HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 8/4/1992AGENDA
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
DATE: August 4, 1992
TIME: 7:30
PLACE: COMMUNITY CENTER
625 South Pico
San Jacinto, California
LO CALL TO ORDER
Roll Call
Nlornent of Silence fur Reflection
1)101h2e of Allegiance
2.0 REDEVELOPMENT .AGENCY
3.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
3. I Presentation hy McCarmev (Eagle N101111Llill PIHCCH
4.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any person may address the Council on any subject pertaining to city business not listed on
the agenda, during this portion or the meeting. A limitation of three (3) minutes shull be set
for each person desiring to address the Council.
5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to he routine and will he enacted by
one motion by the City Council in the lorm
There will he nu s.:..p:11-:nc discussion on these items prior to 1.11C Ill( I ()I1 unless members of the,
City Council, staff or the public requests specified items to he 1.1-riovcd and/or discussed.
Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come forward, upon invitation of
the Mayor, state their name, address and the Consent Calendar item number. Speakers should
limit comments to three minutes.
5.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting of July 7. 1992
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July
7, 1992 as presented.
5.2 Minutes of Special Joint Meeting of July 14. 1992
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Joint Meeting of
July 14, 1992 as presented.
Warrant Register
RECOMMENDATION: Approve Warrant No. 29351 through 29477 dated
July 31, 1992, in the amount of $364,34.77 and payroll check numbers_20418
throueh 20506 in the amount of $92,458.61 dated July 31. 1992.
5.4 Claim - GTE Telephone Operations - JS 92-18
RECOMMENDATION: Reject the Claims for incidents on 3-17-92 and 4-
27-92 as recommended by the Claims Adjustor pursuant to Government Code.
5.5
Claim - Environmental Industries Inc.(\Vestcrn Landscape) - JS 93-01
RECOMMENDATION: Reject Claim us recommended by the claims
Adjustor pursuant to Government Code.
Claim - Dii sie niar,_ ieunitie L.
RECOMMENDATION: Reject Claim a.ti recommended by the City Attorney
pursuant to Government Code.
Truck Routes Ordinance Amendment
RECOMMENDATION: Waive the full reading of Ordinance No. 959 and
ready by title only, and adopt (Second Reading).
ORDINANCE NO. 959
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF' SAN JACINTO
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 931.
5.8 1992 Weed Abatement Collection for Regular Tax Bill
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. confirming the cost of
Weed Abatement and providing for the collection on the regular tax bill for
unrecnvered weed abatement costs.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE COST OF ABATEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR
THE COLLECTION ON THE REGULAR TAX BILL
5.9 Change of Zone 3-91, all Related to Annexation 66
Location: West of Sanderson Avenue to the Ridgeline of The Lakeview
Mountains, North of Esplanade Avenue to the San Jacinto River North of the
Ramona Expressway — _
RECOMMENDATION: Adapt (second reading) -Ordinance No. 960 and.
waive the reading in full, and read by title only Approving Change of Zone 3-
91.
ORDINANCE NO. 960
A ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 3-91 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY
OF SAN JACINTO
5.10 Environmental Impact ,Assessment and Z_anine Ordinance Amendment 3-92
RECO:Il1IENDATION: Adopt (Second Reading) Ordinance No. 961 and
waive the reading in full. and read by title only, amending Ordinance 340, the
Zoning Ordinance. by establishing. Article I4D, the Urban Reserve Overlay
Zone.
ORDINANCE NO. 961
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 3-92,
ESTABLISHING ARTICLE 14D, OF ORDINANCE 340, THE ZONING ORDINANCE,
TO BE KNOWN AS THE URBAN RESERVE OVERLAY ZONE
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by: Seconded hy: to approve consent calendar items 5.1.
through 5.10 and adopt Ordinance No. )5Y1 through 96l, and adopt Resolution No.
6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS
7.1 Park Hill Bid Award - McNahh
RECOMMENDATION: Award contract for die construction of Domestic
Water Well No. 28 ❑nd related improvements he awarded McCalla, Division of
Layne, Inc. in the amount of .$75U, 354.t)O.
8,0 MAYOR/ COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
9.0 CLOSED SESSION
9.1 Update on Assessment District 87- I Foreclosures
Pursuant to Government Code for Pending liti tttinn.
IO,t} ADJOURNMENT
Motion hy: Seconded by: Action: to adjourn. Vote:
I. Maurice Armstcr, do hereby certify that I caused to he posted the I reejoin,2 :t enda this
31st day of July, 1992, as required by law.
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
4
AGENDA 3 -
EAGLE 1OUNTAIN
L A N D F I L L and It I: (; Y C L I N G CENT
July 30, 1992
Ms. Laurie Mora
Deputy City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
312 East Main Street
San Jacinto, CA 92583
Dear Ms. Mora:
This letter is to confirm that Mine Reclamation Corporation will
appear before the city council of San Jacinto on August 4, 1992
at 7:30 p.m.
i will give a brief 15 minute overview of the Eagle Mountain
Landfill and Recycling Center Project. Issues regarding the
environment, economic benefits and transportation will be
covered. After the presentation, I will answer any questions the
council and/or staff might have.
As per your telephone conversation with Kitty LaValle on
Thursday, July 30, this original letter and 25 information
packets will be delivered via Federal -Express.
Thank you for all of your assistance.
Sincerely,
40-A
00
Michael McCartney
Vice President of
Transportation and Logistics
MM:kjl
Enclosures
cc:
city council and staff
The Jones Agency
MINE RECLAMATION
CORPORATION
E0•d Wd9T:6 MET '0E 7f1f
I SAN GA13171EL VALLEY
3179 Temple Ave,. Suite 290
Pomona, CA 91768
(714) 595-6365
FAX (714) 595.2399
(800) 253.0597
COACHELLA VALLEY
960 Tehquilz Canyon Way, Su(Ie 204
Palm Springs, CA 92262
(819) 778-5131
FAX (619) 778-5144
I ; EAGLE MOUNTAIN
P.O. Box 8
Deeett Center, CA 92239
(6191 392-4308
FAX (819) 392-8101
:01 N0I1C1Ad703a 3NIW:WOa3
STAFF REPORT AGENDA..
DATE: August 4, 1992
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk
SUBJECT: Minutes of Regular Meeting of July 7, 1992
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes of the Reituiar Meeting or of July 7, 1992, as
presented.
MINUTES
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
2.0
3,11
July 7, 1992
The Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by
Mayor Boykin at We Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, California.
Present,
Councilmembers Ford, Hafliger, Leahy, Richards and Mayor
Boykin
Absent: None
A Moment of Silence was observed for Reflection
The Pledge of Alle2iance was led by Mayor Boykin
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
None
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
3.1 Employee, of the Ouarter
Mayor Boykin presented recoLmition to Debi Caskey for the First Quarter and
Alex Garcia for the Second Quarter of 1992 as Employees of the Quarter.
4.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS
Linda Mercies, voiced concern regarding the Rancho San Jacinto landscaping and the
apparent incorrect seed mixture along Esplanade at the main entrance. In addition,
concerned with the continued watering of weeds, particularly with a differing opinion on
the drought conditions.
July 7, 1992
City Manger Easter advised that stiff was working with the contractor to analyze the
situation and to determine the appropriate action. Further, the gasses arc higher than the
new growth which is just coming in. For the purposes of erosion control the watering
was necessary, even if it is not fully visible and the source of water was irrigation water
from a well on the east side of Rancho San Jacinto, not front the EMWD system. The
Public Works Director would follow up and report back to the Council at [he next
meeting.
Stephan Rebovich, voiced concern regarding businesses operating improperly, specifically
a location on Clover Street. Objected to the failure of such illegal businesses to pay sales
tax.
Fire Department Staffer Wilson advised that an inspection failed to turn up any evidence
of Mr. Rehovich's complaints.
Frank Ogg, voiced concern regarding the weeds along Los Rosas and the possibility of
a fire hazard.
Fire Department Staffer Wilson advised that the process of abatement was ongoing.
Explained that some delays result from absent owners, changes in ownership and requests
for extensions. Felt the earliest that problems would he addressed would he July 15th,
with some work having already begun.
D. Raul Wilson was not present speak.
5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR
Staff requested that item 5. I he removed from the consent calendar and be brought back
at the next meeting.
A MO"!'ION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Council member Hafliger
to continue item 5.1 to the Council meeting of July 21, 1992. Motion carried on a 5-0
vole.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember Ford, to
approve [he consent calendar as presented, except items 5.1 (being continued to 7/21/92)
and item 5.5 being pulled for separate action. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote.
5.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 16, 1992
Approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 16, 1992 as presented.
July 7, 1992
5.2 Warrant Register
Approved Warrant No. 28947 through 29182 dated June 30, [992 in the amount
of $511,050.52 and payroll check numbers 20107 through 30213 in the amount
of $188,121.15 dated June 19 and July 1, 1992.
5.3 May 1992 Treasurers' Report
Received and filed
5.4 Claim - Greiner. Larry - 1S 92-19
Rejected Claim as recommended by the Claims Adjustor pursuant to
Government Code.
5.6 Agreement to Install Public Improvements and to Widen Hewitt Street
Approved the agreement with Cecilia S. Parts for the future widening and street
_
improvements along 2179 Hewitt Street.
5.7 Agreement for Future Widening and Installation of Curb. Gutter, Sidewalk, and
Street Improvements at 625 ldyllwild Drive
Approved the agreement with William and Rita Simpson for the future
widening and the installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalk and street pavement
along 625 Idyllwild Drive.
5.8 Agreement. for Future Widening anti Installation of Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, and
Street Improvements at 1675 State Street
Approved the agreement with Robertson's Ready Mix, Inc. for future widening
and the installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalk and street pavement at 1675
State Street.
5,9 Agreement for Seventh Street Water Main Reimbursement - (Jamie and Dawne
M. Tiscarino)
Location: Seventh Street from Grand Avenue to Slate Street
Approved the Developer's request for the reimbursement of the main water line
they installed in Seventh Street and the State of Recapture.
