Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 5/7/1991
AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 625 South Pico, San Jacinto DATE: May 7, 1991 TIME: 6:30 P.M. ROLL CALL: Boykin, Ford, Hafliger, Leahy, Rose MOMENT OF SILENCE FOR REFLECTION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE I. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Labor Negotiations &Personnel Matter Motion by: Seconded by: into Executive Session for discussion of labor negotiations. Vote: Motion by: Seconded by: return to Regular Session. Vote: Action: to go Action: to II. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE'S 100TH BIRTHDAY - Robert J. Fitch III. WRCOG - VISION FOR GROWTH - A.J. Wilson IV. SPECIAL PRESENTATION - Mayor Boykin V. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion by the City Council in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests specified items to be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Mayor, state their name, address, and the Consent Calendar item number. 1 May 7, 1991 Agenda Page 2 A. Approval of Minutes of April 16, 1991. B. Approval of Warrant Nos. 24917 through 25063, as submitted by the Finance Director. C. Ordinance for Adoption - Ordinance No. 932 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, a California municipality, establishing regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreation land in subdivisions and on single parcels and the repeal of Ordinance No. 596. (Staff recommends adoption) D. Release of Grading Bonds for Tract Nos. 23789, 23790 and 23791. Applicant: Friedman Homes Location: south of Evans Street, west of Mountain Avenue, north of Esplanade Avenue and east of Hewitt Avenue. Authorization to release Grading Bonds in the amount of $277,300. (Staff recommends approval.) E. Cooperation Agreement for Pool Maintenance and Operation with Valley Wide Recreation District. (Staff recommends approval.) F. Authorization to enter into contract with Conrad & Associates for Audit Services. (Staff recommends approval.) G. Release of Performance B,:,nd Parcel` Map 223 73 Applicant: Maze Stone Ranchos, Inc. Location: Esplanade and Commerce Ln,. Authorization to release Performance Bond in the amount of $20,000. (Staff recommends approval.) H. Request for funding for the "Operation Proud Return" upcoming event on May 25, 1991. (Staff recommends approval.) I. Award of Contract for Professional Service to appraise CFD #2. (Staff recommends approval.) J. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1956 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, adopting boundary map showing territory to be annexed to an existing Community Facilities District. (Staff recommends approval.) 2 May 7, 1991 Agenda Page 3 K. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1957 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, declaring its intention to annex territory to an existing Community Faciltiies District. (Staff recommends approval.) L. Authorization to enter into agreement with Brown, Harper, Burns & Hentschke to provide legal services for Annexation No. 2 to Community Facilities District No. 3. (Staff recommends approval.) M. Time Deposit Registers for April, 1991, as submitted by the City Treasurer. Receive and file. N. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda pursuant to City Attorney. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to approve consent calendar items A through N and adopt Resolution Nos. 1956 and 1957 and adopt Ordinance No. 932 and waive the readings in full. Vote: VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Annexation No. 66 Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1937 A Resolution of the City of San Jacinto authorizing Deferred Payment of fees related to request for Annexation No. 66. (City Attorney recommends approval.) Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to adopt Resolution No. 1937 and waive the reading in full. Vote: 3 May 7, 1991 Agenda Page 4 B. Adoption of fees for processing of various development applications. (Continued from 4-2 and 4-16-91). Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to Vote: VII. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A. Request to use Hofmann Park on May 19, 1991. - Jeannette Hofmann B. Request to use Hofmann Park on June 16, 1991. Alvarina Teixeira VIII. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS A. Request for water service to property at 22741 Alessandro - Ed Meyerson IX. CITY DEPARTMENTS A. Vosburg Update - Brian McNabb B. Fire Station #1/Training Facility - Pamela Easter 4 May 7, 1991 Agenda Page 5 X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS XI. ADJOURNMENT Motion by: adjourn to May 21, 1991 at 7:30 p.m. Vote: Time: Seconded by: Action: to Next regular City Council meeting May 21, 1991. 5 ORDINANCE NO. 932 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, A CALIFORNIA MUNICIPALITY, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR DEDICATION OF LAND, PAYMENT OF FEES, OR BOTH, FOR PARK AND RECREATION LAND IN SUBDIVISIONS AND ON SINGLE PARCELS AND THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 596. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Purpose. This ordinance is enacted pursuant to the authority granted by Section 66477 of the Government Code of the State of California. The park and recreation facilities for which dedication of land and/or payment of a fee is required by this ordinance are in accordance with the "Aesthetics, Cultural, and Recreation Resources Element" of the General Plan of the City of San Jacinto, adopted by the City of San Jacinto on May 5, 1987. SECTION 2. Requirements. At the time of approval of the tentative map or parcel map, the City Planning Commission shall determine pursuant to Section 4 hereof the land required for dedication or in lieu fee payment. As a condition of approval of a final subdivision map or parcel map, the subdivider shall dedicate land, pay a fee in lieu thereof, or both, at the option of the City Planning Commission, for neighborhood and community park or recreation purposes at the time and according to the standards and formula contained in this ordinance. SECTION 3. General Standard. It is hereby found and determined that the public interest, convenience, health, welfare, and safety require that five acres of property for each 1,000 persons residing with this city be devoted to local park and recreational purposes. SECTION 4. Formula for dedication of land. Where a park or recreation facility has been designated in the "Aesthetics, Cultural, and Recreational Resources Element", an element of the general plan of the city, and is to be located in whole or in part within the proposed subdivision to serve the immediate and future needs of the residents of the subdivision, the subdivider shall dedicate land for a local park sufficient in size and topography that bears a reasonable relationship to serve the present and future needs of the residents of the subdivision. The amount of land to he provided shall be determined pursuant to the following formula: minimum Average No. of Persons/Unit divided by 1,000 population = acreage 5 dedication The following table of population density has been established pursuant to Section 66477(b) of the Government Code: Park Land Dedication Formula Table Types of Dwellings Average Acreage/DU Density/DU (5 ac. std.) Single -Family Detached 2.918 .015 Single -Family Attached 1.747 .0087 2-4 units 2.559 .0128 5+ units 2.236 .112 Mobilehomes 1.614 .0081 Dedication of the land shall be made in accordance with the procedures contained in Section 12 hereof. Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 For the purposes of this section, the number of new dwelling units shall be based upon the number of parcels indicated on the map when in an area zoned for one dwelling per parcel. When all or part of the subdivision is located in an area zoned for more than one dwelling unit per parcel, the number of proposed dwelling units in the area so zoned shall equal the maximum allowed under that zone. In the case of a condominium project, the number of new dwelling units shall be the number of condominium units. The term "new dwelling unit" does not include dwelling units lawfully in place prior to the date on which the parcel or final map is filed. The subdivider, shall, without credit: 1) provide full street improvements and utility connections including, but not limited to curbs, gutters, street paving, traffic control devices, street trees, and sidewalks to land which is dedicated pursuant to this section; 2) provide for fencing along the property line of that portion of the subdivision contiguous to the dedicated land; 3) provide improved drainage through the site; and 4) provide other minimal improvements which the City Planning Commission determines to be essential to the acceptance of the land for recreational purposes. The land to be dedicated and the improvements to be made pursuant to this section shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. SECTION 5. Fee Requirements for New Residential Construction Not Within a subdivision. In addition to any other fee or fees prescribed, every person constructing any new dwelling unit or placing a mobilehome in the City on parcels, or in subdivision or land divisions approved prior to the adoption of this ordinance, unless there has been prior agreement for park dedication in lieu of fees, shall pay to the City Treasurer a fee per the formula established in Section 7. No land dedication is acceptable. For purposes of this section, fair market value shall be the land value as shown on the most current County of Riverside Assessor's records. SECTION 6. Formula for fees in lieu of land dedication. (a) General Formula. If there is no park or recreation facility designated in the "Aesthetics, Cultural, and Recreational Resources Element", to be located in whole or in part within the proposed subdivision to serve the immediate and future needs of the residents of the subdivision, the subdivider shall, in lieu of dedicating land, pay a fee equal to the value of that land, plus 20% toward costs of off -site improvements, prescribedfnr dedication in Section 4 hereof and in an amount determined in accordance with provisions of Section 7 hereof, such fee to be used for a local park which bears a reasonable relationship to serve the present and future residents of the area being subdivided. For the purposes of this ordinance, off -site improvements are defined as those improvements which would have been required if land had been dedicated using the provisions of Section 4. (b) Fees in Lieu of Land; 50 Parcels or Less. If the proposed subdivision contains fifty (50) parcels or less, the subdivider shall pay a fee equal to the land value, plus 20% toward costs of off -site improvements, of the portion of the local park required to serve the needs of residents of the proposed subdivision as prescribed in Section 4 hereof and in an amount determined in accordance with the provisions of Section 7 hereof. However, nothing in this section shall prohibit the dedication and acceptance of land for park and recreation purposes in subdivisions of fifty parcels or less, where the subdivider proposes such dedication voluntarily and the land is acceptable to the Planning Commission. Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (c) Use of Money. The money collected hereunder shall be used only for the purpose of acquiring necessary land and developing new or rehabilitating existing park or recreation facilities reasonably related to serving the subdivision. SECTION 7. Criteria for Requiring Both Dedication and Fee. In subdivisions of more than fifty (50) parcels, the subdivider shall both dedicate land and pay a fee in lieu thereof in accordance with the following formula: (a) When only a portion of the land to be subdivided is proposed on the "Aesthetics, Cultural, and Recreational Resources Element" as the site for a local park, such portion shall be dedicated for local park purposes and a fee computed pursuant to the provision of Section 7 hereof shall be paid for the value of any additional land, plus 20% toward costs of off -site improvements, that would have been required to be dedicated pursuant to Section 4 hereof. (b) When a major part of the local park or recreation site has already been acquired by the city and only a small portion of land is needed from the subdivision to complete the site, such remaining portion shall be dedicated and a fee computed pursuant to the provision of Section 7 hereof shall be paid in an amount equal to the value of the land, plus 20% toward the costs of off -site improvements, which would otherwise have been required to be dedicated pursuant to Section 4 hereof, such fees to be used for the improvement of other local parks and recreation facilities in the area serving the subdivision. SECTION 8. Amount of Fee in Lieu of Land Dedication. When a fee is to be paid in lieu of land dedication, the amount of such fee shall be based upon the fair market value of the amount of land which would otherwise be required for dedication pursuant to Section 4, plus 20% toward costs of off -site improvements, such as extension of utility lines. The fee shall be determined by the following formula: DUs X Pop X 5 acres X FMV = subtotal X 6/5 = in -lieu DU 1,000 people Buildable acre fee where DUs = Number of dwelling units as defined in Section 4 Pop = Population per dwelling unit DU Fair market value, as determined by Section 8 Buildable acre A typical acre of the subdivision, with a slope less than 10%, and located in other than an area on which building is excluded because of flooding, easements, or other restrictions. Fees to be collected pursuant to this section shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. SECTION 9. Determination of Fair Market Value. The fair market value shall be determined by the city with a written appraisal report prepared and signed by an appraiser acceptable to the city. (Note: fee paid by applicant). The appraisal shall be made immediately prior to the filing of the final map. The subdivider shall notify the city of the expected filing date at least six (6) weeks prior to filing of the final map. If more than one (1) year elapses prior to filing the final map, the city will prepare a new appraisal and will bill the subdivider for the cost of the reappraisal. For the purposes of this chapter, the Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 99 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 determination of the fair market value of a buildable acre, as defined in Section 7, shall consider, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: 1. approval of and conditions of the tentative subdivision map 2. the general plan 3. zoning 4. property location 5. off -site improvements facilitating use of the property 6. site characteristics of the property If the subdivider objects to the determined fair market value, he/she may appeal to the City Council who shall hear the appeal under the same rules and obligations current for local board of equalization hearings, except that the burden of proof shall lie with the subdivider. SECTION 10. Determination of Land or Fee. Whether the Planning Commission accepts land dedication or elects to require payment of a fee in lieu thereof, or a combination of both, shall be determined by consideration of the following: (a) The natural features, access, and location of land in the subdivision available for dedication; (b) The size and shape of the subdivision and land available for dedication; (c) The feasibility of dedication; (d) The compatibility of dedication with the "Aesthetics, Cultural, and Recreational Resources Element", and (e) The location of existing and proposed park sites and trailways. The determination of the Planning Commission as to whether land shall be dedicated, or whether a fee shall be charged, or a combination thereof, shall be final and conclusive. SECTION 11. Credit for Private Open Space. No credit shall be given for private open space in the subdivision except as hereinafter provided. Where private open space usable for active recreational purposes is provided in a proposed planned development or real estate development as defined in Sections 11003 and 11003.1 of the Business and Professions Code, partial credit, not to exck,er< (50%), shall be given against the requirement of land dedication or payment of fees in lieu thereof if the Planning Commission finds that it is in the public interest to do so and that all the following standards are met: (a) yards, court areas, setbacks, and other open areas required by the zoning and building ordinances and regulations shall not be included in the computation of such private open space; and (b) Private park and recreation facilities shall be owned by a homes association composed of all property owners in the subdivision and being an incorporated non-profit organization capable of dissolution only by a 100% affirmative vote of the membership, operated under recorded land agreements through which each lot owner in the neighborhood is automatically a member, and each lot is subject to a charge for a proportionate share of expenses for maintaining the facilities. Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (c) use of the private open space is restricted for park and recreation purposes by recorded covenant which runs with the land in favor of the future owners of the property and which cannot be defeated or eliminated without the consent of the city or its successor; and, (d) The proposed private open space is reasonably adaptable for use for park and recreation purposes, taking into consideration such factors as size, shape, topography, geology, access, and location; and, (e) Facilities proposed for the open space are in substantial accordance with the provisions of the "Aesthetics, Cultural, and Recreational Resources Element" of the general plan; and, (f) The open space for which credit is given is generally a minimum of five acres and provides all of the local park basic elements listed below, or a combination of such and other recreation improvements that will meet the specific recreation needs of future residents of the area: (1) Recreational open spaces, which are generally defined as park area for active recreation pursuits such as soccer, golf, baseball, softball, and football, and have at least one acre of maintained turf with less than 5% slope. (2) Court areas, which are generally defined as tennis courts, badminton courts, shuffleboard courts, or similar hard -surfaced areas especially designed and exclusively used for court games. (3) Recreational swimming areas, which are defined generally as fenced areas devoted primarily to swimming, diving or both. They must also include decks, lawn areas, bathhouses, or other facilities developed and used exclusively for swimming and diving and consisting of no less than 15 square feet of water surface area per pool, together with an adjacent deck and/or lawn area twice that of the pool. (4) Recreation buildings and facilities designed and primarily used for the recreational needs of residents of the development. The determination of the Planning commission as to whether credit shall be given and the amount of credit shall be final and conclusive. SECTION 12. Procedure. At the time of approval of the tentative map or parcel map, the Planning Commission shall determine pursuant to Section 4 hereof the land required for dedication. If the Planning Commission requires in -lieu fee, payment by the subdivider, the Planning Commission will set the] amount of land upon which the in -lieu fee will be based at the time of final map approval. At the time of the filing of the final subdivision map or parcel map, the subdivider shall dedicate the land as required by the Planning Commission. Where the Planning Commission has determined, that fees shall be paid in -lieu of or in addition to the dedication of land, the Planning Commission shall set the in -lieu fees based on the land dedication requirements as established at the time of tentative map approval using current land values at the time of final map approval with the formula set forth in Section 7 and using the process for determining fair market value as set forth in Section 8. The subdivider shall pay said fees in accordance with the following schedule: Page 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 (a) For any subdivision consisting of ten (10) or more lots, fees shall be paid, in their entirety, prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building