Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Special Meeting 3/19/1996AGENDA SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY DATE: March 19, 1996 TIME: 6:00 P.M. PLACE: COMMUNITY CENTER 625 SOUTH PICO SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA 1 0 CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Prayer of Invocation - Pastor Gordon Houston Pledge of Allegiance Staff and Council anticipate going to Closed Session immediately following commencement of the meeting on agenda item 9.1. 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 2.1 10 Year Service Award - Curtiss, Curtis 3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person may address the Council on any subject pertaining to City business not listed on the agenda, during this portion of the meeting. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the Council. 3.1 Written Correspondence Regarding Annendale Park - Ann Hennessey RECOMMENDATION: Provide staff direction based on input from staff. Convene the Redevelopment Agency in joint session with the City Council for the consideration of the following: 4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 4.1 Update on Soboba Village 4 Issues - Evans/McNabb RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. 1 Adjourn the Redevelopment Agency and continue acting in the capacity of the City Council for the remainder of the agenda. 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion by the City Council in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests specified items to be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come forward, upon invitation of the Mayor, state their name, address and the Consent Calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. 5.1 Minutes of Special Meeting of February 20, 1996. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of February 20, 1996, as presented. 5.2 Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 20, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 20, 1996, as presented. 5.3 Minutes of Special Joint Meeting of February 27, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Joint Meeting of February 27, 1996, as presented. 5.4 Minutes of the Special Meeting of February 27, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special February 27, 1996, as presented. 5.5 Minutes of the Special Meeting of March 1, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special March 1, 1996, as presented. 5.6 Minutes of the Special Meeting of March 2, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special March 2, 1996, as presented. Meeting of Meeting of Meeting of 5.7 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 5, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 5, 1996, as presented, 5.8 Minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of March 7, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of March 7, 1996, as presented. 5.9 Warrant Register RECOMMENDATION: Approve warrant numbers 42559 through 42649 dated March 15, 1996 in the amount of $938,229.61 and Payroll check numbers 6952 through 7021 dated February 16, 1996. 5.10 Treasurer's Report - February 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. 5.11 Claim - GTE Telephone Operations RECOMMENDATION: Reject the claim as presented as recommended by the Claims Adjustor, pursuant to Government Code Section 913. 5.12 Approval of Contract with Kammeyer & Associates for Design of Tot Lot and Tot Lot Repairs RECOMMENDATION: Approve the contract with Kammeyer & Associates for design of a new Tot Lot in Sallee Park and design of ADA retrofit for the tot lots in Rancho Park and the open space on Villines north of Esplanade Avenue, for a fee of $10,027. 5.13 Approval of Contract with NBS-Lowry for Design of Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter at Various Locations RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approve the contract with NBS-Lowry for design of sidewalk, curb and gutter on Seventh Street at various locations for CDBG and SB821 grants for a fee of $6,720.00. 2. Acknowledge the grant of $22.500 of SB821 funds from the Riverside. County Transportation Commission and direct the Finance Director to prepare the appropriate budget accounts. 5.14 Acceptance of Dedication 5.14.1 Location: Lots 84, 85. and 86 - Tract 21900 5.14.2 Location: Lots 1, 91, and 92 - Tract 21900-1 RECOMMENDATION: Accept offers of dedication of subject parcels for open space and landscape. Approval of Contract for Services - Interim City Manager RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Contract for Services for Interim City Manager, Lyle Alberg for a monthly rate of $6,500 with no benefits except use of a City vehicle. Contract to be in effect from March 8, 1996 through September 8, 1996 or until the hiring and commencement of services of a new City Manager. 3 5.16 Approval of Job Descriptions - Customer Service Representative 1,11 and III and Accountant RECOMMENDATION: Approve Job Descriptions and classifications and establish salary ranges in the Miscellaneous. Group for Customer Service Representative i;ll and III and Accountant. 5.17 Introduction of Ordinance Repealing Section 1 of Ordinance No. 964, Pertaining to Payment for City Clerk Services RECOMMENDATION: Waive the reading in full and read by title only and introduce (First Reading) Ordinance No. Repealing Section 1 of Ordinance No. 964, Pertaining to Payment for City Clerk Services. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,. CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE 964, AND PERTAINING TO PAYMENT FOR CITY CLERK SERVICES END OF CONSENT CALENDAR. Motion by: Seconded by; to approve consent calendar items 5.1 through 5.17. f6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY DEPARTMENTS 7.1 Preliminary Traffic Analysis for Ramona Boulevard Between Chase Street and Potter Road - Evans RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff to prepare cost estimates for installation of reflective center line delineation and installation of flashing lights warning of cross -traffic ahead on Ramona Boulevard between Potter Road and Chase. Street. 7.2 Consideration of Options Related to Payment of Outstanding Annexation 66 Fees - McNabb (Continued from 3/5/96) RECOMMENDATION: 1, Direct staff to prepare a Resolution creating a 50% forgiveness to the Annexation 66 fees if paid prior to July 1, 1996, and a 25% forgiveness to the Annexation 66 fees if paid prior to January 1, 1997. 4 2. Direct staff to prepare a notice, to be placed on all properties in the City, notifying owners that prior to development, their property may be subject to development fees. Said fees vary from property to property. Prior to development, the owner should determine from the City, which fees are applicable. 7.3 Appointment/Status Report Committee Vacancies - McNabb 7.3.1 Agricultural Advisory Committee RECOMMENDATION: Appoint two members from the list provided at the meeting. 7.3.2 Accessibility Appeals Board RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to seek volunteers for the committee. 7.3.3 City Farming Committee RECOMMENDATION: The committees will make appointments and come back to Council for ratification. 7.3.4 Community Preservation Committee RECOMMENDATION: Appoint John Palmer Jr. as an alternate and ratify terms of office as identified, in the staff report. 7.4 Review of City Museum Budget - Herrera RECOMMENDATION: Consider the Museum Association's request for / clarification on the $500 budget cut to curator contract services. Utility Billing Policy on Delinquent Accounts - Herrera RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the following collection policy for water, sewer and/or refuse/recycling-only accounts: All residential and commercial accounts that have received water, sewer and/or,refuse/recycling services will be, responsible for paying back all charges to the determined date of move -in. The mandatory refuse/recycling charges will apply even if the resident neglects to sign up for service. 8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS 8.1 Mid -Year Budget Adjustments - Conner/Cornett RECOMMENDATION: Receive the mid -year budget review for fiscal year 1995.96 and the line -by-line revenue and expenditure budget adjustments as detailed below; review the Council Budget Committee's 5 recommendation for the 1996-97 fiscal year budget compilation. 8.2 Fiscal Year 1996-97 Council Budget Ad hoc Committee Status Report/Budget Direction - Conner/Cornett - (Continuing item) 8.3 Riverside Transit Agency Status Report- Smedley 9.0 CLOSED SESSION Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9, City of San Jacinto vs. PMC 9.2 Conference with Legal Counsel Anticipation of Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(c) 1 Case 9.3 Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency negotiator: Richard Kreisler/John Herrera Employee organization: San Jacinto Police Association 9.5 Conference with Real Property Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: 269 Brown St, Negotiating Parties: Hults/McNabb/Chambers Under Negotiation: Price and terms Conference with Real Property Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: 289 Brown St: Negotiating Parties: Hults/McNabb/ De Selvie Under Negotiation: Price and terms Conference with Real Property Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: 297 Brown St. Negotiating Parties: Hults/McNabb/Martinez Under Negotiation: Price and terms 9.7 Conference with Real Property Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: 319 Brown St. Negotiating Parties: Hults/McNabb/Diversified Rehabilitation Investors Under Negotiation: Price and terms 9.8 Conference with Real Property Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Aa-'^', Property: APN# 435-020-019 Negotiating Parties: McNabb/Lawrence Rael Under Negotiation: Price and terms 9.9 Conference with Real Property Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: APN# 439-110-055 Negotiating Parties: McNabb/Kelly Murphy Under Negotiation: Price and terms 9.10 Conference with Real Property Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: APN# 439-110-081 Negotiating Parties: McNabb/Willie Ryan Under Negotiation: Price and terms 9.11 Conference with R-- 'yrNegotiator pursuant to. Government Code Section 549 - Property: A• N# 439-110-0 Negotiating labb/Larry Landsen Under Negotiation: Price and terms Conference with Legal Counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - Existing Litigation City of San Jacinto vs. PR Equities 10,0 ADJOURNMENT Motion by: Seconded: Action: to adjourn. Vote: i Pamela L. Lee, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that I caused to be posted the foregoing agenda this 14th day of March, 1996, as required by law. De uty City Clerk 3.1. 705 Attenborough Way San Jacidnto, CA 92583 March 13, 1996 City Manager Lyle Alberg City of San Jacinto 213 E. Main St.. San Jacinto, CA 92583 Dear Mr. Alberg: If possible, I would like to be put on the March 19 City Council agenda so that I can give a presentation on problems within the Annendale Park neighborhood. We have had graffiti problems, gang members meeting in our neighborhood, trash dumped by residents of the mobile home park next door, tumbleweeds that do not get cut and removed and we are having a tough time getting the city to help us solve our problems. The San Jacinto Police Department helped us form a Neighborhood Watch program three years ago, but officers will not patrol our neighborhood because we have an electronic gate at our entrance. The residents became discouraged and many stopped attending our Neighborhood Watch meetings because they considered the meetings to be a waste of time. Residents here have complained about the tumbleweeds since last fall, but we were told the city had no budget to do code enforcement in our neighborhood. The weeds are still stacked up, dry, against residents' fences. I have a few slides of the problems which I would like to'ahow the council and a petition signed by the residents. Sincerely, Ann Hennessey RECEIVED MAR 1 3 1996 C17yMANAGER'S OFFICE TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. , I CITY OF SAN JACINTO STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development via Lyle W. Alberg, Interim City Manager March 19, 1996 UPDATE OF SOBOBA SPRINGS VILLAGE 4 ISSUES RECOMMENDATION Receive and file. BACKGROUND At the study session of February 27, 1996 the Council heard presentations on several issues raised by the Village 4 homeowners. Below is an update as of March 13th. A. Why did Assessment District 94-1 tax bill go up? Staff was to send an informal newsletter detailing information the residents of future tax rates. We are gathering the information that will be included in the newsletter. Two lots are up for tax sale. On the consent calendar is an acceptance of various lots dedicated to the public. The Tax Collector's office indicated that this would be sufficient to pull the property off the tax rolls. C. Clean up around debris basin. Completed. D. Regular clean up of drainage ditches. This will be an ongoing operation, as it is needed and as personnel are available. The ditch was last cleaned about March 1st. E. LLMD irrigation control. This system is currently off due to the rain. Staff will continue monitoring the problem of excess moisture. Replace palm trees. A requisition for a palm tree has been processed. Delivery and installation should take place within the next several weeks. G. Reseeding the hillside (Village 6). In response to the latest letter from Jim Cox, Mr. James Ciernia, the present owner of Soboba Village 6, has indicated to us that he is willing to seed the bare area of his property, and has contacted a landscaper for a bid. The landscaping firm, Moore Landscape, has contacted the City for more information about what needs to be done. H. Debris basin maintenance. Staff had set up a meeting for last Friday with the new golf course manager. Unfortunately, Mr. Hornig had to cancel. Staff is trying to reschedule. I. Financial information on the Redevelopment Project. The Finance Department has begun looking for the material covering 1983-1989. A report will be brought back at the May 7th meeting. STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John Herrera, Finance Director Via: Lyle Alberg, Interim City Manager DATE: March 19, 1996 RE: Utility Billing Policy on Delinquent Accounts. RECOMMENDATION: It is respectfully requested that the City Council adopt the following collection policy for water, sewer and/or refuse/recycling-only accounts: All residential and commercial accounts that have received water, sewer and/or refuse/recycling services will be responsible for paying back all charges to the determined date of move -in. The mandatory refuse/recycling charges will apply even if the resident neglects to sign up for service. BACKGROUND: As a result of a recent audit by OK & Associates, the City's refuse hauler, there were 423 sewer and/or refuse/recycling accounts identified as being in the City's service area and not being billed by the City. Of these 423 accounts, 293 were sent a bill on March 10, 1996; the balance of the accounts will be sent a special bill as soon as the addresses are verified. Of the 293 bills sent out, 50 were returned as "vacant" and 10 were returned due to "wrong address" by the Post Office. Although residents are coming in to sign up for service, the issue that is still outstanding is the City's policy on the amounts owed to the City for prior months and even years of charges. Staff's position is that Council should adopt the policy as presented above. This policy will apply to the 423 accounts identified by OK & Associates as well as others in the future. [C:\..AGENDA S\031996.D551 MEMORANDUM TO: Fellow Members of the City Council FROM: Mayor Conner and Councilmember Cornett Council Ad hoc Budget Committee DATE: March 19, 1996 RE: Mid -Year Budget Review for 1995-96 and Direction on 1996-97 RECOMMENDATION: It is respectfully requested that the City Council receive the midyear budget review for fiscal year 1995-96 and the line -by-line revenue and expenditure budget adjustments as detailed below. It is also requested that the Council review the Council Budget Committee's recommendation for the 1996-97 fiscal year budget compilation. BACKGROUND: At the January 9, 1996 meeting, the City Council voted (4-0) in favor of adopting the 1995-96 fiscal year budget. In the weeks leading up to.that meeting, the Ad hoc Council Budget Committee spent numerous hours analyzing the estimated revenues and expenditures for the first five months of the fiscal year. The Budget Committee made adjustments to the budget document accordingly, Thus, the midyear review of the budget, which covers seven months, has been largely covered by the earlier work of the Budget Committee. REVENUES A Revenue Report is provided for the first seven months of the 1995-96 fiscal year in Attachment A of this Memorandum. The Revenue Report includes the actual revenue. received through January 31, 1995 by each fund of the City. The report provides a basic analysis of the projected revenues as follows: 1) CURRENT: This section of the Revenue Report provides three columns which show the one -month (January 1996) estimate for each revenue line -item; the one -month actual revenues received by line -item; and a %REV column which calculates the percentage of estimated compared to actual for the current month of January. AGE9DA51911996.91YE 2) YEAR-TO-DATE: This section of the report is similar to the CURRENT (January 1996) section and also provides three columns. These columns include a seven -month estimate for each revenue line -item; the seven -month actual revenues received by line -item; and a %REV column which calculates the percentage of actual to estimate through the first seven months of the fiscal year. 3) ANNUAL ESTIMATE: This section shows the total annual revenue budget projection for each revenue by line -item. 4) UNREALIZED BALANCE: This section of the report shows the difference between the YEAR-TO-DATE Actual compared to the ANNUAL ESTIMATE. Theoretically, the YEAR-TO-DATE Actual in each revenue line -item for every fund should be at 58%. However, there are some revenues that are received at various intervals throughout the fiscal year. The main area where revenue estimate adjustments are required is in the construction permit and plan check revenues of the General Fund. Although some General Fund revenues are revised upward. the net adjustment is a net decrease to General Fund revenues of $58,227. A Revenue Adjustment worksheet is provided in Appendix B of this Memorandum to show the revenue line -item adjustments. The last column of the spreadsheet in Appendix B represents the Budget Committee's recommendations for revenue estimate adjustments for the balance of the 1995-96 fiscal year. EXPENDITURES In Appendix C of this Memorandum, Council will find a seven -month Detail Budget Report which provides a budget analysis similar to the Revenue Report included in Appendix A. Based on this seven -month Detail Budget Report, a spreadsheet has been provided in Appendix D with the line -by-line expenditure budget adjustments required for the remainder of 1995-96. Some of the. budget adjustments included are required due to underestimated expenditures and extraordinary items not anticipated when the 1995-96 fiscal year budget was prepared in June 1995. The total expenditure budget adjustments equal $129,416. Of these, $64,071 represent expenditure budget increases in the General Fund. The expenditures for weed abatement costs for the remainder of the 1995-96 fiscal year will be paid out of the Fund 65 trust fund; As weed abatement expenditures are incurred, a billing will be generated to the property owner and a corresponding receivable will be established in Fund 65. When the property owner pays for the weed abatement work paid by the City, the receivable will be reversed and the cash in Fund 65 replenished. 0 31995 NYB7 To assist the Council in reviewing the seven -month Detail Budget Report included in Appendix C, a spreadsheet which reconciles this report to the adopted 1995-96 budget is included in Appendix F. As shown in Appendix F, the Council's adopted 1995-96 budget is accurately reconciled to the Budget Report as presented. FISCAL IMPACT: The net adjustment to estimated revenues and expenditures cause an impact to the June 30, 1996 fund balance reserve figures provided to Council when the 1995-96 fiscal year budget was adopted: The revised total General Fund fund balance projection, after the recommended revenue and expenditure adjustments are included, totals $211,529 as of June 30, 1996. The revised Fund Balance Analysis is included in Appendix E of this Memorandum. The City Council should be aware that there are additional financial contingencies that the City Budget Committee will be discussing in the coming weeks. These will include further changes to the budget to achieve more conservative financial management policies for the City. For now, these budget adjustments are required to meet the spending levels of the City, NEXT STEPS: The 1996-97 fiscal year budget preparation is already underway., A tentative budget calendar is attached in Appendix G for Council's review. REVENUE ESTIMATES The key variable in the adoption of the final 1996-97 budget will be the revenue projections. Staffs approach to forecasting 1996-97 revenues for all funds will be the percentage adjustment approach. The prior year's actual receipts will be adjusted up or down by a percentage based on expected economic conditions in 1996-97. The following are some examples of the economic variables that will be used to forecast revenues under the percentage method: Property Tax: Expected inflation and population will be used to determine the growth rate for 1996-97. These assumptions will be compared with the revenue estimates prepared by Caren & Cone, the City's property tax consultants. Sales Tax: Expected inflation and population will be used to determine the growth rate for 1996-97. These assumptions will be compared with the revenue estimates prepared by MRC, the City's sales tax consultants. Franchise Fees: Expected utility company revenues will be used. Business license: Economic growth will be used. . AGENDAS 1031996.HYB) Permit Revenue: Population and economic growth will be used. State Subventions (Motor Vehicle License, Gas Tax, etc.): Population growth will be used; per capita numbers are provided by the State Department of Finance. Tax Increment: Expected inflation and population will be used to determine the growth rate for 1996-97. These assumptions will be compared with the revenue estimates prepared by Coren & Cone, the City's property tax consultants. Enterprise Revenue: Expected population and housing development will be used. Revenue estimates are expected from staff by mid April. EXPENDITURE ESTIMATES The Council Budget Committee recommends that all preliminary Departmental budgets be prepared and include only those operating costs necessary to provide "basic" service to the residents of San Jacinto. A separate fund should be established by the City to meet future citizen requests for projects and to build up the City's General Fund reserves. Also, a five-year financial plan will be prepared to better understand the 1996-97 and future year's impact from the funding of contingent liabilities (i.e., liability insurance, worker's comp, compensated absences, etc.) and capital asset depreciation. . AGZNDA31Q31996.NY81 . AGENDAS \03199 b.HY131 APPENDIX A 5 EPAREIT03/1?-'996. 2009:34 City of San, '-cinto OGRAM: 61125 REVENUE E 1 ACCOUNTING PERIOL (71996 ty uf San Jacinto INLI 610 GENERAL FUND ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION •^ •-, •._ ^-• i00 10/ 01 10 01 20 01 30 01 41 01 60 pi 65 01 4 301 444414,14.4-4w44 CURRENT ********** ******** YEAR-TO-DATE ******** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ESTIMATED ACTUAL %REV ESTIMATED ACTUAL 'REV ESTIMATE BALANCE , ., . ......._ . REVENUE tAXES PROP.TAX/CY/S/U SALES & USE TAXES TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAXES FRANCHISE'S BUSINESS LICENSES PROPERTY TRANSFER TAXES REVENUE 334 raxEs 303 REVENUE 02 10 ANIMAL LICENSES 02 12 BICYCLE LICENSES 02 21 CONSTRUCTIUN PERMITS 02 37 MODITE HOME: FERMI:I/DEER. 02 38 ST. 6 TROFFIG SIGN PERMIT 02 40 PUBLIC WURKS PERMITS 02 50 OTHER LICENSES 6 PERMITS 303 02 * PERMIT5 ** REVENUE 304 REVENUE 03 30 FINES/FORFEITS 03 35 PARKING CITATION., 03 * EINES 301 44 305 REVENU11. REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 04 40 RENT/CONCESS1ONS USE UF: MONEY AND PROPTkl-i 305 44 REVENUE 306 REVENUE 05 05 MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSES 05 10 HOMEOWNERS pROP. TAX REL. 47,214 37,177.60 79 330,498 52,917 46.100.00 91 370,419 693 1,929.28 264 -4,951 53,424 40,021.31 90 373,960 9,068 39,784.97 439 63,476 1,622 1,614.47 90 12,754 165,139 176,557.73 107 1,155,966 165,139 176.557.73 107 1,155,966 248 421.00 170 1,736 -0 .00 rib 12,406 11,155.10 1:1.3 07,402 061 6,939.00 791 6,049 100 .00 700 2,500 10,504.09- 740 17,500 03 .00 591 16,299 2,910.02 19 114,023 16,299 2,910.02 18 114,023 125 .00 875 2,333 2.542.00 109 16,331 2,459 2,542.00 103 17.206 2,4511 2,542.00 103 17,206 .4,080 .00 213,540. 2,958 2,522.97 85 20,706 7,036 2,522.97 36 49,266 7,079 2,522.97 36 49,266 66,542 .00 465,794 1,317 5,242.96 399 9,219 292.519.10 389.587.69 4,746.32 279,331.01 56,272.47 10,581.13 1,031,037.90 89 566,569 274,049.82 105 635,000 246,412.31 -99 .9,3I0 3,56369 74 641,085 362,753.99 89 100,910 52,537.53 83 21,865 1102E33197 89 1,981,639 950,601.20 1,031,037.80 09 1,901,639 950,601..20 1,579.00 91 2,975 1,396.00 102,06 182 100' 67,325.75 77 7,379.00 122 .00 1,611,73 27 254.40 44 91,201.98 71 01.291.89 71 .00 10,270.90 6:3 10,270.90 60 10,270.90 60 .00 17,762.92 86 17,762.92 36 17,762.82 36 149,830 10,370 1,200 30,000 1.000 195,475 195,475 1,500 26,000 29,500 29 , SOO 48,965 35,500 94,465 84,465 02,504.25 2,991.00 ' 1,200.00 25.35E3.27 745.60 114,193.12 114,193.12 1,500.00 17,729.10 190229.10 19,229.10 49,965.00 17.737.18 66,702.19 66.702.18 121,223..79 90 798,500 377,276.21 7,542.98 02 15,800 8,257.12 ___ __ REFARED• 03/13/1996. -20;09131 City of San Jacinto REVENUE REPORT [)GRAM 1 061259L PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 ity of San Jacinfo 010 GENERAL 0.646 ACCOUNT *44****14-**M CURRENT *A**A**A1KM it(**,(*itit YEAR-TO-DATE *itit***** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT , DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL %REV ESTIMATED ACTUAL %REV ESTIMATE BALANCE -------- 300 REVENUE. 366. REVENUE 05 13 TRAILER COACH FEE 17 05 29 P.0 S T 3.750 05 95 HWY CARRIERS IN-L1EU FAX 63 05 3k STATE SUPVENTIONS 71,709 306 +04• REVENUE. '71,709 309 REVENUE 06 01 PLANNINU/ZONINU/SUDDIV'SN 2.500 06 11 CONTRACTOR LICENSE VERIF. 750 06 15 SPECIAL POLICE SERV, FEE(; 2,083 06 20SEWER PERMITS 06 21 ALARM RESPON8E FEES 375 06 25 SPECIAL FIRE SERVICE ELE0 725 06 30 PLAN CHECKINO FEES 6,667 06 57 NPDEG-CSA 152 2,838 06 60 WEED 6. LOT CLEANING FEEG 1,792 06 65 VEHICLE ABATEMENT FEE6 1,250 06 FEES AND PERMIT'S 10,900 308 .>#4* REVENUE 10,900 309 REVENUE 07 01 SALE OF PROPERTY 375 9? 30 SB 90 CLAIM6 917 07 45 CONTRIBUTIONS 133 07 76 SENIOR CITIZEN/8 DONATION 0 07 SO WASTE REDUCTION/AB939 792 07 92 FEMA DRANf 5,417 07 -k Op,iC REVENUE 7,504 309 *of REVENUE 300 *004 REVLUE 310 REVENUE 310 07 96 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 09 99 OVER/SHORT 310 *14 7,504 .00 119 .00 200 200.00 312.98 8 26,250 6,266.20 24 45,000 38,733.72 972.00 1171 561 3,755.00 646 1,000 2,755.00- 6,527.04 9 501,963 430,707.95 97 960,500 421,712.05 6,527.64 9 501,963 436,787.95 87 860,500 421,712.05 5,246.42 210 17,500 23,309.77 133 30,000 6,690.23 644.52 86 5,250 3,221.23 61 9,000 5;7/0.77 1,630.26 76 14,591 13,704.90 94 25,000 11.295410 H .00 56 .00 100 100.00 6,.00 10 2,625 604.00 23 4,500 • 3,896.00 ! .1.90.00 26 5,075 11,279.00 222 6,700 2,579.00- 6.950.67 104 46,669 38,1364.07 03 80,000 41,115.93 .00 19,966 .00 34,050 34,050.00 11,060.63 662 12,544 24,005.92 191 21,500 2,505.92- .00 8,750 .00 15,000 15,000.00 26,596.90 140 132,916 115,000.09 87 227,850 112,041.11 26,596.90 140 , 132,916 115,0084E19 87 226650 1120141.11 .00 2,625 17,150.00 653 4,500 12,650.00- .00 6,419 .00 11,000 11,000.00 .00 5131 78.07 13 1,000 921.93 .00 0 .00 0 .00 .00 5,544 .00 9,500 9,500.00 .00 37,919 12,076.00 32 65,000 52,924.09 .00 53,003 29.304.07 55 91,000 61,695.93 .00 53,088 2E19 , 204 21:7,657.46 29,304.07 55 91,000 61,695.93 75 2,024,429 1,723,454.31 2,927 7.844.92 268 20.489 23,771.10 0 143.09- 0 94.25- 2,927 7,701.03 263 20,499 23,676.95 05 3,470,429 1.746.974.69 116 35,120 11.348.90 0 94.25 116 35,120 11.443,15 EPARET 03/1:7 '96. 20:09:34 City of San --.into OGRAM: GM25 REVENUE T 3 . . . . . . . ACCOUNTING PERIM:- •c/i996 tv ot 5.31) Jacinto bio DENERAL FUND ACCOUNT A4***0**** CURRENT ***m*****x. ******** YEAR-TO-DATE ******** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION EGTIMATED ACTUAL )REV ESTIMATED ACTUAL Y.REV ESTIMATE BALANCE ,_-_------___---- -- ----.. - 10 REVENUE 116 ;10 oww REVENUE 2,927 7,701.63 263 20,469 23,676.05 116 35,120 11,413.15 590 REVENUE S99 REVENUE 00 11 1NTER-FUND TRA4SFERS-IN 126.672 275,739.43 2IG 006,704 044,746.68 95 1,520,069 675,322.32 379 3444 REVENUE 126,672 275,739.43 210 886,704 04.1,746.69 95 1,520,069 675,322.32 REVENUE 126,672 275,739..43 210 ---anA;7a4-- 044,746-.60 -95 --1,570,069 675372.32 FUND TOTAL GENERAL FUND 40,003 501.090.72 11 20 2,93,621 2,591,077.04 GO 5,025,610 2,433,740.16 EPAREU 03/13/1996. 20(09:34 City of San Jacinto PAGE 4 ()GRAM: G11259L REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 tv of San Jacinto tb 611 TitLE. Mil GRANT ACCOUNT ixixtii***)rx** CURRENT ********it* ******** YEAR—TO—DATE ******** ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL. %REV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV - _ ANNUAL UNREALIZED ESTIMATE BALANCE i 00 REVENUE 07 REVENUE 06 T5 TITLE lii (RANI FUNDS 5(34 576.00 99 4,0GO 3,016.57 74 7,006 3,969.43 M7 4** REVENUE 504 576.00 99 4,000 3,016.57 74 7,006 :5,969.43 MO 1,t4A- REVENUE 504 576.00 99 4,0136 3,016.57 74 7,006 3,909.43 FUND TUTAL TITLE :[II} GRAM 504 576.00 ' 99 4,088 3,016.57 74 7,006 3,969.43 EPARHt 03/1 9620;09;;54 Clix of Sa- i ni o DORNM; GM25% REVENUE .1 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 tY uf San Jacinto vori 01l:3 WoRKMANS COMPENSATION ACCOUNT Orif******A* CURRENT *******m** ******** YEAR-TO-DATE *01****** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE SOO REVENUE SO'g REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 0 .00 0 4.231.70 0 4.231.76- 30.J 1k REVENUE 0 .00 0 4,2i.7 0 2'31770- 300 )0iii REVENUE 0 .00 0 4,231.7B 0 4,231.70- 390 REVENUE 399 " REVENUE 50 11 INTER -FUND TRANSFERS -IN 0 .U00 399 i44 REVENUE 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 390 14** REVENUE 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 FUND TOTAL WORKMANSCOMPENATION 0 .00 0 A.211.76 REPARED 03/13/1996. 20:09:31 City of San Jacinto PAGE 6 ROORAM: 011259L REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 Ilv ol San Jacinto --_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-___ UNIT 020 LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND ACCOUNT .X.A****A.**if CURRENT ****x***** *4****** YEAR -All -DATE .***4***M ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL. XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE 300 REVENUE. Job REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 0 .00 o 4.474.17 0 4.474.17- 305 *+ REVENUE 0 .00 0 4,471.17 0 4,474.17- 300 **N. REVENUE0 .00 0 4,474.17 0 4.474.17- 310 REVENUE 310 07 96 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 9.664 .00 67,640 .00 115.973 1115,9'73.00 :10 A* 9,661 .00 67,640 .00 115,973 115,973.00 310 *4* REVENUE 9,664 .00 67,640 .00 115,973 115,973.00 390 REVENUE 399 REVENUE 50 11 INTER -FUND TRANSFERS -IN 0 399 ** REVENUE 0 390 REVENUE 0 FOND TOTAL LIADILITY INSURANCE FUND 9,664 4' ) ( ) .00 .00 O J15,973.00 0 115.973.00- O 115,973.00 0 115,973.00- O 115,973.00 0 115,973.00- 67,640 120,447.17 170 115,973 4.474.17- I ' 4" EPAREO 03/1, 96. 20;09:.34 ()GRAN: UM25S. City of Sa into REVENUE .1- iv of San Jac.info 7 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 446621- (5A TX FUND - ACCOUNT A44*-M****** CURRENT ********** ******** YEAR-TO-DATE ******** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL gREV ESTIMATE - BALANCE ------- -- -_. --- __-_- i00 REVENUE 163 REVENUE 04 10 INVERESf .00 0 2,555.04 0 2t555.04- SO5 ** REVENUE 0 .00 -a 2,555.84 $06 REVENUE 05 04 601 TAX 2105 OS 06 GAS TAX 2106 05 07 OAS TAX 2107 05 08 GAS TAX 2107.5 05 1/ SD 629 - DIEFA.JM' 05 * STATE SUDVENTIONS 306 — — REVENUE 309 REVENUE 07 91 SD WI REFUND 07 92 SD 92 REFUND 07 * MISC.: REVENUE 300 *4 REVENUE 300 it** REVENUE FUND TOTAL OAS TAX FUND 11,534 23,015.37 207 00,738 83,025.31 104 ' 13E3,407 8,388 15,366.10 103 58,716 56,493,00 96 100,660 16,333 31,269041 210 114,331 117,831.55 103 195,996 417 .00 2,919 „t, 000.00- -171-- ------7,000- O .00 0 .00 0 54,581;69 -"- 44,166•20 78,164.45 00 36,672 73,450.08 200 256,704 263,150.66 103 440,063 176,912,34 - 36,672 73,450•0200 --256070AT 263,150.66 103 440,063 1/6,912-.34 O .00 0 .00 0 0 () .00 0 .00 0 .00 .00 0 .00 O .00 .00 - 0 .00 36,672 73,450.00 200 256,704 2650706050 104 440,063 174t356.50 . 36,6/2 73.150.00 200 256.704 265,706.50 104 440,063 174,356.50 EPAREU 03/13/1996. 20:09:34 City of San Jacinto OGRAM1 9/1259L CVENUE REPORT PAGE ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 tv ot San Jacinto ND 622 MEASURE A — OAS TAX FUND ACCOUNT AWWW****** CURRENT ********** ******** YEAR-JO—DATE AWA11**WA ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION EGTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL )(REV . . _..._._ ANNUAL UNREALIZED ESTIMATE BALANCE i00 REVENUE iii:, REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 498 .00 3,406 13,905.21 399 5,974 7,931.21— ** REVENUF. 199 .00 3,4136 13,905.21 399 5,974 7,931.21— SO6 REVENUE 05 20 0AS TAX — MEASURE A 23,549 74,034.25 314 164,043 199,070.47 115 292,509 • 92,717.59 $06 ** REVENUE 23,549 74,034.25 314 164,943 109,970..42 115 292.589 92,717.59 .___. 507 REVENUE 06 76 1STE0 GRANT 23,593 .00 165,091 .00 203,000 203,000.00 307 AW REVENUE 23,593 .00 165,081 .00 283,000 2E33000.00 300 w,u4. REVENUE. 47,630 74,034.25 155 333,410 203,775.63 61 571,562 367,706.37 FUND UTTAL MEASURE A GAG TAX FUND 47,630 74,034,25 155 333,410 203,775.63 61 571,562 367,706,37 I• ;EPARED 03/1'' 1'96. 20;09:34 MERAM: om2n City of Sal, ,inio REVENUE 9 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 iv of San Jacinio iNti61,A TKAFFIC SAFETY FUND ACCOUNT *.4******** CURRENT ********** *4**,4**,4* YEAR-TO—DATE ***K0,*" ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL %REV ESTIMATED ACTUAL. XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE - • -- -- — _______________________________ 300 REVENUE RE:VENU6 03 10 VEHICLE CODE FINES 1,457 1,237.35 85 10,199 10,657.21 105 17,485 6,827.79 1,457 1,237.35 05 10199 - 10,657.21 105 17,405 6,12 79- 305 REVENUE -- 04 10 INTEREST 0 .00 0 52.77 0 52.77- 305 *m REVENUE 0 .00 0 52.77 0 52.77- 300 i*,44 REVENUE 1,457 1.237.35 05 10,199 10,709.90 105 17.405 6,775.02 FUND TOTAL TRAFFIC :SAFETY FUND 1,457 1,737.35 05 10,199 I0,709.98 105 17,485 6,775.02 3 EPARED 03/13/1996. 20;09;3/ OORAM: 0142,791. City of San Jacinto RE'.VENUE REPORT PAGE 10 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 tY Ot 8an Jacinto IND 025 LIBUTINO MAINTENANCE FUND ACCOUNT ACCDONT DESCRIPTION 509 REVENUE 502 REVENUE 06 S5 LLMD ASSESSMENT 06 56 ZONE LIONTINO/SIONALS 06 SB ZONE D PARKS 06 MISE REVENUE 302 ).1* REVENUE 300 #ffif REVENUE 390 REVENUE 399 REVENUE 50 11 INTER —FUND TRANSFERS —IN 399 REVENUE 390 wssi REVENUE FUND TOTAL LIGHT:ENS MAINTENANCE FUND CURRENT **M**%**** ***Mit*** YEAR-TO-DATE K****14** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE 55.348 0 0 55.348 55,340 55.340 3.750 3.750 3,750 59.098 366,313.65 702 .00 .00 3110.313.65 702 380,313.65 702 300.313.65 702 .00 .00 .00 388,313.65 657 387,436 0 307,136 387,436 3137.436 26,250 26,250 26,250 413,686 3'73,030.13 96 .00 .00 373,030..13 96 373,030.13 96 373,030.13 96 661.180 0 664'100 664,180 664,180 22,500.00 86 45,000 22,500.00 86 45,000 22.500.00 B6 45,000 395,530.13 96 709,180 291,149.67 .00 .00 2910149.67 291,149.07 29 1 149 .8 22,500.00 22,500.00 :?2.500.06 313,649.87 EPAREP 03/1,996. 20:09:34 OORAM: 8M25. RrUENUF ,r City of San:-1-.cinto 11 ACCOUNTINC PER10T ..,7/1996 19 of San Jacinto 028 PARK DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNT .k46**ftif***11- CURRENT ********** ******** YEAR-TO-DATE ******** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL %REV ESTIMATED ACTUAL %REV ESTIMATE BALANCE - -------___--_--____________--------------------- -------- . -- - . - - - . 00 REVENUE 42 kOkNuE 06 E10 STATE PARK GRANT 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 ;02 its REVENUE 0 .00 0 ;00 ,00 ;05 REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 1,609 .00 11,263 5,048,43 - 45 19,305 - 14e256-,57 ---- 505 PH4 REVENUE 1,609 .00 11,263 5,048.43 45 19,305 14.256.57 508 ELVENUE 06 70 PARE DEVEEOPEMENT FEES 0 11.555.26 0 A4,101.40 0 11,181.46- . — 308 A* REVENUE 0 11.555.28 0 14,101,40 0 14,181,40- 309 REVENUE 06 00 STATE; PARK GRANT 3,250 .00 . 22.750 39,000.00 171 39,000 .00 09 *86 REVENUE 3,250 .00 22,750 39,000.00 171 39,000 .00 300 *4* REVENUE 4,059 11,555.28 230 34,013 58,229,91 171 50,305 75.09 FUND TOTAL. PARK DEVELOPMENT 4,659 11.555.20 230 34,013 56,229.91 171 50,305 75.09 i:EPARED 03/13/1.996. 20:09:34 City of San Jacinto PAGE 12 400RAM: GM259L. REJENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 Ity of San Jacinto _ • +.^.. .• •IND 029 CDB6 ACCOUNT 4.1.**.t***4* CURRENT ***itttlem**x ****A-*** YEAR—TO—DATE NM41***14* ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL '(REV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE 300 REVENUL 307 REVENUE 05 92 PROCEEDS OF HOME GRANT 49,996 .467 *34 REVENUE 19,996 300 REVENNF 49.996 FUND TOTAL CDBO 49.996 .00 . 00 . 00 .00 349,972 349,972 349,972 349,972 .00 .00 .00 .00 599,946 599,946 599,946 599,946 599,916.0G 599,946.00 599,946.00 EFARELI 03/1,996. 20:09;34 :DORAN: 0M2t Ci ty of S into REVENUE 'Cr Ft777.„. 13 ACCOUNTING PERTOL_1/1996 ty of Gan Jacinto )1,16.1512:-ARKWAi' DEVELOPMENT FUND ACCOUNT ..x******** CURRENT ****W***** ******** YEAR-TO-DATE ******** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL )(REV ESTIMATED ACTUAL %REV ESTIMATE ' BALANCE SOO REVENUE REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 1,609 i05 41+ REVENUE 1,609 300 *** REVENUE 1,609 FUND TOTAL PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT FUND 1,609 .00 . 00 ,00 11,263 6,323.34 56 19,305 12.981.66 11,263' 6,323.34 56— .19,305 11,263 6,323,34 56 19,305 12,981.66 11,263 6,323.34 56 19,305 12,981.66 9 EPARED 03/13/1996. 20;09;34 Cityi of San Jacinto PAGE 14 DORAMi 0M2S9L REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNliNG PERIOD 07/1996 Iv of San Jaciolo 446 035 C.F.D. ACCOUNT .fitAft******* CURRENT ********** ******** YEAR—TO—DATE ******** ANNUAL UNREALIZED . • ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ActuAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE - •— - - -- __ ____ _ _ _, _ __ _ .„. SOO REVENUE kbiL140E 06 54 PROP. ASSMI.FOR POL./FIRE 302 H* REVENUE 1,022 6,715.34 657 7,154 1,022 6.715.34 657 7,154 6,715.34 94 22,259 5,543.66 6.715.34 94 12,259 5,543:6 505 REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 0 .00 0 245.40 0 245.40— REVENUE 0 .00 0 245.4E1 300 '-4x REVENUE 1,022 6.715.34 657 7,154 6,960,02 97 12,259 5,290.10 FUND TOTAL C.F.D. -44 1,022 6,715.34 657 7,154 6,960.02 97 12.259 5,2w4;ia - EPARED 03/1/ T96. 20:0T:34 City of Boo into DORAN: RCVENUE ACCOUNTING FERIOC•...;..1/1996 VY Of San JaCillf0 ND 036 ACCOUNT ACCOUNT 40****it*** CIARRENT'********** ******** YEAR—TD—DATE ********* ANNUAL UNREALIZED DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE ------------- i00 REVENUE 162 q:VENUE 06 ti4 PROP. ASSMT.FOR POL./FIRE 3,946 23,661.26 600 27,622 23,661.26 06 47,349 23,607.74 502 31.3 REVENUE 3,946 23,661.26 600 27622 23,661.26 06 47,349 23,607-74 SO5 REVENUE — . 04 10 INTEREST 0 .00 0 4,006.97 0 4“306:97- 50 REVENUE 0 .00 0 4,806.97 0 4,806.97- 300 H** REVENUE 3,946 23, 661 26 400 27,622 20,468,23 103 47,349 10,000.77 FUND TOTAL C.F.D. 3,946 23,661.26 600 27,622 20,468.23 103 47,349 10,000.77 EPARED 03/13/1996. 20:09:34 City, of San Jacinto :00RAM: ON259L REVENUE REPORT RAGE i6 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 t y a t Sa n Ja c i n I. o . IN D 937 (1.1'-- . D . 4,•3 ACCOUNT ..44**m****14 CURRENT *******mitm outoNom*oi.i. YEAR—TO—DATE ******** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT • DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE _ ------------------- 300 REVENUE 392 REVENUE 06 *A PROP. ASSNI.FOR POL./FIRE 7,603 10,136.113 633 53,221 40,136.16 90 91,239 43,102,02 302 *44- REVENUE 7,603 40,136.10 633 53,221 305 REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 305 *4 REVENUE 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 300 hiiN REVENUE 7,603 40,136.10 633 :53#221 40,136.10 90 91,239 43,102.02 FUND TOTAL C.F.1:. 43 7,603 40,136.10 633 53.221 40,136.10 90 91,239 43.102.02 40,136.10 90 91,239 43.192.T32- EPAREO 03/1496. 20;09;34 City of San into °GRAN% 0M25' REVENUE T ACCOUNTING PERIOD ty of San Jac:into 146 038 UNDERGROUND UTILIFY ACCOUNT AAX4t****** CURRENT ***4****o** ****ft*** YEAR —TO —BATE 44i******* ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE 5 MO REVENUE :05 REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 688 .00 6,216 6,702.68 106 10,660 3,957.32 f05 *o* REVENUE cion .00 6,21. 6,707.6E3 100 10,660 MB REVENUE 06 63 DEVELOPER FEES 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 SO6 KM REVENUE 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 500 i44of REVENUE 00B .00 6,216 6.702.60 100 10,660 3,957.32 .IND TOTAL UNDERGROUND UTILITY 800 .00 6,216 6,702.60 100 10,660 3,957.32 'EPARED 03/13/1996. 20,09:34 City of San Jacinto FADE 10 ;00RAM: SM259L REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING FERIDD 07/1996. itv of San Jacinto .446 039 FLOUR CONTROL, ACCOUNT 14*******.1* CURRENT *****4**** *******1* YEAR-TO-DATE *A-RMA*A* ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV 300 REVENUE 305 REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 4,522 .)4 REVENUE 4,522 308 REVENUE OS 65 DEVELOPER FEES 1,515 300 if* REVENUE 1.515 300 XliN REVENUE 6,037 FUND TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL 6,037 .00 • () ( .00 .00 . ()0 . 00 ESTIMATE BALANCE --------------------- 31,654 13,791,27 44 54,260 40,468.73 31,654 13,791.27 44 54,260 40,460.73 10.605 5,750.40 54 18,175 12,424.60 10,605 5,750.40 54 18,175 12,424.60 42,2SY 19,541467 46 72, 435 52t093433 42,259 19,541.67 46 72,435 52,093,33 EPAREI- • 20109:31 i kY cfSan j Tito flORAM: 8112'.3 REVENUE A 19 ACCOUNTING PERIOD.'07/1996 tv oi' Sa» Jacinto WI 041 TRAFFIC 8I8NALIZATION ACCOUNT AAAKAAAAAX CURRENT AN******** ANAAAAAA YEAR—TO—DATE 01******* ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE .-------------------------_____--------- -- --- —. -- - _-. -- . -. — — 00 REVENUE io REAA:NOE 04 10 INTEREST 2,142 505 *)4 REVENUE 2,142 307 06 './6 REVENUE ISTEA GRANT S07 AM REVENUE .00 14,994 11,685.44 78 25,700 14,014.'3-6 .00 14,994 11,6E15.44 7B 25,700 14,01-4.56 16,000 .00 112,000 .00 192,000 192,000.00 16,000 .00 112,000 .00 192,000 192,000.00 308 REVENUE 08 26 SIONALIZATION IMPROVEMENT 0 308 *tt REVENUE 0 300 *4* REVENUE 18,142 FUND TOTAL TRAFFIC SIONALTZATION .00 .00 0 .00 .00 0 .00 0 .00 1.7;994 11,685:44 -9 217.700 206,-014.5-6- .00 126,994 11,685.14 9 217,700 206,014.56 EPAKED 03/13/J9Y6. 20:091341 OGRAM: S11259L REVENUE REPORT City of San Jacinto PAGE 20 ty of San Jacioto 042 iA.b. B7-1 DEBT SERVICE ACCOUNT *********A CURRENT *MA******* ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 YEAR-TO-DTE ******** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL %REV ESTIMATED ACTUAL REV ESTIMATE BALANCE ..... ... _ . . _ . .... .... 00 REVENUE REVENUE 06 53 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1,67-1 2.500 .00 17,500 .00 30,000 30,000.00 06 54 PROP. ASSM1iFOR poL./FIRE 0 1.1,035.36 0 15.035.36 0 15,035.36- 06 X MIC REVENUE 2,500 15,035.36 601 17,500 15,035436 86 30,000 14,964.64 102 2,500 15,035.36 601 17,500 15,035.36 06 30,000 14,964.64 100 N-X-.* REVENUE 2,500 1'5,03.36 601 17,500 115,035.36 86 30,000 14,964.64 FUND TOTAL A.U. 07-1 Dna SERVTEE 2,100 15,035.36 601 11,500 15,035.36 06 130 , 000 14,96,64 EPARLD 03/1'96. 20:09t34 OORAMI 6025 City, of Sat,' 'tinto REVENUE 21 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 ty of San Jocinto iND 043 ASSESSMENT DIST. NO 91-1 ACCOUNT ********** CURRENT 011tARAA**MA* ****0%** YEAR—TO—DATE ****A**m ANNUAL UNREALIZED 2 1 ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL ;REV ESTIMATED ACTUAL %REV ESTIMATE BALANCE i00 REVENUE {MI , REVENUE 06 52 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 06 51 PR0P. AS1M1.FOR POL./EIRE 6,877 10,74E1.55 273 413,139 10,74E1.55 39 82,520 63,771.45 06 57 ASSESSMENT PAYOFFS 0 .0G —0 .00 .0 ,00 06 * MISC REVENUE 6,677 18,740.55 273 40,139 10,740.55 39 02,520 63,771.45 502 ** REVENUE 6,077 10,710.55 273 48,139 10,740.55 39 02.520 63.771.45 SO5 REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 125 .00 075 2,205.14 261 1,500 705.14— 305 - REVENUE 125 .00 875 2,205.14 261 1.500 785.14- 309 REVENUE i 09 92 BOND PROCEEDS 692 .00 4,844 .00 0,301 0,301,00 r 309 ** REVENUE 692 .00 4,844 .00 13,301 8,301.00 300 *** REVENUE 7,694 113,740.55 244 53,059 21,033.69 39 92.321 71.207.31 390 REVENUE 399 REVENUE - . 50 11 INFER-FuN0 TRANSFERS —IN 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 , 399 9t.i. REVENUE 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 390 H.N-4 REVENUE. 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 FUND TOTAL ASSESSMEN1 DIST, NO 94—A 7,694 113.748.55 244 53,050 21,033.69 39 92,321 71.207.31 PARED 03/13/1996. 2009:34 DORAN: 0M259L Elly, of San Jacinto PAGE 22 REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 tv ot Siill Jacinto -------- - ND 044 C.F.D. 41 - DEBT SERVICE ACCOUNT M%******** CURRENT ********** ******** YEAR-TO-DATE *****44** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL %REV ESTIMATED ACTUAL %REV ESTIMATE ALANCE • 00 REVENUE 01 TAXES 06 56 MOPERTY ASSESSMENT 0 4,233.04 oi. *4' TAXES 0 4,733.04 °4"/ N** REVENUE 0 4,233,04 FUND TOTAL C.F.D. 41 - DED1 SERVICE 0 4,233.04 0 0 6 4,233.04 0 4.233.04- r, 4,733.04 0 4,233.04- 4,233.04 0 4.233.04- 4,233.04 0 4,233.04- :RED 03/1.7-'1996. 207.09t34 City of MORAN! 0M2!' REVENUE, 23 ACCOUNTING PER100,.......07/1996 itY of Sao JaLinto iNii 046 C.F.D. 4,2 - DEBI. SERVICE ACCOUNT -..,********* CURRENT ********** ******** YEAR-TO-DATE ******** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMAtED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE 300 REVENUE. 301 TAXES 06 56 PROPERTY ASSESSMENT 183,466 419,916,60 229 1,264,402 426,989.76 33 2,201,829 1,774,039.24 06 57 ASSESSMENT PAYOFF 0 25,782.64 0 370521.94 0 37'521.94- 06 * REVENUE 163,406 445•699.44 243 1,264,102 469,511.10 36 2,2010029 1,737,317.36 301 ** TAXES 103.406 445,699.44 243 1,284,402 464,511.70 36 2,201,629 1,737,317.30 SCRE- - - REVENUE 06 57 ASSESSMEN1 PAYOFFS 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 302 ** REVLNUL 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 305 REVENUE 04 10 INTE1ES4 233 .00 1,61J- 5;961.45 -367 - - -20600 30101.45- 1 305 ** REVENUE 233 .00 1,631 50961.45 367 2,600 30101.45- 309 REVENUE 07 91 SD 91 REFUND 0 .00 0 .00 o .00 - SD 92 REEDND 0 .00 0 :00 0- .00 07 4,. MISC REVENUE 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 309 ** REVENUE 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 300 )i--4k REVENUE 163,719 445.699.44 243 1,266,033 470,493.15 37 2,204,629 1,734,135.65 310 REVENUE 310 07 93 E.M.U.L. 3,173 .00 07 96 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE, 0 .00 0? * #34 MISC REVENUE 310 *** REVENUE 3,1./3 3,173 3,173 -FOND TOTAL C.F.D. 42 -- DEFT SERVICE 106,692 .00 .00 .00 445,699.44 22,211 .00 38,075 36,075000 ..,-. - 0 15.50 0 22,211 15.50 30,075 36,059.54 22,211 15.50 38,075 36,059.50 22,211 15.50 30,075 36,059.54 239 1,300,244- 470,546.65 34 ' 'ain12,764 -4,7724195-0'35 :EPARED 03/13/1996. 20:09:34 City of San Lacintn PAGE 24 MORAN: 814259L REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTIN6 RERIOU 07/1996 tv of San Jaciirto JNII 050 WATER FUND ACCOUNT 4********* CURRENT *********x ******** YEAR—TO—DATE ******** ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION EGTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ANNUAL UNREALIZED ESTIMATE BALANCE 500 REVENUE . iii REVENUE , 04 10 INTEREST 294 .00 2,050 797.90 39 3,533 2,735.10 505-- *g REVENUE 294 .00 7,050 797.90 39 3,533 2,735.10 306 REVENUE 08 20 CONNECTION FEE 8 206 50.00 24 1,456 3,437.00 236 2.500 937.00— 09 10 WATER USAGE 98,333 139,366.34 142 6880331 027,867.15 120 1,190,000 352,132.65 , 09 70 WATER TURN—ONS 200 .00 1,456 .00 2,500 2.500.00 09 ,h REVENUE 98.54.1 1.5Y,360.34 1.41. 609,707 027,1167.15 120 1,102,500 354,632.05 308 ** REVENUE 9E1,749 139,410.34 141 691,243 931,304.15 120 1,185,000 353,695.65 300 *.4. REVENUE 99,043 139,419.34 14.1. 693,301. 832,102.05 120 1,109,533 356,430.95 310 REVENUE 310 07 95 UTILITY COLLECTIONS 0 .00 ' 0 .00 0 .00 07 96 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 0 .00 0 96.72 0 96.72— , 0? * MISC REVENUE: . 0 .00 0 99.72 0 99.72— i 310 m* 0 .00 0 96.72 0 98,72- 310---- REVENUE 0 .00 0 90.72 0 90,72— : FUND TOTAL WATER FUND 99,013 139,410.34 141 693,301 032,200.77 120 1,160.533 356,332.23 IIEPARED 03/1" 996. 2009:34 MORAN: OM25 City of Sajl,'- -into REVENUE" .T 25 ACCOUNTING PERIOD-67/1996 i ol San Jaciulo jail 0...1 WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT - - - ACCOUNT *m*** CURRENT **%******* ******** YEAR-TO-DATE ****14*** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION EGTIMD ATEACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL. XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE 300 REVENUE 3-05 REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 0 .00 0 3,696.02 0 3.696.02- 305 +4* REVENUE 0 .00 0- 3,696.02 308 REVENUE 08 27 WATER CAPITAL INPROVEMENT 233 .00 1,631 1,900.00 117 ' 2,000 900.00 308 %,4 REVENUE 233 .00 1,631 1,900.00 117 2,1300 900.00 300 .00-o- REVENUE 233 .00 1,631 5,596.02 313 2,000 2,796.02- FUND 101 AL. WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 233 .00 1,631 5,596.02 343 2,000 2,796.02- i:EZPARED 03/13/1996. 2009:34 City of Si Jacinto PAGE 26 AJGRAM: 9M259L REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 it.? of San Jacinto UND 055 SEWER MAINT & DEVELOPMENT ACCOUNT m********* CURRENT ********** ,4******** YEAR—TO—DATE *4****** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE 300 305 04 10 305 4* 300 07 30 REVENUE REVENUE INTEREST 257 REVENUE 257. .00 1,799 4,657.66 259 3,088 1,569066-- .00 1,799 4,657.66 259 3,006 1,566- 17,041 24,962.37 139 124,897 158,963.01 127 214,095 REVENUE ,.. _ • 11,1141 24,862.37 139 5. ...,... ....... 124,907 158,963.01 127 ,.._ 214,095 309 REVENUE 07 90 OTHER REVENUE .1 .00 501 .00 1,000 1,000.00 309 4** REVENUE 03 .00 501 .00 1,000 1,000.00 300 'Yr** R EVE NuE 10,181 24,362.31 137 127,267 1630620.67 129 219,193 54,562.33 FUND TOTAL SEWER MAIN1 & DEVELOPMENT 10.101 24.062.31 131 127,267 :63,620.67 129 218,183 54,562.33 REVENUE .SEWER MAINTENANCE FEU; 55,131.99 55,131.99 :EPARtu 03/litt996, 20;09:34 CIty of San ,1=rinto :OCTRANI SM25REVENUE ' r ty of San Jacinto F'Ar.W... 27 AECOUNTING FERIOI 71996 06.L ASSET FOREEITURE/BEIZURE ACCOUNT ACCOUNT UESCRIPTIUN *44**X****0 CURRENT ********** *M****** YEAR—TO—DATE *10****** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ESTIMATED ACTUAL Y.REV ESTIMATED ACTUAL gREV ESTIMATE BALANCE 500 REVENUE 304 REVENUE OS 81 ASSET SEIZURES/FINES 5,000 .00 35,000 24,221.16 69 60.000 35.778.04 08 82 ASSET SEIZURES —FEDERAL 0 793.52 0 9,115.68 0 9,115.613- 08 A REVENUE 5,000 793.52 16 35.000 33,336.134 95 60,000. 26,663.16 304 -NN REVENUE 5,000 793.52 16 35,000 33,336.84 95 60,000 26.663.16 305 REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 0 .00 0 136.35 0 136.35- 305 REVENUE 0 .00 0 136.35 0 136.35- 306 REVENUE -----69 1..(j1. o .00 .00 306 Ti.Ti REVENUE 0 .00 0 .00 0 300 *AA REVENUE 5,000 793.52 16 35,000 33,473.19 96 60,000 390 REVENUE 399 REVENUE 50 11 INTER —FUND TRANSFERG—TN 0 .00 399 iTit. REVENUE 0 .00 N04' REVENUE 0 .00 FUND TOTAL ASSET FORFEITURE/SEIZURE: 5p000 793452 0 16 35,000 . 00 26.526.01 .00 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 — 0 .00 33,173.19 96 60,000 26,526.81 iEPAREO 03/13/1996. 20:09:34 Lity of San —Jacinto PACE 213 i0ORAM: 0M259L REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 ity of San TaLinto LIND 062 1/2X SALES TAX FUND ACCOUNT Art*******0 CURRENT it*****m*** ******** YEAR —ill —DATE ******** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE 300 REVENUL 301 TAXES 01 21 1/2X SALES TAX 6,1333 6,517.29 95 47,031 42,241.71 Oa e2,000 39,758.29 301 liw TAXES 6,033 6,517.29 95 47,031 42,241.71 00 82,000 39,758.29 300 yeiot REVENUE 6,833 6.517,29 95 47.031 42.241.71 88 02,000 39,750.29 FUND TOTAL 1/2X SALES lAX FUND 6,033 6,517.29 95 47,831 12,241,71 08 02,000 39,750.29 EPARE..1 03/1996. 200934 orir-Ahis (3112r, REVENUE T 'Ts" oi thiol Jacinto City of irin P"-- 29 ACCOUNTING PERIOT. ..,71996 ---- -------- ---- ND 063 AIR NUALITY IMPROVEMENT ACCOUNT *A******** CURRENT *N**%***%* ******** YEAR —TO —BATE ******** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL %REV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE 00 REVENUE t)b REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 292 .00 2,044 1,064.03 91 3,500 1,635,97 605 A4 REVENUE 292 .00 2,044 1,064.03 91 3,500 1,635.97 • 400 .)k* REVENUE 292 .00 2,041 1,864.03 91 3,500 1,635,97 SIO REVENUE S10 ---66 .--7-4 - AIR NUALITY IMPROVEMENT 2,070 ,00 6,3563,013 44 .24,935— ;10 2,07O .00 14,546 6,350,00 44 24,93S 510 4*4 REVENUE 2,070 .00 14,546 6,350.00 44 24,935 FliNiI 16TAL AIR OUALITY IMPROVEMENT 2,370 .00- 16,590 8,222.11- 50 28,435 101.576,92 18,576.92 —2072127E39 EPARED 03/13/1996. 20:09:34 City of Sdn Jacinto PAGE .30 OMAN; GM2591 REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 fY of San Jacinto --__--------- ND 065 TRUST FUND ACCOUNT ACCOUNT 001,i******* CURRENT ifiut.****.*** it** YFAR—ID—DAIE ******.** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE 10 REVENUE 40 08 68 SMIP FEES 0 141.n6 0 112.71 0 112.71— AO 44, 0 141;56 0 112.71 0 112..11- 110 ..*/. REVENUE 0 141.56 0 112.71 0 112.71— FUND TOTAL TRUST fUNO ACCOUNT 0 141.56 0 112.71 0 112.71— EPARED 03/1'? ',96. 20:09;31 City of San -into JORAM: 01125 REVENUE i ACCOUNTING FERIOU t.0e11996 tY of San -Itittinto ND 066 RECYCLING TRUST FUND ACCOUNT *A******** CURRENT *I41******** ******** YEAR-TO-DATE *******,t ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL 'XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE 00 REVENUE bt5 REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 450 .00 3,206 693.37 22 5,500 4,006.63 05 44.* REVENUE 450 .00 3,206 693.37 22 5,500 -4000'S-0-63 - 06 REVENUE 00 66 RECYCLING DASE FEES 29,950. 43,253,47 144 209,706 242,061.96 116 359,500 116,630.04 OH 67 RECYCLIND OPTION-L. FEES :1,250 .00 130750 .00 15,000 15,000.00 - - 06 44 REVENUE 31,206 43,253.47- 19 210,456 2420E161.96 111 374,500 131;630.04 06 *4 REVENUE 31,2013 43,253.47 139 216,456 242,661.96 III 374,500 131,638.04 MO X** REVENUE 31,666 13,253.47 137 221,662 243,555.33 110 300,000 136,444.67 ._ . FUND TOTAL RECYCLINS MUS1 F0130 31,666 43,253.47 137 221.662 213,555.33 110 3000000 136.414.61 :EPAREO 04/13/19964 20;09;34 City of San Jacinto PAGE 32 :DORAN: 6W2591.. RE1OENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 t9 of San Jaciolo ND 067 FIRE MITIGATION ACCOUNT A4******** CURRENT ********** ******** YEAR-10-DATE **N***** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL %REV ESTIMATED ACTUAL Y.REV ESTIMATE BALANCE ------------------ 500 305 04 10 REVENUE REVENUE INTEREST 305 hki. REVENUE 300 REVENUE. 08 65 DEVELOPER FEES 508. *ff REVENUE: SOO ....A REVENUE FUND TOTAL FIRE MITIGATION 507 507 .00 3,549 1,629.33 46 6,085 4,45.67 .00 3,549 1,629.23 46 6.085 4.457 2,549 12,605.22 495 17,843 21.095.20 123 30.592 0,696.00 2.549 12.605.22 495 17,043 21,095.20 123 30,592 8,696.80 12,605.22 413 21.392 23.524.53 110 .36 t f.)77 13.152.47 2,056 12,605.22 413 21,392 23,524.53 110 36,677 13,152.47 it. EFARED 03/13.996, 20:09:34 City of San FAF 33 °GRAM: 0/12S' REVENUE T ACCOUNTING PERIOTt —Y1996 ut Sao Jacinto ND 07J CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ACCOUNT ag******** CURRENT mo******** ******** YEAR—TO—DATE s*I.o***** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL. XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE 00 REVENUE REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 70 REVENUE 70 ;00 AAA REVENUE 70 FUND TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 70 .00 490 193.39 101 836 342.61 .00 490 493.39 101 - B36 342-.61 .00 490 493.39 101 036 342.61 .00 490 493.39 101 836 342.61 EPARED 03/13/1996. 20:09:34 City of San Jacinto PAGE 34 OGRAM; GM259L REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 tv ol San Jacinto bdi 074 CAR POOL MITIGATION ACCOUNT sm******** CURRENT x********* ******** YEAR-TO-DATE *******1+ ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL, XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE 00 REVENUE .05 REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 436 .00 3,052 1,745.19 57 5,233 3,487.01 3 REVENUE 436 .00 3,052 1,745.19 57 5,233 3,4S7.01 08 REVENUE OU 65 DEVELOPER FEES 0 WS 1+44 REVENUE: 0 00 3+X4 REVFNUT 436 S10 REVENUE 110 12 25 EMPLOYEE COMPUTER PROGRAM 2.506 510 2,506 310 ippx REVENUE 2,506 POND TOTAL CAR POOL MITIGATION 2,942 .00 .00 . 0() 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 3,052 1,745.19 57 5,233 3,407.81 .00 17,542 .00 30,066 30,066.00 .00 17,542 .00 30,066 30,066.00 .00 17,542 .00 30,066 30,066.00 .00 20,594 1,745.19 9 35,299 33,553.61 EPARED 20:09:34 City of Sao, DORAN! ON25c, REVENUE ACCOUNTING PERIOD ,e/1996 tY of Ba4 ,-• .-^•^- •._ ND 075 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT 4.********* CURRENT **1111101***It 1.1******* YEAR-TO-DATE ******** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL. /REV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE 00 REVENUE 'AZ REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 402 .00 2,814 2.796.01 99 4,821 2.024.99 REVENUE 402 .00 2,814- 2,796.01 99 4,821 2,024799 ()S REVENUE OH 65 DEVELOPER FEES 0 ;OH REVENUE 0 I00 II** REVENUE: 402 FUND TOTAL LOCAL TRANSPORTATION 402 .00 0 .00 0 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 .00 2,814 2,796.01 99 4,821. 2.024.99 .G0 2,814 2,796.01 99 4.821 -2,024;99 :EPARED 03/13/1996. 20:09:34 City of San Jacinto :OGRAMI 0M259L REVENUE REPORT PAGE 36 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 tv of San Jacinto IND 076 REGIONAL TRANSPOROATION ACCOUNT *****mooax* CURRENT *0***14**-1(0 i*prm000mx* YEAR—TO—DATE m44-4***** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE SOO REVENUE 305 REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 646 305 itrN REVENUE 646 300 REVENUE OB 63 DEVELOPER FEES 30B ** REVENUE 0 300 )iNA REVENUE 6-16 FUND Tura_ REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION 646 .00 4,522 4,569.09 101 .00 4,522 4.569.09 101 .00 .00 .00 .()0 7,748 3,178.11 7.740 3,179.11 o .00 0 .00 0 .00 o .00 4,522 4,569.09 101 7.710 3,173.11 4.522 4,569.09 101 7,748 3,178.11 EPAREU 03/13/A"96. 20:0934 City of San J--into :DORAN: 0M259 REVENUE ty San Jacinto 37 ACCOUNTING PERIOD ./1996 - WD 07? PUBLIC BUILDING ACCOUNT NU*NN****14 CURRENT ********** ******mx YEAR-TO-DATE ******** ANNUAL. UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL )REV ESTIMATE BALANCE SOO REVENUE $05 REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 45 .00 315 314.32 100 535 220.66 g05 N* -REVENUE 45 .00 315- 314.32 --100 535 220.6S 308 REVENUE 00 63 DEVELOPER FEES 0 .00 0 .00 0 :00 SON ffa REVENUE 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 300 *** REVENUE 45 .00 315 314.32 100 535 220.68 FOND TOTAL PUBLIC DWI:DINO 45 .00 315 314.32 100 535 220.60 i • REPARED 03/13/1996. 20:09:34 City of San Jacinto PAGE 30 ROGRAM: GM259L REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 ift, of San Jacinto ------__----_--- -- -----. ..-- . . [IND 060 CFI) NO. 2 CAPITAL. ACCOUNT AA**X**N*X CURRENT *1.(04/q10,6**1** ******** YEAR-TO-DATE **)***k** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE 300 REVENUE 305 REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST :soni REVENUE 300 A*m REVENUE 1,292 .00 9,044 1,216.63 14 15,500 14,263.37 1,292 .00 9,044 1,216.63 14 15,500 14,263.37 1,292 .00 9,044 1,216.63 14 15,500 14,203.37 390 REVENUE 399 REVENUE. 50 11 INTER -FUND TRANSFERS -IN 0 .00 0 .00 0 50 21 RESIDUAL. EU. TRANSFERS IN 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 no .4 MISC REVENUE 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 ' 0 .00 390 mAA REVENUE 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 FUND TOTAL CFD NU, 2 CAPITAL 1,292 .00 9,044 1,216.63 14 15,500 14,283.37 FEARED 03/43/f96. 200934 City of San ,Lc.into 7ORAMI 3M2t REVENUE r- PACK. 39 ACCOUNTING PERIOD /1996 ty of San Jacinto ,,,, --------------------- 0 Ow AD 94 - 1 CAPITAL ACCOUNT /i********* CURRENT ********** W******* YEAR-TO-DATE ******** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE SALANCE- 00 REVENUE b2 REVENUE 06 57 ASSESSMENT PAYOFFS 02 44 - REVENUE O .00 0 .00 0 .00 O .00 .00 0 .0cy Oti REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 292 .00 2,044 2,565.97 126 - 3,500 - -934.03-- 05 a* REVENUE 292 .00 2,044 2,565.97 126 3,500 ' 934.03 09 REVENUE 0.9 92 DOND PROCEEDS 09NM REVENUE 00 4;* REVENUE O .00 0 00,000.00 0 00,000.00- O .00 o oo,000.00 o oo,000.00- 292 400 -2,0-471 -02,565..97-4039- 3,500 79,065.97- 190 REVENUE . /99 REVENUE 30 11 INTER -FUND 1RANSFERS-IN 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 --: 199 *it REVENUE 0 .00 _0__ .00 590 mxrx REVENUE 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 .00 FUND TOTAL AD 94 - 1 CAPITAL 292 .00 2,044 82,565.97 4039 3,500 79,065,97- kt :PARED 03/13/1996. 20:09:34 City of San Jacinto PAGE 40 IORAM (M259L REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 i,/ of San Jacinto --------------------------------------• - 41) 089 S.J. UNIFIED S.D. TRUST ACCOUNT ****o***** cuRRENT 44********* ******** YEAR-TO-DATE m******* ANNUAL UNREALIZED NCCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL, XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE )0 REVENUE REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 0 .00 0 19,924.83 0 19,924.03- Dti-S wt* REVENUE 0 .00 0 19,924.83 0 DO qA* REVENUE 0 .00 0 19,924.83 0 19,924.83- 90 REVENUE REVENUE 50-11 INTER --FUND TRANSFERS-1N 25,000 - :06 115,660 .00 ---- 300,000 300,000,00 99 .o.- REVENUE 25,000 .00 175,000 .00 300,000 300,000.00 90 'Nit. REVENUE 25,000 .00 175,000 .00 300,000 300,000.00 FUND TOTAL S.J. UNIFIED S.D. TRUST 25.000 .00 175,000 19,924.83 11 300,000 280,075.17 2 PARED 03/13 9�. 20109134 City of San ' ' into lORAMI 0025', REVENUE ty of San Jacinto ----------------------------- - lI) b91 SOBOBA PROJECT FUND ACCOUNT NCCOUNT DESCRIPTION DO REVENUE Ot REVENUE ********** CURRENT N1*/**14***** ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV PAr 41 ACCOUNTING PERIOD ...e/1996 ********-YEAR—TO—DATE ******** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE 04 10 INTEREST 200 .00 1,456 41B.07 29 2,500 REVENUE 200 '.00 ' 1;456 410.07 29 2,500 00 ififik REVENUE 200 .00 1,456 418.87 29 20500 90 REVENUE 99 REVENUE 50 li 1NTER—FUND NSFERS—IN 7,943 99 4M REVENUE 7,943 90. *** REVENUE 7,943 FUNDTOTAL SODUBA PRDJECI FUND 0,151 2,081.13 2,001-:13' 14 2,001.13 .-00 55,601— .00 95,310 —95;-310700'— .00 55,601 .00 95,310 95,310.00 .00 55,601 .00 95,310 95,310.00 .00 -57;057- -410.07 I 97,01-(T 9t,391.1.5 ZVAREB 0Z/13/1996f 20:09:39 Clty of San Jacinto PAGE 42 3GRAMi GM259f REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 ty of San Jacinto 4i 092 SLIGO BA DEBT SERVICE ' ACCOUNT 4X******** CURRENT **1******** ******** YEAR-T0-DATE *******m ANNUAL UNREALIZED • ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATE BALANCE 00 REVENUE 01 TAXES 04 05 VAX INCREMENT 01** TAXES 05 REVENUE 15,680 71,619.18 457 109.760 71,619.18 65 180,161 116,541.02 _ 15,680 71,619.18 457 109,760 71,619.18 65 180,161 116,541.82 04 10 INTEREST 1,036 .00 7,266 4,951.97 68 12,455 7,503.03 11 05 1416+ REVENUE 1,03B .00 7,266 4,951.97 6B 12,455 70503.03 00 **it REVENUE 16,710 71,619.18 428 117,026 76,571.15 65 200.616 124,044.85 FOND TWAT SOO(JOA DEBT SERVICE 16,718 71,619.18 428 117,026 76,571.15 65 200,616 124,044,05 PARED 03/13" 20:09:34 'GRAM GM255 REVENUE r City of San PAGi'-. 