HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 4/18/1995DATE:
TIME:
PLACE:
AGENDA
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND
THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
April 18, 1995
7:30 P.M.
COMMUNITY CENTER
625 SOUTH PICO
SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
Roll Call
Prayer of Invocation - Pastor William Bell
Pledge of Allegiance
2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS
7(id dr).'
Any person may address the Council on any subject pertaining to city business not
listed on the agenda, during this portion of the meeting. A limitation of three (3)
minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the Council.
4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be
enacted by one motion by the City Council in the form listed.
• c
There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless
members of the City Council, staff or the public requests specified items to be removed
and/or discussed.
1
r
E
Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come forward, upon
invitation of the Mayor, state their name, address and the Consent Calendar item
number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes.
5.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 21, 1995
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
March 21, 1995, as presented.
5.2 Minutes of S ecial Meetin of March 28 1995
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of
March 28, 1995, as presented.
5.3 Minutes of Special Meeting of March 28, 1995
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of
March 28, 1995, as presented.
5.4 Warrant Register
RECOMMENDATION: Approve warrant numbers 40133 through 40244
dated April 15, 1995 in the amount of $487,322.45 and Payroll check
numbers 4981 through 5059 dated March 31, 1995.
5.5 Claim- Soboba Springs Country Club - File #JS 95-15
RECOMMENDATION: Reject the claim as recommended by the claims
adjustor, pursuant to Government Code Section 913.
5.6 Claim - Randy Butler - File #JS 95-16
RECOMMENDATION: Reject the claim as recommended by the claims
adjustor, pursuant to Government Code Section 913.
5.7 Coachella Valley Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CVJ PIA1 Agreement
Amendment
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 95- amending the Joint
Powers Agreement, allowing the authority to terminate CVAG'S role as
administrator.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT POWERS
AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT POWERS
INSURANCE AUTHORITY
2
5.8 Auditing Services for Fiscal Year 1994-95
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the proposal from Conrad & Associates
for Fiscal Year 1994-95 for auditing services in the amount of $27,235.00.
5.9 Adoption of Bid Procedures for the City of San Jacinto
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the bid procedures of the City of Hemet to
allow the City of San Jacinto to utilize their pricing to purchase computer
equipment for the City.
5.10 Wildland Fire Protection Agreement
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 95- establishing an
agreement for Wildland Fire Protection with the California Department of
Forestry and Fire Protection.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
ESTABLISHING AN AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION AND THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO FOR THE PROVISION OF WILDLAND FIRE PROTECTION IN CERTAIN
AREAS OF THE NEWLY ADOPTED ANNEXATION NO. 66 FOR PERIOD APRIL 1,
1995 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1996
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by: Seconded by: to approve consent calendar
items 5.1 through 5.10 and adopt Resolution No. 95- through Resolution No. 95-
6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
6.1 Appeal of Plannino Commission Decision on CUP 3-94 - McNabb
Applicant: B & D Enterprises - The San Jacinto Marketplace
Location: The 3.8 acre north parking lot of Mt. San Jacinto College.
RECOMMENDATION: Affirm or Overturn the Planning Commission
decision. Should the Council overturn the Planning Commission decision,
the City Council shall; adopt a Negative Declaration pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act and Resolution No. 1348, as
amended; grant CUP 3-94, subject to Findings of Fact and conditions of
Approval attached hereto and made a part herein.
3
7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS
7.1 Update on Cinco De Mayo - Hults
RECOMMENDATION: Receive oral report and provide direction to staff,
as appropriate.
7.2 Request for Proposals for Adaptive Reuse of the Mark Twain Memorial
Bridge - Evans
RECOMMENDATION: Receive for information and provide direction to
staff, as appropriate.
7.3 Closure of Warren Road for Repairs - Evans
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the closing of Warren Road to through
traffic between Ramona Expressway and Cottonwood Avenue for a one -
week period in late April or early May for repair of a 1,000 foot section
north of Cottonwood Avenue.
7.4 Soboba Village IV Update - Evans
RECOMMENDATION: Receive oral report and provide direction to staff,
as appropriate.
7.5 Planning Commission Responsibilities and Monthly Stipend - McNabb
RECOMMENDATION: Receive for information and provide direction to
staff, as appropriate.
7.6 Fee Deferral Program - McNabb
RECOMMENDATION: Receive for information and provide direction to
staff, as appropriate.
8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
8.1 Revised Groundwater Association Articles of Association - Oaks
8.2 Consideration of SCAG Membership - Oaks
9.0 CLOSED SESSION
9.1 Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956 - California Resources A enc vs. Cit
of San Jacinto
4
9.2 Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956 - California Farm Bureau vs. City of San
Jacinto
9.3 Conference with Labor Negotiator Richard M. Kreisler, Regarding San
Jacinto Police Officers' Association, San Jacinto Firefighters' Association
and Public Employees of Riverside County (PERC) Government Code
Section 54957.6
10.0 ADJOURNMENT
Motion by: Seconded: Action: to adjourn.
Vote:
I, Bob Wilson, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that I caused to be
posted the foregoing agenda this 13th day of March, 1995, as required by law.
aw..fl 1j
Deputy City Clerk
5
S A N
JACINTO
AG Dk 5L
Staff Report
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk
Via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: April 18, 1995
RE: Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 21, 1995
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 21,
1995, as presented.
MINUTES
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND
THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
MARCH 21, 1995
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
The Regular Meeting of the City Council was called to order at 7:34 P.M. by
Mayor Hafliger in the Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto,
California.
Present: Councilmembers Leahy, Oaks, Solorio, Williams and Mayor
Hafliger
Absent: None
Prayer of Invocation by Pastor Peter Edwards
Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Hafliger
2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
2.1 Light Rail Presentation
Kay Ceniceros, County Board of Supervisors, introduced Jack Reagan,
RCTC Executive Director. Stated the feasibility study was not yet
available for distribution but would be explained by Mr. Reagan. Stated
the line to the Hemet/San Jacinto area was still a part of the 1/2 cent
sales tax project. However, due to the expense and the recession of the
last couple years, had not been completed. Right-of-way had been
purchased on the line, which was a place holder that would be hard to
ignore. Mr. Reagan would address the issues of timing, what cities could
do to support the project, the status of financing issues and potential
station sites being looked at. He would explain the projections of the
1989 measure which was passed and what that would mean locally.
Jack Reagan, RCTC Executive Director, explained the study was being
performed by Boyle Engineering and showed overheads outlining his
presentation. Looking at the planning and engineering issues of the lines
evolution in the minds of the consultant; 1) the bus feeder system in the
first couple of years, expected in the next year or so, 2) the buses feeding
into the point of the metro link extension on the line. Suggested the first
1
March 21, 1995
segment to Alessandro, at the western edge of Moreno Valley. Then as
service extended out on the line, buses would continue in off peak hours,
with a tracking system. At full maturity, trains would operate at off peak
hours. Showed maps of the area, indicating the service links to downtown
Riverside, connecting to Highgrove, stopping around the University of
Riverside and then on to Alessandro. The second phase map would be to
Perris with stops at Alessandro and Ramona Expressway, with a feeder
delivering patronage to the rail system. At this point, it would not
necessarily be metro link, but self contained cars, assuming that the
opportunity and funding existed. As a shortcut they would prefer diesel
cars and connect to where Southern Pacific crossed and led to downtown.
The financial advantage of diesel, over metro link, is that as part of the
Southern California region, the authorized cost assigned to individual
agencies would be based on operating miles and the burden of overhead
so it would make more sense to have a local operating agency. It would
be cheaper and easier to provide more frequent peak hour service. The
showed a map extending service from Perris to Romoland, collecting
traffic from the southwest and Hemet/San Jacinto. Then showed a map
of an extension to Hemet Ryan Airport and terminating the final phase,
bringing a station to Hemet or San Jacinto, which the consultant was not
suggesting currently. It was assumed that implementation would have to
be phased in due to the funding shortages. They hoped that rail bonds
would be passed, because without them, full implementation was not
possible. The report would include illustrations on what a station might
look like, which would work for both metro and diesel. Then showed a
chart of patronage forecasts. The numbers were quite high compared to
those existing in 1994 in other counties. The initial study estimated 1,500
trips and subsequent studies were as high as 3,000-5,260. If there were
saturation on the line, along with other discounted fares, there was the
potential for high growth in the corridor and they could expect severe
congestion. Riverside County could expect growth in the future and did
not anticipate a lot of money for highway infrastructure. They felt rail
patronage would be good in the decades ahead. There was another
study to look at freight service on the line. Proposed to use the rails for
freight and continuation of service and extension of the metro link, with
limits. That was what was termed light rail. Diesel would fit that service,
and that of clean fuel consumption. Freight service was in trouble
because Santa Fe had deferred maintenance for decades and it would
take an estimated $4 million currently for speeds up to 25 MPH, and
about $5 million, $4.6 for Highgrove to Perris and the remainder from
Perris to the end of the line. The study looked at the existing shippers,
March 21, 1995
and assuming they found the capital source for deferred maintenance, the
operations might see a positive return of $100,000. Unless there were
more compelling reasons, RCTC should not assume responsibility for
freight service. When right-of-way was acquired, Santa Fee stated they
would not abandon it for five years, and when passenger service was
initiated, they would contribute to maintenance of the line at $400,000 per
year. The best strategy to trigger their contribution would be with the first
extension of the passenger line to Alessandro. RCTC was working with
commerce to require Santa Fe to continue freight service on the line.
Currently they served to the end of the line at Agri -Empire, which was
infrequent. That needed to be maintained and the City could assist with
that, and whatever steps in the interim to get the extension of service on
the line. Did not foresee funding soon, the service all the way out,
because of the quantum investment needed. The report was still in the
draft form and had some policy concerns. The City Council could
consider if incremental service was something the City could support.
Mr. Reagan, in responding to Council inquiries, advised that the ridership
was anticipated to be the ultimate destination of Los Angeles and Orange
Counties, early in the morning. Some would not be willing to get up early
to ride. With self motorized units, the composition and trip purpose could
be varied, with Riverside area destinations more so than commute trips to
Los Angeles and Orange. There would be competition with RTA for
funding. The sources of transportation funding were limited and the
Commission would have to make judgements on how much resource to
each, so the phasing of the line may be in part with input from RTA on the
demand, patronage and economics of bus versus rail. What RTA was
looking at was a maintenance and transfer facility in Perris, extending
service to that area. Advised the existing tracks were single and would
have to be replaced so passenger and freight could pass. The cost for
improvements was somewhere in the neighborhood of $40 million, but
could be done for less. At $250,000 per mile they could gain 15 MPH if
speeds were kept under 60 MPH. If it were phased, they would hopefully
access some funds from congestion management, clean air mitigation,
discretionary surface funds, and federal funds, all of which would be in
competition with other projects, depending on priorities. Addressing
Council concern for the improvements needed at the Esplanade crossing,
suggested the rail companies never volunteer. He had heard of
placement of a red sign in the middle of a track prohibiting passing until
the rail company responded. It required diligence and keeping a watch. If
the rail company submitted an application to the Interstate Commerce
3
March 21, 1995
Commission, the City could protest. Heard the Orange Empire Rail
Museum had expressed some interest in assumption of freight service
between Perris and San Jacinto, and some places had put on a road
service fee. Those may work out to be mutually beneficial and would take
more study. The $100,000 expected freight revenue was based on the
existing and was a conservative estimate. They could project growth in
business and the forecast could be higher, but it was speculative.
Mr. Reagan, addressing fees in other areas, reviewing the overall
congestion management projects of the County, in the past, action was
taken to designate RCTC as the responsible agency. Basically they were
to track congestion on designated systems, primarily state highways and
those that impact that system. If the service got worse they were required
to develop a plan to solve those problems. They had been working with
WRCOG to help implement a project and work with the local jurisdictions
on the rate of development. They must have traffic impact studies and
gather annually, statistics. They had identified only one situation in the
County, the southwest area. The gas tax increase was apportioned
based on legislation in 1989, and at first, if it was not used in the effort, it
would revert back to the state. The law had since changed and it now
came back to the County to reinvest in the regional system. They would
be looking at that with WRCOG to determine what would be worth the
effort. They were proud of the Lambs Canyon widening. It was one of the
few projects of that magnitude, with the help of a local agency. Expected
completion in the fall of 1996. As for the missing link of the Ramona
Expressway, he did not have an answer. They were looking at the
priorities set for Measure A funds. The survey dated back to 1986-88,
and they may want to reallocate resources. The difficulty would be to get
other local agencies to buy into the project. There would be a survey of
voter sensitivity on a transportation override to provide funding for transit.
For those without a large share of Measure A, it would be a way to keep
state improvement projects on schedule. The state announced it was
broke and had a $5 billion shortfall. Hence, those projects expected to go
on line now and in the next few years would be deferred beyond the turn
of the century.
Ms. Ceniceros saw the plans as optimistic, peppered with caution. The
initial estimates included all proceeds in a low year. The 1990
calculations called for $1.4 billion, but thought $800 million was closer to
the truth. Thought some of the projects showed Hemet and San Jacinto
were treated well, based on the population basis for distribution of funding
March 21, 1995
While other areas that lacked population, they tended to be included in
the Riverside Metropolitan area. She had heard at RCTC, other cities
mentioned the Ramona Expressway gap, and as suffering from the
longest cul-de-sac. That was a blessing, as well as a challenge.
Cautioned, however, that they would have to look at where the funds
would go community and county wide.
The city would continue communications with the County on the City's
perspective.
2.2 Recognition of Dave Ver Plank, Planning Commissioner 1985-1994
Mayor Hafliger made the presentation.
2.3 Recognition of Anna Vega, Finance Director January 1991 - March 1995
City Manager Easter told of Ms. Vega's future and past service.
Mayor Hafliger made the presentation.
3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS
John Padilla, referring to an article in the Press Enterprise on March 5, and
reading from same, that discussed Chicano studies and the historical
relationship with the legal judicial system, and promotion of a dual standard of
purpose to perpetuate control of Mexican Americans. The conflict was evident
between them and police. The relationships were characterized with open
hostility and violence, and was like a military force in the barrio. There was joint
oppression by the media and schools, of Chicanos, with the reinforcement of
negative images and reinforcing manipulation of the system against Chicanos,
and the abuse of control used against them. Chicanos were not more violent, as
perceived, because the lack the power to control the media, symbols and gang
violence. Needed to help young people deal with and counteract the various
forms of control within the community, with the Chicano studies. Mr. Padilla then
began verbal attacks on members of staff.
Mayor Hafliger, in accordance with the Rules and Procedures on decorum,
advised he would not allow Mr. Padilla to make any further derogatory remarks
reflecting on individuals.
March 21, 1995
Mr. Padilla persisted.
Mayor Hafliger pointed out again the prohibition of his remarks, and noted that
he was not even a resident of the community. Noted the law enforcement of the
city laid their lives on the line to protect the community and the remarks were out
of line.
Mr. Padilla attempted to speak again.
Mayor Hafliger called for the next speaker.
Jim Smedley stated that he was speaking as a private citizen, and not a member
of the Chamber of Commerce Board. He then alleged a violation of the Brown
Act by an individual member of Council, reading from a prepared statement,
which was submitted to the City Clerk. He requested an investigation.
Dane Kimmel, Representing Helen Burrows & 486 West Second Street, and the
Listing Broker of that property, outlined the course of ownership. Noted that Ms.
Burrows had maintained the first trust deed, but following fire damage in 1992,
the owner had not put the insurance proceeds into repairs, and the property
became five years in arrears on taxes. Hence, a demolition process had begun
by the City and Ms. Burrows did not understand it, or her right to appeal. The
property was listed by one of his agents and was in escrow. The prospective
buyer became aware of the situation when contacting the City about permits for
repairs, and was still willing to purchase and bring the property up to code.
Requested the Council reverse the decision for demolition.
Council requested information on the status of the demolition and the legal
ramifications. Noted that City Attorney Cox had a conflict of interest on the
matter and Community Development Director McNabb would make the
presentation.
Mr. McNabb presented an outline of the process followed by staff, meeting all
the legal requirements, and the failure of the property owner to exercise the right
of appeal. The sixty day expiration occurred last week, and the City's official
stance would be that lacking the appeal, staff must proceed with demolition.
Staff had discussed improvement permits with an individual and also explained
to Mr. Kimmel that staff could not overrule a Council decision. Noted the matter
was not on the agenda and no formal action could be taken by Council. If
desired, Council could instruct staff to bring the matter back on a future agenda.
As for the liabilities, noted that staff had followed the codes of the State, there
6
March 21, 1995
were no liabilities on the part of the City.
Council consensus that staff bring the matter back for consideration on the
March 28, 1995, agenda.
Fred Rodriguez thanked Council and the Mayor for their support of the Police
Department, for what was sometimes a thankless job, but at times like this made
it worthwhile.
Council consensus to move item 8.1 of the agenda forward for consideration at
this time.
8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
8.1 Approval of City -to -City Recycling Contract
Councilmember Oaks stated that a lot of hard work and effort went into
the proposal in just a short time, and commended the staff of both cities.
Hoped this would develop into future cooperative efforts between cities. It
was well thought out and something all could live with.
Councilmember Solorio stated his opinion did not reflect on the work and
effort of the staff of both cities. Did not feel as positive on the proposal
and the bottom line had not yet been met. None the less, it did not mean
it was not workable.
Greg Oganesian requested his speaking time be given to Mr. Jeglin.
Marvin Jeglin, Representing OK Associates, noted that the current waste
contract with San Jacinto and OK Associates, contained a Section 6,
which was an option for recycling. He believed it was in the best interest
of the citizens of San Jacinto to adopt that option, as opposed to the City
to City Agreement. Section 6 of the present waste contract provided for a
cost of $1.58 per resident for once a week pickup of recyclables, a 50/50
revenue sharing with the city, no investment by the city, and the manual
collection of recyclables. The comparison of the current proposal
between the cities, the cost would be more for residents; 72 cents to
$1.13, using figures staff provided for mobile homes, that being more than
the $1.58 of OK Associates. For individual private homes $1.38-$1.91,
depending which set of schedules, compared to the $1.58 Section 6
option. Comparing the service, the City to City Agreement would be every
7
March 21, 1995
other week, as opposed to once a week for recyclables and an automated
system. Bottom line, the City to City Agreement did not address the ability
of the system to control contamination, and hoped to defray the cost, i.e.,
workmen's compensation, which should not be the City's responsibility.
When a contaminated load got to the termination point and the receiver
discovered contamination, the City would have to pay for those loads, and
they would not receive the income anticipated. The capital outlay and
expense in the City to City would be $.5 million for equipment acquisition,
extra insurance and extra expense, resulting in a $1/2 million budget and
the City going into the recycling business. If Section 6 were adopted the
City would not have a year of those expenses and would have received a
50/50 share of revenue generated by recycling. Section 6 made the best
sense for the citizens and urged Council to vote no on the City to City
proposal and request OK Associates to implement Section 6 under the
terms of the contract set therein.
Joyce Marshall, WRCOG, in responding to Council inquiries, advised
there was a 50 pound limit per container, but no limitation on the number
of containers for green waste. Explained that contamination would be
controlled by the driver physically looking in the container being dumped.
In areas where this occurred they would do public education. Perhaps
Hemet could address the issues better.
Bob Fami, City of Hemet, advised they currently had less than one
percent contamination due to public education. The operators would hold
to strict guidelines and each load would be checked for contamination. If
found, the driver would know the proximity and literature would be
distributed. There were also cameras on the truck, one on the back and
one in the hopper. With that monitoring, they would be able to keep the
contamination level down. If there were further contamination, the
resident would be contacted and the can tagged. They know when it
would be a repeat because of a log kept on the truck. If the contamination
continued and the can is tagged again, the recyclables would be left in the
container and have the resident would have to contact the City.
Councilmember Leahy indicated she was a strong supporter of OK
Associates and would have liked to work out a contract, but were unable
to do so. Had to reconsider the City to City Agreement, and now they
were in a position the City must go forward. This would offer the
opportunity and would require some investment and fees, but it was not
yet final. There would be a hearing in April to set the rates and Council
March 21, 1995
would have to add other city costs, but this was the way to go at the
present time.
Councilmember Williams indicated he favored the City to City Agreement
from the start. He appreciated the efforts of both city staffs and the
subcommittee. Identified three issues; 1) the combined overhead
between the cities at 30% of the total cost, and urged that staff monitor
the administrative overhead expenditures in hopes of lowering them to a
more reasonable amount, so the rate could be reduced at a later time.
Would like to see a savings on the program, through efficiency, by use of
San Jacinto's staff, 2) this was another unfunded mandate with the
additional actions needed by staff, i.e., the SRRE, which was estimated at
20-50 cents per customer, and preferred the lowest cost possible to meet
the minimum requirements of AB 939, and 3) the depreciation at 100%
was pushing $600,000 over seven years. Really did not see San Jacinto,
in seven years, buying trucks at cash value, and thought the City should
continue to lease. Needed to depreciate those assets for unexpected
incidents to keep the program moving and not come back for a rate
increase. He would support a 50% depreciation and keeping the cost at a
reasonable level.
Councilmember Leahy agreed with the 50% depreciation, because it
would not be expected they would buy new trucks in seven years.
Inquired if staff had found another insurance option with a lower deduction
and premium.
City Manager Easter advised the $16,000 premium was included in the
budget, with payment to the CVJPIA. It was assumed the additional
coverage would bring down the deductible. There would be more
information that issue in 30-60 days, but the additional cost would remain
constant. Most likely, the City would continue under the present
insurance. She had discussed the matter with Hemet's Finance Director,
who was researching the matter as to what was most beneficial. Council
would need to decide if they wanted the exposure of $125,000, or make
an evaluation once the quotes are in and weigh the lower exposure. The
attorneys were also working out what share San Jacinto would have if an
accident claim were filed on trucks operating in San Jacinto. Staff would
report back to Council on the lower deductible and the liability share.
Councilmember Oaks agreed with the 50% depreciation, that it was a
reasonable risk for the future if an emergency arose.
March 21, 1995
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by
Councilmember Oaks to approve the "City -to -City Agreement" for a Joint
Recycling Program, with the attached City -to -City Recycling Service
Proposal, as well as the other points referenced in the Staffs
Recommendation Section, with the selection of a 50% depreciation.
Motion carried on a 4-1 vote with Councilmember Solorio dissenting.
At the hour of 8:55 P.M. Council recessed.
At the hour of 9:10 P.M. reconvened with all members present, except Councilmembers
Solorio and Williams
At the hour of 9:10 P.M. convened the Redevelopment Agency and Industrial
Development Authority in joint session with the City Council for consideration of the
following items:
4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
None
5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Staff requested item 5.12 be continued to April 4, 1995, and to comment on item
5.11.
City Manager Easter, in response to Council inquiry, advised that with regard to
item 5.11, the delegation would be to the City Manager or both the City Manager
and Finance Director. The amount and legitimacy of the claim would have to be
validated by PERS, per their calculations. Council would not have input on that
issue.
At the hour of 9:12 P.M. Councilmembers Solorio and Williams returned to Council
chambers.
City Attorney Cox noted the contract on item 5.6 would be amended to include
the current year as its term, to clarify the start and end dates.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember
Oaks to approve the consent calendar as presented with the exception of item
5.12, which would be continued to April 4, 1995, and item 5.6 as the date was
amended. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote.
10
March 21, 1995
5.1 Minutes - Regular Meeting of February 21, 1995
Approved the minutes for the Regular Meeting of February 21, 1995, as
presented.
5.2 Minutes - Special Meeting of February 27, 1995
Approved the minutes for the Special Meeting of February 27, 1995, as
presented.
5.3 Minutes of Special Meeting of February 28, 1995
Approved the minutes for the Special Meeting of February 28, 1995, as
presented.
5.4 Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 7, 1995
Approved the minutes for the Regular Meeting of March 7, 1995, as
presented.
5.5 Warrant Register
Approved warrant numbers 39867 through 40003, dated March 15, 1995,
in the amount of $374,254.36, and Payroll check numbers 4799 through
4886, dated March 3, 1995.
5.6 Contract Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District Use of City Park
Facilities
Approved the Contract for Use of the Sallee Park and Rancho Park ball
fields from April 1, 1995 - August 31, 1995.
5.7 Contract Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District Pool Maintenance and
Operation
Approved the Contract for Sallee Park Pool Maintenance and Operation
from June 10, 1995 - September 12, 1995.
5.8 Riverside County Fire Department Operational Area Contract
Adopted Resolution No. 95-12, authorizing the City of San Jacinto to join
the Riverside County Operational Area to strengthen mutual coordination
in disaster planning; Adopted Resolution No. 95-13, approving the use of
the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) as the
management system to be utilized by San Jacinto for disaster
management; and approved the Operational Area Contract between the
County of Riverside and the City of San Jacinto.
March 21, 1995
RESOLUTION NO. 95-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE
OPERATIONAL AREA ORGANIZATION OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
RESOLUTION NO. 95-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARTICIPATION IN THE STANDARD EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
5.9 City -Wide Speed Study
Directed staff to prepare a City-wide speed zone study utilizing the
services of Counts Unlimited to perform the radar survey and Ben
Dobbins, Traffic Engineer, to prepare the report.
5.10 Tri-Party Contract - Edelbrock Industrial Development Bonds, Substitution
of Trustee
Acting in the capacity as the Industrial Development Authority approved
the Tri-Party Contract allowing the transfer of the trustee authority to
Harris Trust Savings Bank.
5.11 Delegation of Authority - Retirement Determinations
Adopted Resolution No. 95-14, delegating authority to the City Manager
and Finance Director to make Retirement Determinations under Section
21023(c) of the Government Code.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO THE CITY MANAGER AND FINANCE
DIRECTOR TO MAKE RETIREMENT DETERMINATIONS UNDER SECTION
21023(C) OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
5.12 Jordan and Shaver Apartment Conversion Architectural Design Contract
Continued matter to meeting of April 4, 1995.
12
March 21, 1995
5.13 Contract Addendum Subdivision Agreement Tract 24140-2 Interim Access
Ramona Expressway to Model Complex FN Development
(Summerchase Homes Development)
Approved Addendum to the Subdivision Agreement for Tract 24140-2.
5.14 Contract Special Counsel CFD No. 2 Foreclosure Proceedings
Approved the agreement for special counsel services for Mello -Roos Tax
foreclosure proceedings with Brown, Diven & Hentschke, cost not to
exceed $25,000, to be paid through Community Facilities District No. 2
funds.
At the hour of 9:14 P.M. adjourned the Industrial Development Authority and continued
acting in the capacity as the Redevelopment Agency and the City Council for the next
item on the agenda.
6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
6.1 Sale of Redevelopment Agency Land - Brown & Second Street
Senior Planner Hults made a presentation as contained in the staff report
on file with the City Clerk. Noted the handout with amendments.
Mayor Hafliger opened the public hearing.
There being no speakers wishing to present testimony, the public hearing
was closed.
City Manager Easter acknowledged the individuals present from Habitat
for Humanity.
Hal Brown introduced individuals present, and ready to begin work on the
Brown Street improvements. Responding to Council inquiries, they hoped
to break ground around April 15th. They were ready to submit five
families for consideration on the first two homes and there would be
another group for the third home. Identified the various groups ready to
work on the houses and the volunteers would be able to work the site six
days a week. Noted this was an example of how the private sector,
government and the public non-profit could work together for the good of
the community.
13
March 21, 1995
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by
Councilmember Williams, acting in their capacity as the Redevelopment
Agency and the City Council, to adopt Resolution No. 95-15, for the
approval of the sale of Redevelopment Agency Property, with findings;
and adopt Resolution No. RDA 95-2, for the approval of the sale of
Redevelopment Agency Property; and approve the Disposition and
Development Agreement, as amended, with Habitat for Humanity,
Hemet/San Jacinto, Inc. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-15
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
AUTHORIZING THE SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO CONVEY
REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE SAN JACINTO
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PURSUANT TO DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT
At the hour of 9:20 P.M. adjourned the Redevelopment Agency and continued acting in
the capacity as the City Council for the remainder of the agenda.
7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS
7.1 County Services Area (CSA) 152 Administrative Services Contract
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and Resolution
Setting Rates for the County Service Area
Public Works Director Evans made a presentation as contained in the
staff report on file with the City Clerk. This was the third attempt by staff
to gain approval on an agreement with the County of Riverside for the
assessment district to fund (NPDES) storm water runoff and set a
preliminary tax rate. San Jacinto joined the County as co-permittee, and
had been under the County permit since 1990. Previously the City
Attorney advised Council of the ramifications of non-compliance, including
the criminal penalties for willful non-compliance. At the prior meeting, with
less than a full Council, the vote was tied and the matter continued for
action with a full Council present.
14
March 21, 1995
Councilmember Williams noted this was a core issue, next to recycling, on
unfunded mandates which would place a burden on the community. With
limited funds, would like to see those funds used on more productive
avenues, such as public safety. He had talked to Congressman Bono's
staff, who provided material from which he read an excerpt beginning
Page 5, Municipalities paragraph 2. A full copy was submitted to the City
Clerk for the record. The essence of the excerpt was that after some
delays of implementation for small cities (under 100,000 population), that
after the exemption expired there were no, and have been no, regulations
in place, making it difficult for small cities to obtain a permit. EPA officials
stated they would take no enforcement actions against such cities. It did
go on to say that individuals could take action. Further, Mr. Williams had
spoke with the County, who indicated there was still confusion over what
was going on, and the Director of EPA had discretion to designate certain
areas, regardless of population.
City Manager Easter stated that because San Jacinto was a part of the
Santa Ana Water Shed District, that all jurisdictions had been lumped
together in a designation which required the permits.
Mr. Williams felt it was not clear how that happened, but still was opposed
to seeing something such as this forced on the community. Mr. Bono's
office would be following up on the matter after the meeting, and would
provide a definitive answer for exemption, and perhaps end the
assessment.
Mayor Hafliger indicated he had also been in contact with Mr. Bono's
office. They indicated this was an issue at the top of their list. There
seemed to be support from his office and maybe some relief could be
obtained in the future so citizens would not have to continue to pay for
these unfounded and unfunded mandates. Urged Council to keep Mr.
Bono informed on any changes on the political environmental issues.
Councilmember Oaks indicated he had talked to Mr. Bono's office
regarding unfunded mandates. They were sympathetic and promised
action and expected the City to be moved out from under the unfunded
mandate (NPDES).
Mr. Evans pointed out, that even though the city did not meet the
population criteria, it did not protest the Santa Ana Region permit in 1990.
As such the City needed to comply with the conditions of the permit.
15
March 21, 1995
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by
Councilmember Oaks, to approve the Administrative Services Contract
between Riverside County and the City of San Jacinto, which would
enable the County to formally assess and collect City CSA 152 parcel
charges and revenue for the NPDES program; and adopt Resolution No.
95-16, Setting the Rates for County Service Area (CSA) 152 to Fund
City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit
Program. Motion carried on a 3-2 vote with Councilmember Williams and
Mayor Hafliger dissenting.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA SETTING THE RATES FOR COUNTY SERVICE AREA 152 - SAN
JACINTO TO FUND CITY'S NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION
SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT PROGRAM
At the hour of 9:35 P.M. Council recessed.
At the hour of 9:50 P.M. Council reconvened with Mayor Hafliger absent.
7.2 Policy and Procedures for Naming and Renaming City Facilities
City Manger Easter advised that staff had looked at other city's policies
and submitted the policy as presented. Requested input from Council on
modifications, and if minor, to adopt the policy.
Extensive Council discussion resulted in the following modifications:
1. Page 1, first paragraph, add "events" in addition to "City facilities".
Add "or groups" after "individuals".
2. Page 1, Section A, add "or renaming" after naming, and after
"park" add "or previously designated street".
3. Page 1, Criteria Section A, delete "long term" and "the well being of
society and specifically, to", and add "sports" as one of the
contribution areas.
4. Page 1, Criteria Section B, change the word "dead" to "deceased",
and add "ever" after "have" in the first line.
5. Page 1, Criteria Section C, replace "publicly" with "generally",
comma after acknowledged, and reverse the words "proof' and
"documented".
16
March 21, 1995
6. Page 1, Criteria, add Section D "Naming or renaming of any City
facility will not involve renaming a previously named facility without
investigation of the existing criteria for the current name. No facility
will be renamed if the original name was based upon honoring
notable figures of the past."
7. Page 1, Procedures First Section, add "or renamed" after "named".
8. Page 1, Procedures, Section A, add "Need to understand why the
facility/street was named in the first place".
9. Page 2, Procedures Section B, add 'Two members of the Chamber
of Commerce".
10. Page 2, Procedures Section B, Second Paragraph, change "work"
to "evaluations", and "dissolved" to "disband".
11. Add, "Objections should be submitted in writing to the ad hoc
committee or City Council".
City Attorney Cox, in response to Council inquiry, advised that the
committee, since formed by action of the Council, would have to comply
with the provisions of the Brown Act.
Council Consensus that staff bring back the modified policy at the April 4,
1995, meeting, under the consent calendar.
7.3 Update on First Street Target Area
Community Development Director McNabb made a presentation as
contained in the report handed out at the meeting, and on file with the City
Clerk. In response to Council inquiries, advised the zoning had not
recently changed and the keeping of farm animals had not been
grandfathered in. There was some evidence of cock fighting. The types
of complaints regarding the chickens had to do with their slaughtering and
the remains being discharged in the street. Seemed the main focus of
concern was with crime, public safety and flood control related issues.
Slight Council concern that the survey may have not solicited as
accurately the actual concerns of the neighbors, by the formulation and
format of the survey.
