HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 10/17/1989AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
THE COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
DA IL: October 17, 1989
TINE:
7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Rose, Divine, Redding, Boykin, Ford
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
"1988 Pedestrian Safety Citation" Presentation
NOTICE TO PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine
and will be enacted by one motion by the City Council in the form
listed.
There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion
unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests
specified items to be removed and/or discussed.
Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come forward,
upon invitation of the Mayor, state their name, address, and the Consent Calendar item number.
CONSENT CALENDAR - City Manager
A. Approval of Minutes
October 1989, as submitted.
(Receive and File).
B. Approval of Warrants No.'s 20444 through 20549 as
submitted by the Finance Director.
C. Treasurer's Office Time Deposit Register for September
1989. (Receive and File).
D. Claim of Andrew Cortez for personal injuries. (Staff
recommends denial).
E. Ordinance for Adoption - Ordinance No. 877
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California, amending Ordinance 340, the Zoning
Ordinance, relating to fencing and renumbering several
Articles of said Ordinance.
F. Award of Bid No. 89-10 for Street Striping to Arrow
Straight Striping in the amount of $27,604.00, (Staff
recommends approval).
G. Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 882
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
concerning Fire Lanes and providing Penalties for the
Administration thereof.
H. Tahquitz & Wateka Improvement Project 89-89-3 Notice
of Completion. (Staff recommends acceptance and its
recordation).
I. Authorization for Mayor and
Deputy City Clerk to
execute
Improvement Agreement with Donald and Susan
Ziegler. (Staff recommends approval).
J. Clerk Typist request for a Leave of Absence without
pay. (Staff recommends denial).
K. Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No RDA-89-7
A Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
San Jacinto approving 1ract 85081
October 17, 1989 Agenda
Page 2
CONSENT CALENDAR (continued)
L. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda purs
u
a
n
t
t
o
City Attorney.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by:__ Seconded by: Action: to approve
consent calendar items A through L as recommended by
S
t
a
f
f
,
adopt Ordinance No. 877, Resolution No. RDA-89
-
7
a
n
d
introduce Ordinance No. 882 to second reading and wa
i
v
e
t
h
e
reading in full. Vote:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Change of Zone 13-89 and Planned Unit Development 4-89
(continued from October 3, 1989)
Applicant: Kenneth Cokeley
Location: Northeast side of Idyllwild Dive, 200 ft.
northwest of Tiger Lane
A proposal to change the zone on approximately 9.5
a
c
.
from to R-2 Planned Unit Development Overlay
o
n
Tract 24713.
Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 876
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of S
a
n
Jacinto, California, approving Change of Zone 13-89 a
n
d
Planned Unit Development 4-89 amending Zoning Map
o
f
the City of San Jacinto.
Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 89-RDA-4
An Ordinance of the Redevelopment Agency of the Ci
t
y
of San Jacinto, California, approving Change of Zo
n
e
13-89 and Planned Unit Development 4-89 amending Zonin
g
Map of the City of San Jacinto.
Motion by: Seconded by:Action: to introduce to
second reading Ordinance No. 876 and 89-RDA-4 and wai
v
e
t
h
e
reading in full and grant negative declaration .
Vote:
B. Tentative Tract 24713 and Variance 4-99
(continued from October 3, 1989)
Applicant: Kenneth Cokeley
Location: Northeast side of Idyllwild Drive, 200 ft.
northwest of Tiger Lane.
A request to establish an 82 lot subdivision on the
property described above in Change of Zone 13-89.
Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. RDA-89-6
A Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the Ci
t
y
of San Jacinto, California, approving lentative Tra
c
t
24713 and Variance 4-89.
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to adopt and
waive the reading in full of Resolution No. RDA-89-6.
Vote:
C. Change of Zone
Applicant: Max Cross and the City
Location: North of First Street, east of Mistletoe
south of Artesia Street and west of the
east boundary of Tentative Tract 24745.
A proposal to change the zone on approximately 20
acres from A to R-1, Single Family Zone located wit
h
i
n
lentative Tract 24745 and other property to the west
.
October 17, 1989 Agenda
Page 3
Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 679
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California approving Change of Zone 12-89
amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto
Motion by:Seconded by:Action: to introduce
Ordinance No. 879 to second reading and waive the reading
in full and grant negative declaration.
Vote:
D. Change ?grip_ 4 89
Applicant: J.T. Francis and City
Location: Northeast corner of Midway and Santa Fe
A proposal to change 10 gross acres, including two
adjacent properties by City request.
Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 880
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California approving Change of Zone 14-89
amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to introduce
Ordinance No. 880 to second reading and waive the reading
in full and grant negative declaration.
Vote:
E. Change of Zone 16-89
Applicant: Brea Trading
Location: South of Second Street, east of Vernon
Avenue, north of Main Street, west of Camino Los
Banos.
A proposal to change approximately 2.72 acres, from S-D,
Senior Development to H-1, Single Family Residential.
Ordinance for Introduction - Ordinance No. 881
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California approving Change of Zone 16-89
amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto
Motion by:Seconded by: Action: to introduce
Ordinance No. 881 to second reading and waive the reading
in fulland grant negative declaration.
Vote:
F. Change Z ne 9189
Applicant: S.J.V. Development Inc.
Location: Between Blodgett and Record, west of State
Street.
A proposal to change the zone of approximately 173
acres from A and W-2 to R-1, R-2 and C-1
Ordincnc for introduction - Ordinance No. 878
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto, California approving Change of Zone 9-99
amending Zoning Map of the City of San Jacinto
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to introduce
Ordinance No. 878 to second reading and waive the reading
in full and grant negative declaration.
Vote:
October 17, 1989 Agenda
Page 4
G. General Plan Amendment 10-89
Applicant: S.J.V. Development Inc.
Location: Between Blodgett and Record, west of State
Street.
A proposal to amend the Land Use Element of the
General Plan from Low Density Residential to Community
Commercial, Medium Density and Low Density.
Resolution for Adoption - Resolution No. 1652
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto approving an amendment to the General Plan
of the City of San Jacinto Third cycle of Calendar
Year 1989
Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to adopt
Resolution No. 1852 and waive the reading in full and grant
negative declaration.
Vote:
H. Comprehensive Development Plan 3-89 and Final Tract
Maps 23789, 23790 and 23791
Applicant: Friedman Homes, Inc.
Location: Areas and 6 of the San Jacinto Valley
Specific Plan, south of Evans, west of
Mountain Ave.
A request for approval of the Comprehensive Development
Plan and associated Final Tract Maps.
Motion by:Seconded by:Action:
Comprehensi
-
ve Development Plan 3-89.Vote:
to approve
Motion by:Seconded by: Action: to approve
Final Tract
-
Maps 23789, 23790 and 23791 and authorize
Mayor to execute the Subdivision Agreement.
III. ORAL COMMUNICATION
Members of the Audience wishing to address the City Council
s
h
o
u
l
d
f
i
l
l
out the appropriate form and hand it to the Deputy City Clerk prior
to the meeting. Council is prohibited by State law from ta
k
i
n
g
a
c
t
i
o
n
on items not listed on the agenda unless of an emergency natur
e
.
IV. CITY DEPARTMENTS
A. 2010 Steering Committee & Multi-Family Housing
Committee
B. Western Riverside Associated Governments (WRAG)
Motion by:_
Vote:
_Secondod by:
Action:
V. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/COMMENTS
A. Mayor Ford - Proclamation
B. Civic Center Committee Report
October 17, 1989 Agenda
Page 5
VI. ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Seconded by: Action: to adjourn Vote:
Meeting adjourned at P.m.
Next regular City Council meeting November 7, 1989
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR FUTURE ELECTRIC RATES
In April 1989, Southern California Edison Company put a major
project into service which was designed to improve the
reliability of our electric service. We recently filed an
Application with the California Public Utilities Commission
("CPUC") to increase our rates to recover the $72.6 million which
this project cost to construct. If our proposal is approved by
the CPUC, a rate increase of $6.7 million would go into effect on
January 1, 1991. The following is background information on our
Application.
WHAT WE ARE REQUESTING
We have asked the CPUC for permission to increase our
electric rates to recover the construction costs associated with
the High Voltage Direct Current Expansion Project ("HVDC
Expansion Project"). The HVDC Expansion Project improves our
ability to transport bulk power from the Pacific Northwest to our
rapidly growing population centers in Southern California.
If we are allowed to recover the full amount of our
construction costs there would be an increase of approximately
5 cents or 0.1 percent in the monthly bill of a residential
customer using 500 kilowatthours per month. Your costs, however,
may vary depending on your use of electricity and, whether or not
your participate in the Low Income Ratepayer Assistance ("LIRA")
Program.
- 1 -
REQUESTED RATE CHANGES
Here is how we have proposed the rate changes be divided
among all customer groups:
HVDC EXPANSION PROJECT
Application No. 89-10-001
(January 1, 1991 Effective Date)
PROPOSED
AVERAGE
INCREASE CUSTOMER GROUP RATE CHANG
($million)
(%) (/kWh*)
Domestic
Lighting - Small & Medium
Power
Large Power
Agricultural & Pumping
Street & Area Lighting
TOTAL
cent per kilowatthour
PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE HELD
2.0
2.2
2.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
1 /100
1/100
1/100
1/100
1/100
1/100 6.7 0 .1
Before acting on our request, the CPUC may hold public
participation hearings to provide you the opportunity to express
your views. If they are scheduled, you will be notified in a
future bill of the dates, times and locations of these hearings.
If you cannot attend these hearings, you may submit written
comments to the CPUC by writing to the Public Advisor's Office,
California Public Utilities Commission, Room 5109, 107 South
Broadway, Los Angeles, California 90012. Please mention that you
2
are writing about Application No. 89-10-001 (HVDC Expansion
Project) of Southern California Edison Company.
The CPUC will hold formal evidentiary hearings to receive the
sworn testimony of the parties to the case. At these hearings,
the CPUC will receive the testimony of Edison's witnesses, the
testimony of other interested parties, and the Division of
Ratepayer Advocates ("DRA"). The DRA consists of engineers,
accountants, economists and attorneys who independently evaluate
the proposals of utilities for rate increases and present their
analyses and recommendations for the CPUC at evidentiary
hearings. The CPUC can accept, reject or modify the
recommendations of any of the parties.
If you would like information about how to participate in the
formal evidentiary hearings, contact the CPUC's Public Advisor's
Office at the address listed above. Again, please mention that
you are inquiring about Application No. 89-10-001 of Southern
California Edison Company.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
A copy of Edison's Application and related exhibits will be
furnished upon written request to:
Southern California Edison Company
2244 Walnut Grove Avenue
Rosemead, California 91770
Attention: James M. Lehrer, Attorney
3
A complete copy of this Application may be inspected at the
Edison offices or at the CPUC offices listed below:
EDISON OFFICES
2244 Walnut Grove Avenue
Rosemead, CA 91770
127 Elm Street
Long Beach, CA 90802
100 N. Harbor Boulevard
Santa Ana, CA 92703
10060 Telegraph Road
Ventura, CA 93004
152 South Grand Avenue
Covina, CA 91723
1700 E. Tahquitz-McCallum Way
Palm Springs, CA 92262
300 North Pepper Avenue
Rialto, CA 92376
321 West Main Street
Visalia, CA 93291
Pebbly Beach Generating Station
Avalon, CA 90704
OFFICES OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
State Building State Building
505 Van Ness Avenue 107 South Broadway
San Francisco, CA 94102 Los Angeles, CA 90012
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
Michael R. Peev
Executive Vice Pr
October 6, 1989
4
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
The City of San Jacinto has two openings on its Planning
Commission beginning November 1, 1989. The City Council is
seeking qualified applicants to serve a four year term.
While the minimum qualification for the job is residence in the
City limits or its Sphere of Influence, the Council is seeking
commissioners with an interest and experience in land planning.
Resumes should be submitted to the City Clerk no later than
October 25, 1989. Experience and qualifications should be
outlined in detail in order for the Mayor and council to accuracy
assess potential candidate.
Western coun1T agency *cle( ws fire By SYBEL ALGER The Press-Enterprise Perris and Corona officials are rebelling against a plan to create a western Riverside County council of governments, but represen-tatives of other cities and the county have embraced the idea. Some see the proposed Western Riverside County Association of Governments as an extra layer of government that will siphon tax dollars. Others see it as the only way to coordi- bonds, apply for grants, accept donations, nate regional planning for roads, housing and lease or build buildings and use eminent other issues. domain, the legal process by which govern- "Tell them we have had government up merit agencies acquire property through the to here," Perris Mayor Jean McHenry said at courts if owners refuse to sell. a recent City Council meeting, grasping her Annual dues would be based on popula-throat with her hands. "What gives them the tion and assessed valuation within each city right to tell us what to do?" or the unincorporated county areas. Riverside County Supervisor Kay Ceni- A revised agreement more clearly spells ceros said she understands frustration with out how the association's governing board government bureaucracy, but said cities and would cast votes, Ceniceros said. If one city the county are not communicating on vital did not want to participate in a project or issues that cross jurisdictional boundaries, allow a project to be built within its bound-Also, the state Legislature is pushing for sub- aries, that city could not be overruled, she regional organizations to coordinate state said. funding on problems such as smog, she said. The Perris and Corona councils have Representatives of 10 cities — Banning, voted not to join the association. Hemet, Beaumont, Corona, Hemet, Lake Elsinore, Banning and Riverside have approved the Moreno Valley, Norco, Perris, Riverside and concept. The other councils are expected to San Jacinto — plus Riverside County have vote soon. The next meeting is scheduled met periodically this summer to discuss the Sept. 11 in Moreno Valley. proposal. Earlier this month, Corona Mayor Rich- A subcommittee representing the county, ard Deininger Jr. sent a scathing, five-page Lake Elsinore, Norco and Riverside offered a letter to fellow mayors attacking the proposed draft joint powers agreement to set out the joint powers agreement point-by-point. association's operating rules. He questioned the purpose of the associa- It defines the association's purpose to " tion, saying, "Corona is not interested in . . provid(e) a forum for discussion, study interfering in our neighbors' business any and development of recommendations on re- more than we would appreciate Norco or ,gional problems of mutual interest and con- Riverside or the county interfering in Coro-cern." na." In addition to hiring employees and out- Ad hoc cooperation between cities should side consultants, the association could issue be undertaken instead of " . . . establishing a huge property-owning, debt-creating bureau-cracy," Deininger said. Hemet City Manager Joe Guzzetta said his council supports the association concept. The association would have no more authority than the cities would grant it, he said. "We do not consider it as a layer of government. We feel it would facilitate discus-sion among cities," Guzzetta said. For example, he said an association could have handled the ongoing Stephens' kangaroo rat study and allocation of Measure A trans-portation funds. Ceniceros said the revised draft agree-ment may not contain as many legal powers as first proposed. As city representatives work together and begin to trust each other, they may decide to expand the association's role, she said. The Coachella Valley Association of Gov-ernments is cited as the role model for the western group. Founded more than 15 years ago, the association has tackled many contro-versial issues, including restricting develop-ment of scenic mountainous areas above the valley. Ceniceros said the association gradually grew in scope and prestige. Its subcommit-tees, made up of city and county employees, do much groundwork on difficult issues be-fore making recommendations to the govern-ing board, which consists of elected officials from the various cities and the county. "CVAG's value is not in doing projects or making decisions. It is in finding areas of common interest and learning from each other. That in itself would be worthwhile," she said. Perris City Council member Reuben "Lefty" Jenkins sees no room for compro-mise. "We have SCAG (the Southern California Association of Governments) and the League of Cities. Why do we need another one?" he asked. Tell them we have had government up to here. What gives them the right to tell us what to do?, Jean McHenry Mayor of Perris
THOMAS, BYRNE & SMITH
AN ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Donald L. Thomas, C.P.A
D. Richard Byrne. C.P.A.
V. C. Smith. Jr., C.P.A.
Jerry D. Bigbie, C.P.A.
August 28, 1989 4362 Orange Street
Riverside. California 92501
(714) 682-4851
City Council
City of San Jacinto
San Jacinto, California
We have completed the annual audit of the City's books and records for the year
ended June 30, 1989 and present the following comments and recommendations
relative to accounting procedures and system development and the strengthening
of internal accounting controls over the City's financial activities:
(1)
Main Street Project
Through June 30,1989 the City had spend approximately $54,000 towards the Main
Street Project and been reimbursed $19,800 by the County of Riverside
Economic/Community Development Department (ECD) using Federal Community
Development Block Grant Funds. An additional $8,300 of reimbursements is
reflected in the City's Housing and Community Development Fund at June 30, 1989.
ECD has also designated another $11,900 for this project.
After reviewing the planning study submitted by the Downtown Business
Association, the County has concerns regarding the eligibility of the Main Street
Project for federal funding.
In order to be eligible under 24CFR 570.205, the funded activities shall enable
the recipient to: (1) determine its needs; (2) set long-term goals and short-
term objectives; (3) devise programs to meet these goals and objectives; (4)
evaluate the progress of the programs in accomplishing the goals; and (5) carry
out management, coordination and monitoring activities necessary for effective
planning management.
City Council
City of San Jacinto
August 28, 1989
Page 2.
The City could be required to reimburse the $19,800 and may never receive either
of the additional amounts totalling $20,200 if it is determined that this program
is not eligible for federal funding.
We recommend the City assist in resolving the County's concerns relative to the
eligibility of the Main Street Program for federal funding.
(2)
Cash Receipting Procedures
During the course of our audit, we noted that copies of billing statements
prepared and mailed by the Police Department were not submitted to the Finance
Department as required by the City's cash receipting procedures.
Copies of the completed statements are necessary in order for the Finance
Department to incorporate the billings into the City's accounting system and
provide for appropriate follow-up on delinquent collections.
We recommend finance personnel instruct the police department on appropriate cash
receipting and billing procedures.
We further recommend a copy of the cash receipting procedures be reviewed and
initialled by appropriate employees in each department for retention in their
personnel file.
Summation
This letter is not intended to imply that our tests failed to disclose many
commendable features in the current operating procedures of the City. However,
from a standpoint of practicality, this letter is limited to situations which
in our judgement merit or could benefit from refinement.
City Council
City of San Jacinto
August 28, 1989
Page 3.
We would like to take this opportunity to express our appreciation for the
assistance extended us during the course of our audit.
If we can be of further assistance or if you have any questions regarding our
recommendations, please call our office.
Respectfully submitted,
THOMAS, BYRNE & SMITH
An Accountancy Corporation
By: D. Richard Byrne
Certified Public Accountant
DRB/kcm
AGE N
s
MINUTES
San Jacinto City Council
and the Council Sitting as
the Redevelopment Agency
and Industrial Development Authority
Regular Meeting
October 3, 1989
The regular meeting of the San Jacinto City Council, the Council sittin
g
a
s
t
h
e
Redevelopment Agency and Industrial Development Authority was called to
o
r
d
e
r
by Mayor Ford at 7:32 p.m.
Roll Call - Present: Councilmen Rose, Divine, Redding, Boykin and Ford
Staff Members Present: City Manager Nammar, Community Development Dire
c
t
o
r
McNabb, Police Chief Kozma, Assistant Planner Nishino
and Deputy City Clerk Sherman
CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of Minutes of September 19, 1989 as submitted.
B. Approval of Warrants No.s 20285 through 20443 in the amount of $704,39
2
.
1
5
as submitted by the Finance Director.
C. Resolution No. 1848 for adoption; designating the Environmnetal Health Di
v
-
ision of the Health Department to the Local Solid Waste Management Enforc
e
-
ment Agency for the County of Riverside.
D. Resolution No. 1849 for adoption; in support of counting everyone residi
n
g
in this country regardless of citizenship status.
E. Ordinance No. 875 for adoption; amending Chapter (8.04) of the San Jacin
t
o
Municipal Code relating to Neighborhood Beautification.
