HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 3/5/1991AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
AND THE COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
625 South Pico, San Jacinto
DATE: March 5, 1991
TIME: 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Boykin, Ford, Hafliger, Leahy, Rose
MOMENT OF SILENCE FOR REFLECTION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
I.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine
and will be enacted by one motion by the City Council in the form
listed.
There will be no separate discussion on these
unless members of the City Council, staff
specified items to be removed and/or discussed.
Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar
upon invitation of the Mayor, state their name,
Calendar item number.
items prior to the motion
or the public requests
item should come forward,
address, and the Consent
A. Approval of Minutes of February 19, 1991.
B. Approval of Warrant Nos. 24495 through 24597,
as submitted by the Finance Director.
C. Time Deposit Register as submitted by the Treasurer for
the period ending February 28, 1991. (Receive and
file.)
D. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1938
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, identifying various policies and procedures
that enhance opportunities for a prudent and systematic
investment policy and to organize and formalize
investment -related activities.
(City Treasurer and Finance Director recommend adoption)
E. Ratification of amendment to Memorandum of Understanding
between the City of San Jacinto and the San Jacinto
Firefighters Association. (City Attorney recommends
approval.)
3-5-91 Agenda
Page 2
CONSENT CALENDAR cont'd
F. Reduction of Performance Bond
Applicant: Woodhaven Developers, Inc.
Location: Washington and Mountain Avenues
Authorization for the County of Riverside to reduce
the Performance Bond for Tract 16811 to $300,000.
(Staff recommends approval.)
G. Release of Monument Bond - Tract No. 25021
Applicant: GGP
Location: San Jacinto Garden Apartments, 700 Idyllwild
Release of Monument Bond in the amount of $500.00
(Staff recommends approval.)
H. Joint Powers Agreement for the Western Riverside Council
of Governments and authorization of memberships of new
cities of Calimesa and Murrieta to Council. (Staff
recommends adoption.)
I. Introduction of a new City Logo
(Staff recommends adoption.)
J. Proposed Classification/Compensation Study
(Staff recommends adoption.)
K. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1939
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California, approving the adoption of an
"Automatic Aid Agreement" between the City of San
Jacinto and the County of Riverside, which directly
involves the apparatus, equipment and personnel
resources of the City of San Jacinto Fire Department.
(Staff recommends adoption.)
L. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda pursuant to
City Attorney.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to approve
consent calendar items A through L, and adopt Resolution
Nos. 1938 and 1939 and waive the readings in full.
Vote:
11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Environmental Impact Assessment and
General Plan Amendment 1-91
Applicant: North Mountain Partners
Location: approximately 1,116 acres located in the San
Jacinto Mountains north of Soboba Road, occupying
Sections 13 and 14 and portions of Sections 16 and 23.
3-5-91 Agenda
Page 3
PUBLIC HEARINGS cont'd
Proposal to amend the Land Use Element of the General
Plan from Hillside to Specific Plan Area.
Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1942
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, approving amendment to the Land Use Element of
the San Jacinto General Plan for the First Cycle of
1991.
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to
adopt Resolution No. 1942 and waive the reading in full.
Vote:
B. Environmental Impact Assessment and Change of Zone 2-91
Applicant: North Mountain Partners
Location: approximately 1,116 acres located in the San
Jacinto Mountains north of Soboba Road, occupying
Sections 13 and 14 and portions of Sections 16 and 23.
Proposal for pre -annexation Zone Change to W-2,
Controlled Development on the subject property.
Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 930
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California approving Change of Zone 2-91
amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to
introduce Ordinance No. 930 to second reading, subject
to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative
Tloc,larafinn and wai\n3 fhe rPadin(f in frill,
Vote:
III. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
A. North Mountain
Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1941
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto
expressing interest in the Development of Soboba Summit on
North Mountain.
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to adopt
Resolution No. 1941 and waive the reading in full.
Vote:
3-5-91 Agenda
Page 4
IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
A. Ramona Days/Cinco de Mayo Fiesta - May 4 and 5, 1991
San Jacinto Business Association
(request for waiver of business license and fees.)
V. CITY DEPARTMENTS
A. Update on The Villas Water Issue - John Townsel
B. Followup from Retreat - 2010 Committee
C. Consideration of Paramedic Issue - Ross Chadwick
D. Truck Route Designations - Joe Kozma
Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 931
An Ordinance of the Council of the City of San Jacinto,
California, Designating Truck Routes Within the City.
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to
introduce Ordinance No. 931 to second reading and waive
the reading in full.
Vote:
VI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/COMMENTS
A. Appointment of vacant Planning Commission seat
Mayor Boykin
B. City of San Jacinto Mission Statement
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to
Vote:
3-5-91 Agenda
Page 5
VII.
EXECUTIVE SESSION - Personnel Matter & Real Property
Transaction
(Possible property transactions at southeast corner of San
Jacinto and Esplanade Avenues to negotiate with Hopkins
Development Co.)
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to go into
Executive Session for discussion of Personnel Matter and
Real Property Transactions.
Vote: Time:
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to return
to Regular Session.
Vote: Time:
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to adjourn
to March 8, 1991 at 2:30 p.m. at the Embers Restaurant
for a joint meeting with Hemet and EMWD on Valley water
issues.
Vote:
Meeting adjourned at p.m.
Next regular City Council meeting March 19, 1991.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
F1OM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Anna A. Vega, Finance Director
and Kenneth Leahy, Treasurer
March 1, 1991
Investment Policy of the City of San Jacinto
Attached for your consideration is Resolution No. 1938, identifying
various policies and procedures in establishing a prudent and
systematic investment policy and to organize and formalize
investment -related activities. Under Government Code Section 53646
(a) the Treasurer and Finance Director must annually provide the
Council with an investment policy.
The objective is to maintain a high level of investment of idle
city funds that is as near as 100% invested as possible.
Both your Finance Director and City Treasurer have reviewed the
nolir-xr and 1-ecomTmonr1
adoption.
attachment
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3
32
RESOLUTION NO. 1938
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
IDENTIFYING VARIOUS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES THAT ENHANCE
OPPORTUNITIES FOR A PRUDENT AND SYSTEMATIC INVESTMENT
POLICY AND TO ORGANIZE AND FORMALIZE INVESTMENT -RELATED
ACTIVITIES.
WHEREAS, it is the purpose of this Policy to identify
various policies and procedures that enhance opportunities
for a prudent and systematic investment policy and to
organize and formalize investment -related activities.
Related activities which compromise good cash management
include accurate cash projections, the expeditious
collection of revenue, the control of disbursements, cost-
effective banking relations, and a short-term borrowing
program which coordinates working capital requirements and
investment opportunity. In concert with these requirements
are the many facets of an appropriate and secure short-term
investment program.
WHEREAS, it is intended that this policy cover all
funds and investment activities under the direct authority
of the City of San Jacinto.
WHEREAS, the objectives of this policy are:
A. Safety: It is the primary duty and responsibility
of the Treasurer to protect, preserve and maintain cash and
investments placed in his/her trust on behalf of the
citizens of the community.
B. Liquidity: An adequate percentage of the
portfolio should be maintained in liquid short-term
securities which can be converted to cash if necessary to
meet disbursement requirements. Since all cash
requirements cannot be anticipated, investments in
securities with active secondary or resale markets is
highly recommended. Emphasis should be on marketable
securities with low sensitivity to market risk.
C. Yield: Yield should become a consideration only
after the basic requirements of safety and liquidity have
been met.
D. Market -Average Rate of Return: The investment
portfolio shall be designed to attain a market -average rate
of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking
into account the City's risk constraints, the cash flow
characteristics of the portfolio, and State and Local laws,
ordinances or resolutions that restrict investments.
E. Diversification: The investment portfolio will be
diversified to avoid incurring unreasonable and avoidable
risks regarding specific security types or individual
financial institutions.
F. Prudence: The City adheres to the guidance
provided by the "prudent man rule", which obligates a
fiduciary to insure that:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Resolution No. 1938
Page 2
1
2
"...investment shall be made with the exercise of
3 that degree of judgment and care, under circumstances then
prevailing, which persons of produce, discretion and
4 intelligence exercise in the management of their own
affairs, not for speculation but for investment considering
5 the probable safety of their capital as well as the
probable income to be derived."
6
G. Public Trust: A11 participants in the investment
7 process shall act as custodians of the public trust.
Investment officials shall recognize that the investment
8 portfolio is subject to public review and evaluation. The
overall program shall be designed and managed with a degree
9 of professionalism that is worthy of the public trust. In
a diversified portfolio it must be recognized that
occasional measured losses are inevitable, and must be
considered within the context of the overall portfolio's
investment return, provided that adequate diversification
has been implemented.
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 53607 permits the
"Legislative Body" to delegate the authority to invest or
reinvest the City funds or to sell or exchange securities
so purchased, to the "Treasurer" of San Jacinto, who shall
hereafter assume full responsibility for such transactions
until such time as the delegation of authority is revoked
by the legislative body.
WHEREAS, the Treasurer or Finance Director shall
submit a monthly investment report to the city Council.
This report will include all required elements of the
monthly report as prescribed by Government Code Section
53646.
Minimum required elements of the monthly report:
a. Type of investment.
b. Institution.
c. Date of maturity.
d. Amount of deposit or cost of the security.
e. Current market value of securities with maturity
in excess of 12 months.
f. Rate of interest.
g. Statement relating the report to the Statement of
Investment Policy.
h. Statement that there are sufficient funds to meet
the next 30 days' obligations.
i. Effective January 1, 1991, Accrued Interest as
prescribed by the California Code Section 53646,
if required by the City Council.
Additional information may be included in the monthly
report, but it is not required by the Government Code.
Some items that might be included:
o Interest earned to date
o Average weighted yield
o Average days to maturity
o Actual transactions
o Percent distribution to each type investment
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Resolution No. 1938
Page 3
WHEREAS, it is the Treasurer's option to submit a
Quarterly or Annual report of a Statement of Investment
Policy to the City Council with a more detailed or
expansion report of investments.
WHEREAS, security purchases and holdings will be
maintained within statutory limits imposed by the
Government Code. Exhibit A shows the current Government
Code limitations and maturities.
WHEREAS, a System of internal control shall be
established. The controls shall be designed to prevent
losses of public funds arising from fraud, employee error,
misrepresentation of third parties, unanticipated changes
in financial markets, or imprudent actions by employees and
officers of the City of San Jacinto. Controls deemed most
important include: control of collusion, separation of
duties, separating transaction authority from accounting
and recordkeeping, custodial safekeeping, clear delegation
of authority, specific limitations regarding securities
losses and remedial action, written confirmation of
telephone transactions, minimizing the number of authorized
Investment Officials, documentation of transactions and
strategies, and code of ethics standards.
WHEREAS, the Treasurer shall consider the
creditworthiness of financial institutions in selecting for
the deposit of investment of City funds. The Treasurer or
Finance Director shall continue to monitor financial
institutions' credit characteristics and financial history
throughout the period in which City funds are deposited or
invested.
WHEREAS, the City recognizes that investment risks can
result from issuer defaults, market price changes or
various technical complications leading to temporary
illiquidity. Therefore, Portfolio diversification will be
employed as a way to control risk. The Treasurer or
Finance Director is expected to display prudence in the
selection of securities, as a way to minimize default risk.
No individual investment transaction shall be undertaken
which jeopardizes the total capital position of the overall
portfolio. The Treasurer shall periodically establish
guidelines and strategies to control risks of default,
market price changes and illiquidity.
WHEREAS, in addition to these general policy
considerations, the Treasurer and Finance Director
will strictly observe the following specific policies.
A. All transactions will be executed on a delivery
versus payment basis.
D. A competitive bid process, when practical, will be
used to place all investment purchases.
WHEREAS, all securities owned by the City should be
held by a third party except the collateral for time
deposits in banks and savings and loans. Collateral for
time deposits in banks and savings and loans will be held
by the Federal Home Loan Bank. The collateral for time
deposits in banks will be held in the name of the City of
San Jacinto in the bank's Trust Department or alternately,
in the Federal Reserve Bank.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
91
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Resolution No. 1938
Page 4
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council
of the City of San Jacinto adopts the Investment Policy.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED the 5th day of March, 1991
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
By
Deputy City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
Mayor
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of
Resolution No. 1938 duly adopted by the said City Council
of the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein.
Deputy City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
MAXIMUM
PERMITTED INVESTMENTS/ PERCENTAGES MAXIMUM
DEPOSITS MATURITY
Securities of the U.S. Government Unlimited 5 Years*
Certificates of Deposits Unlimited 5 Years*
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 30% 5 Years*
Bankers Acceptances 40% 270 days
Commercial Paper 30% 180 days
LAIF 10MM*** n/a
Passbook deposits - n/a
Repurchase agreement - 1 Year
Mutual Funds 15% n/a
Medium Term Notes 30% 5 Years*
County Pooled Funds Unlimited n/a
*Maximum term unless expressly authorized by Governing Body and within
the prescribed time frame for said approval,
***Limit set by L.A.I.F. Governing Board, not Government Code.
MINUTES
San Jacinto City Council
and the Council Sitting as
the Redevelopment Agency
and Industrial Development Authority
Regular Adjourned Meeting
19 February 1991
AGEND
The regular meeting of the San Jacinto City Council, the Council sitting
as the Redevelopment Agency and Industrial Development Authority was
called to order at 7:30 p.m by Mayor Boykin at the Community Center, 625
S. Pico Avenue
Roll Call - Present: Councilmen Boykin, Ford, Hafliger, Leahy and
Rose.
Staff Members - City Manager Easter, Community Development
Director McNabb, Finance Director Vega, Police Chief Kozma,
Fire Chief Chadwick, Asst. City Manager Garcia, Water
Superintendent Townsel and City Attorney Cox.
Moment of Silence for Reflection.
Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Boykin.
Mayor Boykin requested consideration of the Executive Session being
moved before the Consent Calendar.
Motion by Councilman Rose to go into Executive Session for potential
litigation at 7:35 p.m.
Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy.
Motion carried: 5-0.
Motion by Councilman Ford to return to Regular Session at 7:45
Seconded by Councilman Rose.
Motion carried: 5-0.
1. CONSENT CALENDAR
p.m.
A. Approval of Minutes of February 5, 1991.
B. Approval of Warrant Nos. 24358 through 24494, in the
amount of $585,895.48 as submitted by the Finance
Director.
C. Financial Report of Activity for period ending January
31, 1990. (Receive and file.)
D. Ordinance for Adoption - Ordinance No. 928
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California approving Change of Zone 25-90
amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto.
E. Ordinance for Adoption - Ordinance No. 929
An Ordinance o t e City Council of the of San
Jacinto, California, approving Change of Zone 1-91
amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto.
2-19-91 Minutes
Page 2
F. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1931
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto placing the funds held under its deferred
compensation plan be administered by the ICMA Retirement
Corporation.
G. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1932
Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, joining with County government schools, other
cities and special districts in Riverside County to
express concern about Senate Bill 2557 and its divisive
effect on local governments' ability to work
cooperatively to meet the collective needs of all County
residents and urge repeal of Senate Bill 2557 with the
enactment of an acceptable, adequate and dependable
replacement revenue source.
H. Award of Bid - Villas Water Connection
(Staff recommends project be completed by in-house City
Staff and reject all bids)
I. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1933
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, approving the adoption of Annex "B" -- Fire and
Rescue Operations/Fire Mutual Aid Plan of the County of
Riverside Emergency Operations Plan, which directly
involves the apparatus, equipment qand personnel
resources of the City of San Jacinto Fire Department.
J. Approval of Change Order #1 - NBS/Lowry
Design of the east side of the intersection of Esplanade
in an amount not to exceed $8500.00. (Staff recommends
approval.)
K. Road Maintenance Agreement - McNabb
Agreement with County of Riverside for road maintenance
on Cottonwood Avenue and Lyon Avenue per LAFCO's
approval of Annexation No. 65. (Staff recommends
approval.)
L. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1929
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, declaring its intention to initiate on its own
motion proceedings to annex certain uninhabited
territory known as Annexation No. 69. (Staff recommends
approval.)
M. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1935
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto confirming Resolution 1727A and commencing
proceedings for amending the Sphere of Influence of the
City of San Jacinto. (Staff recommends approval.)
N. Final Tract Map 24140
Applicant: Sirco Development, Inc.
Location: northwest corner of Chase Street and the
Ramona Expressway. (Staff recommends approval of Final
Map 24140 and authorizing Mayor to execute the
Subdivision Agreement.)
0. Acceptance of Road Deed for corner cutoff right of way
and waterline easement along the north side of Ramona
Blvd. at Tiger Lane. (Staff recommends approval.)
2-19-91 Minutes
Page 3
P. Release of Monument Bond for Tract 12152-1
Applicant: Forecast Corporation
Location: north side of Idyllwild Drive, approximately
700 feet east of State Street. (Staff recommends
approval.)
Q. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda pursuant to
City Attorney.
Motion by Councilman Ford to remove Item I-H for separate consideration.
Seconded by Councilman Rose.
Motion carried: 5-0.
Motion by Councilman Rose to approve consent calendar items A through Q
(minus H pulled for separate consideration), adopt Ordinance Nos. 928
and 939 and Resolution Nos. 1929, 1931, 1932, 1933, and 1935 and waive
the readings in full.
Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy.
Motion carried: 5-0.
1. H. Villas Water Connection
Water Superintendent Townsel gave Council and audience
an update on the above referenced project, advising
that bids had been received on February 13, 1991. The
only bid received was from Genesis Construction in the
amount of $11,416.00. Mr. Townsel advised Council
that his estimate of using day labor (city employees)
would come to a total cost of $4,781.00. City Attorney
Cox advised that this action was legal, but it was
necessary for staff to add Resolution No. 1936, by
Council motion, to the Agenda, pursuant to Govt. Code
54954.2(2)(b).
Motion by Councilman Ford to add Resolution No. 1936, approving the
construction of a waterline (Sombra Way and Camino Grande) by day labor
pursuant to Public Contract Code 20167.
Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy.
Motion carried: 5-0.
Councilman Hafliger cautioned on calling for bids and
then rejecting them for completion by City employees.
Motion by Councilman Ford to reject all bids and adopt Resolution No.
1936, and waive the reading in full.
Seconded by Councilman Rose.
Motion carried: 5-0.
2-19-91 Minutes
Page 4
II.
17TH YEAR CDBG FUNDS
(Mayor Boykin and Councilwoman Leahy left the room during
the discussion on public service groups, requesting funds
and possible recommendation of disbursement of funds to
these groups, due to possible conflict of interest.)
