Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 10/8/1991AGENDA SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DATE: October 8, 1991 TIME: 7:30 p.m. PLACE: COMMUNITY CENTER 625 South Pico San Jacinto, California 1.0 CALL TO ORDER Roll Ca11 Moment of Silence for Reflection Pledge of Allegiance 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 2.1 Employee Service Awards 3.0 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion by the'City Council in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests specified items to be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come forward, upon invitation of the Mayor, state their name, address and the Consent Calendar item number. 3.1 Minutes of Special Meeting of September 4. 1991 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of September 4, 1991, as submitted. 3.2 Minutes of Special Meeting of September 6, 1991 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of September 6, 1991, as submitted. 3.3 Minutes of Regular Meeting of September 17. 1991 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of September 17, 1991, as submitted. 2 3.4 Minutes of Special Meeting of September 24, 1991 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of September 24, 1991, as submitted. 3.5 Minutes of. Special Meeting of October 1, 1991 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of October 1, 1991, as submitted. 3.6 ` Claim - Jane Masuda (File #JS 92-02) RECOMMENDATION: Deny claim pursuant to Government Code. 3.7 Claim Virgil Kosmicki (File #14134 SG) RECOMMENDATION: Deny claim pursuant to Government Code. 3.8 Warrant Register RECOMMENDATION: Approve Warrants in the amount of $486,561.62 as submitted by the Finance Director. 3.9 :Change of Zone 7-91 (Rice Development Corporation) Located at the southwest corner of Evans Street and Old Mountain Avenue. RECOMMENDATION: Waive the reading of Ordinance No. 939 in full and adopt Ordinance No. 939 approving change of zone 7-91. ORDINANCE NO.. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY -COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF $AN:JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 7-91 AMENDING ZONING MAP Or THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO 3.10 Change of Zone 5-91 (Evans) Located between Shaver and Evans Streets, just east of Los Roses Avenue. RECOMMENDATION: Waive the reading of Ordinance No. 940 in full and adopt Ordinance No. 940 approving zone change 5- 91. ORDINANCE NO. 940 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 5-91 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THECITYOF SAN JACINTO 3.11 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) RECOMMENDATION: Approve the NPDES Storm Water Discharge Implementation Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute on behalf of the City. 3.12 Award Contract Well Eauipment Conversion RECOMMENDATION: Award the Grand Avenue Well Equipment Conversion contract to Beylik Drilling, Inc., in the amount of $53,309.00 and authorize the City Manager to execute a contract on behalf of the City. 3.13 State/Local Partnership Proc[ram - Esplanade Street Wideningx RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. approving State -Local Transportation Partnership Program Agreement No. SLTPP-5075 and Program Supplement NO. 001 for the Esplanade Street Widening Project. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING STATE -LOCAL MASTER AGREEMENT NO. sltpp-5075 AND PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 001 AND AUTHORIZING THEIR EXECUTION 3.14 Final Map Tract 23963 (Peacock Radaker Corp.) Located between Esplanade and Washington Avenues, west of Mountain Avenue and east of Hewitt Street RECOMMENDATION: Approve the fin ag ar}d au`f�e t Mayor to sign for recordation. , 4 If 4 44,a 3.15 TEFRA Hearing Presiding Officer RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to conduct the TEFRA Hearing on behalf of the City Council on October 15, 1991, at 10:00 A.M. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion by: approve consent calendar items 3.1 through 3.15, adopt Resolution No. and adopt. Ordinances No. 939 and 949, Vote Seconded by: to 4.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.1 Appeal - SP 2-88 Amendment (Rancho San Jacinto Development - Continued from 9/17/91) Located south of Esplanade Avenue between Mountain Avenue, Meridian Channel, and Meridian Street. RECOMMENDATION: None Motion by: Seconded by: 4.2 Northwest Improvement Area .(Continued from 9/3/91) RECOMMENDATION: Motion by: Seconded by: to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; deny the request to delete 315 acres from the Northwest Area Conceptual ,Specific Plan which would result in non- uniform and -illogical boundary; approve modification request to allow Community Commercial land use designation at the. northwest corner -of Community College Drive and State Street; and adopt Resolution. No. approving an amendment to the Land Use, Circulation, Hazards Management, and Aesthetic, Cultural, and Recreational Resoures Elements of the General Plan and adopt the Northwest Area Conceptual Specific Plan as amended. 5.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 5.1 Update on the Villas Staff Presentation 5.2 Truck Routes Kozma Staff Presentation ater Ouality -:Evans 5.3 Discharge of Firearms - Potato Festival - Kozma Staff Presentation 5.4 Update on Swimming Pool Activity Presentation by Valley -Wide Recreation & Park District 5.5 Downtown Water Line Project - B & Sons - Evans RECOMMENDATION: Approve change order in the amount o $32,356.79. 5.6 Soboba Springs Village Project Staff Presentation 6.0 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS 7.0 MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS 7.1 Update on Ground Water Association - Hafliger 8.0 CLOSED SESSION To discuss various matters 9.0 ADJOURNMENT Motion by: Seconded by: adjourn to October 15, 1991 at 10:00 Vote: Time: a.m. Action: to 9.0 ADJOURNMENT Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to adjourn to October 15, 1991 at 10:00 a.m Vote: Time: I, Maurice Armster, do hereby certify that I caused to be posted the foregoing agenda this 4th day of October, 1991, as required by law. Maurice Armster, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk T1-10MAS M. COX JAMES A. COX BEVERLY M. CAMPER October 8, 1991 COX, COX & CAMPER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 605 EAST FLORIDA AVENUE HEMET, CALIFORNIA 92343 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 714 652-1400 FAX (714) 652-3990 Memorandum Pursuant to Govt. Code Section 54956.9 Executive Session to Discuss Pending and Potential Litigation. Matters to be Discussed: Bankruptcy of Soboba and Associates and related foreclosure on Ass.Dist 87-1. Work Comp Claim of Margaret Cameron Esplanade & Associates v. City of San Jacinto With regard to the Matter of the Soboba bankruptcy, executive session has been requested to obtain Council direction on the City's position relative to the recent reorganization plan submitted by Soboba and Associates for Court approval. The City's ballot for acceptance/rejection of the plan must be cast no later than October 17, 1991. With regard to tbe worhers comp claim of Margaret Cameron, our administrator and defense counsel have asked for authority to settle the claim with Ms. Cameron in exchange for her compromise and release of liability. This matter will be addressed by the City Finance Director. With regard to the Esplanade lawsuit, the City was recently served with this matter which also names Brian McNabb as defendant. The City attorney wishes to advise you of the circumstances and claims made in the suit, and obtain authority to retain Counsel to defend the matter . James A. Cox City Attorney CONFIDENTIAL, NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE AGENDA SAN JACINTO CITY COUNL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DATE: October 8, 1991 TIME: 5:00 p.m. PLACE: Community Center 625 South Pico San Jacinto, California 1.0 CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Moment of Silence for Reflection Pledge of Allegiance 2.0 ORDER OF BUSINESS - JOINT MEETING WITH CITY OF HEMET 2.1 Agreement on dealing with annexations of areas of mutual interest to the cities of San Jacinto and Hemet. 2.2 Update on study of land use in the general area west of State Street between Esplanade and Eaton. 2.3 Update of joint public safety facilities study. 3.0 Recess for Dinner. 4.0 Reconvene at 7:00 P.M. in Closed Session pursuant to Government Code. 5.0 ADJOURNMENT Motion by: Seconded by: adjourn to October 8, 1991 at 7:30 p.m. Vote: Time: Action: to I, Maurice Armster, do hereby certify that I caused to be posted the foregoing agenda this 4th day of October, 1991, as required by law. Maurice Armster, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: October 4, 1991 SUBJ: Consideration of joint program with City of Hemet developing a logical annexation process for the area between Esplanade Avenue and Eaton and generally between Warren Road and State Street. For the past several months Mayor Boykin, Henry Hafliger, and your staff have been meeting with a committee from the City of Hemet in order to develop a plan under which logical annexation boundaries can be created between the Cities. This was a resurrection of a committee that had been meeting several years ago. Attached for your use and information is the program the committee has reviewed and is recommending for approval. It will be explained in detail of the joint City Council meeting. If the proposal is acceptable to both Council, we will bring back a Resolution for adoption. Respectfully, BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development CF Hp' GUNT +44 _Z-71essf "a / 02- / 4/0/ 5-Att 450 FAST LATHAM AVENUE •HEMET, CALIFORNIA 92343 40714) 658-9411 September 23, 1991 TO: City Council Members of the City of San Jacinto/City of Hemet Attached please find the Hemet/San Jacinto Procedures For Area of Common Interest for the meeting scheduled for October 8, 1991. Respectfully submitted, Mark Goldberg Director, Communit Development Attachment HEMET/SAN JACINTO PROCEDURES FOR AREA OF COMMON INTEREST OCTOBER 8, 1991 PROPOSED RULES GOVERNING ANNEXATION OF AREAS OF MUTUAL INTEREST TO THE CITIES OF SAN JACINTO AND HEMET PERTINENT DEFINITIONS 1. Sphere of Influence The area designated by LAFCO as the maximum ultimate Corporate City Limits of a City pursuant to State Law. 2. Common Sphere of Influence The area between the two Cities where the spheres of influence of the two Cities overlap because annexation to either City is logical. This area is designated by the mutual consent of the Cities of San Jacinto and Hemet and LAFCO. 3, Hemet Common Sphere Line The southerly most line of the common sphere of Influence. This line is generally represented by the Eaton Avenue alignment between State Street and Warren Road. 4. San Jacinto Common Sphere Line The northerly most line of the common sphere of influence. This line is generally represented by Esplanade Avenue from State Street to Warren Road. 5. Section A survey te hi representing one square mile (5,280 feet X 5,280 feet) (640 acres) measured from a specific designated beginn- ing point as shown on the United States Geological Survey map (Exhibit "A"). 6. Section Line The outside perimeter lines of a section (Exhibit "A"). 7. Quarter Section Line Lines cutting a section into four quarters (Exhibit "A"). 8. One -Eighth Section Line An east -west line cutting a quarter section in half (Exhibit "B"). page 2 9. One -Sixteenth Section Line An east -west line cutting an eighth section in half (Exhibit 10. Grid Bar RULES A rectangle defined by a Section Line and Quarter Section Line on the east and west perimeter and by either a Section Line, Quarter Section Line, One -Eighth Section Line or One -Sixteenth Section Line on the north and south perimeter (Exhibit "C"). ALL OF THE FOLLOWING RULES SHALL BE COMPLIED WITH PRIOR TO LAFCO APPROVAL OF ANY ANNEXATION WITHIN THE COMMON SPHERE OF INFLUENCE 1. Minimum area for annexation within the common sphere of influence shall consist of one whole Grid Bar, except as noted in Rule 6 below. 2. No parcel to be annexed shall be split by any boundary of a Grid Bar. 3. Any Grid Bar(s) lying between a peninsula established by annexation and the common sphere line of the City which possesses the peninsula can only be annexed to the City possessing the peninsula (Exhibit "D"). 4. Vehicular access to a parcel or parcels within a proposed annexation shall not go through the other City's grid or common sphere grid (Exhibit "E"). 5. Vehicular access to a parcel or parcels within a proposed annexation may be provided along a Grid Bar boundary, even if all or a portion of the access is within another jurisdiction (Exhibit "F"). 6. If at least one whole Grid Bar is proposed for annexation, a portion of an adjacent Grid Bar to the east or west may be concurrently annexed when the boundaries of the portion correspond with property lines. The remainder may be annexed at a later date in accord with rules pertaining to whole Grid Bars (Exhibit "G"). October 8, 1991 EXHIBIT "A" SECTION 2640' Quarter Section Line 5280' LINE Quarter Section Line 2640' Quarter Section Line Quarter Section Line SECTION LINE w Z 0 0 w co Typical Section showing SECTION LINES and Quarter Section Lines. 8/1/91 c ce EXHIBIT "B" 1/16 Section Line 1/8 Section Line 1/16 Section Line Quarter I Section Line Quarter Section Line 1/8 Section Line Typical Section with Quarter Section Line, 1/8 Section Line and 1/16 Section Lines marked. 1/16 Section Line 1/8 Section Line QuarterlSection Line Grid Bar 1 Grid Bar 2 Quarter Section Line EXHIBIT "C" UJ 0 U uJ EXHIBIT "D" Effect of Peninsula on Areas which can be Annexed. SECTION LINE This area can only be i w 0 J z U uJ tra Quarter Section Line II"F CITY O S N - CINTO annexed by San Jacinto Peninsula This area can be — annexed by either city CITY OF HEMET SECTION LINE SECT 8JV91 EXHIBIT "E" PARCEL ACCESS RESTRICTIONS The City of San Jacinto cannot annex Grid BB because the only access to Parcel 2 is through City of Hemet. SECTION LINE Grid AA CITY OF SAN JACINTO Parcel 1 Grid BB Parcel 2 Parcel 3 Dedicated Street A \ Grid CC CITY OF HEMET Quarter Section Line 8/1/91 Quarter Section Line EXHIBIT "F" PER ITTED ACCESS City of San Jacinto may annex Grid BB because Parcel 2 has access along a Grid Line. SECTION LINE Parcel 1 SECTION LINE Grid AA CITY OF SAN JACINTO Grid BB Parcel 2 Grid CC CITY OF HEMET Parcel 3 Dedicated Street A Quarter Section Line 8/V 1 EXHIBIT "G" GRID BAR EXTENSION & RE AINDER ❑ ❑ . i /�i ,. ®❑ �,EXTENSI' 7 �ON REMAINDER /ONE GRID BAR AREA OF CO ON INTEREST CURRENT SAN JACINTO BOUNDARY Esplanade ••••••r STONEY MTN. RANCH CURRENT HEMET BOUNDARY /1/44 o/et, etrt Memorandum onorable Mayors and Members of the City Councils oss Chadwick, Fire Chief for the City of San Jacinto am'Dahlquist, Fire Chief for the City of Hemet Consolidation of Fire Services Recommendation: Review the initial Fire Department report (draft dated October 1, 1991) on consolidating` all or certain functions of the City of Hemet and City of San Jacinto Fire Departments. A joint City Council meeting between both cities on October 8, 1991 will provide both City Councils a chance to jointly discuss and question both fire department staffs on the feasibility of consolidation. Background: For more than one year the city managers, fire chiefs and police chiefs of both cities have been meeting on a regular basis. We have discussed the options available for consolidation of certain public safety services between the two cities. The original intent of these meetings was to specifically consider the possibility of a joint communications facility. However, considerations expanded into other possibilities such as shared public safety facilities, i.e., a joint fire training facility and joint police facility. Previous to these meetings, both fire chiefs had met and agreed that many options were available to both cities for consolidating certain fire department functions; especially communications and training. The original suggestion of joint communications was made by our fire departments. An automatic aid agreement was developed which both City Councils have subsequently accepted and signed. The logical next step after this cooperative agreement between the cities is to examine if both cities are interested in consolidating more functions of the fire departments or if there is interest to study the feasibility of total consolidation. The attached report is a draft of an initial study which provides information to the City Councils and City Managers. This study can be expanded if the City Councils desire an in-depth review of consolidation of the two fire departments. ROSS CHADWICK WILLIAM DAHLQUIST Fire Chief, City of San Jacinto Fire Chief, City of Hemet Section I INTRODUCTION The fiscal challenges and taxpayer revolts confronting today's local governments mandate that local government leaders, elected and appointed, identify and evaluate alternative methods of delivering essential public services. One potential cost -reducing alternative available in the public safety area is the jurisdictional consolidation of fire services. Consolidation can be in the form of functional consolidations or a complete merger of both fire departments. Table I-1 Comparison of Cities Hemet San Jacinto Totals Population 48,000 17,576 65,576 Square Miles 19.142 12.77 31.912 Assessed Valuation $1,550,000, $607,510,177 $2,157,510,177 Hemet and San Jacinto's fire departments have cooperated at varying levels over the past years. This cooperation has evolved from an unstructured mutual aid system into a very structured mutual aid system with a formal automatic aid agreement for certain areas of both cities. This arrangement has proven very beneficial to both encies. The next logical step in cooperation and enhancement of fire protection in both communities is consolidation. This report initiates a study on the feasibility of consolidation of some fire department functions up to a total combination of the two fire departments. While this report asks more questions than it answers, its primary purpose, at this time, is to inform and then encourage considerable thought and additional input. P; el-1 DRAFT 10/1/91 Section I -- Introduction The most important issue that must be faced is simply, a is best for the citizens of the City of Herne : ' d the City of San Jacinto? .The current delivery system involving two separate fire departments `'requires duplication overhead, resouroes and coordination. When considering consolidation of fire department services, it is important to remember that fire protection delivery systems have three relationships among expenditure and program components. They are: Cost/Benefit — What do you get for the amount you have paid? • Cost Effectiveness — Is what you paid for worth the cost? • Cost Distribution -- Does everyone pay equally for the service? However, a fourth essential element must be considered: • Cost Containment — How do you keep the costs within the customer's ability to pay? Concept of Functional Consolidation Many fire departments functionally consolidate some of their activities to gain the cost effective advantages derived from being larger or being able to support specialization or a whole unit of activity. Consolidated training, communications, fleet maintenance, purchasing, records management, administrative services, code enforcement and hazardous materials control are some examples. • Training: The high cost of training facilities, training staff, equipment, and training materials make consolidation of neighboring fire departments look very inviting. Neither city can afford to build and maintain a training facility with classrooms, drill tower, water systems and driving skills course. Both cities have a training facility as part of their capital improvement plans; P: e I-2 DRAFT 10/1/91 Section I -- Introduction however, by combining their resources they could build a facilitymore complete than either could afford separately. Cane well-e nipped training center with a qualified training staff coin consistent training to all personnel. Currently, there is no in-service training facility available to any of the fire departments in the Valley (including the Crounty). Tll s includes access drill towers, burn buildings, drafting pits, and the ce. The absence of such facilities makes "hands on' training difficult on either an individual agency or a joint agency basis. While such facilities are available in other sections of Riverside County, location makes it virtually impossible to use them for on -duty personnel. Significant` travel time and overtime costs are associated with using out -of -the -area training facilities. Each of the fire departments devote staff resources to the training function. However, only Hemet has a full-time chief officer assigned responsibility for training activities. In San Jacinto, training is an additional responsibility of an on -shift captain who also has other functional assignments. As a result, establishment of a joint training capability would have a mixed cost savings impact on each of the individual agencies. Common approaches to training would facilitate the departments working together in such areas as mutual aid and increased automatic aid and also cause standardization of operational procedures and actions. Establishment of a joint training facility and training operations could enable each of the cities to avoid the individual cost of establishing minimal fire training facilities in future years. Additionally, joint training would support other joint activities which the departments might undertake in future years. Riverside County Fire Department has expressed a strong desire to be part of a joint training facility in the Valley. • Communications: Communications is the function most often consolidated in the fire service. The main reasons for these consolidations are: O Higher level of service. O Usually a savings in total cost. O Standardization of terminology and services. O Better utilization of radio frequencies. Page 1-3 D 10/1/91 Section I -- Introduction Establishment of a consolidated fire dispatch center would clearly improve the capability of the two fire departments to coordinate current activities and pave the way for future and increased automatic aid and mutual aid responses. The cost of joint communications could also be shared with other agencies who have expressed a willingness to participate such as Murrieta Fire Protection District, Idyllwild Fire Protection District and Banning Fire Department. Fleet Maintenance: The more fire engines and other apparatus and equipment to be maintained makes the concept of a joint maintenance program more feasible. The more units to be maintained will lower the overall cost per unit. In addition, standardized preventative maintenance programs ran be instituted. Purchasing: Consolidation provides the opportunity to buy in quantity and many times the bidding process is improved. Purchasing 'big ticket" items such as fire apparatus and equipment becomes more standardized and less expensive. Purchasing equipment and supplies in quantity (-an provide a very substantial reduction in cost. Administrative Services: The consolidation of the administrative functions of both agencies should result in a reduction of overhead with resulting cost saving. It also allows a larger data base for making better administrative decisions and more uniformity of policies and procedures. Once central personnel department used to recruit, test and hire personnel for consolidated fire departments can substanf ally reduce cost and duplication. The central personnel department would assure that consistent standards are met and provide equally qualified candidates for both departments. Code Enforcement (Fire Prevention): Fire prevention requires expertise for good code enforcement. Combined efforts can provide a larger staffing pool to select from. The Page I-4 DRAFT 10/1/91 Section I -- Introduction' ;> standardization of codes in both cities would make it easier for the public to understand and comply with. Inspection practices would become more 'uniform and accepted. A larger data base should make identification of fire problems more accurate and would allow for better direction of fire prevention efforts. In addition to code enforcement, an improved public education program could be initiated. Both cities have individual public education pro with duplication of effort, time and resources. Since the "message is the same, joining forces would facilitate a better and more cost effective program. Hazardous Materials Control: Programs that would be cost prohibitive if done by each department individually might become more practical if combined. Hazardous materials present a good opportunity. The law requires specific training for all firefighters in hazardous materials. Providing this training on a consolidated program would be less expensive and more effective. If the cities decided to increase the level of hazardous materials response of their fire departments, a