HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 1/19/1993AGENDA
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS ll-IE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
DATE: January 19, 1993
TIME: 7:30 P.M.
PLACE: COMMUNITY CENTER
625 South Pico
San Jacinto, California
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
Roll Call
Moment of Silence for Reflection
Pledge of Allegiance
2.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
3.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
3.1 Donation Presentation from the Fun House
RECOMMENDATION: Accept donation and present Certificate of
Appreciation.
3.2 Service Recognition Award for Mary Ann Smith
RECONNIENDATION: Recognition for five years of service.
3.3 Graffiti Prodamation - Chadwick Af2S� Uf 2_!
4.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS
Any person may address the Council on any subject pertaining to city business not
listed on the agenda, during this portion of the meeting. A limitation of three (3)
minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the Council.
5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be
enacted by one motion by the City Council in the form listed.
There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless
members of the City Council, staff or the public requests specified items to be
removed and/or discussed.
Anyone wishing to discuss a Consent Calendar item should come forward, upon
invitation of the Mayor, state their name, address and the Consent Calendar item
number. Speakers should limit comments to three minutes.
5.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting of January 5, 1993
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
January 5, 1993, as presented.
5.2 Minutes of Special Meeting of January 7, 1993
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of
January 7, 1993, as presented.
5.3 Minutes of Adjourned Meeting of January 8, 1993
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of
January 8, 1993, as presented.
5.4 Minutes of Special Meeting of January 12, 1993
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of
January 12, 1993, as presented.
5.5 Warrant Register
RECOIVNINDATION: Approve Warrant No. 31107 through 31266
dated January 15, 1993 in the amount of $52,398.36 and payroll check
numbers 21675 through 21773 dated January 15, 1993 in the amount of
$144,092.28.
5.6 Claim - Ramon Ruiz - File # JS 93-15
RECOMMENDATION: Reject the daim as recommended by the Claims
Adjustor pursuant to Government Code Section 913.
5.7 Claim - Antonia Ruiz Delgado -File # JS 93-15
RECOMMENDATION: Reject the daim as recommended by the Claims
Adjustor pursuant to Government Code Section 913.
5.8 Revised Threshold for Determining Timing of Public Improvements
RECOMMENDATION: Waive the reading in full and read by title only,
and adopt (Second Reading) Ordinance No. 974
2
ORDINANCE NO. 974
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CAUFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 12 AND 15 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE,
SECTIONS 12.08.020, 12.08.060 AND 15.04.010 RELATED TO TIMING AND
EXEMPTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION
5.9 1991 Uniform Building Codes (U.B.C.) and Related Codes and
Standards
RECOMMENDATION: Waive the reading in full and read by title only,
and adopt (Second Reading) Ordinance No. 975 adopting the 1991
Uniform Building Codes (U.B.C.) and Related Codes and Standards.
ORDINANCE NO. 975
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
ADOPTING THE 1991 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE AND ANNUAL SUPPLEMENTS,
THE 1991 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS, THE 1991 UNIFORM
MECHANICAL CODE, THE 1991 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, THE 1991 UNIFORM
ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THE 1991 UNIFORM HOUSING CODE, THE 1991
UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, THE 1991
UNIFORM SIGN CODE, THE 1991 UNIFORM SECURITY CODE, THE 1991
UNIFORM SWIMMING POOL, SPA AND HOT TUB CODE, THE 28TH EDITION OF
THE 1991 ASTM STANDARDS IN BUILDING CODES, INCLUDING APPENDICES
AND ANNUAL PUBLISHED SUPPLEMENTS OF THE ABOVE NOTED CODES. THE
ABOVE CODES ARE AS ADOPTED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF
BUILDING OFFICIALS, THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND
MECHANICAL OFFICIALS, AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
5.10 1991 Uniform Fire Codes (U.F.C.) and Related Codes and Standards
RECOMMENDATION: Waive the reading in full and read by title only,
and adopt (Second Reading) Ordinance No. 976 adopting the 1991
Uniform Fire Codes (U.F.C.) and Related Codes and Standards with
certain amendments.
ORDINANCE NO. 976
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
ESTABLISHING A FIRE AND SAFETY INSPECTION PROGRAM; ESTABLISHING
CERTAIN FEES; ADOPTING THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1991 EDITION, MATH
CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, THE UNIFORM FIRE CODES STANDARDS, 1991
EDITION, AND THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION STANDARDS
13, 1991 EDITION, 13-D, 1991 EDITION, AND 13-R, 1991 EDITION; PRESCRIBING
REGULATIONS GOVERNING CONDITIONS HAZARDOUS USES OR OPERATIONS;
ESTABLISHING A BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, PROVIDING OFFICERS
THEREOF AND DEFINING THEIR POWERS AND DUTIES, AND; REPEALING
ORDINANCE NO. 917
5.11 Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Buildings
RECOMMENDATION: Waive the reading in full and read by title only,
and adopt (Second Reading) Ordinance No. 977 approving the
Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Buildings.
ORDINANCE NO. 977
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ADDING
CHAPTER 15.17 TO TITLE 15 OF THE SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING EARTHQUAKE HAZARD REDUCTION IN EXISTING BUILDINGS
5.12 Norton Air Force Base Defense Finance and Accounting Service Center
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. supporting the location
of a Department of Defense, Defense Finance and Accounting Service
(DFAS) Center at Norton A.F.B.
RESOLUTION NO. to
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE LOCATION OF A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,
DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE (DFAS) CENTER AT NORTON
AF.B.
5.13 Community Facilities District No. 3, Annexation No. 4
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. adopting the preliminary
Boundary Map showing the territory proposed to be annexed to the
existing district; and Resolution No. dedaring intention to annex and
setting the matter for Public Hearing on March 2, 1993.
RESOLUTION NO. ZF . '
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING BOUNDARY MAP SHOWING TERRITORY TO BE
ANNEXED TO AN EXISTING CONIWIIUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO AN EXISTING
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
5.14 Community Facilities District No. 2 Phase II Improvements Notice of
Completion
RECOMMENDATION: Approve and aci-Ppt the off -site improvements for
CFD No. 2, Phase II which have been completed by Genesis
Construction and authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion.
4
5.15 Deferred Compensation Plan
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. amending the City's
deferred compensation plan to include Lincoln National Life Insurance
Company as a program administrator.
RESOLUTION NO. Z-4.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CAUFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY'S DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN AS
PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 1931
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion by: Seconded by: to approve consent calendar items
5.1 through 5.15, and adopt Ordinance No. 974 through Ordinance No. 977, and adopt
Resolution No. through Resolution No.
6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
6.1 Graffiti Abatement - Beautification Ordinance Amendment (continued
from 1-5-93)
RECONIVIENDAIION: \Naive the reading in full and read by title only,
and introduce (First Reading) Ordinance No. repealing Ordinance No.
954 amending the Beautification Ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO OF SAN
JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.04 TO TITLE 8 OF THE SAN
JACINTO MUNICIPAL CODE AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 954 RELATING
TO CONVMUNITY BEAUTIFICATION
6.2 1991 Uniform Fire Code (U.F.C.) - Fees - (continued from 1-5-93)
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. establishing fees relative
to the Uniform Fire Code and related codes and standards.
RESOLUTION NO. 24 677
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR CERTAIN
SERVICES PERFORMED FOR AND OR BY THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO FIRE
DEPARTMENT AND THE MI11GA11ON OF THE IMPACTS OF NEW COMMERCIAL
AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO FIRE
DEPARTMENT
6.3 1991 Uniform Building Code (U.B.C.) - Fees - (continued from 1-5-93)
RECONIUIENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. establishing fees relative
to the Uniform Building Code and related codes and standards.
RESOLUTION NO. 2 q, r
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR CERTAIN
SERVICES PERFORMED FOR AND OR BY THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO FIRE AND
LIFE SAFETY DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF SAN JACINTO
ORDINANCE NO. 975
7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS
7.1 Update on Lake Park Dr. Road Crossing and Northwest Area Flooding -
Evans
RECOMMENDATION: Receive Oral Report
7.2 Parkway Master Plan - Evans
RECOMMENDATION: Approve and adopt the Parkway Master Plan
prepared by Kammeyer and Associates dated October 6, 1992 with
revisions on October 29, 1992 and December 2, 1992.
7.3 Social Service and Non -Profit Organizations Fee Waivers - McNabb
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. thereby establishing
Council policy for budget allocations and/or fee waivers for social service
agencies and non-profit organizations.
RESOLUTION NO. Z,69
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA DETERMINING THAT BUDGET ALLOCATIONS AND FEE WAIVERS
MAY BE GRANTED TO SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCIES AND NON-PROFIT
ORGANIZATIONS
7.4 19th Year Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Calendar
Outline- Anderson
RECOMMENDATION: Receive Oral Report
7.5 Land of the Free Movie - McNabb
RECOMMENDATION: Receive oral report and possible action on
related issues.
6
8.0 MAYOR/ COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
8.1 Joint Sessions with City of Hemet
RECOMMENDATION: Confirm a Joint Meeting to discuss a Joint
Powers Agreement and potential joint projects, tentatively scheduled for
February 9, 1993 at 6:30 P.M. at the City of Hemet, and March 2, 1993
at 6:00 P.M. at the City of San Jacinto.
9.0 CLOSED SESSION
9.1 Foredosure Assessment District 87-1, pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9, for Pending Litigation
10.0 ADJOURNMENT
Motion by:
Vote:
Seconded by: Action: to adjourn.
I, Maurice Armster, do hereby certify that I caused to be posted the foregoing agenda
this 15th day of January, 1993, as required by law.
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
7
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE RESOLUTION NO.
CITY OF HEMET RESOLUTION NO.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO RESOLUTION NO.
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITIES OF
HEMET AND SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, TO COMMIT THEIR
RESOURCES TO A GRAFFITI -FREE VALLEY
WHEREAS, graffiti and related criminal activity has created a threat to
the security and well being of the citizens and businesses of the San Jacinto
Valley; and
WHEREAS, it is imperative that a visible, active and unified effort to
combat such activity be made by all San Jacinto Valley residents; and
WHEREAS, it is incumbent upon elected officials and community leaders to
protect property, prevent crime, and keep the San Jacinto Valley beautiful;
and
WHEREAS, the Valley Gang Task Force, the Hemet -San Jacinto Board of
Realtors, the Hemet and San Jacinto School Districts, the City of Hemet, the
City of San Jacinto, and the County of Riverside, along with concerned
citizens are sponsoring a campaign to stop and remove graffiti and its
underlying causes; and
WHEREAS, San Jacinto Valley leaders of business, schools, government,
law enforcement, media, religious institutions, service organizations, senior
citizens, parents, and youth will demonstrate their commitment to a clean and
beautiful San Jacinto Valley by participating in a graffiti removal campaign
on Saturday, January 23, 1993.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City of Hemet, the City of San
Jacinto, and the County of Riverside, that all three agencies do hereby
commit their resources to ensure the success of a graffiti -free San Jacinto
Valley; and that the foregoing three agencies do hereby state their
intentions to see that perpetrators of graffiti receive the maximum penalty
allowed by law; and that all members of the community are encouraged to
participate in this effort by reporting any locations of graffiti to the 24
hour Graffiti Removal Hotline (909) 765-2309, by volunteering their time to
remove graffiti in their immediate neighborhoods, and by participating in
volunteer community patrols to report graffiti vandals to law enforcement
agencies.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 1993. vote:
ATTEST:
Kay Ceniceros, Riverside County Supervisor
Ken Wolford, City of Hemet Mayor
Henry Hafliger, City of San Jacinto Mayor
STATE/ OF CALIFORNIA
COUSTTY OF RIVERSIDE
I, Maurice Armster, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution No. was adopted at a regular meeting of
the San Jacinto City Council on January 19, 1993, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this day of January, 1993:
, City Clerk of the City of Hemet, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution No. was adopted at a regular meeting of
the Hemet City Council on January , 1993, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this day of January, 1993:
, the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was adopted at a regular
meeting of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on January , 1993,
by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this day of January, 1993:
ip;-41}
STATE A
-4%,'1(0' 44445.
ND RAt1ONA
SAN JACINTO PLAZA $54-0053
City Man ger Pam Easter and
Member,'of the San Jacinto City Council
Dear Pam and Council Members:
THE FUN HOUSE has recently opened in the San Jacinto Plaza with the
goal to encourage family fun and offer incentives for responsible
behavior. We want to offer young people and their families an
alternative to drugs and alcohol abuse. If we can reach these
young minds early on, with positive reinforcement from their
families, we stand a good chance that they will avoid the kind of
association which leads to destructive behavior.
We recognize however that the City has the enormous task of dealing
with daily crime and consequently does not have the resources for
law enforcement in the drug/alcohol abuse area. The job is
overwhelming but every citizen - every business - every church -
every school must do their part if we are to control the
undesirable element that would take away our country's future
generations.
Please accept the enclosed check for $250.00 as our contribution
towards your law enforcement efforts. We appreciate your efforts
and the efforts of Chief Kozma and his officers.
Sincerely,
7/
Jack Matlock
GAMES :i;'.i,: POOL :I,:f::i; PRIZES
PRIVATE PARTIES BY RESERVATION *.i.:i~ FAMILY FUN
S C;H(ltll **: (HI IR.rFt *c csic rHAR.ITY *:ic:k FI IA1f} P JSFR.S
3.
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Lu Ann Chadwick
Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: January 19, 1993
SUBJECT: SERVICE RECOGNITION AWARD FOR MARY ANN SMITH
RECOMMENDATION : It is recommended that the City Council recognize this
outstanding employee for her five years of service.
BACKGROUND : Mary Ann Smith has served the City of San Jacinto for the past five
years as the account derk in payroll. She was responsible for implementing the
conversion to the HTE payroll system in 1990. She is dedicated to her work and the
City, never leaving a task until she has completed it. She feels uncomfortable about
taking vacation or sick leave, because she hates to inconvenience her fellow
employees with her absence. She is the first to volunteer to assist someone else and
has participated in a number of employee committees. She has been taking dasses
at U.C.R. in fund accounting to further improve her job skills. She is an asset to the
City in every way.
Pwz.oefamation
«WNIElEa�l,, J,y'ia :raffia
and 'LELatEd CT i,n naL a lVL t/Rai e2£ [atEd a tkz gat
to t�Z£/i/EeuzitJ,LJ/
and 0 ELL UELnIIIII/Qlll Or 2ESLdEntS and L7U.iLnEi1E1 and✓it LS Lmr1E'LC1�fkUE that a ULSLULE and
unitiEd Ef O'LtJUE/dEmOnitZatEd. tLo teEE1 tILE UaLLEII LTEaLth uL, 12TOLEC'.f i'LO%2E'LL,, and
I ;c'LEUEnt c'LLm. ; andnI J
VV4£TL/Eai, th£ { Va[LE 1anC�'_jjQSIZ/�o'LGE, Jthe citL£i o(i -EmEt and anc aeLnto,
and tJZE County Oj C LUE iSLQE. aLOn9 wttfi concE'LfEdl �cLtiZEns aZE 1 onioZ�LnC� a
ain/aLgJn to 'tErO✓UE/and. 3to�2 Q'Laft a✓nd 'L£LatEil �2TOLTLEm1 and LEacLE'LS Cn 1Tu✓SLnE11,
icnoOLi, AOUE'LnmEnt, nEL4Ti JmEdia, 2ELL9Loui LniLLLLLLtLOn1, 5.Eni02i, /a'LEnti and 9outn
uTiff dEmonit'CaLE tIZEL'L ^_ommLtmEnt to a G'LEan and gEautL LL UaLLE/ on VV.CL EdnEia /,
,lanua'Ll.� 2?, 1993. l ✓
/'VOpL4i, g E'LEfO'LppE, tAE City Council ofthe p�1t11 of an _Lacinto, (]ati o'Lnia, COE.
bE'LELy 'Loc[aLm t%ZEL'L iuiltzo•JTt and commit tILEL2 TE1Ou'LCE1 tO EnSU'LE Lh8 iucaEi . O a
'Ld LtL- 'LEE valley an LntEnR to iEE tJat E'L Et'Lato'Li o 2a CLL wtll''LECELUE tRE
9 f�� .� � � f9 f
maxLmum pEnatty adowEd L y and anEncou'LL LagEi a^LtizEni to pa'LtLcipatE and
iufipogi thL1 Et10Tt.
c EnT.y atfL, ayoz
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Pamela L. Lee, Deputy City Clerk
DATE: January 19, 1993
SUBJECT: Minutes of Regular Meeting January 5, 1993
RECOIVWIENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 5,
1993, as presented.
/
MINUTES
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL
AND THE CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTH ' +TY
JANUARY 5, 1993
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
The Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order by Mayor
Hafliger at 7:40 P.M. in the Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto,
California.
Present: Councilmembers Ford, Leahy, Solorio, Williams and Mayor Hafliger
Absent: None
A Moment of Silence was observed for Reflection.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Hafliger.
2.0 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
None
3.0 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS
3.1 Prodamation - Law Enforcement Explorer Post 347
Mayor Hafliger made a presentation to the members of Explorer Post 347.
4.0 PUBLIC COMMENTS
Kevin Walker, representing the San Jacinto Chamber of Commerce, commended
the City on their program of graffiti removal. Urged emphasis on prevention with
strict enforcement and community involvement, induding citizen patrols. Chamber
would continue to support the City's efforts.
City Manager Easter advised that Chief Chadwick would be providing an update
on the graffiti removal program later on the agenda.
5.0 CONSENT CALENDAR
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember
Solorio to pull item 5.16 from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Motion
carried on a 5-0 vote.
January 5, 1993
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by Councilmember
Ford to approve the consent calendar as presented, with the exception of item
5.16. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote, except 5.17 being a 4-0-1 vote with Mayor
Hafliger abstaining.
5.1 Minutes of Regular Meeting of December 15, 1992
Approved the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 15, 1992, as
presented.
5.2 Warrant Register
Approved Warrant No. 30963 through 31106 dated December 31, 1992 in
the amount of $490,961.33 and payroll check numbers 21472 through
21578 dated December 18, 1992.
5.3 Treasurer's Report - November 1992
Received and filed.
5.4 Claim - Alexander Vallejo Jr.
Approved the daim of Alexander Vallejo, Jr. in the sum of $1,646.00 as
settlement in full of all claims.
5.5 Second Reading Ordinance No. 971 - Regulating Food Establishments
Waived the reading in full and read by title only, and adopted Ordinance
No. 971, Regulating Food Establishments
CE NO. 971
AN • `II CE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALJFORNIA, a NG RIVERSIDE COUNTY • - RI E No. 492.7 INC WDED
HEREIN AS EXHIBIT "A" TO ALLOW THE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TO REGULATE FOOD EST, SHMENTS AND
RESTAU A TS IN THE CITY AND REPEALING THE PREVIOUS ORDINANCES
RELATED THERETO
5.6 Second Reading Ordinance No. 972- Zoning Ordinance Amendment 7-92
VVaived the reading in full and read by title only, and adopted Ordinance
No. 972, approving the Change of Zone Amendment 7-92.
0'1
CE NO. 972
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA APPROVING ZONING ORDI CE AMENDMENT AMENDING
ORDINANCE 340 OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
2
January 5, 1993
5.7 Second Reading Ordinance No. 973- Trip Reduction Ordinance
Waived the reading in full and read by title only, and adopted Ordinance
No. 973, approving the Trip Reduction Ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO. 973
AN • - • I CE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
RELATING TO • -`LE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION REDUCTION THROUGH
REDUCING MOTOR VEHICLE TRIPS AND MOTOR VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED
5.8 Change Order #1 - Park Hill Tank and Transmission Main
Approved Change No. 1, in the amount of $74,602.98, to the Park Hill
Tank and Transmission Main project contract with Advance Tank.
5.9 Notice of Completion (Ramona Expressway Rehabilitation
Approved and accepted the pavement improvements on Ramona
Expressway between Sanderson Avenue and State Street and
authorized the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion.
5.10 Resolution to Establish a Program That Allows Restricted Use Of
Temporary Off -Site Real Estate Directional Signs
Adopted Resolution No. 2089 to establish program guidelines that would
allow the limited use of Temporary Off -site Directional Real Estate Signs.
