The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 10/20/1992AGENDA SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DATE: October 20, 1992 TIME: 7:30 P.M. PLACE: COMMUNITY CENTER 625 South Pico San Jacinto, California 1.0 CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Moment of Silence for Reflection Pledge of Allegiance 2.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2.1 RDA Budget Update RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. 3.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 3.1 Employee of the Quarter RECOMMENDATION: Recognize the Employee of the Third Quarter. 3.2 Service Recognition Awards RECOMMENDATION: Recognize Barry Jeffs for his dedicated years of service, 4.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person may address the Council on any subject pertaining to city business not listed on the agenda, during this portion of the meeting. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the Council. 1 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion by the City Council in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests specified items to be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come forward, upon invitation of the Mayor, state their name, address and the Consent Calendar item number Speakers should limit comments to three minutes. 5.1 Claim - Ambriz. Jose RECOMMENDATION: Reject the Claim as recommended by the City Attorney. 5.2 Warrant Register RECOMMENDATION: Approve warrant numbers 30173 through 30316 dated October 15, 1992 in the amount of $572,432.60 and Payroll check numbers 20902 through 21034 dated October 8, 1992. Janitorial Services Contract RECOMMENDATION: Approve the contract with "In His Service" (IHS) for janitorial services at 201 E. Main, 312 E. Main, Police Department and Community Center in the amount of $1,150.00 per month. 5.4 Agreement for providing materials testing services for pavement rehabilitation on Main Street and Seventh Street RECOMMENDATION: Approve the agreement with County of Riverside to provide materials testing for Pavement Rehabilitation on Main Street and Seventh Street, 5.5 First Amendment to the Santa Ana NPDES Implementation Agreement RECOMMENDATION: Approve the first amendment to the Santa Ana NPDES Implementation Agreement. 5.6 Purchase of 1989 GMC Dump Truck RECOMMENDATION: Approve the purchase a 1989 GMC Dump truck from Valenti & Sons in the amount of $21,065.13. 2 5.7 Second Reading Ordinance No. 963 - Single Family Compatibility Standards RECOMMENDATION: Waive the reading in full, and read by title only, and Adopt (Second Reading) Ordinance No. 963. ORDINANCE NO. 963 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO CREATING COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT Salary - City Clerk and City Treasurer RECOMMENDATION: Waive the full reading of Ordinance No. and ready by title only; Introduce (First Reading) Ordinance No. establishing bonds and salary for City Clerk and City Treasurer. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ORDINANCE 238, AND ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF BOND AND SALARY FOR THE CITY CLERK AND CITY TREASURER 5.9 Notice of Completion - Vista Murrieta Corporation, Grand Avenue Water Filtration System RECOMMENDATION: Accept the Grand Avenue Water Filtration System and authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion. Authorization for expenditure of Gasoline Tax for repair of Park Avenue between Sonoma Drive and South City limits RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the expenditure of $20,000 to participate in a City of Hemet project to repair Park Avenue. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion by: Seconded by: to approve consent calendar items 5.1 through 5.10 and Introduce Ordinance No. and adopt Ordinance No. 963. 6.0 PUBLIC HEARING 6.1 Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91, Change of Zone 11-91 and Related Final Environmental Impact Report RECOMMENDATION: 1. Confirm that the Sunrise Ranch Final environmental Impact Report adequately evaluates environmental impacts related to the future development of the project and provides adequate mitigation to the extent feasible and that those impacts which cannot be feasibly mitigated are outweighed by the project generated benefits to the community and that the Final EIR provides a sufficient degree of analysis to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City Environmental Guidelines and that the City Council adopt a Resolution certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report. 2. Adopt a Resolution approving Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91 as the Specific Plan of Land Use for the real property shown on the plan subject to Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval incorporated herein. 3. Introduce an Ordinance approving Change of Zone 11-91 subject to the Findings of Fact incorporated herein and waive the reading of the Ordinance in full and read by title only. RESOLUTION NO. 7 ( A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RELATED TO CONCEPTUAL SPECIFIC PLAN 1-91 (SUNRISE RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN) AND CHANGE OF ZONE 11-91 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO APPROVING CONCEPTUAL SPECIFIC PLAN 1-91, KNOWN AS THE SUNRISE RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN, SUBJECT TO CERTIFICATION OF THE RELATED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 11-91, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO 4 9.0 CLOSED SESSION 10.0 ADJOURNMENT Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to adjourn. Vote: I, Maurice Armster, do hereby certify that I caused to be posted the foregoing agenda this 16th day of October, 1992, as required by law. Maurice Armster, City Clerk 6 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 7.1 Water & Sewer Fee Adjustments - (Continued from October 6. 1992) 7.1.1 Water Rate Adjustment - Evans RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution �No. adjusting water rates. RESOLUTION NO. 73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA ADJUSTING WATER RATES 7.1.2 Sewer Rate Adiustment - Evans RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. adjusting sewer rates. RESOLUTION NO. 2 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA ADJUSTING SEWER RATES 7.2 Village 4 - Soboba Specific Plan - Easter RECOMMENDATION: Direct Staff whether or not to defer payment on the Fire Truck loan or install landscaping and whether or not to call bonds for paving completion. 7.3 "Shop the Valley" Program - Easter RECOMMENDATION: Participate in the "Staying Home for the Holidays!" marketing program, and contribute $250 to the budget from Redevelopment Funds. 8.0 MAYOR/ COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS 8.1 Appointment of Planning Commissioners RECOMMENDATION: Appoint Planning Commissioners to fill one short term and one long term vacancy effective on November 1, 1992. 8.2 Discussion of Mobile Home Rent Review Control - Leahy 8.3 Discussion of San Jacinto Valley School of the Arts "Social" - Boykin 5 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Anna Vega. Finance Director via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager SUBJ: Redevelopment Agency State Budget Update DATE: October 20, 1992 RECOMMENDATION Defer Redevelopment Agency budget adjustments to January 1993. FISCAL IMPACT Exact fiscal impact is being deteLmined by the State. Budget amendment will be presented in January 1993 when information is received from the State. BACKGROUND On September 1, 1992 the Senate and Governor approved Senate Bills 617 and 844. S.B. 617 and S.B. 844 shifts a total of $400 million of redevelopment tax revenue to the State for school funding. These Bills shift property tax revenue, other than those revenues that are pledged to debt service and were deemed allocated in the prior fiscal year Redevelopment budget. The Bills state that no reduction to the Redevelopment Agency shall exceed an amount equal to 10 percent of the Redevelopment total annual revenues, from whatever source. The amount shall be calculated based upon the most recent State Controller's Report submitted to the State. The following are quotes from Bill 844 that affect our Redevelopment Agency: The auditor in each County shall, on or before January 15, 1993, and on or before January 30 each year thereafter, submit information to the State Controller concerning the amount or the property tax revenue reduction of each special district within the county. The State Controller shall certify that the calculation of the property tax revenue reduction to each special district within the county is accurate and correct, and submit this information tc the State Director or Finance. Page 2 Redevelopment Agency Budget Update The State Director of Finance shall determine whether the total of the amounts of the property tax revenue reductions to special districts, as certified by the State Controller, is equal to the amount that would be required to be allocated to school districts and community college districts as a result of a $375 million shift of property tax revenues from special districts for the 1992-93 fiscal year. In no event shall the amount of the property tax revenue loss to a special district exceed 40% of the district's property tax revenues or 10% of that district total revenues, from whatever source. Summary Staff has contacted the League of California Cities, State Department of Finance and State Controller's Department of Local Affairs. All three agencies were not able to provide information as to the impact these Bills would have specifically on San Jacinto's Redevelopment Agency. The State Departments did not know who was going to be doing the calculations and therefore, could not give us the dollar amount of impact. Our Redevelopment attorney's are evaluating our pass through agreements and our debt services. Therefore, until these numbers can be finalized, staff is requesting to defer Redevelopment Agency action until the mid -year budget adjustments in January 1993. STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lu Ann Chadwick Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: October 20, 1992 SUBJECT: Employee of the Quarter RECOMMENDATION : Recognize the Employee of the Third Quarter. BACKGROUND : Forms were sent to all City employees for submitting nominations for the employee of the third quarter. From those nominations one employee was selected by an impartial committee of community leaders. The person they selected will be announced at the City Council Meeting and presented with an appreciation plaque at that time. STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lu Ann Chadwick Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: October 20, 1992 SUBJECT: SERVICE RECOGNITION AWARD FOR BARRY JEFFS. RECOMMENDATION : It is recommended that the City Council recognize this outstanding employee for his dedicated years of service. BACKGROUND : Barry Jeffs was hired 5 years ago as a fire fighter. He now serves the City of San Jacinto as a Fire Engineer. He and his wife Cindy met at work 4 1/2 years ago. They are currently trying to sell their home in Hemet to purchase one in Rancho San Jacinto Barry loves to spend his free time playing water sports. STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Laurie Mora, Deputy City Clerk DATE: October 20, 1992 SUBJECT: Claim - Jose Ambriz RECOMMENDATION: Reject the Claim as recommended by the City Attorney. THOMAS M. COX JAMES A. COX BEVERLY M. CAMPER COX, COX & CAMPER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW S05 EAST FLORIDA AVENUE HEMET, CALIFORNIA 92543 September 25, 1992 NOTICE OF INSUFFICIENCY Salvador and Maricela Ambriz 181 N. San Jacinto Street San Jacinto, California 92583 Re: Claim of Jose Miguel Ambriz Presented September 23, 1992 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 714 652-1400 FAX (7I4) 652-3990 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Ambriz: Pursuant to my telephone conversation with Mrs. Ambriz on September 25, 1992, I am returning a copy of your claim presented to the City Clerk on September 23, 1992. I am returning the copy of the claim to you for your reference because it does not comply with Government Code Section 910 by including an amount claimed against the City, a description of the injury, or any medical expenses incurred by your son. Without an amount claimed, it is difficult for the City to evaluate and act on your claim. Mrs. Ambriz informed me that she would amend the claim to state an amount claimed, and perhaps attach actual copies of the medical bills. For further information, you may wish to consult Sections 910, 910.2, 910.4 and 910.8, and other sections of the Government Code pertaining to the filing of claims against a public entity. Because of the various time limits for the filing of claims, you should correct the deficiencies immediately. Thanks again for your cooperation and assistance. Sincerely, JAC:ph cc: Laurie Mora Dennis Malloy STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance Director Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager SUBJECT: Approval of Register of Audited Demands and Payroll Checks DATE: October 20, 1992 RECOMMENDATION Approve warrant numbers 30173 through 30316 dated October 15, 1992 in the amount of $572,432.60 and Payroll check numbers 20902 through 21034 dated October 8, 1992, SUMMARY A listing of accounts payable warrants is attached for your review and approval. Payroll information is available for your review in the Finance Department. 'GLCD12 IT� OF SA# .ACINTO REGISTER OF A|J�ITED DEMANDS PAGE 1 �Oi73* 3O174* 3O175* 3O176it. 3O177* 3O178* 30179* 38180* 30181* 30182* 30183* 30184* 3O185* 30186* 301G7* 3O188* 3O189* 3019O* 3O191* 3O192* 3O193* 30194* 95* 96* �0197* 3O19Q* 3O199* 3O2OO* '30201* 3O2O2* 30203* 302O4* 7&O2O5* 3O2O6* 302O7* 3O2O8* 30209 30210 30211 30212 3O213 30214 3O215 30216 302i7 3O218 30219 30220 21 j222 3OZ23 UNITED CALIFOi'.", BANK ISSUED TO SO^ CA. EDISON SO^ CA, GAS CITY OF SAN JACINTO SO. Co. EDISON SO, CA^ GAS HOWARD ESCROW U.S. POSTMASTER SO, co. GAS SO. CA. EDISON COUNlY OF RIVERSIDE SO^ CA. GAS SO~ CA, EDISON JIM RICHARDS CARLETON MEYERS CITY OF SAN JACINTO SO. CA~ GAS SO~ CA^ EDISON SO, CA~ EDISON SO^ CA^ GAS ED HUXELL PUBLIC EMP^ RElV^ SYSTEM ICMA RIVERSIDE CO^ EMI-`. DENTI CARE O~K^ ASSOC^ INC~ HAINT^ SUPERINTENDENT� SO^ CA^ EDISON SO^ CA^ GAS STANDARD INS,, COMPANY LEAGUE OF CALIF^ CITllE6 SO. CA. EDISON 8O. CA~ GAS SO, CA~ GAS SO^ CA. EDISON PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS STETSON BAR-B-QUE A~1 LOCK & KEY AT It., T AT & T ADIKONDACK DIRECT ALL PURE CHEMICAL CO, AL'S LAWNMOWER SHOP GUNNAR ANDERSON LOUIS K^ ARROYn+ JK+ ARROW PRINTING E.S. BABCOCK & SONS BALLARD GAS SERVICE INC HAROLD BARRON BIO SAFETY SYSTEMS BOB'S LUMBER BUILDERS EMPORIUM A/C 201398 DATE 10/15/92 DESCRIPTION PAYMENT COLLECTIONS PAYMENT COLLECTION8 NET PAY[|OLL PA�ME��T COLLECTIONS PAYMEHT COLLECTIONS DOWNTOWN PARKING LOT POSTAGE WATER BILLS PAYMENT COLLECTION8 PAYME#T COLLECTIONS MEETI�f�~G°LANTZ ��YMENT COLLECTIONS PAYMENT COLLECTION6 TRr,VEL ADV^-CONF^ C3NSULT�NT RETAINER NET PAYROLL PAYMENT COLLECTIONS PAYMENT COLLECTIONS PAYMEHT COLLECTIONS ��YHENT COLLECTIONS REF.�ND WATER DEPOSIT i:"'ETIREMENT DEFERRE� COMP. CREDIT UNION BENEFIT~DENTAL REFUGE COLLECTIONS �E�BER��HIP~R^ VRYHEID F'AYHEHT COLLECTIDNS PAYMENT COLLECTIONS LIFE DISABILITY LEGIGL/�TIVE IMPL^ SEMINAR PAyMENT COLLECTIONS PA;ME14T COLLECTIONS !::zAYMf::':HT COLLECTIONS PAYMENT COi.LECTIONS ��ALOG TERMINAL ADAPTOR 2X% DE�` XMAS (RE" MB^ TO CITY) LOCK � KEYS P^D^ LGH{� DI�TANCE SERVICE LONG DISTAHCE SERVICE �i/DIO VISUAL CART~~REDVLP, CHLORI�E/SODA`WATER S<]PPLIE� & SERVICE REFUND WATER/TRASH DEPOSIT JANITORIAL SERVICE�OCTOBER PRIHTING ECON,~DEVLP & P°D° FORMS L��B TESTS~WATER PROPANE REFUHD �ATER/TRASH OVERPAYMIENT FIRE SAFETY EQUIPMENT-F+D^ REDIMIX~WATER WATER �UPPLIES AMOUNT 1,080,37 2U5.99 9,722.39 471.73 13O.27 1,aOO^OO 4OO^O0 598^O9 1'094^26 15600 9B^75 171^13 394^OO 8OO~OO 99,1O1^46 192^55 278^57 551,08 291^O6 50^OO 18,338^12 1,O63^46 2,967^60 2'242^43 87,320.21 30^O0 979.37 507^11 2,998.22 225~O0 2,267^36 776^41 548^65 1,510^59 1°O47,51 3OO^OO 115^90 12,29 31O^02 419^28 941^0O 36^53 25^OO 1,900^0O 1,09l^51 146.00 26.50 16~85 675,68 12^81 371^49 CITY OF SAN JACINTO 61-CD12 REGISTER OF AUDITETI DEMANIS PAGE 2 CHECK 3O224 3O225 30226 30227 30220 30229 30230 30231 30232 30233 30234 30235 30236 30237 30230 30239 30240 30241 3O242 3O243 30244 30245 30246 30247 30248 30249 3O25O 3D251 30252 30253 3O254 30255 "3O256 3O257 30258 3O259 30260 3O261 3O262 30263 30264 30265 30266 30267 30268 ,0269 30270 3O271 30272. 30273 302274 UNITED CALIFD��I� BANK ISSUED TO BOMBLEBEE WHOLESALE CRA ST^ BOARD EQUALIZATIUN CAL GAR DOOR (-.1O^ CAPE ACCOUNTING CAR WASH DEPOT CASTELLANO'S TOWING LUANN CHADWICK CHEVRON^ U^S°A° CIRCUIT CITY COM SER CO. COMPUTER SUPPLY C^E^D^ THE COUNSELING TEAM CREDIT BUREAU OF CORUN-) D&J DAVE DAVIDSON DE BROS BLUEPRINTNG DENMARK CONSTRUCTION l/EWEY'S ELECTRIC R.F. DICKSON COMPANY EASTERN MUNI^WATEK DIST EVANS & ASSOCIATES FEDERAL LICENSING OFELIA FIERRO FIRE SAFETY SUpPLY FIRST INTERSTATE BANK FLOYD JOHNSTON GALLS, INC. GENERAL TELEPHONE CD, GILLESPIE REPORTING GREENWOOD+S UNIFORMS HEMACINTO RECYCLING G,L^ HELMS CONSTRUCTI�� HEMET NEWS HEMET VALLEY TOOL HOT SHOTS 1 HOUR PHOTD HOUSE OF QUALITY HOUSING AUTHORITY HUBBS STATIONERY HURLEY'S AUTOMOTIVE l,B.M° CORP. I#LAND CHEVRDLET INLAND UN1:FORMS J & M AIR CONDITIONING J & R CONCRETE PRODUCTS C,R. JAESCHKE INC^ W^ JOBE, KAMMEYER & ASSOCIATES KENNEDY COURT REPORTING KINDERPRINT COMPANY A/C 201398 DATE 10/15/92 �ESC��IPTIDN AMMUNITION~P^D^ LEGISL/�TIVE MEMBERSHIP \�NDERGROUND STORAGE �EPLACE 4 BAY DOORS~F^D, CA PROP^ & EVIDENCE MEMBERSHIP VEHICL1-: WASH TOWIHG CHARGES BUS, LIC^ OKD^ SEMINAR S�SOLI#E REFRIGE�ATOR^P~W^/WATER RADIO 'INT. CONTRACT COMPUTE� SUPPLIES P^W. ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE PHSY^ ASST.-NEW HIRE TRW CHEICKS-NEW HIRES L��DS�A�E~PARK HILL RESERVE POLICE OFFICER MYLARS ELECTRICAL SERVICE .... P^D^/ADM^ CAPSYLITE LAMP5~DISPATCH STREET SWEEPING�SEPTEMBER UTILITIES �.W, DIRECTOR SERVICE REHEW �ADIO LICENSE REIMB, MILEAGE HELMET.F^D+ -IASTERCARD STMT. ESPLAHADE STROM DRAIN TOOLS-�^D. PHO�E �ERVICES HE� CLAIMANT/HG�NANDEZ BATONO~ TRAINEES REFUND METER DEFOSIT DVE-�PAYMENT-LLMD LEGAL ADVERTISING �AMMER ADAPTER~P~W^ FILI-) D. �UTG PARTG SEiNIOR HOME REPAIR PROGRAM OFFICE SUPPLIES REPL, PINION SEAL-P.D. M�INTE�ANCE-~PRINTER VEHICLE REPAIRS UHIF��#S-P^O. TRAINE �C~ �#IT & MAIMT^~ALL [/EPTS^ METER DOX LIDS �ARTG-HUSTLER MOWER REFU��D �ATER/TRASH DEPOSTT PARKW�Y MASTER PLAN CLAIMA#T� HERNANDEZ GUNSHOT KITS .... P~[/^ AM(-7 6p472^O0 120^O0 99~77 1'32(>+O0 35^0O 98~0(} 67+50 31^20 32°28 290^89 192~Z1 561~99 3O8^58 15O^O0 2O^O0 250.00 36~00 28^49 OFFICE 611^05 146^15 4'55O^00 1O6^66 5/28 6O6~O9 32,45 173061^87 210^93 3»44O^22 112~48 17^13 5OO~0O 90,O6l80 438^91 152`15 12^18 733^66 274^i9 781+28 82^56 201^00 41+23 1237^07 4'O73^56 599,95 620.50 9^43 -7 23 43��,�-J 81^O4 CITY OF SA# JACINTO x' GLCD12 REGISTE� OF AUDITED D[MANDS PAGE 30275 3O276 30277 30278 30279 30200 30281 3O282 3O283 30284 -20285 3O286 30287 30280 30209 30290 30291 30292 3O293 3O294 30295 30296 3O3O0 3O3Ol 3O3O2 30303, 30304 303O5 3O3O6 303O7 3O3O8 30301? 30310 30311 3O312 3O313 3O314 3O315 30316 UNITED CALIF3RNIA BAP-K A/C 201398 DATE 10/15/92 lSSUED TO LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE GREG LANTZ LUNGS DRUG STORE BILL MACADAM MP LANDSCAPE MAINTENANC MARKMAN^ ARZYNSKl MARDEN�5USCO GEORGE MEFFAN MELCOM COMMUNICATIONS KENNETH MEYER. PHD MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE NCR CORPORATION NATlONAL BAG CO. NBS/LOWRY NEWARK ELECTRONICS NORTON BATTERY MF8^ CD^ OVERNIGHT INDUSTRIAL LONNIE PAGE PAGENET LARRY PIERCE PLUMBING PF4ESS.... ENTERPRISE PURSUIT SPECIALTIES KCFCA HAZMAT SECTION RAMONA ANIMAL HAVEN INC KEMARKABLE ��ODUCTS RDADk}AY SUPPLY SIGN CENTER SMITTY'S AUTO PAINTS SO^ CALIFOKNIA EDISDH SO. CALIFORNIA GAS CO. STRIDIVATNS TAABS DAVID TAUSSIG BILL TIBBETTS TlERRA MADRE CONSULTANT JOHN TOWNSEL ULTRASYS7EMS ENGINEERS VALLEY RESOURC� VAN WATERS & ROGERS XEROX CORPORATION CYNTHIA ZOELLNER THOMAS LUEBS & MORl DESCRIPTION FAX MACHINE .... P^D^ ECO, DEVLP. ASST. FILA, .... P^D^ TUITION REIMB~ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CLAIM0 HOUSED- V S^J^ WTR+ PIPE & SUPPLIES REFLiND WATER TRASH DEPOSIT REPY�IR MOBILE RADIO .... P.Lt. PSYCH R[PORT-NEW HIRE UNIFORM CLEANING KEPAIR PRINTER -WATER TUBING R'OLLS.... P^D^ REVISION TO ANNEX 66 CGHPUT�� SUPPLIES-P^D, BATTERI�S~8HOP S�PPLIES^ALL DEPTS. �<EFUND WATER DEPOSIT RENTAL RADIO PAGERS WATER �UPPLIES SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADS PA�TS-�^D^ VEHICLE MEMBERSHIP-F^I/. AHIMALS-SEPT^ EEOC POSTER~P^D. STENCIL GUARD~P~W^ NEIGHBO�HOOD WATCH SIGNS HOSE Y^~CHEVY PAINT TRUCK UTILITIES UTILITY SAFETY SHOES~BLD8 INSPECTOR SOFTW��E SERV^ AGREEMENT~WATE� CONSI.ALTING SERVICES-CFD'S LOCK CyLIMDER~F^[/~ SU�RISE �ANCH DRAFT REIMB~ OF MAILING �ROFESSIONAL GERVICE L�NDSC�PE`HOFFMAN PARK POT�SSIUM FILTRATION WELL CGPIER MAINTENANCE REFUND �ATER/TRASH DEPOSIT �EFUHl� SCHOOL MITG~ FEE AMOUNT 36^48 1,11O^OO 364~1O 5O~OO 3,O1O^0O 60^OO 26~6O 5O^OO 768^74 25^00 582,65 720.61 210.06 6'49D^33 78^60 279~50 268^49 50^0O 139~75 240^83 246^3O 6'U46^71 1O^OO 5O6^OO 15^9G 1'1S4^98 77.93 222^O7 39,441.O2 127^91 1OO^OO 675^OO 20219^O7 115^76 5,655^O0 26.63 9,527^32 510^0O 231^12 980^77 48~O4 FINAL TOTAL 572�432^60 REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS October 15, 1992 FUND 10 General Fund $41,605.09 FUND 11 Title IIIB $24.70 FUND 14 Sewer $980.76 FUND 20 Liability Ins. $606.48 FUND 21 Gas Tax $5,181.19 FUND 24 Measure A $1,271.81 FUND 25 LLMD $21,390.44 FUND 29 CDBG $274.19 FUND 32 Parkway Development $7,232.93 FUND 35 CFD NO. 1 $3,578.76 FUND 36 CFD No. 2 $10,273.46 FUND 37 CFD No. 3 $3,681.54 FUND 39 Flood Control $173,361.87 FUND 40 Vehicle Replacement $1,806.21 FUND 42 Asset Dist. 87-1 $4,750.13 FUND 47 Water Capital Improvment $1,709.26 FUND 50 Water Fund $31,270.17 FUND 65 Trust Fund $106,056.95 FUND 66 Asset Forefeiture $6,549.93 FUND 67 Fire Mitigation $8,859.41 FUND 96 RDA -San Jacinto $5,572.03 PAYROLL $136,395.29 TOTAL $572,432.60 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance Director via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager SUBJ: Janitorial Services Contract DATE: October 20, 1992 RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Mayor to enter into a contract with "In His Service" (IHS) for janitorial services at 201 E. Main, 312 E. Main, Police Department and Community Center. BACKGROUND The City has resolicited bids for janitorial services and window cleaning on the above mentioned addresses. The janitorial service companies contacted and bid amounts, are as follows: In His Service Lamp Janitorial All Points Maint. Service Master Valley Resource Self Jantorial $1,150.00 $1,199.00 $1,595.00 $1,899.00 $2,023.00 $3,070.00 (current contract) An interview and reference calls were made on the lowest bidder. The companies contacted regarding IHS performance, were all positive and gave good recommendations. The companies stated that IHS guarantees the work and their workers responsibilities to do the job required. IHS has also provided the City with a copy of the insurance certificate. IHS, low bidder, will maintain four of the City's buildings. (A copy of the work schedules is attached for your review.) The agreement with IHS has a service termination clause which requires a 30 day notice. IHS will be using their own equipment, thus saving the City funds in replacement cost of vacuum cleaners, etc. The City however, will continue being responsible for the purchase of paper goods and cleaning supplies. A Semi-annual steam cleaning was recommended by the janitorial companies. This will help extend the life of the new carpets installed last year at 201, 312 E. Main and the Police Department. The Cost for this service will be $660.00 per cleaning. The second bidder for carpet cleaning service was Service Master at $978. IN IS SERVICE ENTERPRISES 39340 Calle Contento Temecula, California 92390 (714) 676-6246 September 21, 1992 Ms. Anne Halberg City of San Jacinto Administration 312 E. Main San Jacinto, CA Dear Ms. Halberg: Thank you for the opportunity to bid again for the monthly janitorial needs of the City of San Jacinto. Our chief objective is to provide the highest quality ser— vice and to maintain your premises to your satisfaction. The way we differ from other companies is the weekly follow— up and continued concern for our customers. You will notice the differance. Enclosed you will find our written contract and summary of obligations. Thank you again for requestion our services. Sinc Richard R. Themm RRT:pkt SUMMARY OF OBLIGATION Five Times Weekly - General Areas 1. Empty all waste baskets and trash receptacles; replace liners as needed andremove all waste to the pick-up area. Dust all counters, ledges, window sills, picture frames and all flat surfaces. 