe Avenue and Main Street and Hewitt Avenue at Main Street. Also, install an all -way stop control at the intersection of Jordan Avenue at Main Street. All installations should follow Caltrans design requirements and advance warning signs should be posted in advance of each intersection along with appropriate pedestrian crossing warning signs. 2. Implement revised striping as conceptually shown in Exhibit E for Main Street east of Jordan Avenue which would include a striped two-way left turn median, one (1) 12-foot traffic lane in each direction, and white edge lines parallel to the existing curb at the edge of the parking lane. This would extend to the point where Main Street narrows to less than 50 feet east of Camino Los Banos Street. Transitions from the two-way left turn medians to a double yellow centerline stripe will need to be provided approaching Jordan Avenue and Camino Los Banos Street on Main Street. 3. Develop a long-term program to implement the choker and angle parking design that has been implemented in Downtown San Jacinto further to the east as funding becomes available. Ms, -' s i i►ex 1 4 4. Continue to monitor traffic conditions within the study area to determine the effectiveness of the improvements that are implemented. RK is pleased to provide this review of Main Street in the City of San Jacinto. If you have any questions regarding this analysis or need further review of this information, please do not hesitate to call me at (949Y 474-0809. Sincerely, RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. Robert Kahn, P.E. Principal Attachments RK: rd/RK 1953.doc JN:0328-03-02 Exhibits 0 4. c U duoco Od c 40 fa W Main St. N 0328-03-02-EX_A ai 0 c U W7thSt. ' m 0 • Mistletoe Ave. ai c 0 • Hewitt Ave. 1 st St. E Main St. E 7 th St. • Exhibit A Location Map god c 0 to MAIN STREET TRAFFIC REVIEW , San Jacinto, California LEGEND: • = Study Area Intersections an engineering group, inc. W Main St. 39 MPH 30-39 MPH 0 Exhibit B Existing Traffic Volumes and Speeds 1 st Si E Main St. 5,772 0 0 c W7thSt. 0328-03-02-EX_B to to 5,924 6,576 rn 6,568 > zm \ 4,624 44 MPH 34-43 MPH Camino Los Banos St. cc a .f0e \,a E 7 th St. 5,420 Legend: 2,286 = Average Daily Traffic 39 MPH _ 30-39 MPHI 85th % Speed 10 MPH 'ace Speed MAIN STREET TRAFFIC REVIEW , San Jacinto, California RI( • engineering group, Inc. i 0328-03-02-EX_C Exhibit C Typical Traffic Calming Devics Speed humps SOURCE: CIVIL ENGINEERING, MAGAZINE, JANUARY 2000 MAIN STREET TRAFFIC REVIEW , San Jacinto, Califomia RK engineering group, inc. N 0328-03-02-EX_D Q 0 W7thSt. a) N w 2 1 st St. E Main St. E 7 th St. Camino Los Banos St. Exhibit D Recommendations t0 to Legend: O$ = All Way Stop = Paint Two -Way Striped Median (Detail 32) and Right Edge Lines (Detail 278) (See Exhibit D) * * = Paint Transition Strippin from Two -Way Left Turn Median (Detail 32) to double Yellow Stripe (Detail 22) MAIN STREET TRAFFIC REVIEW , San Jacinto, California Rat engineering group, inc. Exhibit E Main Street Typical Striping Concept R-1 dOlS T sr NOTES: See Appendix G for Caltrans Marking Standards. 0328-03-02-EX_E Side Street (Typical) STOP Main Street CURB LINE CURB LINE R-1 CONSTRUCTION NOTES OPaint Caltrans Detail 32 (Two -Way Left Turn Lane) O Paint Caltrans Detail 27B (White 4" Right Edge Line) MAIN STREET TRAFFIC REVIEW San Jacinto, California Rlt engineering group, inc. CHASE STREET AT CYPRESS DRIVE AND SAGECREST DRIVE ALL -WAY STOP REVIEW (01/23/04) San Jacinto, California engineering group, inc. engineering group, inc. January 23, 2004 CITY OF SAN JACINTO c/o Mr. Habib Motlagh TRI-LAKE CONSULTANTS, INC. 170 Wilkerson Avenue, Suite D Perris, CA 92570-2200 transportation planning • traffic engineering acoustical / air quality studies Subject: Chase Street at Cypress Drive and Sagecrest Drive All -Way Stop Review (Revised) Dear Mr. Motlagh: Introduction RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) is pleased to submit this review of the Chase Street at Cypress Drive and Sagecrest Drive intersections in the City of San Jacinto. The analysis locations are shown in Exhibit A. The purpose of this analysis is to develop recommendations to further improve current operations at these intersections. The analysis will determine existing conditions, and whether or not all -way stops are warranted at the intersections along Chase Street based upon existing conditions. Also, a review of accidents and a speed survey along Chase Street has been conducted for these intersections and recommended improvements are suggested in the recommendations section of this report. Existing Conditions The study intersections are located in a residential community in the City of San Jacinto. Chase Street is a north -south residential collector street that connects the neighborhood to Ramona Expressway to the south of the study intersections. Chase Street dead -ends approximately 500 feet north of Sagecrest Drive, which is also an outlet street connecting the neighborhood to State Street east of the study intersection. The location map can be seen in Exhibit A. Photographs taken for the study area are attached in Appendix A. These include photographs taken from each of the approaches at the intersections. The School District is constructing a new elementary school south of Sagecrest Drive and west of State Street. The intersection of Chase Street and Cypress Drive is stopped controlled along Cypress Drive in the eastbound and westbound directions, whereas, Chase Street and Sagecrest Drive is stopped controlled along Chase Street in the northbound and southbound directions. 20201 s.w. birch street, suite 250 newport beach, california 92660 tel 949.474.0809 fax 949.474.0902 http://www.rkengineer.com Newport Drive intersects Chase Street between the Cypress Drive and Sagecrest Drive intersections. This T-intersection is stopped controlled on Newport Drive in the westbound direction. Chase Street has a curb -to -curb width of approximately 44 feet allowing for parking on both sides of the street. Parking was observed on the streets, isolated, mainly, in front of the homes. The streets do not have any pavement markings, except for stop lines and stop markings at the stop -controlled locations. Exhibit B shows the existing traffic control and the number of travel lanes for the study area. There is roadway lighting on each of the streets but are not necessary located at the intersections. All of the roadways have sidewalks and are located on both sides of the streets. There were not any signs, within the study area, indicating the speed limit or indicating any parking restrictions. The overall condition of the pavement, striping, and sidewalks is good. It is also worth noting that a new school will be opening within a few blocks of the study area in the next year. This new school would mostly likely increase the number of vehicle and pedestrian volumes when opened. However, this review of the two intersections does not take into account the additional traffic from the school, but it is considered in the overall recommendations. All -Way Stop Review The study intersections were reviewed to see whether the intersections warrant an all -way stop control using two different methodologies: the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices' (MUTCD) warrant method and an alternative method published in the ITE WesterniTE commonly used in the San Francisco Bay Area for neighborhood streets. Both of these warrant analyses worksheets can be found in Appendix D. Both of the methodologies are used as guidelines to determine if an intersection warrants an all -way stop. The procedure quantifies the recommendation using a list of criteria in which one or more of the criteria must be met. RK gathered information of the existing conditions including: traffic volumes, a speed survey, and field observations to fulfill the requirements of the analyses. Both methods require recent accident data for the intersections. However, RK attempted to obtain accident data from the City but was unable to acquire the information during the time of the study. RK obtained a 24-hour traffic count, taken on August 6, 2003. The 24-hour traffic count was taken for each approach of the two study intersections. The count showed the traffic volume on Chase Street to have a 472 ADT (Average Daily Traffic) between the Cypress Drive and Newport Drive and a 336 ADT between Newport Drive and Sagecrest Drive. Pedestrian volumes were not tabulated during the 24-hour vehicle count. Tables 1 and 2 show the traffic volumes collected for each approach at the two study intersections. For this study, RK assumed the pedestrian volume to be low and calculated the pedestrian volumes to be approximately 10 percent of the vehicle volume for the given time period. 2 Field observations confirmed that this assumption would be adequate. The existing traffic volumes worksheets for the study intersections are shown in Exhibit C. RK also obtained a speed survey performed on November 6, 2003. The 85th percentile speed (the speed that 85 percent of the vehicles are traveling or less) for Chase Street is 32 miles per hour and the 10-mile per hour pace speed (10-mile per hour group of speeds that is most frequent) is 23 to 32 miles per hour. The 85th percentile speed and the 10-mile per hour pace speed is shown on Exhibit C, and the entire sample speed data worksheets can be found in Appendix C. The intersections of Chase Street at Cypress Drive and Chase Street at Sagecrest Drive have been evaluated for an all -way stop control using the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices' all -way stop warrants criteria. The following warrant criteria are used for existing conditions: MUTCD All-Wav Stop Warrants Warrant No. Description Results 1 Minimum Vehicle Volume Does Not Satisfy 2 Traffic Signal Warranted Does Not Satisfy 3 Accidents Does Not Satisfy Warrant 1 Both intersections could not meet the minimum traffic volume requirements of 300 vehicles over 8 hours. Even with the addition of pedestrian volumes, the total volumes of the intersections could not meet the second requirement for Warrant 1. Since the 85th percentile vehicle speed on Chase Avenue is below 40 miles per hour, the vehicle and pedestrian volumes at the intersections could not be reduced. Therefore, both intersections are unable to satisfy Warrant 1. Warrant 2 Warrant 2 states that a four-way stop could be implemented as an interim measure when traffic signals are warranted. Since traffic signals are not warranted, both intersections are unable to satisfy Warrant 2. Warrant 3 To satisfy this warrant, there must be five or more accidents that are correctable by an all -way stop. Accident data from the San Jacinto Police Department indicate that this warrant is not satisfied. Result Neither of the two intersections were able to satisfy MUTCD's warrant requirements for an all -way stop at this time. RK also evaluated Chase Street at Cypress Drive and Chase Street at Sagecrest Drive using an alternative method published in the ITE WesternlTE. This method is an all -way stop installation evaluation for residential streets commonly used in the San Francisco Bay Area for neighborhood streets. RK has used this criteria for residential, local, and collector streets in other areas of Riverside County. The following installation criteria are used for the existing conditions: ITE WesternlTE Article: All-Wav Stop Installation Criteria Criterion No. Description Results 1 Volume Does Not Satisfy 2 Accidents Does Not Satisfy 3 Visibility Satisfied 4 Speed Satisfied 5 Crossing Residential Collector Streets Satisfied Criterion 1 RK evaluated both intersections with respect to the volume criterion. Both of the intersections were unable to satisfy the requirements of 300 vehicles per hour for at least eight hours during the day. Although, the side streets did account for at least 1/3 of the intersection volume, both parameters must be met to satisfy the criterion. Criterion 2 To satisfy this criterion, there must be at least three accidents that are correctable by an all -way stop. Accident data from the San Jacinto Police Department indicate that this warrant is not satisfied. Criterion 3 RK performed a sight distance review of both intersections and found the sight distance on several approaches to be approximately 150 feet, the minimum required sight distance for this criterion. The southbound approach at the intersection of Chase Street and Sagecrest Drive and the westbound approach of Chase Street at Cypress Drive had sight distances that were obstructed by existing walls. Parked vehicles near the intersection would compound this problem. RK feels that this criterion has been met. Criterion 4 A speed survey showed the 85th percentile speed on Chase Street to be 31 miles per hour. Therefore, both intersections meet the requirements stipulated in Criterion 4 specifying the 85th percentile speed must be equal to or greater than 30 miles per hour. Criterion 5 Since both of the intersecting streets are considered collector streets to the neighborhood and since both of the street's volumes are relatively equal, both intersections satisfy Criterion 5: Crossing Residential Collectors. 4 Result Both intersections have met at least two of the required criterion, therefore satisfying WesternlTE article for multi -way stop installation criteria for neighborhood streets. Findings Based upon the analysis, both of the study intersections do not meet the MUTCD warrant criteria, but do meet the WesternlTE article, Multi -Way Stop Installation Criteria for Neighborhood Streets requirements. The criteria in which the study intersections do meet the requirements of the ITE method should be noted. At several of the approaches, visibility for the stopped traffic was poor and was measured in the field equaling the minimum sight distance requirement. RK considered this visibility criterion to be satisfied. The speed criterion was satisfied when the 85th percentile maximum speed of 30 mph was exceeded. The 85th percentile of 32 mph is above the 30 mph criterion. The third criterion met was Criterion 5, where both intersecting streets are considered collectors for the neighborhood. Since both connect the neighborhood to major streets for the community and the volumes were relatively equal, the criterion was considered satisfied. Conclusions Even though the intersections did not meet the MUTCD warrants, the ITE WesternlTE article methodology surfaced several safety issues that would advocate for the placement of all -way stops. Considering this, RK agrees that all -way stops would improve safety at the intersections and therefore be recommended. However, RK recommends the City first obtain the School District's "safe route to school plan" before installing the all -way stops. With a review of the plan, the City would be better informed on the location and placement of the stop signs, stop bars, and stop markings in relation to any new school crosswalks for the new school. Recommendations A summary of project recommendations is included in Appendix D. As well, the following recommendations are suggested for these intersections: 1. Install all -way stops at the intersections of Chase Street and Cypress Drive and Chase Street and Sagecrest Drive after review of the new school's "safe route to school" plan. 2. The City should install stop sign ahead warning signs (W17) in advance of the intersection at the time of the installation of stop signs. 3. Install "STOP" pavement markings 8 feet prior to the stop bars or limit lines. 