Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 10/5/1993AGENDA SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYAND THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY DATE: October 5, 1993 TIME: 7:30 P.M. PLACE: CONIVRINITY CENTER 625 South Pico San Jacinto, California 1.0 CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Moment of Silence for Reflection Pledge of Allegiance 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 2.1 Update on Proposition No. 172 - County Supervisor Kay Ceniceros 2.2 San Jacinto Police Department Citizen Volunteer Program 3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person may address the Council on any subject pertaining to city business not listed on the agenda, during this portion of the meeting. A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the Council. 4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/FINANCING AUTHORITY 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion by the City Council in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the City Council, staff or the public requests specified items to be removed and/or discussed. 1 Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come forward, upon invitation of the Mayor, state their name, address and theConsent Calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three (3) minutes. 5.1 Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 17, 1993 RECONWIENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 17, 1993, as presented. 5.2 Minutes of the Special Meeting of August 24, 1993 RECONWENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of August 24, 1993, as presented. 5.3 Warrant Register RECONINENDATION: Approve Warrant No. 35418 through 35560 dated September 30, 1993 in the amount of $348,646.53, and Payroll Check No. 1189 through 1285, dated September 17, 1993 in the amount of $89,202.74. 5.4 Treasurer's Report - August 1993 - Vega RECONWENDATION: Receive and file. 5.5 Parking Enforcement Program RECONWENDATION: Waive the reading in full and read by title only (Second Reading), and adopt Ordinance. No. 987 establishing parking regulations and repealing Ordinance No. 358. ORDINANCE NO. 987 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, A CAL IFORNIAMUNICIPAUTY, CONCERNING THE REGULATION OF VEHICULAR PARKING IN THE CITY AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF 5.6 Zoning Ordinance Amendment 5-93 Applicant: City Initiated RECOMMENDATION: Waive the reading in full and read by title only (Second Reading), and adopt Ordinance No. 988 approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment 5-93. ORDINANCE NO. 988 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 5-93 IS HEREBY APPROVED THEREBY AMENDING ORDINANCE 340, ARTICLE 17.05, ARTICLE 17,12 AND ESTABLISHING ARTICLE 17.13 2 5.7 Resolution Establishing Policy for Fiscal Administration of Construction Contracts RECONMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto Establishing a Policy for Fiscal Administration of Construction Contracts. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ESTABLISHING POLICY FOR FISCAL ADMINISTRATION OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS 5.8 Ratification of Conditional Use Permit 2-93 END OF CONSENT CALENDAR Motion by: Seconded by: to approve consent calendar items 5.1 through 5.8 and adopt Ordinance No. 987 and Ordinance No. 988, and adopt Resolution No. 6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS 7.1 Community Facilities District Administration - Vega RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. 7.1a Community Facilities District No. 2 Annual Special. Tax Revision - Vega RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto revising the annual special taxes for certain assessor's parcels in Community Facilities District No. 2 (CFD No. 2) for fiscal year 1993-94. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISING THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAXES FOR CERTAIN ASSESSOR'S PARCELS IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-1994 7.2 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Update - Chadwick RECOMMENDATION: Receive an update from staff concerning the City's efforts regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). 7.3 Vosburg Hotel Renovation Timeline - (continued from 9-21-93) - Chadwick RECOMMENDATION: Receive Oral Update. 7,4 Update on Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Application - Chadwick RECOMMENDATION: Receive Oral Update. 7.5 Pavement Maintenance Priorities - Evans RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a street maintenance policy and a Five Year Pavement Management Plan. 7.6 1993-94 Budget Update/Election of the Teeter Plan - Vega RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file 1993-94 fiscal year budget update; direct staff to submit a mid -year budget report with appropriate budget amendment resolution in January 1994; adopt Resolution No. declining to participate in the Teeter Plan with the County of Riverside. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CAUFORNIA, MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 4715 OF THE REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLINING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTION OF TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS KNOWN AS THE TEETER PLAN 7.7 Authorization to submit Police Hiring Supplement Program Grant Proposal - Holmes RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the submission of a Grant Proposal for the Police Hiring Supplement Program if matching funds can be found. 8.0 MAYOR/ COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS 8.1 Appointment of Planning Commissioners RECOMMENDATION: Appoint one (1) Planning Commissioner to begin immediately serving a short term of office expiring October 31, 1996; appoint two (2) Planning Commissions to begin serving full terms of office in November 1993 with terms of office expiring October 31, 1997. 9.0 CLOSED SESSION 9.1 Real Estate Property Acquisition pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 4 10.0 ADJOURNMENT Motion by: Seconded by: Action: to adjourn. Vote: I, Richard Brewer, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that I caused to be posted the foregoing agenda this 30th day of September, 1993, as required by law. ( auuq� ) Deputy City Clerk 5 +G ouN Pamela Easter City of San Jacinto P.O. Box 488 San Jacinto, CA 92583 Dear Mr. Easter: City M C)ffang gets BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Sep 0 BOB BUSTER �19275-1010 � �I iJ� MELBA DUNLAP SIDE KAY CENICEROS 275.1030 PATRICIA (CORKY) LARSON 275.1040 NORTON YOUNGLOVE 275-1050 September 14, 1993 On November 2, voters in Riverside County and across California will have a unique opportunity to preserve.$1.5 billion in public safety funding through extension of an existing half -cent sales tax. Proposition 172 will ask voters to extend this funding and dedicate it directly to vital public safety services. (The funds collected will be set aside in a special public safety trust fund, separate from the County General Fund.) Proposition 172, the Local Public Safety Protection and Improvement Act of 1993, is not a new tax. It will pose no additional cost to taxpayers. It will, instead, direct existing sales tax proceeds to support local public safety programs. Extending the existing sales tax would yield $47 million to support local and Countywide services provided by the District Attorney, Sheriff, Coroner, Probation and County Fire; as well as $2 million to cities within Riverside County to fund city public safety programs. With so much at stake, we are committed to providing County residents with accurate information about local issues relating to Proposition 172. Please contact the County's Public Information Officer at (909) 275-1111 if your business or civic organization would like to receive a forma eff at n on local Public Safety issues involved in Proposition 172. As you know, local public safety officials are fighting to stem the tide of increasing crime in Riverside County. While explosive population growth has yielded many benefits to our region, we have seen a corresponding increase in the crime rate, as well. Over the past two years alone, the Riverside County District Attorney's office has filed over 110,000 cases (comprising felonies, misdemeanors and juvenile petitions). The County Sheriff's Dispatch Center processes nearly 900,000 COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER • FOURTEENTH FLOOR • 4080 LEMON STREET • RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92501 Page 2 emergency calls per year. Overcrowding in Riverside County's jail system, the nation's 17th largest, is limiting our ability to keep criminals off local streets. Even though jail space is largely dedicated to only the most violent offenders, overcrowding persists. While the County will open a portion of the new Southwest County jail beginning in February, continued and expanded operation of this vital facility will be determined by voters' decision on Proposition 172. The Riverside County Law Enforcement Administrators Association (representing the Sheriff, District Attorney, Chief Probation Officer, and every police chief across Riverside County) has endorsed passage of Proposition 172. As locally elected officials, we urge you to carefully consider the value of public safety services which would be funded through this measure. Extension of this existing half -cent sales tax is vital to providing safe communities (by funding firefighters, patrol officers, prosecutors, jails and juvenile institutions). Should Proposition 172 fail, budgets for these critical services will suffer drastic cutbacks. Extending this existing half -cent could very well mean the difference between maintaining law and order in our communities and allowing criminals to go unprosecuted or be released from overcrowded jails by court order. PATRICIA A. LARSON Chairperson Board of Supervisors OVE TRASK District Attorney Cordially, COIS BYRD Sheriff EF-29-1993 15:57 FROM :=IDMIN OFFICE TO 9654372E P.02 16:01 FROM 'JNTY RBMIN OFFICE TO '=6547?28 P.12 Proposition 172 What's At Stake? • Prop 172 would direct $47 million to County Public Safety Services • Prop 172 would direct $2 million to local cities for public safety E.-2e-1957 1E:31 FFDM 'FTrr1DMill OFFICE ?0 51S4777E P.11 to existi t s 1 ca f s is s. ety se ices e srce;i_ert, srosec ti ire a rotectio , jails, juvenile snit do s c (1 1 ' r cee • ee .i 1 olice o icers a s eri s a ' fire ters o loc streets ort rosec do ee s i victe cri Si lic s. ety ty "EF-29-1 5 , =, : 0?2 FFOM .LNTY PI' i I H OFF I C:E TO r�4 ? F.14, NDA TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk Pamela S. Easter, City Manager October 5, 1993 Minutes of Regular Meeting of August 17, 1993 RECOMMENDATION Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of August 17, 1993, as presented. MINUTES SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE SAN JACINTO Fl CING AUTHORITY AUGUST 17, 1993 1.0 CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 7:35 P.M. by Mayor Hafliger at the Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, California. Present: Coundlmembers Ford, Solorio, Williams and Mayor Hafliger Absent: Councilmember Leahy A Moment of Silence was Observed for Reflection The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Hafliger 2.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS 2.1 Employee of the Quarter Mayor Hafliger made a presentation to Barbara Thomas for five years service. 2.2 Mayor presentation to Laurie Roy, San Jacinto School District for eight years. Recognized her services as coordinator of the Joint Power Student Work Program. Ms. Roy thanked City staff for cooperation and making it possible. Stated that students had gained skills and a sense of what it meant to be part of the community. Thanked Dan Thomson for his efforts and hoped to expand the program the next year. 3.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS None 4.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/FINANCING AUTHORITY At the hour of 7:45 P.M. convened the Redevelopment Agency/Financing Authority in joint session with the City Council for the following items: 4.1 Targeted Housing Activities Strategy City Manager Easter made presentation regarding the City's goals. Advised that the program information would be put in a brochure and distributed at City counters. 1 August 17, 1993 Mark Grisham, City Consultant, made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. In addition explained the plan covered two years worth of activities and stressed it was an accelerated program. Clarified that the tax exempt bond status also had a limited time for expenditures and that carry over funds needed to be expended to meet state mandates, thus the activity would decrease as funds were expended. The funds would be used for very specific activities. A MOTION was made by Agency Member Ford, seconded by Agency Member Solaria, acting in their capacity as the Redevelopment Agency, to adopt the housing program as outlined. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Agency Member Leahy absent. 4.2 San Jacinto Redevelopment Project - Amendment No. 1 Community Development Director McNabb made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. A MOTION was made by Agency Member Solorio, seconded by Agency Member Ford, acting in their capacity as the Redevelopment Agency, to adopt Resolution No. RDA-93-12, authorizing transmittal of the amended Redevelopment Plan Amendment and the Draft Environmental Impact Report to the appropriate taxing agencies. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Agency Member Leahy absent. RESOLUTION NO. RDA 93-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ORIZING _ _ MITTAL OF THE NDED REDEVELOPMENT P D ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT, N NT NO. 1 4.3 San Jacinto Redevelopment Plan - Assessment Rolls Change Community Development Director McNabb made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. Recommended that the Tax Rolls date should read FY 93/94, not 92/93. A MOTION was made by Agency Member Williams, seconded by Agency Member Ford, acting in their capacity as the Redevelopment Agency, to adopt Resolution No. RDA 93-13, notifying of plans to change assessment rolls, with the amended date as recommended by staff. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Agency Member Leahy absent. 7 August 17, 1993 RESOLUTION NO. RDA 93-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY NOTIFYING THE STATE BO r OF EQUALIZATION, COUNTY OFFICIALS, AND TAXING AGENCIES THAT IT PLANS TO CHANGE ASSESSMENT ROLLS 4.4 Advance RDA Funds - Assessment District 87-1 City Manager Easter made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. A MOTION was made by Agency Member Solorio, seconded by Agency Member Williams, acting in their capacity as the Redevelopment Agency, to authorize the Finance Director to advance and transfer $100,820.00 from RDA Reserves to Assessment District 87-1 for the purpose of paying principal of $50,000.00 and interest of $50,820.00 due on bonds. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Agency Member Leahy absent. At the hour of 7:55 P.M. adjourned the Redevelopment Agency/Financing Authority, and continue acting in the capacity of the City Council for the remainder of the agenda. 5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR City Attorney Cox requested that item 5.7 be moved to City Departments for action to occur following the public hearing. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Solorio, seconded by Councilmember Williams, to approve the consent calendar as presented, except item 5.7, which would be considered under City Departments. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Councilmember Leahy absent. 5.1 Warrant Register Approved Warrant No. 35078 through 35166, dated August 15, 1993, in the amount of $475,470.41, and Payroll Check No. 23184 through 23276, dated August 6, 1993, in the amount of $93,378.73. 5.2 Minutes of Regular Meeting of July 20 1993 Approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 20, 1993, as presented. 5.3 Minutes of Special Meeting of July 27. 1993 Approved the Minutes of the Special Meeting of July 27, 1993, as presented. 5.4 Minutes of Regular Meeting of August 3 1993 Approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 3, 1993, as presented. August 17, 1993 5.5 Office on Aging Title III Contract - County of Riverside Approved the contract and receipt of grant in the amount of $7,009 for fiscal year 93/94 and adopted Resolution No. 2156 authorizing the City Manager as designated signer of documents. RESOLUTION NO. 2156 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO TO DESIGNATE THE PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN DOCUMENTS RELATED TO 'TITLE III-B G FOR 0 CH SERVICES 5.6 Ordinance No. 984 -Change of Zone 3-93 (Parcel Two) Waived the reading in full, and read by title only, and adopted Ordinance No. 984, approving Change of Zone 3-93. CE NO. 984 AN ORDI CE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE 3-93, FOR A 12.62 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF - • NA EXPRESSWAY AND SANDERSON AVENUE, AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO 5.7 Bid Award - Seventh Street Water & Sewer Line Moved to City Departments - Item 7.1 5.8 Large Meter Installation - Temporary Employees Extended the length of employment for the two temporary water department employees from four months to six months. 5.9 Bid Award - First Street Earthquake Damage Awarded contract to Alford & Puyear in the amount of $2,618.00 for repair of curb, gutter and sidewalk; and Award contract to E. W. Harmon, Inc., in the amount of $9,125.00 for street pavement, manhole and cross gutter. At the hour of 7:57 P.M. Council recessed. At the hour of 8:02 P.M. Council reconvened. 6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS 6.1 Conditional Use Permit 2-91 (Continued from July 6, 1993) Applicant: Intermac - Surface Mining adjacent Soboba Road east of Gilman Bridge. Community Development Director McNabb made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. Staff distributed copies of the July 6, 1993, report and reviewed the minutes of the meeting of July 6, 1993, in an effort to address the issues raised by 4 August 17, 1993 Council. Staff recommended specific language to address reclamation of the previously mined area if Council approves the permit. Mayor Hafliger opened the public hearing. Kelli Politoske, Representing Applicant - San Jacinto Development Company, and advised that the application had already been approved by operation of law under the Permit Streamlining Act, subject to the conditions of approval by the Planning Commission on December 11, 1991. Stated they would like to proceed in a positive fashion and hoped this was as dear to everyone else as it was to them. In the interest of harmony was available to answer questions. Stated her phone number and encouraged those with questions to call. Stated she wanted to express the same willingness to work with the City as she expressed in the past. Roger Morgan, Applicant, aside from the comments of Ms. Politoske, advised the he had always wanted to be a good neighbor. They had been in operation for 12 years and had invested millions of dollars in the community in good faith. Expressed a desire to work with the residents of the Soboba Corridor and was not really interested in being in the sand and gravel business but was really for grading for further development. However, the residents would not find it to be in the best interest of the community to quit the project half way through. They have no desire to be in the mining interest and would like to develop the property. Felt that after two years and a cost of $800 a day in interest, plus the cost of studies, did not feel good about the seemingly adversarial relationship and would like to work with the community to develop the property when grading done, especially since his own activities had been involved in high tech products. Stated he had placed Ms. Politoske in charge in an effort to improve the relationship. Their future plans dealt with tourism and a trade center which would contribute to the Inland Empire. However, those who were there to oppose or impose more conditions, the may be moot, since there were already so many conditions, more than any other project in history, and it could make it economically impossible and more difficult. Felt that after two years and four public hearings, they deserved their permit in the spirit of cooperation. Stated that opponents had not appeared before the Planning Commission, which put forward some very tight restrictions. Reserved his right to rebuttal. Muriel Dufresne, Golden Era Productions, voiced concern with project because of the scarring of the mountain side and the excessive traffic it would cause on Highway 79. Felt the developer did not fulfill promises to reseed the mountain side and that was why it looked that way. August 17, 1993 Shirley Riner, stated she was present again to request denial for the applicant to resume mining. It was her contention the Intermac never followed through with what was asked before, and wanted to know what assurance was there that they would now. Concerned about traffic, air pollution, noise and the road damage. Wth regard to the letter from Steve Kupferman (County Geologist), dated April 18, 1991, which indicated concern regarding the instability of the mountain and that no building be done. Stated there had been conflicts regarding the distances in question, and felt that 350 feet from the base was too high, and inquired how far back they intended to mine? Stated that on numerous occasions they had been told the mountain would be reclaimed, and it was seeded 3-4 years ago, but that it was washed away and nothing more had been done. Inquired why it had not been reseeded? Previously inquired where the plans were for an industrial complex and was told the applicant did not want to spend the money until approval had been received from the City. In all fairness, suggested that the Council look at the applicant's track record and failed agreements and request an EIR on the project. Robert Reents, Representing Mountain View Homeowner Committee (106 members) indicated that traffic was a primary concern. Further, that trucks speed by as high as 70-75 past the front of their development and if they were to pull out they would be run over. Indicated that some of the traffic was from the gravel pit at the Indian Reservation, but that a great deal were from the applicant's site. Stated that with Sanderson closed and the bridge not in, a tremendous amount of traffic was being diverted. There had already been a few accidents which tied up the limited access to the valley, and resulted in a good deal of traffic congestion. Citing environmental issues, identified the noise, dust and traffic. Stated that with the road widening, the traffic will move closer to the homes. Stated that for the last few years the road had been in extremely poor shape and city staff just recently began the process of repairs. Wth the renewed activity of mining as proposed the road would once again deteriorate. Residents were literally embarrassed to have company to their homes down Soboba Road because it was so unsightly. Stated the land had been scarred and just recently a building had been bulldozed and never cleaned up and the residents were left looking at the mess. He supported job generation and intended no offense to Mr. Morgan, he would be opposed to any mining operation at the same location. Urged that the area be used for something which would be good for everybody in the community. Rob Lindquist, stated he had a lot in common with Mr. Morgan, they were both businessmen and owned real estate. However, they differed in that Mr. Lindquist was a resident and knew what a mountain was. Stated that not much could be done with vertical real estate, and could assure anyone, that stepping a vertical slope with a 1.5 to 1 August 17, 1993 embankment, would not reclaim a quarried mountainside in anything less than an ethical time frame. Stated that hydro -seeding would not work without flattening our the mountain and diverting water from the MWD portal to keep sand and gravel wet enough to support life. Stated that some had his earlier report entitled "North Mountain - Appeal To he Trustees Of A Beautiful City", which was a little more objective than his delivery. However, he followed his efforts to bring common sense and a depth of vision to the never ending practice. His report, with its aesthetic point of view, placed the burden of trustee of an irreplaceable asset on the shoulders of the day to day decision makers. It was his hope they could appreciate that the proposal, by what it could do to change the valleys unravaged appearance, merited more than a cursory environmental waiver. There was no comfort in knowing their responsibility as deciders of the public's fate, would outlast the latest confrontation with Mr. Morgan. Wth approval of the mining permit they may send the applicant back north happy, with a patentedly unworkable list of contrived remedies and slope treatments, but, he would be back on schedule for years to come. Worse, so would thousands of valley residents, old and new, who would look upon the crime on North Mountain as an act of vandalism far more repugnant and durable than graffiti or any number of more extemporaneous civic outrages. Roger Morgan, Applicant Rebuttal, stated that many meetings had been held to hear residents concerns and explain their situations, and now felt they had been wasted on some individuals. Stated that Mr. Kupferman had signed off on the application, applicant had spent thousands for a slope stability analysis which Mr. Kupferman found legitimate and that the mountain would not come down. The proposal would only be 100 feet higher than it was already, a total of 350 from the base, with the western side complete already. Stated they did not break any promises, they had been waiting for Edison to relocate the poles, which was delayed due to the inability to obtain easements. Stated he broke no promises because the mining had not been completed yet. It was not his desire to not have the project look as good as it could. Offered plans and blueprints to Mr. Reents and Ms. Riner. Stated that they had come to the City regarding their future plans and it was the City desire to take a lead role for the Soboba Corridor Plan, but they were unable to get a dialogue going and could not afford to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to try to find out what the community wanted in the area. If the City wanted parks in the area, which was not what they purchased it for, then the City could purchase it, but the applicant was not going to pay interest on property while the City tried to decide. Stated that had done all the environmental studies and it was useless at that point to request an EIR, which would kill the project. Wth regard to the traffic, for a while the main problem was the indian reservation which had a prolific contract with Robertson's Ready Mix. Stated that for 12 years or more, the area had been designated a mining area, long before residents located there. August 17, 1993 Desired to work out of that type of business because they never made any money on the operation, the only difference was that the mining helped to offset some of the costs related to development of the site. Stated the benefit to the community was the availability of materials locally to keep costs down. Obtaining the materials would reduce the impact on Soboba Road but would cost the rest of the community. Advised that they had the turkey farm torn down, but the contractor went bankrupt and did not complete removal of the debris. However, there were also many other developers which had not finished work due to the economic situation. Stated that he had bought into the project after the land had been scarred and there was nothing he could do to make it go away. Stated they just wanted to mine the bottom and redaim when complete. They would then develop the area to be useful to the community but could not do so if they just drop the mining operation in the middle of it. Stated that the scarring was a temporary condition, but if the pen -nit were denied it would be a permanent condition. Stated they had serious economic conditions and could lose the property and the community could deal with new owners. If the permitted uses were removed from the land it would be impossible for anybody else to do anything with it. Stated if the residents of the Soboba Country Club had an ax to grind, in 12 years of operation, there had not been one serious complaint. Most are angry with the Quandt project and the past. Stated that alternate routes had been looked at to circumvent Soboba Road, which City staff knew about. Suggested that alternate routes were something they needed to work together on. Councilmember Ford inquired if the applicant had heard anymore from MWD people regarding their concerns? Mr. Morgan advised that they had expected a response prior to the meeting, but the individual involved was still on vacation. Did not believe there were any problems that they could not work out with their neighbors. Identified the proposal to go all the way to State Street and across the street and would like to take the remaining fill to bring the grade level and provide 75 acres of usable land. Community Development Director McNabb advised an MWD representative was in the audience if there were any questions. Les Barrett, Metropolitan Water District (MWD), stated he had been reviewing the proposal and stated the drainage and silt situation currently warranted a geo-technical report on what came down. The proposal suggests the applicant wants to raise embankments adjacent to their property which may alter the drainage pattern from the valley above, but they were not in a position to determine the effects. Stated that in 1990, about 136 cubic yards of silt was deposited in that area and they were August 17, 1993 concerned as neighbors and felt that perhaps more direct deposits would result on their property. They have a structure on site and were concerned regarding rocks and debris falling and would work with the developer to mitigate the problems. There being no further speakers wishing to present testimony, Mayor Hafliger closed the public hearing. City Attorney Cox, in response to Council request for clarification regarding the applicants statements on the permit streamlining act and the approval by operation of law, advised there was a difference of opinion on the effects of the law, or a different understanding by their Counsel, stating the public agencies 180 day time limit, rather than having a 6 month limit acting in their own right as the lead agency. Felt the provision of the law was somewhat ambiguous and could not foretell what the decision would be if litigated. Believed some significant arguments could be made that the time limit currently was timely and within the 6 months. Stated there were significant issues regarding the conduct and actions consisting of waivers on the part of the applicant, and that Council had authority to take action at the present time, based on information he had. Ms. Politoske inquired if the application was deemed complete in 1991, what 6 month time limit the City Attorney was referring to? Mr. Cox advised he was not sure what she meant. Stated that some time ago the applicant had tabled matter and requested it be removed from the calendar and consented that it be removed from consideration by the Council. Ms. Politoske stated that the 6 months had ran out prior to that, talking about the duration of 1991, once the application was deemed complete. Councilmember Williams stated most of the Council was not in that position in 1991, thus not privy to those prior discussions. However, he had participated in the particular project, visited the site a couple times and read all the staff reports and supporting documentation for which he had brought up his own issues, as follows; past performance of applicant, environmental issues, i.e., geological stability of the mountain, the aesthetics (mountain scarring), the future of North Mountain, the future development and what form may be appropriate. Did not feel there was anything to convince him that the future development could occur on the site under the terms of the proposed plan. Felt the mining operation would impact the type of building the applicant planned and had not seen anything since the prior meeting to address that concern. Applicant had stated that the conditions were as determined by the Planning Commission and had no interest to do anything more than had 9 August 17, 1993 already been done. While he was sympathetic to the costs of the project, he considered that to be a cost of doing business. Felt that a project such as proposed, and what happened to the mountain, would impact the community for years, centuries, longer than any of the current people would be around, so the decision and ultimate outcome of the mountain was not to be taken lightly. Considered the stability to be a significant unresolved factor. Felt this was significant and should not be glossed over. Heard the concerns of residents regarding traffic and other environmental impacts and felt those played an important role in the decision making process. With the overall economic concerns statewide, favored projects which bring revenue and jobs to the community, but the proposal transcended a purely economic outcome. Based on those issues he had grave concerns regarding the viability of the project and whether it was right for the community and believed it was not. Environmental issues had not been sufficiently addressed. Councilmember Ford disagreed, indicating he had read the reports and talked to City staff and was quite impressed with the decision of the Planning Commissionand agreed with them. Stated the Planning Commission had done a thorough review, consulting individuals from within and outside the community. Felt the Planning Commission had done an active, interested and good job of trying to figure out what was best for the City of San Jacinto and the citizens. Requested that the Council approve the Planning Commission recommendation subject to the conditions of approval and findings of fact. Councilmember Williams clarified that he was not taking anything away from the Planning Commission on the job they did. The point was, did the City want a nine on the side of the mountain and it was a policy decision which was a Council decision, not a Planning Commission decision. Felt the Planning Commission roles was to determine what would be necessary for a given development. The Council decision was whether or not a mine would serve the best interest of the City residents, and he did not believe it did at the present time. Mr. McNabb responded to Mayor Hafliger's inquiries regarding Mr. Kupferman's report of April, 1991 as follows: 1. Regarding the concerns and desire for a subsurface engineering investigation for the potential landslides, the technical reports and monitoring equipment were not required prior to mining. The monitoring would be in place for mining and a report prepared based upon those results. 