HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 2/5/2004AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 5, 2004, 7:00 p.m.
San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room
2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California
ORGANIZATION
1.1 Call to Order
1.2 Roll Call
1.3 Invocation — Rev. Bob Sauter, Faith Tabernacle, San Jacinto
1.4 Pledge of Allegiance
1.5 Special Presentations
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Now is the time for the public to address the Council on any subject within the jurisdiction of the
City Council not listed on the agenda. A recap of the nonagendized comments will be addressed
under item number 2.1 during the City's second regular meeting of the month.
3. PUBLIC HEARING
3.1 Resolution No. _ / A Resolution making certain determinations and
authorizing the submittal of the levy of special taxes to the qualified
electors of certain territory proposed to be annexed into Community
Facilities District 2003-1 (CFD 2003-1 Annexation No. 2) / Approve and
Adopt / City Attorney & City Consultant
4. CITY DEPARTMENTS
4.1 Traffic Calming Standards; Traffic Calming Improvements — placement
and installation of speed humps along Warwick Street, Roanoke Street,
Serena Court, and Savory Lane / Approve / City Engineer
4.2 Fire Stations / Fire Department's recommended site plan for future fire
stations / Approve / Battalion Fire Chief
City Council Agenda
February 5, 2003
Pape 2 of 3
4.3 Traffic Reports for the intersections of State Street and Idyilwild Drive,
Main Street between Sheriff Avenue and Ramona Expressway, and
Chase Street at Cypress and Sagecrest Drive / Approve and Authorize
implementation of recommendations / City Engineer
4.4 Weed Abatement on undeveloped parkway areas / Approve / Public
Works
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one
motion by City Council Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these
items prior to the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests a
specified item be removed and/or discussed.
Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the
Mayor; state their name, address and the consent calendar item number. Speakers should Emit
comments to three (3) minutes.
5.1 Warrant Register for Warrants, Prepaid Checks, and Payroll Checks
Period Ending 02/05/04 / Approve / Finance Director
5.2 January 22, 2004 Regular Meeting Minutes / Approve / City Clerk
5.3 Treasurer's Report December 31, 2003 / Approve / Finance Director
5.4 Lake Park Drive Well and Main Street Waterline (Project No. 02-022) !
Authorize bid advertisement for construction / City Engineer
5.5 Final Tract Maps 30462 and 30462-1 / Greystone Homes Inc / Approve
and Authorize City Manager to execute subdivision agreements / City
Engineer
5.6 Ramona Boulevard / Sanderson Avenue Waterline — Project No. 02-008 /
Approve public works contract to Utah Pacific Construction Company for
$385,450 and reject all other bids / City Engineer
5.7 Resolution No. _ / A Resolution of Initiation Ordering the District
Engineer to prepare and to file a report related to maintenance of public
improvements in Lighting, Landscaping Park District No. 1 (LLPD No. 1)
for Fiscal Year 2004-2005 Property Tax Roll / Approve and Adopt /
Finance Director
5.8 Resolution No. / A Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the levy and
collection of Lighting, Landscaping Park District No. 2 (LLPD No. 2)
Annual Assessments for FY 2004-05 and ordering District Engineer to
prepare and file report related to maintenance of public improvements in
LLPD No. 2 for Fiscal Year 2004-2005 Property Tax Roll / Approve and
Adopt / Finance Director
City Council Agenda
February 5, 2003
Page 3 of 3
6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS
6.1 Painting City Hall / Direct staff / Council Member Shaw
7. CLOSED SESSION
7.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford
Employee Organization: Police Officers Association
7.2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford
Employee Organization: Sergeants Association
7.3 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION
Subdivision (a) of Section 94956.9
Name of Case: Tony's Sea Landing v. City of San Jacinto, Us Bankruptcy Ct
Case No. RS 01-17735 DN
7.4 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION
Subdivision (a) of Section 94956.9
Name of Case: City of San Jacinto vs. Camilo Primero, M.D., Inc.
Riverside County Superior Court Case No. 404638
7.5 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL —ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of Section
54956.5: Two (2) or more cases
8. ADJOURNMENT
CHALLENGE TO LAND USE DECISIONS: Any person seeking to challenge a decision regarding land
use made by the City Council as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be
given, evidence is required to be taken, and the discretion in the determination of facts is vested in the
City Council, shall be required to commence that action 90 days following the date on which the decision
of the City Council becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Please refer to
Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 to determine how to calculate when a decision becomes final.
It is the intention of the City of San Jacinto to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all
respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will
need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in
every reasonable manner. Please contact City Hall at (909) 487-7330, at least 48 hours prior to the
meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible.
1. v0144 4. eltathrafue, e d e i (6 Sao paciota, k y cettch rl t 9 cued a 6e AOated tl:e
pupae, afeocla tiria 30t4 dav a6 may. 2004 a 4 eau,
AGENDA ITEM 3'
February 5, 2004
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Special Tax Consultant , City Attorney and Finance Special DistrictsQ
SUBJECT: Annexation #2 of Territory into Community Facilities District No. 2003-01
for Police and Fire Services
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution of intention to annex territory into Community
Facilities District No. 2003-01.
BACKGROUND: The City Council and Planning Commission have recently identified the
need for additional funding sources for police protection and fire protection and
suppression services, especially those services that are created by new development
within the City. In response to the need for additional funding for such services, the City
Council formed Community Facilities District 2003-1 (the "District') and the levy of special
taxes therein. On November 6, 2003, the City Council called an election of the landowners
affected by the formation of the District and the levy of special taxes. The landowners
approved the formation of the District and levy of special taxes with over a two-thirds
majority vote of the voters voting.
Willow Creek LLP is developing certain real property (APN 439-110-002) that will be
developed into a multi -family housing project near the boundaries of the District. As a
condition to receiving the building permits from the City, Willow Creek LLP must annex its
territory into the District. Willow Creek LLP now desires to obtain building permits and
annex such real property into the District.
JUSTIFICATION: The adoption of the resolution is required to begin the annexation
process into the District.
BUDGETARY IMPACT: The annexation of the Willow Creek LLP property into the District
will have a beneficial impact to the City's budget in that, upon implementation of the
proposed financing district, it would assist in the funding of police and fire services that
would otherwise come from the City's general fund.
1
City Manager:
Finance Director:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE SAN JACINTO
CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND
AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES
TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF CERTAIN TERRITORY
PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 2003-1
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA (the "City Council"), has previously declared its intention and held
and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory (the
"Annexation Area") to an existing community facilities district and an
improvement area thereto pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -
Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2,
Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article
3.5 thereof (the "Act") and the City of San Jacinto Ordinance Conditioning the
Issuance of Building Permits on Annexation into Police, Fire and Road
Maintenance Financing Districts enacted pursuant to the powers reserved by the
City of San Jacinto under Sections 7 of Article XI of the Constitution of the State
of California (the "Ordinance") (the Act and the Ordinance may be referred to
collectively as the "Community Facilities District Law"). The existing Community
Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 2003-1 (the "District"); and,
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing relating to the annexation of such
territory to the District, the extent of such territory, the financing of Authorized
Services (as defined in Section 4 below) and all other related matters has been
given; and,
WHEREAS, it has now been determined that written protests have not
been received by fifty percent (50%) or more of the registered voters residing
either within the Annexation Area or the District and/or property owners
representing more than one-half (1/2) or more of the area of land within the
Annexed Area or within the District; and,
WHEREAS, inasmuch as there have been less than twelve (12) persons
registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the ninety (90)
preceding days, this legislative body desires to submit the levy of the required
special tax to the landowners of the Annexation Area, said landowners being the
qualified electors as authorized by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. RECITALS The above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. DETERMINATIONS It is determined by this City Council
that:
A. all proceedings to consider the annexation of the Annexation Area to the
District prior hereto were valid and taken in conformity with the
requirements of law, and specifically the provisions of the Community
Facilities District Law;
B. the annexation of the Annexation Area to the District as proposed
conforms with the policies of City of San Jacinto;
C. less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the Annexation
Area for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the close of the public
hearing and, consequently, the qualified electors shall be the landowners
of the Annexation Area and each landowner who is the owner of record as
of the close of the public hearing, or the authorized representative thereof,
shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land that she or
he owns within the Annexation Area;
D. the time limit specified by the Community Facilities District Law for
conducting an election to submit the levy of the special taxes to the
qualified electors of the Annexation Area and the requirements for
impartial analysis and ballot arguments have been waived with the
unanimous consent of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area;
E. the City Clerk, acting as the election official, has consented to conducting
any required election on a date which is less than one hundred twenty-five
(125) days following the adoption of any resolution annexing the
Annexation Area to the District; and
F. the Authorized Services proposed to be financed from the proceeds of
special taxes to be levied within the Annexation Area are in addition to
maintenance provided to the Annexation Area before the annexation
thereof to the District.
SECTION 3. BOUNDARIES OF ANNEXED AREA. The boundaries and
parcels of land in the Annexation Area and on which special taxes are proposed
to be levied in order to pay the costs and expenses of the Authorized Services
are generally described as follows:
All that property and territory proposed to be annexed to the
District, as said property is shown on a map as previously approved
by this legislative body, said map designated as Annexation Map
No. 2 of Community Facilities District No. 2003-1, a copy of which
is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and shall remain open for
public inspection.
SECTION 4. DESCRIPTION OF AUTHORIZED SERVICES. The services
that are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special
taxes levied within the District (the "Authorized Services") are generally described
as (a) additional police protection services, including but not limited to, criminal
justice services and (b) additional fire protection and suppression services
throughout the District.
The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual
costs and expenses necessary to provide the Authorized Services.
The Authorized Services authorized to be financed by the District from the
proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are also the Authorized
Services to be provided in the Annexation Area. If and to the extent possible the
Authorized Services shall be provided in common within the District and the
Annexation Area.
SECTION 5. SPECIAL TAXES. Except where funds are otherwise
available a special tax, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all
non-exempt real property in the Annexation Area, is hereby authorized, subject to
voter approval, to be levied within the boundaries of the Annexation Area. For
particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax
proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area, reference is made to the
attached and incorporated Exhibit A (the "Rate and Method of Apportionment"),
which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment of the special tax
to allow each landowner or resident within the Annexation Area to estimate the
maximum amount that such person will have to pay. Such special tax shall be
utilized to fund the Special Tax Requirement as such term is defined in the Rate
and Method of Apportionment.
The special taxes herein authorized, to the extent possible, shall be
collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject
to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of
delinquency as applicable for ad valorem taxes; provided, however, the District
may utilize a direct billing procedure for any special taxes that cannot be
collected on the County tax roll or may, by resolution, elect to collect the special
taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial
obligations.
Under no circumstances will the special tax to be levied against any parcel
within the Annexation Area used for private residential purposes be increased as
a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other parcel or
parcels within the District by more than ten percent (10%).
Upon recordation of a Notice of Special Tax Lien pursuant to Section
3114.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California against the
property within the Annexation Area, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the
special tax shall attach to all non-exempt real property in the Annexation Area
and this lien shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is
prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien canceled in accordance with law
or until collection of the tax by the legislative body ceases.
SECTION 6. SPECIAL TAX ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES. Pursuant to
and in compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50075.1, this
City Council hereby establishes the following accountability measures pertaining
to the levy by the District of the special taxes within the Annexation Area as
described in Section 5 above:
A. Each such special tax shall be levied for the specific purposes set forth in
Section 5 above.
B. The proceeds of the levy of each such special tax shall be applied only to
the specific applicable purposes set forth in Section 5 above.
C. The District shall establish a separate account into which the proceeds of
the special taxes levied within the District shall be deposited.
D. The City Manager or his or her designee, acting for and on behalf of the
District, shall annually file a report with the City Council as required
pursuant to Government Code Section 50075.3.
SECTION 7. ELECTION. The proposition related to the levy of the special
tax shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, said
electors being the landowners, with each landowner having one (1) vote for each
acre or portion thereof of land which he or she owns within the Annexation Area.
The election shall be held on March 4, 2004, and such election shall be a special
election to be conducted by the City Clerk (hereinafter "Election Official"). If the
proposition for the levy of the special tax receives the approval of more than two-
thirds (2/3) of the votes cast on the proposition, the special tax may be levied as
provided for in this Resolution.
SECTION 8. BALLOT The ballot proposal to be submitted to the qualified
voters at the election shall generally be as follows:
PROPOSITION A
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1
ANNEXATION MAP NO. 2
AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL TAX LEVY
Shall Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 of the City of San
Jacinto be authorized to levy special taxes, subject to the
accountability measures set forth in Resolution No.
within the territory identified in Annexation Map No. 2 to such
district therein pursuant to the rate and method of apportionment of
special taxes (the "Rate and Method") set forth in such resolution
for the purpose of funding the Special Tax Requirement as such
term is defined in the Rate and Method?
SECTION 9. VOTE The appropriate mark placed in the line before the
word "YES" shall be counted in favor of the adoption of the proposition, and the
appropriate mark placed in the line before the word "NO" in the manner as
authorized, shall be counted against the adoption of said proposition.
SECTION 10. ELECTION PROCEDURE This City Council hereby
authorizes the Election Official to take any and all steps necessary for the holding
of said election and ratifies any such steps previously taken by such Election
Official which were necessary for the holding of such election. Said Election
Official shall perform and render all services and proceedings incidental to and
connected with the conduct of said election, and said services shall include, but
not be limited to the following:
A. Prepare and furnish to the election officers necessary election
supplies for the conduct of the election.
B. Cause to be printed the requisite
sheets and other necessary forms.
C. Furnish and address official ballots
Annexation Area.
number of official ballots, tally
for the qualified electors of the
D. Cause the official ballots to be mailed and/or delivered, as required
by law.
E. Receive the returns of the election.
F. Sort and assemble the election material and supplies in preparation
for the canvassing of the returns.
G. Canvass the returns of the election.
H. Furnish a tabulation of the number of votes given in the election.
I. Make all arrangements and take the necessary steps to pay all
costs of the election incurred as a result of services performed by
the District and pay costs and expenses of all election officials.
J. Conduct and handle all other matters relating to the proceedings
and conduct of the election in the manner and form as required by
law.
PREPARED BY:
Jeffrey S. Ballinger
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
City Attorney
EXHIBIT "A"
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
OF SPECIAL TAXES
[Attach revised rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for
Community Facilities District 2003-1]
SHEET 1 OF 1
ANNEXATION MAP NO. 2 TO
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Reference is hereby made to that certain map entitled "Amended Boundaries
of City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2003-1, County of
Riverside, State of California," filed the 22nd day of December, 2003, at the
hour of 8 o'clock a.m. in Book 55 at pages 58-59, and as instrument number
2003-995886 in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside,
State of California, which this Annexation Map affects.
LEGEND
Boundaries of Annexation No. 2 to
City of San Jacinto Community
Facilities District No. 2003-1
439-110-002 Assessor Parcel Number
Esplanade
0
0
c
o
Prepared by David Taussig & Associates, Inc.
Assessor Parcel Number within
Annexation No. 2 to Community
Facilities District No. 2003-1:
439-110-002
Ave
Exempt recording requested per
CA Government Code § 6103
La
Entrada
Reference is hereby made to
the Assessor maps of the
County of Riverside for an
exact description of the
lines and dimensions of
each lot and parcel.
Commonwealth Ave
(1) Filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of San
Jacinto this day of , 2004.
Dorothy Chouinard, San Jacinto City Clerk
(2) I hereby certify that the within map showing the proposed
boundaries of Annexation No. 2 to City of San Jacinto
Community Facilities District No. 2003-1, Riverside County,
State of California, was approved by the City Council at a
regular meeting thereof, held on this day of
, 2004, by its Resolution No.
Dorothy Chouinard, San Jacinto City Clerk
(3) Filed this day of , 2004, at the
hour of o'clock _m, in Book of
Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities
Districts at page and as Instrument No.
in the office of the County
Recorder of Riverside County, State of California.
Fee
County Recorder of Riverside County
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
COMMUNITY FACILITES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
A-1
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1
OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
A Special Tax as hereinafter defined shall be levied on all Assessor's Parcels in Community
Facilities District No. 2003-1 of the City of San Jacinto ("CFD No. 2003-1") and collected each
Fiscal Year commencing in Fiscal Year 2003-2004, in an amount determined by the Council through
the application of the appropriate Special Tax for "Developed Property" as described below. All of
the real property in CFD No. 2003-1, unless exempted by law or by the provisions hereof, shall be
taxed for the purposes, to the extent and in the manner herein provided.
A. DEFINITIONS
The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings:
"Acre or Acreage" means the land area of an Assessor's Parcel as shown on an Assessor's
Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map, the land area
shown on the applicable final map, parcel map, condominium plan, or other recorded County
parcel map.
"Act" means the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter
2.5, Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California.
"Administrative Expenses" means the following actual or reasonably estimated costs
directly related to the administration of CFD No. 2003-1: the costs of computing the Special
Taxes and preparing the annual Special Tax collection schedules (whether by the City or
designee thereof or both); the costs of collecting the Special Taxes (whether by the County
or otherwise); the costs to the City, CFD No. 2003-1 or any designee thereof of complying
with City or CFD No. 2003-1 disclosure requirements; the costs associated with responding
to public inquiries regarding the Special Taxes; the costs of the City, CFD No. 2003-1 or any
designee thereof related to an appeal of the Special Tax; and the City's annual administration
fees and third party expenses. Administrative Expenses shall also include amounts estimated
or advanced by the City or CFD No. 2003-1 for any other administrative purposes of CFD
No. 2003-1, including attorney's fees and other costs related to commencing and pursuing to
completion any foreclosure of delinquent Special Taxes.
"Apartment Property" means any Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property that consists of
a building or buildings comprised of attached residential units available for rental, but not
purchase, by the general public and under common management.
"Assessor's Parcel Map" means an official map of the Assessor of the County designating
parcels by Assessor's Parcel number.
City of San Jacinto
Community Facilities District No. 2003-1
October 30, 2003
Page 1
"CFD Administrator" means an official of the City, or designee thereof, responsible for
calculating the Special Tax Requirement and providing for the levy and collection of the
Special Taxes.
"CFD No. 2003-1" means Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 of the City.
"City" means the City of San Jacinto.
"Consumer Price Index" means the Consumer Price Index published by the U.S. Bureau of
Labor Statistics for "All Urban Consumers" in the Los Angeles - Anaheim - Riverside Area,
measured as of the month of December in the calendar year which ends in the previous
Fiscal Year. In the event this index ceases to be published, the Consumer Price Index shall
be another index as determined by the CFD Administrator that is reasonably comparable to
the Consumer Price Index for the City of Los Angeles.
"Council" means the City Council of the City, acting as the legislative body of CFD No.
2003-1.
"County" means the County of Riverside.
"Developed Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property for which a
building permit for new construction was issued after March 1, 2003 and as of March 1 of
the previous Fiscal Year.
"Fiscal Year" means the period starting July 1 and ending on the following June 30.
"Floor Area" for any Non -Residential Property means the total square footage of the
building(s) located on such property, measured from outside wall to outside wall, exclusive
of overhangs, porches, patios, carports, or similar spaces attached to the building but
generally open on at least two sides. The determination of Floor Area shall be made by
reference to the building permit(s) issued for such Assessor's Parcel.
"Land Use Class" means any of the classes listed in Table 1 and Table 2.
"Maximum Special Tax" means the Maximum Special Tax A and/or Maximum Special
Tax B, as applicable.
"Maximum Special Tax A" means the Maximum Special Tax A, determined in accordance
with Section C.1 below, that can be levied in any Fiscal Year on any Assessor's Parcel.
"Maximum Special Tax B" means the Maximum Special Tax B, determined in accordance
with Section C.2 below, that can be levied on any Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property on a
one-time basis, at the time a building permit for new construction is issued for such
Assessor's Parcel.
"Non -Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels for which a building permit(s)
was issued for a non-residential use.
City of San Jacinto
Community Facilities District No. 2003-1
October 30, 2003
Page 2
"Non -Retail Commercial/Industrial Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of
Developed Property that are considered Non -Residential Property and that are not Retail
Commercial Property.
"Property Owner Association Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, any Assessor's
Parcel within the boundaries of CFD No. 2003-1 that was owned by or irrevocably offered
for dedication to a property owner association, including any master or sub -association, as of
January 1 of the previous Fiscal Year.
"Proportionately" means that the ratio of the actual Special Tax A levy to the Maximum
Special Tax A is equal for all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property.
"Public Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, (i) any property within the boundaries of
CFD No. 2003-1 that was owned by or irrevocably offered for dedication to the federal
government, the State, the City or any other public agency as of January 1 of the previous
Fiscal Year; provided however that any property leased by a public agency to a private entity
and subject to taxation under Section 53340.1 of the Act shall be taxed and classified in
accordance with its use; or (ii) any property within the boundaries of CFD No. 2003-1 that
was encumbered, as of January 1 of the previous Fiscal Year, by an unmanned utility
easement making impractical its utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the
easement.
"Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property for which a
building permit has been issued for purposes of constructing one or more residential
dwelling units.
"Retail Commercial Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Non -Residential Property
for which the building permit was issued for a retail sales tax generating use or which is
being used primarily for a retail sales tax generating use, as determined by the CFD
Administrator. However, if the land use of an Assessor's Parcel changes, and such
Assessor's Parcel no longer generates retail sales tax, such Assessor's Parcel shall no longer
be considered Retail Commercial Property and shall be classified and taxed according to its
use, as determined by the CFD Administrator.
"Single Family Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Residential Property for which
building permits have been issued for detached residential units, excluding Apartment
Property.
"Special Tax" means the Special Tax A and/or Special Tax B, as applicable.
"Special Tax A" means the annual special tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on each
Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property to fund the Special Tax Requirement.
"Special Tax B" means the one-time Special Tax which is paid directly to the City at the
time a building permit for new construction is issued for an Assessor's Parcel of Taxable
Property.
City of San Jacinto
Community Facilities District No. 2003-1
October 30, 2003
Page 3
"Special Tax Requirement" means that amount required in any Fiscal Year to meet the
needs of CFD No. 2003-1 to: (i) pay for fire protection and suppression services (ii) pay for
police protection services (iii) pay Administrative Expenses; less (iv) a credit for any funds
available to reduce the annual Special Tax levy, as determined by the CFD Administrator.
"State" means the State of California.
"Taxable Property" means all of the Assessor's Parcels within the boundaries of CFD No.
2003-1 which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below.
"Undeveloped Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property not classified
as Developed Property.
B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CATEGORIES
Each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property within CFD No. 2003-1 shall be classified as
Developed Property or Undeveloped Property and shall be subject to Special Taxes in
accordance with the rate and method of apportionment determined pursuant to Section C.
Residential Property shall be assigned to Land Use Classes 1 and 2 based on the type of
structure located on the Assessor's Parcel. Non -Retail Commercial/Industrial Property shall
be assigned to Land Use Class 3.
C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE
1. Special Tax A
The Special Tax A is an annual Special Tax that shall be levied on Developed
Property to fund the Special Tax Requirement.
a. Developed Property
(i)
Maximum Special Tax A
The Maximum Special Tax A for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 for each
Land Use Class is shown below in Table 1.
City of San Jacinto October 30, 2003
Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 Page 4
TABLE 1
Maximum Special Tax A for Developed Property
For Fiscal Year 2003-2004
Community Facilities District No. 2003-1
Land Use Class
Description
Maximum Special Tax A
1
Single Family Property
$350 per unit
2
Apartment Property
$262.50 per unit
3
Non -Retail
Commercial/Industrial Property
$0.1 19 per SF of Floor Area
(ii) Increase in the Maximum Special Tax A
On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2004, the Maximum Special
Tax A shall be increased based on the percentage change in the
Consumer Price Index with a maximum annual increase of six
percent (6%) and a minimum annual increase of two percent (2%) per
Fiscal Year.
(iii) Multiple Land Use Classes
In some instances an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property may
contain more than one Land Use Class. The Maximum Special Tax
that can be levied on an Assessor's Parcel shall be the sum of the
Maximum Special Taxes that can be levied for all Land Use Classes
located on that Assessor's Parcel.
b. Undeveloped Property
No Special Tax A shall be levied on Undeveloped Property.
City of San Jacinto
Community Facilities District No. 2003-1
October 30, 2003
Page 5
2. Special Tax B
The Special Tax B is a one-time Special Tax that shall be paid directly to the City at
the time a building permit for new construction is issued for an Assessor's Parcel of
Taxable Property.
a. Maximum Special Tax B
The Maximum Special Tax B for Fiscal Year 2003-2004 for each Land Use
Class is shown below in Table 2.
TABLE 2
Maximum Special Tax B
For Fiscal Year 2003-2004
Community Facilities District No. 2003-1
Land Use Class
Description
Maximum Special Tax B
1
Single Family Property
$600 per unit
2
Apartment Property
$450 per unit
3
Non -Retail
Commercial/Industrial
Property
$0.204 per SF of Floor Area
b. Increase in the Maximum Special Tax B
On each July 1, commencing on July 1, 2004, the Maximum Special Tax B
shall be increased based on the percentage change in the Consumer Price
Index with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6%) and a minimum
annual increase of two percent (2%) per Fiscal Year.
D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX
1. Special Tax A
Commencing with Fiscal Year 2003-2004 and for each following Fiscal Year, the
Council shall determine the Special Tax Requirement. The Council shall levy the
Special Tax A until the amount of Special Taxes equals the Special Tax
Requirement.
The Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of
Developed Property at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax A as
needed to satisfy the Special Tax Requirement.
City of San Jacinto
Community Facilities District No. 2003-1
October 30, 2003
Page 6
Notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax A levied
against any Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property for which an occupancy permit
for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten percent as a
consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Parcel
within CFD No. 2003-1.
2. Special Tax B
Commencing with Fiscal Year 2003-04 and for each following Fiscal Year, the
Council shall levy the Special Tax B on each Assessor's Parcel that is subject to the
Special Tax B at 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax B. The Special Tax
B shall be collected by the City at the time a building permit for new construction is
issued for an Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property.
E. EXEMPTIONS
No Special Tax shall be levied on Retail Commercial Property, Property Owner Association
Property or Public Property. However, should an Assessor's Parcel no longer be classified
as Retail Commercial Property, Property Owner Association Property or Public Property, its
tax-exempt status will be revoked.
F. APPEALS AND INTERPRETATIONS
Any landowner or resident may file a written appeal of the Special Tax on his/her property
with the CFD Administrator, provided that the appellant is current in his/her payments of
Special Taxes. During the pendency of an appeal, all Special Taxes previously levied must
be paid on or before the payment date established when the levy was made. The appeal must
specify the reasons why the appellant claims the Special Tax is in error. The CFD
Administrator shall review the appeal, meet with the appellant if the CFD Administrator
deems necessary, and advise the appellant of its determination. If the CFD Administrator
agrees with the appellant, the CFD Administrator shall eliminate or reduce the Special Tax
on the appellant's property and/or provide a refund to the appellant. If the CFD
Administrator disagrees with the appellant and the appellant is dissatisfied with the
determination, the appellant then has 30 days in which to appeal to the Council by filing a
written notice of appeal with the City Clerk, provided that the appellant is current in his/her
payments of Special Taxes. The second appeal must specify the reasons for its disagreement
with the CFD Administrator's determination.
Interpretations may be made by the Council by ordinance or resolution for purposes of
clarifying any vagueness or ambiguity in this Rate and Method of Apportionment.
City of San Jacinto October 30, 2003
Community Facilities District No. 2003-1 Page 7
G. MANNER OF COLLECTION
The Special Tax A shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad
valorem property taxes; provided, however, that in Fiscal Year 2004-05 and each Fiscal Year
thereafter, CFD No. 2003-1 may directly bill the Special Tax A, may collect Special Taxes at
a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations, and
may covenant to foreclose and may actually foreclose on delinquent Assessor's Parcels as
permitted by the Act. Commencing in Fiscal Year 2003-04, the Special Tax B shall be paid
directly to the City.
H. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX
The Special Tax A and Special Tax B shall be levied as long as necessary to fund items (i)
and (ii) of the Special Tax Requirement.