RESOLUTION NO. 2089
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CAUF• ` 'IA, OF INTENTION TO ALLOW Y OFF SITE - ESTATE
DIRECTIONAL SIGNS AT SELECTED LOCATIONS AS IDENTIFIED IN EXHIBIT "A"
ATTACHED HERETO
5.11 Records Management & Retention Program
Adopted Resolution No. 2090 establishing a Records Management
Program and Records Retention Schedule and repealing all former
resolutions in conflict.
RESOLUTION NO. 2090
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIF • ' IA, EST 1= SHING POLICIES FOR RECORDS EMENT,
INCLUDING A UNIFORM FILING SYSTEM, A RETENTION SCHEDULE AND A ONE
TIME DISPOSAL OF RECORDS
A
3
January 5, 1993
5.12 Revised Threshold for Determining Timing of Public Improvements
Waived the reading in full and read by title only, and introduced
Ordinance No. 974.
ORDINANCE NO. 974
AN .'I CE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIF* - IA, • NDING C • RS 12 AND 15 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE,
SECTIONS 12.08.020, 12.08.060 AND 15.04.010 RELATED TO TIMING AND
ON OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION
5.13 Tract 23790 Reduce/Release of Bonds (Community Bank - formerly
Friedman Homes)
Location: South of Evans Street, and east of Los Rosas Road with
Specific Plan 1-88
Reduced/Released the following bonds for Tract 23790. Released Bond
#985387S (Street Improvements) in the amount of $160,208.00,
Reduced Bond #985388S (Water Improvements) from $56,615.00 to
$28,308.00, Reduced Bond #985389S (Sewer Improvements) from
$58,659.00 to $29,329.00, and Released Bond #985391S (Monument
Bond) in the amount of $5,500.00.
5.14 Tract 23791 Reduce/Release of Bonds (Community Bank - formerly
Friedman Homes)
Location: South of Evans Street and west of Old Mountain Avenue with
Specific Plan 1-88
Reduced/Released the following bonds for Tract 23791. Reduced Bond
#985392S (Street Improvements) from $209,281.75 to $136,33.00,
Reduced Bond #985393S (Water Improvements) from $74,650.00 to
$26,127.00, Reduced Bond #985394S (Sewer Improvements) from
$71,817.00 to $35,909.00, and Released Bond #985396S (Monument
Bond) in the amount of $5,300.00.
5.15 Amendment to Council Rules and Procedures
Adopted Resolution No. 2091 amending the City Council Rules of
Procedure, and repealing the former rules contained in Resolution No.
2023.
RESOLUTION NO. 2091
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 2023 AND APPROVING AMENDED
RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR COUNCIL MEETINGS AND RELATED FUNCTIONS
AND AC11V11ES
4
January 5, 1993
5.17 Establishment of Policy Regarding Existing Dairy Uses Upon Annexation
Confirmed staff determination that full implementation of existing County
approval subsequent to annexation is not considered enhancement of
dairy uses subject to Ordinance No. 340.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR FOR SEPARATE ACTION:
5.16 Downtown Conceptual Plan Agreement/Keith Suchow
Councilmember Leahy voiced concern that in the past programs had
been undertaken by the City prior to any commitment from the property
owners, who subsequently did not take advantage of them. Suggested
that such a commitment be obtained in writing from the two major
property owners.
Mayor Hafliger explained that the idea of Suchow was to put a plan
together which was conceptual, not a specific overall plan and the City
would do some repaving and resurfacing, which would not necessarily
involve owners of property. However, for completion, agreement from
property owners would be required. This was more limited in scope and
would give an idea of what the area could look like. Cited also, how this
could be used as a tool to sell the idea to property owners.
Community Development Director McNabb advised that the matter had
been previously presented in a study session, at which time it was
advised that the budget had an allocation for repaving Main Street. It
was determined that there was an interest in induding amenities such as
landscaping, parking area, benches and light posts. It was felt that
rather than coming back at a later date and redoing the work, that it
would be more efficient to complete at once time. This would also give
the local businesses a perspective of what it could look like in the future.
Councilmember WIliams felt the plan would demonstrate a commitment
from the City and would help securing commitments from property
owners and show the potential of what could be. Obtained clarification
from staff that the worse case scenario would be the City had a plan to
work with for improvements. Also, merchants had made the request for
the improvements and it would seem to be a good way to secure
consensus for the design.
City Manager Easter advised that the purpose was to have an architect
who could set vision and give input on what to do with the facades, help
the City with design perspective for landscaping and curb cutouts, and
be responsive to the local merchants to make the streets more visually
attractive to shoppers.
5
January 5, 1993
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by
Councilmember Solorio, prior to hiring Keith Suchow to direct staff to
secure a written commitment from the two major property owners for
making improvements to the downtown area. Motion failed on a 2-3 vote
with Councilmembers Ford, Williams and Mayor Hafliger dissenting.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Ford, seconded by
Councilmember Williams to award the contract to Keith Suchow for the
design service related to the development of Main Street area design
standards in an amount not to exceed $5,000.00. Motion carried on a 4-
1 vote with Councilmember Leahy dissenting.
6.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS
6.1 Adoption of 1991 Uniform Building Codes (U.B.C.) and Related Codes
and Standards (continued from 12-15-92)
Fire Chief Chadwick gave a presentation as contained in the staff report
on file with the City Clerk.
The hearing, remaining open from the December 15, 1992, meeting and
there being no speakers wishing to present testimony, Mayor Hafliger
called for the motion.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Ford, seconded by
Councilmember Leahy, to waive the full reading of Ordinance No. 975
and read by title only, and introduce the Ordinance adopting the 1991
Uniform Building Codes (U.B.C.) and Related Codes and Standards, and
continue the Public Hearing to January 19, 1993 to consider a Fee
Resolution to this Ordinance. Motion carried on a 5-0 vote,
INANCE NO. 975
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
NG THE 1991 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE AND ANNUAL SUPPLEMENTS,
THE 1991 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS, THE 1991 UNIFORM
MECHANICAL CODE, THE 1991 UNIFORM PW - NG CODE, THE 1991 UNIFORM
ADNINISTRATIVE CODE, THE 1991 UNIFORM HOUSING CODE, THE 1991
UNIFORM CODE FOR THE =ATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, THE 1991
UNIFORM SIGN CODE, THE 1991 UNIFORM SECURITY CODE, THE 1991
UNIFORM SIMIVIMNG POOL, SPA AND HOT TUB CODE, THE 28TH EDITION OF
THE 1991 ASTM STANDARDS IN BUILDING CODES, INCLUDING APPENDICES
AND ANNUAL PUBLJSHED SUPPLEMENTS OF THE = •VE NOTED C ODES.
THE • ='VE CODES ARE AS ' I - D BY THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
OF BUILDING OFFICIALS, THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLU .= NG
AND MECHANICAL OFFICIALS, AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
I..
6
January 5, 1993
6.2 Adoption of 1991 Uniform Fire Codes (U.F.C.) and Related Codes and
Standards (continued from 12-15-92)
Fire Chief Chadwick made a presentation as contained in the staff report on file with
the City Clerk.
The hearing, remaining open from the December 15, 1992, meeting and
there being no speakers wishing to present testimony, Mayor Hafliger
called for the motion.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Ford, seconded by
Councilmember Solaria, to waive the full reading of Ordinance No. 976
and read by title only, and introduce the Ordinance adopting the 1991
Uniform Fire Codes (U.F.C.) and Related Codes and Standards with
certain amendments, and continue the Public Hearing to January 19,
1993 to consider a Fee Resolution to this Ordinance. Motion carried on
a 5-0 vote.
II'a
CE NO. 976
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF NE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
EST. :4 SHING A FIRE AND SAFETY INSPECTION PROGRAM; EST SHING
CERTAIN FEES; a. • NG THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1991 EDITION, MN
CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, THE UNIFORM FIRE CODES STANDARDS, 1991
EDITION, AND THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION STANDARDS
13, 1991 EDITION, 13-D, 1991 EDITION, AND 13-R, 1991 EDITION; PRESCRIBING
REGULATIONS GOVERNING CONDITIONS HAZARDOUS USES OR OPERATIONS;
EST, : SHING A EU' , OF FIRE PREVENTION, PROVIDING OFFICERS
THEREOF AND DEFINING THEIR - • RS AND DUTIES, AND; REPEALING
ORDI CE No. 917
6.3 Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Buildings Ordinance (continued
from 12-15-92)
Fire Chief Chadwick made a presentation as contained in the staff report
on file with the City Clerk. Advised the next step would be to develop a
mitigation plan, induding time frames for implementation. Staff would
look at options for grants and low interest loans and come back within
six months.
Staff darified for Council that many buildings had been identified based
upon knowledge of when they were built (before 1933), some of which
had been found to contain reinforcement. Many methods were available,
other than boring holes, to determine compliance. Owners would be
notified after the ordinance took effect and inspections would be made.
January 5, 1993
The hearing, remaining open from the December 15, 1992, meeting and
there being no speakers wishing to present testimony, Mayor Hafliger
dosed the public hearing.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by
Councilmember Ford, to waive the full reading of Ordinance No. 977 and
read by title only, and introduce the Ordinance approving the Earthquake
Hazard Reduction in Existing Buildings Ordinance. Motion carried on a
5-0 vote.
CE NO. 977
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ADDING
C •._ R 15.17 TO TITLE 15 OF THE SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL CODE
NG :THQU * 1 ' r REDUCTION IN EXISTING BUILDINGS
6.4 Graffiti Abatement Ordinance (continued from 12-15-92)
Fire Chief Chadwick made a presentation as contained in the staff report
on file with the City Clerk. Advised that the staff and attorneys for Hemet
and San Jacinto were reviewing for consistency with the Government
Code. It would appear a revision of the Beautification Ordinance would
be the appropriate way to secure timely abatement. Staff would bring
back an amendment on January 19, 1993.
Mr. Chadwick also darified the prosecution methods available, citing that
the District Attorney has limitations for prosecution, and lesser offenses
would be handled by the City Attorney or a method developed to secure
collection through small daims. Meetings would be held with the local
judges to assure maximum penalties and restitution by parents of
offending minors. Costs related to prosecution would be better identified
after meeting with the judges. City Attorney Cox felt that most cases
could be solved at a pleading stage.
Noted that Valley Wde was in need of a paint sprayer at a cost of
$1,000, which would be more effective than rolling. Assistance from the
community would be needed and notification would be going out to
encourage reporting of offenses. Citizen patrols would be also assisting
in finding perpetrators. There would be a citizen patrol orientation as
early as Thursday evening. In addition, a press conference would be
held and the school district would assist in distributing flyers emphasizing
the consequences of graffiti, in both spanish and english. Kevin Walker
donated door hangers which would be distributed by the Fire Department
and a reward of $1,000 had been offered for the conviction of offenders
in the incident which occurred downtown last week.
8
January 5, 1993
Council suggested that staff approach prosecution on smaller cases with
the District Attorney on a cumulative basis. Further, urged prosecution
within 45 days, with a policy of educate, abate and prosecute
expeditiously.
Staff advised the news media, including Cable TV had offered support to
publicize the program.
The hearing, remaining open from the December 15, 1992, meeting and
there being no speakers wishing to present testimony, Mayor Hafliger
called for the motion.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Leahy, seconded by
Councilmember Ford, to continue the Public Hearing on the introduction
of a Graffiti Ordinance to the Regular City Council meeting of January
19, 1993, at 7:30 P.M. Motion carried unanimously.
7.0 CITY DEPARTMENTS
7.1 Status Report for Rent Review Study/Mobile Home Parks
Assistant to the City Manager Anderson made a presentation as
contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk.
COUNCIL CONSENSUS to direct Staff to continue to met with mobile
home park owners and tenants to explore the nature of the problem and
to investigate a range of alternatives to bring back before City Council.
7.2 Farmers Home Administration Programs
Assistant to the City Manager Anderson made a presentation advising
that staff had tried to identify those programs the city would benefit from
and would be eligible for, which induded a couple community facilities
loan programs, business and industry guarantees as part of economic
development and some housing improvement loans and grants. A
representative would be invited to explain in more detail the programs.
COUNCIL CONSENSUS to direct staff to follow up on programs of
interest to the City Council.
7.3 Rama Corporation Update
City Manager Easter advised the Public VVorks Director was working with
Rama Corporation and the pumping was an alternative strongly endorsed
by both parties. Staff was still working on negotiating how long the City
would continue to assist and then turn the matter over to Rama for
maintenance and operation. Other issues were dose to being resolved
and staff would report back on status.
9
January 5, 1993
7.4 K-9 Status Funding
Police Chief Kozma reported that the Senior Guild recently donated
$2,000 to replace the retired K-9, and that an additional donation would
be forthcoming from the Hemet Emblem Club. In addition, requests
would be made of the local service dubs to assist and fund raisers would
be conducted. In response to Council, advised that only a portion of
recertification costs were reimbursable from POST and that the total cost
broke down as follows:
Cost of K-9 - up to $6,000
Training $4,500 for 160 initial hours, which had been increased to
200 hours
Cross training for narcotics $4,500 and 200 additional hours
7.5 Budget Allocations and Fee Waivers for Social Service Agencies and
Non -Profit Organizations
Community Development Director McNabb made a presentation as
contained in the staff report on file with the City Clerk. Explained that
the City has mechanisms for assisting agencies within the budget for
special events and also supports organizations with the grant of CDBG
funds. Explained each of the alternatives offered and recommended that
the City adopt a policy of no waiving of fees and those minor events
(non -budgeted) would have to appeal to the Council. A policy would
serve to discourage requests which are devastating to the budget.
A MOTION was made by Councilmember Ford, seconded by
Councilmember Solorio to adopt the first resolution and not one of the
alternates, and adopting a policy of not waiving fees.
Council discussion resulted in the following comments:
1. Possible in kind services.
2. Identify requirements, i.e., financial statements, perhaps
add the wording "In the event the City Council chooses not
to ratify a waiver or reduction, such application shall be
accompanied by the previous three years audited financial
statements."
3. Clarified that the action to not waive fees would not be
retroactive to those already approved. That even budgeted
items were not automatic and still come to council with the
potential financial impact.
4. That the resolution be more specific.
5. Not being locked into an absolute denial, some manner of
appeal.
6. Non-profit certification.
10
January 5, 1993
Councilmembers Ford and Solorio withdrew the motion.
City Attorney Cox supported alternative one which gave the authority to
waive application fees but not restricted funds, with the option to explore
the financial situation and suggested adding a provision that non-profit
provide a service benefit to the community. Voice serious concern about
waiving flood control fees, etc.
COUNCIL CONSENSUS for staff to bring the matter back at the January
19, 1993 meeting with a revised policy.
8.0 MAYOR/ COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS/DISCUSSIONS
8.1 Desert Protection Act
Deputy City Clerk Lee made a presentation as contained in the staff
report on file with the City Clerk.
COUNCIL CONSENSUS to take no position on this matter.
8.2 Norton Air Force Base Defense Finance and Accounting Service Center
City Manager Easter made a presentation as contained in the staff report
on file with the City Clerk.
COUNCIL CONSENSUS to direct staff to come back with a resolution of
support for the Norton Air Force Base site and to pursue outreach in the
community.
Councilmember Leahy commended the recent rescue of a boy. Aso
noted that the San Jacinto Business Association party at Hofmann Park
was a success and commended the Chamber of Commerce on their
recent brochure. Finally, invited the Council to attend the Valley Gang
Task Force meeting on January 14th, 4:00 P.M. at Simpson Center.
Councilmember Williams inquired regarding the status of the Meadowood
Homes problems with blowing sand.
Bob Wilson advised that the college had planted wheat which should be
up shortly and the burning permit was extended and should be cleared in
about 2-3 weeks.
9.0 CLOSED SESSION
None
11
January 5, 1993
10.0 ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, A MOTION was made by Councilmember
Leahy, seconded by Councilmember Ford, to adjourn. Motion carried on a 5-0
vote. The hour of adjournment being 9:50 P.M.
Submitted by
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
Approved
HenryHafliger, Mayor
12
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Laurie Mora, Deputy City Clerk
DATE: January 19, 1993
SUBJECT: Minutes of Special Meeting January 7, 1993
• RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of January 7,
1993, as presented.
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE
CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE
I NDUS"'DIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
JANUARY 7, 1993
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
The Special Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 6:05 P.M. by
Mayor Hafliger at the Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, California.
Present: Councilmembers Leahy, Solorio, Williams and Mayor Hafliger
Absent: Councilmember Ford
2.0 CLOSED SESSION
At the hour of 6:06 P.M. the City Council convened in Closed Session, pursuant
to the following:
2.1 Employee Personnel Hearing - Government Code Section 54759
At the hour of 9:06 P.M. Council reconvened in open session with all members
present, except Councilmember Ford with no action being taken.
3.0 ADJOURNMENT
Council consensus to adjourn to January 8, 1993 at 10:00 A.M. at the Community
Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, California for the purpose of continuing the
Closed Session hearing. The hour of adjournment being 9:07 P.M.
Approved by
Henry Hafliger, Mayor
Submitted by
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Laurie Mora, Deputy City Clerk
DATE: January 19, 1993
SUBJECT: Minutes of Adijoumed Meeting January 8, 1993
RECOMMENDAT1ON: Approve the Minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of January 8,
1993, as presented.
MINUTES
ADJOURNED MEETING
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE
CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
JANUARY 8, 1993
1,0 CALL TO ORDER
The Adjourned Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 10:05 A.M.
by Mayor Hafliger at the Community Center, 625 South Pica, San Jacinto, California.
Present: Councilmembers Leahy, Solorio, Williams and Mayor Hafliger
Absent: Councilmember Ford
2.0 CLOSED SESSION
At the hour of 10:06 P.M. the City Council convened in Closed Session, pursuant
to the following:
2.1 Employee Personnel Hearing - Government Code Section 54759
At the hour of 5:06 P.M. Council reconvened in open session with all members
present, except Councilmember Ford, with no action being taken.
3.0 ADJOURNMENT
Council consensus to adjourn. The hour of adjournment being 5:07 P.M.
Approved by
Submitted by
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
1
Henry Hafliger, Mayor
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Laurie Mora, Deputy City Clerk
DATE: January 19, 1993
SUBJECT: Minutes of Special Meeting January 12, 1993
RECONIVIENDATION: Approve the Minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of January 12,
1993, as presented.
MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
SAN JACINTO CITY COUNCIL AND THE
CITY COUNCIL SITTING AS THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
JANUARY 12, 1993
1.0 CALL TO ORDER
The Special Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council was called to order at 6:50 P.M. by
Mayor Hafliger at the Community Center, 625 South Pico, San Jacinto, California.
Present: Councilmembers Ford, Leahy, Solorio, Wiliams and Mayor Hafliger
Absent: None
2.0 CLOSED SESSION
At the hour of 6:51 P.M. the City Council convened in Closed Session, pursuant
to the following:
2.1 Employee Personnel Hearing - Government Code Section 54759
At the hour of 7:55 P.M. Council reconvened in open session with all members
present and no action being taken. The Closed Session hearing, however would
be continued to a later date, unknown at that time.
3.0 ADJOURNMENT
Council consensus to adjourn. The hour of adjournment being 7:56 P.M.
Approved by
Henry Hafliger, Mayor
Submitted by
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Anna A Vega, Finance Director
Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of Register of Audited Demands
and Payroll Checks
DAl'E: January 15, 1993
RECOMMENDATION
Approve warrant numbers 31107 through 31266 dated January 15, 1993 in the amount of
$52,398.36 and Payroll check numbers 21675 through 21773 dated January 15, 1993 in the
amount of $144,092.28.
SUMMARY
A listing of accounts payable warrants is attached for your review and approval.
Payroll information is available for your review in the Finance Department.