17
March 21, 1995
7.4 City Council Budget Amendment
City Manger Easter, in response to Council inquiries, advised they did not
know when asset seizure funds would be received, but there were some
in the pipeline and a $40,000 deficit was anticipated. During the budget
process, they would be looking at the positions funded, and if not enough
funding were anticipated they would have to look potentially from the
general fund, if it were a Council priority. Other funding areas were
undetermined and staff would be meeting with the County in the next
week to ten days.
Police Chief Holmes advised that the asset seizure would repay the funds.
In response to Council inquiries, stated that historically INCA brought in
$175,000 per year, per agency. However, they were now operating under
new laws and they were unsure of the effects. Thought it would take
about 9-12 months, but had received $66,000 for the current year plus
that which was in reserve. The $40,000 was based on, if costs were the
same they would be $40,000 short of the $153,000 budgeted.
City Manager Easter noted it was hard to predict, having used funds from
prior years, how much money was in the pipeline that would go to defray
the deficit of more than $40,000.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by
Councilmember Oaks, to adopt Resolution No. 95-17, amending the
1994-95 fiscal year budget, and authorize the advancement of $40,000 to
the Asset Forfeiture Fund. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Mayor
Hafliger absent.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE 1994-95 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET
8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
8.1 Approval of City -to -City Recycling Contract
Matter was addressed earlier on the agenda.
18
March 21, 1995
Councilmember Leahy advised, that although the new senior fair housing rules
brought some relief, there was one clause where problems were uncertain. One
issue was certification, which could be self certification, if requirements were
met. They still did not have the seal of approval from HUD or a judicial branch
and were still subject to claims against them. Until there was a ruling from HUD,
they could not eliminate claims and the worry status.
Councilmember Oaks attended a groundwater meeting at the Indian Reservation
and discussed their proposal. All he could comment on was essentially that the
non-indian side would go off and review proposals and come up with differences
and what they felt were technical facts. Stated it was going to be a long drawn
out affair, and questioned who actually got involved in the suit, noting that only
the names of Metropolitan, EMWD and Hemet (not the City) were listed. He
would like to bring the matter up in another forum and discuss the matter in
closed session to determine the City's position.
At the hour of 10:30 P.M. Council recessed.
At the hour of 10:45 P.M. Council reconvened for closed session, with all members
present, except Mayor Hafliger, pursuant to the following:
9.0 CLOSED SESSION
9.1 Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956 - California Resources Agency vs. City
of San Jacinto
9.2 Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956 - California Farm Bureau vs. City of San
Jacinto
9.3 Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title: City Manager) Pursuant
to Government Code Section 54957
9.4 Public Employment (Title: Assistant to the City Manager) Pursuant to
Government Code Section 54957
At the hour of 11:18 P.M. Council reconvened in open session, with all members
present, except Mayor Hafliger, and announced no reportable action being taken.
19
March 21, 1995
10.0 ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned. The
hour of adjournment being 11:19 P.M.
Submitted by
Bob Wilson, City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
20
Approved by
Mayor
5 A N
JACINTO
A �:..d„W DA `T --
r
Staff Report
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Laurie Mora, Deputy City Clerk
Via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: April 18, 1995
RE: Minutes of Special Meeting of March 28, 1995
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of March 28, 1995,
as presented.
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND
THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
MARCH 28, 1995
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
The Special Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order by
Mayor Pro -Tern Solorio at 6:00 P.M. in the Community Center, 625 S. Pico, San
Jacinto, California.
Present: Councilmembers Leahy, Oaks, Williams, Mayor Pro -Tern
Solorio
2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None
3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
None
5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
None
6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS
None
8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
None
At the hour of 6:01 P.M. Council convened in Closed Session pursuant to the following:
9.0 CLOSED SESSION
9.1 Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title: City Manager) Purusant
to Government Code Section 54957
At the hour of 7:15 P. M. Council reconvened in open session, with all members
present, and announced no reportalbe action being taken.
10.0 ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned. The hour of
adjournment being 7:16 P.M.
Submitted by
Bob Wilson, City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
Approved
Mayor
2
S A N
JACINTO
Staff Report
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk
Via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: April 18, 1995
RE: Minutes of Special Joint Meeting of March 28, 1995
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Joint Meeting of March 28,
1995, as presented.
MINUTES
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND
SAN JACINTO PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 28, 1995
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
The Special Joint Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council and the San Jacinto
Planning Commission was called to order by Mayor Pro Tern Solorio at 7:36
P.M. in the Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, California.
Present: Councilmembers Leahy, Oaks, Williams and Mayor Pro Tern
Solorio
Commissioners Ayres, Hixson, Meadows, Perry and Chairman
Duistermars
Absent: Council Seat Vacant
Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Pro Tern Solorio
2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None
3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
None
5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
None
6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
March 28, 1995
7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS
7.1 Expectations of Planning Commission
Community Development Director McNabb advised that the Planning
Commission had come up with the list of issues for discussion and
suggested they address those issues.
Chairman Duistermars stated the Planning Commission was looking for
direction from the Council on the kind of building going on in the City, an
evaluation of what the Planning Commission had done, and if they were
going in the proper direction? How did Council want projects handled,
which had income potential but did not easily fit in the General Plan? Did
Council want to weigh heavier those projects which could bring industrial
to the area, or adhere strictly to the General Plan?
Councilmember Oaks advised the Council had been meeting to establish
goals and plans as a Council. He thought the main consideration was to
try to come up with a balanced community that provided jobs and places
to live. With that in mind, felt the main thrust would be to emphasize
clean industrial development of the City.
Councilmember Leahy thought one factor was to be patient and not settle
for less than the valley was entitled to, whether it was industrial or
housing. The City should set the priorities and policies and let
development come to the City and not force the issue. The priorities were
not yet in black and white, but would be forthcoming and shared with the
Planning Commission.
Councilmember Williams felt that not forcing development was another
way of saying, not to force premature development, whether it was
industrial or commercial. However, to be flexible. If a user did come to
the community, the City should do what they could to find a fit for them
within the City. Clearly, if they were a job producer or revenue generator,
the Council had been consistent in the past year by streamlining the
permit process for them. Thought it would be appropriate to schedule a
workshop with the City Council and Planning Commission to discuss
some issues. Council had been meeting to set goals and priorities and
two things came up again and again. 1) The quality of life that attracted
the residents to San Jacinto; and 2) a question as to the long range
planning vision for San Jacinto. Would like a workshop within the next 60
days, utilizing a speaker from another conference Council had attended.
2
March 28, 1995
Mayor Pro Tern Solorio agreed with the points which had been made. At
their previous meetings Council had discussed the various issues. A
priority was to stick with the important aspects and maintain flexibility
where possible and not undermine the work of the Planning Commission
that Council appointed. Council needed to believe in the Planning
Commission's purpose. Agreed with the workshop idea. Felt it would
benefit both bodies, and especially for newer members. The streamlined
process was not new, but unfortunately the economic climate had not
allowed the business community to take advantage. Needed to maintain
the same direction and plan for the future, instead of reacting to it.
Commissioner Ayres was encouraged with the attitude shown. Felt it
would not be good for San Jacinto to be stagnant, or sit back and let
Hemet and other cities pass San Jacinto by, and not be competitive.
Commissioner Hixson stated he had been on the Commission for many
years, and believed that by being appointed by the City Council, the
Council needed to lead the Commission, but they never felt too much
leadership and the Commission felt somewhat neglected in that area.
Thought the City Council could enlighten them more on what was
expected.
Consensus of both bodies to have a joint workshop, at the college, on
Monday, May 8, 1995, from 8:00 A.M to Noon, and possibly May 9th, if
the facilities were not available, and dependent upon the availability of the
speaker.
City Manager Easter advised that staff would send the final goals and
objectives established by Council to both bodies, when complete.
7.2 Raise in Stipend to Planning Commission Members
Community Development Director McNabb made a presentation as
contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk.
Council consensus to continue the matter to the meeting of April 18, 1995,
at which time staff would present the statutory requirements for pay in,
comparable sized cities, and the job duties.
March 28, 1995
7.3 Housing Program Goals & Policies
Community Development Director McNabb made a presentation as
contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. Indicated this was
mainly a staff item but thought the Planning Commission may have some
comments. He thought there were some concerns relating to the RDA
Housing Programs and the way they had been formulated in the past.
Basically they were handled differently than private development projects.
In the case of private projects, developers would meet with staff with a
concept in mind, hire an engineer to design it and then go to the Planning
Commission for review, modification, etc. Some projects would also go to
the City Council, depending on the type of development, some cases go
to City Council With RDA projects, staff would bring it to the City Council
to establish a policy and the City would solicit a property owner and hire a
preliminary design consultant, and then present the purchse and design
concept to the City Council for approval. With the downtown area, and
less than 7200 square foot lots, approval would be needed from the
Planning Commission. However, with RDA projects the Planning
Commission did not get the opportunity for input on the initial design.
When the Commission reviewed these projects, they made changes that
were improvements on the design. However, Council had already been
sold on a design. A suggestion, to avoid any further occurrence, would be
to handle such projects in the same manner as the private sector,
contingent on approval by the Council, Planning Commission and
ordinance requirements. Gave an example, using the Brown Street
project, where the Planning Commission did not agree on the density. In
response to Council inquiries, advised the process was more interactive
at the present time.
Councilmember Leahy felt this would be a good topic for a future meeting.
look at priorities and have an openness to express feelings on how to
approach different situations and to nail down some things. Perhaps the
Planning Commission had some ideas that Council had not thought of.
Mr. McNabb suggested that perhaps the Planning Commission looked at
things creatively without budget considerations, and Council looked at the
approximate cost and then the development plan, and that was how the
situation arose.
4
March 28, 1995
Councilmember Oaks noted that perhaps Council was not committed to a
design, but had planned for four units, when the Planning Commission felt
three units were better suited to the area. Thought is was just a
misunderstanding.
Chairman Duistermars indicated it was the cart before the horse, because
things usually came to the Planning Commission first.
Mr. McNabb again suggested a more normal process to get input first on
RDA projects from the Planning Commission.
Mr. Duistermars would be comfortable with that, if they were aware that
Council had already approved. Also liked the normal process and
working closer together with the Council, with both looking down the road
at maintaining the quality of life.
Mr. McNabb explained that increased density was needed to lower the
housing subsidy and create affordable housing. In terms of the more
traditional development, the Heritage area would be more appropriate for
smaller lots. That was why the zone was created and the City Council
and Planning Commission needed to understand the reasoning.
Mayor Pro Tern Solorio explained the need for a preliminary site plan.
The need to hire a consultant, because of the lack of staff time to prepare
a design. Concerned that changes could lead to more problems down the
road. The amount of staff time could be substantial, which would have to
be reimbursed.
Mr. McNabb explained that the only reimbursement would be from RDA
funds to City funds. How long it would take, would depend on the size of
the design. With the changes, if the design was modified several times, it
would cost more. There were staff with the necessary skills to do the
designs.
Councilmember Leahy suggested that architectural designs be created to
be re -used for other areas.
Mr. McNabb indicated that as the housing program matured, more
architectural plans would be acquired, and they could be modified and re-
used. The goal was to save funds on design.
March 28, 1995
7.4 Vosburg Hotel Update
Community Development Director McNabb advised that the Planning
Commission requested an update on the Hotel. Further, Council had
pushed to improve the outside appearance. The owner was paying for
construction out of his pocket and had made very little progress in the last
three months. Staff had been there, but no formal inspections and
nothing had been completed. In response to Council, advised of the
phasing plan in which the owner had intended to generate income. The
only contact by staff was when there would be a code enforcement issue
or call for inspection. Explained the owner had six months, between
inspections, before permits would expire, and they called just enough to
keep the permit active.
City Manager Easter advised that Mr. Oaks had met with staff and the
owner 3-4 months ago, and suggested that he may be willing to do so
again.
Consensus that Messrs. Oaks, Hixson, and Wilson meet with the owner
and report back at the joint meeting.
7.5 Heritage Days Event
Commissioner Ayres asked for suggestions on what they could do to
make such events more successful. Like the Vosburg, there was a lot of
local interest and frustration. Many would like to see it complete for
Heritage Days.
Patti Drusky, Chamber of Commerce Executive Director gave an overview
of the events and those working on the committee; Tim Hults, Nat Holmes
and Commissioner Meadows. The matter would be on the City Council
agenda on April 4, 1995.
Councilmember Leahy suggested that Commissioner Meadows report
back to the Commission. In addition, she had heard the Business
Association was thinking of having the Potato Festival.
Ms. Drusky indicated that would be forthcoming in October.
March 28, 1995
City Manager Easter suggested that a copy of the City Council report be
given to the Planning Commission and they could schedule it for their next
meeting.
There being no further business to conduct, A MOTION was made by Chairman
Duistermars, seconded by Commissioner Ayres, to adjourn. The hour of adjournment
for the Planning Commission being 8:25 P.M.
At the hour of 8:25 P.M. City Council recessed.
At the hour of 8:44 P.M. City Council reconvened with all members present, except the
vacant Council seat.
Noted there were no Public Comments.
7.6 Request by Helen Burrow's Agent to Stop Demolition Proceedings on 486
W. Second Street
Dane Kimmel, representing the Owner, gave a brief overview of the
history of the property, including fire damage which was paid for and not
completed and unpaid back taxes of prior owners. Acknowledgement of
the owners receipt of demolition notices, and the failure to appeal due to a
lack of understanding. Advised the property had a new buyer, who was
willing to bring the property up to code. The prospective buyer was in
receipt of a full disclosure of the situation and escrow was conditional
upon the City of San Jacinto granting permits. Requested the Council
rescind the demolition order and allow the seller to consummate the sale.
In response to Council inquiries, advised that the prospective buyer was
fully aware of the cost involved to refurbish the house.
Council concerns were, that it was an unfortunate situation, and would
rather have the property refurbished than demolished. However,
concerned that they would have another Vosburg situation. If the escrow
did not close, or repairs were not made, there was a significant safety
issue. Inquired if there were any restrictions which could be placed on the
project?
Community Development Director McNabb advised that basically, if
Council overturned the process staff could evaluate the timing of the
rehabilitation and if 75% of the work were complete there would not be a
need for a demolition order. To fix or demo was an option available in the
Housing Code. However, once a permit was issued for rehabilitation it
7
March 28, 1995
could be just like the Vosburg, so long as they make progress and call for
inspections periodically, it could last a long time. Stated for the record, it
sounded like a landlord situation and under the circumstances and the
condition, occupancy could not be granted until the work was totally
complete.
Council understood, that under no circumstances would staff allow
occupancy without the completed repairs, so there were no
misunderstanding at a later date, that because of the cost and the need to
complete by a certain date, staff would not entertain an early occupancy.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by
Councilmember Oaks to reverse the demolition process for the residence
in question, with the stipulation that improvements be made within a
resonsble amount of time. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Council seat
vacant.
8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
Councilmember Leahy read from materials received from the San Jacinto
Museum Association, noting that former Mayor Hafliger had indicated his belief
the City would not fund them in the budget. She wanted to clarify that no vote
such as that had been taken by the Council.
City Manager Easter advised the Museum Board had been invited to make a
presentation to the Council, which was scheduled for April 4, 1995.
Ms. Leahy further indicated, the Association Secretary had volunteered to send
copies of their minutes for inclusion in the Council packet.
Ms. Leahy then wanted the record to show her objection to the Brown Act
violation noted by Mr. Smedley at the last meeting. While she appreciated Mr.
Smedley withdrawing his request for investigation, she wanted the record to
reflect her objection to the obvious violation and that she was under no obligation
to keep it a secret. She disapproved of the actions, commended Mr. Smedley
for the withdrawal, but felt the Council was obligated to bring the matter forth and
clearly object to the violation.
8
March 28, 1995
8.1 Council Resignation - Declaration of Vacancy
Deputy City Clerk Lee made a presentation as contained in the staff
report on file with the City Clerk.
Councilmember Leahy indicated this was the fourth time, since being on
the Council, to consider a special election, at significant cost to the City.
Felt that by appointing it would give an advantage to the incumbent at the
next election. On the other hand, concerned about the possibility of tie
votes. Sensed in the last few meetings, the remaining four had, there was
an attitude to work together and the four could develop a sense of trust. If
a tie vote were to occur, they could change an opinion through discussion.
Hence she would opt to leave the position vacant until the November
election.
Councilmember Oaks would like to see the Council appoint someone to
preclude any tie votes and having problems like they did with the clean
water act awhile back. Would like to go back to a five member body as
soon as possible, so recommended appointing an individual to fill the slot.
Councilmember Williams thought a lot on this issue and agreed, although
he recognized the potential problems of leaving the seat vacant, was not
convinced that having 15 minute interviews would help them to find a
person to fill the seat for seven months, and that person trying to play
catch up and get rolling on issues that face the Council. Agreed there
was a spirit of cooperation among the four Councilmembers and would be
comfortable being able to tend to the business of the community for the
next 7-8 months.
Mayor Pro Tern Solorio agreed with Jan and Pat, since this was such an
important position, felt it was up to the voters at large to select someone
to fill the position, As much as he would like to appoint, he did not think it
would be a benefit, except to the appointee running in the November
election, may lead the race. The Council was working well together, as a
unit and no power struggles.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by
Councilmember Williams, to not appoint to fill the vacancy and proceed
for the duration as a four member body.
City Attorney Cox recommended the Council amend their motion to
include the vacancy would be filled by election.
9
March 28, 1995
MOTION was amended to not appoint to fill the vacancy and fill by
election, and proceed for the duration as a four member body. Motion
carried on a 3-1 vote with Councilmember Oaks dissenting.
At the hour of 9:05 P.M. Council recessed.
At the hour of 9:15 P.M. Council reconvened for closed session, with all members
present except the Council vacancy, pursuant to the following:
9.0 CLOSED SESSION
9.1 Conference with Legal Counsel, Anticipated Litigation - Significant
Exposure to Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)
1 case
9.2 Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956 - California Resources Agency vs. City
of San Jacinto
9.3 Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956 - California Farm Bureau vs. City of San
Jacinto
9.4 Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title: City Manager) Pursuant
to Government Code 54957
At the hour of 11:16 P.M. Council reconvened in open session, with all members
present except the Council vacancy, and announced that the City Council had
confirmed the satisfactory evaluation and step increase due the City Manager.
10.0 ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned. The
hour of adjournment being 11:17 P.M.
Approved by
Submitted by
Bob Wilson, City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
10
Mayor
AL NDA 5• LI
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Larry L. Weaver, Interim -Finance Director
Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of Register of Audited Demands
and Payroll Checks
DATE: April 18, 1995
RECOMMENDATION
Approve warrant numbers 40133 through 40244 dated April 15, 1995 in the amount of
$487,322.45 and Payroll check numbers 4981 through 5059 dated March 31, 1995.
SUMMARY
A listing of accounts payable warrants is attached for your review and approval.
Payroll information is available for your review in the Finance Department.
yP•ROGRAM2 GM3131.; ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST
ht_FUH I NUMUL
GROUP NUMBER
ACCOUNTING PERIOD%
GROUP USER ANNE
00263 FREPAIDS
10/1995
TRANS* TRANS DATE VOUCHER AK ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION
100 03/31/1995 004400
PAYROLL.
200 03/31/1995 004481
DEFERRED COMP DEDUCTIONS
300 03/31/1995 004482
DEFERRED COMP DEDUCTIONS
400 03/31/1995 004483
PURCHASES OF RIFLES
500 03/31/1995 004484
ACCOUNTING TECI-INICIAN
00 085-0000-202.21-30
00 085-0000-202.21--29
00 085-0000-202.21--29
00 085-0000-202.21-33
REINA. BY EMPLOYEES
00 019-41.50-410.50-10
600 03/31/1995 004485 00 025-7256-410.50-10
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN
700 03/31/1995 004486 00 050-9000-450.50-10
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN
800 03/31/1995 004487 00 055-4170-450.50-10
`:GLINTING TECHNICIAN
900 03/31/1995 004488 00 035-3100-431.50--1.0
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN
1000 03/31/1995 004489 00 036-3100-431.50-10
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN
11.00 03/31/1995 004490 00 037-3100-431.50-10
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN
1200 03/31/1995 004491 00 091-9700-470.50-10
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN
1300 03/31/1995 004492 00 096-9700-470.50-10
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN
1400 03/31/1995 004493 00 099-9700-470.50-10
ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN
1500 03/31/1995 004494 00 010-1400-414.34-05
I.NTER:LM--FINANCE DIRECTOR
PRDJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECKS CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
0000235 CITY OF SAN JACINT❑
00/00/0000 0040133 03/31/1995
0000691 LINCOLN NATIONAL
00/00/0000 00401.34 03/31/1995
0000607 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
00/00/0000 0040135 03/31/1995
0000235 CITY OF SAN JACINTO
00/00/0000 0040136 03/31/1995
0001068 RAY BOUZA
00/00/0000 0040137 03/31/1995
0001068 RAY BOUZA
00/00/0000 0040137 03/31/1995
0001068 RAY BOUZA
00/00/0000 0040137 03/31/1995
0001068 RAY BOUZA
00/00/0000 0040137 03/31/1995
0001068 RAY BOUZA
00/00/0000 0040137 03/31/1995
0001068 RAY BOUZA
00/00/0000 0040137 03/31/1995
0001068 RAY BOUZA
00/00/0000 0040137 03/31/1995
0001068 RAY BOUZA
00/00/0000 0040137 03/31/1995
0001068 RAY BOUZA
00/00/0000 0040137 03/31/1995
0001068 RAY SOUZA
00/00/0000 00401.37 03/31/1995
0001831 LARRY WEAVER
00/00/0000 0040138 03/31/1.995
REQ
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
REQ
N
REQ
N
REQ
N
REQ
N
REQ
N
REQ
N
REQ
N
REQ
N
REQ
N
REQ
N
REQ
N
REQ
N
AMOUNT
101.908.37
1,243.54
008.38
1,405.97
25.62
25.62
256 .20
32.02
1.2.10
60.54
100.30
6.40
25.62
96.08
1,110.00
GROUP NUMBEI.
ACCOUNTING PERIODS
CROUP USER ANNE
00263 r-(EF'AIDR
10/1995
TRANS* TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2
1600 03/31/1.995 004495
NOTICE OF PENDENCY FILING
1700 04/05/1995 004552
COBRA-VRYHEI I:
1000 04/05/1995 004553
CODRA--F'F RRY
1900 04/05/1995 004554
HEALTH TNSURANCE: PREMIUM
2000 04/05/1.995 004555
..iRS RETIREMENT
00 010-3210-431.30-90
WEED ABATEMENT
00 065-0000-201.08-64
00 065..-0000..-201 .08-- 64
00 085-0000-202.21-39
00 085-0000-202.21_.20
CONTRIBUTIONS
2100 04/05/1995 004556 00
LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM
2200 04/05/199.5 004557 00
COMPUTER KEYBOARD
2300 04/05/1995 004558 00
EMPLOYEE.:: OF THE QUARTER
2400 04/05/1995 004559 00
PETTY CASH -CITY AUCTION
2500 04/05/1995 004560
LEGAL ADVERTISING
2600 04/05/1995 004561
SUBSCRIPTION
2700 04/11/1995 004580
POSIT/L.EAGUF_ OF CALIF.
2800 04/11/1995 004581
EYE CARE PREMIUM
2900 04/11/1.995 004582
COBRA-DAVE WARREN
3000 04/11./1995 004583
I"IEAI...TH INSURANCE PREMIUM
085-0000-202.21-46
010-.1 ? 1.0--412.21. - i.0
010-1100-411.21-10
019--4550-410.33--30
00 010-1110-411.36--25
00 010-2500-..425. 36--2.5
00 010-1100-411.31-20
CONFERENCE-WIL.LIAMS
00 085--0000--202.21-35
APRIL 1995
00 065-0000-201..08-64
00 085- 0000--202. 21- 39
APRIL 1995
PROD P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DIJE DATE CHECK* CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
0001030 RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER REQ
00/00/0000 0040139 03/31/1995 N
0000969 AETNA HEALTH PLANS OF STMT.
00/00/0000 0040140 04/05/1995 N
0000969 AETNA HEALTH FLANS OF STMT.
00/00/0000 00401.40 04/05/1995 N
0000969 AETNA HEALTH PLANS OF STMT.
00/00/0000 0040140 04/03/1995 N
0000830 PERS REQ
00/00/0000 0040141. 04/03/1995 N
0000419 STANDARD INS. COMPANY STMT
00/00/0000 0040142 04/03/1995 N
0000727 MICROFLIGHT COMPUTERS REQ
00/00/0000 0040143 04/05/1995 N
0001835 ROBERT M. THOMAS REQ
00/00/0000 0040144 04/04/1995 N
0001034 CITY OF SAN JACINTO PETTY REQ
00/00/0000 0040145 04/05/1995 N
0000566 HEMET NEWS STMT.
00/00/0000 0040146 04/05/1995 N
0000025 PRESS -ENTERPRISE SJ--006
00/00/0000 0040147 04/0S/1995 N
0001836 HILTON HOTEL REP
00/00/0000 0040148 04/06/1995 N
0000472 EYE CARE OF AMERICA STMT
00/00/0000 0040149 04/06/1995 N
0000149 HEALTH NET STMT
00/00/0000 0040150 04/06/1995 N
0000149 HEALTH NET STMT
00/00/0000 0040150 04/06/1995 N
AMOUNT
65.00
189.05
189.05
2,589.95
11 .896.30
2.83 7.84
53.80
50.00
:I..000.00
270.00
102.45
92.00
476.73
291..80
17.03:1..75
rrsumkuirr. r.n-ro.r.or..
OROUP NUMBER I 00263 PREPAIDS
ACCOUNTING PERIOD/ 10/1995
NROUP USER ANNE
TRANS* TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION 1. DESCRIPTION 2
3100 04/11/1995 004584 00 050-9000--450.21.--1.0
TT ARF IITT:I ITY BILLING
3300 04/11/1995 004586
9 EMINAI' SACRAMENTO
PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECK: CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER
00/00/0000 00401.51 04/06/1995
00 010-1.100-411.31--20 0001839 DAVID SOLORIO
00/00/0000 0040153 04/1.1/1995
3400 04/11/1.995 004587 00 010-1100--411.31-20
NEVADA CITY TOUR SEMINAR WILLIAMS .. SOLORIO
COUNT:
AMOUNT:
GROUP TOTALS
33
145.554.56
VEO
N
RE CI
N
0001840 LOCAL GOVERNMENT CIIMMISSI REG
00/00/0000 0040154 04/11./1.995 N
AMOUNT
1,000.00
100.00
40.00
GROUP NUMBER -
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
GROUP USER ANNE
00266 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
10/1995
TRANS: TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2
100 04/05/1995 004496
'500 CITE GUARDS
200 04/05/1995 004497
QUARTERLY WORKERS COMP
300 04/05/1995 004498
DRAIN POOLS
400 04/05/1995 004499
FEDERAL EXPRESS MAILING
500 04/05/1995 004500
UERAL EXPRESS MAILING
600 04/05/1995 004501
1-EItERAL EXPRESS MAILING
00 010-3100-431.36-1.0
POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 010-2250-419.37-05
PREMIUM 4/1/95-7/1/95
00 01.0--3210-431.30-90
WASHINGTON 2. VICTORIA
00 065-0000-310.08-64
00 096-9700-470.21-10
00 010-2500-425.21-10
700 04/05/1995 004502 00 010-3100-431.34-06
WAN (:;LETS LINE
POLICE DEPARTMENT
800 04/05/1995 004503 00
MAINTENANCE -LINE PRINTER
900 04/05/1995 004504 00
MAINT'ENANCE-•I....1:NE PRINTER
1000 04/05/1995 004505 00
MAINTENANCE -LINE PRINTER
1100 04/05/1995 004506 00
LONG DISTANCE SERVICES
1200 04/05/1995 004507 00
NG DISTANCE SERVICES
1300 04/05/1995 004508 00
LONG DISTANCE SERVICES
1400 04/05/1995 004509 00
POSTAGE -POLICE DEPARTMENT
010-2500--425.34-05
055-4170-• 450. 33-30
050-9000- 450.33- 30
01.0- 7400-425. 35-:1.6
010-3200-431.35-16
010-31.00-431.35-16
010-3100-431.21-60
1500 04/05/1995 00451.0 00 010-2500-425.30-90
SALES TAX AUDITS
PROD P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
ItUE DATE CHECK0 CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
0001827 CITE -GUARD REED
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000180 C.V.J.P.I.A. STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001075 DOUGLAS POOL SERVICE 3/95
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000484 FEDERAL EXPRESS REG
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000484 FEDERAL EXPRESS REG
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000484 FEDERAL EXPRESS REG
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000605 I.H.M. CORP. 35V9647
04/15/1975 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000605 I.H.M. CORP. 35V9647
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000605 I.H.M. CORP. 35V9647
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001.080 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS 532163
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001080 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS 532163
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001080 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS 532163
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000707 MAIL PLUS MORE 10308
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000750 MUNICIPAL RESOURCE STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
AMOUNT
137.38
45.668.00
100.00
30.00
32.50
22.00
1'78.75
131..64
47.88
59.04
1.27
6.98
5.42
9.05
500.00
GROUP NUMBER 2 00266 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNTING PERIODS 10/1995
GROUP USER ANNE
TRANS* TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2
:1.600 04/05/1.995 004511.
•KIP D Ri it lOt-I GRADE FOR
1700 04/05/1995 004512
ROLL-til l 'CRASH CON'T'AINERF;
1.800 04/05✓1995 004513
REIMBURSE POLICIE. DEPT.
1900 04/05/1995 00451.4
REIMBURSE POLICE DEFT.
2000 04/015/1995 00451.5
RE: i:MBURIJE POLICE DEPI.
2100 04/05/1995 004516
REIMBURSE POLICE DEP'T .
2200 04/05/1995 00451.7
RET:MDURI°;E POLICE DEFT.
2300 04/05/1995 004510
'TATION PROCESSED
2400 04/05/1.995 004519
VEHICLE: GRAPHICS
2500 04/05/1995 004520
REFUSE FEES FOR STREET
2600 04/05/1995 004521
RENTAL (IF MOBILE OFFICE
2700 04/05/1995 004522
RENTAL OF MOBILE OFFICE
2800 04/05/1995 004523
SIGNS -PARK IMPROVEMENT
2900 04/05/1995 004524
1.IT21.. I'I IFS
.3000 04/05/1995 004525
UTILITIES
00 096--9700-470.40--01
CURBS -ESPLANADE AVENUE
00 099-9700--470.34-05
00 010--3100-431.33-21.
PETTY CASH FUND
00 010-3100-431.71.--10
PETTY CASH FUND
00 010-3100.-.431 .2:1-30
PETTY CASH FUND
00 010-•3100-431.34-50
PETTY CASH FUND
00 010--3100-431.34--50
PETTY CASH FUND
00 010-3100-431..34-05
FEBRUARY 1995
00 019-3100-431.33-50
POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 021-4150--41.0.34-05
SWEEPING
PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECK* CHECK HATE TYPE LAST TRANS
00 010-3100--431.34-05
LEASE-POL..ICE DEPARTMENT
00 010-3100-431.34-05
LEASE -POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 020-7100-41.0.40--01
PROJECTS
00 010-2500-425.35-14
00 01.0-3100-431..35--1.4
6946 0000761 NBS/LOWRY
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000770 D.K. ASSOC. INC.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000013 P.D. PETTY CASH
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000013 P.D. PETTY CASH
04/15/1.995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000013 P.D. PETTY CASH
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000813 F.D. PETTY CASH
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000813 P.D. PETTY CASH
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001517 PHOENIX GROUP
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001653 POLYCRAFT, INC.
04/1.5/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001830 CO. OF RIVERSIDE WASTE MN
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
H025-003--MJR
N
STMT
N
RE(;l
N
REG
N
RE()
N
RED
N
REO
N
8649-00
N
A214I1--:L
N
52
N
0000922 SCOTSMAN MANUFACTURING CO 5MC000805640395
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000922 SCOTSMAN MANUFACTURING CO CF'X015740395
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001.1.19 SIGN ART
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
2643
N
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
04/1.5/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
AMOUNT
1.,835.00
2.267.16
6.44
17.13
32.22
17.19
L6.30
93.00
501.05
5.00
74.96
922.88
157.50
7131.07
527.65
GROUP NUMBER
. ACCOUNTING F'ERIOI:D;
GROUP USER ANNE
00266 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
10/1995
TRANS: TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2
3100 04/05/1995
UTILITIES
3200 04/05/1995
UTILITIES
3300 04/05/1995
IJT I I...:I:'r I IF:!ii
3400 04/05/1995
I.rrIL.IT:1:I:S
3500 04/05/:1.995
3600 04/05/1995
UTILITIES
3700 04/05/1995
UTILITIES
3800 04/05/1995
UTILITIES
3900 04/05/1995
UTILITIES
IES
4000 04/05/1995
UTILITIES
004526 00 01.0--3200 - 431.. 35-:L 4
004527 00 010-4150-•410.35-14
004520 00 010--61.00-425.35-14
004529 00 010-7400-425.35-14
004530 00 025-7100-410.35--14
004531 00 025-7250-410.35-14
004532 00 025-7260-41.0.35-14
004533
004534
004535
00
00
00
025-7254-410.35-14
025- r 256-41.0.3`.,.....14
025....7256-410.35-14
41.00 04/05/1.995 004536 00 025-..7257-410.35-14
UTILITIES
4200 04/05/1.995 004537
(LITIES
4300 04/05/1995 004530
I IT:[I...I T Fi'
4400 04/05/1.995 004539
I.IrII...I.TF.F3
4500 04/05/1.995 004540
I IT'II.1'T TFS
00 025-7260-410.35-14
00 025-7260- 410.3 5--14
00 025-7260-410.35-1.4
00 02 ;-'7265-4:L0.35--14
F•ROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECKt CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. .STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000447 S0. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDI.SON CO. STMT.
