Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 12/4/1990AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 625 South Pico, San Jacinto DATE: December 4, 1990 TIME• 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL: Rose, Divine, Redding, Boykin, Ford PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE I .. SPECIAL PRESENTATION Presentation to Richard Hixson, Planning Commissioner, for years of service. II CONSENT CALENDAR - Old Business NOTICE TO PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar- are considered to be routine and will be',enacted by one motion by the' City Council in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the. City Council, staff or the public requests specified items to be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come forward, upon invitation Ofi the Mayor, state their name, address, and the Consent Calendar item number. A. Approval of Minutes of November 20, 1990, B. Approval of Warrant Nos. 23665 through 23845 as submitted by the City Manager. C Claim of Donna Nammar for damages in the amount of $948.00. (City Attorney recommends payment of claim in the amount of $217.80.) D. Claim of James K. and Doreen G. Vehawn for -damages in the amount of '$366.66. (City Attorney recommends denial.) E, Financial Report of Activity for the period ending November 30, 1990. (Receive and File). 2-04-90 Agenda Page 2 IV. F. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1920 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, reciting the fact of the General Municipal election held in said City on November 6, 1990 declaring the result thereof and such other matters as are provided by law. G. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda pursuant to City Attorney, END OF CONSENT CALENDAR - OLD BUSINESS Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to approve consent calendar items A through G and adopt Resolution. No. 1920 and waive the reading in full. Vote: PUBLIC HEARINGS Old Business A. Planned Unit Development 1-90, Vesting Ten 26246, and Variance 7-90. (continued from Applicant: Khaloghli and Associates Location:' northeast corner of Cottonwood and Kirby Street Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 922 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, Californian approving Planned Unit Development 1-90, amending Zoning Nap of the City of San Jacinto. Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to introduce Ordinance No. 922 approving Planned Unit Development 1-90, amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto and waive the reading in full; grant negative. declaration, and ratify Variance. 7-90. ative Tract 11-20-90.) Avenue MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/COMMENTS A. Selection of a landscape architect firm to provide assistance in design and development of San Jacinto Memorial (Hofmann Park). (Memo to be distributed 12/4, due to interviews being conducted on 12/3). PRESENTATIONS TO OUTGOING COUNCIL Marc'Divine Lester Redding 12-04-90 Agenda Page 3 VI. CITY CLERK A. Oath of Office for newly elected officials Councilman Trammell Ford Councilman Henry Hafliger. Councilwoman Janet Leahy City Clerk Maurice Armster City Treasurer Kenneth Leahy Selection of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem VII CONSENT CALENDAR - New Business A. Authorization to enter into contract for Development of a Police Service Impact Model (PSIM) for Future Planning within the Police Department. (Staff recommends approval.) B. Reduction of Sewer Performance Bonds for Tract 24745. for Tract 24745. Applicant: Forecast Corporation Location: First St. & Vernon Ave. (Staff recommends Bond be reduced from $76,544.00 to $15,000.00). C. Resolution for Adoption Resolution No. 1914 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto supporting the concept of a transportation corridor study for the Hemet/San Jacinto/Winchester area and to support the submission of an Assembly Concurrent Resolution that would request same study to be completed by State Department of Transportation D. Reduction of Bonds for Parcel Map 25021 Applicant: GGP Investments Location: 700 N. Idyllwild Drive (Staff recommends reduction of Performance Bond from $39,752.28 to $10,000.00 only.) E. Change Order - Downtown Water Main Project Approval of Change Order #1 - B & Sons (Staff recommends approval.) F. Notification from City Clerk Maurice Armster of deputizing of Nancy Randolph to serve as Deputy City Clerk. (Receive and file). G. Award of Bid to re -roof Community Center and Fire Department to Desert Valley Roofing in an amount not to exceed $15,750. t. i (Q41. 12-04-90 Agenda Page 4 END OF CONSENT CALENDAR - NEW BUSINESS Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to approve consent calendar items A through G and adopt Resolution No. 1914 and waive the reading in full. Vote: VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS - New Business A. Change of Zone 17-90 Applicant: Pedro Sanchez Proposal for a Change of Zone from A, Agricultural to R- 1, Single Family on approximately 4.76 acres generally located south of Shaver Street at Miramar Avenue. (Planning Commission recommends approval.) Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 924 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Change of Zone 17-90 amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto, Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to introduce Ordinance No. 924 to second reading and waive the reading in full Vote: B. Change of Zone 21-90 Applicant: Steve Holgate Proposal for a Change of Zone from R-1, Single Family to C-2, General Commercial on approximately .94 acres located 660' east of Sanderson Avenue between Cottonwood Avenue and Seventh Street within Tentative Parcel Map 26119 (Planning Commission recommends approval.) Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 925 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Change of Zone 21-90 amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto. Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to introduce Ordinance No. 925 to second reading and waive the reading in full. Vote C. Change of Zone 22-90 Applicant: Esplanade Associates Proposal for a Change of Zone from R-3, Multi Family to C-2, General Commercial on approximately 4.63 acres located on the southwest corner of Esplanade Avenue and Santa Fe Avenue. (Planning Commission recommends approval.) 12-04-90 Agenda Page 5 Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 923 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Change of Zone 22-90 amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto. Motion by Seconded by: Action: to introduce Ordinance No. 923 to second reading and waive the reading in full. Vote: D. Change of Zone 24-90 Applicant: City Initiated Proposal for a pre -annexation Change of Zone to A, Agricultural in the unincorporated area located north of Cottonwood Avenue, east of Lyon Avenue, between Chase and Young. Street and west of Palm Avenue. Planning Commission recommends approval.) Ordinance -for Introduction - Ordinance No. 926 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California approving Change of Zone 24-790 amending Zoning Map`of the City of San Jacinto Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to introduce Ordinance No. 926 to second reading, subject to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration. IX. A. Ray Johnson The Villas water issue X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/COMMENTS A. San Jacinto Chamber of Commerce - Request for funds B. Consideration of proposed Weed Abatement committee and recommended composition XI. ADJOURNMENT Motion by: Seconded by: to December 18, 1990 at 7:30 p. Vote: Action: to adjourn Meeting adjourned at Next regular City Council meeting December 18, 1990. MINUTES San Jacinto City Council and the Council Sitting as the Redevelopment Agency and the Industrial Development Authority Regular Adjourned Meeting 20 November 1990 The regular meeting of the San Jacinto City Council, the Council sitting as the Redevelopment Agency and Industrial Development Authority was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mayor Ford at the Community Center, 625 S. Pico Avenue. Roll Call - Present: Councilmen Boykin, Divine, Ford, Redding and Rose. Staff Members - City Manager Easter, Community Development Director McNabb, Asst. City Manager Garcia, Police Chief Kozma, Fire Chief Chadwick, and City Attorney Jim Cox. Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor Ford. 1. SPECIAL PRESENTATION to Raymond Carlson, Planning Commissioner postponed due to Mr. Carlson not being available. II. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes 1990. B. Approval of Warrant 23762 in the amount the City Manager. C. Application for Leave to present Late Claim of George G. Kyriopoulos for damages in the amount of $160.00. (City Attorney recommends acceptance of Late Claim and denial of claim.) D. Claim of James F. Marrs for damages in the amount of $815.56. (City Attorney recommends approval.) E. Request from Soboba Springs Country Club to Discharge Firearm Within the City Limit. (Staff recommends denial.) F. Resolution No. 1911 for adoption, determining Karen Gaskin to be disabled and that said disability arises out of her employment. (Staff recommends adoption.) G. Resolution No. 1916 for adoption, indicating preliminary intent to form an Assessment District for Flood Control Purposes. H. Ordinance No. 917 for adoption, establishing certain fees and adopting the Uniform Fire Code, 1988 Edition, with certain amendments, the Uniform Fire of October 30 and November 6, Nos. 23529 and 23640 through of $495,596.00 as submitted by 11-20-90 Minutes Page 2 Code Standards, 1988 Edition, and the National Fire Protection Association Standards 13-D, 1989 Edition, and 13-R, 1989 Edition and repealing ordinance 815. I. Ordinance No. 918 for adoption, amending the Uniform Building Code (1988 Edition). J. Approval of Public Works Director job classification and salary range. (Staff recommends approval.) K. Claim of Laura & Carmen Hernandez for damages in the amount of $100,000. (City Attorney recommends denial.) L. Consideration of proposal to develop economic development/promotional video tapes. (Staff recommends endorsement of concept and direct Staff to explore feasibility with Jimco Broadcast Consultants.) M. Resolution No. 1917 for adoption, setting a public hearing for the annexation of certain territory generally located surrounded by Park Avenue, north of Devonshire Avenue, west of Meridian Street in the Hemet/San Jacinto area (Annexation No. 60) and giving notice thereof. N. Resolution No. 1918 for adoption, setting a public hearing for the annexation of certain territory generally located south of Commonwealth Avenue, east of State Street, west of AT&SF Railway (Annexation No. 61) and giving notice thereof. 0. Resolution No. 1919 for adoption, endorsing the Air Quality Management Plan and committing to development of a Compliance Program. P. Acceptance of Posting Agenda pursuant to City Attorney recommendation. Motion by Councilman Boykin to add item Q. to Consent Calendar and reading as follows: Q. Request for authorization to purchase two non -police package vehicles authorized in the 1990/1991 Budget. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Vote: 4-1 (Divine). Councilman Divine requested that the record show he was voting "no" in opposition to item being placed on Consent Calendar and not as separate item. Councilman Redding requested Item E be pulled for separate consideration. 11-20-90 Minutes Page 3 Dave Cottington (P-R Corp.), 1655 E. 6th St., Corona, addressed Council on Item H, (establishing certain fees related to Fire and Safety Inspection Program), requesting consideration that CFD #2 is already paying fire and safety fees in Tax A and B [$96.40 per house, per year] and should be excluded from additional fees. Attorney Cox stated that only $5.00 of this Tax B is for fire safety. Mr. Cottington concluded that he would appreciate Council's consideration and that his opinions were now on record. Motion by Councilman Boykin to approve consent calendar items A through Q (less E), adopt Resolution Nos. 1911, 1916, 1917, 1918, 1919 and Ordinance Nos. 917 and 918 and waive the readings in full. Seconded by Councilman Divine. Vote: 5-0. II. E. Request from Soboba Springs Country Club to discharge firearm within the City Limit. Councilman Redding stated that he had checked on noise makers and found that geese/fowl ignore them as they become familiar with the sound. Chief Kozma stated that he had sent the Country Club a long term solution in January, 1990 and to date had not heard from them nor had Animal Control other than to request another firing (before Council tonight). Chief Kozma further stated that the City cannot continue to permit weapon discharge year after year in the City as it is against ordinance (blanks or otherwise) and that property owners need to take long-range steps to mitigate. Motion by Councilman Rose to allow discharge of blanks one final time and other alternatives must be found in future. Notification must be made to the Police Department (one day in advance) of firing. Seconded by Councilman Redding. Vote: 5-0. Councilman Boykin stated that Council gave this same motion last year and he voted for their new firing hesitantly. 11-20-90 Minutes Page 4 III.PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Planned Unit Development 1-90, Vesting Tentative Tract 26246, and Variance 7-90. (continued from 11- 6-90.) Applicant: Khaloghli and Associates Location: northeast corner of Cottonwood Avenue and Kirby Street Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 922 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, approving Planned Unit Development 1-90, amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto. (Staff recommends continuance to 12/4/90). Brian McNabb, Community Development Director, addressed Council advising that two (2) items requested in Council motion of 11-6-90 had not been addressed to satisfaction at this time and that Staff was awaiting feedback from EMWD on policy on dead-end lines and the school on their concerns. Motion by Councilman Boykin to leave the Public Hearing open and continue to 12-4-90. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Vote: 5-0, III.B. Annexation No. 62, approximately 65 acres, located north of Cottonwood Avenue, west of State Street, east of Lyon Avenue and southwest of DeAnza Drive. (continued from 11-6-90). Councilman Rose, Brian McNabb and City Manager Easter met with Mr. Irving on 11-19-90 and discussed Mr. Irving's concerns. Public Hearing remains open from 11-6-90. Ed Adkison, representing Al Sykes (applicant for annexation), 6830 Airport Drive, Riverside, stated he was available for any questions Council might have. The Mayor closed the Public Hearing. Motion by Councilman Rose to adopt Resolution No. 1915, ordering the annexation of certain uninhabited territory to the City of San Jacinto (Annexation No. 62). Seconded by Councilman Redding. Vote: 4-1 (Divine). 11-20-90 Minutes Page 5 Councilman Boykin stated that although he had earlier voted against the annexation, he was now comfortable that Mr. Irving is not opposed to the annexation. IV. ORAL COMMUNICATION A. Review of 1990 Annual Potato Festival Event - Linda Scott. Linda Scott relayed to Council that 30,000 people had attended the Potato Festival this year and that on October 31, she had met with Staff and relayed that the merchants had complimented the police patrol and stated that the area was much cleaner after the event this year. Linda further stated that the RACES group had been very helpful with the event. Several items mentioned for future consideration were more trash bins and temporary restrooms facilities. Council suggested that more lighting near the beer area be obtained and that the permanent City trash cans not be used during the event as they are difficult to remove trash from. Additionally, a recap of City expenses was provided to Council showing a total expense to the City for the event of $4,473.92. B. Request for Children's Christmas Program in Hofmann Park - Linda Scott. Motion by Councilman Boykin to authorize use of Hofmann Park for the Business Association's Children's Christmas Program on December 15, 1990 between 12:00 and 5:00 p.m. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Vote: 5-0. V. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/COMMENTS A. San Jacinto Valley Museum - Annual Museum Day Motion by Councilman Redding to proclaim December 1, 1990 as "Annual Museum Day", request of barricades to be placed in front of Museum on December 1, 1990 ( 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.) be approved and permission granted to hold sidewalk "Book Sale" and display art exhibit. Seconded by Councilman Divine. Vote: 5-0. 11-20-90 Minutes Page 6 B. San Jacinto Sister Cities Committee - Request for Legal Assistance - Mayor Pro Tem Boykin Councilman Boykin relayed the desire of the Sister City Committee to form a non-profit corporation within the Valley and requested the City Attorney be used to file the necessary papers with the State and get the incorporation going. The Committee has learned that Zukovsky (Russian city) is designated a "closed city", but that the Committee is still working on a Sister City designation with them. Motion by Councilman Divine for City Attorney services to be provided by City for incorporation of Sister City Committee with non-profit status. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Vote: 5-0. City Attorney Cox advised Council that he would provide the services to the Committee at no charge to the City. C. Planning Commissioner Appointments - Mayor Ford (continued from 11-6-90). Mayor Ford recommended that Dave VerPlank be reappointed to a full term, Yvonne Iacono be appointed to a full term and that Robert Howe be appointed to complete the term of resigning Commissioner Carlson. The two full terms to expire on October 31, 1994 and the term being filled by Mr. Howe to expire on October 31, 1992. Motion by Councilman Boykin to ratify the Mayor's recommended appointments. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Vote: 5-0 Councilman Divine requested information on the recycling meeting held 11-20-90. City Manager Easter relayed to Council that the committee had met with O.K. Associates regarding recycling and other matters. O.K. is proposing a once a week collection and no pilot program, but to begin with all residential accounts in the City. O.K. briefly described the equipment to the committee and it was concluded that O.K. would call for a second meeting to be set up after further review of proposal. City Manager Easter relayed that a full report would be 11-20-90 Minutes Page 7 provided Council after the next meeting with O.K. which would include the cost of the program. Councilman Redding stated that the program also needs the cooperation of the commercial accounts in the City. City Manager Easter agreed and stated that O.K. is proposing beginning with residential and then going to commercial. Ms. Easter further stated that Waste Management and the City of Hemet have made an offer to work with the City on our recycling program. Councilman Divine stated that weed abatement problems exist and that a committee should be formed to look into a weed abatement ordinance and that abatement notices should be sent to property owners by registered mail to provide proof of delivery. If a citizen committee is formed, Councilman Divine volunteered to serve as a property owner and suggested a weed abater also be included in committee. City Manager Easter suggested that Chief Chadwick would develop a proposed composition of the Committee for consideration by the Council for the Dec. 4 Agenda. Councilman Boykin requested update on power at Hewitt and Commonwealth. Mr. McNabb gave estimate of three weeks. City Manager Easter gave an update of the Valleywide transportation meeting that occurred on 11-19-90 and included a large valley -wide representation. A Task, Force will be formed to look at issues, program and budget. Assemblyman Kelley is also proposing State legislation that would request Cal -Trans to conduct a study of existing and potential new transportation corridors in the Hemet/San Jacinto and Winchester area. A proposed City resolution supporting this proposed State legislation will be submitted for Council consideration on their Dec. 4 Agenda. 11-20-90 Minutes Page 8 Motion by Councilman Boykin to adjourn to December 4, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. Seconded by Councilman Rose. Vote: 5-0. Meeting adjourned at 9:02 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Nancy Randolph Deputy City Clerk ^^ CI"It Y OF SA� JACINTO 0LC112 REGI3TEkF IITED DEMANDS CHECK P E 1 r������ �� � �����8���������. UNITED CALIF[.