HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 3/7/1995AGENDA
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND
THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
DATE: March 7, 1995 C J '! _
t."4/(7
TIME: 7:30 P.M. 04(
PLACE: COMMUNITY CENTER
625 SOUTH PICO
SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
Roll Call
Prayer of Invocation - Pastor Gordon Houston
Pledge of Allegiance
2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
2.1 Recognition of Dave Ver Plank, Planning Commissioner 1985-1994
2.2 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Presentation -
Darren Kettle
3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any person may address the Council on any subject pertaining to city business not
listed on the agenda, during this portion of the meeting. A limitation of three (3)
minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the Council.
Convene the Redevelopment Agency in joint session with the City Council for
consideration of the following items:
gnU1/ A74,-
V7/046k
MnAA-A-i ( b > `-€J
4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
4.1 Update on the Status of the Three -Lot Brown Street Housing Project -
McNabb
RECOMMENDATION: Receive for information and provide direction to
staff, as appropriate.
5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be
enacted by one motion by the City Council in the form listed.
There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless
members of the City Council, staff or the public requests specified items to be removed
and/or discussed.
Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come forward, upon
invitation of the Mayor, state their name, address and the Consent Calendar item
number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes.
5.1 Minutes - Regular Meeting of February 7. 1995
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes for the Regular Meeting of
February 7, 1995, as presented.
5.2 Minutes - Special Joint Meeting of February 14, 1995
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes for the Special Joint Meeting
of February 14, 1995, as presented.
5.3 Warrant Register
RECOMMENDATION: Approve warrant numbers 39758 through 39866
dated February 28, 1995 in the amount of $237,212.43 and Payroll check
numbers 4705 through 4798 dated February 17, 1995.
5.4 Treasurer's Report - January 1995
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
5.5 Notice of Completion - Bath Reservoir
RECOMMENDATION: Accept the new Bath Reservoir and authorize the
City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion on behalf of the City.
2
5.6 Creation of the Position of Utilities Superintendent in the Public Works
Department and Approval of the Utilities Superintendent Job Description
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the creation of the position of Utilities
Superintendent to replace the present position of Water Superintendent in
the Public Works Department and approve the Utilities Superintendent job
description.
5.7 Approval of Auctioneer for Auction of City Surplus Property
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the selection of Kozma Appraisal and
Auction Service to carry out a public auction of surplus City property.
5.8 Adoption of Ordinance Approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment 3-94
RECOMMENDATION: Waive the reading in full, and read by title only
and adopt (Second Reading) Ordinance No. 1008 approving Zoning
Ordinance Amendment 3-94, thereby amending Ordinance No. 340, the
Zoning Ordinance 340, by Repealing and Re-establishing Article No. 16,
the Sign Guidelines, of the City of San Jacinto.
ORDINANCE NO. 1008
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 3-94, THEREBY
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 340, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY REPEALING
AND RE-ESTABLISHING ARTICLE NO. 16, THE SIGN GUIDELINES, OF THE CITY
OF SAN JACINTO
5.9 Revision to the Down Payment Assistance Program - McNabb
RECOMMENDATION: Acting in the capacity of the Redevelopment
Agency, approve the revisions to the Down Payment Assistance Program,
as outlined in the staff report.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by: Seconded by: to approve consent calendar
items 5.1 through 5.9 adopt Ordinance No. 1008.
Adjourn the Redevelopment Agency and continue acting in the capacity of the City
Council for the remainder of the agenda.
3
6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
6.1 Establishment of North State Street Underground District #1 - (Continued
from 2-21-95) - McNabb
RECOMMENDATION: Close the Public Hearing and adopt Resolution
No. 95- establishing North State Street Underground District #1.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING NORTH STATE STREET UNDERGROUND UTILITY
DISTRICT NO. 1
7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS
7.1 County Services Area (CSA) 152 Administrative Services Contract
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and Resolution
Setting Rates for the County Service Area - Evans/Cox
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Administrative Services Contract
between Riverside County and the City of San Jacinto, which will enable
the County to formally assess and collect City CSA 152 parcel charges
and revenue for the NPDES program; Adopt Resolution No. 95- Setting
the Rates for County Services Area (CSA) 152 to Fund City's National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Program.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA SETTING THE RATES FOR COUNTY SERVICE AREA 152 - SAN
JACINTO TO FUND CITY'S NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION
SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT PROGRAM
7.2 Resolution Setting Public Hearing to Hear Protests and Obections to the
Report and Account After Demolition of the Las Brisas Models - McNabb
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 95- setting hearing for
April 4, 1995 to consider objections and protests to the demolition costs of
the Las Brisas Models.
4
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
SETTING HEARING FOR PROTESTS OF OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND
ACCOUNT AFTER DEMOLITION PURSUANT TO THE UNIFORM CODE FOR
ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS
8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
8.1 Request for reimbursement of $369.00 (airfare) for Bonnie Stone,
President of Citizens for Senior Housing
8.2 Request from San Jacinto Valley Museum Association for City Council to
appoint a Museum Representative
8.3 Recommended Process for Annual Evaluation of the City Manager
8.4 Inland Empire Postmark
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 95- requesting the U.S.
Postal Service to Consider Changing the Area's postmark from San
Bernardino to "Inland Empire"
RESOLUTION NO. 95-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA REQUESTING THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE TO CONSIDER
CHANGING THE AREA'S POSTMARK FROM SAN BERNARDINO TO
"INLAND EMPIRE"
8.5 1995-96 Goals and Objectives Setting Workshop
8.6 Participation in the 1995 Hemet News' Ramona Pageant Edition
9.0 CLOSED SESSION
9.1 Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956 - California Resources Agency vs. City
of San Jacinto
9.2 Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956 - California_ Farm Bureau vs. City of San
Jacinto
5
9.3 Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 - Public Employee
Performance Evaluation (Title: City Manager)
9.4 Public Employee Discipline/Release pursuant to Government Code
Section 54957
10.0 ADJOURNMENT
Motion by: Seconded: Action: to adjourn.
Vote:
I, Bob Wilson, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that I caused to be
posted the foregoing agenda this 2nd day of March, 1995, as required by law.
{3tvu4
ep ty City Clerk (
6
A(i.:.:4DA 41 ,
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: March 21, 1995
SUBJECT: UPDATE ON THE STATUS OF THE THREE -LOT BROWN STREET
HOUSING PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION
1. Informational - Receive and File
2. Comment as Appropriate
BACKGROUND
During the past several weeks Staff has been working with Habitat for Humanity and AA
Chamberlain and Associates on the implementation of our affordable housing program,
and specifically the 3-lot site on Brown Street. The Agency Staff has reached a tentative
agreement with both Habitat and Chamberlain on the terms for the development of the
site. A Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) has been prepared and is being
reviewed by the local Habitat Chapter. It is anticipated that the Board of the local Habitat
Chapter will authorize the execution of the DDA during the week of March 6, 1995. The
DDA is scheduled for City Council consideration on March 21, 1995.
The basic terms of the agreement are that the City will turn the property over to Habitat
and that AA Chamberlain will assist Habitat in the development of the homes. The City
has received a HOME grant in the amount of $150,000 for the construction of the three
homes. The cost of construction of the three homes is estimated at $204.055.00, based
upon a budget prepared by AA Chamberlain. The Redevelopment Agency will provide
the additional $54,055.00 to complete the construction of the three homes, covers all fees,
as well as contractual costs above the grant amount.
The DDA also requires the homes to be sold at "market rate" prices to be sure that the
sales of "Courtyard Classics" are not adversely affected. In order to accomplish this, the
Agency will be taking a second trust deed in the amount between the selling price and
the "market rate" price. The Agency's trust deed will begin to be forgiven after 10 years
and will be totally forgiven after 20 years. If the unit is sold before the 10 year period
elapses, the Agency will be repaid the amount of the second trust deed. If the unit is sold
after 10 years, the Agency will receive a prorated portion of the second trust deed
amount.
City Council Staff Report
March 21, 1995
Page No. 2
Additionally, the DDA includes affordability provisions and covenants which limit the price
of the homes for the life of the Redevelopment Plan. The Redevelopment Plan was
adopted in September of 1983, and had a life of 45 years.
C C RPT-95\3-LOT I N F. C C R
AGLADA 1.
J A N
�JACINTO
Staff Report
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk
Via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: March 7, 1995
RE: Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 7, 1995
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 7,
1995, as presented.
MINUTES
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND
THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY
FEBRUARY 7, 1995
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
The Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 7:35
P.M. by Mayor Hafliger at the Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto,
California.
Present: Councilmembers Leahy, Oaks, Solorio, Williams and Mayor
Hafliger
Absent: None
A moment of silence was observed for reflection
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Hafliger
2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
2.1 5 Year Service Awards - Bonnie Searles
Bonnie Searles was not present.
2.2 Community Spirit Award - Fire Department Christmas Food Drive
Fire Chief Price made presentations as contained in the staff report on file
with the City Clerk. Noted there was not a formal Ladies Auxiliary, but
rather that was also a contribution by the Soboba Springs Mobile Estates.
Accepting for Soboba Springs Mobile Estates, was Bernice Crabtree,
Brian Thomas for State Bros., and Hazel Sundquist for Montage
Neighborhood Watch.
Mayor Hafliger read a letter of commendation from the Community Pantry.
2.3 Recognition of Dave Ver Plank, Planning Commissioner 1985 - 1994
Mr. Ver Plank was not present.
February 7, 1995
2.4 Briefing on Early Times Mid -year Rod Run - Jennifer Venable
Presenter, nor any representative, was present.
3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
At the hour of 7:44 P.M. convened the Redevelopment Agency in joint session with the
City Council for the consideration of the following items:
4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
4.1 Approval of 1993-94 Redevelopment Agency Audited Financial Report
City Manager Easter advised the auditors were present if there were any
questions.
Michael Harrison, Conrad & Associates, made a brief presentation as
contained in the staff report and audit report on file with the City Clerk.
Councilmember Leahy wanted it known that the Education Revenue
Augmentation Fund would be a three year program where the state
acquired local funds. Felt that action should be taken to assure it would
not go on and on.
Mr. Harrison advised the last payment would be 5/10/95, and that
legislation was being watched for any new RDA legislation which would
funnel funds to the state. Stated the funds came as a matter of local
agencies losing general property tax revenue which went to support
schools, and the state had used the funding to balance their budget,
thereby hurting local agencies.
4.2 PUBLIC HEARING - Resolutions Approving Sale of Redevelopment
Agency Land
Community Development Director McNabb made a presentation as
contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk.
Mayor Hafliger opened the public hearing.
2
February 7, 1995
There being no speakers wishing to present testimony, the public hearing
was closed.
Bill Carlson, Fun Properties, outlined the planned facilities and activities.
Commended those involved in the long process. Stated the project would
be a prototype for the future and other cities. Hoped to open the first of
October, and could be no later than mid November.
A MOTION was made by Agency Member Leahy, seconded by Agency
Member Williams, acting in their capacity as the Redevelopment Agency,
to approve the sale of Redevelopment Agency Property and the
Disposition and Development Agreement with Fun Properties, A California
Limited Liability Corporation subject to their obtaining financing and adopt
Resolution No. RDA 95-1 approving the sale of Redevelopment Agency
property with findings; and acting in their capacity as the City Council,
adopt Resolution No. 95-4 for the sale of Redevelopment Agency property
with findings. Motion carried on a 4-0-1 vote with Mayor Hafliger
abstaining due to a possible conflict of interest.
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 95-1
A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE SAN JACINTO
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA PURSUANT TO DISPOSITION AND
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DEVELOPER: FUN PROPERTIES, A CALIFORNIA
LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION)
RESOLUTION NO. 95-4
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
AUTHORIZING THE SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO CONVEY
REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
AREA (DEVELOPER: FUN PROPERTIES, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY
CORPORATION)
5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Oaks, seconded by Councilmember
Leahy, to approve the consent calendar as presented. Motion carried on a 5-0
vote.
February 7, 1995
5.1 Minutes - Regular Meeting of January 17, 1995
Approved the minutes for the Regular Meeting of January 17, 1995, as
presented.
5.2 Warrant Register
Approved warrant numbers 39489 through 39638, dated January 31,
1995 in the amount of $1,290,068.60 and Payroll check numbers 4521
through 4616 dated January 20, 1995.
5.3 Treasurer's Report - December 1994
Received and filed.
5.4 Reduction of Performance Bond, Tract 24052
Location: Treasurers at Rancho San Jacinto, generally east of Arroyo
Viejo and south of Commonwealth Avenue
Reduced bond #35M-775-672-00 for Tract 24052 by $122,338.15 (22
percent), from $563,508.00 to $441,170.35.
5.5 Calling of Street Improvement Bonds, Tract 24713
Location: Annendale Park, North Side of Idyllwild Drive, West of Tiger
Lane
Called the bonds to complete the street cap, fog seal and blue dot
markers.
5.6 First Amendment Office on Aging Contract (County of Riverside)
Approved the First Amendment to the Office on Aging Contract between
the County of Riverside and the City of San Jacinto, to change the term of
the contract to one year, ending June 30, 1995, for the Information and
Service Program, including funding for the remaining six months.
5.7 California Disabled Access Discrimination Complaint Procedure
Adopted Resolution No. 95-5 establishing a disabled access
discrimination complaint procedure for the City, pursuant to California
Government Code Sections 4450, et. sec., and Health and Safety Code
Sections 19955, et. sec.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
ESTABLISHING A COMPLAINT PROCEDURE FOR INVESTIGATION OF DISABLED
ACCESS COMPLAINTS
4
February 7, 1995
5.8 Tax Sale 393 S. Kirby Street - Acquisition of Park Land
Adopted Resolution No. 95-6 objecting to the public sale of tax defaulted
property located at 393 S. Kirby Street, offering to purchase the property
and stating the public purpose for which the property is to be devoted.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO OBJECTING TO PUBLIC SALE
OF CERTAIN TAX DEFAULTED PROPERTY LYING WITHIN THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, OFFERING TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY AND STATING THE
PUBLIC PURPOSE FOR WHICH THE PROPERTY IS TO BE DEVOTED
At the hour of 7:56 P.M. adjourned the Redevelopment Agency and continued acting in
the capacity as the City Council for the remainder of the agenda.
6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS
7.1 Request for Fee Waiver by Chamber of Commerce for Annual Carnival
Senior Planner Hults made a presentation as contained in the staff report
on file with the City Clerk.
Council Comments:
1. Concern regarding the struggle with available funding and the need
to see that such funding directly benefits the intended purpose, i.e.,
supporting local businesses and economic development. Would
prefer to see a set amount budgeted each year, which would be
tied to a specific program of work. Felt it more important to see
funding going to support existing and future development of
business. Did not agree with the residents subsidizing the events.
2. Felt the participants of the events could pay a little extra to cover
the fees charged by the City. Did not see what could be
eliminated, all but business license would involve staff time. Such
a function did not benefit economic development, because it did
not attract from outside the community. Inquired what funding
would be left and needed by remaining events. Staff could not
identify those figures at the time.
5
February 7, 1995
3. Feeling that the precedent had been set, since the City had waived
fees for the prior three years.
4. Felt the benefit was to more than just the participants. The City
needed to provide some direction to the Chamber. Should show
the City was desirous of supporting the Chamber, but not
necessarily every time by a fee waiver.
City Manager Easter advised that some years in the past, the City had
provided a set amount of funding, which was tied to a specific work
program that identified where the funds went. With the budget constraints
of recent years, funding was not available and fee waivers were the
approach. Outlined several approaches that Council could take with
regard to such requests and activities. Advised the Chamber had
submitted a list of activities and estimate of fee waivers anticipated for the
1995/96 year.
Patti Drusky, Chamber of Commerce Executive Director, stated the
Chamber was there to support local businesses and the community as a
whole. Hence some activities were geared to economic development and
some for the community. Advised the Circus had been canceled. Noted
their budget derived 20-25% of their funding from membership dues and
the remaining from fund raising, in order to continue support to
businesses with monthly meetings and mixers. The Chamber was always
looking for more ways to advance and pursue opportunities to serve the
community, businesses and economic development, and would take
Council's points back to the board.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy to waive the $500 for
business license, for the one event only. Motion failed for lack of a
second.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Oaks, seconded by
Councilmember Solario, to allocate funds for the Chamber of Commerce
Carnival in the amount of $800 in the manner of fee waivers. Motion
carried on a 4-1 vote with Councilmember Williams dissenting.
7.2 Approval of the 1993-94 Audited Financial Report
Michael Harrison, Conrad & Associates made a presentation as contained
in the staff report and audit report on file with the City Clerk. Stated that
expenditures were within $5,000 of revenues for the past fiscal year.
6
February 7, 1995
There were some internal control comments and recommendations. That
was a summary of the highlights.
7.3 Highway 79 Update and Authorization to Submit Highway Construction
Grant Applications to RCTC
Public Works Director Evans made a presentation as contained in the
staff report on file with the City Clerk.
At the hour of 8:10 P.M. Mayor Hafliger left the Council chambers.
Mr. Evans advised that discussions had occurred with CALTRANS,
RCTC, and WRCOG, as well as other local agencies. Many ideas had
surfaced on suggestions for the future alignment of Highway 79, and the
issue had, and would continue, to come under great scrutiny. Explained
the various alternatives, suggestions and their pros and cons. Ultimately,
there was a reluctance by CALTRANS to discuss the matter further until
they were confident with the future traffic projections. Explained that
WRCOG was working on a computer generated projection which they
anticipated to be complete in the next few months. Thought the ultimate
decision would be a relocation somewhere in the Sanderson/Warren area.
In addition, there were the concerns, since the state highway would be
further into the future, what would be done in the interim, again that being
part of the overall issue. Pointed out that the master plan of roadways
included proposed river crossings, which may work in hand with an
interim plan. Some plans opposed by CALTRANS, would have included
curves too wide to accommodate in the limited space available. The
interim idea which seemed most acceptable by all parties concerned, was
to cross at Sanderson, probably west on the Ramona Expressway and
then south on Warren into Hemet to Highway 74. For the long term, it
was still vague. In response to Council inquiries, advised it was not likely
they would see the Tri-Centennial Bridge.
Mr. Evans advised there was an MOU with CALTRANS, in which they
would be willing to look at an interim alignment and meetings would begin
in the next few months. Probably in the next 1-3 years staff would be
approaching Council with a proposal to be accepted by CALTRANS, City
of Hemet and San Jacinto, and regional agencies, that would suggest an
interim alignment. As for a more permanent alignment, it would depend
upon the development in the valley, and the traffic projections if they
suggested a tremendous increase in the future. The City would have to
7
February 7, 1995
keep in mind, if developing in the Sanderson/Warren area, to set aside
sufficient right-of-way for the alignment, which should be decided in the
next 1-3 years.
Mr. Evans then advised, as noted in the staff report on file with the City
Clerk, of the projects recommended for application through RCTC for
funding. Planned to include the Ramona Expressway for the missing link,
which barely missed funding previously, the Warren Road rehabilitation,
the Lake Park Bridge and Seventh Street between State and Lyon (raise
the roadway and put culverts underneath). If Council wished any others,
that was needed since the application deadline was March 3, 1995.
Explained the criteria of evaluating applications for selection. In response
to Council, advised that matching funds could come from Measure A or
other local transportation funding.
Clayton Record wanted to remind Council of their land use commitment to
the Annexation 66 property owners, who had the understanding the
alignment would be reserved through the area of the EMWD Reclamation
Plant and right-of-way to buffer development. Thought the interim plan
was reasonable.
City Manager Easter stated that as part of the circulation element, staff
strongly felt there needed to be some sort of point between Sanderson
and Warren, similar to that submitted and endorsed by the Annexation 66
master planning, and there was a commitment to make the link between
Warren and Sanderson.
Mr. Evans, in response to Council, advised that the sweeping curves
considered at Cottonwood were too sharp for the anticipated speeds.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by
Councilmember Oaks, to approve the four items, Ramona Expressway,
Warren Road, Seventh Street and the Lake Park Bridge, and submit to
RCTC (Riverside County Transportation Commission). Motion carried on
a 4-0 vote with Mayor Hafliger absent.
7.4 Review of Proposed Sion Guidelines
City Manager Easter clarified that Mr. Hults had taken over on a project
started by Former Fire Chief Chadwick.
8
February 7, 1995
At the hour of 8:40 P.M. Mayor Hafliger returned to Council chambers.
Associate Planner Hults made a presentation as contained in the staff
report on file with the City Clerk. Advised the matter would come beck for
a public hearing on February 21, 1995. In response to Council, advised
the prohibition of flashing/blinking signs would include Barber Poles.
Mr. Hults outlined the various changes and the justifications. In response
to Council, advised the prohibition on vehicle signs would not include the
magnetic ones on the sides of cars, but was intended to address
competitors parking and placing signs to advertise their product or service
in the public right-of-way. Advised that a time for removal of political signs
had not been determined. It was anticipated staff would bring back to
Council a program on political signs to address sign removal, and it would
not apply to private property. Staff concerned about compliance by locals
and not those from out of the area.
COUNCIL CONSENSUS to include a time frame for removal of political
signs.
8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
8.1 Briefing on January 20, 1995 Ramona Pageant Community Committee
Meeting
Councilmember Oaks advised he had recently attended a committee
meeting. The thrust of the meeting was the lack of local participation,
which had been declining, and presented a chart depicting that status.
Many ideas were generated and did not feel it was necessary, presently
to summarize them all. The pageant management would be looking at all
of the suggestions and come back with some alternatives at a later
meeting. The next meeting would be March 3, 1995.
8.2 Report on Western Riverside Council Of Government (WRCOG)
Conference
Councilmember Leahy advised she had attended the meeting on January
28th, to review issues and address growth of transportation infrastructure.
Stated the next meeting, March 18th, they would focus on a vision
statement, goals and priorities. Advised there was a Comprehensive
Plan, which she would make available for viewing at the City offices.
9
February 7, 1995
Councilmember Leahy and Oaks would be attending the next meeting.
8.3 Discussion of FEMA Funds (Lake Park Drive)
Public Works Director Evans advised that funding had been received from
FEMA from damage two years previously, plans had been prepared and
was ready to advertise for bids. The project was delayed in hopes of
obtaining funding for the bridge. Staff had informal bids of $55,000 and
the question was whether Council desired to add the additional funding,
although there would be no guarantee it would not wash out again, but
suspected with the spillway, it would relieve the problems. Staff would
probably bring a proposal in March or April to proceed with the project. In
response to Council inquiries, advised the funding of $40,000 had been
received and it could be used for the bridge, but was unsure how soon the
bridge would proceed. When staff tried to obtain answers from
Washington or Sacramento, the status was unclear.
City Manager Easter suggested that staff would pursue answers on the
status and report back to Council with a recommendation. Suggested the
City ask the Federal Representative Advocate, on behalf of San Jacinto,
to look into the matter because of the continued mud slides and the
limited access for those living on the other side of the river.
8.4 Consideration of Appointing an Ad Hoc Recvclina Subcommittee
City Manager Easter made a presentation as contained in the staff report
on file with the City Clerk.
Mayor Hafliger, with consensus of Council, appointed he and
Councilmember Oaks to the Ad Hoc Recycling Subcommittee. Staff to set
dates for joint meeting with Hemet.
At the hour of 9:00 P.M. Council recessed.
At the hour of 9:30 P.M. Council reconvened, with all members present, for closed
session pursuant to the following:
9.0 CLOSED SESSION
10
February 7, 1995
9.1 Conference with Real Property negotiator pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.8
Property: Superblock, Area East of San Jacinto St. bounded by
Esplanade & Commonwealth
Negotiating Parties: Cantu, Lin, Carlson, Parker, Gorman, Delgado,
Peterson, Kranz, Urick
Under Negotiation: Price and terms.
9.2 Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9,1 case
At the hour of 9:53 P.M. Council reconvened in open session, with all members
present, and announced no reportable action being taken.
10.0 ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned. The
hour of adjournment being 9:54 P.M.
Submitted by
Bob Wilson, City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
11
Approved
Henry Hafliger, Mayor
. A N
JACINTO
Staff Report
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk
Via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: March 7, 1995
RE: Minutes of Special Joint Meeting of February 14, 1995
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Joint Meeting of February
14, 1995, as presented.
MINUTES
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE
SAN JACINTO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FEBRUARY 14, 1995
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
The Special Joint Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council and the San Jacinto
Unified School District Board of Trustees was called to order at 7:10 P.M. by
Mayor Hafliger and President Webb, at the San Jacinto School District Board
Room, 257 Grand Army, San Jacinto, California.
Present: Councilmembers Leahy, Oaks, Solorio and Mayor Hafliger
Board Members Cornett, Reaser, Schouten, Wickham and
President Webb
Absent: Councilmember Williams
Board Members - None
Pledge of Allegiance was led by President Webb
2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
None
3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS
Lucille Ferguson voiced concerns that the Mistletoe Park Rehabilitation was
more than just removal of dead trees, but also live and vital trees. Concerned
with the demolition of the Mistletoe donation well, which had paid for itself many
times over, and urged Council to consider saving the funds for demolition and
allow the well to remain.
