Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 4/2/1991AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 625 South Pico. San Jacinto DATE: April 2, 1991 TIME: 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL: Boykin, Ford, Hafliger, Leahy, Rose MOMENT OF SILENCE FOR. REFLECTION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE I. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion by the City Council in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests specified items to be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Mayor, state their name, address, and the Consent Calendar item number. A. Approval of Minutes of March 19 and 26, 1991. B. Approval of Warrant Nos. 24696 through 24793, as submitted by the Finance Director. C. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1947 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, supporting an "Inland Empire" postmark for mail processed at the San Bernardino General Mail Facility. (Staff recommends approval.) 1 April 2, 1991 Agenda Page 2 D. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1949 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, granting tentative approval of cancellation of agricultural preserve contract. (Staff recommends adoption). E. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1951 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto extending the use of Angle Parking on portions of Main Street. (City Attorney recommends approval.) F. Award of Contract to the Nadel Partnership, Inc. for Master Planning Services for area east of San Jacinto Avenue, between Esplanade and Commonwealth. (Staff recommends approval.) G. Approval of Physical Fitness Program for City Employees. (Staff recommends approval.) H. Delegation of authorization to develop an Economic Development -related to the Economic Development Council Committee Brochure. (Staff recommends approval.) I, Authorization to proceed with Worker's Compensation Agreement with the Coachella Valley Joint Powers Insurance Authority (Wear & Wood) and cancel Agreement with Bierly & Associates, effective July 1, 1991. (Staff recommends approval.) J. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1952 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, ordering the annexation of certain uninhabited territory to the City of San Jacinto (Annexation No. 63). (Staff recommends approval.) K. Time Deposit Registers for period ending March 31, 1991. (Receive and file.) L. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda pursuant to City Attorney. 2 April 2, 1991 Agenda Page 3 II. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to approve consent calendar items A through L, adopting Resolution Nos. 1947, 1949, 1951, and 1952 and waive the readings in full. Vote: PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Environmental Impact Assessment and Tentative Tract Maps 24050, 24051, 24052, 24053, 24054, 24055, 24056, 24057, 26426, 24627 Applicant: PR Equities Location: approximately 600 feet east of Hewitt Street, north of Washington Avenue, west of Meridian Street, south of Esplanade Avenue and Commonwealth Avenue Proposal for 10 subdivisions within Specific Plan 2-88 for a total of 883 lots on approximately 181.69 acres. (Planning Commission recommends approval.) Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to Vote: B. Adoption of fees for processing of various development applications. Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to open the public hearing and continue to April 16, 1991. Vote: C. Establishment of Park Fees Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 932 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, a California municipality, establishing regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreation land in subdivisions and on single parcels and the repeal of Ordinance No. 596. 3 April 2, 1991 Agenda Page 4 PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont'd) Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to introduce Ordinance No. 932 to second reading and waive the reading in full. D. Proposed removal of weeds, rubbish and refuse Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1950 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, overruling objections and deteLmining to proceed with abatement. Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to open the Public Hearing and continue to meeting of. April 16, 1991. Vote: III. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS A. Valley -Wide Youth Baseball Parade on April 13, 1991 Karen Robles IV. CITY DEPARTMENTS A. Update on The Villas Water - John Townsel B. Selection of Paramedic Committee - Ross Chadwick C `fir (Request for continuance to May 7, 1991 meeting) _ C. Feedback from recent Refuse Mailer oral presentation by Pamela S. Easter April 2, 1991 Agenda Page 5 V. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS A. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1948 A Resolution of the City of San Jacinto, California, supporting the desire of the City of Lake Elsinore to acquire and exercise jurisdiction of the Lake. Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to adopt Resolution No. 1948 and waive the reading in full. Vote: VI. EXECUTIVE SESSION - to discuss Labor Negotiations and Personnel Matters Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to go into Executive Session for the discussion of Labor Negotiations and Personnel Matters. Vote: Time: Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to return to Regular Session. Vote: Time: VII. ADJOURNMENT Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to p.m. adjourn to April 16, 1991 at 7:30 Vote: Time: Next regular City Council meeting April 16, 1991 5 1 CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: DESCRIPTION PLANNING COMMISSION ANSMITTAL TO CITY COUNCIL April 2, 1991 Tract Maps of Specific Plan 2-88 Tentative Tracts 24050, 24051, 24052, 24053, 24054, 24055, 24056, 24057, 26426, 26427 PR EQUITIES 1655 E. 6th Street Corona, CA 91719 (714) 272-6660 A proposal for 10 subdivisions within Specific Plan 2-88 of a total of 883 lots on approximately 181.69 acres located 600 feet east of Hewitt Street, north of Washington Avenue, west of Meridian Street, south of Esplanade Avenue and Commonwealth Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL: The Planning Commission approved the subject tract maps, however because these maps are within a specific plan area they are also subject to review by the City Council for ultimate approval. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve the subject tract maps. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff has attached the report for Tentative Tract 24050, the staff report to the Planning Commission, and the Conditions of Approval for each individual rase as exhibits for your review. The ten subject maps were filed over several months however, the staff reports, findings, and conditions of approval for each report were essentially the same. A copy of each proposed Tentative Tract map is also included for your review. A copy of each report is available should you wish to review each report on an individual basis. STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Ver Plank and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development SUBJ: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACI 24050 DAIS: January 17, 1991 APPLICANT: PR EQUITIES 1655 E. 6th Street Corona, CA 91719 (714) 272-6660 ENGINEER: NBS LOWRY 1545 W. Florida Avenue Hemet, CA 92343 (714) 658-7116 DESCRIPTION A proposed 83 lot single family subdivision on approximately 15.68 acres located south of Commonwealth Avenue approximately 600' east of Hewitt Street. EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT "B" EXHIBIT "C" EXHIBIT "D" EXHIBIT "E" EXHIBIT "F" EXHIBIT "G" EXHIBIT "H" EXHIBIT "I" BASE MAP EXISTING Gr RHI, PLAN EXIS 11NG ZONING CURRENT USES EXISTING CIRCULATION FLOOD ZONE SEISMIC ZONE - PROPOSED SITE PLAN AREA MAP PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 13, 1991 PAGE NO 1 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The detailed environmental analysis was performed for Specific Plan 1-88 and 2-88. At that time, the following impacts were identified: [1] Local and regional drainage [2] Local roadways and intersections [3] Parks [4] Public safety structures and equipment [5] Public safety staffing [6] Noise [7] Air Quality Local and regional drainage have been mitigated through the consultation of an extensive chantiel and storm droin system. Local roadway and intersection impacts were partially mitigated through widening and traffic signals. Public safety equipment and staffing concerns were mitigated in part by the requirement to purchase a fire truck and to create a public safety financing district. Subsequently the Fire Department has adopted a fee to mitigate impacts on future capital structures. The park impacts were mitigated by the construction of a park and the open channel system. The school impacts were mitigated in part by the requirement to reserve a school site and payment of development fees. Air Quality was addressed by the application of a car pool mitigation fee. Since the original environmental review, the City has refined its environmental process and identified impacts on local and regional transportation, public buildings as well as additional school impacts. The mitigation of all, but schools, has been established through the payment of fees. Schools have been mitigated through the requirement to participate in a financing district, if created by the City Council. The City has executed a development agreement with PR Equities which may preclude any additional environmental conditions, but a final determination is yet to be made. DISCUSSION The existing General Plan for the area is Medium Density Residential. Adjacent General Plan designations are Medium and Low Density Residential. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 13, 1991 PAGE NO 2 Current zoning is R-1, Single Family. The adjacent zoning consists of C-2, General Corruinercial, A, Agricultural, R-2, PUD and R-1, Single Family. Existing adjacent uses consist of residential and vacant uses. The proposed lots confirm to the City Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance requirements. Access is available to the site from Commonwealth Avenue and the proposed Arroyo Viejo Drive. (see Exhibit "E") RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution 91-1 Staff Report, Findings (.;t: Fact, and Conditions of Approval :ippro..ring Tentative Parcel Map 24050 and grant a Negative Declaration. Brian McNabb Director of Community Development PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 13, 1991 PAGE NO 3 FINDINGS OF FACT TENTATIVE TRACT 24050 1. Water and sewer are available, however, extensions will be required to service the subject development. 2. Tract 24050 is not located within a known seismic zone. 3. Tract 24050 is not located within a known "A" Flood Zone. 4. The subject site is within the habitat range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. 5. Tract 24050 will generate approximately 581 to 747 vehicular trips per day. 6. The existing General Plan is Medium Density Residential. The existing zoning is R-1, Single Family Residential. 7. The lots conform to the City Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance. 8. Access to the site will be from Commonwealth Avenue and the proposed Arroyo Viejo Drive. 9. The proposed subdivision will add to the congestion of existing streets and roadways. 10. The proposed subdivision will create additional demand for parks and recreational facilities as well as impact existing facilities. 11. Public safety services will be impacted by the proposed development. 12 Negative impacts on air quality will be created by additional traffic and other cumulative impacts of development. 13. Schools are impacted by residential development. 14. Public facilities will be impacted by the proposed development as well as the potential for new facilities. 15. The proposed development will add to the breakdown of existing roads and streets. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — TENTATIVE TRACT 24050 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 1. Pay regional and local roadway mitigation fee in effect at the time of building permit issuance (currently $820 / acre and $500 / acre respectively) PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 13, 1991 PAGE NO 4 Pay car pool mitigation fee in effect at the time of building permit issuance (currently $90.00 / unit) 3. Pay all school fees and participate as required by City in an assessment district to finance school facilities. 4. Pay public building mitigation fee (currently $65 / acre) PUBLIC WORKS 1. Marbelite street light poles shall be purchased on City system. 2. Street trees shall be purchased from the City for planting in public right of way. 3. Landscape plans shall be submitted for approval. 4. All Lots shall be connected to the sewer system. 5. Construct handicapped ramps per City standards. 6. Construct 5.5' sidewalk per City standards. 7. Provide matching street paving, as applicable. 8. Install curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Curb face shall be determined by a hydrology study. 9. Submit signing and striping plan. 10. Landscape plans shall be submitted for approval, using water conserving irrigation system. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Submit typical landscape and automatic watering system plans. All front yards shall have landscaping. 2. A perimeter decorative wall shall be required around the subdivision. The project shall comply with the City's fencing regulations at time of building permit issuance. 3. Developer shall join or establish a Lighting and landscaping Maintenance District. 4. All applicable development fees effective at the time of the issuance of PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 13, 1991 PAGE NO 5 building permits shall be paid. 5. All new and existing utilities shall be underground. 6. Final grading, parking, paving and landscaping plans shall be submitted for approval. 7. Black address numbers on white florescent background shall be painted on the curb. Numbers shall be a minimum 4 inches in height. 8. Consult with the San Jacinto Post Office regarding the type and placement of the mail boxes. 9. Grading and public improvements shall be installed in accordance with City Standards and specifications. 10. Comply with conditions of Specific Plan 1-88 and 2-88. POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. All required traffic signs shall be installed with the approval of the traffic engineer. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MONITORING 1. Developer shall provide a Declaration stating how all significant environmental concerns will be mitigated, prior to the recordation of a final map. 2. Upon the approval of the Declaration, it shall be noticed on the Final Map and recorded simultaneously. 3. Upon the start of construction, at six month intervals, and prior to occupancy the developer shall provide a status report relating to compliance with the mitigation measures. 4. Prior to occupancy, the City shall verify compliance with the mitigation measures. Mitigation of environmental impacts shall be in accordance with the existing development agreement underlying this tract. FIRE DEPARTMENT INCORPORATE HEREIN THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CHECKLIST DATED DECEMBER 20, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 13, 1991 PAGE NO 6 ectAkwry- 0 C P, IT fon. 146 6-ct_c_A 4 62(0,(-)7 (0(1) s65,,,, 7%,„.