�NIA BANK A/C ?O1398 -\TAiE� ISSUED TU 23665* U`S+ PO3TMA3TER 23666* B & MINE; CONSTRUCTION �3667* FLOYD JOHNSTON CONST, 23'668* VIDO SAHA�ZICH ZI763* BAKRY �ACKLUND 23764* OMNICHPOME 23765* S�CUKITY PACI�IC NATID� 23766* KENKD INC^ 23767* DOET|{ING TREELAND FARMS 23708* CI[Y OF SAN J4�ICINT0 23769* FIRST IN(ERSTATE BANK 2377O* STATE OF CALIFOBNlA 23771* RIVER3IDE CO~ EMP^ 23772* PUBLIC EMP^ �SSOC^ 23773* S.J. POLICE ASSOC^ I3774* FIRST INTERSTATE BANK 23775* MATICH CORPORATI6N 23776* U^S, POSTMASTER 23777* S^J. WORKERS COMP. 23778* EASTERN MUNI^WATER DlST 237NOW 23782 23783 23784 23785 2��786 23787 23788 23789 2379O 123791 23792 23793 23794 23795 23796 23797 2379B 73799 238OO 238O1 23802 232O3 23�04 23805 23E',�06 23807 238OB 238O9 2381O 23G11 BOB WILSON BILL RUTLEDGE RICHARD HIXSUN DAVID VER PLANK GLENN TAYLOR A .... 1 LOCK & KEY AATV & ELECTRONICS ALPHA BETA ARROW PRINTIM8 E.S. BABCOCK & SONS BOB�S LUMBER CALIFORNIA REVELOPMNT, CITY OF SAN JACINTO STEVE MC MILLON HIGUEL ESQUIVIAS WILLIAM KUHN GA�Y CORETTI JEFF GCHWERTFEGE8 KEITH 8ALLOWAY WINDSOR HOMES FRANCISCO TOPETF FLOYD JDHNSTON CODY TELLIS BRUCE BRAY KATHLEEN MARQUEZ FOAL. PH/NANCY REYNOLDS CDM SER CO^ COX & COX W+S^ DARLEY & CO, EL~CO CONTRACTORS DESCRIP[ION :MOUNT WIMBURIF POSTGAE METER 950.00 DGW!NTOW� WATERLINE 7O'602^95 RETENTIDN.... C,F^D' 41;2 75324.59 I��TION-C.F,D5'245,69 L�SER T�AININS 43,5O TRAINI���P^D, 700^00 LE�SE ��YMENTS-�PO'S 513,476^75v RETE�TIDN'`C.F^D^ �2 121/339^14 MATERI�L�C^F^D^ �2 096^98 KET PWYROLL 9O'716°76 �EDE��L TAXES 13^737.12 STATE T��ES 2,894^74 CREDIT ;NION 2,116.5O PERC 360^28 KJPD DUES 1,1,17.00 FEDERAL TAXES 1+295122 CF.D42 417O3+ell 4 ��LK M�ILING~PLANHING 400^00 ���IHB���E ACCOUNT 2O,152.51 SEWER COLI.ECTIONG 551602°13 �EC�UIT�ENT�PD^ 500.00 9EI�DDIESEL 13^71 PC �EETING 100^00 PC �EETING 100^00 PC MEETING 100^00 PC MEETING 100+OO SERV%CES 50^30 REF�IR �ICROPHONES 323^60 TRA�SPO�TATION MEETING 9^43 EHVELOPES-P,D^ 262,6O LAP TESTS 64.00 REDIMIX~SEWER DEPT^ 22^1O SE�IN�� 7O5^O� CDNUMvER DEPOSITS 1/O67^4O COHSUMEIR DEPOSIT 9^68 CGNSUME� DEPOSIT 28^28 CSNSMDEPOSlT 37.13 CONSUM[� DEPOSIT 30^69 C3�SUM[� DEPOSIT JAB ^77 C(�NSUME� DEPOSIT 20^69 �3NSUME� DEPOSIT 5OO~0O CG�SU��� DEF'OSIT 25.85 CSNSU�ER DEPOSIT 351,37 CGNSUMEIR DEPOSIT 28.47 COINSUME� DEPOSIT 3^98 DEPOSIT 17^69 CGHSU#IR DEPOSIT 50,00 M�INTE�ANCE 1/137^80 PPC-iFESSIONAL SERVICE .... OCTOBER 19�p0 3'355,00 Gi,L/GE-F^D^ 117^10 REPL^ PKKING GLANDS-HEWITT & SHAV. 1,O95,24 k1joid and reissue of Check No. 23662 on 11/15/90 Demand Register 8LCD12 * `~ CJACINTO � REGI8�l�� 8F �iD jITED DEMANDS PAGE 2 CHECK 23612 2381� 23G15 23816 2��G17 23818 23819 2M2O 23(�21 23 82 2 23823 230324 23�':-;25 23H26 23827 23828 23829 2383O 23831 2�832 23833 23834 23S35 23836 23837 23838 23839 2384O 23841 23842 23S43 23844 23B45 UNITED CALIFbRNIS I 2O1398 ISSUED TO FIRST MUNICIPAL DIVISID RUTH FORKNER HENRY GA�CIA GTE MOBILE COMM. GENERAL TELEPHDNE HEhET NEWS I^B^M, CORP' IN[ERNATIONAL COW I KARL's DUMF TRUCK MIKE KAZAROFF LAKEGIDE CHEVROLET LUPGS DRUG STORE AMETEK/MC CROMETER DM, �ARDEN~SUSCO JAMES F^ MARR� MATHEWSDN�S TRACTQR MOTOROLA C^ & E^ INC, NATL^ AUTO GLASS NORTON BATTERY MF�^ CO, PACIFIC A-1 FIRE EQPT^ PITNEY BOWES MIKE READE CHEV^ RIVERSIDE CGUNTy SAFETY~KLEEN CORP` SAN JACINTO MUS�UM SMART & FINAL SO. CALIFJRNIA EDISON TNT CATERING TRAVEL EMPDRIUM U`"'31^ P3STMASTER REGENTS, UC WHIBROTHEKS XE�OX CO1;,,'PORATI3N ZELLER PRINTING CO, DESCRIPTION DATE 11/30/9O BROOMSW[E�ER LEASE RE�T�L �TTENDANT HILMGE & LUNCH ... RISK MGMT, CONF. HGBILE TELEPHONE TELAHIM^ ADVE�TI�ING LNSE/R[NTAL U-PC LICATTON -PLNG. DEPT, WEED YNTEHENT �EED ���TEMEN� L&TER M[TER03 WTRPI�E & SUPPLIES PAY��EHT OF C-LAIM �EED Al)�TEMENT CELLUL�R PHONES K''9 �I�DS|�IELI/~P.D, BATTE�I�S~P,D^ & PLANNING C�E�ICAL-F^D^ E�UIPM[#T HCAINT^ ;EHICL� PARTS~^P^D, DU�P SITE Si�fLI�� C�RATO� SERVlCES S�PPLIES UTILITY DE;ELO��ENT LUNCH AIR FAR[�WIL5ON FURMIT FEE SEMIH��~KEN�O@ SHREDD[�^P.�. 3RY IN: CHRISTM�S CA�DS AMOUNT 1,565^25 40^OO 34^O8 46^76 1,�79^01 231^03 546,00 oil. ^2O 4'468^Out 1,623,1O 3O.66 4^25 22S,30 36.3O B15'56 1r86O^00 471^01 215^43 173^58 38^15 125,00 5O,75 6O2,O0 132,OO 1'475^00 11~58 4'884~97 37,63 151^0O 6O^O0 85^0O l^MY) °46 5,298,97 37.36 FINAL TOTAL 1,O8O'680^77 C MEMO TO: FROM: PAMELA,tEASTER SUBJECT: CLAIM OF DONNA MANNAR FOR LOSS OF BICYCLE DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 1990 MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL The purpose of this memorandum is to transmit Jim Cox's recommendation to approve partial sum of $217.80 to Donna Nammar on her claim of a lost bicycle. The correspondence attached provides background on the claim. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended by the City Attorney that the City Council approve Donna Nammar's claim in the partial sum of $217.80. TE: F M: SUBJECT: COX & COX : professional Corporation Attorneys at Caw 805 East Florida Avenue Hemet, California 9234a (714) 652-1400 PAX #(714) 652-3990 November 25, 19g0 Nancy Randolph. Jim Cox MITT E 65 4 3728 Donna N arw ar, Claim for lost bicycle Dear Nancy, Enclosed is a cozy of the letter we received from Donna's ttorney regarding the lost bicycle. We should treat this letter as a sort claim. Also enclosed is a letter 1 sent to she insurance Co. for the ma who hit Donna. They have agreed to pay the amount.as proposed in m letter amount in full. Please 'ple matter onthe agenda ?Donn 's clai in the pa t a 2,' PAGES :NCLUDING \COVER SETE auks.. oapprove IE YOU .DONOT R Celve ALL GCS, PLEAS E.CALE (714i 652-1400 AND ASK FOR PAT HARVEY S. KRIEGER ATTO8NEY AT LAW I00 SOUTH vFNCENT 4WENJE. SLIT307 WEST COVINA_ CALIFORNIA. 91780 PHONE (8 9) 9 9 STOF FAX iFNE 9 9-zezo October 26, 1990 Joseph M. Kozma Chief of Police City of San Jacinto 160 West 6th Street San Jacinto, CA 92383 Re: Ross S. Nammar and Donna Louise Nammar Dear Chief Kozma: IT / M an g : Office 0C-1-2 199C I • J This office is legal counsel for Donna Louise Nammar and her hus- band, Ross S. Nammar. I have been retained to recover damages for the personal injuries suffered by Mrs. Nammar when the bicycle she was riding was struck by a vehicle negligently operated by Arthur Bousema in San Jacinto, California, at the intersection of Ramona Expressway and State Street on June 20, 1990, at approximately 9:02 A.M. Mrs. Nammar was riding her multi -speed Raleigh bicycle at the time of the accident. Due to her multiple and severe in- juries, she was taken from the accident scene by ambulance to the hospital, and her bicycle was impounded for safekeeping by the investigating officer. Unfortunately and sadly, this bicycle later could not be found by your department, and its disappearance is still a mystery. Obviously, my primary interest in this case concerns the personal injuries suffered by Mrs. Nammar. This unfortunate accident has been compounded, however, by the unexplained disappearance of Mrs. Nammar's bicycle from the custodial care and responsibility of your department. In response to your letter, Mrs. Nammar wrote you on August 17, 1990, enclosing an estimate of replacement costs for the bicycle and its equipment. Mrs. Nammar submitted current market replace- ment costs since that is the measure of her damages if she has to now purchase a new bicycle with the same equipment. Her claim was for $948.00. Obviously, she and I would both prefer if the same bicycle could be returned to her. I understand that at the scene of the accident Mrs. Nammar was advised that the bicycle would be taken to the station for safe- keeping. When Mr. Nammar contacted the department the following Joseph M. Kozma Chief of Police City of San Jacinto Re: Ross S. Nammar and Donna Louise Nammar October 26, 1990 Page Two Monday, he was told that it was needed as evidence. After a week or so, when he began making additional contacts, he was told that someone would "find it." Somehow and in some way, this bicycle simply disappeared after it was taken into custody by your depart- ment. The police department should either return the bicycle or make restitution in the foam of its replacement value. Mrs. Narrar went to the trouble to go to the bicycle shop where she does all of her business and obtain an estimate from the owner of the shop, which she then submitted to you. I certainly hope that no extraneous personal feelings are getting in the way of a fair, immediate and proper resolution of this claim. While the loss or disappearance of this bicycle was ob- viously not intentional, it certainly occurred through no fault or negligence of my clients. I cannot recover property damages against the negligent operator when the bicycle cannot be repaired because it cannot now be found. If this had not occurred, what- ever the costs of repair to the bicycle would have been included in the action against the driver. This is no longer possible. For anyone in the department or City to take the position that the replacement value should be that of a damaged bicycle is an exercise in futility and frustration. While normally I might agree that the measure of damages is pro- perly the value of the bicycle in its damaged condition, when it is lost and cannot be repaired, my clients are without any recovery for the difference between the damaged bicycle and its replacement value as they are unable to determine what those damages and costs of repair were. On behalf of my clients, I request that their claim for $948.00, which represents the replacement value of the bicycle and the equipment, be paid without the necessity of belaboring this fur- ther. If the department can return this bicycle, even in its dam- aged condition, I will gladly pursue whatever claim there is for property damage against the driver and not the City. There is a principle of law which states that when and if damages are diffi- cult to ascertain, the party or parties who created the uncer- tainty must bear the burden. I respectfully suggest that this burden is not that of my clients. Joseph M. Kozma Chief of Police City of San Jacinto Re: Ross S. Nammar and Donna Louise Nammar October 26, 1990 Page Three The courtesy of your early consideration and response will be most sincerely appreciated. I respect the fact that the City Manager and City Attorney will be involved in arriving at this decision. I am therefore taking the liberty of sending copies of this letter to each of them as well. Certainly an early and quick disposition of this claim which has dragged on now for more than three months will De in everyone's best interests. H S K:clw cc: Mr. and Mrs. Ross S. Nammar ,-Ms. Pam Easter City Manager City of San Jacinto James Arlington Cox, Esq. City Attorney City of San Jacinto .i.1MCj A. C JY r->�€air"-+• Nov r 19 r 1933 C:QX, COX & CANrPEF , TTORNEYS AT LAW GC ENJL =F] LA C)L_ S. , >U HrMET, CAL{FORNIA 23au „ti :;,,r} 65P_31420 Ka t K+e Tndu;t.rial indemnity P 0 Bo{ 7034 San Er sco, calitorni.a 94120 Re: Claim NQ. 30390 your inserec: Bousema Construction Co. Dear Ms, Kelly; I am the City Attorney for the City of San Jacinto. I telephoned you with recard to the property damage sustained in the above referenced incident. As you know, Mrs. Nammar was struck by your insured while riding her bicycle. The bicycle frame and front fork were bent. Our City Police Department took possession of the bicycle salvage and thereafter lost it. I believe that your insured is responsible for the damages to the bicycle and that the City is responsible for the value of the salvage. I believe also, that due to the frame damage, the bicycle itself received total damage and that its salvage value was minimal. Enclosed is a list I have received from Mrs. Nammar which identi- fies the replacement value of the bicycle and equipment she lost. I spoke with Mrs. Nammar by telephone and she informs that she did not retain her receipts for purchase of these items, but that these amounts are the approximate amounts that she paid. Apparently, the bicycle was about one year old. I believe that the City is responsible for the full depreciated value of the extra equipment on the bicycle, plus perhaps $50.00 salvage for the bicycle itself. Assuming an over all 20% deprecia- tion from purchase price, the relative liabilities would be as follows: Kathy Kelly November 19, 1990 Pace 2 Industrial Tridemnitv Bicycle ($695 x - $50 = Tax (6..5%) City DIcycle Equipment ($194.24 x 80%) = Tax 6 . 0 0 5 3 8 . 8 9 $ 90.00 155.87 11.93 S217.80 I believe that this would be a reasonable offer to make to Mrs. Nammar to settle her property damage. Please notify me as to whether you concur and it this property damage matter can he resolved in this fashion. Sincerely, James A. Cox JAC:jla enclosures .'`_ /1 jV r(4.4.1, %Y LCZ 'f?k'TS L/(?o � t- t ate" �,` L��. e � ^� ., .� r .,lam ' S- i ' / 1 tY' ''--- 1 / / ( ! e_ e hr ,� 64 _� // / 2Y_ i 4 J c/ n r n /' i f �-^ 7- 1,4 + `f ' f ,f/ v 5 { `r / r+' � e tC.C q `',?` Po, �st`4 ,.` t, F111 i� "gyp ._J V 0,4 • , 2 - - V�< %I % , J-/('.J 1. / _. _ .—T".'r-" �- l _._ ET, CAL : FT; R h`IA ..? 3.13 November 26, 3990 Dear Ms, r, BQ,use';i 5:. My i o n. C O , lF.: t , you. your rti zep _: t-. eall this date 1. i2 r!'�UtJ ttse C: 't't `_V i �= o f T 7, r 1 i 9 !. t t f rC;pei.r)�,. ,9 7.+,I�i. !t �,t77 LOt7C`ArSaTTVr1, you agreed t p,;the .I?ounts Suggested in my letter to settle the bicycle darmi,_,e ol 3.im made by Mrs. Nammar. The damage cwi.d be covered' by -out payment in the sum of $538,89 and the City of San Jacyi�nto' S payment o!- $21r . 80. I telephoned Mrs. Nammar and he i ' agreeable total ' .,,? t to T.!1c... �c L:. settlement amount for the bicycle and eouipm r,t. , , fy, -� Approval of the , 5 portion of the payment Ies expected at our Cif Council meeting on 12/4/90 Would it be »pt I s_ b', fox'ou to send noti li eatifln to me 'rhen your pay- ment in made. I will provide you the same notice. Thanks so mue..h for your assistance and cooperation. Sincerely, James A. r Cox p'd=®,L_r,_ BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the matter of the Claim of against the City of San Jacinto The undersigned claimant hereby makes claim against the City of -- San Jacinto in the sum of $ claim represents as follows: 1. When did damage or injury occur? (Give exact date and hour) . LC (C{N 2. Where did the damage or injury occur? Icr 0‘. en, and in support of said 3. How did the damage or injury occur? (Give full details) 4. What particular act or omission on the part of City officers, servants or employees caused the injury or damage? • f'\ r, c t ra , L, 5. What are the names of the City officers, servants or employees causing the damage or injury? p„:h( , 6. What damage or injuries do you claim resulted? (Give full extent of injuries or damages claimed) 7. How was the amount claimed above computed? (Include the estimated amount o Names and addresse f any prospective injury or damage) a 0, --V,( s of witnesses, doctors or hospitals: k Cr‘ C),_( C Expenditures made on account of accident or injury: Date Item Amount Send Notices to: STATE OF CALIFORNIA l iJ Pf ici ) ss COUNTY OF laimant's Signature Address dul deposesfirstsorn, an sa at � e is the claimant above named,that read the foregoing claim and knows the contents thereof. That the same is true of his own knowledge except as to those matters therein stated on information and blief, and as to those matters, that he believes it to be true. SUBSCRI$ED.and sworn .tap before me this (0*F` day of IV ()o f ry) b'-P r 19 q . LIB ary Pub i c in 11) u e rs is ' and f the County of , State of California NOTICE Section 72 of the Penal Code provides: laimant's Sionati OFFICIAL SEAL GUADALUPE R. OU 4, AE<?Ll. NOT, PUBI r `ONaiA Rlb ch C C;ti, "1 i a0t E e J9,e 2 , "Every person who, with intent to defraud, presents for allowance or for payment to any state board or officer, or to any county, town, city, district, ward or village board or officer, authorized to allow or pay the same if genuine, any false or fraudulent claim, bill, account, voucher, or writing, is guilty of a felony." Most claims must be presented within one hundred (100) days of the haL , unless leave to file a late claim is granted. i ''- 3223 UEST FLORIDA AVENUE...Mg:N-6E1R .TIN ZIERES HEMET.• CA 9443-2' '7-0 • :• • (714)56-314E, BAR:REP&-t -C108305 . 11/fi1/90 11/C1/90 lit; • el : t)e-, FM • OP 7.1,4 rr ,:.„...-J'• W TERR: 747? T.*- NflNqTG: 19023 2,ILL TO: 'FOREFN VEHA!i,U N nILLON 'LT 7 / / 07.17v E2E Tr, NE,T4 TY.F/STJE 131ti CA F.22DUET ENE aTy DEKRIPTiD QTY. 2 ND, P:D:E:04(:)3 E! 14VIET; ROELFPT. TIRE DISPHAL LHARSE NEI4 VALVE- EiTE - CDMPUTER ERIN [AUTHORIZED GOODYEAR TIRE DEALER EC: L5PIECIH LINE T2TAL T.1K-701 P. 2 TiOW F4:',11:1-1 PKTE-711. AUTO .03 DEYEALT FAVDRITES Tol 7-=';;TGHTENER, HOLIDAY 7:. Al.;aJT D,2r. LiOJIYEAl' a±7, i ,,,RD. 7v3 w;1NUL MEHEERMP FEE i NO PAYENTH:JE IRJIL JAN nE '--....100 5R ME1.RF. A3K .30 5,) 1,:y3.34 PARTS. TOTAL 119.34 ' '‘ti""'AMBUIT- •63LAB IrTOTAL— RE 00 -SATE1IRE FEE' 147.34 , - Av.,- IA tiPALERIBUti ;4)15- ;;;,"0,7:79LL TER AUTHORIZATION FOR TOTAL-. - -'/x; rksvT3 E- i IDE: I_ - E-4,6 Nr, CFri irf-4 E,;-!"17). 4.4 (-77% F;Z er:11; "Ne` FL- J it 41215 E. FLORIDA AVE. HEMET, CALIFORNIA 92344 (714) 652-9333 I HAr+:KYOU FUR V1 1 (1HIS VILLA HUF>.:.; <::RIVERSIDE COUNTY-S HUtIBER ONE;>:=:>: i0HDA DEALER FOR FARTS DEPARTMENT»::- CU' T0MER SATISFACTION;>;>:%>::'>>:>::>: NO REFUND WI Irr10UT THIS INVOICE. 20"c HANDLING C TARGE ON AI L PETJR :'SJ ?' HIS PARTS r:CT RETL 4v?.9LE AFTER IC CAYS RETURNS ON ELEC-...0 AL OR SFECiAt. EC. TERMS: STRICTLY CASH UNLESS ARRAt G_6'E: TS I A4c +r,0E , PARTS DEFT. HOURS MONDAY - FRIDAY 8:00 A.M. TO 6:30 P.M. SATURDAY 8:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. WE ACCEPT VISA at MASTERCARD • UNOCAL 76 CHECKS GLADLY ACCEPTED WITH CHECK GUARANTEE CARD & DRIVERS LICENSE STOMER NO. Y TAX EXEMPT NUMBER GUST. P.O. NO. SHIP VIA PAY SOLD BY • RETAIL CASH L L T O OUANTITY.T"' HIP PART NUMBER / DESCRIPTION Llt e ANUFACTURERS REPLACEMENT PARTS AND ACCESSORIES WARRANTIES LIMITED WARRANTY • PARTS & ACCESSORIES warranties on the parts and/or accessories sold hereby are those made by the manufacturer. The seller, .A HONDA, hereby expressly disclaims all warranties, either express or implied, including all implied :anties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose, and VILLA HONDA neither assumes nor Iorizes any other person to assume for it any liability in •connection with the sale of these parts and/or 3550r1e5. t:t s distributed by American Honda and purchased from and installed by an authorized Honda Automobile dealer warranted for 12 months or 12.000 miles from the installation date, whichever comes first. Parts purchased I but not installed by an authorized Honda automobile dealer are covered for 12 months from the purchase itionalty, parts that were sold and installed by an authorized Honda Automobile dealer will be repaired or aced, at American Honda's option, without charge for parts or labor. II installed by anyone else, the labor will be reimbursed. r FINANCE CHARGE is computed by a single periodic rate of 1 Y% per month (minimum charge of .50 cents) :h is an ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE OF 18%. L:HEL:K Lih:tl_ s P T 0 SUB -TOTAL TAX A I SC FREIGHT PAY THIS AMOUNT 1 (aPouczzc INVOICE DATE INVOICE NO. 10/2Y/ 0 7.1Uj:3 HOR 197.68 13 1.- 0.00 0.00 211e0•3 • may: _ iW oc UT4E-- ARR1--VCR q- 'lJ) pe G7-eD / Cy-2cA- _ _ Fo.1 Lycra HDLES D Fv r ic T76_ __ As P, L) rue_ c 1 E of AwAte4)o/J b/e._ Pi OZTJ: -t, �' (-AV OLD lvr�, , /iris Gv2 -.3 ecuo _f%v Po 5, LeAs 544377- COX, COX & CAMPER IHOMAS M. COX DAMES A.COX BEVERLY M. CAMPER Nancy Randolph City of San Jacinto P.O. Box 488 San Jacinto, CA 92383 Dear Nancy, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 80S EAST FLORIDA AVENUE HEMET, CALIFORNIA 92343 November 16 „ 1990 City Managers Office NOV 191990 RECEIVED TELEPHONE AREA CODE 714- 652-1400 FAX (714) 652-3990 Re: Claim of James Vehawn 10/29/90 Tort Claim Rec'd 11/6/90 I spoke with Mel 0choa at the City yard with regard to this claim. Fle says that he investigated this matter and found no pot holes in the road way where this is claimed to have occurred. He speculated that the claimant may have run off the shoulder of the road, if any damage really did occur. He saw no way that two tires could have been blown as claimed by the claimant. Based on this, I would recommend that the claim be denied. Thanks. Jim Cox CITY OF SAN JACINTO TREASURER'S OFFICE TIME DEPOSIT REGISTER Bank & Acct. No. Issued Maturity Rate Amt, Inv. Int. this Mo. State of California 0833794 02-20-85 Open 8,333 3,200,000. Bed, 5133I20 01~19-88 Open 8,517 1/100/000. Great Western 389-600I53-8 II-05-90 01-04-91 7.900 50,000, 43.89 ]89~602847~] 09-2I-90 12-20-90 8.I00 500,000. 389-606357-9 11-06-90 01-07-91 7,900 700,000. 763.19 Far West Savings 0I3-10432-8 10-I6-90 0I-I5-9I 8.400 98/000. 686.00 Bed. 0I3-140I6-5 I0-I6-90 0I-I5-9I 8.400 98,000. 686.00 013-16289~5 10-30~90 01-29-91 8.400 981000. 708.87 Home Savings I07-022764-8 10-08-00 0I-08-9I 7,800 300,000, I,950.00 Red. I07-0249I6-2 I0-I5-90 0I-I3-91 7,800 5001000. 5,305.80 Total Invested $6,644/000 $ I0,043.75 November I990 Register Federal I.D. No. 05~6000780 CITY OF SAN JACINTO TREASURER'S OFFICE TIME DEPOSIT REGISTER CIVIC CENTER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT BONDS Bank & Acct. No. Issued Great Western Bank 389-603896-9 10-09-90 389-603897-7 1I-05-90 389-607952-6 10-17-90 Home Savings I07-022762-2 11-27^90 I07-022769-7 1I-13-90 November 1990 Register Federal Z.D. No. 95-6000780 Maturity Rate 01-26-9I 7-700 Amt. Zon. I/2O0/O0O, 1,420,000. 