2. The additional slope stability and investigation for the on site mining would be done down the road if the applicant came up with a plan. 10 August 17, 1993 3. The Fault Hazard would be prepared in accordance with the Special Study Zone Act prior to occupancy on site. Regarding the MWD structure, it was pre-existing and must have a minimum of 2080 man hours per year and be a distance of 50 feet from the fault, as well as some other mitigation. 4. Mr. Morgan's comments that the scar would remain forever, the obligations of the expired CUP would still require reclamation of the already mined area whether approved or not. Councilmember Solaria felt it was quite evident the issue could be discussed forever and there were many issues which needed to be addressed. However, if the applicant felt there was some devious motivation to prevent the mining permit, he wanted the record to show there was in essence a new Council and that whatever stipulations or courtesies granted to any developer would be on the level of quality of the project, regardless of who they are, where they are coming from. The applicant had stated that unless the permit was approved, they had no intention of addressing the issues which would place the City in a position of no return. Requested that the faxed memo dated July 29, 1993 from the applicant be entered into the record, and unless they had misinterpreted the intentions and they did not address the concerns, he agreed with Councilmember Williams. Mayor Hafliger reopened the public hearing at the request of the applicant to speak. Roger Morgan felt it was time to deal with the real issues. Stated they never said they would not deal with valid concerns regarding the property. Was sensitive to Mr. Williams concerns regarding past performance but felt that it had been a witch hunt all along and he would rather work with the KGB than to get into mining. Stated they had not been aware of any problems in 12 years of operation. Only two issues had ever come up; 1) a bulldozer operator had over cut the slope because he was not aware of the building codes, and 2) the redamation bond problems, which was due to some land ownership issues, in which an option was offered to the City to use the land as collateral. Felt the real issue was not the sand and gravel operation or the investment of money in the community, related plans for development across the street and indicated a willingness to work with MWD. Stated he had been hearing from Mayor Hafliger they had been out of compliance for 8 years. He requested that if that was true to be specific on the issues of non-compliance. Councilmember Williams stated that he did not say the CUP conditions had not been met. Gave an example of past situations such as the 11 August 17, 1993 reclamation. Mr. Morgan stated that reclamation was not required until the mining was complete. Further, they had reseeded and were not obligated to do so... Mayor Hafliger called point of order and stated he would not allow a debate to ensue. Mr. Morgan stated that he had to endure a lot of things which were inappropriate during the last 2 1/2 years. Stated that Mr. Hafliger did not like him and carries a folder of news dippings on him. Further, that Mr. Morgan was not dishonest, maybe less intelligent, but had invested all of his money and tried to do a good job in good faith and there was nothing they had done to deserve what they got. They could not stop in middle of the project and would do their level best to reseed and leave if that was desired. He only wanted fair treatment, he knew about defamation of character and the grand jury mess. Research had been done and his name was being defiled unmercilessly. Consulting with his attorney, he advised it was the constitutional right to reach public officials. He was not one to pass judgment, but some Councilmembers had not given Ms. Politoske time to hear her and not all the Council information came from staff reports or from the applicant. Les Barrett, MWD, requested to raise two issues, 1) three Councilmembers talked about geo-technical reports, their value and who signed them. Stated that MWD also had concerns in that area and were very concerned about their structure with emphasis placed on geo- technical sliding and landfill and have requested their own studies and recommendations to institute a new system of safety. Their report recommended that they build a complete roof structure to assure against future landslides because of the potential there, and 2) Requested that any transportation, mining, and pipelines, or any proposal in the area across the street, be severely looked at. He mentioned this because it was brought up by the applicant. Mayor Hafliger stated the debris flow related to previous questions, that it came from the applicants property and onto MWD property, which resulted in debris spread only on MVVD property and a change to the natural drainage. Felt the matter needed to be looked at and evaluated. Robert Reents addressed the issue that nobody had complained in 12 years. Stated that the site had not looked as it currently did in 12 years and at some point a complaint would occur, such as it had. Further, many people feel intimidated and it was difficult for an individual to come before a legislative body and address the group. However, he represented 106 who had signed in opposition to the proposal. They were tired of developers tearing up the countryside and then leaving. 12 Quoted the applicant as stating he would put in a camp ground and a tram up the mountain. He did not feel it would be done, it was not financially feasible. Felt they were just promising a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow which would never come, and asked the applicant to prove it. There being no further speakers, Mayor Hafliger closed the public hearing. Councilmember Williams requested to clarify what had occurred. Stated that a bond was never submitted for the reclamation and explained the incident so there was no confusion. Stated further, that in response to that Mr. Morgan attacked his character and suggests that he was less than forthright and honest in his view of the project. Stated his information came from staff reports, and for the record, no magic fairy came out of the air to give him information and he felt comfortable with his decision. Regarding his availability to hear the applicant on the project, he received one call which he returned. He worked for a living and always made room within his schedule to meet and the inability to do so was no slight to the project. All know he has an open door policy. Did not think the project was right at the present time for the community and apparently the community shared that view. Councilmember Ford wanted to only see a cooperative effort to work for the benefit of the City, County, State, and the United States. Felt some thinking was if the project was not done their way they would not cooperate. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Ford to approve the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve CUP 2-91 subject to finds of fact and conditions of approval. Motion failed for lack of second. Based on the fact that the applicant indicated the mining was for the purpose of future development of the site, yet no studies had been performed which showed the site was developable. As such, the City Council was not willing to approve the scarring of hillside for no other reason than a sand and gravel mine. A MOTION was made by Councilmember Williams, seconded by Councilmember Solorio, to deny CUP 2-91, Intermac Surface Mining. Motion carried on a 3-1 vote with Councilmember Ford dissenting and Councilmember Leahy absent. City Attorney Cox received clarification that the denial was outright, not without prejudice. The hour was 9:10 P.M. 13 August 17, 1993 6.2 O.K and Associates Cost of Living Rate Adjustment Assistant to the City Manager Anderson made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. Mayor Hafliger opened the public hearing. There being no speakers wishing to present testimony, Mayor Hafliger closed the public hearing. In response to Council inquiries, Mr. Anderson advised a new tracking system had been instituted for complaints. Advised that complaints were being addressed promptly and most were resolved satisfactorily. Advised that equipment was being overhauled, tuned up and that new uniforms were being obtained. Mr. Ognesian advised that new truck would be ready in 3-6 months, everything was getting monthly check ups and the books were up to date. A MO11ON was made by Councilmember Williams, seconded by Councilmember Solorio, to approve a rate adjustment of 2.8%, increasing the refuse residential base rate from $9.26 to $9.52 per month, effective August 1, 1993. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Councilmember Leahy absent. At the hour of 9:15 P.M. Council recessed. At the hour of 9:30 P.M. Council reconvened. 6.3 Reprogramming of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Projects Public Works Director Evans made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. Mayor Hafliger opened the public hearing. There being no speakers wishing to present testimony, Mayor Hafliger closed the public hearing. Mr. Evans recommended a change to reprogram $74,476.45 to Seventh Street water line project, $39,204.60 to Main Street sidewalk project. Advised figures included $6,000 for installation of new doors at the community center to meet ADA regulations. A MO11ON was made by Councilmember Williams, seconded by Councilmember Ford, to reprogram $74,476.45 from the Downtown Water Line Project to the Seventh Street Water and Sewer Line Project; 14 August 17, 1993 and reprogram $39,204.60 from the Downtown Water Line Project to the Main Street sidewalk project. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Councilmember Leahy absent. 6.4 General Plan Amendment 2-93 (Continued from August 3. 1993) Mayor Hafliger opened the public hearing. No speakers present wishing to present testimony. A MO11ON was made by Councilmember Solorio, seconded by Mayor Hafliger, to continue the public hearing to the meeting of October 9, 1993. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Councilmember Leahy absent. 7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS Consent Item 5.7 Moved to 7.1 7.1 Bid Award - Seventh Street Water & Sewer Line Public Works Director Evans made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. Advised that total funding would be from CDBG funds. A MO11ON was made by Councilmember Ford, seconded by Councilmember Wlliams, to award the bid for construction to A.S. Peich of Pomona in the amount of $230,860.00 and authorized the Mayor to sign the contract. Motion carried on a 4-0 vote with Councilmember Leahy absent. 8.0 MAYOR/ COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS 8.1 Expenditure Request - Councilmember Leahy Councilmember Williams apologized and advised that he was not requesting financial assistance for registration fees for the League of Cities conference and requested that he be deleted from the consideration. Council concerns: 1. Need to stick with original agreement. Felt Council should not deny funds channeled for City staff. Could not support such a request. 15 August 17, 1993 Council consensus not to address the request. Mayor Hafliger advised that a Ground Water Association meeting was held and Public Works Director Evans was assigned on the Task Force to work with other agencies to work towards goals and a program for recharging the underground basin, which would probably take a couple years to resolve. City Manager Easter advised of the ground breaking at Sanderson for the bridge the next day at 10:00 AM, the Stater Bros. Grand Opening the following Wednesday, and the joint meeting with the Planning Commission the following Tuesday. Councilmember Williams commended staff, their attitude and morale in spite to the budgetary situations. Stated the road patching was going well and commended all of staff for the dedicated efforts to beautify the City. 9.0 CLOSED SESSION At the hour of 9:40 P.M. Council convened in closed session, with Councilmembers Ford and Leahy absent, pursuant to the following: 9.1 Personnel Matters Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 At the hour of 9:55 P.M. Council reconvened in open session with all members present except Co.uncilmembers Ford and Leahy, and announced no action being taken. 10.0 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to conduct the meeting was adjourned. The hour of adjournment being 9:56 P.M. Submitted by Richard Brewer, City Clerk Approved by Henry Hafliger, Mayor 16 AGENDA STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Richard Brewer, City Clerk Via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: October 5, 1993 SUBJECT: Minutes of Special Meeting of August 24, 1993 RECOMIVIENDATION Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of August 24, 1993, as presented. MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE SAN JACINTO FINANCING AUTHORITY AUGUST 24, 1993 1.0 CALL TO ORDER The Special Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Mayor Hafliger at the Community Center, 625 S. Pico, San Jacinto, California. Present: Councilmembers Ford, Leahy, Solorio, Williams, and Mayor Hafliger Absent: None 2.0 ORDER OF BUSINESS 2.1 PLANNING COMMISSION VACANCIES A MOTION was made by Councilmember Williams , and seconded by Councilmember Solorio to accept the resignations of Planning Commission members Rutledge and Taylor, and directed the City Clerk to advertise those two positions as vacant, in addition to the expiring term of Commissioner Hixson , in accordance with the Maddy Act . The motion was carried on a 5-0 vote. 2.2 E.M.W D. SOBOBA PASS THROUGH AGREEMENT A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, and seconded by Councilmember Ford, authorizing the Mayor to sign the first Implementation Agreement of the Soboba Redevelopment Agency. The motion was carried on a 5-0 vote. 3.0 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to conduct of the Special Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council the meeting was adjourned. The hour of adjournment being 9:19 pm. Approved by Submitted by Richard Brewer, City Clerk Mayor Deputy City Clerk AGEND STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor and City Council }ROM: Anna A. Vega Finance Director Via Pamela S. Faster, City Manager SUBJECT: Approval of Register of Audited Demands and Payroll Checks DATE: October 05 , 1993 RECOMEN DATION Approve warrant numbers 35418 through 35560 dated September 30, 1993 in the amount of $348,646.53 and Payroll check numbers 1189 through 1285 dated September 17, 1993 in the amount of $89,202.74 SUMMARY A listing of accounts payable warrants is attached for your review and approval. Payroll information is available for your review in the Finance Department. PREPARED 9/30/93, 0:0640 City of San Jacinto PAGE PROGRAM 0M313U ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST GROUP NUMBER : 00050 Sc:piember 30 A/P ACCOUNTING PERIOD/YEAR03/1994 GROUP OGEE ------ANNE-- Tows-4 TRANS DATE VOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NUMBER PROJ P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT DUE DATE CHECK -4-- CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 100 9/20/1993-- 001037 00 010-3100-431.33-30 —0000946 A-1 LOCK & KEY SERVICE :I.O534 27.16 - i.e Cab Lock-P.D. 9/30/1993 0000000 200 9/13/1993 001038 00 010-3100-431.31-20 0000779 ADLERHORST REQ. 30.00 0eminar/K-9 Handler Brian Vig 4/30/1993 0000000 N 300 8/15/1993 001039 00 010-3100-431.34-10 00-00977-All Cty Paging, Inc. - STMT. 93.50 Pagers-P.D. 9/30/1993 0000000 N 400 9/02/1993 001040 00 010-7400-425.33-10 0000935Lfli.iIARROYD STMT, 625.00 JanitoriaL Services September 1993 9/30/1993 000p000 N 500 9/08/1993 001041 00 010-3100-431.36-50- 0004-006 AT & T LANGUAGE -LINE - STMT. - 50:00— Monthly Fee -Language Line Service-P.D. 9/30/1993 0000000 N 600 9/14/1993 001042-00 010-3100-431-.31-25 0000953 BARRY BACKLUND REQ. 660.00' Crisi Communications Seminar posT Reimbursable 9/30/1993 . 0000000 N 700 9/13/1993 001043 00 010-3100-431.31-25 0001., BONNEVILLE TRAVEL- - REQ. 104;00-- Aiyfaie-Stolz/POST Reimb. Writing Course 9/30/1993 0000000 N noo 9/13/1993 001044 00 096--9700-470.31-20-. ------- ---ooq(4-57-TioNNEvILLF. TRAVEL 1231342 203.00 Airfare -Pat Williams Econ Devlp.-Arizona 2/30/1993 0000000 N 900 4/13/1993-001045 0-0 096-9700-470.31-20 00001137-BONNEVILTE-TRAVEL - 1205041 283.L - Airfare -Pamela Easter Econ Dev 1 P t -Ar i zona 9/30/1993 0000000 N 1000 9/13/1993 001046 00 096-9700-470.31-n 0000157 BONNEVILLE TRAVEL 123045 305.00 Airfare-HenrY Hafliger Econ Deylp.-Arizona 9/30/1993 0000000 1100 9/16/1993 00104? 00 010-2500-425.21-10 0000010 PITNEY DOWES 948878 40.01 Postage Meter Rental 9/30/1993 0000000 1200 9/16/1993 00104' ' 0 010-3100-431.21-10 -- --- ' opqmq pITNEY BOWES 940070 40.00 - Postage Meter Rental 9/30,(1FW'090900 N —1300 9/16/1993 001049 00 05S-4170-450.21-10 0000W10 PIINET BOWES 948678 40.00--- Postage Meter Rental 9/30/1993 0000000 N 1400 9/16/1993 001050 00 050-9000=450.21-10 0000liao PITNEY-BOWE6 948078 40.00-- 1-ostage Meter Rental 9/0/1?94 p000000 1;00 9,,09/199.4 001051 Ob 076-9f00=4/0.31-.20 CMDTA Quarterly Meeting Lisa Reeder 9/30/1993 ZCETFURNTM1.,N TTOU 0000000 'REPARED 9/30/93. 0:06;4E City of San Jacinto PAGE 2 '16 PROGRAM GM313U ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST . . , GROUP NUMDER 1 00050 September 30 A/P MO ACCOUNTING PERIOD/YEAR: 03/1994 OROUP USER ANNE TRANS1 TRANS DATE uoucHm DK ACCOUNT NUMBER pRnJ P.O. vrismoR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NumBER DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 DUE: DATE CHECK0 CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 1600 9/37/1993 001052 00 019-3100-431.33-50 0000216 CAR WASH DEPOT 501.5 City Vehicle Naeh 9/30/1.993 0000000 1700 9/13/1993 001053 00 010-1210-412.30-90 — 0000219 THE-COUNSFLING TEAM 7-93 Psychological Reserve Officer -PA!. 9/30/1993 0000000 'N 1000 5/05/1993 001054 00 010-3100-471.34-05 0000238 COM SEE CO. 110593017 Radio Monthly Maintenance Police Department 9/30/1993 0000000 N 1900 5/05/1.973 001055 00 055-4170-450.34-05 ." -0000238""COM-SFR Ccl. 110603043 Radio Monthly Maintenance Public WockiB 9/30/1993 0000000 2000 5/05/1993 001056 00 024-4150-410.34-05 0000238 COM SEE CO. M0603043 Radio Monthly Maintenance Public Worke 9/30/1993 0000000 . 2100 5/05/1993 001057 00 025-7100-410.34-05 0000238-COM 5ER CO; MA603047 Radio Monthly Maintenance Public Works 9/30/1993 0000000 7200 5/05/1993 001050 00 010-3200-431.34-05 0000230 COM SER CD. M0597935 Radio Monthly Maintenance Fig.ci Department 9/30/1993 0000000 2300 5/05/1993 001059 00 010-4100-410.34-05 0000230-COFCSER CO. MA597074 Radio Monthly Maintenance Building 6 Planning 9/30/1993 0000000 2400 5/05/1993 001060 00 010-3100-431.34-05 0000238 COM SEE CO. MA593874 Radio MonithLY Maintenance Building 6 Planning 9/30/1993 0000000 —2500 8/31/1993 001061. 00 039-4155-410;30-90 0000751COX-ZS COX STMT. City Attorney -Legal Serv. 9/30/1993 0000000 2600 0/31/1993 001062 00 020-2200-419.70-91 0000251 COX 6 COX STMT. City Attorney -Legal Secv, 9/30/1.993 0000000 2700 0/31/1993 001063 00 036-3100-431.30-95 0000251. COX 6 COX STMT. City Attorney -Legal Senv, 9/30/1993 0000000 2000 0/31/1993 001064 00 042-8501-450.30-90 0000251 COX 6 COX STMT. City Attorney -Legal Senv. 9/30/1993 0000000 2900 8/31/1993 001065 00 010-1111-411.30-14 0000251 COX 6 cox 51117. City Altorney-Lega1 Serv. 9/30/1993 0000000 .---3000 9/0171993 001066 00 025-7255-410.3321 oO0o�3 B & . LnNOSCAFE 6 MAINTEN 9993 AMOUNT 101.00 135.00 437.85 49,90 49.9n 49.99 106.10 43405 43405 1,001456 724.22 130.00 33.419 2,981.76 160.00 0 • • 0 0 Repair Valve-Soboba 9/70/1993 0000000 0 0 REPARED 9/30/93: D:06:48 PROGRAM 0:13131.l GROUP NUMBER 00050 September 30 A/P ACCOUNTING PERIOD/YEAR: 03/1994 OkOUP USER ANNE City of San Jacinto PAGE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST TRANSO TRANS DATE VOUCHER BD ACCOUNT NUMBER PRAT F.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMDER DESCRIPTION I. DESCRIPTION 2 DOE DATE CHECKCHET'S< DATE TYPE LAST TRANS --------. AilffHq 3:1.00 9/01/1993 001067 00 025-7257-410.33-24 0000263 D & J LANDSCAPE & MAINTEN 9992 275.00 Repair Sp) inkley System Ramorn3 ExPrwaY 9/30/1993 0000000 N 3200 9/01/4993 001060 00 027-7250-410.33-21 0000263 D & j LANDSCAPE & MAINTEN 9994 41000 Repair SprinkLer System MiLasot Pa lee 9/30/1993 0000000 II 3300 9/01/1993 001069 00 02P-1150-410.31-05 0000263 D & J LANDSCAPE & MAINTEN 9979 770,00 LandAree Maintenance kamona E)',De1,'./E.,1101A 9/30/1993 0000000 N 3400 9/01/1993 001070 00 025-7250-410.33-71 0000263 D & J LANDSCAPE & MAINTEN 9970 311;4,00 Landscape Maintenance San Jacinto West 9/30/1993 0000000 N 3500 9/01/1993 001071 00 025-72513410.33-71 0000263 Li & J LANDSCAFE L. MATNTEN 7970 414.00 Landscape Maintenance Heritage Ranch 9/30/1793 0000000 N 3600 9/01/1993 001072 00 02597252-410.33-71 0000263 D & J LANDSCAPE 17. MAINTEN 9970 1.110.00 Landscape Maintenance American 7)it1age 9/30/1993 0000000 N 3700 9/01/1993 001073 00 025-7253-410.33-71 0000263 D & J LANDSCAPE & MAINTEN 9970 300,00 Landscape Maintenance Park HilI ViLtage 9/30/1993 0000000 N 3800 //01/1993 001074 00 025-7254-410.33-71. 0000263 D & J LANDSCAPE & MAINTEN 9770 160.00 Landscape Maintenance Ann Arbor 9/30/1993 0000000 N 3900 7/01/1993 00107'e 00 OZ0.--7255-410,33 -71 0000263 D & J LANDSCAPE & MAINTEN 9971] 1,1.10.00 Landscape Maintenom_e Soboba 7/30/1993 0000000 N 4000 9/01/1993 001076 00 025-7257-110.33-71 0000263 Li 17, J LANDSCAPE 6 MAINTEN 9970 3p240,00 Landscape Maintenance Rancho Gan Jacinto 9/30/1993 0000000 N 1100 9/01/1993 00107 00 025-7257-110.37-71 0000263 D & J LANDSCAPE & MAINTUN 9970 930.00 Landscape Maintenance Rancho Son Jacinto 9/30/1993 0000000 N 4200 9/01/1993 001070 00 025-7250-410.33-71 0000263 D & J LANDSCAPE 17, MATNTEN 9970 100.00 Landscape Maintenance IdyLLwiLd 9/30/1993 0000000 N 1300 0/31/1973 001079 00 010-3100-431.30-90 0000260 DAMON REEERENCE LAD 9TMT. 499.40 Lab Fees For August-P.D, 9/30/1993 0000000 N 4400 B/31/1993 00:1.0130 00 096-9700-470.21-40 00007751DE rirms BLUEPRINTING SERV 13970 5,1)2 Olueprintine 901"Vi: Al. I. Departments 9/30/1993 0000000 N 4500 0/31/1993 oolOal 00 029-0661-440.34-A5 0000275 DE BROS DTIEPPINTING SERV 13970 11J,S2 • recic•10,33313, 4,,-70/1,297 0000040 1,1 00 ` 969' 1: i'6' 00 ' 001" 00 ' 1,1' l L1..' 9 1:i]' 4£:°01 S.NIIUSI') ..111AV d N 0000000 ti661/05/6 '.LW.LS .1.L1.A HD d0 JSIIUH L61,:c10000 N 0000000 £661:/0£:/6 'THIS A.LII'JIIU .J0 _1S00H L6a•0000 II 0000000 5'661:/O '.1.4.113 A.L:L OIIU AO 381100 L61.0000 P1 0000000 '.Ll•!1S A.1.1:-1VfIN .:dla JS)I0H L680000 N ' 1.W.l.:S 0000000 i66 ./0Y_/6= A.1.1-1JnIU JO ASIIUII L600000 1 1 V -.<a l...t,,,1 0 l ::r I t(.:>r'1 0@!-..ii51t--OL_Tt'--000 00 6601:00 0661:/41:/6 0019 09--1:F 'O la--O . I):1,1a0 1'IV-`111_re..:l ;;ale'1t1;'4rS (5T00 r.661/41/6 0009 c'S:41 -'6:10 00 :o0▪ 'COO 0661/91/6 006'a C • 1 1 b',...G l...e t',.:1 >I ::t 1 t.I;;rr1 411-166.0::t•-'AI11741- 6T0 00 460100 5'h61:/bT/6 0011` ;a) :: 1 sa6 C0 00 11.060100 Ee.61:/41/6 N 0000000 i1661/OL/6 a oll.e::tl unwwo,.) 1:;Iii; .11) •al gt=<.:i_tn (:111, >.:I .L)i'tOd 'U:d21 '0>1:7IH AiiNti'J £LO i00o e:oo... 1: 5I'TET--.00TR--010 00 60100 £661/1.1:/6 009'8• 11 0000000 I:661:/00/6 s1-t'.1_.. II '= daa) I _i o.j. eu.,t;rl.-I',) 96!3o'I: AA1:ft`:I:SI'J '101. )1 CI::J'I:<I ,L.00 1H LSE0000 I:)i: i:.. '000 'v)10 00 46OTOO 'r:661:/11'0/6 (0.:IS) II 0000000 1661/(W/6 'i'.iil):I S1:LL.JI S:a "1V:d9.`.l JNINIET 9600000 N 0000000 £:661/02./6 Nl1W?i:i3F'IS TAFF 14 Sf 19?l00 6840000 N S:6/L/6 NON,Jlit-IS V 1.:::1001.::] N(:1511FJ>JJ:J 6U40000 N 6/, NU.I..LO IO:I:JUJ ILJJJ 9L40000 1< 0....0£:' 1)).t "0U_)0 01O 00 0000000 5:661:/051/6 E661 ..16g1.) to u 1 "II 'A i'.6`")vaA CO 1•5_' , _t 0014c.'' OTO 00 060100 £1661. /`,'T,/6 0O4F luen..�rYi �alnirt.t-)1-I. l.utwi r'1 CO :s, _71n_r=a0 1n6 1:6._OI.°6I t...00z7 "CTO 00 B1110100 0661:/L0/6 006S 1 11rnle..1014 t.puawieJO ra❑in_G,as 1F6c9-1 16--0£' 6 f t-i)O 160 00 LSOI00 i'..661 /L..0/f, 00'014 0000000 £66I:/05:•,/6 "...:v1"12Il:a ::Ihl:a N 0000000 0661/00 T6i:1 : SN3.1. CAS; LJfICI 4 A•'.JJNJ 4L01:000 N S _ 0000000 066 I./05_/6 '114.1.114 :'J )Ifl:I1D IOLLd 8V1000II '0LOI000 N 0000000 066 I:/ O}.'/6 o ';''p'::o :1:JINDAS lac A1414 IVSU.JSIiI 1 600000 El rNN':IS ON 1'.I. II:I: 3:1 ]) 11,1 SO:1tI JET 8600000 )INV':I.L. .1.):;V l 81.::IA.1. ":11.b'(I 0G:IJI-C:) tWJANJ :::IAFTWr1I'J :IO1.LihN I 0000000 £:661:/< AIWA (I Fill :l 06--0E'o,.,t-0050-01:O 00 9SO l:0t) >1::,:0 t_g) r.661:/ 1:0/7 1-11I111n_ 000'0 ''I t"W 'A 01:1'....1. l gtr1 V /f.,,.r 0 F.'661/ O1: /6 006V i.0 euu•;al.cytj p'1 r! 6....5..11. i S t _. 00_'c 01O 00 V 01:0i) 1,1....IuO.a uIea1T 008tr c-Ja6-S A!lo, Itch dnuta)I3 l.e'WTT'H 06- IL..1_t (:"01:0-0TO 00 41/101:0<) 4'66'i /H'0/i) 006V. " ) cE9 -`]', O 00 1:00GUO CT NOTidA AWN 4ol!NJt1 N(:)E 116 'O'.::I 0001.I 11l.I1H111IN .1N11000Fo .L.OI"1 3AVlldll 31HVAVd S.LNt103:1V 0.µl I ne1., U' S J.O .d/V 01: de :0';:ai (1 iiu I I.0 I icl.-ni 15) 1: NOT 1 INJEIA1 >O `.1:=11100 i?I'IV):I..1. 1)IJV'1.1. INN") :113Sn .,In(N'a 4/661:/O0 :11V:::IA/E1i11:`:I:11::I ON:LLNLiLK _1V 03000 2:I:FIOI I1N .:I0(:1'1E1 F14:90:GI 'E6/01'/6 t:::l:IV•::I Nd N 030(>000 E66i:,c)1.'n ;.l.L!rkIit.1k;c:lFi 1 I eiit j;i in,.j :•'t:•i---r J..LN 99L0000 o19: • 2.1 t. 0(6I 0 10 r>0 is ): 00 E:' -I' /oo./ oo N 0000000 £661/OE./6 1 •l'<0 E UJU0na l.I.0) .1 <>0 000 • 81161 Z.)InjNjN 9 IL Djl9 9601.000 Q(.13n1 -000l30'9() 00 2 1 2. 10<) E66 C/l)0// 0001.. N 0000000 £61:/00/6 n:lin ni1d ,n-.IUo) 017 (0151 5 11iIi11J9H 0160000 )2 1011 <3U 000'6 <40 0.) 01. I. .00 11661i /60/2.. 00t N 0000000 £661/0E1/6 :1 0 OIl 1.2. :111120w 1J IIVI 6060000 n69E .J() 00 �o 10 yl:/9F/2, 00E16 N 00()0000 £66 [/00/6 .i.n0.wi.tit i7j) 1 •0'21IU 9 U1 >2. 01161118 aJiris al •io SONO] 9690000 :11111:0 1:or 0 i::•o) 10 00 001 I. 0 0 I:/007< 000... 013 016 01 06 06 00 (nO I. 96 011 131, 1. I. .1)119.1 N 0000000 £66(/00/� 1i.nt>inJ : 1 U0 ,'ui11 l/ 1 ii) 2INUI1J12 III. ijy 10) V1 UL90000 <)09E].0t700TE.10F0 00 2012.00 £661/0T/6 0022. N 000)000 0661/00/6 81:01 DM1.81:)) I :11181:2 .si:o o 9 w £ 101:000 N N 31.01)1.1: 0000000 066 [/00/6 ..Ut?t!.1. k..IUH .:.:,.n i ) i,au t, 11. H ii;) .1 •: 001:0 l:oo00101: ro 00 90 I. 10<) £661: /02/2, 0001.. .r.nL-)nIJ7-n.r. yc:1n.j F•ri 1611. OWl II S. lVN f3t,90000 .3.' 031 101' '>000 6)3 0 0<> 300 1.100 £661 /0(>./6 0069 0000000 £621: /00/6 no U 110 : 1 1' II, 1001£ 009 6111)1' (>'90000 110. '/0 061002.6 96<) (0> 101 1(;0 E01 F /20'/ 00139 N 0000000 066 1 /Oo/, .1(11111 . (..j :io I '1 ':1111 01112.) U 1:001:006 ,jIua w • 11 • I 0090000 (>31 00%. 00061/) (0) 001:100 £261:/T 0/6 0069 N 101' 001, N 110101006 0000000 066 1:/CO/I, .10)111 .1,1 e,ui'l.0:::11,11Ufl.t*!l'k '1212012 N I 0090000 0000011'090f.000 0<) 002100 0661/1:0.6 00)99 0000000 066 j: /00./I, .121)11 :j 010 )l ;::Ul'UU3.).0 2W .dlJ0C)W11 I 0090000 o• £O'00U''0!l:0000 00 10)120<) 0661:6:0/6 (>009 N 0000000 0661:/oIl/I, U')) III i,.l .111 . (201101101)01 0011.' 1006 ••1121J12 8'11i 0090000 00 £0 0100000 6)1:0 00 <o:0o> I2n I ." 10/6 0009 N 00001)00 1:661:600/6 'i:rd./001 .1 I U60to .11121.1. oo I .L1lNU.0 IV S AJI12ru-1 0090000 UI..' [111 l:ot .00 i: , 20 (0) 60100 0661/): 0/0 0009 N 0000000 £661:/00/1, l'.;1 12 0II'I tza _).111.1.1 1:30.3.31040 AEI,i;INUL,&v.I.8 131111(111 0090000 0 0' [000010 '110 00 1160 (00 3166 i.,'ooi. 000'' SN'O)J.1.1.S"II 11;l.;IA,1. 22.1.9(1 >112:1)113 oI3::II1::) :l.1.on:1 211111 I r.r(:lr: 1l,;iI(1011113 ::1:J;r:onr'1I :1113401N 6IF)l:11l::)0 1;IC)I1ll'll1i') I) .:l l'lJ66i ;'ll11l',ij IN .1.%402€1:)1311 \IKI l.IlI1)1(l2 11J01 ;I1J I 3:i;I1;lr .:;IrIC16I0 >)::1.1./:1(:Il;.l::I.jI IJN:l:j.NIn[}12129 ,..I./0J <>31 ..l20)l(Ul.. n,l.,.0 (>14000 612:)(•rWnw .lFtlI.''ll) .1.SI'I J.LVl1211111119.AOO SIN) 11)121,19 I')E.'F £80) w0>:Il1126112 Q.Ui:?l" 0125 JO /1!') (It'!90:11 'I'1,/0O,'2, ':IaI.!vd:lloJ REPARETI 9/30/93 r 8 : 06: 48 PROGRAM L3N:3:L:31.1 GROUP NUMBER 00050 Gel: v_n I :o 30 A/1=' ACCOUNTING EL._Ii:C OD/YEAR: 03/1994 GROUP USER ANNIF. City of San Jacinto ACCOUNTS PAYABLE LIF'UATE LIST TRANGO TRANS 1.t)T : VOUCHER DI C ACCOUNT NUMBER I"RfJ 9.0. 01781OR VENDOR NAME: INVOICE NUMBER 7F)<3CI-;:LFT:LON :L DI ;it li:CF iIhN 2 DUE DATE CHECK.' CLIFCI, BATE TYPE LAST TRANS 7700 9 /00/ 1> 93 001113 00 010 _3300-..4 i 1 , 36....`i0 1 e 1.1/010111I_.e.r .a F'urt 0/1/:' A I. 1 ut_r-<at 'hoevi15s 7800 9/033/1993 0011.1.4 Te Leohonr., L.eatiia F'urrhae,e C) 010- 740 0....42. 5 4 F36....50 Alt (1/ '/t' tilieott,.; 0000766 NTEC 9/30/ .1.99�. 0000000 9/30 0000766 NTEC 93 0000000 10474 3:1. ')93 N 2404570.31. 093 PAGE 6 ANOINT 72.<57 7900 9/09/1.993 001115 00 010 00-4. _t,:3fr-'50 0000766 NTFC 210157031097 307,06 Y'e Lel:.lro ncr 1_ ea",e PII-(hA1.1. ut t <-tn.,on-l.si, 9/30/:1.993 0000000 I'1 3000 9/08/1993 001116 00 010--3100....437 36"-lii0 0000766 NTFC; 240457031093 253.1n TE_ Lec.LiLeafie Eurt Itd=sr'• A1.t Department 9/30/:I. 993 0000000 N 5100 9/04.3/'19V3 OO:I.:L:I.'7 00 55 1 70--+ 0..36-S0 0000766 NTFC 210497031097 17 '"77 Telephone L..rr.t,c I'ur. li.t sr,_ ALL CettavTatents 9/30/L993 0000000 N (91200 9/08/1993 001118 00 050--9000---4330.36--50 0000766 NTEC 240433703:1.093 17,77 Telephone I._eatu:te Piff.chafe ALL DePartments Y/,30/:L993 0000000 N D300 9/08/ 1 /93 001119 00 03 0 41 : t:n...4I 0 35_. 50 0000766 NTEC 240457031093 l ::a Letrthn n,, L_e.i. tr P ucy ha.:,c AL I. Cep tr'lm,: v'!'s 9/30/1993 0000000 0 U100 9/Ct1/:1.993 00:I.:1.20 00 01.9-3200..-431..21.._. Veltic to Ci+at tc.r iev, fire Department O'500 9/01/:1.993 {)O I.:111. 00 01.9 a 20' 431.. 21 "74 Vehicle tiiatttt.r Doto Five I(e:.i:tTtmerrrt U600 9/01/'.1.993 001122 00 O19--3100--431.. C....1. Vehicle DaIteries PoLice Department 8700 EI/14/19b93 (tnl 23 00 010 7400- 515.21.-:I7 mmur i lr Cernter. 0000769 NORTON BATT'F157 MF13> CO. 46220 283,92 9/30/1.993 0000000 0 0000769 NORTON BATTERY MEG, Cta. 181.73 141,96 9/:30/:I.1/9'S 0000000 I'J 0000769 NORTON DATT'I):F:Y MEC, CO, 46401. 9/30/:1.993 0000000 hl 0000700 OVERNIGHT INLglC'I 1:73.01 9/30/1993 0000000 Ewa 9/15/1993 001.1.24 00 096 -. 700 470.2I.--1O 0000963 PACIFIC ALARM SV1::. Alarm 57stem .312 IS. Main 9/30/1993 0000000 B900 0/3 L/1993 c t0l 1 2'5: 7C) 012 ta501-.--'-50.30-90 0000796 EAGTFR LAW al. Se;,rs icters:. Einl:rnb. Aces c: 9/30/1993 0000000 2344 :I.363t'; L,I 1:1.4. 46 :704.00 I 00 9000 5/17/1993 001126 00 050.-9000-450.40-01. 0000E102 PARKGON PIPE! ..TNE MT1..13 645534 256.45 Meter W:,ml-,ersc--Water Dept, 9/30/1.993 0000000 N -9:1.0f) 9/01/:1.993 001:1.27 00 0:32.._.73.50....47.0.40...-01. 00001304 PEACOIIK FTNANCIAI... CORP. STMT. tstr ut.. tine ha mt<ae^nuentl i'ia nutn-a I xPrwv Medians 9/30/1993 0000000 L1 REPARED 9/30/93, 0:00:40 Cify of San facinio PAGS: PROGRAM 0M31311 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST GROUP NUMBS : 00050 Seriembay 30 A/P ACCOUNTING PERIOD4AEARt 03/1994 GROUP USER ANNE fRAN0,11: FRANS DATE UOUCHER BK ACCOUNT NIAMEER PROD P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE mumpm DELMdUIlION1. DIC:3i1,1SIJON 2 DUE DATE 1::H1:CK4: CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 9200 940941993 001120 00 070-9000-450.21-90 0000007 LARRY PURGE 03.131-3MING SINT, Wafer Supptiee 9/30/1993 0000000 9300 940141993 001129 9 010-3100-47.1.30490 Anim4143-AinTilet 1993 9400 9/01/1993 00110 00 096-9700-470.30-95 RDA- Consul:Linn Semvice6 Annuef 1993 9500 9401/1993 001131. 00 065-0050-425.20400 RDA -Con6uLfind Seryfce6 AnnueI 1993 9600 9401/1993 001132 00 010-3100-431,21-10 Office SuppLiey, Depactment 9700 0/31/1993 001133 00 096-9700-470.36-27 Ad Economic 0e-ial.opmen1 A4d4eInn1 9E300 `.P./ :I 0 .' :3.992 I01:1.14 00 01.04-,3100-43 .34--10 Rental. Mobil:4: Office -P,D. 9900 9/0311991 00113M 00 021-4150-410,21-55 Redi Csni5efe Work:; 10009 9401/1993 1 .36 ()0 0 :10 3:100-131.31 312: kenosI 0o1fs2 Depi47-11m4o-1 10100 6423.41993 001137 00 020-22004419,30-91 Legal: Service6 Clclimanft Csa.ieda 10200 9/01/1993 001130 00 050-'9000-450.30-90 Fax Notificationn WaLca- DepastmenT 10300 043141993 001139 00 025-.7100 Lainthw:ahe Mainfeniiince 1khrm4n Park 10400 7413/1993 001140 00 061431004411.33-T0 Rhone rinQ DiaLhaftmei-O' 1.0500 9400/1993 001141 00 010-3100-431.33-70 InstoLL 2-Way Radio PoLice DeRaftment 10600 9/03/1993 001142 00 010-3100-431.30-90 Blood Drams -Police 3(33 0000E145 RAMONA ANIMAL. MAVEN STMT. 702,00 9430/1993 0000000 0000040 RGE comirrrTrd wyrt.ormtv! STMT. A,916,10 9430/1993 0000000 00001340 ROB cnrimmrTAl ricvo_ormrm STMT. 2,475.00 9430/1993 0000000 00001383 RIVERSTDF COUNTY SUPPLY 164509 62,54 9/3041993 0000000 000002.5 PRESS -ENTERPRISE STMT. 144.53 9430/1993 0000000 0000922 SCOTSMAN MANUFACTURING CO CPX036790993 710.05 9/30/1993 0000000 0000022 SHARP BHT:DING 17111'F1.Y 42109 96,41 9/30/1993 0000000 0000426 GLENN STUTZ STMT. 4:15.00 9430/1.993 0000000 0000197 THomPsnm 6 COI EUATE 2094-910716 2'11,66 9/30/1993 0000000 0000373 UNDERGROUND SPRVICF ALEPT 93000525 33, 9/30/1991 0000000 0000350 VALLEY RESOURCE 465 60.00 9/3071993 0000000 0001042 L.E. WALBORN STMT. 147.22 9430/1993 0000000 0001059 WEBB COMMUNICATIONS 1006 54.00 9430/1993 0000000 0000317 WESTERN NURSE SPEC. STMT. 360.00 9/30/1993 0000000 REPAREC 9/30/93. 