K:\Clients2\San Jacinto\Mello\Police&Fire CFD\RMA\servicesrma9.doc
City of San Jacinto
Community Facilities District No. 2003-1
October 30, 2003
Page 8
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF JACINTO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX A FOR
DEVELOPED PROPERTY
Land Use
Class
Description
Fiscal Year 2003-04
Maximum Special Tax A [1]
1
Single Family Property
$350.00 per unit
2
Apartment Property
$262.50 per unit
3
Non -Retail Commercial/Industrial
Property
$0.119 per SF of Floor Area
[1] On each July 1, commencing July 1, 2004, the Maximum Special Tax A for Developed Property
shall be increased by the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index with a maximum annual
increase of six percent (6.00%) and a minimum increase of two percent (2.00%) of the amount in
effect in the previous Fiscal Year.
EXHIBIT C
CITY OF JACINTO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX B
Land Use
Class
Description
Fiscal Year 2003-04
Maximum Special Tax B [1]
1
Single Family Property
$600.00 per unit
2
Apartment Property
$450.00 per unit
3
Non -Retail Commercial/Industrial
Property
$0.204 per SF of Floor Area
[1] On each July 1, commencing July 1, 2004, the Maximum Special Tax B for property where a
building permit has been issued shall be increased by the percentage change in the Consumer Price
Index with a maximum annual increase of six percent (6.00%) and a minimum increase of two
percent (2.00%) of the amount in effect in the previous Fiscal Year.
EXHIBIT D
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1
BOUNDARY MAP
SHEET 1 OF 2
Assessor Parcel Numbers
within the Amended Boundaries of
Community Facilities District No.
2003-1:
431-020-007
431-040-026
431-040-027
433-030-001
433-030-002
431-050-018
431-050-024
431-100-002
431-100-007
431-100-014
431-160-006 thru 431-160-009
431-180-018
431-180-020
431-180-021
431-180-061
431-190-019
431-190-020
431-190-021
431-190-024
431-410-003 thru 431-410-015
434-160-009
434-160-010
434-300-002
434-300-011
434-300-012
434-300-013
435-240-021
AMENDED BOUNDARIES OF
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
This map amends the proposed boundary map for City of San Jacinto Community
Facilities District No. 2003-1, County of Riverside, State of California, prior
recorded at Book 55 of Maps and Assessment and Community Facilities Districts
at Page 2-3, as instrument No. 2003-817116, on October 17, 2003 in the office
of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California.
(1) Fled in the office of the City Clerk of the City of
San Jacinto this day of 2003. (3) Filed this day of 2003, at the
hour of o'clock _m, in Book of
Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities
Dorothy Chouinard, San Jacinto City Clerk Districts at page and as Instrument
No. in the office of the County
Recorder of Riverside County, State of California.
(2) I hereby certify that the within map showing the
amended boundaries of Community Facilities District
No. 2003-1, Riverside County, State of Califomia, was
approved by the City Council at a regular meeting
thereof, held on this day of
2003, by its Resolution No.
Dorothy Chouinard, San Jacinto City Clerk
Prepared by David Toussig do Associates. Inc.
Fee
County Recorder of Riverside County
Reference Is hereby made to
the Assessor maps of the
County of Riverside for an
exact description of the
lines and dimensions of
each lot and parcel.
SHEET 2 OF 2
Ramona Exwy
Private Rd
% Scott St
c
a
W /
U
AMENDED BOUNDARIES OF
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2003-1
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Record Rd
urcro an
Cottonwood Ave
7Ih Street
G,-16G-OBI
Esplanade
w-m .010
Bergin St
Shaver St
Commonwe
Washington Ave
LEGEND
Amended Boundaries of Community
Facilities District No. 2003-1
Waterway
Assessor Parcel Number
w.300.011
2nd St
E Evans St
AGENDA ITEM 4. I
February 5, 2004
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Traffic Calming Improvements, placement and Installation of Speed
Humps along Warwick Street, Roanoke Street, Serena Court and
Savory Lane and standards for traffic calming improvements
RECOMMENDATION:
By motion approve the policy recommended by the Council Transportation Sub -
Committee and authorize installation of speed humps on Warwick Street,
Roanoke Street, Serena Court, and Savory Lane.
BACKGROUND:
At the regular Council meeting of December 4, 2003, staff was directed to meet
with Council's Transportation Sub -Committee (Mayor Ayres and Vice Mayor
Buydos). On January 12, 2004, the Council Sub -Committee reviewed the speed
hump requests and standards previously reviewed by Council and made the
following recommendations:
o Speed humps and other traffic calming improvements may be considered
by City Council and implemented subject to compliance with all the
following criteria:
A. 51% of residents along the proposed street must sign and submit a
petition requesting installation of traffic calming improvements
B. Traffic calming improvement shall be considered only within
existing residential developments (with speed limits of 25 MPH)
with curb to curb improvements not to exceed 40' (one lane in each
direction
C. The length of the streets shall be at minimum of 800' and shall not
be a cul-de-sac
?cFrT3e._
City Manager:
Finance Director:
Page 1 of 2
D. The residential street shall not fall within established transit and
emergency routes
E. Street grades shall not exceed 5%
F. Sight distance shall be evaluated and considered
G. The City Council shall review and consider the installation of traffic
calming devices
o The Sub -Committee also recommends that the Council authorize
installation of speed humps at the following locations:
A. Warwick Street between Kirby and Camden Road
B. Roanoke between Kirby and Camden Road
C. Serena Lane between Calle San Sebastian to Cortina Drive
E. Savory Lane between De Anza and Ramona Boulevard
JUSTIFICATION:
Enhance safety and reduce speeding along residential streets.
BUDGETARY IMPACT:
No funds are currently allocated in FY 2003-04. The Council Sub -Committee
recommends that appropriate funds from development agreement funds be set
aside and reflected on mid -year adjustments - estimated cost $40,000.
The City Manager continues to recommend to the Council that the development
agreement fee money only be used for supporting the deficit spending that
currently exists in the General Fund. City Manager recommends that the Council
use non -general fund money for these purposes, such as Measure "A."
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Speed Hump Design
2. Locations for Proposed Speed Hump Installation
Page 2 of 2
SPEED HUMPS AND TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES FOR
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA
r O M•
r6rvi�
ti
SECTION A -A
CURB FACE
j_ TACK
CONCRETE COAT
yI Z
w�
> 12" MIN
w f 36" MAX
GUTTER
ROADWAY
rr2' .(CENTERLINE
of
ADVANCE --.--- '
WARNING SIGN
-1� c Ex. C& - -
100' TYP.
3
'2
12'
ADVANCE
WARNING
f SIGN
EX. 4_;=
11fPAVEMENT SZatCQ
PLAN VIEW
12" REFLECTIVE WHITE
CHEVRONS
W 37
(MODIFIED)
MPH
7' 1-3/4" TSPAR,
OR EQUAL, POST
WITH 2" BASE
ADVANCE
WARNING
SIGN
W 6(15
SPEED HUMPS AND TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES FOR
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA
gr � —
1
n ta-
-a N N N
ti
SECTION A -A
mg
Z > 12" MIN
og
a /r 36" MAX
U
L.—
TACK
CONCRETE COAT
GUTTER
ROADWAY
��2' CCENTERLINE
f L/
8' 1 100' i TYP.
12'
S r .EX. C&G
1
—� PAVEMENT aL
ADVANCE
W RNE G ~�- EX. C&G
A+
ADVANCE
wARNII;iG SIGN
4-1
arm
12" REFLECTIVE WHITE
CHEVRONS
PLAN VIEW
W 37
(MODIFIED)
W 6,(15)
7r 1-3/4" TELESPAR,
TOR EQUAL, POST
- WITH 2" BASE
,ADVANCE
WARNING
SIGN
ZIP
32567 ass
s
02033 Directory 8 Maps USA, Inc.
NI ROhls Reserved
City of
$an Jacinto
aEFLECIION
STONEY
MOUNTAIN
RANCH
ZIP
92545
pL Vier
ZIP
92582
Ff x..I.Awe
�cyyxe'
irrir
Bolded W er Co.
Pal *Call
Home and O. Independent Distri6ub
Seeing Hanel/Son looMo Volley Since 1983
1800/444-Pute 11731 Vets Ma8 Boa 350
C
/ df eN 1
b R ie.� ✓M q
..—..AAr ma . 1
f rrA•xvxe.m+r,. e{ E q
Of COMMERCE P
SOBOBA
HOT
µy SPRINGS
81 Home Equity
Ron Lansing
idacte hkr!gage I
ICC East Florida
t r rM. CA RirE4:
RIVERSIDE
COUNTY
PARK
HILL ZP
T
61
n..
cn.rnon
AGENDA ITEM -4.c
February 5, 2004
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Jim Barron, Fire Chief 9Q
SUBJECT: Fire Department's Recommended Site Plan for Future Fire Stations
needed to serve the City at build -out
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Fire Department's revised site plan proposal for future fire stations
needed to serve the City at build -out. An additional recommendation as to
staffing needs for each fire station is also provided for Council consideration.
Direct staff to bring back a detailed zone map with assessor's parcel numbers
(APNs) and a recommended site for a new fire station in the vicinity of
Sanderson Avenue and Cottonwood Avenue.
BACKGROUND:
The City Manager directed the Fire Department to prepare a Plan to identify our
City's future fire stations and staffing needs to stay abreast of development of
development in the City. Council reviewed an initial Plan presented at its
December 18, 2003 meeting; however, requested that additional information be
taken into consideration. In particular, Council wished to have the Plan illustrate
future major roadways and the impacts of the Highway 79 realignment.
During our Growth Workshop held in February, 2003, Council was briefed by
staff as to our inability to provide adequate emergency response times to the
west end of the City where extensive subdivision development is in the current
planning stages. The Fire Department identified five (5) minutes as the desired
maximum response time. This is particularly critical in life-saving
rescues/medical-aids and extinguishment of structure fires prior to the flashover
stage.
City Manager:
pprova
Finance Director:
Page 1 of 3
With this response goal in mind, staff recommends the following future fire station
sites and staffing:
Station Location Staffing
1 Sanderson Avenue and engine company
Cottonwood Avenue
2 Hewitt Avenue and relocate Engine 25
Esplanade Avenue crew / future truck
company
3
4
State Street north of engine company
Ramona Expressway
Ramona Expressway engine company and
and Cawston Avenue truck company
Staff also recommends that a dedicated Battalion Chief / Fire Marshal position be
created when the third fire station comes on line. This position will assure proper
personnel supervision, emergency management and fire protection planning
overview for the City.
The above recommendations were prepared taking into consideration National
Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards and the Riverside County Fire
Department's Goals and Objectives for Emergency Services Delivery for
Unincorporated Areas.
JUSTIFICATION:
This Plan allows the City to better prepare for future fire station and staffing
needs, as well as the associated costs. Identifying these potential expenses now
will help to structure our newly created Public Safety CFD.
BUDGETARY IMPACT:
At current dollars, the staffing costs would be as follows:
Cost per engine
Cost per ladder truck
Cost per battalion chief
$901,995
$1,032,171
$150,000
Page 2 of 3
Staffs experience as to costs associated with constructing a fire station is
approximately $1.2 million, excluding land acquisition. Additionally, a fully -
equipped fire engine currently costs approximately $350,000 and a ladder truck
is $850,000.
ATTACHMENTS:
Map — City of San Jacinto Future Roadways / Hwy. 79 Realignment
"Response Study for Proposed San Jacinto City Fire Stations"
Page 3 of 3
Future Bridge
Future Interchange
Ramona Cajalco Corridor
Limited Access Highway
Collector
u,.LCC wo1A co. oov
Arterial
Urban Arterial
Major
Secondary
City Limits
Roadway
RESPONSE STUDY FOR PROPOSED SAN JACINTO CITY FIRE STATIONS
Bina
rI4
rorpos
ocation or
In ustrial Fire Station
Arida
���Proposed Location for
Cottonwood Fire Station
1
1 Inch equals 1.163809 miles
Legend
Future Interchange
Future Bridge
Proposed Location for
College Fire Station
y,
Proposed Location for
New Downtown Fire Station
?1,4„..io-11°'-eliAtillri,i
Ildl�
.T��
im �kF,IIIg:iIIii111Ir
- I..: w ■memv
i' • s, l a
��1•11■1IMI1 �IIIIIIIIIiNIMIP1111il htr®2 .ME,
11111 _do II alc, Lu=_ ^J 'ialiniu
AGENDA ITEM 4.3
February 5, 2004
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Traffic Reports — Intersections of State Street and Idyllwild Drive,
and Chase Street, and Main Street Surveys
RECOMMENDATION:
By motion: 1) adopt traffic report dated October 28, 2003 for intersection of State
Street and Idyllwild Drive; 2) adopt traffic report dated November 10, 2003 for
Main Street between Sheriff Avenue and Ramona Expressway; 3) adopt traffic
report dated January 23, 2004 for Chase Street at Cypress and Sagecrest Drive;
and 4) authorize implementation of recommendations as presented in the
reports.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council at a regular meeting directed staff to prepare and submit
various traffic reports, including consideration for traffic calming and stop signs
along Main Street, signal and other improvements at intersection of Idyllwild
Drive and State Street. In addition to these reports, staff also requested update
of speed surveys and review of speed and stop sign warrants along Chase Street
north of Ramona Expressway.
App
City Manager:
Finance Director:
Page 1 of 3
The enclosed traffic reports are prepared by City's consulting traffic engineer (RK
Engineering Group, Inc.). Mr. Kahn will be present at the Council meeting to
assist with the review of the reports and respond to questions. The following are
summary of findings of the individual reports:
o State Street and Idyllwild Drive — Page 4 and Exhibits "D" and "E" of the
reports identify options available to prohibit left turn movements from
Idyllwild Drive. The report recommends future signalization and speed
reduction along State Street. Staffs recommendation is to implement
Exhibit "E."
o Main Street Traffic Calming- Pages 4 and 5 and Exhibits "D" and "E" of the
report identifies the recommended 4-way stop sign installation at
intersection of Main Street with Sheriff Street, and Mistletoe and Hewitt
Avenue, to be implemented along with Main Street Pavement
Rehabilitation, which is scheduled to start early Summer 2004.
o Chase Street — Refer to pages 5 and 6 and Exhibit "D" of the report,
recommending 4-way stop sign installation at intersection of Chase Street
with Cypress and Sagecrest Drive.
City wide speed survey will be submitted to Council at letter date. A full copy of
the reports is available at City Clerk's office for Council's review.
JUSTIFICATION:
Enhance and improve safety and reduce accident rates.
BUDGETARY IMPACT:
An estimated $35,000 will be needed to offset the implementation of the traffic
engineer recommendations for the above mentioned intersections. The
Transportation Sub -Committee recommended the utilization of development
agreement funds to offset the cost of these improvements.
The City Manager continues to recommend to the Council that the development
agreement fee money only be used for supporting the deficit spending that
currently exists in the General Fund. City Manager recommends that the Council
use non -general fund money for these purposes, such as Measure "A."
Page 2 of 3
ATTACHMENTS:
1. State Street (SR-79) at Idyl!wild Drive Traffic Study dated October 28,
2003 (partial report)
2. Main Street Traffic Review and Traffic Calming Devices dates
November 10, 2003 (partial report)
3. Chase Street at Cypress Drive and Sagecrest Drive All -Way Stop
Dated January 23, 2004 (partial report)
Page 3 of 3
STATE STREET (SR-79) AT IDYLLWILD DRIVE
INTERSECTION REVIEW
San Jacinto, California
engineering
group, inc.
engineering
group, inc.
October 28, 2003
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
c/o Mr. Habib Motlagh
TRI-LAKE CONSULTANTS, INC.
170 Wilkerson Avenue, Suite D
Perris, CA 92570-2200
transportation planning • traffic engineering
acoustical / air quality studies
Subject: State Street (SR-79) at Idyllwild Drive Intersection Review
Dear Mr. Motlagh:
Introduction
RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) is pleased to submit this review of the State Street (SR-79)
at Idyllwild Drive intersection in the City of San Jacinto. The analysis location is shown in
Exhibit A. Since State Street (SR-79) is a State Highway, the intersection is controlled to a
substantial extent by the State.
The purpose of this analysis is to develop recommendations to further improve current
operations at this intersection. The analysis will determine existing conditions, and whether or
not a traffic signal is warranted at the intersection of State Street (SR-79) at Idyllwild Drive
based upon existing conditions. Also, a review of accidents has been conducted for this
intersection and recommended improvements are suggested in the recommendations section
of this report.
This review will include potential access restrictions for Idyllwild Drive at its intersection
with State Street (SR-79) and the warrants for a traffic signal.
Existing Conditions
Exhibit B illustrates the existing geometric condition at the intersection of State Street (SR-79)
at Idyllwild Drive. State Street (SR-79) is a four -lane roadway with a striped median at its
intersection with Idyllwild Drive. Idyllwild Drive is a two-lane undivided roadway, which
intersects State Street (SR-79) at a significant angle. The intersection is stop controlled along
Idyllwild Drive in the eastbound and westbound directions. The State Street (SR-79)
approaches are not controlled at this time. However, a traffic signal exists at the intersection
of State Street (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway located approximately 700 feet north of the
20201 s.w. birch street, suite 250
newport beach, california 92660
tel 949.474.0809 fax 949.474.0902
hip://www.rkengineer.com
intersection. An advance -warning flasher is located at the northeast corner of the intersection
of State Street (SR-79) at Idyllwild Drive. Photographs of the existing intersection are shown
in Appendix A. This includes photographs from each of the four approaches at the
intersection.
Existing traffic volumes for the study area intersection are shown in Exhibit C. The traffic and
pedestrian count sheets are included in Appendix B. Hourly approach traffic counts are
tabulated in Table 1. Existing lane configurations at the intersection are shown in Exhibit B.
The posted speed limit on State Street (SR-79) north of Idyllwild Drive is 50 mph and 40 mph
south of the intersection. The posted speed limit on Idyllwild Drive is 25 mph. Based upon a
recent speed survey, the 85th percentile speed on State Street north of Idyllwild Drive is
46 mph, and 50 mph south of Idyllwild Drive. The speed limit north of Idyllwild Drive is
somewhat higher than what is indicated by the 85th percentile speed, and the speed limit
south of Idyllwild Drive has lower than what is indicated by the 85th percentile speed. State
Street is considered a rural street for the purposes of the traffic signal warrants and an all -
way stop analysis, because the speeds are over 40 mph. The speed survey worksheets are
included in Appendix C.
Accident reports were provided by the San Jacinto Police Department (see Appendix D). These
statistics are summarized and presented in Table 2, based upon the following formula:
Accidents per No. of Accidents * 32,877
Million Vehicles = ADT * No. of Months
According to the San Jacinto Police Department records, there have been five (5) accidents
during Year 2003, three (3) accidents during Year 2002 and two (2) accidents during
Year 2001.
As shown in Table 2, the calculated accident rate for the study intersection is higher than the
expected rate for similar types of intersections. Vehicles are currently exceeding the speed
limit on the port of this roadway south of Idyllwild Drive and also making turning movements
that are conflicting with through movement.
The intersection of State Street (SR-79) and Idyllwild Drive has been evaluated for a traffic
signal using Caltrans eleven (11) traffic signal warrants criteria. The following warrant criteria
are applicable to the existing traffic conditions:
Warrant No.
Description
1
Minimum Vehicle Volume
Interruption of Continuous Traffic
6
Minimum Pedestrian Volume
School Crossings
Accident Experience
Systems
2
Warrant No.
Description
8
Combination of Warrants
9
Four -Hour Volume
10
Peak Hour Delay
11
Peak Hour Volume
Since the 85th percentile vehicle speed on State Street (SR-79) is over 40 miles per hour, the
intersection of State Street (SR-79) at Idyllwild has been evaluated using rural area condition
criteria.
The intersection of State Street (SR-79) and Idyllwild Drive currently does meet four (4) of
the warrants for a traffic signal based upon the Caltrans warrant analysis. In addition, the
accident Warrant 6 is met, except that less restrictive changes have not been made yet at
the intersection to improve the accident experience.
The following warrants have been met at this time:
Warrant 1, Minimum Vehicle Volume - No (80%)
Warrant 2, interruption of Continuous Traffic - Yes
Warrant 6, Accident Experience — Yes (except less restrictive measures than a traffic
signal have not been taken)
Warrant 8, Combination of Warrants - Yes
Warrant 9, Four -Hour Volume - Yes
Warrant 11, Peak Hour Volume - Yes
Since there is a substantial difference in traffic volumes on State Street (SR-79), which has
an 18,000 to 20,000 ADT in comparison to Idyllwild Drive which has a traffic volume of
1,000 to 2,600 ADT. All -way stop warrants would not be met at this intersection due to
the substantial difference in volumes between the north/south and east/west approaches.
Conclusions
Based upon the analysis, the intersection of State Street (SR-79) at Idyllwild Drive does have
a higher Accident Experience than what would be expected at similar intersections. This is
probably caused by the substantial angle that Idyllwild Drive intersects State Street (SR-79).
it is difficult for vehicles making eastbound or westbound left turns or going through the
intersections to actually see the northbound and southbound vehicles on State Street
(SR-79). Even though the traffic signal warrants have been met at this intersection, it is
recommended due to the proximity of the intersection to Ramona Express Way, less
restrictive measures be taken first to see if they can improve the safety at the intersection.
This could include modifications to the signing/striping, turning movement and/or through
movement restrictions in the east/west direction. Furthermore, the City may pursue with
Caltrans lowering the speed limit north of Idyllwild Drive on State Street (SR-79).
Recommendations
The following recommendations are suggested for this intersection:
1. Install temporal channelization to restrict access at the intersection. There are two
options that are available: Option A (Exhibit D) would include a "worm" median to
prohibit east/west through and left turn movements on Idyllwild Drive at its
intersection with State Street (SR-79). A conceptual layout of this recommendation is
included in Exhibit D. Option B (Exhibit E) would limit the east/west approaches to
right turns only by the use of raised channelization islands. Either of the two options
would prevent the improvements, which are involved in the current accidents at the
intersection.
2. Discuss with Caltrans installing a traffic signal at the intersection.
3. Request Caltrans to reduce the speed limit on State Street north of Idyllwild Drive
based upon the recent speed survey.
4. Continue to provide additional police enforcement at the intersection to discourage
illegal through or turning movements once the access restrictions are implemented.
RK is pleased to provide this intersection review for the intersection of State Street (SR-79)
at Idyllwild Drive. If you have any questions regarding this analysis or need further review
information, please do not hesitate to call me at (949) 474-0809.
Sincerely,
RK ENGINEERING GROUP
VC
Robert Kahn, P.E.
Principal
Attachments
'C A c e. S T 4.5
RK: rd/RK 1891. doc 4
JN: 0328-03-03
Exhibits
i
N
0328-03-03 (ExA)
• = Study Area Intersection
STATE STREET (SR-79) AT IDYLLWILD DRIVE INTERSECTION REVIEW, San Jacinto, Califomia
Exhibit A
Location Map
CE103 engineering
group, inc.
• = Study Area Intersection
0328-03-03 (ExA)
STATE STREET (SR-79) AT IDYLLWILD DRIVE INTERSECTION REVIEW, San Jacinto, Califomia
Exhibit A
Location Map
fini engineering
group, inc.
0328-03-03(Ex13)
(TO RAMONA EXPRESSWAY)
EXIST. 'Cr
EXIST SW
(TYPICAL)
EXIST. C/C
(TYPICAL)
N. STATE STREET
II
II
I II
I II
13'
15'
14' 13'
1
5'
0
Xn
T
EXIST. 'SIGNAL AHEAD
FLASHING BEACON (REF.)
EXIST..C7'
EXIST. 'RI'
Exhibit B
Existing Conditions
STATE STREET (SR-79) AT IDYLLWILD DRIVE INTERSECTION REVIEW, San Jacinto, California
�ry
RI(
engineering
group, inc.
Exhibit C
Existing Traffic Volumes and Speeds
Legend:
Ramona Exwy.
21,712 = Average Daily Traffic (2-Way)
110,8561 = Average Daily Traffic (One -Way)
46 MPH I __
38-47 MP
N
0328-03-03 (EXC)
85th % Speed
10 MPH Pace Speed
STATE STREET (SR-79) AT IDYLLWILD DRIVE INTERSECTION REVIEW, San Jacinto, California
R1t
engineering
group, inc.
EXIST. EP
(TYPICAL)
EXIST. 'R1'
EXIST. 'G7'
EXIST SW
(TYPICAL)
EXIST. C/G
(TYPICAL)
(TO RAMONA EXPRESSWAY)
1 I
C — I F I II at.k_
II
111
I II •
I II
111
,,.1N,
N. STATE STREET
N
0328-03-03 (ExD)
t
IIL
II
II
2111
II
II
II
11
13' 15' 14'
13'
2' WIOE PCC
MEOIAN
EXIST. 'SIGNAL MEAD'
FLASHING BEACON (REF.)
EXIST. '07'
EXIST. 'Rt'
Exhibit D
Access Option "A"
STATE STREET (5R-79) AT IDYLLWILD DRIVE INTERSECTION REVIEW, San Jacinto, California
♦ti
engineering
group, inc.
EXIST. EP
(TYPICAL)
EXIST. 'RI'
EXIST. '07'
EXIST SW-
(TYP)
EXIST. (TYPICAL)
(O RAMONA EXPRESSWAY)
III
,II
1 6 II.;
� I I Ft 1111 A);
\ I I,N
\ I 1L II�
\ I Raised P.y.. T/ed;an
II III
II
N. STATE STREET
13'
15'
14 113'
EXIST. 'SIGNAL AHEAD'
FLASIINC BEACON (REF.)
EXIST. 'G7'
EXIST. 'RI'
(1YPIGI.)
n\ tt
1 \\� ``(
0,,6
Exhibit E
Access Option "B"
Raised P.C.C. Median
NEM CET 29
()
0328-03-03 (ExE)
STATE STREET (SR-79) AT IDYLLWILD DRIVE INTERSECTION REVIEW, San Jacinto, California
111/1 engineering
group, inc.
S San
5
Jacinto Ave
co .o
vib
.Q
N San Jacinto
Sheriff Ave.
Ave.
Jordan Ave
Alessandro Ave.
Mistletoe Ave.
Hewitt Ave.
Vernon Ave
m
m
5
Camino Los Banos St.
z
engineering
group, inc.
transportation planning • traffic engineering
acoustical / air quality studies
November 10, 2003
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
c/o Mr. Habib Motlagh
TRI-LAKE CONSULTANTS, INC.
170 Wilkerson Avenue, Suite D
Perris, CA 92570-2200
Subject: Main Street Traffic Review and Traffic Calming, City of San Jacinto
Dear Mr. Motlagh:
Introduction
RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) is pleased to submit this review of traffic conditions and
traffic calming for Main Street in the City of San Jacinto. The analysis locations are shown in
Exhibit A. The traffic review will focus on the following intersections:
North -South Street
East-West Street
Sheriff Avenue
Main Street
Mistletoe Avenue
Main Street
Hewitt Avenue
Main Street
Camino Los Banos Street
Main Street
In addition, RK will review potential traffic calming measures along Main Street to help
slow traffic down.
The purpose of this analysis is to review recommendations to evaluate the study area
intersections for all -way stop traffic signals and to determine traffic calming measures, which
could be implemented along Main Street east of Sheriff Avenue. The analysis will determine
existing conditions, and whether or not all -way stop controls are warranted at the study area
intersections. Speed surveys, traffic counts and a review of accidents have been conducted
for these intersections and recommended improvements are suggested in the
recommendation section of this report.
The traffic study will look at potential implementation of all -way stop control at the study area
intersections, especially with respect to protecting existing crosswalks, which cross Main
Street.
20201 s.w. birch street, suite 250
newport beach, california 92660
tel 949.474.0809 fax 949.474.0902
http://www.rkengineer.com
Photographs taken along Main Street are included in Appendix A. The photographs at Sheriff
Avenue and Main Street were taken during the reconstruction of Main Street, which has
subsequently been paved and is currently open to traffic. Sketches of the existing study area
intersections are included in Appendix B. Main Street is an east -west two-lane roadway
between Sheriff Avenue and Ramona Expressway. It has a width varying from approximately
24 feet in the downtown area to approximately 50 feet in the area east of Jordan Avenue.