50,000. IO0/000- OI-I2-9I 7.750 1/300/000. Int. This Mo, 1,246.44 563.34 7,843.26 Total Invested $3,970,000. $ 9,652.04 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor/Members of the City Council FROM: ParnU . Easter 11 DATE: November_ 30, 1990 SUBJECT: Resolution for Adoption No. 1920 General Municipal Election Results Attached is a copy of Resolution No. 1920, for the City of San Jacinto, California, reciting the fact of the General Municipal election held on November 6, 1990, and providing the results. For your information, we have also attached the results of the Canvass of Election Returns sent to us by the County Registrar of Voters. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 1920 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION 1920 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNIC'II'AI. ELECTION HELD IN SAID CITY ON NOVEMBER 6, 1090, DECLARING THE RESULT THEREOF AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS ARE PROVIDED BY LAW WHEREAS, ., relo bo' gcnerai nnuiicipal election was held and conducted in the City of San Jacinto, California, on Tuesday, November 6, 1990 as required by law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 1897, adopted the 3rd day of July 1990, the election was consolidated with any other election being held in the some territory with the same voters and to be held on the same date, and the Registrar of Voters canvassed the returns of said election and has certified the results to this City Council, said results are received, attached and made a part hereof as Exhibit 'A"; and WHEREAS, notice of said election was duly and regularly given in time, form and manner as provided by law; and that in all respects said election was held and conducted and the votes cast thereat, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California. NOW, 'THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That there were thirteen voting precincts established for the purpose of holding said election consisting of the regular election pricincts in said City as established for the holding of State and County elections. Section 2. That said regular general municipal election was held for the purpose of electing the following officers of said City as required by laws relating to cities in the State of California to wit: a. 3 members of the City Council of said City for a term of 4 years b. 1 City Clerk of said City for a term of 4 years c. 1 City Treasurer of said City for a term of 4 years Section 3. That the whole number of votes cast in said City was 3,826 Section 4. That the names of persons voted for at said election for members of the City Council of said City are as follows: Trammell Ford Janet Leahy Dale W. Reaser Arthur T. Sheppard Henry C. Hafliger Marcelo Olivas Lester F. Redding 1 2 4 6 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Section 5. That the name of the person voted for et said election tor City Clerk of said City is as follows: Maurice D. Arms Section 6. That the name of the person voted for at said election for City Treasurer of said City is as follows: that Ken ter=hy Section 7. The City Council does declare and determine Henry C. Hafliger was elected as a Member of the City Council of said City tor the full term of four years. Janet Leahy was elected as a Member of the City Council of said City for the full term of four years. Trammell Ford was elected as a Member of the City Council of said City for the full tern of four years. Maurice D. Armster was elected as City Clerk of said City for the full term of four years. Ken Leahy was elected as City Treasurer of said City for the full term of four years. Section 8. The City Clerk shall enter on the records of the City Council of said City a statement of the result of said election showing: (1) The whole number of votes cast in the City; (2) The names of the persons voted for; (3) The measures voted upon; (4) For what office each person was voted for; (5) The number of votes given at each precinct to each person, and for and against each measure. (6) The number of votes given in the City to each person, and for and against each measure. Section 9. That the City Clerk shall immediately make and deliver to each of such persons so elected a Certificate of Election signed by the City Clerk and duly authenticated; that the City Clerk shall also administer to each person elected the Oath of Office prescribed in the State Constitution of the State of California and shall have them subscribe thereto and file the same in the office of the City Clerk. Whereupon, each and all of said persons so elected shall be inducted into the respective office to which they have been elected. 1 2 3 4 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Section 10. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original Resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. 1990. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on the 4th day of December ATTEST: Deputy City Cler CERTIFICATE The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution 1920 duly adopted by the said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein. Deputy City Clerk 11/21/90 442 GENERAL CONSOLIDATED ELECTION. NOVEMBER 6, 1990 53 049GRAND TOTALS CITY OF SAN JACINTO MBR CITY COUNCIL, CITY CLERK E TREASURER 0 5 S F A CA M N IN U5 1 RA J YJ N CA A C IC TC IJ A TA H R L YN A EN T U AT CN T R A U r 0 LO I UO R B DT R Y R R E A E C R E A UO A G L N MC E T R E N E E I L C M J L F - D - K 0 I E A H 0 S w E R S U - L N F 0 E E R I R 1 N A R L L L P D E T M 1 L 1 C N C F E 1 I P U A Y 5 Y E I A 0 I- 0 A 0 V A I 5 - T - A 0 S U T3 R 11 E A R N E OL F 01 H N 1 1 Y- D Y R S 0 G R F- R F- Y RIVERSIDE COUNTY 6387 3826 59.9 1486 1524 1672 1249 1104 1036 1170 2662 2690 371H CONGRESSIONAL 0151 63117 3826 59.9 1486 1524 1672 1249 1104 1036 1170 2662 2680 36TH SENATORIAL DIST 6387 3826 59.9 1486 1524 1672 1249 1104 1036 1170 2662 2680 73RD ASSEMBLY DIST 6387 3826 59.9 1406 1524 1672 1249 1104 1036 1170 2662 2680 3RD SUPERVISORIAL DIST 6387 3826 59.9 1486 1524 1672 1249 1104 1036 1170 2662 2680 SAN JACINTO 6387 3826 59.9 1486 1524 1672 1249 110A 1036 1170 2662 2680 11/21/90 44 GENERAL CONSOLIDATED ELECTION, NOVEMBER 6, 1990 53 OAPABSENTEF TOTALS CITY DF SAN JACINTO NPR CITY COUNCIL, CITY CLERK L TREASURER 0 S 5 F A CA M N IN BS T RA J YJ C N CA A IC TC IJ A 11 M R1 TA H R L YN A EN YC E T E CO R 50 I N M H 5 CN T R A U T 0 L 1 U R 8 OT R Y R R E A E C R L R G L NO M C E T R E K F E 1 L C M J L F - 0 - K S 0 1 E A H 0 5 R E T T T L L N 4 H R R S U - L F 0 E E R I R 1 A A R L L L P 0 E T M T L T C N C F E I I P 0 A Y 5 Y E I 4 0 1- 0 A , G V A 1 S- T - A 0 5 U T3 R H E A R N E 01 E 01 P N T T Y- 0 Y R 5 0 G R F- R F- Y RIVERSIDE COUNTY 6387 911 14.3 362 372 361 289 301 244 312 661 656 37TH CONGRESSIONAL DIST 6387 911 -14.3 362 372 361 289 301 244 312 661 656 36TH SENATORIAL DIST 6387 911 14.3 362 372 361 289 301 244 312 661 656 73RD ASSEMBLY DIST 6387 911 14.3 362 372 361 289 301 244 312 661 656 3R0 SUPERVISORIAL DIST 6387 911 14.3 362 372 361 289 301 244 312 661 656 SAN JACINTO 6387 911 14.3 362 372 361 289 301 244 312 661 656 11/21/90 44ti GENERAL CONSOLIDATED ELECTION. NOVEMBFR 6. 1990 53 CITY OF SAN JACINTO MBR CITY COUNCIL. CITY CLERK 6 TREASURER 0 S 5 F A CA M N IN BS 1 RA J YJ N CA A IC TC IJ A TI M RI TA H k L YN A EN YC E T E T U AT I N M H 5 CO R 50 CN T R A U T 0 L 1 U R B OT R Y R R E A E C R E A Un A C R L R F E G L N M C E T E K R I L C M J L F - 0 - K E T T T L L N A 0 H R N C A C N R 5 U - L F U E E R I R I A R L L L P 0 E T M T L T C N C F E I I P 0 A Y 5 Y E I A 0 I- 0 A G V A 1 S - T - A 0 5 U T3 R H E A R N E GI E 01 H N T T Y- D Y k 5 D G R F- R F- Y 602-VOT PCT 0000602 843 347 51.2 137 123 172 111 108 88 94 232 228 603-VOT PCT 0000603 959 447 46.6 171 195 173 156 141 1C7 154 329 329 604-VOT PCT 0000604 493 196 39.8 54 96 91 90 54 28 64 135 135 605-VOT PCT 0000605 808 306 37.9 102 117 125 137 P3 78 85 209 216 606-VOT PCT 0000606 619 248 40.1 88 87 124 104 69 44 75 1553 186 607-VOT PCT 0000607 805 362 45.0 146 ,138 150 108 119 86 116 240 240 608-VOT PCT 0000608 649 264 40.7 114 84 138 67 58 73 70 171 174 609-VOT PCT 0000609 583 276 56.6 99 111 114 8h 65 34 72 19L 2C2 610-VOT PC 0000610 296 174 58.8 69 71 88 51 43 51 53 121 124 611-VOT PCT 0000611 321 215 67.0 111 99 111 30 51 117 50 141 145 1115-VUT PCT 0001115 45 35 77.8 13 7 8 13 13 23 7 26 21 1116-V0T PCT 0001116 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 1117-VDT PCT 0001117 61 45 73.8 20 24 17 9 9 13 18 23 24 ABSENTEE TOTALS 6387 911 14.3 362 372 361 289 301 244 312 661 656 GRAND TOTALS 6387 3826 59.9 1486 1524 1672 1249 1104 1036 1170 2662 2680 CITY COUNCIL MEETING DA I B: SUBJECT: DESCRIPTION PLANNING COMMISSION TRANSMITTAL TO CITY COUNCIL December 4, 1990 VESTING TENTATIVE I'RACI 26246, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 1-90, AND VARIANCE 7-90 APPLICANT: KHALOGHLI AND ASSOCIATES 19800 MacArthur Boulevard Irvine, CA 92715 (714) 476-0320 LOCATION: Northeast corner of Cottonwood Avenue and Kirby Street A proposal to subdivide approximately 104.1 acres into 436 lots generally located on the northeast corner of Cottonwood Avenue and Kirby Street. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt Ordinance 922 amending the zoning map of the City including Vesting Tentative Tract 26246 as the development plan for PUD 1-90, ratify Variance 7-90 and grant Negative Declarations on all cases. STAFF COMMENTS: At the City Council meeting of November 6, 1990, the Council continued this case because of school issues and because of questions related to the dead end water lines. The developer has met with the school district and the City and has indicated a willingness to sign a pre -development agreement detailing how to mitigate the impacts of this development on the schools. Staff is supportive of this basic concept. Our contacts with EMWD indicate that their water quality serving the San Jacinto area is very similar to the City's. They also chemically treat their water to reduce the discoloration of water caused by the maganese in the water. EMWD does allow dead end lines with flusher assemblies to allow them to flush impurities from the line when necessary. The Northwest area conceptual specific plan as proposed by staff, designates this area for a public park. The development proposes two open areas which might be designated as public park space. Staff recommends Environmental Condition #3 to be amended to read as follows: 3. Lots 431, 432, and 436 shall be offered to the City in dedication for park purposes. Should the City accept the dedication of any or all of the lots, the developer shall fully improve the lots to public park standards, as dictated by the City. Should the City not accept some or all of lots 431, 432, and 436, the developer shall improve the lots in substantial conformance with the approved development plan for PUD 1-90 and the developer shall pay the City park fees in effect at the time of permit issuance. Said private lots shall be maintained by a homeowners association. page 2 MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: November 2, 1990 SUBJ: Vesting Tentative Tract 26246, Planned Unit Development 1-90, and Variance 7-90 APPLICANT: KHALOGHLI AND ASSOCIATES 19800 MacArthur Boulevard Irvine, CA 92715 (714) 476-0320 LOCATION: Northeast corner of Cottonwood Avenue and Kirby Street As you recall, Resolution 1906 which created the Temporary Open Space Designation through GPA 5-90, also allowed the processing of maps subject to compliance with the results of the Northwest Area Plan. The Northwest Area Plan has been under review and revision since August 1990 and will be before the Planning Commission in December 1990. The applicant is requesting further processing of Vesting Tentative Tract 26246, PUD 1-90, and Variance 7-90 with the understanding the project must comply with the Northwest Area Plan. Staff however, still has reservations of approving the project until the Northwest Area Plan has been completed, as several aspects of the plan have yet to be finalized. Attached are the Staff Reports for the related Vesting Tentative Tract 26246, Planned Unit Development 1-90 and Variance 7-90. The Planning Commission recommends approval subject to compliance with the Northwest Area Plan. Respectfully, 911 BRIAN MC NABS Director of Community Development MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: November 16, 1990 SUBJ: Planned Unit Development 1-90, Vesting Tentative Tract 26246 and Variance 7-90 At its hearing of November 6, 1990, the Council had concerns about school facilities and dead end water lines as they related to the subject development. As yet we have not had a response to these issues. Therefore, Staff recommends a continuance to December 4, 1990. Respectfully Submitted, BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM: lr STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development SUBJ: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 26246 DATE: October 25, 1990 APPLICANT: KHALOGHLI AND ASSOCIATES 19800 MacArthur Boulevard Irvine, CA 92715 (714) 476-0320 ENGINEER: HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES 732 E. Carnegie Drive San Bernadino, CA 92408 (714) 889-2222 DESCRIPTION A proposal to subdivide approximately 104.1 acres into 436 lots generally located on the northeast corner of Cottonwood Avenue and Kirby Avenue. EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT "B" EXHIBIT "C" EXHIBIT "D" EXHIBIT "E" EXHIBIT "F" EXHIBIT "G" ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT CURRENT USES FLOOD ZONE SEISMIC ZONE PROPOSED ZONING The environmental review identified the following impacts the project has on the City and its services. They are as follows: [1] Local and regional drainage [2] Local roadways and intersections [3] Parks CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO. 1 Public safety structures and equipment Public safety staffing Noise Regional transportation construction and maintenance Increased street repair and street cleaning and support equipment School impact Need for youth centers, senior centers, and other public facilities These impacts must be discussed in greater detail in order to understand their full implications. Local drainage is that water that is generated by run off and is carried to the regional system via the streets, ditches, small open drainage channels, and storm sewers usually sized less than 36" or not a part of the regional master plan. Normally, the developer is responsible for all the cost of improvement for local drainage. The subject site is within a designated "A" flood zone. A minimum of 50 percent of the site is within either a Zone "A" of Zone "B" flood designation per Flood Insurance Rate Map 060245 1490 C dated September 30, 1938. Regional drainage is the cumulative impact of local run off. In San Jacinto, this translates into the implementation of the Regional Master Drainage Plan. Local roadways and intersection are of course, impacted by additional traffic. A lot in a single family subdivision generally averages between 7 to 9 trips per day. Added traffic creates needs for controlled intersections. The major intersections closest to a development are the ones impacted most by the traffic. As other roadway options are available, the impacts geometrically reduce. However, the cumulative impact of all development together may create a need for signalization at intersections farther away from the development first. Staff has prepared a plan that estimates where traffic signals ultimately may be placed. Funds to construct those intersections are extracted from developments as the assumption is the signal is not needed if further development did not occur. Tract 26246 will generate approximately 3,052 to 3,924 trips per day. The streets receiving the greatest amount of this traffic will be Sanderson Avenue, Cottonwood Avenue, Kirby Avenue and Lyon Avenue. The mitigation fee for traffic signalization is currently $150.00 per unit, to be paid at the time of permit issuance unless there is an immediate need, at the time of map recordation, to signalize any of the intersections noted above. CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO. 2 Parks are impacted by residential development. The General Plan lists a need of 3 acres of public park per 1000 people. The Subdivision Map Act allows the collection of park fees or the requirement to dedicate and improve a park. The ideal park size for a neighborhood park is somewhere between five and seven acres, which translates into serving 1600-2300 people. Employment areas in the community also increase demands for parks. People employed within the City expect to use park facilities where they work. Tract 26246 will consist of 436 single family lots, which may not generate a need for a park by itself. Valley Wide Recreational Park is located about one and one half miles from the project. The impacts of the development on parks will be mitigated by the payment of park fees which will be used to create and equip new parks or to rehabilitate existing parks. As more development occurs, it naturally creates a need to expand public safety services. The type of development determines the impact on public services. Typically, police service is impacted to a greater extent than fire service, which is not to minimize fire service impacts. For example, a family apartment project creates more calls for police service than a single family subdivision. This can create an immediate need for an increase in staffing, depending on the size of the project. The increase in number of units creates more potential for fire calls but usually doesn't necessitate the need for increased personnel. A larger measure of impact on fire service is response time. In any case, more personnel creates a direct need to have equipment for that personnel. The staffing level San Jacinto is attempting to maintain is 2.5 non supervisorial police per 1000 people. The average cost of police personnel and equipment in 1988 was approximately 37.00 per person per year, for non- supervisorial personnel. By extension, new development also creates a need to house additional personnel and equipment. Funding sources for the entire police budget, such as property taxes and sales tax are also the funding sources for general governmental services. In San Jacinto, the budget for the Police Department exceeds these revenue sources. The ultimate goal of the San Jacinto Fire Department is to be able to respond to all calls within 5 minutes. As development occurs, farther from the City core, the response time drops. The City currently has one fire station in the center of town. A second fire station is due to be constructed in the next year. A third potential site is being acquired for future construction. The cost of construction is currently about $250,000.00. A fire engine costs $225,000.00 to purchase and equip. Staffing for a CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO. 3 fire station also runs approximately $250,000.00 per year. The traditional funding sources for fire services are identical to those for police service. The proposed project is located approximately two miles from the Fire Station at Pico and Sixth Street. When the station is moved to the new Civic Center site on Esplanade Avenue, the distance will be about three miles from the site. This is beyond the ideal response time of five minutes, therefore, this development must participate in the financing of fire station #3. The developer shall create or join a Public Safety Mello -Roos District to mitigate impacts on public safety staffing levels. All development that induces motor vehicle usage has a negative impact on the environment. A single project creates few problems. The cumulative impacts of all development within a region, including smoke, tank discharge, auto emission, length of drive, location of business in the region, and housing availability and cost all influence the air quality. The main polluter is the motor vehicle idling in traffic. Currently, most commerce is located in Orange, Los Angeles, and parts of Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. Most of the affordable housing is located in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. Therefore, the migration of workers in the morning is westerly and vice versa in the afternoon. In this valley two things can be done to improve air quality. The most immediate method is to participate and encourage car pooling. The other, longer range solution is to move commerce to the east. There are two regional roads that pass through San Jacinto, Ramona Expressway and Sanderson Avenue. They are regional because they are used to transport people efficiently around the cities to destinations outside the valley. Neither of these streets are constructed to their ultimate and the existing roadways for each are in need of repair. While it may not be appropriate to expect a development contiguous to a regional roadway to finance total construction of the roadway, it is fair to expect that development