3. Dust and/or damp wipe clean all desk tops, chairs, and office furniture (papers, folders and other material left on desk and other furniture will not be moved). 4. Vacuum all carpet; spot clean as needed. 5. Remove fingerprints, spots, etc from partition glass, light swithces, woodwork, doors and door frames. 6. Empty all ash trays and smoking stands (if applicable). 7. Mop/wet wax tile areas. Five Times Weekly - Restrooms 1. Mop all restroom floors with disinfectant cleaner. Base- boards will be wiped after mopping floors. 2. Toilet bowls and urinals shall be cleaned inside and out, removing staines, then sanitized. 3. Clean all wash basins. 4. Clean and polish all plumbing, faucets, valves and metal work. 5. Clean and polish all mirrors. 6. Clean parititions on all surfaces. 7. Clean wall surfaces as required. 8. Refill all dispensers. 9. Waste paper containers emptied, liners replaced, cleaned and disinfected as needed. TERMS AND CONDITIONS Customer Name: City of San Jacinto Address: 312 E. Main, San Jacinto, CA Contact: Anne Halberg Services will be performed outside of normal business hours except for the Police Department (24 hour day operation). In the event that this contract proves to be unsatisfactory, it may be terminated by a 30 day written notice by either party. Payment for services is due and payable within ten days of receipt of invoice. Invoices are issued at the end of each month. Cleaning supplies and labor will be provided for by "In His Service Enterprises". Paper products and trash can liners will be provided for by the City of San Jacinto. This contract is regarding four buildings located at 312 E. Main, 201 E. Main, 160 W. Sixth St. and 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, CA with approximate total of 12,000 sq. ft. SERVICE: 5 times per week FEE: $950.00 per month This contract begins on the 1st day of December , 1992. In His Service Enterprises City of San Jacinto Richard R. Themm Francis Boykin Owner Mayor Signature Signature Date Date TERMS AND CONDITIONS Customer Name: City of San Jacinto Address: 312 E. Main, San Jacinto, CA Contact: Anne Halberg This contract is regarding four buildings located at 312 E. Main 201 E. Main, 160 W. Sixth St. and 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, CA with approximate total 12,000 sq. ft. Payment for services is due and payable within ten days of receipt of invoice. Invoices are issued at the end of each month. In the event that this contract proves to be unsatisfactory, it may be teLminated by a 30 day written notice by either party. SUMMARY OF OBLIGATION Carpets steam cleaned semi-annually @ $660.00 per cleaning ($.12 per foot for 5,500 sq. ft.). If cleaning is performed more frequently, the cost will be reduced. Floor at 625 S. Pico (Community Center), strip waxed once per month @ $100.00 per month. Windows cleaned (inside and out) hi -monthly for $200.00 per month. This contract begins on the 1st day of December , 1992. IN HIS SERVICE ENTERPRISES CITY OF SAN JACINTO Richard R. Themm Francis Boykin Owner Mayor Signature Signature Date Date ODD estern Surety Co JANITORIAL SERVICE BOND any JUL i. 1991 Bond No 5,4459151 In consideration of an agreed premium, the Western Surety Company, a South Dakota corporation, Richard R. Them , Pamela K. Thgrm, & Kevin M. Themn DBA hereby agrees to indemnify Tn Hi G 4prvi ra rnrprrri qe of Tpmpru 1 against loss of money or other property, real (hereinafter called "Subscriber") to its services, or for which the Subscriber is legally liable, which fraudulent or dishonest act, as hereinafter defined, alone or in collusion with others, and for which the Cal ifnrnia (hereinafter called "Obligee"), or personal, belonging to any and all subscribers in which the Subscriber has a pecuniary interest, or the Subscriber shall sustain as the result of any of an Employee or Employees of the Obligee acting Obligee is liable, the amount of indemnity on each of such Employees being Twenty-five thni rnanr1 and nn/ 1 on Dollars ($25 pp©©oo THE FOREGOING AGREEMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND LIMITATION TERM OF BOND: SECTION 1. The term of this bond begins with the 75th day of June 19_9_L at 12:00 o'clock night, standard time, at the address of the Obligee above given, and ends at [2:00 o'clock night standard time, on the effective date of the cancellation of this bond in its entirety. DISCOVERY PERIOD: SECTION 2. Loss is covered under this bond only (a) if sustained through any act or acts committed by any Employee of Obligee while this bond is in force as to such Employee, and (h) if discovered prior to the expiration or sooner cancellation of this bond in its entirety as provided in Section 11, or from its cancellation or termination in its entirety in any other manner, whichever shall first happen. DEFINITION OF EMPLOYEE: SECTION 3. The word Employee or Employees, as used in this bond, shall he deemed to mean, respectively, one or more of the natural persons (except directors or trustees of the Obligee, if a corporation, who are not also of- ficers or employees thereof in some other capacity) while in the regular service of the Obligee in the ordinary course of the Obligee's business during the term of this bond, and whom the Obligee compensates by salary, or wages and has the right to govern and direct in the performance of such service, and who are engaged in such service within any of the States of the United States of America, or within the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, or elsewhere for a limited period, but not to mean brokers, factors, commission merchants, consignees, contractors, or other agents or representatives of the same character, FRAUDULENT OR DISHONEST ACT: SECTION 4. A fraudulent or dishonest act of an Employee of the Obligee shall mean an act which is punishable under the Criminal Code in the jurisdiction within which act occurred, for which said Employee is tried and con- victed by a court of proper jurisdiction. MERGER OR CONSOLIDATION: SECTION 5. If any natural persons shall be taken into the regular service of the Obligee through merger or con- solidation with some other concern, the Obligee shall give the Surety written notice thereof and shall pay an addi- tional premium on any increase in the number of Employees covered under this bond as a result of such merger or consolidation computed pro rata from the date of such merger or consolidation to the end of the current premium period. NON -ACCUMULATION OP LIABILITY: SECTION 6. Regardless of the number of years this bond shall continue in force and the number of premiums which shall be payable or paid, the liability of the Surety under this bond shall not be cumulative in amounts from year to year or from period to period. LIMIT OF LIABILITY UNDER THIS BOND AND PRIOR INSURANCE: SECTION 7. With respect to loss or losses caused by an Employee or which are chargeable to such Employee as provided in Section 5 and which occur partly under this bond anti partly under other bonds or policies issued by the Surety to the Obligee or to any predecessor in interest of the Obligee and terminated or cancelled or allowed to expire and in which the period ('or discovery has not expired at the time any such loss or losses thereunder are discovered, the total liability of the Surety under this bond and under such other bonds or policies shall not ex- ceed, in the aggregate, the amount carried cinder this bond on such loss or losses or the amount available to the Obligee under such other bonds or policies. as limited by the terms and conditions thereof, for any such loss or losses, if the latter amount he the larger. Form 1375 — 787 •nwi!AM m<-'' S•x IN IS SERVICE ENTERPRISES 39340 Calle Contento Temecula, California 92390 (714) 676-6246 REFERENCES The Ballatore Group 42690 Rio Nedo Temecula, CA 92590 Contact: Christine Mapes (714) 699-4555 Century 21 Realty - Newsome 29760 Rancho Calif. Rd. Suite #107 Temecula, CA 92390 Contact: Martha Newsome (714) 699-0333 Euclid Management Company 41800 Enterprise Circle S. Suite F Temecula, CA 92509 Contact: Sharon Lambeth (714) 694-5489 Hemet Christian School 825 S. Gilbert Street Hemet, CA 92342 Contact: Raymond Warwick (714) 766-1606 Industrial Commercial Properties 41161 Sandalwood Circle Murrieta, CA 92362 Contact: Cherie Jensen (714) 699-7777 FFF Enterprises 27532 Commerce Center Dr. Temecula, CA 92590 Contact: Tina Burdick (714) 695-7770 Interior Specialists 28120 Front St. Suite 204 Temecula, CA 92590 Contact: Sharon Frye (619)929-6700 Marge's Christian Bookstores 27515 Jefferson Avenue Temecula, CA 92390 Contact: Marge Kramer (714) 676-3569 New Covenant Fellowship 38030 Del Rio Rd. Temecula, CA 92390 Contact: Pastor Roger Brewer (714) 676-8852 Single Source Supply 40880 County Center Dr. Temecula, CA 92591 Contact: Gary Allen (714) 694-0977 Dr. Cort G. Stoskopf 27403 Ynez Rd. Suite #103 Temecula, CA 92390 Contact: Susan Stoskopf (714) 676-2501 M. Gomez Properties 2992 Glendale Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90039 Contact: Martha Gomez (213) 668-1132 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Recommendation: STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Les Evans, Interim Director of Public Works October 20, 1992 AGREEMENT FOR PROVIDING MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES FOR PAVEMENT REHABILITATION ON MAIN STREET AND SEVENTH STREET City Council approve the Agreement with County of Riverside to provide materials testing for Pavement Rehabilitation on Main Street and Seventh Street and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City. Fiscal Analysis: The cost of the services are expected to be about $9,000. Funds are available for materials testing in the City's Gasoline Tax Account. Background: The City Council has budgeted funds for the rehabilitation of Main Street between Camino Los Banos and Seventh Street; and for Seventh Street between Hewitt and San Jacinto Streets and from Santa Fe Avenue to State Street. Prior to preparing plans and specifications for these major paving projects, certain structural testing and materials analysis is advisable. The County of Riverside Transportation Department has the personnel and facilities to perform these analyses and have submitted a proposal for the work. The County previously provided testing for the Ramona Expressway Rehabilitation Project. a:les/matltestingservices 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 g 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AGREEMENT FOR PROVIDING MATERIALS ihSTING SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO PROJECT MAIN STREET BETWEEN 500' EAST OF CAMINO LOS BANOS TO SEVENTH STREET, SEVENTH STREET BETWEEN HEWITT AND SAN JACINTO STREET AND SEVENTH STREET BETWEEN SANTA FE AVENUE AND STATE STREET THIS AGREEMENT IS MADE and entered into this day of , by and between the County of Riverside, hereinafter called "COUNTY" and the City of San Jacinto, hereinafter called "CITY". I. PROJECT A. PROJECT LOCATION The CITY desires to do certain road improvement work on Main Street between 500' East of Camino Los Banos to Seventh Street and Seventh Street from Hewitt to San Jacinto Street and from Santa Fe Avenue to State Street, hereinafter called "PROJECT". B. PROJECT FEATURES The CITY desires to have the following services preformed by COUNTY: Core Sampling and Testing (Twelve (12) test sites), Determine about eight (8) R-Values and field evaluation, Traffic Control, Deflection Test, Report Preparation and Recommendations for rehabilitation strategy for PROJECT, also as outlined in the attached letter marked as Exhibit "A". CITY has agreed to enter into this Agreement with COUNTY and reimburse COUNTY one hundred percent (100%) of the total cost of PROJECT. 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 II. COUNTY SHALL A. Assume the responsibility for performing the necessary materials testing, sampling and coring, and outline recommendations for rehabilitation of the PROJECT, through the Transportation Department, Materials Testing Laboratory. B. Allocate all costs to CITY for the above described work. C. COUNTY shall prepare and submit to CITY, no later than thirty (30) days after the completion of PROJECT, the total cost for PROJECT. CITY's estimated share of the actual and administrative cost for PROJECT is $9,000.00. The final billing shall include all costs incurred by COUNTY in performance of PROJECT. COUNTY shall add fifteen percent (15%) of the total costs to cover administration, overhead, processing and accountir costs. III. CITY SHALL A. Deposit with COUNTY the estimated costs of $9,000.00 for PROJECT within thirty (30) days after the Agreement is fully executed. EV. GENERAL REOUIREMENTS A. Each party hereto shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless the other party, and its respective officers, agents, servants and employees of and from any and all liabilities, claims, demands, debts, suits, actions and causes of actions arising out of or in any manner connected with any act or omission of such indemnifying party hereunder, or its officers, agents, servants or employees done or performed pursuant to the terms a 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 provisions hereof. B. Any notice required or permitted to be sent under shall be sent by regular mail, addressed as follows: CITY OF SAN JACINTO P.O. Box 488 San Jacinto, CA 92538 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE P.O. Box 1090 Riverside, CA 92502 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives to this date. CITY OF SAN JACINTO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By By Title Chairman, Board of Supervisors By ATTEST: GERALD A. MALONEY Clerk of the Board By APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN County Counsel SKJ:kk By "DIIIBIT A" INTER -DEPARTMENTAL LITTER C FRANKLIN E SliERKOW Director of Transportation To: S.K. Jain Road Division Engineer From: Mike Ghahramani Associate Civil Engineer 11 U F SI TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT September 28, 1992 Re: Cost Estimate and Time Table Report Preparation. The proposed break down of cost estimate and time table requirements to prepare the materials report for the rehabilitation of Main Street from 500' east of Camino Los Banos to Seventh Street and the two segments of Seventh Street from Hewitt to San Jacinto Street and from Santa Fe Avenue to State Street in the City of San Jacinto is as follows: Work Items Estimate Cost 12 Corings, 8 R-Values and field evaluation. $3,500.00 Traffic Control 1,000.00 Deflection Test 1,000.00 Report Preparation and Reconmendations. 2,000.00 Subtotal $7,500.00 5% Contingency 375.00 Total $7,875.00 The estimate time for completion of the report is within 8 weeks. MG:dt E plinlvd on STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Les Evans, Interim Director of Public Works DATE: October 20, 1992 SUBJECT: FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SANTA ANA NPDES IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT Recommendation: Approve the First Amendment to the Santa Ana NPDES Implementation Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City. Fiscal Analysis: The addition of two cities to the regional implementation agreement will further spread the costs and should result in a slightly smaller annual contribution from the City of San Jacinto. Background: In November, 1991, the City of San Jacinto entered into a joint agreement with the County of Riverside and the Cities of Beaumont, Corona, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, Norco, Perris and Riverside for application for a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Discharge Permit issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The Cities of Canyon Lake and Calimesa have now asked to be added to the Agreement as co- permitees. No other provisions of the 1991 Agreement will be changed. axles/NPDES 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 3535 10TH STREET RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA FIRST r ' o t ' i TO THE National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Discharge Permit Implementation Agreement Santa Ana Region (Santa Ana Drainage Area) This FIRST AMENDMENT to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Discharge Permit Implementation Agreement - Santa Ana Region (herein called the NPDES AGREEMENT), made and entered into on November 19, 1991, by and between the RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, and the CITIES OF BEAUMONT, CORONA, HEMET, LAKE ELSINORE, MORENO VALLEY, NORCO, PERRIS, RIVERSIDE and SAN JACINTO (herein collectively called the PARTIES), adds additional parties to and amends Section 9. of the NPDES AGREEMENT as follows; RECITALS WHEREAS, the CITIES OF CALIMESA and CANYON LAKE have filed a written request with the RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (herein called the DISTRICT) to be added as parties to the NPDES AGREEMENT; and, WHEREAS, the DISTRICT has solicited from all PARTIES the approval or denial of the request; and, WHEREAS, all PARTIES have approved the request; and, WHEREAS, the DISTRICT has asked that the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Discharge Permit (herein called the NPDES PERMIT) issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board - Santa Ana Region be amended such -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEiN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 3535 10TH STREET RIVERSIDE CALFORN IA that the CITIES OF CALIMESA and CANYON LAKE are added as additional co-permittees; and, WHEREAS, the Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region has made the CITIES OF CALIMESA and CANYON LAKE additional co-permittees; and, WHEREAS, the PARTIES wish to clarify that they are responsible only for their own non-compliance with the NPDES AGREEMENT and PERMIT and not the non-compliance of any other PARTY; now therefore, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED that the NPDES AGREEMENT be amended as follows: 1. The CITIES OF CALIMESA and CANYON LAKE are hereby added as additional parties to the NPDES AGREEMENT in accordance with Section 7. thereof. 2. Section 9. of the NPDES AGREEMENT is amended to read as follows: wittLgreement or Permit Requirements. Except as provided in Section 5 of this agreement, any party found in non-compliance with the terms or provisions of this agreement or with the conditions of the NPDES Permit within its jurisdictional boundaries shall be solely liable for any lawfully assessed penalties. Common or joint penalties shall be calculated and allocated between the parties according to the formula outlined in Section 5 of this agreement." 3. This FIRST AMENDMENT shall be effective upon approval by all PARTIES to the NPDES AGREEMENT. 