Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 3/17/1992AGENDA SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SI'ft'ING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DAIL: March 17, 1992 TIME: 7:30 P.M. PLACE: COMMUNITY CENTER 625 South Pico San Jacinto, California 1.0 CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Moment of Silence for Reflection Pledge of Allegiance 2.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 3.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 3.1 Proclamation - Hemet Valley Medical Center - Boykin 4.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person may address the Council on any subject pertaining to city business not listed on the agenda, during this portion of the meeting. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the Council. 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion by the City Council in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests specified items to be removed and/or discussed. Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come forward, upon invitation of the Mayor, state their name, address and the Consent Calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three minutes. Minutes of Special Meeting of February 25. 1992 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of February 25, 1992 as presented. 5.2 Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 3. 1992 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 3, 1992 as presented. 5.3 Warrant Register RECOMMENDATION: Approve Warrant Nos. 27903 through 28067 in the amount of $293,950.17 and payroll check numbers 19341 through 19522 in the amount of $182,453.74 dated February 28 and March 13, 1992. 5.4 Award Bid for Police Department Parking Lot RECOMMENDATION: Award the contract to California Asphalt and Grading Company, Inc. of Fontana and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. Award Bids for Bath Well Equipment and Grand Ave. Booster Pump RECOMMENDATION: Award the bid for the furnishing and installation of the Bath Well Equipment and the Grand Ave. Booster Pump to McCalla, Division of Layne Western Company, Inc. of Redlands and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract on behalf of the City. 5.6 Claim - Jeanette Rojas - File #JS 92-11 RECOMMENDATION: Reject the claim as recommended by the Claims Adjustor pursuant to Government Code Section 913. 5.7 Claim - Bert Salva & Sandra Salva - File #JS 92-09 RECOMMENDATION: Reject the claim as recommended by the Claims Adjustor pursuant to Government Code Section 913. 2 5.8 Claim - Ruth Forkner (Co. of Riverside) - File #JS 92-08 RECOMMENDATION: Reject the claim as recommended by the Claims Adjustor pursuant to Government Code Section 913. 5.9 Accept Donation - Hofmann Park RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. accepting on behalf of the City of San Jacinto all donated property listed for use in Hofmann Park RESOLUTION NO. 20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ACCEPTING DONATED PROPERTY FOR USE WITHIN HOFMANN PARK 5.10 Bond Release 5.10.1 - (Tract 24713) - Jenel Development Location: North side of Idyllwild Dr., 1500 ft. east of State St. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Council reduce the respective bonds as follows: 1. Sewer and Water by 90 percent from $208,000 to $20,800 2. Streets by 75 percent from $232,000 to $58,000 5.10.2 - (Tract 24330-1) - Winward Homes Location: North side of the Ramona Expressway at Chase St. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Council reduce the off - site improvement bond by 85 percent from $925,160 to $138,774. 5.10.3 - (Tract 25099) - P.A. Cassel Location. East of Vernon Ave. at Second St. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Council release the $8000 Certificate of Deposit for the maintenance guarantee of public improvements for the above referenced project. The one year period since acceptance of the improvements will elapse on March 20, 1992. 5.10.4 - (Tract 12152-1) - Forecast Homes RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council release Bond No. 9829445 for landscape restoration. 5.10.5 - (Tract 22882-1) - Forecast Homes RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council release Bond No. 977149S for subdivision improvements. 5.10.6 - (Tract 24745) - Forecast Homes RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council release Bonds No. 200746S, 200747S, & 200748S for water and sewer improvements. 5.10.7 Tract 22950-3) - California Ranch Homes ation: South side of De Anza Dr., generally east of Palm Ave. and West of Potrero St. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Council accept the public improvements release/reduce the respective bonds as follows: 1. Release Monument bond in its entirety 2. Release Labor and Materials Bond in its entirety 3. Reduce Perfoi mance Bond to 10 percent to a sum of $24,498.80 Final Map (Tract 22347) - Maddox Location: East of Palm Ave., South of Cottonwood Ave., North of Seventh St., West of Grand Ave. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Final Map 22347 and authorize the Mayor to execute for recordation, and accept the Certificate of Deposit #1347 in the amount of $14,000, as the warranty effective February 24, 1992, to be held for twelve months. 5.12 Sewer Agreement Release (Raymond & Jeanette De Cormier RECOMMENDATION: Approve the "Release of Recorded Instrument" for Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute for recordation. / 5.13) Request from Park Hill Elementary School to Discharge Firearms RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Ramona Pageant Cowboys to Discharge Weapons During their Demonstration. 5.14 1992 Annual Weed Abatement Resolution RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the 1992 Annual Weed Abatement Resolution of Intent setting the matter for Public Hearing on April 7, 1992. RESOLUTION NO. 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA DECLARING ALL RUBBISH AND REFUSE UPON SPECIFIED STREETS AND PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO TO BE PUBLIC NUISANCES AND ALL WEEDS GROWING UPON SPECIFIED STREETS AND PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY TO BE SEASONAL AND RECURRENT PUBLIC NUISANCES AND FURTHER DECLARES THE CITY'S INTENTION TO REMOVE AND ABATE THE SAME UNDER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 4, DIVISION 3, PART 2, CHAPTER 13, ARTICLE 2, OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE. 4 Janitorial Services Contract RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to enter into a contract with "In His Service" (IHS) for janitorial services at 201 E. Main, 312 E. Main, Police Department, Community Center and Corporation Yard. Purchase of Furniture - 201 E. Main St. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the purchase of furniture/office equipment for 201 E. Main (Development Services staff) in the amount of $9,200.00 The purchase shall be made from, Systems Source Inc. and funded from account 14-4600-5400 (Sewer), 18-2350-5400 (Workers Comp), 25-8250-5400 (II MD), 40-2500-5400 (Capital Improvement), 50-900(3-5400 (Water), and 65-8650-5400 (Fire Mitigation). No monies from the general fund will be used for this purchase. Transworld Collections Contract RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to enter into a contract for one year with Transworld Systems, Inc. for the purpose of recovering water, trash and sewer uncollectible accounts. Award of Contract with Tierra West for Appraisal of Assessment district 87-1 RECOMMENDATION: Approve action authorizing Mayor to execute retainer agreement with Tierra West as modified. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion by: Seconded by: to approve consent calendar items 5.1 through 5.18 and adopt Resolution Nos. through 6.0 PUBLIC HEARING 6.1 General Plan Amendment 4-91 and Change of Zone 9-91 (Henningsen) Location: Southwest corner of Esplanade and Santa Fe Ave. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends the Council take the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution No. approving General Plan Amendment 4-9,1 subject to Findings of Fact, and adopt a Negative Declaration. / tt RESOLUTION NO. ZG Z (� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, APPROVING AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE SAN JACINTO GENERAL PLAN FOR THE FIRST CYCLE OF 1992 5 2. Introduce (First Reading) Ordinance No. approving Change of Zone 9-91 subject to dings of Fact, and adopt a Negative Declaration. /'-tr. ORDINANCE NO. and waive full reading, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 9-91 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO 6.2 Change of Zone 10-91 - Lowell Zehnder Location: Northwest corner of State & De Anza RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends the Council introduce (First Reading) Ordinance No. and waive full reading, approving Change of Zpn 10-91 subject to Findings of Fact, and adopt a Negative Declaration. 1 -t ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 10-91 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO 6.3 Change of Zone 3-92 - Ma Williams Mobile Homes Sales Location: Southeast corner of State St. and De Anza Dr. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends the Council introduce (First Reading) Ordinance No. and waive full reading, approving Change of Zone 3-9;4 subject to Findings of Fact and adopt a Negative Declaration. t-^=1. ORDINANCE NO. 1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 3-92 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO 6.4 Soboba Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85 Amendment #1 (Rice Development) Location: Adjacent to Soboba Rd., North and South of Lake Park Dr. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council Adopt Resolution No. approving Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85, Amendment #1, subject to the Findings of Facts and conditions of Approval and determine that Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85 is consistent with the previously certified Environmental Impact Report originally prepared for the project. 6 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO APPROVING THE SOBOBA SPRINGS SPECIFIC PLAN (SPECIFIC PLAN 1-85) AMENDMENT #1 SUBJECT TO THE FINDINGS OF FACT, AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 6.5 Tract 24217 Amendment #1 - Rice Development Location: Southwest corner of Soboba Rd. and Lake Park Dr. (Village II) RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Tentative Tract 24217 subject to the Findings of Facts and Conditions of Approval and determine it is consistent with the Program Environmental Impact Report certified for Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85, and Amendment #1. 6.6 Tract 27402 - Rice Development Location: East side of Soboba Rd., North of the Easterly prolongation of Lake Park Dr. (Village VI) RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of Tentative Tract 27402 subject to the Findings of Fact and conditions of Approval and determine it is consistent with the Program Environmental Impact Report certified for Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85, and Amendment #1. 6.7 Tract 23729 Amendment #1 - Rice Development Location: Northwest corner of Soboba Rd. and Lake Park Dr. (Village III) RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of Tentative Tract 23729 subject to Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval and determine it is consistent with the Program Environmental Impact Report certified for Conceptual specific Plan 1-85 and Amendment #1. 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 7.1 Police Department MOU Amendment - Kozrna/Anderson RECOMMENDATION: Approve amendment to Police Memorandum of Understanding authorizing an alternate work schedule for police patrol officers for a trial period between March 26, 1992 and January 15, 1993. 7.2 Change to Animal Control Ordinance Concerning Use of Public Parks - Kozma RECOMMENDATION: Introduce, (First Reading) Ordinance No. and Waive the Reading in Full. 7 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE OWNERSHIP, LICENSING, VACCINATION, CONTROL, IMPOUNDMENT, RETURN TO OWNER, ADOPTION, EUTHANASIA, AND DISPOSAL OF ANIMALS, FOWL, AND OTHER NON -HUMAN SPECIES WITHIN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO 7.3 Graffiti Survey & Related Costs - Chadwick RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council consider removing all existing graffiti on both private and public property at City expense using the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds which are set aside for graffiti abatement (approximately $1,700.) Staff also recommends that all new graffiti on private property be abated using the City's nuisance abatement Ordinance No. 875 until the approval of the City Beautification Ordinance in May 1992. 7.4 City Pride Update - Chadwick RECOMMENDATION: Receive oral update 7.5 Memorandum of Understanding between BLM. Soboba Indians. City of San Jacinto and Intermac - McNabb RECOMMENDATION: Receive oral update 8,0 MAYOR/ COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS 8.1 League of Cities - Inland Division Boundary Change RECOMMENDATION: That the Council review the correspondence presented by the City of Yucaipa and share their thoughts on the proposal. 9.0 CLOSED SESSION 10.0 ADJOURNMENT Motion by: Vote: Seconded by: Action: to adjourn. I, Maurice Armster, do hereby certify that I caused to be posted the foregoing agenda this 13th day of March, 1992, as required by law. Maurice Armster, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk 8 3 HEMET VALLEY HOSPITAL DISTRICT . I lepnone: '052.2811 February 5, 1992 Mayor Francis Boykin City Hall 312 E. Main San Jacinto, CA 92583 Dear Mayor Boykin: As you know, Hemet Valley Medical Center is a dedicated facility in this community and is committed to bringing quality programs and services to the residents of San Jacinto. 3 - -iz. 1117 E. Devonshire Avenue HEMET, CAUFORNIA 92343 As health care and the preservation of health becomes a more prominent issue to the people of San Jacinto, our Medical Center has been increasingly involved in emphasizing health education and the importance of early disease detection. In light of this commitment, both to the community and to health education, Hemet Valley Medical Center will be participating in Health Fair Expo, April 4, 1992, celebrating better health for the community of San Jacinto and bringing its residents the opportunity to take advantage of free health screenings and education. Your support is needed in this community -wide effort sponsored by the American Red Cross, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., the Hospital Council of Southern California, Say -on Drugs, KNBC-TV, and Blue Cross of California. As Mayor of this city, your involvement in introducing a proclamation at the March City Council Meeting will draw attention and community support to the Health Fair Expo event. We also invite you to be the first person through our Health Fair Expo site as part of our opening ceremony on April 4, 1992. I will be in contact with your office within a few days to check on your interest in this proposal. Should you or your staff have any questions please don't hesitate to call me at 652-2811 ext. 5942. Sincerely, • ,e Terri Stewart, Site Coordinator Hetnet Valley Medical Center ' ' OCL 'TION Whereas, each individual has more control" over his/her health when each person assumes personal responsibility to promote and maintain a healthy Lifestyle; and hereas, Hemet valley Medical Center is conducting a Health Fair Expo event on April 4, 1992, coordinated by Hemet valley Hospital District Community Education; and hereas, Health Fair Expo celebrates its 15th year of community service, offering free health education and screening services that promote health Lifestyles; and "V ' itereaS, 9fealth Fair Expo screened 65,000 Southland residents Cast year, and over of a million residents in the past 15 years; and hereas, Health Fair Expo is sponsored by the American Red Cross, Chevron USA Inc., ABC-TV Channel4, Say -on Drugs, BCue Cross of California and the Hospital Council of Southern California. Now, therefore, be it proclaimed, that the San Jacinto City Council - congratulates Health Fair Expo, the sponsors, and Hemet valley Hospital District Community Education on this worthwhile project and encourages all residents to attend. Mayor Francis Boykin City of San Jacinto April 4, 1992 Date I. llealtliFair Expo .811.;}ff -L'iNII . . HEALTH FAIR EXPO P.O. Box 57930 Los Angeles, CA 90057 (213) 739-5266 Health Fair Expo Week April 3 through April 12 FACTS THE EVENT Southern California's Health Fair Expo is one of the nation's largest health fair events providing free health screenings and health information each year. It is made possible by the cooperative sponsor- ships of the American Red Cross, the Hospital Council of Southern California, Chevron USA Inc., ICNTBC-TV, and Blue Cross of California. In addition, Say -on Drugs joins the Health Fair Expo sponsor team this year and will provide major event funding. This year, the 15th anniversary of Health Fair Expo, more than 100 hospitals, malls, schools and other community organizations will participate as Fair sites in locations throughout Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura Counties the week of April 3 through April 12. Since its inception in 1978, Health Fair Expo has served well over three-quarters of a million Southlanders. THE FAIRS Every site has six basic screening stations: Health History, Height, Weight, Visual Acuity, optional Blood Profile, and Health Review and Referral. In addition to the Coronary Risk Assessment, a Thy- roid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) Screen has been added to the blood profile to evaluate thyroid function. In addition to these stations, all sites now feature the "Heart Learning Center" which includes activities and educational material on how to keep your heart healthy. The "Heart Learning Center," endorsed by the American Heart Association, includes a video presentation, a "-Iealthy Heanstyle" risk assessment, pulse taking and counseling on how to reduce your risk of heart disease. In keeping with changing wellness trends in the Southern California area, new learning centers for stress reduction and nutrition are included at all fairs. "Health Update '92" will also be present at all sites, providing the latest information and educational material on HIV/AIDS. Each site is unique and offers a variety of optional screenings which may also include Dermatology, Hearing, Podiatry, Dental, Glaucoma, Allergy Testing, Prenatal Information or a variety of other valuable, educational activities. An information referral service for seniors is also available at selected sites. HEALTH FAIR EXPO IS FOR EVERYONE Health Fair Expo sites are open to all Southern California residents and are absolutely free. All sites provide screenings for adults 18 and over, and many sites also screen and provide special activities for children over the age of 3. In addition, several sites are bilingual, catering to the special needs of many ethnic populations. All Health Fair materials are available in English and Spanish, and at specific sites, in Korean, Chinese and Japanese. FOR MORE INFORMATION... Beginning in March, Southern California residents can obtain information about Health Fair Expo sites in their area by calling the toll -free Health Fair Expo Hotline (800) 894-4999. American Red Cross Blue Cross C-somms KNBC-TV Chevron ccItet Hospital Council of Southam California • STAFF REPORT DA1E: March 17, 1992 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk SUBJEC, 1 : Minutes of Special Meeting February 25, 1992 AC1DAS 3 -9z. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes of the Special meeting of February 25, 1992, as presented. MINUTES JOINT SPECIAL MEETING BETWEEN THE SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUS FRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 25, 1992 1.0 CALL TO ORDER The Special Joint Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council and the Planning Commission was called to order by Mayor Boykin at 6:30 P.M. in the Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, California. Present: Councilmembers Ford, Leahy, Richards and Mayor Boykin Also Present: Commissioners Hixon, Iacono, Rutledge, Taylor and Chairperson Ver Plank Absent: Councilmember Hafliger A moment of silence was observed for reflection. The pledge of allegiance was led by Mayor Boykin. 2.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY None 3.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None 4.0 CONSENT CALENDAR None 5.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS None February 25, 1992 6.0 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 7.1 Preliminary Implementation Strategy and Conceptual Plan Main Street Area - GRC Consultants City Manager Easter gave a brief history and purpose of the plan, described the general information to be provided by the consultants, and the necessary direction needed to proceed. Community Development Director McNabb advised of the need for a broader perspective on image enhancement, redevelopment and design standards. Emphasized that the study took into consideration the City Council goals and objectives, city mission statements, and the priorities and recommendations of the 2010 Committee. Further, clarified that it was too preliminary to project revenues. Steve Copenhaver, GRC Consultants, gave some background on their firm and their specialties regarding RDA projects. Advised that considerable time was spent interviewing businesses of the Main Street area regarding new development, rehabilitation and design concepts. Introduced their staff. And finally, the project was just at the conceptual plan stage and if agreement was reached on the concept, staff could then incorporate it into a plan for implementation. Jennifer Thornberry, GRC Consultants, reiterated the goals of project as stated in the staff report; identified the study area as Main Street, between Jordan/Pico and Sixth/Third, with some additional opportunities just outside the study area between Fifth/Third and Alessandro/Jordan. Resource information utilized for the study included the Meyers Report, Main Street Reports and traffic reports by city staff. Issues looked at were; land use patterns, building conditions, ownership patterns and public improvement deficiencies. Identified the following areas surveyed with local businesses: Type of business Market area Hours of operation Future plans Changes desired Special training Seasonal/Constant How business was generated Interest in group advertising Customer and employee parking Individual expressions of concern Participation in special events Landlord responsiveness Type business preferences 2 February 25, 1992 Traffic circulation Type/Location/Time Limits of parking Need for traffic controls Other factors considered in looking at downtown were existing land use patterns, ownership patterns (for opportunities of significant development on single parcels), signage, landscaping and general appearance, building conditions (such as the many unreinforced masonry structures), parking availability, all of which lead to the opportunities and constraints of the area. Viewed the rehabilitation of the Vosburg as a major opportunity, as well as, some public improvements (signalization of Five Points), enhanced signage and street scape, elimination of nonconforming uses, mitigation of unreinforced masonry buildings (either rehabilitate or eliminate), and opportunities for new residential and neighborhood/commercial development. Steve Copenhaver presented the major constraint being the expansion of commercial areas, since it was an area serving the immediate neighborhoods and not a regional force. Advised that when viewing neighborhood service they must look at residential and help strengthen with new residential, suggesting such areas as the perimeter of the area south of Fifth street and north of the hotel property (suggested closing Third), and north of Main Street. Advised that the state law mandated a time limit for city to address unreinforced masonry buildings and suggested rehabilitation of the entire block where that condition existed, which would improve it aesthetically at the same time. Felt the area would become more remote unless it obtained an identity. Suggested unique street signs, street lights and street furniture. Parking now works well and if successful in upgrading intensity of businesses will need more parking and best to utilize parking in rear of commercial in public parking lots, need for anchor tenant reviewed and chose area on west side of San Jacinto Avenue and would require closure of Main Street (probably most difficult aspect and longest term project), an appropriate tenant would not locate in a free standing location realistically (something like Miller's Outpost) or go with something smaller. Maintenance of area suggested a property maintenance ordinance for the area. Public improvements needed curbs, gutters and sidewalks, future undergrounding of utilities and that is the concept, don't fight upstream, this most suitable not competitive with modern shopping centers. No one knows the optimum plan, can relate what has been successful in other communities. In response to Council and Commission inquiries, Mr. Copenhaver advised of the following: This plan, unlike others, is more of a strategy, and recommends if the City desires to pursue it aggressively that the RFP process be utilized and pursue RDA funding. 3 February 25, 1992 Believes that once the existing is reviewed, would want to consider expanding residential. Identified the Vosburg as unique and suggested taking advantage of that and not necessarily as previously used. Advised that outside agencies had not been contacted since this was not a specific plan. Mainly looked at what was needed for businesses to survive. Contact would come with review of the circulation element. Suggested opportunities to utilize public right-of-way for other things. Favored rehabilitation over demolition for unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings With regard to making the area strictly pedestrian, advised that very few had been successfully with that concept on anything except a special event. As for the width of the street being large enough for four lanes and a landscaped median, that would be possible. Explained that without a specific plan, more specific financial determinations could not be made. The results of the business survey indicated that the area would serve the local neighborhood and recommended that City Hall needed to exist on its own. Jennifer Thornberry explained that a majority of the businesses were tenants and not owners, as reflected in Exhibit 4. Further, owners are typically hesitant due to the lack of return on their investment on three year leases. Defined group advertising as those businesses close together or an entire area jointly paying for an ad. Staff, in response to Council inquiry, advised that there were time limits set by the state for URM identification, but not for compliance. Council and Commissioner suggestions as follows: Concerned that parking is a detriment and that design standards are needed. Would like more information on financial impacts prior to proceeding and the details for RDA funding. Suggestion that City Hall remain in that area. Obtain a fresh approach, beginning with a name change, correct parking situation, and add new facades (painted white and lit up). Cooperation from property owners needed, and preferred not to utilize eminent domain. Would like to see an estimated cost for a specific plan. Disappointed in the merchants responses. Would like to see such things as a financial institution, medical center, professional building to upgrade the area. Due to past perception that City was not involved in the improvement of the downtown area felt the Council should take the lead and enlist the support of the merchants and they would most likely follow. 4 February 25, 1992 City Manager Easter explained that this was just one piece of the overall project, establishing the RDA area and evaluating the financial needs of the various programs would come in a couple months. At that time the funding of programs, utilization of RDA increment for revenue participation note to raise capital would be reviewed, in addition to infrastructure which would enhance other areas, concurrently with the Main Street program. Presently staff is seeking input on interest in the concept. The program could be phased in and priorities identified and the alternatives and financial effects. Mayor Boykin called for public comments. Jeff Divine, believed the time was right now to improve the area. Advised that some merchants would like parking in the rear of their businesses. A tentative donation of property had been offered one block south of Main from the San Jacinto Parking Association. Felt the proposal would help to boost the local business in San Jacinto. Su.. ested something similar to what businesses did in Solvang, and that took unique shops, not large tenants. Mayor Boykin suggested a parking lot between Fifth and the Old Town Plaza to bring the two areas together. Bob Howe thanked Jeff Divine and the Association, also the college students who did the renderings. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Richards, seconded by Mayor Boykin to move ahead with a commitment and come up with a specific plan and all the items listed in the comprehensive plan; to review it piece by piece, come back for recommendations, and proceed to obtain authorization. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote. Staff advised that with each various program implementation would require authorization to amend the agreement. Originally approved about $15,000 and presently at or near that level. Would work with Mr. Divine on the details of the property donation and bring the matter back for Council action. 7.2 Presentation of Design Guidelines Community Development Director McNabb made a presentation on the history of the issue and emphasized the simple development process with the city as a selling point. This is merely a status report (Draft #3) and handed out the latest revisions. In response to Council and Commissioner inquiries, advised that all the necessary documents could be included in the informational packet. The process outlined is 5 February 25, 1992 based on the existing regulations. A table of contents would be added. It is not a comprehensive instruction, but rather a summary of information. As standards are developed it would get more specific on landscaping. Staff endeavoring to establish some uniform designs in specific areas, but ultimately is would be a Council decision. Some examples of specific areas to address are the superblocic, heritage area and the entryway to the City. There will not be individual handouts, the material will be contained in one bound manual. Staff will incorporate some simple drawings and fee schedule. Staff would work to implement a strategy for existing buildings. At the hour of 9:00 P.M. Councilmember Richards left the Council Chambers. At the hour of 9:01 P.M. Councilmember Ford and Commissioner Rutledge left the Council' Chambers. Lacking a quorum the Council recessed at 9:02 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 9:10 P.M. with all Council and Commissioners present except Councilmember Hafliger. Ken Kammeyer made a presentation on landscape architecture and gave some examples, i.e., Claremont. Would be coming back with some alternatives for establishing a policy. Showed the process to develop those standards, made a slide presentation on various locations within the City. Handed out a questionnaire for the Council and Commission to respond to. 7.3 General Discussion Staff seeking input on apartments, the goals and objectives, quality of life in apartments, property owner and tenant responsibility. Staff suggested an apartment association newsletter and clarified the ordinance requiring on site manager for more than 16 units. Planning Commission had been asking for consideration of limiting apartments to 16 units or more or less than four. At the hour of 10:00 P.M. Councilmember Ford left the Council Chambers. City Attorney Cox advised that it was within the City's policing power (so long as not too stringent) to regulate apartments and their maintenance, could even do so by way of a service fee for calls and disruptive matters. Suggestion for fencing was a consensus by the Commission. 6 February 25, 1992 Staff to prepare an overall ordinance and bring is back for consideration in approximately 90 days. Staff advised that the Annexation #66 Public Hearing on the EIR and change of zone would begin in late April and estimated the submission of application to LAFCO approximately early June. 8.0 MAYOR/COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS None 9.0 CLOSED SESSION None 10.0 ADJOURNMENT A MOTION was made by Councilmember Richards, seconded by Councilmember Leahy to adjourn. The hour of adjournment being 10:20 P.M. Commission Chairperson Ver Plank adjourned to February 26, 1992. Approved by Submitted by Maurice Armster, City Clerk 7 Francis R. Boykin, Mayor STAFF REPORT DA1B: March 17, 1992 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: Minutes of Regular Meeting March 3, 1992 '‘ 3 • Z.0.6 3-17-93, RECOMMENDATION: Approve the minutes of the Regular meeting of March 3, 1992, as presented. MINUTES SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SIFIING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUS TRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MARCH 3, 1992 1.0 CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order by Mayor Boykin at 7:30 P.M. at the Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, California. Present: Councilmembers Ford, Hafliger, Leahy, Richards and Mayor Boykin Absent: None A Moment of Silence was observed for Reflection The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Boykin Convened the Redevelopment Agency 2.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 2.1 RDA Senior Housing Program Assistant to the City Manager Anderson advised of the following changes to the agreement: Page 2 - Section 2 - Paragraph 1 - The correct amount should be $9,336.04. Page 2 - Section 2 - Paragraph 2 - Shall read in full "In no case shall total reimbursement under this contract exceed $9,336.04." Page 3 - Section 8 - Paragraph 1 - Shall read in full "The term of this agreement shall initially be from April 1, 1992 to March 31, 1993." Exhibit A - Should read "BUDGET PAGE 1992-1993" 1 March 3, 1992 A MOTION was made by Agency Member Ford, seconded by Agency Member Hafliger, to authorize additional funding in the amount of $4,336.04 from RDA fund 99-9700-5300, (Low/Mod housing fund) and authorized the Chairperson to sign contract as amended for the 1992 program year. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote. There being no further business the Redevelopment Agency meeting was adjourned. The hour of adjournment being 7:37 P.M. 3.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS None 4.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS John Padilla, thanked the Council and Police Chief Kozma for examining and improving the terminology relating to Latinos. 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR A MOTION was made by Councilmember Ford, seconded by Councilmember Leahy, to approve the consent calendar as amended and presented. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote. 5.1 Minutes of Special Meeting of February 18, 1992 Approved the Minutes of the Special Meeting of February 18, 1992 as presented. 5.2 Minutes of Regular Meeting of February 18, 1992 Approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 18, 1992 as presented. 5.3 Warrant Register Approved Warrant Nos. 27765 through 27902 dated February 28, 1992 in the amount of $369,378.75 as submitted by the Finance Director. 5.4 Treasurer's Report Received and filed the Treasurer's Report for the Month of January, 1992, as amended to remove the word "to" in the asterisk notation. 2 March 3, 1992 5.5 Elia Agreement for Storm Drain Improvements Tract No. 23860 Located South side of Seventh St. between Dillon and Ash Authorized the Mayor to execute the cooperation agreement between Elia Enterprises and the City and appropriate $80,000 from Flood Control Fund 39. 5.6 Easement for Agri -Empire Storm drain improvement for Tract 23860 Located on North side of Tenth St. between State St. and Santa Fe Ave. Accepted the storm drain easement from Agri Empire and authorized the City Clerk to record said deed. 5.7 Agreement for Management of Construction. Phase 2 of CFD #2 Approved the agreement with Peacock-Radaker Corporation for Management of Construction of Phase 2 of CFD #2 in an amount not to exceed $150,000 and authorized the Mayor to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. 5.8 Esplanade Multi -Family Project, Release of Regulatory Agreement (Esplanade Apartments Project) Authorized Mayor to execute the Release of Regulatory Agreement. 6.0 PUBLIC HEARING 6.1 18th Year CDBG Program Mayor Boykin advised that the public hearing was still open. Assistant to the City Manager Anderson, gave a brief summary of the criteria for such funding and identified the application process and those applications received. A Council Subcommittee met and developed criteria for the selection process and made recommendations (focusing mainly on new services providing food, clothing and shelter for the low income and handicapped, and abused) as follows: 1. T a Vista Alcoholism $3,421 2. Valley Restart $3,000 3. Alternatives to Domestic Violence $5,029 4. Phoenix House $3,250 3 March 3, 1992 Council consensus that future application processes would require statistics on the figures for service to San Jacinto residents. Clarification was provided that the Alternatives to Domestic Violence had recently established an extended service center at Farmer's Corner. With regard to RSVP, funding went to reimburse travel expenses for volunteer work. Bob Gemar, gave some background on the program Alternatives to Domestic Violence, having provided services since 1978, and in San Jacinto area 5-6 years. Police Department records showed 120-130 calls per year for San Jacinto. Thanked the Council for their consideration. Staff advised that the city portion of funding was proposed to continue the Senior Home Repair Program into next fiscal year 93-94 at the same level as the prior year. That type of funding was quite favorable to HUD, serving seniors and handicapped to provide repairs such as, roofing, windows and plumbing. Anticipated completing 85 repair jobs. If funding were to fall short due to inflation, the figures would be reviewed and revised. Public Works Director Evans gave a slide presentation. Advised that in past years funding was spent on underground projects such as sewer and water. This year it was proposed to make sidewalk repairs in older parts of town with the greatest impacts first. Slides depicted the areas to be covered. At the hour of 8:11 PM Councilmember Richards left the Council Chambers. Mr. Evans identified the many areas where sidewalks were cracked, buckled and missing. Staff felt these posed a hazard and would also make areas aesthetically pleasing and encourage pedestrians. Additional areas suggested by Council included north of Seventh to the Post Office, along San Jacinto Avenue between Main and Esplanade. Staff advised that those would be looked at to determine the benefit to the low and moderate income. There being no speakers to present testimony, Mayor Boykin closed the public hearing. At the hour of 8:20 P.M. Councilmember Richards returned to the Council Chambers. 4 March 3, 1992 A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember Ford, to approve the final CDBG project list for submission to Riverside County as presented and recommended. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote. 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 7.1 Image Enhancement Program - Chadwick Fire Chief Chadwick gave a quick review of the revised program, and focused on the upcoming events for March. Gave a status report on the neighborhood meetings set for the 24th and 31st, and a newsletter would be going out the following week. Recommended the Council set the date of April 14th for the City Pride Forum, at the College Theater. Staff would work out the logistics and bring back a confirmation at the next meeting. With regard to graffiti, staff clarified the City position as follows: The City presently had an ordinance on the books to deal with graffiti and could look at amending it after the neighborhood meetings and a determination of fiscal impacts. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Ford, seconded by Councilmember Leahy to authorize staff to form a City Pride Week Committee and set the date of April 14th for the City Pride Forum. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote. Request to add an item to the agenda: City Attorney Cox reviewed the Hemet ordinance and legislation, including San Jacinto's present code. With regard to authority to enter private property to abate graffiti, Mr. Cox considered it to be a problem not only statutorily, but case law limits government entities entering upon property. Reviewed the Hemet ordinance and basically the first portion, making illegal certain acts, was covered already in the penal code. The second portion on abatement procedures, he had some concerns, that there was no provision for appeal, which he felt to be unconstitutional. Presently the City code provided for abatement provisions including appeal and felt it was constitutionally firm, legally sufficient and not subject to challenge. Recommended that some amendments could be made to streamline the process, but would not be justified as an urgency ordinance. 5 March 3, 1992 Council discussion regarding seeking voluntary abatement immediately, suggested that a maximum of $5-7,500 of RDA funds be utilized to deal with blight (graffiti) and if a beautification ordinance was adopted, also provide the anticipated cost to abate. Opposing view that tax payers should not have to pay to cover up a social problem, should be the responsibility of property owners, and an estimated cost should be determined Suggested that the telephone number to call for abatement should be advertised. City Manager Easter clarified the direction from Council to provide a survey on existing graffiti problem and estimated removal cost in the next two weeks on necessary funding working with the Valley Teen Task Force and begin enforcing the existing ordinance. 8.0 MAYOR/ COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS Councilmember Leahy advised that the Firemen's Assn/Parkhill VIA breakfast would be Saturday, at the Community Center 7AM-1PM. The next Valley Gang Task Force meeting to be March 14th at Fruitvale Elementary, would be an all day session. Councilmember Hafliger advised of the ongoing meetings with the Valley Water Pumpers Assn. Councilmember Ford commended staff for presentations at the Study Session. Mayor Boykin thanked all those involved in the last heavy rains for their great job. Advised of the gnat catcher situation and no objection was voiced on the position Mayor Boykin intended to take at the WRCOG meetings. 9.0 CLOSED SESSION A MOTION was made by Councilmember Ford, seconded by Councilmember Leahy to convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (a) regarding the foreclosure on the assessment district. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote. At the hour of 9:05 P.M. City Council convened in closed session. At the hour of 9:17 P.M. the City Council reconvened in open session with all members present and no action being taken. March 3, 1992 10.0 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business A MOTION was made by Councilmember Ford, seconded by Councilmember Leahy to adjourn. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote. The hour of adjournment being 9:18 P.M. Submitted by Maurice Armster, City Clerk 7 Approved by Francis R. Boykin, Mayor STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor and City Council via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance Director SUBJECT: Approval of Register of Audited Demands and Payroll Checks DALE: March 17, 1992 RECOMMENDATION A • 3 11-9-- Approve warrant numbers 27903 through 28067 dated March 15,1992 in the amount of $ 293,950.17 and payroll check numbers 19341 through 19522 in the amount of $ 182,453.74 dated February 28 and March 13, 1992. SUMMARY A listing of accounts payable warrants is attached for your review and approval. Payroll is available for your review in the Finance Department. The following information is being provided due to the limited space on demands "Description". Check no. 28008 Tamara Gerard - were design services for Development Annual Report; Newsletter - Outlook & Neighborhood signs. the register of the Economic City Pride; and • if")1.;;:. •(•• • T kaif•J:,:11 Commission Commission Commission Commis s ion Commission oLLILD ;e:.441.111JJ',1 L1.11J'r, ,1141.1111,:*. HEET:e"N -iT ;.e.WHOOWL *INLHOP 1,1,Pe;-C1,[575-1 •••"1!1'1';e1--1Ii!".1"" 11.11116',•;11 PACKUIND 'J.,:i5f)ZEOU1 1511,1T. DLE11 flP"UIE F1R,1'.:1/!.511-1D RENFJ,j,.- 1E1-'11, jU3TICE ,11221.110.,::1 !!!!!1 1!--!,11!-d f!' ' !:;'f it!!!H !: !!! •"C 1'4.111-U4:1 5,1, Dnk1IDSCI' i (Jr: 1:1..UL1-1.0.,To1101 . , 11.fi‘11.11;',$11,11r- 1'1'01 C•rfei i2!'•'!:',„!!!!".1!!: •••'••••11),i'H....1.?••10. ••11i1'115'..5, 5C-5.50 e'14.95 !Th IL r-tt-W'r-1 HOUSE Ri.:-fMMEYER MASTERPLHH. LUMP fPUL.1'..: 0 RiLLCOM L.f.YorIUNDRAIR.O:INS GLE:ANTN5 LOT - •-YWRIF-1 RI-RH HETrP HOOP - ER Overpayment j. ,ILmcd,)11 *Prepaids !!!.2(,Y3 FUND 10 47,124.19 FUND 39 140,290.65 FUND 14 2,249.93 FUND 40 9,644.21 FUND 18 105.24 FUND 42 200.00 FUND 20 17,655.20 FUND 50 11,836.73 FUND 21 2,192.17 FUND 65 15,728.58 FUND 22 2,000.00 FUND 66 615.00 FUND 24 2,973.65 FUND 91 105.23 FUND 25 1,798.82 FUND 96 9,902.33 FUND 28 3,372.55 PAYROLL 19,260.69 FUND 29 30.00 FUND 32 6,825.00 FUND 35 40.00 TOTAL $293,950.17 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Les Evans, Interim Director of Public Works DAI E: March 17, 1992 5. a 3 -13 - SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID - POLICE DEPARTMENT PARKING LOT Recommendation: Award the contract to California Asphalt and Grading Company, Inc. of Fontana and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. Analysis: The City Clerk received bids on March 9, 1992 for the paving of the Police Department parking lot. Three bids were received as follows: California Asphalt S20,160.21 Matich Corporation 21,378.00 Gutierrez Construction 23,398.32 The low bidder has performed paving work in the City previously and is qualified to undertake our project. Funds for the project will be appropriated from the Police Facilities portion of the Mello - Roos account. a:#2Ies?dpkglot 3 - 17 - MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Les Evans, Interim Director of Public Works John Townsel, Water Superintendent DA1E: March 17, 1992 SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID - BATH WELL EQUIPMENT AND GRAND AVENUE BOOS 1ER PUMP Recommendation: Award the bid for the Furnishing and Installation of the Bath Well Equipment and the Grand Avenue Booster Pump to McCalla, Division of T ayne Western Company, Inc. of Redlands and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract on behalf of the City. Analysis: The City received bids on Wednesday, March 4, 1992 for the Bath Well Equipment and Grand Avenue Booster Pump. The bids received were as follows: McCalla, Division of Layne Company, Inc. - Redlands Beylik Drilling, Inc. Foothill Engineering $ 82,593.00 82,871.00 86,670.00 The low bid is McCalla. They are well known in Southern California and fully qualified to perform this work. Their bid of $82,593.00 is less than our budget estimate of $95,000 for this project. Funds for the equipment are available in Account 50-9000-5400. ,,b07.._,Q-0 a:#2lesbthwellbid STAFF REPORT DA 1E: March 17, 1992 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk SUBJEC I : Claim - Jeanette Rojas - File #JS 92-11 5 • to 3-17 -9 RECOMMENDATION: Reject the claim as recommended by the Claims Adjustor pursuant to Government Code Section 913. March 5, 1992 Pamela L. Lee, CMC Deputy City Clerk City of San Jacinto P.O. Box 488 San Jacinto, CA 92383 RE: Claims Acknowledgement and Loss Advice Dear Ms. Lee: COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY "EµrS 3\%1• MpR Sski We are in receipt of the claim filed against the City of San Jacinto by Victor Rojas, father of claimant Jeanette Rojas. Our office is also in receipt of the letter of representation from Kenneth A. Satin of Satin & Russell. At this time, we wish to inform you of our assigned file number: Claimant: Rojas, Jeanette Date of Loss: 02/02/92 Our Assigned File #: J8 92-11 We also request that you take the action indicated below: [X] CLAIM REJECTION: Written rejection of claim in accordance with Gwen o"oit Code Section 913. C] LATE CLAIN: Do NOT reject claim but RETURN it for failure to file within time limit prescribed in Government Code Section 911.2. Transmittal NOT to contain "WARNING" required by Section 913, but should advise that the recourse to file "Application for Leave to File Late Claim" as provided in Government Code Section 911.4. This must be returned within 45 days of the date claim mailed or delivered. [ ] INSUFFICIENT CLAIM: Send notice of insufficiency for failure to comply with Government Code Section 910 and/or 910.2 and/or 910.4 and cite the following specific insufficiencies: C] C] C] This must be sent within 20 days of your receipt of claim. MENDED CLAIN: Reject claim as set forth in first paragraph above, CLAIM REJECTION. APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE CLAIM: Reject the Application under Government Code Section 911.8. OPERATION OF LAW: Defer any written response pending our further advice. The above requested action should be addressed to the law offices of Satin & Russell. Please provide us with a copy of your rejection notice. If you have any questions, please contact the CVJPIA office. Sincerely, Scott Ellerbrock Claims Specialist cc: Jim Cox, City Attorney 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 200, Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 341-0492 FAX (619) 340-5949 FILE WITH: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 201 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 CLAIM FOR DAMAGLS TO PERSON OR PROPERTY PESEAvE FOR FILING STAMP CLAIM NG. INSTRUCTIONS 1. Claims for death, injury to person or to personal properly must be tiled not later than six months atter the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sec. 911.2.) 2. Claims for damages to real properly must be filed not later than 1 year after the occurrence. (Gov. Code Sea 911.2.) 3. Read entire claim form before filing. 4. See page 2 for diagram upon which to locate place of accident. 5. This claim form must be signed on page 2 at bottom. 6. Attach separate sheets, if necessary. to give full details. SIGN EACH SHEET 5" t 4 .y C031 EiF. L U J —CO VI TO: CITY OF SAN JACINTO Date of Birth of Claimant Name at Claimant _ ( �1��iE �C1N(r�tar��� ;N� 1r%r(�� Occupation of Claimant �t. .t,L-- Home Address of Claimant City and State Home Telephone Number Business Address of Claimant City and State Business Telephone Number Give address and telephone number to which you desire notices or communications to be sent regarding this claim: Claimant's Social Security No. _ 1 r% When id DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Date 4 -z - t i Time 4) If claim is 1nr Equitable Indemnity, give date claimant serve wut� t ne. complaint: Date tNames of any city employees involved in INJURY or DAMAGE Where did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Describe fully, ano locate on diagram on reverse side of this sheet. Where aopropriae, give sheet names and address and measurements from landmarks: is Describe in detail how the DAMAGE or INJURY occurred. t r r tl yy i r Why co you claim the city is responsiole? Describe in detail each INJURY or DAMAGE SEE PAGE 2 (OVER) THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE 28 The amount claimed, as of the L.zie of presenlat Damages incurred to date (exact): Damage to prcoeny S Expenses for medical and hospital care 5 Loss of earnings Special damages for g on of this claim, is computed as follows: Estimated prospective damages as far as known: Future expenses for medical and hospital care S_ "Future loss of earnings Other prospective soecial damages Prospective general damages Total estimate prospective damages g General damages Total damages incurred to date g Total amount claimed as of date of presentation of this claim: $ Was damage and/or injury investigated by police? 1 if so, what city? Were paramedics or ambulance called? t, It so, name city or ambulance It injured, state date. time, name and address of doctor of your first visit t� '�� to fit � � ‘1 11/ 1 , _ � t �.. � _: �.; -}- � t..-. WITNESSES to DAMAGF,or INJURY: List all persons and addresses of persons known to have information: Name `., t f +L7 i 0.%w4- " �;: — Address C \>c�r� }F-_ r t i7" 7 � .