5.10 Fees associated with Vietnamese Pot Bellied Pigs
Adopted Resolution No. 2048 establishing fees and permit costs for animal
control services pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance 953.
RESOLUTION NO. 2048
A RESOLUTION OF TILE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
ESTABLISHING FEES AND PERMIT COST FOR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE 953 AND REPEALING
RESOLUTION NO. 1890
July 7, 1992
5.11 1992/93 Contract for Title 111 Funds
Approved contract with the Riverside County Office on Aging for the fiscal
year 1992-93.
ITEM REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION:
5.5 CUP 2-92 Recycling Project - (Dave Shoppe)
Location: 650 W. Esplanade Ave.
Community Development Director McNabb, in response to Council inquiries,
advised that their options were to approve subject to the conditions or pull and
set the matter for a public hearing.
City Attorney Cox further advised that an amendment to the conditions would
require concurrence from the applicant or must schedule for a public hearing.
Some Council concern was voiced regarding the unlimited term of the permit
and suggested a 3-5 year limitation, to provide the city leverage to enforce
compliance of any violations because of the difficulty to mitigate violations,
and generally approving the proposal for the life of the property, particularly
with the future goal of that corridor as a prime industrial area.
Staff advised that a limitation would necessitate the applicant reapply and go
through the entire process again at the and of the Lime limitation.
Mr. Shoppe, although not in favor of such a restriction, would be agreeable to a
5 year limit and would work with the City on that basis.
Council concern expressed that a business needs the time to amortize
equipment and such limitations would not he cost productive, and that there are
other remedies for securing compliance.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Hafliger, seconded by
Councilmernher Richards to ratify We Planning Commission approval of C.U.P.
2-92 as conditioned. Motion carried on a 3-2 vote with Councilmember Leahy
and Mayor Boykin dissenting.
PUBLIC COMMENTS (Continued)
D. Raul Wilson, representing the Mexican -American Coalition, expressed concern
regarding the lack of youth activities in the area. Further stated the City was not
responding to the youth, lacked an affirmative action plan and had a disproportionate
ethnic employment. Suggested that some RDA funding he utilized for the support of
the youth. Suggested that businesses relocating in the area were hurting small
July 7, 1992
businesses and reducing youth employment opportunities.
Mayor Boykin advised Mr. Wilson that San Jacinto had a Latino Organization, and a
representative was in the audience, Further, that the whole valley had organized to
face the gang problems, that three teen centers had been developed in the past year,
and bus service was being provided the bowling centers and the fitness center for all,
and nut just to the ethnic groups.
Cecilia Garcia, representing the Latino Conciliatory and a 37 year resident, advised
That they had been working with the City and the youth of both Hemet and San
Jacinto, to unite. Suggested that Mr, Wilson work with them regarding his concerns.
Advised of the boxing clubs in the area and would he meeting in August, the City
celebrates Cinco De Mayo, and the additional teen centers with the assistance of the
City.
6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
6.1
Concordia Homes - Continued from 6/2/92
Location: South of Commonwealth Avenue, between Arrovo Viejo and Van
Fleet Drive, within Rancho San Jacinto Specific Plan
Community Development Director McNahh gave a brief stall' report, as on file.
Advised drat three meetings had been held with the developer and residents to
address resident's concerns. The first was so the developer could understand
the position of residents, the second to review the options for Concordia, and
the third the hear a proposal.
Concordia intended to drop the small unit and replace it with a 1566 square
foot unit. Residents seemed to he favorable to that model but still were
concerned with lack the of a 3 cur garage, which Concordia agreed to on larger
units. Overall the mix would he around 30% Plan 2, 30% Plan 3 and 40%
Plan 4 and they would alter the mix as the market changed. For compatibility
north of Commonwealth, there would he three cargarages and two story units,
and one story units with high pitch roofs to appear larger. Of the 19 lots
facing the Constellation Homes, four would he the smaller unit, six Plan 3 and
9 Plan. With regard to the questions on whether the protect was capable of
financing the Mello Roos, advised it could. Could repeat in Phase II, and
Concordia was willing to revise the development agreement only for Phase II
and come up with some statements and minimum square footages.
July 7, 1992
Staff advised that Phase I could experience this, depending upon how they
weather the economy. Each developer would have to do an analysis on a case
by case basis. Recommended also, that Council could direct stall' to begin a
study and preparation of a compatibility ordinance which would define
parameters for developer to follow, setting minimum and maximum square
footages in the area.
Staff further advised that the noticing. had been done in the form of a multi
notice for a number of proposals. Beginning September there would be single
project notices to assure better public understanding and if feasible, to post
signs along streets to advise residents a proposal is pending at that site. If it is
the desire of the City to increase the minimum unit square footage, suggested
that an exemption he considered for senior housing. Some factors cannot be
controlled by the City, such as architecture and pricing and sizing only
somewhat.
Mayor Boykin opened the public
earn
0r
Don Underwood, Concordia Homes, thanked all fur the opportunity to
understand the opposition and advised they had made revisions in mitigate most
of the concerns. Would he available for questions. In response to Council
inquiry, advised that pricing had been established. Further that the home price
reflects the offset by the tax burden by the Mello Roos.
Dave Cott ngton, Peacock Radakcr, advised that they would address the overall
development plan prior to the next tract of the next phase with more
consistency with the overall plan. Proposed to increase unit size when the
economy turns around.
Linda Mercies, stated that her purchase was based upon the expectation of a
master planned community and agreed to the Mello Roos tax because the
advantages which outweighed the cost. Noted one situation after another, truck
routes, landscaping and now the downsizing of adjacent units. Urged the
Council not to approve the proposal and expect the developer to live up to the
original concept.
Carol Jarnutowski, expressed support for the Concordia proposal, stating the
developer had tried to meet the concerns of residents by increasing the unit
size, changing the elevations and adding three car garages. Urged that a 30
day deadline he placed on Phase II of Rancho San Jacinto.
July 7, 1992
Ed Novak, Project Architect, advised that not all had the opportunity to view
the newly proposed plans and presented them for review, In response to
Council inquiry, advised that of the units facing Commonwealth, only Plan 4
would have three car garages, there would be additions to the street scape and a
variety of elevations.
Rick Thomsen, Reorganized Homeowners Board, advised that they had elected
to present the position they agreed on, however was unable to later obtain a
consensus. They were encouraged by Concordia's latest proposal and urged the
City to amend the minimum average unit size before any further developments
are approved, Personally he felt that all residents had been involved in the
meetings and there was an overall consensus that Concordia had worked in
good faith to address the resident's concerns, especially without having had the
opportunity to present testimony at the Planning Commission hearing, While it
may not address every concern, with such a wide variance of opinions, but the
effort to address resident's concerns had been afforded. Also stated that the
City Council had an obligation to protect the welfare of citizens, and the
development of a master planned community to serve as a prototype for other
developments. Stated that the issues of resident's financial investment, the
possibility of increased rental units, and the reduction of unit size being
precedent setting, arc not new or unusual concerns. The commitment of the
planned community development was implied and should he addressed.
Requested a minimum iiverage size home in the master plan, supported the
development of an ordinance and to proceed as quickly as possible. with a
minimum of 1700 square feet at ultimate build out of the tract, and to continue
the proposal until completed.
Stacy Hunter, thanked the City and Concordia for the opportunity to address
the concerns of residents. However, felt the modifications had not come far
enough to fit Ole master plan concept and the City would be accepting,
something with less vision. Residents invested based on the concept marketed
for the some size, price and quality. Even with the proposed changes making it
better, the smaller units would leopardizt,i the investment in the community.
Residents were previously led to believe that Phase II would mirror Phase I.
Downsizing, to he acceptable should he no more than 1)) percent with a
minimum square footage of 17-1800 square feet. On the foregoing basis,
supported development and quickly. Urged the Council not to consider quick
fixes for economic conditions. Handed out a copy of an ad from the LA Times
which was contrary to what was being stated.
July 7, 1992
Jim Smedley, stated Mr. Cottin,eton had said he would rather see no
construction than to see smaller units. Advised lie would prefer this amended
project to nothing. Felt the developer had gone as far as he could on
compromise. Suggested the City consider appointing a Project Coordinator and
recommended that appointment he Stacy Hunter in a part time position to he
funded from the Mello Roos, to assure residents of being informed on what
would be going on.
Virgal Woolfolk, submitted a letter to the Council (to be included in the
original agenda packet), which read in part, that the issue was not how much
the developers had compromised, but rather compliance with CEQA,
compatibility with the existing, and the failure to notify residents.
Dianne Terry, objected to the size of units proposed and the lack of
compatibility with the existing. Concerned that values will be decreased
Robert Hunter, stated he echoed the concerns previously stated in opposition to
the proposal. Further, did not understand why the tract was divided away from
the others in the amended development agreement. Suggested that Phase II be
looked at as a whole. Phase II offered no cohesiveness and did not relate to
Phase I in any way.
G.V. Salts, Secretary Homeowners Association Committee, inquired if
Concordia downsize units were intended to meet the entire city criteria for low
income housing which is mandated, and if so, it could he done more creatively?
Outlined the following concerns:
1) Inquired who would he responsible if there is a short fall when
Phase I and II are complete, and if it would be the homeowner,
it should he studied and some answers given.
2) Not in support of hiding housing behind block walls.
3) Downsizing would result in units, on the average of 24% less.
4) Lack of public notification.
5) Issues should have, been dealt with at the Planning level
6) Need for community review on how the debt service would be
addressed, showing the numbers and formulas.
7) Speed up the time for mandating minimum square footages and
enforce on Concordia,
8) Architectural Issues:
A. Flat concrete tile (s and mission existing).
B. Masonite sideboard (existing stucco) giving
increased maintenance and life expectancy.
C. North side had more mass in size..
July 7, 1992
Urged the Council deny the proposal until the City implements minimum
square footage standards or a compatibility ordinance.