to pay its fair share. There is approximately $4,686,400.00 of new construction needed to be performed in the City limits and $1,000,000.00 in needed maintenance. Traditional funding sources are not adequate for these improvements. The developers should pay their fair share for this work while the City must also participate on behalf of the existing population. This cost breaks down to approximately $820.00 per acre for the 11 square miles of property in the City. Additional development with its added traffic has an impact on existing streets. Residential development has more traffic originating from it. Industrial traffic generally has heavier traffic. Commercial areas attracts traffic. All of this leads to a breakdown of the streets. Development also adds more street CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO. 4 mileage to maintain. The funding sources for road maintenance are essentially the same as those for road construction. These sources don't begin to cover the road repairs needed. There are approximately 100 miles of roadway in the City that need some degree of maintenance. The estimated cost of this maintenance is $5,000,000 for the next ten years. The City will receive approximately $1,500,000 from outside sources during this time period for road maintenance. This adds up to a cost of $500.00 per acre or $52,050.00 for Tract 26246. This will pay for maintenance and road maintenance equipment to reduce the cost of the work. Schools are impacted by residential development. State law has set the maximum that can be charged for school impact mitigation for both residential and non-residential uses. Unless state law changes, the impact of development on schools is generally considered as mitigated. However, the State lags behind development in providing funds for school development. The City may require the developer to participate in a financing district to pay for schools. Residential development increases demand for public facilities such as libraries, youth centers, senior centers, etc. Some of these facilities are funded from outside sources. There are no standard funding mechanisms for these facilities. Each time a need for a new building is determined, governmental agencies scramble to find a funding source. Examples of funding sources are Community Development Block Grant entitlement funds, bond sales, and sale/lease back. The possible City public facilities that will be needed in the future, as identified by staff are a youth center, expanded senior citizens center, and police department expansion. A youth center is estimated to cost $200,000.00, an expanded senior center $10,000.00, and police department expansion unknown at this time. These estimated costs plus a figure of $250,000.00 for possible future expansion of the Police Department total $460,000.00. This translates to $65.00 per acre. The fair charge contribution of Tract 26246 for their impact on the future needed public facilities is $6,766.50. The property is within the historic range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. The site is vacant with agricultural, rural residential and some vacant areas adjacent to the site. The subject property is located within a known seismic zone. Water and sewer are available, however, extensions will be required to service the subject development. CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO. 5 DISCUSSION The subject property is currently in the County. An application for annexation has been submitted to LAFCO for approval. The existing pre -annexation General Plan for the area is Low Density Residential. The current pre -annexation zoning is R-1, Single Family. The applicant is requesting a change of zone to R-1, PUD which would allow for smaller lots. Adjacent pre -annexation General Plan designations are Low Density Residential. The adjacent zoning consists of A, Agricultural and R-1, Single Family. Areas to the south of Cottonwood and east of Lyon are not currently proposed for annexation and are zoned as A-2-10 and A-1-5. Existing adjacent uses consisting of agricultural and rural residential uses. These may be uses which are not compatible with the proposed single family residential development. Potential conflicts between existing and proposed uses may be noise, odor, insects, etc. Development pressures are occurring in as a logical progression into the vicinity of the subject site, however interim development may be exposed to the potential conflicts mentioned above. Access will be available to the site from Cottonwood Avenue, Kirby Avenue, and Lyon Avenue. The total acreage of the subject tract is 104.1 acres. If a standard 7200 square foot subdivision were proposed, approximately 416 lots could be created. However, the subject site has two constraints to allow the 416 7200 square foot lots. They are: two seismic zones and a proposed storm drain line. Exhibit "F" shows the subject site has two seismic study zones that affect the proposed tract. One of the known fault enters the tract at the entry street on Cottonwood Avenue and follows the entry street to the open space. A 50' building set backs from know faults is required. Storm drain S Line E of the Master Drainage Plan is planned to enter the tract from the south at about Lot 286. The applicant is proposing to realign the drainage line to head to the north east from the point where the line enters the tract. This will require design approval from the County Flood Control Office. The applicant is proposing to use the seismic and drainage areas as open space. CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO. 6 Design Criteria for Planned Unit Developments are: (a) The overall plan shall achieve an integrated land and building relationship. (b) Open spaces, pedestrian and vehicular circulation facilities, parking facilities, and other pertinent amenities shall be an integral part of the landscape and particular attention shall be given to the retention of natural landscape features of the site. (c) The layout of structures and other facilities shall effect a conservation in street and utility improvements. (d) Recreational areas, active and passive, shall be provided and generally dispersed throughout the development and shall be easily accessible from all dwelling units. (e) Architectural unit and harmony within the development and with the surrounding properties shall be attained. Development Standards under the Planned Unit Development ordinance are as follows: (a) Density - In any PUD Overlay District, the number of dwelling units per net acre of land shall not exceed the number of dwelling units permitted by the underlying zone except as provided in this paragraph. For the purpose of calculating the number of dwelling units permitted by the underlying zone, the following table shall be used: Zone Classification Dwelling Units Per Net Acre R-1 7.3 R-2 14.5 R-3 22.8 The number of dwelling units per net acre of land may be increased if approved by the Planning Commission, provided such increase shall not exceed the density specified in the following table: Zone Classification Allowable Increase in Density CITY COUNCIL R-1 10% - 8.0 R-2 10% - 16.0 R-3 10% - 25.1 NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO. 7 The Planning Commission, in approving the increase in density may require additional common amenities such as (but not limited to) an increase in common open space, clustering of dwelling units and a general conservation in the amount of land utilized. (b) Minimum Lot Sizes - Every lot or parcel utilized for a residential structure shall have a minimum width of twenty-four (24) feet. Each such lot shall front for a distance of not less than twenty (20) feet upon a public or private street or pedestrian access way. (c) Building Heights - Building heights of the underlying zone may be waived to allow greater flexibility within the development. Consideration shall be given to building heights in relation to adjacent property and building inter -relationship within the development. (d) Yards - The following front, side, and rear yards shall be shown on the development plan and maintained: 1. Front - There shall be an average front yard of twenty-five (25) feet but not less than fifteen (15) feet for any building measured from the curb line of private streets and from the property line for dedicated streets. A maximum six (6) foot high wall or fence may be placed within any front yard setback, provided such wall or fence is set back five (5) feet from the right-of-way line of dedicated streets or ten (10) feet from the curb line of private streets. Such setback area shall be landscaped. 2. Side - There need be no side yard provided. However, each development plan will be reviewed to insure that adequate provisions are made for light and air and free pedestrian movement. 3. Rear - When the rear of a dwelling unit is adjacent to common open space and accessible thereto, a rear yard need not be provided. A minimum fifteen (15) foot rear yard shall be provided when the rear of a dwelling unit abuts adjacent private property within or exterior to the development. 4. Fire Access Ways - Each development plan shall provide adequate access ways for free movement of men and equipment to provide appropriate fire fighting capabilities. Such access ways shall be a minimum of five (5) feet in width and approved CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO. 8 by the City Fire Department. (e) Off -Street Parking - Off-street parking shall be provided for each use as prescribed in Article 15 Off - Street Parking and Loading. 1. Covered or open parking compounds may be designed as a functional part of the development. Parking compounds shall be conveniently accessible and adequately screened through the use of walls or landscaping. 2. The arrangement and access for all parking compounds or parking spaces shall conform to City of San Jacinto standards. 3. Recreational vehicle storage shall be provided with each dwelling or in a compound with spaces equal to one (1) for each ten (10) dwellings. 4. There shall also be required for visitors and guests, at least one (1) parking space for every dwelling unit in the development. Such parking spaces may be uncovered and shall be so located as to be accessible to such visitors and guests. On - street parking may be used to satisfy this requirement when located within 250 feet of the units generating the need. Lots 283, 27, and 231 are shown to have a rear yard setback of less than 15 feet as required by the PUD ordinance. These problems have been corrected by the applicant and will meet required setbacks. The proposed visitors parking lot does not show the number of parking spaces it will provide nor is it conveniently located. A recreational vehicle storage area is not shown on the plans. The applicant has applied for a variance to the required recreation vehicle storage as Variance 7-90. Variances have been allowed for visitors parking and recreational vehicle parking for other PUD developments within the City. The City is proposing a bicycle lane along Cottonwood Avenue terminating at a location where the seismic zone crosses Cottonwood Avenue. The bicycle path then continues northerly onto the open space. The City of Hemet has an existing Type I bicycle path along Lyon Avenue to Menlo Avenue. It is conceivable that the bicycle path will continue north to the City limits. CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO. 9 RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission approved Vesting Tentative Tract 26246 and recommends the City Council review Vesting Tentative Tract 26246 in considering approval of Planned Unit Development 1-90 and Variance 1-90. / 31)14''%?/11./../ Brian McNabb Director of Community Development CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO. 10 FINDINGS OF FACT TRACT 26246 1. Water and sewer are available, however, extensions will be required to service the subject development. 2. Tract 26246 is located within a known seismic zone. 3. Tract 26246 is located within a known "A" Flood Zone. 4. The subject site is within the habitat range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. 5. Tract 26246 will generate approximately 3,052 to 3,924 vehicular trips per day. 6. The existing General Plan is Low Density Residential. The existing zoning is R-1, Single Family Residential. 7. The proposed lots conform to the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 8. The proposed subdivision will add to the congestion of existing streets and roadways. 9. The proposed subdivision will create additional demand for parks and recreational facilities as well as impact existing facilities. 10. Public safety services will be impacted by the proposed development. 11. Negative impacts on air quality will be created by additional traffic and other cumulative impacts of development. 12. Schools are impacted by commercial, industrial and residential developments. 13. Public facilities will be impacted by the proposed development as well as a potential need for new facilities. 14. The proposed development will add to the breakdown of existing roads and streets. 15. Some noise impacts such as an increase in noise levels will result from the proposed development. 16. Two seismic zones cross the subject site. 17. The proposed Line "E" of the Master Drainage Plan intersects the subject site. CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO. 11 18. Cottonwood Avenue is designated as 110' major highway. 19. Lyon Avenue is designated as an 88' secondary highway. 16. The subject property is pending annexation into the City of San Jacinto within Annexation #65. CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO. 12 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TRACT 26246 FIRE DEPARTMENT INCORPORATE HEREIN THE FIRE DEPARTMENTS CHECKLIST DATED JUNE 20, 1990 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 1. Prior to recordation of the final map, the City shall assign one of the following conditions the applicant shall comply with. a) Pay storm drain fee in effect at time of map recordation. (currently $5,990/acre) b) Join a flood control drainage district 2. Pay traffic signal mitigation fees in effect at time of building permit issuance (currently $150.00 per unit). 3. Pay park fee in effect at time of building permit issuance (currently $.10/sq.ft. of living area). 4. Pay regional and local roadway mitigation fee in effect at the time of building permit issuance (currently $820/acre and $500/acre respectively). 5. Pay car pool mitigation fee in effect at the time of building permit issuance (currently $90.00 per unit). 6. Pay all school fees and participate as required by City in an assessment district to finance school facilities. 7. Annex to C.F.D. #3 to mitigate impacts on public safety. 8. Pay public building mitigation fee (currently $65/acre). 9. Pay fee in effect at time of permit issuance to construct fire station #3 (currently $150.00 per unit). PUBLIC WORKS 1. Marbelite street light poles shall be required on City system. 2. Street trees shall be purchased from the City for planting in public right of way. Street trees shall be planted with approved root barriers when sidewalks, curbs, walls or other improvements are located within 15'. CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO. 13 3. A landscape plan shall be submitted for approval, using a water conserving irrigation systems (Rainbird MaxiCom System). 4. All lots shall be connected to the sewer system. 5. Construct handicapped ramps per City standards. 6. Construct a 5 1/2' sidewalk per City standards. 7. Provide matching street paving. 8. Install curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Curb face shall be determined by hydrology study. 9. Submit signing and striping plan. 10. Install a Type I bicycle path in the green belt areas as designated by the City. 11. Install a Type I bicycle path from the east boundary on Cottonwood Avenue and into the entry street into the development. 12. Install a Type II bicycle path along Lyon Street. 13. Provide traffic study and comply with recommendations of approved study. 14. All streets shall be constructed to City Public Work Standards. Existing streets shall be reconstructed to centerline. Pavement width within the subdivision shall be 40' curb to curb as required by City standards. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Submit typical landscape and automatic watering system plans. All front yards shall have landscaping. 2. A perimeter decorative wall shall be required around the subdivision. The project shall comply with the City's fencing regulations at time of building permits issuance. 3. Developer shall join or establish a Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District. 4. All applicable development fees effective at the time of the issuance of the building permits shall be paid. 5. All new and existing utilities shall be underground. CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO. 14 6. Final grading, parking, paving and landscaping plans shall be submitted for approval. 8. Black address numbers on white florescent background shall be painted on the curb. Numbers shall be a minimum 4 inches in height. 9. Consult with the San Jacinto Post Office regarding the type and placement of the mail boxes. 10. Grading and public improvements shall be installed in accordance with City standards and specifications. 11. Submit a hydrology study for the subject site. 12. Parcels that occur on cul de sacs and knuckles shall have a building set back at a line tangent to the street and 60' from side property line to side property line. 13. Cul de sacs shall not exceed 600' in length. Measurement shall be from the center line of the cross street to the end of the cul de sac. 14. Submit a soils report. 15. Flood zone permit required. 16. All roof mounted appliances shall be screened from public view. 17. Provide 11" x 17" footprint map of all homes within the proposed subdivision for addressing. 18. All design and development standards as required in the PUD Ordinance shall be met. 19. Notwidthstanding this development as submitted, final design of the PUD & tract map shall be in accordance with the conceptual specific plan for the Northwest Area Plan. POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. All required traffic signs shall be installed with the approval of the traffic engineer. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATING MONITORING 1. Developer shall provide a Declaration stating how all significant environmental concerns will be mitigated, prior to the recordation of a final map. CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO. 15 2. Upon the approval of the Declaration, it shall be noticed on the Final Map and recorded simultaneously. 3. Upon the start of construction, at six month intervals, and prior to occupancy the developer shall provide a status report relating to compliance with the mitigating measures. 4. Prior to occupancy, the City shall verify compliance with the mitigating measures. CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO. 16 FIRE DEPARTMENT _ 180 WEST SIXTH STREET • SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA 92383. • 714 - 654-2702 FIRE'PREVENTION BUREAU CHECKLIST APPLICANT: KWALOGHL1 HUD 11550(1ETES SITE PLAN # 77-0 MEETING DATE: (TUNE 2(3 1790 1) PERMITS REQUIRED BY SEUTION 4.108 2) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD SHALL BE PROVIDED AND MAINTAINED. SECTION 10.207. WIDTH SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 20 FEET. VERTICAL CLEARANCE UNOBSTRUCTED VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF NOT LESS THAN 13 FEET, 6 INCHES. SURFACF OF ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND MAINTAINED TO Sk1' THE IMPOSED LOADS OF FIRE APPARATUS AND SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A SURFACE SO AS TO PROVIDE ALL-WEATHER DRIVING CAPABILITIES. ( t4 3) ROADS IN EXCESS OF 150 FEET IN LaNGTH SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH APPROVED PROVISIONS FOR THE TURNING AROUND OF FIRE APPARATUS. ( Apl 4) PRWIDE PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AS DESIGNATED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND NFPA, SELTION 10.303. 5) PROVIDE AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSfER PER CITY REQUIREMENTS_ SELJION 10.306. 