0106140 City of San Jacinto RAGE PROGRAM 60313U ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE ITST GROUP NUMDER 1 0000 ScRiRAR-1- 30 AiR ACCOUNTING PERIOD/YEAR; 03(1994 GROUP USER ANNE IRANS4 1RANS DATE VOUCHER DK AGCOONT NUMPER PROT P.O. UENDOR VENDOR NAME IIETM"'I'EffulJON 1 CESCRI ri rw INVOICE NUMPER AM01141 DUE DATE CHECK' CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 10700 9SR?/I993 00139O 00 019 -1200 -412.33 u00 00002:1.6 CAR WASH DFTTO' City VehifLeNool 9/30/1993 0000000 10000 0/31/1993 001351 00 029-7100-410.30-90 00003t0 VALLEY RESOURCE 466 Tanth;cape Maintenanc& Hoffman Park 9/30/1993 0000000 COUNI1 AMOON11 GROUP TOTALS 107 46,140.09 450.00 RFPARED 9/30/93, 0:06148 Citio of San Jacinto PROGRAM GM31311 611.;nuNTs PAYADLE UPDATE LIST GROUP HUMBER : 00053 Cyepniil A/P 9630-Y3 ACCOUNTING PERIOD/YEAR: 03/1994 GRoup USER ANNE TRAMS4 1R3H13 11161E VOUCHER DI ACCOUNT WUNDER PROJ U. VENDOR VENDOR MAi-: INVOICE NUMBER DESCRIFAION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 100 9/16/1993 00:113 00 010-I407-411.10-03 Accounlin 1eiJuOcino DUE DATE C30EC04: CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 000068 RAY DDOZA 0035410 9/16/1993 II REP. 200 9/17/1993 001114 00 005 0000-101.20-00 0000235 CITY OF CAN JACINTO RED. Het Payfoll 0035119 9/17/1993 300 9/17/1993 001145 oo Iv a Y1 i 11,4 Dept 100 9/17/1993 001146 00 005' 20000 -207-21 -75 Vision Cafe 1nsufance 500 9/17/1993 00111.i 00 085-0007% -202.21 -n5 Life Insucanca-P.D. 000:1.069 CINDA SARIN 0035420 9/24/1993 STMT. 0000472 EYE CARE: OF AMERICA STMT. 0035421 9/17/1993 0000907 MASS, GENERAL LIFE. INS. C STMT. 0035922 9/17/1993 600 9/17/1993 001140 00 08'7,-0000-2.02.74-45 0000495 S.J. FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC. EEO. EitTo,fiqhter Assoc. Dueiii 0035423 9/17/1993,N 700 9/17/1993 001119 00 00,1; 001.0-202.21-13 0000820 PUBLIC EMP. ASSOC. STHT. Eerc Dues 0035424 9/24/1993 aoo a/17/1993 ooilso 00 005-0000-202.21-41 0000869 RIVERSIDE CD. EMPLOYEES STMT. Laedit Union Deductions 0035125 9/2A/1993 700 9/16/4993 0011,21. Gni led kJ Co (I t 1000 9/17/1993 001152 00 085 -0000 -202.219 Defecreil Compensation Deductions 1100 9/11/13E33 021153 00 08-0000-802,61 Vetei fed Compensation 1200 9/1.7/1993 ooll 04 00 005-0000-202-21-12 F.D. Dueia 1300 9/20/1993 001155 00 210-1100-111.21-10 RepLenish Petty Lash 1400 9/20/1993 001156 00 010-2500-425.21-30 Replenish Celli Cash 1500 9/20/1993 001157 00 010-3200-471.31-20 Replenish Petty Cn6D 0000777 UNITED WAY DC HEMET PEP. 0035426 9/21/1023 II 0000607 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 51111. 0035127 9/24/1993 0000691 lINCOLN NATIONOL. 0035120 9/21/A993 STMT. 0000912 S.J. POLICE ASSOCIATION RED, 0035429 9/24/1993 II 0001034 S.J. TREASUREFHS PETTY CA REn. 0035130 9/21/1993 NI 0001034 S.J. TREASURER'S ['CITY CIA REU. 0035430 9/24/1993 0001034 S..L TREASURER'S PETTY CA PER. 0035430 9/24/1993 PAGE 9 670.00 09,202,74 160,00 112.67 721.00 100.00 119.00 4.021.73 Tor.no 923.1O 710.00 1.90 7.26 72.47 1102PARLD 9/30/93, n:o,,,tlo PROGRAM GM3130 City of San Jacloto ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPBATE LIST nRoup NUMBER 1 00053 Phepoid A/F 9-30-93 ACCOUNTING PEPIOD/YEAFU 03/19'24 GROUP USER ANNE 7RAN34 TEAMS COTE 001ACHEN Ilk ACCOUNT NOMBEN PRAT P.O. VENOM toPwink NAME fNVOICE mumripP DUE BATE cHrpm., CHECK DOTE TYPE LAST TRANS 113:11 1 DLSCPfPffON 2 1600 9920/1293 00.1U10 00 011-1150-410.21-214 Pechmish P0119 Cash 1200 9/20/1993 001159 00 050-29000 -420.31 -20 keplieo0.i.h Petty Cosh 1000 9/20/1993 0011 AO 00 01/1T-170,21-4 I 7.21-20 1900 9/20/1993 001161 00 010-7300-2431.21-10 2000 9/20/1293 00112,2 00 025-7100-410.21-00 CeoLenish Petty IA:. 2100 9/-20/1993 001163 00 010-7400-425.33-40 i-,:4:-;PLeni,.Th Petty Cash 2200 2/20/1993 001164 00 09A-9700-470.30-90 RepHoo17:h Petts Cash 2300 9/20/1993 001165 00 096-9700 -470.31 -20 RewLenish Petty Cash 2400 9/17/1293 0011AA 00 050-9000-31110.21 -10 Water 32111 Pia1111-10 21500 9/20/1993 001167 00 010-0000 310.07''T95 Refund Reifose 7, Dowp Fees 2600 9/20/1093 001160 00 010-11: 00-431.21-90 Laoch-Hoizaldoos Ma1esial. Incideot-Esp1aoade 2700 Y/22/1995 001.169 00 026-9700-470.31-20 114.ectrisal. Sesvices 93 TEFE• Showcase DispLos 0001034 S.J. TREASURER'S PETTY CA RUN. 0035430 9/2A/1.093 0001034 S.J. TREASURER'S PETTY CA ROIl N 0035430 9/24/1993 0001034 S.J. TREASURER'S PETTY CA Prn. 0035430 9/24/1993 0001.031 TWASI.A1411R'5 PETTY CA REN. 0035130 9/24/1993 N 0001031 S.J. TREASURER'S PETTY CA 14211. 0035430 2/24/1993 0001034 S.J. TREASURER'S PETTY CA pro. 0035430 9/24/1993 0001034 S.J. TREASURER'S PETTY Pn M2O. 0035430 9/24/1993 0001034 S.J. TREASURER'S PETTY CA REfl. 0035430 9/24/1993 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER 003.111431 9/74/1993 0001072 MARIA REYNOSO 0075132 9/24/1993 0001071 JACK IN -THE -PDX 0035433 9/24/1993 REGN 0001077 GREYHOUND EXPOSITION !',rot) pro. 0035434 2/24/1993 2800 9122/199 001170 00 010-7500-425.34 OR 0000.296 DIVINE REAL VSTATES PED, Lease Paywent-A000s1 .1:1.2 E, 0035135 9/24/1993 2900 9/22/1993 001171 00 010-1200-412.21-70 0000226 CHEVRON. U.5.3,. STMT. Gas -City Vehis1es 0035436 9/24/1993 3000 9/22/J993 001172 00 065 -0050 -425.20 -00 Cobsa hiAolhance Marqaret Cameron 0000969 AETNA HEALTH FLAW; OF STMT. 003.7437 9/24/1993N PAGE 10 AMOUN1 R0,00 311.76 170.00 62-2TO 150.23 C2,50 1.117.40 11.94 173.14 REPAkEk w06:4o PROGRAM GM7130 City: of San Jae:Into PAGE. II ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UFTWOLI LIST GROUP NUMBIR I 0003,..3 Ftepaid A/F 9270393 ACCOUNTING PFRIOD/YEAR1 07/1991 oRour IISER ANNL ------- ........ --------, TRANS4 ff,ANG DALE VOUCT11213 I'! ACCOUNT NUMBER PCGT P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE: NI MPER DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECKCHECK DA1E TYPE LAST TRANS 5:1(70 9/2199:3 03)1 I f'..3 00 110511 41 yip 3200 9/22/1992 001171 00 00ti 0000-202.21 -79 kleaLth 3300 9/22/1997 001175 00 09.11-013.1-702.0.1. -79 Hea1111 Insurance 3400 9/27/1997 001720 OA 005-0000 9E02.21 -20 PERS CowIrihutione 3500 9/23/1993 001729 pE1'49 CuntLiblitionu 7600 9,511,17/15193 001770 00 091-P700-470.21-10 SupeLi0s -JEEP Showcase 3700 9/21'1993 001371 00 0959-9700-470.30 -90 DisPlay Coy MEP Showcase 3000 9/20/1993 001322 00 02G-7260-410.30-00 Graffiti Conf, Speaker Pnfticipation -Jan Leahy 3900 5/2994SY3 001353 00 096 -9700 -470.30-90 1TEP Con.dinalion Redevelopment 4000 0/29/1993 001351 00 096-9700-470.71-10 RepLenisk Poe*a.iie Meter 4100 U3029/1992 0012315 00 0:1219-1700-417.21-40 Fusta.ile Meter 4200 9/29/4993 001356 00 010-2500-425.21-10 RepLenish Postaiiie Neter 4300 9,929/A997 001357 00 OR1-4220-412.21-40 RepLenish Postnee Metet 0000969 AETNA MTDO TH 8TANS OF STMT. 0035137 9/24/1993 0000149 HEALTH NE'[ STMT. 0075138 9/24/1997 0000989 BIOS CO'.',)) OF CA, SIMT. 0035439 9/24/1093 Ii 0000030 PERS PLO. 003.5410 9/215/1993 0000030 PERS Pru. 0035441 9/27/4993 0000528 TAMRA GERARD EEL). 0035442 9/27/4993 0001007 SKYLINE REGI. 0075443 9/27/1997 II 0001089 THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S 0075444 9/30/199 0000529 TAMRA GERARD 7732 00754415 9/29/19Y3 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER RECI. 003)3416 9/30/1993 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER prn. 00335416 9/29/1997 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER REQ. 0035446 9/29/1993 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER 0035446 9/29/1993 1400 9/29/1997 001350 00 010 7100.431.21-10 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER RepLenish Postaee Meter 4500 9/29/1993 001359 00 010-32002471.21-10 Replenish Rostane Meter 0035446 9/29/1993 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER 0035446 9/29/21.1193 EEO. RUN. rqmniltql 'REPARED 9/30/93, 0:06140 PROGRAM OM31:311 City of San Jacinto ACCOUNTS RAYAPLE UPDATE LIST uRour HUHDER : 00053 Etepaid 6sE 9-30-93 ACCOUNTING PEEIOD/YEAR: 03/1994 oRour USER ANNE IkANIS DAIE 14111EITER t1E ACCOINT NIAMDER DETIICFUETION 1 CESCRIFTIC44 2 4600 9/29/199T 001360 00 Si6 6.3300-431.91 -10 kmeLenish Post:Tge Meter 4700 9/29/1993 00E361 00 010-4150-410.2M-10 ReeLeoiyh Postage Hetet' 4000 9/29/199/ 001362 00 010 2100•425.21-40 Rep1enish Postage Aotmy 4900 9/29/1993 00136I3 00 050690006450.21 -10 ReeLenish Postage Meter. C11111,11: 0110:1141: OTIOUP TOTALS 49 164,361.30 PROT P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NI NDER ME DATE CHECKCHUCK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 0000369 U.S. POSTMAOTEp 0035446 9/79/1993 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER 0035116 9/29/1993 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER 0035446 9/29/1997 0000369 U.S. POSTMASTER 0035446 9/29/1993 REDN N CACI 12 AANONI 071 I . T13 REPAREU 9/30/93, 8:06:40 City of San Jacinto PAPE 13 PROGRAM O1131311 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST GROUP NUMBER I 0004 A/Ic -70 -93 Batch T2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD/YEAR: 07/1994 GROUP USER ANNE TRAMS0 MANS DATE VOUCHER DK ACCOUNT MUMPER PROT F.O. NENDOR VENDOR NAME DESTRICIION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT DWI BATE CHECK0 CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 100 9/08/1993 001176 00 02.5-7100-410.21-90 0000931. AL'S KUBOTA TRAC1011 LAWNM 6002 ';' i730./ I 997 0000000 200 8/25/1997 0011/7 00 050-9000-4.21-90 0000924 OLL. PURE CHEMICAL 0671 01 Lor Inc Cyindefc.01,1-tof 9/30/1993 0000000 300 8/25/1997 001170 00 050 -900C950..fl -90 0000924 011.. PURE CIAIITHICN. 3493 ChLorino Cylinder-Wator 9/30/1993 0000000 400 0/25/1993 001179 00 03O-9000.450.21-90 ChLovine CyLinders-Wator 500 OT271/1993 001100 00 050-9000-450.21-90 in,. t3,.Hinders -Watfif 600 8/25/1993 001101 00 050-9000-480.21-90 0000924 ALL PURE CHEMTEAL 3664 9/30/1997 0000000 0000924 ALL PURE CHEMICAL 9/30/1993 0000000 0000924 ALE PURE EHEMICAL Chtorine C9Lindefs-Watec 9/30/1993 0000000 N ny9e N 9206 N 700 (4/203/1993 o()1182 oo 050-9000-450.21-90 0000924 ALL ruRr CHEMICAL 7014 ShLovino Cc[inc.K.H04.1a101 9/30/1997 0000000 1(00 0/25/J993 001107 00 050-7000-450.21-90 0000924 ALL PURE CHEMICAL -,31(99 Chlovinc Cy[indcfc Wafer 9/30/1993 0000000 900 9.,20/1993 01)1l04 oo 053-9000-450.,10-90 0000949 E.S. BABCOCK 3, SONS 40356 84c I cv la I. AI.vn ic tialor 9/30/1993 0000000 1..500,00 1,200.00- 2,159.70 1..500.00 - 1,Y!..)0g00 1000 9/20/1903 001185 00 050-9000-450.70-90 0000949 E.5 . BABCOCK 401.510 740,00 i AI. i(Ti-:-,,9/30/1993 0000000 1100 9/20/1993 001106 0000949 E.G. BABCOCK 7, SONS 95141 ETi00 Bac.10, ial Ana 1)- rA1-.) +.1,1 t er" 9/.,30/19973 0000000 II 1200 9/20/1993 00l1.1(7 00 050-9000-480.70-90 0000949 E.S. BABCOCK 6 SKINS .972230 Baclucial 9/30/1993 0000000 1700 9/20/1993 001100 CO 080-9000-480.70-90 0000949 E.S. BABCOCK 6 (IONS 40680 30,00 HacteiiaL Analyicct.later 9/30/1993 0000000 1400 9/20/1993 001189 00 050-9000-450.30-90 0000949 7.S. BABCOCK 1, SONS 95442 22.00 Bactefial 0n1:i1yi-Watec 9/30/1993 0000000 1500 9/20/1993 001190 00 050-9000-450.30-90 0000949 E.S. DADCOCK 8. !N.111S 411045 30,00 BacteciaL AnaLysPii-Wat0f 9/30/1997 0000000 P13,TPtiiiRIRD 9/30/93. 0:06110 City of San Jacinto PROGRAM 13h31311 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST DROUP HUMBER : 00054 0/P 9-30-93 Batch 42 ACCOUNT:IND PERIOD/YEAR: 03/1994 GROUP USER ANNE: ----------------- fRANS• TRANS BAIT VOUCHER DK ACCO5NT HUMBER PROT P.O. VEDOR VENDOR NAME DESCR I F41141N 1 DE:aii RE: .E111:00 2 1600 9/20/1993 001191 00 050-9000-450.70-90 Bacletial. ElooliviTiv-Watev 1700 0/20/1993 001192 00 019-4120-450.21-72 Tow Unit t110-F51..5 (Look 1000 0120/1993 001193 00 019-3200-431.21-72 (ow Unit l',.!()-r-ciro ryucc 1900 9/03/1973 001194 00 010-3100-431.34-05 Radio Maintenance-P,11. 2000 9/03/1997 001195 00 010-3200-431.31-05 Radio Maiotenance-P,O. ()() / (>3/199:3 001 96 00 01.0.--41.00-410.3.1--()13 I adio Hai 111 E Tit:: E.:- 2200 9/03/1993 001197 00 010 -3300 -171.31 -05 Radi () .1 10 (.??11(::e--1'' ncri 2300 9/03/1993 001190 00 050 -9000-450.34 -05 Radio Hainienance-Watep 2400 9/01/1993 001199 00 020-2200-419.30-91 I ego I Seyv i cep -Anti (1.31 93 i ), A I 01' 2500 9/01/1993 001200 00 039 -4150 -410.30 -91 Legal. Service'a -Auguat 93 City A1torney 2600 9.101 �1993 00:11:70:1. 00 096 9700-470.30-90 (3. ci v ( 9 City Aitiofveiv- 2700 9/01/1993 001202 00 010-1111-411.30-21 Le9a1 Setvicet. -August 93 City Altornev 2000 9/21/1797 001.203 00 025-7253-410,35-10 Water Service.:, Loco Drive 2900 9/21/1993 001201. 00 025-7253-410.35-10 Wa 1 et Set v i cc-.- Ramona Empfei5swav INVOICE NUMBER ClE DATE CHECK31 CHUCK DATE: TYPE FAST TRANS 0000949 E.S. DADCACE SONS 95594 9/30/1.993 0000000 0000210 CASTELLANO'S TOWING SERV. .I.5044 9/30/1993 0000000 0000218 CASTEITAMO'S TOWTNO scRo. 14254 9/30/1993 0000000 0000230 COM SEC CD. 1-1A9930111 9/30/1993 0000000 0000230 COM GEC rn. MA993036 9/30/4993 0000000 0000230 COM GE):: CO. MA993005 9/30/1993 0000000 000023a COM SFR rn. MA993005 9/30/4993 0000000 0000230 COM SEC CO. MA993043 9/30/1993 0000000 0000251 COX CCIX STMT. 9/30/1993 0000000 00002:51 cox & rox situ, 9/30/1993 0000000 0000251 COX 4. COX STM1. 11/30/1993 0000000 0000231 cox & CCIX STMT. 9/30/1993 0000000 0000460 EASTERN MUNT.NATER DTST. STMT. 9/30/1993 0000000 0000460 EASTERN WW1...WATER DIST. STMT. 9/30/1993 0000000 3000 9/21/1993 001205 00 025-7257-410.35-10 0000460 EASTERN MUNT.WATER DIST. STMT. 6frint1111" 22.00 50.00 225,00 137.05 106.10 13.05 13.05 12.00 130.00 L0.00 7eo.00 342.50 R92.75 Water Servic0y 01acie7 9/30/1993 0000000 REPARLD 9630/93. 8:06:48 N'AJORAN GM7130 DKOUP MINDER « 00054 A612 9-30693 FUTIch ACCOUNTING PERIOD/IEAR: 03/1994 GROUP USER ANNE City of San Jacinto PAGE 15 o:c:cu PAYABLE UPDATE LIST TRA(FT HANS DAIE FEr: BK AEGGHNT NHOPEP N2111 P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME: INVOICE NUMBER' DESREITIION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 DUE fleirE CHECK4 CHECK DALE TYPE LAST TRANS 3100 9/21/1991 001206 00 025-7256 -410.35 -40 0000460 EASTERN NINI.WATER DIST, STMT. 144 It :, n in: Mounfaiv 9/30/1993 0000000 3200 9/21/1993 00120/ 00 025-72556410.75-40 Watch- Sec v o Vey () 3300 9 211 I 293 !,.,0 I 20!! OK) !4:2 "7 2E, 4 1 0 WO (-,1" i Donn.,1 14,1Y 3400 9621/1997 001209 00 023-7260-410.35-10 Water. Seyvicec EspIancIde 19c.ck 5ite 3500 9/27/1993 001210 00 010: 1700 -417.76 -50 ‘./ 3600 9/27/1993 001211 00 010-2500 -425.36650 Phone Seyvices 3700 9/27/1993 001212 00 010 2180 -471.76-50 Phone Seyvices 3000 9/27/1793 001213 00 01'2-3700-471.36650 o ne v 390 9272194 00124 00 010-6100-425.36 -50 Phone Suyvices 400(1 9/27/1993 001215 00 010-0400- 425.36 -50 Phone Seyvices 4:LOO 7/27/1993 001216 00 0C-2?0002450,38 -50 Se,Aices 4200 0/27/1993 00121.' 00 010-I.7002417.36-221; Le4aL Adveylisivig 4300 0/12121993 0012113 00 010 61110 -411,36 -25 Adverfisinc 4400 0727/1993 0011219 00 010-11106411.36-25 Leqat AdveYtisimi 4)30)) 0/27/1993 001220 00 00.9-17006417.36-25 tV): I. Ad ye! I i I no! AMOUNI 0000460 EASTERN MUNT.WATEP DIST. STMI, 510.13 9/70/1997 0000000 0000460 EASTERN MUNIUJATER DIST. STMT. J59.87 9/30/1997 0000000 0000460 EASTERN MUNT.WATER DIST. STMT. 9/30/1993 0000000 0000526 GENERA!! TO) Er:GONE CO. SINT, 80.17 9/30/1993 0000000 Cl 0000526 GENERAL fl3 ENIONE CO. STMT. 46.44 9/30/1993 0000000 0000526 GENERAL IEIEPHONE CO. SIMI, 180.14 9/30/1993 0000000 0000526 GENERA! IFIEPOONE CO. 5TMT. 0) 9/30/1993 0000000 0000526 GENERAL TELEFEONS SO. SIMI, 9/30/1993 0000000 0000526 GENERAL, mEr-1-1()NE co. 30. 9/30/1993 0000000 0000526 GEAFRAI TIM ERN -NA': CO. STMT. 112,83 9/3A/1993 0000000 0000566 HEMET NEWS STMT. 9/30/1993 0000000 0000566 HEMET NEWS SIMI. 54.90 9/30/1993 0000000 H 0000566 HEMET 01205 STMT. 9/30/1997 0000000 0000566 HEMET NEWS STMT. 9/70/1997 0000000 REPARED 9/30/93. 0106140 City ,'I' San Jacinto PACE 16 PROGRAM GM3131! ACCOUNTS PAYADLE UPDATE LIST GROUP WUNDER : 00054 A/fl 9-30-93 Batch ACCOUNTING PERICIA/YEAR: 03/1994 GROUP USER ANNE TRANS* TRANS PAillE VOUCHER DE ACCOUNT MODER ERNI R.04 VENDOR VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION INQUICE WUNDER DUE DATE CHECK' CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS rtilL11 III 4600 9/07/1993 001221 00 021-A150/410.21-55 0000612 INDUSTRIAL. AS(TRAIT 530106 171.911 CoLd F.W. 9/30/1993 0000000 4700 9/7/1993 001222 00 021-4150-410421-55 Cold Mix-E4W4 law) 9.,(7/1_99'3 01...122.1 00 021--4150-410.21 -55 Cold Mix-P414. 4900 0/23/A993 001224 00 051-7000-450,10-01 Doxes-Wate!• Dept. 5000 9/15/1993 001225 00 1200-412,35-17 CulluLar Seivicuis 5100 9/15/1993 001 226 00 010-3100-431435-16 CelAuLar Services 5200 9/4111993 001227 (IC 010-4100-410.35-16 CeLIT(Lar 5300 9/15/1993 001220 00 010-320(6 -4131435 -16 Cie I U. La r Serv it sis 5100 9/15/1993 001229 00 010-1700-417435-16 Cu 1 ITA Loi • Se y 4.(14.:0E 5500 9/15/1993 001230 00 010-4150-410.35-16 Cellular Services 5600 9/15/1995 001231 00 050-9000-450.35-16 Ce 1. L V• I 5700 9/15/1993 001232 00 010-2500-425.35-16 CeLlulay 5000 9/22/1993 0012I7 00 096-9700-470430-95 Leo. AsEistanl 5900 0/31/1993 001234 00 025-7100-410434-05 ConAracl• Sei•vices Park Cleaning 6000 13/31/1993 001235 00 021-4150-410.34 05 Contract Park Cleaning 9/30/1993 0000000 N 0000612 INDUSTRIAL. ASLOALA 530223 12043S 0000612 INDUSTRITlA ASPHAlT 5302.40 167,75 9/30/1993 0000000 0000635 J & R CONCRETE PROD. INC.:. 19272 9/30/1993 0000000 0000674 LA CELEUIAR ill El -'HONE STMT, 17,31,149 9/30/1993 0000000 ()0()()674 LA CE.1...1.111. AR Trll. 9/30/ .1.593 0000000 0000674 LA CELLO! AR TELEPHONE SLUM 4'1,44 9/30/1993 0000000 NI 0000674 LA CELITWAR TEl EPIDNE STMT. 36.69 9/30/1993 0000000 0000674 LA CELLULAR M..FPOONE 9/30/1993 0000000 0000674 LA CELL iii.. OPT El FPI-IONE 9/30/21993 0000000 0000674 LA CE11 All AR 9/30/ I 993 0000000 0000674 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE 9/30/1993 0000000 0000670 GREG LANTZ 9/30/1993 0000000 STMT. CTMTNI GTMTN STMT. NI PRO. 00001106 PHOENIX PROGRAM INC. 7151 9/3(7/1993 00(70000 0000006 PHOENIX PRonRr)m INC. 7451, 9/30/1993 0000000 31,2(7 31, 0(3 46,9t3 17 .00 151311,370 375.00 UtiLitie5 7300 9/15/499 001240 00 025 -7100 -410,L35 -14 7400 9/15/1993 00124Y 00 020-.7250-410.35-14 Htitities AdveVlieeMent 6400 0723/1993 001239 00 010 4100-410.21-10 DIneprintinq-PIanninN 6500 0/23/1994 001210 00 010-7400,425.35-12 66()() / 5 41 93 04.1:1 24 I 0(../ II 700-4 I 7,75-1:1 6700 1P/AIJ.41774 001242 00 01P-21'400-425.75..44 3,3(02 Li/ ()CI:1.1114.11 :11:0 010-- .11.7(4---11 3.1.35- :I i4 of,) 1.99Z CB) :I 244 1.:):/ Pi:10 . 35-14 11.1. i I. it i 7000 9/15/193 001245 00 040-0000-431.5-14 UtiIiiies Wnied Abatement 6 12I0an REPAIRED 9/30/93. 0:06:40 PROGRAM 0031.311 City of. San J4cinto PACE .17 ACCOUNTS PAYADLE UPDATE LIST ['ANNIE NUMBER : 00054 0/E Y-LLO-9I3 11,, I, Ic 112 ACCOUNTING PERIO1:/1PR7R1 07/1974 ORONP USER ANM:5 ... IRANSE IRONS DATE 0011C.HUP PE ACCOUNT NIINDEP PEP I P.O. VENDOR VEt./DOR NAME immTTEE NUMBER DUE DATE CHECKCHECK DATIL TYPE LAST 1RANS DILSCRIPIION I DESCRIPTION 6100 9/23/1994 001236 0:4 01/4-33014-410B ,L30..L91 Weed AD4 co0n I 6 AMOUOT 0000006 PHOENIX PROGR0M IOC. 64I,'LOO 9/30/1993 0000000 6200 9/23/1993 001237 00 010-7700-431.70-91 00001106 PHOENIX PROGRAM INC. 7453 9/70/1993 0000000 6000 0/31/.100 00121, 00 01011T00-417.36-25 0000025 PRESEIBINWRARISE 1131 11 • Ptanni 11,11 (2064ili ,.,.,. el oneL 9/30/1993 0000000 N 0000063 RIVERSIDF BLUEPRINT 45505 5,21 9/30/1997 0000000 N 217,50 0000436 so, CALIFORNIA 00(1 CO, SIMI, 1,76 7/30/1993 0000000 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA F.Diom cn. STMT. 311.52 9/30/199.3 0000000 0000447 SO, CAL EDISON CO. SIMI, 030,60 9/30/1993 0000000 0000447 SO. CALJFORNTA EDISON CO. 007.62 9/.30/1993 0000000 0000447 00, CAIJFORNIA roisom co. SINT, 9/30/1993 0000000 0000447 SO. CIILIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT. 341,51. 9/30/1977 0000000 7100 7/15/1970 001216 OQ 010-6100-425,35-J4 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON no. STMT 9/0/i993 0000000 7200 92:13/I 090 001247 00 010-7425.35-44 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDIsow CO. STMT. 9/30/1997 0000000 0000447 SO. CW..TFTIRIITA IBIISON CO. SIMI . 9/30/1993 0000000 1-1 0000447 SO. CAl...IFORNIA EDISON co, 01mT. 9/30/1993 0000000 7500 9/15/19 001250 OQ 025-7254-410.35-14 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. STMT. HIiIilieR 9/30/4993 0000000 REPARED 9/30/93. 0:06:40 PRI/DRAM CM1131I City of San Jacinto ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST GROUP NUMBER • 000tM4 66F 9-70-93 DaLch 42 ACCOUNTING FERIOD/YEAR: 03/1994 GROUP USER ANNE TRANS4 AkANS BATT VOUCHER! Dk ACCOUNT NUMBER ppm.' P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NANE TN/JUICE NUMDER DESCRIPTION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 DOE DATE CHECK' CHE01. DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 7600 9415/1993 001251 00 025-7260-410.35-14 7700 9415/1993 001252 00 050-9000-450.15-14 UtitiLlem 7800 9.! HEA293 001253 00 02E —1150 6110.35 -14 UkititieT 7900 9/14/1993 001254 00 025-7260-410.35-14 Ulitifies 0000 9621/1991 001255 00 025-7260-410.10-80 C2affiii Removal. OaLionm SIkeetio 8100 9/21/1993 001256 00 025-7260-410.30-80 UTaffiti Removat Varionm Skyeets 8300 9/21/1993 001258 00 025 7260 110.30-80 Gkoffiti Removal Varionm St:leeks 8400 9/02/1993 001259 00 010 S100-431.14-10 Cop ,',?,' Lmaiott A8veemnot Potime DeravImeivt asoo 9/02/1993 001260 00 010-3300-131.33-30 Lopiei 10w2c Agieemeol Dri.!trImenk 0600 9/02/1.993 001261 00 010-1700 117.33-70 Copier leame Agreement Etorini119 Demamtment eROUR TOTALS COUNT: 85 AMOUNT/ 4'3,499.31 9/3041991 0000000 0000447 SO. 0ALIF1'tRNT8.FUISON CO. STMT. 9430/1993 0000000 71 (T.10111F 430.9 0000447 SO. CALIFORNTA"EDISON CO. STMT. 15.304.36 71 0000417 SO, CALIFORNIA EDTSON 810T. 695017 9430/1993 0000000 0000447 SO, CALIFORNIA EDTSON nr.) STMT. 5.213,03 9/3041993 0000000 71 0000:384 VALLEY TEEN LOONDATION 87 200,00 9/30/1993 0000000 0000354 VALLEY TEEN FOUNDATION 120 1,116.00 9/30/1993 0000000 0000351 VALLEY TEEN cOUNDATTON 9/30/1993 0000000 71 0000307 XEROX CORPORATT0N 760597)039 107.67 9/30/1993 0000000 1/ 0000707 XEROX CORPORATION 560561279 261,38 9/30/1991 0000000 0000307 XEROX CORPORATION 560561279 261.39 9/30/1993 0000000 71 9/30/93., 0:06140 City of San Jacinto PAGE 19 PROURAM Si131311 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST OBOUP NUMBER : 00055 ra/B 9-30-93 0a1ch E3 ACCOUNTING HIRIOD/YEAP: 03/199d DROOP USER ANNE 1'RAN7;4 IRANS 1.1031. VOUCHER DE: ACCOUNT NUMBER 1161.1 P.0, VENDOR VENDOR NAME: DEEIDNILI ADO 1 DESPPIPTION 2 DUE DATE EHECKt CHECK DAIE TYPE :AST TRANS 100 9/04/1993 001262 00 010-.3300-431.34-05 0007051 ALFORD & PUYFAR Memo ,& kcmovo Eouodttian 317 III EL) i 7/30/1993 0000000 INVOICE NUMBER ANAHNT SIMT. 20(7 9/11/1993 001263 00 010-3160-4.31,39-16 0000977 ALL City Padiom. Inc. STMT. 93,50 Posevii.-F.U. 9/30/1993 0000000 N ii00 I,iiII1.99:3: 001261 00 01061331:1-412.30-90 0000153 JOSEPH 0, DEIMNAP STMT. 300.00 PoPpdvdph Ex0mis3tion Fia.i3-3..ita PaIii...e OTTitca 9/30/1993 0000000 N 400 9/01/1993 001265 00 010631071.T1.11-10 0000199 EMPLOYMENT BEV, DEPT. STMT. BEI1',00 Uttemptovment Beviefi1 9/30/1993 0000000 It 500 9/14/1993 001266 00 019I-3100-431,33610 0000227 CHEVREIN STMT. .31,a5 Cii'Y Vehic[o 1111aiii 9/30/1993 0000000 N 600 9/14/J993 001267 00 01 '?-1200-412.33650 0000227 CHEVRON STMT. 31,95 City Vehicle Washea 9/30/1993 0000000 000 M/31/1993 00126Y 00 050-165.50-4130.30-90 0001052 CREDIT MANAGEMENT SERVICE STMT. EI-clier Dollt3stiooa 9/30/1993 0000000 It 900 9/11/1993 00 025 7250.410,30-90 0000263 D & J LANDSCAPE & MATATEN 9'996 230,40 .1.dy I. I. til I i. d i...il I“:1 W iip r, Eippay Fop iteedE:. 9/110/1993 0000000 N 1000 i1"/11/1993 00125/1 00 025 -75'513 -410.30 69A SohabaI, iirpilscape Bp, ay Fop 1100 9/14/1993 001262 00 025 -72566410,30 Rancho Ejood Cootvol. OophttiT Control. 1200 9/24/4993 001275 00 010 63100 6431.10 -01 Ettrip <,7,1" /1, tti tit f t tt1: Offit:er 1400 9/07/1993 0012613 00 021 -4150 -410.30 695 EatI. ic Win -Da Admin. Audital 199'3 1500 0.-"O//1993 0012iSi. 00 010 aiI.500 -4:t3.30 -Y5 PubLic Misks Admit). Audal 1993 1600 9/06/1993 00176 00 055-4170 -450.30 -9h Public WoiL0 Admin. 00 cot 1993 LADO 9/01.71993 001270 00 03,0-9000-450.30695 Puhtip Admin, Ao0ost 1993 0000263 D & J LANDSCAPE: & MAINATEN 9996 9/30/1993 0000000 0000263 D & J LANDSCAPE & MAI-ATE:0 99973 7,429,00 9/30/1993 0000000 00002.76 PAUL. DEIBADD EEO. 600,00 9/30/1973 0000000 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES STMT• 1..611..00 9/30/1993 0000000 N 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCJATES STMT. 9/10./1.993 0000000 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES STMT. 200.00 9/30/1993 0000000 0000477 EVANS & ASSOISTAlES SINT. 910,00 9/110/1993 0000000 REPARED 9/30/93. 0:06:10 City of San Jacinto rAoR PROORAM 0M3130 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LIST GROUP NUMBER 000s fvp 9-30-93 Batch 07 ACCOUNTING I)Il/1 03/1994 GROUP USER ANNE --------• TRANS0 FRANS 901E VOUCHER BF ACCAUNT NOODER PEOf P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DESCRIPTION I. DESCRIPTION 2 DUE DATE CHECKt CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 1900 9/07/1997 001279 00 036-3100-471.30 -S5 Public llovkb 0dmin. Audnst 1997 1900 9/07/1977 001200 00 025-7100-410.30-95 Public Works Admin. Auquidf 1997 2000 9/07/1993 00l2F700 025 7256.410,30-25 Public W01-1.r. Mdmin, Audust 1993 2100 9/07/1793 001202 00 096-77700-160.3099'7 Public Wofks Admin, Auqust 1997 2200 9/07/1793 001203 00 025-7257 110.30 -72 Public Woilis Odmin, Atibust 1797 2301) 9/07/1993 001294 00 065-0050 4i75.29-06 Public Works Admin. Auqusl 1977 2400 9/15/1.97/7 001291 00 010-4150-110.34-70 Street 9006c1oi Lease 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCUATES STMT. Efil0,00 7/70/1997 0000000 0000477 EVANS ? ASSOCIATES STMT. 350.00 9/30/1977 0000000 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIAlES STMT. /000 Y/-30/199.3 0000000 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCTAIEC SAlf. 560.00 7/30/1993 0000000 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES SAIT. 210.00 9/70/1993 0000000 0000477 EVANS & ASSOCIATES STMT. 70 00 9/70/1993 0000000 N 0000505 FIRST MUNICIPAL oIvIoioN STMT. 9/30/1993 0000000 2000 9/20/1797 001296 00 06S7A050-425.29-00 0000526 GENE TEl CO. STMT, Plion0 S0ivicus 7/0/1797 0000000 N 2600 9/10/1993 001297 00 07-,5-4170 400.70-90 0000639 JINNI 9703E0S. INC- 1718 Maintenance Sewer Lift 9/70/N997 0000000 Ni 7700 0/23/1993 001289 00 029-9661-440.34-05 0001079 LA VISTA oLcomi 7 DRUG 03-MT. 7,021,00 La Visto•CDOG Grant 9/30/1993 0000000 N 2000 9/27/19'77 0012139 00 010-1110 •-111.74-05 0000606 PAMELA LEE STMT. 177,13 Staff Assislo,,c.i. Deputy City Clcsli 9/30/1977 0000000 2900 9/16/1979 001270 00 010-1111-411.70-14 0000607 3.1E3-lMO.CASS1:DY/F4IE315ON STMT. 0.012.50 I. Sevvices Tabis- RiElations/Ausuct V3 9/70/179.3 0000000 N 3000 9/40/1993 001291 00 010-2500-4211.35-16 0001090 MCI TIE) MOMMUNICATIONS STM.. 112,00 Phone So.vices Lond L.1154: 9/30/1997 0000000 N 3100 9/10/1977 001292 00 010-1700-417.75-46 0001090 MCI TELECOMMUNICATIONS STMT. 7,1(4 Rhone Sevvicias Land 3-listan6e 9/70/1997 0000000 3200 9/10/1993 00127'7 00 01C, -3300 -41.35 -16 0001090 MCI ITI ECOMMUNIGATIONS STMT. 7.04 Ph 0 fle C`I i C Lond Distauce 7/30/1993 0000000 FEAI7I1'I 0z:'/93 Il1()i1 1i Ci'L)' of F3o ,.3c rro:Ir)l::oM 1:31.3lJ 00:IHIN]F; :A6r) E LJP!:I6Tr r..i.oi (111:11.11' I.Jii)I::,I: (:3)>3 l5,'F -•••'(()•--ti3 •- --1s - :I:L1L1l'r:<F1F: lJ<:l::x>_I:1> rI <03 -":l? ('.>I:()l1l:: LJl::.I r4-::; If Ii: ii: )>('1:r'I.H-Ir Lillli}1I 3') ))j))'flp vE:NI:I0l: MONO II or::: Clid 1. rI.;i.o:31: 11110 2 Lt.JU. 'M[. cHE:L<K 00012< fOrE 't'YFI:: LAST TRANS; rl:I::l:: I-Il 1ii I:::: i3k I' 3300 9/1 0.- I '-'0 14 u.) <7:!J,0O4 0 ';--1 4 (>00:1.000 MET TIEI.,.Ec:I'lllMI II4iE4LTI'lNG 03 (Thoor: er I,..00r UI lo .r/.-2>./:I993 0000000 N :400 9/il or-9;3 00-I. 295 00 0:10-3200 ---33 -I • 35---! 5 0001.000 MI: I TEL .03' OHM! III I OAT :r ONO ST ML • :1 (39 Lino Ui,rL0 v'i' 9/30/:.993 0000000 N 0000 0/903 <ii 9) 5.Lo--3:!.-53) -420. :o:--- IS 000:1.000 MC:]: 'r:I...nI::rIMHHNLOOT:FMNS SIN) 1.0 Tr I l-:-i 9.--- 30/:L 993 0000000 N 3603) 9/:13/:I.993 •1.-297 00 (130 3.0-43:1. .40-40 0001.054 MOT000LO OOEDTT 000F'0O4'T'T 2e04:I 15:I 35 30 I0 - MrI i,o I- r::qo 1,911 l.-,/1,:Fe 9/':o/:1993 0000000 N 37017 9.- :I.3 :119.'- 00:1378 00 055 •-3:i.0O .102. 40 -40 0001 Qt34 MuFOl?0I. r:REr:l:l Cr (('4fF 2004.1401 Ui<_..lb j---h llu f,..(<) <-s :..11.ql)?_•ijt I ff <€/101) rIi,s".< 9/707.99:3 0000000 N :3001) 7/ I0/:I99 3 r) i 29" 00 053 -3:1)1)401. .40-40 000:1.004 MOToI-21;1I...o CFrErIT I L>F-flCOTT 2004:195:1. l-'<h Cu T;,u II-,:-> E1iilrnt I.../-/FUl0'110'f9 4/i.993 0000000 .1900 '-< :</13",'3 00:1500 00 05-3-- 0I .34 40 oco .054 MOT080I 0 r:r:ErI'f C0I('U'Ol)AT'I' '004 1902 F0lrIio Cl,llu,ruT,ic.,fl ion Fth:',rr,'I L,-erpe'°,rj, 97.30/1993 0000000 N 400(1 0/14/31790 "8:1,30:1. 00 010 4::3>----47<3 ' :3/0 0000700 0V0RN3[CjI [:LNDI.I8Tl1'I:OI... 2062 14 .00 Janitor I. .1i-- t.::,,,,i -I- U-'4-10- 9/30/31.990 0000000 N 4100 .199 .3 ''00002 03) ('90 - 7<S .41 0 3.3 21 0000700 O0I?.PN[I3i IT IM1,I '0 1:3:1 (rI,, 2210 'II poll). 0 010(1-0 713'O/:I.990 (>000000 N -1200 9/17/1993 0013<53 00 K):). <-:1,21.0 -.1 2, 30-90 • 0000930 PAC I r:r.c i--is :1: 7000 :1. 0935 241--; 00 I. of 901 Fl< I or-, l< I• 0-or <31:0-' ,-ro ijl 1 rio, 9/32/:I.993 (7000000 N 430<) 9..':). 3/3.992 <t 0-1:304 00 010-2.2:10 --4.I.2,30----93> 0000730 poc:i:i- :[r: FI-IY8:I:C ((<NO 1 271 070.00 L ovmr,nI F'hor:I,'r, Fr-. 11;. :or Illf ---<-- '/30,1.25<3 000000X0 II 4400 9/1. 7/31.993 00:1300; 04) 01/s -:I.2:I.0--4:I.2, 3<>-- 90 0000930 oor.i:r:i:c: r-l--l81c: I ONS I. ]':l.7OLI 2-10- 00 I. oyme 3 II-<vrr I or,, No -Moo 3'€,:l---Ml,,0-1 9/:30/:l 99:3 0000000 I4 -4500 r'/03/7993 1)351305, 00 0:r0----°000 ---400-40-0:! 0000.792 F'Ar.:3I0l... H l::I1:I:Lo:lN oy:-'r EMS 1-' 0013163:31. 'fr' 1.9101< (I 0l- 1- r" Olo Ma 1 I 11.10 lit Mr -I')-, to W 'Ic-s Tr, 1 9 .30/I 99:3 00000()0 4500 0/4,3 :I99:3 001 3o 7 00 052 --1170-400.4(7-01. 0000792 f-AOlEL M::-R): RAIN SYNTEMS 13800533:1 .1 47 2? No ice Mo I. Pub I. ir: Wo)'l-or to W,o-I'cro' tl,'-orL 9/30/.I 990 0000000 N -4700 9/:I.1/:I.4r93 001:'oI'T <9) 0--:3500---431 :3-4-05 0000795 FAGENIOl OTMTS :1 3165 -1 1-'acler s..Fire ilEflO I ("'30/ :1 993 0000000 N 'RE:PARED 9/30/93: 8106:40 PROGRAM 3M3130 City of San Jacinto PAGE 22 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE UPDATE LJST GROUP NUMBER : 000517 AfE -70 -93 Datch :1: ACCOUNTING PERIOD/YEAR: 03/1994 oPour USER ANNE TRANSt TRANS DATE VOUCHER DK ACCOUNT NUMBER PPOT P.O. VFNDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMBER DESCPIPlION 1 DESCRIPTION 2 4000 9/22/1297 001309 00 029 -8661 -440.74-05 S3:111C1 Grant 4900 9/17/1997 001710 00 010-J700-417130-90 Clanninq Commission 5000 9/17/1293 001711 00 01C-9700-417,70-90 CLannins Cowolission DILL DATE CHECK0 CHECK DATE TYPE LAST TRANS 0000006 PHOENIX PPM:Wall INC. STMT. 9/30/1993 0000000 0000989 CHRIS CAFH...00N-DOYDOS 9/30/1993 0000000 0000939 DAVID OFF.:: PLANK 9/30/1993 0000000 PEON 1111111N 3100 9/20/1997 001712 00 010-2500-425,3F941 0000147 SO. CALIFORNIA Fr SON CO. MAL Ufflities 9/30/1993 0000000 5200 9/20/1997 001313 00 010-4150-410.35-14 0000447 00. CALIFORNIA unTE0I119 CO. 0E0. UTiLitios 9/30/1993 0000000 5300 9/20/1993 0011314 00 019-4550-410.35-11 0000447 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 001:1. UtiLitios 9/30/1993 0000000 17411)0 9/20./1.1141111 (V71.71111 4011111-4.1.117991170.1371-111 1.11.11.1 ties 3500 9/2031993 001336 00 095-72173-110.35-14 111-11ities (51300 9/20/1993 00131/ 00 095-7230-110.35-14 LUALities 0000447 SO. (Of. IF- EDISON CC1. ETAT. 9/30/1993 0000000 Fl 0000147 SO. CAI.TEC.1111NIA EDISON CCh1:7 IS 9/30/1993 0000000 0000147 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. PEN. 9/30/1993 0000000 IS AMOOHT , 9'4;11 . 0c.) 30 :I . 0() ;:t :I 4 1. .02 592.04 13700 9/20/1993 001310 00 050-9000-450.35-44 0000147 SO. CALIFORNIA EDISON w. 0755. 17.117.11 Utilities 9/30/1993 0000000 5000 9/17/J993 001319 00 010-9100-4311.74-10 0000922 SCOTSMAN MANUFACTURING CO CPX015740997 090,61 Renta1 Mobi1e. 111111Te 11.11, 9/70/1993 0000000 5900 9/14/1993 001320 00 010-7100-431.21-35 0001024 IASERTRON SERVICE LADDRAT 4502 4.60 Shinpinq 8 Oandting Teil AMMUflitiOTI 7/30/1993 0000000 N 6000 9/13/1993 001321 00 046-111000-400.30-95 0000409 DAVID TANSSIG 117 5.116,16 Pcofessio041 Cevviees C.F:D. *2 DeKt So7viro 9/70/1993 0000000 N 6100 9/13/1997 001322 00 037-3100-431.30-95 0000109 DAVID 76111113113 1.0 1.450.59 Rrofessiont,1 Secvices C.F.D. 413 Deltt Sevvice 9/30/1993 0000000 6200 9/13/1993 001323 00 042-0501-450.70-95 0000409 DAVID TA005TO 11 619.29 Li tite..i o oc.) .. eonA.D. 07-1 9/30/1993 0000000 REPAREK 9/70/93, 0:06:40 City of San Jacinto PAGE. T3 pRoccelm 01131.1311 ACTUUNTO PAYABLE UPDATE LIST OROUP MJNBER : 00055 AU U70-93 - Bair]) 03 ACCOUNTING PERIOD/YEAR: 0361994 OROUR USER ONHL ,,, --------- TRANEt 'TRAMS 11i111 ,,,olice,Hrk DK ACCOUNT NUMBER PRAT F.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAMF GUICRTPITON 1 ITE:1111LAMTION : DUE DATE cHrrK,1 CHECK DATE TYPE LASE TRANG INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT 6300 9/13/1297 001394 00 0.14 -P7,':.,0 -4!'''.0,30. 95 0000409 DAVID TAUSCIO 91,090.02 IT) olbubbiunal Sbubiub B.E.D. 01. 1001 521-vIee 9/30/1993 0000000 A 6400 9/01/1993 001.323, 00 010-7500-425.21-10 0001021 UNITED OFFICE PRODUCTS 7242 420.021 DB9 Ink for Xeiox Louie:- 9/30/1993 0000000 N 6900 9.012/1093 011 00 070 06.10-440.34-CU5 0001002 VALUERESTART 101MT. CBDIT Ca of 9/30/1993 0000000 M 6600 9/1364997 001327 00 096-9700-470.36-20 0001003 WESTERN C1:If02 MAGAZINE 2612.7 279,00 Job AdvevIibement ro,' Fuonomic Devi:Am:are:0 Abb.: 9/30/1993 0000000 N 0700 9601/1993 9013311 00 096 -':',.7:,-.,0-.470,.....!1-10 0000952 ARROW P17INI1NS :3:3216o 29 P6 Bubineb5 SUbdb 9/30/1997 0000000 N 6000 9/01/1993 001333 00 010 -1700 -417,21 -10 0000952 ARROW PRINTING 77060 1..aineB* bald, Tim Hulib 9/70/1993 0000000 N 6900 9,T1UUAT7 001334 00 010 -7200 -031..11 -10 0000752 ARROW P9UUTING 33060 AS,I116 Dubinebb Cud- Bob I.Iii.bun 9/30/1993 0000000 N 1'000 9/01/1993 00 010-1210-412.21. 10 0000952 ARROW PRINITNR '77060 745.26 hubinebb UTATE., Dan Thomun 9/3061993 0000000 N 901336 00 010 -Th.00 -171-21 311 0001.070 BLACK HI112 AMMUNITION 69912 2.291.50 (Wli111011 I I' I 0 rt i ' ki ! ij 1 (r l'' 0 I. i ,.` Deba":11..4:11. 