F. Claim of Letitia and Scotty Dean Meek for the wrongful taking of personal
property. (Staff recommends denial.)
G. Authorization for staff to execute Memorandum of Understanding between t
h
e
City of San Jacinto and the Public Employees Association of Riverside Co
u
n
t
y
,
Inc. (City Manager recommends approval.)
H. Acceptance of Declaration of Posting Agenda pursuant to the City Attorne
y
.
Councilman Redding moved to approve the consent calendar, adopt Ordina
n
c
e
N
o
.
8
7
5
(amending the previous minutes by excluding alleys) and Resolutions No.
s
1848 and 1849 and waive reading in full.
Seconded by Councilman Rose
Motion carried 5-0.
(Item G. The Council requested that ground rules be established for fu
t
u
r
e
negotiations; details of the Memorandum of Understanding not be made pub-
lic until the Council has ratified the agreement. Item E. Councilman
Redding asked the Mayor to send a letter to all who worked on the Commit
t
e
e
.
Also requested the addition of a Code Enforcement Officer.)
II PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Change of Zone 13-89 and Planned Unit Development 4-89. Applicant:
K
e
n
n
e
t
h
Cokeley. Location: Northeast side of Idyllwild Drive, 200 ft. northwest of
Tiger Lane. A proposal to change the zone on approximately 9.5 acres fro
m
R-T to 17-2 Planned Unit Development Overlay on Tract 24713. Community
Development Director McNabb explained the request briefly and stated a va
r
-
iance (Variance 4-89) has been requested to the required 25 ft. average
front yard in the PUD regulations to 21 ft. The Mayor opened the public
hearing. The Clerk stated notice of the hearing has been advertised; af
-
fidavit of publication is on file. Property owners of record within 30
0
NOT OFTAL
APFROVED BY COUNCIL
II Public Hearings - continued
ft. have been notified by mail; declaration of mailing is on file. No
oral or written comments have been received by the clerk.
B. Tentative Tract 24713 and Variance 4-89 is part of II A, has also been
advertised; affidavit of publication is on file. Property owners of rec
o
r
d
within 300 ft. have been notified by mail. No oral or written comments
h
a
v
e
been received by the clerk. The Mayor opened the public hearing on this
item. Jim [inland, 41640 Florida Avenue, Hemet, representing the applicant,
answered questions concerning the drainage for the project. Jan Leahy,
990 Chase, asked about the 7,200 sq. ft. required for single residential
dwellings. Planned Unit Developments are not in the same category. The
Council discussed these proposals, including drainage and age limitation
s
and acted as follows:
Councilman Divine moved to continue the public hearings on Items A and B
t
o
t
h
e
meeting of October 17, 1989.
Seconded by Councilman Rose
Motion carried 5-0.
C. Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2-89/The Fencing Regulations. Ordinance No.
877, amending Ordinance No. 340, the Zoning Ordinance, relating to fenci
n
g
and renumbering several articles of said Ordinance. Community Development
Director McNabb then explained that the Planning Commission held a hearing
and received comments from one individual, a letter from the Chamber of
Commerce previously and also one dated October 3, 1989 which suggested
minor changes. Councilman Redding asked if minor changes could be made
without sending the matter back to the Planning Commission. Mr. McNabb'
s
answer was yes as long as the changes are not substantial. The Council
agreed to the Chamber's recommendations in the draft. Commercial block
walls are not to exceed 8 feet in height. The Mayor opened the public
hearing. The clerk stated notice of the hearing has been advertised;
affidavit of publication is on file. Property owners of record within
300 ft. have been notified by mail; declaration of mailing is on file.
The clerk has received no oral or written comments. The Mayor asked if
anyone in the audience wished to be heard. The following spoke: Fran
Hall, 1695 State Street, in favor of only block wall for commercials.
Don Garner, 37101 Eaton, Hemet, protested the ordinance, limiting his
comments to his commercial property. William Rose, 220 DeAnza Drive,
says the dictionary defines a fence as an enclosure to protect, repel
or ward off; objects to ordinance in that "beauty (fences) is in the
eyes of the beholder." Elmo Thibodeaux, 655 San Marcos, stated he has a
basic right to have a fence on his property; the City has no right to ba
s
e
regulations on aesthetics but only on the basis of health and safety.
No one else spoke; the Mayor closed the hearing.
Councilman Boykin moved to introduce Ordinance No. 877 as amended to se
c
o
n
d
reading and waive reading in full.
Seconded by Councilman Redding
Motion on roll call vote: Ayes: Councilmen Boykin, Redding and Rose. Noes;
Councilmen Divine and Ford.
Vote must be unanimous or ordinnace must be read in full. Motion withdra
w
n
.
Another motion was made.
Couhcilman Redding moved to introduce amended Ordinance No. 877 to seco
n
d
r
e
a
d
-
and waive reading in full.
Seconded by Councilman Rose
Motion carried 4-1. Councilman Ford abstained.
3 October 1989
-2-
NC ;.ICIAL LNTL
APPCCL i2,Y COUNCIL
III ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
A. Jan Leahy, 990 Chase. Wants to have an invocation before meeti
n
g
s
;
H
e
m
e
t
Council and U.S. governing bodies do. Asked why staff does not
f
o
l
l
o
w
u
p
on Council requests. Wants a meeting between the City and Main
S
t
r
e
e
t
Program to determine what the City can and cannot do to provide f
o
r
t
h
e
Potato Festival.
B. Marcelo Olivas, 973 Camphor Court, concerning the electrical conn
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
necessary for the Potota Festival. The City Manager suggested re
n
t
i
n
g
a
generator would be a much less expensive alternative to installa
t
i
o
n
o
f
an electric box.
C. Nancy Bottomley, 665 E. Old 2nd Street, re animal control probl
e
m
.
H
a
s
been complaining for more than a year about dogs running loose,
b
i
t
i
n
g
people and scaring children. The Police Chief assured her that
a
c
t
i
o
n
would be taken.
D. Amber Navarro, 674 E. Old 2nd Street, had essentially the same
c
o
m
p
l
a
i
n
t
as Mrs. Bottomley.
IV CITY DEPARTMENTS
A. Resolution No. IDA-89-1 for adoption; a resolution of the Indust
r
i
a
l
Authority of the City of San Jacinto adopting the By-Laws of th
e
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
.
Industrial Authority Member Boykin moved to adopt Resolution No
.
I
D
A
-
8
9
-
1
a
n
d
waive reading in full.
Seconded by Industrial Authority Member Rose
Motion carried 5-0.
B. Resolution No. IDA-89-2 for adoption; a resolution of the Indust
r
i
a
l
A
u
t
h
-
ority of the City approving the application of Edelbrock Foundry
C
o
r
p
o
r
a
-
tion
Industrial Authority Member Divine moved to adopt Resolution No.
I
D
A
-
8
9
-
2
,
b
o
n
d
s
not to exceed S7,000,000, and waive reading in full.
Seconded by Industrial Authority Member Redding
Motion carried 5-0.
C. Resolution No. 1850 for adoption; declaring intention of the Cou
n
c
i
l
t
o
initiate on its own motion proceedings to annex certain Uninhabi
t
e
d
T
e
r
-
ritory known as Annexation No. 64.
Councilman Redding moved to adopt Resolution No. 1850 and waive
r
e
a
d
i
n
g
i
n
f
u
l
l
.
Seconded by Councilman Divine
Motion carried 5-0.
D. Resolution No. 1851 for adoption; declaring intention of the Co
u
n
c
i
l
t
o
initiate on its own motion proceedings to annex certain Inhabited
T
e
r
r
i
-
tory known as Annexation No. 65.
Councilman Rose moved to adopt Resolution No. 1851 and waive re
a
d
i
n
g
i
n
f
u
l
l
.
Seconded by Councilman Divine
Motion carried 5-0.
E. Landscaping Maintenance Bid No. 89-90-1. Twelve requests for bid
w
e
r
e
mailed; ten were returned. The low bidder did not meet the bid
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
-
cations. Not the proper time to rebid; April a better time.
Councilman Redding moved to negotiate and leave in place the pre
s
e
n
t
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
and work out those areas of concern.
Seconded by Councilman Divine
Motion carried 5-0
3 October 1989
j MUM_ UNTIL
AFPI:OVED BY COUNCIL
V MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS REPORTS/COMMENTS
A. Councilman Redding congratulated the two Councilmen who participated in
the Senior Olympics.
B. Councilman Divine congratulated the City Manager and staff in keeping the
Main Street Program.
C. Councilman Boykin wants information on the new Civic Center. As a member
of the Committee he asked staff to put together something and bring it to
the Council. The City Manager said that we are now in a position to be
able to put something together and present it to the Council.
D. Councilman Rose complained that watering on Evans Street is too infrequent
to be of any value. Also, there is a lot,of scrap lumber, tile, etc. left
around. Either the contractor should take it to the dump, or he should
be forced to obtain a bin from the City's trash hauler. Staff will check
this out.
E. Councilman Redding mentioned the structure of the 2010 Committee and asked
why the Mayor is looking for a new committee. The City Manager recommended
the Council appoint five new members to the All American Committee.
F. Mayor Ford mentioned the Maddy legislation re multiple housing committee
and suggested two meMbers each from the Council and Planning Commission
serve on the committee.
VI ADJOURNMENT
Councilman Divine moved to adjourn.
Seconded by Councilman Rose
Motion carried 5-0.
Meeting adjourned at 11:18 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Helen Sherman
Deputy City Clerk
3 October 1989 -4-
TY m SAN JACINTO
1ER OF AUDITED DEMANDS OLci-22
UNITED CALIFORNJA BANK
-TIO 10/15/89
t
TPTION
AMOUNT
75.00
500.00
34.07
260.00
29.00
13.485.32
207.80
852.21
2 5.967,21
11.992043
11./25.21
22,00
115,00
425.00
390„00
2.932.56
950000
410.00
153.00
663.42
12 k 096.00
2,563+58
77 •509.62
10.84
67,60
66.25
49.30
67,95
107.44
2,350.26
2'26.88
14.56
600.00
17+64
69.04
55.00
60.30
37.47
675.00
2.218.84
383.90
20.00
106.00
415.03
235.09
504.47
520+17
572.96
251.02
741.38
-,44* AALR& 'SEMINAR -RANDOLPH
POSTAGE -WTR.DILLS
•:,,46* U.S. BUL!<. MAILING -PLNO,
2 ,.)447* INTERNAT LAW SCHOOL FEES -P.D,
'.48* KEVIN vi TRICK SCHOOL EXPENSES -P.D.
,49* HEALTH H.)., INSURANCE
HEf4...-H1 COBRA
BLUE C HEALTH INSURANCE
- BLUE GOBRA
2 ,34:.-_,3* STANDARD D
20454* PUBLIC E -EM NHuIU...REMENT
21)455* PUBLIC EH 1kM .*FIREMENT
2c)456* CITY C ., COUNCIL LuNPLRIoNCL
WESTERN 1'Es 3i4--El TUITION -P,D.
2•458* STEVEN ..LINEOUE SCHOOL FEES
2)459* w6iLk SCHOOL. FEES-P.D.
WORH COOP. RFkiFISH ACCOUNT
20461* U.S, POSTMASTER ki.),IMUk!::::=E MEIER
20462* HELEN SHERMAN DEPUTY CITY CLERK
20463* DERNICT.: !.-MM BLOOD Pkr.ssURE NUksL
20464* ROBIN '.-.tft:-HLPD PAYROLL
20465* FIRST D-I..RSTATE DANK FEBERAL TAXES
20466* STA -1E 0!“ onLIFORNIA STATE TAXES
20467* CITY OF SAN JACINTO NET PAYROLL
20468 JOSEPH M, KUZMA REIMBURSEMENT GAS
20469 BARBARA THOMAS SCHOOL EXPENSES -E 0D
20470 DEHNIG HCHoGi..
20471 A-1 LOCk KEY REPAIR LOCK
20472 ADLERHORSI INT, INC, LEff'S1 0DOO FOOD -P,D.
20473 ARROW PRINTING ENVELOPES -P.0D.
20474 AUTO BODY OF HEM ET ..;L 'N '? 0EHIC1
20475 D & W PIRL CO. 1.Y'-.:RTG -PARKS DEPT,
20476 HECTOR 'f.JAEO:.A RETMB. MILEAGE
"2 0477 BIERLY 1.. ASSOCIATEG OTR. SERVILE FEE
20478 DODS LL .)-1BER REDI MIX
20479 BURTRONICS BUSINESS FAX PAPER -P.D. & CIVIC CENTER
20480
C. :r SEMINAR-MC NABB
20481 CALIF. CONTINUING CA. ZONING PRACTICE
20482 EMPLOYMENT DEV. DE1 .0 UNEMP. BENEFITS
20483 JAMES CALRINS COMMUNITY CENTER ADDITION
20484 CITY OF SAN JACINTO CONSUMER DEPOSITS
20485 COM GER CO. RADIO REPAIRS -F,D„
20486 CREDIT BUREAU OF CORONA TRW CHECKS -P0D,
20487 DAmuN REFERENCE LAD. LABORATORY FEES -P.D.,.
20488 DAVID TAYLOR JET 40 BALL VALVE-WATER
20489 DEW-PAR SALES & SERVICE SEWER TRAILER
20490 DIVINE ,'S INSURANCE INLAND MARINE POLICY
20491 EASTERN MONI.WATER DIST UTILITIES
20492 EVANS TIRE CO. TIRES REPAIRS
20493 FIRST IWILRSIAIE oANK INDUGTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
20494 GTE EGUIP0 MAINT. 1" .0. COMM, CENTER
'AN JACINTO
OLCD12
ITT AUDITED DEMANDS
UNITED CALI RNIA BANK A/C 201398
DA T 10./1.
-DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
290.04
4,20
187.47
135.43
194.35
11.18
1.560,43
240,60
149.00
98.20
4,488.92
3.275.84
153,
325.0 .D
222,20
54.13
54,00
91.65
42.40
290,32
50.00
10.00
523.57
116.00
87,13
38.86
67.08
26.72
:1.28.62
-408400
804. (JO
:1. • 65 14.01.
•4e9.39
:1.2,74
303,53
11 227.00
20,00
'30,59 . 138
755.00
270.24
-333,00
.428.73
(.4)0
53 4.1
839,40
31. •20
1.240,89
5.000.13
7.295.00
32.50
-a-
TT0495 GENERAL TELEPHONE 304
JACK GOSCH IuRD
20497 JIM HAMZA CHRYSLER
-20492 HEMET DOOR CO, 1NC,
20499 jEMET NEWT,
2N500 HLmEi RUT0wP STAMP
-.MET CO,
IMAGING
DAVE HET.: TERIGH
HOT SHOTS 1 HOUR PHOTO
.)5 How E OF SUALITY
• STATIONERY
20.'07 1 GITELAL ASPHALT
J & M LANDSCAPE
JOHNSON TRACTOR CO.
20510 KERN EQUIPT. CO.
20511 LLY HEATING & AIR GOND.
20512 LINDA LUNSTROM
MARDEN -SUSCO
20514 MARY BETH MARTIN
HASSAN MEHRKHAH M.D.
EDWARD MURRAY
20517 mANAGEMENT
20518 PAGENET
20519 PARAGON PRESS
20520 LARRY PIERCE PLUMBING
PRESS-ENTERPRISE
20522 ED RABY
20523 RACEWAY FORD
RAMONA ANInN2 HAVEN INC
20525 READY SERVICES
20524 RECOGNITION INC.
205,27 RAY REEDER
20522 RIVERSIDE BLUE PRINT
20529 CO. OF RIVERSIDE
20530 RIVERSIDE COUNTY
20531 RIVERSIDE COUNTY
20532 RIVERSIDE CO. ROAD DEPT
20533 ODAS ROSE
20534 SAFETY -RI EEN GORP.
20535 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
20536 CITY OF SAN jACINTO
20537 SCOTSMAN MANUFACTURING
20538 SE TON NAME PLATE GO.
20539 SHARP BUILDING SUPPLY
20540 RICK SHEPHERD
20541 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON
20542 SO, CALIFORNIA GAS CO,
20543 SUNSHINE NURSERY
20544 TAC EXTERMINATORS
20545 VALLEY STEEL & WELDING
TEL, COMM.
PARTS-UNIT 4125
GASKET-UNIT 902
PEPAIR DOOR 0 FIRE DEPT,
LEGAL ADVERTISING
STAMPS -0 -1 1 )IG CENTER
SUPPLIES
mEriTGH 2FRVIGFS-P.D „
WELD ABATEMENT
ITILm Pk2GEsTGING
PARis
OFFICE SUPPLIES
GOLD MIX
MAIMT,- PARKHILL
PARTS UNIT 412 & 419
SEAL REPAIR KIT -4423
PLIUND GRADING PERMIT
OVERPAYMENT WATER
WTR. PIPE & SUPPLIES
REPAIRS OF VFWMLF
PHYSICAL EXAM -F.D,
RENTim ATTENDANT
flONTRACTOR INFO. SYSTEM
REN)AL RADIO PAGERS
DOOR
I' !NCI DEPT,
WATER SUPPLIES
SUBSCRIPTIONS & ADS
REIMBURGE GAS MILEAGE
PARTS -P.D.
ANIMALS -SEPTEMBER
REPAIR DUCT-C.C.
DECALS
WORK BONE s CITY YARD
HYLAR
ASSESSMENT ROIT
MONEY DISTRIBUTION -P.D.
PROCESSING FEE
ESPLANADE AVENUE
WEED ADATEMENT WORK
SUPPLIES
TUITION-WILLIAMS/P.D.
UTILITY BILLS
MONTHLY LEASE
BARRICADE TAPE -F.D,
BUILDING SUPPLIES
REIMD, GAS MILEAGE
UTILITY
UTILITY
STREET TREE INSTALLATION & LLMD
SPRAYING AT MUSEUM
ANGULAR
(
20546
20547
20540
20549
VISION GRAPHICS
WELCH , HNIFORMS
WESTERN FARM SERVICE
XEROX CORPORATION
- - - - - -
FORMS-BLDO DE1:T4
UNIFORM CLEANING
PhLi.MC'r.:P CALIBER
Mf:V.;*.NTENANCE -P.D.
PAGE :2::
DAIL 10/15/29
AMOUNT
245
650,Z9
131.,6":3
440,;(..5
FINAL nyTAL 2321.840.6S
JACINTO
. ,.-)1.31.tTFLu DEMANDS
UNITEDIi /C 2013W:i
C _L ""Se - C) _e S A./NT 3AC -r INT L` CD
TREASURER'S OFFICE
TIME DEPOSIT REGISTER
Bank & Acct. No. Issued Maturity Rate
State of California
9833794 02-20-85 Open 8.833 2,500,000.
Red.5133120 01-19-88 Open 8.833
400,000.
Great Western
389-600153-8 09-05-89 10-05-89 8.60
0
50,000.
389-602909-1 09-11-89 10-11-89 8.70
0
300,000.
389-602847-3 08-23-89 10-23-89 8.85
0
200,000.
* 389-605539-3 09-06-89 10-06-89 8
.
7
0
0
500,000.
389-606242-3 09-25-89 12-22-89 8.8
0
0
300,000.
Far West Savings
013-10432-8 09-06-89 11-07-89 8.800
98,000.
Red. 013-14016-5 09-06-89 11-07-89 8.800
98,000
013-16299-5 08-29-89 10-31-89 8,800
98,000.
Home Savings
107-022749-9 06-26-89 09-24-89 9.35
0
Closed
107-022763-0 09-16-89 10-16-89 8.40
0
300,000.
107-022764-8 09-16-89 10-16-89 8.40
0
300,000.
-0-
-0-
358.06
3,723.33
3,020.83
607.64
-0-
1,321.64
1,321.64
790.53
1,864.26
1,137.51
1,137.51
Amt. Inv. Int. This Mo.