43 ACCOUNTING PERIOD /1996 Y of San Jacinto - . ID 094 LOW-muLimuusINo:,sosuw, ACCOUNT 4o4******** CURRENT *********4 ***;***** YEAR-TO-DATE ******** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL %REV ESTIMATED ACTUAL %REV ESTIMATE BALANCE >0 REVENUE: 51 TAXES 04 05 TAX INCREMENT• 3,920 17,904.79 457 27,440 17,904.79 65 47,040 29,135.21 04 10 INTEREST 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 04 * REVENUE 3,920 17,904.79 457 27,440 17,904.79 65 47,040 29,135.21 )1 H* TAXES 3,920 17,904.79 457 27,440 17,904.79 65 47,040 29,135.21 55 -- REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 0 .00 0 136.44 0 136.44- D5 *.m REVENUE 0 .00 0 136.44 0 136.44- 00 *sm REVENUE 3,920 17,904.79 457 27,440 113,041.23 66 47,040 28,998.77 FUND TOTAL LOW-MOD/HOLISING/GOBODA 3,920 1.7,904.79 457 27,440 111,041.23 66 47,040 28,998• 77 12 14 36 3 , 4, PARED 03/13/1996. 2*0:09:34 City of San Jacinto IGRANt 8M259L. REVENUE REPORT PAGE 44 ACCOI.JNTINCi PERIOD 07/1996 'Y of Sail Ja.iIui. !D 096 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ACCOUNT ►CCOUNT DESCRIPTION 44MMMM**** CURRENT **1**M*MMM ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV )0 REVENUE REVENUE ,01 10 INTEREST 04 12 INTEREST — FISCAL AGENT 04 * USE: OF MONEY ANO PROPERTY MM REVENUE 09 REVENIJE . 07 01 SALE OF PROPERTY 09 MM REVENUE 00 , MMM REVENUE ***Miff.** YEAR"TT3—DATE MMMMMMMM ESTIMATED ACTUAL REV ANNUAL UNREALIZED ESTIMATE. BALANCE 10,833 .00 75,831 15,356.02 20 130,000 114,643.98 O .00 0 .00 0 .00 10,1333 .00 75,031 15,356.02 20 130,000 1.14,643.90 10,833 .00 75,831 15,356.02 20 130,000 114,643.98 O .00 0 .00 0 .00 O .00 0 .00 0 .00 10,833 .00 75,831 15,356.02 20 130,000 114,643.98 90 REVENUE 99 REVENUE 50 11 INTER —FUND 1"RANSFERS--IN 18,750 .00 131,250 .00 __ __. 225,000 225,000.00 i9ry' MM REVENUE 18,750 .00 131,250 .00 2:?,:,1000 225,000600 ;90 u;,4 REVENUE 10,750 .00 131,250 .00 225,000 225,000.00 FUND 'FIJTAL REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 29,503 .00 207,081 15,356.02 7 355,000 339,643.9B a ): 'ARED 03/13/ 20:09:34 City of San J;-'mto PAGE. 45 3RAM: SM259L REVENUE R' ACCOUNTING PERIOD s .996 e of San JaLiwtu ) 097 REDEVELOPMENT DEBT SERV. ACCOUNT *,.******** CURRENT **A*N**N** ******** YEAR-TO-DATE *14****** ANNUAL UNREALIZED 'ZCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL %REV ESTIMATE BALANCE' ------- _---------- — ----- - 04 05 REVENUE TAXES TAX INCREMENT TAXES REVENUE 97,440 460,979.94 494. 682.136 97.44B 400.979.94 494 602,136 04 10 INTEREST 2,333 *Ai REVENUE 2,333 whit REVENUE 99,781 466,461.27 72 1.169.372 6E10.410.73 488,461.77 72 -1,169,6t2. 600,Yiu.73 14 .00 16,331 4;665.54 - 29 26,000 .00 16.331 4,665.54 29 28,000 23.334.46 400,979.94 482 698,467 493,126.81 71 1,197,372 704,245.19 '0 REVENUE '9 REVENUE ' 50 11 IN1ER-FUND TRANSFERS -IN 0 .00 .00 0 .00 ,9 +44. REVENUE 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 )0 N.iot REVENUE 0 .00 0 .00 0 .60- q.4.40 T0TL REDEVELOPMENT DENT SERV, 99.781 460,979.94 482 698,467 493,126.81 71 10197,372 704,2450.9 ' 2 LrFiKtx V4/10/1770. ,:wovro,, DRiIiF (3M259L REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 ty or San Jacinto . riiioWC66-Holl NaUSINS S.J. ACCOUNT a********* CURRENT ********** ******** YEAR-TO-DATE tHEittEit*** ANNUAL UNREALIZED ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED ACTUAL XREV ESTIMATED ACTUAL %REV ESTIMATE BALANCE 00 REVENUE 61 TAXES 64 05 VAX INCREMENT SO1 tto TAXES REVENUE 04 10 INTEREST 505 W4 REVENUE: 309 REVENUE 07 01 SALE OF PROPERTY 309 tytt REVENUE 300 *Ho REVEN6F 390 399 50 11 24,362 120.244.99 494 170,534 122,115.33 72 292,343 170.227.67 24,362 120,244.99 494 170,534 122,115.33 72 292,343 170,227.67 2,126 2,126 .00 1403E32 IT3040611 124 25,515 7•109039-- --k .00 14,882 18,406.11 124 25,515 740E3.89 44,500 .00 311,500 .00 534,000 534,000.00 44,500 .00 311,500 .00 534,000 534,000,00 70,980 120,244.99 169 496,916 140,521.44 28 1351,E5e ii1,336.,J6 REVENUE INTER -FUND TRANSFERS -IN 4,322 .00 30,254 .00 51,860 51,860.00 REVENUE 39 tita REVENUE 4,322 .00 30,254 .00 51,060 51,860.00 390 iiiO4, REVENUE 4,322 .00 30,254 .00 51,860 51,660.00 75,310 120,244.99 195 527,170 140,521,44 72 903.718 763,196.56 FUND TOTAL LOW -MOD HOUSING S.J. BRAND TOTAL A.295.630 205300335.97 195 9,069,410 6,502,363.40 72 15,547,533 9,045,169.60 APPENDIX B 031996. MYBI - 6 APPENDIX B FUND ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION 10 160 Business Licenses 10 221 Construction Permits 10 237 Mobile Home Permits 10 238 Sign Permits 10 240 Public Works Permits 10 250 Other Licenses & Permits 10 595 Highway Carrier In -Lieu Taxes 10 611 Contractor License Verification 10 620 Sewer Permits 10 625 Special Fire Service Fees 10 630 Plan Checking Fees 1995-96 FISCAL YEAR MID -YEAR REVIEW OF BUDGET REVENUES 1995-96 FORECAST 108,810 149,830 10,370 1,200 1,000 1,000 30,000 9,000 100 8,700 80,000 ADJUSTED 1995-96 REVENUE FORECAST ADJUSTMENT 99,000 (9,810) 102,500 (47,330) 9,950 (420) 0 (1,200) 3,000 2,000 4,000 3,000 34,650 4,650 5,415 (3,585) 0 (100) 11,500 2,800 71,768 (8,232) TOTAL NET GENERAL FUND REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS (58,227) Pap- APPENDIX C AGAN)AS\031996 .MYBI 'ROORAN7 0M2c4" :Vtv of San !Mu 58% OF YEAP:'.,.APSED n..ac. ACCOUNTING PERT27/1996 'UND 010 GENERAL FUND DEPT/DIV 1100 LEGISLATIVE/CITY COUNCIL/ • iA ELE OBJ ACCOUNY *********CURRENT********** ,**********YEAR —TO --GATE******* ANNUAL UNENCUMB. 3UB 'SUB - DESCRIPTION. WET.: ACTUM. a%EXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE: __ . _.. ., ..+... ter. '---..' 410 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 111 COUNCIL —CLERK .. ATTORNEY PERSONNEL SERVICES 10 03 SALARIES —PART TIME - 11 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11 10 FRINGE BENEFITS 21 . SUPPLIES 21 10 OFFICE SUF'F'LIES/POSTAGE 88 2076490B02 4816 2076.90 43 .00 8250 56 127.10 227 392 127.10 32 .00 668 540.90 19 83, 46.74 56 581 1394.60 240 .00 1000 394460—.146..:.. 31 TRAVEL & I1EETING OUSTS 31 20 CUNF'.SEMINARS. TUITION 417 .00 0 2919 390.94 13 .00 5000 4609.06 8 411 ** ** COUNC1L—CLERIC & ATTEAW 1244 2250.74 1111— 3989:54 4b .00 14918 10920,46 2 410 MN *;4 GENERAL 00VtRN11EN'T 1244 2250.74 181 8708 3989.54 46 .00 14918 10928.46 DIV 1100 TOTAL. **-K*+.114u CITY. COUNCIL 1244 2250.74 181 8708 3989.54 46 .00 14918 10928.46 27 :OGRAM: GM2671, lv of San Jacinto 581. OF YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 IND 010 GENERAL FUND DEPT/DIV 1110 LEGISLATIVE/CITY COUNCIL/CITY CLERK ELE. OBJ ACCOUNT ****A1***111CURRENT*****%**** **********YEAR-TO-DATEft****** -A1,1 • JB- SUB DESCRIPTION • BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP , BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBR, BUDGET BALANCE , . 10 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 11 COUNCIL -CLERK & ATTORNEY 10 PERSONNEL SERVICES . 10 01 SALARIES -FULL TINE 2775 5050.53 182 19425 19006.03 98 .00 33304 14295.97 57 02 SALARIES -OVERTIME 42 518.58 1235 294 2326.09 791 .00 500 1E326.09- 465 03 SALARIES -PART TIME 125 57.69 46 875 721:12 92 .60 1500 776.1§0 48 10 M* PERSONNEL SERVICES 2942 5626.00 191 20594 22055.21 107 .00 35304 1324E1,76 63 11 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11 10 FRINGE BENEFITS - 619 1283.59 207 4333 4745.94 110 .00 7427 2681.06 64 15 RETIREMENT CUNTRIBU1ION0 344 476.82 139 2408 2360.59 90 .00 4133 1772.41 t5T 17 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0 . 6 b 0 6 5.34- 0 .00 0 E.34 -6 20 WORKERS COMPENSATION 12 15.52 129 84 80.04 95 .00 146 65.96 55 11 44m EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 975 1775.93 182 6825 71E11.23 105 .00 :L1706 1521.77 61 21 SUPPLIES 21 10 OFFICE SUPPLIES/POSTAGE 75 67.03 89 525 1155.36 220 .00 900 255.36- 128 30 PROELSSIUNAL/TFCHNICAL 30 90 PROF -OTHER 1225 .00 0 8575 13152.27 153 .00 11700 1547.73 90 31 TRAVEL & MEETINO COSTS 31 ip OILEAGEREIMBURSEMENT 25 .00 0 175 19.20 11 .00 300 280.80 6 20 CONF.SEMINARS. TUITION 23 39.00 170 161 166.00 103 .00 270 104.00 62 31 44* TRAVEL & MEETING COSTS 48 39.00 al 336 185.20 .J., .00 570 384.80 33 34 RENTAL SERVICES 34 05 CONTRACT SERVICE 733 .00 0 5131 6106.77 119 .00 8800 2691.21 89, 36 OTHER SERVICES N CHARGES 36 25 ADVERTISING 208 11.70 20 1456 3951.03 272 .00 2500 1154.63- 158 34 INSURANCE & DAMAOE COSTS 37 05 INSURANCE N. BONDS 15 .00 0 105 .00 0 .00 175 175.00 0 ' 40 CAPITAL OUTLAYS 40 45 CAP -MACHINERY N. ENUIPMENT 105 .00 0 735 .00 0 .00 1260 1260.00 0 11 w* ** COUNCIL -CLERK & ATTORNEY 6326 7550.46 119 44282 53792.90 122 .00 75915 22122.10. 71 ..... 10 44 iiR GENERAL 00VERNMENT 6326 7550.46 119 44282 53792.90 122 .00 75915 22122.10 71 I TV 1110 TOTAL 44*4444W4, 1-,I1Y CLERK 6326 7550.46 1.1944762 53792.90 122 .00 75915 22122.10 71 "kOGRAMS GM 67L :Itv of San Into 58X OF YEAP 7..AP 'ED ACCOUNTING FE.RIF?`•,.,07/1996 7UND 010 GENERAL FUND DEPT/DIV 1111 LEGISLATIVE/CITY COUNCIL/LEGAL SERVICES 3A ELE 0BJ ACCOUNT- ww*HGwwwwwCURRENTw*wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwYEAF.—ZO-LA1F..+ewx**ww ..t 3UB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL %EXF• ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE 111DOT 110 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 411 COUNCIL —CLERK t. ATTORNEY TROFESSIONAL/TECHNktAL. 30 90 FROF-0THER 8333 400 0 58331 36009.52 62 .00 100000 63990.48 wwcotiNcII_-CLEkK A A[TUF.`NEi -8333-'._ _-...00 - 5...-----7i:%333........_. 36009.!:.2 62 .00 1.00000 6199I5.4b 36 410 ww ww GENERAL GOVERNMENT 0333 .00 0 58331 36009.5' 62 .00 100000 63990.48 36 DIV 1111 TOTAL www+rwww LEGAL SERVICES DEFT 11 1UTAL wwuw;�w;r LEGISLATIVE/CITY COUNCIL 15903 9001.20 62 111321 93791.96 04 .00 190833 97041.04 49 '8333 .00 0 58331 36009.52 62 .00 100000 63990e48` 36 ROMAN.: G112671 ity oF San Jacinto 50% OF YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 LING 010 GENERAL FUND DEFT/DIV 1200 CITY MANAGER/ A ELE 00J ACCOUNT 4444014******CURRENT*m******** **********YEAR-TO-DATE***m**x ANNUAL UNENCUMB, 1r MI SUB DESCRIPTION . BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL 4EXF ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE MGT 10 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 12 CITY MANAGER 10 CITY MANAGER 10 01 SALARIES -FULL TIME 12140 10627.98 153 84980 08065.00 104 .00 ' 145680 57614.12 61 11 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11 10 FRINGE BENEFITS 1434 6107.38 426 10038 10312.12 182 .00 17212 15 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION 1567 2291.20 146 10969 11356.18 104 .00 18802 20 INS PREM - LTD 215 361.68 168 1505 1417.01 94 .00 2581 11 44* EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3216 9756.26 272 22512 31006.11 138 .00 38595 21 i>66-Lth6 21 lo OFFICE SUFFLIES/POSIAOF 29 (,8.27 229 203 272.01 .134 .00 350 77.99 78 1100.12- 106 7445.02 60 1163,19 ..45 7508.89 81 31 TRAVEL 6. MEETING COSTS 31 15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 67 14.10 21 469 497.95 106 .00 800 302.05 62 29 cpw/TuvrioNimps 126 12-00 10 882 844.30 96 .00 1510 665.70 56 31 4 TRAVEL &- MEEljN0 COSTS 193 26.10 14 1351 1312.25 99 .00 2310 967.75 58 33 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 33 50 R/M-MOTOR VEHICLES EQUIP 33 46.96 142 231 124.59 54 .00 400 275.41 31 34 RENTAL SERVICES 34 50 VEHICLES-RENT/LEASES 35 UTILITIES 35 17 CELLULAR TELEPHONE 433 .00 0 3031. 5190.00 171 00 5190 63 713.99 125 441 449.60 :1.02 .00 750 .00 roo 300.40 60 37 INSURANCE 37 05 INSORANCE/DGNM 6 too 6 41!. too 0 .00 75 75.00 0 7,Q INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 10 IMES-FUND TRANSFERS OUT o too o o .00 o too o too .o 112 ** ** CITY MANAUER 16113 27602.56 171 112791 126530.44 112 .00 193350 66819.56 65 110 ** ifw GENERAL GOVERNMENT 16113 27602.56 171 112791 126530.44 112 .00 :193350 66819.56 65 1200 TOTAL **Ii**4444 CITY MANAGER 16113 27602.56 171 112791 126530.44 112 193350 66819.56 65 'RouRAM: GMJ6/L SOX OF YEAR TAFSFII ACCOUNTING FERIOT1 07/1996 lty °I !la(' Intc -- , UND 010 OFNERAT FUND DEPT/DIV 1210 CITY MA14,6ERIPERSONNE1 4A ELL cjbJ AccoUNr 444**44*%*IirOMENTi4****N.**** *********iiyEAR-To D61FA*mmx ANNUAL UNENCUMD- 7.11N SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL NEW ENCHMDR. BUDGET BALANCE BEIM. X 410 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 412 CITY MANABER 16 CITY HANAUER 10 01 01 SALARIES-FUTL TIME 1385 2505.30 181 9695 15046.67 155 .00 16614 1567.13 91 ii EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11 10 FRINGE BENEFITS 106 1460.17 1371 756 2696,36 357 .00 1297 1401.36- 206 15 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION 171 530.58 193 1191 1079.70 157 .00 2057 177.22 91 20 INS MEM - LTD 26 65.52 252 192 290.19 159 .00 315 - 24:61---92------- 11 ** EMPLOYEE DENEFITS 305 1076.27 615 2135 4666.33 228 .00 3669 1199.33- 133 21 SUPPLIES 21 10 OFFICE SUPPLIES/POSTAGE 125 21.11 17 875 577.90 66 .00 1500 922.02 39 30 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL 30 90 PROF -OTHER 1206 176.00 15 8456 2721.73 31 TRAVEL & MEETING COS.M 31 20 CONE/TUITION/MEMBERSHIPS 150 .00 0 1106 100.00- S6 OTHER SERVICES & CHANT'S 36 25 ADVERTISIN6 83 .00 0 581 693.69 412 ** ** CITY mmnom -- 3264 47779 . 71 HO 22049 23066.,10 410 ** *ei- GENERAL GOVERNMENT 3264 4576.71 140 22048 23800.60 DIV 1210 TOTAL i**014*i4R PERSONNEL 3264 4576.71 140 22846 23600.60 DEFT 12 TOTAL. **ita CITY MANAGER 19377 32101.27 166 135639 150331.04 32 .00 14500 11778.27 19 .00 1900 2008.00 119 .00 1000 306.31 69 104 .00 39103 15302.40 6i - 104 .00 39103 15302.40 61 104 .00 39103 15362.40 61 , .00 232533 62201.96 65 )GRAM: 0M267L 'y of San Jacinto `v. 50X OF YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 111 010 GENERAL FUND DEPT/DIV 1400 FINANCE/ ELE OBJ ACCOUNT ****44****CURRENT********** **********YEAR-TO-DATE.i./.***** ANNUAL UNENCUMB. SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BDOT ---------------------- ) GENERAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE/TREASURER 10 PERSONNEL BENEFITS 10 01 SALARIES -FULL TIME 8979 16392.97 183 62053 56321.41 90 .00 107742 51420.59 52 02 spa_faRIE.p-ovEralmc o 685.30 ___.0 0 154E4.90 0 .00 0 1548.98- 0 1.6 ¥ FERSONNEL EIETAEFITS 11779 17077.77 190 62053 57070.39 97 .00 107742 49-t171.61 --E4 11 EMPLOyEE BENEFITS 11 10 FRINGE BENEFITS 2045 4235.79 207 14315 9736.03 68 .00 24545 14808.17 40 15 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION 1149 1997.64 174 8043 7109.25 09 .00 13702 6592.75 52 20 INS PREM - LTD 147 185.49 126 1029 843.01 82 .00 1758 914.13 4B 11 t".t EMPLMEE DENFFITS 3311 640.13. 11/2 '23307 11769.95 76 .00 40005 22315 :60 - - 714 21 surPLIEB 21 10 OFFICE SUPELIE5/POSTI4ot 167 69.50 47 1169 713.99 61 .00 2000 12-(36:zi----3 30 pROFESSONAT/TECHNICAL 30 90 PRUF-UTHER 1766 .00 0 11956 14070.00 121 .00 20500 31 TRAVEL & MELTING COSTS 31 15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 8 17.98 225 56 164.90 295 .00 100 64.90- 165 20 CONF./SEMINARS/WORKSHOPS 50 .00 0 350 5E17.00 168 .00 600 13.00 98 31. 44-ii TRAVEL & MEETING COSTS 513 17.90 31 406 751,90 i05 .00 700 51.90- 107 34 RENTAL SERVICES 34 05 CONTRACT SERVICES 3543 1050.00 30 24001 25655.40 103 .00 42513 16057.60 60 37 INSURANCE & DAMAGE COSTS 37 05 INSURANCE 7 BONDS 6 .00 0 42 .0E, 0 4 1 )0. FINANCE/TREASURER I71302 .:163411 130 174614 117631.63 94 0 ** .4 6ENERAL UOVERNi4ENT 17662 24634.17 13.0 124614 117631.63 94 V 1400 TOTAL FINANCE 17602 24634.17 13B 124614 117631.67 94 .00 213615 95903.37 55 .00 75 75.00 0 .00 213615 95903,31 55 .00 213615 95903.37 55 2 5 6 'A til:3RAM: (3Nk671,.,.. l 1' Y of San . UND 01.0 (GENERAL FUND A EL.E GBJ - ACCOUNT US SUB DESCFIPTION 10 GEIJERAL_ GOVERNMENT 14 FINANCE/TRE.ASLIRER 10 PERSONNEL. BENEFITS 1.0 03 SALARIES -•FART TIME 125 125.00 100 975 012.50 93 .00 1500 667.50 11 EMPLOYF_:E. BENEFITS 11. 10 FRINGE BENEFITS 9 9.56 106 63 62.15 99 .00 1..1.3 50.95 55 20 INS PREM ."". LTD 0 .00 0 0 .30 0 .00 0 .36-- 0 11 N+ EMPLOYEE DENE_'F'1TS 9 9.56 106 63 62.53 99 .00 1 13 50.47" 55 Al TRAVEL. & MEETING COSTS 3.1. 2U CUNF./SEMINAI S/LJ(TI0 U0PS 6 .00 0 4 .00 0 .00 75 75.00 -_-__0 37 INSLJI:ANI:L. & DAMAGE COSTS 3. 05 INBuFANCE Q BONUS 21 .00 0 14"7 .00 0 .00 250 250:00 14 •wrt N.W. F.1NAN[:;E/1REASURER 161. 1.34.56 04 11.27 ES75.03 79 .00 1930 1062.97 45 :10 ,eat s<"u GENERAL GOVERNMENT 1.61 :1.34.56 94 11.27 075.01 70 .00 1930 .L062.97 45 rIV 1410 1U1AL wN):NNHN TREASURER 161 134.56 04 1127 875.03 70 .00 1938 1062.97 45 a11-'T 14 TOIAL. iiifNN k N)t FINANCE 17963 24760.73 130 125741. 110506.66 94 .00 215553 97046.34 501. OF YE:AF t1f 9EIi r}(COLINT.I: N(:i I ER LOBE 7/1.996 DEPT/DIV 1410 FINANCE/1nEA1LIREF «wa<xxr)rtti4OURRE.NT>•r.*w*+E+r+t*w ***%**rtt+trYEAR._TO-_L BUDGET ACTUAL_ XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXF' ANNUAL UNC:NCUKFTX E:NCLIMDF. BUDGET BALANCE BGOT 5.IL STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Laurie Mora, Deputy City Clerk DATE: March 19, 1996 SUBJECT: Claim - GTE - File #JS 96-12 RECOMMENDATION: Reject the claim as recommended by the Claims Adjustor pursuant to Government Code Section 913. COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY March 6, 1996 Laurie Mora Deputy City Clerk City of San Jacinto 312 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 RE: GTE v. City of San Jacinto Loss Date : 10/13/95 Our File No. JS 96-12 Dear Ms. Mora: We are in receipt of the above -captioned claim for damages filed with the City of San Jacinto by claimant Beth Collins, Claims Coordinator, for GTE. We request that you take the action indicated below: I 1 CLAIM REJECTION: Written rejection of claim by authorized board/officer in accordance with Government Code Section 913. LATE CLAIM: Do NOT reject claim but RETURN it for failure to file within time limit prescribed in Government Code Section 911.2. Transmittal NOT to contain "WARNING" required by Section 913, but should advise that the recourse to file "Application for Leave to File Late Claim" as provided in Government Code Section 911.4. his must be returned within 45 days of the date claim mailed or delivered. [ ] INSUFFICIENT CLAIM: Send notice of insufficiency for failure to comply with Government Code Section 910 andior910.2 and/or 910.4 and cite the following specific insufficiencies: This must be sent within 20 days of your receipt of claims AMENDED CLAIM: Reject claim as set forth in first paragraph above, CLAIM REJECTION, APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE CLAIM: Reject the Application under Govemment Code Section 911.8. OPERATION OF LAW: Defer any written response pending our further advice. Please provide us with a copy of any response requested above. If you have any questions, please contact the CVJPIA office. ly yours, ennis M{Mo1 Claims Manager DMM/lc 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 200, Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 341-0492 FAX (619) 340-5949 GTE -411; aryclERttsetr, FEB 2 1 1996 Ey February 12, 1996 City of San Jacinto 201 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 RE: Our File No.: 1070-95 CA GTE Telephone Operations CMR Claims Department P.O. Box 60770 Oklahoma City, OK 73146-0770 1-800-615-8485 Attached is a claim in triplicate for damage to our property which occurred on or about October 13, 1995. Also attached is our invoice dated December 11, 1995 in the amount of $2,239 49. We would appreciate prompt payment of our claim. Very truly yours, Beth Collins Claims Coordinator BC:sk Attachments PROOF OF SERVICE I am employed in the County of Oklahoma, State of Oldahoma. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is GI'h Claims Management Resources, 2720 N. Classen Blvd., Suite 106, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73146. On February 12, 1996, I served the following document described as: PROPERTY DAMAGE INVOICE on the interested parties in this action, by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as follows: CITY OF SAN JACINTO 201 E. MAIN- STREET SAN JACINTO, CA 92583 I am "readily familiar" with my employer's practice of collecting and processing correspondence for mailing Under that practice, in the ordinary course of business, mail is deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on the same day that it is collected from me, with postage thereon fully prepaid at Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if the postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in the proof of service declaration. Executed on February 12, 1996, at Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. X (State) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. (Federal) I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. Beth Collins Claims Coordinator GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED, CLAIMANT City of San Jacinto GTE GTE Telephone Operations CMR Claims Department P.O. Box 60770 OklLnerna Ciiy, OK 73146-0770 1-800-615-8485 GTE Incorporated, herewith presents its claim against City of San Jacinto. All notices must be sent to GTE Claims Management Resources, P.O. Box 60770, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73146. 1. Claimant's subsurface communications facilities located in the vicinity of Joboba Rd, San Jacinto, CA were found damaged October 13, 1995. The incident occurred while trenching to place irrigation water line. 2. Restoration of claimant's damaged facilities involves repair\replacement of our facilities. 3. The work was being performed under the supervision of R.K. Allen Landscape Construction. 4. Attached hereto is claimant's bill in the amount of 2,239.49 marked Exhibit"A" and made a part hereof. 5. Dated this 12th day of February,1996. GTE California Incorporated By (-1:LYtc,, Beth Collins Claims Coordinator 1-800-615-8485 GTE Telephone perations INVOICE CUSTOMER ADDRESS : CITY OF SAN JACINTO 201 E. MAIN STREET SAN JACINTO, CA 92583 INQUIRY NUMBER : (800) 615-8485 December 11, 1995 REMIT PAYMENT TO : GTE TELEPHONE OPERATIONS P.O. Box 9015 Everett, WA 98206-9015 MAIL CORRESPONDENCE TO: CMR CLAIMS DEPT. P.O. Box 60770 Okla City, OK 73146 CUST REFERENCE: GTE REFERENCE: INVOICE AMOUNT DUE: 578-4POO1BV 1070-95 CA WESCA0000000412 $ 2,239.49 DESCRIPTION: COST FOR REPAIR AND/OR REPLACEMENT OF FACILITIES DAMAGED ON 10/13/95 AT JOBOBA RD, SAN JACINTO, CA. A 600PR CABLE WAS DAMAGED WHILE TRENCHING TO PLACE IRRIGATION WATER LINE. NO LOCATE REQUESTED AS REQUIRED BY LAW LABOR HOURS 25.75 VEHICLE EXPENSE SUPERVISORY EXPENSE MATERIALS -CLOSURE BUR 6.0 REENT ARMORCAST (1) CONNECTOR AMP 26/22 (2400EA) COMPOUND SPLICE #165 3000GR (3) CONTRACTOR CHARGE: WEISSKER CONST. MINOR MATERIALS S $ 981.47 77.77 64.38 124.01 397.28 80.77 464.00 49.81 TOTAL INVOICE AMOUNT * * * $ 2,239.49 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE -k ;t * PLEASE REMIT THIS STUB WITH YOUR PAYMENT $ 2,239.49 CITY OF SAN JACINTO 201 E. MAIN STREET SAN JACINTO, CA 92583 December 11, 1995 INVOICE : WESCA0000000412 CUST REF : 578-4P001BV GTE REF : 1070-95 CA PAYMENT DUE UPON RECEIPT AMOUNT DUE: 2,239.49 GTE TELEPHONE OPERATIONS P. 0. Box 9015 Everett, WA 98206-9015 AMOUNT PAID: S A N JACINTO TO: Honorable Mayor & Councilmembers FROM: Les Evans, Director of Public Works via: Lyle W. Alberg, Interim City Manager DATE: March 19, 1996 Staff Report RE: CONTRACT WITH KAMMEYER & ASSOCIATES FOR DESIGN OF TOT LOT AND TOT LOT REPAIRS Recommendation: Approve the contract with Kammeyer & Associates for design of a new Tot Lot in Sallee Park and design of ADA retrofit for the tot lots in Rancho Park and the open space on Villines north of Esplanade Avenue, for a fee of $10,027. Fiscal Impact:. The approved 1995-96 budget includes $98,604 for the Sallee Park Tot Lot in CDBG Account 029-8661-440-4001. The approved 1995-96 budget includes $75,000 for the ADA tot lot retrofit in CFD #2 Account 080-9100-450-4001. Background: On February 14, 1995, in a joint City Council/School District meeting, a concept for improvements at. Sallee Park and Monte Vista Middle School was approved. Phase One of the Park Master Plan includes installation of a new tot lot. Accordingly, the City applied for CDBG funds for the tot lot and was granted $98,604. In order to make timely expenditures of the CDBG funds, design of the new tot lot should commence. On June 6, 1995, the City Council directed staff to prepare plans and specifications to advertise for bids for the retrofit .of the tot lot in Rancho Park and the tot lot on Villines north of Esplanade Avenue to meet ADA standards. CFD #2 funds were budgeted for this project. Staff Report/Kammeyer & Associates March 19, 1996 Page Two Proposals were requested and received from two consultants who have experience in tot lot design. Kammeyer and Associates designed the tot lot in the open space at Washington Street and Villines Avenue, while TBLA designed the tot lot in Mistletoe Park. Both consultants submitted good proposals. Staff recommends that Kammeyer and Associates be awarded the design contract for a fee of $10,027. The TBLA proposal included a fee of $11,500. CONTRACT FOR SERVICES This Agreement is made on , between THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ("Client"), with a principal place of business at 312 E. Main Street, San Jacinto, CA 92583 and Kammeyer & Associates ("Consultant"), an independent Consultant, with a principal place of business at 2837 Kellogg Avenue, Corona, CA 91719 ARTICLE 1. TERM OF CONTRACT 1.01. This agreement will become effective on the date stated above and will continue in effect until terminated as provided in this agreement. ARTICLE 2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT 2.01. Consultant agrees to perform the services specified in the 'Scope of Services" attached to this agreement, as Exhibit "A", and incorporated into this agreement by reference. Method of Performing Services 2.02. Consultant will determine the method, details, and means of performing the above -described services, and in accordance with the Scope of Services, prepared and presented by Consultant and attached hereto, 2.03. Consultant enters into this agreement, and will remain throughout the term of the agreement. as an independent consultant. Consultant agrees that he is not and will not become an employee, partner, agent, or principal of Client while this agreement is in effect. Consultant agrees that he is not entitled to the rights or benefits afforded to Client's employees, including disability or unemployment insurance, workers' compensation, medical insurance, sick leave, or any other employment benefit. Consultant is responsible for providing, at his own expense, disability, unemployment, and other insurance, workers' compensation, training, permits, and licenses for himself and for his employees and subcontractors. -1- Payment of Income Taxes 2.04. Consultant is responsible for paying when due all income tz es, including estimated taxes, incurred as a result of the compensation paid by Clie t to Consultant for services under this Agreement. On request, Consultant will provide Client with proof of timely payment. Consultant agrees to indemnify Client for any claims, costs, losses. fees, penalties, interest. or damages suffered by Client resulting from Consultant's failure to comply with this provision. Use of Employees or Subcontractors 2.05. Consultant may, at Consultants own expense, use any employees or subcontractors as Consultant deems necessary to perform the services required of Consultant by this agreement. Client may not control, direct, or supervise Consultant's employees or subcontractors in the performance of those services. Conflict of Interest 2.06 Consultant warrants that it has no interest as would constitute a conflict of interest under City's Resolution No. 2226, adopted pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974, and will comply with any applicable provision of said Resolution. ARTICLE 3. COMPENSATION Maximum Compensation 3.01. In consideration for the services to be performed by Consultant, Client agrees to pay to Consultant hourly compensation pursuant to the "Fee Schedule," attached collectively as Exhibit "B". In no event shall total fees for completion of all services, costs, sub -consultants, etc., exceed S10,027.00. Date for Payment of Compensation 3.02. Consultant shall bill monthly for fees incurred and costs so expended n such previous month. City shall pay such billed amounts within 45 days after billing, unless City shall dispute any portion of said billing, in which case, the undisputed portion shall be paid. Any unresolved billing disputes shall be submitted for decision in accordance with Section 7.04 of this Agreement. -2- ARTICLE 4. OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR Non -Exclusive Relationship 4.01. Consultant may represent, perform services for, and contract with as many additional clients, persons, or companies as Consultant, in his sole discretion, sees fit Time and Place of Performing Work 4.02. Consultant may perform the services under this agreement at any suitable time and location he chooses, and in accordance with the Scope of Services, prepared by Consultant and attached to this Agreement. Tools, Materials and Equipment 4.03. Consultant will supply all tools, materials, and equipment required to perform the services under this agreement. Workers' Compensation 4.04. Consultant agrees to provide workers' compensation insurance for Consultant's employees and agents and agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Client for any and all claims arising out of any injury, disability, or death of any of Consultant's employees or agents. Liability Insurance 4.05. Consultant agrees to maintain policies of insurance in the minimum aggregate of S1,000,000 to cover any negligent acts or omissions (including owned and non -owned automobile liability coverage) committed by Consultant or Consultant's employees or agents during the performance of any duties under this agreement. Consultant shall further maintain Errors and Omissions coverage for professional negligence in the minimum amount of $1,000,000. Consultant's Qualification 4.06. Consultant represents that he has the qualifications and skills necessary to perform the services under this agreement in a competent, professional manner, without the advice or direction of Client. This means Consultant is able to fulfill the requirements of this agreement. Failure to perform all the services required under this agreement constitutes a material breach of the agreement. -3- Indemnity 4.07. Consultant agrees to indemnify, and hold Client free and harmless from all losses, costs, expenses, obligations, liabilities, damages, recoveries, and deficiencies, including interest, penalties, attorneysfees, and costs, that Client may incur as a result of a breach by Consultant of any representation or agreement contained in this agreement, and from any negligent act or omission of Consultant, its agents, employees or sub -contractors, resulting in the death or injury of any person or persons including employees of Consultant), or in the damage or destruction of any property or properties, to the extent caused by or connected with negligent acts, errors and omissions during the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or Consultant's agents, employees or sub -contractors. Assignment 4.08. Neither this agreement nor any duties or obligations under this agreement may be assigned by Consultant without the prior written consent of Client. ARTICLE 5. OBLIGATIONS OF CLIENT Cooperation of Client 5.01. Client agrees to comply with all reasonable requests of Consultant and provide access to all documents reasonably necessary to the performance of Consultant's duties under this agreement. Ownership of Plans 5.02. The Client acknowledges the Consultant's construction documents as instruments of professional service. Nevertheless, the plans and specifications prepared under this Agreement shall become the property of the Client upon completion of the work and payment in full of all monies due to the Consultant. The Client shall not reuse or make any modification to the plans and specifications without the prior written authorization of the Consultant. The Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, [o indemnify the hold Consultant harmless from any claim, liability or costs (including reasonable attorneys' fees and defense costs) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized reuse or modification of the construction documents by the Client or any person or entity that acquires or obtains the plans and specifications from or through the Client without the written authorization of the Consultant. -4- ARTICLE 6. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT Termination on Notice 6.01. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, City may (and Consultant may, subject to liability for actual damages incurred to City for completion of contracted work) terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ten (10) days written notice to Consultant. Unless otherwise terminated, this Agreement will continue in force until the services provided for in this agreement have been fully and completely performed. Should contract be so terminated, Consultant shall be entitled to payment of the reasonable value of services completed to the date of termination. Termination on Occurrence of Stated Events 6.02. Without any compromise of Client's right to seek damages permitted tav law, this agreement will terminate automatically on the occurrence of any of the following events: (a) Bankruptcy or insolvency of Consultant (b) Sale of the business of Consultant (c) Assignment of this Agreement by Consultant without the consent of the Client. Termination for Default 6.03. If either party defaults in the performance of this agreement or materially breaches any of its provisions. the non -breaching party may terminate this agreement by giving written notification to the breaching party. Termination will take effect immediately on receipt of notice by the breaching party or five days after mailing of notice. whichever occurs first. For the purposes of this paragraph, material breach of this agreement includes, but is not limited to. the following: (a) Consultant's failure to complete the services specified in the Description of Services. (b) Contractor's material breach of any representation or agreement contained in Paragraph 4.07. (c) Client's material breach of any representation or agreement contained in this agreement. -5- ARTICLE 7. GENERAL PROVISIONS Notices 7.01. Any notices required to be given under this agreement by either party o the other may be effected by personal delivery in writing or by mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid with return receipt requested. Mailed notices must be addressed to the parties at the addresses appearing in the introductory paragraph of this agreement, but each party may change the address by giving written notice in accordance with this paragraph. Notices delivered personally will be deemed communicated as of actual receipt; mailed notices will be deemed communicated as of the day of receipt or the fifth day after mailing, whichever occurs first. Entire Agreement of the Parties 7.02. This agreement supersedes any and all agreements, either oral or vvritten, between the parties with respect to the rendering of services by Consultant for Client and contains all of the representations, covenants, and agreements between the parties with respect to the rendering of those services. Each party to this agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not contained in this agreement, and that no other agreement, statement, or promise promise not contained in this agreement will be valid or binding. Any modification of this agreement will be effective only if it is in writing signed by the party to be charged. Partial Invalidity 7.03. If any provision of this agreement is held by a court of competent lurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will continue in full force and effect without being impaired or invalidated in any way. Arbitration 7.04. Any controversy between the parties to this Agreement involving the construction or application of any of the terms, covenants, or conditions of this Agreement may, upon the mutual consent of the parties hereto, be submitted to arbitration. The arbitration will comply with the be governed by the provisions of the California Arbitration Act, Sections 1280 through 1294.2 of the California Code of Civil Proced ure. Except as maybe otherwise agreed, the parties will each appoint one person to hear and determine the dispute. If those two persons are unable to agree, then they will select a third impartial arbitrator whose decision will be final and conclusive on both parties. The cost of arbitration will be borne in a proportion the arbitrators determine. -6- Attorneys' Fees 7.05. If any legal action based in contract law, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, which may be set by the court in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled. Governing Law 7.06. This agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Executed at San Jacinto, California, on By: By: CLIENT THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO -7- , c,, S A N JACINTO TO: Staff Report. Honorable Mayor & Councilmembers FROM: Les Evans, Director of Public Works via: Lyle W. Alberg, Interim City Manager DATE: March 19, 1996 RE: CONTRACT WITH NBS-LOWRY FOR DESIGN OF SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS Recommendation: Approve the contract with NBS-Lowry for design of sidewalk, curb and gutter on Seventh Street at various locations for CDBG and SB821 grants for a fee of $6,720.00. Acknowledge the grant of $22,500 of SB821 Funds from the Riverside County Transportation Commission and direct the Finance Director to prepare the appropriate budget accounts. Fiscal Impact: The approved 1995-96 budget includes $79,762 for curb, gutter and sidewalk projects at various locations in CDBG Account No, 029-8661-440-4001. In July, 1995, the City was granted $22,500 of SB821 Funds for sidewalk construction on Seventh Street and Santa Fe, adjacent to the Valley High Mobile Home Park. The budget does not reflect this award. Background: Under the 21st Year CDBG allocations, the City of San Jacinto received approval of $79,762 for construction of missing sidewalk, curb and gutter in the area bounded by Main Street, Ramona Boulevard, Santa Fe Avenue at Second Street, and also for sidewalk on West Seventh Street between San Jacinto Avenue and Santa Fe Avenue. The amount of CDBG funds approved were $79,762. In 1995, the City also requested and received approval for $22,500 of SB821 Funds for the construction of sidewalk on Santa Fe Avenue and Seventh Street adjacent to the Valley High Mobile Home Park. Staff Report/NBS-Lowry March 19. 1996 Page Two Proposals for design of the sidewalk and curb and gutter improvements were requested from three local consultants. All proposals were good, however;. NBS-Lowry prepared an excellent proposal for a fee of $6,720. Cozad and Thomsen proposeda. fee of $6,958 and G W Engineering proposed a fee of $7,250. CONTRACT FOR SERVICES This Agreement is made on between THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ("Client"), with a principal place of business at 312 E. Main Street, San Jacinto, CA 92583 and NBS-Lowry ("Consultant"), an independent Consultant, with a principal place of business at 1545 W. Florida Avenue, Hemet, CA 92543 ARTICLE 1. TERM OF CONTRACT 1.01. This agreement will become effective on the date stated above and will continue in effect until terminated as provided in this agreement. ARTICLE 2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT 2.01. Consultant agrees to perform the services specified in the 'Scope of Services" attached to this agreement, as Exhibit ''A", and incorporated into this agreement by reference. Method of Performing Services 2.02. Consultant will determine the method, details, and means of performing the above -described services, and in accordance with the Scope of Services, prepared and presented by Consultant and attached hereto. 2.03. Consultant enters into this agreement, and will remain throughout the term of the agreement, as an independent consultant. Consultant agrees that he is not and will not become an employee, partner, agent, or principal of Client while this agreement is in effect. Consultant agrees that he is not entitled to the rights or benefits afforded to Client's employees, including disability or unemployment insurance, workers' compensation, medical insurance, sick leave, or any other employment benefit. Consultant is responsibie for providing, at his own expense, disability, unemployment, and other insurance, workers' compensation, training, permits, and licenses for himself and for his employees and subcontractors. -1- Payment of Income Taxes 2.04. Consultant is responsible for paving when due all income taxes, including estimated taxes, incurred as a result of the compensation paid by Client to Consultant for services under this Agreement. On request, Consultant will provide Clif ;t with proof of timely payment. Consultant agrees to indemnify Client for any claims, costs, losses, fees, penalties, interest, or damages suffered by Client resulting from Consultant's failure to comply with this provision. Use of Employees or Subcontractors 2.05. Consultant may, at Consultant's own expense, use any employees or subcontractors as Consultant deems necessary to perform the services required of Consultant by this agreement. Client may not control, direct, or supervise Consultant's employees or subcontractors in the performance of those services. Conflict of Interest 2.06 Consultant warrants that it has no interest as would constitute a conflict of interest under City's Resolution No. 2226, adopted pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974, and will comply with any applicable provision of said Resolution. ARTICLE 3. COMPENSATION Maximum Compensation 3.01. In consideration for the services to be performed by Consultant, Client agrees to pay to Consultant hourly compensation pursuant to the "Fee Schedule," attached collectively as Exhibit B. In no event shall total fees for completion of all services. costs, sub -consultants, etc., exceed $6,720.00. Date for Payment of Compensation 3.02. Consultant shall bill monthly for fees incurred and costs so expended in such previous month. City shall pay such billed amounts within 45 days after billing, unless City shall dispute any portion of said billing, in which case, the undisputed portion shall be paid. Any unresolved billing disputes shall be submitted for decision in accordance with Section 7.04 of this Agreement. -2- ARTICLE 4. OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR Non -Exclusive Relationship 4.01. Consultant may represent, perform services for, and contract with as many additional clients, persons, or companies as Consultant, in his sole discretion, sees fit Time and Place of Performing Work 4.02. Consultant may perform the services under this agreement at any suitable time and location he chooses, and in accordance with the Scope of Services, prepared by Consultant and attached to this Agreement. Tools, Materials and Equipment 4.03. Consultant will supply all tools, materials, and equipment required to perform the services under this agreement. Workers' Compensation 4.04. Consultant agrees to provide workerscompensation insurance for Consultant's employees and agents and agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Client for any and all claims arising out of any injury, disability, or death of any of Consultant's employees or agents. Liability Insurance 4.05. Consultant agrees to maintain policies of insurance in the minimum aggregate of $1,000,000 to cover any negligent acts or omissions (including owned and non -owned automobile liability coverage) committed by Consultant or Consultant's employees or agents during the performance of any duties under this agreement. Consultant shall further maintain Errors and Omissions coverage for professional negligence in the minimum amount of $1,000,000. Consultant's Qualification 4.06. Consultant represents that he has the qualifications and skills necessary to perform the services under this agreement in a competent, professional manner, without the advice or direction of Client. This means Consultant is able to fulfill the requirements of this agreement. Failure to perform all the services required under this agreement constitutes a material breach of the agreement. -3- Indemnity 4.07. Consultant agrees to indemnify, and hold Client free and harmless from all losses, costs, expenses, obligations, liabilities, damages, recoveries, and deficiencies, including interest, penalties, attorneysfees, and costs. that Client may incur as a result of a breach by Consultant of any representation or agreement contained in this agreement, and from any negligent act or omission of Consultant, its agents, employees or sub -contractors, resulting in the death or injury of any person or persons (including employees of Consultant), or in the damage or destruction of any property or properties, to the extent caused by or connected with negligent acts, errors and omissions during the performance of this Agreement by Consultant or Consultant's agents, employees or sub -contractors. Assignment 4.08. Neither this agreement nor any duties or obligations under this agreement may be assigned by Consultant without the prior written consent of Client. ARTICLE 5. OBLIGATIONS OF CLIENT Cooperation of Client 5.01. Client agrees to comply with all reasonable requests of Consultant and provide access to all documents reasonably necessary to the performance of Consultant's duties under this agreement. Ownership of Plans 5.02. The Client acknowledges the Consultant's construction documents -3S instruments of professional service. Nevertheless, the plans and specifications orepared under this Agreement shall become the property of the Client upon completion of the work and payment in full of all monies due to the Consultant. The Client shall not reuse or make any modification to the plans and specifications without the prior written authorization of the Consultant. The Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify the hold Consultant harmless from any claim, liability or costs (including reasonable attorneys' fees and defense costs) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized reuse or modification of the construction documents by the Client or any person or entity that acquires or obtains the plans and specifications from or through the Client without the written authorization of the Consultant. -4- ARTICLE 6. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT Termination on Notice 6.01. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, City may (and Consultant may, subject to liability for actual damages incurred to City for completion of contracted work) terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ten (10) days written notice to Consultant. Unless otherwise terminated, this Agreement will continue in force until the services provided for in this agreement have been fully and completely performed. Should contract be so terminated, Consultant shall be entitled to payment of the reasonable value of services completed to the date of termination. Termination on Occurrence of Stated Events 6.02. Without any compromise of Client's right to seek damages permitted oy law. this agreement will terminate automatically on the occurrence of any of the rollowing events: (a) Bankruptcy or insolvency of Consultant (b) Sale of the business of Consultant (c) Assignment of this Agreement by Consultant without the consent of the Client. Termination for Default 6.03. If either party defaults in the performance of this agreement or materially breaches any of its provisions, the non -breaching party may terminate this agreement by giving written notification to the breaching party. Termination will take effect immediately on receipt of notice by the breaching party or five days after mailing of notice, whichever occurs first. For the purposes of this paragraph, material breach of this agreement includes, but is not limited to, the following: (a) Consultant's failure to complete the services specified in the Description of Services. (b) Contractor's material breach of any representation or agreement contained in Paragraph 4.07. (c) Client's material breach of any representation or agreement contained in this agreement. -5- ARTICLE 7. GENERAL PROVISIONS Notices 7.01. Any notices required to be given under this agreement by either party to the other may be effected by personal delivery in writing or by mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid with return receipt requested. Mailed notices must be addressed to the parties at the addresses appearing in the introductory paragraph of this agreement, but each party may change the address by giving written notice in accordance with this paragraph. Notices delivered personally will be deemed communicated as of actual receipt: mailed notices will be deemed communicated as of the day of receipt or the fifth day after mailing, whichever occurs first. Entire Agreement of the Parties 7.02. This agreement supersedes any and all agreements, either oral or written, between the parties with respect to the rendering of services by Consultant for Client and contains all of the representations, covenants, and agreements between the parties with respect to the rendering of those services. Each party to this agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not contained in this agreement, and that no other agreement, statement, or promise promise not contained in this agreement will be valid or binding. Any modification of this agreement will be effective only if it is in writing signed by the party to be charged. Partial Invalidity 7.03. If any provision of this agreement is held by a court of competent orisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will continue rn full force and effect without being impaired or invalidated in any way. Arbitration 7.04. Any controversy between the parties to this Agreement involving the construction or application of any of the terms, covenants, or conditions of this Agreement may, upon the mutual consent of the parties hereto, be submitted to arbitration. The arbitration will comply with the be governed by the provisions of the California Arbitration Act, Sections 1280 through 1294.2 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Except as maybe otherwise agreed, the parties will each appoint one person to hear and determine the dispute. If those two persons are unable to agree, then they will select a third impartial arbitrator whose decision will be final and conclusive on both parties. The cost of arbitration will be borne in a proportion the arbitrators determine. -6- Attorneys' Fees 7.05. If any legal action based in contract law, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, which may be set by the court in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled. Governing Law 7.06. This agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Executed at San Jacinto, California, on By: By: CLIENT THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO CONSULTANT NBS/Lowry Michael J. Stearns, President -7- AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 I 'L ''� � �� z CITY OF SAN JACINTO STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development via Lyle W. Alberg, Interim City Manager DATE: March 19, 1996 SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF DEDICATION OF LOTS 84, 85, AND 86 IN TRACT 21900; AND LOTS 1, 91, AND 92 IN TRACT 21900-1 RECOMMENDATION Accept offers of dedication of subject parcels for open space and landscape and direct the City Clerk to record a Certificate of Acceptance with the County Clerk: BACKGROUND When Tract Maps 21900 and 21900-1 were recorded, the subject lots were dedicated to the public for permnent open space and landscape purposes. As they were not dedicated to the City, they were never accepted by the City. As a result they remain officially owned by private parties until they are accepted by a public entity, The developer. landscaped the lots and the City currently maintains this landscaping through its Lighting. and Landscape Maintenance District. As you know, two of these parcels are up for tax sale in late March. The residents of Soboba Village IV had expressed concern, that an unknown party may buy these parcels and try to develop them. Staff sought advise from the Tax Collector's Office as to how to take them off the tax rolls. They suggested the City accept the dedication. They felt the City represented the public, in this case, because of the landscaping improvements. H:\ccrpt-961Vilege IV.ded RECORDING REQUESTED BY: City of San Jacinto 312 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City Clerk City of San Jacinto 312 E. Main Street San Jacinto, Ca 92583 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE PURPOSES The City of San Jacinto does hereby accept the offer to dedicate Lots 84, 85, and 86 in Tract 21900, found in Book 187 of Maps at Pages 98-101, Records Riverside County. The City of San Jacinto does also accept the offer to dedicate Lots 1, 91, and 92 in Tract 21900-1, found in Book 187 of Maps, at Pages 93-97, Records Riverside County. Moved, passed and adopted by the City Council this day of 1996. Mayor Attest: Deputy City Clerk Certificate The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of , duly adopted by said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein. Deputy City Clerk TJ ASSESSMENT AlffPOSES ONLY o,trio&p fli allf MB 187/98-101 Tract No 21900 ASSESSOR'S MAP BK 433 PG.33 PlveP51,76' COUNTY CALIF. 433-1E 433-32 rR. A. 010-080 POR. RO SAN JACI NTO WEJO (PWSC25,T45. R.I W I THIS MAP fs FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES (IVEY " r c ri so" r VERONA ‘'3119, II 41115" s. : Off 4o %II 454 MB. 187/ 9 3-97 Traci No. 2 19 0 0-1 .55 TR( 55 3 0 (1, 443 ts (1 FAS "'"• tor r 5555 1243355 "?961,49 ASSESSOR 5 MAP 8K 433 PG 32 RIVERS/DE COUNTY CALF STAFF REPORT TO: Fellow Councilmembers FROM: James Conner, Mayor Patrick Williams, Councilmember DATE: March 19, 1996 SUBJECT: Approval of Contract for Services - Interim City Manager RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Contract for Services for Interim City Manager, Lyle Alberg for a monthly rate of $6,500 with no benefits except use of a City vehicle. Contract to be in effect from March 8, 1996 through September 8, 1996 or until the hiring and commencement of services of a new City Manager. BACKGROUND On. March 1st and 2nd Council held Closed Sessions for the purpose of interviewing potential interim City Managers. On March 7th Council held a Closed Session and voted to approve the hiring of Lyle Alberg as an Interim City Manager. The terms of a Contract for Services has been prepared and is attached for approval. CONTRACT FOR SERVICES This Agreement is made on March 8, 1996, between THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, ("Client"), with a principal place of business at 312 East Main Street, San Jacinto, California, and LYLE W. ALBERG ("Contractor"), with a principal place of business at 354 South Harvard, Hemet, California. Recitals: City is in the process of recruiting and hiring a new full time City Manager and desires to retain interim City Manager Services. Contractor is a skilled professional, with 38 years experience managing the affairs of various cities. Contractor now provides services, occasionally as needed, as an Interim City Manager, on an independent contractor basis. City wishes to retain the services of Contractor, as an independent contractor, to perform the services of Interim City Manager on a short term basis, and pending the hiring of City's new City Manager. Agreement: ARTICLE 1. TERM OF CONTRACT 1.01. This agreement will become effective on March 9, 1996, and will continue in effect until the earlier of the following: A. Six Months from the effective date (September 8, 1996). B. The hiring and commencement of services of a new City Manager by the City of San Jacinto. ARTICLE 2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR Specific Services 2.01. Contractor agrees to perform the services specified in the "Description of Services" attached to this agreement and incorporated into this agreement by reference. Method of Performing Services 2.02. Contractor will determine the method, details, and means of performing the above -described services. Status of Contractor 2.03. Contractor enters into this agreement, and will remain throughout the term of the agreement, as an independent contractor. Contractor agrees that he is not and will not become an employee, partner, agent, or principal of Client while this agreement is in effect. Contractor agrees that he is not entitled to the rights or benefits afforded to Client's employees, including disability or unemployment insurance, workers' compensation, medical insurance, sick leave, or any other employment benefit. Contractor is responsible for providing, at his own expense, disability, unemployment, and other insurance, workers' compensation, training, permits, and licenses for herself and for her employees and subcontractors. Payment of Income Taxes 2.04. Contractor is responsible for paying when due all income taxes, including estimated taxes, incurred as a result of the compensation paid by Client to Contractor for services under this Agreement. On request, Contractor will provide Client with proof of timely payment. Contractor agrees to indemnify Client for any claims, costs, losses, fees, penalties, interest, or damages suffered by Client resulting from Contractor's failure to comply with this provision. Use of Employees or Subcontractors 2.05. Contractor may, at Contractor's own expense, use any employees or subcontractors as Contractor deems necessary to perform the services required of Contractor by this agreement. Client may not control, direct, or supervise Contractor's employees or subcontractors in the performance of those services. ARTICLE 3. COMPENSATION 3.01. In consideration for the service to be performed by Contractor, Client agrees to pay to Contractor an amount equal to $6,500.00 per month, which sum shall be paid in bi-weekly pay periods. The amount to be paid shall be payment in full for all services performed under this Agreement and no additional payment shall be due for hours worked in excess of the minimum stated in Section 4.01, hereof. Client shall provide the Contractor with the use of a City vehicle throughout the terms of this Agreement, as additional compensation. 2 ARTICLE 4. OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR Minimum Amount of Service 4.01. Contractor shall devote such time as may be required to perform the services described in this Agreement, and Contractor agrees to devote not less than 80 hours every two weeks in performance of the above -described services. Non -Exclusive Relationship 4.02. Contractor may represent, perform services for, and contract with as many additional clients, persons, or companies as Contractor, in her sole discretion, sees fit. Time and Place of Performing Work 4.03. Contractor may perform the services under this agreement at any suitable time and location he chooses, however he agrees to maintain regular office hours at 312 S. Main Street, San Jacinto, California. Tools, Materials, and Equipment 4.04. Contractor will supply all tools, materials, and equipment required to perform the services under this agreement. Workers' Compensation 4.05. Contractor agrees to provide workers' compensation insurance for Contractor's employees and agents, if any, and agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Client for any and all claims arising out of any injury, disability, or death of Contractor, and any of Contractor's employees or agents. Liability Insurance 4.06. Contractor agrees to maintain a policy of insurance in the minimum amount of $ not applicable to cover any negligent acts or omissions committed by Contractor or Contractor's employees or agents during the performance of any duties under this agreement. Contractor shall maintain automobile liability insurance in a minimum amount of $100,000.00 per person, $300,000.00 aggregate, $.1-00,,0Q0_700 pro erty damage, throughout the term of this Agreement.-4-5,67u' Contractor's Qualification 4.07. Contractor represents that he has the qualifications and skills necessary to perform the services under this agreement in a competent, professional manner, without the advice or direction of Client. This means Contractor is able to fulfill 3 the requirements of this agreement. Failure to perform all the services required under this agreement constitutes a material breach of the agreement. Contractor has complete and sole discretion for the manner in which the work under this agreement will be performed. Indemnity 4.08. Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold Client free and harmless form all claims, demands, losses, costs, expenses, obligations, liabilities, damages, recoveries, and deficiencies, including interest, penalties, attorneys' fees, and costs, that Client may incur as a result of a breach by Contractor of any representation or agreement contained in this agreement. Assignment 4.09. Neither this agreement nor any duties or obligations under this agreement may be assigned by Contractor without the prior written consent of Client. ARTICLE 5. OBLIGATIONS OF CLIENT Cooperation of Client 5.01. Client agrees to comply with all reasonable requests of Contractor and provide access to all documents reasonably necessary to the performance of Contractor's duties under this agreement. Place of Work 5.02. Client agrees to furnish space on Client's premises for use by Contractor while performing the above -described services. As 5.03. Neither this agreement nor any duties or obligations under this agreement may be assigned by Client without the prior written consent of Contractor. ARTICLE 6. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT Termination on Notice 6.01. Notwithstanding any other provision of this agreement, either party may terminate this agreement at any time by giving seventy-two (72) hours written notice to the other 4 party. Unless otherwise terminated as provided in this agreement, this agreement will continue in force until the services provided for in this agreement have been fully and completely performed. Termination on Occurrence of Stated Events 6.02. This agreement will terminate automatically on the occurrence of any of the following events: (a) Bankruptcy or insolvency of either party. (b) Death of Contractor. (c) Assignment of this agreement by either party without the consent of the other party. Termination for Default 6.03. If either party defaults in the performance of this agreement or materially breaches any of its provisions, the non - breaching party may terminate this agreement by giving written notification to the breaching party. Termination will take effect immediately on receipt of notice by the breaching party or five days after mailing of notice, whichever occurs first. For the purposes of this paragraph, material breach of this agreement includes, but is not limited to, the following: (a) Client's failure to pay Contractor any compensation due within thirty (30) days after written demand for payment. (b) Contractor's failure to complete the services specified in the Description of Services. (c) Contractor's material breach of any representation or agreement contained in Paragraph 4.07. (d) Client's material breach of any representation or agreement contained in this Agreement. ARTICLE 7. GENERAL PROVISIONS No 7.01. Any notices required to be given under this agreement by either party to the other may be effected by personal delivery in writing or by mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid with return receipt requested. Mailed notices must be addressed to the parties at the addresses appearing in the introductory paragraph of this agreement, but each party may change the 5 address by giving written notice in accordance with this paragraph. Notices delivered personally will be deemed communicated as of actual receipt; mailed notices will be deemed communicated as of the day of receipt or the fifth day after mailing, whichever occurs first. Entire Agreement of the Parties 8.02. This agreement supersedes any and all agreements, either oral or written, between the parties with respect to the rendering of services by Contractor for Client and contains all of the representations, covenants, and agreements between the parties with respect to the rendering of those services. Each party to this agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises, or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not contained in this agreement, and that no other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this agreement will be valid or binding. Any modification of this agreement will be effective only if it is in writing signed by the party to be charged. Partial Invalidity 8.03. If any provision of this agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will continue in full force and effect without being impaired or invalidated in any way. Payment of Moneys Due Deceased Contractor 8.04. If Contractor dies before completing the services under this agreement, any moneys due Contractor from Client under this agreement as of the date of death will be paid to the Contractor's executors, administrators, heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns. Arbitration 8.05. Any controversy between the parties to this agreement involving the construction or application of any of the terms, covenants, or conditions of this agreement will, on the written request of one party served on the other, be submitted to arbitration. The arbitration will comply with and be governed by the provisions of the California Arbitration Act, Sections 1280 through 1294.2 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. The parties will each appoint one person to hear and determine the dispute. If those two persons are unable to agree, then they will select a third impartial arbitrator whose decision will be final and conclusive on both parties. The cost of 6 arbitration will be borne in a proportion the arbitrators determine. Attorneys' Fees 8.06. If any legal action based in contract law, including an action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret the provisions of this agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees, which may be set by the court in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled. Governing Law 8.07. This agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Executed at San Jacinto, California, on CLIENT THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO 7-:"•.\ (-NI\ By: C -., By: 7 CONTRACTOR CITY OF SAN JACINTO JOB DESCRIPTION PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT CITY MANAGER JOB SUMMARY To coordinate the overall administrative activities and operations of the City and to advise and assist the City Council exercising independent judgment and initiative. Policy direction is provided by the City Council. Responsibilities include the direct and indirect supervision of department heads and other personnel as assigned. REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES Direct and participate to the development and implementation of goals, objectives, policies, and procedures. Direct and participate, with department head cooperation, in the preparation and administration of the City budget. Plan, organize, and direct the financial planning, administration, and purchasing activities of the City. Plan and develop accounting procedures for bookkeeping and processing of claims, expenditures, purchases, budget data, salary warrants and receipts. Review contracts and determine that expenditures are made in accordance with terms of the contract. Prepare lone term plans of capital improvements with plans for their financing. Confer with department heads concerning administrative and operational problems, make appropriate decisions or recommendations. Prepare and submit to the City Council reports of finances and administrative activities, keep City Council advised of financial conditions, program progress. and present the future needs of the City. Oversee the enforcement of all City ordinances. Direct the preparation of plans and' specifications for work which the City Council orders. Interprets, analyzes, and explains policies, procedures, and programs. Confer with residents, taxpayers, businesses, and other individuals, groups, and outside agencies having an interest or potential interest in affairs of City concern. Respond to the most difficult complaints and requests for information. Represent the City in the community and at professional meetings as required. Coordinate City activities with other governmental agencies and outside organizations. Perform all duties as may be prescribed by City Council action. Select, supervise, train, and evaluate assigned staff Perform related duties as assigned. KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, AND ABILITIES Knowlesze of: Modern municipal administrative methods and procedures, organizations, and functions. Current social, political, and economic trends and operating problems of municipal government. Applicable federal and state laws, rules, and regulations regarding local government operations. Budget preparation, program analysis, and review forecasting. Principles of effective public relations and interrelationships with community groups and agencies, private businesses, and firms and other levels of government. Ability to: Provide effective leadership and coordinate the activities of a large municipal organization. Analyze, interpret, summarize, and present administrative and technical information and data in an effective manner. Appraise situations and people accurately and quickly and adopt an effective course of action. Prepare varied financial statements, reports, and analyses. Serve effectively as the administrative agent of the City Council. Select, supervise, train, and evaluate staff. QUALIFICATIONS Education ok- ree from an accredited college or university with major work in public administration or a closely related field. Experience Ekgfl[ years of progressively responsible experience in an administrative, managerial, or staff capacity in public or private employment, involving the responsibility for the planning, organization, implementation and supervision of varied work programs. d STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John Herrera, Finance Director Via: Lyle Alberg, Interim City Manager DATE: March 19, 1996 RE: Job Descriptions and Classifications for Customer Service Rep 1/II/III and Accountant RECOMMENDATION: It is respectfully requested that the City Council approve job descriptions and classifications and establish salary ranges in the Miscellaneous Group (MISC) as follows: Job Description/Classification Range Monthly Salary Range Customer Service Rep I: MISC-27 $1,304-$1,589 Customer Service Rep II: MISC-35 $1,589-$1,936 Customer Service Rep III: MISC-43 $1,936-$2,359 Accountant: Contract $20-$25 Per Hour BACKGROUND: Customer Service Rep I/11/111 The Customer Service Representative I and II positions are reflected in the Finance Department budget for 1995-96. The Customer Service Representative I position was not funded for 1995-96 as a result of the Council Budget Committee's budget reductions. The Customer Service Representative II position is funded for a full year and paid 50% from the Water Fund and 50% from the Sewer Fund. The Customer Service Representative III is a new job description for the City. The Customer Service Representative 11I job description is requested to complete the Customer Service Representative series and to offer advancement opportunities to Finance Department staff as they meet the qualifications for that position. The recommended salary ranges for the Customer Service Representative series are as presented above. [C:\...AGENDAS\031996.JOBI Accountant As part of the Finance Department restructuring, staff is requesting that the Accountant job description be added to the City's classification manual The Accountant is a professional -level position which will assist the City in the efficient maintenance of the general ledger, the timely reconciliation of accounts and the analysis of accounting transactions. In the current 1995-96 fiscal year, the Finance Department budget includes roughly $4,800 for general ledger accounting support through the balance of the fiscal year. The Accountant position is approved in the budget as a contract, part-time temporary position with no benefits with a salary of $20-25 per hour. The recommended hourly range for the Accountant is as presented above. The Accountant would be hired in at $20 per hour. [C:\...AGENDAS\031996.JOB] 2 CITY OF SAN JACINTO PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT JOB DESCRIPTION Adopted 3/19/96 CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE I CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE II JOB SUMMARY Under general direction of the Finance Director, to perform a wide variety of typing and general clerical work of a routine nature; performs related duties as required. REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES Customer Service Representative I (CSRI) is the entry level for clerical employees required to have basic skills, but no previous clerical experience. Employees in this class normally work under close and continuous supervision performing repetitive or closely related duties according to established procedures. While a variety of tasks may be assigned, each step usually fits a pattern which has been established and explained before work is started. Generally, work is observed and reviewed both during its performance and upon completion. Changes in procedure or exceptions to rules are explained in detail as they arise. The class of Customer Service Representative I can also be utilized as a recruiting and training class for different specialty clerical areas. Designated positions will require that the incumbent possess adequate typing skills to perform successfully on the job. Customer Service Representative II (CSRII) is the class which is normally filled by advancement from the lower class of Customer Service Representative I, or, when filled from the outside, requires prior clerical experience. Customer Service Representative II works under general supervision and, within a framework of established procedures, is expected to perform a wide variety of general clerical duties with only occasional instruction or assistance. Satisfactory performance at this level requires a knowledge of departmental procedures and precedents, and the ability to choose among alternatives in solving problems. A Customer Service Representative II is expected to work productively even in the absence of a supervisor or lead worker. Employees in this class may often have contact with the public, answering a variety of procedural questions, or giving out factual information. Work is normally reviewed only on completion and for overall results. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES Depending on assignment, duties may include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Types a variety of documents in draft and final form, such as correspondence, standard forms, charts, and reports using standard electric typewriter or work processing equipment; types from written, recorded, or printed sources and/or oral instructions; proofreads materials for correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation. 2. Prepares, validates, processes, and/or checks a variety of documents and records, such as time -sheets, invoices, confirming requisitions, and public notices for completeness, accuracy, and submission standards; compiles and records fiscal and statistical data according to established procedures; may keep petty cash. 3. Receives the public and answers calls; determines how incoming calls should be routed; directs people to appropriate offices; answers routine questions; explains routine procedures, processes, or departmental activities; distributes and explains forms, such as applications or permits; obtains routine factual information to create or update client/work unit files; provides routine assistance. 4. Compiles routine reports by extracting and/or tabulating information from a variety of sources, such as files, correspondence, meeting notes, logs, previous reports, and/or oral instruction. 5. Recommends and assists in implementing office programs and clerical systems, procedures, and policies. 6. Provides temporary and vacation relief in similar occupations fields as necessary. 7. CSR II's may be asked to assist with the monthly/utility billing process. 8. May be asked to handle cash and reconcile cash register. 9. Perform other duties as assigned and as determined by management. EDUCATION/EXPERIENCE Customer Service Representative Any combination of education and/or experience that has provided the knowledge, skills and abilities necessary for satisfactory job performance. Example combinations include graduation from high school or equivalent, including or supplemented by courses in typing and office practices. Customer Service Representative II: Any combination of education and/or experience that has provided the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary for satisfactory job performance. Example combinations include graduation from high school or equivalent, and one year of experience in related clerical work, involving a variety of typing and/or office operation responsibilities; including or supplemented by training in the clerical occupational field. KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES Customer Service Representative I: Working knowledge of general office methods and procedures; office equipment operations. Skill in the operation of office equipment, including operation of a word processor at 40 net wpm with no more than 10 errors. The City of San Jacinto uses Word Perfect for Windows as their word processing software. Ability to use correct English grammar, punctuation, and spelling; alphabetize or numerically/chronologically sort materials; politely and tactfully receives the public in person or over the phone; establish and maintain cooperative working relationships. Customer Service Representative II: Working knowledge or related office methods and procedures; office equipment operation. Skill in the operation of a variety of office equipment, including word processor at a 40 net wpm with no more than 10 errors. The City of San Jacinto uses Word Perfect for Windows as their word processing software. Ability to use correct English grammar, punctuation, and spelling; understand and follow verbal and written directions; politely and tactfully receives the public in person or over the phone; apply and explain regulations, policies, and procedures; maintain records and perform specific program activities; establish and maintain cooperative working relationships. Must possess and maintain an appropriate valid California Driver's License. CITY OF SAN JACINTO PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT JOB DESCRIPTION Adopted 3/19/96 CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE III JOB SUMMARY Under general direction of the Finance Director, to perform a variety of difficult and complex duties requiring considerable program knowledge, technical evaluation of information, the use of advanced clerical skills, and which may include leading the work of others engaged in clerical activity; performs related duties as required. CLASS CHARACTERISTICS This class is distinguished from the lower level of Customer Service Representative II by requiring the use of advanced clerical and basic technical administrative evaluation/coordination skills, and from the secretarial series by the lack of emphasis placed on the provision of direct clerical/secretarial support to an administrator. REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES Depending on assignment, duties may include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Performs complex clerical/technical work involving the examination and evaluation of a variety of source materials and thorough knowledge of the policies, procedures, and applicable regulations to complete work. 2. Compiles information to support departmental programs or recommendations for change in departmental procedures, policies, and programs; sorts, calculates, and summarizes various data; prepares and maintains operating, personnel, and other records. 3. Politely and tactfully gives information to the public and interdepartmental representatives which requires judgment and interpretation of technical information, laws, policies, and procedures pertinent to area of specialization. 4. Prepares a variety of documents from written or recorded sources; operates a standard typewriter or word processing equipment in the preparation of documents. The City of San Jacinto currently uses Word Perfect for Windows as their wordprocessing software and Quatro Pro or Excel for spreadsheets. 5. Recommends and assists in implementing office programs and clerical systems, procedures, and policies. 6. May assist in budgeting, inventory control, and purchasing review processes for assigned work unit. 7. May lead or provide general supervision to other clerical or program support personnel. 8. Provides temporary and vacation relief in similar occupational fields as necessary. 9. Assists with the technical aspects of the utility billing system. 10. Perform other duties as assigned and as determined by management. EDUCATION/EXPERIENCE Any combination of education and/or experience that has provided the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary for satisfactory job performance. Example combinations include graduation from high school or equivalent, and three years of related, progressively responsible clerical work requiring the application of policies and procedure, including or supplemented by courses in typing and office practices. KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES Considerable knowledge of office methods and practices; organization function, policies and procedures of the assigned and related work units; office equipment operations. Working knowledge of related laws ordinances, rules, and regulations; methods and techniques of supervision. Skill in the operation of a variety of office equipment, including wordprocessing operation at a rate of 50 net wpm with no more than 10 errors. The City of San Jacinto currently uses Word Perfect for Windows as their wordprocessing software and Quatro Pro or Excel for spreadsheets. Ability to use judgment in the application of department policies and procedures; lead and coordinate the work of others involved in related activity; work effectively in the absence of supervision; communcate effectively both orally and in writing; explain related laws, ordinances, rules and regulations, policies and procedures; use correct English grammar, punctuation, and spelling, and edit for inconsistencies in grammar, punctuation, and spelling; establish ad maintain cooperative working relationships. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Must possess and maintain an appropriate valid California Driver's License. CITY OF SAN JACINTO PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT ACCOUNTANT JOB SUMMARY JOF3 DESCRIPTION Adopted 3/19/96 Under general direction of the Finance Director, to perform professional accounting work. The individual will participate in the maintenance of ledger, the preparation of financial statement worksheets, monthly financial position reports; assist in periodic audits of cash, and do related work as required. REPRESENTATIVE DUTIES Duties may include, but are not limited to, the following: Maintain journals and general ledgers of financial transactions, and prepare analytical reports on revenues and expenditures. Preparation of monthly journal entries. Maintenance of fixed asset ledgers, including tagging, transfers, and periodic physical inventory. Assist in the preparation of the annual operating budget. Assist the auditors in the annual review of the City's financial records and statements. Periodic billing of CDBG projects and other miscellaneous accounts receivables, as necessary. Preparation of annual street report and State Controller's Report. Reconciliation of monthly bank statements. Preparation of daily revenue reports and ledgers. Perform other duties, as assigned and as determined by management. KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES Principles and procedures of accounting, budgeting, auditing, computer systems and financial analysis; principles and practices of governmental and commercial accounting, and the applicability of computerized processing procedures; knowledge of Public Finance administration and rules and regulations to specific accounting and financial transactions. Understand and apply laws; implement new and improved computer processing procedures to increase efficiency; prepare financial statements in accordance with the GAAFR restatement and assume independent responsibility for the ledgers and journal entry system; and establish and maintain effective work relationships with supervisors, employees, and the public. EDUCATION AND/OR EXPERIENCE Education and/or experience (see below) that has provided the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary for satisfactory job performance. Example combinations include graduation from an accredited college or university with a bachelor's degree in accounting, finance, business, or closely related field; and progressively responsible professional experience in governmental accounting work. Although experience may be substituted for degree, a degree alone, without the extensive and satisfactory work experience, will not provide the required background for this position. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS Must possess and maintain an appropriate vaid California Driver's License. OURAM1 11112611. ol San Jacinto Ni' 010 BENERAL FUND DEPT/DIV 1700 COMM. DEVLP.-PLANNING/ • ['AGE 5811 OF YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING FERYOD 07/1996 ELE OBJ ACCOUNT ***4*****CURRENT***%****** **K*******YEAR-TO-DATEK4i. ANNUAL 13i-tat-Im8. SUB DESCRIVIION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXF BUDGET ACTUAL. XEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BrAT 0 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 7 PLANNINO 10 PERSONNEL BENEFITS 10 01 SALARIES -FULL TIME 17020 32511.13 102 124796 132546.05 106 .00 213935 813ee.1.5 1Livi..byLL 11 10 FRINGE BENEFITS 15 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION 20 INS PREM - LTD II EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 21 SUFPLiES 21 10 OFFICE SOPFLLES/EOSIASE 30 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL 30 90 PROHESSIONAL-DTHER 3401 9200.69 271 23007 30066.42 .160 .00 40617 2750.56 93 2223 3239.89 146 15561 16200.30 104 .00 26680 10479.70 61 31.9 415.12 130 2233 1859.70 B3 .00 3031 1971:36 -49 5943 12063.70 217 41601 56126.42 135 .00 71328 15201.50 79 333 172.03 52 2331 1120.19 48 542 500.00 92 3794 3477.50 92 .00 . 00 4000 2071.81 26 6500 3022.50 54 31 TRAVEL 6 MEETING COSI5 31 15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 13 .00 0 91 .00 0 .00 150 150.00 0 20 CONE/SEMINARS/WORKSHOP 109 .00 0 763 47.50 6 .00 1305 1257.50 4 31. 414 TRAVEL 6 mrETINb COST122 .00 o 954 47.50 6 .00 1455 1407.50 33 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 43 lo i:/m4quiLia0os 34 CONTRACT SERVICES 34 05 MISC 11101RACTS 42 .00 0 294 4.06.75 itt 43.05 52 . 00 500 393,25 21 581 612.04 140 .00 1000 1E37.96 01 35 UTILITY SERVICE. 35 10 ITIILITIES-WATER 0 0.50 .60 0 0 0 .00 0 9.50- 0 17 MOBILE TELEPHONE 50 51.914 104 350 230.35 66 600 369.65 38 35 wg UTILITY SERVICE 50 51.90 104 350 236.05 60 600 361.15 40 36 OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 36 25 ADVER1ISIN0 L7 -,44f *4 PLANNING 1.0 )4,4 *4 1'ENER8L OOVEM ENT IV 1700 TOTAL PLANNING EFT :1.7 TOTAL COMM. DEVLP.-PLANNING 63 .00 0 501. .00 0 .00 1000 1000.00 0 25026 46141.69 189 175102 194404.10 111 .00 (.,0-.311:1 105033.90 65 556:,4, 46141.89 169 1751/12 194401.10 111 .00 300318 105833.90 65 25026 46141.69 104 175192 194964.10 111 .00 300316 105933.90 65 25026 46141.69 184 175192 194464.10 111 .00 300318 105833;96 65 diGRAM: 0M2671-_, ty ofSan J to 58X OF YEAR !-,Ny'SED ACCOUNTING FERI01'-7/1996 1ND 010 GENERAL FUND DEPT/DIV 2500 NON -DEPARTMENTAL/ ELE. OBJ ACCOUNT a,agmaa.1****CURRENT********** **********yEAN=TOLJIATr:i****** -ARNITA-E 1B SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL %EXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBR, BUDGET BALANCE .$DGT 20 COMMUNITY SERVICES 5 GENERAL SERVICES 21 21 10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1250 011.67 65 8750 402238 46 .00 15000 10977.62 27 30 RR0PESSIONAL/1E1.UNICAL 30 90 PR0E-OTHER 2400 .00 0 17416 16771.16 94 .00 29850 31 TRAVEL & HEETINU COSTS 31 20 CONE/SEMINARS/TUITIONS 1059 .00 0 7413 4131.50 56 .00 12710 057E1.50 33 33 REFIi< HAINTEAANCE 33 10 R/M-1U1LDIN00 567 .00 0 3969 263337 66 .00 61105 4171.60 39 34 RENTAL & coNTRAti :-ERG/CL 34 05 CONTRACT SERVICES 5765 5295.95 92 40355 45007.53 114 .00 69100 23296.47 66' 35 UTILIvy sEkvicr 35 10 0111_1:V1ES-W6TER 21 6.01 32 147 255.03 .174 .00 250 5.03- 102 12 UTILITIES-005 125 .00 0 875 164.36 .1.9 .00 1500 1335.64 11 14 01ILITIES-EDISOH 917 .00 0 64/9 8282.08 1.29 .00 11000 2717.92 75 16 TELEPHONE 1674 1069.71 64 11710 9205.76 79 .00 20090 10804.24 46 35 NN UTILITY SERVICE 2737 1076.52 39 19159 17900.03 94 .00 32840 14931.97 ' 55 ___ 36 OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 36 25 ADVERTISING 0 .00 0 0 623.03 0 .00 0 623.03- 0 13518.84 55 37 INSURANCE/DONUS 37 05 INSURANCE 458 .00 0 3206 2107,00 60 .00 5500 3313.00 40 40 CAPITAL OUVLAYS 40 45 CAP -MACHINERY & EPUIPMEHT 2271 .00 0 15097 .00 0 .00 27250 27250.00 0 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 10 INTER -FUND TRANSFERS OUT 7258 .00 0 50806 07096.00 T71 .00 07096 .00 100 25 M* 14t GENERAL SERVICES 23053 7184.14 30 166971. 100915.9 100 .00 206231. 105415.05 63 20** 44,* 60MUNIiY SERVICES 23E353 7184.14 30 166971 180815.95 108 .00 206271 105415.05 63 TV 2500 TOTAL NON-DEPAR1MENTAL 23853 7104.i4 30 166971 i80815.95 100 .00 206231 105415.0g 63 EP1 25 101AL ikatiaNitikK NON -DEPARTMENTAL 231153 7104.14 30 1401 190015.95 1,00 .00 286231 loF;41r:7S- --61 4 :OGRAM: UM2671_ tr of San Jacinto 5614 OF YEAR LAPSED rmuE iu ACCOUNTING PERIOD 0771996 1Np 010 GENERAL FUND DEFT/DIV 3100 PUBLIC SAFETY/ ELE OEM ACCOUNT 4***Afe***CURRENT********** **********YEAR-TO-DATE*****.Ki. ANNUAL UNENCUMD. X SUB DESCRIPTION BUDOET ACTUAL %EXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCLIMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BDOT so P1161..IC SAFETY PUBLLC__SAFETY 10 PERSONNEL BENEFITS e 10 01 GALARIES-FULL 111117. 113110 186630.49 165 791770 713277.64 90 .00 1357317 614044.16 53 1 1 02 SALARIES -OVERTIME 7167 13179.19 184 50169 54423.17 109 .00 86000 31576.83 63 10 ion KR5ONNEL DENET1TS 120277 i97069.60 16,, 841937 767696.01 91 .00 1443717 675670:99 53 11 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11 10 FRINGE BENEFITS 17429 24670.93 142 122003 148567.73 122 .00 209149 60560.27 71 ' , . 15 RETIREMENT CONTRIDUVION 4072 9930.95 244 29504 8545.36- 30-- .00 48661 57406.36 18- 17 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 2563 4902.30 191 17941 17469.60 97 .00 30750 13200.20 57 20 INS EREM-LTB 5644 5824.95 :103 39500 33514.47 85 .00 67724 34209.E8 b0 11 i,* EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 29709 45377.03 153 207956 171026.59 92 .00 356403 165456.41 54 21 SUPPLIES 21 10 OFFICE SUPPLIES/POSTAGE 1250 23.33 2 9750 3729.56 36.00 43 .00 15000 11270.44 25 11 PRISONER MEALS 25 261.20 13 .00 0 175 22 .00 300 13 K-9 E13353.7- 765- 5ni 602.00 11000 004 .00 39.00 6014 ANIMAL L CONTRO.00 0 501 6.00 1 :oo 994.00 1 15 BOOKS 250 575.92 230 1750 1502.42 90 .00 1000 16 RANGE surpriEs 500 22.72 5 3500 77.00 2f1000 1417.59 53 00 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 18 EMERGENCY SUPPLIES, 17 FLARES 83 42 63 .00 .00 .00 0 o 0 581 294 591 950.04 164 14.90 .00 0 5 .00 1000 1000 500 5923.00----1 1=.1.(C) 0 3 35 UNIFORMS & SAFETY EOUIP. 1250 430.95 35 0750 10 1.5000 49.96 95 4171.99 .00 10820.11 20 50 SUPPLY-R/11 BLDG & STRUCTR 58 336.70 581 406 396.11 50 700 303.89 57 60 POSTABE & FREIGHT 292 139.73 48 971.51 10 .00 .00 2523.46- 28 70 AUTOMOTIVE GAS/DIESEL 2167 340.75 16 2044 3500 15169 12333.00 01 .00 26000 00 SMALL. FOOLS/EOUTPMENT 93 1000 .00 0 591 536.77 92 .00 95 SUPPL3'-PH1:1TO 333 .00 0 2331 953,01 41 .00 4000 90 SUPPLIES OTHER 42 .00 0 291 266.40 91 , 6624 1924.53 29 46360 26632.44 57 :n 21 )4,4 SUPPLIES79= 13667.00 47 463.23 54 3046.99 24 233.60 53 52667.56 34 .30 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL 30 15 PHOTO PROCESSING 53 59.49 177 231 184.41 00 .00 400 215.59 46 16 PROFESSIONAL DUES 67 10.00 15 469 460.00 90 .00 BOO 340.00 59 17 PRISONER MEDICAL 125 .00 0 B75 497.65 56 .00 1500 1012.35 33 19 VETERINARIAN _ 93 .00 0 501 110.00 19 .00 1000 890.00 11 19 PRISONER/BOOKING 2417 .00 0 16919 8721.60 56 .00 29000 20278.40 30 90 PROF -OTHER 833 .00 0 5831 4934.69 85 .00 10000 5065.31 49. 30 44): PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL 355e 69.16 2 .,_ 24906 14999.35 60 .00 42700 27601.65 35 31 TRAVEL 6 MEETING COSTS 31 15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 25 .00 0 175 .00 0 .00 300 300.00 0 17 ACO TRAINING 42 .00 0 294 .00 0 .00 500 500.00 ' 20 CONE/SEMINARS/WORKSHOPS 292 202.00 69 2044 624.33 31 .00 3500 2875.67 18 25 P.0.S.1. REIMBURSABLE. 3750 905.40 24 26250 6274.40 24 .00 45000 38725.60 14 31 1+44 TRAVEL. 6 MEEJING COSTS 4109 1107.40 27 20763 6099.73 74 .00 49300 42401.27 14 33 REPAIR.& MAINTENANCE 33 10 R/M -BUILDINGS 167 50.00 30 11.69 2552.25 218 .00 2666 RUGRAM : 0M2 6%1_ ltv of San ''' nt0 581: OF YEAR;,, LAPSED I1,1.. 11 ACCUI.INTI NG F'ERT:i77 07/1996 UND 010 GENERAL FUND IA ELF OBJ ACCOUNT UB SUB DESCRIPTION DEFT/DIV 31.00 PUBLIC SAFETY/ 44-444w44.44rURPENI'■4*** r)ru*w x*rw*rrwYEAR--TO-LI TF74*14***,* ANNUL UNENLUMB. BUDOET ACTUAL KEXP BUDGET ACTUAL %EXF' ENCL.IMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BOOT 130 PUBLIC SAFETY 131 PUBLIC SAFETY 33 REPAIR 8 NAINFENANCE -- 11 RADIO/RADAR REPAIR 250 .00 0 1750 932.70 53 .00 3000 2067.30 31 50 R & M - MOTOR VEHICLES 3750 85.00 2 26250 13523.64 52 .00 45000 31476.36 30 44 REPAIR & 11A1NFLI4ANCE 41.67 175.00 3 29.169 1700E.59 50 .00 70000 32991:41 - 34 34 VEFIICLES/EOUIF'MEN1 34 0 CONTRACT SERVICES G064 4007.97 51 56440 70101.76 138 .00 96771 18669.24---131--" --- 06 MID-CUUNTY WAN 3311 179.20 5 23177 3702E1.65 160 .00 39731 2702.35 93 11 IOWINI3 125 .0o 0 875 499.00 57 .00 1500 1001.00 33 50 VEH1(LE6--RENT/LkASF:S `703 .00 0 39921 68430.00 171 .00 60430 .00-- 10U -34 *w VEI-II(I ES/EOLIIFMENT 17203 4267..17 25 12042.1 104059.41 15.3 .00 206432 22372.59 09 3:5 UFILI`f( SERVILE 33 10 UTILITIES -WATER 63 30.35 48 441 455.55 103 .00 750 294.45 61 12 UTIL..ITIES-GAS 67 .00 0 469 163.17 35 .00 800 636.03 20 14 UTILI 11E:9- tbi8oN 6' S .00 0 4375 6574.94 1.50 .00 7500 92.5.06..._ 0S 16 TELEPHONE 2333 769.12 33 16331 13601.06 84 .00 20000 14318.94 49 17 CELLULAR PHONES 1125 980.75 70 7875 3775.10 10 .00 13500 9724.90 28 3: 44 UTILITY SERVICE .4213- 16110.22 40 - 29491 24649.02 84 .00 50550 25900:18--_�9 "_-- 36 OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 36 10 FR.LNTING/PIINI .ICAFI(]PI 346 .00 0 212409.19 20 .00 4.15E 3660:8I-__42-_-" 2C2) ADVERFISINO 83 .00 0 581 000.00 130 .00 1000 200.00 80 .. *4 OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 429 .00 0 3003 12E19.19 43 .00 5150 3060.81 25 40 CAPITAL OUTLAYS 40 4.. CAF'-MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 1417 1.109.66 78 9919 16209.66 163 .00 17000 790.34 95 131. +ea. ** P801...IC 501 LIT 191705 25339.1.7 133 1341935 1.150368. 93 .00 2300432 1.050063.21 54 1130 ** ** F'UbLIC: SAFETY 191765 255339.1/ 133 1341935 1.250380.79 93 .00 2300432 1050063.21- -54 DIV 3100 TOTAL *4***** POL 1 C t DEP AR I i TEN f 19005 ' i -i33'? . 1'7 133 1341935 1250360.79 93 .00 23004: 2 1.050063.21 LIEP I 31 '1 OTAL ******* FLIC+LIL SAFETY - _- "-- 19i70tt -_- 2E511 ' 134193S 1250368.79 93 .00 2300432 10b0063..1 ODRAMt 8M2671. ty of San Jacinio 50% OF YEAR LAPSED ACCOHNljNG PERIOD 07/1996 ND 010 GENERAL FUND DEPT/DIV 3200 FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY/ ELE UBJ ACCOUNT 4******$*CURRENT%***ouTilks** *.*********YEAR-TO-DATE***4* ANNUAL UNENCUMB. SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ' ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL %EXF' ENCUMDR. BUDGET BALANCE BEIGT f0 PUBLIC SAFETY 4 PUBLIC SAFE TY 10 PERSONNEL F1ENEF1TS 10 01 5ALARIES-FULL TIME. 8787 .00 0 61509 116602.01 190 .00 105448 11154.81- 111 02 8ALAR1ES-0VERT1ME 2016 .00 0 14112 30471.44 216 .00 24189 6282.44- 126 10 44 PERSONNEL BENEFITS 16803 .00 0 75621 147074.25 195 .00 129637 17437.25- 1.14 11 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11 10 FRINGE BENEFITS 3557 .00 6 24899 39342.23 150 .00 42605 3342.77 -12 15 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION 2724 .00 0 19068 21299.83 112 .00 32687 11387.15 65 17 yil..FFq4:m ALLOWANCE 350 .00 0 2450 1929.00 79 .00 4200 2271.00 46 ' 20 INS PREM-LID 674 .00 0 4718 4730.64 100 .00 8091 11 *4 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 7305 .00 0 51135 67301.72 132 .00 07663 20361.20 * '77 21 SUPPLIES 21 10 OFFICE SUPFLIES/FUS1AGE 136 424.20 312 952 1756.95 185 .00 1633 123.95- 108 10 EMERGENCY SUPPLIES 72. .00 0 504 75.00 15 .00 867 792.00 9 30 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL. 14 .00 0 98 .00 0 .00 167 167.00 0 35 UNIFORMS & SAFETY EMU.. 313 .00 0 2191 2326.61 106 .00 3750 1423.39 62 70 AUTOMOTIVE GAS/DIESEL ,.._ 06 .00 0 602 1262.25 210 .00 :1.033 229.29- 122 BO SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT 19 0 133 122.00 92 .00 233 111.00 52 90 SUPPLIES OTHER 28 .00 0 196 .00 0 .00 333 333.00 0 21 44 SUPPLIES 668 424.20 64 4676 5542.85 119 .00 0016 2473.15 69 '30 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL 30 90 PROF -OTHER . 261 .00 0 1827 1749.17 96 .00 3133 1303.03 56 31 TRAVEL & MEETING COSTS 31 20 CONF/SEMINARS/WORKSHOPS 67 .00 0 469 .00 0 .00 799 799.00 0 33 REPAIR # MAINTENANCE. 33 10 R/M-BUILDIN1)S 190 .00 0 1330 1291.65 97 .00 2275 983.35 57 '30 R/M-EOUIENENT 17 .00 0 119 126.17 106 .00 201 74.83 63 50 R & M - MOTOR VEHICLES 520 .00 0 3696 5800.47 157 .00 6333 532.53 92 33 44 REPAIR I. MAINTENANCE 735 .00 0 5145 7210.29 140 .00 ee09 :1.590.71 82 34 VEMICLES/EGUIPMENT 34 05 CONTRACT SERVICES 39548 .00 0 276836 966.68 0 .00 474576 473609.32 0 35 UTILITY SERVICE 35 10 UTILITIES -WATER 21 .00 0 147 .00 0 .00 250 250.00 0 12 UTILITIES -OAS -,.- ,, ,,.00 0 175 84.96 49 .00 300 215.04 28 14 UTILIT1E6-EDISON 635 .00 0 4445 6083.04 137 .00 7617 1533.96 80 16 TELEPHONE. 167 .00 0 1169 1026.45 88 .00 2000 973.55 51 35 ** UFILITY SERVICE 048 .00 0 5936 7194.45 121 .00 10167 36 OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 36 25 ADVERTISING 15 .00 0 133 .00 0 .00 233 :...:60 6 31 ** PUDLiC SAFETY 60254 424.20 1 421778 237047.41 56 ' .00 723033 485985.59 33 60254 424.20 1 421778 237047.41 56 .00 723033 405905.59 33 30 ift* *44 PUBLIC SAFETY r Host 13 RUGF:AM. GMt' 5BY. OF- YEAR•: 4FSED ACCOUNTING FFRICry7/:L99h itv of San nt0 LINL 010 GENERAL.. FUND LEFT/DIV 3200 FIRE AN LIFE SAFETY/ A ELL OI3J - _ __.... ACCOUNT __— u.******* t.URT ENT* *+rVEAR-TO--DATE`****** UN SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXF ENCUMDR. BUDGET BALANCE BIM i:F V 3200 TOTAL ******* FIRE ANNUAL - UNENCLUh I x 60254 424.20 1 421778 237047.41 5h .00 723033 485985.59 OGRA0: 011267L iv of San Jacinto IJWiLJL41-1 Ist-11-11t1 58Y. OF YEAR LAPSED t'AGE, 11 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 ND 010 GENERAL FOND DEPT/DIV 3210 FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY/FIRE PREVENTION ELE OBJ ACCOUNT *********CURRENT********** 1.6tioilk*****YEAR-TO-DA1F******* ANNUAL UNENCUMB. X SUB DESCRIPTIDN BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXE ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE MGT PUBLIC SAFETY 4 PUBLIC SAFETY 10 PERSONNEL BENEFITS 10 01 SALARIES-F1JLL TINE 5994 8697.95 14S 41000 44705.52 107 .00 71006 27020.49 62 02 SALARIES -OVERTIME B3 .00 0 581 1033.71 179 .00 1000 33.71- 103 10 4* PERSONNEL DENEFITS 6667 8697.95 143 42469 45019.23 100 .00 72806 26986.77 63 11 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS - 11 10 FRINOE BENEFITS 509 2924.29 497 4123 8716.04 211 .00 7073 1643.04--123 .- 15 RETIREMENT CDNTRIBUTION 1334 1102.16 132 5831) 6237.75 107 .00 10009 3771.25 62 17 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE _ 35 .00 0 245 221,33 90 .00 420 198.67 '5'3 _ 20 INS PREM-LTD 344 212.46 71 2400 1112.31 46 .00 4131 3010.69 27 11 R',4- EPIPLOYEE rirwr 1002 1260.91 237 12614 162W.43 129 .00 21633 5345.57 75 21 SUPPLIES , 21 10 OFEICE SUPPLIES/POSTAGE 250 174.42 70 1.750 1506.33 136 .00 3000 1493.67 50 35 UNIFORMS 6 SAFETY EGUIP. 63 .00 0 441 129.90 30 .00 750 620.02 17 70 AUTOMOTIVE DAS/DIFSEL 63 so .81 81 441 119,77 27 .00 750 &36.23 16 21 *), SUPPLIES 376 1.25.23 60 2632 176.019 67 .00 4500 2713.92 39 30 PROFESSIDNAL/TECHNICAL 30 90 PROF -OTHER 2500 .00 0 17556 16505.07 94 .00 30100 13594.93 55 91 VEHICLE ABATEMENT 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 96 WEED ABATEMENT 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 6 30 JE* PROFESSIONAT/lECHNICAL 2506 ,00 0 17556 16505.01 94 .00 301 00 13594.93 155 33 REPAIR !, MAINTENANCE 33 30 R/M-EGUIPMENI 25 .00 0 175 .00 0 .00 300 300.00 0 50 R & 0 - MOTOR VEHICLES 299 .00 0 2093 367.77 19 .00 3591 3203.23 1/ 33 ff,, REPAIR !, MAINIPP/ANCF 324 .00 0 2268 307.7; 17 .00 3891 3503.23 10 -- 34 VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT 31 05 CON1RACT SERVICES 16 .06 o 112 .00 0 .00 190 190.00 0 31 *91 1 PUBLIC SAFETY 11093 13192.09 119 77651 00755050 104 .00 133120 52364.42 61 30 *ff WA- PUBLIC 943:.Erf 11093 1.31:22.09 119 77651. 80755.50 104 .00 133120 52364.42 61 IV 3210 TOTAL *N.4**-4,4 FIRE PREVENTION 11093 13192.09 119 77651 00755.59 1.04 .00 133120 52364.42 61 ERT 32 TOTAL .4*4**** FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY 7134/ 13616.29 19 499429 317002.99 64 .00 056153 538350.01 37 :00RAM: G11267, 58% OF YEAR-.!-AFSED 11Y ni San . nt0 rmuc. ACCOUNTING FERID'-',.7/1996 1ND 010 GENERAL FUND DEPT/DIV 3300 COMM. DEVLP.-BUILDING/ somoimio****YEAR-TO-DATE*)6i44m* ANNUAL UNLNLumi. X JB• SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL NEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BDGT 30 PUBLIC SAFETY' 31 PUBLIC SAFETY id ,PERS'ONNEL BENEFITS 10 01 SALARIES -FULL TIME 02 SALARIES -OVERTIME 10 PPRSCINNEL„ DENEFrit 11 11 10 15 20 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FRINGE BENEFITS RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION INS PREM-LUD c4,LOyEt bENEtil-iJ 21 SUPPLIES 21 10. OFFICE surPLIEb/001Mt 15 BOOKS 35 UNIFORMS & SAFETY EGUIP. 70 AUTOMOTIVE: 21 *Hi SUPPLIES 30 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL 30 90 PROF -OTHER 1 2 3 4 3014 4895.39 162 21098 20533.45 97 .00 361613 15634.55 57 42 .00 0 294 .00 0 .00 500 500.00 0 3056 4895.39 160 21392 20533.45 96 .00 36660 16134.55 56 502 9117.13 197 3514 3609.36 105 .00 6022 2332.64 61 390 538.83 138 2730 2604.34 95 .00 4674 2069.66 56 66 82.66 125 462 371.97 01 .00 791 419.03 47 inR 1600.62 16B 6706 6665.67 99 .00 11407 4021.33-- - 5S 200 1.3 .29 67 1456 671.25 46 .00 2500 1028.75-27- 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 50 .00 0 350 224.34 64 .00 600 375.66 37 01. 07.11 10 581 680.30 119 .00 1000 311.70 b9 341 225.46 66 2307 1503.09 66 .00 4100 2516.11 39 120B .00 0 0456 3771.70 45 .00 1.4500 10728.22 26 31 TRAVEL & MEETING COSTS 31 20 CONF/SEMINARS/WORKSHOPS 42 85.00 202 294 95.00 29 .00 500 415.00 17 33 REPAIR e. MAINTENANCE 33 30 R/M-EOUIPMENT 42 43.05 103 294 392.60 134 .00 500 107.40 79 po R II M - MOTOR VEHICLES 63 .00 0 441 143.09 32 .00 ' 750 606.91 19 tii ** i--&i, i, H(i1i4TEivi4iU ibt 41 :6:75 4i 535.69 73 .00 'no 714;31---A7 ------ 36 OTHER SERVICES 6, .CHARGES U 25 Aii0-Ek'ff&di4(3 83 .00 0 •581 095.96 154 .00 1000 iO4.04 31 nn ifif PUBLIC SAFETY 5793 6057.52 11S 40551 34071.44 84 .00 69505 35433.56 r30 4.* ..c PUBLIC SAFETY . 5793 6057.57 110 405151 34071.44 F4 .00 69505 35433.56 HO' -Ntoii TOTAL 4444444 COMMUNITY SERVICES 5793 6057.52 119 40551 34071.44 04 .00 69505 35433.56 49 io:oi 33 TOTAL i4-ii4'k).6 COMM. DEVLE.-DUILDING 5793 6057.52 11B 40551 34071.44 134 .00 69505 35433.56 49 49 49 . „.... . )c.wArn GM267L 441 Sall Jac:1 ill I) CHOL. 546,41 OF YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 11' 010 GENERAL FUND DEPT/DIV 1100 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRAIN/ ELE 09J ACCOUNT 444.9.4******CORRENT44********* ***4.9******YEAR-TO-DATE-x*****44 ANNUAL UNENCUMB. X S98 DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP FNCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BDGT GENERAL GOVERNMENT 10 0k80i,ii#,L. btN&fit 10 01 SALARIES -FULL TIME 7899 9807.55 112 55293 36304.52 66 .00 9479:L 59486.48 38 02 SALARIES-0VERTIME 125 322.95 258 875 ' 739.41 85 .00 1500 760.59 49 03 SALARIES -PART TIME 0 .00 0 0 652.50 0 .00 0 652.50- 0 10 *4 PERS1:)NNEL. DENEFI15 11024 9130.50 114 56161.1 37696.43 67 .00 96291 58594.57 39 11 EMPLOYEE DENEEITS 11 10 FRIN3E: BENEFITS 096 1104.98 132 6272 4179.62 71 .00 10757 15 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION 1028 949.40 92 7196 4576.50 64 .00 12336 20 INS PREN-LID 79 100.09 129 553 444.85 00 .00 951 11 4414 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 2003 2235.27 112 14021 9500.97 60 .00 24044 6277.39 42 7759.50 37 506.15 47 11543.03 40 21 SUPPLIES 21 10 OFFICE SUPPLIES/POSTAGE 42 134.40 320 294 609.10 207 .00 500 108.40- 122 35 UNIFORM .SAFETY EGUIPMNT 42 .00 0 294 224.38 76 .00 500 275.62 45 70 SUPPLY-AUTOMOTIVE/GAS F,Is 194,55 234 501 573.99 99 .00 1000 426.01 57 00 SMALL TOOIS/EOUIPMENT B .00 0 56 .00 0 .00 100 100.00 0 21 VuTI SUPPLIES .175 779.95 199 1225 1406.77 115 .00 2100 693.23 67 30 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL 30 90 PROF -OTHER 57- .00 0 399- 20-77.50 521- .00 693- 2760.50- 304- • --- 33 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 33 30 R/M-EGUIPMENT 42 .00 0 294 17.31 6 .00 500 402.69 4 50 R/M-MOTOR VEHICLES 205 .00 0 1435 29.53 2 .00 2459 2428.47 i • 33 ‘' REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 247 .00 0 1729 46.04 3 .00 2958 291.1.16 2 34 CONIRACT/LEASES/REN1 34 W:; CONTRACT SERVICES 57 .00 0 399 704.20 71 .00 603 390.00 42 35 UTILITY SERVICE 35 16 IELFFHONF 110 09.69 91 770 352.97 46 .00 1320 967.03 27 17 CELLULAR TELEPHONE 40 .00 0 290 .00 0 .00 480 480.00 0 35 /4n UTILITY SERVICE 150 99.69 67 1050 352.97 ,4 .00 1000 1447.03 26 ---,------- O *4 *4 10599 11791.11 111 74.L93 51345.611 69 .00 .1.27193 75027.32 40 O w* oi* GENERAL UOVERNMENT 10599 11794.41 111 741.93 51365.68 69 .00 127193 75827.32 40 ✓ 4 00 TD1A1- 44444414,.4 ENGINEERING A1.IM1N 10599 11794.41 111 741.93 51365.60 69 .00 127193 75027.32 40 ROUKAM1 9M26:1-1- Itv of San ; nto luit.... I( 50% OF YEAR- --ApsED ., -• , ACCOUNTING PERIC "7/1996 .---. OND 010 GENERAL FUND A tit bTO UB SUB DESCRIPTION to to lo 10 10 11 11 11 01 02 03 10 15 to GENERAL GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL BENEFITS SALARIES -FULL TIME SALARIES -OVERTIME SALARIES -PART tiHL PERSONNEL BENEFITS EMPLOYEE i4EFI1-8 FRINOE BENEFITS RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION LH-LTEI EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DEPT/DIV 4150 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATN/STREET MAINTENANCE Wil-or*Wiiii**49rAR-TO-DATEANNUAL UNEWOHS. BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL P1EXP ENCUMDR, BUDGET BALANCE 21 SUPPLIES 21 10 OFFICE SUPPLIES/POSTAGE 35 UNIFORM & SAFETY EOUIPMNT 70 SUPPLY-A1JT0M1JTIVE/9A5 90 SMALL FOOLS/EOUIPMENT 21 i14 SUPPLIES 30 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL 30 90 PROF -OTHER 10069 13526.71 292 402.50 607 777.00 11760 11706.21 1238 1371 701 3310 125 76083 62852.34 83 .00 130130 138 2044 2061.13 101 .00 ;3500 120 4249 12019.00 783 .00 7280 125 92376 76932.47 93 .00 141210 2304.26 196 1704.82 124 114 4809.64 145 8666 10045.77 125 .00 14854 9597 9215.43 96 .00 16446 4907 7609.60 74 .00 0410 23170 22670.90 90 .00 39710 67 .00 0 469 413.19 oa .00 800 167 .00 0 1169 2005.54 178 .00 2000 El7 255.41 49 :;619 4989.80 138 .00 6700 167 .00 0 1169 .00 0 .00 2000 918 255.41 213 6126 7409.53 117 .00 11000 1688 .00 0 11816 12520.00 106 .00 20250 33 REPAIRS 6 MAINTENANCE 33 10 KM -BUILDINGS ' 83 86 iiih-OUIpHLN/ -5002 50 R/M-MOTOR VEHICLES 4000 33 3434 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 9005 _ . 34 CONMACT/LFASES/RENTS 34 05 CONTRACT SERVICES 35 315 UTILITY SERVICE 10 UTILITIES -WATER 12 OTILITIEG-0A8 14 UTILITIES-EDISON 16 TELEPHONE *34 UTILITY SERVICE .00 0 581 678.04 117 .00 1000 434.30 9 , 35014 4100.23 12 .00 60018 .00 0 28000 18070.34 65 .00 48000 134.30 5 63595 22928.61 36 .00 109018 6292 00.00 1 44044 15750.11 101 .00 75500 33 41.52 126 231 335.79 145 .00 400 11 .00 0 1:L9 9.1)5 9 .00 200 283 33.49 12 1901 3/63.10 .1.90 .00 3100 125 26.71 21 875 944.91 108 .00 1.500 101.72 2;3 - - 3206 5053.65 159 .00 5300 40 CAPITAL OUTLAYS 40 15 CAP -MACHINERY & FOU1FMENT 9093 110 A44 RN- 41602 110 4C4 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 41602 )IV 4150 TOTAL '4.1x/1)4-444 STREEI MAINTENANCE 41602 .66 207.3137:110 20307.20 x BDGT 67577.66 48 1438.87 59 4739.00= is -- 6127/.53 55 4008.23 73 8230.57 50 4000:40----43 17039.20 57 386.81 52 85.54- 104 1210.70 Si 2000.00 0 3511.47 60 7730.00 62 321.96 68 55837.77 --r 29929.66 38 96009.39 21. 29749.06 61 64.21 190.15 363.10- 555.09 446.35 84 5 111 63 0 56591 69127.35 120 .00 97000 20072.65 76 49 291214 261471.55 90 .00 499100 237716.15 52 49 291214 261171.55 90 .00 499109 237716.45 52 20307.20 49 291214 261171.55 90 .00 4991013 237716.45 52 DURAN; 0M267L 38% OF YEAR LAPSED ty of San Jacinto —.— ND 010 UENERAL FUND DEPT/DIV 4150 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATN/STREET MAINTENANCE ELE OBJ ACCOUNT *********CURRENT********** **********YEAR—TO—DATE******* ANNUAL UNENCUMB, B SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMDR. BUDGET BALANCE ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 PT 41 TOTAL 4444N4i)04* PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATN 52201 32101.69 62 365407 312037.23 86 .00 626381 313543.77 50 _•• • tU(JF:AII I 0M26 / I - r - u'f S e » 58% OF YEAR L„ (PSEG ACCOUNTING PERIOD ...07/1996 JIJD 010 GENERAL FUND i E`LF: bo41 --- _ ACCOUNT JD SUB DESCRIPTION 20 25 COMMUNITY SERVICES GENERAL SERVICES 33 FtE: F'AIE: NAINT€WW.. . 33 10 R/M-BUILDINGS 30 R/ M-OFFICE EQUIF'11ENT 3:$ i. F<F:I='A 1. �'\ 1, PIAINI'12:NAN(JL 34 RENTAL & CONTRACT SERVICE 34 OS CONTRACT SERVICES 35 UTILITY SERVICE 35 :I0 UTILITIES -WATER 12 UTILIIIES-GAS 14 UTIL.ITIES-EDISON 16 1EL.LFH0NF 35 x* UTILITY SERVICE 25 * UI.:]dl:NAL !31::f VTC:ES 20 :e;. au COMMUNIT 7 ',LERVIL Ei:S IV 6100 TOTAL ******* MUSEUM 51'1 61 TU(AL_ MUSEUM DEFT/DIV 61.00 MUSEUM/ *w*wCURRENT********** ******ir *YEAR...TO.._DATE*i.k**i... ANNUAL - ONENCE7MB. BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL NEXT* ENCUMAR. BUDGET BALANCE BDGT • .00 0 945 025.00 07 .00 1625 000.00 51 .00 0 29 .00 0 .00 50 50.00 0 .00 0 973 075.00 C-1.5 .00 1675 050.00 49 458 .00 3206 4325,00 135 .00 5500 1175.00 79 _. 19 64•OS 337 133 310.60 734.00 230 80.60= 135 40 .00 0 20056. 0 720 .00 405 429.93 12 40 .00 0 200 353.91 126 .00 485 131.09 73 21 35.62 170 147 230.33 157 .00 250 "19I67-"-92- 120 99.67 93 040 950.91. 1:13 .00 1450 499.09 66 f c t 6100.9177 25 2524.09._ 71 �?,s� 14 ...r,l>s I_�. .00 ET6:..:, e_..-.. 717 99,67 14 5019 6100.91. 122 .00 8625 2524.09 71 717 99.67 14 5019 6100.91 1.22 .00 0625 2524.09 71 717 99.67 14 5019 6100.91 1.22 .00 13625 2524.09 71 TONAM: 0M2671. Ty ol San JacinTo 595 or YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 AD 010 GENERAL FUND DEPT/DIV 7400 COMMUNITY CENTER/ ELE ODJ ACCOUNT *****00**CURRENT********** 0*********yE.Ak-To-DATE*0*i.o6(* ANNUAL UNE:NEUW. -g SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL 14EXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BDGT 0 COMMUNITY SERVICES 5 GENERAL SERVICES 10 PERSONNEL BENEFITS 10 03 SALARIES -PART TIME 644 736.06 114 4500 3703.1R 02 .00 7725 4021.02 46 11 ENPLOYEE BENEFITS . 11 10 FRINGE BENEFITS 03 50.50 71 561 690.46 HY .00 997 306.54 69 20 INS PREM - LTD 0 1.10 0 0 2.46 0 .00 0 2.46- 0 11 *0 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 039,76 72 501 692.92 119 .00 997 3-(54.csa 70 „., 21 , SUPPLIE5 21 10 OFFICE WWII:ES 125 93 .3-7 75 075 '792 • 25 91 .00 1506 707.75 73 33 REFAiR & MAINTENANCE 33 10 R/M-BUILDING0 167 406.06 243 1169 002,71 76 .00 2000 11I7.2 A4 34 RENTAL & CONTRACT SERVICE 34 OS CONTRACT BERVICES 700 66.06 11 4956 5059.03 A02 .00 e51)0 3440.17 60 UTILITY SERVICE 35 10 UTILITIES -WATER 30 57.26 146 266 196.97 75 .00 450 251.03 44 12 UTILITIES -GAS 117 .00 0 019 402.44 59 .00 1400 917.56 35 14 UTILITIE0-ET:1160N 679 .00 0 4753 6303,90 :1.33 .00 9150 1E146.10 77 16 TELEFIANTE 167 31.67 1.9 1169 060.19 74 .00 2000 1131.023UWK UTILITY SERVICE 1001 n6.95 9 7007 7053.49 IA2 .00 12000 4116.51 65 GENERAL SERVICES 2726 1462.20 54 1.9096 10964.30 99 .00 32722 13737.62 la ..) ?0 0* 046 COMMUNITY SERVICES 2729 1462.20 54 19096 10964.70 99 .00 32722 13737.62 56 :V 7400 TOTAL COMMUNIIY CENTER 2720 1462.20 54 19096 10904.30 99 .00 32722 13737.62 50 _ . FT 74 TOTAL $34)4**N* COMMUNITY CENTER 2720 1462.20 54 1.9096 10964.30 99 .00 32722 13737.62 59 ;DORAN: 0M2671 •ty of $al) . oto 513Y. OF YEAR F„AFSED ACCOUNTING PERIOD-07/1996 IND 010 UENERAL FUND DEPT/DIV 0400 SWIMMING FOOL/ ELE OBJ Accbarr ***44:4****CORRrNT*** *********4YEAR-TO-DAUE4*:** - AFINIJAC UNENCUMB. 18 SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXF BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE •SDOT 20 COMMUNITY SERVICES 25 GENERAL SERVICES 34 RENTAL & CONTRACT grRVICE 34 05 CONTRACT SERVICES 25 4-84 )4* GLNLRAL UCEVICE5 20 4-x, I** COMMUNITY SERVICES IV 8400 TOTAL Niii1it*U44 SWIMMING POOL 81 TOTAL W4411-1444",i SWIMMTNG rom LIND 010 TOTAL ii/4**444k4 GENERAL FUND 1209 .00 0 9456 4033.31 57 .00 14500 9666.66 33 MO .00 0 8456 4877.74 57 1200 .00 0 0156 4033.34 57 .00 11500 9666.66 33 1209 .00 0 9456 4033.74 57 1208 .00 0 8456 4833.31 57 427021 429677.77 .100 2994747 2602920.79 90 .00 14500 9666.66-33 .00 14500 9666.66 33 .00 11500 9666.68 33 .00 5133706 2450057.21 °GRAM: 0M267I 50% or YEAR LArnED Ay of Ban Jacinto ND 011 TITLE IIIB GRANT DEPT/DIV 7400 COMMUNITY CENTER/ ELE O1IJ ACCOUNT, * ******CURRENT*********m **********YEAR-TO-DATE******* ANICAL SUB DESCRIPTION q BUDGET ACTUAL XEXF' BUDGET ACTUAL %EXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 '0 COMMUNITY SERVICES GENERAL SERVICES 10 PERSONNEL BENEFITS 10 03 SALARIES -PART TIME i.,EUEttfU 11 10 FRINGE BENEFIE.1 20 INS PREM - LTD 11 i(i* EFTPLOYEE BENEFITS 21 SUPPLIES 21 10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 31 TRAVEL. MEETING COSTS 31 ITJ MILEAOE REIMBURSEMENT 33 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 33 30 Rill -OFFICE EUDIFTIENT 44 44 GENERAL SERVICES !O *4 *4 COMMUNITY SERVICES .0 .Moo TOTAL 'KX CENTER :PT 74 TOTAL 444444* COMMUNITY CENTER IWIT OTT iciTAL TITLE IIID GRANT 477 - 693.94 146 3339 3440.32 103 ,00 5720 2279.68 41 55.22135 207 272.2 95 .00 406 213.70 56 0 1.11 V 0 2.29 0 .00 0 2.29- 0 41 56.33 137 287 274.51 96 .00 486 211.44 -.5-7- 19 00 0 133 17.67 13 .00 223 non.13 G 26 .00 0 182 100.62 55 .00 306 23 .00 0 161 .00 0 .00 2 7 I 50e. 70.27 120 4102 3033.12 93 .00 7006 3172.80 586 750.27 120 4102 3033.12 93 .00 7006 3172.80 586 750.27 128 4102 3033.12 93 .00 7006 3172.00 55 586 750,27 120 4102 3033.12 93 .00 7006 3172.88 55 586 750.27 120 4102 3033,12 93 .00 7006 3172.00 55 14 'MORAN: 8M262.1.. 511% OF YEAR ,,,APSED ity of San : nlo, 1ND 018 WOPKMANS COMPENSATION DEFT/DIV 2250 PERSONNEL/PERSONNEL A ELE OD4 ACCOUNT *********CURP-ENT********** m********iiman:,Tn—nAlr*I** ANNUAL-- ONFNCOMB. X UB , SUB DESCRIPTION -BUDGET ACTUAL XEXF BUD8ET ACTUAL %TAP ENCUMDR. BUDGET BALANCE BUST . . ACCOUNTING PERIO47/1996 10 GENERAL GOVERNMENT , 1.9 WORKMAN COMPENSATION 25 14;drt8SidWiLitLCHNITAL 30 90 PROFESSIONAL 6 SPEC SVCS 459 .00 0 3206 1499.70 47 .00 5500 4001.30. '27 31 1i4SlikiaNGE 6 bAMAGL LOSTS 37 05 INSURANCE & LIONIII, 11971 .00 0 03797 1077139.00 129 3652 35913.00 75 19 +tg N-ii WORKMAN COMPENSATION 12429 .00 0 M7003 109237.70 126 : 14 149157 39914;30 73 -- 10 ** ** GENERAL GOVERNMENT 1.2429 .00 o 07003 109237:70 126 .00 149152 39914.30 73 _ IV 22.50 TOTAL )43411W-NN PERSONNEL 12429 .00 0 A7003 109237.70 126 .00 149152 39914.30 73 EPT 22 TOTAL iffiii-Kii44* PERSONNEL 12129 .00 0 97003 109237.70 126 .00 149152 39914.30 73 UND 019 TOTAL ********* WORNMANS COMPENSATION 12429, .00 0 87003 109237.70 126 .00 149152 39914.30 73 )0RAM; St1267L ty ot Si Jacinto '581: OF YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTINO PERIOD 07/1996 4D 019 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DEPT/DIV 3100 PUBLIC SAFETY/ ELE OBJ ACCOUNT 4********CURRENT*n******** **********YEAR—TO—DATEA****** ANNUAL UPERUN96. X D SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL )(MCP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE O PUBLIC SAFETY 1 pUBLICSAFET"( 2i SUPPLXES 21 70 AUTOMOTIVE GAS/DIESEL 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 1 *K *W PUBLIC 'JAFETY 0 .00 0 0 O 444 *H PUBLIC SAFETY 0 .00 0 0 ✓ 3100 10TAL wm**** rouce DEPARTMENT 0 .00 0 0 .00 PT 31 TOTAL /4141444n4w PUBLIC SAFETY 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 ) .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 .00 0 ' 0GRAM 7 LiM`.r'4 itY of San 56% OF YE t AF'SED Jiff, 019 EPUIF'MENT REPLACEMENT DEPT/L'IV 3200 FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY/ A ELE iHJ ActODRY MMMMMMMMM URF'F_NTMMMMMMMMMM **********YEAR—TO.r1TE*+t**w*w UB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL_ %EXF'_ BUDGET ACTUAL. XEXF' ENCUMHF. BUDGET BALANCE HLII3T ACCOUNTING F'F.RI Or' "^,7/ 1996 30 PUBLIC SAFETY 3.1. PUBLIC SAFETY 21 SLTFPLLE$ _. _... 21 70 AUTOMOTIVE (3AS3/DIESEL. 0 .00 0 0 31 mk uaa F'�JI31. iS` SAF LFY 0 .00 0 0 30 M* M4 PUBLIC SAFE:T'( 0 .00 0 0 1V 3200 TOTAL MMMiiMMM FIRE .00 0 0 .00 ANNUAL __..UNENCR1W .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00- 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 0 .00 .00 0 .00 O .00 a °GRAM: OM267L tr of Ban Jacinto 53X OF YEAR tAPSED ACCOUNTIND PERIOD 07/1996 ND 019 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DEPT/DIV Z210 FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY/FIRE FREVENTION FLE OBJ ACCOUNT *********CURRENT*******4;4* *********)4YEAR—TO—DATE******* ANNUAL UNENCUMB. B SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET _ ACTUAL-- _ XEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE bpor O PUBLIC SAFETY 1 pUDLICSAFETY 21 SUPPLIES 21 70 AUTOMOTIVE OAS/BIESEL 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 i 4t)t i PUBLIC SAFETY 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 O ** 44- PUBLIC SAFET‘r 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 ✓ 3210 TOTAL *i“iN)444-M FIRE PREVENTION 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 :00_ PT 32 TOTAL iiNV#44** FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 �Ui3FiAM : 0MG16 /L... t y .P .r' ''itu 56% OF YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING 1 ERIOD,.(37/1996 ND 019 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DEFT/DIV 3300 COMM. DEVLP.-._BUILDIN0/ LL.E. OliJ _.. -' ACt:OUHT 44***Ni*iiRr CTRFENT>trig4** Frf+r 4F.14 WR WYEAR—TO.:..DAICA**#+e. ai JD SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP 'BUDGET ACTUAL /.E:XP ANNUAL UNENCUME: ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BOOT 30 PUBLIC SAFETY 31 PUBLIC SAFETY 21 UPF°LIE."s 21. 70 AUTOMOTIVE GAS/DIESEL 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 31 44 4* PUBLIC SAFETY 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 .00 30 44 x* PUBLIC SAFET'i 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 IV 3300 TOTAL **>r0*** COMMLJNI'T'Y SERVICES 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 'EFT 33 TOTAL *ikiik NNK COMM. DEVLP.--DUILDIN0 ,._- 0 ,00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 DURAN: 0M2671_ ty of Gan Jacinto ------- 5GY OF YEAR LarsEu ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 IV 019 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DEPT/DIV 1i00 PUBLIC WORKS ADHINISTRATN/ ELE OKI ' ACCOUNT 4**iiA****CURGENT********** ***ii******YEAR-TO-DATE*m*44;t* ANNUAL UNENCGHB. • SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BEIGT O GENERAL GOVERNMENT 0 21 SUPPLIES 21 70 SUPPLY-AUTLINOFIVE/GAS 0 O 41-4 V,4 GENERAL. GOVERNMERM ✓ 4100 TOTAL 4i4J1+fio** ENGINEERING ADNIN f-- O .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 o 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 o :00 0 O .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 O .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 5 .-- PROBRAN: 011267L Ciiv of tRin Jaclitio vAbE 5ex OF YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 FUND 025 LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND DEPT/DIV 7252 LIND/ZONE A-3 AMERICAN VILLAGE BA EL E OBJ ACCOUNT ****14****CURRENT********** SUB BUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMER. BUDGET BALANCE DWI- , ------- 410 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 410 30 PROFESSIONAL/lECHNITML- 30 90 PROF -OTHER 970 .00 0 6790 352:3.00 .00 11630 0115.00 30 33 REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE: 33 30 R/M-EOUIPMENT 833 .00 0 5831 550.3,47 94 .00 10000 34 CONTRACT/LEASES/RENTS ) on CONTRACT SERVICES 5417 .00 0 37919 30027.91 8.1 20533.70 65000 .35 UTILITY SERVICE 35 10 UTILITIES -WATER 1333 159.25 12 9331 11719.10 126 .00 1.6000 14 UTILITIES-EDISON 333 .00 0 2331 1700.13 73 .00 4000 16 TELEPHONE 42 57.21 136 294 1106.76 404 .00 500 33 H* UTILITY SERVICE 1708 216.46 13 11956 14605.99 122 .00 20500 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 :10 INTER -FUND TRANSFERS OUT 1440 3103.10 216 10000 10076-30 .1.011 .00 17274 416 o4 m..* 10368 3319.56 32 72576 65336.67 90 20533.70 124412 .410 **I i4* GENERAL GOVERNMENT . . 10360 7319.56 32, 72576 65336.67 90 20533.70 124412 DIV 7252 TOTAL 1 ZONE A-3 AMERICAN VILLAGE 10360 3319.56 32 72576 65336.67 90 20533.70 124412 30541.63 76 4496.53 55 5638.39 91 4200.90 73 2299.07 43 686- 231 5894.01 71 6397.70 63 30541.63 76 30541..63 76 PROORAM1 0M2671 Citv of Sall IO w% or TEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 FUND 025 LIGH!17.o MAINTENANCE rum) DEFT/Div 7251 LLMD/ZONE .A..-BERITAGE RANCH fiA ELE ULU AMOUNT. 40‘44440****cum&NT.**Amm* **K11Viiii44WITTEAR-TO-'DATEIT41.0T* ANNUAE UNENC SUB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXF BUDGET ACTUAL 14EXFENCUMDR, BUDGET BALANCE TOOT 410 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 410 36- PNWENSIORAL7TEMANTUAt 30 90 PRO -OTHER 33 HAINtkAAWitP 33 30 R/M-FOUIPMENT 34 UONTkAct/LEAgEs/RENTS 34 05 CONTRACT SERVICES 35 UTILITY SERVICE 35 10 UTILITIES -WATER 14 UTILITIES-EDISON 35 44(StIL4Ti' SERVICE.- - 0 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 7.S0 i6 iUTEk-4-00b TRUCiPETZT; OUT 1 ** 410 *X WH GENERAL. GOVERNMENT 7 1DIV 7251 TOTAL 4444N-M0,4 ZONE A-2 HERITAGE RANCH 104 .00 0 1200 1414.13 11.0 .00 2209 794.07 64 100 .00 0 700 .00 0 .00 1200 1200.00 1042 .00 0 7294 3251.91 45 5345.59 12500 3902.50 69• 033 1000.30 131 5031 6906.05 120 .00 10000 3013.15 70 42 .00 0 294 293.34 100 .00 500 206.66 59 10011:30 124 6175 7200.19 :1.19 .00 10500 3219TRY -69 156 - 761.27 218 2497 2600.90 100 .00 427:1 1502:10 163 2557 1055.65 73 17899 14635.13 02 5345.59 30600 10699.28 65 2557 1855.65 73 17099 14635.13 132 5345.59 30680 10699.28 65 2557 1015.65 73 17099 14635.13 312 5345.19 30600 10699.20 65 d,,UL,UL-1 1..ALJO.1 PROORAM: SM2671_ 50X OF YEAR LAPSED Cltv of E)all Jacinto • _ :FUND 0.25 LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND DEPT/DIV 7250 LLMD/SAN JACINTO WEST IBA EL E OBJ - ACCOUNT M.14%***ttioNCURRENT***** **********YEAR-TO-DATF******* ANNUAL SUB BUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBR, BUDGET BALANC 0A0E io AGcni.iNTTNo FERMI, 07/1996 410 GENERAL UOVERNMENT 1410 30 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL stoT 30 90 PROF -OTHER 999 .00 0 6993 4562.00 65 .00 119e0 7426.00 a 1 33 i;t:riks N MAINTEi,iANCE , 33 30 R/M-FOUIRMEN1 417 .00 0 2919 905.40 34 .00 5000 1014.60 20 34 CONTRACT/LEASES/RENTS00 CONTRACT SERVICES 5375 .00 0 37625 20042.07 21400.60 64500 22169,25 66 35 WAJLI'1i' SERVIOL 35 10 UTILITIES -WATER 2050 1900.42 67 19950 25747.13 129 .00 34200 0452.07 75 14 UTILITIES-EDISON 517 .00 0 3619 1740.47 40 .00 6200 4459.53 28 3b *4 UTILITY SERVICE 3367 1.906:4 57 2569 27407.60 117 .00 40400 i ,1712 : 4-6 -611 A 50 10 INTER -FUND TRANSFERS 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 664 i641 .:50.66 f,!i<i., 11407 12401.0i 100 .00 19697 7,.9.:95 :19--- ---,VS- -- -- - - 410 ** 4ix 11799 5446.30 46 82593 66270.00 0 1 21400.60 14505 531317.44 410 itit .A.t GENERAL GOVERNMENT 11799 5446.30 46 82593 66278.88 E30 214011.60 141585 53017.44 62 l'AIV 7250 TOTAL itnnnttn* SAN JACINTO WEST 11799 5446.30 46 62593 66270400 RO 21400.6R 141505 53817.44 62 PROGRAM: OM2671 50X OF YEAR Citv ol San J Au FUND 025 LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND DEPT/DIV 7100 LIGHTING LANDSCAPE PARKS/ BA ELE OBJ ACCOUNT :44****4**NCURNENT***N*0**** **********yEAN—ro-nAmg*****i* ANNUAL SUB SUB BEBDRIPTIDN BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE OBOT ACCOUNTING PERIOD -7/1996 INEPT 71 TOTAL VINN*M404 LIGHTING LANDSCAPE PARKS 11654 7621.74 65 01570 60050.46 04 .00 139055 70996.54 49 PROURAM: 6M2671 City uf S ii Jai.:iniu 513% or YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING rERIon 07/1996 FUND 025 LIONTIN0 MAINTENANCE FUND DEPT/DIV 4100 LIOHTING LANDSCAPE PARKS/ BA ELE OBJ ACCOUNT *********CURRENTio.m****%** **********YEAR-TO-DATF,poix*xs* ARNOWL UNENCUHP. _ SI1E1 SUB DESCRIPTION • BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE P8GT 110 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 410 10 PERSONNEL BENEFITS 10 01 SALARIES -FULL TIME 3070 2740.00 90 21490 13419.40 62 .00 36842 23422.60 36 02 SALARIES -OVERTIME 42 80.16 191 294 346.30 110 .00 500 153.62 69 10 *ft PERSONNEL BENEFITS 3112 71170.16 91 21704 13765.70 61 .00 37342 n37,7-6:72- 37 11 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11 10 FRINGE BENEFITS 72' 930.90 130 5054 3721.09 74 .00 0667 49459 43 15 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION 406 363.67 90 2642 1758.70 62 .00 20 INsE0-1_1-p206 170.04 83 1442 771.98 54 .00 4871 36 3112.30 1705.02 31 11 444+ EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 133._-- 4 i47.61 1i6 93311 E;251.7e 67 .00 iZoit; 9763.23 29 21. SUPPLIES 21 10 OFFICE SUPPLIES/POSTAGE 8 .00 56 .00 0 .00 100 /00.00 0 35 UNIFORM & SAFETY EQUIPMNI 50 .00 0 350 .00 0 .00 600 600.00 0 70 5uPPLY7AuTomoyiy O .00 0 0 130.00 0 .00 0 130.08- 0 BO SMALL TOOLS/EQUIPMENT 150 .ao 6 i00 93.51 9 .00 1 boo 1706. .1.'-- 21 xx SUPPLIES 200 .00 0 1456 223.59 15 .00 2500 2276.11 9 i 30 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL 30 90 PROF -OTHER 958 .00 0 6706 3700.43 .00 11500 7799.57 32 1 33 REPAIRS 6 MAINTENANCE i 33 10 R/M-BUILDINSS 83 .00 0 501 .00 0 .00 1000 1000.00 0 30 R/M-EITUIpMENT 167 .00 0 1169 1200.99 110 .00 2000 719.01 64 50 R/M-MOTOR VEHICLES 559 62.79 15 3913 3575.02 91 .00 6712 33 4* REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 009 02.79 10 5663 4856.01 06 .00 9712 4855.19 50 ... _ . 34 CONTRACi/LEASES/RLUTS -4 05 CONTRACT SERVICES 1250 .00 0 0750 12925.09 1413 .00 15000 2074.91 86 50 VEN/EQUIP REPLACEMENT0_ .00 0 0 102.07 0 .00 0 102.02- 0 -34 '4* CONTRACT/LEASES/RENTS 1250 .00 0 0750 13107.11 150 .00 15006 /892.89 87 745 UTILITY SERVICE 35 16 UTI1JTIES-WATER :1.667 941 95e 11669 13257.90 114 14 UTILITIES-EDISON 633 .00 0 5831 5644.64 97 35 4.1.x. UTILITY SERVICE 2500 941.58. 