The study area intersections are currently controlled by stop signs in a north -south direction.
No stop signs or traffic signals control east -west movements along Main Street. As previously
noted, photographs of the intersections are shown in Appendix A. These include photographs
from each of the four (4) approaches at the intersection. The downtown area photographs
depicts the roadway prior to the completion of improvements, which are now completed.
Existing traffic volumes for the study area intersections are shown in Exhibit B. The traffic and
pedestrian count sheets are included in Appendix C. Hourly approach traffic counts are
tabulated in Tables 1 to 4. The existing lane configurations at the intersections are shown in
Appendix B. The posted speed limit on Main Street is 40 miles per hour. Based upon a recent
speed survey, the 85th percentile speed on Main Street east of Sheriff Avenue is 39 miles per
hour, and east of Hewitt Avenue is 44 miles per hour. Main Street is considered an Urban
Street for purposes of traffic signal warrants and all -way stop analysis at those locations
where the speeds are less than 40 miles per hour. Where speeds exceeded 40 miles per hour
it is considered rural conditions. The speed survey worksheets are included in Appendix D.
Accident reports were provided by the San Jacinto Police Department (see Appendix E).
These statistics are summarized and presented in Table 5, based upon the following formula:
Accidents per No. of Accidents * 32.877
Million Vehicles = ADT * No. of Months
According to the San Jacinto Police Department records, there have been no accidents during
the years of 1999 to 2001 at the intersection of Sheriff Avenue at Main Street, 2 accidents in
the vicinity of Mistletoe Avenue at Main Street, 2 accidents at the intersection of Hewitt
Avenue at Main Street, and there have been no accidents at the intersection of Camino Los
Banos at Main Street.
As shown in Table 5, the calculated accident rates for the study area intersections are lower
than the expected rate for similar type of intersections, except for the Main Street intersection
of Hewitt Avenue. Traffic signal warrants at the four (4) study area intersections were
reviewed with respect to Caltrans average daily traffic and peak hour traffic signal warrants.
At the present time the four (4) study area intersections do not meet the average daily traffic
or peak hour warrants for traffic signals based upon Caltrans' criteria, although the
intersection of Hewitt Avenue at Main Street is very close to meeting the peak hour warrant.
The four (4) study area intersections have also been reviewed with respect to all -way stop
control warrants. Based upon the MUTCD (Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices)
criteria, the only intersection which meets all -way stop warrants is the intersection of Hewitt
Avenue at Main Street. However, for purposes of controlling traffic in the vicinity of the
2
existing crosswalks, protecting pedestrian crossing, and because of the type of adjacent land
uses, all -way stop control is recommended at the following intersections:
North -South Street
East-West Street
Sheriff Avenue
Main Street
Mistletoe Avenue
Main Street
Hewitt Avenue
Main Street
Although it is not a study area intersection, an all -way stop control is also recommended for
the intersection of Jordan Avenue at Main Street. The reason for this all -way stop is because
of the potential for high pedestrian activity in the downtown area and the intersection is the
transition point from the section of Main Street with the two-way left -turn median to the
downtown area, which includes chokers and angle parking.
Traffic Calming Opportunity
A number of traffic calming techniques are available to control vehicle speeds and traffic
volumes along the Main Street. A summary of the traffic calming opportunities are included
in Exhibit C, and could include such items as follows:
• Chokers
• Speed humps
• Chicanes
• Diagonal diverters
• Semi diverters
• Roundabouts
• Bulbouts
• Pavement texture
• Rumble strips
• Striping
As a long-term objective, it may be desirable to continue the angle chokers/parking, which
have been implemented in the downtown area. This represents relatively high cost capital
improvement that potentially could be extended to the east as funds become available. As a
near -term solution, striping could be implemented to narrow the wider sections of
Main Street east of Jordan Avenue. Main Street east of Jordan Avenue has a curb -to -curb
width of approximately 50 feet. The area shown in Exhibit D indicates where the existing
50-foot curb -to -curb section of Main Street could be narrowed through striping to provide a
two-way left turn striped median and one (1) travel lane in each direction. In addition, white
4" edge lines could be painted parallel to the curb where parallel parking could occur. The
Main Street typical striping concept in this area is shown in Exhibit E. This shows a typical
condition, which provides an 11-foot striped median two 12-foot travel lanes and a 7.5-foot
curbside -parking lane. This striping concept would reduce the perceived width of the
3
roadway to drivers; therefore, potentially reducing traffic speeds from what currently occurs in
the wider sections of Main Street.
The striping traffic calming technique is a measure that could be implemented at a relative
low cost without reconstructing the existing curb and gutter, rather than the textured
pavement and other improvements, which have previously been implemented in downtown
San Jacinto. The downtown San Jacinto concept of chokers and angle parking could be
implemented to the east as funds become available.
Conclusions
Based upon this analysis, additional traffic control devices (i.e. all -way stop) are recommended
at some of the study area intersections, as noted on Exhibit D. Even though two of these
intersections do not warrant an all -way stop control from a volume standpoint, there are
other factors which indicate they would be desirable in this particular area. In addition, the
revised striping concept could be implemented along Main Street from Jordan Avenue to
Camino Las Ramblas that would provide for a two-way striped left turn median and one (1)
traffic lane in each direction with a white edge line within the parking area. Furthermore, in
the future, the City of San Jacinto could pursue implementation of choker and angle parking
as has been implemented in the Downtown area further to the east as capital funds become
available.
Recommendations
The following recommendations are suggested for these intersections:
1. Install all -way stop signs, stop bars, stop legends, and advance warning signs on Main
Street at the intersections of Sheriff Avenue and Main Street, Mistletoe Avenue and
Main Street and Hewitt Avenue at Main Street. Also, install an all -way stop control at
the intersection of Jordan Avenue at Main Street. All installations should follow
Caltrans design requirements and advance warning signs should be posted in advance
of each intersection along with appropriate pedestrian crossing warning signs.
2. Implement revised striping as conceptually shown in Exhibit E for Main Street east of
Jordan Avenue which would include a striped two-way left turn median, one (1)
12-foot traffic lane in each direction, and white edge lines parallel to the existing curb
at the edge of the parking lane. This would extend to the point where Main Street
narrows to less than 50 feet east of Camino Los Banos Street. Transitions from the
two-way left turn medians to a double yellow centerline stripe will need to be provided
approaching Jordan Avenue and Camino Los Banos Street on Main Street.
3. Develop a long-term program to implement the choker and angle parking design that
has been implemented in Downtown San Jacinto further to the east as funding
becomes available.
Ms, -' s i i►ex 1
4
4. Continue to monitor traffic conditions within the study area to determine the
effectiveness of the improvements that are implemented.
RK is pleased to provide this review of Main Street in the City of San Jacinto. If you have
any questions regarding this analysis or need further review of this information, please do
not hesitate to call me at (949Y 474-0809.
Sincerely,
RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
Robert Kahn, P.E.
Principal
Attachments
RK: rd/RK 1953.doc
JN:0328-03-02
Exhibits
0
4. c
U
duoco
Od c
40 fa
W Main St.
N
0328-03-02-EX_A
ai
0
c
U
W7thSt. '
m
0
•
Mistletoe Ave.
ai
c
0
•
Hewitt Ave.
1 st St.
E Main St.
E 7 th St.
•
Exhibit A
Location Map
god
c
0
to
MAIN STREET TRAFFIC REVIEW , San Jacinto, California
LEGEND:
• = Study Area Intersections
an engineering
group, inc.
W Main St.
39 MPH
30-39 MPH
0
Exhibit B
Existing Traffic Volumes and Speeds
1 st Si
E Main St.
5,772
0
0
c
W7thSt.
0328-03-02-EX_B
to
to
5,924
6,576
rn
6,568
>
zm
\ 4,624
44 MPH
34-43 MPH
Camino Los Banos St.
cc a
.f0e
\,a
E 7 th St.
5,420
Legend:
2,286 = Average Daily Traffic
39 MPH _
30-39 MPHI
85th % Speed
10 MPH 'ace Speed
MAIN STREET TRAFFIC REVIEW , San Jacinto, California
RI(
•
engineering
group, Inc.
i
0328-03-02-EX_C
Exhibit C
Typical Traffic Calming Devics
Speed
humps
SOURCE: CIVIL ENGINEERING,
MAGAZINE, JANUARY 2000
MAIN STREET TRAFFIC REVIEW , San Jacinto, Califomia
RK
engineering
group, inc.
N
0328-03-02-EX_D
Q
0
W7thSt.
a)
N
w
2
1 st St.
E Main St.
E 7 th St.
Camino Los Banos St.
Exhibit D
Recommendations
t0
to
Legend:
O$ = All Way Stop
= Paint Two -Way Striped Median (Detail 32)
and Right Edge Lines (Detail 278) (See Exhibit D)
* * = Paint Transition Strippin from Two -Way Left Turn Median (Detail 32)
to double Yellow Stripe (Detail 22)
MAIN STREET TRAFFIC REVIEW , San Jacinto, California
Rat
engineering
group, inc.
Exhibit E
Main Street Typical Striping Concept
R-1
dOlS
T
sr
NOTES:
See Appendix G for Caltrans
Marking Standards.
0328-03-02-EX_E
Side Street (Typical)
STOP
Main Street
CURB LINE
CURB LINE
R-1
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
OPaint Caltrans Detail 32 (Two -Way Left Turn Lane)
O Paint Caltrans Detail 27B (White 4" Right Edge Line)
MAIN STREET TRAFFIC REVIEW San Jacinto, California
Rlt
engineering
group, inc.
CHASE STREET AT CYPRESS DRIVE
AND SAGECREST DRIVE
ALL -WAY STOP REVIEW (01/23/04)
San Jacinto, California
engineering
group, inc.
engineering
group, inc.
January 23, 2004
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
c/o Mr. Habib Motlagh
TRI-LAKE CONSULTANTS, INC.
170 Wilkerson Avenue, Suite D
Perris, CA 92570-2200
transportation planning • traffic engineering
acoustical / air quality studies
Subject: Chase Street at Cypress Drive and Sagecrest Drive
All -Way Stop Review (Revised)
Dear Mr. Motlagh:
Introduction
RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) is pleased to submit this review of the Chase Street at
Cypress Drive and Sagecrest Drive intersections in the City of San Jacinto. The analysis
locations are shown in Exhibit A.
The purpose of this analysis is to develop recommendations to further improve current
operations at these intersections. The analysis will determine existing conditions, and whether
or not all -way stops are warranted at the intersections along Chase Street based upon existing
conditions. Also, a review of accidents and a speed survey along Chase Street has been
conducted for these intersections and recommended improvements are suggested in the
recommendations section of this report.
Existing Conditions
The study intersections are located in a residential community in the City of San Jacinto.
Chase Street is a north -south residential collector street that connects the neighborhood to
Ramona Expressway to the south of the study intersections. Chase Street dead -ends
approximately 500 feet north of Sagecrest Drive, which is also an outlet street connecting
the neighborhood to State Street east of the study intersection. The location map can be
seen in Exhibit A. Photographs taken for the study area are attached in Appendix A. These
include photographs taken from each of the approaches at the intersections. The School
District is constructing a new elementary school south of Sagecrest Drive and west of State
Street.
The intersection of Chase Street and Cypress Drive is stopped controlled along Cypress Drive
in the eastbound and westbound directions, whereas, Chase Street and Sagecrest Drive is
stopped controlled along Chase Street in the northbound and southbound directions.
20201 s.w. birch street, suite 250
newport beach, california 92660
tel 949.474.0809 fax 949.474.0902
http://www.rkengineer.com
Newport Drive intersects Chase Street between the Cypress Drive and Sagecrest Drive
intersections. This T-intersection is stopped controlled on Newport Drive in the westbound
direction.
Chase Street has a curb -to -curb width of approximately 44 feet allowing for parking on
both sides of the street. Parking was observed on the streets, isolated, mainly, in front of
the homes. The streets do not have any pavement markings, except for stop lines and stop
markings at the stop -controlled locations. Exhibit B shows the existing traffic control and
the number of travel lanes for the study area.
There is roadway lighting on each of the streets but are not necessary located at the
intersections. All of the roadways have sidewalks and are located on both sides of the
streets. There were not any signs, within the study area, indicating the speed limit or
indicating any parking restrictions. The overall condition of the pavement, striping, and
sidewalks is good.
It is also worth noting that a new school will be opening within a few blocks of the study
area in the next year. This new school would mostly likely increase the number of vehicle
and pedestrian volumes when opened. However, this review of the two intersections does
not take into account the additional traffic from the school, but it is considered in the
overall recommendations.
All -Way Stop Review
The study intersections were reviewed to see whether the intersections warrant an all -way
stop control using two different methodologies: the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices' (MUTCD) warrant method and an alternative method published in the ITE
WesterniTE commonly used in the San Francisco Bay Area for neighborhood streets. Both
of these warrant analyses worksheets can be found in Appendix D.
Both of the methodologies are used as guidelines to determine if an intersection warrants
an all -way stop. The procedure quantifies the recommendation using a list of criteria in
which one or more of the criteria must be met. RK gathered information of the existing
conditions including: traffic volumes, a speed survey, and field observations to fulfill the
requirements of the analyses. Both methods require recent accident data for the
intersections. However, RK attempted to obtain accident data from the City but was unable
to acquire the information during the time of the study.
RK obtained a 24-hour traffic count, taken on August 6, 2003. The 24-hour traffic count
was taken for each approach of the two study intersections. The count showed the traffic
volume on Chase Street to have a 472 ADT (Average Daily Traffic) between the Cypress
Drive and Newport Drive and a 336 ADT between Newport Drive and Sagecrest Drive.
Pedestrian volumes were not tabulated during the 24-hour vehicle count. Tables 1 and 2
show the traffic volumes collected for each approach at the two study intersections. For
this study, RK assumed the pedestrian volume to be low and calculated the pedestrian
volumes to be approximately 10 percent of the vehicle volume for the given time period.
2
Field observations confirmed that this assumption would be adequate. The existing traffic
volumes worksheets for the study intersections are shown in Exhibit C.
RK also obtained a speed survey performed on November 6, 2003. The 85th percentile
speed (the speed that 85 percent of the vehicles are traveling or less) for Chase Street is 32
miles per hour and the 10-mile per hour pace speed (10-mile per hour group of speeds
that is most frequent) is 23 to 32 miles per hour. The 85th percentile speed and the
10-mile per hour pace speed is shown on Exhibit C, and the entire sample speed data
worksheets can be found in Appendix C.
The intersections of Chase Street at Cypress Drive and Chase Street at Sagecrest Drive have
been evaluated for an all -way stop control using the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices' all -way stop warrants criteria. The following warrant criteria are used for existing
conditions:
MUTCD All-Wav Stop Warrants
Warrant No.
Description
Results
1
Minimum Vehicle Volume
Does Not Satisfy
2
Traffic Signal Warranted
Does Not Satisfy
3
Accidents
Does Not Satisfy
Warrant 1
Both intersections could not meet the minimum traffic volume requirements of 300
vehicles over 8 hours. Even with the addition of pedestrian volumes, the total volumes of
the intersections could not meet the second requirement for Warrant 1. Since the 85th
percentile vehicle speed on Chase Avenue is below 40 miles per hour, the vehicle and
pedestrian volumes at the intersections could not be reduced. Therefore, both
intersections are unable to satisfy Warrant 1.
Warrant 2
Warrant 2 states that a four-way stop could be implemented as an interim measure when
traffic signals are warranted. Since traffic signals are not warranted, both intersections are
unable to satisfy Warrant 2.
Warrant 3
To satisfy this warrant, there must be five or more accidents that are correctable by an
all -way stop. Accident data from the San Jacinto Police Department indicate that this
warrant is not satisfied.
Result
Neither of the two intersections were able to satisfy MUTCD's warrant requirements for an
all -way stop at this time.
RK also evaluated Chase Street at Cypress Drive and Chase Street at Sagecrest Drive using an
alternative method published in the ITE WesternlTE. This method is an all -way stop
installation evaluation for residential streets commonly used in the San Francisco Bay Area
for neighborhood streets. RK has used this criteria for residential, local, and collector streets
in other areas of Riverside County. The following installation criteria are used for the
existing conditions:
ITE WesternlTE Article: All-Wav Stop Installation Criteria
Criterion No.
Description
Results
1
Volume
Does Not Satisfy
2
Accidents
Does Not Satisfy
3
Visibility
Satisfied
4
Speed
Satisfied
5
Crossing Residential Collector Streets
Satisfied
Criterion 1
RK evaluated both intersections with respect to the volume criterion. Both of the
intersections were unable to satisfy the requirements of 300 vehicles per hour for at
least eight hours during the day. Although, the side streets did account for at least 1/3
of the intersection volume, both parameters must be met to satisfy the criterion.
Criterion 2
To satisfy this criterion, there must be at least three accidents that are correctable by an
all -way stop. Accident data from the San Jacinto Police Department indicate that this
warrant is not satisfied.
Criterion 3
RK performed a sight distance review of both intersections and found the sight distance
on several approaches to be approximately 150 feet, the minimum required sight
distance for this criterion. The southbound approach at the intersection of Chase Street
and Sagecrest Drive and the westbound approach of Chase Street at Cypress Drive had
sight distances that were obstructed by existing walls. Parked vehicles near the
intersection would compound this problem. RK feels that this criterion has been met.
Criterion 4
A speed survey showed the 85th percentile speed on Chase Street to be 31 miles per
hour. Therefore, both intersections meet the requirements stipulated in Criterion 4
specifying the 85th percentile speed must be equal to or greater than 30 miles per
hour.
Criterion 5
Since both of the intersecting streets are considered collector streets to the
neighborhood and since both of the street's volumes are relatively equal, both
intersections satisfy Criterion 5: Crossing Residential Collectors.
4
Result
Both intersections have met at least two of the required criterion, therefore satisfying
WesternlTE article for multi -way stop installation criteria for neighborhood streets.
Findings
Based upon the analysis, both of the study intersections do not meet the MUTCD warrant
criteria, but do meet the WesternlTE article, Multi -Way Stop Installation Criteria for
Neighborhood Streets requirements.
The criteria in which the study intersections do meet the requirements of the ITE method
should be noted. At several of the approaches, visibility for the stopped traffic was poor
and was measured in the field equaling the minimum sight distance requirement. RK
considered this visibility criterion to be satisfied. The speed criterion was satisfied when the
85th percentile maximum speed of 30 mph was exceeded. The 85th percentile of 32 mph
is above the 30 mph criterion. The third criterion met was Criterion 5, where both
intersecting streets are considered collectors for the neighborhood. Since both connect the
neighborhood to major streets for the community and the volumes were relatively equal,
the criterion was considered satisfied.
Conclusions
Even though the intersections did not meet the MUTCD warrants, the ITE WesternlTE
article methodology surfaced several safety issues that would advocate for the placement
of all -way stops. Considering this, RK agrees that all -way stops would improve safety at
the intersections and therefore be recommended. However, RK recommends the City first
obtain the School District's "safe route to school plan" before installing the all -way stops.
With a review of the plan, the City would be better informed on the location and
placement of the stop signs, stop bars, and stop markings in relation to any new school
crosswalks for the new school.
Recommendations
A summary of project recommendations is included in Appendix D. As well, the following
recommendations are suggested for these intersections:
1. Install all -way stops at the intersections of Chase Street and Cypress Drive and Chase
Street and Sagecrest Drive after review of the new school's "safe route to school" plan.
2. The City should install stop sign ahead warning signs (W17) in advance of the
intersection at the time of the installation of stop signs.
3. Install "STOP" pavement markings 8 feet prior to the stop bars or limit lines.
5
RK is pleased to provide this intersection review for the intersections at Chase Street and
Cypress Drive and Chase Street and Sagecrest Drive. If you have any questions regarding
this analysis or need further review information, please do not hesitate to call me at
(949) 474-0809.
Sincerely,
RK ENGINEERING GROUP, IN
045
Robert Kahn, P.E.
Principal
Attachments
No. 0555
EXP. 12131105
rRAFF\C'_
RK: wg/RK1 988. doc 6
JN:0328-03-05
a kiLA---
Thomas J. Wheat
Associate
Appendices
Blodgett St.
S
Legend:
• = Study Area Intersection
I
N
0328-03-05 (EX -A)
m
0
Sagecres Dr.
Newport
Dr
Cypress
c
rn
Dr.
Monterey Dr.
CHASE STREET AT CYPRESS DRIVE AND SAGECREST DRIVE ALL -WAY STOP REVIEW , San Jacinto, California
Exhibit A
Location Map
engineering
group, inc.
Exhibit B
Existing Traffic Control and Travel Lanes
Blodgett St.
duo 2U
Legend:
2 = Number of Lanes
U = Undivided
= Stop Sign
sSagecrest Dr.
Co_
7
Newport
m
Dr. 2U o
JN
Cypress
Dr. 2U
n
N
0328-03-05 (EX-B)
CHASE STREET AT CYPRESS DRIVE AND SAGECREST DRIVE ALL -WAY STOP REVIEW, San Jacinto, Califomia
RI(
engineering
group, inc.
426
Exhibit C
Existing Traffic Volumes and Speeds
---I372 I
1213
Blodgett St.
744
Legend:
T = Stop Sign
336 = 2-Way ADT (Average Daily Traffic)
1 168 = I -Way ADT (Average Daily Traffic)
31 Mph
23-32 Mph
I
0328-03-05 (EX-C)
85th 96 Speed
10 Mph Pace Speed
32 Mph
23-32 Mph
4
Sagecrest Dr.
°I Newport
Dr.
Cypress
Dr.
0
m
0
2
CHASE STREET AT CYPRESS DRIVE AND SAGECREST DRIVE ALL -WAY STOP REVIEW, San Jacinto, Califomia
/T
512
r
--{ 35 i
1256
co
R1(
70
Q
Let
engineering
group, inc.
Exhibit D
Recommendations
Blodgett St.
Legend:
0 = All -Way Stop
= Stop Ahead Warning Sign (W I 7)
I
0328-03-05 (EX-D)
Sagecrest
Newport
Dr.
CHASE STREET AT CYPRESS DRIVE AND SAGECREST DRIVE ALL -WAY STOP REVIEW. San Jacinto, Califomia
RI(
engineering
group, inc.
Tables
TABLE 1
Hourly Traffic Counts
Chase Street at Cypress Drive
End Time
NB
SB
Subtotal
NB + SB
EB
WB
Subtotal
EB + WB
Grand
Total
1:00 AM
2
1
3
1
0
1
4
2:00 AM
5
2
7
1
1
2
9
3:00 AM
0
2
2
1
0
1
3
4:00 AM
0
4
4
4
0
4
8
5:00 AM
0
6
6
7
0
7
13
6:00 AM
1
9
10
9
2
11
21
7:00 AM
6
13
19
12
1
13
32
8:00 AM
11
13
24
21
0
21
45
9:00 AM
20
18
38
23
2
25
63
10:00 AM
10
14
24
20
5
25
49
11:00 AM
14
10
24
12
0
12
36
12 NOON
15
16
31
15
4
19
50
1:00 PM
7
11
18
17
0
17
35
2:00 PM
9
8
17
10
2
12
29
3:00 PM
18
9
27
9
3
12
39
4:00 PM
25
20
45
12
4
16
61
5:00 PM
26
17
43
16
3
19
62
6:00 PM
22
20
42
15
2
17
59
7:00 PM
28
14
42
13
1
14
56
8:00 PM
18
8
26
12
4
16
42
9:00 PM
22
9
31
8
1
9
40
10:00 PM
21
8
29
9
0
9
38
1 1:00 PM
9
4
13
7
0
7
20
12:00 AM
6
0
6
2
2
8
TOTAL
295
236
531
256
35
291
822
j: /rktables/rk 1900/RK i 988TB.xls
JN:0328-03-05
TABLE 2
Hourly Traffic Counts
Chase Street at Stagecrest Drive
End Time
NB
SB
Subtotal
NB + SB
EB
WB
Subtotal
EB + WB
Grand
Total
1:00 AM
2
0
2
0
1
1
3
2:00 AM
2
2
4
2
1
3
7
3:00 AM
0
1
1
1
0
1
2
4:00 AM
0
1
1
3
0
3
4
5:00 AM
1
4
5
11
1
12
17
6:00 AM
1
8
9
9
2
11
20
7:00 AM
7
5
12
14
4
18
30
8:00 AM
7
15
22
13
14
27
49
9:00 AM
9
11
20
13
13
26
46
10:00 AM
8
9
17
10
20
30
47
11:00 AM
11
7
18
18
19
37
55
12 NOON
12
9
21
10
21
31
52
1:00 PM
5
6
11
9
22
31
42
2:00 PM
7
5
12
6
18
24
36
3:00 PM
10
7
17
9
19
28
45
4:00 PM
10
7
17
20
33
53
70
5:00 PM
16
8
24
5
27
32
56
6:00 PM
11
7
18
10
45
55
73
7:00 PM
17
11
28
9
22
31
59
8:00 PM
8
6
14
7
29
36
50
9:00 PM
10
6
16
13
25
38
54
10:00 PM
9
3
12
13
22
35
47
11:00 PM
4
3
7
6
10
16
23
12:00 AM
1
0
1
2
4
6
7
TOTAL
168
141
309
213
372
585
894
j: irkta b les/rk 1900/RK 1988TB.xls
IN:0328-03-05
AGENDA ITEM 4.4
February 5, 2004
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Robert Lavin, Public Works Superintendent
SUBJECT: Weed Abatement on Undeveloped Parkway Areas
RECOMMENDATION:
Council shall consider options to help control weed abatement on undeveloped parkway
areas throughout the City.
BACKGROUND:
During a Council discussion at a previous Council meeting, staff was directed to look at
different alternatives to handle weed control in the City's right-of-way. Staff has concluded
that the best method available would be to utilize wood chips or wood mulch given to the
City from local tree companies (at no cost to the City). This type of material usually deters
weed growth and maintains moisture around landscaped areas. Locations for wood chip
use would be specified by both the Park Supervisor and Street Supervisor to control
specific problems or areas of high visibility and utilize the use of Community Service
Workers to spread and place wood chips or wood mulch.
Two other alternatives are:
1. Weed abatement through a contractor @ $320 per day 2-man crew, or;
2. The use of herbicide through a contractor @ approx. $300 per acre.
Retention of weed abatement practices in-house will continue utilizing the Street Division
Mower Unit and one (1) operator to concentrate on rural area shoulders and right-of-ways
within the City (west -side) and City -owned properties of facilities.
JUSTIFICATION:
Improve the atheistic of the City's parkways and major roadways and to control weed
abatement.
BUDGETARY IMPACT:
Utilizing the wood chips or wood mulch would have no budgetary impact. Funding for
alternatives numbers 1 and 2 would have to be allocated as this was not budgeted.
ATTACHMENTS:
None.
AGENDA ITEM 5.1
February 05, 2004
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Bernie Simon Finance Director
SUBJECT: Approve Warrant Register for Warrants, Prepaid Checks, and
Payroll Checks
RECOMMENDATION:
By motion, approve the warrant register for the warrants and prepaid items and
payroll checks issued since the last Council meeting, for the period ending
February 05, 2004
BACKGROUND:
The following are the warrant and check numbers for this cycle:
Warrant/Prepaid # s
Cycle Dates
Payroll Checks
Cycle Date
66362-66489
February 05, 2004
16292-16317
February 05,2004
Payroll information is available for Council review in the Finance Department.
JUSTIFICATION:
All warrants, pre -paid checks and payroll checks require Council approval.
BUDGETARY IMPACT:
Adequate funds have been budgeted to cover the subject expenses.
ATTACHMENTS:
1 — Detailed listing of invoices paid and warrant register.