Total Invested $5,144,000 $ 15,282.95
September 1989 Register
Federal I.D. No. 95-6000780
* County Trust Account
C "Sc''' CD A../q P, 1n1" 'I' 0
TREASURER'S OFFICE
TIME DEPOSIT REGISTER
CIVIC CENTER CONSTRUCTION PROJECT B
O
N
D
S
Bank & Acct. No. Issued Maturity Rate
Great Western Bank
389-603896-9 08-14-89 10-13-89 8
.
8
5
0
1,200,000.
389-603897-7 11-17-88 11-17-89 9.
0
0
0
1,420,000. 10,650.00
Home Savings
107-022762-2 08-02-89 10-31-89 8.
9
5
0
100,000. 745.83
107-022769-7 06-15-89 12-12-89 9.350 1,200,000. 9,350.00
Gibraltar Savings
099-00095570 09-25-89 10-25-89 8.
8
0
0
50,000. 373.34
8,850.00
Amt. Inv. Int. This Mo.
Total Invested $3,970,000. $ 29,969.17
September 1989 Register
Federal I.D. No. 95-6000780
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM R. VAN ORDER
1600 EAST FLORIDA AVENUE, SUITE 217
HEMET, CALIFORNIA 92344
(714) 929-3870
Attorney for Claimant ANDREW CORTEZ
In the matter of the claim of )
)
ANDREW CORTEZ ) CLAIM AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITY
)
Claimant, )
)
vs. )
)
CITY OF SAN JACINTO, )
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES 1 through )
100, DOES 1 through 100, )
inclusive, )
)
Respondents. )
)
William R. Van Order, attorney at law, on behalf of ANDREW
CORTEZ, hereby presents this claim to the CITY OF SAN JACINTO
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES 1 through 100, DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
pursuant to Sections, 905,905.2, 910, 910.2 of the California
Government Code.
1. Claimants post office address is 25826 Soboba Street,
Hemet, California 92344.
2. Notices concerning the claim should be sent to William
R. Van Order, Attorney at Law, 1600 E. Florida, Ave., Suite 217,
Hemet, California 92344.
3. The date and place of occurrence giving rise to this
claim are May 9, 1989 at S/R 79 north of Gilman Springs Road,
County of Riverside.
CLAIM AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITY
PAGE 2
4. The circumstances giving rise to this claim are as
follows: At the above date and place, claimant, ANDREW CORTEZ
received personal injuries under the following circumstances: a
1979 Chevy Police Van driven by Officer George Edward Snyder,
whom at the time was an employee of the City of San Jacinto,
Police Department, while acting within the scope of his
employment, struck claimant ANDREW CORTEZ. MR. CORTEZ was
northbound on S/R 79 when he noticed a vehicle traveling
southbound at high speed, at which time MR. CORTEZ slowed his
vehicle, however was struck by the oncoming vehicle and in
addition was rear-ended by the 1979 Chevy Van driven by Officer
George Edward Snyder, thereby causing personal injuries to
Claimant ANDREW CORTEZ.
5. Claimant ANDREW CORTEZ suffered a contusion to the head
and lumbosacral sprain and is presently suffering from
vetebrogenic cephalgia and cervical whiplash, with neck and back
pains as a result of the impact. The aforementioned injuries are
the direct and proximate result of the breach of duty of care of
respondents GEORGE EDWARD SNYDER, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, GOVERNMENT
AGENCIES 1 through 100, DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, who owed
a duty of due care to claimant ANDREW CORTEZ under section 21453
of the California Vehicle Code.
6. At the filing of this claim, it is known to William R.
Van Order, Claimant ANDREW CORTEZ has incurred damages in the
sum of $ 33,000.00 due to the aforesaid injuries computed on the
basis of the following actual and projected medical expenses in
CLAIM AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITY PAGE 3
the amount of $ 6,000.00 and general damages in the amount of $
25,000.00 and in addition actual loss of earnings in the sum of
$ 2,000.00.
7. William R. Van Order alleges on behalf of Claimant
ANDREW CORTEZ that respondants GEORGE EDWARD SNYDER and DOES 21
through 25, inclusive, while acting within the scope of their
employment with the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, Police Department, were
responsible and negligent in their driving and controlling of
said 1979 Chevy Van Police Vehicle.
8. William R. Van Order further alleges on behalf of
Claimant ANDREW CORTEZ that respondents CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES 21 through 40 and DOES 26 through 35,
inclusive, were responsible and negligent in their care and
maintenance of the aforementioned 1979 Chevy vehicle.
DATED: October 6,1989
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM R. VAN ORDER
By:
VERIFICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CDC\ . OF
I have read the foregoing
and know its contents.
r4 CHECK APPLICABLE PARAGRAPH
I am a party to this action. The matters stated in the foregoing document
a
r
e
t
r
u
e
o
f
m
y
o
w
n
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
e
x
c
e
p
t
a
s
t
o
those matters which are stated on information and belief, and as to tho
s
e
m
a
t
t
e
r
s
I
b
e
l
i
e
v
e
t
h
e
m
t
o
b
e
t
r
u
e
.
I am 0 an Officer a partner of
a party to this action, and am authorized to make this verification for and o
n
i
t
s
b
e
h
a
l
f
,
a
n
d
I
m
a
k
e
t
h
i
s
v
e
r
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
t
h
a
t
reason. 0 I am informed and believe and on that ground allege that the
m
a
t
t
e
r
s
s
t
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
f
o
r
e
g
o
i
n
g
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
true. El The matters stated in the foregoing document are true of my own
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
e
x
c
e
p
t
a
s
t
o
t
h
o
s
e
m
a
t
t
e
r
s
w
h
i
c
h
a
r
e
stated on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe them t
o
b
e
t
r
u
e
.
I am one of the attorneys for
a party to this action. Such party is abscntfrom the county of aforesaid wh
e
r
e
s
u
c
h
a
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
s
h
a
v
e
t
h
e
i
r
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
,
a
n
d
I
m
a
k
e
this verification for and on behalf of that party for that reason. I am informed and believe and on that groun
d
a
l
l
e
g
e
t
h
a
t
the matters stated in the foregoing document are true.
Executed on , 19 , at California.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Californ
i
a
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
f
o
r
e
g
o
i
n
g
i
s
t
r
u
e
a
n
d
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
.
Type or Print Name
Signature
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF DOCUMENT
(other than summons and complaint)
Received copy of document described as
on
19
Type or Print Name
Signature
PROOF OF SERVICE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COUNTY OF
I am employed in the county of Riverside , State of California.
I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
i
s
1600 East Plorida
Avenue, Suite 217, Hemet, CA 97344
On 10/6 19 89. I served the foregoing document described as
ENTITY
on___Lr_i . et
in this action by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelop
e
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
e
d
a
s
f
o
l
l
o
w
s
:
City of San Jacinto
201 E. Main Street
San Jacinto, CA
[1] (BY MAIL) I caused such envelope with postage thereon fully pre
p
a
i
d
t
o
b
e
p
l
a
c
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
U
n
i
t
e
d
S
t
a
t
e
s
m
a
i
l
at , California.
Executed on 19 , at , California.
(BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I caused such envelope to be delivered by h
a
n
d
t
o
t
h
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
e
e
.
Executed October on , California.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Californi
a
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
i
s
t
r
u
e
a
n
d
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
.
I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this cou
r
t
a
t
w
h
o
s
e
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
h
e
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
w
a
s
made.
ea (State)
0 (Federal)
John Zimmerman
Type or Print Name
STuARTS ExBROOK TWESAvER (REVISES 6/53',
(May be oboe fl Cabtomm Slate or Feberal Courts)
ORDINANCE NO. 877 2
3
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
O
F
S
A
N
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE 340,
T
H
E
Z
O
N
I
N
G
ORDINANCE, RELATED TO FENCING AND RENUMBERIN
G
S
E
V
E
R
A
L
ARTICLES AT SAID ORDINANCE.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
D
O
E
S
H
E
R
E
B
Y
O
R
D
A
I
N
A
S
FOLLOWS:
9
10
11
12
Section 1. Ordinance No. 340, the Land Use Ordinance of
t
h
e
City of San Jacinto, is hereby amended as fo
l
l
o
w
s
:
A. Article 23, Sections 23.65 and 23.66 are
repealed.
B. Articles 18A, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23 are
renumbered to Articles 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, an
d
2
5
respectfully.
4
r,
6
C. Article 19 is established in accordance w
i
t
h
Exhibit "A", attached.
Section 2. This Ordinance will take effect thirty (30)
d
a
y
s
from the passage thereof.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
o
f
this ordinance and cause the same to be publ
i
s
h
e
d
in a newspaper of general circulation printe
d
a
n
d
published in the County of Riverside, State
o
f
California.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of said City
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
o
n
t
h
e
3
r
d
day of October, 1989.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeti
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
s
a
i
d
C
i
t
y
Council on the day of , 1989 by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Mayor
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
99
9 3
24
9 5
96
27
28 Deputy City Clerk
29
30
31
3 9
ORDINANCE 877
FENCE REGULATIONS
1. PURPOSE
The purpose of these fencing and hedge regulations is
to create standards governing location and materials, and review
procedures which will clarify the regulations and achieve
consistency within the context of the neighborhood and the entire
City. The objective is to protect and reconcile the often
conflicting goals of aesthetics, privacy, security, view sight
lines and drainage.
2. APPLICABILITY
These regulations apply to all fencing installed in the
City after the effective date of this Ordinance and all existing
fencing which is replaced, whether voluntarily or due to lack of
maintenance or poor construction. Regulations regarding hedges
apply retroactively to all lots in the City.
For the purposes of this ordinance, a fence shall be
defined as a structure more than 18" in height, the purpose of
which is to either partially or totally define property
boundaries or create or define portions of yards, or secure or
private areas.
3. REVIEW PROCEDURE
A building permit shall be required for all fencing
allowed under these regulations. Prior to the issuance of a
building permit, it shall be the responsibility of the Community
Development Department to review fencing plans for compliance
with these regulations.
4. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
4.1 SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL USES
This section shall pertain to lots that contain not
more than two (2) dwelling units, which are not covered under
Section 4.6 and 4.7.
4.1.1 PERMITTED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as prohibited by subsection 4.1.3, fencing shall
be allowed along the front setback line, any side lot line, the
rear lot line, and any area within the yard created by the lot
lines and setback line described in this subsection.
ORDINANCE 877
FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE NO. 1
4.1.2 REQUIRED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as prohibited by subsection 4.1.3 below, fencing
is required on newly developed lots, at all front setback lines,
street side property lines, rear property lines abutting a
street, and around rear yards. For the purposes of this
subsection, the word "street" shall include public and private
streets, publicly maintained alleys, and driveways serving flag
lots, provided said driveway serves at least two lots and is at
least 20 feet wide.
Fencing shall also be required between the uses listed
in section 4.1 and other uses listed in the subsection beginning
with 4.2.
If a property owner feels extenuating circumstances
related to a view or a hillside lot exist, which make this
required fencing undesirable, the property owner may appeal in
accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 4.1.3.
Slopes are generally discouraged. Where possible, a
retaining wall of up to 6' in height shall be constructed to
eliminate a slope. Where a property line corresponds to the top
of a slope, fencing shall be installed at the top of the slope.
City staff is authorized and directed to allow higher than 6' of
retaining where extenuating circumstances exist.
4.1.3 PROHIBITED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as herein provided in this subsection, fencing
is prohibited between the front setback line and the
street,between the street side lot line and the street, and
between the rear lot line and an adjacent street. However,
should the distance between the street side lot line or the rear
lot line and their respective adjacent sidewalk is less than four
feet, the fence may be placed against the rear of the sidewalk if
an encroachment permit is first obtained.
Where fencing is installed between the street side
property line and the street side setback line, said fence shall
not extend any closer than 30 feet to the front property line.
Fencing that creates a safety problem because it
substantially blocks visibility of vehicles or pedestrians is
prohibited.
ORDINANCE 877
FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE NO. 2
If a property owner feels extenuating circumstances
exist which warrant the placement of a fence in a prohibited
location, said property owner may petition in writing the
Director of Community Development for approval, describing what
these circumstances are. The Director shall review the request,
verify in the field the accuracy of the circumstances, and either
approve or deny the request. If the request is denied, the
matter may be appealed to the Planning Commission and can be
further appealed to the City Council. The Council's decision
shall be final. Normally, an exemption shall only be granted for
fencing along side lot lines. However, where fencing on more
than 50% of the lots on the same side of the street in a block
containing fencing in a prohibited location, the Community
Development Director shall allow conformance with existing
fencing.
Special consideration shall be given to historic homes.
4.1.4 MATERIALS
Where fencing is required by subsection 4.1.2, and is
facing a street, fencing materials shall be wrought iron type,
masonry, concrete, brick, or an acceptable equivalent or a
combination thereof, excepting that between differing land uses
fencing materials shall be masonry. Gates in this required
fencing shall be wrought iron type, chain link, or a material
acceptable to the Community Development Department.
All other permitted fencing may be of any other -
durable material but shall not include barbed wire, razor wire or
any other similar fencing or fencing that contains an electrical
charge that can be touched from outside the fence.
Where a constant fencing type or theme exists in a
housing development, fencing that is replaced shall be consistent
with the existing fencing.
Where wood fencing is proposed, the support posts shall
be galvanized steel, set in concrete.
Fencing approved by the Department of Community
Development in the area normally prohibited from containing a
fence shall be of a material specified in the first paragraph of
This subsection. However, where fencing on more than 50% of the
lots on the same side of the street in a block contain non
conforming materials, the Community Development Director shall
also allow fencing of a type existing in that block except types
listed in the second paragraph.
Historic homes shall also be given special
consideration.
ORDINANCE 877 FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE NO. 3
4.1.5 HEIGHT OF FENCING
Required fencing shall be no less than five (5) feet in
height and no more than (6) feet, as measured from the highest
adjacent grade. All other permitted fencing shall be no more
than six (6) feet in height. If a special need exists for a
fence higher than six (6) feet (ie a tennis court), then a
variance may be applied for from the Planning Commission.
Where fencing has been approved in an area where it is
normally prohibited by these regulations, said fencing shall not
exceed 42" in height measured from the adjacent top of curb.
When a reverse corner lot situation exists, fencing
along the street side shall not exceed 42" unless said fence is
set back a minimum of 15 feet from the side lot line.
For the purpose of this subsection and all other
following sections, the required height shall be met on both
sides of the wall.
4.1.6 HEDGES
Hedges are permitted on all portions of a lot. Where
fences are prohibited, hedges shall be no higher than 42" above
the top of the adjacent curb. The maximum height of a hedge
anywhere else on a lot is eight (8) feet.
4.2 MULTIPLE FAMILY
This section shall pertain to lots that contain more
than two (2) dwelling units.
4.2.1 PERMITTED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as prohibited by subsection 4.2.3, fencing shall
be allowed along the front setback line, any side lot line, the
rear lot line, and any area within the yard created by the lot
lines and setback line described in this subsection.
4.2.2 REQUIRED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as prohibited by subsection 4.2.3 below, fencing
is required on newly developed lots, at all front setback lines,
street side property lines, rear property lines abutting a
street, and around rear yards. For the purposes of this
subsection, the word "street" shall include public and private
streets, publicly maintained alleys, and driveways serving flag
lots, provided said driveway serves at least two lots and is at
least 20 feet wide. Fencing is not required at the front setback
line as it intersects a driveway to a parking lot.
ORDINANCE 877
FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE NO. 4
Fencing shall also be required between the uses listed
in section 4.1 and other uses listed below beginning with
subsection 4.3 and the uses to which this section pertains.
Slopes are generally discouraged. Where possible, a
retaining wall of up to 6' in height shall be constructed to
eliminate a slope. Where a property line corresponds to the top
of a slope, fencing shall be installed at the top of the slope.
City staff is authorized and directed to allow higher than 6' of
retaining where extenuating circumstances exist.
4.2.3 PROHIBITED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as herein provided in this subsection, fencing
is prohibited between the front setback line and the
street,between the street side lot line and the street, and
between the rear lot line and an adjacent street. However,
should the distance between the street side lot line or the rear
lot line and their respective adjacent sidewalk is less than four
feet, the fence may be placed against the rear of the sidewalk if
an encroachment permit is first obtained.
Where fencing is installed between the street side
property line and the street side setback line, said fence shall
not extend any closer than 30 feet to the front property line.
Fencing that creates a safety problem because it
substantially blocks visibility of vehicles or pedestrians is
prohibited.
If a property owner feels extenuating circumstances
exist which warrant the placement of a fence in a prohibited
location, said property owner may petition in writing the
Director of Community Development for approval, describing what
these circumstances are. The Director shall review the request,
verify in the field the accuracy of the circumstances, and either
approve or deny the request. If the request is denied, the
matter may be appealed to the Planning Commission and can be
further appealed to the City Council. The Council's decision
shall be final. Normally, an exemption shall only be granted for
fencing along side lot lines.
4.2.4 MATERIALS
Where fencing is required by subsection 4.2.2, and is
visible from the street, fencing materials shall be wrought iron
type, masonry, concrete, brick, or an acceptable equivalent or a
combination thereof, excepting that between uses, fencing
materials shall be masonry. Gates in this required fencing shall
be wrought iron type, chain link, or a material acceptable to the
Community Development Director.
ORDINANCE 877
FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE NO. 5
All other permitted fencing may be of any other
durable material but shall not include barbed wire, razor wire or
any other similar fencing or fencing that contains an electrical
charge that can be touched from outside the fence.
Where wood fencing is proposed, the support posts shall
be galvanized steel, set in concrete.
Fencing approved by the Director of Community
Development or the City Council in the area normally prohibited
from containing a fence shall be of a material specified in the
first paragraph of this subsection.
4.2.5 HEIGHT OF FENCING
Required fencing shall be no less than five (5) feet in
height and no more than (6) feet. All other permitted fencing
shall be no more than six (6) feet in height. All fence heights
shall be measured from the highest adjacent grade.
Where the Director of Community Development or the City
Council has approved fencing in an area where it is normally
prohibited by these regulations, said fencing shall not exceed
42" in height measured from the adjacent top of curb.
When a reverse corner lot situation exists, fencing
along the street side shall not exceed 42" unless said fence is
set back a minimum of 15 feet from the side lot line.
4.2.6 HEDGES
Hedges are permitted on all portions of a lot. Where
fences are prohibited, hedges shall be no higher than 42" above
the top of the adjacent curb. The maximum height of a hedge
anywhere else on a lot is eight (8) feet.
4.3 COMMERCIAL USE
This section shall pertain to lots that contain uses
allowed in the C-1 and C-2 zones.
4.3.1 PERMITTED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as prohibited below, fencing shall only be
allowed along an interior side lot line and a rear lot line.
Other fencing may be permitted behind the front setback line upon
a petition in accordance with Section 4.1.3.
ORDINANCE 877
FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE NO. 6
4.3.2 REQUIRED LOCATION
Except when prohibited by 4.3.3 fencing is required on
all newly developed lots along interior side lot lines and the
rear lot line.
Slopes are generally discouraged. Where possible, a
retaining wall of up to 6' in height shall be constructed to
eliminate a slope. Where a property line corresponds to the top
of a slope, fencing shall be installed at the top of the slope.
City staff is authorized and directed to allow higher than 6' of
retaining where extenuating circumstances exist.
4.3.3 PROHIBITED
Fencing is prohibited in all areas where it is not
permitted by Section 4.3.1.
4.3.4. MATERIALS
When constructed, the first six feet of perimeter
fencing which faces a street or residential area shall be solid
masonry, concrete, or similar material. All other fencing may be
constructed of masonry, wrought iron type, chain link, or an
acceptable equivalent.
Alternative fencing material may be approved by the Planning
Department, with appeal to the Planning Commission, if it finds a
need for the alternative fencing due to special security or
inventory display considerations.