5 RK is pleased to provide this intersection review for the intersections at Chase Street and Cypress Drive and Chase Street and Sagecrest Drive. If you have any questions regarding this analysis or need further review information, please do not hesitate to call me at (949) 474-0809. Sincerely, RK ENGINEERING GROUP, IN 045 Robert Kahn, P.E. Principal Attachments No. 0555 EXP. 12131105 rRAFF\C'_ RK: wg/RK1 988. doc 6 JN:0328-03-05 a kiLA--- Thomas J. Wheat Associate Appendices Blodgett St. S Legend: • = Study Area Intersection I N 0328-03-05 (EX -A) m 0 Sagecres Dr. Newport Dr Cypress c rn Dr. Monterey Dr. CHASE STREET AT CYPRESS DRIVE AND SAGECREST DRIVE ALL -WAY STOP REVIEW , San Jacinto, California Exhibit A Location Map engineering group, inc. Exhibit B Existing Traffic Control and Travel Lanes Blodgett St. duo 2U Legend: 2 = Number of Lanes U = Undivided = Stop Sign sSagecrest Dr. Co_ 7 Newport m Dr. 2U o JN Cypress Dr. 2U n N 0328-03-05 (EX-B) CHASE STREET AT CYPRESS DRIVE AND SAGECREST DRIVE ALL -WAY STOP REVIEW, San Jacinto, Califomia RI( engineering group, inc. 426 Exhibit C Existing Traffic Volumes and Speeds ---I372 I 1213 Blodgett St. 744 Legend: T = Stop Sign 336 = 2-Way ADT (Average Daily Traffic) 1 168 = I -Way ADT (Average Daily Traffic) 31 Mph 23-32 Mph I 0328-03-05 (EX-C) 85th 96 Speed 10 Mph Pace Speed 32 Mph 23-32 Mph 4 Sagecrest Dr. °I Newport Dr. Cypress Dr. 0 m 0 2 CHASE STREET AT CYPRESS DRIVE AND SAGECREST DRIVE ALL -WAY STOP REVIEW, San Jacinto, Califomia /T 512 r --{ 35 i 1256 co R1( 70 Q Let engineering group, inc. Exhibit D Recommendations Blodgett St. Legend: 0 = All -Way Stop = Stop Ahead Warning Sign (W I 7) I 0328-03-05 (EX-D) Sagecrest Newport Dr. CHASE STREET AT CYPRESS DRIVE AND SAGECREST DRIVE ALL -WAY STOP REVIEW. San Jacinto, Califomia RI( engineering group, inc. Tables TABLE 1 Hourly Traffic Counts Chase Street at Cypress Drive End Time NB SB Subtotal NB + SB EB WB Subtotal EB + WB Grand Total 1:00 AM 2 1 3 1 0 1 4 2:00 AM 5 2 7 1 1 2 9 3:00 AM 0 2 2 1 0 1 3 4:00 AM 0 4 4 4 0 4 8 5:00 AM 0 6 6 7 0 7 13 6:00 AM 1 9 10 9 2 11 21 7:00 AM 6 13 19 12 1 13 32 8:00 AM 11 13 24 21 0 21 45 9:00 AM 20 18 38 23 2 25 63 10:00 AM 10 14 24 20 5 25 49 11:00 AM 14 10 24 12 0 12 36 12 NOON 15 16 31 15 4 19 50 1:00 PM 7 11 18 17 0 17 35 2:00 PM 9 8 17 10 2 12 29 3:00 PM 18 9 27 9 3 12 39 4:00 PM 25 20 45 12 4 16 61 5:00 PM 26 17 43 16 3 19 62 6:00 PM 22 20 42 15 2 17 59 7:00 PM 28 14 42 13 1 14 56 8:00 PM 18 8 26 12 4 16 42 9:00 PM 22 9 31 8 1 9 40 10:00 PM 21 8 29 9 0 9 38 1 1:00 PM 9 4 13 7 0 7 20 12:00 AM 6 0 6 2 2 8 TOTAL 295 236 531 256 35 291 822 j: /rktables/rk 1900/RK i 988TB.xls JN:0328-03-05 TABLE 2 Hourly Traffic Counts Chase Street at Stagecrest Drive End Time NB SB Subtotal NB + SB EB WB Subtotal EB + WB Grand Total 1:00 AM 2 0 2 0 1 1 3 2:00 AM 2 2 4 2 1 3 7 3:00 AM 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 4:00 AM 0 1 1 3 0 3 4 5:00 AM 1 4 5 11 1 12 17 6:00 AM 1 8 9 9 2 11 20 7:00 AM 7 5 12 14 4 18 30 8:00 AM 7 15 22 13 14 27 49 9:00 AM 9 11 20 13 13 26 46 10:00 AM 8 9 17 10 20 30 47 11:00 AM 11 7 18 18 19 37 55 12 NOON 12 9 21 10 21 31 52 1:00 PM 5 6 11 9 22 31 42 2:00 PM 7 5 12 6 18 24 36 3:00 PM 10 7 17 9 19 28 45 4:00 PM 10 7 17 20 33 53 70 5:00 PM 16 8 24 5 27 32 56 6:00 PM 11 7 18 10 45 55 73 7:00 PM 17 11 28 9 22 31 59 8:00 PM 8 6 14 7 29 36 50 9:00 PM 10 6 16 13 25 38 54 10:00 PM 9 3 12 13 22 35 47 11:00 PM 4 3 7 6 10 16 23 12:00 AM 1 0 1 2 4 6 7 TOTAL 168 141 309 213 372 585 894 j: irkta b les/rk 1900/RK 1988TB.xls IN:0328-03-05 AGENDA ITEM 4.4 February 5, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Robert Lavin, Public Works Superintendent SUBJECT: Weed Abatement on Undeveloped Parkway Areas RECOMMENDATION: Council shall consider options to help control weed abatement on undeveloped parkway areas throughout the City. BACKGROUND: During a Council discussion at a previous Council meeting, staff was directed to look at different alternatives to handle weed control in the City's right-of-way. Staff has concluded that the best method available would be to utilize wood chips or wood mulch given to the City from local tree companies (at no cost to the City). This type of material usually deters weed growth and maintains moisture around landscaped areas. Locations for wood chip use would be specified by both the Park Supervisor and Street Supervisor to control specific problems or areas of high visibility and utilize the use of Community Service Workers to spread and place wood chips or wood mulch. Two other alternatives are: 1. Weed abatement through a contractor @ $320 per day 2-man crew, or; 2. The use of herbicide through a contractor @ approx. $300 per acre. Retention of weed abatement practices in-house will continue utilizing the Street Division Mower Unit and one (1) operator to concentrate on rural area shoulders and right-of-ways within the City (west -side) and City -owned properties of facilities. JUSTIFICATION: Improve the atheistic of the City's parkways and major roadways and to control weed abatement. BUDGETARY IMPACT: Utilizing the wood chips or wood mulch would have no budgetary impact. Funding for alternatives numbers 1 and 2 would have to be allocated as this was not budgeted. ATTACHMENTS: None. AGENDA ITEM 5.1 February 05, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Bernie Simon Finance Director SUBJECT: Approve Warrant Register for Warrants, Prepaid Checks, and Payroll Checks RECOMMENDATION: By motion, approve the warrant register for the warrants and prepaid items and payroll checks issued since the last Council meeting, for the period ending February 05, 2004 BACKGROUND: The following are the warrant and check numbers for this cycle: Warrant/Prepaid # s Cycle Dates Payroll Checks Cycle Date 66362-66489 February 05, 2004 16292-16317 February 05,2004 Payroll information is available for Council review in the Finance Department. JUSTIFICATION: All warrants, pre -paid checks and payroll checks require Council approval. BUDGETARY IMPACT: Adequate funds have been budgeted to cover the subject expenses. ATTACHMENTS: 1 — Detailed listing of invoices paid and warrant register. Page 1 of 1 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 02/05/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 66364 1/19/04 Arch wireless M6226464L M6226464L M6226464L Telephone ,010-3100-431.35-16 Telephone Telephone 050-9000-450.35-16 010-4150-410.35-16 64.71 34.64 21.53 120.88 66365 1/19/04 At & t STMT 1/14/04 STMT 1/14/04 STMT 1/14/04 STMT 1/14/04 STMT 1/14/04 STMT 1/14/04 STMT 1/14/04 STMT 1/14/04 Telephone Telephone Telephone Telephone Telephone Telephone Telephone Telephone 010-2500-425.35-16 010-3100-431.35-16 010-7400-425.35-16 010-4150-410.35-16 050-9000-450.35-16 010-2500-425.35-16 025-7252-410.35-16 010-6100-425.35-16 960.51 1,098.59 19.29 86.80 86.80 595.46 23.19 8.17 2,878.81 66366 1/19/04 Calpers REQUEST 1/15/04 Ret contr 1/8/04 type 3 085-0000-202.21-28 25,764.58 25,764.58 66367 1/19/04 Hartford life insurance companies REQUEST 1/15/04 Def comp cont grp#109947 085-0000-202.21-29 4,441.00 4,441.00 66368 1/19/04 Icma retirement trust REQUEST 1/15/04 Def comp contb 1/8/04 085-0000-202.21-29 740.38 740.38 66369 1/19/04 Lincoln life REQUEST 1/15/04 Def comp contb 1/8/04 085-0000-202.21-29 335.00 335.00 66370 1/19/04 Mulcock, barry REQUEST 1/19/04 Tuition reimbursement 010-2500-425.31-20 123.08 123.08 66371 1/19/04 Platinium plus for business REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 Greater riv chamber of co Hot wok - luncheon Ibm - printer stand Lake alice trading -lunch Pride of italy-meeting Z-best pizza -luncheon Z-best pizza -luncheon Wild orchid -flower arange Best medical supply -kit Longs -first aid kit Smart & final - supplies Appliance showroom Red barron meals travel e 010-1100-411.31-20 010-1200-412.31-20 010-1400-414.40-45 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.31-20 010-1700-417.31-20 010-2500-425.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 010-2510-425.40-09 010-3100-431.21-19 010-3100-431.21-90 280.00 21.21 489.89 68.36 19.36 29.12 16.73 53.88 10.75 87.29 49.39 455.56 11.00 3,183.85 Panes 1 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 02/05/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 66371... 1/19/04... Platinium plus for business... REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/03 REQUEST 1/19/03 REQUEST 1/19/03 REQUEST 1/19/03 REQUEST 1/19/03 Buger king meals travel e Red barron meals travel e Gustav's pub meals travel One world way parking fee Alaska airlines travel Alaska airlines travel Alaska airlines travel Graybar-computer supplies 010-3100-431.21-90 010-3100-431.21-90 010-3100-431.21-90 010-3100-431.21-90 010-3100-431.21-90 010-3100-431.21-90 010-3100-431.21-90 050-1400-414.40-45 16.83 14.00 34.94 30.00 567.00 567.00 287.00 74.54 3,183.85... 66373 1/19/04 So. california edison co. REQUEST 1/19/04 Utilities 050-9000-450.35-40 36,974.03 36,974.03 66374 1/19/04 So. california gas co. REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 REQUEST 1/19/04 Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities 010-2500-425.35-12 010-2500-425.35-12 010-3100-431.35-12 010-6100-425.35-12 010-7400-425.35-12 010-4150-410.35-12 010-4150-410.35-12 16.91 171.98 144.60 28.42 201.85 47.41 13.62 624.79 66375 1/19/04 Verizon california REQUEST 1/19/04 Telephone 010-2500-425.35-60 3,525.79 3,525.79 66376 1/15/04 Lancaster inspection services 04-01 Dec 22,03 to jan 09, 04 010-3300-417.10-04 3,078.00 3,078.00 66377 1/23/04 San jacinto unified school REQUEST 1/21/04 REQUEST 1/21/04 REQUEST 1/21/04 Fy 2002-03 passthrough Fy 2002-03 passthrough Fy 2002-03 passthrough 097-0000-239.00-00 097-0000-239.00-00 089-0000-239.00-00 220,720.00 390.00 2,225.49 223,335.49 66378 1/23/04 Riverside, county of REQUEST 1/23/04 Filing notice of determin 010-1700-417.36-25 128.00 128.00 66379 1/23/04 Lavin, robert a. REQUEST 1/15/04 Travel & expense 010-4200-410.31-20 227.75 227.75 66380 1/23/04 League of calif. cities REQUEST 12/23/3 Registration attn:b lavin 010-4200-410.31-20 425.00 425.00 66381 1/23/04 Fess parker double tree REQUEST 12/23/3 Lodging for conf 3/2-5,04 010-4200-410.31-20 504.00 504.00 66384 1/27/04 Aflac REQUEST 1/26/04 Aflac ins payment 1/2004 085-0000-202.21-27 2,184.58 2,184.58 66385 1/27/04 Calpers REQUEST 1/26/04 Pers retire 1/22/04 typ 4 085-0000-202.21-28 23,274.49 23,274.49 66386 1/27/04 Hartford life insurance companies REQUEST 1/26/04 Grp#109947 period 1/22/04 085-0000-202.21-29 4,441.00 4,441.00 Pane 2 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 02/05/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 66387 1/27/04 Icma retirement trust REQUEST 1/26/04 Def comp period 1/22/04 085-0000-202.21-29 615.38 615.38 66388 1/27/04 Lincoln life REQUEST 1/26/04 Def comp contr jan 22, 04 085-0000-202.21-29 335.00 335.00 66389 1/27/04 Pre -paid legal services, inc. REQUEST 1/26/04 Jan 2004 payment 085-0000-202.21-87 254.32 254.32 66390 1/27/04 Ritchie, robert REQUEST 1/26/04 Subsistence"trafficfeb04 010-3100-431.31-25 80.00 80.00 66391 1/27/04 Riverside county shefiffs dept. REQUEST 1/26/04 Tuition "traffic collisio 010-3100-431.31-25 222.00 222.00 66392 1/27/04 S.j. police association REQUEST 1/26/04 Sjpoa dues jan 2004 085-0000-202.21-42 1,425.00 1,425.00 66393 1/27/04 Service employees international REQUEST 1/26/04 Seiu assoc dues jan 2004 085-0000-202.21-43 585.90 585.90 66394 1/27/04 Staples credit plan JL13069001 JL13069003 16787 18530 18530 18530 18944 21009 Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies 010-1110-411.21-10 010-1110-411.21-10 010-4200-410.21-10 010-1700-417.21-10 010-3300-431.21-10 010-2500-425.21-10 010-3100-431.21-10 010-1200-412.21-10 61.96 15.61 145.45 35.50 45.90 243.51 102.11 50.63 700.67 66395 1/27/04 Tri-lake consultants, inc. 1790 Professional services 065-0000-201.06-47 21,755.65 21,755.65 66396 1/27/04 United way of hemet REQUEST 1/26/04 Contributions jan 2004 085-0000-202.21-80 130.38 130.38 66399 2/5/04 A-1 lock & key service 29755 29739 29747 Supplies Supplies Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 010-3100-431.33-50 010-3100-431.33-50 4.31 8.62 15.00 27.93 66400 2/5/04 Accela PA35901 Software 010-3300-431.34-05 1,260.00 1,260.00 66401 2/5/04 Advanced telemetry systems 13002 Fcc lis & utc license 055-4170-450.40-45 575.00 575.00 66402 2/5/04 All ways green 12 Consultation pest control 010-4150-410.21-14 150.00 150.00 66403 2/5/04 Allen tire company 166221 Auto repair 010-7100-410.33-50 106.60 106.60 66404 2/5/04 Arrow printing 3575 3574 3573 3573 Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies 010-2500-425.21-10 010-1200-412.21-10 010-1700-417.21-10 010-3300-431.21-10 106.67 82.43 44.44 44.45 957.36 Pane 3 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 02/05/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 66404... 2/5/04... Arrow printing... ,3572 3572 3572 3572 3578 3582 Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies 029-8662-417.30-90 010-3300-431.21-10 010-3320-431.21-10 010-4100-410.21-10 010-3300-431.21-10 050-1400-414.21-10 29.50 29.50 29.50 29.49 62.50 498.88 957.36... 66405 2/5/04 At & t 12/22/03 6478 Telephone 010-2500-425.35-16 42.98 42.98 66406 2/5/04 Auto glass pros 1/6/04 Auto repair 010-7100-410.33-50 130.00 130.00 66407 2/5/04 Bio-tox laboratories 11688 11697 Supplies Supplies 010-3100-431.34-05 010-3100-431.34-05 373.70 149.90 523.60 66408 2/5/04 Blue ribbon plumbing 93051 Services rendered 010-2500-425.33-10 450.00 450.00 66409 2/5/04 C r & r incorporated 4808 Sweeper waste 056-4150-410.35-18 1,957.19 1,957.19 66410 2/5/04 California overnight 4182449 4174786 4174786 4186635 Postage Postage Postage Postage 010-1110-411.21-10 010-3300-431.21-10 010-1700-417.21-10 010-1700-417.21-10 30.44 52.50 32.00 8.00 122.94 66411 2/5/04 Callaway motorsports 99117244 Auto repair 010-3100-431.33-50 115.00 115.00 66412 2/5/04 Ced consolidated electrical 2983-424997 2983-424790 2983-425095 Supplies Supplies Supplies 010-7100-410.33-30 025-7260-410.21-30 025-7260-410.21-30 128.63 54.69 37.84 221.16 66413 2/5/04 Comserco 01-041931-000-0 01-041932-000-0 01-041928-000-0 01-041926-000-0 01-041998-000-0 01-042011-000-0 Radio equipment Radio equipment Radio equipment Radio equipment Supplies Supplies 010-3100-431.40-45 010-3100-431.40-45 010-3100-431.40-45 010-3100-431.40-45 010-3100-431.33-50 010-3100-431.33-50 9,757.33 9,757.33 9,757.33 9,852.00 226.28 358.81 39,709.08 66414 2/5/04 Comtronix of hemet 40745 Raido equipment 010-3100-431.33-50 122.16 122.16 66415 2/5/04 Cutting edge staffing 15512 15512 Temp employees Temp employees 010-3300-431.30-90 010-7100-410.10-04 2,658.43 548.28 8,534.23 Panes 4 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 02/05/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 66415... 2/5/04... Cutting edge staffing... 15557 15557 15647 15647 Temp employees Temp employees Temp employees Temp employees 010-3300-431.30-90 010-7100-410.10-04 010-7100-410.10-04 010-3300-431.30-90 2,689.16 548.28 426.44 1,663.64 8,534.23... 66416 2/5/04 D.m.c. tree care 1/05/04 Services rendered 032-7150-410.40-01 1,120.00 1,120.00 66417 2/5/04 E.s. babcock & sons, inc. AA40138-0278 AA40440-0278 AA40446-0278 AA40783-0278 Analysis Analysis Analysis Analysis 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 48.00 30.00 20.00 60.00 158.00 66418 2/5/04 Eastern municipal water district 1/15/01 1490420 1/15/019199801 1/13/04 9079501 1/13/04 9217802 1/13/04 8500010 01/12/04 437960 1/12/04 9539902 Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities Utilities 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7100-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 025-7250-410.35-10 15.18 139.00 20.13 112.97 17.58 8.37 14.33 327.56 66419 2/5/04 Ewing 4034851 4034852 Supplies Supplies 010-7100-410.21-80 010-7100-410.33-30 209.04 113.75 322.79 66420 2/5/04 Federal express 1-536-91726 Postage 010-1110-411.21-10 20.54 20.54 66421 2/5/04 Fleet services PU000000316 PU000000316 PU000000316 PU000000316 PU000000316 PU000000316 PU000000316 PU000000316 PU000000316 November 2003 gasoline November 2003 gasoline November 2003 gasoline November 2003 gasoline November 2003 gasoline November 2003 gasoline November 2003 gasoline November 2003 gasoline November 2003 gasoline 010-1200-412.33-50 010-1400-414.21-10 010-3100-431.21-70 010-1700-417.21-70 010-3300-431.21-70 021-4150-410.21-70 010-7100-410.21-70 050-9000-450.21-70 010-3320-431.21-70 37.74 56.52 4,005.96 73.73 31.55 397.42 436.63 888.81 105.11 6,033.47 66422 2/5/04 Golden bell products 11272 Supplies 055-4170-450.33-30 258.60 258.60 Pana 5 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 02/05/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 66423 2/5/04 Gosch ford FOCS291101 Auto repair 010-4150-410.33-50 540.06 540.06 66424 2/5/04 Graves & king Hp NOVEMBER 30,03 Attorney fees 020-2200-419.30-90 2,110.45 2,110.45 66425 2/5/04 Harbor freight tools 101674 Supplies 010-4150-410.21-80 58.01 58.01 66426 2/5/04 Harding, diane REQUEST 1/15/04 REQUEST 1/12/04 Reimbursement Reimbursment 010-3100-431.21-90 010-3100-431.21-90 10.00 102.65 112.65 66427 2/5/04 Hdl software, Ilc 90014 Software 010-1701-417.34-05 2,088.64 2,088.64 66428 2/5/04 Hemet valley pipe & supply 80670 80577 80614 80569 Supplies Supplies Supplies Supplies 010-7100-410.33-30 010-7100-410.33-30 010-7100-410.33-30 010-7100-410.33-30 22.39 5.76 33.50 90.54 152.19 66429 2/5/04 Hemet valley tool & supply 66326 66256 Supplies Supplies 050-9000-450.21-35 055-4170-450.33-30 12.93 42.02 54.95 66430 2/5/04 Home depot credit services 115933 107194 Supplies Supplies 010-3300-431.21-10 010-7100-410.33-30 127.91 159.84 287.75 66431 2/5/04 Hubbs stationery 4223 Supplies 010-1400-414.21-10 165.61 165.61 66432 2/5/04 Inland foundation eng. inc. 7825 Professional services 022-4150-410.40-01 542.50 542.50 66433 2/5/04 Inland water works supply co. 133280 133665 Supplies Supplies 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 38.79 220.73 259.52 66434 2/5/04 J & j automotive 18401 Auto repair 010-4200-410.33-50 20.00 20.00 66435 2/5/04 J & m air conditioning 77660 Supplies 010-7400-425.33-10 59.00 59.00 66436 2/5/04 Jesse's auto glass & upholstery 1084 Auto repair 010-3100-431.33-50 225.00 225.00 66437 2/5/04 Kommerstad family trust 1/1/04 1/1/04 1/1/04 Lease rental/equipment Lease rental/equipment Lease rental/equipment 050-0000-235.00-00 010-4150-410.60-10 010-4150-410.60-15 6,134.93 8,764.41 1,077.04 15,976.38 66438 2/5/04 La chemcial 268023 268932 Supplies Supplies 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 1,173.64 1,473.67 2,647.31 66439 2/5/04 Lancaster inspection services 04-02 Jan 12,04 to jan 23, 04 010-3300-417.10-04 2,888.00 2,888.00 66440 2/5/04 Long beach uniform co. 563515 Uniform supplies 010-3100-431.21-35 657.22 1,314.44 Pans Fi City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 02/05/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 66440... 2/5/04... Long beach uniform co.... 566384 Uniform supplies 010-3100-431.21-35 657.22 1,314.44... 