REGISTER OF AUDITED DEMANDS
January 15, 1993
FUND 10 General Fund $46,926.66
FUND 11 Title III-B $37.70
FUND 14 Sewer 7.25
FUND 20 Liability Ins. $4,029.89
FUND 21 Gas Tax $948.41
FUND 24 Measure A $28.42
FUND 25 LLMD $21,358.09
FUND 29 Downtown Water $509.59
FUND 37 CFD No. 3 $1,036.70
FUND 39 Drainage Project $132,882.55
FUND 40 Vehicle Replacement $14,927.01
FUND 47 Water Purveyance $166.54
FUND 50 Water Fund $5,857.92
FUND 65 Trust Fund $164,276.04
FUND 66 Asset Forefeiture $19,832.40
FUND 67 Fire Mitigation $288.00
FUND 96 RDA -San Jacinto $13,178.00
PAYROLL $126,107.19
TOTAL $552,398.36
GLCD12
?--.UDTTEM DEMANDS)
�ITf OF SA� JACINTO
311O7*
311O8*
31109*
31110*
31111*
31112*
31113*
31114*
31115*
31116*
7it117*
31118*
31119*
311Z0*
31121*
31122*
31123*
31124*
31125*
31126*
31127*
31128*
31129*
30*
v +31*
31132*
31133*
31134*
31135*
31136*
31137*
31138*
31139*
3114O*
31141*
31142*
31143*
31144*
31145*
31146*
31147*
31148*
311�9*
31150
31151
31152
31153
31154
�5
156
UNITED CALIFDRHIA �ANK A/C 2O1398
ISSUED TO
PUBLIC EMP^ RET^ SYSTEH
SD~ CA^ GAS
SO^ CA ^ EDISON
SO+ CA~ EDISON
SO~ CA~ GAS
SO, CA~ GAS
SO^ CA. EDISON
ICMA
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
U,S^ POSTMASTER
SO, CA^
8O~ CA^
SO^ CA~
SO, CA^
SO^ CA.
SO^ CA.
GAS
EDISON
GAS
EDISON
GAS
EDISON
THIN LITE CORP~
SO. CA~ EDISON
SO. CA. GAS
ICIS C
SO^ CA, GAS
SO4 CA. EDISON
ALEXANDER VALLEJO JR^
BENJAMIN HARPER
B0X N COMMUNICAT7ONS
S A N. BERN, SHERIFF�S
SO. CA. GAS
SO, CA, EDISON
SO~ CA ^ EDISON
SO^ Co^ GAS
JASON RAM8EY
COUNTY OF RIVERSI[/E
SO, C.A. EDISON
SO. CA^ GAS
�GB COMMERCIAL DEVLP~
SU, CA, EDISON
SO. CA^ GAS
U^S^ POSTMASTER
O.K. ASSOC. lNC.
SO. CA^ EDISON
SO^ CA. GAS
SO, CA^ EDISON
SO. CA^ GAS
BILL RUTLEDGE
RICHARD HIXSON
CHRIS CARLSON .... BUfDOS
DAVID VER PLANK
GLENN TAYLOR
AT & T
ALL PURE CHEMICAL CU,
ALPHA BETA
DESCRIPTION
DATE 1/15/93
RETIREM[NT
�AYMENT COLLECTIONS
PAYHENT CDLLECTION5
P��MENT COLLECTIONS
PAYMEHT CDLLECTIONS
PAYHENT COLLECTIONS
PA�HEHT COLLECTIDNS
DEFERRED �OMP
�ET FAYROLL
POSTAGE~WATER BILLS
PAyHFEN T COLLECTIONS
PAYHENT C0J.ECTIONE)
Pf')YMEHT COLLECTIONS
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
P�YMENT COLLECTIONS
P�Y�EHT COLLE-TT DNS
LIGHTS~�^D^ TRUCK
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
PAYMEHT C0LLE2T1ONS
�EGISTRATIONS/MEH6~ RENEWAL
PAYMEHT COLLECTIONS
PAYMENT COLLECTIDNS
CLAIM SETTLEMENT
REPL. C1<031003
�EWSLETTER
DRIVING COURSE~TOWNSE�
PAYMEHT COLLECTIONS
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
PAYMENT CDLLECTIONS
P���EHT COLLECTIONS
�CTING ANIMAL CONTROL
CSBG ENVIRON. APPL^
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
P�YHENT COLLECTIONS
C�NSTING~£CDN. DEVLP.
PAYMENT COLLECTIONS
P�YMENT COLLECTIONS
POSTA�|��WAlER BILLS
REFUSE �OLLECTIONS
�AyHENT COLLECTIONS
PAYMEHT COLLECTIONS
P�YME�T COLLE�TIONS
PAY�EHT CDLLEIONS
PLANHINC COMMISSIONER
PLANNING CDMMISSIONER
PLANNING COMMISSION�R
"LAiqNIN8 COHMISSIONER
PLAHNINC COMMISSIONER
LONG DISTANCE SERVICE
CHLORINE/SODA~WATER
SR[NKS FOR F^D~ TRAINING
AMOUNT
19~083~85
226~59
606~38
668~43
�35~15
128^�5
382^72
68�^OO
lU6,338^34
983^00
411^32
848^56
258,9l
622,58
288.65
207~51
69^23
1,082^70
1'O23.64
1'O5O^O0
711.75
1/196~73
1,646,00
45~00
337.30
80400
104^11
83,85
1i6.71
66.07
300.00
3O0
105^44
1O9^92
5,185^56
599.40
807^69
900^00
92,468^15
264.65
97B~55
456^66
l,209^69
10O.00
100~0O
1OO~OO
1OO^OO
100^0O
9~33
1'596^67
39,81
C-ITY CF SAN JACINTO
CHECK
31158
31159
3l16O
�1161
31162
31163
31164
31165
31166
31167
31168
31169
31i70
31t71
31172
31173
31174
31175
31176
31177
31178
31179
3118O
31181
31182
31183
31184
31185
31186
311O7
31188
31189
3119O
31191
31192
31193
31194
31195
31196
31197
3.1196
31199
312OO
31201
31202
31203
31204
31�O5
31206
312O7
31200
UNITED A/C 201398
ISSUED TO
AL'S LAWNMOWER SHOP
GRACIELLA ALVAREZ
AMERCIAN HEART ASSC.
�AVE ANDERSON
LOUIS R. ARROYA^ JR^
ARROW PRINTING
B & W PIPE CO.
E^S° & SONS
TODD BAGLEY LANDSCAPE
BANCR0F7, WHITNEY CO.
1'.4EAUMONT CONCRETE CO^
BOB~S LUMBER
BONNEVILLE TRAVEL
BOX N COMMUNICATIONS
C^V°J~P^I^A^
DEPT^ OF JUSTICE
CAR WASH DEPOT
CASTELLANO'S TOWING
CHEROKEI LANDSCAPE
CHEVRON
PHOENIX PROGRMAS INC^
SALLY ROBINSON
MAIN STREET REALTY
COMTRONIX OF HEMET
COMPUTER RESOURCES
THE COUNSELING TEAM
COX & COX
T^L+ CREATES^ INC^
L.N. CURTISS
D&J
DAMON REFERENCE LAB~
DE BROS BLUEPRINTNG
DEFENSE 7"ECHNOLOGY CORP
DEPT^-GENERAL SERVICE
EASTERN MUNI^WATER DlST
EMPIRE OIL
EVANS TIRE CO~
FETN FIRE & EM�RGENCY
OFELIA FIERRO
FEDERAL EXPRESS CO.
FILARSKY & WATT
GENERAL TELEPHGNE CO~
HEMET NEWS
HEMET VALLEY MEDICAL
FUEMET VALLEY PIPE
HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVi:-
HINCKLEY & GCHMITT
HINCKLEY & SCHMITT
HOT SHOTS 1 HOUR PHOTO
HOUSING AUTHORITY
R~ CR.-GORY HOWE CONST^
D-SC�IPTION
DATE 1/15/93
SL�'PLIES & SERVICE -PARKS
EMPL, ot-,:, THE YEAR «92"
HEARTSAVER MANUAL -CPR
�OMPUTER SUPPLIES~REIHB+
JANITO�IAL 8ERVICE
ECD IHS[RTS
SUPPLIES-P+W^
LAB TESTS -WATER
PLAN CA[CKIN6
COPIES PENAL CODE' BOOKS
CON(-.RETE-WATER
PARTS -WATER
AIRFAR[~SOLORIO
HEWSLETTER
CLf^iIM-ROJAS & FORKNER
FINGERPAINT FEES
VEHICLE WASH
TOWING CHARGES-P,D,
LAHDSCAPE MAINT... LLAID
CITY 'V[H1CLES~CAR WASH
REIMB^ WATER/TRASH DEPOSIT
REIMB� WATER/TRASH DEPOSIT
REIMB, WATER/TRASH DEPOSIT
REPAIR RADIOS
SUPPLI[G~P^W.
EMPLOY�E ASST. PROGRAM
LAEGr-iL SERVICES
CRI53 SYSTEM^P^D^
UiliIFURMS-f,D^
LAHDSCAPE�PARK HILL-LLMLI
LABORA7OKY FEES-P,D^
MYLARS�COMM^ DEULP^
SUPSCRIPTION-P~D^
UTILIIES
���LEAD[D FUEL
TIRES REPAIRS
WEEKLY TRAIN1NG~F^D^
REIHB, MILEAGE-C^C^
HAILING~ADM^
CLAIM� ��OUSEL
PHOHE 4SERVICES
LEGf;L �QVERTISING
HEDICAL SERVICE~P"I'.1,
SPBIHKL��� CAPS .... RANCHO SAN JACINTO
LIGHTI#G EQPT~P^D~
DRIN'KING WATER
D�IRAINQ WTR-PD
FILM P�OCESSIN8
SENIgR HOME REPAIR PROG^
REHANG DOOR-P^D^
AMOW�
^
111^81
2,j0^0O
41^61
43~05
19O0~00
666^20
120~46
92^OO
54O~00
339^41
372^58
27^99
144^0O
337^�O
733.89
27+0O
17^5D
35^QO
6/145^00
3G°35
6~O3
6^45
38^41
379 .
138.�,~�
85^00
3/664+00
2355O+1O
944^97
250.00
784,60
11O^31
322^44
48,35
58/557^62
2'511^64
1�558~13
288.00
37~70
22^50
910~O0
3�218°B 4
244.58
2O8+4O
35^56
427^89
50^OO
71+0O
111
5O9
150.wo
GLCD12
OF SAN JACINTO
REGISTE� OF AUDITED DEMANDS PAGE 3
-,
� �CK
`^
312O9
31210
31211
31212
31213
31214
31215
31216
31217
312i8
31219
3122O
31221
31222
31223
3122�
31225
31226
31227
31228
31229
31230
31231
^~�?32
31234
�1235
31236
3123T
31238
31239
31240
31241
31242
31243
31244
31245
31246
31247
31248
31249
�125O
31251
31252
31253
�1254
31255
31256
257
/
� 258
��1259
UNITED CALIF01:NIA BANK A/C 201398 DATE 1/15/93
ISSUED TU
HUBBS STATIONERY
INLAND CHEVROLET
INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT
INTERNATIONAL CONF^
J & M AIR CONDITIONIHG
C~R, JAESCHKE INC.
FLOYD JOHNSTON CONST.
FLOYD JOHNSTON CONST^
KARL'S DUMP TRUCK
LA RUE PAINTING
LAW ENF LEGAL MANUAL
LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY
LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY
LONG BEACH UNIFORMS
LONGS DRUG STORE
LONGS DRUG STORE
MP LANDSCAPE MAINT.
MARMMAN^ ARZYNSKI
MATT CHLOR INC^
MINCO COMPUTERS
MUNICIPAL RESOURCE
NEWPORTWAVE SOFTWARE
OVERNIGHT INDUSTRIAL
PC-S INDUSTR1ES
PACIFIC PHYSICIAN
PACTELL CELLULAR -LA
PAGENET
LARRY PIERCE PLUMBING
POLAR RADIATOR
PRESS~ENTERPRIGE
QUALITY TRANSMISSIDNS
RAMONA BUSINESS MACHlNE
RHEINGANS TRACTOR SERV~
RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINV
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
SAFETY .... KLEEN CORP,
SAN JACINTO MUSEUM ASSN
SEARS~ ROEBUCK & CO~
SHARP BUILDING SUPPLY
SO^ CALIFORNIA EDISON
SO° CALIFDRNIA GAS CO^
8O, CA° CODE EHFORCEMNT
SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL
SOUND ADVISORS
STEVE/S AUTO PARTS
STRIVIDANTS
SYSTEMS SOURCE INC
TAAB�
TAC EXTERMlNATORS
JAMES W. UNLAND & ASSOC
VALLEY AUTO SALVAGE
DE5f �RIPTION
OFFICE GUPPLIES
�EHICL[ REPAIRS
CGLTi MIX
PUBLICATION ... REDVLP,
HEATIH[� DUCT~ADM^
P�RTS~MOWER
ESPLAHADE PROJ^
ESPLA#�DE PROJECT
WEED A�ATEMENT
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
SUBSCRIPTION-9°D^
PSYCHOL�GICAL EXAMS
EHPLOY�E ASSl,^ FROG*
BOGD^
FILM P�QCESS~P^D.
FILM.-P.D.
MAINTE#ANCE--DEC.-LLMD
HOUSEL V CITY
VACUUM REGULATOR -WATER
MEMORY MODUI-E-ADM.
SALES TAX INFO^ SERVICE
BUS^ LIC. CONSULTING
SUPPLIES --ALL. DEPTS^
CABLE LAZERJET--- P^D^
PRE-LEMPL^ PHYSICALS
CELLULAR PHONES
RENT^L RADIO �AGERS
SUPPLIEG.... WATER & C.C.
R�DI�TD�-P~D.
SUBSCRIPTION� & LEGAL ADS
REBUILD TRANS --- DUMP TRU�K
REF�^ BINDING MACHINE
WEED ElATEMEMT
SL���RI�TING
AUTOMAT[D CRIMINAL I.D. SYSTEM
S{�PPLIES
CURAT�R SERVICES
CARSEAT-P^D~
BUILDING SUPPLIES
UTILITIES
UTILITI�S
�EHBERSHIP DUES -CODE ENFORCEMENT
FUEL
�ICROPAONE~0ISPAT CH
VE�ICLE PARTS
SAFETY �HOES~P^W,
GY�TEM "ORK STATIONS --RDA
WATER BILLS & FREI8HT.... WATEA
SPRt)YINC Al' C.C.
��#EX�TION PLANS~71A
;EHICLE ABATEMENT
AMOUNT
'ERA ~94
143^62
317.39
222^29
498~77
727^3O
91'713~55
41'O69^00
5'426^OO
2'657,OO
89~O0
4t6^O0
18O.00
121^7O
543^37
1'25~94
1'505^OO
7O^O0
265,9G
16l.63
2,500°O0
559^53
90^94
7O~00
567.00
1,060.87
17O^5O
78^35
97^24
12,3^O6
884^96
26^O0
510^60
43^79
5�486.00
156,00
1,475,0O
96^96
413.30
5~115^03
399~72
25^0O
7,783^54
26^86
488,41
1OO^OO
7�280^80
1'347~98
43.5O
3+798~70
5O+0()
8LCD12
CITy OF SAN JACINTO
REGISTER GF AUDITED DEMANDS PAGE 4
CHECK
3126O
31261
31262
31263
31264
31265
31266
UNITED CALIPORHI� B�NK A/C 201398
ISSUED TO
VALLEY ELECTRIC
VALLEY TEEN FOUNDATION
VAN WATERS & ROGERS
WASTE MANAGEMENT
WESTERN FARM SERVICE
XEROX CORPORATION
ZUMAR INDUSTRIES. INC^
DESCRIPTION
CIRCUIT -GRAND WELL
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
POTASSIUM -WATER
PORTA POTY`PARK
SR�SS �EED-*OFFMAN
CO�IER #AINT^
STREET SIGNS
DATE 1/15/93
AMOp
,^~
5O7^08
4,776^5O
462^25
49^78
283~62
1,171,39
264~O9
FINAL TOTAL 552,398^36
�
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Laurie Mora, Deputy City Clerk
DATE: January 19, 1993
SUBJECT: Claim - Ramon Ruiz
RECOMMENDATION: Reject the Claim as presented as recommended by the Claims
Adjustor pursuant to Government Code Section 913.
COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT POWERS
INSURANCE AUTHORITY
January 7, 1993
Laurie Mora
Deputy City Clerk
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
P.O. Box 488
San Jacinto, CA 92581
RE: Ramon Ruiz, a minor v. City of San Jacinto
Loss Date : 06/24/92
Our File # : JS 93-15
Dear Ms. Mora:
We are in receipt of the above -captioned claim filed against the City of San Jacinto by
attorney Jeffrey Knoll on behalf of claimant Ramon Ruiz.
We request that you take the action indicated below:
[ X]
[ ]
CLAIM RESECTION: Written rejection of claim by Title of Board in accordance with Government Code Section 913.
LATE CLAM: Do NOT reject claim but RETURN it for failure to file within time limit prescribed in Government Code
Section 911.2. Transmittal NOT to contain "WARNING" required by Section 913, but should advise that the recourse to file
"Application for Leave to File Late Claim" as provided in Government Code Section 911.4. This must be returned within 45
days of the date claim mailed or delivered.
INSUFFICIENT CLAIM: Send notice of insufficiency for failure to comply with Government Code Section 910 and/or 910.2
and/or 910.4 and cite the following specific insufficiencies:
This must be sent within 20 days of your receipt of claim.
AMENDED CLAIM: Reject claim as set forth in first paragraph above, CLAIM REJECTION.
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE LATE CLAIM: Reject the Application under Government Code Section 911.8.
OPERATION OF LAW: Defer any written response pending our further advice.
Please provide us with a copy of any response requested above. If you have any questions,
please contact the CVJPIA office.
Sincerely,
i)r% --
Sc6tt Ellerbrock
Accounting/Claims Specialist
cc: Jim Cox, City Attorney
Cox, Cox & Camper
805 East Florida Avenue
Hemet, CA 92543
73-710 Fred Waring Drive. Suite 200. Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 341-0492 FAX (619) 340-5949
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Laurie Mora, Deputy City Clerk
DATE: January 19, 1993
SUBJECT: Claim - Antonia Rutz Delgado
RECOMMENDAT1ON: Reject the Claim as presented as recommended by the Claims
Adjustor pursuant to Government Code Section 913.
January 7, 1993
Laurie Mora
Deputy City Clerk
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
P.O. Box 488
San Jacinto, CA 92581
RE: Antonia Ruiz Delgado v. City of San Jacinto
Loss Date : 06/24/92
Our File # . JS 93-15
Dear Ms. Mora:
COACHELLA VALLEY JOINT POWERS
INSURANCE AUTHORITY
ii
We are in receipt of the above -captioned claim filed against the City of San Jacinto by
attorney Jeffrey Knoll on behalf of claimant Antonia Ruiz Delgado.
We request that you take the action indicated below:
[ X]
[ I
CLAIM REJECTION: Written rejection of claim by Title of Board in accordance with Government Code Section 913.
LATE CLAIM Do NOT reject claim but RETURN it for failure to file within time limit prescribed in Government Code
Section 911.2. Transmittal NOT to contain "WARNING" required by Section 913, but should advise that the recourse to file
"Application for Leave to File Late Claim" as provided in Government Code Section 911.4. This must be returned within 45
days of the date claim mailed or delivered.
INSUFFICIENT CLAIM Send notice of insufficiency for failure to comply with Government Code Section 910 and/or 910.2
and/or 910.4 and cite the following specific insufficiencies:
This must be sear within 20 days of your receipt of claim.
AML27DFIL CLAM Reject claim as set forth in first paragraph above, CLAIM REJECTION,
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILL LATE CLAIM Reject the Application under Government Code Section 911.8.
OPERATION OF LAW: Defer any written response pending our further advice.
Please provide us with a copy of any response requested above. If you have any questions,
please contact the CVJPIA office.
Sincerely,
. U
Ott Ellerbrock
Accounting/Claims Specialist
cc: Jim Cox, City Attorney
Cox, Cox & Camper
805 East Florida Avenue
Hemet, CA 92543
73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 200, Palm Desert, CA 92260 (619) 341-0492 FAX (619) 340-5949
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: January 19, 1993
SUBJECT: Adoption of Ordinance No. 974, Public Improvements
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 974, waive the reading of
the Ordinance in full and read by title only.
BACKGROUND
On January 5, 1993, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. 974, which amends
Sections 12.08.020, 12.08.060 and 15.04.010 of the Municipal Code, pertaining to the
timing of required public improvements.