� Phone `/-(✓ i-�- L. Name L( ,1p-r'i-)t c- - Address Phone Name Address Phone N DOCTORS and HOSPITAL�S1: Hospital Doctor ; r\Z , Doctor %1 '- Address Address tdddress `') `' 'Cr G\' ryS Vag Hospitalized L 2 ctba`tr of Treatment - C - 'y -Z--_. Qlatr$ of Treatment -`:2. READ CAREFULLY For aft =ccident claims pia.e on toflowing diagram names of streets, or your vehicle when you first saw City vehicle: location of City v. inctudipp North, E?st, South, and West: indicate place of accident by "X" and by showing house numbers or distances to street corners. if City Vehicle was involved, designate by letter "A" location of City Vehicle when you first saw it, and by "B" location of yourself at time ci accident by "A-1" and location of yourself or your vent the time of the accident by "B-1" and the point of impact by "X NOTE: If diagrams below do not fit the situation, attach hereto a diagram signed by claimant. Signature of Claimant or person tiling on his behalf giving relationship to Claimant: Oat€ _m t i .,. fi_ _ (✓ L. r c f i- Jv f %i rc 1i s �i" NOTE CLAIMS MUST BE FILED WITH 6ITY CLERK (Gov. Code Sec. 915a). Presentation of a false claim is a felony (Pen. Code Sec Typed Name: 29 STAFF REPORT DAIL: March 17, 1992 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk SUBJEC I : Claim - Bert and Sandra Salva - File #JS 92-09 ijA • ti 3-ii RECOMMENDATION: Reject the claim as recommended by the Claims Adjustor pursuant to Government Code Section 913. March 5, 1992 Pamela L. Lee, CMC Deputy City Clerk City of San Jacinto P.O. Box 488 San Jacinto, CA 92383 RE: Claims Acknowledgement and Loss Advice Dear Ms. Lee: COACH ELLA VALLEY JOINT POWERS !NSURANGE AUTHORITY vt oc`6 Oi- We are in receipt of the amended claim filed against the City of San Jacinto by claimants Bert & Sandra Salva. At this time, we wish to inform you of our assigned file number: Claimant: Salva, Bert i Sandra Date of Loss: 09/15/91 Our Assigned File #: JS 92-09 We also request that you take the action indicated below: [XI CLAIM REJECTION: Written rejection of claim in accordance with Government Code Section 913. LATE CLAIM: Do NOT reject claim but RETURN it for failure to file within time limit prescribed in Government Code Section 911.2. Transmittal NOT to contain "WARNING" required by Section 913, but should advise that the recourse to file "Application for Leave to File Late Claim" as provided in Government Code Section 911.4. This must be returned within 45 days of the date claim nailed or delivered. [ ] INSUFFICIENT CLAIM: Send notice of insufficiency for failure to comply with Government Code Section 910 and/or 910.2 and/or 910.4 and cite the following specific insufficiencies: This must be sent within 20 days of your receipt of claim. AIEIDED CLAIN: Reject claim as set forth in first paragraph above, CLAIN REJECTION. APPLICAT'JN FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE CLAIN: Reject the Application under Government Code Section 911.8. OPERATIL Of LAY: Defer any written response pending our further advice. Please provide us with a copy of any response requested above. If you have any questions, please contact the CVJPIA office. Sincerely, i Scott Ellerbrock Claims Specialist cc: Jim Cox, City Attorney 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 200, Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 341.0E-2 FAX (619) 340-5949 19754 Wilson St. Riverside Ca. 92509 February 14, 1992 Laurie Maura, Deputy City Clerk, City of San Jacinto 201 E. Main St. San Jacinto, CA 92383 Dear Laurie Maura: This letter is to amend our claim for damages against the City of San Jacinto and others, dated January 23, 1992, to conform with the requirements of § 910(c) of the California Code. On Sunday, September 15, 1991 at about 9:30 a.m., we got up late and came to the kitchen where we had coffee and roll. We placed the dishes in the sink and while Bert leaned up against the pantry, Sandy opened the inner of the two kitchen doors while leaving the screen door unlocked. As Sandy was doing this, she saw what appeared to be a swat team running around the yard and said to Bert, "Bert look what's coming!". Bert had moved five or six steps towards the door when six to eight memhers of the fourteen to sixteen member swat team, some armed with automatic weapons, others with rifles and some with handguns drawn, opened the screen door to the kitchen and rushed into our home. One, a male, ordered us to "Get on the Floor! You are under arrest!". As they were pushing us towards the floor we were obeying the command. Sandy asked, "What for?". As Sandy and Bert were being handcuffed someone answered "for drug trafficking!". While we were lying on the floor handcuffed, police dogs were unleashed to roam throuhout the house. At some point shots were fired outside. We were left guarded by one male police officer while the rest of the intruders went outside. We remained handcuffed on the floor for about t-ne half hour when Bert asked if we could get up on the couch. Bert was allowed to put his pants on and us to get up on the couch. Bert repeteadly asked the officer to remove the handcuffs because his hands were hurting. The officer answered that he did not have the authority to remove the handcuffs. Bert rising from the couch said that if they were not removed he would go outside to seek the person who had the authority to remove them. The officer pushed Bert down saying that if he did not stay down he would push him down and that if he went outside Sandy would have to go out in her night clothes in front of the Mexican Americans that had been gathered outside by the swat team. These remarks upset Bert who attempted to get up only to be pushed down by the guard. At about 11:30 a.m. someone from among the invaders, with apparent autjority, gave the order to release us. Our handcuffs were removed. We were then shown a search warrant to which Bert exclaimed, Now you show it to us?. Members of the team remained behind on our property until about 5:30 p.m. of that day.'\ This action by members of the San Jacinto Police Department, The U.S. Border Patrol and oosibly other Federal, State and Local governmental agencies violated the claimants rights under the Constitution of the United States, the Constitution of California, and several federal and California state statutes, for which violation the claimants herein demand a redress from the parties responsible, personally and severaly in their capacity of responsibility. Said redress owed tous from the City of San Jacinto and any individual therefrom whether owed personally or by the doctrine oi respondeat superior would be satisfied by a tax free lump sum payment to claimants herein in the amount of Z400,000.00 (FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS, with interest thereon froff, the 15th day of September 1991. SANDRA SALVA Claimant BERT SALVA Claimant STAFF REPORT AGENDA 5 • 3 - /7 -fy, March 17, 1992 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: Claim - Ruth Forkner (County of Riverside) - File #JS 92-08 RECOMMENDATION: Reject the claim as recommended by the Claims Adjustor pursuant to Government Code Section 913. COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY March 10, 1992 Pamela L. Lee, CMC Deputy City Clerk City of San Jacinto P.O. Box 488 San Jacinto, CA 92383 RE: Claims Acknowledgement and Loss Advice Dear Ms. Lee: We are in receipt of the amended claim filed against the City of San Jacinto by the County of Riverside, Risk Management Division, for the injuries sustained by their employee Ruth Forkner. Our file number remains the same: Claimant: Forkner, Ruth (County of Riverside) Date of Loss: 09/10/91 Our Assigned File #: JS 92-08 We also request that you take the action indicated below: [X] CLAIM REJECTION: Written rejection of claim in accordance with Government Code Section 913. [] LATE CLAIM: Do NOT reject claim but RETURN it for failure to file within time limit prescribed in Government Code Section 911.2. Transmittal NOT to contain "WARNING" required by Section 913, but should advise that the recourse to file "Application for Leave to File Late Claim" as provided in Government Code Section 911.4. This must be returned within 45 days of the date claim mailed or delivered. [ ] INSUFFICIENT CLAIM: Send notice of insufficiency for failure to comply with Government Code Section 910 and/or 910.2 and/or 910.4 and cite the following specific insufficiencies: This must be sent within 20 days of your receipt of claim. MENDED CLAIM: Reject claim as set forth in first paragraph above, CLAIM REJECTION. APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE CLAIM: Reject the Application under Government Code Section 911.8. OPERATION OF LAD: Defer any written response pending our further advice. Please provide us with a copy of any response requested above. If you have any questions, please contact the CVJPIA office. Sincerely, :0.4-6141V4— Scott Ellerbrock Claims Specialist cc: Jim Cox, City Attorney 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 200, Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 341-0492 FAX (619) 340-5949 STAFF PORT • ee-ei 3-1")-ly To: Honorable Mayor & Council Members via City Manager From: Chief of Police ,1 Date: March 9, 1992 Subject: Acceptance of Donated Property for Hofmann Park RECO I 1 NDATION: Accept on behalf of the City of San Jacinto all donated property listed by Resolution for use in Hofmann Park CO 1 1 NTS: On behalf of the many donors of the property listed on the attached Resolution for use within Hofmann Park, it is recommended Council, accept on behalf of the City of San Jacinto the donated property. Much time and effort has been expended through the efforts of the many donors to set in place a lasting memorial for family members, friends, or for those who have done so much for the City of San Jacinto. This token of appreciation on behalf of various family members and friends should last as a reminder that those who gave of themselves in an efforts to make a better quality of life for all of us in San Jacinto are not forgotten. Should you have any questions I make myself available to address your concerns. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ACCEPTING DONATED PROPERTY FOR USE WITHIN HOFMANN PARK. WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto from time to time may receive donations of various items to be used by the City for the enjoyment of the community residents; and WHEREAS, the City under current law is authorized to accept such donations on behalf of the City. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of San Jacinto accepts the following donated items: Description Value One (1) Gazebo 10,030 Five (5) Purple Leaf Plum Trees 1,000 One (1) 30' Flagpole 1,084 One (1) Bronze Plaque 283 Three (3) Park Benches 684 One (1) 5'X10' American Flag 1.141ndual Two Hundred Seventy Five (275) (approximately) Red Bricks 12,375 One (1) California Flag One (1) Table w/Benches 500 One (1) Sycamore Tree [Aran MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 1992, by the following note: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk Mayor STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: March 17, 1992 SUBJECT: Request for Bond Reduction for Tract 24713 A • ►o • 3-i7 -9y APPLICANT: Jenel Development LOCATION: North side of Idyllwi►d Drive, 1500 feet east of State Street RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council reduce the respective bonds as follows: 1. Sewer and Water by 90 percent from $208,000 to $20,800 2. Streets by 75 percent from $232,000 to $58,000 Additionally, direct the City Clerk to notify the following agencies/individuals: 1. Jenel Development 1608 S. Vineyard Ave. Ontario, CA 91761 2. Insurance Company of the West 1111 E. Katella Avenue Suite 250 Orange, CA 92667 BACKGROUND On March 10, 1992, a Public Works inspection was conducted of the aforementioned project which determined that the majority of the public improvements were completed. The following are outstanding and need to be completed: Street cap, street fog seal and blue dot markers. Therefore, it is justified to reduce the improvement bonds as indicated above. Respectfully Submitted, BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DA I L: March 17, 1992 SUBJECT: Request for Bond Reduction for Tract 24330-1 A5'145•)"7 A 3-17 -9 APPLICANT: Windward Homes LOCATION: North side of the Ramona Expressway at Chase Street RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council reduce the off -site improvement bond by 85 percent from $925,160 to $138,774. Additionally, direct the City Clerk to notify the following age ncies/individuals: 1. Windward Homes 2950 Airway Ave. Unit A-15 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 2. lnsco/Dico Group 333 Wilshire Anaheim, CA 92801 BACKGROUND On February 26, 1992, a Public Works inspection was conducted of the aforementioned project which determined that the majority of the public improvements were completed. The following are outstanding and need to be completed: Street striping, blue dot markers, street monuments and landscaping along the Ramona Expressway. Therefore, it is justified to reduce the improvement bonds as indicated above. Respectfully Submitted, BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development 5 .)0 •3 STAFF REPORT 3 -I? TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DAIL: March 17, 1992 SUBJECT: Request for Release of Certificate of Deposit for Tract 25099 APPLICANT: P.A. Cassel LOCATION: East of Vernon Avenue, at Second Street RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council release the $8000 Certificate of Deposit for the maintenance guarantee of public improvements for the above referenced project. The one period since acceptance of the improvements will have elapsed on March 20, 1992. Additionally, direct the City Clerk to notify the following agencies/individuals: 1. P.A. Cassel P.O. Box 6888 San Diego, CA 92106 BACKGROUND On March 20, 1991 the city accepted the public improvements for the above referenced project. The applicant posted an $8000 Certificate of Deposit to cover the one year maintenance period. At this time, the public improvements are good condition and no repairs or maintenance are necessary. Therefore, it is justified to release the Certificate of Deposit in its entirety. Respectfully Submitted, BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: March 17, 1992 AL-A-6\iDA5 -1"-5" 3•17-ely SUBJECT: Request for Release of Bonds for Tract 12152-1, Tract 22882-1 and Tract 24745 APPLICANT: Forecast Homes RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council release the bonds for the above referenced tracts as the maintenance period since acceptance of the improvements has elapsed. Following is a list of the Tracts and the respective bonds: 1. Tract 12152-1 (Landscape Restoration) Bond #982944S 2. Tract 22882-1 (Subdivision Improvements) Bond #977149S 3. Tract 24745 (Sewer Improvements) Bond #200746S Bond #200748S (Water Improvements) Bond #200747S Additionally, direct the City Clerk to notify the following agencies/individuals: 1. Forecast Homes 10670 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 2. The Insco/Dico Group 333 Wilshire Anaheim, CA 92801 BACKGROUND At this time, the public improvements for the above tracts are good condition and no repairs or maintenance are necessary. Therefore, it is justified to release the bonds accordingly. Respectfully Submitted, ( ' BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: March 17, 1992 3-17-�y SUBJECT: Request for Bond Release and Reduction for Tract 22950-3 APPLICANT: California Ranch Homes LOCATION: South side of De Anza Drive, generally east of Palm Avenue and west of Potrero Street RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council accept the public improvements release/reduce the respective bonds as follows: 1. Release Monument Bond in its entirety 2. Release Labor and Materials Bond in its entirety 3. Reduce Performance Bond to 10 percent to a sum of $24,498.80 Additionally, direct the City Clerk to notify the following agencies/individuals: 1. California Ranch Homes 255 N. Gilbert Street, Suite C-3 Hemet, CA 92542 2. Brown and Bacher P.O. Box 3479 Hemet, CA 92546 BACKGROUND On March 10, 1992, a Public Works inspection was conducted of the aforementioned project which determined that the public improvements were completed. Therefore, it is justified to reduce the performance bonds as indicated above and retain ten percent for any needed maintenance to be released one year from the date of acceptance. Additionally, it is appropriate to release both the monument and labor and material bonds. Respectfully Submitted, BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development 3 - CITY OF SAN JACINTO STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: March 12, 1992 SUBJECT: FINAL TRACT MAP 22347 APPLICANT: Larry Maddox P. 0. Box 2548 Hemet, CA 92543 LOCATION: .11 East of Palm Avenue, South of Cottonwood Avenue, North of Seventh Street, West of Grand Avenue RECOMMENDATION Staff and the City Engineer have reviewed Final Map 22347 and found it to be in substantial compliance with the Conditions of Approval and Subdivision Map Act. The applicant has elected to install the public improvements prior to recordation of this map. These improvements have been inspected and accepted. Therefore, they are only subject to warranty security which has been posted as a Certificate of Deposit. Staff recommends the Council approve Final Map 22347 and authorize the Mayor to execute signature of Final Map for recordation and accept the Certificate of Deposit as the warranty effective February 24, 1992, to be held for twelve months. Respectfully submitted, / / // A_ BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development BKM:lr ti IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUI Y OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT MA, NO . 22347 BEINB A SUBDIVISION OF A POOTIOI OF FAPN LOT ISA OF THE LAWS OF TIC SAN JACINTO LAND ASSOCIATION. AS !NON BY NAP ON FILE IN BOON B. PANE 357 OF NAPS. IECOBIB OF SAN DISCO COIi1TY. CALIFORNIA K.B. COZAD AND ASSOCIATES, INC. JUNE 1990 i) la 17 lI-Y DI"/T" 60O4/ ]3cb _ FIo ]i00 5 _... IF-.1S4WJXSC i e/ ff,v2r PSJR WTP/ ✓.Il,,, 24 9g 25 oa 26 8 8 I � TJ P5 LOT vef'J9'. INVESTOR 29 oye J PLACE IP/ I (1'69 'if 28 454/446F Boo 29 1 1 1 1 h 1 11 1 1 1 1 .1/:� / v2.e�w L. t J ' 4 \%, \. , /'P 4/ @� ,-0, N f9,4�� 9.00 07 ) SEVENTH DETAIL NO. 5[4GP !SETT P4ii AnrAv. x- 2 2B CO 0-0 v w/ s - �r NOTE: SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR PROCEDURE OF SURVEY, MONUMENT DESCRIPTIONS AND ENGINEER`S NOTES. CURVE DATA LENEIN NO RADIUS DELTA TANGENT SO 00' S1•54"05" 39 SA" /5 Ld (6) iota' SS•L8'0/" 40.40' 26.2AT A. 50. OA' u4't' '9" 99. L8' TAA6 " \8) 1DO0 77'51%AS AY)6 AO. wb- (9) 5000' !9'S4W• 29.58" /524' o) 5000' /D'd6'32" 9.40' 4.92' II W.OJ' U'Oe 5.5.' I'/.'/f' 6.®9' Ix) 4d 'O TI`sO.ti aLpa S1.ST' �2 T6.m H•I,'ao' 1®.A5' e.6W (I,) T. W' M-ao' I2• ee.AA' 435,5' SCALE IN1tE / A a Nv. warm. 13A ISO INS. Nv Ia. (All I) SC a-T. IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT MAP NO. 22347 57, WINS A ISAIDISISION OF A PORTION OF FAA.' LOT 154 OF TIE LAWS OF THE SAN JACINTO LASO ASSOCIATION. AS SHOWN St MAP ON FILE IN BOPS B. PACE 397 OF MAPS RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTS CALIFOONIA K.B. COZAD AND ASSOCIATES, INC, JUNE 1990 64 51 49 9 Se" cr ger erg e E 507,59 5 5I/O4 .5 Co 2 3 4 5 8 6 a1..`1 ?111 :16 O-7.• 7700 77JO ' - ' 4,-, D, a, .1.7,,6, 5 ..." ,,,,, .< ,e ,,,,,,, 5 f 15,56g 5 5" :5 ;.5 :5 ,. 7 " 8 !To 9 , IC;:,„ 114 ; ?Z 1.1 ,..°., ,i,,, Al P",' , ." 2, hj . K ' ..4. .i!,,. A T. .. iv, 'or "leg 7700' 7700 rg, ,,:11""' 10 LOT "8" See.J9 9,0 ,tr 77E9 .99 ,_._ ' 6.1 ENTERPRISE AVENUE L,C,„,,, ." 7J Ce >SW 7155, .5 35-31 "--- EL -5 I_ , ry eveceerreS /Of ze S r cog", 0 5 ca, ZS 0' certe 5 e Arc r 3 L L F99 9 L- F . —5,chre Seder 5 ,S.15, Nese re rgr re/ 2e5 4' 55 ALLIol L9 .9 , Icrr Orc Pee v e re 5 re :u :',' S '1. '-4 o 2. 8i, 621 1,, 70 8g 19 8 18 , 17 3o• 1 2, 15 op 14 • , 13 12 ...1 . , „,,, , r• os 11. S H 755, fgerg! II 25 29 77 11 1 SEE SHEET P/C 4 75 29 5 NOTE: SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR PROCEDURE OF SURVEY, MONUMENT DESCRIPTIONS AND ENGINEER'S NOTES. CURVE DATA HAD/US DELTA LEN676 6106665 333age l 06'13'37- Ji 65 16 2) 333 00 69..16.51" 52.715 Sd 3A1C,L5 °JO " 81 56 41.09" 26756 15'34' 25' SCALE IN PEE, =One. EWE Wes Mi. FM WV TAN' Se e_ IN THE CITY •O /b- eA 9.P .ON I50' UAW, 'ACC 0.1I"0E1a/0' 154/00Y3. ACC(/7£055 NN M( F400 (CT /M &ILA 4No 41 vr((A F 4YIFA5(fl?V. Pm''a0.m. Cd ,l 7 FA. /j9E2AlP. AV AB9 M/P.'Y CO. Sims MO lEDME Ca qe. r10/9s, MD /(5/53 -50 Me /36/XS-PS AZEIP/BPSS SA, [AP. M(M (Ar/sd, S.J. L.X. % A5 SEEKS, IAVI705EC,700. s£rr (- Rue /V/ MCA ar39TH!( Ix' IEEE_ OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT MA.NO . 22347 SAN JACINDAI,OOLLIJOIASSOCIATTONA TICEAS OF WENN FARM LOT I34 ON OF TIEE LANDS OF TTE 04 KOOK B. PAGE 337 OF NAPS. ILCOR25 OF SAN 0IEG0 CORNY. CALIFORNIA. K.B. COZAD AND ASSOCIATES, INC. JUNE 1990 COTTONWOOD AVENUE PROCEDURE OF SURVEY RACT NO. 13364 ti1.S. 11 a/ //%///,LO /%i SEVENTH rnfl 95 67) 6-4 51 j.Y 481 r/ I \} c :w /rzT r o ENTERPRISE LOT B //ANVSTCff? PLACE (Q° AA, a STREET e A6/iv, / a r460{P (.s 9045 re/Le:LW Z.3 9P42 /(A A/.l '40/ e3 90, J aCC / Meaf.J 5 1't y /" i • \ 7 _�aj r 0\.0 Q• r ,trvrn, F, Marwn err .FP: r.,,C PA11}'aa. EA M-.Oe3' M/ROT, p. 9PP(!(r row KP PM, so -/F p 405 /4R/M-H ACCEPT(e JI 'WEE (4rILENETSS( ser rr r MAm,Ta(R AT 51000CE w/rw t' 9-r((5 SHEET 3 OF 5 SHEETS ENVIRONMENTAL y��,C()CSaTRAINT NOTE L TTHHE DERIFRATEED MILL FLOOD ZONE • PL000 PLAN FEN•R IA ISSUED Pi ACCORD- ANCE RITE ORDINANCE RE3. ENGINEER'S NOTES pENV1�P-O IJ1 � L- NEL t.'9t rr., T1ry 1 2. I VOI F Cc2A3T' 3. n 2. CouLl1-v aezlo6iG repo ri- U1 , Ovu/as rent uol da}ecl - asuu z 41 Dirt -For veer+ reco w wl +ltn -Po l l aw Rub : A. F srsef ef-rucitors an ♦his royci- s1A4ll i02 ciPswO!Lcd causi(ten tGe_ se1}mlc 5. Tice wilannA etrloba 1.-knna, bacYCill s(ati k� rerc "^Fr=` -Far -Fklz Pu I I INDICATES ;OLEO NOPUI€NT AS NOTED INDICATES MONO 3' 0.0. IFKIN PIPE. FLUSH TAGGED P.C.E. 14232' TN LIEU OF 2' 0.0. IIOH PIPE PER H.0.155J24-25. INDICATES SET STREET SURVEY IATTAATENT PpEEpp CITY OF SAN JACINTO STANDARD N-6U41TYPE'A'I INDICATES SET 24' X 2' 0.0. IRON PIPE KITH ILNC CORE TAPPED 'L.3. 4104' SET FLIER. INDICATES RECORD AND 16E5011E0 DATA PER NAP BOOK 156/24-25. INDICATES RECORD Alp >EASUPEVOATA PEA NAP BOO( 113/55-50. SET NAIL ME 'L•4pM' TAG IN CURS AT PPROLONGAT 211O F SIDE LOT LINES IN LIEU OF S. SET 1' 0.D. IRON PIPFI TARGED'L•4N0t FLUSH OR LEAD AND TAA L L 404' SET NI CONCRETE FOOTING OR ow TOP OF "maw e u Sd 1 WALL AT ALL REAR LOT COWERS AND CORNEA COTRAGN Po1NIS 4L.A.' INDICATES SAN JACINTO LAND ASSOCIATION. 13/357. SAN 0IEG0 CORNY RECORDS. THIS NAP CONTAINS 11.0? ACTED CROSS. -LI NRACATES'AE°FLOOD ZONE. IS OF BEARINGS SIT OF FFAIN LOT R13544. S.J.L.A. TAKEN ASS NORTH PEA T NO. 19129-1. NAP ROOK 156/24-25. cleP-f.In D7 +he +ratan prior arm -NOTE 'EVENT IN FAVOR OF EASTERN IONICIPAL WATER .-�-o �� 6-1-�VL J 614 O (I aN TRICT FOR SEWAGE TUPS1ISOTON AS RETISM K s-i'tkdt4 -Ye5 ors!-l+r ii ou I'Nq tie f�Qtnc%1• This cot-ufl-JloysI�aII Irk J otccaklpflg "1 Greed 4a ctud + LQ ;!,shoe{-loti �,y 1-q i C 1J1 60i 15 +ter. 90.25. RECORDED JUL? 24. 19pi . 0.P. VICINITY MAP 40 5(4(( IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT MAP NO. 22347 { SJJACi15RODLAND lON ASSOOCC IA I ION. AS SHOtN ST A PORTION OF FARM NAP OF TEE FILE INLAWS BOOR S.P GE 39I OF NAPS. RECORDS OF SAN OIERT) [MEN. CALIForNi . K.B. COZAD AND ASSOCIATES, INC. JUNE 1990 TRUSTEE CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY. A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION. TRUSTEE 1*0ER DEED OF ti9P'T RECORDED MAY 29. 1891 A5 INSTRUMENT No ITSAIT. PREZ IDEXT �,Kt'AAY NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA as COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ON THIS A�O'�'iY AY OF 19S I. BEFORE ME AND FOR SAID ST NNONN PE0NCNOE/RPORACUTEEXN ETEE 1N$ST. S.IPERSONALLT }iaOETEAEONOFDTErtENITE mtl£RETN N+.61TRTPRSKNONLE1 0E0UffESKCYdKY EVIECEM/BE NY C IAIiSSION EXPIRED 4-22-4A( I0,Xl1L N4 ERLfN TOUNG TARP PU IUFAI ATM OFFICIAL SEAL FOR 9AI0 STATE SHEET 2 (IF 5 SHEETS NOTICE OF ELEortON E=Y L4trb 171U I I7ER Tb VEFEFZ PAYM EtuT O F FEES trance 15 f+>=�Ee,Y ErivEN I7lV G m EL rJ=b To to le PAYIM OF e INITI�rtr(�►JlTl- vt/ F ES TO TH-E TIME OF I::::"C,UAJUGE OF A 131-1ILM5 FFIZ llr 5.61117 PARC -5 MAT TEE ouvNEFz OF t=A5 4 , AT T I lti1 E O 1= I SS L{,41{1GE O FA t Lfl L©ltJ PE12:w11T1 St��4LL gE �EiCp 'Eb Td PAY THE FEE ( 1 c? AT ThE E E ,4T I H— IE OF (SSLl44-UlGE O F Tt l E AGTt,{AL uP` L tT FO Iz -NE F z) L-LO w t A1VD SIE�4U4LIz'1rlojFF�6. 2. PUF-)1AG �4 P FEES, IN THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTOF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CAL1rUHNIN TRACT MA.. NO. 22347 K.B. OWNER'S STATEMENT WE HEREBY STATE THAT NE APE SHE OWNERS OF TIE LAND INCE/CFO WITHIN THE SLERIVISION SHOWN HEREBY. THAT WE ARE TIE ONLY PERSONS WHOSE NE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS A CLEAR TITLE TO SAID LAND: CONSENT TO THE RAKING 4W [ECRIOINR OF THIS SUDDIVISION HAP AS SHOWN WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE. WE HERESY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO FOR PUBLIC USE FOR STREET AND UTILITY FIBPOSES LOIS A° THROUGH '0'. WE ALSO DFAINARE AND WATER EASEIENISDAS ISHOWN THEREONCITY OF BAN JACINTO TIE T.N.N. ENTERPRISES. INC. A CALIFORNIA CORPORAT RE: EN- TRUST ED .ME 5. 1972. Klwim+ - }n dyJ°ibI 6�TNY—TWISi� WILLIAM A. FECUND. TRUSTEE AS TRUSTEES OF TIE DOROTHY S Dl,Tie'J7)1NE 27.199D_ TA LIMA R. Ye NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE O CAE IFOMIAI AA CORNY OF R/IIVVEHSIOE DAY BEFORE NE /NIP FOR SAID ST ALLY APPEARED y��Q ,X�� PERSONALLY NWNN TO IE/PRT)VE a 9g"bY 9S CTNY EVIDENCE TO SE TIE PERROHS NW EXERTED TIE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AS PRESIDENT OE SECRETARY EXECUTED COP ORATISN T IN IAMB,, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TWT TIE NY cIMSIISSION EXPIRES A' 2K.T.- NITIESS MV HAW AW OFFICIAL SEAL Ptik4•LFC. P NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ESTATE QF CALIF04THIA10e COUNTYY OFr,dRRIIVEEGSIITEEIp OI TH,ki F 1217 , iNtsraber RP rd 1991. BEFORE ME A NOTARY IN AND FOR SAID STATE PERSONALLY APPRISED JOSEPH D. PEN.. DOROTHY 9. SEAR- JAMES A. POHEIIOY. WILLIAM A. RECORD ATE JAMES T. YOABPOWO AS TRUSTEES PERSONALLY KNOWN TO NO/PROVED TO IE ON THE BASIS OF INSTRUMENT. ANDDIACNCE II BE KNOWLEDGEDTHE PERTO WE TTNHATAT TIEYMO EEXECUTTEEDIHE WITHIN THP SATE. 2-at-44' NY COMMISSION EXPIRES NIRESS MY HART AND OFFICIAL SEAL E51#43L1O. 9IHATE/TOP Sd IO 9TATL SAINT A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION O FNMA LOT 1B4 OF TIE LANDS OFTHE DE/ SAN MTO LAND RECORDS OF5SANATION. AS DIEGO CE NIY. IICALIFORNIRBY MAP ONI ILE IN BOOK 8, COZAD AND ASSOCIATES, INC. JUNE 1990 TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE fECOFOO OF THIS OFFICE. AS OF THIS DATE THERE ALE NO LIENS AGAINST TIE PROPERTY MOTE ON THE WITHIN NAP FOR NVAID STATE CORNY, MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES. ENDEPF-4AMEO'9915 p „.. rW....&.aq_.. SG..LEB_EO 0 F ES I.O, A LIE' B"' MI YET B ATED:.a° "— A^' .&. 1991 BY: I HERBY EXECUTED . CALIF STATE. COUNTY PUNIC2 COLLECTED AS TAXES. WHICH THE COUNTY ACCEPTER ATE A L PAYABLE AND SAID BOND HAS SUPERVISORS. '-.. nntffiW OF RYqA NA irs O.EtYDD c A31EFI9OL5 DDUATY iA%DROP -OMIT BY. ISIX1 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL K STREET XED NAP ARE HEREBY ATE PPPROVEDH1 UTILITY 5ARFIENi6OAT OFTHE O9 _WITHIN A C TAX COLLECTOR DEPUTY BOND CERTIFICATE T A TAX BOO IN TIE SW RP 9 ITN TIE BOARD Of SUPERVISORS CpOITIONED IKON TIE PATIENT DR LOCAL AND ALL SPE-""' TIlE OF FI HAS I/TY AXES. _ ASSESSMENTS Of THIS NAP WITH VEIT BYSAIO BOARD OBUT Hui YFI SOIL REPORT A PRELIMINARY SOIL REPORT MAX PREPARED BY ISLDO FOUNDATION ERDINEERIPO. INC. ON TIE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEWER 1990, AS REQUIRED BY THE FEALTY AM) SAFETY CODE OF CALIFORNIA SECTION 17933 NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT W1ILTS OF CALIFOIAIAIPW ICOMIY DF RIVERSIDE OM THIS O`Y 1: EA AI��b(! _. 199I.�BEF YR It F� SA IO SIAIL YCNOUnnLL' OC .a11t Y PERSONALLY KNOWN IC RE/PNOV EVIDENCE TO OE TIE FERSOLR WNO EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRRENI, AHD ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT TILT EXECUTED TIE SAME - MY COMIISSION EXPIRES a.SO-9S WITNESS NY HAW AND OTICIA. SEAL '(C"T{(AND HE SAID STATE RECORDER'S', ATEMENT FILED THIS DAY 0" 1002. AT PABE __, AAT RIE fSDEST OF TIE CITY DUET NO. FWIlIll.TAM E. CONNEA.Y.—NASTY RECO+DER BY. DEPUTY SIIYIIVISION SUARANIEE FIRST MERICAN TITLE CO. CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT THIS MAP C'OFOM9 MOTH THE REDUITEAENTS OF THE 15E09vI91ON HAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCES. I HEREBY STATE THAT TNIS MAP HAS BEEN EXAMIIEO BY NE OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AM) FOND TIT RE SUBSTANTIALLY TIE DAME AS IT APPEARED DPI TIE_ TENTATIVE TRACT NAP NO. 22347 FILED. ADE1�➢ ATE APAPPROVED BY CS M PLANNER CCO COMMISSION ON MAY 0. 11187. AID THAT DATED: ✓^u. Z7, 9Pf2 ACTIHD'TIIY ETDitFFll SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT "a"wi' I HEREBY STATE THAT I AN A LICENSED LAND SUMYEYOR OF THE STATE Of CALIFORNIA AND THAT THIS NAP CO619TIW OF B SHEETS CORRECTLY rEPREBEN TS A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION DIMING MAY OF IIBT: THAT ALL NOSNENTS SHOW HEREON ACTUALLY EXIST ANO THEIR POSITIOB APE CORRECTLY SHOWN DR WILL BE IN PLACE WITHIN ONE YEAR FROM THE RECORDATION 9092 EOAcTIO PTIE THE SURVEY ISTWILL BCIHI ETEI ASROTEROTE EARLE THE DATED: RED 2.4 1991 MANUELtMT"2YA'C MANTEL N. N002A L IO PEGISTRATIDN EXPIRES 5-50-92 CITY ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT THE CITY IF RAN JACINTD CORNY IF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIF DO ITS DULY AURA:TRUED OFFICERS. HEREBY ACCEPTS SUBJECT INSTALLATION OF FOR STREET WOPUBLIC UI�TILITLRY' TY POSFS.TIE MO TIE LOTS DAINAGE AND PATER EASEMDIS AS SHORN IETESN. DATED CITY OF RAH JACINTO MAYOIe ATTEST BY DIET CLETEE PLANNING COMMISSION STATEMENT THIS MAP. TRACT NO. 22347. IS RE DRIB/HAL. TENTATIVE MAP OF CITY OFTSSHIM T JCINTO3PLANNINB CCRISSIIE NMIN WACCS ODAMOO WITH TIDE LAW IN A DULY AUTRWI2ED NEETIND HELD MAY B. 10B7. CITY OF SAN JACINTO. CALIFOMIA AR?. EI IY O SAN JACINTO PLAHMNG CDAIISSTSN DATED THIS DAY OF ID . NOTICE OF ELECTION BY LAND DIVIDER TO DEFER PAYMENT OF DRAINAGE FEES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE SAN JACINTO FESIONAL AREA IMAMATE PLAN WHICH WAS AOWTED BY THE DOME OF SOFERVISOs C THE GOUTY OF RIVERSIDE PARII AN,' TO SECTION 10.25 of ODINANCE ASO ME BCTON B643B. ET. NO. OF THE EMERGENT COOL AND SATO PROPERTY IS DISSECT TO FEES FOR SAID DRAINAGE AREA. NOTICE IS FURTHER 9YYFN THAT. PIADUANT TO SECTION 10.25 OF ODINANCE 460. THE LAND DIVIDER HAS ELECTED TO DEFER PAYMENT OF THE DRAINAGE FEE TO TIE TIME OF I"JBUANCE OF A GRADING OM BUILDING PERMIT FOR SAID PARCELS AND THAT DE OWNER OF EACH PARCEL, AT TIE OFBIIILO PEIT,, RULE BE REQUIREDTIME TO PPAAYISSUANCE IE TFEE IEO IIEDR AT TI'SA OP IM RATE IN EFFECT AT THE TIME O ISSUANCE O THE ACTUAL PERMIT. .9 b. ®la. PITY gar! Fxt OM IC. 1OM I) SIT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF SAN JACINTO STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and City Council Members 3 -)7 Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager March 11, 1992 SEWER AGREEMENT RELEASE - DE CORMIER RECOMMENDATION Approve the "Release of Recorded Instrument" for Agreement (Re: Sewer Installation) and authorize Mayor to execute. On December 16, 1988, the City approved an agreement with Raymond and Jeanette DeCormier for the financing of the sewer recapture fees for 818 S. Santa Fe. The DeCormier's have requested release of the Agreement as they have fulfilled their obligation. The Finance Department has confirmed this. Respectfully submitted, Brian K. McNabb Director of Community Development Excepting therefrom the Westerly 60 feet thereof. 1 2 more commonly known as 818 S. Santa Fe Avenue, San Jacinto, California. Assessor's Parcel Number 3 435-250-014-4. 4 It is understood and agreed by the property owner that this agreement shall be recorded with the County of Riverside 5 and shall be binding upon the heirs, transferees, successors, and assigns of the property owner. Time is 6 declared to be the essence of this agreement and this contract shall be deemed to have been executed and to be 7 performed in the County of Riverside, State of California. 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the to s hereto have ecuted this Agreement as of the da and year f rrjiCbove. 9 10 11 12 14 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ATTEST: t 2 « Deputy City Clerk, City of San Jacinto ER CI OF SAN JAFINTO Trammell ea STATE OF CALIFORNIA isa. COUNTY OF **Riverside*" On January 17, 1989 before me, the undersigned. a Notary Public In and for said State. oereonelly appeared **Raymond Decor:0ier** **Jeanette Decormier** 4449 6.44 1.61 6/Cb:rnu=' (or proved to me on the basis of Sotie- factory evidence) to be the oersonfsi whose names) is/are sub- scribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/She/they executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. SIgnature OFFICIAL SEAL +.HERNANDEZ NOTARY PUBLIC CALIFORNIA PRINCIPAL OffiCE IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY Idy Canmissmn Eapiree lutp 4( 1989 +-..r♦vvv.vvvNrA ..A ......... (This area for official octane) seal) 8 U 10 D }2 13 14 15 10 17 is ]0 20 2 99 23 14 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 / eocoao%No REQUESTED BY czrY cLoao WHEN aocoeoEn, HazL TO ,�CITr CLERK, CITY OF sA0 z8czmTo 8 , ca. 92383 � r � Z: 4 AGREEMENT (RE: SEVER INSTALLATION) Thb�aqzeament, made and entered into tni5 .// day of ' ^ and between the CITY OF SAN `~^^~^` hereinafter referred to as "The City" and Raymond ' and Jeanette oecozmier, husband and wife as joint tenants, hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners". Regarding the foctbset terms and conditions in that they are in reference to the subject property 80 S. Santa Fe Avenue, San Jacinto, California, hereinafter referred to as "the said property". woEuE&a the septic system has failed at said property. WHEREAS the city requires the connection to the sewer system if sewer is available. WHEREAS the property owners are unable to pay in full the sewer cost. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed, by and between the parties hereto as follows; l. That the property neuez agrees to connect to the sewer immediately. 2. That in exchange, the property owner shall execute and deliver to the city a Note in the amount of one thousand seven hundred ninety eight dollars and twenty five cents ($1,798.25). Said mu+e shall have an interest rate of seven percent (7%) amortized over thirty six (36) months. Said note shall be payable at a rate of Fifty five dollars and fifty eight cents ($55.58)' Per mouth on the twentieth (20tb) day of each month commencing January mnn , until paid in full. 3, That said Note is to reflect the amount of consideration estimated to be reasonable and necessary for the above -mentioned sewer improvements. 4. That in the event that said property owners tail or refuse to make said payments, the City obaD have the option of bringing such legal action as the law may afford to enforce the collection of said costs of said public improvements, together with reasonable attoroey'n fees and costs/ or may cause said costs of said public improvements to be made a lien against the real property as herein described. 5. That the real property referred to herein is all that real property located in the City of Sao Jacinto, County of Riverside, State of California, and more particularly described as; Lots 19, zo, and 21 in Town Block 36 of Estudilzo Laud and Water Company's addition to San Jacinto, as shown by Map on tile in Rook 9 page 410 of Maps, San Diego County Records. AnPPRWVMTq RA PFS%WRITE\SANTA-FE.8118 PAGE NO. 1 RECORDING REQUESIED BY CITY OF SAN JACINTO 1EN RECORDED MAIL TO CITY OF SAN JACINTO P. O, BOX 488 SAN JACINTO, CA. 92583 RELEASE OF RECORDED INSTRUMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: THAT THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, County of Riverside, State of California, does hereby certify and declare that a certain AGREEMENT (Re: Sewer Installation) bearing date the l6th day of December, 1988 made and executed by RAYMOND AND JEANEI'lE DE CORMIER of the City of San Jacinto. County of Riverside, State of California. the party of the second part therein to AGREEMENT was recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, State of California. in 1989 as Instrument Number 19272 on the 20th day of January, 1989, together with the debt thereby secured, is fully paid. satisfied and discharged. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of , 1992. Signed, Sealed and Delivered in the Presence of Francis Boykin, Mayor City of San Jacinto .ATTEST' Deputy City Clerk STA l L OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared , known to me to he the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledge that he executed the same. WITNESS my official hand and office seal Notary Public in and for said State. d DeCormier INSTALLMENT NOTE 4 $1,79B.25 5 6 7 In installments and at the times hereinafter stated, for value 8 received Raymond and Jeanette DeCormier promises to pay to the 9 City of San Jacinto, or their order, at 201 East Main Street' 10 P.O. Box 4BB San Jacinto, Riverside County, California, the 11 principal sum of Seventeen Hundred Ninety'eight Dollars and 12 Twenty-five Cents ($1798°25), until said principal sum is paid, 13 with interest at the rate of Seven Per Cent (7%) amortized over 14 Thirty-six (36) months. Principal and interest due in monthly 15 installments of Fifty-five Dollars and Fifty-eight Cents, or 16 more, on the Twentieth (20th) day of each month and every month, 17 beginning on the Twentieth (20th) day of January, 19B9 and 18 continuing until said principal sum and the interest thereon has 19 been fully paid. This Note is executed in consideration of that 20 certain Sewer Installment Agreement executed on January 3, 19B9" 21 between Raymond and Jeanette DeCornmier, Property Owner, and the 22 City of San Jacinto, and recorded with the County Recorder, 23 Riverside County, AT ANY TIME, THE PRIVILEGE IS RESERVED TO PAY 24 MORE THAN THE SUM DUE. Should Default be made in the payment of 25 any of said installments when due, then the whole sum of 26 principal and interest shall become immediately due and payable � at the option of the holder of this Note. Should suit commence 'B to collect this Note or any portion thereof' such sum as the 29 Court may deem reasonable shall beadded hereto as attorneys fees 30 and costs. Principal and interest_-p-ayable in lawful money of the / 31 United States of America. / 32 �_j - 34 DATE: 35 36 37 38 DATE: 39 \J^—n�ette/~n/eCormier T \- '-/ - | � STATE oFCALIFORNIA Riverside |su COUNTY OF / � On January 4, 1989 before me, the undersigned, aNotary Public mand for � said State, pemnna/iyappeared RAYM80D oeC08aIER and JEA0ETTE DeCORMIED - � � y6� (or proved mme onmebasmWsells- factory evidence) tovrthe nenon(s)whose name(s)is/are sub- sp/urummew.mm.ommwentuouaoknwm/eusputnmemat he*h*/heyexecuted the same. WITNESS my hand,�nd official seal. e � 7 m - ` ...�.~'~'.....°.~~...°° � -_.~..... c ^����n� ��Fm.,��.���� � " FiHERMANDE� � � womRnrueu cc/mRn.^ h RIVERSIDE COUNTY ) twnmtssm Expreiii July 4, 88 ! �~�'Wl...~~.--.~~~.. Z�Z (This area for official notarial seal) STAFF REPORT AGENDA S 113 3 - 17 To: Honorable Mayor & Council Members via City Manager From: Chief of Poe/Anna Vega y Date: March 11, 1992 Subject: Request from Park Hill Elementary School to Discharge Firearms RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Ramona Pageant Cowboys to Discharge Weapons During their Demonstration On March 11, 1992 my office received correspondence from Park Hill Elementary School Principal Mike Salinas requesting authorization to put on a demonstration using the Ramona Pageant Cowboys. During the demonstration the letter indicates that the discharge of weapons, using blank rounds, is also a part of the demonstration. In accordance with Title 9, Chapter 9.16, Section 9.16.020, the discharge of any firearm is prohibited within the city limits. The Council may authorize a waiver of the prohibition for a specific event should good cause exist. The event is billed as a "Hoe Down" which appears to be in keeping with the tradition of the Ramona Pageant, a valley -wide event. In this regard it is recommended that authorization be granted for the discharge of the firearms with the condition that adequate safety precautions are taken. In addition, the Office of Risk Management requires proof of liability insurance coverage in the amount of $1,000,000 for this event. Should you have any questions, I am available to address your concerns. a 271c Iii Z_Z EJ Fri I2 tt Z1 r-y ch C:, Gr7P 1 1157 E. Commonwealth San Jacinto, CA 92583 (714) 654-6651 Mike Salinas Principal March 11, 1992 San Jacinto Police Department Attn: Chief Joe Kozma 160 W. 6th San Jacinto, CA 92583 Dear Chief Kozma: On March 20, 1992, Park Hill Elementary will be having it's first annual Hoe Down which will be attended by school and community members. This program will begin at 7:00 p.m. and will end at 9:00 p.m. The Ramona Pageant Cowboys will be participating in this event and would like to demonstrate cowboy skills for the children in attendance. For authenticity, the demonstration would include the discharging of blank firearms. Therefore, we would like your permission for their participation in the community event. Your consideration would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Mike\Salinas Principal MS:pjc c: Sandra Shackelford City of San Jacinto STAFF REPORT EN h TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council 3 - I 7- FROM: Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief/Building Official Via City Manager Pamela S. Easter DATE: March 17, 1992 SUBJECT: 1992 ANNUAL WEED ABATEMENT RESOLUTION Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the 1992 annual weed abatement resolution which declares all rubbish and refuse upon specified streets and private property within the City of San Jacinto to be public nuisances and all weeds growing upon specified streets and private property within the City to be seasonal and recurrent public nuisances and further declares the City's intention to remove and abate the same under and in accordance with the provisions of Title 4, Division 3, Part 2, Chapter 13, Article 2, of the Government Code. Background: Each year the City Council must pass a resolution which declares all rubbish and refuse upon specified streets and private property within the City to be public nuisances and all weeds growing on those specified streets and private property to be seasonal and recurrent public nuisances. This resolution essentially initiates the annual Weed Abatement Program. On the day after adoption, March 18th, 1992, a letter announcing the annual Weed Abatement Program and a "Notice to Destroy Weeds and Remove Rubbish, Refuse and Dirt" is sent to each of the specified property owners in "Exhibit A" to the resolution. Copies are attached to this report. The next step will be a public hearing on April 7th, 1992 to hear any protests from these property owners. Council will then be requested to adopt a resolution which overrules objections and declares the City's intention to proceed with abatement. City of San Jacinto Fire Department 201 East Main San Jacinto, California 92583 714/487--3370 March 18, 1992 Dear Property Owner: The City of San Jacinto is ready to begin its annual Weed Abatement Program. All owners of vacant property within the City of San Jacinto will be receiving a Weed Abatement notice. According to the Riverside County Assessor's records you are listed as the owner of the property listed on the address label and on the reverse side "Notice to Abate." We would ask you to please check the parcel description(s) listed on the address label and on the reverse side of this notice for accuracy. If you have already cleared your property of weeds, rubbish and refuse, we will check your property off as being cleared by owner. Most owners clear their property throughout the year as required and we acknowledge and appreciate those owners who abide by the City's rules and regulations in keeping San Jacinto a clean and fire -safe community. We are again asking that all properties be cleared of excessive weed growth and rubbish and and refuse also be removed. In order to be certain that the City contractor will not clear your property, please have all work completed by May 15, 1992. If your property is cleared by that date. and maintained throughout the coming year, you will be in compliance with the City of San Jacinto Weed Abatement Resolution. If your property is not in compliance, the cost of abatement and an administrative fee shall be levied and assessed against your property and billed directly to you. If that charge is not paid promptly, the charge shall be considered as a special assessment lien against your property. Should you have any questions regarding our Weed Abatement Program, we will be happy to assist you in any way we can. Please direct your inquiries to the San Jacinto Fire Department, 201 East Main Street, San Jacinto, CA. 92583 or call the Fire Department at 714/487-7330. Sincerely ROSS CHADWICK Fire Chief City of San Jacinto NOTICE TO DESTROY WEEDS AND REMOVE RUBBISH, REFUSE AND DIRT Notice is hereby given that on the 17th day of March, 1992 the City Council of the City of San Jacinto passed a resolution declaring that noxious or dangerous weeds were growing upon or in front of the property on this street, or as described above, in San Jacinto; and more particularly described in the resolution and that they constitute a public nuisance which must be abated by the removal of the weeds, rubbish, refuse and dirt. Otherwise, they will be removed and the nuisance abated by the City, and the cost of removal assessed upon the land from or in front of which the weeds, rubbish, refuse and dirt are removed and will constitute a lien upon such land until paid. Reference is hereby made to the resolution for further particulars. A copy of said resolution is on file in the office of the City Clerk. All property owners having any objections to the proposed removal of the weeds, rubbish, refuse and dirt are hereby notified to attend a meeting of the City Council of San Jacinto to be held April 7, 1992, when their objections will be heard and given due consideration. Dated this 18th day of March, 1992 Deputy City Clerk City of San Jacinto March 77, 1992 '992 Weed Abatement Resolution RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ALL RUBBISH AND REFUSE UPON SPECIFIED STREETS AND PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHIN SAID CITY TO BE PUBLIC NUISANCES AND ALL WEEDS GROWING UPON SPECIFIED STREETS AND PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHIN SAID CITY TO BE SEASONAL AND RECURRENT PUBLIC NUISANCES AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO REMOVE AND ABATE THE SAME UNDER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 4, DIVISION 3, PART 2, CHAPTER 13, ARTICLE 2, OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ASSEMBLED IN REGULAR SESSION THIS 17th DAY OF MARCH, 1992 DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. It is hereby found, determined and declared that rubbish and refuse existing upon the hereinafter described parkways, streets and private property within the City of San Jacinto, and weeds which bear seeds of wingy and/or downy nature and/or attain such a large growth as to become a fire menace when dry, and/or which are otherwise noxious and/or dangerous, are growing upon the streets, sidewalks and private property in the City of San Jacinto, California, described in Exhibit "A" hereinafter referred to. 2. It is hereby found, determined and declared that weeds which bear seeds of wingy and/or downy nature and/or attain such a large growth as to become a fire menace when dry, and/or which are otherwise noxious and/or dangerous, are seasonal and recurrent nuisances and are growing upon l' ;- streets, sidewalks and private property in the City of San Jacinto, California, described in Exhihi, hereinafter referred to. 3. That pursuant to the provisions of Article 2, Chapter 13, Part 2, Division 3, Title 4, of the California Government Code, such rubbish and refuse existing at and such weeds growing in or upon streets, sidewalks, parkways or in private property at the locations set forth and more particularly described in that certain list hereunto attached, marked Exhibit "A," and by this reference incorporated in and made a part hereof, are determined and declared to be public nuisances which must be abated by the removal thereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council will at the time of its regular meeting on April 7, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 625 South Pico of said City, to hear and consider all objections to the proposed removal of weeds, rubbish and refuse. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and cause it to be published pursuant to law. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of March 1992 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Page 1 March 17, 1992 199L Need Abatement Resolution ATTEST: City Clerk CERTIFICATE Mayor The foregoing is certified to he a true copy of Resolution No. duly adopted by the said City Council of the city of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein. City Clerk Page 2 AUENDA5 15 STAFF REPORT 3-17 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance Director via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager SUBJ: Janitorial Services Contract DATE: March 17, 1992 RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Mayor to enter into a contract with "In His Service" for janitorial services at 201 E. Main, 312 E. Main, Police Department, Community Center and Corporation Yard. BACKGROUND Louis Arroyo, of Hemet is the janitorial service company currently being used by the City for all office buildings. Mr. Arroyo has requested an increase in the monthly fees to $2,395.00. This request is due to the completion of the remodel and additional space. Therefore, staff solicited bids for janitorial services. Bids were received from In His Service for $1,210.00; Service Master, $1,899.00; Valley Resource, $2,605.00 and Interior Images, $2,995.00. Interviews and reference calls were made on the two lowest bidders. Both companies were given good recommendations, they have the proper insurance and stand behind their work and workers. Temecula based, In His Service will maintain all city buildings including once a week cleaning of the corporation yard. (A copy of the work schedules is attached for your review.) The agreement with In His Service has a service terminating clause which requires a 30 days notice. In His Service will be using their own equipment, thus saving the City funds in replacement cost of vacuum cleaners, etc. The City however, will continue being responsible for the purchase of paper goods and cleaning supplies. Semi-annual steam cleaning is being recommended by the janitorial companies. This will help extend the life of the new carpets in all the buildings. The cost for this service will be $660.00 per cleaning by In His Service or 12 cents per square foot. The second bidder, Service Master was $978. SUMMARY OF OBLIGATION Five limes Weekly - General Areas I. Empty all waste baskets and trash receptacles; replace liners as needed and remove all waste to the pick-up area. Dust all counters, ledges, window sills, picture frames and all flat surfaces. Dust and/or damp wipe clean all desk tops, chairs, and office furniture (papers, folders and other material left on desk and other furniture will not be moved). Vacuum all carpet; spot clean as needed. 5. Remove fingerprints, spots, etc. from partition glass, light swithces, woodwork, doors and door frames. 6. Empty all ash trays and smoking stands (if applicable). :lop/wet wax tile areas. Five Times Weekly - Restrooms Mop all restroom floors with disinfectant cleaner. Base- boards will be wiped after mopping floors. 2. Toilet bowls and urinals shall be cleaned inside and out, removing staines, then sanitized. Clean all wash basins. Clean and polish all plumbing, faucets, valves and metal work. �. Clean and polish all mirrors. 6. Clean par i.tit i.ons on all surfaces. Clean wall surfaces as required. 8. Refill all dispensers. 9. Waste paper containers emptied, liners replaced, cleaned and disinfected as needed. TERMS AND CONDITIONS Customer Name: City of San Jacinto Address: 312 E. Main, San Jacinto, CA Contact: Anne Halberg Services will be performed outside of normal business hours, unless otherwise specified in writing. In the event that this contract proves to be unsatisfactory, it may be terminated by a 30 day written notice by either party. Payment for services is due and payable within ten days of receipt of invoice. Invoices are issued at the end of each month. Paper and cleaning supplies will be provided by the City of San Jacinto. This contract is regarding five buildings located at 312 E. Main, 201 E. Main, 160 W. Sixth Street, 625 S. Pico and 960 Industrial Way, San Jacinto, CA. SUMMARY OF OBLIGATION Service: 5 times weekly (see attached schedule of tasks) 960 Industrial Way - one time a week Windows cleaned (inside and out) monthly Carpet steam cleaned semi-annually Fee: $1,210.00 per month plus $ 660.00 per semi-annual carpet cleaning ($.12 per foot @ 5,500 sq.ft.) This contract begins on the day of , 1992. IN HIS SERVICE ENTERPRISES CITY OF SAN JACINTO Richard R. Themm Pamela S. Easter Owner City Manager Signature Signature Date Date es ern oM...„1.. 