4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
None
5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
None
6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
1
February 14, 1995
7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS
7.1 Update on Joint Park/School Facilities - Joe Enserro/Les Evans
7.1.1 City of San Jacinto/San Jacinto Unified School District Sallee
Park/Monte Vista Campus Community Park Master Plan - Bagley
Public Works Director Evans advised the plan for the Sallee Park/Monte
Vista Middle School was a joint project to enhance the existing area. The
committee consisted of representation from the City, School District and
Valley Wide Recreation staff.
Todd Bagley handed out diagrams of the proposal and made a
presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk.
The proposal addressed concerns with new parking off Tahquitz,
eliminating the existing parking lot, which was a nuisance, added a new
play area, renovated two fields and expanded the other field for use at
every level of baseball and softball. Included six basketball courts and
seven mixed use play courts and the eventual construction of a new rest
room to replace the existing. The plan would provide better access to
fields, more visibility for police patrols and a larger area to serve the
community needs. One option under consideration was the pool removal
and used an overlay to show the increased turf open space which would
be realized. The completed project would provide San Jacinto with a
community park for mixed use and new facilities for the Monte Vista
campus. In response to Council inquiry, advised the tree removal would
be for trees diseased and dead, and was unlike the situation at Mistletoe
Park, where the Elms were more brittle and susceptible. In response to
Board Member, identified the location of the existing Transportation
Maintenance Yard.
Mr. Bagley outlined the following costs for each phase:
Phase One $ 286,000.00
Phase Two $ 208,000.00
Phase Three $ 265,000.00
Phase Four $ 186,000.00
Phase Five $ 251,000.00
Total $1,196.000.00
February 14, 1995
Community Development Director McNabb explained the pool removal
was a consideration because of the Superblock Development which could
provide a more centrally located recreation facility. However, the pool
would not be removed without an alternative location for a water facility
through a public, private or joint venture.
Mr. Bagley, in response to Council and Board inquiries, advised of the
following:
1. Basketball lighting could be coin operated.
2. Ball field lighting would be necessary for league play.
3. Bleachers were identified on the handout and numbered nine, with
the size being 9' x 16', with five rows of seating, which should be
sufficient.
4. There would be individual and group picnic facilities
5. Existing rest rooms would be demolished and replaced. The new
facilities would handle the peak capacity and would be a
bathroom/concession area, with access on both sides.
6. Renovation was needed because fields needed lighting, the
fencing needed to be replaced, the irrigation needed renovation,
and field turf needed to be improved
City Manager Easter clarified for the Board that the Superblock area did
not include the area under discussion, and a variety of vendors
opportunities were being considered, but not for the Sallee Park/Monte
Vista campus site under consideration. The only vendors would be those
for non-profit.
Mr. McNabb clarified that the EMWD fees, if any, would be minimal,
based on the assumption fees had already been paid and the facility
would mostly be grandfathered in.
Mr. Bagley clarified the project would probably take 10-12 years, and
even on a fast track it would take at least six years. Phase one alone,
couldn't begin for ten months. Each phase provided something for
everybody, and phase one would address the biggest factor, which was
the parking. Because of the overall cost, it was important to at least take
a first step toward making improvements, which could be done more
successfully through phasing.
February 14, 1995
Ms. Easter stated the cost was a realistic issue, which was why the plan
was phased. The intent would be to find all available sources of funding
and resources. An example was the possible use of Valley Wide
Recreation CDF workers to defray labor costs. Also the availability of
Park Development funds, funds which were restricted to park use only.
Superintendent Marshall clarified the RDA funds were those which would
normally go to the State, but due to the RDA, were captured for local use.
However, due to a miscalculation, funding owed the District could be used
in the form of credits for some of the proposed work.
Mr. Evans requested, if desirable of Council and the Board, to authorize
staff to have attorneys draft the appropriate agreements to proceed and
for staff to prepare RFP (request for proposals) for approval
simultaneously with the agreement.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by
Councilmember Solorio, to approve the joint Sallee Park/Monte Vista
Campus Community Park Master Plan and authorize staff to solicit
proposals for the design of Phase One of the project. Motion carried on a
4-0 vote with Councilmember Williams absent.
A MOTION was made by Board Member Reaser, seconded by Board
Member Cornett, to approve the joint Sallee Park/Monte Vista Campus
Community Park Master Plan and authorize staff to solicit proposals for
the design of Phase One of the project. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote.
It was clarified that the agreement would need to be flexible to allow for
changes, by future officials, during the course of the project, but also
needed an assurance of the commitment to the project for the good of the
community.
7.1.2 De Anza/Mt. View - Bagley
Public Works Director Evans stated the available property would
not be sufficient for the needs. Until such time as there was a
viable project to bring forward the matter would remain on hold.
7.2 Proposed Joint Use of City Maintenance Facilities - Joe Enserro/Les
Evans
4
February 14, 1995
Public Works Director Evans explained the proposal was an innovative
and cost effective program for both entities. Made a presentation as
contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. Outlined the details
of the proposal as contained in the report. Inquired if the proposal was
something Council and the Board were interested in and desirous of staff
proceeding to formalize the numbers?
Mr. Evans, in response to inquiries from Council and the Board, stated the
fuel capabilities of the yard were old and inadequate to meet needs. The
existing tanks would have to be removed by the end of 1995. The
proposal would be to contract with outside service for fuel. Advised the
District had above ground diesel tanks, and if they wanted to use them it
would be their option. With regard to the handling of hazardous waste,
stated that the yard could work that into a sharing arrangement, but would
have to fence off additional area to accommodate it.
Superintendent Marshall, in response to a Board inquiry regarding the
maintenance staff, advised it would be a trade off worked into the lease
arrangement and not just the District picking up addition work.
Mr. Evans, in response to a Board inquiry what if police vehicles were no
longer leased, stated any agreement would have a termination and could
be changed each year, the same if the District desired to make
improvements to the property and then moved out. All such issues would
have to be addressed in the agreement.
Mr. Marshall, in responding to Board concern with the loss of existing
facilities and a determination after that, if the arrangement did not work,
stated the agreement would have to provide certain protections for 1-2
years, and all the specifics would have to be addressed in the agreement.
Joe Enserro, School District Staff, stated the discussions were regarding
routine maintenance and anything else would be on a contract basis, with
guidelines on what could be done.
Mr. Evans advised that staff wanted to begin preparing an agreement for
consideration, if Council and the Board agreed with the concept, and
would authorize their staff to work with the attorneys to bring back an
agreement to both entities for approval.
February 14, 1995
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Oaks, seconded by
Councilmember Leahy, to approve the concept of a joint City/School
District Maintenance Facility at the City's Corporation Yard, under an
agreement based on an exchange of fleet maintenance services from the
District for space rental from the City and authorize staff to negotiate an
appropriate agreement. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Councilmember
Williams absent.
Council concern that a matter for consideration would be the cost of
school improvements and the amount of time required for the costs to be
recovered. Future consideration of the issues would not be beneficial to
either party, without such information.
A MOTION was made by Board Member Cornett, seconded by Board
Member Reaser, to approve the concept of a joint City/School District
Maintenance Facility at the City's Corporation Yard, under an agreement
based on an exchange of fleet maintenance services from the District for
space rental from the City and authorize staff to negotiate an appropriate
agreement. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote.
Board Member concern involved the cost of tank removal and the effect
on them and the fact that the Superfund did not apply to petroleum. It
was a two edge sword, and it should be remembered when fuel could not
be obtained unless they had their own local source of supply.
It was suggested that staff resolve such issues outside of the joint
meeting.
7.3 Joint Administrative Facilities - Easter/Marshall
City Manager Easter reminded those who could remember of the offer in
1991, by Steve Peacock, for a joint City/School facility in Rancho San
Jacinto, which did not come to fruition. However, it was determined there
were advantages to be derived by both agencies by sharing a board
room, employee facilities, and conference rooms. It was time for the next
step and determine the costs. During talks with the College they found
facilities available on campus, which if not torn down, would penalize the
college, if they were not utilized. There were still many issues to discuss.
Areas to be discussed were the timing of availability, structural integrity,
cost and how to handle parking. Staff wanted to know from Council and
the Board, if they wished staff to continue discussing opportunities and
6
February 14, 1995
bring back more specifics to see if the idea would be feasible. In
response to Council and Board inquiries, advised that staff had no further
specifics on the previous, nor any new, offer from Peacock. Staff was
aware of the need for each agency to maintain their own identity.
Identified the buildings under consideration included the old music
building, health services building, part of the print shop area. Staff would
take into consideration the issue of maintenance costs and reaffirmed this
would be something that both agencies would need to go into with their
eyes open.
COUNCIL AND BOARD CONSENSUS for staff to move forward and
investigate the possibilities.
7.4 Miscellaneous Joint Facilities/Projects
7.4.1 Records Storage/Retrieval - Marshall
Superintendent Marshall explained the concept and handed out
information on Writable CD Technology. Stated the minimal costs,
utilizing existing equipment (Personal Computer, 486 with 8 megabytes
and Windows software), would be acquisition of CD ROM hardware
($5,750), a scanner ($2-5,000) and a PC Reader ($4-20,000). Felt that
an adequate system could be acquired for $20,000. One CD could hold
the equivalent of 550 floppy disks. Documents could be input at 375
pages per hour. Initially the process would be labor intensive and a
sharing arrangement could be made to accommodate both agencies.
Once all documents were input, that basic need would be for a reader to
use the technology effectively.
Deputy City Clerk, in response to Council inquiry regarding laws on how
long records were to be retained, advised that Council had an adopted
records retention schedule. Further, some documents, i.e., minutes,
ordinances and resolution, required permanent retention.
City Manager Easter suggested that the Deputy City Clerks could work
with a committee on the issue.
COUNCIL AND BOARD CONSENSUS for staff to work on coming up
with more facts on the matter.
7
February 14, 1995
Suggested that perhaps other agencies would be interested, i.e., the
Chamber of Commerce.
7.4.2 City/Council/School Library - Easter/Marshall
Superintendent Marshall presented the concept of a multi use library
facility on the High School campus. Staff had met with County library
personnel and County Supervisor Ceniceros. They had been made
aware of the County's budget concerns and the uncertainty of future
funding. Staff was considering a facility at Tiger Lane and IdylIwild, which
would meet the needs of seniors, pre-school, and their student population,
with 10,000 square feet, including the technology of CD Rom and Internet
access. If the County were to join their effort, they
would require separate space. Felt the logistics could be worked out.
The cost, at 90 cents per square foot, it was estimated it would cost
approximately $1.5 million. Staff desired direction from Council and the
Board on whether to continue looking at the matter or was it a dead
issue?
City Manager Easter explained the source of County Library funding, the
portion obtained from local citizens and the decreasing funding from the
State. Stated the County preferred to continue leasing existing facilities
with the lack of funds for expansion. Overall, their responses were wishy
washy regarding relocating. That was the feeling from both the library
administration and the Board of Supervisor representative. They also had
concerns regarding whether their clientele, perceived as seniors, would
go on a school campus to use the facilities. Staff felt it would be important
to include the Friends of the Library and to get a better sense from the
local community. Felt there were some great opportunities but sensed
great reluctance by the County. In response to Council and the Board,
acknowledged the reduction of operating hours by the County at the
existing facility. Noted the other agencies which had entered into joint
arrangements, which were considered to be models for such a facility.
Staff would research the joint effort of Coachella, and the support
received for it. Suggestion was made that the City could consider pulling
out of the County Library system and maintain their own, such as the City
of Hemet. Staff acknowledged the controversy of whether local
communities were getting back what they put into the system, and the
concerns that the City of Riverside derived the greater benefit.
February 14, 1995
Mr. Marshall advised that approximately $221,000 of local funds
supported the local library, and the possible increased services that could
be accomplished with that kind of funding, since much of it was for
administrative services.
Council suggestions; staff contact the entire Board of Supervisors, not just
the local representative, who had indicated they were very city oriented
and willing to give back control to cities on some issues. Also get the
community interested and help jar the County loose.
Board suggestion, although not to be undertaken without public support,
would be to establish a special assessment district such as one done in
San Diego, and establish a special district based on the school district
boundaries. Noted the Hemet Library was using grant funds, and
because of the matching fund requirement, refused funding from that
source.
COUNCIL AND BOARD CONSENSUS that staff contact the Friends of
the Library, contact the County Board of Supervisors for support, and
report back to the Council and Board.
7.5 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Community Outreach
Program - Holmes/Marshall
Police Chief Holmes made a presentation as contained in the staff report
on file with the City Clerk. The proposal would accommodate the School
Attendance Assurance personnel, DARE officer and to handout
educational materials. DARE training would begin February 20th, in Los
Angeles. In response to Council and Board inquiries, advised the
application for funding had been made and funding would not be available
until fall. Staff would speed the process as much as possible, but as a
matter of history, it would be fall or winter before funding would be
received. Funding would be for one year only.
City Manager Easter advised that City received CDBG funding annually.
In response to Council inquiry, advised the funding came from HUD. Staff
could look at alternate funding prior to the receipt of CDBG funds in order
to begin with the new school year.
9
February 14, 1995
Superintendent Marshall advised that the official school year actually
would begin July 1.
Ms. Easter advised no action was required, the matter was informational.
Council had approved funding previously. Staff would periodically make
progress reports to the Council and Board. Staff would be monitoring and
looking for ways to upgrade the program and provide good services to the
community. In response to Board inquiry, advised that all city personnel
kept an eye out for grants, but the City did not have one individual for that
purpose.
7.6 School Development Fees - McNabb/Marshall
Community Development Director McNabb described the city philosophy
on development as pro growth, but not the type that just says growth at
any cost. Hopefully they would avoid the problems observed in other
communities and uphold the high quality of life, which required adequate
parks and school facilities. Both agencies took an aggressive step with
the cooperation agreement to set the funding mechanism for most school
facilities projected over the build out of the City and much of the district.
Development had three aspects; housing, commercial and industrial. The
City philosophy was reflected in the 2010 committee mission statement
which was a balance to provide jobs and services with housing. There
had been a desire to provide shopping closer to the community and a tax
base. In order to attract business, the City needed adequate population
counts, and the businesses and jobs would follow. In spite of City efforts,
the recession had slowed the economic development process. In order to
stimulate growth the City instituted fee deferrals and waivers and
suggested developers make the same request of other agencies. The
efforts stimulated some speculation. A discussion with EMWD and an
initial indication of interest to reduce fees, did not occur, based on the
pending recommendations of a consultant for EMWD. Staff was
suggesting short term relief for development and proposed no changes in
the cooperative agreement. In response to Council and Board inquiries,
advised the overall fee structure was $15-18,000 per single family
dwelling units. Advised that EMWD had offered fee deferral, which was
utilized only by Burger King. The EMWD consultant study had been bid,
but not yet awarded. Advised the Redevelopment amendment area
litigation was not settled, but hoped to do so in the near future.
10
February 14, 1995
School Board Members indicated the schools only took 28 cents per
square foot for commercial, and that commercial provided sales tax
revenue to the City, not the schools.
Superintendent Marshall clarified that the schools were obligated to
collect fees for the shortage of classrooms, and whether they collected or
not, would have to pay the state. With regard to deferrals, noted the
difficulty of collecting once units were sold, and at the very minimum, the
fees would have to be part of the escrow. Noted that the fees also paid
for portable classrooms, and at $66,000 per year, those payments would
have to be paid from the general fund if the fees were not collected.
Noted for the current year, only $125,000 had been collected and the pay
outs would exceed $300,000, and they were hoping to have enough
collected before July.
Council, Board and staff discussed the various pros and cons and the
impacts of Proposition 172 and senior designations on housing.
COUNCIL AND BOARD CONSENSUS for staff to continue to explore
options for all agencies to waive, reduce, and defer development costs.
At the hour of 8:55 P.M. adjourned the Joint Meeting with the San Jacinto Unified
School District Board of Trustees, and continued acting in their capacity as the City
Council for the remainder of the agenda.
7.7 Mistletoe Park Donation Well - Evans
Public Works Director Evans advised staff had obtained bids to demolish
the well, rather than upgrade, and requested re -affirmation by Council,
and approval of the change order.
Mayor Hafliger clarified the concern by Council, in deciding to demolish
the fountain, was that of a misconception that somehow the water at that
fountain possessed some special quality, which was misleading, and
might even lead someone in need of purified water to use the fountain
water instead.
Councilman Oaks agreed, and felt it was pointless to spend $12,000 for
nothing more than a water fountain. To keep the fountain would be
perpetuating a deception.
11
February 14, 1995
Councilwoman Leahy was concerned that almost $5,000 was being spent
to tear the fountain down. Supported that it be maintained as having
historical significance. At the very least, supported some marker at the
site.
Lucille Ferguson noted the well had always been there and was never
special water, just San Jacinto water which did not run through the main
lines of the City, unless that had changed. It had always served the
needs of the people and more than paid its way and supported other
things in the park over the years. Suggested that volunteers could do the
necessary rock work to maintain the well, which would save money and
the well.
Mr. Evans, in response to Council inquiry, advised the contractor was
ready to begin demolition the following morning. The water derived from
the fountain was the same as that received from the taps at home. Noted
that additional work at the site was dependent upon the fountain removal.
To delay, in an effort to seek volunteer work to maintain the fountain,
would delay the entire rehabilitation project.
Todd Bagley noted that the fountain structure needed to be removed to
allow for grading and concrete work. If Council wished to keep the
fountain, a decision would have to be made and another solution
determined to proceed with the project.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Oaks, seconded by
Councilmember Solorio, to approve a change order to the Mistletoe Park
Renovation Project for the demolition of the Donation Fountain. Motion
carried on a 3-1 vote with Councilmember Leahy dissenting and
Councilmember Williams absent.
Councilmember Leahy suggested the matter be identified as the Donation
"Fountain" and not 'Well" to avoid confusion.
8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
At the hour of 9:10 P.M. Council convened in closed session, with all members present
except Councilmember Williams, pursuant to the following:
12
February 14, 1995
9.0 CLOSED SESSION
9.1 Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956 - California Resources Agency vs. City
of San Jacinto
9.2 Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956 - California Farm Bureau vs. City of San
Jacinto
At the hour of 9:31 P.M. Council convened in open session with all members present,
except Councilmember Williams, and announced no reportable action being taken.
10.0 ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to conduct.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember
Solorio, to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously.
The hour of adjournment being 9:32 P.M.
Approved by
Henry Hafliger, Mayor
Submitted by
Bob Wilson, City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
C
A'DA 6 .3
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM Anna A. Vega, Finance Director
Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of Register of Audited Demands
and Payroll Checks
DATE: March 07, 1995
RECOMMENDATION
Approve warrant numbers 39758 through 39866 dated Febuary 28, 1995 in the amount of
$237,212.43 and Payroll check numbers 4705 through 4798 dated February 17, 1995.
SUMMARY
A listing of accounts payable warrants is attached for your review and approval.
Payroll information is available for your review in the Finance Department.
I
REPARED 03/01/1995. 10:54:01
RI:IORAM: 0M3131:
I3ROUF' NUMBER
ACCOUNTING PERIOII:
SROUP USER ANNE
00215 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
OFl/1995
. • NS t TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER
UFFCR I I' I I ON .I DESCRIPTION 2
100 02/21/1995 003714
;nNI.. T11PTn(. SERVICES
200 02/21/1995 003715
FnISENII'"at CARDS
300 02/21/1995 C)03716
MEMBER';il I.P
400 02/21/1995 003717
tow I.1NT I a 100
500 02/21/1995 00371E
':3ASOLINE: -CITY VEHICLES
600 02/21/1995 003719
,OI,. TIJI'' CIIA VEHICLES
700 02/21/1995 003720
an[ll:) MAINTENANCE:
800 02/21/1995 003721.
W,TI TO I A I NI ENANCE
900 02/21/1995 003722
':nrlTI) MA I.NI IENANCE
1000 02/21/1995 00372:3
'ADrn MAINTENANCE
1100 02/21/1995 003724
' FOMFg1P':E WATER/TRASH
1200 02/21/1995 003725
I;FLMDUISI WAIEL</IRASH
1300 02/21/1995 003726
REIMBURSE WAFER/TRASH
1400 02/21/1995 003727
' TI•:F I'1111LNELR IPi.Sr
_ 1500 02/21/1995 003720
111 IIFFTe I111 1"' FRV I:I.:E:S
00 010-7400-425.34-05
FEBRUARY 1995
00 010-3100-431.21-10
'O1..ICE DEPARTMENT
00 010-1410-414.31-20
KEN L..EAHY & ANNA VEGA
00 019-3100-431.21--72
;(]LICE DEPARTMENT
00 019-1200-412.21-70
00 019-3100-431.21-70
00 010-3100-431.34-05
r"OLICE DEPARTMENT
00 010-1700-417.34-05
i'I...ANNING DEPARTMENT
00 010-3300-431.33-30
L'IUII...DING DEPARTMENT
00 050-9000-450.34-05
WATER DEPARTMENT
00 065-0000-229.08-67
DEPOSIT
00 065-0000-229.08-67
DEPOSIT
00 065-0000-229.08-67
DEPOSIT
00 010-1.210-412.30-••90
00 010-3100-431.21--10
City of San Jacinto
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 21
PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECKt CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
_. 0000935 LOUIS ARROYO STMI.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000952 ARROW PRINTING 35070
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001291 CA. MUNICIPAL TREASURER'S STMT.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000218 CASTELLANO'S TOWING SERV. 19931.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000226 CHEVRON. U.S.A. STMI.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000226 CHEVRON. U.S.A. SIM'r.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
000023E COM SER CO.
01-MA295013
02/2S/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 1J
0000238 COM SER CO. 01--MA295004
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000230 COM SER CO. 01--MA295004
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000238 COM SER CO. 01MA295030
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001768 RICHARD CASTILLO
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001769 TERRI POTTS
02/2S/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001770 VICKI LAF'AJ
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
REQ
N
RELI
N
REQ
N
0000246 COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL SER 1.031.
02/2S/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000275 DE BROS BLUEPRINTING SERV 161.:1.3
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
PAGE 1
AMOl INT
625 .00
67.88
75.00
40.00
52.15
215.16
436.00
43.05
4.4.05
0.05
_'1.86
17.05
226.60
9.05
Rli_P'ARE.D 03/01 1995. 1.0154103
ROWAN! 0113130
GROUP NUMBER
ACCOUNTING F'ERIODI
GROUP USER ANNE
00215 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
08/1995
'T'RANS4 TRANS DALE VOUCHER Bl. ACCOUNT NUMBER
WSUFr i r i r1JN 1 DE..SCRIPTION 2
1600 02/21/1995 003729
DI I1EPPINI1NG SERV11 E:f-
1.700 02/21/1995 003730
DI 1 IE I RIMING II 11.NG SE RV I ('E1..
1800 02/21/1995 003731
D1._UEPRINI ING SERV I.CE:1+
1900 02/21/1.995 003732
UIrICr' I IASE:- 3:12 F. MAIN
2000 02/21/1.995 003733
,.....:.,,41R 1 REPORTER FOR
2100 02/21./1995 003734
T ri E:t$ -1 ull...I CE DEPARTMENT
2200 02/21/1995
PHONE Dli!:RVICEE
2300 02/21/1995
PHONE I;r: l:V T('E'
00 010-4:L00-410.30-90
00 039-4155-410.40-'01.
00 096-9700-470.21-10
00 010-2500-425.34-05
MARCH 1995
00 010-0000-310.07-96
DISCIPLINARY HEARINGS
00 019-3100-431•21-74
00:3735 00 010-3100-431.35-16
003736 00 02 5-7256-410.35-16
240' 02/21/1990 00:37:37
INLAND I: PIN TRE. MANAUE Rr
2500 02/21/1995
RriuNT1 (II DUSI:NF.!:',
2600 02/21/1995
r'HITI CI PROCESSING
2700 02/21/199S
-WI 111E1
2000 02/21/1995
LIIESra I.. !ma.
2900 02/21./ 199S
FUE:1.
.3000 02/21/1995
I rASr , r.I II+Cr1As:I:
00 010-1200-412.31-20
ASSOCIATION DUES
0037313 00 010-0000-301.01-60
LICENSE FEE
003739 00 010-3100-431.21-85
POLICE DEPARTMENT
003740 00 021-4150-410.33-30
.UPLIC WORKS
003741 00 019-3200-431.21-70
F IRE DEPARTMENT
003742 00 019-9000-450.21-70
WATER DEPARTMENT
003743 00 010-3100-431.34-05
DISPATCH CONSOLES
City of Sen clnto 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 21
PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECK* CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
0000275 DE BROS BLUEPRINTING SERV 161.50
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000275 DE BROS BLUEPRINTING SERV 16147
02/29/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000275 DE BROS BLUEPRINTING SERV 16109
02/2S/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000296 DIVINE REAL ESTATES F:EG
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 IJ
0001773 KATHY R. DROLL 94-'0929
02/2S/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001765 EXPRESS TIRE 309
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. SIMT
02/2S/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. S1 MT
02/29/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 II
0001466 IEMA SIMI
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001771 KENNETH KLEY Rr:u
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 IJ
_ -. 0000696 LONGS DRUG STORE 073--91218
02/2S/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001122 MIDWAY TEXACO 1271
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001122 MIDWAY TEXACO 15711
02/2B/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001122 MIDWAY TEXACO 128.1.