or structure to be located upon any lot in the subdivision. (b) For any subdivision consisting of nine (9) or less lots, fees shall be paid on a lot -by -lot basis and prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building or structure to be located upon any one of the lots in the subdivision. Open space covenants for private park or recreation facilities shall be submitted to the city prior to approval of the final subdivision map or parcel map and shall be recorded contemporaneously with final subdivision map or parcel map. SECTION 13. Disposition of Fees. Fees determined pursuant to Section 7 shall be paid to the City Treasurer and shall be deposited into the subdivision park trust fund, or its successor. Money in said fund, including accrued interest, shall be expended solely for acquisition or development of parkland, or improvements related thereto. Collected fees shall be appropriated by the city to which the land or fees are conveyed or paid for a specific project to serve residents of the subdivision in a budgetary year within five years upon receipt of payment or within five years after the issuance of building permits on one-half of the lots created by the subdivision, whichever occurs later. If such fees are not so committed, these fees, less an administrative charge, shall be distributed and paid to the then record owners of the subdivision in the same proportion that the size of their lot bears to the total area of all lots in the subdivision per Section 66477 (f) of the Government Code. The City Treasurer shall report to the City Council at least annually on income, expenditures, and status of the subdivision park trust fund. SECTION 14. Exemptions. Subdivisions containing less than five parcels and not used for residential purposes shall be exempted from the requirements of this ordinance; provided, however, that a condition shall be placed on the approval of such parcel map that if a building permit is requested for construction of a residential structure or structures on one or more of the parcels the fee may be required to be paid by the owner of each such parcel as a condition to the issuance of such permit. The provisions of the ordinance do not apply to commercial or industrial subdivisions; nor do they apply to condominium projects or stock cooperatives which consist of the subdivision of airspace in an existing apartment building which is more than five years old when no new dwelling units are added. SECTION 15. Subdivider -Provided park and Recreation Improvements. The value of park and recreation improvements provided by the subdivider to the dedicated land shall be credited against the fees or dedication of land required by this ordinance. The Planning Commission reserves the right to approve such improvements prior to agreeing to accept the dedication of land and to require in -lieu fee payments should the land and improvements be unacceptable. SECTION 16. Agency to Accept Land and Fees. Land or fees required under this ordinance shall be conveyed or paid directly to the local public agency which provides park and recreational services on a community -wide level and to the area within which the proposed development will be located, if such agency elects to accept the land or fee. At the time of tentative map approval, the Page 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 99 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Planning Commission shall determine whether the city is the appropriate local agency. The city, county, or other local public agency to which the land or fees are conveyed or paid shall develop a schedule pursuant to Section 66477 of the Government Code specifying how, when, and where it will use the land or fees, or both, to develop park or recreational facilities to serve residents of the subdivision. SECTION 17. Access. All land offered for dedication for local park or recreational purposes shall have access to at least one existing or proposed public street. This requirement may be waived by the Planning Commission if the Planning Commission determines that public street access is unnecessary for maintenance of the park area or use thereof by residents. SECTION 10. Sale of Dedicated Land. If during the ensuing time between dedication of land for park purposes and commencement of first -stage development, circumstances arise which indicate that another site would be more suitable for local park or recreational purposes serving the subdivision and the neighborhood (such as receipt of a gift of additional park land or a change in school location), the land may be sold upon the approval of the City Council with the resultant funds being used for the purchase of a more suitable site. SECTION 19. Conflict. Ordinance No. 596 and/or parts of any other ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 20. Effect of Ordinance. If any section, sub- section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is, for any reason, held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. City Council declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, sub -section, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more of the section, sub -section, sentence, clause or phrase be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the said City Council on the 16th day of April, 1991. MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1991 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk Mayor Page 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1G 17 18 19 20 21 22 n� 4-3 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO I, Nancy Randolph, Deputy City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. 932 duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of 1991. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of 1991. Deputy City Clerk Page 8 ~ , OLCD12 CHECK ISSUED T� JACINTO �-' RL�,ISTER OF AU�ITED DEMANDS ^ UNITED CALIFORNI� B��� A/C 201398 DATE DESCRIPTION A.W OUNT 1 214917* FIRST INTERSTATE BANK AID 97-1 INTEREST PAYMENT 24918* O~K° ASSOC~ INC' RBF'USE COLLECTIONS '24919* NEOS CORPORATION CONFERENCE -FORD 24920* S~J+ CHAMBER -COMMERCE SECRETARY DAY 24921* IAPMA SEMINAR-VEGA &. RA0DOLPH 24922* U+S+ POSTMASTEP REPLENISH POSTAGE METER 24923* ST. BOARD. -EQUALIZATION ANNEX 60 FEES 2 4 9 2 4 * ST^ BOARD .... EQUALIZATION ANNEX 61 FEES 24925* ST^ BOARD~EQUALIZATION ANNEX 62 FEES 24926* ST^ BOARD -EQUAL IZATIUN ANNEX '03 FEES 24927* ST, BOARD -EQUALIZATION ANNEX 64 FEES 24928* SO, CALIFORNIA EDIS0h PAYMENT OF CLAIM 24929* COACHE'LLA VALLEY JOINT SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM 24930* PUBLIC EMP^ RET^ SYSTEM' RETIREMENT 24931* PUBLIC EMP^ RET" SYSTEM RETIREMENT 24932* FIRST INTERSTATE BANK FEDERAL TAXES 24933* FIRST INTERSTATE BANK SS MEDICARE 24934* STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE TAXES 24935* RIVERSIDE CO~ EMP^ CREDIT UNION 24936* S.J. POLICE ASSOC^ SJPD D�ES 24937* PUBLIC EMP~ ASSOC~ pERC 24938* U.S. POSTMASTEK POSTAGE ... WATER BILLS 24939* SAN JACINTO TREASURER�s REPLEHISH PETTY CASH 24940 8ILL RUTLEDGE PC MEFTING 24941 RICHARD HIXSON PC MEETING 24942 DAVID VER PLANK PC M[ETI#G 24943 YVONNE IACO#Q PLANNING COMMISSION 24944 GLENN TAYLOK PC MEETING 24945 A-1 LOCK & KEY PADLOCK & KEYS-F^D. 24946 AT & T LANGUAGE LINE LANGUAtGE LINE'^PD^ Z4947 ALERT BARRICADE STORM 24948 ALPHA DOG & 8UPPL1EC 24949 AL'S LAW|iflDWER SHOP SUPPLI[G & SERVICE 24950 AHERICAN pLANNING ASSC^ CO��FEREQCE�MCNA8B VIDEO. RED CROSS -F 24952 LOUIS R~ ARROYA^ JR~ JAHITO�IAL ,D^ SERVICE 24953 ARROW PRINTING �UR�HA�E ORDERS 24954 E,S^ BABCO[]( & SONS LAB TEsTS... WATER Z4955 HECTOR BAEZA MILEAGE Z4956 BEAR CREEK GOLF CLUF( RETRE) A T-PLANN^ COMM^ Z4957 BIERLY & ASSOCIATES QTR. SERVICE FEE 2495B 8IRMINGHAM'S EDGEP BLADES -PARKS DEPT. Z4959 BOBIS LUMBER CONCRET�-WATER DEPT. 24960 E,K^ BURKE INSF`ECT BLDG. AJACENT TO MUSEUM 24961 ,/OHN R^ BYERLY INC~ COMPACTION~C~F.[/^ Z-1962 CHEROKEE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE MAINT^ 24963 CITY OF SAN JACINTO rOiNSUME� I/EPOSITS �4964 BREA TRADING CONSUMER, DEPOSITS -24965 TIMOTHY TREADWELL COHSUMER DEPOSITS ?4966 KADIR EKERMAN CONSUMER DEPOSITS �4967 GLORIA l.EONARD CONC5UMER DEPOSITS 54,247.50 71^492^33 125^O0 137^50 100^00 975°0D 160.00 160^0O 35O.<)0 25O^O0 250^0O 2,772,70 2,0o0.0D 18,369^14 37~33 16,8O4.42 1,760^68 3,817~92 2,189.0O 1,032.00 4b5.28 193^93 98.69 100^00 1OO^00 1DO^OO 100.00 100^DO 51.20 25.00 2,104^55 67^26 34,95 70~00 105,0O 1,214.0O 490.30 156°OO 23.14 3O6^82 600.00 22.37 6~29 75.UO 305.00 2'4OO^0O 1,167.51 62^44 9,96 18^0O 41^10 GLCD12 Tf OF S�� JACINTO � CHECK UNITED ISSUED TO 24968 CLARENCE MCFARLIND 24969 MARIA MEJIA 24970 ROBE8T JEPSON 24971 DAVID ENRIQUEZ 24972 FRANK BEAN 24973 D+ HEDGE 24974 MERLE MCBRIDE 24975 GRIFFITH CONST^ 24976 SHELLY GARCI8 24977 SAM SCHR8CK 24978 LYNNE HUGHES 24979 LUCY FOLEY 24980 ROBERT SANDOVAL 24981 NATALIE BASZILE 24982 COM SER CO~ 24983 DEWEY'S ELECTRIC 24984 DISCOUNT VACUUM 24985 EASTERN MUNI^WATER DIST 24986 ENGINEERS SALES 24907 F & W GUNS 24988 FERGUSDN^PRAET & SHEHiih 24989 FIRE TECHNOLOGY 24990 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK 24991 1ST MUNICIPAL DIVISION 24992 TOM FLENNIKEN & ASSC, 24993 FDNTA#A PAVINGS. INC'. 24994 G K N RENTALS 24995 GTE MOBILE COMM~ 24996 GENERAL TELEPHONE CD, 24997 TAMRA 8ERARD 24998 JACK GOSCH FORD 25000 11AYNE5 FlRE EXTG^ SER�~ 25OO1 HEMET NEWS 25002 HEME�T POLICE I/EPT^ 25003 HEMET VALLEY MEDICAL 25004 HEMET VALLEY TOOL- 25OO5 HILLTOP SOFTWARE SERV. 25006 HOUSE OF QUALITY 250O7 ICMA 25OO8 ICMA 250O9 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 25010 C.R. JAESCHKE INC, 25O11 CYNTHIA JEFFS 25012 KF:RN EQUIPT^ CU^ 25O13 KING SIGN COMPANY 25014 KENNETH LEAHY 25015 MARSH & MCLENNAN 25016 MATICH CORPORATION 25017 THE MEYERS GROUP 25018 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSUMER CONSUMER CONSUMER CONSUMER CONSUMER CONSUMER CONSUMER CONSUMER CONSUMER CONSUMER CONSUMER CONSUMER CONSUMER CONSUMER A/C 201398 DATE 4/30/91 DEPOSITS DEPOSITS DEPOSITS DEPOSITS DEPOSITS DEPOSITS DEPOSITS DEPOSITS DEPOSITS DEPOSITS DEPOSITS DEPOSITS DEPOSITS DEPOSITS MONTHLY MAINTENANCE CHANGE BALLAST—P.D. REPAIR VACUUM--P.D. UTILITIES BELLOWS. FUSES—P. W. 2-D SHOTGUN SLINGS~P+D, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE RENEg SUBSCRIPTION--F^D^ ASST. DIST^ 87-1 BROOMSWEEPER LEASE POLYGRi'niPHS--P.D^ CLA5S 2 BASE CONCRETE --WATER DEPT. MOBILE TELEPHONE —PUBLIC WORK5 PHONE SERVICES LOGO & ECO~ DEVLP^ FOLDER TOWING~P^D^ STATE CO~ OF THE ADDRESS—B�Y�IH FIRE EXTG~ SERVICE�P.D^ C3MMUNITY CLEAN—UP AD �SSET 1�01RFEITURE SE��IHA�—GARCIA�F.D~ HOSE^ COUPLING—P.W. PROGR'AMMING SERVICES —WATER DEPT^ AUTO PARTS SUBSCRIPTION^EASTER HEMBERSHIF—EASTER C�LD MIX FLOAT & BLADEG�P,W^ METERBOUKS INPUT .... PAYROLL, TIRE ASSY—SWEEPER POLICE RANCiE SIGN COU#GJL CONFERENCE HISC~ CASUALTY PREMIUM A^C^ OVERLAY -`VARIOUS LOCATIONS COHMERCIAL DEMAND ANALYSIS C4F^D~ 02 & AD87--- 1 AMOUNT 25^0O 2O^00 14^39 11.99 50"00 8~34 43°35 357^34 23^88 1B^68 33,67 30°04 10,08 6°43 812,60 67^95 2D^$0 482.55 150.98 31B^44 19'659.92 39,5O 2,744~18 1,585.25 150,OU 65^50 157.62 144.70 1,338^46 533~56 297^75 15.00 2D,0O 356^88 283^43 5O^OO 95^85 220.00 790^55 635^0O 25+00 415~09 354^9O 434^0O 213~00 154~43 50^0O 16O^80 10~64O.51 5,60�~58 8,044~O1 GLCD12 F.lT� OF 3AN JACINTO � PAGE 3 CHECK ISSUED T(,.f 25019 MUNICIPAL ENG~CONSLTNT° 25020 #ATL^FIRE PROT^ASSOc^ 25021 N8S/LOWRY 25022 MORTON BATTERY MFG^ CO~ 25{)23 PACIFIC MANAGEMENT 25024 PACTELL CELLULAR ---LA 25025 P^S° HARLEY~DAVIDSON 25026 PA8ENET 25027 PAGTER~LAW CORP. 25028 PRESS -ENTERPRISE 25029 QUALITY TRANSMISSIONS 25030 QUA8T TREE SERVICE 25031 RACEWAY FORD 25032 RAMQNA ANIMAL HAVEN INC 25033 Ml|{E READE CHEV, 25034 RELIABLE HOME OFFICE 25035 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 25036 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 25037 SAFETY~KLEEN CORP" 25038 CITY OF SAN JACINTO 25039 SAN JACINTQ ELECTRIC 25040 S^J^ WORKERS' COMP. 25041 SCOTSMAN MANUFACTURING 25042 SHARP BUILDING SUFPLY 25043 BILL STMPSON 25044 SO+ CALIFORNIA ED1SON 25045 SO. CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 25046 S0`ANO PRESS 25047 STATE CENSUS DATA 25048 STEVE'S AUTO PARTS 25049 T N T CATERING 25O5O TILLINGHAST yU�LICATlD� 25051 TIGER TEMP 25052 JAMES W^ UNLAND 23O53 VALLEY RESOURCE CENTER 25054 A. VAN b:LOE�HEN PRINTING 25055 CARL WARREN 25056 CARL WARREN & CO. 25057 WINANS/LEE PARTNERSHIP 2505B WRITE PRICE 25059 XEROX CORPORATION 25060 ZEP MANUFACTURING 25061 ZUMAR INC. * Pro-naid checks A/C 201398 DATE 4/30/91 �ESCRIPTION EHGINEERING SERVICES -AD 07^1 &CFD MEMBEP5HIP~F~D^ TRAFFIC SIGNAL^C~F~D BATTER IES-P,D~ CONTRACTOR INFORMATION SYSTEM CELLULAR PHONE-F.D. MOTORCYCLE SERVICE RENTAL RADIO PAGERS-F.D. LEGAL SERVICES -AD 87~1 DISPLAY AD-COMM. CLEAN-UP REBUILD TRANS-11:106 TREE TRIMMING PARTS-P^D^ ANIMALS -MARCH VEHICLE PARTS-P.D. & COMM. DEuLP~ ELECTRONIC LETTER OPENER BLUEPRINTING -PLANNING FORFEITURE FUND~P^D, MACHINE SER\/ICE-ALL DEPARTMENTS UTILITY BILLS STREET LIGHT REPAIRS REIMBURSE ACCOUNT MGHTHLY LEASE�OFFICE/P,D^ BUILDING SUPPLIES OVERPAYMENT-WATEIR BILL UTILITY UTILITY PUTLISAING-COUNCIL REPORT -CO. OF RIVERSIDE VEH� PARTS C�TERING-P.�. DIRECTOR S�BSCKI�T�UN-GRMR REfqT DL,"F-TEMPORARY POWER-C.F.D. PREPAR� SITE PLAN �NSEr%T �ATER BILLS P^D^ FORM IHSUR�NCE ADJUSTERS~GASKIN INSURANCE ADJUSTERS OVERPAYMENT -WATER BI S��-)Rp PAD & ERASER --CIVIC 1 CASE R'EACH HAND YARD STREET GIGNS-P.W, FINAL TOTAL Voided Ck# 24940 replaced with CkfJ 25062 Voided Ck# 24941 replaced with Ck# 25063 2 AMOUNT 2 1,587.O3 75^0O 8,145~52 175.1O 452.83 54,59 416~44 126.50 5,167^75 2O3^6D 1,45D^83 4,900.71 130.32 287^0O 369^73 13^94 51,73 1'510.0O 228.75 239~O4 736,54 13~417^40 871^17 728~O6 30^42 8,469^44 159.36 29^19 15^OD 273~13 159.75 9O^00 107~5O 275^5O 196^5S 266^25 55^O8 1,674~42 58,01 25~54 651^4O 83,69 814^57 38O,9R FUND 10 FUND 14 FUND 18 FUND 20 FUND 21 FUND 23 FUND 24 FUND 25 FUND 28 FUND 31 34,362.29 1,017.47 600.00 26,412.92 10,915.06 2,634.17 909.45 9,330.17 52.01 695.88 TOTAL $300,464.98 FUND 36 11,031.42 FUND 37 995.00 FUND 40 1,565.25 FUND 42 66,735.04 FUND 50 7,530.83 FUND 65 73,444.53 FUND 66 1,947.86 FUND 96 5,701.43 PAYROLL 44,495.77 MISC. REVENUE 88.43 INFORMATIONAL MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: May 3, 1991 SUBJ: Growth Management Task Force "VISION FOR RIVERSIDg COUNTY" Pam had asked City Staff to review the document "A VISION FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY" the 21st Century and comment on it. The Planning Department has completed its review and has the following comments: 1. The basic concept of A UNITED VISION FOR THE COUNTY, endorsed by all jurisdictions is an attractive, but difficult goal to achieve. We endorse the effort. 2. Land Use: Urban Centers - the description seems to preclude rural uses from being within urban centers. 3. Land Use: Agricultural Areas - this section appears to preclude agricultural uses within an incorporated city. It also specifically identifies the San Jacinto Valley as destined for permanent agricultural uses. This raises the question as to whether there is already a predetermined urban limit. 4. Land Use: Natural Areas - According to this section, natural areas such as mountain ridges would be preserved as assets of public value. While this is a positive generic goal, it fails to take into account the individual needs of any given community. For example: this goal may affect any potential development on North Mountain as well as the mountainous area of Annexation 66. As a result San Jacinto could lose out on housing opportunities for upper income households and resort development opportunities which may be essential to the local economy. 5. Quality of Life Issues: Job Development - The document states job opportunities will be created to eliminate excessive use of the transportation network in order to reduce air quality impacts. Staff feels there should be an emphasis on job development, including possibly added incentives, in areas which might typically be considered bedroom communities. We are forwarding a copy of this memo to A. J. Wilson of WRCOG and would appreciate Council input in the matter. Respectfully Submitted, BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM: lr MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: May 2, 1991 SUBJECT: Vision Statement WRCOG has asked all Western Riverside County Cities to review and approve the attached "Vision Statement". A.J. Wilson, Executive Director of WRCOG, will be present at the Council meeting of May 7, to answer any questions and to receive any changes or suggestions from you. ESTE" RIVEFII E C U CIL OF ©VE County of Rtversida * Ctty of Banning • Clty of Corona * Ctty of Hemel • Ctty of Lake Elsinore * Cfty of Moreno Valley • City of Norco • Cfty of Perris • Ctty of Riverside * City of San Jacinto * City of Temecula MEMORANDUM TO: City Managers and Riverside County C.A.O. FROM: A.J. Wilson, Executive Director, WRCOG DATE: April 3, 1991 SUBJECT: Growth Management "Vision statement" You will recall that WRCOG, in conjunction with CVAG, established a Growth Management Task Force in October of 1990. The purpose of this Task Force was to formulate a growth management strategy for Riverside County as a geographical area which would have the support of both City and County Governments. That Task Force has been hard at work. They have endeavored to focus the process to establish a sense of direction and policies which would ultimately direct the entire process. To do that, they all contributed their views on the "vision" for our future. They then asked that a summary document be prepared that reflected those paints of view. The attached draft "Vision Statement" was the result. It has been preliminarily reviewed by the Executive Committee of WRCOG. They have asked that each member jurisdiction formally review the policies in the document and return your input to the WRCOG offices by the end of May so they -may be incorporated into a final "Vision Statement" at our June meeting. We would ask that you schedule review by your City Council. In order to insure clear understanding of the intent of the policies, I will endeavor to be present at the Council or Board of Supervisors meetings to give a summary presentation if you deem that appropriate. Please contact our office, 787-7985, to inform us of when the matter will be scheduled for consideration. We are hopeful that there will be serious consideration by each Governing body since this will insure the Growth Management program will reflect the desires of everyone. Thank. you for your cooperation. We plan a briefing at the April TAC meeting to offer you the first opportunity to review the matter. 3544 University Avenue, Riverside, CA 92501 * (714) 787-7985 * FAX (714) 787-7920 GROWTH MANAGEMENT TASK FORCE "A Vision for Riverside County". The 21st Century (The following is a draft statement prepared by the Growth Management Task Force. It represents a compilation of the concepts and ideas which were drawn from members submitted vision statements.) Riverside County in the 21st century is envisioned as a area which will be a diverse community of diverse life styles. We would want - a community which has developed quality urban areas complete with job opportunities, economic activity, and residential choices for all economic levels. At the same time, throughout the growth process we envision a preservation of the natural open space, the agricultural areas, and the rural communities which are our unique heritage. Our vision = `^cused on the maintenance of a quality life style for the peuplc who will reside in Riverside County. The horizon of that vision must be limited to the levels of growth which may occur within the context. of a quality life style. Therefore the growth must be carefully planned and reflects the following elements. 1. Land Use Riverside County of the 21st Century should reflect a balanced land use with the following major elements. -a. Urban Centers: Development and growth of urbanization would occur within urban centers. These centers would be urban service centers and contain urban and suburban housing choices for all income groups as well as urban recreation, education, and cultural facilities. b. Buffer Areas: The areas between the urban centers would be buffer areas. They would be composed of rural residential communities, open space preserves, and regional parks and recreational facilities. c. Transportation Corridors: The urban centers would be joined together by transportation corridors comprising a first class circulation network not only of freeways and arterial roads but public transportation including rapid rail service corridors. d. Agricultural Areas: Specific areas within the urbanizing county would be retained and preserved for agricultural uses. This would not be an effort to hold land for later urbanization. Rather it would preserve major areas as agricultural within the context of balanced community plans. i.e. Hemet/San Jacinto Valley. e. Natural Areas: Natural areas of the county ( Mountain ridges, stream beds, desert areas) would be preserved as assets of public value. They will serve as ecological preserves, habitat for endangered species, near by open space resources for residents, and provide definition and buffers of natural beauty between urban centers. 