0 ODD urcty Coany JANITORIAL SERVICE BOND JUL 1 1991 Bond No. 58455151 In consideration of an agreed premium, the Western Surety Company, a South Dakota corporation, Richard R. Theirm, Pamela K. Therm, & Kevin M. Therm DBA hereby agrees to indemnify in Hiq Cp-riro Fnterpriga� of `I'r=mcricla against loss of money or other property, real (hereinafter called "Subscriber") to its services, or for which the Subscriber is legally liable, which fraudulent or dishonest act, as hereinafter defined, alone or in collusion with others, and for which the C'al i fnrni a (hereinafter called "Obligee"), or personal, belonging to any and all subscribers in which the Subscriber has a pecuniary interest, or the Subscriber shall sustain as the result of any of an Employee or Employees of the Obligee acting Obligee is liable, the amount of indemnity on each of such Employees being TwFnt y-five thni i and and nn f 1 M Dollars ($ 25 000 a THE FOREGOING AGREEMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND LIMITATIONS: TERM OF BOND: SECTION 1. The term of this bond begins with the 75th day of June 199.E at 12:00 o'clock night, standard time, at the address of the Obligee above given, and ends at 12:00 o'clock night, standard time, on the effective date of the cancellation of this bond in its entirety. DISCOVERY PERIOD: SECTION 2. Loss is covered under this bond only (a) if sustained through any act or acts committed by any Employee of Obligee while this bond is in force as to such Employee, and (h) if discovered prior to the expirati'7r or sooner cancellation of this bond in its entirety as provided in Section 11, or from its cancellation or terminat.c' in its entirety in any other manner, whichever shall first happen. DEFINITION OF EMPLOYEE: SECTION 3. The word Employee or Employees, as used in this bond, shall be deemed to mean, respectively, one or more of the natural persons (except directors or trustees of the Obligee, if a corporation, who are not also of- ficers or employees thereof in some other capacity) while in the regular service of the Obligee in the ordinary course of the Obligee's business during the term of this bond, and whom the Ohligee compensates by salary, or wages and has the right to govern anti direct in the performance of such service, and who are engaged in such service within any of the States of the United States of America, or within the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin. Islands, or elsewhere for a limited period, but not to mean brokers, factors, commission merchants, consignees, contractors, or other agents or representatives of the same character. FRAUDULENT OR DISHONEST ACT: SECTION 4. A fraudulent or dishonest act of an Employee of the Obligee shall mean an act which is punishable under the Criminal Code in the jurisdiction within which act occurred, �or which said Employee is tried and con- victed by a court of proper .jurisdiction. MERGER OR CONSOLIDATION: SECTION 5. If any natural persons shall be taken into the regular service of the Obligee through merger or con- solidation with some other concern, the Obligee shall give the Surety written notice thereof and shall pay an addi- tional premium on any increase in the number of Employees covered under this bond as a result, of such merger or consolidation computed pro rata from the date of such merger or consolidation to the end of the current )remium period. NON -ACCUMULATION OF LIABILITY: SECTION 6. Regardless of the number of years this bond shall continue in force and the number of premiums which shall be payable or paid, the liability of the Surety under this bond shall not, he cumulative in amounts from year to year or from period to period. LIMIT OF LIABILITY UNDER THIS BOND AND PRIOR INSURANCE: SECTION 7. With respect to loss or losses caused by an Employee or which are chargeable to siieh Employee as provided in Section 5 and which occur partly under this bond and partly under other bonds or policies issued by the Surety to the Obligee or to any predecessor in interest of the Obligee and terminated or cancelled or allowed to expire and in which the period ror discovery has not expired at the tirne any such loss or losses thereunder are discovered, the total liability of the Surety under this bond and under such other bonds or policies shall not ex ceed, in the aggregate, the amount carried under this bond on such loss or losses or the amount available to the Obligee under such other bonds or policies, as limited by the terms and conditions thereof, for any such loss or losses, if the latter amount he the larger. Form 1375 — 7-87 ew EWE Addendum to Contract Contractor, Richard R. Themm, Pamela K. Themm & Kevin M. Themm DEA IN HIS SERVICE ENTERPRISES, does hereby warrant and acknow- ledge that it is an independent contractor, and as such, maintains such coverage as is mandated by the State of California for any and all work related injuries to itself and its employees. Contractor agrees that it shall save, defend and hold. the City of San Jacinto free and harmless from any claim, action, damage or award that may arise from the providing of services by Contrac- tor to the City of San Jacinto. In furtherance of this paragraph, Contractor shall maintain general liability insurance in such amounts as may be required by City, but in no event shall coverage be less than $ City shall be named as an additional insured under said policy. Nothing stated in this agreement shall be construed to create any employee/employer relationship between Contractor and City, or between City and any employee of Contractor. Compensation shall be paid as stated in the contract without deduction for employment related taxes or other standard deductions, which shall be the responsibility of Contractor. Dated: IN HIS SERVICE BY DATE: March 16, 1992 TO: COX, COX & CAMPER A Professional Corporation Attorneys at Law 805 East Florida Avenue Hemet, California 92343 (714) 652-1400 FAX W: (714) 652-3990 Anna Vega FAX TRANSMITTAL FAX NO: 654-3728 FROM: Jim Cox SUBJECT MATTER: Agenda Item 5.15, Janitorial Services Anna, We might want to consider language as enclosed to be added to the janitorial contract. Particularly if the contractor has employees. I doubt that this service, or few like it, maintain general liability insurance. They may decline to provide such coverage and we will then have to consider waiving it. If they employees, we need to at least confirm workers comp. Thanks. TRANSMITTING 2 PAGES, INCLUDING COVER SHEET NOTE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FAX MESSAGE MAY CONTAIN ATTORNEY -CLIENT PRIVII.FGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMED ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPCNSIBLE TO DELIVER IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLFASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO US AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA THE U.S. POSTAL, SERVICE. THANK YOU. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLFASE TELEPHONE (714) 652-1400 AND ASK FOR PAT. Ve 5 Ice STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor Mayor and City Council FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance Director via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager SUBJ: Furniture Purchase for 201 E. Main DATE: March 17, 1992 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the purchase of furniture/office equipment for 201 E. Main (Development services staff) in the amount of $ 9,200.00. The purchase shall be made from Systems Source Inc. and funded through account 14-4600-5400 (Sewer), 18-2350-5400 (Workers Comp), 25-8250-5400 (LLMD), 40-2500- 5400 (Capital Improvement), 50-9000-5400 (Water), and 65-8650-5400 (Fire Mitigation). No monies from the general fund will be used for this purchase. BACKGROUND In November 1991, the Council authorized the purchase of furniture for 312 E. Main offices as well as a conference table and secretarial chairs for 201 E. Main, Development Services. The furniture now being presented for purchase will complete a large majority of the furniture needs for both City offices on Main. Additional purchases will be included in the proposed 1992-93 budget. The furniture being purchased through System Sources is the same type, style, and color of the furniture that was approved in November 1991. Our goal is to buy office systems furniture that is uniform and can be used when we move to the City Hall of the 90,s. The following is included in the proposed purchase: 4 desk chairs; 7 bookcases; 4 lateral files; 6 side chairs and work station panels. The furniture is for staff in Planning, Building, and Fire Administration departments. Fire Captain Bob Wilson is available to answer questions regarding the details of the purchase. STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance Director via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager SUBJ: Receivables Recovery Program DATE: March 17, 1992 RECOMMENDATION ACiEND 777 3 - Authorize the Mayor to enter into a contract for one year with Transworld Systems, Inc. for the purpose of recovering water, trash and sewer uncollectible accounts. BACKGROUND The City is experiencing a number of delinquencies for sewer, water and trash. In January, there were 419 accounts with past due amounts; 409 in December and 406 in November. These delinquencies represent about 10% of our customers. Other methods of collection are being utilized for business license, weed abatement and police claim delinquencies. Transworld however, can assist the City's collection in these areas. In the past, staff filed a small claim action against customers for water non -payments. It is difficult for current staff to track down the debtor due to the increased number of customers, non - payments and staff time constraints. Collections can no longer be handled in-house. All three major concerns of the City (Collection agency, legal, and credit actions) will be handled through Transworld's program. Transworld will assist the City in recovering the maximum amount of money for the minimum cost. Transworld's program is projected to have a minimum recovery of 30%. The program will generate an overall increase in revenues over our normal billing receipts. Transworld does not charge on a percentage per collection basis. They charge by the number of accounts turned over for collection. A low flat fee is the same regardless of the type of delinquency, the amount or the location of the debtor. Transworld Systems Inc. has proposed that the City start with 200 accounts for an initial cost of $1,590. Transworld guarantees recovery of $3,180, a 50% net gain after the initial cost. The City however, will be able to pass on the "flat fee" service charged from Transworld to the debtor, therefore the collection service will pay for itself. Page 2 Receivables Recovery Program Transworld Systems, Inc provides services to other municipalities. Staff contacted the City of Palm Springs, Loma Linda and Fullerton. The Cities stated that the recoveries percent have actually been higher than their quoted percent and no complaints have been received regarding the procedures used by Transworld on their collections. An automatic notification to the City of accounts requiring "hard- core" techniques will be made prior to any action being taken. The City will then be able to decide on a case by case basis, the level of effort to apply to difficult collection cases. Real Estat Appraisers and Consultants PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lots 1, 2, 3, 6, 8 & 9 APN's 433-160-024, 027, 028, 029, 032, 033, 034, 035 & 039 SWC Main Street & Ramona Expressway, San Jacinto, CA (Pending Foreclosure - Portion of Assessment District No. 87-1) PREPARED FOR: The City of San Jacinto CIO James A. Cox, Attorney at Law Cox, Cox & Camper 805 East Florida Avenue Hemet, CA 92543 DATE OF PREPARATION: March 5, 1992 PREPARED BY: D. Brian Shumway, CA-S, CRA Principal Consultant NAME: ASMNTDST.SJC 133 N. BUENA VISTA ST., SUITE 4 • HEMET, CA 92343 • (714)929-2345 • FAX (714) 658-9593 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE 1.0 TITLE PAGE 2.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.0 CONTRACTUAL INFORMATION 3.1 Client & Subject Property Data 3.2 Purpose of the Engagement 3.3 Approach, Scope and Content 3.4 Specific Service/Report Criteria 3.5 Completion Schedule & Delivery Date 3.6 Professional Service Fee 3.7 Conformity of Report 3.8 Disclosure of Findings & Conclusions 3.9 Contingent & Limiting Conditions 3.10 Consultant Liability 3.11 Completion of Assignment 3.12 Supplemental Services 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 3.13 Delinquent Payments & Collection Costs 5 3.14 Cancellation of Services 5 3.15 Responsible Contracting Party 5 3.16 Provisions & Legal Jurisdiction 6 3.17 Conformance & Acceptance of Report 6 3.18 Property Status 6 3.19 Client/Third Party Supplied Data 6 3.20 Consent, Acceptance & Signatures 7 4.0 CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 4.1 General Disclosure Statement 8 4.2 Limit of Liability 4.3 Possession Rights & Limitations 8 4.4 Authenticity of Report 8 4.5 Use of the Report 8 4.6 Trade Secrets 8 4.7 Confidentiality 8 4.8 Reliability of Reported Information 8 4.9 Alterations & Revisions 8 4.10 Valuation Conveyance 8 4.11 Date of Value & Purchasing Power 9 4.12 Component Values 9 4.13 Exhibits 9 4.14 Marketable Title 9 4.15 Auxiliary & Related Studies 9 4.16 Property Management 9 4.17 Hazardous Materials & Legal Issues 9 4.18 Market Value 9 4.19 Mineral Rights 9 4.20 Furnishings & Equipment 10 4.21 Profeasional Service Fees 10 4.22 Deficiency Costs 10 4.23 Market Dynamics & Alteration of Report 10 4.24 After Tax Analysis and/or Valuation 10 4.25 Acceptance and Use of the Report 10 5.0 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS OF THE CONSULTANT 5.1 Education & Background 11 5.2 Professional Affiliations, Membership & Designations 11 5.3 Professional Background & Activity 12 5.4 Expert Witness Testimony 12 5.5 Geographical Service Area 12 5.6 Real Property Report Uses 13 5.7 Types of Real Property Appraised 13 5.8 Partial List of Selected Clientele 14 6.0 SUBJECT PROPERTY PLAT & TAX ROLL 6.1 Assessor Parcel Map & Tax Roll 18 WEST Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants 2 AUTHORIZATION AND CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3.1 CLIENT & SUBJECT PROPERTY DATA: CLIENT NAME: The City of San Jacinto (C/O James A. Cox. Attorney at Law - Cox. Cox & Camper) MAILING ADDRESS: 805 East Florida Avenue CITY: Hemet STATE: California ZIP CODE: 92543 COUNTRY: U.S.A. RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL: James A. Cox. Attorney at Law WORK: 714.652.1400 FAX: 714.652.3990 HOME: 000.000.0000 CELLULAR: 000.000.0000 SUBJECT PROPERTY: Lots 1. 2. 3. 6, 8. & 9 (Commercial Land Parcels - Improved WIOff-sites) STREET LOCATION: SWC Main Street & Ramona Expressway (Donna Way) THOMAS MAP: 45-F/5 COMMUNITY: City of San Jacinto COUNTY: Riverside STATE: California ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS: 433-160-024. 027. 028, 029. 032, 033, 034. 035 & 039 VESTED OWNER(S) OF RECORD: Per RIVCO Record Data (Title Report to Follow by Client) 3.2 PURPOSE OF THE ENGAGEMENT: Pursuant to your request and formal authorization, TIERRA WEST, Real Estate Appraisers and Consultants, hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant", will undertake an assignment to prepare one (1) of the following: a California State Certified Appraisal: As Per California Civil Code Sec. 1922 1 Certified Narrative Appraisal: 0 Non -Certified Appraisal or Limited Scope Valuation: 0 Market Study, Research or Analysis: 3.3 DATE OF VALUE. REPORT PURPOSE, USE & CONTENT: PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED: Fee Simple Estate DATE OF VALUE: 30-JAN-92 PURPOSE & USE OF THE REPORT: Estimate Fair Market Value - Pending Foreclosure CONDITION(S) OF VALUE: Value Estimate Based Upon "As Is" Condition of Subject Property REPORTS TO DELIVER: Four (4) Original Appraisal Reports Certified Narrative Appraisal Reports and California Stale Certified Appraisal Reports shall contain the following base information and be prepared in conformance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice as set forth under Title XI of the Federal Institution Recovery and Reform Enforcement Act of 1986: (A) Title Page; (B) Letter of Transmittal; (C) Table of Contents; (D) Summary of Salient Data; (E) Contingent and Limiting Conditions; (F) Objective, Purpose and Use of the Report; (G) Definition of Market Value; (H) Photographs of Subject Property and Comparable Market Data; (I) Identification and Description of the Subject Property; (I) Location Analysis and Area Profile; (K) Statement of Highest and Best Use; (L) Appraisal Methodology; (M) Three Approaches to Value (WHERE APPLICABLE) Including the Cost Approach, Direct Sales Comparison Approach and Income Approach; (N) Reconciliation and Final Value Estimate; (0) Certification of the Appraiser; (P) Qualifications of the Appraiser; (Q) Subject and Market Data Location Maps; (R) Plat Map of Subject Property; (S) Zoning and Development Standards; (T) Legal Description and Taxes; (U) Improvement Layout; and (V) Miscellaneous Addenda. TIERRA WEST Real Estate Appraisers Sc Consultants 3 ORIZATION CON CT " PROFESSIONAL SERVE 3.4 SPECIFIC SERVICE/REPORT CRITERIA: The Consultant shall prepare a comprehensive narrative real estate appraisal report which shall set forth an estimate of Fair Market Value for the subject property utilizing customary appraisal valuation procedures and methodology consistent with the type of real property being appraised and availability of data. Since valuation of the subject properties entails multiple parcels, a discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis shall be employed within the appraisal report in order to set forth a reasonable present value estimate for the subject properties. Such methodology reflects discounting associated with disposition of multiple parcels over time and is customarily employed in the valuation of properties such as the subject. It is acknowledged that the subject properties are located within an assessment district (AD #87-1). 3.5 COMPLl I'ION SCHEDULE & DELIVERY DATE: Except for unavoidable circumstances and unforeseen delays, it is estimated that completion of the report will be within approximately 30 days from the date the following have been received by the Consultant: o A fully executed and signed copy of this authorization agreement; • The professional service fee or retainer/deposit as noted below; and o All requested Client supplied or third party information necessary to complete the assignment. Delays in providing the above will result in an extended report delivery date. This contract shall be null and void if not received by the Consultant within 7 calendar days. 3.6 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE FEE: The estimated professional fee for completion of the report/service as set forth in this agreement shall not exceed $6.000 without the prior written consent of the Client. Billing for professional services rendered shall be invoiced at $75/HR for Associate Appraisers within the firm and $125/HR for the Principal Appraiser. Said fee is subject to amendment upon change in Client's request or scope of services rendered. The Client shall be notified in writing of such change(s) before further work proceeds. A retainer/deposit of ' grki3' ::.; Kfig' , ) shall be due and payable upon execution of this agreement with the balance of total fees due and payable upon notification and delivery of the completed report(s). Supplemental services beyond the scope of this contract, including but not limited to expert witness testimony, court preparation, depositions, consultations and other appearances, will be invoiced on a separate basis. 3.7 CONFORMITY OF REPORT: The report, analysis or study shall conform with and be subject to the requirements as set forth in the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute. 3.8 DISCLOSURE OF FINDINGS & CONCLUSIONS: Information relevant to the findings and conclusions of this report will be disclosed only to the Client or assignees unless otherwise authorized. Disclosure of the assignment to others may occur during the investigative process. 3.9 CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS: The Consultant's service shall be subject to the "Contingent and Limiting Conditions" as attached herewith and as appear in the report. The Client acknowledges that they have read, comprehend and agree to such Contingent and Limiting Conditions. I TIERRA WEST Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants 4 AUTHORIZATION AND COI‘ITIZACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3.10 CONSULTANT LIABILITY: The Consultant's total liability to Client and/or third parties is limited to the amount of fee collected as liquidated damages. No responsibility is assumed for matters which are legal in nature or which require specialized investigation or knowledge beyond that which is customarily employed by real estate appraisers. Consultant's liability is limited to Client only; there is no implied or otherwise stated accountability to any third party. Unauthorized use of this report by Client or third parties voids any and all Consultant liability. 3.11 COMPLETION OF ASSIGNMENT: This contract represents entire agreement between parties and supersedes all prior written or verbal agreements or representations, and is binding upon heirs, successors, and assigns. This contract is for appraisal, consultation or analytical services only, and shall be fulfilled upon delivery of the report to Client. 3.12 SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES & REPORTS; The professional service fee does not include post consultation for any purpose, court preparation, appearances, conferences, supplemental exhibits, or any other expenses for which consultant is not reimbursed under a specific and separate agreement. Consultation fees shall be billed on the basis of $125 per hour; or any portion thereof. The charge for court appearances, testimony or deposition will be at the minimum rate of $150 per hour. Rates are subject to increase after 6 months from contract date. If testimony or deposition is required by the Consultant due to subpoena, client is responsible for any and all fees, time, expenses and charges incurred by Consultant regardless of the issuing party. Valuation updates, reinspection, analysis, supplemental research, report writing, travel costs and related expenses are to be paid by Client. Additional report copies or originals beyond those as specified in Section 3.3 of this Agreement, shall be billed as supplemental services to the Client at the minimum rate of $100 per report. 3.13 DELINOUENT PAYMENTS & COLLECTION COSTS: In the event that any portion of the compensation for services to the Consultant becomes delinquent, the Client agrees to pay all interest thereon at the rate of 18% per annum on said account from the due date until paid, and shall pay all costs of collection thereof, including reasonable attorney's fees and court costs. The Consultant's fee is for the service rendered and not for accrued time spent on report. 3.14 CANCELLATION OF SERVICES: In the event client desires to cancel this contract, written notice shall be delivered to the Consultant, who shall receive compensation from the Client for all services rendered and costs incurred to date plus all monies advanced in connection with said contract prior to written notice. 3.15 RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTING PARTY: This contract must bear the signature of both parties. The Consultant requires, and Client agrees, that if Client is a corporation, an authorized officer of the corporation shall execute this agreement with individual parties who shall be individually responsible for the contents of this contract in the same manner as the corporation. I IERRA WEST Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants 5 ORJZATIOI�I COT` PRCFE,SsIONAL'SERVIC 3.16 PROVISIONS AND LEGAL JURISDICTION: If any provision of this agreement is determined to be void or unenforceable by any court of proper jurisdiction, such determination shall not affect any other provision of this contract and all such other provisions shall remain in full force/effect. 3.17 CONFORMANCE AND ACCEPTANCE OF REPORT: The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) and the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) have specific reporting and underwriting requirements for real estate loans through federally insured institutions. In addition, most state and/or federally charted lending entities have their own specific set of underwriting and appraisal guidelines and conformance requirements. Unless otherwise implicitly noted under "Specific Criteria" of this contract, the contract services or report are not necessarily intended to conform with current OTS, RTS or other institutional guidelines. Your Consultant makes no warranty relative to the acceptance and/or use of the report by second or subsequent parties for any use other than that use which is identified within this contract. Additional research, analysis and report writing time may be undertaken at a later date and at supplemental fee for time/costs of such if desired or found necessary upon review to meet specific guidelines. 3.18 SUBJECT PROPERTY STATUS: Recent improvements, remodeling, and repairs made to the subject property, along with latent defects, structural or mechanical inadequacies and improvements erected without proper permits and inspections are to be disclosed by the Client. Properties with known building and safety code violations or those that do not meet current requirements as set forth by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or other applicable legislative bodies are to be disclosed by the Client. Information pertaining to recent or pending parceling, rezoning, or entitlements are to be disclosed. 3.19 CLIENT AND/OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIED DATA: It is agreed that the Client, and/or his designees, shall expeditiously furnish to the Consultant the following information and documentation which is deemed necessary to complete the report or service as stated in this contract. O Location Map Q Legal Description X Title Report O Operating Expenses Q 3-Year Sale History O Lease Agreements O Cost Breakdown O Detailed Floor Plan O Building Specs. O Detailed Site Plan O Approvals/Mapping Q Environmental Data O Profiles Q Geologic Data O Engineering O Off -site Specs. X Bond Specifications X As Requested Data supplied to the Consultant, by the Client, designee and/or third parties, shall be assumed materially correct, legally executed and enforceable. No warranty, either expressed or implied, shall be made by the Consultant regarding errors and/or omissions of second party data. Delays in providing the Consultant with the above referenced data may result in an extended report completion and delivery date. The Client shall bear the sole responsibility for any and all causes and possible effects that may arise in connection with the aforementioned delays. '1'lkRRA WEST Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants ATITHORIZNIIONANI:E'CONTRACT!:VOR.PROVESSIONWSERVI 3.19 CLIENT AND/OR THIRD PARTY SUPPLIED DATA (CONT'D): The Client shall provide the Consultant with a recent Title Report of subject property in order to ascertain applicable easements, right-of-ways, deed restrictions or other conditions of title that may have a material impact upon valuation or evaluation. In the event detailed building plans and specifications are not provided to the Consultant, the Client agrees to a possible increase in the stated professional service fee at the Consultant's current hourly rate for actual time spent in order to obtain and verify situs data necessary to complete this contract. 3.20 CONSENT. ACCEPTANCE AND SIGNATURES: UNDERSIGNED, E, M°NS$ PR°V1ISI°NS AND FULLREPONJfliLUflES OF TIIIS CONTtACT FREELY ENTER INTO THIS AGREEME7 FOR STATED 1IZt3FESSIONAL AND APPRAISAL/CONSULTING SERVICES AUTHORIZED INDIVIDUAL: DATE: TYPE OR PRINT NAME: CONSULTANT SIGNATURE: D. Brian Shu way, CA DATE: 05-MAR-92 11k.,RRA WEST Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants 7 CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 4.1 GENERAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Standard No. 2 of the 'Uniform Standards of Professional Practice' of the Appraisal Institute (formerly the A.I.R.E.A.) requires the Appraiser or Consultant to 'clearly and accurately act forth the appraisal in a manner that will not be misleading; contain sufficient information to enable the person(.) who receives or relies on the report to understand it properly; and clearly and accurately disclose any extraordinary assumption or limiting condition that directly affects the appraisal and indicate its impact on value'. In compliance therewith, and to assist the reader in the interpretation of this report, such Contingent and Limiting Conditions are set forth as follows. 4.2 LIMIT OF LIABILITY Liability of the contents and conclusions as contained herein, is limited to the fee collected for preparation of this report. There is no implied or otherwise stated accountability or liability to any third party. 4,3 POSSESSION RIGHTS AND LIMITATIONS Possession of this report or any copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication, nr may it be used for any other than its intended use. The physical report(.) are to remain the sole property of the Consultant for the use of the Client; the fee charged being for analytical services only. This report may not be used by any other person or corporation other than the Client or the party to whom it is addressed or copied without the written consent of the Consultant, and then only in its entirety. 4.4 AUTHENTICITY OF REPORT The authentic and original copy or copies of this tepurt have been signed in blue ink and have an embossed with the name of the Consultant. Any report copy without this seal or signature is unauthorized and may have been altered. 4.5 USE OF THE REPORT Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report shall be conveyed to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or other media without the prior written consent of the author, particularly concerning reference to the valuation conclusion, identity of the Consultant or his firm. 4.6 TRADE SECRETS This report is deemed to consist of 'trade secrets and commercial or financial information' which is privileged and confidential. The data as herein delineated is exempt from disclosure under Section 5 U.S.C. 552 (b) (4). Notification of the Consultant is required in the event of reproducing any part of this report. 4.7 CONFIDENTIALITY The contents of this report are deemed to be confidential. The Consultant shall not divulge valuation information or conclusions derived therefrom without the prior written consent of the Client or his designee except as may be required by a court of law, legal body with power of subpoena or professional appraisal organization in confidence for ethics enforcement. However, disclosure of the assignment to others may occur during the investigative process, 4.8 RELIABILITY OF REPORTED INFORMATION The information contained in this report has been obtained from sources deemed to be both reliable and accurate. The information and data is believed correct but can in no way be guaranteed. No responsibility is assumed for the accuracy of information furnished by or from others, the Client, hie designee, public records or commercial information services. 4.9 ALTERATIONS AND REVISIONS This report is to be used only in its entirety. All conclusions and opinions concerning the analysis as set forth in the report were prepared by the Consultant(e) whose signature appears on this report; unless otherwise indicated. The Consultant reserves the unlimited right to alter, amend, revise or rescind any of the statements, findings, opinions, values, estimates, or conclusions upon subsequent information that may become available or made known to him. No change of any item in this report shall be made by anyone other than the Consultant. No responsibility is assumed by your Consultant for any such alterations or unauthorized changes made. 4.10 VALUATION CONVEYANCE Thc report covers the described real property only. The analysis or figures used herein, or any units derived therefrom, are not to be construed as being applicable to arty other property; either upon the same or different assumptions, however similar the same may be. TIERRA WEST Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants CONTINGENTAND'"LIMTTINCONDTTIONS 4.11 DATE OF VALUE & PURCHASING POWER The date of value to which any of the conclusions and opinions expressed in this report apply, is set forth in the Letter of Transmittal. Further, that the dollar amount of any value opinion herein rendered is based upon the purchasing power of the American Dollar on that date. 4.12 COMPONENT VALUES The distribution of the total valuation in this report between land and improvements applies only under the existing program of utilization. Component values for land and/or building are not intended to be used in conjunction with any other property or appraisal and arc invalid if so used. 4.13 EXHIBITS The maps, plats, sketches, graphs, photographs and exhibits included in this report are for illustration purposes only and are to be utilized only to assist in visualizing matters discussed within this report. Except as specifically stated, data relative to size or area of the subject and comparable properties has been obtained from sources deemed accurate and reliable. None of the exhibits are to be removed, reproduced or used apart from this report. 4.14 MARKETABLE TT1LE No opinion as to the status of the subject property's title is rendered. Data related to ownership and legal description was obtained from public records and is considered reliable. Title is assumed to be marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, easements and restrictions except those specifically mentioned in this report. The property is evaluated and/or valuation assuming responsible ownership under competent management, and available for its Highest and Best Use. 4.15 AUXILIARY AND RELATED STUDIES Values and opinions expressed presume that environmental and other governmental restrictions/conditions by applicable agencies have been met including but not limited to seismic hazards, flood plains, flight patterns, decibel levels/noise envelopes, fire hazards, hillside ordinances, density, allowable uses, building codes, permits, licenses etc. No survey, engineering study or architectural analysis has been made known to your Consultant unless otherwise stated within the body of this report. 4.16 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT Thc Consultant assumes that the subject property analyzed herein will be under prudent and competent management and ownership; neither inefficient nor superefficient. 4.17 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. LEGAL ISSUES AND HIDDEN MATTERS No responsibility shall be assumed or incurred by the Consultant for matters which are legal in nature or which require specialized investigation or knowledge beyond that which is customarily employed by real estate Appraisers/Consultants. Unless otherwise slated in this report, the existence of hazardous material, which may or may not be present on the property, was not observed by the appraiser. This report is predicated upon there being no hidden, unapparent or apparent conditions affecting the property site, soil, structures, mechanical, electrical or plumbing equipment, including deficiencies, infestation, toxic or hazardous materials which could possibly cause a loss in value. No judgement is made as to presence of asbestos, urea -formaldehyde foam insulation, adequacy of insulation or the specific energy efficiency of the improvements or equipment unless otherwise stated in the report. 4.18 MARKET VALUE The estimate of "Market Value', as referred to in the report, is not based in whole or in part upon the race, color, national origin or religious affiliation of the owners or occupants of the properties in the vicinity of the property appraised. 4.19 MINERAL RIGHTS No opinion is expressed herein as to the value of the subsurface mineral deposits, whether they be gas, liquid or solid. Nor are the rights associated with extraction or exploration of such elements considered unless otherwise stated in this appraisal report. TIERRA WEST Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants 9 4.20 FURNISHINGS AND EQUIPMENT All furnishings, equipment and business operations except as specifically stated and typically considered as part of real property, have been disregarded with only real property being considered in the report unless otherwise stated. Any existing or proposed improvements, on or off -site, as well as any alterations or repairs considered, are assumed to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices based upon the information submitted to your appraiser. This report may be subject to amendment upon reinspection of the subject property subsequent to repairs, modifications, alterations and completed new construction. Any estimate of Market Value is as of the date indicated; based upon the information, conditions and projected levels of operation. 4.21 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE FEES The contract for appraisal, consultation or analytical services is fulfilled and the total fee payable upon completion. The Consultant, by reason of rendering this report, shall not required to give testimony or to be in attendance in any court, hearing or other meeting with reference to the matters herein, in full or in part, nor engage in any post appraisal consultation with the Client or third parties except under separate and special arrangements. Post contractual fees shall be billed on the basis of $125 per hour or any portion thereof so engaged. The charge for any court appearances, testimony or deposition by the Consultant will be billed at the minimum rate of $200 per hour. Court preparation and other related pre -appearance activities shall be billed at the Consultants general hourly rate of $125. All travel time, mileage and other related expenses incurred in such activities shall also be paid by the Client on a colt basis. 4.22 DEFICIENCY COSTS If the Consultant has not been supplied with a termite inspection, survey or occupancy permit, no responsibility or representation is assumed or made for any costs associated with obtaining same or for any deficiencies discovered before or after they are obtained. Na representation or warranty is made concerning obtaining these items. The Consultant assumes no responsibility for any costs or consequences arising due to the need, or the lack of need, for flood hazard insurance. An agent for the Federal Flood Insurance Program should be contacted to determine the actual need for Flood Hazard Insurance. 4.23 MARKET DYNAMICS & ALTERATION OF REPORT The estimate of Fair Market Value, which may be defined within the body of this report, is subject to change with market fluctuations over lime. Market value is highly related to exposure, time, promotion effort, terms, motivation, and conditions surrounding the offering. The value estimate(s) consider the productivity and relative attractiveness of the property; both physically and economically in the open market. 4.24 AFTER TAX ANALYSIS AND/OR VALUATION Any "after tax' income or investment analysis and resultant measures of return on investment are intended to reflect only the possible and general market considerations, whether as part of estimating value or estimating possible returns on investment at an assumed value or price paid. Any stated conclusion referred to as "Investment Value' should not be construed as being representative of "Market Value' since the prospectus of the Client may be based upon individual investment requirements, as distinguished from the concept of market value, which is impersonal and detached. Market value and investment value may coincide when a client's investment criteria are consistent with prevailing market trends and conditions. In this instance, the two value estimates may be numerically identical, but the two types of value are not interchangeable. The Consultant does not claim expertise in tax matters and advises client to seek competent tax advice from a qualified income tax advisor. 4.25 ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF THE REPORT Acceptance and/or use of this report constitutes full acceptance of the Contingent and Limiting Conditions and special assumptions as set forth in this report. It is the responsibility of the Client, or client's designees, to read in full, comprehend and thus become aware of the aforementioned contingencies and limiting conditions. Neither the Consultant or his firm assumes responsibility for any situation arising out of the Client's failure to become familiar with and understand the same. The Client is advised to retain experts in areas that fall outside the scope of the real estate appraisal/consulting profession if so desired. TT IS NSIBILITY OF CLIENT TO READ AND THEREFORE BECOME AWAREOF P RAMIFICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE AFOREMENTIONED CONTINGENT LIMITING CONDITIONS AS THEY MAY PERTAIN TO USE OF THIS REPORT FOR ANY GIVEN APPLICATION TIERRA WEST Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants 10 OFESSIONAEI QUAT CATIONS.; 5.1 EDUCATION & BACKGROUND: Hemet High School - Graduated 1971 University of California, San Diego (UCSD) 1971-1973 Brigham Young University (BYU), Bachelor's Degree (BA) - Industrial Design 1977 Post Graduate Education (Exam/Testing Courses): Appraisal Institute (Al - Formerly AIREA): Real Estate Appraisal Principles (1A-1) 1981 Appraisal and Valuation Procedures (1A-2) 1981 Standards of Professional Practice (2-3) 1981 Capitalization Theory & Techniques GB -A) 1985 Capitalization Theory & Techniques (1B-B) 1985 Case Studies in Real Estate Valuation (2-1) 1986 Valuation Analysis and Report Writing (2-2) 1986 Uniform Standards of Professional Practice (A) 1981 & 1991 International Right-of-way Association (IRWA): The Appraisal of Partial Acquisitions 1989 Skills of Expert Testimony 1990 University of California, Riverside (UCR): Survey of Land Development Procedures 1989 Economic Development Management 1991 Geographic Information Systems 1991 Continuing Education & Professional Seminars: Litigation & Fractional Interests (AI) 1987 & 1990 Interpretation of Engineering Drawings (AI) 1989 Easement Valuation (AI) 1989 & 1991 Shopping Center Analysis (AI) 1987 GIS & LIS Applications (ACSM/ASPRS/AAG/URISA)t 1990 5.2 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS. MEMBERSHIP & DESIGNATIONS: State of California - General Certified Real Estate Appraiser Appraisal Institute - MAI "Candidate": #M84-0619 American Association of Certified Appraisers - CA-S "Certified Appraiser - Senior Member": #3416 National Assoc. of Review Appraisers & Mtg Underwriters CRA "Certified Review Appraiser": #15898 Board of Realtors - Affiliate Member: Hemet -San Jacinto, Lake Elsinore Valley, Rancho-Temecula-Murrieta, Riverside, Idyllwild, Palm Desert and Sun City Licensed Real Estate Agent - State of Utah Licensed Contractor - State California (C-27 License) & State of Utah Other Professional Memberships & Affiliations: Urban Land Institute, International Right -of -Way Association, Urban & Regional Information Systems Association, American Planning Association, American Archaeological Institute of America (MA), Riverside County Economic Development Council, Valley Economic Development Corporation (1990/91 Chairman & 1989 Vice Chairman), Hemet City Chamber of Commerce, San Jacinto City Chamber of Commerce, Better Business Bureau 1 The American Congress of Surveying and Mapping:(ACSM), The American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS), The Association ofAmerican Geographers (AAG), The Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA): GIS & US refers to Geographic & Land Information Systems. TIERRA WEST Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants 11 •PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS OF .,..... „. , 5.3 PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND & ACTIVITY: February 1982 to Present: Principal consultant and founder of TIERRA WEST, Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants. TIERRA WEST, with the main office located in Hemet, California, has provided real estate related appraisal and consulting services for most all types of real property to both the private and public sectors. Primary services currently provided include: o Real Property Appraisals o Market Studies o Project Feasibility o Highest & Best Use Analysis o Investment & Pro -forma Modeling o Market Data Research & Statistical Analysis o Expert Witness & Testimony o Appraisal Review Services o Land Use & Entitlement Assistance o Fiscal Impact & Economic Studies September 1977 to February 1982: Employed as a real estate appraiser by private real estate appraisal and consulting firm located in Salt Lake City, Utah. Assignments included appraisal and related services for various types of investment grade commercial, retail, office, industrial & residential projects throughout the western United States. November 1977 to October 1981: Project Manager for Foxmoor Properties, a real estate development and management company located in Salt Lake City, Utah. Primary responsibilities included management and implementation of property acquisitions, zone changes, land use planning, entitlements/approvals and off -site improvements. Property type, by land use, included residential subdivisions, planned unit developments, multi -family and commercial projects. Additional activities included preparation of market research studies, land use analysis and management of property database. 5.4 EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY: Expert witness testimony has been provided in both State and Federal Courts including Superior and Bankruptcy Courts for a variety of clients. 5.5 GEOGRAPHIC SERVICE AREAS: The majority of recent appraisal and consulting services have been performed in Southern California. However, valuations assignment have been completed throughout the Western United States in such states as Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Texas, Utah & Washington. Certified real estate appraisal services are currently offered only in the State of California. TIERRA WEST Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants 12 5.6 REAL PROPERTY REPORT USES: Real property appraisal reports and related services have been utilized by clients for such purposes as mortgage financing, purchase, sale, estates, trusts, division of interests, foreclosures, income tax and IRS consequences, inheritance, divorce, eminent domain, right-of-ways, condemnation, development funding, legal issues, tax appeal, development feasibility, investment decisions and internal rate of return analysis, bond financing etc. 5.7 TYPES QF REAL PROPERTY APPRAISED: VACANT ACREAGE: Inland valley, desert, mountain, beach front, farm land, orchards, ranches, state and federal lands including national parks, potential habitat areas for endangered species, reservoir acquisition, and acreage for virtually most all types of commercial, industrial, residential and special use properties. IMPROVED & PROPOSED RETAIL/COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES: Single and multi -tenant general commercial and retail buildings, neighborhood and regional shopping centers, strip centers, mixed -use facilities, malls etc. IMPROVED & PROPOSED OFFICE: Single and multi -tenant general offices, medical buildings, office condominiums (low and mid -rise facilities). IMPROVED & PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL: General and specific use single and multi -tenant industrial buildings, warehouses, factories, research and development parks, manufacturing centers, mini -storage etc. IMPROVED & PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL: Single and multi -family residential units, apartment complexes, condominiums, condo conversions, planned unit developments and specific plans. Appraisals have been prepared for various tracts from the pre - entitlement phase through build -out and sale of completed product. SPECIAL USE PROPERTIES: This category would include such properties as golf courses, tennis and racquetball facilities, resorts, radio stations, nursing homes, convalescent hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, equestrian facilities, RV parks, mortuaries, churches, automotive repair centers, service stations, full -service car washes, banks, restaurants, hotels, motels, private and public schools, government and public use buildings, proposed reservoir sites etc. TILRRA WEST Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants 13 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS OF 5.8 PARTIAL LIST OF SELECTED CLIENTELE: BANKS, SAVING & LOANS Adobe Savings Bank American Savings Bank Bank of Buffalo Lake Bank of California Bank of Hemet Bank of Palm Springs Bank of San Francisco Bank- of the West Carver Savings & Loan Citicorp Savings City Federal Savings Bank Coast Savings Bank Executive Savings & Loan First Interstate Bank First National Bank First Trust Bank Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Great American Bank Hemet Federal Savings & Loan Home Federal Savings Independence Savings & Loan Inland Empire National Bank Inland Savings & Loan La Jolla Savings Bank North America Savings & Loan Overland Bank Pacific Coast Savings & Loan Palm Springs Savings Bank Provident Federal Savings Redlands Federal Savings & Loan Scripps Bank Secure Savings & Loan Security Pacific National Bank Southwest Bank State Savings & Loan Surety Federal Savings Tokai Bank of California Union Bank United California Savings Bank Wells Fargo Bank Western Federal Savings & Loan Western Financial Savings Bank IIERRA WEST Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants 14 ONAL QUALIFICATIONS OF.. . BRIAN SFIUIVIWAY 5.8 PARTIAL LIST OF SELECTED CLIENTELE (CONT'D): MORTGAGE COMPANIES. THRIFTS ETC. American Mortgage Express, Corp. Arca Financial Bancsmiths Mortgage Corp. Cal Fed Mortgage California Mortgage Consultants Commonwealth Capital Mortgage Corona Mortgage Charter Financial D & B Mortgage Services, Inc. Darby Mortgage Dawn Financial Delson Financial Directors Mortgage Entree Mortgage Evans Financial First Interstate Mortgage First Reliance of America Glenfed Mortgage Corp. Golden Equity Financial Golden Pacific Mortgage Granite Mortgage Center Great American Appraisal Services Greater Suburban Mortgage Hobson Funding LB. Financial Mark 1 Mortgage Corp. Metmor Financial Mical Mortgage, Inc. Mid -America Financial Services, Inc. Mid-Pac Mortgage Mountain View Financial, Inc. New West Mortgage Corp. North American Financial Corp. North Oak Priority Financial Rancho American Mortgage Riverside Thrift & Loan SW Mortgage Trader's Mortgage Tustin Thrift & Loan Western Cities Mortgage TIERRA WEST Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants 15 PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS 5.8 PARTIAL LIST OF SELECTED CLIENTELE (CONT'D): GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES: California State Department of Transportation City of Hemet City of Palm Springs Los Angeles Police Department Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Resolution Trust Corp. (RTC) Riverside County United States Department of the Interior United States Small Business Administration UTILITIES & MUNICIPALITIES: Eastern Municipal Water District Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Southern California Edison DISTRICTS: Hemet Unified School District Perris School District Romoland School District San Jacinto Unified School District Valley Wide Parks & Recreation District CORPORATE: AMCAST Aerospace Products Barton, Klugman & Getting Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. Cal Gas Corporation Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Coldwell Banker Deloitte & Touche Thomas, Luebs & Mort E.F. Hutton Farmers Insurance Group Founders Title Group Goodyear Corporation Hope Trust Deed Company Hughes Aircraft Corporation J nrkheed Corporation Merrill Lynch Peacock-Raddaker Development RANCON Real Estate Santa Anita Development Seventh -day Adventist Church Spartan Oil Corporation 1 lERRA WEST Real Estate Appraisers & Consultants 1 6 433- /6 ]a JCSsf '3 4^Snwi' ,9 9a-19 ,/ S r -•no•6, ,r. Jr ,l?