4. Once effective, the CITIES OF CALIMESA and CANYON -2- 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 3E35 - 10TH STREET RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA LAKE shall comply with all provisions of the NPDES PERMIT and the NPDES AGREEMENT and shall be responsible for their pro rata share of the shared costs discussed in Section 5. of the agreement for the current and any subsequent budget year. 5. Except as specifically provided herein, all provisions of the NPDES AGREEMENT shall remain the same. 6. This FIRST AMENDMENT may be executed and delivered in any number of counterparts or copies ("counterpart") by the PARTIES hereto. When each PARTY has signed and delivered at least one counterpart to the other PARTIES hereto, each counterpart shall be deemed an original and, taken together, shall constitute one and the same FIRST AMENDMENT, which shall be binding and effective as to the PARTIES hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, all PARTIES have caused this FIRST AMENDMENT to be executed and attested by its proper officers thereunto duly authorized, their official seals to be hereto affixed, as of the date written. Dated: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WAr CONSERVATION DISTRICT By Chairman, Board of Supervisors RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL this ATTEST: day of , 199 Gerald A. Maloney Clerk of the Board KENNETH L. EDWARDS Chief Engineer By Deputy KAL:re 6761it p.14-28 (SEAL) -3- 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 3535 10TH STREET RIVERSIDE, rl IFORNIA Dated: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By Chairman, Board of Superviso APPROVED AS TO FORM this ATTEST: day of , 199 GERALD A. MALONEY WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN Clerk of the Board County Counsel By By Deputy Deputy (SEAL) -4- APPROVED AS TO FORM this day of , 199 CITY OF BEAUMONT By Mayor ATTEST: By 5 By City Clerk City Attorney 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 WILLIAM C KATZENSTE1N COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE KO 3535 1OTH STREET RIVERSIDE. CALiFORNIA (SEAL) -5- Dated: CITY OF CALIMESA By Mayor 3 ATTEST: By City Clerk (SEAL) WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 3535 10TH STREET RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA APPROVED AS TO FORM this day of , 199 City Attorney -6- Dated: CITY OF CANYON LAKE By Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM this ATTEST: day of , 199 City Attorney WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN COUNT"( COUNSEL SUITE 30E 3535 - TOTH STREET RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA By City Clerk (SEAL) -7- Dated: CITY OF CORONA By Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM this ATTEST: day of , 199 By City Clerk (SEAL) City Attorney 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 WILLIAM C KATZENSTEIN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 3535 10TH STREET RWERSIDE, CALIFORNIA -8- Dated: CITY OF HEMET APPROVED AS TO FORM this day of , 199 City Attorney 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 3535 10TH STREET RIVERSDE CALIFOP.NIA By Mayor ATTEST: By City Clerk (SEAL) -9- 2 3 ATTEST: By City Clerk (SEAL) Dated: CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE By Mayor 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 3535 10TH STREET RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA, APPROVED AS TO FORM this day of , 199 By City Attorney -10- Dated: CITY OF MORENO VALLEY By Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM this ATTEST: day of , 199 By City Clerk (SEAL) City Attorney 17 18 19 20 21 22 WILLIAM C KATZENSTEIN COUNTS' -COUNSEL SUITE 300 3535 - 10TH STREET RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA -11- 2 3 ATTEST: By City Clerk (SEAL) Dated: CITY OF NORCO By Mayor 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2 27 28 WILLIAM C KATZENSTEIN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 3535 10TH STREET RIVERSIDE CAUFORNIA APPROVED AS TO FORM this day of , 199 By City Attorney -12- 2 4 5 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLAMCKMZENSTEN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 3S35 90TH STREET RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA Dated: CITY OF PERRIS By Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM this ATTEST: day of , 199 By By City Clerk City Attorney (SEAL) -13- 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN COUNTY COUNSEL SUITE 300 3535 10TH STREET RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA Dated: CITY OF RIVERSIDE By Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM this ATTEST: day of , 199 By City Clerk (SEAL) By City Attorney -19- 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN COUNT COUNSEL SUITE 300 3535 - 10TH STREET RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA Dated: CITY OF SAN JACINTO By Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM this ATTEST: day of , 199 By By City Clerk City Attorney (SEAL) -15- CITY OF SAN JACINTO STAFF REPORT TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS VIA PAMELA EASTER, CITY MANAGER FROM: RICHARD VRYHEID, MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT DATE: OCTOBER 20, 1992 SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF 1989 GMC DUMP TRUCK RECOMMENDATION: Approve the purchase a 1989 GMC Dump truck from Valenti & Sons for the amount of $19,550 plus $1515.13 tax for a total of $21,065.13. FISCAL ANALYSIS: All funds for the purchase of this vehicle will come from GAS TAX in account 21-8210-5400. This account has $114,000 budgeted to: I. Purchase a Patch truck ($65,000) 2.Purchase a Asphalt roller ($35,000) 3.Rebuild the hydraulic lift and bed on Unit #420 1979 Chev. 2 1/2T dump truck ($14,000) To purchase this vehicle we shall use the $14,000 from Item #3 and the balance from Item #2. The roller will cost approximately $23,000 to purchase which will leave $12,000. BACKGROUND: The 1979 Chevrolet dump truck we currently are using is going to need more than just a new bed and hydraulic lift. The engine and transmission will need more maintenance to keep it functional and will be down for repairs the more we use it. Rather than sell it , I would recommend we use it for a back up and for light hauling. This will increase its life expectancy and not cause the City any hardship with a lot of down time. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor an.d Members of the City Council Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development via Pamela S Easter, City Manager October 20, 1992 ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 963, RELATED TO COMPATIBILITY ORDINANCE 5-92 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council Adopt Ordinance No.963, waive the reading of the ordinance in full and read by title only. BACKGROUND On October 6, 1992, the City Council introduced Zoning Ordinance No. 963 which approved Zoning Ordinance Amendment 5-92 (The Compatibility Ordinance). Approved By: Brian McNahh Director of Community Development ORDINANCE NO. 963 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO CREATING COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT RECITALS WHEREAS, the City's adopted Mission Statement includes "Creating a well planned and balanced community" WHEREAS, the City strategic plan policy includes the following affordable housing goals: 1. We should guaranty that all citizens have an equal opportunity to obtain housing of their choice which is within their means. 2. We must develop a community sense of pride and togetherness among all the many neighborhoods in San Jacinto. 3. We should promote the concept of attractive, quality, safe residential environments that meet individual, social, cultural and personal needs of our residents. 4. We should seek funding help to provide housing for people whose needs cannot be met by the private market. Incentives are needed for communities and neighborhoods to include such housing. WHEREAS, the City strategic plan policy includes the following neighborhood preservation goals. 1. We must affirm that living in San Jacinto assumes certain responsibilities towards ones neighbors and the community. 2. We should develop, maintain and preserve socially healthy neighborhoods. Socially healthy neighborhoods are defined as providing safety, convenience, and a feeling of community identity to its residents. Socially healthy neighborhoods include elements such as: A. Proximity to jobs, schools, and day care facilities. B. Ethnic and economic diversity C. Nearby convenience commercial D. Neighborhoods that allow for the interaction of neighbors with each other. E. Recreational facilities close to or within the neighborhood F. Potential mixing of certain commercial uses with residential uses G. A sense of security H. Retention of property values WHEREAS, the City desires to develop regulations consistent with its strategic plan policies. WHEREAS, assuring compatibility helps to sustain property values WHEREAS, homebuyers are desirous of being assured new development will sustain or enhance their property values WHEREAS, homebuyers wish to be assured that neighboring development will be compatible with their homes. THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1, ARTICLE 3A OF ORDINANCE 340 IS ESTABLISHED, AS FOLLOWS: 3A.00 The following regulations apply to all homes proposed for construction in the City, whether on an individual lot or as a part of a subdivision, in order to promote neighborhood compatibility. 3A.01 DESIGN CRITERIA The following apply to all single family homes proposed for construction in the City: A. MINIMUM HOUSE SIZE 1. The minimum house size shall be not less than 1000 sq. ft. in all non -senior citizen subdivisions that were recorded after November 20, 1987, where the majority of the lots in the subdivision are 7500 sq. ft. or less. For subdivisions where a majority of the lots are greater than 7500 sq. ft. the minimum house size is 1200 sq. ft. If, due to the irregular shape of the original parcel, a majority of the lots are greater than 7500 sq. ft. in size, but the lots which are of normal configuration are 7500 sq. ft., the subdivision shall be considered as having 7500 sq. ft. lots. B. MINIMUM HOUSE SIZE SENIOR CITIZEN DEVELOPMENT The minimum house size in a senior citizen development is 800 sq. ft. unless specified elsewhere in the zoning ordinance. 2 C. MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE The maximum total lot coverage is 40% of the lot area, unless the lot is part of an overall development incorporating common open space, such as a Planned Unit Development. Any solid roofed structure or partially roofed structure (such as a lattice patio cover) shall be considered coverage. D. BUILDING DESIGN -GENERALLY All newly constructed homes shall be consistent with one of the following standards: 1. The City's adopted design standard 2. An alternate design standard approved as part of a development agreement. 3. In the absence of (i) or (ii) above, the building design shall be consistent with, or an improvement to, the design of homes in the area as to bulk, scale, materials, and street scene. 4. All homes shall be designed to accommodate a minimum of a 160 sq. ft. covered patio, accessed by a door, within the maximum lot coverage, without encroaching into the required set backs. 3A.02 DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUIREMENT A development plan shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of a building permit for any lot within a subdivision recorded after November 20, 1987. The forementioned development plan shall be consistent with these regulations, and shall include floor plans, elevations, precise grading plans, and typical front yard landscaping. 3A.03 CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Development projects ultimately containing more than one subdivision shall be accompanied by a conceptual development plan which includes an estimated square footage and lot size for each subdivision or planning area. The conceptual development plan required by this section shall be replaced by a comprehensive development plan in accordance with these regulations at the earliest possible time as required by this Ordinance, but in no case later than an application for a building permit. 3A.04 AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT PLAN Development plans may be amended from time to time. All amendments shall be consistent with the regulations set forth by this Article. 3A.05 DETERMINING COMPATIBILITY Housing within any development shall meet the following standards: A. DETERMINING THE SPHERE OF COMPATIBILITY 1. New housing proposals shall be compatible to existing or proposed housing within the "Sphere of Compatibility", which is the area most likely to be impacted or affected by the size, architecture, or landscaping of the new housing. The City shall provide the applicant with a map delineating the sphere of compatibility for the area proposed for new project. For purposes of this section a project is defined as all lots proposed for development. For the purposes of this section, the sphere review shall include existing homes and lots for which development plans have been approved. 2. The sphere of compatibility shall include the following property: a. Any 20,000 sq. ft. lot, or smaller portion thereof, located within 160 feet of the project which is both on the opposite side of the street and facing the same street as the project. b. Any 20,000 sq. ft. lot, or smaller or portion thereof, located within 300 ft. of the project which is both on the same side of the street as the project and facing the same street as the project. 3. Only those portions of a project with street frontage common to other lots shall have a sphere of compatibility. 4. A project may have multiple spheres of compatibility. 4 B REQUIRED FLOOR AREA IN SPHERE OF COMPATIBILITY The proposed housing for the portion of a project having a sphere of compatibility shall be no smaller than 75% of the average housing size within the sphere of compatibility, but in no case smaller than the minimum house size required by 3A.01. If the proposed housing is larger than the average housing in the sphere of compatibility, appropriate transitioning in size shall take place as determined by the Director of Community Development and/or the Planning Commission. C. AVERAGE SIZE AT PROJECT BUILD OUT Where a project with multiple floor plans is constructed in phases, the average house square footage of the total project at buildout, shall not be less than 95% of the model average. When variations in excess of 95% is proposed a revised development plan shall be submitted for review and approval. D. MAXIMUM SIZE DIFFERENTIAL WITHIN A SUBDIVISION In projects where multiple floor plans are proposed, the maximum size range allowed within a subdivision is determined by the following formula: (Square footage of smallest home)X(Number of floor plans) X .20%=Greatest difference allowed between smallest and largest units. E. VARIATIONS TO MAXIMUM SIZE DIFFERENTIAL 1. A project under construction and selling may request up to a 5% variation from subsection D, above. 2. If a subdivision has more than 33% of its lots in multiple size ranges, the constant of the above formula (.20) may be increased by .05% for each size range in the subdivision. For purposes of this sub -section, multiple size ranges shall be: Less than 6000 sq. ft. lot 6001 - 7500 sq. ft. lot 7501 - 10,000 sq. ft. lot 10,001 - 15,000 sq. ft. lot 15,000 - 20,000 sq. ft. lot 5 F. PARKING CONSISTENCY A three car garage shall be provided at approximately 50% of the ratio as existing homes within the sphere of compatibility. G. LANDSCAPE CONSISTENCY Lots having a sphere of compatibility shall be landscaped with plant materials which are consistent as to type and maturity with other landscaped lots within the sphere. This may necessitate the planting of larger specimen trees and plants, and/or the installation of sod. For the purposes of this ordinance, larger specimen trees and plants shall not exceed 48" box trees and 5 gallon shrubs. All plant material shall meet City standards and is subject to inspection and acceptance by the City. H. BUILDING DESIGN - SPECIFICALLY 1. Lots having a sphere of compatibility shall be designed to be consistent with other homes within the sphere as to bulk, scale, width, and street scene. 2. New homes shall be required to integrate the colors and materials of homes within the sphere of compatibility. 3. New housing immediately adjacent to existing housing, but not within a sphere of compatibility, shall be generally consistent as to bulk, scale, and color. 3A.06 APPROVALS The Community Development Department is empowered to review and approve development plans meeting these compatibility standards unless this Ordinance requires a development plan to be approved by the Planning Commission. The applicant may appeal any decision made by staff to the Planning Commission upon the receipt of the proper application and payment of the appeal fee. 3A.07 INAPPLICABILITY - GENERALLY The following development projects shall be governed by Section 3A.01, exclusively. A. Lots greater than 20,000 sq. ft. B. Subdivisions lots created prior to November 20, 1987 6 3A.08 INAPPLICABILITY - SPECIFICALLY These regulations are not applicable to any project that has an approved development plan prior to November 20, 1992 or to any projects where compatibility standards are set by development agreement. 3A.09 AMENDMENTS TO EXEMPT PROJECTS Should an amended development plan be submitted for a project exempt from these regulations, the amended development plan shall comply with the regulations to the greatest extent possible. SECTION 2 RIGHT OF APPEAL The formulas and averages used in this ordinance shall establish minimum standards only. The Director of Community Development, when empowered to review a development plan, may deny such an application when it is found to be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of persons residing or working in the area and/or which is found to impact in a substantially negative manner the economic value, habitability or enjoyability of properties in the neighborhood. Neighborhood is defined as those areas within sphere of compatibility of the project site. Such decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission. Decisions of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. The City Council decision is final. SECTION 3 FEE FOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW The fee to review a development plan with multiple floor plans is $500.00, but may be amended from time to time by a resolution of the City Council. SECTION 4 VALIDITY The San Jacinto City Council hereby declares that should any section, paragraph, sentence or work of this Ordinance or of the City Municipal Code hereby adopted be declared for any reason to be invalid, it is the intent of the City Council that it would have passed all other portions of this Ordinance independent of the elimination here from of any such portions as may be declared invalid. SECTION 5 DATE OF EFFECT This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its approval as required by law. The city Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and 7 cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 6th day of October , 1992. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1992 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST Mayor Deputy City Clerk CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of , 1992. City Clerk 8 STAFF REPORT DATE: October 20, 1992 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: Salary - City Clerk and City Treasurer RECOMMENDATION: Waive the full reading of Ordinance No. and read by title only; Introduce Ordinance No. (First Reading) establishing bonds and salary for City Clerk and City Treasurer. FISCAL IMPACT: This is a non -budgeted item and will result in increased expenditures from the General Fund. BACKGROUND: The City Council previously received a recommendation from the Council Administrative Subcommittee recommending an increase in salary for these positions. At that time the Council directed staff to prepare the necessary documents to implement increase effective January 1, 1993. Historically the city has established the City Clerk and City Treasurer Salaries by ordinance, an ordinance is required to repeal the previous actions. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ORDINANCE 238, AND ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF BOND AND SALARY FOR THE CITY CLERK AND CITY TREASURER THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto shall receive for his/her service as such the salary of $125.00 per month. SECTION 2. The City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto shall furnish to said city a bond in the penal sum of $5,000, for the performance of his/her official duties as required by law. SECTION 3. The City Treasurer of the City of San Jacinto shall receive for his/her service as such the salary of $125.00 per month. SECTION 4. The City Treasurer of the City of San Jacinto shall furnish to said city a bond in the penal sum of $5,000, for the performance of his/her official duties as required by law. SECTION 5. Ordinance 238 and all other ordinances or parts of ordinances of said city which are in conflict herewith are hereby repealed and this ordinance shall become effective January 1, 1993. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of November, 1992, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Francis R. Boykin, Mayor ATTEST: Maurice Armster, City Clerk STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Les Evans, Interim Director of Public Works DATE: October 20, 1992 SUBJECT: VISTA MURRIETA CORPORATION GRAND AVENUE WATER FILTRATION SYS'I EM Recommendation: 5�9 Accept the Grand Avenue Water FiltrationSystem and authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion. Background and Analysis: On November 11, 1991, the City Council awarded the contract for installation of the Grand Avenue Water Filtration System to Vista Murrieta Corporation. The bid amount was $444,803. The project has been satisfactorily completed with no change orders. a:les/VistaMurrieta WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City Clerk City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92383 NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR RECORDERS USE ONLY Notice is hereby given by the undersigned owner, a political subdivision of the State of California, that a public work of improvement described as ftirni shi ng and installation of an automatic pressure type manganese removal system. has been completed and was accepted by the undersigned awarding authority on the date hereof. The contractor on such work was Vi sta Murri Pta Corporal- inn and the surety bond is with Clarendon National Insurance Company The real property upon which said work was performed is in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of California and described as: (Legal description or street address or other specific location) Grand Avenue Well at the corner of Grand Avenue and Industrial Way Date: City of San Jacinto (Date of Acceptance) (Name of'Polit+cal Subdivision) STATE OF CALIFORNIA) 55 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) Title I hereby certify that I am the of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California the political subdivision which executed the foregoing notice and on whose behalf I make this verification; that I have read said notice, know its contents, and that the same is true. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at San Jacinto. California on (Date) Deputy City Clerk 5.10 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Les Evens, Interim Director of Public Works DATE: October 20, 1992 SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR EXPENDITURE OF GASOLINE TAX FOR REPAIR OF PARK AVENUE BETWEEN SONOMA DRIVE AND SOUTH CITY LIMITS Recommendation: Authorize the expenditure of $20,000 to participate in a City of Hemet Project to repair Park Avenue. Fiscal Analysis: The approved City budget includes $100,000 of gasoline tax funds for unspecified pavement repairs. Approval of this project would diminish that amount by $20,000. Background and Analysis: The City of Hemet has awarded a major street rehabilitation project to Matich Corporation. Park Avenue is one of the streets scheduled for repaving under the Matich Contract. A portion of Park Avenue at the northeast side of Park Hill is half in the City of Hemet and half in the City of San Jacinto. The City of Hemet has asked if we would like them to include our half of the street in their project. Approximately 26,000 square feet of pavement on the north side of Park Avenue between Sonoma Drive and North Meridian Street are within San Jacinto City limits and badly in need of resurfacing. The estimated cost of the work is $20,000 which was the result of a formal bid process through the City of Hemet. a:les/parkavenue TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and City Council Members, Brian K. McNabb, Director of Community Development via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager October 20, 1992 CONCEPTUAL SPECIFIC PLAN 1-91, CHANGE OF ZONE 11-91 AND RELATED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT APPLICANT: Peacock-Radaker Corporation 1655 E. Sixth Street, Unit A4A Corona, CA 91719 RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: 1. Confirm that the Sunrise Ranch Final Environmental Impact Report adequately evaluates environmental impacts related to the future development of the project and provides adequate mitigation to the extent feasible and that those impacts which cannot be feasibly mitigated are outweighed by the project generated benefits to the community and that the Final EIR provides a sufficient degree of analysis to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City Environmental Guidelines that the City Council adopt a Resolution certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report. Adopt a Resolution approving Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91 as the Specific Plan of Land Use for the real property shown on the plan subject to Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval incorporated herein. Introduce an Ordinance approving Change of Zone 11-91 subject to the Findings of Fact incorporated herein and waive the reading of the Ordinance in full and read by title only. City Council Staff Report October 20, 1992 Page 2 DESCRIPTION The subject project is a request for a conceptual specific plan encompassing approximately 1,025 acres and known as Sunrise Ranch. The area is generally located east of Sanderson Avenue to Lyon Avenue, south of the Ramona Expressway. The conceptual specific plan is composed of two phases and the 220 acre San Jacinto Reservoir. Phase I encompasses 596 acres and is predominantly south of Ramona Boulevard. Phase II encompasses 209 acres and is located north of Ramona Boulevard. The 220 acre reservoir is located in the southern extreme of the specific plan project site. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) has been prepared to evaluate environmental impacts related to the future development of the project area based upon potential land use designations and zoning classifications proposed through the specific plan process. The Sunrise Ranch DEIR is considered a program Environmental Impact Report. The program FEIR provides the framework to identify probable effects which can be identified. Essentially, the program FEIR is the document which provides the structure for subsequent more detailed environmental analysis. BACKGROUND In November, 1991 the Peacock Radaker Corporation submitted the subject proposal. Staff subsequently reviewed the proposal and determined that the project may have a significant effect on the environment and required that an Environmental Impact Report he prepared. In late 1991, the 'notice of Preparation of the Draft Environmental Impact Report was prepared and distributed to interested parties, agencies or individuals to solicit their views and comments. Upon the culmination of the required 45 day review period, the applicant's consultant began the preparation of the Draft EIR. On July 2, 1992, the Notice of Completion for the Draft Environmental Impact Report was circulated for comment to agencies and interested members of the public for a forty-five day period. The review period for the DEIR ended on August 28, 1992. A total of fourteen agencies and individuals commented on the Draft EIR. Responses to their comments were prepared and sent to them 10 days prior to this meeting. All the comments and responses are included for your review in the Responses to Comments Document which is made a part of the Final EIR. The Planning Commission conducted public hearings on the proposal on September 16, 1992 and October 14, 1992. The Planning Commission Staff Reports are included for your review. City Council Staff Report October 20, 1992 Page 3 On September 16, 1992 the Planning Commission accepted testimony from Eastern Municipal Water District regarding buffering of the Sewer Treatment Facility to the southwest of the site and from Mr. Donald Holmes regarding flood control problems south of the site. Condition of Approval 23 pertains to the treatment plant buffering and Condition of Approval 4 pertains to required flood control improvements to implement the Master Drainage Plan. The Commission ordered the preparation of the Final Environmental Impact Report at this meeting. On October 14, 1992, the Commission held a subsequent public hearing at which they recommended that the Final EIR be certified and that the Conceptual Specific Plan and Change of Zone be approved. There was no additional testimony received at this meeting. Respectfully submitted, Brian K. McNabb Director of Community Development Attachments: 1. Planning Commission Staff Reports with related attachments dated September 16 and October 14, 1992 2. Resolution of Final EIR Certification 3. Resolution of Approval of Conceptual Specific Plan 4. Ordinance of Approval of Change of Zone City Council Staff Report October 20, 1992 Page 4 FINDINGS OF FACT CSP 1-91/CZ 11-91 1. The conceptual Specific Plan will result in an increase in density for the project area from agricultural uses to 3.7 dwellings per gross acre. 2. A mapped seismic special studies zone dissects the subject site. Mitigation measures would be that no structures he permitted in the fault zone area plus a setback of 50 feet. To accommodate the fault zone, the proponent provides 5.5 acres open space areas diagonally across the development and adjacent to Sanderson Avenue. Furthermore, all structures will be required to be constructed in accordance with the earthquake standards of the Uniform Building Code. Additionally, it will be recommended that foundation reinforcement be considered to minimize the potential for liquefaction in those areas that are susceptible. The mitigation measures indicated above will included as Conditions of Approval for the CSP. 3. The conceptual Specific Plan will generate a need for a fire station in or near the subject site. A condition has been added which will require that a fire station be constructed and equipped prior to any occupancy of dwellings related to the CSP. Additionally, as mitigation for the project, the developer would be subject to the fire mitigation fee and he required to join the public safety community facilities district. 4. There will have to extensive upgrades to existing sewer and water facilities to serve the site. The CSP has prepared a master sewer and water plan in conjunction with the Northwest Plan. Proper facilities will have to constructed and extensions made to service individual development proposals. 5. A biological report was conducted and discussed in the Draft EIR which concluded that the area is foraging habitat for raptors and that jurisdictional wetlands exist. Mitigation of these impacts will be required including the provision or participation in the establishment of new wetlands and foraging areas. 6. The project will impact the ability for the school district to provide adequate educational facilities. The City and the School District entered into a Cooperation Agreement which requires that all new developments participate in a financing district. The CSP identified conceptual school sites to ensure school impacts are considered and mitigated early in the development process. 7. The project will generate a need for improved flood control facilities. Flood control impacts will be mitigated by the potential provision of an interim retention basin, debris basins and grass lined channels throughout the development. The grass lined channels will primarily convey flood waters but will also be used to provide bikeways and trails across the development. City Council Staff Report October 20, 1992 Page 5 8. The CSP will generate an impact upon the park and recreation facilities of the City. The necessary mitigation related to the development is 40 acres of active recreation area. Improvements to the park space will include landscaping, ballfields, hard courts and play lots 9. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared pursuant to State law and is intended to serve as an informational document by providing full disclosure of the potential impacts related to the project. 10. All significant effects on the environment due to the issues listed below will be lessened to the extent feasible at the appropriate time. a. Alteration of drainage patterns and downstream water quality. b. Incremental decrease of biological resources. c. Alteration of existing land use patterns. d. Incremental decrease of natural resources. 11. The significant effects on the environment related to air quality, soils and agriculture, and traffic and circulation are found to be unavoidable are considered as acceptable due to the potential benefits related to the project. 12. The project will not create any conditions that will be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 13. The project is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan and implements the requirements of the Planned Community Development zone of Ordinance No. 340. 14, The project is consistent with the City and the 2010 Committee Mission Statements by providing a well planned and balanced community, offering additional educational, recreational, employment and cultural opportunities. City Council Staff Report October 20, 1992 Page 6 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Prior to any development related to this approval, a comprehensive development plan shall be approved. 2. Prior to the occupancy of the first dwelling within the Specific Plan area, adequate fire protection shall exist. Temporary fire facilities may be acceptable until the first 500 dwellings are constructed and occupied, at which time a permanent fire station shall be under construction. 3. Prior to the approval of any comprehensive specific plan, park plans indicating the necessary improvements and construction schedule for the required 40 acres of park land shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval. Said plans shall he based upon the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) standards as indicated by Valley -Wide Recreation arid Park District staff. Parks shall he constructed and dedicated to the City simultaneously with the initial certificates of occupancy related to the dwellings within the subject planning area. 4. Prior to occupancy, the appropriate flood protection (levee construction, raised pads, master drainage plan implementation) shall be constructed to remove all portions of the site from the flood plain. Implementation of the master drainage plan shall include the area from Seventh Street to the southern project boundary.Flood control improvements include the provision of detention basins, debris basins and grass lined channels throughout the development. 5. Prior to occupancy of any structure within the dam inundation zone, an emergency evacuation route shall be approved by the Fire Chief, Police Chief and the Director of Public Works. 6. No structures shall be permitted in the fault zone area plus a setback as determined by a seismic study. All structures shall he constructed in accordance with the earthquake standards of the Uniform Building Code. Foundation reinforcement to eliminate liquefaction in those areas that are susceptible shall be provided subject to subsequent soils reports for each implementing development. Each purchaser of property within the fault zone shall be notified of the potential impacts related to ground shaking. 7. Prior to removal of any jurisdictional wetlands, the necessary federal and state permits and agreements shall be obtained. Replacement wetland habitat shall not be less than 8.8 acres. City Council Staff Report October 20, 1992 Page 7 8. Prior to any removal of raptor foraging habitat, the applicant shall enhance existing raptor habitat, contribute toward replacement habitat or purchase land for permanent open space as determined by a qualified biologist and to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Department. 9. The applicant shall dedicate and improve the special 25 foot scenic landscaped setback adjacent to Sanderson Avenue during Phase I and the Ramona Expressway during Phase II. Enhanced entry treatment shall be provided at all project entries, plans to include landscaping and wall treatment shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Community Development. 10. The applicant shall construct and dedicate Lyon Avenue, south of Ramona Expressway to De Anza Drive to its ultimate 100 foot section, subject to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Standards. 11. The applicant shall construct and dedicate Potter Road, south of Ramona Expressway to Ramona Boulevard to its ultimate 88 foot section, and south of Ramona Boulevard to the southern site boundary to its ultimate 66 foot section, subject to the City Public Works Standards. P. The applicant shall realign, construct and dedicate Ramona Boulevard, between Sanderson Avenue and Lyon Avenue to its ultimate 100 foot section subject to the City Public Works Standards. 13. The applicant shall realign, construct and dedicate De Anza Drive, from Lyon Avenue to the project east boundary to its ultimate 88 foot section subject to the City Public Works Standards. 14. The applicant shall construct and dedicate Sanderson Avenue to its ultimate 134 foot section from the north side of the Ramona Expressway/Sanderson Avenue intersection to southerly site boundary, subject to the City Public Works Standards. 15. The applicant shall construct and dedicate Ramona Expressway to its 142 foot section from the west side of the Ramona Expressway/Sanderson Avenue intersection to easterly site boundary, subject to the City Public Works Standards. 16. The applicant shall construct and dedicate Lyon Avenue, south of De Anza Drive to the southern site boundary to its ultimate half -width plus 2 feet per a 100 foot street section, subject to the City Public Works Standards. City Council Staff Report October 20, 1992 Page 8 17. Traffic signals at the following intersections shall be provided when determined by the appropriate warrants performed for each subsequent entitlement, subject to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer: a. Ramona Expressway/Potter Road b. Ramona Expressway/Lyon Avenue c. Sanderson Avenue/Ramona Boulevard d. Ramona Boulevard/Potter Road e. Ramona Boulevard/Lyon Avenue f. Lyon Avenue/De Anza Drive 18. All public improvements shall conform to the Standards and Specification of the City of San Jacinto. 19. The applicant shall work with all applicable utility purveyors to ensure that all are available to serve the site prior to the issuance of a building permit related to this approval. All utilities shall he underground. 20. The applicant shall coordinate with the Police and Fire Departments prior to any final map approval for the formation of a community facilities district for the provision public safety services. 21. Prior to the approval of any subsequent entitlement related to this approval, the developer shall coordinate with the school district to participate in the formation and establishment of a community facilities district and the issuance of honds thereby, and/or participate in other satisfactory alternative financing programs to finance educational facilities. 22. Prior to the approval of any subsequent entitlement, an acoustical analysis shall be performed to confirm adequate noise mitigation is provided to ensure that on -site outdoor noise levels do not exceed 65 db CNEL and indoor noise levels do not exceed 45 db CNEL. To further reduce noise impacts, construction adjacent to residences shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM Monday through Saturday. 23. No residential development shall be permitted within 1200 feet from the outer boundary of the existing Eastern Municipal Water District waste water treatment plant. The resultant amount of open -space within the 1200 foot buffer zone shall be densely planted with trees to minimize potential odors. Also, the developer shall provide new and subsequent residents notice as to the proximity of the treatment plant. City Council Staff Report October 20, 1992 Page 9 24. Prior to the occupancy of the 500th dwelling unit within Phase I, the developer shall provide documentation of participation in or establishment of a program toward the creation of 500 jobs within the City, subject to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. Said jobs are to meet the SCAG affordability criterion as established in the Regional Growth Management Plan. 25. Prior to the approval of any subsequent entitlement, the final master plan of trails shall be submitted to the Community Development Department demonstrating that all planning areas are linked to all schools, parks and the commercial/industrial areas via the bicycle and pedestrian trail system. 26. Prior to the approval of a subsequent entitlement which is in the immediate vicinity of 37801 Ramona Boulevard and 1579 De Anza Drive, an archeological evaluation to determine the historic value of said structures shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. 27. Prior to the approval of any subsequent entitlement, landscape plans shall be submitted which include the planting of native trees and plants. Said plans shall incorporate provisions to preserve existing large trees wherever possible. Further, the applicant coordinate the landscape architect with a qualified biologist to ensure that planned open -space areas such as the grass -lined channels and fault zones can he planted with native plant species to provide attractive habitat for the woodland bird species and other biotic resources. 28. Prior to the occupancy of the first dwelling unit within Phase I, the developer shall provide documentation of participation in or establishment of a program toward the financing for the construction of regional off -site roadways impacted by this project. The project shall participate in a City-wide bridge and thoroughfare district upon the establishment of said district. 29. Prior to the occupancy of the first dwelling unit within Phase I, the developer shall provide documentation that the project proponent is working with the County Free Library System toward the mitigation of impacts upon library level of service impacts as indicated in the Final Environmental Impact Report. 30. Prior to the approval of any subsequent entitlement, a phasing plan delineating all required improvements shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval. All required improvements shall be installed pursuant to said phasing plan. City Council Staff Report October 20, 1992 Page 10 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATING MONITORING 1. Developer shall provide a Declaration stating how all significant environmental concerns and mitigation measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report will he implemented, prior to the approval of any Comprehensive Specific Plan, Upon the approval of the Declaration, it shall be noticed any Final Map and recorded simultaneously. 3. Upon the start of construction, at six month intervals, and prior to occupancy the developer shall provide a status report relating to compliance with the mitigating measures. 4, Prior to occupancy, the City shall verify compliance with the mitigating measures. .JI - 3,3. STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Hixson and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian Mc Nabb, Director of Community Development DATE: October 14, 1992 SUBJECT: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND CONCEPTUAL SPECIFIC PLAN 1-91 AND CHANGE OF ZONE 11-91 APPLICANT: PEACOCK-RADAKER CORPORATION 1635 East Sixth Street, Unit A4A Corona, CA 91719 (714) 272-6660 ENGINEER: NBS/LOWRY 1545 West Florida Avenue Hemet, CA 92344 (714) 658-7116 DESCRIPTION The subject project is a request for a conceptual specific plan and an accompanying change of zone encompassing approximately 1,025 acres and known as Sunrise Ranch. The area is generally located east of Sanderson Avenue to Lyon Avenue, south of the Ramona Expressway. The conceptual specific plan is composed of two phases and the 220 acre San Jacinto Reservoir. Phase I encompasses 596 acres and is located predominantly south of Ramona Boulevard as re -aligned. Phase I is under direct control of Peacock-Radaker, the master developer for the project. Phase II encompasses 209 acres, is located north of Ramona Boulevard (re -aligned) and is controlled by various landowners whose land is primarily in agricultural production yet are cooperating with Peacock-Radaker in the process. The 220 acre reservoir, owned by Eastern Municipal Water District, is located in the southern extreme of the specific plan project site. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) has been prepared to evaluate environmental impacts related to the future development of the project area based upon potential land use designations and zoning classifications proposed through the specific plan process. The Sunrise Ranch DEIR is considered a program Environmental Impact Report. The program DEIR provides the framework to identify probable effects which can be identified. Essentially, the program DEIR is the document which provides the structure for subsequent more detailed environmental analysis. PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1992 PAGE NO. 1 BACKGROUND At your last meeting, September 16, 1992, this project was considered and continued to this meeting. The Commission did order the preparation of the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) but continued action on the Conceptual Specific Plan and Change of Zone. Additionally, Staff and the applicant had met earlier and were not in total agreement on the Conditions of Approval. Therefore, the Commission directed Staff to review and finalize the Conditions based upon Commission and applicant comments. Per your direction, Staff has conducted further review of the project, the comments received by other agencies and the comments received by the applicant, This subsequent review presents the following analysis for your review: Parks The Draft EIR indicates that approximately 2.2 acres of jurisdictional wetlands (drainage pond) is located within a potential park site in northern portion of Phase I. If the future park is indeed to he located in this location, the 2.2 acre drainage pond could not be calculated as active park space. The rational for this, is the federal Clean Water Act does not allow any net decrease in wetlands. Therefore, if the retention of the drainage pond is considered to not be a decrease in wetlands habitat by the Fish and Wildlife Service, this should not be counted as credit toward the City Park Ordinance. If credit is to be given for the retention of the drainage pond, it should be against the 8.8 acres required to be set aside for protected wetlands as recommended by the biologist. To allow the developer to utilize the drainage pond as acreage toward required park space, would constitute double credit and would severely limit the City's ability to provide the minimum recommended recreational facilities to our residents. Biology As discussed in the previous Staff Report, the project site includes several ponds and seasonally wet areas. According to the biological survey, three areas on the subject site meet federal wetlands criteria or are year -around open water. These areas support riparian woodland providing habitat for riparian -associated birds and large native and non-native trees and plants. Additionally, the site includes areas which are seasonally wet which supports the smooth tarplant, a sensitive plant that is on the California Native Plant Society's list of plants for further review. The areas considered as jurisdictional wetlands are subject to the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act which, in effect, does not allow the elimination of wetlands areas. PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1992 PAGE NO. 2 As mitigation for the elimination of the sooth tarplant and large trees, Staff has conditions the project to provide planting of native trees and plants, and to preserve existing large trees wherever possible. This mitigation would provide habitat opportunities for a variety