6) FULL FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED 7,1 ACCEPTED RE THE COMMENCEMENT OF FRAMING. (Fine iirg4- 4,1 7) PROVIDE FIRE DEPARTMENT WITH A SCALE MAP OF PROJECT. (8-1/2 X 11") ( 8) KEY BOX - SECTION 10.209. KEY BOX SHALL BE A TYPE APPROVED BY THE FIRE CHIEF AND SHALL CONTAIN KEYS, MAP 20 SCALE, HAZARDOUS MATERIAL LIST. ( 4 9) FIRE FLOWS SHALL BE /ALSO GALLONS PER MINUTE AT 20 PSI RESIDUAL. OPERATING PRESSURE MUST RP AVAILABLE BEFORE ANY COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL IS PLACED ON THE JOB SITE. ( WM- 10) INSTALL A SUPER FIRE HYDRANT (JAMES JONES J-3765 6" x 2-2-1/2" x 1-4") WITHIN FEET OF ALL PARTS OF THE BUILDING AS DESIGNATED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. ( t/c 11) FIRE HYDRANT SPACING IS EVERY 590 tEEI AS LOCATED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. IN • FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU CBECRLIST PAGE #2 ( 12) ( 13) UPGRADE THE NEAREST HYDRANT TO A SUPER. HYDRANT. ( VZ) 14) HYDRANTS VD BE PAINTED W/REFLECTIVE SODTCHLITE S-368 AND BLUE DOT CW PAVEMENT VD INDICATE FIRE HYDRANT. ( glAt) 15) A COMMERCIAL HOOD SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ThT KI1CHEN ( 16) HOUR FIRE WALLS TO BE INSTALLED, DIVIDING THE BUILDING INTO b i1ONS OF MORE THAN SQUARE EhLi. ( A01 17) IF A FULL MANSARD IS CCNSIRUCTED, PROVIDE A LADDER TD ROOF DECK. (A/)fr) 18) TRASH BINS MUST HAVE A DROP LID. FOR OXYGEN SUPPLY REFILL DEVICE. - .25 PLR SQ. FT. RESIDENTIAL- $10.00 PER. BED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE DEVELOPER SHALL DEPOSIT WITH TRF SAN JACINTO FIRE DFPARTMENT, THE SUM OF FOR THE REETTI, DEVICE. ( 41 20) SAYS TO BE CONSTRUCTED - 4' MINIMUM. 21) STANDPIPES ON THE ROOF ARE REQUIRED. ( 22) INSTALL A WALT( OR DRIVE -THROUGH WITH DOCK BOX. (tf74 23) r.LRL LANES SHALL BE DESIGNATED IN THE FOLLU4ING LOCATION(S) RELOCATE FIRE HYDRANTS 'TO 24) THE LANE SEAT, RP SIGNED IN ACCORCIAMIE WITH CITY & SEkth REGULATION ( ) 25) A SDOOND EZILRLOY EXIT SHALL BE PROV_DM. ( t/r- 26) ADDRESS ON THE BUILDING SHALL BE A MININUMOF 0- INCHES IN HEIGHT AND POSTED ON A CaNTRASTING BACKGROUND. )4, 27) "NO PARKING' SIaNS SHALL BE POSTED IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATION(S) 28) POST "NOT A THROUGH STREET" SIGN AT ENTRANCES. IGATION FOR FIRE PROTECTION IMPACT. $400.03 PER UNIT. ARTMENT OR RESIDENcF UP TO 1800 SQ. FT. 25 PER SQ. FT. FOR ALL crYsIERCIAL BUILDINGS. = Rural Residential / Ag/icultural �Iz /C(Dmmunity |' I 136 Commercial --. Cottonwood Connunity _ � Commercial Low Density Residential S=`'enz� ~" ^ � al � Rural Residential Low Dens tv - Avenue- -----4`1 ~~ Stre�t �XHIDlT EXISTING �EN���L PL�� VESTING TENTA-IVE TRACT 26246 C2) -~ ^ � C-2 General Commercial . Cottonwood C-', General Commercial Seventh /36 ).. !Fit v. 4..w.et a+ v Agricultural Single Family VGnLIe- - R--1. Single Family r.4 EXHIBIT 'T" t EXISTING <R-Ei'.J'.f.l VESTING TENTAT l l H 1 VE TRACT __L4 S Lr4Y. F.-T ) � o ` Cottonwood -1 .. nUE? - �� �. . 110��Major ^� T� ---_—_— -~ Seconda'-y R�uadway EKHIBIT EXIS�ING CIRCULATION ELEMEN� VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 26246 � � �cz � 0 ~ � � � � / ^ Rural Residential / Vacant Cottonwood r Rural Residential Vacant /acant VacantVacant `�Residence^� EXHIBIT 'D" CUR�ENT USES yESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 262�6 Avenu , JOINS PANEL 147 -i..i.ii...UNE- VE!..7.;!iNC7, L.J1':--IiiVE Ti-'!OGT 26-.1::46 EXHIBIT "F" SEIEMIn ZONE VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 26246 L. ` Cottonwood -It ^- _ � ^ | � ~ ~ - � � � ri ` r 7 , , I �--1 . w-W 1 T ^ � r ' Sevench I E�HIBIT 'G'' PROPGSE� ZQNING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 26246 � St/et--t r- ` � , � ` r .W " `, STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: July 23, 1989 SUBJ: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 1-90 APPLICANT: KHALOGHLI AND ASSOCIATES 19800 MacArthur Boulevard Irvine, CA 92715 (714) 476-0320 ENGINEER: HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES 732 E. Carnegie Drive San Bernadino, CA 92408 (714) 889-2222 EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT "B" EXHIBIT "C" EXHIBIT "D" EXHIBIT "E" EXHIBIT "F" EXHIBIT "G" ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT CURRENT USES FLOOD ZONE SEISMIC ZONE PROPOSED ZONING The zoning of this property was changed from A, Agricultural to R-1, Single Family in late 1989 in preparation for annexation to the City of San Jacinto. This requested PUD designation is in accordance with the R-1 zone with a higher density (6.4 units per acre) than a subdivision with minimum lot size (3.2 - 4.2 units per acre). CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO 1 The environmental issues that effect this property the most are the "A" flood zone and a special studies seismic zone. These are outlined in exhibits E and F. Development must mitigate these impacts in accordance with State law and local regulation. As a negative declaration was granted for the earlier zone change, so a negative declaration should be granted in this case. A more detailed environmental analysis will be provided related specifically to Tract 26246, the proposed development for the property. DISCUSSION The purposes of the Planned Unit Development Overlay Districts are to encourage desireable living environments, efficient use of land, common area, preservation of natural slopes and other natural features, and encourage compatibility with established residential areas. The Planning Commission and City Council should determine whether the intent and purposes of the PUD Overlay District are being met in this particular case. The following are design criteria within a PUD: A. The overall plan shall achieve an integrated land and building relationship. b. Open spaces, pedestrian and vehicular circulation facilities, parking facilities, and other pertinent amenities shall be an integral part of the landscape and particular attention shall be given to the retention of natural landscape features of the site. C. The layout of structures and other facilities shall effect a conservation in street and utility improvements. D. Recreational areas, active and passive, shall be provided and generally dispersed throughout the development and shall be easily accessible from all dwelling units. E Architectural unit and harmony within the development and with the surrounding properties shall be obtained. The basis for the request for a PUD overlay is due to accommodation of seismic and flood areas and the provision of open space. The Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed PUD against the appropriate City regulations and found it to be in substantial conformance. An undefined recreational area is required by the ordinance. The developer is proposing a bike path and jogging CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO 2 course. Staff believes this development is being marketed toward families. The average front yard setback is required to be a minimum 25 feet but not less than 15 feet for any building measured from the curb line of private streets and from property line for dedicated streets. No side yards is required. However, adequate provisions are required for light and air and free pedestrian movement. A minimum 15 foot rear yard setback is required when the rear yard abuts an adjacent private property within or exterior to the development. The PUD Ordinance requires the total ground coverage of the entire development (not individual lot) not to exceed 60%. A two car garage is required as prescribed in the City's Zoning Ordinance 340, Article 15. The ordinance requires one R.V. parking space per ten units. Traditionally this has not been required if the Conditions Covenants and Restrictions specifically ban their parking in the development. The ordinance also requires a two car garage as well as one guest space per unit. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission approved PUD 1-90 subject to receiving a Variance regarding RV parking and City Council approval. BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO 3 54N JACINTO AFIaVOi . (mwO) Wad ritE ionsing 7 pllROlh_ ' - N9w.d . i Aexac/N® we.•ak armAra JEPMEY AVENUE NEM* MMV..MMMIY_ YAM Lrid4 999 .0. Kfma l roam WM tat..n e.ronu uN e.ono mw9 1. FAIT . 4.a11....sm Gs i.9wTLAy931119 19."��i wnlinc fl3J `03 MINK, 999p9. RAP RiSw.119.. l0 Imll® VOWC 9wn lY4rtfu ITY a a .�.....v.re aa:"a l e.N "lam'"ao w990`i.19 Il.m 3m ., Murry Walt* 999.9 COTTONWOO& AVENUE TUMBRIOGE AVENUE RESTRICTED•LOCAL STREET 1 unv B. u.Nb. p[H NI t.-i46] 9 [LL 5 3..116 N{[ I C[p[N[ fEES[C10 0! C011 O99 Vorol[ Al VON AV[NUL C AN E2110 LYON AVENUE NIRBY h JEFFREY AVENUES Ti 1 GENERAL LOCAL STREET WNLT7/OEva1.0PC0 KHALOGHLI d ASSOCIATES SUIT 122�RiNUR 80ULEVAA YE ST�Q TENTATIVE TRACT IRVIN , CA. 92715 (714) 476-0320 OFFICE MAP NO. • 1248 (714) 476-2634 F40 EXHIBIT 1 CITY OF SAN JACINTO .l 39 *obi ; 793•I 4 FINDINGS OF FACT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 1-90 1. Planned Unit Development 1-90 is located within a known flood zone. 2. Planned Unit Development 1-90 is located with a known special seismic study zone. 3. Utilities are readily available to the site with main line extensions. 4. The PUD Ordinance requires one guest parking per dwelling unit. 5. The PUD Ordinance requires an area set aside for recreational vehicle parking. 6. The subject property has a General Plan designation of low density residential. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PUD 1-90 1. The PUD Overlay District, and any Master Plan or other materials approved as a part thereof, shall become null and void if the physical development of the District is not commenced within two (2) years from date of adoption of the Resolution establishing the District. 2. Submit CC&R's to the City for approval. 3. Provide RV parking to meet PUD standards. 4. Front, side and rear yard set backs shall comply with the City's PUD Ordinance. CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 PAGE NO 4 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council DATE: October 26, 1990 SUBJ: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE 7-90 APPLICANT: KALOGHLI AND ASSOCIATES 19800 MacArthur Boulevard Irvine, CA 92715 (714) 476-0320 ENGINEER: HUNSAKER AND ASSOCIATES 732 E. Carnagie Drive San Bernardino, CA 92408 (714) 889-2222 DESCRIPTION A proposal for a Variance to dismiss required parking provisions for R.V. parking per Conditional Use Petmit requirements of the Zoning Ordinance EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT "B" EXHIBIT "C" EXHIBIT "D" EXHIBIT "E" EXHIBIT "F" EXHIBIT "G" ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT CURRENT USES FLOOD ZONE SEISMIC ZONE PROPOSED ZONING There would be no significant effect on the environment by this request. DISCUSSION The subject property is located in Tentative Tract 26246 area north of Cottonwood Avenue west of Lyon Avenue. PUD zoning applications and Tentative Tract Map 26426 were approved by the Planning Commission contingent upon a variance to R.V. parking CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 Page No. 1 requirements. The applicant is requesting a variance to the required R.V. parking provisions as required under the PUD Ordinance. Condition #3 of PUD 1-90 requires RV parking be provided. If a variance is granted, a condition should accompany the approval to disallow all R.V. parking within the subdivision and included within CC&R's. To approve the variance, the Planning Commission must make findings of fact to all of the circumstances prescribed in Ordinance 340, Article 18, Section 18.06 (B) apply. They are as follows: 1. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. 2. That strict of literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship or would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Ordinance. 3. The special circumstance do not result from the actions of the applicant; and 4. That granting the variance request will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission approved Variance 7-90 recommending the City Council ratify Variance 7-90 subject to Findings of Fact and Staff Report. BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 Page No. 2 FINDINGS OF FACT VARIANCE 7-90 1. Variance 7-90 is located within a known flood zone. 2. Variance 7-90 is located with a known special seismic study zone. 3. The strict of literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would result in a net loss of open space and security problems for RV's on the site. 4. The site configuration is a result of the actions of the applicant in the layout of the subdivision. 5. The granting the variance request will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. Exceptions to R.V. parking requirements have been granted in previous Planned Unit Developments. 6. There will be no significant affect on the environment as a result of this proposal. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VARIANCE 7-90 1. No R.V. parking shall be allowed within the area included in Tentative Tract 26426. A no R.V. parking clause shall also be included in the CC&R's of the subdivision. CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 6, 1990 Page No. 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ORDINANCE NO. 922 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 1-90 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby amended by adding thereto Planned Unit Development 1-90 as herein set forth. Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the City of San Jacinto shown on the attached map marked Exhibit "A" made a part hereof, is hereby established as R-1, PUD. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 6nd day of November 1990 by the following vote: MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 1990 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. 922 duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of 1990. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of 1990. Deputy City Clerk EXH.TPIT "A" PROPOSED 7ONTNG VEST:ERG TENTP,TIVE TRArT CITY OF November 28, 1990 Trammel Ford, Mayor TERRY FRIZZEL City of San Jacinto Mayor P.O. Box 488 San Jacinto, CA 92383 CALIFORNIA 92522 714/782-5551 Dear Mayor Ford: City Manager's Office DEC 3 1990 RECEIVED The State Legislature, in adopting the State's budget, also passed lori d„ counties to impose charges to cities for the cost of; boot i g prisoner aper nd' proty 'tag administrative .co5 The .Riverside County Board of.,. upervisors:-has.xset' a consider this matter on' 13edemtier 11 , 1990, at 10:00 Administrative, Center. We need to appose ..the i charges Enclosed is information that. has been Pro corcernlng;ths hearng; hearing to a.m, in the County, mposition of these ded by the, County The combination of these charges to the City of Riverside exceeds $1.1 million. Although these are the highest charges, I am sure the effect upon each of your cities is equally dramatic and damaging. Because of this extraordinary action, I feel the elected and appointed officials of cities in Riverside County should ban together to protest this unfair burden. Also enclosed is a resolution which I am asking the Riverside City Council to adopt next week. I -.would encourage each of you to take a similar action prior to December 11, and forward it to the Board of Supervisors. In addition, I am asking each of you, along with your City Council members, City Manager, Finance Director and Police Chief, to join me at the meeting on December 11 to protest the "imposition of these charges. To be effective, we all have to be at the hearing. Therefore, I hope you can take time out of your busy schedule to join the other cities in Riverside County in making our position on this issue very clear to the County Board of Supervisors. Sincerely, �y Terry Frizzel Mayor TF/6789Y/c Enclosures cc: Mayors City Managers Finance Directors Police Chiefs SISTER CITIES SENDAI, JAPAN CUAUTLA, MEXICO SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ENSENADA, MEXICO County Administrative Office November 21, 1990 Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Riverside 4080 Lemon Street - 14th Floor Riverside, California 92501 RE: SB 2557 (Maddy) Implementation. Members of the Board: Gary N. Cottrell Chief Administrative Officer Mischelle Zimmerman Assistant CAO During the 1990-91 State Budget deliberations, the Legislature and Governor approved SB 2557, Maddy (Chapter 455 of 1990). This bill provides new authorization for counties to charge cities and other local agencies for property tax administrative costs and booking fees to recover the expense of booking prisoners into the County jail. The purpose of this legislation was to partially replace sharp cuts in State funding to County programs in 1990-91. Attached are two resolutions: Resolution No. 90-651 Property Tax Costs and Resolution No. 90-650 Booking Fees which require adoption by the Board to implement SB 2557. Both resolutions are to be set for Public Hearing at 10:00 a.m. on December 11, 1990. The 1990-91 State Budget cut $16 million from Riverside County programs. The new revenue sources provided by SB 2557 would increase County revenues by approximately $8 million or half the State Budget cuts. When adopting the 1990-91 Final County Budget, this $8 million was included as estimated revenue: $2 million for booking fees and $6 million for property administration. On November 6, 1990, the Board considered protests on the implementation of SB 2557 by local agencies, schools, cities and police officials. Responding to these protests, the Board determined that the County would not bill any of the charges authorized by SB 2557 prior to March 1, 1991 except for City property tax charges which are mandated. The Board also agreed to work with cities and school districts to urge the State to provide alternative funding to counties to offset the revenues provided in SB 2557 and provide relief to other public agencies which are affected by these fees. Resolution No. 90-703 which expresses the Board's intent in this regard is also attached for the Board's approval. Robert T. Andersen Administrative Center 4080 LEMON I HEET • 12TN FLOOR • RNERS[E. CALIFORNIA 92501 •1714) 275-1100 • FAX (7141 275.1105 Property Tax Charges Pursuant to SB 2557, the County may charge all local taxing agencies for the costs of administering the County's property tax system. The charges are mandatory for cities. Resolution No. 90-651 describes the procedures for charging these costs, which are based on the actual net costs for 1989-90 of the Assessor's, Treasurer -Tax Collector and Auditor - Controller's offices and appropriate overhead costs (per Federal A-87 Cost Standards). As required, the Auditor -Controller has prepared Exhibit A to Resolution No. 90-651 which details the property tax charges to each local agency. Assuming 100% of charges are collected, 1990-91 revenue to the County would total $7.8 million. Cost allocation procedures are based on statewide standards promulgated by CSAC and the statewide association of County Administrative Officers, the Auditor's Association and the State Controller's Office. Booking Fees As proposed, Resolution No. 90-651 would implement charges to all local agencies for jail booking expenses. Sheriff, Auditor -Controller and Administrative Office staff developed the cost accounting methodology to be utilized to recover these expenses. The fee was determined to be $124.94 per booking based on actual costs and the number of jail bookings during 1989-90. Again the County followed the basic statewide methodology and guidance recommended by CSAC. One issue of concern raised by law enforcement officials, and addressed in Resolution No. 90-650, is that Riverside County will not charge for arrest warrants which originate from a law enforcement agency or City other than the arresting City's Police Department. Further, the County will not charge a City for arrests when working as a team in a multiple jurisdictional task force. Based on 1989 costs, the volume of bookings into County jails, and assuming 100% collections, the 1990-91 booking fee revenue to the County would total approximately $3 million. Attachment 1 lists the estimated annual booking fee revenue each City in Riverside County would pay in 1990-91. Potential Imps, on )unty Departments if SB 2557 Rev( s Are Not Realized Departments have been asked to review the potential impact on their operations if the County does not receive the $8 million in revenue provided by SB 2557. Some of these impacts are highlighted below: The Sheriff's budget would be reduced by 50 positions which would sharply reduce patrol and corrections staffing and therefore law enforcement and corrections services to the community. General inability of most departments to fill vacant positions. The Personnel function in Indio would be eliminated. No adult probation services would be provided by the Probation Department. Inability to fill 11 positions in Public Defender's Office. Cut -backs would occur in critically -needed hospital clinic services in Indio, ambulance services and detention health services. Many critical health, mental health and social service programs would be reduced despite mandated service levels. Copies of reports from departments on these budget impacts have been compiled and distributed to Board members. In summary, reductions in County programs for FY 1990-91 without additional State revenues to replace the SB 2557 funding would cause a major County budget crisis in 1990- 91 and future years; it would severely impact the health and safety of all citizens of Riverside County. In light of the foregoing I recommend that the Board of Supervisors take the following actions: 1. Approve Resolution Nos. 90-650, 90-651, and 90-703. 2. Schedule a Public hearing on December 11, 1990 at 10:00 a.m. to receive public testimony on Resolutions Nos. 90-650 and 90-651. 