66441 2/5/04 Lsa associates, inc. 54281F Professional servcies 010-1700-417.30-90 300.00 300.00 66442 2/5/04 Melendez, richard REQUEST 1/15/04 Mileage/reg reimbursement 010-3100-431.31-25 139.40 139.40 66443 2/5/04 Micro mobile 9227 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 67.50 67.50 66444 2/5/04 Mission uniform services, inc. S 85605 17978880 17977852 S 85604 17979918 17979915 17979916 17980942 17980945 17979917 Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies Uniform supplies 010-7100-410.21-35 010-7100-410.21-35 010-7100-410.21-35 055-4170-450.21-35 010-4150-410.21-35 050-9000-450.21-35 010-4100-410.21-10 050-9000-450.21-35 010-4150-410.21-35 010-7100-410.21-35 44.01 29.16 22.86 6.50 38.07 57.83 6.07 57.83 49.09 24.57 335.99 66445 2/5/04 Moore store, the P162072-00 Supplies 010-3100-431.21-10 170.07 170.07 66446 2/5/04 Nextel communications REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone 010-1200-412.35-17 010-1700-417.35-17 010-1400-414.35-17 010-1700-417.35-17 099-1700-417.35-17 010-3300-431.34-05 010-4150-410.35-16 025-7252-410.35-16 010-4150-410.35-16 010-1400-414.35-17 010-7100-410.35-16 010-3300-431.34-05 010-7100-410.35-16 050-9000-450.35-16 74.12 99.68 70.17 70.17 70.17 81.08 70.17 70.17 43.04 43.04 50.98 74.37 108.08 83.59 1,671.71 Panes 7 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 02/05/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 66446... 2/5/04... Nextel communications... REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 REQUEST 1/14/03 Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone Cellular phone 050-9000-450.35-16 010-7100-410.35-17 010-3300-431.35-17 050-9000-450.35-16 010-1110-411.35-17 029-8662-410.35-17 010-2500-425.35-16 050-9000-450.35-16 050-9000-450.35-16 134.46 46.97 68.72 74.12 41.74 72.73 8.03 53.63 162.48 1,671.71... 66448 2/5/04 Overnight industrial 22024 22079 Supplies Supplies 010-7100-410.33-10 010-7400-425.33-10 294.44 140.61 435.05 66449 2/5/04 Pacific alarm svc., inc. 39624 39624 39624 39624 39624 39629 Alarm fees Alarm fees Alarm fees Alarm fees Alarm fees Alarm fees 010-4200-410.34-05 010-7100-410.34-05 050-9000-450.34-05 010-2500-425.34-05 010-6500-425.34-05 010-3100-431.21-19 198.50 16.00 118.50 87.00 38.00 26.00 484.00 66450 2/5/04 Pierce plumbing 30513 30521 30512 30517 Supplies Supplies Supplies Supplies 010-4150-410.33-30 010-7100-410.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 17.07 65.02 63.58 68.43 214.10 66451 2/5/04 Pins & needles embroidery 2497 Uniforms 010-3300-431.21-35 318.94 318.94 66452 2/5/04 Pju telecomm 11207 Servcies rendered 102-1400-500.40-45 412.84 412.84 66453 2/5/04 Portable storage coproration 4534 Storage contanier 102-1400-500.40-45 2,553.25 2,553.25 66454 2/5/04 Press enterprise 666318 665692 680981 Advertisment Advertisment Advertisment 096-1700-417.36-25 096-1700-417.36-25 096-1700-417.36-25 371.70 177.00 177.00 725.70 66455 2/5/04 Purchase power STMT 1/02/04 Postage 010-2500-425.21-10 30.00 30.00 66456 2/5/04 Quality auto parts D646111 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 17.22 298.52 Paae 8 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 02/05/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 66456... 2/5/04... Quality auto parts... D648144 D649013 D647892 D651677 D649997 D649807 Supplies Supplies Supplies Supplies Supplies Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 010-4150-410.33-50 010-4150-410.33-50 050-9000-450.33-30 055-4170-450.33-50 055-4170-450.33-50 61.46 10.74 34.37 4.84 155.38 14.51 298.52... 66457 2/5/04 Quasttree service 1/15/04 Services rendered 032-7150-410.40-01 3,532.50 3,532.50 66458 2/5/04 Ramona animal shelter, inc. 01/15/04 STMT 12/31/03 Animal intake dec 2003 Animal intake november 03 010-3100-431.34-05 010-3100-431.34-05 3,781.25 3,524.75 7,306.00 66459 2/5/04 Regency lighting 315976 Supplies 025-7260-410.21-30 54.84 54.84 66460 2/5/04 Reliable CYH41298 YX980900 YXZ98000 YXZ98000 YXZ98000 RNC79300 RNC79300 Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies Office supplies 010-4200-410.21-10 010-4200-410.21-10 010-1110-411.21-10 010-1210-412.21-10 010-1200-412.21-10 010-1400-414.21-10 050-1400-414.21-10 -32.31 44.11 5.73 8.06 60.09 214.06 4.73 304.47 66461 2/5/04 Riverside county sheriffs SH0000001521 Contract law enforcement 010-3100-431.30-90 4,604.80 4,604.80 66462 2/5/04 Riverside county waste manageme 334864 401598 Street cleaner dump fees Street cleaner dump fees 010-4150-410.33-30 010-4150-410.33-30 20.00 31.50 51.50 66463 2/5/04 Riverside, county of 3668 Assessor maps • 010-1700-417.21-10 3.00 3.00 66464 2/5/04 Riverside, county of -transportation TL0000001175 Traffic signal service 010-4150-410.34-05 8,202.00 8,202.00 66465 2/5/04 Rod's automotive performance 131230007 140112003 Auto repair Auto repair 010-3100-431.33-50 010-3100-431.33-50 516.07 1,141.67 1,657.74 66466 2/5/04 San bernardino police department REQUEST 1/22/04 Tuition "colt m16/ar15 010-3100-431.31-20 375.00 375.00 66467 2/5/04 Shred it 5082252 Services rendered 010-3100-431.21-10 85.00 85.00 66468 2/5/04 Southern, ken REQUEST 1/22/04 Subsistence"colt m16/ar15 010-3100-431.31-20 30.00 30.00 66469 2/5/04 Stater bros 1210605 Supplies 096-1700-417.21-10 31.22 54.66 Pane 9 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 02/05/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 66469... 2/5/04... Stater bros... 1210116 Meeting city council 010-1200-412.31-20 23.44 54.66... 66470 2/5/04 Stetson engineers inc. 12202 Professional servcies 050-9000-450.40-01 9,223.54 9,223.54 66471 2/5/04 Stirdivants shoes 544 Boot allowance r. sanchez 010-7100-410.21-35 140.61 140.61 66472 2/5/04 Superior ready mix concrete 1337356 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-30 51.72 51.72 66473 2/5/04 Tire's warehouse of hemet 5211 5181 5182 Auto repair Auto repair Auto repair 010-3100-431.33-50 010-3100-431.33-50 010-3100-431.33-50 340.71 255.53 85.18 681.42 66474 2/5/04 Town & country golf cars 6785 Serviced golf cart 050-9000-450.33-50 131.03 131.03 66475 2/5/04 Tri-lake consultants, inc. 1819 1819 1820 1824 1825 1831 1829 1828 1826 1822 1821 1823 1830 1833 1832 Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services Professional services 021-4150-410.30-90 010-4100-410.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 010-1700-417.30-90 029-8662-417.30-90 052-9000-450.40-01 022-4150-410.40-01 052-9000-450.40-01 039-4155-410.40-01 054-9000-450.40-01 022-4150-410.40-01 054-9000-450.40-01 022-4150-410.40-01 052-9000-450.40-01 022-4150-410.40-01 2,802.20 2,878.38 7,600.00 1,235.00 5,855.14 380.00 3,085.00 237.50 1,440.00 40.00 162.50 2,162.38 1,652.50 1,235.00 357.50 31,123.10 66477 2/5/04 Underground service alert 03120683 Population fees 050-9000-450.33-30 415.50 415.50 66478 2/5/04 Valley chronicle, the 1522759-001 2521869-001 2521870-001 2522811-001 2521217-001 Xmas tree lighting Advertisment Advertisment Advertisment Advertisment 010-2510-425.40-09 010-2510-425.40-08 010-2510-425.40-08 010-1100-411.36-10 096-1700-417.36-25 250.00 250.00 250.00 4,063.41 700.00 5,513.41 Pane 10 City of San Jacinto Warrant Register Date: 02/05/04 Check Number Check Date VendorName Invoice Number Description Account Number Transaction Amount Check Total 66479 2/5/04 Valley diesel 3912 3919 3916 Auto repair Auto repair Auto repair 010-4150-410.33-50 010-4150-410.33-50 010-4150-410.33-50 55.00 55.00 55.00 165.00 66480 2/5/04 Valley foreign auto body 0337 Auto repair 010-3100-431.33-50 403.00 403.00 66481 2/5/04 Valley service connection 1775 1775 Main street clean up City hall/vir lee clean 010-7100-410.34-05 010-2500-425.33-10 880.00 400.00 1,280.00 66482 2/5/04 Valley steel and welding 9824 Supplies 010-4150-410.33-50 128.70 128.70 66483 2/5/04 Vulcan materials company 193310 194776 195851 Supplies Supplies Supplies 010-4150-410.33-30 010-4150-410.33-30 050-9000-450.33-30 177.63 118.57 189.19 485.39 66484 2/5/04 West group 894954 12/31/03 STMT Subscription Subscription 010-3300-431.21-15 010-3300-431.21-15 127.00 85.00 212.00 66485 2/5/04 Western highway products 355252 Supplies 010-3100-431.21-90 60.31 60.31 66486 2/5/04 Wetworks pool care STMT 01/01/04 04100101 Monthly services dec 2003 Statement dec 2003 050-9000-450.33-30 010-8400-425.33-10 949.31 788.87 1,738.18 66487 2/5/04 Williams, cecelia REQUEST 1/19/04 Reimb refuse servcie 059-0000-308.08-68 30.74 30.74 66488 2/5/04 Xerox corporation 99967291 99755335 99556598 99755343 99755338 000061594 Lease on copier Lease on copier Lease on copiers Lease on copier Lease on copier Lease on copier 010-4200-410.34-05 010-4200-410.34-05 010-2500-425.34-05 010-3100-431.34-05 010-3100-431.34-05 010-3100-431.34-05 221.48 174.56 383.78 365.48 180.91 557.24 1,883.45 66489 2/5/04 24 hour fire protection, inc. 103119 Services rendered 010-7400-425.34-05 45.00 45.00 Total Checks 543,294.13 Pane 11 5.� MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 22, 2004, 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order Mayor Jim Ayres called the Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council to order at 7:07 p.m. Prior to opening the meeting Mayor Ayres noted that public comments regarding 1.5.3 would be heard under 2.0 Public Comments section. 1.2 Roll Call Present: Jim Ayres, Chris Carlson-Buydos, Ken Shaw, Dale Stubblefield Absent: Jim Conner 1.3 Invocation — Rev. Randy Leeper, Faith Tabernacle, San Jacinto Rev. Leeper gave the invocation. 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance Council Member Stubblefield led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1.5 Special Presentations Because of the travel time Mayor Ayres noted Terri Neuswander, representing the Riverside County Fair and National Date Festival, would be taken out of order. Following introductions by Ms Neuswander, Queen Scheherazade and her court invited the City Council and those present to the event February 13-22, 2004. 1.5.4 Business Spotlight of the Month / L.O. Lynch, Inc. accepting Emil Worm and Ken Swarthout / Economic Development Specialist Randy Williams, Economic Development Specialist, commented the first spotlight of 2004 was L.O. Lynch, Inc., originally known as L.L. Lynch. It is the largest pump company in the valley with 20 employees. Following many interesting facts about the company, City Council Minutes January 22, 2004 Page 2 of 13 Emil Worm and Ken Swarthout accepted the plaque from Mayor Ayres. 1.5.1 American Cancer Society "Relay for Life" presentation / Anna Martin, Volunteer Chairperson Anna Martin informed the Council the "Relay for Life's" goal is to raise $100,000 this year for the American Cancer Society. Ms Martin then introduced three of the young women of the 19 participants in the youth team. Ms. Martin noted it is a 24 hour event. Mayor Ayres commented that he would be organizing a team from the City. 1.5.2 Q-Star Technology / Public Safety Sub Committee Mayor Ayres noted that the Public Safety Sub Committee had reviewed a similar presentation and thought it would be beneficial for the Council to also see it. Carlita Mead explained that the camera is a vandalism deterrent mechanism. It is operated with a remote on the ground, including battery and film check. The camera is able to pick a license plate number at 100 ft. in the dark with no lights. Ms Meade further noted that it runs on five batteries, it tends to be bullet proof, is typically mounted on a 16' foot pole, and nationally used for catching illegal dumpers. She noted the cities using it to assist in the prosecution of law breakers. Ms Meade offered to loan a couple of units for the City to test at no risk. Mayor Ayres advised Ms Meade that the City Manager would be in touch to make the necessary arrangements. 1.5.3 Overview Sheriff's Department Services / Sheriff Bob Doyle and staff's presentation Assistant Sheriff Gayle Janes explained he is responsible for field operations and was present to explain how contract services work. The Sheriff's department is preparing a proposal to provide local law enforcement within San Jacinto City limits. Said proposal will be delivered to the City Manager on February 3, 2004. Sheriff Janis then introduced the officers present from the Sheriff's Department. He noted some of the career development for officers that had left city departments to begin working with the Sheriff's office when their cities no longer provided local (city) police protection. City Council Minutes January 22, 2004 Page 3 of 13 Sheriff Janes than gave a PowerPoint presentation, which included, the present organizational chart, the history of the contract law enforcement, the 12 cities contracted with the Sheriffs Department: Moreno Valley, Norco, Pal Desert, Coachella, Calimesa, Lake Elsinore, La Quinta, Perris, Canyon Lake, Temecula, Indian Wells, and Rancho Mirage; noting that is exactly half the cities in Riverside County. The City can determine the level of service and the cost is determined by the service level provided. More highlights the Sheriff's Department handles: all the human resource services, including employee training, labor negotiations, benefits, discipline, grievances personal injury, wrongful death, and employee lawsuits. The logistics of other items covered include radio and dispatch, equipment, and fleet services. They have specialized services including SWAT, hazardous materials, forensic science, canine program, aviation, special investigation, and central homicide units. The City would only pay for overtime to utilize these special teams. Other communities retained their community involvement in partnership with the Sheriffs Department: the local department could keep their patch but would have to switch to the green and tan uniform; citizen supported volunteer programs, reserve deputies, search and rescue, chaplin, citizens on patrol, etc. Sheriff Janes noted that to keep their cost down, they would be offering a standard five year contract with an automatic renewal provision. There is a 12 month termination provision for either party. The cost of the contract is based on full cost recovery: the City only pays what it costs. The cost recovery is analyzed annually and is based on personnel, mileage, and facility. When deputy cost is reviewed it includes salary, benefits, compensation, supervision cost, station clerical support, administrative investigative, administration and media information and other supports. Support costs include dispatch, finance, accounting, informational technology, etc. Community based programs can be as much or as little as the City wants. Mayor Ayres noted that specific questions could be answered under public comments, as the Sheriff's Department staff had offered to answer questions. The City Council will take public testimony for 30 days. He noted that response time is a frequently asked question. Sheriff Janes noted that it depends on how many officers the City pays for. It could be better or worse than it is currently. If the same number of cars is kept, then it will remain the same. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: City Council Minutes January 22, 2004 Page 4 of 13 Beverly Griggs, 298 S Jordan, San Jacinto, commented her family has been in San Jacinto since 1915. According to Ms Griggs, there has always been a dispute between the City and the Police Department. She expressed concern about the response time if the switch was made to the Sheriff's Department. She noted that her friends in Perris and Val Vista have had slow response from the Sheriffs Department. She encouraged the Council to keep the police coverage local and the police department should be appreciated and acknowledged for what they do. Moreen Williamson, 401 West Main Street, San Jacinto, presented a petition of a consensus of those that would like to keep the police department local. There were initially 804 signatures; approximately 100 of the signatures were stolen from on of the locations gathering signatures. Dr. Janice Hickerson, 1151 Reinhart, San Jacinto, commented she has lived in San Jacinto for the past nine years. She heard the contract with the Sheriff's Department was a "done deal" and that it was going to be identical to Temecula's contract. Dr. Hickerson requested to know if there was a written or verbal contract. The Sheriffs office employee was confident the contract does exist. Mayor Ayres responded there is no contract, verbal or written. There will not be one until there is a public vote. Sheriff Janis responded, and confirmed the Mayor's comment — there is no contract. If she wants to give him the name, he will follow up. 3. PUBLIC HEARING None 4. CITY DEPARTMENTS 4.1 Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (JPA) creating the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (FCA) for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Approve / Community Development Director Community Development Director Tim Hults reviewed the formation of the JPA for the MSHCP: This is the final step to begin implementation of the MSHCP. The two items of concerns for the Council were how the leadership would be selected and the indemnification for the City. The WRCOG executive committee approved the JPA, noting the JPA will select their own executive director and the indemnification provision is included. Staff recommends approval and selection of JPA representative. City Council Minutes January 22, 2004 Page 5 of 13 Vice Mayor Carlson-Buydos questioned if the County was taking the lead for the first three years. Director Hults responded that is in place, as they are the only ones with sufficient technical staff to do the job at this time. Council Member Stubblefield commented he is on the FCA Board, as it is the same as the WRCOG. The first meeting of the JPA is scheduled for February 1, 2004 at 4:00 p.m. M/S/C (Ayres / Shaw) moved to approve Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (JPA) creating the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (FCA) for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Carlson-Buydos, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres Nays: None Absent: Conner Abstain: None 4.2 Request to Initiate Zoning Ordinance Amendment (Burn Policy) / Discuss and direct staff / Community Development Director Director Hults reviewed the current Burn Policy and why it was adopted: Non -conforming uses, i.e. a house in