Presentation by Assistant City Manager Garcia recapping the
public service groups that had requested funds from the
CDBG available funds:
Senior Day Care Center $5,000
Valley Restart Shelter 5,000
San Jacinto High School
Student Body 2,500
San Jacinto Valley School
of the Arts 5,000
Phoenix House 4,000
San Jacinto Valley Museum unknown
Valley Teen Project 5,000
Mr. Garcia stated that the San Jacinto High School Student
Body and San Jacinto Valley Museum were not eligible for
funds in that they did not meet the County's criteria for
public service group(s).
Mr. Garcia advised Council that another request came in
after the public meeting and public hearing from the
Alternatives to Domestic Violence coalition, but it cannot
be considered at this time due to the fact that it was
submitted after the public hearing had been held.
Mayor Pro Tem Ford, conducting the meeting in Mayor
Boykin's absence from the room, advised Council that 15% of
the funds to be alloted for "public service" projects was
$14,749, leaving $83,579 remaining (or 85%) for other
projects. Mayor Pro Tem Ford asked City Attorney
Cox if funds could be allocated by %. City Attorney Cox
advised that they could.
Motion by Councilman Hafliger to distribute 15% for public service as
follows: Senior Day Care Center - $4,000, Valley Restart Shelter -
$3,000, San Jacinto Valley School of the Arts - $3,000, Phoenix House
$3,000 and Valley Teen Project - $1,749, if groups could meet the
requirements of public service designation established by the Federal
Government and administered by the County.
Seconded by Councilman Rose.
Motion -carried: 3-0.
Mayor Boykin and Councilwoman Leahy returned to the
meeting.
Mr. McNabb, Community Development Director, provided
Council and audience with a breakdown of the capital
projects that Staff recommended being considered for CDBG
funding:
2-19-91 Minutes
Page 5
Replacement of water mains $187,500
Supplement 7th Street sewer/
water project 15,000
Additional room to Community
Center 7,500
Installation of sewer mains 92,625
Mr. McNabb stated that the Staff recommended the following
priorities:
7th Street Sewer & Water Project - $ 15,000
Engineering fees for RFP preparation
for replacing water mains at four
locations: Vernon (between Main St.
7th St.), Andrews Ave. (between 5th/
7th), Soboba Ave. (between 5th/7th),
and 5th St. (between Vernon and
Soboba Ave.) 15,000
5th St. and possibly Soboba water 43,579
main replacement (funds allowing)
Community Center addition 10,000*
*after additional discussion it was determined that
the requested $7,500 was too low and should be in-
creased to $10,000.
Motion by Councilman Ford to designate the following projects for
receipt of the remaining 85% CDBG funds for the l7th Year: 7th Street
Sewer & Water Project - $15,000, Engineering fees for RFP preparation
for replacing water mains at 4 streets (Vernon, Andrews, Soboba and 5th
St.) - $15,000, 5th St. and possibly Soboba water main replacement (if
funds available) - $43,579, and Community Center addition - $10,000.
Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy.
Motion carried: 5-0.
III PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Annexation No. 65
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development, advised
that LAFCO at their December 6, 1990, public hearing it was
recommended that the City execute a Maintenance
Agreement with the County for maintenance on Cottonwood.
Mayor Boykin opened the Public Hearing. The Deputy City
Clerk stated that affidavit of publication was on file and
that no verbal or written comments had been received.
As no one wished to speak, the Mayor closed the Public
Hearing.
Motion by Councilman Rose to adopt Resolution No. 1934 and waive the
reading in full.
Seconded by Councilman Ford.
Mction carried: 5-0.
2-19-91 Minutes
Page 6
B. Conditional Use Permit 8-82 - Heritage Ranch RV Park
Presentation by Community Development Director Brian McNabb
advising that Heritage Ranch is not an "RV" Park as defined
by State Law in that spaces are rented. Under the Health &
Safety Code, Heritage Ranch would be defined as a
"Subdivision". Cities (municipalities) control land uses
of a subdivision versus an RV Park. The request before the
City Council tonight was variance 6-90 (amendment to
Conditional Use Permit 8-82). The Planning Commission
recommends ratification of the approval of Variance subject
to Staff report and findings of fact. The majority of the
Heritage Ranch owners are requesting the amendment to allow
a second recreational vehicle on the lot. Mr. McNabb
advised that Staff does not feel that a second vehicle on
each lot will take away from the quality of the
subdivision, but does crowd the lot. In November the City
Council requesting a further Public Hearing be held to
further consider the matter.
Mayor Boykin opened the Public Hearing and advised that a
petition had been received by all Council members in
support of the variance. The City Clerk stated that an
affidavit of publication was on file and that no other
written or verbal comments had been received. Mayor Boykin
requested that those in favor of the variance speak first,
limiting their comments to areas not brought up by other
speakers, followed by those opposed to the variance, with
the same guidelines to be followed.
Ms Isabelle Harrison, President of Association, Lot 59,
Heritage Ranch, stated that the petition given to the
Council contained 247 signatures out of a possible 384 lot
owners. Since the time of the petition being signed there
had been an additional seven (7) people in support of the
amendment.
Mr. Leland Mikkelsen, Lot 208, Heritage Ranch, (Past
President of Assoc.), handed out a description of an R.V.
to each of the Council. This description was given to show
a difference between the R.V. and the park model, "a mini
mobile home". Mr. Mikkelsen further offered that the
Heritage Ranch CC&R's address unsightly vehicles, etc.
Mr. Bob Smith, Lot 173A, Heritage Ranch, (4-year resident)
stated that he moved to Heritage Ranch because it was a
well -managed community for two reasons; convenient and
security.
Mr. Jerry Carnahan, Lot 147A, Heritage Ranch, (4-year
resident) called for a show of hands in favor of
enforcement by Heritage Ranch Board rather than the City.
(A majority of the attendees raised their hands.)
Mr. Gordy Tully, Heritage Ranch, in opposition to the
variance, deferred to Mr. Wallace Hill.
2-19-91 Minutes
Page 7
Mr. Wallace Hill, Lot #60, Heritage Ranch, Chairman of the
Concerned Citizens Committee, spoke in opposition to the
variance. Mr. Hill stated that this amendment would
disrupt the quality of life and impact on the neighbors that
have increased number of vehicles obstructing their view.
Mr. Hill passed out photos to each of the Council, urging
non -ratification of amendment. Mr. Hill additionally had
letters supporting his opposition to the variance from
various other RV parks in the County.
Virginia Wickes, Lot 12A, Heritage Ranch, stated that she
had witnessed an emergency vehicle enter the park and that
there was not a problem with access to the home with an RV
also on the lot.
Councilman Hafliger questioned if the City was within the
legal limits of the law in adopting the Planning
Commission's amendments of conditions of approval for CUP 8-
82.
Motion by Councilman Ford to ratify the Planning Commission's approval
for Variance 6-90 to Conditional Use Permit 8-82.
Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy.
Motion carried: 5-0.
Mayor Boykin called for a five-minute recess at 9:10 p.m.
Council reconvened at 9:15 p.m.
IV. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
A. Ray Johnson, 1069 Sombra Way, expressed his hope that
the water lines will be connected in the near future.
V. CITY DEPARTMENTS
A. Update on The Villas Water Issue - John Townsel
Presentation by John Townsel, Water Superintendent,
advising the tie-in between Sombra and Encanto will be
in progress beginning tomorrow morning, with the
ordering of parts. Installation will begin and targeted
for completion by March 14 or before.
Mayor Boykin inquired if there was anyway to expedite
the receiving of non -stock parts. Superintendent
Townsel advised that work could begin with the parts in
stock and those being ordered would be here by the time
needed. Mayor Boykin further inquired if there was any
possibility on getting unstocked parts from other water
departments to expedite the installation. Mr. Townsel
stated there was and that he would attempt a request to
borrow from other water departments.
2-19-91 Minutes
Page 8
B. Annexation #66 - Jim Cox and Brian McNabb
(Councilman Hafliger excused himself from meeting to
avoid a possible conflict of interest).
Mr. McNabb gave a presentation on the annexation for
consideration, consisting of 6000 acres and 65 property
owners with the City of San Jacinto serving as the lead
agency. Four contracts have been executed for
consulting work; NBS/Lowry for project coordination and
application preparation for $86,800., Turrini & Brink
for general plan and zoning plan for $40,200., Ultra
Systems for environmental impact report for $142,790.,
and Christensen & Wallace for fiscal impact study for
$8,500.
City Attorney Cox explained the basis for the
requested draft Resolution, authorizing deferred payment
of fees related to request for Annexation No. 66. The
originally estimated fee of $40/acre did not take into
consideration the filing fees for general plan and
sphere of influence amendments, along with no financial
participation from some landowners, bringing the revised
fee to $70/acre. It is recommended (1) that the
information be discussed further and a per acre charge
be established and (2) a Public Hearing be set for all
property owners.
Councilman Ford inquired if all fees will be paid at
another time? Mr. McNabb advised that, with adoption of
the Resolution, the City would be deferring unpaid
charges to the annexation. Councilman Ford inquired if
the fees would be paid up front and if there were funds
available. Mr. McNabb advised that the City would be
providing approximately $86,800., including application
fees to LAFCO for annexation and sphere of influence
amendments. Finance Director Vega further informed
Council that Staff was looking into this request by the
proposed annexation owners a part of the mid -year review
of the budget.
Mr. McNabb introduced Annexation #66 Steering Committee
Chairman John Schouten and Vice Chairman Garrett
DeVries, along with Clayton Record from NBS/Lowry, the
project coordinator, representing the property owners'
Advisory Committee. Mr. Record stated that this
annexation was very important in itself, due to an
unprecedented cooperative effort and a doubling of the
size to the City of San Jacinto. Mr. Record further
advised that all infrastructure for the area would be
provided as part of the planning of this annexation,
including an alignment of Highway 79, a major corridor
of importance. The infrastructure identification will
also identify drainage and sewer problems within the
area, along with preserving natural habitats
2-19-91 Minutes
Page 9
(establishment of a museum within the area for
discovered items), identification of physical
constraints (providing a cost advantage of doing a large
area at one time), and early identification of school
sites.
John Schouten, Chairman of the Annexation Steering
Committee, also on the San Jacinto School District Board
advised that the project has been presented to the
School District, advising that the project is a 20-year
project. Mr. Schouten stated that growth will happen
and we need to allow it to happen here.
Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to adopt Staff's recommendations and bring
back the draft Resolution and set a Public Hearing.
Seconded by Councilman Rose.
Motion carried: 4-0 (Hafliger not in room)
Mayor Boykin stated that this was a large endeavor and
mind -boggling, but very exciting to begin a 20-year
project.
C. HIP's Request for Redevelopment Funds-Vosburg Hotel
Presentation by Brian McNabb, Director of Community
Development, stating that the Housing for Independent
People group is requesting $600,000 of redevelopment
funds to rehabilitate the Vosburg Hotel. As of July 1,
1990, the Redevelopment Agency's balance was $321,318,
as determined by the independent audit. Added to this
would be the 1st increment of property taxes received by
the Redevelopment Agency.
Neil Stone, representing HIP (Housing for Independent
People), 25 E. Hedding St., San Jose, allowed that his
agency was a non-profit, maintenance and rehabilitation
of low-cost housing projects over 50 units. Mr. Stone
further advised that his group will seek National
Historic recognition for the Vosburg Hotel, and maintain
same motiff with additions being considered. Mr. Stone
stated that his group works with Social Services to
respond to ambulatory patient needs. He also stated
that without Council approval of funds from the City's
Redevelopment Agency, it was unlikely HIP would proceed
with the Vosburg project.
Councilman Ford inquired if there would be a need to
abandon 3rd Street? Mr. McNabb stated that the
applicant was requesting the abandonment and that a
Public Hearing would be required. Councilman Ford
inquired if there was any possibility of funds being
used from another source of funds? Mr. McNabb stated
that redevelopment funds can be used to float bonds.
2-19-91 Minutes
Page 10
Mr. Stone advised Council that this request was a one
time only request for funds from the City.
Mayor Boykin asked if the Community and Economic
Development Committee had any additional information?
Councilman Hafliger stated that the Committee and City
was being given a very short time to make a decision
and there was additional information that was needed,
i.e., the category of handicapped persons, an agenda
for their daily schedules, a needs assessment, numbers
of staff and type. Mr. Stone stated that it was a
violation of Federal Law to define the type of handicap
and illegal to restrict, but not illegal to give first
priority to residents of San Jacinto (Hemet, Valley).
Second priority would be given to those working in the
City. Councilman Hafliger stated that he and
Councilwoman Leahy had only been made aware of this
project two weeks ago. Mayor Boykin stated that he and
other members of the Council had notice of project only
upon receipt of their Agenda packet. Councilman Ford
inquired if the project was a complete restoration?
Mr. Stone stated yes, that current intent was to gut
inside and make a community center downstairs.
Councilwoman Leahy inquired what HIP's amount of
contribution would be? Mr. Stone stated that out-of-
pocket expenses to date were an appraisal of $6,000.
Councilman Ford inquired if there were any age
restrictions to project? Mr. Stone stated typically
that Federal guidelines dictated 62+ and head of
household or handicapped or disabled. Councilman Rose
inquired how long it would take to get the project off
the ground? Mr. Stone stated that at the close of
escrow, HIP would have their architect move forward.
Councilwoman Leahy asked if the project would fulfill
the City's obligation to low and moderate income
housing. Mr. McNabb stated that it would add to the
City's number of low/moderate income units, but 83
units will not totally fulfill its identified need.
Mayor Boykin inquired of City Attorney Cox if there was
a requirement to notify residents in the area? City
Attorney Cox stated he had not reviewed the proposal
prior to tonight and am not sure, but appears project
is the type of project that is consistent with
redevelopment plan. Mr. Cox further stated that
verification of expenditures from the Agency should be
checked and securing of proper agreements. Mr. Cox was
not sure at this time if a Conditional Use Permit would
be required. Mr. McNabb stated that zoning at this
point would be unknown; R-3 requires a conditional use
permit for this size, but SV designation requires the
redevelopment plan be presented at a Public Hearing.
Mr. McNabb further allowed that congregate care may
not need a zone change, but a public hearing.
2-19-91 Minutes
Page 11
Councilman Hafliger stated that he would be remiss in
approving this item at this point.
Motion by Councilman Hafliger to deny request for redevelopment funds
for reasons discussed this evening without prejudice.
Seconded by Councilwoman Leahy.
Motion carried: 4-1 (Ford voting nay)
Councilman Hafliger suggested that Item VII-B be brought forward at this
time to allow the youth in the audience to make their presentation and
leave at an earlier hour than now scheduled.
Mayor Boykin moved VII-B - Community Awareness Rally - Mistletoe Park
to proceed V-D.
Mr. Gonzales, 139 Algona, appeared before Council to
request approval for a Community Awareness Rally to
be held at Mistletoe Park on March 2, 1991. Mr.
Gonzales advised the Council that the group's boxing
program had received recognition throughout the State
and in the audience tonight were many youth and parents
to show support.
Mayor Boykin inquired if just the Awareness Rally was
being requested at this time? Mr. Gonzales stated yes.
Councilwoman Leahy suggested the group contact the
Jaycees for insurance.
Mark Mollica, 25585 Eastwood Place, small claims Judge
in Hemet for the past year, spoke in support of program
as he feels he has an insight into the problem and that,
with increasing population, the problems will only
compound. Mr. Mollica stated that Valley Wide does not
address the problems of the youth that are here in the
audience tonight. Mr. Mollica further stated that
boxing teaches discipline.
Mr. Richard Perry, 739 Alpine St., Hemet, testified to a
drug and alcohol prevention program that Mr. Gonzales
had put together (ADAPG) requiring that the participants
maintain: 1. no school absenteeism, 2. C grade point
average and 3. no misconduct is acceptable.
Councilwoman Leahy volunteered that her 18-year old son
had said it was quite a group and a worthwhile program.
Mayor Boykin brought forward the request here at hand is
to authorize the use of Mistletoe Park on March 2, 1991,
from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
City Manager Easter referred the discussion to Police
Chief Kozma. Chief Kozma stated he was willing to work
to the success of program particularly in Hispanic
community. Chief Kozma advised that a Certificate of
2-19-91 Minutes
Page 12
Compliance (completed by the responsible party) would be
required showing the name of the group, the place and
time of activity. Mr. Gonzales was also advised that
the Valley Teen Task Force Coordinator will be
contacting him and that he should contact the YMCA and
Valley -Wide.
Motion by Councilman Rose authorizing the use of Mistletoe Park for a
Community Awareness Rally on March 2, 1991 at Mistletoe Park, provided
the same procedures are followed as for all events being conducted at a
public facility.
Seconded by Councilman Ford.
Motion carried: 5-0.
D. 5-Points Signalization and Main Street Traffic
Circulation Update - Joe Kozma and Brian McNabb
Joe Kozma gave presentation on the 5-points
Signalization and Main Street Traffic Circulation
Update. This project being surfaced at this time due to
the completion of the Main Street water lines, and
desire for direction from Council.
Councilman Hafliger inquired if there had been a decline
of traffic downtown since the relocation of the Post
Office. Joe Kozma relayed that there had been a
decrease. Joe Kozma stated that there was $105,000
available for the signalization of "5 Points" and
$186,000 available for resurfacing Main Street from 5
Points, easterly.
Mr. McNabb advised that the problem at this time is that
the project has been inactive for some time and the
funds have been placed into a central "pot" and the City
must now petition the Riverside County Transportation
Commission to be placed on the Riverside County
Transportation Improvement Programs list. Cal Trans
advises that the earliest date for getting back on the
funding list will be in the 1992/93 Fiscal Year.
City Manager Easter inquired if the City Council would
like a Committee formed to look into the problem of the
Cal Trans funding and the legality of parallel parking.
Mayor Boykin stated that if Councilwoman Leahy and
Councilman Hafliger were willing to try and resolve the
matter with Staff support by contacting the appropriate
area groups, Joe Kozma would head up and Brian McNabb
would assist in the process.
Joe Kozma advised that it would be approximately 30 days
before preliminary findings could be delivered to
Council.
2-19-91 Minutes
Page 13
VI. CITY CLERK
A. Health Benefits for Elected Officials.
Maurice Armster, City Clerk, requested clarification of
Council's January, 1986 Minute action intent in allowing
City Council members to participate in the City's
health insurance program for self and dependent at no
cost to Council person, (as provided for Management
classified personnel.)