9/30/1993 0000000 N 7200 Y/10/1997 00131.7 00 010 -7100 -131.,21 79 0001004 BumprEnrE WIlPI. tooLT: 40001 750,17 Ammunition F0B-chaue Po:U3:. 1u0arIment 9/30/1993 0000000 N 11300 9/10/1903 0013314 00 0109111.1:110-471.21-4.0 0001005 CALIFORNIA MAP rENTER 5F24 454..00 V a I. I. Ma 1:,:, -Di :3r:a : c 1 I I ' 0 I i 4:: e 0e:-. i3 I. 111,1•1 I. 9/30/1997 0000000 11 7400 5/21/4993 001739 00 019-4550-410,21-71 0000950 HECKMAN (101:311 07729 201.15 Front Wiudbilield Unit 903 -r,J,J, 9/30/1997 0000000 11 7',400 0/10/1993 001740 00 010 71300 -42,21 -10 0000299 HEMET RUDDER STAMP 36473 63.07 LiIMITI-1011 ER4..I.o1:,.u. 9/7061997 0000000 N 7600 9/02/1993 001311 00 010 -7400 -175.2A -50 0000671 J & J AMTGMOTIVE 113064 700.09 Ih El'' Ili 0-51: I e, 1 i filet Communi19 Cnter 9/30/1997 0000000 N 7700 9/0261993 001712 00 01-O-4150-410.21-50 0000631 J & J AuTnwITTw 10064 111,7,5 H4m-mosto1 7 lim0b Communit9 C6biter 9/70/1997 0000000 N Annual. 1oe0 AI tv:,1 Pooev6 Ha311:4 Snliodni f1EPARED 9630/93. 0:06:40 City of San Jacinto PROORAM 0M3130 ASCOHNTS PAYADLE UPDATE LIST 3I30t,ll MUMBLE : 0001511 - Daitch 13 ACCOUNTING 1:'LPIOD/YEAT4 03/1994 BROUP USER ANNE TRANS4 MANS NAIL. YOUCHFP DK MT:COUNT NIAMDFF prJ1J P.O. VENDOR VENDOR NAME INVOICE NUMMER DEGERIT4TUN 1 DSGEOITJTON 2 DUE DATE CHECK0 CHECK DATE TYPE JAST 'PANS 7000 S/14/1993 001343 00 012 4150-410.21-74 0000641 JOHNSON TRACTWE CO. It, 114„in1oodins 9/30/1993 0000000 CO022335 7900 12/19/1993 001344 00 02S-72E6-410.33-21. 0001020 MISSION ETESTRIC SUFETY 144904 OenecaL Stock StyeeI '0150/1993 0000000 0000 0/27-49113 00131E 00 0111 -11E0 410.10-41E S ora gni niai t I() I Tooji.„„ Enooljes 0100 0127/1903 001316 00 025-7100 410.21-10 Storage Voni4inern i 8O1:F11es 0001011 MOBILE HTNI 7.-30/1993 0000000 SIMFACE SYSTF 0564 000toll mnrarr MINT SIGRAGE 0'a311° 11E64 9/30/1993 0000000 8200 9/10/1993 001341' 00 010-3300-431,33-32 0000846 RAMONA BUSINESS MAC 51411. 110miiair Innewvites Five 1ieoc14sit Sm130/13'161: 0000000 8300 9/13/1993 001348 00 050-9000-4E0.31-110 0000176 AWWA 9630/1993 0000000 N 121(1. (1400 9/27/199.11 001340 00 010-1400-414,31-4E 0001000 ANNE HAI.A.21E12(3 RErli Mileage Keimbionemen1 S./3061993 0000000 COIN]: 02 AMOUNT.: 24,612.03 PACE 24 AMOUNT 60'1.12 140.02 DATE CITY OF SAN JACINTO TREASURER REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST 1993 AGE INSTITUTION INTEREST MATURITY PRINCIPAL SERIAL# RATE DATE AMOUNT 02-20-85 State-L.A.I.F. General Serial # 9833794 4.472 OPEN $4,320,075 01-19-88 State-L.A.I.F Redevelopment Serial # 5133120 4.472 OPEN $2,572,844 CHECKING First Interstate Serial # 3980000/1-98001 OPEN $74,641 CASH ON HAND $700 Total City & Redevelopment Investments $6,968,260 CASH WITH FISCAL AGENT (BOND FUNDS) UNION BANK CFD NO. 2 TOTAL CFD NO. 2 Account No. 7-11361 Citibank 7.81 9/01/2014 $2,084,624 Citibank 7.81 9/01/2014 $1,835,108 FHA Banks 7.45 2/25/1994 $815,496 Dreyfus Treas Cash Mgt OPEN $1,082,630 REDEVELOPMENT Account No. 7-15639 Dreyfus Treas Cash Mgt WATER-COP's Account No. 7-15584 Dreyfus Treas Cash Mgt $5,817,858 OPEN $3,873,199 OPEN S1,356,667 Total Cash with Fiscal Agent $11,047,724 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $18,015,984 I certify that these investments comply with all State Laws pertaining to the investment of Local Agency Funds and the City of San Jacinto's investment policies. There are sufficient funds to meet the City's next 30 days obligations. Ken Leahy, Tfeasurer CITY OF SAN JACINTO AGED 5 '. STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Nathaniel Holmes Ill, Acting Chief of Police via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: October 5, 1993 SUBJECT: Parking Enforcement Program RECOMMENDATION Waive the reading in full and read by title only (Second Reading) and adopt Ordinance No. 987 relating to regulation of parking and repealing Ordinance No. 358. FISCAL IMPACT The repeal of the old Ordinance and adoption of the proposed new parking ordinance in themselves will have no fiscal impact on the city. However, with the implementation of the mandated parking program, there could be a substantial increase in revenue which will now go directly to the City. BACKGROUND This is the second reading to adopt Ordinance No. 987 which was introduced on the September 21, 1993 council meeting. This Ordinance will repeal the previous Parking Ordinance No. 358. ORDINANCE NO. 987 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, A CALIFORNIA MUNICIPALITY, CONCERNING THE REGULATION OF VEHICULAR PARKING IN THE CITY AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION THEREOF The City Council of the City of San Jacinto does ordain as follows: ARTICLE ONE. IN GENERAL SECTION 1. This ordinance shall be known as the parking control ordinance of the City of San Jacinto. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this ordinance, unless it is plainly evident from the context that a different meaning is intended, certain terms used herein are defined as follows: Alley. A highway not exceeding thirty feet in width which is primarily used for access to the rear or side entrances of abutting property. Bicycle parking zone. That space exclusively reserved for the parking of bicycles. Loading zone. That space adjacent to a curb reserved for the exclusive use of vehicles during the loading or unloading of passengers or materials. Official time standard. Whenever certain hours are named in this ordinance, they shall mean standard time or day -light savings time, as may be in current use in the city. Park or narking. The standing of a vehicle, whether occupied or not, otherwise than temporarily for the purpose of and while actually engaged in loading or unloading of passengers or materials. Parkway. That tortion of a street or highway within a public right-of-way, other than a roadway or sidewalk, whether or not such parkway area be improved or landscaped. Passenger loading zone. The space adjacent to a curb reserved for the exclusive use of vehicles during the loading or unloading of passengers. Police Officer. Every sworn member of the police department or police reserves as per California Penal Code 830. Stop. Means complete cessation of movement. Stop or stand. When prohibited, means any stopping or standing of a vehicle, whether occupied or not, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a police officer or official traffic -control device. Traffic. Pedestrians, ridden or herded animals, vehicles and other conveyances either singly or together while using any street for the purposes of travel. Traffic -control devices. All signs, signals, markings and devices not inconsistent with this ordinance, placed or erected under this ordinance, as authorized by the Vehicle Code of the state or by the authority of this ordinance. Traffic engineer. The Chief of Police of the city, and/or such other person designated by the City Council. Traffic lane. That portion of any roadway, either marked or unmarked, being not less than eight and one-half feet in width. Vehicle Code definitions. In addition to the definitions set forth in this section, all definitions of words and phrases set forth in the Vehicle Code of the state are hereby incorporated in this ordinance as though set forth in full herein. SECTION 3. DUTY AND AUTHORITY OF POLICE TO DIRECT TRAFFIC AND ENFORCE TRAFFIC REGULATIONS. It shall be the duty of the members of the police department, or such persons as authorized by the City Council, to enforce ail parking regulations of the city and all of the state vehicle laws applicable to parking violations in the city. SECTION 4. APPLICABILITY TO AUTHORIZED EMERGENCY VEHICLES. The provisions of this ordinance regulating the operation, parking and standing of vehicles shall not apply to any vehicle of the police or fire departments, any public ambulance or ,any public utility vehicle or any private ambulance, which public utility vehicle or private ambulance has aualified as an authorized emergency vehicle, when any vehicle mentioned in this section is operated in the manner specified in the Vehicle Code of the state in response to an emergency call. SECTION 5, APPLICABILITY TO GOVERNMENTAL VEHICLES GENERALLY. The provisions of this ordinance shall apply to the driver of any vehicle owned by or used in the service of the United States government, this state, any county or city, and it shall he unlawful for any such driver to violate any of the provisions of this ordinance, except as otherwise permitted in this ordinance or by state statute. SECTION 6. AUTHORITY OF TRAFFIC ENGINEER GENERALLY. (a) The traffic engineer shall have the power and duty to place and maintain or cause co be placed and maintained official traffic -control devices when and as reauired under this ordinance to make effective the Provisions of this ordinance. 2 b) Whenever the Vehicle Code of the state reauires, for the effectiveness of any provision thereof, that traffic - control devices be installed to give notice to the public of the application of such law, the traffic engineers hereby authorized to install or cause to be installed the necessary devices, subject to any limitations or restrictions set forth in the law applicable thereto. (c) The traffic engineer may also place and maintain such additional traffic -control devices as he may deem necessary to regulate traffic or to guide or warn traffic but he shall make such determination only upon the basis of traffic engineering principles and traffic investigations and in accordance with such standards, limitations and rules as may be set forth in this ordinance or as may be determined by other ordinances or resolutions of the legislative body of this city. SECTION 7. REQUIRED FOR ENFORCEMENT OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS. No provision of the Vehicle Code of the state or of this ordinance for which signs are required shall be enforced against an alleged violator unless appropriate signs are in place any: sufficiently legible to be seen by an ordinarily observant person, giving notice of such provisions of the traffic laws. SECTION 8. AUTHORITY TO REMOVE, RELOCATE OR DISCONTINUE. The traffic engineer is hereby authorized to remove, relocate or discontinue the placement or operation of any traffic -control devices or signs not specifically required by state law or this ordinance whenever he shall determine in any particular case that the condition which warranted or required the installation no longer exists or obtains. SECTION 9. HOURS OF OPERATION. The traffic engineer shall determine the hours and days during which any traffic -control device shall be in operation or be in effect, except in those cases where such hours and days are specified in this ordinance. SECTION 10. APPLICABILITY TO CITY -OWNED, PUBLIC UTILITY AND POST OFFICE VEHICLES. The provisions of the ordinance regulating the parking or standing of vehicles shall not apply to any vehicle of a city department or public utility while necessarily in use of construction or maintenance work upon the streets of the city, or any vehicle owned by the United States while in use for the collection, transportation or delivery of United States mail. SECTION APPLICAEILII - OF PROVISIONS PROHIBITING STOPPING, STANDING CR PARKING. (a) The provisions of this ordinance prohibiting the EtoDpl=_g, standing or parkin: of a Vehicle shay_ apply except when it is necessary to stop a vehicle toavoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with directions of a police officer or official traffic -control device. (b) The provisions of this ordinance imposing a time limit on standing or parking shall not relieve any person from the duty to observe other and more restrictive provisions of the Vehicle Code of the state or of this ordinance prohibiting or limiting the standing or parking of vehicles in specified places or at specified times. SECTION 12. PARKING, ETC., IN PARKWAYS. No person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle wthin any parkway, except on a permanent or temporary driveway. SECTION 13. .SE OF STREETS FOR STORAGE OF VEHICLES. (a) No person who owns or has possession, custody or control of any vehicle shall park such vehicle upon any street or alley for more than a consecutive period of seventy-two hours. Kb) In the event a vehicle is parked or left standing upon a street in excess of a consecutive period of seventy-two hours, any authorized member of the police department may remove such vehicle from the street in the manner and subject to the requirements of the Vehicle Code of the state. SECTION 14. PARKING FOR CERTAIN PURPOSES PROHIBITED. No person shall park a vehicle upon any roadway or public or private property, or the city property, for the eroncipal purpose of: (a) Displaying such vehicle for sale. (b) Servicing, repairing or otherwise working on such vehicle except repairs necessitated ran emergency. SECTION 15. PARKING PARALLEL WITH CURB. (a) the traffic engineer is authorized to determine when standing or parking shall be prohibited upon the left-hand side of any one-way street or alley. (b) The requirement of parallel parking shall not apply in the event any commercial vehicle is actually engaged in the process cf loading or unloading freight or goods, in which case that vehicle may be backed up ec the curb; provided that such vehicle does not extend beyond the center line of the street and does not blocktraffic thereby. SECTION " ANGLE PARKING. (a) Whenever any provision of this ordinance or other ordinance or resolution of the city designates and describes any street. or portion thereof =on which angle Parking shall be permitted, the traffic engineer shall mark or sign such street Indicating the angle at which vehicles shall be parked. (b) When signs or markings are in place indicating angle parking, as herein provided, no person shall park or stand a vehicle other than at the angle to the curb or edge of the roadway indicated by such signs or markings. SECTION 17. PARKING ADJACENT TO SCHOOLS. (a) The traffic engineer is hereby authorized to place signs or markings indicating no parking upon any street or portion thereof adjacent to any school property when such parking would, in his/her opinion, interfere with traffic or create a hazardous condition. (b) When official sins or markings are installed indicating no parking upon a street or portion thereof adiacent to any school property, no person shall park a vehicle in any such designated place. SECTION is. TRAFFIC ENGINEER TO ERECT SIGNS PROHIBITING STOPPING, STANDING OR PARKING IN CERTAIN PLACES. In order to eliminate dangerous traffic hazards at any place where the traffic engineer may determine such co be necessary he shall place an appropriate sign or mark and when so signed or marked, no person shall stop, stand or part a vehicle in any such place. SECTION 19. LOADING AND UNLOADING ZONE REGULATIONS. (a) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized, subject to the provisions and limitations of this chapter, to place, and when reduired herein shall place, sins or the following curb markings to indicate Parking or standing reaulations, and such curb markings shall have the meanings as herein set forth: (1) Red shall mean no stopping, standing or Parking at any time except as permitted by the Vehicle Code of the state and except that a bus may stop in a red zone marked or signed as a bus zone. (2) Yellow shall mean no stopping, standing, or parking at any time between 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. of any day except Sundays and holidays for anv purpose other than the loading and unloading of passengers or materials; provided that The loading or unloading of passengers shall not consume more than three minutes nor the loading or unloading of materials more than six minutes. (3) White shall mean no stopping, standina or harking for any purpose other than loading or unloading of passengers which shall not exceed three minutes, and such restrictions shall apply at all times. (4) Green shall mean no standing or parking for longer than ten minutes at any time between 900 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. of any day except Sundays and holidays. (b) When the traffic engineer, as authorized under this section has caused signs or curb markings to be placed, no person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle adjacent to any such legible sign or curb marking in violation of any of the provisions of this section. (c) The curb signs and markings shall be as follows: (1) At any place -in the business district. (2) Elsewhere in front of or adjacent to any place of business, school, park, building, hall or place used for the purposes of public assembly. (d) In no event shall more than one-half of the total curb length in any block be reserved for loading zone purposes. (e) Whenever curb marking is used, loading zones shall be indicated by a yellow paint line stenciled with black letters "LOADING ZONE" upon the top of all curbs in such zones. (5) Blue shall mean no parking or standing unless a valid California Department of Motor Vehicle disabled person's placard or plate is displayed. SECTION 20. LOADING AND UNLOADING ZONES - APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. (a) Permission herein granted to stop or stand a vehicle for purposes of loading or unloading of materials shall apply only to commercial vehicles and shall not extend beyond the time necessary therefore and in no event for more than six minutes. (b) The loading or unloading of materials shall apply only to commercial deliveries; also, the delivery or pickup of express and parcel pcst packages and United States mail. (d) Permission herein granted to stop or park for purposes of loading or unloading passengers shall include the loading or unloading of personal baggage but shall. not extend beyond the time necessary therefore and in no event for more than three minutes. (d) The provisions of this section shall be enforced so as to accommodate necessary and reasonable loading or unloading but without permitting abuse of the privileges hereby granted. SECTION 21, COMMERCIAL VEHICLES (a) No commercial vehicle (truck, tractor or trailer) shall be parked in a residential district (as defined under residential zoning laws) on a public roadway between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., including weekends and holidays. (b) No commercial vehicle shall be parked in a commercial district (as defined in commercial zoning laws) on a public roadway for more than seventy-two hours. (c) Special permission may be granted to exempt commercial vehicles from sub -sections (a) and 'b) only under extreme circumstances. This permission may be granted by the Chief of Police or his/her designee. Such exemption shall not exceed seventy-two hours in residential areas and one hundred twenty hours in commercial areas. (d) A commercial vehicle is defined as, but not limited to the following: (I) Any vehicle or combo with a weight of 10,000 pounds or more gross weight. (2) Tire size of seventeen inches. (3) Any truck, tractor or trailer used to transport property or goods. (4) This section does not apply to "pick-up" trucks and/or travel type trailers, horse trailers. SECTION 22. PARKING, ETC., IN ALLEYS. When official signs prohibiting such parking are in place, no person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle within an alley for any purpose other than loading or unloading of materials. Such parking shall not exceed twenty minutes. In no event shall the driver of such vehicle leave less than one traffic lane for unobstructed passage. SECTION 23. WORKING ON VEHICLES ON PUBLIC ROADWAYS. (a) In order to eliminate dangerous traffic hazards, working on any motor vehicle on a public street including commercial and/or residential district is prohibited. (b) No motor vehicle shall be left standing on a public street in a commercial or residential district on wooden blocks, jack stands, or metal car ramps. SECTION 24. RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKING. (a) Recreational vehicles are defined as travel trailer, pickup trucks with campers (except camper shells) mini motor homes, and motor homes of all classes. (b) Recreational vehicles will be allowed to park on public streets in a residential district for not more than 72 hours or in a commercial district for not more than 120 hours. (c) Habitation of recreational vehicles is strictly Prohibited. SECTION 25. DESIGNATION OF PROHIBITED OR LIMITED PARKING ZONES BY ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION OF CITY COUNCIL. (a) The City Council shall, by ordinance or resolution, designate those streets or portions of streets upon which parking shall be limited to one hour or two hours, and the traffic engineer shall designate such streets or portions of streets by appropriate signs. (b) When authorized signs are in place giving notice of such prohibition or limitation, no person shall stop, stand or park any vehicle in violation of such sign. MARKINGS, SECTION 26. INSTALLATION AND USE OF BARKING SPACE (a) The traffic engineer is authorized to install and maintain parking space markings to indicate parking spaces adjacent to curbing and in municipally owned or operated parking lots where authorized parking is permitted. (b) When such parking space markings are placed in the highway and in city operated parking lots, subject to other and more restrictive limitations, no vehicle shall be stopped, left standing or parked other than within a single space unless the size or shape of such vehicle makes compliance impossible. SECTION 27. INSTALLATION AND OBEDIENCE TO EMERGENCY PARKING SIGNS. (a) Whenever the Chief of Police shall determine that an emergency traffic congestion is likely to result from the holding of public or private assemblages, gatherings or functions or for other reasons, the Chief of Police shall have power and authority to authorize temporary signs, devices, or barricades to be erected or posted indicating that the operation, parking or standing of vehicles is prohibited on such streets and alleys as the Chief of Police shall direct during the time such temporary signs are in place. Such signs, devices or barricades shall remain in place only during the existence of such emergency, and the Chief of Police shall cause such signs to be removed promptly thereafter. (b) When signs, devices or barricades authorized by the provisions of this section are in place giving notice thereof no person shall operate, park or stand any vehicle contrary to the directions and provisions of such signs. SECTION 28. PARKING VEHICLES LEFT FOR REPAIR OR No person shall park, cause to be parked or allow to be parked on any street or city operated parking lot, a motor vehicle or any service vehicle left under his control or in his possession for service or repair except along the side of the street adjacent to and directly in front of his place of business. SERVICE. SECTION 29. PARKING ON CITY PROPERTY. (a) Whenever the city shall determine that the orderly, efficient conduct of the city's business requires that Parking or standing of vehicles on city property owned or controlled by the city be prohibited, limited or restricted, the traffic engineer shall have the power and authority to order signs to be erected or posted or curb markings to be placed indicating that the parking of vehicles is thus prohibited, limited or restricted. (b) When signs or curb markings authorized by the provisions of this section are in place giving notice thereof, no cerson shall park or stand any vehicle contrary to the directions or provisions cf such signs or curb markings. SECTION 30. VEHICLES NOT TO OBSTRUCT STREETS OR MUNICIPAL PARKING LOTS. No person shall operate or stand or park any vehicle on any street or in any parking lot owned or controlled by the city in such a manner as to obstruct the free use of such street or parking lot. It shall be unlawful for any person to use any municipally owned or controlled parking lot for commercial purposes, for storage, for displaying vehicles or other property for resaleor for any other purposes other than for temporary parking of motor vehicles. SECTION 31. BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. (a) The traffic engineer is hereby authorized to designate and establish bicycle parking spaces for use at such places and during such times as he may deem suitable and necessary. The traffic engineer may also authorize the placing of bicycle parking racks in the space so designated. (b) When official signs or markings restricting parking to bicycles only are in place, bicycles shall be parked only in such places and it shall be unlawful for any person to park or stand any vehicle other than a bicycle or other two - wheeled vehicle with less than five brake horsepower. ZONES. SECTION 32. ESTABLISHMENT, MARKING AND USE OF BUS (a) The traffic engineer is hereby authorized to established bus zones for the loading and unloading of buses or common carriers of passengers and to determine the location thereof subject to the limitations set forth herein. (b) The work "busn, as used in this section, shall mean any motor bus, motor coach or passenger stage used as a common carrier of passengers. (c) No bus zone shall exceed eighty feet in length, except that when satisfactory evidence has been presented to the traffic engineer showing the necessity therefore, the traffic engineer may extend bus zones not to exceed a total length of one hundred and thirty feet. (d) Bus zones shall normally be established on the far side of an intersection. (e) Such bus zones shall be indicated by signs or a red line stenciled with white letters "BUS ZONE" upon the top of all curbs within such zone. (f) No bus shall stand in any bus zone longer than necessary to load or unload passengers. (g) No person shall stop, stand or park any vehicle except a bus in any bus zone. Q SECTION 33. FIRE LANES. (a) The Fire Chief is hereby given the authority to require areas to be cleared of obstructions and maintained as Fire Lanes at any location where he has determined that the circumstances are such that without such Fire Lanes the entry by and use of fire apparatus for fire suppression, emergency medical or rescue purposes would be obstructed or otherwise rendered unduly difficult. (b) Appropriate markings or signs of a type specified by the Fire Chief, in accordance with the California Vehicle Code, shall be placed by the owner of the land in those locations approved by the Fire Chief. Signs must be mounted on the face of a building, or on a post in plain view. (c) All curbing along .fire lanes shall be painted red on all faces (horizontal, vertical, etc.). If no curbs are provided, the area of the fire lane shall be marked with a four inch red stripe the length of the fire lane with the words "FIRE LANE" written in a contrasting color and clearly visible from a vehicle. id) No person shall stop or park a vehicle within, or otherwise obstruct any area designated as a fire lane pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 22500.1 or any area designated as a Fire Lane by the Fire Chief. SECTION 34. MT. SAN JACINTO (a) The City Council of San regulations as required by the College related to campus parking facilities. (b) Authorized permits shall sight. (c) Temporary, visitor or special permits as established by the College Board of Trustees as related Parking facilities shall be displayed in plain sight. SECTION 35. PARKING VEHICLES TRANSPORTING EXPLOSIVES OR INFLAMMABLES. It shall be unlawful for any person to leave standing any truck, tank truck or trailer arranged or designed for the transportation of inflammable gases or liquids, or explosives of any kind or description unattended on any street in the city between the hours of 6:00 P.M. and 5:00 a.m. of the day following unless such vehicle is in service between such hours. in plain 2.0 COLLEGE PARKING PERMITS. Jacinto adopts parking Board of Trustees as at all times be displayed to campus ARTICLE TWO. PENALTY, VALIDITY, REPEAL AND CERTIFICATION. SECTION 36. PENALTY. Any person, firm or corporation, violating any of the provisions of this ordinance, shall be punished by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars. Such person, firm, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate violation thereof, for each day during any portion of which any violation hereof is committed, continued or permitted and shall be punishable as herein provided. SECTION 37. CITATION AND NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF PARKING REGULATIONS: EVIDENCE OF UNLAWFUL PARKING. Any prosecution charging a violation of any regulation governing the standing or parking cf a motor vehicle under this ordinance, shall be processed in accordance with the procedures established in ARTICLE 3, Chapter 1, Division 17 of the California Vehicle Code (Sections 40200 et. seq.). Any violation of the provisions of this ordinance shall be subject to such civil penalties as shall be established and in effect pursuant to a resolution of the City Council made concurrently herewith or as may hereafter be modified. SECTION 32. VALIDITY. If any section, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance, is for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall, not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, sub -section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions thereof, be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 39. REPEAL. Ordinance Numbers any other ordinances or parts thereof, conflicting with the provisions hereof, are hereby repealed. SECTION 40. CERTIFICATION. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 36933, and the same shall thereupon take effect as provided by law. 11 INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, duly held on the 21st day of September , 1993. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council duly held on the 5th day of Ortnt=r 1993, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Councilmen Councilmen ABSENT: Councilmen ATTEST: City Clerk - City of San Jacinto MAYOR - CITY OF SAN JACINTO 12 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager October 5, 1993 Adoption of Ordinance No. 988 Zoning Ordinance Amendment 5-93 NDA 5-4 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 988, waive the reading of the Ordinance in full and read by title only. BACKGROUND On September 21, 1993, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. 988, amending the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to the processing of conditional and temporary conditional use permits. ORDINANCE NO. 988 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 5-93 IS HEREBY APPROVED THEREBY AMENDING ORDINANCE 340, ARTICLE 17.05, ARTICLE 17.06, ARTICLE 17.12 AND ESTABLISHING ARTICLE 17.13 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Zoning Ordinance Amendment 5-93 is hereby approved thereby amending Ordinance 340, Article 17.05, Article 17.06, Article 17.12 and establishing Article 17.13, as shown on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein. Section 2. This ordinance will take effect thirty (30) days from the passage thereof. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County of Riverside, State of California. Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 21st day of September 1993. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 5th day of October, 1993 by the following vote. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST Deputy City Clerk -1- CERTIFICA IL STA l E. OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO, I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. 988 duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the 5th day of October, 1993. WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of Deputy City Clerk -2 - ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 5-93 ORDINANCE NO. 988 EXHIBIT "A" 17.05 EFFECTIVE DATE OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT; CITY COUNCIL A. An action to approve a conditional use permit shall require a majority vote of the cntiro a quorum of the Planning Commission. B. Ratification of City Council 1. Projects approved by the Planning Commission The approval of any conditional use permit by the Planning Commission shall be subject to review and ratification by the City Council. The conditional use permit application approval, subject to ratification. shall be placed on the agenda for the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting not less than five (5) calendar days after the approval by the Planning Commission. Ratification may be made upon the Council's consent portion of the Agenda. The City Council shall either ratify, as unaltered, the decision of the Planning Commission (other than correction of clerical or other insignificant matters) or set the matter for public hearing before the City Council. The City Council shall not ratify any conditional use permit, but shall set the matter for public hearing, if within five (5) calendar days following the decision of the Planning Commission any person aggrieved by the Planning Commission's approval shall submit a written request with the applicable appeal filing fee, requesting the Council to set the matter for public hearing and generally describing the nature of the request for review. The City Council may reject and refuse to set or hear the appeal of any person whose objection was not made or otherwise perfected at the previous public hearing before the Planning Commission. Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent the Council from setting the matter for public hearing on its own motion. Notice of the public hearing shall be made pursuant to Section 17.04 A, above. After the public hearing so set before the City Council, the Council may ratify, approve or reject the conditional use permit and may amend or modify the conditions for approval of the Permit. The decision of the City Council following ratification or following the public hearing set pursuant to this provision, shall be final. 