02/29/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 1'I
7024 0001054 MOTOROLA CREDIT CORP. 20050435
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
AMOUNT
1.94
3.23
5.39
1.1.50.92
1.565.00
135.35
193.75
40.43
20.00
60.00
32.13
64.04
239.09
45.41
1..453.42
i' REF'AF<ELI 03/01 / 1995 . 10154101
PROGRAM! 1413130
13ROUP NUMBER
ACCOUNTING PERIODS
OROIJF' USER ANNE
00215 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
08/1995
City of San Jacinto PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 21
IN13 TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE_ NUMBER
.. SCI'tIPITON .I DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
3100 02/21/1995 003744
LEASE/PURCHASE
3200 02/21/1995 003745
INEPT AI I I'HI:INF: LINES
3300 02/21/1995 003746
C'ERE/I HANCE WORKSHOP
3400 02/21/1995 003747
�'LII�A1'f I: ';ERVICES
3500 02/21/1995 003748
OTIL.JILE'S
3600 02/21/1995 003749
3700 02/21/1995 003750
MIL II. THIS
3E300 (12/21./1995 003 751
':;FPAPAT ENO 7S aII.II FINE/ III`
3900 02/21/1995 003752
3FF'AI;r4TT. 14I) . SlUt EINO OF
4000 02/21/1995 003753
ANII';FA I". MA.IN'I ENANCF
4100 02/21/1995 003754
I ANII'u:AF'F MAINTENANCE
4200 02/21/1.995 003755
N TMII' III�AWS
4300 02/21/1995 003756
I'ULII..I CAI TON CODE: UPDATES
4400 02/21/1995 003772
ITFI..:AII II:•F L)ISI"I..AY RACK
4500 02/21/1995 003773
I,NDOI IP 11- [TER POARt'
00 010-3100-431.34-05
IIISF'ATCH CONSOLES
00 010-3100-431.35-16
POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 010-3100-431.31-25
')EARLES-POST REIMBURSAIIL.E
00 010-6100-425.34-05
JAN. FEB. & MARCH 1995
00 025-7254-410.35-14
00 025-1260-410.35-14
00 025-7260-410.35-14
00 055-4170-450.30--90
WATER/TRASH PILLING
00 050-9000-450.30-90
WATER/TRASH BILLING
00 025-7100-410.34-05
IIOFMANN PARK
00 025-7100-410.34-05
IHOFMANN PARK
00 010-3100-431.30--90
POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 010-3100-431.21
POLICE DEPARTMENT
7024 0001054 MOTOROLA CREDIT CORP.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
20050436
N
0001755 NORTEL COMMUNICATIONS SYS 0267647
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001049 PMW ASSOCIATES
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
1.749
0000910 SAN JACINTO MUSEUM ASSOC. RED
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
_. 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000350 VALLEY RESOURCE
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000350 VALLEY RESOURCE
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000350 VALLEY RESOURCE
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000350 VALLEY RESOURCE
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000317 WESTERN NURSE SPEC.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
1.5 __ 0000324 WEST PUBLISHING CO.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
00 062-3100-431.40-01
POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 062-3100-431.40-01
POLICE DEPARTMENT
0001774 ADIRONDACK
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001774 ADIRONDACK
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
491.0,4911
N
4910,4911
N
4946
I•!
4945
N
STMT.
I.1
STMT.
N
400300
N
400';60
N
AMOUNT
76:.` . 58
3,59 2.01
217.00
1,475.00
--- 24.64 _
2,60.1..55
1A7.72
70.57
911.57
A6.00
270.00
100.00
:I.24.99
A62.10
103.00
RPr ART::D 03/01/ 1.995. 1.0:54 : 0.1
RI IORAM : 0031.3U
CROP NUMBER
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
GROUP 1IST'•R ANNE.
City of Sa,i Jacinto
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 21.
00215 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
00/1995
'TRANS:• 1RANS DATE: VOUCHER BF. ACCOUNT NUMBER
IiF"51:1%I1I LON :L DESCRIPTION 2
1600 02/21/ L995
SAND DA00
003774 00 039--4155-410.40-01
4 700 02/ 21 /'L 94 5 003775
I'III APO I P
41300 02/21./1995 003776
1.OI Al-OII' FILM
1900 02/21/1995 003777
. IA1J1 1111 ' I hl Kl.)C'1'I
5000 02/21/ 199S 0037713
0.1110R161 SUPPLIES
-,100 02/21/1995
5200 02/21/1995
DEFT(•(:. SUPF1...:I:ESi
5300 02/21/19''S
00:3779
003780
003781
5400 02/21/1995 003782
IAN1: 1I11' 101.. SIJT•F•L '.I ES
5500 02/21/19`=5 0037133
C11AI1I IN IDOClkt.
5600 02/21/19'75 003784
Crltit I I 111•: PAPER
5700 02/21/1995 003705
I <V:I.r:I AMOS I"•:I'11'hJE TOOL.
SO00 02/23/1995 0031308
orFiFF SUPPLIES
IES
5900 02/23/1995 003809
LANDSCAPE E rN+CI I I. I F I OWL
4.000 02/23/1995 003010
I AN Tr';I'AI'F AR(I I I F C l ilt:(.
00 010-3100-431.21--90
POLICE 1IE:PARTMIE:N7
00 010-3210-431.21-10
FIRE DEPARTMENT
00 010--4.150-410.33-10
I•(JFI...IC WORKS
00 025-7100-410.33--10
(-'ARKS DEPARTMENT
00 010-3100-431.21-10
POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 010-3100-431.21-1.0
POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 010--3100-431.221--10
POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 010-3100-431.21--30
I"OI_.ICE DEPARTMENT
00 010-3100-431.36-10
I-•(31... I CE. DEPARTMENT
00 010-2500-425.21-10
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
00 010-3200-431.33-10
I IRE DE.C"F,RTMCNI
00 010-3100-431.21-85
POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 028-7100-41.0.40-'•01.
E<F.CVJCL•HISII_ETOE C'AF:F.
00 028•-7100-410.40-01.
SERVICE--13AL.LCE PARE
PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVI:IICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECK- CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
0001199 ARIZON BAG
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001775 LONGS DRUGS --WEST
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000696 LONGS DRUG STORE
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
5133207
N
183-I1.1462
N
73--9:1.225
N
0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY :I82444
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
1J
0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 102444
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000083 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 102259
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
IJ
0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY :F12 0111
02/2S/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 1.82604
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 II
0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 100119
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SI.IPFLY 56557
02/2B/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000420 STAPLES
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001031 SILVER BULLET
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
A121673001
N
5654
N
0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 182025
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
6853 0000925 TODD BAGLEY LANDSCAPE
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
6853 0000925 TODD BAGLEY LANDSCAPE
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
9'.:; 007
IJ
9:... 000
IJ
4
AMOUNT
2.500.00
1,5r'1.53
430.78
610.11
200.00
19.85
137.43
411.35-
1. R0"S.08
00.76
211.16
.0.83
117.00
R :1.00
F'REF'ARI'':U 03/01/1995. 10154:01.
F'R1:;!)RAM1 CM31311
i9ROI.IF' NUMBER 1 00215 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNTING FERIOD! 08/1.995
;.ROLIP I I!;I" F: ANNE
City of San Jacinto PATE 5
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE_ LIST REPORT NUMBER 21
ANS: IRANS DAIS: VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER F'ROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
;CC.II i ION .;. DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK. CHECK DATE TYPE LAST tRANS
GROUP TOTALS
COUNTS 60
AMOUNT! 25.866.26
AMOUNT
'REPAREi:o 03/1995. 10154:01. City of Sa-+.=Jacinto
='ROORAMI 0M;31.3U ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST
OROLIFNUMBER 00217 PREF'AIIIS
- ACCCIUNTINO PERIOD: 08/1.995
(;ROT IF I.I'11 R ANNE
1RANS: TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER
TIF SC:RII-I ION 1 DESCRIPTION 2
10(1 02/21/1995 003757
NF.T ! ii I :' lL.l-
200 02/21/1995 003758
a.:I.1tiI) I:br:I.IRANCF':.-.MAX PERRY
300 02/21/1995 003759
IIF:(V .III INSURANCE. PREMIUM
400 02/21/1995 003760
' II"AI.. I I I INSURANCE : PREMIUM
500 02/21/1995 003761
M. HI I N1ii1.11 ANCF:: PREMIUM
600 02/21/1995 003762
PREMIUM
700 02/21./1995 003763
DEFERRED COMP DEDUCTIONS
900 02/21/1995 003764
,d''FTCF'P:E,) COOP UF:1,111:1.101J5
00
00
00
00
Ot)
00
00
00
900 02/21./1995 003765 00
F-01.T III -I I. ON DEDUCTIONS
1.000 02/27./1.995 003766 00
.)rIU)I IN1 II'li TECHNICIAN
1100 02/21/1995 003767 00
AF I.. AC I NOI.IRANCE F•REMTLIM
'1.6100 02/21/1995 003768
FMI I . Idr) I r:R/ 1 RA!;FI
1300 02/21/1995 003769
(EN FAT.. FARE PREMIUM
1 400 02/21/1995 003770
01'9•I1r7J l .111` 11:E11III11
150 . 012/21./1995 003771
Dr1H nl I oRE" F'F:r.11111M
095--0000-202.21-30
06 5--0000•-201 .08--64
095-0000-202.21-39
0 05--0000- 202.21-39
0 85 •-0000-202. 21-39
00-0000-202.21-35
095-0000-202.21-29
095 - 0000-.202.21 -29
OH 5-0000-202.21•-41
01.0--1. 400-414.34-05
085 ----00 00- 20 2.21- 2 7
(>0 065-0000-310.07-95
OVERPAYMENT
00 085--0000-202.21-31
00 005-0000-'202.21-32
00 065-0000-201.0B- 64
i:OFiRA-4MAX PERRY
PROJ P.O. VENIIOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHF_CKf CHECK DATE FYF'E LAST TRANS
0000235 CITY OF SAN JACINTO
00/00/0000 0039758 02/16/1995
0000969 AETNA HEALTH PLANS OF
00/00/0000 0039759 02/21./1995
0000969 AETNA HEALTH PLANS OF
00/00/0000 0039759 02/21/1995
0000149 HEALTH NET
00/00/0000 0039761. 02/21/1995
00009138 BLUE CROSS OF CA.
00/00/0000 0039762 02/21/1995
0000472 EYE CARE OF AMERICA
00/00/0000 0039763 02/21/1995
0000607 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
00/00/0000 0039764 02/21./1995
0000691 LINCOLN NATIONAL
00/00/0000 0039765 02/21/1995
REO
I'J
STMT.
N
STMT.
tJ
STMT.
IJ
SIMI.
N
STMT.
SIMI.
14
SIMI.
tl
0000869 RIVERSIDE CO. EMPLOYEES SIMI.
00/00/0000 0039766 02/1.7/1.995 H
0001068 RAY BOUZA
00/00/0000 0039767 02/1.7/1.995
0000995 AFLAC
00/00/0000 0039768 02/15/1995
0001772 HAZEL J. PINNEY
00/00/0000 0039769 02/17/1995
Fir O
N
SIMI.
N
REO
N
0000279 DENTI CARE OF CALIFORNIA STMT.
00/00/0000 0039770 02/1.7/1995 N
0000279 DENTI CARE OF CALIFORNIA STMT.
00/00/0000 0039770 02/17/1995 II
0000279 IIENTI
CARE OF CALIFORNIA SIIIr.
00/00/0000 0039770 02/17/1995
N
F-.aciE 6
REPORT NUMBER 21
AMOUNT
89.634.26
:3711.10
3.175.98
16.993.44
3,0I6.00
.. 1.149.78
1,199.38
➢ . .'4.3.54
3.9'.4.49
1.146.73
331.81
:I..;391.43
16.11
F'RFr-'ARF:[' 03/01./1.995. 1.0:54101
I •l l:)ORAM I 103130
GROUP NUMBER i
ACCOUNTING PE:RIODI
GROW UTTER ANNE
00217 PREPAIDS
OB/1995
TRANS: TRANS CIAIF VOUCHER RK ACCOUNT NUMBER
3CRII F INN 1 DESCRIPTION 2
1600 02/22/1995 003786 00 O'1.0-7I00•-425.35--16
I FI F I'I II It: TEASE PURCHASE
1.700 02/22/1995 003787 00 010--2500-425.35-16
1Fi1..F.F'Ilf)lIl- L.F:AF;E F'I.IRF:I1AP;L
1000 02/22/1995 003788 00 010-3100-431.35-16
1 FE:I.. El" I I0I 11 (...EASE PURCHASE
1.900 02/22/1995 003789 00 010--4100-410.35--1.6
'I F I r I"I Ir1111 I F ATTE PURCHASE
2000 02/22/1995 003790 00 050-9000-450.35-16
IF I. EF'I It INI" LEASE PURCHASE
2100 02/22/1995 003791 00 055-4170-450.35-16
T F I.. rail '1 II.INF LEASE PURCHASE
IRCHASE
2200 02/22/1995 003792 00 010-7400-425.35-16
VoIDEL' r:HECI'
2300 02/22/1.995 003793 00 010-2500-425.35-16
V01TED cilEdt.
2400 02/22/1995 003794 00 010-3100-431.35-16
VOIDEP ITEM
2500 02/22/1995 003795 00 010-4100-410.35-16
001111711 CHEM.
2600 02/22/1995 003796 00 010-2500-425.35-16
00 T TIFII EMIT.
IT.
2700 02/22/1.995 003797 00 050--9000-450.35-16
VU114 R FI IF El
2800 02/22/1795 003790 00 055-4170-450.35-16
VOIDED 11IECE
2900 02/23/1995 003799 00 096-9700-470.21-10
I7't T`I I II fill IO SIAOF ME:1FT'
1000 02/23/1995 003000 00 010-1700-417.21-1.0
RET'I f I I l° -I I F'I:)c; T AM HE-1 TT.
City of San Jacinto
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST
PROJ F.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECKt CHECK DATE TYPE L.A.ST TRANS
0000766 NTFC
00/00/0000 0039771
0000766 NTFC
00/00/0000 0039771
0000766 NTFC
00/00/0000 0039771
0000766 NTFC
00/00/0000 0039771
0000766 NTFC
00/00/0000 0039771
0000766 NTFC
00/00/0000 0039771
0000766 NTFC
00/00/0000 0039597
0000766 NTFC
00/00/0000 0039597
0000766 NTFC
00/00/0000 0039597
0000766 NTFC
00/00/0000 0039597
0000766 NTFC
00/00/0000 0039597
0000766 NTFC
00/00/0000 0039597
0000766 NTFC
00/00/0000 0039597
0000369 U.S.
00/00/0000 0039772
0000369 U.S.
00/00/0000 0039772
CAPITAL CORPORATION STMT.
02/21./1995 N
CAPITAL CORPORATION STMT.
02/21/1995 N
CAPITAL CORPORATION STMT.
02/21/1995 N
CAPITAL CORPORATION STMT.
02/21/1995 N
CAPITAL CORPORATION STMT.
02/21/1995 N
CAPITAL CORPORATION STMT.
02/21/1995 N
CAPITAL CORPORATION 51594.52120
01/31/1995
N
CAPITAL_ CORPORATION 51594.52120
01/31./1.995
N
CAPITAL CORPORATION S1594,52120
01/31./1995
N
CAPITAL CORPORAT ION 51594.52120
01./31/1.995 N
CAPITAL CORPORATION 51.594.52120
01/31/1995
N
CAPITAL CORPORATION 51594.52120
01/31/1995
N
CAPITAL CORPORATION 51594.52120
01/31./1995
POSTMASTER
02/2:3/1.995
POSTMASTER
02/23/1.995
N
RE:O
N
PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER 21
AMOUNT
31..67
45:' . 40
2::-,3.18
T;A.84
56.84
56.84
St.67-
307.06-
::.:;:3. 18-
'56.84-
145.34-
56.94-
56.84--
72 4 .85
I.'7.91
RFPAREG 03/(. i9,/5. 10:54:01.
PONRAMT GM31311
GROUP NUMBER 1
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
GROUP USER ANNE
00217 PREPAIDS
08/1995
TRANS:, TRANS PATE VOUCHER DK ACCOUNT NUMBER
DESCRIPTION A prgcrarrim 2
3100 02/23/199 003801 00
PITIENTSH POSTAGE MEIER
3200 02/23/1995 003802 00
PEPLENTH POSTAGE' MITER
3300 02/23/1995 003003 00
PFTEENISIT rosmor METER
3400 02/23/1995 003804 00
PFTIFNISH POST/10F MEAEIR
3500 02/23/1995 003805 00
-,4•LENTSH POSTAGE METER
3600 02/23/1995 003E106 00
REPLENISH POSTAGE MEIER
3700 02/23/1995 003007 00
RFTLENISN POSTAGE METER
couNr:
AMOUNI:
010-2500-425.21-10
010-3210-431.21-10
010-3100-431.21-10
010-3200-431.21-10
010-3300-431.21-10
010-41S0-410.21-10
050-9000-450.21-10
CROUP TOTALS
37
1.26.414.31
City of Sah_...cinto I. .
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 21
PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECKf. CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
0000369 U.S.
00/00/0000 0039772
0000369 U.S.
00/00/0000 0039772
0000369 U.S.
00/00/0000 0039772
0000369 U.S.
00/00/0000 0039772
0000369 U.S.
00/00/0000 0039772
0000369 U.S.
00/00/0000 0039772
0000369 U.S.
00/00/0000 0039772
POSTMASTER
02/23/1995
POSTMASTER
02/23/1995
POSTMASTER
02/23/1995
POSTMASTER
02/23/1995
POSTMASISR
02/23/1995
POSTMASTER
02/23/1995
POSTMASTER
02/23/1995
REO
11
14
REO
REO
N
14
REO
REET
N
REO
11
N
REG
AMOUNT
232.42
29/.37
145.50
21.48
12.87
4.65
13.05
PREPARED 03/01/1995. 10154/01
PROGRAM: 1 0M31 3U
NROI.IT' NUMBER
ACCOUNTIN13 PERIODS
!MOUE 1.1SF:R ANNE
00227 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
00/1995
TRANS]. I RANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER
"il'I: I'I 1 10N I. DESCRIPTION 2
100 02/27/1995 003811
LEYri I.I IiOOM
200 02/27/1995 003812
KEYS r II I IIEPARIMENT
300 02/27/1995 003813
r'111 I'112I:NIT CYL..:I:NDF.:R S
400 02/27/1995 00381.4
...1. .' 11-I STREET
500 02/27/1995 003815
LIA(:IFRT AI ANALYSTS
600 02/27/1995 003816
F'ACIF I, F(1 ANALYSTS
_ 700 02/27/1995 003817
I1f"1F I(l Al ANALYSIS
1500 02/27/1995 003818
PAC1TF+frll ANALYSTS
900 02/27/1995 003819
I:T TY ')l f I I.CLE WASHES
1000 02/27/1995 003020
(En IN1:r.r11 ASS:I:SI r ::r:
1100 02/27/1995 003821
I ECL IN I CM ASSISTANCE
1200 02/27/1.995 003822
I '.LNAI PI'I LINO
1300 02/27/1995 00:3823
(`'TNAI., r'FI.L..INO
1400 02/27/1.995 003024
I-I'NAI.. PILLING
1500 02/27/1995 003825
D :CNAL, P I I,.! INN
00 025-7100-410.33-30
PARKS DEPARTMENT
00 010-3200-431.33-•30
00 050-9000-450.33.30
WATER DEPARTMENT
City of San Jacinto
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 21
2/2B/95
PROJ F.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE: NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECK* CHECK DATE TYPE LAST 1RANS
00 021.-4150-410.40-01
INTERSECTION IMPROVE:MEN'1'S
00 050-9000-450.33-30
WATER DEPARTMENT
00 050-9000-450.33-30
WATER DEPARTMENT
00 050-9000-450.33.30
WATER DEPARTMENT
00 050.-•9000-450.33-'30
WATER DEPARTMENT
00 019-3100-431.33-50
f'OL-Ics DEPARTMENT
00 096--9700-470.30-90
'-'ASS--THRU AGREEMENTS
00 091-9700-470.30-90
PASS-THRU AGREEMENTS
00 050-9000-450.30-90
AUDIT 1993/94
00 055-4170-450.30-90
AUDIT 1993/94
00 091.-9700-470.30--90
AUDIT 1993/94
00 096--9700-470.30- 90
AUDIT 1793/94
0000946 A-1 LOCK & KEY SERVICE 20026
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000946 A-1 LOCK & KEY SERVICE 20079
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000924 ALL PURE CHEMICAL
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
7170 0001655 ARCO PRODUCTS. INC.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000949 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000949 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000949 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000949 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000216 CAR WASH DEPOT
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000244 CONRAD & ASSOCIATES
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000244 CONRAD & ASSOCIATES
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000244 CONRAD & ASSOCIATES
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000244 CONRAD & ASSOCIATES
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000244 CONRAD & ASSOCIATE!S
02/2B/1995 0000000 00/0(>/0000
0000244 CONRAD & AS!SOCIATES
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
226135
N
3
N
51170
N
51.:131
14
19420
N
95--5017
Ii
95-5017
N
95-5015
N
95 501.5
N
95... 5015
LI
95 -5015
N
PAGE 9
AMOUNT
8.08
2.16
2,123.58
4,2147.96
12.00
'2.00
50.00
12.00
.J3.45
1.029.38
343.12
2.4:10.50
803.50
30_'.50
907.50
kF$•ARF.. L1 0.3/01. "1.995 . :1.01 54:01
I''1.10I:AM 1 1M31.3U
OPOUP NUMBER
ACCOUNT I NO
GROUP USER
PERIOD:
ANNE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST
00227 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 2/28/95
08/1995
TRANS: TRANS DATE VOUCHER DK ACCOUNT NUMBER.
ncSI::R I:I T I ON :l DESCRIPTION 2
1600 02/27/1995 003026
l E:IMRIIF- I WATER/TRASH
1.700 02/27/1995 003027
RL1'MI'I TI'. I• WATER/MASH
L000 02/27/1995 003820
RE IMIII.IRI;F WAIE.R/TRASH
L900 02/27/199S 003029
Fir1:MI.I lI_ WATER/TRASH
2000 02/27/1995 003030
F2L`IM111TkST WA1E'F</IT: ASII
2100 02/27/1995 003831.
R I'Mlil lr.•`-r- WATER/TRASH
2200 02/2 (/1995 003832
REIMBURSE. WATER/TRASH
2300 02/2'7/1995 003833
I":1'1 IMBI Il: TI W'Il 1101 RA!;II
2400 02/27/1995 003034
PET-M ORSE WATER/TRASH
2500 02/27/1995 003035
Itlii.:l',MDLIF:f'tIF: WAT I: R/ 1EAFiII
2600 02/27/1995 003836
LITIL..3: T): I:!
00 065•-0000-229.00--67
DEPOSIT
00 065-0000-229.08-67
DEPOSIT
00 065-0000-229.08-67
DEPOSIT
00 065-0000-229.08--6.7
DEPOSIT
00 065-0000-229.08-67
DEPOSIT
00 065-0000-229.08
DEPOSIT
00 065--0000-229.00
L.1Er'Of;IT
PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECK* CHECK DATE 'TYPE LAST TRANS
0001777 BILLY J. BATEY STMT
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001.778 CARL LINTON STMT
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001779 SHERYL TAYLOR SIM1
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001780 L.ARTHONOA KREBS STMT
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001701 NANCY REYNOLDS SINT
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
67 0001782 .JERRY BROWNING SlM1'
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
67 0001783 KURT DIETRICH STMT
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
00 065-0000-229.00-•67
DEPOSIT
00 065-0000-229.08-67
DEPOSIT
00 065-0000-229.08-67
DDEPCISI'T
00 025-7261-410.35-10
:2700 02/27/1995 00:3037 00 02 5-'7265-410.35-10
2800 02/27/1995 003030 00 025--7100--410.35-1.0
UTI1...:F I1 I:
2900 02/27/1995 003039 00 025 - 7256-410. 35- 10
(Ill, 1 '1 'I I'
2.000 02/2.7/1 95 003040 00 025- 7251-410. 35-10
11111 1111
0001784 LARRY D. HILLIS SINT
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 II
0001785 WARREN BLACK STMT
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001786 SUSAN K. COOK / J.M. BAIT STMT
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 IJ
_._ 0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER 11I51. STMT
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST. S1MI
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST. '.STMT
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WAI'E:R DIST. ST<•IT
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER LIST. SIMT
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
City of Sane -vac i nto F:--,- 10
REPORT NUMBER 21
AMOUNT
30.05
16.22
L4.22
12.89
22.19
10.65
7.13
13.86
.L.46
3.48
5.54
37.68
22.42
I7..75
:31:1 .01
PREPARED 03/0.L/1995. 10154:01 City of San Jacinto
F'E(ORFAM! 0M31:311
GROW NUMBER
ACCOUNTING PERIOD!