ORDINANCE NO. 9 7 4
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS
12 AND 15 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, SECTIONS
12.08.020, 12.08.060 AND 15.04.010 RELATED TO TIMING
AND EXEMPTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
CONSTRUCTION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapters 12 and 15 of the Municipal Code are hereby amended by repealing and
restablishing Sections 12.08.020, 12.08.060 and 15.04.010, as shown on Exhibit "A", attached
hereto and incorporated herein.
Section 2. This ordinance will take effect thirty (30) days from the passage thereof.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same
to be published in a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the County
of Riverside, State of California.
Introduced at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 5th day of January 1993.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council on the
day of 1993 by the following vote.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mayor
A1'I EST
Deputy City Clerk
-1-
CERTIFICA I E
STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. duly adopted by the
City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the day of
1993.
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of
1993.
Deputy City Clerk
-2-
EXHIBIT "A"
ORDINANCE NO.
12.08.020 Required when. In the event an application for a permit to construct any one or
more of the type of improvements described below, prior to the issuance of the permit, the
building official shall be satisfied that the applicant has installed the improvements or posted
the security as set forth in Sections 12.08.030 and 12.08.040 of this chapter:
A. Any improvement, except those determined exempt pursuant to Section
12.08.060 of this chapter, upon a newly created or undeveloped lot.
B. Any improvements, except those determined exempt pursuant to Section
12.08.060 of this chapter that cumulatively, during the past three years, exceed 25 percent
of of the valuation of all improvements on the property as determined by the Building
Official.
C. Any addition of floor area for human use and/or habitation which equals or
exceeds 250 square feet (stairways are treated as one floor level only)
12.08.060 Exemptions. A. Non -habitable accessory buildings 400 square feet or less
on lots 20,000 square feet or less zoned for single family/two family residential use where
one such accessory building does not already exist.
B. Accessory buildings whose valuation do not exceed 25 percent of the valuation
of all improvements on the property as determined by the Building Official on existing
improved lots zoned for agricultural or single family/two family residential use in excess of
20,000 square feet.
C. The Council may from time to time determine by resolution to exempt certain
installations, repairs or maintenance of the nature similar to those improvements hereinafter
described which are determined to be so valuable to the public health, safety or welfare that
they shall be encouraged without possible discouragements of the requirements of Section
12.08.020.
D. The installation, maintenance or repair of the following types of improvements
are determined to be exempt from the requirements of Section 12.08.020A & B: roofs,
electrical sewer or plumbing systems, heating or cooling systems, building insulation, solar
heating, nighttime cooling, and wind power.
E. Projects identified to be exempt pursuant to California and/or Federal laws.
- 3 -
15.04.010 Application requirements. Any person, partnership, joint venture, firm,
association or corporation desiring or intending to build or construct any building or
structure or any addition or alteration which requires a building permit or permits or any
other improvement to the property based upon the standards identified in Section 12.08.020,
shall file a written application with the building inspector of the city together with certain
plans set forth in this section, together with offers of dedication in addition to the minimum
requirements of the city's adopted constructed codes, and shall pay certain fees prior to the
issuance of a building permit. The various fees stated in this section shall be paid in
accordance to the specific amount set forth in a resolution adopted by the City Council, but
in no event less than the fees set forth in Section 15.04.030 of this chapter.
TO:
City of San Jacinto
Staff Report
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
1'1ZOM: Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief/Building Official
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: January 19, 1993
/„/ 7
SUBJECT: Adoption of 1991 Uniform Building Code (U.B.C.)
and Related Codes and Standards
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Ordinance No. 975 which adopts the 1991 Uniform Building Code
(U.B.C.) and related building codes and standards with certain amendments.
BACKGROUND:
Staff will also present to Council a recommended Resolution at the January 19th,
1993, regular City Council meeting which will set the amount of the fees referred
to in this Ordinance. This is the reason the public hearing was continued from
the January 5th, 1993 City Council meeting to the meeting of January 19th, 1993.
The Uniform Building Code (U.B.C.) was first enacted by the International
Conference of Building Officials at the Sixth Annual Business Meeting held in
Phoenix, Arizona, in October of 1927. Revised editions of this code have been
published since that time at approximate three-year intervals. New editions
incorporate changes approved since the last edition. The City adopted the 1988
U.B.C. as Ordinance No. 693 on January 16th, 1990, with certain amendments.
The U.B.C. is designed to be compatible with related publications to provide a
complete set of documents for regulatory use. The U.B.C. covers the fire, life
and structural safety aspects of all buildings and related structures.
The U.B.C. is intended to be one part of a package of model codes including the
Uniform Fire Code (U.F.C.), Uniform Mechanical Code (U.M.C), and the
Uniform Plumbing Code (U.P.C).
ORDINANCE NO. 975
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
ADOPTING THE 1991 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE AND ANNUAL
SUPPLEMENTS, THE 1991 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS, THE
1991 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE, THE 1991 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE,
THE 1991 UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, THE 1991 UNIFORM HOUSING
CODE, THE 1991 UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS
BUILDINGS, THE 1991 UNIFORM SIGN CODE, THE 1991 UNIFORM SECURITY
CODE, THE 1991 UNIFORM SWIMMING POOL, SPA AND HOT TUB CODE, THE
28TH EDITION OF THE 1991 ASTM STANDARDS IN BUILDING CODES,
INCLUDING APPENDICES AND ANNUAL PUBLISHED SUPPLEMENTS OF
THE ABOVE NOTED CODES. THE ABOVE CODES ARE AS ADOPTED BY THE
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS, THE
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL
OFFICIALS, AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
The City Council of the City of San Jacinto does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1
Ordinance No. 918 and Ordinance No. 893, except Section 7, adopting the 1990 National Electrical Code,
are hereby repealed, continuing the prohibition of aluminium wiring within any structures.
SECTION 2
ADOPTION OF CERTAIN CODES
There is hereby adopted by the City Council these certain Codes known as: The Uniform Housing
Code, 1991 Edition as amended by Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations: the Uniform
Building Code Standards including all appendices, 1991 Edition as amended by Title 24 of the
California Code of Regulations; the Uniform Mechanical Code including all appendices, 1991 Edition
as amended by Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations; the Uniform Plumbing Code including
all appendices, 1991 Edition as amended by Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations; the National
Electrical Code, 1990 Edition as amended by Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations; the
Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1991 Edition; the Uniform Sign
Code, 1991 Edition; the Uniform Solar Energy Code, 1991 Edition; and the Uniform Swimming
Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code, 1991 Edition, as amended by Title 24 of the California Code of
Regulations, each as published by the International Conference of Building Officials, International
Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, International Fire Code Institute or the National Fire
Protection Association, with certain amendments, additions, deletions thereto.
SECTION 3
FINDINGS OF FACT FOR REQUIREMENTS MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN THE
STATE BUILDING STANDARDS
The following are the "Findings of Facts" as submitted by the City of San Jacinto for the purpose of
meeting the Health and Safety Code, Section (s) 17958.5 (a) and (b) with regards to local requirements
which are more restrictive than the State Building Standards with respect to climatic, geographical and
topographical conditions.
A. The City of San Jacinto receives relatively low amounts of precipitation, low humidity and high
temperatures. Such climate conditions are conducive to the spread of fire. Normal prevailing
winds in the afternoon often reach 15 to 20 miles per hour.
January 19, 1993 Page 1
ORDINANCE NO. 975
B. Strong winds commonly referred to as Santa Aria Winds have reached speeds up to 60 miles per
hour in the San Jacinto Valley during various months of past years. Damage that can occur
during such winds includes: downed trees, utility poles, utility circuits and lines.
C Within the City limits of San Jacinto there is a a very active earthquake fault called the San Jacinto
Fault. This fault has produced earthquakes in the past which two times severely damaged the
City. There are also other faults in the adjacent areas, including the San Andreas Fault. In the
event of a severe earthquake, these faults present the potential for catastrophic damage including
tire, damage to roadways, and other impairments of emergency apparatus.
D. Within the City limits of San Jacinto there is a major river bed (dry at this time) which divides one
portion of the City from the other. During flooding conditions, emergency access may he
severely impaired if not completely cut off. Severe flooding has occurred several times in the
City with resulting devastating impacts on public safety resources, especially the Fire
Department.
E. Development has occurred and continues to occur in the San Jacinto Valley, including the City, at
a rapid pace. Traffic congestion is becoming a reality and can reduce response times to various
areas of the City. This condition will worsen as development continues.
F. At the present time there is only one tire station to cover the entire City. Annexations continue to
increase the response area of all emergency services. Flash over in new construction may happen
in as little as 4 minutes.
G. The City of San Jacinto has three different water companies servicing the area.
H. The City of San Jacinto presently has and is considering annexation of hillside areas that include
brush, limited access and other potential firefighting problems such as reduced water pressure
and flow.
I. Automatic sprinklers in residential occupancies conserve water in fires and therefore efficiently
use this increasingly valuable and diminishing resource.
J. Studies have shown that losses due to fire in unsprinklered buildings are four times greater than
such losses in sprinklered buildings. (Studies were conducted by the Los Angeles Fire
Department and a private consultant and were called the "Marina Del Rey test").
K Data reveals that no single fire causing three or more fatalities, has occurred in sprinklered
residential structures. The National Fire Protection Association operates the Fire Incident Data
Organization System and has for decades collected data that supports this finding.
L. Automatic fire protection systems are the single greatest means of reducing the severity of
structural fires. Recent studies of wildland fires have also shown the reduced impact of these
fires in sprinklered dwellings as compared to unsprinklered dwellings (research of the Santa
Barbara and Oakland fires). In addition, sprinklered structures in Los Angeles during the riots of
1992 had a much higher survival rate than unsprinklered buildings.
M. Studies of urban/wildland interface fires strongly indicate that combustible roofs significantly
contribute to the high property loss and spread of those tires.
SECTION 4
The Uniform Administrative Code 1991 edition, including the annual supplement as adopted by the
International Conference of Building Officials is hereby adopted as part of the Building Code of the City of
San Jacinto (copies of which are on tile in the office of the City Clerk) with the following modifications:
January 19, 1993 Page 2
ORDINANCE NO. 975
A. The first paragraph of Section 104 (f) is hereby amended as follows:
Moved buildings and temporary buildings - Buildings, structures, and accessories shall not
be moved into this jurisdiction on a permanent basis.
B_ Section 301 (a) is renumbered to 301 (a) 1. Section 301 (a) 2. is hereby created as follows:
No person, firm, or corporation shall excavate, construct, or maintain any structure, or facilities
within the public right of way without first obtaining an excavation and/or encroachment permit, as
well as a public works permit, as applicable.
C. Section 301 (b) 1.B is hereby amended to read as follows:
Fences not over three feet in height. (All walls and fences shall require a permit.)
D. Section 301 (b) is amended as follows:
The fee for each permit shall he as set forth by City Council resolution. In addition to construction
fees, fees described in section 12 shall normally he paid simultaneously with the issuance of a
building permit unless other arrangements are made. The determination of value or valuation under
any of the provisions of these codes shall he made by the Building Official. The value to he used
in computing the building permit and building plan review fees shall he the total value of all
construction work for which the permit is issued as well as all finish work; painting, roofing,
electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, elevators, fire extinguishing systems and any other
permit and equipments. Fees shall be paid as specified for public and private improvements.
E. The first paragraph of Section 303 (d) is hereby amended as follows:
Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of the Technical
Codes shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by
such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit, or if the building or
work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at anytime. Suspension or
abandonment shall he constituted by more than 180 days between documented requests for
inspection. Before such work can he recommenced a new permit shall he first obtained so to do
and the fee therefore shall be one half the amount required for a new permit for such work
provided no changes have been made or will be made in the original plans and specifications for
such work; and provided further that such suspension or abandonment has not exceeded one year.
In order to renew action on a permit after expiration the penmittee shall pay a new full peuuit fee.
Section 304 (c) is hereby amended as follows:
When a plan or other data are required to he submitted by Subsection (c) of Section 302 a plan
review fee shall be paid at the time of submitting plans and specifications for review. Said plan
review fee for buildings or structures shall he 65% of the established building permit fee.
The plan review fees for electrical, mechanical and plumbing work shall be equal to 25% of the
total permit fee for each as set forth by City Council resolution.
The plan review fee for grading work shall he 35% of the grading permit fee.
The plan review fee for energy shall he 15% of the building permit fee.
The plan review fee for public and private improvements shall be as established by City Council
resolution.
Where plans are incomplete or changed so as to require additional plan review an additional plan
review fee shall be charged at the established rate.
January 19, 1993 Page 3
ORDINANCE NO. 975
G. Section 304 (e) 2 is amended as follows:
Fee. An investigation fee in addition to the permit fee shall he collected whether or not a permit is
then or subsequently issued. The investigation fee shall be equal to the amount of the permit fee
required by this Code. The minimum investigation fee shall be the same as the minimum fee set
forth by City Council resolution. The payment of such investigation fee shall not exempt any
person from compliance with all other provisions of either this Code or the Technical Codes nor
from any penalty prescribed by law.
The forth paragraph of Section 305 (h) is amended to read as follows:
To obtain a reinspection the applicant shall file an application therefore in writing upon a form
furnished for that purpose and pay the established reinspection fee in accordance with the current
City Council building fee resolution.
SECTION 5
The Uniform Building Code 1991 Edition including chapters one (except the first paragraph of Section
104 (e)) and two, and including the appendix thereof and including the standards referred to in Section
6001 therein and including the annual supplement as adopted by the International Conference of Building
Officials (copies of which are on file in the office of the City Clerk) is hereby adopted as a part of the
Building Code of the City of San Jacinto with the following modifications:
A. Appendix chapter 53 is hereby deleted.
B. Section 104 (c) second paragraph is hereby amended as follows;
Any change in the use or occupancy of any existing building or structure should comply with
Section 502 of this Code and Section 308 of the Uniform Administrative Code.
C. Section 502 second paragraph is amended as follows:
No change in the character of occupancy of the building shall be made without a Certificate of
Occupancy as required by Section 308 of the uniform Administrative Code. The Building Official
may issue a Certificate of Occupancy pursuant to the intent of the above exception without
certifying that the building complies with all provisions of this Code.
D. Section 2516 (f), shall he amended to read as follows:
Draft stops shall be placed in all stud walls including furred spaces so that maximum dimension
between horizontal framing members is not over 4 feet and in the following locations:
Section 3203, first paragraph is amended to read as follows:
(a) The roof covering on any structure regulated by this Code shall he as specified in table 32-
A and as classified in Section 3204, except it shall he unlawful to install or cause to he
installed, wood -shake or wood -shingle roofs on any building. All roof covering materials
shrill have a fire rating of Class "B" or better, treated in accordance with UBC Standard 32-
7.
EXCEPTION: This Section shall not apply to the re -roofing or remodeling of any building
which presently has wooden shakes or shingles as the sole roof covering on that portion of
the structure considered as the primary building. In these cases, the re -roofing shall be
done with a minimum Class "B" rooting material.
January 19, 1993 Page 4
ORDINANCE NO. 975
(h) Roof coverings on buildings located in a designated fire hazard area as determined by the
Fire Chief shall he rated as Class "A."
F. Section 3802 is deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:
(a) General. An automatic fire extinguishing system shall he installed and maintained in
operable condition in the occupancies and locations as set forth in this Section. For special
provisions on hazardous chemicals and magnesium, and calcium carbide, see Sections
10.501 and Articles 45, 48, 49 and 80 of the Uniform Fire Code.
(b) Where Required.
All New Occupancies. An approved automatic sprinkler system shall be installed and
maintained in all new occupancies regardless of floor area, occupancy type, construction type or
separations. All approved automatic fire sprinkler systems shall conform to the appropriate
National Fire Protection Association Standards 13, 13-D, and 13-R and the San Jacinto Fire
Department Standards and Policies.
EXCEPTION: Group M occupancies which are detached, do not exceed 500 square
feet of total fire area and are located a minimum of ten (10) feet from adjacent buildings and
five (5) feet from property lines.
Existing Occupancies. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed and
maintained throughout all such buildings or structures which legally exist on the date this Section
becomes law, as follows:
(1) Buildings or structures occupied as single family or duplex dwellings and all Group M
occupancies; whenever the building or structure is moved into or within this
jurisdiction or the total floor area, including lofts, mezzanines, basements, cellars and
additional stories is increased by fifty percent (50 %) or more. All increases in floor
area will he cumulative and compared to the legally constructed floor area existing at the
time of adoption of this Section.
(2) No buildings or structures utilized for any other occupancy shall he moved, altered or
enlarged unless action results in compliance with this Section as a new building.
(3) Whenever an existing building or structure, which is not in compliance with this
Section, is destroyed by fire or other calamity, by act of God or by the public enemy to
the extent of forty-nine percent (49%) or less, the building or structure may be restored
without change and the use resumed, without compliance, provided that work or
restoration is begun within one (1) year and diligently pursued to completion.
When destruction exceeds forty-nine percent (49%), the time frame above is not met or
the building or structure is voluntarily razed or, is required by law to be razed, the
structure shall not he restored except in full conformance with this Section as a new
building.
The extent of damage shall he based upon the ratio of the estimated cost of restoration
(to its condition prior to such damage), to the estimated cost of duplicating the entire
structure as it existed. Estimates for this purpose shall be made by or reviewed and
approved by the Building Official and shall he based on the minimum cost of
construction in accordance with the most recent edition of the Building Standards as
published by the International Conference of Building Officials.
(4) Whenever any building or structure has been abandoned, discontinued for use or
vacated for a continuous period of 180 days or more the building or structure prior to
January 19, 1993 Page 5
ORDINANCE NO. 975
(5)
any occupancies or use shall he brought into compliance with this Section as a new
building.
EXCEPTION: Buildings or structures classed as Group R, Divisions 1 or 3 and
Group M that are necessary to Group R, Divisions 1 or 3.
No existing building or structure that experiences a change in use that would change the
occupancy classification shall he occupied or used until it is brought into conformance
with this Section as a new building.
EXCEPTION: Group M occupancies that are necessary to Group R, Division 3 and
legally converted to a Group R, Division 3.
Section 3803 is deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows:
All automatic sprinkler systems shall he supervised by a central station listed by U.L. for receiving
fire alarms.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. Isolated specialty systems such as spray paint booth systems or isolated installations in
closets and storage spaces unless the entire occupancy is also equipped with an automatic
sprinkler system.
7. Residential sprinkler systems for R-1 and R-3 occupancies where the number of sprinkler
heads is less than one hundred (100).
H. Section 7012 of the appendix of the Uniform Building Code is amended by adding new
Subsection (t):
Parking lots within the City of San Jacinto shall comply with the City of San Jacinto Public Works
Standards and Specifications and Ordinance 340. Permit fees for said parking lots shall he in
accordance with Exhibit C.
Subsection (a) of Section 7013 of The Uniform Building Code is amended to read:
Erosion Control - Landscaping.
l . Slopes. The faces of cut and fill slopes shall he prepared and maintained to control erosion
and provide stability. Where cut slopes are not subject to erosion due to erosion -resistant
character of materials, such production may he omitted. Unless otherwise recommended in
the approved soil engineering or engineering geology report, cut and fill slopes shall be
planted in accordance with this Section. The protection for the slopes shall be installed as
soon as practicable and prior to calling for final permit approval.
a. General Requirements. Cut slopes equal to or greater than 5 feet in vertical height
and fill slopes equal to or greater than 3 feet in vertical height shall be planted with
grass or ground cover to protect the slope from erosion and instability. Other
slopes as deemed necessary by the Building Official shall also he planted.
Slopes exceeding 15 feet in vertical height shall be planted with shrubs, spaced at
not more than 10 feet on center; or trees, spaced not to exceed 20 feet on center: or
a combination of shrubs and trees at equivalent spacings, in addition to the grass or
ground cover. The plants selected and planting patterns may be varied upon the
recommendation of a landscape architect or a slope control specialist with approval
of the Building Official. If a species other than those from the recommended list of
plants is selected, a written statement shall be submitted by a landscape architect or
January 19, 1993 Page 6
ORDINANCE NO. 975
slope control specialist certifying the plants suitable for erosion control and slope
stability. This statement must accompany the grading plan at the time of submittal.
b. Landscape and Irrigation Plan Requirements
1. Landscape Plan Requirements.
Landscape Plans shall be submitted for all slopes required to he planted.