Page 1 of 1
City of San Jacinto
Warrant Register
Date: 02/05/04
Check
Number
Check Date
VendorName
Invoice Number
Description
Account
Number
Transaction
Amount
Check
Total
66364
1/19/04
Arch wireless
M6226464L
M6226464L
M6226464L
Telephone ,010-3100-431.35-16
Telephone
Telephone
050-9000-450.35-16
010-4150-410.35-16
64.71
34.64
21.53
120.88
66365
1/19/04
At & t
STMT 1/14/04
STMT 1/14/04
STMT 1/14/04
STMT 1/14/04
STMT 1/14/04
STMT 1/14/04
STMT 1/14/04
STMT 1/14/04
Telephone
Telephone
Telephone
Telephone
Telephone
Telephone
Telephone
Telephone
010-2500-425.35-16
010-3100-431.35-16
010-7400-425.35-16
010-4150-410.35-16
050-9000-450.35-16
010-2500-425.35-16
025-7252-410.35-16
010-6100-425.35-16
960.51
1,098.59
19.29
86.80
86.80
595.46
23.19
8.17
2,878.81
66366
1/19/04
Calpers
REQUEST 1/15/04
Ret contr 1/8/04 type 3
085-0000-202.21-28
25,764.58
25,764.58
66367
1/19/04
Hartford life insurance companies
REQUEST 1/15/04
Def comp cont grp#109947
085-0000-202.21-29
4,441.00
4,441.00
66368
1/19/04
Icma retirement trust
REQUEST 1/15/04
Def comp contb 1/8/04
085-0000-202.21-29
740.38
740.38
66369
1/19/04
Lincoln life
REQUEST 1/15/04
Def comp contb 1/8/04
085-0000-202.21-29
335.00
335.00
66370
1/19/04
Mulcock, barry
REQUEST 1/19/04
Tuition reimbursement
010-2500-425.31-20
123.08
123.08
66371
1/19/04
Platinium plus for business
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
Greater riv chamber of co
Hot wok - luncheon
Ibm - printer stand
Lake alice trading -lunch
Pride of italy-meeting
Z-best pizza -luncheon
Z-best pizza -luncheon
Wild orchid -flower arange
Best medical supply -kit
Longs -first aid kit
Smart & final - supplies
Appliance showroom
Red barron meals travel e
010-1100-411.31-20
010-1200-412.31-20
010-1400-414.40-45
010-1700-417.30-90
010-1700-417.30-90
010-1700-417.31-20
010-1700-417.31-20
010-2500-425.21-10
010-2500-425.21-10
010-2500-425.21-10
010-2510-425.40-09
010-3100-431.21-19
010-3100-431.21-90
280.00
21.21
489.89
68.36
19.36
29.12
16.73
53.88
10.75
87.29
49.39
455.56
11.00
3,183.85
Panes 1
City of San Jacinto
Warrant Register
Date: 02/05/04
Check
Number
Check Date
VendorName
Invoice Number
Description
Account
Number
Transaction
Amount
Check
Total
66371...
1/19/04...
Platinium plus for business...
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/03
REQUEST 1/19/03
REQUEST 1/19/03
REQUEST 1/19/03
REQUEST 1/19/03
Buger king meals travel e
Red barron meals travel e
Gustav's pub meals travel
One world way parking fee
Alaska airlines travel
Alaska airlines travel
Alaska airlines travel
Graybar-computer supplies
010-3100-431.21-90
010-3100-431.21-90
010-3100-431.21-90
010-3100-431.21-90
010-3100-431.21-90
010-3100-431.21-90
010-3100-431.21-90
050-1400-414.40-45
16.83
14.00
34.94
30.00
567.00
567.00
287.00
74.54
3,183.85...
66373
1/19/04
So. california edison co.
REQUEST 1/19/04
Utilities
050-9000-450.35-40
36,974.03
36,974.03
66374
1/19/04
So. california gas co.
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
REQUEST 1/19/04
Utilities
Utilities
Utilities
Utilities
Utilities
Utilities
Utilities
010-2500-425.35-12
010-2500-425.35-12
010-3100-431.35-12
010-6100-425.35-12
010-7400-425.35-12
010-4150-410.35-12
010-4150-410.35-12
16.91
171.98
144.60
28.42
201.85
47.41
13.62
624.79
66375
1/19/04
Verizon california
REQUEST 1/19/04
Telephone
010-2500-425.35-60
3,525.79
3,525.79
66376
1/15/04
Lancaster inspection services
04-01
Dec 22,03 to jan 09, 04
010-3300-417.10-04
3,078.00
3,078.00
66377
1/23/04
San jacinto unified school
REQUEST 1/21/04
REQUEST 1/21/04
REQUEST 1/21/04
Fy 2002-03 passthrough
Fy 2002-03 passthrough
Fy 2002-03 passthrough
097-0000-239.00-00
097-0000-239.00-00
089-0000-239.00-00
220,720.00
390.00
2,225.49
223,335.49
66378
1/23/04
Riverside, county of
REQUEST 1/23/04
Filing notice of determin
010-1700-417.36-25
128.00
128.00
66379
1/23/04
Lavin, robert a.
REQUEST 1/15/04
Travel & expense
010-4200-410.31-20
227.75
227.75
66380
1/23/04
League of calif. cities
REQUEST 12/23/3
Registration attn:b lavin
010-4200-410.31-20
425.00
425.00
66381
1/23/04
Fess parker double tree
REQUEST 12/23/3
Lodging for conf 3/2-5,04
010-4200-410.31-20
504.00
504.00
66384
1/27/04
Aflac
REQUEST 1/26/04
Aflac ins payment 1/2004
085-0000-202.21-27
2,184.58
2,184.58
66385
1/27/04
Calpers
REQUEST 1/26/04
Pers retire 1/22/04 typ 4
085-0000-202.21-28
23,274.49
23,274.49
66386
1/27/04
Hartford life insurance companies
REQUEST 1/26/04
Grp#109947 period 1/22/04
085-0000-202.21-29
4,441.00
4,441.00
Pane 2
City of San Jacinto
Warrant Register
Date: 02/05/04
Check
Number
Check Date
VendorName
Invoice Number
Description
Account
Number
Transaction
Amount
Check
Total
66387
1/27/04
Icma retirement trust
REQUEST 1/26/04
Def comp period 1/22/04
085-0000-202.21-29
615.38
615.38
66388
1/27/04
Lincoln life
REQUEST 1/26/04
Def comp contr jan 22, 04
085-0000-202.21-29
335.00
335.00
66389
1/27/04
Pre -paid legal services, inc.
REQUEST 1/26/04
Jan 2004 payment
085-0000-202.21-87
254.32
254.32
66390
1/27/04
Ritchie, robert
REQUEST 1/26/04
Subsistence"trafficfeb04
010-3100-431.31-25
80.00
80.00
66391
1/27/04
Riverside county shefiffs dept.
REQUEST 1/26/04
Tuition "traffic collisio
010-3100-431.31-25
222.00
222.00
66392
1/27/04
S.j. police association
REQUEST 1/26/04
Sjpoa dues jan 2004
085-0000-202.21-42
1,425.00
1,425.00
66393
1/27/04
Service employees international
REQUEST 1/26/04
Seiu assoc dues jan 2004
085-0000-202.21-43
585.90
585.90
66394
1/27/04
Staples credit plan
JL13069001
JL13069003
16787
18530
18530
18530
18944
21009
Office supplies
Office supplies
Office supplies
Office supplies
Office supplies
Office supplies
Office supplies
Office supplies
010-1110-411.21-10
010-1110-411.21-10
010-4200-410.21-10
010-1700-417.21-10
010-3300-431.21-10
010-2500-425.21-10
010-3100-431.21-10
010-1200-412.21-10
61.96
15.61
145.45
35.50
45.90
243.51
102.11
50.63
700.67
66395
1/27/04
Tri-lake consultants, inc.
1790
Professional services
065-0000-201.06-47
21,755.65
21,755.65
66396
1/27/04
United way of hemet
REQUEST 1/26/04
Contributions jan 2004
085-0000-202.21-80
130.38
130.38
66399
2/5/04
A-1 lock & key service
29755
29739
29747
Supplies
Supplies
Supplies
010-4150-410.33-50
010-3100-431.33-50
010-3100-431.33-50
4.31
8.62
15.00
27.93
66400
2/5/04
Accela
PA35901
Software
010-3300-431.34-05
1,260.00
1,260.00
66401
2/5/04
Advanced telemetry systems
13002
Fcc lis & utc license
055-4170-450.40-45
575.00
575.00
66402
2/5/04
All ways green
12
Consultation pest control
010-4150-410.21-14
150.00
150.00
66403
2/5/04
Allen tire company
166221
Auto repair
010-7100-410.33-50
106.60
106.60
66404
2/5/04
Arrow printing
3575
3574
3573
3573
Office supplies
Office supplies
Office supplies
Office supplies
010-2500-425.21-10
010-1200-412.21-10
010-1700-417.21-10
010-3300-431.21-10
106.67
82.43
44.44
44.45
957.36
Pane 3
City of San Jacinto
Warrant Register
Date: 02/05/04
Check
Number
Check Date
VendorName
Invoice Number
Description
Account
Number
Transaction
Amount
Check
Total
66404...
2/5/04...
Arrow printing...
,3572
3572
3572
3572
3578
3582
Office supplies
Office supplies
Office supplies
Office supplies
Office supplies
Office supplies
029-8662-417.30-90
010-3300-431.21-10
010-3320-431.21-10
010-4100-410.21-10
010-3300-431.21-10
050-1400-414.21-10
29.50
29.50
29.50
29.49
62.50
498.88
957.36...
66405
2/5/04
At & t
12/22/03 6478
Telephone
010-2500-425.35-16
42.98
42.98
66406
2/5/04
Auto glass pros
1/6/04
Auto repair
010-7100-410.33-50
130.00
130.00
66407
2/5/04
Bio-tox laboratories
11688
11697
Supplies
Supplies
010-3100-431.34-05
010-3100-431.34-05
373.70
149.90
523.60
66408
2/5/04
Blue ribbon plumbing
93051
Services rendered
010-2500-425.33-10
450.00
450.00
66409
2/5/04
C r & r incorporated
4808
Sweeper waste
056-4150-410.35-18
1,957.19
1,957.19
66410
2/5/04
California overnight
4182449
4174786
4174786
4186635
Postage
Postage
Postage
Postage
010-1110-411.21-10
010-3300-431.21-10
010-1700-417.21-10
010-1700-417.21-10
30.44
52.50
32.00
8.00
122.94
66411
2/5/04
Callaway motorsports
99117244
Auto repair
010-3100-431.33-50
115.00
115.00
66412
2/5/04
Ced consolidated electrical
2983-424997
2983-424790
2983-425095
Supplies
Supplies
Supplies
010-7100-410.33-30
025-7260-410.21-30
025-7260-410.21-30
128.63
54.69
37.84
221.16
66413
2/5/04
Comserco
01-041931-000-0
01-041932-000-0
01-041928-000-0
01-041926-000-0
01-041998-000-0
01-042011-000-0
Radio equipment
Radio equipment
Radio equipment
Radio equipment
Supplies
Supplies
010-3100-431.40-45
010-3100-431.40-45
010-3100-431.40-45
010-3100-431.40-45
010-3100-431.33-50
010-3100-431.33-50
9,757.33
9,757.33
9,757.33
9,852.00
226.28
358.81
39,709.08
66414
2/5/04
Comtronix of hemet
40745
Raido equipment
010-3100-431.33-50
122.16
122.16
66415
2/5/04
Cutting edge staffing
15512
15512
Temp employees
Temp employees
010-3300-431.30-90
010-7100-410.10-04
2,658.43
548.28
8,534.23
Panes 4
City of San Jacinto
Warrant Register
Date: 02/05/04
Check
Number
Check Date
VendorName
Invoice Number
Description
Account
Number
Transaction
Amount
Check
Total
66415...
2/5/04...
Cutting edge staffing...
15557
15557
15647
15647
Temp employees
Temp employees
Temp employees
Temp employees
010-3300-431.30-90
010-7100-410.10-04
010-7100-410.10-04
010-3300-431.30-90
2,689.16
548.28
426.44
1,663.64
8,534.23...
66416
2/5/04
D.m.c. tree care
1/05/04
Services rendered
032-7150-410.40-01
1,120.00
1,120.00
66417
2/5/04
E.s. babcock & sons, inc.
AA40138-0278
AA40440-0278
AA40446-0278
AA40783-0278
Analysis
Analysis
Analysis
Analysis
050-9000-450.33-30
050-9000-450.33-30
050-9000-450.33-30
050-9000-450.33-30
48.00
30.00
20.00
60.00
158.00
66418
2/5/04
Eastern municipal water district
1/15/01 1490420
1/15/019199801
1/13/04 9079501
1/13/04 9217802
1/13/04 8500010
01/12/04 437960
1/12/04 9539902
Utilities
Utilities
Utilities
Utilities
Utilities
Utilities
Utilities
025-7250-410.35-10
025-7100-410.35-10
025-7250-410.35-10
025-7250-410.35-10
025-7250-410.35-10
025-7250-410.35-10
025-7250-410.35-10
15.18
139.00
20.13
112.97
17.58
8.37
14.33
327.56
66419
2/5/04
Ewing
4034851
4034852
Supplies
Supplies
010-7100-410.21-80
010-7100-410.33-30
209.04
113.75
322.79
66420
2/5/04
Federal express
1-536-91726
Postage
010-1110-411.21-10
20.54
20.54
66421
2/5/04
Fleet services
PU000000316
PU000000316
PU000000316
PU000000316
PU000000316
PU000000316
PU000000316
PU000000316
PU000000316
November 2003 gasoline
November 2003 gasoline
November 2003 gasoline
November 2003 gasoline
November 2003 gasoline
November 2003 gasoline
November 2003 gasoline
November 2003 gasoline
November 2003 gasoline
010-1200-412.33-50
010-1400-414.21-10
010-3100-431.21-70
010-1700-417.21-70
010-3300-431.21-70
021-4150-410.21-70
010-7100-410.21-70
050-9000-450.21-70
010-3320-431.21-70
37.74
56.52
4,005.96
73.73
31.55
397.42
436.63
888.81
105.11
6,033.47
66422
2/5/04
Golden bell products
11272
Supplies
055-4170-450.33-30
258.60
258.60
Pana 5
City of San Jacinto
Warrant Register
Date: 02/05/04
Check
Number
Check Date
VendorName
Invoice Number
Description
Account
Number
Transaction
Amount
Check
Total
66423
2/5/04
Gosch ford
FOCS291101
Auto repair
010-4150-410.33-50
540.06
540.06
66424
2/5/04
Graves & king Hp
NOVEMBER 30,03
Attorney fees
020-2200-419.30-90
2,110.45
2,110.45
66425
2/5/04
Harbor freight tools
101674
Supplies
010-4150-410.21-80
58.01
58.01
66426
2/5/04
Harding, diane
REQUEST 1/15/04
REQUEST 1/12/04
Reimbursement
Reimbursment
010-3100-431.21-90
010-3100-431.21-90
10.00
102.65
112.65
66427
2/5/04
Hdl software, Ilc
90014
Software
010-1701-417.34-05
2,088.64
2,088.64
66428
2/5/04
Hemet valley pipe & supply
80670
80577
80614
80569
Supplies
Supplies
Supplies
Supplies
010-7100-410.33-30
010-7100-410.33-30
010-7100-410.33-30
010-7100-410.33-30
22.39
5.76
33.50
90.54
152.19
66429
2/5/04
Hemet valley tool & supply
66326
66256
Supplies
Supplies
050-9000-450.21-35
055-4170-450.33-30
12.93
42.02
54.95
66430
2/5/04
Home depot credit services
115933
107194
Supplies
Supplies
010-3300-431.21-10
010-7100-410.33-30
127.91
159.84
287.75
66431
2/5/04
Hubbs stationery
4223
Supplies
010-1400-414.21-10
165.61
165.61
66432
2/5/04
Inland foundation eng. inc.
7825
Professional services
022-4150-410.40-01
542.50
542.50
66433
2/5/04
Inland water works supply co.
133280
133665
Supplies
Supplies
050-9000-450.33-30
050-9000-450.33-30
38.79
220.73
259.52
66434
2/5/04
J & j automotive
18401
Auto repair
010-4200-410.33-50
20.00
20.00
66435
2/5/04
J & m air conditioning
77660
Supplies
010-7400-425.33-10
59.00
59.00
66436
2/5/04
Jesse's auto glass & upholstery
1084
Auto repair
010-3100-431.33-50
225.00
225.00
66437
2/5/04
Kommerstad family trust
1/1/04
1/1/04
1/1/04
Lease rental/equipment
Lease rental/equipment
Lease rental/equipment
050-0000-235.00-00
010-4150-410.60-10
010-4150-410.60-15
6,134.93
8,764.41
1,077.04
15,976.38
66438
2/5/04
La chemcial
268023
268932
Supplies
Supplies
050-9000-450.33-30
050-9000-450.33-30
1,173.64
1,473.67
2,647.31
66439
2/5/04
Lancaster inspection services
04-02
Jan 12,04 to jan 23, 04
010-3300-417.10-04
2,888.00
2,888.00
66440
2/5/04
Long beach uniform co.
563515
Uniform supplies
010-3100-431.21-35
657.22
1,314.44
Pans Fi
City of San Jacinto
Warrant Register
Date: 02/05/04
Check
Number
Check Date
VendorName
Invoice Number
Description
Account
Number
Transaction
Amount
Check
Total
66440...
2/5/04...
Long beach uniform co....
566384
Uniform supplies
010-3100-431.21-35
657.22
1,314.44...
66441
2/5/04
Lsa associates, inc.
54281F
Professional servcies
010-1700-417.30-90
300.00
300.00
66442
2/5/04
Melendez, richard
REQUEST 1/15/04
Mileage/reg reimbursement
010-3100-431.31-25
139.40
139.40
66443
2/5/04
Micro mobile
9227
Supplies
010-4150-410.33-50
67.50
67.50
66444
2/5/04
Mission uniform services, inc.
S 85605
17978880
17977852
S 85604
17979918
17979915
17979916
17980942
17980945
17979917
Uniform supplies
Uniform supplies
Uniform supplies
Uniform supplies
Uniform supplies
Uniform supplies
Uniform supplies
Uniform supplies
Uniform supplies
Uniform supplies
010-7100-410.21-35
010-7100-410.21-35
010-7100-410.21-35
055-4170-450.21-35
010-4150-410.21-35
050-9000-450.21-35
010-4100-410.21-10
050-9000-450.21-35
010-4150-410.21-35
010-7100-410.21-35
44.01
29.16
22.86
6.50
38.07
57.83
6.07
57.83
49.09
24.57
335.99
66445
2/5/04
Moore store, the
P162072-00
Supplies
010-3100-431.21-10
170.07
170.07
66446
2/5/04
Nextel communications
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
010-1200-412.35-17
010-1700-417.35-17
010-1400-414.35-17
010-1700-417.35-17
099-1700-417.35-17
010-3300-431.34-05
010-4150-410.35-16
025-7252-410.35-16
010-4150-410.35-16
010-1400-414.35-17
010-7100-410.35-16
010-3300-431.34-05
010-7100-410.35-16
050-9000-450.35-16
74.12
99.68
70.17
70.17
70.17
81.08
70.17
70.17
43.04
43.04
50.98
74.37
108.08
83.59
1,671.71
Panes 7
City of San Jacinto
Warrant Register
Date: 02/05/04
Check
Number
Check Date
VendorName
Invoice Number
Description
Account
Number
Transaction
Amount
Check
Total
66446...
2/5/04...
Nextel communications...
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
REQUEST 1/14/03
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
Cellular phone
050-9000-450.35-16
010-7100-410.35-17
010-3300-431.35-17
050-9000-450.35-16
010-1110-411.35-17
029-8662-410.35-17
010-2500-425.35-16
050-9000-450.35-16
050-9000-450.35-16
134.46
46.97
68.72
74.12
41.74
72.73
8.03
53.63
162.48
1,671.71...
66448
2/5/04
Overnight industrial
22024
22079
Supplies
Supplies
010-7100-410.33-10
010-7400-425.33-10
294.44
140.61
435.05
66449
2/5/04
Pacific alarm svc., inc.
39624
39624
39624
39624
39624
39629
Alarm fees
Alarm fees
Alarm fees
Alarm fees
Alarm fees
Alarm fees
010-4200-410.34-05
010-7100-410.34-05
050-9000-450.34-05
010-2500-425.34-05
010-6500-425.34-05
010-3100-431.21-19
198.50
16.00
118.50
87.00
38.00
26.00
484.00
66450
2/5/04
Pierce plumbing
30513
30521
30512
30517
Supplies
Supplies
Supplies
Supplies
010-4150-410.33-30
010-7100-410.33-30
050-9000-450.33-30
050-9000-450.33-30
17.07
65.02
63.58
68.43
214.10
66451
2/5/04
Pins & needles embroidery
2497
Uniforms
010-3300-431.21-35
318.94
318.94
66452
2/5/04
Pju telecomm
11207
Servcies rendered
102-1400-500.40-45
412.84
412.84
66453
2/5/04
Portable storage coproration
4534
Storage contanier
102-1400-500.40-45
2,553.25
2,553.25
66454
2/5/04
Press enterprise
666318
665692
680981
Advertisment
Advertisment
Advertisment
096-1700-417.36-25
096-1700-417.36-25
096-1700-417.36-25
371.70
177.00
177.00
725.70
66455
2/5/04
Purchase power
STMT 1/02/04
Postage
010-2500-425.21-10
30.00
30.00
66456
2/5/04
Quality auto parts
D646111
Supplies
010-4150-410.33-50
17.22
298.52
Paae 8
City of San Jacinto
Warrant Register
Date: 02/05/04
Check
Number
Check Date
VendorName
Invoice Number
Description
Account
Number
Transaction
Amount
Check
Total
66456...
2/5/04...
Quality auto parts...
D648144
D649013
D647892
D651677
D649997
D649807
Supplies
Supplies
Supplies
Supplies
Supplies
Supplies
010-4150-410.33-50
010-4150-410.33-50
010-4150-410.33-50
050-9000-450.33-30
055-4170-450.33-50
055-4170-450.33-50
61.46
10.74
34.37
4.84
155.38
14.51
298.52...
66457
2/5/04
Quasttree service
1/15/04
Services rendered
032-7150-410.40-01
3,532.50
3,532.50
66458
2/5/04
Ramona animal shelter, inc.
01/15/04 STMT
12/31/03
Animal intake dec 2003
Animal intake november 03
010-3100-431.34-05
010-3100-431.34-05
3,781.25
3,524.75
7,306.00
66459
2/5/04
Regency lighting
315976
Supplies
025-7260-410.21-30
54.84
54.84
66460
2/5/04
Reliable
CYH41298
YX980900
YXZ98000
YXZ98000
YXZ98000
RNC79300
RNC79300
Office supplies
Office supplies
Office supplies
Office supplies
Office supplies
Office supplies
Office supplies
010-4200-410.21-10
010-4200-410.21-10
010-1110-411.21-10
010-1210-412.21-10
010-1200-412.21-10
010-1400-414.21-10
050-1400-414.21-10
-32.31
44.11
5.73
8.06
60.09
214.06
4.73
304.47
66461
2/5/04
Riverside county sheriffs
SH0000001521
Contract law enforcement
010-3100-431.30-90
4,604.80
4,604.80
66462
2/5/04
Riverside county waste manageme
334864
401598
Street cleaner dump fees
Street cleaner dump fees
010-4150-410.33-30
010-4150-410.33-30
20.00
31.50
51.50
66463
2/5/04
Riverside, county of
3668
Assessor maps •
010-1700-417.21-10
3.00
3.00
66464
2/5/04
Riverside, county of -transportation
TL0000001175
Traffic signal service
010-4150-410.34-05
8,202.00
8,202.00
66465
2/5/04
Rod's automotive performance
131230007
140112003
Auto repair
Auto repair
010-3100-431.33-50
010-3100-431.33-50
516.07
1,141.67
1,657.74
66466
2/5/04
San bernardino police department
REQUEST 1/22/04
Tuition "colt m16/ar15
010-3100-431.31-20
375.00
375.00
66467
2/5/04
Shred it
5082252
Services rendered
010-3100-431.21-10
85.00
85.00
66468
2/5/04
Southern, ken
REQUEST 1/22/04
Subsistence"colt m16/ar15
010-3100-431.31-20
30.00
30.00
66469
2/5/04
Stater bros
1210605
Supplies
096-1700-417.21-10
31.22
54.66
Pane 9
City of San Jacinto
Warrant Register
Date: 02/05/04
Check
Number
Check Date
VendorName
Invoice Number
Description
Account
Number
Transaction
Amount
Check
Total
66469...
2/5/04...
Stater bros...
1210116
Meeting city council
010-1200-412.31-20
23.44
54.66...
66470
2/5/04
Stetson engineers inc.
12202
Professional servcies
050-9000-450.40-01
9,223.54
9,223.54
66471
2/5/04
Stirdivants shoes
544
Boot allowance r. sanchez
010-7100-410.21-35
140.61
140.61
66472
2/5/04
Superior ready mix concrete
1337356
Supplies
010-4150-410.33-30
51.72
51.72
66473
2/5/04
Tire's warehouse of hemet
5211
5181
5182
Auto repair
Auto repair
Auto repair
010-3100-431.33-50
010-3100-431.33-50
010-3100-431.33-50
340.71
255.53
85.18
681.42
66474
2/5/04
Town & country golf cars
6785
Serviced golf cart
050-9000-450.33-50
131.03
131.03
66475
2/5/04
Tri-lake consultants, inc.
1819
1819
1820
1824
1825
1831
1829
1828
1826
1822
1821
1823
1830
1833
1832
Professional services
Professional services
Professional services
Professional services
Professional services
Professional services
Professional services
Professional services
Professional services
Professional services
Professional services
Professional services
Professional services
Professional services
Professional services
021-4150-410.30-90
010-4100-410.30-90
010-1700-417.30-90
010-1700-417.30-90
029-8662-417.30-90
052-9000-450.40-01
022-4150-410.40-01
052-9000-450.40-01
039-4155-410.40-01
054-9000-450.40-01
022-4150-410.40-01
054-9000-450.40-01
022-4150-410.40-01
052-9000-450.40-01
022-4150-410.40-01
2,802.20
2,878.38
7,600.00
1,235.00
5,855.14
380.00
3,085.00
237.50
1,440.00
40.00
162.50
2,162.38
1,652.50
1,235.00
357.50
31,123.10
66477
2/5/04
Underground service alert
03120683
Population fees
050-9000-450.33-30
415.50
415.50
66478
2/5/04
Valley chronicle, the
1522759-001
2521869-001
2521870-001
2522811-001
2521217-001
Xmas tree lighting
Advertisment
Advertisment
Advertisment
Advertisment
010-2510-425.40-09
010-2510-425.40-08
010-2510-425.40-08
010-1100-411.36-10
096-1700-417.36-25
250.00
250.00
250.00
4,063.41
700.00
5,513.41
Pane 10
City of San Jacinto
Warrant Register
Date: 02/05/04
Check
Number
Check Date
VendorName
Invoice Number
Description
Account
Number
Transaction
Amount
Check
Total
66479
2/5/04
Valley diesel
3912
3919
3916
Auto repair
Auto repair
Auto repair
010-4150-410.33-50
010-4150-410.33-50
010-4150-410.33-50
55.00
55.00
55.00
165.00
66480
2/5/04
Valley foreign auto body
0337
Auto repair
010-3100-431.33-50
403.00
403.00
66481
2/5/04
Valley service connection
1775
1775
Main street clean up
City hall/vir lee clean
010-7100-410.34-05
010-2500-425.33-10
880.00
400.00
1,280.00
66482
2/5/04
Valley steel and welding
9824
Supplies
010-4150-410.33-50
128.70
128.70
66483
2/5/04
Vulcan materials company
193310
194776
195851
Supplies
Supplies
Supplies
010-4150-410.33-30
010-4150-410.33-30
050-9000-450.33-30
177.63
118.57
189.19
485.39
66484
2/5/04
West group
894954
12/31/03 STMT
Subscription
Subscription
010-3300-431.21-15
010-3300-431.21-15
127.00
85.00
212.00
66485
2/5/04
Western highway products
355252
Supplies
010-3100-431.21-90
60.31
60.31
66486
2/5/04
Wetworks pool care
STMT 01/01/04
04100101
Monthly services dec 2003
Statement dec 2003
050-9000-450.33-30
010-8400-425.33-10
949.31
788.87
1,738.18
66487
2/5/04
Williams, cecelia
REQUEST 1/19/04
Reimb refuse servcie
059-0000-308.08-68
30.74
30.74
66488
2/5/04
Xerox corporation
99967291
99755335
99556598
99755343
99755338
000061594
Lease on copier
Lease on copier
Lease on copiers
Lease on copier
Lease on copier
Lease on copier
010-4200-410.34-05
010-4200-410.34-05
010-2500-425.34-05
010-3100-431.34-05
010-3100-431.34-05
010-3100-431.34-05
221.48
174.56
383.78
365.48
180.91
557.24
1,883.45
66489
2/5/04
24 hour fire protection, inc.