RF(FIIIF• II!!E"R ANNE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST
00227 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 2/28/95
08/1995
ANSI I RAN S DATE VOUCHER DK ACCOUNT NUMBER
:c'R T I I I ON .I I'IIr. SCR IFT I(IN 2
31.00 02/27/1995 003841 00 025--7761-410.35--10
3200 02/27/1995 003042 00 025-7253-410.35-'10
3300 02/27/1.995
I ITII.F FII S
3400 02/27/1.995
MU
3500 02/27/:L995
UTILITIES
003843 00 025--7255-410. 35--10
003844 00 025....7261-410.35--1.0
003845 00 025-7262-410.35--10
3600 02/27/1.995 003046 00 096-9700-470.21-10
'"'I•IC)R I:Tr MAIL.:I:NUS
3700 02/27/1995
F 1I(NFE. SERVICES
3000 02/27/:1995
111014 ';f PV:tc:Ii:!:i
3900 02/27/1.995
RIII:INIii: SERVICES
4000 02/27/1995
('F ONT STRVICE:Si
4100 02/27/1.995
PHONE ! TRVICF..:E1
REDEVELOPMENT ATTORNEY
003047 00
003048 00
003849 00
003850 00
003851 00
010-3100-431.35-16
0253-7256-410.35-1.6
010-2500-425.35-16
010-3100-431.35-16
010-6100-425.35-16
4.00 02/27/1.995 003052 00 025-• 7756-410.35-16
1 'I1C)NE 01 NVI.1I13
4300 (>2/27/1995 003053 00 044EB700-450.30-90
t:ONSIU TING SERVICES C.F.D. 111
4400 02/27/1.995 00.31154 00 046-0800-450.30--90
1;11I1SI II.I IFlI) SERVICE'S
t2
4500 02/27/1.995 007.1355 00 037-3100-431.30--90
1')NSUI..1'E40 SERVICES C.F.D. A3
PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE: NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE LAST' TRANS
0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER LIST. STMI
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST. STMT
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
II
0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST. STMT
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST. STMT
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST. STMT
02/2A/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000494 FEDERAL EXPRESS
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
02/2A/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
02/2A/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
5- 420 -27409
N
STMI.
IJ
SIMI.
II
II
STMT.
N
STMT.
N
STMT.
I!
6867 0001408 GOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 2045:1-1
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
6867 0001408 GOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 204:5:1-1
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
II
6867 0001408 GOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 2045:1. -1
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
PAGE 11
REPORT NUMBER 2:L
AMOUNT
9.85
5.54
6.92
.54
704.61
M.00
108.05
28.73
52.96
I19.'75
3'.57
211.73
499.37
4'9 .38
499.38
PRFCARE.II 03, :1995. 1.0:54:01
1'I:08RAM1 I3M31. `.F.1
OF:oUP NUMBER
ACCOUNTING F'ERIOI:11
(3r nur USER ANNE
City of Se, / cinto
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ot'ATE LIST
00227 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 2/28/95
00/1995
TRANS.:- 1RANS DATE VOUCHER DK ACCOUNT NUMBER
UI"'Sl':I<<I'I ION 1 DESCRIPTION 2
4600 02/27/1995 003856
Cl1NF11 I I I1CT SERV TL;EI1
4'700 02/27/19'75 003857
COI IT El1>
4000 02/27/1995 003850
C1'II..I:I MI>
4900 02/27/1.995 003859
C:F I.UI AI•: MONK 'SI"'F'tV1:C:C:;',
5000 02/27/1995 0031360 00
L.. I.UI AR PI -ZONE SERVICE
5100 02/27/1995 003861 00
MA 14 AP I'HIME. ¶:;I:::R'JIl:Ei•.
5200 02/27/1995 003062
t')FI...I_.III..AI: PHONE SERVICE
.5300 02/27/1995 003863
I...A4:4:)R A I 1 Or<NI:CY :;I:. vICF F.
5400 02/27/1995 003864
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
5500 02/27/1995 0(>31365
I G1111 III IANCE 111I<V1. EX!
5600 02/27/1995 003066
ONO D1S:I ANCE SERVICES:
5700 02/27/1995 0031367
NO ICI' 1ANCF StRVII:I''S
51100 02/27/1995 00.3868
F TRF I I -I' I RUC'iT R COURSE
000 02/27/1995 0031369
IT PI 11V1IRUCIIII< 1TiIq.:ilF 1.r.
66000 02/27/1995 003E370
I'OII1'I Ii111':-WA 1I'll< 1i11'1•I
00
0<>
00
0(>
00
00
00 042-8501-450.30-90
A.D. 87-1
00 021-4150-•410.33--30
I'UIII...IC WORKS
00 021-4150-410.33-30
rIJB1.-IC WORKS
00 01.0---3100-431.35-17
01.0--4100-410.35-16
010-1700-417.35-17
010-1200-412.35-16
010--11 11-41.1. 30-90
010-• 2500-4 25.35-16
01.0-7400-425.35--16
010-3200-431.35-16
010-3100-431.35-16
00 010-3200-431.31-20
00 01 0--3200-431 . 31-20
00 050-.9000-450.33-30
PROJ F.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE_ CHECK. CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
0001408 GOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000612 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000612 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000674 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000674 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000674 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000674 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
20451
N
532125
N
532:134
N
ST 111
14
S1MT
N
ST MT
I4
SEMI
14
0000689 LIEBERT,CASSIDY/FRIERSON STMT
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001080 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS 507004
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000 N
0001080 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS 507004
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
-. _. 0001080 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
I.,
50'70E14
N
0001080 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS 507084
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001776 BILL MACADAM
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001776 BILL MACADAM
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000710 MARDEN-SUSCO
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
14
RE:ai
N
REG
N
9.7992
11
12
REPORT N �i-.F< 21
AMOUNT
1116.84
152.41
313.50
1,022.91
47.83
60.56
00.78
3.134.00
.11
.06
4.32
21.11
;:';.00
i5.00
1,4.-73
17:EPARED 03/01/1995. 10:54:01 City of San Jacinto
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST RErORT NUMBER 21
,11:0GRAM: GM31311
'MOM' NUMBER
ACCOUNTING
nRour IISFR
PERIOD!
ANNE
00227 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
08/1995
1081, TRANS DA1E VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER
3RIP1100 I DESCRIPTION 2
6100 02/27/1995 003871
0TREE1 I
6200 02/27/1995 003072
WNIAL MT MODILE OFFICE
6300 02/27/1995 003873
QUIMPURSEMENT-PURCHASE OF
6400 02/27/1995 003874
TTAT1Eq-YEROX MACHINE
00 043-0501-450.40-01
'30BOBA VILLAGE
00 010-3100-431.34-05
POLICE DEPARTMENT
2/28/95
PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME
DUE DATE CHECK* CHECK DATE TYPE LAS! TRANS
00 010-1210-412.30-90
EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS
00 010-2500-425.21-10
6500 02/27/1995 003075 00 043-8501-450.30-90
1A1NsuLtioo SERVICES A.D. 94-1
COUNT:
AMOUNT!
GROUP TOTALS
65
64.628.59
02/27/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
7147 0001357 NOTTSON CONSTRUCTION
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
INVOICE NUMBER
3
N
0000922 SCOTSMAN MANUFACTURING CO CPX-03679-02-95
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000824 JOLENE SHAW REG
N
0000307 XEROX CORPORATION 154741018
N
0001408 GOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 20451-2
N
PAGE 13
AMOUNT
42.91.20
943.64
24.00
72.20
106.83
'REPARI:::D 03/0 /1995. 10:54:01 City of San.-viac i nto
'RCII3RAM: 13M31311 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST
wow NUMBER
- ACCOUNTING PERIOIIT
GROUP IISIER ANNE
00229 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
08/1995
TRANS: TRANS DATE VOUCHER Bli ACCOUNT NUMBER
11r i;i'R I I' I I ON 1. DESCRIPTION 2
100 02/28/1995 003876
L.AN1. T(I11 I...INFi: :3F.RVIC:E
200 02/28/1995 003877
DA!i?'1: Y: I'I I:> PAT' TE:I COURSE
300 02/20/1995 003E.178
APA SEMINAR
400 02/28/1995 003879
END! IPAL1(NS-P01.1:(aE DEPT.
500 02/28/1995 003E100
PONNFU I'OI:S--WATER DEPT.
600 02/28/1.995 0031381.
rJIA SEMI: NAR-.PAf:IsI..I.INII
700 02/20/1995 003882
IERTIII(MANCE RATTN(3 COURSE
000 02/20/1995 003883
I'1'1Y WITd' STREET SWEEPING
900 02/28/1995 003804
I -•I IONIC SERVICES
1000 02/28/1995 003085
I'i I(TNF' f1F.I2VIf:'ES
1100 02/20/1995 0038E16
PHONE SERVICES
1200 02/28/1.995 003807
=--- 11 .11:II INAIi
1.300 02/28/1995 003088
WIFAA n,', F%IFT::LITI:VE 11'tA1NINO
1400 02/28/1995 (>03009
bli.TI Idr I'll!. I'I r IdFI'I
1500 02/28/1995 00.3090
MOIJ1111 r MAINTENANCE' ON
00 010-3100-431.35-16
POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 010-3100-431.31-25
POST REIMBURSAF.II_F..
00 010-3100-431.31--25
POST REIMBURSABLE
00 010-3100-431.21.-15
00 050--9000-450.33--30
00 010-3100-431.31-25
POST REIMBURSABLE
00 010-3100-431.31--25
POST REIMBURSABLE
00 02.1- 4:I. L 0-410. 34-05
00
010 - 3100- 431 .35 _.16
OV 025-7156-410.35-1.6
00 050"-9000-450.35-16
00 010-3100-431.31-25
POST RE T MBIJRSATd..E
00 010-3100-431.31-25
POST REIMBURSABLE
00 0:1 P- 2500-425.21- JO
00 055.-41 f0--450.34-05
i,FWEF( I...lFT STAI TON
PROJ F.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME
DUE PATE CHECK# CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
0001006 AT & T LANGUAGE LINE
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001'720 YVETTE ARELLANO
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000953 BARRY BACKLUND
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001211 BANCROFT-WHITNEY
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000242 C.E.D.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000179 CF'OA
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000259 CURTIS CURTISS
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000984 R.F. DICKSON COMPANY
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL 'TELEPHONE CO.
02/20/19951 0000000 00/00/0000
0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001671 IIIANE HARPING
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000593 NAT HOLMES
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001590 HORIZON WATER
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000639 JIMNI SYSTEMS. INC.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
INVDICF_ NUMBER
S'INT.
N
REO
I•I
RE:O
N
STMT.
N
2983-087055
N
IJ
01004 710
N
SIMI.
N
SIMI.
Id
SIMI.
N
REO
N
Rrn
I4
1063
14
REPORT NUMBER 21
AMOUNT
50.00
1..740.00
67.00
304.67
J6.08
62.00
:.36. 00
7.00.5.75
13.3.45
.'9.18
I114.00
SY.50
'00.00
'PYEI''Aki 11 03/01 / 1. 9 9 :i'i . 10:54:0'.I
i l:)O12AN I I iH:3131.1
GROUP NUMBER 00229 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNTING PERIODS 08/1995
r>ROUr USER ANNE
1NS: TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER
.-:1CI: rrT I ON 1 DESCRIPTION 2
1600 02/213/1995 003891 00 010--3100-431.21-35
PAII.:IIF"I ). STRIPES -HICKS POLICE DEPARTMENT
:00 02/2E3/1995 0031392 00 085-0000--202 .2i.--05
I ir'r IU'•IIRANI.:E. r 'I<I MII.IM
1.1300 02/2B/1995 003893 (>0 010--7400-425.35-16
1 EL..TrEI 1U111: LEASE: PURCHASE
1900 02/20/1993 003094 00 010-2500-425.35-16
In I IT'I I(INI LEASE E r'ur<(::, iA%e:
2000 02/28/1995 003895 00 010-3100-431.35-16
1F1. Ft ill.)NE LEASE PURCHASE
2100 02/28/1995 003896 00 010--4100-410.35-16
I FT'I Till II L. F: ASF F'I.IRCHA: L
22(>0 02/20/1995 003897 00 050-9000-450.35-16
1 EI..EF''I II:1111:: LEASE_ PURCHASE
2300 02/28/1995 003890 (>0 055--4170-450.35-16
TFI....: P 1 IUl IE. LEASE r'I.1P<CI-IASF
2400 02/28/1995 003899
DATTF.R1 F-lINTT 105 6 :1.10
%,500 02/28/'1995 003900
11111 IillI PAIIN6 WUI"<KSI-ICIr
.1600 02/20/1995 003901
F'FF2C: AfI"ttJC'.T.A"11(1W IuIiE •
2700 02/20/1995 003902
F AIiK1i b HA1:N HIRE. I
-2000 02/21I/1995
r'ANks & 11AIN R1T<l7:F1
- 2900 02/213/1995
FAr<I .I r I iAIN °i I Pr l'" 1
003903
003904
.30 '0 02/20/ 1970 003705
1 601.' t I IA' '' I RI F 1
00 019-3100-431.21-74
POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 010--3100-431.31-- .%
POST' REIMBURSABLE
00 005-0000-202.21-43
00 025-7100-410.34--0 5
CLEANING
0(> 021-.4150-410.34--05
CLEANING
00 025-7256-410.34-.05
cL_FANTIrn
00 025 r256-410.34-0'5
(:t..EANIN(
City of San Jacinto PAGE 15
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 21
PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE CHECK* CHECK DATE TYPE LAST' TRANS
0000618 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
17.4304
(J
0000987 MASS. GENERAL LIFE INS. C STMT.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
IJ
0000766 NTFC CAPITAL CORPORATION 95030149997
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000766 NTFC CAPITAL CORPORATION 950301.49997
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000766 NTFC CAPITAL CORF'ORATIUN 95030149997
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
IJ
0000766 NTFC CAPITAL CORPORATION 95030149997
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
II
0000766 NTFC CAPITAL CORPORATION 95030149997
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
0000766 NTFC CAPITAL CORPORATION 95030:1.49997
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
14
0000769 NORTON BATTERY MFG. CO. 531381
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001049 P11W ASSOCIATES
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000828 PUBLIC EMF. ASSOC.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000806 PHOENIX PROGRAM INC.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000806 PHOENIX PROGRAM INC.
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000006 PHOENIX PROGRAM INC.
02/20/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0000006 PHOENIX FROORAM INC.
02/2a/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
N
k1E:U
II
SIMI.
N
2:L00
r1
2100
N
21130
IJ
21.00
II
AMOUNT
12.82
191..00
.11.67
:30 7.06
23.18
56.84
56.84
•.6.84
45879
434.00
140.20
9Q6.00
4130.00
540.00
'REPARE:D 03/01/ 1 99: . :1.0:54:01
' 00kAM 1 (.;M31314
r;_ROUr• NUMBER
ACCOUNTING PERIOD:
ITROEIP USER ANNE
00229 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
08/1995
TRANS: TRANS DATE: VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER
TIE.SUT<II I ION .1. DESCRIPTION 2
3100 02/28/1995 003906
C:'i'.TATTOW: PROCESSED
3200 02/28/.1.995 003907
I`I.ANNIIIC! COMM:I:S!ii:l:(:1NF:I?
3300 02/20/1995 003908
PL.AN:4 I:NG COMMISSIONER
3400 02/28/1995 003909
I •1. ANN1 NO COMMISSIONER
ONER
3500 02/20/1995 003910
PLANNING COMMISSIONER
3600 02/28/1.995 003911
I1 r1NNT NO I :OMM I. S!'>TIINrr:
3700 02/20/1995 003912
I'SD SEM I.NAR HARDTNI3
3800 02/28/1995 003913
3900 02/28/1995 003914
SUM 11-'1
4000 02/28/1995 003915
DASTC 1II0ESTEGATOI:S
4100 02/20/199S 003916
EIRFr IU11I ERS' ASSOCIATIION
4200 02/28/1995 00391.7
4300 02/20/1995 003910
rRW 1.1,(11 I RTY DATA CHr.('I*
4400 02/28/1995 00391.9
1 f1A111 TI NAY CONTRIBUTIONS
0(> 010-3100-431.34-05
DE_CEMBER 1994
00 010-1700-417.30--90
FEBRUARY 1995
00 010-1700-417.30-90
i EBRUARY 1995
00 010-1700-417.30--90
IF_9RLJARY 1995
00 010-1700-417.30-90
FEBRUARY 1995
00 010-1700-417.30-90
FEBRUARY 1995
00 010-3100-431.31-25
POST REIMBURSABLE
00 010-3100-431.21-17
POLICE DEPARTMENT
00 010-3100-431.21-50
POLICE DEPARTMENT
City of San -"Jacinto HFn.iE 16
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 21.
PROJ F.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER
DUE DATE_ CHFCK0 CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS
00 010-3100-431.31-17
)SOI.JR SE -F•OL ICE DEPARTMENT
00 085-0000-202.21--45
DUES
00 095-0000-202.21-42
ASSOCIATION DUES
00 010-3210-431.30•-•90
00 085-0000-.202.21-80
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
02/29/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
02/2B/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001517 PHOENIX GROUT' 8523 00
T4
0001.676 JIM AYRES Rr17
I•I
0001153 DOB DUISIERMARS RI'O
N
0000937 RICHARD HIXSON RFTT
N
0001677 KATHY MEADOWS REU
N
0001641 MAX PERRY RED
N
0001788 POWERPHONE. INC. 9824
N
0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 179128
I.1
0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 179128
02/28/1995 0000000 00/00/0000
0001096 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUE RT'.O
rI
0000495 S.J. FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC:. REP
N
0000912 S.J. POLICE ASSOCIATION REU
II
0001294 TRW REDI PROPERTY DATA ':I.:;11T5/1
T4
0000377 UNITED WAY OF HEMET Taiill
14
AMOUNT
65.00
100.00
100.00
1.00.00
100.00
100.00
17.7.00
564.84
150.00
60.00
1.524.24
120.00
145.16
COUNT:
A11111111I 1
GROUP TOTALS
44
20.303.27
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
TREASURER REPORT
FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY 1995
AGEADA 5 4
INSTITUTION INTEREST MATURITY PRINCIPAL
DATE SERIAL # RATE DATE AMOUNT
02-20-85 State-L.A.I.F.
General Serial # 9833794 5.612 OPEN $1,447,866
01-19-88 State-L.A.I.F
Redevelopment Serial # 5133120 5.612 OPEN $2,711,923
12-08-95 Home Savings of America
Serial # 107-035204-0 6.1 06-08-95 $2,000,000
CHECKING First Interstate
Serial # 3980000/1-98001 OPEN $1,921,925
UNION BANK
CFD NO. 2
TOTAL CFD NO. 2
CASH ON HAND $700
Total City & Redevelopment Investments $8,082,414
CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT (BOND FUNDS)
Account No. 7-11361
Citibank 7.81 9/01/2014 $1,052,969
Citibank 7.81 9/01/2014 $1,835,108
Dreyfus Trees Cash Mgt OPEN $1,604,095
REDEVELOPMENT Account No. 7-15639
Dreyfus Treas Cash Mgt
WATER-COP's Account No. 7-15584
Dreyfus Treas Cash Mgt
$4,492,172
OPEN $1,036,624
OPEN $581,659
Total Cash with Fiscal Agent $6,110,455
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $14,192,869
I certify that these investments comply with all State Laws pertaining to the investment of Local Agency
Funds and the City of San Jacinto's investment policies. There are sufficient funds to meet the City's next
30 days obligations.
Ken Leahy, Treasurer
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
f 1
14
(S A N
JACI NTO
TO:
AGENDA ��._. _
Staff Report
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Les Evans, Director of Public Works
via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: March 7, 1995
RE: BATH RESERVOIR: NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Recommendation:
Accept the new Bath Reservoir and authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of
Completion on behalf of the City.
Background:
The new Bath Reservoir has been satisfactorily completed by Trusco Tank Company.
The cost of the new reservoir was $307,195.00, which is the sum of the original bid
amount of $222,802 and Change Order No. 1 for Protective Coating (approved by the
City Council on November 1, 1994) in the amount of $84,393. The new one million
gallon tank will significantly improve the City's ability to fight fires and provide an
adequate supply of drinking water during periods of high demand.
a
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
201 East Main Street
San Jacinto, CA 92383
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR RECORDERS USE ONLY
Notice is hereby given by the undersigned owner, a political subdivision of the State
of California, that a public work of improvement described as the Bath Street
Reservoir
has been completed and was accepted by the undersigned awarding authority on the date
hereof.
The contractor on such work was TRUSCO TANK, INC.
and the surety bond is with
Tnsnrm rp Cnmp iuy nf t•hg tJ.
The real property upon which said work was performed is in the City of San Jacinto,
County of Riverside, State of California and described as: (Legal description S street
address or other specific location)
Second Street west of Camino Los Banos Avenue
Date: March 7, 1995 City nf Sen .7rir� ntn
(Date of Acceptance) (Name of Political Subdivision)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) By
so
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) Title
I hereby certify that I am the of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California the political subdivision which
executed the foregoing notice and on whose behalf I make this verification; that I have read
said notice, know its contents, and that the same is true. I certify under penalty of perjury
that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at San Jacinto, California on
(Date)
Deputy City Clerk
S A N
JACINTO
TO:
Staff Report
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Les Evans, Director of Public Works
via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: March 7, 1995
RE: CREATION OF THE POSITION OF UTILITIES SUPERINTENDENT
IN THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND APPROVAL OF THE
UTILITIES SUPERINTENDENT JOB DESCRIPTION
Recommendation:
Approve the creation of the position of Utilities Superintendent to replace the present
position of Water Superintendent in the Public Works Department and approve the
Utilities Superintendent job description.
Background:
In August, 1994 the City's Water Superintendent resigned to accept another position and
in January, 1995 the City's Public Works Maintenance Superintendent resigned to return
to school. Before proceeding with filling these management positions, City staff has
studied the responsibilities of each and would recommend revisions to the job
descriptions. At this time, staff is prepared to proceed with advertisement for the Water
Superintendent position, but would like to revise the responsibilities of that position to
include sewer line maintenance. Staff has already implemented the transfer of the
responsibility for sewer line maintenance from the Public Works Superintendent to the
Water Superintendent. This transfer of responsibility takes into consideration the
similarity of many of the water and sewer maintenance tasks as well as similarity of
equipment. In the past few months, the transfer of responsibility has worked well.
The salary of the new position of Utilities Superintendent would be the same as the
present Water Superintendent position, which ranges from $2,859 - $3,484 per month.
The position will remain part of the Management Group - Class B / Middle Managers.
City of San Jacinto
Personnel Department
Job Description
March 1995
UTILITIES SUPERINTENDENT
JOB SUMMARY
Under limited supervision, supervises the installation, construction, maintenance of water
and sewer facilities, and customer service; supervises City water distribution, pumping,
and equipment maintenance operations; and performs related duties as required. Works
under the direction of the Public Works Director.
REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES
Supervises, inspects, and may participate in the work of those engaged in the
installation, maintenance, and repair of water mains, fire hydrants, domestic water
services, water meters, booster pumping stations, and other water and sewer facilities
and equipment.
Assigns, advises, and may assist crews in the operation of the City's water distribution
system, filtration plants, reservoirs, pumps, and equipment maintenance.
Assigns, advises, and may assist in the work of staff engaged in meter reading,
installation, maintenance and repair, water service maintenance and repair, and
customer service; inspects the work of staff in the field; takes water samples to ensure
water quality.
Supervises and directs the work of staff responsible for skilled testing and repair of
meters, backflow devices, and other related appurtenances and performs a wide range
of emergency repair work.
Performs follow-up on customer complaints regarding water quality, water pressure, and
low and high billings; coordinates activities with other City staff in resolving customer
complaints.
Assigns crews to perform regular maintenance work on City facilities; inspects and
reviews work performed; maintains and updates records of maintenance and construction
work performed.
May review plans and blueprints of proposed development to ensure compliance with
City rules, policies, and regulations; discusses development plans with engineering staff
and inspectors.
Page Two
Utilities Superintendent
March 1995
REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES (continued)
Interact with appropriate State agencies in ensuring the City's compliance with federal
and state health regulations.
Interact with other water and sewer agencies on areas of mutual interest and concern.