4.3.5 HEIGHT
The height of fencing between commercial uses and
residential uses shall be six feet except the 20' closest to and
perpendicular to a street shall be no more than 42" high.
All other fencing for a commercial use shall not exceed
8' in height, unless the Planning Department, with appeal to the
Planning Commission for Conditional Use Permit, has approved a
higher fence for security reasons.
4.3.6 HEDGES
Hedges associated with commercial uses shall not exceed
42" in height.
ORDINANCE 877
FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE NO. 7
4.4 INDUSTRIAL USE
4.4.1 PERMITTED LOCATION
Except as otherwise prohibited, fencing may be
allowed behind front or streetside setback lines.
4.4.2 REQUIRED LOCATION OF FENCING
Fencing is not required unless there is outside storage
of materials or an attractive nuisance on a lot.
Slopes are generally discouraged. Where possible, a
retaining wall of up to 6' in height shall be constructed to
eliminate a slope. Where a property line corresponds to the top
of a slope, fencing shall be installed at the top of the slope.
City staff is authorized and directed to allow higher than 6' of
retaining where extenuating circumstances exist.
4.4.3 PROHIBITED LOCATION
Fencing is prohibited within any setback area
4.4.4 MATERIALS
When fencing is installed, it shall be constructed of
masonry, wrought iron type, chain link, or an acceptable
equivalent.
The Community Development Director shall determine, by
the nature of the business, whether screening is necessary. Such
determination may be appealed to the Planning Commission.
4.4.5 HEIGHT OF FENCING
Fencing facing a street, shall be no more than six (6)
feet in height. Other fencing shall not exceed eight (8) feet in
height.
If a special need exists for a fence higher than that
specified above, then a variance may be applied for from the
Planning Commission.
Generally, outside storage shall not exceed the height
of the fence.
4.4.6 HEDGES
Hedges shall be considered as fences for the purposes
of this subsection.
ORDINANCE 877
FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE NO. 8
4.5 MOBILEHOMES
4.5.1 MOBILEHOME PARKS
Mobilehome parks shall have be separated from differing
land uses by a six (6) foot masonry wall.
Street frontages shall have a six foot combination
decorative wall and wrought iron type fencing, which shall be
approved by the Planning Commission when it considers the
Conditional Use Permit application.
4.5.2 MOBILEHOME SUBDIVISIONS
Mobilehome subdivisions or mobilehomes on a single
family lot shall meet the requirements of Section 4.1 above.
Slopes are generally discouraged. Where possible, a
retaining wall of up to 6' in height shall be constructed to
eliminate a slope. Where a property line corresponds to the top
of a slope, fencing shall be installed at the top of the slope.
City staff is authorized and directed to allow higher than 6' of
retaining where extenuating circumstances exist.
4.6 AGRICULTURAL
4.6.1 DEFINITIONS
Agricultural Use--Any use listed in the Zoning Ordinance which
permits the keeping of animals.
Small agricultural use-a use on less than one net acre.
Large agricultural use-a use on one or more net acres.
4.6.2 SMALL AGRICULTURAL USES
Land which has a small agricultural use and one or more
dwelling units shall comply with Section 4.1 above.
Slopes are generally discouraged. Where possible, a
retaining wall of up to 6' in height shall be constructed to
eliminate a slope. Where a property line corresponds to the top
of a slope, fencing shall be installed at the top of the slope.
City staff is authorized and directed to allow higher than 6' of
retaining where extenuating circumstances exist.
ORDINANCE 877
FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE NO. 9
4.6.3 LARGE AGRICULTURAL USES
All other agricultural uses not covered by subsection
4.6.2 have no specific fencing requirements except that fencing
shall not create a traffic hazard.
4.7 OTHER USES
All other uses not previously listed in these
regulations shall have their fencing reviewed by the Planning
Commission if a public hearing is required or by the Community
Development Director if no public hearing is required.
Examples of uses not specifically mentioned herein are
Planned Unit Developments, Planned Community Developments,
recreational facilities,schools, and flood control basins.
5. NON-CONFORMITIES
Existing fencing not conforming to these regulations
shall be made to conform if said fencing is replaced for any
reason or if there is a substantial change in use, excepting that
damaged fencing may be replaced in kind if the damage is less
than 50% of the fence length.
6. MAINTENANCE
All fencing shall be maintained in a reasonably
attractive condition, free of graffiti, dry rot, etc. No fence
shall have any hazardous elements endangering the health or
welfare of any member of the public. Any fencing not maintained
in accordance with this section shall be considered a public
nuisance.
The City Council shall hold a hearing to make the final
determination of a public nuisance and shall issue an order of
action to be taken. If the property owner fails to comply with
the order, the City or its agent may enter onto private property
for the purposes of eliminating the public nuisance. Any costs
to the City shall be assessed as a lien on the property.
7. PENALTY
Any person violating these regulations shall be guilty
of an infraction, punishable by a fine of $100.00 for each day of
violation. Any person violating these regulations a second time
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a
fine of $500.00 per day for each day of violation and/or up to
thirty (30) days in jail.
ORDINANCE 877 FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE NO. 10
(rAVENCE REGULATIONS
PURPOSE
The purpose of these fencing and h
e
d
g
e
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
i
s
to create standards governing locat
i
o
n
a
n
d
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
,
a
n
d
r
e
v
i
e
w
procedures which will clarify t
h
e
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
a
c
h
i
e
v
e
consistency within the context of t
h
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
a
n
d
t
h
e
e
n
t
i
r
e
City. The objective is to prote
c
t
a
n
d
r
e
c
o
n
c
i
l
e
t
h
e
o
f
t
e
n
conflicting goals of aesthetics,
p
r
i
v
a
c
y
,
s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
,
v
i
e
w
s
i
g
h
t
lines and drainage.
2. APPLICABILITY
These regulations apply to all fenc
i
n
g
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
City after the effective date of th
i
s
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
,
a
n
d
a
l
l
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
fencing which is replaced, whether
v
o
l
u
n
t
a
r
i
l
y
o
r
d
u
e
t
o
l
a
c
k
o
f
maintenance or poor construction.
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
h
e
d
g
e
s
apply retroactively to all lots in
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
For the purposes of this ordinanc
e
,
a
f
e
n
c
e
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
defined as a structure more than 1
8
"
i
n
h
e
i
g
h
t
,
t
h
e
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
o
f
which is to either partially o
r
t
o
t
a
l
l
y
d
e
f
i
n
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
boundaries or create or define por
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
y
a
r
d
s
,
o
r
s
e
c
u
r
e
o
r
private areas.
3. REVIEW PROCEDURE
A building permit shall be requir
e
d
f
o
r
a
l
l
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
allowed under these regulations.
P
r
i
o
r
t
o
t
h
e
i
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
o
f
a
building permit, it shall be the r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Development Department to review
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
s
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
with these regulations.
4. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
4.1 SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL USES
This section shall pertain to lots that contain not
more than two (2) dwelling units,
w
h
i
c
h
a
r
e
n
o
t
c
o
v
e
r
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
Section 4.6 and 4.7.
4.1.1 PERMITTED LOCATION OF FEN
C
I
N
G
Except as prohibited by subsection 4.1.3, fencing shall
be allowed along the front setback
l
i
n
e
,
a
n
y
s
i
d
e
l
o
t
l
i
n
e
,
t
h
e
rear lot line, and any area withi
n
t
h
e
y
a
r
d
c
r
e
a
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
l
o
t
lines and setback line described in this
s
u
b
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
02„ 7
th-IA;I)FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 1
4.1.2 REQUIRED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as prohibited by subsection 4.1.3
b
e
l
o
w
,
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
is required on newly developed lots, at
a
l
l
f
r
o
n
t
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
l
i
n
e
s
,
street side property lines, rear pro
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
s
a
b
u
t
t
i
n
g
a
street, and around rear yards. For
t
h
e
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
s
o
f
t
h
i
s
subsection, the word "street" shall in
c
l
u
d
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
streets, publicly maintained alleys, an
d
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
s
s
e
r
v
i
n
g
f
l
a
g
lots, provided said driveway serves at
l
e
a
s
t
t
w
o
l
o
t
s
a
n
d
i
s
a
t
least 20 feet wide.
Fencing shall also be required between t
h
e
u
s
e
s
l
i
s
t
e
d
in section 4.1 and other uses listed in
t
h
e
s
u
b
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
b
e
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
with 4.2.
If a property owner feels extenuating
c
i
r
c
u
m
s
t
a
n
c
e
s
related to a view or a hillside lot
e
x
i
s
t
,
w
h
i
c
h
m
a
k
e
t
h
i
s
required fencing undesirable, the prop
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
m
a
y
a
p
p
e
a
l
i
n
accordance with the procedures set forth
i
n
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
4
.
1
.
3
.
Slopes are generally discouraged. Where possible, a
retaining wall of up to 6' in height
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
t
o
eliminate a slope. Where a property lin
e
c
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
s
t
o
t
h
e
t
o
p
of a slope, fencing shall be installed
a
t
t
h
e
t
o
p
o
f
t
h
e
s
l
o
p
e
.
City staff is authorized and directed t
o
a
l
l
o
w
h
i
g
h
e
r
t
h
a
n
6
o
f
retaining where extenuating circumstance
s
e
x
i
s
t
.
4.1.3 PROHIBITED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as herein provided in this subse
c
t
i
o
n
,
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
is prohibited between the front
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
l
i
n
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
street,between the street side lot li
n
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
,
a
n
d
between the rear lot line and an adj
a
c
e
n
t
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
H
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
should the distance between the street s
i
d
e
l
o
t
l
i
n
e
o
r
t
h
e
r
e
a
r
lot line and their respective adjacent s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
i
s
l
e
s
s
t
h
a
n
f
o
u
r
feet, the fence may be placed against th
e
r
e
a
r
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
i
f
an encroachment permit is first obtained
.
Where fencing is installed between t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
i
d
e
property line and the street side setbac
k
l
i
n
e
,
s
a
i
d
f
e
n
c
e
s
h
a
l
l
not extend any closer than 30 feet to th
e
f
r
o
n
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
.
Fencing that creates a safety proble
m
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
i
t
substantially blocks visibility of veh
i
c
l
e
s
o
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
i
s
prohibited.
nRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 2
If a property owner feels extenuating circ
u
m
s
t
a
n
c
e
s
exist which warrant the placement of a fe
n
c
e
i
n
a
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
location, said property owner- may peti
t
i
o
n
i
n
w
r
i
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
Director of Community Development for appro
v
a
l
,
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
i
n
g
w
h
a
t
these circumstances are. The Director shall
r
e
v
i
e
w
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
,
verify in the field the accuracy of the circu
m
s
t
a
n
c
e
s
,
a
n
d
e
i
t
h
e
r
approve or deny the request. If the requ
e
s
t
i
s
d
e
n
i
e
d
,
t
h
e
matter may be appealed to the Planning Co
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
c
a
n
b
e
further appealed to the City Council. The
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
'
s
d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
shall be final. Normally, an exemption shall
o
n
l
y
b
e
g
r
a
n
t
e
d
f
o
r
fencing along side lot lines. However, wh
e
r
e
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
o
n
m
o
r
e
than 50% of the lots on the same side of th
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
i
n
a
-
b
l
o
c
k
containing fencing in a prohibited loca
t
i
o
n
,
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Development Director shall allow conform
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
fencing.
Special consideration shall be given to histo
r
i
c
h
o
m
e
s
.
4.1.4 MATERIALS
Where fencing is required by subsection 4.1
.
2
,
a
n
d
i
s
facing a street, fencing materials shall be
w
r
o
u
g
h
t
i
r
o
n
t
y
p
e
,
masonry, concrete, brick, or an acceptab
l
e
e
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
o
r
a
combination thereof, excepting that between
d
i
f
f
e
r
i
n
g
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
fencing materials shall be masonry. Gate
s
i
n
t
h
i
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
fencing shall be wrought iron type, chain
l
i
n
k
,
o
r
a
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
acceptable to the Community Development Depar
t
m
e
n
t
.
All other permitted fencing may be of any other
durable material but shall not include barbe
d
w
i
r
e
,
r
a
z
o
r
w
i
r
e
o
r
any other similar fencing or fencing that co
n
t
a
i
n
s
a
n
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
charge that can be touched from outside the
f
e
n
c
e
.
Where a constant fencing type or theme ex
i
s
t
s
i
n
a
housing development, fencing that is replaced
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
with the existing fencing.
Where wood fencing is proposed, the support
p
o
s
t
s
s
h
a
l
l
be galvanized steel, set in concrete.
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 3
Fencing approved by the Department of Community
Development in the area normally prohibite
d
f
r
o
m
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
a
fence shall be of a material specified in th
e
f
i
r
s
t
p
a
r
a
g
r
a
p
h
o
f
this subsection. However, where fencing on
m
o
r
e
t
h
a
n
5
0
%
o
f
t
h
e
lots on the same side of the street in a
b
l
o
c
k
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
n
o
n
conforming materials, the Community Develop
m
e
n
t
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
s
h
a
l
l
also allow fencing of a type existing in tha
t
b
l
o
c
k
e
x
c
e
p
t
t
y
p
e
s
listed in the second paragraph.
Historic homes shall also be given special
consideration.
4.1.5 HEIGHT OF FENCING
Required fencing shall be no less than five
(
5
)
f
e
e
t
i
n
height and no more than (6) feet, as measu
r
e
d
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
h
i
g
h
e
s
t
adjacent grade. All other permitted fencing shall be no mo
r
e
than six (6) feet in height. If a special need exists for a
fence higher than six (6) feet (ie a ten
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
)
,
t
h
e
n
a
variance may be applied for from the Planning
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
.
Where fencing has been approved in an area w
h
e
r
e
i
t
i
s
normally prohibited by these regulations, sa
i
d
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
s
h
a
l
l
n
o
t
exceed 42" in height measured from the adjace
n
t
t
o
p
o
f
c
u
r
b
.
When a reverse corner lot situation exist
s
,
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
along the street side shall not exceed 42"
u
n
l
e
s
s
s
a
i
d
f
e
n
c
e
i
s
set back a minimum of 15 feet from the side l
o
t
l
i
n
e
.
For the purpose of this subsection and
a
l
l
o
t
h
e
r
following sections, the required height s
h
a
l
l
b
e
m
e
t
o
n
b
o
t
h
sides of the wall.
4.1.6 HEDGES
Hedges are permitted on all portions of a l
o
t
.
W
h
e
r
e
fences are prohibited, hedges shall be no hi
g
h
e
r
t
h
a
n
4
2
"
a
b
o
v
e
the top of the adjacent curb. The maximum
h
e
i
g
h
t
o
f
a
h
e
d
g
e
anywhere else on a lot is eight (8) feet.
4.2 MULTIPLE FAMILY
This section shall pertain to lots that co
n
t
a
i
n
m
o
r
e
than two (2) dwelling units.
4.2.1 PERMITTED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as prohibited by subsection 4.2.3, fe
n
c
i
n
g
s
h
a
l
l
be allowed along the front setback line, an
y
s
i
d
e
l
o
t
l
i
n
e
,
t
h
e
rear lot line, and any area within the yar
d
c
r
e
a
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
l
o
t
lines and setback line described in this sub
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 4
4.2.2 REQUIRED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as prohibited by subsection 4.2.
3
b
e
l
o
w
,
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
is required on newly developed lots, at
a
l
l
f
r
o
n
t
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
l
i
n
e
s
,
street side property lines, rear pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
s
a
b
u
t
t
i
n
g
a
street, and around rear yards. Fo
r
t
h
e
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
s
o
f
t
h
i
s
subsection, the word "street" shall i
n
c
l
u
d
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
streets, publicly maintained alleys, a
n
d
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
s
s
e
r
v
i
n
g
f
l
a
g
lots, provided said driveway serves at
l
e
a
s
t
t
w
o
l
o
t
s
a
n
d
i
s
a
t
least 20 feet wide. Fencing is not requ
i
r
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
f
r
o
n
t
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
line as it intersects a driveway to a pa
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
.
Fencing shall also be required between
t
h
e
u
s
e
s
l
i
s
t
e
d
in section 4.1 and other uses list
e
d
b
e
l
o
w
b
e
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
subsection 4.3 and the uses to which th
i
s
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
p
e
r
t
a
i
n
s
.
Slopes are generally discouraged. Where possible, a
retaining wall of up to 6' in height
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
t
o
eliminate a slope. Where a property l
i
n
e
c
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
s
t
o
t
h
e
t
o
p
of a slope, fencing shall be installe
d
a
t
t
h
e
t
o
p
o
f
t
h
e
s
l
o
p
e
.
City staff is authorized and directed
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
h
i
g
h
e
r
t
h
a
n
6
'
o
f
retaining where extenuating circumstance
s
e
x
i
s
t
.
4.2.3 PROHIBITED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as herein provided in this subs
e
c
t
i
o
n
,
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
is prohibited between the front
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
l
i
n
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
street,between the street side lot
l
i
n
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
,
a
n
d
between the rear lot line and an -adjacent street. However,
should the distance between the street
s
i
d
e
l
o
t
l
i
n
e
o
r
t
h
e
r
e
a
r
lot line and their respective adjacent
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
i
s
l
e
s
s
t
h
a
n
f
o
u
r
feet, the fence may be placed against t
h
e
r
e
a
r
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
i
f
an encroachment permit is first obtaine
d
.
Where fencing is installed between
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
i
d
e
property line and the street side setb
a
c
k
l
i
n
e
,
s
a
i
d
f
e
n
c
e
s
h
a
l
l
not extend any closer than 30 feet to t
h
e
f
r
o
n
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
.
Fencing that creates a safety prob
l
e
m
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
i
t
substantially blocks visibility of ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
o
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
i
s
prohibited.
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 5
If a property owner feels extenuating circu
m
s
t
a
n
c
e
s
exist which warrant the placement of a fen
c
e
i
n
a
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
location, said property owner may petiti
o
n
i
n
w
r
i
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
Director of Community Development for approv
a
l
,
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
i
n
g
w
h
a
t
these circumstances are. The Director shall r
e
v
i
e
w
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
,
verify in the field the accuracy of the circum
s
t
a
n
c
e
s
,
a
n
d
e
i
t
h
e
r
approve or deny the request. If the reque
s
t
i
s
d
e
n
i
e
d
,
t
h
e
matter may be appealed to the Planning Com
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
c
a
n
b
e
further appealed to the City Council. The C
o
u
n
c
i
l
'
s
d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
shall be final. Normally, an exemption shall
o
n
l
y
b
e
g
r
a
n
t
e
d
f
o
r
fencing along side lot lines.
4.2.4 MATERIALS
Where fencing is required by subsection 4.2.2
,
a
n
d
i
s
visible from the street, fencing materials sha
l
l
b
e
w
r
o
u
g
h
t
i
r
o
n
type, masonry, concrete, brick, or an acceptab
l
e
e
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
o
r
a
combination thereof, excepting that betw
e
e
n
u
s
e
s
,
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
materials shall be masonry. Gates in this req
u
i
r
e
d
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
s
h
a
l
l
be wrought iron type, chain link, or a materia
l
a
c
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
t
o
t
h
e
Community Development Director.
All other permitted fencing may be of any other
durable material but shall not include barbed
w
i
r
e
,
r
a
z
o
r
w
i
r
e
o
r
any other similar fencing or fencing that con
t
a
i
n
s
a
n
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
charge that can be touched from outside the fe
n
c
e
.
Where wood fencing is proposed, the support po
s
t
s
s
h
a
l
l
be galvanized steel, set in concrete.
Fencing approved by the Director of Community
Development or the City Council in the area n
o
r
m
a
l
l
y
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
e
d
from containing a fence shall be of a materia
l
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
first paragraph of this subsection.
4.2.5 HEIGHT OF FENCING
Required fencing shall be no less than five (5
)
f
e
e
t
i
n
height and no more than (6) feet. All other
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
shall be no more than six (6) feet in height
.