103119
Services rendered
010-7400-425.34-05
45.00
45.00
Total Checks 543,294.13
Pane 11
5.�
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
JANUARY 22, 2004, 7:00 p.m.
San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room
2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California
1. ORGANIZATION
1.1 Call to Order
Mayor Jim Ayres called the Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City
Council to order at 7:07 p.m.
Prior to opening the meeting Mayor Ayres noted that public comments
regarding 1.5.3 would be heard under 2.0 Public Comments section.
1.2 Roll Call
Present: Jim Ayres, Chris Carlson-Buydos, Ken Shaw, Dale
Stubblefield
Absent: Jim Conner
1.3 Invocation — Rev. Randy Leeper, Faith Tabernacle, San Jacinto
Rev. Leeper gave the invocation.
1.4 Pledge of Allegiance
Council Member Stubblefield led the Pledge of Allegiance.
1.5 Special Presentations
Because of the travel time Mayor Ayres noted Terri Neuswander,
representing the Riverside County Fair and National Date Festival, would
be taken out of order. Following introductions by Ms Neuswander, Queen
Scheherazade and her court invited the City Council and those present to
the event February 13-22, 2004.
1.5.4 Business Spotlight of the Month / L.O. Lynch, Inc. accepting Emil
Worm and Ken Swarthout / Economic Development Specialist
Randy Williams, Economic Development Specialist, commented
the first spotlight of 2004 was L.O. Lynch, Inc., originally known as
L.L. Lynch. It is the largest pump company in the valley with 20
employees. Following many interesting facts about the company,
City Council Minutes
January 22, 2004
Page 2 of 13
Emil Worm and Ken Swarthout accepted the plaque from Mayor
Ayres.
1.5.1 American Cancer Society "Relay for Life" presentation / Anna
Martin, Volunteer Chairperson
Anna Martin informed the Council the "Relay for Life's" goal is to
raise $100,000 this year for the American Cancer Society. Ms
Martin then introduced three of the young women of the 19
participants in the youth team. Ms. Martin noted it is a 24 hour
event. Mayor Ayres commented that he would be organizing a
team from the City.
1.5.2 Q-Star Technology / Public Safety Sub Committee
Mayor Ayres noted that the Public Safety Sub Committee had
reviewed a similar presentation and thought it would be beneficial
for the Council to also see it.
Carlita Mead explained that the camera is a vandalism deterrent
mechanism. It is operated with a remote on the ground, including
battery and film check. The camera is able to pick a license plate
number at 100 ft. in the dark with no lights.
Ms Meade further noted that it runs on five batteries, it tends to be
bullet proof, is typically mounted on a 16' foot pole, and nationally
used for catching illegal dumpers. She noted the cities using it to
assist in the prosecution of law breakers.
Ms Meade offered to loan a couple of units for the City to test at no
risk. Mayor Ayres advised Ms Meade that the City Manager would
be in touch to make the necessary arrangements.
1.5.3 Overview Sheriff's Department Services / Sheriff Bob Doyle and
staff's presentation
Assistant Sheriff Gayle Janes explained he is responsible for field
operations and was present to explain how contract services work.
The Sheriff's department is preparing a proposal to provide local
law enforcement within San Jacinto City limits. Said proposal will
be delivered to the City Manager on February 3, 2004. Sheriff
Janis then introduced the officers present from the Sheriff's
Department. He noted some of the career development for officers
that had left city departments to begin working with the Sheriff's
office when their cities no longer provided local (city) police
protection.
City Council Minutes
January 22, 2004
Page 3 of 13
Sheriff Janes than gave a PowerPoint presentation, which included,
the present organizational chart, the history of the contract law
enforcement, the 12 cities contracted with the Sheriffs Department:
Moreno Valley, Norco, Pal Desert, Coachella, Calimesa, Lake
Elsinore, La Quinta, Perris, Canyon Lake, Temecula, Indian Wells,
and Rancho Mirage; noting that is exactly half the cities in Riverside
County. The City can determine the level of service and the cost is
determined by the service level provided.
More highlights the Sheriff's Department handles: all the human
resource services, including employee training, labor negotiations,
benefits, discipline, grievances personal injury, wrongful death, and
employee lawsuits.
The logistics of other items covered include radio and dispatch,
equipment, and fleet services. They have specialized services
including SWAT, hazardous materials, forensic science, canine
program, aviation, special investigation, and central homicide units.
The City would only pay for overtime to utilize these special teams.
Other communities retained their community involvement in
partnership with the Sheriffs Department: the local department
could keep their patch but would have to switch to the green and
tan uniform; citizen supported volunteer programs, reserve
deputies, search and rescue, chaplin, citizens on patrol, etc.
Sheriff Janes noted that to keep their cost down, they would be
offering a standard five year contract with an automatic renewal
provision. There is a 12 month termination provision for either
party. The cost of the contract is based on full cost recovery: the
City only pays what it costs. The cost recovery is analyzed
annually and is based on personnel, mileage, and facility.
When deputy cost is reviewed it includes salary, benefits,
compensation, supervision cost, station clerical support,
administrative investigative, administration and media information
and other supports. Support costs include dispatch, finance,
accounting, informational technology, etc. Community based
programs can be as much or as little as the City wants.
Mayor Ayres noted that specific questions could be answered
under public comments, as the Sheriff's Department staff had
offered to answer questions. The City Council will take public
testimony for 30 days. He noted that response time is a frequently
asked question. Sheriff Janes noted that it depends on how many
officers the City pays for. It could be better or worse than it is
currently. If the same number of cars is kept, then it will remain the
same.
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
City Council Minutes
January 22, 2004
Page 4 of 13
Beverly Griggs, 298 S Jordan, San Jacinto, commented her family has been in
San Jacinto since 1915. According to Ms Griggs, there has always been a
dispute between the City and the Police Department. She expressed concern
about the response time if the switch was made to the Sheriff's Department. She
noted that her friends in Perris and Val Vista have had slow response from the
Sheriffs Department. She encouraged the Council to keep the police coverage
local and the police department should be appreciated and acknowledged for
what they do.
Moreen Williamson, 401 West Main Street, San Jacinto, presented a petition of a
consensus of those that would like to keep the police department local. There
were initially 804 signatures; approximately 100 of the signatures were stolen
from on of the locations gathering signatures.
Dr. Janice Hickerson, 1151 Reinhart, San Jacinto, commented she has lived in
San Jacinto for the past nine years. She heard the contract with the Sheriff's
Department was a "done deal" and that it was going to be identical to Temecula's
contract. Dr. Hickerson requested to know if there was a written or verbal
contract. The Sheriffs office employee was confident the contract does exist.
Mayor Ayres responded there is no contract, verbal or written. There will not be
one until there is a public vote. Sheriff Janis responded, and confirmed the
Mayor's comment — there is no contract. If she wants to give him the name, he
will follow up.
3. PUBLIC HEARING
None
4. CITY DEPARTMENTS
4.1 Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (JPA) creating the Western
Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (FCA) for the
Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation
Plan (MSHCP) Approve / Community Development Director
Community Development Director Tim Hults reviewed the formation of the
JPA for the MSHCP: This is the final step to begin implementation of the
MSHCP. The two items of concerns for the Council were how the
leadership would be selected and the indemnification for the City. The
WRCOG executive committee approved the JPA, noting the JPA will
select their own executive director and the indemnification provision is
included. Staff recommends approval and selection of JPA
representative.
City Council Minutes
January 22, 2004
Page 5 of 13
Vice Mayor Carlson-Buydos questioned if the County was taking the lead
for the first three years. Director Hults responded that is in place, as they
are the only ones with sufficient technical staff to do the job at this time.
Council Member Stubblefield commented he is on the FCA Board, as it is
the same as the WRCOG. The first meeting of the JPA is scheduled for
February 1, 2004 at 4:00 p.m.
M/S/C (Ayres / Shaw) moved to approve Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement
(JPA) creating the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation
Authority (FCA) for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species
Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Motion carried 4/0.
Ayes: Carlson-Buydos, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres
Nays: None
Absent: Conner
Abstain: None
4.2 Request to Initiate Zoning Ordinance Amendment (Burn Policy) /
Discuss and direct staff / Community Development Director
Director Hults reviewed the current Burn Policy and why it was adopted:
Non -conforming uses, i.e. a house in a commercial zone may stay unless
it suffers more than a 50% burn; then it can't be rebuilt. There are specific
limitations on non -conforming structures if damaged to re-establish the
house. Because lenders are aware of this rule they won't finance or allow
a mortgage on the property. It has caused a hardship on one family and
their real estate agent continues to bring this item before the Planning
Commission and Council. Planning Commission opted to not initiate the
change as they believe the regulation to be valuable and should stay as it
is.
Joan Berggren, 272 Grand Army Avenue, San Jacinto, noted that she was
not speaking specifically for Mr. Alexandru (Adrian Alexandru) but in
general. The policy was adopted 20 years ago without sufficient notice or
public input (the applicable rules were followed at the time of adoption).
Ms Berggren suggested a policy like Long Beach, as they rescinded a
similar policy. What she was able to find out was that the policy hadn't
been helpful. Ms Berggren then read a section of Government Code as it
applies to duplexes, as she believes the City's regulation takes away an
individual's rights.
Vice Mayor Carlson-Buydos questioned how many situations were there
that would or could be caught in these transitional land uses (houses in
City Council Minutes
January 22, 2004
Page 6 of 13
commercial or industrial areas). Director Hults guessed about 12,
commenting that most are on Seventh Street, Eighth Street, and State
Street.
Vice Mayor Carlson-Buydos commented that she believes it is an
important tool. She questioned what Hemet's tool is for similar situations;
what predicament would it place the City in if they changed to allow
replacement only — no expansion; and if it would be highly detrimental to
redevelopment.
Director Hults noted that the language in this particular regulation is
exactly the same as it is in Hemet. He was informed that a Hemet staff
person created a policy that was in conflict with their City Ordinance. That
person is no longer there. Attorney Ballinger concurred that was correct.
Attorney Ballinger than reviewed the City's regulation.
Mayor Ayres questioned how to get to a place where this owner could sell
his house. Attorney Ballinger commented that would be a Council policy
decision.
Vice Mayor Carlson-Buydos questioned what other cities besides Hemet
do in these situations. Attorney Ballinger remarked that it is a good tool
but how often it is used is unknown. He believes the City should not
relinquish the tool. Vice Mayor Carlson-Buydos noted that she would be
willing to look at single family but not multifamily and would like to know
the areas that would be relinquished.
City Council consensus was to bring it back in 30 days and propose a
hybrid, if that is possible.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
5.1.1 Warrant Register for Warrants, Prepaid Checks, and Payroll Checks
Period Ending 01/22/04 / Approve / Finance Director
5.1.2 January 8, 2004 Regular Meeting Minutes / Approve / City Clerk
5.1.3 Treasurer's Report November 2003 / Approve / Finance Director
5.1.4 Ordinance No. 04-01 / An Ordinance Approving Planning Commission's
Change of Zone 3-03, Tract 31293, Re -Zoning certain Properties /
Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance 04-01 and by further
motion read by title only:
An Ordinance Approving Change of Zone 3-03, Re -
Zoning certain Properties Located Approximately 535 feet
North of Cottonwood Avenue on the East Side of the Lyon
City Council Minutes
January 22, 2004
Page 7 of 13
Avenue from Residential Agriculture Accessory Business
(RAAB) to R-1 (One -Family Residential)
/ Community Development Director
5.1.5 Ordinance No. 04-02 / An Ordinance Approving Planning Commission's
Change of Zone 4-03 with vesting Tentative Tract 31384, Re -Zoning
certain Properties / Approve second reading and Adopt Ordinance 04-02
and by further motion read by title only:
An Ordinance Approving Change of Zone 4-03, Re -
Zoning 26.6 gross acres on the easterly side of Lyon
Avenue, approximately 880 yards north of Cottonwood
Avenue and south of De Anza Drive from Residential
Agricultural Accessory Business (RAAB) to One Family
Residential (R-1)
/ Community Development Director
5.1.6 Save America's Treasures Grant — Estudillo Mansion / Approve /
Community Development Director
5.1.7 Rancho San Jacinto CFD No. 2 Landscape Improvements /
Approve / Public Works Superintendent
5.1.8 Household Hazardous Waste Mobile Collections Program /
Approve agreement with Riverside County Health Services
Agency and Authorize City Manager to execute agreement /
Public Works Superintendent
5.1.9 City Landscape Maintenance reductions proposal for Fiscal Year
2003/2004 third and fourth quarters / Approve / Public Works
Superintendent
5.2.0 Facade Enhancement Loan Program for the Downtown Zone /
Approve / Community Development Director
5.2.1 Sewer Negotiations / Approve / Receive and File / City Manager
5.2.2 Sixth Street & Mistletoe Avenue Water Line Project / Award
Public Works Contract Project No. 03-052 to Genesis
Construction Company of Hemet for the sum of $386,850.00 plus
15% contingency, Authorize City Clerk to reject all other bids
received and Authorize Mayor to execute contract / City Engineer
5.2.3 Tract 30813-1 — Offsite Drainage Easement (West of Kirby
Avenue and North of Cottonwood Avenue) / Accept / City
Engineer
City Council Minutes
January 22, 2004
Page 8 of 13
5.2.4 Resolution No. 2509 / A Resolution requesting federal assistance
in the construction of the San Jacinto River Levee Expansion /
Approve and Authorize The Valley Group to deliver said
resolution and support letters to our federal representatives
Mayor Ayres pulled 5.1.6, 5.1.7, 5.1.9, 5.2.0, 5.2.2, and 5.2.4.
Vice Mayor Carlson-Buydos pulled 5.2.1
M/S/C (Carlson-Buydos / Stubblefield) moved to approve the balance of
the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried 4/0.
Ayes: Carlson-Buydos, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres
Nays: None
Absent: Conner
Abstain: None
5.1.6 Save America's Treasures Grant — Estudillo Mansion /
Approve / Community Development Director
Director Hults reviewed the project information. He noted the list
is not prioritized. The grantor just wants a list of what exactly the
grant pays for. All seven items on the list are anticipated to be
paid for. Once this document is submitted then an
implementation agreement will need to be signed by the Mayor. If
the City accepts this under the National Park Service then the
other grants received are the match and they will have to be
reviewed by the National Park Service. He further informed
Council he will include the bid documents and hopefully get the
authorization to proceed. This process has put the interior grant
on hold. The received grant in jeopardy is the EMWD's.
However, he is hopeful to obtain an extension.
M/S/C (Carlson-Buydos / Ayres) moved to approve the Save America's
Treasurers Grant regarding the Estudillo Mansion. Motion
carried 4/0.
Ayes: Carlson-Buydos, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres
Nays: None
Absent: Conner
Abstain: None
5.1.7 Rancho San Jacinto CFD No. 2 Landscape Improvements /
Approve / Public Works Superintendent
Mayor Ayres noted he would like to have the timeline. He thanked the
subcommittee for there commitment to bring this forward. Public Works
Superintendent Bob Lavin noted there has to be an architect attached to
the project before it can go out to bid. The Council will see the
City Council Minutes
January 22, 2004
Page 9 of 13
specifications and have to approve the bid specifications and will also
approve the bid award.
Vice Mayor Carlson-Buydos commented the improvements and
enhancements go back into Rancho San Jacinto, as it is their
money and added a hardscape suggestion.
M/S/C (Ayres / Carlson-Buydos) moved to approve the proposed Rancho
San Jacinto CFD No. 2 Landscape Improvements Motion
carried 4/0.
Ayes: Carlson-Buydos, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres
Nays: None
Absent: Conner
Abstain: None
5.1.9 City Landscape Maintenance (LLPD No. 1) reductions
proposal for Fiscal Year 2003/2004 third and fourth quarters /
Approve / Public Works Superintendent
Superintendent Lavin commented the evaluation was based on
the maintenance currently done in LLPD No. 1. The savings is
about $12,000 per month for an expected annual savings of
$100,000 to $150,000.
Vice Mayor noted that LLPD No. 2 is not impacted and the area
will be maintained just adjusted appropriately for each season.
She asked for a friendly amendment to the approval that quarterly
reports be done back to Council on the impact. Mayor Ayres
thanked Superintendent Lavin and Parks Foreman Ray Sanchez
for their work to save the City money.
M/S/C (Carlson-Buydos / Ayres) moved to approve the LLPD No.
landscape reductions for Fiscal Year 2003/2004 3`d and 4th
quarters and to report back to Council quarterly. Motion
carried 4/0.
Ayes: Carlson-Buydos, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres
Nays: None
Absent: Conner
Abstain: None
5.2.0 Fagade Enhancement Loan Program for the Downtown Zone
/ Approve / Community Development Director
City Council Minutes
January 22, 2004
Page 10 of 13
Mayor Ayres expressed concern about little or no interest shown
in the past. He suggested a surgical mailing, as it is a larger area
than the stores on Main Street.
Attorney Ballinger noted this is a Redevelopment Agency issue
and should be on their calendar. Council consensus moved it to
the RDA Agenda following these consent calendar items.
5.2.1 Sewer Negotiations / Approve / Receive and File / City
Manager
Vice Mayor Carlson-Buydos requested this be deferred another
meeting because of other litigation and negotiations.
Council consensus- - concurred to completely remove it from
tonight's Council agenda.
5.2.2 Sixth Street & Mistletoe Avenue Water Line Project / Award
Public Works Contract Project No. 03-052 to Genesis
Construction Company of Hemet for the sum of $386,850.00
plus 15% contingency, Authorize City Clerk to reject all other
bids received and Authorize Mayor to execute contract / City
Engineer
City Engineer Habib Motlagh noted that the construction is
scheduled to start the first week of March. The neighborhood will
be noticed adequately.
M/S/C (Ayres / Carlson-Buydos) moved to approve the Sixth Street &
Mistletoe Avenue Walter Line Project, awarding the Public
Works Contract Project No. 03-052 to Genesis Construction
Company of Hemet for $386,850 plus 15% contingency; and
authorized City Clerk to reject all other bids Motion carried
4/0.
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Abstain:
Carlson-Buydos, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres
None
Conner
None
5.2.4 Resolution No. 2509 / A Resolution requesting federal assistance in
the construction of the San Jacinto River Levee Expansion / Approve
and Authorize The Valley Group to deliver said resolution and
support letters to our federal representatives
Mayor Ayres noted letters of support are needed from surrounding
communities. He would like to take them with him when he goes to
Washington, D.C. on March 6, 2004.
City Council Minutes
January 22, 2004
Page 11 of 13
Letters of support have been received from Perris and Canyon Lake. He
directed the City Manager to input from Lake Elsinore. Valley Group is
going to Washington in February and they are willing to lobby for support,
too.
M/S/C (Ayres / Carlson-Buydos) moved to Resolution No. 2509 / A Resolution
requesting federal assistance in the construction of the San Jacinto
River Levee Expansion; and further moved the Valley Group to
deliver resolution and letters of support to federal legislators Motion
carried 4/0
Ayes: Carlson-Buydos, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres
Nays: None
Absent: Conner
Abstain: None
Mayor Ayres recessed the meeting at 8:27 p.m. and then reconvened it at 8:57 p.m.
6.0 MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS
6.1 Committee and/or Agency Agendas / Receive and File / City Clerk
6.2 Proposed joint meeting between City Council and the San Jacinto
Unified School District Board / Request to set meeting date and
agenda items / Mayor Ayres
Mayor Ayres informed Council he and the City Manager had met with the
San Jacinto Unified School District Board (SJUSD). There are several
items their board needs to discuss with the whole Council. February 12,
2004 is a holiday for some but thought it might be a good joint meeting
night. Council concurred. City Manager Cosentini will confirm with Dr.
Damian for 7:00 p.m. in the room across from the regular meeting or at the
Community Center.
SJUSD Board President Megan Cope was present. Ms Cope address the
Council briefly on:
1) Operation Clean Sweep — a ticket equivalent to a traffic citation
can be issued to students for things like graffiti. It is to make students
accountable for their actions. Council consensus is needed to
implement
2) Each needs to review the other's General Plan. Discussion of where
schools are being designated would be helpful.
3) The community is involved in the schools. It shows, including test
scores are up.
City Council Minutes
January 22, 2004
Page 12 of 13
Council Reports
Council Member Shaw reported on the last meeting of the Consortium of Care.
The press has had several articles on the homeless condition. Social Services is
going to do another survey. He noted the problem is delicate and not sure
everyone is going to be happy with the outcome.
Council Member Stubblefield noted WRCOG was dark and the next meeting on
February 2nd will be followed by the first JPA. The water committee met and
the water subcommittee will be meeting shortly to bring back recommendations.
Vice Mayor Carlson-Buydos commented VEDC met on 1/21/04. The draft
strategic plan has been received and she believes VEDC is moving towards what
it needs to be doing. On 2/11/04 is VEDC's General Membership meeting at the
Hemet Library. Dinner is served at 5:30. She would like to see the full council
there.
Mayor Ayres noted the passing of the oldest San Jacinto resident. Roy Waters
missed his 100th birthday by a few months: He was one of the Grand Marshals
at the 2003 4th of July Parade. Also, the president of the American Legion Post
848 and long time resident, Bob Moffat, passed away this past week. Services
will be at the McWayne Funeral Home on Saturday. Anyone wishing to
contribute to sending flowers, please see the Mayor after the meeting.
Mayor Ayres recessed the Regular meeting to open the Redevelopment Agency
meeting at 9:13 p.m. Mayor Ayres reconvened the regular meeting at 9:16 and noted
following a short recess would go directly into closed session.
7. CLOSED SESSION
7.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford
Employee Organization: Police Officers Association
No reportable action.
7.2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford
Employee Organization: Sergeants Association
No reportable action.
City Council Minutes
January 22, 2004
Page 13 of 13
7.3 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency designated representative: City Attorney
Unrepresented Employee: City Manager
No reportable action.
7.4 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Subdivision (b) of
Section 54956.9: One (1) or more cases
No reportable action.
8. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business before the Council, and followed by the Council's acclimation,
Mayor Ayres adjourned the meeting at 10:10 p.m.
City of San Jacinto
by Jim Ayres, Mayor
ATTEST:
Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk
AGENDA ITEM 5 3
February 10, 2004
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Bernie Simon Finance Director
Jack Templeton, Accountant 0
SUBJECT: Treasurer's Report at December 31, 2003
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and File Treasurer's Report for December 31, 2003.
BACKGROUND:
Total Cash and City Investments increased 0.01% during the month. This
includes cash, cash in bank and cash with trustee. At December 31, 2003,
$561,546 remains from the original $1.3 Million Loan from RCTC in 1998.
Some of the large expenditures during the month included items such as
$203,305 to Riverside County Fire Department for Fire Contract, $134,496 to
Genesis Construction for De Anza Lift Station And Water Main Project, $121,618
to Best, Best & Krieger for legal fees, $91,939 to Ramsey Street Ford for Police
Vehicles, $80,050 to Albert A. Webb Associates for San Jacinto River Levee
Preliminary Engineering and Environmental Project, $66,875 to Esgil Corporation
for Plan Check Fees, $55,001 to Perma for Workers Compensation Premiums,
$41,944 to Tri-Lake Consultants for Professional Fees and $40,000 to Western
Pacific Housing to refund overpaid annexation fees for Police/Fire CFD 2003.
Disbursements were made from trustee funds relating to principal and interest
debt service requirements for Tax Allocation Bonds of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of San Jacinto of $199,924.
The Treasurers' report is a "snapshot" report of our cash position on the last day
of the month in all of our accounts.
Page 1 of 1
Page 1
INVESTMENT
TYPE
INSTITUTION
SERIAL 6
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
TREASURERS REPORT
FOR THE MONTH ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2003
INTEREST
RATE
11/30/03
PURCHASE MATURITY PREY. MONTH
YIELD DATE DATE BALANCE
12/31/03
CURRENT
BALANCE
% change
from prior
month
12/31/03 COMPUTED
MARKET ACCRUED
VALUE INTEREST
STATE POOL
Money Market
DEMAND Account
PAYROLL Account
IMPREST Account
L.A.I.F.
Bank of Hemet
Bank of Hemet
Bank of Hemet
' Bank of Hemet
Cash on Hand
TOTAL CITY INVESTMENTS & FUNDS
CFD NO 7
Mutual Fund
Mutual Fund
Mutual Fund
Corporate Obligations
Mutual Fund
Mutual Fund
Mutual Fund
Trusted
Union Bnk
Union Bnk
Union Bnk
Union Bnk
Union Bnk
Union Bnk
Union Bnk
1.546 %
1.240%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
0.000%
1.546 %
1.240%
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
RFSTRICTED CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT (BOND FUNDS)
Blkrock Prov. T-Fund
Blkrock Prov. T-Fund
Blkrock Prov. T-Fund
Bayerische Lankbk GIC
Blkrock Prov. T-Fund
Blkrock Prov. T-Fund
Blkrock Prov. T-Fund
TOTAL CFD NO 2
6711695201
6711695202
6711695204
6711695204
6711695205
6711695301
6711695501
CFD NO 7002-1
Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund 67116952006
TOTAL CFD NO 2 REFINANCE
RDA SAN JACINTO TAX ALLOCATION BONDS
Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 94-1
U.S. Treasury Notes Union Bnk Alamo Capital
Money Market Union Bnk Alamo Capital
Cash Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund
TOTAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 94-1
1997 WATER IMPROV.
Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund
Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund
TOTAL 1997 WATER IMPROV.
7002 WATFR REVENUE BONDS
Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund
SOBORA RDA BONDS
Mutual Fund Union Bnk Blkrock Prov. T-Fund
11CTC LOAN
Money Market USB US Bank
0.790%
0.790%
0.790%
4.050%
0.790%
0.790%
0.790%
0.790%
0.790%
0.790%
4.050%
0.790%
0.790%
0.790%
Various
11/01/01
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
Various
10/10/02
Various
Various
Various
0.790% 0.790% Various
7-15639 0.790% 0.790% Various
678544857
678544857
7-15777
4.750%
0.400%
0.790%
4.760%
0.400%
0.790%
Various
Various
Various
7-15980 0.790% 0.790% Various
7-15980-06 0.790% 0.790% Various
6-711682901 0.790% 0.790% Various
7-16274 0.790% 0.790% Various
96-444672 0.570% 0.670% Various
Open
Open
Open
Open
' Open
n/a
Open
Open
Open
09/01/14
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
02/15/04
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
$13,764,584
$400,915
$358,627
$30,570
$1,433
$600
$13,164,584
$705,835
$879,272
45.015
$1,433
$600
-4.36%
76.06%
146.18%
-83.60%
0.00%
0.00%
$13,218,648
$705,835
$879,272
$5,015
$1,433
4600
$54,064
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
$14,556,729 $14,756,739
1.37% $14,810,803
$54,064
41,395
40
$8
4748,800
$20,020
$40,688
$26,025
8836,936
$827,116
$827,116
$533,500
41,396 0.07%
40 0.00%
48 0.00%
$748,800 0.00%
420,030 0.05%
$40,708 0.05%
$26,038 0.05%
$836,980 0.01%
$827,528 0.05%
4827,528 0.05%
$333,760 -37.44%
41,396
$0
$8
$748,800
420,030
$40,708
$26,038
$836,980
$827,628
4827,528
$333,760
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
$50,391
$3,861
$0
$54,252
$50,219
$3,863
$0
-0.34%
0.05%
0.00%
$54,082 -0.31 %
$50,219
$3,863
80
$54,082
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
$1,360,870 $1,351,543
$204,140
0.05%
$204,242 0.06%
$1,555,010 $1,655,785
$15
0.05%
$15 0.00%
$1,361,543
$204,242
$1,555,785
815
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
490,090
$90,135 0.05%
$90,135
n/a
4561,341
$561,546 0.04%
$561,546
Prepared By: Jack Templeton, CA - 01/16/04
Page 2
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
TREASURERS REPORT
FOR THE MONTH ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2003
11/30/03 12/31/03 % change 12/31/03 COMPUTED
INVESTMENT INSTITUTION INTEREST PURCHASE MATURITY PREY. MONTH CURRENT from prior MARKET ACCRUED
TYPE SERIAL # RATE YIELD DATE DATE BALANCE BALANCE month VALUE INTEREST
TOTAL CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
I CERTIFY THAT THESE INVESTMENTS COMPLY WITH ALL STATE LAWS PERTAINING TO THE INVESTMENT OF LOCAL AGENCY FUNDS AND
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO'S INVESTMENT POLICIES. CITY OF SAN JACINTO MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SIX MONTH CASH FLOW REQUIREMENTS
AS PER GOVERNMENT CODE 536461b1131.