04/15✓1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
AMOUNT
1.024.54
499.2'7
6.34
522.87
400.20
4'7.85
386.17
33.00
826.07
40.95
66.51.
902.59
484.15
206.75
16.74
GROI.IFNUMBER 00266 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNTING PERIODS 10/1995
GROW ' USER ANNE
TRANS4 TRANS DATE VOUCHER DK ACCOI INT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2
4600 04/05/1995 004541. 00 055-4170-•450.35-14
"I: L.:I:'1 1:I :
.... 4700 04/05/1.995
UTILITIES
4500 04/0S/:199.5
U'T1:I...:I:T'J'.LfS
4900 04/05/1995
LIT1:L1'I TI.'.:S
5000 04/05/1995
UTILITIES
004542
004543
004544
004545
00 050-..9000-450.35-14
00 010-2500--425.35-1.2.
00 010-3100-431.35-12
00 01.0_.4150....41.0.35-12.
5100 04/05/1995 004546 00 010-6100-425.35-12
UTILITIES
5200 04/05/1995 004547 00 010-7400-425.35-12
LTTII...I:TIE:'.:.
5300 04/05✓1.995 004540
”'T.T.L-IT7:ES
5400 04/05/1995 004549
LOWING CHARGES
5500 04/05/1.995 004550
VACCINATION FC1R I-IEF'ATI'RJS
5600 04/05/1995 00455.E
MEMBERSHIP DUES 1994-95
COON!:
AMOUNT:
00 050-9000-450.35-12
00 010-3100-431.34-1.1
POLICE. .DEPARTMENT
00 010-3100-431.30-90
B-POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 01.0--2500-425.31--20
GROUP TOTALS
56
78.267.31
PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECK CHECK HATE TYPE LAST TRANS
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
04/1.5/1.995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000436 SO. CALIFORNIA GAS CD. STMT.
04/1.5/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000436 S0. CALIFORNIA OAS CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000436 SO. CALIFORNIA GAS CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000436 SO. CALIFORNIA GAS CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000436 SO. CALIFORNIA GAS CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000436 SO. CALIFORNIA GAS CO. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001G2G TOM'S TOW
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001492 US FAMILY CARE/HEMET
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
STMT.
N
STMT.
N
00011.72 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL.. STMT.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
AMOUNT
:3_;'..5B
14,041.93
140.63
61.05
30.59
80.87
1.:1.1.92
30.60
95.00
444.00
3.400.00
CIROUP NI.IMDEI
ACCOUN'1'INO PERIOD:
GROUP USER ANNE
00270 s COUNTS PAYABLE
10/1995
TRANS* TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2
100 04/05/1995 004562
REPAIR VALVE INDICATOR
200 04/05/1995 004563
RENTAL —FAX MACHINE
300 04/05/1995 004564
SAFETY EUUIPME.:NI
400 04/05/1995 004565
GOPHER PROGRAM
500 04/05/1995 004566
JAN:F.ZEi:R 6 FIRST AID KIT
600 04/05/1995 004567
AIR BAG ACCESSORY STORAGE
700 04/05/1995 004568
1F:AF'F I.0 SAFETY LIGHTS
ROO 04/05/1995 004569
REBUILD ALTERNATOR
900 04/05/1995 004570
DEFIBRILLATOR PADS
1000 04/00/1995 004571.
ELECTRICAL sL.IEP'1..IES
1100 04/05/1995 004572
BOXED TREES
1300 04/05/1995 004574
'LACE HEATER CORE
1400 04/05/1995 004575
CONCRETE —WATER DFFT.
1500 04/05/1995 004576
SUPPLIES —POLICE DEFT.
PROJ F.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECK* CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
00 019-3200-431.33-50
LIGFIT--UNIT 208/FIRE DE:F-'T.
00 010-2500-425.34-05
00 010-3210--431.21--35
CODE ENFORCEMENT
00 025-7256-410.34-05
RANCHO SAN JACINTO
00 010-3100-431.21-14
ANIMAL CONTROL UNIT
00 010-32.00-431.21-80
BOX —FIRE DEPARTMENT
00 019-4150-410.33-50
PUBLIC WORKS
00 019-3200-431.33-50
UNIT +208—FIRE DEPARTMENT
00 062--3200-431.33--30
FIRE DEPARTMENT
00 025-7260-410.21-40
STREET LIGHTS
00 032-7150-41.0.40-01.
DE ANZA & CYPRESS
00 019-3200-431.33-50
UNIT +207—FIRE DEEP'.
00 050-9000-450.33-30
00 010-3100-431.21.-1.4
1600 04/05/1995 004577 00 050'-9000....450.30--90
ELECTRIC: 4 WIIEF:L. INDUSTRIAL TRUCK —WATER
0001317 A.L. BOLSTAD FIRE PUMP RE 95--2688
04/:I.::/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000169 BIJRTRONICS BUSINESS SYS. 1.44922
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001832 DIRECT SAFETY
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
051.327701.
N
7323 0000263 LI & J LANDSCAPE & MAINTEN 10363
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000521 GALLS, INC.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
4000388
N
0001833 HEIMAN FIRE EQUIPMENT, IN 61906-14035
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000589 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE 2293
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001834 HEMET AUTOMOTIVE
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
1.5804
N
0001489 LAERDAL MEDICAL CORPORATI 501.354
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 W
0001028 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1.75045
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000800 F'ARKHILL NURSERY
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
STMT
N
0000812 POLAR BEAR RADIATOR SERVI 16507
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000222 SHARP BUILDING SUPPLY
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000822 SHARP BUILDING SUF'F_.Y
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
500147
N
501223
N
0001.419 TOWNE & FAIRWAY BOI..r-CARr> 941962
04/15/1995 0000000 0(>/00/0000 N
AMOUNT
17.99
326.01
10.53
300.00
68.93
50.77
1,651.61
381.04
420.23
332.75
608.25
250.00
20:1..49
36.66
5,505.23
GROUP NUMBER
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
GROUP IJ5ER ANNE
00270 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
10/1995
TRANS* TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2
1700 04/05/1995 004578
'I...ACEMENT FARTS
1900 04/05/1995 004579
9TI3NS FOR C.:OMMLINITY
1900 04/11./1.995 004588
`3IGNATL11':E.. ELATE
2000 04/11/1995 004589
CRIS USER GR(31.11" TRAINING
21.00 04/11./1995 004590
CRTs SEMINAR
2200 04/11/1995 004591
JANITORIAL- SUPPLIES
2300 04/1:1./1995
JANITORIAL :L.AI_ SUPPL.:r ES
2400 04/11/1995
'PPL:LES RETURNED
2500 04/:I.1./1.995
suPPl._:I:E:s RETURNED
004592
004593
004594
2600 04/11/1995 004595
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
2700 04/11./1995
..IANIT'13RJ:A1._ SUFP'LIEG
2800 04/1.1/1995
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
2900 04/11/1995
.JANT TORIAL SIJPF'LIES
00 010-3200-431.34-50
DREATHING APPARATI)5
00 011-7400--425.21 -10
CENTER
00 010--2500-4225.21-10
EASTER & LEAHY
00 010-3100-431.31-25
POST REIMBURSABLE
PROJ P.D. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE_ CHECK* CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
00 01.0-3100-431.31-25
DEBRA CASKEY--POLICE DEPT.
00 010-3100-431.21-30
POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 010-7400-425.21.-1.0
cOMMUNITY CENTER
00 010--3200-431.21-1.0
00 010-31.00-431 .2:L-1.0
00 010-1.700-417.21-10
004596 00 010- 3210--431 .21-1.0
004597 00 010-3300-431.21-10
004598 00 010-4100-410.21-1.0
COIJN T :
AMOUNT:
GROUP TOTALS
28
1.1.59'7.86
0000356 VALLEN SAFETY SIJPPL..Y
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000311 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES. INC.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001150 ABM BUSINESS MACHINES
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001339 DEBRA CASKEY
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001837 CRIS USER GROUT'
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000780 OVERNIGHT INDUSTRIAL
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
527791.:L
N
33129
N
:I.1.769
N
REO
N
REO
N
9080
N
0000983 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY :194985
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000983 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 185143
04/03/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 1.85106
04/03/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 185182
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000883 RIVERSIDE_ COUNTY SUPPLY 185182
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 1851.82
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000883 RIVERSIDE_ COUNTY SUPPLY 185182
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
AMOUNT
232.04
198.80
111.42
426.00
1.25.00
75.43
89.40
1.97-
46.32....
34.52
34.52
34.52
34.51
GROUP NUMBER
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
GROUP USER ANNE
00272 AC;COUNT'S PAYABLE
10/199S
TRANS* TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION I DESCRIPTION 2
1.00 04/11/1995 004599
MEALS f UR PRISONERS
200 04/11/1995 004600
EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER
300 04/1.1/1995 004601.
IANITOI IAL.. SERVICES
400 04/11/1995 004602
DRUG SCREENING
500 04/11/1995 004603
_.»'LACE CITY HALT... BASE
600 04/11/1995 004604
SEWER FEE COLLECTIONS
700 04/11./1.995 004605
F1JBL.T:C WORKS ADMIN.
800 04/11/1995 004606
PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN.
900 04/11/1995 004607
PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN.
1000 04/11/1995 004608
PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN.
11.00 04/11/1995 0046(>9
I" IJBI...TC WORKS ADMIN.
1200 04/11/1995 00461.0
<I...TC WORKS ADMIN.
1300 04/11/1995 00461.1
PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN.
1400 04/11/1995 004612
PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN.
1500 04/1.1/1.995 004613
C'Iirii. 'I: C1 WORKS ADMIN.
00 010-3100-431..21-1.1
POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 010-1.1.00- 411 .21--10
PLAQUE
00 010-7400-425.34--05
COMMUNITY CENTER--APRIL.
00 010-3100-431.30--17
POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 050--9000- 450.33-30
STATION
00 065-0000-201.08-70
FEBRUARY 1995
00 050-9000-450.30--90
MARCH 1995
00 055--41/0-450.30-90
MARCH 1995
00 019-4550-41.0.30-90
MARCH 1995
00 021-4150-410.30-90
MARCH 1995
00 010-4100-410.30-90
MARCH 1995
00 025-7250-410.30-90
MARCH 1995
00 020-7100•-4:L0.40-01
MARCH 1995
00 046-8800-450.30-90
MARCH 1995
00 025-7255-410.30-90
MARCH 1995
95 04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
PROJ F.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
0000996 ALPHA BETA 51014
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000997 ANADY'S TROPHIES 1626
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000935 LOLJIS ARROYO STMT
N
0001182 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 974031
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000238 COM SER CO. 3-2395
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATE..R DIST. REO
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000477 EVANS P. ASSOCIATES STMI
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000477 EVANS P. ASSOCIATES STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000477 EVANS P. ASSOCIATES STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000477 EVANS P. ASSOCIATES STMT
04/1.5/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
AMOUNT
30.78
1.5.09
625.00
495.00
180.00
28,973.52
1.,350.00
225.00
975.00
750.00
1,350.00
600.00
225.00
600.00
1.50.00
GROUP NUMBER 00272 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNTING PERIOC'2 10/1995
GROUP l.I-ER ANNE
TRANS. TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2
1600 04/1.1/1995 0046:1.4 00 025--7260--410.30--90
MARCH 1.995
1700 04/11/1995 004615 00 041-"4155-41.0.40-01.
MARCH 1995
1.500 04/11/1995 004616 00 022-4150-410.40-01
WORKS ADMIN.
PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN.
PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN.
MARCH 1995
1900 04/11/1995 004617 00 065-0000-229.08-67
REIMBURSE WATER/'TRASH
DEPOSIT
2000 04/11/1995 004611:1 00 010_.2500--425.35--16
PHONE SERVICES
2100 04/1.1/1995 0046:1.9 00 010--41.50--41.0.35-16
PHONE SERVICES
2200 04/:1.1✓1995 004620 00 010-2500--425.21.--10
DATE ASSEMBLY t. PAD FOR STAMP
2300 04/11/1995 004621. 00 010---2500-4. 5.21--10
--1-NK1:NI..; WATFR
-... 2400 04/11/T925 004622 00 019--41.50-41.0.33-50
AUTO IAl l S
2500 04/11/1995 004623 00 019-9000-450.33-50
AUTO PARTS
2600 04/11/1995 004624 00 0:10-1110--411.2:1.--10
OFFICE SUPPLIES
2700 04/11/1995 004625 00 010-1400-414.21-10
OFFICE SUPPLIES
2000 04/1.1/1995 004626 00 010-2500-425.21-1.0
OFFICE SUPPLIES
2900 04/11/1995 004627 00 050-9000-450.21-10
OFFICE. SUPPLIES
3000 04/11/1995 0046218 00 055-4170-450.34--05
MATNTENANCE ON SEWER I...:CFT STATION
FROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DLIE T'ATE CHECK''=` CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
0000477 EVANS 6 ASSOCIATES
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001941 LORRAINE GARCIA
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
04/15/1.995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000299 HEMET RUBBER STAMP
04/1.5/1.995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001590 HORIZON WATER
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000597 QUALITY AUTO PARTS
04/1.5/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000597 QUALITY AUTO PARTS
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000600 HUBBS STATIONERY
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000600 HUBBS STATIONERY
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000600 HUBBS STATIONERY
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000600 HUBBS STATIONERY
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000639 JIMNI SYSTEMS. INC.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
REQ
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
7053
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
1923
N
AMOUNT
375.00
225.00
75.00
16.95
29.17
27.22
:1.7.00
39.50
:11.0.02
75.37
311.66
144.29
378.56
18.01
462.50
moor NUMBER
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
GROUP USER ANNE
00272 :COUNTS PAYABLE
10/1995
MANS: TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2
3100 OA/11/1995
CAL_• -•ID CIFI...I-.LII...Al
3200 (>4/11/1995
STAFF ASSISTANCE
3300 04/11/1995
REFUSE COLLECTIONS
3400 04/11/1.995
ALARM SERVICES
004629 00 010-3100-431.35-17
POLICE DEPARTMENT
004630 00 010-1110-411.34-05
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
(>04631 00 065-0000-201.08-69
F EBRUAF•.'Y 1995
004632 00
3500 04/11/1995 004633 00
-AOE:RS--POLICE DEPARTMENT
3600 04/11/1995 004634
PAGERS-PUBL.IC WORKS
3700 04/11/1995 004635
LAW ENFORCEMENT ADMIN.
3800 04/11/1995 004636
INSTALL. COMPUTER PRINTER
3900 04/11/1995 004637
SERVICE ENGINE 1208
4000 04/1.1/1995 004638
OFFICE SUPPLIES
4100 04/11/199S 004639 00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
4200 04/11/1995 004640 00
FICF.. SUPPLIES
4300 04/11/1995 004641 00
UFFTC:E SUPPLIES
010-2500-425.33-10
01.0-3100--- 431 .35-16
(>0 055-4170- 450.35- 16
00 010-3100-431.30--16
DUES
00 050-9000-450.21-10
BELT -WATER DEPARTMENT
00 010-3200-431.33-50
FIRE DEPARTMENT
00 010-3210-431.21-10
010- 3300- 431 .21. --1.0
010-4100-410.21-10
010-1700--417.21- 1.0
4400 04/11/1995 004642 00 050-9000-450.30--90
FAX NOTIFICATIONS
WATER DEPARTMENT
4500 04/11/1995 004643 00 010-3100-431.34--05
COPIER MAINTENANCE
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
PROJ F.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECK CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
0000674 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE STMT
N
0000686 PAMELA LEE STMT
N
0000770 O.K. ASSOC. INC. REO
N
0000963 PACIFIC ALARM SVC. STMT
N
0000795 PAGENET 4471.782
N
0000795 PAGENET 4471781.
N
0001440 RCLEAA SiMT
N
0000846 RAMONA BUSINESS MACHINES 2720
N
0001031 SILVER BULLET 5674
N
0000440 SMART 6 FINAL 2696367
N
0000440 SMART 6 FINAL 2696367
N
0000440 SMART & FINAL 2696367
N
0000440 SMART 4 FINAL 2696367
N
0000373 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 95030559
N
0000307 XEROX CORPORATION 567630292
N
AMOUNT
.37.74
1.31.7.77
:I.10,546.88
292.00
:1.33.50
42.00
50.00
60.00
494.75
25.72
25.73
25.72
25.73
70.00
107.67
GROUP NUMBER 1 00272 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 10/1995
GROUP USER ANNE
1RANS;; TRANS DATE VOUCHER FK ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2
4600 04/11/1995
-1FR MATNIENANCE:.
4700 04/:L1/1995
COPIER MAINI'ENANCE.
4900 04/11/1995
COP TER MAIN FINANCE.
5000 04/11/1995
COPIER MAINTENANCE
5100 04/11/1995
COPIER MAINTENANCE
004644 00 010_-2500_.425.34--05
004645 00 010-7400-425.34-05
004647 00 01.0--4150-410.34--05
004640 00 010-2500-425.34-05
004649 00 010-3100--431..34-05
COUNT:
AMOl.1NT 1
GROUP TOTALS
50
152.986.85
PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECK CHECK DATE. TYPE LAST TRANS
0000307 XEROX
04/15/1995 0000000
0000307 XEROX
04/15/1995 0000000
0000307 XEROX
04/15/1995 0000000
0000307 XEROX
04/15/1995 0000000
0000307 XEROX
04/15/1995 0000000
CORPORATION
00/00/0000
CORPORATION
00/00/0000
CORPORATION
00/00/0000
CORPORATION
00/00/0000
CORPORATION
00/00/0000
567572702
N
45935853
N
45935856
N
45935866
N
45935843
N
AMOUNT
529.24
77.50
77.50
229.81
240.15
C.)ROLIP NUMBER
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
GROUP USER ANNE
00273 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
10/1995
TRANS* TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2
100 04/11/1995 004650
CHLORINE MINDERS
200 04/11/1995 004651
BACTFRTAL. ANALYSIS
.i00 04/1:1/1995 004652
DAC.:TE RIAI. ANALYSIS
400 04/11/1995 004653
BACTERIAL... ANALYSIS
500 04/11/1995 004654
.._,NDSCAF'E MAINTENANCE
600 04/11/1995 004655
TOWING SERVICES
700 04/1:1/1995 004656
CRIS UPGRADE
000 04/11/1995 004657
UTILITIES
00 050--9000-450.33-30
WATER DEPARTMENT
00 050-9000-•450.33-30
WATER DEPARTMENT
00 050-9000-450.33-30
WATER DEPARTMENT
00 050-9000-450.33-30
WATER DEPARTMENT
00 025--7256-410.30-90
00 019-3200-431.21-72
ENGINE +208/FIRE DEPT.
00 010-3100-431.34--05
POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 025-7250-41.0.35-10
900 04/11/1995 00465E 00
UTILITIES
:t000 04/1.1/:1.995
UTILITIES
1100 04/11/1995
TIRES 6 REPAIRS
.1200 04/11/1995
RES & REPAIRS
1300 04/11/1995
1 IRF9 h RE"1"A:EI v.
1400 04/11/1995
TIRES . REPAIRS
1500 04/1:1/1995
TTRFt; b, f<EF'ATRt;
025- 7254....4'J.0.3.....10
004659 00 025-7250-410.35-10
004660 00 019-3100--431.33--50
004661 00 019-3300-431.33-50
004662 00 019-41.00--41.0.33-50
004663 00 019-4150--41.0.33--50
004664 00 019--9000.-450.33-50
PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECK CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
0000924 ALL FORE CHEMICAL
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000949 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000949 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS
04/1.5/1.995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000949 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
I423'345
N
52293
N
52300
N
52373
N
7336 0000925 TOIDD BAGLEY LANDSCAPE 95-01.8
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000218 CASTELLANO'S TOWING SERV. 20041.,:1.8586
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001245 T.L. CREATES, INC.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
950370
N
0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST. STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST. STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATFR DIST. STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000483 EVANS TIRE_ CO.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000483 EVANS TIRE CO.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000483 EVANS TIRE CO.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000483 EVANS TIRE CO.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000483 EVANS TIRE CO.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
AMOUNT
1,525.49
22.00
:1.2.00
22.00
2,167.00
310.00
:L0,00
6.14
3.34
6.14
2,630.66
109.96
1,464,65
1,229.41
140.84
UROLJP NUMBER i 00273 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNI'INO F'ERIODI 10/1995
GROW' 11!3F'R ANNE
TRANS: FRANS DALE. VOUCHER PK ACCOUNT NUMBER
DE.SCRIPI TON 1. DESCRIPTION 2
1600 04/11/1995 004665 00 010---11:1.0-411..36--25
'161.. AuvF:RT:I:3 rNU
1700 04/11./1995 004666 00 021--4150-410.33-30
COLD MIX -PUBLIC WORKS
1800 01/11/1995 004667 00 010--2500--425.34-05
AS400 LEASE/PURCHASE
1900 04/11/1995
FLOOR RUNNERS
2000 04/11/1995
FLOOR RUNNERS
2100 04/11./199.5
UNIFORM CLEANING
2200 04/1:1./1995
UNIFORM CLEANING
2300 04/11/1995
'IF'17RM CLEANINI3
2400 04/11/1995
UNIFORM CLEANING
004668 00 010-2500-425.33-10
004669 00 010-3200-431.33-1.0
004670 00 010-4150-410.21--35
004671 00 019-4550- 410.21-35
004672 00 010--4100-410.21-35
004673 00 010-7400-425.33--10
2500 04/11/1995 004674 00
UNIFORM CLEANING
2600 04/11/1995 004675 00
UNIFORM CLEANING
2700 04/11/1995 004676 00
UNIFORM CLEANING
2800 04/11/1995 004677 00
I.JNIF'1'IRM Cl.EANIN(
2900 04/11/1995
ELooR RUNNERS
3000 04/11/1.996
UNIFORM CLEANING
055-41/0-450.21-35
010--41.50-410.21.-35
050-9000-450.21-35
010-3100--431.. 33--10
004678 00 01.0-• 1.'700- 41'7 . 33--:L O
004679 00 010-3300-"471..21-35
PRO..I P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECK: CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
0000566 HEMET NEWS
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000612 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT
04/15/1.995 0000000 00/00/0000
STMT
N
53"227:1.
N
0001093 I.P.M. CORPORATION'S-5T4 183:1.419
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
IJ
0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES BTMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT
04/15/1.995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
AMOUNT
322.80
250.06
3.2.1.4.48
34.29
50.14
25.12
149.33
33.33
21.10
70.05
75.32
115.44
47.48
12.33
33.33
GROUP NIJMBEi
.ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
GROUP USER ANNE
00273,,,,COUNTS PAYABLE
10/1995
TPANSO TRANS (DATE VOUCHER PK ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2
3100 04/11/1995 004680
UNIFORM CLEANING
3200 04/11/1995 004681
MANAGING DIVERSITY
3300 04/11/1995 004682
REPAIR MOTORCYCLE
3400 04/1.1/1995 004683
GRAPHICS -POLICE VEHICLES
3500 04/11./1995 004684
Y 1994-95 RDA ERAF
3600 04/11/1995 004605
F/Y 1994-95 RDA ERAF
:3700 04/11/1995 004686
F/Y :1.994--95 RDA ERAF
3800 04/1.1/1995 004687
BOOKING FEES--JANUARY 1.995
3900 04/1.1./1995 004688
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
4000 04/11/1995 004689
GRAFFITI REMOVAL.
4100 04/11/1995 004690
STEVFN MILLER V CITY
00 010-3210-431.21-35
00 010-3100-431.31-25
POST REIMBURSABLE
00 019-•3100-431.33- 50
POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 019-3100-431.33-50
00 092-9700--470.60--30
PAYMENT
00 097-9700-470.60-30
PAYMENT-
00 099-9700-470.60-30
PAYMENT
00 010-33100-431.30-19
POLICE UEPARMTNET
00 011-7400-425.11.
PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE_ NUMBER
DITE DATE CHECK CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001.049 PMW ASSOCIATES REO
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001475 PALM SPRINGS HARLEY DAVI11 3729
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001653 F'OLYCRAFT, INC. STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000077 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000877 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STMI'
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000877 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE STMI"
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001022 RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFS 1.0396
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
15 0000486 OFELIA SEGALA
00 025-7260--410.34-05
00 020-.2200-41.9.30-90
4200 04/11/1995 004691 00 010-3100-431.30-90
OOD DRAWS POLICE DEPARTMENT
4300 04/12/1995 004692 00
MASTERCARD STAI EMENI
4400 04/12/1995 004693 00
MASTERCARD STATEMENT
4500 04/1.2/1995 004694 00
MASTERCARD STATEMC::NI
010-1100--41.1.31. -20
050-9000--450.21--10
096-9700-470.30-90
REG
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000354 VALLEY TEEN FOUNDATION 277
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001829 W-SERF INC. STMI
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000317 WESTERN NURSE SPEC. STMI
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000499 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000499 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK STMT
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000499 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
STMI
N
AMOUNT
33.33
384.00
433.77
2,1.24.30
8,071..79
47,308.86
13,845.16
3.532.80
91.35
180.50
.1,050.00
230.00
206.42
11.0.79
23.20
F'r<013RAM: 0M3131.) ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST KE:.ruKI NIJMLl.K .°4
IdROIJP NUMBER 00273 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1.0/1995
l'3RO1JF' USER ANNE
1RANS11 Il°. AN S DA I F VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION
4600 04/12/1995 004695
NE SERVICES
4700 04/12/1995 004696
1110NF" SERVICES
4000 04/12/1995 004697
I'FIr1NI: F r'RVTr'r:`;
00
00
00
010.-2500--425. 35-1.6
010-3100-431.35-1.6
O 10-32 00--431.. 35--1 6
4900 04/12/1995 004690 00 010—.2500-425.35'-'1.6
PHONE SERVICES
5000 04/12/1995 004699 00 010-3100"-431.35-16
PHONE SERVICES
5100 04/12/1995 004700 00 010-7400-425.35-16
PHONE SERVICES
5200 04/1.2/1995 004701 00 02 5-7265-410.35-16
PHONE SERVICES
5300 04/12/7.995 004707 00 019-4550-410.35-16
1NF SERVICES
5400 04/12/1995 004703 00 025r-7256-410.35-16
PHONE SERVICES
5500 04/12/1995 004704
r1-IONE SERVICES
5600 04/12/1995 004705
PHONE SERVICES
5700 04/12/1995 004706
PHONE SERVICES
5000 04/12/1995 004707
MAINTENANCE—.COMMIJNICATI:ON
5900 04/12/1995 004708
LNTERIM—FINANCE DIRECTOR
COUNT:
AMOUNT:.
00 010-2500-425.35-16
00 050--9000-450.35.16
00 055-4170— 450.35-1.6
00 010-2500-425.34
EQUIPMENT
r'RO.J P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECK CHECK HATE TYPE LAST 1RANS
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
04/15/7.995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
04/1.5/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
05 0001755 NOR'rF_L COMMUNICATIONS
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
00 010-1.400-414.34--05
(GROUP TOTALS
59
90.97.5.87
0001.831 LARRY WEAVER
04/15/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
STMT
N
SYS STMT
N
STMT
N
AMOUNT
409 .2 7
972.79
7.34.9E
242.00
465.22
105.70
109.65
28.73
51.74
48.07
140.35
110.22
590.40
3.796.25
C
C
7S A N
JACINTO
Au :NDA
Staff Report
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Laurie Mora, Deputy City Clerk
DATE: April 18, 1995
RE: Claim - Soboba Spring Country Club, File #JS 95-15
RECOMMENDATION: Reject the claim as recommended by the claims adjustor,
pursuant to Government Code Section 913.
COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT POWERS
INSURANCE AUTHORITY
March 28, 1995
Laurie Mora
Deputy City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
312 East Main Street
San Jacinto, CA 92583
RE: Soboba Springs Country Club v. City of San *into
Loss Date : 02/12/95
Our File No. : JS 95-15
Dear Ms. Mora:
We are in receipt of the above -captioned claim for damages filed with the City of San Jacinto
from Soboba Springs Country Club.
We request that you take the action indicated below:
CLAIM REJECTION: Written rejection of claim by authorized board/officer in accordance with Government Code Section 913.
LATE CLAIM: Do NOT reject claim but RETURN it for failure to file within time limit prescribed in Government Code Section
911.2. Transmittal NOT to contain "WARNING" required by Section 913, but should advise that the recourse to file "Application
for Leave to File Late Claim" as provided in Government Code Section 911.4. This must be returned within 45 days of the date
claim mailed or delivered.
[
INSUFFICIENT CLAIM: Send notice of insufficiency for failure to comply with Government Code Section 910 and/or 910.2 and/or
910.4 and cite the following specific insufficiencies:
This must be sent within 20 days of your receipt of claim.
AMENDED CLAIM: Reject claim as set forth in first paragraph above, CLAIM REJECTION.
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE CLAIM: Reject the Application under Government Code Section 911.8.
OPERATION OF LAW: Defer any written response pending our further advice.
Please provide us with a copy of any response requested above. If you have any questions,
please contact the CVJPIA office.
Vejy tru `y yours,
enniss M ol10
Claims Manager
DMM/1c
73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 200, Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 341-0492 FAX (619) 340-5949
S A N
JAC I NTO
Staff Report
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Laurie Mora, Deputy City Clerk
DATE: April 18, 1995
RE: Claim - Randy Butler, File #JS 95-16
RECOMMENDATION: Reject the claim as recommended by the claims adjustor,
pursuant to Government Code Section 913.
APR-12-1995 10:10 FROM
LVAG
TO 19096543728 P.02
March 29, 1995
Laurie Mora
Deputy City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
312 East Main Street
San Jacinto, CA 92583
RE: Sutler. Randy v. City of San Jacinto
Loss Date : 03/14/95
Our File No. : JS 95-16
Dear Ms. Mora:
COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT POWERS
INSURANCE AUTHORITY
1110
We are in receipt of the above -captioned claim for damages filed with the City of San Jacinto
by claimant Randy Butter.
We request that you take the action indicated below:
CLAIM REJECTION: Written rejection of claim by authorized board/officer in accordance with Government Code Section 913.
[ 1 LATE CLAIM: Do NOT reject claim but RETURN it for failure to file within time limit prescribed In Government Code Section
911.2. Transmittal NOT to contain 'WARNING' requited by Section 913. but should advise that the recourse to file 'Application
for Leave to File Late Claim" as provided in Government Code Section 911.4. This most be returned withm 45 days of the date
claim mailed or delivered.
INSUFFICIENT CLAIM: Send nonce of insufficiency for fadute to comply with Government Code Section 910 and/or 910.2 and/or
910.4 and cite the following specific insufficiencies:
This nutty be sent within 20 days of your recaps of claim
AMENDED CLAIM: Reject claim as sat forth in first paragtapb above. CLAIM REJECTION.
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE CLAIM Reject the Application under Government Code Section 911 5.
OPERATION OF LAW: Defer any written response pending our further advice.
Please provide us with a copy of any response requested above. If you have any questions,
please contact the CVJPTA office.
ly yours,
Dennis M. Moll
Claims Manager
DMM/lc
ed?
73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 200, Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 341-0492 FAX (619) 340-5949
Ate .NDA
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Larry L. Weaver, Interim Finance Director
Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
SUBJ: CVJPIA Agreement Amendment
DATE: April 18, 1995
• RECOMMENDATION:
p
r
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached
Resolution which amends the Joint Powers Agreement, allowing
the authority to terminate CVAG'S role as administrator and
supervisor of the authority. With this action, the CVAG in
lieu dues will be phased out by FY 1997-98 and allow the
joint powers staff to have complete administrative
responsibility and authority over the affairs of the JPA.
BACKGROUND
The CVJPIA was formed in July of 1985 by seven cities who
were also members of CVAG. Since the CVAG member cities
formed the JPA, they thought it was necessary for the
Executive Director of CVAG to have administrative and
supervisory control of the actions and policies of the
authority.
Non CVAG cities who joined the JPA were forced to pay in
lieu dues to CVAG for the privilege of being a participant
of the JPA.
RESOLUTION NO. 95
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT
POWERS AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE MACEELLA VALLEY
JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 25 of the Joint Powers
Agreement creating the Coachella Valley Joint Powers
Insurance Authority, dated July 25, 1985, the City of San
Jacinto hereby resolves to amend the Joint Powers Agreement,
as follows:
AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT creating
the COACT ELLIA VALLEY JOINT POWERS INSURANCE
AUTHORITY SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE IF THERE IS A
TWO-THIRDS FAVORABLE VOTE.
WHEREAS, neither CVAG, its Executive Committee, or its
employees shall have any powers or duties with respect to
the supervision or control of the Authority.
WHEREAS, CVAG shall continue as a Member organization with
voting rights. WRCOG (Western Riverside Council of
Governments) heretofore a Member organization without vote
shall hence forth have the vote as any other Member
organization.
WHEREAS, in lieu dues required to be paid by Member
organizations to CVAG shall remain unchanged, but be phased
out, as follows:
FY 1995-96 - 100% dues
FY 1996-97 - 50% dues
Thereafter - 0% dues
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council
of the City of San Jacinto hereby approve the proposed
amendment to the CVJPIA joint powers agreement as provided
by the MOU dated March 29, 1995 and made part of the
resolution.
MOVED, PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 18th day of April 1995
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATION
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution
No. duly adopted by the said City Council of the City of
San Jacinto on the date set forth therein.
Deputy City Clerk
Mayor Pro-Tem
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT POWERS
INSURANCE AUTHORITY
PLEASE NOTE IMMEDIATE ACTION IS REQUESTED.