Councilman Ford stated that, at the present time, no
Council members were receiving health benefits provided
through the City. Mayor Boykin stated he was opposed to
the City providing insurance coverage/payment of
premiums and feels it should be eliminated. Mayor
Boykin further stated that he would support health
benefits for elected officials only if the premium were
borne at the official's expense.
Motion by Councilwoman Leahy to amend the Council Minutes of January 21,
1986, making health benefits available to all elected officials at no
cost to the City.
Seconded by Councilman Rose.
Motion carried: 5-0.
VII, MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/COMMENTS
A. Establishing location for Russian Marker in San
Jacinto (Hofmann) Memorial Park and authorization of
dedication date of May 25, 1991.
Motion by Mayor Boykin authorizing the Museum Association to locate the
Gromov marker in designated area and use the date of May 25, 1991, as
the dedication date.
Seconded by Councilman Ford.
Motion carried: 5-0.
Jeannette Hofmann, when questioned by Council as to a
name for the Park, deferred to Council.
Councilwoman Leahy stated that the Park lends toward a
Memorial Park as the Gromov Memorial will be placed in
the Park, as well as, the planned Memorial Walk.
Glen Miller, 1790 North Carry St., stated the Park
should remain Hofmann Park as it was started by them
many years ago.
Councilman Ford stated he felt Council should wait until
the second meeting in March for a decision.
2-19-91 Minutes
Page 14
Motion by Councilman Hafliger to use the name of Hofmann Park for the
currently designated Hofmann/Memorial Park.
Motion seconded by Councilman Rose.
Motion carried: 5-0.
Jeannette Hofmann gave an update on the fund raisers
planned for the benefit of the Park.
Councilwoman Leahy inquired in the Fire Department was
looking into the ambulance/paramedic provram. Chief
Chadwick stated that a meeting was set with the City
Manager on February 25, to discuss this program.
Councilwoman Leahy requested recommendations for water
conservation. City Manager Easter advised that she
and Water Superintendent Townsel were developing water
conservation methods and would have them available at
the second Council meeting in March. She additionally
stated that selling construction water will be included
in the comprehensive recommendation. Mrs. Leahy
further advised that Mr. Howe's (Planning
Commissioner) residence was no longer in the City of
San Jacinto. Mr. McNabb advised that this was correct
and that Mr. Howe's Commission seat needed to be
filled. Councilwoman Leahy further complimented the
Fire Department on their controlled burn on Ramona.
Mayor Boykin advised Council and audience that Friday,
February 25, 1991, was to be designated as "Yellow
Ribbon Day" and that activities would be held at
Hofmann Park from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. and invited
all of Staff and Council to join in.
Motion by Councilman Rose to adjourn to March 5, 1991.
Seconded by Councilman Ford.
Motion carried: 5-0.
Meeting adjourned at 12:47 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Approved by:
Maurice Armster,
City Clerk
Nancy Randolph
Deputy City Clerk
��,CIT� G� SA� JACINTO
CHECK
RE8I�vE!- GF �UDITED DEMANDS PAG�` 1
UNITED CALTFD�N�A D�N� A/C 201398
ISSUED TO
24495* O+K. ASSDC^ INC^
24496* PUBLIC EMP^ RET^ SYSTE�
24497* CITY OF INDIO
24498* S,J, WORKERS' COMP^
24499* CITY OF SAN JACINTO
24500* C1YY OF S4N JACINTO
24501* DENNIS LOVE
24502INTIL COUNCIL SHOpPINB
24503* F;lIV, CO. FLOOD COhTROL
24511 FRANK STEENPORT
24512 BILL RUT1 ---E1:18E
24513 DAVID VER F,LANK
24514 R8BERT W^ HOWE
24515 GLENN TAYLOR
24516 1-,�1 LOCK & KEY
24517 Al & T LAN8U�GE �INE
24518 BRUCE ABBE
24519 ADLERHORST INT+ INC^
24520 hLPHA BETA
24521 ANADY'S TROHPIES
24522 RALPH ANDERSON & ASSC+
24523 LOUIS R, ARROYA° JR+
24524 ARROW PRINTING
24525 E"S^ BABCOCK & SONS
24526 BOB+S L'OMBER
24527 JOHN R+ BYERLY
24528 CALLAGHAN & CO.
24529 CHEROKEE LANDSCAPE
24530 CHRISTIE STEEL
24531 CITY OF SAh JAC%NTO
24532 SALVADOR VILLARINO
24533 NELLIE ILQG
24534 JAMES ROWLAND
24�35 LEONEL G, �RELLAND
24536 RICHARD FOSS
24537 ` SILVI#O PONCE
24538 C^B,M. GROUP
2453� M°L° HANSEN
2454O A8USTIN MEDINA
24541 ROBERT WELTY
24542 LOUIS SEPULVEDA
24543 COM SET;, CO,
24544 CUTLER GTEEL CU^
24545 DEPT. QENERAL SERVICE
24546 DEWEY'S ELECTRIC
2�547 DI�IE USA^ INC,
24548 EASTE�� MUNI.WATER
24549 E^M^P.
2�550 EMPIRE O1L
�4551 F.C,C^
24552 STEVE FILA�SKY
�ESC�IPTION
REFUS[ COLLECTIONS
R�TIREME. NT
HAYOR/COUNCIL DINNER
REIMBUPS� ACCOUNT
CHECK I RINTING CHARGES~'EDISON
CIA ECK PAINTIN8 CHARGES -GAS
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT'^P~D+
l YR� �EMBERSHIP
INSPECTION FEE^DISCHARGE WATER
TUITIO�� REIMBURSEMENT~P^D^
PC MEETING
PC MEETING
PC MEETING
PC MEETING
SERVID^
LANGUAG[ LINE�P`D^
RFIHB, �ILEAGE�WATER DEPT^
TICK' FDJD�P'D^
SGPP~ CIyIC & P^D"
VEGA
DE�ELO� PSIM MODEL^P+D^
JANITO.1. SERVICE
10�� }��SINE55 LICENSE/S
LAB TESTS
CG>��RETE~P^W^
CDMPACTION TEST
PUBLICATIONS -LEGAL UPDATES
LANDSC�F,E MAINTENANCE
STEEL ��ATEG~PARK RESTROOMS
CO�SUM[� DEPOSITS
CDH8UMET, DEPOSITS
CO��UMER DEPOSIT�
CGNSUM�A
CG�SOME�
CGSUME�
--II UMEP
CO;NSUF!E�
COHSUMEA
CG��SUMER
DEPOSITS
DEPOSITS
DEPOSITS
DEPOSITS
DEPOSITS
DE�OSITS
DEPOSIT
DEPOSITS
COHSUM�R DEPOSITS
��PAIRS~ALL DEPARTMENTS
PGWER D�ILL & HAMMER�WATE|l DEPT^
SOUEBOOK-P^D,
�EI�BU�gEMENT FOF� DAMAGES
#ETT�� TAG-F.D^
�rI�ITIES
�EDIC�L �RO�UCTS~F^�
F{/EL
R,�QID �ILING FEE~CIVIC �ENTER
P�OFES�lONAL SE�VICE
64,157,69
18,394,52
45^OO
17843.80
28^30
25^38
43^33
20O,OO
50O^O0
11^93
1O0+OO
1OO+OO
1O0^O0
10O.00
18�3~O?
125^00
1O3^O8
7i°99
53"95
13^31
4/889^84
1�214^O0
93,99
24"O0
it. 02^24
672.50
175^85
2�4O0^03
138^45
4�360^89
19+1O
19^70
4^86
41"86
11^87
18^�8
85^44
391.5(
18.1O
29^56
3^74
350^49
718,41
179.4("
250^OO
8�^0O
778^79
11,931-99
35^O0
GLCD12
~
�F S��� JACIHTO
�EGISTE1 ED DEMANDS PAGE 2
CHECK
UNITED CIA/C 2O1398 DATF
ISSUED TO
24553 OFELIA FIERRO
24554 11131T MUNICIPAL DIVISION
24555 GTE MOBILE COMM^
24556 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO,
24557 HEMET HEATING & COOLING
24558 HEMET NEWS
24559 HEMET POLICE DEPT^
2456O R8BTT, HENDERSON INC^
24561 HOT SHOTS J. HOUR PHOT)
24562 HUB CDN8TRUCTION
24563 INLAND FOUNDATION ENG^I
24564 KERN EQUIPT' CO.
24565 JUAN T^ LOPEZ
245�6 AMETEK/MC CROMETER DIkj^
24567 MARDEN.... SUSCO
24560 LAURIE MORA
24569 MOSS BROTHERS
24570 NATIONAL POLY FILMS
24571 PACKHAM & TOOMEY, INC"
24572 PACTEL CELLULAR -LA
24573 P^S^ HARLEY.... DAV1DSON
24574 PAGENET
24575 P^D^ PETTY CASH
�4576 SAN JACINTO FIRE DEPT~
24577 PLATINUM SYSTEMS
24578 RACEWAY FORD
24579 RAMONA BUSINESS MACHI�E
24580 NANCY RANDGLPH
24581 MIKE READE CHEV,
24582 RED WING SHOES
24583 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
24584 RiDE CD^ LAW ENF^+
24585 GAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM
24586 S^J+ CHAMBER COMMERCE
24587 SAN JACINTO WORKERS^ ck"'O
24588 SCOTIA TECH+DEV^
24389 SCOTSMAN ���NUFACTURINB
24590 SO^ �ALIFORNIA EDISON
24591 STEVE^S AUTO PARTS
24592 T�C EXTERMINATORS
24593 TIGER TEMP
24594 TRAVEL EMP8RIUM
245�5 U,S^ POST�ASTER
W� 24596 DAVE RREN
FOND lO 55,212.50
FOND 14 496^44
FUND Zl 1,004.13
FOND 23 1,289-79
FUND 25 7,458.14
�ODD 29 267.50
DESC1 IPTIGN
REIMB���E MILEAGE-COMM, CENTER
BROOMS�W-EPER LEASE
MOBILE TELEPHONE
TEL, CJ�M^
�EPAIRS-COMM^ CENTER
ADVEkTISING
�SSET �OR�EITURE ACCDUNT
P;�GFES�IONAL SERVICEGAL
FILM P��DCESSING-P^D^
CONCRET� TOOLS
CO��PAC�ION TEST
P�RTS U��IT ��423~SWEEPER
2 DAY 1:'�ETREAT/COUNCIi MEETING
�EPAIR �ETER
WTRPIPE & SUPPLJES
SCHDOL TUITI8N REIMBURSEMENT
S��ITCH ~FIRE CHIEFS VEI--IICLE
OVERP;�Y��EHT-WATER BILL
3 L TANK TESTING
TELEPH���E^P^D^ & C^M^
REPAIR �DTORCYCLE
RENTAL RADIO PAGERS
PDPETTY CASH
PETTY C�SH
6� HG� IBM INSTALLATION
P��RTS~P,D, VEHICLE
REP�IR TYPEWRING
REIMB^ ��RAMES~''MISSION STATEMENT''
VE��ICLE PARTS~P°D^
5 PR' �DOTS~WATER DEPARTMENT
RELEAS�� ASSET F0�FEITURE
PDLICE CHIEF MEMBERSHlP
BROOMS ^` SWEEPER
RA��ONA �AGEANT BAANFR
REIHBU��E ACCOUNT
TOHER~~BUILDING DEPARTHENT
MON,THLY LEASE-P.D+
UTILITY
VEHICL� PARTS
SPR�YI�� AT C.C^
TEHPO[�ARY F'OWER^C.F^D^ 11-2
Al� FAR�^£ASTE|�/ICMA
NEWSLETTER -BULK MAIL
TUITI�p |�E^W,
ST�EET SIGNS
FUND 31 561,33
FUND 36 1,387,50
FUND 40 1,565,25
FOND 50 7,867.95
FUND 65 69,163.4�
�U�D 86 6,6l599
13^65
1/565^?5
260.21
1,356^76
1l2^50
52.75
196^15
444^0O
16O^93
1'288v79
267,50
7O^18
3�891^4O
111.41
34+O8
72^21
29^77
57^15
675^0O
781v13
120°67
126^00
68^69
24^40
1^887^OO
24.00
90+O0
51+00
4OO,76
436^39
1,53O^OO
5O~0O
134^70
65.00
402^42
111^83
P16^17
5/965^O7
�09^50
43^50
215°O0
55^50
692^00
124~69
1,296^28
FUND 96 200.00 --
PayroII 18.394.52
Miuc.-Wot= 57.15
TOTAL �l7l,y0U.66
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
TREASURER'S OFFICE
TIME DEPOSIT REGISTER
Bank & Acct. No. Issued Maturity Rate Amt. Inv. Int. this Mo.
State of California
9833794 02-20-85 Open 7.929 4,900,000.
Red. 5133120 01-19-88 Open 7.929 1,600,000.
Great Western
389-600153-8 01-04-91 CLOSED 7.150 FUNDS TO LAIF 198.61
389-602847-3 12-26-90 CLOSED 7.600 FUNDS TO LAIF 6,016.67
389-606357-9 01-07-91 04-08-91 7.300 700,000.
Far West Savings
013-10432-8 01-15-91 04-15-91 7.900 98,000. 602.15
Red. 013-14016-5 01-15-91 04-15-91 7.900 98,000. 602.15
013-16299-5 01-30-91 04-15-91 7.600 98,000. 579.29
Home Savings
107-022764-8 01-08-91 03-09-91 7.400 300,000. 3205.75
Total Invested $7,794,000. $ 11,204.62
February 1991 Register
Federal I.D. No. 95-6000780
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
TREASURER'S OFFICE
TIME DEPOSIT REGISTER
CIVIC CENTER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT BONDS
Bank & Acct. No. Issued
Great Western Bank
389-603896-9 01-07-91
389-603897-7 02-21-91
389-607952-6 02-21-91
Home Savings
107-022762-2 01-30-91
107-022769-7 01-12-91
February 1991 Register
Federal I.D. No. 95-6000780
Maturity Rate Amt. Inv. Int. This Mo.
04-08-91
03-11-91
03-11-91
7.300
6.050
6.050
03-11-91 6.900
04-08-91 7.400
1,200,000.
1,420,000.
50,000.
100,000.
1,200,000.
5,640.56
195.83
1,186.81
6,906.67
Total Invested $3,970,000. $13,929.87
a
MEMORANDUM
FIDEi T
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
FROM: Nancy Randolph, Deputy City Clerk
DATE: February 28, 1991
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO FIREFIGHTERS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Attached is a proposed amendment to the San Jacinto Firefighters
Association, with an effective date of February 1, 1991. As
discussed with you during an Executive Session on January 22, 1991,
this additional health benefit is part of the Police Association
MOU.
During early settlement of the San Jacinto Firefighters
Association, it was agreed that any additional medical benefits
allowed to the Police Department during extended negotiations,
would be applied to the Firefighters also, upon ratification by the
City Council.
Jim Cox, who served as Chief Negotiator has drafted the attached
language for your review.
AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN
CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA AND
SAN JACINTO FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION
This agreement is executed this day of March,
1991 for the purpose of amending that certain Memorandum of
Understanding between the City of San Jacinto and the San Jacinto
Firefighters Association, executed on August 8, 1990.
IT IS HEREBY AGREED that Paragraph 5.4 of said Memorandum
of Understanding be amended to read as follows:
"5.4 Health Insurance: Effective February 1, 1991, the
City will contribute on behalf of full-time regular employees and
their dependents a maximum of $291.00 per monUI towards the health
insurance premium coverage plans currently in effect."
San Jacinto Firefighters Association
By:
Representative
City of San Jacinto
By:
City Manager
MEMO
AGE D
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: March 1, 1991
SUBJ: REDUCTION OF PERFORMANCE BONDS FOR TRACT 16811
Tract 16811, Park Hill Village, was approved by the County of
Riverside in the early 1980's and subsequently annexed to the City.
As the map recorded while the property was yet in the County, the
bonds were posted and are still held by the County.
A substantial amount of work has been completed and has been
accepted, yet the bonds have never been reduced. The County cannot
act on a reduction because the project is now in the City. The
City must direct the County to take the action. Approval of the
item on the consent calendar will allow staff to tell the County
to reduce the performance bond.
The attached letter requests a reduction to $162,300. In reviewing
this request and the improvements yet to be completed, staff feels
$300,000 is a more appropriate amount.
Staff therefore recommends a reduction of the performance bond for
Tract 16811 to $300,000.
AGENDA
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
FROM: Nancy Randolph, Deputy City Clerk
DATE: February 28, 1991
SUBJECT: WRCOG Joint Powers Agreement
Attached is a proposed revised Joint Powers Agreement for the
Western Riverside Council of Governments. The City of San
Jacinto has been requested to consider adoption of this Agree-
ment that allows membership of the new city of Canyon Lake,
which has been requested by Resolution of their City Council
and authorization of memberships of the new cities of Calimesa
and Murrieta. The Agreement has been revised to allow all
future new cities to join.
City Attorney, Jim Cox, has reviewed the Agreement and has approved
the language and intent.
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT OF
THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
This Agreement is made and entered into on the day
of , 1991, pursuant to Government Code Section
6500 et. seq. and other pertinent provisions of law, by and between
six or more of the following cities located within Western Riverside
County and the County of Riverside--.
(a) City of Banning
(c) City of Corona
(d) City of Hcmct
(c) City of Lake Elsinore
(f) City of Moreno Valley
(g) City of Norco
(h) City cf Ferris
(i) City of Rivcrsidc
(j) City of Can Jacinto
(k) City of Temecula
RECITALS
A. Each member and party to this Agreement is a
governmental entity established by law with full powers of
government in legislative, administrative, financial, and other
related fields.
B. The purpose of the formation is to provide an agency to
conduct studies and projects designed to improve and coordinate the
common governmental responsibilities and services on an area -wide
and regional basis through the establishment of an association of
governments. The A,zociation Council will explore areas of inter-
governmental -cooperation and coordination of government programs and
provide recommendations and solutions to problems of common and
general concern.
C. When authorized pursuant to an Implementation Agreement,
the A,zociation Council shall manage and administer thereunder.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and
covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.
PURPOSE AND POWERS
1.1 Agency Created.
There is hereby created a public entity to be known as the
"Western Riverside Association Council of Governments" ("WRAC")
("WRCOG"). WRAC WRCOG is formed by this Agreement pursuant to the
provision of Government Code Section 6500 et. seq. and other
pertinent provision of law. WRAG WRCOG shall be a public entity
separate from the parties hereto.