a commercial zone may stay unless it suffers more than a 50% burn; then it can't be rebuilt. There are specific limitations on non -conforming structures if damaged to re-establish the house. Because lenders are aware of this rule they won't finance or allow a mortgage on the property. It has caused a hardship on one family and their real estate agent continues to bring this item before the Planning Commission and Council. Planning Commission opted to not initiate the change as they believe the regulation to be valuable and should stay as it is. Joan Berggren, 272 Grand Army Avenue, San Jacinto, noted that she was not speaking specifically for Mr. Alexandru (Adrian Alexandru) but in general. The policy was adopted 20 years ago without sufficient notice or public input (the applicable rules were followed at the time of adoption). Ms Berggren suggested a policy like Long Beach, as they rescinded a similar policy. What she was able to find out was that the policy hadn't been helpful. Ms Berggren then read a section of Government Code as it applies to duplexes, as she believes the City's regulation takes away an individual's rights. Vice Mayor Carlson-Buydos questioned how many situations were there that would or could be caught in these transitional land uses (houses in City Council Minutes January 22, 2004 Page 6 of 13 commercial or industrial areas). Director Hults guessed about 12, commenting that most are on Seventh Street, Eighth Street, and State Street. Vice Mayor Carlson-Buydos commented that she believes it is an important tool. She questioned what Hemet's tool is for similar situations; what predicament would it place the City in if they changed to allow replacement only — no expansion; and if it would be highly detrimental to redevelopment. Director Hults noted that the language in this particular regulation is exactly the same as it is in Hemet. He was informed that a Hemet staff person created a policy that was in conflict with their City Ordinance. That person is no longer there. Attorney Ballinger concurred that was correct. Attorney Ballinger than reviewed the City's regulation. Mayor Ayres questioned how to get to a place where this owner could sell his house. Attorney Ballinger commented that would be a Council policy decision. Vice Mayor Carlson-Buydos questioned what other cities besides Hemet do in these situations. Attorney Ballinger remarked that it is a good tool but how often it is used is unknown. He believes the City should not relinquish the tool. Vice Mayor Carlson-Buydos noted that she would be willing to look at single family but not multifamily and would like to know the areas that would be relinquished. City Council consensus was to bring it back in 30 days and propose a hybrid, if that is possible. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR 5.1.1 Warrant Register for Warrants, Prepaid Checks, and Payroll Checks Period Ending 01/22/04 / Approve / Finance Director 5.1.2 January 8, 2004 Regular Meeting Minutes / Approve / City Clerk 5.1.3 Treasurer's Report November 2003 / Approve / Finance Director 5.1.4 Ordinance No. 04-01 / An Ordinance Approving Planning Commission's Change of Zone 3-03, Tract 31293, Re -Zoning certain Properties / Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance 04-01 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance Approving Change of Zone 3-03, Re - Zoning certain Properties Located Approximately 535 feet North of Cottonwood Avenue on the East Side of the Lyon City Council Minutes January 22, 2004 Page 7 of 13 Avenue from Residential Agriculture Accessory Business (RAAB) to R-1 (One -Family Residential) / Community Development Director 5.1.5 Ordinance No. 04-02 / An Ordinance Approving Planning Commission's Change of Zone 4-03 with vesting Tentative Tract 31384, Re -Zoning certain Properties / Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance 04-02 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance Approving Change of Zone 4-03, Re - Zoning 26.6 gross acres on the easterly side of Lyon Avenue, approximately 880 yards north of Cottonwood Avenue and south of De Anza Drive from Residential Agricultural Accessory Business (RAAB) to One Family Residential (R-1) / Community Development Director 5.1.6 Save America's Treasures Grant — Estudillo Mansion / Approve / Community Development Director 5.1.7 Rancho San Jacinto CFD No. 2 Landscape Improvements / Approve / Public Works Superintendent 5.1.8 Household Hazardous Waste Mobile Collections Program / Approve agreement with Riverside County Health Services Agency and Authorize City Manager to execute agreement / Public Works Superintendent 5.1.9 City Landscape Maintenance reductions proposal for Fiscal Year 2003/2004 third and fourth quarters / Approve / Public Works Superintendent 5.2.0 Facade Enhancement Loan Program for the Downtown Zone / Approve / Community Development Director 5.2.1 Sewer Negotiations / Approve / Receive and File / City Manager 5.2.2 Sixth Street & Mistletoe Avenue Water Line Project / Award Public Works Contract Project No. 03-052 to Genesis Construction Company of Hemet for the sum of $386,850.00 plus 15% contingency, Authorize City Clerk to reject all other bids received and Authorize Mayor to execute contract / City Engineer 5.2.3 Tract 30813-1 — Offsite Drainage Easement (West of Kirby Avenue and North of Cottonwood Avenue) / Accept / City Engineer City Council Minutes January 22, 2004 Page 8 of 13 5.2.4 Resolution No. 2509 / A Resolution requesting federal assistance in the construction of the San Jacinto River Levee Expansion / Approve and Authorize The Valley Group to deliver said resolution and support letters to our federal representatives Mayor Ayres pulled 5.1.6, 5.1.7, 5.1.9, 5.2.0, 5.2.2, and 5.2.4. Vice Mayor Carlson-Buydos pulled 5.2.1 M/S/C (Carlson-Buydos / Stubblefield) moved to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Carlson-Buydos, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres Nays: None Absent: Conner Abstain: None 5.1.6 Save America's Treasures Grant — Estudillo Mansion / Approve / Community Development Director Director Hults reviewed the project information. He noted the list is not prioritized. The grantor just wants a list of what exactly the grant pays for. All seven items on the list are anticipated to be paid for. Once this document is submitted then an implementation agreement will need to be signed by the Mayor. If the City accepts this under the National Park Service then the other grants received are the match and they will have to be reviewed by the National Park Service. He further informed Council he will include the bid documents and hopefully get the authorization to proceed. This process has put the interior grant on hold. The received grant in jeopardy is the EMWD's. However, he is hopeful to obtain an extension. M/S/C (Carlson-Buydos / Ayres) moved to approve the Save America's Treasurers Grant regarding the Estudillo Mansion. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Carlson-Buydos, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres Nays: None Absent: Conner Abstain: None 5.1.7 Rancho San Jacinto CFD No. 2 Landscape Improvements / Approve / Public Works Superintendent Mayor Ayres noted he would like to have the timeline. He thanked the subcommittee for there commitment to bring this forward. Public Works Superintendent Bob Lavin noted there has to be an architect attached to the project before it can go out to bid. The Council will see the City Council Minutes January 22, 2004 Page 9 of 13 specifications and have to approve the bid specifications and will also approve the bid award. Vice Mayor Carlson-Buydos commented the improvements and enhancements go back into Rancho San Jacinto, as it is their money and added a hardscape suggestion. M/S/C (Ayres / Carlson-Buydos) moved to approve the proposed Rancho San Jacinto CFD No. 2 Landscape Improvements Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Carlson-Buydos, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres Nays: None Absent: Conner Abstain: None 5.1.9 City Landscape Maintenance (LLPD No. 1) reductions proposal for Fiscal Year 2003/2004 third and fourth quarters / Approve / Public Works Superintendent Superintendent Lavin commented the evaluation was based on the maintenance currently done in LLPD No. 1. The savings is about $12,000 per month for an expected annual savings of $100,000 to $150,000. Vice Mayor noted that LLPD No. 2 is not impacted and the area will be maintained just adjusted appropriately for each season. She asked for a friendly amendment to the approval that quarterly reports be done back to Council on the impact. Mayor Ayres thanked Superintendent Lavin and Parks Foreman Ray Sanchez for their work to save the City money. M/S/C (Carlson-Buydos / Ayres) moved to approve the LLPD No. landscape reductions for Fiscal Year 2003/2004 3`d and 4th quarters and to report back to Council quarterly. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Carlson-Buydos, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres Nays: None Absent: Conner Abstain: None 5.2.0 Fagade Enhancement Loan Program for the Downtown Zone / Approve / Community Development Director City Council Minutes January 22, 2004 Page 10 of 13 Mayor Ayres expressed concern about little or no interest shown in the past. He suggested a surgical mailing, as it is a larger area than the stores on Main Street. Attorney Ballinger noted this is a Redevelopment Agency issue and should be on their calendar. Council consensus moved it to the RDA Agenda following these consent calendar items. 5.2.1 Sewer Negotiations / Approve / Receive and File / City Manager Vice Mayor Carlson-Buydos requested this be deferred another meeting because of other litigation and negotiations. Council consensus- - concurred to completely remove it from tonight's Council agenda. 5.2.2 Sixth Street & Mistletoe Avenue Water Line Project / Award Public Works Contract Project No. 03-052 to Genesis Construction Company of Hemet for the sum of $386,850.00 plus 15% contingency, Authorize City Clerk to reject all other bids received and Authorize Mayor to execute contract / City Engineer City Engineer Habib Motlagh noted that the construction is scheduled to start the first week of March. The neighborhood will be noticed adequately. M/S/C (Ayres / Carlson-Buydos) moved to approve the Sixth Street & Mistletoe Avenue Walter Line Project, awarding the Public Works Contract Project No. 03-052 to Genesis Construction Company of Hemet for $386,850 plus 15% contingency; and authorized City Clerk to reject all other bids Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Nays: Absent: Abstain: Carlson-Buydos, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres None Conner None 5.2.4 Resolution No. 2509 / A Resolution requesting federal assistance in the construction of the San Jacinto River Levee Expansion / Approve and Authorize The Valley Group to deliver said resolution and support letters to our federal representatives Mayor Ayres noted letters of support are needed from surrounding communities. He would like to take them with him when he goes to Washington, D.C. on March 6, 2004. City Council Minutes January 22, 2004 Page 11 of 13 Letters of support have been received from Perris and Canyon Lake. He directed the City Manager to input from Lake Elsinore. Valley Group is going to Washington in February and they are willing to lobby for support, too. M/S/C (Ayres / Carlson-Buydos) moved to Resolution No. 2509 / A Resolution requesting federal assistance in the construction of the San Jacinto River Levee Expansion; and further moved the Valley Group to deliver resolution and letters of support to federal legislators Motion carried 4/0 Ayes: Carlson-Buydos, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres Nays: None Absent: Conner Abstain: None Mayor Ayres recessed the meeting at 8:27 p.m. and then reconvened it at 8:57 p.m. 6.0 MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS 6.1 Committee and/or Agency Agendas / Receive and File / City Clerk 6.2 Proposed joint meeting between City Council and the San Jacinto Unified School District Board / Request to set meeting date and agenda items / Mayor Ayres Mayor Ayres informed Council he and the City Manager had met with the San Jacinto Unified School District Board (SJUSD). There are several items their board needs to discuss with the whole Council. February 12, 2004 is a holiday for some but thought it might be a good joint meeting night. Council concurred. City Manager Cosentini will confirm with Dr. Damian for 7:00 p.m. in the room across from the regular meeting or at the Community Center. SJUSD Board President Megan Cope was present. Ms Cope address the Council briefly on: 1) Operation Clean Sweep — a ticket equivalent to a traffic citation can be issued to students for things like graffiti. It is to make students accountable for their actions. Council consensus is needed to implement 2) Each needs to review the other's General Plan. Discussion of where schools are being designated would be helpful. 3) The community is involved in the schools. It shows, including test scores are up. City Council Minutes January 22, 2004 Page 12 of 13 Council Reports Council Member Shaw reported on the last meeting of the Consortium of Care. The press has had several articles on the homeless condition. Social Services is going to do another survey. He noted the problem is delicate and not sure everyone is going to be happy with the outcome. Council Member Stubblefield noted WRCOG was dark and the next meeting on February 2nd will be followed by the first JPA. The water committee met and the water subcommittee will be meeting shortly to bring back recommendations. Vice Mayor Carlson-Buydos commented VEDC met on 1/21/04. The draft strategic plan has been received and she believes VEDC is moving towards what it needs to be doing. On 2/11/04 is VEDC's General Membership meeting at the Hemet Library. Dinner is served at 5:30. She would like to see the full council there. Mayor Ayres noted the passing of the oldest San Jacinto resident. Roy Waters missed his 100th birthday by a few months: He was one of the Grand Marshals at the 2003 4th of July Parade. Also, the president of the American Legion Post 848 and long time resident, Bob Moffat, passed away this past week. Services will be at the McWayne Funeral Home on Saturday. Anyone wishing to contribute to sending flowers, please see the Mayor after the meeting. Mayor Ayres recessed the Regular meeting to open the Redevelopment Agency meeting at 9:13 p.m. Mayor Ayres reconvened the regular meeting at 9:16 and noted following a short recess would go directly into closed session. 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Police Officers Association No reportable action. 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford Employee Organization: Sergeants Association No reportable action. City Council Minutes January 22, 2004 Page 13 of 13 7.3 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representative: City Attorney Unrepresented Employee: City Manager No reportable action. 7.4 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9: One (1) or more cases No reportable action. 8. ADJOURNMENT With no further business before the Council, and followed by the Council's acclimation, Mayor Ayres adjourned the meeting at 10:10 p.m. City of San Jacinto by Jim Ayres, Mayor ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM 5 3 February 10, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Bernie Simon Finance Director Jack Templeton, Accountant 0 SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report at December 31, 2003 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File Treasurer's Report for December 31, 2003. BACKGROUND: Total Cash and City Investments increased 0.01% during the month. This includes cash, cash in bank and cash with trustee. At December 31, 2003, $561,546 remains from the original $1.3 Million Loan from RCTC in 1998. Some of the large expenditures during the month included items such as $203,305 to Riverside County Fire Department for Fire Contract, $134,496 to Genesis Construction for De Anza Lift Station And Water Main Project, $121,618 to Best, Best & Krieger for legal fees, $91,939 to Ramsey Street Ford for Police Vehicles, $80,050 to Albert A. Webb Associates for San Jacinto River Levee Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Project, $66,875 to Esgil Corporation for Plan Check Fees, $55,001 to Perma for Workers Compensation Premiums, $41,944 to Tri-Lake Consultants for Professional Fees and $40,000 to Western Pacific Housing to refund overpaid annexation fees for Police/Fire CFD 2003. Disbursements were made from trustee funds relating to principal and interest debt service requirements for Tax Allocation Bonds of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto of $199,924. The Treasurers' report is a "snapshot" report of our cash position on the last day of the month in all of our accounts. Page 1 of 1 Page 1 INVESTMENT TYPE INSTITUTION SERIAL 6 CITY OF SAN JACINTO TREASURERS REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2003 INTEREST RATE 11/30/03 PURCHASE MATURITY PREY. MONTH YIELD DATE DATE BALANCE 12/31/03 CURRENT BALANCE % change from prior month 12/31/03 COMPUTED MARKET ACCRUED VALUE INTEREST STATE POOL Money Market DEMAND Account PAYROLL Account IMPREST Account L.A.I.F. Bank of Hemet Bank of Hemet Bank of Hemet ' Bank of Hemet Cash on Hand TOTAL CITY INVESTMENTS & FUNDS CFD NO 7 Mutual Fund Mutual Fund Mutual Fund Corporate Obligations Mutual Fund Mutual Fund Mutual Fund Trusted Union Bnk Union Bnk Union Bnk Union Bnk Union Bnk Union Bnk Union Bnk 1.546 % 1.240% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 1.546 % 1.240% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RFSTRICTED CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT (BOND FUNDS) Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Bayerische Lankbk GIC Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Blkrock Prov. T-Fund TOTAL CFD NO 2 6711695201 6711695202 6711695204 6711695204 6711695205 6711695301 6711695501 CFD NO 7002-1 Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund 67116952006 TOTAL CFD NO 2 REFINANCE RDA SAN JACINTO TAX ALLOCATION BONDS Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 94-1 U.S. Treasury Notes Union Bnk Alamo Capital Money Market Union Bnk Alamo Capital Cash Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 94-1 1997 WATER IMPROV. Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund TOTAL 1997 WATER IMPROV. 7002 WATFR REVENUE BONDS Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund SOBORA RDA BONDS Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund 11CTC LOAN Money Market USB US Bank 0.790% 0.790% 0.790% 4.050% 0.790% 0.790% 0.790% 0.790% 0.790% 0.790% 4.050% 0.790% 0.790% 0.790% Various 11/01/01 Various Various Various Various Various Various Various 10/10/02 Various Various Various 0.790% 0.790% Various 7-15639 0.790% 0.790% Various 678544857 678544857 7-15777 4.750% 0.400% 0.790% 4.760% 0.400% 0.790% Various Various Various 7-15980 0.790% 0.790% Various 7-15980-06 0.790% 0.790% Various 6-711682901 0.790% 0.790% Various 7-16274 0.790% 0.790% Various 96-444672 0.570% 0.670% Various Open Open Open Open ' Open n/a Open Open Open 09/01/14 Open Open Open Open Open 02/15/04 Open Open Open Open Open Open Open $13,764,584 $400,915 $358,627 $30,570 $1,433 $600 $13,164,584 $705,835 $879,272 45.015 $1,433 $600 -4.36% 76.06% 146.18% -83.60% 0.00% 0.00% $13,218,648 $705,835 $879,272 $5,015 $1,433 4600 $54,064 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $14,556,729 $14,756,739 1.37% $14,810,803 $54,064 41,395 40 $8 4748,800 $20,020 $40,688 $26,025 8836,936 $827,116 $827,116 $533,500 41,396 0.07% 40 0.00% 48 0.00% $748,800 0.00% 420,030 0.05% $40,708 0.05% $26,038 0.05% $836,980 0.01% $827,528 0.05% 4827,528 0.05% $333,760 -37.44% 41,396 $0 $8 $748,800 420,030 $40,708 $26,038 $836,980 $827,628 4827,528 $333,760 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a $50,391 $3,861 $0 $54,252 $50,219 $3,863 $0 -0.34% 0.05% 0.00% $54,082 -0.31 % $50,219 $3,863 80 $54,082 n/a n/a n/a n/a $1,360,870 $1,351,543 $204,140 0.05% $204,242 0.06% $1,555,010 $1,655,785 $15 0.05% $15 0.00% $1,361,543 $204,242 $1,555,785 815 n/a n/a n/a n/a 490,090 $90,135 0.05% $90,135 n/a 4561,341 $561,546 0.04% $561,546 Prepared By: Jack Templeton, CA - 01/16/04 Page 2 CITY OF SAN JACINTO TREASURERS REPORT FOR THE MONTH ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2003 11/30/03 12/31/03 % change 12/31/03 COMPUTED INVESTMENT INSTITUTION INTEREST PURCHASE MATURITY PREY. MONTH CURRENT from prior MARKET ACCRUED TYPE SERIAL # RATE YIELD DATE DATE BALANCE BALANCE month VALUE INTEREST TOTAL CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT TOTAL ALL FUNDS I CERTIFY THAT THESE INVESTMENTS COMPLY WITH ALL STATE LAWS PERTAINING TO THE INVESTMENT OF LOCAL AGENCY FUNDS AND THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO'S INVESTMENT POLICIES. CITY OF SAN JACINTO MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SIX MONTH CASH FLOW REQUIREMENTS AS PER GOVERNMENT CODE 536461b1131. AMES W. POTTS, TREASURER City Of San Jacinto 84,468,260 84,269,831 -4.45% 94,259,831 n/a 819,014,989 819,016,570 0.01% 819,070,634 854,064 Prepared By: Jack Templeton, CA - 01 /16/04 AGENDA ITEM 5-4- February 5, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer SUBJECT: Lake Park Drive Well and Main Street Waterline (Project No. 02- 022) RECOMMENDATION: Authorize bid advertisement for construction of Lake Park Drive Well and Main Street Waterline. BACKGROUND: Stetson Engineering is under contract to design the plans and specifications for construction of Lake Park Drive Well proposed at the northeast corner of Ramona Expressway and Lake Park Drive within the City's property immediately adjacent to the road. This property is the result of right-of-way exchange between EMWD and the City of San Jacinto due to construction of Lake Park Drive Bridge. EMWD will have to record the necessary documents to transfer the property to the City; their staff has been in communication with City Manager and myself indicating their concurrence with the well location. The extension of waterline along Main Street from Camino Los Banos to the well was anticipated to be included in the Main Street Pavement Rehabilitation project. However, recently staff was directed to include the waterline with the well project. To merge the waterline and the well project, we respectfully request that the Council authorize bid advertisement after completion of final design and specifications expected within two to three weeks. Appro City Manager: Finance Director: Page 1 of 2 According to the attached memorandum from Finance Director dated January 13, 2004, $1,871,485.00 is currently available in combined water funds. On January 22, 2004, City Council authorized construction of Sixth Street and Mistletoe Avenue Waterline Replacement and Upgrades at an estimated cost of $430,000.00, leaving a balance of approximately $1,330,000.00. Stetson Engineer's estimate for the well was $920,000.00, the estimated cost for Main Street Waterline is $400,000.00. JUSTIFICATION: Ensure availability of reliable source of water to the residents within the City's Water Service Area at a reasonable cost. BUDGETARY IMPACT: Adequate funds are available from 1997 San Jacinto Water Improvement Bonds and 2002 Water Revenue Refunding Bonds, as well as water capital improvement fund (Project No. 02-022). ATTACHMENTS: 1. Memorandum from Finance Director dated January 13, 2004 Page 2 of 2 MEMORANDUM January 13, 2004 To: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer From: Bernie Simon, Finance Director Subj: Capital Funds Available for Water Improvement Projects Bond Funds Available: 1997 SJ Water Improvement Bonds Project Account — 700015980-05 11/30/03 $1,350,780 2002 Water Revenue Refunding Bonds (Bal. of 1993 COP Project Funds) Project Account — 700015980-06 11/30/03 204,035 Total Bond Funds 11/30/03 $ $1,554,815 Water Capital Improvement Fund (051) Capital Improvement Fees & Interest Available Through 12/31/03 $ 415.170 Total Available Capital Improvement prior to O/H $1,969,985 5.0% Overhead Charge Estimated (98,500) Total Available $$$$$$$— 1,871,485 FINANCE DEPARTMENT • AGENDA ITEM 5. 5 February 5, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members,, of the City Council FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Enginee SUBJECT: Final Tract Maps 30462 and 30462-1 — Greystone Homes, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: By motion, 1) Approve Final Tract Maps 30462 and 30462-1; 2) and authorize the City Manager to execute the subdivision agreement. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract Map 30462 is a 212 single family lot subdivision on 60.15 acres, located at the southeast corner for Sanderson Avenue and Seventh Street. This subdivision is being recorded in two final tract maps; Final Tract Map 30462 encompasses 109-lots, and Final Tract Map 30462-1 encompasses 103-lots. The improvement plans associated with this subdivision have been approved and construction of infrastructure is under way. Adequate bonds, including landscaping improvements, have been provided to ensure installation of the required improvements. Additionally, on October 2, 2003, the entire area of Tract 30462 was annexed to the City's Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2, and on November 6, 2003, this project was annexed to the City's Community Facilities District 2003-01 for Police and Fire Protection. JUSTIFICATION Final Tract Maps 30462 and 30462-1 have substantially complied with the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and the City of San Jacinto Subdivision Ordinance. Appropriate securities to complete the offsite improvements have been posted with the City and are part of the subdivision agreement. App City Manager: Finance Director: Page 1 of 2 BUDGETARY IMPACT All consulting fees associated with the review of final map and improvement plans has been paid in full by developer. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Final Maps 30462 and 30462-1 Page 2 of 2 OWNER'S STATEYEYi WE 11131EBY STATE THAT NE ARE THE OWNERS OF TIE (.AND INCLUDED EMIR THE SI6ONSON SHOWN HEREON THAT WE ARE THE ONLY PERSONS THOSE CO19NT I NECESSARY TO PASS A CLEAR TITLE 1O SAD LAND: THAT WE CONSENT 10 THE MATONO AND IECODO1O OF THIS SUBOINSION MAR AS SHOW WTI THE ODIRICIIVE BORDER UNE. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO PUSUC USE FOR STREET NM PUBLIC UTlt1Y PURPOSES. LOTS 'A' THROUGH Ir. NOJISAC. W ALSO IEREBY DFO ATE 10 11[ CITY V SW JA0N0 LOT 'A. RE LANDSCAPE PIIPORS GEMSTONE HOES INC.. A DELAWARE CRPORATOI VI (A_ P/CS/ derT- NOTARY ACLENT t COCOVMY OFAj,V .L 1 as. 0111/PERSO4- 9Y APPEAE.g0AE .E - JGL .1, -_ �. PERSONALLY PROM THE1*1 0 ME ApE 9U/_ VISTOMIENT /Ty�E A0A0 105E0000EE TO ME TILT I /IbHB"REII1DTEO T1pE40 SATEON TIE NSTUYENT 11HEAUTHOIZED AND THAT BY OR ENTRY UPON BEHALF OF .. TBE PECERI(Si ACTFA EIIECUTD THE INSTRUMENT. CRESS MY HAND AND FOR SAID STATE MY PAL OF BUSINESS. 0 inn COUNTY. NY COI6MSSON BORES 7l Cr DE FFOOL011N0 DOERS OF bEASEENTS ARDOR OTHER 4.36 OF THE SLIBORIMON INTERESTS HHAAVE BENNCLOTTED: SAN JACINTO :LAND ASSOCIATION, ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, HOLDER OF A RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT FOR ROARS AND FOR CONSTRUCTION AND YANIENAIO OF ALL NECESSARY WATER PIPES AO DOMES, FLUME AND CONDUITS FOR ALL PURPOSES OF MCADOO AND 001AESTC USE: THE EDICT LOCATION 1HEE0F NOT BUNG G50DSL0 BY TIE RENYROS IN THE CRY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 30462 RE1N0 A SIJBONSION OF A PORTION THE VEST HALF OF FARM LOT 1541 OF THE LANDS OF THE SAN JACINTO LANDS ASSOCIATION, AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOO( 8. PAGE 381 OF MAPS RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA. LOCATED N SECTION 32, T.4S. RAW, S.B.M. K t A ENGINEERING, INC. JANUARY. 2004 TAX COI I ITCTGR'S CFRTIFPCATF I (HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF 1111 OFFICE AS OF 1K5 DAZE THERE ARE NO UFNS AGAINST TIE PROPERLY SHOW di TIE YAWN MAP FOR UNPAID STATE COUNTY. MUNICIPAL. 01 LOCAL TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WMECTED AS TAXES. EXCEPT TAKES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS DOL LTE0 A5 TARS, NOW A LIEN BUT NOT VET PAYABLE WiMH ARE *SEAMED 10 EC S DATED: 2004 PAUL MCOINE1L COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR BY: DEPUTY IAILAQNILIJEEMISCATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND N TIE SUN OF E HAS BEEN COWIE° ANC FLED NTH ME BOAR OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA. CONDIIIOSD UPON THE PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, STATE COUNTY, MO60PAL dR LOCAL. AND ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS C0EEC1® A5 TA1D5, OHM AT THE ME OF TIE FILING OF 1165 MAP WB1 111E COUNTY REORDER ARE A LIEN AGAINST SRO PROPERTY BUT NOT YET PAYABLE AND SAID BOND HAD BEEN DULY APPROVED BY SAD BOARD OF SPERNSORS. DATED: 2004 NAICY ROMERO CLERK TO THE BOLD OF SUPERMSOIS CASH TAX TOLD PAUL MCDOINELD COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR BY: BY: DEPUTY DEPUTY OTT ENGINEER'S STATFYFyT I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAW EXACTED THE WTHN ANNEXED MAR: THAT THE SUBONSDN SHORT HEREON IS SIIDTANTMLY THE SAE AS IT APPEARED CM TIC TENTATIVE YAP: THAT ALL THE PROMSIOIL Cr THE SIDONOW YAP ACT AND OF WE OF/ OF SAN JACINTO °ROMACE NO B73 HAVE BEET COPIED W11H, AND I AM SATISFIED NAT THIS YAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT AS SHOWN. DATED I -1 �Q� FOR HABB IL OWINGL RCE 33103 0TY DVCNEER. CITY OF SAN JA01N0 PUBLIC WORKS DRtECTOR APPROVAL THE STREET DEIXCATION5 SOWN ON ME MEW ADEIRD MAP ME HEREBY APPROVED MS OAY 00 2004 PUBLIC WOES DIRECTOR. CT OF SAN JACINTO _wl R RFOflRF A WELIWART SW5 REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY BRAD FOUNDATION EIOHEMM, INC. CN ADE 51. OGW. AS REILMM 0Y TIE HEALTH AND SAFETY CEDE OF CALIFORNIA SLICES 1533. SURVEYOR'S STATEIME T SHEET 1 OF 5 SHEETS R'S 10TA 1a0IT FLED (IRS — DAY O - 2004. AT _ M. IN BODI< — OF MAPS AT PAGES = — AT 1TE RECTUM OF 11E CITY COG. NO FEE GARY L 0)50 COUNTY ASSESSOR - CLERK - RECORDER DEPUTY SJBGNPM GJARARIEG NORTH ANGBCNI TITLE COMPANY I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM A UCNSED LAID SUB.EYGR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THAT THIS MAP CONBLSINO OP FTC 5 SHEETS CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SIPERWS0I DUGND JANUARY Or 2003L THAT ALL MONUMENTS SHOW HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST AND THEN POSHW1S ARE CORRECTLY S10BN, OR MULL BE N ACCORDANCE ETII THE TERMS OF 1HE MONUMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE MAP. THE MONUMENTS MU. BE SIFTHSENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. THE SURVEY IS THE ANO COMPLETE AS SHOWN. RTIJAM R. DPIRES -wow 33-04 DATED: CAA/ la 2004 L5 1510 CITY ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT THE CITY OF 5A. JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY AID THROUGH ITS GAY AUTHORIZED OFFICES AT A REGULAR UMW) ON 2003, HEREBY APPROVES SAD FINAL NAP AND ACCEPTS TIE DEDICATIONS SOW HEREON FOR PUBLIC ROAD. PUBLIC UIRJTES AND LANDSCAPE PURPOSES TIE ACC PTN1LE OF THE OFFER O: ODICATIO N OF CITY Swim 15 CONTINGENT UPON TIE COMPLETION OF ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS DATED MIS DAY O MAYOR ATTEST CITY OF SAN JACINTO CITY OF SAN JAC1N10 CITY CLERK PLANARNO CdNY15GION STATEMENT 111I5 NAP, TRACT NO 30462. IS A PORTION OF THE CRICWAL TENTED.* MAP OF TRACT N0. 30182 SAID TENTATIVE TRACT YAP WAS APPROVED Of THE CITY OF SAN JAONTO PI -NNW COLO:WORI R4 ACCORDANCE WTI THE LAWN A DULY AUTHORIZED MEETING HELD MARCH 13, 2002. CRY OF SAN JACINTO. CAISGNIA SECRETARY. CITY OF SAN JA0NT0 PLANNING 031/1159GN DATED THE DAY OF 00 w ESPLANADE AVENUE N 8754'43' W 2642.83' (2843.08' R1 & R2) (2542.99' R3) (1321.321 (1321.54' R1 & R2) 2 • 1• N 5 ' i§A 101-4 kl w gA 9g 61 (1321.311 (1321.54' RI & R2) N 0454'27" W (1321.411 37095' ne=srww NWIDOLD- COI1R1 (1321.58') (1321.72 R1 & R2) L (1321.681 (1321.72' R1 /4 R2) N59'5419'W (2643.38) (0043.44' R A R2) (2643.56' R3) (2643.45 R4) 7 TH STREET a: 12, 124, di 0- COTTONWOOD w 0 b w 340 n6E'A'61w WARREN RD. SARD 11_2N A b LYDN sAN JAU,N,.0 (2641.43' R3) (2040.10' R5) N6454'23'w (2841.431 // - SU3HS S 8 GRAPHIC SCALE 23 5a 1Ip 200 SCALE 1• a 50' cum DATA lac arms DELTA AID 5, 10103' worse gem' NOTE: SEE SHEET 2 FOR SURVEYOR'S NO16, DATA REFERENCE NOTES ANO 9 01' NOTES. 73 IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CAIJFORNIA TRACT NO. 30462 ®0' A SUBDIVISION OF A PORIOR 11E NEST NYF OF FIRM LIR 159 OF 11E LNIOS OF 11E SAN JACO= LAME ASSOCIBIOIE AS SHOWN ON A WP THEREOF RECORDED B BOOK 8. PAGE 357 OF WPS, RECORDS 1r SW DECO cowry. CAI1ORM. LOCATED B SEC1D11 32, T45, R.IW., SOD. I( & A ENGINEERDIG. INC. JANUARY. 2004 MCAT KO. 30062-1 NL . / _ 1Ba5]04Y 10100' 3 7314 Sr. ED $ 9 a �+A. 6 7 5. n413r. Kj s6/* 4 sr. a NM sr.}}^1 n !I 10 1 Dm lOJY '7t , 47 I•n wow5r. I IN 1a IDrsi'04Y 225m•i LOT -H. \ -- W.1RiiY`51(^L " �- aam' 0, Minn 127]1 1 MARIGOLD COURT q ro i as� 11 .„ 1 y _ NV sr. 46 1021/3310411 (176.2s') 47 \\\ $ moss b4Y IOW } 61 70211 U o. CAJ\� ~ 2 ca ----6 Ms sr. P. A a., G 4.§ arya I �317 14 „ 1343 Nal ss. N 1511 7307 5F. k I15r6T04Y mar C lam 5 1mm llaPslWY 10301 1 1 17 9 16 A, 5g( 16 7D4 sr. k aan ss. 1 fJ! 19 ® 66 9� 1 g tl 7Dr sr. 6 1z 1 4�j,� t/j.i Y ma ss. ll MaP90411 a00' "'// _- - 'O MO ) 51r' N �/ 1 / 7Am ci cIa (mm7J 6 I iFARM00,.....v M wFADOWS pi DRNE 11, N • tDr9'04Y c 12100_' 4am' �� 240.' 10 t9 $ RI I IDrsro s 551m I •'a' 7 LOT .I, @ 1 1ass7e.w IOaSI' AI LOT 'J' 7 C �� — — — —ems 5. 59w5 lam ,4 SLOW st.n 4b.27eY 7 r �v7 dp�,§I7` ,3, 1 „aa Sg • 67 a1m Sr. = R P. ; 7rn sr. d CI 1 5. 5' e0'I Alm I 1 1 72X 1aB55'04Y (191m1 4r5340, 27am 41 27 22 g i a11a sr. 16.E 7505l04Y 37640' 29 SEE SHEET 4 12&45' 22 SHEET 3 OF 5 SHEETS 'rRkCi Y0. 30462-1 LJ.®. / IMarm'1r total 66 7210 sr. 1aW541101/ moo' 7210 Sf. 1a45415111 10101 0 u. 721 ri DTI 1010r $ nlau. I 10754'0050 me' 4 5 sr. 'WY 1010r 63 7210 ss. 90w 10100' 7210 2 sr. t5s4311 10300 201 3r. Nar5r0057 10100 20 �' I sa al 19 1®54b5Y (OW341 tl 11 a 74m sr. U F it 1 to rs.mY 3OF]Y IwJ E 71 74 7417 ss. Nose 70 7434 sr. IU311S4bra 100.31' 71 7432 ss. i0r5.'a0W 10950 72 74.W sr. l5r34a01. 10aD' 77 73 NYa4'Ora loam 75 74m sr. bow 100.11 78 NOTE: SEE SHEET 2 FOR SURVEYORS NOIES, DATA REFERENCE NOTES INO EASEINNT NOTES. SEE SHEET 5 S. 45 . 49 -•A 1\ d GRAPHIC SCALE 115 w� TRACT MO. 304E2-1 57 05 3e156 47 IN THE CRY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 30462 IE112 A ST ESON OF A PORI1N THE MIST NM 00 FAA LOT 15a OF TIE DADS OF THE SW J/gNIO LINOS ASSOTADON AS WillONA 1NP MEE6 RECORDED IN ROOK 0, PAGE 357 OF 110275. RECORDS OF SAN DE0 COWRY. CALM..LOCOSO LOCATED IN CI15 31.1.45... 