Thomas Hampton, spoke in opposition to the proposal and supported the
statements of Stacy Hunter and the other residents.
Mike Caldwell, was impressed with the research, findings, and statements by
residents. Felt there was not much more he could add. Found Mr. Cottington
and the proposal over the past weeks to be very favorable and was still in favor
but did not envy the Council decision.
Carla Kayes, agreed with previous speakers opposed to the proposal. As a
buyer supported the Mellon Roos for the purpose of maintaining a high quality
and compatibility of the exiting area in Phase 11.
Mark Barron, stated lie Felt the same as Stacy Hunter, and works two jobs to
afford the quality of the master planned community and suggested the proposal
he delayed until minimum square footage was addressed in a compatibility
ordinance.
Pat Williams. felt that We developer had come a long way in resolving issues,
however, had fallen short. Presently close to eliminating smaller units and need
three car gara,!es. The unusual thing is that the opposition is not a no growth,
but rattler a desire for improving the community. Suggested that the
development be looked :it as a whole and not tract by tract. Urged the Council
to look further down the road, years from now, at the impact an the community
overall.
Gloria Curdy, stated that bigger and better was not the issue, rather quality.
Wanted to see comparable type roofs, garage doors, etc. The quality of the
unit determines the price, and smaller plus less cost would bring down adjacent
property values.
Ed Novak, .Applicant's Architect, stated that the quality of the project was
proposed. such as the flat concrete tile root', if quality equates with cost, then
the proposed roofs cost more than the existing. Advised the proposed project
would have wood siding (costing more than stucco) which was compatible with
other area units. Further stated that quality did not equate with square footage,
smaller units have quality also.
There being no further testimony, Mayor Boykin closed the Public Hearing.
July 7, 1992
Don Underwood, in response to Council inquiry, stated they did not know how
the ad got in the LA Times and was unaware of it. Eventually in Phase II [he
square footage could go up to 2200 square feet.
Dave Cottiiieion had not seen the LA Times ad and explained that the figures
reflect what was existinil.
Suggestion from Council was to Corm a committee, including the BIA and
residents to develop a compatibility ordinance. "Timing was the draw hack, an
example cited was Moreno Valley, whose committee was formed in September,
1991, and adoption was February, 1992.
In response to Council, staff advised that they could make modifications,
subject to specific findings.
In response to Council, Mr. Underwood explained the number of units per tract,
which did not relate Li this specific tract under consideration. Theo ultimate
build out of the phase would he I 1 7 units with square lamaec.s raneine from
1231-156I) :uid higher in adjacent tracts.
A MOTION was made by Couneilmember Richards to approve the
comprehensive development plan as recommended by staff with the
modification to include 3 floor plans for square footages; 1396, 156() and one
to he presented between 1700- I RIIO. Motion failed for lack of a second.
A MOTION was node by Council member Fort!, seconded by C,lunstilmemhe.r
Halliger to approve the proposal as presented by Concordia homes. Motion
carried on a 3-2 vote with Councilnlembcr Richards and Mayor Boykin
dissenting.
At the hour of 9:37 P.M. the Council recessed.
At the hour or 9:5O P.M. the Council reconvened with all members present.
6.2 U.K. Assncaale.s - Public Comment;
City Attorney Cox gave a brief report on the history of the ne" otiations and the
impacts of state legislation. Negotiations had been oceurrin!ii for sonic time
regarding the AB 939 requirements for recycling. The roles had been the
lowest in the inland Empire and Southern California. The neOotialiims include
provision for upgrade equipment and to increase city revenues. The contract
terms would be for seven years, with automatic renewal for seven years and
can he terminated without cause. The city would be allowed to negotiate with
others for recycling. First, the city
July 7, 1992
would he looking to cooperate in a program with the City of Hemet, contract
with Goodwill industries, or with OK Associates. Rates would be subject to an
annual CP1 increases, except for the cap at 8% unless the CPI in one year
exceeds 10%. Included is a 4.2% consumer price adjustment for this year
under the old contract.
r Boykin called for testimony on the open public hearing.
Richard Daday, advised that staff had agreed to meet with him the next day to
address many of his questions. Thanked the staff for all their cooperation.
Spoke in favor of keeping two day per week pickups.
Epi Landin, was happy with the services of OK Associates.
Leo Marquez, happy with service and preferred two day a week pick up.
Advised that OK Associates even comes out if a resident forgets to put there
trash oat.
Gregano Villarino, needed an interpreter to speak.
Interpreter, Cecilia Garcia, stated he was happy working for OK Associates and
had a very nice boss, wish he could work longer with them.
Salvador Villarino, also using an interpreter.
Interpreter Ceciha Garcia stated he works for the same company and thinks the
work they do is the best, real pleased with his boss also.
Jose Jaramillu stated he was very pleased working for OK Associates. The
interpreter stated he serviced her home and did a very nice job.
Jacinto Marquez, was happy with the service provided throughout the years.
Felt the small disputes were better than working for another company.
Efrain Cruz was not present to speak.
R. J. Stevens, stated that. in 4i) years OK Associates had been the best
contractor. Further stated that the contract negotiated was heater than any when
he was on the Council.
Pauline Berrotertm, was very pleased with OK Associates, and stated that had
been very kind during Fier Ito hands illness.
July 7, 1992
Lucille Ferguson, commended OK Associates for a fine job. With their
services there is less debris on the roads, and supported twice a week pick up.
A MOTION was made by Cauncilmember Leahy, seconded by
Councilmernher Ford to continue this matter to the meeting* of July 21, 1992
for further consideration. Motion curried on a 5-0 vote.
6.3 Environmental Impact Assessment and Vesting Tentative Tract 25738.
Amendment No. I and Amended Development Plan
Location: South of Seventh St. and Easterly of Ramona Expressway
Community Development Director McNahh gave a brief report as on file with
the original agenda packet. Briefly outlined the recreation and open space.
Stated We development of the plan would be based upon a marketing study.
Some confusion exists regarding the school mitigation fees which would have
to he worked out with the school district. Civil code shows die senior projects
are exempt from Mello Roos tax.
Mayor Boykin opened the Public Hea
Harry Bingham, applicant, advised that the development came before the council
some time ago with two separate recreational facilities and when it was
approved an added condition to agree to restrict. He felt it was more
appropriate to make recreation more in line with the seniors of today, and
provide 2 tennis courts, a spa and pool, dance floor, lounge, kitchen, craft
room. exercise room, billiard roam, office and deck overlooking the water
scape with a largo pond and rock waterfall with a trailing brook (thanks to
EMWD and the use of reclaimed water). RV parking would he complete in the
last phase and a second emergency exit (break away gates), next to Seventh
Street property and one midway in the project with the second phase. RV
storage to he controlled by the Homeowners Assn. Units would he small
quality homes, not stripped houses, between 1055 and 1560 square feet, May
come hack with a 5th floor plan between 1 100 and 1400. Hoped to begin in 4-
5 months after obtaining a joint venture partner. Much like Concordia, due to
the market need smaller units to he competitive with a slow absorption rate,
In response io Council, Mr. Bighuni advised that senior housing sales were
slow but steady. The project would not he conducive to families. Advised
there would he 2t) loot landscape strip between the Expressway and the wall.
The wall would be a minimum 6 foot, maybe two loot wall with a 2-3 foot
berm for sound mitigation, with a wall staggered and decorative with
July 7, 1992
clustered landscaping. The entire project would he walled and security gates at
the front, with the levy acting as a natural harrier. The RV storage would not
provide space for all hut would take care of the predominate number.
Virgal Woolfolk spoke in support of this type of project and indicated a need
for more of them. However, voiced concern that it he placed somewhere else,
current location was too close to a major earthquake area.
Mayor Boykin clarified that the location was a difficult piece of property.
Further, building was limited to 50 feet from a fault.
There being no further testimony, Mayor Boykin closed the public hearing.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by
Councilmember Ford, to approve tract 25738 (Amendment No. 1), and the
corresponding Development Plan subject to the Findings of Fact and conditions
of Approval. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote.
7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS
7.1 Environmental Impact Report for .Annexation 66. General Plan Amendment. 2-
91, and Change of Zone 3-91 - McNahh
Location: West of Sanderson Avenue to the ridgeline of The Lakeview
Mountains, North of Espl:made. Avenue to the San Jacinto River
North of the Ramona Expressway
Councilmemher I Hi tiger declared a conflict of interest and left the Council
chambers at the hour of IU:35 P.M.
Community Development Director McNabb regtest'd .np� from Council on
issues to he addressed. Advised that the25,000 t {;""p1�t?jected was the
worse case scenario it was a net figure which would be reduced for
infrastructure.
Councilmember Leahy requested that child care and car pool park and ride be
addressed. Further, stated that police and fire protection would he implemented
immediately upon annexation.
Councilmember Richards submitted his written comments for the record and
requested including in the final EIR.
July 7, 1992
Vireal Woollolk voiced concern regardin! the proposed residential areas near
treatment plant, the placement of a school near the reservoir and the traffic
impacts on the Expressway.
City Manager Easter advised that .staff was working with FMWD to do
buffering around the treatment plant with additional green space.
Staff advised that no action was necessary.
LLMD Assessment Collections - Vega
,1 MOTION was made by Councilnhenhher Leahy, seconded by
Councilmember Richards, to receive and file. Motion carried on a 4-(J vote
with Councilmember Ha(liger absent.
At the hour of 10:45 RM. Councilmember Haflitger returned to Council chambers.
Police Dcnartment Hirli we Practice Review - Easter
City Manaeler Easter advised that stall. had been with the Labor Attorney to
complete a study. A report would come hack to the Council in 0-45 days.
Stressed the need to keep litigation information in confidential. Encouraged
input from citizens during the process and report hack and if it adequately
addresses would request implementation. If additional review is needed then
the city could proceed with an outside consultant to evaluate the situation.
In response to Council, advised that citizens could provide wrilten iliptit on the
officer profile. The second part of the process would he for a community
group to meet with the Counseling Team to make decisions on the profile.