1.2 Powers.
1.2.1. WRAC WRCOG established hereunder shall perform
all necessary functions to fulfill the purposes of this Agreement.
Among other functions, WRAC WRCOG shall:
a. Serve as a forum for consideration, study and
recommendation on area -wide and regional problems;
b. Assemble information helpful in the consideration o-r
problems peculiar to Western Riverside County;
c. Explore practical avenues for intergovernmental
cooperation, coordination and action in the interest of local
public welfare and means of improvements in the administration of
governmental services; and
d. Serve as the clearinghouse review body for
Federally -funded projects in accordance with Circular A-95 in
conjunction with the Southern California Association of
Governments.
1.2.2. The Association Council shall have tile power in
its own name to do any of the following;
a. When necessary for the day to day operation of the
Association Council, to make and enter into contracts;
b. To contract for the services of engineers,
attorneys, planners, financial consultants and separate and apart
therefrom to employ such other persons, as it deems necessary;
c. To apply for an appropriate grant or grants under any federal,
state, or local programs.
d. To receive gifts, contributions and donations of
property, funds, services and other forms of financial assistance
from persons, firms, corporations and any governmental entity;
e. To lease, acquire, construct, manage, maintain, and
operate any buildings, works, or improvements;
f. To delegate some or all of its powers to the
Executive Committee and the executive Director of the Association
Council as hereinafter provided.
1.2.3 The association shall have the power in its owTi
name, only with the approval of all affected member agencies to;
3
a. Acquire, hold and dispose of property by eminent
domain, lease, lease purchase or sale.
b. To incur debts, liabilities, obligations, and
issue bonds;
11.
ORGANIZATION OF ASSOCIATION COUNCIL
2.1 Parties.
The parties to WRAC WRCOG shall be the County of Riverside
and each city located within Western Riverside County which has
executed or hereafter executes this Agreement, or any addenda,
amendment, or supplement thereto and agrees to such become a member
upon such teams and conditions as established by the general council
or executive committee, and which has not, pursuant to provisions
hereof, withdrawn therefrom.
2.2 Names.
The names, particular capacities and addresses of the parties
at any time shall be shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, as
amended or supplemented from time to time.
2.3 Duties.
WRAG WRCOG shall do whatever is necessary and required to
carry out the purposes of this agreement and when authorized by an
Implementation Agreement pursuant to section 1.2.3 as appropriate,
to make and enter into such contracts, incur such debts and
obligations, assess contributions from the members, and perfollLt such
other acts as are necessary to the accomplishment of the purposes of
such agreement, within the provisions of Government Code Section
6500 et seq. and as prescribed by the laws of the State of --
California.
4
2.4 Governing Body.
2.4.1. WRAG WRCOG shall be governed by a General Assembly
with membership consisting of the appropriate representatives from
the County of Riverside and each city which is a signatory to this
Agreement, the number of which shall be determined as hereinafter
set forth. The General Assembly shall meet at least once annually,
preferably scheduled in the evening. Each member agency of the
General Assembly shall have one vote for each mayor, council member
or county supervisor present at the General Assembly. The General
Assembly shall act only upon a majority of a quorum. A quorum shall
consist of a majority of the total authorized representatives,
provided that members representing a majority of the member agencies
are present. The General Assembly shall adopt and amend by-laws for
the administration and management of this Agreement, which when
adopted and approved shall be an integral part of this Agreement.
Such by-laws may provide for the management and administration of
this Agreement.
2.4.2. There shall be an Executive Committee which
exercises the powers of this Agreement between sessions of the
General Assembly. Members of the Executive Committee shall be the
Mayor from each of the member cities and four members of the
Riverside County Board of Supervisors, the remaining member of the
Board of Supervisors shall serve as an alternate, except any City
Council, at its discretion, can appoint a Mayor Pro Tem or other
city council member in place of the Mayor. The Executive Committee
shall act only upon a majority of a quorum. A quorum shall consist-.
of a majority of the member agencies.
2.4.3. Each member of the General Assembly and the
Executive Committee shall be a current member of the legislative
body such member represents.
2.4.4. Each participating member on the Executive
Committee shall also have an alternate, who must also be a
current member of the legislative body of the party such
alternate represents. The name of the alternate members shall
be on file with the Executive Committee. In the absence of the
regular member from an agency, the alternate member_ from such
agency shall assume all rights and duties of the absent regular
member.
2.5 Executive Director.
The Executive Director shall be the chief administrative
officer of the Council. He shall receive such compensation as may
be fixed by the Executive Committee. The powers and duties of the
Executive Director shall be subject to the authority of the
Executive Committee and include the following:
a. To appoint, direct and remove employees of the
Council.
b. Annually to prepare and present a proposed budget to
the Executive Committee and General Assembly.
c. Serve as Secretary of the Council and of the
Executive Committee.
d. To attend meetings of the Executive Committee.
e. To perform such other and additional duties as the
Executive Committee may require.
2.6 Principal Office.
The principal office of WRAC WRCOG shall be established by
the Executive Committee and shall be located within Western
Riverside County. The Executive Committee is hereby granted full
power and authority to change said principal office from one
location to another within Western Riverside County. Any change
shall be noted by the Secretary under this section but shall not be
considered an amendment to this Agreement.
2.7 Meetings.
The Executive Committee shall meet at the principal
office of the agency or at such other place as may be designated by
the Executive Committee. The time and place of regular meetings
of the Executive Committee shall be determined by resolution adopted
by the Executive Committee; a copy of such resolution shall be
furnished to each party hereto. Regular, adjourned and special
meetings shall be called and conducted in accordance with the
provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act, Government Code Section
54950 et. seq., as it may be amended.
2.8 Powers and Limitations of the Executive Committee.
Unless otherwise provided herein, each member or
participating alternate of the Executive Committee shall be entitled
to one vote, and a vote of the majority of those present and
qualified to vote constituting a quorum may adopt any motion,
resolution, or order and take any other action they deem
appropriate to carry forward the objectives of the Council.
2.9 Minutes.
The secretary of the A,r_-;ociation Council shall cause to I=
kept minutes of regular adjourned regular and special meetings of
the General Assembly and Executive Committee, and shall cause a copy
of the minutes to be forwarded to each member and to each of the
members hereto.
2.10 Rules.
The Executive Committee may adopt from time to time such
rules and regulations for the conduct of its affairs consistent
with this agreement or any Implementation Agreement.
2.11 Vote or Assent of Members.
The vote, assent or approval of the meft117ers in any manner
as may be required, hereunder shall be evidenced by a certified copy
of the action of the governing body of such party filed with the
As-ociatien Council. It shall be the responsibility of the
Executive Director to obtain certified copies of said actions_
2.12 Officers.
There shall be selected from the membership of the
Executive Committee, a chairperson and a vice chairperson. The
Executive Director shall be the secretary. The Treasurer of the
County of Riverside shall be the Treasurer of the Association
Council and the Controller or Auditor of the County of Riverside
shall be the Auditor of the Association Council. Such persons shall
possess the powers of, and shall perform the treasurer and auditor
functions respectively, for WPAG WRCOG and performperforiii those functions
required of them by Government Code Sections 6505, 6505.5 and
6505.6, and by all other applicable laws and regulations, including
any subsequent amendments thereto.
The chairperson and vice chairperson, shall hold office
for a period of one year commencing July 1st of each and every
fiscal year; provided, however, the first chairperson and vice
chairperson appointed shall hold office from the date of appointment
to June 30th of the ensuing fiscal year. Except for the Executive
Director, any officer, employee, or agent of the Executive
Committee may also be an officer, employee, or agent of any of the
members. The appointment by the Executive Committee of such a
person shall be evidence that the two positions are compatible.
2.13 Committees.
The Executive Committee may, as it deems appropriate,
appoint committees to accomplish the purposes set forth herein. All
committee meetings of WRAC WRCOG, including those of the Executive
Committee, shall be open to all members.
2.14 Additional Officers and Employees.
The Executive Committee shall have the power to authorize
such additional officers and assistants as may be appropriate. Such
officers and employees may also be, but are not required to be,
officers and employees of the individual members.
2.15 Bonding Requirement.
The officers or persons who have charge of, handle, or
have access to any property of WRAG WRCOG shall be the members of
the Executive Committee, the treasurer, the Executive Director, and
any other officers or persons to be designated or empowered by the
Executive Committee. Each such officer or person shall be required
to file an official bond with the Executive Committee in an amount
which shall be established by the Executive Committee. Should the
existing bond or bonds of any such officer be extended to cover the
obligations provided herein, said bond shall be the official bond
required herein. The premiums on any such bonds attributable to the
coverage required herein shall be appropriate expenses of WRAG
WRCOG.
2.16 Status of Officers and Employees.
All of the privileges and immunities from liability,
exemption from laws, ordinances and rules, all pension, relief,
disability, worker's compensation, and other benefits which apply to
the activity of officers, agents, or employees of any of the members
when performing their respective functions shall apply to them to
the same degree and extent while engaged in the perfoLmance of
any of the functions and other duties under this Agreement. None of
the officers, agents, or employees appointed by the Executive
Committee shall be deemed, by reason of their employment by the
Executive Committee, to be employed by any of the members or, by
reason of their employment by the Executive Committee, to be subject
to any of the requirements of such members.
2.17 Restrictions.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 6509, for the purposes of
determining the restrictions to be imposed by the Council in its
exercise of the above -described joint powers, reference shall be
made to, and the Council shall observe, the restrictions imposed
upon the County of Riverside.
III
FUNDS AND PROPERTY
3.1. Treasurer.
The Treasury of the member agency whose Treasurer is the -
Treasurer for WRAC WRCOG shall be the depository for WRAC, WRCOG.
The Treasurer of the Council shall have custody of all funds and
shall provide for strict accountability thereof in accordance with
Government Code Section 6505.5 and other applicable laws of the
State of California. He or she shall perform all of the duties
required in Government Code Section 6505 and following, such other
duties as may be prescribed by the Executive Committee.
3.2. Expenditure of Funds.
The funds under this Agreement shall be expended only in
furtherance of the purposes hereof and in accordance with the laws
of the State of California and standard accounting practices
shall be used to account for all funds received and disbursed.
3.3. Fiscal Year.
WRAC WRCOG shall be operated on a fiscal year basis,
beginning on July 1 of each year and continuing until June 30 of the
succeeding year. Prior to July 1 of each year, the General Assembly
shall adopt a final budget for the expenditures of WRAG WRCOG during
the following fiscal Year.
3.4. Contributions/Public Funds.
In preparing the budget, the General Assembly by majority
vote of a quorum shall detelmine the amount of funds which will be
required from its members for the purposes of this Agreement. The
funds required from its members after approval of the final budget
shall be raised by contributions 50% of which will be assessed on a
per capita basis and 50% on an assessed valuation basis, each city
paying on the basis of its population and assessed valuation and the
County paying on the basis of the population and assessed
11
valuation within the unincorporated area of Western Riverside County
as defined in the by-laws. The parties, when informed of their
respective contributions, shall pay the same before August lst of
the fiscal year for which they are assessed or within sixty days of
being informed of the assessment, whichever occurs later. In
addition to the contributions provided, advances of public funds
from the parties may be made for the purposes of this Agreement.
When such advances are made, they shall be repaid from the first
available funds of WRAG WRCOG.
The General Assembly shall have the power to determine
that personnel, equipment or property of one or more of the parties
to the Agreement may be used in lieu of fund contributions or
advances.
All contributions and funds shall be paid to WR-COG and
shall be disbursed by a majority vote of a quorum of the Executive
Committee, as authorized by the approved budget.
IV
BUDGETS AND DISBURSEMENTS
4.1 Annual Budget.
The Executive Committee may at any time amend the budget
to incorporate additional income and disbursements that might become
available to WRAC WRCOG for its purposes during a fiscal year.
4.2 Disbursements.
The Executive Director shall request warrants from the
Auditor in accordance with budgets approved by the General Assembly
or Executive Committee subject to quarterly review by the Executive
Committee. The Treasurer shall pay such claims or disbursements ana
12
such requisitions for payment in accordance with rules, regulations,
policies, procedures and bylaws adopted by the Executive Committee.
4.3 Accounts.
All funds will be placed in appropriate accounts and the
receipt, transfer, or disbursement of such funds during the term of
this Agreement shall be accounted for in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles applicable to governmental entities
and pursuant to Government Code Sections 6505 et seq. and any other
applicable laws of the State of California. There shall be strict
accountability of all funds. All revenues and expenditures shall be
reported to the Executive Committee.
4.4 Expenditures Within Approved Annual Budget.
All expenditures shall be made within the approved
annual budget. No expenditures in excess of those budgeted shall be
made without the approval of a majority of a quorum of the Executive
Committee.
4.5 Audit.
The records and accounts of WRAC WRCOG shall be audited
annually by an independent certified public accountant and copies of
such audit report shall be filed with the County Auditor, State
Controller and each party to WRAC WRCOG no later than fifteen (15)
days after receipt of said audit by the Executive Committee.
4.6 Reimbursement of Funds.
Grant funds received by W-RA-G WRCOG from any federal,
state, or local agency to pay for budgeted expenditures for which
WR-COG has received all or a portion of said funds from the parties
hereto shall be used as determined by WZAG'c WRCOG's Executive
Committee.
V
LIABILITIES
5.1 Liabilities.
The debts, liabilities, and obligation of WRAC WRCOG shall
be the debts, liabilities, or obligations of WRAG WRCOG alone and
not of the parties to this Agreement.
5.2 Hold Harmless and Indemnity.
Each party hereto agrees to indemnify and hold the other
parties harmless from all liability for damage, actual or alleged,
to persons or property arising out of or resulting from negligent
acts or omissions of the indemnifying party or its employees. Where
the General Assembly or Executive Committee itself or its agents or
employees are held liable for injuries to persons or property, each
party's liability for contribution or indemnity for such injuries
shall be based proportionately upon the contributions (less
voluntary contributions) of each member. In the event of liability
imposed upon any of the parties to this Agreement, or upon the
General Assembly or Executive Committee created by this Agreement,
for injury which is caused by the negligent or wrongful act or
omission of any of the parties in the performance of this Agreement,
the contribution of the party or parties not directly responsible
for the negligent or wrongful act or omission shall be limited
to One Hundred Dollars ($100.00). The party or parties directly
responsible for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions shall
indemnify, defend, and hold all other parties harmless from any
liability for personal injury or property damage arising out of the
perfo nuance of this Agreement. The voting for or against a matter
being considered by the General Assembly or executive or other
committee or WRAG WRCOG, or abstention from voting on such matter,
shall not be construed to constitute a wrongful act or omission
within the meaning of this Subsection.
VI
ADMISSION AND WITHDRAWAL OF PARTIES
6.1 Admission of New Parties.
It is recognized that additional cities other than the
original parties, may wish to participate in WRAC WRCOG. Additional
Any Western Riverside County citica city may become partic3 a party
to WAG WRCOG upon such terms and conditions as established by the
General Assembly or Executive Committee,_ and thc consent of
all of thc parties including the additional party. However, and
without compliance with thc foregoing, any of the twelve public
agencies listed on thc first page of thi-s—Pogre&matt-4t--attelti
and executing this Agreement and forwarding an attested ccpy of the
executed Agreement to the Executi,re Director,
4- •
(WRAC) within onc ycar of thc effective date of this agreement
defined by Section 9.3. Any Western Riverside County city shall
become a party to WRCOG by the adoption by the city council of this
agreement and the execution of a written addendum thereto agreeing
to the telms of this Agreement and agreeing to any additional terms
and conditions that may be established by the general assembly or
Executive Committee. Special districts which are significantly
involved in regional problems and the boundaries of which include
territory within the collective area of the membership shall
eligible for advisory membership in the Association Council. The
representative of any such advisory member may participate in the
work of committees of the Association Council.
6.2 Withdrawal from WRAC WRCOG.
It is fully anticipated that each party hereto shall
participate in WRAC WRCOG until the purposes set forth in
this Agreement are accomplished. The withdrawal of any party,
either voluntary or involuntary, unless otherwise provided by
the General Assembly or Executive Committee, shall be conditioned as
follows:
a. In the case of a voluntary withdrawal following a
properly noticed public hearing, written notice shall be given to
WRAG WRCOG, six months prior to the effective date of withdrawal;
b. Withdrawal shall not relieve the party of its
proportionate share of any debts or other liabilities incurred by
WRAC WRCOG prior to the effective date of the parties' notice of
withdrawal;
c. Unless otherwise provided by a unanimous vote of the
Executive Committee, withdrawal shall result in the forfeiture of
that party's rights and claims relating to distribution of property
and funds upon teLmination of WRAC WRCOG as set forth in Section VII
below;
d. Withdrawal from any Impiementation Agreement shall
not be deemed withdrawal from membership in WRAG WRCOG.
VII
TERMINATION AND DISPOSITION OF ASSETS
7.1 TeLiuination of this Agreement.
WRAC WRCOG shall continue to exercise the joint powers
herein until the teLmination of this Agreement and any extension
thereof or until the parties shall have mutually rescinded
this Agreement; providing, however, that WRAC WRCOG and this
Agreement shall continue to exist for the purposes of disposing of
all claims, distribution of assets and all other functions
necessary to conclude the affairs of WRAG WRCOG.
Termination shall be accomplished by written consent of
all of the parties, or shall occur upon the withdrawal from WRAG
WRCOG of a sufficient number of the agencies enumerated herein so as
to leave less than five of the enumerated agencies remaining in
WRAG WRCOG.
7.2 Distribution of Property and Funds.
In the event of the termination of this Agreement, any
property interest remaining in WRLC WRCOG following the discharge of
all obligations shall be disposed of as the Executive Committee
shall determine with the objective of distributing to each remaining
party a proportionate return on the contributions made to such
properties by such parties, less previous returns, if any.
VIII
IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENTS
8.1 Execution of Agreement.
When authorized by the Executive Committee, any affected
member agency or agencies enumerated herein, may execute an
Implementation Agreement for the purpose of authorizing WR-COG to
implement, manage and administer area -wide and regional programs in
the interest of the local public welfare. The costs incurred by
WRAC WRCOG in implementing a program including indirect costs, shall
be assessed only to those public agencies who are parties to that -
Implementation Agreement.
IX
MISCELLANEOUS
9.1 Amendments.
This Agreement may be amended with the approval of not
less than two-thirds (2/3) of all member agencies.