A
l
l
f
e
n
c
e
h
e
i
g
h
t
s
shall be measured from the highest adjacent gr
a
d
e
.
Where the Director of Community Development or
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Council has approved fencing in an area wh
e
r
e
i
t
i
s
n
o
r
m
a
l
l
y
prohibited by these regulations, said fenci
n
g
s
h
a
l
l
n
o
t
e
x
c
e
e
d
42" in height measured from the adjacent top
o
f
c
u
r
b
.
When a reverse corner lot situation exists,
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
along the street side shall not exceed 42" unless said fence is
set back a minimum of 15 feet from the side lot
l
i
n
e
.
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 6
4.2.6 HEDGES
Hedges are permitted on all portions of a lot
.
W
h
e
r
e
fences are prohibited, hedges shall be no highe
r
t
h
a
n
4
2
"
a
b
o
v
e
the top of the adjacent curb. The maximum he
i
g
h
t
o
f
a
h
e
d
g
e
anywhere else on a lot is eight (8) feet.
4.3 COMMERCIAL USE
This section shall pertain to lots that contai
n
u
s
e
s
allowed in the C-1 and C-2 zones.
4.3.1 PERMITTED LOCATION OF FENCING
Except as prohibited below, fencing shall o
n
l
y
b
e
allowed along an interior side lot line and
a
r
e
a
r
l
o
t
l
i
n
e
.
Other fencing may be permitted behind the front
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
l
i
n
e
u
p
o
n
a petition in accordance with Section 4.1.3.
4.3.2 REQUIRED LOCATION
Except when prohibited by 4.3.3 fencing is req
u
i
r
e
d
o
n
all newly developed lots along interior side l
o
t
l
i
n
e
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
rear lot line.
Slopes are generally discouraged. Where possible, a
retaining wall of up to 6' in height shall b
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
t
o
eliminate a slope. Where a property line corre
s
p
o
n
d
s
t
o
t
h
e
t
o
p
of a slope, fencing shall be installed at the
t
o
p
o
f
t
h
e
s
l
o
p
e
.
City staff is authorized and directed to allow
h
i
g
h
e
r
t
h
a
n
6
'
o
f
retaining where extenuating circumstances exist
.
4.3.3 PROHIBITED
Fencing is prohibited in all areas where it
i
s
n
o
t
permitted by Section 4.3.1.
4.3.4. MATERIALS
L cc. Cc
ccc.....
When constructed, perimeter fencing shall b
e
s
o
l
i
d
masonry, concrete, or similar material.
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 7
4.3.5 HEIGHT
The height of fencing between commer
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
n
d
residential uses shall be six feet exce
p
t
t
h
e
2
0
'
c
l
o
s
e
s
t
t
o
a
n
d
perpendicular to a street shall be no mo
r
e
t
h
a
n
4
2
"
h
i
g
h
.
All other fencing for a commercial use sh
a
l
l
n
o
t
e
x
c
e
e
d
6' in height, unless the Planning Commis
s
i
o
n
,
b
y
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
U
s
e
Permit, has approved a higher fence for s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
r
e
a
s
o
n
s
.
--
4.3.6 HEDGES
Hedges associated with commercial uses s
h
a
l
l
n
o
t
e
x
c
e
e
d
42" in height.
4.4 INDUSTRIAL USE
4.4.1 PERMITTED LOCATION
Except as otherwise prohibited, fencing
m
a
y
b
e
allowed behind front or streetside setba
c
k
l
i
n
e
s
.
4.4.2 REQUIRED LOCATION OF FENCING
Fencing is not required unless there is o
u
t
s
i
d
e
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
of materials or an attractive nuisance o
n
a
l
o
t
.
Slopes are generally discouraged. Wher
e
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
,
a
retaining wall of up to 6' in height s
h
a
l
l
b
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
t
o
eliminate a slope. Where a property lin
e
c
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
s
t
o
t
h
e
t
o
p
of a slope, fencing shall be installed
a
t
t
h
e
t
o
p
o
f
t
h
e
s
l
o
p
e
.
City staff is authorized and directed to
a
l
l
o
w
h
i
g
h
e
r
t
h
a
n
6
'
o
f
retaining where extenuating circumstance
s
e
x
i
s
t
.
4.4.3 PROHIBITED LOCATION
Fencing is prohibited within any setback
a
r
e
a
4.4.4 MATERIALS
When fencing is installed, it shall be c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
o
f
masonry, wrought iron type, chain
l
i
n
k
,
o
r
a
n
a
c
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
equivalent.
The Community Development Director shall
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
,
b
y
the nature of the business, whether scre
e
n
i
n
g
i
s
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
.
S
u
c
h
determination may be appealed to the Plan
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
.
nRAPT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 8
4.4.5 HEIGHT OF FENCING
Fencing facing a street, shall be no mo
r
e
t
h
a
n
s
i
x
(
6
)
feet in height. Other fencing shall not
e
x
c
e
e
d
e
i
g
h
t
(
8
)
f
e
e
t
i
n
height.
If a special need exists for a fence hi
g
h
e
r
t
h
a
n
t
h
a
t
specified above, then a variance may b
e
a
p
p
l
i
e
d
f
o
r
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
Planning Commission.
Generally, outside storage shall not exc
e
e
d
t
h
e
h
e
i
g
h
t
of the fence.
4.4.6 HEDGES
Hedges shall be considered as fences fo
r
t
h
e
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
s
of this subsection.
4.5 MOB ILEHOMES
4.5.1 MOBILEHOME PARKS
Mobilehome parks shall have be separated
f
r
o
m
d
i
f
f
e
r
i
n
g
land uses by a six (6) foot masonry wall.
Street frontages shall have a six foo
t
c
o
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
decorative wall and wrought iron type
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
,
w
h
i
c
h
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
approved by the Planning Commission
w
h
e
n
i
t
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
s
t
h
e
Conditional Use Permit application.
4.5.2 MOBILEHOME SUBDIVISIONS
Mobilehome subdivisions or mobilehome
s
o
n
a
s
i
n
g
l
e
family lot shall meet the requirements of
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
1
.
1
a
b
o
v
e
.
Slopes are generally discouraged. Whe
r
e
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
,
a
retaining wall of up to 6' in height
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
t
o
eliminate a slope. Where a property lin
e
c
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
s
t
o
t
h
e
t
o
p
of a slope, fencing shall be installed
a
t
t
h
e
t
o
p
o
f
t
h
e
s
l
o
p
e
.
City staff is authorized and directed to
a
l
l
o
w
h
i
g
h
e
r
t
h
a
n
6
'
o
f
retaining where extenuating circumstance
s
e
x
i
s
t
.
4.6 AGRICULTURAL
4.6.1 DEFINITIONS
Agricultural Use--Any use listed in the
Z
o
n
i
n
g
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
w
h
i
c
h
permits the keeping of animals.
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 9
Small agricultural use-a use on less than
o
n
e
n
e
t
a
c
r
e
.
Large agricultural use-a use on one or mor
e
n
e
t
a
c
r
e
s
.
4.6.2 SMALL AGRICULTURAL USES
Land which has a small agricultural use a
n
d
o
n
e
o
r
m
o
r
e
dwelling units shall comply with Section
4
.
1
a
b
o
v
e
.
Slopes are generally discouraged. Where possible, a
retaining wall of up to 6' in height s
h
a
l
l
b
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
t
o
eliminate a slope. Where a property line
c
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
s
t
o
t
h
e
t
o
p
of a slope, fencing shall be installed a
t
t
h
e
t
o
p
o
f
t
h
e
s
l
o
p
e
.
City staff is authorized and directed to
a
l
l
o
w
h
i
g
h
e
r
t
h
a
n
6
'
o
f
retaining where extenuating circumstances
e
x
i
s
t
.
4.6.3 LARGE AGRICULTURAL USES
All other agricultural uses not covered b
y
s
u
b
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
4.6.2 have no specific fencing requiremen
t
s
e
x
c
e
p
t
t
h
a
t
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
shall not create a traffic hazard.
4.7 OTHER USES
All other uses not previously listed in these
regulations shall have their fencing re
v
i
e
w
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Commission if a public hearing is requir
e
d
o
r
b
y
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Development Director if no public hearing
i
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
Examples of uses not specifically mentio
n
e
d
h
e
r
e
i
n
a
r
e
Planned Unit Developments, Planned Com
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
,
recreational facilities,schools, and flood
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
a
s
i
n
s
.
5. NON-CONFORMITIES
Existing fencing not conforming to these
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
shall be made to conform if said fencin
g
i
s
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
d
f
o
r
a
n
y
reason or if there is a substantial change
i
n
u
s
e
,
e
x
c
e
p
t
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
damaged fencing may be replaced in kind
i
f
t
h
e
d
a
m
a
g
e
i
s
l
e
s
s
than 50% of the fence length.
6. MAINTENANCE
All fencing shall be maintained in a reasonably
attractive condition, free of graffiti, dry rot, etc. No fence
shall have any hazardous elements enda
n
g
e
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
h
e
a
l
t
h
o
r
welfare of any member of the public. Any
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
n
o
t
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
in accordance with this section shall
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
nuisance.
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 10
The City Council shall hold a hearing to m
a
k
e
t
h
e
f
i
n
a
l
determination of a public nuisance and s
h
a
l
l
i
s
s
u
e
a
n
o
r
d
e
r
o
f
action to be taken. If the property own
e
r
f
a
i
l
s
t
o
c
o
m
p
l
y
w
i
t
h
the order, the City or its agent may enter
o
n
t
o
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
for the purposes of eliminating the publ
i
c
n
u
i
s
a
n
c
e
.
A
n
y
c
o
s
t
s
to the City shall be assessed as a lien on
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
7. PENALTY
Any person violating these regulations sh
a
l
l
b
e
g
u
i
l
t
y
of an infraction, punishable by a fine of
$
1
0
0
.
0
0
f
o
r
e
a
c
h
d
a
y
o
f
violation. Any person violating these reg
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
s
e
c
o
n
d
t
i
m
e
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and sh
a
l
l
b
e
p
u
n
i
s
h
a
b
l
e
b
y
a
fine of $500.00 per day for each day of
v
i
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
/
o
r
u
p
t
o
thirty (30) days in jail.
DRAFT FENCE REGULATIONS PAGE 11
MEMO
TO: Ross S. Nammar, City Manager
FROM: Henry T. Garcia, Asst. City Manager
SUBJ: Infoimal Bid
Restriping of City Streets
DATE: 10-11-89
Sealed bids for restriping the City streets at various
locations throughout the City were opened on October 11,
1989.
Six (6) pavement marking companies were solicited to
participate in the bidding process. The following companies
submitted bids:
1. Interstate Striping Co. $37,389.30
2. Arrow Straight Striping $27,604.00
Staff has had an opportunity to verify references with
the City of La Mesa and the City of Temple City regarding
the quality and capability of Arrow Straight to satisfactorily
complete the aforementioned project for the City of San
Jacinto. Staff is pleased to report both references were
satisfied with the work completed by Arrow Straight.
Therefore, Staff respectfully recommends the City Manager
award the bid for restriping to Arrow Straight in the amount
of $27,604.00 and reject all other bids.
Upon approval of the bid, Staff anticipates Arrow Straight
will begin work within seven (7) working days. Staff
believes the total project can be completed within ten
(10) working days.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate
to ask.
nr
AGENDA
ORDINANCE NO. 882
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN JACINTO CONCERNING FIRE LANES AND
PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION
THEREOF
The City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California does
hereby ordain as follows:
Section 1: Ordinance No. 764 is hereby amended as herein
after set forth:
Section 2: The Fire Chief is hereby given the authority
to require areas to be cleared of obstructions and maintained
as Fire Lanes at any location where he has determined that the
circumstances are such that without such Fire Lanes the entry
by and use of fire apparatus for fire suppression, emergency
medical or rescue purposes would be obstructed or otherwise ren-
dered unduly difficult.
Section 3: Appropriate markings or signs of a type specified
by the Fire Chief, in accordance with the California Vehicle
Code, shall be placed by the owner of the land in those locations
approved by the Fire Chief. Signs must be mounted on the face
of a building, or on a post, in plain view at all entrances.
Spacing of signs shall be no less than fifty feet (50') between
signs.
Section 4: All curbing along fire lanes shall be painted
red on all faces (horizontal, vertical, etc.). If no curbs are
provided, the area of the fire lane shall be marked with a four
inch (4") red stripe the length of the fire lane with the words
FIRE LANE written in a contrasting color and clearly visible
from a vehicle.
Section 5: No person shall stop or park a vehicle within,
or otherwise obstructed according to the California Vehicle Code
22500.1 or any area designated as a Fire Lane by the Fire Chief.
Section 6: For the purpose of regulating and as a deterrent
to the abuse of this Ordinance, a fee has been prescribed by
resolution of the City Council for such violations as shall be
charged. The amount of such fee shall be indicated on the notice
issued for violation of this Ordinance. The owner or operator
to whom such a notice has been given shall, within ten (10) days
from the date of the notice, pay to the Finance Director of the
City such amount as indicated on the notice. In the event payment
is not made within such ten (10) day period, proceedings shall
be commenced in compliance with the procedures set forth in
Section 41102 of the Vehicle Code of the State of California
and any applicable State of California law for institution of
proceedings in the Municipal Court of the Mt. San Jacinto
Judicial District. The City Council may by resolution establish
an additional fee or fees for any payment made to the Finance
Director after the ten day period following initial notice of
violation; however, any payment to the City shall not relieve
such person from any responsibility or liability to respond to
any proceedings instituted by the Municipal Court.
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1 Section 7: No person shall violate any provisions or fail
to comply with any of the requirements of this Ordinance. Any
2 person who shall violate any of the provisions of this Ordinance
shall be guilty of an infraction. Any person convicted of an
3 infraction under the provisions of this Ordinance unless pro-
vision is otherwise made in this Ordinance shall be punished
4 upon a first conviction by a fine not exceeding one hundred
dollars ($100.00), and for a second conviction of a fine not
5 exceeding two hundred dollars ($200.00), and for a third or any
subsequent conviction within a one (1) year period by a fine
6 not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500.00).
7 Each such person is guilty of a separate offense for each and
every day during any portion of which any violation of any pro-
8 vision of the Ordinance is committed, continued or permitted
by such person and shall be punished accordingly.
9
The imposition of one penalty for any violation shall not excuse
10 the violation or permit it to continue; and all such persons
shall be required to correct or remedy such violations or defects
11 within a reasonable time; and when not otherwise specified, each
ten days that prohibited conditions are maintained shall con-
12 stitute a separate offense.
13 The application of the above penalty shall not be held to prevent
the enforced removal of prohibited conditions.
Section 8: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
hereof and cause this Ordinance to be published in the Hemet
News, a newspaper of general circulation printed and published
in the City of San Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of
California.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council on
October 17, 1989.
MOVED, PASSED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City
Council duly held on , 1989.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
AGENDA
WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO CITY CLERK
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
P. 0. Box 489
San Jacinto, CA 92383
IC
ITV C3 F- S IN 3 cINUTD
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given that pursuant to authorization
granted October 17, 1989, by the City Council of the City of
San Jacinto, a California Municipality as owner, for the
following work:
Tahquitz & Wateka Water Improvement Project 88-89-3 was
duly completed by Hefley Bros. Corp. on the 22nd day of
September 1999 and work duly accepted by minute action at a
regular meeting of the City Council on October 17, 1989.
Full completion and acceptance of the above-named work
is hereby acknowledged.
City of San Jacinto
By
Ross S. Nammar
City Manager
I verify that I am a duly
authorized agent of the
San Jacinto City Council
By
Ross S. Nammar
City Manager
Original: City Clerk
Copy: Water Department
AGENDA
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
September 27, 1989
Improvement Agreement
Donald and Susan Ziegler
The Zieglers, located at 148 Midway, proposed to build a room
addition. This improvement created the necessity to install curb,
gutter, and sidewalk in front of their house. There is currently
none of these improvements anywhere on West Midway. Therefore, it
is not logical to impose these requirements on the Zieglers. The
proper time would be when other lots on Midway also install their
improvements.
Staff respectfully requests the Council authorize the Mayor to
execute the agreement and direct it to be recorded with the County
Recorder's office.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:lr
AGREEMENT
(RE: Curbs, Gutters, Sidewalks, Paving & Other Public
Improvements)
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this
day of 1989, by and between Donald
W. Zeigler and Susan J. Zeigler, husband and wife hereinafter
referred to as First Parties, and the City of San Jacinto,
California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as
"CITY".
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, First Parties are the present owners of the
hereinafter described real property, and;
WHEREAS, Ordinances of said "CITY" require curbs,
gutters, sidewalk, and paving to be installed by the property
owner, and;
WHEREAS, the present owners do not desire at this time
to install curbs, gutters, sidewalks;
WHEREAS, the "CITY" does presently find that the
installation of the required improvements cited above at this
time would be impractical and said "CITY" is willing to waive
the requirements of said improvements at this time, but said
"CITY" will require said installations to be made by the said
property owners or their successors or assigns at some future
date as may be determined by the "CITY".
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the
parties hereto as follows:
1. That the installation of the improvements,
Including the installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paving
and other improvements as may be required by said "CITY", be
deferred from the date of this agreement, until improvements are
made contiguous to the property of the First Party in which case
the required Public Improvements shall be immediately installed.
2. That when said "CITY" deems that the installation
of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, installation of standard roadway
between the lip of the new gutter and edge of existing pavement,
or the centerline of the street, and other public improvements
are necessary, the "CITY" shall give written notice to the
owners of said real property to make said improvements, or pay
their fair share of the improvements within ninety (90) days
from the date of the written notice given to the property owners
requiring that said installations or payment be made.
3. City will not request the public improvements to
be installed until one or more adjacent properties also is
required to install similar public improvements.
4. That in the event that the said property owners
fail or refuse to make the required public and/or private
improvements or pay the required cost of improvements within the
time allotted, the "CITY" shall have the option of bringing such
legal action as the law may afford to enforce the installation
of said public improvements or the "CITY" at its sole option may
make said improvements and may either enforce the collection of
said costs
2
3
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
OFFiC9AL SEAL
LILLIAN HARTMAN
NOTAP'r PUBUC CALIFGANiA
'e Rk:itiE COUNTY
MNC.4'.41.0=1 ,CEN
June 29, Ino z
of said public improvements by such legal actions, together with
reasonable attorney's fees and costs, or may cause said costs of
said improvements to be made a lien against the real property as
herein described.
5. That the real property referred to herein is all
that real property located in the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, and more particularly described
as Exhibit "A".
6. It is understood and agreed by the parties that this
agreement shall be recorded with the County of Riverside, and
shall be binding upon the heirs, transferees, successors and
assigns of the parties hereto. Time is declared the essence of
this agreement and this contract shall be deemed to have been
executed and to be performed in the County of Riverside, State of
California.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
agreement as of the day and year first written above.
13
14
15
16
17 ATTEST:
18
19 Deputy City Clerk
20
21
22
23
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
By
Mayor, City ofSan Jacinto
CAT. NO. NN00627
TO 1944 CA (9-84)
(Individual)
ATTACHED TO AGREEMENT
04- TICOR TITLE INSURANCE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF Riverside
On May 17, 1989 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for
Donald W. Zeigler and Susan J. Zeigler * * said State, personally appeared
1
2
3
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
V9V9.r)APY ANYW ribMe or
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be
the person S whose name s a re subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowledged that they exe-
cuted the same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
CTS77/
Ac1 193 .3 4,1,4 , thl) No I NIO, ok, a6014-. 13-25 -2, 13-25 -3 439-16 -2 'J2/32 7-30-52 T C. A. 913/ 010 - 093 , 010-091 —MIDWAY di. Yr POF?. Po. SAN JACINTO VIEJO 76 • 55' Sr 0000 AVE 0-P 0 0 1 n?N. 7 1 ci -...'„ ' 0 1 6 ! o 0 331 / 79 zc, a 6,/5 4c z 0 af-1-1 It, 11 :7,74 11/77' ,39 ,Id Zoo 0 SAN JACINTO LAW ASSN /118 8/357 SD REC080 of SURVEY 42/64 o 4 Orr. 539p 11' 1, 4,7 (77) ASSESSOR'S ,'AP 96 -09 PG 16 RIVERSIDE COUNT Y, CALIF
AG E;,1
MEMO
TO: Ross S. Nammar, City Manager
FROM: Henry Garcia, Asst. City Manager
SUBJ: Clerk Typist Position
DATE: 10-13-89
Attached to this memorandum is a Leave of Absence request
from Clerk Typist, Kim Perry, dated 10-4-89, and a memor-
andum addressed to this writer from the Public Works Super-
intendent, dated 10-10-89.