2. Quality of Life Issues To insure a high quality of life there must be management systems set in place to address problems which could undermine our lifestyle. a. Air Quality: A cooperative effort of local governments must provide the controls on growth and development to insure an improved air quality. Economic development must be encouraged only within this context of preserving the quality of the air we breath. b. Water: The achievement of the goals of a balanced urban community with economic growth as well as the maintenance of agriculture as a major element in our future requires a reliable source of water. Comprehensive policies and conservation measures must be a part of our future growth strategy. c. Water Quality: The achievement of the Vision will only occur if sufficient waste water treatment facilities are available to meet the demands created by urbanization. A regional waste water masterplan, consistent with the landuse vision, needs to be adopted. c. Transportation: The achievement of our vision cannot occur if the growth and development of our county causes -a breakdown in our transportation .circulation systems. A comprehensive network of corridors which include advance applications of rapid transit will be necessary. d. Job Development: To reduce air quality impacts, to eliminate excessive use of the transportation network, and to provide opportunities for employment near family and community the development of jobs within the county will be required. e. Education: To provide support for the families of our county the provision of adequate facilities and programs in public and private education is essential. A development and growth policy to achieve our goals will include means to provide the needed school facilities. f. Human Services: Support for families, the elderly, and others in need will be provided to insure all Riverside County residents can enjoy their rights to live safe and decent lives and enjoy the benefits of freedom and dignity which are guaranteed to every American. g. solid Waste Disposal: Our vision requires the implementation of a subregional solid waste disposal plan which will provide for recycling and waste stream separation. landfills will be unable to meet the requirements of future growth without such a strategy. h. Variety of Life Style Choices: Our vision would protect opportunities for life style choices with commensurate service levels provided in each area of the county. i. Protection of Life and Property: To insure the ability to provide basic protection of property and life for all residents i.e. adequate flood control, safety services, etc. Local Government Leadership. Local general purpose governments, (Cities and County Government) will need to establish a cooperative effort to lead a public/private coalition to achieve this vision of a county of excellence. The provision of support for the: high quality of life standards and the implementation of effective planning and landuse decisions as well as infrastructure development will only occur through effective local government effort. a. Financially Sound Local Government: Local government financial programs must be established to insure adequate financial support for city, county, and educational services and programs which are essential to our quality of life. Joint efforts to achieve fiscal stability for cities and the county government are essential to our vision. b. A Growth Management Structure: To implement this vision there must be public policies adopted by local governments which would implement this plan for the 21st Century. This would include the attachment of all new urbanized growth to urban centers,the efficient phasing of public services, the establishment of methods to preserve open space and agricultural areas, and the establishment of cooperative efforts to implement standards which will address the quality of life issues. A framework of effective growth management needs to be implemented in the near future if growth is to be directed in a fashion to implement this vision. c. Sub Regional Plans: In recognition of the unique areas within Riverside county, we would envision the development of sub regional plans for Western Riverside County, the Coachella Valley, and the Palo Verde Valley, which would reflect a specific plan of implementation for our vision in each area. The cooperative effort of the existing COGs should provide the forum for these efforts. d. Service Providers: Our vision of the 21st century assumes the cities will be the urban services providers and county government will focus on county wide services which will support the quality of life in all areas of the county. If any urban centers remain unincorporated, i.e. Sun City, they would be expected to establish CSDs or other financing and service provision networks in order to provide urban services. The option of joint contracting between cities to appreciate economies of scale within "multi -city urban centers" needs to be carefully evaluated. e. Regional Participation: To insure the quality of life within Riverside county, the cities and county government must establish an effective partnership to impact the shape of regional solutions. This will include effective lobby efforts at regional and state levels on issues such as air quality, transportation, water policy, etc. Conclusion: We all have great hopes for the future of Riverside County. -.-We believe we have the opportunity to intercer?e- in the growth and development process in a fashion which will allow for reasonable levels of growth consistent with our communities ability to provide the facilities and services needed to protect our quality of life. We all share the goal of economic growth and prosperity. We do so, however, with the belief that managed growth can achieve that prosperity and not destroy the natural beauty and resources nor the social quality of life for all Riverside County residents. We believe a reasonable growth management policy can achieve this essential balance. MINUTES San Jacinto City Council and the Council Sitting as the Redevelopment Agency and Industrial Development Authority Regular Adjourned Meeting April 16, 1991 The regular meeting of the San Jacinto City Council, the Council sitting as the Redevelopment Agency and Industrial Development Authority was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Boykin at the Community Center, 625 S. Pico Avenue. Roll Call - Present: Councilmen Boykin, Ford, Hafliger, Rose and Councilwoman Leahy. Staff Members: Acting City Manager McNabb, Assistant City Manager Garcia, Finance Director Vega, Police Chief Kozma, and City Attorney Cox. Moment of Silence for Reflection Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Boykin. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes of April 2, 1991. B. Approval of Warrant Nos. 24794 through 24916, in the amount of $352,199.21, as submitted by the Finance Director. C. Award of Contract to the Nadel Partnership, Inc. for Master Planning Services for area east of San Jacinto Avenue, between Esplanade and Commonwealth. (Staff recommends approval.) D. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1953 A Resolution of the City of San Jacinto to authorize advance and investment of funds to Special Assessment District No. 87-1. (City Attorney recommends approval.) April 16, 1991 Minutes Page 2 E. Financial Report of Activity for period ending March 31, 1991, as submitted by Finance Director. (Receive and file.) F. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1954 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto to support the San Jacinto Chamber of Commerce/Military Affairs Committee with their efforts to retain the 943rd Tactical Airlift Group at March A.F.B. (Staff recommends approval.) G. Request for maternity leave of absence, without pay, from Grace Martinez, Account Clerk I, from April 8 through approximately May 21, 1991. (Staff recommends approval.) H. Contract with John Carl Warnecke & Associates. Authorization for City Manager to suspend contract with architectural firm. (City Attorney recommends approval.) Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1955 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto establishing Interim Park Standards for the City. (Staff recommends adoption.) Change Order Nos. 1 & 2 Western Landscaping Construction Project: CFD #2 - Phase I Change Order No. 1 - Reduction in contract price as a result in a change of valves in order to receive an extended warranty for the controller system (reduction of $7,122.00 to total contract.) Change Order No. 2 - Repair of erosion caused by rain(increase of $27,644.00 to total contract.) (Staff recommends approval of Change Orders No. 1 & 2) 2 April 16, 1991 Minutes Page 3 K. Change order No. 6 Matich Corporation Project: CFD #2 - Phase I Change Order No. 6 - Repair of streets caused by rain (increase of $18,264.00.) (Staff recommends award of bid to Matich Corporation and consider contract as Change Order No. 6) L. Amendment to Tract 26020-1 Applicant: Rice -Young Pacific Location: between Evans and Shaver, west of Mountain Avenue. Proposal to amend configuration of two (2) lots (Staff recommends approval.) M. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda pursuant to City Attorney. Councilwoman Leahy asked when the award of contract to Nadel Partnership (Item I-C) would be effective? Mr. McNabb advised approximately one week. Ms. Leahy asked what the interim referred to for park standards (Item I -I). Mr. McNabb advised that a formal resolution will be put in place at the time of amending the General Plan and this resolution is to fill the gap of time. Councilman Ford questioned the change of sizes of valves in the landscaping (Item I-J). Acting City Manager McNabb advised that the valves were being changed to receive an extended warranty from Rain Bird. Councilman Ford further stated that if the work (I-K) had been done right in the first place, it would not have to be done again. Mr. McNabb stated that the original contract for landscaping services should have allowed for erosion control at the beginning of Phase I. Phase II of CFD #2 will address this problem at the onset. Councilman Hafliger stated that staff should have been provided at the onset of Phase I for monitoring of all contracts under this project. 3 April 16, 1991 Minutes Page 4 Mike Byrd, representing Friedman Homes, a developer in CFD #2 stated he was glad that the repair work contract work was being awarded as it directly affected their development. Mr. McNabb advised Mr. Byrd that he would have Matich work directly with Friedman Homes to give them early consideration. Motion by Councilman Rose to approve consent calendar items A through M and adopt Resolution Nos. 1953, 1954 and 1955 and waive the readings in full. Seconded by Councilman Ford. Motion carried: 5-0. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Environmental Impact Assessment and Tentative Tract Maps 24050, 24051, 24052, 24053, 24054, 24055, 24056, 24057, 26426, 24627 Applicant: PR Equities Location: approximately 600 feet east of Hewitt Street, north of Washington Avenue, west of Meridian Street, south of Esplanade Avenue and Commonwealth Avenue Community Development Director McNabb relayed to Council that the applicant (PR Equities) requests a continuance due to ongoing meetings with Staff and the School Board on mitigating fees. Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to continue to meeting of May 21, 1991. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Motion carried: 5-0. B. Adoption of Fees for Processing of Various Development Applications. Councilman Ford advised that Staff had requested this item be continued to May 7, 1991 for an informational update. 4 April 16, 1991 Minutes Page 5 Motion by Councilman Ford to continue to meeting of May 7, 1991. Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 5-0. C. Establishment of Park Fees Community Development Director McNabb advised Council that park fees were set at $.10 per square foot of commercial use and $.01 per square foot of residential use. Mr. McNabb further advised that the ordinance setting the land dedication regulations puts us in compliance with the Quimby Act, setting a ratio of 5 acres per 1000 population ratio. Councilman Ford asked if the ordinance contained any discrepancies from the Quimby Act. Mr. McNabb stated that our Ordinance No. 932 is a model ordinance. Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 932 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, a California municipality, establishing regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreation land in subdivisions and on single parcels and the repeal of Ordinance No. 596. Mayor Boykin opened the Public Hearing. The City Clerk stated that no written or oral communications had been received concerning the public hearing and that affidavit of publication is on file in the Clerk's Office. As no one wished to be heard, the Mayor closed the Public Hearing. Motion by Councilman Rose to introduce Ordinance No. 932 to second reading, with amendment on Section 4. and waive the reading in full. Seconded by Councilman Ford. Motion carried: 5-0. 5 April 16, 1991 Minutes Page 6 D. Proposed removal of weeds, rubbish and refuse Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1950 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, overruling objections and detei,uining to proceed with abatement. Acting City Manager McNabb relayed to Council that the notices had been sent out to all property owners of vacant lots. The Mayor opened the Public Hearing. The Deputy City Clerk stated that affidavit of publication is on file and that no written or verbal communication has been received in the Clerk's Office. City Attorney Cox requested an amendment be included in the Resolution to add to Resolution No. 1950, Section 2. that the Public Hearing was continued to April 16, 1991, to provide for proper notice to all owners.(The Public Hearing was originally scheduled for April 2, 1991, but the notices were not mailed in a timely manner. Section 3. to be revised to read ...public hearing on April 16, 1991,... Motion by Councilman Rose to adopt Resolution No. 1950 with amendments requested by City Attorney Cox and waive the reading in full. Seconded by Councilman Ford. Motion carried: 5-0. E. North Mountain Project (continued from March 5 and March 19, 1991) General Plan Amendment 1-91 and Change of Zone 2-91 2. Surface Mining Mr. McNabb recapped that several public hearing sessions had been held describing all issues; annexation process, Specific Plan and EIR Process, Fast Track vs Regular Track, CEQA question, Risk, Recommendations, Surface Mine Status, and Compliance Options. Mr. McNabb also stated that the EIR will address the 6 April 16, 1991 Minutes Page 7 alternate access(es) to top of mountain. It was also stated that the public hearing and negative declaration continued to this meeting relate to the zone change and general plan. The Specific Plan will require a separate EIR. As the Public Hearing was not closed on March 5, or March 19, 1991, the Mayor advised the Council and audience that the Public Hearing was still open. Letters opposing the North Mountain Project and/or the surface mining operation were received from the following individuals: Robert V. Lindquist, Jr. (A Resident of the San Jacinto Valley), Cathy Hall, 1785 N. Marjorie Lane, San Jacinto, and Robert Hewitt, 588 Rosario Avenue, San Jacinto. Councilwoman Leahy stated she did not feel qualified at this time and needs further time and information to review entire proposal. Councilman Ford inquired how many police officers it would take to fully man a mountain station. Chief Kozma advised six (6) officers plus a supervisor. Mayor Boykin inquired if the CUP for the surface mining operation had gone through review. Mr. McNabb advised that the Staff review was set for April 18, 1991 and will go to the Planning Commission in May or June. Mr. McNabb advised that, at this time, the Council was looking for a motion for direction on the surface mining left. The options are: 1)continue, 2)table for completion of the EIR or 3)approve General Plan with negative declaration and mitigating factors and prepare ordinance. Councilwoman Leahy asked if the zone change must be accomplished prior to going to LAFCO. Mr. McNabb advised that the General Plan and zoning must be consistent and notification of any proposals for property must be provided to LAFCO. Mr. McNabb further advised that a Specific Plan is like a mini General Plan and 7 April 16, 1991 Minutes Page 8 that the application could be filed in 30-60 days if the General Plan and Zone Change are adopted. Mr. McNabb concluded that the City's interest in adoption goes only with a viable project. Councilwoman Leahy asked whether the EIR will state that the project is not feasible. Mr. McNabb stated that this could be the conclusion if issues cannot be mitigated. Councilman Hafliger inquired if the EIR included the summit and mining operation. Staff advised that was correct. Mr. Hafliger stated that the surface mining status with compliance options No. 2 increases concern with moving the operation north on toward the mountain, from face of mountain how high up will the cutting be. Mr. McNabb advised that the engineers will have to stake before the new CUP is considered. Councilman Hafliger additionally requested if the amount of dollars sales tax the City will receive in income from the surface mining project been determined. Mr. McNabb advised approximately $8,000 was received during calendar year 1990. Councilman Hafliger additionally questioned what grade is? Staff advised the grade point was wherever the grading plan shows. Mayor Boykin expressed his concern at this point on the stability of the project and the mountain, stating earthquake preparedness is a definite factor with the soil in this area. He additionally stated that he did not want to see a road cut up the front of the mountain, but was in favor of the project if it can be established with another ingress/egress. At this point, Councilman Hafliger requested Community Development Director McNabb to illustrate benching. Mr. McNabb illustrated benching on a blackboard for the Council. Roger Morgan, project applicant, stated to Council that the proposed expansion of the mountain had been the same for the past eight years. 8 April 16, 1991 Minutes Page 9 Lockheed is now talking concerning the sale of their property for another access. Mr. Morgan inquired of Police Chief Kozma if the Summit could deputize their own security people for the top of the mountain and eliminate the need for a police station. Police Chief Kozma stated this was not a possibility. Councilman Hafliger stated that he was very concerned with the conditional use permit being in existence over eight years and still not in compliance. Mr. Morgan stated that the scar on the mountain was not a compliance issue as the mountain was in the County at that time. Councilman Hafliger also questioned the feasibility of advertising the mountain to hang gliders. Mr. Morgan stated his group was not involved in this. Shawn Hannegan, 390 W. 7th St., came before Council addressing the Hemet News article and "fast - tracking" the EIR. Mayor Boykin advised that the EIR and General Plan/Zone Change are done in tandem. Dewitt Hazelton, Lake Street, Hemet, expressed his concern as a resident of the Valley over the changing of North Mountain. He also expressed that he does not believe "fast tracking" is appropriate and that the EIR should first be in hand. Brian McNabb stated that it is possible that the EIR is 9 months to one year away from being given to the City Council. As no one else wished to speak, the Mayor closed the Public Hearing. Motion by Mayor Boykin to table General Plan 1-91 and Change of Zone 2-91 until completion of EIR. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Motion carried: 5-0. 9 April 16, 1991 Minutes Page 10 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS A. Request for waiver of at Valley Wide on May Mr. Muehring relayed from the Circus would Drugs" program. fees for Kiwanis Club Circus 9, 1991 - John Muehring to Council that the proceeds be applied to the "Say No To Motion by Councilman Rose to waive fees for the Kiwanis on May 9, 1991. Seconded by Councilman Hafliger. Motion carried: 5-0. IV. Club Circus B. Pastor Lehmeier, 1521 Sandlewood Drive, Hemet, sent a letter to each of the Council Members, requesting the City of San Jacinto to help his outreach to the homeless by purchasing the Vosburg Hotel for a tax shelter. Mayor Boykin referred the matter to Staff and requested they come back to Council at the meeting of May 7, 1991. C. Collette Salisbury, 901 W. Esplanade, San Jacinto, came to Council on behalf of the Teen Project (thru Valley Wide), requesting letters of support/commitment to the Teen Project from both the Mayor and the City Manager. Acting City Manager McNabb and Mayor Boykin advised they would both prepare letters of support for the Valley Teen Project. CITY DEPARTMENTS A. Ramona Days/Cinco de Mayo - Councilwoman Leahy and Henry Garcia Councilwoman Leahy requested the use of the fire truck stored at City Yard for entry into the Ramona Pageant and Cinco de Mayo Parades. 10 April 16, 1991 Minutes Page 11 B. Exploration of Joint Public Safety Facilities with the City of Hemet - Pamela Easter, Joe Kozma and Ross Chadwick Police Chief Kozma advised that the areas being considered for joint facilities are jail, training, evidence room, fuel storage and vehicle maintenance. Motion by Councilman Hafliger to authorize City staff to study the possibility/feasibility of joint facilities with the City of Hemet. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Motion carried: 5-0. Councilwoman Hafliger stated that the City should look into cooperative efforts with the County also. C. 2010 Committee - Pamela Easter Motion by Councilman Ford to endorse 2010 Chairman Clayton Record's program outline and select an Executive Committee to be endorsed by the Mayor. Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 5-0. V. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS A. Certificates of Appreciation - Councilwoman Leahy After discussion of time required by Staff to initiate certificates, and qualification for receiving certificate, it was decided that Mayor Boykin will make decision for issuance based upon Council recommendation. B. Pumpers' Association: Appointment of Delegate - Mayor Boykin recommended the appointment of Henry Hafliger as the City's delegate to the Pumpers' Association. 11 April 16, 1991 Minutes Page 12 Motion by Councilman Ford to ratify the Mayor's selection of Henry Hafliger as the City's delegate to the Pumper's Association. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Motion carried: 5-0. C. Councilwoman Leahy requested an update from Staff on what is the best use for the Vosburg, i.e., Civic Center? She requested a list of expenditures, by item (plumbing, electrical) required to bring the building to code. Councilman Rose suggested Ms. Leahy speak with the Fire Department and building inspectors. Councilman Hafliger advised that the use would need to be determined prior to estimates of required expenditures. Mr. McNabb stated that it would cost approximately $15,000 to get a formal evaluation of the structure. Ms. Leahy asked for an update on the plans received from Kammeyer for Hofmann Park. Asst. City Manager Garcia advised that the plans had been received on Friday, April 12, 1991 and were in Plan Check. Mayor Boykin requested a meeting be set for early May concerning the Hofmann Park and donated amenities. Councilwoman Leahy requested an update on the Rent Review Ordinance. Asst. City Manager Garcia relayed that Staff is reviewing ordinances of other cities and working to put together an ordinance, additionally advising that the committee would need to meet in 2-4 months with the parks and the mobile home owners association. A tentative outline will be provided to Council at the second May meeting. Councilwoman Leahy advised that the fence around the old City Yard is in disrepair and needs to be repaired to avoid a possible accident and lawsuit. Ms. Leahy additionally mentioned a technique for emptying the dumpster at City Yard with less effort involved. Councilwoman Leahy asked for and received an update from Police Chief Kozma on the bicycle auction. Chief Kozma advised that the bikes have been separated and tagged. 12 April 16, 1991 Minutes Page 13 VI. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Pending Litigation Motion by Councilman Ford to go into Executive Session for the discussion of pending litigation (Southern California Edison vs City of San Jacinto) at 10:25 p.m. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Motion carried: 5-0. Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to return to Regular Session at 10:31. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Motion carried: 5-0 Let the record show that no action was taken. VII. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Councilman Ford to adjourn to May 7, 1991 at 6:30 p.m. for an Executive Session. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Motion carried: 5-0. Approved by: Maurice Armster City Clerk Meeting adjourned at 10:32 p.m. 13 Respectfully submitted, Nancy Randolph Deputy City Clerk MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members FROM: Nancy Randolph, Deputy City Clerk DATE: May 5, 1991 SUBJECT: Addition to Consent Calendar - 5/7/91 Attached is a request from the 55th Ohio Volunteer Infantry Regiment received by our Police Department on May 3, 1991. They are re- questing permission to discharge a firearm within our City limits (San Jacinto Cemetary District) on May 18 or 17, 1991. As this request was not received by the City Clerk's Office in time to be placed on the agenda, it will require a 4/5's Council vote to place on the agenda if that is Council's desire. On checking with the City Attorney, Mr. Cox advised that if Council desires, the item can be placed at the end and included in the Consent Calendar. nr 55th 0 2nd Lieut. Steve Mete 3230 Jennifer Drive Palmdale, CA 93550 (805) 273-3723 May 3, 1991 A Cilift War Re-enacitnent :Unit Lieutenant Dennis W. Warner Police Department City of San Jacinto 160 West 6th Street San Jacinto, CA 92383 Lieutenant Warner: NT VI\ 59t. \i/)::112:111=1, Unit 140 "1 ;LPanorama City, CA 91402 •11"; t(818) 893-5861 It is my understanding that Mr. Dan Wood, a resident of Hemet and a member of this club, has recently been in contact with you concerning a proposed memorial service at San Jacinto Cemetery, in honor of a Civil War veteran interred there who once was an officer in the Civil War unit we portray. I also understand from Mr. Wood that you offered to take up the matter with the San Jacinto City Council. Based on such understanding, I enclose the original of a letter to your Mayor and City Council, outlining our proposed ceremony and requesting all necessary approval therefor. I and the other members of our group will be obliged if you can present this "application" to the Mayor and City Council as soon as conveniently possible, so they may consider and act on it. If my understanding is incorrect, and you arc• unable or unwilling to deliver the enclosed "applicaiion," please return the letter immediately tu- Dan Wood, 608 S. State Street, Hemet, CA 92343, who will then have it delivered directly. Thanking you for your anticipateAf assistance- in pi-ocessing our request, I am, sir Your Obedient Servant, al4 DAN MUNSON Sergeant, Co. F, 55th Ohio V.I. Copies: Steve Mata, Cornmading Co. F Dan Wood 2nd Lieut. Steve Mata 3230 Jennifer Drive Palmdale, CA 93550 (805) 273-3723 May 3, 1991 The Honorable Francis Boykin Mayor, City of San Jacinto Clifford Rose Councilman, City of San Jacinto Dear Mayor Boykin and Councilpersons: :Sgt. Dan Munson ,,i9800 Vesper Ave., Unit 140 4 Panorama City, CA 91402 i;.(518) 893-5861 Henry Haflinger Councilman, City of San Jacinto Janet Leahy Councilwoman, City of San Jacinto On behalf of the members of our club, I hereby make formal application for permission for our group to hold a memorial service for a Civil War veteran of the actual 55th Ohio Infantry who is buried in the San Jacinto Cemetery. One of our members, Mr. Dan Wood, a resident of Hemet, has previously discussed this matter with both the cemetery's director and Lieut. Dennis Warner of your Police Department. Lieut. Warner has, I understand, agreed to present our application for your consideration. By way of brief introduction, our re-enactment unit is composed of about 30 men, most of whom have from five to fifteen years of experience in Civil War re-enacting. We are all regular participants of the monthly Civil War battle re-enactments performed at Fort Tejon State Historic Park and are all members of the Fort Tejon Historical Association (which Association, I should say, is not involved with our proposed memorial). Our "soldiers" are fully outfitted in authentic reproductions of the uniforms and accoutrements worn by infantrymen of Company F 55th Ohio, during Gen. William T. Sherman's 1864 Georgia Campaign. Our proposed memorial has its roots in the fact that we recently discovered that Captain Daniel S. Brown, once a commander of the real Company F, is interred amongst other former Union Army soldiers in San Jacinto Cemetery (having migrated to California around the turn of the century). Our proposed ceremony would entail an anticipated 20 of our members assembling at the cemetery and: 1) marching to Capt. Brown's gravesite, 2) rendering a "present arms" salute, 3) listening to a short history of the life and military service of Captain Brown, 4) comments by any City official(s) who might wish to make remarks, 5) laying of a wreath or flowers, 6) a fired salute (using, of course, blank charges). Unless there are extended remarks, I anticipate the entire ceremony would not run much longer than 30-45 minutes. The military procedures we would employ would conform as closely as practical to those set forth in Civil War -era Army Regulations. Thus we include, at the close, a fired salute of three volleys (although this can be reduced, if you deem it necessary). Unless you deem it inadvisable, we intend to send a "press release" concerning this event to a few local newspapers, such as the Hemet News and the Press Enterprise. Realistically, while they might draw a few on -lookers, I don't believe such advertising will result in any large crowds. Assuming you approve our proposed memorial, we propose t.o perform it on either Mayor and City Council City of San Jacinto May 3, 1991 Page 2 Saturday, May 18 or Monday, May 27 (observance of Memorial Day). While Memorial Day would obviously seem the more appropriate date, we are in the process of polling our members as to preference (a few, we already know, will be otherwise committed on Memorial Day weekend. Therefore, we ask that your approval --if forthcoming --be framed to include either of these two dates. Should you have questions or require further information, please feel free to contact the undersigned at the address and phone number on the letterhead. I can usually be reached at home, on weekdays, anytime after 6:30 p.m. In the alternative, you may contact: Dan Wood 608 S. State Street Hemet, CA 92343 (714) 652-0452 Please advise either Dan Wood or the undersigned, as soon as conveniently possible, whether this application is approved and what (if any) restrictions are placed on it. In addition, and assuming your approval, please advise whether any City dignitaries will wish to be present and/or offer some appropriate remarks. Thanking you for your kind attention to this request, I am, most respecfully, Your Servant, DAN MUNSON Sergeant, Co. F, 55th OVI Copies: Steve Mata, Commanding Co. F Dan Wood MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: May 2, 1991 SUBJ: RELEASE OF GRADING BONDS FOR TRACTS 23789, 23790, AND 23791 GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF EVANS STREET, WEST OF MOUNTAIN AVENUE, NORTH OF ESPLANADE AVENUE AND EAST OF HEWITT AVENUE. Friedman Homes has formally requested the release of the grading bonds for Tracts 23789, 23790, and 23791. The grading for the above tracts have been certified by an engineering firm. Staff therefore recommends the release of the grading bonds in full. Respectfully Submitted, Brian McNabb Director of Community Development FRIEDMAN HOMES TO BE FILED 11.1 GeV FebruarY 28, 1991 Engineering Department City of San Jacinto 201 E. Main street Ban Jacinto, CA 92383 RE: San Jacinto, Tracts 23769/90/91 Release of Bonds Dear Sire; Friedman Homes has completed all rough grading on the above mentioned tracts and a full bond release 14&13 requested in writing on November 16, 1990 I am following up on this request and would appreciate a response by March 3, 1991. If there is anymore information or material necessary to release this bond or you have any cuestions please call me at 714-987-1500, Trat -frtioq 23790 23791 Bond 9853635 9853900 !214,5335S Thank you for your help in this matter. 5incerclY,, 1.r Mike Bird Protect Manager MD/cm $182,7006, 70,800V 23 ,80Pre-- Inm7EAL-Ft.EL • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA_LITO&NIA 91730 ° TEL (714) 987-1.50..0 • FAX (714) 9R7-5298 f 141-1:Etr:f= f Ou: S-.1)0H MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance DirectorCW r" PA 2'11 DATE: May 2, 1991 SUBJECT: Cooperation Agreement for Pool Maintenance and Operation In the interest of providing the best service to our local citizenry, City Staff has asked Valley Wide Recreation and Park District to maintain and operate the City pool. Sam Goepp of Valley Wide has met with Staff and discussed what they can provide and what the City expects out of the Agreement. Therefore, the attached Agreement addresses those concerns which include: 1. City contributing $14,500 budgeted in 1990-91 Fiscal Year for operation and maintenance. 2. City will continue to pay existing utilities. 3. Valley Wide will hire staff and lifeguards, as required. 4. Valley Wide will maintain pool and concession area. This is the first year the City has contracted with Valley Wide for pool services. At the end of the pool operation (summer) Staff will report to Council on the outcome of the Agreement. Recommendation: The Agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney, Valley Wide District Manager and the City Manager. Therefore, Staff recommends that the City Council enter into Agreement with Valley Wide Recreation and Park District. nr 1 COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR POOL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION This agreement is executed this day of 1991 between the City of San Jacinto, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter "City") and Valley Wide Recreation and Park District (hereinafter "District"). WHEREAS, City is the owner of the swimming pool and surrounding grounds and buildings located at the Sallee Park in San Jacinto, California; and WHEREAS, District desires to operate said pool during the summer months as part of its overall program of recreation for the citizens within the District. In conjunction with this program, District intends to offer organized activities and swimming lessons at the pool in addition to other recreational uses of benefit to District. It is therefore agreed as follows: 1. For the period from June 1, 1991 through August 31, 1991, District shall administrate, operate and control the recreational uses of the above -referenced pool facility. The hours of operation shall he established within the discretion of the District, with the approval of the city Manager; however, the pool shall remain open a minimum of 32 hours per week. District shall hire, provide and supervise all staff, lifeguards or other personnel necessary to carry out the recreational functions of District. All lifeguards hired by District shall be trained or certified in accordance with California Health & Safety Code Sections 1797.182 and 24100.3. All such employees shall be the sole responsibility of District in the event of any claim for damac' under the Workers' Compensation law. 2. District shall provide all pool maintenance and care, including maintenance of the surrounding grounds and buildings which are part of the pool curtilage. The pool shall be maintained in a sanitary and healthful manner in accordance with Health & Safety Code Section 24101.2. District shall provide all pool maintenance equipment and pool supplies and chemicals necessary to accomplish this provision. District employees performing the functions listed in this paragraph shall be the sole responsibility of District in the event of any claim for benefits under the WorkersCompensation law. 3. District shall indemnify, defend and hold City, its elected officers, officials, agents and employees, harmless from all suits, claims, damages and awards for bodily injury, death, property damage, or any other claim arising fron the use, maintenance, administration or operation of the pool facility by Cr: District. District warrants that it is insured through CAPRI Insurance, a cooperative insurance authority of Recreational Districts, and that the liability limit is $5,000,000,00. City shall be named as an additional insured for the purpose of effecting this provision, and a certificate of such insurancP shall be provided to City. 4. As additional consideration for District's operation and maintenance of the pool, City shall pay to District the total sum of $14,500.00 payable in 3 equal monthly installments of $4,833.33 commencing June 1, 1991 (the last installment shall be $4,833.34). City shall further pay all utility expenses for water, power and gas, used in the operation of the pool. 5. District shall keep an account of all revenues generated in its operation of the pool, including but not limited to pool user fees and entry fees, refreshment or other concessions. District shall further keep an account of all expenses for pool operation, staffing and maintenance. As of the termination date of this agreement, should the amount of revenue exceed the amount of expenses, such excess amount shall be divided equally between City and District. District shall provide City with a report of the revenues and expenses within 30 days after the termination date of this agreement. CITY OF SAN JACINTO MAYOR VALLEY WIDE RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT By: -2- MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance Directorig/ DATE: May 2, 1991 SUBJECT: 1990-91 Audit Services The firm of Thomas, Byrne & Smith has audited the City and RDA for approximately nine years. The 1989-90 engagement for audit services cost $31,800. On April 1, request for proposals (RFP) were mailed to six firms for price and service comparison. Four of the six CPA firms responded with a proposal. The purpose of an audit from an independent firm is for review of the administrative control system in order to ensure compliance with laws and regulation. The audit firm will then prepare an: 1. Auditor's report on Internal Controls. 2. Auditor's report on Compliance with laws and regulations based on an Audit of General Purpose Financial Statement and Government Auditing Standards. 3. Report on Compliance with Specific Requirements applicable to major and non-maior Federal financial assistance program transactions. The comprehensive Annual Financial Report will also be prepared which encompasses all the funds 1 transactions, balances and addresses issues or explanations on footnotes. This report is then presented to Council for review and acceptance at the end of the audit period. The firms and quotes are as follows: Ernst & Young $45,000 Lund & Gutry $25,000 Thomas, Byrne & Smith $24,550 Conrad & Associates $23,970 1 1990-91 Audit Services Page 2 On May 2, the City Manager and Finance Director met with the low bidder, Mike Harrison, from Conrad & Associates. Staff also called other cities such as Hemet, Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage for references and background of Conrad & Associates. The responses were positive as to their qualifications and audit abilities of local governments. Sections G and H are attached for references on the scope of work and cost of service. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Conrad & Associates for audit services for the 1990-91 Fiscal Year. The agreement shall be for a period of three (3) years and it shall be reviewed annually. The agreement is attached for your review and approval. nr 2 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED SECTION G OUR FIRM'S UNDERSTANDING OF THE OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE ENGAGEMENT 0ur understanding of the objectives and scope of the work to be performed is based upon your request for proposal, our review of prior audit reports and Mike Harrison's meeting with Anna Vega at the City offices. Based upon the foregoing we understand the objectives and scope of work to be as follows: 1. We will perform an audit examination of all fund types and account groups of the City of San Jacinto for the years ended June 30, 1991, 1992 and 1993. We will prepare the general purpose financial statements and supplemental data of the City of San Jacinto. Our examination will be conducted in accordance with generally accepted governmental auditing standards. We will render our opinion on the general purpose financial statements and data of the City and provide twenty copies thereof by Octc'ber 31st of each year. 2. For fiscal years ending June 30, 1991, 1992 and 1993, we will perform a "single audit" of the City of San Jacinto in accordance with Public Law 98-502, "The Single Audit Act of 1984". Additionally, we will conduct our single audit in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A-128 (dated April 12, 1985) entitled Audits of State and Local Governments. Our single audit will cover all federal grants received by the City of San Jacinto either as a primary or secondary recipient. For fiscal 1991 and subsequent years, the significant nonmajor federal grant programs are anticipated to be the Title IIIB and the CDBG program. We will render auditors' reports on 1) the supplemental schedule of federal expenditures, 2) internal control structure matters in accordance with Government Auditing Standards, 3) upon internal controls (accounting and administrative) required by the Single Audit Act, 4) compliance with laws and regulations in accordance with Government Auditing Standards, 5) compliance with laws and regulations related to nonmajor Federal Financial Assistance Programs, and 6) on the General Purpose Financial Statements. We will provide 25 copies of the report and instructions for distribution of the single audit report by November 30th of each year. 3. We will perform a financial and compliance audit of the San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency for the years ending June 30, 1991, 1992 and 1993. Our compliance examination will be conducted in accordance with guidelines established from the State Controller's office. We will prepare 25 copies of the Agency financial statements, including financial and compliance opinions addressed to the Board by November 30 of each year. -46- f SECTION G. (Continued) 4. We will prepare State Controller's Reports for the City of San Jacinto and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto and issue those reports by September 30th and December 15th, respectively, of each year ended June 30, 1991, 1992 and 1993. 5. We will prepare a separate "housekeeping letter". This letter will include nonreportable conditions (those constructive comments not required to be included in the single audit report). We will discuss those comments with the Director of Finance and provide a final letter by November 30th of each year. 6. Conrad & Associates desires to keep its City clients abreast of new developments affecting local government finance. We would plan to advise City staff at least annually (perhaps a formal updating session would be in conjunction with review of management letter comments with City Staff). 7. Finally, we perceive the scope of our work as being advisors to the City of San Jacinto. Throughout the year, City personnel will have access to the Engagement Partner, Michael Harrison; Engagement Manager, Ken Al —Imam and Senior Auditor, David Christian, to seek advice in the application of generally accepted accounting principles, the establishment and segregation of funds, advise regarding debt issuance, financial statement preparation and content and other matters relating to the City, including matters of taxation and policy relating to City fringe benefits. Conrad & Associates meets the independence requirements of the Government Auditing Standards 1988 revision published by the U.S. General Accounting Office. Our firm has never had a record of substandard audit work. -47- COST OF SERVICES SECTION H OUR HOURLY RATES AND MAXIMUM FEE TO PERFORM THIS ENGAGEMENT We propose to complete the audit examinations as set forth in your request for proposal as follows: City of San Jacinto (including single audit): Portion Allocable to: General Fund Enterprise Funds (Water and Sewer) 1991 Amount $15,980 3,290 Estimated Hours 340 70 19,270 410 Financial and compliance audit of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto 4,700 100 Audit examination fees, including out of pocket expenses 23,970 510 Preparation of Annual Report of Financial Transactions (State Controller's Report): City of San Jacinto (due 9/30) 3,760 80 Redevelopment Agency (due 12/31) 1,128 24 Not to exceed fee, including out of pocket expenses $28,858 614 The above fees include reimbursement for all out of pocket expenses. For the years ending June 30, 1992 and 1993, we would agree to a 5% maximum cost of living increase over the previous year's audit fee. The above not to exceed fees contemplate conditions satisfactory to the completion of the examinations, including the City providing the auditors trial balances with substantially all closing entries completed and with the general ledger opening fund balances in agreement with the prior auditors' reports. We anticipate that the City would be able to have all fiscal agent analysis completed and entered into the general ledger and that fixed asset detail and depreciation would be completed by City staff. We also anticipate that the City will provide bank reconciliations and subsidiary detail of payables, receivables and other asset accounts. We also are planning that the City staff will type confirmation requests and pull supporting documentation for our staff. If there are substantial changes in the scope of the work (i.e., substantial additional debt issuances or substantial additional grant activity) we would like to discuss these changes with the City Finance Director and the affect of these changes on professional audit hours and costs of the engagement. -48- SECTION II, (CONTINUED Hourly rates in effect for 1991 for additional accounting or technical assistance that the City may request would be based upon the experience level of assistance requested as follows: Classification Hourly Rate Partner $95 Manager 90 Supervisor 65 Senior Auditor 55 Staff Auditor 46 The above rates include all reimbursement for out of pocket expenses. -49- AGREEMENT FOR AUDITING SERVICES This agreement is made and entered in the City of San Jacinto on this 7th day of May, 1991 by and between the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" AND CONRAD AND ASSOCIATES, Certified Public Accountants, hereinafter referred to as "AUDITORS". WITNESSETH WHEREAS, on April 1, 1991 CITY solicited proposals for independent audit services: WHEREAS, pursuant to said request for proposal, AUDITOR submitted a proposal which was accepted for said professional services: WHEREAS, AUDITORS are recognized as competent and qualified certified public accountants, duly authorized to practice and licensed as such by the California -State Board of Accountancy; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises, obligations and covenants hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. TERM. The term of this agreement shall be for a period of three consecutive years, beginning with the fiscal year ending June 30, 1991. City may at their option extend the term of this agreement for the fiscal year end June 30, 1994 and 1995 if Auditor and City mutually agree upon compensation for such services. 2. CITY'S OBLIGATIONS. For furnishing services specified in this agreement CITY will pay and AUDITOR shall receive in full compensation a total sum not to exceed $28,858 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1991. Fees for the fiscal years ending June 30, 1992 and 1993 shall not exceed a 5% cost of living increase over the previous years not to exceed fees. Payments to the AUDITOR shall be made within thirty (30) days after the receipt of invoices from the AUDITORS, which shall be prepared not more often than once per month. Special examinations, surveys, or detailed reports of any nature outside the scope of this agreement shall be billed separately by the AUDITORS at the hourly rates set forth in AUDITORS proposal response dated April 17, 1991 and must be authorized in advance of services being provided. 3. INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE. The Request for Proposal for Auditing Services and the proposal submitted by CONRAD AND ASSOCIATES dated April 17, 1991, are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this agreement. 4. AUDITORS' OBLIGATIONS. For and in consideration of payments and agreements hereinafter mentioned to be made and performed by CITY, AUDITOR agrees with CITY to furnish the services and to perform as required by this agreement and said specifications. yt 1 f� 5. INSURANCE. AUDITOR shall procure and/maintain for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by AUDITOR or AUDITORS' agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. 6. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION. AUDITOR agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless CITY, its officials, officers and employees from and against all claims, lawsuits, liabilities, or damages arising out of or in connection with, or relating to work performed by AUDITOR, his agents, employees and subcontractors. 7. AMENDMENTS. Any amendment, modification or variation from the terms of this agreement shall be in writing and shall be effective only upon approval by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto. 8. TERMINATION. If, during the term of this Agreement. CITY determines that AUDITOR is not faithfully abiding by any term or condition contained herein, CITY may notify AUDITOR in writing of such defect of failure to perform; which notice must give AUDITOR a 10 day notice of time to perform said work or cure the deficiency. If the AUDITOR has not performed the work or cured the deficiency within the ten days specified in the notice, such shall constitute a breach of this Agreement and CITY may terminate this agreement immediately by written notice to the AUDITOR to said effect. Thereafter, neither party shall have any further duties, obligations, responsibilities or rights under this agreement except, however, any and all obligations of AUDITORS' surety shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be extinguished or terminated. In said event, AUDITOR shall be entitled to the reasonable value of its services performed from the beginning of the period in which the breach occurs up to the day it received CITY'S Notice of Termination, minus any offset from such payment representing the CITY's damages from such breach. In no event, however shall AUDITOR be entitled to receive in excess of the compensation quoted in its proposal. 9. COMPLETE AGREEMENT. This written agreement, including the request for proposal dated April 1, 1991 and AUDITORS' response dated April 17, 1991 incorporated by reference, shall constitute the complete agreement between the parties hereto. 10. CONTRACT ASSIGNMENT. The AUDITOR shall not assign, transfer, convey or otherwise dispose of the contract, or its right title or interest to any individual or business entity without the previous written consent of the CITY. 11. ANTI -DISCRIMINATION. In the performance of the terms of this agreement, AUDITOR agrees that it will not engage in discrimination in employment of persons because of age, race, color, sex, national origin or ancestry or religion of such persons. Violation of this provision may result in the imposition of penalties referred to in Labor Code Section 1735. 12. NOTICE. All written notices to the parties hereto shall be sent by United States mail, postage prepaid by registered or certified mail addressed as follows: CITY AUDITOR Director of Finance City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, California 92383 Michael A. Harrison, Partner Conrad & Associates 1100 Main Street, Suite C Irvine, California 92714 13. NOTIFICATION. In the event an action is filed by either party to enforce any right under this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and court costs, in addition to any other relief granted by the Court. 14. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT. Both CITY and AUDITOR do covenant that each individual executing this agreement on behalf of each party is a person duly authorized and empowered to execute Agreements for such party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed the day and year first written above. CITY OF SAN JACINTO Francis Boykin Mayor ATTEST: Maurice Armstead City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: James Cox City Attorney CONRAD & ASSOCIATES Michael A. Harrison Partner MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DAI'E: May 2, 1991 SUBJ: RELEASE OF PERFORMANCE BOND FOR PARCEL MAP 23078 Maze Stone Ranchos, Inc. has formally requested the release of the Performance bond for Parcel Map 23078. This request is for the balance of $20,000. Staff recommends the bond in the amount of $20,000 for Tract 23078 be released. Respectfully Submitted, 171-542,11 Brian McNabb Director of Community Development P.O. BOX 8328 HEMET, CA 92343 714-925-4316 April 8, 1991 City of San Jacinto 201 E. Main St. San Jacinto, CA 92383 ATTN: BRIAN MCNABB RE: Esplanade & Commerce Ln. P.M. 23078 Dear Mr. McNabb, This letter is to request a release of the $20,000 balance on our Performance Bond on the above parcel map. The final requirement, street lights, has been met, and the electrician and Edison Co. have advised us that the 72-hour final check has been completed as of last. Friday, April 5, and that the City has inspected it. Please advise us what final steps will be necessary for the release of our Bond as soon as possible. Sincerely, ckaxd di6p(tx Richard L. Shirek in ;7,- Ill:74 T11 t,PR 1 0 1991 Tirnunity Deve!climent San Jacinto Police Department 160 West 6th Street San Jacinto, CA. 92383 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and Council Members via City Manager From: Chief of Police Date: May 1, 1991 Subject: Request for Funding for the "Operation Proud Return" Event on May 25, 1991 On May 25, 1991 the Cities of San Jacinto and Hemet will be co - hosting a parade, memorial ceremony and a picnic/entertainment event in honor of the men and women who served in "Operation Desert Storm." At this time we will also honor all the men and women who served in our armed forces in defense of our country. The event is scheduled to kick-off with a parade at 11:00 A.M. on State Street at Devonshire in Hemet and move north on State Street to Esplanade Avenue, then west on Esplanade Avenue to Valley Wide Parks District Headquarters. Between 1:00 and 2:00 P.M. a ceremony will take place remembering the men and women of "Operation Desert Storm" who so gallantly served their country. For those who gave their lives we will be having a four jet flyover in the missing man formation. After the memorial, a picnic and entertainment will be provided for all to enjoy. On the May 21st Council meeting details of the ry events will be provided for your information. Since the event needs advertising and some printing completed, Chief Chadwick and myself as co -chairpersons for the City, respectfully request the City authorize a $500 expenditure of funds to help with the printing costs. I understand the City of Hemet will match our funds should this request be authorized. If there are any questions, please feel free to contact either Chief Chadwick or myself. copy: Chief Chadwick MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DALE: May 3, 1991 SUBJ: Award of Contract for Professional Services to Appraise CFI) #2 When the decision was made to sell the bonds for both phases of CFD #2, it was conditioned that the funds for Phase II were to be put in escrow and not released for construction until certain: ^nP ?itiors were met 1. The value to tax lien ratio must be 2.25 times tne Phase II escrow proceeds. 2. Three hundred slabs must be poured. 3. The projected tax revenues shall be sufficient to pay the released bend proceeds. In order to see if the first condition is met, an appraisal of the entire CFI, is necessary. Also, an appraisal of the water tank site on Park Hill is required. James B. Harris, the person who is most familiar with CFD #2, as the original appraiser of the project has proposed to provide appraisal services for a price not to exceed $12,000 for Phase II and $10,000 for the water tank. Peacock Radaker will advance these funds until the second phase funds are reieased. Staff recommends that James B. Harris be authorized to perform the appraisal as outlined in his proposals Respectfully, 9-'-'797411 BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM:lr I EA I, I,.S`I' ATE ,.. 15100 13I1t011 STREET, SUITE 1 GO NI 1'O1tT DEACii. CAL1.100.RNIA 0.21.00 )71 4) 8 1 •1227 3aitl a:ry 28, 1991 City of San Jacinto P.G. Box 4B8 San Jacinto, California 92383 Attention: Ms. Pamel S. Faster City Manager Reference: Community Facility District No. 2 Phase II San Jacinto, California Gentlemen: At the request of Mr. Steve Peacock of Peacock-Radaker Equities, I am submitting this proposal for the appraisal of the above - referenced property. It is my understanding that the appraisal is to be used to assist the City of San Jacinto regarding the release of Phase II escrow proceeds of the existing Mello -Roes bond finan- cing. Although this release covers Phase II funds, an appraisal of the entire property is required. The appraisal will satisfy the requirement of Release Test I of the existing Mello -Roos bond financing agreement as stated below: Release Test I - Value to Tax Lien Ratio This test may be satisfied upon a showing that (a) the aggregate fair market value of all properties within the District, subject to the levy of the Special Taxes securing the Bonds, is equal to or exceeds three times the outstanding principal amount of the Bonds, and (b) the aggregate fair market value of all Phase II Properties, subject to the levy of the Special Taxes securing the Bonds ("Aggregate Phase II Property Values"), is equal to or exceeds 2.25 times the Phase II Escrow Proceeds. The fair market value of such properties shall be established by an appraisal conducted by an M.A.I. appraiser acceptable to and retained by the District, utilizing the methodology, or the equivalent thereof, used by Harris & Associates, Newport Beach, California. Bporaitijl AgrePmear City of San Jacinto Page Two I am prepared to undertake this assignment and provide you »it:`s r'o copies of the completed appraisal report within 45 days of my receipt of your signed authorization. This delivery first i m best estimate, and I agree to,be dig°agent and make eve ' d' . to meet it; however, it is not a guarantee, I have estimated my fee for this appraisal assignment to range between $10,000 and $12,000. However, due to the complexity of the appraisal assignment, this fee is an estimate only at this time_ I do guarantee that my tee will not exceed $12,000 foy the appraisal report. Because of the size of this assignment and time irame involved, I will require a retainer in the amount- of $6,000 before ley starting on this assignment. The report will by prepared in a narrative format t i'h ,e(w,Prr; a4..1 ,-__-a summaries: and analyees,Vand all appropriate valuation studies. The valuation studies will include discounted cash flow studies of the various residential product types. The value estimate will reflect the fee simple interest in the subject real estate as of the value date. No personal property, machinery or equipment or goodwill, if any, will be valued. The report will state the value of the prop- erty based on an "as is" analysis, assuming the CFD is in place; and assuming all of the lots are in a finished condition with the CFD in place. The report will be in conformity with the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute from which I hold the MAI designation. I agree to take no other employment inconsistent with this assignment. No one other than I shall form the analyses, conclusions, or opinions to be set forth in the appraisal report. With respect to data furnished by you, I shall not violate the confidential nature of our relationship by improperly disclosing any confidential information furnished to me, except as required by a court of law or by the Appraisal Institute to comply with its Bylaws and Regulations. No warranties, guarantees or assurances of any kind are expressed or implied, and I assume no liability in connection with this appraisal. The data gathered in the appraisal process (except data furnished by you) and the appraisal report prepared pursuant to this agreement will remain the property of Harris and Associates. No one other than you may rely upon or utilize the appraisal report without my express written consent. You agree that the appraisal report to be prepared pursuant to this agreement shall be privileged and shall not be quoted nor referred to in any report A•przNiEzdl Agreement City of San Jacinto Page Three :,or financial statement not in nny documents fil d with a ;tL)vern- mental agency without m prior w t r-ti: -Y Y p L .:pit en consent. No pqz ��c;t of ,:hG report, nor reference to the %opraisal Institute no?