2. Projects Denied by the Planning Commission A decision of the Planning Commission denying an application for a conditional use permit, may be appealed to the City Council by the applicant or other person aggrieved thereby. Said appeal must be submitted in writing within five (5) calendar days after the decision by the Planning Commission accompanied with the appropriate appeal filing fee. The City Clerk shall thereafter schedule the matter for public hearing before the City Council and provide notice pursuant to the provisions of Section 17.04 A, above. The decision of the City Council following hearing shall be final. written notice of thc dccision to thc City Clerk. Thc City Clerk shall notify the City Council of the decision by placing the matter on the written 'gonda not less 10 nor more than 30 days following thc datc of the decision. The dccision shall become final 30 days following the date of the decision I an app al has been filed within the prescribed 15 day app al period, Planning Commission has requested review of its decision. 17.06 APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL NEW APPLICATION may be appealed to the City Council by the applicant or any other person aggrieved thereby, and must be submitted within fifteen (15) days in writing on an app al is affirmative, the conditional usc permit shall b immediately after it is granted. ,k Now Application Following the denial of a conditional use permit application or the revocation of a conditional use permit, no application for a conditional use permit for the same use of substantially the same site shall be filed within one year from the date of denial or revocation of the permit. 17.12 TEMPORARY CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS; PLANNING COMMISSION A. The Planning Commission may approve structures or uses that are of a temporary nature, valid for a period of not more than one (1) year up to five (5) years after the date of approval, subject to extension, the amount of time to be determined by the Commission. The Commission is authorized to approve any temporary use or structure it deems appropriate regardless of Section 17.04. Subsection (C)3. a. and c. of this article. (See note below) B. Notwithstanding Section 17.12 (A) above, the Procedure for approval of a temporary conditional land use shall be identical to the procedure for obtaining conditional land use approval as set forth in this article, including ratification by the City Council. An application for an extension of time of a temporary conditional land use permit shall be filed prior to the expiration date of the original temporary conditional land use permit. The expiration of the temporary conditional land use permit shall be stayed until the Planning Commission determines whether to grant the extension. C. The Planning Commission may establish conditions it deems necessary in regard to the proposed use to carry out the intent and purpose of this ordinance. D. Delete (D) in its entirety. See Section 17.13 below. 17.13 TEMPORARY LAND USE PERMITS; DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. The Director of Community Development may approve structures or uses of a temporary nature, valid for a period of not more than one (1) year after the date of approval, sublect to extension except as noted elsewhere in this section. B. The procedure for approval of temporary land uses subject to this section requires the submittal of the appropriate form, including any exhibits required by the Department of Community Development, accompanied by the appropriate fee. C. The Director of Community Development may establish any conditions he/she deems necessary in regard to the proposed use to carry out the intent and purpose of this ordinance. D. The Director of Community Development is authorized to grant the following temporary uses: 1. Off -site storage of equipment during construction activities. 2. Off -site sales or construction offices used during construction activities. 3. Storage of structures or equipment including boats and trailers. 4. Office and/or storage space. 5. Agricultural uses. 6. Temporary caretakers quarters. 7. Temporary events, such as grand openings, carnivals, revivals and the like. Event shall not to exceed 30 days per calendar year, nor more than 15 consecutive days. 8. Other uses of a temporary nature, which are deemed to be similar to those listed above. TO: FROM: DATE: AGENDA STAFF REPORT Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Les Evans, Director of Public Works via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager October 5, 1993 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING POLICY FOR FISCAL ADMINISTRATION OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS Recommendation: ,`adopt Resolution No. of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto Establishing Policy for Fiscal Administration of Construction Contracts. Background and Analysis: Over the past year, the City Council has awarded many public works construction contracts in amounts ranging from under $10,000 to over $2.5 million. Often, during the construction of the projects, it is necessary to make a change in the contract plans due to changed or unforseen conditions, due to identification of additional desirable work that should be accomplished or simply due to an error on the plans. Often, if a contractor discovers an unknown obstacle not shown on the plans, or has a better idea of how to accomplish the construction, work stops until a decision can be made on how to proceed. If the work is stopped for more than a few minutes, the contractor becomes eligible for damages due to delay. When work stops, City staff must quickly resolve the problem to avoid claims for delay. In the past, the City has had no formal procedure providing direction to City staff on their authority to authorize changes in work which increase contract amounts. The proposed policy will allow approval of contract change orders by the City Manager if the contract amount will not increase by more than 10% or $25,000 of the project total. If the change order exceeds 10% or $25,000, Council authorization is required. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ESTABLISHING POLICY FOR FISCAL ADMINISTRATION OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto is constantly engaged in the administration of construction contracts awarded by the City Council; and WHEREAS, from time to time unforseen conditions arise which create a need to authorize additional work under a previously awarded contract; and WHEREAS, delay in authorizing additional work may create a public safety hazard or open the City to delay claims by the Contractor. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City Council of the City of San Jacinto establish the following policy: The City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, may authorize an increase in the total cost of a City Council approved construction contract by 10% of the original contract amount or $25,000 whichever is less, as follows: If, in the estimation of the City Manager, or the City Manager's designee, there are overriding economic or public safety and convenience concerns involved in stopping a project in order to receive City Council approval for additional work, the project may proceed under the following conditions: a. The City Council receives written notice of the circumstances. b. The Finance Director finds that the funds are available for the additional work. c. The City Council is asked to ratify the additional work at their next regular meeting. In all other cases, the City Council must approve contract change orders before work proceeds. MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF OCTOBER, 1993, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: Deputy City Clerk Mayor CERTIFICATION The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. duly adopted by the said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein. Deputy City Clerk AE OA STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: October 5, 1993 SUBJECT: Ratification of Conditional Use Permit 2-93 This Conditional Use Permit was on the City Council agenda for ratification at the September 7, 1993 meeting. It was removed from the agenda at the request of the applicant, due to uncertainties as to whether or not rooftop arches could be allowed. As a result, the Planning Commission must review the proposal again pertaining to signage and architecture. The Planning Commission will hold a special meeting on October 5, 1993 related to this Conditional Use Peiinit. At that meeting, the Planning Commission will be considering the following three items: A. Zoning. Determination: The Commission will be asked to determine if the proposed rooftop arches are architectural features or signage. B. Review Architecture: Since the Planning Commission approved the architecture the applicant has withdrawn its original plan and submitted a new plan. The new plan does not have a tower and the Planning Commission will need to approve the elimination of the approved tower. C. Variance 2-93: If the Planning Commission determines that the proposed rooftop arches are signage as defined in the zoning, ordinance this variance will need to be approved in order for the arches to be allowed on the roof of the proposed McDonalds Restaurant. If the arches are determined by the Planning Commission to be architectural features, this variance will not he necessary. Should the Planning Commission determine the arches are architectural features and approve the removal of the tower, then this Conditional Use Permit can be ratified by the City Council at your October 5, 1993 meeting, as scheduled. However, should the Commission determine that the arches are signage, deny the variance, and require the tower to remain, then the applicant will need to file an appeal with the City Council. If the proposal is appealed to the Council, consideration of the appeal could be scheduled for the October 19, 1993, Council meeting, since proper noticing would be required. CITY OF SAN JACINTO STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: September 7, 1993 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit 2-93 APPLICANT: McDonald's Corporation 4370 La Jolla Village Dr. Ste. 800 San Diego, CA (619) 535-8900 Ext. 270 LOCATION: East side of State Street approximately 125 north of Ramona Blvd. DESCRIPTION A proposal to establish a 3000 square foot fast food restaurant with a drive through facility RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission requests ratification of C.U.P. 2-93 by the City Council. DISCUSSION C.U.P. 2-93 was approved by the Planning Commission on August 24, 1993. The zoning of the subject site is C-2, General Commercial. The C-2, General Commercial Zone is intended to serve as a central shopping District for the convenience of the city. The subject use is a conditionally permitted use because of the drive -up window. The surrounding land use is composed of the retail development to the west (across State Street) and the San Jacinto High School to the east. To the south of the proposed McDonald's Restaurant (across Ramona Blvd.) is a vacant commercial building. The restaurant itself is a part of a proposed retail center. Attachments: Conditions of Approval Site Plan Conceptual Elevations CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CUP 2-93 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the City shall assign one of the following conditions the applicant shall comply with. a) Pay storm drain fee in effect at time of building permits. (currently $5,990/acre) b) Join a flood control drainage district 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall pay the currently effective traffic signal mitigation fees (currently $2,700.00 per acre). 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall pay all school fees mandated by Government Code 65995-65997 to finance school facilities. 4. Prior to the issuance of a preliminary (rough) grading permit, the developer shall submit a soils report to the Planning Department. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer may have to annex into CFD #3 for public safety mitigation. 6. The developer shall pay the regional and local roadway mitigation fee in effect at that time (currently $500.00/acre for local and $820.00/acre for regional. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the developer shall install Marbelite street light pole, if deemed necessary by the Public Works Director, per City standards and specifications. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the developer shall purchase "Street Trees" from the City and install them in public right of way. 3. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the facility shall be connected to the public sewer system. 4. Prior to approval of a building permit application, the developer shall have approved plans which depict the following improvements along with adequate security posted to ensure timely completion: a. Construct a 5.5' sidewalk per City standards; b. 24 inch gutter with curbs is required along State Street (curb height shall be 6" minimum and may be as high as 8" if required by a Hydrology report). c. Signing and striping for public and private rights of way. d. Construct high speed return on entrance drive. e. All landscape areas shall have automatic, moisture sensing watering system. 5. All improvements mandated by Public Works Condition #4, shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy. 6. Dedicate State Street to its ultimate right-of-way and enter into an agreement with the City to widen and construct State Street to its ultimate right-of-way. 7. Pay recapture fee for waterline in State Street. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The use hereby permitted is for a fast food facility located on A.P.N. 434-070-020. The effective date of issuance of this permit is the date it is ratified by the City Council. The applicants must activate the permit within twelve months after ratification or it is null and void. 2. Prior to approval of a building permit, the developer shall submit landscape and automatic watering system plans for the proposed restaurant. All landscaping improvements shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Use and Occupancy. 3. Provide a 3' berm or landscape screen along State Street adjacent to the drive through lanes to block lights from oncoming traffic. 4. The trash enclosure shall be provided per City of San Jacinto standards. 5. Al] applicable development fees effective at the time of issuance of the building permits shall be paid. 6. Al] new and existing utilities shall be located underground as per Ordinance #820. 7. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all utility substructures shall be located and/or screened with landscaping materials so as to minimize visibility from public rights of way. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit final grading, parking, paving, and landscaping plans for approval. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, black address numbers on white fluorescent background shall be painted on the curb (numbers shall be a minimum 4 inches in height). 10. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer consult with the San Jacinto Post Office regarding the type and placement of the mail box. 11. Grading and public improvements shall be installed in accordance with City standards and specifications. 12. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant will be required to submit a lighting plan to ensure that the amount of illumination is adequate and that all indirect rays will be confined to the premises. 13. All conditions of approval indicated for Site Plan 8-93 related to the development of this site shall be complied with. 14. No signs are approved pursuant to this Conditional Use Permit. Prior to the installation of any on site advertising or directional signs, a signing plan shall be submitted pursuant to the requirements of Article 16 of Ordinance 340. In order for arches on top of the building to be approved, the applicant shall apply for and receive a variance. 15. In the event the use hereby permitted ceases operation for a period of one year or more, this approval shall become null and void. 16. The premises shall be continuously maintained in a safe, clean, and orderly condition with trash receptacles provided. The restaurant manager shall submit a plan for graffiti monitoring and removal. 17. The premises shall he fully and adequately lighted for easy observation of all areas. 18. The San Jacinto Planning Department will review the operation of the proposed C.U.P. to ensure compliance with all conditions after six months of operation and again after twelve months. The cost of this review may be found in the Planning Department current fee schedule under the heading " Environmental Monitoring and Condition Enforcement." The current fee is $50.00. 19. "No Loitering" signs must be posted to discourage loitering outside the establishment, in accordance with Police Department requirements. 20. Bicycle storage racks shall be maintained. 21. The building shall be architecturally harmonious with the center that is planned for the site, as well as the existing center located to the southwest, as determined by staff. Additionally the drive through service windows shall be screened from view by landscaping as approved by the Planning Commission at their August 24, 1993 meeting. 22. All utilities shall be underground. 23. All projections and equipment be screened from public view. 24. Two handicap parking stalls must be provided. 25. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy the permittee must construct a six foot decorative block wall shall be placed on the property line between the retail center site and the San Jacinto High School 26. The "Playland" shall be compatible in color with the colors of the building. 27. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy the permittee must demonstrate compliance with all conditions of approval to the Planning Department of the City of San Jacinto. POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all required traffic signs shall be installed in accordance with the standards and specifications of the City Traffic Engineer. 2. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the "Drive Through Lane is to Designated as a Fire Lane" and marked appropriately. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATING MONITORING 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, developer shall provide a Declaration stating how all significant environmental concerns will be mitigated. 2. Upon the start of construction, at six month intervals thereafter, and prior to occupancy the developer shall provide a status report relating to compliance with the mitigating measures. 3. Prior to occupancy, the City shall verify compliance with the mitigating measures. FIRE DEPARTMENT INCORPORATE HEREIN THE FIRE DEPARTMENT'S CHECKLIST DA I'LD JULY 27, 1993. Fire and Life Safety Deparrment APPLICANT: !17G DONALD'S CORPORATION b/9- 535 - 13900 1.1370 LA JOLLA VILLAGE DR S7E SW SRN 0/E60. CA 72l MEETING DATE: 7—Z7-93 SITE PLAN# B - 93 1) PERMITS REQUIRED BY SECTION-4.108 YES NO_ 2) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD SHALL BE PROVIDED & MAINTAINED IN ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. SECTION 10.207. YES NO v WIDTH SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 20 FEET. VERTICAL CLEARANCE UNOBSTRUCTED VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF NOT LESS THAN 13 FEET, 6 INCHES. SURFACE OF ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND MAINTAINED TO SUPPORT THE IMPOSED LOADS OF FIRE APPARATUS AND SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A SURFACE SO AS TO PROVIDE ALL—WEATHER DRIVING CAPABILITIES. 3) ROADS IN EXCESS OF 150 FEET IN LENGTH SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH APPROVED PROVISIONS FOR THE TURNING AROUND OF FIRE APPARATUS. YES NO 4) PROVIDE PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AS DESIGNATED BY THIS DEPARTMENT AND NFPA, SECTION 10.303. YES 5) PROVIDE AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. ORDINANCE #917. YES NO- 6) FULL FIRE PROTECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED & ACCEPTED BEFORE THE COMMENCEMENT OF FRAMING. 7) PROVIDE FIRE DEPARTMENT WITH A SCALE MAP OF PROJECT. / (8-1/2 x 11") YES c/ NO_ 8) KEY BOX — SECTION 10.209. KEY BOX SHALL BE A TYPE APPROVED BY THE FIRE CHIEF & SHALL CONTAIN KEYS, MAP TO SCALE, HAZARDOUS MATERIAL LIST. YES L NO_ 9) FIRE FLOWS SHALL BE /6OC GALLONS PER MINUTE AT 20 PSI RESIDUAL. OPERATING PRESSURE MUST BE AVAILABLE BEFORE ANY COMBUSTIBLE MATERIAL IS PLACED ON THE JOB SITE. YES L.---7--NO ___ 37� 10) INSTALL A :UCLR FIRE HYDRANT (JAMES JONES • 6" X 7.-?lix y" ) WITHIN ZOO' FEET OF ALL PARTS OF THE BUILDING AS DESIGNATED BY THE FIRE DEPT. COMMERCIAL & YES ✓ NO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT. NO YES NO Fire and Life Safety Department 11) FIRE HYDRANT SPACING IS EVERY '/00 ' FEET AS LOCATED BY THE FIRE DEPT. YES— NO 12) RELOCATE HYDRANTS TO YES NO 13) UPGRADE THE NEAREST HYDRANT TO A SUPER HYDRANT. YES NO ✓ 14) HYDRANTS TO BE PAINTED W/REFLECTIVE SCOTCHLITE 5-368 BLUE DOT ON PAVEMENT TO INDICATE FIRE HYDRANT. YES ✓ NO 15) A COMMERCIAL HOOD SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE KITCHEN. 16) HOUR FIRE WALLS TO BE INSTALLED, DIVIDING THE BLDG. INTO SECTIONS OF MORE THAN SQ. FEET. YES NO I/ 17) IF A FULL MANSARD IS CONSTRUCTED, PROVIDE A LADDER TO ROOF DECK. YE5_114 NO 18) TRASH BINS MUST HAVE A DROP LID. YESL../ NO 19) STANDPIPES ON THE ROOF ARE REQUIRED. YES NO 20) INSTALL A WALK OR DRIVE-THRU WITH LOCK BOX. YES NO i/ 21) A SECOND EMERGENCY EXIT SHALL BE PROVIDED. YEE NO 22) "NO PARKING" SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: 23) POST "NOT A' THROUGH STREET" SIGN AT ENTRANCES. 24) MITIGATION FOR FIRE PROTECTION IMPACT. $577.00 PER DWELLING UNIT. APT. OR RESIDENCE. NEW INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL $0.34 PER SQUARE FEET. 2958 . .._6005 7 Z 25) THE FIRE LANE SHALL BE SIGNED IN ACCORDANCE CITY & STATE REGULATIONS. FIRE LANES SHALL BE DESIGNATED IN FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: NO F/QL� �INC21 6,1r "1 a F/ KE Aid°7 4✓/4( (Ir i qe L. , 4 )//Ji/t A' f - 4.A• F. S YES NO L- YES NO YES i/'rN0 YES NO ✓ 76) BUILDING ADDRESSES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND SHALL BE, OF CONTRAST- YES [.NO ING COLOR AND BACKGROUND. THEY SHALL BEi '° FOR COMME• lea AND 6" FOR SUITED IDENTIFICATION AND 6" FOR RESIDENTIAL. cr San iacinrc 01 Ls; °.San _..__. crro. Fire and Life Safety Department FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU CHECKLIST (CONT'D) 27) ILLUMINATED DIRECTORY - ALL CONDOMINIUMS, APARTMENT COMPLEXES, TOWN HOUSES AND MOBILEHOME PARKS SHALL INSTALL & MAINTAIN AT POINTS OF ENTRY ILLUMINATED DIRECTORIES. YES NO C:17v cf Sr tacinro .1.01 Ls .'.1atn. 414 4.1 40.84.01 MY. • sal... YrOWDO MN *Da V 40144.4 FM. V*16.1 VT! Ir. AY. 40111 1144...0.44•9 0.91/0414 lak=fl• OHM 1•14 gyms... NY woe, *Salo iv Ciewls• ap0 1, LID YANA a.* •••11 gise4.1 4'.../11.4,0e0111 4414 1.154.454 ( 9L AMI-1) alsrls 016:sem,V• n l*w0**1,09.* Np{*M}O W;* *P4W_,ll .04.1.111 • 210.0.•10..V.1,1 lAm - pap. MMm 4POwa wlac*cow.140 111 {i%HfEii!t i 9111' 11 I i l Num 111 lliill,313�# Pin ! I IJ 1�i 3! `Ililllli Ii' LEFT SIDE ELEVATION! RIGHT ELEVATION ...T aar® •a.T nWu. 0.1.L.WATED 0*144 ....0011.11100140. rr ury v u 4XTT*aW NAST.. -Mel 0 IPUNT u9H* jw*90 -*IOW TILE T6/tL- 0.<*rgOB1Epe IOvli T .I:.P. 1 * ia(`uu4n 0*1011..uw.Mle M11.a4.u. 1we*rM 11401.• .mm Wu* - PmM *wn ---. WA *mne.®e ROW RILIZ{L� Ta-4 CP,WeYIiW *KLL-PUNT awry an*ww ew*M -leml Mal* meal amen nv WO • I'ld, .�st.l!1I1 !I Ilil�1lEiEE{1i Is€Nisi add !FRONT ELEVATION! i . {:I. * 9 it fl!u it idllitll t REAR ELEVATION 11.....1141101. mZCT c,r u.ro vum AC. - 0081i M*14 6l „a �fue ..1111..111.2 a.G[mwv r. alewa 441.1* Twwn na* w Nun 1.1441.11.0.0.1 na1mPwrz* P.,*1 g sn AGENDA 7.1 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance Director via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager SUBJ: Community Facilities District Tax Administration DATE: October 5, 1993 RECOMMENDATION Receive and file. BACKGROUND As partof the 1993-94 budget review process, the City Council requested additional information regarding the administration of our Community Facilities Districts (CFD), the bid procedures and of work that the CFD administrator performs. The CFDs were originally formed in 1986 and 1987 and the enabling resolutions required special handling of the tax levy on each parcel. This includes auditing all building permits issued during the prior fiscal year, reviewing the tax formula, setting the annual tax rate, getting the information to the County of Riverside and throughout the year reviewing for delinquency tax payments and calculating assessment pay-offs. Previously, the City of San Jacinto had not had a formal agreement for these services. The firm of Muni Financial Services (MFS) was providing the service on a flat fee basis. In 1992, MFS CFD administration fees were $8,685 for CFD No. 1, $1,500 for AD 87-1, $1,000 for CFD No. 3 $10,000 for CFD No. 2 for a total of $21,185. Also, there were additional service charges for delinquency follow-up at a rate of $30.00 per parcel and pay-off calculations of $150.00 per request. The calculation charges were passed on to the requestor. In 1992, staff went out to bid for administrative services on our CFDs and AD 87-1. David Taussig & Associates, Inc. was the successful bidder, and on June 30, 1992 received the contract to serve as tax administrator for the CFDs and AD 87-1 in fiscal year 1992-93. The contract was awarded for an amount not to exceed $45,000 to administer all four districts with no additional charges. Page 2 David Taussig & Associates October 5, 1993 On April 6, 1993 the City Council authorized the Mayor to re- enter into an agreement with David Taussig and Associates for the 1993-94 fiscal year for an amount not to exceed $40,000. A copy of the scope of services is attached. The individual CFD charges are $9,000 each, for CFD No. 1 and 3, $7,000 for AD 87-1 and $15,000 for CFD No. 2. The 1993-94 budget was reduced by $5,000 since Phase I of last year's contract ("gear up" Project Review) was no longer necessary. In addition to the above required CFD administration, David Taussig and Associates is also assisting the City in our compliance with Senate Bill 1464, which made several revisions to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act. SB 1464 has resulted in new disclosure and annual information reporting requirements. Mr. Taussig and Mr. Mosenman of David Taussig and Associates, will be present at the meeting to answer any questions that you might have. 1992 - 1993 IV. SCOPE OF WO CITY OF SAN JACINTO CONSULTANT SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH THE COLLF,CTION OF SPECIAL TAXES FOR CO I FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1, NO. 2. NO. 3 TU} COLLECTION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 87-1 Consultant shall provide financial consulting services to assist the City of San Jacinto ("Client") in the levy of a special tax for Client's Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 1, No. 2, No. 3 and the collection of installment payments for Client's Assessment District No. 87-1. The intent of these services shall be to determine the special taxes and installment payments for each (..14D and Assessment District and to facilitate the collections of the special taxes and installment payments in that year by the County of Riverside. PHASE 1. PROJECT REVIEW This task involves a review of (i) the public infrastructure and/or services to be funded, (ii) phasing and land use characteristics and (iii) the proceedings, official statements and bond transcripts, as applicable for each CFD or Assessment District. In particular this task includes the following: Task 1. Identify capital improvements and public services to be funded by each special district. T Review of phasing and land uses by project and within project 657 builder or subarea. Task 3. Review master list of Assessor's Parcels for each district Enhance and/or automate such list to reflect all pertinent land use information (e.g., tract, lot, land square footage, building square footage, date of building permit, special tax or assessment classification, etc.). Task 4. Review special tax formula and method of assessment. Identify potential shortfall in revenues, if any, with respect to changes in original projected phasing and land uses. Task 5. Upon review of special tax or assessment apportionment methodology and existing and proposed phasing and land uses, develop or enhance financial model to accurately project current and future revenue needs. Gin' of San Jacinro Page 6 06/03/1992 1993 — 1994 EXHIBIT A MELLO-ROOS AND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS NO. 1, NO. 2 AND NO. 3, AND ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 87-1 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO SCOPE OF WORK Consultant shall provide financial consulting services to assist the City of San Jacinto ("Client") in the administration of Community Facilities District No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3 and Assessment District No. 87-1. The focus of these services shall be to determine the special tax rates and installment payments for each community facilities district and assessment district and to facilitate their collection in fiscal years 1993-94 and 1994-95 by the County of Riverside. The specific activities and tasks to be performed under this Scope of Work include the following: Task 1 Background Research This task involves determining, gathering and organizing the land use data required to apportion and collect special taxes and installment payments, and includes the following subtasks: 1.1 Subdivision Research: Identify and obtain copies of all new final tract or parcel maps. Determine acreage for each parcel. 1.2 Apportionment of Assessment: Prepare amended assessment roll for Assessment District No. 87-1 should any parcels be subdivided. 1.3 Development Research: Determine building permit activity as of June 30, 1993. Identify building permit issuance date, building square footage and situs address for each new home. Review current Assessor Parcel Maps to determine which parcel numbers will be valid for fiscal year 1993-94. 1.4 Database Management: Update automated parcel database to include all new parcels. Data items will include Assessor Parcel Number and corresponding tract, lot and unit number, land square footage, building square footage, building permit issuance date and situs address. Task 2 Classification of Property This task involves application of the Rate and Method of Apportionment of the Special Tax to determine the appropriate special tax classification for each parcel and includes the following subtasks: 03/04/1993 City of San Jacinto Exhibit A Page 2 2.1 Exempt Property: Identify all property owned by public agencies or entities otherwise exempt from the special tax and classify as exempt property. 2.2 Taxable Property: Identify all taxable properties and assign to the appropriate special tax classification. Task 3 Financial Analysis This task involves calculating the Special Tax and Installment Payment Requirement and includes the following subtasks: 3.1 Financial Statements: Review/audit financial statements for all funds and accounts. Piepare summary analysis of financial activity for all funds. 3.2 Administrative Expense Budget: Assist Client with the preparation of an administrative expense budget. 3.3 Arbitrage/Rebate Calculations: Coordinate between the Client and the fiscal agent regarding arbitrage/rebate calculations, the selection of an arbitrage/rebate consultant and other related matters as may be required. 3.4 Special Tax and Assessment Spread: Contact the fiscal agent to confirm interest and principal payments. Compute special tax rates for all classifications of taxable property according to the Rate and Method of Apportionment. Calculate installment payments for each parcel according to the Method of Assessment. Task 4 Report Preparation This task includes the preparation of an Annual Special Tax or Annual Special Assessment Report containing the findings of the financial analysis and an explanation of the methodology employed to apportion the special taxes and installment payments for each special district. Included in the report is a list of special taxes or installment payments by Assessor's Parcel which can be used as the exhibit to the resolution authorizing the levy and collection of special taxes or installment payments. Task 5 Submittal of Special Taxes to County of Riverside This task involves submitting the special tax or installment payment levy on or before August 10 or such other date specified by the County of Riverside to the Auditor -Controller for inclusion on the consolidated property tax bills. The special tax and installment levy will be submitted on magnetic tape or other media as specified by the County. 03/04/1993 City of San Jacinto Exhibit A Page 3 Task 6 Delinquent Property Owner Research This task involves the review and research of County records to determine which parcels are delinquent in the payment of special taxes or installment payments, and includes the following subtasks: 6.1 Static Delinquency Report: Review the tri-annual Paid/Unpaid Status Reports provided by the Riverside County Auditor -Controller to determine which parcels are delinquent and the corresponding amount of delinquent special taxes or installment payments. Prepare report listing owner and mailing address of all parcels delinquent in the payment of special taxes or installment payments. 