3. Direct the Administrative Office to collaborate with cities and school districts in their attempts to seek repeal or amendments to SB 2557; it being expressly understood that such efforts must include provision for compensating off -setting revenue to the County by the State. Respectfully submitted, Chief Administrative Officer Attachments ATTACHMENT 1 County of Riverside SB 2557 Booking Fees By CitY 1990-91 Estimated Booking Fee Charges City or Agency (12 Months) Riverside 778,000 Indio 434,750 Moreno Valley 341,500 Coachella 208,500 Banning 194,000 Cathedral City 169,750 Palm Springs 146,750 Lake Elsinore 141,750 Corona 127,500 Blythe 105,750 Temecula 99,750 Hemet 91,750 Beaumont 85,750 San Jacinto 77,750 Perris 56,750 Palm Desert 49,250 Desert Hot Springs 47,250 University of California-Riverside/Police 26,000 Rancho Mirage 21,000 La Quinta 14,000 Indian Wells 7,000 * NOTE: Separate Data Unavailable for Norco. EXHIBIT A RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROPERTY TAX NET ADMINISTRATION COSTS FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 DISTRICT COUNTY O1-1001 GENERAL FUND 01-1121 LIBRARY 01-1123 CCUNTY FIRE 01-1134 ROAD DISTRICT FUND 01 TOTALS DISTRICT NAME CHARGES 2,505,021 72,507 92,183 6,085 2,675,797 CITIES 02-2051 BANNING 21,255 02-2101 BEAUMONT 12,229 02-2151 BLYTHE 9,970 02-2225 CATHEDRAL CITY 18,259 02-2251 COACHELLA 3,770 02-2301 CORONA 137,032 02-2321 DES HOT SPRINGS 9,002 02-2351 LAKE ELSINORE 19,921 02-2375 LA QUINTA 5,061 02-2401 HEMET 46,777 02-2441 INDIAN WELLS 817 02-2451 INDIO 25,478 02-2490 MORENO VALLEY 39,347 02-2501 NORCO 18,072 02-2580 PALM DESERT 7,071 02-2601 PALM SPRINGS 196,966 02-2651 PERRIS 21,690 02-2681 RANCHO MIRAGE 5,366 02-2701 RIVERSIDE 208,061 02-2801 SAN JACINTO 10,478 FUND 02 TOTALS 816,621 SCHOOLS 03-0004 YUCAIPA UNIFIED SCHOOL 11,793 03-0009 SAN BERNARDINO VAL COMM COLLEGE 2,136 03-0018 COLTON,-JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL 2,186 03-0020 CHILDREN CENTER-COLTON 10 03-0024 SCHOOLS 0 03-0501 ALVORD UNIFIED SCHOOL 169,411 03-0801 BANNING UNIFIED 42,303 03-1101 BEAUMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL 54,065 03-1601 COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED 59,042 03-1622 COACHELLA UNIF CHILD CENTER 3,480 03-1701 CORONA NORCO UNIFIED SCHOOL 339,915 03-2-001 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCH 386,094 03-2030 DESERT SANDS CHILDRENS CENTER 1,232 03-2201 DESERT CENTER UNIFIED SCHOOL 8,176 03-2301 LAKE ELSINORE UNIFIED 135,252 03-3201 HEMET UNIFIED SCHOOL 239,656 03-3601 JURUPA UNIFIED SCHOOL 150,04 Page 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROPERTY TAX NET ADMINISTRATION COSTS FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT BANNING RDV BLYTHE RDV CORONA RDV LAKE ELSINORE HEMET RDV INDIO RDV PERRIS RDV p RIVERSIDE RDV "k SAN JACINTI RDV PALM SPRINGS RDV COACHELLA RDV DESERT HOT SPRINGS RDV NORCO RDV INDIAN WELLS RDV RANCHO MIRAGE RDV PALM DESERT RDV CATHEDRAL CITY RDV LA QUINTA RDV MORENO VALLEY RDV COUNTY RDV TOTAL RDV DISTRICT NAME CHARGES 6,970 3,195 107,827 45,238 20,966 28,465 20,657 174,597 10,812 71,480 19,233 13,071 31,603 128,725 163,404 257,183 63,541 118,351 52,431 52,975 1,390,723 TOTALS 10,257,013 Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE'S IMPOSITION OF FEES FOR BOOKING PRISONERS WHEREAS, the State Legislature finally balanced its budget in August by underfunding counties by $800 million and told counties to begin charging cities to book prisoners; and WHEREAS, every city in Riverside County has adopted a balanced budget for the fiscal year beginning July, 1990; and WHEREAS, if Riverside County elects to charge cities for booking prisoners, every city budget in the county will be thrown into a deficit position. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Riverside, California, does hereby urge the Riverside County Board of Supervisors to not implement the booking fees authorized by SB 2557, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City of Riverside urges the Board of Supervisors to create a Task Force of City and County Officials which would explore the County's booking process and offer possible alternatives to the current system which would reduce the overall cost of this important and necessary function. ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this day of December, 1990. Mayor of the City of Riverside Attest: City Clerk of the City of Riverside SAN JACINTO POLICE DEPARTMENT 160 West 6th Street San Jacinto, CA. 92383 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and Council Members via City Manager From: Chief of Police Date: November 28, 1990 Subject: Request for Authorization to Enter into Contract for Development of a Police Service Impact Model (PSIM) for Futures Planning Within the Police Department. The City of San Jacinto is in a growth mode unequal to anything the city has experienced before. This growth - a result of aggressive annexations, affordable and a good mix of housing, spillover from the City of Hemet and the County area and of course other factors such as quality of life which is a big plus for our city and valley area, has placed this city and each department in a highly challenging role. The challenge is basically to provide service to the city in a manner acceptable to the customer in light of shrinking budgets, too many federal, state and county mandates, rapid changes in technology and the ability to recruit and retain qualified personnel to provide these services. The proposed Police Service Impact Model (PSIM) was developed by Ralph Andersen and Associates to assist police agencies plan for the future. Specifically, the model is designed to quickly assess the impacts of growth and development on police department staffing, equipment, and facilities. Planning is a never ending cycle and any good police manager or executive is constantly reviewing processes whereby we can provide a level of service which is both efficient and cost effective. I strongly feel this "tool" will provide me the necessary flexibility to give both the council and city manager accurate and up-to-date information as to what will be required to police the City of San Jacinto. As shown in the proposal, the film who is providing the PSIM has a long history of performance and is reputable, the model is designed specifically for the San Jacinto Police Department using data from both department files and planning department files, and one of the better features is the model is also designed for Memorandum November 28, 1990 Page 2 continuous updating. This will allow for future increases in cost to be analyzed in terms of "current time" impacts, i.e., personnel contract negotiations. Since the department is currently developing our Strategic Plan, the data generated through the model will provide excellent model/plan correlation. It is therefore respectfully requested the City Manager be authorized to enter into a contract with Ralph Andersen and Associates to provide the Police Service Impact Model. Cost of the model is $22,715 and funding for the project is within the current funding capability of the police department through use of asset forfeiture money. The proposal is a single source purchase. Should the council have any questions, I am at your disposal. You will also find attached a copy of the proposal which is basically self explanatory. MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: November 30, 1990 SUBJ: REDUCTION OF SEWER PERFORMANCE BONDS FOR FRAC! 24745 Forecast Corporation has formally requested the release of sewer bonds for Tract 24745. The sewer lines for Tract 24745 are installed to a point which would be appropriate for a reduction in the sewer bonding amount. Staff therefore recommends the Perfomance Bond for Sewer in the amount of $76,544.00 be reduced to $15,000.00. Respectfully Submitted, Brian McNabb Director of Community Development let 11,0MES October 18, 1990 CITY OF SAN JACINTO 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, California 92383 Attn: Linda Jo RE: TRACT 24745 - SEWER BOND RELEASES Dear Linda: RECEIVED OC I 9 IV9t.1 Community Development Forecast Corporation hereby requests release of the following bonds. All work for the sewer system is complete and meets the conditions of approval for Tract 24745. BOND NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 200748S Sewer 200746S Sewer $ 76,544.00 $212,728.00 If you have any questions, or need further infoimation please call me at 987-7788, extension 319. Thank you. Sincerely, FOR AST CORPORATION Gail Hobbs Assistant Project Manager GH:pmc 10670 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (714) 987-77S8 fax 980-7305 MEMO TO: H able Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Pa pr-Easter SUBJ: DATE: November 30, 1990 Proposed San Jacinto Valley Transportation Study As you are aware, our City has been meeting with the City of Hemet, County of Riverside, Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), Riverside Transit Authority (RTA), CalTrans, the two Chambers, and Assemblyman Kelley's office to discuss our Valley's transportation issues, both within the Valley as well as to points outside of the Valley. Assemblyman Kelley has expressed a willingness to sponsor an Assembly Concurrent Resolution (ACR) that would request CalTrans to serve as lead agency in the development of a transportation corridor study for the Hemet/San Jacinto/Winchester area. This study would be in cooperation with WRCOG, the Cities of Hemet and San Jacinto, County of Riverside, and RCTC. It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution indicating your support of such a study. This resolution would then be transmitted to Assemblyman Kelley's office to show the City's support of his sponsored Assembly Concurent Resolution requesting CalTrans to complete the above - mentioned study. :MS 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 RESOLUTION NO. 1914 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO SUPPORTING THE CONCEPT OF A TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR STUDY FOR THE HEMET/SAN JACINTO/ WINCHESTER AREA AND TO SUPPORT THE SUBMISSION OF AN ASSEMBLY CONCURRENT RESOLUTION THAT WOULD REQUEST SAME STUDY TO BE COMPLETED BY STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WHEREAS: There is a great need for additional transpor- tation corridors in the Western Riverside County area, especially within the rapidly developing Hemet/San Jacinto Valley to main- tain local circulation and adequate regional access to the remainder of the western county and to the adjacent counties of Southern California, and WHEREAS: The State Department of Transportation is responsible for identifying and developing inter -regional corridors NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Support the concept of the State of Transportation providing oversight for, and to work cooperatively with, the Riverside County Transportation Commission, the Western Riverside Council of Governments, the cities of Hemet and San Jacinto, and the County of Riverside to conduct a study of existing and poten- tial new transportation corridors in the Hemet/San Jacinto/Winchester area generally described as Route 60 and I-10 on the north, I-215 on the south, the Ramona Expressway on the west, and the area between Hemet and Sun City on the west. 2. Support the submission of an Assembly Concurrent Resolution authorized by Assemblyman Kelley that would request the Department of Transportation to conduct such a study. 3. Support that all costs of the transportation corridor study be funded by the Riverside County Transportation Commission through the Western Riverside Council of Governments. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED on December 4, 1990 ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk CERTIFICATE The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. 1914 duly adopted by the said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein. Deputy City Clerk MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DA1E: November 29, 1990 SUBJ: REDUCTION OF BONDS FOR PARCEL MAP 25021 APPLICANT: GGP Investments LOCATION: 700 N. Idyllwild Drive The improvements for Parcel Map 25021 are substantially complete and the developer has requested release of the performance bond. Staff has reviewed the request for release of bonds and recommends only a reduction of the performance bond from $39,752.28 to $10,000.00 as the improvements have not been accepted. Respectfully Submitted, BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM:Ir October 22, 1990 Mr. Brian Mc Nabb, Director of Community Development City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, California 92382 Re: San Jacinto Associates, A Ca. Ltd. Partnership 232 West Napa Street Sonoma, California 95476 RECEIVED OCT 2 Comrnuntty ]eveioprant San Jacinto Village Apartments Idllywild Drive, San Jacinto 100% Performance Bond $39,752.28 100% Labor and Material Bond $39,752.28 Monument Bond $1,000.00 securing the completion of the offsite improvements. Dear Mr. Mc Nabb, In response to the above referenced project with the 200% bond guaranty for completion of the required offsite improvements. The developers, Mr. Gullotta and Mr. Parasol sent you CD's representing this 200% bond required by the city for the offsite improvements on December 6th, 1989. We have since then completed the necessary and required improvements, and request that the 100% performance, 100% labor and material and monument bonds be released to Mr. Gullotta and Mr. Parasol, as they have complied with the city's building requirements. If you have any questions or comments please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, Cindy (clVirch Proje Director E MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: November 30, 1990 SUBJ: Change Order # 1 - Downtown Water Line The design of the Downtown Water Line, currently under construction, originally included the construction of a 12 inch water line in Third Street between Ramona Blvd. and San Jacinto Avenue. This section was part of a link -up of the larger water mains originating from the east side of the City to those from the west side. During the time period in which this project was being bid, staff held several meetings with a group desiring to purchase and renovate the Vosburg Hotel property. This property is dissected by the portion of Third Street in which our water line was to be installed. As a result of these meetings staff arrived at several conclusions related to any future project for the Vosburg Hotel property: 1. Third Street may need to be abandoned between San Jacinto Avenue and Ramona Blvd. 2. Buildings may need to be constructed on what is now the Third Street right- of-way. 3. The new water main may have an adverse economic impact on a proposed Vosburg project, as the main may need to be relocated. After drawing these conclusions, Staff cancelled this portion of the project. However, the link -up between the two sides of the City was still necessary. Staff looked at various routes and alternatives and concluded the route that was most beneficial was one through the alley south of Main Street between Sheriff Avenue and Pico Street, then north to Ramona Blvd. Our contractor has submitted a revised bid for the new construction work based on his original per unit costs, in the amount of $19,424.57. In conferring with Riverside County Department of Economic and Community Development, we have been advised this change order meets the criteria for Continunity Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding (which is the source of funds for the original contract), provided there is a fund balance for this project. To date, there appears to be approximately $30,000 left for this project in our CDBG allotment. Staff recommends the Council approve Change Order #1 in the amount stated above. Respectfully, BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM:lr MEMO TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager FROM: Maurice Armster, City Clerk Elect DATE: 12-03-90 SUBJECT: Deputy City Clerk This memo will advise you that upon my taking the Oath of Office on Tuesday evening, December 4, 1990, as City Clerk, I will deputize Nancy Randolph as Deputy City Clerk to provide City Clerk support on a daily basis. Ms. Randolph has served as Deputy City Clerk, through appointment by Council, since the retirement of Helen Sherman in March, 1990. M E M 0 TO: honorable Mayor and Members of the`Ctty Council Via Pamela S . Easter , City Manager FROM: Henry Garcia, Assistant City Manager DATE: November 30, 1990 SUBJ: BIDS TO RE -ROOF COMMUNITY CENTER AND FIRE DEPARTMENT The Community Center and Fire Department (administration and living quarters only) need to have their respective facilities re -roofed. In the past, rainfall has caused damage to both facilities. In order to avoid further damage this winter, staff has solicited three bids. Two bids were received, with Wcathertight Roofing (of Hemet) not submitting a bid. The, bid results are as follows: (1) Desert Valley Roofing (2) All Weather Roofing $11,875 $15,750 Based on the bid results, staff recommends the City Council award the bid to Desert Valley Roofing for an amount not to exceed $11,875.00. This work was anticipated for this Fiscal Year, and is included in the approved capital outlay budget, in the amount of $22,000. PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO: NAME MR. GARCIA/CITY OF SAN JACINTO JOBNAME CITY OF SAN JAC. C01\11. CENTER, FIRE STREET MAIN STREET STATION & SENIOR CENTER STREET CITY SAN JACINTO gTATE CA' cm, SAN JACINTO STATE C A PP^POSAL AND CONTRACT : )R HOME IMPROVEMENT DESERT VALLEY CONSTRUCTION & ROOFING 445 SOUTH STATE STREET SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA 92383 (714) 654-1980 STATE CONTRACTORS LICENSE NUMBER 447139 PHONE —G5It-7447 DATE 11/2T/00 Contractor proposes to furnish all materials and perform all labor necessary to complete the following: REROOF C0I4MUNITY CENTER, :IRE STATION & SENIOR CENTER: Tear off and reroof Community Center and Senior Center roof. Tear off one (1) section of Fire Station, living quarters and administration section only. Bay areas not in- cluded, and reroof. Does not include the Police Dept. Plywood replacement is $20.00 per sheet extra, permit fee's are extra. Nail 28N fiberglass base sheet, Not mop 2 ply °s glass ply sheet. aot mop 72# cap sheet. Clean up and haul away all roofing debris. 5 year workmanship warranty. 10 year material warranty. FIRE STATION: $2,750.00 COMM. CENTER & SENIOR CENT.$9,7.25.00 All of the above work to be completed in a substantial and workmanlike manner according to standard practices for the sum of Payments to be made as follows: IN to the value of ONE HUNDRED contract to be paid upon completion. This proposal is valid until 12 31 SEE ABOVE Dollars FULL UPON COMPLETION OF EACH BUILDING 00 per cent 100 %) of at work completed. The entire amount of and if accepted on or before that date, work will commence approximately on A.6.A.P. , subject to delays caused by Acts of God, stormy weather, uncontrollable labor trouble, or unforseen circumstances. (CONTRACT) This becomes a contract when signed by both parties or when work is started by us. The undersigned agrees to pay to the Contractor as follows: cash, check, or money order upon completion of roof. 11/20/0 per month will be added to all past due accounts. Copy of this was received before granting contract. During the process of work, should the owner desire additional work, or changes made, which are not included in said contract; the so-called additional work is to be agreed upon by both parties at a definite price in writing and signed by same. If any payment is not made when due, Contractor may suspend work on the job until such time as all payments have been made. Default in payment when same becomes due, shall render the entire balance due and payable immediately. In the event of such default, the Contractor upon placing in the hands of a collector or attorney, be entitled to collect from the undersigned in addition to the face amount of the balance due, the fee and expenses of collection. This contract constitutes the entire agreement; no waivers or modifications shall be valid unless written upon or attached to this contract and signed by both parties. Any warranty implied in this contract will be in effect upon final payment. All claims and litigation shall be settled through arbitration. ACCEPTED BY: SUBM D BY: DAMAGE TO PREMISES DONNIE STACKS DATE' It Is understood that although every effort will be used to protect your property from damage during the process of roofing or demolition prior to reroofing, rains or other Acts of God could unexpectably occur which could result in Interior damage to your property. In such cases, Owner agrees to hold Contractor harmless for damages and homeowner's insurance is to be used. IMPORTANT: Please read reverse side for important information. ALL, WEATHER ROOFING 280 S. Buena Vista, Suite B, San Jacinto, CA 92383 . (714) 654-8000 Contractor's State License No. 330478 PROPOSAL and CONTRACT TO City of San Jacinto Attn: Henry Garcia 201 East Main Street Date November 26 Phone 654-7337 MEMBER �.ymx®e •7 BBB 1-8o0.227.4401 79 90 San Jacinto, California 92383 Dear Slr: All Weather Roofing proposes to furnish all materials and perform all labor necessary to complete the following: Remove roofing down to deck and haul away. Install one layer base sheet, two layer ply sheet, one layer cap sheet and hot mop between each layer. 