Trains and evaluates employees; takes necessary disciplinary actions; assists in
selection of staff; and inspects timecards for proper allocation of time.
Prepares and administers the Water and Sewer budgets.
Answers emergency calls from the public and other agencies taking appropriate action
such as placing barricades, removing fallen trees and limbs, replacing street signs and
emergency patching of streets, water and sewer lines.
May supervise the Corporation Yard facilities' storage and maintenance.
Perform other duties as assigned.
KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES
Knowledge of:
Considerable knowledge of equipment operation, techniques, and methods used in
Water and Sewer maintenance; repair and installation of related facilities and
appurtenances; proper methods of collecting and preserving domestic water samples;
mathematical principles as applied to water systems; record keeping, budgeting, and
purchasing procedures; supervision, personnel, and training techniques; pertinent laws,
codes, safety orders and safe work practices.
Ability to:
Ability to supervise the work of others engaged in the area of specialization; allocate
equipment, materials, and personnel in a cost effective manner; read and interpret
blueprints, work sketches, and specialized maps; prepare work records and reports;
inspect work performed to ensure compliance with specifications; establish and maintain
cooperative working relationships; understand and follow verbal and written directions.
Page Three
Utilities Superintendent
March 1995
QUALIFICATIONS
Education:
High school diploma or equivalent and specialized training in Public Works and water
and sewer system operation and maintenance activities.
Experience:
Five years of increasingly responsible experience in the operation, construction and
repair of water and sewer facilities, including at least one year of supervisory experience.
License / Certificate:
Must possess a Class B California Driver's License.
Possession of/or ability to obtain, within one year of appointment, a valid Grade Ill
Operator Certificate from the State of California or the AWWA. Failure to obtain said
operator certificate within one year from hire date shall result in dismissal without right
of an administrative or judicial appeal.
�►( DA,
S A N
JACINTO
TO:
FROM: Les Evans, Director of Public Works
via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
Staff Report
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
DATE: March 7, 1995
RE: APPROVAL OF AUCTIONEER FOR AUCTION
OF CITY SURPLUS PROPERTY
Recommendation:
Approve the selection of Kozma Appraisal and Auction Service to carry out a public
auction of surplus City property.
Background:
On November 15, 1994, the City Council adopted a resolution declaring certain City
property surplus. Due to the large amount of surplus property to be auctioned, City staff
is proposing to hold the auction at the City Yard rather than at an auction site in the
Riverside or San Diego areas which has been the practice in the past.
City staff solicited proposals from five Auction Service Companies and received three
proposals. A brief summary of the proposals is shown below:
Company
Kozma Appraisal
and Auction Service
Hemet, CA
McCormack Auction
Company
El Cajon, CA
Fee
15% of gross
receipts
10% of gross
receipts
plus $5,000
OR
30% of gross
receipts
Other
City will pay cost of advertising
and legal notices. City will provide
personnel to set-up the auction and
assist on preview day and auction day.
Auction company will provide advertising.
City will provide personnel to set-up the
auction and assist on preview day and
auction day.
Page Two
Approval of Auctioneer
March 7, 1995
Company Fee Other
Don Akkerman 20% of gross City will pay cost of advertising and
Auctioneer receipts (verbal legal notices. City will provide personnel
Hemet, CA proposal) to set-up the auction and assist on
preview day and auction day.
All three firms are licensed and bonded and have shown excellent references. The
Kozma Appraisal and Auction Service has been in business less than a year, but has
good references. McCormack Auction Company is the biggest company of the three and
has considerable expertise and large staff. Any of the three firms could provide the
required service, however, staff recommends Kozma Appraisal and auction Service
based on their low fee and their San Jacinto Valley location.
The tentative auction date is Saturday, March 25, 1995.
AGENDA 5.8
TO:
FROM:
STAFF REPORT
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: March 7, 1995
SUBJECT:
Adoption of Ordinance No. 1008
An Ordinance repealing and re-establishing the City Sign Guidelines, Article
16, of Ordinance 340, the Zoning Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 1008, waive the reading of
the Ordinance in full and read by title only.
BACKGROUND
On February 21, 1995, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. 1008, thereby repealing
and re-establishing the City Sign Guidelines, Article 16, of Ordinance 340, the Zoning
Ordinance.
H:CCRPT\ADOR1008
II
ORDINANCE NO. 1008
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 3-94, THEREBY AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 340, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY
REPEALING AND RE-ESTABLISHING ARTICLE NO. 16,
THE SIGN GUIDELINES, OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Article 16 of Ordinance No. 340 is hereby repealed pursuant to Zoning
Ordinance Amendment 3-94, as herein set forth.
Section 2. Article 16 of Ordinance No. 340 is hereby re-established pursuant to Zoning
Ordinance Amendment 3-94, as shown on the attached exhibit marked Exhibit "A" and
made a part hereof.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance amendment and
cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and
published in the County of Riverside, State of California.
Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 21st day of February 1995.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 7th
day of March, 1995, by the following vote.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST
Mayor Deputy City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. 1008 duly
adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held
the 7th day of March, 1995.
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this
day of
Deputy City Clerk
-2-
EXHIBIT "A"
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 3-94
ARTICLE 16 SIGNS
16.01 PURPOSE
The purpose of this section is to promote sign guidelines which:
A. Integrate the elements of building and landscape design to promote a
harmonious architectural theme.
B. Protect the public health, welfare, safety, and aesthetics of the City.
C. Implement the design standards and unique characteristics of the City,
consistent with the General Plan and Neighborhood Program.
D. Ensure signs portray an effective message, that is clearly readable and
promote the City's appearance.
E. Reduce sign clutter and confusion to clearly identify the use and the
premises.
F. Create consistency in scale and proportion to the to use, site, or structure
the sign is serving.
G. Are flexible and provide for artistic expression in a simple, high quality
format.
H. Ensure the use of high quality materials and design to promote good
signage and continued maintenance of signs.
16.02 APPLICABILITY
No sign shall be erected or maintained in any land use district established by
Ordinance 340, the Zoning Ordinance, except those signs specifically enumerated
in this Section. The number and area of signs as outlined in this chapter are
intended to be the maximum standards. All signs proposed shall also be analyzed
based upon the sign's relationship to the overall appearance to the subject
property, the Neighborhood, and the surrounding community. Compatible design,
simplicity, and message effectiveness are to be considered for sign approval, in
addition to the maximum standards enumerated.
16.03 DEFINITIONS
Abandoned Sign - Any on -premise sign which has not advertised, in the last ninety
(90) days, an approved use or activity as allowed by this chapter.
See Article 16.08(B) for abandoned general outdoor advertising signs.
Address Sign - The numeric reference of a building or use to a street, included as
part of sign.
A -Frame Sign - A portable freestanding sign
hinged, folded or otherwise angled at the top,
forming a shape similar to the letter "A".
o
Animated/Moving Sign - A sign which uses movement, lighting, or special materials
to depict action or create a special effect or scene.
Awning/Canopy Sign - A sign that is printed on.
painted on, or attached to the vertical
surface of an awning.
Billboard - Any sign that directs attention to a business, profession, product,
commodity, or service that is not the primary business, profession, commodity,
product, or service sold, manufactured, conducted, or offered on the site on which
the sign is located. These signs are also referred to as general outdoor
advertising signs. These signs shall not include off -site real estate advertising
signs.
Business Park - A group of commercial or business use buildings planned,
designed, and constructed on the same site or contiguous sites, and having
common access and parking areas.
Construction Sign - A temporary sign erected on a parcel where construction is
taking place, and indicating the architect, engineer, landscape architect, contractor,
or similar artisans, and the owner, developer, financial sponsors, and similar firms
or individuals having a significant role or interest in the project.
Destruction of Sign - A sign which has either been 50% destroyed or has its
structural support(s) destroyed.
Directional Sign - A sign indicating directional messages for pedestrian and/or
vehicular traffic, such as "enter", "exit", etc.
Directory Sign - A sign used for listing the tenants or occupants of a building or
center.
Flashing Sign - A sign that displays an intermittent or sequential flashing light
source.
Sign Guidelines, Page No. 2 (Adopted 3/7/95)
Freestanding Sign - A sign, not of a temporary nature,
detached from any building and supported by one or more
poles or other similar structural components.
General Outdoor Advertising Sign - See Billboard.
GFA Gross Floor Area - The total floor area of a building or structure or
combination thereof, including the leasable area, restrooms, hallways, stairwells,
elevator shafts, escalators, and storage rooms.
Illegal Sign - A sign installed without issuance of a sign permit
Illuminated Sign - A sign lighted with an artificial light source.
Industrial Park - A group of light industrial buildings planned, designed, and
constructed on the same site or contiguous sites, and having common
access and parking areas.
Institutional Use - A for profit or non-profit facility including, churches, educational
uses, hospitals and the like.
Kiosk - An off -site sign used for directional purposes to businesses, sales offices,
model homes complexes, and/or points of interest, etc..
Logo - An established trademark or symbol associated with a business or
corporation.
Monument Sign - An freestanding sign, the
structure of which is supported from grade
giving the appearance of having a solid base.
1
ill
Nonconforming Sign - Any sign, not of a temporary nature, legally constructed
which does not comply with the provisions of this chapter.
Office Park - A group of office buildings planned, designed, and constructed on the
same site or contiguous sites, and having common access and parking areas.
Offsite Real Estate Sign - A sign erected on a parcel that is not the location of the
real parcel that the sign is advertising for sale, rent or lease.
Offsite Sign - A sign erected on a parcel that is not the location of the business or
use that the sign is advertising.
Sign Guidelines, Page No. 3 (Adopted 3/7/95)
Political Sign - A temporary sign directly associated with national, state, or local
elections.
Promotional Sign - A temporary sign used to promote a sale, new product line,
new management, new service, and like activities or events.
Real Estate Sign - An on -site sign pertaining to the sale or lease of the premises.
Roof Sign - A sign erected, constructed,
or placed upon or over a roof of a building,
including a mansard roof and which is totally
or partially supported by such building.
Shopping Center - A group of retail uses planned, designed, and constructed on
the same site or contiguous sites, and having common access and parking areas.
Sign - Any display and the associated structure used to advertise or draw attention
to a product, business activity, property, or message, whether attached to/or
placed upon the ground, a building, a pole, or suspended in air.
Sign Area - The entire face of sign, including the surface and any framing,
projections, or molding, but not including the support structure. Individual channel
letters mounted on a building shall be measured by the area enclosed by four
straight lines outlining each word.
Sign Height - The vertical distance measured from the ground at a point
intersecting the sign structure or supports to the highest point or projection of such
sign.
Sign Program - A coordinated, detailed program of one or more signs for an
individual building or building complexes with multiple tenants.
Temporary Real Estate Signs - A sign not permanently anchored to the ground,
displayed for a period of time while sales or leasing of property is actively ongoing.
Temporary Sign - A sign that is not permanently affixed to a building or the ground.
Trademark - A word or name which, with a distinctive type or letter style is
associated with a business or business entity in the conduct of business.
Vehicle Sign - A sign which is attached to or painted on a vehicle which is parked
on, adjacent to, or near any property, in such a manner and/or for a length of time
to show intention to merely create additional signage rather than a vehicle used for
business purposes.
Sign Guidelines, Page No. 4 (Adopted 3/7/95)
Wall Sign - A sign painted on or fastened to a
wall and which does not project more than
12 inches from the building or structure.
Window Sign - Any sign, whether or not temporary
in nature, that is applied or attached to a window
or located in such a manner that it can be seen
from the exterior of the structure.
16.04 PERMITS
Except as provided elsewhere in these regulations, no person, firm, or corporation
shall erect, construct, move, alter, place, suspend, attach, paint, or display any
sign or cause or permit the same to be done without first obtaining appropriate
permits from the Department of Community Development.
A. EXCEPTIONS
1. Window signage not exceeding 25 percent of the area of such
window, determined on a pane by pane basis.
2. Interior signage not visible from the exterior of the building.
3. Memorial signs, plaques, and associated displays installed by civic
organizations recognized by the City.
4. Official and legal notices issued by a court or governmental agency.
5. Official flags of the United States, State of California, and other states
of the nation, countries, municipalities, official flags of foreign nations,
and national or international organizations.
6. Real estate and construction signs, not in excess of one per street
frontage, 32 sq. ft. or less in area and less than 7 ft. in height.
7. Maintenance of existing advertising for an existing business.
8. Directional, informational or warning signs authorized by federal,
state or municipal authority.
9. Temporary rural area and/or residential signage less than 4' X 4.'
Said signage shall not be in place for in excess of 30 days.
Sign Guidelines, Page No. 5 (Adopted 3/7/95)
10. Political signs, provided said signs are not placed in or over the
public right-of-way and provided all such signs are removed no later
than 14 after the date of the applicable election. Any political signs
located in or over the public right-of-way or in place more than 14
days after the applicable election will be subject to immediate
removal and destruction. The City may utilize any available legal
method to recoup costs associated with the removal of the illegal
political signs from the advertising political campaign or candidate.
11. Signs attached to vehicles, but do not meet the definition of "vehicle
sign."
B. PERMIT APPLICATION
1. The plans for each sign shall include a drawing in triplicate showing
the design, color, size, type of attachment, source of illumination,
and the proposed height.
2. A fully dimensioned plot plan, to scale, indicating the location of the
sign on the building or site relative to adjacent streets, right-of-way,
sidewalks, other building or structures, and the number, size, and
location of all existing signs on the same building or lot, or for the
business if the same business is conducted on contiguous lots.
3. Any permit which has been issued as a result of a misrepresentation
of fact by the applicant may be summarily revoked by the
Community Development Department, who shall thereupon give
written notice of revocation to the applicant. Within fifteen (15) days
thereafter, any sign authorized by said permit shall be removed.
Failure to remove such display within a fifteen (15) day period is a
violation of this ordinance, as a public nuisance.
16.05 SIGN PROGRAM
A. Multiple tenant shopping centers, office developments and
business/industrial parks shall submit a detailed sign program to the
Director of Community Development. Said sign program shall be submitted
prior to the issuance of any building permit related the development. The
sign program shall include the following elements:
1. Identification of the colors and materials to be used for all signage in
the development. The colors and materials shall be consistent with
those used/proposed for the applicable development.
Sign Guidelines, Page No. 6 (Adopted 3/7/95)
2. Method of mounting, support structures and illumination shall be
delineated. Each program shall utilize consistent sign construction
techniques, mounting mechanisms and methods of illumination.
3. Sign placement criteria, letter height, and logo height for all uses and
tenants.
B. Where a specific plan is proposed, said specific plan shall include a detailed
sign program delineating all proposed signage and proposed sign
standards, including entry monumentation. Said sign program shall be
incorporated into the proposed specific plan as a mandatory element of
said specific plan.
16.06 PROHIBITED SIGNS
A. Abandoned signs, as provided for in Section 16.08.
B. Animated, moving, flashing, blinking, reflecting, revolving, or any other
similar sign (excluding electronic message boards).
C. Banners, flags and pennants, except as provided by Section 16.07.
D. Chalkboards/blackboards.
E. Changeable copy signs, except as provided by Section 16.11, B, and D.
F. Off -site or billboards, except as provided by Section 16.09, B.
G. Portable signs or A -Frame signs.
H. Roof signs.
I. Signs in or over public right-of-way, except as provided by Section 16.09,
A.
J. Signs painted on fences or roofs.
K. Inflated devices, except as provided by Section 16.07.
L. Vehicle Signs.
M. Signs which simulate in color or design traffic control devices or signs, or
which may mislead or confuse pedestrian or vehicular traffic.
N. Window signs exceeding 25% of the window area, pane by pane, excepts
as provided by Section 16.07.
16.07 TEMPORARY SIGNS
Special event signs may be permitted subject to the approval of the Department
of Community Development for a limited period of time for such events as grand
openings, carnivals, parades, charitable events and holiday/promotional sales.
Special event signs shall be subject to the following:
Sign Guidelines, Page No. 7 (Adopted 3/7/95)
1. Community Related or Charitable Events by Recognized Civic Organizations
shall be allowed temporary signage, subject to submittal of temporary sign
permit. Sign type and duration of posting shall be determined by the
Department of Community Development based upon the event.
2. Temporary sign permits shall be obtained prior to the posting or placement
of temporary signs for promotional sales or events by for profit
organizations or businesses. The following provisions apply to placement
of such signs:
a. Promotional signs shall be limited to the duration of the sale or event,
but in no case shall a promotional sign be in place for in excess of
30 days.
b. Promotional signs shall be limited to 60 days per calendar year.
c. Promotional signs may include balloons, inflated devices, search
lights, beacons, banners, flags, pennants and streamers.
16.08 GENERAL PROVISIONS
A. ENFORCEMENT
It shall be the duty of the Department of Community Development and the
Code Enforcement Division to enforce the regulations of this chapter.
1. Any sign erected, constructed, altered, enlarged, converted, moved,
abandoned or maintained contrary to the provisions of this chapter,
shall be, and the same hereby is declared to be unlawful and a
public nuisance. Upon determination of a sign as a nuisance, the
sign shall be removed in a reasonable period of time, as determined
by the Department of Community Development or Code Enforcement
Division. If the sign owner disagrees with the determination, said
owner may request one of two actions:
1. Appeal to the Community Preservation Committee for an
extension of the time to remove said sign; or
2. Apply for Variance in accordance with the provisions of
Ordinance No. 340.
Sign Guidelines, Page No. 8 (Adopted 3/7/95)
B. MAINTENANCE OF SIGNS
1. The user, owner, or lessee of any sign authorized by these
regulations shall maintain said sign in a safe, presentable, and
structurally sound condition at all times, including the replacement of
defective parts, and any other acts required for the maintenance of
said sign. Failure to comply with these requirements will cause sign
to be declared a public nuisance, and shall be removed in
accordance with Ordinance No. 978.
2. In the case of abandoned signs, the identification, name and copy
pertaining to the abandoned business, product, or idea shall be
removed upon the order of the Department of Community
Development. This does not necessarily apply to the permanent
structure or cabinet when said structure or cabinet complies with the
provisions of this chapter. Where the abandoned sign copy has
been removed and the interior of the cabinet is exposed, the
exposed portion of the cabinet shall be covered with a durable
material, in a color to match the existing signs and/or buildings on
the property. In the case of general outdoor advertising signs, such
sign shall be totally removed if no product, business, property,
message, or idea has been advertised in the previous twelve (12)
months. Failure to remove an abandoned sign shall constitute a
public nuisance to be removed in accordance with Ordinance No.
978.
If it is determined by the Department of Community Development that
a sign shall cause imminent danger to the public safety, and contact
cannot be made with the sign owner, building owner, or property
owner, no written notice shall be served. In documented emergency
situations, the city may cause the danger to be removed.
a. The City shall cause any sign to be removed that is a public
nuisance or that endangers the public by reason of electrical
or structural hazards. Any sign removed by the City pursuant
to these provisions shall become the property of the City, to
be disposed of any manner deemed appropriate.
b. The cost of removal of a sign shall be considered a debt
owed the City by the sign owner and property owner,
recoverable by legal action or a lien against the property. The
cost of removal shall include any and all expenses incurred by
the City, including legal fees.
Sign Guidelines, Page No. 9 (Adopted 3/7/95)
C. NON -CONFORMING SIGNS
In order to limit the number and extent of nonconforming signs created by
adoption of this ordinance, it is the intent of this ordinance to permit
nonconformities to continue until they are removed but not to encourage
their survival. Therefore, a sign, not temporary in nature, in existence prior
to the effective date of this ordinance or upon annexation to the City shall
be allowed to exist except as follows:
1. No legal nonconforming sign shall be enlarged, expanded, extended,
altered, moved, re-established after abandonment, or restored after
destruction, except as provided elsewhere in these regulations.
2. Nonconforming signs shall be removed when a property is further
developed, in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance.
3. Nonconforming signs shall be removed prior to the installation of new
signs advertising the same business or any new business on the site.
4. Existing legal billboard signs shall be removed when the property on
which the sign is located is further developed.
16.09 REAL ESTATE AND BILLBOARD SIGNS
A. KIOSK/OFF-SITE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS
1. No off -site directional signs shall be placed in the City unless they
are part of a City approved program and comply with the following
regulations.
a. Panel and sign structure (Kiosk) shall be of uniform design
and approved by the Community Development Director.
b. A sign structure shall be located not less than 600 feet from
an existing or previously approved sign site. Further, each
sign may only contain the name of the business or
development and a directional arrow.
c. The placement of each sign structure shall be reviewed and
approved by the Director of Community Development or
authorized staff.
Sign Guidelines, Page No. 10 (Adopted 3/7/95)
d. All signs are to be placed on City right-of-way with City
Encroachment Permit obtained and filed with the Department
of Community Development prior to issuance of permit.
e. A sign location plan shall be prepared showing the site of
each directional sign and shall be submitted to the
Department of Community Development prior to the issuance
of a sign permit.
f. There shall be no additions, tag signs, streamers, devices,
display boards, or appurtenance added to the signs as
originally approved. Further, no other directional signs may
be used, such as posters or trailer signs.
g.
Other temporary off -site directional signs ("bootlegs") shall
only be allowed pursuant to a Resolution adopted by the City
Council, which outlines a program for placement and removal
and administration of said program.
B. BILLBOARDS
1. No general outdoor advertising signs shall be permitted in the City
except as noted below. Furthermore, said signs which exist shall be
removed when the property upon which they are situated develops
further.
A. Said signs are allowed in the C-2 and M-1 Zones, as
replacement for an existing general outdoor advertising sign
on the same site only, subject to the following requirements:
1. A Conditional Use Permit shall be obtained by the
proponent prior to the replacement of any such sign.
The replaced sign(s) shall be removed prior to the
erection of the replacement sign.
2. Signs shall be no closer to the property line than the
setbacks allowed in the zone, measured from the
ultimate right-of-way.
3. Such signs shall be limited to one sign per parcel,
located no closer than 500 ft. apart with no more than
four (4) sign structures per statute mile along the same
street.
Sign Guidelines, Page No. 11 (Adopted 3/7/95)
4. All signs shall be on a single pole.
5. All signs may be provided with illumination. All
electrical to such signs shall be underground.
6. All signs shall be 12 ft. by 24 ft. (no larger or no
smaller).
7. The top of the sign shall be no more than 25 ft. above
the average grade within 25 ft. of the sign. The bottom
of the sign shall be no less than 9 ft. above the
average grade within 25 ft. of the sign.
8. A Business License shall be obtained for all general
outdoor signs.
16.10 BUSINESS SIGNS
A. WALL SIGNS
1. Main Wall Sign
a. Except as permitted elsewhere in these regulations, any
business shall be allowed one main wall sign on the side of a
building containing the main entrance.
2. Accessory Wall Signs
a. Each business with a gross floor area of 20,000 sq. ft. or
more shall be permitted accessory wall signs on the building
frontage containing the main wall sign. The area of all the
accessory wall signs shall not exceed the area of the main
wall sign as constructed; and the letter height of the
accessory wall signs shall not exceed 50 percent of the letter
height of the main wall sign. By way of example:
If the main wall sign is 50 square feet, then the total
area of all accessory wall signs can not exceed 50
square feet.
If the letters on the main wall sign are 18 inches, the
letters for the accessory wall signs can not exceed 9
inches in height.
Sign Guidelines, Page No. 12 (Adopted 3/7/95)
3. Maximum Area for Main/Accessory Wall Signs
a. The total area of the main wall sign shall be based upon the
ratio of one (1) sq. ft. per lineal ft. of building frontage.
However, the main wall sign does not have to be less than 32
sq. ft. In no case shall the main wall sign exceed 100 sq. ft..
Where accessory wall signs are permitted, the total area of all
wall signs combined, shall not exceed 150 square feet.
4. Street Side Wall Signs
a. A business activity shall be allowed one additional sign on the
side of the building, not including the main entrance, which is
adjacent to, fronts on, or is directly accessible from a public
street, with no building or structure separation.
5. Maximum Area for Street Side Wall Signs
a. Street side signs shall not exceed the lesser of 1 sq. ft. of sign
area per lineal foot of building frontage or 50 square feet,
except as permitted elsewhere in these regulations.
6. No portion of any wall mounted sign shall extend above or beyond
the vertical height of any exterior wall or roof structure.
B. CANOPY/ROOF SUSPENDED SIGN
1. Canopy Signs
a. Businesses within buildings having a roof structure or canopy
on the wall containing a public entrance may suspend or
otherwise paint or attach a sign from or on the roof overhang
or canopy.
2. Maximum Area for Roof Overhang/Canopy Suspended Signs
a. Roof overhang/canopy signs shall not exceed 8 square feet
and suspended signs shall maintain a minimum clearance of
8 ft. above the ground.