The landscape plan may he incorporated as part of the grading plan unless,
in the opinion of the Building Official the plan becomes too obscured to be
effective. A landscape plan shalt include:
(a) A slope planting schedule that provides common and scientific
names and specifications of all plants, number and size of each tree
and scrub and the spacing of plants.
The location of the planting.
Details of the irrigation system. Landscape plans involving more
than four structures shall he prepared and signed by a landscape
architect. This plan shall include the details necessary to complete
the project including scope of work, materials to be used (seed
mixtures, plant species listed by size quantity, fertilizer used and rate
of application), construction methods, maintenance and time table
for project completion.
(b)
(c)
2. Irrigation Plan Requirements.
Except where approved by the Building Official slopes required to he
planted shall he provided with an approved system of irrigation designed to
cover all portions of the slopes and shall be of sufficient clarity to indicate
the extent of work proposed. Specifications for devices, size and type of
pipe, Clow rates and precipitation rates are to he shown on the landscape
plan. An approved backtlow prevention device shall he installed in each
irrigation system which conforms to Chapter 10 of the Uniform Plumbing
Code. If the planting requirements specified in the subsection above are
waived by the Building Official, the requirements specified in this
subsection may be waived.
c. Planting Method.
Planting shall commence as soon as slopes are completed on any portion of the site
and shall provide for rapid short term coverage of the slope as well as long term
permanent coverage. Minimum requirements shall include:
1. Planting Holes. Planting holes shall be excavated twice as wide as the
diameter and 2 inches less than the depth of the root hall of the plant. The
planting holes shall be backfilled with a mixture of native soil, slowly
decomposing organic matter and an appropriate fertilizer.
2. Staking. Each tree shall be staked in order to anchor the root system and to
support the trunk in an upright position. Stake material shall be of adequate
dimension and length to support the tree. Ties used for typing the tree to the
stake shall have a broad surface to minimize rubbing or girdling and have
some elasticity. In lieu of stakes a three wire tie -down system may he used.
January 19, 1993 Page 7
ORDINANCE NO. 975
3. Ground Cover Spacing. Ground covers are to be spaced in such a manner
that 100% coverage of the planted slope will be achieved in as short a time
as possible. Spacing of ground cover shall not exceed 12 inches O.C.
unless acceptable supporting horticultural evidence recommending greater
spacing is furnished to the Building Official.
d. Waiver of Planting Requirements.
Waiver of the Planting and irrigation requirements may be approved by the Building
Director if found to be unreasonable or unnecessary for one of the following
reasons:
1. The erosion resistant character of material composing the slopes make
planting unnecessary.
2. The unavailability of water making irrigation either impossible or
impractical.
3. Slope heights are less than those requiring planting by Section 3, paragraph
(H) l.a.
e. Planting Maintenance. All vegetation planted for erosion control shall be
maintained in a healthy, vigorous condition. Maintenance of planted slopes shall
include watering, weeding and restoration of any plant material that may die.
Slopes that are affected by the future installation of walls, fences, swimming pools
or any other building must be properly replanted upon the completion of subsequent
projects.
g.
Bonding. A bond for all projects involving more than four structures shall be filed
with the City by the developer at the time that the landscaping plan is approved.
Final Planting Inspection. A final planting inspection shall be required for all
building sites requiring planting. For building sites not requiring a performance
bond, the final planting inspection shall be approved prior to the building permit
final inspection. Any required irrigation system and all planting shall be installed at
the time of the final planting inspection. A functional test of the irrigation system
may he required. For building sites requiring a performance bond, slope
certification required by the next subsection shall he approved prior to the building
pet int final inspection. The final planting inspection shall he performed at the end
of the one year bond period.
h. Slope Verification. A site inspections shall be performed by the responsible
landscape architect to assure compliance with the approved plans and to perform a
functional test of the sprinkler system. Said landscape architect shall verify in
writing to the Building Official that the soils, additives, and amendments, weed
control, planting of the slopes and the installation of the irrigation system comply to
the approved plans and to all the provisions of this section. Verification to contain a
statement as to the grow stock vitality.
Landscape and Irrigation Plan/Plan-Checking Fee. Before accepting a set of plans
and specifications for checking, the Fire and Life Safety Department shall collect a
plan checking fee. The amount of the plan checking fee for landscape and
irrigation plan shall be as set forth by City Council resolution.
Landscaping Permit Fees. A fee for each landscaping permit shall be paid to the
Fire and Life Safety Department as set forth by City Council resolution:
January 19, 1993 Page 8
ORDINANCE NO. 975
SECTION 6
All buildings for which permits are issued shall, prior to final inspection, paint with black numbers on a
white reflective background on the front curh face the address of said building. Numbers shall he a
minimum of 4" high.
All new single family dwellings and duplexes with garages shall have an illuminated address attached to
the left side of the front garage wall facing the street, 60" above the driveway surface. The illumination
shall he 110-volt with photocell switching. The address numbers shall he 1" X 4".
The owners of all buildings in the City shall he responsible for installing the address on the mailbox and
on the structure itself. Such numbers shall he a minimum of 3" tall and on a contrasting background.
SECTION 7
Developers Fees. Pursuant to Section 4, certain developers fees are required to he paid. The purpose
of these fees is described in detail below. The minimum fees will he established by City Council
resolution and may he amended from time to time by a resolution of the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto.
A. Water Capital Improvement Fund
For the upgrade and replacement of existing wells, reservoirs, booster systems and distribution
systems of the Water Department.
B. Public Safety Capital Improvement Fund
l . Structures. For the acquisition and construction of public safety related buildings, grounds
and fixtures.
2. Equipment. For the acquisition of capital equipment for public safety purposes including
vehicles, radios, furniture and other equipment with a cost exceeding $150.00.
C. Storm Drain Improvement Fund
For the development of the Master Drainage Plan and other storm drain systems.
D. Traffic Signalization Fund
For the construction of traffic safety improvements such as traffic signals, warning lights, and
signal coordinating equipment.
E. Sewer Connection Fund
For upgrade and replacement of the sewer collection system.
F. Lighting and Landscape District Fund
For the establishment, maintenance, and administration of lighting and landscape maintenance
districts.
SECTION 8
The Police Chief and officers of the Police Department, the City Attorney, the Fire Chief, Fire Prevention
Officer, the Building Official, the Community Development Director, City Planners, building inspectors,
January 79, 1993 Page 9
ORDINANCE NO. 975
code enforcement officers, and all City Officials charged with the issuance of licenses and permits shall
enforce the provisions of this ordinance, and are authorized to issue a citation for violation thereof.
A. No Permits To Be Issued. No permit of any nature shall be issued under the provisions of this
ordinance which is not in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance. Any permit issued
contrary to the provisions of this ordinance shall he void and of no effect.
B. Legal Procedure. Any building or structure erected or maintained, any grading, or any use of
property contrary to the provisions of this ordinance shall be and the same is hereby declared to he
unlawful and a public nuisance and the City Attorney shall immediately commence action or
actions, proceeding or proceedings for the abatement, removal and enjoinment thereof, in the
manner provided by law; and shall take such other steps, and shall apply to such court or courts as
may have jurisdiction to grant such relief as will abate or removal of such building, structure or use
and restrain and enjoin any person from setting up, erecting or maintaining such building or
structure, grading, or using any property contrary to the provisions of this ordinance. It shall he
the right and the duty of every citizen to participate and assist the City officials in the enforcement
of this ordinance.
C. Remedies. All remedies provided for herein shall he cumulative and not exclusive. The conviction
and punishment of any person hereunder shall not relieve such person from the responsibility of
correcting prohibited buildings structures or improvements, nor prevent the enforced correction or
removal thereof.
D. Repeal of Conflicting Ordinances. All former ordinances or parts thereof conflicting or
inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance or of the adopted codes or standards are hereby
repealed.
SECTION 9
PENALTIES
It shall he unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move,
improve, remove, convert or demolish, equip, use, occupy or maintain any building or structure or cause
or permit the same to he done in violation of this code.
Violation of the provisions of this Ordinance or the Uniform Building Code is deemed to he a
misdemeanor in accordance with Government Code Section 36900 (a) punishable by a line not more than
one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or by imprisonment for not more than six (6) months, or by both fine
and imprisonment. A person is guilty of a separate offense each day during which he commits, continues
or pei wits a violation of this Ordinance or the Uniform Building Code.
Violation of this Ordinance is declared to be a public nuisance, and the City Attorney may institute
necessary legal procedures for the abatement, removal or injoinment thereof in the manner provided by
law, or may take such other steps as he or she deems necessary to accommodate these ends. The
application of any penalty shall not be held to prevent the enforced removal of prohibited conditions.
SECTION 10
VALIDITY
The City of San Jacinto hereby declares that should any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this
ordinance or of the adopted codes or standards he declared for any reason invalid, it is the intent of the
City of San Jacinto that it would have passed all other portions of this ordinance independent of the
elimination herefrom of any such portion as may he declared invalid.
January 19, 1993 Page 10
ORDINANCE NO. 975
SECTION 11
DATE OF EFFECT
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its approval as required by law.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to he published in a
newspaper of general circulation and published in the County of Riverside, State of California.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 5th day of January, 1993.
MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 19th day of
January, 1993, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO
I, Maurice Armster. City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a
true copy of Ordinance No. 975 duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular
meeting thereof held the 19th day of January, 1993.
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of January, 1993
January 19, 1993 Page 11
TO:
City of San Jacinto
Staff Report
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief/Building Official
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: January 19, 1993
SUBJECT: Adoption of 1991 Uniform Fire Code (U.F.C.)
and Related Codes and Standards
RECOMMENDATION:
5 .,Q
Adopt Ordinance No. 976 which adopts the 1991 Uniform Fire Code (U.F.C.)
and related fire codes and standards with certain amendments.
BACKGROUND:
Staff will also present to Council a recommended Resolution at the January 19th,
1993, regular City Council meeting which will set the amount of the fees referred
to in this Ordinance. This is the reason the public hearing was continued from
the City Council meeting of January 5th, 1993 to the meeting of January 19th,
1993.
The U.F.C. provides the following kinds of detailed fire -protection requirements
for new construction: water supplies for firefighting; access for fire department
apparatus; fire extinguishing systems; and also, specific standards regarding
hazardous processes and uses, such as flammable liquids, compressed gases.
hazardous materials, etc.
In addition, the Fire Code is intended to be a maintenance code to ensure that
buildings remain safe once built and occupied. The U.F.C. is intended to be one
part of a package of model codes including the Uniform Building Code (U.B.C.),
Uniform Mechanical Code (U.M.C), and the Uniform Plumbing Code (U.P.C).
ORDINANCE NO. 976
"FIRE PROTECTION ORDINANCE"
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
ESTABLISHING A FIRE AND SAFETY INSPECTION PROGRAM;
ESTABLISHING CERTAIN FEES; ADOPTING THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1991
EDITION, WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE
STANDARDS, 1991 EDITION, AND THE NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION
ASSOCIATION STANDARDS 13, 1991 EDITION, 13-D, 1991 EDITION, AND 13-
R, 1991 EDITION; PRESCRIBING REGULATIONS GOVERNING CONDITIONS
HAZARDOUS TO LIFE AND PROPERTY FROM FIRE, HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
OR EXPLOSION; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR
HAZARDOUS USES OR OPERATIONS; ESTABLISHING A BUREAU OF FIRE
PREVENTION, PROVIDING OFFICERS THEREOF AND DEFINING THEIR
POWERS AND DUTIES, AND; REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 917.
The City Council of the City of San Jacinto does ordain as follows:
Section 1
GENERAL PROVISIONS
This Ordinance shall he known and may he cited as the City of San Jacinto Fire Protection Ordinance.
This Ordinance shall be construed and applied to promote its basic purposes and policies which are:
(a) To safeguard to a reasonable degree life and property from the hazards of fire and explosion
arising from the storage, handling and use of hazardous substances, materials and devices.
(h) To safeguard to a reasonable degree life and property from hazardous conditions arising from the
division of land and the use or occupancy of the building or premises.
Section 2
ADMINISTRATION
The City of San Jacinto Fire Chief is authorized and directed to enforce all applicable State fire laws and
the provisions of this Ordinance, and he shall perform such related duties as may he fixed by the City
Manager and/or the City Council, and for such purposes he shall have the power of a peace officer.
Section 3
ADOPTION OF THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE AND N.F.P.A. STANDARDS 13, 13-D
AND 13-R
There is hereby adopted by the City Council for the purpose of prescribing regulations governing
conditions hazardous to life and property from fire or explosion; providing for the issuance of permits and
collection of fees therefore; providing for penalties for violations thereof; collecting necessary fees; that a
certain code known as the Uniform Fire Code published by the Western Fire Chiefs Association and the
International Conference of Building Officials being particularly the 1991 Edition thereof and to include all
appendix thereto, save and except such portions as are hereinafter deleted, modified, or amended by this
Ordinance, the Uniform Fire Standards, 1991 Edition, and the National Fire Protection Association
Standards 13. 1991 Edition, 13-D, 1991 Edition, and 13-R, 1991 Edition, save and except such portions
as are hereinafter deleted. modified or amended by this Ordinance. Not less than three (3) copies of these
codes and standards have been and are now filed in the office of the Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, and
January 19, 1993 Page 1
"Fire Protection Ordinance" - ORDINANCE NO. 976
the same are hereby adopted and incorporated as fully as if set out at length herein, and from the date on
which this Ordinance shall take effect, the provisions thereof shall he controlling within the limits of the
City of San Jacinto.
Definitions:
(a) Wherever the word "jurisdiction" is used in the Uniform Fire Code,
City of San Jacinto.
shall he held to mean the
(b) Whenever the term ""Corporation Council" is used in the Uniform Fire Code, it shall be held to
mean the attorney for the City of San Jacinto.
(c) Wherever the words "chief of the bureau of fire prevention" are used, they shall be held to mean
the "Fire Marshal."
(d) "Nonambulatory Person" means a person who is unable to leave a building unassisted under
emergency conditions. It also includes persons who are unable, or likely to be unable, to
respond physically or mentally to an oral instruction relating to fire danger and, unassisted, take
appropriate action relating to such danger.
Section 4
ESTABLISHMENT AND DUTIES OF THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
The Uniform Fire Code and the regulations set forth in this Ordinance shall be enforced by the Bureau of
Fire Prevention in the Fire Department of the City of San Jacinto which is hereby established and which
shall he operated under the supervision of the Chief of the Fire Department. The Fire Chief of the City of
San Jacinto shall be the Fire Marshal.
The Chief of the Fire Department may detail such members of the Fire Department as inspectors as shall
from time to time he necessary. The Chief of the Fire Department shall recommend to the City Manager
the employment of technical inspectors, who, when such authorization is made, shall he selected through
an examination to determine their fitness for the position. The examination shall he open to members and
nonmembers of the Fire Department, and appointments shall be for an indefinite term with removal only
for cause.
Section 5
FINDINGS OF FACT FOR REQUIREMENTS MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN THE
STATE BUILDING STANDARDS
The following are the "Findings of Facts" as submitted by the City of San Jacinto for the purpose of
meeting the Health and Safety Code, Section (s) 17958.5 (a) and (b) with regards to local requirements
which are more restrictive than the State Building Standards with respect to climatic, geographical and
topographical conditions. In furtherance thereof, the following findings are declared and adopted:
(a) The City of San Jacinto receives relatively low amounts of precipitation, low humidity and high
temperatures. Such climate conditions are conducive to the spread of fire. Normal prevailing
winds in the afternoon often reach 15 to 20 miles per hour.
(b) Strong winds commonly referred to as Santa Ana Winds have reached speeds up to 60 miles per
hour in the San Jacinto Valley during various months of past years. Damage that can occur
during such winds includes: downed trees, utility poles, utility circuits and lines.
(c) Within the City limits of San Jacinto there is a a very active earthquake fault called the San Jacinto.
Fault. This fault has produced earthquakes in the past which two times severely damaged the
City. There are also other faults in the adjacent areas, including the San Andreas Fault. In the
January 19, 1993 Page 2
"Fire Protection Ordinance" - ORDINANCE NO. 976
event of a severe earthquake, these faults present the potential for catastrophic damage including
fire, damage to roadways, and other impairments of emergency apparatus.
(d) Within the City limits of San Jacinto there is a major river hed (dry at this time) which divides one
portion of the City from the other. During flooding conditions, emergency access may be
severely impaired if not completely cut off. Severe flooding has occurred several times in the
City with resulting devastating impacts on public safety resources, especially the Fire
Department.
(e) Development has occurred and continues to occur in the San Jacinto Valley, including the City, at
a rapid pace. Traffic congestion is becoming a reality and can reduce response times to various
areas of the City. This condition will worsen as development continues.
(t) At the present time there is only one fire station to cover the entire City. Annexations continue to
increase the response area of all emergency services. Flash over in new construction may happen
in as little as 4 minutes.
(g) The City of San Jacinto has three different water companies servicing the area.
(h) The City of San Jacinto presently has and is considering annexation of hillside areas that include
brush, limited access and other potential firefighting problems such as reduced water pressure
and flow.
(i} Automatic sprinklers in residential occupancies conserve water in fires and therefore efficiently
use this increasingly valuable and diminishing resource.
(j) Studies have shown that losses due to tire in unsprinklered buildings are four times greater than
such losses in sprinklered buildings. (Studies were conducted by the Los Angeles Fire
Department and a private consultant and were called the "Marina Del Rey test")
(k) Data reveals that no single fire causing three or more fatalities, has occurred in sprinklered
residential structures. The National Fire Protection Association operates the Fire Incident Data
Organization System and has for decades collected data that supports this finding.
(I) Automatic fire protection systems are the single greatest means of reducing the severity of
structural fires. Recent studies of wildland fires have also shown the reduced impact of these
tires in sprinklered dwellings as compared to unsprinklered dwellings (research of the Santa
Barbara and Oakland fires). In addition. sprinklered structures in Los Angeles during the riots of
1992 had a much higher survival rate than unsprinklered buildings.
(m) Studies of urhan/wildland interface fires strongly indicate that combustible roofs significantly
contribute to the high property loss and spread of those fires.
Section 6
FEES AND CHARGES
Fees and charges shall he imposed and collected by the City for new development mitigation, certain fire
prevention services and cost recovery of certain Fire Department services. The amount of such fees and
charges shall he established by City Council resolution.
A Schedule of currently approved fees and charges shall he filed with the City Clerk and shall be available
for public inspection.
January 19, 1993 Page 3
"Fire Protection Ordinance - ORDINANCE NO. 976
Section 7
FINDINGS OF FACT FOR REQUIREMENTS OF FEES AND CHARGES
The San Jacinto Fire Department has duly proposed and made available to the City Council and to the
public, data indicating the estimated cost of providing fire services. Such data is contained within certain
Report entitled FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL - FEES AND
CHARGES (originally dated October 1990, and as revised or updated), which Report is a
matter of public record and was and remains available for public inspection.
New development does and will continue to adversely impact the City's Fire Department, the City Council
finds and determines that unless fees are imposed on new residential, commercial and industrial
development within the City to finance the needed facilities and improvements identified by the City, such
new development will adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of San Jacinto.
The Fire Department mitigation fee collected pursuant to this Ordinance shall be used to finance Public
Facilities as defined in Government Code Section 66000, including" fire facilities, equipment and
improvements which are needed as a result of new development.
A public hearing was held on October 30th, 1990 and November 6th, 1990, concerning Fire Department
fees and charges, at which time the FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL -
FEES AND CHARGES was presented, considered and public comment received thereon.
In imposing and establishing the Fire Department New Development Mitigation Fees as part of this
Ordinance, the City Council does hereby find and declare the following:
(a) The increased development of land within the City of San Jacinto will impact the level of fire
service provided by the City. New annexations and developments create a need to expand fire
protection service, fire station facilities and fire department equipment, and personnel. The need
for such fire department protection improvement results directly from the increase in density in
the City of San Jacinto by the development of land and the construction of residential,
commercial, industrial and mobile home units. The most practical and equitable method of
collecting the funds necessary to provide such public improvements and mitigating the impacts of
growth is to impose a development fee on new construction and new projects with the City of
San Jacinto_
(h) The Public Facilities to he constructed, financed and used by the implementation of these
development mitigation fees are more particularly described in the FIRE DEPARTMENT
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL - FEES AND CHARGES (originally dated
October 1990, and as revised or updated), which Report is a public document.