of birds and may contribute toward raptor habitat. Again, as indicated in the previous Staff Report the applicant can explore with a qualified biologist as to whether portions of the grass -lined channels and fault zones can be set aside for biotic resources. The consulting biologist for the Draft EIR recommends that planned open -space areas can be planted with native plant species to provide attractive habitat for the woodland bird species. Transportation and Circulation According to the traffic study prepared for the project, substantial amounts vehicle trips which impact off -site roadways. The traffic study indicates that 8,500 project generated vehicles per day will utilize the Ramona Expressway, west of Sanderson Avenue. Based upon accepted traffic engineering methodology approximately 10 percent of those trips will occur during peak hour. This is equivalent to half of the capacity of a lane, which is approximately 1700 trips per hour. The project generated traffic coupled with existing traffic, could approach the peak hour lane capacity. Therefore, Staff is conditioning the project to provide or participate in the financing for the construction of regional off -site roadways. The project has the potential to generate significant vehicle trips per day on Sanderson Avenue, north of the Ramona Expressway. As the roadway exists now, it is regularly subject to closure during periods of high rainfall. This situation would result in the diversion of traffic to the Ramona Expressway, further exacerbating the problem indicated above. Therefore, Staff has added a condition that prior to first occupancy related to Specific Plan, the Sanderson Avenue Bridge shall he constructed. This will preclude additional impacts to off -site intersections and roadways. Jobs/Housing Balance The project air quality analysis indicates that the project will generate enough jobs to satisfy the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) jobs housing balance ratio. While Staff agrees with this assumption, the majority of the jobs will be created by the development of Phase II. Whereas, the majority of the residential development will occur during Phase I. This late job creation would necessitate the majority of future Sunrise Ranch wage earners to commute out of the valley to work. The additional commuters would contribute additional emissions further exacerbating air quality impacts. PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1992 PAGE NO. 3 Therefore, Staff feels that project job creation should be directly related to project residential development. Based upon SCAG requirements, the project would have to generate 747 jobs which meet the SCAG affordability criterion, that is the relationship between salaries/wages and the projected range of housing prices for the project. Phase I residential development will account for approximately two-thirds of the total project housing and as such, an equal percentage of jobs should be provided. Therefore, Staff is recommending that the developer participate in a job creation program for 500 jobs within the City. Library According to the Draft EIR, the project will generate a substantial impact on library services. The Draft EIR indicates that the necessary mitigation for library impacts is equivalent of $436 per dwelling unit for capital expenses. Additionally, the Draft EIR indicates that the project would contribute to the demand for library services. Based upon the per dwelling cost for library improvements indicated in the Draft EIR, Staff has calculated the project would generate approximately $1,302,768 for library purposes. Staff feels this amount would be more than enough to fund the construction of additional branch library in the City. Staff recommends that the project proponent work with the County Free Library System toward the construction and maintenance of an additional branch library for the western portion of the City. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 92- recommending the City Council approve Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91 and Change of Zone 11-91, subject to the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval. 7 Find that the Final Environmental Impact Report adequately evaluates environmental impacts related to the future development of the project and provides adequate mitigation to the extent feasible and that those impacts which cannot be feasibly mitigated are outweighed by the project generated benefits to the community and recommend that the City Council certify the Final Environmental Impact Report /67? X( • a-1Z Timothy M. Hults Senior Planner PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1992 PAGE NO. 4 FINDINGS OF' FACT CONCEPTUAL SPECIFIC PLAN 1-91 CHANGE OF ZONE 11-91 1. The conceptual Specific Plan will result in an increase in density for the project area from agricultural uses to 3.7 dwellings per gross acre. 2. A mapped seismic special studies zone dissects the subject site. Mitigation measures would be that no structures be permitted in the fault zone area plus a setback of 50 feet. To accommodate the fault zone, the proponent provides 5.5 acres open space areas diagonally across the development and adjacent to Sanderson Avenue. Furthermore, all structures will be required to be constructed in accordance with the earthquake standards of the Uniform Building Code. Additionally, it will be recommended that foundation reinforcement be considered to minimize the potential for liquefaction in those areas that are susceptible. The mitigation measures indicated above will included as Conditions of Approval for the CSP. 3. The conceptual Specific Plan will generate a need for a fire station in or near the subject site. A condition has been added which will require that a fire station be constructed and equipped prior to any occupancy of dwellings related to the CSP. Additionally, as mitigation for the project, the developer would be subject to the fire mitigation fee and be required to join the public safety community facilities district. 4. There will have to extensive upgrades to existing sewer and water facilities to serve the site. The CSP has prepared a master sewer and water plan in conjunction with the Northwest Plan. Proper facilities will have to constructed and extensions made to service individual development proposals. 5. A biological report was conducted and discussed in the Draft EIR which concluded that the area is foraging habitat for raptors and that jurisdictional wetlands exist. Mitigation of these impacts will be required including the provision or participation in the establishment of new wetlands and foraging areas. 6. The project will impact the ability for the school district to provide adequate educational facilities. The City and the School District entered into a Cooperation Agreement which requires that all new developments participate in a financing district. The CSP identified conceptual school sites to ensure school impacts are considered and mitigated early in the development process. The project will generate a need for improved flood control facilities. Flood control impacts will he mitigated by the potential provision of an interim retention basin, debris basins and grass lined channels throughout the development. The grass lined channels will primarily convey flood waters but will also be used to provide bikeways and trails across the development. PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1992 PAGE NO. 5 S. The CSP will generate an impact upon the park and recreation facilities of the City. The necessary mitigation related to the development is 40 acres of active recreation area. Improvements to the park space will include landscaping, ballfields, hard courts and play lots 9. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared pursuant to State law and is intended to serve as an informational document by providing full disclosure of the potential impacts related to the project. 10. All significant effects on the environment due to the issues listed below will be lessened to the extent feasible at the appropriate time. a. Alteration of drainage patterns and downstream water quality. b. Incremental decrease of biological resources. c. Alteration of existing land use patterns. d. Incremental decrease of natural resources. 11. The significant effects on the environment related to air quality, soils and agriculture, and traffic and circulation are found to be unavoidable are considered as acceptable due to the potential benefits related to the project. 12. The project will not create any conditions that will be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 13. The project is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of tile General Plan and implements the requirements of the Planned Community Development zone of Ordinance No. 340. 14. The project is consistent with the City and the 2010 Committee Mission Statements by providing a well planned and balanced community, offering additional educational, recreational, employment and cultural opportunities. PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1992 PAGE NO. 6 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIREMENTS 1. Prior to any development related to this approval, a comprehensive development plan shall be approved. 2. Prior to the occupancy of the first dwelling within the Specific Plan area, a fire station shall be fully constructed, equipped, and staffed in or adjacent to the project area. 3. Prior to the approval of any comprehensive specific plan, park plans indicating the necessary improvements and construction schedule for the required 40 acres of park land shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval. Said plans shall be based upon the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) standards as indicated by Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District staff. Parks shall be constructed and dedicated to the City simultaneously with the initial certificates of occupancy related to the dwellings within the subject planning area. 4. Flood control improvements necessary to mitigate impacts form a 100-year storm shall be constructed, including the provision of detention basins, debris basins and grass lined channels throughout the development subject to a hydrology study approved by the City Engineer prior to any grading of the subject site. Prior to occupancy of any structure within the dam inundation zone, an emergency evacuation route shall be approved by the Fire Chief, Police Chief and the Director of Public Works. 6. Prior to any precise grading, the base flood elevation shall be determined and appropriate flood protection determined. 7. Prior to occupancy, the appropriate flood protection (levee construction/raised pad elevation) shall be constructed to remove any portion of the site out of the flood plain. 8. No structures shall he permitted in the fault zone area plus a setback of 50 feet. All structures shall be constructed in accordance with the earthquake standards of the Uniform Building Code. Foundation reinforcement to eliminate liquefaction in those areas that are susceptible shall be provided subject to subsequent soils reports for each implementing development. Each purchaser of property within the fault zone shall be notified of the potential impacts related to ground shaking. PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1992 PAGE NO. 7 9. Prior to removal of any jurisdictional wetlands, the necessary federal and state permits and agreements shall be obtained. Replacement wetland habitat shall not be less than 8.8 acres. 10. Prior to any removal of raptor foraging habitat, the applicant shall enhance existing raptor habitat, contribute toward replacement habitat or purchase land for permanent open space as determined by a qualified biologist and to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Department. 11. The applicant shall dedicate and improve the special 25 foot scenic landscaped setback adjacent to the Ramona Expressway and Sanderson Avenue. Enhanced entry treatment shall be provided at all project entries, plans to include landscaping and wall treatment shall be submitted to and approved by the Department of Community Development. 12. The applicant shall construct and dedicate Lyon Avenue, south of Ramona Expressway to De Anza Drive to its ultimate 100 foot section, subject to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Director. 13. The applicant shall construct and dedicate Potter Road, south of Ramona Expressway to Ramona Boulevard to its ultimate 88 foot section, and south of Ramona Boulevard to the southern site boundary to its ultimate 66 foot section, subject to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Director. 14, The applicant shall realign, construct and dedicate Ramona Boulevard, between Sanderson Avenue and Lyon Avenue to its ultimate 100 foot section subject to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Director. 15. The applicant shall realign, construct and dedicate De Anza Drive, from Lyon Avenue to the project east boundary to its ultimate 88 foot section subject to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Director. 16. The applicant shall construct and dedicate Sanderson Avenue to its ultimate 134 foot section from the north side of the Ramona Expressway/Sanderson Avenue intersection to southerly site boundary, subject to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Director. 17. The applicant shall construct and dedicate Ramona Expressway to its 142 foot section from the west side of the Ramona Expressway/Sanderson Avenue intersection to easterly site boundary, subject to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Director. PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1992 PAGE NO. 8 18. The applicant shall construct and dedicate Lyon Avenue, south of De Anza Drive to the southern site boundary to its ultimate half -width plus 2 feet per a 100 foot street section, subject to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Director. 19. Traffic signals at the following intersections shall be provided when determined by the appropriate warrants performed for each subsequent entitlement, subject to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer: a. Ramona Expressway/Potter Road b. Ramona Expressway/Lyon Avenue c. Sanderson Avenue/Ramona Boulevard d. Ramona Boulevard/Potter Road e. Ramona Boulevard/Lyon Avenue f. Lyon Avenue/De Anza Drive g. Lyon Avenue/Jeffrey Road 20. All public improvements shall conform to the Standards and Specification of the City of San Jacinto. 21. The applicant shall work with all applicable utility purveyors to ensure that all are available to serve the site prior to the issuance of a building permit related to this approval. All utilities shall be underground. 22. The applicant shall coordinate with the Police and Fire Departments prior to any final map approval for the formation of a community facilities district for the provision public safety services. 23. Prior to the approval of any subsequent entitlement related to this approval, the developer shall coordinate with the school district to participate in the formation and establishment of a community facilities district and the issuance of bonds thereby, and/or participate in other satisfactory alternative financing programs to finance educational facilities. 24. Prior to the approval of any subsequent entitlement, an acoustical analysis shall be performed to confirm adequate noise mitigation is provided to ensure that on -site outdoor noise levels do not exceed 65 db CNEL and indoor noise levels do not exceed 45 db CNEL. To further educe noise impacts, construction adjacent to residences shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM Monday through Saturday. PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1992 PAGE NO. 9 25. No residential development shall be permitted within 1200 feet from the outer boundary of the existing Eastern Municipal Water District waste water treatment plant. The resultant amount of open -space within the 1200 foot buffer zone shall be densely planted with trees to minimize potential odors. Also, the developer shall provide new and subsequent residents notice as to the proximity of the treatment plant. 26. Prior to the occupancy of the 500th dwelling unit within Phase I, the developer shall provide documentation of participation in or establishment of a program toward the creation of 500 jobs within the City, subject to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. Said jobs are to meet the SCAG affordability criterion as established in the Regional Growth Management Plan. 27. Prior to the approval of any subsequent entitlement, the final master plan of trails shall be submitted to the Community Development Department demonstrating that all planning areas are linked to all schools, parks and the commercial/industrial areas via the bicycle and pedestrian trail system. 28. Prior to the approval of a subsequent entitlement which is in the immediate vicinity of 37801 Ramona Boulevard and 1579 De Anza Drive, an archeological evaluation to determine the historic value of said structures shall be submitted to the Community Development Department. 29. Prior to the approval of any subsequent entitlement, landscape plans shall be submitted which include the planting of native trees and plants. Said plans shall incorporate provisions to preserve existing large trees wherever possible. Further, the applicant coordinate the landscape architect with a qualified biologist to ensure that planned open -space areas such as the grass -lined channels and fault zones can he planted with native plant species to provide attractive habitat for the woodland bird species and other biotic resources. 30. Prior to the occupancy of the first dwelling unit within Phase I, the developer shall provide documentation of participation in or establishment of a program toward the financing for the construction of regional off -site roadways impacted by this project. Further, prior to first occupancy related to Specific Plan, the Sanderson Avenue Bridge shall he constructed. 31. Prior to the occupancy of the first dwelling unit within Phase I, the developer shall provide documentation that the project proponent is working with the County Free Library System toward the construction and maintenance of an additional branch library for the western portion of the City. PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1992 PAGE NO. 10 32. Prior to the approval of any subsequent entitlement, a phasing plan delineating all required improvements shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval. All required improvements shall be installed pursuant to said phasing plan. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATING MONITORING 1. Developer shall provide a Declaration stating how all significant environmental concerns and mitigation measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report will be implemented, prior to the approval of any Comprehensive Specific Plan. Upon the approval of the Declaration, it shall be noticed any Final Map and recorded simultaneously. 3. Upon the start of construction, at six month intervals, and prior to occupancy the developer shall provide a status report relating to compliance with the mitigating measures. 4. Prior to occupancy, the City shall verify compliance with the mitigating measures. PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 14, 1992 PAGE NO. 11 STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Hixson and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian Mc Nabb, Director of Community Development DATE: September 16, 1992 SUBJECT: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND CONCEPTUAL SPECIFIC PLAN 1-91 AND CHANGE OF ZONE 11-91 APPLICANT: PEACOCK-RADAKER CORPORATION 1635 East Sixth Street, Unit A4A Corona, CA 91719 (714) 272-6660 ENGINEER: NBS/LOWRY 1545 West Florida Avenue Hemet, CA 92344 (714) 658-7116 DESCRIPTION The subject project is a request for a conceptual specific plan and an accompanying change of zone encompassing approximately 1,025 acres and known as Sunrise Ranch. The area is generally located east of Sanderson Avenue to Lyon Avenue, south of the Ramona Expressway. The conceptual specific plan is composed of two phases and the 220 acre San Jacinto Reservoir. Phase I encompasses 596 acres and is located predominantly south of Ramona Boulevard as re -aligned. Phase I is under direct control of Peacock-Radaker, the master developer for the project. Phase II encompasses 209 acres, is located north of Ramona Boulevard (re -aligned) and is controlled by various landowners whose land is primarily in agricultural production yet are cooperating with Peacock-Radaker in the process. The 220 acre reservoir, owned by Eastern Municipal Water District, is located in the southern extreme of the specific plan project site. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) has been prepared to evaluate environmental impacts related to the future development of the project area based upon potential land use designations and zoning classifications proposed through the specific plan process. The Sunrise Ranch DEIR is considered a program Environmental Impact Report. The program DEIR provides the framework to identify probable effects which can be identified. Essentially, the program DEIR is the document which provides the structure for subsequent more detailed environmental analysis. PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 PAGE NO. 1 EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT "B" EXHIBIT "C" EXHIBIT "D" EXHIBIT "E" EXHIBIT "F" EXHIBIT "G" EXHIBIT "H" EXHIBIT "I" EXHIBIT "J" BACKGROUND BASE MAP EXISTING LAND USE EXISTING ZONING EXISTING SURROUNDING USES EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT PROPOSED CIRCULATION ELEMENT FLOOD ZONE GEOLOGY/SEISMICITY PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN PROPOSED ZONING In November, 1991 the Peacock-Radaker Corporation submitted the subject proposal. Staff subsequently reviewed the proposal and determined that the project may have a significant effect on the environment and required that an Environmental Impact Report be prepared. In late 1991, the Notice of Preparation of the Draft Environmental Impact Report was prepared and distributed to interested parties, agencies or individuals to solicit their views and comments. Upon the culmination of the required 45 day review period, the applicant's consultant began the preparation of the Draft EIR. On July 2, 1992, the Notice of Completion for the Draft Environmental Impact Report was circulated for comment to agencies and interested members of the public for a forty-five day period. The review period for the DEIR ended on August 31st. As of the date of this Staff Report, the following agencies had responded: 1. California Department of Conservation 2. California Department of Transportation 3. Cal. Reg. Water Quality Control Board 4. Riverside County Transportation Comm. 5. Riverside County Transportation Dept. 6. Riverside County Waste Management 7. Eastern Municipal Water District 8. Metropolitan Water District 9. Sierra Club 10.Southern California Assoc. of Gov'ts 11.South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 PAGE NO. 2 Based upon the requirements of the City Environmental Guidelines, which require a Planning Commission public hearing not less than 15 nor more than 30 days after the close of Draft EIR review period, this special Planning Commission Public Hearing was necessary. In order to continue the process and approve the project, the Planning Commission must order the preparation of the Final EIR. Upon completion of the Final EIR, the Planning Commission shall forward a recommendation to the City Council. At that point, the City Council can either certify the Final EIR as written or order changes to made prior to certification. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS An Environmental Impact Report was prepared, which pursuant to CEQA shall describe and analyze potential environmental effects associated with the project and discuss ways to mitigate or avoid significant effects. The intent of an EIR is to provide a good faith effort at full disclosure of potential effects and mitigation. The Sunrise Ranch Draft EIR appears to provide a sufficient degree of analysis to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City Environmental Guidelines. The Draft EIR included all the CEQA required elements as well as considering four project alternatives (also required by CEQA). The project alternatives considered include a "Lower Density Project", "Higher Density Project", "No Project Alternative" and an "Alternate Location Project". In two of the alternative cases, the "Lower Density Project" and the "No Project Alternative", the potential environmental impacts were considered less significant and environmentally superior. However, it was determined that both alternatives failed to adequately meet the needs of the community and that the proposed project offered greater flexibility in planning and land use. Furthermore, both alternatives failed to implement the goals and objectives of General Plan and the 2010 Committee by not providing an adequate range of housing for all segments of the existing and future population of the City. Additionally, both alternatives failed to provide the necessary infrastructure for the future provision of adequate employment and service opportunities for existing and future residents. The "Higher Density Project" would result in potentially significant environmental impacts of a much greater magnitude than the project proposal. Therefore, this alternative was rejected as the project proposal is significantly environmentally superior. The "Alternate Location Project" would generate a similar project with potentially similar environmental concerns. However, precise impacts would be determined by the actual site constraints of an individual project site. Depending on ultimate location, such as in the northeast area of the City, could actually generate greater impacts to traffic, circulation and emissions as they relate additional vehicle miles traveled. Therefore, it would be appropriate to continue to consider this project at this location as opposed to this project at any alternate location. PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 PAGE NO. 3 The EIR process analyzed potential impacts of project site buildout and identified mitigation measures to adequately reduce or eliminate potential adverse impacts related to the project. Additionally, the EIR identified unavoidable adverse impacts and cumulative impacts related to the project. The project will generate unavoidable impacts on air quality, soils and agriculture, and traffic and circulation. The potential cumulative impacts generated by this proposal and related projects which may not be mitigative include: Alteration of drainage patterns and downstream water quality; Incremental decrease of biological resources; Alteration of existing land use patterns; Incremental increase in emissions, degradation of air quality; Incremental decrease of natural resources; and Loss of Prime Agricultural Lands. As a result, it will be necessary for the City Council upon the certification of the Final EIR to adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Essentially, the City Council would make the determination that the benefits of the proposal outweigh the potential adverse impacts and that the adverse impacts are acceptable. The following are potential impacts which Staff feels deserve consideration and analysis at this step: Fire Protection The Fire Department has indicated that existing Station 1 will ultimately be insufficient to provide adequate fire protection to the site, as the travel time to site would exceed the minimum 5 minute response. Therefore, Staff has conditioned the developer to construct and equip a fire station on or near the subject site prior to occupancy of any dwellings related to the project. The station would be the primary respondent for emergency situations in the northwest part of the City. Presently, the City owns property at the southeast corner of Lyon Avenue and Ramona Boulevard which has been the anticipated location a fire station. Staff recommends that the developer be given credit against the applicable fire station mitigation fee on a dollar for dollar basis until full the cost of the station is recouped. Based upon the current fee of $577/dwelling and $.34/square foot of industrial/commercial space the project would generate approximately 2.1 million dollars in fire station mitigation fees. Staff estimates the cost to construct and equip and fire station at between $800,000 and $1,000,000. The remainder of the fire mitigation fees would be paid as applicable. PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 PAGE NO. 4 Parks The proposed Specific Plan creates a need for additional park land and facilities. The goal set forth in the General Plan is 5 acres of public park per 1,000 people. Specific Plan 1-91, proposes approximately 2,988 dwelling units at build -out. Based upon the current population generation factor of the park ordinance, the population at build -out of Sunrise Ranch would be 7,935 people. Therefore, the necessary mitigation related to the entire Specific Plan based upon providing 5 acres of park for 1,000 people would be 40 acres of active recreational park land. The developer proposes to dedicate to the City 34.5 acres of land as active park space and 54.5 acres of land as flood control channel/greenbelt. Staff will condition the project to provide an additional 5.5 acres of active park land so as to ensure that the project is consistent with the General Plan. Furthermore, Staff will condition the developer to provide full improvements to the 40 acres of park land. Improvements to the park land would include tot lots, ballfields (baseball/soccer), hard courts (tennis/basketball), restrooms, and recreational buildings. The minimum improvements necessary per park would be based upon the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA) standards as indicated by Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District staff. The NRPA standards indicate the minimum recreation facilities needed to serve a community. The following represent the NRPA recommended minimum improvements based upon population: 1. Play/Tot lot - 1 per 2000 people 2. Picnic areas - 1 per 3000 people 3. Baseball (90 feet) - 1 per 6000 people 4. Softball/Youth baseball - 1 per 2000 people 5. Soccer - 1 per 2000 people 6. Basketball - 1 per 500 people 7. Volleyball - 1 per 3000 people 8. Swim Pools (25m) - 1 per 10,000 people 9. Tennis - 1 per 2000 people 10.Football - 1 per 10,000 people Once again, the standards indicated are based upon NRPA minimum standards. However, the standard indicated for soccer is not based upon NRPA standards, but is a recommended standard by Valley -Wide based upon area demand. The following facilities are recommended targets to serve the Sunrise Ranch development, based upon the above standards: 4 tot lots; 3 picnic areas; 1 regulation baseball diamond; 4 softball/youth baseball diamonds; 4 soccer fields; 16 basketball courts; 3 volleyball courts; 1 swimming pool; 4 tennis courts; and 1 football field. The specific requirements for each park will be determined by the size of the park and the specific location of each park. Landscaped flood control channels will provide an additional 54.5 acres of open space. This acreage is encumbered by an earthquake fault, flood control facilities and does not lend itself for active recreational uses. However, the channels can be used for a trail/bikeway system linking the park sites and providing some recreational opportunities. PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 PAGE NO. 5 However, the improved channels do not meet the intent of the City Park regulations or provide for the minimum improvements recommended by the NRPA and Valley -Wide Recreation. Furthermore, if credit is to be given for these improvements, it should be against the flood control fee as storm water conveyance is the primary function of the channel system. To allow the developer to utilize flood control channels for credit against park space, would constitute double credit and would severely limit the City's ability to provide the minimum recommended recreational facilities to our residents. Schools The Environmental Impact Report contemplates formation of or participation in a Community Facilities District for mitigation of school impacts. Additionally, the City and the School District have since entered into a Cooperation Agreement which requires that all new developments participate in a financing district. The development related to the Specific Plan will be required to participate in a school mitigation financing district. School sites are conceptually indicated on the land use map for the specific plan, in order to determine the details of school construction. Staff prefers to determine the location and type of school at the earliest time possible to ensure that the school is constructed and available when the students being occupying the new homes. Seismicity/Geology The southwest corner of the project site is traversed by the Casa Loma fault, a branch of the San Jacinto fault which is considered the most active fault is southern California. Potential impacts related to the fault zone include severe ground shaking, surface rupture and liquefaction. The mitigation measures identified in the EIR based upon a preliminary geotechnical report require that no structures be permitted in the fault zone area plus a setback of 50 feet and that all structures be constructed in accordance with the earthquake standards of the Uniform Building Code. Additionally, the geotechnical report recommended that reinforced wall footings and post -tension slab foundations be required to protect against liquefaction in those areas most susceptible as determined by subsequent soils reports. Additionally, the geotechnical report recommends that sub -surface geological investigation be provided prior to any grading in the fault zone. Also, it is recommended that a qualified engineering geologist review and approve the final grading plans for the project. The mitigation measures indicated above will included as Conditions of Approval for the project and the implementing subdivisions. PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 PAGE NO. 6 Flood Control and Drainage The majority of the project site is located within an "A" flood zone and would be subject to flood hazard in the event of a 100-year storm. The Phase I portion of the property is not subject to flooding from river overflow. With the provision of conveyance channels, detention basins and debris basins capable of accommodating a 100-year storm, Phase I could be removed from flood zone. Phase II is subject to flooding from river overflow, and would require more extensive mitigation prior to development. Flood control improvements necessary for Phase II could include construction or extension of the levee and/or substantially elevated pads. In this location, according the Flood Insurance Rate Map prepared by FEMA, the flood elevation has not been determined and engineering work will be necessary to determine the base flood elevation. Additional flood control improvements indicated in the Draft EIR are an interim retention basin to be constructed northeast of the Ramona Boulevard, Sanderson Avenue intersection. The interim retention basin may need to be constructed to adequately protect downstream properties from the increased run-off resulting the increase in impervious surfaces, namely streets. It is possible that the interim detention basin may not need to be constructed depending upon the timing of downstream facilities. Also, depending upon the results of detailed hydrology studies the interim basin may became permanent and additional catch or detention basins may be required. Ultimate drainage facilities will be required to be determined prior to any grading on -site. Another issue of concern regards the proximity of the proposed flood control channels relative to the existing aqueduct easements. The existing aqueduct pipelines are rather shallow and may be difficult to cross with flood control channels. Therefore, it will be imperative that the developer work with Metropolitan Water District (MWD) prior to any construction activity in the vicinity of MWD rights -of -way. Eastern Municipal Water District Located to southwest of the site is the existing EMWD waste water treatment facility. Presently, the facility has a 11 million gallons per day capacity. EMWD plans to expand the facility to an ultimate capacity of 25 million gallons per day. The potential odor impact on future residents will be significant. Additionally, EMWD is seeking a 1320 to 2000 foot buffer zone adjacent to the project. As planned, the closest potential development related to the specific plan would be approximately 1200 feet from the outer boundary of the treatment plant. PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 PAGE NO. 7 The proposed buffering from the plant includes a 5.5 acre park site, the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone, Sanderson Avenue and its related scenic setback, and a minimum 100 foot wide grass lined flood control channel. The resultant amount of open -space could be densely planted with trees to minimize potential odors. Also, where the buffer is less than 1320 feet, EMWD recommends that the new and subsequent residents be given notice as to the proximity of the treatment plant. Staff has conditioned the proposal to that effect. Biology The subject site has an extensive and long history of agricultural production, primarily dry - farmed irrigated fields and dairying. As a result, the potential for raptor foraging habitat is high as open agricultural fields provide extensive rodent habitat. Rodents are the primary prey for many raptors which occupy and winter in the area. The project site also includes several ponds and seasonally wet areas. There are at least two ponds in Phase II which have the potential to be considered as jurisdictional wetlands subject to the requirements of the Federal Clean Water Act. The Federal Government has a policy which, in effect, does not allow the elimination of wetlands areas. However, as mitigation for the elimination of the raptor habitat and to ensure there is no net loss of wetlands area, the developer will be required to provide on -site or purchase off - site land to be set aside for biotic resources. There may be potential areas and cooperative agencies for this to occur. It is possible that the developer can purchase credit from the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency, or work with and/or contribute to EMWD for wetlands on the treatment plant site, or purchase land adjacent to or contribute towards an expansion of the San Jacinto Wildlife preserve. Furthermore, the applicant can explore with a qualified biologist as to whether portions of the grass -lined channels and fault zones can be set aside for biotic resources. The consulting biologist for the Draft EIR recommends that 8.8 acres be set aside for protected wetlands and that off -site raptor foraging habitat be enhanced to improve prey productivity by direct management or through elimination of pesticide use. Transportation and Circulation The proposed project has the potential to generate substantial amounts vehicle trips which will necessitate significant improvements to area and project site roadways. Further, the General Plan indicates a minimum level of service (LOS) as "C". The level of service (LOS) is a traffic analysis depictor of traffic flow quality. The LOS of "C" occurs when an intersection functions at between 71 and 80 percent of capacity and when the average stoppage per vehicle is between 15 and 25 seconds. To maintain the City minimum of LOS "C", the project will be conditioned to provide intersection improvements at certain streets in and adjacent to the project. PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 PAGE NO. 8 Based upon the trip generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, the project has the potential to generate approximately 30,000 vehicle trips per day. The intersections which will be most significantly impacted include: 1. Ramona Expressway/Sanderson Avenue 2. Lyon Avenue/Ramona Boulevard 3. Ramona Expressway/Potter Road (re -aligned Lyon Avenue) 4. Sanderson Avenue/Ramona Boulevard (re -aligned) These intersections will be significantly upgraded to maintain LOS "C" or better. The following represent the proposed improvements to intersections off the site to mitigate the impacts related to this project only: 1. Ramona Expressway/Sanderson Avenue Additional through lanes in each direction. Provision of left turn lanes on Ramona Expressway. Provision of right turn lane on west bound Ramona Expressway. 2. Sanderson Avenue/Ramona Boulevard Additional throughlanes on both sides of Sanderson Avenue. Sanderson Avenue/Cottonwood Avenue Additional throughlanes on both sides of Sanderson Avenue. 4. Lyon Avenue/Ramona Expressway Additional throughlanes on each side of Ramona Expressway. Provision of right turn lane on the south side of Ramona Expressway. Provision of left turn lane on Lyon Avenue south of Ramona Expressway. 5. Lyon Avenue/Cottonwood Avenue Additional throughlanes in each direction on Lyon Avenue. Provision of left turn lanes on Lyon Avenue. Additionally, within the site, significant improvements to major roads will be necessary. Street improvements to General Plan standards will be commenced on the following streets as follows: Lyon Avenue, south of Ramona Expressway to De Anza Drive - 100 foot major roadway 2. Potter Road, south of Ramona Expressway to the Sunrise Ranch southern boundary - 88 foot secondary highway PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 PAGE NO. 9 3. Ramona Boulevard, realigned between Sanderson Avenue and Lyon Avenue - 100 foot major roadway 4. De Anza Drive, realigned from Lyon Avenue to the Sunrise Ranch east boundary - 88 foot secondary highway 5. Jeffrey Road, between Sanderson Avenue and Lyon Avenue - 66 foot collector street Staff will also recommend that full improvements to Lyon Avenue (south of De Anza to Jeffrey Road), Sanderson Avenue and Ramona Expressway, adjacent to the site, be required. Normally, such improvements are beyond the scope of the project proponent. However, to minimize disruption and to foster economic development these improvements should be done in conjunction with this project. To offset the developer for costs incurred which are not related to this development, a reimbursement mechanism could be established whereby when other developments go forward the pro-rata contribution to regional roadways would be reimbursed to this developer. In addition, traffic signals will be constructed at the following intersections when warranted: + Ramona Expressway/Potter Road + Ramona Expressway/Lyon Avenue + Sanderson Avenue/Ramona Boulevard + Ramona Boulevard/Potter Road + Ramona Boulevard/Lyon Avenue + Lyon Avenue/De Anza Drive + Lyon Avenue/Jeffrey Road Funding and timing for these improvements are subject to several variables. In the case of on -site roadways the developer will be responsible for the construction of those roadways in their entirety. Off -site roadways would be constructed to ensure that impacts are minimized and adequate levels of service are maintained. A combination of project funding and impact funding could be utilized. DISCUSSION As indicated previously, the Sunrise Ranch project encompasses 1025 acres and is comprised of 2 phases and the EMWD reservoir site. The specific plan process involves multiple steps. The specific plan process implements the requirements of the Planned Community Development (PCD) zone of Ordinance No. 340. The intent of the PCD zone is allow the developer flexibility in design, density and development options to implement the general plan. PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 PAGE NO. 10 The first step in the process involves the processing of a Conceptual Specific Plan (CSP) which is before you now. The CSP describes the potential development scenario of the project over a several year time frame. Included within the CSP are the location and amount of land devoted to each land use type. The CSP also provides detailed information on design and development standards as well as the timing and funding of necessary infrastructure improvements. The second step in the process involves the implementation of the CSP. This is when individual development projects are processed and entitlements for construction are approved. Upon this stage, each comprehensive specific plan is process determining the actual foot print and design detail for individual planning areas. Each of the two remaining steps require public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. Following is a description of each phase: Phase I Phase I encompasses 596 acres, is primarily located south of the realigned Ramona Boulevard and proposes 2080 dwelling units. The majority of the dwellings will be single family detached (1840) on lots ranging in area from 5000 to 7200 square feet. Phase I also proposes approximately 15 acres multi -family housing, which would generate approximately 240 units. The plan proposes 23.5 acres for commercial use, 4 school sites, 26.5 acres of park land and 56 acres of grass -lined flood control channels within Phase I. Phase II Phase II is located north of realigned Ramona Boulevard. Phase II encompasses 209 acres and proposes 908 dwellings based upon the land use designations of the Northwest Plan. Also identified for Phase II are 28.5 acres for industrial uses. Because Phase II is controlled by a group of property owners whose development plans vary, specific plan designations and zoning have not been identified. However, because both phases display similar environmental constraints or attributes, Phase II has been addressed in the Program DEIR based on the underlying Northwest Plan designations. Nevertheless, when entitlement processing is initiated within Phase II, an amendment to the Sunrise Ranch Conceptual Specific Plan will be required to establish the appropriate framework for land use and zoning for the project area. San Jacinto Reservoir The reservoir site encompasses 220 acres and is currently controlled by EMWD. Eastern Municipal Water District periodically stores surplus reclaimed water on the site for agricultural purposes. Additionally, the City is exploring the possibility of developing the site as a municipal golf course and has had on -going discussions with EMWD regarding this PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 PAGE NO. 11 issue. Furthermore, the reservoir was considered for recreational use as the area adjacent to the reservoir is bisected by earthquake faults and drainage courses. As such, the potential exists for a significant regional recreation area which could include a future municipal golf course. However, by addressing the potential use of the reservoir and surrounding area at this time, necessitates only an amendment to the Specific Plan and focused environmental review should the regional recreation area materialize. Land Use Plan The land use plan for the project proposes a total of 2988 dwelling units, 27 acres of commercial on four parcels, two industrial sites totalling 28.5 acres, four school sites encompassing 50 acres, and 34.5 acres of park space. Also included are green belts and landscaped corridors necessary to accommodate flood control channels and earthquake fault zones. The proposed land use plan implements the Land Use Element of General Plan, based upon the recently approved Northwest Plan. The project proposes a hybrid of land use designations which is permitted per the specific plan process. The following is a description of the residential land use designations proposed for Sunrise Ranch: 1. Low Density Residential (LDR-4) - 4 dwellings per acre This designation primarily allows development subject to the existing City R-1 zone. The lots within this designation will be a minimum of 7200 square feet, with a maximum density of 4 dwellings per acre. Proposed within this designation are a total 1366 lots in five planning areas. 