joint program could be developed to respond to both cities. There are many variations of the concept of functional consolidations. Success usually depends upon the willingness to participate, the cost effectiveness, the quality of service provided, the sriministrator(s), perceived equity and fairness, and the general attitude for cooperating expressed by all parties including the labor units. Functional consolidation may also be the first step to a total consolidation. This would pave the way for a smoother transition when personnel, equipment and facilities were merged into one organisation. Functional consolidation should continue to occur even if the two departments do not merge completely. Disadvantages of Functional Consolidation: There is still some loss of control and considerable hidden costs involved. Control is lost became decisions become more complex and there is a binding Page 1-5 DRAFT 10/1/91 Section I -- Introduction force to cooperate even though it may not be to ,the advantage of a ;specific envy. Hidden never show becausethey are consumed in el effort required as part of the management process, i.e. planning, ' coordination controlling and critiquing. Attitudes and issue development, if not positive and supportive and focusb+ toward improvements can 'break the system. As with any organization there is always a divergence of values and it is just as simple to destroy through delays and obstruction as well as to cooperate and improve. There must be a supportive spirit that another organizational unit can do it better or cheaper and be willing to reduce your organization in scope along with some loss of direct control to achieve your mission. Without it, functional consolidation will not work. Concept of Total Consolidation One of the most desired goals of a public administration is the attainment of a desired level of service at the lowest possible cost. The search for cost reduction has led a number of cities and fire districts to totally consolidate more than one fire service agency into one single fire organization. Section III describes several alternatives for organizing consolidated fire agencies. The concept of consolidation creates "political' problems within local governments and the various fire departments involved. The Fire Protection Handbook says that "fire departments are representatives of the local community that supports them." With this in mind, each community views the fire department as "its' fire department and expects it to represent the ideals of the community. They also expect the fire department to provide the level of fire protection acceptable to the expectations of the community and to be cost effective in the delivery of these services. Therefore, the fear of losing control of the ability to formulate the policies that govern the level of fire protection for the community becomes an important issue that must be addressed in order for the community to accept the concept of consolidation. Page 1-6 DRAFT I t!l1/9l Section I -- Introduction ati O How ' the consolidation effort be ov , ? • Who will formulate the policies for the fire protection of the consolidated area? O How individualentities retainthe feelingof pride either individnals or members of the group? Funding for fire departments is accomplished in many ways, i.e., direct allocation out of general funds, individual taxing districts, fund raising and donations, and fees for services performed. The disbursement of funds to provide an equitable level of fire protection for all of the occupancies of the consolidated area must be agreed upon. Questions to be answered: O What method or methods of funding will be used by the consolidated area? ® What factors will determine the disbursement of funds to the areas that have been consolidated? Fire prevention activities within a consolidated fire department should be department wide. Codes and ordinances may have to be modified to encompass the entire district. • Questions to be answered: o Can one set of codes be adopted for the entire consolidated area? O Can other codes and ordinances that directly influence fire protection, such as licenses, plan review, zoning, land use, building codes, etc. be adopted? O Since each city's fire department also runs the building department, can the entire building and life safety departments be consolidated along with the fire departments? Page 1-7 DRAFT 10/1/91 Section I -- Introduction Fire department personnel take pride in their fire department and often times view:consolidation as a threat to their careers. Their interest is centered around providing fire protection for 'their' community. In the formulation of policy that governs and determines the level of fire protection for the community, consolidation sometimes requires reduction of positions in the management levels of the fire department. Persons view this as a limiting factor that will influence their opportunities within their profession. Pride within a fire department creates strong esprit de corps within their department. The idea of losing the identity of the local department creates many jealousies that must be overcome to move toward a consolidatid fire department. • Questions to be answered: O What are the effects on the different retirement systems? Can they be consolidated? O Is it possible to work out issues to the satisfaction of the groups concerned? (Such things as insurance programs, hospital care, plans, vacation benefits and other fringe benefits) O If positions are to be eliminated, who and by what means? O How are fire officers and chief officers to be absorbed? O Who becomes the one "chief?" O How is the selection of staff of the consolidated fire department to be accomplished? O What will be the effect on career opportunities under the new consolidated organization? O How will the assignment of personnel be administered? O Om the organized labor groups be consolidated? O What is the attitude of the labor groups toward consolidation? O How will personnel policies be determined? O What effect will the different pay plans have on the new consolidated department? O Can entry level standards be agreed upon? O C's+n promotional procedures be implemented? Page 1-8 H ' 10/1/91 Section I = Introduction Each fire department has its own operational procedures based upon its situation, utilization of equipment and staffmg available. To operate effectively and efficiently, departments must reach agreement on operational procedures O How will the situation be analyzed to determine which procedures will be the most effective? O How will individual departments be convinced to standardize their procedures? Communication is a vital component of a fire department. The method of notifying the fire department of an emergency must be simple and easily understood by the public. The system of receiving alarms should be standardized throughout the community served by a consolidated fire department. A system of transmitting alarms and handling radio traffic must be uniform. Data systems are important. A communication center for a consolidated fire department must be planned to the needs of the consolidated communities. • Questions to be answered: O How are radio frequencies to be used? O C'an standardization of communication procedures be agreed upon? O Will dedica erl telephone lines be necessary? O Can a central fire alarm communication center concept be agreed upon? One major advantage of a consolidated fire department is the placement of fire facilities such as fire stations and training centers. Because response areas are also consolidated, planning for where fire stations will be located can be based on a defined response district rather than jurisdictional boundaries. Both cities may succeed in eliminating at least one of their future planned stations due to this concept. Pa-e P9 me station designs and locations be `agreed upon? Who wall govern staffmg levels at new stations? This introduction section addresses many of the issues of consolidation. This report does not judge whether consolidation is good or bad; the response to that can only be resolved by each entity itself through a complete study which will answer all the questions. Only after that study can the final feasibility of consolidation, whatever form it takes, be decided. P eI-10 To provide a background for analysis of consolidation and other joint action opportunities, this section provides a brief summary of current, individual fire service operations in the two cities. The data reviewed are based on department operations and resources for fiscal year 1991-92 =- the most current information available. Fire Service Operations in the Two Cities'. Will Cost Over $4.0 Million During Fiscal Year 1991-92 Costs of fire service vary significantly between the two cities, reflecting differences in community size, characteristics, and the like. Table II-1 shows several perspectives on fire service cost for fiscal year 1991-92. Table II-1 Fire Service Costs Hemet San Jacinto Total FY 1991-92 Budget $3,208,41.1 $813,982 $4,018,393 Cost Per Capita $66.76 $46.31 $61.28 Cost Per $100 AV $0.21 $0.13 $0.19 As can be seen from Table II-1, budgeted fire service expenditures for FY 1991- 92 total $4.01 million, but reflect some rather substantial variations in fire service cost when measured on a per capita or per $100 assessed valuation basis. As subsequent analysis will show, these variations may complicate development of equitable cost sharing formulas if some form of consolidation is effected. rage 11-1 Section II - A Perspective on Current Fire Services ore 50 Personnel a volved in Fire Services in e Two Cities Tables 11-2 and -3 provide an overview of people, apparatus and facility resources currently involved in the fire service delivery in the two cities. Table 11-3 Fire Companies and Fire Stations Hemet San Jacinto Total Fire Stations 2 1 3 Engine Companies 2 1 3 Truck Companies 1 0 1 Paramedic Companies 0 0 0 New Fire Stations Planned 1 1 2 for Near Future (1 year) P= A e 1I-2 Section 11 - A Perspective On Current Fire Services Philosophies Related to Fire vention are Comps ble « ong the Two Cities Both cities stress fire prevention to reduce the demand for fire protection responses. Analysis of Emergency Responses Indicates the Demand for Fire Service Response is Generally NOT Comparable Across the Two Cities Table II-4 illustrates the emergency service responses in 1990. The City of Hemet has a higher per capita emergency response than does the City of San Jacinto. Hemet annually responds to a higher percentage of emergency medical respons s than does San Jacinto. However, fire rolls are comparable on an annual basis. Table 11-4 Emergency Service Responses - 1990 Hemet San Jacinto Number Per % of Number Per % of of Calls Capita Total of Calls Capita Total Fire Calls 211 0.006 4.6% 184 0.010 8.4% Emergency Medical Calls 3,930 0.112 84.9% 1,264 0.072 58.1% Other Emergency Calls 498 0.0142 10.8% 731 0.041 33.5% Totals 4,630 0.132 100% 2,179 0.124 100% 1?<,te Section 11- A Perspective on Current Fire Services Personnel Costs are NOT Comparable Between the Two Cities As Table II-5 indicates, personnel salaries are substantially different between the two cities. In addition, each city is in a different PERS retirement program: Hemet is 2% at 50 years and San Jacinto is 2% at 55 years. Fringe benefits such as health insurance, etc. are similar. Table 11-5 Fire Department Personnel Monthly Salaries Position Hemet San Jacinto Fire Chief $6,807 $5,850 Deputy Fire Chief $5,887 N/A Battalion Chief $5,333 N/A Fire Captain $3,783* $3,392 Fire Engineer $3,147* $2,784 Firefighter $2,861* $2,400 * Additional Salary Increases Pending Page 11-4 Section III ALTERNATIVES FOR ORGANIZING A CONSOLIDATED FIRE SERVICES AGENCY Overall, there are a variety of options which exist for organizing a consolidated fire services organization. These include the following: Establishi g a joint powers agreement between the participating cities, and under the terms of the joint powers agreement, establishing and maintaining a stand-alone fire services agency. Form a fire protection district made up of the two cities and name the district to reflect the area of coverage and population. Having one city take the lead in providing service under contract to the other city. The following explores the advantages and disadvantages of each of these organizational alternatives. Establish A Joint Powers Agency Establishment of a joint powers agency would provide the opportunity for each city to exercise a degree of local control over fire service operations, service levels and costs. Under this option, San Jacinto and Hemet would become signatories to a joint powers agreement for the delivery of fire services in the two -city area. Basic elements of the joint powers approach to organizing and operating a consolidated fire service organization would include the following: Creation of a joint powers commission to provide overall policy for the two -city fire service operation. The joint powers commission could be composed of representatives of each member City Council. The commission could be formed by each City Council selecting two of its members to represent the City on the joint powers fire service commission. Page I17-1 D' • F! 10/1/91 Section 111 -- Alternatives for Organizing Consolidated Fire Services There are two basic approaches to commission formation and operation: 1. Provide equal membership for each city under the 'one city -- one voteconcept. Advantages: (1) Simplicity of operation. (2) Eliminates potential for jealousy problems resulting from one city having a greater influence than other member cities over fire service design and delivery. Disadvantage: (1) If cities contribute different amounts to support fire service operations, individual city influence may not be commensurate with financial contribution. 2. Provide member cities commission membership and voting authority based on the cost sharing formula developed to fund the consolidated operations. Advantage: (1) Each city's authority will be commensurate with its financial contribution. Disadvantage: (1) Potential complexity in the operation of the commission. For example, it could be possible one city would dominate all commission decisions based on the financing formula and the resulting voting formula developed and agreed upon. Regardless of the approach taken to provide individual city membership on the joint powers commission, the joint powers approach has a number of common elements: Each of the participating cities would situ a joint powers agreement which would provide for the joint delivery of fire services over a multi -_year Page I 2 10/1/91 Section III -- Alternatives for Orgsni7ing Consolidated Fire Services period. Most joint powers agreements require longer term membership of participating cities and require multi -year withdrawal provisions to insure continuity of operations. The joint powers agency, resulting from the signing of such a joint powers contract, would employ all fire service employees, own all fire service assets, and provide services in the two -city area. The joint powers commission, whose membership was discussed above, would provide overall broad policy definition for fire service operations; review and approve consolidated fire service budgets; and serve as an appeals body for personnel grievances related to day-to-day fire service operation. The Fire Chief of the consolidated fire service agency would report to the joint powers commission and would have overall responsibility for control of all day-to-day fire service operations. The Fire Chief would be appointed by and be responsible to the commission. The joint powers agency would be funded by payments to the agency from each of the participating cities. A subsequent section of this report discusses alternative formulas which could be employed to structure individual city contributions to the support of the joint fire services agency. Under the terms of the joint powers agreement, each of the individual cities could contribute stations and existing apparatus and equipment to the new joint powers agency. If desirable, ownership of facilities and equipment could be retained by the individual cities, or transferred to the joint powers commission for use during the life of the agreement. Provisions could be established to return assets to participating cities upon the expiration of the joint powers agreement and re-establishment of individual city operations should that occur. A joint powers agency could be established by decision of each of the individual city councils and does not require a vote of the electorate to provide fmancing for the agency. It also allows each city to retain some degree of local control through participation in the joint powers commission and would not result in an individual city being identified as the service provider for the entire two -city area. Page 111- D FT 10/1/91 Section HI -- Alternatives for Organizinj Consolidated Fire Services Form a Fire Protection District The second potential approach which could be taken to organize the consolidated fire protection service for the two cities would be to establish a special district. This process would 'include: An approval vote of the electorate in the two cities. Possibly levying an assessment tax on the two areas to support fire service operations -- approved through the formation vote above. Establishing a district Board of Directors to include membership from each incorporated area. The chief advantage of establishing a consolidated fire department under the special district approach would be the availability of a dedicated funding source — a property assessment tax levy -- to support fire service in each of the two cities. However, the major disadvantages include the following: Such a step would require the approval of the electorate of a two-thirds vote to establish a property assessment tax levy. Additionally, because of significant differences in assessed valuation among the two cities, establishment of a fire district could result in a disproportionate allocation of costs. One City Provide Services to the Other City Under a Contrac A third approach which could be used to establish a consolidated fire service for the two cities would be for one of the cities to provide service under contract to the remaining city. Under this approach, a lead city could be designated through a joint powers agreement, or the remaining city could contract with the other for service delivery. Page 111-4 D FI 10/1/91 Section TT T Alternatives for Organizing Consolidated Fire Services If the joint powers agreement option with one city taking the lead were selected, the approach would contain the following major elements: Signatories to the agreement would stipulate that one of the cities would provide services to both member cities. Costs of fire service could be shared on a formula allocation basis. As noted earlier, a later section evaluated alternative fmancing formulas. The joint powers commission would be established comprised of city council members from each of the two cities and would be responsible for contracting with one of the cities for service delivery. Basic service levels to be provided to each of the cities could be defined in the joint powers agreement. This could include: O Station locations O Staffing levels O Basic equipment assignments O The number of fire prevention inspections to be performed annually in each of the participating cities. O Other as appropriate To ensure that local control would not be totally abdicated, the joint powers agreement could stipulate that the majority of the vote of the joint powers commission would be required before service levels defined in the agreement were modified. Equipment and capital facilities could be provided for as follows: Q Provide for member cities to transfer their vehicle equipment to the service delivering city for the life of the joint powers agreement. O Provide for the other city not operating a fire department to lease existing stations and facilities to the delivering agency for the life of the agreement. Page III-5 T3 10/1/91 Section 1II -- Alternatives for Organizing Consolidated Fire Services As noted, the concept of one city taking the lead in providing service to the entire area could be implemented through either inter -city contracts or through the establishment of a joint powers agreement. The major disadvantage associated with this approach is the perception of the city who would not be involved in direct service delivery. Issues such as inter -city relationships, local pride, and the like might work against one city serving the entire area. This is a common problem in areas where the Riverside County Fire Department contracts to a city for fire protection and would most likely be even more of a problem between two cities. Page 11I 6 Section IV ALTE ` ATIVES FOR FUNDING A CONSO 1.ATED FIRE SERVICES AGENCY In process of development at the present time. Standby for release to City Councils by 10/8/91. Page /9y'evicria MINUTES SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY September 17, 1991 The San Jacinto City Council convened in Closed Session at 6:45 p.m. at the Community Center, 650 South Pico, San Jacinto, California with all Councilmembers present. ORDER OF BUSINESS: Closed Session for potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. The Session recessed at 6:25 P.M. with no action being taken. 1.0 CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council convened at 7:30 P.M. at the Community Center, 650 South Pico, San Jacinto, Present: Absent: California. Councilmembers Ford, Hafliger, Leahy, Richards and Mayor Boykin None A Moment of Silence was observed for Reflection Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Boykin 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 2.1 Signing of Sister City Agreement by Francis R. Boykin, Mayor of San Jacinto and Vladimir A. Lapin, Councilman of Zhukovsky, Russia. Distinguished guest Lapin, through his interpreter Michael Lennon, stated this was a historical moment between two great countries. 2.2 Employee Service Awards - Police Department City Manager Easter introduced Senior Planner Tim Hults Mayor Boykin presented the following service awards: FIVE YEARS SERVICE: Howard Ballard (not present), Debra Caskey, Curtis Curtiss (not present), Blane Dillon, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Walter Hill (not present), Joe Kozma (not present), Nick Martinez (not present), John Napolitano (not present), Lawrence Preston, Samuel Rickman and Dennis Warner. TEN YEARS SERVICE Dennis Love 1 3.0 CONSENT CALENDAR A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember Hafliger to approve the consent calendar as presented. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote. 3.1 Minutes of Special Meeting of September 3, 1991 Approved the Minutes of September 3, 1991, as submitted. 3.2 Warrant Register Approved Warrants No. 26018 through 26207 dated September 15, 1991, in the amount of $271,655.57 as submitted by the Finance Director. 3.3 Financial Report Received and filed. 3.4 Treasurer's Report for the Month of August, 1991 Received and filed. 3.5 Funds Advancement - CFD 87-1 Adopted Resolution No. 1996 authorizing the advancement of funds to CFD 87-1 in the amount of $99,247.50 for principal and interest. RESOLUTION NO. 1996 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ADVANCEMENT OF FUNDS TO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 87-1 3.6 Economic Development Coordinator Job Description Approved job description and authorized the City Manager to proceed with recruitment. 3.7 Computer Engine Analyzer Purchase Authorized the purchase of a Sun MCA-3000 Engine Analyzer in the amount of $25,965.60 from Sun Electric Corporation from account #40-4550-5400. 3.8 Final Parcel Map 25576 (San Jacinto Investors, Inc.) Located on the west side of San Jacinto Avenue approximately 281 feet north of Esplanade Avenue. Approved the final Parcel Map and authorized the recording of the map and execution of the subdivision agreement and the agreementforfuture widening and installation of curb, gutter and sidewalk, paving and other public improvements to San Jacinto Avenue. 2 3.9 Bond Release Tract 22950-2 (California Ranch Homes) Located on the southeast corner of Palm Avenue and De Anza Drive. Reduced the bonds by 85%, thereby reducing the Performance Bond to $38,558.10 and the Labor/Material Bond to $38,558.10. 3.10 Change of Zone 7-91 (Rice Development Corporation) Located at the southwest corner of Evans Street and Old Mountain Avenue. Waived the reading of Ordinance No. 939 in full and in- troduced Ordinance No. 939 approving change of zone 7-91. ORDINANCE NO. 939 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO/ CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 7-91 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF 3.11 General Redevelopment Proiect Adopted Resolution No. 1997 designating a Redevelopment Survey Area for study purposes. RESOLUTION NO. 1997 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO/ DESIGNATING A REDEVELOPMENT SURVEY AREA FOR STUDY PURPOSES THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO 3.12 Outreach Worker First Amendment to Agreement with County of Riverside Approved the first amendment to agreement with the County of Riverside for an Outreach Worker at the rate of $18.21 per unit for 96 units and authorized the City Manager to execute said amendment for the period through September 30, 1991. 