-,a 1, •la,•9I er dl Jl Pa e mv.awrr.a .r. I toJr. •,I 'C A. 010- 055 010 - 056 09/ _ 060 091-06/ 010-057 0/0- 060 010- 06/ bi SEVCN POR RO S,4N ✓AC/NTO V/E✓O CI 2 MS d/357 S0 San ✓Demo/c Lon. Asroc,orlan Pod 13//60- 63 Parcel' Mop 20795 MS 8/5/ K,rr/er Roncn %'oe/ Add/ll0n Sr Sr Poe m6 `aC. J`6_ A_ l ra.r, S,P -pea Car, 66 A, Et e/j57 so •\ }I} �a• a010-r,9♦ ,S.l5/4S E-"OOI-- AC. OR. 66, .a 6.8/J5T5.D, ,1m0- aC POR.P,R. 6, R. O /60 -SSESSCf7S A'-:F >K P,q r5 SHIP TO: CLIENT SPECIAL ADDRESS: I IJ TSI OFFICF No.677902 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - _ -- `---- CLIENT NUMBER FIRST TRANS. NUMBER LAST TRANS. NUMBER 5880 COMMERCE BOULEVARD TODAY DATE / ` /9 TRANSMITTALS TO BE USED WITHIN 24 MONTHS FROM TODAY'S DATE ROHNERT PARK, CALIFORNIA 94928 MASTER TO1-A".E4T MEMO TOTAL TRANSMITTALS PURCHASED PHONE :7071 584-4225 CL: ENT NO, TRANSMITTALS FOR MASTER SUB - CLIENT NO. TRANSMITTALS THIS SUB -CLIENT (No Status) NEV.;pF ORDER i REORDER E;t EHCi SE OPTION PHASE (I % MONTHS % OPTION PURCHASER HAS OPTION TO 6UY CLIENT NAME (PRINTONL Y1 281 ADDITIONAL TRANSAiITTALS FOR S CONTINUED (IF APPLICABLE) i281 IF OPTION IS EXERCISED WITHIN in DAYS FRflMTODAY'S DATE. ADDRESS (231 CITY (15) STATE 121 ZIP OR POSTAL CODE COUNTY OR MUNICIPALITY ,JO qy� {AREA COON CLIENT PHONE NUMBER I EXTENSION NO. REGION NO. SLSM. NO, )AREA CODEI TSI PHONE NO. 1 ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE CYCLE FREEZE SKIPS TEXT SIC CODE TYPE CF BUSINESS I/We agree to pay the balance of $ installments of not less than 5 each, The first payment will be due / /19 and the final payment due on / /19 . In case suit or action is instituted to collect this note or any portion thereof, the below named buyer(s) promises to pay all collection costs and such additional sums as the court may adjudge reasonable such as court costs, attorney fees, service of process, etc. in said suit or action. AMOUNT OF ORDER Skips $ Expired S Lost/Misc. $ GUARANTEE .,,NSWORLD SYSTEMS INC. guarantees the purchase of the collection service, f used in accordance with complete instructions contained in the transmittal folder and Instructions printed on the numbered transmittals, that the purchaser 1; will collect a minimum of two times the total purchase price of the transmittals purchased within 85 days after submitting the final transmittal for servicing, provided all transmittals are used within 24 months from date of purchase, or TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS INC. will, at its option, (1) refund the complete purchase price of said transmittals to the purchaser, or (21 refund the cash difference between the amount collected and double the amount invested for the above transmittals to the purchaser. b (This Guarantee only applies to orders where the account balances average $50 or more.) (SEE BELOW FOR CONDITIONS) TAX (+1 (IF APPLICABLE) TOTAL AMOUNT DUE LESS (—) AMOUNT PAID BALANCE DUE MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO: TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS INC. Ali transmittals must be filled out completely with correct debtor addresses, not involving bankrupt accounts or accounts which are beyonc 12 months from date of last payment or charge. Our written guarantee will apply if you have used all transmittals within 24 months from dat of purchase in accordance with printed instructions contained in the transmittal folder, on the transmittals, and herein. Transworld System Inc. assumes no responsibility for nor does it authorize any statements, acts, or promises of any person other than the written statements an( guarantee contained herein, The Hold Harmless Agreement, paragraphs 8 and 9 on the reverse of this form, will apply on all of the abovr transmittals purchased. The purchaser authorizes Transworld Systems Inc. to forward any negotiable instruments received directly to thr purchaser. MAIL RETURNS — If mail is returned, Transworld Systems Inc. will notify client of the skip and cancel that account. To obtain a replacemen transmittal, ciient must return the Mail Return Notification and a check for 53.00 (subject to change) to cover handling costs within 60 day of notification of the skip. If the $3.00 fee and Mail Return Notification are not returned within 60 days, the account will be classified as pail in full and that amount will count toward satisfaction of the Guarantee. If Freeze Skip option selected, replacement credit will be granted onl' on reorder and the dollar amount of the skipped accounts will be counted in total performance and Guarantee satisfaction. R'S SIGNATURE -URCNASEP'5 NAME WHITE ORIGINAL WRITE DUPLICATE ELLOW PINK TO TSI CORPORATE OFFICE TO CUSTOMER TO TS! CORPORATE OFFICE TO ACCOUNT R EPR ES ENTATIVE REPRESENTATIVE'S SIGNATURE rnANSPPORLD SYSTEMS INC FORM T511-129 (3-99) TROMAS M. COX DAMES A. COX BEVERLY M. CAMPER March 12, 1992 COX, COX & CAMPER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW HCS EAST FLORIDA AVENUE HEMET, CALIFOR NIA 92543 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Jim Cox Re: Appraisal of lots in Assessment Dist 87-1 Retainer Contract Wity Tierra West Dear Mr. Mayor and Members of the City Council, A 3 -1? - 9a- TELEPHONE AREA CODE 714 5S2-14O0 FAX :7k0 652-3990 Before you is the retainer agreement for appraisal services of certain lots in Assessment District 87-1. The appraisal is advised by our special counsel in the pending litigation for the foreclosure of delinquent assessments by certain owners. Despite the cap stated in the contract for fees, we expect that the actual cost to the City will not exceed $3,000.00. Respectfully, James A. Cox RECOMMENDATION: Approve action authorizing Mayor to execute retainer agreement with Tierra West as modified. 31 Oil V V V R .V V 10 TV IV 90 Tv IV 90 ITV Sly '90 ITv 1lv /90 RIVERSIDE, CA. REDI H 14 Nationwide 1-800-345-REDI Copylilht 1931 All f icRht5 F . p, r_; TOTAL VALUE -TV LAND VALUE-IV OTHER VALUE-., TOTAL TAXES/YR 548,859TV $48,859LV S7,004.48/90 ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER OWNERS NAME MAILING ADDRESS .PROPERTY LOCATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION TAK AREA CEIJ( !IS TRAC I 433-160-034 10-056 SOBBOBA ASSOC 2020 SANTACO MONICA 51H FL SANTA MONICA CA 90404 1.57 ACRES MIL IN PO PAR '1 I'M 11i060 PM 20/95 THOMAS BROS MAP NUMBER 433-160-035 10-056 S0BB08A ASSOC 2020 SANTACO MONICA 5TH FL SANTA MONICA CA 90404 3.46 ACRES M/L IN PAR 3 PM 131/060 PM 0795: 433-160-036 10-056 F t B ASSOC 930 INDIAN PEAK DP NO 225 ROLLING HILLS ESTA1FS TA 902/4 2.18 ACRES MlL IN PAR 4 PM Ii1/0 PM 0795 433-160-037 10-056 SCRIPPS CORNER ASSOC GOODWIN ROSLYN C/O RICHARD EVONS P 0 BOX 3683 SAN DIEGO CA 92103 2.03 ACRES M/L IN PAR 7 PM 131/060 PM '0795 433-160-038 10-055 50000A ASSOC 3350 OCEAN PARK BLV 106 SANTA MONICA CA 90405 2.37 ACRES Mil IN PAR 5 PM 131/060 PM 20795 LAND USE/PROPERTY CLASS VERIFILD SALES SALE AMOUNT LOT SITE / ACRES / SOFT AMOUNT TYPE DATE STATISTICAL INFORMATION DATE DOLUMBER TEAGE INFORMATION TYPE AMOUNT ------------------------- -y4L-c01m:RL:AL - 03-86 ,-,!! tu-C.'.-00u-u 86-0057300 1.!;70-ACRES Cr -VAC-COMMERCIAL PUI CD-C24-000-0 3.460-ACRES 03-86 86-0057300 5109,419TV $109,419LV S24,271.62/90 C/-VAC-COMMERCIAL I'UI (D-(24-000-0 2.180-ACRES $160 OOOF IRO 10-90 90-0586367 PRIOR; 03-06 86-0057300 $308.6001v S308,600LV $15,278.56/90 T -VAC-COMMERCIAL PLO CD-(24-000-0 2.030-ACRES Cl -COMMERCIAL PUI CD-006-000-0 2.370-ACRES OCD 12-09 69-0426272 PRIOR: 1332,000E GRTD 11-8e ee-0329504 4 -86 86-00557300 433-160-039 10-055 S000BA ASSOC C/o 0 I. C CO 2020 SANTA MONICA 5TH Fl SANTA MONICA CA 90404 3.80 ACRES M/L IN PAR 6 PM 131/060 PM 20795 CY -VAC-COMMERCIAL PUI CD-C24-000-0 3.800-ACRES 03-86 66-0057295 $345,412Tv 1345,412LV Si' '35.92/90 51,548.648TV $96,334LV 51.452.514[V S_'1,776.06/90 $114,402TV 5114.4022LV $26,910.72/90 RIVERSIDE, CA. REDI G 14 N..uonwide 1-800-345-REDI Copyright 1991 All Fights Reserved ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER TO CENSUS THOMOS BROS LAND USE/PROPERTY CLASS VERIFIED SALES SALE AMOUNT TOTAL VALUE -TV OWNERS NAME AREA TRACT MAP NUMBER LOT SIZE / ACRES / SOFT AMOUNT TYPE DATE LAND VALUE-LV MAILING ADDRESS SIAFISTICAL INFORMATION DATE DOC NUMBER IMPRV VALUE -IV %PROPERTY LOCATION MORTGAGE INFORMATION OTHER VALUE-00 LEGAL DESCRIPTION TYPE AmouNT TOTAL TAXES/YR LY-VA(-(ommERCIA( 03-86 $5,910Tv 433OBO A0A4 10-067 S5,910LV SOBOBA ASSOCRIVE Pui CD [24-000 0 86-0057300 56,400.64/90 -.11630 RIVERSIDE DR .220-ACRES NORTH HOLLYWOOD CA 91602 .22 ACRES M/L IN POR LOT 65 MB 008/357 5D SAN JACINTO RANCHO 433-160-02? : 10-060 SOBOBA ASSOC' .'C/O PETER SIDLOW 7:11650 RIVERSIDE DR NORTH HOLLYWOOD CA 71602 .32 ACRES M/L IN i'OR PAR 1 PM 131/060 PM 207'05 CY -VAC-COMMERCIAL PUI CD-C24-000-0 .320-ACRES 11-85 85-0255793 433-160-028 `` 10-067 S060BBpAD ASSOCC/trC CO 2020 SANTA MONICA 5TH FL SANTA MONICA CA 90404 1.72 ALRES M/L IN POP PAR 8 PM 131/060 PM 20,95 (Y -VAC-COMMERCIAL PUI CD-C24-000-0 1.720-ACRES 514,$51TV 514, 51LV S8,246.52/90 03-86 546,543TV 86-0057301 $6,519.50/90 433-160-029' 10-055 SOBOBA ASSOC' C/O D CO 2020 SANTA MONICA 5TH FL SANTA MONICA CA 90404 "4.42:ACRES M/L IN POR PAR 9 PM 131/060 PM 20/9 Pul CO-C24-0CY 0MMDRCIAL 66-0057 01 ' 511,364LV .420-ACRES $6,620.48A90 433-160-032 10-056 SOBOBA AMC C/pp D` C CO 'r j 2020'SANTA MONICA 5TH FL SANTAYMONICA.CA 90404 <'2:161ACRES'M/L IN POR PAR 1 PM 131/060 PM 20/95 433-160-033' q 10-056 5000BA ASSOC CIO D t, C-CO 2020 SANTA SO AMONICACACFLA 5TH 90404 2.82.'ACRES M/L 1u PAR 2 PM 131/060 PM 20795 CY -VAC-COMMERCIAL 03-tt6 $65,751TV PUI CD-C24-000-0 86-0057500 1E,7,5,75%1 2.160-ACRES CY-VAC-COMMERCIAL 086- 057300 tE/,2271VV' PUI CD-C24-000-0 S19,321.999000/90 2.820-ACRES R:.: RED ASSES`', 04*'E MA 6PROPi 433-17 NEEL EL ■6835A 433-17 KARN 67 SA 673� • 433-17 66 SA •663 r,ncorrnr rA f.:VERS A TO: FROM: Via Pam S. Easter, City Manager STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development SUBJ: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 4-91 AND CHANGE OF ZONE 9-91 DATE: March 12, 1992 APPLICANT: KEITH AND LEATRICE HENNINGSEN 26190 Thacker Drive Hemet, Ca. 92544 (714)927-7193 DESCRIPTION A request to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan from High Density Residential to Light Industrial; and to change the zone from R-3 (Multiple Family) to M-1 (Light Manufacturing), on 10 acres located on the southwest corner of Esplanade and Santa Fe Avenue. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends the Council take the following actions: 1. Adopt the attached Resolution approving General Plan Amendment 4-91 subject to Findings of Fact, and adopt a Negative Declaration. 2. Introduce the attached Ordinance approving Change of Zone 9-91 subject to Findings of Fact, and adopt a Negative Declaration. DISCUSSION On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on the above cases, no adverse testimony was received. Staff had recommended approval of the zone change, and General Plan Amendment. The Planning Commission also reviewed and approved Tentative Parcel Map 27169 subject to Council Approval of General Plan Amendment 4-91 and Change of Zone 9-91. Attached for your information is a copy of the Staff Report to the Planning Commission. Page No. 2 As you may recall this property was previously designated for a multiple family housing project to be developed by Esplanade Associates, using Multifamily Mortgage Revenue Bonds. The City Council acted at its March 3rd, 1992 meeting to release the property from the requirement to construct this housing project. Respectfully Submitted, BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development Attachments: Staff Report Ordinance Resolution STAFF REPORT TO: Chahman Ver Plank and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: February 26, 1992 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 4-91, CHANGE OF ZONE 9-91 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 27169 APPLICANT: KEITH AND LEATRICE HENNINGSEN 26190 Thacker Drive Hemet, CA 92544 (714) 927-7193 ENGINEER: CALIFORNIA CONTRACT SURVEY CO. 26076 Fiesta Place Hemet, CA 92344 (714) 927-4486 DESCRIPTION (1) A proposal to amend the T and Use Element of the General Plan from High Density Residential to Light Industrial; to change the zone from R-3 (Multiple Family) to M-1 (Light Manufacturing); and to subdivide the site into 6 industrial parcels. The site encompasses 10 acres which are generally located south of Esplanade Avenue, west of Santa Fe Avenue. EXHIBIT "A" BASE MAP EXHIBIT "B" EXISTING USES EXHIBIT "C" EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT "D" PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT "E" EXISTING ZONING EXHIBIT "F" PROPOSED ZONING EXHIBIT "G" CIRCULATION ELEMENT PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 1 BACKGROUND In June 1985, Degen Development submitted a proposal for a 240 unit apartment development. To finance the project, Degen Development applied for and received funding through multifamily revenue bonds. Degen Development submitted Tentative Parcel Map 22638, a three lot parcel map The Planning Commission approved the map on August 3, 1987 with conditions. For unknown reasons the proposed apartment development did not transpire and the approved site plan expired. On July 28, 1989 the City received a proposal from Esplanade Associates (Degen Development) for a 240 unit apartment. During the preliminary study of the planned project it was found that the proposal did not meet the City's updated multifamily residential requirements. Esplanade Associates submitted a new proposal (1 1 25689) in December of 1989. This proposal was to subdivide the site into 40 residential lots. The Planning Commission reviewed the map and asked if the property facing Esplanade Avenue could be designated commercial and leave the south half as residential. The developer submitted a revised map as directed and the Planning Commission approved the tentative tract map on March 14, 1990. However, the zoning to allow the commercial use on Esplanade Avenue was never approved or ratified. The site eventually changed hands, and the current owner envisions a different use for the site as evidenced by this proposal. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The environmental review identified the following impacts the project has on the City and its services. These impacts must be discussed in greater detail in order to understand their full implications. Local and Regional Drainage Local drainage is that water that is generated by run off and is carried to the regional system via the streets, ditches, small open drainage chanriels, and storm sewers usually sized less than 36" or not a part of the regional master plan. Normally, the developer is responsible for all the cost of improvement for local drainage. In the case of this subdivision, the incremental increase in surface runoff must be retained onsite to prevent potential hazardous impacts to downstream properties. The subject property lies within a zone "X" (unshaded) indicating the site is not in an area of the 500 year flood, an areas protected by the 100 year flood by levees. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 2 Regional drainage is the cumulative impact of local run off. Local run-off must be conveyed consistent with the Regional Master Drainage Plan for the City. The impact on regional drainage will be mitigated by payment of storm drain fees (Currently $4,975/Ac). Circulation Local roadways and intersections are of course, impacted by additional traffic. A lot in an industrial subdivision generally averages 60 vehicle trips per day per acre. Additionally, the proposed M-1 zoning allows commercial uses as well which generate substantially more vehicle trips per day up to 700 per acre. Added traffic creates needs for controlled intersections. The major intersections closest to the development are the ones impacted most by the traffic. As other roadway options are available, the impacts geometrically reduce. However, the cumulative impact of all development together may create a need for signalization at intersections farther away from the development. Based exclusively on manufacturing uses, the project has the potential to generate approximately 600 vehicle trips per day. The streets receiving the greatest amount of this traffic will be Esplanade Avenue and Santa Fe Avenue, as well as the street developed to access the site from Santa Fe Avenue. The mitigation fee for traffic signalization is currently $2700 per acre, to be paid prior to building permit issuance or unless there is an immediate need, at the time of map recordation. There are two regional roads that pass through San Jacinto, Ramona Expressway and Sanderson Avenue. They are regional because they are used to transport people efficiently around the cities to destinations outside the valley. Neither of these streets are constructed to their ultimate and the existing roadways for each are in need of repair. While it may not be appropriate to expect a development contiguous to a regional roadway to finance total construction of the roadway, it is fair to expect that development to pay its fair share. There is approximately $4,686,400.00 of new construction needed to be performed in the City limits and $1,000,000.00 in needed maintenance. Traditional funding sources are not adequate for these improvements. The developers should pay their fair share for this work while the City must also participate on behalf of the existing population. This cost breaks down to $820.00 per acre for the 11 square miles of property in the City. Additional development with its added traffic has an impact on existing streets. Industrial traffic generally has heavier traffic. Commercial areas attracts traffic. All of this leads to a breakdown of the streets. Development also adds more street mileage to maintain. The funding sources for road maintenance are essentially the same as those for road construction. These sources don't begin to cover the road repairs needed. There are approximately 100 miles of roadway in the City that need some degree of maintenance. The estimated cost of this maintenance is $5,000,000 for the next ten years. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 3 The City will receive approximately $1,500,000 from outside sources during this time period for road maintenance. This adds up to a cost of $500.00 per acre or $5,000.00 for Tentative Parcel Map 27169. This will pay for maintenance and road maintenance equipment to reduce the cost of the work. Public Safety As more development occurs, it naturally creates a need to expand public safety services. The type of development determines the impact on public services. Typically, police service is impacted to a greater extent than fire service, which is not to minimize fire service impacts. In any case, the need for more personnel creates a direct need to have equipment for the additional personnel. The staffing level that the City of San Jacinto is seeking to maintain is 2.5 non supervisorial police per 1000 people. The average cost of police personnel and equipment in 1988 was approximately $37.00 per person per year, for non- supervisorial personnel. Additionally, new development also creates a need to house additional personnel and equipment. Funding sources for the entire police budget, such as property taxes and sales taxes also provide the funding for general governmental services. In San Jacinto, the budget for the Police Department exceeds these revenue sources. The ultimate goal of the San Jacinto Fire Department is to be able to respond to all calls within 5 minutes. As development occurs, farther from the City core, the response time drops. The City currently has one fire station in the center of town. Additionally, there will be a need for additional sites to service future construction. The cost of construction of a fire station is currently about $250,000 and a fire engine costs $225,000 to purchase and equip. Staffing for a fire station also runs approximately $250,000 per year. The traditional funding sources for fire services are identical to those for police service. As indicated above, the development will create a demand upon public safety services. Therefore, the developer shall join Public Safety Mello -Roos District #3 to mitigate impacts on public safety staffing levels and pay mitigation fees in effect at the time building permits are issued. Air Quality All development that induces motor vehicle usage has a negative impact on the environment. A single project creates few problems. The cumulative impacts of all development within a region, including smoke, tank discharge, auto emission, length of drive, location of business in the region, and housing availability and cost all influence the air quality. The main polluter is the motor vehicle idling in traffic. Currently, most commerce is located in Orange, Los Angeles, and parts of Riverside, and San Bernardino PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 4 Counties. Most of the affordable housing is located in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. Therefore, the migration of workers in the morning is westerly and vice versa in the afternoon. However, this industrial subdivision will make a positive contribution to air quality since the number of migrating workers will be reduced. However, to mitigate impacts on air quality each individual development will be required to development trip reduction plans including flexible work shifts and carpooling. Additionally, individual building designs should incorporate features which further reduce impacts on air quality, including provision automated teller machines, mass transit facilities and bicycle parking and employee showers and locker areas. Additional measures to improve air quality include energy conservation building techniques, and dust control measures during grading activities. These measures will be included in the Conditions of Approval. Noise Some noise impacts such as an increase in noise levels will result from the proposed development. These will be mitigated to a level of insignificance through the use landscape buffering and construction of block walls. Additionally, industrial uses are required to be conducted within an enclosed building which if necessary will be constructed with noise attenuating materials. Public Facilities and Infrastructure Schools Schools are impacted by industrial development. State law has set the maximum that can be charged for school impact mitigation for non-residential uses at $.26 per square foot. Currently, all new construction proposals will be required to pay fees in accordance with AB 2926. Public Buildings The proposal impacts other City services and public buildings as well. When combined with other development the project will impact library services, community services and city buildings. The current public building mitigation fee is $65.00 per acre. Water Water service will provided by Eastern Municipal Water District via a 14 inch line in Esplanade Avenue and an 8 inch line in Santa Fe Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 5 Sewer Sewer service is available to service the site in the form a 10 inch line in Santa Fe Avenue and a 10 inch line in Esplanade Avenue. However, extensions will be necessary and the development will subject to a sewer recapture fee. Biology The property is within the historic range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. The site is vacant with industrial and vacant areas adjacent to the site. Seismic Safety The subject property is not located within a known seismic zone. DISCUSSION The subject site is located in the central portion of San Jacinto, which in the vicinity of the site can best be characterized as predominantly industrial in nature. The site is currently vacant, basically flat, with no unique landform, flora, or fauna. Existing adjacent uses consist of industrial uses, multifamily residential uses and vacant land. However, immediately south of this site is R-3 zoning, which will require mitigation from potential adverse impacts associated with the industrial project. Potential impacts include noise and light and glare. Mitigation measures include landscape buffering and a 6 foot block wall. Additionally, individual projects will require either submission of a CUP or Staff Review application. Upon submittal, Staff will conduct the necessary environmental review and mitigate impacts as needed or required by Code. The request for industrial uses in the area is logical when considering the existing land use and development pattern of the area. The Hemet News facility is just west of the site and Edelbrock is just north of the site as are a variety of industrial users and properties. Furthermore, the function of Esplanade Avenue does not lend itself to residential use as it will be carrying large traffic volumes and be designated as a truck route. Access to the site will be provided from Esplanade Avenue and Santa Fe Avenue, with secondary access provided along the east property line via Street "A". Staff has concerns with potential sources of vehicle conflict on Esplanade Avenue and recommends consolidating driveway locations to the interior property lines. This would require reciprocal access agreements for individual implementing projects. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 6 The design of the parcel map proposes lot sizes ranging in area from 1.1 acres to 1.9 acres. This allows for a variety of development scenarios including smaller industrial users and consolidation of lots for larger industrial users. Furthermore, the parcel configuration allows for commercial use fronting on Esplanade Avenue with secondary access potential on Street "A". RECOMMENDATION Staff' recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution recommending to the City Council approval of GPA 4-91 subject to the Findings of Fact; adopt Resolution recommending to the City Council approval of CZ 9-91 subject to the Findings of Fact; and adopt Resolution approving TPM 27169 subject to the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval. Brian McNabb Director of Community Development PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 7 FINDINGS OF FACT GPA 4-91 1. There are main line utilities which serve the subject property at the present time, however, extensions will be required to service the site. 2. GPA 2-91 is not located within a known seismic zone. 3. GPA 2-91 is not located within a known "A" Flood Zone. 4. The subject site is within the habitat range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. 5. The General Plan Land Use Designation for the subject property is High Density Residential; the proposed General Plan Designation for the site is Light Industrial. The existing zoning for the site is R-3 (Multiple Family); the proposed zoning for the site is M-1 (Light Manufacturing). 6. Access to the site is available from Esplanade Avenue and Santa Fe Avenue. 7. The proposed General Plan Amendment is a prerequisite which facilitates the eventual industrial and commercial development of the subject property. 8. The proposed General Plan Amendment will create the potential for the following environmental impacts: [1] Local and Regional Drainage [2] Regional transportation construction and maintenance [3] Noise [4] Public Safety levels and Staffing [5] Local School Facilities However, mitigation will take the form of payment of impact fees and Conditions of Approval on the individual implementing projects such as Parcel Map 27169. 9. Traffic volumes will increase due the intensification of land uses. 10. The site is principally vacant, with manufacturing, industrial and high density residential uses interspersed throughout the area. 11. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 8 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, APPROVING AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE SAN JACINTO GENERAL PLAN FOR THE FIRST CYCLE OF 1992 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS; WHEREAS, Section 65631 of the Government Code provides that no mandatory element of a General Plan shall be amended more frequently than four time during any calendar year, and that the City Council of the City of San Jacinto is amending the Land Use Element of the San Jacinto General Plan for the first time during the 1992 calendar year; and WHEREAS, the City Council of San Jacinto held a public hearing on March 17, 1992 and made a determination that the Land Use Element of the San Jacinto General Plan should be amended as follows: A. Existing land use patterns will be enhanced by GPA 4-91 and being assigned as a specific plan area; as designated on Exhibit A. B. GPA 4-91 will enhance the logical development of the City. C. GPA 4-91 allow reasonable and proper use of property in the vicinity of the amendment. WHEREAS, advertisement for a public hearing on GPA 4-91 was published in accordance with Article 6, Chapter 3, Title 7, of the Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there will not be a significant impact upon the environment by right of this change and adopts a Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment 4-91 Therefore the land use element of the General Plan is amended in accordance with Exhibit A. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED the 17th day of March, 1992. A ITEST: Deputy City Clerk Mayor FINDINGS OF FACT CZ 9-91 1. There are main line utilities which serve the subject property at the present time, however, extensions will be required to service the site. 2. CZ 6-91 is not located within a known seismic zone. 3. CZ 6-91 is not located within a known "A" Flood Zone. 4. The subject site is within the habitat range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. 5. The General Plan land use designation for the subject property is High Density Residential; the proposed General Plan Designation for the site is Light Industrial. The existing zoning for the site is R-3 (Multiple Family); the proposed zoning for the site is M-1 (Light Manufacturing). 6. Access to the site is available from Esplanade Avenue and Santa Fe Avenue. 7. The proposed Change of Zone is a necessary entitlement to provide for the ultimate industrial and commercial development of the subject property. 8. The proposed Change of Zone will create the potential for the following environmental impacts: [1] Local and Regional Drainage [2] Regional transportation construction and maintenance [31 Noise [4] Public Safety levels and Staffing [5] Local School Facilities However, mitigation will take the form of payment of impact fees and Conditions of Approval on the individual implementing projects such as Parcel Map 27169. 9. The proposed Change of Zone will not create conditions that are detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 9 CERTIFICATE The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. duly passed by the said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein. Deputy City Clerk /I/JEc SLIT ` 4.P. N0, 40-070-010 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL 439.070-02Z C•3 ?IlY IF YANJAC/NIO . COUN1Y AoFJIVERILDE►_ St4IF iOF CILITIRN/A 435-21Z-035 M. 1 1000' ESPLANADE N09'54'37T 660,04' 419.170-.045 419.070-0Z 1 50' 700' I 499 439•i5•00! ,l•3 499' 419.N-001' 1-3 499'' LT 419•1N-Oil; RESOLUTION NO. EXHIBIT A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 4-91 0 zoo 2A ' 400 640 BOO ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 9-91 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby amended by adding thereto Change of Zone 9-91 as herein set forth. Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the City of San Jacinto shown on the attached map marked Exhibit "A" made a part hereof, is hereby established as M-1, Light Manufacturing. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 17th day of March 1992. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 1992 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Al IEST Mayor Deputy City Clerk —1— CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of 1992. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of 1992. City Clerk -2 - C/lY OF SAN JACINTO , COUN/Y OF METtIDEI SRN OF CAI/f/NNrA 43541Z-030 M• I i4' 3D' ESPLANADE 439470.045. 590' 439-170•aI l 141 N 09' 54'37'E 600.04' fR/Jfg SITE A.p NO. 4i!•07D -010 M-! LIGHT MANUFACTURING 89'53'52'E 060.00' 30' 439.070-02a K3 450' 437100.014 M-r 10D' 100' 100' 017 010 019 S 151 AVENUE I 499' 439•N4101 aI Q3_ a 30' 439-110.001 Ki 499' 439.le- 011 KF ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT A CHANGE OF ZONE 9-91 0 ZOO 2U0i 400 iA9 BOO SONO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 4-91 AND CHANGE OF ZONE 9-91 CDNAINIfEAUll AYE. MY Of SAN JIVIFID awri fr IfirERTIOE SIN IF &Mew MO BASE MAP CM OF SAN JAC/Xld , OWNIY OF 'K/YERS/dE1 SM1F dF CRLITIAW/A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 4-91 AND CHANGE OF ZONE 9-91 435-212.03d [VACANT" FSPIANADF ( N- N 09.070-043 NE HEM&7 NEWS OFFICE 390' war I 439.074-02 I � N 69' 54' 17'E 30' 30 660.04' -' fIJECT SITE A.P. H. 439-070-0113 V,ACHT N89'53'5Z f 460.011' 499•07d-022 VACANT 630' J 50' — 437-/ 0-016 /00 117 MO' JIB (00' 019 ERCIAL 8115/NESSES 1 E1RTR ICA1 'POPS • 700' AY 'GE I 499' 439.110-001 VACANT 4 9.1/0 001 PONT 499' 419410 M4d/1E lIME PRIX EXISTING USE MAP "=2AD' 600 CITY OF SAN JAd/ITD , CDUNIY Of RIVERS/DE RATE A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 4-91 AND CHANGE OF ZONE 9-91 435-i/2.3 lldNT /NDIISTR/AL JO' FJOUNAD f1!-070-D4 L16NT /NDUJIA/AL 390' IOW' NO9'S4'37E 50' — 640.04-' 'WIRT SITE A.P. NO. 439.070-D/e N/GN AE'YSIIT RESIDENTIAL 457•110-04 1L frNT /N 0' N7 011 00' 9' n ti U3TR/AL l 7DD AVENUE 1 499' 439.1tl•001 (NI ll DENSITY I AIDEN77AL 499' 439•110.001 HIGH DENSITY RESlDE7VIZAL 419-170-OfI I UGXT INDUSTRIAL N19'SJ"5I'E 660.0d' .439.470-022 IIW DENNS/7Y RESIDENTIAL 430' 30' - 30' 499' 419.11D- 0/I AfEP/UN, DEA'SITY AIDS/DP1'7/AL I EXISTING GENERAL PLAN 1 = 2Do' ZOO 400 ' 600 ellY OF SAN JACINM WRY Of RIYERSIDE:, SIATF OF CALITIRNIA GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 4-91 AND CHANGE OF ZONE 9-91 116IIT INDOSTRIAL "1.1.1am pt-tpO• 043 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL] 9 390' 459-470-02 I LIGIIT INDUSTRIAL fillECT SITE A.P. 4i9- 7 -013 gpfr N 89' 53'52"E ii•OOD' 4.39 -PO- 022 EMIT Y SETIDENTIAL.; 430$ 1 499 ; 439-10-401 • III/GII DENSITY REPENT/AL 499, 439- //a• 00 / MI/ Dam RESIDENTIAL 30' 30' 49'9' 4 i9, 110- Olt 4/011I14 DENNY RESIDENTIAL NO OP PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN 0 ZOO *00 600 Leff OF TAN JtJN21 CIJONIY R11E1570E, SaTEIDFr CALIFORNIA GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 4-91 AND CHANGE OF ZONE 9-91 455-2i2. 0313 41- I 1060' 30 ' — ESPLANADE 89' 54' ( 119 -170- 043 90' 660. 04' fillferi SITE A.Y. NO. 439070 -015 /t63 439.170-011 M-1 N39'53.5rE 660.0b' 459 -070- 022 ' L: t-3 630' 453.114-014 4,7 mir 017 100' 018 100' AVENUE I 499' 459 -110-04/ L-3 499' 439- 04-001 Z-3 • 499° 30' 459.110. 011, a stosir moo' " ••••••Nommomme mommo•••• EXISTING ZONING i "-Zoo' 200 400 600 BOO CITY OF SAN JACINTD , COUNTY OF KIYERS/DE1 STATF IF GENERAL PLAN AMENDEMENT AND CHANGE OF ZONE 9-91 415-212-030 MI 1000 ' 3a' — 34 LEJ W ESPLANADE r N 09' 54' 371" 439.070- 045 4.f 590' 440.0+' P,P/JECT SITE A.P. NO. 439 070-015 M-1 439-070-021 M-1 �N89'33'5Z'E b60.Od' 50' 439-070-022 4-1 R-3 650' 437 /DD-D/b M•f 100' 017 100 010 /0D' 019 - CALIFIdN/d 700' 4-91 I� 0 499' 439.110-001 £. 3 499' 439.110.00 / 499' _3D' 439.1tl-011 RF PROPOSED ZONING �y=2a0 0 ZOO 400 400 ANNE, .ION CITY If SAN JACINTO CDIN KIYEE1,0E, SWF IF CALIAMNI4 GENERAL PLAN AMENDEMENT 4-91 AND CHANGE OF ZONE 9-91 4i5-212.033 114I01?:ROADWAY .r1:1118', 10hp .30' 30' ESPLANADE N 49' 54' 37'E' 640. OAP ' 437 MO - OIL 100 ' 017 ID ' 418 100' 019 PA'!)EC7 'SITE, 419 -074- 443' A.V. NO. 439- 070 -015 90' 7401 AVENUE • 499' 479-10-401 499' 5 IVLIECTO,e- 6 439-110-041 4 419-570-at N 19' '527 kloDON 459 -470- 022 630' 35 ' 459. 0// a. pIRWLATION ELE = 2ex) 200 4 00 600 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development Via Pam S. Easter, City Manager SUBJ: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND CHANGE OF ZONE 10-91 DATE: March 12, 1992 APPLICANT: LOWELL D. ZEHNDER 206 15Th STREET Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714)536-1718 DESCRIPTION 3 -17 A request for a change of zone from C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) to C-2 (General Commercial) for a 3.1 acre triangular parcel (450'X700') located at the northwest corner of State Street and Be Anza Drive. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends the Council introduce the attached Ordinance approving Change of Zone 10-91 subject to Findings of Fact, and adopt a Negative Declaration. DISCUSSION December 11, 1991, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on the above zone change, no adverse testimony was received. The staff had recommended approval of the zone change. Attached for your information is a copy of the Staff Report to the Planning Commission. Respectfully Submitted, 1 - I • BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development Attachments: Staff Report Ordinance STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Ver Plank and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: December 4, 1991 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CHANGE OF ZONE 10-91 APPLICANT: LOWELL D. ZEHNDER 206 15th Street Huntington Beach, California 92648 (714) 536-1718 DESCRIPTION A request for a change of zone from C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) to C-2 (General Commercial) for a 3.1 acre triangular parcel (450'X 700') located at the northwest corner of State Street and De Anza Drive. BASE MAP- 1/2 MILE RADIUS EXHIBIT "A" EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT "B" EXISTING ZONING EXHIBIT "C" CURRENT USES EXHIBIT "D" EXISTING CIRCULATION EI FMENT EXHIBIT "E" PROPOSED ZONING EXHIBIT "F' FLOODZONE EXHIBIT "G" PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 11, 1991 PAGE! BACKGROUND This application was submitted to the Planning Department on October 9, 1991. The property in question is located V4 mile south of Basic Shelter's commercial center on State Street, south of Ramona Boulevard. The underlying reason for the applicant's change of zone request is develop the property on the same scale and be consistent with Basic Shelter's venture located at 480 N. State Street (PM 25869). This site is currently under construction with a 20,699 square foot multi -tenant retail building in the latter framing stages and a 3000 square foot restaurant in the planning stages. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The environmental review has identified the following potential impacts created by the proposal on public facilities and infrastructure within the City of San Jacinto. These impacts include: Local and Regional Drainage The subject site is not within a designated "A" flood zone per the Federal Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the City of San Jacinto. The entire property is located within Zone "X" (shaded), which is an area determined to be within the 500-year flood plain and subject to inundation levels of less than one foot during a 100-year flood. The applicant of any future development on the site will be required to construct, at some future date, paved access for internal circulation, widening of adjacent public rights of way, and a paved parking area. These improvements will result in increased amounts of impervious surfaces in the area and thereby exacerbate surface runoff levels from the project. This fact underscores the need for the potential project to address local and regional drainage concerns. Local drainage will convey storm water run off to a regional system through use of local streets, ditches, open channels, and storm drains which are not part of the regional master plan. Customarily, the entire cost of local drainage improvements will be borne entirely by the developer. On the other hand, Regional drainage is the cumulative impact of local storm run-off. Therefore, all local run-off must be conveyed in a manner consistent with the Regional Master Drainage Plan for the San Jacinto area. The future developer will be required to pay $5990 per acre for financing future construction of regional flood control facilities. Circulation The proposed Change of Zone will introduce a project that will have impacts on both local roadways and regional transportation construction/maintenance. The additional traffic impacts imposed on local roadways can be best measured by daily trip generation. PLANNING COMMISSION DECE flER 11, 1991 PAGE 2 According to data published by the California Department of Transportation, the gross traffic volume for a retail center on a parcel less ten acres is approximately 1000 trips per acre or about 3100 trips per day (3.1 acres X 1000 trips/acre). It is doubtful that any development related proposal will create any significant increase in automobile trip generation, when compared with traffic generation figures for C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) development. However, since this parcel is ostensibly vacant, additional traffic will be generated at this location. This increased traffic volume may create a need for additional signal controlled intersections, especially at those intersections in closest proximity to the proposed development (i.e. State Street and Ramona Boulevard and/or De Anza Drive). Also, the cumulative impacts of all future development may create a need for additional signals within the City's Central Business District and for those regional corridors which funnel into the project area, as well. The current and projected levels of traffic generated by this proposed commercial use, when combined with Maclin's open air market and Basic Shelter's 20,699 square foot retail center at 480 N. State Street, will in all likelihood warrant the installation of a traffic signal at one or more of the aforementioned intersections. The current traffic signal mitigation fee is $2700 per acre of commercial property. These fees will be exacted from the project proponent at some mutually agreed upon date in the future, based on the immediate needs of the City. In general, future traffic signals are installed when warranted by traffic demands. Also, a traffic study will be required prior to the development of the property. The two regional corridors which traverse San Jacinto include Ramona Expressway and Sanderson Avenue. Their regional character is derived from the fact that both roadways are part of a transportation network which serves destinations outside the San Jacinto Valley area. Presently, neither roadway is constructed to its ultimate right-of-way and existing pavement sections are in need of repair. An equitable cost sharing arrangement could be based on the assumption that all new development will impact regional transportation corridors, not exclusively those developments which are contiguous to the major roadways. The present value of funding levels required to finance new construction is estimated to be approximately $5 million and an additional $1 million for required maintenance. The pro- rata cost for regional road improvements and maintenance is currently $820.00 per acre or $2542 for the entire project area. The anticipated traffic volume from the proposed development related to this Change of Zone to C-2 (General Commercial) will also impact the existing local street system within San Jacinto in two ways: (1) a breakdown of existing pavement sections due to increased traffic; and (2) additional lane miles requiring maintenance. NG COMMISSION DECEMBER 11, 1991 PAGE 3 Traditionally, funding for road maintenance and new construction are derived from the same sources, namely gasoline and property taxes; presently, these sources are inadequate to fund the current level of road maintenance required. Estimated maintenance costs or local roadways will total $5 million over the next ten years. However, outside revenue sources will provide only $1 5 million (30%) during the same period. The pro-rata cost of local road improvements and maintenance will is currently $500.00 per acre or $1550 for the entire project area. Noise Any future commercial center will generate intrusive noise from the volume of traffic generated and the commercial activity conducted on -site. It is important to remember that all uses within the C-2 (General Commercial) Zone are conducted within a fully enclosed building. Therefore alternative measures must be implemented to retain the traffic noise within the confines of the site and prevent any impact on those residential properties located to the southwest. These noise mitigation measures will prevent future complaints from those existing and planned residential uses located along De Anza. Mitigation measures may include the construction of sound walls, earthen berms, landscaping, or some combination thereof. Public Facilities & Infrastructure Sewer Sanitary sewer service will be provided by the City of San Jacinto. However, the closest existing lines are located at De Anza/ Portero Street and 600' south of State Street/Ramona Boulevard. Therefore, the applicant will be required to extend one of these lines to service the development. Also, a 12" line is located in De Anza Drive, east of State Street; a possibility exists that the applicant could extend this line and recapture a portion of the cost from Reed Grain & Milling Co.-- the developers of Tract 26780 @ SW corner of De Anza and State Street. Water Domestic water service will be provided by the City of San Jacinto. Presently, a 6" line is located in De Anza Drive, but it is doubtful that this size line will provide adequate pressure for fire flows and potable water. Biology The property is within the range of Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. However, since the entire acreage has at one time been cultivated and subsequently used for residential/agricultural purposes, it is unlikely to serve as suitable habitat. A biology report will not be required prior to the issuance of any grading permits. PLANNING COMMISSION DELL 11 ER 11, 1991 PAGE 4 DISCUSSION The focus of this discussion will be to evaluate whether the proposed Change of Zone is appropriate for this location. As previously mentioned in the "Background" section, the area along the west side of State Street, just south of Ramona Boulevard has been the center of recent commercial construction activity. Also, the Land Use Element of the General Plan has designated State Street as a "Community Commercial" corridor from north of the Ramona Expressway to south of Cottonwood Avenue. According to the General Plan, "Community Commercial" land uses are designed to provide for a broad range of retail and service commercial activities at varying levels of intensity. The major determinants in applying either a C-1 or C-2 zoning designation to a particular parcel within a "Community Commercial" land use designation are: (1) Compatibility with existing and proposed land uses within the vicinity; and (2) Capability of the circulation system to accommodate the proposed levels of commercial intensity. With regard to land use compatibility, this vacant parcel is substantially surrounded by vacant C-2 zoned parcels to the northwest, northeast, south, and southeast. Also, there is a 13 lot R-2 (Two -Family Residential) subdivision located to the southeast of this project (Tentative Tract 26780). However, the properties located directly to the west of the proposal are zoned C-1 and are currently being used for duplexes and a church/preschool. In effect, the proposed change of zone would promote the policies and objectives of the Land Use Element of the General Plan and be compatible with established land use patterns in the area. Further, as previously mentioned in the "Circulation" section of the Environmental Analysis, State Street has been designated as a "Major Highway" (110' ROW) and De Anza is a "Secondary Highway" (88' ROW) per the Circulation Element of the General Plan. A "Major Highway" typical cross section is a four -lane divided highway with a center median -- the ultimate capacity is 30,000 vehicles per day. The typical cross section for a "Secondary Highway" is a four -lane undivided highway, with a capacity of 20,000-24,000 vehicles per day. Both of these thoroughfares have the capability and capacity to accommodate the anticipated traffic volumes at acceptable levels of service. The C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) District provides for general retail, service, and office uses designed to serve the immediate daily needs of the surrounding residential development. On the other hand, the purpose and intent of the C-2 (General Commercial) District is to function as a central shopping area designed to serve the entire City. The C-2 District will allow those uses first permitted in the C-1 Zone, the more intensive repair operations (vehicles and major appliances), and tourist serving commercial. The existing and planned development patterns along this portion of State Street reflect a "community" scale, PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 11, 1991 PAGE 5 and this proposed Change of Zone would be both consistent and complementary. It is important to mention that the applicant will be submitting a development plan for the property at a later date. Any application will be required to undergo "Staff Review" wherein compliance with the site development standards for the C-2 District will be verified and conditions of approval will also be applied, thereby incorporating any mitigation measures pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff feels that by allowing the property to be developed per the C-2 District standards, that the applicant will be able to establish unified development on a scale with those project currently under construction. Examples of unified development include the use of reciprocal access easements, limiting driveway access on State Street, using corresponding streetscape and landscape themes, and promoting complementary architectural motifs. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution 91-47 recommending the City Council approve Change of Zone 10-91 subject to Findings of Fact and Grant a Negative Declaration with mitigating measures. Brian McNabb Director of Community Development PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 11, 1991 PAGE 6 FINDINGS OF FACT CZ 10-91 1. No known special seismic study area is located within CZ 10-91. 2. CZ 10-91 is not within an "A" Flood zone. 3. Utilities are available to service the subject site. 4. The property is within the range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. 5. The subject property is currently vacant with dilapidated buildings on -site. The surrounding land uses are vacant, commercial, and residential. 6. State Street has been desiyi ated as a 100' Major Highway, and De Anza Drive will function as an 88' Secondary Highway. 7. The property is presently zoned as C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial); the Land Use Element of the General Plan designates this area as Community Commercial. 8. The proposed Change of Zone will not create any conditions that will be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 9. The proposed C-2 Change of Zone is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan. ISao' TOO' EXHIBIT "A" CHANGE OF ZONE 10-91 BASE MAP- ,,i MILE x;:DIUS TRACT NUMBERS SHOWN .■SIM11 4,4111101111111111111111 ,fir ; �i a MIN -"a o_ .. '�► Vain ovim Aram • mwrin ismit TR- ;�;. WOOD'"" -AYE 150O' 500' A%i /IfiAmoznit ei ►rz% o PIN �' SA N SACINIO H!G!I 5JHC)OL HIBIT "B" CHANGE OF ZONE 10-91 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN- MILE HraH ScHoo $# COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL III LOW DENSITY RESID AL /// LIGHT INDUSTRIAL = MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENT SVCAMoq[ C'MP PP LN ICT I soo' 500' EXHIBIT "C" CHANGE OF ZONE 10-91 EXISTING ZONING- 1h MILE `- DIUS 500' 500 EXHIBIT "D" CHANGE OF ZONE 10-91 EXISTING USES- MILE RADIUS I S0 0' 500' EXHIBIT "E" CHANGE OF ZONE 10-91 EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT 500' EXHIBIT "F" CHANGE OF ZONE 10-91 PROPOSED ZONING ZONE X +97 COTTONWOOD ZONEX ZONE X 0 z CORPORATE PEACH ET- flT ZOM ' STREET MEAD STREET ISTREET OAKHURST OR AL.ESSANDi CRYSTAL ORI AVENUE HIBIT "G' CHANGE OF ZONE 10-9 FLOODZONE ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 10-91 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby amended by adding thereto Change of Zone 10-91 as herein set forth. Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the City of San Jacinto shown on the attached map marked Exhibit "A" made a part hereof, is hereby established as C-2, General Commercial. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 17th day of March 1992. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 1992 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Al I EST Mayor Deputy City Clerk —1— CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of 1992. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of 1992. City Clerk -2 - "1-TilDA 3 - 4 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development Via Pam S. Easter, City Manager SUBJ: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND CHANGE OF ZONE 3-92 DATE: March 12, 1992 APPLICANT: "MA" WILLIAMS MOBILE HOME SALES 6750 W. FLORIDA AVENUE Hemet, Ca. 92544 (714)926-1581 DESCRIPTION A request for a change of zone from C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) to C-2 (General Commercial) for a 2.23 acre triangular parcel located at the southeast corner of State Street and De Anza Drive. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends the Council introduce the attached Ordinance, approving Change of Zone 3-92, subject to Findings of Fact and adopt a Negative Declaration. DISCUSSION On March 11, 1992, the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on the subject case. Prior to the meeting, the Planning Commission received four letters in opposition to the request. Jeff Divine, one of the correspondents was the only person to testify, expressing concern with previous failures to adhere to conditions of approval by the applicant. Page No. 2 Change of Zone 3-92 March 17, 1992 Staff had recommended approval of the zone change due to its frontage on State Street and consistency with other zoning in the area. The site does not fulfill the intention of the C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) zone, which is to provide commercial support to a localized area. Respectfully Submitted, BRIAN MC NABB Director of Community Development Attachments: Staff Report Ordinance STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Ver Plank and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DArE: March 11, 1992 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CHANGE OF ZONE 3-92 APPLICANT: "MA" 'WILLIAMS MOBILF HOME SALES 6750 W. FLORIDA AVENUE HEMET, CALIFORNIA (714) 926-1581 DESCRIPTION A request for a change of zone from C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) to C-2 (General Commercial) for a 2.23 acre triangular parcel located at the southeast corner of State Street and De Anza Drive. BASE MAP- 1/2 MILE RADIUS EXHIBIT "A" EXISTING GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT "B" EXISTING ZONING EXHIBIT "C" CURRENT USES EXHIBIT "D" EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT EXHIBIT "E" PROPOSED ZONING EXHIBIT "F" FLOODZONE EXHIBIT "G" AREA MAP EXHIBIT "H" PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 11, 1992 PAGE 1 BACKGROUND This application was submitted to the Planning Department on February 6, 1992. The subject site is currently partially developed with an existing mobile home sales facility. Mobile home sales were first permitted on -site pursuant to Conditional Use Permit 3-73 (Lehman). The current use was permitted pursuant to Conditional Use Permit 4-78 (Williams). However, at this time the existing zoning of C-1 does not permit establishment or expansion of mobile home sales lots. Therefore, though the use is considered a legal use, a change of zone request is necessary as the owner wishes to expand the operation. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The environmental review has identified the following potential impacts created by the proposal on public facilities and infrastructure within the City of San Jacinto. These impacts include: Local and Regional Drainage The subject site is not within a designated "A" flood zone per the Federal Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the City of San Jacinto. The entire property is located within Zone "X" (shaded), which is an area determined to be within the 500-year flood plain and subject to inundation levels of less than one foot during a 100-year flood. The future expansion of the •use on the site will require additional paving for internal circulation and parking, and widening of adjacent streets. These improvements will increase impervious surfaces in the area and minimally increase surface run-off. This fact underscores the need for the potential project to address local and regional drainage concerns. Local drainage will convey storm water run-off to a regional system through use of local streets and storm drains which are not part of the regional master plan. Customarily, the entire cost of local drainage improvements will be borne entirely by the developer. Conversely, Regional drainage is the cumulative impact of local storm run-off. All local run-off must be conveyed in a manner consistent with the Regional Master Drainage Plan for the San Jacinto area. The future development may be required to participate in the financing of future regional flood control facilities. Circulation The proposed Change of Zone will allow for an increase in the intensity of development on - site that will generate impacts on both local roadways and regional transportation construction/maintenance. The additional traffic impacts can best be measured by daily trip generation. Though the site is proposed to be zoned C-2, the site is partially developed with a mobile home sales lot proposed to be expanded. Moreover, the trip generation rates for a mobile home sales lot would be much less than general retail. PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 11, 1992 PAGE 2 Therefore, to determine the appropriate vehicle trips for the site, Staff utilized traffic generation figures for industrial uses as published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The appropriate trip generation factor is 60 vehicle trips per acre per day, generating approximately 134 vehicle trips per day for the site. However, the cumulative impacts of all future development may create a need for additional signals within the City. The current and projected levels of traffic generated by this project, when combined with other developments and uses in the area such as Maclin's open air market and Basic Shelter's 20,699 square foot retail center at 480 N. State Street, will in all likelihood warrant the installation of a traffic signal at one or more of the intersections in the vicinity of the site. The current traffic signal mitigation fee is $2700 per acre of commercial property. These fees will be exacted from the project proponent at some mutually agreed upon date in the future, based on the immediate needs of the City. In general, future traffic signals are installed when warranted by traffic demands. Traditionally, funding for road maintenance and new construction are derived from the same sources, namely gasoline and property taxes; presently, these sources are inadequate to fund the current level of road maintenance required. Estimated maintenance costs or local roadways will total $5 million over the next ten years. However, outside revenue sources will provide only $1.5 million (30%) during the same period. The pro-rata cost of local road improvements and maintenance will is currently $500.00 per acre or $1115 for the entire project area. Noise Any expansion of the use will generate additional noise from traffic generated on -site and the commercial activity conducted on -site. Therefore, alternative measures must be implemented to retain the traffic noise within the confines of the site and prevent any impact on those residential properties located to the east. These noise mitigation measures will prevent future complaints from those existing and planned residential uses located along De Anza. Mitigation measures may include the construction of sound walls, earthen berms, landscaping, or some combination thereof. Public Facilities & Infrastructure Sewer Sanitary sewer service is currently being provided by the City of San Jacinto. A 12" line is located in De Anza Drive, east of State Street, and is capable of accommodating the expansion of the use on -site. PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 11, 1992 PAGE 3 Water Domestic water service is currently being provided by the City of San Jacinto. A 6" line is located in De Anza Drive and is capable a accommodating the expansion of the use on -site. However, it is doubtful that this size line will provide adequate pressure for fire flows and potable water for a change to a more intense use on -site or for additional development in the vicinity of the site. Biology The property is within the range of Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. However, since the site and the surrounding acreage is developed there is no chance of on -site habitat. A biology report will not be required prior to the issuance of any grading permits. DISCUSSION The focus of this discussion will be to evaluate whether the proposed Change of Zone is logical and appropriate for this location. The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the site as "Community Commercial". Additionally, the State Street corridor is designated as "Community Commercial" from north of the Ramona Expressway to south of Cottonwood Avenue. According to the General Plan, "Community Commercial" land uses are designed to provide for a broad range of retail and service commercial activities at varying levels of intensity. The major determinants in applying either a C-1 or C-2 zoning designation to a particular parcel within a "Community Commercial" land use designation are: (1) Compatibility with existing and proposed land uses within the vicinity; and (2) Capability of the circulation system to accommodate the proposed levels of commercial intensity. With regard to land use compatibility, this parcel is substantially surrounded by C-2 zoned parcels to the west and northwest. Additionally, the Planning Commission recently approved a similar change of zone request from C-1 to C-2 on the northwest corner of State Street and De Anza. However, immediately east of the site there are existing well maintained single family homes zoned R-1 (Single Family Residential). The existing use and its expansion would not be expected to further impact those residential uses. However, there is the potential for a more intense use to occur on -site in the future. The C-2 zone development standards require measures to ensure compatibility and limit impacts on surrounding properties to a level of insignificance. Measures include provision of a 6 foot block wall at the property line between the distinct uses, 15 foot landscaped setback and requiring any sales and office uses to be conducted within an enclosed building. PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 11, 1992 PAGE 4 Further, as previously mentioned in the "Circulation" section of the Environmental Analysis, State Street has been designated as a "Major Highway" (110' ROW) and De Anza is a 'Secondary Highway(88' ROW) per the Circulation Element of the General Plan. A "Major Highway" typical cross section is a four -lane divided highway with a center median -- the ultimate capacity is 30,000 vehicles per day. The typical cross section for a "Secondary Highway" is a four -lane undivided highway, with a capacity of 20,000-24,000 vehicles per day. Both of these thoroughfares have the capability and capacity to accommodate the anticipated traffic volumes at acceptable levels of service. The C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) District provides for general retail, service, and office uses designed to serve the immediate daily needs of the surrounding residential development. On the other hand, the purpose and intent of the C-2 (General Commercial) District is to function as a central shopping area designed to serve the entire City. The C-2 District will allow those uses first permitted in the C-1 Zone, the more intensive repair operations (vehicles and major appliances), and tourist serving commercial. The existing and planned development patterns along this portion of State Street reflect a "community" scale, and this proposed Change of Zone would be both consistent and complementary. Additionally, it is important to mention that upon approval of the change of zone the use on -site will become conforming. Additionally, upon the request for expansion of the use on - site applicant will be submitting a development plan for the property at a later date. The application will be required to undergo "Staff Review" wherein compliance with the site development standards for the C-2 District will be verified and conditions of approval will also be applied, thereby incorporating any mitigation measures pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Staff feels that by allowing the property to be developed per the C-2 District standards, the applicant will be able to establish unified development on the site, including using corresponding streetscape and landscape themes, and promoting complementary architectural motifs for any structures on -site. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution 92-10 recommending the City Council approve Change of Zone 3-92 subject to Findings of Fact and Grant a Negative Declaration with mitigating measures. Brian McNabb Director of Community Development PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 11, 1992 PAGE 5 FINDINGS OF FACT CZ 3-92 1. No known special seismic study area is located within CZ 3-92. 2. CZ 3-92 is not within an "A" Flood zone. 3. Utilities are available and are servicing the subject site. 4. The property is within the range of the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat, but is currently developed restricting the possibility of K-Rat on -site. 5. The subject property is currently developed and being used for mobile home sales. The surrounding land uses include vacant commercial property and single family residential homes. Upon application for expansion of the use on -site, mitigation of potential impacts upon surrounding properties will be required. 6. State Street has been designated as a 100' Major Highway, and De Anza Drive will function as an 88' Secondary Highway. 7. The property is presently zoned as C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial); the Land Use Element of the General Plan designates this area as Community Commercial. 8. The proposed Change of Zone will not create any conditions that will be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 9. The proposed C-2 Change of Zone is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 11, 1992 PAGE 6 ?,_ 5 '35-12 -2% z o/ /4400 } c0 'Aar sa lAIZJ /a. // o<o Am ei-4, e MEM TAMS WIER MIN CETI m /aa232 T C. A. 100/ /003 EXHIBIT " A BASE _MAP ZONE CHANGE " 3-92 " / (SOUTH CENTRAL AVE.)£ Car. Com 140m OR/VC m ��� ✓as 's a•srle P©R. SECS. 278 34, T, 45, R. /W MB. 4/225 SD T J. Brin/on's Subdivision of Form Lots /409 /55 M.B.8/35750 Son Jacinto Land Association MB 9/41OSO Estudillo Land 9 Water Company's Addition to Son J. PM. 6/55 Parcel Mop 4.913 PM 44/ 20 Parcel Map ///45 PM 46/5 Parcel Map /1/ 46 PM 100/30 - /. /70/4 DA rA1R/512/25, 48/95, 52/2, 49/70 Co. RA. 97-V, 782 - 9 ®- aana Ca. Sur 94.6 /? 8 8/29258 See . Fi/s } 4 Par 2� P rrr S 411 P. SM. \0.144e.+^ o.raae. /8aw R01.8/1100 As 8 /e®r >e )e• ar s Pq 4442,0 sm.,w rm.40P 44/4-'0w-1 1.100 /S, 0. z2Ach7. 4j drol geaa^ COrCAST 1 ASSESSOR'S MAP BA", 435 PG. /2 RIVERSIDE CPU/NTT; CALIF ae > EXHIBIT __ _GENERAL PLAN_ _- ZONE CHANGE " 3 9z .� B " j.EGENP 1. LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 13.1 - 6.0 du/ac) 2. MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (6.1 - 15.0 du/acl COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC/INSTUTUTIONAL (PARKS, SCHOOLS, PUBLIC FACILITIES) 1SY CAUORE nil LN 9IRCH LN iai EXHIBIT " c " _ EXISTING ZONI tl II ZONE CHANGE " 3-9z s� a ZONING MAP ORDINANCE 1340 R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R-2 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R-3 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R-T RESIDENTIAL TRAILER D-R DOWNTOWN RESIDENTIAL R-P RESIDENTIAL PROFESSIONAL C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL C-M HEAVY COMMERCIAL LIMITED INDUSTRIAL M-I LIGHT MANUFACTURING M-I-P INDUSTRIAL PARK PLIo TRERO—ST �Sr CA YORE CA OR y Il�i� 'e-p"I 'SF JLN it CT, SFR vas SFR CLOV-'.: ST'w�a 'r 91RCH LR _\ I' ® IFID a SEV ENT ARK K :ra. H Grl as SC.aOoc- W D EXHIBIT " EXISTING USES ZONE CHANGE 3-92 " L L7[ HOFF- HnN PNRK O 1A_ ,a LEGEND SFR - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MFR - MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COM - COMMERCIAL IND - INDUSTRIAL VAC - VACANT GRAPHIC SCALE N FEt I O : •10� 5©©I IF5O0' ilOoo TR RO—ST CAM DOR CT. FIG-ST SEVENTH' • - I < . • . IPeo SIXTH EXHIBIT " E XIST CIRCULATION ELEMENT ZONE CHANGE " 3-92 .1 1 I VoR. IS rm. 1-7-JoN < Ig4 HI o A 1.1 PAX X II sod TRERO—ST MANTANiTA OR- KORN :EfiCII: • IsycAuoREI CAWHOR .TC-1 iz D LH A ' . 1 . 'I CLOY ST : -Ile. IRCH LN i 'I:: c° FIG" T -1, a l 49 1 U Si (il 1'1' I - P a x a r:INDUSTRIAL 4 7 ... WA" S EVENT FIFTH 1411 EXHIRT:i " F " PROPOSD ZONING- - I ZONE CHANGE " 392 to I tt I 1 I_ 1 1 1 iTtori i , t 1 lilt > .4. a. I T LJ a FF- /4 na Mg/4 E GRAPHIC SCALE IN I-tt Q. ' ' 10001 " 0 500' VP, 0 01 EXHIBIT " G " FLOODZONE......- ZONE CHANGE "±:92_" GRAPI-IC SCALE IN Emil 0 100o1 4/2:0601 60o1 ioo' • M 'V J 41,24'41( • ST TR. RO—ST sycsmoREI DLN iSIRCH LH T •tos' 4, ' M AN TANI TA OR-4 HOR CT. CLOY ST v.; oEIP1;! rINDUSTRIAL •4 •A4 eq.( SEVENTH of„.. < 4 • L, ' r.ITD C?'3 0 • 4411111‘ ti :Iv I hLLE / 441SSC " hhh. FIRFR'Jt ST. I r N ,t, I i IT.00 \I ;:. 1 ' 0 0010.4ity 4416\1116.\ Sn TH MAI FIF II L EkE SIXTH Ant Ia rg- M P4 EXHIBIT " H " AREA MAP_ ZONE CHANGE GRAPFIC SCALE IN FF.t 0 ! y 1000' .4 - o beD1 5001 150o' ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 3-92 AMENDING ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 340 is hereby amended by adding thereto Change of Zone 3-92 as herein set forth. Section 2. That the zoning of the property in the City of San Jacinto shown on the attached map marked Exhibit "A" made a part hereof, is hereby established as C-2, General Commercial. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 17th day of March 1992. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of 1992 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST Mayor Deputy City Clerk CERTIFICATE STATE: OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of 1992. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of 1992. City Clerk MR.& MRS. ALAN W. WOOLF 645 DE ANZA DRIVE SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA 92r83 /??z. • - MAR 1 0 1 ommunity Development e-dee. REAL ESTATE 142 E. Main St. San 9acinto, Calif. 92383 'f44 efe'e e a( 421Al 4 adz &id •ttieze a,3sAii4(2' derild F.- et ir'?0 4; n4;44 e ,e;a 47e 0144.4€44. //6. fteurif (44rf 4f 144CAIN/ 1, 4„1 44,0/ 41.44,0( ,4/*76 y4-4- 414 /44,-2e JJ ,at,elt,„ 7444 --,714-ort f14: „,...i. .,,,,, , / b 4e721„,-,tie/iii,t, vt cr- ,g. cud A- dute46401/ ..,- .. 7 ,ie tL 46, .„--,i4a /al. 41 ,47 I March 6, 1992 San Jacinto City Planning Cdmmission 201 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 Dear Sirs: I have just recently received a "Notice of Public Hearing" possible zone change for "Ma Williams Mobile Home Sales". on a A similar request to change the zoning from C-1 Neighborhood Carrnercial to a C-2 General Carrnercial was made some time ago when my husband was alive and I know he attended a mooting and was very much opposed to it. I am opposing it now and I think it would be detrimental to our residential area. My home is at 610 DeAnza Drive, San Jacinto. Sincerely, z March 6, 1992 San Jacinto City Planning Commission 201 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 Dear Sirs: I just recently received a "Notice of Public Hearing" regarding "Ma Williams Mobile Home Sales" asking for a change of zoning to C-2, Heavy COmmercial. I remember scrnething regarding this came up some years ago when my late husband was Mayor of San Jacinto and we were not in favor of it then and I am not in favor of it now. My residence is located at 630 DeAnza Drive and I am sure it would be detrimental to our nice residential area. Sincerely, TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DAI : March 17, 1992 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONCEPTUAL SPECIFIC PLAN 1-85 (AMENDMENT #1) STAFF REPORT A DA t.a 3•$? ¢4a- APPLICANT: RICE DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: ADJACENT TO SOBOBA ROAD, NORTH AND SOUTH OF LAKE PARK DRIVE DESCRIPTION A proposal to amend the previously approved Conceptual Specific Plan to eliminate a fire station site previously indicated for Village II and to change the land use plan for Villages II, III, V and VI. The site encompasses a total of 400 acres, and as amended would result in a build -out of 876 dwellings, or 788 dwellings and a 200 room hotel (Village V). RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council Adopt Resolution No. approving Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85, Amendment 1, subject to the Findings of Fact Conditions of Approval and determine that Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85 is consistent the previously certified Environmental Impact Report originally prepared for the projec BACKGROUND A project on the site was originally approved by the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors in 1981 to allow for 857 dwellings. The site was subsequently annexed to the City in 1985, and a new Specific Plan was approved for to allow for upwards of 1490 dwellings. The Specific Plan approved for the City included the six Village concept currently proposed, but contemplated a higher density development per Village. The current Specific Plan allows for primarily attached and townhouse type developments, with Village II the only area proposed for standard single family development. 5. Prior to occupancy of the 125th dwelling related to Village II, Dedicate the 3.6 acre fully improvedyark site o1iwy1140. Improvements shall include trees, grass, irrigation, 014 ball diamond, restroomr—and picnic facilities and 01.4yitoLl (4440. Dedication of the improved open space areas of Villages III and VI is to occur simultaneously with the first phases of construction. Improvements to the areas shall include landscaping, irrigation and picnic facilities. My704.4credit shall be given to the developer for the dedication and improvements of any the open space which may, after analyzing the cost of the improvements, satisfy the required park • • 7. The following are established Mitigation Measures from the Certified EIR and shall be satisfied: A. Facilities t let #3 lice patrol car and three officers "Cdfitriti.triA, D. Energy efficient building designs and placement shall be required, including passive -heating and cooling systems and construction in accordance with Title 24. 9. Provide a fifteen foot landscape median with automatic water sensor sprinkling system on Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive. 10. Reconstruct Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive to the center line if necessary. Construct a City Standard eight inch curb and gutter and where feasible, a meandering five foot sidewalk. A Class II bikeway shall also be provided Ok, „..„: R 4N & TUCKER 3oi4tJ:9 B1v0 nL64004C P a6bt N•91." W!L_IAM M, MAR•ICO96NA v 4 d I, A.44( Y00601 .t• 44 u4I.404 LANrIA4 s CO ,• s RCL _Li1N _ CAILAN +N ] .t_4 JT _- 4'GCAe6 ' n(MVIR v.9_: _ :AN.Gr .. CtI,Ot'I '0M16 n. C.YL F.!Lul O. ABMN 1430id .:AC?. .G L .CCL C. AUAC94C90 a_] 3 404..394O'• ]TSVCS 1. N!CnO.S P 01.•B 1RCM1S L. OR0CR4b?ON 4{.4LMAN[ vi WINOt4 Alt : 90,4t,+ 14010 4, IY:CRII 0A.61Q ::A A 0a4SLC' Ran OOI. n 9A601'431 6111666.0. at • MAC! 1. ORCCN `uA9 t tahiN4C01 AMIL10 M IPINC1 Itr W. c 0190•0 AROMAS J. CRA.d 0 C NsPIL,' .16.n L.. ec.0w6 ul ••cob C. •9ILOLN' YARP 0 r.ldat9 :RAM. A Ru4!I, RA91N T. 0100160 O. MIVIN' H KAT146..NC .46410, ',AFT M :0e91.1K.1• Ou4e r VJANLCYI9T IV., 0 CAR*LfH 91311413 9 MaNT9t10C0 ,N rvALCO'•" .061 639699 ]MI'.+ 1[33 1,. 033000 040004 W. 4:ATIO, Ill ATTORNEYS AT LAW A PARTNLRSHIP INCIU91N0 PR0[6g$10NA6 CORPO0A4I0N5 SANK OF THE WEST, SUITE !400 ell ANTON SOJLEVAR7 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA SEBEfl•IB018 CIRCO? ALL MAIL TO: P. 0. 110X 10SO 09TA MESA. OA'_IFORNIA Ba888-1980 TCLLPHaNE (7141 841.S100 12131 Sae-79E16 T4L,t COPIER 17141 640.902O City Council City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92383 A w. RVT*N I,AAC•mrll JAnLB 9 !34*CT, 9•. 066616601 Y I'.4OR0 W, B9RI SR, II614-19841 9. P06466 MOWCLL 6968i0431 March 17, 1992 L 4,tAtdfH L MANNA OAVIO N 3.0C1,300 .CDR 0 PIN2044 pA411 CMITR PL•KN : 1MC1 P PIN[R1T Aw4*, POnllry cgs's.AH 0Av10 0, C00000v[ 4 4, 0, 1r010P60N JA.AO 100400 RACER nANO V LICTLN ✓ 1TTRLW 1% 4000 ST61301(N A. 61.L.i JCL[Pt, WtRTNtlnca WIC4ACL O. TVON00 90B6RT 0 DWLN L OAM N VO 4464• JLSSPCT A. ODLDSAPC 41Nr000 ARAIL C ntv1H 011131E LAPVC 1. MCLi0P L. SAl 3449,0031 4TCTCH w. 9R0606C0 4i9AM :. 1NLC4[ 0AN BLA'tR PAMt6,3 J. ROOL*T0 JAArt0 4. w[l02 ul[S P P04811 ..001 L, OCMML[R 4TCWART 4RCBCYAH .ATR!CR b, McCALL:c 0,C0ARO 0Ow CLL ! ... RAT0,O0 M.COL 9UCA., A. v*<4R, 1L ON6n R A10,41 Our. AHN C1914OCLL [_.CN C. 1A4I4P0t1 00464t C NCNRC PRANx w. a*1.+AI69 4P4.416 C. •C:AN ,AVCN 'A te3200114 M CLI40 0. 3AHT MARµ A. '1.O41100t. JAMti 0 EAT '[YBIC L Ru[.YH[NLNZ IAVL J sicv[R] KARlN LT[R1 ▪ NP G9!LL,O7 {ARCH 4..Rad ryA▪ AVINA r nA!M6V •A 4POLC9t'DNM CORPORATION •MAlslW10 !rr NC« .1R. 440 WAS00,4074. Oe BHLT 0.V10.1 OARI®ALOI. 'I! 0. COYNea. ?fie: Soboba Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85 Amendment #1 Tentative Tract Map 24217 Amendment #1 Dear Honorable Members of the City Council: our firm has been retained by the owners of the Soboba Springs Mobile Home Park which is surrounded by the above referenced Tentative Tract Map. our clients are greatly concerned that the amendments to the Conceptual Plan and the Tract Map will create a significant adverse impact upon the Soboba Springs Mobile Home Park and its residents. While the developer of the adjacent property did agree to provide an additional eight foot setback along the border of his property adjacent to the Mobile Home Park and has agreed to limit the homes along the same boundary to single story homes, several important concerns remain unaddressed. No provision has been made for the landscaping and maintenance of the set back area. The developer has made reference to dedicating this area to us to improve and maintain. This is totally unacceptable. The sole need for this buffer is created by his project. Why should the residents of the mobile home park bear this expense? The residents of the Mobile Home Park already pay significant funds to the City as a landscaping and lighting assessment from Which they receive little benefit, since the streets and open space improvements within the Mobile Home Park are already private and are maintained at their expense. If the RUTAN & TUCKER ATIQ!NEYs Al ::AW S. a...nc....P i.twm.a ,.kola Non*L CS.P0.A80u6 City Council March 17, 1992 ?age 2 developer will not be required to maintain this area, at the very least the property should be conveyed to the City and landscaped and maintained by the City's Landscaping and Lighting District. A fundamental value of the Mobile Home Park to its residents is the mountain views they currently enjoy. The pad elevations required to provide drainage within the developers project will virtually eliminate this value. What will be created is a situation where front yards will be facing backyard fencing across our 32' wide private streets. No other project has been planned in the City which creates this situation. The City typically requires special landscaping treatments and decorative walls to avoid these kinds of impacts. The Mobile Home Park should be treated no differently. While the requirement that homes along the border of his project be limited to a single story helps to mitigate this impact, a reasonable compromise should also include the creation of view corridors along the boundaries of the Mobile Home Park. our client's have suggested that this could be adequately accomplished with the elimination of only four lots. The loss of these lots would be insignificant and could probably be made up on the other adjacent projects of the developer where, contrary to this project, densities have been significantly reduced in the amended Conceptual Plan. Our review of the project files leads us to conclude that the environmental documentation for the project is flawed and is subject to judicial challenge. We have outlined our concerns with the environmental documentation below in order to comply with the requirement of Public Resources Code Section 21177 so as to preserve our clients right to challenge the project should it become necessary to do so. Our evaluation of the environmental documentation indicates that it is not in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21050 et seq.). The fundamental EIR which 'is being utilized as the basic environmental document RUTAN & TUCKER .ATTOFlN€YS AT 6AMY ♦ ......e,o. 9C.bana .nQ%c.{ION.1. ro..ona•10v* City Council March 17, 1992 Page 3 for the current project approvals was prepared in 1981, over ten years ago (the "Original EIR"). This document was supplemented by a Subsequent EIR prepared in 1986 in conjunction with the consideration of the Soboba Springs Master Plan (the "Subsequent EIR"). The Subsequent EIR did not update the information included in the Original EIR relating to Soils/Geology/Seismic, Archeology, Biotic Resources and Flood Control. The mitigation measures from the original EIR were simply carried forward. Of critical importance to us is the fact that both the original EIR and the Subsequent EIR are inadequate in that they failed to address the impacts of the project on the Mobile Home Park. Important issues such as the impact of the project on emergency access, secondary emergency access from the Mobile Home Park, views and setbacks were simply not addressed. Other data is significantly out of date. As planned secondary emergency access from the Mobile Home Park will be provided in an area identified as being subject to inundation. Hence the very event which will make the secondary access necessary is likely to make it unusable. This is unacceptable. The EIRs are inadequate in their discussion of the need for access for emergency vehicles in the event of the acknowledged potential for flooding or seismic activity. The only mitigation proposed is the construction of a bridge over the San Jacinto River and the construction of a fire station within the planning area. No discussion is included in the EIR with respect to when these improvements should be provided and only vague references are made to whether a feasible means of financing these improvements exists. Even given this weak analysis your planning commission proposed eliminating the timing constraint for the construction of the bridge improvements in conjunction with the most recent project approvals. No environmental evaluation of the elimination of this requirement was made. The suggestion by the fire department that equipment could be moved to the planning area in the event of an emergency begs the question of whether access will be RLJTAN a TUGGER A!TC CYS AT LAW City Council March 17, 1992 Page 4 available to do so. There is no reliable predictor of seismic activity or even flooding to the extent such predictability would be required to make the suggested mitigation measure feasible. Finally, the Subsequent EIR undertook no evaluation of the cumulative impacts of this significant project. While the assertion that development in the area was to uncertain to evaluate cumulative impacts was arguably true in 1986, it is certainly not true now. significant growth has occurred in this region and much more is in the planning process. The EIRs are fatally defective as a result of their failure to evaluate the cumulative impacts of the project. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n v. Regents of the University of California, 47 Cal. 3d 376 (1988). The City is seeking to utilize the previous EIRs for the current project pursuant to Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (the "Guidelines"). This Section is available only if the requirements of Section 15162 of the Guidelines are met as well. Section 15162 provides that a preexisting EIR can be used unless "(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken . which will require important revisions to the previous EIR . . . due to the involvement of new significant environmental impacts not covered in a previous EIR . . ., or (3) New information of substantial importance to the project becomes available . . ." The elimination of the bridge as a requirement of the project from a timing standpoint is a substantial change in the circumstances under which the project is to be undertaken. The consequences of the bridge being constructed at some undetermined time, potentially many years following complete build out of the project, was not considered in the previous EIRs and they are therefore not QuTAN & TUCKER A1'7ORNtY5 AT LAW g 1.i!“.3^1�J IM Qt'JJ.NO .•CIRGOIONA G01P0•.iie Ns city Council March 17, 1992 Page 5 adequate to serve as an EIR for the project under the provisions of Section 15182 of the Guidelines. Moreover the passage of time and the changes in circumstances relating to surrounding development make the EIR outdated and inadequate, particularly insofar as Tthe discussion of cumulative impacts is concerned. information is IRs. specifically l referred newo as being information unknown is now the previous EIRs. available and should be analyzed. In view of the foregoing we respectfully request that the City Council not proceed with the approval of the project until such time as a new initial study has been completed and the EIRs for the project have been n supplemented to address these issues as required by California Environmental Quality Act. Vary ty yours, RUT - Rog= G ble 2/077/099999-0084/21 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF I'HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO APPROVING THE SOBOBA SPRINGS SPECIFIC PLAN (SPECIFIC PLAN 1-85) AMENDMENT #1, SUBJECT TO THE FINDINGS OF FACT, AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing in August 1986 for the EIR and Specific Plan 1-85 (Soboba Springs Specific Plan); WHEREAS, the following impacts were discussed in the preliminary EIR: Geology/Seismic/Soils, Archaeology, Biotic Resources, Flood Control, Police Protection, Fire Protection, Educational Facilities, Health Services, Parks and Recreation, Water, Sewer, Solid Waste Disposal, Energy Use and Conservation, and Traffic and Circulation. WHEREAS, Geologic/Seismic/Soils shall be mitigated by setbacks, building construction practices, and proper soil compaction techniques. WHEREAS, no archaeological sites were found on the subject property; WHEREAS, no unusual or endangered plant or animal species were found; WHEREAS, flooding shall be mitigated by designing drainage facilities to with stand the 100 year rains; WHEREAS, educational facilities shall be financed through special financing districts and by state authorized school mitigation fees; WHEREAS, no mitigation measures are necessary for health services; WHEREAS, wat and sewer main lines shall be provided by the developer; WHEREAS, Title 24 Energy Standards for Residential and Co are required via State regulations; REAS, tra and other street improve WHEREAS, the EIR required the building of a bridge be construc first 500 dwelling units; d after the WHEREAS, the creation of the Soboba Springs Redevelopment Project Area is to provide the financing mechanism for the construction of the bridge; WHEREAS, the DER also required a fire substation be built within the Soboba Springs Specific Plan; WHEREAS, input was received from the public of the original proposal of 1490 dwelling units; BACKGROUND A project on the site was originally approved by the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors in 1981 to allow for 857 dwellings. The site was subsequently annexed to the City in 1985, and a new Specific Plan was approved for to allow for upwards of 1490 dwellings. The Specific Plan approved for the City included the six Village concept currently proposed, but contemplated a higher density development per Village. The current Specific Plan allows for primarily attached and townhouse type developments, with Village II the only area proposed for standard single family development. At this time, individual projects have been approved for Villages I, II, III and IV. Villages I and IV have received comprehensive development plan approval to allow for a 75 unit condominium complex (Village I) and a 172 lot R-2 PUD for detached single family homes on 4,500 square foot lots (Village IV) which has been partially constructed and occupied. Villages II and III have had tentative maps approved and are currently in the process to be amended related to this request. The amendment requests are for 252 standard single family residential lots (Village II) and 148 detached R-1 PUD single family lots (Village III), respectively. In addition, at this time an application for a 140-lot custom single family subdivision has been submitted for Village VI and will processed concurrently with this request. This would result in a modification of the planned land use of Village VI, which previously was slated for a condominium project of up to 350 units. The proposed change to Village V is to allow 2 alternatives for development; Alternative "A" proposes 88 attached dwellings, Alternative "B" proposes a 200 room hotel. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS en originally approved, an Environmental Impact Report was prepared and ce nceptual Specific Plan. Upon the certification of the EIR, mitigation measures established based upon technical studies prepared for and related to the Elk It has determined that the Amended Conceptual Specific Plan is in substantial conformance the Certified EIR The following are issues related to the Amended Conceptual Plan that require further discussion: Fire Protection The original Elk anticipated construction of a fire station within the Soboba Springs Specific Plan area (Village II) on the south side of Soboba Road, just east of the existing Soboba Springs Mobilehome Park. Upon further evaluation by the City Fire Department it was determined that such a location was not desirable. As previously proposed, the station would be isolated on the east side of the river and would not be strategically located to provide adequate response time to the west side of the City. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 2 STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Hixson and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian Mc Nabb, Director of Community Development DA I E: February 26, 1992 SUBJ: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACI ASSESSMENT AND CONCEPTUAL SPECIFIC PLAN 1-85, AMENDMENT 1 APPLICANT: RICE DEVELOPMENT 163 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 (714) 654-4454 ENGINEER: NBS/LOWRY 1545 West Florida Avenue Hemet, CA 92344 (714) 658-7116 DESCRIPTION A proposal to amend the previously approved Conceptual Specific Plan to eliminate a fire station site previously indicated for Village II and to change the land use plan for Villages II, III, V and VI. The subject property is located adjacent to Soboba Road, north and south of Lake Park Drive. The site encompasses a total of 400 acres, and as amended would result in a build -out of 876 dwellings, or 788 and a 200 room hotel. EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT "B" EXHIBIT "C"' EXHIBIT "D" EXHIBIT "E" EXHIBIT "F' EXHIBIT "G' PLANNING COMMISSION EXISTING CIRCULATION EJ EMENT FLOOD ZONE SEISMIC ZONE FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 1 Schools The Environmental Impact Report prepared for the original Specific Plan, contemplated formation of or participation in a Community Facilities District for mitigation of school impacts. Additionally, the City and the School District have since entered into a Cooperation Agreement which requires that all new developments participate in a financing district. The development related to the Specific Plan will be required to participate in a school mitigation financing district. Seismicity/Geology As previously considered in the Specific Plan EIR, the site is traversed by active fault zone. The mitigation measures identified in the previous EIR require that no structures be permitted in the fault zone area plus a setback of 50 feet and that all structures be constructed in accordance with the earthquake standards of the Uniform Building Code. Additionally, the EIR recommended that foundation reinforcement be considered to minimize the potential for subsidence. The mitigation measures indicated above will included as Conditions of Approval for the implementing subdivisions. Drainage Flood control impacts will be mitigated by the provision of detention basins, debris basins and grass lined channels throughout the development. A 2 acre debris basin will be provided in Village II to accept run-off from across Soboba Road, the water will then be conveyed across I 2Ice Park Drive to channels in Village III. Village VI will be providing 2 debris basins on -site prior to conveying run-off across Soboba Road and into the grass lined channels in Village III. The grass lined channels proposed for Village 1.11 will convey the flood waters across the golf course and into the levee. DISCUSSION As indicated previously, the amen ent request will reduce the number of dwellings from upwards of 1500 dwellings to 90,7 The drastic reduction results from the elirnination211) potential units from Villag IV d 222 potential units from Village III. The following m summarizes the contrast of 16/)reNiaus proposal to the amendment request. As originally approved: Village I - Village II - Village ill - Village IV Village V Village VI Up to 90 units Up to 251 lots Up to 370 units - Up to 270 units - Up to 160 units - Up to 350 units PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 4 The Fire Department feels strongly that the station should be relocated to the west side of the river as it would more adequately and safely provide service to a greater portion of the City. Additionally, as mitigation for the project, the developer would be subject to the fire mitigation fee and be required to join the public safety community facilities district. Parks The entire Specific Plan as amended will create a need for additional park land and facilities. The goal set forth in the General Plan is 5 acres of public park per 1,000 people. Specific Plan 1-85, Amendment 2, proposes approximately 900 dwelling units at build -out. Pursuant to the Specific Plan text, there will be 713 single family detached dwellings and 163 single family attached dwellings. Based upon the population generation factor identified in Ordinance #932, the City Park Mitigation Ordinance, the combined population of all 6 Villages is expected to be 2,364. Therefore, the necessary mitigation related to the entire Specific Plan based upon providing 5 acres of park for 1,000 people would be the provision of 11.8 acres of active recreational park land. However, Village IV which is currently under construction and includes 172 lots has already provided park land mitigation. Therefore, after deducting the mitigation from Village TV,' which is equivalent to providing 2.5 acres, the necessary mitigation related to the rest of the development is 9.3 acres. The developer proposes to dedicate to the City 3.6 acres of land as active park space Village II, 7.8 acres within Village 3 of passive space with a trail, and about 40 acres of open space within Village 6 containing a hiking trail. Improvements to the open space will include landscaping, trails and potent majority of the acreage is encumbered by an earthquake fault, flood control facilities and the terrain does not lend itself for active recreational uses. Staff recommends a 25%,credii against the park fee. If 3.6 acres are fully developed as active park space this satisfies the park requirements for Village II. Although the trail systems in Village III and VI provides recreational aspect, it doesn't meet the intent of the Quimby regulations.We do not recommend the Planning Commission include the entire acreage as mitigation necessary to meet park land requirements for the Specific Plan. However, credit should be given to the: developer for the dedication and improvements of the open space which'`may,, analyzing the cost of the improvements, satisfy the required park mitigation. Tally a ballfield on the park site in Village II. The PLANNING COMMISSION I LBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO.3 Maintenance of the open space areas and the financing and construction of the off -site improvements also warrant discussion. The open space areas indicated above are proposed primarily to accommodate the fault zone and flood control improvements. The developer proposes that these areas be dedicated to the City, instead of being privately maintained open space. Dedication to the City would necessitate that the City maintain the open space areas. Staff has conditioned the project to form or join the Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District (LLMD) for the parkway landscape along Soboba Road and I ake park Drive. Additionally, the open space in Village IV will ultimately be maintained by the City through LLMD funds. Therefore, the proposed open space could be included in and maintained by the LLMD as well. Off -site improvements related to the development of the Specific Plan include the bridge across the levee and the sewer and water facilities. The timing for the construction of the bridge is not changing as a result of this application nor is the financing for the sewer and water facilities. The bridge is required to be constructed prior to occupancy of the 500th dwelling in the Specific Plan area. Financing for the bridge construction is derived from Redevelopment funds. Presently, the mechanism is in place for the tax increment funding to occur to allow construction of the bridge. However, construction of additional dwellings is necessary to allow for an increase in the tax increment to pay the projected debt service from the issuance of redevelopment bonds thereby. Financing for the remaining public facilities is currently and would be borne by the CFL) funds, primarily from CFD #1 and CFD #3. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 92- recommending the City Council approve Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85, Amendment #1, subject to the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval. "714$7,il Brian McNabb Director of Community Development PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 6 The amendment request as proposed: Village I - Village II - Village III - Village IV Village V Village VI No change, project approved for 75 condominiums 252 detached single family lots 148 detached single family lots - No change, project approved and under construction for 172 lots - Alternative "A" 88 dwellings units, Alternative "B" 200 room hotel - 140 custom single family lots The individual requests for Villages II, TIT and VI are analyzed pursuant to the accompanying tentative maps: Village II, 1'1 24217, Amd.1; Village Ill, '1'1 23729, Amd.1; and Village VI, TT 27402. Each map is conditioned based upon the individual parcel and development circumstances. The applicant requests that 2 alternatives be considered for V illage V, The hotel concept is proposed for inclusion in Village V. However, any subsequent request for a hotel would require submittal of a comprehensive development plan to analyze the potential viability of the project. The amended conceptual specific plan does establish the theme for the community design, including enhanced entry treatments, building elevations and open space areas. The proposed desit theme incorporates earth tone walls, stucco and view fencing with a recreation orientation. There is potential concern regarding the existing wall on Village IV, therefore Staff has conditioned the project for consistency of wall design. If the project proponent wishes to provide different wall treatment, Staff will require that the existing wall be retrofitted to match. A trail system is proposed that will link Villages II, III and IV. Additionally, a demonstration garden is proposed for Village VI that include native and drought tolerant plants. The amended conceptual plan also provides discussion on the necessary public fa circulation and drainage to serve the project. There are proposed no major revisions to infrastructure plan for the development, except the relocation of the fire station. The primary issue regarding this request is the elimination of the fire station. 'a station was proposed to be located in Village I, east of the mobilehome park on the sou side of Soboba Road. The station is now proposed to be relocated west of the levee so to provide better service to a greater area of the City. Inc developer will be required. join CFD #3 for public safety purposes and pay the fire mitigation fee toward the cost of construction of the eastern fire station. Upon construction, the station would provide service to this area. At this time, it is unknown when the station will be constructed but it is anticipated that the construction of homes in this development will hasten its development. The fire department has indicated that it cap provide adequate service to the area until such time as the station is constructed. Furthermore, the Fire Department indicated that in the event of a major emergency such as a flood, provisions would be made for a truck and crew to be temporarily stationed in the vicinity. PI. NG CO SSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 5 7. The project will impact the ability for the school district to provide adequate educational facilities. Recently, the City and the School District entered into a Cooperation Agreement which requires that all new developments participate in a financing district. The individual Village developments will be required to participate in a school mitigation financing district. 8. The project will generate a need for improved flood control facilities. Flood control impacts will be mitigated by the provision of detention basins, debris basins and grass lined channels throughout the development. A 2 acre debris basin will be provided in Village II to accept run-off from across Soboba Road, the water will then be conveyed across Lake Park Drive to channels in Village III. Village VI will be providing 2 debris basins on -site prior to conveying run-off across Soboba Road and into the grass lined channels in Village III. The grass lined channels proposed for Village HI will convey the flood waters across the golf course and into the levee. 9. The amended Conceptual Specific Plan will generate an impact upon the park and recreation facilities of the City. The necessary mitigation related to the development is 9.3 acres. The developer proposes to dedicate to the City approximately 58 acres of open space related to Villages II, III and VI. Improvements to the open space will include landscaping, trails and potentially a ballfield on the park site in Village II. The majority of the acreage is encumbered by an earthquake fault, flood control facilities and the terrain does not lend itself for active recreational uses. However, credit shall be given to the developer for the dedication and improvements of the open space which may, after analyzing the cost of the improvements, satisfy the required park mitigation. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 8 FINDINGS OF FACT CONCEPTUAL SPECIFIC PLAN 1-85, AMD. 1 AMENDED BY PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 1. The amended conceptual Specific Plan will result in a decrease in density from 3.73 dwellings per gross acre to 2.19 dwellings per gross acre. 2. A mapped seismic special studies zone dissects the subject site. Mitigation measures would be that no structures be permitted in the fault zone area plus a setback of 50 feet. To accommodate the fault zone, the map provides open space areas diagonally across the development and adjacent to Soboba Road. Furthermore, all structures shall be constructed in accordance with the earthquake standards of the Uniform Building Code. Additionally, it is recommended that foundation reinforcement be considered to minimize the potential for subsidence. The mitigation measures indicated above will included as Conditions of Approval for the individual affected subdivisions. 3. The amended conceptual Specific Plan proposes the relocation of the fire station across the levee. The Fire Department concurs with the proposed relocation of the station to the west side of the river as it would more adequately and safely provide service to a greater portion of the City. Additionally, as mitigation for the project, the developer would be subject to the fire mitigation fee and be required to join the public safety community facilities district. 4. ere are adequate se extensions are made. er and wate cd 6. The San Jacinto Valley bas been known in the past to be a habitat or the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. A biological report was conducted pursuant to the Certified EIR which concluded that the area is not occupied habitat and not suitable for K-Rat habitat. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 7 B. No structures shall be pei witted in the fault zone area plus a setback of 50 feet. All structures shall be constructed in accordance with the earthquake standards of the Uniform Building Code. Unless otherwise precluded by a competent soils report, foundation reinforcement shall be required to prevent subsidence of those buildings adjacent to the fault zone. C. Native trees and shrubs shall be incorporated into the landscape plans for all open space areas and parkways within the development. D. D. 8. Appropriate dedication shall be given along Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive. Provide a fifteen foot landscape median with automatic system on Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive. Provide a :landscape median with automatic water se on Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive. 10. Reconstruct Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive to the center line if necessary. Construct a City Standard eight inch curb and gutter and where feasible, meandering five foot sidewalk. A Class II bikeway shall also be provided 4. All public improvements shall conform to the Standards and Specification of the of San Jacinto, 6. All utilities sh e undergroun< ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATING MONITORING 1. Developer shall provide a Declaration stating how all significant en concerns will be mitigated, prior to the recordation of a final map. 2. Upon the approval of the Declaration, it shall be noticed on the Final Map; recorded simultaneously. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. At this time, individual projects have been approved for Villages I, II, III and IV. Villages I and IV have received comprehensive development plan approval to allow for a 75 unit condominium complex (Village I) and a 172 lot R-2 PUD for detached single family homes on 4,500 square foot lots (Village IV) which has been partially constructed and occupied. Villages II and HI have had tentative maps approved and are currently in the process to be amended related to this request. The amendment requests are for 252 standard single family residential lots (Village II) and 148 detached R-1 PUD single family lots (Village III). In addition, at this time an application for a 140-lot custom single family subdivision has been submitted for Village VI and will be processed concurrently with this request. This would result in a modification of the planned land use of Village VI, which previously was slated for a condominium project of up to 350 units. The proposed change to Village V is to allow two alternatives for development; Alternative "A" proposes 88 attached dwellings, Alternative "B" proposes a 200 room hotel. On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the amended conceptual specific plan. The Planning Commission recommended the following changes to the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval, which are attached for your review: FINDINGS OF FACT 4. The amended conceptual specific plan does not change the timing gwortgo ,qpqamtyvasqwwflej for the construction of the bridge across the levee. The bridge is required to be constructed prior to the occupancy of the 500th dwelling in the Specific Plan area. Financing for the bridge construction is derived from redevelopment funds. Presently, the mechanism is in place for the tax increment funding to occur to allow construction of the bridge. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIREMENTS 1. Block wall plans for Sonoma Road and Lake Park Drive, shall submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. Proposed fencing in all other areas of the project shall be in substantial conformance to the fence regulations of Ordinance 340. All fencing and block awl 4 walls shall be constructed prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy. 4. across the levee shall be constructed. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Government Code public hearings were held by the Planning Commission and the City Council concerning the amendment to the Specific Plan 1-85 (the Soboba Springs Specific Plan). WHEREAS, the applicant's amendment to the Soboba Springs Specific Plan will reduced the number of dwelling units to approximately 876; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found the construction of the bridge across the San Jacinto River should not be tied to the number of dwelling units constructed within the Specific Plan but to the time when adequate revenue stream exists to service the bonded indebtedness; WHEREAS, there is a reduction in the number of dwelling units within the project, the park and open space requirements have been revised to 11 acres of active and passive park sites and 46 acres of open space with hiking trails; WHEREAS, the City Fire Department found the construction of the fire station east of the San Jacinto River would not effectively serve the greater portion of the City, but instead will collect the Fire Mitigation fee; WHEREAS, the Fire and Police Departments favorably elected to park a fire vehicle and personnel on the east side of the river if there appears to be a danger of Lake Park Drive being impassable; WHEREAS, Soboba Springs Specific P1 consistent with the original program FIR; endment #1 is substantially BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: That Specific Plan 1-85, Amendment #1 on file with the secretary of the Planning Commission, including the findings of fact, conditions of approval and exhibits, is hereby adopted as the Specific Plan of Land Use for the real property shown on the plan unless the plan is repealed or amended. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED the day of , 1992. City Clerk CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONCEPTUAL SPECIFIC PLAN 1-85,AMD.#1 SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIREMENTS AS AMENDED BY PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 1. Block wall plans for Soboba Pond and Lake Park Drive, shall be submitted prior to 'eet-shall be constructed prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy. 1. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits in Villages 1I, III and VI, the applicant shall establish or join a Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District. Prior to any future development of Village V, a comprehensive development plan shall be approved. 4. Delete bridge across the levee shall be constructed. 5. Prior to occupancy of the 125th dwelling related to Village II, dedicate the 3.6 acre fully improved park site. Improvements shall include trees, grass, irrigation, unlit diamond, restroom, picnic faclities and g ?uri e: Dedication of the improved open space areas of Villages III and VI is to occur simultaneously with the first phases of construction. Improvements to the areas shall include landscaping, irrigation and picnic facilities. Credit shall be given to the developer for the dedication and improvements of any open space which may, after analyzing the cost of the improvements, satisfy the required park mitiga 6. Flood control improvements necessary to mitigate impacts dorm `a 10o year si shall be constructed, including the provision of detention basins, debris basins an grass lined channels throughout the development subject to a hydrology study approved by the City Engineer and/or the Riverside County Flood Control District. 7. The following are established Mitigation Measures from the Certified EIR and shall be satisfied: A. A. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 9 ASTER PLAN I GS CRY Or BAN JACINTO, RIVERSIDE COUNTY ...n....S PIM1[CT aM4Awr MAW. wulD&nt umsn a ,a 'KAM P w....��. 1.1.40,0.014 MtU MG1lrtinS n*,.e 1[wP ,ACV1.t SMRpwo Minn MG{1114$ AMENDED CONCEPTUAL SOBOBA S E6 rlAlt SmoM/ItO a Wilt 11,111.011111101. ACE DEVELOPMENT to *Ala' woo 4010t0 AMIYCUIOCAA[MS n.MA..+1. PROMIN t Urfa 1111TararMa A R VIU.AGE 1 VILLAGE VILAGE teACT SUIT I VILLAGE M CY 311.1Y IMN LOW AY == 3. Upon the start of construction, at six month intervals, and prior to occupancy the developer shall provide a status report relating to compliance with the mitigating measures. 4. Prior to occupancy, the City shall verify compliance with the mitigating measures. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 11 Low Density Residential Open Space Vi Low Density Residential Open Space Low Density Residential Existing & Proposed Exhibit B Existing and Proposed General Plan Amended Conceptual Master Plan Low Density Residential Commercial Low Density Residential Low Densit Residential Hillside Or_wl fensft .: 6esidentlat xisting ropod':f Hillside 1"=1000' Soboba Springs Exhibit A Base Map Amended Conceptual Master Plan Existing Sgl. Fam. Res. San Jacinto River ake Park Drive Vacant San Jacinto River Villa 1 Vacant Exhibit D Existing Uses Amended Conceptual Master Plan San Jacinto River Existing Sgi. Fam. Res. �124217 Vacant Vacant Lake Park Drive Vacant Soboba Road Indian Reservation 1" =1000' • Sod od a Springs Vacant San Jacinto River W - 2 Village 1 R - 1 PUD 11u/ac Exhibit C Existing Zoning Amended Conceptual Master Plan PUD 12 u / ac. Existing SgI. Fam. Res. R - 1 San Jacinto River ndian W - 2 Reservation • Vacant Vacant 0 1"=1000' Soboba Springs Exhibit F Flood Zone Amended Conceptual Master Plan Lake Park Drive 88° Right of Way Secondary Hwy. Vacant Exhibit E Existing Circulation Element Amended Conceptual Master Plan Vacant Existing SgI. Fam. Res. San Jacinto River Vi Existing Mobilehome Park Vacant Vacant ake Park Drive 88' Right of Way Secondary Hwy. Vacant R-1 PUD Indian Reservation Soboba Road 88' Right of Way Secondary Hwy. 1" = 1000' Soboda Springs Exhibit G Seismic Zone Amended Conceptual Master Plan Existing SgI. Fam. Res. Note : A Seismic study has been performed on - sde pursuant to the Soboba Springs Master Plan Environmental Impact Report prepared by Ultrasystems Incorporated, dated May of 1986. Indian Reservation S©b©ba Springs Prepared By: Timothy M. Hults Senior Planner Approved By: Brian McNabb Director of Community Development Attachments: 1. Conditions of Approval as recommended by the Planning Commission. 2. Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 26, 1992. STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: March 17, 1992 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACI MAP 24217 (AMENDMENT #1) APPLICANT: RICE DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SOBOBA ROAD AND LAKE PARK DRIVE (VILLAGE II). DESCRIPTION This is a proposal to amend an approved 251-lot single family residential subdivision of 72.2 acres which encircles the existing Soboba Springs Mobile Home Park. The current request seeks to increase the number of lots to 252, including a 1.6 acre park site and a 2 acre detention/debris basin. The site is Village II of the Soboba Springs Specific Plan. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Tentative Tract 24217 (Amendment #1) subject to the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval and determine that Tentative Tract 24217, Amendment 1, is consistent with the Program Environmental Impact Report certified for Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85, and that Tentative Tract 24217, Amendment 1, is consistent with Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85, Amendment 1. BACKGROUND On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the amended tentative tract map. The Planning Commission recommended the following changes to the Conditions of Approval, which are attached for your review: SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIREMEN 3. Block ati /or-Suiten! wall plans for Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive, consistent entripAttbIo with the existing block wall of Village III and IV, and fence plans shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. Construct a six-foot decorative masonry and/or stucco wall around the project and between project and Mobile Home Park, Proposed fencing in all other areas of the project shall be in substantial conformance to the fence regulations of Ordinance 340. All fencing and block and/ar walls shall be constructed prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Marbclite Street lights shall be provided for all streets in and around the subdivision; type of ,street light to be approved by- the Planning Director, 2. Street trees shall be purchased from the City for planting. iiis..talfddjiciE*4*0 landscaping along Soboba Road and T -ake Park Drive shall have an automatic water sensoring sprinkler device installed. 7. Provide a fifteen ref 'foot landscape median with automatic water sensor sprinkling system on Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive. 8. Entrances to Village II shall have a raised divided planter set-bite-1E a minimum of 35 feet ;#307A. 9. •"' ' '"4", 457,Y1'w. 4: an .... 10. Reconstruct Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive to the center line if necessary. Construct a City Standard eight inch curb and tter and where feasible, a meanderin six foot sidewalk. 4.17-1Walir 18. hand turn radius. PLANNTNG DEPARTMENT 9. lidotosba 4nunedoitef ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 1. All structures shall be set back 50 feet from the fault zone area -6606-66.64 OS* the 4.6te c* 5. Prior to approval of a Final Map application, the developer shall dedicate and improve or provide bonding for improvements specified in thoCOneeptual Specific Plan per City Standards 3.69 acres of land for park facilities as required by Amended Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85. 6. Provide as many as three emergency accesses from the mobile home park at locations a location acceptable to the Public Safety Departments. Prepared By: Timothy M. Hults Senior Planner Approved By: Brian McNabb Director of Community Development Attachments: 1. Conditions of Approval as recommended by the Planning Conunission. 2. Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 26, 1992. Soboba Springs Residents Association 2230 Lake Park Drive • San Jacinto, CA ' 92583 March 11, 1992 The Honorable Francis Boykin City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 Dear Mr. Mayor: It has come to our attention that the San Jacinto City Council, at their upcoming meeting the evening of March 17, 1992, has included on their agenda the recommendations of the City Planning Commission meeting held the evening of February 26. This is specifically regarding Village II of the Jerry Rice Development that will surround the Soboba Springs Mobile Home Park. The de- liberations and any vote by the Council on this item, as you can well imagine, are extremely important to the residents (about 470 of us) of Soboba Springs Mobile Home Park. Meetings are planned to discuss with the residents of the Park the recommendations of the Planning Commission and how we should respond to them. We are sure the City Council is very interested in our views and would welcome hearing what those views and concerns are. However, the rather fast timing of this item appearing on the Council Agenda has caught us by surprise and we have not had an opportunity to prepare for the meeting. Also, a St. Patrick's Day dinner and dance has been planned in our Park for March 17th. For these reasons, we respectfully request that this particular part of the Council Agenda be postponed to a future date so that residents of our Park and management can attend and be represented at the Council deliberations. Thank you for your kind attention to this matter and we look forward to your early and favorable response for this request. Respectful yours, Fred Bryant, P sident Soboba Springs Residents' Association cc: Ed Evans Joe Rodgers FB:hm STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Hixson and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian Mc Nabb, Director of Community Development DATE: February 26, 1992 SUBJ: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND I LNTATIVE TRACT 24217, AMENDMENT 1 APPLICANT: RICE DEVELOPMENT 163 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 (714) 654-4454 ENGINEER: NBS/LOWRY 1545 West Florida Avenue Hemet, CA 92344 (714) 658-7116 DESCRIPTION A proposal to amend a 251 lot single family subdivision of 72.2 acres around the Soboba Springs Mobilehome Park to allow for a 252 lot single family residential subdivision with a 1.6 acre park and a 2 acre detention basin. The subject property is Village II of Specific Plan 1-85, Amendment 2, the Soboba Springs Specific Plan. EXHIBIT "A" BASE MAP EXHIBIT "B" EXISTING/PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT "C' EXISTING ZONING EXHIBIT "D" EXISTING USES EXHIBIT "E" EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT EXHIBIT "F FLOOD ZONE EXHIBIT "G' SEISMIC ZONE I ENTATIVE TRAC 1 24217 FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 1 BACKGROUND On November 15, 1989, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Tentative Tract 24217. On December 19, 1989, the City Council approved Tentative Tract 24217 for 251 single-family lots averaging approximately 7,200 square feet in area and a lot for a future fire station. The applicant is now proposing to increase the number of lots to 252 and eliminate the fire station site. The following indicates the proposed changes to the subdivision: 1. Elimination of the fire station site; previously located in the vicinity of lots 15, 16 and 17. 2. Relocation of Soboba road access to the south; previously located at Street "E" just south of the detention basin. 3. Elimination of the westerly Lake Park Drive entry; will now serve as emergency access only. 4. Slight modification of lot layout in the northeastern portion of the tract; shift Street "D" westerly and increase area of Lot "A" (Park Site). 5. The detention basin just southerly of the park site will be designed to be used as open space, in conjunction with the park site. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Pursuant to Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, subdivisions that are consistent with and implementing an approved Specific Plan do not require preparation of an additional Environmental Impact Report or negative Declaration. However, pursuant to the approved Specific Plan the following impacts related to this site shall be mitigated: Public Facilities & In Parks cture The amended Conceptual Specific Plan requires the dedication and improvement of 9.3 acres of park land based upon Ordinance #932, the City Park Mitigation Ordinance. Tentative Tract 24217, Amendment 1, will be conditioned to require dedication of 3.69 acres of improved park land as required by the amended Conceptual Specific Plan. 1BNTA'TTVE 'RAU 24217 FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 2 Schools The Environmental Impact Report prepared for the original Specific Plan, contemplated formation of or participation in a Community Facilities District for mitigation of school impacts. Additionally, the City and the School District have since entered into a Cooperation Agreement which requires that all new developments participate in a financing district. This development and the related Specific Plan will be required to participate in a school mitigation financing district. Seismicity/Geology As previously considered in the Specific Plan EIR, the site is traversed by active fault zone. The mitigation measures identified in the previous EIR require that no structures be permitted in the fault zone area plus a setback of 50 feet and that all structures be constructed in accordance with the earthquake standards of the Uniform Building Code. Additionally, the EIR recommended that foundation reinforcement be considered to minimize the potential for subsidence. The mitigation measures indicated above will included as conditions of Approval. DISCUSSION The proposed amendment to the subdivision is in substantial conformance with the previously approved map, as indicated in the Background section of this report. Additionally, the project maintains the considerations previously required for buffering the existing Soboba Springs Mobile Home park which include the 8 foot wide landscaped setback, provision of the RV storage facility and the provision of emergency access potential. The original developer agreed to provide an 8 foot wide landscaped buffer adjacent to the proposed development and the existing mobilehome park. The current map depicts this buffer. The RV storage facility provided on Village II will be designed to provide exclusive access from the mobilehome park, as was previously agreed upon. Additionally, this map has been conditioned to provide as many as 3 emergency accesses if deemed necessary by the Fire and Police Departments. Potential issues regarding the development include maintenance of the debris basin and open space area and the financing and construction of the off -site improvements. The debris basin is proposed to be improved open space for recreational use related to the park area to the north. The developer proposes that these areas be dedicated to the City, instead of being privately maintained open space. The debris basin would be subject to regular maintenance as well as clean-up after a storm. The funds to maintain and remove debris from the basin could come from the LLMD. Staff has conditioned the project to form or join the Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District (LLMD) for the parkway landscape along Soboba Road and Lake park Drive. Additionally, the park site could be maintained by the City through LLMD funds as well. I LNTATIVE TRAC 1 24217 FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 3 Off -site improvements related to the development of the Specific Plan and this development include the bridge across the levee and the fire station that was proposed to be located in this subdivision. The timing for the construction of the bridge is not changing as a result of this application or the application to amend the Specific Plan. The bridge is required to be constructed prior to occupancy of the 500th dwelling in the Specific Plan area. Financing for the bridge construction is derived from Redevelopment funds. Presently, the mechanism is in place for the tax increment funding to occur to allow construction of the bridge. However, construction of additional dwellings is necessary to allow for an increase in the tax increment to pay the projected debt service from the issuance of redevelopment bonds thereby. The fire station is proposed to be relocated west of the levee so as to provide better service to a greater area of the City. The developer will be required to join CFD #3 for public safety purposes and pay the fire mitigation fee toward the cost of construction of the eastern fire station. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 92- recommending the City Council approve Tentative Tract 24217 (Amendment #1) subject to the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval. Brian McNabb Director of Community Development TENTATIVE TRACT 24217 FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 4 it rlA OI i ttetf EXIST NVG MOBILEHOME. PARK NOT A PART 1. I ...i.y }....uN 5 „5 }t kEtt � ♦` � YY9 v aa5 4e to /aa w;✓ AMENDED NO. 1 VILLAGE 2 TRACT. NO. 24217 ANCNO*NTI: SCALD lal .w..o..,...w:, aMITYawyv PIGS OSVNLOPMONT 1113 N. Nolo Se. San Jacinto, CA NNNN2 ITM:ff4-44N4 1 MINf0 Lotimallo s of Troop of aP MMPand� San Jacinto VIela. ow wbnwn be MNN NMa In Sock S Papa 304 of Mope. RNwode of San Olmpe Caonay AIMM-140-O610 42121-140-0®4 42 2-140-ONN a_,__PI a}IM LOW DENSITY ANSIONNTIAI. FAROS R-1 (PUDI 004100r- 12I0Y1IPI Men Jaatnta Unified TS !. TN.N Aaron mAIT NUS LOTS • LOTS A THAW L II NOT USEDI acocnON motor EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Noway EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER CINTPPCT Noose SOUTNNPN CALIPOPNIA NCIMON COMPANY pas NOVTNNRN CALPORNIA OAS COMPANY Pnar5P ONNNPAL TNLNPIiiOM COMPANY MAN MOM Jam. mccaPT31Svd..P.x AAAA. A TO PM ONOIOATNO TO CITY OP MAN JACNTO rIN0I 0141 JAN. 1092 T-9-SO)3 O `A f Exhibit A Base Map Tentative Tract Map 24217 Existing Sgl. Fam. Res. San Jacinto River Lake Park Drive Soboba Road Indian Reservation Low Density Residential Villa Low Density Residential Open Space Low Density Residential Existing & Proposed Exhibit B Existing and Proposed General Plan Tentative Tract Map 24217 Low Density Residential Commercial Low Density Residential Hillside Hillside Lake Park Drive Low Density Residential Soboba Road 1" =10001 Sofiofia Springs San Jacinto River W-2 Village 1 R - 1 PUD 11 u / ac Exhibit C Existing Zoning Tentative Tract Map 24217 San Jacinto River Existing SgI. Fam. Res. Vacant Vacant Lake Park Drive Indian Reservation Soboba Road RIO 1" = 1000' Sod od a Spr' J ��Bs Vacant San Jacinto River Exhibit D Existing Uses Tentative Tract Map 24217 San Jacinto River Existing SgI. Fam. Res. Vacant Vacant Lake Park Drive Indian Reservation Soboba Road 1" = 1000' Soboba Springs Exhibit E Existing Circulation Element Tentative Tract Map 2 4217 Vacant Existing Sgl. Fam. Res. San Jacinto River AM, Vacant Vacant Lake Park Drive 88' Right of Way Secondary Hwy. Vacant Indian Reservation Soboba Road 88' Right of Way Secondary Hwy. itt 9' 1" = 1000' SofiodaSprings Vacant Golf Course Existing] Village Exhibit F Flood Zone Tentative Tract Map 24217 Village 4 Existing SgI. Fam. Res. Existing SgI. Fam. Res. 7 Village 6 Village 2 TTM24217 Existing Mobilehome Park TTM 27402 R - 1 PUD Vacant Vacant Vacant Lake Park Drive 88' Right of Way Secondary Hwy. Soboba Road 88' Right of Way Secondary Hwy. Indian Reservation NO 1"=1000' Soboba Springs Exhibit G Seismic Zone Tentative Tract Map 24217 Vacant f�1 Existing SgI. Fam. Res. San Jacinto River Village 1 Note : A Seismic study has been performed on - site pursuant to the Soboba Springs Master Plan Environmental Impact Report prepared by Ultrasystems Incorporated, dated May of 1986. Vacant Vacant Lake Park Drive Vacant Soboba Road Indian Reservation 1"_1000' Soboba Springs FINDINGS OF FACT TENTATIVE TRACT 24217, AMD. 1, VILLAGE II AS AMENDED BY PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 1. Tentative Tract 24217, Amendment 1, is consistent with the approved Conceptual Master Plan 1-85, Amendment 2, 2. The density is within the General Plan Density and Zoning Density specified by the Plan. 3. Tentative Tract Map 24217, Amendment 1, as conditioned is in substantial compliance with the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances. 4. A mapped seismic special studies zone dissects the subject site. Mitigation measures would include no structures being permitted in the fault zone area plus a setback of 50 feet and that all structures be constructed in accordance with the earthquake standards of the Uniform Building Code. Additionally, it is recommended that foundation reinforcement be considered to minimize the potential for subsidence. These measures have been included in the conditions of approval. 5. There are adequate sewer and water facilities to serve the site provided proper extensions are made. 6. The San Jacinto Valley has been known in the past to be a habitat for the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. 7. Tentative Tract 24217, Amendment 1, complies with the conditions and intent of the approved Environmental Tmpact Report. 8. Tentative Tract 24217, Amendment 1, proposes 253 lots which would require the equivalent of 3.69 acres of park land. Staff has added a condition of approval to require mitigation equivalent to dedicating 3.69 acres of improved park land. 9. Tentative tract 24217, Amendment 1, will generate an impact upon the school district to provide the necessary facilities. The City and the School District have entered into a Cooperation Agreement which requires that all new developments participate in a financing district. This development will be required to participate in a school mitigation financing district. CONDTI IONS OF APPROVAL POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. Provide an approved secondary access into the subdivision. 2. Traffic signs shall be installed as approved by the Police Department. SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIREMENTS 1. The developer shall submit CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, AND RESTRIC I IONS including but not limited to the following provisions: 2. 2. A. CC&R's shall include a provision prohibiting recreational vehicle parking within Tract 24217. t,t(AteJ-, B. CC&R's shall have a notification to property owners indicating the maximum lot coverage of any lot shall, not exceed 50%. Lot coverage shall include any structure whether portable, temporary, or permanent, as well as driveway areas. C. CC&R's shall require live landscaping in the front yard on each lot. D. The CC&R's shall prohibit the construction of any antenna, satellite dish or air conditioner on the roof. Antennas shall not exceed the lowest eave height. between project and Mobile Home Park. Proposed feneng in all other areas of the All fencing and block walls shall be constructed prior to the issuance of certificate of-eeeupaner -em.".-www?"m-wrom-mw.s-- ,,,211431' w WItk )posed fnngin all other areas ol Virl 6-- .,.K... Drivc,c:-,-; ".,; . Parie between o. ti § 111 .aiid Mobile n1 3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall establish or join a Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District. 4. Prior to recordation of a final map, a comprehensive development plan shall be approved. PUBLIC WORKS 1.3_�h�tc+��tlilta l S 11 + + 1 7 +} a subject dcNclopmcnt. 1. 2. Street trees shall be purchased from the City for planting. Landscaping along Soboba-Road and Lake Park Drive shall have an automatic water scnsoring sprinkler device installed. 2. esl bobatoad:s ,ter ri 3. Appropriate dedication shall be given along Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive. 4. Curbs, gutters, sidewalks and handicap ramps shall be installed per City Standards and Specifications. 5. Interior streets shall have a minimum 40 feet of paving curb to curb. 6. Street striping and traffic sign plans shall be submitted for approval. 7. Provide a fifteen —feet landscape median with automatic water sensor sprinkling system on Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive. 7. Provide a ten- landscape median with automatic water sensor sprinkling system on Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive. 8. Entrances to Village II shall have a raised divided planter set back a minimum of 35 feet: 8. Entrances to Village II shall have a raised divided planters 9. A handicap ramp shall be provided for access to the park from the development. 10. Reconstruct Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive to the center line if necessary. meandering five foot sidewalk. 10. 11. The public improvements on Soboba Road shall be consistent with the improvements to Villages Ill and IV and on Lake Park Drive with the improvements to Village I and III. 12. Where required, a left turn pocket shall be constructed in the median. 13. All public improvements shall conform to the Standards and Specification of the City of San Jacinto. 14. Prior to submittal of a Final Map application, submit a detailed hydrologic study to determine design storm flow rates and debris potential. A. Provide a proposal to adequately collect, convey and outlet storm flows with specific consideration made for debris loading and deposition onsite and offsite including: B. Provide a mechanism to maintain the drainage system. 15. Per Flood Control, debris basin shall accommodate the flow of drainage from the hillside water shed. Drainage shall be directed in an approved drainage structure to an acceptable outlet. Downstream drainage easements shall be obtained as necessary. 16. Extend the levee to Soboba Road to provide protection from hillside drainage. 17. Street "C" shall align with entry to Village Ill. 18. DELETE The - constructed as a right hand turn radius. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Prior to submittal of Final Map application, landscape and automatic water sensoring sprinkler system plans along Lake Park Drive and Soboba Road and entry treatment plans for each entry shall be submitted for approval. Landscaping shall be compatible to that of Village IV. 2. Prior to submittal of final map application, landscape and sprinkler system plans for the common open space/park and typical front yards shall be submitted. 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit a soils report and grading plans shall be submitted for approval. 4. All applicable fees shall be paid at the time of the issuance of the building permit. 5. All utilities shall be underground. 6. Traffic Signal Mitigation fees, applicable at the time the final map application, shall be paid prior to the recordation of the Final Map. 7. Prior to submittal of a grading plan for review, a Stephen's Kangaroo Rat survey shall be conducted and submitted for review. 8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the development shall participate in the formation of a community facilities district or annex into CFD #1 and CFD #3 for the construction of off -site improvements and for public safety purposes. 9. Only 911e to1y hcime may be OnStructedimmediatcly'adjacOf to th Mbi1e 11011.: Park ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 1. 1. • feet )table to the city. 2. All structures be constructed in accordance with the earthquake standards of the Uniform Building Code. 3. If determined necessary by the soils report, foundation reinforcement shall be required to minimize the potential for subsidence. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall pay all school fees and participate in the formation and establishment of a community facilities district and the issuance of bonds thereby, and/or participate in other satisfactory alternative financing programs to finance educational facilities. 5. Prior to „approval of a Final Map application, the developer shall dedicate and improvePS:Pif4404.4. ifct.'0,014,men41i0.07**M11!:4ars., per City Standards 3.69 acres of land for park facilities as required by amended Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85. 6. 6. Rom,-,P4kAti loogiati*co ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATING MONITORING 1.. Developer shall provide a Declaration stating how all significant environmental concerns will be mitigated, prior to the recordation of a final map. 2. Upon the approval of the Declaration, it shall be noticed on the Final Map and recorded simultaneously. 3. Upon the start of construction, at six month intervals, and prior to occupancy the developer shall provide a status report relating to compliance with the mitigating measures. 4. Prior to occupancy, the City shall verify compliance with the mitigating measures. FIRE DEPARTMENT INCORPORA E HEREIN THE FIRE DEPARTMENTS CHECKLIST DATED STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: March 17, 1992 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTA FIVE TRACI MAP 27402 APPLICANT: RICE DEVELOPMENT 3-17-9 LOCATION: EAST SIDE OF SOBOBA ROAD, NORTH OF THE EASTERLY PROLONGATION OF LAKE PARK DRIVE (VILLAGE VI) DESCRIP'PION This is a proposal for a 140-lot single family residential subdivision, including 9 open space lots, of 124.12 acres located at Village VI of the Soboba Springs Conceptual Specific Plan. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Tentative Tract 27402 subject to the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval and determine that Tentative Tract 27402 is consistent with the Program Environmental Impact Report certified for Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85, and that Tentative Tract 27402 is consistent with Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85, Amendment 1. BACKGROUND The proposed project is located on the hillside which requires preparation of a slope analysis to determine the lot sizes and extent of grading. The slope analysis determined that the includes three distinct slope areas. The following is a summary of the three slope areas: 1. Area A - Lots 1-5, 75-77 and 124-140, 11.52 acres. This area experiences an average slope of 14 percent. 2. Area B - Lots 6-20, 39-74 and 78-123, 67.28 acres. This area experiences an average slope of 22 percent. 3. Area C - Lots 21-38. 45.20 acres. This area experiences an average slope of 36 percent. Ordinance No. 894, the City's Hillside Ordinance, has varying regulations for grading, pad size, and set -backs based on the average slope. Therefore, because the site exhibits three distinct slope areas, Village VI will be developed with three distinct neighborhoods. For instance, Area "A" will primarily be a standard single family subdivision; Area "B" will reflect a more custom subdivision with varying lot sizes and set -backs; and Area "C" will be developed on a lot by lot basis with large lots in excess of an acre, custom homes of varying design and very minimal grading. On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Tentative Tract map. The Planning Commission recommended the following changes to the Conditions of Approval, which are attached for your review: SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIREMENTS The following conditions are required: 1. Prior to submittal of a Final Map Application, a Comprehensive Development Plan shall be submitted. C. Development plans shall also include but not limited to the following: 4. - 4. developersubmit to the Community Development Depathuent .a specific plot 014,11.,*which elevation and floor plan shall be placed on each on fle, approved by the city. 5. A detailed grading plan shall be submitted to ensure pl' with the Hillside Ordinance, 5. issuance of each building Pc Hillside bmitted on a per Int basis prior to:. • to ensure compliance withthe 2. Block wall fence-pla-as—shall b-e submitted prior to—issuanee—ef Pro•osed ther—areas-of the13-re-j-cet-sliall to the fence regulations of Ordinance 340. All fenct constructed prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy. Block and/or stucco or Boboba Road co 2. or stucco wall pi f , nipatible,witit the existing block f Village IV and fence plans b Ili, apt rope d f a ‘ all areas of building- Pel-mit, - se eTICHIff in otherrior ° ance of a confo lee to the fence regulations of the project shall he in substantial Ordinance 340, fencing and block i and/or stucco 1-4'011-s shall he constructed Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 3. Fencing will not be required around the perimeter of the tract, as that would restrict wildlife movement and be contrary to the natural environment. However, to preclude hikers from exiting the trail and damaging the environment, some sort of access restriction shall be required. iguage-that indicates -lea '-bite€47. The city shall access res. IC11°11 as part of the landscape Plan- Options to be explored incluaest age, low r fencing, and landscaping. PUBLIC WORKS 2. Street trees shall be r-chase-d--from _caping along . . 2. Street tree: shall be installed in accordance with City policy: landscaping along Soboba Pi ad shall have an automatic water sensoring sprinkler devise installed. 7. Provide a fifteen foot landscape median with automatic water sensor sprinkling system on Soboba Road. 7. Provide a ten -foot landscape median with automatic water sensor sprinkling system on Soboba Road. 9. A handicap ramp shall be provided for access to the park from the parking lot. 9. Handicap access to the demonstration garden shall be provided per State and Federal regulation. 14. Prior to submittal of a Final Map application, submit a detailed hydrologic study to determine design storm flow rates and debris potential. A. Provide a proposal to adequately collect, convey and outlet storm flows with specific consideration made for debris loading and deposition onsite and offsite including: 2. 2. PLANNING DEPARTMENT othe golf con e sha be nbrt-eroding: 6. DELETE A--pawing---area shall be pro Tided for the demonstration garden to aeeem eoate- ri ni-m m e Balls inel u.d ng wh inches of decomposed granite. The parkiHg arca should b landscap Prepared By: Timotb+ M. Hults Senior Planner Approved By: Brian McNabb Director of Community Development Attachments: 1. Conditions of Approval as recommended by the Planning Commission. 2. Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 26, 1992. STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Ver Plank and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: February 26, 1992 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACI MAP 27402 APPLICANT: RICE DEVELOPMENT 163 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 (714) 654-4454 ENGINEER: NBS/Lowry 1545 West Florida Avenue Hemet, CA 92344 (714) 658-7116 DESCRIPTION A proposal 140-lot single family residential subdivision, including 9 open space lots, of 124.12 acres located at Village VI of the Soboba Springs Conceptual Specific Plan on the east side of Soboba Road, northeast of the easterly prolongation of Lake Park Drive (Main Street). EXHIBIT "A" BASE MAP EXHIBIT "B" EXISTING/PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT "C" EXISTING ZONING EXHIBIT "D" EXISTING USES EXHIBIT "E" EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT EXHIBII "F' FLOOD ZONE EXHIBIT "G" SEISMIC ZONE PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 1 BACKGROUND The proposed project is located on the hillside which requires preparation of a slope analysis to determine the lot sizes and extent of grading. The slope analysis determined that the includes three distinct slope areas. The following is a summary of the three slope areas: 1. Area A - Lots 1-5, 75-77 and 124-140, 11.52 acres. This area experiences an average slope of 14 percent. Pursuant to the Hillside Ordinance, Ordinance 894, all of the lots in this area may be a minimum of 7,200 square feet. The proposed subdivision indicates all lots exceeding 7,200 square feet and an average lot size of 13,778.95 square feet. 2. Area B - Lots 6-20, 39-74 and 78-123, 67.28 acres. This area experiences an average slope of 22 percent. In this area 70 percent of the lots shall be a minimum of 10,000 square feet, with the overall average lot size 10,000 square feet. Within this category, 70 percent of the proposed lots are a minimum of 10,000 square feet and the proposed average is 11,029.31 square feet. 3. Area C - Lots 21-38. 45.20 acres. This area experiences an average slope of 36 percent. Within this slope category 70 percent of lots shall be a minimum of 20,000 square feet, with the overall average lot size 20,000 square feet. The proposed map shows all lots in this area exceeding the minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet, with the proposed average lot size of 59,266.55 square feet. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Pursuant to Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, subdivisions that are consistent with and implementing an approved Specific Plan do not require preparation of an additional Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration. However, pursuant to the approved Specific Plan the following impacts related to this site shall be mitigated: Biology The site includes a mixture of native and introduced flora, including the sage scrub. None of the plants on -site are considered rare or endangered, but the proposed landscaping for the development should include a mixture of native trees and shrubs. Additionally, the applicant proposes approximately 45 acres of natural open space, to include a hiking trail and a water wise demonstration garden. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 2 Wildlife resources on the site include a variety of birds, reptiles and mammals At this time none of these animal resources are considered endangered. However, as indicated above the site includes the sage scrub which is the habitat for the gnat -catcher, a small bird considered to be a threatened species not yet protected. Furthermore, the previous EIR did not indicate whether the gnat -catcher was observed on -site. However, with the proposed retention of approximately 45 acres of natural open space, there will be space for gnat - catcher habitat sufficient to provide for cover and forage. Public Facilities & Infrastructure Parks The entire Specific Plan as amended will create a need for additional park land and facilities. This subdivision will be conditioned to comply with requirements set forth in Specific Plan 1-85, Amendment 1. Schools The Environmental Impact Report prepared for the original Specific Plan, contemplated formation of or participation in a Community Facilities District for mitigation of school impacts. Additionally, the City and the School District have since entered into a Cooperation Agreement which requires that all new developments participate in a financing district. This development will be required to join a school mitigation financing district. Fire The original EIR anticipated construction of a fire station within the Soboba. Springs Specific Plan area (Village II) on the south side of Soboba Road, just east of the existing Soboba Springs Mobilehome Park. Upon further evaluation by the Fire Department it was determined that such a location was not desirable. As previously proposed, the station would be isolated on the east side of the river and not be strategically located to provide adequate response time to the west side of the City. The Fire Department feels strongly that the station should be relocated to the west side of the river as it would more adequately and safely provide service to a greater portion of the City. Additionally, as mitigation for the project, the developer would be subject to the fire mitigation fee and be required to join the public safety community facilities district. Furthermore, because the site is in a high fire hazard area, project specific mitigation measures will be necessary and added as Conditions of Approval. These measures include providing fire sprinklers in every dwelling, fully boxing the eaves, providing 20 foot wide fuel modification zone around each dwelling and providing access for a fire department light apparatus vehicle to gain access to within 200 feet of the perimeter of each lot. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 3 Water The applicant proposes to construct two water tanks, a 2,000,000 gallon tank and a 200,000 gallon tank. The additional capacity will serve the entire Specific Plan development, including the existing Soboba Terrace. Sewer Sewer facilities will be provided by Eastern Municipal Water District via the existing sewer transmission mains constructed to serve the mobile home park and Village IV. The lift station capacity will be expanded to accommodate the increased flows. Drainage The drainage concept for Village VI includes two debris basins, one the north side of the site and one on the south side of the site. The debris basins are necessary to collect brush and rocks to convey only "clear" water downstream across Soboba Road. The drainage facilities will be designed to be incorporated into the channels of Village ILI and Village IV and eventually conveyed into the golf course and ultimately into the river. The actual sizing of the necessary facilities will be determined based on a hydrology report which will have to be submitted prior to approval of the public works improvement plans. DISCUSSION The site is located on the east side of Soboba Road, northeast of the easterly prolongation of Lake Park Drive. The site currently vacant, exhibits significant relief with three distinct slope areas ranging from 14 percent to 36 percent. The site includes a mixture of native and introduced flora, including the sage scrub. Proposed landscaping for the development should include a mixture of native trees and shrubs, especially in the common open space areas. Furthermore, the applicant is proposing to retain up to 45 acres of natural open space which will include the continuation of the sage scrub habitat. Within the open space areas the applicant proposes a hiking trail linking the site with the Villages II and DI and a demonstration garden. Existing surrounding land uses consist of residential uses immediately to the west, across Soboba Road and across Lake Park Drive, and the golf course to the northwest. The potential for conflict is minimal, as the homes in closest proximity are also custom homes on large lots as proposed. Additionally, pursuant to the Specific Plan process a comprehensive development plan must be submitted to ensure that compatibility of land use is maintained. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 4 When originally approved, the Conceptual Specific Plan contemplated a maximum of 3 dwelling units per acre for the subject site. The proposed tentative tract proposes a density of 1.2 dwelling units per acre, consistent with Amended Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85. The proposed development is for primarily custom tract homes in Areas "A" and ''B", with individual custom home sites for Area "C". The current zoning for the property is "R-1" (Single -Family), which requires a minimum of 7,200 square foot lots. However, because the development is in the hillside, the project will have to comply with Ordinance #894. The requirements of Ordinance #894 pertaining to lot size have been addressed. The slope percentage is the primary determining factor regarding grading. As it pertains to this map, grading within "Area A" would not be limited as mass grading is permitted in the up to 15 percent slope category. Within "Area B", a maximum of 60 percent of the pad may be graded. The maximum amount of grading in "Area C" is 35 percent of the pad. The grading concept proposed for "Areas A & C" is consistent with the Hillside Ordinance. However, the grading proposed for "Area B" is not consistent with the Hillside Ordinance, as the map proposes lots stepped up the hillside with some pads being 100 percent graded. As a result, Staff has conditioned the project grading to be consistent with the Hillside Ordinance. Prior to approval of the comprehensive development plan for the site, a detailed grading plan shall be submitted to ensure the compliance of each lot with the Hillside Ordinance. There is a possibility that a the map will achieve less density as a result of reducing the grading. The intent the Hillside Ordinance is maintain a maximum amount of open space. Therefore, the Hillside Ordinance allows flexibility in building orientation, as setbacks are determined based upon the individual lot circumstance. One significant issue is parking for the water wise demonstration garden proposed for the open space Lot "D". There is a potential for conflict between the proposed home owners in the vicinity of the garden and the patrons who would most likely be parking on the street. Therefore, Staff has conditioned the project to provide a parking area in close proximity to the demonstration garden. The parking area should provide for a minimum of 6 stalls including wheel stops and be improved with 4 inches of decomposed granite. The parking area should be landscaped, time posted and gated to prevent late night activities. Additionally, an easily accessible trail should be provided from the parking area to the garden. Landscape treatment, entry treatment and fencing shall comply with the Amended Conceptual Specific Plan. A detailed landscape plan is required to be approved by the Planning Commission and will be considered with the Comprehensive Specific Plan. The landscape plan shall include erosion control for all slope areas, the parkway along Soboba Road and the buffering of the water tanks. Entry treatment for the project will include a raised median in the center of each entry way and landscaping and block wall treatments at the corners. PLANNING COMMISSION ILBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 5 Fencing for the development will include a combination of decorative block along Soboba Road, view fencing and wood fencing between individual properties. Fencing will not be required around the perimeter of the tract, as that would restrict wildlife movement and be contrary to the natural environment. However, to preclude hikers from exiting the trail and damaging the environment, some sort of access restriction should be considered. One potential form would be provision of a split rail fence and signage that indicates leaving the trail is prohibited. This form of fencing will not impede wildlife movement or significantly impact the environment. It would also, however, not fully restrict access to the native areas to those few who disregard restrictions. However, City Ordinance requires fencing around the perimeter of lots, therefore a fencing plan shall be submitted with the comprehensive development plan. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 92- recommending the City Council approve Tentative Tract 24702 subject to the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval. ( Brian McNabb Director of Community Development PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 6 A.P.N.647-109.000 ACE)PARK AREA LA/ $ SOBOBA SPRINGS CITY OF SAN JACINTO, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TRACT 27402 )VILLAGE 6) LR OR"NP'.. A.P.N. 047.100-00S A.P.N. 047-120-007 A P H. 697.120.406 TVP sT PEATIC 1112.11.1 AMENDER Pi SOBOBA SPRINGS TENTATIVE TRACT 1N, 2 T902 AMENDMENTS OWNER/APPLICANT LAND USE NO. PP PROPOSED LOTS UTILRIEO ,• .n.. , u•.« v.. OENENAL PLAN ., LOTS OPEN SPACE / PARK AREAS (LOTS A THRU) ) Exhibit A Base Map Tentative Tract Map 27402 Golf Cours Existint Village 4 Existing Sgl. Fam. Res. San Jacinto River Existing Sgl. Fam. Res. 24217 Existing Mobilehome Park 27402 Vacant Lake Park Drive Soboba Road Indian Reservation 1"=1000' So&ofa Springs Vacant San Jacinto River W - 2 R - 1 PUD 11u Iac Exhibit C Existing Zoning Tentative Tract Map 27 4 0 2 San Jacinto River W - 2 Existing Sgi. Fam. Res. R - 1 Vacant Vacant ake Park Drive Vacant R . 3 Soboba Road Indian Reservation 1" = 1000' Soboba Springs Vacant San Jacinto River Vacant Exhibit D Existing Uses Tentative Tract Map 2 7 4 0 2 San Jacinto River Existing Sgl. Fam. Res. Vacant Vacant Lake Park Drive Soboba Road Indian Reservation i" =1000' Soboba Springs Exhibit E Existing Circulation Element Tentative Tract Map 2 7 4 0 2 Vacant Existing Sgi. Fam. Res. San Jacinto River Vacant Vacant Vacant Lake Park Drive 88' Right of Way Secondary Hwy. -41 Soboba Road 88' Right of Way Secondary Hwy. Indian Reservation 1" = 1000' Sobafia Springs Vacant Exhibit F Flood Zone Tentative Tract Map 27 4 0 2 Existing Sgi. Fam. Res. Village 4 Existing SgI. Fam. Res. Village 3 TTM 23729 R-1 PUD Village 2 TTM24217 Existing Mobilehome \ Park Village 6 TTM 27402 R-1 PUD ./* Vacant Vacant Vacant ake Park Drive 88' Right of Way Secondary Hwy. Soboba Road 88' Right of Way Secondary Hwy. Indian Reservation 1" = 1000' So6a6a s S rin J Springs Exhibit G Seismic Zone Tentative Tract Map 27402 Existing Sgl. Fam. Res. Note : A Seismic study has been performed on - site pursuant to the Soboba Springs Master Plan Environmental Impact Report prepared by Ultrasystems Incorporated, dated May of 1986. Lake Park Drive Soboba Road Indian Reservation 1" = 1000' Soboba Springs FINDINGS OF FACT TENTATIVE'1'RACT 24702, VILLAGE VI AS APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 1. Tentative Tract 27402 is consistent with the approved Conceptual Master Plan 1-85, Amendment 1. 2. The density is within the General Plan Density and Zoning Density specified by the Plan. Tentative Tract Map 27402 as conditioned is in substantial compliance with the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances. 4. There will be adequate sewer and water facilities to serve the site provided proper extensions are made. The applicant proposes to construct two water tanks, a 2,000,000 gallon tank and a 200,000 gallon tank. Sewer facilities will he provided by Eastern Municipal Water District via the existing sewer transmission mains constructed to serve the mobile home park and Village IV. The lift station capacity will be expanded to accommodate the increased flows. 5. Biotic resources will be impacted by the development. However, none of the plants or animals on -site are considered endangered. Additionally, the applicant proposes approximately 45 acres of natural open space, to include a hiking trail and a water wise demonstration garden. The retention of approximately 45 acres of natural open space will preserve sage scrub and provide space for gnat -catcher habitat, a potentially sensitive bird species. 6. The project will generate an impact on the San Jacinto Unified School District. The City and the School District have recently entered into a Cooperation Agreement which requires that all new developments participate in a financing district. This development will be required to join a school mitigation financing district. 7. The project will create a need for additional park land and facilities. This subdivision will be conditioned to comply with requirements set forth in Specific Plan 1-85, Amendment 1. 8. Drainage facilities will have to be constructed to the development and protect downstream properties. Drainage facilities proposed include two debris basins necessary to collect brush and rocks to convey only "clear" water downstream across Soboba Road. The actual sizing of the necessary facilities will be determined based on a hydrology report which will have to be submitted prior to approval of the public works improvement plans. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 1 9. The site is in a high fire hazard area which will require specific mitigation measures to added as Conditions of Approval. These measures include providing fire sprinklers in every dwelling, fully boxing the eaves, 20 foot wide fuel modification zone around each dwelling and constructing the hiking trail and/or providing a fire road so that a fire department light apparatus vehicle can gain access to within 200 feet of the perimeter of each lot. 10. Tentative Tract 27402 complies with the conditions and intent of the approved Environmental Impact Report. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT 27402, VILLAGE VI AS APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIREMENTS The following conditions are required: 1. Prior to submittal of a Final Map Application, a Comprehensive Development Plan shall be submitted. A. The Development Plan shall he submitted setting forth the following: 1. The exact boundaries and legal description of the property to be developed. 2. All proposed improvements that are to be constructed on the land and their precise locations. 3. Common open space showing size, grades, and function upon completion. 4. The location and dimension of all off street parking facilities, public and private. 