MEMO
DATE: March 31, 1995
TO: Board of Directors/Alternates
FROM: Robert S. Hallock
General Manager
SUBJECT: Proposed Staff Report and Recommendation to Amend the Joint Powers
Agreement
Enclosed is a proposed staff report and recommendation for your use to present to your
governing body to adopt a resolution which amends the Joint Powers Agreement for the
Authority to separate CVAG's role as administrator and supervisor of the Authority.
If you find the proposed staff report and recommendation helpful, please present it to your
governing body at the first available opportunity for action and return to this office a signed
copy of the resolution, if approved. Two-thirds vote of the Member organizations is necessary
to amend the JPA. Thank you.
enclosures
amendjpa.mmo
73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 200, Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 341-0492 FAX (619) 340-5949
COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT POWERS
INSURANCE AUTHORITY
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ITEM TITLE: Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement Establishing
the Coachella Valley Joint Powers Insurance Authority
PREPARED BY: Staff
REQUESTED BY: (Name of CVJPIA Director)
TYPE OF BOARD CONSIDERATION:
Action X
Information
Receive and File
RECOMMENDATION:
Amend JPA per Exhibit A.
It is the recommendation of your representative and the other directors of the Coachella Valley Joint Powe-
Insurance Authority that you adopt a resolution amending the Joint Powers Agreement severing ties betwe,
CVAG and its Executive Committee as administrators of the Authority, while retaining CVAG as a voting
member. The resolution also grants WRCOG voting status.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
An elimination of "In —Lieu Dues" for non—CVAG members over a three year period. Reduction in
administration costs.
BACKGROUND & OVERVIEW:
The Authority was established in July of 1985 with seven founding members. Since then, it has grown to
twenty—six members. Originally, the Member organizations who were also members of CVAG maintained
administrative and supervisory control of the actions and policies of the Authority. This was thought necessary
for the fledgling organization. Over time, the experience of the organization and expertise of its board members
resulted in a consideration that the Authority ought to be independent. To this end, meetings between CVJPT
and CVAG have produced the attached Memorandum of Understanding that the CVJPIA should no longer
under the control of CVAG. This signed agreement is the basis for a recommendation that the Member
organizations of the CVJPIA amend the Joint Powers Agreement in accordance with the attached proposed
amendment to eliminate CVAG's administration and control of the CVJPIA.
EXHD3IT "A"
RESOLVED:
Pursuant to Article 25 of the Joint Powers Agreement creating the Coachella Valley Joint Powers
Insurance Authority, dated July 25, 1985, the (Member Organization) hereby resolves to
amend the Joint Powers Agreement, as follows:
AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT creating the
COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY
EFFECTIVE , 1995.
Neither CVAG, its Executive Committee, or its employees shall have any powers or duties with
respect to the supervision or control of the Authority.
CVAG shall continue as a Member organization with voting rights. WRCOG (Western
Riverside Council of Governments) heretofore a Member organization without vote shall hence
forth have the vote as any other Member organization.
In lieu dues required to be paid by Member organizations to CVAG shall remain unchanged, but
be phased out, as follows:
FY 1995-96 — 100% dues
FY 1996-97 — 50% dues
Thereafter — 0% dues
MEMBER ORGANIZATION
By
TITLE
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDLNG
This Agreement is made and entered into this 24th day of
March , 1995, by
and between the Coachella Valley Association of Governments ("CVAG") and the Authority as
defined in the Joint Powers Agreement cmaring the Coachella Valley Joint Powers Insurance
Authority (the "Authority") effective July 15, 1985.
Now, therefore, the parties agree as follows:
(a) The aforementioned Joint Powers Agreement will forthwith be amended by the parties
so as to delete references to or participation by CVAG in the Authority, except to the extent that
CVAG is a member thereof for insurance purposes;
(b) Current CVAG employees Robert Hallock, Dennis Molloy. Scott Ellerbrock and Linda
Cehr, will be entitled to become Authority employees upon the adoption of the proposed
amendment. If they do become so employed, they each shall enjoy their existing seniority rights and
shall continue to receive all employee benefits now available to them under the CVAG Employee
Benefits package, attached hereto marked Exhibit "A". Otherwise, nothing herein shall prohibit the
Authority from making such employee benefits, rules, or regulations as its discretion permits.
(c) The Authority shall continue to occupy the space in CVAG's office premises which it
now occupies and shall continue to do so through the balance of CVAG's orinai lease term
(expiring August, 1996). The Authority shall pay its proportional share, based on square footage,
of the total leasehold rent.
(d) The Authority shall continue to pay CVAG in -Lieu dues according to the following
schedule:
FY 1995/96 - 100% Dues
FY 1996/97 - 50% Dues
Thereafter, 0% Dues
(e) CVAG tall be entitled to all voting rights of the Authority.
(±) 'Western Riveside Council of Governments (WRCOG) heretofore a member organization
without vote shall be entitled to all voting rights of the Authority.
Coachella Valley Joint Powers Insurance Authority Coachella Valley Association of Governments
(CVJPIA) (CVAG)
3,7
ate: ;Wi 9 /y9�
Date:
�Lu ► J a .
3J3//
C
C
Aud 4DA 5.8
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
kW
FROM: Larry L. Weaver, Interim Finance Director
Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
SUBJ: Fiscal Year 1994-95 Auditing Services
DATE: April 18, 1995
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the City Council approve the auditing
services proposal from Conrad & Associates for Fiscal Year
1994-95 in the amount of $27,235.00 and authorize the City
Manager to sign the audit proposal. The proposed fee
represents a 2 1/2 percent increase over last year.
Staff also recommends the finance department be authorized
to prepare a RFP for auditing services for Fiscal Year 1995-
96 and subsequent years not to exceed five years.
BACKGROUND
The City of San Jacinto entered into an agreement for
auditing services with Conrad & Associates on Max 7, 1991
with an option to extend the agreement through Fiscal Year
1994-95.
CONRAD
ASSOCIATES
• PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
Larry L. Weaver, Interim Finance Director
City of San Jacinto
P.O. Box 488
San Jacinto, California 92383
Dear Mr. Weaver:
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
1100 MAIN STREET, SUITE C
IRVINE. CALIFORNIA 92714
(714) 4742020
March 28, 1995
Conrad & Associates is desirous of an on -going relationship in serving as independent
auditors for the City of San Jacinto for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995.
Our agreement for auditing services dated May 7, 1991 includes an option to extend the
term of our services to fiscal year ended June 30, 1995.
We agree to perform the required services in accordance with our agreement dated May
7, 1991. We would agree to a cost of living increase of 2 1/2% over our 1994 fee as
follows:
City of San Jacinto (including A-128
single audit) - general fund
Enterprise Funds
Water
Sewer
1995 Maximum Contract Amount
$18,157
1,869
1,869
San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency 5.340
Not to exceed fee, including out of pocket expenses $27.235
Hourly rates in effect for 1995 for additional accounting or technical assistance that the
City may request would be based upon the experience level of assistance requested as
follows:
Classification Hourly Rate
Partner $105
Manager 90
Supervisor 68
Senior Accountant 59
Staff Accountant 49
MEMBERS OF AICPA AND CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
MEMBER OF AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS PRIVATE COMPANIES PRACTICE SECTION
Larry L. Weaver, Interim Finance Director
City of San Jacinto
March 28, 1995
Page Two
The above rates include reimbursement for all out of pocket expenses.
If the above meets with your understanding, you may sign and return the enclosed
duplicate of this letter.
MAH:dac
2732H
Enclosure
Accepted:
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
By:
Title:
Date:
Very truly yours,
CONRAD & ASSOCIATES
M/444,
Michael A. Harrison, CPA
Partner
S A N
JACINTO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Gene Price, Interim Fire Chief f E
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: April 18, 1995
RE: Computer Bid
RECOMMENDATION:
t DA 5.9
Staff Report
Approve by Minute Order that the City Council Adopt the Bid Procedures of the
City Of Hemet to allow San Jacinto to utilize their pricing to purchase computer
equipment for the City.
BACKGROUND:
Recently the City of Hemet secured bids for computer equipment. The equipment that
was bid included the Central Processing Unit, the monitor, and the mouse. The
process used by Hemet conforms with the procedures that would be used by San
Jacinto in a bid process. The successful bidder, New Technologies, stated they would
honor their bid prices to San Jacinto, if Hemet gave approval to them. This approval
has been secured.
San Jacinto Ordinance No. 933 allows the City to adopt the bids and procedures
utilized by another public entity, city, or district within this state. This can be
accomplished by minute order upon recommendation of the Purchasing
Officer/Designee of the City. I have attached the staff report from Hemet awarding the
bid.
Staff Report
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Rod Watkins, Assistant City Manager; Joseph P. Guzzetta, City Manager
DATE: December 13, 1994
RE: Award computer bid.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is requested that the City Council award this computer bid to New Technologies of Santa Fe
Springs, CA for 70 computer workstations in the amount of $87,972.50 and reject all other bids.
Also approve the software for these workstations to be purchased through the established State Bid
in the amount of $25,989.95.
ANALYSIS:
On October 25, 1994, the City Council approved a supplemental budget in the amount of $213,000.
This acquisition is the first purchase phase that will be applied to the budget. Bid #9415 will establish
a vendor to purchase 70 PC workstations needed to upgrade existing outdated PC workstations. The
bid establishes a per unit price for each item (the C.P.U. - or Central Processing Unit, the monitor,
and the mouse). This was done so units could be purchased as needed over a specified period of time
sparing the need to warehouse equipment on -site. On November 30, 1994 the purchasing department
received sealed bids for computer hardware. New Technologies was the low bidder and met all City
hardware specification requirements. The results of bid #9415 are as follows (includes tax and
shipping):
Vendor NameAionit
Personal$
; Computer
Personal
Computer #2
or
Mouse
Trackball
—4
�
New Technologies
S981.69
S868.21
S218.91
$36.29
$76.00
Syslink Computer Corp.
$1,129.52
$995.91
$287.07
$48.49
$80.81
Minco Computers
$1,185.25
S1,023.63
$307.09
$48.49
$74.35
AC Data Systems
$1,319.24
$1,116.53
$269.92
$48.78
$79.13
Western Data
$1,394.29
$1,227.87
$235.07
$66.81
$98.05
JB Computers ✓
$1,346.88
$1,185.25
$317.86
$48.49
$95.90
Complete Business Systems
$1,394.06
$1,186.10
$283.23
$40.41
$83.51
TBIComputers /
$1,538.00
$1,344.00
$239.00
$30.00
$71.00
Professional Computing
$2,329.82
$1,499.07
$332.18
$60.64
$111.29
✓ - Local vendors.
1
The State awarded master contract 1-93-70-01 to ValCom/Software Galena for the purpose of
providing the State, County, and Local Governments with the best possible pricing on software. We
will be purchasing 70 - Windows 3.11, 70 - Borland Office Suite 2.0, and 100 GroupWise 4.1
software licenses.
ALTERNATIVES:
Local bidders quoted prices 38% to 45% higher than New Technologies, therefore no alternatives
are suggested.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The 1994 certificate of participation will fund the equipment with debt service payments from
depreciation reserves. There will be no increases in charges to departments during the upcoming
year.
Respectfully submitted,
Tom Aronson
Information Systems Manager
r■41114
10114
J A N
JACINTO
Ai(ENDA 5 •/ C
Staff Report
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Gene Price, Interim Fire Chief
Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: April 18, 1995
RE: Wildland Fire Protection Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Resolution No. 95- establishing an agreement for Wildland Fire
Protection with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.
FISCAL IMPACT:
FY 94/95
FY 95/96
$ 3,975.71
$15,883.86
The money for FY 94/95 has been budgeted in this year's Fire Department budget.
BACKGROUND:
In May of 1993, the City of San Jacinto signed an agreement with the California
Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to provide wildland fire protection to the
area of the City, known as Annexation 66, in the Juniper Hills area. At that time, it was
a condition of the annexation and was imposed by the Local Agency Formation
Commission of Riverside County. The condition was stipulated to provide the same, or
equal level of wildland fire protection that existed before the annexation. The term of
the original agreement was from November 1, 1993 thru June 30, 1994.
In October of 1994, it was determined that the agreement had not been extended. The
State was in the process of revising the format of all their contracts and we were
informed we would be contacted as soon as the revision was completed. We have
received the proposed contract for your consideration. The term of the agreement is
from April 1, 1995 to June 30, 1996.
The total acreage remains the same at 2105 acres. The original agreement was $6.00
an acre and the new agreement is $6.79 an acre. Both agreements stipulated an
administrative charge of 11.13%. The payments will be made separately for each fiscal
year.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
ESTABLISHING AN AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION AND THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO FOR THE PROVISION OF WILDLAND FIRE PROTECTION IN CERTAIN
AREAS OF THE NEWLY ADOPTED ANNEXATION NO. 66 FOR PERIOD APRIL 1,
1995 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1996
WHEREAS, Section 4142 of the Public Resources Code provides that the
Director of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection may enter into
cooperative agreements with local jurisdictions for the purpose of providing wildland fire
protection; and
WHEREAS, The City of San Jacinto has the responsibility for protection of life,
property, and wildland areas indicated on the plat attached to the Agreement hereto
and marked "Exhibit A" of the attached Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the State has agreed to and has represented that it has the ability to
provide basic wildland fire protection for said area, of the type and degree which it not
provides on adjacent State Responsibility Areas.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN JACINTO that in consideration of the rights and duties set forth in the attached
Agreement, it does hereby agree to the said attached Agreement with the California
Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of April, 1995 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CERTIFICATION
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. 95- duly adopted by the
said City Council of the said City of San Jacinto on the date therein set forth.
City Clerk
- 00 I
AGREEMENT FOR WI L D LAN D FIRE
PROTECTION WITHIN LOCAL
RESPONSIBILITY AREA BETWEEN
CITY OF S AN JAC I NTO
AND
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION
RIVERSIDE RANGER UNIT
1.
00
ROUTING TEE= LIST
LOCAL RESPONSIBILITY AREA wT LOLAN•D FIRE PROTECT/ON AAE2-ENI/AMENDMENT
LOCAL AGENCY
RANGER UNIT
Prepares 6 complete original
agreements/amenaments,w.ch exhibits,
signed by Erie auchoclreo local agency
official.
Provides two copies of autnori_atlon
for local agency official to execute
the agreement/amendment.
Prepares 2 signed STD.15, Contract
Transmittal Forms.
Prepares narrative introduction (new
agreements only).
Prepares 4 copies of Budget Plan.
Includes topograohic map of agreement
area (New agreements or :evlseC areas
ONLY) .
Includes copy of annual report if
being submitted with
agreement/amendment.
Forwards complete package with znis
check list on cop to reoicn office.
2. REGION OFFICE
Reviews package for completeness.
Region Chief reccmmencs execution of
the agreement/amendment by signing
all copies.
Forwards complete package with this
checklist to the Deputy Chief Local
Government in _na floe oratect::n
section.
3. COOPERATIVE FIRE PROGRAMS
Deputy Chief Local Government reviews
for completeness, accuracy, ant
compliance with department policy anc
recommence execution oy signing STD.
15, Contract Transmittal .Form, above
ranger unit signature.
Retains 2 photocopies of '_c e: Plan
and a copy operating plan for fire
protection files.
Forwards one copy of budget plan cc
budget office and one to accounting.
Forwards topographic map to SRA
mapping.
Deputy Director for fire orotection
executes agreement for the oepartmenc
by signing all copies.
Forwards complete package co
contracts office.
(7/6/94)
CONTRACTS OFFICE:
Logs and stamps agreement/amenament
anti assigns contract/amendment
numoer.
Reviews for general contract
requirements.
Retains suspense copy of complete
package in contract file.
Forwards STD. 15, Contract
Transmittal Form and 5 original '
copies of the agreement/amendment to
Department of General Services legal.
Receives 4 fully executed copies of
one agreement/amendment to Department
of General Services.
Transmits suspense cony of the
agreement/amendment to the accounting
office.
Retains 1 fully executed
agreement/amendment in contract file.
Transmits notice of completed
contract to Deputy Chief Local
Government.
Fora:es 3 fully executeo
agreements/amendments and :his cneck
_is: to the region.
5. REGION OFFICE
Retains 1 fully executed
agreement/amendment for region office
.::es.
_araares 2 full, execucec
agreements/amendments aria tnls cneck
List to the ranger unit.
6. RANGER UNIT
Forwards I fully executed original
cony of one agreement/amendment to
one local agency.
:._tales one fully executed copy of
the ag:eemen:/amen cent and this
cnecx list for the ranger unit files.
00 3
INTRODUCTION
On June 1, 1993, approved by of the Local Agency Formation Com-
mission of Riverside County (LAFCO), Annexation #66 with the City
of San Jacinto. All public safety responsibilities were to be
borne by the city. Prior to Annexation #66 the area was classi-
fied as "State Responsibility Area" with all wildland fire pro-
tection responsibility being with the California Department of
Forestry and Fire Protection, Riverside Ranger Unit.
The area inclusive of Annexation #66 is bordered by the Ramona
Expressway to the north, Warren Road to the east, and the "Juni-
per Hills" to the west, totaling 2105 acres.
As a part of the Annexation #66 approval, LAFCO stipulated that
the City of San Jacinto was to provide the same, or equal, level
of wildland fire protection as provided by the California Depart-
ment of Forestry and Fire Protection, Riverside Ranger Unit. On
June 1, 1993, the City of San Jacinto and the California Depart-
ment of Forestry and Fire Protection, Riverside Ranger Unit
entered into an LRA wildland Fire Protection Agreement. The text
hereafter is a new agreement between the two agencies for the
period from April 1, 1995 through June 30, 1996.
00 4
AGREEMENT FOR PROTECTION OF WILDLANDS WITHIN LOCAL AGENCY
THIS AGREEMENT, made this 1st day of April, 1995 by and between
the State of California, Department of Forestry and Fire
Protection, through its duly appointed and qualified Director,
hereinafter called STATE, and the City of San Jacinto, County of
Riverside, State of California, hereinafter called LOCAL AGENCY.
RECITALS
1. Section 4142 of the Public Resources Code provides that the
Director may enter into cooperative Agreements with local
jurisdictions for the purpose of providing wildland fire
protection.
2. LOCAL AGENCY has the responsibility for protection of life,
property, and wildland areas comprising 2105 acres of land
as indicated on the map attached hereto and marked "Exhibit
A", and desires to contract with the STATE to provide
wildland fire protection to said area.
3. STATE has the ability to provide wildland fire protection
for said area, of the type and degree which it now provides
on adjacent State Responsibility Areas.
4. STATE shall provide wildland fire protection for the areas
defined in paragraph 2., above, in accordance with the
following:
For those areas which are adjacent to State Responsibility
Area STATE will provide wildland fire protection at the same
level of service it now provides on adjacent State
Responsibility Area.
For those areas (islands) which are not adjacent to State
Responsibility Area the wildland fire protection provided by
the STATE will be limited to those resources identified in
the preplanned wildland response for the respective area.
Any resources beyond those specified in the preplanned
wildland response are assistance by hire and the financial
responsibility of the LOCAL AGENCY.
5. LOCAL AGENCY shall pay STATE for providing said protection
at the rate of $6.79 per acre, plus an 11.13% administrative
charge for a total of $19,859.57 upon presentation of an
invoice by STATE. The rate per acre and administrative fee
will be calculated by STATE prior to January 1, of each year
and annually thereafter, for the succeeding fiscal year
subject to approval by LOCAL AGENCY. This agreement shall
be amended each fiscal year to reflect new rates.
00
6. LOCAL AGENCY agrees that STATE may dispatch fire protection
resources available under this agreement to other areas of
the state when needed at the sole discretion of STATE.
7. STATE response will be subject to availability of resources.
8. Incident Management within the contract area shall conform
to current Incident Command System criteria for Unified
Command.
9. LOCAL AGENCY shall provide mutual aid response into the
contract area for wildfires. Structural fire protection
remains the jurisdictional and financial responsibility of
LOCAL AGENCY.
10. STATE and LOCAL AGENCY shall, through established dispatch
procedures, immediately notify each other of any fire
incident within the contract area.
11. Prior to April 1 of each year, STATE and LOCAL AGENCY shall
establish a joint Operating Plan for the contract area,
which shall be attached hereto as "Exhibit B". If LOCAL
AGENCY receives its structural fire protection from another
local agency, the local agency providing the structural fire
protection must be party to the Operating Plan.
12. STATE shall provide thirty (30) day written notice to LOCAL
AGENCY of the cost per acre and the administrative charge to
be charged for each subsequent fiscal year during the term
of this agreement; LOCAL AGENCY shall have thirty (30) days
to approve said rate; if written approval is not received by
STATE within said period, STATE's obligations hereunder
shall terminate; LOCAL AGENCY shall be liable for all
amounts due up to and including the date of such
termination.
13. Unless there is written notice of intention not to renew
this agreement STATE shall extend this agreement for a
single one-year period from the original termination date.
The cost of services provided by STATE during the extended
period shall be based upon the rates published for the
fiscal year in which the extended period fall had a new
agreement been entered into.
14. To the extent that the Constitution and the laws of the
State of California permit, STATE and LOCAL AGENCY agree to
indemnify and to hold each other harmless against and from
any and all liability for claims on account of property
damage, personal injuries, or death resulting from the
negligent acts of the other party, its officers, employees,
agents, and subcontractors in connection with the
performance of this Agreement.
2
00 6
15. If the agreement is over $10,000, the parties shall, in
accordance with Government Code Section 10532, be subject to
examination and audit of the State Auditor General for a
period of three (3) years after final payment under the
agreement. Examination and audit shall be confined to those
matters connected with performance of the agreement
including, but not limited to, cost of administering the
agreement.
16. Notices required or permitted under this agreement shall be
sent through U.S. Postal Service by certified mail. Notice
shall be considered given upon deposit. Addresses for any
such notices shall be:
For STATE :
California Department of Forestry
and Fire Protection
J. M. Harris
Riverside Ranger Unit
210 West San Jacinto Avenue
Perris, CA 92570
For LOCAL AGENCY:
Pam Easter, City Manager
City of San Jacinto
312 East Main Street
San Jacinto, CA 92583
A change of address may be made in writing at any time by
either party.
17. Failure of either party to meet any of the terms and
conditions of this agreement, including non-payment of
monies due hereunder, shall be cause for the termination of
this agreement; such termination shall become effective upon
receipt of written notice of cancellation.
18. The term of this agreement is from April 1, 1995 to June 30,
1996.
19. During the performance of this contract, contractor and its
subcontractors shall not lawfully discriminate, harass or
allow harassment, against any employee or applicant for
employment because of sex, race, color, ancestry, religious
creed, national origin, physical disability (including HIV
and AIDS), mental disability, medical condition (cancer),
age (over 40), marital status, and denial of family care
leave. Contractors and subcontractors shall ensure that the
evaluation and treatment of their employees and applicants
for employment are free such discrimination and harassment.
Contractors and subcontractors shall comply with provisions
of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code,
Section 12900 et seq.) and the applicable regulations
promulgated thereunder (California Code of Regulations,
Title 2, Section 7285.0 et seq.). The applicable regulations
of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing
Government Code, Section-12990 (a-f), set forth in Chapter 5
of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Code of
Regulations are incorporated into this contract by reference
3
00 7
and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. Contractor
and its subcontractors shall give written notice of their
obligations under this clause to labor organizations with
which they have a collective bargaining or other agreement.
This contractor shall include the nondiscrimination and
compliance provisions of this clause in all subcontracts to
perform work under the contract.
20. This agreement may be amended at any time by written mutual
consent of the parties hereto.
21. The following are definitions of terms used in this
agreement.
FIRE PREVENTION: Includes all aspects of preventing wildland
fires.
FIRE PROTECTION: Is a general term implying an overall
defense against wildland fires. It consists of two major
elements; fire prevention and fire control (which implies
fire containment and/or suppression or extinguishment).
FIRE SUPPRESSION: Refers to extinguishing or "putting out"
wildland fires.
NON -FIRE SEASON: That period of time in fall, winter, and
spring that wildland fires are not likely to occur.
STATE RESPONSIBILITY AREA (SRA): Refers to those lands
classified by the State Board of Forestry (under P.R.C. 4125
and following) as being the areas in which the financial
responsibility for preventing and suppressing fires
(excluding those on Federally -controlled lands, or those
within city limits) is primarily the responsibility of the
State.
WILDFIRE: Means a fire burning uncontrolled on lands covered
wholly or in part by timber, brush, grass, grain, or other
flammable vegetation.
WILDLAND FIRE PROTECTION: That level of fire protection
which CDF provides to the State Responsibility Areas
throughout California.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
Agreement as of the date first hereinabove written.
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PROTECTION
RANGER UNIT CHIEF
By:
Sidoaore
J. M. Harris
LOCAL AGENCY:
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
By:
Simone
Primed Name Parted Name
Ranger Unit Chief Mayor
Tida Title
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
SERVICES
AND FIRE PROTECTION AREA CHIEF
By:
simaaw<
Glen J. Newman
Rimd Name
South Area Chief
Tide
DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY
AND FIRE PROTECTION REGION CHIEF
By:
Sicoaore
James E. Owen
Pained Name
Region Chief
Title
CDF DIRECTOR
By:
Slower.
Pained Name
Deputy Director for Fire Protection
Tide
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL
00 8
a,
1
EXHIBIT 'IAI'
SAN JACINTO WILDLAND
FIRE PROTECTION AGREEMENT
2105 ACRES
(MAP NOT TO SCALE)
ti 00 9
I eonr,
IH110 III'°
I it II I; :i II II
e
•
1A}
IF
p',(tate
19
EXHIBIT "B"
0010
OPERATING PLAN Date:
TO THE AGREEMENT FOR WILDLAND FIRE PROTECTION
WITHIN LOCAL RESPONSIBILITY AREA
BETWEEN
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
AND
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY & FIRE PROTECTION
RIVERSIDE RANGER UNIT
0011
OPERATING PLAN
Table of Contents
Page
Identification of the State
& Local Agency Involved 01
Authority of Plan 01
Purpose of Plan 01
Definitions & Restrictions 01
Procedures 01
General Procedures 02
Fire Prevention 03
Signatures 07
APPENDIX
Pre -Planned Riverside Ranger Unit Response A-1
Pre -Planned City of San Jacinto Response A-2
OPERATING PLAN
WHO
0012
This Operating Plan is between the California Department of
Forestry & Fire Protection, Riverside Ranger Unit and City of San
Jacinto. It has been developed to specifically discuss the
contractural agreement with CDF and the City of San Jacinto for
Wildland Fire Protection within the city limits.
AUTHORITY FOR PLAN
The Operating Plan is required of both agencies by the master
agreement between the CDF and the City of San Jacinto for Wild -
land Fire Protection within Local Agency dated April 1, 1995,
herein after referred to as AGREEMENT.
PURPOSE OF PLAN
This Operating Plan will provide the Chief Officers of both
agencies a means for executing the AGREEMENT AND is "Exhibit "B"
to that AGREEMENT.
DEFINITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS
See AGREEMENT for definitions and descriptions of general terms.
This Operating Plan does not allow either agency to operate
outside the limitations stated in the AGREEMENT and any existing
automatic mutual aid agreements.
PROCEDURES
A. Fire reporting/reports - When the City of San Jacinto Fire
Department receives a report of a wildfire within the area
covered by the AGREEMENT, it will promptly notify the River-
side Ranger Unit emergency command center. Each agency will
process their appropriate reports and make the information
available to the other upon request no later than 60 days.
B. Incident Management - The Incident Command System (ICS) will
be used to manage wildfires within the AGREEMENT area. A
Unified Command Structure will be implemented with a CDF
representative and a City of San Jacinto Fire Department
representative.
0013
AGREEMENT Area Fires - each agency will maintain a pre -
planned response for fires within the AGREEMENT area.
Immediate cooperation between agency dispatch centers will
occur to insure commonality in resource utilization. State
resources will be ordered consistent with the terms of the
AGREEMENT through the Riverside Ranger Unit ECC. Any State
augmentation to the pre -planned State response must be
authorized by a CDF Officer. Augmentation above pre -planned
response may require through post audit that adjacent CDF
Direct Protection Area was threatened, or that the augmenta-
tion was justified on a cost efficiency basis. Local gov-
ernment and private resources will be ordered through the
City of San Jacinto Fire Department Dispatch Center to
insure proper utilization of the Master Mutual Aid Agree-
ment.
D. Mutual Aid - for the purpose of this agreement, all initial
attack resources will be considered mutual aid.
E. Initial Attack - Initial Attack resources will always be
based on the closest forces concept as identified in the
pre -planned initial attack response areas.
F. Move -Up and Cover - Station coverage will be exchanged
between both agencies when appropriate. Normally, covering
agency engines should be replaced with specific agency
resources as soon as possible to prevent long term coverage
problems.
G. Fire Information - Nothing in the operation of a Joint
Public Information Center would preclude agency internal
information policy or procedure.
Unified Command Fire:
1. Representatives of both agencies will meet as needed to
discuss procedures and locations of potential Informa-
tion Centers. Both agencies will strive to keep per-
sonnel certified in the field of Public Information for
use during emergencies.
2. The Unified Command will determine which agency will
provide the lead Information Officer, but normally it
would be the agency with the greatest commitment of
resources.
2
0014
H. Parties to this agreement (Chief Officer level) may order
resources directly form each other's Emergency Com
mand/Dispatch Centers when an immediate need exists. These
resources include engines, fire crews, bulldozers, in ac-
cordance with the AGREEMENT. The closest forces concept
will be utilized.
6. GENERAL PROCEDURES
Each agencies' representative and Emergency Command/Dispatch
Center personnel will meet annually to discuss, review, and
update boundary fire dispatching, AGREEMENT area dispatch-
ing, fire reporting procedures, and exchange information
which would affect the other agency.
7 FIRE PREVENTION
A. POLICY
All fire prevention activities conducted on lands,
within the AGREEMENT area will be consistent with both
agencies guidelines. CDF and City of San Jacinto Fire
Department will be expected to conduct a year round
aggressive fire prevention program using guidelines
within CDF Handbook 9000 and City of San Jacinto Fire
Department Fire Prevention Guidelines. This will
include, but is not limited to, annual analysis and
planning sessions so a proactive fire prevention plan
can be generated and followed.
1. A Public Information Program - This will include
all types of fire prevention news releases through
the available media. Other methods may include
public meetings, fairs, rodeos, parades, service
clubs, etc., and a regular schedule of school
programs for all grades.
2. Protection/Planning Issues - Although the respon-
sibility for enforcing fire safe ordinances per-
taining to improvements in wildland areas within
the City Limits is the responsibility of the City
of San Jacinto Fire Department, a CDF representa-
tive will be available upon request to comment on
these issues and assist in the enforcement of
related ordinances.
0015
Hazard Reduction Inspections
Home Inspection - CDF will work directly with the
City of San Jacinto Fire Department to enforce
Public Resources Code Sections 4291, 4446, 4442,
4443, 4123, or applicable Uniform Fire Code Sec-
tions if applicable.
Powerline Inspections - CDF will work directly
with the City of San Jacinto Fire Department
concerning the inspections of powerlines over 750
volts, using PRC 4292 and 4293 as a guide.
B. RESPONSIBILITY
CDF and City of San Jacinto Fire Department personnel
will, in the performance of thier duties, give full
consideration to the prevention of fires and public
education. Both agencies will allow staff to establish
and attain fire prevention goals.
C. EXISTING AND PROJECTED DEMAND
Fire prevention, along with suppression and general
emregency mitigation, is a primary role for both agen-
cies. The demand for future services will increase
thus requiring more intensive programs. Fire protec-
tion and prevention will be influenced by the following
factors.
1. Increased recreation use
2. Increased residential and commercial development
3. Increased utilization of vacation residences
4. Industrial activity
D. OBJECTIVES
The objective of the fire prevention plan is the cost
effective reduction of fire suppression expenditures
and damages from person caused fires. It is also a
current and comprehensive public education program
directed towards fire safety awareness and code en-
forcement.
0016
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
1. Public Education
Both agencies will actively pursue public aware-
ness programs through the following medium:
a. School programs, ages K-3
b. Roadside sign program
c. Timely newspaper articles concerning fire
awareness
d. Attendance at various local promotions that
lend themselves well to fire prevention
displays.
2. Code Enforcement
a. Active PRC 4291 home inspection program in
targeted areas.
b. Enforcement of the Fire Safe Ordinances (PRC
4290) as they apply to construction in water-
shed areas. CDF will take an advisory role
with The City of San Jacinto Fire Marshal
within the agreement area.
FUEL MODIFICATION
Both agencies will continue to encourage property
owners and associations that own property to establish
and maintain a healthy fuel complex through the follow-
ing avenues:
1. Explore prescribed burning through available
programs
2. Manual fuel modification with mechanized programs
(bio-mass), handcrew programs, and local resources
3. Group bio-mass programs to control stems per acre
and remove dead and down materials.
5
0017
G. BURNING PERMIT ADMINSTRATION
Burning permits will continue to be required in the
City of San Jacinto consistent with guidelines estab-
lished in adjacent areas. This will provide consisten-
cy in the burn hours and any controls needed for the
overall program.
1. Burning Permit Issuance
The City of San Jacinto Fire Department has the
responsibility of issuing burn permits within the
City limits and therefore the AGREEMENT area.
Both agencies will agree to and establish burn
permit guidelines by April 1 of each year. Guide-
lines should mirror those established by the CDF
to ensure consistency in burn programs in both the
City and areas adjacent to the City.