3.13 Defeasance of Certificates of Participation Authorized the City Manager, in consultation with the City Finance Director, the City Attorney and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, as the City's bond counsel, to take such actions and to execute such documents, including escrow agreements between the City and Security Pacific National Bank, as trustee for (i) the City's 1987 Certificates of Participation (for the City's Administrative Facility Project) and (ii) City's 1988 Certificates of Participation (for the City's Fire Station Project), as may be required to accomplish the defeasance of such Certificates of Participation. 3 4.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.1 Appeal - SP 2-88 Amendment (Rancho San Jacinto Development - Continued from 8/27/91) Located south of Esplanade Avenue between Mountain Avenue, Meridian Channel, and Meridian Street request to change use to RV parking and storage. Staff advised that the applicant has requested this matter be continued to the meeting of October 8, 1991. Mayor Boykin inquired if speakers present were willing to return on at that time for comments. Speakers agreed. Norman Surbeck, 2041 Hooper Drive, voiced concern that grading is presently taking place. Mayor Boykin advised that the developer can build houses on that parcel unless they obtain an amendment and the grading has nothing to do with other uses. Mr. Surbeck advised he would wait for the continuance to rebut. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Hafliger, seconded by Councilmember Leahy to continue this matter to the meeting of October 8, 1991. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote. 4.2 Change of Zone 5-91 (Evans) (Continued from 9/3/91) Located between Shaver and Evans Streets, just east of Los Rosas Avenue to change zone from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) on 42 acres. Senior Planner Hults gave a brief staff report on this matter, stating this would conform with the General Plan designation for the area. Staff brought forward a mitigated negative declaration for the proponents to participate in financing for school facilities. City Attorney Cox, in response to Council, stated, in the absence of a signed agreement, the mitigation measures were necessary. Further, fees would not be paid until permits are pulled and if the agreement is in place at that time the fees would not apply. Because this was not a final map the timing would not be at occupancy. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember Hafliger to approve Change of Zone 5-91; adopt the mitigated negative declaration; waive the reading of Ordinance No. 940 in full; and introduce Ordinance No. 940 approving zone change 5-91. Motion carried on a 4-1 vote with Councilmember Richards dissenting. 4 ORDINANCE NO. 940 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 5-91 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO 5.0 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There were no speakers present wishing to present testimony. 6.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 6.1 Potato Festival City Manager Easter gave a brief staff report outlining the requests of the Business Association. Advised the location for the festival would be the Farmer's Corner and required no road closures. The Business Association has requested the City to provide security, portable sinks and toilets, coordinate trash collection, and a waiver of all fees and permits. City Police Staff will work with the gun shop owner on requirements for an old time gunfight and this issue will come back to Council on October 8th for the necessary actions to permit the discharge of firearms within the City limits. The Business Association is working with adjacent property owners to secure additional parking and will provide liability insurance with the City of San Jacinto named additional insured. The Business Association requested the City, in lieu of not being able to negotiate the business license fee, to waive the $25.00 per vendor to recoup lost sales tax, and have agreed to pay $5.00 per craft vendor and $10.00 per food vendor. City Manager Easter, in response to Council concerns, advised that the Business Association will work with Police Staff on setting the routes for races, taking in safety concerns (San Jacinto/Menlo) and will discuss with the association the arrangements for security. Robert Alva, 2507 S. San Jacinto, spoke as a business owner who was looking forward to having the festival, however, sorry that it did not work out in another area. George Evans indicated concurrence with Mr. Alva. Marcello Olivas, Vice President of the Business Association and Chairman of the Potato Festival was available for questions. In response to Council, advised the Bicycle race was canceled and would work with City 5 staff on other planned activities. With regard to security, felt the visibility of the police would be important. Police would be needed from Noon to Midnight on Saturday and Noon to 8:00 P.M. Sunday only. Resident of Hemet, San Jacinto business owner on Main Street, stated some merchants were disappointed with the new location, hoped this would not hinder future opportunities in the Main Street area. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Richards, seconded by Councilmember Ford to provide security and other items requested in the staff report (list 1-8) in an amount not to exceed the budgeted amount of $5,000 to support the festivities. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote. Council consensus to agree to the $5.00 per craft vendor and $10.00 per food vendor in lieu of the $25.00 business license. 6.2 School Fees Presentation City Manager Easter advised that additional material was made available and anyone who had not received it could obtain it at City Hall the following morning. Introduced Ernesto Flores, City Consultant to work on the financing concept. Ernesto Flores, Caldwell, Flores, Winters, Inc., made a presentation using the overhead to visually present the tables contained in the handouts. Generally reviewed the report and gave a summary of the content. The report gave an overview of exiting and future facility needs, the alternatives for financing and the likelihood of available resources. Explained the criteria for the determinations made, along with state standards and requirements. In response to Council inquiry, Mr. Flores explained that the Developers data differed because it takes 6-8 years for children to fully occupy housing and that is how their report, presented that evening, was projected, as opposed to the developers using a random sampling. Mr. Flores advised they did not focus on just existing so as not to put the entire burden on new development alone. Stated the market is very slow at this time. Advised the imposition of a one time tax would have broader uses for the funds. It is proposed, effective July 1, 1992, a revised per square foot charge of $1.66. Additional options are partial funding through RDA and general obligation bonds. 6 Exempt from the cost, at the time, are senior housing and commercial which pay a one time fee less than single family. Senior housing exemption validity protected through CC&R's deed restrictions, some risk, but are hard to change later. Mr. Flores further advised that a total exemption was not considered equitable by builders, but rather a one time fee at permit stage and not a recurring annual tax. In response to Council questions, Mr. Flores advised that a buy out provision had not been considered. Explained that General Obligation Bonds required a 2/3 majority of registered voters. Estimated the bonds would generate $5-6 million. Ms. Sanders, Caldwell, Flores, Winters, Inc., explained the cooperative agreement and ordinance. Council consensus that more time is needed to absorb the writ- ten material presented this evening before making a decision. Harry Bigham agreed to meet with Mr. Flores to address some questions and then come back to Council with any concerns. Feels all developers have concerns and wish more time to review the material presented and then have an opportunity to address concerns. Impact of this action will have an effect on the community for the next 5-10 years. Greg Weiler, 2603 Main Street, Irvine. Felt the developers were at a disadvantage since they just received the material. Would like to know why staff feels they cannot float a General Obligation Bond? With regard to the Mello Roos, felt by being forced to participate, were not being granted the right to vote in opposition when the time comes. Submitted a letter for the record. Would await next meeting for additional comments. Mr. Flores explained, for the benefit of everyone, the voting process for the Mello Roos. Steven Gall, USA Properties, advised he was unclear on the impact on multi -family units. Questioned what criteria was used to determine who participates in the district. Since he would be retaining his units for a number of years, the cost of the Mello Roos would come direct from his pocket, and a 15- 20% increase would be extremely burdensome, especially since he was ready to pull permits. Curt Ensign, Premier Homes stated there were very sensitive issues important to the community. Felt there was a need to move forward in a responsible way and provide facilities needed by the residents. Identified the following areas of concern: 7 1. The overall legality of the issue on the method of implementation and conditioning of projects in conjunction with the CEQA requirements for school facilities. 2. Concerned whether the terms were realistic, and whether the market could absorb such costs. Stated individual lots had a value of $7,000 less than the purchase price. Would cause developing the land to be cost prohibitive. 3. Concerned with the fairness of the program which put 80% of the cost on future homeowners. Builders would support General Obligations Bonds which is a fairer method. 4. Finally, the concern that all remaining capacity for taxing would be utilized for schools and there will be no remaining for future use for public facilities, drainage, fire and police, to name a few, for the next 30 years. Jerry Rice, 163 Eat Main Street, agreed school facilities were important issues for the community and needs to be resolved correctly. Builders have pledged their personal and financial support for General Obligation Bonds and hoped the city would take a strong look at the possibility. There was a need to provide an opportunity to pay off up front rather than paying over the period of 30 years. And finally, that the City secure future needs for infrastructure. Dave Cottington, 1655 East Sixth, Corona, Peacock Radaker. Suggested a meeting be held with the developers and Mr. Flores to obtain clarification on the report and a meeting later with Council so developers would have the opportunity to voice their concerns prior to Council action. It was agreed by all a meeting with Mr. Ernesto Flores will be held on September 23, 1991, at 10:00 A.M. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Ford, seconded by Councilmember Leahy to continue this matter to a special session on September 26, 1991, at 6:00 P.M. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote. 6.3 Extension of Time - Tract 22665 (Palomar S & L) Second Extension of Time - Continued from 9/3/91 - McNabb Located at the southwest corner of Palm Avenue and Seventh Street. Senior Planner Hults gave a brief staff report. Staff felt the city should be consistent with mitigation measures. Stated the project was located in the Hemet School District and that the City may want to work on an agreement with them as well. 8 Don Morris, 45701 Classic Way, Temecula. Stated this was the first he was aware his project was in the Hemet School District, inquired regarding the boundary? Bill Marshall, San Jacinto School District, advised this project was right at the boundary of the two districts. Mr. Morris advised that he must still come back for recordation and if there are concerns, Council would still have the opportunity to address at that time. City Attorney Cox advised he does,iot believe the City could impose the Mello Roos requirement on suL(k•44..e., i � � wr L" "7. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Richards, seconded by Councilmember Hafliger to approve the extension of time with the additional condition of approval "Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall pay all school mitigation fees mandated by Government Code Section 65995". Motion carried on a 3-2 vote with Councilmembers Ford and Hafliger dissenting. 6.4 Final Maps 6.4.1 Tract Map 26729 (Rymco Framing) Located at the northwest corner of Evans Street and Las Rosas Drive Senior Planner Hults gave a brief staff report recommending approval with the language that no occupancy be granted unless said lot is in a school facilities district, as stated in the staff report. Harry Bigham advised that one of the issues was the cutoff date which was unclear in the documentation by Mr. Flores. There should be a level playing field and if at the time of final map the Mello Roos has not been formed then final map should be granted. It is not the developers fault the School District did not form the Mello Roos. This would apply only to hundreds of units and not thousands, so the impact would be minimal. Clarified for Council, that at the time of occupancy would be too late, their buyers need to know earlier in the process. Lugi Izzi, 328 De Anza Drive, stated he recently purchased a home in Premier tract, and was just now learning about a possible Mello Roos. Was not aware at the time of purchase and was opposed to the requirement. 9 Rochelle Perry 29626 Camino Delores, Sun City, was also a buyer in the Premier tract, and learned just that evening of a possible Mello Roos. The home was bought three months ago and unaware of a Mello Roos and chooses not to be part of a Mello Roos. Felt this would deter young families from relocating in San Jacinto. Curt Ensign, Premier Homes, advised that the two buyers put a deposit on their homes five months ago and he was not aware of a condition for participation in a Mello Roos at that time. There was a need for conditions which would address the issue but should not be imposed as a condition at the final map stage. They have submitted bonds and pulled grading permits months ago and have been waiting for a reasonable program to come forward. His interpretation of the state law was the imposition of a $1.58 per square foot fee to mitigate school issues, and the purpose was so money would be advanced early in the process. A Mello Roos does not give the School District time to build and the fee would. City Attorney Cox advised that he previously stated it was not legal to add conditions at final map stage. The need for a Mello Roos was communicated early in the process. The tentative map condition was to join an assessment district to finance school facilities. Voiced concern that the developer was selling lots prior to a recorded map and a possible violation of the Subdivision Map Act, and the sale of lots without informing the buyers of the Mello Roos requirement. Curt Ensign advised he was not aware of this condition 5 months ago. Did not understand the economics of the school situation, the planning for this should have been at the appropriate time. The map was first approved in September, 1989. He did not discuss these issues with the School District because he was unaware of a crowding problem. In response to Council, Mr. Cox had not seen the actual conditions of approval, but was going by information contained in a memo from staff. As for conditions being applied since June, 1990, staff advised that there have been a number of different statements, all with the same implication regarding school fees. Larry Martin, 1584 Napa Court, advised he had already met all the conditions to date, put in all off -site improvements, sidewalks, utilities and is ready to build. The elderly seller needs to close escrow and cannot without a final map. This project involves four new lots and one existing. Requested action on this matter 10 without further delay and that the Mello Roos condition be dropped. This project is bordered by three other tracts not conditioned which would result in a five home isolated island with one existing elderly resident. Felt burdening the new home buyers was not fair. Ms. Sanders clarified for the Council that the existing resident would also be in the district and the assessment would be applicable. There would be isolated instances where this may be the result. Jerry Rice, 163 East Main Street, spoke on behalf of Mr. Martin and the financial hardship this would cause him. The current owner, Mrs. Croy, is 84 years old and would not vote to join the Mello Roos district. Four lots would not impact the schools. Applicant needed to record and pull permits to retain his career. Greg Weiler advised the Council that Premier Home sales were in full compliance with the law. Stated all property owners could vote, according to the law, but developers would be denied that right to vote by virtue of the mandatory consent to participate in a Mello Roos to gain approval of their maps. Their choices were additional taxes or bankruptcy. Language states "if required by Council to participate" and yet there was no ordinance or policy in effect to allow imposition of anything of this nature at the time the tentative map application was filed, and nothing was in effect to date. Felt this was clearly a new condition or modification to conditions. Mr. Weiler further stated that staff has recommended insertion of the language on the face of the map and Government Code prohibits this language on the face of a map. The request for approval of a final map' was ministerial and the City was compelled to comply. It was not lawful to impose the additional language now. His position was that this did not involve legislative approval and therefore the City could not impose the Mello Roos requirement. The law clearly indicated the limitation for school fees at $1.58 per square foot. Finally, the agreement called for indemnification of the City and should also include indemnification of the developers. Requested final map approvals without the additional language. Stated a tentative map was judicatory and not legislative. 11 In response to Council inquiry regarding legality, Mr. Cox advised there was no case authority considering that type of situation. Believed the creation of a tentative map was a legislative act which would allow creation of a Mello Roos to mitigate school impacts.rf Cited a recent - case regarding the San Francisco Transit District. - Regarding the sale of lots, the Subdivision Map ActIU stated the developer must obtain a report from the�,,:11 Department of Real Estate, which could not be obtainedy,1._r. until the tract was lawfully created. Felt either way, the City was looking at litigation, either from the developers or the school district. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember Richards to approve final tract map 26729 (Rymco Framing) and authorize recordation subject only to the $1.58 per square foot school mitigation fee mandated in the Government Code. Motion carried on a 4-1 vote with Councilmember Ford dissenting. 6.4.2 Tract Map 24907 (Premier Homes) Located between the proposed Ramona Expressway and Mountain Avenue, immediately north of the intersection of Meridian Street and Commonwealth Avenue. 6.4.3 Tract Map 24907-2 (Premier Homes) Located between the proposed Ramona Expressway and Mountain Avenue, immediately north of the intersection of Meridian Street and Commonwealth Avenue. Bill Marshall, School District, concerned that Premier Homes was unaware of school needs and the Mello Roos participation, particularly since they had been meeting on this issue since February, 1991. Even though the language was foggy, the understanding had been clear as to participation in a financing district. The only questions had been what level of participation and how much. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Hafliger, seconded by Councilmember Ford to approve final tract map 24907 and 24907-2 and authorize recordation subject to the additional wording "Participate in financing district for schools, if so required by the City Council". Motion carried on a 3-2 vote with Councilmembers Leahy and Richards dissenting. 12 At the hour of 11:10 P.M. the City Council recessed. At the hour of 11:20 P.M. the City Council reconvened with all Councilmembers present. 6.5 Landscape Maintenance Contract Public Works Director Evans gave a brief staff report. Explained the price differences and recommended the award be shared by two contractors. In response to Council, staff would inquire if work could be accomplished without the use of blowers. Suggestion was made for the use of vacuums. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember Hafliger to rescind the award of contract to Custom Yards of Hemet for Areas H and J for failure to enter into a contract; and Award contracts to perform landscape maintenance to E & E Gardening for area J in an amount not to exceed $2,400 per month, and award Cherokee Landscape Service of San Bernardino, for Areas H, Soboba and Idyllwild in an amount not to exceed $8,350 per month. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote. 6 6 Lighting and Landscape Consultant Public Works Director Evans gave a brief staff report. Advised the Council the action would complete transition of those costs to the tax roll. Further, the process could also include other plans and suggested the possibility of a citizen committee to address concerns. Stated that although the work could be done in house, the city lacked the necessary equipment and staff time. Further action by the Council would not be necessary until July, 1992. Staff would bring back a list of those other plans for consideration of consultants. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Hafliger, seconded by Councilmember Ford to approve selection of GFB - Friedrich and Associates to provide assessment engineering services for the city-wide lighting and landscaping assessment districts for a fee not to exceed $19,500 and authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement. Motion carried on a 3-2 vote with Councilmember Richards and Mayor Boykin dissenting. 13 6.7 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Council consensus to dispense with the matter as it was a staff issue. 6.8 Downtown Water Line Proiect - Default B & Sons (Continued from 8/27/91) Public Works Director Evans advised that B & Sons had contacted the City and agreed to complete the work and negotiate funds at a later date. A MOT -ION was made by Mayor Boykin, seconded by Councilmember Hafliger to continue this matter to the meeting of October 8, 1991. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote. 7.0 MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS 7.1 Soboba Tribal Council Road Access - Richards/Ford Councilmember Richards clarified the access issue and the land ownership. City Attorney Cox advised of his knowledge based on maps shown to him by Mr. Morgan. Councilmember Hafliger requested that the record reflect his concerns regarding this matter. 7.2 Communications Site Councilmember Hafliger requested that the record reflect his opposition to this acquisition. City Attorney Cox suggested Council convene in closed session to discuss the tetius of escrow. Mr. Cox needed to know what terms of escrow were absolute and if Council desired to continue paying Mr. Morgan during the time these issues are being resolved, which may be significant. 8.0 CLOSED SESSION At the hour of 11:50 P.M. the City Council convened in Closed Session for potential litigation pursuant nme to Goverode t Section 54956.9. l�� nt44 At the hour of 1:05 A.M. the City Council convened in Open Session with no action being taken. 14 9.0 ADJOURNMENT A MOTION was made by Councilmember Hafliger, seconded by Councilmember Leahy to adjourn to September 24, 1991 at 6:00 p.m. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Councilmember Ford absent. The hour of adjournment being 1:05 A.M. Submitted by Maurice Armster, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk 15 Approved by Francis R. Boykin, Mayor MINUTES SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY September 4, 1991 1.0 CALL TO ORDER The Adjourned Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council convened at 8:00 A.M. at the Double Tree Hotel, Temecula, California. Present: Councilmembers Hafliger, Leahy, Richards and Mayor Boykin Absent: Councilmember Ford (present for a portion of the session due to a prior committment) A Moment of Silence was observed for Reflection Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Boykin 2.