0111- SRN.K & A ENGINEERING, INC. JANUARY, 2004 42 SEE SHEET 3 .,, (loam) 7200'�ii 0 nm 77.0E 40 722 SE H ag 26 d 0 n SF. 8 Tii g Tao ss. w 7m ss. I" 39 ' r s g tam Sr.y�Jay' .1y} s S Nzabr 4 IaS�J' 21-ip 46.0eib. ST el_a" [r 4 E.Hr,• • 5724' WVD, 'nAy ,per 1 z•"� • `>'. I I r,7'-1,1r E1 11 I 15 1 35 b g I:msst�i IIJI 'B 15.E JX. zt5oo' `F g ss' 1 LAVENDER 1 �ss'191r �0.90' COURT '4 I NAY 1 Dt N6rse•NY' 178.7E CI I 1 MSM 2.9' EBB& 5714 4Y,y I 1 ▪ %a; Tr WE DATA NO. LI W 10720' l 53W10 170.7 azweta N111505Y1 Na'S1'11Y p i 7p �eA 4 Y IR 36 7004 Sr. @ 55er cur taArttnt 09 32 MINCE 1111' 5111' CONE DOA NO. 011A CI I000D' 1500'5W 2025 24 14f SIOD• 8 2 gI J5ia+6. �L�7 lam Sr. & 33755F. 7•ait 3a SF. r 32 d ■ me sr. S 72a' 52 w 7t10 ST. 7L 5 8 no ss. 72.10' 72W ICI54'4017 375.43' NW'54 1.911 57683 23 g 31 sal SF. 6E]G 1R47251 54 7206 Sr. 81 22 ' MP54 011 rala1"Rff1 ,a w T. P 58 eras Sr SHEET 4 OF 5 SHEETS n Ner52011 109.05' 78 7201 SF. tarsccow 1140E 10 7179 m sr. 95549711 10.10 �710'111D1f eo 1 s 57.7,' U`1"R��/l' 13 C 4' i / - 7. \I/' {�4 l6` er od/ sa 7ae SF. .{,+ y, �y�`41 41.46• •C. V Yi 94 LOT .C. N8754' 01r Sm.4Y ®91' 93 7205 SF. ®el' 8 92 w 1D ss. .11 91 90 721e SF. mt u aM' 1110 NY54175 lfIA1' L0' 153 P01 6/367, 5.7. G9. 5e33' as 1011 SF. ass 77R 11a_ 7831' °IWO idO. 30452.1 9a le 104 g aOn as. 101 7275 ss. IN THE CRY OF SAN JACINTO. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 30462 BBNC A SIECIPASEN OF A TERROR THE WEST RALF OF FIRM LOT 159 OF 11E LINOS OF 11E SW 3421140 LYI05 ASSOWNON• AS 91011P1 ON A IMP 14REOF FED IN BOOK B. PAGE 357 OF IMPS. RECORDS OF SW 0E90 CWMIT. CNANW9A 1009393 IN sailor' 3S 1.49.. R.1W.. K & A ENGINEERING, INC. JANUARY, 2004 .0. / I I Ire ~J 09 IB9W1. 1210 ar. 33 L 38 87.331 N995C37111 132131• LCT 153 DSO 3/357, S.C.CO. S 37 93 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25 50 100 200 SCALE: I. 50. 33 54a 96 Y RIa as. 7>AV SEE SHEET 4 35 34 72.14 IIWlNWn1 Anal 19 3449T1 375A5• N595V'49Y 375E LOT •C. l S4''N'W 5750 tsar 95 nos sr. Y wsr W991• B4 OARS SF. OAF SHEET 5 OF 5 SHEETS NOTE: SEE SHEET 2 FOR SURVEYOR'S NOTES, DATA R@S Ust9 E DOTES AND EASENENT MITES. (1321.311 (1321.54' RI & R2) ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 30462 BEING A SUBDNISIUN OF A PORTION THE WEST HALF OF FARM LOT 159 OF THE ANDS OF THE SAN JACINTO (ANDS ASSOCIATION. AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 8, PACE 357 OF NAPS. RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COMM. CALIFORNIA. LOCATED IN SECTION 32, T.45., R.1W.. S.B.N. K & A ENGINEERING. INC. JANUARY. 2004 (660.132') FD. 1' LP. w/ Pusrs RUG. WIRER:MIRE, DN. 0.2' P01 RN. CO. OR Bo 16. ACCEPTED AS THE SW COR. FIRM LOT 159 MO 1100 CL 113,w0c1.DON PER PUB 28/100. DINE COURT ESTABUSHID BY SINGLE PROPORTION. (660.78') POSSLM COURT PARCEL • F0. 1 1/4' IP. TAGGED. 'Ls RE54'. FLUSH N CONC. PER PUB 1 34-35 FOR FOR THE SE COR. ENDA LOT 150 AND THE CL 1111110.6I. . SANDERSON AVENUE N 00306'58' E (264327') (2643.48' R1 & R2) (2843.41' R3) (2642.45' R5) (351.67) (14227N) 10 101 86 NOP07'25"E 1o1 g 13 LET CLO,ER Lt FARM MEADOWS DRIVE 160006'56'E 35668' 60 81 62 63 64 65 68 67 SWEET CLOAB LOOP 106 '5 (11E8.10') GLEN 9 V 176 175 174 173 172 I 70 (2643.12') (26,13.32' RI & R2 WIR • 265 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 100 200 4m 800 1111 SEA E: 1' a 200' 5 LO CAWSTON A (814.24) PARCEL I 111 'Ls809S. TAGGED, NO REF.. ACCEPTED AS THE NE COR FIRM SOT 151 MID THE 0. INTERSECTION PER PUB 26/100. N 00'0 '53' E (2642.97') (2843.15 RI & R2) (2643.27' R3) (2643.00' RIB KIRBY STREET RA 5287 Pll S AVENUE 1D. 1 - IRON ROO. ON. 16', PER me 13 0 ro "j 3 RCS.CAW.C.D. IMP OF o SEC. 22. T.45.. R1W.. WEAL FOR THE W' 1/4 COR SIM 32 .� AND C/L 1 N. Ai F0. 1 1/4' LP. TAGGED ND WURY.. ION. 1B' PPR8O4a/02�-0-02 & RCF.C.AW.00. MAP OF SEC. 32. T.45.. R1W.. FMI THE N 1/4 CDR SEC. 32 AND O/L INIERSECDNI. N000?02•E (2643.87) (2643.97' R3) (2644.0I' R4) o yT�DI01D/WA5I6'Pplf' N1L 6�. 0 ND. REF. A GI m11ASC/C/LI' INRI6FLIro AHD ltff NW CORNER OF FNM LOT TSB rtsa ' O PER PUB 2B/100 V SHEET 1 OF I SHEET VICINITY MAP N.T.S. LINE DATA N0. EFEN= INSTANCE LT No'M'36 2600' L2 NEESSOP6 ORM' LT 110058561 110,00' U 21m83'04r1 tom' 15 HBNTaW 18100' L6 I101r0f36t 3132' U IBP06'OOE 0731' N 146564'03'I 1O3m' 'o1S0060'E 1036' 1 L10 N8954OJiY 161.34' ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTES NI BEODNOM NSNL BE CONERSRC MIX CUSS B RAMO. AS PER THE =FORM B11RMA cow. THE REOWED WAKE 5181(E 0CWBNC IRE N16MMs 91.111. BE Dp1N1ID AID! KLf0GD 61300 APPRorilivE wow A EHLT Mon TD ow CowausT 1E MAMA 1151E P2 PLIED ON AN INOIAp6L UST. DATE LETTIN RED R1c1Rs14M DATE 01 HINISI0H OmTPllgl OWNERS STATEMENT NE NEMRY STATE TIT NE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED WHIN 11E 95ON9ON SHOWN HEREON. THAT WE ME THE ONLY PERSONS COURSE CONSENT I5 NECESSARY TO PASS A OEM TIRE TO SAD LAND; THAT AE CONSENT TO TIE IMPS AND RECORDING OF THIS 91BDM1O1 MAP AS SHOWN NNNIN THE OSRCRYE TOMEA UNE JVE HEREBY DEDICATE TO PUBLIC USE FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES LOOS 'C' TROUGH '0', NCUANE NE ALSO MEW =CAE ID 11E CIIT OF SAN JACINTO LOT 103 FDR PARK NO MENNE PIW3S WE ALSO MIME GOCATE ID ME CITY O 5N1 MORO ID15 'A' MD 4 FOR UMISCJPE PURPOTES. GREYSIONE 40*405. INC- A DEIAWARE COB1(RAIION T BCC V LCl'i�c5l itareffummaianamr CoCgMTY6 1Yrr511, 3�Fs-s- yE, PTFR•'SCNALLLY APPEAREO� 7NFT /HrE�Y�� A N N Pil'_ PERSCNALLY 101PM TO' M '., � THE 10 CAE IMOSE 5 TAME 111E 04*41 JOBED I WS/I/1JNSI'NNS�TRUMENNTN06010 '., 002 SRI 1 EEHIT NT 51 NE TIE PERSONQ1 *0119T WEER MEIINST E TTFASON(6J %M�IE,SS// MY H/An/ND' �C1i0 1 :y/L/ f MY 11 PA PEASE OF BUSINESS /A�OI/AJgFPI.IBIUC CRT! ANO FOR SAD STATE IS R LI[.t.'C, # GUMMY. V ./ �(IT( t• �Il 127, MY COMMON EAPRES IP414O.Y SIGNATURE OMISSIONS PURSUANT TO SECNT 56435 OF THE SUBDINSON MAP ACT, ONE SIGNATURES OF THE FQLONES OWNERS OF ENEMAS AND/OR OTTER INTERESTS HAVE BEEN OPINED: SAN JACINTO LAID ASSOCIATION. ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSETS, HOLDER OF A RIGHT OF WAY AIM EASEMENT FOR ROADS AND FOR CONSTRUCTION AND UA ITOIMICE OF ALL NECESSARY COMER PRIES AD DROSS. FLUMES AND CONDUITS. FOR ALL PURPOSES IF OWGATT AND o0MESIC use, THE EXACT LOCATION THEECF NOT BONO OISIAPSED BY THE RECORDS. IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 30462-1 BEING A SUBONISION OF A POiTCN THE VEST HALF OF FARM LOT 159 OF THE LINOS OF THE SAN JACINTO LANDS ASSOCIATION. AS SHOWN ON A MAP TEAEOF RECORDED IN BOOK B. PAGE 357 OF MAPS. RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA LOCATED IN SECTION 32, T./S.. ROW, S.B.M. K & A ENGINEERING, INC. JANUARY. 2004 TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY TIT ACCORDING ro THE RECORDS OF MS MINCE'. AS OF INS DATE THERE UMWALAL OR LOCAL TAXER OE SPFJSALLENS MANSE ME PROPERTY .ASSESSMENTS ON E 0:EL MAP AS UNPAAXES. STATE COUNT', COIECNO AE TAXES. °SEPTMI TART OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED A5 TARS. NOW A LIEU BUT NOT VET PAVANE MINK ARE ESIIMAIED TO BE f DATED: 2004 PAL MCDONNE L. COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR BT DEPUTY TAX BOND CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND N THE SUM OF f HAS BEEN I:STON ED AND FILED NTH THE BOND CF SUPENNSOBS OF RE CQINTY OF RIVERSIDE. CONFORMAL CONITTI COED UPON TOE PAYMENT OF AL TABS, STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL AND ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TRIES. 'ARCH AT THE TIME OF THE RUNG OF MS MAP NTH ME COUNTY RECORDER ARE A LIEN A0ANST SAD PROPERTY BUT NOT YET PAYABLE AND SAW BOND HAS BEEN OILY APPOSED BY SAD BOND OF SUPERVISORS DATED: 2004 NANCY ROMERO CLERK 10 ROE BOARD OF SUPERNSOS CAOI TAX BOND PILL MCDONEELL CWNTY TAX COLLECTOR B BY: DEPUTY DEPUTY I HEREBY STATE RAT I HAM: EXAMINED THE MRON ARMED HAP; THAT THE 910GN90N MOOT HEREON 5 SUBSTANTIALLY THE SINE AS R APPEARED ON ME IMAMS MAP: THAT ALL THE PROMPTS OF THE SUOONSOY MAP ACT AND OF THE STY OF SAN JACINTO ORDNANCE N0. 673 HAVE BEEN COMPILED NTH. AND I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS IMP 5 TECHNICALLY CORRECT AS PROM. DRIED: ) - - 0 FOR HAKE M. MUILAN, RCE 35163 CITY ETN MEN, OTT OF SW JACINTO I2011FIWI41 ? METRES 12/31/2004 0450 pilaw WORKS DIRECTOR APPROVAI THE STREET DEDICATORS 910WN C TIE WITHIN ANNEXED MAP ARE HEREBY APPROVED TIE OAT OF 2014. SOILS REPORT A PREEMPT SOILS MITT IW FEDI PREMED BY WOMN FOUNDATION ENDI D, NC OR VANE 211E DM. AS RETUNED DY RE HEµ9 NO SAFETY CEDE O MEMO . SECTION 119u SHEET 1 OF 5 SHEETS RECORDER'S STATFMF& FILET TES _ BAY or 2004 AT M D BOOT - ON ARMS AT PAGES = AT PE REQUEST OF IRE OTT amK. N0. FEE GARY L ORSO COUNTY ASSESSOR - CLEAN - RECORDER BY: DEPUTY S UMPAS104 GUARANTEE NORTH AMERICAI 1111E O111PANY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT I HERMIT STATE TIT I AM A LAND SIMPER OF THE STATE OF CAI 0011* MID THAT TORS LOP CORSSRNG Cr FIE (SON MEETS CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURREY MADE ENDUE NY N 9IPET0OI DURING JANUARY OF ENS THAT ALL NOMINFNIS 910WH HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST AND T1EIR POPTONS ARE CORRECTLY 91OMi T WILL RE N ACCORDANCE MR TIE TAWS OF TIE MONUMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE MAP. TIE MONUMENTS COWL BE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY ro BE RETRACED. TE SURVEY IS TRUE AND COMPETE AS 9101141. 2004 YLLUAM R. KNIGHT. ILL 6610 SPIRES 09-30-54 DATED: 34.41. Iz Cm CCTPT*NCF STATEMENT TIE art OF SAN JACN11), COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STATE OF CAUFONIA BY AND THROUGH ITS DULY ATMOR150 OFFICERS AT A REGULAR MEMO ON 2003, KNEW, APPROVES SAD RNµ MAP AD ACCEPTS THE DEDICATIONS SHORN HEREON 110* PUBLIC ROAD, PUBLIC DOMES, LANDSCAPE, PAN. IWNNAGE(PIB POE,ll lUWB . TIE ACCEPTANCE CF THE OFER W UEDICATIN OF OTY STREETS IS CONTINGENT UPON TIE COMREIlO1 OF AL STREET IMPS:SEEN'S. DATED TM DAY OF MAYOR ATTEST OM OF SAN JACNTO CITY OF SAN JACINTO COY CLERK PENNING [O USNATN STATILETIT 1N5 MAP, TRACT NO 30462-1 5 WN TI 4 PR1OF E MCRµ TENTATIE MM OF TRACT NO. W 362 SAID TENTATIVE TRACT YM WAS APPROVED 0Y THE CITY OF 5M JACINTO PLANNING 01CORIISPOI N ACCORDANCE 1MM THE LAW IN A INKY AUTHOMM ZED E1410 RED MUCH 13. 2. CLOY OF SAN A Nro. DAFORMA SECRETARY. CLOY OF 5M JACINTO PANNING COMMISSION DATED T195 DAY OF , 2004. VICINITY HAP N.TS. SURVEYOR'S NOTES 1. ME BASIS OF SMARMS FOR T115 IMP IS THE G01181 E OF SANDERSON AVENUE TOTEM AS 110006'58'E PER RIB 213/100. 2. TRACT N0. 30482-1 HAS 103 LOIS PLUS COTS A' 1NR0008 '01. NCLI2,1. 3. TRACT NO 30482-1 COHERE 33.22 OR. AG1ES BUNN THE 01511EICOVE BORDER. ALL PUBLIC U11UIIES I/O NEE RACES INSTALLED WONN IRIS TRACT ]HALL BE PLACED UNDERGRNNO. 5. 1' 0.0. NON PPE W/ MASTIC NIA0 STAMPED IS 6810' SET P11191 AT ALL. REAR LOT CORNERS, UNLESS NOTED OINOWLg 6. LOT CORNERS ADJACENT TO slNrtln REFERENCED D LEAD & TAD, 15 0810' ON TOP 00 CURB AT TIE PROIDNDATBN OF LOT SINES. 7. 0 INDICATES TYPE 'A' MONUMENT. STAMPED IS W10'. SET FLUSH, PER RSV. CO. 510. NO. 903. UIDE S NOTED OT ERREE 8. INDICATES TEE D' MONUMENT. STAMPED 'LS 6810'. SET FLUSH, PER RN. CO. STD. N0. 90.2 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 9. • NYG1E5 FOUND NONUSER. SUE AND DESCRIPTION AS NOTED. 10. 'P.U.E' PECANS P9BUC MUFF EASEMENT DEDICATED HEREON DATA REFERENCE R1 - NEGATES RECORD DATA PER P119 27/10. R2 - INOIDAIFS RECORD DATA PER FEB 28/100. R3 - INDICATES RECORD DATA PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CWP91TIOn DISTRCI we OF SLCIRN 32, T.45., RAW.. SEM. NOTE: RECORD DISTANCES SHORN NE 441.615IED GROUND D1TNC6, OF TE CALIFORNN COMDNATE ESTFL. ZONE 6. LEASER COIEOTRML PROJECTION. R4 - INOVATFS RECORD DATA PER RB 40/92-93. R5 - INDICATES RECORD DATA PIER RB 13/W. RB - INDICATES RECORD DATA PER NMI 9/68. EASEMENT NOTES 1. A ROW OF WAY EASEMENT N FAVOR OF SN4 JAGMD .010 ASSOOATKN. I6 3'w5`R50125 OR 4556342 FOR WADS I/O FOR 11E CONSTRUCTION MD WNIUWICE OF ALL NECESSARY WATER PIPES AND DITCHES, FLUMES AND CONDUITS, FOR ALL PURPOSES OF IAAEATKA4 AND DEESE USE; TIE MCI LOCATION THEREOF NOT •REG DISCLOSED 9Y RECORD. IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 30462-1 BONG A SUBONBION OF A PORTION THE WEST HALF OF FIRM LOT 158 OF THE LANDS OF THE SARI JACINTO LANDS IASSOCNTNN. AS SHOWN ON A IMP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK B, PACE 357 OF MAPS. RECORDS OF 5AN DIEGO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA. LOCATED IN SECTION 32. T.45.. R1W., 5.911. K i A ENGINEERING, INC. JANUARY. 2004 4'1-.55£ 7 --�- 1.z278• 1 660R2 144 'A'__ la Y� El. 1. LP. W/ PLASTIC PLUG. ESTAB ED BY Pg 90 91 92 93 94 BS BB SINGLE PROPORTION. G I; 4 n n UNREADMRE. 181.02' PER RM. CO. TB 99 16. KCEPIE) AS GE COR MIDI LOT 159 M61 11E CL I81ERSECIEN PER PUB 211/100. ESFABUSNED BY SINGLE PROPORTION. 860.78' 1321.32' (1321.54' 41 is 42) N 99'54'27' W 1321.41' PAHCa 4 dAt Q A� ir SANDERSON AVENUE N OO'06'56' E 2E143.27' (2643.48' R1 k R2) (2643.41' R3) (2642.45' R5) i ?E ,0 �m ESTABLISHED BY SINGLE PROPORTION. L1 97 98 99 08.14 SHEET 2 OF 5 SHEETS CAWSTON AVENUE FO. 1 - RON RUC. DN. 16', PER PUB 13/90 & R.GF.CAW.CD.NAP OF SEC. 32 T.45.. RAW.. 52.1 L µU l/L W 1/NIER1DNCC. 32 C a ry F0. 1 I/4' LP. TAGGED N IWD Y111 PER PM9 53 & RCE.C.&W.C.O. DAP SEC. OF SEG 32, T.45,. RI W. SBA.. N r FOR THE N I/1 CSEC. 32 AND CA WI 11N. LW 'C 100 101 80 66 S 75 74' 85 BO 77 72 *IFu 79 7B 71 70 69 102 64 62 61 103 160.00' N0006.5EE x� i'o wu 'a 58.68' N0008 566.0 .y Oi 13 ^F Ie 5 52 53 54 55 58 57 59 59 W GRASSY MEADOW DRIVE Lot 'E' 50 49 45 0 0 47/ L4 1166.1IY N 00'0T25' E 2643.12' (2443.32' R1 & R2) 0 100 FD. 1 1 4' I.P. TAGGED. IS 90..W. FUER IN CON PER PEI 193/34-5 FORG FOR THE SE GDR. FIRS/ LOT 150 NO THE 12. GRAPHIC SCALE SOME 1' Y. 200' 48 5 20 19 40 42 39 43 44 45 39 37 IgElk 33 34 31 N u29 28 2 3 4 5 36 ♦ l 2 22 23 P4 7 6 LB SWEEP GIVER t 18 17 18 15 14 13 1 N 07'53' E 2542.97 (2643.1E R1 h R2) (2643.27' R3) (2643.00' RB) KIRBY STREET PM 5221 P D 814.24' TEL CRASS COURT ESTABUSEm BY SINGLE PART PROPORTION. W. 1' LP. TAGGED. 15 WED'. RUSK NO REF., ACCEPTED N THE NE CDR FNN LOT 159 MID T8E CL INTERSECTION PER 23/ PLB 26/IO 1; rc N 00'03'02' E 2643.87' (2643.97' R3) (2644.01' R4) pO 0006641 PK' R9L ^® MC I4ET *NM. CA. INIERSECTION Al40 THE HIV �� CORNER FARM 100 159 F4 UI TEL yIIII', UNE DATA N0. 9FNN0 DISTANCE LI NKTO6'S8'E 20.W' 12 N6763T4'W 10.00' 13 N0ODC56'E 319' L4 NO0•06'00'E 9751' L5 ostroettfw 103.08 11 NO0'06'W'E 10.66' L7 N6854'00'8 189]4' NAPE ORA lE n li Nose WOW a0' etsn 0EIM'4H s10C1.lr NC On` INAS LOE DATA N6 u 52 WANG NNIIeat all• GRAPHIC SCALE b 90 1 240 NOTE SEE SHEET 2 FOR SURVEYOR'S NOTES. DATA INFERENCE NOTES AND EASEMENT NOTM. INDICATES EASEMENT FOR PONDING PURPOSES DEDICATED HEREON. SEE SHEET 4 IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CAUFORNIA TRACT NO. 30462-1 BEING A SIEq*501 OF A PORTION THE W61 IP F OF MN LOT 159 OF TIE LMOS OF THE SIN JAONIO LAWS ASSOa9pN. AS SHORN ON A WP THEREOF RECORDED N BOOK B. PILE 357 OF NAPS. RECORDS OF SW OEGO OR M. FNTNWN. LOCATED IN SEDIKIN 02. L4S, RAW. SHY K & A ENGINEERING. INC. JANUARY. 2004 SEE SHEET 5 53 54 55 56 57 55 53 53 / 133 04 GRASSY MEADOW ORNE �. �qq1 „\ R , A -- Karam k+ our �-"°°11 1 nLm ''tao' LOT 'E �nr 10�Ii; ��— I 31 lrzw' �ei!e' NK/0i'0'E i ' -� 4 �- 1 IeYO'Yi Mg 1 XOOOFYE Mgr 1 ' 3 4 //1 Im®Y2 MAY SW IOW -.NI NSW sur 'TM sv v' 40k>o•E t'4 3`+'44 32 71 ua•sc ''.p.'T+y;� amMFert 4 so # egg Sr. >i$ 41 Mae ss. $ jII' eme ss. TO01 ss. ! $ 1 g F Ogg ss. O 6 A i h n21 sr. a �U g _.. IWOOeiet n.m -�tj P E k NIraEMst 1rz1C-N000]1'C 10MM' p . Kamer ,1M00' p@ ` 1,501 i,,.w 00 ��ry®$ i, sP,'3 g L! 4 - R e ; Iplmrt 1@K 42 R me SF. d�1W�m. --Poi 4 0 15n� INMe S.F. Maness. a"'uj. ` z 'SJ:NAMIllgEfr:::::14S. E 33 .�4mm ss.�JB�$i'�'I1°A 21'tlp•� �YA• 1Y is% c�amMu.My' N9t4Y 111VOSJ E 1MLp'g1Rm•D41@M'9 a1N]POSTEtws•'ag NmaosE,NamxmacxE+135 ,$. 6 �+4R 7 0 �`' A7 3B y ktTk29 4;J ;�n ss. S`s)£umgty-_£�-zyiA sr. k etas ss. ss. n k esa sr. A ,e ik �I s`�rf'�rmsrRR B1+,6MTM�${�'6 e ��i �. ,, q Qt q �j �Y'I,h ! L 1W01TE 1641r 1 15°— 6 VA TN b. S kph$ aY L vita,. {�'4. S b AMA• mr hl �d e¢oD M} m�A>ti �: Pxtwt'M i A'Np,. o-a1.39.4 �,{E�y"! tOLp 1� • Ry 1 ‘..A. MS. Sr. yl 1.1 S.45 i 7Aa 45 0 R weis0. IOW SF. 1 li IDa0 SE S. MA 8/357, &Q. C0. SHEET 3 OF 5 SHEETS GRAPHIC SCALE 0 30 60 1 2 NOTE: SEE SIEET 2 FOR SURVEYORS NOTES. DATA REFERENCE NOTES AND EASEMENT NOTE. IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CAIJFORNIA TRACT NO. 30462-1 FOCC A SImDMS0N OF A PORT ON PC WEST HALF OF FNW2 LOY lap OF 11E WES OF TIE SALT .601T0 LINOS ASSOCLAIICM, AS SRAM ON A WP 114MOF RECOPIED N BOOR 4 PALE 357 61 1e1PS. RECORDS OF SAN DECO COLMIY, CALOOIEA LOCATED N SECTION 32. TAS., M11W., S.0JL K & A ENGINEERING. INC. JANUARY. 2004 nor I 1Wvarare p _� /Wad LOT A� NOM'E a14'p0 n noC 90 I >; g 73311 SF.110002781 • nm I AKOA3e2 LEl se 7303 S.F. 72ar N 0000301 IO1M 9300 S.F. 110823' E vavo'ss. g 01 1 7032 SANDERSON LOT 'C' g7200 sr. Ate M 94 N mar 11000Y1e' F 11370 1320212 5 95 d 72vv v. AVENUE 15005'55i now' LOT 'B' mA 110Vf65e' F • 96 3 7300 32. g 706' SWEET CLOVER LOOP '�"` "°O1' M 006511' E 316118 m _ ,e— aae r _ IE100E 18232 ' N011233L IDSf0 O E 3yy1311 �/; 92 3gm'/till q ]j A \ vY' 8310 5 e'AS.F. IISA R 0i6 113N ( 5 C 7M6 SF. j lour eoormt 84 7245Sf. m9t 90 flu SP. IIOWm 6a'eel. 1000' ai 20.02 6000165. E 332 L L'f !6] R3 31267, &O. CO. mar LOT 'C' 1°nce 74 E'24ar'"la§r'>s. R3r • P 5 h g 7374 F. 2 71A 7120' g52 73a1 SF. 710' i' 5 R R M11, 1vlav rr3r• iN/ °" e3ae S 69 9010 3.2 0o?o SF. g 9. 71.A 53 g 73HSF.