2. Suspension of Permit Procedures
The suspension of burning permits in the AGREEMENT
area will be directly related to the burning
permit suspension prodecures outside of the AGREE-
MENT area to ensure consistency. Suspension will
be based on input from the CDF and the City of San
Jacinto Fire Department.
H. MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Periodic monitoring and evaluation of the Operating
Plan will provide for orderly and timely amendments and
revisions of the Plan. The monitoring will determine
if:
1. Objectives are being met
2. Plan direction is being followed
3. Plan is achieving desired results
6
0018
This Operating Plan has been approved and authorized as Exhibit
"B" to be attached to the Wildland Fire Protection For Local
Responsibility Areas Agreement between the Riverside Ranger Unit
and the City of San Jacinto.
FOR STATE: FOR LOCAL AGENCY:
California Department of
Forestry & Fire Protection
Riverside Ranger Unit
210 West San Jacinto Avenue
Perris, CA 92570
Ranger Unit Chief
7
City of San Jacinto
Fire Department
312 East Main Street
San Jacinto, CA 92583
Fire Chief
0019
CDF DISPATCH PLAN
PRE -PLANNED RESPONSE
LOCAL RESPONSIBILITY AREA
WILDLAND FIRE PROTECTION AGREEMENT
ANNEXATION 66 - JUNIPER HILLS AREA, SAN JACINTO
DOZER ENGINES OFFICER CREWS COPTER AIR AIR
ATTACK TANKER
LOW
2 1
MEDIUM
1
3 1 1 1 0 0
HIGH
2
5 1 2 1 1 2
San Jacinto Fire Department resources not included in wildland
response resources.
Station Proximity Air Attack
1. Station 25 1. Ryan Air Attack Base
2. Station 27 2. Ramona Air Attack Base
3. Station 26
4. Station 3
5. Station 72
6. Station 54
7. Station 66
Bulldozers Handcrews Copters
1. Station 25 1. Bautista C.C. 1. Hemet -Ryan Helitack
2. Station 20 2. Oak Glen C.C. 2. Keenwild Helitack
3. Station 1 3. Norco C.C. 3. Prado Helitack
0020
SAN JACINTO FIRE DEPARTMENT DISPATCH PLAN
PRE -PLANNED RESPONSE
LOCAL RESPONSIBILITY AREA
WILDLAND FIRE PROTECTION AGREEMENT
ANNEXATION 66 - JUNIPER HILLS AREA, SAN JACINTO
ENGINES OFFICER
LOW
MEDIUM
1
1
HIGH
1
*CDF resources not included in wildland
response resources.
Station proximity
1. Station 1 San Jacinto Fire Department
0021
BUDGET PLAN - 4142
INDEX - 3100 PCA - 02350
THIS IS THE BUDGET PLAN - 4142 OF THE COOPERATIVE LOCAL RESPONSIBILITY
AREA WiLOLAND FIRE PROTECTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION AND
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, A LOCAL AGENCY
Number of Acres 2105
IAgreesent Rate $ per acre (2511
IGenerel Fund Revenue (259)
1 Ranger Unit Budget Per Acre (2591
$1.70
.33
1.37
IfFiquree are 2Si for 4th Quarter FY 94/951
Adsinistratlw Charge
GENERAL FUND REVENUE 2125Aoree y23Revanue per Acre $694.65
RANGER UNIT BUDGET 21OSAcree 1•]7R. u. Budget par Acre $2,683.55
OPERATINq EXPENSE*
Facilities Operations
ADMINISTRATIVE CSARGES
$2,683.65
SUBTOTAL FACILITIES OPS
SUBTOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE
S2,883.85
$2,883.as
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE $2,863.85
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE AND GENERAL FUND REVENUE $3,575.50
0.1113 $397.21
GRAND TOTAL LRA WILDLAN) AGREEMENT 53,275.71
BUDGET PLAN - 4142
INDEX - 3100 PCA - 02350
THIS IS TEE BUDGET PLAN - 4142 OF THE COOPERATIVE LOCAL RESPONSIBILITY
AREA WILDLAND FIRE PROTECTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION AND
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, A LOCAL AGENCY
Number of Auras 2105
0022
!Agreea•nt Rate $ per acre $6.79
General Fund Rsvnue 1.31
(Ranger Unit Budget Per Acre 5.48
ITV 95/6 Budget Plan
Administrative Charge
GENERAL FUND REVENUE 21o5Acres 1.31ReVenUe per Acre 12,757.55
RANGER UNIT BUDGET 2105Acrsa S.gBR. U. Budget per Acre $11,535.40
Personal ,5•rvice` (Tam B610/
NO. Claes Months Rats Total Salary Benefits Total
Fire Fighter/ 1 FFI 3 •12,311 16,933 ••2,957.61 19,890.61
Eelltsck SUBTOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 59,890.61
Operating Expense%
Personal care
Uniform Allowance
1 FFI 3 $43.00/month
Facilities Operations 11,515.79
SUBTOTAL FACILITIES OPE
SUBTOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES AND OPERATING EXPENSE
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES, OPERATING EXPENSE AND GENERAL FUND REVENUE
ADMINISTRATIVE CHARGES
51,515.79
1,644.79
S11,535.40
$14,292.95
0.1113 $1.590.81
GRAND TOTAL LRA NILDLAND AGREEMENT $15,883.86
PERSONA! SERVICE DETAj&
*Base Salary - $2007/month
Planned overtime - 304/month
$2311/month
**Benefits - $946.90/month
Retirement (0T) - 38.97/month
$985.87/month
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: April 18, 1995
SUBJECT: Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 3-
94
APPLICANT: B & D Enterprises
The San Jacinto Marketplace
1477 N. State Street
San Jacinto, CA 92583
(909) 487-2370
LOCATION: The 3.8 acre north parking lot of Mount San Jacinto College. Parking is
proposed for the adjacent area to the north of the swap meet site.
DESCRIPTION
An appeal of the Planning Commission denial of a proposal to operate a 250 space swap
meet on Saturdays and Sundays on the 3.8 acre north parking lot of Mount San Jacinto
College.
RECOMMENDATION
After conducting the public hearing, either affirm or overturn the Planning Commission
decision. Should the City Council overturn the Planning Commission decision, the
Council shall:
1. Adopt a Negative Declaration pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
and Resolution No. 1348, as amended.
2. Grant CUP 3-94, subject to Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval attached
hereto and made a part herein.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The environmental review has been completed and is attached to this report. Comments
on the Environmental Study have also been addressed. Issues discussed include traffic
and circulation, security and fire protection, noise and air quality.
00
City Council Staff Report
CUP 3-94, Appeal
Page No. 2
BACKGROUND
On March 15, 1995, the Planning Commission denied the request to operate a 250 stall
swap meet on the campus of Mount San Jacinto College (MSJC). The Commission held
two meetings to complete the public hearing on the CUP application. The Commission
based its decision on the following findings:
1. Potential for significant impact on public safety services, due to lack of adequate
private security services.
2. Potential impact on surrounding residential neighborhoods from blowing trash and
dust, and from traffic and vendor equipment noise.
3. Potential impact on surrounding residential neighborhoods from traffic utilizing
residential streets for access.
4. Inadequate show of support from the MSJC administration (MSJC submitted
support letter on April 11, 1995.
DISCUSSION
After hearing considerable testimony on February 15, 1995, the Commission directed the
applicant to modify the site plan and make several modifications to the operations plan.
The applicant agreed to the changes, and on March 15, 1995, presented a modified plan
which moved the patron parking to an area north of the marketplace. The patron parking
lot was proposed to be graded, compacted and chemically treated to control dust. The
applicant also modified the operation plan to provide 6 uniformed security officers (at least
one of whom would be a San Jacinto officer paid by the marketplace), an on -duty
Emergency Medical Technician, and also committed personnel to continually patrol the
grounds of the college to pick-up trash and debris.
Other issues presented to the Commission include the legality of the use in the R-2 zone,
adequacy of the environmental review, the parking/traffic/circulation patterns of patrons
and vendors, and noise from early morning traffic and generators used by vendors. The
following is a discussion of these issues:
Legality of Use
The zoning of the site is R-2 (Two Family Res.). The R-2 zone permits schools with an
approved CUP. Outdoor markets are not listed as a conditionally permitted use. Section
17.02 of Ordinance 340, does provide for the establishment of interim uses upon the
approval of a CUP. The intent of this Section is to allow uses which are deemed to be
appropriate, even if such uses are not indicated in the applicable zone provided the uses
can be found to be consistent with the General Plan. The uses may be permitted for up
to five years, and are subject to the same review/recision provisions as a standard CUP.
00 J
City Council Staff Report
CUP 3-94, Appeal
Page No. 3
The subject site is located within the Public Institution General Plan designation. The
Public Institution designation is used to categorize existing publicly -owned property and
facilities. It includes City facilities as well as those of various public utilities and related
agencies. To approve this CUP, even though it is an interim CUP, the project has to be
consistent with the General Plan. The proposed outdoor market is consistent with and
implements the following goals and objectives of the General Plan:
A. The General Plan calls for a special review procedure for non-traditional
projects that implement the policy direction of the City Council.
1. The interim CUP process provides the special review process
indicated above. The policy of the City as stated in Ordinance 340 is
that the Planning Commission may approve uses that are of a
temporary nature for up to five years. These uses do not have to
conform to the underlying zoning requirements.
B. When not incompatible with the existing or anticipated residential
development, the General Plan states that interim uses may be permitted.
Interim uses proposed for longer than 12 months should be subject to the
review of the Planning Commission.
1. CUP 3-94 may be valid for up to five years.
2. Conditions of Approval have been recommended to mitigate any
activity that may have a detrimental impact on surrounding residential
uses. Also, all sales and parking activities will be confined to the
north side of the campus, over 600 feet away from the residential
use.
C. There is also a General Plan policy that states "Mixed -use development
which can demonstrate superior use of land, more efficient utilization of
public facilities, and more effective conservation of natural resources shall
be strongly encouraged by the City of San Jacinto."
1. The use of the College parking lot for a commercial outdoor market,
implements the above statement, by providing additional use of a
public facility during a period of time when that public facility
experiences minimal use.
City Council Staff Report
CUP 3-94, Appeal
Page No. 4
Environmental Review
The legal counsel for Maclin Markets not only challenged the legality of the use (as
discussed above), but also the adequacy of the environmental review. In response, the
City Attorney recommended changes to the initial study (attached). Pursuant to the
comments of the City Attorney, Staff modified the initial study by changing the format of
the document, expanding the analysis of the air quality impacts, noise impacts, and traffic
and circulation impacts. However, it seems Maclin's attorney continues to maintain the
same argument in opposition to the outdoor market.
Parkina/Traffic/Circulation
The original site plan proposed the utilization of the south parking lot located on Eagle
Road, adjacent to a residential area. Prior to the March 15, 1995 Planning Commission
meeting the applicant submitted a revised site plan that places all swap meet parking
north of the proposed vendor area located in the 3.8 acre north parking lot adjacent to
the north driveway. This would minimize the use of Community College Drive and Eagle
Drive and help keep swap meet patrons away from the residential area south of the
college.
There is always the potential that the south parking lot may inevitably be used by
marketplace customers. However, availability of this lot may be limited as it is used on
weekends throughout the year for sporting event patrons. Additionally, there are
occasional weekend classes. Furthermore, the parking lot itself is more than 500 feet
from the marketplace, less convenient than the proposed interim parking lot directly
across for the marketplace. There is further potential for the use of Eagle Drive and
Community College Drive, as vehicles may be routed in that direction if traffic collision or
something similar were to force the closure of the northerly access road. In the event the
Council elects to approve this permit, the submittal of an emergency routing plan shall be
required.
An interim parking area is considered acceptable at this point, as the success of the
market place is undetermined and it would not be cost effective to provide a fully
improved parking lot prior to opening the facility. Fully improved parking lots are
generally permanent features, and therefore the cost to fully improve a parking lot would
be amortized over an extended period, generally the projected lifespan of the use.
However, Staff is recommending that the gravel parking area be improved in phases,
beginning 18 months after the opening the facility and completed by the full term of the
permit (5 years). The parking lot is identified on the MSJC master plan, and if the outdoor
market is successful and permanent status is sought, the fully improved parking lot would
signify committment by the operators and be additional justification for permanent
approval.
U.
City Council Staff Report
CUP 3-94, Appeal
Page No. 5
Staff is recommending that the interim parking lot be large enough to accommodate 462
parking stalls, based upon a ratio of 1.85 stalls per vendor space. The ratio and the
overall parking count are equal to the peak parking needs of the use based upon peak
patron usage at a given time. The interim parking lot would be graded and compacted
gravel. To control dust, the parking lot would be chemically treated, and if necessary
regularly watered.
The proposed marketplace has the potential to generate approximately 1,290 vehicles per
day (i.e. 645 inbound and 645 outbound vehicles), based upon a patron capacity of
approximately 2,000 persons and an average ridership of 3.1 persons per vehicle. The
average ridership per vehicle is based on surveys of other open air marketplaces
conducted by the planning consulting firm of LSA and Associates. According to the LSA
report, the inbound and the outbound peak hour traffic (based upon similar events) would
be approximately 100 cars. The inbound peak hour would occur roughly between
10:00am and Noon. The outbound peak would occur roughly between Noon and
2:00pm.
MSJC currently has 5,450 students enrolled in college credit courses for the spring
semester with this number still growing. Additionally there are 3,000 more students
enrolled in non -college credit courses. With a combination of students and staff on
campus the traffic situation is more intense on weekdays while school is in session than
can be expected on weekends during the swap meet.
The 1993 TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON THE CALIFORNIA STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM reports
that the peak hour traffic count for this segment of State Street is 1400, and an average
daily traffic of 10,400. Peak hour traffic is typically determined on weekdays, during work
time commutes. Additionally, State Street currently has a relatively low volume to capacity
ratio (.27), which is based upon the amount of traffic on a given roadway in relation to
what that roadway can handle.
Based upon the fact that the traffic activity on a weekday is more intense than what would
be expected from the marketplace on the weekend, and also that State Street at its
weekday peak is currently functioning smoothly, the additional weekend trips generated
by the marketplace should easily be absorbed on State Street. Additionally, to ensure
smooth traffic flow and alleviate any potential traffic hazards, the proponents are
proposing to utilize traffic monitors.
00 F
City Council Staff Report
CUP 3-94, Appeal
Page No. 6
Noise
Noise is defined as unwanted sound. Its effects can range from annoya 3 and
interference to hearing loss and stress -related problems. The General Plan prr ,des the
standard for acceptable noise levels for residential developments at 65 d ;ibels for
outdoor living areas and 45 decibels for indoor areas.
A loud speaker system will be used for emergency announcements only (See Condition
#18). Vendors selling items that produce noise shall be limited to creating no noise that
can be heard outside of that sellers space (See Condition #19). These noises can be
expected, but are considered to be similar to typical noises associated with residential
areas (small combustion engines, stereos, etc.), and are not considered severe.
The applicant has indicated that certain vendors may want to use generators. Generator
manufacturer specifications were submitted by the applicant stating that heavy duty
generators produce no more than 78 decibels at 7 meters, while portable generators
produce no more than 70 decibels. Additionally, Environmental Consultants, Giroux &
Associates, states in an April 7, 1992 report that noise levels are reduced by
approximately 8 decibels on flat surface distances of 400 feet and that a barrier 9 feet in
height will further result in a noise reduction of 10.1 decibels.
The closest residences to the proposed swap meet are located 600 feet to the south.
Furthermore, there are existing campus structures standing between the proposed
marketplace and the residences. Based upon the combination of distance and the
current building placement which would act as barriers, noise levels will be reduced to
less than 65 decibels at the MSJC property lines. Also to further reduce noise levels from
generators, only those generators that create 78 or fewer decibels shall be permitted and
they shall be strategically placed to utilize the campus buildings as barriers (See Condition
#20).
City Council Staff Report
CUP 3-94, Appeal
Page No. 7
FINDINGS OF FACT CUP 3-94
City staff had recommended approval of CUP 3-94 based on the following findings of fact:
1. The subject property is neither in a seismic study area nor an "A" flood zone.
2. The property is within a Public\Institutional General Plan Area.
3. Use of the site will consist of a 250 space swap meet.
4. The adjacent surrounding uses consists of residential and vacant uses, a portion
of which is college owned property.
5. The zoning of the property is R-2 which does not allow a swap meet. However,
Section 17.12 of the zoning ordinance allows the Temporary Conditional Use
Permits for uses that are deemed appropriate.
6. The property is located within a public college and the Planning Director has
determined that a swap meet requires the approval of an Interim Conditional Use
Permit.
7. The conditional use granted for the applicant shall remain in force for the amount
of time prescribed by the City Council, but no more than five years, unless
extended by the Planning Commission or City Council, in accordance with Article
17.12.
8. The project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or
materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, per the Conditions
or Approval attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
9. The proposed outdoor market is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives
of the General Plan for the following reasons:
A. The General Plan calls for a special review procedure for non-traditional
projects that implement the policy direction of the City Council.
1. The interim CUP process provides the special review process
indicated above. The policy of the City as stated in Ordinance 340 is
that the Planning Commission may approve uses that are of a
temporary nature for up to five years. These uses do not have to
conform to the underlying zoning requirements.
0 8
City Council Staff Report
CUP 3-94, Appeal
Page No. 8
B. When not incompatible with the existing or anticipated residential
development, interim uses may be permitted. Interim uses proposed for
longer than 12 months should be subject to the review of the Planning
Commission.
1. CUP 3-94 is valid for five years only.
2. Conditions of Approval have been recommended to mitigate any
activity that may have a detrimental impact on surrounding residential
uses. Also, all sales and parking activities will be confined to the
north side of the campus, over 600 feet away from the residential
use.
C. Mixed -use development which can demonstrate superior use of land, more
efficient utilization of public facilities, and more effective conservation of
natural resources shall be strongly encouraged by the City of San Jacinto.
1. The use of the College parking lot for a commercial outdoor market,
implements the above statement, by providing additional use of a
public facility during a period of time when said public facility is not
in use.
Cie 9
City Council Staff Report
CUP 3-94, Appeal
Page No. 9
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL C.U.P. 3-94
1. The use hereby permitted is for a 250 space outdoor market located in the north
parking lot at Mount San Jacinto College. The effective date of issuance of this
permit is the date it is approved by the City Council. The applicants must activate
the permit within six months after Council approval or it will be deemed null and
void. The permit is valid for a five year period.
2. Prior to the commencement of use, the permittee must demonstrate to the
Community Development Department compliance with all conditions of approval.
3. Outdoor market hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M.
Saturdays and Sundays.
4. On -site security shall be provided and maintained at a level of service to the
satisfaction of the San Jacinto Police Department. San Jacinto Marketplace
Operations Plan indicates an initial staffing of six positions.
5. No signs are approved pursuant to this Conditional Use Permit. Prior to the
installation of any on -site advertising or directional signs, a signing plan shall be
submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department, pursuant
to the requirements of Article 16 of Ordinance 340.
6. In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of six months
or more, this approval shall become null and void.
7. This Conditional Use Permit is subject to Section 17.11 of Ordinance No. 340
(permit suspension and revocation).
8. No alcoholic beverages shall be sold or consumed at this facility.
9. The outdoor market shall dedicate staff to ensure that the premises are
continuously maintained in a safe, clean, and orderly condition with trash
receptacles provided.
10. The San Jacinto Planning Department will review the operation of the proposed
CUP to ensure compliance with all conditions after six months of operation and
again after twelve months. The cost of this review may be found in the Planning
Department current fee schedule under the heading " Environmental Monitoring
and Condition Enforcement." The current fee is $50.00.
0010
City Council Staff Report
CUP 3-94, Appeal
Page No. 10
11. Adequate restroom facilities shall be open and available during the outdoor market
operation. Adequate signage shall be available to direct patrons to restrooms.
12. No vendors signs shall be visible from public streets.
13. All electrical hook-ups must comply with all relevant provisions of the National
Electric Code as adopted by the City and any necessary building permits must be
procured from the building department.
14. All vendors shall collect California Sales Tax as required by the State Board of
Equalization and the address given must be a San Jacinto address.
15. All vendors shall hold current City Business License and display same in a
prominent location.
16. All food vendors must be certified by Riverside County Department of Health.
Evidence of this certification shall be displayed prominently.
17. All parking shall be off-street and provided for to the north of the vendor area at
a ratio of 1.85 stalls per vender space. The interim gravel parking area shall
incorporate appropriate grading, compaction and dust control measures subject
to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. The gravel parking
lot shall be chemically treated with an environmentally safe product manufactured
specifically for dust control; and if necessary shall be watered regularly before,
during and after each market event. This gravel area shall be for the exclusive use
of the outdoor market and be inaccessible to any traffic at any other time and shall
be limited to 18 months, at which time permanent improvements shall be
commenced to be completed in phases prior to the expiration of the permit. The
improvements shall be installed subject to the satisfaction of the Director of Public
Works.
18. No loudspeaker system shall be utilized, except as needed for emergency
announcements.
19. No music, sounds or noises which can be heard outside of the individual sellers
space is permitted.
20. Generators shall be properly maintained so as not exceed 78 decibels at 7 meters
(manufacturers specifications and/or satisfactory acoustical tests shall be
maintained on -site at all times), and shall be strategically placed to utilize buildings
as sound barrier for uses to the south.
City Council Staff Report
CUP 3-94, Appeal
Page No. 11
21. The permittee shall have an Emergency Medical Technician on duty during the
hours of operation of the outdoor market, subject to the satisfaction of the Fire
Department.
22. The outdoor market shall provide traffic monitors subject to the satisfaction of the
Police Department.
23. An emergency operations, evacuation and routing plan shall be submitted to the
Department of Community Development.
ATTACHMENTS
Site Plan
Environmental Assessment
Planning Commission Staff Reports and Memorandum, dated 2/15/95 and 3/15/95
Planning Commission Minutes, dated 2/15/95
Planning Commission Draft Minutes, dated 3/15/95
Two letters from B&D Enterprises, dated 3/8/95 and 3/19/95
Letter from MSJC, dated 4/11/95
Letter (dated 1/9/95) and a petition from area homeowners in opposition to proposal
Two letters from Sunrise Unit I, dated 12/23/94 and 3/15/95
Letter from Best Best and Krieger, dated 3/31/95
FIRE DEPARTMENT
INCORPORATE HEREIN THE FIRE DEPARTMENTS CHECKLIST DATED DECEMBER 22,
1994.
r
2
City of San Jacinto
Fire and Life Safety Department
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU CHECKLIST
APPLICANT: B -eD E/UTERPRISES
MEETING DATE: DECEJM ER 22 19971
SITE PLAN# 7 fY
1. PERMITS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE 1991 UNIFORM FIRE CODE
FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD SHALL BE PROVIDED & MAINTAINED IN ALL
PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. SEC.10.203
WIDTH Shall Not Be Less Than 20 Feet.
VERTICAL CLEARANCE Unobstructed Vertical Clearance Of Not Less
Than 13 Feet, 6 Inch
SURFACE OF ACCESS ROAD Shall Be Designed And Maintained to
Support The Imposed Loads Of Fire Apparatus And Shall Be Provided with
A Surface So As To Provide All -Weather Driving Capabilities.
ROAD IN EXCESS OF 150 FEET IN LENGTH SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH
APPROVED PROVISIONS FOR THE TURNING AROUND OF FIRE APPARATUS.
0 PROVIDE PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER AS DESIGNATED BY THIS FIRE
DEPARTMENT AND NFPA.SEC. 111.505.
5. PROVIDE AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM PER CITY REQUIREMENTS PER
CITY ORDINANCE #975.
6. AUTOMATIC SPINKLER SYSTEM NFPA 13 WITH FIRE CONNECTION.
SHALL HAVE A FIRE HYDRANT WITH IN 50'.
7. FULL FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALL & ACCEPTED BEFORE THE
COMMENCEMENT OF FRAMING.
8. PROVIDE FIRE DEPARTMENT WITH A SCALE MAP OF PROJECT.
(81/2X11)
10. KEY BOX (KNOX-BOX) RAPID ENTRY SYSTEM SHALL CONTAIN KEYS. MAP TO
SCALE, HAZARDOUS MATERIAL LIST.
pK /goc -�
FIRE FLOW SHALL BE GALLONS PER MINUTE AT 20 PSI
RESIDUAL OPERATING PRESSURE MUST BE AVAILABLE BEFORE ANY
COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL IS PLACED ON THE JOB SITE..
C 13
12. INSTALL A FIRE HYDRANT ( JAMES JONES J-3700 6" X 1-2 1/2 1-4" )
13. FIRE HYDRANT MUST BE WITHIN FEET OF ALL PARTS OF THE
BUILDING AS DESIGNATED BY THE FIRE DEPT. (COMMERCIAL &
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT )
14. FIRE HYDRANT SPACING IS EVERY FEET AS LOCATED BY THE
FIRE DEPT.
15. RELOCATE FIRE HYDRANT(S) TO
16. UPGRADE THE NEAREST HYDRANT TO
17. HYDRANTS TO BE PAINTED WITH Rust- Oleum Safety Yellow ( System Name
Industrial Enamel 5A263) BLUE DOT ON PAVEMENT TO INDICATE FIRE
HYDRANT.
18. A COMMERCIAL HOOD SHALL BE INSTALLED IN KITCHEN.
19. HOUR FIRE WALLS TO BE INSTALLED , DIVIDING THE BUILDING
INTO SECTIONS OF MORE THAN SQ. FEET.
20. [F A FULL MANSARD IS CONSTRUCTED, PROVIDE A LADDER TO THE ROOF
DECK.
2l TRASH BINS MUST HAVE A DROP LID.
22. STANDPIPES ON THE ROOF ARE REQUIRED.
23. INSTALL A WALK OR DRIVE -THOU WITH LOCK BOX.
24. A SECOND EMERGENCY EXIT SHALL BE PROVIDED.
25. POST "NOT A THROUGH STREET" SIGN AT ENTRANCES.
26. MITIGATION FOR FIRE PROTECTION IMPACT. S577.00 PER DWELLING UNIT,
APT. OR RESIDENCE. NEW INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL S0.34 PER SQUARE
FEET.
THE FIRE LANE SHALL BE SIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY AND STATE
REGULATIONS.
FIRE LANES SHALL BE DESIGNATED IN FOLLOWING LOCATIONS:
C014
28. ILLUMINATED DIRECTORY - ALL CONDOMINIUMS, APARTMENT COMPLEXES,
TOWN HOUSES AND MOBIL HOME PARKS SHALL INSTALL AND MAINTAIN
AT POINTS OF ENTRY ILLUMINATED DIRECTORIES.
c,
c.)
Athletic Fielc
•
'47)/
S/W
PAN
0016
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY A.FFhCTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project. involving
at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless
Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Land Use and Planning
Population and Housing
Earth Resources
Water
Air Quality
DETERMINATION.
v4
Transportation/Circulation Public Services
Biological Resources Utilities
Energy and Mineral Resources Aesthetics
Risk of Upset and Human Health Cultural Resources
Noise Recreation
Mandatory Findings of Significance
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. �' , =
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on
the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because
the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the
project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least,
1) one effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards; and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as
described on attached sheets, if the effect is a " potentially significant impact" or "potential
significant unless mitigated. " AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it
must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
Signature � %5 Ai Date . \�vw,
J
/pr i V
Printed a and itle JeF rzy 71 , CAA — T 1 e vie r I
C i /
For
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
(source #(s):
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over
the project?
c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g.
impact to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)?
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including a low-income or
minority community)?
POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or
indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped
area or extension of major infrastructure)?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable
housing?
3. EARTH AND GEOLOGY. Would the project result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Fault rupture?
b) Seismic ground shaking
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction?
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard?
e) Landslides or mudflows?
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading or fill?
g) Subsidence of the land?
h) Expansive soils?
i) Unique geologic or physical features?
vn17
Po¢mully
Pommully Simian Ws Than
5 landicam Unless 5igninom No
Impact Mutgamd Impact lmpacl
Y/
V
`/
V
V
n
Paewally `I/ • - 8
puemully Significant _ess Than
igmiican Unless Siemncm No
Impact MmPed act Impact
4. WATER. Would the project result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding?
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of
surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water
body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of
water movements?
fl Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability?
g) Altered direction or rate of glow of groundwater?
h) Impacts to groundwater quality?
AIR QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Violate any air quality standard to contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violations?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate?
d) Create objectional odors?
V
Paternally
Paternally Sandman Las Than
Satulicsm Unless Stymies= No
Impact Ming -abaci impact impact
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the project
result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g. farm equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby
uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on site or off site?
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative
transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project result in
impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds?
b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)?
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak
forest, (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
eem.wr 0 7 n
ro®uy Sipes= Les non
Sigmfiva Union Si mioos Nn
Impact Mmgsd 'a Impala
d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal
pool)?
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors?
.8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
project:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner?
9. RISK OF UPSET/HUMAN HEALTH.
Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited to:
oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health
hazards?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential
health hazards?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brash,
grass, or trees?
10. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels?
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
11. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered government
services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection?
r noi
Potannaliv
Potatually S:grutioust Los Than
Smulicao Unless Stannic:to No
Impact Mumatccl Impact Impact
b) Police protection?
c) Schools?
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads?
e) Other governmental services?
12. UTILMES.
Would the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial alternations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas?
b) Communications systems?
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks9
e) Storm water drainage?
f) Solid waste disposal?
13. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway?
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
c) Create light or glare?
44. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources?
b) Disturb archaeological resources?
c) Affect historical resources?
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e) Restrict existing religious of sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
Poo:®ally
?manually S.gwfaaa[ Loa Than
Slgmfgaaa Unlss Swann ,o No
Impact Miaaplad Impact Impact
15. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks of other recreational facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities?
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the Potential to degrade the
quality of the environmental, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-
term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals?
c) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects).
d) Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one
or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section
15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed by the earlier document.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "potentially significant" or "potentially significant
unless mitigated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the
earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project.
SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
FOR PROJECT NUMBER 94-19
CUP 3-94
SUMMARY
Project No. 94-19 involves an Interim Conditional Use Permit for the property at Mount
San Jacinto College. The specific location of the proposal is immediately east of State
Street and north of Country Village Drive. The Conditional Use Permit seeks to allow a
250 space swap meet on Saturdays and Sundays on the 3.8 acre north parking lot, of
Mount San Jacinto College. Parking for swap meet patrons is proposed for the 430-space
south parking lot, east of Eagle Road and south of Community College Drive.
The General Plan designation is Public institution and the Zoning is R-2. Section 17.12 of
the Zoning Ordinance does allow the Planning Commission to approve structures or uses
that are of a temporary nature, valid for a period of up to five years after the date of
approval, subject to extension, the amount of time to be determined by the Planning
Commission.
DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS
Potential site area impacts related to potential future development, as identified by the
Environmental Checklist are as follows:
(la) Land Use and Planning
Less Than Significant Impact
The site of Mount San Jacinto College is zoned R-2 and the General Plan designation is
Public Institution. The R-2 Zone does not allow a swap meet with a conditional use permit.
However, Section 17.12 of the Zoning Ordinance does allow the Planning Commission
to approve structures or uses that are of a temporary nature, valid for a period of up to
five years after the date of approval, subject to extension, the amount of time to be
determined by the Commission.
(1 b) Land Use and Planning
No Impact
The City of San Jacinto has jurisdiction over the proposed project. The primary
environmental plans and policies related to development on site are identified in San
Jacinto's General Plan and the Master Environmental Assessment for the City.
(1c) Land Use and Planning
No Impact
No agricultural lands are located on the site. No impact on agricultural resources or
operations will result from the proposed project. (Source; Site Survey)
r"4
(1d) Land Use and Planning
No Impact
The project site does not contain any residential use. The proposed use is less intense
than the uses present on the site Monday through Friday.
(2a) Population and Housing
No Impact
The proposed swap meet is expected to employ approximately 12 part time employees
and 3 full time employees.
(2b) Population and Housing
No Impact
The proposal is not anticipated to result in a substantial increase in the demand for new
housing in the area.
(2c) Population and Housing
No Impact
No existing residential units are located on the project site. No public funds will be
expended for this project that could otherwise be used to build public housing. All
financing of this project is coming from private (non-public) sources. The proposed San
Jacinto Marketplace would not result in the displacement or removal of any existing
housing units. (Sources:Site Survey; College Master Plan)
(3a) Earth and Geology
No Impact
None of the faults located in the City of San Jacinto have been placed on or near the
proposed site. No part of the site is within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. Thus,
no fault rupture hazard is present on site. (Source: State of California Special Studies
Zones, San Jacinto Quadrangle)
(3b) Earth and Geology
No Impact
The proposed project site will be subject to some groundshaking hazards from regional
and local earthquake events. The marketplace has no permanent structures, therefore
potential earthquake events are not likely to expose people to severe hazards.
(3c) Earth and Geology
No Impact
The proposed project site is
earthquake or other events.
potential earthquake events
(3d) Earth and Geology
No Impact
not anticipated to be subject to ground failure hazards from
The marketplace has no permanent structures, therefore
are not likely to expose people to severe hazards.
The City is located inland from the Pacific Ocean and would not be subjected to a
tsunami.
(3e) Earth and Geology
No Impact
The terrain within the project is level and no hazards associated with landslides will occur.
(Source: U.S.G.S. San Jacinto 7 1 /2 minute quadrangle, Site Survey)
(3f) Earth and Geology
No Impact
The Site is already developed. (Site Survey)
(3g) Earth and Geology
No Impact
The site is not located in an area which is considered to have subsidence hazards.