2. Low Density Residential (LDR-5) - 5 dwellings per acre This designation was established to provide an opportunity for the developer to create 6000 square foot lots without having to process individual Planned Unit Developments. Proposed within this designation are a total 430 lots in one planning area. The maximum density in this designation is 5 dwellings per acre. 3. Low -Medium Density Residential (LMDR-6) - 6 dwellings per acre This designation was established to provide an opportunity to create 5000 square foot lots to satisfy the needs and market for seniors and or moderate income families. The designation is proposed for two planning areas and will result in a total of 282 units. The maximum density within this designation is 6 dwellings per acre. PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 PAGE NO. 12 4. Medium Density Residential (MDR) - 10 dwellings per acre Phase II This designation allows development similar to the existing MDR General Plan designation, but proposes a maximum density of 10 dwellings per acre which 4 du/acre less than that proposed by the General Plan. A maximum of 580 dwellings in two planning areas will be generated within this designation. Future development within this designation would be determined by an amendment to CSP prior construction of Phase II. 5. High Density Residential (HDR) - 16 dwellings per acre Phase I 25 dwellings per acre Phase II This designation allows development similar to the existing HDR General Plan designation, but proposes a maximum density of 16 dwellings per acre within Phase I and 25 dwellings per acre for Phase IL The density proposed within Phase I is 9 du/acre less than that proposed by the General Plan and for Phase II. A maximum of 360 dwellings in three planning areas for both phases will be generated within this designation. As indicated above, future development of this designation within the Phase II would be subject to an amendment to the CSP. Within each of the residential land use classifications, uses and development standards are prescribed. The standards prescribed are consistent with the regulations of Ordinance No. 340, but are more stringent in certain instances. Furthermore, the CSP establishes the minimum floor areas per dwelling within each of the respective single family classifications. The proposed floor areas range from 1000 square feet in the LMDR-6 classification to 1350 square feet in the LDR-4 classification. Commercial land uses will be similar to that prescribed by the existing Community Commercial general plan designation and the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning classification. The CSP has established the commercial sites in four planning areas encompassing 27 acres in close proximity to both the Ramona Expressway and Sanderson Avenue to provide retail opportunities to residents as well as commuters. The CSP has identified conceptual architectural standards relating to landscaping, lighting, and signage. Also, the CSP has identified standards for setbacks, building height, parking lot design and storage. Industrial land uses will be regulated by the proposed Light Industrial/Business Park classification. The uses permitted vary from research and development to light manufacturing similar to the City M-1 (Light Industrial) zone. The industrial classification encompasses 28.5 acres, in two planning areas and located primarily adjacent to the Ramona Expressway. As in the commercial classification, the CSP prescribes standards on physical site development to architectural detail. PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 PAGE NO. 13 The CSP primarily assigns land use and development standards to Phase I. Phase II development scenarios reflect the existing Northwest Plan designations. To further refine development within Phase II, an amended specific plan will have to processed. To expedite the process, the EIR has considered potential impacts related to development of Phase H. As a result, so long the development plan for Phase II is consistent in density with the Northwest Plan subsequent environmental review may not be necessary. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission: 1. Order the preparation of the Final EIR relative to Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91 and Change of Zone 11-91 2. Adopt Resolution No. 92- recommending the City Council approve Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91 and Change of Zone 11-91, subject to the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval. Brian McNabb Director of Community Development PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 PAGE NO. 14 FINDINGS OF FACT CONCEPTUAL SPECIFIC PLAN 1-91 CHANGE OF ZONE 11-91 The conceptual Specific Plan will result in an increase in density for the project area from agricultural uses to 3.7 dwellings per gross acre. 2. A mapped seismic special studies zone dissects the subject site. Mitigation measures would be that no structures be permitted in the fault zone area plus a setback of 50 feet. To accommodate the fault zone, the proponent provides 5.5 acres open space areas diagonally across the development and adjacent to Sanderson Avenue. Furthermore, all structures will be required to be constructed in accordance with the earthquake standards of the Uniform Building Code. Additionally, it will be recommended that foundation reinforcement be considered to minimize the potential for liquefaction in those areas that are susceptible. The mitigation measures indicated above will included as Conditions of Approval for the CSP. 3 The conceptual Specific Plan will generate a need for a fire station in or near the subject site. A condition has been added which will require that a fire station be constructed and equipped prior to any occupancy of dwellings related to the CSP. Additionally, as mitigation for the project, the developer would be subject to the fire mitigation fee and be required to join the public safety community facilities district. 4. There will have to extensive upgrades to existing sewer and water facilities to serve the site. The CSP has prepared a master sewer and water plan in conjunction with the Northwest Plan. Proper facilities will have to constructed and extensions made to service individual development proposals. 5. A biological report was conducted and discussed in the Draft EIR which concluded that the area is foraging habitat for raptors and that jurisdictional wetlands exist. Mitigation of these impacts will be required including the provision or participation in the establishment of new wetlands and foraging areas. 6. The project will impact the ability for the school district to provide adequate educational facilities. The City and the School District entered into a Cooperation Agreement which requires that all new developments participate in a financing district. The CSP identified conceptual school sites to ensure school impacts are considered and mitigated early in the development process. 7. The project will generate a need for improved flood control facilities. Flood control impacts will be mitigated by the potential provision of an interim retention basin, debris basins and grass lined channels throughout the development. The grass lined channels will primarily convey flood waters but will also be used to provide bikeways and trails across the development. PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 PAGE NO. 15 8. The CSP will generate an impact upon the park and recreation facilities of the City. The necessary mitigation related to the development is 40 acres of active recreation area. Improvements to the park space will include landscaping, ballfields, hard courts and play lots 9. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared pursuant to State law and is intended to serve as an informational document by providing full disclosure of the potential impacts related to the project. 10. All significant effects on the environment due to the issues listed below will be lessened to the extent feasible at the appropriate time. a. Alteration of drainage patterns and downstream water quality. b. Incremental decrease of biological resources. c. Alteration of existing land use patterns. d. Incremental decrease of natural resources. 11. The significant effects on the environment related to air quality, soils and agriculture, and traffic and circulation are found to be unavoidable are considered as acceptable due to the potential benefits related to the project. 12. The project will not create any conditions that will be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 13. The project is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan and implements the requirements of the Planned Community Development zone of Ordinance No. 340. 14. The project is consistent with the City and the 2010 Committee Mission Statements by providing a well planned and balanced community, offering additional educational, recreational, employment and cultural opportunities. PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1992 PAGE NO. 16 Ttm P ! Radaker Corporation Phase II Phase I EM W D Water Reclamation Plant SUNRISE RANCH Jeffrey Avenu Base ap Change of Zone EXHIBIT ' The P Redeker Corporation PHASE II PHASE I 10.11%t 41111T1ON L I :VI SUNRISE RANCH NORTHWEST AREA PLAN SOUNDRri NNW allir ,i1.4.1.1111111 r. l; 41 ilii ia 1.01111.111111 B rl ZIP'i I rio "...M te.;;.5 • Legend SMSOL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES INDUSTRIAL PARKS xisting Land Use Northwest Area Plan hange of Zone EXHIBIT aaotaseati The Peacock I Radaker Corporation SUNRISE RANCH EMWD Water Reclamation Plant C-2 San Jacinto Reservoir MWD PA-1 R-1 xisting Zoning hange of Zone Legend A - AGRICULTURE A-2-10 - HEAVY AGRICULTURE 10AC. MIN. R-1 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL C-2 - GENERAL COMMERCIAL M-1 - LIGHT MANUFACTURING 1400 700 0 1400 FLI1 EXHIBIT SUNRISE RANCH The Peacock / Radakar Corporation Surrounding Land Use Change of Zone EXHIBIT " ,:eashrsat .4 C4' d. The Peacock / Redeker Corporation SUNRISE RANCH Legend DISSIMADED Ni SPECIFIC PLAN ROM' sonmseasem DE MATERIAL t444AN9 11109MAY 1.9.99.99 99,9,99`. 900 MAJOR MANWAY SE SECONDARY i804134Y 04STOMATED *ECONOMY 191099WAY St COLLECTOR SITREET SIRE PATH Existing Circulation System Change of Zone NB WRY EXHIBIT Peacock / Radaker Colion SUNRISE RANCH 1111166„ • .•41117,1Will1.111/4111111019r w11111, Phase II Phase I EMWD Water Reclamation Plant L \y Jeffrey Avenue Legend Pro!ect Boundary MENEM Expressway (142' R.O.W. with sonic setback) MMOMM Urban Arterial Highway (134' R.O.W. with senIc setback) 00000 Major Highway 1100' R.O.W.) 00000 Secondary Highway (36° R.O.W.) 10" 4,62 Collector Street (66' R.O.W.) Pedestrian Trail Note: See Figure No. For Street Sections See Figure No, For Trail Detail 1400 700 0 1400 Proposed Circulation System Change of Zone EXHIBIT „ • , Ed] The Peaoocic I Redeker Corporation SUNRISE RANCH Phase II Phaao I EM W D Water Reclamation Plant Avenue Legend 11111 SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATED RY 100•YEAR FLOOD ZONE A N. haw IIn.d dnal.ns determi.d. ZONE AE ZONE AH ZONE AO ZONE Aft ZONE V ZONE VE Base flood ehvatlent deter mined. flood depths of I le l feet (*toady eras of p.Mlop); haw flood elevations determhsud. Fined depths et I to I Teti (mushy duet floft on d•pme ...sin,: aeeraao depth. detema{rsed. F.r moat of athrvlai fan flood. {na. nlochlet also determined. To be protected N.m 100,year flood by Federal (load pr.nc(l.n system under co llrurtl.n; no base eMnelen. determined. Cuttet heed .hh felony guard !.are steles): Ito hose flood elevation. Mten mined. Ceoclol flood with valechy honed (wan talent: base flood elevations determined. OTHER AREAS ZONE X Atcas dewrnuned to be outside 500. year flood plain, ZONE D Areas in which flood hounds are undetermined. 1400 700 0 1400 I—LJ1 I Flood Zone Change of Zone EXHIBIT " TM 1 SUNRISE RANCH .:....ter,.. Geology and Seismicity Change of Zone EXHIBIT • Pro No sae General Plan Change of Zone SAN JACXIO I MCAT ON ER0IACr Nes am NO NO .0210 PHASEI AD A ss® • uao ilNeA Zia Zee MT aI ENSANa WATT NTE411100 FANO PHASE II Net aw N... 0211 >a".. SCN NON R.ivn. neu6008 NINNINNIGNS CONCEPTUAL SPECIFIC PLAN SUNRISE RA CH 5 A N LAND USE MAP N T 0 LEGEND LAND USE DESIGNATION LOW DENST V RESIDENTIAL • 4 itno.al LOW DENS/ Y RESIDENTIAL - 5 Inn. c i LOW MEDIUM DENST' RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DE` SITV RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL CCYERC:AL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL / BUSINESS PARK PUBLIC FAC.:ITY SCHOOL S'- PARK SITE LINEAR PA=4 GRASS LINED CHANNEL LINEAR PAP[ M.W.D. / E.M. W.D. PHASE LINE PROJECT BOUNDARY LINE PLANNING AREA NUMBER PLAN/No AREA LETTER '� —_-- GENERAL P..AN LAND USE r Set AWKT AWWp1 W EXHIBIT ' NORTH GCAI F 1`4 400 ®A P101013101 0 4W INN MO .00 meI cr �al ENG;NEEP0 30_ANN£AS iO GMNINN The Peacock / Redeker Corporation SUNRISE RANCH 1111 1111111111111111I1I111R11R111 Proposed Zoning Change of Zone EXHIBIT ' RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RELATED TO CONCEPTUAL SPECIFIC PLAN 1-91 (SUNRISE RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN) AND CHANGE OF ZONE 11-91 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS; WHEREAS, Section 15090 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines provides the process for Certification of Final Environmental Impact Reports. WHEREAS, the Notice of Completion commencing the 45 day public review period for the Draft Environmental Impact Report was filed with the State Clearinghouse on July 14, 1992. WHEREAS, a public notice indicating the 45 day review period for the Draft Environmental Impact Report had commenced was published on July 14, 1992 in a general circulation newspaper and sent to all known interested individuals and organizations. WHEREAS, on September 1, 1992, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto reviewed and commented on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91 and Change of Zone 11-91. WHEREAS, on September 16, 1992, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report, Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91 and Change of Zone 11-91 and accepted testimony on the project and ordered the preparation of the Final Environmental Impact Report. WHEREAS, on October 14, 1992, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91 and Change of Zone 11-91 recommending to the City Council approval of said items and determined that the Final Environmental Impact Report adequately evaluates environmental impacts related to the future development of the project, provides adequate mitigation to the extent feasible and that those impacts which cannot be feasibly mitigated are outweighed by the project generated benefits to the community and further recommended that the City Council certify the Final Environmental Impact Report. WHEREAS, all individuals, agencies and organizations which comm n e on the Dft Environmental Impact Report were provided written notecation as to the in en o the ify Council 10 days prior to the date of Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report. WHEREAS, on October 20, 1992, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto held a public hearing on the Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91 and Change of Zone 11-91 and determined that implementing Specific Plan Land Use Designations and Zoning Classifications should be adopted relative to area considered in the Final Environmental Impact Report. WHEREAS, the Final Environmental Impact Report has identified measures to eliminate or substantially lessen all significant effects on the environment where feasible relative to the Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91 and Change of Zone 11-91. WHEREAS, the Final Environmental Impact Report has identified that although the Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91 and Change of Zone 11-91 may significantly impact the environment, a Statement of Overriding Considerations and Findings of Fact have been incorporated into the Final Environmental Impact Report which determined that any significant effects on the environment are unavoidable and are acceptable to the City of the San Jacinto. documents: WHEREAS, the Final Environmental Impact Report consists of the following A. The Draft Environmental Impact Report, identified as Exhibit A. B. The City responses to comments relative to the Draft Environmental Impact Report, identified as Exhibit B. C. The Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations relative to significant effects which cannot be mitigated, identified as Exhibit C. D. Minutes of the October 20, 1992, City Council Meeting, identified as Exhibit D. WHEREAS, the Final Environmental Impact Report has been completed in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., the California Environmental Quality Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Jacinto does hereby Certify the Final Environmental Impact Report related to Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91 and Change of Zone 11-91. AI 1EST: MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED the 20th day of October, 1992. Deputy City Clerk Mayor CERTIFICATE The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. duly passed by the said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein. Deputy City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO APPROVING CONCEPTUAL SPECIFIC PLAN 1-91, KNOWN AS THE SUNRISE RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN, SUBJECT TO CERTIFICATION OF THE RELATED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Government Code the Planning Commission held public hearings on September 16, 1992 and October 14, 1992, finally recommending the City Council adopt Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91. WHEREAS, on October 20, 1992 the City Council held a public hearing concerning Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91. WHEREAS, testimony was received from the public related to the Conceptual Specific Plan proposal. WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Resolution certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report related to the Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91. WHEREAS, the Final Environmental Impact Report has identified measures to eliminate or substantially lessen all significant effects on the environment where feasible relative to the Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91. WHEREAS, the Final Environmental Impact Report has identified that although the Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91 may significantly impact the environment, a Statement of Overriding Considerations and Findings of Fact have been incorporated into the Final Environmental Impact Report which determined that any significant effects on the environment are unavoidable and are acceptable to the City of the San Jacinto. WHEREAS, the Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91 Final Environmental Impact Report provides a sufficient degree of analysis to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City Environmental Guidelines. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the Conceptual Specific Plan (CSP) 1-91 will result in an increase in density for the project area from agricultural uses to 3.7 dwellings per gross acre. 2. That a mapped seismic special studies zone dissects the subject site. To accommodate the fault zone, the proponent provides 5.5 acres open space areas diagonally across the development and adjacent to Sanderson Avenue. All structures will be required to be constructed in accordance with the earthquake standards of the Uniform Building Code. Foundation reinforcement be considered to minimize the potential for liquefaction in those areas that are susceptible. The measures indicated above have been included as Conditions of Approval for the CSP. 3 The Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91 will generate a need for a fire station in or near the subject site. A condition has been added to require adequate fire protection prior to any occupancy of dwellings related to the CSP. The development is subject to the fire mitigation fee and is required to join or form a public safety community facilities district. 4. There will have to extensive upgrades to existing sewer and water facilities to serve the site. The CSP has proposed a master sewer and water plan in conjunction with the Northwest Plan. Proper facilities will have to constructed and extensions made to service individual development proposals. 5. A biological report was conducted and discussed in the Final EIR which concluded that the area is foraging habitat for raptors and that jurisdictional wetlands exist. Mitigation of these impacts will be required including the provision or participation in the establishment of new wetlands and foraging areas. 6. The project will impact the ability for the school district to provide adequate educational facilities. The City and the School District entered into a Cooperation Agreement which requires that all new developments participate in a financing district. The CSP identified conceptual school sites to ensure school impacts are considered and mitigated early in the development process. 7. The project will generate a need for improved flood control facilities. Flood control impacts will he mitigated by the potential provision of an interim retention basin, debris basins and grass lined channels throughout the development. The grass lined channels will primarily convey flood waters but will also be used to provide bikeways and trails across the development. 