10 year material warranty by manufacturer 2 year labor warranty by All Weather Roofing +I COMMUNITY CENTER: (t�eei- ha ) * NOTE: A/C unit must be removed and repaired so as not to leak or warranties will be void. PRICE $10,500.00 (Brai G2 Cap Acid: $1,000.00) FIRE DEPARTf-IENT: Office and Kitchen not Garage PRICE $5,250.00 (Brai G2 Cap Add: $350.00) * These prices will be subject to change due to expected petrol um price increases. 1.5% LATE FEE —1 D.JS alter t iflltlg dale di d I Uar1U11 N R The only way to secure price is by 50% deposit upon each 30 days alter billing date. Inili;l�_ signature of contract. This price is valid for 30 days from above date All of the above work to be completed in a substantial and workmanlike manner according to standard practices for the sum of Dollars (s Progress payments to be made as the work progresses to the value of per cent ( %) of all work completed. The entire amount of contract to be paid within days after completion. Any alteration or deviation from the above specifications involving extra cost of material or labor will only be executed upon written orders for same, end will become an extra charge over the sum mentioned in this contract. All agreements must be made in writing. "NOTICE TO OWNER" fSeaion 7015 — eonerectcrs User's, Leer) Under ghs Meehsnles' Lien Lew, any contractor, eutrcontrector, laborer. materiel man or ether person who helps to Improve your property end is net geld for his labor, services or malarial, hat n right to enforce his claim e0ainsl your properly. Under the Few. you Pose prols<t yourself against such claims by Ming. before sing such wank al Improvement, an original contract for the work of improvement... moglicehen thereof, in the elecs of the county recorder of the caunty where the property Is situated end 'squiring that a oantnnm'q peymenl bond be reaa,ded In such pllica. Said bond shell be In an amount nag lees than f bily percent l50%1 of the <nnu est price endehell, rn eddlllen to tiny conditions for the performance of the contract he conditioned ler the payment in lull el the claims of ell persons lurmshing tabor.terrc.5. equipment or mstennls for the work described In fold contract. "Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this contract, or the breach thereof, shall be settled by arbitration inaccordance with the Uniform Rules for Better Business Bureau Arbitration, and the judgement upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may he entered in any Court having jurisdiction thereof." Respectively Submi ted, ay //2_ eaymond Mc Berland Manager ONTRACTOR/REPRESENTATIVE ACCEPTANCE You are hereby authorized to furnish all materials and labor required to complete the work mentioned in the above proposal, for which I/We agree to pay the amount mentioned in said proposal, and according to the terrns thereof. ACCEPTED WHITE — OFFICE COPY YELLOW — BUYERS COPY PINK — OFFICE COPY Date 19 -17( T PLANNING COMMISSION TRANSMITTAL TO CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 4, 1990 SUBJECT: CHANGE OF ZONE 17-90 APPLICANT: PEDRO SANCHEZ 834 E. Shaver Street San Jacinto, CA 92383 (714) 654-5143 DESCRIPTION A proposal for a change of zone from A, Agricultural to R-1, Single Family on approximately 4.76 acres generally located south of Shaver Street at Miramar Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt Ordinance 924 approving change of zone 17-90. STAFF COMMENTS: None STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Hixson and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: November 27, 1990 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CHANGE OF ZONE 17-90 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: DESCRIPTION PEDRO SANCHEZ 834 E. Shaver Street San Jacinto, CA 92383 (714) 654-5143 KEVIN B. KOZAD & ASSOCIATES 151 S. Girard Street Hemet, CA 92344 (714) 652-4454 A proposal for change of zone from A, Agricultural to R-1, Single Family on approximately 4.76 acres generally located south of Shaver Street at Miramar Avenue. EXHIBIT "A" BASE MAP EXHIBIT "B" EXISTING ZONING EXHIBIT "C" EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT "D" EXISTING USES EXHIBIT "E" CIRCULATION ELEMENT EXHIBIT "F" FLOODZONE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The subject property is not located within a known "A" flood zone. The subject property is not within a seismic study zone. Utilities are available to the serve site with mainline extensions. Major streets serving as access to the subject property Shaver Street, Hewitt Street. Miramar Street and Second Street are proposed within the development. PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 10, 1990 PAGE NO. 1 The property is in the range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. DISCUSSION The existing General Plan for the area is Low Density Residential. Current zoning consists of A, Agricultural. Proposed zoning is R- 1, Single Family. Surrounding adjacent zoning consists of R-1, Single Family and A, Agricultural. The site is currently vacant and is surrounded by both vacant and residential uses. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 90- ,79 recommending the City Council approve Change of Zone 17-90 as shown on Exhibit "B", subject to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration. A1r2-,il Brian McNabb Director of Community Development PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 10, 1990 PAGE NO. 2 FINDINGS OF FACT CZ 17-90 1. The subject property of CZ 17-90 is not located within a seismic study zone. 2. CZ 17-90 is not within an "A" Floodzone. 3. Utilities are available to the subject site with mainline extensions. 4. The property is in the range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. 5. The subject property is vacant. Surrounding adjacent uses consist of residential and vacant uses. 6. Shaver Street is designated as an 66' Collector Roadway, Hewitt Street is designated as an 88' Secondary roadway. 7. The existing General Plan is Low Density Residential. 8. Existing zoning is A, Agricultural. Proposed zoning is R-1, Single Family Residential. PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 10, 1990 PAGE NO. 3 11 •`m I,i I1 Al PRRx 1--11/•_1.2Y ' STF1i E a: > 4 to: ea ��...11l 1n 511-1 ST. RE of i 1 sT oR— LsTA EL PION ;h Jf � E5P(„AAf0.DE ,TE SEVENTH SHAVERTST TRACT Z41y0 TRACT 2404-7 MORRISOIJ HOMES TRACT 2S-789 FRIEDMAN HOMES TRACT 24040 LAIN HOMES /o41 4 TRAeT 2ST90 SJU50\ FUTURE SITE EXHIBI T `lA" BASE MAP TRACT NO. 26452 SCALE /N FEET 0 600 /200 /800 2400 KEVIN a. COZAD AND ASSOCIATES,IN C. STRUCTURAL., nd CIVIL ENGINEERS 151 South Girard Street o Hemet, Ca 42:44o(714) 652-4454 JOB O 90-05 i. T, J PRANK 14TE g 6/I/70 c t MAIN fw 5 TH-S r1 SEVENTH ST. SHAVER. 5T R -I C N• - R-I C-I TRACT 24110 R-z TRACT 24041 A-3 TRACT 2:3169 TRACT Z4O48 A 4; EXHIBIT i9" EX/ST/NG ZONING TRACT NO. 26452 .P t7PO D ZONING -R--/ SCALE IN, FEET bo /zo /abo zoo SITAC /R.Alsnd wit ENcwsF7a 151 Saeh Gkud Sb.r a Homo, Ca 92344 • (714) 852.4454 J00 NO. 9O-053T EL spLAN_gp_6 DATE t 0%I/90 - M MAIN ST 1 t I • e_idY� SEVENTH S 14AVE.-jT TRACT 23769 FRIEDMAN NOMES TRACT 23790 S,IVBD ` FUTURE 9tTE EXHIBIT "CU GENERAL FLAN TRACT NO. 26452 LEGEND LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. (3.1-Y(,O DU/AC) MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4". I ^ I E.0 OU/AC) HIGH DENSITY R ES IDENTIAI_ 115.1-25.0 Du/Ara COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL .// DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL SCALE /N FEET rr/ INSTITUTIONAL PARK SITE 600 /200 /800 2400 KEVIN B. COZAO AND ASSOCIATES,INC. S M.RTIIML end oNN.D.GiNtEPS 151 South Girard St...I • Honor, Ca 521AI a (714) 6524454 ,108 NO. 9O-053T TRAP` {y/Has M06/LE yes CA Y/i,,,,,,������ggqqqq r,. .11:..P M• /L /awl CNdRCN I p4c4 'T At STST M.T. PA/ iC H-ST } ; /PTS A'ES/OEN4'4i E�1•ENtr AL SEVENTH ST ,., { � a, s tz �c .t 0rF o CREJ6ENT/ ,pES/DENr/AL a z KaJ Da; Y •0w aa'./iA.4rMEN y 7' < CRYSTA -e 3 ' ¢I a 1... 5 i EL t•17UT EV E,P/UN ALA'S wants J4 j< sPLANAOE yAUNr. ATE I 671/90 10 I •+ VACANT e.19 TRACT 2 fl c' Y/LLA PEG 44ONTE i 4108/L E yaMES _VI AVE.A :_.*T CHURCH RES/DENr/AL 6•H. - XES/iENTML. TRACT E4190 WINDSOR HOMES A SITE ,ffART.NENTS VACANT RES/PENT/AL TRACT 2S-76S FRIEDMAN HOMES TRACT 2404"7 TRACT 24040 MORIIISCN y'M6S LAING HOMES EXHIBIT "D" EXISTING USES TR/CT NO, 26452 SCALE IN FEET 600 /200 /8'00 2400 KEYIH B. COZAD AHD ASSOCIATES ,IHC. STTUCTU1 ,Lt nd CIVIL ENGINEERS 151 South Orate SOoat • Herne; Ca 'B2344 • (114) S524454 JOB NO. 40-O53T • 'TFt 4421 MF3..33/5'5 —56 1 ;oiW k-----I a ' 13�3� Ili' 12 1o'� 15 i 30 I .R1 1 ti 22 1� II.� T �I� 13 r �rJ 14 I 3J ;,, 4,t,,1 1--_ /jjJ1 a rrdr.'A'j lj'frrr71 T1. j R --- S:roYera rox e:rr i.47,�r�—I�q4 SHAVER. ST. rr-/rrrelir errs/der ru 1 ys',al 1444.J.. .'1. t gi ._ ,lD ..tir. .",'web i k` NOT A.( f ATE r 6/1 .rjp PART / [jel l Otl Ft ar' V er/L ATT Gil jeer At nr Old df.•D DA' FAR 8 A1SIAe. /.Yr A/r/•ifr 411l,'5/1ll / . /3A_r /4rl /• e1:lt / lei ' 4 61)R1A'fr GZZ,c Lt.7 e1' 41 34 en- 4_ d.r'1D EXHIBIT "E" EXISTING AND PROPO © CIRCULATION ELEMENT PROPOSED AREA SCALE /// FEEr 0 600 /200 /B00 2500 KEVIH B. COZAD AHD ASSOCIATES,IHC. S 1lu i•url.L T nd CML 4 E41 1S5 Sash Q d Ste-; o H•rnr7, Ca 82344 • (.14f 6524154 Joe. n10. 10-0S3T JS T—DR EL PLAN•mos ATE I 6/i/c>0 IL SJUSO 91TE /14 Ilf Cr 23'190 EXHIBIT "F" FLOOD ZONE TRACT A/O. 26452 OTHER FLOOD AREAS ZONE X Areas of 500.year flood; areas of 100-year flood with average depths of less Ulan 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and •arcas protected by levees from 100. :year flood. OTHER AREAS ZONE X Areas determined to be outside SOO- year flood plain. 600 SCALE INFEET /200 /BOO 2400 KEVIN B. COZAD AND A SSOCIATES .INC. SIBUCTUNAL and COM.EZIGNTESS 151 Smeh Girard Stet • HeDlet, CZ. 92344 • (714 5524454 'JOB NO.90-0S37 777 a1� —/.., I _ 1 I l�l rY I I mrr ,Raf \ sas.mi Mom.. i IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA CSC AT_VE TRACT MA a CHANGE OF ZONE SHA%c. TR_42 1 I IL,' I I 10o. Ik. _�Ic I I :I, 1!°'n i I \ � 1 . I . ^.ss. 73/.:5 It I� II�Wj 1 3:7 `21 I ¢I 14_ i L N 1,•f1 111 G \y _ r.,.,. xa a%s t.vrr-a`�,TT, vr. t S NJ::'l1Ytxn. 1 I I I4; b 13 all $ng:4^r AI, J. • y NUJ O i 1 ; Ct J'1 4,7 • W 1 \�I Ycn.,.E —T— '/ 1 \ sr cET 'P \ fyJ L14: 1/ pn I r Ly6f / ri ArAl" La:. aae IV) SrREEr 2 '/ 442n.4a, n : xs ,Ce ofre.. 4it , Jr,. sol :• i NI' • CH.ch.J'. NIT a ZC C Tr(' N aA too 15a 144 wir5u45* 4,.L'JIa P. all cinut \I� nppra..a 50: O 5' AS .TEc OLL71 u ,99D DMt -R PE:RD A. 5 JAS:C 54NCH12 OD. C. !HAVER 5AN :AGINTD CA. fi365 I714'' 65+.9145 EN,SINEER nrcti 9 CCE.D 5 t550Cl'SES, INC C:YIL 5 001C:TunaL EY1'V(CA5 151 9 91Ptgo STREET YC'l(T, CA 9234{ ICq E52.5454 L9AI, DESCRIPTION P.AT!'N SP THE WEST HALF 6l THE NORTH HSLP LP LDS f Or HT H(WI TT'S PLAT OF SAN 5 !H:{M (V MAP Vi FILE iPa E5044 9, Pi9E ZEE :P \•435. 111::7105 AA SAN DIEGD :AUNTY, CALIPOANIA.'• PROPERTY INFORMATION '.'SEA OP _:.•E JS 40141 A:PEI:C. 4.TO NET t ....S..A 5 PAA:EL 30 431.300.002.10 5 1I EPIST,N3'J5£: L1:1.141 LAID 40 AE51'0I(:IA: E1:ST: S :ON.NO. t.T205 53 N:N3,D,P ;ENEPAL P.AN' LOIN DEN5'ITT PPIPZIED TON71:3 3,4 P':P: CE3 LA\: L55, LOA DENSITY RCnI:ENT166 9:'AA:.Nj:N1 LAND t:LE L'L:ANT a R£51DENT,AL 9 J,1 5 D 1:':34APH: 0';A At'1 to P'.DDD DONTNT. 4ERIt'. M:.P "r • 5'05Y4,( RL'N CFI ^"D '".':E' ::E 'Y_PER f!NA WP ::1E0 5/47/9J 5:4E:J¢ PLR CAD a50' SOH :_E'p' UTILITIES 1Vi:EA CITY Ci 5t4 JA:INTO S£t.EA (WY O! S,TLvwf,Yra l:TRE:TY 5D'.4,,:2 EJ'SDV CA. cis. SO CALIF.:AS :O. 1£.SPHC::S, v":::ERAL TE'.EPH.NE :3. :43_(: INLANO ':ALLEY CA3LCVISION T 7S., PM' SEC. 35 8 36 S 6 /f.. VICINITY MAP Tsu bx Wp Lu1 .3 UTT Of SAN JSCIIITO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26452 0.t.' 990 Oencn M.rh. N/A I FCr. 54N:.E1 Pt6a 1p4.- -rn 442] M3. —58 1 12 1 1...,i,ti it1114,1 1 111c111 I— . —1-- 1 1 i' _40 , 1 ilk. j.,,,,..j FAR 8 1 i, Crck \-r2trI\ 1 1 RIV1 I 1 1 1-1Z-k1 ;1,\'1 \ 1' 22 1--i -------,:::: 1 r I • 1 13 11..1111.),„:1 14 1 I 31 ! Olafrzrd I l' I L J 11 t.',_ i , , ) 1 1,1, \i__ iralara rear -Li 77-t—'—' ''-yrrond.r.? ra'A'' 0:mei LIP!'" I \ SHAVR..STREETN.,:fr, FV01 IF 0Vrr41* 't ' re • tz 1.'07' Al p,AF.;; M R-1,1 Single F 4:1 13 1 AS1 alt 0.t.fll :''';7 I e 0 ...,1C ,., . 111- "Ir ' + , eq' i7i1 4 7-uUE--"*_;, \ - . . AST 1.1 10 GI) At 021 A DAME 8/1/90 Al Air .012 4.00:1! • ICE • amer.rctr a,, At Itt."11 hr 4/1Ae.Aar 0.1: Az atf1d aef 6 • `11`4r1 ‘1..1, 11-',: ,,_ 1 1:,,,, r ,:: ,,; . I 11 • •) , 9' ,1 •• '' r ...1 ' , 1 '' 11 .,11,..i' ,t• ' d 1 • 'i - . • it ,__iiL 1 ill 1.1 1 5''' 1 ir I 1$?' I j LtLl L1 L EL P.011""=.1), 'Z TRACT 2V13E3 t3tACt t 4,0 wiNOSOE r9r2g,11"" T — r TRACT 240.11 i TE:nCT 24030 t+OEVISC, 1 LALNO MOI,C9S SJUtO PLITLEZ 9tTE• EXIIIBIT "A" PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE OF ZONE 17-90 ORDINANCE 924 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ORDINANCE NO. 924 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 17-90 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby amended by adding thereto Change of Zone 17-90 as herein set forth. Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the City of San Jacinto shown on the attached map marked Exhibit "A" made a part hereof, is hereby established as R-1, Single Family. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 4th day of December 1990 by the following vote: MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 1990 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. 924 duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of 1990. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of 1990. City Clerk -2- -In. 4421 . ,,i a 73 /5'5 -5 6 11-.1CiI, :t1 I 1 1 1 ,...:•,)'...) .,.,;_) I 112! I I 1 k \ 3 30 i, ii 12 1 1-4:LU I ' I I 11 II 15 Tr, I I .... 1 1 ZIk: -- -- -1 IN:...-.1 In I 13 1,,,V.,..,, I 4 1 31 v1111_/1:141:. 111N7 1 I I /I ) il i ilS ...— — ----Li ) ) .e.I.II/I.?.? 1,181- 11.711.1.-.1 II.1111 1 SI 'AVER Sr El !:......fr., e:...1 e orrre.e. \ — ., :t ' DATE OW I /:"...0 III zatzAr at/ _ 111119IE 1ws. 10 1 41171 I/Er 421 11. 11/1/71 93' FA :7 .11,1- C11.1.1:1(f" amlly 5 r 042 .1 1,111 .11" /J., it.',, I I. Y• ATE ,.1...,),,,2'4 II 't .....1_ iL_J L_,I'L Ji .; : c :ill .19' ,,,,,•-•,',L; __:':..L.__ , j1F ''--1 :- ±',Li:„,,,p,,.; _-_-, I ti_i A , • /,, . i ..:._ N., Jiltiqiii , ,,,.. •-)''..• iii-,F 1 • 2,1046 r'N\ MCI, 14.7,,,IP .51-tE EXHIBIT "A" PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE OF ZONE 17-90 ORDINANCE 924 PLANNING COMMISSION TRANSMITTAL TO CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL MEETING DA I L: December 4, 1990 SUBJECT: CHANGE OF ZONE 21-90 APPLICANT: SIEVE HOLGA I E, 73239 Boxthorn Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 346-4483 DESCRIPTION A proposal for change of zone from R-1, Single Family to C-2, General Commercial on approximately .94 acres located 660' east of Sanderson Avenue between Cottonwood Avenue and Seventh Street within Tentative Parcel Map 26119. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt Ordinance 925 approving change of zone 21-90. STAFF COMMENTS: None STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Hixson and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: November 27, 1990 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CHANGE OF ZONE 21-90 APPLICANT: ENGINEER: DESCRIPTION STEVE HOLGATE 73239 Boxthorn Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 346-4483 UNLAND & ASSOCIATES 41640 E. Florida Avenue, Suite C Hemet, CA 92344 (714) 652-5575 A proposal for change of zone from R-1, Single Family to C-2, General Commercial on approximately .94 acres located 660' east of Sanderson Avenue between Cottonwood Avenue and Seventh Street within Tentative Parcel Map 26119. EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT "B" EXHIBIT "C" EXHIBIT "D" EXHIBIT "E" EXISTING ZONING EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXISTING USES CIRCULATION ELEMENT PROPOSED ZONING ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The subject property is not located within a known "A" flood zone. The subject property is not within a seismic study zone. Utilities are available to the serve site with mainline extensions. On one major street, Sanderson Avenue, will serve as access to the subject property. The property is in the range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 10, 1990 PAGE NO. 1 DISCUSSION The existing General Plan for the area is Community Commercial and Low Density Residential. Current zoning consists of R-1, Single Family. Surrounding adjacent zoning consists of R-1, Single Family and C-2, General Commercial. The property as proposed under the Tentative Parcel Map 26119 is inconsistent with current zoning making a 60' strip of land which could not be developed. The applicant proposes a change of zone from R-1, Single Family to C-2, General Commercial consistent with the proposed parcel mapping. The site is currently vacant and is surrounded by vacant areas. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 90- 85 recommending the City Council approve Change of Zone 21-90 as shown on Exhibit "E", subject to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration. 194-2v), Brian McNabb Director of Community Development PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 10, 1990 PAGE NO. 2 FINDINGS OF FACT CZ 21-90 1. The subject property of CZ 21-90 is not located within a seismic study zone. 2. CZ 21-90 is not within an "A" Floodzone. 3. Utilities are available to the subject site with mainline extensions. 4. The property is in the range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. 5. The subject property is vacant. Surrounding adjacent uses consist of vacant uses. 6. Sanderson Avenue is designated as a 134' Urban Arterial Roadway. Discussion for a 50' scenic easement is also being considered for Sanderson Avenue. 7. The existing General Plan is Community Commercial and Low Density Residential. 8. Existing zoning is R-1, Single Family Residential. Proposed zoning is C-2, General Commercial. PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 10, 1990 PAGE NO. 3 'COTTONWOOD AVENUE �IIl Ik:t4 /f PAR, 2 1 Community Commercial TT) 1-1-SEVENTH STREET loi Community Commercial L :; / / EXHI(3IT "A" EXISTING GENERAL PLAN TT 26118 Low Density Residential 100.00 °"51— t def.t I>o!' mo' / 9 P� C 11 C1' 4\° 16/ r4� ./ : 10 . 25 26 „ • ^4I : C • PARCEL I / 3 II y�llt. < 3 24L.13 21 T1 39 = O Community Commercial 3' ,,I / 3 I' 'QI' 1 t rt ..gla�a '°I.3: ,a 'Sr- • z J !L Low Density Residential 3,: // 3 13 IIQ' 'S •w 3 22' . j3 29 •9',,,Nt S 7T a"— A •L�'t' 179' {I 114' �t�lr:1° 1{0 (:• / 3 I< 'S i !21 '53 30 d3W'.1 36 2 L. 3 15 5 k 3 20 S ., 31+ P„ I `c, to Z 7 w 3 11 •5 1° ti 771.15 3 14 I.: 32 • 3 I9 ,5[,f Low Density Residential ______Ii--4 COTTONWOOD AVENUE Ili ill il C-2, General Commercial M. 4$/92,93 J .-1*-:-111-SEVENTH STREET C-2, General Commercial L IZ 72.Ce ,/-"/ 660 ' to centerl in /. /V/ of SandersonI Pel.::10EL.J / C-2, General Commercial EXHIBIT "B" EXISTING ZONING TT 26118 R-1, Single Family • r / \ 11 /3 4,4.4 11 11 11 1, 6 '2 6'431 3 '2 0 1 19. 91 49. :24 • 1 . 1) 1 1111i,211,35s4 2". ' I'•- R-1 Singa6*lI;,Z ';-e r F67 ,a' ,,.,.'m*:.'.a;;.i,1l/1'1, ,I y1,1 (. .o333" f 1. .14'7 .•6'14,1 ;c03 2233 29 3; 13vf qf I;; ),/ 1)715 'V . / 131°\i ' 4: 1171.01-, R-1, Single Family y. -r4• / ..i.----COTTONWOOD AVENUE 1;88' Secondary Roadway 1 ! iLo 1 1 1212.24' pm.* kok.....••• PAgiCEL I / TENT. 1E71.15 2 48/92,93 -SEVENTH STREET 88' Secondary Roadway EXHIBIT "C" EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT TT 26118 r .4. 1 1 600.00' / .4.,.. ".• / 'Xa. 14 41 444 44 44.1 ft . 4 / \:''P'8 '2 ..,5/4, 4 1 3 21 2 i- 1 ! l's/ •Ph•44 4.k.. • 11/ If I 44. 41. i9 ''"•-'7,41.:z2r.c_71.,..?:,(..._.................._a 4).1• ..,F.,..*.i...4.J.4.4 r„S...,..... ......_ i 10 ..j ) t . al 44 • 14A.4 ""'"•IX.........41 1 ,:/' i. k r• 25 '4;2 26 "5 • 2J 43 ' • •a• 1 f • 1:' *. 1 ,..3. /1F2 223 3, „, 3 i i 23 313'<xi 43 'Y . i• I ,,,. WO 'E i 1:1. 3' 13 ''' ',,,"•• 2;121' .313 2,19/ *3 21 *ea 30 ;-• \ . • 20 5: i 31 Pl 1 "••:• 35 . " 14 3 1 15 .5 1/ tza• • "I" 3 16 .50 orc /•al / 17 9 I° I • 59 l 1 7. —...111....- 32 • ,34 , i o 01' "" NI. / ill' II . , Farmland COTTONWOOD AVENUE e1l� 2 PARCEL I '/ Vacant II -SEVENTH STREET Poul try Agricultural r,9 /PAR. 2 F;I` . i°°, />2,03 00.00' / 11 • 8 7 r�J "`acw r 23 26 r 4 01 � 24 '413 27 • id3 1. 39 0! ,.-• 1,• O b 3 2}Vac%ant 3a s;. Rural Residential 3 13 '3 °� I 22 : 8(3 29 's 1',,,, 3 377i - u Il ro' �lo111 ' Ir0 r� EXHIBIT "D" CURRENT USES TT 26118 64 / 41 S'•y 4 '3 3 £� 2 11 ( b 111• ^I` I,R' L 1.4 3 15 91 y3 20 :' 31 13' 1 `1. 