38 17500 •10902.62 100 • 37 INSURANCE & DAMAGE COSTS 37 05 LIABILITY INSURANCE 417 .00 0 2919 .00 20000 .00 10000 .00 30000 .00 0 .00 5000 6742.02 66 4355.36 56 11097.38 63 5000.00 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 10 INTER -FUND TRANSFERS OUT_ 1066 '96,40 '15 7462 6050.35 ion .00 12786 4735.65 63 110 ** 34* 11654 7621.71 65 B1578 6E1050.46 01 .00 139e55 70996.54 49 410 Wit 5<")k GENERAL GOVERNMENT 1 1654 7621.74 65 61570 60050.46 04 .00 139855 70996.54 49 pTV 7100 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS PARKS 1/654 7621.74 65 91578 60050.16 334 .00 139855 70996.54 49 111b11:. PROURAM: GM2671 58% OF YEAP ' '1''GF.D ACCOUNTING PERIM' 7/1996 City of San , Ito - - . _ FUND 024 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND DEPT/DIV 4150 PUBLIC WORKS ADHINISTRATN/STREET MAINTENANCE ;BA ELE OEIJ ACCOUNT u********CURRENT********** AHNUAL UNE-WOMB. E 8U0 SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL. NEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BDO1 110 GENERAL UOVERNMENT 410 21. ;giirLfEt 21 35 UNIFORM 6 SAFETY EMIPMNT 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 80 SMALL 700LS/EOUIFMENT 0 .oa 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 21 ii. 6UPFLJES 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 00 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 10 INTER -FUND TRANSFERS OUT 1509- 1237.35 70 -11123 10677.21 96 .00 19064 6406.77 J6 1410 *x 14* 1589 1237.35 78 11123 10657.21 96 .00 19064 8406.79 56 .410 *t4 4('* GENERAL GOVERNMENT 1529 1237.35 76 11123 10657.21 96 .00 19064 0406.79 E36 ijW 4.150 TOTAL 4.14iiii-444i4;- 01.REET MAINTENANCE 1509 1237.35 78 11123 10657.21 96 .00 19064 0406.79 56 ii. TOTAL 44i)4 1-`UDL1C WORKS ADMINISTRATN 1509 1237.35 72 11123 10657.21 96 .00 19064 0406.79 56 iDEPT FUND 024 TOTAL TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 1509 1237.35 78 11123 10657.21 96 .00 19064 0406.79 ? 56 PROORAM: 01267L City of San Jacinto 50% OF YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 410 :** FUND 022 MEASURE A -' OAS TAX FUND DEPT/DIV 4150 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATN/STREET MAINTENANCE BA ELE OBJ ACCOUNT 44*****H**CURRENT******m**i* ****YEAR-TO-DATF******* ANNUAL UNENCUMB. . _ SUB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL Y.EXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE :PDOT 410 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 410 40 CAPITAL OUTLAYS 40 01 CAP-IMPROVEMENT/OTHER 62083 3007.00 n 4345S1 12071.73 3 642307.00 745000 90541.27 ea 50 iNTER km') ACTIVITY 50 1.0 INTER -FUND 1RANSFERS OUT 1446 14640.05-1013- 10122 10120.91 100 .00 L7350 7229.19 58 ** 63529 11641.85- 18- 444703 22192.54 5 642397.00 762350 97770.4A-- 87 . 41k ittt GENERAL. GOVERNMENT ,DIV 4150 TOTAL • STREET MAINTENANCE 1:1EPT 41 ,FUND 022 67529 11641.05- 10- 444703 22192.54 5 642307.00 762350 97770.46 87 63529 11641.05- 19- 444703 221.92.54 5 642307.00 762350 97770.46 137 'MAL 4...*44**3... PUDLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATN 63529 11641.957 10- 444703 22192.54 5 42397.00 762350 97770.46 87 TOTAL MEASURE A - GAS lAX FUND 63529 11641.05T 19-, 444703 22192.54 5 642307.00 /62350 97770.46 e7 „...., .., . PROGRAM: 9M26-,' 50X OF YEAP ' 'EGED ACCOUNTING FERIOP -7/1996 Cily of S:An .: Ao FUND 021 GAS TAX FUND DEPT/DIV 4150 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATN/STREET MAINTENANCE BA EU ON,: ACM.11.4 ****41*%**CURRENT)414****1***fm ****1.6***ft*VEAR-TO-DATrii4ii44.4* ANNUAL UNENC SUN SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMDR, BUDGET BALANCE PEIGT - , 410 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 410 33 NMAIKB t.-RAMENARM-- 33 30 R/M-EGUIPMENT 0 .00 0 o 267.73 0 .00 0 267.73- 0 34 WNIkMtiLLAt.W0-.44ENTS 34 05 CONTRACT SERVIGEB 0 .0G 0 0 .00 0 1040.00 1040 .00 100 40 CAPITAL OUTLA'i'S 40 01. CAP-IMPROVEMENT/OTHER 16049 .00 0 117943 72042.14 62 07197.45 202197 42157.41 79 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 00 lo 1NTER-EUN1: TRANSFERS GUT 40420 77450.00 102 292996 267676.50 93 .00 405176 221459.42 54 -416 -. ii* -7277 73450.00 12G 400939 336706.45 nA 09237.45 690373 263749.i:5 62 43,5444 4k4 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 572/7 77450.90 129 400939 336766.15 04 99237.45 609373 263319./0 62 InTv 4150 TOTAL N*14*ft** STREET MAINIENANEF 57277 77450.99 129 400939 336706.45 04 09237.45 609313 263349.10 62 DEFT 41 TOTAL Nif*N*MN 1 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATH 57277 73450.98 120 400939 336706.45 134 09237.15 609373 263349.10 62 HID 02A TOTAL GAS TAX FUND 57277 73450.09 120 400979 336706.45 134 B8237.45 699373 263749.10 62 PROURAM 011267L City- ut San Jacinto 5051 OF YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 FOND 020 LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND DEPT/DIV 2200 PERSONNEL/ IBA ELL ODJ ACCOUNT :c*****i.i**EURRNT*Ni******** **********YEAR-TO-DAIF**x*** ANNUAL LIFJEFICUHF.- X 'SUB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXF ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BDGT :1410 GENERAL 00VERNMENT 1419 WORKMAN COMPENSATION 0 3o PROFE9SIONAL/TECHNICAL I 30 90 PROFESSIONAL & SPEC SVC9 0333 0999.01 108 50331 33751.80 50 .00 100000 66248.20 34 37 05 INSURANCE 6 BONUS 96,4 .00 0 67640 115973.00 171 .00 115973 .00 100 419 *a ** WORKMAN COMPENSATION .17997 8999.01 50 125979 149724.00 119 .00 215973 66248.20 -6V 41 * ** GENERAL GOVERNMENT 17997 9999.01 50 125979 1451724.00 119 .00 215973 66240.20 69 1.- IDIV 2200 TOTAL **44N-4** PER6ONNEL. 17997 8999.01 50 125979 149724.00 119 .00 215973 66240.20 69 DEPT 22 TOTAL ******* PERSONNEL. 179971, 0999.01 50 125979 149724.00 119 .00 215973 66248.20 69 FUND 020 TOTAL likNi+NW,304N LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND 17997 0999.01 50 125979 149724.00 119 .00 215973 66240.20 69 :1 PRUGRAM' GM26 P` 513Y. OF YEAR�rFo city of Sail ` o\o ' /"". a AccouwTzwo psnzon nr/�9p6 � puwu 01.9 suuzpwsu/ xLpLAcswcwr ospr/ozw 9000 WATER/ [� .�� �d�-- J'---- ACUObNT~ To- ranvuAL orEMcMB° � h nue SUB usocmzpTzom zmoasT poTum. XsXP euoesT wuruAL xsxp swcuxon^ auoosr a*Lnwus aogr 450 LN7snPRzSE �� ' -�h -RUpP-L1tQ 2/ 70 guppL/-vuronorzos/o�)n '4�,;o �a ** v* sw7ERF:IRzS� ozv p000 To/*L ******* . wArs* c^pzrAL zwpnovEmEHT |ucpr vo lur^I- ***x*** WAIVR F019 TOTAL *w***w*** EQUIPMENY REPLACEMENT / | � - o ,on o o .ou u ^Oo n ^uo n 0 100 o o .00 o ,00 o ,nn o » ^oo o o .nu o °nm o ^no o � o .on o o ^oo V ^Oo n ^oo h o ,00 m o .00 o .no u ^ou u _ u ,on o o .ov o .wo 0 ^oo n � � PROGRAM UM267L 51-1N OFT YEAR LAPSED ACCUUNIJNG FERIOD 07/1996 Cliy of San JaLinto FUND 019 EGUIPMEN1 REPLACEMENT DEPT/DIV 7100 LIGHTING LANDSCAPE PARKS/ ;DA ELE OBJ ACCOUNT 44********CURRENT********** **0**1*****YEAR—TO—DATE**x**14* ANNUAL UPENCUNB, X 1SUB SUB DESTAIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL MEXP ENCUMDR. BUDGET BALANCE BDOT 410 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 410 21 SUPPLIES 21 70 SUPPLY—AUTOMOTIVE/GAG 410 410 .1..* *A GENERAL GOVERNMENT )D1V 7100 lUIAL PUBLIC WORKS PARRS DEPT 71, TOTAL *N,4***4* LIGHTING LANDSCAPE PARRS O .00 0 0 400 0 .. ,00 0 .00 O .00 6 0 .60 0 .00 6 O .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 o .00 0 O .00 0 o .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 pxomnwn: am,2a7/ 50n or YEAR �°pysoo s wccouwl�pcnzoo ^�//996 ci+y of SailJi /" . ^ pumo 019 couzpwswr wspLmCsxcwT aspr/ozo 4150 puoLzc wox�s oomzwznrnArw/orpssT MAzwrsw*wcs � 'SA tLd8J - - - �cb�[��~------ -�w*�w�w*�CO§�[��****������ wm*�nw***°YE��-TU-�Ar�vrx*.x* ANNUAL- OwsNcuRe^ w aoa aun cIEacnzprzow ouoocr AnrumL msxp muoosT wcru*L. xsxp swcunop, auoosr mALwwcs 13neT q1O GLIV-RAL GLIV-RA-OOuERwMEN T* 41» 21 70 ouppLr-AuTonorzvs/s*o o .00 n o ,00 o .uo o .00 o *10 ** *` mswsxm- aoocnuwcw7 o ,00 o o .00 o .00 n .uo o ozw +1on � |uspr I � / Al. I«J»L *X�*Xmx PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISFRATN 0 o ^»» « ^»« » ^»« » PROGRAM1 00267L 50X OF YEAR rAr.%J. ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 City ol San JdCini0 FUND 029 CEIBO DEPT/DIV 0661 COMM DEV BLOCK GRANT/CDFIG ;BA ELE OBJ ACCOUNT ' , ****04***01CURRENT**Iitmlo4%*** **********7U5IR-TO-DATF****xxx aillUAL UNENCUMB. X: z9UB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL. XEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE t'PGT 440 COMMUNITY SERVICES 440 34 RENTAL 6 CONTRACT SERVICE ▪ 34 05 CONTRACT SERVICES 4596 .00 0 32172 .00 0 .00 55153 55153.00 6 40 il.-4iriTAL 1)L.JiLAYS - I 40 01 CAE-IMPR0VEMENT/OTHER 46760 .00 0 327320 99536.76 30 17415.35 561125 444172.89 21 02 UNLIMITED WORK CENTER 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 03 VERNON WATER LINE 0 .00 - 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 --.50 o - 04 OTDEWAIN CONSTRUCTION 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 05 RIGHT -OE -WAY 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 06 COMIT'TY CENTER BEN000TI5ll 6 .66 6 6 .00 0? S.J. DOWNTOWN STORM DRAIN 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 00 CURB. UUTTER & SIDEWALS 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 09 FLIT -LOT c'. I L- -AEE PARR 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 15 10 LAND ACOUIBITION 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 20 BUILDING DEVELOPMENT 0 . .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00. 0 '1 45 MACHINERY 6 EGUIPMENT 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 40 *4 CAPITAL ouTLrlys 46760 .00 0 327320 99536.76 30 17115.35 561125 444172.09 21 i 440 )0( i0. 51356 .00 0 359492 99536.76 20 17415.35 616270 499325 . 0-9- 1 440 ** ** COMMUNITY SERVICES 51.356 .00 0 359492 99536,76 20 17415.35 616278 499325.09 19 IDIV 0661 tOIAL -4,k4,KN*X crinG 51356 .00 0 :359492 9916.7e, 28 17415.35 616270 499325.89 19 DEPT 06 TOTAL ******* COMM DEV BLOCK GRANT 51756 .00 0 359492 99536.76 20 17415.35 616278 499325.89 19 FOND 029 101AL CDBO 51356 .00 0 .74?2 99536.76 2R 17415.35 616270 499325.89 19 PROGRAM: GM2671 50X OF YEAP I -lwri ACCOUNTING PERIOD -7/1996 Citv ul FUND 020 PARR DEVELOPMENT DEPT/DIV 7100 LIGHTING.LANDSCAPE PARKS/ BA ELE OBJ ACCOOPT *********NURRPNTimm**** *******44x4tAn-TITAIATrAft-m***m ANNUAL uNrNr . SUB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE MGT . . 410 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 410 46-- CAPIML OUTLAYS 40 01 CAP-IMPROVEMENT/UTHER 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 1.0 INTFR-UND TRANSFERS OUT 410 *it 410 Wit '“'* GENERAL GOVERNMENT DiV 71.00 TOTAL N4i)N,10i* PUBLIC WORKH PARKG 71. TOTAL LIGHTING LAND5CAPE PARKS ruND 020 01 AL )403iN*R*)i PARK DEVELOPMENT 0 .00 0 0 1703.00 0 .00 0 1703.00- 0 1154 4542.75 394 0070 7400.25 92 .00 13040 6447.75 53 1154 4542:75 394 007R 107.25 113 .00 13e40 4744( 76Z 1154 1542.75 394 0070 9103.25 113 ,00 13040 4744.75 66 1154 4542.75 394 0070 9103.25 113 .00 13040 4744.75 66 1154 4512.75 394 0070 9103.25 113 1154 4542.75 394 0070 9103.25 113 .00 13040 4744.75 66 . I 30411 4744 . '75 66 PROGRAM; OM:267L SU% OF YEAR LAPSED City of San Jacinto FIJNLI 02U LIUHI INO MAIN'IE_NANCE FUND IIEF'1/DIV 7265 LLMD/70NG A•19 ESF'L. 6 MOUNT. 'BA ELE OBJ ACCOUNT 4********CURRENT********** M*********YEAR-'TO-.DATE****** SUE SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL Y.EXP ENCLIMBR. BUDGET BALANCE 4Ef ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 ANNUT OWN 410 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 410 35 UTILITY 6EFVIL".E 33.10 UTILITIES —WATER 0 .00 0 0 122.76 0 .00 0 410 ** w* (} .00 0 0 122.76 0 .00 0 410 *A 3c* GENERAL GOVERNMENT 0 .00 0 0 122.76+ 0 .00 0 'L'II:: '265 TOTAL ******* ZONE. A-1.9 ESF'L. 6 MOUNT. 0 .00 0 0 122.76 0 .00 172 10TAI_. *k*a:* * L..I._MLI 4b6�'fs 1$6�1 .48 31 3.!ci�5El2 301 O`,':M.713 9]i _f ."- ': ..:1 1. 7.9.7 ,...:.9:, 1. 13 LF.3'S94S.i.25 67 122.76-- 122.76- 122.76— 0 6— ,FUND 023 10TAL ********* I.wTGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND 5B280 22 3© 407960 3699:I.3.24 91 7251.7.97 699373 256941.79 63 PROGRAM GM26%1 City of navi . iito 11- 58% OF YEA,' ' '.PSED ACCOUNT ING PER I Cr FUND 025 LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND DEPT/DIV 72.61 LLMD/ZONE A-I5 SUNNY HILLS Pf-i- ULL ok4.1 AMICIAT m**swairiraicomrmT**** 444.14Wkw5TRRYEAS-TO-DATF444044*444 ANNUAL UNENCUM . SUB SUB DESCRIPTION £UDGET ACTUAL 4EXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXR ENCUMDR. BUDGET BALANCE ppoT . ..-- 410 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 410 35 uTILITY f=in:VICE 3S 10 UTILITIES -WATER 0 .00 0 0 (3.94 0 .00 0 83.94- .00 0 0 n3.7-1 0 .00 0 0.394" - 0 410 Ai( i(44- GENETiAL OUVERNMENF b .00 0 0 03.94 0 .00 0 n3.94- DIV 7261 TOTAL i4iiim*s.x* ZONE A-1S SUNNY HILLS 0 .00 0 0 93.94 0 B3.94- 0 104„1-11hL1 PRUGRAMI GM267L Cilv of San Jacinlo OUUULI 1., 46 50% OF YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING PERIOD 01/1996 FUND 025 LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND DErT/DIV 7260 LLMD/ZONE B-LIGHT SIGNAL URFC .BA ELE OBJ ACCOUNT *********CURRENT********** to*********YEAR-TO-DATExs***** ANNUAL UN 1SUB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL 7/.EXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE 1410 GENERAL UOVERNMENT kio r 21 SUPPLIES , i 21 30 SUPPLIES - JANITORIAL 833 .00 0 5031 1341.72 23 .00 10000 30 rRUFESSIONAL/TECNNICAL 30 90 PROF-UT0ER .1.332 .00 0 9324 259200 20 .00 15'709 34 111NTRACT/LEASE8/REN18 05 CUNTRACT SERVICES 4583 .00 0 32081 47048.24 147 17150.00 55000 9190.24- 117 . ,:5 CITILITi' SERVICE 35 10 UTILITIES -WATER 0 .00 0 0 1106.75 0 .00 0 1106.75- 0 14 UTILITIES:ED15ON 12003 17.19 0 04501 65199.09 77 .00 145000 19000.11 45 3S ;kw UTILITY SERVTGE 12003 17.19 0 84581 66306.64 79 .00 143000 7Gb13.3b 46 8650.28 13 13397.00 16 1 ' 30 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 iM INTER -FUND TRANSFERS OUT .;(ii 4003.70 130 21497 19010.42 92 .071 3685'2 le033.59 54 410 *W *N 21902 4070.97 in 153314 137107.02 90 17150.00 262041 100503.90 59 410 14* *4 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 21902 4020.97 10 1.53314 137107.02 90 17150.00 262041 109503.98 101V 7260 TOTAL *iiiiNN** ZONE D-LIGH1 SIGNAL URFC 21902 4020.97 13 153314 137107.02 90 17150.00 262041 100503.98 SY PROGRAM: 6M26-0 56% OF YEAF City of S.,m-t J to FUND 075 LIGHTINS MAINTENANCE FUND DEPT/DIV 7257 LLMD/7ONE A-13 RAMONA EXPWY EA ECE Ob.) . AcCOURY 44*****o**CUMENT*om*x***** g*****xotW--WYEAR-TG-DATE4X-444iiiii ANNUNC UNEFICOHET--771U-- SUB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBB. BUDGET BALANCE OWIT 410 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 410 3t5 UTILity-SMICE- 35 1.0 UTILITIES -WATER 0 .00 . 0 0 2207.79 0 .00 0 2207.79- 0/ 41.5 4..1 44 0 .00 0 0 7207.79 0 .00 0 2207.79,= 0 I I 1 '4J ACCOUNTING PERIOD '/1996 410 ** *4 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 0 .00 0 0 2207.79 0 .00 0 2207.79- 0 DIV 7257 TOTAL m***m** ZONE A-13 RAMONA EXPWY 9 .00 0 0 2207.79 0 .00 0 2207.79- 0 PROGRAM: GM267L City UT San Jacinto 50X OF YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 FUND 023 LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND DEPT/DIV 7256 LLMD/ZONE A-11 RANCHO SAN JAC. BA ELE. OBJ ACCOUNT wmxiii*****CURRENT********** *********KYEAR-TO-DATE**.txxtt* ANUAL SUB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBR, BUDGET 410 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 410 35 UTILITY SERVICE 35 10 UTIL1TIES-WATER 0 .00 o o 8459.79 o .00 o B459.79-, 0 14 UTILITIES-EDISON 0 .00 6 0 659.32 0 .00 0 659.32- 0 -0 16 *1E1 EPTiiiiTE 0 .66 0 o 34.44 0 .00 o 1: 35 tt* UTILITY SERVTCE. 0 .00 0 0 9153.55 0 .00 0 9153.55- 0 IA 410 *x ii* .00 0 0 9153.55 0 .00 0 ennT;s5= ZS _ BALANCE ppm' 410 RN GENERAL GOVERNMENT 0 .00 0 0 9153.55 0 .00 0 9153.55- 0 hfV 7256 FUTAL ZONE A-11 RANCHO AN JAC 0 00 0 0 9153.5 0 .00 0 9153.55- 0 PROGRAM: 0M26.a. 56% OF YEAR LAP5ED City of San J ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1.996 IBA ELE OBJ AccouNT FUND 0..'.,LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND DEFT/DIV 7255 LLt-M/ZONE A-40 GODODA SPRINGS AnNUPT:- UNENCORBC:-- SUB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL MEXP ENCUMDR. BUDGET BALANCE EIGOT . _ 410 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 410 -35 - UTILITY SERVICE 35 10 UTILITIES -WATER 0 .00 0 0 2319.94 0 .00 0 2319.94- 0 14 UTILITIES-EDISON 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 s.iii iiiii_it ,;EkOftE. 0 .00 0 0 2719,94 0 .00 0 27I9:9A= 0 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITst t5-0 10 iNTEk-rON6 IKANGPLk8 OUT .00 - 0 - 0 .00 0 .00 0 100 -o 410 wt* 0 .00 0 0 2319.94 0 .00 0 2319.94- 0 410 *it. v* GENERAL GOVERNMENT 0 .00 0 0 2319.94 0 .00 0 2319.94- 0 bfki 723.5 tol'AL ZONE A-10 SOBOBA SPRIN0 0 .00 0 0 2319.94 0 .00 0 2319.94- 0 PROGRAM: UM267L 50X OF YEAR LW5ED of San Jacinto - - '1.1ND 02 LIOHTINO MAINTENANCE FUND • DEPT/DIV 7254 LLMD/ZONE A-5 ANN ARBOR BA ELE OBJ ACCOUNT' mma*******CURRENTmm******** *********ftYEAR-TO-BATE******* 1.11TAUAL SUB SUB DESCRIPTION .BUDGET ACTUAL. XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET 410 GENERAL. GOVERNMENT 410 35 UTILITY SERVICE VHUL- ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 toirNcuHE. X BALANCE OBOT 35 10 UTILITIES -WATER 0 .00 0 0 627.30 0 .00 0 3627.30- 0 14 UTILITIES-EDISON 0 .00 0 0 55.570 .00 0 55.57- 0 ** .00 6 o • 0 .00 03682.07- 0 410 4** 0 .00 0 0 3682.07 0 .00 0 3603.97- 0 41c ** GENERAL GOVERNMENT 0 .00 0 0 3602.07 0 .00 0 3602.07- 0 bi0 ZONE A-5 ANN ARDOR 0 .00 0 0 3682.07 0 .00 0 3662.97- 0 5 PROGRAM: GM2?-:— City OF San , Ito V 110u: 5RX OF YE(Nr ',7'527)ED ACCOUNTING PERIG' 7/1996 FUND 025 LIGHTING MAINTENANCE FUND DEPT/DIV 7253 LLMD/ZONE 4—A PARK HILL. VILLAG DA LLE OBJ ACCOUNT ****4***m44CURRMTotsm******* ****m****RYEAR—TO—DAIr44-ii44414 'ANNUAL SUB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXF' ENCUMBR. BUDGET 410 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 410 36 ClItUTTT'SERVTUE- 35 10 UTILITIES -WATER 0 .00 0 0 46.23 0 410 ii4 44 0 .00 0 0 46.27 0 34* GENERAL OOVERNMENT _ 0 .00 0 0 46.23 0 7253 TOTAL. 44***'.4.* ZONE 4—A PARK HILL VILLAG 0 .00 0 0 46.23 0 4:I.() DIV .00 .00 O 46.21— 0 O 46;73= 0 O 46.23— "0 .00 0 46.23— 0 i1J(3FtAN 1 0M2673.. 50X OF YEAR !.. APSED JND 032 PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT FUND DEPT/DIV 7150 LIGHTING LANDSCAPE PARKS/PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT i U- on— ACCOUNT .01-4*KMMMMC`URhENIkw4"K ww* MMM*MM****YErlh._TU._.TIATEif K+iofiii*R - _..._.._ _.. 1UNU UN JB SUB DESCRIPTION DUDGE:T ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL Y.EXF• ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE 10 UENEFAL GOVERNMENT 10 4o Ul4P/'1"AL E3UTLA4g- 40 01 CAP-I11PROVEMENT/OTHER 16667 .00 0 116669 250,00 0 .00 200000 199750.00 _N__. 50 INTER FLINI) AC'i'IV1''!Y 50 10 INTER -FOND TRANSFERS OUT 900 5397.00 600 6300 5397.00 (16 .00 10794 5397.00 - - 4 _..__.._ _.._ __ 5 _ .00 210794 205I47 �-00 d ].O *+r it at -j 7�.+�i7 --- �'397.OU_.. 31 _. 1,229f,9 5647. 00 .rw 10 ;cr GENERAL GOVERNMENT 17567 5397.00 31 :1.22969 5647.00 5 .00 210794 205147.00 ACCOUNTING F'ERI. 7/1996 TV 7150 TOTAL )0' Hai PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT 17567 5'397.00 31 3.:22969 5647.00 5 .00 210794 20:51+17.00 3 EPA 71 TOTAL MMudlit±f #` L..IGHTING LANI]FICAF'E'. PARKS 17567 ' 5797.00 31 122969 564'7.00 'S .00 210794 205 47.00 UND 032 TOTAL 'NW**N*K*"k PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT I'IEi:NT FOND 17567 5397.00 31 122969 ^+ r ,+647.0- ,, .00 21.0 "7 �'4 '� 205147.00 ROOSAM: 9M267L lir of San Jacinio 56% OF YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 UNLI 035 C.F.D. 41 DEPT/DIV 3100 PUELIC SAFETY/ A ELE OBJ ACCOUNT 4***14**%*C1IRRENT*****”*** o_m SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMER. BUDGET BALANCE BUST 130 PUOLIC SAFETY 131 PUBLIC SAFETY 10 PERSONNEL BENEFITS 10 01 SALARIEB-FULL TIME 0 .00 0 0 .00 o .00 0 .00 0 02 SALARIES -OVERTIME 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 10 *A PERSONNEL 13111AEF11Ti 0 .60 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 AI EMPLOYEE DFNEFIlS 11 10 FRINoE BENEFITS 0 .06 o 0 .00 0 .00 0 15 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION 0 .00 0 0 20.32- 0 .00 0 20.32 0 11 44 EMPLOYEE DENEFIFS 0 .00 0 0 20.32- 0 .00 0 20.32 0 .__ 30 PROFES9IONAL/1FCHNTCAL 30 90 PROF-OFFIER 286 .00 0 2002 .00 0 .00 3136 3436.00 0 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 10 INTER -FUND TRANSFERS OUT 735 6715.34 914 5145 6715.34 131 .00 9923 7107.66 76 431 4)4 1,4 PUBLIC GAIETY 1021 6715.34 65a 7147 6695.07 94 .00 12259 5563.98 55 430 ii;,- *4 kj*Lic SAFELY 1021 67115.34 659 7147 6695.02 94 .00 12259 5563.90 . .1,1 OIV 3100 TOTA.I_ 44!fm!4*.:4f* PoLicr 11EFARTMEN1 1021 6715.34 659 7147 6695.02 94 .00 12259 5563.9a SS OEFA 31 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 1021 6715.34 659 7147 6695.07 94 .00 12259 5563.14 ' ruND 035 TO1AL "444N)444,4 i051. 6-7534- 65a 71.7 6695.07 94 .00 17759 5563,§d- 55 ;GGiRAM: GM267' SBX OF YEAR.,! AFSEG i iY 0i San 0 ACCOUNTING F ERIrir' c°o7/1996 JNLI 036 C.F.D. 42 --ACCGUNT DEPT/DIV 3100 PUBLIC SAFETY/ :c********_OMENT********** **w*******YEAR-TC-DATF*****xi. ANNUAL UN JD SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXF' BUDGET ACTUAL. XEXF• ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BDGT ------------------ 30 PUBLIC SAFETY 31 PUBLIC SAFETY -ib- --PERSONNEL-DEN€FITS-. 10 01 SALARIES-•FUL..L TIME 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 02 SAL_ARIE'3--IJVERTIME 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 10 44 F'Ei:m..WiN jEa_ ILLNE'Jm 0 :00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 11 EMPLUYEE BENEFITS ii ib rRRiNG EENEFITS - 75 .00 G 0 .00 0 .00 0 OQ O 15 RETIREMEI-IT CONTRIBUTION 0 .00 0 0 104.46- 0 .00 0 104.46 0 11 ww EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0 .00 0 0 104.46- 0 .00 0 104.46 0 34 VEHICL.ES/EIIIJIF'PIENT 34 50 VEHICLES-RENT/LEASES 465 .00 0 3255 .00 0 .00 5500 5500.00 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 10 INTE'R'-FUUND TRANSFERS OIJT 3401 :23h61.26 600 24367 2366:L.26 97 .00 4.1.769 18107.74 57 946 2366.I. .26 600 27622 2355.A0 I15 .00 473.9 23792.20 50 3o ui+ ;4 F•UE4L.iC taE'C'1'Y .. ...T3946 23661.26 -600 - ' 27622 73556.00 05 .00 47349 ..._37927.'0 :.,0 3:1. *k h* PUBLIC SAFE:TI' i:IV 3100 TOTAL ww*w**w F•GL.1 L F iE_f"AL�1 L1E::IJT _;394t�. - 2366 I : 76 600 27672 23r56. oo 17;'; .00 47349 23792.20 50 ,EF1 31 TOTAL ******* _.._.._ _.. ._. n 7' - 2 1 22 2 5c F'U£4 _Ir., '3AF�1-'! 3.4b ..36,3.I.:._fi...600 ,.7b.:..� .:3..,.;6.f30 05 .00 473.19 23792:20 UND 036 TOTAL *****w*** !N4e1 g"36/, L .76 AO6 29677 27556, 00 05 .00 17347 23792.20 50 diGNAM: CM26/1. 5B% OF YEAR LAPSED liv of San Jacinto - - UNE' 031 C.F.D. 43 DEPT/DIV 3100 PUBLIC SAFETY/ A ELE ONJ ACCOUNT 4444%*mon**CURRENT********** **********YEAR-TO-DATEx*x**** ANNUAL N UB BUB DESCRIPTION 'BUDGET ACTUAL XEXF' BUDGET ACTUAL Y.EXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE ?DOT - -- , 30 PUBLIC SAFETY 31 PUBLIC SAFETY 10 PERSONNEL BENEFITS 10 01 SALARIES -FULL TIME 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 02 SALARIES -OVERTIME 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 :1.0 ii.i PERSONNEL BENEFITS 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 11 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11 10 FRINUE BENEFITS .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 :00 0 15 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTION 0 .00 0 0 165.41- 0 .00 0 165.41 11 *x EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0. .00 0 0 165.91- 0 .00 0 165.41 0 . _ 30 FROFESSIONAL/TECHNiCAL 30 90 PROF -OTHER 477 .00 0 3339 1352.51 91 2900.00 5720 1475.99 79 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 10 INTER -FUND TRANSFERS OUT 7126 90136.18 676 49002 40176.18 97 .00 85511 37374.82 56 *N NN PUBLIC SOFEEIY 7603 46136.11-3 633 53221 49323.213 93 2900.00 91239 39015.72 57 130 *4 *# softTy 7603 ,401.36:18 613 53221 49323.20 93 2900.00 91239 39oiS.72 -15-1 TIV 3100 TurAL_****N*N POLICE uErARrilENI W;o:-. .iiej.iiiTi i',: 53221 49323.20 93 2900.00 9 L239 )EPT 31 TOTAL ******* PUBLIC SAFETY 7603 401.36.18 633 53221 49323.20 93 2900.00 91239 39015,72 -s-7 ''UND 037 TIJIAL ********* C.F.U. 13 7603 40136.18 633 53221 49323.1,1 93 2900.00 91239 39015.72 57 i0URAM. GM2671.. I tv of San nto 58X OF YEAR .:5. APSED ACCOUNTING FERTOT'^-+07/.1996 JND 03U UNDERGROUND UTILITY >I CL g.1 ACCOUNT alm*******`URRENTMMMe*****M 4M*.****4*YEAR—T0TATE_xx4X'i•Fka $SNN[TAL— JP SUB UESCRIPTIUN BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET IIEPT/DIV 4150 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISIRATN/STREET MAINTENANCE 10 GENERAL UUVERNMEN'T 1.0 50 INTER FUND ICTIV3FY 50 10 INTER —FUND TRANSFERS OUT' 996 5974.00 600 6972 5974.00 86 .00 11940 5974.00 50 aTi VY8 E 74:00-`�00 6972 _ .7974.00 O6 .00 11940 5974 U0— 50 10 ** *a' GENERAL GOVERNMENT 996 5974.00 600 6972 5974.00 06 .00 1.1948 5974.00 50 • IV 4150 'TOTAL ******* STREET MAINTENANCE 996 5974.00 600 6972 5974.00 86 .00 1194E 5974.00 50 EFT 11 TOTAL *****M* FI.IE(_l:C WORKS AUMINI:STRATN 996 59'74.00 600 6972 5974.00 8E. .00 11949 59'74.00 50 IJND 030 'TOTAL MMMMI+MM** UNDERGROUND UTILITY 996 5974.00 600 6973 5974.00 86 .00 11940 5974.00 50 UUitiflfl Un26 Il_ 58% OF YEW' L..AF'SE_D ACCOl.1N'I'ING PERIOD 07/1996 Iv of S.311 Jac 111'10 D 039 FLOOD CONTROL IIE:FT/DIV 4155 F'UBL.IC WORKS ADMINISTRATN/DFAINAGE.: FACILITIES ELE OPJ ACCOUNT *********CURRENT********** **********YEAR-•TO-DATE*****x* ANNUAL UNENCUMP. X IN SUB DESCRIETION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXF BUDGET ACTUAL. XEXF ENCUMPR. BUDGET BALANCE BEIOT .0 GENERAL.. GOVERNMENT .0 40 CAPITAL OUTLAYS .. 40 01 CAP-IMPROVEMENT/OTHER 6000 .00 0 42000 40519.00 .1.16 .00 72000 23481.00 67 `.;0 IIJ'IE:F FUND ACTIVITY 50 :LO IN'l ER-+(JNLI TRANSFERS OUT 1503 9`,;00.00 600 11081 9500.00 66 .00 1.9000 9500.00 50 .0 4* 44N. 7593 9500.00 12S '530£Sll. 50019.00 109 .00 91000 32-901..0U 7i4 GENERAL. GOVERNMENT 7583 9500.00 125 53081 58019.00 109 .00 91000 32981.00 64 kV 4:153 TOTAL **xi.*aa*. DRAINAGE FACi1...IT1:E0 7503 9500.00 125 53001 5001.9.00 109 .00 91000 32901.00 64 F°T 41 'TOTAL ***+t*+:* PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATN 7583 9500.00 125 53001 5801.9.00 109 .00 91000 32981.00 64 .1NLI 019 TOTAL ** kr+ax** FLOLID CON1ROL. 7503 9500.00 125 53001 5001.9.00 1.09 .00 91000 • 32901.00 64 iUP12.OrL 50.3.01 tIE AN 1 AT 'SET) of Sdu 11(0 ACCOUNTING FE.E11011.07/1996 UND 041 TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION DEPT/DIV 4155 PUBLIC WIloiKE3 ADMINISTRATN/DRAINAGE FACILITIES 4=1 ELF WO ACCOUNT***cur***** *******A3.0e9rARTO-:-BATE*4171414...-R- ANNUAL7.- AJB SUB - DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL. MEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE ini T - ------- - - - 40 40 OENERAL OUVERNMENT 46- UAP1TAL OUTLAYS 40 01 CP-IMPROVEMENT/OTHER 20000 :.00 0 140000 16487.52 12 21000.49 240000 201704.00 16 56 '-.04k 1,041J ACTIVITT 50 10 1NTER-FUN1:'TRANSFERS OUT 2739 13924.83 505 19166 16949.91 (10 .00 32959 15908.19 52 0.0 4'14 4 227313 13G24.91 61 . 159166 33437.33 21 21808.49 2721158 217612.1 0 40 4;4 iE* GENERAL GOVERNMENT .22739 13924.83 61 159166 33437.33 21 21809.413 272958 217612.19 26 110 4155 TOTAL DRAINAGE FACILITIES 22739 13924.93 61 159166 33437.33 21 21800.49 272058 217612.19 20 1EFT 41 TOTAL 4.im/i PupLIc WORKS ADMINISTRATN 22738 13924.93 61 159166 33477.33 21 21909.,8 272858 217612.19 20 . 111411 041 T9TAL i444444441k*" FRAFFIC SIDNALIZAlION 22738 13824.93 61 159166 33437.33 21 21000.49 272958 217642t19 20 ,.ROGRAM1 GM267L 5SX OF YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 711y 61. San Jacinto ------- - • -- 7UND 042 A.D. 07-1 DEBT SERVICE DEFT/DIV B501 94/1/ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BA ELE OBJ ACCOUNT 4*******NCURRENT4*****%*** **********YEAR-TO-DATE******* AANUAL UNENCUMB. X RUB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXF BUDGET ACTUAL. XEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BDOT 450 ENTERPRISE 450 30 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL 30 90 PROF -OTHER 1250 202.79 16 0750 1193.32 14 .00 15000 13916.69 8 :40 ** );w 1250 202.79 16 0750 1183.3 14 .00 15000 13016.68 0 4130 ** ** ENTERER-1E 1250 207.79. 16 0750 ILE33.132 14 .00 15000 13016.68 8 '—' DIV 0501 TOTAL +4***4f44s ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1250 202.79 16 9750 1193.32 14 .00 15000 13816.69 9 DEFT 05 TOTAL 14*NNNiiii 94/1 1250 202.79 16 8750 '1103.32 14 .00 15000 13016.68 0 FUND 042 TOTAL MW404***** A.D. 07-1 DEBT SERVICE 1250 202.79. 16 9750 I1013.32 14 .00 15000 13016.69 8 58% OF ILF41-:1,....ANAPTA City 01 'into ACCOUNTING PERIOD,,07/1996 FUND 043 ASSMENT DIS1. NU 94-1 DEFT/DIV 8501 574/1/ASSMENT DISTRICT FIA VLViffiJ-------- i.m.tOUNT 4*******4CUMENTiix44Tk***** 3.4i47.144*1iWTrAR-T0-DATEk.ir*-44v..4 ANNUAL UNENEGMB. 14. 9U13 SUti VESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL NEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE PLOT 450 ENTERFRISE 450 .•-36. -PktititiNAL?TnIINIC6L 30 90 PR0E-0THER 1042 106.83 18 7294 2103.12 29 .00 12500 10396.28 17 0 INTER row.At;i1ViTY 50 10 117W.1-;:-T'0N1:, TRANSFERS OUT 125 750.00 600 075 70.00 A6 .00 1.500 750.00 50 60 DEDT SERVICERENUIRENENT 60 10 PRI13CIPAL. 1947 .00 0 13629 .00 0 .00 23367 23367.00 0 in INTEREST PAYMENT 3470 .00 0 24290 .00 0 .00 41643 41643.00 0 60 ,,H(- bitii Lio.iii-.:L C4,:iiiiitihENT - t:',41 7 .06 0 37919 .00 0 .01.-i 65010 65010;(56-- 0 4130 4c-x -,i)i 61313.1 936.173 14 46000 2053.72 6 .00 79010 76156.213 4 _ ._. 450 *4 ikff ENTERPRISE 6584 936.83 14 46008 2053.72 6 .00 79010 76156.28 4 MO b'Joi TLITL 1111-ki11f ASSESSMENT- DISTRjCP 6594 Y:56..(13 lA 46000 2953.7 6 .00 79010 76156.20 ,ri DEFT 85 TOTAL *N14*** 94/1 6504 936.83 14 460813 2053.72 6 .00 79010 76156.28 4 ruin: i43 10TAL -Km).:..* ASSESSMENT 1:'I131. NO 94-1 6584 976.83 14 16088 2053.72 6 .00 79010 761.56.213 PROOF:AM: M11671_ City tt1 San Jacinto 5t3 OF YEAR LAPSED Em0B 60 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 FUNB 046 C.F.D. 42 - DEBT SERVICE DEPT/DIV 0000 DEBT SERVICE/ 'Fir' ELL OEIJ ACCOUNT 4********CURRENTitht**** iiithiTt-YE.AR-1O-DAIEY,titi4oirt. ANNUAL LIFMUTRIT. h !SUB 8UB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL. XEXP ENCUMBRi BUDGET BALANCE BLOT D150 ENTERPRISE 1450 30 PROFESSIONAE/TECONiOAL 30 90 FROF-OTHER 2917 10040.00- 372- 20419 0390.17 41 .00 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 10 1111ER-1UND FRANSFMS OUT 2011 16067.50 600 19677 16067,50 06 .00 60 L)EDF SERVICE REllUIREMENT 60 10 PRINCIPAL 16250 .00 0 113750 ,00 0 .00 195000 195000.00 15 INTEREST PAYME41 166251 .00 0 1163757 .00 0 .00 1995008 1995008.00 60 ao 6i476 BERYICE EAEUOIREMENI 187501 .00 0 1277507 .00 0 .00 2190000 2190600:66 -.10 x4, 180229 6077.50 3 1317603 25257.67 2 450 att ao ENTERPRISE A00229 6027.50 3 1317603 25257.67 2 DIV ileoo TOTAL 4,iNiif* DED1 SERVICE 180279 6027.50 3 1317603 2:57.67 2 ii,T.T 60 TOTAL **MWMNie DEBT SERVICE 108229 '6027.50 3 1317603 25757,67 2 r6i4ii 046 MEAL 1-4*Nik*A*** ! C.F.U. 42 - DEBT SERVICE 100229 6027.50 3 1317603 25257.67 2 35000 26609.03 24 33735 16067.50 50 .00 2250743 2223405.33 1 .00 2250743 2233405.33 1 .00 2250743 2233405.33 .00 2250743 2233405.33 1 .00 2250743 2233405.33 58X OF YEAR LAPsoI.1 AC: CO LINT:I:N1 F'ER I 0 7i 1996 "f\IJIJI-CHI`I i I11'1.,',fl( U l Sao i lll () =UNIT 050 WA'F tii., FUND LEF'i/DIV 9000 WATER/ IA EI..E ON.J ACC-OUNT444*.ANi4toltURnrWT*4m**4.1*m%* mxx'x*strait`4YCAR...TO-DAlt*i104w:ii ANNUAL UNF..NI'.UMU. X ',LIB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXF' BUDGET ACTLIAL. XEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BLOT 450 450 ENTERPRISE F'ERS(7NNEL. EiEWP/T3 10 01 SALARIES -FULL T.LME. 11927 17624.76 14B 03489 74159.45 89 .00 14.3127 69967.55 52 02 SALARIES--OVERTIIIE 700 737.51 105 4900 3990.00 91. .00 9400 4110.00- 48 03 9ALRLIE8--FARI TIP11:: 807 777.00 120 4249 6921.50 1.61 .00 7290 458.50 " 94 10 ** PERSONNE:I... DENEETTG 13234 1.93.39.27 .t45 92638 04770.95 '"s .00 1.5E11107 73836.05 54 11 EMPL..UYEE BE::NEI"'TTF3 11 10 FRINUE BENEFITS 2093 2012.79 134 14651 1372 t.14 94 .00 25117 11394.06 35 15 RETIREMENT CUNIRADOTION .1.577 2109.17 134 1.1039 9597.15 1.97 .00 10921 9323.95 51 20 'Os F IIEi,1-L III 566 1010.93 :179 3962 4236.52 107 .00 6795 2 550;40 62 .1.1 tic I.IPIFI OILE:: EIENI.J. 1)S 4236 ls'37.89 140 29652 27555.01 9:3 00 50833 :'3217.19 54 1 13UP1''LIES " 21. 10 OFFICE 9UF'PL_1:ES/PUSAOF 1667 1001.10 60 11669 Ea02.23 70 .00 20000 11797.77 41 35 UNIFORM 6 SAFETY El.7PT. 125 .00 0 875 8550.99 97 .00 1.500 649.01 57 70 S(JF'FL.Y-"ALIU1l1OTIVE/GAiS 0 .00 (i 0 104.93 0 .00 0 184..93- 0 00 SM'IAL..i_. Toil l...S/FUUIPMI_,NT 125 .00 0 075 E33.66 ..0 .00 1500 1416.34 6 71. ** SUPPLIES 191.7 1001.. 1.0 52 1.3419 9321..01 70 .00 23000 13678.19 41 30 F'RCIFESSIONAL/TECHN:CCAL 30 90 F'RoF'....BTHEr 2233 .00 0 15631. 1.0969.52 70 .00 26000 1(3830.48 41 31 1 RAVEL 6 1113:E::TINI:i COMTS 3.1. 15 M IL E AUE REIMBURSEMENT 12 '.511. 00 1:38 294 960.41 327 .00 500 460.41- 192 '0 COM /SEI1IHAFlL/wokksI615- 4:). .00 0 294 536.22 102 .00 500 36.22= Ia7 _, 31. ** TRAVEL. Cl METING COSTS 04 50.00 69 500 1496.63 3 :'' .00 :1.000 496.637 150 3:3 I11111'A1.R 7. MAINTENANCE 3.3 10 Rill--'I3Ll7:l_.DANUS E333 .00 0 503:1. .00 0 .00 10000 10000.00 0 :30 Ril1 L uu,I:E'3'J. 31T 7250 4110.08 50 50750 66 3:33.08 1.31 . 00 E17000 20476.12 77 50 R/M MU Lor VF:H:LC7L.Eo .. 1011 462.66 40 70'T7 5713.02 0.1. .00 12134 b-420.913 47 33 14. REP01:R N MAINTENANCE . 9094 4572.74 50 63650 72236.90 1.14 .00 109134 36897.1.0 66 3*L RENTAL 6 CONTRACT SERVICE .14 05 COME:A1:;T SERVICE 4.1.7 12 94 .L373 2919 10252.'li- :35.1. .00 5000 5252.59- 205 35 UTIL_IT`( SERVIC 33 10 0) IL.ITIES--WAT ER 42 41..53 99 244 4436.22 1.509 .00 500 3936.22- 887 12 UTILITIES -OAS 17 .00 0 119 .00 0 .00 200 200.00 0 _ e _ _ 1.4 L11.11 II�CCi::.7 I Il:f!io1J I,:;.l.?',;i .00 J :1.366rS l.ab.L'7:°i.Ei26 .!?:? .00 �13.1:300 F.aCJa.24.9.4 i1. 16 TELEPHONE HONL 267 1.'3.51 65 1869 1.032.97 9E3 .00 3200 1.367.03 57 ::35 l: at UTILITY SERVICE 19G51. 215.04 1 1.:38957 172445.05 1 4 /. . .,) � 2.38200 65754.9Fi 72 36 OTHER SERVICES] 6 CHARGES 36 95 MANLHTSE F111.: 15733 72620.53 144 1.101.31 134032.3,3 .1.22 .00 1.E1E8800 54767.67 71 37 INSURAN::E/ DON11E 37 05 I890RANC:E 417 .00 0 2919 1000.00 34 .00 5000 4000.00 20 EGORr.1111 0112671... Tty ut San Tocinto 50X OF YEAR LAPSED ACCOUN1ING PERIOD 07/1996 ------------------. . , AIND OSO WATER FUND DEPT/DIV 9000 WATER/ IA ELE OBJ ACCOUNT 4.6********CURRENT****4****** *****%****YEAN-TO-DATE****Am* ANNUAL 0174ENCUMfi. X UB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL MEXP BUDGET ACTUAL MEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE DM- -- - 150 ISO ENTERPRISE. 50 INTER ViA6 ALtiOl'h ,-,.o 10 INTER -FUND TRANSFERS OUT 11120 1096.30- 10- 77040 85494.34 110 .00 133139 47944.66 64 60 DEIN. SERVICE RETIUITENT .00 25000 14501 0 25000.00 0 60 10 PRINCIPAL 2003 .00 0,00 . 15 INTEREST PAYMENT 11120 .00 0 77096 66265.00 T;. .oo .00 133530 6726500 50 60 4)k DEBT SRE ERVICE OUIREMENT 13211 .00 0 92477 66265.00 150530 5.226* : 00 42 150 itit itx. 91547 531111.21 50 640829 676040.93 106 .00 1090543 422502.07 62 150 ..... *h ENTERPRISE: 71547 53101.21 50 640029 676040.93 106 .00 1.090543 422502.07 62 iIV 9000 TOTAL 54441-4,4-* WATER: CAPITAL IMP1 ROVEMENT 91547 5301640029 .21 5A 676040.93 106 .00 1090543 422502.07 62 90 TOTAL WATER 91547 53101.21 514 640029 676040.73 106 ,00 l0933543 422502.07 62 3IND 050 TOTAL ift6*44+,04-44<- WAlER FUND 91547 53181.21 50 640829 676040.93 106 .00 1090543 422502.07 62 7,1117. UF ILhHt4WSED f)CCOUN1ING PERIOD 07/1996 . . .. ... . . _ . . . . . . . _ city or f3an ---:Into FUND 051 WA1 g. .- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT DEPT/DIV 9000 WATER/ DA ELE OBj AECOURT -7gT4T1-44447A7*iCURRENTIK**m******ANNUAL UNENCUPUT. N SUB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL MEW BUDGET ACTUAL NExP ENCUMBR. DUDGET BALANCE DDGT 450 ENTERPRISE 450. So riktif:t8iil 1 b1,1L-7Uti-,IN tLrAL --------- 30 90 PROF-.00 OTHER 0 .00 0 0 61.05 0 0 61.05- 0 46 i:ripITAL WTLAyn w 20 GAP -BUILDING D.06 DEVELOPMENT 033 0 .00 50 10000.00 0 10000 5031 12250.00 14820.26 29 4'J CAP -MACHINERY e. EUU1PMENT 1750 .00 0 6179.7221000 40. *or CAPITAL OUILAYS 75e3 .00 - 0 18081 6179.77 34 .00. 3.1000 24820:28- • "20 - .00 450 ikm, *x. 2503 .00 0 18061 6740.77 35 :: .00 31000 7 4759,23 20. 4501,H4 44 ENTERPRISE 250.00 31000 3 .00 0 18001 6240.77 24759.23 20 610 9000 tTOTAL41.FAN WATER CAPI1AL IMPROVEMENT 2563 .00 0 10001 ' 6240.77 35 .00 31000 74759.23 20 iA*i 96 il..)ML 31.4)76-i4 wATER 7563 .00 0 6240.42 3T000 10001 .00 24759.23 20 .00 k il.k4i) 651 TOTAL 4i4444%-k44 111081 WATER CArTiAL IMPROVEMENT.00 0 6240.77 35 31000 24759.23 20 2593 PROGRAM; 0826i1- SOX OF YEAR TApsEn ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 Citv of San Jacinto FUND 055 SEWER MAIMT & DEVELOPMENT DEFT/Diu 4170 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATN/SEWER TRANSMISSION OPERT BA ELE OBJ ACCOUNT 44***44****CURRENT**1******** **YE'TO-DATE******* ANNLIAT.---- UREFICIJHB. X SUS SUB DESCRIPTION . ' BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMDR. DODGET BALANCE BDOT 4.50 ENTERPRISE !450 io Ef-:surv4EL BEN-LFIT _ i 10 01 SALARIES -FULL TIME 915 .00 0 5705 4767.00 [349777 4 .00 5010.00 49 11 EMPLOYEE DENIT1HE. • 1276.50 1(11113 El 10 FRINGE BENEFITS 175 .00 0 1225 .00 '.1.115 020.50 61 15 RETIREMENT' CONTRIBUTION 100 .00 0 756 630,00 .00 663.00 49 20 INS PREM-LTD 6 .00 0 0 19131 .00 0 0 1403.50 56 11 *ft EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 203 .00 01906.50 96 .00 3390 .:(0 21 SUPPLIES 1050 21 10 OFFICE SUPPLIES/POSTAGE 150 .00 0 525.60 50 .00-T() 1000 1274.40 29 35 UNIFORM & SAFETY EUPT. 03 .00 ' 0 581 217.45 37 702.55 22 1000 80 SMALL TOOLS/FOUIPMENT 63 .00 0 411 471.41 107750 27IaS9 :"63 21 14* SUPPLIES 296 .00 0 2072 1211.46 59 2335.54 34 3550 . . . 30 PROFESSIONAL/lECHNICAL 30 90 1ROF-1011ER 667 .00 0 4669 3137.50 6 i .00 .00 0000 4862.50 :39 31 TRAVEL & MEETING COSTS 31. 20 cow/SEMTNARS/WORK9HOPS 42 .00 0 294 0 0 .00 500 500.00 33 REPAIR . MAINTENANCE 33 30 R/M-E131J1PMENT 250 49.91 20 1750 2290.74 131 13 .00 3000 709.26 76 50 R/M-MOTOR VEHICLES 460 48.53 10 .00 5201.55 7 408.15 5610 5910.8J-- 31------ 33 MX' REPAIR & MAINTENANCE nei 99.t4 14 3276 5026 2699.19 54 .00 0610 34 RENTAL & T CONRT ACSERVICE 34 05 CONTRACT SERVICE 8050 11150 .66 0 3131.06 39 10660.94 23 ULIY 35 TITSERVICE 35 11 UTILITIES-EDISON 100 .00 0 756 103.33 24 .00 13000 1300 1116.67 14 16 TELEPHONE 171 56.84 33 1197 1953 600.95 5B1361.15 34 35 )/i UTILITY SERVICE 279 56.94 20 45 2050112477.82 26 072.10 j 36 OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 36 95 ERnNCHIBE FEE 3766 3977.98 106 26362 24914.10 95 .00 . 45194 20279.90 5.., 37 INSURANCE/BONDS 37 05 INSURANCE 333 .00 0 2331 .00 0 .00 4000 4000.00 0 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 10 INTER -FUND TRANSFERS OUT 6975 4443 s 7e, 64 48025 50367.46 103 .00 03700 :33332.54 60 450 itI1. WI+ 15324 0576.92 56 107260 93009.45 07 .00 103971 90861.55 51 150 v.. ll 1111EkITUS1 15324 13576.93 56 10/260 9300°.45 n7 .00 1030(1 90961.55 51. DIV 4170 TOTAL xl*ttftifit,4 SEWER TRANsMISSIoN ).)PERT 15324 0576.92 56 1'07268 93009.45 337 .00 103071 90861.55 Si 1-0)1iR'iM: 01126TL 50X OF YEAR —I APSED . . ACCOUN1ING PERIP. 07/1996 ,—, 'into ,.,.. '1.1N11 0 SEWER MAINT & DEVELOPMENT DEPT/DIV 4170 PUBLIC WURKS ADMINISTRATN/5EWER TRANSMISSION fll 66 R-Lr. titi-i ActbURT 44444*******CURRENT******xits* *******4470707EAR—TOUATP****x** ANNUAL UNENLUMB. X BUD SUB DESCRIPTION PUDOET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BUST DEFT 41 TOTAL 1***%*11- PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATN 157-;24 8576.92 56 107268 93009.45 n7 .00 103071 90061.55 51 FUND 055 TOTAL 4titt34****14 SEWER MAIM & DEVELOPMENT T.5324 0576.92 56 107260 93009.45 07 .00 103071 90061.55 51 RU(3RAM t U1126 7L 11v vY San Jacinto 580 OF YEAR LAPSEll ACCI:IIJN'r:I:N13 PERIOD 0'7/1996 131 tan tc.e PUBLIC BAl''i 1 Y 130 wa+ **k PUBLIC SAFETY lIV 3100 TOTAL +t*+r+nx srx POI_ LL 1 . DEPARTMENT LJND 061 ASSET FORFEITIJRE/SEIZIJRE DEPT/LIIV 3100 PUBLIC SAFETY/ A ELE OBJ ACCOUNT'+++r+ra+a+r++-+r++CURRENT++rr+t+t +rrrk arM*+rilrr+r++rYEAR--TO i:iflTFKsecex•n+r+a ANNUAL. UNtNCLJl4. UB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL YFXF° ENFSJMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BLOT 30 F'LIBLIC SAFETY 31 PUBLIC SAFETY 10 PERSONNEL. BENEFITS :10 01 :3AL.ARIES-FlJLL TINE 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 02 FSALARIES-OVERTIME 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 O .00 0 O .00 0 .00 0 :i.0 Ni : PERSONNEL_ BENEFITS 0 .00 0 ,O© C) 1.1 EMPLOYEE DEi:NEF[ 1'0 11 10 FRINUE BENEFITS 0 . .00 0 0 .00' 0 .00 0 .00.. 1`5 RETIREMENT CONTRIOIJIION 0 .00 0 0 228.46-- 0 .00 0 220.46 0 :I.:l I.H EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 0 .00 0 0 0.46- 0 .00 0 228.46 0 34 VE:Fi:FCLLO/E4:IJLI:LPMc:NT 34 05 CONTRACT SERVICES 0 .00 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 50 INTER FUND ACTIVIT'r 50 10 INTER --FUND TRANSFERS OUT 5000 .00 0 35000 31749.00 91 .00 60000 28250. 20 53 5000 .00 0 35000 31521.34 90 .00 60000 28470.66 53 5000 .00 0 35000 315Si1.34 90 .00 60000 28478.66 53 5000 .00 0 35000 31521.34 90 .00 60000 20470 66 53 :F:F1' 31, TOTAL, uaa+ex+rux PUBLIC SAFE 'T'Y 5000 .00 0 :3`.4000 3:1.521..3+1 90 .00 60000 2047E3.66 53 LJND 061 TOTAL ++#4+t1+tt*+r+4 ASSET FURFE l TURF/r.F F/IIRE:: , 0000 .00 0 3'.ii000 31 i2 a..:3-5 90 .00 60000 20470.66 53 .aJUUAM: UM:2.611_ 5n% OF YEAR LAPSED itv of San nto ACCOUNTING PER104.07/1996 JND 062 1/2X SALES TAX FUND DEET/DIV 3100 PUBLIC SArETY/ 6.14J AcLOUNT -Raw.T4**16ituRREN1 **4.0.91-**Wk-- 7*-44-olWATCONYEAR-TD-DATEiNN4**4W ANNUAL UNENCUMF. 7. JD SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL %EXF ENCUNBR. BUDGET BALANCE 30 , rum= SAFETY 31 PUBLIC. SAFETY 34 OEFitcLailUIPMLNI 34 05 CONTRACT SERVICES 197 .00 0 1379 .00 0 .00 2365 2365.00 0 so VEHICLES-RENT/LEASES 3167 .00 0 22169 37634.35 171 .00 39000 165.65 100 34 4vtillIcLE/L1)UTF11011 7764 00 0 735411 37034.35 161 .00 40365 2530.65 -94 40 CAPITAL OUTLAYS 40 45 CAP-MAC01NERY & EtwirMENT :Loin 00 0 211.05 7459.06 35 .00 36100 29720.94-- 21 31 AA *m PUBLIC SAFETY 6379 .00 0 44653 45293.41 101 .00 76545 31251.59 59 .30 i''K 3o,- PUDLIC SAFETY c;779 .00 0 44653 45293,41 101 .00 76545 31251.59 59 IV :5100 foVAL *iiik$*,k)i POLICE DEPARTMENT 6379 .00 0 44653 45293.41 101 .00 76545 31251.59 59 17:Pf Ji TdrAL i-AAAAK PUBLIC 1341E1Y 6379 .00 0 44653 45273.41 101 .00 76545 31251,59 59 UNIT 62 TOTAL tEKiiimi4a*K 1/2% SALES TAX FUND ‘ 6379 .00 0 44653 45793.4.1 101 .00 76545 31251.59 59 aitiRAM: eL ity oV San Jacinto no% OF YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 1ND 063 AIR OUALITY IMPROVPMENT DEPT/DIV 1700 COMM. DEVLP.-FLANNING/ i ELE OMJ ACCOUNT 4********CURRENT*****m**** ****04**YEAR-TO-DAJEirliii ANNUAL azwayFer.------- JB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL NEXP BUDGET ACTUAL NEXP ENCUMDR. BUDGET BALANCE BEIGT 10 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 10 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY no LO INTER -FUND TRANSFERS OUT 2063 .00 0 14581 6356.0H 44 .00 25000 10641.92 .1c- .1.,J 10 i(* 2003 .00 0 14501 6350.00 44 .00 25000 10641.92 27; 10 1(N- ,iR OENERAL OOVERNMENT 2083 .00 0 14561 6350 . 00 44 .00 25000 16641.92 25 9 IV 1700 TOTAL 4......NA*x PLANNINB 2003 .00 0 145BI 6:5F;Fl.ort 44 .00 25000 16641.92 25 EPT 17 TOTAL it*i-u-Aafw* COMM. IIEVLP.-PLAWNING 2003 .00_ 0 14501 6350 • 00 44 .00 25000 16641.92 25 LING 063 TOTAL 0***itItiF4if AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ' 2063 .00 0 14501 6350.011 44 .00 25000 10641.92 ->s �uoo*m; ox2671~~` �ox or Ysm� ����^ I'll .'orSao~� to !wu oao rnunl Fuwu onxouw/ ocpr/ozo 8050 Tnuyr ruwo cLsAnzwo/rxuar ruwo / V[� omi — �- ^CcUDAT wmwoxc umpm.�U*n. 9 ll� SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET AC'I I lAl-, Y E. X P ENCOMBR. BUDOFT BALANCE BDOT nm onmx/wz/, osnvznsa or osmsxAL usnozCFg 20 KI-ScE[LAAE003 � 28 n+ u^k^ woaoczAn�n o ,ao u o ^no v ,00 u .00 w 05 s^*^u.o. u .00 G u ^oo o .00 o ^on o �a I- wn|xaum/c/Fsw* ,0u o O .uo o .on o .nn n n7 svzuswcs wowzso o ^uo u o ^uo u .no u cn *� wzncELLawsoun u .no o o ^oo o ^oo o ,00 o _ �n asnvIIcsu o ^oo u n ^ou o ,00 o ^oo 0 uunnu|uIr ssnvicL s 00 O O ,00 o ^oo Iv co,50 ;uIA«- ****°a+ .�, ��o^n � x� " . ^. . ...~. .`"`" ° ,vv v v ,00 o .ov o ,no--o ` ,pT po TOTAL ******* Iwu oa', To|m- ]Rusr p/mo wcco0;r .Oo o o .00 V .00 o 0--0 � }!� ^ moRAm: 9112671. 59% OF YEAR LAPSED ity oF San Jacinto , IND 066 RECYCLING TRUST FUND DEPT/DIV G051 TRUST FUND CLEARING/RECYCLING N ELE ODJ ACCOUNT 44444444*****CURNENT********** ig*********YEAR-TO-DATE******* ANNUAL UNERMAr. JD BUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL %E.XF BUDGET ACTUAL %Exp ENCUMDR. BUDGET BALANCE BDOT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 50 ENTERPRISE SO 10 rd-4s0isiNEL fiEl,itFtT 10 02 SALAPIES-OVERTIMF 0 .00 0 0 353.96 0 .00 0 353.96- 0 II EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 11 10 FRINGE BETTEFIlS 0 .00 0 0 15.95 0 .00 0 15.95- 34 RENTAL N cjNrRi3cr SERVICE 34 05 CONTRACT SERVICE 208 .00 0 1456 2706.79 186 .00 2500 206.79- 108 06 CITY TO CITY C0NTRACT 27004 .00 0 199029 153375.34 91 .00 324042 170666.66 47 34 )ili RENIAL 6 LONFRACT SEPVICE 2721.2 .00 0 190404 156002.13 02 .00 326542 1704FJP:D7 --4e 36 OTHER SERVICES 6 CHARGEO 36 25 ADVERTISING 167 .00 0 11.69 .00 0 .00 2000 2000.00 --- -0------- 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 10 INTER -FUND 1RAWWER1:3 001 4063.75 109 26060 25716.75 99 .00 44693 ibe;574:2N SO 50 *if *11- 31103 4063.75 13 217721 102160.79 111 .00 373235 191066.21 49 4i* 4N ENTERPRISE 31103 4063 • 75 13 217721 182160.79 04 .00 373235 191066.21 49 IV 8051 TOTAL RECYCLING 71103 4063.75 13 217721. 102160.79 94 .00 373235 191066.21 49 It7i• no TOTAL *WW4W*K . RUST FUND CLEARING 31103 4063.75 13 217721 1192160.79 84 .00 373235 191066.21 49 AA46 066 TOTAL ik5E;(4,(n* REGYCTING TRUST FUND 731103 4063.75 13 217721 102168.79 134 .00 373235 191066.21 49 it9 of San n10 501 OF EAR ,..,.<,,PGFII ACCOUNTING PEkl "'1"7/1996 JNIa 067 FIRE MIFI(3AT1:ON DEFT/DIV 3200 FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY/ ELE OBJ ACCOUNT .rw44444414* CURRENTmm*m*KI* * *3.W >47EAR--TD-DATF*xri4+ea.4 JB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL ):EXP ENCLJMDR. BUDGET BALANCE BDOT ANNUAL- ---ONE:NCUMB-: 30 PUBLIC SAFETY 31 PUBLIC SAFETY 40 CAF`ZTAC OUTLAY 40 45 CAP --MACHINERY 6 EUI.IIPMENT 0 .00 0 0 5593,95 0 5400.00 5400 5593.95- 204 50 ER FUN): Ac11ViTY 50 10 INTER -FUND TRANSFERS OUT 701. 1003.00 599 71.07 1 E03.00 06 .00 3606 1003.00 "50 31 ** K* PU0L..IC SAFETY 301 1.003,00 599 21.07 7396.95 751. 5400.06 9006 3790.95_-14 s:,. PUBLIC SAFETY 301. 1.003.00 599 2107 7396.95 351. 5400.00 9006 3790.95- 142 IV 3[200 TOTAL ;r*er* 44* -- [-I.RE 301 1.503.00 599 2107 7396.95 351 5400. 00 9006 3790.95- 142 EFT 72 TOTAL.. ******ar _.. FIRES AND 1[F'F. SAFETY :301 1E303.00 599 2107 7396.95 351 5400.00 9006 3790.95- 142 UNIJ 067 101AL. ****i****x FIRE MIT:LCGATION - - 301 1003.00 599 2107 7396.95 351. 5400.00 9006 3790.95- 142 f s 6 UM26TL 50% OF YEAR LARSED Ity oF Sa Jacinto ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 IND 073 CAPITALIMPROVEMENT DEPT/DIV I900 DEVELOPER FEES—SE:1400/ 66i 7iCCGUNT 40444******CURRENT00t******** **********YEAR—TO—DATF*** ITIHNIJAL UNEFIEUME. ..113 SUB DESCRIPTIUN BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE 10 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 10 t-r,ii INTER PUNIi ACTIVITY ----- no lo INTER —FUND TRANSFERS OUT 72 430.50 590 504 430.50 05 10 *4 ** 72 130.50 590 504 430.50 05 10 *) ** OENERAL 00VERNMENT 72 430,0 590 504 430.50 05 TV 0900 TOTAL ******* DEVELOPER FEES 72 430.50 59B 504 430.50 05 Err OY TOVAL WAMWifi(4 DEVELOPER FEE!-IiD1400 72 430.50 590 504 430.50 05 UND 073 TOTAL miriokirioArft CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 72 430.50 59M 504 470.50 05 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 BDOT B61 430.50 50 061 430.5O So 061 430.50 50 061 430.50 50 061 430.50 50 061 430.50 50 -QJUKRN; UMY6(1: 50% OF YEAR fAr,Fri Ity of San IND 074 CAR POOL MITIGATION DEPT/DIV 0900 DEVELOPEf. r-EE3—GB1400/ n=ff bid -- AccoUNI . 444644*****KETWMNT********** *****#**i476TARTO-ITATP**1440(*4 ANNUAL UNENC AB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL %EXE ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE FACT ACCOUNTING PERIOD07/1996 2 s ' 10 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 10 7 -SO iNILli FUWAUTN/T7------ a li !fp() 10 INTER -FUND TRANWERS ONT 455 2729.00 600 31E15 2729.00 06 .00 545G 2729.00 50 10 ;i44- it 455 7727.00 600 3105 2729.00 06 .00 5450 2729.00 50 10 fi't ,* GENERAL 00VLRNMENT 455 2729.00 600 3165 2729.00 66 .00 5456 2729.00 50 IV G900 TOTAL **4****f DEVELOPER FEES 455 2729.00 600 31E15 2729.00 06 .00 5458 2729•00 50 Eri 09 TOTAL Aic*i(Ai DEVELOF'ER 1::EE5 ,51,31400 155 22.9.00 600 3105 272900 86 .00 5456 2729.00 50 5 _ UND 074 TOTAL WM******M CAR POOL MITIGATION 455 2729.00 600 3105 2729.00 06 .00 5459 2729.00 50 ‘UUkille ItY of Savi JaLinto tAW.1Jt b.41: LAPSED ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 JND 075 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION 'BEET/DIV 0900 DEVELOPER FEES—SB1400/ ) EL.E OBJ ACCOUNT ******m**CURRENT******.i. iii.i1W.4**KiiVtARITO—DATE*4-i;i(*i;64 ANNUAL UNENCUMB. --k JB SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL Y.EXF ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE LEiGT 10 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 10 40 CAPITAL OUTLAYS 40 01 CAP—IMPROVEMENT/OTHER I597 10450.14 65519164 11179 10450.14 94 .00 0705.06 55 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 :10 INTER -FUND 1RANSFER0 OUT 416 7960.64-1914— 2912 2497.50 116 00705.06 4995 620.36— 224 10 44 ,y(, 2013 2497.50 124 14091 12955.64 92 0705.06 24159 2497.50-90 10 ;4* 3.4• GENERAL GOVERNMENT 2013 2497.50 124 14091 12955.64 92 0705.06 24159 2497.50 90 IV 0900 TOTAL **A**X* DEVELOPER REES 2013 24159 2197,50 124 14091 12955.64 92 0705.R6 2497.50 90 EFT 09 TOTAL *****444 DEVELOPER FEES—SB1400 2013 2497.50 124 1.4091 12955.64 92 0705.06 24159 2497.50 90 UNE) 075 TOTAL iii**At LOCAL TRANSPORTATION 2013 2497.50 124 14091 12955.64 92 0705.86 24159 2497.50 90 :00RAM! GM26.1'- 59% OF YEAR PSE0 Ity or San nto ACCOUNTING PERIM,•-07/1996 JN9 076 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DEPT/DIV 0900 DEVELOPER FEES-SD1400/ EL t 610 ALTUDAT— *********CURRENT*14****ft*** **4****4.yEAR-'TET'un6TE..14 ANNUAL UNLNLUFIII,-77Z JD SUD DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL %EXP BUDGET ACTUAL MEXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET DALANCE BEIGT 10 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 10 40 CAPITAL OUTLAYS e : 74 10 01 CAP-IMPROVEMENT/OTHER 4167 .00 0 29169 27.47- 0 .00 50000 50023.47 0 SO INTER FOND i*-.rfOTY 50 10 INTER -FUND TRANSFERS OUT .69 101 1.50 600 4603 4011.50 0/. .00 0023 1011.50 50 10 44 44 4036 1011.50 113 13(352 3900.073 12 .00 50027 54034;97- 7- 10 tem ee* GENERAL GOVERNMENT _ 4036 4011.50 03 33052 3900.03 12 .00 58023 54034.97 7 TV BY00 TOTAL A*X11(* _ DEVELOPER FEES 4936 401150 83 33052 3900.03 12 .00 50023 54034.97 7 EEF 09 TOTAL 4.49lik4**ff DEVELOPER FEE0-S81400 4976 1011.50 83 33052 3990.03 12 .00 50023 54034.97 7 OND 076 TOTAL REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION 1936 1011.50 03 33052 3900.03 12 .00 59023 54034.97 . 7 MORAN: 1311267L 1v of San JaLInto IND 077 PUBLIC BUILDING ELE IJBJ ACCOUNT JB SUB DESCRIPTION 50X OF YEAR LAPSED DEPT/DIV 0900.DEVELOPER FEES—SB1400/ m********CURRENT*******mmm mo*****mmatYEAR—TO—DATEmmmmm PNUAL UNENLUMD. BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBR. BUDDET BALANCE 10 GENERAL GOVERNMENT CO 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 10 INTER—EOND 1RANSFERS'OUT LA tO 'A* GENERAL GOVERNMENT IV 0900 TOTAL 'A****Hif DEVELOPER FEES IPT 09 TOTAL.34 DEVELOPER EEE3-8111400 JND 077 TOTAL i(ff*H)Cifif*ii PUBLIC BUILDING 53 317.50 599 371 317.50 R6 53 .17.50 599 .et 3I7.5A n6 sz 31/.50 599 371 31(,30 06 53 117.50 599 371 317.50 116 53 317.50 599 371 317.50 86 53 717.50 599 371 317.50 06 () ) , 00 .00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 635 217.50 50 635 317,50 SO 635 317.50 50 .00 635 317.50 50 . 00 .00 635 317.50 50 635 317.50 50 !-! UM267' 54-3% DI- YE: Al.: 119 or Sa - o ACCOUNTIND PERT077/1996 JND 000 CED NU, 2 CAPITAL DEPT/DIV 9100 CAPITAL/ ) EL g OBj ' ACCOUNT *44*-0444***4COMENTiN*416-***** *********iYEAR-70-DATEff****** ANNUAL UNENEUMPT-----X 11) SUD DESCRIPTION BUDOET ACTUAL %EXP BUDGET ' ACTUAL Y.EXF' ENCUMBR. DNDOETBALANCE MGT' 50 EN1ERPRI11E 50 3o PktiFEggiONALita;HNICAL- - :30 90 PROF -OTHER 0 .00 0 0 9.59 0 .00 0 9.59- 0 40 CAPITAL OUTLAYS 40 01 CAP-IMPROVEMENI/OTHER 37003 .00 0 259501 i3J43.05 .00 445000 431056.17 3 50 INTLR FUND ACTIVITY 50 10 IN1ER-rUN0 1RANSFEk3 OUT 625 3750.00 600 4375 3750.00 06 .00 7500 3750.00 50 ' JO w* ik l'Oli 7-;';0 . 00 I 0 24;3956 I 69C)7. ,I;1 6 .00 452500 435596:711 4 '.:;0 ik) ENTERPRISE 37700 3750.00 10 263956 16903.4:? 6 .00 452500 435596,50 4 IV 9100 TOTAL 41.1.itikitAit CAPITAL 37700 3750.00 10 263956 16903.42 6 .00 452500 435596.58 4 EPT 91. TOTAL CAPITAL 37700 350.00 10 263956 16903.42 6 .00 452500 435596,50 4 UND OSO TOTAL t.ttFAX*14**4 CED NO, 2 CAPITAL 37708 3750.00 10 263956 16903.42 6 .00 452500 435596.50 4 GM267L 50% OF YEAR LAPSED tv oF San Jacinto ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 Nil 001 AD 94 - 1 CAPITAL DEPT/DIV 9100 CAPITAL/ i ELF 011.1 ACCOUNT ANAA***N*CURRENT;(********* **********YtAR-TO-DATE***4* ANNUAL GFERCUR 4 lb SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL %EXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BOOT 50 ENTERPRISE JO 30 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL 30 90 PROF-04HER 0 .00 0 ' 0 558.35 0 .00 0 556.35- 0 40 CAPITAL OUTLAYS _ . 40 01 1:AP-IMPROVEMEN1/0THER 290913 .00 0 203686 206194.31 101 174600.33 349105 31609.64- 109 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 10 INTER -FUND TRANSFERS OUT 375 269.40- 72- 2625 2250.00 06 .00 4500 2250.00 50 50 .1,i- m.a 29473 269.40- 206311 209002.66 101 174600.33 353605 29997.99- 10/ :i0 +.). 4., n- ENTEr:PRISIT . _ . 29473 269.40- 1- 206311 209002.66 101 174600.73 353685 29997.99-- 169 LV 9100 TOTAL ****M4R CAPITAL 29473 269.40- 206311 209002.66 101 174600.33 353685 29997.99- 1.09 4-, Jn. 91 TorAL 4414**n+k CAPITAL 29473 • 269.40- 1- .206311 209002.66 101 174680.33 353685 29997.99- 109 MD 0111 TOTAL ai,D.eir***wit AD Y4 - 1. CAF1AAL 29473 269.40- 206311. 209002.66 '101 174680.33 3536/15 29997.99- 109 MORATIT C412604„ 4,- 50N OF YEAR R.APSED A11:COUNTIN8 RERIOD_07/1996 y o1 Bto an J I JND 091 SODOM PROJECT FUND DEFT/DIV 9700 CAPITAL Rp4OJECT/ 1 gILE LA-43 ACUOUNT. A*441444,m*ecumENT*****44,8** idto*-1.01**m4YEAR—TO—DATE4441440.14 ANNUAL 1., , 1--. JE SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDOET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMBR, BUDGET BALANCE BEIGT 70 REBEVELOPMENT 70 30 pRoFEssiuNAL/TMINIEAL 30 90 PROF -OTHER 5333 .00 ' 0 37331. 1530.00 4 .00 64000 62470.00 50 INFER FUND AC1IVIrf SO 10 INTER rum) TRANSFERS OUT 7983 6969479 175 27001 27144.01 97 .00 47799 20654.19 57 70 40E 41-) 9316 6969.79 75 65212 20674401 44 .00 111799 70 1i4i •ot REDEVELOPMENT 9316 6969.79 75 65212 28674.81 44 .00 111799 IV 9700 TOTAL SOUP, RROJECT AREA 9316 6969.79 75 65212 20674401 44 .00 111799 _ . EFT 97 TOTAL **K**** CAPITOL PROJECT 7316 6969.79 75 65212 20674.01 44 .00 11.1799 831244-17 76 83124.19 26 03124.19 26 83124.19 26 UND 09.1. 18TAL 'Aiti4')(144444/-( SOBOBA PROJECT FUND 9316 6969.79 75 65212 28674.01 44 .00 111799 03124.19 26 WORAM: 0M26YL ity ot San Jacinto 59% OF' YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 AND 092 SOBOSA DEBT SERVICE DEPT/DIV 9700 CAPITAL PROJECT/ ELE UBJ ACCOUNT 4444*****CURRENT********** *******14**YEAR-TO-DATP*ma.**** ANNUAL- UNERETTRE. JB SUD DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL Y.EXP ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BEIGT 70 REDEVET.OPMENT i'0 30 , PROEESSIONAL/FECHNICAL 30 90 PROF -OTHER 275 .00 0 1925 .00 0 .00 3300 3300.00 0 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 10 INAER-FUND TRANSFERS OUT 7ri43 .00 0 55601 .00 0 .00 95310 95310.00 0 60 DEBT SERVICE 60 30 ERAF PAYMENT 041 .00 0 5607 .00 0 .00 10087 10007.00 0 70 EASS-THRUMWD 3287 .00 ._ 0 23009 .00 0 .00 39439 39439.00 0 JJO * DEBT SERVICE 4120 .00 0 26E396 .00 0 .60 49526 4926.00 0 70 ** xi. 12346 .00 0 06422 .00 0 .00 146136 118136.00 0 70 *X ** REDEVELOEMENT 12346 .00 0 86422 .00 0 .00 140136 141313600 0 TV 9700 T0TAL******* SODODA PROJECT AREA 12346 .00 0 06422 .00 0 .00 140136 146136.00 0 EF 1 97 TOTAL 41**K**A CAPITAL PROJECT 12346 .00 0 86422 .00 0 .00 1481.36 140136.00 ONO 092 TOTAL ********* SODOBA OEBT SERVICE 17316 .00 0 86422 .00 0 .00 146136 140136.00 0 :UORAti i IiM�re ' 1v u1 ¶.1 n 'aal.1 50/ DE YEAC' P;ED ACCOUNTING FER'U'.'�"" /1996 IND 094 LOW-MOI1/HCIUSINU/80EUEA DEPT/DIV 9700 CAPITAL PROJECT/ i t LF: ODJ Af U6UFff-------- w+Tfi*«w**CURRENT********41. sra**+a** *SEAR-.TO.-DATE.444i4 twlr 1B SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXF' BUDGET ACTUAL XEXF' F..:NCEIMER. DULCET BALANCE BDOT 70 REDEVELOPMENT 70 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 10 INTER -FUND TRANSFERS OUT 76 s4:.' it4f 70 *3 )4x REDEVELOPME IV 9700 TOTAL' 4A x ;{* SOEUBA PROJECT AREA EFT 97 TOTAL +fn-;tu'+x4 C:APITAL.. PROJECT JND 094 TOTAL wx0it1R Mat:tit LOW-MUD/HOUSING/SOPOEA ANNUAL 4322 .00 0 30254 .00 0 .00 51260 51860.00 0 432e .00 0 70254 .0G 0 .00 SLOAO ✓1860 00 4322 .00 0 30254 .00 0 .00 51060 5.1060.00 4322 .00 0 30254 .00 0 .00 51.060 51860.00 4322 .00 0 30254 .00 0 .00 51060 51060.00 0 4322 .00 0 30254 .00 0 .00 5.1860 51860.00 0 :IMAM; 802671 513X OF YEAR LAPSED ty i, F Sap Jacint" ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 1ND096 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT DEPT/DIV 9700 CAPITAL PROJECT/ ELE OBJ ACCOUNT **Am4.1****CURRENT********** ****4*,76tii4itAifbziAIE:x4;6446-i* ciNfluAL U N 1B SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL %EXP BUDGET ACTUAL Y.EXP FNCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE 70 REDEVELOPMENT e0._ ........ ...... . ..._ ___ 10 PERSONNEL SERVICES 10 0.1 3ALARIES-FULL 11ME 1439 .00 0 10073 15306.07 152 .00 17268 1961.93 89 11 Eiiri.briF. iivAEFIrii GT 3 5 11 10 FRINGE BENEFITS 263 .00 0 1041 5617.472 307 .00 3157 15 RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS 99 .00 0 693 1136.69 164 .00 1192 26 WORKERS COMPENSATION ' 23 .00 0 161 37.72 23 .00 272 11 ikK EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 385 .00 0 2695 6022.33 253 .00 4621 21 SUPPLIES 21 10 OFFICE SUPPLIES/POSTAGE SOO 139'(.20 200 3500 6371.62 182 .00 6000 30 PROPESSIONAL/TECONICAL 30 90 PROF -OTHER 7917 .00 0 55419 33129.72 60 24012.36 95000 37057.92 61 31 TRAVEL & MEETING COST 31 15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 42 .00 0 294 300.90 102 .00 500 .1.99.10 60 20 CONE/SEMINARS/WORKSHOPS 033 .00 0 5831 230.01 4 .00 10000 9769.99 31 *m TRAVEL & MEETING COSTS 075 .06 0 cs1.25 530.91 9 .00 10500 , 36 OTHER SERVICES & CHARGES 36 25 ADVERTISING f.266 .00 0 1456 .00 0 .00 2500 40 CAPITAL OUTLAYS 40 01. 3::AP-IMPROVEMENTS/OTHER 73512 662.67 1 514584 45991.7 9 25000.00 002140 2490.92- 179 55.31 95 234.20 TA 2201.33- 148 50 INTER ruND ACTIVITY _ 50 10 INIER FOND IRANSFERS OUT 19047.00 151 09109.(.1 101 .00 151179 0 ** m 97434 21107.03 22 6020311 1971615.12 29 49012.36 1169216 374.62- 106 2500.00 0 011256:2S----ig 62069.20 59 922230!52 21 70 m* AX REDEVELOPMENT 97434 21107.03 22 602030 197165.12 29 49012.36. 1169216 922238.52 21 11V 9700 TOTAL *N**44 00141300 PROJECT AREA 97434 21107.03 22 602030 197165.12 29 19012.36 1169216 'JEPT 97 101AL if,i,444*,444 CAPITAL PROJECT '97434 21107.03 22 602039 197165.12 29 A9912.36 1169216 1UND 096 TOTAL 4i/oot*o4 REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 97434 211.07.03 22 6020313 197165.12 29 49912.36 1169216 922230.52 21 922239.52 ,21 922239.52 23. 9 an.iRAM: UM267(., i lr ul San ,. .....:. �,( 50X OF YEAR, AI'5E[ ACCOUNTING PERIOP-- 07/1996 MD 09'7 REDEVELOPMENT (DEBT SE_RV. DEPT/DIV 9700 CAPITAL FI<OJECT/ ELE ONJ. __. ACOOljJT 4KA*N***mcuRRE_NT>e****1***%******+r%*ixxYEAR..Ta_.FiAT'E*+i***iiJi 1D SUP DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXF BUDGET ACTUAL XEXF' 70 REDEVELOPMENT 70 30 F'ROF'ES8IONAI./TECHNItAE 30 90 PROF -OTHER 70 IV FEPT 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 10 INTER -FUND TRANSFERS OUT 60 DE.BI SERVICE 60 10 BOND RETIREMENT 15 INTEREST F'AYMENI 30 FRAF PAYMENT 70 PASS-1HRU EMU 71 PASS-THRU COUNTY 73 PASS-'LHRU AURE:EM 60 +c4 DEBT SERVICE *4 44 9700 REDEVELOPMENT 2003 43750 3339 7`r81 3942 6055 GENERAL 11147 iris - 333 ' 33197 TOTAL **444*4 L-'OE+OBA PROJECT AREA 9 t TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT UND 097 TOTAL *44*****M REDEVELOPMENT DE'B'I 71b30 79030 79030' 79030 SERV. 79030 .00 0 14581 .00 0 306250 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .60 -0 .00 0 00 23373 53067 27594 4790_5 711029 2331 232379 5030.02 35 .00 55000.00 115010.01 .00 .00 .00 .00 170010.01. !35 7:17 0 0 0 0 73 nr;:3:'!I0 175049.6:3 37 .00 0 553210 .00 0 553210 .00 0 553210 .00 0 553210 175049.63 32 1750,19.63 32 .1.75019463 32 175049.63 32 _ANNUM- IIN ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE BEIOT .00 25000 19969.10 20 .00 525000 525000.00 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 40065 90966 47309 822'57 13 37 63 4000 398360 14935.00- 137 24052.01- 126 47309:00_- 0 B2257.00 0 133763.00 0 __.4000.00 0 220341.19 43 .00 948360 773310:77"-----19_..__... 00 948360 773310.37 19 .00 9111360 773310.37 19 .00 9413360 77331.0.37 19 .00 940360 773310.37 19 a 7070R001 GM261L It,/ of 53,4n Jacinto 581 OF YEAR LAPSED ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 UND 099 LOW -MOD HOUSING S.J. DEPT/DIV 9700 CAPITAL PROJECT/ A ELE ODJ ACCOUNT wit*******CURFXNT******%*** **********YEAR-TO-DATE**A**** ANHUAE---131 UN SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP ENCUMDR. BUDGET BALANCE 70 REDEVELOPMENT 70 10 PERSONNEL SERVICES 10 01 SALARIES -FULL TIME 02 SALARIES - OVERTIME 10 ;- PEW-1014ND. SERVICES •- 655 928.63 142 4585 2459.60 54 .00 7963 5403.32 31 0 8.47 0 0 16.00 0 .00 0 /6.00- 0 655 937.10 143 4t;b'e, 2475.6B 54 .00 7863 F;;307 11 EMPLUYEE 9ENEFITS 11 10 PkIN0E BENEFITS 171. 230.97 134 1211 470.27 39 .00 2081 75 RE1IREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS 07 127.62 147 609 334.04 ss .00 1.040 17 UNIFORMS 0 37.50 0 0 75.00 0 .00 0 20 WORKERS COMPENSATION 23 19.13 03 161 66.25 41 .00 272 11 ,4 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 283 415.22 147 1901 946.36 40 .00 ' 3793 1610.73 --23 705.16 32 75.00- 0 205.75 24 2446.64 28 30 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL 30 90 PROF -OTHER 3750 .00 0 26250 7776.33 30 .00 45000 37223.67 17 31 VEHICAL SERVICES 31 05 CONTACT SERVICES 333 40 CAPITAL 0UTLA'1'S 40 01 CAR-IMPROVEMENTS/OTHER 10 CAP -LAND ACOUISITION 40 ;k3+ CAPITAL OUTLAYS 50 INTER FUND ACTIVITY 50 10 INTER -FUND 1RAN0FERs OUT 410 DENT SERVICE 60 10 BOND RETIREMENT 15 INTEREST PAYMENT 30 ERAF PATMENT 60 it14 DEBT SERVICE 470 170 .)i' REDEVELOPMENT DEPT 9106 TOTAL 4404-0k4H SODUDA PROJECT AREA - - -• • 7 TOTAL WA*4V,W4 cAriTo PRoJEcT FUND 099 TOTAL W*44f44444 LOW-MOU HOUSING S.J. GRAND TOIAL ICAA.AA4 .00 0 2731 .00 0 .00 4000 4000.00 0 118617 19748.05 17 830319 443681.65 53 116950.00 1423400 862760.35 39 • 27917 .00 0 195419 .00 0 .00 335000 335000.00 0 .146534 19740.65 14 1(53(3 44:3601. • 65 43 116950.00 1150400 1197160.35 32 11695 609.00- 6- 011165 02752.00 101 .00 140342 57'390.00 59 4425 .00 0 30975 .00 0 .00 53095 741.9 .00 0 51933 .00 0 .00 89030 1.1.54 .00 0 0070 .00 0 .00 13815 12990 .00 0 90986 .00 0 .00 155970 176240 20411.37 12 1233736 537632.03 44 116950.00 2114968 1460377.98 31. 53095.00 0 99070.00 0 13045.00 0 15-,516:66--- 0 176740 20411.37 :12 1273736 537632.02 41 116958.00 2114968 1460377.98 31 176248 20411.37 12 1233736 537632.02 44 116958.00 2114968 1460377.98 31 176249 20411.37 1.2 1233736 537632.02 44 116958.00 2114968 1460377.98 31. 