Sign Guidelines, Page No. 13 (Adopted 3/7/95)
C. FREE STANDING SIGNS
1. Individual Commercial/Office/Industrial Developed Parcels and
Shopping Centers, Office Complexes, Business Parks and Industrial
Parks with less than 50,000 Square Feet (GFA) shall be allowed the
following:
a. One free standing sign pertaining to the use on the property.
b. One secondary free standing sign per each additional street;
said secondary free standing sign shall be located on such
additional street.
c. Free standing signs permitted under this subsection shall not
exceed 50 sq.ft. of display area per sign face. Secondary free
standing signs permitted under this subsection shall not
exceed 25 square feet.
d. Monument signs shall be required and shall be no more than
15 ft. in height.
2. Shopping Centers 50,000 Square Feet to 100,000 Square Feet (GFA)
shall be allowed the following:
a. One primary free standing sign.
b. One secondary free standing monument type sign per each
additional street; said secondary free standing sign shall be
located on such additional street.
c. Primary free standing sign shall not exceed 100 sq. ft. of
display area per sign face. Secondary free standing
monument type signs shall not exceed 50 sq.ft. of display
area per sign face.
d. Monument signs are strongly encouraged. However, primary
free standing signs shall not exceed 25 feet in height.
Secondary free standing monument signs shall not exceed 15
feet in height.
3. Shopping Centers 100,001 Square Feet (GFA) and Larger shall be
allowed the following:
a. One primary free standing main sign.
Sign Guidelines, Page No. 14 (Adopted 3/7/95)
b. One secondary free standing monument type sign per each
additional street; said secondary free standing sign shall be
located on such additional street.
c. Primary free standing sign shall not exceed 150 square feet
display area per sign face. Secondary free standing
monument type signs shall not exceed 50 sq.ft. of display
area per sign face.
d. Monument signs are strongly encouraged. However, primary
free standing signs shall not exceed 35 feet in height.
Secondary free standing monument type signs shall not
exceed 15 feet in height.
4. Office Developments, Business Parks and Industrial Parks 50,000
Square Feet (GFA) and Larger shall be allowed the following:
a. One free standing sign per street, and located on such street.
b. Free standing signs shall not exceed 50 sq. ft. of display area
per face.
c. Monument signs shall be required and shall not exceed 15
feet in height.
D. HOME OCCUPATION BUSINESS
1. One permanent type free standing sign no more than two (2) square
feet in area.
E. SPECIFIC PLANS
1. Businesses located within approved specific plans shall comply with
the approved sign program provided for in Section 16.05, B.
16.11 SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCE SIGNAGE
A. INSTITUTIONAL USES
1. Institutional uses shall be permitted one sign per use, either wall or
monument, not to exceed 32 square feet for a wall sign, and 50
square feet for a monument sign. Monument signs shall not exceed
15 feet in height.
Sign Guidelines, Page No. 15 (Adopted 3/7/95)
2. Additionally, schools shall be permitted one marquee sign per street
frontage, the area of which shall not exceed 75 square feet.
Marquee signs shall not exceed 20 feet in height.
B. DRIVE THROUGH FAST-FOOD RESTAURANTS
1. In addition to those signs permitted in Section 16.10 above, drive
through fast food restaurants shall be permitted additional signage
as follows:
a. One freestanding menu board, not to exceed 30 square feet,
and 7 feet in height.
b. One wall mounted menu board, not to exceed 15 square feet,
located in the area of the drive through lane only.
c. Directional signs, minimum number to provide adequate
information. Signs shall not exceed 5 square feet, and shall
be limited in copy to such terms as "enter," "exit," and
directional arrows.
C. GAS/SERVICE STATIONS
1. Notwithstanding Section 16.10C above, Gas/Service Stations shall
be permitted free standing signage as follows:
a. Stations fronting on one street shall be permitted one sign,
not to exceed 74 square feet, which shall include business
identification and state mandated price identification signage.
b. Stations fronting on two or more streets shall be permitted
one sign per street frontage, not to exceed 74 square feet per
sign, each of which shall include business identification and
state mandated price identification signage.
b. Special service signs are permitted up to a maximum of six
per site, and located at the site of said special service
provided said signs do not exceed 2 square feet.
D. SPECIAL EVENT CENTERS (Skate Rinks, Theaters, Stadiums and the
like whose activities and/or events change on a regular basis)
1. In addition to those signs permitted in Section 16.10 above, Special
Event Centers shall be permitted additional signage as follows:
Sign Guidelines, Page No. 16 (Adopted 3/7/95)
a. Marquee sign, one per street frontage, either wall mounted or
free standing, the area of which shall not exceed 50 percent
of the allowable signage per sign type. Theaters with 3 or
more screens, shall be permitted an additional 10 square feet
of sign area per screen, up to maximum of 100 square feet.
b. Glass encasements for special advertisements shall be
permitted to be affixed to the main building. Such
encasements shall not exceed a width of 3 feet or a height of
4 feet, the number of which shall be approved by the
Department of Community Developemnt.
16.12 GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA
A. Wall and roof/canopy signs shall be compatible with the predominant
architectural and visual elements of the center or building.
B. The use of English -type lettering (Indo-European linguistic symbols: a-z)
shall be provided on all signs. Non -English -type symbols are permitted
provided said symbols are accompanied by English -type lettering translating
the meaning of the symbols.
C. Where multiple signs are proposed, all signs shall be consistent in the type
of construction material, letter size and style, and support method. The use
of graphics is permitted provided the graphics are limited to the logo of the
business or product being advertised. Graphics shall be included in the
allowable sign or copy area.
D. Where there is a center name or identification that is separate from the main
tenant, said center name or identification shall be provided on the main
freestanding sign and shall be included in the allowable sign or copy area.
E. All free standing signs shall be placed in a landscaped area. The poles on
free standing pole signs shall be architecturally treated so as to be
consistent with the architecture of the building or center upon which the
sign is located.
F. Site address or range of addresses shall be included on the main
freestanding sign. Address shall be delineated with a minimum of eight (8")
letters and shall not be counted within allowable sign or copy area. Building
mounted addresses shall be provided as required by the Fire Marshall.
Sign Guidelines, Page No. 17 (Adopted 3/7/95)
e;:=:FDA Z • •
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Acting as Redevelopment
Agency
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE March 7, 1995
SUBJECT: REVISION TO THE DOWN PAYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION
Approve revisions to Down Payment Assistance Program as outlined in the staff report.
BACKGROUND
On August 23, 1994, the Agency adopted the attached Down Payment Assistance
Program (Exhibit "A".) In working with lenders we found some elements of the program
that limited its availability to very few households.
The program is supposed to be available to low (between 50% and 80% of median
income) and moderate (between 80% and 120% of median income) income families.
Whether a household is low or moderate income is determined by both income and
household size.
Exhibit "B" is a worksheet, based on the existing program, provided to us by a local
lender who is very interested in working with our housing program. The shaded areas of
the worksheet are the household and incomes that would qualify for the existing program.
It is an indication of the limited assistance our program provides.
The lender has also indicated to staff that in order to make a bank loan sellable to Fanny
Mae or Freddie Mac, a buyer's total monthly housing payment cannot exceed 33% of
gross monthly income and the buyer's overall debt ratio should not exceed 38% of
income.
Our existing program limits the buyer's total monthly payment to 30% for households up
to 80% of median income. Staff recommends this be increased to 33% to conform to the
above underwriting guidelines.
Page No. 2
March 7, 1995
For households having an income between 81% and 120% of median income, our
existing program requires a minimum payment of 28% of gross monthly income. The
28% floor is the factor that eliminated most moderate income households from qualifying
for our program. Staff recommends eliminating the floor altogether.
Exhibit "C is the proposed wording change that will increase the usefulness of this
program.
H:\CCrpt-95\PyMt-MS.prg
EXHIBIT "A"
DOWN PAYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
1. Introduction
This program has been designed to meet the needs of low or
moderate income persons and families who wish to purchase their home
within the City limits of San Jacinto, but are unable to qualify and/or
afford the necessary down payment without financial assistance.
Assistance will be provided by the San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency
referred to as "The Agency" as follows:
II. Eligibility
Only those households with moderate indebtedness and good credit
history will be eligible for this program. Total household income must not
exceed 120% of median income as adjusted for family size.
III. Location
Homes to be purchased must be Single Family Residences (SFRs)
located within the Heritage Neighborhood of the City of San Jacinto. All
homes must be in model demonstration neighborhoods and/or be part of
assisted redevelopment projects.
IV. General Program Description
The Agency will provide eligible households with down payment and
closing cost assistance. Closing cost assistance is limited to 3% of the
purchase price. Program participants are required to accept the highest
fixed rate loan for which they qualify for; in no case will total assistance
from the Agency exceed $7,500 per household.
All applicants will be required to provide a down payment from personal
funds equivalent to a minimum of 3% of the purchase price of the home.
The first mortgage obtained by the borrower(s) from the borrowers'
primary lender, must be a thirty year fixed rate, level payment mortgage.
Balloon payments and temporary buydowns are ineligible. FHA adjustable
rate mortgages and 1 year ARM's tied to the 1 year Treasury Bill will also
be accepted.
Applicants whose gross annual income, as adjusted for family size, is
between 0-80% of the median income, must have a total monthly payment
(PITI & PMI) which does not exceed 30% of the applicant's gross monthly
income. A Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) from the County of Riverside
may be used in conjunction with the Agency's down payment assistance.
Applicants whose gross annual income, as adjusted for family size, is
between 81-120% of the median income must have a total monthly
payment (PITI & PMI) not less than 28% of the applicant's gross monthly
income, but does not exceed 35% of the applicant's gross monthly income.
The amount of down payment assistance plus the 1st trust deed
exceed 97% LTV of purchase price.
The amount of closing cost assistance Is not to exceed 3% of
price. (Total amount of assistance not to exceed $7,500).
V. Applicants Participation In The Program
is not to
purchase
There will be a non-refundable $50.00 reservation fee paid by the
applicant. The reservation will be valid for 60 days, with an option for an
additional 30 day extension for an additional S25.00. In addition,
applicants are required to 1) participate in a first time buyers' seminar
sponsored by the Fair Housing Council in the City of Riverside, 2) be pre -
qualified by lender in order to help them determine the price of the house
they can afford.
The Agency will provide down payment assistance to low and moderate
income families when gross annual income does not exceed 120% of
median income in the form of a forgivable deferred loan at a simple
interest rate of 5% repayable to the Agency. The principal and interest of
this loan will be forgiven, based on the length of ownership, pursuant to
the following schedule:
Tenure of Ownership Interest Rate P & I Forgiven
0-10 years
10 years, 1 day - 15 years
15 years, 1 day - 20 years
20 years, 1 day - 25 years
25 years, 1 day - 30 years
Over 30 years
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
0%
0%
25%
50%
75%
85%
100%
2
The following items are required from the applicant for down payment
assistance:
1. The residence must be the borrower's Principal Residence.
2. The borrower shall be required to submit an annual affidavit of
occupancy.
3. The borrower shall maintain current payments of the first trust
deed, property taxes, and hazard insurance. An acceleration clause shall
cause the Agency loan to be immediately due and payable upon sale,
transfer, or refinancing of the property or when the property is no longer
the applicants principal residence. An acceleration clause shall also be
invoked if the borrower willfully and knowingly makes a false statement
or representation, or knowingly falls to disclose a material fact for the
purpose of qualifying for the program.
4. The borrower must participate in a home ownership and personal
finance counseling program by the Fair Housing Council.
5. The borrower shall arrange to have the home they have purchased
inspected by a qualified inspector if both the home being purchased is over
10 years old and the CLTV is over 90%.
VI. Affordable Housing Limits
Affordable Housing Income Limits at 120% of Median
# of Persons in Family Limits
1 S34,500
2 S39,450
3 $44,350
4 $49,300
5 $53,250
6 $57,200
7 $61,150
8 $65,100
EXHIBIT
INCOME RANGE FOR QUAUFICATION - COURTSIDE CLASSICS
PRIOR TO ANY MCC ADJUSTMENT
Debt to Income Ratios Required
City o1 San Jacinto
Household Size
1
Est PITI
Housing Ratio
Overall Ratio
Add't Debt Allowed
PITI to Income
� 'Max 28% Mln / 38% Max
Total Debts to Income
"1 tf 38% Maximum Debt to Income
80% MEDIAN
INCOME INCOME
23,680 ; 29,600
1,973 ;° 2,487<
817: ``.' .. <817'
41% 399tr
38% 389b'
$0 $'1
20
120%
INCOME
35,520
2,960
817
289E
Household Size I(1COME j INCOME INCOME
2 27, 33,850 40,620
2,821 3,385
Est PITI ei7' 817 817
Housing Ratio 6%. 29% 24%
Overall Ratio % 38%
Add'I Debt Allowed 5255?,
Household Size COME INCOME INCOME
3 30, 38,050 45,660
,537 3,171 3,805
Est PIT! 817 817 817
Housing Ratio 2% 26% 21%
Overall Ratio 3 %
Add'i Debt Allowed $1
57
Household Size INCOME INCOME INCOME
4 $33,840 42,300 50,760
2,820 3,525 4.230
Est PITI 817 817 817
Housing Ratio 29% 23% 19%
Overall Ratio 38% 38% 38%
Add'I Debt Allowed $255
Household Size INCOME INCOME INCOME
5 $35,560 45,700 54,840
3,047 3,808 4,570
Est PITI 817 817 817
Housing Ratio 27% 21% 18%
Overall Ratio 38%
Add'I Debt Allowed $341
Household Size INCOME INCOME INCOME
6 39,240 49,050 58,860
3,270 4,088 4,905
Est PITI 817 817 817
Housing Ratio 25% 20% 17%
Overall Ratio 38%
Add'I Debt Allowed $426
Household Size INCOME INCOME INCOME
7 41,960 52,450 62,940
3,497 4,371 5,245
Est PITI 817 817 817
Housing Ratio 23% 19% 16%
Overall Ratio 98%
Add'I Debt Allowed 5512
Household Size
8
Est PITI
Housing Ratio
Overall Ratio
Add'I Debt Allowed
880 55,850 67,020
4,654 5,585
7: 817 817
18% 15%
$596
The shaded area represents
households that qualify for
the Down Payment Assistance
Program.
Those to the right of the
shaded area are disqualified
due to constraints the City
put into the program. These
same households would qualif,
with the proposed changes.
EXHIBIT "C"
Applicants whose gross annual income, as adjusted for family size, is between 0-80% of
the median income, must have a total monthly payment (PITI & PMI) which does not
exceed 33% of the applicant's gross monthly income. A Mortgage Credit Certificate
(MCC) from the County of Riverside may be used in conjunction with the Agency's down
payment assistance.
Applicants whose gross annual income, as adjusted for family size, is between 81%-120%
of the median income must have a total monthly payment (PITI & PMI) which does not
exceed 35% of the applicant's gross monthly income. A Mortgage Credit
Certificate (MCC) from the County of Riverside may be used in conjunction with the
Agency's down payment assistance.
d *��il +Y alfd]f 9 •
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: March 7, 1995
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING NORTH STATE STREET
UNDERGROUND DISTRICT #1
RECOMMENDATION
Close the public hearing and adopt a resolution establishing North State Street
Underground District #1.
DISCUSSION
As you recall the City is proposing to use its PUC Rule 20 underground funds, held in
trust by the Southern California Edison Company, to underground the utilities on State
Street between Ramona Blvd. and Idyllwild Drive.
No written objections have been received, although Inland Valley Cablevision has
requested permission to delay their portion of the undergrounding until early 1996, due
to lack of budget allocation. Staff has no objection to this, provided Inland Valley
Cablevision does their street crossings in the initial phase.
The estimated cost of this project is $300,000. The existing balance in the Rule 20
account is $356,400.
BKM:Ir CCRPT-95\Utility.Res
RESOLUTION NO.
ESTABLISHING NORTH STATE STREET
UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1
BE IT RESOLVED By the Council of the City of San Jacinto as follows:
WHEREAS, by Resolution No.95-3, a public hearing was called for February 21,
1995 and March 7, 1995, at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers in the City
Hall, of San Jacinto, California, to ascertain whether the public necessity, health, safety,
welfare requires the removal of poles, overhead structures and the underground
installation of wires and facilities for supplying electric, communication, or similar or
associated service on State Street, as shown on Exhibit "A"; and
WHEREAS, notice of such hearing has been given to all affected property owners
as shown on the last equalized assessment roll and utilities concerned in the manner and
for the time required by law; and
WHEREAS, such hearing has been duly and regularly held, and all persons
interested have been given an opportunity to be heard.
NOW, THEREFORE, Be it Resolved that the Council of the City of San Jacinto
hereby finds and determines that the public necessity, health, safety and welfare require
the removal of poles, overhead wires and associated structures, and the underground
installation of wires and facilities for supplying electric communication, or similar or
associated service on State Street as shown on Exhibit "A" and such described area is
hereby established as the North State Street Underground Utility District No. 1:
RESOLVED, FURTHER, that the Council finds: (use one or more of the following:)
(a) That such undergrounding will avoid or eliminate an unusually heavy
concentration of overhead electric facilities;
(b) The street or road right-of-way is extensively used by the general public and
carries a heavy volume of pedestrian or vehicular traffic;
RESOLVED, FURTHER, that all poles, overhead wires and associated overhead
structures shall be removed and underground installations made in said underground
utility district within the following times:
(a) Underground installation by utility companies and property owners and
reconnections not later than June 30, 1996;
(b) Removal of poles, overhead wires and other associated structures not later
than June 30, 1996;
RESOLVED, FURTHER, that the City Clerk, within ten (10) days after the adoption of
this resolution, shall mail a copy hereof and a copy of Chapter 12.28 of the Municipal
Code to affected property owners as such are shown on the last equalized assessment
roll and to the affected utilities.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of March, 1995.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Chairman
Secretary
CERTIFICATE
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No._ duly passed by the said
Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein.
Secretary
I-
w •• CCIC
( •• M
�. OP
F
s►
•
NORTH STATE STREET
UNDERGROUND DISTRICT #1
March 7, 1995
S
+ CT
` I lw J •IM= la.
•
—1
• L
,a OP P
•
•
•
• •
••• T•
II
II
it
I
II
II
II
II
I
II
II
11
I
I
II
II
1
I
II
I .It•• A
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
I
II
II
•
-CEH
,I.Iw ,1.T.
•
•
••• ••L••
.�•—st ..•:�
;
HIGHEST -PAID r EXECUTIVES
Public companies - ranked by cash compensation
Rank Comport.
MN Comports
Rank Adam, lel.dbrb
Cah
comP't
• 1K1
•
iiNaaaarde
Breadown
Pertenl
brrlb305
owned
k•
7IIM(41
Foiled'Foiled'urA
YartelvM
Percent
dung*
Deal
SUN
Bones
Number of shines
hold NOb eaepury
yes,
Jana R. U66
1. 1 Nslwd DAMN,Hearn labasbda 6a
4225 N, Spur., State 800, La J01082037
5560600
$1.500
51.697
(12)
$1 Mon
$500,000
300.000
Y Innpinta 1
44
pendent. CEO. dkeda
Deo N. tA'
ENCiS0.y
2. 5 Callaway 056
2265 RUadad Road, Carlsbad 92030 931.1771
51.025
S600
26
$335,000
$700.000
2.675,954
7.e p*a111
74
maMnal, CEO
Deo 31, ten
Da. 31.IW
David i Fea1�1
3. 14 4 25 Eo Heal tam8400., s Inc.
4225 Fi.psa Spa., Sdr cam La JoY 9M37
56oa6g
8308
1532
71
1501A8T
$400,020
138.731
kiss
47
a 0asa
'Mann$509203
'Mann A- Pepe
4. 2 San Oboe Gas AElwtfc Co.
POeoa 11131,San Demo 92112 606200
$846
1751
l3
1337.000
150623
W than t
pecan
60
Woman. CEO
Dec. 01,1511
Dec31.I1
David IL Dye
5. 22 CelenyGd
MI6 6dslad Road. Cabbed 0038 931.1771
$750
$450
67
5260.0543
1600.000
225630
Ma Pent
51
peddaa,ded annelnp oaal
Da. 31.19e
Pie
Raba a Taylor
6. 11 %ds Cop.
9380 Cana Pere OM., San Mips 92121 6253300
$725
$412
76
9220.003
5505,000
560286
1.1
46
Manton, CEO. saaebay
Dec31,190
E61019esd
$710
$751
(51
1457.50)
1262810
66.101
lea Inn
52
maw*.83I t
13r.8a1ad
7 Naked Hes611abaabd_
42mbup/a apse, Sae a00, V Ma NW
5660900
Brun Prey
8. 16 Calaway cob
2265 Rt6r5r6 Road, Carlsbad 92008 931.1771
1764
1525
34
$254.000
Sa50.000
294.661
less 1
39
sena ea a
Deo3l. IPA
,IOIMlklbbbba
AmR.6dras Wire;Cap.
B 11355 N. Raw MaRad,LaJde 67031
6724000
$697
UMs.
11
1300.000
1360,257
139.765
12
46
CEO, prddrlkdadmen
Da.31.116
Pre M.Peckna
12 4365 EaeN6. Subs 900, San Pop92121
10. laaoaa Pam n Orly
622.7600
6653
14.92
51
$263250
9ag66a
61.140
lass than 1
Pit
12
duim=
Dee 31. Ica
Not BSD. Mons
11 • Ust 9on 36 Card Pare Dn a. San Mop 92121 @ .3300
$630
9334
60
612E000
1606300
166162
lea Oa11
percpercentc
46
do pnddatof sales
Dec.31.Ica
W. MeldSMurreOb
12. 10 Nand Heals laboratories Inc
4225 EsSmarr Sea BOO. Smarr B00. La Job 92037
5500600
$647
$5'n
14
A24.615
f262500
71,Rfl
less than dl
49
resat., vin eodpresOrd
Dec. JI,Ica
GDuo,$50
Calaway
13. zt 9wnGm
22d5 Ru6sMN Rod. Carlsbad 9x06 931.1771
$4so
35
1704000
1400.OD0
3221r46
pa Tan 1
word
63
Kola uaa*,Ma P
(Held mrede
Dec 31,lr
RldwdCwaesMlb!
Carney 14. 15 Gdl
2205 RUhedo.d Road, Carlsbad 92038 931.1771
SaeII
1525
1200.000
f400.000
750.000
22
52
5811021' .v Win10
,
DecDes 311
Sa2130,151
James A. BMey
15. 20 BraOkb.. Cap.
0666 Scranton Rod. San Diego 62121 452.7550
$599
$365
69
$252616
9347,2:4
56012
35
47
Oulmwlpet10rR CEO
Not T1molny J. Brodal
16. of Naeoalwallh abomnden Inc
4235 Eso2auc . Sae. Sm. 600. La .lob 92037
List 5500600
1589
K62
22
$325.000
$262,500
69.633
less thanpermed1
42
.Bala rim pred4rd
Dec.3i.190
WMMt J. bble
17. a code Corp.
9333 Babes Ara. P.O. Ira a5567. San DIa9a was
2726710
1562
wse
(121
9506.710
175,050
2454,191
40.33
76
Oran. pa1drn CEO
Sept30, is
E. Meant$480.000
Not Gary Meant
18. on Cada Golf No
Lad 1112 Aston Ave . Carlsbad 92005 923.0377
WA
1510
11
S84.e00
1.549,739
16.9
59
tndnran
Dec. 31.101
Jack W.Ooedel
19. 4 Foot bile kb
0330&boa Ave.. San Olepo 92123 571.2121
1563
$678
ten)
8510077
961617
2.5
55
dolmens CEO,Pm3Mrt
C131P0
Na Gerald E Fora
20. on Pyd. Corp.
LW 9380 Carrot Pak Drive, San Geld 92121 625-3300
9562
$244
130
$141,000
$420.810
t22.515
less 0an1
47
padre. dad opening orlon
Doc31,101
Pad
Ansel IL 1ubbd
NotJ0 Gsap kla
21. 9710 Sarbn Rod, SW 100. Sal Dim 92121
List 4501X155
5542
37
1276.000
Qa7,027
696.053
10.7
56
chairman. CEO
Dec 31, is
J45051:3619
22. 17 Jensen' Gap Nc
455 Mame New Ave, SUM 300, Del Mar 92014
259-7000
5500
SHOD
0
5500.000
16.312500
5221
61
51n00. CEO
June 30. I@
SidCraig
23. Is Awry Craig Ire.
655 Markle 'Am Ave., S10300, Ds Mr92014
259.7000
1500
$500
0
9500,000
16,311500
6321
II
vim dltkna l
in,,. 30,190
Gay T. Barber.
Nol
a I5622 Bernardo CDove. San Dego 92127
24 MAW Inc Cater
Ust 592.0404
$500
9773
50
52111.700
1216.600
401.654
2.4
5e
CEO. preside -IL draw
Dec. 31.190
Ralph W. Bocka
Nat
25. an MaeMarvPour Co.
4365 Eno*, GNe Sub KO, Sal Ono 92121
LW 522.750D
$4961
n4
NA
5206.731
5299.685
15.000
Men bun 1
percent
60
prndrE CEO, damn
Dec.31
In the can or aK. manna are rar1.O alpabet y. 'Ben et began Ns endonnan loth Magma in 1993.