AMES W. POTTS, TREASURER
City Of San Jacinto
84,468,260 84,269,831 -4.45%
94,259,831 n/a
819,014,989 819,016,570 0.01% 819,070,634 854,064
Prepared By: Jack Templeton, CA - 01 /16/04
AGENDA ITEM 5-4-
February 5, 2004
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Lake Park Drive Well and Main Street Waterline (Project No. 02-
022)
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize bid advertisement for construction of Lake Park Drive Well and Main
Street Waterline.
BACKGROUND:
Stetson Engineering is under contract to design the plans and specifications for
construction of Lake Park Drive Well proposed at the northeast corner of
Ramona Expressway and Lake Park Drive within the City's property immediately
adjacent to the road. This property is the result of right-of-way exchange
between EMWD and the City of San Jacinto due to construction of Lake Park
Drive Bridge. EMWD will have to record the necessary documents to transfer the
property to the City; their staff has been in communication with City Manager and
myself indicating their concurrence with the well location.
The extension of waterline along Main Street from Camino Los Banos to the well
was anticipated to be included in the Main Street Pavement Rehabilitation
project. However, recently staff was directed to include the waterline with the
well project. To merge the waterline and the well project, we respectfully request
that the Council authorize bid advertisement after completion of final design and
specifications expected within two to three weeks.
Appro
City Manager:
Finance Director:
Page 1 of 2
According to the attached memorandum from Finance Director dated January 13,
2004, $1,871,485.00 is currently available in combined water funds. On January
22, 2004, City Council authorized construction of Sixth Street and Mistletoe
Avenue Waterline Replacement and Upgrades at an estimated cost of
$430,000.00, leaving a balance of approximately $1,330,000.00. Stetson
Engineer's estimate for the well was $920,000.00, the estimated cost for Main
Street Waterline is $400,000.00.
JUSTIFICATION:
Ensure availability of reliable source of water to the residents within the City's
Water Service Area at a reasonable cost.
BUDGETARY IMPACT:
Adequate funds are available from 1997 San Jacinto Water Improvement Bonds
and 2002 Water Revenue Refunding Bonds, as well as water capital
improvement fund (Project No. 02-022).
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Memorandum from Finance Director dated January 13, 2004
Page 2 of 2
MEMORANDUM
January 13, 2004
To: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer
From: Bernie Simon, Finance Director
Subj: Capital Funds Available for Water Improvement Projects
Bond Funds Available:
1997 SJ Water Improvement Bonds
Project Account — 700015980-05 11/30/03 $1,350,780
2002 Water Revenue Refunding Bonds
(Bal. of 1993 COP Project Funds)
Project Account — 700015980-06 11/30/03 204,035
Total Bond Funds 11/30/03 $ $1,554,815
Water Capital Improvement Fund
(051) Capital Improvement Fees & Interest
Available Through 12/31/03 $ 415.170
Total Available Capital Improvement prior to O/H $1,969,985
5.0% Overhead Charge Estimated (98,500)
Total Available $$$$$$$— 1,871,485
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
•
AGENDA ITEM 5. 5
February 5, 2004
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members,, of the City Council
FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Enginee
SUBJECT: Final Tract Maps 30462 and 30462-1 — Greystone Homes, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION:
By motion, 1) Approve Final Tract Maps 30462 and 30462-1; 2) and authorize the
City Manager to execute the subdivision agreement.
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Tract Map 30462 is a 212 single family lot subdivision on 60.15 acres,
located at the southeast corner for Sanderson Avenue and Seventh Street. This
subdivision is being recorded in two final tract maps; Final Tract Map 30462
encompasses 109-lots, and Final Tract Map 30462-1 encompasses 103-lots.
The improvement plans associated with this subdivision have been approved and
construction of infrastructure is under way. Adequate bonds, including
landscaping improvements, have been provided to ensure installation of the
required improvements. Additionally, on October 2, 2003, the entire area of Tract
30462 was annexed to the City's Landscaping, Lighting, and Park District No. 2,
and on November 6, 2003, this project was annexed to the City's Community
Facilities District 2003-01 for Police and Fire Protection.
JUSTIFICATION
Final Tract Maps 30462 and 30462-1 have substantially complied with the
requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and the City of San Jacinto Subdivision
Ordinance. Appropriate securities to complete the offsite improvements have
been posted with the City and are part of the subdivision agreement.
App
City Manager:
Finance Director:
Page 1 of 2
BUDGETARY IMPACT
All consulting fees associated with the review of final map and improvement
plans has been paid in full by developer.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Final Maps 30462 and 30462-1
Page 2 of 2
OWNER'S STATEYEYi
WE 11131EBY STATE THAT NE ARE THE OWNERS OF TIE (.AND INCLUDED EMIR THE SI6ONSON
SHOWN HEREON THAT WE ARE THE ONLY PERSONS THOSE CO19NT I NECESSARY TO PASS A
CLEAR TITLE 1O SAD LAND: THAT WE CONSENT 10 THE MATONO AND IECODO1O OF THIS
SUBOINSION MAR AS SHOW WTI THE ODIRICIIVE BORDER UNE. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO
PUSUC USE FOR STREET NM PUBLIC UTlt1Y PURPOSES. LOTS 'A' THROUGH Ir. NOJISAC.
W ALSO IEREBY DFO ATE 10 11[ CITY V SW JA0N0 LOT 'A. RE LANDSCAPE PIIPORS
GEMSTONE HOES INC.. A DELAWARE CRPORATOI
VI (A_ P/CS/ derT-
NOTARY ACLENT
t
COCOVMY OFAj,V .L 1 as.
0111/PERSO4- 9Y APPEAE.g0AE .E - JGL .1, -_ �.
PERSONALLY PROM THE1*1 0 ME ApE 9U/_ VISTOMIENT
/Ty�E
A0A0 105E0000EE TO ME TILT I /IbHB"REII1DTEO
T1pE40 SATEON TIE NSTUYENT 11HEAUTHOIZED
AND THAT BY
OR ENTRY UPON BEHALF OF .. TBE PECERI(Si ACTFA EIIECUTD THE INSTRUMENT.
CRESS MY HAND
AND FOR SAID STATE
MY PAL OF BUSINESS.
0 inn
COUNTY.
NY COI6MSSON BORES 7l
Cr DE
FFOOL011N0 DOERS OF bEASEENTS ARDOR OTHER 4.36 OF THE SLIBORIMON INTERESTS HHAAVE BENNCLOTTED:
SAN JACINTO :LAND ASSOCIATION, ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, HOLDER OF A RIGHT
OF WAY AND EASEMENT FOR ROARS AND FOR CONSTRUCTION AND YANIENAIO OF
ALL NECESSARY WATER PIPES AO DOMES, FLUME AND CONDUITS FOR ALL
PURPOSES OF MCADOO AND 001AESTC USE: THE EDICT LOCATION 1HEE0F NOT
BUNG G50DSL0 BY TIE RENYROS
IN THE CRY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT NO. 30462
RE1N0 A SIJBONSION OF A PORTION THE VEST HALF OF FARM LOT 1541 OF THE LANDS OF THE SAN
JACINTO LANDS ASSOCIATION, AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOO( 8. PAGE 381 OF
MAPS RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA. LOCATED N SECTION 32, T.4S. RAW, S.B.M.
K t A ENGINEERING, INC. JANUARY. 2004
TAX COI I ITCTGR'S CFRTIFPCATF
I (HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF 1111 OFFICE AS OF 1K5 DAZE THERE
ARE NO UFNS AGAINST TIE PROPERLY SHOW di TIE YAWN MAP FOR UNPAID STATE COUNTY.
MUNICIPAL. 01 LOCAL TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WMECTED AS TAXES. EXCEPT TAKES OR
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS DOL LTE0 A5 TARS, NOW A LIEN BUT NOT VET PAYABLE WiMH ARE
*SEAMED 10 EC S
DATED: 2004 PAUL MCOINE1L COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
BY: DEPUTY
IAILAQNILIJEEMISCATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND N TIE SUN OF E HAS BEEN COWIE°
ANC FLED NTH ME BOAR OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA.
CONDIIIOSD UPON THE PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, STATE COUNTY, MO60PAL dR LOCAL. AND
ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS C0EEC1® A5 TA1D5, OHM AT THE ME OF TIE FILING OF 1165
MAP WB1 111E COUNTY REORDER ARE A LIEN AGAINST SRO PROPERTY BUT NOT YET PAYABLE
AND SAID BOND HAD BEEN DULY APPROVED BY SAD BOARD OF SPERNSORS.
DATED: 2004
NAICY ROMERO
CLERK TO THE BOLD OF SUPERMSOIS
CASH TAX TOLD
PAUL MCDOINELD
COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
BY: BY:
DEPUTY DEPUTY
OTT ENGINEER'S STATFYFyT
I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAW EXACTED THE WTHN ANNEXED MAR: THAT THE SUBONSDN
SHORT HEREON IS SIIDTANTMLY THE SAE AS IT APPEARED CM TIC TENTATIVE YAP: THAT
ALL THE PROMSIOIL Cr THE SIDONOW YAP ACT AND OF WE OF/ OF SAN JACINTO
°ROMACE NO B73 HAVE BEET COPIED W11H, AND I AM SATISFIED NAT THIS YAP IS
TECHNICALLY CORRECT AS SHOWN.
DATED I -1 �Q�
FOR HABB IL OWINGL RCE 33103
0TY DVCNEER. CITY OF SAN JA01N0
PUBLIC WORKS DRtECTOR APPROVAL
THE STREET DEIXCATION5 SOWN ON ME MEW ADEIRD MAP ME HEREBY APPROVED MS
OAY 00 2004
PUBLIC WOES DIRECTOR. CT OF SAN JACINTO
_wl R RFOflRF
A WELIWART SW5 REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY BRAD FOUNDATION EIOHEMM, INC. CN
ADE 51. OGW. AS REILMM 0Y TIE HEALTH AND SAFETY CEDE OF CALIFORNIA SLICES 1533.
SURVEYOR'S STATEIME T
SHEET 1 OF 5 SHEETS
R'S 10TA 1a0IT
FLED (IRS — DAY O - 2004.
AT _ M. IN BODI< — OF MAPS
AT PAGES = — AT 1TE RECTUM
OF 11E CITY COG.
NO
FEE
GARY L 0)50
COUNTY ASSESSOR - CLERK - RECORDER
DEPUTY
SJBGNPM GJARARIEG NORTH ANGBCNI
TITLE COMPANY
I HEREBY STATE THAT I AM A UCNSED LAID SUB.EYGR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THAT
THIS MAP CONBLSINO OP FTC 5 SHEETS CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY
SIPERWS0I DUGND JANUARY Or 2003L THAT ALL MONUMENTS SHOW HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST
AND THEN POSHW1S ARE CORRECTLY S10BN, OR MULL BE N ACCORDANCE ETII THE TERMS
OF 1HE MONUMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE MAP. THE MONUMENTS MU. BE SIFTHSENT TO ENABLE
THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. THE SURVEY IS THE ANO COMPLETE AS SHOWN.
RTIJAM R. DPIRES -wow
33-04
DATED: CAA/ la 2004
L5 1510
CITY ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT
THE CITY OF 5A. JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY AID THROUGH ITS
GAY AUTHORIZED OFFICES AT A REGULAR UMW) ON 2003, HEREBY
APPROVES SAD FINAL NAP AND ACCEPTS TIE DEDICATIONS SOW HEREON FOR PUBLIC ROAD.
PUBLIC UIRJTES AND LANDSCAPE PURPOSES TIE ACC PTN1LE OF THE OFFER O: ODICATIO N
OF CITY Swim 15 CONTINGENT UPON TIE COMPLETION OF ALL STREET IMPROVEMENTS
DATED MIS DAY O
MAYOR
ATTEST
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
CITY OF SAN JAC1N10
CITY CLERK
PLANARNO CdNY15GION STATEMENT
111I5 NAP, TRACT NO 30462. IS A PORTION OF THE CRICWAL TENTED.* MAP OF TRACT N0.
30182 SAID TENTATIVE TRACT YAP WAS APPROVED Of THE CITY OF SAN JAONTO PI -NNW
COLO:WORI R4 ACCORDANCE WTI THE LAWN A DULY AUTHORIZED MEETING HELD MARCH 13,
2002.
CRY OF SAN JACINTO. CAISGNIA
SECRETARY. CITY OF SAN JA0NT0 PLANNING 031/1159GN
DATED THE DAY OF
00
w
ESPLANADE AVENUE
N 8754'43' W 2642.83' (2843.08' R1 & R2) (2542.99' R3)
(1321.321 (1321.54' R1 & R2)
2 • 1• N
5 ' i§A
101-4
kl
w
gA
9g
61
(1321.311 (1321.54' RI & R2)
N 0454'27" W (1321.411
37095'
ne=srww
NWIDOLD-
COI1R1
(1321.58') (1321.72 R1 & R2) L (1321.681 (1321.72' R1 /4 R2)
N59'5419'W (2643.38) (0043.44' R A R2) (2643.56' R3) (2643.45 R4)
7 TH STREET a:
12,
124,
di 0-
COTTONWOOD
w
0
b
w
340
n6E'A'61w
WARREN RD.
SARD 11_2N A b
LYDN
sAN JAU,N,.0
(2641.43' R3) (2040.10' R5)
N6454'23'w (2841.431 // -
SU3HS S
8
GRAPHIC SCALE
23 5a 1Ip
200
SCALE 1• a 50'
cum DATA
lac
arms
DELTA
AID
5,
10103'
worse
gem'
NOTE:
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SURVEYOR'S NO16, DATA
REFERENCE NOTES ANO 9 01' NOTES.
73
IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CAIJFORNIA
TRACT NO. 30462
®0' A SUBDIVISION OF A PORIOR 11E NEST NYF OF FIRM LIR 159 OF 11E LNIOS OF 11E SAN JACO= LAME
ASSOCIBIOIE AS SHOWN ON A WP THEREOF RECORDED B BOOK 8. PAGE 357 OF WPS, RECORDS 1r SW DECO
cowry. CAI1ORM. LOCATED B SEC1D11 32, T45, R.IW., SOD.
I( & A ENGINEERDIG. INC. JANUARY. 2004
MCAT KO. 30062-1 NL . / _
1Ba5]04Y 10100'
3
7314 Sr.
ED
$ 9 a �+A.
6 7 5. n413r. Kj s6/*
4 sr. a NM sr.}}^1
n !I
10
1 Dm lOJY '7t , 47 I•n wow5r.
I IN 1a IDrsi'04Y 225m•i LOT -H. \ -- W.1RiiY`51(^L
" �- aam' 0, Minn 127]1
1 MARIGOLD COURT
q ro i as� 11
.„ 1 y _ NV sr.
46
1021/3310411 (176.2s')
47
\\\ $ moss b4Y IOW } 61 70211 U
o.
CAJ\� ~
2 ca
----6 Ms sr. P. A a.,
G
4.§ arya I
�317
14 „ 1343
Nal ss. N
1511
7307 5F.
k I15r6T04Y mar
C lam 5 1mm
llaPslWY 10301 1 1 17 9 16 A,
5g( 16 7D4 sr. k aan ss. 1 fJ! 19
® 66 9� 1 g tl 7Dr sr. 6 1z 1 4�j,� t/j.i Y ma ss.
ll MaP90411 a00' "'// _- - 'O MO ) 51r' N �/ 1
/ 7Am ci cIa
(mm7J 6 I iFARM00,.....v
M wFADOWS pi DRNE 11,
N • tDr9'04Y c 12100_' 4am' �� 240.' 10
t9 $ RI I IDrsro s 551m I •'a' 7
LOT .I, @ 1 1ass7e.w IOaSI' AI LOT 'J' 7
C
�� — — — —ems 5. 59w5 lam ,4 SLOW
st.n 4b.27eY 7
r �v7 dp�,§I7` ,3, 1
„aa Sg
• 67 a1m Sr. = R P. ; 7rn sr.
d CI
1 5. 5'
e0'I
Alm I 1 1 72X
1aB55'04Y
(191m1
4r5340, 27am
41
27
22
g i a11a sr.
16.E
7505l04Y 37640'
29
SEE SHEET 4
12&45'
22
SHEET 3 OF 5 SHEETS
'rRkCi Y0. 30462-1 LJ.®. /
IMarm'1r total
66
7210 sr.
1aW541101/ moo'
7210 Sf.
1a45415111 10101
0 u. 721
ri
DTI 1010r
$ nlau. I
10754'0050 me'
4
5 sr.
'WY 1010r
63
7210 ss.
90w 10100'
7210 2
sr.
t5s4311 10300
201
3r.
Nar5r0057 10100
20
�' I
sa
al
19
1®54b5Y (OW341
tl
11 a 74m sr.
U
F it 1
to rs.mY 3OF]Y
IwJ
E 71 74
7417 ss.
Nose
70
7434 sr.
IU311S4bra 100.31'
71
7432 ss.
i0r5.'a0W 10950
72
74.W sr.
l5r34a01. 10aD'
77
73
NYa4'Ora loam
75
74m sr.
bow 100.11
78
NOTE:
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SURVEYORS NOIES, DATA
REFERENCE NOTES INO EASEINNT NOTES.
SEE SHEET 5
S.
45 .
49 -•A
1\
d
GRAPHIC SCALE
115 w�
TRACT MO. 304E2-1
57 05
3e156
47
IN THE CRY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT NO. 30462
IE112 A ST ESON OF A PORI1N THE MIST NM 00 FAA LOT 15a OF TIE DADS OF THE SW J/gNIO LINOS
ASSOTADON AS WillONA 1NP MEE6 RECORDED IN ROOK 0, PAGE 357 OF 110275. RECORDS OF SAN DE0
COWRY. CALM..LOCOSO LOCATED IN CI15 31.1.45... 0111- SRN.K & A ENGINEERING, INC. JANUARY, 2004
42
SEE SHEET 3
.,, (loam)
7200'�ii 0 nm 77.0E
40 722 SE H ag 26 d 0
n SF. 8 Tii g Tao ss. w 7m ss. I"
39 ' r s g
tam Sr.y�Jay' .1y} s S Nzabr
4 IaS�J' 21-ip 46.0eib. ST el_a" [r 4 E.Hr,•
• 5724' WVD, 'nAy ,per 1 z•"�
• `>'. I I r,7'-1,1r E1 11 I 15 1
35 b g I:msst�i IIJI 'B 15.E JX. zt5oo' `F g
ss' 1 LAVENDER 1 �ss'191r �0.90' COURT '4 I
NAY
1 Dt N6rse•NY' 178.7E CI I
1 MSM 2.9' EBB& 5714 4Y,y I
1 ▪ %a;
Tr
WE DATA
NO.
LI
W
10720'
l 53W10 170.7
azweta
N111505Y1
Na'S1'11Y
p
i 7p �eA
4 Y IR
36
7004 Sr. @
55er cur
taArttnt
09 32
MINCE
1111'
5111'
CONE DOA
NO.
011A
CI
I000D'
1500'5W
2025
24
14f SIOD•
8 2 gI J5ia+6. �L�7
lam Sr. & 33755F. 7•ait 3a SF. r 32 d ■
me sr. S
72a'
52 w
7t10 ST.
7L
5
8
no ss.
72.10' 72W
ICI54'4017 375.43'
NW'54 1.911 57683
23
g 31
sal SF.
6E]G
1R47251
54
7206 Sr.
81
22 ' MP54 011
rala1"Rff1 ,a w
T. P
58
eras Sr
SHEET 4 OF 5 SHEETS
n
Ner52011 109.05'
78
7201 SF.
tarsccow 1140E
10 7179
m sr.
95549711 10.10
�710'111D1f
eo
1 s
57.7,' U`1"R��/l' 13 C 4' i / - 7.
\I/' {�4
l6` er
od/ sa 7ae SF. .{,+ y, �y�`41
41.46• •C. V Yi
94
LOT .C.
N8754' 01r Sm.4Y
®91'
93
7205 SF.
®el'
8
92 w
1D ss.
.11
91 90
721e SF. mt u
aM' 1110
NY54175 lfIA1'
L0' 153 P01 6/367, 5.7. G9.
5e33'
as
1011 SF.
ass
77R
11a_ 7831'
°IWO idO. 30452.1
9a
le 104
g aOn as.
101
7275 ss.
IN THE CRY OF SAN JACINTO. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT NO. 30462
BBNC A SIECIPASEN OF A TERROR THE WEST RALF OF FIRM LOT 159 OF 11E LINOS OF 11E SW 3421140 LYI05
ASSOWNON• AS 91011P1 ON A IMP 14REOF FED IN BOOK B. PAGE 357 OF IMPS. RECORDS OF SW 0E90 CWMIT.
CNANW9A 1009393 IN sailor' 3S 1.49.. R.1W..
K & A ENGINEERING, INC. JANUARY, 2004
.0. /
I I
Ire
~J
09
IB9W1.
1210 ar.
33
L 38
87.331
N995C37111 132131•
LCT 153 DSO 3/357, S.C.CO.
S
37
93
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 25 50 100
200
SCALE: I. 50.
33
54a
96 Y
RIa as.
7>AV
SEE SHEET 4
35
34
72.14
IIWlNWn1 Anal
19 3449T1 375A5•
N595V'49Y 375E
LOT •C.
l S4''N'W 5750
tsar
95
nos sr. Y
wsr
W991•
B4
OARS SF.
OAF
SHEET 5 OF 5 SHEETS
NOTE:
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SURVEYOR'S NOTES, DATA
R@S Ust9 E DOTES AND EASENENT MITES.
(1321.311 (1321.54' RI & R2)
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET
IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT NO. 30462
BEING A SUBDNISIUN OF A PORTION THE WEST HALF OF FARM LOT 159 OF THE ANDS OF THE SAN
JACINTO (ANDS ASSOCIATION. AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 8, PACE 357 OF
NAPS. RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COMM. CALIFORNIA. LOCATED IN SECTION 32, T.45., R.1W.. S.B.N.
K & A ENGINEERING. INC. JANUARY. 2004
(660.132')
FD. 1' LP. w/ Pusrs RUG.
WIRER:MIRE, DN. 0.2'
P01 RN. CO. OR Bo 16.
ACCEPTED AS THE SW COR.
FIRM LOT 159 MO 1100 CL
113,w0c1.DON PER PUB 28/100.
DINE
COURT
ESTABUSHID BY
SINGLE PROPORTION.
(660.78')
POSSLM
COURT
PARCEL
•
F0. 1 1/4' IP. TAGGED.
'Ls RE54'. FLUSH N CONC.
PER PUB 1 34-35 FOR
FOR THE SE COR. ENDA
LOT 150 AND THE CL
1111110.6I. .
SANDERSON AVENUE
N 00306'58' E (264327') (2643.48' R1 & R2) (2843.41' R3) (2642.45' R5)
(351.67) (14227N)
10
101
86
NOP07'25"E
1o1 g
13
LET CLO,ER
Lt FARM MEADOWS
DRIVE
160006'56'E
35668'
60 81 62 63 64 65 68 67
SWEET CLOAB LOOP 106 '5
(11E8.10')
GLEN
9
V
176 175 174 173 172 I 70
(2643.12') (26,13.32' RI & R2
WIR
•
265
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 100 200 4m 800
1111
SEA E: 1' a 200'
5
LO
CAWSTON
A
(814.24)
PARCEL I
111 'Ls809S. TAGGED,
NO REF.. ACCEPTED AS
THE NE COR FIRM
SOT 151 MID THE 0.
INTERSECTION PER
PUB 26/100.
N 00'0 '53' E (2642.97') (2843.15 RI & R2) (2643.27' R3) (2643.00' RIB
KIRBY STREET RA 5287 Pll S
AVENUE
1D. 1 - IRON ROO.
ON. 16', PER me 13 0
ro "j 3 RCS.CAW.C.D. IMP OF
o SEC. 22. T.45.. R1W.. WEAL
FOR THE W' 1/4 COR SIM 32
.� AND C/L 1 N.
Ai
F0. 1 1/4' LP. TAGGED
ND WURY.. ION. 1B'
PPR8O4a/02�-0-02 & RCF.C.AW.00.
MAP OF SEC. 32. T.45.. R1W..
FMI THE N 1/4 CDR SEC. 32
AND O/L INIERSECDNI.
N000?02•E (2643.87)
(2643.97' R3) (2644.0I' R4) o
yT�DI01D/WA5I6'Pplf' N1L 6�. 0
ND. REF. A GI m11ASC/C/LI'
INRI6FLIro AHD ltff NW
CORNER OF FNM LOT TSB rtsa ' O
PER PUB 2B/100
V
SHEET 1 OF I SHEET
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
LINE DATA
N0.
EFEN=
INSTANCE
LT
No'M'36
2600'
L2
NEESSOP6
ORM'
LT
110058561
110,00'
U
21m83'04r1
tom'
15
HBNTaW
18100'
L6
I101r0f36t
3132'
U
IBP06'OOE
0731'
N
146564'03'I
1O3m'
'o1S0060'E
1036'
1
L10
N8954OJiY
161.34'
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTES
NI BEODNOM NSNL BE CONERSRC MIX CUSS B RAMO. AS PER THE
=FORM B11RMA cow.
THE REOWED WAKE 5181(E 0CWBNC IRE N16MMs 91.111. BE Dp1N1ID
AID! KLf0GD 61300 APPRorilivE wow A EHLT Mon TD ow
CowausT 1E MAMA 1151E P2 PLIED ON AN INOIAp6L UST.
DATE
LETTIN RED
R1c1Rs14M
DATE 01
HINISI0H
OmTPllgl
OWNERS STATEMENT
NE NEMRY STATE TIT NE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED WHIN 11E 95ON9ON
SHOWN HEREON. THAT WE ME THE ONLY PERSONS COURSE CONSENT I5 NECESSARY TO PASS A
OEM TIRE TO SAD LAND; THAT AE CONSENT TO TIE IMPS AND RECORDING OF THIS
91BDM1O1 MAP AS SHOWN NNNIN THE OSRCRYE TOMEA UNE JVE HEREBY DEDICATE TO
PUBLIC USE FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES LOOS 'C' TROUGH '0', NCUANE
NE ALSO MEW =CAE ID 11E CIIT OF SAN JACINTO LOT 103 FDR PARK NO MENNE PIW3S
WE ALSO MIME GOCATE ID ME CITY O 5N1 MORO ID15 'A' MD 4 FOR UMISCJPE PURPOTES.
GREYSIONE 40*405. INC- A DEIAWARE COB1(RAIION
T BCC
V LCl'i�c5l
itareffummaianamr
CoCgMTY6 1Yrr511, 3�Fs-s- yE,
PTFR•'SCNALLLY APPEAREO� 7NFT /HrE�Y�� A N N Pil'_
PERSCNALLY 101PM TO' M
'., � THE 10 CAE IMOSE 5 TAME 111E 04*41 JOBED I WS/I/1JNSI'NNS�TRUMENNTN06010
'., 002 SRI 1 EEHIT NT 51 NE TIE PERSONQ1 *0119T WEER MEIINST E TTFASON(6J
%M�IE,SS// MY H/An/ND' �C1i0
1 :y/L/ f MY 11 PA PEASE OF BUSINESS
/A�OI/AJgFPI.IBIUC CRT! ANO FOR SAD STATE IS R LI[.t.'C, # GUMMY.