��I 71s' 1333 7120' • b 54 3 g 7334 SS. g 7132 7130' g73.31 Sf. 7130' SHEET 4 OF 5 SHEETS Aa 1311.18. ] 1000696E ISIaF� 66 34 59 i LOT 'E 6 O00HW E 71035' b N COMIC E en31' OlaCtr GRASSY MEADOW DRIVE 411 SEE SHEET 3 SEE SHEET 5 GRAPHIC SCALE 2 SCALE 1' - W NOTE: SEE SHEET 2 FOR SURVEYOR'S ND1ES, DATA REFERENCE NOBS NID EASEMENT NOTE IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RNERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 30462-1 BERG A SOBWASIDN OF A FURROW 11E WEST RALF OF FARM LOT 15B OF THE 1/NOS OF OE SIN JACINTO IANOS ASSOLVMNIN. AS SNDIRI ON A 1W 11FIEOF RECORDED IN BOOK B. PACE 357 OF EW'S, RECORDS OF SIN DEOO COMTE. CANFDNOI LOCATED W SECRON 3; TAi NiW_ S.BJL K & A ENGINEERING, INC. JANUARY 2004 SEE SHEET 3 SHEET 5 OF 5 SHEETS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 30462-1 BONG A SUBON1510N OF A PORTION THE WEST HALF OF FARM LOT 159 OF THE LANDS OF THE SAN JACINTO LANDS ASSOCIATION. AS SHOWN ON A IMP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOON 5. PAGE 357 OF IMPS. RECORDS OF SAN DECO COUNTY. C41ORM4 LOCATED 01 SECTION 32. T.45.. R1W.. S.B.M. K & A ENGINEERING, INC. JANUARY, 2004 SANDERSON AVENUE N 00'06'56' E 2643.27' (2643.48' 51 & R2) (2643.41' R3) (2642.45' ES) 559.67 - 142276' ( FO. 1' LP. W/ P14511G PLUG, 1 5 j., 86 1NRDDA8LE. DR 02 ESTABLISHED BY "y PER RN. co. T8 99/16. SINGLE PROPORTION. FR ACCEPTED AS THE 5W COR. FAAN LOT 159 BB DE CL ITERr'ETON PER PAM 25/10. CAWSTON S\ AVENUE njl _ iA 1 To n D1. 16'C.F. PER P0. *6 t 13/90 Rti. T.4I.C.O. MW K SEC. 32. 911.. RAW. SB. 3 FOR TIE W 1/4 CAR . 32 AMI C/L INR]iSEC110N. C N FD. 1 1/1. LP. TAGGED • n T'd z IN PMB� 3pER 8 MAP OF SEC. 32. T.45.. RAW.. S.BY.. FOR M N 14 CCR SEC. 32 1 1321.31" (132154' R1 & R2) ESTABUSHET BY awJ F PROPORRON. S6U.78' 1321.32' (1321.54' RI & R2) N 3W54'37* W 1321.41' FARCEL 4 41, F0. 1 1/4' LP. TAGGED. is ease. num. IN CONO. PER RIB 195/34-9 FOR FOR THE SE COI. FARM LOT 159 A40 111E GI. IMEASECIWN. Lot ESTABLISHED BY ANGLE PROPORTION. 89 88 Lot g Lot 'C ✓ 1158.10' N 00'07'25' E 2543.12' (264332' 01 & R2) 91 B3 84 85 86 92 93 82 81 80 94 95 96 97 96 99 00 101)1 SWEET CLOVER LOOP Lot 'G' 79 78 17 1109065565E 51 U y B is8 72 52 71 53 67 BB 70 54 66 2 .= 85 0 8 62 69 55 64 56 57 i 103 61 58 59 60 4 GRASSY EADOW Lot 'E' 50 P 49 48 47 t GRAPHIC SCALE O 1Boo A'iNE 20' 46 41 40 44 37 21 19 18 22 .3 36 23 24 SWEET 32 4 31 30 29 4 CLOVER�E,\\9 17 16 15 ) N 0707'S3" E 2642.97' (2643.15' R1 & R2) (2643.27' R3) (2643.00' R6) EITBY STREET 14 13 814.24' _ V TALL GRASS COU9T ESTABLISHED 91 SINGLE PARCEL 1 PRDPO . E5 8085'. FLUSH. NO REF.. ACCEPTED AS THE NE CDR. FARM LOT 159 AND 111E CL W18 28/4UN PER PR)15287 PliA3 / 543 4I N 00"0$02T E 2643.87 (2643.97' R3) (2644.01' R4) qo p W FOUND 15 ul1•.RLSH. 'Y� 0 N0. REF. ACCEPTED A9 C/L EErrI INIElIgCIION AND 111E NW CORNER OF FNIII ▪ E3 PER P159 25/100 !N 959 V SHEET 1 Of 1 SHEET VICINITY MAP N.TS. LNE DATA N0. DEMING &STNCE L1 N0906'S6'E 200' L2 /08SY04Y2 10.00' L3 NOW06'S6'E 31.32' 14 NO011800"E 97.51' L5 118W54'01T 10E00' L6 110906'00'E 1056' 11 N88543011' 16034• ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTES' ALL BIA1409 9WL BE LONSM1CNT MM GLI M 9 wTAML As PER IRE CILIFORM 91ADEIC COLS TE 16591ED w1EA smog. 0,0104G FIRE 1905005, 9W1 BE 06TN1ID N05 ADDP10 81 THE 11791059841E WATER AMC/ TIER 1D ANT 0105161101E ELODNB 11AI61ML RACED ON NI 9101WOYL LOT. OWL EMU? RED REQUESTINO Tom REVISIONS 6mn DEATW ON AGENDA ITEM 6 February 5, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer SUBJECT: Ramona Boulevard/Sanderson Avenue Waterline — Project No. 02- 008 RECOMMENDATION: By motion, award public works contract to Utah Pacific Construction Company for the sum of $385,450, and 15% contingency; reject all other bids received; and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. BACKGROUND: On November 20, 2003, Council authorized staff to advertise for construction of Ramona Boulevard/Sanderson Avenue Waterline Installation. Bids opened on January 26, 2004, with six bids received ranging from $385,450.00 to $908,020.00. (staffs estimate is $700,000.00). This project is Phase II of De Anza Lift Station, Gravity Sewer, Force Main, and Water Main, which includes installation of approximately 11,800 L.F. of 12" waterline along Sanderson Avenue and Ramona Boulevard. As you may be aware, partial installation of waterline was done in conjunction with Phase I of this project. With the installation of this waterline, the system will be operational and property owners will be able to connect to this new system. Due to the considerable difference in bid costs received, staff and EMWD have contacted Utah Pacific Construction Company to confirm their bid. We are also memorializing our conversation with both EMWD and the contractor as to minimize future misunderstandings. Appr ap City Manager: (\\\ Finance Director: Page 1 of 2 Utah Pacific Construction Company has performed work for EMWD; this company recently completed a 12" PVC line, a 24" PVC line, and a 30" PVC line for EMWD, and according to EMWD their work is satisfactory. Timeline for this project is as follows: o Mandatory Start of Construction — February 23, 2004 o Expected Project Completion — June 21, 2004 JUSTIFICATION: Installation of water line facilities along Sanderson Avenue and Ramona Boulevard will facilitate the development of this general area, and implement the Council's Goals and Objectives. BUDGETARY IMPACT: Adequate funding is included in current Fiscal Year Budget 03-04, as project No. 02-008, which include federal grant and EMWD contribution ATTACHMENTS: 1. Summary of Bids Received 2. Project Map Page 2 of 2 Ramona Boulevard/Sanderson Avenue Waterline Bid Opening - January 26, 2004 - 2:00 p.m. Company Name Bid Amount Bid Bond Utah Pacific Const. Co. $385,450.00 J Choctaw Contractors, Inc. $490,774.00 J Genesis Construction $525,777.00 J SRD Engineering $703,670.00 J Sean Malek Eng. & Co., Inc. $846,000.00 J KEC Engineering $908,020.00 J RAMIO\ A EXPY 0 tt ri a 3 Cil La Z. 0. z� 66 COTTON OOD IESPLAVADE } AVENUE E— z cn VICINITY MAP PROJECT SITE RAMONA MAIN ST. / \ ESPLANADE AVENUE H WY. 74 AGENDA ITEM 5, 7 February 5, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Bernie SimorY, Finance Director SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution of Initiation of Lighting, Landscaping, Park District No.1 (LLPD#1) Assessment for FY 2004-05 RECOMMENDATION: By motion, adopt Resolution of Initiation ordering District Engineer to prepare and to file a report related to maintenance of public improvements in City of San Jacinto Lighting, Landscaping Park District No. 1 for the FY 2004-2005 Property Tax Roll. BACKGROUND: For this purpose, District Engineer refers to the Consulting Civil Engineering firm of GFB-Friedrich, Inc., who will be the assessment engineer. The Assessment District is divided among five zones with assessments involving over 9,000 individual parcels. Resolution of Initiation starts the assessment procedure in action for the FY 2004-2005 tax roll that would be adopted on or about July 2004. No new parcels are being annexed into LLPD #1, with the exception of those tracts or APNs already conditioned to join LLPD#1 or infill projects in the older areas. Staff will present the Engineer's Report for approval and set a public hearing date for any public protest or input when such report is available. Should there be no majority protest, City Council may then adopt a resolution confirming a diagram and authorizing the levy of assessments in LLPD#1 at the following meeting. LLPD#1 is a pre -proposition 218 district that has no cost escalation clause. The maximum assessment cannot be increased without a vote of landowners. City Manag Finance Director: ///AM, 1,1 1 JUSTIFICATION: Starts annual work on annual assessment district levy required by California Streets and Highways Code section 22622. BUDGETARY IMPACT: No cost is attributed by this action. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution oflnitiation-LLPD#1 Resolution No. 2 • • SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET • • EXHIBIT ^A" • BOUNDARY MAP LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 1 Vat a lint LEGEND .+vn w^e e44 mr Enna' al. Eawl tor th. CITY OF SAN JACINTQ FISCAL YEAR 2003-04 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) RESOLUTION NO: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CITY ENGINEER TO PREPARE AND TO FILE A REPORT RELATED TO MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 1, AND ANY ASSESSMENT THEREON FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-05 WHEREAS, heretofore the City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No.1 was created pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code ( §22500, et. seq.); and WHEREAS, California Streets and Highways Code §22622 provides that this Council shall adopt a resolution generally describing any proposed new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements in such a district and ordering the City Engineer to prepare and file a report related to annual maintenance and assessment in such a district; and WHEREAS, no new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements are proposed for said Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 1; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, as follows: Section 1: Section 2: The Recitals, as set forth in Part A of this Resolution, are in all respects true and correct. The City Engineer, or designated District Engineer, hereby is ordered and directed to prepare an annual report as specified in California Streets and Highways Code §§22565, et. seq., with respect to City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No.1 for Fiscal Year 2004-05 Section 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Passed, Adopted and Approved this 5th day of February, 2004. ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, City of San Jacinto City of San Jacinto By Jim Ayres, Mayor CERTIFICATE I, Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto held on the 5th day of February, 2004, by the following vote: 2004. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 5th day of February, Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk 2 AGENDA ITEM 5, 8 February 5, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Bernie Simon, Finance Director SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy and Collection for Lighting, Landscaping, Park District No.2 (LLPD#2) Annual Assessments for FY 2004-05 RECOMMENDATION: By motion, Adopt Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy and Collection for Lighting, Landscaping, Park District No.2 (LLPD#2) Annual Assessments for FY 2004-05 and ordering District Engineer to prepare and to file a report related to maintenance of public improvements in City of San Jacinto Lighting, Landscaping Park District No. 2 (LLPD#2) for the FY 2004-2005 Property Tax Roll BACKGROUND: For this purpose, District Engineer refers to the Consulting Civil Engineering firm of GFB-Friedrich, Inc. The Assessment District is divided among the original area and ten annexation areas called zones with assessments involving over 1,500 individual parcels. There are currently another six zones in progress to be annexed with approximately another 700 parcels. Resolution of Initiation starts the legal procedure so that the City may eventually place LLPD#2 assessments on the FY 2004-2005 tax roll. Staff will present the Engineer's Report for approval and set a public hearing date for any public protest or input when such report is available. Should there be no majority protest, City Council may then adopt a resolution confirming a diagram and authorizing the levy of assessments in LLPD#2 at the following meeting. LLPD#2 is a post proposition 218 district. In future years, assessments could be increased by the CPI, not to exceed 7.5%, but never above the actual costs incurred to maintain the facilities of the district. City Manager. Finance Director: JUSTIFICATION: Starts annual work on Assessment District required by California Streets and Highways Code section 22622. BUDGETARY IMPACT: No cost is attributed by this action. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution of Initiation-LLPD#2 Resolution No. 2 rr EXHIBIT "A" BOUNDARY MAP LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2 for the CITY OF SAN JACINTO LEGEND r J .�usswn mma m.cu. City of San Jacinto Lighting Landscape Assessment District #2 Original Area and Annexations through Zone 10 • Zone 1 and 1A — Sagecrest Development — State/Chase/Sagecrest — 255 Units Zone 2 — CNH/Empire Homes — Washington/Meridian — 90 Units Zone 3 — Diaz Dev - - Cottonwood /Kirby — 69 Units Zone 4 — Osborne Development — Evans/Las Rosas - 37 units Zone 5 — Osborne Development — Ramona Blvd/Savory Lane — 65 Units • Zone 6 — Canaday Development — Cottonwood/Palm — 66 Units ▪ Zone 7 — JD Pierce Development — Cottonwood/Kirby — 249 Units • Zone 8 — Lennar Homes — Kirbyl7th St. — 337 units Zone 9 — CNHNantage Development - San Jacinto St/Ramona Expressway — 225 Units Zone 10 — Western Pacific — Rancho San Jacinto — 177 Units STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss CITY OF SAN JACINTO ) RESOLUTION NO: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING THE DISTRICT'S ENGINEER TO PREPARE AND TO FILE A REPORT RELATED TO MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK DISTRICT NO. 2, AND ANY ASSESSMENT THEREON FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-05 WHEREAS, heretofore the City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No.2 was created pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Califomia Streets and Highways Code ( §22500, et. seq.); and WHEREAS, California Streets and Highways Code §22622 provides that this Council shall adopt a resolution generally describing any proposed new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements in such a district and ordering the District's Engineer to prepare and file a report related to annual maintenance and assessment in such a district; and WHEREAS, no new improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements are proposed for said Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No. 2 (LLPD#2); and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined and ordered by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, as follows: Section 1: Section 2: The Recitals, as set forth in this Resolution, are in all respects true and correct. The District's Engineer hereby is ordered and directed to prepare an annual report as specified in California Streets and Highways Code §§22565, et. seq., with respect to City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No.2 for Fiscal Year 2004- 05. 1 Section 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Passed, Adopted and Approved this 5th day of February, 2004. ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney, City of San Jacinto City of San Jacinto By Jim Ayres, Mayor CERTIFICATE I, Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do certify that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto held on the 5th day of February 2004, by the following vote: 2004. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 5th day of February, Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk 2 AGENDA ITEM rp.% February 5, 2004 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Peter A. Cosentini, City Manager SUBJECT: Painting of City Hall RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council give direction on Council Member Shaw's request. BACKGROUND: Council Member Ken Shaw has requested that an item be placed in the Council agenda to discuss the painting of City Hall. Council Members Shaw has suggested using development agreement fee moneys to paint City Hall. Certainly, these funds can be used in any way the Council sees fit. They are considered general fund unrestricted moneys. I have recommended to Council to use these funds for our deficit situation. However, the Council has declined the recommendation and has asked for a report back on how to use these moneys in relation to the specific traffic and road issues surrounding the developments that generated the money. It is estimated that this staff report shall come before the City Council at the second meeting in February along with the mid -year budget report. This is the current time frame goal. I would not recommend to the Council that we use these funds for the painting of City Hall, due to our financial position. JUSTIFICATION: Enhance the aesthetics of our newly renovated Downtown area. BUDGETARY IMPACT: The estimated cost of painting City Hall is between $4,000 and $5,000.00. This includes some stucco work. City Manager: Page 1 of 2 Finance Director: ATTACHMENTS: None Page 2 of 2 12/22/2003 10:51 9090000000 NO PAGE 01 FA TO: /te a e / G BF .1: DATE: /'Y/iv FROM: �`^.A✓ PAGES: / Central County United Way 2587 S. San Jacinto Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 909/929-9691 FAX/909-652-0064 MESSAGE: n�£,sv , Including Cover Sheet T Mai 4 17fz, K0 H-1 � Dc✓0L p O -T See us on the Web at CCUW.ORG Mayor opened at 7:07 Present: Ayres, Conner, Carlson-Buydos, Shaw Absent: Dale Invocation Sauter Pledge Bob Otta Special Presentations Public Comments Joan Berggan, representing Alexandru family — she introduced family — explained she believes the problem is with the Alexandru property. In 20 yrs haven't had a residential burn that fit this rule. Has had several deals that fell through. Adrian Alexandru, would like CC to speed up this process. Has been trying to sell past 2 yrs. Mortgage company always decline. Explain expenses of family 5 children 1 on the way oldest in college. Len Souza, 1305 Free Mark Court, here to talk about 3 items Park Hill development, dust, Hearing lot of construction early in morning; doesn't believe developers are making the dust. Cosentini explained punative dust and what they are doing to control dust. Condition of Park Ave — doesn't know what is going on between City of San Jacinto and Hemet. Dividing line is center of road. That road is in such bad shape drives it 2X per day. Hoping CC will get the developers to take care of it. Patch on patch, needs Complemented CC on being well prepared and working hard for the city in the few of the cc meetings Perry Hewitt, 1093 Rinehart St, present cc and Mayor opinions he has heard and he does not support out sourcing pd. He believes first priority is fire & police. We have pd that has ownership and would like to keep it. Maureen Williamson, Main St, update on signatures gathered to keep pd now have 1096. Consensus Not a referendum just concerned. Her concern is for her and childrens safety. Concerned citizens have not taken any money by the pd or others. In655 dividuals spending their own money, printing. I 0so1 NO• a5(0 6-7- tit 11 d511 Bob Ottta, 655 E Main St Sp #92, thanked the city on behalf of mh park owners. Trees have been trimmed. Thanked cc courtesy shown to him and He and his wife moving Belin NM in 6 mos to yr. Appreciates other courtesies. Sam Gaines, 895 Torino Ave SJ, Address the audience (faced them) felt like a viganlante party as he came to mtg. Not sure that is the way to accomplish what they are trying to do. Asked cc be allowed to make a good decision for sj. Lives on the other side of the river. 