After reviewing both memorandums, and discussing the
situation at the City Yard with both Superintendents, Staff
respectfully recommends the City Manager fill the Clerk
Typist position immediately. By way of background infor-
mation, Staff has reassigned an existing Clerk Typist from
Community Development to the City Yard. The reassignment
of a Clerk Typist has created an excessive burden on the
Community Development Department which desperately needs
the additional clerical support.
In light of the aforementioned, Staff is prepared at this
time to hire a clerk typist, pending your approval.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Respectfully submitted,
Henry Garcia
nr
MEMO
TO: Henry Garcia, Asst. City Manager
FROM: Richard Vryheid, Public Works Superintendent
SUBJ: Vacancy at Corporate Yard
DATE: 10-10-89
This memo is written to address the vacant Clerk Typist
position at the Corporate Yard.
As you know, Kim Perry is taking a leave-of-absence after
her vacation and sick time are depleted, due to surgery and
recovery time. This leaves the Corporate Yard with a serious
problem. We have no one to take messages, answer phone calls,
dispatch crews and do filing, along with the completion of
gas logs and all necessary correspondence relating to both
Public Works and the Water Department.
At this time, I would like to request the Clerk Typist
position be filled from any existing eligibility list
applicable to this position.
nr
SIGNED
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
905 Industrial Way
San Jacinto, CA 92383
TO: Ross Nammar, City Manager
FROM: Kim Perry
DATE: October 4, 1989
SUBJ: Leave of Absence
I am requesting a Leave of Absence Without Pay for a period
of thirty (30) days effective October 23, 1989 through
November 17, 1989.
I am required to have surgery on my right hand for Carpal
Tunnel Syndrom on October 9, 1989 with a recovery period
of four to -six weeks. My total hours on the books will
cover the period from October 10, 1989 through 3 2/3 hours
on the 20th of October.
If my recovery goes well, it may be only four weeks and I
would be able to return to work the week of November 6th.
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
October 13, 1989
Environmental Impact Assessment and
Tentative Parcel Map 25021
APPLICANT: GGP INVESTMENTS
232 W. Napa Street
Sonoma, Ca. 95476
Attached for your use and information is the staff report for
Tentative Parcel Map 25021 a two lot subdivision next to the High
School on Idyllwild Drive.
The Planning Commission has recommended the approval of
Resolution RDA-89-7.
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:ga
STAFF REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
October 13, 1989
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25021
APPLICANT: GGP INVESTMENTS
232 W. Napa Street
Sonoma, Ca. 95476
DESCRIPTION
A proposal to divide approximately 4.77 acres into two lots
generally located south of Idyllwild Drive, east of Tiger Lane,
north of Ramona Boulevard, and east of State Street.
CURRENT ZONING
CURRENT GENERAL PLAN
CURRENT USES
EXISTING CIRCULATION
ELEMENT
EXHIBIT "A"
EXHIBIT "B"
EXHIBIT "C"
EXHIBIT "D"
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
On May 4, 1989 the Planning Commission reviewed Conditional Use
Permit 7-89, a proposal to construct a 38 unit apartment complex.
Attached and incorporated into this report is the Environmental
Analysis for CUP 7-89 for your review.
DISCUSSION
The proposal is to divide approximately 4.77 acres into two
multi-family residential lots.
The current zoning is R-3, Multi-family residential.
The surrounding zoning is C-2 (general commercial) to the west
and south, R-1 (single family residential) and R-2 (two-family
residential) to the north, and the high school to the east.
The current General Plan is High Density Residential.
Tentative Parcel Map 25021 is in substantial compliance with the
City's Subdivision Ordinance 673 and the Subdivision Map Act.
Idyllwild Drive is designated as an 88' secondary highway.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends the approval of Tentative
Parcel Map 25021 subject to findings of fact and conditions of
approval.
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The subject site is not in a known "A" or "B" Fl
o
o
d
Z
o
n
e
n
o
r
within known special seismic study zone.
2. Utilities are available to the site but main line
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
s
will be required to bring water and sewer to the
s
i
t
e
.
3. Idyllwild Drive is designated as an 88' secondary
h
i
g
h
w
a
y
.
4. Tentative Parcel Map 25021 is in substantial com
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
the City's Subdivision Ordinance 673 and the Sub
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
M
a
p
Act.
5. Tentative Parcel Map 25021 is within the r
a
n
g
e
o
f
t
h
e
Stephen's Kangaroo Rat habitat.
6. The natural grade and drainage is towards the no
r
t
h
.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. A fourteen foot dedication shall be required along Idyl
l
w
i
l
d
Drive.
2. Construct a 6.5 foot monolithic sidewalk, 8 inch curb face
and 24 inch gutter and matching street paving. Curbs
a
n
d
gutters shall be 32' from center line of Idyllwild Drive.
3. Idyllwild Drive may be required to be reconstructed
t
o
centerline.
4. Storm drain fees shall be paid prior to recordation of
t
h
e
final map.
5. Install water and sewer improvements in Idyllwild D
r
i
v
e
prior to placing any new pavement.
EXHIBIT "A"
TT 25021
CURRENT ZONING
EXHIBIT "B"
IT 25021
CURRENT GENERAL PLAN
Vacant
/
Vacant ///
//
Vacant
San Jacinto
High School
,
,
I I
EXHIBIT "C"
IT 25021
CURRENT USE
EXHIBIT "D"
TT 25021
EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT
STAFF REPORT
TO: Chairman Hixson and Members of the Planning Commission
DATE: May 4, 1989
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 7-89
APPLICANT: San Jacinto Village Apartments
232 West Napa Street
Sonoma, CA 95476
DESCRIPTION
A request for a conditional use permit to construct a
thirty-eight (38) unit apartment complex located on the
south side of Idyllwild Drive, adjacent to the San Jacinto
High School.
CURRENT ZONING EXHIBIT A
Project site: R-3, multifamily residential
Surrounding: C-2, general commercial
R-2, multifamily residential
CURRENT GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT B
Subject site: Medium density residential
Surrounding: General commercial
Medium density residential
Public/institutional
CURRENT USES EXHIBIT C
Subject site: Vacant land
Surrounding: San Jacinto High School
Vacant land
GTE switch station
EXISTING CIRCULATION
Idyllwild Drive -
ELEMENT 88' secondary highway
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The subject site is located within a "B" Flood Zone.
Hydrology report shall be submitted to the City to establish
what local drainage mitigation will be needed retain water
run off created by the project.
CUP-7-89 PAGE NO. 1
Also, the developer shall contribute to the San Jacinto
Master Drainage Plan through fees imposed by the City.
There are no known special seismic study zones across the
property, however, there is a special seismic study zone
approximately one mile from the subject site.
All utilities, except sewer, are available to the subject
site. Some main line extensions and system improvements will
be required. The nearest sewer main is located north of the
Ramona Expressway at Eagle Road.
The San Jacinto Valley has been historically known to be in
the range of for the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. The State of
California Department of Fish and Game noted in their letter
dated July 20, 1988, that the subject site is unlikely to
support the kangaroo rat.
The environmental review identified the following eleven
impacts the project has on the City and its services.
They are:
[1] Local and regional drainage
[2] Local roadways and intersections
[3] Parks
[4] Public safety structures and equipment
[5] Public safety staffing
[6] Air quality
[7] Noise
[8] Regional transportation construction and
maintenance
[9] Increased street repair and street cleaning and
support equipment
[10] School impact
[11] Need for libraries, youth centers, senior centers,
and other public facilities
These impacts must be discussed in greater detail in order
to understand their full implications.
Local drainage is that water that is generated by run off
and is carried to the regional system via the streets,
ditches, small open drainage channels, and storm sewers
usually sized less than 36" or not a part of the regional
master plan. Normally, the developer is responsible for all
the cost of improvement for local drainage.
The Master Drainage Plan reveals a 42" diameter storm drain
line (line H) in Idyllwild Drive which will be installed at
a future date.
In the meantime, the developer must provide a hydrologic
CUP-7-89 PAGE NO. 2
study to determine the amount of run off generation, and the
impacts of this water on downstream properties. The result
of this study will determine the action to be taken on local
drainage issues. It could include on site retention basins.
Regional drainage is the cumulative impact of local run off.
In San Jacinto, this translates into the implementation of
the Regional Master Drainage Plan. A new analysis of this
plan is scheduled by Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District in mid 1989. The impacts of
this tract can only be met by participating financially in
the construction. This correlates into a current fee of
$3700.00 per gross acre mitigation fee, to be paid prior to
the issuance of permits. The fee in effect at the time or
recordation will be the basis.
Local roadways and intersection are of course, impacted by
additional traffic. A multifamily apartment complex
generally averages between 6 and 8 trips per day. Added
traffic creates needs for controlled intersections. The
major intersections closest to a development are the one
impacted most by the traffic. As other roadway options are
available, the impacts geometrically reduce. However, the
cumulative impact of all development together may create a
need for signalization at intersections further away from
the development first.
Staff has prepared a plan that estimates where traffic
signal ultimately may be placed. Funds to construct those
intersections are extracted from developments as the
assumption is the signal is not needed if further
development did not occur.
CUP 7-89 will generate 228-304 trips per day. The streets
receiving the greatest amount of this traffic will be
Idyllwild Drive and State Street. The intersection of
Idyllwild Drive and State Street is expected to be impacted
the most. The mitigation fee for CUP 7-89 is currently
$100.00 per unit, to be paid at the time of permit issuance.
Parks are impacted by residential development. The General
Plan lists a need of 3 acres of public park per 1000 people.
The Subdivision Map Act allows the collection of park fees
or the requirement to dedicate and improve a park. The
ideal park size for a neighborhood park is somewhere between
5 and seven acres, which translates into serving 1600-2300
people. The average occupancy rate per unit in San Jacinto
is about 2.53. The new single family subdivision are
suspected to be closer to 3.0. Therefore, for every 500-700
dwelling units, there should be at least neighborhood park.
CUP-7-89 PAGE NO.
CUP 7-89 consists of 38 units, which does not generate a
need for a park by itself. The impacts of the development
on parks will be the payment of park fees which will be used
to create the parks or to rehabilitate existing parks.
As more development occurs, it naturally creates a need to
expand public safety services. The type of development
determines the impact on public services. Typically, police
service is impacted to a greater extent than fire service,
which is not to minimize fire service impacts. For example,
a family apartment project creates more calls for police
service than a single family subdivision. This can create
an immediate need for an increase in staffing, depending on
the size of the project.
The increase in number of units creates more potential for
fire calls but usually doesn't necessitate the need for
increased personnel. However, a senior citizen project will
definitely create more calls for fire service than a family
development. A larger measure of impact on fire service is
response time.
In any case, more personnel creates a direct need to have
equipment for that personnel. The staffing level San
Jacinto is attempting to maintain is 2.5 non supervisorial
police per 1000 people. The average cost of police
personnel and equipment in 1988 was approximately 37.00 per
person per year, for non-supervisorial personnel. By
extension, new development also creates a need to house
additional personnel and equipment. Funding sources for the
entire police budget, such as property taxes and sales tax
are also the funding sources for general governmental
services. In San Jacinto, the budget for the Police
Department exceeds these revenue sources.
The ultimate goal of the San Jacinto Fire Department is to
be able to respond to all calls within 5 minutes. As
development occurs, further from the City core, the response
time drops. The City currently has one fire station in the
center of town. A second fire station is due to be
constructed in the next year. A third potential site is
being acquired for future construction. The cost of
construction is currently about $250,000.00. A fire engine
costs $225,000.00 to purchase and equip. Staffing for a
fire station also runs approximately $250,000.00 per year.
The traditional funding sources for fire services are
identical to those for police service.
CUP 7-89 will generate between 96 to 152 people. This
development then will produce a demand for 0.18 to 0.28 new
police personnel. To offset the costs of the impacts on
public safety the developer of CUP 7-89 shall pay an
CUP-7-89 PAGE NO. 4
acceptable mitigation fee for impacts on capital equipment
at the police station.
CUP 7-89 is within the ideal response goals of the Fire
Department and will fall in the coverage of Fire Station #1.
The developer shall pay an acceptable fire mitigation fee
for capital equipment at Station #2.
All development that induces motor vehicle usage has a
negative impact on the environment. A single project
creates few problems. The cumulative impacts of all
development within a region, including smoke stack
discharge, auto emission, length of drive, location of
business in the region, and housing availability and cost
all influence the air quality. The main polluter is the
motor vehicle idling in traffic. Currently, most commerce
is located in Orange, Los Angeles, and parts of Riverside,
and San Bernardino Counties. Most of the affordable housing
is located in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties.
Therefore, the migration of workers in the morning is
westerly and vice versa in the P.M. In this valley two
things can be done to improve air quality. The most
immediate method is to participate and encourage car
pooling. The other, longer range solution is to move
commerce to the east.
CUP 7-89 will generate a number of commuters to the west.
The initial phase of a local air quality management plan is
to provide secure car pooling parking lots, and the second
phase is to link car poolers.
The most efficient short term means to establish this
program is the payment of a mitigation fee. The mitigation
fee for this program is $90.00 per unit.
There are two regional roads that pass through San Jacinto,
Ramona Expressway and Sanderson Avenue. They are regional
because they are used to transport people efficiently around
the cities to destinations outside the valley. Neither of
these streets are constructed to their ultimate and the
existing roadways for each are in need of repair. While it
may not be appropriate to expect a development contiguous to
a regional roadway to finance total construction of the
roadway, it is fair to expect that development to pay its
fair share. There is approximately $4,686,400.00 of new
construction needed to be performed in the City limits and
$1,000,000.00 in needed maintenance. Traditional funding
sources are not adequate for these improvements. The
developers should pay their fair share for this work while
the City must also participate on behalf of the existing
population. This cost breaks down to approximate $820.00
per acre for the 11 square miles of property in the City.
CUP-7-89
PAGE NO. 5
CUP 7-89 is being developed on 2.5 acres. Therefore their
fair share contribution to mitigate their impact on the
expressway is $2050.00.
Additional development with its added traffic has an impact
on existing streets. Residential development has more
traffic originating from it. Industrial traffic generally
has heavier traffic. Commercial areas attracts traffic.
All of this leads to a breakdown of the streets.
Development also adds more street mileage to maintain. The
funding sources for road maintenance are essentially the
same as those for road construction. These sources don't
begin to cover the road repairs needed. There are
approximately 100 miles of roadway in the City that need
some degree of maintenance. The estimated cost of this
maintenance is $5,000,000 for the next ten years. The City
will receive approximately $1,500,000 during this time
period for road maintenance. This adds up to a cost of
$500.00 per acre or $1250.00 for CUP 7-89. This will pay
for maintenance and road maintenance equipment which reduces
the cost of the work.
Schools are impacted by residential development. State law
has set the maximum that can be charged for school impact
mitigation for both residential and non-residential uses.
Unless state law changes, the impact of development on
schools is generally considered as mitigated.
Residential development increases demand for public
facilities such as libraries, youth centers, senior centers,
etc. Some of these facilities are funded from outside
sources. There are no standard funding mechanisms for these
facilities. Each time a need for a new building is
determined, governmental agencies scramble to find a funding
source. Examples of funding sources are Community
Development Block Grant entitlement funds, bond sales, and
sale/lease back.
The possible City public facilities that will be need in the
future, as identified by staff are a youth center, expanded
senior citizens center, and police department expansion.
Youth center is estimated to cost $200,000.00, an expanded
senior center $10,000.00, and police department expansion
unknown at this time. These estimated costs plus a figure
of $250,000.00 for possible future expansion of the City
total $460,000.00. This translates to $65.00 per acre.
The fair charge contribution of CUP 7-89 for their impact on
the future needed public facilities is $162.50.
CUP-7-89 PAGE NO. 6
DISCUSSION
The proposed project went to Staff Review on March 15, 1989.
Because the development has more than five units and is two
story in height, a conditional use permit is required.
The project will have 16 one and 16 two bedrooms with one
bathroom, and 6 three bedrooms with one bathroom and a
"powder room".
CUP 7-89 will be in substantial compliance with the City's
Zoning Ordinance 340.
CUP 7-89 is in substantial compliance with the City's
General Plan.
The environmental impacts identified by staff must be
mitigated prior to development. This can be accomplished
through mitigation fees and/or construction methodology.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution
89-34, approving Conditional Use Permit 7-89 and adopting
the Staff Report, and the attached Findings of Fact and
Conditions of Approval and adopt a Negative Declaration.
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
CUP-7-89
PAGE NO. 7
I I THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
IL Redevelopment Agency.
WHEREAS, Tract 25021 is located within the boundaries of the
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission acts as the Redevelopment
Agency's planning body.
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission held a public hearing
regarding Tract 25021 on September 13, 1989.
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission made recommendations to the
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
WHEREAS, The Redevelopment Agency has reviewed the staff
reports and Planning Commission minutes.
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission made the determination
that:
FINDINGS OF FACT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 25021
Tentative Parcel Map 25021 is not located within a known
flood zone.
Tentative Parcel Map 25021 is not located with a know
special seismic study zone.
Idyllwild Drive is designated as a 88' secondary highway.
Utilities are available to the site with main line
extensions.
Tentative Parcel Map 25021 is in substantial compliance with
the City's Subdivision Ordinance and the Subdivision Map
Act.
Tentative Parcel Map 25021 is within the historic range o
the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat.
Natural grade and drainage is to the north.
WHEREAS, The REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY reviewed each Planning
Commission recommendation including their Findings of Fact.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, Tentative Parcel Map 25021 is
approved in accordance with the Findings of Fact.
RESOLUTION NO. RDA-89-7
2
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
3
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO APPROVING TRACT 25021
MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED this 17th day of October, 1989 by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
2 ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
3
ATTEST:
4
5
Chairman
6
7
Secretary
8
CERTIFICATE
9
I hereby certify the foregoing is a true copy of Resolution
No. RDA-89-7 duly adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City
0 of San Jacinto on the day of 1989.