9.2 Notice.
Any notice or instrument required to be given or
delivered by depositing the same in any United States Post Office,
registered or certified, postage prepaid, addressed to the addresses
of the parties as shown on Exhibit
HAI!,
shall be deemed to have
been received by the party to whom the same is addressed at the
expiration of seventy-two (72) hours after deposit of the same in
the United States Post Office for transmission by registered or
certified mail as aforesaid.
9.3 Effective Date.
This Agreement shall be effective and WRAC WRCOG shall
exist from and after such date as this Agreement has been executed
by any seven or more of the public agencies, including the County of
Riverside, as listed on page 1 hereof.
9.4 Arbitration.
Any controversy or claim between any two or more
parties to this Agreement, or between any such party or parties and
WRAC WRCOG, with respect to disputes, demands, differences,
controversies, or misunderstandings arising in relation to
interpretation of this Agreement, or any breach thereof, shall be
submitted to and determined by arbitration. The party desiring to
initiate arbitration shall give notice of its intention to arbitratc-
to every other party to this Agreement and to the Executive Director
of the Association Council. Such notice shall designate as
"respondents" such other parties as the initiating party intends to
have bound by any award made therein. Any party not so designated
but which desires to join in the arbitration may, within ten (10)
days of service upon it of such notice, file with all other parties
and with the Executive Director of the Council a response indicating
its intention to join in and to be bound by the results of the
arbitration, and further designating any other parties it wishes
to name as a respondent. Within twenty (20) days of the service of
the initial demand for arbitration, the initiating party and the
respondent or respondents shall each designate a person to act as an
arbitrator. The designated arbitrators shall mutually designate the
minimal number of additional persons as arbitrators as may be
necessary to create an odd total number of arbitrators but not less
than three to serve as arbitrator(s).
The arbitrators shall proceed to arbitrate the matter in
accordance with the provisions of Title 9 of Part 3 of the Code of
Civil Procedure, Section 1280 et. seq. The parties to this
Agreement agree that the decision of the arbitrators will be binding
and will not be subject to judicial review except on the ground that
the arbitrators have exceeded the scope of their authority.
9.5 Partial Invalidity.
If any one or more of the terms, provisions, sections,
promises, covenants or conditions of this Agreement shall to any
extent be adjudged invalid, unenforceable, void or voidable for any
reason whatsoever by a court of competent jurisdiction, each and all
of the remaining terms, provisions, sections, promises, covenants
and conditions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and
shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by
law.
9.6 Successors.
This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to
the benefit of the successors of the parties hereto.
9.7 Assignment.
The parties hereto shall not assign any rights or
obligations under this Agreement without written consent of all
other parties.
9.8 Execution.
The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside and
the city councils of the cities enumerated herein have each
authorized execution of this Agreement. as evidenced by the
authorized signatures below, respectively.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
Dated:
By:
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Attest:
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
City Clerk CITY OF BANNING
City of Banning
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
By:
Mayor
City Clerk CITY OF CORONA
City of Corona
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
By:
Mayor
City Clerk CITY OF HEMET
City of Hemet
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
By:
Mayor
City Clerk CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE
City of Lake Elsinore
By:
Dated:
By:
Mayor
21
ATTEST:
City Clerk CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
City of Moreno Valley
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
By:
Mayor
City Clerk CITY OF NORCO
City of Norco
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
By:
Mayor
City Clerk CITY OF PERRIS
City of Perris
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
By:
Mayor
City Clerk CITY OF RIVERSIDE
City of Riverside
By:
Dated:
By:
Mayor
City Clerk CITY OF SAN JACINTO
City of San Jacinto
By:
By:
Dated:
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA
City of Temecula
By:
Dated:
By:
Mayor
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
rHOM: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: March 1, 1991
SUBJECT: Introduction of a New City Logo
Background
The City currently has an adopted City Seal, which defined in
Chapter 1.08, Section 1.08.010 of the Municipal Code is as follows:
"A horn of plenty spilling out fruit, potatoes and other
vegetables in the foreground and Mt. San Jacinto in the
background shall occupy the central space, surrounding which
in the circular margin shall appear the words "City of San
Jacinto, Founded 1870."
Staff is proposing that a logo be added for use in upcoming orders
of stationery, business cards, brochures and economic development
material. The purpose is to add the use of a logo, not to replace
the existing adopted City Seal. Many cities, including our nearby
City of Hemet, have adopted both a City Seal and logo.
Several circumstances have initiated the research into possibly
adding a logo to the City's graphic "bag of tricks". First of all,
the City Staff is working to develop an economic development packet
that will provide an informative and proactive image for the City.
The second is that the Seal on our current stationery does not
reproduce well. Thirdly, we are out of stock on our current
business cards, which are expensive, due to the paper stock and
four color reproduction.
We have worked with a nearby graphic artist and San Jacinto
printing firm to develop a logo that would be attractive, more
reasonable to print, and useable in our economic development and
other publication efforts. The logo incorporates the striking
presence of our surrounding mountains and agricultural roots
(through the blades of grass in the lower right hand corner). Our
economic development pieces would add buildings in front of the
foothills to symbolize the future business vitality of our City.
Page Two
Our Staff anticipates a phased -in use of the logo. It would be
immediately utilized in our economic development materials. As
business cards are ordered, we would also transition to use the
logo. This is necessary, so that our economic development packets
would also have coordinating business cards. As stationery was
reordered, a transition would also be made using the logo. We
would continue to utilize all existing paper products, until they
were exhausted.
The City Seal would not be replaced or supplanted. It would
continue to be used on official documents as well as other
products.
We had hoped to be able to provide you with a sample of the
proposed logo, but at the time of finalizing the agenda, we were
informed samples would not be available from Arrow Printing until
Tuesday. These will be given to you at the beginning of the
Council Meeting.
Recommendation
It is recommended that the City Council endorse the introduction
of a City logo to be used, as appropriate, in addition to the
adopted City Seal.
nr
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
FROM: Henry Garcia, Assistant City Manager
DATE: March 1, 1991
SUBJ: PROPOSED CLASSIFICATION/COMPENSATION STUDY
Background
In 1980, the City of San Jacinto contracted with Ralph Anderson and
Associates for consulting services to conduct a classification plan
of all City jobs. The study included the review of existing duties
and responsibilities of City positions as well as established
minimum qualifications for positions to ensure internal equity
between classes.
In the last ten (10) years, many changes have occurred which have
directly impacted the City of San Jacinto and its' employees.
Major factors which have affected San Jacinto and its' workforce
include:
1. Rapid growth of the area - 66% in the last four years.
2. Changes in the demographics of the employee population.
3. Advancements in office automation.
4. Mandatory compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act.
5. Shift in employee needs/requirements.
6. Escalating benefit costs.
As a result of these changes, staff recommends that an updated
comprehensive (in-house) classification and compensation study be
completed.
The Goal of the Study
The goal of the study will be to develop an accurate and current
class specification/compensation program which will provide the
City of San Jacinto with a tool that would allow employees the
benefits of performing more effectively in the following ways:
Develop an incremental way in which to increase salaries.
Page Two
* Develop staffing levels by identifying positions that are
overlapping or redundant.
Identify the responsibilities and duties requiring common
knowledge skills used in establishing classes, class series
and families of jobs for designing career development
programs.
* Reallocate tasks/responsibilities among various employees,
ensuring that activities are performed and making jobs more
interesting and vital to incumbents.
Determine and document relationship between pay system design
and class specifications.
Provide job data for comparison of internally equitable and
externally competitive data to be used for designing a pay
structure.
Classification/Compensation Methodology/Timeline
The process to be utilized in a comprehensive study of City -Wide
magnitude requires the inclusion of the following elements and
corresponding timelines.
* Developing classification/compensation survey and subsequent
mailing to approximately ten (10) cities. March, 1991
* Developing Job Analysis Questionnaires (JAQ's). March, 1991
* Informing and educating management and employees on the
process and conduct of the classification study. March, 1991
* Initiating the classification study with a job analysis that
includes the dissemination of Job Analysis Questionnaires
(JAQ's). April, 1991
* Analyzing and reviewing JAQ's.
Conducting job audits, interviews and observations.
April, 1991
April, 1991
Developing departmental/class structures, job specifications,
and position descriptions, incorporating employee
recommendations/concerns into interim reports/proposals, as
appropriate. May, 1991
Page Three
Allocating positions to classifications, determining career
ladders and internal/external relationships, as well as the
identifying the FLSA status (exempt/non-exempt). May, 1991
Conducting follow-up interviews to discuss comments and
recommendations with assigned employees for further review.
May, 1991
Submitting final report for approval. June, 1991
Management/Employee Participation
In the past, employees have expressed concern over various
classification and salary issues. In addition, employees have also
expressed a desire to actively participate in this study.
As a result of these factors, we recommend the use of a
Classification/Compensation Advisory Group (CCAG). CCAG would be
composed of several Department Heads and representative(s) from
each recognized bargaining group. The purpose of the group will
be to provide a forum in which the entire question of salaries and
fringe benefits for all employees can be expressed and presented
to the City Manager.
CCAG would help identify and voice concerns over the City's salary
structure, not only the internal relationships, but also the
external comparisons with other public sector agencies. The group
could assist with the development of the salary survey analysis as
well as the actual job analysis to be conducted.
In order to ensure a systematic approach to the
classification/compensation for the City of San Jacinto, the
Personnel Department will utilize the CCAG to assist throughout the
process. Initially, the first task of CCAG will be to develop
a classification/compensation survey utilizing a series of common
or benchmark classes from approximately ten (10) cities. The
second task of CCAG will be to review and provide input on the
existing (draft) job analysis questionnaire developed by staff.
The third task of CCAG will be to assist staff on informing and
educating the employees on the process, scope and purpose of the
classification study. Throughout the study, CCAG will be involved
on a pro -active basis.
Staff has met with the various bargaining groups to inform them of
our intent to conduct a city-wide classification and compensation
study and gain their feedback.
Page Four
Proposed Recommendations to the City Council
Prior to the commencement of the classification and pay study, the
City Council will need to adopt a Reclassification Policy and
Classification/Plan Administration Policy. The Reclassification
Policy is specifically created to define reclassification and
describe its affect on salary levels, anniversary dates and
employee status. The Classification/Plan Administration Policy
provides a framework to update the classification plan and provide
basic guidelines. Both Policies will be needed in order to
effectively implement the results of the upcoming study.
Based on the information provided, staff recommends the City
Council:
(1) Authorize staff to proceed with the classification and
compensation study.
(2) Adopt the Reclassification Plan, dated 2-26-91.
(3) Adopt the Classification/Plan Administration Policy, dated
2-26-91.
Attached to this correspondence is a copy of both proposed policies
for your review and comments.
MEMO
TO: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
FROM: Henry T. Garcia, Assistant City Manager
DATE: February 26, 1991
SUBJ: RECLASSIFICATION POLICY
PURPOSE:
To define reclassification and describe its effect on salary
levels, anniversary dates and employee status.
POLICY:
Reclassification is the reallocation of a position in one class to
a different class as a result of a significant change in the
duties, responsibilities and/or qualification requirements of the
position.
This action will result in:
a change of class title and class specification for a
position by either moving the position to another
existing class in the Classification Plan or to a new
class specifically created for the position.
placement of the position in a salary range with a
maximum salary rate that may be higher, lower or the same
as previously held.
Upward Reclassification - In any case where a position is
reclassified to a class with a salary range having a higher maximum
salary rate, and the incumbent meets the qualification requirement
for the new class, the effect of this action on salary, anniversary
date and status shall be as follows:
Salary - The incumbent will be entitled to the closest step
within the new salary range that would provide a minimum of
a 5% increase.
c:\WP5O\HENRY\RECLASS.PCY
Upward Reclassification (continued)
Page Two
Anniversary Date - The incumbent's anniversary date shall
normally be established as of the effective date of the
reclassification action.
Employee Status - A new probationary period shall be
established as of the effective date of the reclassification
action.
NOTE: When the incumbent of a position that has been
reclassified upward does not meet the qualification
requirements for the new class, the Department Head may:
- Transfer the employee to another position in the previous
class; or
- Place the employee in a training capacity with a
specified time frame to meet the qualification
requirements.
Downward Reclassification - In any case where a position is
reclassified to a class with a salary range having a lower maximum
salary rate, the effect of this action on salary, anniversary date
and status shall be as follows:
Salary - The incumbent will either:
1. Retain current salary if current salary is the same as
a step within the salary range of the new class; or,
2. Be placed on the closest step within the salary range of
the new class that approximates the current salary if the
current salary is between steps within the new salary
range; or
3. Be reduced to the maximum step of the salary range of the
new class if current salary is greater than the maximum
of the new salary range.
c:\WP50\HENRY\RECLASS.PCY
Downward Reclassification - Salary (continued)
Page Three
NOTE: For items 2 and 3 above, a "y" rate may be established
that holds the incumbent at current salary until such time as
a salary rate of the new class is the same as or exceeds the
amount of the "y" rate. Establishment of a "y" rate is an
administrative determination and requires approval of the
Department Head and City Manager.
Anniversary Date and Employee Status - There shall be no
change in the incumbent's anniversary date and status as a
result of downward reclassification.
Lateral Reclassification - In any case where a position is
reclassified to a class with a salary range having the same maximum
salary rate, there shall be no change in the salary, anniversary
date and status of the incumbent.
Merit Increases After Reclassification - If applicable, merit step
advances to the maximum of the salary range for the new class shall
occur according to regular City policy.
Effective Date of a Reclassification - The effective date of a
reclassification action shall normally coincide with the first
working day of the first pay period following the date of City
Council approval.
Grandfathering existing positions: In the case of where an existing
incumbent is determined to not have the existing education and
experience for the job classification, the position/salary shall
remain the same until that particular position becomes vacant. At
the time this position becomes vacant, the new job classification
standards (where applicable) will be implemented.
c:\WP50\HENRY\RECLASS.PCY
MEMO
TO: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
FROM: Henry T. Garcia, Assistant City Manager
DATE: February 26, 1991
SUBJ: CLASSIFICATION PLAN ADMINISTRATION POLICY
PURPOSE:
To update the existing Classification Plan and provide basic
guidelines for Plan administration.
POLICY:
The new Classification Plan will provide for the grouping into
classes of all positions sufficiently alike in duties and
responsibilities to be called by the same descriptive title, to be
assigned the same salary range, to be given the same examination
or other selection device for appointment or promotion, and to
require substantially the same qualifications (in terms of
experience, education, knowledge, abilities and skills) on the part
of applicants or employees.
Plan Maintenance - The Personnel Director shall be responsible for
maintenance of the Classification Plan, including the allocation
of new or changed positions to the appropriate class, the
determination of proper salary ranges within the provision of pay
administration, maintenance of up-to-date class specifications, and
the preparation of reports and recommendations on revisions to the
Classification Plan.
Revisions recommended by the Personnel Director (including
reclassification actions and the creation of new or abolition of
existing classes) which affect individual positions, classes, class
series, or all classes in the Classification Plan require approval
of the City Manager and City Council and become effective upon the
recommended date approved by City Council.
Class Specifications - The Personnel Department with assistance of
staff of City Departments, shall provide and maintain written class
specifications for each class.
c:\WP5O\HENRY\CLASS.PCY
Class Specifications (continued)
Page Two
Content - Class specifications shall include the class title,
a brief statement defining the duties and responsibilities of
the class, distinguishing characteristics of the class that
differentiates it from other classes (if applicable), examples
of duties performed, and qualifications required in terms of
education, experience, knowledge, abilities and skills.
Class Title - Class titles specified in the Classification
Plan shall be the official title to identify positions in each
class and for use on all official records. Official titles
will not indicate gender. Working titles for purposes not
related to personnel administration may be used providing such
titles are not similar to, or may be confused with, any other
standard class title.
Where Roman numerals are attached to a class title, the higher
numbers represent the higher levels and such numbers attached
to titles in one class series have no relation to those same
numbers in titles of another class series.
Oualifications - Experience and education statements in each
class specification establish typical requirements that must
be met by all individuals competing for appointment or
promotion to a position in a class. Alternative combinations
of education, experience or training may be specified or other
combinations may be indicated as desirable in an attempt to
meet the particular needs of a department.
Interpretation - Class specifications shall be considered as
descriptive guidelines and not as inclusive of all duties and
responsibilities to be found in positions allocated to a
particular class. An employee may be required to perfotin
other duties of similar kind and quality but not listed in the
class specification, any duties of lower classes in the same
occupational series, or in similar series which have similar
characteristics.
Allocation of New Positions - No individual may be appointed,
reappointed, reinstated, rehired, transferred, demoted or promoted
except to an established position - one that has been classified,
has a class specification established, a salary range assigned, and
has been authorized by City Council.
c:\WP50\HENRY\CLASS.PCY
Allocation of New Positions (continued)
Page Three
Departments requesting a new position, either in an existing or new
class, shall provide a Personnel Request Form - setting forth the
duties, responsibilities and other essential information, along
with an organization chart clearly identifying the position and its
relation to other positions. The Personnel Department will review
these materials, make such other investigation as necessary, and
recommend to the City Manager, following review with the concerned
department(s), allocation of the position to an appropriate class.
Reallocation of Positions - Classification actions that affect the
original allocation of a position and result in the reallocation
of that position are:
1. Title Change - A technical change to better identify a
position or to reflect current occupational terminology.
This change by itself does not require any change in
qualifications, salary range, or status of the
incumbent(s).
2. Reclassification - A reallocation of a position from one
class to another class as a result of changed duties,
responsibilities and/or qualification (experience,
education) requirements. (See reclassification policy).
3. Salary Range Change - A change affecting all positions
in a class and results from such as an amendment to the
Salary Plan, a need to maintain internal equity among
certain classes, or continuing difficulty in recruiting
and retaining well qualified persons.
Requests for Review - Requests for review of the classification
allocation of a position may be initiated by a department or an
employee.
In either case, the Department Head shall be responsible for the
preliminary evaluation and/or justification of the request for
review and shall forward such request, with comment and
recommendation, to the Personnel Director for consideration.
c:\WP5O\HENRY\CLASS.PCY
Requests for Review (continued)
Page Four
The Personnel Department shall conduct a classification study of
accepted requests for review, utilizing a Position Classification
Questionnaire completed by the incumbent(s) and supervision,
organizational information, and interviews with supervisor(s) and
employee(s) as needed, and advise the Department Head(s) concerned
of the disposition of requests for review.