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2.1 Review of Exclusive Right to Negotiate Agreements A MOTION was made by Councilmember Hafliger, seconded by Councilmember Leahy to continue this matter to a special meeting on September 6, 1991. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote. 2.2 Assessment District 87-1 A MOTION was made by Councilmember Hafliger, seconded by Councilmember Leahy to approve the September, 1991, interest payment in the amount of $97,000. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Councilmember Ford absent. 2.3 Retreat 3.0 ADJOURNMENT A MOTION was made by Councilmember Hafliger, seconded by Councilmember Leahy to adjourn to September 6, 1991 at 3:30 P.M. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote. The hour of adjournment being 5:35 P.M. on September 5, 1991. Submitted by Approved by Deputy City Clerk Francis R. Boykin, Mayor MINUTES SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY September 6, 1991 1.0 CALL TO ORDER The Adjourned Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council convened at 3:30 P.M. at the San Jacinto City Hall, 201 East Main Street, San Jacinto, California. Present: Councilmembers Hafliger, Leahy, Richards and Mayor Boykin Absent: Councilmember Ford A Moment of Silence was observed for Reflection Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Boykin 2.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2.1 Review of Exclusive Right to Negotiate Agreement A MOTION was made and seconded to approve the Exclusive Right to Negotiate agreement with Patton Development. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Councilmember Ford absent. 3.0 ADJOURNMENT A MOTION was made to adjourn to September 24, 1991 at 6:00 P.M. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote. The hour of adjournment being 4:00 P.M. Submitted by Approved by Deputy City Clerk Francis R. Boykin, Mayor 2 /Vs /9/ MINUTES SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY September 24, 1991 1.0 CALL TO ORDER The Adjourned Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council convened at 6:00 P.M. at the San Jacinto City Hall, 201 East Main Street, San Jacinto, California. Present: Councilmembers Ford, Hafliger, Leahy, Richards and Mayor Boykin Absent: None A Moment of Silence was observed for Reflection Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Boykin 2.0 ORDER OF BUSINESS 2.1 Closed Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 for City Manager evaluation. 3.0 ADJOURNMENT Meeting was adjourned to October 1, 1991 at 6:00 P.M. The hour of adjournment being 7:30 P.M. Submitted by Approved by Deputy City Clerk Francis R. Boykin, Mayor 3 MINUTES SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY October 1, 1991 The Special Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 6:00 P.M. at the City Hall, 316 East Main Street, San Jacinto, California. Present: Councilmembers Ford, Hafliger, Leahy, Richards and Mayor Boykin Absent: None 1.0 ORDER OF BUSINESS 1.1 Teen Fest '91 - Banner Approval A MOTION was made by Councilmember Ford, seconded by Councilmember Leahy to authorize hanging the banner over Main Street at San Jacinto Boulevard and direct staff to prepare a policy on banners. Motion carried on 5-0 vote. 1.2 Closed Session for Personnel (City Manager Evaluation) pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 and Pending Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (a) Calderon vs. City of San Jacinto. Reconvened in open session and announced the following action was taken regarding the City Manager: A MOTION was made by Councilmember Hafliger, seconded by Councilmember Ford to authorize Step 2 of Range 87. Motion carried on a 4-1 vote with Councilmember Leahy dissenting. 2.0 ADJOURNMENT A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember Richards to adjourn the meeting. The hour of adjournment being 10:05 p.m. Submitted by Approved by Maurice Armster, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk Francis R. Boykin, Mayor COACH ELLA VALLEY JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY September 13, 1991 Pamela L. Lee, CMC City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 RE: Claims Acknowledgement and Loss Advice Dear Ms. Lee: We are in receipt of the below captioned claim and wish to inform you of our assigned file number: Claimant: Jane Masuda Date of Loss: 08/18/91 Our Assigned File #: JS 92-02 We request that you take the action indicated below: EX] CLAIM REJECTION BY TITLE OF BOARD OR OFFICER: Written rejection of claim in accordance with Government Code Section 913. l ] CLAIM REJECTION BY OPERATION OF LAW: Written rejection of claim in accordance with Government Code Section 913. I] E] E] E] E] LATE CLAIN: Do NOT reject claim but RETURN it for failure to file within time limit prescribed in Government Code Section 911.2. Transmittal NOT to contain "WARNING" required by Section 913, but should advise that the recourse to file "Application for Leave to File Late Claim" as provided in Government Code Section 911.4. This must be returned within 45 days of the date claim mailed or delivered. INSUFFICIENT CLAIM: Send notice of insufficiency for failure to comply with Government Code Section 910 and/or 910.2 and/or 910.4 and cite the following specific insufficiencies: AMENDED CLAIM: Reject claim as set forth in first paragraph above, CLAIM REJECTION BY TITLE OF BOARD OR OFFICER. APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE CLAIM: Reject the Application under Government Code Section 911.8. OPERATION OF LAW: Defer any written response pending our further advice. Please provide us with a copy of any response requested above. If you have any questions, please contact the CVJPIA office. Sincerely, Scott Ellerbrock Claims Specialist 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 200, Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 341-0492 FAX (619) 340-5949 r7C//(/d O@ ' / CARL WART ' e & CO. insurance Adjusters Claims Administrators P.O. Box 6205 San Bernardino, CA 92412 (714) 884-8669 (714) 624-1660 FAX (714) 888-4888 City of San Jacinto P. 0. Box 488 San Jacinto, CA 92383 Attn: Pam Easter Gentlemen: September 16, OFFICES: Glendale (Home Office) Bakersfield Calabasas Covina Fresno Long Beach 1991 CLAIMANT: Virgil Kosmicki DATE OF INCIDENT: 3/26/91 DATE CLAIM MADE: 9/12/91 OUR FILE NO' 14134 SG Sacramento San Bernardino San Diego San Luis Obispo Santa Ana j Santa Barbara Ventura We have reviewed the above claim which you have reported and request that you take the action indicated below: x431 CLAIM REJECTION: Reject claim in accordance with Government Code, section 913. 0 LATE CLAIM: Do NOT reject claim but RETURN it for failure to file within time limit prescribed in Government Code, section 911.2. Transmittal NOT to contain "WARNING" required by section 913 but should advise that the recourse is to file "Application for Leave to File Late Claim" as provided in Government Code, section 911.4. This must be returned within 45 days of the date claim mailed or delivered. ❑ INSUFFICIENT CLAIM: Send notice of insufficiency for failure to comply with Government Code, section 910 and/or 910.2 and/or 910.4 and cite the following specific insufficiencies: This must be sent within 20 days of your receipt of claim. ❑ AM ENDED CLAIM: Reject claim as set forth in first paragraph above, CLAIM REJECTION. ❑ APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE CLAIM: Reject the Application under Government Code, section 911.8. ❑ OPERATION OF LAW: Defer any written response pending our further advice. Please provide us with a copy of any response requested above. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, CARL WARREN & COMPANY Stephen T. Gooch CW-N4a CITY OF SAN JACINTO REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS FIRST INTERSTATE BANK A/C 201398000 ISSUED TO *Stallas Delicatessen *O.K. Associates *CNOA *League of Ca Cities *IREM *Crafton Hills College *Crafton Hills College *Crafton Hills College *Primo Reynoso *H.E. & Maxine Divine *Southern Calif. Gas *Southern Calif. Edison *Southern Calif. Gas *Southern Calif. Edison *Southern Calif. Edison *Southern Calif. Gas *The Carpet Man *League of CA Cities *Southern Calif. Gas *Southern Calif. Edison *Southern Calif. Edison *Southern Calif. Gas *Southern Calif. Edison *Southern Calif. Gas *City of Perris *Office of State Treas. *Domino Pizza *Lawrence Preston *Southern Calif. Gas *Southern Calif. Edison *Anna Vega *Southern Calif. Gas *Southern Calif. Edison *Southern Calif. Gas *Southern Calif. Edison *Dave Davidson *Riv Co Econ Dev Agency *Mike Chestnut *Mike Chestnut *3 Day Blinds *Riv. Credit Union DESCRIPTION Breakfast - Russians Refuse Collection Registration - Rodriguez Conference - F. Boykin Subscription -Mobile Parks Fire Prevention Class - Reynoso Fire Prevention Class - Reynoso Fire Command Class - Reynoso Fire Mgmt. I Class - Reynoso (2) months rent -City Annex Payment Collection Payment Collection Payment Collection Payment Collection Payment Collection Payment Collection Carpeting - City Annex Dinner Meeting-J & K Leahy Payment Collection Payment Collection Payment Collection Payment Collection Payment Collection Payment Collection Conference - J & K Leahy Seminar - K. Leahy Move - City Annex P.O.S.T. Training Issues Payment Collection Payment Collection Office Supplies - City Annex Payment Collection Payment Collection Payment Collection Payment Collection Police Reserve Services Luncheon Mtg. - J. Richards Supplies - PACE Coffee Supplies - PACE Mini blinds - City Annex Credit Union Deductions PAGE 1 9-30-91 AMOUNT 120.00 75,378.63 205.00 75.00 38.45 12.50 12.50 12.00 17.50 2,116.80 244.22 1,297.21 520.16 2,769.80 2,006.92 481.07 3,380.00 40.00 273.02 1,065.82 914.51 198.60 679.27 208.65 38.00 20.00 42.01 204.00 192.61 735.09 120.23 85.10 309.57 120.17 433.85 72.00 18.50 225.00 70.00 499.96 1,924.00 CITY OF SAN JACINTO REGISTER OF AUDITED FUNDS *Public Empl. of Riv PERC Dues *San Jacinto PD Assoc. Police Dues *ICMA Retirement Deferred Comp *Southern Calif. Gas Payment Collection *Southern Calif. Edison Payment Collection *City of SJ Petty Cash Replenish Petty Cash *EDC Luncheon Econ. Dev. Council Mtg *Jolene Shaw Supplies - City Annex *Southern Calif. Gas Payment Collection *Southern Calif. Edison Payment Collection *City of Banning Mayor & Councilmember Conf *Southern Calif. Edison Payment Collection *Southern Calif. Gas Payment Collection *SJ Chamber of Commerce City Contributions *Southern Calif. Edison Payment Collection *Southern Calif. Gas Payment Collection *CAWAER League Conf. - J. Leahy *City of Banning Councilmembers Conf. - J. *Public Empl. Retirement PERS Retirement *League of CA Cities *League of CA Cities *Health Net *Blue Cross of CA *Southern Calif. Edison *Southern Calif. Gas *U.S. Postmaster *Stiles, Marissa *Lisardo, Ray AT&T A. VanGoethen ADCO Alta Nursery Alpha Beta Amistad Assoc. Anadys Trophies Arrow Printing Arroyo, Louis Jr. AT&T Language Line Babcock, Edward & Sons Backlund, Barry Bang, Dave Assoc. Beaumont Concrete BIA/NAHRO Housing Bills Locksmith Blue Ribbon Plumbing Bobs Lumber CVJPIA CA Apt. Association Printing J. Leahy J. Richards Health Insurance Health Ins.- MacAdam Payment Collection Payment Collection Replenish Postage Meter Training Seminar - Communications Cabinets - City Annex Long Distance Service PD Forms Chainsaws Trees - LLMD/PKWYS Russians/School Mtgs. Staff & Council Retreat Clock - Russian Visitors Printing Services Janitorial Service Language Line Service Water Samples POST Class - Supervisor Leadership Park Benches - Hoffman Park Concrete/Sidewalk Main St. Housing Conference Notebook Key filing cabinets Plumbing Services PD Lumber - Water Workers Comp Liability Quarterly Report - Apartments - C.M. PAGE 2 9-30-91 388.68 526.00 1,160.00 95.70 134.79 148.64 18.50 150.00 166.34 220.51 - Ford 20.00 254.05 147.13 7,500.00 325.41 133.16 15.00 Richards 20.00 18,360.42 15.00 15.00 18,733.44 71.00 742.03 286.93 925.00 72.50 905.00 1.37 857.39 1,038.58 494.52 75.42 2,485.50 118.52 1,463.23 1,800.00 25.00 764.00 246.00 683.52 442.24 31.75 61.05 542.78 29.77 92,530.00 50.00 CITY OF SAN JACINTO REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS Ca Police Chief Assoc. Ca State Board of Equal. Calif. Water Awareness Castellano's Towing CED Chadwick, Ross Cherokee Landscape Chestnut, Mike Chlorco Com Ser Co Comtronix Stella Pedroza Bill Dodd Steven Trost Mel Nortune William Marshall Valley Properties Jesse Rodriguez Hemet Federal Tina Falls Elva Aguilera Dave Mesaros Curtis, L.N & Sons Dahlman, Danielle Damon Reference Lab. Davidson, J.F. DeBros Blueprinting Denney, R. Bruce Dill Lumber Deyo, Bryan Dynamed EMWD Fields & Creason First Interstate Bank First Municipal FMC Corporation Fontana Paving GKN Rentals GTEL General Telephone GTE Mobile Comm. Gurnea G. Guzman, Manuel Harsany, John MD Hicks, Randy Hemet Heating & Cooling Hemet News Hi Standard Automotive Association Dues Fees Due Annexation 60 Membership - Water Towing Services - P.D. Light Bulbs - Streets Retreat/Office Supplies Landscape Maintenance/LLMD Associate Planner Chlorinating Kit - Water Radio Maintenance - P.D. Installation/Radio - Water Consumer Deposit Refund Consumer Deposit Refund Consumer Deposit Refund Consumer Deposit Refund Consumer Deposit Refund Consumer Deposit Refund Consumer Deposit Refund Consumer Deposit Refund Consumer Deposit Refund Consumer Deposit Refund Consumer Deposit Refund Uniform Equipment - FD Overpayment - Water Arrest/Drug Tests - P.D. Engineering Fees Blueprinting Services Building Inspector Building Materials - City Annex Class Reimbursement - F.D. Supplies - FD Utilities Legal Services - Haloski Claim City Managers Expense Broomsweeper Lease Sweeper Parts Class II Base - Streets Rental of Backhoe - Streets Phone Rental - P.D. Phone Service - All Dept. Monthly Service - McNabb Reimb. Picture Frame/ Comm Ctr. Consumer Deposit Refund Pre -Employment Physical Exams P.O.S.T. Supervis. Leadership Air Conditioning Service Legal Advertising Repairs - Unit 102 - P.D. PAGE3 9-30-91 100.00 320.00 150.00 167.50 1,510.46 1,331.38 3,400.00 3,078.00 142.56 812.60 160.88 29.53 2.55 2.87 50.00 17.81 5.44 24.91 1.94 8.52 10.10 11.94 187.49 63.77 169.89 1,411.18 57.92 1,590.00 947B 110.00 302.E2 63,039.36 332.50 31.49 1,565.25 335.22 36.42 160.00 574.42 3,413.83 122.09 12.18 50.00 266.00 246.00 300.00 136.13 212.33 CITY OF SAN JACINTO REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS Hillcrest Trees Holderbaum, Chris House of Quality Auto Burleys Auto Hubbs Stationery IBM Corp. Industrial Asphalt Jeffs, Cynthia Jobs Available Johnson, D.J. JM Air Conditioning Karls Tractor Service Kelley Blue Book Kennedy Court Reporting Kleinfelder, Inc. Krause, Shirley Lab Safety Supply Lakeside Chevrolet League of CA Cities Leahy, Jan Lee, Pamela Leahy, Kenneth Liebert/Cassidy/Frierson Longs Drug Stores Luna, Jose MFS Melcom Communications Moore Business Forms Mt. San Jacinto Welding Newport Wave NBS Lowry Nadel Partnership Overnight Supply Pac Tel Physicians Desk Ref. Perez, Maria Pagenet Phoenix Program Inc. Hixson, Richard Iacono, Yvonne Rutledge, William Taylor, Glenn Ver Plank, David Pacific A-1 Fire Equip. Polar Bear Radiator Quala Tel Enterprises Regional Training Ctr. Trees - Main St. PKWY Overpayment - Water Auto Parts - Various Emergency Lights, Engine 641 Office Supplies - P.D. Maintenance Line Printer Cold Mix - Streets Part-time Help - Comm. Dev. Ad - Asst. Bldg. Official Design - City Annex Air Conditioning - City Annex Weed Abatement Renewal Car Guide - P.D. Depositions - Claims Consulting - Solid Waste Deposition - Calderon Claim FD Supplies Repairs - Unit 109 - P.D. Association Dues - Inland Empire Reimbursement - Film Deputy City Clerk Services Reimburse - Airfare/Sacramento Legal - Labor Neogtiations Polaroid Film - P.D. Mileage Reimbursement Assessment Dist. 87-1 - Admin Batteries - Vehicles Water Bills Repair Jail Cell Computer Network Engineering Services Superblock Masterplan Janitorial Supplies Celluar Phones - P.D./C.M. Desk Reference Books P.D. Consumer Deposit Refund Rental of Pagers - F. D. CDBG Funds, Satelite House Planning Commissioner Planning Commissioner Planning Commissioner Planning Commissioner Planning Commissioner Fire Extinguishers - City Annex Recore Radiator - Unit 102 P.D. Fire Dept. Supplies POST - Warner - Police Budgets PAGE 4 9-30-91 431.00 25.05 1,655.83 59.16 26.70 201.00 200.93 497.00 105.00 870.00 321.09 185.00 52.55 848.00 8,676.00 144.20 210.20 145.73 100.00 13.77 1,657.50 42.82 743.75 213.90 65.78 1,114.57 304.39 743.60 320.85 12,732.13 57,674.59 4,930.39 1,765.60 1,576.07 107.64 50.00 183.83 3,000.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 239.58 253.21 3,497.74 393.00 CITY OF SAN JACINTO REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS Resource Directory Rickman, Samuel Rheingans Tractor Riverside Blueprint Rose, Linda Jo Salsgiver, Bonnie SJ Valley School/Arts Senior Day Care Ctr. Safety Kleen Corp. San Diego Rotary Broom SJ Chamber of Commerce Sharps Building Scotsman Group Inc. Shaw, Jolene Small Animal Hospital Shell Oil Co. Southern Calif. Edison Southern Counties Oil Sparkletts Steves Auto Parts State Materials Unique Floral Creation Valley Restart Shelter Valle Vista Printing Vallen Safety Supply Warner, Dennis Warren, Carl & co. Wedin Enterprises West, Mike Western Nure Specialists Blood Draws - P.D. Winans/Lee Partnership Overpayments - Water Write Price Office Supplies - Civic 1990-91 Resource Directory A/C Euthanasia Training Tractor Service Blueprinting Services Reimburse/Book 18.30 Refund Deposit CDBG Funds CDBG Funds Supplies Sweeper Parts City Contributions Building Supplies Rental - Mobile Office - PD Reimbursement - Supplies Physicians Exams - Animal Fuel - City Manager Utilities Unleaded Gas Drinking Water Auto Parts Cement/Supplies Floral Arangement - Ford CDBG Funds PAGE 5 - 9-30-91 40.62 41.75 258.75 75.00 38.78 3,000.00 4,000.00 138.50 204.42 7,500.00 1,788.70 1,743.40 31.89 Control 16.43 21.08 5,609.88 8,190.03 47.07 695.95 40.51 26.40 3,000.00 Job Flyers - Asst. Bldg Official 155.16 Repair Breathing Apparatus - F.D. 6.91 POST - Police Budgets 410.00 Claim Administrator 2,102.06 Consulting Services - Econ. Dev. 625.00 Overpayment - Water 214.77 90.00 64.15 5.76 FINAL TOTAL $486,561.62 /746/ c'/--) Gyy /77 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 7-91 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby amended by adding thereto Change of Zone 7-91 as herein set forth. Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the City of San Jacinto shown on the attached map marked Exhibit "A" made a part hereof, is hereby established as R-P, Residential Professional. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 3rd day of September 1991 by the following vote: MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 1991 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor A'FTEST: City Clerk CERTIFICATE STAIE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of 1991. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of 1991. City Clerk /. % e/21 C , / /6/0/ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 5-91 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby amended by adding thereto Change of Zone 5-91 as herein set forth. Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the City of San Jacinto shown on the attached map marked Exhibit "A" made a part hereof, is hereby established as R-1, Single Family. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 3rd day of September 1991 by the following vote: MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 1991 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor AT['EST: City Clerk -1- CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of 1991. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of 1991. City Clerk - 2 - // /°/0,/ DATE: October 8, 1991 TO; Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Les Evans, Interim Public Works Director SUBJECT: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NP DES ) Storm Water Discharge Permit/Implementation Agreement RECOMMENDATION: Approve the NPDES Storm Water Discharge Implementation Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. In 1987 Congress enacted the Water Quality Act which established requirements for regulating storm water run-off. The local permitting authority is the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District). The District has established an assessment district to raise funds to develop a permit and inspection process. The amount to be assessed in 1991-92 will be $2.86 for a typical residential lot and more for larger properties. In addition, the District is asking the County and nine cities within the District to sign an Implementation Agreement. The agreement sets out duties and responsibilities for the District, County and nine cities in the implementation of the NPDES. Primarily, the City of San Jacinto will be required to provide existing data and reports regarding storm water discharge. In addition, the City may be required to pay it share of any consultants fees. RECOMMENDATION::.,: Award the Grand Avenue Well > Equipment Conversion contract to Beylik Drilli.ng, Inc. in the amount -of $53 309.00=and authorize theCity Manager to execute a _-contract on behalf of.t City. The City has entered into an agreement, with the Southern California Edison Company (SCE) to participate in Edison's Electric Motor Program. Edison will pay to the City $70,441 for replacing. the`! _internal combustion engines at the Grand -Avenue ° Well with electric motors. The advantage to the Edison Company is gaining "Credits"" from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and gaining anther customer. The advantage to the City is a no -cost conversion and avoidance of costly internal combustion engine modifications to meet SCAQMD requirements. Therefore, the City has solicitod bids for the Grand Avenue Well Conversion Project. Bids were opened at 2:00 P.M. on October 2, 1991. The following bids were received: McCalla $80,949.00 Foothill Engineering $89,992.00 Beylik Drilling, Inc. $53,309.00 The funding for this conversion will be reimbursed fully by SCE 471, / /; /y/ or and City Council terim Public Works Director ate -Local Partnership Program :Esplanade,, Street --Widening RECOMMENDATION:' Adopt Resolution ,No. approving State -Local Transportation Partnership Program Agreement No. SLTPP-5075 and Program Supplement No. 001 for the _Esplanade Avenue Street Widening Project. ANALYSIS: The City has been awarded a grant of $138,614 from the State -Local Partnership Program funds for it's Esplanade Street Widening Project between State Street and San Jacinto Boulevard. The project was previously awarded by the City Council and is scheduled to begin construction shortly. In order to receive funds the state requires that the City enter into an agreement insuring that the City will abide by State -Local Partnership Program policies, procedures and guidelines. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION..OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY SAN`JACINTOCALIFORNIA, APPROVING STATE -LOCAL MASTERAGREEMENT NO. SLTPP-5075'AND PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 001 AND AUTHORIZING THEIR EXECUTION. BE IT RESOLVED that the State -Local Master AgreementNo. SLTPP-5075 (pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 2600:et seq.)"'and Program Supplement No. 001 are hereby approved and execution of the Agreement and Supplement and any other necessary documents are hereby authorized. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of October, 1991. Francis R. Boykin, Mayor ATTEST: Maurice Armster, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk If Maurice Armster, City Clerk of. the. City of San Jacinto, California, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted at a meeting of the City Council of said City at its meeting held on the 8th day of October, 1991, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Jacinto, California this day of October, 1991. Maurice Armster, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk 9/18/90 ORIGINAL STATE -LOCAL ENTITY MASTER AGREEMENT NO. SLTPP-5075 STATE -LOCAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM (Pursuant to S&H Code Section 2600 et seq) LOCAL ENTITY THIS AGREEMENT, made in duplicate' this-; day of 199 , by and between City of San Jacinto a City, County, or LOCAL ENTITY, as defined in Streets and Highways Code Section 2601(a), hereinafter referred to as "LOCAL ENTITY", and the State of California, acting by and through the Department of Transportation, herein referred to as "STATE". WITNESSTH WHEREAS, as provided by Section 2600 et seq. of the Streets and Highways Code, LOCAL ENTITY, has applied for State Share funds to be used for an "Eligible Project" as defined, herein referred to as "PROJECT" selected by LOCAL ENTITY. WHEREAS, STATE is required to enter into an agreement with LOCAL ENTITY to delineate certain responsibilities relative to prosecution of the said PROJECT. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE I - Contract Administration 1. Projects shall be constructed in accordance with this agreement and as described in the Project Termini and Type of Work of the Program Supplemental Agreement. 2. Unless otherwise provided in the Program Supplement the LOCAL ENTITY shall advertise, award and administer the construction contract for the PROJECT. 3. The construction work for PROJECT shall be performed by contract. As a condition of acceptance of the State Share Funds provided for this PROJECT, LOCAL ENTITY will abide by the State/Local Partnership Program policies, procedures, guidelines and any special covenants in the Program 1 the STATE, and LOCAL ENTITY. 8. The Legislature of the State of California and the Governor of the State of California, each within their respective jurisdictions, have prescribed certain employment practices with respect to contract and other work financed with State funds. LOCAL ENTITY shall ensure that work performed under this agreement is done in conformance with the rules and regulations embodying such requirements where they are applicable. 9. After completion of all work under this agreement and after all costs are known, LOCAL ENTITY shall contract for a financial audit of the project costs. The Final Audit, to be accomplished at the LOCAL ENTITY'S expense, may be done on an individual project basis, or may be included in the LOCAL ENTITY'S annual Single Audit. If an individual project audit is done, the auditor must prepare a Final Audit Report. If the LOCAL ENTITY chooses the Single Audit option, a Management Letter will be required for the State Share funding. In either case, the audit will include compliance tests required by the Single Audit Act and its implementing directive, OMB Circular A-128. The compliance testing should ensure controls are in place to assure that: (a) Reimbursement claims submitted to the State for the project are supported by payment vouchers and canceled checks. (b) Charges for the various categories of eligible costs incurred by the LOCAL ENTITY are fully supported. (c) Ineligible costs were not claimed as reimbursable on the project. (d) Construction Engineering and contingencies do not exceed 10% of contract items. (e) Local match funds were from an approved source. 10. The Final project Expenditure Report must be completed within 120 days of project completion and should be in the format described in Volume I, Section 19, Exhibit 19-la of the Local Programs Manual. The Final Audit must be completed by December 30th following the fiscal year of project completion. Project completion is defined as when all work identified in the approved State/Local Partnership Application and Program Supplement Agreement has been completed and final costs are known. The report documents (Final Project Expenditure Report and Final Audit Report) will be sent to the appropriate State Department of improvements on the right of way. (e) the cost of all utility relocation, protection or removal legally obligated to be done by the LOCAL ENTITY. (f) the cost of all hazardous materials and waste clean up not reimbursable by prior owners. (g) the costs which arise out of delays to the contractor because utility facilities have not been removed or relocated, or because rights -of -way have not been made available to the contractor for the orderly prosecution of the work. 3. Should LOCAL ENTITY, in acquiring right-of-way for PROJECT, displace an individual, family, business, farm operation, or nonprofit organization, the LOCAL ENTITY shall provide relocation payments and services as required by California Government Code, Sections 7260-7277. ARTICLE III - Engineering 1. "Preliminary Engineering" costs may not be financed with State Share funds and shall be financed by the LOCAL ENTITY with other sources of funding available to the LOCAL ENTITY. 2. "Construction Engineering" as used herein includes actual inspection and supervision of construction work, construction staking, laboratory and field testing, preparation and processing of field reports and records, estimates, final reports, and allowable expenses of employees engaged in such activities and may be financed with State Share funds. Established overhead for employees working directly on an approved 1ROJECT is eligible for cost sharing. The LOCAL ENTITY shall contribute its general administrative and overhead expense and not bill that.cost as part of local contributions. 3. Unless the parties shall otherwise agree in writing, LOCAL ENTITY'S employees or engineering consultant shall be responsible for all engineering work. When construction engineering is performed by STATE, charges therefore shall include an assessment on direct labor costs in accordance with Section 8755.1 of the State Administrative Manual. The portion of such charges not financed at State cost shall be paid from funds of LOCAL ENTITY. 5 Use and Occupancy Agreement, setting forth the terms under which the utility facility is to cross or otherwise occupy the right-of-way is executed by the LOCAL ENTITY and OWNER. The Use and Occupancy Agreement setting forth the terms under which the utility facility is to cross or otherwise occupy the right-of-way must include the provisions set forth in Volume I, Section 12 of the LOCAL PROGRAMS MANUAL published by the STATE, unless otherwise approved by the STATE. 2. If any protection, relocation or removal of utilities is required within STATE's right-of-way, such work shall be performed in accordance with STATE policy and procedure. LOCAL ENTITY shall require any utility company performing relocation work in the STATE'S right-of-way to obtain a State Encroachment Permit prior to the performance of said relocation work. Any relocated utilities shall be correctly located and identified on the as -built plans. ARTICLE VI - Condition of Acceptance As a condition of acceptance of the State Share Funds provided for this project, LOCAL ENTITY will abide by the State policies, procedures and guidelines pertaining to the State/Local Partnership Program. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement by their duly authorized officers. STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL ENTITY Department of Transportation By By District Director of Transportation Date Date 7 PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 001 to STATE -LOCAL TRANSPORTATION Date: August 13, Location: Project Number: E.A. Number: PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM AGREEMENT NO. SLTPP-5075 1991 08-RIV-0-SJC SB91-5075(265) 08-955338 This Program Supplement is hereby incorporated into the State -Local Trans- portation Partnership Program Agreement for State Share Funds which was entered into between the Local Entity and the State on / / and is subject to all the terms and conditions thereof. This Program Supplement is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 3 of Article I of the aforemen- tioned Master Agreement under authority of Resolution No. approved by the Local Entity on (See copy attached). The Local Entity further stipulates that as a condition to payment of funds obligated to this project, it accepts and will comply with any covenants or remarks setforth on the following pages. PROJECT TERMINI: ESPLANADE AVE-SR 79/STATE TYPE OF WORK: WIDEN STREET LENGTH: 0.0 (MILES) PROJECT CLASSIFICATION OR PHASE(S) OF WORK [X] Construction/Construction Engineering/Contingencies Estimated Cost State Share Funds Matching Funds 868,406 FY91 $ FY92 $ FY93 $ 0 138,614 0 Local $ 729,792 OTHER 0 OTHER 0 CITY OF SAN JACINTO By Date Attest Title STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Transportation By DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 08 Date 1 hereby Certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are Accounting Officer/2/4��'�%E%/ I� Chapter' Statutes Item 1 a available for this encumbrance: Date Program $ 138614.00 BCI Fund Source I AMOUNT 467 1990 2660-101-042 90-91 20.25.010.100 C 258010 042-T 138614.00 08-RIV-0-SJC DATE: 08/13/91 SB91-5075(265) PAGE: 2 SPECIAL COVENANTS OR REMARKS 1. It is mutually understood between the parties that this contract may have been written before ascertaining the availability of legislative appropriation of funds, for the mutual benefit of both parties, in order to avoid program and fiscal delays that would occur if the agreement were executed after that determination was made. The total amount of State -Local Transportation Partnership funds payable by the State shall not exceed $138614 to be encumbered and reimbursed as follows: FY 90-91 FY 91-92 FY 92-93 0 138614 0 This agreement is valid and enforceable only if sufficient funds are made available by the California State Legislature. Any subsequent State Partnership funding changes will be made through a revised finance letter. Mayor Boykin and Membe Brian K. McNabb, Directo SUBJECT: . Changes to the Northwes s of the ty Council of Community Development area Coiiceptual Specific Plan This item last appeared before the City Council on September 3rd after being continued from August 6th. Subsequently, Planning Staff has addressed the following concerns brought to the attention of the City Council: The commercial land :Ise designation; for Mr. Gruda's property at the southwest corner of Ramona Expressway and Lyon Avenue (existing Potter Road) was expanded to be consistent with the boundaries of his parcel, thereby eliminating two different land use designations on the property; (2) The Circulation Element text was revised to reflect internal consistency with the circulation plan; (3) Planning staff has revisited the environmental documentation for this project at the request of, the:City°Attorney. As a result, a revised Negative Declaration with mitigating measures has been generated, which is more consistent with previous City actions on development proposals. This revised Negative Declaration contains school mitigation consisting of 20 additional acres for elementary schools. The total acreage for all schools is now 170 acres (Please refer to revised Figure 3 for the Northwest Area Improvement Plan which can be found on page 22). The revised Negative Declaration will now contain mitigation measures which can be monitored pursuant to AB 3180. The revised Negative Declaration has been attached to this memo. Also, the Land Use plan was revised to reflect these additional school sites pursuant to the School District's request. (4) Also, staff would like to bring to the attention of the City Council certain proposed modifications and deletions of property to the plan. These changes include the following: (a) A request from seven property owners within the Northwest Area Improvement Plan to have approximately 315 acres excluded from the Northwest Area Improvement Plan. The underlying reason for this request is that the owners do not wish (b) to be included - in any future assessment _ district designed to r� finance infrastructure improvements required by the Plan. These property owners would not be compelled to finance any improvements for: their properties through participation in a Community Facilities District, ;' should the necessary improvements be adequate and available. Also, the deletion of these properties from the Plan would create a non -uniform boundary and lead to subsequent confusion. Finally, should any of these property owners discover, at a later date, that the available infrastructure is inadequate, then the Plan would have to be amended to reflect any boundary changes. If the above stated reason is the property owner's sole basis for requesting the exclusion, it appears to be based on misinformation.Staff does not support the deletion of these properties from the Northwest Area Improvement Plan. An August 22nd request from Mr: Manfred Hall to have 6.51 acres located at the northwest corner of Community College Drive and State Street reclassified from "Medium and High Density Residential" to "Community Commercial" per the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Mr. Hall wishes to take advantage of the commercial opportunities afforded by the proximity to Mt. San Jacinto College and the commercial property located to the south. Staff is generally supportive of the request and feels that this change could stimulate more unified commercial development in the near term. Also, this request complements the existing Circulation Element inasmuch that State Street is a Secondary Highway (88' ROW), and customarily residential properties should not have frontage on a roadway with substantially higher traffic levels than customary for residential neighborhoods. Staff would like to make the following four-part recommendation to the City Council for their consideration: (1) ADOPT the Negative Declaration with mitigating measures for the Northwest Area Conceptual Specific Plan; (2) - DENY the request to delete the 315 acres from the Northwest Area Conceptual Specific Plan since it would result in a non -uniform and illogical boundary, and since owners will not be required to finance improvements that may already be available; (3) APPROVE the modification request to allow a ;"Community +Cpmmer Land Use designation at the northwest corner of Community College D and State Street since such a modification facilitates expanded commera opportunities; and (4) ADOPT a resolution approving an amendment to the Land Use, Circulation, Hazards Management, and Aesthetic, Cultural, and Recreational Resources Elements of the General Plan and adopt the Northwest Area Conceptual - - Specific Plan, as amended. Respectfully, B}2 N MC NABBBB' IX Director of Community Development ATTACHMENTS 1. Minutes from 8-6-91 City Council Meeting 2. Revised and Use Plan 3. Revised Circulation Plan and text changes 4. Letter requesting deletion from Northwest Area Improvement Plan (dated 9-25-91) 5. Letter from Manfred Hall (dated 8-22-91) 6. Negative Declaration and Initial Study for Northwest Area Improvement Plan AUGUST Q i99' ITY4UNC11 A ,MOTION _ was °,:<made : by Councilmember;.: Ford, secondedy Councilmeniber Leahy to 'continue"'this mnattertc`_the'heat ing of September ,3, ;1991, and'Instruct staff to:come back with additional•facts, work'4with the CounaiV,PubliOtWorks Subcommittee the i,4ssoaiation }.and ;property;::. Ownersh:on Via` recommendation:;. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Councilmember Hafliger absent. City Attorney Coxwill mediate the fence '',issue .:.with � Phillips and ,;the .`' association -;'and try to facilitate 'transfer private f easement. .2 Annexation #68 - LAFCO�#90-87-3'_(Continued from 7/16/91) `y Located east of Hewitt Street, south of Washington Avenue, west of Windham Street and north of Park Avenue. Community Development staff report. Mayor;, Boykin opened the public hearing. ' There being no speakers wishing to present ;testimony, Mayor Boykin closed the public hearing. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by. Councilmember Ford to adopt Resolution No. 1986 approving Annexation #68. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Councilmember Hafliger absent. RESOLUTION NO. 1986 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO (ANNEXATION NO. 68) 3.3 Northwest Improvement Area (Continued from 7/16/91) RECOMMENDATION: Accept testimony on Northwest Improvement Area and adopt Resolution No. approving amendment of the Land Use Element, Circulation Element, Aesthetic, Cultural, Recreational Resources Element, and Hazards Element of the General Plan and adopt by reference the Northwest Improvement Project. Community Development Director McNabb advised it is staff recommendation to take testimony and continue this matter .. to the meeting of September 3, 1991. Additionally, staff requested a correction to the circulation element on page 10. And finally, the designation and existing zoning on Mr. Gruda's property is in conflict, and an adjustment would have to be made for that if Council so desires. Further, staff has re- viewed the storm drain facilities on the master plan and the development plans for -the 11 tract .and ; does not find h'them `to_ Emphasized dthese are only conceptua Mayor Boykin continue public hearing. Donald Holmes, 142 South Sheriff,_` and owner ofproperty on Cottonwood. Referringto flood control 'documents, still :feels ;there are inconsistencies. Properties in the <: _• _, area are inundated -every. time it' rains. Voiced;; concerns that the City :_ands County have ; moved the water flows. 4= ' Stated provisions need: to be made to place water on the west side of the San Jacinto Reservoir. Voiced concerns regarding the three Metropolitan Water District? (MWD) aqueducts in ; the area which flow ::.under proposed flood control. path.'" Voiced concern that water has not yet been consulted on"this `=matter.>wF Mayor Boykin read ;;the letter faxed from MWD which isentered into the agenda packet. Mr. McNabb reviewed the, concept at this time = and identified the various aspects.One concern is the City's desire not to incur the cost to relocate major facilities. Many concerns will be addressed when an, actual construction project exists. Drainage must be designed to avoid major problems. In response to Councilmember Richards, Mr. Holmes advised that for years,, agencies.; have been dumping water on the_, homes in that area. . FWD bought the reservoir and removed soil to build a dike, leaving a trench which displaced water back to Lyon and along property frontage. Feels this needs to be rerouted. Dave Cottington, 1655 East Sixth, Corona, requested approval, stating the drainage problems are an engineering matter which can be addressed at the design stage. He was further surprised by the recommendation to continue this matter, especially with the testimony of the past 5-6 months. He is the property owner and would like to develop. Ken Smith, 38150 Cottonwood, understands the Northwest Improvement Area project is conceptual. However, inquired if there has been an environmental study as part of this, as required by CEQA. Staff advised there was. However it is not a part of the NBS Lowry documents. City Manager Easter advised that if there are those interested in reviewing the environmental documents, they are available at City Hall. 12 Mr Smithalso has some drainage?, concerns ands inquiries regarding k thesewerage ;system ;`studies availability to Tract6425, -Mr.: McNabb advised the j does not get that specific.; Advised`: Mr. Smiih bese engineering ssues nd policy.u ' isses. If..'a tract map be , =engineered to Sow -into ;that particular,' linens meets the'policy of•the district and thereis capac then' there would'be no;problem. Dr. '' Bill: Marshall, m` representing :,the : <school'.; inquired vironmental -_ assessment checklist - annot a =.full= EIR. Mr. McNabb; advised it is notan EIR. Dr. Marshall presentedaletter which will be entered as part -of the agenda packet. Stated this, was an amendmenttothe General Plan when done and questioned it being done without ,an EIR. Further, feels -,-this is subject to the Murrietta and Hart Case, requested an EIR because this obviously impacts the schools and-itshould; all be put into a mitigation plan pursuant to;-AB318O. Dr. Narshall, in response to Councilmember Richards, stated that school placement is only for the purpose of determining acreage for the land use element and -there is no actual approved site. Further, tentative locations were not determined by the school district. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember Richards to reconsider the zoning lines regarding the Gruda property for the purpose of retaining the present, zoning on,the entireacreage, rather than excluding part of it. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Councilmember Hafliger absent. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Mayor Boykin to continue this hearing to September 3, 1991. Councilmember Richards requested an explanation as to why it was necessary to continue this matter. Community Development Director McNabb advised that the land use element of the General Plan amendment needs a change in that a paragraph relating to the school formula for the plan, making it applicable citywide was inadvertently left out. Also the acreage calculations for schools and the acreage of school sites on the map do not match. If Council prefers it could be approved now and amended at a later date. 13 Councilmember Leahy expressed interest in withdrawing her motion, in view of the fact it is possible to -make changes in the future if approved tonightand instruct staff .to •make changes and come back with an ,amendme Mayor Boykin declined withdrawal. Motion'' -failed" -on 1-1 vote with Councilmember Richards dissenting. an Councilmember Leahy abstaining, with 'Councilmember Hafliger absent. City Attorney Cox advised he would like to review the CEQA status of this prior to any action by the Council. A MOTION was made by Mayor Boykin, seconded by Council - member Ford to continue this hearing to September 3, 1991. Motion carried on a 3-1 vote with Councilmember Richards dissenting and Councilmember Hafliger absent. 3.4 Street Lighting & Landscape Maintenance Rates Les Evans presented a corrected Exhibit A which will be made a part of the agenda packet. Staff advised the'ex- hibit was basically the same, just one of the sample sce- narios had been included and was unnecessary. The major- ity of the areas have the same tax rate with a few excep- tions. Mr. Evans explained each one in detail. Some cal- culation errors from a previous year have been corrected. Staff clarified for Council that the landscape maintenance for Soboba is open space, and not association common area. There being no speakers wishing to present testimony, Mayor Boykin closed the public hearing. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Ford, seconded by Councilmember Leahy to adopt Resolution No. 1987 approving rates for street lighting and landscape maintenance. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Councilmember Hafliger absent. RESOLUTION NO. 1987 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE REPORT OP THE CITY MANAGER, DATED JULY 10, 1991, PREPARED PURSUANT TO RESO- LUTION NO. 1961 AND APPROVED PURSUANT TO RESOLUTION NO. 1961A OF'SAID COUNCIL, AND THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ESTIMATE, DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT CONTAINED IN SAID REPORT, ORDERING CERTAIN STREET LIGHTING FIXTURES AND APPURTENANCES TO BE MAINTAINED AND ELECTRICAL CURRENT TO BE FURNISHED'FOR: LIGHTING SAID FIXTURES AND TO ORDER CERTAIN LANDSCAPING TO BE MAINTAINED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING:JULY-1.9914 14 11 CITY OF SAN JACINTO LAND USE ELEMENT OWRY 1546 WEST FLORIDA AVENUE HEMET, CA 92343 1714) 666-7116 LEGEND SYMBOL LAND USE DESIGNATION LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES INDUSTRIAL PARKS WATER RErc_tgfxrioN mc:a Yr LAND USE ELEMENT NORTHWEST IMPROVE YICIM1Y MA► The Feasibility Study will examine the;`; existing land -uses, current General Plan Land -Use Element and will provide recommendations for amendments to the. Land -Use Element.of -the General Plan. he Feasibility Study examined the following issues as they relate to the'`future land -use designations in the study area: Existing land -uses and zoning Proposed development projects General Plan Land -Use designations Environmental and developmental constraints Proposed circulation system Provision of balanced community The existing land -uses in the study area consist of agricultural, vacant, residential, and commercial. The agricultural uses consist primarily of dairy farms, calf nursery, and field crops. The residential uses consist of single family tracts currently under construction, existing single family tracts, and scattered low density residential units. The existing commercial uses consist of the Open Air Market/Auction, and scattered commercial uses along the Ramona Expressway. The existing zoning in the area consists of primarily A - Agricul- ture, R-A - Residential -Agriculture, R-1 Single Family, R-2 - Two Family, C-1 - Neighborhood Commercial, C-2 - Community Commercial, M-1 - Light Industrial, and W-2 - Controlled Development Area. There are currently 12 residential tract maps creating 2,976 lots under consideration in the study area. Several of the tracts are recorded and the homes are under construction while the remaining tracts are either tentatively approved or currently being consid- ered by the City. There is one industrial/commercial tract map creating 21 commercial lots and 66 industrial lots. This map is approved and is under design. The existing General Plan Land -Use Element designates the majority of the study area as Low Density Residential and Rural Residential/Agriculture. The remainder of the study area is designated as Medium Density and High Density Residential and Community Commercial, these designations represent approximately 1/4 of the study area. - 8 - The project area has several identified environmental cons which will effect the developinent potential of the area constraints include: seismic zones as identified by the Alquis Study Zone flooding and need for major flood control improvemen The project area has several other constraints associ development of the study area including: existing Metropolitan Water District Aqueduct p pipelines San Jacinto Reservoir existing diagonal streets The existing Circulation Element is proposed; to beamended with ..the implementation of the Northwest Improvement Project: 'The existing street network and land -uses., were examined'_and major changes' -are proposed. The area is characterized as an area lacking in north south circulation and poorly designed, possibly dangerous, intersections due to the diagonal streets. The changes to the Circulation Element include the realignment of Lyon Avenue, Potter Road, De Anza Drive, Ramona Boulevard,and the addition of Jeffrey Avenue, Potter Road west of the.San-=Jacinto Reservoir from Jeffrey Avenue to realigned Lyon Avenue north of the Ramona Expressway. The Circulation Element also provides bikeways;: adjacent to streets, existing aqueducts and incorporated into_the design of the flood control channel improvements. The bikeways are designed to link Mt. San Jacinto College, Valley Wide Regional Park, proposed parks and schools to existing and proposed residen- tial areas. d with t The proposed land -use plan is intended to provide for the develop- ment of a balanced community by allowing for a variety of residen- tial densities ranging from detached single family to attached multi -family. The plan also provides for commercial and industrial uses, schools, parks, and other public facilities. The land -use plan, while providing for a variety of land -uses, also recognizes existing land -uses and previously approved development plans. - 9 - e 'land -use °;,plan :allows for the pes, acreage, and percentages of LowVDe.nsity Residential Mcdium Density Residential High Density Residential Industrial Commercial Public Facilities San Jacinto River Dike Schools Parks. ,development o land uses: 47 1574 acres 270,:acres 82,`acres 2% 383 acres 11% 267 acres 8%. 