'Cash o.npasalon In nob rasa Nadu saary end anuses. Sown: Company posy statements.NA Not &Wadable It es able neon 610a List b*Morn Ma p 0Satsmn anp'y Su ammpag3 sane*ramend arr Indenter its 0eak4
m Na naiads Researched by Lisa Marshal
5tl ad Jamb Crabs re bothbaw6db owners* tholesnag. Originally published Sept. 19, 1991
Ada._. ti i`a . 1
�~
1a A N
'JACINTO
TO:
Staff Report
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Les Evans, Public Works Director
Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: March 7, 1995
RE: COUNTY SERVICES AREA (CSA) 152 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
CONTRACT NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION
SYSTEM (NPDES) AND RESOLUTION SETTING RATES FOR THE
COUNTY SERVICE AREA
Recommendation:
1. Approve the Administrative Services Agreement between Riverside County and
the City of San Jacinto, which will enable the County to formally assess and
collect City CSA 152 parcel charges and revenue for the NPDES program.
2. Adopt Resolution No. Setting the Rates for County Service Area (CSA) 152
to Fund City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit
Program.
Fiscal Impact:
The proposed total budget for the FY 1995-96 NPDES Permit Program is $46,630.
Included in this amount is the County Annual Administrative charge which is 6% of City
CSA revenue or $2,640.00. Also included is the cost to form the District which will be
approximately $9,940.00. These funds can be recouped through the CSA assessment.
NPDES/CSA 152
Page Two
March 7, 1995
Background:
At their February 21, 1995 meeting, the City Council tabled the Agreement and
Resolution, pending a report from the City Attorney on the ramification of non-compliance
with the NPDES legislation. The City Attorney will report that non-compliance is
punishable by fines of up to $25,000 a day and "willful" non-compliance is subject to civil
and criminal penalties. Staff recommends that the City Council comply with the NPDES
regulations.
On September 6, 1994, the City Council approved a Resolution making application to the
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) for the annexation of the City to County
Service Area 152. That annexation was approved by the County Board of Supervisors
on December 6, 1994. The next step is to form the District and establish assessments.
The regulations which require a storm water management program originated in 1987,
when Congress enacted the Water Quality Act which amended portions of the Clean
Water Act (CWA). Section 402 (p) of the CWA requires that the EPA establish
regulations setting forth a program of NPDES applications and corresponding permits for
storm water discharges from industrial sources and municipal separate storm drain
systems. EPA published its draft regulations in December 1989 for review and
comment. The Final Rule for NPDES Permit Application Regulations for Storm Water
Discharges was published on November 1, 1990. The Rule specifies who is covered by
the regulations; prescribes a variety of required information -gathering, planning, and
reporting activities; and sets forth a schedule for compliance with the two-part permit
application requirements. The Rule also sets forth specific application requirements for
identified industries.
Under these rules, the City of San Jacinto is required to institute a program to protect
the environment from contaminated storm water run-off. This program will include
increased monitoring, cleaning and inspection of drainage facilities. Revenue to offset
the cost of the NPDES Program has been provided through CSA 152 for many Riverside
County cities.
NPDES/CSA 152
Page Three
March 7, 1995
So far the cost of implementation of the program has not been high. A summary of
present charges by other Agencies in CSA 152 is shown below:
CSA 152 Annual Assessment
No. of BAU's Proj. Revenue
Banning $ 4.72 12,632 $ 59,649
Cathedral City 8.48 23,852 167,000
Corona 5.82 38,145 222,000
Desert Hot Springs 1.57 6,998 10,951
Indio 0.00 23,518 -0-
La Quinta 9.99 15,039 105,000
Moreno Valley 1.55 47,043 73,000
Murrieta 10.00 13,087 131,010
Norco 5.78 8,637 49,861
Palm Desert 0.00 32,570 -0-
Palm Springs 9.50 35,435 336,792
Rancho Mirage 4.68 19,602 68,000
Riverside 2.83 95,865 271,287
Coachella 0.00 10,479 -0-
San Jacinto (Proposed) 4.26 10,950 46,630
Proposed Assessments are confirmed by cities and recommended to the County for
approval. Rates are for a single family residential parcel which is equal to one (1)
Benefit Assessment Unit (BAU). Other parcel assessments will vary with land use, size
of parcel and relative stormwater runoff potential. Vacant, undeveloped and agriculture
parcels are excluded.
The County has determined that there are 10,950 BAUs in the City of San Jacinto. City
staff has prepared a preliminary budget of $46,630 which describes a minimal NPDES
Program for the City for 1995-96. The program of work can be seen in Attachment "A:
to this staff report.
The preliminary budget is also attached. The cost of forming the assessment district and
the County's annual administrative fee for administering the CSA totals $12,580.00.
If the City Council approves the Administrative Services Agreement and adopts the
Resolution setting a rate to fund the NPDES Program, the County of Riverside will
prepare the required reports, notice property owners and hold the necessary public
hearings. The City Council may revise the proposed budget and assessment rate at any
time up to final approval by the County Board of Supervisors. This approval will
probably occur in June, 1995.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
'4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR CSA 152 PROGRAM
BETWEEN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY AND CITY OF SAN JACINTO
This Agreement, entered into as of this day of 1995 by the
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, hereinafter called "COUNTY", and the CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, hereinafter called "CITY", establishes the responsibilities and obligations of each
party concerning the management and financing of COUNTY SERVICE AREA 152,
hereinafter called "CSA 152".
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Congress in 1987 added Section 402(p) to the Federal Clean Water Act
(CWA) [33 U.S.C. 1342(p)]; and,
WHEREAS, Section 402(p) requires certain municipalities, construction and
industrial facilities to obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit before discharging stormwater into the waters of the United States; and,
WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY have obtained or will obtain a municipal NPDES
Permit for each of the three watersheds of the County; and,
WHEREAS, COUNTY has formed CSA 152 to finance a portion of its programs and
obligations associated with the municipal NPDES Permits and individual General NPDES
Permits; and,
WHEREAS, cooperation between COUNTY and CITY in the administration and
implementation of the NPDES Permits is in the best interests of COUNTY and CITY; and,
WHEREAS, CITY was formally annexed into CSA 152 by COUNTY Resolution No.
94-411 on December 6, 1994; and,
WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY are to perform certain duties prescribed in this
1
4
5
6
7
8
Agreement that will benefit all parties;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:
1. DELEGATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES. The responsibilities of each party shall be
as follows:
A. COUNTY shall assume the responsibilities and meet the requirements
of CSA 152 administration for COUNTY and CITY by:
(1) Preparing CSA 152 budget and reports in compliance with County
Ordinance No. 573.
9 (2) COUNTY also shall:
10 (a) Prepare the required narrative for said budget and reports
11 along with COUNTY'S individual budget or report on COUNTY
12 activities.
13 (b) Annually prepare and forward to the appropriate agency computer
14 tape information on individual assessments of parcels within CITY for
15 generation of Benefit Assessment Units (BAU) totals and assessments
16 for CITY.
17 (c) Forward CITY corrections to assessments and tax bills to Auditor-
18 Controller/Tax Collector.
19 (d) Review and coordinate CITY CSA 152 budget with overall
20 CSA 152 budget.
21 (e) Reimburse CITY for actual expenditures incurred under provision
22 of approved CITY CSA 152 budget and allocations.
23 (f) Conduct mailing of proposed tax rate assessment for CITY for FY
24 94/95 and any year CITY requires notices. COUNTY shall bill CITY
25 for these services at cost.
26 (g) Provide to CITY annual property assessment printouts and a BAU
27
28 2
1
1 summary.
(h) Provide to CITY standardized forms including but not limited
3 to assessment re-evaluation forms, budget and expense reimbursement
4 formats.
5 (i) Serve as administrative and technical advisor on CSA budget
6 preparation and assessment re-evaluations.
7 (j) Assess CITY an annual six percent (6%) administrative fee on new
8 revenue for CITY CSA 152 budget.
9 (k) Be responsible to CITY for reasonable requests by CITY for
10 information, billing tapes, data, changes, corrections, refunds, issuances
11 ! of new CITY tax bills or revisions. Said requests will be at expense of
12 CITY.
13 (1) Conduct annual County public budget hearing of CSA 152.
(m) Assist CITY with first year CITY information workshop on
15 NPDES program and CSA 152 administration by providing
16 administrative and technical guidance.
17 (n) Provide CITY with copy of CSA 152 budget prior to
18 submittal to COUNTY Board of Supervisors.
19 B. CITY shall assume the responsibilities and meet the requirements of CSA 152
20 administration for CITY by:
21 (1) Preparing CITY CSA 152 budget and reports on its activities using
22 COUNTY format, hereto attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein
23 by reference. Said budget and reports shall be submitted to COUNTY for
24 incorporation with COUNTY CSA 152 budget narrative and in accordance
25 with Schedule of Events, hereto attached as FYhibit B and incorporated herein
26 by reference.
3
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(2) CITY shall also:
(a) Conduct NPDES and CSA 152 public forum for CITY constituents
prior to COUNTY CSA 152 public hearing for new or increased CSA
152 assessment over prior fiscal year assessment.
(b) Be responsible for CITY updates, corrections or revisions to be
entered into COUNTY data base for CSA 152 or any corrections,
revisions, refunds or issuance of new CITY tax bills through
COUNTY at CITY expense.
(c) Be responsible to COUNTY for any proposed tax assessment
printing and/or mailings CITY may want COUNTY to perform at
CITY expense.
(d) Be responsible for replies to CITY taxpayer inquiries and
requests for CITY CSA 152 budget information and NPDES Program
within CITY boundaries.
(e) Provide COUNTY with CITY telephone numbers and public forum
dates for CITY taxpayer inquiries on CITY CSA 152 program and for
inclusion on CITY CSA 152 assessment mailings or proposed
assessment increases by February 15 of each year, and keep such
numbers updated as necessary.
2. FEES AND PAYMENT. COUNTY shall administer CSA 152 for the benefit of
COUNTY and CITY. CITY share of annual CSA 152 administration shall be a six percent
(6%) fee of CITY CSA 152 annual budget.
A. CITY shall be responsible for payment to COUNTY, at cost, for services that
require:
(1) COUNTY to provide information, billings tapes, data changes, corrections,
refunds, issuances of new CITY tax or revisions to CITY. COUNTY shall
4
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
'4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
.7
28
provide an itemized billing of completed work to CITY.
(2) COUNTY to perform printing and/or mailing of proposed tax assessment
rates of CITY assessed parcel numbers.
3. SHARE OF COSTS. In the event CSA 152 requires the services of a consultant, as
mutually determined by COUNTY and CITY, to prepare manuals and/or perform studies
such as, but not limited to, rrjjigement audits and fiscal reports that are relevant to the
entire CSA 152 boundary, the cost of said consultant services will be shared by COUNTY
and CITY using the methodology of this Section.
A. Share of Cost Methodology. The individual percentage contribution from
COUNTY and CITY shall be a function of population. Contribution shall be calculated as
the population of COUNTY or CITY, divided by the aggregate total population of all CSA
152 members, thusly:
(1) Contribution (%) = Xn/Xt
Xn = population of COUNTY or CITY
Xt = total population of all CSA 152 members combined.
(2) The population of COUNTY, CITY and CSA 152 member cities will be
based on the latest California State Department of Finance population figures
issued in May of each year.
B. COUNTY shall keep CITY apprised and notified of COUNTY requests for
proposal (RFP), selection of consultant, consultant's fee, any contract timetables and
consultant schedule of payments.
4. TERM OF AGREEMENT. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date
the last duly authorized representative of COUNTY or CITY executes it. The term of the
agreement shall be indefinite or as long as required for the Clean Water Act.
5. WITHDRAWAL FROM AGREEMENT. Either Party may withdraw from this
Agreement thirty (30) days after giving written notice to other Party. In event withdrawal
5
1 becomes effective, withdrawal shall constitute forfeiture by the withdrawing party of its share
2 of costs and administrative fees paid as described in Sections 2 and 3 of this Agreement up
3 to the effective date of withdrawal. The withdrawing party shall be responsible for all
4 lawfully assessed penalties as a consequence of withdrawal.
5 6. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENT. This Agreement may be amended by
6 mutual consent of the parties to the Agreement. No amendment to this Agreement shall
7 be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the duly authorized representatives of the
8 parties.
9 7. NOTICES. All notices shall be deemed duly given when delivered by hand; or five (5)
10 days after deposit in the U. S. mail, postage prepaid.
11 8. GOVERNING LAW. This Agreement will be governed and construed in accordance
12 with laws of the United States and the State of California. If any provision or provisions
13 of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality
14 and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired
15 hereby.
16 9. CONSENT TO BREACH NOT A WAIVER. No term or provision hereof shall be
17 deemed waived and no breach excused, unless such waiver or consent is in writing and
18 signed by the party so waiving or consenting. Any consent by any party to, or waiver of, a
19 breach by the other party, whether expressed or implied, shall not constitute a consent to,
20 waiver of, or excuse for any other different or subsequent breach.
21 10. APPLICABILITY OF PRIOR AGREEMENTS. This Agreement and the Exhibits
22 attached hereto constitute the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the
23 subject matter; all CSA 152 prior agreements, representations, statements, negotiations and
24 understandings are superseded hereby.
25 11. HOLD HARMLESS. Each Party shall indemnify and hold harmless the other party
26 from liability or damages resulting from its own acts or omissions including those of its
27
28 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1.4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2.7
28
officers or employees in the performance of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed as of the day and year first
above written.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
By
Form Approved
County Counsel
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
Mayor
City Manager
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
BY on behalf of CSA 152
Deputy
ATTEST:
Gerald A. Maloney
Clerk of the Board
By
Deputy
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
7
CITY OF SAN JACITO CSA 152 (NPDES)
FY 1995-96
APPROPRIATIONS**
Storm Drainage System Inspection
Video inspection of all underground
Storm Drain pipe 36" in diameter and
larger - 15,000 LF @ $0.35/LF
Water Quality Testing
$ 5,250
-0-
Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP)
Implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Inspection Forms for Building/Public
Works Inspectors 500
Additional Catch Basin & Storm Drain Maint. 10,000
Additional Street Sweeping in Industrial/
Commercial/Central Business Areas
(10 hours per month) 7,800
Administration of Volunteer Catch Basin
Basin Stenciling -0-
Development of Grading Ordinance -0-
Develop BMP Manual for new Development -0-
Inspection of Construction Sites for
Compliance of Grading Ordinance -0-
Testing of Sediment in Sediment Basin -0-
Spot Inspection of Commercial/Industrial
Areas for Illegal Dumping -0-
Education
Pesticide Training for City Personnel -0-
Permit Training Requirements for Inspectors
Plan Checkers, Engineers & Planners 500
Training for Review/Inspection of BMP and
Inspection for Illegal Dumping -0-
Utility Bill Inserts with information on
Impacts of Fuel Spills, Illegal
Dumping, Erosion, etc. -0-
Exhibit
'A'
Page 2 - CSA 152 (NPDES) Budget Format Exhibit 'A'
Administration of NPDES Permit
Attendance at monthly meetings, preparation
of annual report, budgets, contract
administration, etc.
$ 10,000
County Charge for the Formation of District - First Year
Legal Mailings 3,640
Assessor Line Item Charge 3,640
Riverside County Flood Control BAU computer time 2,100
Printing 560
SUB -TOTAL
CSA 152 Administration Fee (6%)
TOTAL PROJECTED APPROPRIATIONS
$ 43,990
2,640
$ 46,630
CSA 152 EDIT B
SCHEDULE OF EVENTS *
January
2 Cities and County begin CSA 152/NPDES budget process for upcoming
fiscal year.
15 County provides updated BAU summary to first year CSA 152 Cities.
20 County provides statement of accounts to each City for first tax collection
period of fiscal year (December). Statement reflects year to date CSA 152
revenue collected from each City and its zone of benefit (incorporated city
boundaries).
30 City prepares and submits to County a statement of expenses for City
CSA 152/NPDES program.
February
March
April
10 County receives expense statement of Cities and effects reimbursement to
Cities. Reimbursement is limited to the amount of City CSA 152 revenue
collected less County expenses as outlined in CSA 152 agreement. County
shall submit to City on a quarterly basis County expenses for inclusion in
City expense statement.
15 Deadline for City to notify County of proposed increase in City CSA 152
assessment rate.
1 Cities and County finalize individual CSA 152 budgets and proposed BAU
assessment rates.
10 Deadline for first year CSA Cities or Cities with CSA rate increase to
submit information for CSA legal mailing of estimated assessments.
Required information includes times, dates, appropriate addresses of public
forum/offices including phone numbers and proposed BAU rate of City.
15 City CSA 152 budgets due to County for consolidation of overall CSA 152
budget.
15 County conducts BAU computer and print services of CSA legal mailings
for first year CSA Cities and Cities with rate increases.
1 County submits total CSA 152 budget for review and inclusion into overall
County Budget.
10 Legal mailing date for estimated assessments on parcels for any new or
proposed increases in City CSA 152 rates. County provides list of assessor
parcel numbers and estimated assessments to those CSA Cities with
new/increased rates.
10 Second installment of taxes/assessments due.
Page 2 - CSA 152 Schedule of Events EXHIBIT B
May
1
10
15
20
June/July
County provides Cities with second statement of accounts for year to date
City CSA 152 revenue collected.
Cities prepare and submit statement of expenses for reimbursement of
CSA 152/NPDES program costs. -
Cities with proposed increased CSA 152 assessments over the current year
hold public forums to address City constituents and questions.
County reviews/approves expense statement of Cities and effects
reimbursement to Cities.
County Board of Supervisors conducts public hearings on CSA assessments
rates including CSA 152 rates or proposed rate increases. Changes may
occur to CSA rates at discretion of Board.
July
15 Reconciliation of statement of accounts for County and each CSA 152 City
(zone of benefit). Balanced statement reflects total revenue collected for
prior fiscal year. Cities may apply for balance to cover reimbursement
of underfunded City NPDES expenses or balance is carried forward into
next fiscal year within CSA 152 City account (zone of benefit).
July/August County Board approves final County budget including CSA budgets.
Budgets may change at the discretion of the Board.
September
October
15
First County and City tax/assessments bills of the fiscal year are mailed.
Cities provided with update BAU summary and list of assessor parcel
numbers and actual assessments.
October Cities respond to taxpayer requests for parcel re -assessments or
re-evaluations and forward recommendations and corrections to County.
November
1 City provides BAU and assessor parcel corrections to County for
updating in file.
December
10 First installment of taxes and assessments due/collected by County for
current fiscal year.
* Use schedule for CSA 152 planning purposes.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA SETTING THE
RATES FOR COUNTY SERVICE AREA 152 - SAN JACINTO TO
FUND CITY'S NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION
SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the County of Riverside, by its Resolution No. 94-411 adopted
December 6, 1994, annexed the City of San Jacinto to its County Service Area (CSA)
152 at the City's request to the Environmental Protection Agency's requirement to obtain
operating permits for discharges from storm drain systems and to pay for anticipated
project costs that places an assessment on property owners' tax bills to fund
expenditures required by the permit; and
WHEREAS, City staff has estimated the stormwater management program
requirements will cost the City approximately $46,630.00;
WHEREAS, a typical benefit assessment unit would be a single family residential
lot, and large residential and commercial/industrial parcels would be assigned several
benefitting units, depending on the parcel(s) size and runoff. Agricultural land and
vacant, undeveloped parcels would produce no urban pollutants and would be exempt
from any assessment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined, based on staffs calculations, that
annual assessments are anticipated to be $4.26 per Benefit Assessment Unit;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto that the annual assessment rate for fiscal year 1995-96 for CSA 152 - San
Jacinto is hereby set at $4.26 per Benefit Assessment Unit.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto on this day of , 1995 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Henry C. Hafliger, Mayor
City of San Jacinto
ATTEST:
Bob Wilson, City Clerk
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
STAFF REPORT
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
March 7, 1995
RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING TO HEAR PROTESTS AND
OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND ACCOUNT AFTER DEMOLITION
OF THE LAS BRISAS MODELS
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt resolution setting hearing for April 4, 1995 to consider objections and protests to
the demolition costs of the Las Brisas Models.
DISCUSSION
The demolition of the Las Brisas Models is now complete. The costs incurred by the City
were $31,000 in demolition costs and $1,500 in administrative costs.
ZR,
The Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings requires a public hearing
to be held to allow the challenge of those costs. Ultimately, the Council will have to
decide the way it desires to attempt to recover the costs. The choices will be reviewed
in the memo for the public hearing.
The cost incurred by the City were for the demolition of the four model homes of the tract
known as Las Brisas. The models were located on Assessor's Parcel #433-030-025.
This parcel has a legal description as per attached Exhibit "A".
The City administrative costs incurred involved the Staff and City Attorney costs in
researching the regulations; sending appropriate notices; posting the property; phone
conversations with the property owner; soliciting bids; recordation fees, etc.
The property owner, Damon Investment Co., A California Corporation, will be noticed of
the meeting and the property will be posted. Additionally, the developer of Las Brisas,
D. P. Seiersen, will be notified.
On November 1, 1994, the Council authorized the demolition of these buildings. Funding
for this is a loan from traffic signal mitigation to the General Fund.
BKM:Ir CCRPT-95\LasBrisa
EXHIBIT "A"
That portion of Lot 114 of the lands of the San Jacinto Land
Association, in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside,
State of California, as per Map recorded in Book 8 page 357 of
Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County,
more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of the South 40 acres of said
Lot 114; said Northeast corner also being a point in the center
line of State Highway 79; thence South 89°45'07" West 55 feet
along the North line of said South 40 acres to a point in a line
parallel with and 55 feet Westerly, measured at right angles,
from said center line of State Highway 79; said point being the
true point of beginning; thence along said parallel line, South
0°15'03" East 308.99 feet; thence South 89°44'57" West 150 feet;
thence North 0°15'03" West 94.01 feet to the beginning of a
tangent curve concave Southeasterly and having a radius of 50
feet; thence Northeasterly along said curve, through a central
angle of 40°32'09" an arc length of 35.38 feet to a point of
reverse with a curve concave Westerly and having a radius of 50
feet; a radial line of said curves through said point of reverse
bears North 49°42'54" West; thence Northerly along said reverse
curve through a central angle of 106°56'26" an arc length of
93.32 feet; thence North 25°49'38" East 115.98 feet to a point in
said North line of the South 40 acres, distant thereon South
89°45107" West 105 feet from the true point of beginning; thence
along said North line North 89°45'07" East 205 feet to the true
point of beginning.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY
OF BAN JACINTO SETTING NEARING FOR PROTESTS
OR OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND ACCOUNT AFTER
DEMOLITION PURSUANT TO THE UNIFORM CODE FOR
ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS
Recitals:
WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto has previously commenced
proceedings for the abatement of dangerous buildings located upon
the property described as Assessors Parcel Number 433-030-025 and
more particularly described in the attached legal description.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Uniform Code for the Abatement
of Dangerous Buildings, a Notice and Order for Abatement was duly
posted and served upon the property owner. No appeal of the
Notice and Order was requested by the property owner and the
property owner has sent written consent to the ordered abatement;
and
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has caused the abatement of
the condition and has presented his report and account of the
expenses incurred therefor, said report claiming recompensable
expenses of $31,000.00.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO AS FOLLOWS:
1. Setting of Hearing: A hearing shall be held before the City
Council of the City of San Jacinto wherein the Report and Account
of the Public Works Director shall be considered, together with
any protests or objections thereto. The hearing shall be held on
Aril 4� 1995. at 7;30 PM, or as soon thereafter that evening as
the matter may be heard. The hearing shall be held at the San
Jacinto Community Center located at 625 S. Pico, San Jacinto.
California 92583. All interested persons may appear and be
heard.
2. Notices: Notices of the hearing shall be made by the City
Clerk and shall be posted upon the property involved, published
once in a newspaper of general circulation in this jurisdiction,
and sent by certified mail postage prepaid to the owner of record
as shown on the last equalized assessment roll or as known by the
Clerk. All notices to be made at least 10 days prior to the
hearing. At the hearing, the City Council will consider and pass
upon the Director's report and any protests or objections
properly received.
3. protests: Any person interested in or affected by the
proposed charge may file written protests or objections with the
City Clerk, 312 East Main Street, San Jacinto, California 92583,
at any time prior to the time set for the hearing on the report.
Each such protest or objection must contain a description of the
property in which the signer thereof is interested and the
grounds of such protest or objection. The Clerk shall endorse on
every such protest or objection the date of receipt.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of March, 1995, on the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
2
1
S A N
Staff Report
JACINTO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Pamela S. Easter
DATE: March 7, 1995
RE: REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF BONNIE STONE'S AIRFARE
Mr. Lorin Bristol, Treasurer of Rancho Viejo Estates, has submitted the attached letter
requesting that the San Jacinto City Council consider reimbursing Bonnie Stone for her
airfare for a recent Washington, D.C. trip on the Senior Housing issue. The requested
reimbursement amount is $369.00.