- fh MAT designation may be disseminated to the public through adveAfining media, public relations media, news media, sales media or any other public means of communication without my prior written consent. Standards Rule ("S.R.") 2-1 of the "Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice" of the Apora i Sal Institute requires appraiser to "clearly and accurately disclose anv extr.aor. Tanary assumption or limiting condition that directly affects anappralsal analysis, opinion, or conclusion." In compliance with S.R. 2-i and to assist the reader in interpreting' the report, tho following assumptions and limiting conditions will by included in tb ap4;rsisal report: ?. The term "Fair Market Value," as used in this ropor.t is defined as, "The fair market value of the property taken is the highest price on the date of valuation that would be agreed to by a seller, being willing to sell but under no particular or urgent necessity for so doing, nor obliged to sell, and a buyer, being ready, willing, and able to buy but under no particular necessity for so doing, each dealing with the other with full knowledge of all the uses and purposes for which the property is reasonably adaptable and available." (Section 1253.320 (a), California Code of Civil Procedure.) 2 The date of value to which the conclusions and opinions expressed in this report apply is set forth in the letter of transmittal. Further, that the dollar amount of and value opinion rendered in this report is based upon the purchasing power of the American dollar existing on that date. 3. The appraiser assumes no responsibility for economic or physical factors which may affect the opinions in this report which occur after the date of the letter trans- mitting this report. 4. The intormation furnished by others is believed to be reliable. However, no warranty is given for its accuracy. 5. The appraiser reserves the right to make such adjustments to the analyses, opinions and conclusions set forth in this report as may be required by consideration of additional data or more reliable data that may become available. ppraisal Agreement City of San Jacinto Page Four 6 No opinion as to title is rendered. Data related to ownership and legal description wa`.i obtained from sources considered reliable. Titla is assumed to T tahq and Iree and clear of all liens and emir lT ;rl t�ti-J.,. u !: [act s, easements and restrictions, Except those specifically discussed in the report. The property is appraised assuming it to be under responsible. ownership and competent management and available for its highest and best use. The appraiser assumes no responsibility ac,r hidden z unapparent conditions of the property, :subsoil, or structures that render it more or less valuable. ;n responsibility is assumed for arranging for engineering studies that may be required t :l� c,U ,•. , r 8 The property is appraised assuming it to be in full com- pliance with all applicable federal, etata, and local environmental regulations and laws, unlrasa otherwise stated. 9. No engineering survey has been made by the appraiser_. Except as specifically stated, data relative to size and area was taken from sources considered reliable, and no encroachment of real property improvements is considered to exist. 10. No opinion is expressed as to the value of subsurface oil, gas or mineral rights or whether the property is subject to surface entry for the exploration or removal of such materials except as is expressly stated. 11. I have inspected, as far as possible by observation, the land; however, it was impossible to personally inspect conditions beneath the soil. No soils report was made available for examination by your appraiser. For pur- poses of this appraisal, it is assumed that the soil is free of contamination and will allow the use of the property to be developed to its highest and best use; however, no representations are made as to these matters. 12. Since earthquakes are not uncommon in this area, no re- sponsibility is assumed due to their possible effect on individual properties, unless detailed geologic reports are made available. The cost and availability of financing help determine the demand for and supply of real estate and therefore aff8ot ApPraiaLl Agreemeut City of San Jacinto Page Five real estate values and prices. The traits r; ion rr i'..ce3 of one property may differ from �ij �' .:. =il that CY an i4ti1r:.C•= property because financing arrangements vary. 14. Maps, plats, and exhibits included herein are for illus- tration only as an aid in visualizing matters discussed within the report. They should not be considered as surveys or relied upon for any other purpose, nor should they be removed from, reproduced, or used :9pu'ft fic,m this report. 15. No opinion is intended to be expressed for matte; r; -`h is:h require legal expertise or specialized investi 3tion cr knowledge beyond that customarily employed by ,appraisers, 16. The distribution, if any, of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the stated program of utilization. The separate alloca- tions for land and buildings must not be used in conjunc- tion with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. 17. Testimony or attendance in court or at any other hearing is not required by reason of rendering this appraisal, unless arrangements for such additional employment are made a reasonable tine in advance. 18 That possession of this report, or a copy of it, does not carry with it the right of publication. It may not be used for any purpose by any person other than the party to whom it is addressed without the written consent of the appraiser, and in any event only with proper written qualification and only in its entirety. In particular, it may not be referred to in any report or financial statement or in any documents filed with a governmental agency without prior written consent of the appraiser. 19. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous substances, including without limitation asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum leakage, or agriculWral chemicals, which may or may not be present on the property, or other environmental condi- tions, were not called to the attention of nor did the appraiser become aware of such during this appraiser's inspection. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property unless otherwise stated. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to test such substances or conditions. If the presence of such substances, such as esbentos, urea &praisaJ Agi€yillg_il_ City of San Jacinto Page Six formaldehyde, foam Insulation, or other hazardous substances or environmental conditions gr?:y affect th r. value of the property, the value estimated P,t S i predicated on the assumption that there is no such condition un or in the property or in such proximity thereto that it would cause a loss in value, uo responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, nor for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The client is urged to retain an exert in the field of environmental impacts upon real estate if so desired. If I find it necessary to make additional assumptions r l notify you in writing. I warrant' and represent to you that 11 have .:o preeent or ,,;,-o.l+s,m - .jlat.d. lu .1r_. i__., resit -? . t}�e. rc.zl .-.a._ t ti i .• � -..:,_ �%:+i-ii�c - „ate iS Lilo subject vt this assignment and that I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the subject of this assignment or the parties involved. Both you and I agree that I may, but need not, assume the accuracy of all materials with which you furnish me. This proposal, or the acceptance of this proposal, is not contin- gent upon, or related to, any anticipated value conclusions, My appraisal fee will have been earned in full upon delivery of the completed appraisal report. Report revision or amendment, other than those required due to my error, shall be prepared at my then current hourly rate in addition to the original fee. Any addi- tional copies of the completed report, other than the two copies currently agreed upon, shall be made available at an additional cost of $150.00 per copy. It is agreed that the fee charged for services performed by ma is guaranteed by you. All payments due me, under this Agreement, shall bear interest at the published prime landing rate from Bank of America, commencing thirty (30) days after such payments are due but not in excess of the maximum rate permitted under California law. In the event that any payment is not paid when due, you shall pay all expenses of collection, including, but not limited to, court costs and attorneys' fees. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. If for any reason you wish to cancel this Agreement, you shall do so in writing. You agree to compensate me for the time I have spent on the assignment prior to the date I receive such notifi- cation at my current hourly rate. The retainer will be applied t this sum. Any additional amounts will be due upon your re:-e+pt of my statement, and I will immediately refund any amount by which the retainer exceeds th1_a r.un. City of San Jacinto Page Seven vc,u opportunity to present this proposal for your ccnIcleratIon. The terms and conditions of thia Agreement ahall vellid for a thi;:is.y-day pe-rioU, fro the dateoi LhiP. letter. If the proposal meets with your approval, pleafie execute and rotu-n one signed original. I will acknowledge receipt of the retainer and then commence work. Sincerely, 27, t•-"" _ies B. Parris. .1-TAI iS1ikTreem,ent huthorlzeltio,1 I hereby agree to the terms and conditions of thin Appraisal Agreement, detailed on the preceding seven pages, as submitted by Harris and Associates. Signature Title Date flARRIS AND ASSOCIATES REAL EEETATV7 APPRAISERS AND CONSULTANTS 6100 BIRCII STREET, HIJIT1i 100 NEWPORT U19ACI1, CALIFORNIA 02000 (7l4) A61.1 227 February 28, 1991 City of San Jacinto P.O. Box 488 San Jacinto, California 92383 Attention: Ms. Pamela S. Easter City Manager Reference: Community Facility District No. 2 Park Hill water Tank Site San Jacinto, California Gentlemen: At the request of Mr. Steve Peacock of Peacock-Radaker Equities, t am submitting this proposal for the appraisal of the above - referenced property. It is my understanding that the appraisal Is to be used to assist the Community Facility District No. 2 in acquiring a water tank site in the Park Hill area. As I discussed with Mr. Peacock, this appraisal assignment is com- plicated and will require complex analyses to arrive at a supportable conclusion. Basically, because of the City's right of condemnation, this appraisal has to address all the aspects of the State's Eminent Domain Code. State condemnation law requires valuation of three components. The first is the value of the "larger parcel." Second is valuation of the "part taken." Third is valuation of any "net damage to the remainder." Two separate valuation and highest and best use analyses are required to complete this appraisal. If testimony, deposition, or attendance at a governmental mr admin- istrative proceeding is required, I agree to attend, provided you furnish me with reasonable notice. You agree to compensate me for the time I spend in this regard at my hourly rate in effect at that time. Currently, my hourly rate is $175.00 per hour. Compensable time will include, but not be limited to, the time spent updating or revising the completed appraisal, in preparing for the proceed- ing, in meeting with you and/or your clients in regard to the pro- ceeding, in testifying or waiting to testify (at the location of the proceeding), and traveling to and from my office and the proceeding or meeting with you and/or your clients, This compensation will be in addition to the fee for the appraisal report. Such advance payment shall be based upon a written estimate submitted to you by me within a reasonable time after being subpoenaed or informed of my attendance at the proceeding and AVpraal Asaiggme�t City of San Jacinto Page Two shall be due upon receipt. If the estimate is too low, r shall submit a statement for additional fees at the conclusion of the proceeding. If the estimate is too high, I shall refund the balance at the conclusion of the hearing. I am prepared to undertake this assignment and provide you with two copies of the completed appraisal report within 4.5 days of my receipt of your signed authorization. This delivery date is my best estimate, and I agree to be diligent and make every effort to meet it; however, it is not a guarantee. I have estimated my fee for this appraisal assignment to range between $8,000 and $10,000. However, due to the complexity of the appraisal assignment, this fee is an estimate only at this time. I do guarantee that my fee will not exceed $10,000 for the appcaisa1 report, Rer?u©e of the size of this assignment and +-he time frame involved, I 'dill require a retainer in ne amount of $4,000 before my starting on this assignment. The report will be prepared in a narrative format which will include property and area descriptive information, market data summaries and analyses, and all appropriate valuation studies. The valuation studies will include discounted cash flow studies of the various residential product types. The value estimate will reflect the fee simple interest in the subject real estate as of the value date. No personal property, machinery or equipment or goodwill, if any, will be valued. The report will state the value of the prop- erty based on an "as is" analysis, assuming the CFD is in place; and assuming all of the lots are in a finished condition with the CFD in place. The report will be in conformity with the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute from which I hold the MAI designation. I agree to take no other employment inconsistent with this assignment. No one other than I shall form the analyses, conclusions, or opinions to be set forth in the appraisal report. With respect to data furnished by you, I shall not violate the confidential nature of our relationship by improperly disclosing any confidential information furnished to me, except as required by a court of law or by the Appraisal Institute to comply with its Bylaws and Regulations. No warranties, guarantees or assurances of any kind are expressed or implied, and I assume no liability in connection with this appraisal. The data gathered in the appraisal process (except data furnished by you) and the appraisal report prepared pursuant to this agreement will remain the property of Harris and Associates. No SS:ST 1661'2t_,'S0 Appraisaj assignment City of San Jacinto Page 3 one other than you may rely upon or utilize the appraisal report without my express written consent. You agree that the appraisal report to be prepared pursuant to this agreement shall be privileged and shall not be quoted nor referred to in any report nor financial statement nor in any documents filed with a govern- mental agency without my prior written consent. No portion of the report, nor reference to the Appraisal Institute nor the MAI designation may be disseminated to the public through advertising media, public relations media, news media, sales media or any other public means of communication without my prior written consent. Standards Rule ("S.R.") 2-1 of the "Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice" of the Appraisal Institute requires the appraiser to "clearly and accurately disclose any extraordinary assumption or limiting condition that directly affects an appraisal analysis, opinion, or conclusion." In compliance with S.R: 2-1 anr3. to assist the reader in interpreting the report, the following assumptions and limiting conditions will be included in the appraisal report: 1. The term "Fair Market Value," as used in this report is defined as, "The fair market value of the property taken is the highest price on the date of valuation that would be agreed to by a seller, being willing to sell but under no particular or urgent necessity for so doing, nor obliged to sell, and a buyer, being ready, willing, and able to buy but under no particular necessity for so doing, each dealing with the other with full knowledge of all the uses and purposes for which the property is reasonably adaptable and available." (Section 1263.320 (a), California Code of Civil Procedure.) 2. The date of value to which the conclusions and opinions expressed in this report apply is set forth in the letter of transmittal. Further, that the dollar amount of any value opinion rendered in this report is based upon the purchasing power of the American dollar existing on that date. 3. The appraiser assumes no responsibility for economic or physical factors which may affect the opinions in this report which occur after the date of the letter trans- mitting this report. 4. The information furnished by others is believed to be reliable. However, no warranty is given for its accuracy. .Appraig4.1 Agreement city of San Jacinto Page Four The appraiser reserves the right to make such adjustments to the analyses, opinions and conclusions set forth in this report as may be required by consideration of additional data or more reliable data that may become available. 6. No opinion as to title is rendered. Data related to ownership and legal description was obtained from sources considered reliable. Title is assumed to be marketable and free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, easements and restrictions, except those specifically discussed in the report. The property is appraised assuming it to be under responsible ownership and competent management and available for its highest and best use. 7. The appraiser assumes no responsibility for hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures that render it more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed for arranging for engineering studies that may be required to discover them. 8. The property is appraised assuming it to be in full com- pliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws, unless otherwise stated. 9. No engineering survey has been made by the appraiser. Except as specifically stated, data relative to size and area was taken from sources considered reliable, and no encroachment of real property improvements is considered to exist. 10. No opinion is expressed as to the value of subsurface oil, gas or mineral rights or whether the property is subject to surface entry for the exploration or removal of such materials except as is expressly stated. 11. I have inspected, as far as possible by observation, the land; however, it was impossible to personally inspect conditions beneath the soil. No soils report was made available for examination by your appraiser. For pur- poses of this appraisal, it is assumed that the soil is free of contamination and will allow the use of the property to be developed to its highest and best use; however, no representations are made as to these matters. AP gat City of San Jacinto Page Five 12. Since earthquakes are not uncommon in the area, no re- sponsibility is assumed due to their possible effect on individual properties, unless detailed geologic reports are made available. 