(Riverside County General Plan)
(3h) Earth and Geology
No Impact
The site of the proposed project is the Mount San Jacinto College parking lot, which is
an already improved surface. At the time of the construction of this parking lot all required
testing of the soils including compaction would have been done prior to the surfacing of
the parking lot. (Source: Site Review)
(3i) Earth and Geology
No Impact
No unique geologic and physical features are located on or near the project site and will
not be affected by the proposed project. (Sources: U.S.G.S. San Jacinto Quadrangle, Site
Plan)
(4a) Water
No Impact
The proposed site is already developed and all activities will take place on improved
surfaces. (Source: Site Plan; Site Review)
(4b) Water
No Impact
The site is within the X designated flood hazard area. The X zone includes those areas
that are outside the 500 year flood plain. The project site is also outside of the 100-year
flood plain. (Source: National Flood Insurance Program Flood Insurance Rate Map,
Community Panel Number 065056 0005 D)
(4c) Water
No Impact
There are no bodies of surface water on or adjacent to the project site.
(Source: Site Review)
(4d) Water
No Impact
The site is already developed. There will be no increase in water runoff volume.
(Site Plan; Site Review)
(4e) Water
No Impact
The City of San Jacinto does not have any substantial bodies of water or rivers. The San
Jacinto River is located north of the project site and will handle runoff water from the
project and surrounding areas.
(4f) Water
No Impact
The site is already developed and any additional water usage would be insignificant.
(4g) Water
No Impact
The San Jacinto Marketplace will have no groundwater wells on site and there will be no
excavation or construction will be involved. Thus, no alteration in the direction or rate of
flow of groundwater resources is expected. (Source: Site Plan)
(4h) Water
No Impact
The project site is already developed and ground absorption and runoff will remain
unchanged.
(5a) Air
Less Than Significant Impact
Currently the closest viable swap meet located in the area is in Perris. Several others are
located out of the area, in Palm Desert at College of the Desert, Colton, Ontario and
Orange County several miles away. A swap meet located in the San Jacinto Valley will
provide residents with this type of shopping experience with minimal driving time.
Many area residents currently leave the Valley for most similar shopping needs. A large
scale swap meet would help to reverse and shorten trips in the air basin. Thus, there
would be no additional auto related emissions generated.
The Marketplace will be using an area adjacent to the north parking lot for customer
parking. This parking lot will be a gravel parking lot on an interim basis to allow the
Marketplace to determine if it will be a viable venture or not. Paved parking will be phased
in a time frame determined by the Planning Commission. This gravel parking lot will be
graded and compacted and must adhere to stringent air quality dust control measures.
This dust control will include treatment of the soil with an environmentally safe product
manufactured specifically for dust control and if necessary to be watered every Friday,
Saturday and Sunday evenings or both if deemed necessary. This gravel parking area will
be for the exclusive use of the swap meet only on Saturdays and Sundays and will be
inaccessible to any traffic at any other time.
(5b) Air Quality
No Impact
The proposed use will be no more intense than that existing on campus the rest of the
week. Furthermore, there are no sensitive receptors adjacent to the site. (Mt. San Jacinto
College; LSA Associates Inc.)
(5c) Air Quality
No Impact
There are no proposed structures for this site. The vendors will be set up in the parking
lot. No changes in air movements, moisture or temperatures will be created. (Site Plan)
(5d) Air Quality
No Impact
The proposed project will not be involved in activities which may create objectionable
odors, such as waste hauling or the production of chemicals. The Marketplace uses may
create some odors from foods served in the cafeteria, however these odors are
anticipated to be mild and not unpleasant and not unlike the normal odors produced on
a daily basis while school is in session.
(6a,d,e) Transportation
Less Than Significant Impact
The use proposed has the potential to generate additional vehicular traffic. The proposed
swap meet is forecasting a patron capacity of approximately 2,000 persons. Based on
surveys of other open air marketplaces an average ridership of 3.1 persons per vehicle
is appropriate for this type of use. The total average daily trip generation of patron activity
is approximately 1,290 vehicles per day (i.e. 645 inbound and 645 outbound vehicles).
Mount San Jacinto College currently has 5,450 students enrolled in college credit courses
for the spring semester with this number still growing. Additionally there are 3,000 more
students enrolled in non college credit courses. With a combination of students and staff
on campus the traffic situation is more intense on weekdays while school is in session
than can be expected on weekends during the swap meet.
Adjacent roadway peaks are on weekdays so weekend activity, therefore, would not affect
commutes or create congestion during peak periods. The 1993 TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON
THE CALIFORNIA STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM reports that the peak hour traffic count
during the week is 1400. The swap meet will be adding approximately 1290 trips
dispersed throughout the day on weekends only.
Additionally, to alleviate any potential traffic problems and hazards on weekends, the
proponents are proposing to utilize traffic monitors to help control traffic.
(6b) Transportation/Circulation
No Impact
The proposed Marketplace will not include any new roadways or any modifications to
existing roadways. (Site Plan)
(6c) Transportation/Circulation
No Impact
The proposal will not obstruct emergency access to the site or surrounding uses.
(Source: Project Site Plan)
(6f) Transportation/Circulation
No Impact
The college has provided bike racks on site and public transportation also has adequate
access. (Source: Mount San Jacinto College Master Plan)
(7a) Biological Resources
No Impact
The Site is already developed as a Community College and no endangered, threatened
or their habitats are located on this site. (Source: Mount San Jacinto College Master Plan;
Project Site Plan; Site Review)
(7b) Biological Resources
No Impact
There are no locally designated biological resources on the project site. (Source:Site
Review)
(7c) Biological Resources
No Impact
The site is already developed, thus there are no existing biological resources of local
significance on the property. (source: Site Review)
(7d) Biological Resources
No Impact
There are no wetlands, marshes, riparian communities, or vernal pools on the proposed
project site. (Source: Site Review)
(7e) Biological Resources
r+030
No Impact
The Site is already developed and will be conducted in the parking lot of Mount San
Jacinto College. There are no known wildlife corridors within this project area. (Source:
Site Review; Project Site Plan)
(8a) Energy and Mineral Resources
No Impact
The proposed project is for an outdoor swap meet. Very little use of energy will be
required and will not conflict with any energy conservation plans.
(8b) Energy and Mineral Resources
No Impact
The proposed project is for an outdoor swap meet. Very little use of energy will be
required.
(9a) Risk of Upset/Human Health
No Impact
The proposed swap meet will not be involved in hazardous materials or wastes which
could explode or result in fire hazards. (Source: Applicants Environmental Information
Form from Application)
(9b) Risk of Upset/Human Health
No Impact
On site operations will not interfere with emergency responses to the site or surrounding
areas nor will it obstruct emergency evacuation of the area. (Source: Proposed Site Plan)
(9c) Risk of Upset/Human Health
No Impact
The proposed project shall comply with all health and safety regulations.
(9d) Risk of Upset/Human Health
No Impact
There are no existing health hazards on site. The proposed marketplace is not expected
to create any health hazard. The project will be required to conform to all applicable
health and safety codes. (Sources: Site Survey)
0031
(9e) Risk of Upset/Human Health
No Impact
There are no flammable brush, grass, or trees on site and the proposed marketplace will
comply with applicable fire safety codes. The proposed project will not create a fire
Hazard. (Source: Site Survey)
(10a) Noise
With the potential increased intensity of land use, additional noise may be created by the
new activity on weekends. The operations will be limited to daylight hours with a
maximum time frame of 7 A.M. to 4 P.M. on Saturdays and Sundays. No sound systems
or loud speaker systems will be allowed except for emergency announcements. Noise
levels will not be higher than noise currently produced on weekdays.
(10b) Noise
No Impact
Noise is defined as unwanted sound. Its effects can range from annoyance and
interference to hearing loss and stress -related problems. The General Plan provides the
standard for acceptable noise levels for residential developments at 65 decibels for
outdoor living areas and 45 decibels for indoor areas.
A loudspeaker system will be used for emergency announcements only. Vendors selling
items that produce noise shall be limited to creating no noise that can be heard outside
of that sellers space. These noises can be expected, but are considered to be similar to
typical noises associated with residential areas (small combustion engines, stereos, etc.),
and are not considered severe.
The applicant has submitted information to staff stating that heavy duty generators
produce no more than 78 decibels at 7 meters, while portable generators produce no
more than 70 decibels.
The closest residences to the proposed swap meet site is 600 feet to the south. For the
most part existing structures stand between the proposed swap meet site and these
residences. Additionally, Environmental Consultants, Giroux & Associates, states in an
April 7, 1992, report that noise levels are reduced by approximately 8 decibels on flat
surface distances of 400 feet and that a barrier 9 feet in height will result in a noise
reduction of 10.1 decibels.
Based upon the combination of distance and the current building placement which would
act as barriers, noise levels will be reduced to less than 65 decibels at the MSJC property
lines. Also, to further reduce noise levels from generators, only those generators that
create 75 or fewer decibels shall be permitted and they shall be strategically placed to
utilize buildings as barriers.
C032
11.(a,b,e) Public Services
No Impact
Fire protection services are provided by the San Jacinto Fire Department located at 180
W. Sixth Street in San Jacinto. Structural fires and fires from other man-made features are
the most significant fire threats to the City. Since there will be no structures used as part
of the swap meet the possible fire hazards will be mostly limited to the possibility of a
vehicle fire.
The applicant will have an Emergency Medical Technician on duty during the hours of
operation for the swap meet. This will greatly reduce the impact on public services in the
case of a medical emergency.
Police services are provided by the City of San Jacinto Police Department located at 160
W. Sixth Street in San Jacinto. Police Department comments indicate that the major
problem will be traffic related.
The applicant will provide six staff positions to help control traffic and provide security.
They have also obtained a permit from Cal Trans to provide safety cones and signage to
help direct incoming and outgoing traffic and to control parking.
(11 c) Public Service
No Impact
The swap meet will employ approximately 12 people on a part time basis. Most of these
employees will be students at the College. (Source: Applicant)
(11 d) Public Services
No Impact
The project site is currently served by existing infrastructure, including public roadways
such as State Street and the Ramona Expressway. The proposed project will not require
new or altered government services for the maintenance of roadways and other public
facilities. (Source: Site Survey; Proposed Site Plan)
(12a) Utilities
No Impact
The proposal is for an outdoor swap meet on an already improved site to be run during
daylight hours. The project will not require a significant level of electricity or natural gas
to result in the need for new systems or alterations to existing systems.
" 3 3
(12b) Utilities
No Impact
The project will not result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to
communication systems. The Site is already improved and the system is already existing.
(12c) Utilities
No Impact
The project will not result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to local or
regional water treatment or distribution facilities. The site is already improved and all
systems are in place.
(12d) Utilities
No Impact
The project will not result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to sewer
services or septic tanks. The site is already improved and all systems are already in place.
(12e) Utilities
No Impact
The project will not result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to storm
water drainage systems. The site is already improved and all systems are already in
place.
(12f) Utilities
No Impact
The project will not result in a need for new systems, or substantial alteration to solid
waste disposal systems. The site is already improved and all systems are already in
place.
(13a) Aesthetics
No Impact
The project site is located on the Mount San Jacinto College Campus. No new structures
will be constructed. Any type of booth that a vender may use must be totally
disassembled and removed from the site at the end of each business day. (Source: San
Jacinto Marketplace Rules and Regulations.
(13b) Aesthetics
No Impact
Project Site is a parking lot which has no aesthetic value.
�n34
(13c) Aesthetics
No Impacts
San Jacinto Marketplace will only do business during daylight hours, thus no light or glare
will be produced.
(14a) Cultural Resources
No Impacts
No paleontological resources will be disturbed. The project site is already fully improved.
(14b) Cultural Resources
No Impacts
No archeological resources will be disturbed. The project site is already fully improved.
(14c) Cultural Resources
No Impacts
No historical resources will be affected. The project site is already fully improved.
(14d) Cultural Resources
No Impacts
No unique ethnic cultural values will be affected. The project site is already fully improved.
(14e) Cultural Resources
No Impacts
The project will not restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact
area. The proposed site is part of the Public Educational System and is fully improved.
(15a) Recreation
No Impacts
The operation of the San Jacinto Marketplace will result in approximately 12 employees.
These employees are not expected to utilize parks in the area to a level that results in any
detectable adverse impact. (Source: Application Materials)
"3 5
(15b) Recreation
No Impacts
The proposed project will not replace nor provide a recreational opportunity in the City.
The operation of the facility will have no effect on the existing or future recreational
opportunities on San Jacinto. (Source: Application Materials; Proposed Site Plan)
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 15, 1995
TO: Chairman Duistermars and Members of the Planning Cr nission
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit 3-94; San Jacinto Marketplace
The City received the attached correspondence from Best, Best & Krieger, the legal firm
representing Maclin Markets, citing opposition to this proposal. The City Attorney has
reviewed the letter from Best, Best & Krieger and recommends that the following additional
findings be incorporated into the Staff Report to support this proposal.
FINDINGS OF FACT
9. The proposed outdoor market is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of
the General Plan for the following reasons:
A. The General Plan calls for a special review procedure for non-traditional
projects that implement the policy direction of the City Council.
1. The interim CUP process provides the special review process indicated
above. The policy of the City as stated in Ordinance 340 is that the
Planning Commission may approve uses that are of a temporary nature
for up to five years. These uses do not have to conform to the
underlying zoning requirements.
B. When not incompatible with the existing or anticipated residential
development, interim uses may be permitted. Interim uses proposed for longer
than 12 months should be subject to the review of the Planning Commission.
1. CUP 3-94 is valid for five years only.
2. That CUP 3-94 is not incompatible because all sales and parking
activity will be confined to the north side of the campus away from the
residential.
se3'7
C. Mixed -use development which can demonstrate superior use of land, more
efficient utilization of public facilities, and more effective conservation of
natural resources shall be strongly encouraged by the City of San Jacinto.
1. The use of the College parking lot for a commercial outdoor market,
implements the above statement, by providing additional use of a
public facility during a period of time when said public facility is not
in use.
With regard to the environmental review, the City Attorney requests additional time to
review CEQA related legislation that became effective in September of 1994. Upon
completion of the analysis by the City Attorney of the recently enacted CEQA legislation,
it will be determined if the Initial Study prepared is satisfactory or if additional
environmental analyses is needed.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that Planning Commission open the public hearing, accept testimony on
the proposal, and continue this item to the March 15, 1995, Planning Commission meeting.
0e 38
STAFF REPORT
TO: Chairman Duistermars and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Jeff Cherry, Planner I
DATE: February 15, 1995
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit 3-94
APPLICANT: B&D Enterprises
PO Box 1437
Hemet, CA
DESCRIPTION
A proposal to operate a 250 space swap meet on Saturdays and Sundays on the 3.8 acre
north parking the 430 ot, of spnt San ace southc'park parkingege. lot, eastofEagle Road andor swap meet patrons is
South of
proposed for P
Community College Drive.;
EXHIBIT "A"
EXHIBIT "B"
EXHIBIT "C"
EXHIBIT "0"
SITE PLAN
EXISTING ZONING
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN
EXISTING USES
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The environmental review has been completed and is attached to this report. Issues
discussed include traffic and circulation, security and fire protection and air quality.
"n39
DISCUSSION
The subject site is located within the Public Institution General Plan designation. The
Public Institution designation is used to categorize the existing publicly -owned property
and facilities. It includes City facilities as well as those of various public utilities and related
agencies. The swap meet is proposed for Mount San Jacinto College, which is a public
institution.
The zoning of the subject site is R-2 (Two Family Zone ). The R-2 Zone is intended to
provide a range of housing opportunities from single family small lot development to
duplex development. Private and public schools are permitted in the R-2 Zone with an
approved Conditional Use Permit. The subject use is a not listed as a conditionally
permitted use. However, section 17.12 states that the Planning Commission may approve
structures or uses that are of a temporary nature, valid for a period of up to five years
after the date of approval, subject to extension, the amount of time to be determined by
the Commission. The intent of this is to allow the Planning Commission to approve
temporary uses whether they are consistent with the applicable zone or not.
The surrounding land use is composed of residential and vacant uses. The swap meet
site itself is a parking lot of Mount San Jacinto College. The San Jacinto Marketplace is
located in the College Neighborhood.
Staff has received 2 letters and a petition with 84 signatures from area residents in
opposition to this proposal. Traffic on Community College Drive and Eagle Avenue is the
primary concern. The swap meet has the potential to generate from 650 to 1000 vehicle
trips entering and exiting the area. White Eagle Avenue does not have any homes fronting
on it, area residents do need to drive that way to get out of the neighborhood. Traffic and
circulation are addressed in the LSA reports and the Environmental Review.
The parking for the swap meet is 800 feet away from the available parking when
measured from the nearest point of the parking facility to the nearest point of the ouilding
or use served by said parking. The parking by Ordinance should not be more than 600
feet away from the use. The ideal place for parking for this facility would be north of the
north driveway where the College has plenty of vacant property. Until parking is provided
in closer proximity to the sales area, the sales area shall be reduced to accomodate
parking for patrons. Or additional paved parking shall be provided in the location indicated
above. Based upon the LSA report, a 2.0 AVR (Average Vehicle Ridership) would result
in a parking ratio of 1.85 stalls per vender.
Another issue is the potential noise problems could be distracting to the area residents.
To help avoid this generators and load speaker systems will not be allowed. One of the
swap meet rules is, "No music sounds or noises which can be heard outside the sellers
space is allowed."
PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 15, 1995 PAGE NO. 2
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 3-94 subject
to Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval and Grant a Negative Declaration with
mitigating measures.
ATTACHMENTS:
Environmental Assessment
B & D Enterprises General Operating Procedures for Sellers
San Jacinto Marketplace Operations Plan
LSA Associates, Inc. Response to Police Department Comments
LSA Associates, Inc. San Jacinto Marketplace: Parking Accumulation
Cal Trans Encroachment Permit
Letters of Opposition
PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 15, 1995 PAGE NO. 3
C.U.P. 3-94
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The subject property is neither in a seismic study area nor an "A" flood zone.
2. The property is within a Public\Institutional General Plan Area.
3. Use of the site will consist of a 250 space swap meet.
4. The adjacent surrounding uses consists of residential and vacant uses, a portion of
which is college owned property.
5. The zoning of the property is R-2 which does not allow a swap meet. However, section
17.12 of the zoning ordinance allows the Planning Commission to grant Temporary
Conditional Use Permits for uses that are deemed appropriate.
6. The property is located within a public college and the Planning Director has
determined that a swap meet requires the approval of an Interim Conditional Use
Permit.
7. The conditional use granted for the applicant shall remain with property for the amount
of time prescribed by the Planning Commission, but no more than five years, subject
to an approved extension regardless of proprietor.
8. The project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, per the mitigation measures as
addressed in the attached Environmental Review attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference.
PLANNING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 15, 1995 PAGE NO. 4
c0.42.,
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
C.U.P. 3-94
1. The use hereby permitted is for a swap meet located at Mount San Jacinto
College. The effective date of issuance of this permit is the date it is ratified by the
City Council. The applicants must activate the permit within six months after
ratification or it is null and void. The permit is for a five year period, or as provided
by the Planning Commission.
2. Prior to the commencement
use
the Planning a must DepartmentdemonstrateoheCity ofSan compliance with all conditions of approval to 9
Jacinto.
Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. Saturdays and
Sundays.
4. On site security shall be provided and maintained at a level of service to the
satisfaction of the San Jacinto Police Department. San Jacinto Marketplace
Operations Plan indicates an initial staffing of six positions.
5. No signs are approved pursuant to this Conditional Use Permit. Prior to the
installation of any on site advertising or directional signs, a signing plan shall be
submitted pursuant to the requirements of Article 16 of Ordinance 340.
In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of six months
or more, this approval shall become null and void.
7. This Conditional Use Permit is subject to Section 17.11 of Ordinance No. 340
(permit suspension and revocation).
8. No alcoholic beverages shall be sold or consumed at this facility.
9. The premises shall be continuously maintained in a safe, clean, and orderly
condition with trash receptacles provided.
10. The San Jacinto Planning Department will review the operation of the proposed
C.U.P. to ensure compliance with all conditions after six months of operation and
again after twelve months. The cost of this review may be found in the Planning
Department current fee schedule under the heading " Environmental Monitoring
and Condition Enforcement." The current fee is $50.00.
FEBRUARY 15, 1995 PAGE NO. 5
PLANNING COMMISSION
11. Adequate restroom facilities shall be open and available during swan meet
operation. Adequate signage shall be available to direct patrons to restrooms.
12. No vendors signs shall be visible from public streets.
13. All electrical hook-ups must comply with all relevant provisions of the National
Electric Code as adopted by the City and any necessary building permits must be
procured from the building department.
14. All vendors shall collect California Sales Tax as required by the State Board of
Equalization and the address given must be a San Jacinto address.
15. All vendors shall hold current City Business License and display same in
prominent location.
16. All food sale vendors must be certified by Riverside County Department of Health.
Evidence of this certification shall be displayed prominently.
17. Swap meet shall be limited to 250 spaces, pursuant to the provision of adequate
patron parking.
18. Loudspeaker system shall be allowed for emergency announcements only.
19. No music, sounds or noises which can be heard outside of the sellers space is
allowed.
20. Generators shall not be used.
21. All parking shall be off street. Parking shall be provided in the north parking lot or
constructed in closer proximity at a ratio of 1.85 stalls per vender space.
22. The permittee shall have an Emergency Medical Technician on duty during the
hours of operation for the swap meet, subject to the satisfaction of the Fire
Department.
23. The swap meet shall have a minimum of six staff members available to help direct
traffic and the operations plan must be adhered to.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
INCORPORATE HEREIN THE FIRE DEPARTMENTS CHECKLIST DATED DECEMBER 22,
1994.
PLANNING COMMISSION
Miletti*W01004 PAGE NO. 6
-44
AGENDAIV
STAFF REPORT
TO: Chairman Duistermars and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Jeff Cherry, Planner I
DATE: March 15, 1995
SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 3-94
APPLICANT: B&D Enterprises
PO Box 1437
Hemet, CA
DESCRIPTION
A proposal to operate a 250 space swap meet on Saturdays and Sundays on the 3.8 acre
north parking lot, of Mount San Jacinto College. Parking for swap meet patrons is
proposed for the area adjacent to the north of the swap meet site.
EXHIBIT "A-1" REVISED SITE PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The environmental review has been completed and is attached to this report. Comments
on the Environmental Study have also been addressed. Issues discussed include traffic
and circulation, security and fire protection, noise and air quality.
DISCUSSION
At the February 15, 1995 Planning Commission meeting, parking and noise were major
issues. These issues are addressed below:
PARKING
The applicant has submitted a revised site plan to staff that places all swap meet parking
north of the proposed vendor area located in the 3.8 acre north parking lot adjacent to
the north driveway. This would eliminate the use of Community College Drive and Eagle
Drive and keep swap meet patrons away from the residential area south of the college.
PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 15, 1995 PAGE NO. 1
v�4 J
During the five year life of the swap meet the parking lot will be a gravel parking surface.
Paved parking will be phased in a time frame determined by the Planning Commission.
This gravel parking lot will be graded and compacted and must adhere to stringent air
quality dust control measures. (See Condition #21) This dust control will include treatment
of the soil with an environmentally safe product manufactured specifically for dust control
and if necessary to be watered every Friday, Saturday and Sunday evenings. This gravel
parking area will be for the exclusive use of the swap meet only on Saturdays and
Sundays and will be inaccessible to any traffic at any other time.
NOISE
Noise is defined as unwanted sound. Its effects can range from annoyance and
interference to hearing loss and stress -related problems. The General Plan provides the
standard for acceptable noise levels for residential developments at 65 decibels for
outdoor living areas and 45 decibels for indoor areas.
A loud speaker system will be used for emergency announcements only. (See Condition
#18) Vendors selling items that produce noise shall be limited to creating no noise that
can be heard outside of that sellers space. (See Condition #19) These noises can be
expected, but are considered to be similar to typical noises associated with residential
areas (small combustion engines, stereos, etc.), and are not considered severe.
The applicant has submitted information to staff stating that heavy duty generators
produce no more than 78 decibels at 7 meters, while portable generators produce no
more than 70 decibels.
The closest residences to the proposed swap meet are located 600 feet to the south. For
the most part existing structures stand between the proposed swap meet site and these
residences. Additionally, Environmental Consultants, Giroux & Associates, states in an
April 7, 1992, report that noise levels are reduced by approximately 8 decibels on flat
surface distances of 400 feet and that a barrier 9 feet in height will result in a noise
reduction of 10.1 decibels.
Based upon the combination of distance and the current building placement which would
act as barriers, noise levels will be reduced to less than 65 decibels at the MSJC property
lines. Also to further reduce noise levels from generators, only those generators that
create 75 or fewer decibels shall be permitted and they shall be strategically placed to
utilize buildings as barriers. (See Condition #20)
Traffic noise will also be eliminated by moving the parking area thus eliminating traffic on
Community College Drive and Eagle Drive.
PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 15, 1995 PAGE NO. 2
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve
andCo nditional t a Negate ive Permit
3-94 subject
to Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval
ration.
C.U.P. 3-94
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The subject property is neither in a seismic study area nor an "A" flood zone.
2. The property is within a Public\Institutional General Plan Area.
3. Use of the site will consist of a 250 space swap meet.
4. The adjacent surrounding uses consists of residential and vacant uses, a portion of
which is college owned property.
5. The zoning of the property is R-2 which does not allow a swap meet. However, section
17.12 of the zoning ordinance allows the Planning Commission
to grant Temporary
Conditional Use Permits for uses that are deemed appropriate.
6. The property is located within a public college and the Planning Director has
determined that a swap meet requires the approval of an Interim Conditional Use
Permit.
7. The conditional use granted for the applicant shall remain with property for the amount
of time prescribed by the Planning Commission, but no more than five years, subject
to an approved extension regardless of proprietor.
3. The project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially
injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, per the mitigation measures as
addressed in the attached Environmental Review attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference.
PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 15, 1995 PAGE NO. 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
"n47
C.U.P. 3-94
1. The use hereby permitted is for a swap meet located at Mount San Jacinto
College. The effective date of issuance of this permit is the date it is ratified by the
City Council. The applicants must activate the permit within six months after
ratification or it is null and void. The permit is for a five year period.
2. Prior to the commencement of use the permittee must demonstrate compliance
with all conditions of approval to the Planning Department of the City of San
Jacinto.
3. Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. Saturdays and
Sundays.
4. On -site security shall be provided and maintained at a level of service to the
satisfaction of the San Jacinto Police Department. San Jacinto Marketplace
Operations Plan indicates an initial staffing of six positions.
5. No signs are approved pursuant to this Conditional Use Permit. Prior to the
installation of any on -site advertising or directional signs, a signing plan shall be
submitted pursuant to the requirements of Article 16 of Ordinance 340.
6. In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of six months
or more, this approval shall become null and void.
7. This Conditional Use Permit is subject to Section 17.11 of Ordinance No. 340
(permit suspension and revocation).
8. No alcoholic beverages shall be sold or consumed at this facility.
9. The premises shall be continuously maintained in a safe, clean, and orderly
condition with trash receptacles provided.
10. The San Jacinto Planning Department will review the operation of the proposed
C.U.P. to ensure compliance with all conditions after six months of operation and
again after twelve months. The cost of this review may be found in the Planning
Department current fee schedule under the heading " Environmental Monitoring
and Condition Enforcement." The current fee is $50.00.
11. Adequate restroom facilities shall be open and available during swap meet
PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 15, 1995 PAGE NO. 4
ell
operation. Adequate signage shall be available to direct patrons to restrooms.
12. No vendors signs shall be visible from public streets.
13. All electrical hook-ups must comply with all relevant provisions of the National
Electric Code as adopted by the City and any necessary building permits must be
procured from the building department.
14. All vendors shall collect California Sales Tax as required by the State Board of
Equalization and the address given must be a San Jacinto address.
15. All vendors shall hold current City Business License and display same in
prominent location.
16. All food sale vendors must be certified by Riverside County Department of Health.
Evidence of this certification shall be displayed prominently.
17. Swap meet shall be limited to 250 spaces, pursuant to the provision of adequate
patron parking.
18. Loudspeaker system shall be allowed for emergency announcements only.
19. No music, sounds or noises which can be heard outside of the sellers space is
allowed.
20. Generators shall be allowed only when they create 75 decibels or less at 7 meters
and only when strategically placed to utilize buildings as sound barriers to block
sound from residences to the south.
21. All parking shall be off-street. Parking shall be provided in the north parking lot or
constructed to the north of the vendor area at a ratio of 1.85 stalls per vender
space. The interim gravel parking area shall be graded and compacted and dust
control measures will include treatment of the soil with an environmentally safe
product manufactured specifically for dust control and if necessary to be watered
every Friday, Saturday and Sunday evenings. This gravel area shall be for the
exclusive use of the swap meet only on Saturdays and Sundays and will be
inaccessible to any traffic at any other time.
cian on
22 hourseof operation for ethe swapan rgency meet subject) toe the) satisfaction yduring
The of the Fire
Department.
23. The swap meet shall have a minimum of six staff members available to help direct
traffic and the operations plan must be adhered to.
PAGE NO. 5
PLANNING COMMISSION
FIRE DEPARTMENT
INCORPORATE HEREIN THE FIRE DEPARTMENTS CHECKLIST DATED DECEMBER 22,
1994.
ATTACHMENTS
Letter from B&D Enterprises
Environmental Assessment
Dust Control Product Information
PLANNING COMMISSION
lie*R A> tet PAGE NO. 6
r J
050
1.0 NEW PUBLIC HEARINGS
4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 3-94
Applicant: B & D Enterprises
A proposal for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a 250 space swap meet on Saturdays
and Sundays on the 3.8 acre north parking lot of Mt. San Jacinto College, located east
of State Street and north of Community College Drive. Parking for swap meet patrons
will be in the 430-space south parking lot, located east of Eagle Road and south of
Community College Drive.
Senior Planner Tim Hults, gave an update on several issues, suggested the public hearing
be opened for testimony, then continue the case to March 15th to determine adequacy
of the City's Environmental Review.
Planner Jeff Cherry presented background of the staff report, pointing out the available
parking for the swap meet to their sales area was 530 ft., (which he and Huits had
accurately measured in the field, this date). Staff would like to see parking in an unused
area, without using Eagle Road or Community College Drive. Another concern is the
potential noise problem. Staff has received two letters and a petition with 84 signatures
from area residents in opposition to this proposal. The public hearing was opened for
comments.
Felicitas Taylor (647 Villa Chaparral) was concerned about the volume of traffic on their
private streets, clean up of the swap meet area, and their yards as well.
Richard Hubenet (1319 Bushy Tail Trail) voiced objection to the overflow parking on their
streets as his home faces the south parking lot. He asked where students would park
on Saturdays and noted that a gravel surface would become a mudhole in rainy weather.
Ron Lawlor (1234 Sierra Seneca Dr.) emphasized the congestion of ingress/egress on
only two streets; Gold Street having "NO Parking" and students are currently being cited.
It would be a bottleneck, leaving no emergency vehicle access.
Walter Smilac (624 Villa Chaparral) as a Sunrise Village resident, felt a favorable rapport
with students attending the college, further that funds from this type of activity would not
improve the college. He inquired about bonding, insurance, and security.
Benning Cook (1338 Sierra Seneca) Sunrise Unit I Representative, voiced objections of
pedestrian and automobile traffic, noise level and felt the proposed use was incompatible
to the neighborhood.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
95-02-15 PAGE 2
"eel
Harriet Warkentin (619 Villa Chaparral) objected to eariy morning noise every Saturday
& Sunday of the year from flea market traffic; further that students pay a $15-$20 fee to
park and flea market patrons park free.
Doug Phillips, (Best Best & Krieger, 39-700 Bob Hope Drive) represented Maclin Markets
Inc.; stated traffic seemed to be a problem of major impact, however it would be a money
maker to generate money for the college; stated it violates CEQA requirements; doesn't
comply with the General Plan or Zoning Ordinance; referencing his letter to the City dated
February 13th, he requested denial.
Don Kaiser (344 N. State Street) approves of the swap meet and feels that it would draw
people to the area.
David Dudman (1247 Sorrel, Hemet) applicant, submitted a letter of introduction and
purpose of the proposal to each Commissioner. After Maclin moved, B&D Enterprises
felt a need for a market place in the Valley.
Bruce Landsberg (B&D Partner) also submitted a letter requesting elimination of Condition
No. 20."Generators shall not be used" The generators for intended use will create
minimal noise; further Condition No. 21 be eliminated, concerning distance in parking.
Acknowledged the area residents, stated he hoped to be good neighbors; Promised
provision for adequate cleanup; Project should provide funds to college, savings to the
community as some local businesses desire another outlet for their stores.
Smitty Charland (1335 Bushy Tail Trail) concurred with Staffs recommendation not to use
that parking lot and area.
Other opposing residents were:
Jim Taylor (647 Villa Chaparral)
Cathy Garofolo (643 Villa Chaparral)
Bonnie Smilac (624 Villa Chaparral)
R. Colby (1314 Bushy Tail Trail)
Ken Wofford (650 Villa Chaparral)
Testimony concluded with a question and answer period. Wally Hubbard (MSJC
representative) was present but did not request to speak formally. Public hearing
remained open.
ACTION
MOTION
SECOND
VOTE
PLANNING
Commissioner Duistermars entertained a motion to continue the public
hearing open to March 15, 1995 in order to explore the area north of the
college facility for a parking area.
Commissioner Richard Hixson
5-0; Motion carried.
COMMISSION MINUTES
95-02-15 PAGE 3
nnr7
k-1v3`-•••
3.0 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS
3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 3-94
Applicant: B & D Enterprises
Proposal for a Temporary Conditional Use Permit to operate a 250 space swap meet on
Saturdays and Sundays on the 3.8 acre north parking lot of Mt. San Jacinto College,
located east of State Street and north of Community College Drive for up to 5 years.