(c) That further residential development within the City of San Jacinto will require the construction,
staffing and equipping of new fire stations and facilities in order to provide reasonable service
levels and to protect life and property. All as more particularly described in the FIRE
DEPARTMENT REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL - FEES AND CHARGES
(originally dated October 1990, and as revised or updated).
(d) That further commercial and industrial development in the City of San Jacinto will cause
additional risks of fire and other hazards, will create the necessity for additional public facilities
including fire stations, equipment and the increase in staffing in order to provide reasonable
service levels and to protect life and property, as was more particularly described in the FIRE
DEPARTMENT REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL - FEES AND CHARGES
(originally dated October 1990, and as revised or updated).
(e) That the fees imposed by this Ordinance are calculated to best estimate the actual impact of such
new residential, commercial and industrial development as they relate to the provision of
additional fire department public facilities and that such additional public facilities are necessitated
January 19, 1993 Page 4
"Fire Protection Ordinance" - ORDINANCE NO. 976
(c)
to serve such new development as more particularly described in the FIRE DEPARTMENT
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL - FEES AND CHARGES (originally dated
October 1990, and as revised or updated).
Section 8
FIRE AND SAFETY INSPECTION PROGRAM
The Fire Chief shall develop and implement an annual Fire and Safety Inspection Program for all
buildings, other than single family dwellings (R-3 occupancies). The Fire Chief shall make such
inspections of buildings, premises, land uses, and appliances, as may be necessary, for the purpose of
ascertaining and causing to be corrected any condition which would tend to cause fire or contribute to its
spread, or which may he a violation of the provisions of this Ordinance or any State law or regulation
involving fire safety.
Definitions
(a) Initial Fire Prevention and Safety Inspection: The first inspection made by the
San Jacinto Fire Department's Fire Prevention Officer in the FIRE PREVENTION AND
SAFETY PROGRAM will be the Initial Fire Prevention and Safety Inspection. A fee will not be
charged. The objectives of this Initial inspection will be to:
(1) Obtain better life safety conditions by checking fire escapes, fire exits, aisles, halls and
stairs.
(2) Keep fires from starting by eliminating hazards such as electrical, had housekeeping,
and improper storage of hazardous materials.
(3) Check the maintenance of fire protection equipment by inspecting and testing, if
necessary, fire extinguishers, fire sprinklers, fire standpipes, fire detection and alarm
devices, and fire hydrants.
(4) Help owner or occupant to maintain better life and fire safety conditions by giving
advice and suggestions, educating, and encouraging a "Year-round Fire Prevention and
Protection Program."
(5) Assemble facts concerning the owner/occupant and the building and its contents by
starting a Fire Department file containing the following information: twenty-four hour
emergency contacts; building construction type; building contents; needed fire flow;
exposures and other hazards; other information useful in fighting and investigating a fire
in the building should it occur.
(b) Annual Fire Prevention and Safety Inspection: The San Jacinto Fire Department
will inspect all occupancies, other than single family dwellings (R-3 occupancies), on an annual
basis after the Initial Inspection, This Annual Inspection will help the owner or occupant identify
and correct all possible conditions which might start or contribute to a fire. To promote an
incentive for good fire safety, a fee will not he charged for this inspection. In order to help the
owner or occupant correct any possible violations before the Annual Inspection, the Fire
Department will send out a self -inspection checklist prior to the Annual Inspection. Some "B"
occupancies may be given the option of self -inspection, in which cases the Fire Department will
only inspect the occupancy when requested.
Follow-up Inspection: Follow-up Inspections are made by the San Jacinto Fire
Department after a specified time to deteuuine if all serious violations have been corrected or
resolved by the owner or occupant. Follow-up Inspections will not he made for "minor"
violations. A fee will not he assessed for Follow-up inspections. If violations have not been
January 19, 1993 Page 5
"Fire Protection Ordinance" - ORDINANCE NO. 976
corrected or resolved by the Follow-up Inspection, a Pre -Citation Letter will he issued and a date
set for a Non -Compliance Inspection.
(d) Non -Compliance Inspection: If an inspection is necessary after a Follow-up Inspection
because the owner or occupant has not corrected all fire violations within a specified time limit, a
Non -Compliance Inspection will he made after a short specified time limit as stated in the
Pre -Citation Letter. In all cases a fee will he assessed according to the Fee Schedule for a Non -
Compliance Inspection. If violations have still not been corrected or resolved, a Citation will be
issued and a Court appearance date set. At the time of, but no later than thirty (30) days after a
Non -Compliance Inspection is made pursuant to this Program, the person who owns, operates,
or is in possession of the building, premises, land uses, or appliances at the time that they are
inspected shall pay the applicable fee according to the Fee Schedule.
Citation: The Fire Prevention Bureau shall be responsible for the enforcement of laws and
regulations for the safeguarding, to a reasonable degree, of life and property from the hazards of
fire and explosion and from conditions hazardous to life and property. It is the intent of the Fire
Department to achieve compliance by traditional means of inspection, notification, granting of
reasonable time to comply and re -inspection. A "citation" shall be used only after all
reasonable means to gain compliance have failed or, with proper justification, at the discretion
of the Fire Chief. Only those Fire Department members specifically designated by the Fire Chief
may issue citations.
(e)
Section 9
ESTABLISHMENT OF LIMITS OF DISTRICTS IN WHICH THE SOURCE OF
FLAMMABLE OR COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS IN OUTSIDE ABOVEGROUND
TANKS IS PROHIBITED
The limits referred to in Section 79.501 of the Uniform Fire Code in which the storage of flammable or;
combustible liquids is restricted are hereby established as follows: Installations of aboveground flammable'
or combustible liquids storage tanks shall be permitted inside the City in the M-1 zone with approval of the
Fire Chief and may be permitted in some C-M or commercial zones with special permission of the Fire
Chief.
The City of San Jacinto adopts the Riverside County Fire Chiefs "Standard For Dispensing Flammable
and Combustible Liquids from Aboveground Tanks." All aboveground tanks shall meet the requirements
in the Uniform Fire Code and the County Standard for aboveground tanks.
Section 10
ESTABLISHMENT OF LIMITS IN WHICH THE STORAGE OF LIQUEFIED
PETROLEUM GASES IS TO BE RESTRICTED
The limits referred to in Section 82.104 of the Uniform Fire Code, in which storage of liquefied petroleum
gas is restricted, are hereby established as follows: All zones except areas of the M-I zone which are
more than 500 feet from a different zoning designation.
Section 11
ESTABLISHMENT OF LIMITED OF DISTRICTS IN WHICH STORAGE OF
EXPLOSIVES AND BLASTING AGENTS IS TO BE PROHIBITED
The limits referred to in Section 77.106 (h) of the Uniform Fire Code, in which storage of explosives and
blasting agents is prohibited, are hereby established as follows: All zones except areas of IvI-1 zone
which are more than 500 feet from a different zoning designation.
January 19, 1993 Page 6
"Fire Protection Ordinance" - ORDINANCE NO. 976
Section 12
AMENDMENTS MADE TO THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE (1991 EDITION)
The Uniform Fire Code (1991 Edition) is amended and changed in the
following respects:
Article 2, Division II of the UFC is amended by adding Section 2.208 and 2.209
as follows:
Cost Recovery
Section 2.208.
(a) Fire Suppression, investigation and rescue or emergency medical costs are recoverable in
accordance with California Health and Safety Code Sections 13009(a) and 13009.1.
(b) Any person who negligently or intentionally, or in violation of law, causes an emergency
response, including but not limited to, a traffic accident or spill of toxic or flammable fluids or
chemicals, is liable for the costs of securing such emergency, including those costs set out in
California Health and Safety Code Section 13004.6, and as provided by Government Code
Section 53140, et seq. Any expense incurred by the Fire Department for securing such an
emergency situation shall constitute a debt of such person and shall he collectible by the public
agency in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under contract, expressed or implied.
Current recovery costs are outlined in Exhibit D to this Ordinance.
New Development Mitigation
Section 2.209.
(a) All new residential development shall he assessed a fire department mitigation impact fee, either
as a one time fee or as part of a Community Facilities District Assessment.
(b) All new commercial and industrial shall he assessed a fire department mitigation impact fee,
either as a one time fee or as part of a Community Facilities District Assessment.
UFC 2.304 is amended by adding (c) as follows:
(c) San Jacinto Fire Department, Standards for Fire Prevention. The standards
as published by the San Jacinto Fire Department, Fire Prevention Bureau, are intended for use as
a guide in the design, fabrication, installation, testing and use of equipment and other items
regulated by this code.
UFC Article 4 is amended by adding the following new sections:
UFC Section 4.109 Plans Approved
Except as otherwise determined by the Chief, plans submitted in support of an application for a building
permit to construct buildings for occupancies classified as A, E, H, or I, as defined in the 1991 Edition of
the Unifouu Fire Code, shall he reviewed by the Fire Department.
UFC Section 4.110 Posting and Inspection
(a) No portion of any equipment requiring a permit under this code, intended to he covered by earth
or by enclosure within permanent portions of a building or structure, shall he enclosed until
inspected and approved by the Chief. An inspection shall he requested prior to the covering or
January 19, 1993 Page 7
"Fire Protection Ordinance" - ORDINANCE NO. 976
enclosing of any such equipment. Such requests shall be made not less than 24 hours prior to the
estimated time of inspection, and in no case later than 4:O0p.m. on the last working day prior to
the requested date of inspection. Such installation shall not be covered until after it has been
inspected by an authorized person.
(h) When construction or installation requiring a permit under this code is covered or concealed
without first having been inspected, the Chief may require, by written notice, that such work
shall he exposed for inspection. The work of exposing and recovering shall not entail any
expense to the Fire Department. Whenever any construction or installation work is being
performed in violation of the plans and specifications as approved by the chief, a written notice
shall be issued to the responsible party to stop work on that portion of the work which is in
violation. The notice shall state the nature of the violation, and no work shall be done on that
portion until the violation has been corrected.
UFC Section 4.111 Sale or Delivery Without Permit
No person shall sell, deliver or cause to be delivered any commodity to any person not in possession of a
valid permit when such permit is required by the provisions of this code.
UFC Section 4.112 Permit Fees Required
Any permit or certificate issued under this code is hereby subject to the payment of an annual fee in an
amount which may he amended from time -to -time by resolution of the City Council.
UFC Section 10.301 is hereby amended by the addition of (c):
(c) Illuminated Directory. All condominiums, apartment complexes, town houses, and
mobile home parks shall have installed, and maintained, at points of entry, an illuminated
directory consisting of a plot plan showing private drives, access roads, and building locations.
This directory shall also include the name of the complex; a reference point on the plot plan
indicating the location of the directory; and a North direction indicator. Drawings showing the
above including size, materials, electrical components and wiring and location of installation shall
be submitted through the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval.
UFC Section 10.301 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(a) General. All new commercial and/or manufacturing buildings constructed after the effective
date of this section and all existing commercial and/or manufacturing building which undergo
remodeling in excess of $1,000.00 after the effective date of this section shall he provided with a
master key Knox Box at a location approved by the Fire Department. Such box shall he provided
with master keys necessary for access to all portions of the premises. Such box and keys shall be
issued prior to occupancy and/or final inspection.
(b) Buildings with Elevators. All buildings equipped with elevators shall he provided with a
master key Knox Box as in (a) above.
(c) Buildings with fire alarm systems or fire sprinkler systems. Any building
other than a residential building of less than six (6) units which has a fire alarm system or other
fire protection system shall provide a secure Knox Box installed in a location accessible to the
Fire Department. This box shall contain keys to tire alarm control panels and other keys
necessary to operate or service fire alarm control panels and other keys necessary to operate or
service fire protection systems.
EXCEPTION: Residential buildings of less than six (6) units.
January 19, 1993 Page 8
"Fire Protection Ordinance" - ORDINANCE NO. 976
(d) Buildings with hazardous materials. Cabinet style Knox Box vaults shall he used
when any building has any hazardous material on site on in the building. This vault shall contain
keys for entry to the building, hazardous material information, MSDS data sheets, site plans,
floor plans, current inventories and any other pertinent chemical information.
UFC Article 10 is hereby amended by adding new Section 10.306 as follows:
Gates
Section 10.306.
(a) All electrically operated gates shall have a manual override to he approved by the Fire
Department.
(h) Gates must be maintained in good working order.
(c) An approved key switch device shall he provided for Fire Department access.
(d) All gates must conform to the following dimensions:
(1) Rolling gates. Shall have not less than 20 feet unobstructed width in the open
position.
(2) Lift gates. When two gates are on opposite sides of an entrance, they shall have not
less than 20 feet of unobstructed width in the open position. When two are used and are
on the driver's side of each lane, they must have 14 feet unobstructed width with the
gate in the open position.
(3)
Swinging gates. Shall have not less than 20 feet of unobstructed width in open
position. This may he done with a 14 foot swinging gate and a 6 foot manually
openable gate.
UFC Section 10.507 is deleted in its entirety and new UFC 10.507 is added as
follows:
(a) General. An automatic tire extinguishing system shall he installed and maintained in operable
condition in the occupancies and locations as set forth in this Section. For special provisions on
hazardous chemicals and magnesium, and calcium carbide, see Sections 10.501 and Articles 45,
48, 49 and 80 of the Uniform Fire Code.
(h) Where Required.
All New Occupancies. An approved automatic sprinkler system shall he installed and maintained in
all new occupancies regardless of floor area, occupancy type, construction type or separations. All
approved automatic fire sprinkler systems shall conform to the appropriate National Fire Protection
Association Standards 13, 13-D, and 13-R and the San Jacinto Fire Department Standards and Policies.
EXCEPTIONS: Group M occupancies which are detached, do not exceed 500 square feet of
total fire area and are located a minimum of ten (10) feet from adjacent buildings and five (5) feet
from property lines.
Existing Occupancies. An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall he installed and
maintained throughout all such buildings or structures which legally exist on the date this Section becomes
law, as follows:
January 19, 1993 Page 9
"Fire Protection Ordinance" - ORDINANCE NO. 976
(1)
Buildings or structures occupied as single family or duplex dwellings and all Group M
occupancies; whenever the building or structure is moved into or within this
jurisdiction or the total floor area, including lofts, mezzanines, basements, cellars and
additional stories is increased by fifty percent (50 %) or more. All increases in floor
area will he cumulative and compared to the legally constructed floor area existing at the
time of adoption of this Section.
(2) No buildings or structures utilized for any other occupancy shall be moved, altered or
enlarged unless action results in compliance with this Section as a new building.
(3) Whenever an existing building or structure, which is not in compliance with this
Section, is destroyed by fire or other calamity, by act of God or by the public enemy to
the extent of forty-nine percent (49%) or less, the building or structure may be restored
without change and the use resumed, without compliance, provided that work or
restoration is begun within one (1) year and diligently pursued to completion.
When destruction exceeds forty-nine percent (49%), the time frame above is not met or
the building or structure is voluntarily razed or, is required by law to he razed, the
structure shall not he restored except in full conformance with this Section as a new
building.
The extent of damage shall be based upon the ratio of the estimated cost of restoration
(to its condition prior to such damage), to the estimated cost of duplicating the entire
structure as it existed. Estimates for this purpose shall be made by or reviewed and
approved by the Building Official and shall be based on the minimum cost of
construction in accordance with the most recent edition of the Building Standards as
published by the International Conference of Building Officials.
(4) Whenever any building or structure has been abandoned, discontinued for use or
vacated fora continuous period of 180 days or more the building or structure prior to
any occupancies or use shall be brought into compliance with this Section as a new
building.
EXCEPTION: Buildings or structures classed as Group R, Divisions 1 or 3 and
Group M that are necessary to Group R, Divisions 1 or 3.
(5) No existing building or structure that experiences a change in use that would change the
occupancy classification shall be occupied or used until it is brought into conformance
with this Section as a new building.
EXCEPTION: Group M occupancies that are necessary to Group R, Division 3 and
legally converted to a Group R, Division 3.
UFC Article 11 is hereby amended by adding new Section 11.305 as follows:
Vehicles Leaking Gasoline or Other Hazardous Material.
UFC Section 11.305
When any vehicle is leaking gasoline or other hazardous material and it is practical to stop such leaking,
and in the opinion of the Chief or his authorized representative, it created a fire or safety hazard as defined
in this code, the Chief or his authorized representative may order the removal of the vehicle from a public
roadway or private property. Vehicle is to be stored in a safe manner in an approved police impound lot.
at the sole expense of the owner.
January 19, 1993 Page 10
"Fire Protection Ordinance" ORDINANCE NO. 976
UFC Section 25.116 (c), 11 is hereby amended to read as follows:
11. Candles held in person's hands are especially dangerous and shall not he permitted. Battery
operated simulated candles are available and may be used.
UFC Section 78.202 is hereby revised with the addition of a new second
paragraph:
The Chief shall seize, take, remove or cause to be removed at the expense of the owner all stocks of
fireworks offered or exposed for sale, stored or held in violation of this Article.
Section 13
APPEALS
Whenever the Fire Chief disapproves an application or refuses to grant a permit applied for, or when it is
claimed that the provisions of the UFC or this Ordinance do not apply or that the true intent and meaning
of the UFC or this Ordinance have been misconstrued or wrongly interpreted, the applicant may appeal the
decision of the Fire chief to the City Manager within 30 days from the date of the decision appealed. Any
person who is dissatisfied or adversely affected, or unduly financially burdened with any decision or
ruling of the City Manager under the provisions of this Ordinance may appeal to the City Council within
thirty (30) days from the date of the City Manager's decision. The City Council shall have the power to
grant or deny such an appeal. The appeal to the City Council shall he made by filing with the City Clerk
the intention to appeal the decision or ruling by the City Manager.
Section 14
NEW MATERIALS, PROCESSES OR OCCUPANCIES WHICH MAY REQUIRE
PERMITS
The City Manager, Building Official, and the Fire Chief shall act as a committee to determine and specify,
after giving affected persons an opportunity to he heard, any new materials, processes or occupancies for
which permits are required in addition to those now enumerated in the UBC.
Section 15
ISSUANCE OF CITATIONS BY DESIGNATED OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
The Fire Prevention Bureau shall he responsible for the enforcement of laws and regulations for the
safeguarding, to a reasonable degree, of life and property from the hazards of fire and explosion and from
conditions hazardous to life and property. It is the intent of the Fire Department to achieve, compliance by
traditional means of inspection, notification, granting of reasonable time to comply and reinspection. A
"citation" shall he used only after all reasonable means to gain compliance have failed or, with proper
justification, at the discretion of the Fire Chief.
Officers and employees of the City of San Jacinto who have discretionary duty to enforce a statute or
ordinance may, pursuant to Chapter 1.12, ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY, San Jacinto Municipal Code
and subject to the provision hereof, arrest a person without a warrant whenever any such officer or
employee has reasonable cause to believe that the person to he arrested has committed a misdemeanor in
the officer's or employee's presence which he or she has the discretionary duty to enforce, and to issue a
notice to appear and to release such person on his or her written promise to appear in court, pursuant to
California State law. No officer or employee shall he allowed by his or her supervisor to exercise the
arrest and citation authority herein conferred, unless such officer or employee is within a classification of
City officers and employees designated by resolution of the City Council to exercise such arrest and
citation authority as to specified misdemeanor violations.
January 19, 1993 Page 11
"Fire Protection Ordinance" - ORDINANCE NO. 976
Section 16
RIGHT OF ENTRY
Whenever necessary to make an inspection to enforce any of the provisions of this Ordinance, or wherever
the Fire Marshal or any fire enforcement officer has reasonable cause to believe that here exists in any
building or upon any premises any condition or violation of this Ordinance, the Fire Marshal or his
authorized representative may enter such building or premises at all reasonable times to inspect the same or
to perform any duty imposed upon the fire official by this Ordinance; provided that if such building or
premises he occupied, he shall first make a reasonable effort to locate the owner or other persons having
charge or control of the building or premises and request entry. If such entry is refused, the fire officer or
his authorized representative shall have recourse to every remedy provided by law to secure entry.