„/ dx„, (.4 81 Ih SG t-rrzLJ "a l/°( /t oy sC> j� �� (G jZ b e---/r' l u-C nn� .twee z �_ e. �� u�- vt</ _ f -' C;- i' rcti,,u, MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: March 28, 1991 SUBJ: Ordinance 932 In the mid 1970s, the City adopted Ordinance 596, establishing park fees pursuant to state law. These fees, still in effect, are inadequate for their stated purpose of acquiring and improving parks. The general plan of the City states that there should be 3 acres of park space per 1000 people. Staff is recommending the regulations as set forth in Ordinance 596 be repealed and replaced instead by a model ordinance developed by the League of California Cities. This new ordinance and imposition of a lighting and landscape maintenance district on the entire City at some future date, will create the mechanism in which the City will have adequate funds for the construction and maintenance of parks for its citizenry. Respectfully Submitted, - 6 BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM: lr ORDINANCE NO. 932 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, A CALIFORNIA MUNICIPALITY, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR DEDICATION OF LAND, PAYMENT OF FEES, OR BOTH, FOR PARK AND RECREATION LAND IN SUBDIVISIONS AND ON SINGLE PARCELS AND THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 596. The City Council of the City of San Jacinto does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Purpose. This ordinance is enacted pursuant to the authority granted by Section 66477 of the Government Code of the State of California. The park and recreation facilities for which dedication of land and/or payment of a fee is required by this ordinance are in accordance with the "Aesthetics, Cultural, and Recreation Resources Element" of the General Flan of the City of San Jacinto, adopted by the City of San Jacinto on May 5,1987. SECTION 2: Requirements. At the time of approval of the tentative map or parcel map, the city Planning Commission shall determine pursuant to Section 4 hereof the land required for dedication or in lieu fee payment. As a condition of approval of a final subdivision map or parcel mar:, th, subdivider vider shall laic, pay a fee in the,reof, or both, at the option the city P anninc Comm' se o`' , fail- neighborhood and commuun' ty .._ ...'C f.. v--, r. ii,- moos _. ' ,'. r.: ::.''� c: n., nr ' nn' C thE, _L___C.a;_iS an(_' _,itUia conta1 :JC 7?7 i-.hi.£ ordinance,. SECTION3: Standard. It is hereby found and General S � �_� determined that the public interest, convenience, health, welfare, and safety require that three acres of property for each 1,000 persons residing with this city be devoted to local park any: recreational purposes. SECTION 4: Formula for dedication of land. Where a park or recreation facility has been designated in the "Aesthetics, Cultural, and Recreational Resources Element", an element of the general plan of the city, and is to be located in whole or in part within the proposed subdivision to serve the immediate and future needs of the residents of the subdivision, the subdivider shall dedicate land for a local park sufficient in size and topography that bears a reasonable relationship to serve the present and future needs of the residents of the subdivision. The amount of land to be provided shall be determined pursuant to the following formula: Average No. of Persons/Un minimum t . 1,000 population = acreage 3 dedication The following table of population density has been established pursuant to Section 66477(b) of the Government Code: Park Land Dedication Formula Table Types of Dwellings Single -Family Detached Single -Family Attached 2-4 units 5+ units Mobilehomes Average Density/DU 2.918 1.747 2.559 2.'236 1.614 Acreage/DU (3 ac. std.) .0088 .0052 .0077 .0067 .0048 Dedication of the land shall be made in accordance procedures contained in Section 12 hereof. with the For the purposes of this section, the number of new dwelling units shall be based upon the number or parcels indicated on the map when in an area zoned for one dwelling per parcel. When all or rar"t of the subdivision is located in an area zoned for more than :.; is E' dw .. _: ^, tiI._L per Via_ CC1 the number of proposed dwelling units in the area so zoned shall equal the maximum allowed under that zone. In the case of a condominium project, the number of new dwelling units shall be the number of condominium units. The term new d,.welling unit" doe: not include dwellina units lawfully in place prior to which the parcel or final mao is filed. The t dit: street S.A 1✓C.I�J iC�iC7 �1S.=.i- v. 7. _It bout �i C9 :<`._t i� nr �" _�.__ _i. E]E�� improvements and utility connections 1nclud.in , but not limited to curbs, gutters, street paving, traffic control devices, street trees, and=idewal._s to land which is dedicated pursuant to this section; _' provide for fencing along the aroperty line of that portion cf the subs..=vi _ino. contiguous to the ''edit ated land.; 3) provide_ imoroved rainase through the site; and 4 provide Other minimal improvements wh cl. the city P 1. arin__-_ Cohan-ssi o__ determines to he essential to the acceptance of the land for recreational purposes. The land to be dedicated and the improvements to be made pursuant to this section shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. SECTION 5: Fee Requirements for New Residential Construction Not Within a Subdivision. In addition to any other fee or fees prescribed, every person constructing any new dwelling unit or placing a mobil_eheme in the City on parcels, or in subdivision or land divisions approved prior to the adoption of this ordinance, unless there has been prior agreement for park dedication in lieu of fees, shall pay to the City Treasurer a fee per the formula established in Section 7. No land dedication is acceptable. For purposes of this section, fair market value shall be the land value as shown on the most current County of Riverside Assessor's records. SECTION 6: Formula for fees in lieu of land dedication. (a) General Formula. If there is no park or recreation facility designated in the "Aesthetics, Cultural, and Recreational Resources Element", to be located in whole or in part within the proposed subdivision to serve the immediate and future needs of the residents of the subdivision, the subdivider shall, in lieu of dedicating land, pay a fee equal to the value of that land, pleb 20% toward costs of off -site improvements, prescribed for dedication in Section 4 hereof and in an amount determined in accordance with provisions of Section 7 hereof, such fee to be used for a local park which bears a reasonable relationship to serve the present and future residents of the area being subdivided. For the purposes of this ordinance, off -site improvements are defined as those improvements which would have been required i land had been dedicated using the rovisior'is of Section 4. (b) Fees in Lieu of Land; 50 Parcels o,_ Less. If the proposed subdivision contains fifty (50) parcels or less, the subdivider shall pay a fee equal to the land value, plus 20% toward costs of off -site _mprc`vements, of the portion of the Inca] park required to ser-,'e The needs of residents of the _ subdivision as prescribed in Section 4 hereof and in an amount. de rm ned in t f However, nothing in this section shall prohibit tl_e dedication 3 Ti C. acceptance of land for park and recreation pUrpOS2S in subdivisions of fifty parcels or less, where the subdivider proposes such dedication voluntarily and the land is acceptable to the Planning Commission. c) Use c1 Money. The money collected hereunder shall be used only for the purpose of acquiring necessary land an:1 developing new or rehabilitating existing park or recreation facilities reasonably related to serving the subdivision. SECTION 7: Criteria for Requiring Both Dedication and Fee. In subdivisions of more than fifty (50) parcels, the subdivider shall both dedicate land and pay a fee in lieu thereof in accordance with the following formula: (a) When only a portion of the land to be subdivided is proposed on the "Aesthetics, Cultural, and Recreational Resources Element" as the site for a local park, such portion shall be dedicated for - 3 - local park purposes and a fee computed pursuant to the provision of Section 7 hereof shall be paid for the value of any additional land, plus 20a toward costs of off -site improvements, that would have been required to be dedicated pursuant to Section 4 hereof. (b) When a major part of the local park or recreation site has already been acquired by the city and only a small portion of land is needed from the subdivision to complete the site, such remaining portion shall he dedicated and a fee computed pursuant to the provision of Section 7 hereof shall be paid in an amount equal to the value of the land, plus 20% toward the costs of off -site improvements, which would otherwise have been,required to be dedicated pursuant to Section 4 hereof, such fees to be used for the improvement of other local parks and recreation facilities in the area serving the subdivision. SECTION 8: amount of Fee In Lieu of Land Dedication. When a fee is to be paid in lieu of land dedication, the amount of such fee shall be based upon the fair market value of the amount of land which would otherwise be required for dedication pursuant to Section 4, plus 20% toward costs of off -site improvements, such as extension of utility lines. The fee shall he determined by the folic;,__ _ formula: Mks t where Pop r rr acres __ FMV 1,000 p_op1e Build d;*el _;q Populat._cn per r_wel subtotal X /5 = in -lieu acre fee ned in Section value, - F<ir ;T:a rl',e i= a:-; determined by dable acre = A typical acre cf the subdivision,, With a slope less than ldb, and located. in. other than an area cn which huildihc is excluded because of flooding, easements, or other restrictions. Fees to be collected pursuant to this section shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. SECTION 9: Determination of Fair Market Value. The fair market value shall be determined by the city with a written appraisal report prepared and signed by an appraiser acceptable to the city'.'€ The appraisal shall be made immediately prior to the filing of the final map. The subdivider shall notify the city of the expected filing date at least six (6) weeks prior to filing of the final map. If more than one (1) year elapses prior to filing the final map, the city will prepare a new appraisal and will bill the subdivider for the cost of the reappraisal. For the purposes of this chapter, the determination of the fair market value of a buildable acre, as defined in Section 7, shall consider, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: 1. approval of and conditions of the tentative subdivision map 2. the general plan 3. zoning 4. property location 5. off -site improvements facilitating use of the property 6. site characteristics of the property If the subdivider objects to the determined fair market value, he/she may appeal to the City Council who shall hear the appeal under the same rules and obligations current for local board of equal_°nation hearings, except that the burden of proof shall lie with the subdivider. SECTION 10: Determination of Land or Fee. Whether the Planning Commission accepts land dedication or elects to require payment of a fee in lieu thereof, or a combination of both, shall be determined by consideration of the following: y, (a) The natural features, access, and location of land in the suhdiVisl. or_ available_ for dedication, (b) The size and shape or the subdivision and land available dedication; (CJ The 'fe.asib'_lity ility C8__ ded=cr-_-.o Res„c wi th proposed. The cietermi iati��: cn ct the lannina Commission as shall be dedicated, or l te:. ayfer_ _hail b_ c u rhination thereof, shall be fiii and concius ,.e and r land a SECTION 11: Credit for Private Open Space. No credit shall be given for private open space in the subdivision except as hereinafter provided. Where private open space usable for active recreational purposes is provided in a proposed planned development or real estate development as defined in Sections 11003 and 11003.1 of the Business and Professions Code, partial credit, not to exceed (50%), shall be given against the requirement of land dedication or payment of fees in lieu thereof if the Planning Commission finds that it is in the public interest to do so and that all the following standards are met: (a) Yards, court areas, setbacks, and other open areas required by the zoning and building ordinances and regulations shall not be included in the computation of such private open space; and (b) Private park and recreation facilities shall be owned by a homes association composed of all property owners in the subdivision and being an incorporated nonprofit organization capable of dissolution only by a 100% affirmative vote of the membership, operated under recorded land agreements through which each lot owner in the neighborhood is automatically a member, and each lot is subject to a charge for a proportionate share of expenses for maintaining the facilities. (c) Use of the private open space is restricted for park and recreation purposes by recorded covenrnt which runs with the land in favor of the future owners of the property and which cannot be defeated or eliminated without the consent of the city or its successor; and, (d) The proposed private open space is reasonably adaptable for use fcr park and recreation purposes, taking into consideration such factors as size, shape, topography, geology, access, a: .. location; and, (e) FaC_11ti es _`reposed for the open space are in substantial accordance with th,, rroGisions of the "Aesthetics, Cultural, and Recreational Resources Element" of the general plan; and, space for which c_E general e y five acres end. provides .all of ioc r.a ,. b_asi c. '_fisted. below, or a. combihat±on. such and other ecreat-; c rsov=ants that ..