Parking for swap meet patrons
will
ll be prssovided
thine terim
es area.
Planner lot on the north side
of the northerly MSJC entry road
Planner Jeff Cherry adressed the major issues from the February Planning Commission
Meeting, which were parking and noise. A revised site plan has been submitted that
places all swap meet parking north of the proposed vendor area, eliminating the use of
Community College Drive and Eagle Road and keeping patrons away from the residential
area south of the college, will control parking and noise. Environmentally safe products
will be used to treat the gravel parking lot will be used to adhere to air quality dust control
measures. Noise has been addressed by Conditions No. 18 (Loudspeaker system shall
be allowed for emergency announcements only.); and No. 19 (No music, sounds or
noises which can be
heaandrd
outside
thehed sellers
o staff rs treport.
isallowed.). The environmental
review has beencompleted
The public hearing was opened for comments.
John M. Taylor (647 Villa Chaparral, Sunrise I) suggested the proposed swap meet be
moved to a location such as Valley Wide Recreation, rather than his residential
neighborhood.
Harriet Warkentin (619 Villa Chaparral, Sunrise I) objected to early morning traffic noise,
the conflict of student/swap meet patron use of the rest rooms, cafeteriaand parking.
Benning Cook (1338 Sierra Seneca) Sunrise Unit I Representative, spoke of concerns
regarding reduced property value to the neighborhood, increased traffic, dust and litter,
and people wandering through private property.
Felicitas Taylor (647 Villa Chaparral, Sunrise I) submitted a list summarizing concerns of
the neighborhood.
Ken Wofford (650 Villa Chaparral) had tax concerns supporting public institutions and
objected to supporting the swap meet. Questioned the use of a mobilehome being used
for office space by the applicant and if it was free rent.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
DRAFT
PAGE 2
DRAFT, 53
John Mortillard (1212 Sierra Seneca Dr.) President of Sunny Hills Homeowners
Association, spoke of traffic concerns.
Doug Phillips, (Best Best & Krieger, 39-700 Bob Hope Drive) represented Medlin Markets
Inc.; opposed the proposal, suggesting that the CUP must be consistent with the General
Plan and that in his opinion the swap meet was not. He also disagreed that a 5 year limit
should be considered a temporary use. Substantial neighborhood impacts such as dust,
noise, traffic and police enforcement are concerns. In his opinion the proposal violates
the general plan, zoning, and CEQA regulations, respectfully requested the Commission
deny the request.
Bruce Landsberg (B&D Partner) rebutted that Medlin Markets should have no interest in
this area since thay had not operated here in several years. He welcomed any resident
to his office to discuss the issues, and previously walked the neighborhood with invitation
flyers for a meeting; 2 people attended. His staff is dedicated to clean up of the area
used, but not designated as yet. Swap meet cafeteria use will be coordinated with the
college students. Landsberg is willing to pay for signage, working with staff for placement
and wording, suggestions by residents welcomed. Should there be excessive wind, swap
meet closes down. Rent is paid for use of the mobile home office.
Testimony concluded and the Commissioners discussed the issues of dust contol,
sufficient trash dumpsters, traffic concerns, security, and why the college representative
was not present at the meeting.
ACTION
MOTION Commissioner Hixson entertained a motion to deny the request for
Conditional Use Permit 3-94 based on the following findings:
FINDINGS OF FACT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 3-94
1. Potential for significant impact or public safety services, due to lack of adequate
private security services.
2. Potential impact on surrounding residential neighborhoods from blowing trash and
dust.
3. Potential impact on surrounding residential neighborhoods from traffic utilizing
residential streets for access.
SECOND Commissioner Meadows
VOTE 3-1-1; Motion carried. Hixson voted Aye, Meadows -Aye, Ayres -Aye,
Duistermars-Nay, Perry -abstain.
********
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES PAGE 3
�054
B & D Enterprises
The San Jacinto Marketplace
1477 N. Stets Street
San Jacinto. Ca. 82593
March 8,1995
Re: Project Number 94-19
Conditional Use Permit 3-94
Telephone (G02) 487-2370
Fax (809) 497-2372
B & D Enterprises will gravel an area adjacent to the north parking lot for customer
parking. The size of this area will accommodate about the same amount of parking as in
the South parking lot. This area will be ready for use the opening day of operations.
Based on previously submitted LSA reports the impact of traffic would be the same as the
daily usage of the college.
This area would remain as gravel for the initial term of the C.U.P . When the Planning
Dept. defines the provisions of renewal of the C.U.P., B & D will submit a phase in plan
for improvements of the area.
,,FAQ 407.CC
y Cr I: •:.• ; _.
-AN
un�5
I c . cf-36Z4
B & D Enterprises
The San Jacinto Marketplace
477 N. State Street
San Jacinto. Ca. 9'b83
March 19, 1995
Telephone 1933) 487-2370
Fax i ) 487-2372
Laurie Mora
Deputy City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
312 E Main Street
San Jacinto. Ca. 92583
Subject: Approval from Planning Commission Denial of Conditional Use Permit 3-94
B & D Enterprises is filing this appeal to the denial of a Conditional Use Permit by the
Planning Commission on March 15 1995.
The Conditional Use Permit is to operate a Marketplace (Swap Meet) on the Mt. San
Jacinto College campus north parking lot.
The following were sighted:
1 Lack of adequate security
Impact of blowing trash
3 Impact of potential traffic on residential streets
The Planning Department recommended approval of CUP 3-94.
The recommendation consisted of 23 conditions of approval. Conditions 4. 9. 10. 21. 23
address the above noted reasons for denial. B & D not only aggress above to cstatedly wth salso all of
the conditions. but has already made arrangements concerning
page 1
vnJ�
B & D Enterprises
The San Jacinto Marketplace
1477 N. State Street
San Jacinto. Ca. 92553
To be more specific regarding each item
Telephone 0038 487-2370
Fax (933) 487-2372
1. Security:
The college has 1-2 private security personnel patrolling the mounds.
B & D will retain an additional 2 security people from the same security
service. In addition B & D will, as it has been our intention. hire from the
San Jacinto Police Department a sworn Police officer who will be on duty
during all hours of operation of the Marketplace.
Also, B & D plans to make use of the Volunteer Police Reserve Unit (who
are also uniformed) by asking for 2 volunteers every weekend. this will
result in having up to 7 uniformed people performing as security
personneL
2. Blowing trash:
B & D will be employing 12 people who's sole responsibility,
during selling hours of the Marketplace. is to sweep and pick up
trash within the selling area and around the complete perimeter of
the College campus. See attached work schedule.
In addition to our own staff B & D plans to contract with Phoenix
House to do a final maintenance sweep and trash pick up of the
entire area including all of the college campus and all off the
surrounding neighborhoods every Saturday and Sunday night .
3. Traffic through the residential area:
Permits have been granted by CalTrans to place signs on State St. All signs
are temporary in nature and will be in place from 4 AM to 4 PM Saturday
and Sunday only.
Page 2
B & D Enterprises
The San Jacinto Marlaetplece
1477 N. State Street
San Jacinto. Ca. 92383
Telephone (908) 487-2370
Fax (909) 487-2372
B & D has submitted at the request of the Planning Department a report
from a traffic engineering firm. LSA, this report shows signing that
meet the requirements of the planning department.
A. Signs will be posted at the entrances to the south parking lot to
read:
NO MARKETPLACE PARKING ALLOWED
B. Sign to be placed on Romona Expressway eastbound above
Eagle Road to read:
SAN JACINTO MARKETPLACE
CUSTOMER PARKING
SECOND RIGHT
NO ENTRANCE ON EAGLE ROAD
C. Sign to be placed on Romona Expressway eastbound between
Eagle and State St. to read:
SAN JACINTO MARKETPLACE
CUSTOMER PARKING
RIGHT ON STATE
D. Sign to be placed on State St. between Romona Expressway
And Community College Drive to read:
SAN JACINTO MARKETPLACE
CUSTOMER PARKING
SECOND RIGHT
NO ENTRANCE ON COMMUNITY COLLEGE DRIVE
page 3
B & D Enterprises
The San Jacinto Marketplace
1477 N. State Street
San Jacinto. Ca. 92583
Telephone OM) 487-2370
Fax (903) 487-2372
E. Sign to be placed on Romona Expressway westbound to read:
SAN JACINTO MARKETPLACE
CUSTOMER PARKING
LEFT ON STATE STREET ONLY
F. Sign to be placed at Community College Drive and State St. northbound
to read;
NO PARKING
AND
NO ENTRANCE TO THE MARKETPLACE
THRU COMMUNITY COLLEGE DRIVE
G. Sign to be placed between Community College Drive and the North
driveway on State St. northbound;
SAN JACINTO MARKETPLACE
CUSTOMER PARKING
NEXT RIGHT
We respectfully request your approval of Conditional Use Permit 3-94.
Siycerely. .�
David Dudman
President
Page 4
058
needed
1&2. 3 &4
same
same
same
same
same
18c2
3&4
1&2
manag./3 &4
3&4
1&2
11&12
5&6
3&4
5&6
7&8
same
9&10
9&10
same
11&12
9.10.11&12
work scheduale
saturday
opening of marketplace
discription
set up restrooms
set up cones and barriers
set up signs
set up daily vendor check in station
set up Trash Barrels
take down sign poles in selling area
check monthly vendor space cards
direct vendor traffic & hand out daily app.
check empty spaces
assign daily spaces
take down daily check in station
lec2 break from 6:30 to 7:00
3&4 break from 7:15 to 7:45
during business hours
customer parking lot atendant
customer parking lot attendant
clean restrooms
sweep selling area
clean up perimeter
sweep selling area
clean restrooms
clean perimeter
5&6 break from 11:30 to 12
7&8 break from 2:30 to 3
9&10 break from 3 to 3:30
11 break from 2 to 2:30
12 break from 2:30 to 3
closing
take down signs
take down cones and barriers
empty trash barrells
clean up perimeter
hours
4am to 5
same
same
same
same
same
5am to 6:15
Sam to 7
6:15am to 6:30
6:30 to 7
7 to 7:15
Ito 11
11 to 4
7 to 3
7:45 to 11
7 to 3
12 to5
same
11 to 5
5 tot)
same
4to5
5to6
n
work scheduale
sundae
opening of marketplace
weeded discription hours
1&2. 3&4 set up restrooms 4am to 5
same
set up cones and barriers same
same set up signs same
same set up daily vendor check in station same
same
set up Trash Barrels same
same take down sign poles in selling area same
1&2 check monthly vendor space cards 5am to 6:15
3&4 direct vendor traffic & hand out daily app. 5am to 7
1&2 check empty spaces 6:15am to 6:30
tnana /3&4 assign daily spaces 6:30 to 7
g 3&4 take down daily check in station 7 to 7:15
1&2 break from 6:30 to 7:00
3&4 break from 7:15 to 7:45
during business hours
1&2 customer parking lot atendant 7 to 11
11&12 customer parking lot attendant 11 to 4
5&6 clean restrooms 7 to 3
3&4 sweep selling area 7:45 to 11
5&6 clean up perimeter 7 to 3
7&8 sweep selling area 12 to5
clean restrooms same
same 9&10 clean perimeter 12 to 5
5&6 break from 11:30 to 12
7&8 break from 2:30 to 3
0&10 break from 3 to 3:30
11 break from 2 to 2:30
12 break from 2:30 to 3
closing
9& 10
take down signs 5 to6 same take down cones and barriers same
11 & 12 empty trash barrens 4to5
clean upperimeter 5to6
9.10.11.12 5 to 6
same put back signs in parking lot
PRGE:02
,R-12 95 07:41 FROM:MT SRN JACINTO CDLLG ^g6546236 O:9096547337
Mt. San Jacinto Community College Disttict
San Jacinto Campus 1 499 North State Street, San Jacinto. California 92583-2399 (909) q87-frAS1C (6752)
April 1:, :995
Mayor David Solaria
Mayor Pro Tem James Oaks
i Council Member Jan Leahy
Council Member Patrick Williams
City of San Jacinto
316 East Main Street
I' san Jacinto, CA 92583
nd d Truisms
Clare Broyles ^ n 1
Ann Mona
Donortl Ronrobocher
Gwen Schionoe
Wayne Stuart
Roy B. Masan II. Ph.D.
Superintenainti Pnrdutt
Dear Council Member:
On the City Council agenda for April 18, 1995 is a proposal from
B & D Enterprises to operate a marketplace on the San Jacinto
College Campus. The College Board of Trustees and the College
administration fully support this proposal and request your
approval of this item.
We would like to make you aware of the many beneficial impacts
this will have on College operations, students and citizens of
San Jacinto.
Non -taxpayer funds will allow the College to expand
educational opportunities and enhance quality in our
programs.
Ten new jobs will be created for our students.
* This agreement creates additional work and jobs for
cafeteria employees. Our agreement with B & D Enterprises
gives the College all food and beverage concessions.
Rental of the previously unoccupied mobile home on campus as
the marketplace office has already provided revenue that
will be used to support a summer musical production.
Residents of San Jacinto will now have an additional high
3 quality cultural event to attend.
!-12 95 07:41 rROM:MT AN ..ACINTO COLUa ':109b54bcJb
Ii
nLJC . u..+
3 San Jacinto City Council Members
April L1, 199S
Page 2
Local citizens and residents will have a quality new and
unique products marketplace in a 'local and familiar
location.
We would also like to make you aware of some other background
information about College finances. MSJC has the lowest funded
service level of any college district in the State. The State
provides funding for less than 1% of our adult population. The
next lowest district received 2% and the state-wide average is
4%. Over the past two years we have reduced our enrollment 20%,
eliminated hundreds of classes and our summer session. The only
way we could operate a summer session this year was to rent our
campuses to another college.
Cur service area is 1700 square miles and extends to Banning/
Beaumont, Idyllwild, Anza, Temecula, Perris, Lake Elsinore and
San Jacinto. We attempt to serve more than 300,000 adults from
the San Diego County line to the San Bernardino County line.
Some have the perception that the College has an abundance of
money because of the $7-million building program now underway.
At this point in time the State has recognized our need to grow
and there is State bond money available for capital construction,
90 we build. But currently there is no money available to equip
or staff the new buildings. This is another reason why we need
to identify additional operating funds - and if they are non -
taxpayer entrepreneurial type funds all the better.
we are helping ourselves in this regard by applying for grants,
renting vacant facilities to other units of government,
contracting with other colleges for instruction and designing
custom training courses for local employers. We would also Like
the opportunity to operate the marketplace with our business
partner, B & D Enterprises.
If there is any additional information you need or want, please
do not hesitate to contact me, Wally Upper, Vice President of
Business Services or B & D Enterprises.
Sincerely,
"4"2-
Roy B. Mason, II
Superintendent/President
ofa\
1:44;-Vdel-11-114A1
6
NQP4'
14:.1-
3{7
lgfi 4:1-1 .k/s4
31-1� i3
This petition is---
ahi ch borders Commr i College Drive and Eagle :reet, opposing an
Dpen air market to‘-4 held on weekends at Mt San Jacinto College..
Some of the many reasons are:
nPJ4
1. Heavy weekend traffic, plus routing it one-way on
Community College Drive and Eagle Street.
3 Carbon Monoxide from 2,000 automobiles, expected each day.
2. The element it will bring into our neighborhood.
4. Merchants in San Jacinto and Hemet have served us well and
deserve our support, not competition from outsiders.
We have had a good relationship with administrators, faculty and
etWe support their concerts, plays, sports,
etcc..,, stbutudents at do the not
ot feel an open air market is necessary or appropriate. and would
Some of our residents have emphysema and are on oxygen
not be able to tolerate the fumes of car's exhausts in such traffic.
We are sure that other problems would arise, so are protesting
the open air market at Mt. San Jacinto College.
2.
3.�C/�
4.
6.
7. r
9.
10.
I1.
12.
13.
14.
15.
NAME
, 1•.
,--17.Y`-
.n1
(continued)
. -vrl.
5- ►•
•
ADDRESS
/ F
/?/1
/3 2
/. 7 �--� :a —
(PA l,1 C I C H 7)44 17 KV4 L
/J /C U/f.[iv2-�✓
jJis'+VTi-tt
S7
II
/
(�
iL1 I ,i — Lam,
. cC r-v �2 S .
.
\ /
18. v
19. �.,� �C10.e.do�_
22.
23 .
24.
26.
pfi
27.r
p
28.
29. _
33. j f 4. �L f ir.i..•
3 4. 1 lit 9 7 7i _;"TT'
35 . .
31 .
I , . •• C1 \ V1' _n.•
3 6 . -;7 7l•1..u,e Q—7177,4,c 7j5
37. �2 '`
38.
39.
40. _
41 . \ I _
l
42. CCC _ ,��-
43. � ��c.a. %/ ��!.4.f're Al
(continued)
((
,
Jn5
/ 33p S:e,.�s_..� • .
•
•
�i `{Z
'
/• ( 1
/ J/ef , .(.: 9= s/
4 4 .
45.
;.
47.
48.
49. 2-
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
-9.
59.
60.
61.
62.
(� Jr.
/) J.:B
/,
��/7 'L /
� G �?' ((
/ l.--.2 /k.,-e ,'Q
.,/q / ? 6zzai .,,,z., 6z,„,._.;.
mu l ,
31, .
it
I.
6 3.9
64.
C.
65.
66. ].fA
6 8 . v - � ' "`-cjA-1..-- -•_
69.
T0.
(continued)
/3/7
/,a144.14A-a. -1.eiLze05. <71
/3:L/3 *04 „lad S' rr^^LL r
/3 a 3 %�.(,Ql1i1_.cL'_d
I
r / rr
jr
le.1-"PL"-r1-4_
f 3•3 ', A.6G'7/) -r: 4.7.7�_d di) 2
//%�I' d�i42 2
/r v
•
/3
/..
4 ." { t•L r�
/ 2 (L 1 )) • ,L.x-Ll.�(�
v
13 S /d ,L, v -S �r•Lr L ��-r,
7 4 7
/3ti1( SiL-:12:i4_ <r-/riJr.¢
441-4 veg,e, L."
ft
I
CO" /g-r- 1
79 Q 80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
M
•
/3 v,( z� ,
_Fif;.45:4z.dA,e7T.-
/_Fa,�
)53.z7 Q
/ s 7s- vAw?ll
S-91C 45/4"-Af .e cam. ) et
SUNRISE UNIT r .•,. N':
HOMEOWNERS ASS'N.
540 COMMUNITY COLLEGE DR.
SAN JACINTO, CA. 92583
December 23, 1994
Mayor and City Council
City of San Jacinto
316 East Main Street
San Jacinto, California 92583
It has come to the attention of the Homeowners of Collese ge
I.
neighbors of Mt. San Jacinto College on Community se
Drive and Eagle Street, that an
open
aaair
arketoonMweekends is
nto
being considered for the campusorparking
the element it
wouuld bring intoosthe oldgb. ecnte of area the yasfwell fic casgnumerous other problems,
w
the Homeowners of Sunrise I are indeed concerned.
With a flea market at the Ramona Bowl, one at a highschool in
Hemet and a small one left in San Jacinto, we do not feel one
at the college is necessary.
Your consideration to this letter would be appreciated.
Sincerely,
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
SUNRISE I
Felicitas Taylor,
Secretary
cc: President and Trustees
Mt. San Jacinto College
1499 North State Street
San Jacinto, Ca.
SuNRISE UNIT I
540 Community College Dr.
San Jacinto, :a. ?25F33
^ring
Marco 15, 1995
misted below are our concerns regarding .a permit for an onen-=ir-
market at Mt. San Jacinto College.
1. We think the decrease in our property value is significant.
2. The dust from the dirt parking lot.
3. The increase in traffic.
4. The litter on our commonground spread by the wind and people
attending the open-air-murket.
5. Our tax dollar being used to provide restruums fur those
attending the open -air -market.
6. Element of people being brought into our neighborhoods.
Why ask for more than we already have as Ear as crime?
If the Planning Commission are going to grant this permit, then we
.could like to see the following on a conditional use permit:
1. This permit should be issued for no longer than one (1) year
and at that point the City should evulu,Le now the operation
has proceeded with these conditions.
A water truck should he brought in every morning to spray
the unpaved parking lot and it should be sprayed again at noon.
3. Signs should be made and paid Cor by B D Enterprise, to be
posted on Community College er., fold 7I-.., and Eagle St.,
stating that from 8:00a.m. to 4:OOp.m. for Students and
Residents Only.
4. A specified num.l�erof people to take cure uC trash clean-up.
5. A specified number of people Lu Lake care uC p,irking.
6. A specified :ow level noise Crum generators, etc.
7, A specified time for vendor:; Ir, eme in .inn i L-ul>, Not.
before 6:00a.m
8. Destruction to restrooms to be paid for by B&D Enterprise.
9. Security to be paid for by BEND Enterprise.
We feel that a permit should not bp_ given to or for this open -air -
market because it is going to have an abstaining opinion.
2,
BEST. BEST & KRIEGER
RTMUR L. TTLCWORTN•
_EN C. STEPHEMS•
.ILLIAM R O[WOLFC•
ARTON C OANT•
MAUL T SELZER•
DALLAS HOLMES•
OHRISTOPHER L. CARPENTER.
RICHARD T ANDERSON•
.OHN O. WAHLIN•
MICHAEL O. HARRIS.
W CURT EALY•
JOHN C. SPOWN•
MICHAEL T. RIODELI•
MEREDITH A. JURY•
MICHAEL GRANT•
FRANCIS J. SAUM•
ANNE T THOMAS•
O. MARTIN NETHERY•
GEORGE M. REVES
WILLIAM W. FLOYD. JR.
GREGORY L. MAROKE
KENDALL H. MACVEY
CLARK M. ALSOP
DAVID J. ERWIN•
MICHAEL J. ANDELSON•
OOUCLA! 1 PHILLIPS•
ANTONIA ORAPMOS
GREGORY K. WILKINSON
• A ,SOPESPIOMAL COKPOMATIOM
DSP65311
• IMPTNYKMP M.CLVOMO PKPI{P[10M ORATION.
LAWYERS
w 'NNE S. FURTH
GENE TAMAKA
BASIL T CHAPMAN
TIMOTHY N. CONNOR
JICTOR L. WOLF
DANIEL C. OLIVIER
HOWARD S. GOLDS
STEPHEN P. OEITSCH
MARC C. EMPET
JOMM R. ROT TSCHACFCR
MARTIN A. MUELLER
J. MICHAEL SUMMEROUR
VICTORIA N. KING
SCOTT C. SMITH
JACK S. CLARKE. JR.
BRIAN M. LEWIS
BRAOLEY E. NCUFELO
PETER M. SARMACK
MATT M. MORRIS
. DUNN
STEVEN COESAUN
ERIC L.
DENNIS M. COTA
PATRICK M.W.F. PEARCE
A. SON
WILLIAM ODAHLING. JR.
ROBERT W
KIRK W. SMITH
JASON O. DASAREINER
KYLE A. SNOW
HARK A. EASTER
DIANE L. FINLEY
MICHELLE OUELLETTE
DAVID P PHIPPEN. SR.
SUSAN C. NAUSS
BERNIE L. WILLIAMSON
[ E V IN K. RANDOLPH
JAMES S. GILPIN
MARSHALL 1 RUOOLPH
KIM A. !FIRERS
CTNTMIA M. OCRMANO
MARY C. OILSTRAP
GLENN P. SASINC
DIANE C. SLA SOEL
DOROTHY I. ANDERSON
G. HENRY WELLES
JAMES P. HARPER
OIMA O. HARRIS
SARSARA R. BARON
RICHARD T. EDGER
PATRICK D. OOLAN
DEAN R. OCRLETH
HELENE P
EMILY P HEMPHILL
SONIA RUSKS CARVALMO
DORM O. PINKNEY
VIA EXPRESS MAIL
Honorable City Council
City of San Jacinto
201 East Main Street
San Jacinto, CA 92583
GEARING D. ENGLISH
THEODORE J. GRISWOLD
JULIANN ANDERSON
.EFFRCY R. THORPE
•ORA H WILSON
PATRICIA STARS CISNEROS
JACOUELINE E. BAILEY
MARK O. RECKER
0. ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ
SUSAN C. DUMOUCHEL
JENNIFER OLSON DOLAN
ALEXANORA F. LOPEZ
JULIE ROBERTS FUROERSON
DAVID J. HANCOCK
JOAN M. MUCKABONE
PHILI► M. SAVAGE
DAVID CARPAL
NANCY E. DAVIS
MICHAEL S. HENDERSON
NARC T. RANCH
MICHELE A. POWERS
CHRIST J. SCISER
RAYMOND BEST 115SB•IBB71
JAMES H. KRICOEN (1913-107B1
EUGENE BEST IISSSMBSII
March 31, 1995
Re: Appeal of Planning Commission
Use Permit 3-94
Honorable City Council:
This firm represents Maclin Markets, Inc. ("Maclin").
Background.
For years Maclin operated an open air market in San Jacinto
until the City initiated a series of land use and infrastructure
financing decisions that culminated in Maclin's inability to
continue its business in the City. Our firm spent considerable
time assisting Maclin in writing a development agreement that
incorporated your new zoning and general plan designations imposed
by the City on Maclin's property. After Maclin devoted
considerable effort, expense, and time to this endeavor, Maclin was
unable to continue its operation due to the heavy economic
participation required by the City. The terms of the development
agreement under discussion were no longer acceptable. Ultimately,
Maclin was forced to move its business elsewhere.
We received notice last month that after imposing
insurmountable infrastructure requirements on Maclin's use, San
Jacinto had approved a swap meet at 1996 Ramona Boulevard by
issuing a temporary use permit. Dust control and the issuance of
n C1 7 0 RECEIVED CITY CLERKS OFF.
APR 3 1995
By —la
in
1
SUITE 3I?•
39700 BOB HOPE DRIVE
POST OFFICE BOX 1555
RANCHO MIRAGE. CALIFORNIA 92270
TELEPHONE 1S191 55B•2511
TELECOPIER (5191 340.5599
OF COUNSEL
-AMES O. COMMON
C. MICHAEL COWETY
BRUCE W. BEACH
ARLENE PRATER
.0MM C. TOBIN
OFFICES IN
RIVERSIDE I SOB) SB5•IASO
PALM SPRINGS(RIS/ 37A•7EBA
ONTARIO (SOS) BSS•BOSA
SAN 01E00 (SIB) 595M333
Denial of Conditional
, LAW OFFICES OF
BEST, BEST & KRIEGEr'
rionorable City Council
City of San Jacinto
March 31, 1995
Page 2
building and business permits were the only conditions imposed on
the new project. Generally, we feel that the City's disparate
treatment of these similarly situated projects after requiring so
much of Maclin is illegal.
Recently, we received notice of a new swap meet application
regarding a swap meet proposed by B & D Development at Mount San
Jacinto College (the "project"). As a potential competitor with
the B & D Development swap meet, Maclin opposes the City's approval
of the project for the following reasons: (1) approval of the
project constitutes a rezoning of the College's property in
violation of State land use laws, (2) approval of the project
pursuant to a conditional use permit violates the State and federal
constitutions, including the equal protection and due process
clauses of both and (3) approval of the project pursuant to the
proposed negative declaration violates the California Environmental
Quality Act.
The City Planning Commission denied B & D Development's
conditional use application at the Planning Commission meeting of
March 15, 1995. It is my understanding that B & D Development has
appealed the Planning Commission decision to the City Council and
that the City Council will address the appeal at a public hearing
scheduled for April 18, 1995, at 7:30 p.m.
2. General Plan inconsistency.
San Jacinto Municipal Ccde Section 17.01 requires that uses
authorized pursuant to conditional use permits conform to the
City's general plan:
"[A] conditional use permit may be granted provided such
use would [be] in consistency with the particular zone
and underlying General Plan."
Although Section 17.12(A) of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 5-93
purports to exempt temporary CUP's from compliance with the zoning
ordinance, it does not exempt them from conformance with the
general plan. San Jacinto's general plan designates this area for
institutional uses. The staff report suggests that simply because
the swap meet will raise revenue for the College, the swap meet is
incidental to a public institutional use.
California courts have rejected this analysis. In People ex
rel. Cooper v. Rancho Santiago College (1990) 226 Cal.App.3d 1281,
a California Court of Appeal held that a swap meet on a community
college site could not be tied into "the educational process
DSP65311
LAW OFFICES OF
BEST, BEST & KI .3Es.
Honorable City Council
City of San Jacinto
March 31, 1995
?age 3
, I. ra
[because] 20 percent of its proceeds are turned over to the
school". The Court held that as such, the swap meet should be
considered a "nonclassroom facility" subject to Santa Ana's zoning
ordinance. It is absurd to conclude that any revenue raising
activity -- no matter how pernicious its environmental impacts be
or
regardless of its effects on the neighborhood --would
plan
consistent with San Jacinto's institutional general
designation as long as some of its revenue goes to the college.
3. State zoning laws.
The San Jacinto temporary conditional use permit ordinance
(Zoning Ordinance Amendment 5-93) allows any use in any zone. This
violates State planning and zoning laws. California Government
Code Section 65850 requires that zoning amendments be adopted by a
City's legislative body, in this case, the City Council. By
allowing the City Planning Commission to approve any use in any
zone for a period of five or more years, San Jacinto's ordinance
impermissibly delegates to the Planning Commission legislative
authority vested by State law exclusively in the City Council.
4. Constitutional considerations.
San Jacinto's temporary use permit ordinance violates the due
process and equal protection clauses of the federal and State
constitutions. As mentioned above, State planning laws require
that City Councils approve all zone changes, subject to the
procedural notice and hearing requirements set forth in State
planning laws. Rezoning property without providing 1eighbo
ring
property owners and other interested parties those safeguards
deprives them of due process.
The temporary use permit also violates Maclin's equal
protection rights. As a business operator in a commercial zone,
Maclin was forced to comply with all City regulations and to
provide all infrastructure necessary to carry out its buin a sinessiin
that zone. By allowing a commercial use to occurunnecessary, the
zone where compliance with those regulations is
City places Maclin at an unfair disadvantage without a rational
basis. This violates Maclin's equal protection rights.
5. Permanent "temporary" uses.
Section 17.12 of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 5-93 allows the
Planning Commission to approve temporary uses for up to five years,
subject to an indefinite number of extensions. Many cities have
similar special use permits for temporary uses for such things as
DSP65311
LAW OFFICES OF
BEST, BEST & KRIEGE}.
0073
Honorable City Council
City of San Jacinto
March 31, 1995
Page 4
one -day sidewalk sales, concessions, food carts adjacent to retail
businesses and the like. A swap meet that occurs on every weekend
and potentially in perpetuity is not really a temporary use.
Staff's assertion that "a swap meet located in the San Jacinto
valley will provide residents with this type of shopping experience
with minimal driving time" suggests that this use is anticipated to
be more than just a passing event.
6. Neighborhood impacts.
Section 17.04(C) (3) (b) prohibits the issuance of CUP's that
will "be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or
materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity." The Planning Commission cannot make these findings for
this application.
Although the swap meet itself is not proposed to be located
immediately adjacent to the college's residential neighbors, the
proposed parking area immediately abuts a residential subdivision.
Residents of these homes would be accustomed to some traffic from
the college during the week. However, they would not be used to
the heavy traffic and noise a swap meet would generate on weekends.
The college contributes a dignified appearance to the
neighborhood, with its large green space and open layout. By
allowing the temporary structures, tents and clutter associated
with a swap meet, the City will permit a degradation of this
appearance inconsistent with the site's public institutional
general plan designation.
7. CEQA.
City staff proposes approval of this project subject to a
negative declaration based on staff's Environmental Checklist Form
dated January 23, 1995. The checklist is a cursory listing of
potential environmental impacts preceded by an explanation of five
potential impacts. As such, the checklist fails to comply with
State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(d) (14 Cal. Code of Regs. Sec.
15063(d)) as amended in 1994. That section now provides:
(1) A description of the project including the location
of the project;
(2) An identification of the environmental setting;
(3) An identification of environmental effects by use of
a checklist, matrix, or other method, provided that
DSP65311
LAW OFFICES OF
BEST, BEST & KF: 3Eh
Honorable City Council
City of San Jacinto
March 31, 1995
Page 5
0(74
entries on a checklist or other form are briefly
explained to indicate that there is some evidence to
support the entries. The brief explanation may be either
through a narrative or a reference to another information
source such as an attached map, photographs, or an
earlier EIR or negative declaration. A reference to
another document should include where appropriate, a
citation to the page or pages where the information is
found.
(4) A discussion of ways to mitigate the significant
effects identified, if any;
(5) An examination of whether the project would be
consistent with existing zoning, plans, and other
applicable land use controls;
(6) The name of the person or persons who prepared or
participated in the Initial Study.
This means that, with the exception of five impact areas, the
environmental checklist lacks the brief explanation of the initial
study conclusions Section 15063(d) requires.
The following checklist conclusions are without basis.
a. Land use.
The land use section of the checklist asks whether the project
would conflict with general plan or zoning designations. The
impact analysis summary states that the general plan designates the
site as "Public Institution" and states chat since the swap meet
will be "a fund raising venture" for the College, it is consistent
with that designation.
This analysis fails for two reasons. First, as indicated
above, a California Court of Appeal has held that the mere fact
that a swap meet raises revenue for a community college does not
make it consistent with land use designations that apply to the
college.
Second, the checklist was clearly intended to focus on the
physical impacts of land use proposals vis-a-vis the general plan
designation. The staff's conclusion that the swap meet will raise
money for the college provides no analysis of the impacts of the
actual use under an institutional general plan designation clearly
inconsistent with the commercial proposal.