176240 20411.37 50 1233736 537632.02 57 116950.00 211496D 1460377.98 40 1557161 779191.00 0 10900127 6230739.05 0 1200822.00 10692263 11252701.15 0 APPENDIX D AGENDAS1491996.MYE7 APPENDIX 1VS5'98FISCAL YEAR yN|D'YEARREV|EVV OF BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET FUND SUB -TOTAL FUND DEPT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION REQUEST SUB-TOTALFUNDNAME 10 1110 1002 Overtime for Deputy City Clerk 3.000 10 1110 1110 Fringe benefit adjustments 4.788 10 1110 3405 Contract City Clerk responsibilities 5.800 10 1110 3625 Job advertisements for PD_positions & City Manager 4.000 18 1200 1110 Fringe benefit budget adjustments 11.056 10 1210 1110 Fringe benefit budget adjustments 1,175 10 1700 1110 Fringe benefit budget adjustments 15.858 10 2500 3090 Ergonomic supplies aspart ofinjury prevention 2.500 18 2500 3090 Computer sydemupgrades 5.450 10 2500 3120 Chamber o[Commerce membership investment 50 10 3210 1110 Fringe benefit budget adjustments 5.402 10 7400 3514 Utilities costs 4.000 64,071 GENERAL FUND 21 4150 3090 Computer System Upgrades 'Allocation 2.725 22 4150 3080 Computer System Upgrades 'Allocation 2.725 25 7180 3405 Computer System Upgrades Allocation 2.725 50 9000 3090 Computer System Upgrades 'Allocation 2.725 50 QOOO 3330 Additional costs ofchlorine for wells 27.545 55 4170 3090 Computer System Upgrades Allocation 2.725 66 8051 3090 Computer System Upgrades /x|nvaVon 2.725 92 0700 3090 Computer System Upgrades Allocation 2.725 98 9700 3090 Computer System Upgoades Allocation 2.725 98 9700 3405 Contract with C0C||edey Knox 16.000 65,345 OTHER FUNDS TOTAL NET EXPENDITURE ADJUSTMENTS 129/016 129,416 ALL FUNDS APPENDIX E . AGENDAS 1031 TOTAL FUND BALANCE ESTIMATED FUND 71 +95 REVENUE General (0101 5 293.952 $ 3505,549 title NIB Grant (011) s 7,006 '2forkersCGmP (C19: 5 (340,441) , - Elulp. Raelacement (019i 5 1'26,852) LLab(L17 insurance (020) 5 1808,41 E) Gas fas (0211 5 ' 32.024 , 440,063 Measure A 1022) 5 466,27E S 571.552 Tratbc Safety (0241 5 1,579 5 17,485 L_MD (0251 5 (56,1441 , 664.190 ✓arks ()oval. (0231 ' 60,061 S 58.305 COBS 10291 5 - 599,946 Pkwy. Dove(, (0321 5 223,550 S 19.305 CFD 51 Public Salary (0351 (35,3241 5 12.259 CFD a2 Public Safety 1036) 10.431 _ 47,349 CFD R3 Public Safety (037t (17,3551 1 91,239 Underground 05:4:0s (0381 236 786 5 10.660 Flood Control (039) 1,256.403 , 72,435 Trathc Signal. i0411 523.873 1 217.700 AC87.1 Debt 500 10421 (549,992) 5 30,000 AC94-1 Debt Svc. (043) 145,991 s 92,321 CFD 51 Dell Svc (044( S CFD 82 Deal Svc. 1046( 3.073.650 1 2.242,704 Water (0501 (34,083) s 1,188.533 Water Cap(ta1 (0511 369,588 $ 2,800 Sewer (0551 152,230 5 218.133 Asset Fdrferture (06, ( :85.594` 5 60,000 1 2% Sa-es Tau (062( ;5.772) 5 62,000 AQMD 1063) 66.068 5 28,435 75090103 Trust 10681 57.803 5 380.000 Fre Mr(gauon 10671 54.227 <_ 36.677 •481600 Cae, (mprov, (073-077/ 399,187 5 49,239 CFO n"1 Leeds( (080) 1,140,361 15,500 A034-I Capita; (081: 267,644 3,500 Umhed Trust [0891 703.632 > SU6-TOTAL CITY FUNDS RDA Sobdoa Pro(ec1 (091( RDA Sobdbe Debt Svc 1092) RDA Sobobe Lo-Mod ;0941 RDA S. J. Prolec11096) RDA S. J. Debt Svc (097) ROA 5. J. Lo-Mod (0991 SUBTOTAL RDA FUNDS GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS CITY OF SAN JACINTO EONS BALANCE ANALYSIS MID YEAR REVIEW 7SCAL YEAR 1995.96 MID YEAR TRANSFERS REVENUE 10 ADJUSTMENTS (OUTI 59.227) 5 1,516,791 5 '15,973 1485,136E (17,3501 5 (15.0641 $ (44,1701 5 (13,8481 $ (10,794( 48,8231 (41,7691 5 (85,51') 5 111,9481 5 119,0001 (32,8581 11,5001 (33,7351 (150,4081 (91,364 (60,200 (25.000 52.796 3,606 :19,972 7,500 4,500 300.000 TOTAL MID YEAR TOTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSE REVISED ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE ADJUSTMENTS FUND BALANCE EXPENSES 6/30/36 03)19/36 06/30/96 5,071,387 7,006 149,152 215,973 115,000 745,000 606,878 ' 30.000 599.946 700,000 3,436 5,580 5.728 72,000 240,000 15.000 77,510 244,905 5 64,071 53,710 (106,8521 (703,4181 (23.049( 275,49C - (43,012) - 74,518 32,261 (35,3241 10,431 (17,356f 235.500 1,237,338 468,715 (534,9921 159.302 225,008 3.057,611 944,818 59,224 5 220.000 2 152,388 76,065 202,384 5 :P5,594f 76.545 (317) 69.503 328,542 5 56,465 5 57,298 50,000 5 378.454 445.00(5 5 703.381 175,00(5 5 91.844 s 1,003,892 2.725 2.725 2,725 180,834 53,710 106.852) (708,418) (30,774) 272,765 (45,737) 74,518 32,061 135 3241 10,431 (17,3551 235,500 1.237.838 468,715 (534.992( 159.302 9 3,057,611 30,270 0 28,954 152.338 2,725 200.259 185.5941 (317) 69.503 2,725 s 53.740 87.298 3 378,454 3 703,381 91,844 3 1,003.892 7 895.325 5 ' 0.764.935 (58,2271 692,112 12. 800.574 5 7,035,601 107.966 5 6,987,635 26.775 s 2,500 289.209 5 200,518 4,520 s 47,040 662,165 s 130,000 530,968 5 1.197,372 1. 334,199 _ (351.65E "A91600 Cap(lai Improvement Fund De Capual improvement (073) '0 Tee Pool Mmgabon (0741 5 ocel Tnn0po [ (ion 1075 Remonat Tr. [a1.o1('d761 3 _bl¢ Budd 5 (0771 Tf3TAL CAP. IMP FUND 41,189 5 64.000 5 5.464 5 6.464 (95,3101 5 52.826 5 341,689 $ 2.725 5 338,964 151.8601 5 - 8 - 5 61,251 , 1,050.016 5 3.400 5 2.725 675 :525.000) 423,360 $ 779.980 5 779,980 f122.382) 1.963,370 5 10(5,305 5 16.000 84,305 8.136 5 2.428,306 10,943,961 513.194,321 5 (58,2277 17 430 5 536 '36 769 f 35,299 'C0.447 f d821 1 51 437 7 748 '1 104 ;,, 699.187 -9.239 692.112) 8 3,553,572 5 1.231,938 21,450 5 1.210,388 8611 5 t5,458) 5 a 995) 5.0231 6361 6,354,146 5 8,327,439 5 129,416 5 8,198,023 5 17,405 5 17,405 138,610 5 138.610 +00,273 5 C0,2/3 50.000 (11.162 $ 11' 162 - (1.004 5 1 '.004 ' 3.972( 5 90 000 279.454 1 378.454 „ AGENDAS\031996.MYH) APPENDIX F 10 APPENDIX F Add/Deduct for Liability Insurance Operating Transfer Add/Deduct for Unfunded Worker's Comp Expenses Sub -Total With Insurance Cost Adjustments CITY OF sAN JACINTO MID YEAR BUDGET REVIEW 1995-96 FISCAL YEAR RECONCILIATION OF CI, TO ADOPTED BUDGET TOTAL EXPENDITURES TOTAI, EXPENDITURES PER ADOPTED PER DETAIL 1995-96 BUDGET BUDGET REPORT 4,895,364 5,133,786 87,096 (87,096) 98,729 (98,729) 5,081,189 4,947,961 Add/Deduct Budget Increase: Agenda Item 5.11 on 11i21/95 7,518 (7,518) Add/Deduct Budget Increase: Agenda Item 7.4 on 11/21/95 825 (8251 Add/Deduct Budget Increase: Agenda lien) 5.7 on 11/21/95 17,000 (17,000) Add/Deduct Budget Increase: Agenda Bern 7.3 on 12/19/95 27,250 (27,250) Add; Deduct Budget Rounding Differences 4 (4) RECONCILIATION OF DETAIL BUDGET REPORT TO ADOPTED BUDGET Notes: 5,133,786 4,895,364 (1) The total budgeted General Fund expenditures in the. General Ledger is found on page 21 of the January Detail Budget Report. (2) The total budgeted General Fund expenditures in the adopted budget is found on page 31 of the 1995-96 Final Budget document, (3) The above totals are only for the General Fund. Page 1 ..AGENDAS\031996. APPENDIX G 11 19 9 6 - 97 BUDGET CALE February 6, 1996 February 14, 1996 AR BUDGET MEETING -COUNCIL COMMITTEE: City Manager and Finance Director will meet with Council Budget Committee to review obiectives for the 1995-96 mid -year budget review and the 1996-97 budget. BUDGET MEETING -DEPARTMENT HEADS: All personnel involved in the budget process should attend. Budget diskette on Excel and instructions tc be released for entry by all departments. City will run oarallei budgets on Excel and HTE for 1996-97 while the HTE 3udget program is being tested. March 13, 1996 Goals & Objectives: Departments to submit to City Manager status of current goals (1995-96) and upcoming goals (199G-97). March 19, 1996 MID -YEAR BUDGET REVIEW: Status on expenditure and revenue estimates and revised 06/30/96 fund balance projections March 20, 1996 Internal Service budgets due. Finance will enter. March 20, 1996 Departments to meet to review and discuss internal service allocations. After staff meeting, rates and allocation methods discussed, and personnel detail to be distributed. Department Review of Vehicle Replacements: All departments to submit requirements for upcoming year. MEMOS95‘BUDCAL95 97bl March 20, 1996 ALL BUDGETS DUE: Base budgets, personnel detail and supplemental items. March 27, 1996 April 1, 1996 April 2, 1996 April 3, 1996 April 4, 1996 April 10, 1996 April 17, 1996 April 24, 1996 M EMO595kBUDCAL96. 97hj Preliminary Budget Distribution: At department head meeting, preliminary budgets with information from departments to be released to departments. BUDGET REVIEW (City Manager, Finance & Council Budget Committee): Police Fire BUDGET REVIEW (City Manager, Finance & Council Budget Committee): Water, Sewer Public Works Maintenance, I&MD BUDGET REVIEW (City Manager, Finance & Council Budget Committee): Community Development Redevelopment BUDGET REVIEW (City Manager, Finance & Council Budget Committee): Administration, Finance City Clerk, City Treasurer, All Others BUDGET REVIEW (City Manager & Department Heads): Eudget strategy meeting with department heads after staff meeting on she 1996-97 budget. Final comments from departments to City Manger & Finance to include in budget revisions. Revised Preliminary Budgets to Department Heads: Review for last changes before budget is provided to the Council Budget Committee. Preliminary Budget to Council: Council Budget Committee to meet with department heads. 2 May 21, 1996 June 25, 1996 COUNCIL BUDGET HEARINGS BEGIN COUNCIL BUDGET ADOPTION '1EMGS9.';‘1311DCAL 96 97bl 3 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk DATE: March 19, 1996 SUBJECT: Minutes of Special Meeting of March 2, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of March 2, 1996, as presented. MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY MARCH 2, 1996 1.0 CALL TO ORDER The Special Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 9:00 A.M. by Mayor Conner at the Community Development Offices, 201 E. Main Street, San Jacinto, California. Present: Councilmembers Cornett, Smedley, Solorio, Williams, and Mayor Conner Absent: None 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None 3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS None 4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY None 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY None 6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS None 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS None 8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS None At the hour of 9:01A.M. convened in a closed session, with all members present, pursuant to the following: 9.0 CLOSED SESSION 9.1 Public Employee Appointment pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 Title: City Manager At the hour of 11:00 A.M. reconvened in an open session, with all members present, and announced that no reportable action was taken. 10.0 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned. The hour of adjournment was 11:01A.M. Submitted by Pamela L. Lee, City Clerk Deputy City Glerk 2 Approved by Jim Conner, Mayor STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk DATE: March 19, 1996 SUBJECT: Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 5, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 5, 1996, as presented. MINUTES SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY MARCH 5, 1996 1 0 CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 6:08 P.M. by Mayor Pro Tem Smedley in the Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto. California. Present: Councilmembers Cornett, Solorio, Williams and Mayor Pro Tem Smedley Absent: Mayor Conner Prayer of Invocation by Pastor Freymann Valdez The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Karima Camacho, Sixth Grade Monte Vista school student. 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS Special acknowledgment to City Manager Pamela S. Easter by Mayor Pro Tem Smedley, Councilmember Solorio, and Bob Duistermars on behalf of the Chamber of Commerce. 2.1 Presentation of Flags from San Jacinto Rotary Agit Singh, President, presented three American Flags for Hofmann Park and City Hall, along with a certificate of originality from Congressman Bono. Mayor Pro Tem Smedley then proceeded to public comments. 3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS Larry Reinhart, Representing AQMD, provided an update on the current legislation and handed out brochures to the Council on their various policies and programs. Advised they were a partner in business and provided community support for economic growth. They were working to provide cost effective clean air technology. They were seeking legislation to simplify the application process for smog plans and more flexible rules for ride share. March 5, 1996 In response to Council inquiry, did not know what the future of legislation would be, but they were the only messenger for state and federal legislation and it was up to them to implement, which at times was displeasing with burdensome regulations. Adjustment were being made, but if AQMD were abolished the ramifications would be severe and would jeopardize state transportation and the ability to conform to federal regulations. However, the new Board had demonstrated interest in working to reform itself. Mayor Pro Tem Smedley returned to item 2.2 of the agenda. 2.2 Public Safety Citizens' Committee Update Bob Duistermars, Committee Chair made a presentation providing an update on the progress of the committee. Noted they had discussed funding through grants. The last meeting had been postponed due to a lack of quorum. They would be meeting the following week to discuss the animal control issue and expected to bring a recommendation to Council in April. Mayor Pro Tem Smedley noted that a status report on animal control was on the agenda later in the meeting, by Police Chief Holmes. Councilmember Cornett pointed out some issues were raised by County Fire Chief, for which 120 day noticing would be required and inquired if those were issues which the committee could begin bringing forward in order to allow the Council to better deal with the budget issues. Mr. Duistermars advised the committee had not voted yet, but would attempt to obtain a consensus at the next meeting and bring the matter forward. 2.3 Special Presentation - Chamber of Commerce Mr. Duistermars advised all present, at the recess, there was cake and punch in honor of Ms. Easter's service to the City. At the hour of 6:30 P.M. adjourned the Redevelopment Agency in joint session with the City Council for consideration of the following: 2 March 5, 1996 4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 4.1 Approval of Subordination Agreement with Fun Properties A MOTION was made by Agency Member Williams, seconded by Agency Member Cornett, acting in their capacity as the Redevelopment Agency, to determine Subordination of Agency loan would not unduly and substantially adversely affect Agency's remaining interests in the site; authorized execution of Subordination Agreement and the amount of the bank loan in an amount reasonable required to complete the project. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Mayor Conner absent. At the hour of 6:31 P.M. adjourned the Redevelopment Agency and continued acting in their capacity as the City Council for the remainder of the agenda. 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY A MOTION was made by Councilmember Cornett, seconded by Councilmember Solorio to approve the consent calendar as presented, with the exception of item 5.2, which was pulled for closed session discussion, and item 5.7, which was pulled for separate discussion. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Mayor Conner absent. 5.1 Warrant Register Approved warrant numbers 42466 through 42558 dated February 29, 1996 in the amount of $506,474.07 and Payroll check numbers 6882 through 6951 dated February 2, 1996. 5.2 Claim - Canaday Homes Councilmember Smedley requested the matter be pulled for discussion in closed session. 5.3 Notice of Completion - Warren Road Rehabilitation Project Accepted the Warren Road Improvements installed by Sully -Miller Contracting Company; authorize an increase in contract amount to $664,295.33 to be funded from Account No. 22-4150-410-4001. Councilmember Cornett pointed out there were approximately $80,000 in funds remaining for the project and questioned where the funds could be used? City Manager Easter advised the funds were Measure A and they would be carried over to future projects in coming years. 3 March 5, 1996 Mayor Pro Tem Smedley inquired if the funds could be used for the Expressway widening for the left turn lane? City Manager Easter indicated that could be a potential source of funding, that staff would probably look at funding with Measure A or Gas Tax. Councilmember Cornett suggested that Council look at using the funds for road maintenance plans. Councilmember Solorio suggested that Council be cautious of road maintenance in areas where infrastructure needed to be redone, and avoid the costly mistake of doing the work twice. Mayor Pro Tem Smedley suggested one priority was Warren Road, and also the need to establish a priority list of projects. City Manager Easter suggested, if Council wished, at the next meeting they could establish a program of priorities for the next year budget and direct staff at that time how to spend the remaining funds. 5.4 Notice of Completion - La Entrada Improvement Project Accepted the La Entrada improvements installed by Vance Corporation; approved change orders of $2,676.37 and a final project cost of $93,872.67 to be charged to Account No. 096-9700-470-4001. Councilmember Cornett voiced concern that the final amount was almost $10,000 over the original bid. Noted it was her understanding that it had nothing to do with underbidding, rather, there was an under estimate on the asphalt and cement on the original specifications by Cozad & Thomsen. This was not the first time for this type of error, and she was not happy about it. Would like an explanation and assurance that it would not happen again. City Manager Easter explained that there were two ways of bidding projects, one was on the total project and the other based on material quantities. If the quantities changed, they were still based on the unit prices quoted. In this particular case, the engineer used the Stater Bros. Plans from when they built their portion of the roadway. Those plans were modified and used to develop the specifications. In this case the quantities were higher than anticipated. If Council wished to discuss the matter further and how to mitigate staff would be happy to do that. March 5, 1996 Councilmember Cornett wanted the matter brought to the attention of Council and would like to minimize change orders so they were not so extensive. She would be happy to have a discussion in more detail. Mayor Pro Tem Smedley felt Ms. Cornett had brought up a good point. He was familiar with state laws and no one liked to see padding in bidding, which this was not, but there were so many things that could compromise a legitimate bid, including a successful bidder using several subcontractors. 5.5 Notice of Completion - Community Center Renovation Project Accepted the Community Center Renovation improvements installed by Rose Construction, Approved Change Order No. 1 for $750.00. 5.6 Donation of Vehicle by Bureau of Narcotics Enforcement Accepted the donation as payment for financial services to be performed for the INCA and ARCNET narcotics task forces. Finance Director Herrera indicated the donation was in lieu of keeping books for the agency, amounting to about $8,000. Staff expecting, and requesting, authorization to receive funds in trust next week and begin issuing checks. Councilmember Cornett understood that a car was being donated for use by the Finance Department. Inquired what the staffing situation of the department was, which was already impacted, and would this involve overtime? Mr. Herrera estimated there would be 35 checks annually and 20 receipts. There would be no staff overtime and anticipated charging $4-5,000 for administrative services. The nature of the funds could not change, but they could barter. The barter involved the provision of a pool car for a couple years service. 5.7 Agreement to Defer On -site Improvements Location: 1350 S. San Jacinto St. Applicant: All City Tire (Business Owner) and San Jacinto Investors (Property Owner) Councilmember Williams pulled from Consent Calendar for separate discussion and action. 5 March 5, 1996 ITEM PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR: 5.7 Agreement to Defer On -site Improvements Location: 1350 S. San Jacinto St. Applicant: All City Tire (Business Owner) and San Jacinto Investors (Property Owner) Councilmember Williams voiced concern that approval of this represented a similarity to the matter involved in the nursery litigation and would like the City Attorney to review and clarify. City Attorney Cox advised that the City did not have jurisdiction on the nursery matter, that it was a CALTRANS liability. However, in this particular case, the City would be deferring improvements and some one could always make the argument, although minimal, it was possible. Councilmember Williams inquired if anybody representing the applicant was present to discuss the matter? Al Bubee, a shareholder in the San Jacinto Investors, stated that if anyone had looked at the property in the last four years they would see how they had cleaned it up and made improvements. He did not see it as any more of a liability to the City with the hazards gone. Fred Salazar, Business Owner, indicated he had already spent a great deal on the improvements. Noted all they wanted to do was relocate an existing business and reopen. They also wanted to complete the improvements but would need twelve months to do so and they were only asking for an extension for the asphalt. Mayor Pro Tem Smedley was not aware of any litigation over gravel parking, although there was the potential minimal risk. However, felt the City should work with a revenue generating business in the community and not deny a license just because there might be a lawsuit. Councilmember Cornett inquired if the owner could name the City as additional insured for the first $125,000, for their self insured portion? Fred Salazar indicated they had a million dollar liability policy and he had no problem adding the City as additional insured. Councilmember Williams inquired what the plan was for the ons te lighting and landscaping? 6 March 5, 1996 Fred Salazar indicated the lighting was complete and they were waiting for Planning to approve the landscaping plans, it was only the deferral of asphalt for two years. At the request of Councilmember Cornett, Fire Marshall Wilson indicated that in the past the property in question required numerous notices for clean up and the City had incurred the clean up costs, which had now been cleaned up by the applicant. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Cornett, seconded by Councilmember Solorio, to approve an agreement with the All City Tire and San Jacinto Investors to allow the on -site improvements to be deferred for one year, with the condition that the City be named additional insured, and such condition be removed when all the conditions were met. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Mayor Conner absent. 6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS None 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 7.1 Appointments of Agricultural Advisory Committee Members A MOTION was made by Councilmember Williams, seconded by Councilmember Cornett, to appoint Art Oostdam, Randy Record and John Demler to the Agricultural Advisory Committee and direct staff to work with the Farm Bureau to seek additional persons to fill the committee. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Mayor Conner absent. 7.2 Annexation 66 Policy Mayor Pro Tem Smedley felt this was a matter which should go through the public hearing process and allow land owners to comment. He would like to pursue a consensus from the affected parcel owners. Would also like to consider a reduction in the rates. Would like the matter tabled for a public hearing and for staff to see if the old committee still existed. Councilmember Cornett was uncertain of the process that would need to be followed and if the resolution previously adopted could be changed. City Attorney Cox advised if the intent of Council was only to create a shortened grace period payment, it could be done by minute action. 7 March 5, 1996 Councilmember Cornett voiced concern if the action would force refunds to those who paid in full at the start. Felt more information was needed. Mayor Pro Tem Smedley suggested the option might be to re -address the resolution and allow the landowners to voice their objection to the compounding of interest at six percent annually, or let them pay interest only until the property were sold, but there may be some problems created for new buyers. Suggested perhaps an acceleration clause if the property were sold, making the amounts due and payable, and finally, establishing an ordinance instead of a resolution to give the full force and affect of law. Councilmember Williams voiced concern that there was a desire to table the matter, but the matter continued to be discussed. Suggested tabling until Mayor Conner was present for his input would be the better course of action. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Cornett, seconded by Councilmember Williams to continue the matter to the next meeting. City Manager Easter advised that staff could review options for a public hearing and address the issues. Councilmember Solorio suggested the matter was simple enough. Staff could notify the affected property owners the matter was continued to the next meeting and Council could accept their comments without a formal hearing. City Manager Easter advised staff could communicate with the property owners for a discussion on March 19th, if that was the Council Consensus? Councilmember Cornett felt it needed to be more than just those affected, and should also include those who already paid. City Manager Easter stated staff could follow up with all property owners of record, and those who participated on the committee. Motion was voted on and carried on a 4-0 vote with Mayor Conner absent. 7 3 Continuation of Adoption of Mid -year Budget (from mtg. 2/20/96) City Manager Easter advised there was a request to postpone the matter to the meeting of March 19th. 8 March 5, 1996 A MOTION was made by Councilmember Cornett, seconded by Councilmember Solorio to continue the matter to the meeting of March 19, 1996. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Mayor Conner absent. 7.4 Status Report on Animal Control Police Chief Holmes requested that Council approve the animal control officer being reassigned and a temporary be hired on an hourly basis until there was a recommendation from the Public Safety Financing Committee. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Cornett, seconded by Councilmember Solorio, to approve the staff recommendation. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Mayor Conner absent. City Manager advised Council that Valley Wide could meet at 5:00 P.M. on March 19, 1996, to discuss the contracts for the pool and field use, park maintenance, LLMD maintenance, and generally the park business. Mayor Pro Tem Smedley felt that was insufficient time for the issues and suggested a special meeting on March 26, 1996. City Manager Easter indicated that was the only time they had available and the pressing issue of the ball field use. Councilmember Williams felt the issues were appropriate to touch on and suggested a subcommittee be appointed to further discuss matters for a future meeting. Councilmember Cornett suggested the issues were relative to budget strategy and a meeting was needed for negotiating, maybe they could meet earlier. 8 0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS 8 1 Update on Museum Meeting (from mtg. 2/20/96) Mayor Pro Tem Smedley indicated that the Museum Board did not want a member of the Council on the board, for fear there would be a conflict when they came to Council on issues. Suggested input was needed from the Association. 9 March 5, 1996 Councilmember Cornett noted the association and board were different entities and the board was desperate for direction from the Council, but there was no board. Where should Council go from here? What happened to discussion of the association sitting as the board? Mayor Pro Tem Smedley felt the association could address the Council if they wanted to. Whatever happened, a liaison was needed. Councilmember Cornett noted there was no board presently. City Attorney Cox reiterated his memo of months ago and the options offered. Based on the funding, a separate City Board was mandatory and the current was not functioning. Council needed to first appoint a board, and if the Association was not interested, Council could serve in the dual role. Councilmember Cornett inquired who was the City Council representative? Mayor Pro Tem Smedley indicated he was, and did not see how the City could improve the association management by being more formal than they already were. Councilmember Cornett suggested the alternatives be presented to the association and their recommendation be brought back to Council. Mayor Pro Tem Smedley indicated he would be away during the next meeting. Councilmember Cornett requested the Mayor be asked to send a letter with the options and request the input and then bring the matter back for Council action on the agenda. City Manager Easter suggested that the City Attorney author the letter. City Attorney Cox also suggested the option of turning the assets over to a private organization. 8.2 Selection of Refuse/Franchise Council Sub -Committee It was previously suggested the Council have an ad hoc subcommittee to work on the contract issues. Councilmember Cornett suggested that the same two from the City -to -City 10 March 5, 1996 Recycling serve since there would be a duplication of issues. Mayor Pro Tem Smedley appointed an Ad Hoc Refuse/Franchise Subcommittee consisting of Councilmembers Cornett and Solorio, by consensus of the Council. 8.3 Recycling Sub -Committee Status Report Councilmember Cornett advised they had met with the Hemet Subcommittee but did not cover the issues. The subcommittee would like to first discuss the issues with the full Council to obtain a consensus and then meet to represent that consensus and not just come back to the full Council with information and action. City Manager Easter advised that another item discussed by the Subcommittee was the need to complete SRRE and compliance reports. With the elimination of the Assistant to the City Manager position, Council needed to decide how they wished to see those reports completed. The funds were allocated for report completion and the subcommittee would like to send out an RFP for a person or agency to complete. Councilmember Williams inquired if the Hemet staff was in a position to do the reports and what was the cost? City Manager Easter felt there were two potential responders, Hemet and WRCOG, and City staff could prepare an outline of what services needed to be completed and send out an RFP and have them quote a cost. In response to Council inquiry, there was $5,000 as a budgeted line item for that purpose, so the City needed to be competitive. COUNCIL CONSENSUS to direct staff as suggested above by the City Manager, and send out an RFP for completion of the reports. 8.4 Status Report on Senior Committee Mayor Pro Tem Smedley advised he had spoke with the Seniors and it appeared they would probably form their own informal committee to be recognized by the Council. By forming a committee in that manner they would not be required to meet all the state mandates for city citizen committees. 8.5 Status Report from Council Ad -hoc Budget Committee on 1996-97 Budget 11 March 5, 1996 Councilmember Cornett stated they wished this to be a standing item on the agenda. They had met with staff regarding the guidelines and to determine where they were headed. Mainly they had been working on items noted by the Auditor and issues related to workmen's compensation, liabilities, depreciation and funding capital projects. Some items would affect the budget, but some were long term and could not be accomplished in one year. They would be meeting again and moving forward. Mayor Pro Tem Smedley inquired of the status of the letter to FPPC regarding the previous conflict of interest ruling. City Attorney Cox advised a letter had been prepared, and assumed it had been sent. Mayor Pro Tem Smedley felt there was some confusion on the ruling and wanted an opinion from FP PC as suggested by the City Attorney. The issue was the same three people addressing all issues related to the CFD, and his feeling that each issue should require drawing lots. Through his discussions with the FPPC, they indicated they did not care which way it was done. City Attorney Cox advised he felt that all actions pertaining to the litigation should be considered by the same three individuals, not all matters related to the CFD. Mayor Pro Tem Smedley was satisfied with the explanation, and if there were issues later, a letter could be sent. COUNCIL CONSENSUS that a letter to the FPPC was not necessary at the present time. At the hour of 7:35 P.M. Council recessed. At the hour of 7:55 P.M. Council reconvened in session, with all members present except Mayor Conner, for a closed session pursuant to the following: 9.0 CLOSED SESSION 9.1 Public Employee Appointment pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 Title: City Manager 9.2 Item 5.2 From Consent Calendar - Claim - Canaday Homes At the hour of 8:58 P.M. Council reconvened in open session with all members present, except Mayor Conner, and announced the following: 12 March 5, 1996 9.2 Item 5.2 From Consent Calendar - Claim - Canaday Homes Claim was rejected as presented and recommended by the Claims Adjustor, pursuant to Government Code Section 913 on a 4-0 vote with Mayor Conner absent. 9.1 Public Employee Appointment pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 Title: City Manager Matter was continued for discussion on March 7, 1996, at 4:00 P.M. 10 0 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned to March 7, 1996, at 4:00 P.M., in the Community Center, for continued discussion of item 9.1 on the agenda. The hour of adjournment being 8:59 P.M. Approved by Submitted by Jim Conner, Mayor Pamela L. Lee, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk 13 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk DATE: March 19, 1996 SUBJECT: Minutes of Special Meeting of March 7, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of March 7, 1996, as presented. MINUTES ADJOURNED MEETING SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY MARCH 7, 1996 1.0 CALL TO ORDER The Adjourned Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 4:10 P.M. by Mayor Conner at the Community Development Offices, 201 E. Main Street, San Jacinto, California. Present: Councilmembers Cornett, Smedley, Solorio, Williams, and Mayor Conner Absent: None 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None 3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS None 4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY None 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCILJREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY None 6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS None 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS None 8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS None At the hour of 4:11 P.M. convened in a closed session, with all members present, pursuant to the following: 9.0 CLOSED SESSION 9.1 Public Employee Appointment pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 Title: City Manager At the hour of 5:10 P.M. reconvened in an open session, with all members present, and announced the following action on a 3-2 vote, with Councilmembers Cornett and Smedley dissenting: Appointed Lyle Alberg as Interim City Manager subject to a contract approval to be brought forward to the full Council. 10.0 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned. The hour of adjournment was 5:11 P.M. Submitted by Pamela L. Lee, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk 2 Approved by Jim Conner, Mayor 5 �9 STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John Herrera -Finance Director Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager SUBJECT: Approval of Register of Audited Demands and Payroll Checks DATE: March 05, 1996 RECOMMENDATION Approve warrant numbers 42559 through 42649 dated March 15, '1996 in the amount, of S938,229.61 and Payroll check numbers 6952 through 7021 dated February 16 , 1996. SUMMARY \ listing of accounts payable warrants is attached for your review and approval. Payroll information s ava table for your review in the Finance Department. PRERARED03/14/1996. 11:03206 PROGRAM: GM3131.1 City of San Jacinto ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST PAGE REPORT NUMBER 1 21 ' GROUP NUMBER 00269 PrePaida: ACCOUNTING PER OD: .09/1996 t3 TRANS' TRANS DATE VOUCHER Bi ACCOUNT NUMBER Mo.) P.0, VENDOR VENDOR NAME 100 02/29/1996 003261 00 800-0000-101:20-00 NET PAYROLL ,"200 02/29/1996 003282 AbitNI0ftDEDUCTIONS 300 02/29/1996 e PERS MEMBERSHIP 1.AO 02/29/1996 COMP 500 02/29/1996 003285 4pEFERRED COMP NVOICE NUMBER NEck DATE T'rr L4T TRANS 0000235 CITY OF SAN JACINTO 00/00/0000 0042559 02/29/1996 N REO 2u221-41- 0000869 RIVERSIDE CO. EMPLOYEES STMT .00/0000 0042560 02/29/1996 003263 00 085-0000-202.21-26 CONTRIBUTIONS • 003264.00,0850000202421"29 CONTRIBUTIONS - 0000630 PERS 00/00/0000. 0042561 02/29/1996 0000691 LINCOLN NATIONAL 0/0000 0042562 02/29/1996 STMT N STMT 00 085-0000-202.21-29 0000607 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST STMT CONTRIBUTIONS 00/00/0000 0042563 03/01/1996 6 02/29/1994 0032E16 00 005-0000-202•21-046 0000419 STANDARD INS. COMPANY STMT 1.,LIPE4INSURANCE PREMIUM FEBRUARY 1996' - 0000 0042564 02/29/1996 9 .„ 700 02/29/1.996 003287 00 085-0000-202.21-47 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM FEBRUARY 1996 1300: 02/29/1.996 00328 14 900 02/29/1996 003269 ENTAL CARE PREMIUM ±7100 02/29/1996 003290 '4_RENTA4_CARE PREMIUM 30 1100 02/29/1996 003291 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN 3 903;•94/1996 003292 00•005-0000202.21-52 FEBRUARY 1996 00 085-0000-202.21-31 FEBRUARY 1996 00 085-0o00-202.21-32 FEBRUARY 1996 0000419 STANDARD INS. COMPANY 00/00/0000 0042564 02/29/1.996 N STMT 0000419 STANDARD INS. COMPANY STMT 00/00/0000 0042564 02/29/1996 0000279 DENTI CARE OF CALIFORNIA STMT 00/00/0000 0042565 02/29/1996 -N 0000279 DENTI CARE OF CALIFORNIA STMT 0/00/0000 0042565 02/29/1996 00 010-1400-414.34-05 00 096-9700470.40-01 ' 'OE_r_UHDS FOE_EUN PROPERTIES LLc' VI 1300 03/04/1996 003293 00 025-0000-303.06-55 REFUND OF LLMD FEES .1400 03/06/1996 003294 '__BEPLENIOR_ROSTAK_ME1ER___ 1500 03/08/1996 003295 ;.1.._REELE141,517L. 7:1 • 0001069 RAY BOUZA STMT 00/00/0000 0042566 03/01/1996 43001958 VALLEY MERCHANTS BANK STMT *-4040001/0000 '0042547 03/04/1996 0001515 DART L.EON, INC. REO 00/00/0000 0042568 03/04/1996 00 094-9700-470.21-10 - • 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER 00/00/0000 0042569 03/08/1996 69,629.00 6,565.83 • 1,040.00 478.56 472.99 937.50 3,163.02 N REO 00 010-1700-417.21-10 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER REO 00/00/0000 0042569 03/08/1996 69.99 GROUP TOTALS • VENDOR VENDOR NAME 0000369 U.S. 00/00/0000 0042569 000036.9 U.S. 00/00/0000 0042569 0000369 U.S. 00/00/0000 0042569 0000369'U.S. 0/0000 0042569 0000369 U.S. 00/00/0000 0042569 0000369 U.S. 0/00/0000 0042569 0000369 U;S. 00/00/0000 0042569 0000369 U.S 0/00/0000 004257 POSTMASTER 03/08/1996 INVOICE NUMBER TYPE LAST TRANS POSTMASTER 03/08/1996 POSTMASTER 03/08/1996 POSTMASTER 03/08/1996 POSTMASTER 03/08/1996 POSTMASTER 03/0S/1996 POSTMASTER 03/09/1996 POSTMASTER 03/00/1996 REO N REO N REG N REG N RED N RED N REO N REO N REPORT NUMBER AMOUNT 262.65 301.57 35.82 3.72 2 3 4 PROGRAMS 01131.3U GROUP NUMEIE ACCOUNTING PERIODS 00269 1 +Olds 07/1996 "` TRANS4 TRANS DATE VOUCHER NK TIO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P. 1.600 03/08/1996 003296 00 010-2500-425.21-10 REPLENISH POSTAGE METER 1700 03/0S/1996 003297 00 Oi REPLENISH POSTAGE METER 6 1.800 03/00/1996 003290 00 010-3100-431.21-60 REPLENISH POSTAGE METER f 03/08/1996 003299 00;010-3200*"'4 /SH POSTAGE METER 2000 03/08/1996 003300 00 010-3300-431.21-10 REPLENISH POSTAGE METER 2100„03/08/1996 003301 00 010--4100--410.21-10 PLENISH POSTAGE METER 29 2200 03/08/1996 003302 00 050-9000-450.21--10 REPLENISH POSTAGE METER 1 .2300 03/08/1996 003303 J POSTAGE -UTILITY BILLS 3a COUNT; AMOUNTS ar (1 6 v 9 '0 PROGRAMS GM313U ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST GROUP NUMBER S 00270. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ACCOUNTING PERIODS 09/1996 TRANS'. TRANS DATE VOUCHER PK ACCOUNT NUMBER 100 03/12/1996 003304 00 010-S100-431.21-•90 REPAIR REAR DOOR LOCK POLICE DEPARTMENT " 200 03/12/1996 003305 00 010-3100-431,31-20 •' • _IMBURSEMEN'F FOR CLEW TRAINING -POLICE DEBT:' 16 17 300 03/12/1996 003306 00 010-3100-431.33--50 CIti VEHICLE WASHES . P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME CHECK$ CHECK b REPORT NUMBER INVOICE NUMBER it TYPE LAST TRANS 0000946 A-1 LOCK N KEY SERVICE 21146 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0001215 BARBARA THOMAS REG 15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000216 CAR WASH DEPOT 63 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 400 03/12/1996 003307 TOWd3NoFOR UNIT Ai '500 03/12/1996 003308 GASOLINE CITY VEHICLES 0:010r3100�431.34-!11,- 10 POLXCE DEPARTMENT''' 00 010-3100-431.21-70 - 0000218 CASTELLANO'S TOWING SERV. 23307 /15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000226 CHEVRON, U.S.A. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 `6 600 03/12/1996-,003309 ' GASONE�CITY VEHICLES 29 700 03/12/1996 003310 00 GASOLINE CITY VEHICLES 111 33j 3n ,e 19 -50 r. 010-4.100-410.21-70 '0000226 CHEVRON, U.S.A. *03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000226 CHEVRON, U.S.A. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 GOO 03/12/1996 003311 00.050-9000-A50.21-70 E1$OL.INE'GITY VEHICLES 900 03/12/1996 003312 0 IASOLINE CITY VEHICLES 1000 03/12/1996" 003313 0 _Ofi dLI_ME-STTY _VEHICLE0 40 •' 1100 03/12/1996 003314 ""_GASOLINE CX'1'Y VEHICLES 17t 461 1200V3/12/1996- 003315 HICr E KRUteMEMI_BEFOIR9 1300 03/12/1996 003316 _. YEHIGLE_EUU1F'MENT__RE.F'11:LR9 1400 03/12/1996 003317 �'-' __VF_HICLE. ECUIP. 1E::NT_ REPAIRS __. t._ 1500 03/12/1996 00331G ZTIKN_._TEST .LANDSCAPE 11._ 0 010-3300-431..21-70 0 '.010--32.15?-•431.21-70 00 010-4150-410.21-70 00 0103100- 00 010-31.00-431.33-11. POLICE DEPART 0000226 CHEVRON, U.S.A. 5/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000226 CHEVRON, U.S.A. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 �•r ,0000226 CHEVRON, U.S.A. /1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000226 CHEVRON, U.S.A. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000238 COM„SER CO. 996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000230 COM SER CO. MENT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 00 010-3100-431.33-11 EOI_SCE DEF'LMENT'.___�_ 00 010-1210-412.30-90 DRKER 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 IRRIaajION LEADW 0000238 COM SER CO. -4/15/19960000000. 00/00/0000 N STMT N STMT N STMT N.. STMT N STMT N STMT N 01-008925-001 N 01-006925-002• N 0000246 COOPERATIVE PERSONNEL. SER 3479 N 29.00 17.50 62.51 99•62 16.23 78.23 793.02 296.00 7 9 15 PROGRANI 0MU, GROUP NUMBL ACCOUNTING PERIO " ' 00270. •',„.OUNTS PAYABLE TRANSO TRANS.DiE VOUCHER BI< DESCRIPTION'.1 .,=•'• • ,• ' . ACCOUNTS PAYABLE "'DATE LIST 1600 03/12/1996 003319 00 010-2500-425.21-10 OREENPAR COMPUTER PAPER • 1700 03/12/1996 003320 TUITION —RECORDS SEMINAR 1000 03/12/1996 003321 REINl DURSETEMPORARY DIN 199003/12/1996 003322 14 2000 03/12/1996 003323 UTILITIES 00 01073100-431.,31-25 • T140MA8/POLICE DEPARTMENT 00 065-0000-201.06-01 SERVICE CANCELLED 0002577250410•15-10, VENDOR VENDOR NAME .:0-0cHroocu DATE INVOICE NUMBER TYPE LAST TRANS 0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 196701 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 V 0000179 CPOA REPORT NC"^ER 21 504.15 STMT 0.3/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0002103 DAVID Co HARE JR. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST. 3/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 00 025-7250-410.35-10 0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 2100 03/12/1996 003324 00 028-7iV,041,943* - ",0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST.BTMT 27 LITIES • -''--01/1 1/96 0000000 00/00/0600 RED STMT 89.94- DIST. STMT 2200 03/12/1996 003325 00r_025-7250-410.35-10 UTILITIES 2300 03/12/1996, 003326 " OVERNIGHT MAIL TO DMG 00 010-1110,4 .21-10_ 0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER DIST. STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000484 FEDERAL EXPRESS 5-726-70910 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 34 39 3 37 39 39 2500 03/12/1996 003320 00 096-9700-470.30-90 REDEVELOPMENT CONSULTING SERVICES 7502 0001299 GRC REDEV, CONSULTANTS. I 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 ,2600 03/12/1996 .003329 00,010^1100431.34-06 PHONE SERVICES 2700 03/12/1996 003330 -10NE SERVICES ,2800 03/12/1996 :003131 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 2900 03/12/1996 003332 " ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 49 3600 03/12/1996 603333 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 00 010-2500-425.35-16 00 446;41600'445 C.Filt* 12 00 046-8000-450.30-90 C.F.D. 02 00 043-8.501450,3090• A.D. 94.*1 3100 03/12/1996 003334 00 042-8501-450.30-90 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES A.D. 94-1 "I STMT 31.05 15.59 2.366.75 0600526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. . STMT 15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 . , 0901408 GOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 157—IN 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 STMT 0001400 GOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 322—IN 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0001400 GOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 317—IN 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0001408 GOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 317--IN 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 : 170.4k11, 28.60 10449.00 186.03 • PROGRAM: GM313U ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST ,H., REPORT, NUMBER 21 GROUP NUMBER ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 00270 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 09/1996 .044!",444::.411444,,,11.-441314114 a a. -14.4 ‘4,;::4•P' 12 i3 14 r 9 OROWA,OPtittiTED:•-11Y:•:61i11,1:11'111:41:,:••14i.•:11;::.11•11*: 1.• ..111'1:;'1:11'' 11'114:,5 • TRANSO TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER otsoupTION 1 3200 03/12/1996 003335 00 010-3210-431.21-/0 FILM DEVELOPING FIRE PREVENTION PRQJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DATE , CHECK* CHECK DATE TYPE LASI- TRANS 0000595 HOT SHOTS 1 HOUR PHOTO 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 3300 03/12/1996 003336 00 010-2500,-425.34-05 1 4NUAL AS100 LEASEPURCHASE Y.- 3400 03/12/1996 003337 00 096-9700-470.40-01 14 BUILDING FLAN CHECK REVIEW OF SKATE N FUN 7233 N 0001093 I.B.M. CORPORATION-574 1305015 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0002105 JAS PACIFIC, INC. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 ! 300 03/12/1996 003338 00 0104-1210-412.36-25' !!LBLOCK AD -POLICE C9MMANDER 3600 03/12/1996 003339 00 010-3J00-431.21-35 UNIFORM EQUIPMENT FOR DODSON-POLICE DEPARTMENT 76 5700 03/12/1996 003340 00 010-3100-431./1-10, . _ . UNIFORM EOUIPMENr FOR DouSoN-PeLicE DEPARTMENT 29 3800 03/12/1996 003341 00 010-3100-431.30-15 O FILM PROCESSING POLICE DEPARTMENT 4000 03/12/1996 003343 00 010-3100-431.21-10 POUCE_DEPARTMENT " 4100 03/12/1996 003344 00 010-2500-425.35-12 17ILITIES 22 4200 03/12/1996 UTILITIF$ 4300 03/12/1996 UTILITIES -41 A400 03/12/1996 4500 03/12/1996 _W_AN.174Lys'.m. 4600 03/12/1996 2!_WELDIN0_BUFPLIES ('11 4700 03/12/1996 -04ELBINO .SUEFLLES h :11 003345 00 -010-3100-431.35-12 003346 00 010-6100-425.35-12 •, 0000640 JOBS AVAILABLE 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 510 N 604092 N 0000610 LONG PEACH UNIFORM CO. 78661 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000618 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. 03/15/1996 . 0000000 00/00/0000 0000696 LONGS DRUG STORE 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 78661 N AMOUNT 48.23 3,214.4 • -i--..'"1.:1:111.1M,11W1416 1..100.00 108.00 430.95 073-92675 N 0000883 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 196456 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000436 SO. CALIFORNIA OAS 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000436 SO. CALIFORNIA GAS.CO. 0315/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000436 SO. CALIFORNIA GAS 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 003347 00 010 -7400=425.35 -12 003340 00 010-3100-431.30-16 POLICE DEPARTMENT 003349 00 050-9000-450.33-30 oxyuEN__WATER DEPARTmENT 003350 00 050-9000-450.33-30 OxitwIN WATEB_PEPARTmENT 0000436 $0. CALIFORNIA GAS 9)15/1996 0000000 ooioof0000 N CO. STMT N STMT N CO. STMT N 0001182 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000425 STEVE4S AUTO PARTS 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000425 STEVE'S AUTO PARTS 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 CO., STMT N 107164 N 932780 N 72289 110.01:1144i14.311111111'11:1'1"11' 30.63 5.3tp 44 229.42 •-• 94.26 • 00.;1'0110 v.:00 180.00 78.73 • ••••••••••••:::9::::::::,::, q3.25 FRD0Rf'IM2 M3138 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 21 n GROOPitMeATE010), 3 GROUP WPATEP' GROUP NUMB, 3 00270 OUNTB PAYABLE 09/1996- ACCOUNTING. PEFUcrn2 6 TRANS O TRANS DATE 'VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME DESCR/PTISN i DESDRIPTIOWE'' 2 ,.' '0. DMDATE CHECK* CHECK DATE -11 Ifi I> 4800 03/12/1996 003351 LEGAL CONSULTATION 00 096-9700-470.30-90 SERVICE -REDEVELOPMENT INVOICE NUMBER TYPE LAST rRANS 0000412 STRADLINO, YOCCA, CARLSON 94 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 4900 03/12/1996 003352 LONG DISTANCE CHARGES 5000 03/12/1996 003353 LONG DISTANCE CHARGES 00 010-3100-431,35-16 00 010-4150-410.35-16 0001980 U.S. LONG DISTANCE STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0001980 U.S. LONG DISTANCE 03/ 5 1996 0000000 00/00/0000 5100 03/12/1996 003354 00 DISTANCE CHARGES 12 7.1 1.0-2500-.425.35-16 5200 03/12/1996 003355 00 099-9700-470..40-01 THIRD STREET HOUSING PROJECT 0001980• U.S. LONG DISTANCE 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 STMT N STMT N AMOUNT 1,932.45 ....._.. 51.23 3354, Z9 7574 0001994 WESTERN AMERICAN DESIGN STMT 11,255.00 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 . , 5300 03/14/1996 003498 00 0102500..4254.34-05 0000296 DIVINE REAL ESTATES REO 1k1S54.45"k".- OFF/CE LEASE 312 E.,MAIN 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 5400 03/14/1996 003499 00 010-2500-425.40-45 COMPUTER NETWORK IMPROVEMENTS 7537 0002025 MICRO AGE/JAGUAR COMPUTER 502237 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 11 '15 117 31; 101 111; +121 '7111 1r'r I17 COUNT: AMOUNTS tR0UP TOTALS 52 31.331.62 N 191.87 FRU-IRAN: OM313U ACCUUNT8 PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 21 GROUP NUMBER 00273 ACCOUNTS ACCOUNTING PERIOD t 09/1996 oRpu, USER -IL OROUR tile81411E11) PY":: r4 mouplio By- - ' PAYABLE *13 9 TRANS -'TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECK. CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 1.00 03/13/1996 003356 00 M0-1100-411.21-10 PLAQUE-PAMELASTER 200 03/13/1996 003357 EOM FOR K-9 UNITS " 300 03/13/1996 003358 PILLING STATEMENTS W1TH '1 400 03/13/1996 003359 PIPE & SUPPLIES 500 03/13/1996 003360 'P1PE &SUPpLIES 600 03/13/1996 003361 DRAINANTI PLEN1014PPOE.__ 700 03/13/1996 003362 VIDEO 011 DEODLYYORCL . 800 03/1S/1996 003363 CITY TO CITY RECYCLING 9Q0 03/13/1996 003364 'OrV1109.EI1EI4I13ALAYqTUDY 1000 03/13/1996 003365 L; REMOVAL OF RADIO FROM 1100 03/13/1996 003366 HYDRAULIC HCJSE 1200 03/13/1996 003367 J;ITY._ATIORNEY LERAL,_ 1300 03/13/1996 003368 CITY ATTORNEY LEGAL 1400 03/13/1996 003369 ,19,CITY ATTORNEY_LEOAL._ .521 1500 03/13/1996 003370 '_.C:M.,ATTORNEY,LEGAL_ _ 00 010^-3100-'431•21-13 POLICE DEPARTMENT 00 010-2500-425.21-10 CITY LOGO 00 050-9000-.450•33.-30 WATER DEPARTMENT 00 055-4170-450.21-8o SEWER DEPARTMENT 00 010-7400-425,33-10 DRAIN PIPES-COMM* CENTER 00 010-3100-431.21-16 PgrjcEDEPARTMENT 00 066-0051-450•34-06 JANUARY COLLECTIONS 00 010-2500-425.30-90 2ND-LAST PAYMENT 00 010-3100-431o33-11 DETE.CTIVEAN;7 • 00 050-9000-450.33-30 FOR BACKHOE 00 042-8501 -450•30-•90 SERVICESEEPRUARY 1996 , 0000997 ANADY'S TROPHIES 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0001161 ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000952 ARROW 03/15/1996 0000000 0000985 B & W 03/15/1996 0000000 PRINTING 00/00/0000 PIPE & SUPPLY 00/00/0000 00009E5 6 W PIPE & SUPPLY 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000150 BLUE RIBBON PLUMBING 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0002112 CALIBRE PRCSS, INC. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 .0000553 CITY OF HEMET 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0002054 COMP PLUS 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000238 COM SER CO. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0001700 CONTRACTORS ENUIPMFNT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 00 046-81300-450.30-90 SERVICES-FEBRUARY 1996 00 096-'97007470630-90 9ERYICFS.47EBRUARY 1996 00 010-1111-411.30-90 QERVI,CF9,7FEBRUARY 1996 0000251 COX 6. COX 03/15/1996 9090000 00/00/0000 0000251 COX 6 COX 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000251 COX & COX 03/15/1996 ' 0000000 00/00/0000 0000251 COX 6 COX 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 5668 N 35900 N STMT N STMT N 648'77 N 196237 N REO N N STMT AMOUNT 67.88 56.00 329.14 -• • :„.......k1"..,8200...!2,ek.„,.,,r1 6.85 ' 49400 ..', 606.00 270901.72 0/00913800000 N 1 0795)0 N STMT N STMT N STMT N STMN 2,400.00 120000 ' 19.90 11.0.00 90.400 20052.58 PROGRAMS 0I7"'i GROUP NUMB. t 00273 ACCOUNTS F'AYABLF-'IPDAI'E LIST JOUNT6 PAYABLE REPORT NI1"19ER ACCOUNTING PERIODS 'TGRUUP USER:. ID" OROUP`CREATED )Y,: OROUPUPDATED BY z 3 09/1996 T'RANSG TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK. ACCOUNT NUM DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 1600 03/13/1996 003371 HEADSETS 6 AMPLIFIERS 1700 03/13/1996 003372 ADVERTISEMENT 1800 03/13/1996 003373 ANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE: 00 062-3100-431.40-45 POLICE DEPARTMENT 00 010-1210-412.30-90. FINANCE DIRECTOR 00 025-7250-410.34--05 CONTRACT PROJ P.0. VENDOR VENDOR NAM INVOICE NUMBER ATE- TYPE LAST 'TRANS 0002111 C 6 S PRODUCTS, INC. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 5E123 N 0001164 CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF 319 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7473 0000263 D 6 JI...ANDSCAPEC 6 MAINTEN 10657 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 1900 03/13/1996 003374 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE -2.000 03/13/1996 003375 . LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE: 00 025-7251-410,34-05 CONTRACT 00 025.-7252- •410.34-05 CONTRACT 2100 03/13/1996 003376 00 025-7232-41.0 OPHER CONTROL . 2200 03/13/1996 003377 GOPHER CONTROL. 2300 03/13/1996 003378 OPHER CONTROL 2400 03/13/1996 003379 SEWER FEE COLLECTIONS 00 025-7251-410.34--05 00 025-7250-410.34•-05 00 065-0000-201.08--70 JANUARY COI.L.ECTIONS N 7473 0000263 D & J LANDSCAPE 6 MAINTEN 10657 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7473 0000263 D 6 J LANDSCAPE 6 MAINTEN 10657 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 7503 0000263 D & J LANDSCAPE 6 MAINTEN 10656 3/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N N 7503 0000263 D 6 J LANDSCAPE 6 MAINTEN 1.0656 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 7503 0000263 D & J-LANDSCAPE 6 MAINTEN 10656 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000460 EASTERN MUNI.WATER 011-1T. REG 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 2500 03/13/1996 003380 '1 BACTERIAL ANALYSIS 2600 03/13/1996 003381 _BACTERIAL ANALYSIS 00 050-9000-450.33-30 00 050-9000-450.33-30 0000949 E.S. BABCOCK 6 SONS ' 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000949 E.S. BABCOCK 6 SONS 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 2700 03/13/1996 003382 00 050-9000-450.33 BACTERIAL ANALYSIS 0" 0000949 E.S. -BABCOCK 4 SONS 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 11 2800 03/13/1996 003383 00 050-9000-450.33-30 BACTERIAL ANALYSIS 2900 03/13/1996 BACTERIAL ANALYSIS 3000 03/13/1996 PUBLIC WORKS 0000949 E.S. BABCOCK 6 SONS 03/15/1996. 0000000 00/00/0000 003384 00 050-9000-450.33-30 00330:S 0 025- 100-410 30--90 ADMINISTRATION 0 0000949 E.S. BABCOCK 6 SONS /1996 0000000 '00/00/0000 61492 N 2'7E161. N 27739 N 61192 N 61222 N 0000477 E:VANS 6 ASSOCIATES STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 1,095.23 2,728.25 3,707.63 G7.50 32, 1'79.73 40.00 22.00 12.00 300.00 PROORAM: 0133130 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 21 .3 GROUP NUMBER 00273 ACCOUNTS 'PAYABLE ACCOUNT/NO PERIOD% 09/1996 GROUP USER ID , ,--6110E.'4il'4 13R8UP-CREATED BY 'ANNENZ' GROUP UPDATED 3Y ANNE TRANS4 TRANS BATE VOUCHERBK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROD P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION „ DUE DATE CHECK6 CHECK DATE TYPE LAST Tr4Ng- 3100 03/13/1996 003386 00 010-4150-410.30-90 EUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 3200 03/13/1996 003387 00 025-7250-410.30-90 WORKS ADMINISTRATION 3300 03/13/1996 003388 00 050-9000-450.30-90 '1 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 3400 03/13/1996 003389 00 055-4170-450.30-90 ruBLic WORKS ADMINISTRATION 3500 03/13/1996 003390 00 025-7251-410.30-90 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION 3600 03/13/1996 003391 rmcic WORKS °I. 3700 03/13/1996 PUBLIC WOWS 3800 03/13/1996 M TIRES &_SUPRLIES 3900 03/13/1996 & SUPPLIES 4000 03/13/1996 TIRES & SUPPLIES 4100 03/13/1996 44, ... y_ 1 4300 03/13/1996 F-IONE SERVICES 4200 03/13/1996 PHONE SERVICES__ 4400 03/13/1996 PHONE SERVICES 4500 03/13/1996 LPHONE SERVICES 00 025-7250-4/0.30-90 ADMINISTRATION 003392 00 025-7252-410.30-90 ADMINISTRATION 003393 00 010-3100-431.33-50 _ POLICE_DEPARTMENT 003394 00 050-9000-450.33-50 WATER DEPARTMENT 003395 00 025-7100-410.33-50 PARKB DEPARTMENT 003396 00 010-7100-431.2/-70 POLICE DEPARTMENT ,003397 00 016-4150-410.35-16 003396 00 003399 00 010-3100-431.35-16 003400 00 010-3200-431.35-16 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 010-2500-42.5.35-16 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 03/151996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000477 EVANS.& ASSOCIATES 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000477 EVANS 6ASSOCIATES 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000483 EVANS TIRE CO. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000403 EVANS TIRE CO. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000483 EVANS TIRE CO. 03/15/19/6 0000000 00/00/0000 • 0002107 FLEET SERVICES 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 STMT 13 STIIT 13 STMT 13 STMT 13 STMT 13 STMT 13 STMT 13 STMT N STM13 STMT 13 STMT 13 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. STMT 13 STMT 13 STMT 13 STMT 13 AMOUNT 1 7 2 5 . 0 0. 375.00 1.012.50 375.00 150.00 75.00 75..00 2 # 8284610 468.56 408412 245.43 27,15 - --a -• ------- 372.17 569421 64.79 PROGRAMS GM ACCOUNTS PAYABLE .UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 4 4 10 GROUP NUMBL.: ACCOUNTING PERIODI GROUP USER " AD GROUP CREATED BY 00273 09/1996` TRANSS TRANS DATE VOUCHER NK DESCRIPTION 1 LEBCfi. OUNTSPAYABLE ACCOUNT NUMBER 4600 03/13/1996 003401 00 010-4150-410.35-16 ONE SERVICES 4700 03/13/1996 003402 00 010-7400-425.35»16 5 PHONE SERVICES 17 4800 03/13/1996, 003403 00 025-7252-410.35-16 PHONE SERVICES F'ROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DUE DATE CHECK! 154ECK DATE TYPE LAST -TRANS 0000526 GENERAL.. TELEPHONE CO. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000526 GENERAL. TELEPHONE CO. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000526 GENERAL. TELEPHONE CO. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 4900 03/13/1996 003404 00 050-900 HONE SERVICES M-16 - 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 5000 03/13/1996 003405 00 055-4170-450.35- �� PHONE SERVICES .5100 03/13/1996 ;.1 PHONE SERVICES id 5200,03/13/1996 PHONE SERVICES 003406 00.010-2500-425.35-1 003407 00 010-3.100--431..35-16 5300 03/13/1996 00340B 00 042-550.1-450.30-90 )MINISTRATIVE SERVICES A.D. 07-1 5400 03/13/1996 003409 0 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 5300 03/13/1996 003410 0 EGAL ALIVE:RTISING 3600 03/13/1996 00 =GAL ADVERT]:SING 5700 03/13/1996 LEGAL ALIVERTISING 5800 03/13/1996 L..EUAL ADVERTISINF3 0 043-9501-450.30•-90 A.D. 94-1 0 010-1110-411.36-25 411 00 010--1210-412.36-25 003412 00 010-1700-417.36-25 003413 00 010-1110-411,36-25 5900 03/13/1996 003414 S.J. POLICE ASSOCIATION 00 010-3100-431.11-10 WELLNESS PROGRAM 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. A5/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000526 GENERAL TELEPHONE: CO. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0001408 GOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 000140G GOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 03 0000566 HEMET NEWS 15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000566 HEMET NEWS 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000566 HEMET NEWS 03/15/1946 0000000 00/00/0000 0000566 HEMET NEWS 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 6000 03/13/1996 003413 00 010-3100-431.30-15 FINUERF'RINTS FUR LEA'S UFFICE-POLICE DEPARTMENT 0000569 HRC HEMET FAMIL.Y FITNESS 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000595 HOT SHOTS 1 HOUR PHOTO 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 STMT N STMT N STMT N STMT • N STMT N STMT N STMT N 641-IN N 641.-IN N STMT N STMT N STMT N STMT N FEU N 7239 N 29.79 156.37 G0.56 559.03 106.04 161410 3,110.70 53.70 302 .2 4 PROORAM: 8M313U ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER ' 21 ° 4 9 GROUP NUMBER 1 00273 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 09/1996 BROW USER ID ; ANNE GROUP 'CREATED BY t ANNE r GROUP UPDATED BY t ANNE TRANS: TRANS DAIE VOUCHER DK ACCOUNT NUMBER 1: DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 ' ' 6100 03/13/1996 003416 00 046-01300-450.30-90 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES C.P,D1 02 pRoJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DUE DATE CHECK' CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 03/ 0001400 GOVERNMENT FINANCE GROUP 648--IN 5/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000600 HUBBS STATIONERY 6200 03/13/1996 003417 00 010-1400-414.21-10 SUPPLIES ,..„, 6300 03/13/1996 003418 00 010-1400-414.21-A0 ^ OFFICE SUPPLIES 6400 03/13/1996 003419 00 010-2500-425.21-10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 6500 03/13/1996 003420 00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 6600 03/13/1996 003421 00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 6700 03/13/1996 003422 00 IFFTcr LJFFI.TE5 6800 03/13/1996 " OFFICE SUPPLIES 003423 00 6900 03/13/1996 003424 00 WFICESUPPLIES 010-2500-425021.-10 010-1400-414.21-10 010-1400-414.21-10 010-2500-425•21-10 050-9000-450.21-10 7000 63/13/1996 003425 00 010-1400-414.21-10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7100 03/13/1996 003426 ' SERVICE COMPUTER FOR 7200 03/13/1996 003427 POLICE ,SERoEANT Al) 7300 03/13/1996 003128 BESION OF 'TRAFFIC SIGNALS 7400 03/13/1996 CHECK WATER HEATER rz 7500 03/13/1996 FtUMDING SURF.LIES 003429 03/15/1996 0000000 0000600 HUBBS 03/15/1996 0000000 0000600 HUBBS 03/15/1996 0000000 0000600 HUBBS 03/15/1976 0000000 00 050-9000-450.21-10 PRINTER OUTLET -WATER DEPT 00 010-1210-412.30-90 0000600 HUBBS 03/15/1996 0000000 0000600 HUBBS 03/15/1996, 0000000 0000600 HUBBS 03/15/1996 0000000 0000600 HUBBS 03/15/1996 0000000 0000600 HUBBS 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 STATIONERY 00/00/0000 STATIONERY 00/00/0000 STATIONERY 00/00/0000 STATIONERY 00/00/0000 STATIONERY 00/00/0000 STATIONERY 00/00/0000 STATIONERY 00/00/0000 STATIONERY 00/00/0000 0001027 JB COMPUTERS 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 00 041-4155-410.40-01 STATE 6 COTTONWOOD/RAMONA 00 010-3100-431.33-10 POLICE DEPARTA.LNT_ 003430 00 050-9000-450.33-30 _ _WATER_PEPARTMNT 0000640 JOBS AVAILABLE 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 291173 N 291173 N 290592 N 290593 N 291188 N 10084 N 290741 N 290E170 N 291172 N 960245 N 605086 N 7494 0001960 KIMLEY HORN 6 ASSOCIATES. 52695 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000807 LARRY 03/15/1996 000000_0. 0000807 LARRY 03/15/1996 0000000 PIERCE PLUMBING 00/00/0000 PIERCE PLUMBING 00/00/0000 725 N STMT N AMOUNT 1.449.00 3*.?'6 17.74 123.90 123.90 6e.53 11.28- 43.00 64.60 91.08 93.60 : 1.200.0-7 40.00 3'72.91 PROGRAM: 1311:3 1 31J ACCOUNTS PAYABLE_ UPDATE LIST REPORT NI�MAER 21 c GROUP NUM - t 00273 09/1996 ACCOUIJTING PERIOD: GROUP. USER ID > i At -? CJROUP CREATED,Bl' GROUP UPDATED BY FRANSI: TRANS DATE VIIUCHER -BK DESCRIPTION 1 DE COUNTS PAYABLE ACCOUNT NUMBER F'ROJ t",RI MN 2 7600 03/13/1996 003431' PLUMBING SUPPLIES 7700 03/13/1996 003432 PATCHES 71300 03/13/1996 003433 UNIFORM FOR CHAPLAIN 7900 03/13/1996 003434 FILM PROCESSING 0000 03/13/1996 003435 WATER METER SUPPLIES 00 010-4100-410.33-30 PUBLIC WORKS 00 010-3100-431,21-35 POLICE DEPARTMENT 00 010-3100--431.21--35 COOPER --POLICE DEPARTMENT 00 010-3100-431,30-15 POLICE DEPARTMENT 00 050-9000-450.33 -30 F.