Section 17
VIOLATION
Violation of the provisions of this Ordinance or the Uniform Fire Code is deemed to be a misdemeanor in
accordance with Government Code Section 36900 (a) punishable by a fine not more than one thousand
dollars ($1,000.00) or by imprisonment for not more than six (6) months, or by both fine and
imprisonment. A person is guilty of a separate offense each day during which he commits, continues or
permits a violation of this Ordinance or the Uniform Fire Code.
Violation of this Ordinance is declared to he a public nuisance, and the City Attorney may institute
necessary legal procedures for the abatement, removal or injoinment thereof in the manner provided by
law, or may take such other steps as he or she deems necessary to accommodate these ends.
The application of any penalty shall not he held to prevent the enforced removal of prohibited conditions.
Section 18
REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES
Ordinance Number 917 is hereby repealed.
Section 19
VALIDITY
The San Jacinto City Council hereby declares that should any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this
Ordinance or of the UFC Code or Standards hereby adopted he declared for any reason to he invalid, it is
the intent of the City Council that it would have passed all other portions of this Ordinance independent of
the elimination here from of any such portion as may be declared invalid.
Section 20
DATE OF EFFECT
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its approval as required by law.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in a
newspaper of general circulation and published in the County of Riverside, State of California.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 5th day of January, 1993.
MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 19th day of
January, 1993 by the following vote:
AYES:
January 19, 1993 Page 12
"Fire Protection Ordinance" - ORDINANCE NO. 976
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
M a y o r
City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN JACINTO
I, Maurice Armster, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a
true copy of Ordinance No. 976 duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular
meeting thereof held the 19th day of January, 1993.
1993.
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of January
City Clerk
January 19, 1993 Page 13
TO:
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
Staff Report
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief/Building Official /2C
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: January 19, 1993
r/u1
SUBJECT: "Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing
Buildings" Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Ordinance No. 977 regarding earthquake hazard reduction in existing
buildings, especially as it relates to unreinforced masonry buildings.
BACKGROUND:
This ordinance addresses the unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings in the City
of San Jacinto. The provisions of this ordinance are intended as minimum
standards for structural seismic resistance established primarily to reduce the risk
of life loss or injury. The ordinance also provides systematic procedures and
standards for the identification and classification of unreinforced masonry
bearing wall buildings based on their present use. Priorities, time periods and
standards are also established under which these buildings are required to be
structurally analyzed and anchored.
Staff will be looking at several jurisdictions who have successfully mitigated their
unreinforced masonry buildings. After this research, staff will be back to the
Council in the next six months with some proposals to fund this program.
ORDINANCE NO. 977
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO ADDING CHAPTER 15.17 TO TITLE
15 OF THE SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING
EARTHQUAKE HAZARD REDUCTION IN EXISTING BUILDINGS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
"CHAPTER 15.17"
EARTHQUAKE HAZARD REDUCTION IN
EXISTING BUILDINGS
NOTE: Code reference - 1991 Uniform Building Code (U.B.C.).
Sections:
15.17.010 Title
15.17.020 Purpose
15.17.030 Scope
15.17.040 Definitions
15.17.050 Rating Classifications
15.17.060 General REquirements
15.17.070 Administration
15.17.080 Violations prohibited - penalties
15.17.090 Analysis and design
15.17.100 Materials of construction
January 19. 1993 Page 1
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
15.17.010 TITLE
This chapter shall be known and referred to as the "earthquake hazard reduction code of the City of
San Jacinto."
15.17.020 PURPOSE
The purpose of this chapter is to promote public safety and welfare by reducing the risk of death or
injury that may result from the effects of earthquakes on unreinforced masonry bearing wall
buildings constructed prior to 1934 (the adoption date of the Building Code requiring earthquake
resistant design of buildings). Such buildings have been widely recognized for sustaining life -
hazardous damage, including partial or complete collapse during moderate to strong earthquakes.
The provisions of this chapter are intended as minimum standards for structural seismic resistance
established primarily to reduce the risk of life loss or injury. Compliance with these standards will
not necessarily prevent loss of life or injury or prevent earthquake damage to rehabilitated
buildings. This chapter does not require alteration of existing electrical, plumbing, mechanical or
fire safety systems unless they constitute a hazard to life or property.
This chapter provides systematic procedures and standards for identification and classification of
unreinforced masonry hearing wall buildings based on their present use. Priorities, time periods
and standards are also established under which these buildings are required to be structurally
analyzed and anchored. Where the analysis finds deficiencies, this chapter requires the building to
be strengthened or demolished.
Qualified Historical Buildings shall comply with the State Historical Building Code (SHBC)
established under Part 8, Title 24 of the California Administrative Code.
15.17.030 SCOPE
The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all buildings constructed or under construction prior to
October 6, 1933 (adoption date of local earthquake resistant code requirements), or for which a
building permit was issued prior to October 6, 1933, which on the effective date of this ordinance
have unreinforced masonry bearing walls as defined herein or any other building found to have
unreinforced masonry bearing walls.
EXCEPTION: This division shall not apply to detached one or two family dwellings and detached
apartment houses containing less than 5 dwelling units and used solely for residential purposes.
15.17.040 DEFINITIONS
For purposes of this chapter, the applicable definitions in Sections 2302 and 2312 of the Uniform
Building Code shall apply:
ESSENTIAL BUILDING: Any building housing a hospital or other medical facility having
surgery or emergency treatment areas; fire or police station; municipal government disaster
operation and communication centers.
January 19, 1993 Page 2
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
HIGH RISK BUILDING: Any building, not classified as an essential building, having an
occupant load of 100 or more, as determined by Section 3302 (a) U.B.C.
EXCEPTION: A high risk building shall not include the following:
1. Any building having exterior walls braced with masonry crosswalks or wood frame
crosswalks spaced less than 40 feet apart in each story. Crosswalks shall be full story
height with a minimum length of 1 1/2 times the story height.
2. Any building used for its intended purpose, as determined by the building official, for less
than 20 hours per week.
LOW RISK BUILDING: Any building, not classified as an essential building, having an occupant
load of less than 20 occupants as determined by Section 3302(a) U.B.C.
MEDIUM RISK BUILDING: Any building, not classified as a high risk building or an essential
building, having an occupant load of 20 occupants or more as determined by Section 3302(a)
U.B.C.
UNREINFORCED MASONRY BEARING WALL: A masonry wall having all of the following
characteristics:
1. Provides the vertical support for a floor or roof.
2. The total superimposed load is over 100 pounds per linear foot.
3. The area of reinforcing steel is less than 50 percent of that required by Section 2407(h)
U.B.C., 1991 Edition.
15.17.050 RATING CLASSIFICATION
The rating classifications shown in Table A are hereby established and each huilding within the
scope of this chapter shall he placed in one such rating classification by the building official. The
total occupant load of the entire building as determined by Section 3302(a) shall be used to
determined the rating classification.
EXCEPTION: For the purpose of this chapter, portions of buildings constructed to act
independently when resisting seismic forces may he placed in separate rating classifications.
15.17.060 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
The owner of each building within the scope of this chapter shall cause a structural analysis of the
building to be made by a civil or structural engineer or architect licensed by the State of California.
If the building does not meet the minimum earthquake standards specified in this chapter, the
owner shall either cause it to he structurally altered to conform the such standards; or cause the
building to be demolished.
The owner of a building within the scope of this chapter shall comply with the requirements set
forth above by submitting to the building official for review within the stated time limits:
January 19, 1993 Page 3
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
(a)Within 270 days after the service of the order, a structural analysis, which is subject to approval
by the building official, and which shall demonstrate that the building meets the minimum
requirements of this Chapter; or
(h)Within 270 days after the service of the order, the structural analysis and plans for the proposed
structural alterations of the building necessary to comply with the minimum requirements of this
chapter; or
(c)Within 120 days after service of the order, plans for the installation of wall anchors in
accordance with the requirements specified in Section 15.17.080; or
(d)Within 270 days after the service of the order, plans for the demolition of the building.
After plans are submitted and approved by the building official, the owner shall obtain a building
permit, commence and complete the required construction or demolition within the time limits set
forth in Table B. These time limits shall begin to run from the date the order is served in
accordance with Section 15.17.070 (a) and (h).
Owners electing to comply with Subsection (c) of this section are also required to comply with
Subsections (b) or (d) of this section provided, however, that the 270-day period provided for in
such Subsections (h) and (d) and the time limits for obtaining a building permit, commencing
construction and completing construction for complete structural alterations or building demolition
set forth in Table B shall be extended in accordance with Table C. Each such extended time limit,
except the time limit for commencing construction shall begin to run from the date the order is
served in accordance with Section 15.17.070(h). The time limit for commencing construction shall
commence from the date the building permit is issued.
15.17.070 ADMINISTRATION
A. Service of Order.
The building official shall issue and order, as provided in Section 15.17.070(h) to the owner of
each building within the scope of this chapter in accordance with the minimum time periods for
service of such orders set forth in Table C. The minimum time period for the service of such
orders shall be measured from the effective date of Chapter 15.64. Upon receipt of a written
request from the owner, the building official shall order a building to comply prior to the normal
service date for such building set forth in this section.
B. Contents of Order.
The order shall be in writing and shall be served either personally or by certified or registered mail
upon the owner as shown on the last equalized assessment, and upon the person, if any, in
apparent charge or control of the building. The order shall specify that the building has been
determined by the building official to he within the scope of this chapter and, therefore, is required
to meet the minimum seismic standards of this chapter. The order shall specify the rating
classification of the building and shall be accompanied by a copy of Section 15.17.060 which sets
forth the owner's alternatives and time limits for compliance.
C. Appeal Form Order.
The owner or person in charge or control of the building may appeal to the City Manager, the
building official's initial determination that the building is within the scope of this chapter. Such
January 19, 1993 Page 4
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
appeal shall be filed with the hoard within 60 days from the service date of the order described in
Section 15.17.070(h). Any such appeal shall be decided by the board no later than 60 days after
the date that the appeal is tiled. Such appeal shall he made in writing upon appropriate forms
provided therefor, by the building official and the grounds thereof shall he stated clearly and
concisely.
Each appeal shall be accompanied by a filing fee as set forth in the code.
Appeals or requests for slight modifications from any other determinations, orders or actions by
the building official pursuant to this chapter, shall he made in accordance with the normal appeal
procedures established in this code.
D. Recordation.
At the time that the aforementioned order is served, the building official shall file with the office of
the county recorder a certificate stating that the subject building is within the scope of Chapter
15.17 Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Buildings. The certificate shall also state that the
owner thereof has been ordered to structurally analyze the building and to structurally alter or
demolish it where it is not found to comply with Chapter 15.17.
If the building is found not to he within the scope of this chapter, or as a result of structural
alterations or an analysis is found to be structurally capable of resisting minimum seismic forces
required by this chapter; or is demolished; the building official shall file with the office of the
county recorder a certificate terminating the status of the subject building as being classified within
the scope of Chapter 15.17 Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Existing Buildings.
E. Enforcement.
if the owner or other person in charge or control of the subject building fails to comply with any
order issued by the building official pursuant to this chapter within any of the time limits set forth
in Section 15.17.060 the building official shall order the entire building vacated and remain vacated
until such order has been complied with. If compliance with such order has not been accomplished
within 90 days after the date the building has been ordered vacated, or by such additional time as
may have been granted, the building official may order demolition of the building in accordance
with the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings provisions of this code
15.17.080 VIOLATIONS PROHIBITED AND PENALTIES
A. Violation Prohibited.
No person, firm, partnership, association or corporation shall violate any provisions of this chapter
and any provision of the codes, rules or regulations adopted in this chapter.
B. Criminal Penalties.
Any person, firm, partnership, association or corporation violating any of the provisions of this
chapter or provisions of the codes, rules or regulations adopted in this chapter by reference is
guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof, shall be punishable by a fine of not more
than five hundred dollars or by imprisonment for a period of not more than six months, or by both
such fine and imprisonment.
C. Continuing Violation.
January 19, 1993 Page 5
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
Every person, firm, partnership, association or corporation violating any of the provisions, of this
chapter or provisions of the codes, rules of regulations adopted in this chapter by reference is
guilty of a separate offense for each day or portion thereof during which such violation continues
and shall he punishahle thereof as provided in this chapter.
15.17.090 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN
A. General.
Every structure within the scope of this Division shall be analyzed and constructed to resist
minimum total lateral seismic forces assumed to act nonconcurrently in the direction of each of the
main axes of the structure in accordance with the following equation:
V=ZIKCSW Formula (1)
The value of IKCS need not exceed the values set forth in Table D based on the applicable rating
classification of the building.
B. Lateral Forces on Elements of Structures.
Parts of portions of structures shall be analyzed and designed for lateral loads in accordance with
Subsections 15.17.090(a) and 2312(e) of the Uniform Building Code hut not less than the value
from the following equation:
Fp=ZICp SWp Formula (2)
For the provisions of this subsection, the product of IS need not exceed the values as set forth in
Table E.
EXCEPTION: Unreinforced masonry walls in buildings not having a rating classification of I may
he analyzed in accordance with Section 15.17.100.
The value of Cp need not exceed the values set forth in Table F.
C. Anchorage and Interconnection.
Anchorage and interconnection of all pans, portions and elements of the structure shall be analyzed
and designed for lateral forces in accordance with Table F of this code and the equation
Fp=ZICpSWp ad modified by Table E. Minimum anchorage of masonry walls to each floor or
roof shall resist a minimum force of 200 pounds per linear foot acting normal to the wall at the
level of the floor or roof.
D. Level or Required Repair.
Alterations and Repairs required to meet the provisions of this chapter shall comply with all other
applicable requirements of the Uniform Building Code unless otherwise specifically provided for
in this chapter.
E. Required Analysis.
I. General.
January 19, 1993 Page 6
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
Except as modified herein, the analysis and design relating to the structural alteration of
existing structures within the scope of this chapter shall be in accordance with the analysis
specified in Chapter 23.
2. Continuous Stress Path.
A complete, continuous stress path from every part or portion of the structure to the ground
shall be provided for the required horizontal forces.
3. Positive Connections.
All parts, portions or elements of the structure shall be interconnected by positive means.
Analysis Procedure.
1. General.
Stresses in materials and existing construction utilized to transfer seismic forces from the
ground to parts or portions of the structure shall conform to those permitted by the Uniform
Building Code and those materials and types of construction specified in Section
15.17.100.
2. Connections.
Materials and connectors used for interconnection of parts and portions of the structure
shall conform to the Uniform Building Code. Nails may be used as part of an approved
connector.
3. Unreinforced Masonry Walls.
Except as modified herein, unreinforced masonry walls shall he analyzed as specified in
Section 2406, 2407 and 2408 to withstand all vertical loads as specified in Chapter 23 of
the Uniform Building Code in addition to the seismic forces required by this chapter. The
50 percent increase in the seismic force factor for shear walls as specified in Section
2407(h) 4F of the Uniform Building Code may he omitted in the computation of seismic
loads to existing shear walls.
No allowable tension stress will he permitted in unreinforced masonry walls. Walls not
capable of resisting the required design forces specified in this chapter shall be strengthened
or shall be removed and replaced.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. Unreinforced masonry walls in buildings not classified as a Rating Classification I
pursuant to Table A may be analyzed in accordance with Section 15.17.100.
2. An unreinforced masonry wall which carries no design loads other than its own
weight may be considered as veneer if it is adequately anchored to new supporting
elements.
Combination of Vertical and Seismic Forces.
January 19, 1993 Page 7
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
1. New Materials.
All new materials introduced into the structure to meet the requirements of this section
which are subjected to combined vertical and horizontal forces shall comply with Section
2303(f).
7_. Existing Materials.
When stresses in existing lateral force resisting elements are due to a combination of dead
loads plus live load plus seismic loads, the allowable working stress specified in the
Uniform Building Code may be increased 100 percent. However, no increase will he
permitted in the stresses allowed in Section 15.17.100 and the stressed in members due
only to seismic and dead loads shall not exceed the values permitted by Section 2303(d) of
the Uniform Building Code.
3. Allowable Reduction of Bending Stress by Vertical Load.
In calculating tensile fiber stress due to seismic forces required by this chapter, the
maximum tensile fiber stress may he reduced by the full direct stress due to vertical dead
loads.
15.17.100
A. General.
MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION
All materials permitted by the Uniform Building Code including their appropriate allowable
stresses and those existing configurations of materials specified herein may beutilized to meet the
requirements of this chapter.
B. Existing Materials.
1. Unreinforced Masonry Walls.
Unreinforced masonry walls analyzed in accordance with this Section may provide vertical
support for roof and floor construction and resistance to lateral loads. The facing and
backing of such walls shall he bonded so that not less than 4 percent of the exposed face
area is composed of solid headers extending not less than 4 inches into the backing. The
distance between adjacent full-length headers shall not exceed 24 inches vertically or
horizontally. Where the hacking consists of two or more wythes theheader shall extend
not less than 4 inches into the most distant wythe, or the hacking wythes shall he bonded
together with separate headers whose area and spacing confoini to the foregoing.
Tension stresses due to seismic forces normal to the wall may he neglected if the walls do
not exceed the height to thickness ration in Table G and the in -plane shear stresses due to
seismic loads as set forth in Table J.
If the wall height -thickness ration exceeds the specified limits, the wall may he supported
by vertical bracing members designed in accordance with Section 15.17.090. The
deflection of such bracing member at design loads shall not exceed one -tenth of the wall
thickness.
January 19, 1993 Page 8
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
EXCEPTION: The wall may be supported by flexible vertical bracing members designed
in accordance with Section 15.17.090(b) if the deflection at design loads is not less than
one -quarter nor more than one-third of the wall thickness.
All vertical bracing members shall he attached to floor and roof construction for their design
loads independently of required wall anchors. Horizontal spacing of vertical bracing
members shall not exceed one-half the unsupported height of the wall nor ten feet.
The wall height may he measured vertically to bracing elements other than a floor or roof.
Spacing of the bracing elements and wall anchors shall not exceed six feet. Bracing
elements shall be detailed to minimize the horizontal displacement of the wall by
components of vertical displacements of the floor or roof.
2. Existing Roof, Floors, Walls, Footings, and Wood Framing.
Existing materials including wood shear walls utilized in the described configuration may
he used as part of the lateral load resisting system, provided that the stresses in these
materials do not exceed the values shown in Table H.
C. Strengthening of Existing Materials.
New materials including wood shear walls may he utilized to strengthen portions of the existing
seismic resisting system in the described configurations provided that the stresses do not exceed
the values shown in Table I.
D. Alternate Materials.
Alternate materials, designs and methods of construction may he approved by the building official
in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Building Code.
E. Minimum Acceptable Quality of Existing Unreinforced Masonry Walls.
1. General Provisions.
All unreinforced masonry walls utilized to carry vertical loads and seismic forces parallel
and perpendicular to the wall plane shall be tested as specified in this subsection. All
masonry quality shall equal or exceed the minimum standards established herein or shall he
removed and replaced by new materials. Alternate methods of testing may he approved by
the building official. The quality of mortar in all masonry walls shall be determined by
performing in -place shear tests or by testing eight inch diameter cores. Alternative methods
of testing may he approved by the building official. Nothing shall prevent pointing with
mortar of all the masonry wall joints before the tests are first made. Prior to any pointing,
the mortar joints must he raked and leaned to remove loose and deteriorated mortar. Mortar
for pointing shall he Type S or N except that masonry cements shall not he used. All
preparation and mortar pointing shall be done under the continuous inspection of a
(Registered Deputy Building Inspector). At the conclusion of the inspection, the inspector
shall submit a written report to the licensed engineer or architect responsible for the seismic
analysis of the building setting forth the result of the work inspected. Such report shall he
submitted to the building official for approval as part of the structural analysis. All testing
shall he performed in accordance with the requirements specified in this subsection by a
testing agency approved by the building official. An accurate record shall be kept of all
such tests and of their locations in the building, and these results shall he submitted to the
building official for approval as part of the structural analysis.
January 19, 1993 Page 9
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
2. Number and Location of Tests. The minimum number of tests shall be two per
wall or line of wall elements resisting a common force, or 1 per 1500 square feet of wall
surface, with a minimum of eight tests in any case. The exact test or core location shall be
determined at the building site by the licensed engineer or architect responsible for the
seismic analysis of the subject building.