35 f r $ n" °� 16 'SO3 19 9 w' r I 3 17 3/'10 3• —7 NWc AVENUE a /87Z.Ci✓° ZONE CHANGE PLAT 000.00 / V, AL, 2 n / O / ` SUB;. AREA FOR ZONE CR.4N6E /2.74425 SEVENT'-1 'ST.' -4144 j 6.00.co° APPLICANT STEVE HOLGATB 73239 BOXTHORN PALM DESERT, CA 92260 (419) 346-4487 JOHA; H ZWEIFEL JAMS R SNEIFEL 45] DE ANZA DR SAN JACINTO, CA 92383 IX/STING ZoMI R-1 (PRE -ANNEXATION) PROPOSED ZON$ C-2 PESCRIPTIO(i .That portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 9873, recorded in Book 48, Pages 92 and 97 of Par- . cel Naps Riverside County Records, Califor- nia, described as follows: 'BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of said . Parcel 17 aitT7CE North 29' 54' 48' vest a distance of 600.00 feat to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TEESCE South:Do' 03' 230 Nast a distance of 661.02 feet;_. THENCE North 89' 54' 43• Vest a'distance of -. 61.95 fast; r THENCE North;00' 02' 49' East a distance of 661.01 feet;: THENCE South 89' 54' 48' East a distance of 62.06 feet to !ha TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 0.94t Jofr,es W. Un and & Associote4 CIVIL E N O• I N E E R 7 ...LW CLLNr4mWrom YJV.Jtmta\s Hemet, CA 923U4 (714) 6525575 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lU ll 12 13 4 I 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ORDINANCE NO. 925 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL or THE czrr OF oAm JAczmTm/ CALIFORNIA uPeonvzmo ooANoo OF Znmo uz~yo AMomozmn ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO THE CITY coomczL OF THE ozrY OF onN JAozmTo 000a eoaoor ououzm AS roLLuwo: Section z. That ordinance No. 340 is hereby amended by adding thereto Change of Zone 21-90 as herein set foctb, Section o. That the zoning of the property in the City of San Jacinto shown on the attached map marked Exhibit »&n made a part hereof, is hereby established as n-z, General coomercial, Section z. The city Clerk shall certify to the adoption of.tbia ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the «tb day of December 1990 by the following vote: MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the city Council on the day of z000 by the following vote, AYES: muoo: City Clerk -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. 925 duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of 1990. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of 1990. City Clerk -2- ZONE CHANGE PLAT APPLICANT STEVE HOLGATE 73239 BOXTHORII PALM DESERT, CA 92260 (619) 346-4483 OWNERS JOHN H ZWEIFEL JAMES R ZWEIFEL 453 DE ANZA DR SAN JACINTO, CA 92383 EXISTING ZONE, R-1 (PRE -ANNEXATION) RROPOSEP ZONE C-2 'DESCRIPTION That portion of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 9873, recorded in Book 48, Pages 92 and 93 of Par- cel Maps Riverside County Records, Califor- nia, described as follows; BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of said Parcel 1; THENCE North 69' 54' 48' West a distance of 600.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 00' 03' 23" West a distance of 661.02 feet; THENCE North 89° 54' 43" West a distance of 61.95 feet; THENCE North 00° 02' 49" East a distance of 661.01 feet; THENCE South 89° 54' 46" East a distance oft 62.0G feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ACREAGE 0.942. EXHIBIT "A" PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE OF ZONE 21-90 ORDINANCE 925 PLANNING COMMISSION 'IIZANSMITIAL TO CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL MEETING DA I E: December 4, 1990 SUBJECT: Change of Zone 24-90 APPLICANT: City of San Jacinto DESCRIPTION A proposal for a pre -annexation change of zone to A, Agricultural in the unincorporated area located north of Cottonwood Avenue, east of Lyon Avenue, between Chase and Young Street and west of Palm Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt Ordinance 926 approving pre -annexation Change of Zone 24-90 as shown on Exhibit "PC of Ordinance 926, subject to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration. STAFF COMMENTS: None STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Hixson and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: November 9, 1990 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CHANGE OF ZONE 24-90 APPLICANT: CITY INITIATED DESCRIPTION A proposal for a pre -annexation change of zone to R-1, Single Family and A, Agricultural in the unincorporated area located north of Cottonwood Avenue, east of Lyon Avenue, between Chase and Young Street and west of Palm Avenue. EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT "A" EXISTING ZONING EXHIBIT "B" CURRENT USES EXHIBIT "C" EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT EXHIBIT "D" FLOODZONE EXHIBIT "E" SEISMIC EXHIBIT "F" PROPOSED ZONING EXHIBIT "G" ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS A majority of the subject property is not located within a known "A" flood zone. A small portion on the northeast corner of Cottonwood and Lyon Avenue is within an "A" zone. The majority of the subject property is not within a seismic study zone, however a zone exists which runs in a southeast to northwest direction crossing the northeast corner of Cottonwood and Lyon Avenues. Utilities are available to the serve site with extensions. PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 14, 1990 PAGE NO. 1 Major streets serving the subject property are Lyon Avenue, Chase Street, Young Street, Palm Avenue and Cottonwood Avenue. The property is in the range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. Single family residential uses exists on the subject property, the remainder is agricultural and vacant uses. Surrounding uses include single family residential and vacant areas. DISCUSSION The existing general plan for the area is Low Density Residential. Adjacent general plan designations are also Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential. The subject property currently has no City zoning designation. The property is within the City's Sphere of Influence and should be zoned consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The site consists of residential and vacant uses. Uses immediately surrounding the site are single family residential and vacant areas. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 90- 90 recommending the City Council approve pre -annexation Change of Zone 24-90 as shown on Exhibit "G", subject to the Findings of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration. Brian McNab Director of Community Development PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 14, 1990 PAGE NO. 2 FINDINGS OF FACT CZ 24-90 1. A special seismic study area is located within CZ 24-90, the zone crosses the subject site in a southeasterly to northwesterly direction at the northeast corner of Cottonwood and Lyon Avenue. 2. CZ 24-90 is within an "A" Flood zone, however the majority of the site is within a Zone "X". The "A" zone crosses the subject site at the northeast corner of Cottonwood and Lyon Avenue. 3. Utilities are available to the subject site with extensions. 4. The property is in the range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. 5. The subject property consist of residential and vacant uses. The surrounding land uses are vacant and residential uses. 6. Chase Street and Young Street are both 60' Local roadways, Lyon Avenue and Palm Avenue are both 88' Secondary roadways, Cottonwood Avenue is a 110' Major roadway. 7. The General Plan for the area is Low Density Residential. The proposed zoning is A, Agricultural and R-1, Single Family PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 14, 1990 PAGE NO. 3 • 2 41. R. CITY umrrs Low Density Residential COT'PONWOOD 410./ Deni Low. Density Residential Low Density Residential 1 _ EXHIBIT "A"' CHANGE OF ZONE 24-90 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN f-T Me jitin ql% --poTRERo-5T • • Low, Density Residential MAN/ AI TA 011- C y ercial ity Resjdentj.1 ^IV CA ih r c° 2 K 'r. Igsa.hg A, Agricultural 5. c rry imrns R•I R-1, Single Family . COTrOMVOOD AVENUE e., R-1, Single F''aniily; C-1 f4 ,'Single Family h'- t� -'1 • EXHIBIT "B" CHANGE OF ZONE 24-90 EXIS'1•iNG ZONING R-1i Single ,Family . A n 1 Ali TA OR I,e ,v CAUJvt- �.1uII IfOR , R-1, 'Single Family. , P N SPOTS RO—,y c•2 ercial p IN 4 F, Agricultural crr Agricultural ' I COT2'ONWOOD AVENU13 o d 6, Agricu u e Vacant p•1 P"i . a� Vacant Agricultural Vacant Agricultural ^-POTRCAG-$T 4i° • •I Vacant K-;1- K - .�. •L' L LLA._ I• Vacant Agricultural x INI I EXHIBIT "C" CHANGE OF ZONE 24-90 CURRENT USES M AN E AN I T A 0 R-T c -1 cz 0 I, I COTTONWOOD AVENU]3. 100' Major Roadway climd mm 0 elms V) C)f3 ao gI. f{ • I 1 r••I - eu ^ EXHIBIT "D" CHANGE OF ZONE 24-90 EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT MA h! ANITA DR R - r C -a C•2. .r: ZONE C SAN JA CINTO RESERVOIR tit z w LIMIT OF STUDY EXHIBIT "E" CHANGE OF ZONE 24-90 FLOODZONE ZONE C San Juciizto ResC1-2,uzl. isoo IS ea le all Jac 44.4 • , CTIT LIMITS 601tdNWOOD AVENUE 0 R. • I • I • 0• 1 'R-1, Single Family R-1, Single Family EXHIBIT ''Gr CHANGE OF ZONE 24-90 PROPOSED ZONING '19 R - T MANZ ANITA Dil- YC. A ' •I, IA 0 F1 — C SP c -.2 c•z 2 3 4 5 6 ORDINANCE NO. 926 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 24-90 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 7 Section 1. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby 8 amended by adding thereto Change of Zone 24-90 as herein set forth. 9 Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the 10 City of San Jacinto shown on the attached map marked Exhibit "A" made a part hereof, is hereby established as A, 11 Agricultural. 12 13 14 15 16 17 1 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3 32 Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 4th day of December 1990 by the following vote: MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 1990 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk -1- 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 12 3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3 32 CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. 926 duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of 1990. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of 1990. City Clerk -2- vt COTrnNWOOD 9 crrx zuM ris R•I g•1 z • o• - • A A, Agricultural A, Agricultural • A, Agricultural F' I • / , tc_1 • U AN I ANIMA OF• sw 'AY GAUJy, —Jt" -1 EXHIBl'1"A" PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE OF ZONE 24-90 ORDINANCE 926 R-T C•2 MEMO TO: HOW6RABLE )'IAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: P. EASTER SUBJECT: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE REQUEST FOR FUNDS DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 1990 The purpose of this memorandum is to transmit the attached request from the Chamber of Commerce for $15,000 in funds to assist in the operation of the Chamber. The Chamber has also submitted the attached Program of Work that identifies City related activities that they would plan to perform for the remainder of 1990-91 Fiscal Year. Our approved 1990-91 Fiscal Year budget does not include funding for the Chamber of Commerce or for the Downtown Business Association (DBA), who has also requested funds. At this point, the requested funds for the Chamber would need to come from our unappropriated General Fund fund balance or from our San Jacinto Redevelopment project budget. There is sufficient funds in our Redevelopment Project budget to fund this amount. l88EAST MAIN STREET SAN JxC|NTO, CAS23O3 714 654~9246 "The oldest Incorporated CitYin Riverside (ou tY Located in the San Jacinto Valle.r­ Promoting the Commercial Industrial Economic Agricultural and Civic Interest o,San Jacinto and the San Jacinto Valley. November 30, 1990 Ms' Pam Easter, City Mgr. City Hall - 207 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92383 Dear Pam, I am submitting this written request of city funds on behalf of the San Jacinto Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors' Since I tfme, I prnvide g a r d i n g request have been with the Chamber a lfmited wfll try to the best of my knowledge a brief background of information re - the city funding issue, along with a for Continued funding, For several years, the Chamber has received funds from the City, with periodic annual increases' In fiscal year 1988-89, we re- ceived $15,000 (a $5,000 increase over the previous year ), In late May or early June 1990, Executive Dir- ector , Judy Whitson presented Mr' Ross Nammar with a forecasted budget, an actual budget and a request for the same nmnunt of funding as the previous year /$15,000l and requested that the monies be paid in installments' Mrs' Whitson repnrts that Mr' Nammar felt rather than the Chamber requesting funds every year before the Council, they would try to get it worked into their annual budget so the funds would be autn- matic' Consequently, city funding was an integral part of our budget plan for this year. We had planned on receiving $3,750 in September, December, March and June' To date, we have not received any funds and quite frankly, some of the plans that we have budgeted for are fn jeopardy if we do not receive funding in the very near future' Ms' Pam Easter Re: City Funding November 30, 1990 Page Two Unfortunotely, both Judy Hhi tson ond Ross Nommor both left their positions during this budget process and apparently it was never placed in the budget plon. He are therefore asking for continued annual funding of $115,000, with installments of September and December ($7,500) to be paid as soon as possible. If there is anything further you need from the Chamber to exoediote this needed funding, pleose let me knQw' We certainly appreciate your effort and attention towards this matter' 3incerely, Nancp J. H—enry Executive Director 188 EAST MAIN STREET SAN JACINTO, CA 92383 714 - 654-9246 "The oldest Incorporated Cin• in Riverside County Located in the San Jacinto Valley" Promoting the Commercial Industrial Economic Agricultural and Civic Interest of San Jacinto and the San Jacinto Valley. NOVEMBER 26, 1990 MS. PAM EASTER, CITY MANAGER CITY OF SAN JACINTO CITY HALL - 201 EAST MAIN STREET SAN JACINTO, CA 92383 DEAR PAM, WE ARE SUBMITTING FOR YOUR REVIEW A "PROGRAM OF WORK", OUTLINING ITEMS OF INTEREST BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO AND THE SAN JACINTO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. NOT ONLY DO WE HELP THE CITY THROUGH ENHANCING THE .LOCAL BUSINESSES, BUT ALSO GET INVOLVED AND ASSIST THE CITY ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS, ESPECIALLY THOSE ISSUES THAT HAVE A DIRECT OR INDIRECT EFFECT ON THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY (I.E. THE PARK HILL ISSUE). MANY HOURS AND DOLLARS WERE SPENT ON THE CITY'S AND CHAMBERS' BEHALF IN THIS JOINT ISSUE. WE HAVE ALSO MADE SEVERAL ATTEMPTS TO CONTACT THE SAN JACINTO BUSINESS ASSOCIATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF DETERMINING A WORKING AND ORGANIZATIONAL RELATION- SHIP BETWEEN THEM AND THE CHAMBER. WE WILL CON- TINUE TO PURSUE THIS MATTER. SINCE YOUR ARRIVAL, WE HAVE DERIVED MUCH SATISFACT- ION FROM OUR WORK WITH AND FOR THE CITY. WE LOOK FORWARD TO MANY YEARS OF THIS KIND OF PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP, BUT AT THIS TIME, WE NEED THE CITY'S FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO CONTINUE OUR ENDEAVORS, WE APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION IN THIS MATTER. IF YOU NEED FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CALL. B. R. "Boe" HICKS PRESIDENT ENCLOSURE ANCY HENRY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR "PROGRAM OF WORK" LEGISLATIVE AND TRANSPORTATION ISSUES: * REVIEW LEGISLATIVE AND TRANSPORTATION ISSUES AT THE LOCAL, COUNTY AND STATE LEVELS THAT MIGHT HAVE AN AFFECT ON THE CITY AND THE CHAMBER AND TAKE ACTION ACCORDINGLY. SAN JACINTO BUSINESS ASSOCIATION: * PLAN TO COMBINE EFFORTS WITH THE SAN JACINTO BUSINESS ASSOCIATION ON AN ANNUAL SEMINAR FOR LOCAL BUSINESSES ON HOW TO SET UP YOUR OWN SMALL BUSINESS. TOPICS TO BE DISCUSSED ARE: BOOK- KEEPING, ACCOUNTING, BUSINESS POLICIES, SALES- MANSHIP, INSURANCE, MOVING AHEAD, PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, BUSINESS PLAN, HELPFUL HINTS, AND FRANCHISING. REVIEW OF BUSINESS LICENSE ORDINANCE * PLAN TO REVIEW AND GIVE INPUT REGARDING ANY ORDINANCES IMPACTING THE BUSINESSES IN THE CITY. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: * THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHAIRMAN TO CONTACT THE CITY STAFF AND WORK CLOSELY WITH THEM TOWARDS AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT WILL ENHANCE THE CITY TAX REVENUE BASE. * CONTINUE OUR CURRENT INVOLVEMENT WITH THE V.E.D.C. AS AN ACTIVE MEMBER AND BOARD MEMBER. PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS/PUBLIC. INFORMATION: * PROVIDE JOINT PARTICIPATION IN THE UPDATING OF A PROMOTIONAL TAPE FOR THE CITY AND BUSINESSES WI t r,IN THE CITY Or SAN :JACINTC *' DISSEMINATION OF FOLDERS CONTAINING DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION AND PERTINENT FACTS/POINTS OF INTER- EST REGARDING THE CITY, COMMUNITY AND VALLEY TO PROSPECTIVE DEVELOPERS, PROPRIETORS, BUS- INESSES, ETC. * PROVIDE THE CITY, FREE OF CHARGE, WITH FOLDERS FOR DISSEMINATION OF ANY MATERIALS AS THEY DEEM NECESSARY * PROVIDE CITY MAPS AND PRELIMINARY WORKBOARDS TO THE CITY'S PLANNING DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW AND SIGN -OFF PRIOR TO PRINTING; ALSO PROVIDE THE CITY, FREE OF CHARGE, 1,000 COPIES OF SUCH MAPS, FOR PROMOTIONAL AND/OR INFORMATIVE PURPOSES. * THE CHAMBER AGREES TO RESERVE ONE COLUMN OF THE CHAMBERS MONTHLY NEWSLETTER FOR A CITY -AUTHORED "PROGRAM OF WORK" NOVEMBER 76, 1990 PAGE Two ARTICLE RELATED TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND BUSINESS -ORIENTED ACTIVITIES. THE CHAMBER AGREES TO WORK WITH K.W.R.P. RADIO STATION IN PROMOTING ANY COMMUNITY CALENDAR EVENTS WITH INFORMATION THAT CAN BE DISSEMINATED WITHIN THE VALLEY REGARDING ANY EVENTS, NEWS, FACTS' DATA FOR THE CITY OF SAN jACINTO. San Jacinto Fire Department November 28, 1990 TO: City Council via City Manager Pamela Easter FROM: Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief SUBJECT: Weed Abatement Committee I am recommending for City Manager and City Council consideration the following make-up of a City of San Jacinto Weed Abatement Committee: City Council Fire Committee 2 Citizens chosen by Council 2 Weed Abatement Contractors chosen by Council Fire Prevention Officer Bob Wilson Fire Chief Ross Chadwick I propose that the City Council select the two citizens and two weed abatement contractors. If City Council members can provide any names of suggested committee members to the Mayor by the December 18th Council meeting, this committee could be foimed and in action by the end of December or first of January. I have provided a list of current contractors for Council's information. I have put an "x" by the contractors who do the most contracting for the City. I look forward to this opportunity of reviewing our weed abatement program with the expectation that this Committee will come up with an innovative program which will accomplish both the City's and community's goals. ROSS CHADWICK Fire Chief FIRE DEPARTMENT 180 WEST SIXTH STREET • SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA 92383 • 714 - 654-2702 1990 LICENSED WEED ABATEMENT CONTRACTORS T,TST REV 10/10/90 NOTATION: THE BELOW LISTED CONTRACTORS HAVE OBTAINED CITY BUSINESS LICENSES. THE CITY CANNOT MAKE RECC M'IENDATIONS NOR STAND BEHIND WORKMANSHIP OF THE BELOW; THIS LIST IS MADE AVAILABLE FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE ONLY. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT YOU OBTAIN ESTIMATES PRIOR TO MAKING YOUR SEZECTION TO AVOID COSILY FEES OR MISUNDERSTANDINGS. IF THE CITY CHOOSES A CONTRACTOR FROM THIS LIST, THE CONTRACTOR MUST ABIDE BY ALL CITY AND STATE ORDINANCES FOR CLEARANCE ANT CLEAR PROPERTY LINE TO PROPERTY LINE WITH NO BORDERS. ALL THATCH OR DEBRIS MUST ALSO BE REMOVED FROM PROPERTY of CLEARANCE IS CITY -ORIENTED. ODAS ROSE TRACTOR SERVICE 969 EVANS STREET SAN JACINTO, CA 92383 PHONE# 714-654-9021 CITY T,TC# 16504 HERTERICH' S TRACTOR SERVICE 2073 WHITMAN SAN JACINTO, CA 92383 PHONE# 714-766-0837 CITY T,TC# 15874 BILL WHITE TRACTOR SERVICE 33912 KEITH HEMET, CA 92344 PHONE# 714-926-9782 927-1600 CITY T,TC# 15133 RAY `I'OUNCET TRACTOR SERVICE PHONE# 714-658-2772-685-0958 CITY LIC# 16779 TODZ GARDENING SERVICE (FODOR 437 FIRST STREET SAN JACINTO, CA 92383 PHONE# 714-654-1320 CITY LIC# 17013 DENNIS BLEHM'S WEED ABATEMENT 26173 NOTRE DAME COURT HEMET, CA 92344 PHONE# 714-927-1078 CITY LTC# 16365 MIKE KAZAROFF TRACTOR SERVICE 233 S. DILLON ST. SAN JACINTO, CA 92383 PHONE# 714-654-7648 CITY T,TC# 16852 WESTERN FARM SERVICE 801 S. GRAND -PO BOX 96 SAN JACINTO, CA 92383 PHONE# 714-654-9301 CITY T,TC# 16277 CRIS NEWCOMB 25996 GEORGIA COURT HEMET, CA 92343 PHONE# 714-927-5490 CITY T,TC# 16507 MATHEWSON'S TRACTOR SERVICE 38536 MENLO, HEMET, CA 92343 PHONE: 714/658-9947 CITY LICf 17250 KARL' S TRACTOR SERVI( 1- P . O. BOX 1124 HEMET, CA 92343 PHONE# 714-658-2328 CITY LTC# 15935 HARV'S TRACTOR (HARVEY) 38610 COTTONWOOD AVE. SAN JACINTO, CA 92383 PHONE# 714-654=2888 CITY T,TC# 15867 PRECISE LANDSCAPING 375 ESPLANADE SAN JACINTO, CA 92383 PHONE# 714-654-5654 CITY T,TC# 16468 RHEINGANS 28395 VISTA DEL VALLE HEMET, CA 92344 PHONE# 714-658-3784 CITY LIC# 17153