3 vehicles stolen in community next to Soboba Golf Course. Giving them CC opportunity to do their job. John Hunt, 1130 Commonwealth, SJ moved 6 yrs ago, counts on pd — supported current mayor in replacing previous cc. If money cut corners some where else, lived in 8 different homes around the cnty, believes criminal to get rid of police force. Public Hearing 3.1 Resolution initial CFD 2003-1 Annex No 2 Jeff Ballinger, intro. Public Hearing opened at 7:30 Clerk no comments no one in audience to speak Mayor moved Shaw 2n passes 4/0 City Depts 4.1 Traffic Calming Standards Motlagh gave staff report: Last disc at 12/4/04 mtg — there presented with traffic engineers report and then went to subcommittee, met 1/12/04 and made recommendation to CC . In relating policy city wide, improvents that want installed need to gather petition signed by the homeowners adjouning st. and only local road, 40' width and 800' length min. also street grade should not exceed 5% slope, site distance evaluated, & cc makes final determination on each request. Warwick, Roanke, & , input from citizens. Did some signage, extra police patrol. No budget. Cc to determine where to get Conner — 51 % of the residents, questioned if it shouldn't include feeder streets; concern is raised by those presenting signatures, Conners believes should be neighborhood. Ayres — subcommittee noted this neighborhood should be surveyed but everything else in Warwick & Roaneke are cul de sacs. Chris — some type of notice and for those directly impacted which are those are the ones on the street. Due process available, didn't want to be distruptive to neighborhood. Ayres — this is pilot program. Chris — adopt standard - 4 listed are consistent problem with accidents incl personal injury 2nd part would be so that developers now can design to not have speed humps or pay to have them installed. Her recommendation is that jump start and standard be adopted. Conner ? Savory — only 4 houses yet all the traffic comes from cul de sacs. Chris - Savory was not supposed to be a through street. Disc. Ayres — questioned about how petition will be done. $40,000 out of developers fees supports that funding can cm approve contracts — Habib — cm could. No public comment Ayres support as presented. Strong support of speed humps from neighborhood meetings, tried a variety to slow people down that have not worked. Chris moved to approved as city policy at 4 locations & allocate $40,000 from development fund. Passes 4/0 4.2 Fire Stations Barron during 12/18 mtg looked at proposed sites at build out approx 20 yrs. With overhead address realignlment of Hwy 79. Have incl future roadways anticipated. Reviewed handouts. Response study for proposed stations. Barron suggested new downtown station — has better response time. Ea station has 2.5 min radius. Looking into future, state can't guarantee existing mission from current site. Potentially could partner with college that has pluses for state and city. Very comfortable with this plan and believe cc comments were considered and worked with proposed Hwy 79 alignment. Will need future truck co. and can do that at esplanade and Hewitt. Ayres noted a ladder truck won't fit in current facility. Barron parat of reason for recommending new fire station at Hewitt at esplanade, $850,000 dollar investment needs to be housed inside. 2 acres needs for each stations Need of battalion fire chief to serve as fire marchall when 3 station added. Would like to come back with zoning map and see what is available. Ayres — encourage staff to find 2 acres on west end. Cottonwood & Sanderson Chris — staff listed in report — Peter responded staffing is consistent in CFD report and direction. On Sanderson n at is that not a bridge — verified info correct. Conner — new map appreciates thoroughness. College station will run out property. Suggested land banking all sites. Cottonwood open. State street limited land. Doesn't know how we are going to build kitties to designate now rather than 20 years from now when prices have doubled or tripled. Cosentini — secure property in areas that might be scarce soon. Three levels expense, land, people, building — staff will bring back Chris moved to approve and direct staff investigate 2nd site and securing all sites, Conner 2nd passes 4/0 4.3 Traffic Reports Motlagh gave staff report — apologized traffic eng. Had emergency and couldn't be here. So he will present. Arkage Eng — 3 sep traffic reports. Ayres — intersection at Idyllwild and State is most concerned from input he has rec'd from citizens. And noted Dale was concerned about speed on Main. Motlagh spoke with him and he noted he was ok to proceed tonight in his absence. State & Idyllwild — have to work with caltrans — light is warranted from study. Gave options staff recommends alternative access option b — install raised median prohibits left turn in one direction only. Chris ? speed issues. Habib adopt recommendations from traffic eng. Habib other option is raised median in middle of intersection. Conner questioned the neighborhood to get to DeAnza Elem. Suggest add'I lane before light. Habib implement some things to stop accidents. Habib recommends option b and depends on process req with Caltrans. Habib there are enough accidents to warrant E& W and No & So Conner intersection state and Idly adopt B and see if could put rt turn into Idyllwild. Towards school east off of state street. Habib not a problem amend budget by approx $20,000 can bring back closer estimate if money needed potentially can do something like Eagle and expressway Chris 2"d passes 4/0 / Habib Stubblefield request traffic calming - Sheriff & Main — would become 4 way stop, Mistletoe and Main, Hewitt & Main — both sides of park. Habib suggested further narrow striping to slow traffic. Conner thinks more imp at Alexander vs Sheriff. Eng can evaluate if cc desires. Chris - ? will cc review — would like to see after lotto line. What all the total improvements. Mayor suggested may be doing turnouts for RDA buses. Cheaper upfront than after redone. Habib noted new development will be conditioned to repay City. Not adding to main just redoing. Chris moved recommendation plus direction to staff signage and striping Conner 2nd passes 4/o Chase St — has become speeding area. To install chase & sagecrest. And chase and ; speed limit 25mph Chris - ? rule for collector not considered residential because doesn't have driveways. Habib Ping Comm are requesting traffic reports and address these issues before they become problem. Chris - when do we have an adopted standard — Habib doesn't know will have to ask traffic eng. He will be available to cc in next 60 days to report on speeding report city wide. She suggested it be incl in mtg with school district. Conner - because sagecrest and chase are the main exits out of subd. They need to move it out quickly. Ayres — commented that there is too much speeding in residential areas as cc mtgs; at neighborhood mtgs same no. one issue. Idea was to slow traffic down. Conner questioned how there could be warrants that could require based on numbers of homes in area. Chris — Chase doesn't have speed limit. Housing tract doesn't have 3 exits like they are required now. Expects situation is going to get worse when school is opened. Mayor noted vouched what he deals with turning into his area. Officer Ritchie, - personal opinion with professional background. St has to be narrower than 40'; or 14 hse in 1/4 mile; Chase doesn't meet criteria. Technically speed limit is 55mph. Agreed with stop sign at chase and cypress. As a citizen needs to stop momentum. Advised cc to consider liability issues in school area. Chris - ? what school will prepare. Habib ideally works with city and traffic eng. Habib hasn't been consulted in the past 6 yrs by school. John Hunt — on Commonwealth — 3 way stop at Park Hill School. Most parents don't stop picking up or dropping off. 60% residents don't stop either. Inc! Hemet officer. Putting up sign doesn't mean it will be obeyed. Bob Otta — Main St across from market response — main st will be getting and should address issues better Eng recommends 'd' - questioned Monterey — will bring back; safe access plan from school. Habib will bring back. Disc at joint mtg if necessary. Chris moved Conner 2"d passes 4/0 4.4 Weed Abatement noted mulch comes from our tree trimmers; utilizing public service worksers. Ayres questioned if had to be sprayed first. Bob 6 in thick and doesn't require to be spread. Shaw - ? Bob responded like to use herbaside in certain conditions but prefer woodchips helps retain soil if dry and windy. Conner — ? Bob not in waterflow areas, not next to street; mower dedicated 8-9 mos yrly. Reviewed where work is being done. Ayres — spray program is reported to CC. Bob already started spraying. Bob recomm is free mulch and public service workers because of budget impact. Conner noted don't want waste to drop so that the city get fined. CM noted to discuss with CR&R city should get credit. Ayres moved Shaw 2"d passes 4/0. Consent Calendar 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 Chris pulled 5.5 Conner pulled 5.6 Conner pulled 5.7 5.8 Chris moved shaw 2"d passed 4/0 5.4 — doesn't see this as routine item. Move approval but not on consent in future passes 4/0 5.5 new subd along Sanderson between 7th & Esplanade. ? signalization conditioned Habib Conner Ayress passes 4/0 5.6 waterline project need on west side. Conner 12" Doesn't talk about size of pipe, questioned parrallell pipe. Does incl potter road to ; based on master plan today — sized for that. Conner concerned about no. of homes planned and 12" won't fit. Habib will look at master plan Conner moved Chris 2"d passed 4/0 To RDA 8:48 Chris moved approve minutes Ayres 2nd passes 4/0 adj 8:59 CC Reports 6.1 Painting City Hall Shaw suggest to cm a couple of mos ago looks, paint chipped, casements of windows fading, cracks, loose tiles, initially thought RDA $ available that is not the case. Would like support — to be proud of City Hall after spending $600,000 on main st Conner front walk fixed — not go to bid — taped off dangerous. Cosentini safety issue started today to get fixed. Chris - ? different pots - brick & motar approx $600,000 in fund. Conner — sale of hard assets and supposed to be used to purchase hard assets. Direct staff to get $4,000. CM appropriation. Chris moved to direct bring back options to get this work done Conner 2"d passes 4/0 Ayres soon as possible CM next mtg. Recess 9:04 pm PETITION TO RETAIN SAN JACINTO POLICE DEPARTMENT We, the undersigned business owners, employees thereof, and/or residents of San Jacinto, California, do certify and declare our desire to retain the San Jacinto Police Department, a municipal agency, and the city of San Jacinto's only law enforcement provider. We expressly reject its replacement with contract services by the Riverside County Sheriffs Department, aka: RSO, or any other contracting law enforcement agency. 4. ,..(4- NAME 1. 2. 3. `14 5. c� I 1`• ADDRESS TELEPHONE 2.60L 10. 1 2.1/ 9 (a 13. 14 15. 16. 17. 18. 19 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: 2 SUBJECT: DATE: _ 05 IN FAVOR: 0 NEUTRAL: R IN OPPOSITION: 0 _rM l:/1/ Name: E"Y/ RepresentinglI✓ :, /�,.�^�/ l /S�j' r7 Address: 7d% . Ala / f/ City: Telephone No.: Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: Z • 0 SUBJECT: I Yk DATE: :L;/ % IN FAVOR: ❑ Name: 7 k r`r-r AO' NEUTRAL: 0 IN OPPOSITION: 0 Representing: ; 0,.e �ae/mo o Address:_//4d7 / P City: Telephone No.: Cf11� /d9 Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: "'/ SUBJECT:C-r'f ' rete1ec-': e%e""(140cerze//I(_. DATE: c /5 /c'`� IN FAVOR: ❑,, f( NEUTRAL: 0 IN OPPOSITION: Name:_ �r �R ( flew, Lih Representing: Address: J/) /2e't/ City: 5/ii/Y V/Iz'r/L/�1,7 Telephone No.: Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: , , DATE: 6'4 IN FAVOR: ❑ NEUTRAL: 0 IN OPPOSITION: ❑ Name: !Fb_n i /2 T . 0 ± Ar Representing. S Address: to �5 — E "' 5/e2 Q 7s a Telephone No.: 62 s1 '(57� City: REQUEST TO SPEAK SUBJECT: Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: SUBJECT: DATE: ,� f IN FAVOR: 0 NEUTRAL: 0 IN OPPOSITION: 0 Name Representing:-L. Address: City: Telephone No.: �% Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: DATE: -g0512 REQUEST TO SPEAK SUBJECT: A1071 rij4iW, vl?, n.-4— IN FAVOR: ❑ NEUTRAL: ,d' IN OPPOSITION: 0 Name: H N ^Q Representing: Address: _ i r`�e ki i City: Q N Qeo.ty1D Telephone No.: (q-C112_ Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. �-T REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: 2 �C7 SUBJECT: `y G2A4)2 // DATE: ` O -D IN F,A(QR ❑ NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: i Name: ��iLq:�r.fJ1�1X ,I V�tc4 L Representing: Address: (0-7k 1/ Cert4,1 City: --te;t" Q1 ci254u Telephone No.: -1 ? c)—0 i 6 d Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: DATE: —IN IN 0 Name: V (7,1 � Representing: /76j ft(//n 1 -4 Qk CIP Address: /// aa7 City:Gft� I �`f.✓ REQUEST TO SPEAK Z ,0 SUBJECT:7Ry__ P po'ri IN OPPOSITION: 1) NEUTRAL: 0 Telephone No.: 63 7 7 fi Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time. Please make your presentation from the microphone. HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. AGENDA REGULAR MEETING SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FEBRUARY 5, 2004 Immediately Following the Regular City Council Meeting San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS None 3. PUBLIC HEARING: Now is the time for the public to address the Agency on any subject not listed on the agenda. Any person may address the Agency on any subject pertaining to Redevelopment Agency business not listed on the Agenda during this portion of the Meeting. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the Agency Directors. 4. CITY DEPARTMENTS None 5. CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by Agency Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the Redevelopment Agency, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Agency Chairman; state their name, address and the consent calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. 5.1 January 22, 2004 Regular Meeting Minutes / Approve / Agency Secretary Redevelopment Agency Agenda February 5, 2004 Page 2 of 2 6. CHAIRPERSON / MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS None 7. OPEN SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS CLOSED SESSION None 8. ADJOURNMENT 1, Do,tot4 Leffoubuvr.d. Sec/teem/o e Saw Paebteo A'edeoelotiffteat >49ege4, do 4w-4 ce.,tgey titat 1 awed to th44 ted Ole-90449 alegda tite 30a da# Pwaaiui, 2004, 44 lefaoled 4 ea,. - 6 ,1 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY JANAURY 22, 2004, 9:13 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order Chairman Jim Ayres called the Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency to order at 9:13 p.m. 1.2 Roll Call Present: Jim Ayres, Chris Carlson-Buydos, Ken Shaw, Dale Stubblefield Absent: Jim Conner 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS None 3. PUBLIC HEARING: None 4. CITY DEPARTMENTS In accordance with Director unanimous consensus this item was added to the 1/22/04 RDA Agenda. 4.1 Façade Enhancement Loan Program for the Downtown Zone / Approve / Community Development Director M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve the Façade Enhancement Loan Program with an outreach program and or a surgical mailing. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Carlson-Buydos, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres Redevelopment Agency Minutes January 22, 2004 Page 2 of 2 Nays: Absent: Abstain: None Conner None 5. CONSENT CALENDAR 5.1 January 8, 2004 Regular Meeting Minutes / Approve / Agency Secretary M/S/C (Carlson-Buydos / Stubblefield) moved to approve the Agenda Item 5.1 as submitted. Motion carried 4/0. Ayes: Nays: Absent: Abstain: Carlson-Buydos, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres None Conner None 6. CHAIRPERSON / MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS None 7. OPEN SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS CLOSED SESSION None 8. ADJOURNMENT With no further business coming before the Agency, Chairman Ayres adjourned the meeting at 9:16 p.m. San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency by Jim Ayres, Chairman ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, Agency Secretary