13, The cost and availability of financing help determine the demand for and supply of real estate and therefore affect real estate values and prices. The transaction prices of one property may differ from that of an identical property because financing arrangements vary. 14. Maps, plats, and exhibits included herein are for illus- tration only as an aid in visualizing matters discussed within the report. They should not be considered as surveys or relied upon for any other purpose, nor should -hey he removed from, reproduced, or used apart from this• ^_port. 15. No opinion is intended to be expressed for matters which require legal expertise or specialized investigation or knowledge beyond that customarily, employed by real estate appraisers. 16. The distribution, if any, of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the stated program of utilization. The separate alloca- tions for land and buildings must not be used in conjunc- tion with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. 17. Testimony or attendance in court or at any other hearing is not required by reason of rendering this appraisal, unless arrangements for such additional employment are made a reasonable time in advance. 18, That possession of this report, or a copy of it, does not carry with it the right of publication. It may not be used for any purpose by any person other than the party to whom it is addressed without the written consent of the appraiser, and in any event only with proper written qualification and only in its entirety. In particular, it may not be referred to in any report or financial statement or in any documents filed with a governmental agency without prior written consent of the appraiser. 19. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous substances, including without limitation asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum leakage, or agricultural chemicals, which may or may not be >T I E. '<'iI ;L a City of San Jacinto Page S present on the property, or other environmental condi- tions, were not called to the attention of nor did the appraiser become aware of such during this appraiser's inspection. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property unless otherwise stated. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to test such substances or conditions. If the presence of such substances, such as asbestos, urea formaldehyde, foam insulation, or other hazardous substances or environmental conditions may affect the value of the property, the value estimated is predicated on the assumption that there is no such condition on or in the property or in such proximity thereto that it would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, nor for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them, Thn client is urged to retain an expert in the field oZ environmental impacts upon real estate if so desired. If I find it necessary to make additional assumptions, I will notify you in writing. I warrant and represent to you that I have no present or contem- plated future interest in the real estate that is the subject of this assignment and that I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the subject of this assignment or the parties involved. Both you and I agree that I may, but need not, assume the accuracy of all materials with which you furnish me. This proposal, or the acceptance of this proposal, is not contin- gent upon, or related to, any anticipated value conclusions. My appraisal fee will have been earned in full upon delivery of the completed appraisal report. Report revision or amendment, other than those required due to my error, shall be prepared at my then current hourly rate in addition to the original fee. Any addi- tional copies of the completed report, other than the two copies currently agreed upon, shall be made available at an additional cost of $150.00 per copy. It is agreed that the fee charged for services performed by me is guaranteed by you. All payments due me, under this Agreement, shall bear interest at the published prime lending rate from Bank of America, commencing thirty (30) days after such payments are due but not in excess of the maximum rate permitted under California law. In the event that any payment is not paid when due, you shall pay all expenses of collection, including, but not limited to, court costs and 'attorneys' fees. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. city of San Page Seven If for any reason you wish to cancel this Agreement, you shall do so in writing. You agree to compensate me for the time I have spent on the assignment prior to the date I receive such notifi- cation at my current hourly rate. The retainer will be applied to this sum. Any additional amounts will be due upon your receipt of my statement, and I will immediately refund any amount by which the retainer exceeds this sum. Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal for your consideration. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall remain valid for a thirty -day period, from the date of this letter. If the proposal meets with your approval, please execute and return one signed original. I will acknowledge receipt of the retainer and then commence work. Sincerely, ames B. Harris, MAI ation I hereby agree to the terms and conditions of this Appraisal Agreement, detailed on the preceding seven pages, as submitted by Harris and Associates. Signature Title Date MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: May 3, 1991 SUBJ: Community Facilities District #3, Annexation #2 As you know, CFD #3 is a special tax placed on new development to help mitigate the impacts on public safety. Annexation #2 incorporates a number of developments that are either currently under construction or are pending. Resolution 1956 sets the boundaries for the annexation. Resolution 1957 declares the Council intent and sets the public hearing. Also on the agenda is the contract with Brown, Harper, Burns, & Hentschke to provide legal services for this annexation. Staff recommends adoption of Resolutions 1956 and 1957 and authorization to execute the contract with the law firm. BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM:lr 2 3 5 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2- 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. 1956 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING BOUNDARY MAP SHOWING TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT THIS RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED WITH REFERENCE TO THE FOLLOWING FACTS: WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative ,body of the local Agency"), desires to annex territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provi- sions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof. The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and, WHEREAS, there has been submitted a map showing the territory proposed to be annexed to the existing Community Facilities District, said area to be designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3, ANNEXATION NO. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "annexed territory"). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by tne C:.ty Council of the City of San Jacinto, in regular session, this 7th day of May, 1991, as follows: 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. 2. That the map showing the property, parcels and territory proposed to be annexed to an existing Community Facilities District and to be subject to a special tax to be levied is hereby approved and adopted. Said map is designated by the name of the existing District and the number of the proposed annexation. 3. A certificate shall be endorsed on the original and on at least one (1) copy of the map of the District, evidencing the date and adoption of this Resolution, and within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of the Resolution fixing the time and place of the hearing on the intention to annex or extent of the annexation to said District, a copy of said map shall be filed with the correct and proper endorsements thereon with the County Recorder, all in the manner and form provided for in Section 3111 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED AT A REGULAR MEETING OF SAID CITY COUNCIL duly held the 7th day of May, 1991. ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk Mayor CERTIFICATE The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of a Resolution duly adopted by said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date therein set forth. 3 ATTEST: 5 Deputy City Clerk 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 SHEET C,T =ECORDE','S ANNEXATION NO. 2 TO CITY OF SAN JACINTO BCcr COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 Fh:0J7:ES :STRICT 4iLLIAm E CONERL,. AS FILED IN BOOK NO. 26 PAGE 21 „ COuNTT REC7,RDE4 CfPuTY AS DOCUMENT NO. 7072 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COTTD AREA (TR NO. 24738) 7TH ESP COMMONWEALTH FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CfTY CLERK OF THE CfTY OF SAN JACINTO, THIS DAY OF 1990. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN MAP SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF ANNEXATION NO. TO COMMUNfTY FACILITES DISTRICT NO. 3 CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE DAY OF 1990. BY rrs RESOLUTION NO CITY CLERK OF THE crrY OF SAN JACINTO tiCT TO SCALE CU DT CN R AREA 3 :TENT. TR ND 254141 BRGN ST. AREA 6 (TENT TR NO 83190) AREA 4 , AAEA • .ENrN+Z .1 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 19 RUBLJC WORKS DIRECTOR, CfTY OF SAN JACINTO APPROVED BY: DATE: ACTING CITY ENGINEER - CfTY OF SAN JACINTO R.C.E. NO. 9212 12-31-92 ANNEXATION NO. 2 TO CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 AS FILED IN BOOK NO. 26 PAGE 21 AS DOCUMENT NO. 7072 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AREA NO. 1 cC OA /wow COT MS 4.'S I/917 NOVIr.50- W /6400' N.9.9'4790'E .446' N OG• 14'55'e /Z044' 27•534GT /215.00. NG7'00'1414, 5.00' N.72'.55'44-5 IXt00* 474CW.4 e es WAY r.:04 ••••• vzrs-cect /coca. NG7•00/4.55 74.W, N ZZ' 55'46•G GO 0,, A/05' .5i• riaoo• NAT' Zr031v N46•47'11"tr 100.00' N.1577Veg, 8507' N4.6.42'12.*E I 75.00' \N404772? Z.140' SHEET 2 CF 5 I • 50' TR" 22(182 -2 TR'. 22582 Mar 4V/f"( SHEET 3 Os 6 ANNEXATION NO. 2 TO CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 AS FILED IN BOOK NO. 26 PAGE 21 AS DOCUMENT NO. 7072 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AREA NO. 2 113 33 C't Lk, '3 `‘`• \-S1 Lis co7r0/vw000 dve"./GE Sel.P 545,5 2444.56.' :4 69• SO W 2445 55 V 5N 7- e/ S 69'$444'5 /52./.67 cd• CO; • sr.reer ANNEXATION NO. 2 TO CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 AS FILED IN BOOK NO. 26 PAGE 21 AS DOCUMENT NO. 7072 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AREA NO. 4 spA ve,e- srer A/ 89'52' 33' - /09244' .102.17' 290 TR. 26020-1 11.949'..17•IV- 461 44• tLJ EVANS d • 1.9.70'14') 0 -r- TR. 2ao2o-2 /0,4Z /2' - /544.5C' SHEET 5 CF 5C.dLe N • ,50. t 2 ,5 • S7A-EE 11 SHEET e OF ANNEXATION NO. 2 TO CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 AS FILED IN BOOK NO. 26 PAGE 21 AS DOCUMENT NO. 7072 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AREA NO. 5 lJ sevem TH 5TET Ner$ 55 29 W — 629. /2' 6950'3414 /- &GZ.07' 7.55000.1 --- L...524)."7.5. ,v4.9*5e•r2w - ANNEXATION NO. 2 TO CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 AS FILED IN BOOK NO. 26 PAGE 21 AS DOCUMENT NO. 7072 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AREA NO. 6 ANNEXATION NO. 2 TO CITY OF SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 AS FILED IN BOOK NO. 26 PAGE 21 AS DOCUMENT NO. 7072 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AREA NO. 7 7 711 STPEET A/ 66* 45' 4/"G' /350.60' 5,8E7 8 Cc 8 SCALC I. Iso' 7, 24216 -/ 7,.e. 04 2 /G, 467 7-1-' E SA/LIVER 15/66•473Z°6 — /0,3.10 srReer '0 SZ.1. 1-, 4,„ 2 6 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. 1957 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT THIS RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED WITH REFERENCE TO THE FOLLOWING FACTS: WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), at this time is desirous to annex territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof. The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 (hereinafter referred to ae the "District"); and, WHEREAS, the area proposed to be annexed shall be known and designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3, ANNEXATION NO. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "annexed territory"). WHEREAS, this legislative body Le now desirous to proceed to adopt its Resolution of Intention to annex territory to the existing District, to describe the territory included within the existing District and the territory proposed for annexation, to specify the services to be provided, to set and specify the special taxes that would be levied within the territory proposed to be annexed, and to set a time and place for a public hearing relating to the annexation of territory to said District; and, WHEREAS, a map showing the territory to be annexed has been submitted, which said map is hereby approved and a copy of said map shall be kept on file with the transcript of these proceedings. NOW, THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, in regular session, this 7th day of May, 1991, as follows: That the above recitals are all true and correct. That these proceedings for annexation are initiated by this legislative body pursuant to the authorization of Section 53339.2 of the Government Code of the State of California. That this legislative body hereby determines that the public convenience and necessity requires that certain territory be added to the existing District and this legis- lative body declares its intention to annex said territory to the existing Community Facilities District, and a description of the boundaries and territory proposed to be annexed is as follows: All that property and territory proposed to be annexed to the existing Community Facilities District, as said property is shown on a map as previously approved by this legislative body, said map designated by the number of the annexation and the name of the existing Community Facili- ties District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and shall remain open for public inspection. 2 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 4. A general description of the territory included in the existing District is hereinafter described as follows: All that property and territory as previously included within the original Community Facilities District, as said property was shown on a map as approved by this legislative body designated by the name of the original existing Commu- nity Facilities District, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, as well as a copy being on file in the Office of the County Recorder. 5. The name of the proposed annexation shall be known and designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3, ANNEXATION NO. 2. 6. That the types of public services provided in the existing District are generally described as set forth below, and no additional services are to be provided in the annexed terri- tory and the existing services for the existing District will serve the properties within the annexed territory. A general description of the services authorized in the exist- ing District is set forth as follows: Additional police and fire services necessary and required to meet increased demands within the boundaries of the District. 7. It is the intention of this legislative body that, except where funds are otherwise available, a special tax suffi- cient to pay for said services to be provided in the annexed territory, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the annexed territory, will be levied annually within the boundaries of the annexed territory. For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit "A", which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment to allow each landowner or resident within the annexed territory to clearly estimate the maximum amount that said person will have to pay on said special tax. 21 8. 22 23 24 25 9. 26 27 28 10. 29 30 31 32 The proposed special taxes shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency as applicable for ad valorem taxer: however, as applicable, this legislative body may establis`; and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. This legislative body hereby determines that parcels owned by regulated public utilities and in use in the providing of telephone service, water, electricity, gas or other means of heat, illumination, power or any other public service, shall be exempt from the special tax. NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT ON THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 1991, AT THE HOUR OF 7:30 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD WHERE THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY WILL CONSIDER THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, THE PROPOSED .METHOD AND APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX TO BE LEVIED WITHIN SAID PROPOSED ANNEXED TERRITORY, AND ALL OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH IN THIS RESOLUTION OF INTENTION. THAT AT THE ABOVE -MENTIONED TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING, 3 6 7 a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hat notice of the time and place of the public hearing shall be given by the City Clerk in the following manner: A. A Notice of Public Hearing shall be published in the legally designated newspaper of general circulation, being the HEMET NEWS, said publication pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code, with said publica- tion to be completed at least seven (7) days prior to the date set for the public hearing. B. A Notice of Public Hearing shall be mailed, postage 13 prepaid, to each property owner within the boundaries of the area proposed for annexation; said mailing to 14 the property owners shall be to the address as shown on the last equalized assessment roll. Said mailing shall 15 be completed at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date set for the public hearing. 16 12. All environmental evaluation proceedings relating to the 17 annexation of territory to the existing District shall be completed prior to the date and time set for the public 18 hearing. 19 13. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 2 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED AT A REGULAR MEETING OF SAID CITY COUNCIL duly held the 7th day of May, 1991. ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk Mayor CERTIFICATE The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of a Resolution duly adopted by said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date therein set forth. ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk CITY OF SAN JACINTO 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 COMMUNITY. FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 ANNEXATION NO. 2 EXHIBIT "A" RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX The Resolution of Intention refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and apportionment of the special tax so as to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed district to estimate the maximum annual amount that would be required for payment. For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment, see the following: PROPERTY CATEGORIES AND MAXIMUM ANNUAL TAX Taxable property categories and initial maximum annual taxes are as follows: MAXIMUM ANNUAL TAX PROPERTY CATEGORY (FISCAL YEAR 1989-90) RESIDENTIAL UNIT $96.40 per dwelling unit I2. COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL $0.05 per square foot per year for developed area RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL taxes shall be levied on all property upon the issuance of a building permit in the fiscal year next following the issuance of the building permit. ESCALATION OF TAX The above authorized taxes for are for fiscal year 1989-90, and are subject to annual increases to reflect increases in the Consumer Price Index. TERM The Final Land Use Residential Tax shall be levied as long as necessary to pay for additional services. 22 DEFINITIONS 23 The "Consumer Price Index" shall be the Los Angeles/Riverside Area - All Urban Consumer Price Index, published by the United 24 States Bureau of Labor Statistics, as said data is available June 30th of each fiscal year. 25 "Developed Area" shall be that portion of the land to be 26 developed as measured from outside walls, excluding garage, covered ways and overhangs, patios and additions. 