222`�acres6%_. 166=acres 5% ;150;''acres 4% 233'acres 7 3337 acres - 100% 8%=; Studies-havebeen made nationwide,to:;provide:information on which to base"recommendations for types.�and percentages of land -uses to insure ,-that;,the>community will be.balanced�<and provide for needed public facilities. The studies; have been>>conducted by the American Planning: Association -and published by>'the.Urban Land Institute. :The recommended land -use percentages are as follows: Residential Commercial Industrial Public Use 46-50% 7-9% 12% 31% (includes streets, parks, schools, etc.) The proposed land -use plan is basically consistent with the recommendations of the land -use studies, although the residential percentage is higher than recommended. The public facility percentage is lower than recommended but this plan does not include streets within the public facility category. Streets are included in adjacent land -uses. The proposed park sites have been located based upon the following criteria: close proximity to residential units; adjacent to proposed bikeways or existing aqueducts;, adjacent to or in close proximity to proposed schools; accessibility; and utilization of fault hazard zones - 10 - 'The study area was -.divided into 8 Planning Areas Which are general- ly defined by imajor roadways. Each Planning Area was reviewed to estimate,population Jgenerated park acreage required. The poptila- tion generation figures were based upon 2.8 persons per,,residential' unit.Park acreage requirements were based upon the ,,City ,of 4-San, -Jacinto standard of 5 acres of park per 1,000 persons (see , Figure 1) • As indicated in Figure 2, the following park acreage requirements were calculated for each Planning Area. • Acres Planning Area Acres Required Provided 40 11 19 16 IV ii 39 V 13 VI 11 VII 3 VIII 17 65 —21 10 71 10 18 7 21 All of the Planning Areas must meet the requirements for park acreage. As property is developed each project will be reviewed to determine compliance with the park acreage requirements. The school district needs have been evaluated as part of this study and proposed school sites have been indicated on the land -use map. The San Jacinto Unified School District provided student generation figures, school capacity, and acreage requirements (see Figure 3). Based upon the criteria furnished by the school district, it was determined that 7.8 elementary schools, 1.8 middle schools, and 1.1 high schools will be required. This land -use plan provides for 5 elementary schools, 2 middle schools, and 1 high school. The school sites have been located based upon criteria outlined in the California State Department of Education publication, School Site Selection and Approval Guide (see Figure 4), and district input. The district expressed the following concerns for site selection: proximity to existing schools proximity to proposed or existing residential units proximity to major roadways proximity to known geologic hazards or pipelines School sites indicate eneral intended to be specific :locations and subplanning areaslas ate eve - 12 - The. 'easibility4Bbu current General '` ] recommendationsfor General Plan. rail evaluate the existing roadway system, n�Circulation >=Element, and ;.will provide. mendinents to the Circulation Element of the The Feasibility Study;°examined the following issues as they relate tothefuture circulation needs of the study area: - Existing iand-uses and zoning,:; Proposed developinent projects ,3)-> General, Plan; land:. use designations 4) Environmental;, anddevelopmental constraints The? existing_-land-uses.in the study;area.are primarily agriculture, vacant, residential, and limited commercial. The existing -zoning primarily reflects;tiefexisting land -uses or approved development projects whichare currently under construction or in final engineering_ "? There are currently 12;residential tract maps creating 2,976 lots under consideration in the study area. Several of the tracts are recorded and the homes are under construction while the remaining tracts are either tentatively approved or currently being consid- ered by the City,; There is one industrial/commercial tract map creating 21 commercial lots and 66 industrial lots. This map is approved and is under design. These tract maps propose to extend, realignnor create new streets within the study area. These roadways have been analyzed as part of the Feasibility Study to insure the efficient movement of traffic while protecting existing and proposed residential neighborhoods, provide safe intersections, and provide opportuni- ties for bike lanes. The existing General Plan Land -Use Element designates the majority of the study area as Low Density Residential and Rural Residential/Agriculture. The remainder of the study area is designated as Medium Density and High Density Residential and Community Commercial, these designations represent approximately 1/4 of the study area. The existing Circulation Element of the General Plan indicates Sanderson Avenue and State Street as the major north -south streets; Cottonwood Avenue as the major East-West Street, and Ramona Expressway, Ramona Boulevard and River Road as major northwest to southeast streets. The project area is lacking in East-West and other North -South street connections. - 13 - 6 <€ The :project area has severalx dentified environmenta which will effect thedevelopment potentialofthe, primariiy,==identified constraints incude,y seismic zones Study Zone flooding and nee The, project area has several other, constraints assoclat development of .'' the study area inciuding:A existing Metropolitan1-Water District.Aqueduc San Jacinto_ReservoirN existing diagonal streetsr.} "_ In determining: future street{ ocat utilized for intersection -spacin Sanderson. Avenue Minimum Ramona Expressway -1/2<-mile Based upon the information ..examined as it relates to future circulation needs of the study area, the following •; amendments are proposed to the Cxrculation Element of the Genera]. Plan: Kirby Street - Avenue eliminate Kirby Street north.; Jeffrey Avenue'- extend. Jeffrey Avenue east of Sanderson Avenue to De Anza Drive as modified 66' R-O-W, eliminate Scott Road Lyon Avenue/Potter. Road - realign Lyon Avenue, extend north/northwesterlyto Sanderson Avenue, rename Potter Road to Lyon Avenue. . Lyon Avenue to be 134' R-O-W between De Anza Drive and Ramona Expressway De Anza Drive - realign De Anza Drive to intersect Lyon Avenue at a 90 degree intersection, upgrade designation to Secondary Highway 88' right-of-way • Ramona Boulevard - realign Ramona Boulevard to intersect Sanderson Avenue at -a 90 degree intersection halfway between Ramona Expressway and Sanderson Avenue/Warren Road realigned. °Ramona Boulevard to be 134' R-O-W between Lyon Avenueand Sanderson Avenue - 14 - Jacinto0=Reservoir addition aoi ght rof-way ,,.:from . Jeffrey Avenue -addition ofvSecondary $Highwa' amona Boulevard. Drive north tc addition of Chase Street as collector rom De Anza Drive northeasterly to Ramona d tion of Chase Street as ° collector :,66' °rom mona Expressway northwesterly `overpass- ahe'.intersection -of Sanderson- Avenue and .Ramona :Expressway Provide for rightmturn;only ;to and from a point approxi- mately halfway between Sanderson Avenue and Potter Road (realigned) onto Ramona Expressway. Additionally, the Feasibility Study also provides for bikeways. The majority of the bikeways will be incorporated into the design_ of the flood control channel improvements, or adjacent to the existing aqueducts. The remaining bikeways will be adjacent to streets. The bikeways within the project area are designed to connect Mt. San Jacinto College, Valley Wide Regional Park and local parks where possible,; tothe proposed park/retention basin in Annexation No. 66. .. The proposed Circulation Element has been reviewed by the City of San Jacinto Traffic Engineer. The following modifications have been incorporated into the circulation plan pursuant to the Traffic Engineer's comments (see Figure 5): • Palm Avenue/Young Street has been designated as Secondary Highway 88' right-of-way from Cottonwood Avenue to Ramona Boulevard. Palm Avenue/Young Street will remain 66' right-of-way from Ramona Boulevard to Ramona Expressway, due to existing development constraints. Chase Street will remain Collector 66' right-of-way, due to existing development constraints. A modified section will be required at intersections to accommodate a left turn pockets and/or right turn lane. Jeffrey Avenue will remain a 66' right-of-way due to existing tract approvals setting right-of-way widths. Therefore, a modified section will be required. This section will provide 52' of paving in the 66° right-of- way (see (see Street Sections). - 15 - - 16 - Design`nCr rades K 5: 50,student's Grades 6-8 E 21'students; Grades 9'-12 2'students Students, Generated„ SchoolaCapacityLimits K 5'Elementary School 6 8Middle:=School 9-12 HighSchool -_ Recommended School Site Requirements (Net Usable Acres K-5•Elementary School 6-8 Middle School 9-12 High, School K 5 Elementary;:School: 6-8 Middle School: 9-12 High School: School Acreage Required K-5 Elementary School: 6-8 Middle School: 9-12 High School: School Acreacte Proposed K-5 Elementary School 6-8 Middle School 9-12 High School 666students 1, 000 ystudents 2,100 .;'students l0 acres/school 20 acres/school': 45.acres/school. 5.670 °:students 666 students/school = 8.5 schools 2,381 students 1,000 students/school = 2.2 schools 2.495 students 2,100 students/school = 1.2 schools 8.5 sch x 10 ac/sch = 85 acres 2.2 sch x 20 ac/sch = 44 acres 1.2 sch x 45 ac/sch = 54 acres Total acres = 183 96 acres 50 acres 24 acres 170 acres 670 students..'; 381.:students ,495=students-.- 10 acres/school. 20 acres/school 45 acres/school 5,670 students` 800 students/school = 7.1 schools 2,381 students 1,200 students/school = 2.0 schools 2,495 students 2,520 students/school = 1.0 schools 7.1 sch x 10 ac/sch = 71 acres 2.0 sch x 20 ac/sch = 40 acres 1.0 sch x 45 ac/sch = 45 acres Total acres = 156 - 22 - Mr.'Brian 'McNabb '• Director...ofCommunrty D City of San;Jacinto 201 ; East Main .;Street San Jacinto,- ,92583 Re; Exemption ;from the c Northwest :Im Resolution No. 1906 erespectfully asic to 'be released from the ;subjec 906.; Attached is a'support"statement for changes owners of property south of the San Jacinto Reservoir Very briefly, all of the infrastructure necessary to support development is in place along Cottonwood Avenue and. .. Sanderson. We have beenpayinguser fees and stand—by fees since the property was purchased. (Edison, EMWD,-MWD,;GTE, and So. Calif. Gas) We need your cooperat 'bn' and recommendation for: the City'Council.;_ Thank youfor your help-; Respectfully, :1-t e.4% ayor of S Members of cinto y Council approva 5 er,"'sewer, =-telephone, onwoodAvenue;and some o E MWD :;water, , there far n .'the' area producinga �• "-7( Gordon Hurst Jack Lieutens Lula Mae Graves 6 a) .t1 Kenneth & Marilyn Smith mb). e- :: l .7 Donald '& Gloria Holmes E o B Tony & Yvonnee Tract Map No. if applicable: TTM 26121 TTM 26246 Owner N 1--Eh Wi l Q, Rarr Donna. 5a n� s i-ior ft Ire__ nTac_ t Gilbert Chacon 9 'The attached map shows the location;of°our parcels and demonstrates that they are all located south of the San Jacinto Reservoir. Jack =Lieu `6208 :Chino.,Ave. Chino,' ;`CA 91710 'Ph..714-628-4471 Shop,. '714-464-9146 Home Lula Mae Graves'; 375 N. Kirby Ave. San Jacinto, 'CAsy92582 Ph. 714-654-7798 TTM 26246 a) Kenneth C. & Marilyn C. 1781 Cottonwood Ave. San Jacinto, CA 92582 Ph. 714-654-0262 b) Donald & Gloria Holmes 142 So. `Sheriff Ave. San Jacinto, CA 92583 Ph 714-654-9623 Smith C) El Rancho Bravo %Tony & Yvonne Dee Lyon Ave. San Jacinto, CA 92582 Ph 714-654-2925 #7 �/o rah 61� a ncrficru, }_ /gonst �3.c �jp Cv e V Y�� Fro f �r (. i e 5 A #8 #9 L o Ce .a-7 t9 t) aCa.lt,�vrsite-. E'.e ri`' San Jacinto, CA 92582 Ph. 714-654-4535 Gilbert Chacon 23513 Cawston Ave. San. Jacinto, CA 925 Ph 714-654-4535 James O'Neal 22881 Lyon Ave. San Jacinto, CA 92582 Ph. 714-654-0095 PROF" THE NORTHWEST AREA Cr 10EPTUAL SPECIFIC PLAI August 22, 1991 Manfred Hall Construction 2124 Chestnut Creek Road Diamond Bar, Calif 91765 City of San Jacinto Attn: Brian McNabb Director of Community Dev 201'East Main Street San Jacinto, Calif 92583 Re: Riverside County APN 433 - 300- 032 & 033 (6 .51 Acres Dear Members of San Jacinto City Council: I, Manfred Hall, am the ownerpof property located on the Northwest Corner of State Street (Highway 79) and Community College Drive in the City of San Jacinto. I have attached a Zoning Map and an Assessor's Par- cel Map for yourreference. I wish to request that Parcels current zoning of R-2 and R-3 be changed to C-2 in the New Ammended General Plan. The reasons for sublWit- ting this request to the City Council for a change in zoning are-twofold. The property is situated directly.across from Mt. San Jacinto College and ideal for commercial applications to serve the college and surrounding growing community. Secondly, the adjacent parcel to the South-as well as the parcels to the Southeast are zoned C-2. In addition, several years ago Parcels 2, 3 and 4 were all one parcel; I dedicated part of ,m the,land in this parcel in order that direct access on Community College Drive would be available to Heritage RV Park. Therefore I ask that Parcels 3 & 4 be designated as C-2 Zoning. Thank you for granting me the opportunity to present my request. Your time and consideration are greatly appreciated. Sincerely yours, 7-7,0i(y Manfred Hall MH:jnt Attachments RECEIVED AUG 2 2 19-1911 Community Development 117 LAND USE RECLASSIFICATION REQUEST FROM MANFRED HALL 4_2.1 r SAN JAci, OLA.EGE PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE —N • K— 3 COU N_T_R "--VILLAGE R-3 A'AtiON/4 E)e,XEssurAY • •1 fa it? 47- r 1 433-03 433-30 Sheet lotz TR-4. 0C-014 0/0-049 POP. RO. SAN JACINTO VIEJO (ELY 1/4, Sec 22, 7-4s. NOST :c4 359a ARLINGTON AVENUE FVVERS:DE, CA 92506 SxJoN REALTORS Joseph N. Tanner Commorciat/Indestliat Broker Associate Bus (714) 636-7300 (714) 6B5-5355 00771ILL MB. /38/70-75 TRACT No. /83/4 PM 134/80-82 Parcel Mop No. /8314 , ;ISSESS'S AMP3 .133 • .it'f,."Fec'ff.i.- j,.'T , J-810 a:I I.381 irf Are", .1 :100 DAVE: October 1, 1991 BY: NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROPONE Northwest Area Improvement Plan Oenerallv locate Avenue. West of Pine Avenue, and south of the Ramona Expressway. The City of San Jacinto PROJECI% LOCATION: FINDING: This project will have no significant effect on the environment as mitigation measures have been identified. MITIGATION MEAS Ensure construction of appropriate erosion control facilities * Require appropriate geotechnical review when adjacent to Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone -*Require hydrological review to ensure adequate local drainage and surface runoff * Require appropriate biology studies to determine impact on potential habitat areas of endangered species , - Ensure construction of all necessary public facilities Establishment of an assessment district to finance the construction of the necessary school facilities Ensure that adequate circulation facilities are constructed to maintain an acceptable level of service Extensions of all utilities and infrastructure required to service the development according to City standards Incorporation of air quality control measures to ensure no deterioration of ambient air quality. BRIAN MC NABB DIRECTOR OF COMMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT X X ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM BACKGROUND Name of Proponent: CITY OF SAN JAC INTO Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 201 E. MAIN STREET SAN JACINTO, CA 92583 (714) 654-7330 Date of Checklist Submittal October 2, 1991 Agency Requiring Checklist: CITY OF SAN JACINTO Name of Proposal, if applicable: NORTHWEST AREA IMPROVEMENT PLAN II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) YES MAYBE NO Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures. b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soils. c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features. d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features. e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off site. YES MAYBE NO f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake. g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality. b. The creation of objectionable odors. C. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh water. b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface runoff. C. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of flood waters. d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body. e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground water. X X X X X YES MAYBE NO g. Change in the quantity or ground waters, either through direct additions of withdrawals, or through the interception of an aquifer by cut or excavations. h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies. I. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves. 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants). b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants. c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or is a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species. d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop. 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects). b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals. c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals. X v_ x x X x x X x YES MAYBE NO d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat. 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels. b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels. 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light and glare. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource. b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource. 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions. b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emergency evacuation plan. 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area. 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing. X X X X X X YES MAYBE NO 13. Transportation / Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement. b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking. c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation system. d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people or goods. e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic. f. Increase in traffic ha7ards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection. b. Police protection. c. Schools d. Parks or other recreational facilities. e. Storm water drainage. f. Other governmental services. 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy. X X X X X X YES MAYBE NO - Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy. 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas. b. Communications systems. c. Water. d. Sewer or septic tank. e. Storm water drainage. f. Solid waste and disposal. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health (excluding mental health). b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards. 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view. 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities. 20. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site. X X X X X YES MAYBE NO b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building structure or object. C. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values. d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area. 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental goals. (A short term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definite period of time while long term impacts will endure well into the future. c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d.Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. III; - DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION _X X X X Signature IV. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Date: For the City of San Jacinto EXPLANATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR NORTHWEST AREA IMPROVEMENT PLAN The proposed project will result in some displacement and overexcavation of existing soils. Competent soil materials will be imported to the site and compacted to a 95% relative compaction. All activity will be in accordance with City standards and monitored by City personnel. All changes in topography will be done solely to facilitate on-site drainage and will be supervised by City personnel. All future development applications must be accompanied by a preliminary and final soils investigation to determine if any unique geologic or physical features are present. Should any grading operations be conducted during the "rainy" season, it is possible that surface erosion may occur. All grading plans should be accompanied by an erosion control plan. Since seismic study zones do traverse the study area, all development must be in compliance with the provisions of the Alquist-Priolo Act. Also, all future development applications must be accompanied by a preliminary and final soils investigation to determine if any active fault traces are present. The entire project must comply with the provisions of the Air Quality Management Plan for Western Riverside County. Air quality mitigation measures include, but may not be limited to the following: Alternate work schedules for commercial and industrial development, trip reduction plans, incorporation of mass transit facilities into project design, and use of alternative transit modes. Surface runoff will increase and absorption rates will decrease due to the placement of buildings on-site, compaction of soils, additional impervious surfaces, and alteration of existing drainage courses to prevent erosion. Also, the Northwest Area Improvement Plan will address the relationship of future development to proposed master planned facilities. Based on detailed hydrology studies, proposed flood control facilities must be sized and aligned to keep all properties at least 1 foot above standard flood elevation. The entire project will incorporate design standards and specifications set forth by Riverside County Flood Control for all master planned facilities. (3f/g) Since the project area is making the transition from agriculture to residential, commercial, and industrial uses, less water will be used by comparison. However, as development occurs, these areas may no longer be used for ground water recharge. (3h) The entire state is experiencing the effects of a 6 year period of drought and those municipalities which depend principally on imported supplies experience the greatest hardship. Therefore, conservation measures should be encouraged and implemented where feasible. However, the City of San Jacinto derives almost all of its water from the drafting of underground supplies. Currently groundwater sources are stable and adequate to provide potable water for domestic purposes and landscaping. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, future development must demonstrate that water conserving plumbing fixtures, landscaping, and irrigation systems are being utilized. (4a/c/d) Since this entire area is making the transition from agriculture, the elimination of crop acreage and the introduction of diverse plant species is a natural outcome. (5b) The property in question is within the historic range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant will be required to submit a biology report to determine if the property is habitat area. If the determination is made that the property is within a designated habitat area --no development will be allowed to occur. (6a&b) With the increased intensity of land use, additional noise will be created by new business activity and future homeowners, thereby creating noise which exceeds present levels. For those properties which abut arterial highways, an acoustical analysis will be required in order to demonstrate that intrusive noise sources do not exceed 65db (outdoor) or 45db (indoor). (7 ) Sources of light and glare include automobiles, glass, and ambient light emitted from the dwellings and buildings. Possible mitigation measures include using hooded lights which confine all rays to the premises, high pressure sodium street lighting, and use of landscaping to buffer light rays. (8) The purpose of this proposal is to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan in order to facilitate the transition from Rural/Residential uses to a mix of higher density residential, commercial, and industrial uses. (10a/b) All development in this area must promote the goals, policies and objectives contained in the Safety Element of the General Plan. The transition of this area from rural/residential will undoubtedly increase both the population and the carrying capacity of the area for development. (12) The proposed commercial and industrial will create additional demands for housing stock. The number of proposed residential units is considered adequate to meet this demand. (13a/c/d) Vehicular traffic will be increased and these effects will be mitigated through payment of fees and providing additional street improvements. Also, certain streets may require additional right of way to maintain traffic flows at acceptable service levels. (13b) All proposed development will be required to comply with the off- street parking standards set forth in the development code. (13f) The Northwest Area Improvement Plan will be providing a unified trail system for bicycle and pedestrian traffic. (14) The proposed 11,340 additional residential units will create an increased demand for all public services. This impact will be mitigated through the payment of fees. It is estimated that over 10,500 students will be generated by this project requiring approximately 156 acres for new school sites to adequately serve all students on a year round basis. This proposal will provide the dedication of 170 acres for the following types of schools: K-5 Elementary School = 96 acres 6-8 Middle School = 50 acres 9-12 High School = 24 acres TOTAL 170 acres (15) Development within the Northwest Area Improvement Plan will require substantially more energy at buildout when compared to the existing agricultural uses. All franchise utilities will be contacted regarding the feasibility of extending transmission facilities to serve the development. Prior to the construction of any buildings within the area, detailed energy calculations shall be approved in accordance with the provisions of Title 24. Transmission facilities for all utilities are currently unavailable to service the proposed study area. The plan will explore the feasibility of providing necessary facilities for the anticipated level of future development. All development within the Northwest Area Improvement Plan must comply with the provisions of AB 939 - Solid Waste Diversion Plan and the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Plan. Residential development will create a need for additional park land and facilities within the City of San Jacinto. This impact will be mitigated through the payment of Local Park Fees, which are payable prior to the issuance of a building permit or the actual dedication of park acreage and/or facilities may be required. An archeological and paleontological report shall be required prior to any preliminary grading in order to determine if additional mitigation measures are necessary. The biology report will identify all impacts to habitat of rare or endangered species. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, APPROVING AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT CIRCULATION ELEMENT, AESTHETIC, CULTURAL, RECREATIONAL RESOURCES ELEMENT, AND HAZARDS ELEMENT OF THE SAN JACINTO GENERAL PLAN FOR THE FIRST CYCLE OF 1991. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS; WHEREAS, Section 65631 of the Government Code provides that no mandatory element of a General Plan shall be amended more frequently than four times during any calendar year, and that the City Council of the City of San Jacinto is amending the Land Use Element of the San Jacinto General Plan for the first time during the 1991 calendar year; and WHEREAS, the Northwest Area Improvement Plan was approved by the City Council at its July 16, 1991, August 6, 1991, September 3, 1991 and October 8, 1991 meetings; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of San Jacinto held a public hearing on July 16, 1991, August 6, 1991, September 3, 1991 and October 8, 1991 and made a determination that the Circulation Element, Hazards Management Element, Aesthetic, Cultural, Recreational Resources Element, and the Land Use Element of the General Plan of the San Jacinto General Plan should be amended; and, WHEREAS, advertisement for a public hearing on the Northwest Area Improvement Plan was published in accordance with Article 6, Chapter 3, Title 7, of the Government Code; WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there will not be a significant impact upon the environment by right of this change and adopts a Negative Declaration for the Northwest area improvement plan Therefore the land use element of the General Plan is amended in accordance with Exhibit "A","B","C", and "D", and the Northwest Improvement Plan incorporated by reference. INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the said City Council of the 6th day of August, 1991. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED the 6th day of August, 1991. ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk Mayor CER'I IFICATE The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. duly passed by the said City Colin cil of the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein. Deputy City Clerk s../ 1/-1. I emtr eve • I w e— vr-si I Ve JIL.000 (714) 654-2785 EXHIBIT "A" s. AREA MAP GPA 5-90 •••••• 041, 107.30, F, WON., tOw00. IC.00, OP 11.0.0(A. DO PPP* OP slartwo, WeCeopow. OF •—• MIN 40•00. • POP. IPPol. Fvot$0.00, 0, • PM. PPM. ••• 0•TNC2111 a. iENO Schools School District Boundary Slate h1414'hrrays Rearoack: it! n•• •••• •••••••• Nj if 4 e....wwwww Lew. woopeow war. "IMMO VIcIMITY MAP scAu r. too OKAPI*. 1.111 rigi%12.11=11111.1.111011. IVA NW UM INISMOM NV,' ilk tOP-102: r 74r4 EXHIBIT "B" NB OWRY 1645 WEST FLORIDA AVENUE HEMET, CA 92343 17141 566-7116 LEGEND SYIABOL LAND USE DESIGNATION LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL PUBLIC FACIUTIES INDUSTPI AL PARKS fNQINEER ANP PLAN,NFill LAND USE ELEMENT LET OF NORTHWEST IMPROVEMENT PROJECT EXHIBIT "C" 1. Planning Area 1 (Approx. 3580 acres) This area encompasses part of the northwest portion of the study area bounded by State Street to the east, Cottonwood Avenue to the south, Sanderson Avenue to the west and the San Jacinto River to the north. This is an area of rural residential and agricultural uses that is transitioning to urban uses. The topography is relatively flat and the development potential within the area is very good. Much of the land adjacent to the Ramona Expressway is expected to generate commercial and industrial uses as well the intersections at Cottonwood and Sanderson Avenues and at the Ramona Expressway and Sanderson Avenue. Residential development is expected to dominate the area south of the Ramona Expressway. Development in the northern portion is limited by the San Jacinto River. 2. Planning Area 2 (Approx. 1224 acres) This planning area is located in the southwestern portion of the study area south of Cottonwood Avenue, west of Palm Avenue, north of Commonwealth Avenue extended, and east of Sanderson Avenue. The current area uses are predominately rural agricultural and residential with a transition into urban uses. The area is expected to develope with single family residential subdivisions with ancillary commercial uses at Sanderson and Cottonwood Avenues. 3. Planning Area 3 (Approx. 530 acres Except for a mobilehome park and some single family development in the northeastern portion, this planning area is dominated by industrial uses. It is located east of Planning Area 2, north of Commonwealth Avenue, south of Cottonwood Avenue, and west of Santa Fe Avenue. Important considerations include the interface with adjacent land uses and the location of a major regional park and recreation facility in the western portion of the area north of Esplanade Avenue. 4. Planning Area 10 (Approx. 3387 acres) This planning area is located at the far north boundary of the city's sphere of influence. It includes the San Jacinto River and the hillsides to the north, west of State Highway 79 and east to the approximate extension of San Jacinto Avenue. It is an area with major developmental constraints, including flooding, hillsides, seismic zones, limited access and lack of infrastructure. The growth potential is limited to small scale developments. Figure LU- 1 PLANNING AREAS CITY OF SAN JACINTO GENERAL PLAN ,7-7L -1 f \ MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJEC I: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development October 1, 1991 Tentative Tract 23963, Final Map APPLICANT: The Peacock Radaker Corporation LOCATION: Between Esplanade and Washington Avenues, west of Mountain Avenue and east of Hewitt Street. Staff and the City Engineer has reviewed Final Tract Map 23693 and have found it to be in substantial compliance with the Conditions of Approval, and the Subdivision Map Act. Also, since this map was prepared for finance and conveyance purposes, the issue of school fee mitigation is not applicable. All subsequent tracts subdivided for merchant land sale will be required to address school facilities mitigation. Staff recommends the Council approve Final Tract Map 23963 and authorize the Mayor to sign the map for recordation. Respectfully Submitted, _ BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM:mcc San 0 200 660' 1/4 mi. \-14../1 acinto /alley H CITY OF SAM JACINTO Tentative Tr ,ot Map No. 23963 PAINVVVOIVIV THE PEACOCK-RADAKER CORPORATION 7.3U laBVIZS" 11•4B Low. 114.1b. •41/1. Comma. C.N16....• MVP Ir=1101111 .11151,. 1710171-MN Thoomalpflos Vv. of too. I mad L. Y.6 ILI V. 611481. 511MOLCIAS 1140.1 Digtd44 nue ea, MICSAT• ARM* 111Wid=4:neviagr. ENGIFEERS-& PLANNERS 1545 W. FL OWA 1E. • P.O. BOX 851•HEMET CA 92343 T14/11414 -7 TIC 62„ TO: FROM: DATE: REGARDING: CITY OF SAN JACINTO MEMORANDUM Mayor and Members of the City Council/Industrial Development Authority ster, City Manager October 8, 1991 T.E.F.R.A. Hearing: Presiding Officer The City has been approached by a modular classroom manufacturer who is interested in expanding and relocating their operations to the City of San Jacinto. To facilitate their move, the president of the company has requested economic assistance for land acquisition and purchase of new equipment. Towards this end, the company is requesting the City's assistance in receiving Industrial Development (IDB) Bonds, in a bond amount not to exceed $3 million. The State of California's IDB Program provides manufacturers, who are expanding their company within the state, to receive tax-free bond monies. Although the City facilitates the bond issuance, the requesting company is responsible for re-payment of the bonds. There are three basic requirements for manufacturers to be considered for the State IDB Program. The first two require that the applicant must: (1) demonstrate employee growth potential (note: applicant may receive $50,000 for each additional employee projected over two years); and (2) qualify as a manufacturing operation. Both of these requirements have been addressed and satisfied by the developer. A third requirement is that the manufacturer must request a minimum of $500,000 of bond proceeds, which our manufacturer also meets. To initiate the process, the City Council (and in their role as the City's Industrial Development Authority) must complete a number of steps. The first is to hold a public hearing to gain public comment on the proposed California State-wide Communities Development Authority Composite Issue of IDB Revenue Bonds for the purpose of assisting in the financing of the proposed project in San Jacinto. This public hearing is necessary to be in conformance with Federal I.R.S. guidelines. After the public hearing is held, it is then necessary to inform the State that the hearing was held, and what adverse comments, if any, were heard from the public or City Council. Then, at the Council's October 22 meeting, the City Council would consider adopting the necessary resolutions, which would then be forwarded to the State. The initial step of the process, the public hearing is scheduled to be held on October 15 at 10:00 a.m. in City Hall (312 East Main Street) to gain public comment on the project. T.E.F.R.A. Hearing: Presiding Officer October 8, 1991 Page 2 Staff is recommending that the Council (and in their role as the Industrial Development Authority) designate the Mayor as presiding officer and to hold and conduct the required hearing on October 15, 1991. REC:01}) DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: September 6, 1991 Mayor Boykin and Members of the City Council Brian K McNabb, Director of Community Development Appeal of Amendment of Conceptual Specific Plan 2-88, Rancho San Jacinto development. Attached are the Staff Report to the Planning Commission, the Memo to the City Council, and the request for the appeal from the owner's engineer. Also attached is a copy of a petition submitted to the Planning Commission. Respectfully, 17-2-- /1/2 I I */ BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development August 16, 1991 Appeal of Amendment of Conceptual Specific Plan 2-88. Rancho San Jacinto development. On July 10, 1991 the Planning Commission heard PR Equities' proposal to amend Conceptual Specific Plan 2-88 by adding an RV parking and storage area located south of Esplanade Avenue, between Mountain Avenue, Meridian Channel, and Meridian Street. The Planning Commission denied the use for an RV parking and storage area but approved the inclusion of the land into Conceptual Specific Plan 2-88. The following is the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact for denial of the RV parking and storage area: 1. No onsite manager. 2. No provision for maintenance. 3. No provision for who is to operate the RV storage yard. 4. Number of spaces provide appears to be inadequate for the number of homes proposed for Rancho San Jacinto. 5. Parking stall dimensions seem to be undersized for most recreational vehicles. 6. An RV parking and storage area is not an appropriate use at an entry into the City. Attached for your review is Staffs report to the Planning, Commission and the letter of appeal to the City Council. Respectfully, BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development s& Pt ANN( iS E0X/1/RY PLEIVI JUL 2 5 1991 CITY Of SAN JACINTO 1545 West fInNec Avenue PO Ec , 651 Hemet. (chforn,, 97343-H14 714 658-7116 41 714 652-8804 lc, H87-041.003 July 24, 1991 City of San Jacinto Planning Department 201 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 Attention: Kenson Nishino Dear Kenson: SUBJECT: SP 2-88 AMENDMENT; PROPOSED RECREATIONAL STORAGE AREA - LETTER OF APPEAL This letter is being submitted to appeal the San Jacinto Planni n g Commission denial on July 10, 1991 of the proposed recreationa l vehicle storage area as it relates to SP 2-88 Amendment. Please find enclosed a fee of $75.00 to cover the fee for appeal . Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Bruc e Ferguson or myself at this office. Sincerely, Colleen M. Mathews Project Manager BF/CM:kb Enclosures STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Ver Plank and Members of the Planning Commission DATE: June 7, 1991 SUBJECT: Amendment to Specific Plan 2-88 Proposed Recreational Storage Area APPLICANT: PR Equities 1655 E. 6th Street, Ste. A4A Corona, CA 92806 (714)272-6660 DESCRIPTION A proposed RV parking and storage facility on approximately 1.07 acres for he Rancho San Jacinto Developments located west of Mountain Avenue north of the Meridian Flood Channel. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The runoff from the proposal will flow through the channel system within SP 2-88 and should not adversely effect the environment. The project will slightly alter traffic flows as this project will become a destination for the storage users. However, they will be insignificant. DISCUSSION The subject site is a triangular piece of property with some physical constraints on it. The Meridian Channel is adjacent to the subject site along the east property line. The rear lot has an approved use for a satellite receiving station for Jones Intercable. The front lot is not only the proposed site for the recreational vehicle storage but is also the propOSed site for a future city water well. - In mid 1990, P-R Equities had applied for Change of Zone which would have facilitated establishment of an R.V. storage business. R-V storage is only allowed in an M-1 zone with a Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission denied that request. Because of constraints to the parcel involved and because of the interest of home buyers with the Rancho San Jacinto project, P-R Equities is proposing to construct an R-V storage for Rancho San Jacinto. Attached for your use is Dave Cottington's letter of request. His letter provides a base outline of how the facility will ultimately be maintained. The staff has reviewed the actual layout and has conditioned it to meet city standards and policies. We have also attached a copy for your review and comments. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 91 - 19 recommending the City Council approve this amendment to: Specific Plan 2-88 subject to the following Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval. Brian McNabb Director of Community Development FINDING OF FACT AMENDMENT TO SP 2-88 1. The Planning Commission denied the applicant reauest to change the zone to 11-1, Light Manufacturing that would allow recreational parking on the subject site. 2. The Meridian Channel is adjacent to the subject site along the east property line. 3. The rear lot has an approved use for a satellite receiving station for Jones Intercable. 4. The front lot is also the proposed site for a future city water well. 5. Homebuyers in the Rancho San Jacinto development are interested in an RV storage facility near their homes. 6 The will be no significant impact on the environment with this proposal. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ' ,AMENDMENT TO SP 2-88 FIRE DEPARTMENT COMPLY WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST DATED APRIL 18, 1991. TRAFFIC ENGINEER 1. Curb returns shall have a 35 foot radius. 2. Provide a minimum two space backup off the public right of way at the entrance. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1. Widen existing culvert at the Meridian Channel crossing to the ultimate width of Mountain Avenue. Widen Mountain Avenue across the channel and include an 8' bikelane. 2. Construct a 8 foot sidewalk/bikelane per City standards. 3. Construct a 24 inch gutter with 6" or 8" inch curbs. Hydrology study shall determine height of the curb. 4 Reconstruct Mountain Avenue to two feet past center line. 5. Marbelite street light poles shall be required. 6. Construct curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and streets per City Public Work Standards. 7. Construct handicap ramps per State requirements. LANDSCAPING IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY 1. A landscape plans shall be submitted for approval using drought resistant plant materials and automatic, moisture sensing watering system. (Rainbird Maxi Com) 2. All plant and landscaping materials shall be maintained in good condition for a period of one year. The city shall inspect, and if approved, accept the landscaping for maintenance. 3. Street trees shall be purchased from City for planting. 4. Vining plants shall be planted along the decorative block wall every 10 feet. The vine shall be of a type that will naturally cling to the wall, and if possible be evergreen. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. All fencing shall conform to the Fencing Ordinance in effect at the time of the issuance of the building permit. 2. Decorative masonry enclosed trash area. 3. Pay all fees before construction. 4. Grading and _public improvements shall be installed in accordance with City Standards and Specifications. 5. Install paving or other materials that will prohibit the generation of air pollutants. 6. Provide a minimum of 45 feet in front of the entry gate for RV's entering the project. 7. The angle of the parking stalls shall be changed or eliminate the first two stalls along the east property line. 8. Construct a masonry wall separating the well site from the RV parking area. 9. Provide smaller trash containers throughout the project. FIRE DEPARTMEN Scut 180 WEST SIXTH STREET • SAN JACINTO. CAUFORNIA 92383 • 714- 654-2701 YES NO t/ YES FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU CHECKLIST APPLICANT: PR EQUITIE5 IL55 E. CM STIZEE_ S//7E 114/11 0,021,9.,69 917Iq MEETING DATE:aki7/8,fiT SITE PLAN# 8 -71 1) PERMITS REQUIRED BY SECTION 4.108 2) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD SHALL BE PROVIDED & MAINTAINED IN ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. SECTION 10.207. YES YES NO WIDTH SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 20 FEET. VERTICAL CLEARANCE UNOBSTRUCTED VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF NOT LESS THAN 13 FEET, 6 INCHES. SURFACE OF ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND MAINTAINED TO SUPPORT THE IMPOSED LOADS OF FIRE APPARATUS AND SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A SURFACE SO AS TO PROVIDE ALL-WEATHER DRIVING CAPABILITIES. 3) ROADS IN EXCESS OF 150 FEET IN LENGTH SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH APPROVED PROVISIONS FOR THE TURNING AROUND OF FIRE APPARATUS. YES i///' NO 4) PROVIDE PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AS DESIGNATED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND NFPA, SECTION 10.303. YES_ NO 5) PROVIDE AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. ORDINANCE #917. YES NO 6) FULL FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED & ACCEPTED BEFORE THE COMMENCEMENT OF FRAMING. 7) PROVIDE FIRE DEPARTMENT WITH A SCALE MAP OF PROJECT. (8-1/2 x 11") 8) KEY BOX - SECTION 10.209. KEY BOX SHALL BE A TYPE APPROVED BY THE FIRE CHIEF & SHALL CONTAIN KEYS, MAP TO SCALE, HAZARDOUS MATERIAL LIST. 9) FIRE FLOWS SHALL BE J;(2OC7 GALLONS PER MINUTE AT 20 PSI RESIDUAL. OPERATING PRESSURE MUST BE AVAILABLE BEFORE ANY COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL IS PLACED ON THE JOB SITE. 10) INSTALL A SUPER FIRE HYDRANT (JAMES JONES J-3765 6" X 2-20,x y" ) WITHIN 300 FEET OF ALL PARTS OF THE BUILDING AS DESIGNATED BY THE FIRE DEPT. COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT. YES YES NO YES / NO od 180 WEST SIXTH STREET • SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA 92383 • 714 - 654-2702 FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU CHECKLIST (CONT'D) 11) FIRE HYDRANT SPACING IS EVERY 3Cty" FEET AS LOCATED BY THE FIRE DEPT. 12) RELOCATE HYDRANTS TO YES NO 13) UPGRADE THE NEAREST HYDRANT TO A SUPER HYDRANT. YES NO 14) HYDRANTS TO BE PAINTED W/REFLECTIVE SCOTCHLITE S-368 * BLUE DOT ON PAVEMENT TO INDICATE FIRE HYDRANT. YES 15) A COMMERCIAL HOOD SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE KITCHEN. 16) HOUR FIRE WALLS TO BE INSTALLED, DIVIDING THE BLDG. INTO SECTIONS OF MORE THAN SQ. FEET. YES NO 17) IF A FULL MANSARD IS CONSTRUCTED, PROVIDE A LADDER TO ROOF DECK. YES NO 18) TRASH BINS MUST HAVE A DROP LID. YES (//'-NO 19) STANDPIPES ON THE ROOF ARE REQUIRED. YES NO 20) INSTALL A WALK OR DRIVE-THRU WITH LOCK BOX. YES NO /- 21) A SECOND EMERGENCY EXIT SHALL BE PROVIDED. YES NO 22) "NO PARKING" SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: YES NO 23) POST "NOT A -THROUGH STREET" SIGN AT ENTRANCES. YES NO 24) MITIGATION FOR FIRE PROTECTION IMPACT. $577.00 PER DWELLING UNIT. APT. OR RESIDENCE. NEW INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL $0.34 PER SQUARE FEET. 25) THE FIRE LANE SHALL BE SIGNED IN ACCORDANCE CITY & STATE REGULATIONS. FIRE LANES SHALL BE DESIGNATED IN FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: YES NO YES NO 26) BUILDING ADDRESSES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND SHALL BE OF CONTRAST- YES ING COLOR AND BACKGROUND. THEY SHALL BE 12" FOR COMMERCIAL AND 6" FOR SUITED IDENTIFICATION AND 6" FOR RESIDENTIAL. NO fZ -2- Salt ,a,Cint0 FIRE DEPARTMENT 71Z2=1..ist.