SP65311
• LAW OFFICES OF I
BEST, BEST & KRIEGE?c
Honorable City Council
City of San Jacinto
March 31, 1995
Page 6
(1'75
This same analysis holds true in determining whether the
project's inconsistency with the zoning ordinance is
environmentally significant. The only analysis on this issue
states in a circular fashion that since the Zoning Ordinance allows
"temporary" uses for up to five years, those uses are presumed to
be environmentally insignificant. CEQA requires an analysis of a
project's land use impacts whether or not the project is permitted
under local land use laws.
b. water,.
The checklist concludes with out analysis that the proposed
project will have no impact on water resources. The checklist
fails to provide any analysis of whether greater use of the College
parking lot would result in alternations to the quality of surface
runoff (checklist item 4(c)). Presumably more cars in the area
would create the potential for more discharges.
c. Transportation.
The initial study concludes (without a traffic study) that
traffic impacts will be insignificant. The study lacks any
analysis of traffic impacts on specific intersections and any
analysis of the adequacy of ingress and egress to the site in
weekend traffic.
The study states that "to alleviate any potential traffic
problems and hazards on weekends, the proponents are proposing to
utilize traffic monitors to help control traffic." The study does
not state whether these monitors will be sworn peace officers
empowered to control traffic or whether they will simply be citizen
crossing guards. It makes no mention of safeguards for the
personal safety of the monitors. Furthermore, the study does not
state whether this is a required mitigation measure. If it is, the
project fails to include a mitigation monitoring program to monitor
the implementation and the effectiveness of this mitigation
measure.
d. Air quality.
The checklist concludes that the project's air quality impacts
will be insignificant because it will alleviate cross -traffic
caused by San Jacinto residents driving to other swap meets. It
fails completely to analyze the possibility that the project could
create new vehicle trips with new mobile sources of pollution.
DSP65311
• LAW OFFICES OF
BEST, BEST & K. :GEN
Honorable City Council
City of San Jacinto
March 31, 1995
Page 7
e. Noise.
The initial study concludes that noise may be created by new
activities on weekends. Although the checklist concludes that this
impact will be insignificant, we submit that in an area accustomed
to weekend breaks from the noise associated with weekday uses at
the college, the noise impacts of the project on weekends will be
significant.
The checklist states that the City will limit the project's
hours of operation and will prohibit the use of sound systems or
speakers. The study does not state whether these are required
mitigation measures. If they are, the project fails to include a
mitigation monitoring program to monitor the implementation and the
effectiveness of the mitigation measure.
f. Public services.
Maclin believes that the proposed swap meet will create a
significant impact on public services due to increased traffic and
the potential for crime at the swap meet site.
Impacts and blight from displaced businesses.
g•
The initial study should analyze the project's impacts on
existing businesses in the City subject to commercial zoning
designations and the potential blight from the displacement of
those businesses as the swap meet replaces them in the local
economy
Maclin Markets respectfully requests that the City Council
deny B & D Development's appeal of the Planning Commission denial
of CUP 3-94 based on the comment contained in this letter.
Respectfully submitted,
\c/*
Douglas S. Phillips
Scott C. Smith
of Best, Best & Krieger
SCS:rgs
cc: Greg Hahn, Maclin Markets
Mt. San Jacinto College
DSP65311
lipowiromiro
A N
a -
Staff Report
JACI NTO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Les Evans, Director of Public Works
via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: April 18, 1995
RE: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR ADAPTIVE REUSE
OF THE MARK TWAIN MEMORIAL BRIDGE
Recommendation:
Direct staff on how to proceed.
Background:
The Missouri Highway and Transportation Department is requesting proposals for the
acquisition and re -use of the Mark Twain Memorial Bridge erected in 1934 to carry Route
35 over the Mississippi River at Hannibal, Missouri. The Bridge will be marked for
reassembly, dismantled and packaged for further handling by the new owner. Costs of
disassembly and packaging will be borne by Missouri Highway and Transportation
Department. Shipping the bridge to a new site and reassembling the bridge will be the
responsibility of the new owner. According to the Department of Transportation, the
bridge will not be available until 1998. However, proposals for re -use of the bridge are
due by May 12, 1995.
Description of the Bridge:
The bridge consists of two Warren through truss spans each measuring 300 feet in
length with an estimated weight of 605,000 pounds, two continuous cantilevered through
truss spans each measuring 563.75 feet in length with an estimated combined weight
of 3,023,000 pounds, two 175-foot deck truss spans each weighing about 392,500
pounds, two 80-foot deck truss spans each weighing about 106,200 pounds and, finally,
two 40-foot and five 51-foot steel stringer spans with un-estimated weights. The
estimated weights apply only to the steel members of each span. The width of the
bridge roadway is 22 feet and could be modified to 24 feet.
Page Two
Mark Twain Bridge
April 18, 1995
If ownership of the bridge is transferred from Missouri Highway and Transportation
Department to another party, the transfer deed will include preservation covenants that
require the new owner to re -erect and maintain the bridge in accordance with
recommendations in The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and
Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings.
The following two paragraphs are taken from the Missouri Highway Department request
for proposal:
"We prefer that the bridge be reused in an acceptable manner reflecting its original
purpose such as the public transportation of motor vehicles, bicycles, or pedestrians.
However, in the interest of preserving the bridge, the need for transportation usage is
not a firm requirement exclusive of other innovative adaptations. Maps, sketches, and
photographs of the proposed bridge site and the surrounding area will also be useful in
the evaluation of your proposal. We ask that you provide specific data regarding the
intended use, future use, public access of the bridge, and the financial resources
available to transport, re -erect, and maintain the bridge at the new location. Also,
indicate if you intend to have the bridge listed on the National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP) or otherwise promote public interest in the site. For further information
concerning your proposal, please contact our office.
If the bridge is transferred to you, these concerns will become your responsibility.
Depending on the nature of your proposal, conveyance of the bridge might require
agreement to certain conditions, restrictions, and limitations. Potential protective
covenants will be discussed with all prospective recipients after a review of proposals.
It is not our intent to demand reconstruction with severe conditions. We seek to assure
a tasteful and useful applicr pion of the Mark Twain Memorial Bridge in keeping with its
historic character and sign Dance."
Condition of the Bridge
The bridge deck is reinforced concrete and is in need of major repair. The condition of
the structural steel is fair, however, cracks have developed at the connections where the
deck truss stingers tie into floor beams. Costs of repair for the entire span of the bridge
are estimated at over $1,800,000. With the City of San Jacinto only requiring a half of
the bridge, the costs of repair are estimated to be $900,000. (See this figure on page
3 - under installation of a new concrete deck). These costs do not include any upgrades
which may be required to meet California seismic standards or other safety standards
which may be desirable.
Page Three
Mark Twain Bridge
April 18, 1995
Cost of Installation of the Bridge
Although no detailed costs have been developed, costs of constructing roadway
approaches to the bridge, installing two concrete piers in the San Jacinto River to
support the bridge, reassembling the bridge and providing a new concrete deck have
been estimated.
Approaches and channel improvement
(cost estimate is based on a 1993
cost estimate by ASL Engineering
for a new Lake Park Drive Bridge)
Installation of concrete piers
(cost estimate is based on a 1994
cost estimate prepared by City staff
for a grant application)
Reassembling the bridge
(cost estimate is one-half the estimated
cost of dismantling the bridge)
Install a new concrete deck
(cost estimate is based on an estimate
prepared by the Missouri Department
of Highways and Transportation)
Total estimated cost of installation of
the Mark Twain Memorial Bridge in
San Jacinto (costs of engineering, shipping,
seismic and safety improvements or historic
rehabilitation are unknown and have not been
included in the estimates)
$1,000,000
$ 250,000
$ 500,000
$ 900,000
$2,650,000
Page Four
Mark Twain Bridge
April 18, 1995
Cost of Shipping the Disassembled Bridge to San Jacinto
City staff has inquired about the cost of shipping the (2) 563.75 foot sections to San
Jacinto by truck and by rail. The two sections weigh a total of about 6 million pounds.
At the time of preparation of this staff report, the costs of shipping were still unknown.
This cost should be available at the City Council meeting.
Cost to Ship, Improve and Install the Mark Twain
Memorial Bridge Compared with Construction of a
New Bridge
Cost of new 40 foot wide concrete bridge
(estimated by ASL Engineers in 1993, including
Engineering)
Estimated cost of Mark Twain Memorial Bridge (not
including engineering, shipping, seismic and safety
upgrades, or historic rehabilitation)
Recommendation
$6,000,000
$2,650,000
After all costs are researched and included, the acquisition and installation of the Mark
Twain Memorial Bridge in San Jacinto would probably cost between $3 million and $4
million.
The City has an annual cash flow of about $167,000 from the Redevelopment Project
Area formed in 1985 to assist in financing the Lake Park Drive bridge. This cash flow
would support a bond issue of up to $1.5 million. In order to prepare a competitive
proposal for the bridge, the City must develop a source of funds for an additional $1.5 -
$2.5 million depending on the actual total cost to obtain and install the Mark Twain
Memorial Bridge. The financing mechanism, or source of funds, should be identified in
the proposal which is due by May 12, 1995.
However, if the City Council wishes to prepare a proposal, staff recommends a "team"
of experts be assembled to travel to Hannibal to evaluate the bridge and put together
detailed cost estimates for seismic and structural retrofit, historic rehabilitation and
required safety improvements. A budget of $25,000 should be established for this
evaluation as well as the costs of preparing a competitive proposal. Funds in the
amount of $250,000 generated by the Redevelopment Agency, for the purpose of
constructing a bridge at Lake Park Drive, are available for evaluation
of the bridge and preparation of a proposal.
11.14
A N
Ai �.Y � � Li, i ems...
Staff Report
JACINTO.
TO: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Pamela S. Easter
DATE: April 18, 1995
RE: WARREN ROAD
Recommendation:
Authorize closing of Warren Road to through traffic between Ramona Expressway and
Cottonwood Avenue for a one -week period in late April or early May for repair of a 1,000
foot section north of Cottonwood Avenue.
Background
The City Council has awarded a bid for the repair of a 1,000 foot section of Warren Road
north of Cottonwood Avenue. The area to be repaired includes the pavement adjacent
to the Mitchell property. The contractor has advised us that the subgrade (the dirt under
the pavement) is still too wet to form a good foundation for new pavement. City staff has
agreed with the contractor to delay the repair until the subgrade is dry. We expect the
repair work will take place in late April or early May. The contractor would like
permission to close the road to through traffic (subject to advance notification) during the
repair period.
The City has awarded a contract for the design of a pavement rehabilitation contract for
Warren Road between Ramona Expressway and Cottonwood Avenue. The plans have
been completed and submitted to Caltrans for approval. The Caltrans approval is
required because $283,000 of Federal Funds are to be used in the project. We
anticipate construction of the pavement rehabilitation project in the Fall.
City crews have continued to patch potholes on Warren Road on a regular basis. An
inspection of Warren Road on April 4,1995 revealed evidence of recent patching and no
areas where additional pothole patching would be effective.
Warren Road has been posted SLOW, LOOSE GRAVEL, ROUGH ROAD. Staff can
recommend no additional safety measures.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
7.5
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
STAFF REPORT
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
April 18, 1995
PLANNING COMMISSION RESPONSIBILITIES AND MONTHLY
STIPEND
RECOMMENDATION
Advise staff as appropriate.
BACKGROUND
This is a follow-up to the direction of the City Council during the joint City
Council/Planning Commission meeting of March 28, 1995.
The City Council agreed to study the Planning Commission's request for an increase in
its stipend from its current $100.00 level.
The City Council asked for a copy of the Planning Commission's job description and for
a salary survey. The job description is attached for your information. The salary survey
results are as follows:
Beaumont
Coachella
Corona
Hemet
La Quinta
Lake Elsinore
Moreno Valley
Perris
Norco
Banning
Murrieta
Temecula
$15.00/meeting
$50.00/meeting
$50.00/meeting
$20.00/meeting
$50.00/meeting
$50.00/meeting
$150.00/month
$220.00/month
Was $20.00/month, now is $.00
$.00
$.00
$.00
There is no statutory limit to a Planning Commission stipend.
The City's current pay philosophy is $100.00/month, no matter how many meetings
($0.00 if a Commissioner attends no meetings). Normally, there is one meeting a month.
Occasionally, there are two meetings a month.
BKM:Ir CCRPT-95\Stipend. Rep
EXHIBIT "A"
PLANNING COMMISSION
The Planning Commission shall consist of five members appointed by the Mayor subject
to the approval of the City Council. Members of the Commission shall be appointed for
a four year term. As a condition of Office, members must be a resident of the City or of
the City Sphere of Influence. However, only two such members may reside in the City
Sphere of Influence.
POWERS AND DUTIES
A Planning Commissioner is responsible for planning and zoning duties specified by law
or ordinance not expressly delegated or reserved to another body or officer. In this
capacity, a Commissioner works closely with Staff and the City Council to ensure that
proper development activities occur in the City. The duties of Planning Commissioner are
described in Section 65103 of the Government Code and in the Planning Commission By -
Laws, and are as follows:
1. Cause the preparation, periodically review, and revise, as necessary, the General
Plan.
2. Implement the General Plan through actions including, but not limited to, the
administration of Specific Plans, zoning and subdivision ordinances.
3. Review the capital improvement program for consistency with the General Plan.
4. Endeavor to promote public interest in, or comment on, and understanding of the
General Plan, and regulations relating to it.
5. Consult and advise public officials and agencies, public utility companies, civic,
educational, professional, and other organizations, and citizens generally
concerning implementation of the General Plan.
6. Promote the coordination of local plans and programs with the plans and
programs of other public agencies.
7. Perform other functions as the City Council provides, including conducting studies
and preparing plans other than those required or authorized above.
Other duties include conducting proceedings for adopting or amending general and
specific plans, changes of zone, amendments to the text of the zoning ordinance, appeals
and review of land division maps. The Commission shall also perform the duties specified
by ordinance concerning proceedings on applications for conditional use permits,
variances, Planned Unit Developments, and development plans, including matters
pertaining to architecture and site planning. The Commission is also responsible for
analyzing and adopting environmental documents pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act and the City Environmental Guidelines.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: April 18, 1995
SUBJECT: FEE DEFERRAL PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION
Advise staff as appropriate
BACKGROUND
On May 3, 1994, the City Council adopted an Ordinance that waived certain development
related fees and deferred others. The Ordinance sunsets on June 30, 1995. The
purpose of the Ordinance was to attempt to stimulate development, which seemed to be
coming to a halt.
Since the Ordinance went into effect, five non-residential building permits were issued and
71 single family residential permits. Of the five, staff believes one project went ahead
because of the fee waiver. We are also trying to structure an industrial expansion that will
only work with the fee waiver in effect. Based on the testimony received in 1994,
"Treasures" and "Heartland" would not have been able to proceed without the City fee
program. These two projects constitute 30 of the 71 residential permits issued.
Additionally, we have prepared 12 more permits for these projects at the request of
Peacock Financial. They should be issued by May.
While the balance of the 41 permits benefitted from the fee program, staff is unclear
whether or not the builders would have proceeded without our program.
We have received innumerable positive comments regarding our fee program. There are
two projects, Park Hill Village and Jacinto West, that may be re -started in the next year.
The potential developers have indicated the projects are marginal. There is an excellent
chance those projects won't proceed without the fee program in effect. A church is in
escrow on an East Main Street property and has expressed interest in a long term fee
waiver.
April 18, 1995
Page No. 2
Due to expenditures from Fund 28, (the Park Fund) for various projects, this fund is nearly
depleted. The fee in effect, $525.00/unit, is inadequate to fund 5 acres of park per 1000
people, which is the City standard. The actual fee probably should be closer to
$2500/unit.
On the housing side, prices have not appreciated in the Valley. Most projects are not
buildable due to a combination of low prices and high fees. Some projects are so
marginal that $525.00 per unit could make or break the project.
The choices of the City Council are as follows:
1. Determine whether or not to continue with the fee waiver program.
2. If the Council desires to continue the fee program, it needs to determine whether
to adopt the identical program as last year, or to amend it. A possible amendment
might be to change the park fee from a waived fee to a deferral fee.
3. The length of time to continue the program is the final issue the Council needs to
determine. Staff does not forsee any substantial change in development activity
or pricing for at least one more year. The potential developers of the marginal
projects are running their pro-formas out two years. Possible choices range from
a short term continuation of the program (six months) to an extension for up to two
years.
If the Council desires to continue the waiver/deferral program, staff will bring back the
necessary ordinance at a subsequent regular meeting.
BKM:ga CCRPT-95\Waiverfe.may
EXHIBIT "A"
INTERIM FEE WAIVER AND PAYMENT POLICY
EXPIRING JUNE 30, 1995
The following fees shall be paid subject to the following:
1. Payable at Final Map approval, prior to recordation:
Tentative Map Application Fee
Final Map Application Fee
1. Payable at building permit issuance:
Flood Control Improvement Fee
2. Payable at either close of escrow (sfr) or final occupancy issuance (comm/ind),
as applicable to the type of development:
Water Capital Improvement Fee
Fire Station Mitigation Fee
Building Permit Surcharge
Current Planning Fee
Advance Planning Fee
Fire Sprinklers Inspection Fee
All remaining City Development Fees, as depicted on Exhibit "B", for Single Family
Residential and Commercial/Industrial development shall be waived until the end of the
1994/1995 Fiscal Year, June 30, 1995.
This Ordinance has no effect on plan check, building permit, and/or application/review
fees not expressly indicated herein or on Exhibit "B".
OF sac: JAc_..To
EXHIBIT "B"
DEVELOPMENT FEES
August :991
tegional Transportation 5 820.00 per acre
.ocai Transportation
500.00 per acre
public Buildings
65.00 per acre
'load Control Improvement
Area #1
Area #2
5990.00 per acre
4975.00 per acre
'raffia Signalitation
SF Units
MP' Units
Subdivision
Commercial
:arpool Mitigation Fee
150.00 per dwelling unit
100.00 per dwelling unit
2700.00 per acre
2700.00 per acre
90.00 per dwelling unit
Ater Capital Imp Fee
Residential
Commercial
ity Sewer Fee
Residential
Commercial
ublic Safety Structures
Residential
Commercial
250.00 per dwelling unit
200.00 per 15 PFU
200.00 per dwelling unit
200.00 per 20 PFU
50.00 per dwelling unit
0.01 per square foot of lot area
ublic Safety Equipment
Residential
Commercial
10.00 per dwelling unit
0.01 per square foot of lot area
ark Fee
SF Detached
SF Attached
2-4 Units
5+ Units
Mobilehomes
525.24 per dwelling unit
314.46 per dwelling unit
460.62 per dwelling unit
402.48 per dwelling unit
290.52 per dwelling unit
ndergrounding Fee
50.00 per linear foot
treet Trees
uilding Permit Surcnarge
ire Station Mit Fee
Residential
Commercial
.irrent Planning
Residential
Commercial
lvanced Planning
Residential
Commercial
fighting, Landscaping,
Maintenance Dist.
Lre Hydrant
Paint & Blue Dot
gyre
Sprinklers
'ter Meters
3/4"
1"
1-3/4"
250.00 per tree
1% of Total Permit Fee
Min. 51.00. Max. 550.00
577.00 per dwelling unit
0.34 per square feet of building
50.00
0.02
150.00
0.06
per dwelling unit
per square foot of
per dwelling unit
per square foot of
1.00 per linear foot
200.00 minimum up to four
50.00 for each additional
Foe-' area
area
+ .50 per head per dwelling unit
400.00 each
500.00 each
750.00 each
1000.00 eacn
:her Fees:
Eastern Municipal Water District - Treatment Plant
Unified School Districts - School Fees Call 654-2785
San Jacinto Hemet Call 658-2171
Fees Call 766-1822
FROM :MAIL FOXES ETC TO 7146E4BSSE 1995.04-12 ^01 5375 F.02/02
Nielsen Construction Co.
Builder/ Developer
Establishea 1964
April 12, 1995
Brian McNabb
Director of Community Development
201 E. Main Street
San Jacinto, Ca. 92583
Re: Interim Fee Waiver and Payment Policy
Dear Mr. McNabb,
I am the owner of tract 27016. A 19 lot subdivision on
Shaver Street in your City. This project is ready for
recordation subject to posting the bonds.
I was unaware until yesterday that you have waived some
fees making it easier to be more competitive in todaye
market. I have run some figures and now believe that this
is a viable project. It will take me longer than the June
30th deadline to resurrect this project. I certainly hope
the City council wil: allow this program to continue.
Without it I would not be able to compete with nearby pro-
jects that are not in the City.
Thank you for this opportunity to voice my opinion.
Cordially yours,
a.
Ri hard A. Nieise
1305 Lennie Cove Avenue / Glendora, California 91740 / (818) 335-8711
coLDweu.
BANKeR f
WRIGHT REALTY
February 15, ;1,ir5 !'n. G° ! a
610 EAST FLORIDA AVENUE. SUITE A
HEMET CA 92543
BUS. (909( 858-2149
FAX (909(658-0859
I ' ' ram.
FEB 21 1995
City of San Jacinto
201 E. Main Street
San Jacinto, CA 92583
Attn: Brian McNabb
Reference: the extension of city ordinance waiving undergrounding fees
for another year from 6-30-95 to 6-30-96.
We hereby request that this item be brought before the San Jacinto City
Council meeting, hopefully at the next scheduled meeting on April 4, 1995.
Extension of this waiver another year will allow the sale of vacant
property located the the corner of Main Street and Camino Los Banos, also
known as 796 E. Main Street, to be consumated and developed. This would
be a tremendous improvement over the present weed -overgrown vacant lot
and would greatly enhance the downtown area of your city.
Without the extension of this waiver, the w15,750 undergrounding fee will
be prohibitive and the sale will NOT be consumated which will be a great
loss to my clients, Mr. & Mrs. Varner, as well as a great detriment to
your city. The potential buyers, The Unitarian Universalist Fellowship
Church, have indicated it will be impossible for them to obtain a
building permit by the present waiver deadline of July 1, 1995.
I strongly encourage you to give this matter your ernest consideration
in a most timely manner for the sake of all parties concerned.
Thank you for your diligent efforts.
Sincerely yours,
VAL JAC}!(SON
REALTOR ASSOCIATE
An Independently Owned and Operated Member of Coldwell Banker Residential Affiliates, Inc.
S A N
JACINTO
TO: Fellow Members of the City Council
FROM: Jim Oaks
DATE: April 18, 1995
Staff Report
RE: REVISED GROUNDWATER ASSOCIATION
ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
The San Jacinto City Council approved original Articles of Association in 1992 for the
Association. Revised Articles are now being considered for adoption by the various
Association members. A copy of the proposed revised Articles is attached for your
review and information. There are going to be some additional revisions in Article III to
reflect the Soboba Indians' water rights issue.
I will be providing a verbal update at our April 18 meeting. However, I wanted you to
have the opportunity to review the proposed revised Articles.
ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
OF
HEMET-SAN JACINTO GROUNDWATER ASSOCIATION
ARTICLE I
The name of this Association is "HEMET-SAN JACINTO GROUNDWATER ASSOCIATION"
(hereinafter 'Association').
ARTICLE II
Mission Statement
Section 1. The Association serves as the a regional groundwater management entity for portions
of the Hemet -San Jacinto Valley aad Groundwater Basins. The mission of the Association is to
maintain a secure, reliable and reasonably priced supply of high quality water for groundwater
producers in the HemetSan Jacinto Valley Groundwater Basins (hereinafter BASINS). The
Association will implement its mission by developing and applying sound groundwater basin
management concepts.
Section 2. The portions of the BASINS
shall include the Canyon area, the Intake area, and the upper pressure area, of the San Jacinto
Hydrologic Subarea; the Hemet Hydrologic Subarea; and a portion of the Winchester Hydrologic
Subarea. Such also being that portion of the San Jacinto Valley southeasterly of Bridge Street
and north-easterly of one -quarter mile west of California Avenue in the area of Simpson Road,
together with tributary basins, streams, and watersheds. A diagram of the subject area is
attached to these Articles as Attachment 'A'. The subject areas of the Association can be
amended as the Board-ef Difecter-s (hereinafter 'Board) ceoutive; ee may from time to
time prescribe.
ARTICLE III
Purposes
Section 1. To:establish arid;maintain a grmUrrdwater miida.0ment'p n or the BASINS. Te-take
8:1HSJGW.AOA
March 3, 1994
Section 2. To investigate and resolve issues and problems relating to groundwater management,
to formulate and disseminate factual and educational data in connection with the supply of
groundwater, its depletion, its quality and contamination, and its conservation, and methods of
recharge and water quality assurance to provide said BASINS its inhabitants and the pumpers
and users of water there -from, with a dependable supply of water to meet their present and
future needs.
Section 3. To investigate legislative or regulatory measures, federal, state or local, which bear
on, relate to, or control the preservation, improvement or recharge of the Basin's water supply
or supplemental sources of supply and, if advisable, express opinions lin connection therewith.
ya--ndc act
Section 4. To cooperate with its members and other persons, firms, corporations, municipalities,
districts, and other agencies, both public and private, interested in or affected by such problems
and the solution thereof in any and all matters relating thereto.
Section 5. This Association does not contemplate, nor shall its activities result in pecuniary gain
or profit to the members thereof, and it shall have no power to engage in any business for profit.
ARTICLE IV
Membership
Section 1. Regular Members.
Any person, firm, corporation, district, municipality, or other agency, public or private, pumping
or diverting water, from or within the Basin, may be admitted as a Regular Member in this
Association.
Section 2. Associate Members.
B:IHSJGW.ADA 2
March 3. 1994
Any person, firm, corporation, district, municipality, or other agency, public or private, interested
in or affected by the purpose of this Association and who is not qualified as a Regular Member
may be admitted to membership as an Associate Member in this Association.
Section 3. Membership Agreement.
Upon joining this Association, the member shall execute an agreement approving and adopting
these Articles.
ARTICLE V
Board of Directors Executive Committee Members
Section 1. Executive Committee Members
The affairs of this Association shall be conducted and all rights and powers of members shall be
exercised by and through the Board Executive Cornmrttee whose members shall be appointed
annually hereinafter provided. ,
Lake Hemet Municipal Water District, Eastern Municipal Water District, the City of Hemet, and
City of San Jacinto shall
appoint orte 1)
men ber from their respective governing body as a representatt redri the Executhe Committee.
The remaining three (3) members shall be elected by the Re ut; r 1s erribers.to represent the
B:IHSJGW.AOA
March 3, 1994
P H R s • 5 07 ; ;
Suggested Modifications:
Page 4, eliminate paragraph b and insert the following b & c and change c to d:
(b) The Executive Committee shall be empowered to appoint two (2) Executive Committee
members to serve as a Nominating Committee if and when a vacancy arises from the
pumpers at large representation. The Nominating Committee recommendation shall be
presented to the Executive Committee for appointment.
(c) The Executive Committee shall be empowered to appoint three (3) regular members to serve
as a Nominating Committee for annual Executive Committee appointments to represent the
pumpers at large. The Nominating Committee recommendations shall be presented to the
Association at the annual meeting. If there are more than three (3) nominations, the
President of the Association shall call an election to elect three (3) Executive Committee
members to represent the pumpers at large. Nomination(s) from the floor may also be
accepted.
pumpers at large.
(a) At the first meeting of the Executive Committee, the members of the Executive Committee
shall select a President, First Vice -President, Second Vice -President, Secretary, and
Treasurer. The office bearers will serve for one (1) year in their respective position.
The"Executive Committee shall be empowered to select three (3) Executive Comm`sttco
Regular Members to serve as a Nominating Committee if and when a vacancy arises
from the pumpers at large ; representation.. The Nominating Committee
recommendation(s) shall be presented to the Association for consideration. Nominations
from the floor may also be ,accepted:
The President of the'Executive Committee may appoint members of that Committee, to
serve on any committee(s) deemed appropriate by a majority of the Executive Committee
to accomplish the purpose of the association,
Section 2. Voting Rights
(a) Regular Members.
Each Regular Member shall be entitled to one vote.
(b) Associate Members.
B:1HSJGW.AOA
4
Mach 3, 1994
No Associate Member shall have the right to vote or hold office in the Association.
Section 3. Regulations.
The Beard Executive 'c
irrtmittee shall adopt such regulations for its government as it may
deemed necessary.
Section 4. Quorum.
Seven (7) members of the Beard Executive Committee or a majority thereof, whichever is less,
shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of all business.
Section 5. Compensation.
The Director& Executive Committee Members shall not receive any compensation for their
services as such, but, by resolution of the Board Executive Committee, shall be entitled to
......................................................:..
reimbursement for actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of their duties,
and also by authority of the Board Executive Committee, they may be compensated for services
rendered in any other capacity on behalf of the Association.
Section 6. Consultants and Employees.
The Beard ixxes►'e Cortimittee may appoint and employ consultants and employees as may
B:IHSJGW.AOA
5
March J. 1994
be necessary.
The officers, consultants, and employees so selected shall perform such duties and receive such
compensation as the Beard Executive Committee may from time to time prescribe.
Section 7. Powers and Duties of Officers.
Subject at all times to the control and discretion of the Beard ExecutiveCommittee, each officer
shall have and exercise the powers and duties usual to this that office.
Section 8. Meetings.
A meson is of the Association and the Exetx€t€ee Corrrrtittee shall bei"apen and public and
conducted th accordance'' with the Broiwrn ACt, as specified in government Codes Sections
54950 el
Regular meetings of the Beard Ex: cutive';'Cetrttmitee shall be held on the 4-st 3rd Monday of
each month at the-h9W 11- 30 A.M.1 3Ei>PM at the Eastern Municipal Water District Board
Room
shall be hel
other iocations'as othe vlrrs,e determined. Pull Meetings of the Membership
anrival6y, or subject to call at
dates and times set by the Executive C eA Special meetings may be called by the
President or by a majority of the members of the vote of the Beard Executive
Committee
of tho Association. The
B:1HSIGWAOA
6
e and place of special meetings
March 3, 1994
shall be designated by the President, or, if he fails to act, by the Board Executive Committee.
Written notice of each meeting of the Beard Executive Comrnrttee shall be mailed by the
Secretary to each member of the Board E_xecutive Committee at least ten (10) days prior to the
meeting.
Section 9. Puies oi Order.
The procecibre(S) for the oonduct crt any meeting sh0 governed by the latest revised edition
of Robert's Rules of Order. However, such rules are deemed to be procedural only and the
failure to strictly observe such rules shall not affect the jurisdiction or invalidate any action taken
at a meeting that is otherwise held in conform4 with law.
ARTICLE VI
Finances
Section 1. Fiscal year.
The fiscal year of this Association shall be the calendar year.
Section 2. Annual Dues.
The annual dues for Regular and Associate Members shall be $25.00 per year or as determined
EI:VHSJGW.A0A
7
P.44f eh 3, 1994
by thee Executive'Cottee.
Section a. Treasurer.
The Treasurer shalt be responsible for the deposit and withdrawal of Association funds. All
tra
nsactions ansactions must be supported`
... byappropriate ppropriate: documentation and approved by the
Executive 'Committee. If the Executive Cratx ittee appoints a treasurer other than the
representative from Eastern Municipal Water bis#nct, (said f reasureymustbe from one (1) elf the
outer agencies in order to have si pportin agerir y f+na cial systemsi
Section 4. Expulsion of members.
The Beard Executi a Camrnittee shall have power to make rules and regulations relative to the
payment of dues, and may expel any member who fails to pay the same within sixty (60) days
after the due date thereof.
Section 5. Limitation of expenditures.
The Beard ExecxttiVe Committee shall have control of the expenditures of all funds of this
Association, but shall not authorize any expenditure, nor incur any obligation or indebtedness
in excess of the available funds on hand.
Section 6. Annual Audit.
9:5HSIGW.AOA
8
March 3, 1994
There shall be an annual audit of
f the financial record(s) of the Association by a
certified public accountant, as deemed necessary by the Beard
ARTICLE VII
Withdrawal from Membership
Any member may withdraw from this Association by giving written notice thereof to the Secretary.
ARTICLE VIII
These Articles of Association may be amended by the Board t otfxcTtittee at any regular
meeting or at any special meeting called for that purpose by a vote of two-thirds of the
FRembefoirlip Execciu
n attendance at the meeting. Written notice of any proposed
amendment containing the wording thereof, and the time and place of the meeting at which this
amendment will be considered, must be mailed to each Diroctsf
by the Secretary at least thirty 438# twenty` (2C days prior to such meeting.
B:wSJGW.AOA 9
Mrch 3. 1994
r-�
S A N
JACI NTO
A ;:NDA • ►
Staff Report
TO: Honorable Mayp( and Councilmembers
FROM: Pam
DATE: April 18, 1995
RE: CONSIDERATION OF SCAG MEMBERSHIP
aster
As you'll recall, Darren Kettle, of SCAG, made a presentation to the City Council
providing information on SCAG, its duties and responsibilities and how the City of San
Jacinto could be involved. One of the items discussed was the fact that for our
Councilmembers to participate in SCAG committees, the City needed to join SCAG and
pay an annual membership fee.
Through WRCOG, Councilmember Jim Oaks has been asked to serve on the SCAG
Energy and Environment Committee. This committee's purview includes air quality,
energy, and transportation improvements.
For Councilmember Oaks to participate, the City would need to join SCAG. SCAG would
be willing to waive the requirement to join through the rest of the 1994-95 Fiscal Year.
However, the City would need to commit to find a SCAG membership in 1995-96. Due
to a population based membership formula, the membership fee would be $1,255 for
1995-96.
Councilmember Oaks will be discussing this under the Mayor and Councilmembers
section of the agenda, to determine Council interest.
S S