___ ...:._raf the "n, ci. __ rec r _e__a '�'..:. reside of t.":e _. __a . Recreational open spaces, which a .se generally defined as park ares for active recreation pursuits such as soccer, golf, baseball, softball_ and football, and have at least one acre of maintained turf with less i:h_.r 5q lc e. Court areas, which are generally clef -in ee as tennis courts, badminton courts, shuffleboard courts, or similar hard -surfaced areas especially designed and exclusively used for court games. (3) Recreational swimming areas, which are defined generally as fenced areas devoted primarily to swimming, diving or both. They must also include decks, lawned area, bathhouses, or other facilities developed and used exclusively for swimming and diving and consisting of no less than 15 square feet of water surface area per pool, together with an adjacent deck and/or lawn area twice that of the pool. (4) Recreation buildings and facilities designed and primarily used for the recreational needs of residents of the development. The determination of the Planning Commission as to whether credit shall be given and the amount of credit shall be final and conclusive. SECTION L2: Procedure. At the time of approval of the tentative map or parcel map, the Planning Commission shall determine pursuant to Section 4 hereof the land required for dedication. If the Planning Commission requires in -lieu fee payment by the subdivider. the Planning Commission will set t'e amount of land upon which the in -lieu fee will be based at the time of final map approval. At the time of the filing of the final subdivision map or parcel map, the subdivider shall dedicate the land as required by the Planning Commission. Where the Planning Commission has determined that fees shall he paid in -lieu of or in addition to the dedication of land, tFie Planning Commission shall set the in -lieu fees based on the land uer#iCat1CG:'. reG U:ir einen t; as established at the time Of tentative map approval Using current land values at the time of final map approval with the formula set forth in Section 7 and using the process for determining fair market value as set forth in Section 8_ The subdivider shall pay said fee._ in accordance with the followinc schedule: For any subdivision consisting of ten 10) or more )"_; : ,. . be p id,. rr entl 4`ety prior to the issuance .. h ildin . rermit for _ _J orstructure to be located. any lot in the sub _.sision. o. F i. ���: any _u;JCi:i_.,i On Consisting of nine ('�) or 2cSs _Gt" _ shall be paid on a lot -by -lot basis and ri,rior to the Issuance of any building permit for any biiilc_1ng or structure be located upon any one of the lots in the _i i:.bdi:%iSi or. Open space covenants to private parr: or recreation facilities shall be submitted to the city prior to approval of the final subdivision map or parcel map and shall be recorded contemporaneously with final subdivision map or parcel map. SECTION 13: Disposition of Fees. Fees determined pursuant to Section 7 shall be paid to the City Treasurer and shall be deposited into the subdivision park trust fund, or its successor. Money in said fund, including accrued interest, shall be expended solely for acquisition or development of park land, or improvements related thereto. Collected fees shall be appropriated by the city to which the land or fees are conveyed or paid for a specific project to serve residents of the subdivision in a budgetary year within five years upon receipt of payment or within five years after the issuance of building permits on one-half of the lots created by the subdivision, whichever occurs later. If such fees are not so committed, these fees, less an administrative charge, shall be distributed and paid to the then record owners of the subdivision in the same proportion that the size of their lot bears to the total area of all lots in the subdivision per Section-66477 (f) of the Government Code. The City Treasurer shall report to the City Council at least annually on income, expenditures, and status of the subdivision park trust fund: SECTION 14: Exemptions. Subdivisions containing less than five parcels and not used for residential proposes shall be exempted from the requirements of this ordinance; provided, however, that a condition shall be placed on the approval of such parcel map that if a building permit is requested for construction of a residential structure or structures on one or more of the parcels the fee may be required to be paid by the owner cf each such parcel as a condition to the issuance of such permit. The provisions of the ordinance do not apply to commercial or industrial subdivisions; nor do they apply to condominium projects or stock sooreratives which consist of the subdivision ..an• _ -_ �aC�. in existing apartment building which is more than veers old when nc new dwelling units ar£_ added. ..t b t.__3_. .. S.J..:. vide --Provided Park and Re C'"eaLi G'il irovemeiets. The value Gf park and recreation imr'rov rents provided by the subdivider to the dedicated land shall be credited against the fees or dedication of land requi red by this ordinance. The Planning Commission reserves the right to approve ouch impro_-eroents rrior to agreeino to accept the dedication of land. and to require in -lieu fee payments should the land and 1 iTl-r.p 1" 1'v E:"::`-• ..s he unacceptable. SECTION 16: Agency to Accept Land and Fee... Land or fees required under this ordinance shall be conveyed or paid directly to the local public agency which provides park and recreational services on a cornmunitywide level and to the area within which the proposed development will be located, if such agency elects to accept the land or fee. At the time of tentative map approval, the Planning Commission shall determine whether the city is the appropriate local agency. The city, county, or other local public agency to which the land or fees are conveyed or paid shall develop a schedule pursuant to Section 66477 of the Government Code specifying how, when, and where it will use the land or fees, or both, to develop park or recreational facilities to serve residents of the subdivision. SECTION 17: Access. All land offered for dedication for local park or recreational purposes shall have access to at least one existing or proposed public street. This requirement may be waived by the Planning Commission if the Planning Commission determines that public street access is unnecessary for maintenance of the park area or use thereof by residents. SECTION 18: Sale of Dedicated Land. If during the ensuing time between dedication of land for park purposes and commencement of first -stage development, circumstances arise which indicate that another site would be more suitable for local park or recreational purposes serving the subdivision and the neighborhood (such as receipt of a gift of additional park land or a change in school location), the land may be sold upon the approval of the City Council with the resultant funds being used for the purchase of a more suitable site. SECTION 19: Conflict. Ordinance No. 596 and/cr parts of any other ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 20: Effects of Ordinance. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is, fcr any reason, held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. City Council declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, sub -section, sentence, clause er phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more of the section, sub -section, sentence, clause or declare'.' unconstitutional or otherwiseinvalid. ODUCF.D at a regular so ou__.ed day of 1991. Cou7;ci MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a .regular mee tina of said Ci.'y Council duly held on the day oL 1991. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: council Members Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Attorney SJCPKFEE.DOC 2/4/91 - 9 (-')-1.4 554 FAX 41, ' ;."2. „ • ' ACH'q aC 3 LU-11 San Jacinto Fire Department MEMO March 28, 1991 TO: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager/ FROM: Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief /7 SUBJECT: Weed Abatement Hearing Continuation to April 16 1991 The healing t(., voie concerns on the weed abatement piugram (Resolution No. 1940) needs to be continued from the City Council meeting of April 2, 1991 to the April 16, 1991 City Council meeting. This is due to the fact the Fire Department has not mailed out the notices in the proper time. We have had a problem getting the mailing labels finished. We need to mail out the notices at least five days before the hearing. We will have plenty of time before the April 16th meeting. i1s12, IQol lt%eed.Abaterrrent Resolution - Resolution_ No. f 450 RESOLUTION NO.1950 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, OVERRULING OBJECI IONS AND DETERMINING TO PROCEED WITH ABATEMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ASSEMBLED IN REGULAR SESSION THIS 2nd DAY OF APRIL, 1991 DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: The City Council adopted Resolution No. 1940 on March 19, 1991, which by its terms the Council elected to proceed under Government Code Sections 39501-39588 and did declare as a public nuisance all weeds growing upon streets, sidewalks and private property in the City all rubbish, refuse and dirt upon parkways, sidewalks and private property; and A public, hearing was held on April 2, 199i, and objections to the proposed removal of weeds, rubbish, refuse and dirt were made or presented either in writing or orally; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS FOUND, DETERMINED AND ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: The foregoing is true. 2. The City Council fixed April 2, 1991 at the hour of 7:30 p.;n. o'clock in the Council Chambers, as the time and place for hearing all objections to the proposed removal of weeds, rubbish, refuse and dirt, and the Fire Chief was designated as the person to perform the duties imposed by Government Code sections 39560-39588 upon the superintendent, and he did prepare notices to destroy and remove rubbish, refuse and dirt; the City did mail written notice of the proposed abatement to all persons owning property described in Resolution No. 1940 in the time, folr:t and manner prescribed by Or Oral l) Co$cd on A Tit City hold a nut "Grose:.; removal of weeds. r !. 16, 1991. --. 1991 and 1 lions e u 1; dud wore presentL. . ano the has he noxious and/or dangerous 'weds aro-wine in or upon or a< latent to real nroperry a sci bed in Resolution No 1940 are seasonal and recurrent nuisances, The Superintendents ordered to abate i.he ;: e.,s ir.c._ declared br r soiui_ sI , o. 1 940 by thavirig tile weeds, rubbish1, refuse arJ dirt removed. and for loos purpose to Si uennielidenl - .'._",, enter upon private property to abate the nuisance, and the Superintendent is ordered to CIUSe the abatemer_i o1 the weeds from tithe -to -time hereafter as the weeds recur per section 139562.1 of the Government Code. Before the Superintendent arrives, any property owner may remove the weeds, rubbish, refuse and dirt at his own expense. 6. The Superintendent or the contractor awarded the work, as the case may be, shall keep an account of the cost of abatement in front of or on each separate parcel of land where the work is done and modification and confirmation, an itemized written report showing this cost, all as more particularly described by Government Code section 39574. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and cause it 10 he published pursuant to law. April2, 1991 Weed Abate mcn r Resolution - Resol u 1950 MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: A 1 I EST: day of April 1991 by the following vote: Deputy City clerk CERTIFICATE Mayor The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. 1950 duly adopted by the said Ciro Council of the city of San Jacinto on the date set fort therein. ✓Clint'✓ Cit' L;cr:: REVISED I-G AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA AND SAN JACINTO FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION; SAN JACINTO POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION; PUBLIC EMPLOYEES OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY; AND SAN JACINTO MANAGEMENT AND CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES. This agreement is executed this 2 day of April, 1991 for the purpose of amending that certain Memorandum of Understanding between the City of San Jacinto and the San Jacinto Firefighters Association, Police Association, Public Employees of Riverside County and Management and Confidential Employees. IT IS HEREBY AGREED that ARTICLE V - BENEFITS Paragraph 5.6 of Fire and Police Association and Paragraph 4.8 of Miscellaneous Association Memoranda of Understanding be added and read as follows: 5.6 FITNESS PROGRAM: From April 1 through July 31, 1991, the City will pay on behalf of full-time regular employees 1. The sum of $3 per visit per employee to the Hemet Fitness Center. It is a take -it or leave -it benefit and will not be reimbursed or compensated to employees who do not use the facilities. 2. This program is on a trial basis only, and will be reviewed and evaluated at the end of the 4 month period, unless otherwise extended by subsequent written agreement, this amendment to the various MOU's shall expire and shall be of no further force and affect on August 1, 1991.. Amendment - Page 2 3. There are no guarantees that this program will be continued at the end of the trial period or at the level offered during the trial period. Continuance will be evaluated by, but not limited to, the following factors: USE, BUDGET CONSTRAINTS AND FEEDBACK ON THE PROGRAM; 4. The purpose of the unlimited visits during the trial period is to help determine use patterns. This unlimited level is not guaranteed to be continued; 5. A hold harmless agreement (waiver of responsibility from the City) will need to be signed by the employees who plan to use the facilities; 6. The facilities will not be used during working hours; 7. A City employee identification card will be required to be shown at each visit, so that the use can be billed to the City appropriately. 8. Funding for this trial period will come from the Management and Confidential annual physical exam allowance from the 1990-91 fiscal year. Management and Confidential employees have agreed to waive this allowance only for the 1990-91 fiscal year. 2 Amendment - Page 3 AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Resolution No. 1785, Management and Confidential Employees Paragraph C. MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS be replaced and read as 5.6 above. CITY OF SAN JACINTO SAN JACINTO ASSOCIATIONS By: By: City Manager Firefighters Association By: By: Mayor Police Association By: By: 3 Miscellaneous PERC Assoc. Management Group MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Anna Vega, Finance Director March 29, 1991 FITNESS PROGRAM 11(7:1t7,77.J.1, "Lij 'j• As you'll recall, the Employee Programs Committee has been meeting to develop various employee oriented programs. One of the proposed programs is a trial period fitness program. It has been documented in medical journals that programs such as these help alleviate stress in the work place. As proposed, the program would be through the Hemet Racquetball Center and would be billed on an "as - used" basis of $3.00 per visit, per employee. The City would receive a bill each month, listing the usage, which would be paid out of the liability account. In this proposed initial four month trial period, use would be unlimited so that the Committee and Staff could determine/evaluate use patterns. The Management Employee Group has unanimously agreed to waive their claim to the annual physical compensation in order to provide funds for this proposed trial basis fitness program to all City employees. The City of San Jacinto will not be held liable in case of an injury or accident while using the fitness center. A hold harmless agreement will be required to be signed by those employees using the facility which is being paid directly by the City to the Hemet Racquetball Fitness Center. This program is a take -it or leave -it benefit and employees who choose not to use the facility, will receive no benefit or compensation. This program is on a trial basis only and will be evaluated at the end of four months. Recommendation: Council approve the attached proposed amendment to the Memorandum of Understandings for each of the employee groups. AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANPING BETWEEN CITY OF SAN JACINTO, O, CALIFORNIA ANID SAN JACINTO FIREETCH 'FS 9:=SOCIeTION. SAN JACINTO PO ICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION PUBLIC EMPLOYEES OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY; AND SAN JACINTO MANAGEMENT AND CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES This agreement iv executed this 2 day of April. 1991 for the purpose of amending that certain Memorandum of Understanding between the City of San Jacinto and the San Jacinto Firefighter sssc.elation, Police Association, Pi.blic Employees of Riverside County and Management and Confidential Employees. IT IS HEREBY AGREED that ARTICLE V - BENEFITS Paragraph 5.6 of Fire, Police and Mi :Cellanecus Associatie:ns, Memoranda of Understanding be added and read as follows: FITNESS PROGRAM: From April 1 through July 31, 1991, the City will pay on behalf of full - employee; Th e Fitness 0i per visit per emplo It is a take -it or r,e Hemet beI1efit. an& will not be reimbursed er. compensated to employees who do not, use the facilities 2. This program is a trial basis only, and will be reviewed and evaluated at the end of the 4 month period. 