6.2 Collection of Delinquent Special Taxes: Assist Client with the development of procedures to cure delinquent special taxes or installment payments. Assist with the preparation of demand letters and support documents necessary for foreclosure actions. Task 7 Roll Changes and Adjusted Property Tax Bills This task involves monitoring any changes to the secured tax roll which necessitate new or adjusted property tax bills. This task includes the calculation of new or adjusted bills and the preparation of requests to the County to prepare such bills. Task 8 Responses to Property Owner Questions This task involves the provision of information to property owners and other interested parties by telephone and/or in writing regarding the amount and calculation of the special tax and installment payments. Formal meetings with property owners or other interested parties shall be considered "Additional Work" as described in the Limitations section of the Fee Schedule. Task 9 Prepayment Calculations This tasks involves calculating the amount required to prepay the special tax or special assessment for any given parcel. Task 10 Compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 1464 This task involves assisting Client meet the new annual reporting and special tax disclosure requirements as specified by SB 1464, the 1992 Mello -Roos Amendment Bill, and includes the following subtasks: 9.1 Prepare and submit required data to the California Debt Advisory Commission each October in compliance with Section 53359.5 of the Government Code (as amended by SB 1464). 03/04/1993 City of San Jacinto Exhibit A Page 4 9.2 Assist client in the preparation of special tax disclosure documents pursuant to Section 1102.6b of the Civil Code and Section 53340.2 of the Government Code (as amended by SB 1464). Task 11 Meetings Consultant will schedule up to four formal meetings per year with Client including the following: • One meeting to review the spread of Mello -Roos special taxes or installment payments and the Annual Special Tax or Installment Payment Report, including a discussion of the findings of the financial analysis. • Council meeting at which the resolution authorizing the levy and collection of special taxes or installment payments is scheduled for adoption. j: proposaitadmin sanjae sanjac jj2.agr I 0304/1993 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and members of the City Council FROM: Anna Vega, Finance Director Via Pamela Easter, City Manger SUBJ: CFD NO. 2 ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX REVISION DATE: October 5, 1993 RECOMMENDATION Adopt resolution revising the annual special taxes for certain assessor's parcels in Community Facilities District No. 2 (CFD NO. 2) for fiscal year 1993-94. BACKGROUND On September 28, 1993 the City Council was asked to adopt said resolution which consisted of "Exhibit A". Unfortunately, additional information was presented to the City Council which caused confusion on the Exhibit which was to be approved. A letter from David Taussig regarding this is attached. On August 3, 1993 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2151, which established a budget approving costs of administration and establishing the special taxes to be levied on parcels within CFD No. 2. During the initial gathering of tax data, the County Assessor's records did not indicate the tax exempt status of undeveloped parcel no. 433-020-009-5, 433-020-037-0, 439- 018-014-4 and 439-018-015-5. Upon submission of CFD No. 2's resolution and tax levy information to the County Auditor -Controller, the above mentioned parcels had become non-taxable and were rejected by the County. This non-taxable undeveloped property has caused a reduction in the special taxes which were levied pursuant to Resolution No. 2151 and requires a revision in the tax to be levied from undeveloped parcels in order to have sufficient funds to cover the 1993-94 bond principal and interest payments. This action does not affect occupied homes or parcels which have had building permits issued. Page 2 CFD NO. 2 Annual Special Tax Revision Upon your approval of this resolution, revising the annual special tax, the Auditor - Controller of the County of Riverside will prepare 577 revised property tax bills for the undeveloped (vacant) parcels. The tax amount to be assessed on undeveloped parcels is still within the maximum established by CFD No. 2. The Property tax bills have not been mailed by the County Auditor -Controller and therefore this resolution and revised tax information is expected in the County Offices by this week. Taussig and Associates has indicated that they will contact each individual undeveloped land property owner, upon passage of this resolution (October 6, 1993), in order to explain the change in taxes levied. Taussig & Associates will be available at the meeting to answer any questions you may have. DAVID TAUSs3G Public FFnance. Urban Economics, PIam:Lib 1301 Dove Street, Suite 600 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tel (7(4) 752-1554 Fax (714) 752-4058 Date: September 30, 1993 To: Anna Vega From: David Taussig ©•T Subject: Revised Undeveloped Property Special Taxes for City of San Jacinto Community Facilities District No. 2 ("CFD No. 2") Attached for review and approval by the San Jacinto City Council is a Resolution to revise undeveloped property special taxes for CFD No. 2 and the corresponding exhibit listing each parcel and its revised special tax. The revisions are necessary due to information initially provided to us by the County Assessor which indicated that certain undeveloped properties are taxable, when in fact they are actually tax-exempt. The resulting decrease in the number of taxable undeveloped parcels has compelled us to increase the levies on the remaining taxable undeveloped parcels. Please note that none of the developed parcels in CFI) No. 2 are impacted by the change in these special tax levies. My staff and I sincerely wish to apologize for the confusion caused by the exhibit to the Resolution to revise special taxes which was presented to the City Council at their September 28 meeting. Included in our submittal to City staff were both the exhibit to the Resolution and a replacement exhibit to the Annual Special Tax Report for CFD No. 2. Unfortunately, both the exhibit to the Resolution and the replacement exhibit to the Annual Special Tax Report, which was not intended to be included as part of the exhibit forwarded to the Council, were copied together. The replacement exhibit to the Annual Special Tax Report included a list of both the developed and the undeveloped parcels, along with the revised levies for the undeveloped parcels. This was the reason that the exhibit presented to the Council included the developed parcels in the CFD. Unfortunately, this first problem was compounded by a clerical error which resulted in the Special Tax A and Special Tax B column headings in the replacement exhibit to the Annual Special Tax Report being transposed. While our firm's computer magnetic tape prepared for the County Tax Collector contained the correct column headings, and in fact no changes were to be made to the tax bills of any developed property, the printed information handed to the Council had the special taxes listed in the wrong column. This was certainly not conducive to the Council's making an informed decision on the special tax issue. Both of these errors are inexcusable and are not the manner in which David Taussig and Associates, Inc. normally conducts its business. We have been involved in hundreds of public districts since our firm was established in 1985. and we have never been involved in any sort of lawsuit or challenge related to errors and omissions in our work. Our perfect record in this area has enabled us to keep our Errors and Omissions premiums at the lowest possible levels. However, we recognize that this record does not excuse the inaccuracies in the exhibit submitted to the City Council last week. The City of San Jacinto is a valued client of our firm, and I can assure you that DTA intends to provide the City with high quality service and work product for any projects we undertake with you in the future. DT/bv j:\clientsisanjacto.cty\vega2.ltr RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAXES FOR CERTAIN ASSESSOR'S PARCELS IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 WHEREAS, the City Council of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body"), has initiated proceeding, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a community facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. Community Facilities District No. 2 shall hereinafter be referred to as "District" and, WHEREAS, the legislative body, previously adopted Resolution No. 2151 on August 3, 1993, which established a budget approving costs of administration and established the special taxes to be levied on assessor's parcels within the District and, WHEREAS, the Riverside County Assessor's records did not indicate the tax exempt status of certain parcels and duplicate parcels have caused a reduction in the special taxes which were levied pursuant to Resolution No. 2151 and that the legislative body should accordingly revise the special taxes for certain parcels (the Parcels) and, WHEREAS, the legislative body desires at this time to approve the revision to the special taxes for the Parcels as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto for the next fiscal year (1993/94). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Pursuant to Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, the special taxes for the Parcels are hereby revised in the amounts set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto, with the amount of special taxes previously levied on all other property within the District pursuant to Resolution No. 2151 being sufficient to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year (1993/94) for the referenced District. SECTION 3. The Auditor -Controller of the County of Riverside is hereby directed to prepare revised property tax bills for the Parcels and enter in the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land affected, in a space marked "public improvement, special tax" or by any other suitable designation, the revised installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and amount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Exhibit "A". MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 5th day of October, 1993 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Henry Hafliger, Mayor A 1 1 EST: Richard Brewer, City Clerk Deputy City Clerk EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISED FY 1993-94 SPECIAL TAXES FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 BOOK PAGE PARCEL TRACT TOTAL SPECIAL TAX SPECIAL TAX A SPECIAL TAX B 437 310 29 23671 $91,401.44 S91,401.44 $0.00 433 341 1 23789 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 341 2 23789 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 341 3 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 4 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 5 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 6 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 7 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 8 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 9 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 10 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 11 23789 $760,63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 12 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 13 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 14 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 15 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 16 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 17 23789 $977.96 $977.96 $0.00 433 341 18 23789 $977.96 $977.96 $0.00 433 341 19 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 20 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 21 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 22 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 23 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 24 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 25 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 26 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 27 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 28 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 29 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 30 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 31 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 32 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 33 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 34 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 341 35 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 342 1 23789 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 PAGE 1 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISED FY 1993-94 SPECIAL TAXES FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 BOOK PAGE PARCEL TRACT TOTAL SPECIAL TAX SPECIAL TAX A SPECIAL TAX B 433 342 2 23789 S814.97 S814.97 $0.00 433 342 3 23789 $1,086.62 $1,086.62 $0,00 433 342 4 23789 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 433 342 5 23789 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 342 6 23789 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 342 7 23789 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 433 342 8 23789 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 433 342 9 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 342 10 23789 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 433 342 11 23789 S814.97 $814.97 $0.00 433 342 12 23789 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 433 342 13 23789 S760.63 S760.63 $0.00 433 342 14 23789 $869.30 S869.30 $0.00 433 342 15 23789 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 342 16 23789 3923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 342 17 23789 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 342 18 23789 S814.97 $814.97 $0.00 433 342 19 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 342 20 23789 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 433 342 21 23789 $814.97 $814.97 S0.00 433 342 22 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 342 23 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 342 24 23789 S977.96 $977.96 $0.00 433 342 25 23789 $1,086.62 S1,086.62 $0.00 433 342 26 23789 5977.96 $977.96 $0.00 433 342 27 23789 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 433 342 28 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 342 29 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 342 30 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 342 31 23789 $1,086.62 $1,086.62 $0.00 433 342 32 23789 $1,358.28 $1,358.28 $0.00 433 342 33 23789 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 342 34 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 342 35 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 342 36 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 342 37 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 342 38 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 PAGE 2 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO, 2 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISED FY 1993-94 SPECIAL TAXES FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 BOOK PAGE PARCEL TRACT TOTAL SPECIAL TAX SPECIAL TAX A SPECIAL TAX B 433 342 39 23789 $760.63 $760,63 $0.00 433 342 40 23789 $760.63 $760,63 $0.00 433 343 1 23789 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 433 343 2 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 343 3 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 343 4 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 343 5 23789 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 433 343 6 23789 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 343 7 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 343 8 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 343 9 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 343 10 23789 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 351 1 23789 $977.96 $977.96 $0.00 433 351 2 23789 5760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 351 3 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 351 4 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 351 5 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 351 6 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 351 7 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 351 8 23789 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 433 351 9 23789 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 433 351 10 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 351 11 23789 5814.97 $814.97 $0.00 433 351 12 23789 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 433 351 13 23789 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 433 351 14 23789 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 433 351 15 23789 $706.30 $706.30 $0.00 433 351 16 23789 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 351 17 23789 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 351 18 23789 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 351 21 23789 $1,032.29 $1,032.29 $0.00 433 352 1 23789 $977.96 S977.96 $0.00 433 352 2 23789 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 352 3 23789 $977.96 $977.96 $0.00 433 352 4 23789 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 433 352 5 23789 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 352 6 23789 $1,249.61 51,249.61 $0.00 PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISED FY 1993-94 SPECIAL TAXES FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 BOOK PAGE PARCEL TRACT TOTAL SPECIAL TAX SPECIAL TAX A SPECIAL TAX B 433 352 7 23789 $1,086.62 $1,086.62 $0.00 433 352 8 23789 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 352 9 23789 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 361 1 23790 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 361 2 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 361 3 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 361 4 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 361 5 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 361 6 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 361 7 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 361 8 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 361 9 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 361 10 23790 $977.96 $977.96 $0.00 433 361 11 23790 $1,032.29 $1,032.29 $0.00 433 361 12 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 361 13 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 361 14 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 361 15 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 361 16 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 361 17 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 361 18 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 361 19 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 361 20 23790 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 362 1 23790 $1,086.62 $1,086.62 $0.00 433 362 2 23790 $1,086.62 $1,086.62 S0.00 433 362 3 23790 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 362 4 23790 $1,032.29 $1,032.29 $0.00 433 362 5 23790 $1,086.62 $1,086.62 $0.00 433 362 6 23790 $1,195.28 $1,195.28 $0.00 433 362 7 23790 $1,032.29 $1,032.29 $0.00 433 362 8 23790 $977.96 $977.96 $0.00 433 362 9 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 362 10 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 362 11 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 362 12 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 362 13 23790 $1,032.29 $1,032.29 $0.00 433 362 14 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 PAGE 4 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISED FY 1993-94 SPECIAL TAXES FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 BOOK PAGE PARCEL TRACT TOTAL SPECIAL TAX SPECIAL TAX A SPECIAL TAX B 433 362 15 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 362 16 23790 S923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 362 17 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 362 18 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 362 19 23790 $1,086.62 $1,086.62 $0.00 433 362 20 23790 $1,032.29 $1,032.29 $0.00 433 362 21 23790 $1,521.27 $1,521.27 $0.00 433 362 22 23790 S1,086.62 $1,086.62 $0.00 433 362 23 23790 S1,412.61 $1,412.61 $0.00 433 362 24 23790 $1,140.95 S1,140.95 $0.00 433 362 25 23790 S1,303.94 $1 7303.94 $0.00 433 362 26 23790 $977.96 $977.96 $0.00 433 362 27 23790 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 362 28 23790 $923.63 $923.53 $0.00 433 362 29 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 362 30 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 362 31 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 362 32 23790 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 362 33 23790 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 362 34 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 362 35 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 362 36 23790 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 362 37 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 362 38 23790 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 362 39 23790 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 362 40 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 362 41 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 362 42 23790 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 362 43 23790 $923.63 S923.63 $0.00 433 362 44 23790 $977.96 S977.96 $0.00 433 362 45 23790 S923.63 S923.63 $0.00 433 362 46 23790 $869.30 S869.30 $0.00 433 362 47 23790 $1,032.29 S1,032.29 $0.00 433 371 15 23791 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 371 16 23791 S869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 371 17 23791 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 371 18 23791 $977.96 $977.96 $0.00 PAGE 5 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISED FY 1993-94 SPECIAL TAXES FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 BOOK PAGE PARCEL TRACT TOTAL SPECIAL TAX SPECIAL TAX A SPECIAL TAX B 433 371 19 23791 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 371 20 23791 $923.63 $923,63 $0.00 433 371 21 23791 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 371 22 23791 $1,032.29 $1,032.29 $0.00 433 371 23 23791 $1,032.29 $1,032.29 $0.00 433 371 24 23791 $1,249.61 $1,249.61 $0.00 433 371 25 23791 $1,032.29 $1,032.29 $0.00 433 371 26 23791 $977.96 $977.96 $0.00 433 371 27 23791 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 371 28 23791 $1,032.29 $1,032.29 $0.00 433 371 29 23791 $1,086.62 $1,086.62 $0.00 433 371 30 23791 $1,195.28 $1,195.28 $0.00 433 371 31 23791 $1,086.62 $1,086.62 $0.00 433 371 32 23791 $1,521.27 $1,521.27 $0.00 433 371 33 23791 $1,032.29 $1,032.29 $0.00 433 371 34 23791 $1,358.28 $1,358.28 $0.00 433 371 35 23791 $869.30 $869.30 S0.00 433 371 36 23791 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 371 37 23791 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 371 38 23791 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 371 39 23791 $977.96 $977.96 $0.00 433 371 40 23791 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 371 41 23791 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 371 42 23791 $1,032.29 $1,032.29 $0.00 433 371 43 23791 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 371 44 23791 $977.96 $977.96 $0.00 433 371 45 23791 $1,140.95 $1,140.95 $0.00 433 371 46 23791 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 372 1 23791 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 372 2 23791 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 433 372 3 23791 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 372 4 23791 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 372 5 23791 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 372 6 23791 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 433 372 7 23791 $977.96 $977.96 $0.00 433 372 8 23791 $1,140.95 $1,140.95 $0.00 433 373 4 23791 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 PAGE 6 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISED FY 1993-94 SPECIAL TAXES FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 BOOK PAGE PARCEL TRACT TOTAL SPECIAL TAX SPECIAL TAX A SPECIAL TAX B 433 373 5 23791 $869.30 S869.30 $0.00 433 373 6 23791 $977,96 $977.96 $0.00 439 180 15 23963-1 $74,036.42 $74,036.42 $0.00 438 40 8 23963 $54,548.32 $54,548.32 $0.00 438 40 9 23963 $28,252.12 $28,252.12 $0.00 438 50 51 23963 $95,296.57 $95,296.57 $0.00 438 50 52 23963 $52,809.73 $52,809.73 $0.00 438 50 54 23963 $126,319.58 S126,319.58 $0.00 438 50 55 23963 $83,289.42 $83,289.42 $0.00 438 50 56 23963 $103,935.20 $103,935.20 $0.00 438 50 57 23963 $102,468.27 $102,468.27 $0.00 438 50 65 23963 $8.366.97 $8,366.97 $0.00 439 190 27 23963 $66,175.16 $66,175.16 $0.00 439 190 28 23963 $60,959.38 $60,959.38 $0.00 439 190 29 23963 $24,231.63 $24,231.63 $0.00 439 190 30 23963 $16,244.97 $16,244.97 $0.00 439 301 8 24047 -1 $380.32 $380.32 $0.00 439 301 9 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 301 10 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 301 11 24047-1 5488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 301 12 24047 - 1 S488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 301 13 24047 -1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 301 14 24047-1 8488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 301 15 24047 - 1 8488,98 $488.98 $0.00 439 301 16 24047 -1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 301 17 24047-1 S488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 301 18 24047 -1 $488.98 S488.98 $0.00 439 301 19 24047 -1 $543.31. $543.31 $0.00 439 301 20 24047-1 8543.31 8543.31 $0.00 439 301 21 24047 - 1 $543.31 $543.31 $0.00 439 301 22 24047 -1 $488.98 6488.98 $0.00 439 301 23 24047-1 $434.65 S434.65 $0.00 439 301 24 24047 - 1 $543.31 $543.31 $0.00 439 301 25 24047-1 $434.65 $434.65 $0.00 439 301 26 24047-1 $434.65 $434.65 $0.00 439 301 27 24047 -1 8434.65 $434.65 $0.00 439 301 28 24047-1 $706.30 $706.30 $0.00 PAGE 7 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISED FY 1993-94 SPECIAL TAXES FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY FY BOOK PAGE PARCEL TRACT TOTAL 1993-94 FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 SPECIAL TAX SPECIAL TAX A SPECIAL TAX B 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 301 439 302 439 302 439 302 439 302 439 302 439 302 439 302 439 302 439 302 439 302 439 302 439 302 439 302 439 302 439 302 29 24047-1 30 24047-1 31 24047-1 32 24047-1 33 24047-1 34 24047-1 35 24047-1 36 24047-1 37 24047-1 38 24047-1 39 24047 -1 40 24047-1 41 24047-1 42 24047-1 43 24047-1 44 24047-1 45 24047-1 46 24047- 1 47 24047 -1 48 24047 -1 49 24047 -1 50 24047 -1 1 24047 -1 2 24047-1 3 24047-1 4 24047 -1 5 24047 -1 6 24047-1 7 24047-1 8 24047-1 9 24047-1 10 24047-1 11 24047-1 12 24047-1 13 24047-1 14 24047-1 15 24047-1 PAGE 8 $543.31 $434.65 $434.65 $434.65 $488.98 $488.98 $380.32 $488.98 $434.65 $488.98 $434.65 $488.98 $488.98 $488.98 $488.98 $380.32 $434.65 $488.98 $488.98 3488.98 $488.98 $380.32 5434.65 $488.98 $488.98 $488.98 $488.98 $488.98 $543.31 $488.98 $543.31 $869.30 $814.97 $814.97 $760.63 $706.30 $543.31 $543.31 $434.65 $434.65 $434.65 $488.98 $488.98 $380.32 $488.98 $434.65 $488.98 $434.65 S488.98 $488.98 S488.98 $488.98 $380.32 $434.65 $488.98 $488.98 $488.98 S488.98 S380.32 S434.65 $488.98 $488.98 $488.98 $488.98 $488.98 $543.31 $488.98 $543.31 $869.30 $814.97 $814.97 $760.63 $706.30 $543.31 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISED FY 1993-94 SPECIAL TAXES FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 BOOK PAGE PARCEL TRACT TOTAL SPECIAL TAX SPECIAL TAX A SPECIAL TAX B 439 302 16 24047-1 $597.64 $597.64 $0.00 439 302 17 24047-1 $543.31 $543.31 $0.00 439 303 1 24047-1 $543.31 $543.31 $0.00 439 303 2 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 3 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 4 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 5 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 6 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 7 24047-1 $434.65 $434.65 $0.00 439 303 8 24047-1 $543.31 $543.31 $0.00 439 303 9 24047-1 $543.31 $543.31 $0.00 439 303 10 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 11 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 12 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 13 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 14 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 15 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 16 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 20 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 21 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 22 24047- 1 $488.98 S488.98 $0.00 439 303 23 24047-1 $488.98 S488.98 $0.00 439 303 24 24047-1 $543.31 S543.31 $0.00 439 303 25 24047-1 $543.31 $543.31 $0.00 439 303 26 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 27 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 28 24047-1 $434.65 $434.65 $0.00 439 303 29 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 30 24047-1 $434.65 $434.65 $0.00 439 303 31 24047-1 $434.65 $434.65 $0.00 439 303 32 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 33 24047-1 $597.64 $597.64 $0.00 439 303 34 24047-1 S434.65 $434.65 $0.00 439 303 35 24047-1 $543.31 $543.31 $0.00 439 303 36 24047-1 $543.31 $543.31 $0.00 439 303 37 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 38 24047-1 S488.98 $488.98 $0.00 PAGE 9 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISED FY 1993-94 SPECIAL TAXES FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 BOOK PAGE PARCEL TRACT TOTAL SPECIAL TAX SPECIAL TAX A SPECIAL TAX B 439 303 39 24047-1 $488.98 S488.98 S0.00 439 303 40 24047-1 $651.97 $651.97 $0.00 439 303 41 24047-1 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 439 303 42 24047-1 $434.65 S434.65 $0.00 439 303 43 24047-1 $434.65 $434.65 $0.00 439 303 44 24047-1 $434.65 $434.65 $0.00 439 303 64 24047-1 $651.97 $651.97 $0.00 439 303 65 24047-1 $543.31 $543.31 $0.00 439 303 66 24047-1 $543.31 $543.31 $0.00 439 303 68 24047-1 $651.97 $651.97 $0.00 439 303 70 24047-1 $597.64 $597.64 $0.00 439 303 71 24047- 1 $543.31 $543.31 $0.00 439 303 72 24047-1 $543.31 $543.31 $0.00 439 303 73 24047-1 $543.31 $543.31 $0.00 439 303 77 24047-1 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 439 303 78 24047-1 $597.64 $597.64 $0.00 439 303 79 24047-1 $597.64 $597.64 $0.00 439 303 80 24047-1 $597.64 $597.64 $0.00 439 303 81 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 82 24047-1 $597.64 $597.64 $0.00 439 303 83 24047-1 $488.98 $488.98 $0.00 439 303 84 24047-1 $543.31 S543.31 $0.00 438 411 1 24048 $706.30 $706.30 $0.00 438 411 2 24048 S706.30 $706.30 $0.00 438 411 3 24048 $706.30 $706.30 $0.00 438 411 5 24048 S869.30 $869.30 $0.00 438 411 6 24048 $760.63 $760.63 S0.00 438 411 7 24048 $1,140.95 $1,140.95 S0.00 438 411 8 24048 S814.97 $814.97 S0.00 438 411 9 24048 S814.97 $814.97 $0.00 438 411 10 24048 S760.63 S760.63 $0.00 438 411 11 24048 $760.63 S760.63 $0.00 438 411 12 24048 S760.63 S760.63 $0.00 438 411 13 24048 S760.63 5760.63 $0.00 438 411 14 24048 $760.63 S760.63 $0.00 438 411 15 24048 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 438 411 16 24048 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 PAGE 10 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISED FY 1993-94 SPECIAL TAXES FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 BOOK PAGE PARCEL TRACT TOTAL SPECIAL TAX SPECIAL TAX A SPECIAL TAX B 438 411 17 24048 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 438 411 18 24048 $814,97 $814.97 $0.00 438 411 19 24048 $923.63 $923.63 $0.00 438 411 20 24048 $1,032.29 $1,032.29 $0.00 438 413 1 24048 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 438 413 2 24048 $706.30 $706.30 $0.00 438 441 15 24052 $875.96 $875.96 $0.00 438 441 16 24052 $987.71 $987.71 $0.00 438 441 17 24052 $763.95 $763.95 $0.00 438 441 18 24052 $799.00 $799.00 $0.00 438 441 19 24052 $1,153.60 $1,153.60 $0.00 438 441 20 24052 $843.53 $843.53 $0.00 438 441 21 24052 $813.72 $813.72 $0.00 438 441 22 24052 $843.53 $843.53 $0.00 438 441 23 24052 $831.68 $831.68 $0.00 438 441 24 24052 $880.45 $880.45 $0.00 438 441 25 24052 $810.72 $810.72 $0.00 438 441 26 24052 $1,010.04 $1,010.04 $0.00 438 441 27 24052 $1,087.62 $1,087.62 $0.00 438 441 28 24052 $953.54 $953.54 $0.00 438 441 29 24052 $775.68 $775.68 $0.00 438 441 30 24052 $884.06 $884.06 $0.00 438 441 31 24052 $1,078.39 $1,078.39 $0.00 438 441 32 24052 $952,41 $952.41 $0.00 438 441 33 24052 $810.72 $810.72 $0.00 438 441 34 24052 $873.09 $873.09 $0.00 438 441 35 24052 $810.72 $810.72 $0.00 438 441 36 24052 $873.09 $873.09 $0.00 438 441 37 24052 $778.92 $778.92 $0.00 438 441 38 24052 $778.92 $778.92 $0.00 438 441 39 24052 $875.58 S875.58 $0.00 438 441 40 24052 $757.22 $757.22 $0.00 438 441 41 24052 $825.69 $825.69 $0.00 438 441 42 24052 $784.66 S784.66 $0.00 438 441 43 24052 $758.34 $758,34 $0.00 438 441 44 24052 $754.35 5754.35 $0.00 438 441 45 24052 $774.05 S774.05 $0.00 PAGE 11 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISED FY 1993-94 SPECIAL TAXES FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 BOOK PAGE PARCEL TRACT TOTAL SPECIAL TAX SPECIAL TAX A SPECIAL TAX B 438 441 49 24052 $761.21 $0.00 438 441 50 24052 S753.23 $753.23 $0.00 438 441 51 24052 $754.97 $754.97 $0.00 438 441 52 24052 $865.98 $865.98 $0.00 438 441 53 24052 S920.36 $920.36 $0.00 438 441 54 24052 $889.18 S889.18 $0.00 438 441 55 24052 $782.04 S782.04 $0.00 438 441 56 24052 $875.46 S875.46 $0.00 438 441 57 24052 $875.58 S875.58 $0.00 438 441 58 24052 S748.36 $748.36 $0.00 438 441 59 24052 $748,36 $748.36 $0.00 438 441 60 24052 $830.06 $830.06 $0.00 438 441 61 24052 $862.24 S862.24 $0.00 438 441 62 24052 $759.46 $759.46 $0.00 438 441 63 24052 $760.46 S760.46 $0.00 438 441 64 24052 $841.53 $841.53 $0.00 438 441 65 24052 S792.89 S792.89 $0.00 438 441 66 24052 $912.25 $912.25 $0.00 438 441 67 24052 $754.47 $754.47 $0.00 438 441 68 24052 $760.96 $760.96 $0.00 438 441 69 24052 $809.10 $809.10 $0.00 438 441 70 24052 $801.00 $801.00 $0.00 438 441 71 24052 $777.92 $777.92 $0.00 438 441 72 24052 $760.83 $760.83 $0.00 438 441 73 24052 $754.60 $754.60 $0.00 438 441 74 24052 $875.46 $875.46 $0.00 438 441 75 24052 $880.32 $880.32 $0.00 438 441 76 24052 $754.60 $754.60 $0.00 438 441 77 24052 $760.83 $760.83 $0.00 438 441 78 24052 $769.56 $769.56 $0.00 438 441 79 24052 $789.52 $789.52 $0.00 438 441 80 24052 $819.08 $819.08 $0.00 438 441 81 24052 $796.38 $796.38 $0.00 438 441 82 24052 $853.01 $853.01 $0.00 438 441 83 24052 $879.32 $879.32 $0.00 438 442 1 24052 $905.27 $905.27 $0.00 438 442 2 24052 $773.31 $773.31 $0.00 PAGE 12 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISED FY 1993-94 SPECIAL TAXES FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 BOOK PAGE PARCEL TRACT TOTAL SPECIAL TAX SPECIAL TAX A SPECIAL TAX B 438 442 3 24052 $773.31 $773.31 $0.00 438 442 4 24052 $773.31 $773.31 $0.00 438 442 5 24052 $773.31 $773.31 $0.00 438 442 6 24052 $773.31 $773.31 $0.00 438 442 7 24052 $773.31 $773.31 $0.00 438 442 8 24052 $773.31 $773.31 S0.00 438 442 9 24052 $773.31 $773.31 $0.00 438 442 10 24052 $773.31 $773.31 $0.00 438 442 11 24052 $773.31 $773.31 S0.00 438 442 12 24052 $773.31 $773.31 $0.00 438 442 13 24052 $773.31 $773.31 $0.00 438 442 14 24052 $773.31 $773.31 $0.00 438 442 15 24052 $773.31 $773.31 $0.00 438 442 16 24052 $773.31 $773.31 $0.00 438 442 17 24052 $900.40 $900.40 $0.00 438 442 34 24052 $909.88 $909.88 $0.00 438 461 9 24054 $896.46 $896.46 $0.00 438 461 10 24054 $766.07 $766.07 $0.00 438 461 11 24054 $793.23 $793.23 $0.00 438 461 12 24054 $793.23 $793.23 $0.00 438 461 13 24054 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 438 461 14 24054 $766.07 $766.07 $0.00 438 461 15 24054 $755.20 $755.20 $0.00 438 461 16 24054 $760.63 5760.63 $0.00 438 461 17 24054 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 438 461 18 24054 $1,124.65 $1,124.65 $0.00 438 461 19 24054 $1,010.56 $1,010.56 $0.00 438 461 20 24054 $782.37 $782.37 $0.00 438 462 1 24054 $939.93 $939.93 $0.00 438 462 2 24054 $956.23 $956.23 $0.00 438 462 3 24054 $1,005.12 $1,005,12 $0.00 438 462 4 24054 $1,162.68 $1,162.68 $0.00 438 462 5 24054 $1,293.08 $1,293.08 $0.00 438 462 6 24054 $1,559.30 $1,559.30 $0.00 438 462 7 24054 5923.63 $923.63 $0.00 438 462 8 24054 $1,005.12 S1,005.12 $0.00 438 462 9 24054 $1,184.42 $1,184.42 $0.00 PAGE 13 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISED FY 1993-94 SPECIAL TAXES FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 BOOK PAGE PARCEL TRACT TOTAL SPECIAL TAX SPECIAL TAX A SPECIAL TAX B 438 462 10 24054 $863.86 $863.86 $0.00 438 462 11 24054 $771.50 $771.50 $0.00 438 462 12 24054 $782.37 S782.37 $0.00 438 462 13 24054 $809.53 $809.53 $0.00 438 462 14 24054 $874.73 $874.73 $0.00 438 462 15 24054 $874.73 $874.73 $0.00 438 462 16 24054 $977.96 $977.96 $0.00 438 462 17 24054 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 438 463 1 24054 $939.93 $939.93 $0.00 438 463 2 24054 $1,059.45 $1,059.45 $0.00 438 463 3 24054 $1,005.12 $1,005.12 $0.00 438 463 4 24054 $1,217.01 $1.217.01 $0.00 438 463 5 24054 $967.09 $967.09 $0.00 438 463 6 24054 $939.93 $939.93 $0.00 438 463 7 24054 $967.09 $967.09 $0.00 438 463 8 24054 $994.26 $994.26 $0.00 438 463 9 24054 $988.82 $988.82 $0.00 438 463 10 24054 5755.20 $755.20 $0.00 438 463 11 24054 $874.73 $874.73 $0.00 438 463 12 24054 $907.33 $907.33 $0.00 438 463 13 24054 $1,043.16 $1,043.16 $0,00 438 463 14 24054 $814.97 $814.97 S0.00 438 463 15 24054 $755.20 $755.20 $0.00 438 463 16 24054 $749.77 $749.77 $0,00 438 463 17 24054 $749.77 $749.77 $0.00 438 463 18 24054 $1,037.72 $1,037.72 $0.00 438 463 19 24054 $869.30 $869.30 $0.00 438 463 20 24054 $749.77 $749.77 $0.00 438 463 21 24054 $755.20 $755.20 $0.00 438 463 22 24054 $755.20 $755.20 $0.00 438 463 23 24054 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 438 463 24 24054 $945.36 $945.36 $0.00 438 463 25 24054 $1,015.99 $1,015.99 $0.00 438 463 26 24054 $1,287.64 $1,287.64 $0.00 438 463 27 24054 $1,309.38 $1,309.38 $0.00 438 463 28 24054 S858.43 $858.43 $0.00 438 463 29 24054 S814.97 $814.97 $0.00 PAGE 14 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISED FY 1993-94 SPECIAL TAXES FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 BOOK PAGE PARCEL TRACT TOTAL SPECIAL TAX SPECIAL TAX A SPECIAL TAX B 438 463 30 24054 $766.07 S766.07 $0.00 438 471 1 24054 $804.10 $804,10 $0.00 438 471 2 24054 $793.23 $793.23 $0.00 438 471 3 24054 $923.63 S923.63 $0.00 438 471 4 24054 $782.37 S782.37 $0.00 438 471 5 24054 $776.93 $776.93 $0.00 438 471 6 24054 $776.93 $776.93 $0.00 438 471 7 24054 $776.93 $776.93 $0.00 438 471 8 24054 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 438 471 9 24054 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 438 471 10 24054 $793.23 $793.23 $0.00 438 471 11 24054 $967.09 $967.09 $0.00 438 471 12 24054 $825.83 $825.83 $0.00 438 471 13 24054 $749.77 $749.77 $0.00 438 471 14 24054 $782.37 $782.37 $0.00 438 471 15 24054 $825.83 $825.83 $0.00 438 471 16 24054 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 438 471 17 24054 $804.10 $804.10 $0.00 438 471 18 24054 $793.23 $793.23 $0.00 438 471 19 24054 $755.20 $755.20 $0.00 438 471 20 24054 $945.36 $945.36 $0.00 438 471 21 24054 $939.93 $939.93 $0.00 438 471 22 24054 $755.20 $755.20 S0.00 438 471 23 24054 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 438 471 24 24054 $793.23 $793.23 $0.00 438 471 25 24054 $804.10 $804.10 $0.00 438 471 26 24054 $804.10 $804.10 $0.00 438 471 27 24054 $804.10 $804.10 $0.00 438 471 28 24054 $804.10 $804.10 $0.00 438 471 32 24054 $809.53 $809.53 $0.00 438 472 1 24054 $749.77 S749.77 $0.00 438 472 2 24054 S793.23 $793.23 $0.00 438 472 3 24054 S858,43 $858.43 $0.00 438 472 4 24054 S907.33 $907.33 $0.00 438 472 5 24054 $896.46 $896.46 $0.00 438 472 6 24054 $760.63 $760.63 $0.00 438 472 7 24054 $91276 $912 76 $0.00 PAGE 15 EXHIBIT A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO REVISED FY 1993-94 SPECIAL TAXES FOR UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 FY 1993-94 BOOK PAGE PARCEL TRACT TOTAL SPECIAL TAX SPECIAL TAX A SPECIAL TAX B 438 472 8 24054 $950.79 $950.79 $0.00 438 472 9 24054 $891.03 $891.03 $0.00 438 472 10 24054 $814.97 $814.97 $0.00 438 472 11 24054 $749.77 $749.77 $0.00 438 472 12 24054 $771.50 $771,50 $0.00 438 472 13 24054 $755.20 $755,20 $0.00 438 472 14 24054 $749.77 S749.77 $0.00 438 473 1 24054 $1,097.49 S1,097.49 $0.00 438 473 2 24054 $912.76 S912.76 $0.00 438 473 3 24054 $934.49 S934.49 $0.00 438 473 4 24054 $896.46 $896.46 $0.00 438 473 5 24054 S793.23 $793.23 $0.00 438 473 6 24054 $853.00 $853.00 $0.00 438 473 7 24054 $1,086.62 $1,086.62 $0.00 438 30 12 UNDEV $50,093.18 $50,093.18 $0.00 438 40 6 UNDEV $26,078.88 $26,078.88 $0.00 438 40 7 UNDEV $62,438.84 $62,438.84 $0.00 438 50 20 UNDEV $95,296.57 $95,296.57 $0.00 PAGE 16 AGENDA 7. CITY OF SAN JACINTO Staff Report TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager FROM: Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief/Building Official (LA, DATE: August 3, 1993 SUBJECT: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Update RECOMMENDATION: Receive an update from Staff concerning the City's efforts regarding the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). BACKGROUND: Attached is an informative article from the August 1993 issue of American City and County entitled "One Year and Counting." It gives a very good overview of ADA and its first year of existence. Over the past several months Staff has accomplished the following as it relates to ADA: 1. Met several times with the representatives of the Handicapped Law Compliance Office (Twayne and Barbara Stevens). City Attorney Jim Cox also participated in some of these discussions. 2. Inspected properties which were identified as possibly having ADA. problems. Representatives from building, fire and the Handicapped Law Compliance Office were involved in these inspections. Most notable was an inspection of the Anid Club. The City's facilities were also inspected. 3. Staff has attended some training concerning ADA, both as it relates to personnel and accessibility issues. Unfortunately, Doug Shipman was the City's ADA representative and is no longer employed with the City. 4. Dave Anderson has attended some joint public meetings with the City of Hemet on ADA planning. The City of Hemet is facing the same issues as San Jacinto. Much input and information have been received from these meetings. 5. We are checking references of some possible ADA consultants. The possibility of hiring an ADA specialist was discussed during the budgetary sessions. This person would help the City focus on immediate needs and also develop short- and long-range mitigation plans to completely implement ADA and other California accessibility codes. A recommendation to the City Manager will be made within the next two weeks. 1 Special Report One Year and Counting On the first birthday of the Americans with Disabilities Act compliance deadline, cities and counties are still trying to figure out their responsibilities and requirements. By Sharon Grove In late April 1992, a police officer in Clearwater, Fla. responded to what appeared to be a typical in I I concerning a domestic squabble. Instead the incident brought national attention to this city of 98,000-plus residents by providing a precedent - setting test case on how local governments im- plement the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). The Clearwater officer arrived on the `. scene that April day to find a group of in- dividuals with hearing disabilities, says Robert Surette, assistant city attorney for Clearwater and police legal advisor. "The of- ficer communicated with a pad and paper," J Surette continues, and one man was placed under arrest and jailed overnight. Subsequently the man filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Justice, alleging that he had been discriminated against, citing ADA and claiming that he had asked both city and coun- ty authorities for an interpreter but was refused. The complaint prompted a Justice Department in- vestigation and recently resulted in a first of its kind policy for the Clearwater Police Department re- garding incidents involving persons with hearing impairments. That new policy, created by Surette when he could find nothing already established, will likely become the model for most local law enforcement agencies in the nation as part of the ongoing efforts of local government to comply with ADA. Mixed Emotions Setting precedents and breaking new ground have become commonplace events as cities and counties continue in their efforts to find methods to ef- fectively implement ADA, now just past the one-year mark for the local government compliance date of Jan- uary 1992. On July 26, 1990 when President Bush signed ADA into law the com- pliance clock started to tick. Public and private entities were given a series of deadlines to adapt phys- ical structures and adopt pro- grams and procedures that would as- sist the nation's more than 43 million persons with disabilities. In concept. ADA drew praise from virtually everyone. Yet many city and county officials were concerned about the bottom line effects compliance would have on their jurisdictions. Making curb cuts, enlarging door- ways and restrooms, and installing el- evators were only parts of the package. Other requirements might entail a wholesale reworking of personnel poli- cies and programs. Accommodations for employees with disabilities — cur- rent and future — would have to be put in place. The provision of aids to enable those with hearing or visual im- pairments to access both emergency and routine public services, such as transit, would also have to be added to the checklists and the price tags. "Anything we can do I would do,' stressed one county -level official. "But we just can't spend a lot of money." Like him, many officials wondered what toll compliance would take on budgets already stretched too thin. Others, with limited staffs and inter- nal resources, felt uncertain about how to perform the necessary self -evalua- tions, much less determine affordable resolutions of problems. Many worried that even if their attempts at compli- ance seemed successful, their commu- nities would still be vulnerable to yet a new series of risks from complaints or even lawsuits filed by those who argue "It's not enough." And what of enforce- ment? Who would enforce ADA among local governments? Would another snarl of federal bureaucracy intrude on and complicate the lives of local offi- cials? For state and local governments the deadlines for compliance or a plan for compliance with ADA regarding em- ployment, facilities, programs and some transportation services have come and gone. Not all local govern- ments have met the deadlines but offi- cials and observers of public service still rate the progress of ADA imple- mentation favorably. In April, the National Council on Disability, an independent federal agency charged with recommending and guiding policy regarding disability rights, issued ADA Watch —Year One: A Report to the President and the Con- gress on Progress in Implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act, which evaluated the progress of ADA throughout the nation. Its first conclu- sion was that the early record on vol- untary compliance with the ADA is mixed. Some covered entities have of- fered exemplary models for accommo- dating the needs of people with dis- abilities while many have done what is necessary to meet the ADA's require- ments. Others have largely ignored the ADA or have been ignorant of it. Al- though all of' the entities that have complied have incurred some costs, it does not appear that any of the dire economic predictions made by some have materialized. While a few initial concerns about the cost and feasibility were warrant- ed, some say, there have been many success stories to tell that display de- termination more than dollars. With the first report cards in, the results demonstrate that ingenuity and com- munity participation can bring the highest marks in efforts to establish equity among citizens with and with- out disabilities. What ADA Requires Of the five sections or titles of ADA, Title II and Title III have the greatest effect on city and county governments by prohibiting discrimination against persons with disabilities in employ- ment; requiring reasonable accommo- Some entities have been exemplary models for meeting the needs of people with disabilities while others simply have met ADA requirements. Still others have largely ignored the legislation. dations in the workplace; and, requir- ing the removal of barriers or the in- stallation of aids to allow access to public facilities, transportation and services. Since most of the provisions of ADA do not provide for watchdog -type over- sight or enforcement by a particular agency, the majority of ADA's require- ments are expected to come about as the result of voluntary compliance. Should problems arise, however, there are a number of federal agencies as- signed to handle complaints and/or pursue legal action against an alleged violator, be it a local business or a local government. In addition to the Justice Depart- ment, these include the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compli- ance Board; the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC); the Department of Transportation; and, the Federal Communications Commis- sion — all of which brew up into a no - tent alphabet soup of federal age involved with ADA. The prime handlers of complaints, however, are the Justice Department and the EEOC, which handles allega- tions of employment discrimination. Complaints may follow one of three main routes. A complaint may he found groundless after an initial in- vestigation and dropped by the federal agency. Or, a complaint may be inves- tigated and a decision made to pursue legal action to force compliance. The third approach involves seeking a res- olution of the situation through the col- laborative efforts of the federal and lo- cal officials and, in many cases, repre- sentatives from the community. For example, the complaint filed by the individual against the Clearwater Police Department fell under the guidelines of Title II, which states, ac- cording to a release by the Justice De- partment, "public entities, such as po- lice departments and municipal gov- ernments, must provide appropriate auxiliary aids and services whenever necessary to ensure effective commu- nication with individuals with disabil- ities." As an example of' the second re Philadelphia has been embroiled` legal tangle with federal courts over the installation of curb cuts. The city, calling on ADA's own language that al- lows exemptions when an "undue fi- nancial burden" would occur to the lo- cal government because of changes to existing structures, has pleaded its case but lost in the first round. In Kinney v. Yerusalim, the U. S. District Court of Eastern Pennsylva- nia, ruled that the city, in the process of resurfacing its city streets, must in- stall curb ramps or other types of sloped surface, using its interpretation of ADA Title II provisions. In its findings the court rejected the city's argument of "undue burden," saying that the exemption applied only in the cases ol'existing structures or fa- cilities. Resurfacing, it held, fell under the category of new construction or modifications where the "undue bur- den" definition is not applicable. An appeal is expected. What ADA Says But who besides the courts has de- fined "effective communication" or "un- due burden" or any of the other cif that some public officials have sau frustratingly vague or unclear in ADA? "Reasonable accommodations" are re- quired to meet the physical or mental limitations of some individuals yet "reasonable" is not clearly defined. August 1993 AMERICAN CITY & COUNTY Some cities and counties may be ex- empt from certain structural or facili- ty modifications, if doing so would de- stroy a registered historical site or, as Philadelphia tried to prove. would re- sult in an "undue financial burden." Who tallies the bill versus the budget and makes the final determination of "undue?" "If it were spelled out more specifi- cally we would know more of what we have to do," says Donald Lowe. county commissioner for Columbiana County, Ohio, about ADA guideline language. Lowe's frustration is understand- able, according to Stephen Percy, as- sociate professor of political science at the University of Wisconsin -Milwau- kee. Percy has studied and written on disability rights issues and specifically on ADA from the perspective of imple- mentation, "Many who read [ADA] with the idea of finding out 'What will I have to do' will not find it there," says Percy. Like any piece of legislation, Surette agrees, "ADA is subject to varying in- terpretations. As litigation progresses there will be a refinement and clarifi- cation." But, according to some experts, that lack of clear directives may work to lo- cal officials' advantage more than they realize. Since, as the case in Philadel- phia may finally prove, local leaders should not be so quick to seek specific interpretations of ADA, amendments or alterations if their hope is to gain exemption from compliance or more guidance on how to comply. Even the National Council on Dis- ability, the primary author of ADA, has recently gone on record saying that ADA should not be tinkered with; that the law, as it is written, should be given more time to allow the pursuit of a variety of approaches to compliance. "It is a very broad piece of legisla- tion," says Mark Quigley, a public af- fairs specialist with the Council. "And our recommendation is that no changes be made to the law at this time." "Clearly one of the things ADA did was to provide guidelines but did not set stringent requirements," says Per- cy. The hope is that the development of self -directed and innovative pro- grams and methods for ensuring equi- ty and accessibility by a number of lo- cal governments would foster innova- tive methods. These new concepts, such as the new Clearwater Police De- partment policy, could in turn serve as models for other communities as infor- mation is dispersed through network- ing or information services such as the Regional Disability and Business Technical Assistance Centers. The cen- ters are federally supported, regional- ly located distribution sites that field inquiries and compile policy develop- ments and rulings handed down on ADA and its interpretation. On its way to those centers now is the newly released "Clearwater Police Department Policy on Effective Com- munication in Situations Involving In- dividuals with Hearing Impairments." Some aspects covered include: inter- viewing a suspect with a hearing im- pairment; interrogating an arrestee with a hearing impairment; interview- ing a victim or critical witness with a hearing impairment; and determining the need for an interpreter or other ef- fective auxiliary aid to "ensure effec- tive communication" An individual with a disability need not be in public office to provide sig- nificant input to a community's deci- sions regarding ADA. In fact it is part and parcel of the ADA guidelines that residents with disabilities should be involved in local governments' pursuit of effective compliance programs. Lowe credits a local group of persons with disabilities with making both of- ficials and residents alike aware of. needs that were not obvious to a1 VICTORS (Very Important Challenge.. Towards Optimism Recovery and Sat- isfaction), was formed three years ago by some of local residents with disabil- ities. The group has provided valuable Heritage Park Lets Children Play "Side by Side" In the city of Irvine. Calif., the Heritage Park play- ground has gained wide ac- claim and several awards for its innovative design since its dedication one year ago. The playground is con- sidered a showpiece, a pro- totype for the 1990s with activities and equipment designed to provide equal play opportunities for all children, including those with physical and developmental dis- abilities. Last fall, Heritage Park placed first in the American Planning As- sociation's Orange County, Calif Section' Award competition and received a statewide APA Award of Merit. The California Parks and Recreation Society this year honored the park with its Award of Merit and Self -Esteem Award (for promoting the self-esteem of dis- abled children.) The genesis of Her- itage Park predates the legislative mandate of the ADA of 1992, ble. They chose the Her- itage Park playground, a two -acre, mostly worn-out facility built to 1970s stan- dards, for extensive up- grading. Extensive research was conducted by the city staff to determine how to make a playground more accessi- ble. Working with a task_ force comprising parents, to design a new playground outfitted with the most in- novative play equipment, safety flooring and related products available. Kompan Inc., the world's largest maker of play equipment, was selected to supply an "integrated playscape" consisting of col- orful, safe and accessible equipment to encourage which requires public Irvina's Heritage pork has garnered several award for Its Imovairee des playgrounds to be made "accessible to and useable teachers and education and four categories of"play: ac- by people with disabilities." recreation specialists, they tive, social, sensory and The idea was sparked by recommended creating a constructive -manipulative. a 1988 city survey of resi- playground where children Specialized play equip - dents with disabilities, who with disabilities could play ment included a fantasy said they needed social and side by side with able-bod- playhouse, pirate ship, recreational facilities more ied children. swings activated by upper - than any other municipal Armed with a $470,000 body motion and double - service. Most of the city's budget funded by the city wide slides and seesaws public parks were not ac- and a $175,000 state grant, with extra -wide seats to al- cessible at that time. the city's Community Ser- low helpers to assist chil- City officials subsequent- vices Department called dren with disabilities. ly initiated a broad series of upon Kammeyer & Associ- The equipment is deco - initiatives aimed at making ates, a landscape architec- rated in a variety of bright municipal facilities accessi- ture firm in Corona, Calif., colors to help children per- ceive distance and deter- mine spatial relationships. Other key features of the design included an elevat- ed sandbox to accommo- date wheelchairs, a Braille site map, an ampiitheater for children of all. abilities, a basketball half -court with adjustable hoop, a sensory garden and sound tubes to help children — especially those with visual im- pairments — enhance their senses. Since the equipment would be useless if dis- abled children could not reach it,. extra steps, handrails and raised areas with ramps throughout were added. Openings and walkways were widened to four feet and a turn -around area was provided to the main ramp for children in walkers and on crutches. The designers speci- fied installation of a rubberized surface to facilitate access and cushion the impact of falls. Playguard, a play- ground surface manu- factured by Carlisle Tire & Rubber Compa- ny, was installed over ap- proximately 2,000 square feet of Heritage Park. The shock -absorbing rubber tile is fabricated from the ground -up treads and buff- ings of used tire, according to John Yaw, Carlisle prod- uct manager. It acts as cushion to protect children from falls yet is sufficiently, firm to facilitate access by people with disabilities, es- pecially those requiring Ilse of a wheelchair. ❑ n. Auaust 1993 AMERICAN CITY & COUNTY insights, according to Lowe. "We never realized some of these things," he says. A ramp installed to allow access to the courthouse was fine, but once there a person using a wheelchair would dis- cover that the door swung the wrong way to allow easy entrance. In another matter, a space designat- ed as "Handicapped Parking" was sometimes partially blocked by the haphazard placement of a trash con- tainer. Not anymore. Peggy Shultz, president. of VIC- TORS, says that the group volunteered its talents to help the county in its ADA compliance program. And, al- though she says she has mixed feelings about the progress the county has made, overall she feels comfortable that good faith efforts arc being made. Shultz says that in many cases it is ignorance and not ill will that is to blame for failures in ADA compliance, especially in the realm of local govern- ment. But self -education and a lively exchange of information among many involved with ADA implementation holds promise, she says. As part of her evidence she notes that her group is frequently contacted to provide information on the strides they have made in noting deficiencies in access or service and in how local leaders can best access the recommen- dations and suggestions persons with disabilities can provide. Employment and Transportation It was obvious to many local officials that when ADA became law they would be on their own in implement- ing many of the alterations, modifica- tions and other adaptations needed to open buildings, workspaces and pro- grams to those with special needs. Many local governments had previ- ously made some improvements re- garding access, especially with regard to transportation, when the Rehabili- tation Act in the 1970s required that entities receiving federal funds comply with federal guidelines on accessibili- ty. But the new guidelines of ADA held in store many more changes that would receive little state or federal backing. In the area of workspaces, many communities are still struggling with the often tedious task of rewrit- ing job descriptions to eliminate dis- criminatory language that would re- strict or eliminate persons with dis- abilities from eligibility. The goal now is to come up with a description of the tasks involved as opposed to how the tasks must be performed. Marcia Magid, disability issues co- ordinator with the American Federa- tion of State, County and Municipal Employees, agrees with the findings of the National Council on Disability that indicate many initial fears of the po- tential burdens of ADA have been al- leviated. While there are still gaps in implementation regarding employ- ment and disability rights, she says, "on the whole it seems to he going rea- sonably well." Most local communities are relying upon state -provided examples and their city or county attorneys for as- sistance in rewording and reworking general job descriptions. But when it comes to making on -site accommoda- tions to individuals with disabilities al- ready employed or otherwise qualified for employment, specific assistance is often required. Again a federally sponsored resource has been assisting public and private employers in finding real, workable so- Iutions. `We give low tech through high tech solutions," says Anne Hirsh, human factors consultant with the Job Ac- commodation Network (JAN), head- quartered at West Virginia Universi- ty. "We handle all calls for those look- ing for different approaches to accom- modations, including those looking for the most cost effective." Funded through the U.S. Depart- ment of Labor, JAN provides callers with practical suggestions and exam- ples of how the use of such simple methods such as rearranging the lay- out of a desk can accommodate a per- son with a disability in one arm. Here are some other suggestions from JAN: Speaker phones may be ef- fective for people who are amputees or have other mobility impairments; tele- phone headsets and adaptive light switches can be used by people with cerebral palsy or other manual dis- abilities; special software for standard computers and other equipment and other equipment can enlarge print or convert print documents to spoken words for people with vision and/or reading disabilities; and, TDDs (Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf) make it possible for people with hearing and/or speech impairments to communicate over the telephone While low tech, low-cost options may often be available for work environ- ments, that may not hold true in the realm of transportation. More than 500 agencies, publicly and privately owned or operated, receive some type of federal support to meet the nations' transportation needs. If there is any aspect of ADA where guidelines are spelled out somewhat stringently, it is for those providing those transit ser- vices. And this was also the group that initially was the most vocal in their fears of ADA's financial demands. Flies Gnats Fire ants V Mosquitos can transmit Encephalitis V Ticks can transmit Lyme Disease and Rocky Mtn. fever V Biting flies and ants can cause allergic reactions V "An ounce of Prevention is worth a pound of cure" Ben Franklin PUBLIC WORKS PARKS SCHOOLS GOLF COURSES RESORTS CALL US TODAY WITH YOUR s\ 1-800-220-0787 OUTDOOR PEST PROBJ LEM / Adulticides Pro-Mistn, ULV Sprayer Larvicides 3255 Meetinghouse Road • Telford • PA • 18969 1-800-220-0787 • 215-721-9424 • FAX 215-721-0751 Mosquito, Tick & Flying Insect EnviroEngineered Control Products for Public Health & Outdoor Recreation Circle No. 23 on Reader Service Card But, according to a spokesman with the Federal Transit Authority (FTA), the agency charged with evaluating the implementation plans of those 500- some transit services, even those ter sions have been easing. To date, says Iry Chor, transport: tion specialist with FTA, only two of those services have requested exemp- tions on the grounds of undue financial burden. But with the final compliance deadline for implementing most of the transit provisions in five years, no de- cisions have been made yet regarding exemptions, though some have been granted time extensions. "So far implementation of the ADA transportation provisions is going well," says Chor. He is quick to ac- knowledge that the task facing many of these agencies, especially those serv- ing small communities, may seem daunting at first. Plans involve not only self -evaluations of existing ser- vices but also projections of future needs and services. Paratransit equip- ment — vans or busses equipped to transport wheelchairs and other, sim- ilar equipment — is required when other access is not available. These changes and requirements may be where the costs run highest in putting ADA into full force, he says. Progress, Promises, Success Reflecting the attitude of many f eral spokesman involved with evaluu.. ing the progress of state and local gov- ernments trying to find their way with ADA, Chor expresses an upbeat atti- tude, saying he does not see his role or his agency's role as adversarial with lo- cal governments. "Instead of seeking to find [entities] not in compliance," says Chor, "we have taken the approach that we can get compliance by providing whatever help we can." That sentiment is echoed by Mark Sakaley, a spokesman for the Depart- ment of Justice. He says that as com- munities such as Clearwater work to develop policies and programs that provide innovative ideas, those exam- ples are being shared through federal offices and other networking organiza- tions to help both public and private alike seek solutions and advice in mak- ing ADA work where they live. Says Cher, speaking of transit needs hut perhaps making a statement for the overall progress of ADA imple- mentation: "the test in the end is to ask `Is the service going to be out there?' And every indication is that will be." Sharon Grove is a freelance writer and a consulting editor for the Na- tional Association of Towns and Townships (NATaTi. 