12 Secretary
13
14
15
16
17
18
20
2 9
23
24
95
20
27
28
29
30
31
32
TiTAT V F. ID. i( u u (/ 4 IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO , STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOT 35 `EXIST. VACA N RESIDENCE N \, PARCEL / 2_26 AC. CA ASS 2-33 AC, ;Sr1 PARCEL 2 2.25 AC 05355 2.53 AC. ,.'sr ii \'-itlt cat I.1:71.1, cHr— LaY3 II T T 'c '41 E.:KIST. S. H. S. FOOTBALL FIELD CF ; Exhibit A RealQIion RDA 89-7 C.TE • OWnIER JAC 413215712 127:1 CS 15 41130 IAAYST.F.A'S •.:,!4•3;T, CA 26241 APPLICC.,NT 12 7.32 39.1:1F1, ST. , CS. 43473 1'0712 23.11:3 EN TINE ER ,3.'2N 9 4:247 SI ASS:VS.22 , , 655. 0ST.5.27...3)1. II 1.625653 r1.4 ?!.41.JA!" LEG AL DESCRIPTION 0.:1521 CF 16123 CF 152145260 inF' •' - 2:2.< 5, FA:2 227 CF 5.53,5A•76 LU C5,1( 5553 PROPERTY IN FOR" ATION 15665 CF I-21S 2 12131 41.5.24324 4.71 • • • ,3 L 15. 434 • C7: • C;3 • C4:11:211 TT% . P•2 11.:2541 0.11'55565 66.2.15 05502327 2:=7 25 0067:655 UTZ' '23.2:.: 1.7.!:21'Y 013 55562, 660F.:12=217 LAN: 1:22 C• 2 , 25, 0.7, 127135414: :ATA ES V.:.3•,•21' C472: 242,9 i21.3 1:Sr 111 655526:6 , 6-V3111: 556 v1:3!.1 LAN: UTILITIES • C;21' C." 313 21.:"!.•12 11415 C',TY CF 219 41T'N13 • 555:10:3265" C). 2031 13, CV-7F, CA5 CO 2263531 32. 6.275::1" SAN 21::2A53 6N:3752 223"..2" VICINITY MAP TYPICAL SECTION IDYLLWILD DRIVE Ap p, ,.,*A. Cit CF 2.612 4465,13 ----- TENTATIVE PARCEL 1.1.A? NO. 25021 041 APpeav. Cy; • Ni•rIC 4/.7 0.• 9n59. Or•wn: C SI Cr,s ckoat Ar 23 "`" 239
GEND
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
October 13, 1989
Tract 24713, Variance 4-89, Change of Zone 13-89 and
Planned Unit Development 4-89
The City Council held a hearing on the subject cases on October
3, 1989. The case was continued due to questions regarding
drainage. Some confusion also existed over the mitigation
conditions for the Fire Department.
Attached for your use and information are the conditions of
approval recommended by the Planning Commission with modifications
clarifying the drainage and Fire Department issues.
If the Council desires to approve the proposed project, it would
be appropriate to take the following action.
Introduce Ordinance 876 and 89-RDA-4 to second reading
regarding Change of Zone 13-89 and Planned Unit
Development 4-89.
2. Adopt Resolution RDA 89-6 approving Tentative Tract 24713
and Variance 4-89.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:lr
MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING CONSULTA
• ( 8) 338•6518 1710 WEST CAMERON AVENUE, SUITE 100 WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA 91790
October 12, 1989
Mr. Brian McNabb, community Development Director
City of San Jacinto
201 E. Main Street
P.O. Box 488
San Jacinto, CA 92383
Dear Sir:
The subject property lies within Flood Zone C of the Flood
Insurance Rate Map of April 15, 1980; which indicates that there
is "minimal flooding." This minimal flooding will be in the nature
of sheet flow.
The property also fronts Idyllwild Drive, wh ich acts as a collector
for runoff from the subject tract as well as other property
fronting Idyllwild Drive.
The City is presently studying the feasibility of forming an
improvement district to fund certain storm drains such as Line J
and H, as shown of the San Jacinto Regional Area Drainage Plan.
The subject property will benefit by the construction of these
projects and has been included in the study as part of the "Area
of Benefit."
There are two matters involved: First, the protection of the
property from the sheet flow. The second being the increase in
runoff by changing the coefficient of runoff and time of
concentration as a result of development.
The protection of the property from sheet flow may be accomplished
by constructing the pads at -an elevation 12" above the adjoining
property and drain all lots to the street. In so doing, the
engineer, Unland & Associates must analyze the existing flow
pattern in the area to be assured that the drainage from the
adjoining property will not be obstructed.
Mr. Brian McNabb
October 12, 1989
Page 2
The second matter, concerning increased runoff, may be resolved by
providing a retention basin on one of the lots fronting Idyllwild
Drive. The volume to be determined by the difference in the
"before" and "after" hydrographs.
The latter solution may be waived due to the potential improvements
of the storm drains as mentioned above. In this case the engineer
should submit the hydrologic analysis in the "before and after
development" conditions and submit hydraulic calculations
indicating that Idyllwild Drive will carry the additional flow.
The City has the option of:
1. Deferring development until Line "H" is completed and
include the property in the improvement district. Line
"A" ends within 600 , of the property in Idyllwild Drive
and will provide a facility to collect runoff from the
tract. Line "J ." will intercept upstream flows.
2. Upon submittal of the hydrologic and hydraulic
calculations listed above, approve the map subject to the
conditions indicated by the calculated flows. In this
event, the developer must also pay the acreage fee for
future storm drain construction.
3. Approve the map subject to the conditions determined by
the hydrologic analysis, waive the drainage fee and
include the area in the improvement district. In the
event the district is not formed, the developer would be
required to pay the Storm drain acreage fee.
Because the improvement district is being seriously considered, it
appears that option 3 will be the best solution. In this instance
the developer should sign an agreement "to be included in the
improvement district and waive his right of protest. The agreement
should also clarify that the storm drain acreage fee will be paid
in the event the district does not proceed.
Yours very truly,
MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING CONSULTATNS
DUFFY/ITKINSON
DA:bp
CONDITIONS OFAPPROV. VESTING TEM IVE TRACT 24713
FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. Fire flows shall be a minimum 1000 GPM from two fire
hydrants and have a residual pressure of 20 psi.
2. Fire hydrant spacing shall be every 500 feet as located by
the Fire Department.
3. Developer shall paint the fire hydrant with fluorescent
paint and place a blue dot indicator on the pavement.
4. Full fire protection shall be installed and accepted prior
to the commencement of framing.
5. Turn radius in cul de sac shall be approved by the Fire
Department.
6. Address on the building shall be four inches in height and
posted on a contrasting background.
7. Establish Mello Roos District to mitigate impacts on Fire
Department.
PUBLIC WORKS
I. A marbelite street light pole shall be required.
2. Street trees shall be purchased from the City for planting.
3. Install curbs, gutters, and sidewalks with handicap ramps
per City standards and specifications.
4. Sidewalks shall be five and one-half feet in width.
5. Idyllwild Drive shall be reconstructed to center line.
6. A street striping and lighting plans shall be submitted for
approval.
7. A dedication of an additional 14 feet along Idyllwild Drive
shall be given.
8. Submit off site landscaping and automatic water system plans
for approval and install same.
9. Grading and public improvements shall be installed in
accordance with City Standards and Specifications.
10. All lots within the proposed subdivision shall be connected
to sewer.
11. Comply with FloL review letter dated Octot, 12, 1989
including option #3 on Page 2 of the letter.
12. Pay $150.00 per unit for traffic signalization.
13. Pay fees as outlined in environmental discussion for
mitigation of regional and local roadway maintenance.
14. Developer shall make provisions for all utilities and
franchise holders to go in a common trench.
15. Pay public facility mitigation fee as outlined in
environmental discussion.
16. Provide up to 10 ft. of dedication of right-of-way for Line
J of the Mster Drainage Plan along the east property line.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. Front yards shall be landscaped with automatic watering
system. Submit plans for City approval.
2. Fencing along the rear property line and between lots shall
be required. If the fencing is of wood, the poles shall be
2 3/4" in diameter galvanized steel, embedded in a 8" by 24"
concrete footing.
3. A decorative block wall is required around the perimeter of
the subdivision.
4. Participate in school mitigation.
5. Developer shall contribute to establish a Lighting and
Landscaping Maintenance District.
6. All applicable development fees effective at the time of the
issuance of the building permits shall be paid.
7. All existing and proposed utilities shall be underground.
8. Comply with recommendations of RCFC&WCD as determined by the
City and participate in the implementation of the Master
Drainage Plan as required by the City.
9. Drainage water shall not adversely affect downstream
properties.
10. A hydrology study shall be performed to mitigate the
drainage created by the subdivision. If a retention basin
is required it will be reflected on the grading plans.
11. Applicable storm drain fees shall be paid prior to the
recordation of the final map.
12. If the developh At is phased, the perimete )ublic
improvements Shall be constructed prior to Lhe completion of
the first phase.
13. Pay park fees per City regulations.
14. Pay $90.00 per unit toward construction and maintenance of
car pooling lot and program.
15. Provide computation for total building coverage.
16. Provide one guest parking for each dwelling unit.
17. Include in the CC&Rs a section prohibiting the parking of
recreational vehicles, boats, trailer, camper shells, etc.
18. Find an alternative placement of Line "J' of the Master
Drainage Plan.
19. A statement prohibiting the parking of recreational
vehicles, boats, trailers, camper shells, etc. shall be part
of the CC&Rs.
20. Occupancy, where allowed by law, shall be restricted to
adults ages 45 years and older.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
1. All required traffic signs shall be installed with the
approval of the traffic engineer.
2. Establish Mello Roos district to off set police department
impacts.
ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATING MONITORING
1. Developer shall provide a Declaration stating how all
significant environmental concerns will be mitigated, prior
to the recordation of a final map.
2. Upon the approval of the Declaration, it shall be noticed on
the Final Map and recorded simultaneously.
3. Upon the start of construction at six month intervals, and
prior to occupancy the developer shall provide a status
report relating to compliance with the mitigating measures.
4. Prior to occupancy, the City shall verify compliance with
the mitigating measures.
********
6.6.6806 AVA IN TI-E CITY OF SAN JACINTO TENTATIVE TRACT N."- 24713 DEVELOPMENT PLAN 104/11-V5 EJ/35.7 I...DT 105 S. J. L. . tP 791 STATE ST 72 73 7,1 75 76 tl 77 76 II 79 80 Zr, 131 104 LANE 371.. TYL',CAC 57N97e7" /01-Z. Wye_0. aT API.110Vn0 eV: ,„u Jan-. W UNonci & AraccOat T.0 VT 9, SAAl J5C1137Q t r6: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N. 247131; V/C /N/TY" t'-54P 68,4, J- 377.etr, Srreer serrnw 37-7,37:,3,3 3 7E3 7" 3' • Ary1110.3 'TYPICAL LOT LA VC:lc/7- A.,ele /089
6'.0' MC 10011 z 110104 1 C.Ll 0,00 I Cu. 5n1+100 PZIlt COLD • HOLZ LIWSIKA JVC/IICA • .1...P..LTS4 0111(1 104101111 0:400IIC0 • 110111901 00.9003 011101POW4 IMIti • 710a Vika 101100(01S 11+01C1 1141.01.* • IhOIA 1710010 CO.GCSIsis • 91110 111091 PICA IS C./0111 CRWOIr100l 0001104' • 1010i0111 n TYPICAL 001111 II CM/ s_.‘‘,,t 111 Ii' TYPICAL UNIT A --- I,' 0' Mr, 01111 ILK IA 11100 110IICA1100 1010, 0910111 LOIS OIL 0.1111 1110 ALIAS VIII LT 11111001C0 VIIn4 9114e4 Or 1 11.01:11 4111.51004 011(5. RI $15100 100 1110 YLLtil LPIAS 0,10 it 011(4 S10117 CC* lit ¶101 AREAS, All 11111011104 ICLISS LAD (0.111,1..1 0111 & LW P9(0101101 1111 ILK IIPS 00011010100 IT 10140100, ICAO, CA CCIAL, I CAL Lt.CA/IPTVS 1,0I0 • 11911 — 000910 C00(1 • plCit.o. PAV110.11$ P100I0111 .CP004111101 10110 10' D.C. 9001.0 01111 1101011 0(1111 11000010 'C.00101114 ISPIIt[. 100 I 1.4 CL1(111,41 1.0' D.C. 9:L114 11 101100$ 11(111000. V II MIN ail 0040 — I' 0' 11(1.1 11CCCRAI1St SILCO0 CIICL H,CH 0100 1001 1 (10:1 11.1C11 I CAI 901110 xtr..ut I'S • t. III of III( Hill .110PILVS 10.1/(711ct IS 'ILLA 1100000' • LIAIt 1,04C/I 110I))11 KIIIIYI(kKSIS"CAINIYAL . 10110V, 01110:PORIM IC0110 '1111111RS 00041 KY.% C1.4.61 • CAM C10111 0111 001l10(15 '1010J1 11111.101 01100I 1'1'0.1101S 11' 0.0. SPLCI14 1171C01 I COO. 9110000 zouffitts Anficuus . LILT CI INC HILL JJ,IPCIUS 1011(00I00I5 'MA NOW' • BO 100100$ ..1141001 001.10110 KcilIVIDCKSIS IVIPLI' • I10I081 01110S00(0.1I ICOIRA '.',tialltS WARP • WM/ xxx cama TYPICAL PLANTING LOT 16 070000 COVEN GALANIA SPLENCANS 'MAT SUI YELLOW TA AFRICAN °MSC( 11' 0.0. SPACING 1 GAL 000SAMTN1111 At AICANUS •• LILT OP THE NILE -NOR SHOt —^1 1111001 1 CM. 001011 CAL nCBC CUD PCB( LICUSIRui .14.(10140 • 1010111LC PRIY11 W.DINA COL051100 • 00011101 0010400 01110900(01 I00111 • rfrx 001000 ILINIRLPIS 1001(1 '0ALCIIII1c.' • 111010 111011190, 11100011 001,0011111 • ;MINI' 110094 11p1C01 II C.L1 I0(11 IIII 1L001(011 040.40111011 50011014' SCLOWL, 11000011 [—GROUND Cavil - ISTOPORUM PAVITOLIULT rnosiaArt 100,011LI THOM PLATT 74' 0.0A SPACING WITH 0,0111 ANN 00T11IVI01NSill 'CARNIVAL PURPLE- PILCH I GAL CONIAINIA 11'-0" 0.0, SPACING AT 10111000 1010111004 -- 16 GAL MAGNOLIA GITANDISLOSS TYPICAL PLANTING LOT 69 '100000 0 $7511. - SOUTHSAN MAGNOLIA LWILD DR 001 TLICALITTull AVDIS -011101 Qum 17.-0. HIGH 01 001101101 STUCCO ft 101 SC ALT 1•010.-0. 1011100 0710177 11111110 0 NU — TYPICAL P0,1111100 101 IT 14.00 PAHNLIT CIAASITCRA 'A TPOSUTIPURCAT - P011011 LE-Al PLUM f;t1AL pATNIOLISIS INDICA HIALLSRITIA'A. INDIA MAY(7,407171 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN rit'¶<1' 1"---GATISO StAltNO ARCA 149100II00 h011t CRUM 11111 PALO 091.7.$ ALL PLAW114 ARIAS 10 IX IRRICAITD VIII .4)101.011C 1,141C0I100 ScSICAS 01101/11C ICN 0110(1011111W 1(1175 An° CCUICYlisl n01010,C11.3(10 II 01111110, ICAO. (1 4(00110,.
ORDINANCE NO. 876
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF
ZONE 13-89 AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 4-89
AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section I. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby amended
by adding thereto Change of Zone 13 -89 and Planned Unit Development
4-89 as herein set forth.
Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the
City of San Jacinto shown on the attached maps marked Exhibit "A"
.made a part hereof, is hereby changed from (R-T) Renidential
9 1Trailer to (R-2,PUD) Two Family Residential zoning, with a
1deve1opment overlay.
—11 Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the
11 1 adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in
a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the
19 1 1 County of Riverside, State of California.
1311 Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council
Ion the seventeenth day of October 1989 by the following vote:
1
14,1
1 MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
the City Council on the day of 19 by the
15 1 following vote.
1 611
l
7
ATTEST:
19 1 1
90 1
Mayor
91
]Deputy City Clerk
9 311 0STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
91 ,1COUNTY OP RIVERSIDE,
- !CITY OF SAN JACINTO
CERTIFICATE
25 1 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy
9 6 of Ordinance No. 876 duly adopted by the city Council of the City
of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of
07 1989.
2
3
5 1
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
0 8,
acinto this
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San
day of 1989.
1 '1Deputy City Clerk
311!
- 1-
ORDINANCE 876
CHANGE OF ZONE 13-89
PUD 4-89
EXHIBIT "A"
) l e_
efr / ilili 4.4 1,,
,
• -p.#4.414 ,4,1404141, i,
../.._ 4,
JR HiGH
9]
9 2
23
9 4
95
9 6
ORDINANCE NO. 89-RDA -4
AN ORDINANCE OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 13-89 AND PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT 4-89 AND INCORPORATING IT
INTO THE ZONING MAP.
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the Agency has reviewed Change of Zone
-89 and Planned Unit Development 4-89.
SECTION 2. The designation of an R-2 Planned Unit
Development Zone is consistent with the City's General Plan.
SECTION 3. The City Council is hereby authorized to
establish a Planned Unit Development on the subject property
noted on Exhibit "A" if found to be consistent with City policies
and plans.
SECTION 4. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption
of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a
newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the
County of Riverside, State of California.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of said Redevelopment Agency
on the 17th day of October 1989.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the said
Redevelopment Agency on the day of 1989,
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
19
20
Chairman
Secretary
CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
I hereby certify the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance
No. 89-RDA-4 duly adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City
of San Jacinto on the of 1989.
97
28 Secretary
99
30
2
3
r.
6
8
9
0
2
13
4
16
17
32
•
ORDINANCE 89 RDA-4
CHANGE OF ZONE 13-89
PUD 4-89
EXHIBIT "A"
SAN J AC IN TO
SCHOOL eofr(#
4e
s#‘##i''
#
11110 *** JR HIGH •
9CHOOL
RESOLUTION NO. RDA-89-6
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO APPROVING TRACT 24713
AND RATIFYING VARIANCE 4-89
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, Tract 24713 and Variance 4-89 are located within the
boundaries of the Redevelopment Agency.
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission acts as the Redevelopment
Agency's planning body.
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission held a public hearing
regarding Tract 24713 and Variance 4-89 on August 16, 1989.
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission made recommendations to the
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
WHEREAS, The Redevelopment Agency has reviewed the staff
reports and Planning Commission minutes.
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission made the determination that:
FINDINGS OF FACT VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 24713
1. Vesting Tentative Tract 24713 is not located within a known
flood zone.
2. Vesting Tentative Tract 24713 is not located with a known
special seismic study zone.
3. Idyllwild Drive is designated as a 88 secondary highway.
4. Utilities are readily available to the site except sewer.
5. The subject property has a General Plan designation of medium
and high density.
9 6. The following impacts have been identified in the
environmental review and must be mitigated:
99
[1] Local and regional drainage
93
[3] Parks
[2] Local roadways and Intersections
[4] Public safety structures and equipment 9 4
[5] Public safety staffing
[6] Air quality 95
[7] Noise
[8] Regional transportation construction and 26
maintenance
[9] increased street repair and street cleaning and 27 support equipment
[10] School impact 98
[11] Need for youth centers, senior centers, and other
public facilities 29
7. Line "J" of the Master Drainage Plan may encroach onto the 30
subject property.
31
Tentative Tract 24713 is a Vesting Map.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
9 0
2
3
4
5
6
15
16
18
19
9 0
21
9 3
94
26
FINDINGS OF FACT
VARIANCE 4-89
8
9H 7 -
011
Variance 4-89 is not located within a known flood zone.
Variance 4-89 is not located with a known special seismic
study zone.
Idyllwild Drive is designated as a 88 secondary highway.
The subject property has a General Plan designation of medium
and high density.
The applicant is requesting a variance to the required average
25 foot front yard to an average 21 feet.
The property does not have peculiar condition to the property
that it cannot be developed to comply with the average 25 foot
front set back.
The strict literal interpretation of the Ordinance 340 will
not result in any practical difficulty or unnecessary
hardship.
8. The City has not allowed a reduced average front yard set back
to other Planned Unit Developments.
2
A special circumstance will be given if the front yard average
is reduced.
1411 10. Variance to allow the driveway to be utilized for the required
guest parking has been given to other PUD developments if the
driveways are a minimum 20 feet.
1. T19271, PUD 1-83 and T24047, PUD 2-89 were given variances as
related to guest parking.