3 There are no PA-" Pt y�c (co. guarantee. that this pro continued at the end of the trail period level offered during the trial perioc. lI be or at the 1}S n 7 Contini be evaluated y, but not to, the following factors: AND FEEDBACK ON THE PROGRAM; The purpose of the unlimited visits during the period is to help determine BUDGET CONSTRAINTS patterns. This unlimited level .is not guaranteed to be continued; A hold harmless agreement (waiver of responsibility from City) will need to be signed by the employees who Man to use the facilities; The, facilities will not be used during working hours; A City employee identification card will be required T.C> be shown at can be pilled to th City appropriately. Funding for this trial period ;:ill come from tY1e I4aniagement and C=_'nfidential annual physical exam allowance from the 1890-91 fiscal year. Management and Confidential employ ave agreed to waive this; allowance only for the 1990-91 fiscal year. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Resolution 1785, Management and Confidential Employees Paragraph C. MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS be replaced and read as 5.6 above. CITY OF SAN JACINTO SAN JACINTO ASSOCIATIONS By: Cii gager iV : By: By: Firefighters A_tiociation Mayor Police Association By: MdFcellaneous PER O Assoc. Management Group AGEilDA MINUTES San Jacinto City Council and the Council Sitting as the Redevelopment AGency and Industrial Development Authority Regular Adjourned Meeting 19 March 1991 The regular meeting of the San Jacinto City Council, the Council sitting as the Redevelopment Agency and Industrial Development Authority was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Mayor Boykin at the Community Center, 625;S. Pico Avenue. Roll Call'- Present: Councilmen Boykin, Ford, Hafliger, and Leahy.. Councilman Rose excused EXECUTIVE SESSION Potential Litigation & Real Property Transaction (Possible property transactions at southeast corner of San Jacinto and Esplanade Avenues to negotiate with Hopkins Development Co.) Motion by Councilman Ford to go into Executive Session for discussion of Potential Litigation and Property Transactions at 6:31 p.m. Seconded by Councilwoman Motion carried: 4-0. Motion by Councilman Ford eahy to return to Regular Session at 7:39 p.m. Seconded by Councilman Hafliger. Motion carried: 4-0 Let the record show that no Executive Session. 3-19-91 Minutes Page 2 ZI CONSENT CALENDAR A Approval of. Minutes of March 5 and 8, 1991. B Approval of Warrant Nos. 24504 through.24695, as submitted by the Finance Director. C. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1943 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, designating a City consultant as the authorized City representative to examine sales and use tax records. (Staff recommends approval.) D. Ordinance for Adoption - Ordinance No. 931 An Ordinance of the Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, designating Truck Routes within the City. (Staff recommends approval.) E Amendment for Adoption - Amendment to Resolution No. 1785, providing a terns life insurance policy for each management and confidential employee, effective March 1, 1991. (City Attorney recommends approval.) Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1946 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto recognizing the Riverside County Law Enforcement Museum as an authorized repository for City of San Jacinto historical materials relating to law enforcement and public safety. (Staff recommends approval.): SafekLeping and Trading Account Agree iert . (Staff recommends approval.) Authorization to reduce the performance bond to a 10% maintenance bond for a 1-year period and release the street improvement bond in accordance with State Law. Also release survey monument bond: Tract No, 25099 Applicant: P.A. Cassel Location: Vernon and Second Street (Staff recommends approval) Financial Activity Reports for period ending February 28, 1991, as submitted by the Finance Director. (Receive and file. 3-19-91 Page 3 Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1945 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of. San Jacinto declaring its intention to initiate on its own motion proceedings to annex certain inhabited territory known as Annexation No. 70 Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1944 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, acknowledging April 1-5, 1991 as National Community Development Week. Release of funds from Main St. Renovation Loan Program. (Staff and City Treasurer recommend approval;) M,..Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda pursuant to City Attorney. Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development requested an amendment to Item II-H, stating that Staff recommends Council accept street improvements at this time, release the Performance Bond and substitute with an $8,000 Maintenance Bond. Item F. Councilwoman Leahy inquired if there would be a cost to participating in the Riverside County Law Enforcement Museum. Chief Kozma stated that only the donation of items of a historical nature, i.e; documents, equipment will be given for the Museum. Item I. Councilwoman Leahy inquired if we had a specific inspection officer that is going out and making fines? Councilwoman was referring to Account No. 10-0320 (Other Code Fines) and the difference between the estimated revenue and to -date revenue. Finance Director Vega explained that this code enforcement is done by the County in the form of abatement of vehicles, etc, and they are about three months behind in forwarding our portion of the collected revenues. Councilwoman Leahy inquired if there was a special program to encourage citizens to get dog licenses. Chief Kozma advised that the Animal Control Department sections the City into four quarters and they have the Animal Control Officer physically check for dog licenses. In addition, they encourage residents adopting animals from the Animal Haven, that live in the City, to buy a license right at the Haven. We do have education programs that we hold at the Community Center also 3-19-91 Minutes Page 4, Item K. Councilwoman Leahy asked how the list of participants will be compiled and who will put the program together"? City Manager Easter relayed that this is a yearly recognition that is handled at the County level and they ask us to adopt a resolution, but they put the program on. Most years they do posters and have events that are coordinated on a County wide basis. Our support is requested in the form of a Resolution. Mayor Boykin added that he would be attending an event at the Riverside Mall on April 4, 1991, at which time this Resolution will be presented. Motion by Councilman Ford to approve consent calendar items A through M, including amendment to Item H, adopt Resolution Nos. 1943, 1944, 1945, 1946 and Ordinance No. 931 and waive the readings in full. Seconded by Councilwoma Motion carried: 4-0 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued from March 5, 1991) Environmental Impact Assessment and General Plan Amendment 1-91 Applicant: North Mountain Partners Location: approximately 1,116 acres located in the. San Jacinto Mountains north of Soboba Road, occupying Sections 13 and 14 and portions of Sections 16 and 23. Proposal to amend the Land Use Element of the. General Plan from Hillside to Specific Plan Area. . Environmental Impact Assessment and Change of Zone 2-91 Applicant: North Mountain Partners Location: same as "A" above Proposal for pre -annexation Zone Change to W-2, Controlled Development on the subject property. Presentation by Brian McNabb, Community Development Director relaying that the intent is to create an interim General Plan and Zoning designation for the purpose of expediting the annexation` application, 3-19-91 Minutes Page 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont'd) so that it can be processed concurrently with the North Mountain/Soboba Summit Specific Plan and the associated environmental impact report. At the last meeting, the City Attorney expressed some concerns regarding the environmental review and the Council continued the matter and asked Staff to seek additional information in terms of the environmental review. Council also requested some information regarding the existing surface mining permit that is being conducted by Fontana Paving along Soboba Road. The Staff report provided to Council explains the annexation process - the steps involved and the approximate time it takes. It also goes into the Specific Plan and EIR process that Mr. Morgan will have to go through and the approximate time that will take. With the assumption that an environmental impact report is not necessary for the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change, annexation could not take place any earlier than approximately February 1, 1992. A specific plan and EIR process that could be running concurrently would take approximately eight months. The "fast track" process is common for all jurisdictions for those projects it finds beneficial in one way or another, whether its an economic development program, where you're encouraging a small business, etc. or an industry to come in because of the amount of projected employment or a housing project because somehow it enhances the City in some manner. In regard to the CEQ question, Staff consulted the City Attorney and other attorneys that specialize in environmental law as to what their opinion was, the risk involved to the City in any decision we make whether it be a negative declaration or requiring an environmental impact report. Both attorneys indicated that an EIR is the most correct way to proceed. It boils down to whether the Council feels the project is of substantial enough benefit to justify being put on the fast track, weighing all the circumstances - the benefits, the risks, etc. 3-19-91 Minutes Page 6 If Council desires to continue with the fast track, Staff's recommendation would be to continue with the public hearing from tonight to April 16, to allow Staff to prepare a more in depth environmental discussion for Council's information, so that upon the completion of the consideration of the negative declaration, the action of the Council would be a negative declaration with mitigating measures. The intent of that would be to identify all known environmental concerns, discuss them and come up with potential mitigating measures. If the Council does not desire to fast track the project, it should table these two (2) items until the time the environmental impact report has been completed for sperific plan. The surface mining permit along Soboba Road is in noncompliance with the Conditions of Approval as follows: 1. The grading of hillside, where mining has been completed, is not in conformance with the Uniform Building Code, which requires a bench in the slope to be cut at every 30 ft. of rise in vertical elevation. 2. The finished hillside has not been hydroseeded for erosion control. (Mr. Morgan has not performed this task because he was awaiting a resolution to Item No. 1, above. 3. Security guaranteeing the reclamation (seeding of the slopes has not been provided. This is also contingent on Item No. 1, above. There are three basic ways in which the surface mining operation can be brought into compliance: 1. The existing slope can be hydroseeded; and the applicant can post a reclamation bond to guarantee the survival of the hydroseed for 12 months. 6 3-19-91 Minutes Page 7 PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont'd) 2. The new conditional use permit, which calls for the expansion of the surface mining permit to the east and also conforms to the recommendation of applicant's geologist in terms of benching and the elimination of the dangerous vertical slope, can be allowed to proceed. If the new conditional use permit is granted, the grading work will be completed as soon as possible; the reseeding will be finished; and, security will be posted. 3. The City can determine the lack of benching and the existence of the vertical slope are merely an elimination of a safety problem and order applicant (Mr. Morgan) to immediately correct the safety problem; reseed the new slope; and, provide security for the viability of the planting. Councilman Hafliger inquired if the conditional use permit issued by the County in compliance with the use permit? Mr. McNabb responded that, based on some enforcement the City was involved in the early 80's, no. Councilman Hafliger stated that he felt to put this project on any kind of a fast track, or even a slow track, he felt it should be put on a stop track until the conditions are met. With the conditional use permit out of compliance, Councilman Hafliger stated he does not understand why the City accepted that property for annexation into the City. He further stated that he feels compliance needs to be met before the City gives anymore go ahead on the annexation. Councilman Ford inquired if it was correct that Fontana Paving was not in compliance at this time. Mr. McNabb stated that was correct. Mr. Ford further asked if Mr. Morgan was working with Fontana to try to get them to get that under control. Mr. McNabb verified that was true. Councilwoman Leahy inquired how many 100 foot slopes there were. Mrs. Leahy thought previously that all that was required to bring them into compliance was to hydroseed. Mr. McNabb verified that if the slope exceeds 100 ft. it must be benched. 7 3-19-91 Minutes Page 8 Councilman Hafliger expressed a concern in the aesthetic value of the hillside, stating that allowing the applicant to correct the roadway problem would increase the aesthetic deterioration of the mountain. Councilman Hafliger further stated that he feels more study needs to be done on the benching. Councilwoman Leahy stated she wanted to see this project come to be, but would like to proceed without the City being at high risk. Mayor Boykin advised that the Public Hearing was still open and invited Mr. Morgan, the applicant, to respond. Mr. Morgan stated that the Conditional Use Permit was in compliance when annexed into City and that the scar on the mountain was done three weeks before the property was purchased by he and his partners. Mr. Morgan further stated that the non-compliance issues occurred before he was involved with the property and that he was not aware of any areas of non-compliance that he could resolve since he purchased the property. He also said that the sand and gravel operation must be continued to allow accomplishment of the project and the project must be fast tracked for the project to proceed. Councilwoman Leahy asked Mr. Morgan if there were any slopes over 100 ft.? Mr. Morgan stated yes and that the geologists advise there is no stability problem. He does not feel they are ruining the mountain with the grading plan. Mayor Boykin inquired what the differences between the new CUP and the current CUP are. Mr. Mr. McNabb stated that the two differences are: (1) requesting more cut into the hillside and (2) longer length of running operation time. Mr. Morgan stated that he did not know how long it would take to get to grade, but the intent has not changed, and the mining will cease when they get to grade. Mr. Morgan further stated that the geologist 8 3-19-91 Minutes Page 9 recommends taking steep slopes and benching, which was not part of our original grading plan. Councilman Hafliger questioned how the road on the face of the mountain would be masked so not to be see all over the Valley. Mr. Morgan stated that the scar will be used as the base of the highway and that the highway road (pavement) will be illuminated and landscaped with shrubbery. Councilwoman Leahy asked if the Pointe people had proposed a contract with North Mountain. Mr. Morgan advised that they had not. Mr. Ford inquired if there had been any contact with Lockheed to use the road through Lambs Canyon, if feasible. Mr. Morgan advised that no response had been made from Lockheed as they were negotiating to sell all 9000 acres. Mr. Hafliger stated the hard question was if Mr. Morgan has been out of compliance for a number of years, now he's asking the Council to consider a landscaped road to make it aesthetic, why would he think Mr. Morgan would do that when he's been out of compliance for two years or longer. Mr. Morgan stated that he had not been out of compliance by choice. The out of compliance issues were known but could not be addressed until geological studies were finished. Mr. Morgan further stated that some of the problems were of the City's creation. Mr. Morgan further stated that the two projects need to be separated and that the City must decide if they do not want the mountain top project in the City, make that decision, but if it is being held up because of the mining operation, there is a probability the partners will not go forward with it. Mrs. Leahy asked to verify the staff report that states that if there is an issue that arises, Mr. Morgan had agreed to indemnify the City regarding attorney fees, and asked if he would be willing to put that in writing. Mr. Morgan stated he would. 