Bargaining Unit Notification - The appropriate bargaining unit will
be advised of intended actions and will be sent a copy of the
implementing report.
c:\WP5O\HENRY\CLASS.PCY
San Jacinto Fire Department
MEMO
February 28, 1991
TO: City Council via City Manager Pamela S. Easter
FROM: Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief
AGEND
SUBJECT: Council Adoption of an 'AUTOMATIC AID
AGREEMENT' With the County of Riverside Fire
Department
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the City Council approve Resolution No. 1939 which adopts an "Automatic Aid
Agreement" with the Riverside County Fire Department.
BACKGROUND:
Outside aid agreements usually take one of two foetus. The first and most common is a
written agreement among two or more departments to respond to formal requests for
assistance under specified conditions. The second is an automatic aid agreement, which,
as the phrase implies, permits dispatchers to send the nearest available unit
automatically, regardless of jurisdictional boundaries.
No community can bank on being able to handle all emergencies without outside
assistance. It is the community's responsibility to manage that outside assistance and to
be ready to give assistance when called. This is the essence of mutual aid. Mutual aid is
one of the fire service's oldest and finest traditions. The concept began as informal
understandings among fire departments that they would respond to one anothers' calls
for assistance. Later, neighboring departments formalized these agreements in writing.
Thus, for a major fire, personnel and equipment from surrounding areas can be asked
to respond to the affected jurisdiction.
On February 19, 1991 the City Council approved Resolution No. 1933 which adopted a
County -wide mutual aid plan for fire protection. The plan was developed as Annex B
to the Riverside County Multi -Hazard Operations Plan.
In some circumstances, it is desirable to have an "automatic aid" agreement with
surrounding jurisdictions. There is a distinct difference between mutual aid and
automatic aid. Mutual aid is sent only when requested by an agency who needs
additional resources. Automatic aid is normally sent automatically by an agency in
Memo for Resolution No. 1939
Adoption of Automatic Aid Agreement with Riverside County Fire Department
certain prearranged circumstances without a specific request. Both automatic aid and
mutual aid must be reciprocal.
This proposed automatic aid agreement between the City of San Jacinto Fire
Department and Riverside County Fire Department benefits both agencies on calls when
one or the other is unavailable or for fires where assistance is needed immediately.
This is illustrated by the Fire Reflex Times for Emergency Resources from the San
Jacinto Fire Department's Strategic Plan:
Needed
Fire Reflex Times for Emergency Resources
Fire
Flow
GPM
I 10
Minutes
14
Minutes
Off Dutyy/Mutual or Autamalic Aid
20
Minutes
25
Minutes
30
Minutes
Totals
1,000
lEngine(3)
1Squarl(2)
lEngine(3)
1Chief(1)
2 Engines (6)
1 Squad (2)
1 Chief (1)
Cumulativ
5
9
9
Personnel
1 500
to
2,500
lEngine(3)
1Squad(2)
lEngine(3)
1Chief(1)
lEngine(3)
1Truck(3)
lEngine(3)
1Chief(1)
lEngine(3)
1BS(1)
5 Engines (15)
1 Squad(2)
1 Truck (3)
1 BS (1)
2 Chiefs (2)
Cumulative
Personnel
5
9
15
19
23
23
Over
2,500
lEngine(3)
1Squad(2)
lEngine (3)
2Engines(6)
1Truck(3)
lEngine(3)
1Chief(1)
2Engines(6)
1BS(1)
1Truck(3)
7 Engines (21)
1 Squad (2)
2 Trucks (6)
1 BS (1)
2 Chiefs (2)
1Chief (1)
Cumulative
9
18
22
32
32
Personnel
o 5
GPM= Gallons Per Minute BS= Breathing Support Unit
Number of Personnel are in ( )
Fire Department response to structures protected by automatic sprinklers may be altered
as determined by the Firc Chief
Memo for Resolution No, 1939
Adoption of Automatic Aid Agreement with Riverside County Fire Department
As shown in the table, any fire in the City needs as a minimum on a first response 2
engines, 1 squad and 1 chief officer for a total of nine (9) firefighters. As the size of
the structure increases and the larger a fire, this response requirement may reach up to
thirty-two (32) firefighters. The City's current staffing is 1 engine with three
firefighters. Therefore, it is obvious that for a minimum first response to any fire
additional resources are immediately necessary from outside the City. This automatic
aid agreement gives us that capability for approximately two thirds of the City as
indicated on the map. Negotiations are under way with the City of Hemet to cover the
remaining portion of the City.
This proposed automatic aid agreement with Riverside County Fire Department would
accomplish part of Recommendation #29 of the Fire Department's Strategic Plan:
._i.11lelf
tion #29-
It is recommended that the City of San Jacinto sign automatic aid agree-
ments with the Riverside County Fire Department and the City of Hemet
Fire Department for response to certain area and the use of specialized
equipment.
11
ROSS CHADN
Fire Chief
CK
RESOLUTION NO. 1939
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF AN
'AUTOMATIC AID AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO AND THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, WHICH DIRECTLY
INVOLVES THE APPARATUS, EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL
RESOURCES OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO FIRE DEPARTMENT.
WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto, California currently maintains and operates
a fire department within the City's boundaries for the purpose of providing a variety of
protective services to City of San Jacinto responsibility lands; and
WHEREAS, both the County of Riverside and the City of San Jacinto maintain
as part of their municipal service, an organized and equipped Fire Department, charged
with the duty of fire protection and rescue within the protection jurisdictions and that it
has disclosed it would be to the benefit of each party, that the services of each of their
Fire Departments be, in some circumstances, extended outside of their corporate limits
of each party; and
WHEREAS, the parties both desire that in some circumstances the Fire
Department of the City of San Jacinto will respond to fire and emergency
medical/rescue incidents outside of the corporate limits of the City of San Jacinto, and
that in some circumstances the Riverside County Fire Department will respond to fire
and emergency medical/rescue incidents within the corporate limits of the City of San
Jacinto; and
WHEREAS, it is operationally more effective for the response of such fire
service inter -agency automatic assistance to be preplanned before incidents occur, and
not during such incidents.
NOW, THE FORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO that it does hereby approve the adoption of the
provisions of the "AUTOMATIC AID AGREEMENT" between the City of San Jacinto
and the County of Riverside which is part of this Resolution along with the Agreement's
1V1.111-1.
'Automatic. Aid Agreement" with Riverside County Fire Department Resolution No. 1939
Exhibit A (geographical areas of coverage) and Exhibit B (appropriate equipment and
dispatch procedures).
MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 1991.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
Mayor
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. 1939 duly adopted by the
said City Council of the said City of San Jacinto on the date therein set forth.
City Clerk
AUTOMATIC AID AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
1991, by and between the
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
AND
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, both the County of Riverside and the City of San
Jacinto maintain as part of their municipal service, an organized
and equipped Fire Department, charged with the duty of fire
protection and rescue within the protection jurisdictions and
that it has disclosed it would be to the benefit of each party,
that the services of each of their Fire Department's be, in some
circumstances, extended outside of their corporate limits of each
party, and
WHEREAS, the parties both desire that in some circumstances
the fire department of the City of San Jacinto will respond to
fire and emergency medical/rescue incidents outside of the corpo-
rate limits of the City of San Jacinto, and that in some circum-
stances the Riverside County Fire Department will respond to fire
and emergency medical/rescue incidents within the corporate
limits of the City of San Jacinto.
NOW, THEREFORE, AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES,
COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, THE PARTIES
HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. That, Pursuant to the authority granted by Section 55632
of the Government Code, California Disaster and Civil Defense
Master Mutual Aid Agreement, the parties hereto agree to respond
to emergency alarms outside of its corporate geographical limita-
tions, and into the corporate geographical limitations of the
other in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter set
forth. The respective territories covered by this agreement are
set forth in a map attached hereto marked Exhibit "A".
2. That the specific details of the services to be provided
under this agreement shall be determined by the respective Fire
Chiefs of both San Jacinto City and the Riverside County Fire De-
partment. It is understood that all plans which deal with emer-
gency response shall adhere as closely as practical to the
"nearest unit auto -aid" concept which forms the basis for this
agreement.
3. That each of the parties will dispatch the appropriate
equipment (See exhibit B) to the geographical area (s) noted in
Exhibit A, dependent on availability, and fire conditions.
4. That Each party hereto shall maintain Workmen's Compen-
sation Insurance covering its own employees without cost to the
other agency, and each agency shall pay its own personnel without
cost to the other agency.
5. That each of the parties hereto shall be fully responsi-
ble for all repair, maintenance and upkeep, including gas, oil,
lubrication, parts, replacement and repair of casualty damage, of
all of its own equipment used pursuant to this agreement while
said equipment is used outside of its geographical limitations.
6. That the extra -territorial services to be rendered
pursuant to this agreement shall consist of providing First Alarm
fire extinguishing and rescue services, and each agency agrees to
also provide, where possible, all of its own additional equipment
necessary in the event of a Second or Third Alarm involvement
within its own geographical limits.
7. That both agencies may provide to each other, upon
request, any special emergency or fire equipment, needed to meet
unusual emergency needs, provided said special equipment is
available. This includes equipment for station coverage upon
request.
8. That each party be responsible to provide the law en-
forcement and traffic control personnel within its own geographi-
cal boundaries.
9. That the Fire Chiefs of each agency hereto shall have
joint authority and responsibility for the administration of this
agreement which they may delegate to their agents or employees in
their respective Fire Departments.
la. That when and where the Fire Department of either party
hereto responds outside of its geographical boundaries, the
receiving agency shall provide (if possible) an officer of its
Fire Department, who will be in charge and who will direct activ-
ities and assume the responsibility for releasing any Fire Engine
Company from the scene.
11. That no payments of any kind shall be made between the
parties hereto as compensation for any services performed pursu-
ant to this agreement. Aircraft and handcrews excluded.
12. Whereas Exhibit "A" shows two designated areas desig-
nated by two different colors. The area outlined in Yellow is
the City of San Jacinto boundaries. The area outlined in Orange
is the area that the City of San Jacinto will automatically
respond to with appropriate apparatus upon receipt of a fire
within the outlined County Area. The area outlined in Green is
the City of San Jacinto area into which the County Fire Depart-
ment agrees to respond with appropriate apparatus upon receipt of
a fire within the City area.
13. That each agency may upon its own initiative go upon
land which is the responsibility of the other agency to engage in
fire suppression work; provided however, its forces shall not
knowingly perform any act of a nature which will reflect to the
discredit or which is contrary of the established policy of the
responsible agency.
14. That if a fire occurs along the border line of the area
of protection responsibility, it is agreed that under no circum-
stances should there be any delay in attack pending determination
of the precise location of the fire. It shall be agreed policy
that both agencies shall send forces promptly to start suppres-
sion action on borderline fires.
15. That each of the parties hereto shall be fully respon-
sible for the preservation of evidence.
16. Each party hereto shall defend, indemnify, and hold
harmless the other party and their respective agents, servants
and employees, of and from any and all liabilities, claims,
demands, debts, suits, actions and causes, arising out of or in
any manner connected with, any act or omission of such indemnify-
ing party hereunder, or its agents, servants, employees, done or
performed pursuant to the terms and conditions of this agreement.
17. That this agreement shall be effective as of the day
and year hereinabove written and continue until terminated by
either party giving the other party 30 days notice in writing.
Notice shall be given to the City of San Jacinto at 210 E. Main
Street, San Jacinto, Ca 92383, or Riverside County Fire Depart-
ment at 210 W. San Jacinto Ave, Perris, Ca 92370.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
Chairperson,
Board of Supervisors
for Riverside County
Francis Boykin
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Gerald Blankenship Jim Cox
Deputy County Counsel City Attorney
ATY°EST : A11EST :
Gerald Maloney Maurice Armster
Clerk of the Board City Clerk
MUTUAL AID
BETWEEN
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
DISPATCH PROCEDURES
Dispatch procedures into the Orange area (San Jacinto City) are
as follows:
The City of San Jacinto agrees to provide, if available, the
following resources to those areas shaded in Orange (Riverside
County Area).
Medical Aid - One Squad or one Engine (on request only)
Structure Fire - One Engine (automatic response upon
notification)
Vegetation Fire - One Engine Company (automatic res-
ponse upon notification)
Other Fire - One Engine Company (automatic response
upon notification)
Riverside County Fire Department agrees to provide, the
following resources to those areas shaded in Green (San Jacinto
City).
Medical Aid - One Squad or one Engine (on request only)
Structure Fire - One Engine (automatic response upon
notification)
Vegetation Fire - One Engine (automatic response upon
notification)
Other Fire - One Engine (on request only)
Upon receipt of an alarm involving these areas the Depart-
ment receiving the alarm will immediately notify the cooperating
department. Close communication will be necessary to prevent
response duplications.
Mutual aid on structure and vegetation fires will be the
closest available engines regardless of type.
Riverside County Fire Department, and the San Jacinto City Fire
Department will provide, if available, reciprocal station cover-
age upon request from either agency.
EXHIBIT E
an1&O a r
AUTOMATIC AID AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
1991, by and between the
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
AND
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, both the County of Riverside and the City of San
Jacinto maintain as part of their municipal service, an organized
and equipped Fire Department, charged with the duty of fire
protection and rescue within the protection jurisdictions and
that it has disclosed it would be to the benefit of each party,.
that the services of each of their Fire Department's be, in some
circumstances, extended outside of their corporate limits of each
party, and
WHEREAS, the parties both desire that in some circumstances
the fire department of the City of San Jacinto will respond to
fire and emergency medical/rescue incidents outside of the corpo-
rate limits of the City of San Jacinto, and that in some circum-
stances the Riverside County Fire Department will respond to fire
and emergency medical/rescue incidents within the corporate
limits of the City of San Jacinto.
NOW, THEREFORE, AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL PROMISES,
COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, THE PARTIES
HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. That, Pursuant to the authority granted by Section 55632
of the Government Code, California Disaster and Civil Defense
Master Mutual Aid Agreement, the parties hereto agree to respond
to emergency alarms outside of its corporate geographical limita-
tions, and into the corporate geographical limitations of the
other in accordance with the teLIus and conditions hereinafter set
forth. The respective territories covered by this agreement are
set forth in a map attached hereto marked Exhibit "A".
2. That the specific details of the services to be provided
under this agreement shall be determined by the respective Fire
Chiefs of both San Jacinto City and the Riverside County Fire De-
partment. It is understood that all plans which deal with emer-
gency response shall adhere as closely as practical to the
"nearest unit auto -aid" concept which forms the basis for this
agreement.
3. That each of the parties will dispatch the appropriate
equipment (See exhibit B) to the geographical area (s) noted in
Exhibit A, dependent on aail -bi J. i:'v , and ;.._ condition
4. That Each party hereto shall maintain Workmen's Compen-
sation Insurance covering its own employees without cost to the
other agency, and each agency shall pay its own personnel without
cost to the other agency.
5. That each of the parties hereto shall be fully responsi-
ble for all repair, maintenance and upkeep, including gas, oil,
lubrication, parts, replacement and repair of casualty damage, of
all of its own equipment used pursuant to this agreement while
said equipment is used outside of its geographical limitations.
6. That the extra -territorial services to be rendered
pursuant to this agreement shall consist of providing First Alarm
fire extinguishing and rescue services, and each agency agrees to
also provide, where possible, all of its own additional equipment
necessary in the event of a Second or Third Alarm involvement
within its own geographical limits.
7. That both agencies may provide to each other, upon
request, any special emergency or fire equipment, needed to meet
unusual emergency needs, provided said special equipment is
available. This includes equipment for station coverage upon
request.
8. That each party be responsible to provide the law en-
forcement and traffic control personnel within its own geographi-
cal boundaries.
9. That the Fire Chiefs of each agency hereto shall have
joint authority and responsibility for the administration of this
agreement which they may delegate to their agents or employees in
their respective Fire Departments.
10. That when and where the Fire Department of either party
hereto responds outside of its geographical boundaries, the
receiving agency shall provide (if possible) an officer of its
Fire Department, who will be in charge and who will direct activ-
ities and assume the responsibility for releasing any Fire Engine
Company from the scene.
11. That no payments of any kind shall be made between the
parties hereto as compensation for any services performed pursu-
ant to this agreement. Aircraft and handcrews excluded.
12. Whereas Exhibit "A" shows two designated areas desig-
nated by two different colors. The area outlined in Yellow is
the City of San Jacinto boundaries. The area outlined in Orange
is the area that the City of San Jacinto will automatically
respond to with appropriate apparatus upon receipt of a fire
within the outlined County Area. The area outlined in Green is
the City of San Jacinto area into which the County Fire Depart-
ment agrees to respond with appropriate apparatus upon receipt of
a fire within the City area.
13. That each agency may upon its own initiative go upon
land which is the responsibility of the other agency to engage in
fire suppression work; provided however, its forces shall not
knowingly perform any act of a nature which will reflect to the
discredit or which is contrary ot the established policy of the
responsible agency.
14. That if a fire occurs along the border line of the area
of protection responsibility, it is agreed that under no circum-
stances should there be any delay in attack pending determination
of the precise location of the fire. It shall be agreed policy
that both agencies shall send forces promptly to start suppres-
sion action on borderline fires.
15. That each of the parties hereto shall be fully respon-
sible for the preservation of evidence.
16. Each party hereto shall defend, indemnify, and hold
harmless the other party and their respective agents, servants
and employees, of and from any and all liabilities, claims,
demands, debts, suits, actions and causes, arising out of or in
any manner connected with, any act or omission of such indemnify-
ing party hereunder, or its agents, servants, employees, done or
performed pursuant to the terms and conditions of this agreement.
17. That this agreement shall be effective as of the day
and year hereinabove written and continue until terminated by
either party giving the other party 30 days notice in writing.
Notice shall be given to the City of San Jacinto at 210 E. Main
Street, San Jacinto, Ca 92383, or Riverside County Fire Depart-
ment at 210 W. San Jacinto Ave, Perris, Ca 92370.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
Chairperson,
Board of Supervisors
for Riverside County
Francis Boykin
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Gerald Blankenship Jim Cox
Deputy County Counsel City Attorney
ATTEST: ATTEST:
Gerald. Maioney Maurice Arnstior
City CIerR
MUTUAL AID
BETWEEN
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
DISPATCH PROCEDURES
Dispatch procedures into the Orange area (San Jacinto City) are
as follows:
The City of San Jacinto agrees to provide, if available, the
following resources to those areas shaded in Orange (Riverside
County Area).
Medical Aid - One Squad or one Engine (on request only)
Structure Fire - One Engine (automatic response upon
notification)
Vegetation Fire - One Engine Company (automatic res-
ponse upon notification)
Other Fire - One Engine Company (automatic response
upon notification)
Riverside County Fire Department agrees to provide, the
following resources to those areas shaded in Green (San Jacinto
City).