Staff would he happy to meet with the Public Safety Subcommittee to review
the process. Advised that the Counseling Team worked on evaluations for the
Police and Fire Department employees. With regard to costs, conference calls
would he utilized to he most cost effective so tom! as it does not short chantte
the study. Staff would work with the news media to communicate with the
citizens and encourage attendance to obtain input.
Clarification was made Mai the process would not waste time on looking at
what was done in the past, but rather what the current processes were and this
would not he a "witch hunt". looking an specific individuals. The looking at of
past practices would serve only to help the community understand the statutory
requirements in recruiting police officers. the laws of minimum procedures,
liackgronnd checking, and psychological tests. Further, the review of past
practice did not imply anything was wrong.
July 7, 1992
Chief Kozma that POST reviews annually, not just to meet, nut exceed
standards, and shows where and how to improve on the system.
Art Sheppard, stated he felt a review of the past would show practices where
some may have engaged in inappropriate activities. Participated in a panel 1'or
entry level police officers and hoped that practice would be come a permanent
feature.
City Manager Easter advised that the completed report would make
recommendations. Hoped to utilize the community panel aspect, heard many
positive things about it.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Ford, seconded by Cnuncilmember
Hafliger, to Approve the recommended approach and direct staff to proceed
with the study. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote.
7.4 Update on Estudillo Mansion - Easter
Received Oral Report
City Manager Easter advised of all the activity taking place and the meetings to
resolve the issue. Mrs. Ellitot was supportive of staff trying to find financing.
Contacted the County Historian '.vlm recommended Wayne Donaldson,
Historical Architect evaluate next week and make recommendations to brine the
mine up to standards. Also contacted state and FEMA and would he meeting
tomorrow. One issue was getting the house designated as a landmark through
the city or county, and of course stale and federal processes. Some concern
regarding the strings attached The preliminary cost would he $1,300 and for the
additional steps an REP would he prepared. Local groups arc being contacted
for assistance.
The situation changes daily and stall would keep Council posted. Need to
know all the ramifications of the designation. All alternatives would be
examined.
Council voiced siune concerns with expending funds with no hope of salvaging,
or being excessively costly to .salvage. Also concerned regarding higher
priority items. Lastly. the concern of expending financial assistance to a
private held property with no public access.
Conrsensus of the Council not to fund further effort.
July 7, 1992
8.0 MAYOR/ COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
Councilmemher Hallier requested that staff he directed to process a compati
ordinance.
Hearing no objections Mayor Boykin so directed, and the possibility of nevi in2 the
Peacock Radaker agreement to comply with the ordinance and amend We development
agreement for Phase II, both to he concurrent. Addressini* both upscaling and
downscaling. Not just tracts, but also master planned communities. Hold special
meetings early on to include the community input.
Mayor Boykin requested stal l' look at the Ion*atities of tape recording meeting*s and
bring hack to Council.
Councilmemher Richards concurred with Mayor Boykin and rettueste.d something he
done with the microphones.
i4l,tvor Boykin advised the Annual Distineuishcd Citizen Dinner by the Boy Scouts of
America would he on July 23 at the National Uran.e Show, tickets S.100.
9,0 CLOSED SESSION
None
10.0 ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business A MOTION was made by Councilmemher Ford,
seconded by Councilmemher Leahy, to adjourn. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote. The
hour of adjournment heir« 11:35 P.M.
Submitted by Approved by
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
Francis R. Boykin, Mayor
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 4, 1992
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk
SUBJECT: Minutes of Special Joint Meeting of
u l.y
4, 1992
AGENDA
RECOMMENDATION: -Approve the minutes of the Special Joint Meeting of July 14,
1992, as presented.
MINUTES
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE
CITY COUNCIL SI FI ING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AND THE SAN JACINTO PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 14, 1992
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
The Special Joint Meeting was called to order at 6:30 P.M. by Mayor Boykin at the
Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, California.
Present: Councilmembers Ford, lialliger, Leahy, Richards & Mayor Boykin
Commissioners Rutledge, Taylor and Chairman Ver Plank
Absent: Commissioners Iacono and Hixson
2.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
None
3.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
Raymond Hatter from OES, and representing FEMA, advised of the disaster application
center to he held the upcoming Friday We 17th, from 1pm-7pm and on the 18th from
10am-6pm. They had been canvassing We area and advising residents and business
owners that assistance was available from state and federal. Distributed flyers and
brochures and wanted to get the word out that assistance was in the community.
Councilmember Leahy suggested the use of radio stations.
4.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS
None
5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Halliger, seconded by Councilmember Leahy
to approve the consent calendar as presented. Motion carried on a 5-0 vole.
July 14, 1992
5.1 Riverside County Library Advisory Committee - Vacancy
Accepted the resignation of Jeanette Hofmann and declared a vacancy.
Council consensus to send a letter or certificate of appreciation.
5.2 Award Police Car Bid
Approved the purchase of five 1992 Chevrolet Police Vehicles from Maurice J.
Sopp & Son at a cost not to exceed $72,634.28, under a Los Angeles County bid.
5.3 Designation of Applicant's Agent Resolution
Adopted Resolution No. 2049, titled "Designation of Applicant's Agent
Resolution" authorizing certain City employees to execute the application for
disaster relief assistance.
6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
6.1 Environmental Impact Report - Annexation #66 - General Plan Amendment #2-91
and Change of Zone 3-91 - (Continued from May 26, 199'21
Located vvest of Sanderson Avenue in the ridgy.eline of the Lakeview Mountains,
north of Esplanade Avenue to the San Jacinto River nc.rth of the Ramona
Expressway
Councilmemher Hafliger declared a conflict of interest and left the Council
chambers at the hour of 6:40 P.M.
Staff clarified that the matter had been continued by the Planning Commission
from their meeting of June 16, 1992 and continued from the City Council meeting
of May 26, 1992.
Community Development Director McNahh gave a brief report outlining the
various hearings conducted. The purpose was to review and accept comments on
the draft FIR. The Planning Commission received no public testimony and the
hearing was closed and staff directed to prepare the final EIR, which was not
subject to Planning Commission review. The hearing for the zoning was
continued. Following the public hearing an action would he necessary to certify
the EIR and determine consistency, requiring a ten day notice.. The. General Plan
Amendment and the Zoning have no changes and have hen recommended for
approval. The zoning and General Plan are pursuant to the existing ranges of
density allowed. The EIR utilizes the worse possible case with upper range
densities of about 25,00t) units, however, the zoning implemented in the General
Plan would not allow 25,000 hut rather ahout
7
July 14, 1992
9,000 units. When development occurs, other streets \vould have, to be developed
and approximately 20% of the land would he lost for streets and would more
likely be 15,000 units. NBS Lowry was available for questions.
In response to Council, staff advised it would not he feasible or appropriate at the
time to reduce the figures clue to CEQA requirements. The approval of item 6.2
on the agenda would have no hearing on this item. Some RA rather than R 4 &
5 have been designated along the north side of Esplanade Avenue. The draft EIR
addressed the concerns stated in the EMWD letter.
In response to Commissioners, staff advised that at build out waters would be
addressed by working down stream to up stream and each property owner would
share with development plans. Infrastructure planning now for the area and after
an analysis could look at bond issues for flood control channels for the northwest
plan. Each project would he reviewed with the EIR in mind and eo through the
environmental process of the land usc element of the General Plan. If not
adequately addressed a supplemental would he prepared.
Peter 0(1m-1J:rails, EMWD, appreciated the opportunity to present information
which compliments the project presented which surrounds tl.e EMWD
Reminded that it would be helpful to he familiar with the reclamation facility and
offered a tour.
Roger Turner, EMWD Planner, presented an overview of some concerns related
to the General Plan amendment, zoning and annexation process. Prepared a
written statement which was distributed. Focused on physical, land use
(development) and the impact on air quality not noted in the handout. Stated
objections as submitted in writing. Suggested the transfer of densities to help
mitigate or buffer adjacent areas. Suggested buffering with commercial, light
manufacturing or natural harriers, as in other locations. In response to Council
advised that puhlic disclosure was required on any development within 1/4 mile
pursuant to their Ordinance 66.
Mr. McNabb, in response to Council, advised that comments had been forwarded
to the EIR consultant and mitigation for development would he written into the
General Plan, including recommendations for buffering. Density transfers were
options of the Planning Commission and City Council as development occurred.
13
July 14, 1992
Varying Council concerns regarding the deciding on the entire project for the next
several years for the whole of annexation 66. The process of amendment would
he available for chauiees.
Staff advised that mitigative measures could be implemented when the plans come
for approval. Council would have the option of, approving or modifying at the
time of final approval.
John Schouten, Chairman of the Annex 66 Property Owners, spoke in support of
annexation with 66% signed consent representing 85% of the total land, with
additional consent to he acquired prior to LAFCO hearings. All considerations
had been discussed for the pass two years, including the protection of agriculture
land and a buffer for transition. There would he phasing of development and
homeowner notification. Owners concurred with the worse case scenario and felt
15,000 units was more realistic. Provision was made for an -overabundance of
open space with over 22% designated open space. Great opportunity for master
planning rather than incremental development. Urged Council approval as
proposed.
Clayton Record, NBS Lowry, suggested that Council keep in mind that as
technology improves many issues would he addressed by underground basins to
alleviate the down stream problems, EMWD was now working in coordination
with the City on the development plan with added expertise, and the annexation
is already one year beyond the original estimated time to he heard before LAFCO
and needs to move forward by August. Property owners have patiently awaited
completion and could not withstand additional delays, the cost to continue to look
at new ideas was prohibitive.
Sue Gray, NBS Lowry, advised that when originally presented to EMWD they
agreed. The discussions to realign Highway 79 could he addressed later, which
had just been brought up. Park and open space had been included and additional,
landscaping fur buffering. The area of Warren and Sanderson must he a specific
plan which would allow transfer of densities and land use plans for that area,
possibly a golf course.