9 3-19-91 Minutes Page 10 Mayor Boykin stated that he supports the project at the top of the mountain, but not sure he supports the access up the mountain. Mr. McNabb advised that the environmental impact report has to consider other alternatives and the road up the mountain may not be the recommendation of the EIR. Mayor Boykin recommended acting on Staff's recommendation and continuing to April 16, 1991 to get additional input re the Conditional Use Permit, geologist report and Council being furnished information at that time. Motion by Councilman Ford to adopt Resolution No. 1942 and waive the reading in full. Mr. McNabb advised that if it is the Council's desire to grant a consider a negative declaration, Staff's recommendation is that the Public Hearing be continued open until the meeting of April 16, 1991, to allow Staff to prepare a comprehensive negative declaration with mitigating measures so you can analyze all of those issues prior to making a final decision on zone change and General Plan amendment. Councilman Ford stated that he would personally like to go ahead and move the Resolution and then when the environmental impact report is available, then go with keeping it open. Mr. McNabb advised that the Council would have the prerogative to go ahead with that as there is a negative declaration involved in both the Resolution as well as the Ordinance. Mayor Boykin relayed to City Attorney Cox that a motion was being made concerning adopting the Resolution and Staff advised that by Council continuing this to April 16, 1991, and possibly coming up with the negative declaration and mitigating measures, that this would not jeopardize things as you had previously indicated at our last meeting. City Attorney Cox advised that he feels the risk would be substantially reduced if the decision would 10 3-19-91 Minutes Page 11 be delayed for a month to allow Staff to prepare a negative declaration which addresses the mitigation, etc., with the environmental concerns raised in the assessment report. Councilman Ford withdrew his motion. Councilman Hafliger asked if it were true that in a negative declaration that lead agency has made a determination that a project will not have a significant impact on the environment. Is this correct? City Attorney Cox advised basically yes, but you can do a mitigated negative declaration, which is what Staff is proposing. There is still a risk even with the mitigated declaration, but reduced substantially. Councilman Hafliger stated he is opposed to continuing this project as long as there is a problem with the mining. He further stated that compliance needs to be addressed first. Mr. McNabb advised that there is a little bit of engineering work that has to be done to determine whether that slope is greater than 100 feet or not. If it's not, then Mr. Morgan could come into compliance in the next 30 days, while Staff is preparing this mitigated declaration for your consideration. Even if Council says they are not interested in pursuing the North Mountain Project altogether, the issue of the non-compliance is still existent, and Mr. Morgan will have to do at least steps one or two. Mayor Boykin suggested that Council act on Staff's recommendation as far as continuing to April 16, but at the same time that we get additional input as far as the CUP and the City's geologist report and then at that time. 11 3-19-91 Minutes Page 12 Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to continue Public Hearing to April 16, 1991, and direct Staff to prepare a comprehensive negative declaration with mitigating measures, if possible, and update on Conditional Use Permit at the same meeting. Seconded by Mayor Boykin. Motion carried: 4-0. IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS A. Request for appeal - sprinkler system - Cottonwood Partners Councilman Hafliger excused himself from the meeting due to possible conflict of interest. Ross Chadwick relayed to Council that the sprinkler ordinance mandates that permits and plans must be pulled within one year of paying fees and also added that the Cottonwood Partners project was outside the five minute response time Jim Fain, General Manager, Cottonwood Partners, stated that he believed his project was within the time frame as the fees were paid in February, 1990, map recorded October, 1990 and loans recorded on February 1, 1991. Mr. Fain advised that it would cost an additional $50,000 to $100,000 to add sprinklers to the project. Councilwoman Leahy inquired in the project fell under the time frame allowed in the ordinance? Ross Chadwick advised that the plans were submitted prior to the ordinance being in effect. Mayor Boykin advised that City Manager Easter requested this matter be continued to March 26, 1991. Mayor Boykin directed Staff to prepare report for March 26, 1991 agenda and receive input from Ross Chadwick. Councilman Hafliger returned. 12 3-19-91 Minutes Page 13 V. CITY DEPARTMENTS A. Water Conservation and other Related Issues - Pamela Easter City Manager Easter relayed that she had requested from Water Superintendent John Townsel his recommendations on water conservation as the area is experiencing a dry year. The issue is more than just conservation and takes in issues such as the City's water district, source of water supply, Staff's report of that water and the aquifer the City draws from, as well as, to provide recommendations on water conservation and other recommendations on a need to look at water rates, charges and installation requirements, some current maintenance needs and additionally dealing with the longer range issue of retaining our water basins, quality water basins, and a recommendation that, if formed, we participate in a proposed Water Pumper's Association for the Valley. Council requested Mr. Townsel provide additional input at this time. Mr. Townsel provided Council with an update on the recent valley water providers meeting held last week, including EMWD, Lake Hemet, City of Hemet and the City of San Jacinto. John provided Council with a history of domestic water use, City well site pumping capacities, history of static water levels at each well site since drilled, as well as a program of water conservation to be undertaken by the City. The conservation program will include community awareness, voluntary water conservation, new conservation related water rates, water awareness at local elementary schools and final development of existing facilities. Mr. Townsel further advised that Staff would bring back water rate recommendations to Council in two weeks. Mr. Townsel advised Council that our citizenry has voluntarily made a 20% reduction in water usage. A letter of thank you and a request for continued conservation will be sent to the citizenry very shortly. City Manager Easter further advised that the City was looking into expanding our computer capabilities as regards developing a history by service account. In summation, Ms. Easter stated the following Staff recommendations: 13 3-19-91 Minutes Page 14 1. Approve a voluntary water conservation program, with a goal of 10% based on 1990 water usage. Authorize an expenditure of up to $7500.00 to implement a water conservation education program, including a focus on school children. (includes a City wide mailer). 2. Request the Staff to submit recommendations to the Council on water rates, installation charges, and the requirement to place separate water meters in each unit at upcoming Council meetings. 3. Request the Staff to go out to bid on the necessary Mistletoe Well maintenance work as well as the purchase and installation of motor and equipment for the new Bath Well. Also authorize going out to bid for the completion of a Water Master Plan. 4. Support the City's participation in the Valley Water Pumpers' Association, if formed. Councilwoman Leahy stated that in view of the fact that Council has been made aware of all the education material available and there is a program ongoing in the school, the figure of $7500 could be reduced. Councilman Hafliger stated that the numerous educational programs presented at the schools requires considerable funding and that the Council should take a good look before suggesting another program for the school and that we can help fund the program. City Manager Easter advised that the $7500.00 included the cost of the materials for the school and the City was not requesting any funds from the School District be used. 14 3-19-91 Minutes Page 15 Motion by Councilman Ford to approve Staff recommendations one through four (1-4). Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to reduce item 1 to $5000.00 (died for lack of second.) Seconded by Mayor Boykin, adding that whatever amount is approved that Staff will be conservative with the educational material costs. Motion carried: 4-0. B. Update on The Villas Water - John Townsel The Villas pipeline is all installed and we are currently waiting for bacteria report to be returned from lab, which will hopefully be a satisfactory reading tomorrow. We can then put it in service immediately. C. Selection of Paramedic Committee - Ross Chadwick Ross Chadwick requested this item be delayed until April 2, 1991, to include other agencies (County Health Department, Hemet Valley Hospital and the State agency), together with Hemet Valley Ambulance (who has already responded affirmatively). D. Weed Abatement Report and Resolution - Ross Chadwick Ross Chadwick thanked the Weed Abatement Committee for their hard work. Motion by Councilman Hafliger, to adopt Resolution No. 1940, declaring all rubbish and refuse upon specified streets and private property within said City to be public nuisances and all weeds growing upon specified streets and private property within said City to be seasonal and recurrent public nuisances and declaring its intention to remove and abate the same under and in accordance with the provisions of Title 4, Division 3, Part 2, Chapter 13, Article 2, of the Government Code and waive the reading in full. Seconded by Councilman Ford. Motion carried: 4-0. 15 3-19 91 Minutes Page 16 E. Mid Year Budget Review - Anna Vega Presentation by Anna Vega, Finance Director. Ms. Vega advised Council of several items impacting the budget: 1. The 1990-91 budget was adopted with a deficit of $70,908. 2. Salary increase approved by Council for all City employees, but not included in adopted budget. 3. AB2557 allows the County to charge the City $10,000 for property tax collection and $45,000 for Police booking fees. Additionally, Ms. Vega advised that building related revenues are down by about 38% of adopted estimated revenues. Ms. Vega has made a thorough review of expenditures and cut backs were made where possible. This also included transfer of employee's compensation to funds other than the General Fund, where applicable. The City Manager and Finance Director have recommended to Department Heads to delay any hiring/promotions until May 1 or when a review of incoming revenue is done to ensure funds will be available. The one exception is the Public Works Director which is currently anticipated to be filled by mid May. About 40% of the director's salary will be charged outside of the general fund. Staff's recommendation to Council tonight is to allow: 1. Staff to conduct a study to identify potential user fees that could be charged for various City services, including utilities (water and sewer). Bring back a recommended consultant to assist in conducting the study. 2. Conduct a study to audit sales tax receipts to ensure that the City is receiving proper sales tax revenues. 3. Request Staff to develop request for proposals to develop a master plan for future infrastructure, park, traffic and any needs of the City and the impact fees that are required to provide these needs. 16 3-19-91 Minutes Page 17 4. Request Staff to submit a recommended increase in planning processing fees to provide for necessary planning staff. This will be before Council, hopefully, by April 16, 1991. Finance Director Vega advised that in meeting with the Administrative Council Subcommittee (Councilmen Boykin and Ford), it was the Committee's request that Council consider a minimum of 5% be allotted to go into general fund reserves in the upcoming budget year. Councilwoman Leahy inquired if the cutbacks would bring the budget to a balanced position or are we still 'talking a deficit. Finance Director Vega advised that we are still talking a deficit balance, but hopefully with building permits coming back this month we will find ourselves at a positive or at least a zero balance. City Manager Easter stated that the turndown in the economy affected many cities in the State and we are all experiencing this. She further advised that some cities have been forced to lay off people, as well as cut positions. San Jacinto has tried to cut expenditures every way they can short of laying people off, so that has been the tone underlying the subject memorandum. We also want to look at how we can increase revenues in the next 3-6 months. Motion by Councilman Hafliger to the mid -year proposed amendments be approved as submitted, and authorize Staff to proceed with the revenue enhancement strategies, by studies as required. Seconded by Councilman Ford. Motion carried: 4-0. F. Main Street Committee Update - Joe Kozma As Chief Kozma had to leave, Brian McNabb, advised that Joe Kozma directed a meeting of interested or affected parties related to the 5-Points signalization as well as interaction with the streets that feed into the 5-Points intersection. The meeting was held last week with Council members, Cal Trans and various business organization representatives as well as the San Jacinto Parking Lot Association representative. The history of the situation was reviewed related to both Highway 79 17 3-19-91 Minutes Page 18 and grant funds that were available through FAU (Federal Aid Urban Program). Highway 79 comes through the City of San Jacinto, across river at State Street Bridge, down State Street to Ramona Blvd., Ramona Blvd to San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto Avenue to Florida Avenue. There has been interest from the Valley expressed to Cal Trans in the past as far as redesignating Hwy 79 through some other alternate routing. Input from the meeting was that San Jacinto had resisted in the past due to concerns that they might get stuck with having to reconstruct a sub -standard bridge across the San Jacinto River, as well as, inheriting sub -standard roadway that exists up on various sections of State Highway. Some of the positives to San Jacinto are, from having Highway 79 designation removed, it would make the approval process enhanced in terms of development along San Jacinto Avenue. Cal Trans would be taken completely out of the project review. Cal Trans suggested redesignating the Highway with a Business District designation, which would entail Cal Trans putting up and maintaining signs that say, Highway 79 Business District, but they would not maintain pavement or highway maintenance. The Highway would then be designated at a different location. Staff recommends Council authorize a study to be completed by Cal Trans as to the feasibility of relocating SR 79. The study would provide all projects with the realignment and any funding anticipations including any loss of funding for San Jacinto as a result of realignment. Motion by Councilman Hafliger to authorize Mayor to send a letter requesting Cal Trans to take the lead in performing a feasibility study to relocate State Route 79 from its present alignment to an alignment on Sanderson Avenue. The study consideration should also consider a "business route" through San Jacinto, bridge acquisition at the State Street crossing of the San Jacinto River, signalization at 5-Points, disposition of the old bridge, any funding impacts, and timeliness associated with each study area. City Manager Easter inquired if Council wanted Staff to have an independent consultant do a study for us that would include the aspect by Cal Trans. Since Cal Trans is a key ingredient in this, Staff is wondering if Council would want to bring in someone that would incorporate Cal Trans aspects, with an independent view looking at the effects of 18 3-19-91 Agenda Page 19 transferring 79 from its current alignment over to Sanderson, in terms of the economic impact, as well as, other monetary requirements. Motion amended to read ...to study feasibility of hiring a consultant to take the lead in performing a feasibility study in relocating State Route 79. Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 4-0. Motion by Councilman Hafliger to authorize Staff to seek bids for a Citywide traffic engineering study to review traffic circulation and provide recommendations for future traffic patterns and roadway designations. This motion does not include Annexation 66 are other than roadway width and alignments where necessary. City Manager Easter advised that at the current time the City does not have an updated circulation plan and this motion will be very beneficial. Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 4-0. Motion by Councilman Hafliger to authorize Staff to hire a consultant or consultants to begin a study of off-street parking sites in the area bounded by State Street on the west, Ramona Expressway on the north, Esplanade Avenue on the south and Camino Los Banos on the east and consideration of parallel parking vs. diagonal parking on Main Street. This study shall be incorporated as part of the Citywide study. Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 3-1 (Ford abstaining). Councilman Hafliger brought up a fourth motion that has to do with restriping the parking on Main Street in the 100 and 200 block. Motion by Councilman Hafliger to change the designation of parking on the 100 and 200 block of Main Street until citywide traffic engineering study has been completed and Staff prepare a Resolution for consideration to present potential for angle parking at the April 2 meeting. 19 3-19-91 Minutes Page 20 Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy. otion'carried: 4- VI, MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER-REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS A, Scripps Clinic Update - Councilman; Hafliger Councilman Hafliger advised that FHP would be the health care provider, effective June or July, at Scripps Clinic. B. Housing for Independent People (HIP)-(Vosburg Project) - Councilman Hafliger Councilman Hafliger prepared memo to. HIP asking a number of questions for HIP to answer: Staff is awaiting a response from HIP for their requested time of presentation. C. Proclamation celebrating the Peace Corps 30th Year Mayor Boykin D. Acceptance of Donation of Gazebo for Hofmann Park from the Hofmann Family and waiver of fees for construction permit Mayor Pro Tem Ford Councilman Ford shared a shop drawing of the proposed gazebo donation with Council and staff. Motion by Councilman Ford to accept gazebo as a donation from the Hofmann Family and waive fees for permits. Seconded by. Councilman Hafliger. Motion carried: 4 -0 .. Councilwoman Leahy requested an 'update ,on the residence at the southwest corner of Shaver & Hewitt. City Manager Easter advised that the house belonged to the State and Staff would send a report out to Council on the status. Councilwoman Leahy advised that the back side of the City sign on Ramona Expressway at Potter needs painting. 20 3-19-91 Agenda Page 21 Councilwoman Leahy stated she would like to send a Certificate of Appreciation, on behalf of the City, to Rice Young Development for their concerns about the community in donating two heaters to the San Jacinto Valley School of the Arts. Councilman Ford relayed to Council that Mayor Boykin had requested he represent the City of San Jacinto on April 22, 1991, at the Santa Anita Race Track for the running of the "San Jacinto Handicap". Councilman Hafliger expressed a clarification on who the Certificates of Appreciation will be sent to. City Manager Easter requested clarification on who would be issuing the certificates, the Council person requesting the certificate or the Mayor. Mayor Boykin stated he hadno preference and if the individual council member wanted to do this, he had no objection. Mayor Boykin brought up the evaluation of the City Manager and requested a decision be made as to what form should be used to accomplish this evaluation and start the process going. Councilman Hafliger suggested asking Councilwoman Leahy to come up with a format and use it and anybody with any input contact her and expedite it and Mayor Boykin call a meeting to when Council can go over the evaluation. Mayor Boykin requested a decision on the format to be used. He additionally expressed a preference to the prior form used and ask each Council Member to complete an independent evaluation and then call an Executive Session to go over this and also ask the City Manager to fill out an evaluation of her self and then after the Council does their combined work in an Executive Session, Council gets together with the City Manager and go over the evaluation with her. Councilman Hafliger requested putting a timeline on it and getting it completed before the Mayor goes to Russia. 21 3-19-91 Minutes Page 22 Councilwoman Leahy advised that the League had informed that the appraisal was a two-step process and that the participants discuss the expectations that exist against which performance will be measured. Councilwoman Leahy volunteered to incorporate the goals and objectives gathered at the recent retreat along with those of the City Manager. Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to adjourn to March 26, 1991 at 6:30 p.m. to a joint meeting with the Planning Commission at the Community Center. Seconded by Councilman Ford. Motion carried 4-0 at 10:55 p.m. Approved by: Maurice Armster City Clerk 22 Respectfully submitted, Nancy Randolph Deputy City Clerk MINUTES San Jacinto City Council and the Council Sitting as the Redevelopment Agency and Industrial Development Authority Special Meeting 26 March 1991 The special joint meeting of the San Jacinto City Council, the Council sitting as the Redevelopment Agency and Industrial Development Authority and the Planning Commission was called to order at 6:31 p.m. by Mayor Boykin at the Community Center, 625 S. Pico Avenue. Roll Call - Present: Councilmen Boykin, Ford, Hafliger, and Leahy. Absent: Councilman Rose excused Present: Planning Commissioners Taylor, Rutledge, Hixson, Iacono and Ver Plank Staff Members - City Manager Easter, Community Development Director McNabb, Finance Director Vega, Police Chief Kozma, Fire Chief Chadwick, Asst. City Manager Garcia, Water Superintendent Townsel and City Attorney Cox. Moment of Silence for Reflection. Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Boykin. I. PUBLIC HEARING - Planning Commission A. Environmental Impact Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 3-91 Applicant: SJV Development, Inc. Location: west of the realignment of Potter Road, approximately 625 feet north of the Ramona Expressway Proposal for 250 multi family units on 5 lots totalling approximately 12.6 acres. Presentation by Brian McNabb to the Planning Commission and City Council, advising that the project is being "fast tracked" due to the applicable low interest loan program, through the Department of Housing and Urban Development, requiring submission by April 1, 1991. 3-26-91 Minutes Page 2 The applicant, SJV Development, was represented by China Tang who presented an overview of the entire project, along with the process required to obtain the loan interest loan. Both the Planning Commissioners and City Council requested additional information from Mr. Tang as relates to type of construction, including exterior materials. Mr. McNabb explained the moratorium placed on multi- family units approximately two years ago and that when the moratorium was removed, the R-3 ordinance was re- written to attempt to keep the density lower of 14-1/2 units per acre if no amenities of any sort were provided. Previously the R-2 zone allowed apartments at a rate of 14-1/2 units per acre and an R-3 zone allowed 25 units per acre, meeting minimum square footage of the apartments, provide parking, meet the setbacks and that was all. The new R-3 regulations said that the maximum density is 14-1/2 units per acre, meeting same criteria as before. Starting from that base density, you are allowed additions or deletions to that number depending on a number of factors. A reduction would be made if your streets were not wide enough (below a certain standard). An addition to density would be allowed if the developer provided playground equipment, etc. for the children. On this particular proposal the density is above the base of 14-1/2 units (approximately 19) per acre as the developer is proviaing a playground, additional open space, etc. Security also allows for increased density. City Council discussed the project as it relates to the newer ordinance and how the project addresses the requirements and that this project should be considered on the merits of the project alone and not on speculation of tenants. Motion by Commissioner Rutledge to approve 50 units. Motion died for lack of a second. 2 3-26-91 Minutes Page 3 Motion by Commissioner Taylor to continue Public Hearing to May 15, 1991. Seconded by Commissioner Hixson. Motion carried: 3-2 (Rutledge, Iacono) 11. CONSENT CALENDAR - City Council A. Conditional Use Permit 3-91 Applicant: SJV Development, Inc, Location: ITEM DID NOT COME BEFORE COUNCIL (NOT APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION) 111. CITY DEPARTMENTS A. Update on Cottonwood Partners request for appeal of sprinkler system. Appeal granted with additional information being received by Fire Department. IV. CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION Brian McNabb brought up the possibility of amendments to the fencing ordinance as brought up by developers since the adoption of the fence ordinance. Additionally, Staff has been questioned about the parking requirements for new developments. To address these and other concerns, a committee called Partners in Progress has been developed to provide for a public/private forum between developers and the City. The School District and the Chamber of Commerce are also involved. This Committee has also brought up sprinklers and fees and will attempt to do problem solving on a variety of areas. 3-26-91 Minutes Page 4 CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION (Cont'd) Councilman Ford stated it was imperative that Staff get together our zoning ordinances, new ordinances (fencing, parking), etc. and especially the General Plan, how has the General Plan been changed since it was adopted about six years ago, to give everyone a basis for beginning talks between the Commission and Council. Commissioner Iacono stated that her understanding was that the conceptual/specific plans were also to be incorporated in the General Plan. Mr. McNabb advised that there were actually four (4) planning areas that the City was trying to proactively plan in different degrees; Northwest Area, Southwest Area (south of Cottonwood), Northeast Area (easterly of San Jacinto, north of the current City limits) and Annexation #66. These areas are being included in the General Plan. Councilwoman Leahy inquired if actual property owners within the various areas were included in the committees formed for each specific plan. Mr. McNabb stated that yes all property owners have been contacted. Mr. McNabb advised the Commissioners and Council that Staff has contracted with Jerry Davenport, a retired planner in the area, to draft a development guide for the City of San Jacinto. Mayor Boykin stated that Council and Commission can set the policy, but that Staff must actually do the job according to the guidelines set. If Staff is not carrying out the job by the guidelines set by ordinance then Staff needs to be straightened out. The Mayor stated he does not want to get in the way of Staff's work. Councilman Hafliger stated that his position is that Council needs direction and input so that policy can be set'by the Council. 4 3-26-91 Minutes Page 5 V ADJOURNMENT - PLANNING COMMISSION Motion by Commissioner Iacono to adjourn to the meeting of April 10, 1991, at 7:30 p.m. Seconded by Commissioner Rutledge. Motion carried: 5-0. Time: 10:00 p.m. VI. EXECUTIVE SESSION Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to go into Executive Session for discussion of Potential Litigation and Real Property Transactions. Seconded by: Councilman Ford. Motion carried: 4-0 Time: 10:03 p.m. LET THE RECORD SHOW THAT NO ACTION WAS TAKEN AS A RESULT OF THIS EXECUTIVE SESSION. Motion by Councilman Ford to return to regular session. Seconded by: Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 4-0. Time: 11:14 p.m. V. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Councilman Ford to adjourn to April 2, 1991 at 7:30 p.m. at the Community Center. Seconded by: Councilwoman Leahy. Motion carried: 4-0. Time: 11:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Nancy Randolph Deputy City Clerk 5 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager rEOM: Nancy Randolph, Deputy City Clerk DATE: March 29, 1991 SUBJECT: "Inland Empire" Postmark t"•*, E77%., '7'• AA v.„0. Attached to this memorandum is a proposed Resolution in support of an "Inland Empire" postmark for mail processed at the San Bernardino General Mail Facility. The City of Hemet adopted a similar ordinance at their last meeting and we have been requested to adopt the proposed ordinance and forward to the Economic Development Partnership, Inc. in Riverside. They have a representative going to Washington, D.C. later this Spring who will hand carry resolutions from, hopefully, all of the cities in the two -county area. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. 