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME DUE DATE CHECK. CHECK :ATE T 0000007 LARRY FIERCE PLUMPING 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 INVOICE NUMBER EAST MANE:- STMT N 0000610 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. 213912 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000618 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO. 1.68309 /15/1996 0000000 09/00/0000 0000696 LONGS DRUG.STORE 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000710 MARDEN--SLISCO 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 9100 03/13/1996 003436 WATER (METER SUPPLIES 9200 03/13/1996 003437 I:-9 MAINTE?DANCE TRAINING 8300 03/13/1996 003430 > FLOOR MATS 0400 03/13/1996 003439 UNIFORM_CLEANING 0500 03/13/1996 003440 UNIFORM CLEANING R600 03/13/1996 003441 -LOOK MATS 00 050-9000-450.33-30 00 010-3100-431.21--13 NOVEMBER 1995 00 010-2500-425.33-10 00 01.0-41.50-410.21-35 00 010-4150-410.2 00 010-7400-425.33-10 0000710 MARDEN-SUSCO 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0001RG1 MASTER K-9 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 92743 N 1271420, N 211.2 N 0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT /15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000732 MISSSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000732 MISSION LINIFORM SERVICES STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 8700 03/13/1996 003442 00 055- 170-450.21- UNIFORM CLEANING 131300 03/13/1996 003443 00 010--4150•410.21-35 Pi UNIFORM CLEANING °I 0900 03/13/1996 003444 00 050-9000-450.21-35 'i. UNIFC)RM CL.EANING 9000 03/13/1996 003415 00 010•-3100-431 34-05 RADIO (::(7FIMUNICATION EO111PMENT LEASE-P.D. N STMT N STMT N 0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000732 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICES STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0001054 MOTOROLA CREDIT C(:ir r 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 2000067136 N AMOUNT 54.64 190.34 547.26 75.00 25.12 51 2:L.10 75.32 1.453.42 PROGRAMt 0M313U ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST REPORT NUMBER 21 1 3 4 GROUP NUMBER ACCOUNTING ROURAisER GROUP -CREATED BY GROUP UPDATED BY ! 00273 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE PERIOD09/1996 ANNE t 'ANP4E, ANt4E , 6 TRANS* TRANS BATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER 7 DEScRIPTIoN.1 DESCRIPTION 2 9100 03/13/1996 003446 00 010-3100-431.34-05 RAD10 COMMUNICATION 9200 03/13/1996. EFUSE COLLECTIONS 9300 03/13/1996 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT LEASE-P.D. 003447 00 065.- 0000-201.08-69 JANUARY COLLECTIONS 003449 00 010-3100-431.21-30 POLICE DEPARTMENT 9400 03/13/1996 003449 00 010-3100-431.21-90 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPARTMENT 9500 03/13/1996 003450 00 010-2500-425.33-10 -I; FIRE ALARM SERVICES 9600 03/13/1996 "1 rAGER RENTAL 9700 03/13/1996 -"P PAGER RENTAL 9800 03/13/1996 PAGER.RENTAL 9900 03/13/1996 'AC-3ER RENTAL_ 10000 03/13/1996 !1; STAFF ASSISTANCE 003451 00 010-4150-410.35-16 MARCH 1996 003452 00 050-9000-450.35-16 MARCH 1996 003453 00 010-2500-425.35-16 MARCH 1996 003454 00010-3100-431.35-46 mORCH 1996 003455 00 0/0-1110-4ii.3A-o5 DEPUTY CITY CLERK 10100 03/13/1996 003456 00 010-3100-431.34-05 CITATIONS PROCESSED POLICE DEPARTMENT _ 001/15/A9960 0000000 00/00/0000 PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DUE DATE CHECK0 CHECK DATE TYPE LAST 'MART 0001054 MOTOROLA CREDIT CORP. 0311511996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000770 O.K. ASSOC. INC. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000700 OVERNIGHT INDUSTRIAL 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000780 OVERNIGHT INDUSTRIAL 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000963 PACIFIC ALARM SVC. 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000795 PAGENET 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000795 PAGENFT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 5 0000795 PAGENET 996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000795 FAGENET 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000606 PAMELA LEE .03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 1020003/13/1996 003457 00 010-.3210.7431.34-05 POSTAGE MEIER RENTAL . , „ 10300 03/13/1996 003458 00 050-9000-450.34-05 POSTAGE METER RENTAL 10400 03/13/1996 003459 00 010-7400-425.34-05 POSTAGE METER RENTAL '1 10500 03/13/1996 003460 00 010-2500-425.34-05 POSTAGE METER RENTAL 0001517 PHOENIX OROUP 0000810 PITNEY BOWES 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000910 PITNEY ['OWES 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000810 PITNEY BOWES 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000810 PITNEY BOWES 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 200006797 N rEG N 12374 N 12352 N STMT N A762159 N A762159 N A762159 N A762160 N STMT 9764-00 N AMOUNT 762.58 108.063.52 " 127.73 +50,75 292.00 44.00 22.00 11..00 122.00 .1.0494 40 90.00 799993 25° N 799993 N 799993 N 799993 N 25.98 25.97 25.98 „,„ F-'R(:1ORAM: OM31. 311 GROUP NUMB, 00273 ACCOUNT NO PERIOD] 09/1996 GROUPU. ER 1'D t ''. AN OROUR CREATED IIY $ AN. 0R0UP UPi3ATs; D HY ; AN ;OUNTS PAYABLE TF<ANS4 TRANS L1A VOUCHER BK ON i. ACCOUNTS PAYAPLF t.1F't}ATE LIST ACCOUNT NUMBER PROD P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME 10600 03/13/1996 003461 00 099-9700-470.34--05 0 POSTAGE METER RENTAL INVOICE NUMBER E—TYPE LAST I RAN, 0000810 PITNEY BOWES 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 10700 03/13/1996 003462 00 010-3100-431.34-05 0000810 F'ITNEY BOWES POSTAGE METER kEN1'AL. - 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 t0800 03/13/1996 003463 00 010-1700-41.7.34-05 'OSTAUE METER RENTAL. 0000810 PITNEY BOWES 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 • 10900 03/13/1996 003464 ]ONVERSION OF APARTMENTS 11000 03/13/1496 003465 CUT ROOTS-SAN JACINTO 11100 03/13/1996 003466 TRAFFIC ACCIDENT- INVEST. 11200 03/13/1996 003467 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 39 11300 03/13/1996 00346B INSTALL ELECTRICAL BRAKE. 11400 03/13/1996 003469 REF AIR BRAKES ON SEWER 1 11500 03/13/1996 003470 COIIMUNIT'Y CENTER 11600 03/13/1996 003471 ASOL.INE--POLICL UNITS E6) 'I 11800 03/13/1996 0034?3 -"' HARDWARE FOR RANGE 11700 03/13/1996 0034'72 ARREN RD. REHABILITATION 00 099-9700-470.40--01- SHAVER Z, JORDAN 799993 N 799993 N 799993 N 7548 6002059 PUEBLO DEVELOPMENT COMPAN 9608 15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 00 010-3200-431.33-10 FIRE STATION 00 010-3100-431.31-25 0000037 [MAST TREE: SERVICE: 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 STMT N 0002069 RIVERSIDE_ COMMUNITY COLLE 6747 POLLITT-POLICE DEPARTMENT 03/15/199h 0000000 00/00/0000 N 00 010-3100-431.21-30 POL.ICE DEPARTMENT 00 055-4170.'450.33-30 1c1NTRF.)L-UNYT 330E/SEWER 00 055-4170-450.33-30 TRAILER 00 029-8661-440.40-01 REHABILITATION PROJECT 00 010-3.100-431.21--70 00 022-4150-410.40-01 PROJECT 0000803 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPPLY 196702 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0002108 ROGERS TRAILER SERVICE 2384 3/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 00021.08 ROGERS TRAILER SERVICE: 2388 ,03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 00 010-3100-431.21-16 POLICE DEPARTMENT 7586 0002110 ROSE CONSTF<l1CTION 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0002109 7-11 STORE/25959 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 11.44 STMT N 7571 0002006 SULLY -MILLER CONTRACTINL3 40827 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000022 SHARP BUILDING SUPF'I...Y 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 11900.03/13/1996 003474 00 010-2500-425.35-14 h UTILITIES 12000 03/13/1996 003475 00 010-3.100-431.35.14 JTII...ITIES 520262 N 0000447.50. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA E:DISON CO. STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 N REPORT NUHER 21 AMOUNT 25.97 25.97 172.50 176.97 273.33 45.220.50 58.41. 53.99 1.37.9.69 PROGRAM GM3130 GROUP NUMBER 00273 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE ACCOUNTING PERIOD( 09/1996 1 GROUP USER XD GROUP4CREATED BY . ,3 GROUP !UPDATED BY 1 ANNE ;5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST 1RANSO TRANS DATE VOUCHER'BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROD P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1. DESCAiPTION 2- , , DUE DATE CHECKS CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS • 11, 1.21.00 03/13/1996 003476 00 010-3200-431.35-14 UTILITIES 12200 03/13/1996 003417 00 010-4150-410.35-14 ilLITIES 12300 03/13/1996 00347H 00 010-6100-425.35-14 T" UTILITIES 12400 03/13/1996 003479 7ILITIES I 12500 03/13/1996 003480 UTIL'TTIES 12600 03/13/1996 003481 UTILITIES_ 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000447 GO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0090447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 00 010-7400-425.35-14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 00 025-7100-410.35-14 00 025-7250-410.35-14 12700 03/13/1996 003402 00 025-72E4-410.35-14 UTILITIES 1 12800 03/13/1996 003483 00 025-7252-410.35-14 UTILITIES A 'A 12900 03/13/1996 003484 00 025-7260-410.35-14 13000 03/13/1996 003485 00 025-7260-410.3514 UTILITIES 11 13100 03/13/1996 003486 00 UTILAJIES T1T1 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 51M 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 050-9000-450.35-14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 13200 03/13/1996 003487 00 055-4170-450.35-14 13300 03/13/1996 003488 00 010--4150-410.35-12 UTILITIES _ _ _ -------- 13400 03/13/1996 003489 00 050-"9000-450.33-30 FAX NOTIFICATIONS MATER_PEFARTMENT 13500 03/13/1996 003490 00 025-7260-410.34-05 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 0 / CO. STMT 0000447 BO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT 5/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000436 SO. CALIFORNIA GAS CO. STMT 0 /15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000373 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 96020579 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000354 VALLEY TEEN FOUNDATION 402 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 1TAum REPORT NUMBER 21 AMOUNT 631.03 7640`?""? 57.94 517,65 250.54 4,450 477.92 292.04 .1,042.75 810.12 13,453.01 30.72 50.22 21.25 90.50 PROGRAM: GM"' -0 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE "PBATE LIST 1 , ta 1.- REPORT NP 21 GROUP NUMBLi. t 00273 ,. ,0:0UNTG PAYABLE ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 09/1996 GROUP USER /D ANNE4'7-- ;GROUP CREATED BY . ANNE iaROUP,UPDATED DT TRANSO TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 1 IlLgCR/PT/DN 2 • O 13600 03/13/1996 GRAFFITI REMOVAL. 13700 03/13/1996 003492 00 025-7260-410.34-05 ▪ GRAFFITIREMOVAL PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER --BattFIATE CHECK4 CHECK T1ATE7 TYPE LAST TRANS 00349:1 00-025-7260-410.34-05 0000754 VALLEY TEEN FOUNDATION 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000354 VALLEY TEEN FOUNDATIUN 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 13000 03/13/1996 003493 00 099-9700-470.40-01 7574 0001994 WESTERN AMERICAN DESIGN YARD DRAINS-SAN JACINTO & THIRD STREET PROJECT 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 13900 03/13/1996 003494 00 010-4150-410.33-30 TREFT SIGNS • VARIOUS LOCATIONS 14000 03/13/1996 003495 00 010-3100-431.34-05 COPIER LEASE MAINTENANCE. 141400 03/13/1996 003496 00 010-2500-425.34-05 COPIER LEASE MAINTENANCE 14200 03/13/1996 003497 00 010-3100-431.31-25 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT EOL.ICE DEPARTMENT COUNT: AMOUNT: OUP TOTALS 142 749.769.51 0000316 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000307 XEROX CORPORATION 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0000307 XEROX CORPORATION 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 0002114 MIKE DODSON 03/15/1996 0000000 00/00/0000 399 N 391 N 5TMT N 2E17990 N 50266:1.76 N 50266104 N N REG AMOUNT 102.25 37.50 565.00 5.189.52 221.04 356.23 645.04 DATE CITY OF SAN JACINTO TREASURER REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 1996 INSTITUTION INTEREST MATURITY PRINCIPAL BALANCE SERIAL # RATE DATE AMOUNT PREV. MONTH 2/29/96 State-L.A.I.F. General Serial # 9833794 5.64% OPEN $3,589,607 $2,389,607 f '19/96 State-L,A.I.F _.development Serial # 5133120 5.64% OPEN $2,171,838 $2,171,838 CHECKING First Interstate Serial#3980000/1-98001 OPEN $44,390 $1,911,071 Cash on Hand $700 $700 TOTAL CITY & REDEVELOPMENT INVESTMENTS $5,806,536 $6,473,217 I certify that these investments comply with all State Laws pertaining to the investment of Local Agency Funds and the City of San Jacinto's investment policies. There are sufficient funds to meet the City's next 30 days obligations. Kerr Shaw. Treasurer CITY OF SAN JACINTO •17. THOMAS M. COX JAMES A. COX JULIE M. CLARK March 19, 1996 COX & COX A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW SOS EAST FLORIDA AVENUE HEM ET, CALIFORNIA 92543 TELEPHONE AREA CODE 909 652- 1400 FAX (909) 652-3990 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FRO+`I: Jim Cox RE: Ordinance Affecting Payment for City Clerk Services RECOMMENDATION: Introduce (F.i.rst Reading) Ordinance No. Repealing Section 1 of Ordinance 964, and Pertaining to Payment For City'Clerk Services. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to the Government Code, the compensation for`City Clerk services is to be set by ordinance or resolution. Older Ordinance No. 964 established a fixed compensation for our elected City Clerk, at $125.00 per month. Recently, the City electors have chosen to allow the City Clerk to be appointed, rather than elected. Also recently, the City Council appointed Pamela Lee as the City's Clerk. Pamela Lee has previously been performing services as an independant contractor, and operates her own consulting practice. F,Is. Lee desires to continue serving the City as an independant contractor. The City, likewise, would like to continue Ms. Lee as an independant contractor for the reason that savings may be realized through not being required to make withholdings and other benefits. It is believed that the older ordinance, fixing a salary, is in conflict with the intent to provide services on a contract basis. For this reason, it is recommended that the ordinance be changed to permit the compensation of the City Clerk pursuant to contract. Government Code Section 37103 provides that administrative services of a city may be contracted to any specially trained and experienced person. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE 964, AND PERTAINING TO PAYMENT FOR CITY CLERK SERVICES Statement of Purpose: Pursuant to Government Code Section 36508, in November 1995, the qualified electors of the City of San Jacinto elected that the City Clerk shall be appointive. The City Council desires to retain its options with regard to the appointment and payment of services for the appointed City Clerk, including but not limited to the appointment of existing paid city personnel to perform such functions, or the contracting of the City Clerk function to qualified persons pursuant to the authority of Government Code Section 37103. Accordingly, the previously set salary for the elective City Clerk is no longer required, and that hereafter, the payment for City Clerk services shall be subject to negotiation, contract, or may be established by Resolution as the City Council shall approve, in its discretion. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The appointive City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto shall be paid at such rate or method that the City Council may deem appropriate. The City Council may contract with qualified persons to fill the position of City Clerk on such terms and conditions as the City Council may deem appropriate, including contracting with independent contractors. The City Council, may from time -to -time, by Resolution, establish or thereafter modify the salary or compensation of the appointed City Clerk. Section 2. Section 1 of Ordinance No. 964 (pertaining to the setting of the City Clerk's salary), and all other ordinances or parts of ordinance of said City which are in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Remaining Sections 2 through 5, inclusive, of Ordinance No. 964, shall not be affected by adoption of this Ordinance. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its approval as required by law. The deputy City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published according to Government Code Section 36933. INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of said City Council on the day of , 1996. 1 MOVED, PASSED and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council on the day of , 1996, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: James Conner, Mayor Deputy City Clerk CERTIFICATION I, LAURIE MORA, Deputy City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. duly adopted by the said City Council of the City of San Jacinto, at a regular meeting thereof held the day of , 1996 WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of , 1996. LAURIE MORA 2 Staff Report TO: Honorable Mayor & Councilmembers FROM: Les Evans, Director of Public Works via: Lyle W. Alberg, Interim City Manager DATE: March 19, 1996 RE: PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR RAMONA BOULEVARD BETWEEN CHASE STREET & POTTER ROAD Recommendation: Direct staff to prepare cost estimates for installation of reflective center line delineation and installation of flashing lights warning of cross -traffic ahead on Ramona Boulevard between Potter Road and Chase Street. Background: Over the past three years, there has been a disturbing pattern of accidents on Ramona Boulevard between Chase Street and Potter Road. A high percentage of the incidents have been due to loss of control of the vehicle and hitting a stationary object or crossing the center line. Accidents recorded over the past few years include an intersection accident at Potter Road, an intersection accident at Chase Street, ahead -on collision near Wind Song, a side -swipe one half mile west of Potter Road, a car driving into the drainage ditch west of Potter, a collision with a power pole near Potter Road and a fatality involving a loss of control and collision with the block wall on the north side of Ramona Boulevard, east of Wind Song. The seriousness of some of the accidents may have been related to the speed of the vehicles involved. Justifiably, the adjacent homeowners have requested that the City take action to reduce speeds on this section of road. The posted speed limit on Ramona Boulevard between Sanderson Avenue and State Street is 45 MPH. Although City staff could re-evaluate the legal speed in this area, State law is very specific on how speed limits must be determined and staff doubts that re- evaluation would result in a lower posted speed. A group of homeowners has suggested the City install STOP signs on Ramona Boulevard at either Potter Road or Wind Song Drive to force vehicles to stop and, therefore, reduce speeds, Although this approach to speed reduction will have an effect, the lower speeds will be evident only within a few hundred feet of the intersection. Staff Report/Traffic Analysis March 19, 1996 Page Two Studies have shown that motorists will accelerate to their previous speed after stopping at a traffic signal or STOP sign. More significantly, the installation of STOP signs along Ramona Boulevard will almost certainly increase the number of intersection accidents where the STOP signs are placed. Placement of STOP signs on high speed, low traffic volume roads is not recommended. The "unexpected" STOP sign is often missed by the driver who is only an occasional user of the road. If the City Council wants to install STOP signs along Ramona Boulevard, they should be preceded by appropriate permanently mounted flashing lights which overhang the roadway and are designed by a traffic engineer. Since the cause of the most serious accidents in this area appears to be inattention, the City Council may wish to consider the following: 1. Installation of reflective delineation along the center line of the street to minimize the chance of an inattentive driver crossing the center line. Installing flashing warning lights for eastbound traffic, warning of cross -traffic ahead. 1 ... r g .• 5, / • '1, ar , .‘" ...' g,... ay. ,..... wa... .... +.• ,s.. ... ..., fis— .., • 0.1 • ---itt__' _. _ ......r. ri ,_ •• a e • e• ,ee, fol . —o- . cor. 4.1- , ar I LiVa • . t % 0, • ... t ° 1 . .... ....... _ _ _ , I x • 4. IO 4 , sNes:,, ;11,... 04 ...0 eg.r 4. • -,,:•• es, 0... .......1.jral N. --ln.t.r: 1 4. ----d- -.. - - ..f. 211\Al L tiVaj ' i, ... ,,,„ , -7- I , .11 '.. .!... _ 8. __ 4. ate .. .0 -.VP eatt .. .1 .8 4,- .‘a, .--`," ..r.' 432 •oo i 3' FUND General (0101 Title 1116 Grant 1011, Workers' Comp. 1018) Equip. Rep!acenenl (019, L'abiloy Insurance 10201 Gas Tar 10211 Measure A (022, Traffic Safety 1024) LLMD (025) Parks Devel. (028) C68G 10291 Pkwy. 00ce1. 1032/ CFD #1 Pvsllc Safety (0351 CFD #2 Pupae Safety 10361 CFD #3 PUEe Safety (037, Underground Utilities 10381 Flood Control (039) Traffic Signal. 1041i AD87-1 Debt Svc. 1042/ 4094.1 Debt Svc. (043) CFD #1 Dept Svc, 10441 CFD #2 Debt Svc, 10461 Water 1050( Water Capita (051: Sewer (055) Asset Forlenure 10511 1/245 Sales Tax (062) AOM2 1053. Recycling Trust (0661 Fire %oganon 1067) '481600 Cap. Implov, 1073-077) CFD #1 Capital 10801 AD94(1 Calata11061! S.J. Unified Trust 1089) SUB -TOTAL CITY FUNDS RDA Soboba Proect (0911 RDA Soboba Debt Svc. (092) RDA Soboba Lo-Mod (094) RDA 5. J. Project 1096r RDA 5. J. Debt Svc. (097) RDA 5. J. Lo'l.'Sd 1099i SUB -TOTAL RDA FUNDS TOTAL FUND BALANCE ESTIMATED 7l1 /95 REVENUE CITY OF SAN JACINTO FUND BALANCE ANALYSIS MIDYEAR REVIEW 1995-96 FISCAL YEAR BUDGET MIDYEAR REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS 02/20:96 TRANSFERS IN IDUT? ESTIMATED EXPENSES MIDYEAR EXPENSE ADJUSTMENTS 02/20:96 TOTAL ESTIMATED FUND BALANCE 6/30:96 $ 293,952 $ 3,505,549 $ 7,006 + (340,4411 $ - + 1106.8521 5 5 1608,4181 $ 122,024 $ 440,063 466,218 $ 571,562 + 7,579 5 17,485 156,144) 5 664,180 150.061 50,305 S 599,946 $ 223,550 19,305 5 135,3241 5 12,259 5 10,431 5 47,349 5 (17,3551 5 91,239 • 236,708 0 10,660 5 1.256,403 $ 72,435 523,073 $ 217,700 1549,9921 $ 30,000 5 145,991 5 93,321 - 5 3,073,650 5 2,242,704 154,0831 $ 1,188.533 • 369,568 2.800 752,230 $ 215,185 5 (85,5941 5 50,000 (5,722, 82.000 5 66,059 5 28,435 5 57,803 s 330.000 $ 54,227 5 36.677 $ 399,187 5 49,239 $ 1.140,361 5 15,500 5 267,844 $ 1,500 5 703,892 $ (58,2271 s 5 5 5 1,429,690 5 4,895,364 5 7,006 5 149,152 115.973 5 275,973 (485,1361 5 115,000 5 :17,3501 5 745.000 5 (19,0641 190,8801 5 608 293 $ 1118481 5 599,94'6 (13,794) 5 200.000 18.8231 5 3.436 141769) $ 5,585 195,5111 5 5,728 111,946f $ - (19.0001 5 72,000 (32,858, 5 240,000 5 15.000 (1,500, 5 77,510 (33,735' $ 2,225.003 (133,4391 $ 965,104 5 5 220,000 18:3700) 1 109,948 $ '50.000) 5 5 76,545 i25.000) 5 i44.6921 5 329, 542 13.6061 5 119,972) 5 50,0(10 17500) 5 445, COO (4.500, 5 175,000 300,000 5 64,071 5 211,529 5 (489,593) 5 (105,852, 6 1700,41 BI 2,725 (30,2741 2,725 272,765 2,725 5 (34,062) 204,510 5 32,061 5 (35.3241 10,431 17.3551 235,500 237,838 468 715 $ i534,992, $ 159,302 3,057,611 30,270 5 25,637 5 152,3130 2,725 5 174,040 5 (35,594) (317) 5 69.503 2,725 5 61,843 87,298 5 378,454 703,381 5 91.844 5 1,033,892 $ 7,895,825 $ 10,764,935 S (58,227) 591,037 5 72,550,335 5 26.775 5 2.500 289,209 5 200616 4,830 0 47,040 652,165 5 130,000 530,968 5 1,197,372 1,334,199 $ 051,858 $ 47,511 5 (95,3101 (51,0601 5 73.821 5 (525,000) 5 (68,4021 $ 64.000 52,826 5 5 1-018„037 $ 5 433.360 5 1,974.626 a 107,956 5 6.535,269 2,725 2,725 16,000 12,786 141,683 45,224 779,900 106.949 5 30048,136 5 2,429,386 5 639,320/ 5 3532,849 21.450 1,286,528 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS 5 10,943,961 5 13.194,321 5 "A81600 Capital Improvement Fund Detail Capital Improvement 1073, 5 17,430 Car Fool Mmgat,on 1074) 5 108,769 Local Transportaupn (075) $ Regiona) Trenspmtat-.un 10761 $ Fubr'c Euildinga 1077) TOTAL CAP. IMP. FUND 399,1 E7 100,447 5 161.437 5 11,104 5 836 35,299 4,821 7.748 535 49,239 5 158,227) I48.2831 a 16,083.184 5 129,416 (E61, 5 (5,458, 5 (4,995, 5 S (8,0231 5 50,000 (635; 5 5 (19.972'. 5 50.000 5 7,821,897 7.405 $ 138.610 100,273 111 162 )1,004 378.454 **This is an attachment in Appendix E of Agenda Item 8.1 which should have replaced the attachment currently included. Page 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: March 19, 1996 SUBJECT: Agenda Item 7,2 (Annexation 66) Attached is a copy of additional correspondence, received today from the Hegedus family regarding Annexation 66. MAR-1'3-6 !At') rm (0.9(1.1b 1. Stephen!. Hegedus, M.D. Dermatology 750 E. Latham Ave., Suite 3 Hemet, CA 92543 Telephone (MI 658-Z271 Laurie Mora, City Clerk ATTN: Brian McNabb Jim Conner Dear Sirs; Thank you for your invitation to attend tonights City Council Meeting with review of issues on outstanding balances for Annexation 66. Unfortunately we will not be able to come but felt that we can contribute little since this is an issue relating to those people who were property owners at the time of annexation. We had no input into the annexation process and were excluded from any discussions. Any agreement you may have had on fees should be directed to the previous owners with whom you may have had an agreement. When we repossessed the property, there was no known indebtedness registered against the title nor any other written or verbal knowledge on any annexation related indebtedness. Furthermore, we purchased title insurance at the time of repossession. Thank you, Stephen I Hegedus for: Stephen 1. Hegedus Mary Anne Hegedus Alexander A. Hegedus Zenaide Hegedus Agency Selection of Hearing Officer in Civil Service Disciplinary Action Did Not Deprive Employee of Due Process Frank Linney worked as an airport vehicular traffic control officer for the City and County of San Francisco. During the investigation of a lost bracelet, Linney lied to his supervisor about the bracelet's whereabouts. Linney claimed that the bracelet was secure in another employee's tool box when the bracelet was actually in the possession of a friend. Based on Linney's dishonesty, he was suspended for six months without pay. Linney was entitled to a hearing pursuant to the San Francisco City Charter. The hearing officer sustained the charges ainst Linney and upheld his suspension. Linney filed a petition for writ of mandate in the Superior Court claiming that the manner in which the hearing officer was selected deprived him of due process. Linney's petition was denied and he appealed. The Court of Appeal affirmed. The Court held that the Civil Service Commission rules setting forth the procedure by which a hearing officer is to be selected were not violative of 6033 W. Century Blvd. Suite 601 Los Angeles, CA 90045 E-Mail LCFLA@aol.com. (310) 645-6492 Fax 1310) 337-0837 March 1996 Linney's due process rights. The rules provide that the hearing officer shall be under contract to the appointing authority and shall be chosen from one of two sources: (1) organizations which customarily provide hearing officers, such as the American Arbitration Association or State Conciliation Service; or (2) a Civil Service Commission list of hearing officers. To be placed on the list, hearing officers must meet certain criteria, and once placed on the list, employees and employee organizations are given the opportunity to challenge them. The Court held that this procedure did not grant the City unrestricted selection• of a hearing officer. Moreover, Linney failed to utilize the opportunity given to him to challenge the list of hearing officers. In this Issue... Disciplinary Procedure ........... 1 Sex Discrimination 2 Privacy Rights 3 Employment Law 4 Fair Labor Standards Act 5 Retirement .............. 7 Law Enforcement 9 School & Colleges 12 Firm Activities 13 Speaking Engagements ......... 14 Law Offices of iebert, Cassidy .' rierson 49 Stevenson Street Suits 1050 San Francisco, CA 94105 E-Mail LCFSF@aol.com. 1415) 546-6100 Fax 1415) 546-6831 March 1996 2 The Court also rejected Linney's argument that the hearing officer could not be impartial because the City had the sole responsibility for selecting and paying him. Linney claimed that the hearing officer had a financial interest in deciding the case in favor of the employer. The rules provided Linney with a mechanism to challenge the competence of the hearing officer before the hearing. Linney failed to utilize this procedure. The Court held that due process does not require absolute impartiality - only a reasonably impartial, noninvolved hearing officer. The test is whether there is prejudice against a particular party sufficient enough to impair the hearing officer's impartiality so that it appears probable that a fair hearing cannot be held. Bias and prejudice must be clearly established. The Court held that Linney failed to present any facts supporting his claim that the hearing officer was biased. In addition, nothing indicated that the hearing officer had a personal financial stake in the matter or harbored any animosity toward Linney. Parenthetically, the Court noted that while in this instance the application of the City's procedure complied with due process, as a general rule some form of mutual selection procedure is preferable. Significance: Most agencies that utilize a procedure that calls for a hearing officer or arbitrator to adjudicate disciplinary appeals provide for some form of mutual selection. If your agency's procedure leaves the decision exclusively to the agency, the impartiality of the hearing officer could be challenged as in this case. While this case will help your agency to defend such a procedure as being consistent with due process, there is some risk inherent in such a procedure. Linney v. Turpen, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1403 (February 9, 1996). SEX DISC'_ MINATION Supervisor's Preferential Treatment of Employee With Whom He is Romantically Involved Does Not Support Fellow Employee's Claim o Discrimination The Califomia Court of Appeal has refused to recognize a new type of employment discrimination based solely on a supervisor's preferential treatment of an employee with whom the supervisor is romantirally involved. Karen Proksel worked as a secretary and office manager for attorney Richard Gattis. Sherry Burton also worked for Gattis as a word processor. Proksel noticed behavior between Gattis and Burton which led her to believe that Gattis was romantically interested in Burton. Proksel observed Gattis looking down Burton's low cut blouses, following Burton after she left work, and telling Burton she was beautiful. Burton was given a larger year end bonus than other employees and a more valuable Christmas gift. About a year later, Gattis separated from his wife. Gattis' wife told Proksel that she thought he was having an affair with Burton. Proksel then observed Burton blowing Gattis a kiss at work. Proksel told Gattis' wife what she had observed and when Gattis found out, he terminated her. Proksel brought suit against Gattis alleging various causes of action, including sex discrimination. The trial court rlicmissed Proksel's lawsuit and she appealed. The Court of Appeal affirmed. Liebert, Cassidy do Frierson March 1996 3 The Court held that while office romances may create problems for employers and may be relevant in a sexual harassment case, preferential treatment of paramours is not in itself actionable by other employees. Other than favoritism of Burton, Proksel did not allege any other acts of discrimination or harassment. She did not allege that Gattis led employees to believe that they could obtain favorable treatment if they became romantically involved with him, nor did she allege that the affair between Gattis and Burton created a hostile work environment. The Court held that where there is no conduct other than favoritism toward a paramour, no liability for sexual harassment or discrimination exists. The Court held that it would be both impracticable and unwarranted for the courts to assume a generalized police power over intimate consensual relationship between co -employees. Therefore, a romantic relationship between a supervisor and an employee does not, without more, give rise to a claim of sexual discrimination or harassment. Proksel v. Gattis, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 905 (January 30, 1996). Supreme Court Denies Review of Case Upholding City Policy of Screening Job Applicants Based on Off -Duty Smoking The United States Supreme Court has denied review of a case addressing off -the - job smoking as part of a screening process for selecting new employees. The effect of the Court's refusal to hear the case is to let stand a decision of Florida's highest court upholding a City's policy requiring all job applicants to sign an affidavit stating that they have not used tobacco products for one year before applying for the job. Arlene Kurtz applied for a job as a clerk typist with the City of North Miami, Florida. Kurtz had been a smoker for 30 years who had tried without success to quit smoking. Although Kurtz claimed that as a condition of employment she would abide by any reasonable restriction while on duty or where her smoking would affect fellow employees or others, she was not hired. In support of its policy, the City contended that smokers pose a risk of higher health costs than non-smokers. Kurtz brought suit against the City claiming that the City's policy interfered with an aspect of her life in which she claimed she had a legitimate expectation of privacy. Florida's highest court upheld the City's policy. Kurtz v. North Miami, Florida, Case No. 95-545 (January 8, 1996). This Client Update is prepared monthly for the benefit of the clients of Liebert, Cassidy & Frierson. The information in this Client Update should not be acted on without professional advice. 01996 Liebert, Cassidy & Frierson March 1996 EMPLO ENT LAW Terminated Employee May State a Valid Cause of Action Against Employer for Having Fraudulently Induced Him to Accept the Position The California Supreme Court has held that a terminated employee may state a valid cause of action for fraudulent inducement of employment contract against his or her employer, and seek tort damages for the costs of uprooting his or her family, relocation expenses, loss of job security and income. Andrew Lazar lived in New York and was the president of a family -owned business for which he had worked for almost twenty years. Rykoff- Sexton, Inc. began intensively recruiting Lazar to come work as its West Coast general manager in Los Angeles. Lazar told Rykoff that he was concerned about relocating his family and his job security in Los Angeles. Rykoff represented to Lazar that he would be employed by Rykoff so long as he performed his job and that he would enjoy continued advancement within the organization. Rykoff further represented that the company was very strong financially and anticipated solid growth and a stable, profitable future. Rykoff offered to pay Lazar more than he was making in New York. In actuality, however, Rykoff had just experienced its worst economic performance in recent history and the company's financial outlook was not good. Rykoff was also planning a merger which would result in the elimination of Jazar's position. Nevertheless, based on Rykoffs representations, Lazar accepted the position with Rykoff, bought a house in California, and moved his family to Los Angeles. Lazar performed his job with Rykoff in an exemplary manner. Two years later, Lazar was terminated as an alleged result of a reorganization. Lazar brought suit against Rykoff, alleging various claims, including fraud. The trial court dismissed Lazar's fraud claim. Lazar appealed, and first the'i Court of Appeal and then the California Supreme Court reversed in favor of Lazar. The Court held that Lazar could validly sustain a cause of action and recover damages for fraudulent inducement of an employment contract. An action for promissory fraud exists where a defendant fraudulently induces the plaintiff to enter into a contract. The Court held that Rykoff's representations, which were knowingly false and upon which Lazar reasonable relied by coming to work in California, constituted promissory fraud for which Rykoff could be held liable. In so holding, the Court distinguished a previous case in which the Court held that an at -will employee could not sustain a cause of action for fraud based on a misrepresentation used to effect the employee's termination. (Hunter v. Up -Right, Inc., 6 Ca1.4th 1174 (1993).) Here, Rykoffs misrepresentations were not aimed at effecting Lazar's termination but rather at inducing him to, accept Rykoffs offer of employment. In the case of a termination, the employee cannot be deemed to have relied to his/her detriment on the employer's misrepresentation because the employer merely employed a falsehood to do what it otherwise could have accomplished directly as the employer has the power to terminate its at -will employees. In this case, Rykoffs misrepresentations were not made in the course of Lazar's termination. Thus, Lazar could sustain a claim against Rykoff for fraudulent inducement of an employment contract. The Court further held that I .war could recover tort damages sustained as a result of Rykoffs fraud, including the costs of uprooting his family, expenses incurred in relocating, and the loss of security and income associated with his former employment in New York. Lazar v. Superior Court, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 937 (January 31, 1996). L°ebert, Cassidy & Frierson March 1996 Time Spent On -Call By Fire Investigators Held Not Compensable Under the Fair Labor Standards Act A federal district court in Nebraska has held that time spent on -call by fire investigators was not compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), because their time on -call was not significantly restricted and was thus, not principally devoted for the benefit of the City. NI NI IS El If ea El BB 0 Fire investigators for the City of Omaha are required to be spend time on -call but such time is not credited towards overtime. While on -call, the fire investigators are required to proceed to the scene of a fire when summoned. The investigators are not required to report in uniform. As part of their on -call status, the investigators are not restricted to their place of residence, but must only be within range of their pagers. While the investigators are not required to remain at their residences while on -call, they are required to take their city vehicles if they leave their residences, and other family members are required to ride in a separate vehicle. The investigators are also not allowed to drink alcohol while on -call. Other City employees who are required to serve on -call testified that they did not feel their free time had been significantly restricted by the on -call requirements. In addition, employees who wanted to travel beyond the pager's reach or engage in activities that interfered with their on -call duties, are generally able to informally swap on -call assignments with other employees with little difficulty. The fire investigators brought suit ainst the City, claiming that they are entitled to be duty and during working hours if needed. The City paid overtime for their on -call time under the FLSA. Federal regulations implementing the FLSA provide that on -call time need not be counted as work time unless the restrictions placed . on the use of the employee's time effectively restricts personal pursuits. 29 C.F.R. § 553.221. The Court held that the restrictions on the fire investigators' use of their time while on -call were loose enough that it could not be said that their time is predominantly for the benefit of their employer. Note: Cases challenging on -call policies are becoming more common. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, recently issued two decisions which address these issues: Owen v. Local 169, August 1992 Client Update and Beray v. County of Sonoma, August 1994 Client Update. You should review your on -call policies against the factors discussed in these cases to determine if the employees on -call are sufficiently unrestricted. If on -call time precludes an employee from engaging in personal pursuits, the employee is entitled to be paid for the entire time on -call. This can be extremely expensive. Freyer v. Omaha, Case No. 8:CV93- 00199 (November 29, 1995). Time Spent By City Employees Volunteering as Firefighters During Work Hours is Compensable Under the Fair Labor Standards Act The Department of Labor ("DOL") has issued an Administrative letter ruling which ruled that time spent by City employees called to volunteer as a firefighter during working hours is compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Three City workers employed in the public works and public safety departments, whose job does not relate to firefighting, volunteer as firefighters off - was concerned that the employees' status as 5 7 ®®hart rneeirhi .G Fnarcn" March 1996 6 volunteer firefighters would be jeopardized if they were given paid administrative leave when called out to perform firefighting duties during working hours. The DOL ruled that when employees are called out during regular working hours for public or charitable purposes, they are to be compensated for their time under the FLSA. In addition, the DOL ruled that the fact that the employees will be compensated for firefighting while on -duty, does not effect their status as volunteers with respect to off -duty firefighting. ALR (dated April 9, 1995). Firefighters Cross -Trained as Emergency Medical Service Employees May Qualify for Partial Overtime + Exemption Under Section 7(k) The Department of Labor has issued an administrative letter ruling providing that firefighters who are cross -trained as emergency medical service ("EMS") employees may qualify for the partial overtime exemption under Section 7(k) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Section 7(k) of the FLSA provides a partial overtime exemption for fire protection and law enforcement personnel employed by public agencies. (29 C.F.R. § 553.201.) The tens "any employee ... in fire protection activities" refers to any employee (1) who is employed by an organized fire department or fire protection district (2) who has been trained to the extent required by state statute or local ordinance; (3) who has the legal authority and responsibility to engage in the prevention, control or extinguishment of a fire of any type; and (4) who performs activities which are required for, and directly concerned with, the prevention, control or extinguishment of fires, including such incidental nonfirefighting functions as housekeeping, equipment maintenance, etc. The term also includes rescue and ambulance personnel that form an integral part of the public agency's fire protection activities. (29 C.F.R. §§ 553.210(a) an 553.215.) The DOL had ruled that firefighters who are cross - trained as EMS employees may qualify for exemption under Section 7(k) as fire protection employees principally engaged as firefighters meeting the four tests outlined above, and where the EMS functions they perform meet the tests for ambulance and rescue employees. The DOL ruled that ambulance and rescue activities are incidental to the employee's fire protection duties within the meaning of the fourth test, including any ambulance and rescue activities related to medical emergencies, rather than fires, crime scenes, riots, natural disasters, and accidents. The DOL noted, however, that in these circumstances, the time engaged in ambulance and rescue activities would be considered to be work performed as incident to or in conjunction with the employees' fire protection activities, and would no` count in the 20% limitation on nonexempt work. ALR (dated February 13, 1995). Employer Cannot Rely on Sleep Time Agreement Signed by Employee Under Duress The Department of Labor has issued an administrative letter ruling concluding that a firefighter is not deemed to have agreed to have all sleep time excluded from hours worked by merely continuing to work under a new system instituted by the employer, nor can the employer rely on an agreement signed by the employee under duress. In order for an agency to be able to exclude sleep time from hours worked for firefighters, there must be an express or implied agreement between the agency and employee association. In addition, sleep time may not be excluded unless the firefighters have at least five hours of uninterrupted sleep and> are on shift for more than 24 hours. Lieber:, Cassidy & Frierson i March 1996 7 In this matter, an agency unilaterally expanded its employees' shifts to 24 hours and 15 minutes without any additional pay for the 15 minutes, and were told that from that time forward their sleep time will be excluded from hours worked. The employees continued in their employment, both with and without protest. The DOL ruled that an implied a eement to exclude sleep time cannot come into existence merely because employees continue to work under a new system instituted by the employer. This is especially true if employees affirmatively protest the employer's actions and object to the new policy. In addition, an employer cannot rely on an agreement sired by the employee under duress. ALR (dated January 17, 1995). TIREMENT Proposition 162 Giving Public Retirement Boards Broad Authority Does Not Eliminate Judicial Review of Retirement Board Decisions The California Court of Appeal has held that Proposition 162, which amended the California Constitution to give public retirement boards plenary authority and fiduciary responsibility for investment of moneys and administration of the system, did not insulate decisions of retirement boards from judicial review. 110 Protosition 162 Alfred Singh was employed by the Imperial County Health Department. As part of his job, Singh was required to perform inspections of swimming pools, food markets, restaurants, etc., and regularly used his private truck to perform these duties. Singh's supervisors were aware of Singh's use of his personal truck in the conduct of his business for the County. In fact, Singh's truck was equipped with a County radio and County tool box. Sometimes Singh was required to proceed directly from home to a work site. In addition, Singh was part of an emergency response team and was on call 24 hours a day. One morning, Singh left home in his personal truck to go to the office. On his way to work, Singh was injured in a car accident. Due to the extent of his injuries, Singh applied for a service -connected disability retirement. The Board of Retirement of the Imperial County Employees' Retirement System denied Singh's application for a disability retirement based on its finding that Singh's car accident was not in the course of his employment with the County. After exhausting his administrative remedies to no avail, Singh sought court review of the Board's decision. Singh claimed that his accident fell within an exception to the "going -and -coming" rule which would normally preclude an employee from being considered to be in the course of his employment while proceeding to work from home or to home from work since Singh's use of his own truck provided a benefit to his employer. The Board did not dispute Singh's factual argument but merely claimed that Proposition 162, which was passed in 1992, gave the Board plenary authority to determine Singh's retirement eligibility, and that the exercise of this plenary power could not be overturned by the courts. The trial court disagreed with the Board's contention and reversed the Board's decision. The Board appealed, and the Court of Appeal affirmed. Proposition 162, known as "The California Pension Protection Act of 1992", amended Article XVI, Section 17, of the California Constitution and gave public retirement boards "plenary authority and fiduciary responsibility for investment of moneys and administration of the system...." The Court interpreted the Board's contention as essentially claiming that the use of the word "plenary" in Proposition 162 effectively repeals the well - established rules by which local agency Lieberr, Cassidy do Frierson March 1996 8 decisions are reviewed in the superior courts via petition for writ of mandate pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure § 1094.5. The Court recogni7Pd that the repeal of a statute by implication is not favored and is only recognized when potentially conflicting statutes cannot be harmonized. This was not the case here. Thus, the Court refused to accept the Board's contention that Proposition 162 immnni7es the decision of a retirement board from judicial review as such a reading would lead to absurd results. Singh v. Board of Retirement of the Imperial County Employee? Retirement System, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 545 (January 18, 1996). Taxpayers Cannot Sustain Action Against County Challenging the Calculation of County Employee Retirement Benefits By Retirement Board The California Court of Appeal has held that in light of the law which vests sole authority for administering a county retirement system in a board of retirement, with specific authority to determine what qualifies as retirement -eligible compensation, taxpayers could not sustain an action against the County for allegedly failing to comply with statutory procedural requirements prior to implementation of a policy allowing the inclusion of flex benefits payments in retirement -eligible compensation. The County of Los Angeles has flexible benefit plans for its employees which provide for additional remuneration in either cash or the payment of certain benefits, such as health, dental, life or disability insurance. In 1990, the Los Angeles County Employees' Retirement Association ("LACERA") staff began allowing County flexible benefit plan contributions to be included within "compensation earnable" for purposes of calculating retirement benefits, which has the effect of increasing future retirement benefit payments for eligible p- icipating County employees. A year later, the Los Angeles Retirement Board ("Board") adopted a formal resolution ratifying this policy. Two taxpayer groups - the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and the Los Angeles Taxpayers Association ("taxpayers') - brought suit against the County, the Board and LACERA, claiming that the inclusion of flex benefits in the computation of compensation earnable for purposes of calculating retirement benefits for public employees was unlawful. All three defendants filed for dismissals of the taxpayers' action, which the trial court granted. The taxpayers appealed, and the Court of Appeal affirmed. The taxpayers claimed that the County's decision to include flex benefits in retirement -eligible compensation, was in violation of Government Code § 7507, which requires such decision to be preceded by an actuarial study and public hearings. However, the Court held that LACERA and the Board, and not the County, made the decision to include flex benefits as retirement -eligible compensation. Therefore, the County could not be liable for any potential statutory violations arising out of the adoption of the policy. In addition, pursuant to the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, Govemment Code §§ 31450 et seq., ("CERL"), the sole authority for administering the retirement system is in the Board of Retirement, with specific authority to determine which elements of compensation should be included in the calculation of compensation earnable. CERL also provides that a county Board of Retirement does not act as an = ._ent for the county, but as an independent entity. Thus, neither LACERA nor the Board were bound by the procedural requirements of Section 7507. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 723 (January 24, 1996). Liebert, Cassidy do Frierson March 1996 9 LAW ENFORCEMENT Sheriffs Department's Rule Prohibiting Employees From Associating With Criminals is Constitutional The California Court of Appeal has upheld the termination of a deputy sheriff for violating a departmental rule prohibiting employees from associating with criminals where such association would be detrimental to the image of the Department, based on the Court's finding that the rule is not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad. Rudolfo Arellanes was a deputy sheriff for the County of Los Angeles. Arellanes was identified as a "contact" person wl-thin the Sheriffs Department by a criminal arrested for conspiracy to commit murder during a negotiated plea bargain. Arellanes was alleged to have provided information from the Department's computers for use in an extortion scheme. These allegations were investigated and it was discovered that Arellanes had contact with several other suspected criminals. As part of its internal investigation of Arellanes, the Department had the arrestee who had first identified Arellanes as a "contact" person within the Department, make contact with Arellanes and attempt to gain information from him. Arellanes had several telephone conversations with this person and even met him once in person. During this meeting, the arrestee told Arellanes that he had an outstanding warrant for his arrest. He also asked Arellanes to "check throngh the grapevine" to see if anyone had put a contract out for his life. At no time did Arellanes report his contacts with the arrestee to his supervisors. Arellanes was eventually terminated for violating departmental rules, including a rule prohibiting deputies from knowingly maintaining a personal association with persons under criminal investigation or indictment and/or who have an open and notorious reputation in the community for criminal activity where such association would be detrimental to the image of the Department. Arellanes had been previously disciplined for having improper contacts with an inmate informant. Arellanes appealed his termination to the Civil Service Commission, which adopted the hearing officer's recommendation to uphold his termination. Arellanes then sought review of his termination in court by filing a petition for writ of mandate to compel the Commission to vacate its decision.. The trial court denied Arellanes petition and he appealed. The Court of Appeal affirmed. The Court held that the Department's rule prohibiting its employees from associating with criminals is not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad. Arellanes claimed that the rule infringed his First Amendment right of freedom of association. The Court noted, however, that not all forms of association are protected by the First Amendment. The decision to enter into and maintain intimate interpersonal relationships is not protected by the First Amendment, although it is protected by the fundamental elements of personal liberty. The Court held that the Department's rule does not limit activities protected by the First Amendment but only one's ability to maintain intimate interpersonal relationships. Therefore, the Department's rule did not impermissibly infringe on Arellanes' First Amendment rights. Arellanes further claimed that the rule failed to warn him that his contacts with the arrestee would qualify as a violation of the rule. The Court, however, held that the rule provides a sufficiently specific standard against which the conduct of a police officer could be judged. The Court held that police officers will normally be able to determine what kind of conduct will be detrimental to the image of the Department. The. .conversations Lieberr, Cassidy & Frierson March 1996 10 between Arellanes and the arrestee should have indicated to Arellanes that his continued association with the arrestee would likely be detrimental to the image of the Department. However, Arellanes continued his association with the arrestee, never reporting his contacts to his supervisors. Therefore, Arellanes' termination was proper. Arellanes v. Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 541 (January 18, 1996). Termination of Probationary Police Officer for Developing Relationship With Arrestee Upheld The California Court of Appeal has upheld the termination of a probationary police officer for developing a relationship with an arrestee. Jose Riveros was a probationary member of the Los Angeles Police Department. Riveros arrested Heather Stupnik, an eighteen year old drug addict, for drug possession. During the arrest, Riveros gave Stupnik his business card and told her to call if she needed help. Riveros claimed that he did this because he thought he was required to do so. Stupnik began calling Riveros at work. Stupnik then claims that Riveros became flirtatious with her and they agreed to meet. Stupnik claims that they went to a motel room where they had sex. Riveros does not deny meeting Stupnik and going to a motel room with her, but denies having sex with her. Riveros claims that he was trying to help Stupnik with her drug problems. When Stupnik began calling Riveros at home, he changed his home telephone number and told Stupnik that he was going to file a complaint about her harassing telephone calls. Stupnik then begin writing him letters. The letters were found by Stupnik's husband who demanded that she file a complaint against Riveros. After an investigation into Stupnik's complaint, Riveros was recommended for a 15-day suspension. After learning that Stupnik was a drug user, however, another Captain recommended that Riveros be terminated. In the absence of Chief of Police Willie Williams, the acting Chief of Police decided to suspend Riveros for 22 days. After being served with the suspension papers, Riveros went to San Francisco to begin a part-time job while suspended. While Riveros was in San Francisco, Chief Williams overturned the suspension and terminated him. When Riveros returned from San Francisco four days later, he found a notice of termination posted to his door. Riveros appealed his termination. At the hearing, which was described as a `liberty interest" hearing, Riveros called 15 witnesses and the City called none. The hearing officer recommended that the Chief reevaluate the termination. The Chief, however, sustained Riveros' termination and submitted his reasons for doing so to the Board of Civil Service Commissioners. Riveros then filed an appeal to the Board. The Board refused to hear his appeal, however, because he was still on probation. Riveros then filed apetition for writ of mandate in the Superior Court seeking reinstatement. The trial court denied the petition, and Riveros appealed. The Court of Appeal affirmed. The City Charter provides that a probationary employee may be terminated if the appointing authority submits the reasons for termination in writing to the Board prior to the expiration of the officer's probationary period. Riveros claimed that Chief Williams' final decision to terminate him was ineffective because it was not sent to the Board of Civil Service Commissioners until just shortly after his probationary period had expired. Riveros claimed that he therefore had become a member of the classified civil service. However, a Board rule defining the probationary period states that in the eventa probationary officer is absent in excess of seven calendar days in the aggregate, except for vacation or time off for Lieber:, Cassidy do Frierson March 1996 overtime, the officer's probationary period shall be extended by the entire period missed. In this case, Riveros' notice of termination specifically stated that his probationary period may be extended as a result of absences relating to his discipline. Moreover, the Court held that to hold otherwise would "tie the Department's hands in terminating such officers involved in some misconduct shortly before their probationary term expires." Therefore, the Court held that Riveros was still a probationary employee at the time of Chief William's final order to terminate him. The Court further held that while the Chief must have some reason for firing a probationary officer supported by some evidence, he or she still possesses the essential powers of probationary evaluation. The Court held that the Chiefs asserted reason for firing Riveros - for developing an off -duty relationship with an arrestee - was amply supported by the evidence. Moreover, the Court upheld the Chiefs authority to override the Captain's initial decision to suspend Riveros. The Court held that this power is consistent with the broad authority granted the Chief in dealing with probationary officers. To hold otherwise would unduly restrict those powers. The Court also found that Riveros' "liberty interest" bearing satisfied Section 3304 of the Peace Officers' Procedural Bill of Rights Act. Because Riveros was a probationary employee, he was entitled to a "name clearing" appeal as provided in Section 3304. Section 3304 does not entitle Riveros to a pretermination hearing at which the Department must produce substantial evidence to support the reasons for his termination. Section 3304 only establishes the right to a post -termination appeal hearing of some kind, which Riveros was afforded. Riveros v. City of Los Angeles, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 715 (January 24, 1996). Fifth Amendment Does Not Preclude Production of Officers' Statements in Internal Affairs Investigation Reports Sought Via Grand Jury Subpoena The United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, has held that the Fifth Amendment does not provide protection from the production of police officers' statements contained in internal affairs investigation reports pursuant to a grand jury subpoena. In connection with an investigation into alleged civil rights violations committed by the Huntington Beach Police Department, the federal grand jury subpoenaed internal affairs investigation reports from the Department, which included statements made by police officers during internal affairs investigations. The Department sou •ht to have the subpoenas quashed, claiming that production of officers' statements violated their Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination. The trial court denied the Department's motion and upheld the issuance of the subpoenas. The Department appealed, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. The Court held that the Fifth Amendment only prohibits the improper use of statements and not the statements' production. A claim of Fifth Amendment privilege is usually made at the time a statement is made and most often occurs when a witness is asked a question upon arrest, in a deposition, or in the witness stand at trial. In those settings, the privilege applies to the giving or obtaining of a statement. In this case, however, the officers' statements were already made and were compelled under threat of loss of employment. Once a statement is made under compulsion, the Fifth Amendment protects only against the improper use of the statements by employing such procedures as having the statements screened by the investigating - ency to redact privileged testimony prior to production, and by requiring the ovemment to prove its evidence through an independent source. Such statements, however, are not privileged from production pursuant to subpoena. In re Grand Jury Subpoena, Huntington Beach Police Dept., 96 Daily Journal 1030 (February 1, 1996). 