In response to Council, Ms. Gray advised the previously the sewage processing
was not a part of the discussions. However the opportunity remains to fine tune
and cannot predict whether LAFCO would require that.
4
14, 1992
Robert dies ,stated he supported the annexation and paid tTs\tn- to process.
Sonic h �w is arcel fell through the cracks and parcel at Seventh- <<nd Sanderson
2
would binstead of an R-2. Requested an additional 600 feet on the south
side of Sanderson he included otherwise there would be the cost of $2-5,000 for
a zone change later. Voiced concern regarding the location of schools in the
General Plan, where elementary school attendees would have to cross the highway.
Consensus of the Planning Commission and the City Council to make the C-2
designation on all four corners of the intersection of Warren and Seventh.
The Planning Commission reopened the public hearing and there was no further
testimony to he presented so the hearing was closed.
A MOTION was made by Commissioner Rutledge, seconded by Commissioner
Taylor to increase the boundary to include the Jones property subject —to, the
findings of fact for Annexation #66 and the General Plan Amendment 2-91.
Motion carried on a 3-0 vote with Commissioners Iacono and Hixson absent.
A MOTION was made by Commissioner Taylor, seconded by Commissioner
RullcdLle to grant the request of Mr. Jones for the 10 acre corner as C-2
designation at the southwest and northwest to make all four corners C-2 and
amend the General Plan map and approve the change of zone 3-91 subject to the
findings of fact.
Sec Council action under item 5.1i
Consensus to move to Section 8.0 of the agenda.
R.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER/PLANNING COMMISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
In response to Commissioner concern, City Manager Easter advised that part of the
formation of the landscape maintenance district, a bid was obtained for the maintenance
of open ditches and storm drains in Rancho San Jacinto. The Public Works Director
would prepare a report on the costs for the Commission and Council.
Councilmemher Leahy requested Councilmemher Halliger be notified to rejoin the
meeting.
Mayor Boykin suggested they finish the comments before them.
5
July 14, 1992
A MOTION was made by Commissioner Taylor, seconded by Commissioner Rutledge
to adjourn. :Motion carried on a 3-0 vote with Commissioners Iacono and Hixson absent.
The hour of adjournment being 8:05 P.M.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Ford, seconded by Councilmember Leahy to
continue item 6.1 to a special meeting of July 28, 1992. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote
with Councilmember Hafliger absent.
6.2 Environmental Impact Assessment and General Plan Amendment 2-91
Councilmember Halliger returned to the Council chambers.
Community Development Director McNabb presented a brief report and explained
the change in density and eliminate PUD bonus densities. The Planning
Commission recommended changing the General Plan to modify densities, and
advised that the maximum can be set less than 40 to be consistent. Recommended
that the Council defer action to a later date.
Mayor Boykin opened the public hearing, there being no testimony to present the
hearing was closed.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember
Ford to continue the matter to July 28, 1992 to allow staff to come back with the
maximum on high density. Motion carried on a 5-I) vote.
MOTION was an -tended to set the maximum on high density at 25. Motion
approved on a consensus.
At the hour of 8:20 P.M. Councilmember Halliger left the Council chambers due to a conflict of
interest.
6.3 Environmental Impact Assessment and Zoning Ordinance Amendment 3-92
Community Development Director McNahh explained the urban overlay zone
concept. The concept would he available at no cost unless they withdrew from
the reserve and would allow nonconforming uses, but only those existing.
Council suggestion that notification he extended to one mile in the last paragraph
of the ordinance. In section 14.05 add no guaranteed zoning. Limitations on
number of animals should he addressed,
C,
July 14, 1992
At the hour of 8:30 P.M. City Clerk Armster left the Council chambers.
Mayor Boykin opened the public hearing, there being no testimony to present the
hearing was closed.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Ford, seconded by Councilmember
Leahy to continue this matter to the meeting of July 28, 1992 for staff to address
the limitations and advise the property owners. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with
Councilmember Hafliger absent.
6.4 Environmental Impact Assessment and Zoning Ordinance Amendment 4-92
Counci!member Hal'Hur returned to the Council chambers.
Community Development Director McNabb advised the proposed action would
amend the zone to allow for buffering from larger to smaller lots, and those
lots 21,000 or larger could have animals.
Mayor Boykin opened the public hearing, there hein no testimony to present the
hearing was closed.
A MOTION Wus made by Councilmember Leahy -seconded by Councilmember
Rhanls to ware the reading of Ordinance/No. 957 ,,and waive full reading and
r. ad by title on'y and direct staff to brinAznack an arnendment to allow animals
rp lots 2'6.000 or lartJer. Motion carriedion a '-vote! with Councilmember Ford
SSLffill12.
ORDINANCE NO) 957
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COU L OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 4-92, AMENDING ARTICLE 5,
SECTION 507 OF ORDINANCE 340, THE ZONING ORDINANCE
RELATED TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF' VARIABLE LOT SIZES IN
THE R-I (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE
6.5 Environmental Impact Assessment and Subdivision Ordinance Amendment 1-92
Community Development Director McNabb advised that the proposal would set
minimum lot widths and depths based upon relationship of size. Minimum width
to he 50%, of depth.
7
July 14, 1992
Mayor Boykin opened the public hearing, there being no testimony to present the
public hearing was closed.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded hy Councilmember
Hafliger to waive the full reading of Ordinance No. 958 and read hy title only and
introduce Ordinance No. 958. ;Motion carried on a 5-0 vote.
ORDINANCE NO. 958
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT 1-92, AMENDING CHAPTER 18 OF THE MUNICIPAL
CODE, SECTION 18-111-3.B.3 RELATED TO MINIMUM LOT
WIDTH REQUIREMENTS FOR NEWLY CREATED LOTS
7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS
None
8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER/PLANNING COMMISSION GENERAL DISCUSSION
(Continued)
Councilmember Leahy advised the Fun bus would begin the next day and run for all ages
to howling centers. theaters, skating rink beginning at 5 PM to 10 PM, Complimented
staff on the intormalion provided regarding the earthquake damage and assisting citizens.
Councilmember Halligcr advised that the Groundwater Assn. meetings were ongoing and
meeting with other agencies regarding replenishment of water and development of
necessary policies for consideration.
Councilmemher Richards requested, update on Muni -Golf.
City Manger Easter advisethc' m to review draft of phase 2 report, and would
he looking more detailed attthre reposed site and evaluate. The next step would
he to review the report wiirt(property owners at the sites to he sure of cost
estimate accuracy. The phase two process would he coming to a close near the
end of the week. One proposed site is the Westra property who participated in
funding of the phase 2 study and also EMWD was interested in the concept for
future treatment plant.
July 14, 1992
9.0 CLOSED SESSION
None
10.0 ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy,
seconded by Councilmernber Ford to adjourn. The hour of adjournment being 9:00 P.M.
Submitted by Approved by
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
9
Francis R. Boykin, Mayor
AGENDA
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance Director
Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of Register of Audited Demands
and Payroll Checks
DATE: August 4, 1992
RECOMMENDATION
Approve warrant numbers 29351 through 29477 dated July 31, 1992 in the amount
of 8 364,384.77 and payroll check numbers 20418 through 20506 in the amount of
8 92,458.61 dated July 31, 1992.
SUMMARY
A listing of accounts payable warrants is attached for your review and approval.
Payroll is available for your review in the Finance Department.
~GLCD12
CI1 y �F SA� JACI#TO
�EGI�TER OF A�DITED DEHANDS
PAGE 1
UNITED PA#K A/C 201398 DATE 7/31/92
l5SUED TO
29351* St.AN JACINTO TREASUREk
29352* SO~ CA^ 8A8
29353* SO+ CA^ EDISON
29354* DIVINE REAL ESTATE
29355* PUBLIC EMP^ ASSOC.
29336* ICMA
29357* �IVERSIDE CO. EMP~
29358: GFIREFIGHTERS ASSOE
29359* G.J^ POLICE ASSOC`
2936O* 30. 101. 8AS
29361* SO+ CA, EDISON
29362* SO~ CA^ EDISON
29363* SO. CA, GAS
�936�* SO+ CA^ EDISON
29365* 30. CA^ GAS
29366* PROFESSIONAL VIDEO
29367* SO+ CA, GAS
29368* SO. CA^ EDISON
29369� SO. CA^ GAS
2937j* S[>. WA, ^ EDISON
29371* HEAL[H NET
29372* AETNA MEALFH PLAN
73* BLUE CROSS OF SO ^ CA^
PUBLIC EMP. F?E7^ SYSTEM
29375* SO, CA` EDIS8N
29376* SO^ CA^ QAS
�9J77* 6O, CA^ EDISON
4378* WO ^ CA. GAS
2v379* U^S^ POSTMASTER
2,538O* FRANK STEENPORT
29381* GO; CA^ GAS
29382* !30` CA, EDISON
29383 DEBRA CASKEY
29384 BILL RUTLEDG[
293135 DAVIB VER PLANK
29386 YVONNE IACONO
�9If. 87 GLENN TAYLOR
29388
29209
2939O
29391
29392
29393
2?394
2939�
W9396
398
294O1
oil & T LANGUAGE LINE
AFTONS FLOWERS ANB GIFT
ALLISON ENTERPRISE
ALL PURE CHEMICAL CO,
AL,S LAW#MOWE} SHOP
ANADY'S TROPHIES
ARROW PRINTING
[^S. BABCOCK & GON8
BARRY BACKLUND
BEAUMQNT OONCRETE CO.
8OB'S LUMBER
CEWAER
9T. BOARD EQUALIZATIDN
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
�E�C�IPTIOM
REPLENISH PETTY CASH
�AfHE�T COLLECTIONS
PAYMEMT COLLECTIONS
MSHTHLY LEAGE~31� MAIN
1XES
DE�ERR[� COMP.