50 Auaust 1993 AMERICAN CITY & COUNTY AGENDA 75 STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Les Evans, Director of Public Works via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: October 5, 1993 SUBJECT: PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE PRIORITIES Recommendation: Adopt a street maintenance policy and a Five Year Pavement Management Plan. Fiscal Impact: The proposed maintenance policy and Pavement Management Plan assumes that the City Council will authorize funding in the Annual City Budget each fiscal year. Funds required to support the recommended program on an annual basis are approximately $250,000 of Measure "A" Funds (Fund 22) and $100,000 of Gasoline Tax Funds (Fund 21). Money is available in both Measure "A" and Gasoline Tax budgets to begin the program in 1993-94. Background and Analysis: Although City staff has inventoried and evaluated the condition of all paved streets in the City, the City Council has not established a maintenance policy for these streets. Typically, a regular maintenance program which includes patching, sealing and overlay can extend the life of a properly designed pavement indefinitely. Lack of maintenance, or a poorly designed street may cause major failures which cannot be repaired but must be totally reconstructed. An example of total failure is Warren Road between Esplanade Avenue and the Ramona Expressway. An example of a roadway which is in relatively good condition but will need some attention soon to avoid failure is Sanderson Avenue between Cottonwood and. Ramona Expressway. By spending $50,000 or less on a chip seal (rock and oil) treatment for this three-mile segment of Sanderson, the City may avoid the Warren Road situation which calls for complete reconstruction of three miles of road at an estimated cost of $740,000. Attached is a listing of the City's arterial streets which need attention and the estimated cost of the recommended treatment. Each street section has been assigned a priority rating based on the annual cost per lane mile (one mile of twelve foot wide pavement) of the recommended treatment divided by the average daily traffic. Utilizing the "Benefit Rating" priority list and the estimated available funds for street maintenance, a Five -Year Capital Improvement Program has been developed. The costs of rehabilitating Warren Road would commit all of the City's Measure "A" funds for a period of about three years. There is potential for receiving some FEMA funds for repair of flood damage to Warren Road. The City should soon know the result of its application for these funds. There is also the possibility of receiving Federal Highway funds for all or a portion of the Warren Road reconstruction on the basis of its regional signficance. Since there are other potential funding sources for Warren Road and since the Benefit Rating for reconstruction of Warren Road is less than other needed projects, the Council is advised to not make any major expenditures to repair Warren Road this year. Assuming no FEMA or Federal Highway funds are approved for Warren Road, then Measure "A" monies could be allocated in later years. Attachment PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM EXTENDED i LANE I TREATMENT ESTIMATED I LIFE OF NEW I BENEFIT REQUIRED! COST : PAVEMENT 1 RATING STREET NAME! SEGMENT MILES! ADT F Sanderson Avenue Ramona Expressway 5.50 1 10000lChip to Cottonwood Avenue Seal $39,531.001 5 years ' 0.14 Sanderson Avenue leventh Street to 1.00 , 10000 Chip Seal $7,188.001 5 years 0.14 ;Esplanade Avenue 1 Hewitt Avenue ?Commonwealth Avenue 0.90 1 i 3.30 j 8800 1 Slurry Seal ! F $6,469.001 5 years 0.16 Ito Park Avenue _ State Street to Ramona Expressway 7000 !Chip Seal f $23,719.00 5 years 0.21 [Lake Park Drive 1 , Ramona Blvd Chase Street ! 0.60 4000 !Slurry Seal $2,828.001 5 years 0,24 to Potrero Drive I1 ! Idyllwild Drive 'State Street to 2.00 3500 ;Slurry Seal $9,430.00J 5 years 1 0.27 San Jacinto Avenue Lyon Avenue Seventh Street 1.00 j 4600 "Chip Seal $7,187.00 5 years 1 0.31 Ito Esplanade Avenue 1 i I Seventh Street State Street to 1.50 7400 Grind and $95,000.00 20 years 1 0.43 ;San Jacinto Avenue 1 Overlay Portions Chip Seal I Lake Park Drive Ramona Expressway ! 1.60 F 3300 $11,500.00 5 years 0.44 I to Soboba Road Park Avenue Hewitt Avenue I 3.00 2000 !Slurry Seal $14,145.00 5years 0.47 :to Cornell Avenue i ' I Seventh Street San Jacinto Avenue ( 1.00 11200 Grind and $141,200.00 20 years 0.63 to Hewitt Avenue Overlay 7200 !Grid and Mountain Avenue Seventh Street to 1.50 $80,287.00 10 years 0.74 Esplanade Avenue Overlay Portions San Jacinto Avenue ;Ramona Expressway 1,80 1700 !Chip Seal $12,938.001 5 years 0.85 to Idyllwild Drive Cottonwood Avenue Lyon Avenue to 2.00 2300 !Various Overlay 28,750.00 7 years 0.89 I State Street and S urry Seventh Street Lyon Avenue 2.00 3800 (Reconstruction $119,025.00 15 years 1.04 to State Street Cottonwood Avenue Warren Road to 3.00 1 1300 ',Chip Seal $21,563.00 5 years 1.11 (Sanderson Avenue Soboba Road !Lake Park Drive to 2.40 F 1300 Chip Seal $17,250.001 5 years 1.11 ;City Limits 1.50 F 1250 Kirby Street !Cottonwood Avenue to Es lanade Avenue Chip Seal $10,781,00 5 years I 1- 1.15 Seventh Street ;Sanderson Avenue ! 2.00 11200 Chip Seal $14,375.00 5 years 1.20 to Lyon Avenue Soboba Road South of SR 79 1.30 1000 '.Chip Seal $9,344.001 5 years 1.44 Warren Road !Ramona Expresswa 7.40 t 3300 Reconstruction $740,000.00 20 years i 1.52 to Esplanade Avenue Lyon Avenue DeAnza Drive to 1 2.40 !, 3100 Reconstruction 240,000.00 20 years 1.61 Cottonwood Avenue 1 San Jacinto Avenue !Idyllwild Avenue . 0.50 5400 Grind and $48,300.0010 years 1.79 !to Main Street i Overlay I Ramona Blvd -Sanderson Avenue ' 3.00 ', 4000 Grind and $217,350.001 10 years 1.81 j to Sky View Lane j Overlay 1 j Main Street (Seventh Street to ; 1.50 4000 Grind and $117,000.001 10 years 1.95 San Jacinto Avenue Overlay I Main Street !San Jacinto Avenue 1.60 5700 Grind and $205,000.001 10 years ! 2.25 to Camino Los Banos Overlay Cottonwood Avenue Sanderson Avenue ! 2.00 2000 ,Grind and $96,600.00 10 years i 2.42 ;to Lyon Avenue 1 Overlay Lyon Avenue ;Cottonwood Avenue 1.00 2000 Grind and $48.300.0011 10 years 2.42 to State Street Overlay Chip Seal Allessandro Avenue ;Ramona Expressway 2.20 500 $15.813.001 5 years 2.88 to Main Street ! otrero Street 0..660 ! DeAnza Drive 1700 Reconstruction $42,435.001 10 years i 4.16 to State Street PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM DeAnza Drive Shaver Street Potter Road Ito Young Avenue Hewitt Avenue to Las Rosas Drive 2.00 1700 'iReconstruction $141,450.001 10 years 4.16 Potter Road Ramona Blvd to Commonwealth Avenue Potter Road DeAnza Drive San Jacinto Avenue to Hewitt Avenue Ramona Expressway to Ramona Blvd Camino Los Banos Artesia Avenue to Main Street Totals 67.70 .20 500 Grind and $28,950.00 Overlay Portions '.. 0.50 1800 Reconstruction S55.363.001 10 years 6.15 8 years 6.03 600 Grind and $48.300.001 Overlay 10 years 0.50 900 Reconstruction $55,363.00! 10 years 8.05 12.30 1.40 200 Grind and $67,620.00! Overlay $2,840,354.001 10 years 24.15 PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDED FIVE YEAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1993-94 CHIP/SLURRY SEAL AMOUNT SANDERSON AVENUE RAMONA EXP. TO ESPLANADE AVE. $50,000 HEWITT AVE. COMMONWEALTH AVE. TO PARK AVE. $7,000 RAMONA EXPRESSWAY STATE STREET TO LAKE PARK DRIVE $24,000 RAMONA BOULEVARD CHASE STREET TO POTRERO DRIVE $3,000 IDYLLWILD DRIVE STATE STREET TO SAN JACINTO AVENUE $10,000 LYON AVENUE SEVENTH STREET TO ESPLANADE AVENUE $8,000 REHABILITATION SEVENTH STREET STATE STREET TO HEWITT AVENUE 93-94 TOTAL 1994-95 CHIP/SLURRY SEAL LAKE PARK DRIVE RAMONA EXPRESSWAY TO SOBOBA ROAD PARK AVENUE HEWITT STREET TO CORNELL STREET SAN JACINTO AVENUE RAMONA EXPRESSWAY TO IDYLLWILD DRIVE COTTONWOOD AVENUE LYON AVENUE TO STATE STREET COTTONWOOD AVENUE WARREN ROAD TO SANDERSON AVENUE MOUNTAIN AVENUE SEVENTH STREET REHABILITATION SEVENTH STREET TO EXPLANADE LYON AVENUE TO STATE STREET 94-95 TOTAL $102,000 $250,000 $352,000 $12,000 $15,000 $13,000 $30,000 $22,000 $92,000 $81,000 $120,000 $201,000 S293,000 Page 1 1995-96 CHIP/SLURRY SEAL SOBOBA ROAD LAKE PARK DRIVE TO CITY LIMITS $20,000 KIRBY STREET COTTONWOOD AVENUE TO ESPLANADE AVENUE $12,000 LOCAL STREETS FIRST, SHERIFF, JORDAN, MISTLETOE, ETC. $68,000 $100,000 REHABILITATION WARREN ROAD ESPLANADE AVE. TO COTTONWOOD AVE. $250,000 95_96 TOTAL $350,000 1996-97 CHIP/SLURRY SEAL LOCAL STREETS $100,000 WARREN ROAD 1997-98 SEVENTH STREET SOBOBA ROAD ALESSANDRO AVENUE LOCAL STREETS WARREN ROAD REHABILITATION COTTON WOOD AVE. TO 1 MI. NORTH OF $250,000 COTTONWOOD AVE. 96_97 TOTAL $350,000 CHIP/SLURRY SEAL SANDERSON AVENUE TO LYON AVENUE SOUTH OF SR 79 RAMONA EXPRESSWAY TO MAIN STREET REHABILITATION $15,000 $10,000 $16,000 $59,000 $100,000 ONE MILE NO. OF COTTONWOOD AVE. $250,000 TO RAMONA EXPRESSWAY 97-98 TOTAL $350,000 Page 2 i + DA S T A F F R E P O R T TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance Director via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager SUBJ: 1993-94 Budget Update Election of the Teeter Plan DATE: October 5, 1993 RECOMMENDATION 1. Receive and file 1993-94 fiscal year budget update. 2. Direct Staff to submit a mid year budget report with appropriate budget amendment resolution in January 1994. 3. Adopt resolution declining to participate in the Teeter Plan with the County of Riverside. BACKGROUND The City Council asked that staff bring back a budget update when the affects of the State trailer bills were known. All bills affecting revenue have been signed by the Governor at this point. The first section of this memorandum provides an update of the 1993-94 budget, including the revenue picture as affected by the State budget cuts and current economic conditions. It also discusses our departmental expenditures as well as actions necessary to retain a balanced 1993-94 budget. The second section analyzes the Teeter Plan and makes a recommendation on the City's possible participation with the County. 1993-94 BUDGET UPDATE Revenue The City Council adopted a budget based upon conservative revenue estimates for Fiscal Year 1993-94. We anticipated a continuation of the economic slowdown and had assumed that building related revenues would continue to be significantly reduced. That approach was born out, as we have experienced a trend of slightly reduced revenue during the first quarter of this fiscal year. During this period, several new residential tracts have also closed, which will have a negative corresponding impact on our already reduced construction related revenues. Page 2 1993-94 Budget Update October 5, 1993 As part of our ongoing budget administration we have monitored our actual revenues received to date and corresponding estimated revenues. Based on this monitoring, we project that our 12 month fiscal year revenues from construction permits, planning fees, and plan check fees will be reduced by approximately 35%, property taxes down by 2% and a 75s loss of franchise fees due to the recycling JPA. The State buduet cuts consisted of $81,000. On the other hand, it is estimated that the City will experience an increase of 4% due to increased sales tax, motor vehicle license fees and homeowners property tax relief. The State cut also allowed for cities to receive up to 50% of the loss ($40,500) for public safety services from the continuance of the 1/2 cent sales tax from July to December 31, 1993. (With this $40,500 in replacement revenue, the net affect of the 1993-94 state budget cuts has been $40,500.) Overall, the net affect is anticipated to be a $105,362 decrease in revenue for fiscal year 1993-94. Therefore, in order to retain a balanced budget, the following measures have been taken. Expenditures On June 30, 1993 the City Council adopted a "bare bones" budget for the 1993-94 fiscal year which eliminated all employee travel, as well as staffing, benefit freezes and maintenance/operation reductions. In order to offset the revenue shortfall, the staff is proposing that the $105,362 be obtained from reduction in department expenditures. This will primarily be found from savings by having not filled all budgeted positions during the first quarter. At this point, staff also does not anticipate filling the Senior Building Inspector position on a permanent basis during the 1993-94 fiscal year. Actions to be taken to balance the budget. Our staff continues to pursue efficiencies and ways to either reduce expenses or increase revenue. Some examples of these are the parking citation program which the City Council will be taking action on October 5, as well as consideration of user fees and a revised business license program. This will also be presented to the City Council in future meetings. Staff is also looking at alternative ways to provide service, including working with other governmental agencies for delivery of fire and medical aid services, the consideration of CFD No. 4 and consolidating our purchasing by buying in bulk from agencies such as the County of Riverside. Page 3 1993-94 Budget Update October 5, 1993 TEETER PLAN Section 4701 of Chapter 3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California allows an alternative method for distributing property tax levies (Teeter Plan). The County elected to authorize an alternative method this fiscal year. Cities have the option, by resolution, to elect to enter into the Teeter Plan annually by July 15. The State, however, has extended the election period to October 15, 1993. Once an election is made to enter the Plan, cities have the option to decline only if 2/3 of the cities so elect or if the County of Riverside elects not to continue authorizing the plan. If the City of San Jacinto elected to join the Teeter Plan, the County estimates that $130,762.27 would be our gross share of the delinquency taxes. The City would receive an additional $84,854 above existing revenues in 1993-94 if we elected to participate in the Teeter plan. Staff has made an analysis of the Teeter Plan which shows that the City of San Jacinto would start accruing net losses in the potential revenue stream starting with the second year of the plan (Teeter vs. Non -Teeter). Yearly net losses between fiscal year 1995 and the year 2003 average $14,830. This annual loss would continue for as long as 2/3 of the participating cities choose to stay in the plan. This option to join the plan, while attractive given our current revenue picture, sacrifices our future revenue stream. It is, therefore, recommended that the City not join in the Teeter Plan. Preliminary TEETER PLAN ANALYSIS CITY OF SAN JACINTO SECURED PROPERTY TAX FY 1993 Actual FY 1994 FY 1995 FY 1996 FY 1997 FY 1998 FY 1999 FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 Teeter Plan Secured Property Tax Assessments * 633,175 651,058 664,079 677,361 690,908 704,726 718,821 733,197 747,861 762,818 778,075 Buyout delinquencies thru 6/30/93 "" 124,224 Interest & Penalties Forgone (28%) (34,783) (13,910) (14,000) (14,092) (14,186) (14,282) (14,380) (14,480) (14,582) (14,685) TOTAL 633,175 740,499 650,170 663,361 676,816 690,540 704,539 718,817 733,381 748,237 763,389 NON -TEETER PLAN (NTP) Secured Property Tax Assessments Delinquencies (9% Cnty Average) Paid Delinquencies (27% of buyout + delinquencies) Interest & Penalties (28%) TOTAL GAIN/(LOSS) Teeter vs. Non -Teeter Cumulative annual gain or (loss) 651,058 664,079 677,361 690,908 704,726 718,821 733,197 747,861 762,818 778,075 (58,595) (59,767) (60,962) (62,182) (63,425) (64,694) (65,988) (67,307) (68,654) (70,027) 49,361 49,678 50,000 50,330 50,665 51,008 51,357 51,714 52,077 52,448 13,821 13,910 14,000 14,092 14,186 14,282 14,380 14,480 14,582 14,685 655,645 667,899 680,399 693,148 706,152 719,417 732,947 746,747 760,823 775,181 84,854 (17,730) (17,038) (16,332) (15,613) (14,878) (14,129) (13,366) (12,586) (11,792) 84,854 67,124 50,086 33,754 18,141 3,263 (10,867) (24,232) (36,819) (48,610) Assumptions: Delinquency Rate 9% 9% 9% 7% 7% 7% 5% 5% 5% 5% Growth Rate 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Includes $47,586 delinquencies, Interest & Penalties " City receives 95% of $130,762 which is County's estimated share of delinquent tax at June 30, 1993. Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, MADE PURSUANT TO SECTION 4715 OF THE REVENUE AND TAXATION CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLINING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR DISTRIBUTION OF TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS KNOWN AS THE TEETER PLAN WHEREAS, the County of Riverside has elected to authorize an alternative method for distributing property tax levies and collections on the secured roll for the 1993-94 fiscal year and years thereafter as well as for delinquencies for prior fiscal years, pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 4701) of Part 8 of Division 1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, Section 4715 of the Revenue and Taxation code allows a public district for which the County treasury is not the legal depositary unless such agency agrees, by resolution, to participate in the Alternative Method of Distribution of Taxes (TEETER PLAN); and WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto has made an unfavorable determination of benefit based upon the receipt, analysis and presentation of relevant data from the County of Riverside; and WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto wishes to decline to make applicable to it the alternative method of distribution authorized by Chapter 3, Part 8 of Division 1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, that the City of San Jacinto declines to participate in an alternative method of property tax apportionment known as the Teeter Plan and shall remain in effect for each fiscal year thereafter unless rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3, Part 8 of Division 1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a copy of this resolution to the Auditor -Controller of the County of Riverside forthwith. MOVED PASSED and ADOPTED this 5th day of October 1993. MAYOR Attest: Deputy City Clerk A STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: October 5, 1993 SUBJECT: Authorization to Submit Police Hiring Supplement Program Grant Proposal RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the submission of a Grant Proposal for the Police Hiring Supplement Program if matching funds can be found. BACKGROUND The Department of Justice has announced a new grant program that would make direct grants to law enforcement officers as part of an overall plan or strategy to address crime and related problems through community policing. A total of $150 million will be made available for these grants, beginning in Fiscal Year 1993. Fifty percent of the funds ($75 million) will be awarded to applicants serving jurisdictions of less than $150,000. Submitted applications will be considered competitively in three rounds. Applications for the first round are due no later than October 14, 1993. An excerpt from the application package has been attached, which provides more information on the program, goals, and requirements. The grant requires a match of 50% by the local agency. There is also a provision that if sufficient evidence can be shown of extraordinary economic hardship, that the federal share can be increased. VVe are currently reviewing potential sources for the required matching funds as well as the availability of funds for the continuation of the officers after the three year program. I have asked Acting Chief Holmes to give you an oral report on the city's proposed grant application at your October 5th meeting. He will also be available to answer questions that you might have. Police Hiring Supplement Program Overview The Department of Justice. Office of Jusuce Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA), announces a new competitive grant program, the program requirements, and administrative guidance for jurisdictions eligible to appiy for grants under this program. The Police Hiring Supplement Program is hereinafter referred to as the Program. The Program will make direct grants to law enforcement jurisdictions to hire and/or rehire additional sworn law enforcement officers as part of an overall plan or strategy to address crime and related problems through community policing. An applicant's plan should reflect its community's unique needs and be responsive to local circumstances. In general, community policing is designed to forge effective crime -fighting partnerships between law enforcement and the community. These partnerships, using a problem-oridnuxi approach, can result in innovative and tailored strategies for preventing and controlling crime. As part of their community policing efforts, communities have used various strategies to address crime problems, including multi- disciplinary crime prevention teams, public education programs, neighborhood resource centers. and foot patrols. A total of $150 million is available for these grants, beginning in Fiscal Year 1993. Fifty percent of the funds i$75 million) will be awarded to applicants serving jurisdictions with populations of 150,000 and above. Fifty percent of the funds ($75 million) will he awarded to applicants serving jurisdictions with populations of less than 150,000. These funds may be used to help pay salaries and fringe benefits of newly sworn officers, excluding overtime, for a 3- year pcnod. Funding will commence at the time, and not until, a hired or rehired officer is sworn in. The deployment of new hires and the selection of the officers ict implement the individual projects funded under this Program will be at the discretion of the local jurisdiction. Program Goals and Objectives The goals of the Program are to: increase the number of sworn law enforcement officers serving areas where they are needed MOSL • improve the long-term ability of law enforcement agencies to engage in community policing by deploying additional sworn law enforcement officers. • improve public safety through innovative crime prevention, including community policing. The objectives are to: hire additional law enforcement officers to increase sworn officer deployment and expand community poiicing designed to prevent crime, promote problem solving, and enhance public safety. • rehire law enforcement officers who have been laid off (as a result of State and local budget reductions) to increase sworn officer deployment and expand community policing. Eligibility Requirements Applications are invited from all law enforcement agencies, or consortia of law enforcement agencies, that can demonstrate a•significant need for additional sworn law enforcement officers and are committed to using community policing to address crime and related problems in their jurisdictions. Eligible applicants under this program are law enforcement agencies that recruit and hire law enforcement officers who serve local communities. State law enforcement agencies may apply if they have law enforcement jurisdiction and provide local law enforcement services to communities within their State. Application Requirements The application must be. developed in consultation with community groups and appropnate public and private agencies and must.: A. demonstrate the urisdiction's public safety need for additional sworn law enforcement officers; B. include a strategy for community policing in the jurisdiction; C. include an implementation plan that specifies how the funds awarded under this project will help deploy additional sworn police for community policing activities; D. describe a plan to continue the r:oject and retain the positions at the end of the grant :riod; E. discuss the availability and use of non -project funds and resources from other organizations; and F. provide a detailed budget proposal to support the grant request. A. Public Safety Need: (40 percent of the Selection Criteria) Provide a narrative that describes the community's need for additional sworn law enforcement officers, as well as the reason(s) local funding is not available to meet these needs. The narrative should describe the jurisdiction's overall crime situation and highlight positive steps already taken to improve law enforcement effectiveness. These highlights might include, for example, any efforts already made to reduce the number of sworn officers in administrative positions. It is important to make the strongest case possible. Include any special conditions or factors that help to document your needs, such as relevant demographic trends and/or significant unemployment problems resulting from plant or military base closings, natural disasters, etc. In addition to the narrative, provide information on the following factors, to the extent that it is available: 1. The population for the jurisdiction according to he 1990 U.S. Census. 2. The unemployment rate for the jurisdiction for each of the last 5 years. 3. The ratio of population u:it sworn officers, expressed as number of residents per sworn officer. The number and types of citizen calls for service i.e., emergency, non -emergency, violent offense, property offense, etc.) handled by patrol officers for each of the last 5 years. 5. The jurisdiction's Uniform Crime .-.eport (UCR) rates tor their equivalent) for all Part offenses for each of the last 5 years. The actual number of Cull -time and part-time civilians and sworn law enforcement officers mpioved during each of the last 5 years. 7. The number of officers deployed, by function (administrative. patrol. and investigative, during each of the last 5 years. 8. The actual number of sworn officers laid off and/or furloughed during each of the last 5 years. 9. The actual operational expenditures for police services and total expenditures by the jurisdiction for each of the past 5 years. 10. The expenditures for police overtime and/or the amount of compensatory time granted in lieu of overtime spending for each of the past 5 years; provide an explanation for overtime expenditures. B. Strategy: (30 percentof the Selection Criteria) Develop a 3-year strategy that specifies how additional sworn law enforcement officers would lead to increased community policing targeted against crime and related problems in the jurisdiction. The strategy narrative should describe: 1. Any community policing activities currently used by the applicant, emphasizing those efforts that promote law enforcement partnerships with citizens and non -law enforcement organizations. 2. How the applicant will involve community leaders and residents in planning, implementing, and coordinating this project with non -law enforcement organizations. 3. How the applicant will coordinate this project with other criminal justice system components, including an assessment of the effects of additional police on these agencies. 4. The specific geographic area(s) to be served by this project and the crime and related problems that community policing would address effectively. 5. The specific strategies and innovations that the applicant will employ to respond L-it identified problems. 6. How the applicant will select the officers who will be assigned to community policing. (These officers do not need to be the otficers actually hired with these project funds.) 7, How the applicant will assess how well the project was implemented and the extent to which the strategy has achieved the Program' s goals and objectives. C. Implementation Plan: (10 percenJ or the Selection Criteria) Provide a plan for implementing the strategy descnbed in B. above. Provide a detailed schedule that includes milestones for significant tasks. The schedule and milestones must include the expected dates when newly hired/rehired officers will be sworn and deployed. Also provide the dates when officers will be assigned to project -related community policing activities. D. Continuation and Retention Plan: (10 percent Of the Selection Criteria) Describe how the applicant intends to continue this project and retain the positions created with the project funds following the conclusion of the grant period. If possible, include an endorsement of the jurisdiction's continuation and retention plan by local budget authorities. E. Additional Resource Commitments: uo percent if the Selection Criteria) Applicants are encouraged to apply other resources, Federal. State, local, or private, in suppon of this project. Describe the sources and the amounts of non -project funding or resources that will be available from all sources. Describe how those resources will be used. If no other funds or resources are available. please explain. F. Budget Proposal: The application must contain a budget and budget narrative that specifically identifies salary and fringe benefits costs. Salary and fringe benefits costs are the only allowable costs. Standard fringe benefits paid by the jurisdiction should be supponed by a list of itemized costs explaining what is included in the benefits package. Expenditure of project funds for overtime is expressly forbidden. The budget 1-)reakdown must show the number oi officers to DC hired, the salary and fringe benefits per otficer, and 'he total salary and fringe benefits costs. Estimate scheduled salary increases, if any, over the life of the :Jam. Program Evaluation In addition to the assessment referenced in Application Requirements, section B. number 7, a national -level evaluation of this Program may be conducted in the future. The evaluation would use some combination of process and impact measures that may include, but would not be limited to, crime and victimization indices, quality -of -life measures, community perceptions, indications of changes in management philosophy, and individual police perceptions of their own work. Evaluators may visit sites to collect data for the evaluation. All selected applicants must be willing to participate in such national evaluation. Selection Criteria Applications will be evaluated based on the extent to which they meet the following weighted criteria: Public Safety Need 40 percent Soundness of Strategy 30 percent Clarity and Appropriateness of Implementation Plan 10 percent Continuation and Retention Plan 10 percent Additional Resource Commitments . 10 percent The Department of Justice will award grants to those applicants that best meet all these cntena. Consideration may also be given to equitable distribution of grants based on geographic or other factors. Federal Share For each officer funded under this program, the Federal share may not exceed the greater of (1) 75 percent of the total salary and benefits over the life of the grant, up to a maximum of 575,000: OR (2) 50 percent of the total salary and benefits over the life of the grant. The authorized Federal share per officer may be increased upon submission of sufficient extraordinary economic hardship, resulting irom such factors as economic dislocation. a natural iisaster, or other severe mitigating .:ircumstances. .--„n increase in the Federalshare wfil be zranted only in the most extreme circumstances. If the applicant agency is requesting an increase in Federal share, include the narrative and documentation justifying the request as an appendix to the application. Indicate on Standard Form 424-- Budget Information —in Section F. Block 23, that a request is being submitted. Grantees may specify how the Federal share is disbursed over the life of the grant. Distribution of Funds As stated in the Overview, the total amount available for this program is $150 million, which will be allocated as follows: 1. S75 million will be allocated for grants to applicants serving jurisdictions with populations of 150,000 and above. 2. S75 million will be allocated for grants to applicants serving jurisdictions with populations of less than 150,000. Application Process All applications must be submitted on 81/2 x II paper. The program narrative portion of the application should be no more than 30 pages double-spaced and hould be printed on one side of the paper only. All applicants must also submit an Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424), a signed original and three copies. A copy of this form is provided in Appendix B of this application kit. Video presentations will not be accepted. Applications submitted via FAX will not be accepted. Executive Order 12372 requires applicants from State and local units of government or other organizations providing services within a State to submit a copy of the application to the State Single Point of Contact (SPOC), if one exists, and if the Program has been selected for review by the State. A list of the State Single Point of Contacts is available in Appendix A of this application kit. Applicants must contact their State SPOC to determine if the Program has been selected for review by the State. n addition to the required standard assurances that are part of the Standard Form 424. each application 'nust include a certification that Federal funds made available under the zrant will not be used to supplant State or local funds, but will be used to increase the amount of State or local funds that would be available for law enforcement purposes in the absence of Federal funds. In submitting applications which involve a consortium of more than one agency, the relationships among the parties must be set forth in the application. In the event of a consortium submission, one agency must be designated as the payee to receive and disburse project funds and to be responsible for the supervision and coordination of the activities of the consortium members. Each co -applicant must sign the Standard Form-424. The original and three copies of the application must be sent to: U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Control Desk, Room 948 633 Indiana Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20531 Application Format The following format and guidance are provided to assist the applicant in writing and organizing the program narrative section of the application. To assist the application review, the narrative should be presented in the same order as in the Application Requirements above: Public Safety Need Section: This descriptive narrative should respond to Section A, page 2. Information relating to items 1-10 should be displayed in a list format in the order in which they appear. Strategy Section: This descriptive narrative should respond to Section B, page 2. Implementation Plan Section: This descriptive narrative should respond to Section C. page 3. Continuation and Retention Plan Section: This descriptive narrative should respond to Section D, page 3. Additional Resource Commitments Section: This descriptive narrative should respond to Section E, page 3. NDA STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Laurie Mora, Deputy City Clerk Via: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager DATE: October 5, 1993 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Appointments RECOMMENDATION: Appoint one (1) Planning Commissioner to begin immediately serving a short term of office expiring October 31, 1996; appoint two (2) Planning Commissioners to begin serving full terms of office on November 10, 1993 with terms of office expiring October 31, 1997. BACKGROUND On September 21, 1993 the City Council interviewed ten applicants to fill three vacant seats on the Planning Commission. A consensus of the city Council indicated a need to re -interview five of the ten applicants. The second interview of those five applicants has been set for October 5, 1993 at 6:00 P.M.