11 Liebert, Cassidy do Frierson March 1996 12 Disputed Issue of Material Fact Precludes Finding of Qualified Immunity For Police Officers in Civil Rights Action The United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, has held that an issue of material fact precluded the finding of qualified immunity for police cfficers in a civil rights lawsuit. Brenda Carrell accepted a ride home from a Halloween party with a man who allegedly raped her in his car. After Carrell was able to flee the car, police officers saw Carrell running down the middle of the street. The officers tried to pull Carrell over and told her to get out of the road. Carrell responded with shouts of profanity, attempted to elude the police, and ran back into the street. The officers arrested Carnell for disorderly conduct. Carnell claims she told the police she had just been raped and that they failed to seek medical treatment for her. The officers deny that Carrell told them she had been raped. Carrell brought suit against the officers under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging various constitutional violations. The officers sought to have the case against them dismissed, claiming they were entitled to qualified immunity. The trial court refused to dismiss the case based on the disputed fact as to whether Carnell told the officers she had been raped. The officers appealed, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. An officer sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for his or her alleged misconduct is entitled to qualified immunity if the law governing the officer's conduct was clearly established, and a reasonable officer would have believed his or her conduct was lawful. The Court held that the law governing the rights of persons in police custody to receive medical treatment under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Eight Amendment's prescription against cruel and unusual treatment was clearly established. However, the Court held that whether Carnell told the officers that she had been raped was a disputed issue of material fact. Thus, the Court could not decide whether a reasonable officer could have believed the officers' conduct was iawful, thereby precluding a decision as to whether the officers were entitled to qualified immunity. Carnell v. Grimm, et al., 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 982 (January 31, 1996). SCHOOLS &. COLLEGES District's Decision to Replace School Psychologists with Independent Contractors Upheld Because The Service Ls to be Provided in a Different Manner The California Court of Appeal has held that a school district's decision to replace three elementary school psychologists with an administrative psychologist and independen contractor psychologists due to financial constraints was a valid reduction or discontinuation of a "particular kind of service" pursuant to Education Code § 44955. As part of a program to cut $1.1 million from its budget for the 1993-94 school year, the Board of Trustees for the Alta Loma School District decided to reduce or eliminate 14 full-time positions. The District. notified Peter Gallup and fillet Parsons, both elementary school psychologists, that their services would not be required for the iiebert, sidy & Frierson March 1996 1993-94 school year. Fred Quici, another school psychologist with less seniority than Gallup, was retained in an administrative capacity. Independent contractors were then to be used for psychological testing and assessment services. The District estimated that the use of independent psychologists would save the District $47,000. Gallup appealed his dismissal which the Board upheld. Gallup filed a petition for writ of mandate seeking review of his termination in the Superior Court. The trial court reversed Gallup's termination and ordered the District to reinstate him with back pay and benefits. The District appealed and the Court of Appeal affirmed. Education Code § 44955 allows a school district to terminate a permanent, certificated employee if the employee's "particular kind of service is to be reduced or discontinued." This authorization extends to the District's continuance of the service formerly provided by the terminated employee if the continued service is performed or provided in a different manner. The Court held that the undisputed evidence showed that the independent psychologists would not perform the services in the same manner as the employee -psychologists had provided. The Court held that the elimination of the employee -psychologists' positions resulting in a savings of $47,000 was reasonable. Therefore, Gallup's termination was lawful. Significance: The most significant fact in this case was that the Court found that the independent contractor psychologists would provide psychologist services in a different ynner than provided by District psychologists who were laid off. There have been several appellate decisions where districts have attempted to eliminate positions and use independent contractors where the Court held that the independent contractors did not perform the service in a different manner. In those cases, the layoffs were improper. Gallup v. Alta Loma School District Board of Trustees, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 908 (January 30, 1996). FI ACT TIES CONSORTIUM WORKSHOPS March 4 Napa/Solano/Yolo ERC, "Write It Right," Davis, Larry Frierson March 5 Napa/Solano/Yolo ERC, "Write It Right," Napa, Larry Frierson March 6 NorCal ERC, "ADA/FMLA/Workers' Comp, Disability Retirement: Administering Overlapping Laws," Concord, Peter Brown & Doug Bray March 6 Sonoma/Marin, "Effectively Utilizing Performance Evaluation as a Management/Supervisory Tool" and "Sexual & Other Forms of Harassment," Petaluma, Larry Frierson & Art Hartinger 13 Liebert, Cassidy & Frierson March 1996 March 13 San Joaquin Valley ERC, "A Guide to Labor Negotiations," Tracy, Bruce Barsook March 14 Bay Area ERC, "Effectively Utilizing Performance Evaluation as a Management/Supervisory Tool," Palo Alto, Terry Roemer March 14 Central Coast Personnel Council, "Write It Right," Santa Barbara County Education Office Auditorium, Reg Murphy March 20 Central Coast ERC, "Management/Supervisory Rights & Obligations in Employment Relations," Pismo Beach, Reg Murphy March 26 Orange County ERC, "The Three R's for New Supervisors: Realities, Responsibilities & Relationships," Cypress, Reg Murphy March 27 Central Valley ERC, "Management/Supervisory Rights & Obligations in Employee Relations," Visalia, Reg Murphy April 10 Imperial Valley ERC, "The Employee Relations Issues of Downsizing the Organization" and "FLSA Update," Imperial Irrigation District, Bruce Barsook and Peter Brown April 11 NorCal ERC, "A Guide to Labor Negotiations," Concord, Bruce Barsook April 17 Sonoma/Marin ERC, "Management/Supervisory Rights & Obligations in Employment Relations," Petaluma, Reg Murphy April 17 Ventura/Santa Barbara ERC, "ADA/FMLA/Workers' Comp/Disability Retirement: Administering Overlapping Laws," Oxnard, Peter Brown and Doug Bray April 17 Orange County ERC, "Effectively Administering the Discipline Process," Garden Grove, Debra Bray April 25 Monterey Bay ERC, " Administering Labor Agreements, Personnel Rules, and Processing Grievances" and "Employment Discrimination and Affirmative Action: Whats New and What Does It MeanT' Santa Cruz, Bruce Barsook April 25 Central Valley ERC, "Privacy Issues in the Workplace," Madera, Melanie Poturica SP •11 G ENGAGEMENTS March 1 "Fair Labor Standard Act Update," League of California Cities/CSAC, Newport Beach, Art Hartinger March 1 "Fundamentals of Collective Bargaining," Association of California School Administrator. (ACSA) Business Managers Academy (North), Santa Rosa, Reg Murphy 14 Liebers, Cassidy de Frierson I March 1996 I March 6, 13 & 27 March 11 March 13 March 14 March 14 March 14 March 14 March 14 March 15 March 16 March 20 "Guide to Avoiding Harassment Liability in the Workplace," City of Santa Monica, Linda Jenson "Successful FLSA Litigation: A Case Study," National League of Cities Annual Congressional City Conference, Washington, D.C., Art Hartinger "'Role of the Trustee," Inservice program for Board Members of Santa Ynez Valley High School District, Reg Murphy "Legal Update," Association of California Community Colleges Annual Conference, Costa Mesa, Larry Frierson "Reinstate, Accommodate, Rehabilitate, Terminate," CALPELRA 1996 Annual Southern Spring Labor Relations Conference, Lakewood, Peter Brown & Doug Bray of Heisler and Bray "How to Prepare For and Conduct A Workplace Investigation," CALPELRA 1996 Annual Southern Spring Labor Relations Conference, Lakewood, Linda Jenson "Creative Solutions in Negotiations," CALPELRA 1996 Annual Southern Spring Labor Relations Conference, Lakewood, Richard Kreisler "Legal Trends!" CALPELRA 1996 Annual Eouthem Spring Labor Relations Conference, Lakewood, Melanie Poturica "Effective Disciplinary Procedures," ACSA, Classified Leaders Conference, Cal Poly, Pomona, Reg Murphy "School Law," with Bob Fraisse, Assistant Superintendent of Las Virgenes Unified School District, ACSA Principals Academy, Woodland Hills, Bruce Barsook "FMLA and Other Personnel Issues," Novato Fire Protection District, Bruce Barsook March 20 "Workers Compensation," and "Avoiding Discrimination Liability in the Workplace," City of Santa Ana, Doug Bray of Heisler & Bray and Linda Jenson March 21 "Drug and Alcohol Testing in the Schools," California School Employers Association, Costa Mesa, Peter Brown March 21 "ADA/FMLA," International Personnel Management Association (IPMA), Newport Beach, Peter Brown March 23 "School Law," ACSA Principals Academy, Bruce Barsook 15 , March 1996 16 March 26 "Fair Labor Standards Act," City and County of San Francisco, Art Hartinger March 28 "Supervisors' Obligations and Responsibilities," Cities of Palmdale/Lancaster, Bruce Barsook April 11 "Sexual Harassment in the Schools," Beverly Hills School District, Linda Jenson April 16 "Preparation for Interest Arbitration," National Public Employer Labor Relations Association (NPELRA), Clearwater Beach, Florida, John Liebert April 18 "SB 729," Conejo Valley Unified School District, Reg Murphy April 24 "Effectively Utilizing Performance Evaluation As A Management /Supervisory Tool," City of Azusa, Reg Murphy April 25 Chief Instructional Officers of California Community College Districts, "Horror Stories I Have Known - Learning From Our Mistakes," Larry Frierson April 26 "Evaluation & Documentation of Performance of Classified & Certificated Personnel," Allan Hancock College, Reg Murphy Liebert, Cassidy & Frierson Memorandum TO: FROM: DATE: Honorable Mayor & Councilmembers Brian McNabb, Community Development Director March 19, 1996 RE: ANNEXATION 66 PAYMENT - AGENDA ITEM #7.2 In response to our notices sent to Annexation 66 property owners and Coordinating Committee members, I have received two comments, both from committee members. Bob Nichols, in a March 18 phone conversation, indicated that the City should do whatever was necessary to receive the money sooner than later. He suggested some sort of incentive or amnesty program such as the DMV or IRS has offered. Calvin Westra faxed the attached comments. '96-03-18 16:a1 WESTRR DRIF` MS ■ WES-TRA FAMILY TRUST - March 18, 1996 Brian Mc Nahb City of San Jacinto 201 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92383 Dear Brian: This letter is in response to a memo received by the Westra Family regarding notices sent to property owners within the Annexation 66 boundaries. As your well aware, the Westra Family was instrumental in the completion of Annexation 66, as were all the board members. The process was both long and enjoyable. The City of San Jacinto saw a opportunity to expand their boundaries as well as plan for the next century. When the plan was complete, it allowed current agriculture property owners the ability to project growth or relocation to ocher areas. That's something the property owners within the San Bernardino Agriculture Preserve in the Chino -Ontario Valley have been pushing for for years. Currently I am serving on the annexation committee for the Ontario portion of the preserve. We have done some initial studies with a cost projection four times that of Annexation 66. Those property owners who have mixed reactions need to know where they would be if Annexation 66 was not completed. It was their choice to postpone payment of the fees until a later date. The City of San Jacinto cannot be asked to be their bank without some type of compensation. With City and County development fees escalating it was well worth the effort and money for the completion of Annexation 66. Now, I do feel that if a property owner can display undo hardship the City could re- negotiate the fees. But, those guideline should be very stringent. Please forward to the Council my concerns and suggestions. Poat-It' Fax Note i87t oamS// �16 voeM� as a Sincere]y, Cal Westra Westra Family Trust 11023 EUCALYPTUS AVENUE • ONTARIO, CA 11 7C. PHONE: (909) 917•J S2E • FAX: (909) 91J•7745 • TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO:1 I Li CITY OF SAN JACINTO STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development via Lyle W. Alberg, Interim City Manager March 19, 1996 CONSIDERATION OF OPTIONS RELATED TO PAYMENT OF OUTSTANDING ANNEXATION 66 FEES RECOMMENDATION 1. Direct staff to prepare a Resolution creating a 50% forgiveness to the Annexation 66 fees if paid prior to July 1, 1996, and a 25% forgiveness to the Annexation 66 fees if paid prior to January 1, 1997. Direct staff to prepare a notice, to be placed on all properties in the City, notifying owners that prior to development, their property may be subject to development fees. Said fees vary from property to property. Prior to development, the owner should determine from the City, which fees are applicable. BACKGROUND Pursuant to Council direction, a letter was sent to the property owners within Annexation 66 who had outstanding processing fees due. The total number of letters sent were 38, encompassing 2,359.82 acres. The original fee, due by December 31, 1991 was $78.00 per acre. This amount inflates annually by 6%. Additionally, there is a 20% administrative and handling charge. The total amount due during calendar year 1996 is $118.171acre. The City has received three payments in full. This pays off 58 acres. We have also received payments from two property owners owning 120.24 acres and 132.50 acres respectively, as a result of two meetings. The first meeting, which included the Bartel family, Jim Conner and Brian McNabb, resulted in a proposal, for Council consideration, to split the difference between $78.00 and $118.17. The Bartel's want to pay the debt. However, they were surprised by our letter, as the property had been transferred within the family without knowledge of the $78.00 fee being transferred also. The Bartel's have sent a check marked "paid in full" based on the proposal to split the difference. A second meeting was held between Brian McNabb and the Demler Family. This property too had changed hands within the family without knowledge of the outstanding fee It was suggested at this meeting that the compromise mentioned above would be considered by the Council. The Demlers subsequently sent in a check for $78.00/Acre and asked for a waiver of the balance. Staff has not cashed either of these checks pending Council direction. If the Council agrees to a compromise, it must be offered to all properties including the three owners who paid in full. Although there are various options the Council could consider, staff is recommending the Council consider a 50% forgiveness for the balance of Fiscal Year 1995-96, and a 25% forgiveness for the first half of Fiscal Year 1996-97. In the Mayor's letter to the Annexation 66 property owners of January 30, 1996, it was noted that notice of this development fee would be put on the title to each property. After further consideration staff feels that all property owners in the City should be put on notice that they may be subject to developer fees, which vary depending on location in the City. H: \ccrpt-96\A-66 pym t. p ro 26670 Via La Quinta Hemet, CA 92544 February 18, 1996 Jim Conner, Mayor San Jacinto 201 East Main St. San Jacinto, CA 92583 Dear Mr. Conner: CITY C.-1.7-7 " " A 0 F E 1.29f3 COMi i I ENT I am writing in reply to your letter of January 30, 1996 regarding reimbursement of city costs related to Annexation 66. Please note that in 1989 we were not the property owners of the land referred to in the letter. Furthermore we were not part of the group that requested annexation and did not agree to any costs the annexation would require. Our property was at that time owned by someone else. If the city had any agreement with the previous owner the city should contact him and request any money due. Long after the annexation process was completed, we once more became owners of the property. At the time of the repossession, we were assured that there were no liabilities nor any indebtedness against the property or any claims registered against the title. We purchased title insurance at the time of the repossession. After reviewing our records we feel we acted in a proper manner and if the city made a mistake or omission then this must be settled by the city with the previous owner. The city has no right to record a notice of obligation against our title. We ask that the city will not record a notice of obligation against the title and if this has already been completed that it be removed within thirty days of the receipt of this letter. If not then we will have to pursue the matter through legal channels. We are sorry for this misunderstanding. The City of San Jacinto made a mistake at the time of the annexation by not signing a written agreement with the proper landowners at the time of the annexation. The city also failed to file an obligation on the title in a timely manner. The filing would have protected not only the city but all future owners. This is something the city must solve. The city may have the right to settle this dispute with the previous owner but the city has no legal right to pass this obligation to us. Thank you, \ Stephen I Hegedu dlite Mary Anne Hegedus \if Alexander Hegedus • ",e",71414_0(-a--, Alf2V2-61-(A-a-i Zenaida Hegedus TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM NO. / '3 CITY OF SAN JACINTO STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Brian. McNabb, Director of Community Development via Lyle W. Alberg, Interim City. Manager March 19, 1996 APPOINTMENT/STATUS REPORT VACANCIES ON THE FOLLOWING COMMITTEES: 1. Redevelopment Agricultural Advisory Committee 2. Accessibility Appeals Board 3. City Farming Committee 4. Community Preservation Committee RECOMMENDATION 1. Agricultural Advisory Committe 2. Accessibility Appeals Board 3. City Farming Committee 4. Community Preservation Committee Appoint to fill remaining two vacancies Direct staff to proactively seek membership. Receive and file. Establish terms of office for existing members; appoint one alternate; and, direct staff to seek a second alternate. In accordance with State Law, the City Clerk placed an advertisement in the Hemet News providing a notice of committee vacancies for those committees listed above. The following paragraphs describe the current status and provide a recommendation for Council consideration. 1. Redevelopment Agricultural Advisory Board. The Agency is to appoint five members to this board after seeking input from the Riverside County Farm Bureau. The Farm Bureau submitted a list of five to serve on this committee. On March 5th, the Council appointed three members and directed staff to seek additional candidates. We have received one letter of interest from Al Fernandez I1. Mr. Fernandez lives in the Montage Development and teaches at Hemet. High School. To qualify for this committee, the Resolution calls for residency within the Sphere of Influence and involvement in an agricultural activity. Mr. Fernandez meets both criteria, although his involvement in agricultural activity may not have been what was originally envisioned. The Farm Bureau met last week, after the agenda memo was prepared. Other names are supposedly forthcoming from them and may be available prior to the Council meeting. Staff recommends consideration of all names available by the Council meeting and appointment of up to two committee members. 2. Accessibility Appeals Board. This committee is to rule on ADA appeals. State Law requires the committee to consist of two disabled parties, two construction industry related parties, and one at -large party. There is no residency requirement. As of the writing of this report no letters of interest had been received. Staff recommends the Council grant authorization to staff to proactively seek volunteers for this committee. 3. City Farming Committee. This Committee is to mediate farming issues and is to consist of three members of the Neighborhood Preservation Committee and three members of the Agricultural Advisory Committee. This Committee was advertised to let the public know its duties and functions. Two letters of interest were received, both from members of Neighborhood Preservation Committee, Michael Allen and Annette Cortz. There is no further action necessary on this matter as each of the two committees will be appointing three members to serve on the Farming Committee, subject to Council ratification. 4. Community Preservation Committee. This is a five member - two alternate committee with five existing members. The City is seeking to fill the two alternate positions which are now vacant; to appoint the existing members to specific terms of office; and, to appoint the alternates to either a one or two year term. Only one citizen volunteered to serve on this committee. John Palmer Jr. lives in the Heritage Neighborhood, (which is currently unrepresented in this committee.) The committee recommends the Council establish the following term expirations: Gilbert Torres Rich Thomsen Jack O'Brien Annette Cortz Michael Allen February 1, 1998 February 1, 1998 February 1, 1998 February 1, 1997 February 1, 1997 Staff recommends the appointment of John Palmer as an alternate, serving until February 1, 1998. Staff further recommends the Council continue to seek volunteers to fill the other alternate position. H:\ccrpt-96kcomite.upd MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Laurie Mora, Deputy City Clerk DATE: March 19, 1996 SUBJECT: Agenda Item 7.3.2 Attached is a copy of an application for appointment to the Accessibility Appeals Board for your consideration. This application was received today. CITY OF SAN JACINTO 312 E. MAIN STREET SAN JACINTO, CA 92583 COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT fipcc � ss rb L' /' PPEA• s /3c Ai r NAME n,'T-oN ADDRESS 76 ° A R I Es 7 CITY SAN JAC/N To NAME OF COMMITTEE ZIP ci�5�3 HOME PHONE-s`1-76).-3 WORK PHONE E7"r2 E ° WHY ARE YOU INTERESTED IN SERVING ON THIS COMMITTEE? /1 / W/FE 15 A RI ci&_ i-r /-iAc/ 13c=co'- - Au.3.1 r;F= _or PRO E1-15 G-F T /SA/3iF_©. 71-1AU/NF £36.7E For? MySFLI rAM AwP,re 50r7r_ or=-7-7;F_ PPG.(3)-F_r-s 7)a-i—ojfe SIGNATURE CITY OF SAN JACINTO 312 E. MAIN STREET SAN JACINTO, CA 92583 COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT: AGRICULTURAL ADVISORY ALBANO PATRICK FERNANDES II (AL) 1070 FALCON COURT SAN JACINTO, CA 92583 (909) 487 - 1211 - HOME (909) 765 - 5150 - WORK I AM INTERESTED IN SERVING ON THE AGRICULTURAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE BECAUSE OF MY INTEREST IN THE AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRY IN THE SAN JACINTO AREA. HAVING BEEN THE AGRICULTURAL INSTRUCTOR AT HEMET HIGH SCHOOL FOR FIFTEEN YEARS, AND SERVING ON NUMEROUS AGRICULTURAL COMMITTEES ON THE STATE AND NATIONAL LEVEL, I FEEL I HAVE AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE MANY DIFFERENT ISSUES IN THE INDUSTRY OF AGRICULTURE. 1/2 A'LBANO P. FERNANDES II CITY OF SAN JACINTO 312 E. MAIN STREET SAN JACINTO, CA 92583 COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT Y1 I ITIE Fi2£5e1? 02'I 1©nl Ca� r'im 3 T&' NAME OF COMMITTEE NAME J0�!% r�LAA JR ADDRESS I (c r- 1 C © jaV CITY SAN ZIP c)a--c HOME PHONE (c 1 `-1 -C1 i © WORK PHONE (c-a(y C7 i 0_1 WHY ARE YOU.ANITERESTE_RIN SERVING ON THIS COMMITT E? h�?VF L E v P Kc i.)4 71-1+Y r7 :r? rteA r'7 rs-e IT i_s _I _ C,r4,.f.. l Ct 1 1- ALSO o,v£ Ta� A nT g. t Nun/ C -,v� r ,N6 hI,v, ` �I{^iAT NCEaI i c c;ic 14i"4 UN:0 —c (� - c.�r' -�\ � v��l ` j'J C>�� T?-I 1_C rr rr�,v� iTFF c "J C' (Y1S 14N PVi(; J IV.V. y ill P(Cc‘voP ' W4 IT^YI- .SIGN URE CITY OF SAN JACINTO 312 E. MAIN STREET SAN JACINTO, CA 92583 COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT C ; ( pi, Am, N ME OF COMMITTEE NAME r-1 -C) ADDRESS t (;) CITY9 7 Frcv) 4 1 / 3 3,6 ZIP / ‘,2 — HOME PHONE (1) - 7 75 WORK PHONE ( (2/2 7_ )/c-r WHY ARE YOU INTERESTED IN SERVING ON THIS COMMITTEE? I Iv) v c 0 ve - f, '"? 1 iv) ATUR -r) 2 1...4 V 1,1 A , 41 7 4 LI kAt 1 c ( 1) il 4 wou id 60 COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT NAME CITY OF SAN JACINTO 312 E. MAIN STREET SAN JACINTO, CA 92583 sit al-yr vtieo_ NAME OF COMMITTEE ADDRESS I )2 C° CITY �g�Yflr�h HOME PHONE cio y I-, 9 f `d WORK PHONE 9cO 9 65 `f 6 bS ZIP 9iPSg� WHY ARE YOU INTERESTED IN SERVING ON THIS COMMITTEE? 1 ntit,a.xpo n ( `an for .n io L eC3 vtw J SIGNATURE STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John Herrera, Finance Director Via: Lyle Alberg, Interim City Manager DATE: March 19, 1996 RE: Review of City Museum Budget RECOMMENDATION: It is respectfully requested that the City Council consider the Museum Association's request for clarification on the $500 budget cut to curator contracts services. BACKGROUND: The adopted 1995-96 budget includes $7,800 in General Fund support for the museum. Although the $7,800 adopted budget represents a $165 total increase over 1994-95 (for repair and maintenance costs), the amount allocated to the curator's contract was $500 lower. Attachment A of this report includes the adopted budget for the City museum. To compare the adopted budget with the first seven months of actual expenditures, a January 1996 Detail Budget Report is included in Attachment B of this Staff Report. Council will see that the Annual Budget column of the Detail Budget Report is $825 higher than the adopted budget ($8,625-$7,800); the reason for this is the $825 budget increase (funded by donation) adopted by Council on November 21, 1995. Council will also see that the Museum budget is over by roughly 81,700. This is largely due to a $1,475 curator bill from 1994-95 paid in the current 1995-96 fiscal year. A copy of the Museum Association's letter requesting additional funds is included in Attachment C. IC:',...AGENDAS\031996.MUS] ATTACHMENT A C:\...AGENDAS\031996.MUSJ 2 FUND: GENERAL FUND DEPT: MUSEUM Maint. & Operation ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION CITY OF SAN JACINTO 1995-96 PROPOSED BUDGET FUND: 010 DEPT: 6100-425 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 ACTUAL REVISED PROPOSED EXPENSE BUDGET BUDGET MAINTENANCE & OPERATION 3310 BUILDING R!M $ 3330 M & 0 - PARTS & SUPPLIES $ 3405 CONTRACTS, LEASES & RENTS $ 3500 UTIUTIES $ 3516 TELEPHONE $ 3894 CONTRIBUTIONS $ TOTAL MAINT. & OPERATION GRAND TOTAL ACCOUNT DETAIL 97 $ 135 $ 800 $ 50 $ 50 $ 6,000 $ 5,500 1,381 $ 1,200 $ 1,200 422 $ 250 $ 250 7,375 $ $ 9,275 7.635 $ $ 9,275 $ 7,635 $ DETAIL NOTES 3310 BUILDING REPAIR & MAINTENANCE Pest Control Svc., Paint, Repair A!C & Patch Roof 3330 OFFICE EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 3405 CONTRACT SERVICES Contract for Museum Curator 7,800 7,800 TOTAL $ 800 $ 50 $ 5,500 3500 UTIUTIES 3510 Water 230 3512 Gas 485 3514 Electric 485 TOTAL UTILITIES $ 1,200 3516 TELEPHONE TOTAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATION $ 250 $ 7,800 107 FINAL BUDGET 01 CITY OF SAN JACINTO 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET FUND: GENERAL FUND: 010 DEPT: MUSEUM DEPT: 6100-425 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION PERSONNEL SERVICES 1001 SALARIES - REGULAR 1002 SALARIES - OVERTIME 1003 SALARIES - PART TIME 1125 FRINGE BENEFITS TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 REVISED REVISED ADOPTED BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET 0 0 MAINTENACE & OPERATION 2110 OFFICE SUPPLIES & MATERIALS 2135 UNIFORMS/SAFETY EQUIP, 2180 SMALL TOOLS 3090 PROF & SPECIALIZED SVCS 3120 CONFERENCE, TRNING & ED 3310 BUILDING R/M 250 250 135 3330 M & 0-PARTS & SUPPLIES 50 50 50 3405 CONTRACTS, LEASES,RENTS 6,000 6,000 6,000 3450 VEHICLE/EQUIP RENTAL 3500 UTILITIES 1,176 1,200 1,200 3516 TELEPHONE 230 250 250 3625 ADVERTISING & PUBLICATIONS 3705 INSURANCE & BONDS TOTAL MAINT & OPERATION CAPITAL OUTLAY 4001 IMPROVEMENTS -OTHER 4020 BUILDING DEVELOPMENT 4045 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 7,706 7,750 7,635 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 0 GRAND TOTALS 7,706 7,750 7,635 8 0 CITY OF SAN JACINTO 1994-95 ADOPTED BUDGET - FUND: GENERAL FUND: 010 DEPT: MUSEUM DEPT: 6100-425 DETAIL NOTES ACCOUN DETAIL 3310 BUILDING REPAIR & MAINTENANCE Pest Control Service, Paint, Repair AIC & Patch Roof 3330 OFFICE EQUIP REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 3405 CONTRACT SERVICES Contract for Museum Curator 3500 UTILITIES Gas, Electric & Water 3516 TELEPHONE TOTAL 135 50 6,000 1,200 250 TOTAL MAINTENANCE & OPERATION 7,635 81 . . AGENDAS \ 0 313 9 6 . MIIS ATTACHMENT B 3 Jacinto :Jar. ur LAFbLD ACCOUNTING PERIOD 07/1996 0 GENERAL FUND DEPT/DIV 6100 MUSEUM/ 6D.1 ACCOUNT it* ****WWCORWNT*******7--RX-R-41*WRIMXYEAR-TO-OATERXWX*** - - --ANNUAL NCOM . * UB -SUB DESCRIPTION BUDGET ACTUAL XEXP BUDGET ACTUAL XFXF ENCUMBR. BUDGET BALANCE ObOT 20 COMMUNITY SERVICES 25 GENERAL SERVICES RErATR HASNTERAPET 33 10 R/M-BUILDINGS 135 .00 0 945 825.00 87 .00 1625 000:00 51 30 R/M-OFFICE EQUIPMENT 4 .00 0 29 .00 0 .00 50 50.00 0 33 *C4 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - :00 0 973 825.00 05 .00 1675 34 RENTAL & CONTRACT SERVICE 34 -0t; toNtkAct stAQICLS - 459 .00 0 3206 4325.00 135 .00 5500 1175;00- 79 35 UTILITY SERVICE T'J 16 UftLititj-Wif - 19 e.,4.0,5 137 133 310.60 234 .00 230 12 UFILIIIES-OAS 40 .00 0 280 56.07 20 .00 405 42.8.93 12 14 UTILITIES-EDISON . 40 .00 0 290 353.91 126 .00 4135 131.09 73 Ls 1€LEPH0NE 21 35.62 -170 147 230.33 157 .00 230 -19:67- --92 35 414 UTILITY SERVICE 120 99.67 ' 83 940 950.91 113 .00 1450 499.09 66 :,litl ;t; ,i-* biA4EkAL ,;EkOicEl. 717 99.67 14 50.1.9 6100.91 122 .00 0625 252207- --71' ------ 20 1.111 ** COMMUNITY SERVICES 717 99.67 14 5019 6100.91 122 .00 0625 2524.09 71 IV 6100 TOTAL *NMNN-Mil MUSEUM 717 99.67 14 5019 6100.91 122 .00 0625 2524.09 71 EPT 61 TOTAL *******1 MUSEUM 717 99.67 14 5019 6100.91 122 .00 8625 2521.09 71 ATTACHMENT C C. . AGENDAS \ 031996 MUS1 4 A nonprofit association sAN To Whom It May Concern: VALLEY MUSEUM A S'N 181 East Main Street San Jacinto, California 313 February 28, 1996 As requested by the City of San Jacinto Finance Depart- ment, this is a letter from the San Jacinto Museum asking for the quarterly check from the City due in the amount of $1475.00. In January we were informed by the Finance Department that the check due in December, 1995 should be request- ed for the amount of $1375.00, because the City Council had made a budget cut to the Museum of $100.00 per quarter or $400-00 per year. In my conversation on February 24 at the Museum Open - House with Councilwoman Debbie Cornett she informed me there had been no cut to the Museum. Would appreciate d clarification on this matter. The 4 quarterly checks are due in: September December March June Thank you. Yours truly e-t) Justine Dugan Curator CC: Mayor Conners Councilwoman Cornett. Councilman Williams dOuncilmap Smedley Councilman Scaario . • 4.4.11111111111111111P6...,,,- 6 • • 44Sialle • • f - on% oil TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk Via: Lyle W. Alberg, Interim City Manager March 19, 1996 Minutes - Special Meeting February 20, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of February 20, 1996, as presented. BACKGROUND We apologize for the delay in the timely submission of minutes. The delay was unavoidable due to significant computer conflicts, which were transferred by disk to the contractor from the City's computer system. MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY FEBRUARY 20, 1996 1.0 CALL TO ORDER The Special Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 5:10 P.M. by Mayor Conner in the Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, California. Present: Councilmembers Cornett, Smedley, Solorio, Williams and Mayor Conner Absent: None 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None 3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS None 4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY None 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY None 6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS None 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS None 1 8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS None At the hour of 5:11 P.M. Council recessed in closed session, with all members present, pursuant to the following: 9.0 CLOSED SESSION 9.1 Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency Negotiator: Richard Kreisler/John Herrera/Pamela Easter Employee Organization: Management/Confidential, San Jacinto Police Association, Public Employees of Riverside County (PERC) 9.2 Public Employee Discipline/Release pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 At the hour of 6:10 P.M. Council reconvened, with all members present, and announced no reportable action being taken. 10.0 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned. The hour of adjournment being 6:11 P.M. Submitted by Pamela L. Lee, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk Approved by Jim Conner, Mayor 2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk Via: Lyle W. Alberg, Interim City Manager March 19, 1996 Minutes - Regular Meeting February 20, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 20, 1996, as presented. BACKGROUND We apologize for the delay in the timely submission of minutes. The delay was unavoidable due to significant computer conflicts, which were transferred by disk to the contractor from the City's computer system. MINUTES SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY FEBRUARY 20, 1996 1.0 CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 6:00 P.M. by Mayor Conner in the Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, California. Present: Councilmembers Cornett, Smedley, Solorio, Williams and Mayor Conner Absent: None Prayer of Invocation by Pastor Buddy Ybarra The Pledge of Allegiance led by Councilmember Cornett 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 2.1 Recognition of Employees with No Sick Leave Usage in 1995 Chief of Police Holmes and City Manager Easter made presentations to the following employees: Howard Ballard Barry Backlund Thomas Cusson Martin Diaz Calvin Helm Christopher Holbrook Alex Lizola Dennis Love Michael Lynn Francisco Sanchez Bryan Vig Shirley Williams Robert Wilson 2.2 San Jacinto Lions Club Request for Fee Waiver Howard Chermiss, Representing the Lions Club, advised they were sponsoring a Circus and the City fees were upwards of $700. They had a problem with the animal inspection fee of $200. The Circus owners advised their animals were inspected by USDA and they had to uphold their restrictions and it did not seem right for the City's Animal Control to reinspect. There was also the fire inspection fee for a tent the circus used every day of the week and had their own inspections. Felt the $120 for a Fire Marshall's certificate was too high. They would also be charged a building fee, an unknown amount, for putting up a tent and the Circus February 20, 1996 knew what they were doing. Noted the Lions Club worked for San Jacinto and gave all their proceeds to the community. This was their fund raiser and the fees for the City was wrong. In response to Council inquiries as to what portion of fees they wished waived, he noted they did not want to pay the business license since the circus had been licensed at a lot of locations, there should be no building fees, nor an animal and fire inspection fee. They had no problem with the special event fee. Any fees saved would not come out of the proceeds that would go back to the City anyway. Councilmember Smedley favored waiving all the fees for a worthy organization. Councilmember Solorio inquired how staff came up with the fees, and what was the City's out of pocket expenses? City Manager Easter advised that staff was following the policy of previous Council and suggested each staff person could explain their fees. City Attorney Cox advised that some fees were established by ordinance, like the business license fee, and if Council was considering waiving fees, they would be considering those fees which were general fund and not established by ordinance, because they cannot violate their own ordinance. He thought some fees were set by resolution, but would have to review the code. Police Chief Holmes thought the animal control fees were set by ordinance. Community Development Director McNabb advised that the business license fee was by ordinance, as was the certificate of compliance. The fire inspection and building fees were not by ordinance, but those were dollars of cost for staff to conduct inspections. Councilmember Smedley felt Councilmember Solorio's comments were well taken, with regard to out of pocket expenses. Noted the City was already paying staff salary for electrical and fire inspections Community Development Director McNabb explained that although the existing business had a license, the proposal was a different use and class of license. The Motocross was a different use, while the circus was selling admissions and concessions which were profit making. Explained there were different fee structures and methodologies to approving a temporary land use. Some factors to consider were the uses allowed in February 20, 1996 the existing zoning, and the costs involved were for compliance and to set the conditions of use. The costs were also established to make sure the business was not "fly by night," like palm readers and fortune tellers. In response to Council, he pointed out that the City was not dealing with the Lions Club, but rather with the circus. The circus specifically structured their contracts with organizations to place the specific fee burdens on the organizations. Councilmember Solorio inquired how Council intended to pay for the services on paper, since there were no funds budgeted for the proposal and it was an expenditure of general funds? Mayor Conner noted that it was simply "overhead" to maintain employees to do inspections. Felt the animal control inspection was not qualified, since the officer would be gone anyway, and there would be no overtime. Councilmember Solorio felt they needed the latitude to charge the costs to overhead, and he had not seen that. Staff was being expected to do a certain job, under what pretext, and how would it be written off for the expense? Councilmember Cornett noted the inspections would be part of their regular work day and service provided. Councilmember Solorio wanted to make sure that staff understood and he did not want to see such an item budgeted. MOTION was made by Councilmember Smedley, seconded by Councilmember Cornett, to waive the $120 Fire Inspection Fee, $100 Building Permit Fee, and the $200 Animal Inspection Fee. Motion carried on a 4-1 vote with Councilmember Solorio dissenting. 3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS None 4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY None 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MOTION was made by Councilmember Smedley, seconded by Councilmember Cornett to approve the consent calendar as presented, with the exception of item 3 February 20, 1996 5.10, which was amended to included MasterCard payments. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote. 5.1 Warrant Register Approve warrant numbers 42361 through 42465, dated February 15, 1996, in the amount of $400,399.23 and Payroll check numbers 6802 through 6881 dated January 19, 1996. 5.2 Treasurer's Report - January 1996 Received and filed. 5.3 Minutes of Adjourned Meeting of January 23. 1996 Approved the minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of January 16, 1996, as presented. 5.4 Minutes of Special Meeting of February 6, 1996 Approved the minutes of the Special Meeting of February 6, 1996, as presented. 5.5 Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 6, 1996 Approved the minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 6, 1996, subsequently amended on February 27, 1996: Page 19, Top of Page, Item 7.3: No action was taken on the recom COUNCIL CONSENSUS to direct staff to analyze the potential impacts of the report recommendations on each parcel in the City, as they relate to access, staff to continue working with the City of Hemet, the County of Riverside and Caltrans related to the Sanderson/Warren Corridor and the development of the future Highway 79, staff to amend the Circulation Element to set the correct right of way in accordance with this Final Report, and staff to include working with property owners, to avoid inverse condemnation, and relate the issues to owners regionally and locally and allow input on ingress and egress. 5.6 Claim - Tyro, Hollie Jean - File # JS 96-10 Rejected the claim as recommended by the Claims Adjustor pursuant to Government Code Section 913. 4 February 20, 1996 5.7 Adoption of Resolution Establishing Rules of Procedure for the Community Preservation Committee Adopted Resolution No. 96-10 establishing Rules of Procedure for the Community Preservation Committee. RESOLUTION NO. 96-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE COMMUNITY PRESERVATION COMMITTEE FOR MEETINGS AND RELATED FUNCTIONS AND ACTIVITIES 5.8 Grant Deed for Fee Title to the Buena Vista Retention Basin Approved the Grant Deed for Fee title to the Buena Vista Retention Basin. 5.9 Acceptance of Easements for San Jacinto Sidewalk Accepted Grants of Sidewalk Easement from: Betty L. RoIlf; Delbert L. & Judith Feltis; Pance Smiljkovich & Zivko B. Ilich; Fernando Contreras; Tess Contreras & Gloria E. Contreras; Citrus Motor Company; Pacific Division Open Bible Standard Churches, Inc. ; Hubert W. Jeng & Cheng Shu; James J. Sun; Susan S. Sun; Mickey U. Yu. 5.10 Account Payables Prepay Utilities Adopted a policy allowing the Finance Department to release payment for utility and MasterCard bills prior to Council approval of the warrant register. 5.11 Request to Use City Streets for the 14th Annual Bunny Hop Fun Run on April 6, 1996 Approved the request of Valley Wide Recreation and Park District to utilize portions of Esplanade Avenue, Lyon Street, Pine Avenue and 7th Street for the 14th Annual Bunny Hop Fun Run on Saturday, April 6, 1996, 5.12 Adoption of Ordinance Approving and Adopting Amendment No. 3 to the Redevelopment Plan for the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Waived the reading in full and read by title only and adopted Ordinance No. 1021 approving and adopting Amendment No. 3 to the Redevelopment Plan for the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project. 5 February 20, 1996 ORDINANCE NO. 1021 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO APPROVING AND ADOPTING AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS None 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 7.1 Fiscal Year 1995-96 Mid -Year Budget Review MOTION was made by Councilmember Smedley, seconded by Councilmember Cornett to continue the matter to the next meeting, February 27, 1996. Councilmember Williams inquired why? Councilmember Smedley indicated the matter required further study and since the matter was not critical, it had already waited six months, rather than have the matter thrown in at the last minute, it could be studied further. Councilmember Solorio inquired if that was the consensus of the Council Ad Hoc Budget Subcommittee? Councilmember Cornett indicated the Subcommittee had not met on the matter because the numbers were not ready but the memo was prepared and changes made that did not reflect the subcommittee recommendations. They would rather meet than try to hash the matter out at the meeting. Councilmember Solorio agreed with Ms. Cornett's point of view and suggested there be a memo to the rest of the Council regarding the subcommittee concerns, prior to the matter being on the agenda. Councilmember Cornett voiced displeasure over how the matter was handled. She was open to a full discussion by Council but would prefer for the subcommittee to meet prior to presenting a recommendation. 6 February 20, 1996 Motion carried on a 4-1 vote, to continue to February 27, 1996, with Councilmember Williams dissenting. 7.2 Consolidation of City Hall and Community Development Buildings Discussion of Police/Fire Facilities Fire Marshall Wilson made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. Offered to answer questions. In response to what had taken place, and what staff would be recommending, advised of the following: Staff had laid out both buildings on paper to see if it would work. It worked out to combine the two offices. However, the effectiveness was questionable. Concerns of staff were the number of items which would have to be moved to storage and other locations, how quickly they could meet ADA requirements, the cramped working conditions. The ADA requirements would mean losing two spaces at the front of 201 East Main Street, and they would not be able to operate as they currently did. There was some cost savings on the lease, utilities and loss of time between the offices, about $31,387, in addition to the one time cash savings on the computer upgrade because there would be no need for a file server, and $33,000 savings at the other office. Under option one, they would consolidate the two offices without meeting ADA and option two would be the same with ADA and some parking would be lost and there would be no room for expansion. The option would give the advantage of being able to work on ADA compliance at an estimated cost of $75,000. Option three would be to add to the rear of the building with ADA compliance and that would add an additional cost of $120,000. It was hard to estimate how long the improvements would suffice, but at least five years to stay in the building. Option four would be to consolidate with the School District in another building, with or without the school, with the advantage being ADA compliance in a place where there was room to expand. Staff needed some direction from Council whether they want ADA compliance, consider leasing or owning a building, and interest in relocating police and fire, possibly to Station 25, which would incur expense to remodel. Councilmember Smedley did not see any benefit to staff spending time to analyze the savings to move to 201 Main Street, because the ADA compliance cost was out of reach. He would like staff to proceed on option four and look at other areas rather than combining the two offices. Clearly the City had to move out of 312 East Main Street, and eventually 7 February 20, 1996 they could better serve by moving out of 201 East Main Street, and generate income by leasing the building out. As for a consolidation at the Community Center or the City Yard, it would depend on the outcome of an item on closed session later on the agenda. Would not even consider portable building to update and meet ADA. City Manager Easter summarized the Council direction to staff to look at other space for moving the police administration, the suggestion of the City Corporation Yard and possibly moving the fire station up to Station 25 and an interest in eliminating the portables. Councilmember Williams indicated he had previously supported a consolidation of the two city facilities, and felt it made the most sense to find opportunities with the school district. Lacking that, staff should look at another suitable building and not limit the search too just the City Corporation Yard. Suggested there may be some potential to work out something with EMWD or the City of Hemet. Felt staff should look at benefits of monetary savings, as well as, efficiencies. Preferred the fire station be moved to the First and San Jacinto location, which would be a more immediate solution for the overcrowding at the police department. Suggested that the bays could be closed and the building extended to the rear. Police Chief Holmes indicated that County Fire felt there was a problem with the use of Station 25, because they did not have enough space and more would have to be built, at a significant cost. Councilmember Williams suggested that with the space sharing, CDF could share some cost, and a station was needed in the western portion of town. County Fire Representative Mello stated it was something they would have to look at. They did not have enough room for the equipment presently. They would look at options and report back to the Council. Mayor Conner questioned the variance in figures, stating six months previously, the expansion figures were $300-500,000 on a five year plan, and presently the ten year plan with up to 50 officers was $2-3 million? Police Chief Holmes did not recall prior estimates, but noted of the options considered for expansion at the station, one included adding a second story on the rear of the space. Council inquired regarding the current staffing and space shortage at February 20, 1996 Station 25, and a member of the audience indicated the engine was being parked in the back outside. Councilmember Smedley suggested, in light of the tight quarters and the amount of funding needed, that staff discuss possibilities with the School District or remove some parking at the Community Center and add to the Seniors building, utilizing the meeting room for city offices. That would provide a larger facility to meet senior demands in the future when the city offices relocated. That would be preferable to a facility with the fire department. Councilmember Cornett, although not sure where to look, felt the City had paid for the mobiles six times over and they were being used for storage while everyone else was cramped. Mayor Conner desired to see a County proposal to move three personnel and two trucks over to Station 25. Currently there were two stations only four blocks apart and a station was needed on the west side anyway. Felt certain the County had already planned for their future needs. Then there would be space available for the police department. During the Annexation 66 discussions, a facility was about $2-3 million, and the longer term it was closer to $10 million. Felt the lease at 312 East Main Street needed to be dropped and notice given by July 1, 1996, with staff moving back to 201 East Main Street. An expansion was needed to get desks in there with the ADA requirements, a cost of $1/4 million. Staff needed to be progressive and look at EMWD or whatever. Fire Marshall Wilson inquired if it was necessary to look specifically on Main Street? Councilmember Williams suggested that city hall was not necessary to anchor the area's business growth, but rather in the area to best serve the citizens. The business area, to be successful needed a retail interest to attract customers to stop and buy. Councilmember Smedley agreed with Mr. Williams, and suggested staff look at the Cornet building, which was available. It was located in a shopping center and not a bargain, but saw it as a potential location. Councilmember Williams felt in the long range, the most sensible was to build a new facility, but it was also sensible to look at what was already available. It would require a commitment from another agency to share and would be interested in what the Cornet building had to offer. February 20, 1996 Several parties discussed the future square footage requirements, as well as, the existing. Fire Marshall Wilson stated the School District had estimated 10,000 square feet without a meeting room, which would mean the Cornet building would barely work Councilmember Smedley noted if they took the space and then missed the opportunity for commercial to locate there it would be a tax loss to the City. City Manager Easter summarized what appeared to be Council direction as seeking a County proposal to move fire station staff and vehicles to Station 25, drop the lease at 312 East Main Street, look at various options for the staff from 201 and 312 East Main Street, look at the community center and corporation yard for expansion. Was that Council consensus, and what was the time line? Mayor Conner felt the community center area had a lot of history and there was not enough square footage to house the staff at the current levels, nor adequate parking unless the park were moved. He did not want to move the senior day care or food services out, but would like the changes as rapid as possible. Councilmember Smedley was not suggesting the community center as a primary solution, but one to consider. As for the police department portables, it was overhead which was going for storage and the city needed to get rid of buildings not in compliance with ADA. It was the ADA compliance which was driving all the moving, and staff needed to know how long they could postpone compliance, or was it imminent? Mr McNabb had advised that staff needed to develop a plan to transition the compliance and the first attempt was to consolidate 201 and 312 East Main Street That did not appear to be the way to go, so now staff would have to look at what else could be done. City Attorney Cox, in response to Council inquiry, advised the ADA compliance was past due, that the City should currently be in compliance. Mayor Conner suggested the City should be running parallel to the School District and their plans. City Manager Easter again summarized what appeared to be Council direction to first obtain a County Fire proposal to move to Station 25, cancel the lease at 312 East Main Street, not look at moving or consolidating 201 and 312 East Main Street, but instead look at other options, especially with the School District. The time line was 5-7 years 10 February 20, 1996 (Williams indicated at least five years), and not doing anything with 201 East Main Street, and both move to another facility when one was obtained. Councilmember Williams indicated staff needed to plug in the modulars as part of the comprehensive plan for the fire station, which would not happen unless the station moved to station 25. Councilmember Smedley did not see the matter taking five years. There were enough issues being talked about EMWD and Hemet leasing, and combined facilities with the School District yard with the police department, feeling it was 3-4 years away. A proposal for a joint use facility could be approached in the next six months, with about a year to build and on line 1-2 years. Staff should be thinking about a time line of 2-3 years, not five years. Councilmember Williams pointed out there had been a builder opportunity there for six years, but with the financial interest, expected to lease. Councilmember Smedley suggested the proposal needed to be updated and discussions centered around the school being the lead agency on the property and the building by the city on a lease purchase with the schools. Felt that was just around the corner and would like to see it happen. Councilmember Williams inquired if he was talking a two year lease option? Councilmember Smedley indicated he was, if another location could be found. Councilmember Cornett was concerned about the lease at 312 East Main Street expiring in August and that the City should be currently packing. Inquired if there was a month to month clause? City Manager Easter advised it was also her concern that city hall would be setting up on the street after August. Suggested staff meet with Mr. Divine regarding a month to month after August. That would allow some time to negotiate time for construction. Councilmember Cornett felt other influencing factors would be reduction of staff, budget preparation, and would like the issues on the study session docket immediately. There was no time to pack and did not want to get locked into another long lease. The month to month negotiations should begin immediately. 11 February 20, 1996 Mayor Conner suggested civic center offices on a pad, with about one acre, they could build 40,000 square feet. If they had 10,000 square feet, might have to move in twenty years and lease again. The city could build rapidly, there were utilities and American Village would welcome City Hall there. City Manager Easter advised that was an option which could be looked at. Councilmember Smedley felt that any pads left on the superblock would be better used for a fitness center or other tax paying business. He believed the proposal under consideration was good for the location across from the superblock. City Manager Easter summed up additional direction from Council, to add working on the month to month rent of 312 East Main Street, look at the Peacock proposal on Hewitt and Esplanade, as well as, on Esplanade. Mayor Conner suggested staff had some areas to move forward on and agendize the matter in 30 days. City Manager Easter indicated staff would come back in 30 days, or sooner, with some time lines and obtain a consensus on the direction. 8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS 8.1 Update on Museum Meeting Councilmember Smedley advised they had not met yet and he would report at the next meeting. 8.2 Appointment of a Council Bridge Standing Committee Councilmember Smedley noted the Council, at the last meting, had adopted a Resolution indicating working with the Soboba Indian Band, and part of the commitment was to have a standing subcommittee of the Council to meet with the Tribe Council. He would volunteer to sit on that subcommittee, unless two other members would like to? He believed the Tribal Council was in the process of appointing two of their members to meet with the City. Councilmembers Solorio and Williams volunteered. Councilmember Williams noted if the City got involved, there needed to be an established program of actual written correspondence on what could 12 February 20, 1996 be agreed to, and other than a wish list, there was no commitment of funds. They had sent someone to talk indicating a willingness to apply, but that could not be done alone. If work was to be done in a coordinated effort, then direction needed to be set ahead of time. The discussion could start out as Lake Park Bridge and end up Esplanade Bridge, and he would like it clarified what would be done. Councilmember Smedley indicated the picture was clear. He had met with Joy Schlendorf and the Supervisor of Indian Affairs, who did the Temecula Bridge. In that project, he had zapped all the funds for two years before the funds came through. Suggested the City follow the program through ISTEA funds of 80%. Ms. Schlendorf had an ordinance that would allow the City and Indians to work on a joint effort. It would be a huge economic development on that side of the river and the bridge was vital to that effort. As Mr. Brass had stated, the City made a commitment in 1983 with Soboba Redevelopment Project, and if Councilmembers were confused, suggested they back off and he would be happy to serve. Councilmember Solorio thanked Mr. Smedley for his assessment, but his concern was what people were involved? There had been no mention of anyone from Soboba. Noted in 1983 a wish list was presented which had no effect on the proposal, because there were no funds, and without the funds, they had nothing. Councilmember Cornett indicated it was her understanding the Indian Band was naming two individuals that evening. Maybe the other funding sources were not sources, but it needed to be approached in an organized manner, which had not been done before. Councilmember Solorio had no problem with that, the City had been working on the matter over a year with different people, and it appeared the concerns were different circumstances. The city applied for funds, as all do, in hopes of obtaining money. He would like to see something in writing regarding what the City would be going after and how they would get there. The City had tried for years and did not need more promises. Councilmember Smedley was frustrated with the past efforts and was willing to serve and go forward. Councilmember Williams felt Mr. Solorio's points were well founded. It was important to have a road map, the framework of what the City would commit to, and to document. The City had always tried meeting with no success, nor had anyone not recognized the important of the bridge. The framework would need to show Lake Park Drive as a priority, yet 13 February 20, 1996 Esplanade was more important to serve the Indian Band. So there was no confusion, the Soboba Redevelopment Project needed more roof tops, which was impacted by the economy. Down the road there would be some funds to mitigate, and the City had worked hard on the FEMA funds. In spite of hard work the past three years, funding was not received. As for the ISTEA funds, those would be at the request of the City, and it had not been decided if the City would hire someone or do that in-house. Those funds would also require a City commitment. Everyone was aware of the tough market for ISTEA funds and he would not want a subcommittee to limit opportunities down the road by tying up funds on the bridge. They needed to weigh the cost benefit. The City first needed to establish priorities, stick to them before moving forward. No matter what happened across the river, a bridge was needed. Councilmember Smedley did not wish to detract from the past Council efforts. He was very familiar with the work done by Mayor Oaks and getting the support for FEMA. The priority was the bridge at Lake Park Drive, and the Esplanade crossing was a different issue. Esplanade came about when the BIA informed the tribe they could build a rough road from Soboba to the eastern edge of the reservation. The Indian Affair Bureau would maintain the road, build culverts and the bridge at Esplanade. The advantage was clear to all, if the road through the reservation were paved it would access BLM acreage, which would not only provide an economic boom, but would make San Jacinto a destination resort and there would be opportunities to build campgrounds and recreation to add another dimension. They would ask BLM to put in both applications at the same time and run side by side. The city wanted the Lake Park Drive, and another alternative came up, which the Indian Affairs Bureau had funds for. The Soboba Redevelopment Project could not provide all the funds, but could provide 20%, and the band indicated they were willing to chip in 20`)/0 as well. The matter was discussed with a developer who was also willing to chip in funds, so if the City got the ISTEA funds, the City would not have to pick up all the 20%. A bridge was needed before anything would happen in that area, it was vital. Mayor Conner noted it was more accurate that it is vital to economics and public safety for the citizens. He had watched the general concept of the Soboba Villages for years, and the major recessions impacted the developer and the redevelopment plan. It was clear it was a new year and the new Council would do some positive things. Now it looked as though the Soboba development and golf course would take off and the bridge was just around the corner. He would like Councilmembers Smedley and Williams to work on the subcommittee and the City would have a bridge in five years. 14 February 20, 1996 COUNCIL CONSENSUS that Councilmembers Smedley and Williams would serve on the subcommittee. 8.3 Appointment of a Council Budget Ad Hoc Committee for 1996-97 Budget City Manager Easter advised that staff had begun work on the 1996-97 budget and schedule and would be working with the subcommittee. Staff needed to know who that ad hoc subcommittee would be. Councilmember Smedley desired the same two continue. Councilmember Cornett was interested in continued continuity. A lot of work had been done. Wanted to see what the numbers said and where they were headed. Councilmember Solorio inquired if the Mayor wished to continue? Mayor Conner indicated he would relinquish membership if another Councilmember wished to serve. City Attorney Cox advised the Mayor to receive input on who was interested in appointment, and then as the Mayor, make an appointment. To have an actual motion and action from the Council would formalize the committee as a standing committee and require compliance with the Brown Act, Mayor Conner appointed Councilmember Cornett and Mayor Conner as the Ad Hoc Budget Subcommittee. City Manager Easter suggested Council consider providing direction on what they wanted to accomplish in March so a budget could be brought in May. Councilmember Cornett suggested calendaring dual meetings for the mid- year budget and the budget for next year so they would be ready to move forward. Mayor Conner called for public comments from the public regarding the water line on Victoria. Diana Becerra inquired if the improvements on Victoria would cost the residents? 