CREDIT UNION
ASSOCI�TION DUES
P��MENT COLLE[TIONS
PAyMENT COLLECTIONS
��y�EHT COLLECTION8
�ENT COLLECTIONS
�AYFIENT COLLECTIUNS
FAfHE-4T COLL1�CTIGNS
VIDED~DISASTER PIECE THEATRE
P�;MEHT COLLECTIONS
���HE��T COLLE�TIONS
FYHE141T COLLECTIONG
YHEHT COLL�CTIONS
HE4LTH INSURANCE
HE�LTH INSURANCE
HEALTH INSURANCE
PERS R�TIREMENT
�A�HENT C8LLECTI0NS
WY6EHT C8LLE[TIONS
F'A;HE#T COLLECTIONS
P�Y�ENT COLLECTIONS
REPLENISH! POSTAGE METER
RECERT, OPN INST��UCTOR~P.D.
�AYMEN� COLLECTIONS
P�YME�T COLLE["TIONS
REIHB. �ACKGROQND SCHOOL
PLANNING MEETIN8
F:LHNIN MEETING
FLAi �!,NI1,41G COMMISSI8N
PLANNINC MEETING
LANGUAQE LINE ... PD,
FLO�ER ARRANGEMENT
AIR FILTER^~ENGINE 201
CHLORI#E/SO[/A~WATER
PARTS —TRACTOR
LEAHY
FLYERS —DISPATCHER & R[SOURCE
1.0, TESTS. —WATER
�THI[�S �CHOOL�POST REIMB,
�E[/IMIX~P.W^
NEHSER1314I1~.K LEAHY
U�DERG�OUND TANK FEE
UNEMPLOYMENT
GUIDES
AMOUNT
84^91
541^92
1,396^2l
1O58+4O
244"24
1,O63^46
2,892^0O
250+O0
L~219.10
59943
2+161^62
2~263~42
581^98
782^47
194~14
1,000^00
396~39
879'76
177^83
616,17
17,315^07
4/250^38
33^OO
18,603^3�
315^4�
61^65
40O^T1
324^34
970^O0
1O7+25
415^79
7�7^17
39^14
1O0°O0
1OO"OO
1OO^O0
10O^OO
25^O0
46^15
259^68
2795,82
135,77
4^O4
58O+38
315°00
4O7~75
3U2.77
24^78
35.00
5O^59
2^31O^O0
�ITY F S4 JACINTO `
~GLCD12 REGISTE�� OF AUD�TED DEMANDS PAGE
CHECK
294O2
294O3
294O4
294O5
�9406
294O7
294O8
29409
2941O
29411
29412
29413
29�14
29415
29416
29417
29418
29419
2?42O
29421
29422
29423
29424
29425
29426
29427
29428
29429
�9430
29431
29432
29433
29434
29435
29436
29437
29438
29439
2944O
29441
29442
29443
29444
29445
29446
29447
29448
29449
29450
29451
29452
F�/31/92UNI
COM SER CO^
COMTRONIX OF HEHE|
COX ELECTRO
DAMON REFERENCE LAB,,
J^F+ DAVIDSON
DIAMOND VALLEY NURSEK`r
DOMlNO'S PIZZA
[ & E CARDENINQ �E�VlCE
�ASTERN MUNI^WATER DI�T
E8ERHARD EQUIPMENT RENT
EVANS TIR� CO~
FERGUSON+PRAET&GHERM��
OFELIA FlERRO
1ST MUNICIPAL DIVISIU�
GENERAL TELEpHONE Co.
TAMRA GERARD
DIANE HARDING
HEMET FENCE CO,
HE�ET HEATlNG & COULln�
HE�ET NEWS
HEMET RUBBER STAMP
HOT SHOlS J. HOUR PHOTO
HOUSING AUTHORITY
INLAND CHEVROLET
INTERNAL CONTROL
C,K, JAESCHKE INC^
JENSON
KELLY PlPE
KEIFM COHP�NlES
KENNEDY COURT k6PORT1�G
KEPHART CONSULTING SE��
LAYNE~WESTERN CO.
JAN 1_EAHY
LON8S DRUG STORE
JOE MARUF�O
LAURIE MORA
LAURIE MORA
NBS/LOWRY
NTFC
NORTON BATTERY MFG� CO,
UVERNIGHT INDUSTRI�L
PACIFlC LIGHTING
PAGENET
PARKHILL NURSERY
POST AND PARCEL "PLUS'
QUALITY TRANSMISSIONS
QUAST TREE SERVICE
RADIO SHACK
RAMONA ANIMAL HAVEN IN"C
ROADWAY SUPPLY
SAFETY^KLEEN CORP^
iESCRIPTION
�EF'AIR UNIT 163 - P+D.
�IH� �NDBS~F~D^
TE�P P[��]�-CITY YARD
L�SORATQRY FE�S-P,D.
T�AFFIC E�GINEERING
F'�RK TQ[�ES
L��DS�APE MAlNT^.... JUNE
�TILITI�S
�EHTAL DF OVERSEE[/ER
TIRES � REPAIRS
CLAIMANT1 ��IZZA
�EDICAL EXPENSE REIMB~
BRGOMS��[EPER LEASE
Pif.' HE GFR'VICES
CHAM8E� MIXER FLYER
DISPATCHER COURSE REIMB^
TEKPACILITY FENCE~P~[/^
�^C CO#PRESSOR~C~C.
L�GAL �DVERTISING
W TAMP
FILM P��OCESSIN�-F~D.
SENIQR HOME REPAZR PROGRAM
TS~�LL VEHICLE�
P�E~EMPL^ POLYGRAPHS~P^D.
PA�TS FOR MOWER
CO�P�T�, TOOL5
�lPE MATERIALS�WATER DEPT^
��HEXATION SERVICEG~
CLAIM-AI:-RNANDEZ
CLAIW. STIZZA
WELL PUMP --GRAND & BATH
REIHB� SEMINAR~I��LAND EHPIRE SUMMIT
FILM & �OLAROID-Ft. D^
GVERPAY�ENT ON W4TER METER
�ILEAGE REIMB+
MILEAGE REI'm B°
ES�LAN/\DE PR�JECT & W^ S,J^ ANNEX
TELEPHONE EQUIP` LEASE
BATTERY -UNIT
SUPPLI��~ALL DEPTS^
ST�EET LIGHTS
RENTAL �ADIO PAGERS~F.D,
TREES��OMBRA WAY
P�R�EL GERVICE-P~D~
T.::�/\NG ADJ^--UNIT 131
CUT TR,E ROOTS - BRINTON STREET
;�EPAIP INTERCOM~P^D^
A�IMALS ~ JUNE
STREET �AINT~P,W^
�EHICLE SERVICES
752^31
297~05
1^140^OO
220,92
2,1D5~0O
479.49
63^54
20O,O0
61,6l.9.50
431^00
1,4�.24
3708^DO
81^O0
1~565^25
98.14
4B~4O
121°33
15O^OO
685~0U
58~65
6O~O2
44^77
4 5
6O0,\/O
125^7l
287~12
t6O^��
".374,OO
340^O0
90O,OO
74'333^7O
15^OO
159^13
100.00
18^77,
29^90
12,O90~89
790~57
7O^04
95~46
96O~12
238,55
3~03O.00
18^20
84^44
100^SO
75~37
69
4,37���6
156.0O
^'
C'ITf OF SAN JACINTO
'GLCD12 DEMANDS PAGE
UNITED CALIFOR�I� ��NK A/C 201398 DATE 7/31/92
ISSUED TO
29453 SCOTIA TECH4DEV^
29454 SCOTShAN MANUFACTURI�6
29455 6EARS~ ROE8UCK �l CIO,
29456 SIGN CENTER
29457 SMART & FINAL
2945G SMITH AND WESSON
29459 SO. CALIFORNIA EDI8OH
'9460 SOLANO PRESS
29461 GMAC AND SOPP CHEVRULET
294�2 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL
29463 STATE MATERIALS
29464 STEVE�S AUTO PARTS
29465 SUN CONTROL PROD,
29466 SUN ELECTRIC CORP",
29467 TAABS _
-19468 TECHNICAL PROD.CORP^
29469 BILL TIBBETTS
2947O JAMIE & DAWNE TISCARIND
29471 VALLEY REGOURCE C�NTER
29472 VALLEY TEEN FOUNDATION
294?3 CARL WARREN & DU.
29474 LEROY WELTY
75 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCT
476 xEROX CORPORATION
29477 ZELLER PRINTING
DESC�IPTTON
REPAI� �ETWORK~P^D^
MOHTHLY LEASE~OFFICE~P°D~
TC3LS~W�TER DEPT^
H%EGHBD"H8OD WATCH SIGNS
SUPPLI���DISASTER KELIEF
��HUAL IDENTI~KIT RE0TAL~P^D^
UTILITI�S
REDVLP. IN CAI IF^~PUBLICATTON
5 ` 19Y2 POLICE VEHICLE5~CFD
FUEL
BLOCKS~P^D^ PARKING LOT
�EHICL� �ARTS
W'INDOW... ADM^ OFFICES
HCSE REPAIRS TO SCOPE~F`D,
��INTINC OF WATER BILLS _
l6 C��ES RED~B-GONE~'WATER
F_RTG UNIT 301~WATER
�EIMI�1"ATER LINE INSTALLATIDN
LAW� M�I#TENANCE^P^D^
GR�F�ITI REMOVAL
CLAIM� STIZZA
OVERPAY�ENT-WA�ER BILL
LTAPE CI8NS... P^W^
CG�IER [/RY I#K�C,C,
3 P�RT ICR-P~D,
AMOUNT
27O^O0
1°743^40
1U8^19
583^08
45^27
439^62
151^26
67^99
72+634^30
7,477,53
� 18,96
1O2.17
S7^50
71.58
213~75
616~O4
314^6'3
13,173^"SD
34~95
1.99^O0
164^22
27~42
14,871^66
518^63
115.4O
�INAL TOTAL 364,]B4^77
FUND 10
FUND 14
FUND 20
FUND 21
FUND 24
FUND 25
FUND 28
FUND 29
FUND 32
FUND 35
FUND 36
FUND 37
FUND 39
FUND 40
FUND 47
FUND 50
FUND 65
FUND 66
FUND 98
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS
July 31, 1992
20539.20
72.51
5112.22
1733.66
19321.95
3273.17
387.90
740.95
3140.55
24211.43
24211.43
24211.44
9530.76
11598.58
13173.30
78854.18
74533.77
748.83
197.50
STAFF REPORT AGENDA
DATE: Aut>ust 4, 1992
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Laurie Mora, Deputy City Clerk
SUBJECT: Claim - GTE (3/17/92 & 4/27/92) Rejection - JS 92-1S
RECOMMENDATION: Reject the claim as recommended by the Claims Adjustor pursuant
to Government Code.