V ./ �(IT( t• �Il 127, MY COMMON EAPRES IP414O.Y
SIGNATURE OMISSIONS
PURSUANT TO SECNT 56435 OF THE SUBDINSON MAP ACT, ONE SIGNATURES OF THE
FQLONES OWNERS OF ENEMAS AND/OR OTTER INTERESTS HAVE BEEN OPINED:
SAN JACINTO LAID ASSOCIATION. ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSETS, HOLDER OF A RIGHT
OF WAY AIM EASEMENT FOR ROADS AND FOR CONSTRUCTION AND UA ITOIMICE OF
ALL NECESSARY COMER PRIES AD DROSS. FLUMES AND CONDUITS. FOR ALL
PURPOSES IF OWGATT AND o0MESIC use, THE EXACT LOCATION THEECF NOT
BONO OISIAPSED BY THE RECORDS.
IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT NO. 30462-1
BEING A SUBONISION OF A POiTCN THE VEST HALF OF FARM LOT 159 OF THE LINOS OF THE SAN
JACINTO LANDS ASSOCIATION. AS SHOWN ON A MAP TEAEOF RECORDED IN BOOK B. PAGE 357 OF
MAPS. RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA LOCATED IN SECTION 32, T./S.. ROW, S.B.M.
K & A ENGINEERING, INC. JANUARY. 2004
TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY TIT ACCORDING ro THE RECORDS OF MS MINCE'. AS OF INS DATE THERE
UMWALAL OR LOCAL TAXER OE SPFJSALLENS MANSE ME PROPERTY .ASSESSMENTS ON E 0:EL MAP AS
UNPAAXES. STATE COUNT',
COIECNO AE TAXES. °SEPTMI TART OR
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED A5 TARS. NOW A LIEU BUT NOT VET PAVANE MINK ARE
ESIIMAIED TO BE f
DATED:
2004 PAL MCDONNE L. COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR
BT DEPUTY
TAX BOND CERTIFICATE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND N THE SUM OF f HAS BEEN I:STON ED
AND FILED NTH THE BOND CF SUPENNSOBS OF RE CQINTY OF RIVERSIDE. CONFORMAL
CONITTI COED UPON TOE PAYMENT OF AL TABS, STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL AND
ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TRIES. 'ARCH AT THE TIME OF THE RUNG OF MS
MAP NTH ME COUNTY RECORDER ARE A LIEN A0ANST SAD PROPERTY BUT NOT YET PAYABLE
AND SAW BOND HAS BEEN OILY APPOSED BY SAD BOND OF SUPERVISORS
DATED: 2004
NANCY ROMERO
CLERK 10 ROE BOARD OF SUPERNSOS
CAOI TAX BOND
PILL MCDONEELL
CWNTY TAX COLLECTOR
B BY:
DEPUTY DEPUTY
I HEREBY STATE RAT I HAM: EXAMINED THE MRON ARMED HAP; THAT THE 910GN90N
MOOT HEREON 5 SUBSTANTIALLY THE SINE AS R APPEARED ON ME IMAMS MAP: THAT
ALL THE PROMPTS OF THE SUOONSOY MAP ACT AND OF THE STY OF SAN JACINTO
ORDNANCE N0. 673 HAVE BEEN COMPILED NTH. AND I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS IMP 5
TECHNICALLY CORRECT AS PROM.
DRIED: ) - - 0
FOR HAKE M. MUILAN, RCE 35163
CITY ETN MEN, OTT OF SW JACINTO
I2011FIWI41 ?
METRES 12/31/2004
0450
pilaw WORKS DIRECTOR APPROVAI
THE STREET DEDICATORS 910WN C TIE WITHIN ANNEXED MAP ARE HEREBY APPROVED TIE
OAT OF 2014.
SOILS REPORT
A PREEMPT SOILS MITT IW FEDI PREMED BY WOMN FOUNDATION ENDI D, NC OR
VANE 211E DM. AS RETUNED DY RE HEµ9 NO SAFETY CEDE O MEMO . SECTION 119u
SHEET 1 OF 5 SHEETS
RECORDER'S STATFMF&
FILET TES _ BAY or 2004
AT M D BOOT - ON ARMS
AT PAGES = AT PE REQUEST
OF IRE OTT amK.
N0.
FEE
GARY L ORSO
COUNTY ASSESSOR - CLEAN - RECORDER
BY:
DEPUTY
S UMPAS104 GUARANTEE NORTH AMERICAI
1111E O111PANY
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
I HERMIT STATE TIT I AM A LAND SIMPER OF THE STATE OF CAI 0011* MID THAT
TORS LOP CORSSRNG Cr FIE (SON MEETS CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURREY MADE ENDUE NY
N 9IPET0OI DURING JANUARY OF ENS THAT ALL NOMINFNIS 910WH HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST
AND T1EIR POPTONS ARE CORRECTLY 91OMi T WILL RE N ACCORDANCE MR TIE TAWS
OF TIE MONUMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE MAP. TIE MONUMENTS COWL BE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE
THE SURVEY ro BE RETRACED. TE SURVEY IS TRUE AND COMPETE AS 9101141.
2004
YLLUAM R. KNIGHT. ILL 6610
SPIRES 09-30-54
DATED: 34.41.
Iz
Cm CCTPT*NCF STATEMENT
TIE art OF SAN JACN11), COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STATE OF CAUFONIA BY AND THROUGH ITS
DULY ATMOR150 OFFICERS AT A REGULAR MEMO ON 2003, KNEW,
APPROVES SAD RNµ MAP AD ACCEPTS THE DEDICATIONS SHORN HEREON 110* PUBLIC ROAD,
PUBLIC DOMES, LANDSCAPE, PAN. IWNNAGE(PIB POE,ll lUWB . TIE ACCEPTANCE CF
THE OFER W UEDICATIN OF OTY STREETS IS CONTINGENT UPON TIE COMREIlO1 OF AL
STREET IMPS:SEEN'S.
DATED TM DAY OF
MAYOR
ATTEST
OM OF SAN JACNTO
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
COY CLERK
PENNING [O USNATN STATILETIT
1N5 MAP, TRACT NO 30462-1 5 WN TI 4 PR1OF E MCRµ TENTATIE MM OF TRACT NO.
W 362 SAID TENTATIVE TRACT YM WAS APPROVED 0Y THE CITY OF 5M JACINTO PLANNING
01CORIISPOI N ACCORDANCE 1MM THE LAW IN A INKY AUTHOMM ZED E1410 RED MUCH 13.
2.
CLOY OF SAN A Nro. DAFORMA
SECRETARY. CLOY OF 5M JACINTO PANNING COMMISSION
DATED T195 DAY OF , 2004.
VICINITY HAP
N.TS.
SURVEYOR'S NOTES
1. ME BASIS OF SMARMS FOR T115 IMP IS THE
G01181 E OF SANDERSON AVENUE TOTEM AS
110006'58'E PER RIB 213/100.
2. TRACT N0. 30482-1 HAS 103 LOIS PLUS COTS
A' 1NR0008 '01. NCLI2,1.
3. TRACT NO 30482-1 COHERE 33.22 OR. AG1ES
BUNN THE 01511EICOVE BORDER.
ALL PUBLIC U11UIIES I/O NEE RACES INSTALLED
WONN IRIS TRACT ]HALL BE PLACED UNDERGRNNO.
5. 1' 0.0. NON PPE W/ MASTIC NIA0 STAMPED IS 6810'
SET P11191 AT ALL. REAR LOT CORNERS, UNLESS NOTED
OINOWLg
6. LOT CORNERS ADJACENT TO slNrtln REFERENCED D
LEAD & TAD, 15 0810' ON TOP 00 CURB AT TIE
PROIDNDATBN OF LOT SINES.
7. 0 INDICATES TYPE 'A' MONUMENT. STAMPED IS W10'.
SET FLUSH, PER RSV. CO. 510. NO. 903. UIDE S
NOTED OT ERREE
8. INDICATES TEE D' MONUMENT. STAMPED 'LS 6810'.
SET FLUSH, PER RN. CO. STD. N0. 90.2 UNLESS
NOTED OTHERWISE.
9. • NYG1E5 FOUND NONUSER. SUE AND DESCRIPTION
AS NOTED.
10. 'P.U.E' PECANS P9BUC MUFF EASEMENT DEDICATED HEREON
DATA REFERENCE
R1 - NEGATES RECORD DATA PER P119 27/10.
R2 - INOIDAIFS RECORD DATA PER FEB 28/100.
R3 - INDICATES RECORD DATA PER RIVERSIDE
COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER
CWP91TIOn DISTRCI we OF SLCIRN
32, T.45., RAW.. SEM.
NOTE: RECORD DISTANCES SHORN NE
441.615IED GROUND D1TNC6, OF TE
CALIFORNN COMDNATE ESTFL. ZONE 6.
LEASER COIEOTRML PROJECTION.
R4 - INOVATFS RECORD DATA PER RB 40/92-93.
R5 - INDICATES RECORD DATA PIER RB 13/W.
RB - INDICATES RECORD DATA PER NMI 9/68.
EASEMENT NOTES
1. A ROW OF WAY EASEMENT N FAVOR OF SN4 JAGMD
.010 ASSOOATKN. I6 3'w5`R50125 OR 4556342 FOR
WADS I/O FOR 11E CONSTRUCTION MD WNIUWICE OF
ALL NECESSARY WATER PIPES AND DITCHES, FLUMES AND
CONDUITS, FOR ALL PURPOSES OF IAAEATKA4 AND
DEESE USE; TIE MCI LOCATION THEREOF NOT
•REG DISCLOSED 9Y RECORD.
IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT NO. 30462-1
BONG A SUBONBION OF A PORTION THE WEST HALF OF FIRM LOT 158 OF THE LANDS OF THE SARI
JACINTO LANDS IASSOCNTNN. AS SHOWN ON A IMP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK B, PACE 357 OF
MAPS. RECORDS OF 5AN DIEGO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA. LOCATED IN SECTION 32. T.45.. R1W., 5.911.
K i A ENGINEERING, INC. JANUARY. 2004
4'1-.55£ 7 --�- 1.z278•
1 660R2 144 'A'__ la Y�
El. 1. LP. W/ PLASTIC PLUG. ESTAB ED BY Pg 90 91 92 93 94 BS BB
SINGLE PROPORTION. G
I;
4
n
n
UNREADMRE. 181.02'
PER RM. CO. TB 99 16.
KCEPIE) AS GE COR
MIDI LOT 159 M61 11E CL
I81ERSECIEN PER PUB 211/100.
ESFABUSNED BY
SINGLE PROPORTION.
860.78'
1321.32' (1321.54' 41 is 42)
N 99'54'27' W 1321.41'
PAHCa 4
dAt
Q A�
ir
SANDERSON AVENUE
N OO'06'56' E 2E143.27' (2643.48' R1 k R2) (2643.41' R3) (2642.45' R5)
i ?E
,0 �m
ESTABLISHED BY
SINGLE PROPORTION.
L1
97 98
99
08.14
SHEET 2 OF 5 SHEETS
CAWSTON AVENUE
FO. 1 - RON RUC.
DN. 16', PER PUB 13/90
& R.GF.CAW.CD.NAP OF
SEC. 32 T.45.. RAW.. 52.1 L
µU l/L W 1/NIER1DNCC. 32
C
a ry F0. 1 I/4' LP. TAGGED
N IWD Y111 PER
PM9 53 & RCE.C.&W.C.O.
DAP
SEC. OF SEG 32, T.45,. RI W. SBA..
N r FOR THE N I/1 CSEC. 32
AND CA WI
11N.
LW 'C
100
101
80
66
S
75 74'
85 BO 77 72 *IFu
79
7B
71
70
69
102
64
62
61
103
160.00'
N0006.5EE
x�
i'o
wu
'a
58.68'
N0008 566.0
.y Oi
13
^F
Ie
5 52
53
54
55
58
57
59 59
W
GRASSY MEADOW DRIVE Lot 'E'
50
49
45
0
0
47/
L4
1166.1IY
N 00'0T25' E 2643.12' (2443.32' R1 & R2)
0 100
FD. 1 1 4' I.P. TAGGED.
IS 90..W. FUER IN CON
PER PEI 193/34-5 FORG
FOR THE SE GDR. FIRS/
LOT 150 NO THE 12.
GRAPHIC SCALE
SOME 1' Y. 200'
48
5 20
19
40
42 39
43
44
45
39
37
IgElk
33
34
31
N
u29
28
2
3
4
5
36 ♦ l
2 22 23 P4 7
6
LB SWEEP GIVER t
18 17 18 15 14 13 1
N 07'53' E 2542.97 (2643.1E R1 h R2) (2643.27' R3) (2643.00' RB)
KIRBY STREET PM 5221 P
D
814.24'
TEL CRASS COURT
ESTABUSEm
BY SINGLE
PART PROPORTION.
W. 1' LP. TAGGED.
15 WED'. RUSK
NO REF., ACCEPTED N
THE NE CDR FNN
LOT 159 MID T8E CL
INTERSECTION
PER
23/
PLB 26/IO
1;
rc
N 00'03'02' E 2643.87'
(2643.97' R3) (2644.01' R4) pO
0006641 PK' R9L ^®
MC I4ET *NM. CA. INIERSECTION Al40 THE HIV
��
CORNER FARM
100 159 F4 UI
TEL
yIIII',
UNE DATA
N0.
9FNN0
DISTANCE
LI
NKTO6'S8'E
20.W'
12
N6763T4'W
10.00'
13
N0ODC56'E
319'
L4
NO0•06'00'E
9751'
L5
ostroettfw
103.08
11
NO0'06'W'E
10.66'
L7
N6854'00'8
189]4'
NAPE ORA
lE
n
li
Nose
WOW
a0'
etsn
0EIM'4H
s10C1.lr
NC
On`
INAS
LOE DATA
N6
u
52
WANG
NNIIeat
all•
GRAPHIC SCALE
b 90 1
240
NOTE
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SURVEYOR'S NOTES.
DATA INFERENCE NOTES AND EASEMENT
NOTM.
INDICATES EASEMENT FOR PONDING PURPOSES
DEDICATED HEREON.
SEE SHEET 4
IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CAUFORNIA
TRACT NO. 30462-1
BEING A SIEq*501 OF A PORTION THE W61 IP F OF MN LOT 159 OF TIE LMOS OF THE SIN JAONIO LAWS
ASSOa9pN. AS SHORN ON A WP THEREOF RECORDED N BOOK B. PILE 357 OF NAPS. RECORDS OF SW OEGO
OR M. FNTNWN. LOCATED IN SEDIKIN 02. L4S, RAW. SHY
K & A ENGINEERING. INC. JANUARY. 2004
SEE SHEET 5
53 54 55 56 57 55 53 53 / 133
04 GRASSY MEADOW ORNE �. �qq1 „\ R
, A -- Karam
k+ our �-"°°11 1 nLm ''tao' LOT 'E �nr 10�Ii; ��— I 31 lrzw' �ei!e'
NK/0i'0'E i ' -� 4 �- 1 IeYO'Yi Mg 1 XOOOFYE Mgr 1 ' 3 4 //1 Im®Y2
MAY SW
IOW -.NI NSW
sur 'TM sv v' 40k>o•E t'4 3`+'44 32 71 ua•sc ''.p.'T+y;�
amMFert 4 so
# egg Sr. >i$ 41 Mae ss. $ jII' eme ss. TO01 ss. ! $ 1
g F Ogg ss. O 6 A i h n21 sr. a
�U g _.. IWOOeiet n.m -�tj P E k NIraEMst 1rz1C-N000]1'C 10MM' p .
Kamer ,1M00' p@ ` 1,501 i,,.w 00 ��ry®$ i, sP,'3 g L! 4 - R e ; Iplmrt 1@K
42
R me SF. d�1W�m. --Poi 4 0 15n� INMe S.F. Maness. a"'uj. ` z 'SJ:NAMIllgEfr:::::14S.
E 33 .�4mm ss.�JB�$i'�'I1°A 21'tlp•� �YA• 1Y is% c�amMu.My' N9t4Y 111VOSJ E 1MLp'g1Rm•D41@M'9 a1N]POSTEtws•'ag NmaosE,NamxmacxE+135 ,$. 6 �+4R 7 0 �`' A7 3B y ktTk29
4;J ;�n ss. S`s)£umgty-_£�-zyiA sr. k etas ss. ss. n k esa sr. A ,e ik �I s`�rf'�rmsrRR B1+,6MTM�${�'6 e ��i �.
,, q Qt q �j �Y'I,h ! L 1W01TE 1641r
1 15°— 6 VA TN b. S kph$ aY L
vita,. {�'4. S b AMA• mr hl �d e¢oD M}
m�A>ti �: Pxtwt'M i A'Np,. o-a1.39.4 �,{E�y"! tOLp 1�
•
Ry
1 ‘..A. MS. Sr.
yl
1.1
S.45 i 7Aa 45 0 R weis0.
IOW SF. 1 li IDa0 SE S.
MA 8/357, &Q. C0.
SHEET 3 OF 5 SHEETS
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 30 60 1 2
NOTE:
SEE SIEET 2 FOR SURVEYORS NOTES. DATA
REFERENCE NOTES AND EASEMENT NOTE.
IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CAIJFORNIA
TRACT NO. 30462-1
FOCC A SImDMS0N OF A PORT ON PC WEST HALF OF FNW2 LOY lap OF 11E WES OF TIE SALT .601T0 LINOS ASSOCLAIICM,
AS SRAM ON A WP 114MOF RECOPIED N BOOR 4 PALE 357 61 1e1PS. RECORDS OF SAN DECO COLMIY, CALOOIEA
LOCATED N SECTION 32. TAS., M11W., S.0JL
K & A ENGINEERING. INC. JANUARY. 2004
nor
I
1Wvarare p _�
/Wad
LOT A� NOM'E a14'p0 n noC
90 I >; g
73311 SF.110002781
•
nm
I
AKOA3e2 LEl se
7303 S.F.
72ar
N 0000301 IO1M
9300 S.F.
110823' E
vavo'ss. g
01
1
7032
SANDERSON
LOT 'C'
g7200 sr.
Ate
M
94
N
mar
11000Y1e' F 11370
1320212
5 95
d 72vv v.
AVENUE
15005'55i now'
LOT 'B'
mA
110Vf65e' F
•
96 3
7300 32. g
706'
SWEET CLOVER LOOP '�"` "°O1'
M 006511' E 316118
m _ ,e— aae r _
IE100E 18232 ' N011233L IDSf0
O
E
3yy1311 �/;
92 3gm'/till q ]j A \ vY'
8310 5
e'AS.F.
IISA R 0i6 113N
(
5
C 7M6 SF.
j
lour
eoormt
84
7245Sf.
m9t
90
flu SP.
IIOWm 6a'eel. 1000'
ai
20.02
6000165. E 332
L
L'f !6] R3 31267, &O. CO.
mar
LOT 'C'
1°nce
74 E'24ar'"la§r'>s.
R3r
•
P 5 h
g 7374 F. 2
71A
7120'
g52
73a1 SF.
710'
i'
5
R
R
M11, 1vlav
rr3r• iN/
°" e3ae S
69
9010 3.2
0o?o SF.
g 9.
71.A
53
g 73HSF.��I
71s'
1333
7120'
•
b 54 3
g 7334 SS. g
7132
7130'
g73.31 Sf.
7130'
SHEET 4 OF 5 SHEETS
Aa
1311.18.
]
1000696E ISIaF�
66
34
59
i
LOT 'E 6 O00HW E 71035' b N COMIC E en31'
OlaCtr
GRASSY MEADOW DRIVE
411
SEE SHEET 3
SEE SHEET 5
GRAPHIC SCALE
2
SCALE 1' - W
NOTE:
SEE SHEET 2 FOR SURVEYOR'S ND1ES,
DATA REFERENCE NOBS NID EASEMENT
NOTE
IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RNERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT NO. 30462-1
BERG A SOBWASIDN OF A FURROW 11E WEST RALF OF FARM LOT 15B OF THE 1/NOS OF OE SIN JACINTO IANOS
ASSOLVMNIN. AS SNDIRI ON A 1W 11FIEOF RECORDED IN BOOK B. PACE 357 OF EW'S, RECORDS OF SIN DEOO
COMTE. CANFDNOI LOCATED W SECRON 3; TAi NiW_ S.BJL
K & A ENGINEERING, INC. JANUARY 2004
SEE SHEET 3
SHEET 5 OF 5 SHEETS
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT SHEET
IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
TRACT NO. 30462-1
BONG A SUBON1510N OF A PORTION THE WEST HALF OF FARM LOT 159 OF THE LANDS OF THE SAN
JACINTO LANDS ASSOCIATION. AS SHOWN ON A IMP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOON 5. PAGE 357 OF
IMPS. RECORDS OF SAN DECO COUNTY. C41ORM4 LOCATED 01 SECTION 32. T.45.. R1W.. S.B.M.
K & A ENGINEERING, INC. JANUARY, 2004
SANDERSON AVENUE
N 00'06'56' E 2643.27' (2643.48' 51 & R2) (2643.41' R3) (2642.45' ES)
559.67 - 142276'
( FO. 1' LP. W/ P14511G PLUG, 1 5
j., 86
1NRDDA8LE. DR 02 ESTABLISHED BY "y
PER RN. co. T8 99/16. SINGLE PROPORTION. FR
ACCEPTED AS THE 5W COR.
FAAN LOT 159 BB DE CL
ITERr'ETON PER PAM 25/10.
CAWSTON S\ AVENUE
njl
_ iA 1
To n D1. 16'C.F. PER P0. *6
t 13/90
Rti. T.4I.C.O. MW K
SEC. 32. 911.. RAW. SB. 3
FOR TIE W 1/4 CAR . 32
AMI C/L INR]iSEC110N.
C N FD. 1 1/1. LP. TAGGED
• n
T'd z
IN
PMB� 3pER
8
MAP OF SEC. 32. T.45.. RAW.. S.BY..
FOR M N 14 CCR SEC. 32
1
1321.31" (132154' R1 & R2)
ESTABUSHET BY
awJ F PROPORRON.
S6U.78'
1321.32' (1321.54' RI & R2)
N 3W54'37* W 1321.41'
FARCEL 4
41,
F0. 1 1/4' LP. TAGGED.
is ease. num. IN CONO.
PER RIB 195/34-9 FOR
FOR THE SE COI. FARM
LOT 159 A40 111E GI.
IMEASECIWN.
Lot
ESTABLISHED BY
ANGLE PROPORTION.
89
88
Lot g
Lot 'C
✓
1158.10'
N 00'07'25' E 2543.12' (264332' 01 & R2)
91
B3
84
85
86
92
93
82
81
80
94 95
96
97
96
99
00
101)1
SWEET CLOVER LOOP Lot 'G'
79 78
17
1109065565E 51
U
y B
is8
72
52
71
53
67
BB
70
54
66
2
.= 85
0 8 62
69
55
64
56
57
i
103
61
58 59
60
4
GRASSY
EADOW
Lot 'E'
50
P
49
48
47
t
GRAPHIC SCALE
O 1Boo
A'iNE 20'
46
41 40
44 37
21
19 18
22
.3
36
23 24
SWEET
32
4
31
30
29
4
CLOVER�E,\\9
17 16 15
)
N 0707'S3" E 2642.97' (2643.15' R1 & R2) (2643.27' R3) (2643.00' R6)
EITBY STREET
14 13
814.24' _ V
TALL GRASS COU9T
ESTABLISHED
91 SINGLE
PARCEL 1 PRDPO .
E5 8085'. FLUSH.
NO REF.. ACCEPTED AS
THE NE CDR. FARM
LOT 159 AND 111E CL
W18 28/4UN PER
PR)15287 PliA3 / 543
4I
N 00"0$02T E 2643.87
(2643.97' R3) (2644.01' R4) qo
p
W FOUND
15 ul1•.RLSH. 'Y� 0
N0. REF. ACCEPTED A9 C/L EErrI
INIElIgCIION AND 111E NW CORNER OF FNIII ▪ E3
PER P159 25/100 !N 959
V
SHEET 1 Of 1 SHEET
VICINITY MAP
N.TS.
LNE DATA
N0.
DEMING
&STNCE
L1
N0906'S6'E
200'
L2
/08SY04Y2
10.00'
L3
NOW06'S6'E
31.32'
14
NO011800"E
97.51'
L5
118W54'01T
10E00'
L6
110906'00'E
1056'
11
N88543011'
16034•
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTES'
ALL BIA1409 9WL BE LONSM1CNT MM GLI M 9 wTAML As PER IRE
CILIFORM 91ADEIC COLS
TE 16591ED w1EA smog. 0,0104G FIRE 1905005, 9W1 BE 06TN1ID
N05 ADDP10 81 THE 11791059841E WATER AMC/ TIER 1D ANT
0105161101E ELODNB 11AI61ML RACED ON NI 9101WOYL LOT.
OWL
EMU? RED
REQUESTINO
Tom
REVISIONS
6mn
DEATW ON
AGENDA ITEM 6
February 5, 2004
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Habib Motlagh, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Ramona Boulevard/Sanderson Avenue Waterline — Project No. 02-
008
RECOMMENDATION:
By motion, award public works contract to Utah Pacific Construction Company for
the sum of $385,450, and 15% contingency; reject all other bids received; and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract.
BACKGROUND:
On November 20, 2003, Council authorized staff to advertise for construction of
Ramona Boulevard/Sanderson Avenue Waterline Installation. Bids opened on
January 26, 2004, with six bids received ranging from $385,450.00 to
$908,020.00. (staffs estimate is $700,000.00). This project is Phase II of De
Anza Lift Station, Gravity Sewer, Force Main, and Water Main, which includes
installation of approximately 11,800 L.F. of 12" waterline along Sanderson Avenue
and Ramona Boulevard. As you may be aware, partial installation of waterline was
done in conjunction with Phase I of this project. With the installation of this
waterline, the system will be operational and property owners will be able to
connect to this new system.
Due to the considerable difference in bid costs received, staff and EMWD have
contacted Utah Pacific Construction Company to confirm their bid. We are also
memorializing our conversation with both EMWD and the contractor as to minimize
future misunderstandings.
Appr ap
City Manager: (\\\
Finance Director:
Page 1 of 2
Utah Pacific Construction Company has performed work for EMWD; this
company recently completed a 12" PVC line, a 24" PVC line, and a 30" PVC line
for EMWD, and according to EMWD their work is satisfactory.
Timeline for this project is as follows:
o Mandatory Start of Construction — February 23, 2004
o Expected Project Completion — June 21, 2004
JUSTIFICATION:
Installation of water line facilities along Sanderson Avenue and Ramona
Boulevard will facilitate the development of this general area, and implement the
Council's Goals and Objectives.
BUDGETARY IMPACT:
Adequate funding is included in current Fiscal Year Budget 03-04, as project No.
02-008, which include federal grant and EMWD contribution
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Summary of Bids Received
2. Project Map
Page 2 of 2
Ramona Boulevard/Sanderson Avenue Waterline
Bid Opening - January 26, 2004 - 2:00 p.m.
Company Name
Bid Amount
Bid Bond
Utah Pacific Const. Co.
$385,450.00
J
Choctaw Contractors, Inc.
$490,774.00
J
Genesis Construction
$525,777.00
J
SRD Engineering
$703,670.00
J
Sean Malek Eng. & Co., Inc.
$846,000.00
J
KEC Engineering
$908,020.00
J
RAMIO\ A EXPY
0
tt
ri
a
3
Cil
La Z.
0.
z�
66
COTTON OOD
IESPLAVADE
} AVENUE
E—
z
cn
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT SITE
RAMONA
MAIN ST. / \
ESPLANADE
AVENUE
H WY. 74
AGENDA ITEM 5, 7
February 5, 2004
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Bernie SimorY, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution of Initiation of Lighting, Landscaping, Park District
No.1 (LLPD#1) Assessment for FY 2004-05
RECOMMENDATION:
By motion, adopt Resolution of Initiation ordering District Engineer to prepare and
to file a report related to maintenance of public improvements in City of San
Jacinto Lighting, Landscaping Park District No. 1 for the FY 2004-2005 Property
Tax Roll.