5. A tabulation of the percentage of total building coverage of the development. 6. A tabulation of densities within the project. C. Development plans shall also include but not limited to the following: 1. Building elevations. 2. Floor plans, unit size in square feet, and the amount of private open space in square feet. 3. Detailed landscaping plans. 4. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the developer shall specific plot plan indicating which elevations and floor plans shall be placed on PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 3 2. each -lot. submission shall --be plans on file, afpro:ed by the City. 4. Prior to the anee of each building permit, the,levelope submit to the Community Development Department a specific plan indicating Which elevation and floor plan shall be placed on ea. lot. Such submission shall be in substantial conformance to the plans'. on file, approved by the; City, 5. t c Hillside Ordinance. 5. A detailed grading plan shall be sub' issuance of . each building peri` Hillside ordinance. 6. Provide declaration showing compliance with all portions of the Hillside Ordinance IV, and ran a o risten , tr n misting block ‘‘all of —Village cnec plans shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. to the fence regulations of Ordinance 340. All constructed prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy. 2. Bloc wall ('. rt 11-be- of oba Road; cotnpatib all file. submmtted prior itlr the exit 3. Fencing will not be required around the perimeter of the tract, as that would restrict wildlife movement and be contrary to the natural environment. However, to preclude hikers from exiting the trail and damaging the environment, some sort of access restriction shall be required. One potential form would be provision of a split ra' gnage that indicates leaving the trail is prohibited approve.tile accessr tr ctlon apart of the landscape? plan..Optionst€ include sign age, low er cing, and:lanrlscaping; 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall establish or join a Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 4 PUBLIC WORKS 1. Marbelite street lights or approved equivalent shall be provided on all streets per City Standards. 2. Street trees shall bc purcht.bed—from—the City for planting —Landscaping—along Soboba Road shall have an a-etontatic v,ater sensoring sprinkler device installed7 2. Street trees shall ,,,ke installed in aeccirdalice with City policy- landcaping along Soboba Road shalt have ari autoitiatie water sensoring sprinkler devise ira' stalittd. 3. Appropriate dedication shall he given along Soboba Road. 4. Curbs, gutters, sidewalks and handicap ramps shall be installed per City Standards and Specifications. 5. Interior streets shall have a minimum 40 feet of paving curb to curb, except as otherwise permitted by the Hillside Ordinance. 6. Street striping and traffic sign plans shall be submitted for approval. 7. Provide a fifteen —foe+ landscape median with automatic water sensor sprinkling system on Soboba Road. 7. Provide a ten-fOOt landscape median with automatic water sensor sprinkling system on Soboba Road. 8. Entrances to Village VI shall have a landscaped median 9. 9. Handicip,aees,g to the demonstration gar regulation; i shall be- provided per State tnd 10. Reconstruct Soboba Road to the center line if necessary. Construct a City Standard eight inch curb and gutter and where feasible, a meandering 5 foot sidewalk. Construct a Class II bikeway along Soboba Road. 11. The public improvements on Soboba Road shall be consistent with the improvements to Village IV. 12. Where required, a left turn pocket shall be constructed in the median. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 5 13. All public improvements shall conform to the Standards and Specification of the City of San Jacinto. 14. Prior to submittal of a Final Map application, submit a detailed hydrologic study to determine design storm flow rates and debris potential. A. Provide a proposal to adequately collect, convey and outlet storm flows with specific consideration made for debris loading and deposition onsite and offsite including: 1. Construction of a debris basin upstream of the golf course to be built concurrently with any channel or underground system. 2. Water flowing-onto-the-golf-eaur. -a-velocity of 5 fps. 2. Water flowing onto the golf course shall be non -eroding B. Provide a mechanism to maintain the drainage system. POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. Shrubs at street intersections shall not exceed 30 inches in height. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Prior to submittal of Final Map application, landscape and automatic water sensoring sprinkler system plans along Soboba Road shall be submitted for approval. J andscaping shall be compatible to that of Village IV. 2. Prior to submittal of final map application, landscape and sprinkler system plans for the common open space/park and typical front yards shall be submitted. 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit a soils report and grading plans shall be submitted for approval. 4. All applicable fees shall be paid at the time of the issuance of the building permit. 5. All utilities shall be underground. 6. DELETE A —parking area shall accommodate a minimum of 6 stalls irciuding wheel stops and be improved with 4 inches of dccompored granite. The parking area should be landscaped, time posted and -gated to prevent late night activities. -Aza easily accessible trail shall be provided PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 6 he -garde RT 7. Prior to approval of Final Map Application, applicable storm drain fee shall be paid. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall pay all school fees and participate in the formation and establishment of a community facilities district and the issuance of bonds thereby, and/or participate in other satisfactory alternative financing programs to finance educational facilities. 2. Prior to approval of a Final Map application, the developer shall dedicate land in conformance with the requirements of Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85, Amendment 1. 3. Tentative Tract 27402 shall comply with the conditions and intent of the approved Environmental Impact Report. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATING MONITORING 1. Developer shall provide a Declaration stating how all significant environmental concerns will be mitigated, prior to the recordation of a final map. 2. Upon the approval of the Declaration, it shall be noticed on the Final Map and recorded simultaneously. 3. Upon the start of construction, at six month intervals, and prior to occupancy the developer shall provide a status report relating to compliance with the mitigating measures. 4. Prior to occupancy, the City shall verify compliance with the mitigating measures. FIRE DEPARTMENT INCORPORA I E. HEREIN THE FIRE DEPARTMENTS CHECKLIST DATED 1-23-92 PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 PAGE NO. 7 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: T FF P T Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development March 17, 1992 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23729 (AMENDMENT #1) APPLICANT: RICE DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: NORT ST CO ' R OF SOBOBA ROAD AND LAKE PARK DRIVE (VILLAGE III). DESCR ION This is a proposal fo amend an approved 125-lot single family residential subdivision of 36 acres, including an 11.9 acre open space lot proposed for future condominiums The applicant is now proposing to increase the number of lots to 148, to increase the minimum lot area to 6,000 square feet and eliminate the 11.9 acre open space lot that was to be the future condominium project. The site is Village III of the Soboba Springs Specific Plan. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve Tentative Tract 23729 (Amendment #1) subject to the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval and determine that Tentative Tract 23729, Amendment 1, is consistent with the Program Environmental Impact Report certified for Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85, and that Tentative Tract 23729, Amendment 1 is consistent with Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85, Amendment 1. BACKGROUND On February 26, 1992, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the amended tentative tract map. The Planning Commission recommended the following changes to the Conditions of Approval, which are attached for your review: SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIREMENTS Block and/or stucco wall plans for Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive, consistent compatible with the existing block wall of Village IV, and fence plans shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. Proposed fencing in all other areas of the project shall be in substantial conformance to the fence regulations of Ordinance 340. All fencing and block and/or stucco walls shall be constructed prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy. PUBLIC WORKS Street lights shall be provided for all streets in and around the subdivision; e of reet light to be approved by tile Planning /Director. 2. Street trees shall be purchased from the City for planting. installed in accordance with City policy; landscaping along Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive shall have an automatic water sensoring sprinkler device installed. 7. Provide a fifteen ten400t landscape median with automatic water sensor sprinkling system on Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive. 9. * . ' 10. Reconstruct Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive to the center line if necessary. Construct a City Standard eight inch curb and gutter and where feasible, a nti meandering six foot sidewalk. tit ter ne 14. Prior to submittal of a Final Map application, submit a detailed hydrologic study to determine design storm flow rates and debris potential. Provide a proposal to adequately collect, convey and outlet storm flows with specific consideration made for debris loading and deposition onsite and offsite including: Construction of a debris basin upstream of the golf course to be built concurrently with any channel or underground system. 2. Water flowing onto the golf course shall not exceed a velocity of 5 fp be Itork-eroamg. B. Provide a mechanism to maintain the drainage system. POLICE DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS bilchor 5. Prior to approval of a Final Map application, the developer shall dedicate and improve 2.07 acres Of land for park facilities and bond for said imProvements. Prior. to 6c4aucY of the 75_th Obit,- the develoPer shall improve the parkfacilities subject to the requirements of Amended Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85. Prepared By: Timothy M. Hults Senior Planner Approved By: Brian Mc Nabb Director of Community Development Attachments: 1. Conditions of Approval as recommended by the Planning Commission. 2. Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 26, 1992. STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman Ver Plank and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development DATE: February 26, 1992 SUBJE : ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23729 (AMENDMENT #1) APPLICANT: RICE DEVELOPMENT 163 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 (714) 654-4454 ENGINEER: NBS/Lowry 1545 West Florida Avenue Hemet, CA 92344 (714) 658-7116 DESCRIPTION A proposal to amend an approved 125-lot single family residential subdivision, including an open space lot, to allow for a 148-lot single family residential subdivision with a 7.8 acre open space/park hiking trail located at the northwest corner of Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive (Main Street). EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT "B" EXHIBIT "C" EXHIBIT "D" EXHIBIT "E" EXHIBIT "F" EXHIBIT "G" NG COMMISSION BASE MAP EXISTING/PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN EXISTING ZONING EXISTING USES EXIS I ING CIRCULATION ELEMENT FLOOD ZONE SEISMIC ZONE FEBRUARY 26, 1991 PAGE NO. 1 BACKGROUND On February 15, 1989, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Tentative Tract 23729. Also considered and approved was R-2 Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay. On April 4, 1989, the City Council approved the R-2 PUD overlay and Tentative Tract 23729 for 125 single-family lots averaging approximately 4,500 square feet in area and an 11.9 acre open space lot for a future condominium project. The applicant is now proposing to increase the number of lots to 148, the increase the minimum lot area to 6,000 square feet and eliminate the 11.9 acre open space lot that was to be a future condominium project. The increase in lots prompted a reconfiguration of the subdivision as follows: 1. The Soboba Road entry to the development was originally located 450 feet northwest of Lake Park Drive (Main Street). The proposed entry is to be located approximately 1,150 feet northwest of Lake Park Drive (Main Street). 2. The interior circulation pattern maintains a single loop road with two points of access, one off Soboba Road and one off I ake Park Drive (Main Street). However, amended circulation system will provide seven cul-de-sacs oriented toward the interior open space, with landscaping and guest parking provided in the center of the bulb. The previous plan provided for only two cul-de- sacs, with only one oriented toward the open space. The applicant will provide landscaping in the open space area, along with a trail system linking with Village 6. Additionally, the applicant has provided a golf cart path linked with the golf course without entering either Soboba Road or T ake Park Drive (Main Street). ENVIRO NTAL ANALYSIS Pursuant to Section 15182 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, subdivisions that are consistent with and implementing an approved Specific Plan do not require preparation of an additional Environmental Impact Report or negative Declaration. However, pursuant to the approved Specific Plan the following impacts related to this site shall be mitigated: ING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1991 PAGE NO. 2 Public Facilities & Infrastructure Parks The Specific Plan requires the dedication and improvement 9.3 acres of park space. Tentative Tract 23729, Amendment 1, will be conditioned to comply with the amended Conceptual Specific Plan. Schools The Environmental Impact Report prepared for the original Specific Plan, contemplated formation of or participation in a Community Facilities District for mitigation of school impacts. Additionally, the City and the School District have since entered into a Cooperation Agreement which requires that all new developments participate in a financing district. This development and the related Specific Plan will be required to participate in a school mitigation financing district. Seismicity/Geology As previously considered in the Specific Plan EIR, the site is traversed by an active fault zone. The mitigation measures identified in the previous EIR require that no structures be permitted in the fault zone area plus a setback of 50 feet. To accommodate the fault zone, the map provides open space areas diagonally across the development and adjacent to Soboba Road. Furthermore, the Ell( requires that all structures be constructed in accordance with the earthquake standards of the Uniform Building Code. Additionally, the EIR recommended that foundation reinforcement be considered to minimize the potential for subsidence. The mitigation measures indicated above will included as conditions of Approval. Drainage Flood control impacts will be mitigated by the provision of grass lined channels on -site. The open space depicted on the map for the fault zone is also proposed for flood control facilities to convey water generated by this development as well as from Village VI across the golf course and into the levee. Water generated from Village VI will be conveyed diagonally across the development in a northwesterly direction from a pipe under Soboba Road and debris basin upstream in Village VI. The channel will be grass lined, landscaped and be utilized as a trail system. ING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1991 PAGE NO. 3 DISCUSSION The Conceptual Specific Plan contemplated a maximum of 9 dwelling units per acre for the subject site. The proposed amended tentative tract proposes a density of 4 dwelling units per acre, consistent with Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85. The current zoning for the property is "R-1" (Single -Family), which requires a minimum of 7,200 square foot lots. The amended map is proposing a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet, which will require that a Planned Unit Development overlay be approved prior to recordation of the final map. Proposed cul-de-sac street "H" exceeds 600' in length. The City's Subdivision Ordinance limits the length of cul-de-sacs to 600', unless approved by the City Council. Additionally, the developer proposes a 52 foot right-of-way for interior streets, but past practices have allowed the 52 foot right-of-way provided there is a 40 foot wide road bed. The site is currently vacant, has no vegetation and exhibits minimal relief as it slopes to the west at a rate of about 3 percent. Existing surrounding land uses consist of residential uses across Lake Park Drive (Main Street) and the golf course to the north and west. The potential for conflict is minimal, as the homes adjacent to the golf course will be designed and marketed to the golf course orientation. Potential issues regarding the development include maintenance of the open space areas and the financing and construction of the off -site improvements. The open space areas indicated above are proposed to accommodate the fault zone and flood control improvements. The developer proposes that these areas be dedicated to the City, instead of being privately maintained open space. If the City accepts the offer of dedication the City would be responsible for maintenance of the open space areas. Staff has conditioned the project to form or join the Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District (I J,MD) for the parkway landscape along Soboba Road and Lake park Drive. Additionally, the open space in Village IV will ultimately be maintained by the City through LLMD funds. If the Commission concurs, the proposed open space could be maintained by the LLMD. Off -site improvements related to the development of the Specific Plan and this development include the bridge across the levee and the fire station that was proposed to be located in Village II. The timing for the construction of the bridge is not changing as a result of this application or the application to amend the Specific Plan. The bridge is required to be constructed prior to occupancy of the 500th dwelling in the Specific Plan area. Financing for the bridge construction is derived from Redevelopment funds. Presently, the mechanism is in place for the tax increment funding to occur to allow construction of the bridge. However, construction of additional dwellings is necessary to allow for an increase in the tax increment to pay the projected debt service from the issuance of redevelopment bonds thereby. NG COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1991 PAGE NO. 4 The fire station is proposed to be relocated west of the levee so as to provide better service to a greater area of the City. The developer will be required to join CFD #3 for public safety purposes and pay the fire mitigation fee toward the cost of construction of the eastern fire station. COMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 92- recommending the City Council approve Tentative Tract 23729 (Amendment #1) subject to the Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval. Brian McNabb Director of Community Development ING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1991 PAGE NO. 5 IT 40 .111..An9 TOP, STREET SECTION - 60 R/W TOP, STREET SECTION - 52 R/W ^ • ."" " 4if P, a +0. AMENDED #1 TENTATIVE TRACT No. 23729 (VILLAGE 3) --// P.TLII 1., )1 ( A: 1,11, 1. • , 46, T L y:3 ATT., 111 , „,,,,, /tP',/..141,41 441 / )1, a* ,Ik. " ..7,,",',— '. •i.J.,,,,, ,:,;.:,:,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,t,,,74,1/2,',,,,,,,.„-A.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. ,,,,,,,, ,, NB , • 4,1,4 tO.112 \ [01.0.1,90 11111.3,.04 A01101. $0.1 440 TOP, STREET SECTION -100 R/W 7r) VICINITY MAP WM. PtVV0Z4S tio, "1 V-01 f TENTATIVE TR T No. 2 729 AMENDMENTS 6/44; N., 6E I4IPAI�N ....w,,,,A,r.....,Q,,-,' OWNER/APPLICANT RICE DEVELOPMENT ,63 E MAIN STREET SAN JACINTO, CA 92503 (7141654-44CA ASSESSORS PARCEL No.'S 433-120-023 433 -140 , 001 411 -140-030 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PORTION or pATTrF, s 1 n PITT PARCEL RAP No tiny. PER PUR 23/22-21. NEcoous OF RIVERSIDE COUNT) ACREAGE_ 36 As ± TOTAL LOT'A',,0 134C, LOT "D'T 2 TT AC, LOT"C• 3 DAC, LOT "D'T..14 AC , RESIDENT ,AL LOTS. 20 2 AC ZONING EXISTING: ti++ (Pool PROPOSED: R- I (Pool LAND USE. EXISTING: VACANT PROPOSED: SINGLE FAMILY NO. OF PROPOSED LOTS 140 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 4 OPEN SPACE LOTS VTILIT1E$ ELECTRIC: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON GAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS WATER' EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT SEWER: EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT TELEPHONE: GENERAL TELEPHONE TELEVISION: JONES' 1NTERCABLE GENERAL PLAN LOW DENSITY RES1OENT (AL OPEN SPACE / PARK AREA TO SE OELPEATE0 10 Eel y or SAN JACiNT ;ASSN S _. „2. ARNE 133 PO 451 /1•03.4.4 t.erst 97.3 GATE JAN '92 RV .T OE WO NOP 013 0E1 FILE No T 4 1E820 Exhibit A Base Map Tentative Tract Map 23729 Vacant Existing SgI. Farn. Res. San Jacinto River Vacant Vacant ake Park Drive Soboba Road Indian Reservation 1" = 1000' Soboda Springs Low Density Residential Open Space Low Density Residential Open Space Low Density Residential Existing & Proposed Exhibit B Existing and Proposed General Plan Tentative Tract Map 2 3 7 2 9 Low Density Residential Commercial Low Density Residential Hillside Hillside Lake Park Drive Low Density Residential Soboba Road 1" = 1000' Soboba Springs Vacant San Jacinto River W - 2 R - 1 PUD 11 u I ac Exhibit C Existing Zoning Tentative Tract Map 23729 Existing SgI. Fam. Res. R - 1 San Jacinto River W - 2 Vacant Vacant Lake Park Drive Soboba Road Indian Reservation 1" = 1000' Soboba Springs —) Vacant San Jacinto River Vacant Exhibit D Existing Uses Tentative Tract Map 2 3 7 2 9 San Jacinto River Existing Sgl. Fam. Res. Vacant Vacant Lake Park Drive Indian Reservation Soboba Road 1" = 1000' Soboba Springs Exhibit E Existing Circulation Element Tentative Tract Map 23729 Vacant Existing SgI. Fam. Res. San Jacinto River Village 1 Vacant Vacant Lake Park Drive 88' Right of Way Secondary Hwy. Vacant Soboba Road 88' Right of Way Secondary Hwy. Indian Reservation 1" = 1000' Soboba Springs Vacant Golf tour: Existing Exhibit F Flood Zone Tentative Tract Map 2 37 2 9 Existing SgI. Fam. Res. Village 4 Existing Sgl. Fam. Res. Village 3 TTM 23729 R-1 PUD Village 2 TTM24217 Existing Mobilehome Park Village 6 TTM 27402 R-1 PUD Vacant Vacant Vacant Lake Park Drive 88' Right of Way Secondary Hwy. Soboba Road 88' Right of Way Secondary Hwy. Indian Reservation 1" = 1000' Soboba Springs Exhibit G Seismic Zone Tentative Tract Map 2 3 72 9 Vacant Vacant Village 4 Existing Sgl. Fam. Res. San Jacinto River Vi Note : A Seismic study has been performed on - site pursuant to the Soboba Springs Master Plan Environmental Impact Report prepared by Ultrasystems Incorporated, dated May of 1986. Existing Sgl. Fam. Res. Existing Mobilehome Park Vacant 27402 Lake Park Drive Vacant Soboba Road Indian Reservation Fi©T 1" = 1000' Soboba Springs FINDINGS OF FACT TENTATIVE T1 CT 23729, D. 1, VILLAGE 3 AS APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1992 Tentative Tract 23729, Amendment 1, is consistent with the approved Conceptual Master Plan 1-85, Amendment 1. 2. The density is within the General Plan Density and Zoning Density specified by the Plan. Tentative Tract Map 23729, Amendment 1, as conditioned is in substantial compliance with the City's Subdivision and Zoning Ordinances. 4. A mapped seismic special studies zone dissects the subject site. Mitigation measures would be that no structures be permitted in the fault zone area plus a setback of 50 feet. To accommodate the fault zone, the map provides open space areas diagonally across the development and adjacent to Soboba Road. Furthermore, all structures shall be constructed in accordance with the earthquake standards of the Uniform Building Code. Additionally, it is recommended that foundation reinforcement be considered to minimize the potential for subsidence. The mitigation measures indicated above will included as conditions of Approval. 5. There are adequate sewer and water facilities to serve the site provided proper extensions are made. 6. The San Jacinto Valley has been known in the past to be a habitat for the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat. 7. Tentative Tract 23729, Amendment 1, complies with the conditions and intent of the approved Environmental Impact Report. 8. The project will impact the ability for the school district to provide adequate educational facilities. Recently, the City and the School District entered into a Cooperation Agreement which requires that all new developments participate in a financing district. This development will be required to participate in a school mitigation financing district. 9. The project will generate a need for improved flood control facilities. Flood control impacts will be mitigated by the provision of grass lined channels on -site to convey water generated by this development across the golf course and into the levee. 10. Tentative Tract 23729, Amendment 1, shall conform to the park dedication requirements of Amended Conceptual Specific Plan 1-85. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1991 PAGE NO. 1 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPECIFIC PLAN REQUIREMENTS The following conditions are required: 1 The developer shall submit CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, AND RESTRICTIONS including but not limited to the following provisions: A. CC&R's shall include a provision prohibiting recreational vehicle parking within Tract 23729. B. CC&R's shall have a notification to property owners indicating the maximum lot coverage of any lot shall not exceed 50%. Lot coverage shall include any structure whether portable, temporary, or permanent, as well as driveway areas. C. CC&R's shall require live landscaping in the front yard on each lot. D. CC&R's shall state the maximum width of a driveway is the width of the garage. E. The CC&R's shall prohibit the construction of any antenna, satellite dish or air conditioner on the roof. Antennas shall not exceed the lowest eave height. 2. Prior to submittal of a Final Map Application, a PUD application, accompanied by a Master Plan for Village III, shall be submitted. All land in the PUD Overlay District shall be held in one ownership or under unified control or have the written consent or agreement of all owners of property proposed for inclusion in the PUD Overlay District. B. The Development Plan shall be submitted setting forth the following: The exact boundaries and legal description of the property to be developed. 2. All proposed improvements that are to be constructed on the land and their precise locations. Common open space showing size, grades, and function upon completion. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1991 PAGE NO. 2 3. 4. The location and dimension of all off street parking facilities, public and private. 5. A tabulation of the percentage of total building coverage of the development. 6. A tabulation of densities within the project. C. Development plans shall also include but not limited to the following: 1 Building elevations. 2. Floor plans, unit size in square feet, and the amount of private open space in square feet. 3. Detailed landscaping plans. 4. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the developer shall submit to the Community Development Department a specific plot plan indicating which elevations and floor plans shall be placed on each lot. Such submission shall be in substantial conformance to the plans on file, approved by the City. block wall of Village IV, and fence plans shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit. Proposed fencing in all other areas of the project shall be in block walls shall rto iyuanc fencing und certificate 11p40. 11 he constructe 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall establish or join a Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District. PUBLIC WORKS PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1991 PAGE NO. 3 Street lights shall 1 provided for all streets in and around the subdivision pe of street hght to be approved by Planning 2, S-treet trees shall b rk Drive shall have an automatic water sensorir device installed. 2. Street trees shall be installed in accordance with.Ciik policy; landscaping along Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive shaR have ar autonatic wtterseisorbigspriukler device jnsJjed: Appropriate dedication shall be given along Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive. 4. Curbs, gutters, sidewalks and handicap ramps shall be installed per City Standards and Specifications. 5. Interior streets shall have a minimum 40 feet of paving curb to curb. 6. Street striping and traffic sign plans shall be submitted for approval. 7. Provide a fifteen foot landscape median with automatic water sensor sprinkling system on Soboba Road and I ake Park Drive. 7. Provide a ten -foot landscape median with automatic water sensor sprinkling system on Soboba Road and Lake Park Drive. 8. Entrances to Village III shall have a raised divided planter set back a minimum of 35 feet. 9. A handicap -ra 9. arThkaea 1i.11be esi1e LU UTC . 10. 10. Construct a City Standard eight inch curb and gutter and wh Drive tandard curb and gutter and where feasible., a meanderrng sixfoot ieigbt to be determined by dramage euirements 11. The public improvements on Soboba Road shall be consistent with the improvements to Village IV and on Lake Park Drive with the improvements to Village I. NG COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1991 PAGE NO. 4 12. Where required, a left turn pocket shall be constructed in the median. 13. All public improvements shall conform to the Standards and Specification of the City of San Jacinto. 14. Prior to submittal of a Final Map application, submit a detailed hydrologic study to determine design storm flow rates and debris potential. A. Provide a proposal to adequately collect, convey and outlet storm flows with specific consideration made for debris loading and deposition onsite and offsite including: Construction of a debris basin upstream of the golf course to be built concurrently with any channel or underground system. 2. urse shall not exceed a N,elocity of 5 fps. 2. Water flowing onto the golf course shall be non.,erodin B. Provide a mechanism to maintain the drainage system. POLICE DEPARTMENT Delete way the golf earts will bc taking from t mobile home park to Village IV. 2. Shrubs at street intersections shall not exceed 30 inches in height. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Prior to submittal of Final Map application, landscape and automatic water sensoring sprinkler system plans along T nice Park Drive and Soboba Road shall be submitted for approval. Landscaping shall be compatible to that of Village IV. 2. Prior to submittal of final map application, landscape and sprinkler system plans for the common open space/park and typical front yards shall be submitted. Prior to issuance of a grading permit a soils report and grading plans shall be submitted for approval. 4. All applicable fees shall be paid at the time of the issuance of the building permit. 5. All utilities shall be underground. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1991 PAGE NO. 5 6. Traffic Signal Mitigation fees, applicable at the time the final map application, shall be paid prior to the recordation of the Final Map. 7. Prior to submittal of a grading plan for review, a Stephen's Kangaroo Rat survey shall be conducted and submitted for review. 8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the development shall participate in the formation of a community facilities district or annex into CFD #1 and CFD #3 for the construction of off -site improvements and for public safety purposes. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDI I IONS 1 All structures shall be setback 50 feet from the fault zone area. 2. All structures be constructed in accordance with the earthquake standards of the Uniform Building Code. If determined necessary by the soils report, foundation reinforcement shall be required to minimize the potential for subsidence. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall pay all school fees and participate in the formation and establishment of a community facilities district and the issuance of bonds thereby, and/or participate in other satisfactory alternative financing programs to finance educational facilities. 5. improv and for park facilities subject to the requirements of Amend-d Conceptual 5. P1 or to - application, developer sa edicate nd rov for aid improvernel 1.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATING MONITORING Developer shall provide a Declaration stating how all significant environmental concerns will be mitigated, prior to the recordation of a final map. 2. Upon the approval of the Declaration, it shall be noticed on the Final Map and recorded simultaneously. 3. Upon the start of construction, at six month intervals, and prior to occupancy the PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1991 PAGE NO. 6 developer shall provide a status report relating to compliance with the mitigating measures. 4. Prior to occupancy, the City shall verify compliance with the mitigating measures. PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 1991 PAGE NO. 7 March 17, 1992 To: Via: STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and City Council Pamela S. Easter, City Manager From: Joseph M. Kozma, Chief of Police Dave Anderson, Assistant to the City Subject: Alternate work schedule for police patrol officers -(7. Recommendation: Approve amendment to Police Memorandum of Understanding authorizing an alternate work schedule for police patrol officers for a trial period between March 26, 1992 and January 15, 1993. Fiscal Impact: It is estimated that this proposal could eliminate most overtime requirements, except for emergencies and special operations, resulting in a reduction of approximately $75,000 in overtime per year. The cost of additional hours for sergeants under this plan is $8,998. Therefore net savings under this plan are estimated at $66,000 per year. Background: In the existing Police MOU, the City agreed to conduct a feasibility study, during this fiscal year, with respect to the implementation of a modified work schedule in the police department. Since the signing of the MOU, the police department has investigated several modified work schedules. One modified work schedule in particular appears to stand out with many positive features, and few negatives. This plan is known as the "12-Hour" Plan and is described below: Police patrol officers will be divided up into four "Teams" consisting of one sergeant, and three patrol officers. Each team will work the same schedule for a period of six months. Each team will work 14 days in each 28 day period. As a practical matter, this means that one week, patrol officers will work 12 hour shifts for three consecutive days, and four in the next. Normally, patrol officers would accrue 84 hours in a pay period using this formula: However, the association has agreed that the shift supervisor will reduce by two hours the time worked by each officer each week, as a normal part of the schedule. The association has further agreed that the city may shift an officer's schedule to accommodate court appearances, so as to reduce overtime. If approved, the "12 Hour Plan" will go into effect on March 26, 1992, and will be evaluated in January of 1993. The effect of this plan will be to increase police patrol strength to the level of three patrol officers on duty at all times, supported by a sergeant acting as a shift supervisor. Current patrol strength now fluxuates between two and four officers on duty at any given time. Further, because of the deployment of three officers, and the shift supervisor's flexibility in rearranging the schedule of individual officers, overtime will become more of the exception rather than the rule. Overtime, this year alone, prior to the implementation of this plan, has cost the City approximately $110,405. Sick leave usage is also projected to drop, as the officers will be concentrating their work schedule and will have more time off. Additionally, the association has agreed to accrue sick and vacation leave at current rates. Attached, are the modified sections of the amended Police MOU from our personnel attorney, Richard Kreisler. Richard has reviewed all terms and conditions of the agreement including management and supervisory obligations required to make the "12-Hour Plan" work, for conformance to all relevant personnel law, Fair Labor Standards, Police Memorandum of Understanding, and relevant City Personnel Rules and Regulations. The amended Police MOU commits the City to study a modified work schedule for other job classifications within the police department, in the near future. AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA SAN JACINTO POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 'This AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CA AND SAN JACINTO POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION is entered into between the City of San Jacinto (hereinafter "City") and the San Jacinto Police Officers Association (hereinafter "Association"), pursuant to the provisions of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act and the provisions of Article 12.1 of the present MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING between the parties, effective for the period from July 1, 1991 through and including June 30, 1992. Pursuant to Article 12.1 of the MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING, the City and the Association do agree to amend said MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING as follows (references are to existing MOU Articles): 6,1 Sick Leaves a. Full-time unit members shall accrue sick leave at the rate of one (1) day eight ( Ours per month, beginning with the first day of employment. Unit members hired between the first and fifteenth day of the month shall be credited with one full day's eigh(8)thOur!5 sick leave for the month of hire; unit members hired between the sixteenth and the last day of the month shall begin to accrue sick leave on the first day of the following month. Sick leave may accrue up to a maximum of 120 days9O bours per unit member. g. Sick Leave Incentive: Retroactive to January 1, 1987, the City is implementing an incentive program to reduce sick leave abuse. To qualify, a unit member must have 192 hours of accumulated sick leave on record as of January 1, 1987 (and/or as of January 1 of each succeeding year in order to qualify for such succeeding year). Once qualified, a unit member may sell up to . - • forty-eight NYlitiirs of sick leave back to the City if, as of the date of November 1.51" following the qualification date, the unit member used f013t70g4(4$):Prf00fi4i(r4itfilicb470,010. tifx,4t8h;71.1uoti7t the year following the qualification date, more than ;ix (6) days hours are used, no buy back is available. A qualified unit member s option to exercise this buy- back shall be exercised on the 15`" day of November (if the 15th of November falls on a weekend, then the option shall be exercisable on the following Monday) with payment to be made the first pay period in December. 6.2 Vacations: Full time unit members shall accumulate vacation leave in accordance with the following schedule: a. During the first three (3) years of service, unit members shall accrue ten (101 pli40,000**.per annum. Unit members shall be eligible to take vacation leave after serving one (1) full year with the City. Under extraordinary circumstances the City may, in its discretion, permit a unit member to take vacation days prior to completion of one (1) year of service with the City. In the fourth (4') through sixth (6") years of service, unit members shall accrue ..,:Lte4#§170MN*.OY*10*-2, per annum. In the seventh (7") through tenth (iv ) years of service, unit members shall accrue eighteen (18) vacation days 00:#4,:WiiYfixiV40;41.4444%***4:4t* per annum. After ten (10) full years of service, unit_ members shall accrue ):*****Wper annum. The accrual schedule set forth above shall be effective as of January 1, 1988. ARTICLE 8 WORKING HOURS AND OVERTIME 8.1 Each atfected woru employee acehoesworn"-.- -.liO '..64:*oi..1 06.-0. .. •....,,,,,,,, ... described hek,b.- :'iiigil?10-:1P,Y* ' ,'..i ule,shall be in actual attendance on duty for a minimum of eight 8 twive i2 hours on each day that the employee is assigned to work. Each such eight (8) hour tweve ) period on duty shall constitute one (1) work day. Said eith-t-(-8)1**02,yhour period shall include a thirty (30) minute lunch period and two (2) breaks of tcn (10) minutes duration, 8.2 All sworn employees except'those tiVik ,0011:5fc W9-...,.' . §40crib'ed. ,., ,R, ), ,, 2, below ; AS ..1$ei:4:00- _ , ,,,1?11010,#Or:Ice.ar ,..,. alternative .....- ..s all be regularly . ,.:41,41P: - scheduled to work tvo-e-myk-44.1-qiO3.0 days in each twenty-eight (28) day work period (see Article 8.3) and subject to the needs of the department shall regularly he provided eight (8)fourteen (14) scheduled days off during each twenty-eight (28) day work :00..iO4 subject to the needs of the department, Pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, 0#(employees are entitled to overtime at one and one-half (1-1/2) times their regular rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of -2- ILL HU. one hundred -seventy-one (171) in the stated twenty-eight (28) day work period - see Articles 8.3 and 8.4 regarding "time not considered as time worked." Non -sworn employees are entitled to FLSA overtime for the time worked in excess of forty (40) hours in a seven (7) day work period. However, the City shall also provide the following overtime benefits that shall be credited against required FLSA overtime payments. Said overtime program is as follows: All sworn,':employees k4:406.1bijgObititaitillj41 fourteen' " c.,y2 ; wry;-00,.(0,97i*w0Fiji#1441:14:# *41i in excess of - • hours during any seven (7) flzigtoeg441consecutive day work period as designated by the City, shall be entitled to overtime payments equivalent to one and one- half times the employee 's hourly rate (as opposed to "regular rate" as mandated by the FLSA). ivempsch In addition, and only as >A.), regards this non-FLSA overtime program, "time worked", shall include as an eight (8) hour period of time, holidays described in Article VII of this MOU. Nonetheless, and in determining any overtime amounts due the employee pursuant to the FLSA, neither such holiday hours or any other paid leaves of absence, shall he considered "time worked." (See Article 8.4). 8.5 Modified Work Schedule: nts of P —Oa the City agrees to conduct a feasibility study with respect to the implementation of a modified work schedule in the police department. On completion of the study, the City shall make the study available to the Association. Upon request of the Association the City will meet and discuss the results and recommendations of the study. These meetings are not to be characterized as "meet and confer" or "meet and consult" within the meaning of Government Code Sections 3500 et. seq. The decision to implement any modified work schedule is at the sole discretion of the Chief of Police and the City Manager. If implemented, the modified work schedule may he revoked at any time by the City. Any modified work schedule shall not be considered a vested right or benefit and the City has no obligation to "meet and confer" or "meet and consult" prior to revocation. Any revocation shall not be subject to any internal grievance or appeal process or court action. RMK/jj/aanjacinio/amcndmcnt To: Honorable Mayor & Council Members via City Manager From: Chief of Police Date: March 9, 1992 Subject: Change to Animal Control Ordinance Concerning Use of Public Parks COMME JATION: Introduce Ordinance No. and Waive the Reading in Full. CO S: Section 8, Paragraph E, of Ordinance Number 913 is recommended for amendment as a result of the Parks Ordinance being introduced. Ordinance 913 would have been in conflict with the Parks Ordinance and rather than have controls in each Ordinance it is recommended that the Animal Control Ordinance be the controlling law for any animal requirements within the city. ORDINANCE NO. AN oaozNxuxoE aomozArzmo THE oWmEnaozr, LzoEmozmo, VACCINATION, ComrmoL, IMeonumDMomr, RETURN roOWNER, Aooprzom, EUTHANASIA, AND DISPOSAL orANIMALS, FOWL, AND OTHER mom-an»mN aeoczEg wzrozm THE Czrr or SAm zAozmTo. THE CITY 000moIL OF THE ozrY OF oxmv JAozmTo 000a HoRoor ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Title 6 of the Municipal code of the City of San Jacinto in its entirety is hereby zepealed' Section o. Definitions. whenever in this ordinance the following terms are used, they shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them in this section. &' Altered - For a female means having had the ovaries and uterus surgically removed; ovariobystezeotomy. For a male means having had the testicles surgically removed. B. Animal - Every non -human species of animal, both domestic and wild' C. AnimalContzolofficer- Ioany person employed by the City whose primary duty is the enforcement of laws of the State and City pertaining to animals and whose authority is vested under California Penal code Sections 830'9 and 836.5 and section lS'A of this ordinance. For the purpose of this ordinance, &oO shall mean Animal Control officer. D. Animal Shelter - Any facility operated by a Humane Society, or municipal agency or its authorized agents, for the purpose of impounding animals under the authority of this ordinance or state law for care, confinement, return to owner, adoption, or euthanasia. E. at Large - Being on any property without permission of the person who owns or has the right to possess or use the property; or unrestrained by a leash on either public property, unless expressly permitted by law, or private property open to the public; or anyplace or manner which presents substantial risk of imminent interference with animal or public health, safety or welfare. F. Auction - Any place where animals are bought, sold, or traded. G. Aviary - any cage or enclosure where birds are kept or maintained for breeding, display, exhibition, amusement, and/or for commercial use. H. Boarding Stable - Any place where privately owned bozoeo or ponies are provided zoom and board for commercial puzpooe, I. oat - Domesticated members of the species Felio oatoo; it excludes other members of the family Felidae' J. Chief of Police - Shall mean the chief law enforcement officer of the city' K. circus - & commercial variety show which may feature animal acts for public entertainment. L. city - Shall mean the City of San Jacinto. M. County - Shall mean the county of Riverside. N. Curb - To so restrain or control an animal so that it urinates or defecates only in street gutters. o' Dangerous Animal - Any animal of a species or type likely to cause injury to a person, or any animal which has demonstrated a propensity to attack or cause injury to a person. P, ooq - Domesticated members of the species Canis familiario/ it excludes other members of the family canidae. Q. Dog or oat Show - Any place where a collection of different or all one breed of dogs or cats are being exhibited and judged' D Enclosure - A fence or structure of at least six feet (*') in height, forming or causing an enclosure to confine a vicious dog in conjunction with other measures which may be taken by the owner or keeper, such as tethering of the vicious dog. Such enclosure shall be securely enclosed and looked and designed with secure sides, top and bottom and shall be designed to prevent the animal from escaping' S. Fowl - Includes male and female chicken, duck, goose, peacock, turkey, and pheasant. T. Groomino Shop - A commercial establishment where animals are bathed, clipped, plucked, or otherwise groomed' U. Guard (sentry) Doo - Any dog utilized on a commercial basis toguard any property including guarding against fire or theft or both. V. Impounded Animal - Any animal taken into custody by the 8Co or Police officer' W. Kennel - Any property where three (z) or more dogs, or three (z) or more cats, over the age of four (4) months, are kept or maintained. The term "kennel" shall not include any animal shelter operated by a Humane Society, anmnioipal agency, or its authorized agents, or a veterinary hospital operated by aveterinarian licensed by the State. X. Kennel operator - Any person who owns, controls, or operates a kennel or any person who is responsible for or who participates in the control of the operation of a kennel. Y. Leash -Anyrope, leather strap, chain orother material not exceeding six feet (s') in length, being held in the hand of a person capable of controlling and actually controlling the animal to which it is attached. Z. License Taq - Any indioa of durable material inscribed with certain required information, which has been issued by the City' A&. Licensed Doc[ - & dog wearing its current City or county (in case of newly annexed territory) license as required by this ordinance. B8, Liverr Stable - Any place where horses and carriages are kept for hire. Cc' Livestock - Any bovine, horse, mule, burro, sheep, goat, or swine. DD. Motion Picture, Television, and Theatrical - Any place where one or more animals are used in any motion picture, television, or theatrical performance or production, whether for entertainment, instruction, or advertising. EE, owner - any person who is the legal owner, keeper, harborer, possessor, or the actual custodian of an animal' ownership is also established by a person registering as the owner on a license application or other legal document or by a person claiming ownership and taking possession of an animal, or one who has control and custody of any animal for fifteen consecutive days, except an Animal Shelter or aneterinarian licensed by the state who has in his possession any animal for the purpose of treatment. FF. Performinq Animal Exhibition - Any spectacle, display, act, or event, other than circuses, in which performing animals are used. GG. Pet or Companion Animal - Any animal kept for pleasure rather than utility; an animal of a species that has been bred and raised to live in or about the habitation of humans and is dependent on people for food and shelter. HH. Pet License/Rabies Certificate - A properly completed certificate issued by the City which indicates: 1. License tag number; 2. Type, lot number, and manufacturer of the rabies vaccine; 3. The name of the veterinarian who vaccinated the dog/cat; 4. Date and expiration of the vaccination; 5. Date of issue and expiration of the pet license; 6. The cost of the license; 7. The pet's name and description, including breed, color, sex, and age; 8. The pet owner's name, address, and telephone number. II. Pet Shop - Any premises primarily used for the sale of household pets and which exists within proper zoning. JJ. Police Officer - Any person employed by the City whose primary duty is enforcement of laws of the State and City and whose authority is vested under Part 2, Title 3, Chapter 4.5 of the California Penal Code. KK. Pony Ride Any place where shetland and other small breeds of ponies are rented out by the ride. LL. Public Nuisance - Any animal or animals that unreasonably annoy humans, endanger the life or health of other animals or persons, or substantially interfere with the rights of citizens, other than their owners, to enjoyment of life or property. The term "public nuisance animal" shall mean and include, but is not limited to, any animal that; 1. Is repeatedly found at large; 2. Damages the property of anyone other than its owner; 3. Intimidates pedestrians or passersby; 4. Chases vehicles; 5. Excessively makes disturbing noises, including, but not limited to, continued and repeated howling, barking, whining, or other utterances, causing unreasonable annoyance, disturbance, or discomfort to a neighbor or others in close proximity where the animal is kept or harbored; 6. Attacks other domestic animals; or 7. Has been found by the Chief of Police or his designee, after notice to its owner and a hearing, to be a public nuisance animal by virtue of being a menace to the public health, welfare, or safety. MN . Quarantine - The isolation of any animal in a substantial enclosure so that such animal cannot be subject to contact with other animals or unauthorized persons. NN. Restraint - Secured by a leash or lead under the control of a responsible person and obedient to that person's commands or within the real property limits of its owner by means of a fence, wall, or chain. 