July 24, 1992
Pamela Lee, CMC
Deputy City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
P.O. Box 488
San Jacinto, CA 92581
RE: Claims Acknowledgement and Loss Advice
Dear Ms. Lee:
COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT POWERS
INSURANCE AUTHORITY
U
We are in receipt of the claim filed against the City of San Jacinto by claimant GTE
Telephone Operations. We merged this claim with the previous established G1'h file for
the street improvement project along Esplanade Avenue:
Claimant: Ott. Telephone OPerations Date of Loss: 04/27/92 File #: JS 92-18
We also request that you take the action indicated below:
[ X ] CLAIM REJECTION: Written rejection of claim by Title of Board or Operation of Law in accordance with Government Code
Section 913.
[ 1
LATE CLAIM Do NOT reject claim but RETURN it for failure to file within time limit prescribed in Government Code
Section 911.2. Transmittal NOT to contain "WARNING" required by Section 913, but should advise that the recourse to file
"Application for Leave to File Late Claim" as provided in Government Code Section 911.4. This must be returned within 45
days of the date claim mailed or delivered.
INSUFFICIENT CLAIM: Send notice of insufficiency for failure to comply with Government Code Section 910 and/or 910.2
and/or 910.4 and cite the following specific insufficiencies:
This must be seat! width' 20 days of your receipt of claim.
AMENDED CLAIM Reject claim as set forth in first paragraph above, CLAIM REJECTION.
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE CLAIM: Reject the Application under Government Code Section 911.8.
OPERATION OF LAW: Defer any written response pending our further advice.
Please provide us with a copy of any response requested above. If you have any questions,
please contact the CVJPIA office.
Sincerely,
ott Ellerbrock
Accounting/Claims Specialist
cc: City Attorney, Jim Cox
73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 200, Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 341-0492 FAX (619) 340-5949
STAFF REPORT AGENDA. 5.5.-^
DATE: Auaust 4, 1992
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Laurie Mora, Deputy City Clerk
SUBJECT: Claim - Environmental Industries, Inc. (Western Landscape) - JS 93-01
RECOMMENDATION: Reject the claim as recommended by the Claims Adjustor pursuant
to Government Code.
July 17, 1992
Pamela Lee, CMC
Deputy City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
P.O. Box 488
San Jacinto, CA 92581
RE: Claims Acknowledgement and Loss Advice
Dear Ms. Lee:
COACH ELLA VALLEY JOINT POWERS
INSURANCE AUTHORITY
go
RECEIVED CITY CLERK! OFF.
JUL 2 0 1992
By
We are in receipt of the claim filed against the City of San Jacinto by attorney Paul Rubino
of Fisher & Porter on behalf of claimant Environmental Industries, Inc. (Western
Landscape). At this time, we wish to advise you of our assigned file number:
Claimant: Environmental Industries, Inc. Date of Loss: 01/04/92 File #: JS 93-01
We also request that you take the action indicated below:
[ X 1 CLAIM RLJI3CTION: Written rejection of claim by "title of Board or Operation of Law in accordance with Government Code
Section 913.
l 1
LATE CLAIM: Do NOT reject claim but RETURN it for failure to file within time limit prescribed in Government Code
Section 911.2. Transmittal NOT to contain "WARNING" required by Section 913, but should advise that the recourse to file
"Application for Leave to File Late Claim" as provided in Government Code Section 911.4. This must be returned within 45
days of the date claim mailed or delivered.
INSUFFICIENT CLAIM Send notice of insufficiency for failure to comply with Government Code Section 910 and/or 910.2
and/or 910.4 and cite the following specific insufficiencies:
This must be sent wiilun 20 days of your receipt of claim.
AMENDED CLAIM Reject claim as set forth in first paragraph above, CLAIM REJECTION.
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TV FIE LATE CLAIM: Reject the Application under Government Code Section 911.8.
OPERATION OF LAW: Defer any written response pending our further advice.
Please provide us with a copy of any response requested above. If you have any questions,
please contact the CVJPIA office.
Sincerely,
Scott Ellerbrock
Accounting/Claims Specialist
cc: City Attorney, Jim Cox
73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 200, Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 341-0492 FAX (619) 340-5949
STAFF REPORT AGENDA
DATE: Aw«ust 4, 1992
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Laurie Mora, Deputy City Clerk
SUBJECT: Claim - Jeannie E. Duistermars
RECOMMENDATION: Reject the claim as recommended by the City Attorney pursuant to
Government Code.
COX, COX &_ CAMPER
THOMAS M. CCX
DAMES A. GOX
ELERDY M CAMPER:
July 29, 1992
Laurie Mora
Pam Lee
City of San Jacinto
201 East Main Street
San Jacinto, CA 92583
Re:
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
8O5 EAST FLORIDA AX ENUE
HEMET, CALIFORNIA 92543
Tort Claim of Janine Duistermars
Presented July 15, 1992
Date of Incident: Feb. 18, 1992
Dear Laurie and Pam.
TELEPHONE
AREA CODE 714
6E2-1400
TAX >€S2-390C
Pursuant to the request of Pam Lee. I have reviewed the claim
and supporting documents presented on the above -referenced
claim.
It is i
Thanks.
Sincerely,
ommendation that the claim be denied.
A
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Les Evans, Public Works Director
DATE: August 4, 1992
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 959, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO
931 DESIGNATING TRUCK ROUTES WITHIN THE CITY
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt (Second Reading) Ordinance No. 959, waive the reading in full and read by title only.
BACKGROUND
On July 21, 1992, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. 959, amending Ordinance NO.
931 designating Truck Routes within the City. It would now he appropriate for the Council
to adopt the Ordinance which would take effect in 30 days.
ORDINANCE NO. 9 5 9
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 931 DESIGNATING TRUCK
ROUTES WITHIN THE CITY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA. DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Ordinance No. 931 is hereby amended by deleting Section 4, Paragraph D. and
substituting the following new Paragraph D:
D. Esplanade Avenue from the westerly most City limits, easterly to San Jacinto
Street.
- -
Introduced at a regular meeting
day of July 1992.
said City Council on the 21st
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council
on the day of 1992 by the following vote.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST
Deputy City Clerk
City of San Jacinto 'E"
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief/Building Official 4 7/28/1Z—
Via City Manager Pamela S. Easter
DATE: August 4, 1992
SUBJECT: 1992 WEED ABATEMENT COLLECTION FOR
REGULAR TAX BILL
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution confiuiiung the cost of
weed abatement and providing for the collection on the regular tax bill for
unpaid weed abatement bills.
Background:
Resolution No. 2025 was adopted on March 17th, 1992 declaring weeds a public
nuisance and initiating the City's annual weed abatement program. The City
Council adopted Resolution No. 2030 on April 7th, 1992 overruling any and all
objections.
This resolution confirms the cost of abatement and provides for the collection on
the regular tax bill of unpaid weed abatement bills in accordance with the
provisions of Government Code Sections 39577-39583. Exhibit "A" to this
resolution lists the weed abatement bills not paid to this date. The resolution and
Exhibit "A" must be sent to the County by August 10, 1992, so the liens will be
placed on the next regular tax bills of the appropriate property owners.
Page 1
August 4, 1992 Weed Abatement Resolution - Collection on Tax Bill
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THE COST OF ABATEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR
THE COLLECTION ON THE REGULAR TAX BILL
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ASSEMBLED IN REGULAR
SESSION THIS 4th DAY OF AUGUST, 1992 DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025 on March 17th. 1992, which by its terms the
Council elected to proceed under Government Code Sections 39501-39588 and did declare as a public
nuisance all weeds growing upon streets, sidewalks and private property in the City all rubbish, refuse and
dirt upon parkways, sidewalks and private property; and
A public hearing was held on April 7, 1992, and objections to the proposed removal of weeds,
rubbish, refuse and dirt were made or presented either in writing or orally; and
The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2030 on April 7th, 1992 and did overrule objections and
determined to proceed with the abatement of weeds growing upon public ways and private property in the
City; and
The Superintendent has abated the nuisance declared by Resolution No. 2025 and has kept an
account of the cost of abatement and has submitted it to the City Council for confirmation.
NOW, THEREFORE. IT IS FOUND, DETERMINED AND ORDERED AS
FOLLOWS:
1. The foregoing is true.
2. The City Council ordered the Superintendent to abate the nuisance by Resolution No. 2025
by having weeds, rubbish, refuse and dirt removed and thereafter the Superintendent entered upon private
property more particularly hereafter described to abate the nuisance, and the Superintendent kept an
account of the cost of abatement and has submitted to the City Council for continuation in the form of an
itemized written report showing the cost, and a copy of the report has been posted in the time and manner
required by Government Code Section 39575. No objections were filed or made by the property owner
liable for assessment for the abatement, and the report as set forth in Exhibit "A" is confirmed, except:
3. The cost of abatement as set forth in Exhibit "A" constitutes a specialassessment against
that parcel and is a lien on the parcel.
4. The City Clerk is directed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the County
Assessor, County Tax Auditor on or before August 10th, 1992. The County Auditor is requested to enter
the assessment on the County tax roll and to collect the total amount of the assessment at the time and in
the manner as other ordinary municipal taxes. All in the manner provided by Government Code Sections
39560-39587.