BACKGROUND:
For this purpose, District Engineer refers to the Consulting Civil Engineering firm
of GFB-Friedrich, Inc., who will be the assessment engineer. The Assessment
District is divided among five zones with assessments involving over 9,000
individual parcels. Resolution of Initiation starts the assessment procedure in
action for the FY 2004-2005 tax roll that would be adopted on or about July 2004.
No new parcels are being annexed into LLPD #1, with the exception of those
tracts or APNs already conditioned to join LLPD#1 or infill projects in the older
areas.
Staff will present the Engineer's Report for approval and set a public hearing date
for any public protest or input when such report is available. Should there be no
majority protest, City Council may then adopt a resolution confirming a diagram
and authorizing the levy of assessments in LLPD#1 at the following meeting.
LLPD#1 is a pre -proposition 218 district that has no cost escalation clause. The
maximum assessment cannot be increased without a vote of landowners.
City Manag
Finance Director: ///AM, 1,1
1
JUSTIFICATION:
Starts annual work on annual assessment district levy required by California
Streets and Highways Code section 22622.
BUDGETARY IMPACT:
No cost is attributed by this action.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution oflnitiation-LLPD#1 Resolution No.
2
•
•
SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET
• • EXHIBIT ^A" •
BOUNDARY MAP
LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND
PARK DISTRICT NO. 1
Vat a
lint
LEGEND
.+vn w^e e44
mr
Enna' al. Eawl
tor th.
CITY OF SAN JACINTQ
FISCAL YEAR 2003-04
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) RESOLUTION NO:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CITY ENGINEER
TO PREPARE AND TO FILE A REPORT RELATED TO
MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK
DISTRICT NO. 1, AND ANY ASSESSMENT THEREON FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2004-05
WHEREAS, heretofore the City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and
Park District No.1 was created pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the California
Streets and Highways Code ( §22500, et. seq.); and
WHEREAS, California Streets and Highways Code §22622 provides that
this Council shall adopt a resolution generally describing any proposed new
improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements in such a district
and ordering the City Engineer to prepare and file a report related to annual
maintenance and assessment in such a district; and
WHEREAS, no new improvements or substantial changes in existing
improvements are proposed for said Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No.
1; and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined and ordered by the
City Council of the City of San Jacinto, as follows:
Section 1:
Section 2:
The Recitals, as set forth in Part A of this Resolution, are in all
respects true and correct.
The City Engineer, or designated District Engineer, hereby is
ordered and directed to prepare an annual report as specified in
California Streets and Highways Code §§22565, et. seq., with
respect to City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and Park
District No.1 for Fiscal Year 2004-05
Section 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Passed, Adopted and Approved this 5th day of February, 2004.
ATTEST:
Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney, City of San Jacinto
City of San Jacinto
By Jim Ayres, Mayor
CERTIFICATE
I, Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do certify
that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto held on the 5th day of
February, 2004, by the following vote:
2004.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 5th day of February,
Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk
2
AGENDA ITEM 5, 8
February 5, 2004
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Bernie Simon, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy and Collection
for Lighting, Landscaping, Park District No.2 (LLPD#2) Annual
Assessments for FY 2004-05
RECOMMENDATION:
By motion, Adopt Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy and Collection
for Lighting, Landscaping, Park District No.2 (LLPD#2) Annual Assessments for
FY 2004-05 and ordering District Engineer to prepare and to file a report related
to maintenance of public improvements in City of San Jacinto Lighting,
Landscaping Park District No. 2 (LLPD#2) for the FY 2004-2005 Property Tax
Roll
BACKGROUND:
For this purpose, District Engineer refers to the Consulting Civil Engineering firm
of GFB-Friedrich, Inc. The Assessment District is divided among the original area
and ten annexation areas called zones with assessments involving over 1,500
individual parcels. There are currently another six zones in progress to be
annexed with approximately another 700 parcels. Resolution of Initiation starts
the legal procedure so that the City may eventually place LLPD#2 assessments
on the FY 2004-2005 tax roll.
Staff will present the Engineer's Report for approval and set a public hearing date
for any public protest or input when such report is available. Should there be no
majority protest, City Council may then adopt a resolution confirming a diagram
and authorizing the levy of assessments in LLPD#2 at the following meeting.
LLPD#2 is a post proposition 218 district. In future years, assessments could be
increased by the CPI, not to exceed 7.5%, but never above the actual costs
incurred to maintain the facilities of the district.
City Manager.
Finance Director:
JUSTIFICATION:
Starts annual work on Assessment District required by California Streets and
Highways Code section 22622.
BUDGETARY IMPACT:
No cost is attributed by this action.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution of Initiation-LLPD#2 Resolution No.
2
rr
EXHIBIT "A"
BOUNDARY MAP
LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND
PARK DISTRICT NO. 2
for the
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
LEGEND
r J .�usswn mma m.cu.
City of San Jacinto
Lighting Landscape Assessment District #2
Original Area and Annexations through Zone 10
• Zone 1 and 1A —
Sagecrest Development
— State/Chase/Sagecrest
— 255 Units
Zone 2
— CNH/Empire Homes
— Washington/Meridian
— 90 Units
Zone 3
— Diaz Dev -
- Cottonwood /Kirby
— 69 Units
Zone 4
— Osborne Development
— Evans/Las Rosas
- 37 units
Zone 5
— Osborne Development
— Ramona Blvd/Savory Lane
— 65 Units
• Zone 6
— Canaday Development
— Cottonwood/Palm
— 66 Units
▪ Zone 7
— JD Pierce Development
— Cottonwood/Kirby
— 249 Units
• Zone 8
— Lennar Homes
— Kirbyl7th St.
— 337 units
Zone 9
— CNHNantage Development
- San Jacinto St/Ramona
Expressway
— 225 Units
Zone 10
— Western Pacific
— Rancho San Jacinto
— 177 Units
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)ss
CITY OF SAN JACINTO )
RESOLUTION NO:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF
1972 FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF THE ANNUAL
ASSESSMENTS AND ORDERING THE DISTRICT'S ENGINEER
TO PREPARE AND TO FILE A REPORT RELATED TO
MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO LANDSCAPING, LIGHTING AND PARK
DISTRICT NO. 2, AND ANY ASSESSMENT THEREON FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2004-05
WHEREAS, heretofore the City of San Jacinto Landscaping, Lighting and
Park District No.2 was created pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Califomia
Streets and Highways Code ( §22500, et. seq.); and
WHEREAS, California Streets and Highways Code §22622 provides that
this Council shall adopt a resolution generally describing any proposed new
improvements or substantial changes in existing improvements in such a district
and ordering the District's Engineer to prepare and file a report related to annual
maintenance and assessment in such a district; and
WHEREAS, no new improvements or substantial changes in existing
improvements are proposed for said Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No.
2 (LLPD#2); and
WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, determined and ordered by the
City Council of the City of San Jacinto, as follows:
Section 1:
Section 2:
The Recitals, as set forth in this Resolution, are in all respects true
and correct.
The District's Engineer hereby is ordered and directed to prepare
an annual report as specified in California Streets and Highways
Code §§22565, et. seq., with respect to City of San Jacinto
Landscaping, Lighting and Park District No.2 for Fiscal Year 2004-
05.
1
Section 3: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Passed, Adopted and Approved this 5th day of February, 2004.
ATTEST:
Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney, City of San Jacinto
City of San Jacinto
By Jim Ayres, Mayor
CERTIFICATE
I, Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do certify
that the foregoing Resolution was passed, adopted and approved at a regular
meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto held on the 5th day of
February 2004, by the following vote:
2004.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 5th day of February,
Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk
2
AGENDA ITEM rp.%
February 5, 2004
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Peter A. Cosentini, City Manager
SUBJECT: Painting of City Hall
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council give direction on Council Member Shaw's
request.
BACKGROUND:
Council Member Ken Shaw has requested that an item be placed in the Council
agenda to discuss the painting of City Hall. Council Members Shaw has
suggested using development agreement fee moneys to paint City Hall.
Certainly, these funds can be used in any way the Council sees fit. They are
considered general fund unrestricted moneys. I have recommended to Council
to use these funds for our deficit situation. However, the Council has declined
the recommendation and has asked for a report back on how to use these
moneys in relation to the specific traffic and road issues surrounding the
developments that generated the money. It is estimated that this staff report
shall come before the City Council at the second meeting in February along with
the mid -year budget report. This is the current time frame goal. I would not
recommend to the Council that we use these funds for the painting of City Hall,
due to our financial position.
JUSTIFICATION:
Enhance the aesthetics of our newly renovated Downtown area.
BUDGETARY IMPACT:
The estimated cost of painting City Hall is between $4,000 and $5,000.00. This
includes some stucco work.
City Manager:
Page 1 of 2
Finance Director:
ATTACHMENTS:
None
Page 2 of 2
12/22/2003 10:51
9090000000
NO
PAGE 01
FA
TO: /te a e / G BF .1:
DATE: /'Y/iv
FROM: �`^.A✓
PAGES: /
Central County United Way
2587 S. San Jacinto Street
San Jacinto, CA 92583
909/929-9691 FAX/909-652-0064
MESSAGE: n�£,sv
, Including Cover Sheet
T Mai 4 17fz, K0 H-1 � Dc✓0L p O -T
See us on the Web at CCUW.ORG
Mayor opened at 7:07
Present: Ayres, Conner, Carlson-Buydos, Shaw
Absent: Dale
Invocation Sauter
Pledge Bob Otta
Special Presentations
Public Comments
Joan Berggan, representing Alexandru family — she introduced family —
explained she believes the problem is with the Alexandru property. In 20 yrs
haven't had a residential burn that fit this rule. Has had several deals that fell
through.
Adrian Alexandru, would like CC to speed up this process. Has been trying to
sell past 2 yrs. Mortgage company always decline. Explain expenses of family 5
children 1 on the way oldest in college.
Len Souza, 1305 Free Mark Court, here to talk about 3 items Park Hill
development, dust,
Hearing lot of construction early in morning; doesn't believe developers are
making the dust. Cosentini explained punative dust and what they are doing to
control dust.
Condition of Park Ave — doesn't know what is going on between City of San
Jacinto and Hemet. Dividing line is center of road. That road is in such bad
shape drives it 2X per day. Hoping CC will get the developers to take care of it.
Patch on patch, needs
Complemented CC on being well prepared and working hard for the city in the
few of the cc meetings
Perry Hewitt, 1093 Rinehart St, present cc and Mayor opinions he has heard
and he does not support out sourcing pd. He believes first priority is fire & police.
We have pd that has ownership and would like to keep it.
Maureen Williamson, Main St, update on signatures gathered to keep pd now
have 1096. Consensus Not a referendum just concerned. Her concern is for her
and childrens safety. Concerned citizens have not taken any money by the pd or
others. In655 dividuals spending their own money, printing.
I 0so1 NO• a5(0
6-7-
tit 11 d511
Bob Ottta, 655 E Main St Sp #92, thanked the city on behalf of mh park owners.
Trees have been trimmed. Thanked cc courtesy shown to him and He and his
wife moving Belin NM in 6 mos to yr. Appreciates other courtesies.
Sam Gaines, 895 Torino Ave SJ, Address the audience (faced them) felt like a
viganlante party as he came to mtg. Not sure that is the way to accomplish what
they are trying to do. Asked cc be allowed to make a good decision for sj. Lives
on the other side of the river. 3 vehicles stolen in community next to Soboba Golf
Course. Giving them CC opportunity to do their job.
John Hunt, 1130 Commonwealth, SJ moved 6 yrs ago, counts on pd —
supported current mayor in replacing previous cc. If money cut corners some
where else, lived in 8 different homes around the cnty, believes criminal to get
rid of police force.
Public Hearing
3.1 Resolution initial CFD 2003-1 Annex No 2
Jeff Ballinger, intro.
Public Hearing opened at 7:30 Clerk no comments no one in audience to speak
Mayor moved Shaw 2n passes 4/0
City Depts
4.1 Traffic Calming Standards
Motlagh gave staff report: Last disc at 12/4/04 mtg — there presented with traffic
engineers report and then went to subcommittee, met 1/12/04 and made
recommendation to CC . In relating policy city wide, improvents that want
installed need to gather petition signed by the homeowners adjouning st. and
only local road, 40' width and 800' length min. also street grade should not
exceed 5% slope, site distance evaluated, & cc makes final determination on
each request.
Warwick, Roanke, & , input from citizens. Did some signage, extra
police patrol. No budget. Cc to determine where to get
Conner — 51 % of the residents, questioned if it shouldn't include feeder streets;
concern is raised by those presenting signatures, Conners believes should be
neighborhood.
Ayres — subcommittee noted this neighborhood should be surveyed but
everything else in Warwick & Roaneke are cul de sacs.
Chris — some type of notice and for those directly impacted which are those are
the ones on the street. Due process available, didn't want to be distruptive to
neighborhood.
Ayres — this is pilot program.
Chris — adopt standard - 4 listed are consistent problem with accidents incl
personal injury 2nd part would be so that developers now can design to not have
speed humps or pay to have them installed. Her recommendation is that jump
start and standard be adopted.
Conner ? Savory — only 4 houses yet all the traffic comes from cul de sacs. Chris
- Savory was not supposed to be a through street. Disc.
Ayres — questioned about how petition will be done. $40,000 out of developers
fees supports that funding can cm approve contracts — Habib — cm could.
No public comment
Ayres support as presented. Strong support of speed humps from neighborhood
meetings, tried a variety to slow people down that have not worked.
Chris moved to approved as city policy at 4 locations & allocate $40,000 from
development fund. Passes 4/0
4.2 Fire Stations
Barron during 12/18 mtg looked at proposed sites at build out approx 20 yrs.
With overhead address realignlment of Hwy 79. Have incl future roadways
anticipated. Reviewed handouts. Response study for proposed stations.
Barron suggested new downtown station — has better response time. Ea
station has 2.5 min radius. Looking into future, state can't guarantee existing
mission from current site. Potentially could partner with college that has
pluses for state and city.
Very comfortable with this plan and believe cc comments were considered
and worked with proposed Hwy 79 alignment.
Will need future truck co. and can do that at esplanade and Hewitt.
Ayres noted a ladder truck won't fit in current facility. Barron parat of reason
for recommending new fire station at Hewitt at esplanade, $850,000 dollar
investment needs to be housed inside. 2 acres needs for each stations
Need of battalion fire chief to serve as fire marchall when 3 station added.
Would like to come back with zoning map and see what is available.
Ayres — encourage staff to find 2 acres on west end. Cottonwood &
Sanderson
Chris — staff listed in report — Peter responded staffing is consistent in CFD
report and direction.
On Sanderson n at is that not a bridge — verified info correct.
Conner — new map appreciates thoroughness. College station will run out
property. Suggested land banking all sites. Cottonwood open. State street
limited land. Doesn't know how we are going to build kitties to designate
now rather than 20 years from now when prices have doubled or tripled.
Cosentini — secure property in areas that might be scarce soon. Three levels
expense, land, people, building — staff will bring back
Chris moved to approve and direct staff investigate 2nd site and securing all
sites, Conner 2nd passes 4/0
4.3 Traffic Reports
Motlagh gave staff report — apologized traffic eng. Had emergency and
couldn't be here. So he will present. Arkage Eng — 3 sep traffic reports.
Ayres — intersection at Idyllwild and State is most concerned from input he
has rec'd from citizens. And noted Dale was concerned about speed on
Main. Motlagh spoke with him and he noted he was ok to proceed tonight in
his absence.
State & Idyllwild — have to work with caltrans — light is warranted from study.
Gave options staff recommends alternative access option b — install raised
median prohibits left turn in one direction only.
Chris ? speed issues. Habib adopt recommendations from traffic eng.
Habib other option is raised median in middle of intersection. Conner
questioned the neighborhood to get to DeAnza Elem. Suggest add'I lane
before light. Habib implement some things to stop accidents. Habib
recommends option b and depends on process req with Caltrans.
Habib there are enough accidents to warrant E& W and No & So
Conner intersection state and Idly adopt B and see if could put rt turn into
Idyllwild. Towards school east off of state street.
Habib not a problem amend budget by approx $20,000 can bring back closer
estimate if money needed potentially can do something like Eagle and
expressway
Chris 2"d passes 4/0
/ Habib Stubblefield request traffic calming - Sheriff & Main — would become
4 way stop, Mistletoe and Main, Hewitt & Main — both sides of park. Habib
suggested further narrow striping to slow traffic.
Conner thinks more imp at Alexander vs Sheriff. Eng can evaluate if cc
desires.
Chris - ? will cc review — would like to see after lotto line. What all the total
improvements.
Mayor suggested may be doing turnouts for RDA buses. Cheaper upfront
than after redone.
Habib noted new development will be conditioned to repay City. Not adding
to main just redoing.
Chris moved recommendation plus direction to staff signage and striping
Conner 2nd passes 4/o
Chase St — has become speeding area. To install chase & sagecrest. And
chase and ; speed limit 25mph
Chris - ? rule for collector not considered residential because doesn't have
driveways.
Habib Ping Comm are requesting traffic reports and address these issues
before they become problem.
Chris - when do we have an adopted standard — Habib doesn't know will
have to ask traffic eng. He will be available to cc in next 60 days to report
on speeding report city wide. She suggested it be incl in mtg with school
district.
Conner - because sagecrest and chase are the main exits out of subd.
They need to move it out quickly.
Ayres — commented that there is too much speeding in residential areas as
cc mtgs; at neighborhood mtgs same no. one issue. Idea was to slow traffic
down.
Conner questioned how there could be warrants that could require based on
numbers of homes in area.
Chris — Chase doesn't have speed limit. Housing tract doesn't have 3 exits
like they are required now. Expects situation is going to get worse when
school is opened.
Mayor noted vouched what he deals with turning into his area.
Officer Ritchie, - personal opinion with professional background. St has to
be narrower than 40'; or 14 hse in 1/4 mile; Chase doesn't meet criteria.
Technically speed limit is 55mph. Agreed with stop sign at chase and
cypress. As a citizen needs to stop momentum. Advised cc to consider
liability issues in school area.
Chris - ? what school will prepare. Habib ideally works with city and traffic
eng. Habib hasn't been consulted in the past 6 yrs by school.
John Hunt — on Commonwealth — 3 way stop at Park Hill School. Most
parents don't stop picking up or dropping off. 60% residents don't stop
either. Inc! Hemet officer. Putting up sign doesn't mean it will be obeyed.
Bob Otta — Main St across from market response — main st will be getting
and should address issues better
Eng recommends 'd' - questioned Monterey — will bring back; safe access
plan from school. Habib will bring back. Disc at joint mtg if necessary.
Chris moved Conner 2"d passes 4/0
4.4 Weed Abatement
noted mulch comes from our tree trimmers; utilizing public service worksers.
Ayres questioned if had to be sprayed first. Bob 6 in thick and doesn't require to
be spread.
Shaw - ? Bob responded like to use herbaside in certain conditions but prefer
woodchips helps retain soil if dry and windy.
Conner — ? Bob not in waterflow areas, not next to street; mower dedicated 8-9
mos yrly. Reviewed where work is being done.
Ayres — spray program is reported to CC. Bob already started spraying.
Bob recomm is free mulch and public service workers because of budget impact.
Conner noted don't want waste to drop so that the city get fined. CM noted to
discuss with CR&R city should get credit.
Ayres moved Shaw 2"d passes 4/0.
Consent Calendar
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4 Chris pulled
5.5 Conner pulled
5.6 Conner pulled
5.7
5.8
Chris moved shaw 2"d passed 4/0
5.4 — doesn't see this as routine item. Move approval but not on consent in
future passes 4/0
5.5 new subd along Sanderson between 7th & Esplanade. ? signalization
conditioned Habib
Conner Ayress passes 4/0
5.6 waterline project need on west side. Conner 12" Doesn't talk about size of
pipe, questioned parrallell pipe. Does incl potter road to ; based on
master plan today — sized for that.
Conner concerned about no. of homes planned and 12" won't fit. Habib will look
at master plan
Conner moved Chris 2"d passed 4/0
To RDA 8:48 Chris moved approve minutes Ayres 2nd passes 4/0 adj 8:59
CC Reports
6.1 Painting City Hall
Shaw suggest to cm a couple of mos ago looks, paint chipped, casements of
windows fading, cracks, loose tiles, initially thought RDA $ available that is not
the case. Would like support — to be proud of City Hall after spending $600,000
on main st
Conner front walk fixed — not go to bid — taped off dangerous. Cosentini safety
issue started today to get fixed.
Chris - ? different pots - brick & motar approx $600,000 in fund.
Conner — sale of hard assets and supposed to be used to purchase hard assets.
Direct staff to get $4,000. CM appropriation. Chris moved to direct bring back
options to get this work done Conner 2"d passes 4/0
Ayres soon as possible CM next mtg.
Recess 9:04 pm
PETITION TO RETAIN SAN JACINTO POLICE DEPARTMENT
We, the undersigned business owners, employees thereof, and/or residents of
San Jacinto, California, do certify and declare our desire to retain the San Jacinto
Police Department, a municipal agency, and the city of San Jacinto's only law
enforcement provider. We expressly reject its replacement with contract services by
the Riverside County Sheriffs Department, aka: RSO, or any other contracting law
enforcement agency.
4. ,..(4-
NAME
1.
2.
3. `14
5. c� I
1`•
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
2.60L
10.
1
2.1/ 9 (a
13.
14
15.
16.
17.
18.
19
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: 2 SUBJECT:
DATE: _ 05
IN FAVOR: 0 NEUTRAL: R IN OPPOSITION: 0
_rM l:/1/
Name:
E"Y/
RepresentinglI✓
:, /�,.�^�/ l /S�j' r7
Address: 7d% . Ala / f/
City:
Telephone No.:
Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations
with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council.
When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate
time. Please make your presentation from the microphone.
HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START
OF THE MEETING.
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: Z • 0 SUBJECT: I Yk
DATE: :L;/ %
IN FAVOR: ❑
Name: 7 k r`r-r AO'
NEUTRAL: 0 IN OPPOSITION: 0
Representing: ; 0,.e �ae/mo o
Address:_//4d7 / P
City: Telephone No.: Cf11� /d9
Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations
with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council.
When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate
time. Please make your presentation from the microphone.
HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START
OF THE MEETING.
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: "'/ SUBJECT:C-r'f ' rete1ec-': e%e""(140cerze//I(_.
DATE: c /5 /c'`�
IN FAVOR: ❑,, f( NEUTRAL: 0 IN OPPOSITION:
Name:_ �r �R ( flew, Lih
Representing:
Address: J/) /2e't/
City: 5/ii/Y V/Iz'r/L/�1,7
Telephone No.:
Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations
with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council.
When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate
time. Please make your presentation from the microphone.
HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START
OF THE MEETING.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: , ,
DATE: 6'4
IN FAVOR: ❑ NEUTRAL: 0 IN OPPOSITION: ❑
Name: !Fb_n i /2 T . 0 ± Ar
Representing. S
Address: to �5 — E "' 5/e2 Q 7s
a Telephone No.: 62 s1 '(57�
City:
REQUEST TO SPEAK
SUBJECT:
Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations
with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council.
When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate
time. Please make your presentation from the microphone.
HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START
OF THE MEETING.
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: SUBJECT:
DATE: ,� f
IN FAVOR: 0 NEUTRAL: 0 IN OPPOSITION: 0
Name
Representing:-L.
Address:
City:
Telephone No.:
�%
Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations
with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council.
When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate
time. Please make your presentation from the microphone.
HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START
OF THE MEETING.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE: -g0512
REQUEST TO SPEAK
SUBJECT: A1071 rij4iW, vl?, n.-4—
IN FAVOR: ❑ NEUTRAL: ,d' IN OPPOSITION: 0
Name: H N ^Q
Representing:
Address: _ i r`�e ki i
City: Q N Qeo.ty1D Telephone No.: (q-C112_
Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations
with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council.
When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate
time. Please make your presentation from the microphone.
HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START
OF THE MEETING.
�-T
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #: 2 �C7 SUBJECT: `y G2A4)2 //
DATE: ` O -D
IN F,A(QR ❑ NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION:
i
Name: ��iLq:�r.fJ1�1X ,I V�tc4 L
Representing:
Address: (0-7k 1/ Cert4,1
City: --te;t" Q1 ci254u Telephone No.: -1 ? c)—0 i 6 d
Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations
with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council.
When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate
time. Please make your presentation from the microphone.
HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START
OF THE MEETING.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #:
DATE:
—IN IN 0
Name: V (7,1 �
Representing: /76j ft(//n 1 -4 Qk CIP
Address: /// aa7
City:Gft� I �`f.✓
REQUEST TO SPEAK
Z ,0 SUBJECT:7Ry__
P po'ri
IN OPPOSITION:
1)
NEUTRAL: 0
Telephone No.: 63 7 7 fi
Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations
with more than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council.
When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate
time. Please make your presentation from the microphone.
HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE START
OF THE MEETING.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FEBRUARY 5, 2004
Immediately Following the Regular City Council Meeting
San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room
2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California
1. ORGANIZATION
1.1 Call to Order
1.2 Roll Call
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
3. PUBLIC HEARING:
Now is the time for the public to address the Agency on any subject not listed on the agenda. Any
person may address the Agency on any subject pertaining to Redevelopment Agency business not listed on the
Agenda during this portion of the Meeting. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person
desiring to address the Agency Directors.
4. CITY DEPARTMENTS
None
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion
by Agency Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to
the motion unless members of the Redevelopment Agency, staff or the public requests a specified
item be removed and/or discussed.
Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the
Agency Chairman; state their name, address and the consent calendar item number. Speakers
should limit comments to three (3) minutes.
5.1 January 22, 2004 Regular Meeting Minutes / Approve / Agency
Secretary
Redevelopment Agency Agenda
February 5, 2004
Page 2 of 2
6. CHAIRPERSON / MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS
None
7. OPEN SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS
CLOSED SESSION
None
8. ADJOURNMENT
1, Do,tot4 Leffoubuvr.d. Sec/teem/o e Saw Paebteo A'edeoelotiffteat >49ege4, do 4w-4 ce.,tgey titat 1 awed to
th44 ted Ole-90449 alegda tite 30a da# Pwaaiui, 2004, 44 lefaoled 4 ea,.
- 6 ,1
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
JANAURY 22, 2004, 9:13 p.m.
San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room
2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California
1. ORGANIZATION
1.1 Call to Order
Chairman Jim Ayres called the Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment
Agency to order at 9:13 p.m.
1.2 Roll Call
Present: Jim Ayres, Chris Carlson-Buydos, Ken Shaw, Dale
Stubblefield
Absent: Jim Conner
2. PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
3. PUBLIC HEARING:
None
4. CITY DEPARTMENTS
In accordance with Director unanimous consensus this item was added to
the 1/22/04 RDA Agenda.
4.1 Façade Enhancement Loan Program for the Downtown Zone /
Approve / Community Development Director
M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve the Façade Enhancement Loan
Program with an outreach program and or a surgical mailing. Motion
carried 4/0.
Ayes: Carlson-Buydos, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres
Redevelopment Agency Minutes
January 22, 2004
Page 2 of 2
Nays:
Absent:
Abstain:
None
Conner
None
5. CONSENT CALENDAR
5.1 January 8, 2004 Regular Meeting Minutes / Approve / Agency
Secretary
M/S/C (Carlson-Buydos / Stubblefield) moved to approve the Agenda Item 5.1 as
submitted. Motion carried 4/0.
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Abstain:
Carlson-Buydos, Shaw, Stubblefield, Ayres
None
Conner
None
6. CHAIRPERSON / MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS
None
7. OPEN SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS
CLOSED SESSION
None
8. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business coming before the Agency, Chairman Ayres adjourned the
meeting at 9:16 p.m.
San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency
by Jim Ayres, Chairman
ATTEST:
Dorothy L. Chouinard, Agency Secretary