1947 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING AN "INLAND EMPIRE" POSTMARK FOR MAIL PROCESSED AT THE SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL MAIL FACILITY WHEREAS, the State of California has identified the INLAND EMPIRE as one of the regions of the "California's"; and WHEREAS, the INLAND EMPIRE is defined as the Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino, the eastern portion of Los Angeles County, and the 47 incorporated cities therein; and WHEREAS, the INLAND EMPIRE is one of the fastest growing areas of the country; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the residents of the INLAND EMPIRE to strengthen the sense of region and community; and WHEREAS, there would be substantial benefit to the businesses and residents in the INLAND EMPIRE to enhance its national and international name recognition; and WHEREAS, the City fo San Jacinto values its identity as a business and residential location in the INLAND EMPIRE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of San Jacinto supports an "INLAND EMPIRE" postmark on all mail processed at the San Bernardino General Mail Facility; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of San Jacinto supports analysis of the service area of the San Bernardino General Mail Facility such that all INLAND EMPIRE mail would be processed at that location. ATTEST: MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 1991 Francis R. Boykin, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM; ancy Randolph, Deputy City Clerk James A. Cox City Attorney MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: March 28, 1991 SUBJ: Agricultural Preserve Diminishment 1-89 On November 16, 1989 the City Council tentatively approved Agricultural Preseve Diminishment 1-89 subject to the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval. However, a notification by resolution is required by the Government Code to be recorded with the County Records Office. Therefore Staff recommends Resolution 1949 be adopted. Sincerely, ri 94 Brian ',1'rNabb Director of Community Development. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Recording request by: City Clerk When recorded, return,to: City Clerk City of San Jacinto P.O. Box 4BB San Jacinto, CA 92383 RESOLUTION NO. 1949 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING TENTATIVE APPROVAL OF CANCELLATION OF AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE CONTRACT WHEREAS, the owner of the 124 acres of land located on the generally on either side of the Ramona Expressway, approximately 200 feet east of Sanderson Avenue, established an Agricultural Preserve by contract on January 1, 1972, pursuant to the Williamson Act, and identified as Agricultural Preserve No. 3; and WHEREAS, the Williamson Act provides for property owners to file a notice of nonrenewal of the agricultural preserve contract if they wish it to extinguish overtime, and the owners of said property filed for nonrenewal of their agricultural preserve contract in July 1987, which would by operation of law free the property on January 1, 1990, from any obligations under the 1972 contract; and WHEREAS, the property owners have filed a petition requesting cancellation of Agricultural Preserve Contract No. 3; and WHEREAS, a properly noticed public hearing was held on November 21, 1989, to review the petitioner's request and to receive any comments in favor of or in opposition to the cancellation of Agricultural Preserve No. 3; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, as follows: 1. This Council, based on evidence received at the public hearing, hereby makes the following findings in support of the cancellation of Agricultural Preserve No. 3: (a) Cancellation of Agricultural Preserve No. 3 as to the portion of the preserve lying generally on either side of the Ramona Expressway, approximately 200 feet east of Sanderson Avenue described and si.own in Exhibit 1 is in the public interest. (b) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 51282, this Council finds that other public concerns substantially outweigh the objectives of the Williamson Act in that this Council, on June 24, 1986, approved the General Plan for the City of San Jacinto wherein it states "Transition of agricultural to more urbanized uses is expected and consistent with city objectives for the future". The General Plan by implication declares that the continuance of agriculture in San Jacinto was very limited in the future. In connection therewith we found that the viability of agricultural land use in the City was declining due to continuing increases in operating costs, declining crop production, increased water costs, reduced market prices and the like, and that this decline has brought about the abandonment of agricultural uses in the City with accompanying increases in labor and costs necessary to control the encroachment of weeds and rodents from abandoned agricultural and vacant land, trespassing, drainage control problems, and -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 distasteful appearance. Developments since 1987 have made these conclusions even more applicable today. California Government Code Section 15900 states that it is a continuing policy of the State of California as well as a responsibility of the state to foster and promote growth and employment, productivity, income and purchasing power. This Council finds that this policy statement can and should be implemented in the City by the urbanization of the subject land. The Williamson Act provides in California Government Code Section 51220 that premature and unnecessary conversion of agricultural land to urban uses should be discouraged. Therefore, if conversion to commercial or residential uses is neither premature or unnecessary, then the objectives of the Williamson Act are not being served by holding such land in agriculture; to prevent such conversion in such circumstances would be contrary to those objectives. California Government Code Section 51280 specifically declares that relief from Williamson Act contractual restrictions is permitted. This Council wishes to grant such relief under the proper circumstances and in accord with the objectives of the Williamson Act. (c) Development of the land shown in Exhibit 2 would provide more contiguous patterns of urban development than development of proximate, noncontracted land in that the subject property is, due to its proximity to commercial areas at the intersection of Sanderson Avenue and the Ramona Expressway, and at Potter Road and the Ramona Expressway and due to its participation in a community facilities district, likely to be among the first group of parcels to be developed in the northwest portion of San Jacinto. 2. This Council hereby grants tentative approval of the request for cancellation of Agricultural Preserve No. 3 based on the findings contained herein, the documentation provided by the applicant, and all testimony entered into the public record. 3. This Council has received certification of cancellation valuation based on current market value from Steve Daniel of the Riverside County Assessor's office which indicates that the cancellation fee on this property would amount to such $146,275.00 based on current market values. This certification is set forth as Exhibit 3 to this resolution ATTEST: ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 1991. Mayor of the City of San Jacinto, CA Deputy City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, CA -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 CERTIFICATION I, Nancy Randolph, Deputy City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1949 was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, at an adjourned regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of April, 1991, by the following vote of the Council: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Jacinto, California, this 2nd day of April, 1991. Deputy City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, CA -3- W 41 I ik Duck Pond' Jthtt San Jacinto Diminishment of Agricultural Preserve San Jacinto #3 USGS QUADS Lakeview & San Jacinto SJV DEVELOPMENT 31325 SAGE RD. HEMET C.h.. EXHIBIT el ME VTR OF SAN ,Thl4fl,, COUNTY. CALFORMA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 24694 • Cit1A.11 1 JV 11-411.1.41.41 114,410N TA r4•44 I rlAl SAP/ 131•T47 WA11•44 MAW'. PRIPARIR ARV.CWM !Pm Am. cro 91. 111.1 Jig' 1/101054 1441 141,111140,11 ASSESSORS PARCEL NO 215101.40 I AMP use vreP AVA.A. •••• 4•444.44.411,41,11, 411111 11.111, IVY 141114111,,4,4aao a anroz vetR444.. OEREPAI MAN CRSKSNATION do t 01.14•4 APA44.1.14A freKES 111411141 4111 41411 114 )1,11 ""'"" 7;74''4= OnIt •414,414 /41. rolemnro ER,Am r4.4.4.r 14114/ 3 nit• 441 4410,1, „/ „ 4,4 AgrgAo,_,ygltVP4n,v101.4a1tr/ M14,O1 013•11F1 PAH .1441•010.141 ets4jek• PIA, ' • • - , • -:•-• • - — TYPICAL SECTION nA4•AvAl 4.44 1.1 Z. 4.1!111111.. AREAS ITN AORAIM 1.1 P0144 „ 4„,„, „ „,„ volt! • d , I n " MI CR t rt '""""P"'"' 1451(•• ,4(4,. 5154.4 M1 ,c, -M1,n. 2„ y - a se ^ e • - • • ^ t.:4.);t11(.11s, 11(ti eserve Diminishment 1-89 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR TO: Ross Nammar, City Manager City of San Jacinto, California FROM: FRANK C. SEELEY, ASSESSOR Agricu'` Exhibi` : County Administrative Center 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, California 92502 (714) 787-6331 rat Preserve Diminishment 1-89 SUBJECT: CERTIFICATION OF CANCELLATION VALUATION OF LAND AND ADDITIONAL DEFERRED TAXES FOR A PORTION OF SAN JACINTO NO.3, MAP NO.207 ***************************************************************************** CERTIFICATE OF CANCELLATION VALUATION BASED ON CURRENT MARKET VALUE I, the undersigned, hereby certify, pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 51283(a) and Title 18, California Administrative Code, Section 470, that the cancellation valuation for the below described property is as follows: ASSESSOR'S CANCELLATION CANCELLATION PARCEL NUMBER VALUATION FEE 430-130-029-2 $ 18,000.00 $ 2,250.00 430-130-030-2 115,000.00 14,375.00 430-130-031-3 17,000.00 2,125.00 430-130-038-0 250,200.00 31,275.00 430-190-021-0 175,600.00 21,950.00 430-190-022-1 594,400.00 74,300.00 Total $1,170,200.00 $146,275.00 FIRST YEAR CONTRACT ENTERED INTO = 1972 VIA INST.#26778 - 02/29/72 Date: OCTOBER 11, 1989 TOTAL CANCELLATION FEE $146,275.00 (per Section 51283a) TOTAL ADDITIONAL DEFERRED TAXES.. -0- (per Section 51283.1d) GRAND TOTAL DUE $146,275.00 FRANK C. SEELEY COUNTY ASSESSOR JAL by: Deputy County Assessbr STEVE T. DANIEL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. 1951 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO EXTENDING THE USE OF ANGLE PARKING ON PORTIONS OF MAIN STREET RECITALS WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Section 22503 permits local authorities to permit, by ordinance, angle parking on any roadway within its jurisdiction, and WHEREAS, Section 41, of Ordinance 358, enacted on April 15, 1960, establishes angle narking within the City at such places as the City may prescribe by ordinance or resolution, and WHEREAS, at this time, it is not feasible to establish parallel parking alone Main Street and that current studies are underway with respect to the realignment of State Highway 79 which may effect traffic within the downtown area. NOW, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, as follows: 1. The Council finds the foregoing to be true. 2. That the City Council establishes and extends the use of angle parking on Main Street between the intersections of San Jacinto Avenue and Jordan Street until April 1, 1993. Unless this resolution is otherwise revised or extended by subsequent resolution or ordinance, parallel parking shall thereafter be established in said area. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of April, 1991, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk Mayor CERTIFICATE The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of a Resolution adopted by the said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date therein set forth. Deputy City Clerk AG MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager FROM: Nancy Randolph, Deputy City Clerk DATE: March 29, 1991 SUBJECT: Award of Contract to Nadel Partnership Staff will be receiving the proposed cost to perform the services discussed in the attached memo on Monday, April 1. This infor- mation will be distributed as soon as received. MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DAIL: March 28, 1991 SUBJ: Award of Contract to the Nadel Partnership for Master Planning Services As you know, the City has been working on conceptual master planning of the Block bounded by Esplanade, Hewitt, Commonwealth, and San Jacinto as well as the commercial property east of Hewitt Street. This Block contains both the Hopkins Development parcel and the City's 7,5 acres. The architect for Hopkins, the Nadel Partnership Inc., has expressed a willingness to coordinate the Hopkins' plan with a master plan for the block which we asked them to give us a proposal on. In order to properly plan the block, Staff feels it is important to work with a single group to coordinate layout and development standards. The work program with Nadel will be multiple -phased. Initially involving the land and circulation planning and ending with design criteria to be followed. The cost of the master plan will be initially borne by the City. Staff will ultimately be bringing back a resolution calling for incremental reimbursement as development occurs. Staff recommends the Council award the master planning contract to the Nadel Partnership Inc. Respectfully, 97.1, BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM:Ir MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Pamel :f11.Z5fi, City Manager DATE: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and Council Members March 29, 1991 Economic Development -related Brochure With our information gathering nearly complete, Staff can now proceed with the development of economic development related material. We met with two Western Riverside County marketing/public relations firms last Thursday, who have experience in developing community and economic development -related programs. Among the various programs we discussed was the creation of an economic development -related brochure for use by the City at several economic development events in the next several months. Both firms will be submitting specific proposals on this proposed brochure, that unfortunately, will not be available by the April 2 Council Meeting. Since work needs to begin in the next week or so to meet some upcoming meeting deadlines, Staff would request that the Council delegate award authority to the Economic Development Council Subcommittee (members - Hafliger and Leahy). This is acceptable under our current Purchasing Ordinance. The amount most likely will not exceed $8000 and would be paid out of redevelopment funds. nr 1 AGE!DA MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager FROM: Henry Garcia, Asst. City Manager Anna Vega, Finance Director 0/7- SUBJECT: Workers Compensation Program DATE: April 2, 1991 In order to assist the City of San Jacinto in its endeavor to control or curtail costs, City staff has reviewed the costs incurred by our existing workerscompensation program. Our current program entails two aspects: (1) The costs of claims administration currently performed by Bierly and Associates and (2) The costs of excess workers' compensation coverage currently covered by Employers Reinsurance Corporation. Based upon the review of the following financial analysis, it is recommended that the Council authorize staff to enter into a new workers' compensation program created by Coachella Valley Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CVJPIA). The CVJPIA is utilizing the firm of Wear and Wood to handle all workers' compensation claim administration. The following is a comparison cost of existing services versus what they would be by joining CVJPIA: EXCESS WORKER COMPENSATION COVERAGE Limit of Liability Workers Comp Employer Self Insured Retention Rate Per $100 of Payroll Estimated Premium Employers CVJPIA Reinsurance Corp General Reinsurance $ 10,000,000 1,000,000 $ 10,000,000 1,000,000 225,000 250,000 .7_817 .2850 19,989 7,288 ESTIMATED COST SAVINGS TO CITY IS $12.701 for excess coverage. In order o ,. thieve this savings we must aI =c- contract with Wear &. Wood Associates for work,=rs' compensation administrative services. The cost comparison between Bierly & Associates and Wear & Wood are as follows: CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION COSTS BIERLY & ASSOCIATES: Payment are calculated accord to the lower of either losses payroll, Example: Total Losses for 1989-90 Total payroll Losses paid at 12% Payroll paid at. .50/100 98,071 2,557,163 11,769 12,785 Payment, made to Bierly & Assoc. for 1989-90 services $ 11,769 WEAR & WOOD, ASSOCIATES: Take over - 4 open cases @ $319/case CVJPIA"S Contract with Wear & Wood $303 per rase -average 25 cases 7,656 1,276 Annual cost. through CVJPIA $ 8,932 ONE TIME COST: C.V.J.P.I.A. Wear &. Wood computer set-up (Appx) TOTAL COST FIRST YEAR 1,000 50.0 4,500 $13,432 Due to start up cost with CVJPIA and Wear & Wood there are no cost savings the first year. Cost Savings will be approximately $4,433 each year thereafter for claim administration, Bierly & Associates administrative fees are calculated on total losses for the year or .50/100 of payroll whichever is less. Wear and Wood's administrative fees are based on a per case basis, At time their fee is $303 per case, Total savings for excess insurance and claim administration for the City is estimated $ 17,134 per year. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council authorize staff. to write a letter to C.V.J.P.I.A. and Wear &. Wood, Assoc. to provide services for Workers Compensation and administration. Staff also recommends the Council authorize staff to write a letter to Bierly and Associates. notifying them of our intent to cancel our existing contract, The existing contract require; a 90 day notice period prior to cancellation. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. 1952 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO (ANNEXATION NO. 63) WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission County adopted its Resolution No. 07-91 on the January, 1991, making determinations and approving annexation to the City of San Jacinto of territory Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by reference herein; and of Riverside 24th day of the proposed described in incorporated WHEREAS, the terms and conditions of annexation as approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission are set forth in Exhibit "B" hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the reasons for this proposed annexation are: 1. The proposal represents a logical and orderly extension of the boundaries of the City of San Jacinto. 2. The City of San Jacinto is capable of providing improved municipal services to the Territory. 3. The annexation is proposed in order to provide municipal services by the City of San Jacinto for the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, the regular county assessment roll is utilized by this City; and WHEREAS, the affected territory will not be taxed for existing general bonded indebtedness of this City; and WHEREAS, the City Council certifies that the Planning Commission of the City of San Jacinto has performed the required environmental review and has granted a Negative Declaration pursuant to City policy; and WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto was designated conducting authority and was authorized to proceed without notice, hearing, or election as set forth in Exhibit "B". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Jacinto hereby orders the territory described in Exhibit "A" annexed, and directs the City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto to transmit a certified copy of this resolution with applicable fees required by Section 54902.5 of the Government Code to the executive officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 1991 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Resolution NO. 1952 Page 2 ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk CERTIFICATION Mayor - City of San Jacinto The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. 1952 duly adopted by said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on tl:e date therein set forth. ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk 03/26/91 09:68 Revised: Revised: M69-023.001 February 1, 1990 February 20, 1991 March 11.1, 1991 Page 1 EXHIBIT L.A.F.C.O. NO. 90-75-3. ANNEXATION NO. 63 w0 THE CITY OF sAN JAcINTO. That portion of Blocks 116-1/2 end 117. of the lands of.the Hemet Land Company as shown by map -on file in Book 1 of Maps, Pages 14 and 15; Records of Riverside County, California, lying Within Section 6, Township 5 South, -Range 1 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, being more particularly described as folloW's; Beginning at the Center line intersection -of River Street and-Mountainvenueas said -intersection is shown on Record of Survey on file in Book 33 of Records of Survey, Pages 40 through 62, inclusive, said Riverside County Records, said intersection being also an angle point in the boundary line of Annexation No. 49 to the City of' San Jacinto; Thence North'44°47'59" Bast along said center line of River Street, being also. along Said:boundary line of Annexation No. 49, a titance of-1273.24 feet to 'the southwesterly lino. of Parce1-4020-12B as shown -on said Record.of Survey Thence South 44°26'17" East along said -southwesterly lino, and continuing South 44°26117. East along the southwesterly line of ParCels 4020-129 and 4020-130 of said Record of'Survey, 'a distance of 653.04 feet to -the beginning of a tangent curve concave northeasterly and having a radiUs of 3070.00 feet: Thence .southeasterly along said. curve and southwesterly line of Parcel 4020-130 through an angle of 13°53'51" a distance 1 Of 744.65 feet to an intersection with the Southeasterly line ot Parcel 1 of those certain parcels of land conveyed to. Acacia Financial Corporation by deed recorded' February 16, .1979 as' Instrument No. 33069, OfficialRecords of said Rivoido County; ThenceSouth 69°0259" West along said southeasterly lino :a distance of 353.14 feet to an intersection with the north line of washington Avenue; 66.00 feet wido; Thence South 0°22'39" West a distance of 33.00 foot to tho center line of said Washington Avenue; 91-34 0325. 91 09:09 Revised: Revised: H89-023.001 February 1, 1990 February 20, 1991 March 18, 1991 Page 3 Thence North 0 04'18" East along said original center line of Hemet Street, being also along said boundary line of Annex- ation No. 49, a distance of 218.82 feet to an intersection with the aforesaid center line of Mountain Avenue, said intersection being also an angle point in said boundary line of Annexation No. 49; Thence South 45°11'07" East along said center line of Mountain Avenue, being also along said boundary line of Annex- a'.:icn No. 4S, a distance of. 62.08 feet to the paint of begin- ning. Containing a computed area of 26.16 acres. ARED FOR AND s/LoWRY 545 W. FLORIDA AVE. HEMET CA 92343 /9/1/ BEHALF OF TNILEGAL DESCRIPTION BY RIYFASIDECO BY 91-39 03/2 /5 37 EXHIBIT "B" 1 2 7 4 5 G 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 rnvERBIOE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMi6®IONF i084 45MOH 9TRCC1 i CTH FLOOR VERriIOE. CALIFORNEA oxso1.sasl Locaj Agency Formation Commission County of Riverside RESOLUTION NO. 07-91 APPROVING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO LAFCO NO. 90-75-3 BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the Local Agency Formation Commission in regular session assembled on January 24, 1991, that the annexation of approximately 26 acres generally located north of Washington Avenue, southeast of River Street, west of Soboba Street in the San Jacinto area, as more particularly described in Exhibit IAA", attached hereto and made a part hereof, is approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND FOUND that: 1. Commission proceedings were commenced by petition of San Jacinto Properties. 2. The annexation is piaposed to provide more municipal services by the City of San Jacinto. 3. The distinctive short form designation of the proposed annexation is LAFCO No. 90-75-3, Annexation No. 63 to City of San Jacinto. 4. An environmental assessment was made on the proposal and a negative declaration filed thereon by the City of San Jacinto pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. The negative declaration has been reviewed and considered and is hereby adopted. 5. The boundaries of the territory as set forth in 03/26/91 Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, have been approved by the County Surveyor, contiguous to the City of San Jacinto, and are approved. 6. The territory to be annexed is uninhabited, there being fewer than 12 registered voters residing therein. 7. The City of San Jacinto is designated conducting authority. aro 8. The Executive Officer is directed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the above -designated conducting authority, to the chief petitioners, if different from the conducting authority, and to each affected agency. F. GILLAR BOYD, JR., chairman I certify the above resolution was passed and adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County on January 24, 1991. SPILIOTIS ue Officer EXIST. Y\ CITY LIMITS MS 139/11$-22 AS H 1 NGT014 i a COURSE DATA t SG9°02'59"VV 353.14` SO°2Z'39"W 33.004 3 S8° `3S'24"E [23.99' 4 NO`O4'I8"E 2115.02' POR BLOCK I!G:z i HEMET LAND CO MB I/ 14-15 t26.I ro ACRES II fi S `� !AVENUE I COM.1.40 WEALTH�O, AVE. 4 C1.1-Y L.' i.dS T5- WASH1NSTON 6S � A No rear vE_ • 'd• G3 LOCATION MAP NO SCALE 1*S MAP APPROVED Afar.' go 1441-/ EY IDEttW)flX St3WEY -SE`LY LINE INST. NO.330409 REC.2-140-19 (PAR. II. ANNEXATION NO. e: TO THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO EPAREA BY: NBS/LOWRY ENGINEERS a PLANNERS 1545 W. FLORIDA AVE. FI£LMET CA 9234 RIVERSIDE COUNTY L.A.FC. NO. DATE PREPARED FES_9l`99© REV. 2.-20-'°)�L CITY OF SAN JACINTO TREASURER'S OFFICE TIME DEPOSIT REGISTER Bank & Acct. No. Issued Maturity Rate Amt. Inv. Int. this Mo. State of California 9833794 02-20-85 Open 7.929 5,200,000. Red. 5133120 01-19-88 Open 7.929 1,600,000. Great Western 389-606357-9 01-07-91 04-08-91 7.300 700,000. 8,374.72 Far West Savings 013-10432-8 01-15-91 04-15-91 7.900 98,000. 666.67 Red. 013-14016-5 01-15-91 04-15-91 7.900 98,000. 666.67 013-16299-5 01-30-91 04-15-91 7.600 98,000. 641.35 Home Savings 107-022764-8 CLOSED TO LAIF 573.89 Total Invested $7,794,000. $ 10,923.30 March 1991 Register Federal I.D. No. 95-6000780 CITY OF SAN JACINTO TREASURER®S OFFICE TIME DEPOSIT REGISTER CIVIC CENTER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT BONDS Bank & Acct. No. Issued Maturity Rate Amt. Inv. Int. This Mo. Great Western Bank 389-603896-9 01-07-91 04-08-91 7.300 1,200,000. 14,356.66 389-603897-7 03-11-91 04-08-91 6.000 1,420,000. 4,295.50 389-607952-6 03-11-91 04-08-91 6.000 50,000. 151.25 Home Savings 107-022762-2 03-07-91 04-08-91 6.400 100,000. 559.44 107-022769-7 01-12-91 04-08-91 7.400 1,200,000. 7,646.67 Total Invested $3,970,000. $27,009.52 March 1991 Register Federal I.D. No. 95-6000780 (/P7L-Vii L»1UYL (it/Lei - L./ J •.--; / ,17 ? ',7/ (_. / '77(_, '1\ // .71 A /:(_"2,,t.,_ ic Nj Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District 901 West Esplanade Avenue P. O. Box 907 San Jacinto, California 92383 Telephone (714) 654-1505 March 8, 1991 George Lin Best Inn Buena Park Capri Hotel 7860 Beach Boulevard Buena Park, California 90620 Re: Approval to Use Property April 13, 1991 Dear Mr. Lin: Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District requests your approval to use your property located on Esplanade in San Jacinto for a staging area for our Valley -Wide Youth Baseball Parade. The Parade will highlight opening day activities for the Youth Baseball season. As I am sure you are awarc, Valley -Wide is a public agency providing park and recreation activities to the residents of the Valley. Your cooperation is truly appreciated. Please sign this letter and return in the stamped self- addressed envelope as we may present your approval to the San Jacinto City Council. Again, thank you for your community support. Sincerely, SWG/slp eneral Manager eation and Park District Approved By: George Lin March 2S, 1991 TO: FROM: SUBJECI: Sn into Fire Department MEMO AGENDA Pamela S. Easter, City Manager Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief Par edic Committee I am requesting a one (1) month extension on the selection of a paramedic committee. Thf-re an- several things going on at the County level that could drastically impact the City of San Jacinto's ability to initiate a paramedic program. One of the issues that is significant is a proposal that would make it mandatory for a jurisdiction or agency who provides advanced life support to have two fully equipped and staffed units on duty twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. This would be impossible for the City to maintain at this time. Another problem is the County EMS transportation plan which has been in the process for over a year. The hot topic on the transportation plan is the issue of exclusive" and "non --exclusive" operating zones. The Fire Chiefs Association has had constant problems with Countv Health EMS and will b eet;ngb the next two weeks with representatives of the County Health Department to resolve the many issues pending. It is my opinion that this County caters to the private ambulance providers. There is no use to form a citizen's committee until these issues are resolved. I will be at your convenience to discuss the paramedic program and EMS in general. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. 1948 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE DESIRE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE TO ACQUIRE AND EXERCISE JURISDICTION OF THE LAKE WHEREAS, at the present time Lake Elsinore is operated under the jurisdiction of the California State Parks and Recreation Department; and WHEREAS, Lake Elsinore is within the corporate boundaries and sphere of influence of the City of Lake Elsinore; and WHEREAS, Lake Elsinore is central to both the purpose and welfare of the community providing both significant recreation opportunities and economic support to the area through tourist related aspects; and WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore are the most appropriate Agencies for owning and operating Lake Elsinore as a consequence of the breadth of ooth civic and economic powers; and WHEREAS, it is clearly in the best interest of the community to have a local agency responsive to local citizenry responsible for operating the lake. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby support and encourage the City of Lake Elsinore to acquire and exercise jurisdiction of the Lake and do further encourage the State of California and its Agencies, State Parks and Recreation Depart- ment to enter into discussions with the City of Lake Elsinore concerning the potential acquisition of Lake Elsinore. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 1991. ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk Mayor