Page 1
August 4, 1992 Weed Abatement Resolution - Collection on Tax Bill
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
resolution and cause it to be published pursuant to law.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of August 1992 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
Mayor
The foregoing is certified to he a true copy of Resolution No. duly adopted by the said
City Council of the city of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein.
City Clerk
Page 2
EXHIBIT oAo
ASSESSOR'S
D2QRz8L NO. CONTRACTOR'S FEE ADMIN. FEE TOTAL DUE
424-070~002~0 485.00 140.00 635.00
424~080~029~6 432,00 140,00 572.00
434-I0I~006-9 260.00 I40,00 400.00
424~151~008~6 145.00 140,00 285.00
424-151~009~7 230.00 140,00 370.00
424~353~031-3 325.00 140.00 365,00
424~271~009~8 95.00 140.00 335.00
434~27I~0I0~8 - 95.00 I40,00 - 235,00
434-273-003~8 350.00 I40.00 490.00
434-273-0I4~9 I75.00 I40.00 315.00
434-282-0I6-8 375.00 I40.00 5I5.00
434-291-019-9 485,00 140.00 635.00
435-063-021-2 255,00 I40.00 395,00
435-124-02I-0 95,00 I40,00 235.08
435-151-014-8 175.00 140.00 �l5,88
435-152-005-2 485.00 I40.00 625,80
437-I42-0I3-3 170.00 140.00 3I0,00
437-271~011~9 200,00 140.00 340.00
437~38I-084-5 600,00 I40.00 740.00
437-282-0I0-3 175.00 I40.00 315.00
437-282-011-4 175.00 140.80 215.88
437~282-819~2 75,00 140.08 315.08
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA S 8
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
STAFF REPORT
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
August 4, 1992
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 960, RELATED TO CHANGE OF ZONE 3-91
AND ASSOCIATED WITH ANNEXATION 66
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council Adopt Ordinance No. 960, waive the reading of the
ordinance in full and read by title only.
BACKGROUND
On July 28, 1992, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. 960 which is related to pre -
annexation Change of Zone 3-91. Pre -annexation Change of Zone 3-91 establishes the
zoning classifications for Annexation No. 66.
Approved By:
-&
Timothy M. Hults Brian McNabb
Director of Community Development
Senior Planner
ORDINANCE NO. 960
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE
OF ZONE 3-91 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY
OF SAN JACINTO
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby amended by adding thereto Change of
Zone 3-91 as herein set forth.
Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the City of San Jacinto shown on the
attached map marked Exhibit "A" made a part hereof, is hereby established.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the
same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the
County of Riverside, State of California.
Section 4. A Final Environmental Impact Report has been prepared and Certified
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act for Change of Zone 3-91 which
has identified measures to mitigate potential impacts on the environment related to this
change.
Section 5. The Final Environmental Impact Report has identified that although there
may be a significant impact on the environment by right of the change related to Change
of Zone 3-91, a Statement of Overriding Considerations and Findings of Fact have been
adopted and incorporated into the Certified Final Environmental Impact Report.
Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 28th day of July 1992.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the
day of 1992 by the following vote.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST
Mayor Deputy City Clerk
-1-
CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. duly
adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held
the day of 1992.
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this
day of 1992.
City Clerk
AIIMMILM16
-` TM. Ite-e-Matee
0^-4-1.1011.9
= smut mow e-a
= T1164..10.110.4,1.11010 NW A-0MM
TV/01.4.401. 14,
= MUMS MM. fil-*
110MPTIPT.
"-1111111.1M149. 190.010SISMAL C-8
MST 111•0180.1811.1611.1 2.1
-1,011116.1.4111X111100MVP SOINIA
110100101,..10.6711
.....m.111005111,6 00-00 0:2011190=1,
0908101.10601516.1 0.110114LXV OleT19111C4 TOTAL
•
CHA GE OF ZONE 3-91
EXHIBIT A
fteeSIS.06.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA 5_ '/0
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
STAFF REPORT
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
August 4, 1992
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 961, RELA1ED TO ZONING ORDINANCE
AMENDMENT 3-92 ESTABLISHING THE URBAN RESERVE OVERLAY
ZONE
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council Adopt Ordinance No. 961, waive the reading of the
ordinance in full and read by title only.
BACKGROUND
On July 28, 1992, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. 961 which is related to Zoning
Ordinance Amendment 3-92. Zoning Ordinance Amendment 3-92 amends Ordinance No.
340 by establishing Article 14D, the Urban Reserve Overlay zone classification.
Prepare . : * Approved By:
Timothy M. Hults Brian McNabb
Senior Planner Director of Community Development
ORDINANCE NO. 961
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 3-92, ESTABLISHING ARTICLE
14D, OF ORDINANCE 340, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, TO
BE KNOWN AS THE URBAN RESERVE OVERLAY ZONE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Article 14D, of Ordinance 340 is hereby established as shown on Exhibit "A",
attached and incorporated herein.
Section 2. This ordinance will take effect thirty (30) days from the passage thereof.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same
to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County
of Riverside, State of California.
Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 14th day of July 1992.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the
day of 1992 by the following vote.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
ATTEST
Deputy City Clerk
-1-
CER I 1FICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. duly adopted by the
City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of
1992.
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of
1992.
City Clerk
ARTICLE 14D
URBAN RESERVE OVERLAY DISTRICT
14D.01 PURPOSE
The purpose of the Urban Reserve Overlay District is to
protect the integrity, viability and potential for
expansion of existing agricultural uses; to allow the
orderly transition of land from agricultural to urban
uses in compliance with the General Plan; and to allow
property to develop at urban densities and uses while
providing temporary buffering for existing agricultural
uses in the District.
14D.02 ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT
The Urban Reserve Overlay District can be established -on
any property which has an existing agricultural use. The
District shall be designated on the official zoning map
with the symbol "UR" in conjunction with the underlying
zone classification consistent with the General Plan.
14D.03 CRITERIA FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF/OR INCLUSION IN DISTRICT
The minimum size required to establish the Urban Reserve
Overlay District is ten acres.
Any property owner with an existing agricultural use may
request or apply for an Urban Reserve classification.
The City may include any existing agricultural use in the
District. The property may be placed in the Urban
Reserve District in any of the following ways:
A. Upon annexation to the City of an agricultural use
(unless disestablished per Section 4 below).
B. City may place an agricultural use in the District
after proper notice and hearing provided property
hasn't been previously been classified UR.
C. The property may be classified UR upon filing of a
zone change request by the property owner and
subsequent approvals through the hearing process by
the Planning Commission and City Council.
14D.04 CRITERIA FOR DISESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT
Agricultural uses will automatically be disestablished
from the Urban Reserve District if:
A. Prior to the annexation pre -zoning public hearing
the property owner requests not to be included in
Urban Reserve District. There will be no fee for
this request.
B. Between August 1st and September 30th of any year,
the property owner of any property in the City may
request, on appropriate City application, to be
removed from the District. There will be a $50.00
fee for this request.
The Community Development Department shall compile
a list of the properties who have requested
disestablishment in any one year and forward said
list to the Planning Commission and City Council
for their information only. October 1st shall be
the effective date of the disestablishments for all
requests in accordance with 14D.04B above.
14D.05 CRITERIA FOR RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT
Any property voluntarily removed from the UR
classification can be re-established upon the request and
subsequent approval of a change of zone request through
the hearing process by the Planning Commission and City
Council.
14D.06 PERMITTED LAND USES
Any use permitted by Ordinance No. 340, Article 4, Light
Agriculture Zone, may be established, continued or
expanded in the Urban Reserve Overlay District. The
regulations of the "A" zone shall apply to all property
within the Urban Reserve Overlay District.
14D.07 BUFFERING OF ADJACENT LAND -USES
A. Any property, adjacent to property within the Urban
Reserve Overlay District, which proposes urban
intensity residential development consistent with
the General Plan must provide temporary buffering
to protect the integrity and viability of the
existing agricultural use in the UR District. The
temporary buffering shall be determined on a case
by case basis. Examples of temporary buffering
include, but are not limited to: open space, one
acre lots or development phasing.
B. It is the policy of the City of San Jacinto that no
agricultural activity, operation or facility
conducted or maintained in a manner consistent with
proper and accepted customs or standards shall
become a nuisance due to changed conditions on
adjacent properties.
Therefore, any adjacent property proposed for urban
intensity residential development must provide
buffering to minimize the impact on the integrity
and viability of the existing agricultural
activity, operation or facility in the District.
C. Residential development proposals approved within a
one mile radius of an Urban Reserve District shall
include language on the final map notifying
potential buyers of the existence of agricultural
properties and agricultural uses in a UR District
within the vicinity of the development.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
STAFF REPORT
A ENDA
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
August 4, 1992
Award of Contract for Construction of Domestic Water Well No. 28 and
related Well Site Improvements related to Community Facilities District #2
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the contract for the construction of Domestic Water Well No. 28 and
related improvements be awarded to McCalla, Division of Layne, Inc. in the amount of
$750,354. --
BACKGROUND
The subject well is related to the Rancho San Jacinto Specific Plan and will be located on
the west side of Mountain Avenue, between Washington Avenue and Esplanade Avenue.
Funding for the construction of the well and related improvements was derived from
Community Facilities District No. 2 budget.
The subject project was bid in accordance with state law, with the bid closing date being July
28, 1992. The three low bids are as follows:
1. McCalla, Division of Layne
2. Genesis Construction
3 Beylik Drilling
$750,354.00
$752,450.00
$765,591.50
City staff and consultants have reviewed the bids and have noted mathematical discrepancies
in the McCalla bid. The bid has been adjusted accordingly and the City's consultant
recommends that the McCalla bid be awarded.
Prepared B
Timothy M. Hults
Senior Planner
Approved By:
Brian K. McNabb
Director of Community Development
SITE LOCATION
DOMESTIC WATER WELL NO. 28
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.2
VICINITY MAP
?t T. S.