Medical Aid - One Squad or one Engine (on request only)
Structure Fire - One Engine (automatic response upon
notification)
Vegetation Fire - One Engine (automatic response upon
notification)
Other Fire - One Engine (on request only)
Upon receipt of an alarm involving these areas the Depart-
ment receiving the alarm will immediately notify the cooperating
department. Close communication will be necessary to prevent
response duplications.
Mutual aid on structure and vegetation fires will be the
closest available engines regardless of type.
Riverside County Fire Department, and the San Jacinto City Fire
Department will provide, if available, reciprocal station cover-
age upon request from either agency.
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
DESCRIPTION
PLANNING COMMISSION
TRANSMITTAL TO CITY COUNCIL
March 5, 1991
General Plan Amendment 1-91
NORTH MOUNTAIN PARTNERS
c/o The Torrey Group
4631 Viewridge Avenue, S'1'E 200
San Diego, CA 92123
(619) 576-9494
tNDLA
A proposal to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Hillside Area
to Specific Plan Area on the subject property located in the San Jacinto Mountains
north of Soboba Road occupying Sections 13 and 14 and portions of Sections 16 and
23.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL:
The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve General Plan
Amendment 1-91 as shown on Exhibit "I", subject to the Findings of Fact, grant a
Negative Declaration and instruct staff to include this in a General Plan Amendment
Resolution for the first cycle of the 1991 calendar year.
STAFF COMMENTS:
None
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
STAFF REPORT
Chairman Ver Plank and Members of the Planning Commission
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
February 27, 1991
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1-91
APPLICANT: NORTH MOUNTAIN
c/o The Torrey
4631 Viewridge
San Diego, CA
(619) 576-9494
PARTNERS
Group
Avenue, STE 200
92123
ENGINEER: HCH PARTNERS
4877 Viewridge Avenue
San Diego, CA 92123-1667
(619) 278-5750
DESCRIPTION
A proposal for to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan
from Hillside Area to Specific Plan Area on the subject property
located in the San Jacinto Mountains north of Soboba Road occupying
Sections 13 and 14 and portions of Sections 16 and 23.
EXHIBIT "A"
EXHIBIT "B"
EXHIBIT "C"
EXHIBIT "D"
EXHIBIT "E"
EXHIBIT "F"
EXHIBIT "G"
EXHIBIT "H"
EXHIBIT "I"
EXHIBIT "J"
PLANNING COMMISSION
VICINITY MAP
PROPOSED ANNEXATION AREA
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN
EXISTING ZONING
EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT
EXISTING USES
FLOOD ZONE
SEISMIC ZONE
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
PROPOSED ZONING
JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 1
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The subject property is located within a known "A" flood zone,
however only a small portion of the property is within the "A"
flood zone. Areas affected by the flood zone must mitigate the
adverse impacts and comply with the City's Flood Damage Prevention
Ordinance.
The property is within the historic range of the Stephen's Kangaroo
Rat. The site mainly consists of hillside areas with no uses at
the present time. A sand and gravel operation currently operates
on the southern portion of the subject property.
The subject property is located within a known seismic zone. The
special study zone runs parallel with and adjacent to the southern
portion of the subject property.
There are presently no utilities serving the subject property.
Utilities may be made available, however, extensions will be
required to service the subject development.
This General Plan Amendment on its own does not require an
environmental impact report, however the General Plan Amendement
in association with the concurrent Change of Zone and related
Specific Plan may impact the environment. The applicant is
required to provide an Environmental Impact Report for the related
Specific Plan.
The proposed General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone create the
potential for environmental impacts. Some of the environmental
concerns made possible through the amended General Plan and Zoning
are as follows:
[1] Public safety structures and equipment
[2] Public safety staffing
[3] Noise
[4] Regional transportation construction and maintenance
[5] School Impact
[6] Need for youth centers, senior centers, and other
public facilities.
The proposed General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone will allow
for development to occur, which naturally creates the need to
expand public safety services. The type of development will
determine the impact on public services. Typically, police service
is impacted to a greater extent than fire services. In this case,
however they may be equally impacted due to the proximity and
accessibility of the subject property.
The increase in units from development will create more potential
for fire calls but usually does not necessitate the need for
increased personnel. A larger measure of impact on fire service
PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 2
is response time. Impacts of development on the Fire Department
are identified by Ordinance 918. The impacts of new development
are partially mitigated by the payment of fees.
The ultimate goal of the San Jacinto Fire Department is to be able
to respond to all calls within 5 minutes. The subject property is
beyond the 5 minute response time and creates a fire protection
circumstance which has not been seen before in San Jacinto.
The increase in density from development will increase and may
significantly increase noise levels in the vicinity where there are
currently no environmental noise concerns.
All development that induces motor vehicle usage has a negative
impact on the environment. A single project usually creates few
problems. The cummulative impacts of all development within a
region all influence the air quality. The main polluter is the
motor vehicle idling in traffic.
There are two regional roads that pass through San Jacinto, Ramona
Expressway and Sanderson Avenue. They are regional because they
are used to transport people efficiently around the cities to
destinations outside the valley. Development associated with the
subject property must participate in the development of the
regional circulation system.
The proposed General Plan Amendment is the first necessary step to
allow for residential and commercial development on the subject
property. Schools are impacted by residential development. State
law has set the maximum that can be charged for school impact
mitigation for both residential and non-residential uses. Unless
State law changes, the impact of development on schools is
generally considered as mitigated. However, the State lags behind
development in providing funds for school development. The City
may require the developer to participate in a financing district
to pay for schools.
The development made possible by the General Plan Amendment and
Change of Zone will increase the demand for public facilities such
as libraries, youth centers, senior centers, etc. As development
occurs on the subject property, the City may require participation
in public facility financing.
Prior to development of the subject property, an Environmental
Impact Report will be required to address the above environmental
concerns.
The impact of the proposed General Plan Amendment on public safety
structures and equipment should not be significant. The combined
impacts of Annexation, General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone and
Specific Plan with the associated development will significantly
impact the public safety structures and equipment of the City of
PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 3
San Jacinto. These impacts will also be address in the
Environmental Impact Report required for the Specific Plan.
DISCUSSION
The General Plan currently designates the subject property and
adjacent areas as Hillside Area.
Current zoning on a portion of the subject property is W-2,
Controlled Development. The remainder of the property is within
the County and is zoned W-2-160, Controlled Development (minimum
160 acre parcels).
The proposed pre -annexation zoning is W-2, Controlled Development.
The City of San Jacinto W-2, Controlled Development zone allows for
uses permitted in the R-1 and R-A-1-20 zones. Other allowable uses
consist of libraries, museums, golf and tennis clubs, meat cutting
and packaging, etc. Conditional uses consist of Airports,
cemetary, drive-in theaters, mobile home parks, etc.
County W-2-160 allows County A-1 uses of light agricultural on the
minimum 160 acre parcels. A-1 uses include a single family
dwelling units on the minimum required parcel. Other allowable
uses in the W-2-160 zone might be farms, waterworks, nurseries,
etc. on a minimum parcel of 160 acres.
Since the City of San Jacinto W-2, Controlled Development zone is
less restrictive allowing higher densities and more uses there is
more potential for an environmental impact. These potential
environmental impacts will be addressed and mitigated within -the
Environmental Impact Report for the Specific Plan.
Existing and adjacent uses consist of hillside areas. A sand and
gravel operation is located on the southern section of the subject
property.
Access to the site is available from Soboba Road. Alternatives for
access to the site other than Soboba Road are being explored by the
applicant.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 91-
13 recommending the City Council approve General Plan Amendment 1-
91 as shown on Exhibit "I", subject to the Findings of Fact and
grant a Negative Declaration.
Brian McNabb
Director of Community Development
PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 4
FINDINGS OF FACT GPA 1-91
1. There are no utilities to serve the subject property at the
present time, however, extensions will be required to service
the site.
2. GPA 1-91 is located within a known seismic zone.
3. GPA 1-91 is located within a known "A" Flood Zone.
4. The subject site is within the habitat range of the Stephen's
Kangaroo Rat.
5. The General Plan shows the subject property within Hillside
Area Boundaries. The existing zoning is W-2, Controlled
Development on property within the City. Proposed pre -
annexation zoning for the proposed annexation area is W-2,
Controlled Development.
6. Access to the site is available from Soboba Road and future
access routes are being explored.
7. The proposed General Plan Amendment is the first necessary
entitlement to allow for ultimate residential and commercial
development on the subject property.
8. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone create
the potential for the following environmental impacts:
[1] Public safety structures and equipment
[2] Public safety staffing
[3] Noise
[4] Regional transportation construction and maintenance
[5] School Impact
[6] Need for youth centers, senior centers, and other
public facilities.
PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 5
3200
3
10,580' 'II-
1
(\._
\� '''N '' ‘7II,,, _,':: \ \\ A c i r, 7 B
2,700 '--7A---SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
'-.-------/cL)
'-'-)\'-\\. -,--;":21\\\
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA--Aipl.:---/ c---
J
,, „ irL.:
Y
C,Ity O,f S�_ri,)aitlt
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
,./aPS,V..O
YINg
7'77
\3
J
EXHIBIT "f "
PROPOSED GENERAL
GPA 1.91
LAN
NORTH MQUNTAIN
2 RESOLUTION NO. 1942
3
4 `A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
5 OF SAN JACINTO, APPROVING AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE
6 ELEMENT OF THE SAN JACINTO GENERAL PLAN FOR THE FIRST
7 CYCLE OF 1991
8
9 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
10 ' FOLLOWS;
11
12 WHEREAS, Section 65631 of the Government Code provides that
13 no mandatory element of a General Plan shall be amended more
14 frequently than four time during any calendar year, and that the City
15 Council of the City of San Jacinto is amending the Land Use Element
16 of the San Jacinto General Plan for the first time during the 1991
17 calendar year; and
18
19 WHEREAS, the City Council of San Jacinto held a public
20 hearing on March 5, 1991 and made a determination that the Land Use
21 Element of the San Jacinto General Plan should be amended as follows:
22
23 A. Existing land use patterns will be enhanced by GPA 1-
24 91 and being assigned specific plan controlled
25 development land use; as designated on Exhibit "A".
26
27 B. GPA 1-91 will enhance the logical development of the
28 City.
29
30 C. GPA 1-91 allow reasonable and proper use of property
31 in the vicinity of the amendment.
32
33
34 WHEREAS, advertisement for a public hearing on GPA 1-91 was
35 published in accordance with Article 6, Chapter 3, Title 7, of the
36 Government Code; and
37
38 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there will not be a
39 significant impact upon the environment by right of this change and
40 adopts a Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment 1-91
41
42 Therefore the land use element of the General Plan is
43 amended in accordance with Exhibit "A".
44
45
46 INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the said City Council
47 of the 5th day of March, 1991.
48
49
50 MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED the 5th day of March, 1991.
51
52 ATTEST:
53.
54
55
56 Deputy City Clerk Mayor
57
58 CERTIFICATE
59
50 The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution
51 No. 1942 duly passed by the said City Council of the City of San
52 Jacinto on the date set forth therein.
53
54
55
56 Deputy City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DA I L:
SUBJECT:
APPLICANT:
DESCRIPTION
PLANNING COMMISSION
TRANSMITTAL TO CITY COUNCIL
March 5, 1991
Change of Zone 2-91
NORTH MOUNTAIN PARTNERS
c/o The Torrey Group
4631 Viewridge Avenue, STE 200
San Diego, CA 92123
(619) 576-9494
A proposal for a pre -annexation zone change to W-2, Controlled Development on the
subject property located in the San Jacinto Mountains north of Soboba Road
occupying Sections 13 and 14 and portions of Sections 16 and 23.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL:
The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt Ordinance 930
approving Change of Zone 2-91 as shown on Exhibit "A" of Ordinance 930, subject to
the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration.
STAFF COMMENTS:
None
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
STAFF REPORT
Chairman Ver Plank and Members of the Planning Commission
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
February 25, 1991
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
CHANGE OF ZONE 2-91
APPLICANT:
ENGINEER:
DESCRIPTION
NORTH MOUNTAIN
c/o The Torrey
4631 Viewridge
San Diego, CA
(619) 576-9494
HCH PARTNERS
4877 Viewridge
San Diego, CA
(619) 278-5750
PARTNERS
Group
Avenue, STE 200
92123
Avenue
92123-1667
A proposal for a pre -annexation zone change to W-2, Controlled
Development on the subject property located in the San Jacinto
Mountains north of Soboba Road occupying Sections 13 and 14 and
portions of Sections 16 and 23.
EXHIBIT "A"
EXHIBIT "B"
EXHIBIT "C"
EXHIBIT "D"
EXHIBIT "E"
EXHIBIT "F"
EXHIBIT "G"
EXHIBIT "H"
EXHIBIT "I"
EXHIBIT "J"
PLANNING COMMISSION
VICINITY MAP
PROPOSED ANNEXATION AREA
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN
EXISTING ZONING
EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT
EXISTING USES
FLOOD ZONE
SEISMIC ZONE
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
PROPOSED ZONING
JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The subject property is located within a known "A" flood zone,
however only a small portion of the property is within the "A"
flood zone. Areas affected by the flood zone must mitigate the
adverse impacts and comply with the City's Flood Damage Prevention
Ordinance.
The property is within the historic range of the Stephen's Kangaroo
Rat. The site mainly consists of hillside areas with no uses at
the present time. A sand and gravel operation currently operates
on the southern portion of the subject property.
The subject property is located within a known seismic zone. The
special study zone runs parallel with and adjacent to the southern
portion of the subject property.
There are presently no utilities serving the subject property.
Utilities may be made available, however, extensions will be
required to service the subject development.
This Change of Zone on its own does not require an environmental
impact report, however the General Plan Amendement in association
with the concurrent Change of Zone and related Specific Plan may
impact the environment. The applicant is required to provide an
Environmental Impact Report for the related Specific Plan.
The proposed General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone create the
potential for environmental impacts. Some of the environmental
concerns made possible through the amended General Plan and Zoning
are as follows:
[1] Public safety structures and equipment
[2] Public safety staffing
[3] Noise
[4] Regional transportation construction and maintenance
[5] School Impact
[6] Need for youth centers, senior centers, and other
public facilities.
The proposed General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone will allow
for development to occur, which naturally creates the need to
expand public safety services. The type of development will
determine the impact on public services. Typically, police service
is impacted to a greater extent than fire services. In this case,
however they may be equally impacted due to the proximity and
accessibility of the subject property.
The increase in units from development will create more potential
for fire calls but usually does not necessitate the need for
increased personnel. A larger measure of impact on fire service
is response time. Impact of the Fire Department are identified by
PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 2
Ordinance 918. The impacts of new development are partially
mitigated by the payment of fees.
The ultimate goal of the San Jacinto Fire Department is to be able
to respond to all calls within 5 minutes. The subject property is
beyond the 5 minute response time and creates a fire protection
circumstance which has not been seen before in San Jacinto.
The increase in density from development will increase and may
significantly increase noise levels in the vicinity where there are
currently no environmental noise concerns.
All development that induces motor vehicle usage has a negative
impact on the environment. A single project usually creates few
problems. The cummulative impacts of all development within a
region all influence the air quality. The main polluter is the
motor vehicle idling in traffic.
There are two regional roads that pass through San Jacinto, Ramona
Expressway and Sanderson Avenue. They are regional because they
are used to transport people efficiently around the cities to
destinations outside the valley. Development associated with the
subject property must participate in the development of the
regional circulation system.
The proposed change of zone is a necessary step to allow for
residential and commercial development on the subject property.
Schools are impacted by residential development. State law has set
the maximum that can be charged for school impact mitigation for
both residential and non-residential uses. Unless State law
changes, the impact of development on schools is generally
considered as mitigated. However, the State lags behind
development in providing funds for school development. The City
may require the developer to participate in a financing district
to pay for schools.
The development made possible by the General Plan Amendment and
Change of Zone will increase the demand for public facilities such
as libraries, youth centers, senior centers, etc. As development
occurs on the subject property, the City may require participation
in public facility financing.
Prior to development of the subject property, an Environmental
Impact Report will be required to address the above environmental
concerns.
The impact of the proposed General Plan Amendment on public safety
structures and equipment should not be significant. The combined
impacts of Annexation, General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone and
Specific Plan with the associated development will significantly
impact the public safety structures and equipment of the City of
San Jacinto. These impacts will be address in the Environmental
PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 3
Impact Report required for the Specific Plan.
DISCUSSION
The General Plan currently designates the subject property and
adjacent areas as Hillside Area.
Current zoning is on a portion of the subject property is W-2,
Controlled Development. The remainder of the property is within
the County and is zoned W-2-160, Controlled Development (minimum
160 acre parcels).
The proposed pre -annexation zoning is W-2, Controlled Development.
The City of San Jacinto W-2, Controlled Development zone allows for
uses permitted in the R-1 and R-A-1-20 zones. Other allowable uses
consist of libraries, museums, golf and tennis clubs, meat cutting
and packaging, etc. Conditional uses consist of Airports,
cemetary, drive-in theaters, mobile home parks, etc.
County W-2-160 allows County A-1 uses of light agricultural on the
minimum 160 acre parcels. A-1 uses include a single family
dwelling units on the minimum required parcel. Other allowable
uses in the W-2-160 zone might be farms, waterworks, nurseries,
etc. on a minimum parcel of 160 acres.
Since the City of San Jacinto W-2, Controlled Development zone is
less restrictive allowing higher densities and more uses there is
more potential for an environmental impact. These potential
environmental impacts will be addressed and mitigated within the
Environmental Impact Report for the Specific Plan.
Existing and adjacent uses consist of hillside areas. A sand and
gravel operation is located on the southern section of the subject
property.
Access to the site is available from Soboba Road. Alternatives for
access to the site other than Soboba Road are being explored by the
applicant.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 91-
14 recommending the City Council approve Change of Zone 2-91 as
shown on Exhibit "J", subject to the Findings of Fact and grant a
Negative Declaration.
Brian McNabb
Director of Community Development
PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 4
FINDINGS OF FACT CZ 2-91
1. There are no utilities to serve the subject property at the
present time, however, extensions will be required to service
the site.
2. CZ 2-91 is located within a known seismic zone.
3. CZ 2-91 is located within a known "A" Flood Zone.
4. The subject site is within the habitat range of the Stephen's
Kangaroo Rat.