WHEREAS, The REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY reviewed each Planning
Commission recommendation including their Findings of Fact.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, Vesting Tentative Tract 24713 is approved
In accordance with the Conditions of Approval and Findings of Fact.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ratifies
Variance 4-89.
99
MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED this 17th day of October, 1989 by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
27
28
Chairman
29
30
31
Secretary
CERTIFICATE
3 9
I hereby certify the foregoing is a true copy of Resolution
No. RDA-89-6 duly adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City
of San Jacinto on the day of 1989.
Secretary
1311
RsM .P1,944. n 7-11.4.44 s7-.410- vrt 4 1-,/145AQ • J I -NDIATTPUT.X71.-41-.= xrnot UNktro 1,0C I er t•ntOt •••••.4. 0,n•••tt t71•J •nn te ris w HTATTVC TRACT AJ../P ittt /. • At. • tel• N., it I .• Lt • ONINtioartt• roteter .ne.S410.....tra:firtnnjerC22.7( "rfcr•C/1:7,'c'.r' RESOLUTION NO. RDA-89-6 TENTATIVE TRACT 24713. W II. ttt".. CL 4 NN Lo 7 103 . HY T CiTY 61+ AIN JACIRccn • . :VESTING., • • -:--WrivE;.,TRACT.:. • N! ...247 " 84 DEVELOPMENT pLAN''" 71-1.1215Z•ii * I \ I6. 104/11-V, 30 29 E41.5.TIN3 MMLEXC10;E: vicifv/r P-1,4 P t•1 t tt. t.t.D.11 i C. pvt,r.st ,et N, eqt• oa, ".* itot it 4. tttlt .•n•.4,• la 1,a, ttt 01,, 1,e It ots, tt ttWeltrct.tto ,,ti• • Ittt, tett, N•It •••••n nn•• •It 1,1,5, 0/357 1.0? 105 ,SIL.A. 4.07- LaYovr
RESOLUTION NO. RDA-89-6
VARIANCE 4-89
JR HIGI-i -
aCHOOL
AGEND
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: October 13, 1989
SUBJ: Ordinance 879, Change of Zone 12-89
Attached is a copy of the Staff Report concerning Change of Zone
12-89. The Planning Commission has recommended the adoption of
Ordinance 879 subject to Findings of Fact and the granting of a
Negative Declaration.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:lr
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
SUBJ: CHANGE OF ZONE 12-89, Ordinance 879
DATE: October 13, 1989
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
MAX CROSS AND THE CITY
1807 E. OLYMPIC BLVD.
LOS ANGELES, CA 90021
North of First Street, east of Mistletoe
Avenue, south of Artesia Street and west
of the east boundary of Tentative Tract
24745
DESCRIPTION
A proposal to change the zone on approximately 20 acres from A,
Agricultural to R-1, Single Family zone, located within Tentative
Tract 24745 and between the extension of Vernon Avenue and the
extension of Mistletoe Avenue.
General Plan Exhibit "A"
Current Zoning Exhibit "B"
Proposed Zoning Exhibit "C"
Existing Uses Exhibit "D"
Circulation Exhibit "E"
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The property is located not within a designated "A" flood zone.
There is no known seismic zone crossing the property, the nearest
zone is approximately 1-1/4 mile to the northeast.
Utilities are available to serve the site with main line extensions
and system improvements.
Vernon Avenue is designated as a 66' collector street. However,
the house that on the north west corner of Vernon and First Street
will be partially within the right of way.
Artesia Street is designed to be a 52' residential street. Peach
Street and First Street are designated as a 60' local street.
The San Jacinto area has been designated as a portion of the
habitat area of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat.
DISCUSSION
The applicant is requesting the change of zone from A, Agricultural
to R-1, Single Family Residential.
The City expanded the change of zone area to include land bounded
by the east boundary of Tentative Tract 25099 to the east, Artesia
Street to the north, Mistletoe Avenue to the west and First Street
to the south.
The current surrounding zoning are R-1 to the south, and A,
Agriculture to the east and west and County A-1-10 to the north.
The current general plan designation is Low Density Residential
within the tract map and to the east, west and south of the site
and Rural Residential/Agricultural the north.
Planning and zoning regulations for the State of California
requires the general plan and the zoning be consistent.
Change of Zone 12-89 will bring the zoning into compliance with
the General Plan of the City.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission adopted Resolution 89-72 recommending the
City Council approve Change of Zone 12-89 subject to the Findings
of Fact and grant a Negative Declaration. Staff recommends the
Council approve Ordinance 879 and grant a Negative Declaration.
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:lr
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Vernon Avenue is designated as a 60 local street.
2. Artesia Street is planned to be a 52' residential street.
3. If Vernon Avenue is built to its ultimate width of way, the
house on the northwest corner will be partially right of
way.
4. The General Plan shows the subject site to have a Low
Density Residential Density designation.
5. State of California regulations requires the general plan be
consistent with the zoning.
6. Change of Zone 12-89 will bring the zoning on the subject
site in conformance with the City's General Plan.
( I AVE. ingle Family EXHIBIT "B" CZ 12-89 CURRENT ZONING Agricultural 1
CITY LIMITS ARTESIA Low Density Residentia EXHIBIT "A" CZ 12-89 GENERAL PLAN FIRST Medium Density Residential
( R-1, Single Family EXHIBIT "C" CZ 12-89 PROPOSED ZONING
1 Vacant CITY LIMITS ARTESIA AVE Single Family LtJ 1/2 Acre Residential Vacant Single Family PEACH ST ear • EXHIBIT "D" CZ 12-89 EXISTING USES RST ST
CITY LIMITS LLJ PEACH 52' ST EXHIBIT "E" CZ 12-89 CIRCULATION • :-,C11,41.".V.2.-, *JOS 60 Residential ST 0 4-) 0 L.) (.0 LC) Ll)
14
15
16
17
18
19
9 0
9]
99
23
24
25
26
27
28
9 9
30
31
ORDINANCE NO. 879
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF
ZONE 12-89 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby amended
by adding thereto Change of Zone 12-89 as herein set forth.
Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the
City of San Jacinto shown on the attached maps marked Exhibit "A"
made a part hereof, As hereby changed from A, Agricultural to
R-1, Single Family.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in
a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the
County of Riverside, State of California.
Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council
on the 17th day of October 1989 by the following vote:
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
the City Council on the day of 19 by the
following vote.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Mayor
Deputy City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy
of Ordinance No. duly adopted by the City Council of the City
of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of
1989.
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of
San Jacinto this day of 1989.
Deputy City Clerk
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
:12 -1
CITY LIMITS
R-1, Single Family
I
R-1, Single Family PEACH ST NO LOS BANOS 'R-1, Single Family
EXHIBIT "A"
CZ 12-89
ORD. #879
AGEND
M E M 0,
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
DATE: October 13, 1989
SUBJ: Change of Zone 14-89, Ordinance 880
Attached for your use and information is the Staff Report for
Change of Zone 14-89. The original request was for R-T zoning.
At the hearing the applicant indicated full support of R-3 zoning.
The Planning Commission has recommended the Council approve
Ordinance 881 establishing R-3 zoning on the subject property and
grant a Negative Declaration.
Respectfully Submitted,
/
BRIAN MC NABS
Director of Community Development
BKM:lr
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: October 13, 1989
SUBJ: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND
CHANGE OF ZONE 14-89
APPLICANT: J. T. Francis and City of San Jacinto
DESCRIPTION
The applicant J. T. Francis applied for a zone change on the 10
gross acres on the NE corner of Midway and Santa Fe. The City has
expanded the request to include the two adjacent properties to the
north (up to and adjoining the Veterans of Foreign War.
EXISTING ZONING
PROPOSED ZONING
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
CURRENT USE
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
FLOOD ZONE
SEISMIC ZONE
Exhibit "A"
Exhibit "B"
Exhibit "C"
Exhibit "D"
Exhibit "E"
Exhibit "F"
Exhibit "G"
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The property is within a designated "A" Flood Zone. Compliance
with the City's Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance is required at
the time of development.
CZ 14-89 PAGE NO.
The property is in the middle of a special studies zone with faults
suspected to the south and north. Prior to any development, the
Alquist-Priolo act must be met. This generally entails
identification of the fault location and a creation of a
50' separation between the fault and development.
Utilities are available to serve the site provided main line
extensions are made. Sewer belongs to the City of San Jacinto.
The sewer currently ends at Oakwood. Water is available, however
system improvements may be necessary. Other utilities are
available.
Santa Fe AVenue is designated on the General Plan as a collector
highway (66'). The intent is a two lane road, but 4 lanes can be
accommodated without moving the curb.
Midway Avenue is a local street, but serves as the only cross road
to San Jacinto Avenue between Menlo and Esplanade. In the future,
higher traffic volumes on Midway are anticipated.
The master drainage plan calls for a storm drain in the area of
Midway, which is part of the system which is the southerly inlet
into the Buena Vista Retention Basin.
Noise from traffic will effect any development as cars and trucks
move very quickly in both directions. Residential development will
have to be adequately buffered from the street.
Drainage from any development on the subject property will
adversely impact the existing ditch on Santa Fe. Until the master
drainage plan is implemented, drainage will be required to be
retained on site.
ENVIRONMENTAL DISCUSSION
The City has expanded this zone change to fill in the missing gap
south of the Veterans of Foreign War property. The General Plan
calls for high density residential, therefore R-3 and R-T zoning
are appropriate.
R-T developments are difficult to place in the flood zone because
of the anchorage requirements. R-T also may not be a preferrable
use across from the industrial zoning that exists in the City of
Hemet.
CZ 14-89 PAGE NO. 2
Hemet is currently reviewing their General Plan which may result
in a change in this area. Until this is complete in the next 12-
18 months, we must assume the land use will be industrial.
Another view of the situation is that we have created R-2 and R-
3 zoning all along the east side of Santa Fe, south of Esplanade.
R-T will provide an alternate land use in this area.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommended the adoption of Ordinance 880,
setting the zone of the subject property as R-3 on all
properties covered by Change of Zone 14-89, and grant a Negative
Declaration.
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:lr
CZ 14-89 PAGE NO.
I 620/ C-1. NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL
C-1. NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL
C- 2 . GENERAL
COMMERCIAL
CITY OF HEMET
C-1. COMMERCIAL
.sT
Jr
PI WAY AVE.
C-1. NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL
EXHIBIT A
CUP 14-89
CURRENT ZONING
EXHIBIT B
CUP 14-89
PROPOSED ZONING
I
HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL
cf)
COMMUNITY
COMMERC I A L
1`1/RWAY AVE.
HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL
COMMUNITY
COMMERCIAL
CITY OF HEMET
COMMERCIAL
EXHIBIT C
CUP 14-89
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
SF RESIDENT
VACANT
LAND
MOB ILEHOME
PARK
VACANT
LAND
/'1//14/A >-
VACANT 1
LAND
AVE.
COMMERCIAL
BUSINESS
EXHIBIT 0
CUP 14-89
CURRENT USES
6;o"
60' LOCAL STREET
/15 -GI/A Y AV E .1
;1
EXHIBIT E
CUP 14-89
CIRCULATION ELEMENT
EXHIBIT F
CUP 14-89
FLOOD ZONES
z <1
KEY TO MAP
Year Flood Boundary
ZONE B
100 -Year Flood Boundary
Zone Designations
100 -Year Flood Boundary
500 -Year Flood Boundary
Base1 food Elevation Line
With Elevation lo leer • •
ZONE B
512
/ loud Elevation in I net
lEE 91371
Mute Unitorin Within ZOIle °
lIt-i atiOn ReherrtrrctMark RM7x
Zone 0 Boundary
ktriof Mdr • N11.5
• ttefcrent.ed to the Natnrrrr rI t;crndolic Vcrti cat Oaloon o f 012.1
"EXPLANATION OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS
ZONE
EXPLANAlION
A Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations anl
flood Ira/aid lactOrs (lot detcrrorned.
AO Areas of 100-year shallow flooding where depth,
arc between one (I) and three (3) feet, average denrhi
of inundation are shown, but no flood hazard faont,
arc determined.
AN
Areas of 100-year shallow flooding where depths
are between one (I) and three (3) feet: base flood
elevations are shown, but no flood hazard factors
are determined,
Al -A30 Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations and
flood hazard factors determined.
A99 Areas of 100-year flood to be protected by flood
protection system under construction; base flood
elevations and flood hazard factors not determined.
Areas between limits of the 100-year flood and 500-
year flood; or certain areas subject to 100-year floodt
ing with average depths less than one (1) foot or where
tIre contributing drainage area is less than one square
mile; or areas protected by levees from the base flood.
(Medium shading)
Areas of minimal flooding. (No shading)
Areas of undetermined, but possible, flood hazards.
Areas of 100-year coastal flood with velocity (w-air
action); base flood elevations and flood hazard lactori
not determined.
V1-V30 Areas 01 100-year Coastal flood with velOcity
action); base flood elevations and flood hazard la,tors
determined.
NOTES To USER
Certain areas not in tho special flood hazard areas (ZurreS A and V)
may be protected try flood control structures.
This may is for flood insurance tiortn iiSei only: it does 001 '‘‘.'"'
sarily show all areas subject in flooding in the t.ornmuttitt, tit
all planiinetric features Outside Special flOOLI Ira,kral
or adjoining OW flaunts, See separately printed lodes To ,llan
Partts.
Levee
LIMIT OF
DETA1LEE
STUDY
,o4
MAP EXPLANATION
Potentially Active Faults
Faults considered to have been active during Quaternary time; solid line
1906 c
. where accurately located, long dash where approximately located, short dash
where inferred, dotted where concealed; query (?) indicates additional un.
certainty. Evidence of historic offset indicated by year of earthquake-
• ••• ' associated event or C for displacement caused by creep or possible creep.
Aerial photo lineaments (not field checked); based on youthful geomorphic
and other features believed to be the results of Quaternary faulting.
Special Studies Zone Boundaries
o 0 These are delineated as straight-line segments that connect encircled turning
pY:1 n 1•"CA n 'G
Seaward projection of zone boundary.
EXHIBIT G
CUP 14-89
SEISMIC ZONES
c 7 2 D r e - i n
I
l'ea ter,'
,
CO
• 0
vas 0 0.0 0 0 +
*
•
•
• 0 •
•
•
A
ORDINANCE NO. 880
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF
ZONE 14-89 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO
3
4 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN jACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
5
Section I. That Ordinance No. 340 is.hereby amended
6 by adding thereto Change of Zone 14-89 as herein set forth.
Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the
City of San Jacinto shown on the attached maps marked Exhibit "A"
made a part hereof, is hereby changed from C-1, Neighborhood
Commercial to R-T, Residential Trailer.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in
a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the
County of Riverside, State of California.
Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council
on the 17th day of October 1989 by the following vote:
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
the City Council on the day of 19 by the
following vote.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
9 0
21
Mayor
9 ')
Deputy City Clerk
23
95
26
97
98
9 9
30
31
CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy
of Ordinance No. duly adopted by the City Council of the City
of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of
1989.
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of
San Jacinto this day of 1989.
Deputy City Clerk
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
13
19
3 0 -1-
C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL
6,30
C-1 . NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL
C-2. GENERAL
COMMERCIAL
-P Cl/WAY AVE.I
CITY OF HT
C-1. COMMERCIAL \k
cj
C-1. NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL
EXHIBIT "A"
CZ 14-89
ORD. #880
AG c
MEMO
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJ:
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
October 13, 1989
CHANGE OF ZONE 16-89
ORDINANCE NO. 881
APPLICANT: Brea Trading
P.O. Box 6868
San Diego, Ca. 92106
Attached is the Staff Report for Change of Zone 16-89. This
property was recently zoned S-D (Senior Development) along with
property all the way to Main Street. However, the Main Street
property was sold off separately and the applicant is proposing a
single family subdivision on the property and is therefore
requesting a change of zone.
The Planning Commission has recommended the Council adopt
Ordinance 881 and grant a Negative Declaration.
Respectfully Submitted,
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
BKM:ga
S .2‘.1. ER. E> CD 172.
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: October 13, 1989
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND
CHANGE OF ZONE 16-89
APPLICANT: BREA TRADING
P.O. BOX 6868
SAN DIEGO, CA 92106
DESCRIPTION
A proposal to change the zone of approximately 2.72 acres
generally located south of Second Street, east of Vernon Avenue,
north of Main Street, west of Camino Los Banos from S-D, Senior
Development to R-1, Single Family Residential.
CURRENT ZONING
CURRENT GENERAL PLAN
CURRENT USES
PROPOSED ZONING
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN
EXISTING CIRCULATION
ELEMENT
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT B
EXHIBIT C
EXHIBIT D
EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT F
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
The subject site is not within a known "A" or"B" Flood Zone nor
is it within a special seismic study zone. There are seismic
study areas about one mile to the northeast along the river and
to the southwest about two miles.
All utilities are available to the site.
The property is in the range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat.
Prior to any development a biological report must be approved by
the U. S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.
DISCUSSION
On August 2, 1988 the City approved Change of Zone 6-88 changing
the zoning designation from R-1, Single Family Residential to
S-D, Senior Development. CZ 6-88 was needed for a plan to
develop a senior apartment complex between Main and Second
Streets.
Since that time 2.63 acres fronting Main Street had been sold to
another developer who plans to build a 46 unit senior apartments.
This leaves about 2.72 acres of S-D zoned property with access
from Second Street.
Presently, Second Street is not improved or dedicated.
Tentative Tract 25099 is before the Commission tonight and a
condition of approval will include the requirement of dedicating
and improving Second Street.
The primary land use along Second Street is single family
residential.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends the adoption of Ordinance No.
881 including the Staff Report, and the attached Findings of Fact
and approving Change of Zone 16-89 and adopt a Negative
Declaration.
Brian McNabb
Director of Community Development
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. No known special seismic study area is located within CZ 16-
89.
2. CZ 16-89 is not within an "A" or "B" Flood zone.
3. All utilities are available to the subject site.
4. The property is in the range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat.
5. Land use along Second Street is single family residential.
6. Access to the site is by way of Second Street.
-",.(-?K ,:;/.
R-1, Single Familri)
'W V: \.,"-)r-- RN)
R-1 Single .FamilY I NNNNNNN\N
R-T, Mobile Home
R-1, Single Family
"
)
Neighborhood Commercial"
C-I, Neighborhood Commercial
or•
- FM
41.
EXHIBIT "A"
TT 25099
CURRENT ZONING
sr-- firtsr
- - F/RST -
1 Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residentia
l
)
:
113.
Low Density Residential
C2)
Downtown Commercial
nnn•
'or
Sr
57'
EXHIBIT "B"
TT 25099
CURRENT GENERAL PLAN
Mobile Home
EXHIBIT "C"
TT 25099
CURRENT USES
EXHIBIT "D"
CZ 16-89
PROPOSED ZONING
EXHIBIT "E"
CZ 16-89
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN
EXHIBIT "F"
TT 25099
EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT
ORDINANCE NO. 881
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE
OF ZONE 16-89 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY
OF SAN JACINTO
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby
amended by adding thereto Change of Zone 16-89 as herein set
forth.
Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the
City of San Jacinto shown on the attached maps marked Exhibit "A"
made a part hereof, is hereby changed from S-D, Senior
Development to R-1, Single Family.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 ayor
21
22
23
24
95
26
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy
27 of Ordinance No. 881 duly adopted by the City Council of the City
of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of
8 1989.
29
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City o
San Jacinto this day of 1989.
30
Deputy City Clerk
6
7
8
-1-
2
3
4
5
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the
adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in
a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the
County of Riverside, State of California.
Introduced at a regular meeting of said City
Council on the 17th day of October, 1989 by the following vote:
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of
he City Council on the day of 19 by the
ollowing vote.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
MA IN -----AfAlN r
EXHIBIT "A"
CZ 16-89
ORD. 0881