00. Riding School or Stable - Any place that has available for hire, boarding, and/or riding instruction, any horse, pony, donkey, mule, or burro. PP. Rodeo - A contest, exhibition or competition of the skill of contestants or entrants in horsemanship, and where lassoing is usually performed involving cattle, horses, bulls, goats, and wild cows for public entertainment. OO. Stray - An animal which is at large. RR. Vaccination - The inoculation of an animal with a rabies vaccine approved by the State Department of Health Services for use in California. so. veterinary Hospital - Any establishment maintained and operated by a state licensed veterinarian for surgery, diagnosis, and treatment of disease or injuries of animals. TT. Vicious Animal - any animal which bites or attempts to bite any human or animal without provocation, or which has a disposition of propensity to attack, bite, or menace any human or animal without provocation and endangers the health and safety of any person. Any animal who bites or attempts to bite a person or animal that is unlawfully on its owner's property, or qbiob has been teased or provoked, or which is otherwise performing its duties as a police dog, shall not be deemed a vicious animal. oD. Wild Animal - Any animal which is not normally domesticated in the United States including, but not limited to, any lion, tiger, bear, non -human primate, wolf, cougar, ocelot, wild cat, skunk, racoon, opossum, ferret, venomous reptile, boa, python, anaconda, member of the Order crocadilia, or other such animal (farae naturae) irrespective of its actual or asserted state of docility, tameness, or domesticity. VV. Zones - Divisions of the city that classify, regulate, restrict, and segregate the uses of lands and buildings in designated areas. WW. Zoos - Any place where a collection of wild animals or wild and domesticated animals are kept or maintained for exhibition or for view by the public. XX^' In addition to the definitions set forth in this section, all definitions of words and phrases set forth in the California Humane Laws Handbook are hereby incorporated in this ordinance as though set forth in full herein. Section 3. Fees. ` A. Fees shall becharged and collected by the City for pet licensing, animal control services, and eoforoemeut' Such fees shall be established by the City Council by resolution. B. A list of currently approved fees shall be filed with the city clerk and shall be available for public inspection. mantimo «. Babies Control. A. Vaccination Required. Dog owners shall obtain a rabies vaccination for each dog they own, keep,' harbor, or have custody of, within thirty (30) days after it becomes four (4) months of age, or within thirty (sn) days after obtaining any dog over four <4> months of age, It shall be unlawful for any person to own, keep, harbor, or possess or to have in his or her care, charge, or custody, any dog five (5) months of age or older unless such has a current and valid rabies vaccination administered by any duly licensed veterinarian, with a rabies vaccine approved by the State Department of Health services for use in dogs. Such vaccination shall be repeated at intervals specified by the State Department of Health Services in order to maintain adequate immunity. ` B. Vaccination Clinic. The city shall `provide oz arrange for a rabies clinic at a specified location where dog owners may obtain the required rabies vaccination at a reduced fee in accordance with California Health and Safety Code' C, Exemption from Rabies Vaccination. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, a dog need not be vaccinated for rabies due to illness, age, or other disability if a licensed veterinarian has examined the dog and certified in writing that such vaccination should be postponed because of specified reaaooa' Exemption from vaccination does not exempt a dog from licensing zeguizemeota' D. Certificate Required Generally. Every person keeping, harboring, or having in the city any dog required by ordinance tobevaccinated shall at all times have in his/her possession a certificate issued by a person licensed by the State of California, or any other state or nation to practice veterinary medicine and vaccinated in accordance with the provisions of this section, or that such dog should not be vaccinated by reason of age, infirmity, or other disability. E. Certificate Required for Lioeoaimq' No dog may be licensed and no license certificate issued except upon presentation of a certificate by a veterinarian as provided for in this section. F. Animals Possibly Exposed toRabies. Any animal of a species subject to rabies which has been bitten by or has come in contact with an animal infected with or reasonably suspected of being infected with rabies shall be quarantined in strict confinement in a place and manner approved bythe ACO for aperiod of six (s) months in accordance with the California Administrative code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following alternative is permitted in the case of dogs and cats' If the dogor oat has been vaccinated against rabies at least thirty (30) days prior to the suspected exposure with a type of vaccine and within the time period approved by the State Department of Health Services, the dog or cat may be revaooioated immediately (within 48 hours) and quarantined in strict confinement in a place and manner approved by the AcO for a period of thirty (30) days following revaccination. G. quarantine of oitioct Aoimals' l, When any animal subject to quarantine has bitten, scratched, or otherwise exposed any person tothe possible infection of rabies, the owner shall upon verbal or written order from the ACV or any Police Officer, quarantine such animal in strict confinement in a place and manner approved by the Aco or Police officer for at least fourteen (14) days, (dogs and oats ten [lO] days) and shall permit the ACoto inspect or examine the animal at any time during the period in accordance with the California Administrative Code' 3' Upon the issuance of a verbal or written order of quarantine, the person to whom such order is directed shall permit the ACO to post a written or printed notice of the quarantine order upon or about the premises wherein the subject animal is confined. 3. No person shall obscure, deface, render illegible, or remove the posted sign during the quarantine period' 4. In the event the owner of the animal refuses or fails to quarantine the animal, the owner shall upon the request of the ACO or any Police officer deliver the animal to the AcO or Police Officer to be quarantined at a designated location for at least fourteen (14) days, (dogs and oats ten [lV] days). 5. Dogs and cats which have been quarantined in strict confinement under proper care and under observation of a licensed veterinarian, in an animal shelter, veterinary hospital, or other adequate facility in a manner approved by the Animal Control Department, may be released from quarantine by the Department of Animal Control after five (5) days of veterinary observation if upon conducting a thorough examination on the fifth day or more after the infliction of bite, the observing veterinarian certifies that there are no clinical signs or symptoms of any disease. H. Payment of Fees and Expenses. The owner of any animal quarantined under the provisions of this section at the Animal Shelter shall pay all fees and expenses related to the quarantine. I. Destruction of Infected Animals. If it appears to the ACO, Veterinarian, or Animal Shelter Director upon examination or otherwise of an animal that such animal has rabies, he/she may authorize with permission of the owner if known the euthanasia of said animal for the purpose of laboratory examination. Section 5. Pet License and License Tag. A. License Required. 1. All dog owners, except tourists or visitors who stay less than thirty (30) days, shall apply for and obtain a separate dog license for each dog they own, possess, keep, or harbor after it is four (4) months of age. All dog owners must possess such license at the time the dog is five (5) months of age or thirty (30) days after obtaining or bringing into the city any dog over four (4) months of age. 2. Any dog which is legally impounded according to the provisions of this ordinance shall be presumed to be a dog which, prior to impounding, required a license, regardless of such dog's actual age or owner's place of residence. 3. Upon presentation by the dog owner of a rabies certificate that is valid throughout the license period, and payment of the license fee, and if applicable, a late fee, the City shall issue a pet license and license tag. The dog owner shall retain the pet license for inspection by any person charged with the enforcement of this ordinance. 4. A pet license shall be effective until the first day of January following issuance and shall be renewed within thirty (30) days after each January 1st. Every dog attaining the age of four (4) months shall immediately be subject to all provisions of this section. If the application for a license is made more than thirty (30) days after the date such license is required, the applicant shall pay an additional late fee. 5. The city council, by resolution, may establish a licensing period not to exceed three years for dogs that have reached the age of twelve months, or older, and have been vaccinated against rabies. The person to whom the license issued pursuant to this subsection may choose a license period established by the city council of up to one, two, or three years. When issuing a license pursuant to this subsection, the license period shall not extend beyond the remaining period of validity for the current rabies vaccination. Each license will be renewed within thirty (30) days of the expiration date to avoid a late fee. B. Exemption. No fee shall be required for certified seeing eye dogs, hearing dogs, or certified dogs that are trained to assist the physically handicapped or governmental police dogs. C. License Tags. z' With each license for an individual dog, there shall be issued and delivered to the Dezaoo securing the license, a metal tag with the serial number of the license and the year for which it is issued. o. & duplicate of a loot tag may be procured upon presentation of the original license and the payment of a prescribed fee, 3' The dog owner shall securely affix the current license tag to the collar or harness of the dog for which the license tag was issued and shall ensure the dog wears such license tag at all times except while such dog remains indoors. 4' The license tag issued for one dog shall not be transferred or attached to any other dog. 5' No person shall remove a license tag from the collar or harness or remove the collar or harness bearing such tag from a dog' 6. moperson shall counterfeit oz imitate any license tag issued pursuant to this section, attach a counterfeit or imitation tag to any dog, or possess any such counterfeit tag. D. Annexed Territory - coontr License Acceptable. Licensing shall not be required for a person who is a resident of an area at the time the area is annexed to the city and who, at such time, owns or has in his/her custody or control a dog for which a license fee has been paid and a dog license issued under ordinances of the County. All persons shall be subject to all provisions of Section 5,C whether a county or city license is iasued. E. cat Licensing. The owner of any oat, may upon submission of proof of rabies vaccination certified by a licensed veterinarian and upon payment of the fee established by resolution of the city Council, be issued a license and tag. No person shall remove a tag from a cat without the consent of the owner. A license shall be effective until the first day of January following issuance. The obtaining of such license shall be optional on the part of the cat owner. Section 6, Shelters. A. Establishment otCity Shelters. The city shall maintain or provide for the maintenance of a shelter system and rabies control program in accordance with California Health and Safety Code for the purpose of carrying out and enforcing the provisions of this ordinance. B. Aqreemeot with Certain Persons to operate Shelter, License Animals, Etc., Authorized. The city council may enter into a written agreement or written agreements with any veterinarian licensed by the State, or any organized humane society or similar association, which will undertake the provisions of all or a portion of this ordinance. Any such veterinarian, society, or association which shall enter into an agreement shall carry out all provisions of this ordinance being the subject of such agreement or agreements in the manner herein prescribed. Section 7. Kennels. A. Planning Commission Approval Dec[uired. No kennel shall be established ozmaintained within the city unless the appropriate zoning is established in accordance with the City of San Jacinto Zoning Ordinance. The planning commission shall not issue such consent other than through the procedures an established in the zoning regulations of the city. The planning commission shall have the authority to limit and restrict any consent in any *ay that the commission deems necessary under the circumstances with regard to location, neighborhood, and proper planning. Any such consent shall be revocable at any time bythe planning commission for cause at the discretion of the commission. B. Licensing Requirements. l' Any person owning, conducting, managing, or operating any kennel within the city shall pay for the privilege of maintaining or operating such kennel a license fee established by city council resolution. z' In any cases where during the year for which a kennel license has been issued, the number of animals in any licensed kennel is increased, the person conducting, managing, or operating such o kennel shall obtain a new license after approval by the planning commission to cover the increased number therein. should an increase be denied by the planning commission, the person may appeal to the city council. Should approval be granted for an increase in the number of animals at the kennel, the increased fee shall be prorated for the remainder of the year. . C. Vaccination Requirements. A kennel operator shall not be required to 'obtain the individual license imposed by this ordinance for each dog in his/her kennel for which the kennel is obtained; however, each kennel operator shall ensure that each dog in his/her kennel is vaccinated as required by this ordinance. D. Kennel Inspection. ^ ` l. Because of the need to adequately protect animals within kennels from unhealthy conditions and practices, the interest of the ` public in preventing inhumane practices, reasonable inspections by the city shall be completed.' As o condition of the issuance of o kennel license, each operator shall ' agree to allow such inspection; such acknowledgement shall be made part of the application and file' Each kennel for which o kennel license has been issued shall be inspected at intervals determined by the city. ' ^ z' Any kennel which is found by the city to be unsanitary or o menace to animal or public health, safety or welfare, is declared to be public nuiaanoe. The city is authorized and empowered to take such action as is necessary to abate the nuisance. In the event immediate action is necessary to preserve or protect animal or public health, safety, or welfare, the city is authorized and empowered to summarily abate such nuisance by any reasonable means including but not limited to impoundment of the animal(s) and/or immediate closure of the kennel for such time until the nuisance is abated. The city may also commence abatement proceedings in accordance with Title 8 of the Son Jacinto Municipal Code' ` Section m' Animal Regulations. A. Keeping Certain Animals in citvgrobibited' No person, either as owner, agent, or employee, shall keep any horses, cattle, mules, burros, sheep, goats, bogs, similar large animals, or live poultry or domestic fowl within the city in any zone under the zoning law of the city that does not specifically authorize the keeping of such animal or fowl' The keeping f any such animal or fowl in any other zone not specifically authorized the same is declared to be a public nuisance. private Prks- B. Kennel License Required. No person shall own, harbor, or keep on or at any property more than two (2) dogs or two (2) cats, which are four (4) or more months of age without having a kennel license as provided for in Section 7 of this ordinance. C. Disturbing the Peace Prohibited. No person shall own or harbor an animal in such a manner that the peace or quiet of the public is unreasonably disturbed. The keeping or maintenance, or permitting to be kept or maintained, on any premises owned, occupied, or controlled by any person of any animal or fowl which, by frequent or long continued noise, shall cause unreasonable annoyance or discomfort to any reasonable number of persons of normal sensitivity residing in close proximity of the habitation of the same shall constitute a violation of this subsection; provided, however, that nothing contained herein shall be construed to apply to reasonable noises emanating from legal operated veterinary hospitals, animal shelters, farm and/or agricultural facilities, or areas where keeping of animals or fowl are permitted. D. Animal Care. 1. Animal premises shall be kept sanitary and shall not constitute a fly breeding area or a source of offensive odors or potential human and animal disease. 2. No person shall abandon any animal on any or public property. Prohibition on School rrwnr3s and in City be brought onto prohib. or other achoo1-1"f A licensed 11°— City arieprov1r3d Under the control Pqtperson. F. Restraint 1. No person, as owner, or having charge, care, custody, or control of any ox, steer, bull, cow, calf, horse, mare, stallion, colt, jack, mule, sheep, goat, hog, or domestic fowl shall permit the same to run at large on public or private property owned by another without permission. 2. Every person owning or having charge, care, custody, or control of any dog shall keep such dog exclusively upon his/her own premises, however such dog may be off such premises if it is under restraint of a competent person. 3. Dog owners shall securely confine their female dogs while in season (estrus) within an enclosure in a manner that will prevent the attraction of male dogs to the immediate vicinity. 4. All dogs under four (4) months of age shall be confined to the premises of or kept under physical restraint by the owner, keeper, or harborer. G. Defecation Removal Required. No person shall allow a dog in his/her custody to defecate or to urinate on property other than the owner or person having control of the dog. It shall be the duty of all persons having control of a dog to curb such dog and to immediately remove any feces to a proper receptacle. Legally blind persons while relying on a guide dog shall be exempt from this section. .ng or cause any pet to is does not ounds for teaching 001 officials. grounds of any a 1ah and H. Animals in Vehicles. l. No person shall leave an animal in an unattended vehicle without adequate ventilation or in such a manner as to subject the animal to extreme temperatures which adversely affect the animal's health and welfare. 2. If after a search of the area the owner cannot be 'found, the ACo/golioe officer feels the animal's health is in danger, the animal may with the approval of the police supervisor be removed from the vehicle and transported to a veterinarian for treatment. A notice shall be left on the vehicle stating the following: a. Why the animal was removed/ b' Name, address, and telephone number of the veterinarian where the animal is being treated; C. The authority to remove the animal/ and d' Name of person(s) removing the aoimal' z' The owner or person having control of the animal when it was removed from the vehicle shall be responsible for all costs for the treatment of the animal as may be applicable. I. Protection of Animals Utilized by the Police Department. It is unlawful for any person to willfully tease, taunt, torment, strike, kick, mutilate, disable, or otherwise injure, or kill, or interfere, or meddle with any dog orhoree while such animal is being utilized by the police department or any officer or employee thereof in the performance of any function or duty of the department or of such officer or employee. Section p. Potentially Dangerous and Vicious Dogs. Findings, definitions, and general provisions relating to this section shall be in accordance with California rood and Agricultural code Sections 31601 through 3I682' oaotloo 10, Public Nuisance. A. General grnvioiono, The introduction, possession, or maintenance of any animal or allowing of any animal to be in contravention of this ordinance is, in addition to being a violation, hereby declare to be a public nuisance. The 8co or Police Officers are hereby authorized, directed, and empowered to summarily abate any such public nuisance independently of any criminal prosecution or the results thereof by any means reasonably necessary including, but not limited to the destruction of animal(s) involved, or by the imposition of specific reasonable conditions and/or restrictions for the maintenance of the animal (o)' Failure to comply with such conditions and/or restrictions is a miodemeaoor' The city may also commence abatement proceedings in accordance with Title 8 of the San Jacinto Municipal code' B. Notification of BiqbttoOearioq' At least ten (ln) days prior to the impoundment and/or abatement, the owner or custodian of record shall be notified of their right to a hearing to determine whether grounds exist for such impoundment and/or abatement. If the owner or custodian of record requests a hearing prior to impoundment and/or abatement, no impoundment or abatement shall take place until the conclusion of the hearing except as noted in Section 10'C' 10 c' Immediate Impoundment. Wbao, in the opinion of the city, immediate impoundment is necessary for the preservation of animal or public health, safety, or welfare, or if the animal has been impounded under other provisions of this ordinance or state law, the pre - impoundment hearing shall be waived. However, the owner or custodian of record shall be given a notice allowing ten <10> days to request an abatement hearing. If requested, a hearing shall be bald within ten (10) days of the request and the animal shall not be disposed of prior to the conclusion of the hearing. If after tan (10) days no request for a hearing is received from the owner or custodian of record, the animal in question shall be disposed of under applicable provisions of the law. Section 11' Permit Required. &. No person shall keep, conduct, or operate within the city any kennel, pet shop, zoo, riding academy, animal rental establishment, boarding stable, pony ring or pony ride, circus, rodeo, pet show, dog show, oat show, animal acts or exhibitions, wild animals, miscellaneous animal orreptile establishment, or pigeons without first obtaining a written permit from the Department of Animal Control. ' B. This permit will be in addition to any other requirements imposed by the city or Department of Animal Control. C. Permit Fees shall be established as outlined in section s of this ordinance. Section 12. Deao and Pigeons. A. Bees. No person shall establish or maintain any hive or box where bees are kept or beep any bees within the city except: l' That a hive or box for the keeping of bees may be located and kept within a school house for the purpose of study or observation; 2. That abive or box for the keeping of bees may be kept in a physician's office laboratory for medical research ortreatment or for scientific purposes; 3. Newly annexed areas where the keeping of bees was allowed prior to annexation; 4. In any cooa under the zoning law of the city that specifically authorizes the keeping of bees; and 5. That no bees permitted to be kept on any premise under subsections l and 3 shall be permitted to fly at large' B. Pigeons/Doves 1. No person shall erect or maintain any pigeon house or dove cote, or other structure or place where pigeons or doves are kept within the city without first obtaining the consent of the planning commission in the form of a variance and a permit from the Department of Animal Control. 3. No person shall erect or maintain any pigeon booaa or dove cote or other structure or place where pigeons and doves are kept or keep any pigeons or doves laoo than fifty (50) feat of the dwelling house of the owner of such pigeon b000a, dove cote, or other structure, or within one hundred and fifteen (zoo) feet of any dwelling or living quarters of any person other than the owner of such pigeon house or dove oota' s' Such persons shall comply with all other rules and regulations ofthe Department of Animal control applicable to the keeping of pigeons or doves. 1 1 Section 13. wild Animals. A. General gzuvioiuno' It shall be unlawful for any person to possess or maintain any wild animal unless he/she complies with all federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and permit requirements affecting such animals. The owner shall also: l. Keep the animals at all times in cages or enclosures of a recommended size and ounotzootiun or confined in such a manner as to prelude the possibility of eaoape' Such cages, enclosures, or confinement shall be of such size as to permit the animals reasonable freedom of movement/ 3. Keep the cages or enclosures in a clean and sanitary condition at all times; ' 3. Provide the animals with adequate food, water, shelter, and veterinary care; 4' Keep the animals in a manner au as not to threaten or annoy any person of normal sensitivity; 5. Take adequate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the animals and to preserve animal and public health, safety, and welfare. In the event of escape, immediately notify the city Animal Control Department or Police Department and make every reasonable effort to recapture the aoimal(a). 0. Upon request of the city Animal Control Department, make his/her animal (o), premises, facilities, equipment, and any necessary permits available for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the provisions of this section; and 7. Reimburse the city for all costs incurred in enforcing the provisions of this section when a violation is found and shall be responsible for any injury or any damage to private or public property caused by the animal (o)' ' D. Location and Transportation. Animals shall be transported in escape -proof enclosures to the private property of the animal's owner or authorized agent' All other transportation is prohibited unless authorized by the city animal cuotzul Department. C. Impoundment a Abatement' The city animal Control Department may impound and/or abate any animal held in violation of this section and relocate or dispose of it in a humane manner or impose specific reasonable conditions and/or restrictions for the maintenance uf the animal(a). At least ten (lO) days prior to impoundment and/or abatement, the owner shall be notified of his/her right to a bearing as to whether the animal is being held in violation of this section. If the owner requests a bearing Dziuz to impoundment and/or abatement, no impoundment and/or abatement shall take place until the conclusion of the bearing except as noted in Section zs.o. D. Immediate Impoundment. If, in the opinion of the city, immediate impoundment is necessary for the preservation of animal or public health, safety, or welfare, or if the animal has been impounded under other provisions of this ordinance or State law, the pre - impoundment hearing may be dispensed with. In such cases, the owner shall be given ten (lV) days notice of his/her right to a bearing as to whether the animal was being held in violation of this seotiun' If requested, the bearing shall be held within ten (zo) days of the request and the animal shall not be disposed of prior to the conclusion of the bearing. If, at the conclusion of the bearing, the impoundment is found not to be 12 justified, the animal shall be returned to the owner without charge. The city may also commence abatement proceedings in accordance with Title 8 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code. Section 14. Animal Performances. A. Permit. No person shall use or work any animal in any theatrical, motion picture, television, or other performance or production without first obtaining a permit from the Department of Animal Control. However, any person in possession of a permit for animal acts or exhibitions, circus, or rodeo per Section 11 of this ordinance shall not be required to obtain a permit under this section for the same activities. B. Maiming, Injuring, or Killing Animals During Performance. No person shall knowingly maim, injure, or kill any animal that is used in any theatrical, motion picture, television, or other performance or production. Nor shall any person use, cause, permit, or allow the use of any device, machine, or contrivance to maim, injure, or kill any animal in such performance or production. C. Inspections. It shall be the duty of the City Department of Animal Control to inspect and investigate the use or work of animals in theatrical, motion picture, television, and other performances or productions. Section 15. Impoundment. A. Capture of Animals at Large. The ACO or Police Officer shall attempt to capture any animal found at large in violation of this ordinance and may destroy an animal at large if, in their judgment, such action is required for public health and safety. The ACO or Police Officer shall not seize or impound any dog for being at large that has strayed from but returned to the private property of its owner or the person who has the right to control the dog. In such cases, a citation may be issued. In situations where the owner or person who has a right to control the dog is not home, the dog may be impounded. The ACO or Police Officer shall post a notice of such impounding on the front door of the living unit of the owner or person who has the right to control the dog. Such notice shall state the following: That the dog has been impounded, where the dog is being held, the name, address, and telephone number of the agency or person to be contacted regarding the release of the dog, and an indication of the ultimate disposition of the dog if no action to regain it is taken within a specified period of time by its owner or by the person who has a right to control the dog. B. Animals Found by Private Citizens. Any person who finds an animal at large may take it into his/her possession and must as soon as possible but no later than twenty-four (24) hours thereafter notify the Department of Animal Control and shall surrender the animal on demand. The finder of the animal at large shall use reasonable care to protect the animal from injury; however he/she shall not be held liable if the animal dies, escapes, or injures itself while he/she is carrying out the provisions of this subsection. C. Any person who relinquishes an animal to the ACO, Police Officer, or Animal Shelter shall give his/her name, address, and if he/she is not the owner, the location where the animal was found. D. Notification to Owner. Upon impoundment of an animal wearing a license tag or identification listing 11 the owner's name and address, the ACO or Shelter shall immediately mail to the owner of record at the address indicated a notice of the location of the animal. E. Return of Animals to their Owners. 1. The owner of an impounded animal may claim it prior to its legal disposition by providing proper identification, meeting all rabies and licensing requirements of this ordinance, and paying all applicable redemption fees. 2. Upon the second or subsequent impoundment of an animal, the City Department of Animal Control may, in addition to fees required to be paid, issue a citation to the owner to appear in court. F. Holding Period, Disposition, and Altering. 1. The Animal Shelter shall hold impounded lost or stray dogs or cats for not less than three (3) working days if it was not wearing a license tag when impounded, and for not less than five (5) working days if it was wearing a license tag or other identification. If the Animal Shelter has reason to believe that an owner exits or that the owner or custodian may claim it prior to other disposition, the animal may be held for seven (7) working days. 2. The Animal Shelter may humanely dispose of or transfer to a new owner upon payment of the applicable fee, any impounded animal not claimed by its owner or custodian within the prescribed holding time. Animals relinquished by their owners may be destroyed or transferred to a new owner without regard to any prescribed holding time. Injured or diseased animals may be humanely destroyed without regard to the prescribed holding time in order to alleviate suffering or to protect other impounded animals from exposure to a contagious disease. A certificate of any licensed veterinarian shall be conclusive evidence of the extent of injury or contagious disease. 3. If no person appears and claims livestock impounded under this section within five (5) days, the Animal Shelter shall proceed to sell or cause to be sold such livestock, except Bovine, at public sale. 4. If no person appears and claims any Bovine animal impounded under this section within five (5) days, the Animal Shelter shall so notify the local brand inspector. 5. Any dog not claimed by its owner and which has not been altered shall not be sold or given away unless a deposit for altering such dog has been deposited with the Animal Shelter to be refunded upon presentation of proof of altering by licensed veterinarian. 6. Any cat not claimed by its owner and which has not been altered shall not be sold or given away unless a deposit for altering such cat has been deposited with the Animal Shelter to be refunded upon presentation of proof of altering by a licensed veterinarian. 7. Individuals adopting any cat or dog under the terms of (5) and (6) above shall have the altering performed within sixty (60) days from the date of adoption unless the animal is under six (6) months of age at the time of adoption. In such case, the individual shall have the altering performed within six (6) months of adoption. Failure to complete the surgery within the above -specified period or the transfer of ownership of a cat or dog over six (6) months of age prior to altering shall constitute a misdemeanor. 14 a' The deposit required by (s) and (e) above shall be forfeited to the animal Shelter if proof of altering has not been presented to the Animal Shelter within the period specified in (7) obove' Such forfeited deposits shall be placed in a trust fund to be utilized by the Animal Shelter to defray the cost of materials, supplies, equipment, and other expenses incidental to the conducting of public education programs to promote responsible pet ownership and the altering of Pets to prevent pet overpopulation. Section 16' Control Provisions. ' A. Enforcement. It is the duty of the Animal Control Officer of the City to enforce the provisions of this ordinance, and for that purpose, he/she is designated a Peace Officer. Any Police officer of this city shall also be responsible for enforcing the provisions of this ordinance and any law relating to or affecting animals of the State of California and the City of San Jacinto. ` B. complaiots' upon receiving a complaint alleging a violation of this ordinance and upon determining the name and address of the owner of the animal, if known, an investigation to determine whether a violation exists may be made. If the investigation discloses a violation of this ordinance, prosecution may be initiated against the owner. Complainants' identities may, if requested, be kept confidential to the extent permitted by law. C. znveotigationo' l. The acO or any police officer may enter private property to investigate possible violations of and enforce the provisions of this ordinance and any law related to or affecting animals of the State of California and the City of San Jacinto. 2' Any person who interferes with, opposes, or resists the aco or other persona charged with the enforcement of this ordinance while tbeACn or such other person may be engaged in the performances of his/her duties is guilty of a misdemeanor. D. Arrest and Citations. Each person referred to in Section 10'A shall have the power to' make arrest without warrant in the manner prescribed in section 935'5 of the California Penal Code for violations of those provisions of this ordinance and state law which he/she has a duty to enforce and to issue citations for such violations. Any person so arrested who does not demand to be taken before a magistrate may Instead be cited in the manner prescribed in Chapter 5c (commencing with Section 853.5) of Title 3, Part 2 of the Penal code. Section 17' Hearings. A. All hearings required pursuant to this ordinance shall be conducted by the Chief of Police or by a person designed byhim who shall not have been directly involved in the subject action. Hearings shall be held not more than ten (10) days from the date of the receipt of the request for the bearing and shall be conducted in an informal manner consistent with due process of law' A bearing may be continued if the bearing officer deems it necessary and proper or if the owner or custodian shows good cause. The Chief of Police or the person designated by him shall render a brief written decision which shall be final. Failure to conduct a bearing required by this ordinance shall have no bearing on any criminal prosecution or violation of any provisions of this ordinance or state law' 15 B. Each party during a hearing shall have the right to call and examine witnesses; to introduce exhibits; to cross examine opposing witnesses on any matter relevant to the issue even though that matter was not covered in the direct examination; to subpoena any witness to testify; and to rebut the evidence against the party. If the owner or custodian does not testify in his/her own behalf, the owner or custodian may be called and examined as if under cross-examination. C. Hearings need not be conducted according to technical rules relating to evidence and witnesses. Any relevant evidence shall be admitted if it is the sort of evidence on which responsible persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of serious affairs, regardless of the existence of any common law or statutory rule which might make improper the admission of such evidence over objection in civil actions. Hearsay evidence may be used for the purpose of supplementing or explaining any direct evidence but shall not be sufficient in itself to support a finding unless it would be admissible over objection in civil actions. The rules of privilege shall be affective to the same extent that they are now or hereafter recognized in civil actions and irrelevant and unduly repetitious evidence shall be excluded. Section 18. Violation - Penalty. A. Infraction. Any person violating any provisions of this ordinance is guilty of an infraction except as set forth in subsection B, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by: 1. A fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100) for a first violation; 2. A fine not exceeding two hundred dollars ($200) for a second violation of this ordinance within one (1) year; 3. A fine not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500) for each additional violation of this ordinance within one (1) year. B. Misdemeanor. Any person violating any provisions of Sections 4.A, 4.F, 4.G, 8.A, 8.B, 8.C, 8.D, 8.E, 89.F, 8.H.1, 8.1, 13.A, 13.B, 14.B, 15.F.7, 16.C.2, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000) or imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months or both. C. Each day such violation is committed or permitted to continue shall constitute a separate offense. Section 19. Severability Clause. If any part of this ordinance shall be held invalid, such part shall be deemed severable and the invalidity thereof shall not affect the remaining parts of this ordinance. 16 1 INTRODUCED as a regular meeting of the said City Council on 2 the 3 4 MOVED, PASSED D ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City 5 Council on the day of , 1992 by the 6 following vote: 7 8 AYES: 9 10 NOES: 11 12 ABSENT: 13 14 ATTEST: 15 16 17 Mayor day of , 1992. 18 19 20 Deputy City Clerk City of San Jacinto STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief/Building Official Via City Manager Pamela S. Easter DATE: March 17, 1992 SUBJECT: GRAFFITI SURVEY OF CITY Recommendation: 7 I? Staff recommends that the City Council consider removing all existing graffiti on both private and public property at City expense using the Community Development Block Grant (C.D.B.G.) funds which are set aside for graffiti abatement (approximately $1,700). Staff also recommends that all new graffiti on private property be abated using the City's nuisance abatement ordinance No. 875 until the approval of the City Beautification Ordinance in May 1992. Background: A graffiti survey of the City was requested by the City Council on March 3, 1992. This survey was completed on March 9, 1992 and reflects the number of areas with graffiti and the approximate square footage of graffiti. The survey follows this report. A picture was also taken of each individual graffiti and is available for review. The cost to remove this blight was figured using the current costs by the Valley Teen Project and La Rue Painting. Staff met with the police sergeants to get their input on graffiti from a law enforcement perspective. Unfortunately, they all agreed the judicial process is not favorable for graffiti cases because of the pressing number of more "serious" crimes. They recommended stricter enforcement of the sales of spray paint cans to minors. In addition they were favorable to more surveillance of previously painted areas which are common targets for graffiti (such as the old post office). They were unanimous that the key to graffiti is its prompt removal. Experience has shown that the faster graffiti is removed the more discouraged graffiti painters become and they usually go somewhere else. They recommended 24 hours or less! Staff has also conducted several public meetings to get community input on the graffiti problem. A majority of those citizens expressed their view that individual property owners should be responsible for its removal. However, there was much discussion Page 1 about how the City could assist in this process rather than have to go through a long administrative procedure using the nuisance abatement ordinance. Ideas consisted of: the City provide the paint and the owner provide the labor or City provide labor and owner provide paint; split the costs of graffiti removal with the property owner; use volunteers to assist those who physically and/or financially unable to remove; use "community service" workers to remove; get stores to donate paint and rollers and brushes and have youth organizations remove; use the parents of those juveniles who are caught graffiting to remove; using the juveniles who are caught graffiting to remove; establish a City sponsored graffiti reward program; establish a "graffiti hotline"; provide an education program for citizens which encourages property owners to remove graffiti as soon as possible; treat graffiti removal like weed abatement; and, encourage and participate in better school programs to eliminate graffiti before it happens. Staff will continue to research other jurisdictions for ideas and/or graffiti programs which have been successful. GRAFFITI SURVEY As Of March 9, 1992 Private Public Property Property Total Number 62 15 77 Square Feet Cost to Abate: 1,138 VTP $1,733 at $25 per call + $0.25 per square foot over 100 sq. ft. La Rue 1,059 2,197 >435 $2,168 2,280 $561 at $35 per call + $0.15 per square foot over 100 sq. ft. $2,841 Page 2 TO: FROM: DATE: S C MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayor & embers of the City Council Pame a , City Manager March 17, 1992 MEMO UM OF UNDERSTANDING - Soboba Band of Mission Indians, Bureau of Land Management, City of San Jacinto As you'll recall, the City Council reviewed a draft of the proposed memorandum at your 6:30 pm study session on January 21, 1992. Your feedback and comments from the study session were incorporated into the re -draft that was sent to Roger Morgan, for review by the other parties of the agreement. Roger Morgan, several members of the Tribal Council and I met subsequently to complete a final review of the MOU. A BLM representative was also included through conference call. The attached Memorandum of Understanding reflects the various groups' comments and changes that have been made subsequently by the Tribe and Roger Morgan. Additions are shadowed, deletions are lined -through. It has been signed by the Soboba Band of Mission Indians, and Inteiniac, Inc. The BLM has signed an earlier draft. Roger will be following up to secure their signature on this newest version. In my absence, Brian McNabb will be presenting this staff report at the Council meeting and will be available to answer any questions you might have. MO ' • 11 UM OF UNDERSTANDING Between Intermac, Soboba Band of Mission Indians the Bureau of Land Management, and City of San Jacinto WHEREAS, The BAND is interested in job training and job creation for tribal members. WHEREAS, The CITY and BAND are interested in increased mutual participation in developing the community for mutual benefit and enjoyment. WHEREAS, The BAND has had a problem of increased traffic and people dumping trash on the reservation and, as a result, has closed the access route through the reservation as a means of control. This has impacted all those who have used this as the only access route from San Jacinto to the mountains for recreational purposes such as paragliding and hang gliding, and those who have personal or business interests on outlying properties. BLM and INTERMAC are interested in establishing a policy that would curtail the dumping problem and also provide temporary access, while a longer term solution is pursued. The CITY supports the Band in their effort to curtail dumping on the reservation. WHEREAS, BLM is interested in having public access to the 17,000 acres it has designated as recreation lands in the area adjacent to Soboba Summit. This access can be accomplished through the Soboba Reservation. WHEREAS, INTERMAC is interested in working with the BAND on an access road through the reservation to its property on North Mountain. WHEREAS, INTERMAC is interested in cooperating with the BAND with regard to sand and gravel operations whereby these products, which are vital to the development of our community, can be provided in an economically beneficial way while limiting significant adverse environmental impacts of neighboring areas. WHEREAS, THE CITY is interested in a conceptual master plan for tiii.otrlidiit° along Soboba Road from State Street, east to the Reservaton, us well as the resource material including the mineral rsourcestliat:#10 available in the area, including that on the Reservation. WHEREAS, ALL parties agree that the SOBOBA SUMMIT project, notwithstanding the normal environmental and regulatory reviews of the project, could provide significant economic, recreation and employment opportunities for the community and members of the reservation and help establish the community as a major destination resort community, which could have excellent collateral benefits for other businesses in the area. Page Two 'THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: The CITY is currently studying the concept of a haul road in the San Jacinto River with the BAND as a means of getting the sand and gravel trucks, entering or leaving the reservation to the Ramona Expresswway, in a manner minimizing the impact on existing and future residents in the area. The BAND will , ee, to explorearid „.,...mpoy provide access to the mountains for those wishing to traveJ there via CaStilie Canyon Road until a new road can be constructed. A teity A*01tOtteetdt a key and/or pass from the Tribal office. Since the main impact has been felt by the paragliders and hang gliders, and Intermac feels these people and this sport will be instrumental in development plans for the SOBOBA SUMMIT project. Intermac agrees to underwrite the start up expenses for this program, and The BAND agrees to dcrnoi trate . . le Baid''''''''a Wiiiiiblipttite*OttitttTort to deVet rus „andlabit plan for The CITY agrees to explore alternative bridge locations other than the proposed bridge at ake Park Drive, including, but not limited to, Seventh Street, Esplanade Avenue, and Soboba Road. Funding for the bridge has yet to be determined. The cost of the bridge should be shared by those who will receive the benefit from the bridge. The BAND will gfafttre*ocrsojo4*:4Mip:*qi••!A:....:.. 6616pifeltbf an irrevocable 66' easement for a new mad from Soboba Road through the west side of the reservation intersecting with BLM land. and an unimproved road called Castille Canyon Road on USGS maps. INTERMAC agrees to pay for the cost of the permanent road prior to commencing construction on Soboba...Sununkby * is to develop the rough road as soon as possible, and hard surface it as the project comes on line. Through the entitlement process, it will be necessary to address, with INTERMAC, the BAND, and other parties the issues of private versus public road, financing, and accessibility. BLM agrees to cooperate to the maximum extent possible in expediting consideration of a Right of Way application for the road leading to INTERMAC'S property, and to assist in considering a land swap which would allow INTERMAC the ability to acquire the developable portions of Section 12, so that the costs of the road can be more easily amortized over a larger development. THE CITY is willing to explore with the BAND, State and County any mutual benefit that could be gained by the CITY providing fire protection to the Indian Reservation. Page Three INTERMAC and The BAND will work together for job training on earthmoving equipment. BLM will work with the BAND in planning efforts for the trail network as part of the recreation area. BLM will assist in developing public awareness of the overall recreational opportunities of the Soboba Summit Area. INTERMAC will work with the BAND to provide job training and employment opportunities for Tribal personnel on the SOBOBA SUMMIT project, both during the construction phase and operational phase thereafter. BENEFITS: This agreement ha..s the potential of creating and providing lasting benefits to all par ies in terms nf job creation, economic benefits, and recreational possibilities. ii could also • ible acccs route to the mountains io proceed and become part oi the San Jacinto Communty. It may also start a new era in terms of integrating Inc BAND with BLM and the CITY, and a lasting example of how the public and private sectors can work together for mutual benefit. THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO THE SOBOBA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS THE BUREAU OF IN! BRMAC, INC. LAND MANAGEMENT STAFF REPORT 17 DA1E: March 17, 1992 TO: City Council FROM: Mayor Boykin SUBJEC 1 : League of Cities - Inland Division Boundary Change RECOMMENDATION: That the Council review the correspondence presented by the City of Yucaipa and share their thoughts on the proposal. March 2, 1992 Dear Mayor: A task force has been appointed to consider the boundaries of the Inland Division of the League of California Cities. The task force has decided to take an advisory vote of the cities in the district to determine further action. We ask that the issue be placed on your council's agenda with a response to the task force by March 27, 1992. The questions for the councils are as follows: Shall the Inland Empire Division of the League of California Cities retain the existing division boundaries? Yes or No If the boundaries are changed, which new district boundaries would you favor? A. San Bernardino (except the upper desert) as one division and Riverside County as the other; or B. Western Riverside County cities (WRCOG) and Western San Bernardino County cities (all cities other than Twenty Nine Palms, Yucca Valley, and Needles) as one division; Eastern Riverside County (CVAG cities and Blythe) as the other division with discussions to consider the possibility of Twenty Nine Palms, Yucca Valley, and Needles leaving the Desert Mountain Division to join this one. The study arises from a proposal last year to split the division in half with Riverside County becoming one division, and San Bernardino, except the upper desert (which is in the Desert Mountain Division) becoming another. 34272 YUCAIPA BLVD., YUCAIPA, CA 92399 • PHONE (714) 797-2489 • FAX (714) 790-9203 PROS AND CONS OF LEAGUE DIVISION SPLIT Advantages of Division Split Along County Lines 1. Would provide greater representation on League Board and on policy committees. 2. Would offer greater opportunities for local officials to hold League leadership positions. 3. Would provide an opportunity to discuss common county problems. 4. Would offer an opportunity to develop a unified county -wide position on State and Federal legislation. Note: Items 3 and 4 can now largely be accomplished through SANBAG in San Bernardino County. The Mayors' and Council Members Conference would be the mechanism in Riverside County. Disadvantages of Division Split Along County Lines 1. Would reduce the opportunity to discuss regional (inter -county) issues. 2. Would reduce the opportunity for officials from adjoining cities in different counties to interact and discuss common problems (e.g., Rialto and Riverside, Calimesa and Yucaipa, etc.) 3. Would encourage other League divisions (esp. Los Angeles County) to split perhaps to the point that any additional League representation gained would be diluted to the point of ineffectiveness. 4. Would leave a remnant of San Bernardino County which, would consist of 14 cities (absent the mountain and desert communities) as a separate League Division. 5. Would reduce the opportunity for city managers of the two counties to interact (unless the managers of both counties continue to meet jointly). Alternatives 1. Riverside County, could attend a bi-monthly Mayors' and Council Members' meeting to discuss Riverside County issues and use the alternating bi-monthly Inland Empire League meeting to discuss inter -county issues and issues of statewide concern. 2. The bi-monthly Inland Empire League meeting could be preceded by separate county caucuses to discuss topics of interest to only Riverside County or San Bernardino County. 3. Rather than split the Division along county lines, split off the lower desert from the rest of the Division.