27 "Dwelling Unit" shall mean any building and any mobilehome which 28 is not immediately transportable or any portion thereof which contains living facilities, including provisions for sleeping, 29 eating, cooking and sanitation. 30 "Fiscal Year" shall be July 1 through June 30 of any year. 31 * * * 32 For all particulars relating to implementation, further interpre- tation, definitions, and all other particulars related to the method and apportionment of the tax, reference is made to the "Report" as previously approved by this legislative body. ~ rw^cxsmz/sBROWN' ^LAw e.nuoms Ju°° euaspr°°npse^ o^".sL S. *sw,sc"vs poasprE. °csssu OF COUNSEL Jussp° J. *us°cs "/c°^aa."o"roowsp.^ ,,=,ES,1O"~,==~AT'°, April ]O, 1991 Brian McNabb, Director Community Development City of oau Jacinto P. o' Boo 488 sau Jacinto, ca 92383 LAW OFFICES BROWN, H/\RP6R, BURNS 8 H6NTSCHK6 os/ oo°s STREET. su/rs /ao msWpmrBEACH. CALIFORNIA y26n /r.°' ss/-/P/s FAX +rs'/y.s RE: comMomzzr rAczLzzzEa ozazRzcz NO. 3 ANNEXATION NO. 2 Dear Brian: s°m o'sao (e/s) ^ss-m/s `os °"oc`cs uo/sup/e.s This letter will act as a proposal and agreement to provide legal services to the cityiu connection with the proceedings for ammEXAzzmx NO. 2 to a Community Facili- ties District known and designated as ^czzz or oam JAozmzo, coaMomzzz raczLzzzEo ozoznzcz NO. ]^ (the "District"). The services under this Agreement shall generally be the following: I. Preparation of all necessary Resolutions, Ordinances, notices and other papers and documents required in the proceedings; 2. Examination of the proceedings, step by step as taken; 3. appear at the hearing required under the proceedings, and attend any meeting where such attendance is required; 4. Review the "Report" of the Public Works Director as it relates to the proceed- ings for the annexation; 5' Review and examine the map showing the area and boundaries of the territory to be annexed; 6, aaoiot in the election administration, as necessary and/or requested by the City; 7, Instruction and advice in connection with any of the foregoing/ 8, Any and all other customary services relating to the annexation proceedings for the original oiotrict' Counsel shall be paid a flat fee of $l,Ooo'oo, for services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, such sum due and payable upon the certification of the election reaulto' In the event the proceedings are terminated or abandoned prior to the election, counsel shall be paid a reasonable fee for services rendered to date. ~ LAW orr.csS BROWN, HARPER, BURNS 8 HENTSCHKE Brian McNabb City of San Jacinto April 30, 1991 Page Two Counsel shall pay all ordinary out-of-pocket expenses incurred, including travel, telephone and copying eopensea� The city may be billed by Counsel for overnight delivery services and/or messenger services. The city agrees to furnish counsel with reports and other documents prepared by the City as they are available and required by Counsel in the performance of our services. This agreement may be terminated by either party hereto by mailing written notice of such termination to the other pazty' Upon acceptance of this proposal and agreement by the city, it is requested that a copy be executed in the space provided below and returned to tbis off�oe. We look forward to working with the City and staff on the annexation proceedings. rmo;bd agenonoo or THE CITY coomczL or THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO THIS DAY OF , 1991. CITY OF SAN JACINTO TREASURER'S OFFICE TIME DEPOSIT REGISTER Bank & Acct, No. Issued Maturity. Rate Amt. Inv. Int. this Mo. State of California 9833794 02-20-85 Open 7.970 6,191,000. 82,171.34 Red. 5133120 01-19-88 Open 7.970 1,698,000. 29,795.16 Great Western 389-606357-9 TRANSFERRFD TC, TAIF 993.61 Far West Savings 013-10432-8 TRANSFERRED TO LAIF 322.59 Red. 013-14016-5 TRANSFERRED TO LAIF 322.59 013-16299-5 TRANSFERRED TO LAIF 310.33 Total Invested $7,889,000. $ 113,915.62 April 1991 Register Federal I.D. No. 95-6000780 CITY OF SAN JACINTO TREASURER'S OFFICE TIME DEPOSIT IlEGZS]CE8 CZ\7ZC CENTER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FUNDS Bunk & Acct. No. Issued Maturity Rate Amt, Inv. Int. this Mo. Great Western Buo� - 389-606357-9 04-08-8I 05-08-91 5.750 I,200,000' 6,111.66 389-603897-7 04-08-9I 05-08-9I 5.750 I,420,000' II,843.20 389-607952-6 04-08-9I 05-08-9I 5.750 50,000, 4I7.0I Home Savings 107-022762-2 04-08-9I 06-07-9I 5,800 IOO/OOO. 495'0I I07-022769-7 04-08-9I 06-07-9I 5.800 I,200,000' 6,I73'37 Total Invested $3,970,000, $ 25,040'25 AoziI 1991 Register Federal I.D. No. 95-6000780 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3 32 RESOLUTION NO. 1937 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAN JACINTO AUTHORIZING DEFERRED PAYMENT OF FEES RELATED TO REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION NO. 66 RECITALS WHEREAS, Government Code Sections 54990 and 54992 authorize a City to impose fees based upon the reasonable cost of providing services related to zone changes, the filing and processing of applications for reorganization, the processing of maps, or other planning services; and WHEREAS, San Jacinto City Ordinance No. 622, April 18, 1978, prescribes the procedures and further authorizes the establishment of fees for the administration of planning, zoning and subdivision applications; and WHEREAS, a majority of the property owners contained within Proposed Annexation No. 66 (as described in the attached Exhibit "A") have requested to be annexed within the City of San Jacinto; and WHEREAS, in processing the proposed Annexation No. 66, the services of City staff and outside consultants will be required to perform planning functions including, but not limited to, the preparation and processing of the annexation request, the preparation and processing of a General Plan Amendment and pre -annexation zone changes, environmental investigations, preparation of draft and final environmental impact reports, preparation of land -use plans and circulation plans, and preparation of a fiscal impact report. The list of services to be provided and the estimated costs thereof in the annexaticn and planning process are contained in Exhibit "B" attached hereto; and WHEREAS, all of the services to be, provided by the City and the consultants herein, will cause a financial benefit to property values in the annexed area, and will provide basic and valuable planning services for future development and infrastructure for the area; and WHEREAS, the costs listed in Exhibit "B" are the estimated reasonable costs for which the within fees are calculated and said fees will not exceed such estimated reasonable costs; and WHEREAS, all property owners within proposed Annexation No. 66 should share equally in the estimated reasonable costs attributable to the project, and that said costs should be attributable evenly over the acreage witnin the project. The said per acre fee for the estimated reasonable costs is $78.00/acre; and WHEREAS, the property owners of the parcels listed in the attached Exhibit "C" have previously paid all or a portion of their share of the reasonable estimated, costs of the project and the property owners of the remaining parcels listed in the attached Exhibit "D" have not paid their share of such costs; and 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 WHEREAS, th( 'ty is willing to advance the fuu necessary for compltion of the project as were not previously collected from the owners of parcels listed in Exhibit "C" and "D" and those owners who provide payment {pursuant to this resolution prior to September 1, 1991, and to defer collection thereof to a time no later than the presentation of any application for development, building, zoning, permit or any other discretionary action requested by the property owner or developer; and WHEREAS, by reason of said deferment of charges, the City will incur expenses for collection, a is ation and accounting which is reasonably estimated o pe 0% of the per acre fee listed above. Further, by rea on of such deferment, City will lose the investment value of the m ney o advanced and that the reasonable value of such oss i, a imated at 6% per annum, or the increase in the cons er p ce index for the Los Angeles Area Wage Earners and C ers, adjusted annually from the date hereof, whichever is greater. The 20% administration collection and accounting fee shall be computed upon the base fee after annual adjustment as provided herein; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted to consider this resolution and public testimony was taken on May 7, 1991. EOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of San Jacinto confirms Resolution No. 1937 as follows: 1. Pursuant to the authority of Government Code Sections 54990, 54992 and San Jacinto City Ordinance 622 there is hereby imposed a one-time fee of $78.00 per acre within all territory located within proposed Annexation No. 66 as described in the attached Exhibit "A". If the fee charged herein creates revenues in excess of the total cost of processing Annexation 66 and its associated planning activities, the excess revenues shall be reimbursed to the peyer. Should the fee charges herein create revenues less 18 than the actual cost, the City may, by resolution amend the estimated acreage fee to conform to the actual cost. Said 19 fee is immediately due and payable by all property owners within said area and shall be paid in an amount equal to the 20 per acre fee multiplied by the number of acres owned by each property owner, less any amounts previously received from a 21 property owner within the proposed area and applied toward the fee stated herein. Sucessful completion of the proposed annexation; in whole or in part, shall not be a condition precedent to the obligation of a property owner to pay said fee. No person or entity shall be entitled to reimbursement or refund of fees paid should the project fail to receive LAFCO approval, whether in whole or in part. 2. In the event any property owner fails to pay the fee imposed by September 1, 1991, City agrees that such fee may be deferred to a date no later than the presentation of any application for development, building, zoning, permit or any other discretionary action effecting the property as requested by the then property owner or developer; however such fee shall first be adjusted annually at the rate of 6% per annum, or at the rate of the increase in the consumer price index for all wage earners and consumers in the Los Angeles Area (whichever is greater). Further, there shall be •r. assessed a 20% fee t- cover City's costs of collection, accounting, and adm tration based upon the total fe aen due after annual adl,__,tment. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6 7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3 32 1991. ATTEST: MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED on the day of Deputy City Clerk Mayor CERTIFICATE The forgoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. 1937 duly adopted by the said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein. Deputy City Clerk EXHIBIT "I RESOLUTION 1937 'SECTIONS 113, 30 ,e4ND'31 AND P'-`RTIONS OF SECTIONS 7, (3, 17, 10 20, 213 AND 32, T.4S., R tv AND SECTION 24 AND PORTIOt OF SECTIONS I I, 12, 13, 14, 23, AND 3Co, -r.45., R.2Vv., S.B.Py1 LYING WITHIN RANCHO SAN JACL..T0 VIEJO AND RANCHO SAN JAL...-1TO NUEVO. NO°03.4""E w _ 7%9 • c7)-- ;j3 2 Z ▪ •\\ o> ma) IC3 z z -;5 f.() 0 ——SEE DETAIL "D" SHEET 3 N. a _ I 12 4•-• N 0 : kkO• _,••0 .., • 0 rn lk is,C..\`'n --- 1 -- 14113 ,t > i , rev fr) 4. -q>, SEC'S 11 & i4 c3 •.: 4 in o 0 0 SI/4 COR. (SEC. 14 140°00'52"E 15015,57' ••--- YV1/4 COR. SEC. 25-- NO'12-'51"Wi vat?; CFC?•••-: • • 689'552-1"E 0 tt 310.9C7'--A z SEE DETAIL "C" SHEET 3•••.. SW COR. PAR. MAP 121`31•••••"1 26_05 35136 13 18 24 19 24 19 25 30 it .25 .*%••-•••••P -36 _boc0 NNEE11//44 to Ic° n N tct -c4— Z • — 0 c74) en 2 P1100 1.0 i Ind, bto SEE DETAIL"B" . SHEET ANNEXATION NO. 66 CITY OF SAN Cl TO NBS/LOWRY ENGINEERS a PLANNERS 1545 W. FLORIDA AVE. HEMET CA 9234 LAFCO NO. DATE PREPARED A.1 l'4G'55 / L.822.53' ..•••K=4000' 11Cpcfsp'7)41 • 1,z•//Cow5' soiso. R/W coo 1 in - ..... N' , LINE PAR. ;t- 7 ; 8 MAP 23141 wen—. —1E3717— zoJ 0 "JCL is.a: < •1 /4.• i (NI 47. •••• • IL %L.) 4 i(C. •Li EXPRESSWAY • t- >•• 17- S5,•41' 3-7 " E 1555.20'••• 68 tf_ NW COR'. ANNEX. NO. 5C, \. 11.3417 19 20 SEE DETAIL"A" ,SHEET 2. 50%50' R/ 19 120 i6r2i 1 50730' IZJW 50%5 1C/W 50%30' COTTONW000 AVE. 30 30129 31 31132 50./55' R/VY 30750' -7TH ST. 0 5 I( (, Z., 50V30' / > :-; riw -,. „ 4-r• SPLANADE 0 M v AVENUE 1 T.4S.' 311132 R/ W T.5S. 6 11 5 NES9°2.3.2/3"W 7934.4-61 JOHN M. GAYDOS, L.S. SB2C) PREPARED FOR AND ON BEHALF OF N ms/i OW RY 154-5 W. FLORIDA AVE. HEMET CA "234-3 1 RAMONA:\ "BLVD. •••SC.41.8‘. S3-7•4C0.43"W &=3-1•40'3(3'' L 1 1800' 1163.00C,' -N. ci• In • Z 0 IN co 2 {tu r et a cfl� SCALE 1" .3000' EXHIBIT "B" CITY FILING AND PROCESSING FEES $133,830.00 ANNEXATION FEES LAFCO FILING FISH & GAME EIR COUNTY CLERK SURVEY REVIEW BOARD OF EQUALIZATION TOTAL FEES 2,200.00 850.00 25.00 360.00 1,750.00 5,185.00 NBS/LOWRY 86,800.00 TURRINI & BRINK 57,709.56 ULTRA SYSTEMS 142,790.00 CHRISTENSEN & WALLACE 8,500.00 SUB -TOTAL $434,815.00 5% RESERVE FUND $ 21,741.00 TOTAL FEES $456,556.00 TOTAL ACREAGE 5820.71 COST PER ACRE $ 78.00 April 30, 1991 Nancy Randolph: You asked me to givs, you a note of what would be required at the gazebo on May 19 for the ceremony at 4 p.m. Will need 125 chairs and would like them divided on either side of an aisle leading up to the front steps of the gazebo. Will need the key to the electric box so we can use a micro- phone. Would like to be able to mark off at least 6 parking spaces in the new lot - hope that's 0,K. Think that's all - except I hope the sprinkler system wouldn't come on between 3:30 p.m. and 5 p.m. that day! Did notice a large puddle of water in the middle of the gazebo yesterday afternoon around 4 - I wonder why that would be? Do let me know if this cannot be done so we can make other arrangements! Jeannette Hofmann We are representing the D.E.S. Club of San Jacinto (Holy Spirit), and at Hofmann Park on Sunday, June l6th, 1991, at 2:00 p.m. for the purpose of holding a Holy Mass, with approximately 200 people attending The Service will last approximately an hour or 11/2 hours at the most. It is a Portuguese Religious Custom and has been held within the City of San Jacinto for the past seven years. Food will be served at the San Jacinto Community Center. ask your permission to use the Gazebo We have our own Public Address System and have engaged the services of Gillespie Security for the event. We will also remove all trash leaving the facility in the condition it was when we arrived. Dated this 30th day of April 1991 Alvarina Teixeira _ ,„ City Hall — 201 East Main Street 714 - 654-7337 May 3, 1991 Mr. Jack Lehmeier 1521 Sandlewood Drive Hemet, California 92343 Post Office Box 488 San Jacinto, California. 92383 Subject: Vosburg Hotel Twenty -Four Hour Care of Homeless and Low Income People Dear Mr. Lehmeier: City Staff is still in the process of analyzing your request for use of the Vosburg Hotel as a twenty-four hour care facility for homeless and low income people. As yet, we have not had a chance to meet with the City Council. Therefore, this will not be on the agenda until May 21, 1991. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, I ,--, (}I BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM: lr 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager FROM: Henry T. Garcia, Assistant City Manager DATE: May 2, 1991 SUBJ: MOBILE HOME RENT REVIEW UPDATE At the City Council meeting of December 18, 1990, the Council heard public input from Walt Wilson, who is the area President of the Golden State Mobilehome Owner's League (GSMOL), Ms. Mary Sims, GSMOL volunteer and Ms. Mary Jane Hyes-Hannegan, who resides at Las Casitas Mobile Home Park, regarding escalating rent increases. Based upon the input received, the City Council set the date of January 8, 1991 to hold a workshop on mobile home rent review. At the workshop, the City Council and staff heard further input from Mr. Wilson requesting the City consider adopting a mobile home rent review ordinance to control park owner profits. Based upon the input received, the Council directed Staff to submit a report/recommendation back to the City Council in four months. At this time, Staff is prepared to present a timeline of action. For the past several months, Staff has been reviewing ordinances from other municipalities as well as meeting with appropriate staff members from other cities to better understand the administrative guidelines necessary to appropriately study the rent control issue. For your information, Staff, assisted by GSMOL, is in the process of conducting a consumer price index study (CPI). This study will review rent increases for the last five years, and compare the increases against the annual CPI. The study is =.‘ bedJled to be completed during the month of May. The study will give the City Council a clear picture of whether or not there is a definable mobile home owner problem. For your information, the preliminary data indicates that rent increases have far exceeded the CPI. Regardless of the study findings, Staff recommends the City Council authorize Staff to initiate and facilitate meetings between the homeowners and the park owners. The purpose of these meetings will be to bring both parties together to resolve their respective differences. Should no solutions come from these meetings, staff recommends the City Council authorize staff to begin establishing the necessary groundwork to implement a mobile home rent control ordinance. Attached to this correspondence is a proposed timeline of action for your review and comments. TIMELINE 1-92 City Council adopt Mobile Home Rent Control Ordinance 12-91 City staff prepare draft Mobile Home Rent Control Ordinance 11-91 City staff prepare draft Mobile Home Rent Control Ordinance 10-91 City staff prepare draft Mobile Home Rent Control Ordinance 9-91 8-91 7-91 6-91 Conduct Mobile Home Conduct Mobile Home Conduct Mobile Home owner's owner's owner's and park owner meetings and park owner meetings and park owner meetings City staff presents results of Consumer Price Index study to City Council 5-91 City staff and GSMOL conduct Consumer Price Index study 4-91 City staff discusses Mobile Home Rent Review with other municipality staff members. 3-91 City staff receives/reviews sample Mobile Control Ordinances from other municipalities Ordinances Home Rent 1-8-91 The Cy 'Council authorizes staff to study the feasibility of adopting a rent control (review) ordinance AT MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: May 3, 1991 SUBJ: Growth Management Task Force "VISION FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY" Pam had asked City Staff to review the document "A VISION FOR RIVERSIDE COUNTY" the 21st Century and comment on it. The Planning Department has completed its review and has the following comments: 1. The basic concept of A UNITED VISION FOR THE COUNTY, endorsed by all jurisdictions is an attractive, but difficult goal to achieve. We endorse the effort. 2. Land Use: Urban Centers - the description seems to preclude rural uses from being within urban centers. 3. Land Use: Agricultural Areas - this section appears to preclude agricultural uses within an incorporated city. It also specifically identifies the San Jacinto Valley as destined for permanent agricultural uses. This raises the question as to whether there is already a predetermined crban limit- 4. Land Use: Natural Areas - According to this section, natural areas such as mountain ridges would be preserved as assets of public value. While this is a positive generic goal, it fails to take into account the individual needs of any given community. For example: this goal may affect any potential development on North Mountain as well as the mountainous area of Annexation 66. As a result San Jacinto could lose out on housing opportunities for upper income households and resort development opportunities which may be essential to the local economy. 5. Quality of Life Issues: Job Development - The document states job opportunities will be created to eliminate excessive use of the transportation network in order to reduce air quality impacts. Staff feels there should be an emphasis on job development, including possibly added incentives, in areas which might typically be considered bedroom communities. We are forwarding a copy of this memo to A. J. Wilson of WRCOG and would appreciate Council input in the matter. Respectfully Submitted, BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM: lr