- 180 WEST SIXTH STREET • SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA 92383 * 714 - 654-2702 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU CHECKLIST (CONT'D) 27) ILLUMINATED DIRECTORY - ALL CONDOMINIUMS, APARTMENT COMPLEXES, TOWN HOUSES AND MOBILEHOME PARKS SHALL INSTALL & MAINTAIN AT POINTS OF ENTRY ILLUMINATED DIRECTORIES. YES NO ..;rArt: FICVIEW SITE PLAN STAFF REVIEW SITE PLAN AM It NOM SINT'S 24057 27 21 23 24 TENT. -PIACI 25 22 1 T;. SC flMICLI wroo,...a.A. r OWNEWAPPLIC, ANTI PEACOCK1RAORA SWAMI LTu. 1480 EAST SSA STIVIJET N, AM COACNA. CA. OITIS -ti III ITI-40141 .1N YMCA.) ASSEESQRLEABCEL_NsL__ tin—m-fie LEGAL POR11OPA ON LOT I. NOOC $0 ON TTI LANbit bP t4rin LAND COUPAPIY, DS THE ary ON MR ..{.01410. COUNTY ON RIVERSJOE, $TASI CRP CALPOOMPA AS SHCrotti SY WAR 00 MI PI INDOIE 1 OP IMPS, MIAS TO RAO 11.. RECORDS Of SAM COURTS' ON NYEANDS ACRES; UN AC. 10,110$0: /4-1 PROPOSED, LAND USES; tzlETIAtak VACANT PROPOSED: N.Y. SECURED P•trer,m0 MCIUTY INEvATt. Port Ott ON PJACHO $AS dACEIPTO HORNIORYNIRS 000, WILE:CIES: "472P,42"0,1,- ALEC/PM SOUTHERN CAUPOOMA 104100 CO, GAS. SOUTNUM CA.UPOPNEA DAS CO. it LEPHONEJ CALIPORMA NOUN EASTERN SAVNCIPAL WATIA oletrocT It.trt CITY Of tOOT JAOIHTO MOVING.% JCPRIS OrT1PRCAN.11 LANDSCAPING; GENERALELALt $01110001 COANIVNTE 0101440LI10E44, PROPOSED, COMMUNE'S CONNEACME. PARKS: 0(0nCATIOR Of LAPIO ott PAYellUfT 6, III LIEU Pkif PROP0EED TO ICA4.I r • 1 r L0040ICAPttlattm00TI00 pLANI tO El tutulT TEO ssUMOER SEPARATE COyER WELL_SLIE: MN! ASSESSOR'S PARCEL 0110tH 1/..Nt owwerkemtp INT DRAINAGE; kill II PISOTICTED rovhi tot‘rtt Pitml OUT NOT A PART Or THIN PROJECT EXISTINO MIPEDIAPS 014APMED. PIANCrK) SAN JAIDNTO FVTIJNE N. V. PoLraNG • ••n•••,.., *LAW. , MlP•0410Si II AMENDMENTS: OAT 0. DESCRIPTION tq11.I. 0.0004:W0)40LO 4. ut44,k444.06 P00,1,0040 1.0 10014 4 La 44.014.04AT 00.744 4•4400...0T, nttt, a .00.0 1.0t) Revised Tentative Parce Map No. 26446 ffigj4Urrairr C ommco \walth AVCrUe To be abandoned and realigned per Tract 23963 R-1 Vacant R-1 Future Residential ilappkg,V0 Feic 1,xrcw. ,11"LriliatIvA•fri 47,ar,o.ri Owner/ApOicant: Peacock/Radaker Equities Ltd. 1655 East 60 Street No. A4A Corona,Ca, 91719 Land Uses: Existing; Lot 1 - TV Satellite Dishes Lot 2 - Vacant with existing irrigation well Proposed: Lot 1 - TV Satellite Dish EXISTING 40'.4V BOX CULVERr I Lot I 0.04 AC - 4101.04.41001 04' exIsrING CMLIC MOIR eXtSTING 4. WATER MAN EXISTING 4' OA a mArni Al Lot 2 - Private R.V./boat sedired parki-g facility and irtation vm.•11 Utilities: Gas; Southern California Gas Co. Electric: Southern California Edison Co, Telephone: G.T.E. California Cable TV.: Inland Valley Cablevislon Water; Eastern Municipal Water District Sewer: City of San Jacinto Total Net Acres: Lot 1 -0,04 Acres Lot 2 - 1,31 Acres Legal Description: Portion of Lot 2, Block 93 of the lands of the Hemet Land Company, in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of California, as shown by map on file In Book 1 of maps, Pages 14 and,15, Records of said Riverside County, Parks: No dedication of land or payment of in lieu fees proposed, Drainage: Site Is protected from offsite flows by the existing Meridian Channel, Zoning: Existing: Lot 1 - R-1 Lot 2 R-1 Proposed; Lot 1 - R-1 Lot 2 - R-1 Landscaping: Landscaping/irrigation plans to be submitted under separate cover. M.vdt 1991 TONTAINVVI TRAM' AM. IM4017 TENTATIVE TRACT No. 24087 R. A Ist C. • H •SAN.JACINTO. r_Yeta.m-s-rfus 'L J! IC 710 N nen al, On *An Joan nt0 tra Ilit•nne TTUCT 23 03 LOT 14 6.7 NI 0.00TO fi nnemel <mem me mmemmme mersammtnes N 011 D SIp. a,elM n.n1 ODDY, fifth 3M 0.1011. ft p001 0 TO It. 0.00 PUS 11 OWN 10.000 1*100.0. AMMO WOO TO 1101 N MU WIS ream mi 0.00,9001 na.11 3 RS 33/48-62 • h2.1 \ 'f*; Kay MAI. - or-• 4. "'NI 0.01 10.00. 06ITS 11.000.. D.. VOW nwr.1.00. AsAilsI011'• 1.4140.105 00.00.400 lot 9.1A 1311 • Q I P OW I POTOT1.11 OW001211 IT VI Ife 0 1.00DIDD; IP CI, wows AMT. 10 . 0130., IL I DU. • OM MV .1 IA. • II hi were or *snow mom temmomem. ft.mm. N moue men we commosami mmee. Aq!!!,1A(22 *Ate, eteAmi Amm ZONDriq •DI 0..0. 0,4 1.100000a, 04 LANES/Al • 011.10.0 0.0000.00 000100 DOstolY 005000n*, totatE.21132.M2PASLIS2.2.1 so LOT. 4ITTT10.00 40.1 1.1711.17a OOOOO 00.01.001 ea *non an. antonlanfiat ....000110 sa. 00. WA,... ammo** mom.. worry. olorrmr, 1.1011 WTI' OR 0.0 .0.110.0 emmememeemesesommam temmemm.mm •me.* IND 00.5110 WtAfl Ammumeme. PirMetPLAS, VA-AP4 DointeMNATION too 011.0. Owee., 0000.10.n tdOw aninInart IMStiSAL rAMCIA eap Onnang anaannIala Din 411 Ye. nan 0.410.0.9111 MAW.. IntTan infan'an WWI,' KAY. ernelt127 UOIffln TO 0000. 00 0 00*0 awes, TO fITTWtert• TRIM e TO To 0.0000 00 A n.on naen 00...1.011 WOO P. SZVAAFALAMS ommemmems Man. il. -.4**1 WV 0004.107.4. n•nnnar,.. 4X:INTIOLIOC3* OvaNatamwea .1.00001 .00.001, IA 11.10 loan. v.* 00.11 Wow. DVAW ow. to The 0100.00 aentI ina1010,4 MAP. .Y1 1,40 SILAranll Das Mi 114. 0.0 ===r TT. Om eteln - .,..4"1,47.:'-Z7..:7-..-n :2:14, -;,-..7,-.:.7,:=---,---. : - 7, --77.- .\----..,„..„. - 72. .-27--- ! I OA 0.00 0.110.4 • **ALA e•ams L :77 23 'JOT 11 TR)C7 2343 twill., 11 13.131 LOWRY 111111, III I m ((III It 11141 111/111.Iiit OUTS, mirtAtimeet..-- mmm mm” R CORPORATION E PEACOCK- April 9, 1991 TO: City Staff and Planning Department FROM: Dave Cottington - PR Equities, Ltd. RE: RANCHO SAN JACINTO - R.V. STORAGE FACILITY Due to many inquiries and requests from our home builders and their homebuyers, PR Equities, Ltd. is proposing to construct a storage facility for use by homeowners within Rancho San Jacinto only. This is not a commercial venture in any way, no advertising or signage will be used. This facility is being proposed in an effort to provide a secure area for boats, r.v's. and trailers other than in front of the homes, in driveways or on the street. The site will be secured by a decorative block wall the same as used throughout our master plan with landscaping along J.:ountain Avenue be- tween the sidewalk and the wall and other security fencing along the back property line. Within this area is a water well which supplies the landscape water for the park and green belts throughout our master planned community which will be dedicated to the City. Access will be provided to the well and the wall will provide security for the well equipment as well. The maintenance of the interior of the facility will be the respon- sibility of PR Equities. Ltd. until such time as PR Equities, Ltd. involvement in the master planned community has ended. At that time a cooperative will be formed. The future ownership and maintenance will be by the users of the facility. Details of the structure of the co-op are under consideration by PR Equities, Ltd. 1(355 L SiXil STREET, MA. C(M4 ).7CA. Cf:1fl.r01 n 1\14, f)Nr ' ( 7;1 '7 2-6t i611 f ADDRESS Ai-virv). ,x2prn-d (•6741_,-.0f add. '24 i/vA;1 NaAAA-Lee./ ff !9L/,? /76162Ar -- Mf?__ cy 02.o (,2 6 ,6/4„vleA,A0,2- 9z 4 74 . ft5 197/ ALO-Eitaf-t_ /9 6- S — ozJ oPzi , /Oyu v , MIK HILL VILLAGE Pr ION TO PLANNING COMMISSION June 20 1991 If you have been on ttle -.Plannim Commission within the past 6 year !"7'u'tnuw ., how we at Park Hill Village have objected to converting R 1 zoning to other various zonings. Again we are confronted with an attempt to make an R.V. parking lot on what is now zoned R 1 .The area in questio n is approximately between Mountain and mertdian Avenues north of the flood corlz.iol charM.. This was attempted once before under a different guise,bu t was turned down by your commission. We are again appealing to you not to place this R.V. park i n g lot in our area. At their best none of them are benefici a l or aestheic to a community of homes. They bring traffic p r o b l e m s , .polution,vandalism to the RVs as well to homes near them . The one just down the street south on Mountain Ave r had to be abandoned because of .e roblems like this. Please turn down this request. NAME ) L I i - •:".--274 7/ hid_ - R.1-7721,1 4,-77 - 72,‘ • jef- re.RNItLLL vw.ji t'r.TITIUN TU VLANN1NU UUMMISSTUN June 20 1 °91 If vou have been on the Plannin..,-, Commission within the past 6 year •yr.strt.now., how we at Park Hill Village have objected to . converting R 1 zoning to other various zonings. Again we are confronted with an attempt to make an R.V. parking lot on what is now zoned R I .The area in question is 'approximately between Mountain and Mertditn Avenues mirth of the flood con..rol This was attempted once before under a different guise,but was turned down by your commission. i We are again appealing to you not to place this R.V . parking i lot in our area. At their best none of them are beneficial ' or aestheic to a community of homes. They bring traffic problems, polutio:),vandalism to the RVs as well to homes near them. The one just down the street south on Mountain Ave. had to be abandoned because of problems like this. . Please turn down this request. NAME ADDRESS /' 9 . a e j' '3 , _ //,, (1 5 i 7 / 5) Vt .4 C.4 I: 7 7 - (/ - • s VI "i- 0 "), 1.- (il - .1 • '.- ) k 4::-..., Y . , 2 . - a ) 1/1 1 (.1-,-,1 / ., ui,,(..-1)-(4-, -,,.-, (.(.7 -.,--1 ; ? , (.) / /f-:, - t-.. Y, i,:. •,.;.....:i —, ck,....., ,,,.) k,„..., ., ,, :1 ys- 1.1- • \:). /A/A 9.f? \/ .2_ a .2 c61.21-- , 02 0 0_4 7/ ) e./ a 0 7/ ,17,Z,c6 Cil):. 722:- ,41.4.advar, rLANN1NU t.:UMMibblUN June 20 1991 If you have been on ttte . Planning Commission within the past .6 years -1/11714nOw.., how we at Park Hill Village have objected to converting R I zoning to other various zonings. Again we are confronted with an attempt to make an R.V. parking lot on what is now zoned R 1 .The area in question ' is (approximately between Mountain and MertditwAvenues.morth of the flood comaol charrel. This was attempted once before under a different guise,but was turned down by your commission. We are again appealing to you not to place this R.V. parking Ilot in our area. At their best none of them are beneficial or aestheic to a community of homes. They bring traffic problems, polution,vandalism to the Rsis as well to homes near them. The one just down the street south on Mountain Ave C had to I be abandoned because of problems like this. Please turn down this request. NAME ADDRESS r clu _ 1/671 IfitNvp L "eiCC HILL VILLAGE PETT N TO PLANNING COMMISSION June 20 1g91 If "on have been on the .Planning Commission within the past 6 y e a r s UL, haw we at Park Hill Village have objected to converting R I zoning to other various zonings. Again we are confronted with an attempt to make an R.V. parking lot on what is now zoned R 1 .The area in questi9n is approximately between Mountain and Meridibli Avenues north of the flood cor -,_Lol chadel. This was attempted once before under a different guise,but was turned down by your commission. We are again appealing to you not to place this R.V. parking lot in our area. At their best none of them are beneficial or aestheic to a community of homes. They bring traffic prob l e m s , polution,vandalism to the RVs as well to homes near them. The one just down the street south on Mountain Ave. had to be abandoned because of .problems like this. Please turn down this request. NAME ADDRESS •‘t—:, , - 3 0)? P0.57 )2? bA"-' - oc./.76"-A? • Y c••": IZ767 °1-• e)/eh MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Les Evans, Interim Public Works Director DATE: October 8, 1991 SUBJECT: Water Quality/Grand Avenue Well Filtration The City Council has expressed continuing concern over the iron and manganese concentrations in the City water supply as well as other water quality issues. Following is a brief description of recent City Water Division activities to improve water quality: 1. Prepared plans and specifications for advertisement for bids for Grand Avenue Well Filtration System - The proposed filtration will provide green sand filters for removal of iron and manganese at the well. The system is estimated to cost about $325,000 and is included in this year's budget. The Council will be asked to award a contract for the equipment at the November 5, 1991 meeting. Completion of the project should occur in early 1992. 2. Inspected the City Reservoirs Both reservoirs were inspected by divers in September and found to be in good condition. One of the reservoirs contains about 8 inches of sediment and is scheduled for cleaning (by use of an underwater vacuum) in October. 3. Increased Water Testing - Several water samples containing unknown material obtained by the residents of Villa Park were sent to the laboratory for testing. One of the samples included animal tissue (probably a mouse). It is extremely unlikely that the mouse originated in the City's water system. More likely it came from the home where the sample was taken. The other samples, although containing sediment and discoloration, conformed with safe drinking water standards. The complete report is available for review by the Council and interested citizens. Chief of Police October 2, 1991; San Jacinto Police Department 160 West 6th Street San Jacinto, CA. 92583 STAFF REPORT (COUNCIL AGENDA 10-8-88) To: From: Date: Honorable Mayor and Council Members via City Manager Subject: Truck Routes This staff report is provided to the Council in an effort to once again bring to the forefront the reason Esplanade Avenue as well as other citywide arterials, have been designated as truck routes. Approximately 5 years ago the City of San Jacinto, City of Hemet and County of Riverside held monthly meetings concerning the roadway systems within the San Jacinto Valley. It was evident the existing roadways presented an number of problems due to insufficient width, most were two lanes, deterioration, intersecting at bad angles and other reasons. At the same time it was evident the roadway classifications within each jurisdiction was a mixture which also created problems, i.e., a roadway designated "major arterial" may be downgraded when it entered another jurisdiction to secondary, thus creating a bottleneck. This was only one example and there are many more. Attempting to plan for the future each entity discussed how we could best look at the standardizing our roadway classifications where they were joined by two entities to cope with the rapid growth we began to experience 5 years ago, realizing we were 20 years behind the times both in planning and funding. This planning process went on for approximately 18 months, each agreeing to clean-up their general plan circulation elements and work towards upgrading the traffic circulation system for efficient movement of vehicular traffic within each jurisdiction. This planning effort is still going on to this date through the master planning process and through mutual cooperation with each entity. On March 5, 1991 the Council adopted Ordinance 913 designating the truck routes being considered by the city within the City of San Jacinto's jurisdiction. This was done after staff met with officials from the City of Hemet and Riverside County and agreed to roadways which aligned, and, would be able to carry truck volume. Staff Report (Council Agenda 10-8-91) .;.' Page 2 Surface Transportation Assistance Act truck routes were considered as well as routine truck routes. In dealing with the issue of Esplanade Avenue, as far back as 1984 circulation studies showed Esplanade as a "major arterial" with 100' right-of-way. As such San Jacinto chose to continue this classification since according to the County of Riverside it is their intention to continue Esplanade Avenue as a 4 lane roadway from Warren Road to San Jacinto's westerly city limits. In future planning of Annexation 66, the city also feels that should Esplanade Avenue come under total control of the city, we would maintain the "major arterial" designation from Warren Road to the Ramona Expressway, thereby creating the only east/west corridor from Warren Road to the Expressway wide enough and constructed sufficiently to maintain as a truck route. A map presentation will be made to help understand the location and how the truck route system between Hemet, the County and the City of San Jacinto tie in. 744da_X/e- c5:3 /0/5"/ San Jacinto Police Department 160 West 6th Street San Jacinto, CA. 92583 STAFF RI PORT (COUNCIL AGENDA 10-8-88) To: Honorable Mayor and Council Members via City Manager From: Date: Chief of Police October 2, 1991 Subject: Discharge of Firearms - Potato Festival As of this date I have been unable to confirm some safety concerns as well as insurance coverage. We are still working with the organizer of the firearms act and more information will be available prior to the council meeting. Sallee Pool Overall Operating Comparison Report Valley-Wide Recreation Monthly Operation Date 6/7-6/30 7/1-7/31 8/1-8/31 9/1-9/8 1991/92 Expenses $4,038.40 $5,954.32 $4,416.26 $ 641.28 $15,050.26 Revenue $2,290.50 $3,772.82 $3,031.25 $ 401.45 $9,496.02 City Subsidy $4,833.33 $4,833.33 Not Rec. $ 9,666.66 Date Expenses Revenue City Subsidy *89/90 $24,025.00 $6,030.00 $17,995.00 *90/91 $23,925.00 $7,015.00 $16,910.00 91/92 $15,050.26 $9,496.02 $ 9,666.66 *City of San Jacinto operated pool 1992 SALLEE PARK POOL SUGGESTED IMPROVEMENTS 1) Purchase of solar pool cover 2) Re -finish/repair actual pool surfacft. 3) Snack bar security improvements SIGNED Townsel, Water Superintendent ,74-/-70", —277.e22 7 CITY OF SAN JACINTO WATER DEPARTMENT 905 Industrial Way San Jacinto, CA 92383 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJ: Honorable Mayor & City Council John Townsel, Water Superintendent October 2, 1991 Approval of Extra Work Ticket I am requesting that an extra work ticket for the Downtown Water Project be approved in the amount of $32,356.79. The extra work ticket is for work done by B & Sons Construction, Inc. This work was accomplished during the month of November, 1990. The delay in asking your approval for this extra, was primarily due to the fact that B & Sons Construction has not finished their final paving on this project. However; B & Sons Construction has agreed to procede if this extra work ticket is submitted for your approval. No further payments will be made until this project is complete and all legalities have been seen to. Funding to be from Water Fund Reserve Account 50 -9000 -5400. Details of Extra Work These extras were unforeseen problems in the installation of a 12" water main in the alley south of Main St., between Sheriff St. and San Jacinto Ave. Ticket numbers included in this extra: SEE ATTACHED SHEET Numerous delays not due to B & Sons Construction included: 1. Previous unknown water main locations. 2. Previous unknown utility locations. 3. Delays with Cal-Trans Encroachment Permits. 4. Replacement of support pad on adjoining building at San Jacinto Ave. and the alley. jt/kp ITY OF SAN JACINTO :0:30X__ 448 Telephone: (805) 963.1433 (805) 648-7040 SONS CONSLZ ON, geneAaler yateexazi 527 N. RICE AVENUE OXNARD, CALIFORNIA 93030 LICENSE NO. 302418-A P.O. No. JOB g 1720 Date JUNE 21, 1991 SAN JACINTO, CA 923453 JOB LOCATION:. DOWNTOWN SAN 'JACINTO WATER LINE , = DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 1062 1,518.54 EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 1061 788.71 EXTRA WORK TICKET. NO. 1060 2,915.72 EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 1059 339.36 EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 1057 2,343.55 EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 1056 i 1,310.63 EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 1055 2,554.35 EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 1054 1,717.52 „ EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 1052 919.50 • EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 1051 371.7S NEXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 00100 EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 00099 2,325.07 EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 00097 214.12 ,EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 00096 497.94 EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 00095 193.9' EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 00093 821.94 EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 00091 1,677.00 EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 00089 505.00 EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 00085 742.9u EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 00033 2,795.50 EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 00081 703.72 EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 00080 EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 00077 . -EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 00075 EXTRA WORK TICKET NO. 00074 2,qA.04 1 i TOTAL: S 32 6 .4-9 WORK APPROVED By: CITY OF SAN JAC INTO MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council 40-1 FROM: Pam l. aster, City Manager DATE: October 8, 1991 REGARDING: Soboba Springs Villages Project I have attached the October 4 letter from Jerry Rice that addresses the various issues and goals surrounding the proposed Soboba Springs Villages project. In addition to placing this on the regular meeting agenda, this subject will also be discussed at the 7:00 p.m. Executive Session, to advise you of several recommendations that the City's bankruptcy attorney has suggested that the Council consider. These recommendations have been reviewed and concurred with by Jerry Rice. RICE DEVELOPMENT, INC. October 4, 1991 MS. PAM EASTER CITY MANAGER CITY OF SAN JACINTO P.O. Box 488 San Jacinto, CA 92583 RE: SOBOBA SPRINGS PROJECT Dear Pam: As you know, on October 24, 1991 the bankruptcy court will be confirming the reorganization plan for the Soboba Springs project. This confirmation will allow us to continue to develop the Soboba Springs project. Recently, the City of San Jac/iito has voiced concerns regarding the reorganization plan. Specifically, on September 4, 1991, the City's attorney submitted a letter to the bankruptcy court indication that the City would not oppose the reorganization plan if some issues could be resolved. We have met with the City on several occasions to discuss many of these issues. At this time, we would request that the City advise the bankruptcy court that the City of San Jacinto does not oppose the confirmation of the reorganization plan. This needs to be accomplished prior to October 17, 1991 in order that this information can be included in the October 24, 1991 Confirmation hearing. I believe your City attorney has already received the necessary paperwork for the City to approve the reorganization plan. In our meetings with the City we have discussed our objectives regarding the development of the Soboba Springs project relative to the City's concerns and development concerns. We have set forth our goals as follows: 163 E. MAIN STREET • SAN JACINT'0, CALIFORNIA 92583 • (714) 654-4454 1. Reevaluate the development agreement in terms of developer's objectives and City's interests because the existing agreement has been terminated. 2. The Bridge across the San Jacinto River. It is our goal for the bridge construction to be funded by the Redevelopment Agency, when there is adequate tax increment to allow for bridge construction. Fire Station. A permanent fire station location, facilities and staffing will be reviewed to determine potential alternative locations and methods of financing. 4. Revise the existing CFD with the goal of using only the land as security, while minimizing the amount of the CFD to the greatest degree possible. It is our goal to reduce the CFD to approximately $5 million. The current CFD is approximately $10 million with an estimated overage of approximately $3 million. The CFD bond funding for the reduced CFD ($5 million) will provide funding to construct the following: Storm Drain Facilities Water Reservoir Sewer and Water Infrastructure Interim Lift Station Other required Public Service Facilities •Park Site Once the Reorganization Plan in confirmed, we will proceed with revising engineering cost estimates for the above items and having the Soboba project reappraised and having a new market absorption study prepared. 5. Attempt to provide a minimum of five (5) acres of park and/or recreation amenities per 1,000 residents which may include innovations such as hiking trails and existing green areas. Once the bankruptcy court confirms the Reorganization Plan, the above items will be discussed in detail with the City of San Jacinto in order to come to a mutually agreeable plan for the successful completion of the Soboba Springs project. Rice Development has successful projects in the Park Hill Collection as well as Montage Development as a result of a team effort between the City and developer, quality development, award winning home designs, innovative engineering and construction, and top priority concerns for the local community. These same ingredients for success will be used to make a quality master planned community in the Soboba Springs project. Very truly yours, GERALD H. RICE PRESIDENT RICE DEVELOPMENT, INC. GHR/ajo