5. The General Plan shows the subject property within Hillside
Area Boundaries. The existing zoning is W-2, Controlled
Development on property within the City. Proposed pre -
annexation zoning for the proposed annexation area is W-2,
Controlled Development.
6. Access to the site is available from Soboba Road and future
access routes are being explored.
7. The proposed change of zone is a necessary entitlement to
allow for ultimate residential and commercial development on
the subject property.
8. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone create
the potential for the following environmental impacts:
[1] Public safety structures and equipment
[2] Public safety staffing
[3] Noise
[4] Regional transportation construction and maintenance
[5] School Impact
[6] Need for youth centers, senior centers, and other
public facilities.
PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 16, 1991 PAGE NO. 5
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
ORDINANCE NO. 930
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF 8AN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA
APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 2-91 AMENDING
ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN A8 FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That ordinance No. 340 is hereby
amended by adding thereto Change of Zone 2-91 as herein set
forth.
section 2. That the zoning of the property in the
City of San Jacinto shown on the attached map marked Exhibit
"A" made a part hereof, is hereby established as W-2,
Controlled Development.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published
in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in
the County of Riverside, State of California.
Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council
on the 5th day of March 1991.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
the City Council on the day of 1991 by
the following vote.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
CITY OF BAN JACINTO,
hereby
that of ordinance No. 930eduly Yh
adoptedbye fthegCity Council oing is a uofcthe
City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the
day of 1991.
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San
Jacinto this day of
1991.
City Clerk
-1-
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: March 1, 1991
SUBJ: Resolution 1941 - Resolution of Interest in the North
Mountain Project
On the Agenda of March 5, 1991, is Resolution No. 1941, expressing
the City Council's interest into further processing of the North
Mountain Specific Plan.
The project has been submitted and the Environmental Impact Report
process has begun. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change also
on the agenda will allow the Annexation to be filed. The
annexation process and project approval process are planned to run
concurrently, with potential approval dates in early 1992.
At this time, the property owner, Roger Morgan, is asking for some
sort of conceptual endorsement of his project by the Council. He
is hoping such an endorsement will show his financial backer
sufficiently the City is truly interested in seeing the project
proceed. Morgan realizes the project is complex and perhaps
controversial and agrees it must be subject to the scrutiny of the
EIR and public hearings. If the City is not interested, then its
time to stop spending money on the project.
Staff and the City Attorney reviewed three different types of
endorsement options; a development agreement, a memorandum of
understanding, and a resolution of interest.
A development agreement should be processed, but cannot be until
a development is approved.
A memorandum of understanding appeared to be a viable option and
a draft was prepared and reviewed with the annexation subcommittee
of Councilmen Rose and Ford. However, the City Attorney advised
this memorandum was also premature because the project needs to be
farther along than it is. Otherwise it might imply an approval
that wasn't actually given. Instead he suggested the non -binding
Resolution of Interest.
Staff has drafted this resolution for Council consideration. It
addresses most of the subjects Morgan wanted covered such as
mentioning the road from Soboba to the mountain top and public
finance support.
In addition to Resolution No. 1941, Staff is also transmitting for
your reference, the draft Memorandum of Understanding so you can
see the areas Morgan wanted addressed.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:lr
-1 3.0 FR f11
TO 1 14 5=
F. G'_'
1MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (DRAFT )
SOBOBA SUMMIT PROJECT
This memorandum of understanding is made and entered into
this day of , 1991, by and between
the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, a- municipal corporation (the "City"),
✓NORTH MOUNTAIN PARTNER$ --a California general partnership (the
"Developer") and -TTHE SAN JACINTO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a
California. Limited Partnership (the "co -developer"), represented
by INTERMAC, INC., General Partner.
The developer is owner of approximately 1250 acres located
in an unincorporated portion of the County of Riverside on the
outskirts of the City (the "Developer's Property), a description
of which is attached hereto.
The co -developer is owner of approximately 200 acres located
in the City (the "Co -Developer's property), a description of
which is also attached hereto.
The Parties acknowledge the Developer's and Co -.Developer's
desire to merge their properties into one development and to
annex the Developer's property into the City with the intent of
creating a world class destination resort/residential community
hereinafter known as SOBOBA SUMMIT.
Given the substantial commitment in time and money made by
the Developer and Co -Developer, and the difficulties of
development per se in these difficult financial times, the
Developer and Co -Developer would like the City to demonstrate
it's commitment to the project through establishment of the
following points which comprise this Memorandum of Understanding:
1) Beneficial Development. The City acknowledges that the
successful development of the project site will be beneficial to
the City and surrounding community, in the following ways:
A) The uniqueness of a European clustered community,
with Spanish Mediterranean architecture, located some
2,000 feet above all that surrounds it, should gain
notoriety for the project and the City locally, nationally
and internationally.
B) Integration of commercial activities with the
residential community will make this a pedestrian
0 2••••• 1 9 13:L31
. . . . •
fC'M IIT
T
F.
community in the true sense, and allow one to live
without an automobile. Alternate means of accessing
the site, such as shuttle busses and the aerial
tram, will eliminate pollution normally associated
with automobiles and preserve the pristine nature of the
site for the enjoyment of residents and visitors,
C) The hotel with state of the art facilities,
three golf courses, world class paragliding
and hang gliding, biking, hiking and trail riding
should be very successful for business conferences,
incentive awards, groups and travelers in general.
The occupancy tax alone could generate $750,000
to $1,000,000 a year for the City, aside from
bringing new people constantly to the community
which would have a favorable affect on other
businesses.
A) The property would have a new tax basis
of approximately $150,000,000, and the city
would get it's proportionate share of the taxes.
E) The commercial center should generate sales
tax revenues bases on $5 to $10 million annually.
The Cities share of that would be 950,000 to
$100,000.
F) The project would create substantial opportunities
for employment throughout the construction phase.
Once fully built out, it would create approximately
1000 new jobs.
G) The amenities offered, and the image created,
would have a favorable impact on the values of
all properties in the City.
H) The beautiful wilderness area on the top
would be accessible and should provide lasting enjoyment
for the public at large. San Jacinto would become
the gateway to the mountains, which would funnel
lots of people through the community.
North Mountain itself provides the City with
a unique and valuable asset that most communities would
O2/2E,%19 1 10: FPUy U1T
Tit
..04
long for. The fact that it is already recognized internationally
as one of the premier places on earth to hang glide and paraglide
is very significant in itself.
2) Annexation. Annexation proceedings will take
approximately one year, and this process should begin as soon as
possible and run concurrently with procedures involved in
obtaining approval for the Specific Plan and Tentative Map, The
cost for annexation will be borne by the Developer.
3) Specific Plan. Approval of this memorandum shall be
deemed a conceptual approval of the development concept,' All
parties realize that it will not constitute approval of a the
Specific Plan and Environmental impact Report (EIR), which will
be processed in the normal manner following City, County, State
and if applicable Federal guidelines.
4) Zoning. The City acknowledges that the Developer is
attempting to acquire additional contiguous property for future
development, in order to help amortize the high costs of the
infrastructure and enhance the economic and social viability of
the project. If successful, subject again to normal processing
for a Specific Plan and EIR, the City agrees to cooperate with
the Developer to allow annexation and proper zoning to include it
in the overall project.
5) Approvals. The City shall, to the extent consistent with
its established rules and regulations, expeditiously respond to
planning and development submissions made by Developer, including
the approval of tentative and final maps, realizing that in this
financial environment the issue of project financing cannot even
be initiated until one has achieved a tentative map.
6) Environmental Issues. The parties acknowledge that if a
biological survey which has been performed by competent parties
indicates that Stephens Kangaroo Rat habitat either does not
exist or will not be adversely affected by this development, that
no further mitigation will be required of the developer.
Concurrently, providing water to the mountain top could provide
us opportunities for ecological enhancement of the natural areas
both within and on the border of our project, and the Parties
agree to L^'ork toy+*ar ds this goal with other regulatory or
environmental groups.
2 9 1 1 kl 3.2 FR[M I tJ E.,t•J. • •
TJ 171465t.::....•
7/ Creation of Financial Districts. The parties acklioledge
the high cost of infrastructure owing primarily to the need to
pump water uphill 2,000', create a sewage processing plant on
site and create improved road(a) and other means of providing
proper access to the site, that the formulation of financial
districts and utilization of bond financing will be an important
aspect of financing the project. The City agrees to cooperate
with the Developer and Co -Developer in making this financing
vehicle available to the Developer. Concurrently, the Developer
agrees to cooperate in other ways to enhance the economic and
social benefits of this project to the City.
8) Cooperation with Other Agencies. The parties acknowledge
the need and desireability of inter -facing with County, State and
Federal agencies to provide ssfe enjoyment of this project and
the surrounding Lands, and agree to work towards joint
cooperative agreements wherever possible, such as with the and
Bureau of Land Management for development of a trail system and
other recreation activities as part of their "Recreation 2000"
program; the California Division of Forestry for fire prevention
and control; County Parks for improvement of their park at. State
Street abutting the San Jacinto River to provide other
recreational amenities such as an equestrian area, which is best
suited near Soboba Summit but not necessarily on site; and job
training programs which could be done in conjunction with local
educational institutions and supported with County, State and
Federal Funds; and creation of affordable housing for employees
through utilization of City, CountY, State and Federal funds.
9) Issuesand Concerns at the Bottom of the Mountain. The
parties acknowledge that the bottom of the mountain is in the
Alquist Prioio seismic study zone, and that fixed structures for
human occupancy have a set back requirement from identifiable
faults. The parties also acknowledge that slope stability and
hydrology are concerns, and will be addressed in detail in
submitting development plans. The parties also acknowledge that
the proposed development originated from a sand and gravel
operation which accomplished the rough grading for eventual
development as the extraction, processing and selling of base
materials and aggregates took place. In that we are only down to
approximate grade on the west end of the property, and it will
take another seven to eight years to get down to grade on the
east end, the intent is to continue to mine west to east,
reclaiming and developing as we go, at the same time keeping
buffer :zone between the developed areas and mining activities.
10:32
FROM I14TEi
TO 171465€'. =8
P.06
The continuation of the sand and gravel operation is very
important economically to the Co -Developer and in turn the
project. Concurrently, the operation creates jobs, provides tax
revenues and provides materials required in the community and on
this project. To the extent that these activities can continue
without significant adverse environmental impacts for the project
or surrounding residential areas, full and objective
consideration should be given to retain these activities for
their intrinsic contribution to both the project' and the
community.
10) Access to the Mountain Top. Alternate routes have been
explored by both the Developer .and the >City, and 'deemed
unavailable. The City acknowledges the economic desireability of
the main access route to the top coming from San Jacinto and
agrees to support the Developer's ,request to construct such a
road. The Developer has a right to access the mountain top by
building a road up the face of the mountain on his own property.
This road will be built to City and County standards with regard
to width, surface, lighting' and grade angle, unless deviations'
are approved by the City. Given the high visibility of such a
road,the parties agree to make it as aesthetically pleasing and
exciting as possible as it will become the "grand entrada" to
Soboba Summit. The intent will be to restrict vehicular access
to the mountain top to residents and service/emergency vehicles,
and encourage the use of shuttle busses and the aerial tram.
This will help preserve the pristine nature of the mountain top,
yet still provide quick and easy access to those that want to
enjoy Soboba Summit or the Forestry land beyond.
In closing, the parties agree that the reality of our
achievement can be no greater that the dream from which it
originated.- While SOBOBA SUMMIT is perceived by some as a big
dream, it would be a dramatic under utilization of a precious
asset to impose on North Mountain a lesser dream. While all
parties acknowledge - that this is in some ways a more difficult'
project than the norm, they also acknowledge that it is a highly
attainable project if we work together in spirit and deed as
public/private partnership, and hereby commit to do so.
w 02/26/1771 10:33 FROMIt!TF 2C
TO 17146.`:
7v-
P.07
CITY
ATTEST:
City Clerk of the City of
San Jacinto, California`
DEVELOPER
By:
THE TORREY GROUP
a California
Limited Partnership
THE TORREY GROUP,
a California
corporation
Keith Christian, Pres.
CITY OF SA- JACINTO
YE,
Mayor, City of San
Jacinto,i''California
NORTH MOUNTAIN PARTNERS, a
California General Partnership
By:
INTERMAC,`INC., a
California Corporation
Roger D. Morgan, Pres.
RESOLUTION NO. 1941
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO OF INTEREST
IN THE PROCESSING OF THE "SOBOBA
SUMMIT" SPECIFIC PLAN ON NORTH
MOUNTAIN.
WHEREAS, an application for "Soboba Summit", a
destination resort specific plan in the North Mountain area
overlooking San Jacinto have been submitted to the City for
consideration.
WHEREAS, this proposal includes the development of a
hotel, commercial space, housing, recreational amenities
including a golf course, a road from Soboba Road to the
development, and possibly a tramway from the bottom of the
mountain to the top.
WHEREAS, the North Mountain area is designated as
hillside area and a specific plan area and is subject to the
City's Hillside Development Regulations.
WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report is required
for this project.
WHEREAS, the Bureau of Land Management, under its
"Recreation 2000" program, is developing a plan to open up
federal land to public use.
WHEREAS, "Soboba Summit" provides opportunities to
cooperate with the Bureau of Land Management program.
WHEREAS, there are no similar types of developments in
the San Jacinto Valley.
WHEREAS, a destination resort will help the City meet
its housing allocation; bring tourism to the City; enhance
its revenue base; and create jobs for low/moderate income
households.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE
That it is interested in the application for "Soboba
Summit" specific proceeding through the zoning and EIR
process so it can adequately weigh,thefiyacts on the
area versus t.he benefits; u4.& t4_-,t4-.. ,2/
Staff is directed to expedite applications for
annexation and to the extent possible, the specific
plan.
Adoption of this resolution does not obligate the
Council to approve the "Soboba Summit" specific plan.
The City will cooperate in facilitating use of
available public financing mechanisms for the
development, at no cost to the City, should the
development be approved.
The City will require the developer to execute a
development agreement to assure the quality of the
project, should it be developed.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED on the 5th day
March. 1991.
ATTEST:
Mayor
Deputy City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
The forgoing is certified to be a true copy of
Resolution No. 1941 duly adopted by the said City Council
the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein.
Deputy City Clerk
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
ORDINANCE NO. 931
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING
TRUCK ROUTES WITHIN THE CITY.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA,
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Purpose
The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish
highways within the City which shall be designated for
commercial vehicles exceeding 14,000 pounds gross vehicle
weight rating (GVWR).
Section 2. Definition
Whenever in this Ordinance the following terms are
used, they shall have the meanings respectfully ascribed
to them in this section.
1. City - means the City of San Jacinto.
2. Highway - shall have the same meaning set forth
in California Vehicle Code Section 360.
3. Commercial Vehicle - shall have the same
meaning set forth in California Vehicle Code
Section 260.
4. Commercial Vehicle Route - means that portion
of the highway under jurisdiction of the City,
upon which commercial vehicles shall be
restricted with a GVWR of 14,000 pounds or more
and a combined length not exceeding the
requirements of Section 35400(b)(4) of the
California Vehicle Code.
5. Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA)
Route - means that portion of the highway under
jurisdiction of the City, upon which commercial
vehicles shall be restricted with a GVWR of
2
14,000 pounds or more and a combined length not
3 exceeding the requirements of Section 35401(a)
4 and (b) of the California Vehicle Code.
5 6. Terminal - shall have the same meaning set
6
forth in California Vehicle Code Section
35401.5(d).
8
911 Section 3.
Except as designated hereinafter, it shall be
unlawful to operate any commercial vehicle on highways
within the City when the gross vehicle weight rating
exceeds 14,000 pounds unless such commercial vehicle is
operated upon designated Commercial Vehicle Routes. A
commercial vehicle may operate on restricted highways
26
that the length of neither the semi-trailer nor the
trailer in the combination of vehicles exceeds 28 feet 6
28
inches, unless the commercial vehicle is operated on STAA
29
designated routes.
30
Section 4.
3
The following highways are hereby designated as
"Commercial Vehicle Routes" for commercial vehicles which
10
11
12
13
14
15
8
9
10
11
12
exceed 14,000 pounds GVWR and the overall length does not
exceed the requirements of California Vehicle Code
Section 35400(b)(4): (Exhibit A)
A. Ramona Expressway from the westerly most City
limits to the easterly most City limits.
B. Sanderson Avenue from the Ramona Expressway
southerly to the southern most City limits.
C. State Street from State Route 79 southerly to
the southern most City limits.
D. Esplanade Avenue from the westerly most City
limits, easterly to the Ramona Expressway.
E. Seventh Street from State Street, Easterly to
State Route 79.
The following highways are hereinafter designated as
"STAA Routes" for commercial vehicles which exceed 14,000
pounds GVWR and the overall length does not exceed the
requirements of California Vehicle Code Section 35401(b):
(Exhibit A)
A. Ramona Expressway from the westerly most City
limits to the easterly most City limits.
B. Sanderson Avenue from the Ramona Expressway
southerly to the southern most City limits.
C. State Street from the Ramona Expressway
southerly to Seventh Street.
Section 5.
Vehicles subject to Sections 1031 to 1036,
inclusive, of the Public Utilities Code and commercial
vehicles used exclusively for the collection and
transportation of garbage, rubbish, or refuse shall not
be prohibited from using any highway within the City.
Section 6.
This Ordinance shall not be effective until
appropriate signs are erected indicating the streets
affected by the Ordinance.
2
3
4
5
6
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
29
0
3
.3
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council
2 of the City of San Jacinto, California, held on the
3 5th day of March , 1991.
4 MOVED, PASSED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
5 said City Council duly held on , 1991
6 by the following notes:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
9
10
12
13
14
15
16 City Clerk
Mayor
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
99
30
31
32
MEMORANDUM
T
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
Nancy Randolph, Deputy City Clerk
February 28, 1991
City of San Jacinto Mission Statement
Endorsement of the Mission Statement for the City of San Jacinto,
has been placed on the Agenda for your consideration and
adoption. The Mission Statement was developed from the input
received during the recent City Council Retreat on February 15
and 16, 1991.
MMSIKON
THE
CITY OF
SAN JACINTO
To Build Upon and
Enjoy Our Special Heritage.
To Create an Attractive,
Well Planned and Balanced Community
Which Supports Our Citizens and Businesses.
To Provide a Safe and Healthy
Community That Offers Employment,
Recreational and Cultural Opportunities.
To Promote Pride in San Jacinto.
This Mission Statement was developed by the City Council
at their retreat on February 16, 1991.