15 February 20, 1996 City Manager Easter advised that Council had voted to use CDBG funds for the improvements and there was no anticipated cost to the property owners. Councilmember Solorio indicated a need for lighting in that area. City Manager Easter advised that staff could look at the issue. Noted the lighting on Soboba Road was estimated to be $5,000 for each light. Councilmember Solorio suggested that Edison be asked to make the installation for free. Public Works Director Evans advised that Edison would install the overhead lumina lights on poles. Discussion regarding the status of existing lighting, which was uncertain, but perhaps they were in an abandoned alley behind the houses. Councilmember Williams suggested the budget subcommittee discuss waiving fees and urged them to look at a community promotion budget. Previous Council position was that the community should not bear the burden for other group's activities. While the Lions Club was a worthy cause and contributed to the community, the fiscal position was that waiver of fees needed to be a line item in the budget. They had been strict in past years and groups were required to make application in advance and be scrutinized or denied, and groups needed to know the status going into their commitment. Councilmember Smedley agreed, and also in private industry and developer fees where they were revenue generators, but the non -profits, like the Lions Club, should have revenue generating fees waived. Councilmember Williams pointed out that the fees were intended as user fees to provide for a needed service. Without the need and the provision of service, the fees would not be needed and there was a cost to the City. There were ordinances in place to address those issues. Felt that when the City was having to let employees go, it was tough to place the burden on the rest of the taxpayers. Felt there was value in obtaining a consensus to put the matter in the budget. Mayor Conner reported on the status of Annexation 66 payments being received by the City. At the hour of 7:55 P.M. Council recessed. 16 February 20, 1996 At the hour of 8:12 P.M. Council reconvened, with all members present, for closed session pursuant to the following: 9.0 CLOSED SESSION 9.1 Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - Initiation of Litigation, One matter 9.2 Conference with Real Property Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 (continued from meeting 2/6/96) Property: 269 Brown Street Negotiating Parties: Hults/McNabb/Chambers Glen & Sharon Under Negotiation: Price and terms 9.3 Conference with Real Property Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: 183 E. Third St. Negotiating Parties: Brian McNabb & Gilberto Marquez Under Negotiation: Price and terms 9.4 Conference with Real Property Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 (continued from meeting 2/6/96) Property: Parcel No. 435-020-019 Negotiating Parties: Dale Stewart and Pamela Easter Under Negotiation: Price and terms 9.5 Public Employee Performance Evaluation pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 (continued from meeting 2/6/96) Title: City Manager 9.6 Public Employee Performance Evaluation pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 (continued from meeting 2/6/96) Title: City Attorney 9.7 Conference with Real Property Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Location: Superblock, Parcels #439-90-081 and 439-90-087 Negotiating Parties: Brian McNabb, Bob Wolf and Larry Landsen Under Negotiation: Price and terms At the hour of 11:15 P.M. City Attorney Cox left the closed session. 17 February 20, 1996 At the hour of 11:50 P.M. Council reconvened in an open session, with all members present, and announced item 9.7 was not discussed and item 9.3 there was an acceptance of offer and authorization to purchase property with the purchase price being used as equity for a new RDA home, deferred interest free until the owner sold or rented the home. 10.0 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned. The hour of adjournment was 11:52 P.M. Submitted by Pamela L. Lee, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk 18 Approved by Jim Conner, Mayor TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk Via: Lyle W. Alberg, Interim City Manager March 19, 1996 Minutes - Special Joint Meeting February 27, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Joint Meeting of February 27, 1996, as presented. BACKGROUND We apologize for the delay in the timely submission of minutes. The delay was unavoidable due to significant computer conflicts, which were transferred by disk to the contractor from the City's computer system. MINUTES SPECIAL JOINT MEETING SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE HEMET CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 27, 1996 1.0 CALL TO ORDER The Special Joint Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council and the Hemet City Council was called to order at 5:05 P.M. by Mayors Conner and Van Arsdale at the Hemet Council Chambers, 450 E. Latham Street, Hemet, California. Present: Councilmembers Cornett, Smedley, Solorio, Williams and Mayor Conner from San Jacinto Councilmembers Lowe, Schroeder, Tandy, Venable and Mayor Van Arsdale from Hemet Absent: None The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Van Arsdale 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None 3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS None 4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY None 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY None 6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS None February 27, 1996 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 7.1 Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) - Bus Pass Presentation Steve 011er, RTA Superintendent of Transportation, made a presentation to the Mayor of each City, of a framed reproduction of the monthly pass with a scene from the Ramona Pageant. Councilmembers Smedley and Tandy commended the RTA staff for their work. 7.2 Presentation of Preliminary Highway 79 Corridor Concept - McNabb. Goldberg, Carns, Perez Community Development Director McNabb, San Jacinto, related the history of the Highway 79 Realignment discussions over the past years, and the issues, i.e., maintenance and the impact to local businesses. More recently subcommittees of both cities had been meeting to decide where to relocate and a joint effort to fund the construction. Identified the need to balance the issue of local and regional traffic concerns. They had talked to a traffic engineer to seek options. It was determined, based on the volumes of traffic from a traffic study, there was a significant need for two north and south routes, but not both regional in nature, with six lanes, multi -traffic signals and grade separations. Traffic Engineer Perez, Hemet, explained alternatives using a concept from the Hemet General Plan. Talked about the joint resolution to promote regional corridors, which supported a bypass from Highway 60 to Highway 10 and 215 in Temecula. There were two basic areas, south of Lambs Canyon and south of the Newport Road area. Whatever route the cities agreed on, would require the approvals of many agencies, which had been reluctant in the past, without a consensus from the two cities. There had been five possible routes, as follows: Warren Road south of the aqueduct, tying into Sanderson and going north. 2. The Annexation 66 proposal with a roadway buffer along the Sewer Treatment land and then along Sanderson. 3. A straight line, the shortest distance. 4. Warren Road and then tie into Ramona Freeway. 2 February 27, 1996 5. A transition north of Ramona Expressway. The subcommittees had narrowed their consideration to routes one and five. The reasons for eliminating the others were, number two met with concerns by CALTRANS regarding the design and speed curvature. Number three showed, when the parcels were overlaid, there were great severance issues to the property owners, and significant right-of-way costs. Finally, number four, although beneficial, would cause a major separation at both ends. Showed the various routes with exhibits on the walls and with overhead projections. Explained that the Sanderson alignment would come off of Warren Road, south of Cottonwood along the aqueduct and tie in with Sanderson and continue north. The benefit to that plan would be to not sever a lot of property and would run along the back of the properties. That plan would address the limited access and increased speeds. The north bound traffic could go along Warren or Ramona. Some of the alternatives focused more in San Jacinto based on a request from San Jacinto staff to look at the detail of how a local network would work. Some concerns were expressed about the future traffic volumes and the need to separate Ramona Expressway and State Route 79, similar to the Gilman Springs Road and Sanderson, which would require a lot of right-of-way. This was a prime area for San Jacinto land use for commercial and not desirable for grade separation. Instead the system would use an adjacent road for on and off ramps and still make the traffic movements fairly easy, but it would not be a traditional interchange. This alternative was basically similar to the last one. The Sanderson alternative, which would have some local roads closer move out to create larger parcels and Sanderson would be State Route 79. The other alternatives were to make Warren the State Route and not transition up to Ramona and then north and bypass the hills and make connection to Lambs Canyon. In that scenario, the State Route in San Jacinto would align and tie into Warren Road, showing the extension ofWarren Road to Gilman Springs Road, which was shown as a link in the San Jacinto General Plan. Under that scenario, the routing would be on Sanderson and that emphasis would still be traffic. That would be the main route, and rather than cut off at Gilman Springs, would need to connect to Lambs Canyon, which had topography challenges. There were more opportunities for traditional separations and crossings. Both Sanderson and Warren Road were major corridors for the future, but if the State Route were moved, then a determination could be made which would be preferred, but both would always be major corridors. February 27, 1996 In response to Hemet Council inquiry regarding time lines, Mr. Perez explained the bridge and right-of-way acquisition issues , they first needed to agree where the road would be, so as development occurred right-of- way could be set aside, which was typically 40% of the cost. That done, it would be more of a reality. Also, there was the funding issue, citing some federal funding for Highway 79 and the possibilities from a joint lobby by the cities. Those would not solve the whole road, but would make some interim level improvements. They had discussed phasing, beginning with signalization and right-of-way planning. There would be the need for studies and analysis for build out. Already had determined there would be a lot of north/south traffic and the need for a rural six lane highway, and would recommend an additional 25 foot for future expansion. In the interim they would have to go down Sanderson to the Ramona Expressway to join EMWD and across the Warren Bridge. To move the State Highway would still require a lot of work and negotiations with CALTRANS. It would be a benefit to move the alignment in the interim. Mayor Conner was concerned about the grade separations and keeping traffic moving, the major costs to extend Warren Road and a new bridge, the integration of traffic on a severe slope, as well as, a bridge in a highly seismic area, like San Fernando, Traffic Engineer Perez, Hemet, advised that was why staff was asking for some direction from both Councils if they wished staff to look at the two options in more depth and detail. A part of that process would be to determine some estimates on costs. They would look at more than just the road itself. They would overlay flood control drainage facilities because of their impact, and then come back to both Councils to determine if they had an alternative they wished to proceed with. There still was not enough information to determine a preferred alternative. Staff had met with County staff regarding the impacts to them, and preliminarily they were willing to look at the two alternatives. The next step would be to get cost estimates and seek help from the County. The County was already doing infrastructure in the area south of Winchester to Florida. There would be an incorporation into the study for better traffic numbers and some rough environmental work. Councilmember Smedley request more explanation on plan five, regarding the portion of the route across the Expressway and the San Jacinto River, connecting to Gilman Springs Road. February 27, 1996 Traffic Engineer Perez explained that was different than the other alternatives in that it was not just long term. They could make a connection with Sanderson as an interim alignment and then it could be combined with the right-of-way in the long term with Ramona, that was the significant difference. The emphasis was it was a nice thing to do and improve traffic, but would not be an integral part. Warren Road would be more important and could still be phased in when traffic volumes increased and funding was in place. In response to Hemet Council inquiry regarding problems with plan three, Mr. Perez stated there were some severance issues with the properties. It would be laid out north and south and cut across the middle of the property, which was the only access for those properties and they would want driveways, which was more costly and no more beneficial, In response to Hemet Council inquiry, regarding the cost being more than that of a bridge, Community Development Director McNabb, San Jacinto, stated it was needed for the San Jacinto General Plan, between Warren Road and Gilman Springs Road, they would be looking at another north south route and a bridge on the Warren extension. Lengthy discussion on the need for two routes and the potential cost. Staff urged the necessity of two north south routes, and the various aspects regarding lane widths, elevations, master plans, timing of building and development, available funding and alternatives for build out. Ultimately, it was the recommendation of the traffic consultants. More would be known when the plan was included in the County analysis and the numbers were looked at. Councilmembers of both cities felt other alternatives were more viable. Traffic Engineer Perez, Hemet, stated that both the first and fifth plans would have two connections, because the San Jacinto General Plan showed Sanderson going through. Much of the decision had to do with the interim issues and the ultimate timing. Mayor Conner noted that it was a matter of economics for the citizens of the valley. Based on the Annexation 66 traffic studies, roadway was set aside identical to the request of Highway 79 with egress for the commercial/industrial already pre -zoned. February 27, 1996 Hemet Councilmember suggested looking at Warren Road through to the Canyon and use as State Route 79, with a business loop through Sanderson. Mayor Conner indicated the second bridge was new to their Council and was not aware it was on the General Plan, Councilmember Smedley felt they needed to address the reservoir by the year 2000, and if not, something in the short range planning or there would be a traffic jam. Felt all could agree, they needed to study the short term and take a definite course through San Jacinto with consideration on the long term. He preferred the Sanderson route, but more study was needed on the Warren Road route. The bridge was undecided, but perhaps not worry about it presently, but something would be needed in time for Domengoni. Hemet Council indicated, only if CALTRANS could go along with the idea of Warren Road up to Lambs Canyon. Councilmember Smedley supported that, with a connection in the middle with a traffic light and access to farm lands. Hemet Council suggested the need to meet with the County, City of Perris and RCTC, to make sure Ramona Expressway did not get signals, since it would no longer be an expressway. Some concern voiced that a signal between Warren and Sanderson was not very far. Councilmember Smedley noted it was 1.3 miles, and existing signals were 3/4 miles, and access was needed to the raw land. Hemet Council concerned after meeting with property owners, the consideration of an interchange and signal that would halt traffic within 1.5 miles. Further, Domengoni had a short and long term plan which needed to be addressed. With CALTRANS it could be 10-20 years and their vision was six months. Mayor Conner stated on the Corridor Study by the County, from 215 to Florida, it was suggested there should be egress to the Expressway and along that section every .5 mile, with access along Warren Road at every mile and egress at Cottonwood, Esplanade, Lyon, Florida and eventually Stetson. February 27, 1996 Traffic Engineer Perez, Hemet, stated they would address the study and try to keep the .5 mile. He noted staff was asking for some direction to proceed with a detailed study on both plans. It was premature to select an alternative without major cost and environmental studies. Staff was asking if the two alternatives be considered but not resolved currently, not until other issues were addressed. Everyone seemed to want to push as soon as possible and to seek some funding. However, before proceeding they would need an interim agreement and ultimate alignment. CALTRANS would also need to look at the ultimate. Staff would come back to both Councils regarding costs and the environmental issues. Hemet Council noted the plan posed problems at the corners, turning, Ramona Expressway to Warren Road would be hard to negotiate. Traffic Engineer Perez, Hemet, noted it was a cost issue. The County had adopted a similar plan for turning into Newport Road. The separation would involve some major structural costs, with a distance of 300 feet or more, with merging traffic and then splitting up again in a relative short distance. Responding to Councilmembers inquiries, advised there was a huge amount of right-of-way from the Expressway back to Warren Road. In addition, either alternative would use the existing bridge. There was no greater traffic benefit, but more cost. The alternatives were what presently looked the best and staff would come back after the studies with the costs and seek further direction. Plan five was significantly higher cost than plan one and four because of the major fly over. Clarified San Jacinto was looking at one signal, but those were some of the costs involved with the interim portion. Councilmember Smedley wished to see costs on plan one and five, as well as across the Ramona Expressway and Lambs Canyon to compare to that of the San Jacinto bridge. Further, it was important to bring the land owners in the area into the loop so as not to result in condemnation. Hemet Council indicated they normally conducted public hearings and a separate committee without Council representation, to bring back a recommendation, but that was up to San Jacinto how to proceed. Councilmember Smedley indicated their Council had incorporated a fourth item to their review of Highway 79, to incorporate input from landowners from San Jacinto in the planning stages. Hemet Council felt that plan five had a large landowner, and plan three and five would still divide the landowners. Wanted to see a cost analysis. February 27, 1996 Mayor Conner clarified for the Hemet Council that Annexation 66 had already zoned the area for commercial and industrial. Plan three had only two property owners currently. Discussion regarding various properties and sizes. Councilmember Williams noted the matter could be discussed at great length, but staff was seeking direction and a more comprehensive review was needed. The costs later could force the issues. The previous Council had identified the area as prime retail and commercial development so the access points would be a significant issue. He could support either plan one or five, and it made sense to follow Sanderson and turn to Warren. As for Domengoni, they needed to move forward and that issue was not clear. Community Development Director McNabb, San Jacinto, advised the Ramona Expressway would still be a main route, and if plan five were used, a grade separation would be needed. The Ramona Expressway was designated scenic and had a 25 foot set back, and right-of-way was lacking. On Sanderson they had right-of-way of 100 feet, the Expressway was 142 feet and Warren Road 188 feet. Traffic Engineer Perez, Hemet, noted there were creative things that could be done with set backs from a zoning standpoint, and with landscaping. Hemet Council inquired if they went with alternative one and five, along with the study of funds, would it include an interim across where plan five was and not make the loops? Traffic Engineer Perez, Hemet, indicated it would and they would do a cost estimate for the interim on that alignment, with some funding from RCTC and WRCOG. Councilmember Smedley felt ready to recommend directing staff to study the two routes, plan one and five, and for staff to seek funding, but if Council wished to wait, they could do that as well. Councilmember Cornett felt costs were needed, and that plan two and three were out. Felt plan five was good for the interim, and plan four was too costly due to signalization. Did not feel there were any other alternatives, just needed cost and more time with the Council. February 27, 1996 Councilmember Williams inquired how the plans fit in the infrastructure with the WRCOG mater plan? Traffic Engineer Perez, Hemet, indicated they had a comprehensive transportation plan for the region which had not yet been released, so that was uncertain. Councilmember Williams indicated he had seen a draft the first year, which included an overlay for the next thirty years for the whole area. Traffic Engineer Perez, Hemet, indicated that the staff of both Hemet and San Jacinto had met with them 1.5 years ago and they favored the infrastructure at the time, but they were still behind on identifying some key issues. Their draft should be released shortly and it would be incorporated into the study. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Smedley, seconded by Councilmember Cornett, to direct staff to work with Hemet on the feasibility study of routes one and five, for the purpose of bringing those cost figures back to Council, and to seek funding from RCTC and WRCOG. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote. Community Development Director McNabb, San Jacinto, clarified with Council, that the motion included the staff recommendations one through six, as outlined on the agenda, as follows: Direct staff and council sub -committees to continue working on the Highway 79 Corridor as follows: 1. Pursue funding from WRCOG and/or RCTC to both reimburse the Cities for costs incurred to date and to pay for a complete corridor analysis. 2. Integrate the Circulation Plan with all other known infrastructure plans (drainage, etc.) 3. Prepare a cost estimate for each alternative route. 4. Develop a phasing plan for each alternative route. 5. Consult with interested groups and property owners related to the Corridor. February 27, 1996 6. Consult with the County of Riverside and Cal Trans to develop a consensus on the routing options. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Lowe, seconded by Councilmember Schroeder, to approve staff recommendations one through six, Motion carried on a 5-0 vote. Hemet Council proposed that both Councils send letters and phone calls to RCTC, WRCOG and SCAG to convince them not to spend funds in Orange and Los Angeles Counties, but to work on Riverside County. Felt that if both worked to that end they might see a change with a push for more money in Riverside and they might finally quit funding 91 through Orange and Los Angeles. Two suggestions were made for naming the alignment, the San Jacinto Freeway and the Domengoni Freeway. 7.3 Joint Dispatch Services - Evanson Matter not discussed due to the lack of time. 7.4 Overview of Recycling Program - Temple/Carns/Farni City Manager Easter, San Jacinto, commended the Hemet staff for the job done on the program. Integrated Waste Management Superintendent Farni, Hemet, gave an overview of the program. Regarding the education portion, letters were sent in English and Spanish to all the businesses and residences informing the program would begin in June. Bids for the vehicles were received in May, along with receipt of containers, which were distributed to residences. Each container had a sticker with the rules of the program. There were two types of containers to suit the diversity of customers. Staff also visited businesses to coordinate the refuse service. Indicated that the green waste was the last program developed and out did Hemet in tonnage. Following a suggestion by the San Jacinto Council, permanent stickers were developed, along with hotline numbers for citizens to call, which improved the education program for both cities. Noted the fully automatic commingling had been successful. Some suggestions had been made for larger containers and once a week recyclables. In response to Hemet Council inquiry regarding the percentages, advised he was not sure, it would depend on the baseline used for 1990. He would be working with staff during the next couple 10 February 27, 1996 months to come up with a baseline and total diversion based on tonnage. Roughly he thought it was about 17%, and the proposal was working on 11%, so they were well up in the ranks. That did not include OK Associates, etc. Stated they were a little under the estimate due to the commercial. Councilmember Cornett stated, that in the interest of time, she felt the operations were going well, but she had a lot of questions regarding the finances. Requested that both subcommittees get time together, perhaps more than one meeting, as soon as possible. It was clarified the two City subcommittee members were Councilmembers Cornett and Solorio from San Jacinto, and Councilmembers Lowe and Venable from Hemet. Hemet Council inquired if there was anything the subcommittee could provide to the whole Council presently? There was the concern that payments were behind, and there was work needed on the financial side. There seemed to be a consensus that it would save time for the subcommittees to meet. City Manager Easter, San Jacinto, indicated she would follow up on the comments, noting there were a variety of issues they would continue to discuss with staff and the subcommittees, some of which would require more in depth study. Hemet Council indicated concern, with the loss of City Manager Easter, who would follow up, or would that be part of her ongoing consultation through August? Councilmember Cornett indicated they were not ready for staff just yet. Hemet City Manager indicated they would meet in about three weeks. Councilmember Smedley inquired what happened to the mag wheels and chrome bumpers since their original orientation. Cited those as expensive items and wanted to know what happened to them. 8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS The two Councils seemed to reach a consensus to the following: 11 February 27, 1996 1 There was a need to address issues such as Library, Edison, Sewer, Water, Public Works, and Road Maintenance joint projects. 2. Although joint meetings were valuable, it would be helpful and appropriate for subcommittees to meet first on issues before coming to the full Council. 3. More time needed to be allowed for on the agendas. 90 CLOSED SESSION None 10.0 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned. The hour of adjournment was 6:45 P.M. Submitted by Pamela L. Lee, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk 12 Approved by Jim Conner, Mayor TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk Via: Lyle W. Alberg, Interim City Manager March 19, 1996 Minutes - Special Meeting February 27, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of February 27, 1996, as presented. BACKGROUND We apologize for the delay in the timely submission of minutes. The delay was unavoidable due to significant computer conflicts, which were transferred by disk to the contractor from the City's computer system. MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY FEBRUARY 27, 1996 1.0 CALL TO ORDER The Special Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 7:20 P.M. by Mayor Conner in the Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, California. Present: Councilmembers Cornett, Smedley, Solorio, Williams and Mayor Conner Absent: None The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Conner 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None 3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS Joy Schlendorf requested to speak, since no public comment was allowed at the last meeting. Stated she was a consultant on Government Affairs and represented significant land owners in the area of the Highway 79 Master Plan, i.e., Peacock, Minor and multiple Families. Suggested that decisions not be made without involving those land owners, because their issues could hold up plans. She felt it was possible to settle the major flood plain issues on plan five, and by working with them, a plan could be put together to move the matter forward. There was a need to solve the Mystic Lake issue before land was taken from the flood plain. There were wetlands that would not have access and staff had not approached any owners. The owners wished to work together and get the highway done. Councilmember Smedley felt the matter was well put, and noted there was an item on the agenda to correct the minutes of the last meeting, as well as, Hemet had incorporated the same at the prior meeting. He could not imagine addressing local and regional corridors without input from land owners. 4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY None 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY None 6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS None 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 7.1 Review of Village 4 Owner Questions Related to CFD#1, AD 94-1, LLMD and for Soboba Springs Redevelopment Plan Community Development Director McNabb explained that the primary focus was for residents to approach the Council with questions and receive answers. The homeowners unofficial group had met with staff and the Council subcommittee to resolve issues related to the regional CFD, use of funds, fire truck issues, and improvements to Soboba Road. There were still lingering issues. Introduced Ken Brass who had been actively working with the City, who had distributed a list of his questions, which was the basis of the staff report and presentation. Each item was covered in depth as contained in the staff report as follows: A. Property owners worked with the City to eliminate themselves from any future CFD tax on infrastructure. They paid their fair share by replacing the CFD with AD 94-1. They paid to widen Soboba Road, landscaping and a few other improvements. In order to sell the bond and make it marketable to the public, yet have cash flow to pay the annual indebtedness, it was structured for the first two years that developed property would have a higher rate and subsequently the tax would fall off. The tax over the life of the bond favored the developed parcels, and the vacant parcels, when permits to develop were obtained, would pay slightly more. Councilmember Cornett requested that the public be allowed to speak to each issue to allow a free flow of information. Ken Brass stated he represented, unofficially, the Mountain View Homeowners, having solicited the signatures of 75-80% of the homeowners to allow the committee to represent them. 2 February 27, 1996 Councilmember Smedley acknowledged the representation was recognized, and exceeded that of the Rancho San Jacinto group. Mr. Brass stated that when AD 94-1 was instituted it was to replace the CFD for the infrastructure and the opportunity was offered for homeowners to pay off the assessment immediately and avoid participating in the bond issue. About 65 homes bought out so there were about 45 homes left along with the vacant parcels, who were the current debtors of AD 94-1. The bottom line was, where would that settle, and what was the annual payment to cover the indebtedness? Mr. McNabb indicated it should settle next year and the cost was between $400-600. Mr. Brass indicated the communications were not totally complete, and it appeared it would escalate the first two years, which was a surprise. They did not realize it would go down again. However, the bond consultant and staff could not tell what it was exactly until the bonds were sold. Suggested staff could provide the homeowners with the actual figures. City Manager Easter pointed out there was a difference between the AD 94-1 and the CFD. It was the AD 94-1 that did the improvements and that was the assessment they were paying for. Mr. McNabb explained that CFD #1 was structured to install a number of improvements, curb, gutters, sidewalks, road widening, water tank on the hill, upgrade the sewer lift station in Village Five, build sewer line for EMWD and some storm drain work. Each Village and unit was supposed to participate equally. Based on the tax rate formula, if one dwelling unit was the same rate, and with the various types of structures, larger houses would pay more. When the recession hit and construction stopped in Village Four, the road improvements were deferred until the economy picked up. The residents were concerned about waiting and felt it was a negative impact to their tract. So a Mello Roos was negotiated with the City to finish the Soboba Road improvements and AD 94-1 was created. Realistically the cost of the interim improvements was a benefit to all, but Village Four were paying less than their fair share and the private sector had to pick up that cost. Councilmember Smedley inquired what that had to do with the public safety tax? February 27, 1996 Mr. McNabb advised it was still there and was called CFD tax B, and it was not a negative issue. City Manager Easter advised that Tax B was CFD #2. Village Four was CFD #1 Tax B, and all the others were in CFD #3. For Council, clarified that AD 94-1 had nothing to do with the public safety tax. Only Rancho San Jacinto and Village Four had their own designation for public safety and all the others had it under CFD #3. Councilmember Smedley inquired regarding the 2% cap increase? Mr. McNabb advised they were not structured differently, but the tax assessed did not have a specific maximum like a Mello Roos. Stated staff could actually print a schedule to address for the residents what they would pay over the life of the district. It could be approximated and the only variable would be the annual administrative cost, which were a few dollars. Again, in response to Council inquiry, stated that a one time buy out was offered at the beginning. However, once the bonds were sold a buy out could not be obtained without a penalty. City Manager Easter advised that staff could do a newsletter, like that for Rancho San Jacinto, to provide information and the actual assessment figures. Mr. Brass indicated an information sheet would be sufficient, since it only involved about 45 owners, it was not a major issue, but some did not understand. B. In Village Four, there were two different final tract maps, which once approved and recorded, consisted of the final phases (Tracts 21900 and 21900-1). There were approximately 5-6 lots which were landscaped and maintained by the City district. Those lots were offered by the owner for dedication, but not accepted by the City, so those remain in private ownership. Two lots were put up for tax sale and others offered for open space in perpetuity. The City was maintaining the lots through the LLMD. The concern was what would happen to the lots if offered at bargain prices, could they be bought and fenced off or developed? Theoretically, unless the property were taken off the tax rolls and dedicated to a public entity, they could be sold. However, that would come with a lien for open space and the owner could not do anything. The City tried to forestall the sale and had contacted the County Tax Collector. The response had been, there was no provision to give the property to February 27, 1996 the City, but if they did not sell, perhaps they could be given to the City. The tax sale was scheduled for mid March. Clarified for Council if the property were taken by eminent domain, the City would have to buy the property. Ken Brass stated the residents were concerned, that as owners they were paying $271 annually for the LLMD maintenance, and would hate to see someone purchase the lots at a bargain price. It was a minor issue, but they had talked to staff for months. There was also an issue with two lots with the same number and it was a matter of housekeeping, and was concerned what would happen in 30-50 years when the property was actually worth $500-600,000 each and some heir caused a problem for the rest of the owners. The matter needed to be cleaned up. Council directed staff to keep them posted on the matter. Mr. McNabb advised it was all still a part of the redevelopment plan for the bridge, which was the single purpose. Items C through H. Public Works Director Evans stated that most of the questions had been addressed by either being resolved or developing a plan to resolve. The three major issues were matters of nuisance and hoped that improvements had been made, and then some were a matter of unfunded mandates, and finally there were issues related to conflict with private property owners. An example was the golf course drainage, which was on private property. There was no City easement for maintenance, and then how would it be funded. There were three acres of landscaping, mostly turf, for which small property owners support the large landscape area and pay higher assessment than any in town, with Rancho San Jacinto being the next highest. Because of the high cost, there was also the high expectation for service, which the City could not provide. Staff had cleaned up around the debris basin. One of the biggest problems was the retention basin, as one drives north from Lake Park Drive to the golf course along Soboba Road, the first thing on the left was the retention basin, which was a fenced deep hole. At times it had been full of mud, and the drainage pipes were also full of mud. During the construction of the assessment district, the design was revised, making it harder to clean. The estimated cost to clean was $20,000 and it was on private property. Everyone remembered the history of it differently, but basically it was an underground pipeline without a clear understanding who was to maintain it. It was constructed to provide drainage under Soboba Road and across the golf course. Item H was the most difficult matter to resolve. Some of the past options included the City Attorney February 27, 1996 writing to the golf course, which was now under new ovtreiship. The attorney's position was it was a matter that the golf course was responsible for. The previous Council notified them of the responsibility. Another alternative would be for the City to accept it and maintain the facility, but it would need an annual budget to clean it out during bad weather. In response to Council inquiry, advised that the City had not enlarged it, due to the lack of space, but had excavated and lined it with rock, and redesigned and rebuilt the inlet structures. It was better than before, but would eventually plug up. Mr. McNabb advised that Village Six needed a larger basin, and one was planned, designed and bid, to be built with funds from AD 94-1. The dedication was to have been provided with conditions from the property owners, but the conditions were not acceptable nor way the dedication accepted. The concept was that, that basin would relieve the burden on the lower basin. It would eventually be built with the development of Village Six, Mr. Evans, in response to Council, advised that the bonds pulled were used to hire a contractor to complete construction of the surface streets where there was cracked and broken concrete. City Manager Easter advised that the bonds were specific to internal infrastructure. Mr. Evans noted that a closely related item, item G, on the Mountain side of the road, there had been mud slides the past 2-3 years. The City Attorney prepared letters to the property owners requesting they prepare a plan on how to minimize the erosion from their property to the road. The owners ignored the letters and now the ownership had changed. Perhaps the City should renew their contact. Mr. McNabb noted the erosion problem stemmed from the Village Six dirt being used for Village Four site, relating to the recession. Recently the property owner indicated interest in developing Village One, and wanted to continue on the original agreement to share dirt. Staff explained the problems to the owner and was expecting an answer the next day. However, the buyer felt the issue had not been disclosed to him and it was the liability of the seller. Mr. Evans advised there was no cost estimate, but the plan would have to include seeding and a temporary irrigation system. February 27, 1996 Mr. McNabb advised the owner, who was aware, and would preliminarily pursue stabilizing, but he may not be able to further develop Village One and Six. Lengthy discussion on the removal of dirt from one village to another. The various legal ramifications were unknown. The matter went back to Soboba Associates and the Brookfield foreclosure, and whether there was a claim to the agreement. Ultimately it was a civil matter not binding upon the City. Noted the matter of implementing a development plan would have to address stabilizing the hillside, but if it were a matter of selling dirt, that was a mining issue. Mr. Evans noted that the former Council had struggled with items G and H. However, he thought the new property owner was willing to reseed the hillside. Staff needed to meet with the golf course to determine their position, unless Council wished to provide other direction. The City could continue to remain firm on their position, or include it in their budget discussions. Staff could not address Council inquiry regarding the status of the golf course claim against the City, would have to report back. Mayor Conner stated that generally, on private property with a pipe line there, the landowner down stream was the normal course, would have to take water from their neighbor. The whole issue belongs to the golf course and if it was clogging up on the surface of the golf course, he did not see the City as obligated. Someone from the audience stated the flow was not through the golf course, but dumped onto the golf course. Mayor Conner noted that perhaps for economic reasons they did not want it to flow that way. Councilmember Smedley thought it was a good point, the issue was a civil matter. Mr. Brass felt the proper position was for the down stream to accept the natural runoff. However, he was concerned that it was an unnatural runoff. What had been graded and ran off a couple years ago was on both sides of the channel and unsettled. The next rain carried it through the culvert and filled the basin, which was not normal. The Village six property was granted permits from the City and conditioned to reseed, but February 27, 1996 there was never a bond for the conditions and the owner walked away. Then the property owners for AD 94-1 paid $300,000 to clean it out where it was being abused by the property owners up stream. So the natural runoff was not the problem. Mayor Conner noted the City's legal counsel was not present, but he thought it correct about the natural flow and if the property owners upstream had diverted it elsewhere, it would be subject to lawsuit or condemnation. For Village six the cost to reseed would be less than $1,000, but it had to be timed right, and the condition and time was now. Staff advised the owner was informed that day. Following discussion on the original conditions and permit process, staff was to research the back ground on the permitting process and report back to Council. Councilmember Williams suggested that staff continue with previous Council direction to reseed to prevent the flow and should reassert that claim and take steps to resolve the matter until development occurred. Mr. Brass was concerned that the matter had been discussed for two years and nothing done. Wished assurance that something would be done and some follow up. City Manager Easter suggested, if Council wished, they could direct the City Attorney to write the new property owner, with a date to respond, and place the matter on the agenda for follow up in six weeks to two months, to bring back the response. Mayor Conner suggested utilizing the Beautification ordinance, similar to weed abatement, to secure plant material and have the city do the work themselves and notify the owner. Councilmember Smedley knew the owner and stated there were some discussions regarding the sale of the property for development shortly. But definitely something needed to be done. Councilmember Solorio suggested the reseeding be a condition of the sale. Mr. McNabb stated there was no legal right to meddle in the condition of the sale. City could not lien the property without the proper public hearing and notices to declare a public nuisance. February 27, 1996 Councilmember Williams did not want to wait for another change of ownership. He was disappointed that staff had not been more aggressive on the previous Council direction and the delay had perpetuated the problem. COUNCIL CONSENSUS to direct the City Attorney to follow through on the matter and report back. Mr. Evans reported that the trees lost at the entry way were not replaced. A replacement had been found for $225 delivered and requested Council direction to proceed. Felt there were funds available for the replacement. There was also the issue of replacing decorative lighting, which had not been in operation for four years. It still did not fit in the budget. The wiring was there, the timer was missing and staff could get prices for the fixtures and staff requested Council direction if they wanted that in the budget. At the hour of 8:29 P.M. Councilmember Smedley left the Council Chambers. Mr. Evans noted they were having a difficult time with the sprinklers, replacing valves and broken lines. It seemed they were unable to keep the system together. There was a particular problem at the corner of Messina and Turino, with water puddling at the end house. Staff had previously worked with the owner to adjust his irrigation, which also impacted the situation. It appeared it was also being impacted by the irrigation from all the houses above and they have continued to work on the problem, and would continue to do so. At the hour of 8:31 Councilmember Smedley returned to Council Chambers. Staff would continue to monitor the system, but there was also the need for property owners to stay on top of the issue also. Staff had regularly cleaned up the ditches and responded on a complaint basis. Cleaned in the fall, but only a matter of weeks later it was 95-98% the same. There was also the issue of the landscaping contractor leaving some cobblestone, and they had been notified to clean it up and staff would clean up any remaining debris and the golf course would provide the ongoing maintenance. With regard to the weeds, the contractor would maintain until April, with the cooperation of the weather. Mr. Brass stated the area around the debris basin was an orphaned area, a little corner where the developer could have built two more homes. It was owned by the golf course with an easement from Olive Ranch to cross to maintain the well head on the river. The City also imposed a 9 February 27, 1996 second access for emergencies, which was paved. But there was nothing to obligate the golf course and the residents were left with the cost of $1 million for Soboba Road improvements. However, the City was the only agency they could appeal to, to get things fixed. The City did not own the property and the golf course did not care. The area was very unsightly and residents had tried to maintain it, but the contractors used it for their yard operation and left it in a worse condition. Councilmember Williams noted the area in question was a mess and inquired why the City could not get the golf course to clean it? Mr. Evans stated staff was having the contractor clean the debris. Robert Carrillo clarified the easement granted to the fire department for safety. Mr. McNabb advised the easement was required for a secondary access, but the ownership was retained by the golf course. Staff clarified that the clean up of ditches in item D, would be done through the NPDES assessment. Further, the water behind the houses, the City was responsible for cleaning the drainage, but the golf course was responsible for the water puddling on the course, which would require the area to be built up to avoid it. City Manager Easter advised there was a call into the new General Manager to review some of the issues to see if they would cooperate. Regarding funding issues, Mr. McNabb went over the charts provided, stating that each year they zeroed out the balances and transferred funds to the main project. Noted also, they did not receive tax increment in the early years on raw land. The original creation of the Soboba Springs Project Area cost money, which was borrowed from development and had to be paid back. Councilmember Williams requested to see the figures back to 1983. Staff to bring back another report within 60 days, going back to 1983. Mr. Brass noted his concerns, that the original plan was good for what it intended, with a 45 year life span. However, the economy went bad and now 13 years into it there was nothing for the bridge, and the original estimate of $2.5 million had grown to $8 million. He felt there should be a cap of $5 million. He was interested in knowing what the various costs 10 February 27, 1996 were, i.e., engineering costs, administrative costs, which had to be borrowed and debt incurred to put the plan together. There was not much tax increment in the early years. Noted the golf course had sold for $7 million and the Tax Accessor should direct the RDA taxes accordingly, and the fund would build more rapidly. Mr. McNabb pointed out that the golf course would not generate much more than $20,000 in tax increment. Mr. Brass again pointed out that he saw $1.3 million just sitting there and again, nothing being done. Would like to see something solid moving. Suggested servicing the bond issue to get the area on the east side of the river going for economic development. Councilmember Smedley noted that Council, at the last meeting, established a committee to work with the Indian Band and consultants to get the project moving. Stated there would be ISTEA funds for 80% of the bridge and they would be looking to the RDA to address the debt service on 20% of the funds, with 20% participation by the Indians. It all hinged on the approval of funding. Councilmember Williams noted they still had to press on with FEMA, and it would take more than just committee work. Mr. Smedley seemed confident, and he hoped it would come to fruition and not fall on deaf ears. The fiscal year 1995-96 funding was only $1/4 million. Mr. Brass noted it took five years to get the road improvements and would not like to see the same delays with the bridge. Councilmember Cornett clarified that the Gilman Bridge with the realignment of Highway 79, was a matter of when complete, the state would no longer be responsible for maintenance, it would be the City, so there were other considerations. Councilmember Smedley, not meaning to belittle the human effort, stated that the plans for development along Soboba Road would not move forward without a bridge. 7.2 Results of Management Compensation Study - Easter City Manager Easter introduced Nick Nichols and Marta Robella. 11 February 27, 1996 Marta RobeIla used the overhead projector to show the charts contained in the report and went over the detail of each chart. Councilmember Smedley inquired if they were in a position to predict trends? Nick Nichols stated that most agencies tended to run close to the rest of the employees by paralleling the economic conditions, which most were not so good. He did see movement up in salary amounts, 2.5 - 3% increase, primarily in Orange County. At the hour of 9:13 P.M. Councilmember Smedley left the Council Chambers. At the hour of 9:15 P.M. Councilmember Smedley returned to Council Chambers. Mayor Conner inquired regarding the number of vacation days used to calculate the hourly rate. Nick Nichols advised they would provide that information to Council. Also, in response to Council, advised that employee benefits were shown on the Public Works Director in the event of the change. That would actually require more analysis. At the hour of 9:30 P.M. Councilmember Cornett left the Council Chambers, Marta Robella advised that the nine factors used to evaluate were from federal standards. At the hour of 9:31 P.M. Councilmember Cornett returned to Council Chambers. Councilmember Williams inquired in assigning worth to the job, did they draw any conclusions between the average 2.26% and the 2.14%? Nick Nichols noted that the position was underpaid, and that was the point value. In response to Council, stated it was not a judgement of what a position should be paid, but that it was relative to the average. Further, the study did not take into consideration other individual factors dealing with performance, etc. Councilmember Williams inquired regarding the strengths and weaknesses of the methodology of the system 12 February 27, 1996 Nick Nichols noted that the value of the point method was only a general value and the relative value did not correlate with the salaries paid. If the point value and salary were higher than the next, there was not a lot of relationship of the point value and salary. Most abandonded a point system because of what was tangible and the market driven factors. They never suggest that you rely on solid determinations, it was best to look at the market. Clarified for Council, what was missing in the city comparisons was the existing maximum rate. With regard to the median and mean, the median measure was related, as opposed to the average. The three were very close and ordinarily related to median. Mayor Conner found what he believed to be a disturbing trend, that the public sector was giving 30% more on benefits monthly than private. He felt it should be brought back level. Nick Nichols thought it would go back the other direction as more agencies were going to better plans. Noted that sometimes private had some retirement in addition to. Mayor Conner questioned if that was ethically correct? Councilmember Williams was hard pressed to see that social security, even fully funded, would meet the needs of retirees. Perhaps social security could be funded at a higher rate, but it was not uncommon for managers to pay their own retirement and the City not pay both portions. In some labor groups, it helped their single highest year, which was done through negotiations. That would be a tool to consider. PERS was well known and fiscally strong with a conservative management. Councilmember Smedley state he was not aware of a trend downward. Noted a bill was being put before the state to reduce the cost of state employees, which on comparison, were making more in almost every level, than private industry. The trend was to bring it down with a $1.6 billion savings, to the private level, and the cities and counties should follow suit. It was definitely a trend. Nick Nichols stated that downsizing had been a trend ever since the economy turned, but it did not translate in salaries. Councilmember Smedley noted they were talking about downsizing in dollar and cents. 13 February 27, 1996 7.3 Clarification of Minute Action - Regular Meeting February 6, 1996 - Lee COUNCIL CONSENSUS to direct staff to amend the minutes to reflect the action on item 7.3 of the Regular Council meeting February 6, 1996, as follows: Page 19 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 7.3 Ramona Expressway and Warren Road Development Standards - Final Report COUNCIL CONSENSUS to direct staff to analyze the potential impacts of the report recommendations on each parcel in the City, as they relate to access, staff to continue working with the City of Hemet, the County of Riverside and Caltrans related to the Sanderson/Warren Corridor and the development of the future Highway 79, staff to amend the Circulation Element to set the correct right of way in accordance with this Final Report, and staff to include working with property owners, to avoid inverse condemnation, and relate the issues to owners regionally and locally and allow input on ingress and egress. 8.0 MAYOR/COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS Councilmember Solorio felt that it was not the purpose of subcommittee reports to give direction to staff, but rather to come back and report to the full Council and gain a consensus of the whole. There seemed to be a misunderstanding of the intent and interpretation. The direction was clearly to come from the Council when they decide as a group. Mayor Conner suggested that issue could be agendized for discussion at the next meeting. Councilmember Smedley felt if there was a subcommittee for the budget, they did not have to come back to the Council when going over the budget and not come back to Council for approval if all was the same. 14 Councilmember Solorio thought that it was not predetermined that not all would have to follow the same rules and suggested if that were the case, to rewrite the rules so all would be on a level playing field, and not going on personal interpretations. Would like a report back with more information. Councilmember Williams felt there were other discussions necessary regarding the subcommittees and the decision making role. One illustration he used was an issue related to budget, where the Council had made a good faith decision not to fill the animal control position and directed staff not to fill the position, then it was reported in a staff report that the subcommittee had given direction to do something else. Councilmember Cornett stated that was not true, and that the direction had not come from the budget subcommittee. It was a suggestion by City Management of some strong interest in finding other alternatives, which were passed on to the Chief and he was exploring alternatives to bring back, as well as a committee exploring. The one Council comment was that they did not want anyone hired at the present time, which was different than the Chief hiring someone part time or increasing a particular employee coverage. If a subcommittee had said not to hire because a committee was exploring in the meantime, it was with no intention of doing anything, and the Chief just hire someone part time. Councilmember Williams suggested the matter be discussed in closed session if that was acceptable. Mayor Conner, in moving to public safety, stated Mr. Williams made an illustrated point on committees, indicating there were other issues, where the Council should not take it upon themselves to bring matters back to the full Council for consensus. Did not feel there was any fault or misunderstanding. It was protocol for all to have a clear understanding and how the interplay affected decisions of the Council. Councilmember Solorio cited as an example, the Highway 79, where no one actually reported back, but asked for direction looking at graphs, and the experts talked about the two plans and requested a vote. Councilmember Smedley noted that was a good point, and staff had let them down. Hemet had a workshop on the matter prior to the joint meeting, which was what San Jacinto should have done also, so the subcommittee could bring the Council up to date. Mayor Conner noted if the two on the subcommittee felt the need to bring the matter forward, it should have been done, but they thought they had direction. February 27, 1996 City Manager Easter suggested that an item could be added to the agenda under Mayor and Council reports for feed back. City Clerk Lee pointed out the need to keep such reports and intended actions posted to comply with the Brown Act. Councilmember Solorio stated that when the subcommittees were agendized to also clarify the action and other parameters, so there was no mistake with the public. Councilmember Cornett requested that the budget be agendized for the next several meetings. Councilmember Smedley indicated he would report on the RTA late in March, City Manager Easter noted staff would bring the animal control issue to the March 5 meeting with options for direction from Council. Currently the city had none and staff needed some direction for basic needs. Councilmember Smedley reported he would be in Washington March 15th for RTA. City Manager Easter clarified that the mid year budget would be on the agenda next Tuesday. Mayor Conner reported he would be absent from the March 5th Council meeting and the March 4th WRCOG meeting. He had met with the Library Representative, who would be reporting back to the Council four times a year. Councilmember Smedley suggested that the joint meeting with Hemet include addressing the library issue and that the joint councils have a committee meet before to discuss, as well, the dispatch issue, and decide if they wanted to appoint people or staff. City Manager Easter advised that Chief Holmes had done a lot of work on the Joint Dispatch issue. At the hour of 10:20 P.M. Council recessed. At the hour of 10:30 P.M. Council reconvened, with all members present, for closed session pursuant to the following: 16 February 27, 1996 9.0 CLOSED SESSION 9.1 Employee Discipline/Release pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 9.2 Conference with Labor Negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 Agency Negotiator: Richard Kreisler/John Herrera/Pamela Easter Employee Organization: Management/Confidential, San Jacinto Police Association At the hour of 1:00 A.M. Council reconvened in open session, with all members present, and announced that City Manager Easter's contract was amended. 10.0 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to conduct, the meeting was adjourned. The hour of adjournment was 1:01 A.M. Submitted by Pamela L. Lee, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk 17 Approved by Jim Conner, Mayor 5.5 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk DATE: March 19, 1996 SUBJECT: Minutes of Special Meeting of March 1, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of March 1, 1996, as presented. MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING S4N JAC|NTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE SAN JAC|NTOp|NANC|NG AUTHORITY MARCH 1'1996 1.0 CALL TOORDER The Special Meeting ofthe San Jacinto City Council was called to order at3:OO P.M.by Mayor Conner in the Community Development Officea, 201 E. Main Street, San Jacinto, California. Present: Counoi|membersCornett. Smed|ey, So|orio. Williams and Mayor Conner Absent: None 2�0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None 30 PUBLIC COMMENTS None 4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY None 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR ' CITY COUNC|UREOEVELOPMENT AGENCY None &0 PUBLIC HEARINGS None 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS None 80 MAYOR/COUNC|LMEMBERREPORTS/DISCUSS IONS None Atthe hour of3:O1 P.M.convened inmclosed session, with all members present, pursuant tothe following: 9.0 CLOSED SESSION 9.1 Public Employee Appointment pursuant toGovernment Code Section 54Q57 Title: City Manager At the hour of 7:00 P.M. reconvened in an open session, with all members present, and announced there was noreportable action taken. 10.0 ADJOURNMENT 1 There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. The hour of adjournment was 7.01P M. Submitted by Pamela L. Lee, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk 2 Approved by Jim Conner, Mayor