We do not have any funds included in the City budget to cover expenses related to the
Senior Housing issue. Funds would need to be appropriated from other sources, i.e.
unexpended funds in the Community Promotions account. Anna has advised that we
have $3,500 available in General Fund 10-2550-425 - Account 3625 (Community
Promotions).
Attachment
• f•
C
•
Feb. 26, 1995
600 Porterfield Dr.
San Jacinto, Ca 92582
Henry C. Hafliger, Mayor
City ❑f San Jacinto, Ca.
Dear sir;
Enclosed is an excerpt from the mobile Homes Courier
which outlines the activities of Bonnie Stone, who is president
of Rancho Viejo mobile Homes Estates, a development just
south of the De Aoza Elememtary School. This development was
offered as a Seniors only Tract, but HUD thinks differently.
In fact, we have a law suit pending by HUD.
Your Cottonwood Estates is in the same predicament. Not
only that, but several tracts in Hemet have the same problem.
The City of Hemet was concerned enough to send their mayor
Marge Tandy and council woman Lori Van Arsdale back to 'washington
to lobby for relief. Bonnie Stone, who is also president of
Citizens for Senior Housino, was invited to op along. The air
fare for one person was 'L1,000.00. The City of Hemet used it's
influence to get reduced fares of 5369.00. The City of Hemet
paid the fares of Tandy and Van Arsdale but Bonnie Stone had to
pay her own fare. The City of Hemet did pick up the tab for the
hotel bill and taxi fares for the three women.
Inasmuch assenior housing is a recognizable part of
San Jacinto, I think that it would show San Jacinto's support
of Bonnie Stone's efforts by at least payino her air fare to
washington, D.C.
Sincerely yours
Lorin U. Bristol, Treas.
Rancho Viejo Estates
Suite
--
Hemet. qs 92544
(909) 652.e.Rxr -77
Each agency is Incependenhv owned and oceratec.
Valley Trave
!!
STONE/BONNIE
CITY OF HEMET
450 E LATHAM
HEMET CA 92543
399aa
25 JAN 95 - WEDNESDAY
6 UNITED I~, , cH. i Ass
. LV: CNTARIL CA~ u700A NONSTOP CONFIRMED
AR: IHICAGO/OHARE 1246E
BREAKFAST -AUDIO . SEAT-22C
UNITED ,1, COACH CLASS
LV: CHICACCZOHARE 215E NONSTOP
AR: WASHZNATION A- 459+
AUJI0
SEATS UNDER AIRPORT CONTROL PLEASE CHECK AT COUNTER FOR
PREFERRED SEATING
CONFIRMED
'28 JAN 25 - SATURDAY
. UNITED 607 COACH CLASS
LV: WASH/NATICNA. 1000A NONSTOP CONFIRMED
AR: CHICAGO/OHARE 1103A
SEAT-10D
UNITED 437 COACH CLASS
LV: CHICAGO/OHARE 12a5P NONSTOP CONFIRMED
AR: ONTARIO CA 256P
LUNCH -AUDIO SEAT-12c
7-248LUE LINE PHONE 800-526-S08S UST CnDE ABZ:
•UNIOLOBE VALLEY TRAVEL IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR
,THE ACTIONS OR NEGLIGENCE OF ANY SUPPLIERS.
TICKET NUMBERZS:
STONE/BONNIE
AIR TRANSPORTATION
14950a0724 CHECK
324.55 TAX 44.45 TTL
SUB TOTAL
AMOUNT DUE
s39.00
369.00
JAN 20 1993 WE APPRECIATE YOUR BUSINESS.
uriCJ
.g South Riverside County Mobile Home Communities and Seniors since 1993 Vol. 2, No. 15
MOBIIE HOES
g Distance Grandparenting
A DUKE & JOAN MITRIC
closeness that saved Jack Shad -
While he, his wife and his son, a
enjoying an outing riding all-ter-
Shadduck soared over a cliff and
ie ground marry feet below.
on ran to his father and found him
:rid his heart stopped. Phil imme-
cardiopulmonary recusitation.
.on and his son are today enjoying
they can get
part of the story is that Shadduck's
,is two year old grandson live 3,000
Durham, N.C.
of other long-distance grandpar-
.adduck and his wife Helen try to
despite the distance.
luck's have four children, two who
. and the others in Escondido and
orally, they said, they are closer to
3children nearer their Hemet home.
ose family, always have been," said
d Long Beach policeman who cur-
te investigations. But distance
tight knit.
ave as close a family relationship as
said regarding his far away son,
,w and grandchild.
adducks instinctively follow all the
aid out by experts in long distance
•ihaber, a child psychiatrist and
• ral books on uraidparenting, pre -
messages.
Also, Kornhaber recommends that grandpar-
ents urge grandchildren to send tapes, videos of
special moments, drawings and even the baby -
teeth the children have shed.
The Shadducks send videos of family gather-
ings to their grandson in Durham. Ile watches
them with his parents and points out all his aunts
and uncles, cousins and grandparents. When he
sees them in person he then easily recognizes
them, Helen said.
Helen and Jack see their Hemet grandchild two
to three times a month. They see their Escondido
grandchild two to three times a month and see
their North Carolina grandchild two to three
times a year.
They send letters and cards to North Carolina
and keep up, as well as they can, with their
grandson's day-to-day life. With all the various
kinds of contact they maintain they feel that the
relationship is as good as it can be.
"When we call him, he relates to us and he'll
call me grandpa. He recognizes my voice," Jack
said. And, as soon as they are reunited, the
Shadduck's grandson "is just as forthcoming as
the other kids."
The Shadducks enjoy doing things with their
grandchildren like cooking and let even the
youngest (the two year old from Durham) partici-
pate. Cooking is a favorite activity.
"I put aprons on all the little kids," Helen said.
Then they do things the kids like to do, like
color.
Fight to save
senior
housing
continues
Local politicians
return from D.C.
optimistic HUD
rules may be
revised
By TONY AULT
',emet Mayor Marge Tandy,
Councilwoman Lori Van
Arsdale and senior housing
activist Bonnie Stone returned
from Washington D.C. this week
optimistic their efforts to revise
federal fair housing rules threa-
tening seniors only communities
were paying off.
Stone, President of the Citizens
for Senior Housing organization
in Hemet, on the suggestion of
Councilwoman Van Arsdale
accompanied Mayor 'Tandy to
the nation's Capitol last week to
again meet with Assistant
Secretary of Housing and Urban
Development Roberta
Achtenhurg, her staff, and sym-
pathetic senators toward revis-
ing or eliminating HUD rules on
requirements threatening many
"seniors only" mobile home
parks and subdivisions.
Van Arsdale said, "Weot their
ei"If was very positive," after
meetings with Achtenburg, Rep.
Bonny Bono (R-Palm Springs),
and the assistants to Sen. Di e
ei - i .,, Sen. Barbara
Boxer (D-Calif.), Sen. John
McCain (R-Ariza. Sen. Bo)Z
rackwood (RiOre.), Clay Shaw
(R—Fla.) and Slade Go o
Wash.). While Tandy went with
Stone and Van Arsdale she
attended a annual national
Please see Housing on page 2.
Join
golden Coach
Mobite Estates
alvv
set sail around 458 A
al for the Fortunate Isllulflei,
t 7,000 miles east of China_
data gave rise, in some
s, to the thought that the
I have ended up in North
ice.
re Vining also visited
and in 1884, concluded
hinese did, indeed, come to
America
ranslated ancient Chinese
is that said a group set sail
ks, were blown off course
nded up in warm coastal
They came aground on a
overed land where they
greeted by dark-skinned
ly natives. The natives
hem to an area where the
description of the land
una, and life-style depicted
it tribe.
Luvo, a Cahuilla Indian, about
the stone. He indicated his pen-
ple were long aware of the rock
and told the Wilsons, "that is one
of those rocks made by the peo-
. ple from the sea "
Still, the current thought attrib-
utes the stone carving to
Indians. But regardless of its ori-
gins, it does exist, and tempts
the imagination with its pre-
sence. And thanks to a move-
ment begun by the Hemet
Woman's Club, the stone is now
a state and county historical
landmark, in spite of its mysteri-
ous creator.
Cont `i from page 1
mayors,' nleeling in Washington
D.C. Stone said they had hoped
to meet with all the senators per-
sonally but they were in session
on Thursday and Friday.
Recently Bono joined with Rsp
CT4fshaw to reintroduce HR
184 a bill to eliminate a "si niF-
cant ia.cnities an services for
o er ne ons cause in
fair housing rules issued in 1988.
The rule has been used a_ainst
several seniors on mo.1 e an.
standar~hosing developments
in recent years. In Hemet the
Valle Hermosa subdivision lost
TRENDSETTER CUSTOM DRAPERIES
& BLINDS
658-0322
Shnwnxan In
Famier:s Comer Mall
Menlo & San Jacinto Si,
AVINGS C
'snowily
Mgr.
Jim Chtsmberlkl Glen Wolfgang
Finance Mgr. Gales
Epi Lopez
Sales
Jere Miller
Sales
EARANCE!
Mickey Marcum
Sales
R "pROGRAI
34 CHRYSLER
BARON CONY.
9, CC, TW, AM/FM
loaded. #190880.
Dan Akkerman
Sakes
Ronald larosei
Sales
George Spalding George M. Mayr
sates Sales
" CARS
'94 CHRYSLER
LE BARON
4dr. sedan, AT, PS', PB, AC,
TW, CC, PW, POL. #296220,
E OF USED CARS
'90 HONDA
ACCORD LX
AC, PW, PL
TW, CC
#059745.
$7995
'90 MAZDA
626
Auto. trans., PS, PB
air conditioner. "iortisr
I #95006A.
L4• 1.
=,
'94 CHRYSLER
NEW YORKER
Fully loaded, impeccable!
#185036.
TRUCKS
'89 FORD CROWN
VICTORIA LX
PW, PL, 1W. CC,
p. seats, low miles.
#71119.
$7995
'93 BUICK
REGAL
2-door, antenna, AC,
PW, PL, low miles.
#44512.5.
r; r mews ". — —
.smelte
•
p� p
b
t
0
11
tus
ity
tiff
se
re
mu
ho
Ass
in a
bee
nark
fede
bee
on b
tleni
jest
tion
Atto
dent
attorneys for a complete linan
milting the operation of seniors
only housing projects, and its
members have been extremely
active in furthering the cause in
Washington and the rest of the
nation.
Stone said, "I think i w a
wonderful opportunity to make
ourcase.-she warned however
that "we need to put the empha-
sis not only on services and
facilities issue but on senior
housing exemptions as well."
She said that any mobile borne
ark or development that was
sentors old " belore the 1988
le was ut into effect . hot
e "grandfatheredjn." She con -
ends that any senior who
ova into a seniors only par([
r housing development before
womrW shoe not hay
out a federal government or
park( or eousme develop-
ment owners changing thetj�, -
to "family "
n the rules revision being
ade by HUD there is a possibil-
that exemptions and a "cer-
cation" process to assure
nior home buyers they will
main in a seniors only com-
nity as long as they own their
pines.
Stone, and the Rancho Viejo
boavisinn Humeow
oclation are the defendant
federal "discrimination" suit
the hart asked a o
er person ill Illeir ti'i •arts (Jr1..
tie=� trial:before a
ral judge in Los Angeles has
n postponed while attorneys
oth sides are seeking a set-
ent. Stone has been the sub -
of What she called "ade osi-
from hell colldueied by the
they General's office a d
ands by the government
•b semis status because of the
rule and Cottonwo_od
Mobilehorlle Estates In facin
fe aril litigation on the rule as
well.
Achtenburg is having the rules
revised at this time after fi
major
and numerous held
meetingswithseniors and those supporting
seniors only housing like Van
Arsdale and the other members
of the Hemet City Council. The
Hemet City Council officially
supports maintaining and per -
_ciaLdiscin ire hnth i
and from the association.
r--- VALUABLE COUPON
FREE Installation
on Minis & Verticals
With minimum $300.00 Purchase
Must present coupon at time of purchase
L nE BLIND MAN, INC
,rae„.0228-g 1WCI
mini ni TI %art ..
A nonprofit association
I
I
%0 ZY!t a.3r
VALLEY MUSEUM ASSOCIATION
181 East Main Street
San Jacinto, California 92383
y- r�i�(,L�✓% a� l4e Sar to /SP C; .//ei'aetem ✓ Mk //zd
M, rm.= or 5 fiat/ L rd v!, "ye, mvs�l�ih
( c w-/i'Ql'hee) v �11) 7e aA-cam ✓ /e' q; iet' fG'Y -L�Gt6
F r ) h f y � - .3 rf'1 d / S ,4 i YI D ry L-h f �.I�clv�'� . e
n a 1*ie. n J 71A€ prIY,S'e;" L''o -�.r� .jc� learife rko-f- 12-41
E2 0/627i 4 6) dQ � Clh e. � t �b cL re /e.e ;4/r 8 /Vary i
eke epc,t , 2r2 ,4 // �r� you/f / 'e// Pet 9
,'uo c' rzh'r GA O is 0 )7,71ir, tzeILS',
'M d Cl ( ra rA CG,SG' CL�'7 C15 ;ec ir' 77ie l
162-C70'0 +`L� / Gf /14SIiL&7-SSC�GI���/L�, Uc� G�C2Pi3
ee ee?, gel/ S/ 2 LJIJ J • or,
a/e--erha71-e ixt t7,0 ; , /sd ice - 2'a.51.; f e ar
�r A/ 5 tpres /a $ i r ke re alf-enden,/ S �°r e m eti, 'y ;
C laZ4-t 41). /1-t4y/ar fPi 114.14r'4
Evat?S G 7 1 7,i .449199S, rr�& /d /ce
4y11,6L a r r�y5 v id-f r ve e t": Acre Ydaee i>t.
192 ed 'r/l , y 'L / "1i1 /5, '9`7 �
, epee /(IGF
t�ii; 141
TI 6 s MEMO
4$
1
$37541 — Establishment
By ordinance. the legislative body may establish a public mnaenm of aatnral
and historical objects in a city Where there is coca,,.
'$3754a - Betabltshmentr petition
Upon receiving a petition signed by one-third of tha city electoral', the. leg-
islative body shall establish a museme in such a city, tlhere several. pet1'tionsAxe
anbmittsd..••they *hall be in substantially the same form.
::,,Ifithitheconseni of. the legts4ativo body, the mayor shall aapo& pprdvet, .
to menage the
"7 «. es: "apse- seclemmaion fides
shall Maid offtos tor -Pace years• and shall eerve-tathonitaecorprinigh
eatibat4 a shall ail themselves by lot'so 'Ghat .tM-
tsrse,.,ef unsir stss expires at the end of the current riscd year,. tvcr it, the sad •
of the; next Isar, and two at the end et the• see: ad year. Taaieewiea: 42a1t:.fis filled
by appointment for the =expired tern ; ;,,.,".;'s'
3/5415' - Tratynes.t aeetina
the board of mass= trustees shall meet at least once a month at the, time and
place tissd by resolution. Three trustees row pall a spacial meeting by serving 'watt
notice upon the other members at leant, three hours before the meeting.;'
thliZiWs'ieteess aco011
A sea jerity of the board •souatttutes a quorum for tho transaction ot. bpaiasss.
¢$7647 - Trustees: president M m'saideat tjmere
The board shall. appoint ono of its members ppr'esident. Bs shall serve for ona
Pau eat until Ku esoasao!• is sirnoimwt. la bin £beam a, the board *balk saint a
president paro-tempors.
13708 - Trustees - rw,esords
The board shall. {arse a yroper reoaad of Lis psoaediags to, be hept.•
N •.
j.371549 - Certificate: t51tn : oont•gts AA its.. first meting *hi beast saal: u ' a.asirlifiloat, to as ti1st vL:h,+tf,a
state etrpeiiatsadaat of Mlle Sustruotien, ahsfv1at t hs date Ohs =WNW 1114 *stab•-
lisbed and 4, anion atf; , te}estesa s# : ggi rile.
Auz.\1a,4\ 8 a
111,
S A N
JACINTO
Memorandum
TO: Fellow Members of the City Council
FROM: Henry Haflig
DATE: February 28, 1995
RE: EVALUATION OF THE CITY MANAGER
I would like to suggest the following process for our annual evaluation of the City
Manager. At the March 7th Executive Session, distribute the evaluation forms, asking
the Councilmembers to complete those for discussion at a March 21 Executive Session
to be held at 6:00 p.m., prior to the regular Council meeting. We could also continue the
Executive Session after the regular Council meeting.
If this is acceptable to you, I will direct staff to place these on the appropriate agendas.
•L
)017
3 A N
JACINTO
Staff Report
TO: Honorable May and Councilmembers
FROM: Pam Easter
DATE: March 7, 1995
RE: INLAND EMPIRE POSTMARK
The attached letter from Clayton Record requests the Council consider a resolution
encouraging the U. S. Postal Service to change the area's postmark from "San
Bernardino" to the "Inland Empire." Clayton is representing the Monday Morning Group
of Riverside, who is leading the effort to get our mail postmark for the region changed
to the Inland Empire. An appropriate resolution is attached for your consideration and
potential approval.
attachment
lLp RY
February 24, 1995
Mayor Henry Hafliger
City of San Jacinto
P 0 Box 488
San Jacinto CA 92581
Dear Henry:
`iGiNEERS 3 ?!ANNERS
oo
:Si
'Orr, p
',09 67:iI'c'e
9O9 652.300a fox
As the accompanying Press Enterprise article explains, the Monday Morning Group,
of which I am a member, is again going to make the effort to get our mail postmark
for the region changed from San Bernardino to Inland Empire. We feel the change
would result in a better recognition of the region rather than just the City of San
Bernardino. I am also including a copy of the resolution drafted for the City of
Riverside which may help in drafting an appropriate resolution for consideration by
your council.
If I can be of any assistance just let me know.
WitIykmdst personal regards,
Clayton A. Record, Jr.
CAR:bsv
Attachment
c:1wp51 klaytonlhafliger.ltr
city's postidark problem
► It's try, try again for
business and civic leaders
who want mail sent from
Riverside stamped `Inland
-Empire' instead of
'San Bernardino.'
By Phil Pitchford
The Press -Enterprise
RIVERSIDE
If the issue of how Riverside's mail is
postmarked were a person, it would be
able to vote by now.
The Monday Morning Group, a collec-
tion of about 40 Riverside business and ties, where the mail is stamped with the
civic leaders, is reviving the effort to get ; location of the center. - • •
the San Bernardino postmark off letters ' The center serving Riverside was once
and packages mailed from Riverside In San Bernardino, but is now in Redlands.
something various groups and individuals ` The postmark remains San Bernardino,
have tried to accomplish since 1976. t..�•;however..:,t; ra•
The Monday Morning Group wants Riv '; •k•In; the past, Riversiders have blamed
erside mail marked "Inland Empire,". the £� ��, Please see POSTMARK, B-12
nickname that describes portions of west-
ern Riverside and San Bernardino coun-
ties. Members are resurrecting their effort
in hopes of finally winning approval from
the U.S. Postal Service.
"We're going to try again," group mem-
ber Jacques Yeager Sr. said yesterday.
"We're all interested in getting the Inland
Empire recognized."
The postmark is the result of all River-
side mail being sent to the San Bernardino
Mail Processing Facility, which, oddly
enough, is in Redlands.
Campaigns for an Inland Empire post-
mark in 1976 and 1981 received support
from both counties but were ultimately
rejected by the Postal Service. The service
processes mail through distribution facili-
AI is. JI ja},d t f 1 i i 1`J 2 K •
POSTMARK itilly counts s around t e city,said Riest v.
erside.Postmaster James Felts. A
Continued from B-1 ' Rive de' postmark also is avail -
'opposition from San Bernardino - able businesses and others who
officials for the new,postmark not:;-;. !.se -postage` meters. '
going through.As recently as 1991, ;•-:ti Even that method is unlikely to
-.San Bisclino officials were say- •:.~ keep ;.-",San,Bernardino off lett
• ing the vepostmark would weak- - .however, because those letters
:en their image worldwide. usually sent to the liedlands facill-
The Monday Morning Group is tY , . `postmarked again, Felts
:,hoping;;that Riverside will be -' ?,said is'•rr, /"-`
WgfdeVi, postal processing cen nindfe y
than dould employ up to 900 PO of t=ri �' dletie
"�' Redevei$ ment 'r--marked rsrd use,
Aga . Frh' P k.
Agency, Riverside developer Ray ,office ply I , ;� ark 00
'Magma and the San Bernardino :',individual pieces. -•-`1 t • .' ' '.
city government all are trying to -. -"You cannot walk in with 5,000
land the facility. pieces of mail that ydu want h
' • If thds up in Riverside, , stamped and sent out," Felts
that could lead the Postal Service "It doesn't work that way."
• to look more favorably on the , The group plans to seek resolu-
Inland Empire postmark, said tions of support from cities around
Yeager, the chairman and CEO of . the two counties. The Riverside
Yeager Construction. City Council passed one this week.
"A lot of us have worked on this Councilwoman Joy Defenbaugh
since back in the '70s," Yeager said that, while she prefers a
said. "It's difficult because basical- Riverside postmark, "I certainly
ly the post office doesn't like to support Inland Empire over San
change things. But I think it's worth Bernardino."
a shot." " Marjorie von Pohle, a La Sierra
Yeager said the effort is not woman who routinely attends
based on any anti -San Bernardino council meetings, encouraged the
feelings. council to hold out for a Riverside
"They are wonderful people and postmark.
all of us do a lot of work over there "It's humiliating enough to have
and get along fine," he said. "But to say we are not San Bernardino,"
what we're trying to promote is the she said. "But at least you can look
Inland Empire." on a map and find San Bernardi -
Tharp is n Pivarcirir mark avail- an "
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA
REQUESTING THE U. S. POSTAL SERVICE
TO CONSIDER CHANGING THE AREA'S POSTMARK
FROM SAN BERNARDINO TO "INLAND EMPIRE"
WHEREAS, the Inland Empire has, in the past decade and a half been one of the
fastest growing counties in California and the United States;
WHEREAS, the Inland Empire is frequently and specifically referred to by the
television and print media;
WHEREAS, this media identification of the Inland Empire has increased in
frequency to the point that it is the common designation;
WHEREAS, the Riverside telephone book designation Inland is used by 100
businesses and organizations and the designation Inland Empire by 51
businesses and organizations;
WHEREAS, there are 58 cities in the two -county Inland Empire area and there are
many more Inland and Inland Empire telephone book designations in these cities;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City of San Jacinto City Council
does respectfully request the postmark on all outgoing mail that is presently
postmarked San Bernardino to Inland Empire.
MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED this 7th day of March, 1995 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
CERTIFICATION
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. duly adopted by the
said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein.
Deputy City Clerk
Mayor
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
r"‘IPII
risolormlw
411111
A N
JACINTO
TO:
FROM: Parriaster
DATE: March 7, 1995
RE: 1995-96 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
SETTING WORKSHOP
b.
Staff Report
Honorable Mayor ouncilmembers
At your February 28th special meeting, we briefly discussed having the Council meet
with the City Manager and department heads to discuss the City's goals and objectives
for 1995-96. The Councilmembers indicated an interest in having the goal setting
workshop on a weekday, during the daytime hours.
I would like to propose that the City Council consider selecting among the following
dates:
Monday, March 27
Tuesday, March 28
Wednesday, March 29
Monday, April 10
Tuesday, April 11
Since this will most likely require 6 to 8 hours, the Council can choose between an all
day workshop or two half days.
no"ftwiftwo-
A N
jJACI NTO
TO:
Staff Report
Honorable Ma and Councilmembers
FROM: Paaster
DATE: March 7, 1995
RE:
PARTICIPATION IN THE 1995 HEMET NEWS'
RAMONA PAGEANT EDITION
In the past, there have been several publications related to the Ramona Pageant. The
Hemet News has done a special booklet and the Ramona Pageant has published a
souvenir booklet that is sold during the performances. Traditionally, the City of San
Jacinto has participated in one or the other of them. However, in 1994, due to budget
constraints, we did not participate in either.
This year, the Pageant Association and Hemet News have joined forces and will be
jointly publishing a Ramona Pageant edition that will be published and distributed to
Hemet News subscribers as well as sold at the Pageant. The Hemet News has
contacted me to ask if we want to participate in this upcoming edition. The costs of the
various ad sizes are:
Full Page $790
Half Page $550
1/3 Page $490
If the Council is interested in participating, a source of funds would be from your
Community Promotion account where sufficient funds are available at this time. Staff
would probably recommend a 1/2 page size for $550, with Candace working with the
Hemet News staff on content and layout. It would be helpful to also know what you
would like the focus and orientation of the ad to be: 1) economic development, 2) image
or 3) the residents of San Jacinto and the Valley.