8. The CSP will generate an impact upon the park, recreation and library facilities of the City. The necessary mitigation related to the development is 40 acres of active recreation area. Improvements to the park space will include landscaping, ballfields, hard courts and play lots subject to the requirements of the National Recreation and Park Association Standards. The applicant will also have to work with the County Free Library System to maintain the necessary level of service for library facilities. 9. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared pursuant to State law and is intended to serve as an informational document by providing full disclosure of the potential impacts related to the project. 10. All significant effects on the environment due to the following issues will be lessened to the extent feasible at the appropriate time. a. Alteration of drainage patterns and downstream water quality. b. Incremental decrease of biological resources. c. Alteration of existing land use patterns. d. Incremental decrease of natural resources. 11. The significant effects on the environment related to air quality, soils and agriculture, and traffic and circulation which are found to be unavoidable are considered as acceptable due to the potential benefits related to the project. 12. The project will not create any conditions that will be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 13. The project is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan and implements the requirements of the Planned Community Development zone of Ordinance No. 340. 14. The project is consistent with the City and the 2010 Committee Mission Statements by providing a well planned and balanced community, offering additional educational, recreational, employment and cultural opportunities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council finds that Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91 duly implements the San Jacinto General Plan as follows: Hazards Management Element - the project identifies seismic hazards and flood hazards and mitigates them in various manners that meet standard engineering practices. 2. Natural Resources Management Element - The project recognizes impact on air quality due to increased traffic and will participate in any and all City Air Quality Implementation Programs. Native plant and animal species will he impacted but planting of native plant species and preservation of large stands of trees where feasible will be undertaken to preserve vegetation and habitat. 3. Aesthetics, Cultural, and Recreational Resources Element - The project is required to provide a minimum of 40 acres of park space. An additional 56 acres open space in the development will be is available to future and existing residents as well. 4. Housing - Specific Plan 1-91 will provide 2988 residential units with a variety of product types. 5. Circulation Element - The project will provide dedication and improvement of adjacent streets to their ultimate cross-section and provide improvements and upgrades at the Ramona Expressway/Sanderson Avenue intersection to eliminate any hazardous situations. The project will also participate in a bridge and thoroughfare district to minimize impacts on and provide improvements to the regional and local roadway infrastructure. 6. Land Use Element - Specific Plan 1-91 meets the criteria for Specific Plans as outlined in the General Plan. The development implements the land use designations of the General Plan as established by the Northwest Area Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council has reviewed and considered the Final Environmental Impact Report in evaluating Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91 and the Final Environmental Impact Report is an adequate and objective statement that complies with the California Environmental Quality Act and the City Environmental Guidelines. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that Conceptual Specific Plan 1-91, on file with the office of the City Clerk, including the final conditions of approval and exhibits, is hereby adopted as the Specific Plan of Land Use for the real property shown on the plan unless the plan is repealed or amended. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED the day of , 1990. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor A I I EST: Deputy City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 11-91 AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby amended by adding thereto Change of Zone 11-91 as herein set forth. Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the City of San Jacinto shown on the attached map marked Exhibit "A" made a part hereof, is hereby established. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. Section 4. A Final Environmental Impact Report has been prepared and recommeded for Certification by the Planning Commission on October 14, 1992, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act for Change of Zone 11-91. Section 5. Said Final Environmental Impact Report has identified measures to mitigate potential impacts on the environment related to this zone change. Section 6. Said Final Environmental Impact Report has identified that although there may be a significant impact on the environment by right of the change related to Change of Zone 11-91, a Statement of Overriding Considerations and Findings of Fact have been incorporated into the Final Environmental Impact Report. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 20th day of October 1992. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 1992 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATIEST Mayor Deputy City Clerk CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of 1992. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of 1992. City Clerk -2- Phase II Phase ia Iw . V . 118114X3 cn cn rn TO: FROM: DATE: STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Les Evans, Interim Director of Public Works October, 20, 1992 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. RECOMMENDING A WATER RATE ADJUSTMENT Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. Adjusting Water Rates. Fiscal Analysis: The proposed increase will generate approximately $170,000. Background: At their meeting on October 6, 1992, the City Council held a Public Hearing on the staff recommendation for water rate adjustments and gave the following direction: 1. Eliminate the $1.05 water usage rate for water use in excess of 20,000 cubic feet per month. 2. Adjust the water rate structure for 3", 4", 6" and 8" meters to insure that these users will not experience increases in monthly water charges over 30%. Based on the Council's direction, a new Resolution has been prepared reflecting the following water rate structure adjustments: Meter Size 5/8" 3/4" 1" 1-1/2" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" Monthly Service Charge New Service Charge 6.50 6.50 10.25 20.00 30.00 32.00 55.00 100.00 145.00 Present Service Charge 6.00 6.00 8.00 12.00 17.00 25.00 45.00 78.00 113.00 October 20, 1992 Page Two Water Rate Adjustment Monthly Water Usage Fee For 5/8" and 3/4" meters: 0.500 cubic feet - included in monthly service charge 501-2000 cubic feet - 66.5 cents per 100 cubic feet over 2000 cubic feet - .85 cents per 100 cubic feet For 1", 1-1/2" and 2" meters: 0-2000 cubic feet - 66.5 cents per 100 cubic feet over 2000 cubic feet - .85 cents per 100 cubic feet For 2" meters and larger: all water - .70 cents per 100 cubic feet The effects of the proposed new monthly service charge and water usage fees are shown in the following table: Present Proposed Meter # of Meters Average Monthly Monthly Size in System Use (cf) Charge Charge 5/8" 700 1831 13.59 15.36 3/4" 2232 2067 14.93 16.92 1" 252 3733 25.86 38.27 1-1/2" 27 7674 50.04 81.53 2" 79 14,325 87.25 148.05 3" 4 55,079 324.70 417.55 4" 9 44,811 283.32 371.68 6" 1 200 78.00 101.40 8" 2 71 113.00 145.50 The proposed rate structure will generate about $170,000 of new revenue. If approved, it will become effective in November and be reflected in December water bills. a:les/waterates RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SA0 JACI2VTO^ CALIFORNIA ADJUSTING WATER RATES WHEREAS/ the schedule of water rates currently established for subscribers of water through the water system of the City of Sao Jacinto is contained in Resolution No. 1765 and Resolution No. 1766, but is not adequate to defray the costs of ownership, maintenance and improvement of said system; and WHEREAS, the City of Sao Jacinto has caused to be prepared a Master Plan of the city/o water service area, which identifies capital facilities deficiencies of approximately $6.0 million dollars and recommends that op to 40$ of water revenues be dedicated to the cost of construction of capital improvements; and WHEREAS, the present water rate structure provides only for the operation and zuuioteoaooe of the water department and does not provide any funds for a capital improvement program; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Sao Jacinto has given study to the proposed rate structure; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Sao Jacinto has held a Public Hearing thereon as required by law, and selected u new rate structure, which will include foods for a phased capital improvement program/ NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Sao Jacinto does resolve as follows: Section I, That Resolution No. 1765 and Resolution No. 1766 are hereby repealed. Section 2. The City of Sao Jacinto shall charge and collect from each subscriber to water service amounts according to the following rates: ` RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 A. SERVICE CHARGE. A monthly service charge according to the size of the subscriber's meter, as follows: Meter Size Monthly Service Charge 5/8" 6.50 3/4" 6.50 1" $ 10.25 1.5" $ 20.00 2" $ 30.00 3" $ 32.00 4" $ 55.00 6" $ 100.00 8" $ 145.00 B. USAGE CHARGE - For all water consumed, there shall be additional charges on the following basis: For meters 2" and smaller: For the first 2000 cubic feet of water used during the monthly billing period, the charge shall bee $0.665 per 100 cubic feet. For all water used beyond the first 2000 cubic feet per monthly billing period, the charge shall be $0.85 per 100 cubic feet. For meters larger than 2": For all water used, the charge shall be $0.70 per 100 cubic feet. C. LIFELINE RATE. For subscribers with 5/8" and 3/4" meters there shall be no usage charge for the first 500 cubic feet of water used during the monthly billing period. D. TEMPORARY METERS. A rental fee of $30.00 per month plus a charge of $2.00 per day shall be imposed for each temporary meter in addition to a usage charge of $1.05 per 100 cubic feet of water used. Section 3. The rates established in this resolution shall be effective upon the monthly billing period which commences in November, 1992. RESOLUTION NO. Page 3 Section 4. The Council does specifically find that this rate adjustment is necessary to obtain funds for capital projects, necessary to maintain service within existing service areas and is, therefore, categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15273 (a) (4) California Code of Regulations and California Public Resources Code Section 21080 (b) (8). PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1992 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I Maurice Armster, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. is a full, true and correct copy of that now on file in this office. STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Les Evans, Interim Director of Public Works DATE: October 20, 1992 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. RECOMMENDING A SEWER ADJUSTMENT RATE Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. recommending a Sewer Rate Adjustment. Fiscal Analysis: The proposed increase will generate approximately $100,000. Background: On October 6, 1992, the City Council held a Public Hearing on the proposed new sewer rate structure. At the close of the Public Hearing, the only question remaining unanswered was how septic tank users would be affected. The applicable City Code Section states: 13.44.040 Rental fees --Establishment - The City Council is authorized to establish sewer rental fees to be charged to the owner or person in charge of any premises within the City having available to such premises the sewer system of the City. Such charges may be established by resolution of the City Council and may be amended from time to time by resolution of the City Council. (Prior Code S16-90) A further code section defines "availability" as within 200 feet. Based on these code sections, the City has a policy of imposing the sewer rental fee on all "premises" within 200 feet of a sewer line. There is no record of how many septic tank customers are being charged a sewer rental fee. Staff does not recommend a policy change. a:les/sewercharge RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA ADJUSTING SEWER RATES WHEREAS, the schedule of sewer rental fees currently established for dischargers of sewage through the sewage collection system of the City of San Jacinto is contained in Resolution No. 1767, but is not adequate to defray the costs of operating and maintaining said system; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto has given study to the proposed rental fee structure; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto has held a Public Hearing thereon as required by law, and selected a new rental fee structure. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto does resolve as follows: Section 1. That Resolution No. 1767 is hereby repealed. Section 2. The City of San Jacinto shall charge and collect from each discharger to the sewage collection system amounts according to the following rates: SERVICE CHARGE. follows: A monthly sewer rental charge as Single family residence Multiple family residential units Commercial/Industrial accounts $3.50 per month $3.00 per month per unit $3.50 per month per 1100 cubic feet of water usage* $3.00 per month per unit Each hotel, motel or boarding house shall be charged a monthly fee according to the number of units existent in said hotel, motel or boarding house. *Credit shall be given for water used for irrigation purposes RESOLUTION NO. PAGE 2 Section 3. The rates established in this resolution shall be effective upon the monthly billing period which commences in November, 1992. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1992 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I Maurice Armster, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. is a full, true and correct copy of that now on file in this office. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF SAN JACINTO STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager October 20, 1992 VILLAGE 4 - SOBOBA SPECIFIC PLAN NEIGHBORHOOD - Soboba RECOMMENDATION Give Staff direction on the following questions: 1. Should the fire truck loan repayment be deferred a year so landscaping can be installed from CFD tax proceeds? 2. Should the bonds be called so paving can be completed? BACKGROUND The Staff has met on three separate occasions with several residents of Soboba Village 4. The purposes of their meetings have been the resolution of issues of concern to them. These issues are as follows: Can the parkway on Soboba Road in front of the development be landscaped 2. Lack of a street light on Soboba Road at Chabela 3. Lack of the final course of pavement within the development 4. The sandbags at the entrance to the project 5. Weed abatement City Council Staff Report October 20, 1992 Page 2 6. Lighting Landscape Maintenance District questions 7. Street patching at Lake Park Drive and Soboba Road We are actively pursuing resolution to most of the issues but Staff feels the Council should be aware of and endorse two courses of action. The majority of the landscaping in front can be accomplished from the anticipated 92-93 revenue from CFD #1 ($50,000 - $55,000). The engineer's estimate for this work is $60,000 to $65,000. This does mean, however, the repayment of the loan to purchase the fire truck required of the Soboba Development would be deferred a year. We have estimated we can award the bid for this landscaping within 4 months, if the Council endorses this action. 2. Harry Bigham, when he bought the tract from D&S Company, committed to the Council that he would put the final course of asphalt from the entrance easterly and southerly, in front of the models and where the homes have been largely constructed. He thought he'd complete the work within six months when he began his second phase. Unfortunately, nearly a year is past and sales have been very slow so Harry has not advanced to Phase 2. The residents, although sympathetic to Harry's problems, feel the paving should take place. In order for the City to have the streets paved, we must call in the bonds. Although, the process was started a year ago or more, when D&S Company still owned the property, Jim Cox feels we must start from scratch, due to the intervening length of time and the new owner (Bigham). Staff did not follow up on the original letter to the bonding company because of Harry Bigham's credible construction schedule. Even if we put a demand to the bonding company, there is no certainty the paving would take place within a year because of legal maneuvers, which the bonding company can perform. The residents desire the City to call the bonds. Harry Bigham, whom we have also met with, still indicates his desire to complete the paving without the bonds being called and requests patience due to the economy. City Council Staff Report October 20, 1992 Page 3 Staff requests Council direction as to whether the bonds be called. BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM:Ir CCRPT-92\92-10-20.MTG\SobbaVil.4 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: October 20, 1992 SUBJECT: "Staying Home for the Holidays!" (Shop the Valley) Recommendation: That the City of San Jacinto participate in the "Staying Home for the Holidays!" marketing program, and contribute $250 to the budget from Redevelopment Funds. Background: Recently, the City of Hemet and the Hemet Chamber of Commerce have sponsored a "shop at home" campaign, along with many local businesses. These campaigns generally urged shoppers to shop in the City of Hemet. This year, the City of San Jacinto and the San Jacinto Chamber of Commerce asked that there be a change in emphasis to reflect a valley wide approach, including merchants' participation from throughout the valley. Therefore, this year's advertising will feature both the Cities of Hemet and San Jacinto in all "shop at home" type advertising. The Mayors and the City Managers, and representatives from both Chambers of Commerce participated in a press conference to "kick-off" the promotion on Friday, October 16, 1992. A budget has been prepared for the upcoming holiday promotional season. The total budget is $4,600 and is detailed in the attachment to this staff report. It is largely made up of participation fees charged to local business, with a $500 contribution each from the Hemet Chamber of Commerce and City of Hemet. The amount requested of the San Jacinto Chamber and City of San Jacinto is $250. Analysis The amount of $250 represents approximately 5% of the total promotional budget, and represents a legitimate economic development objective. This modest investment will be more than repaid in increased sales from local businesses during this holiday season. It also represents a significant first step for a valley wide focus on economic development rather than city to city competition. staying ==EIYEET� HOME SAN JACINTO for the Holidays! CRITICAL DATES FRIDAY, OCTOBER 16 KICK-OFF PRESS CONFERENCE CHAMBER BOARD ROOM 1:30p.m. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 22 MERCHANT KICK-OFF MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00a.m. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 29 PUBLIC KICK-OFF OF PROGRAM RADIO, TV, NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING PLUS EDITORIAL SUPPORT ALL MEDIA a joint effort of the cities & chambers of commerce o Hemet & San Jacinto An Important pportunity for ALL V LEY US &. SSES! A COORDINATED VALLEY -WIDE CAMPAIGN TO RETAIN BUSINESS USING THE COOPERATIVE EFFORTS OF THE CITIES AND CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE OF HEMET & SAN JACINTO... PLUS THE MANY ESTABLISHED BUSINESSES THROUGHOUT THE VALLEY WHO ASK ONLY FOR A CHANCE TO PROVE THEY CA SERVE THEIR CUSTO ERS WITH EQUAL OR BETTER QUALITY, SELECTION, VALUE & SERVICE NOW BEING ADVERTISED OUTSIDE OUR AREA! on'tMiss the Valley- ide EXCITED ABOUT YOUR CHANCE TO WORK WITH YOUR FELLOW MERCHANTS THROUGHOUT THE VALLEY TO KEEP YOUR RIGHTFUL BUSINESS AT HOME! EXCITED ABOUT HAVING A CHANCE TO PROVE TO YOUR POTENTIAL VALLEY CUSTOMERS THAT YOU CAN TREAT THEM AS WELL OR BETTER THAN ANYONE 1 /2 TANK OF GAS AWAY! EXCITED TO BE A PART OF THE BIGGEST MEDIA BLITZ ON ONE SUBJECT THIS VALLEY HAS EVER SEEN! EXCITED TO BE ABLE TO HELP YOUR LOCAL SCHOOLS WHILE SAVING YOUR OWN BUSINESS! EXCITED TO BE A PART OF A VALLEY -WIDE MERCHANT DIRECTORY & REFERRAL PLAN! a joint effort of the cities and chambers of commerce of Hemet & San Jacinto THE EXCITEMENT STARTS AT 7: 00a. m. 450 E. LA THAM AVE. HEMET a joint effort of the cities and chambers of commerce of Hemet & San Jacinto WORKING BUDGET Buttons, balloons, ribbons, T shirts $1,500 Decals and/or window signs 200 Merchant Di rectories 800 Flyers for School Incentives 400 Major School Incentive Prizes 1,500* Miscellaneous Printing/Materials 200 total $4,600 Based on the participation of merchants valley -wide plus the full support of both cities and chambers of commerce. *The School Incentive program is now envisioned for both districts, all schools. The concept is simple: a registry will be kept at all participating merchants and/or shopping centers. Shoppers will register their purchases to the school of their choice and merchants will stamp their receipts so they can't be used again. At the end of the season prizes will be awarded the schools with the most purchases by the individuals stores and /or shopping center plus a grand prize for the school with the most purchases in the valley amongst all participating merchants. Winners will be determined by dividing the total Dollars registered by the official number of enrolled students in that school. The largest number wins! STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Laurie Mora, Deputy City Clerk DATE: October 20, 1992 SUBJECT: Appointment of Planning Commissioners RECOMMENDATION: In order to appoint the Planning Commissioners, each City Council member should vote for two (2) Commissioners, one to fill a short term of two (2) years which will expire on October 31, 1994, and the other to fill a long term of four (4) years, which will expire on October 31, 1996. BACKGROUND In September we advertised in the Hemet News and the Press Enterprise notifying the public of the vacancies on the Planning Commission. We received applications through September 30, 1992. Five (5) applications were accepted, and those applicants were invited to be interviewed by the City Council on October 13, 1992. Due to a conflict Les Redding withdrew his application.