3. In -Place Shear Tests. The bed joints of the outer wythe of the masonry shall be
tested in shear by laterally displacing a single brick relative to the adjacent bricks in that
wythe. The opposite head joint of the brick to he tested shall he removed and cleaned prior
to testing. The minimum quality mortar in 80 percent of the shear tests shall not he less
than the total of 30 psi plus the axial stress in the wall at the point of the test. The shear
stress shall he based on the gross area of both bed joints and shall he that at which
movement of the brick is first observed.
4. Core Tests. A minimum number of mortar test specimens equal to the number of
required cores shall be prepared from the cores and tested as specified herein. The mortar
joint of the outer wythe of the masonry core shall be tested in shear by placing the circular
core section in a compression testing machine with the mortar bed joint rotated 15 degrees
from the axis of the applied load. The mortar joint tested in shear shall have an average
ultimate stress of 20 psi based on the gross area. The average shall he obtained from the
total number of cores made. If test specimens cannot he made from cores taken, then the
shear value he reported as zero.
F. Testing of Shear Bolts.
One-fourth of all new shear bolts and dowels embedded in unreinforced masonry walls shall be
tested by a Special Inspector using a torque calibrated wrench to the following minimum torques:
1/2" diameter bolts or dowels = 40 foot-lbs.
5/8" diameter bolts or dowels = 50 foot-lbs.
3/4" diameter bolts or dowels = 60 foot-lbs.
No bolts exceeding 3/4" shall be used. All nuts shall he installed over malleable iron or plate
washers when hearing on wood and heavy cut washers when bearing on steel.
G. Determination of Allowable Stresses for Design Methods Based on Test Results.
I. Design Shear Values.
Design seismic in -plane shear stresses shall be substantiated by tests performed as specified
in Section 15.17.100(e) 3 and 4.
Design stresses shall be related to test results obtained in accordance with Table J.
Intermediate values between 3 and 10 psi may be interpolated.
2. Design Compression and tension Values.
Compression stresses from unreinforced masonry having a minimum design shear value of
3 psi shall not exceed 100 psi. Design tension values for unreinforced masonry shall not
be permitted.
H. Five percent of the existing rod anchors utilized as all or part of the required wall anchors
shall be tested in pullout by an approved testing laboratory. The minimum number tested
shall be four per floor, with two tests at walls with joists framing into the wall and two
January 19, 1993 Page 10
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
tests at walls with joists parallel to the wall. The test apparatus shall be supported on the
masonry wall at a minimum distance of the wall thickness from the anchor tested. The rod
anchor shall be given a preload of 300 lbs. prior to establishing a datum for recording
elongation. The tension test load reported shall he recorded at one -eight inch relative
movement of the anchor and the adjacent masonry surface. Results of all tests shall be
reported. The report shall include the test results as related to the wall thickness and joist
orientation. The allowable resistance value of the existing anchors shall he 40 percent of
the average of those tested anchors having the same wall thickness and joist orientation.
Qualification tests for devices used for wall anchorage shall be tested with the entire tension
load carried on the enlarged head at the exterior face of the wall. Bond on the part of the
device between the enlarged head and the interior wall face shill be eliminated for the
qualification tests. The resistance value assigned the device shall he 20 percent of the
average of the ultimate loads.
15.17.110 INFORMATION REQUIRED ON PLANS
A. General.
In addition to the seismic analysis required elsewhere in this Chapter, the licensed engineer or
architect responsible for the seismic analysis of the building shall determine and record the
information required by this Section on the approved plans.
B. Construction Details.
The following requirements with appropriate construction details shall he made part of the
approved plans:
1. All unreinforced masonry walls shall he anchored at the roof level by tension bolts
through the wall as specified in Table I, or by approved equivalent at a maximum
anchor spacing of six feet.
All unreinforced masonry walls shall he anchored at all floors with tension bolts through
the wall or by existing rod anchors at the maximum anchor spacing of six feet. All existing
rod anchors shall he secured to the joists to develop the required forces. The building
official may require testing to verify the adequacy of the embedded ends of existing rod
anchors. Tests when required shall conform to Section 15.17.100(h).
When access to the exterior face of the masonry wall is prevented by proximity of an
existing building, wall anchors conforming to Items 5 and 6 in Table I may he used.
Alternative devices to he used in lieu of tension bolts for masonry wall anchorage shall be
tested as specified in Section 15.17.100(i).
2. Diaphragm chord stressed of horizontal diaphragms shall he developed in existing
materials or by addition of new materials.
3. Where trussed and beams other than rafters or joists are supported on masonry,
ledgers or columns shall he installed to support vertical loads of the roof or floor
members.
January 19, 1993 Page 11
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
4. Parapets and exterior wall appendages not capable of resisting the forces specified
in this chapter shall be removed, stabilized or braced to insure that the parapets and
appendages remain in their original position.
5. All deteriorated mortar joints in unreinforced masonry walls shall be pointed with
Type S or N mortar (Masonry cements shall not he used). Prior to any pointing,
the wall surface must he raked and cleaned to remove loose and deteriorated mortar.
Al preparation and pointing shall be done under the continuous inspection of a
special inspector certified to inspect masonry or concrete. At the conclusion of the
project, the inspector shall submit a written report to the building official setting
forth the portion of work inspected.
6. Repair details shall be prepared for any cracked or damaged unreinforced masonry
wall required to resist forces specified in this chapter.
C. Existing Construction.
The following existing construction information shall be made part of the approved plans:
1. The type and dimensions of existing walls and the size and spacing of floor and
roof members.
?. The extent and type of existing wall anchorage to floors and roof.
3. The extent and type of parapet corrections, if any, which were performed in
accordance with the Uniform Building Code.
4. Accurately dimensioned floor plans and masonry wall elevations showing
dimensioned openings, piers, wall thickness and heights.
5. The location of cracks or damaged portions of unreinforced masonry walls
requiring repairs.
6. The type of interior wall surfaces and whether reinstalling or anchoring of ceiling
plaster is necessary.
7. The general condition of the mortar joints and whether the joints need pointing.
8. Site Plan
January 19, 1993 Page 12
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
TABLE A
RATING CLASSIFICATIONS
TYPE OF BUILDING CLASSIFICATIONS
Essential Building I
High Risk Building II
Medium Risk Building III
Low Risk Building IV
TABLE B
TIME LIMITS FOR COMPLIANCE (1)
Required Action Obtain Building Commence Complete
By Owner Permit Within Construction Construction
Within Within
Complete Structural
Alterations or 1 year 180 days (2) 3 years
Building Demolition
Wall Anchor 180 days 270 days 1 year
Installation
(1) Where two or more buildings under separate ownership are to he rehabilitated
simultaneously, an extension can he based on the average time requirements for the buildings
involved, with a suggested minimum extension of 6 months. An extension could he granted on
submission of a binding agreement between the owners involved, with the actual date of
compliance to he determined by the building official.
(2) Measured from date of building permit issuance. All the other time limits are measured
from the date of the order.
January 19, 1993 Page 13
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
TABLE C
SERVICE PRIORITIES AND EXTENDED TIME PROVISIONS
Extension of Time Minimum Time
Rating Occupant if Wall Anchors Periods for
Classification Load are Installed Service of Order
I
(Highest Priority) Any
1 year 0
II 100 or more 3 years 90 days
III
100 or more 5 years 1 year
51 to and
including 6 years 2 years
99
20 to and
including 6 years 3 years
50
IV
(Lowest
Priority)
Less than 20
7 years 4 years
TABLE D
HORIZONTAL FORCE FACTORS BASED
ON RATING CLASSIFICATION
RATING
CLASSIFICATION IKCS
I 0.186
II 0.133
III&IV 0.100
January 19, 1993 Page 14
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
TABLE E
HORIZONTAL FORCE FACTORS "IS"
FOR PARTS OR PORTIONS OF STRUCTURES
RATING
CLASSIFICATION IS
I 1.50
II 1.00
111 & IV 0.75
TABLE F
HORIZONTAL FORCE FACTOR "Cp" FOR PARTS OR
PORTIONS OF BUILDINGS OR OTHER STRUCTURES (1)
Part or Portion of
Buildings
Exterior bearing and non -hearing
walls, interior bearing walls and
partitions, interior non -hearing
walls and partitions over ten
feet in height, masonry fences
over six feet in height.
Cantilever parapet and other
cantilever walls, except
retaining walls.
Exterior and interior
ornamentations and appendages.
Direction Value
of Force of Cp
Normal to
Flat Surface
Normal to
Flat Surface
Any
Direction
When connected to or a part of
a building; towers, tanks, towers
and tanks plus contents, racks
over 8 feet 3 inches in height
plus contents, chimneys, smoke- Any
stacks, and penthouses. Direction
When connected to or a part of
a building: Rigid and rigidly
mounted equipment and machinery
not required for continued Any
operation of essential Horizontal
occupancies.(5) Direction
0.20
1.00
1.00
0.20(2)(4)
0.20(3)
January 19, 7993 Page 15
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
Tanks plus effective contents
resting on the ground.
Floors and roofs acting as
diaphragms.
Any
Direction
In the plane of
the diaphragm
Prefabricated structural
elements, other than walls, Any
with force applied at center Horizontal
of gravity of assembly. Direction
Connections for exterior
panels or elements.
Any
Direction
0.12
0.12(6)
0.30
2.00
(1) See Section 15.17.090(B) for use of Cp.
(2) When located in the upper portion of any building with a hn/D ratio of 5 to 1 or
greater the value shall be increased by 50%.
(3) For flexible and flexibly mounted equipment and machinery, the appropriate values
for Cp shall he determined with consideration given to both the dynamic properties
of the equipment and machinery and to the building or structure in which it is
placed.
(4) The Wp for storage racks shall he the weight of the racks plus contents. The value
of Cp for racks over two storage support levels in height shall be 0.16 for the levels
below the top two levels.
(5) The design of the equipment and machinery and their anchorage is an integral part
of the design and specification of such equipment and machinery. The structure to
which the equipment or machinery is mounted shall be capable of resisting the
anchorage forces (see also Section 23 I2(g)4.
(6) Floor and roofs acting as diaphragms shall he designed for a minimum force
resulting from a Cp of .12 applied to Wp unless a greater force results from the
distribution of lateral forces in accordance with Section 2312(e).
January 19, 1993 Page 16
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
TABLE G
ALLOWABLE VALUE OF HEIGHT -THICKNESS RATIO
OF UNREINFORCED MASONRY WALLS WITH MINIMUM
QUALITY MORTAR. (1) (2)
BUILDING WITH CROSSWALKS ALL OTHER
DEFINED BY SECTION 15.17.040 BUILDINGS
Walls of
One Story Buildings 16 13
First Story Wall of
Multi -Story Buildings 16 15
Walls in Top Story of
Multi -Story Buildings 14 9
All Other Walls 16 13
Minimum quality mortar shall he determined by laboratory testing in accordance
with Section 15.17.100(E).
(2) Table G is not applicable to buildings of rating classification I. Walls of buildings
within rating classification I shall be analyzed in accordance with Section
15.17.090(F).
TABLE H
VALUES FOR EXISTING MATERIALS
EXISTING MATERIALS OR ALLOWABLE VALUES
CONFIGURATION OF MATERIALS (1)
HORIZONTAL DIAPHRAGMS
a. Roofs with straight
sheathing and roofing
applied directly to the
sheathing.
b. Roofs with diagonal
sheathing and roofing
applied directly to the
sheathing.
c. Floors with straight
tongue and groove sheathing.
d. Floors with straight
sheathing and finished
wood flooring.
100 lbs. per foot
for seismic shear
400 lbs. per foot
for seismic shear
150 lbs. per foot
for seismic shear.
300 lbs. per foot
for seismic shear.
January 19, 1993 Page 17
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
e. Floors with diagonal
sheathing and finished
wood flooring.
f. Floors or roofs with
straight sheathing and
plaster applied to the joist
or rafters. (2)
2. SHEAR WALLS
Wood stud walls with
lath and plaster.
3. PLAIN CONCRETE FOOTINGS
4 . DOUGLAS FIR WOOD
5 . REINFORCING STEEL
6 . STRUCTURAL STEEL
450 lbs. per foot
for seismic shear.
Add 50 lbs. per
foot to the
allowable values
for Items la and lc.
100 lbs. per foot
each side for
seismic shear
f' = 1500 psi unless
otherwise shown by
tests.
Allowable stress
same as No. 1 D.F.(3)
f = 18.000 lbs. per
square inch max. (3)
f = 20,000 lbs. per
t
square inch max. (3)
Material must he sound and in good condition.
The wood lath and plaster must he reattached to existing joists or rafters in a manner
approved by the Department.
Stresses given may be increased for combinations of loads as specified in Section
15.17.090(G) 2.
January 19, 1993 Page 18
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
TABLE I
ALLOWABLE VALUES OF NEW MATERIALS USED
IN CONJUNCTION WITH EXISTING CONSTRUCTION1
NEW MATERIALS OR
CONFIGURATION OF MATERIALS
1. HORIZONTAL DIAPHRAGMS
Plywood sheathing applied directly
over existing straight sheathing
with ends of plywood sheets bearing
joists or rafters and edges of
plywood located on center of
individual sheathing hoards.
2. SHEAR WALLS
a. Plywood sheathing applied
directly over existing wood
studs. No value shall he given
to plywood applied over existing
plaster or wood sheathing.
b. Drywall or plaster applied
directly over existing wood studs.
c. Drywall or plaster applied
to plywood sheathing over
existing wood studs.
3. SHEAR BOLTS
Shear bolts and shear dowels
embedded a minimum of 8 inches
into unreinforced masonry walls.
Bolt centered in a 2 1/2 inch
diameter hole with dry -pack or
non -shrink grout around cir-
cumference of bolt or dowel.l
4 TENSION BOLTS
Tension bolts and tension dowels
extending entirely through
unreinforced masonry walls
secured with bearing plates on
far side of wall with at least
30 sq. inches of area.2
ALLOWABLE VALUES
Same as specified in
Table No. 25-J-1 of
this is Code for on
blocked diaphrams.*
Same as values
specified in Table
No. 25-K-1 for shear
walls.
75% of the value as
specified in Table
47-I.
33 1/3 per cent
of the values
specified in
Table No. 47-I.
100% of the values
for solid masonry
specifies in Table
24E. No values
larger than those
3/4 inch bolts shall
be used.
1200 lbs. per bolt
or dowl.
January 19, 1993 Page 19
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
WALL ANCHORS 15.17.110(B)
5 . Bolts extending to the exterior
face of the wall with a 2 1/2
inch round plate under the head.
Installed as specified for shear
bolts. Spaced not closer than
12 inches on centers.1, 2
6 . Bolts or dowels extending to the
exterior face of the wall with
a 2 1/2 inch round plate under
the head and drill at an angle
of 22 1/2 degrees to the horizontal
Installed as specified for
shear bolts.l, 2
INFILLED WALLS
7 Reinforced masonry infilled
openings in existing unrein-
forced masonry walls with
keys or dowels to match
reinforcing.
REINFORCED MASONRY
8. Masonry piers and walls
reinforced per Section 2407.
REINFORCED CONCRETE
9 . Concrete footings, walls and
piers reinforced as specified
in Division 26 and designed
for tributary loads.
EXISTING FOUNDATION LOADS
10. Foundation loads for
structures exhibiting no
evidence of settlement.
NOTES:
Bolts and dowels to he tested as spec
600 lbs. per bolt.
1200 lbs. per bolt.
Same as values
specified for
unreinforces masonry
walls.
Same as values
specified in
Division 26, UBC
Same as values
specified in
Division 26, UBC
Calculated existing
foundation loads
due to maximum dead
load plus live load may be increased
by 25% for dead load,
and may he increased
50% for dead load
plus seismic load
required by this
Division.
ed in Section 15.17.100(f).
January 19, 1993 Page 20
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
Bolts and dowels to be 1/2 inch minimum in diameter.
Eighty percent
of test results
in psi not less
than
TABLE J
ALLOWABLE SHEAR STRESS FOR TESTED
UNREINFORCED MASONRY WALLS
Average test results
of cores in psi
Seismic in -plane
shear based on
gross area (1)
30 plus axial stress 20 3 psi
40 plus axial stress 27 4 psi
50 plus axial stress 33 5 psi
100 plus axial stress 67 or more 10 psi max
or more
(1) Allowable shear stress may he increased by addition of 10% of the axial stress due to the
weight of the wall directly above.
GLOSSARY OF SYMBOLS AND NOTATIONS
C =Numerical coefficient as specified in Section 2312(d)
Cp =Numerical coefficient as spec tied in Section 2312(h) and as st forth in Table No.
23-J
D =The dimension of the structure, in feet, in a direction parallel to the applied forces
f'c =Specified compressive strength of concrete, psi
Fp =Lateral forces on a part of the structure and in the direction under consideration
ft =Allowable tensile stress, psi
hn =Height in feet above the base to level n
I =Occupancy Importance Factor as set forth in Table No. 23-K
S =Numerical coefficient for site -structure resonance
V =The total lateral force or shear at the base
W =The total dead load as defined in Section 2302 including the partition loading
specified in Section 2304(d) where applicable
January 19, 1993 Page 21
"Earthquake Hazard Reduction in Buildings" - Ordinance No. 977
Wp =The weight of a portion of a structure or nonstructural component
Z =Numerical coefficient dependent upon the zone as determined by Figure No. 1, of
Chapter 23. All areas in California are classified in Zones 3 or 4. For locations in
Zone No. 3, Z = 3/4. For locations in Zone No. 4, Z = 1
DATE OF EFFECT
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force from and after its approval as required by law.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to he published in
a newspaper of general circulation and published in the County of Riverside, State of California.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 5th day of January, 1993.
MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 19th
day of January, 1993 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN
JACINTO
I, Maurice Armster, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that the
foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No.977 duly adopted by the City Council of the City of San
Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the 19th day of January, 1993.
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this
January 1993.
City Clerk
day of
January 19, 7993 Page 22
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: January 19, 1993
SUBJECT: Norton Air Farce Base Defense Financing and Accounting Service Center
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. supporting Norton as a location for
the Accounting Center for forwarding to federal and state legislators.
BACKGROUND: At the regular meeting of January 5, 1993, staff presented to the
Council the proposal under consideration for placement of the Accounting Center at
Norton, or other possible sites. At that time Council, by consensus, directed staff to bring
back a resolution of support which would be forwarded to the federal and state legislators
to encourage favorable consideration of the Norton site. Further, the Council directed
staff to encourage the VEDC Friday Lunch Bunch and the City of Hemet to go on record
in support for the Norton site. Letters to these agencies, as well as the San Jacinto
Chamber of Commerce and the Riverside County Economic Development Council have
been sent encouraging their support.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA. SUPPORTING
TH h LOCATION OF A DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,
DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE (DFAS)
CENTER AT NORTON A.F.B.
WHEREAS, Norton Air Force Base is slated for closure by the Department of Defense
in accordance with the Base Realignment and Closure Act, and is therefore being proposed for
various reuse activities under the jurisdiction of the Inland Valley Development Agency; and,
WHEREAS, Norton AFB has for several decades been a major employer and economic
benefit for the region's economy and has housed a variety of sizeable Air Force support units,
including audit, Inspector General, safety, and audio-visual functions; and.
WHEREAS, because of the many similar public and private operations in the general
locale, the San Bernardino region has an abundance of skilled workers who can respond
immediately to the human resource needs of such an Accounting Center; and,
WHEREAS, the region boasts a significant number of two and four year colleges and
Universities, including the California State University, San Bernardino, with a highly acclaimed
undergraduate and graduate accounting program, which produce a great number of well -qualified
and highly skilled graduates annually and provide an abundance of highly trained and educated
accounting personnel at all levels; and,
WHEREAS, the area has experienced, and is continuing to experience, dramatic and
debilitating job losses in a great number of occupational sectors, as a consequence of Department
of Defense reductions and the general economic distress; and.
WHEREAS, the region has been devastated by other recent and planned job site closures,
including George AFB, Santa Fe Railroad. Kaiser Steel, Lockheed Aircraft. General Dynamics,
and TRW; and,
WHEREAS, the San Bernardino region offers an abundance of affordable housing choices
and many other welcome attributes to new employees;and,
WHEREAS, the siting of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service Center (DFAS)
at Norton AFB enjoys enthusiastic and popular support throughout the region, because it will be
a major employer and economic asset throughout the region; and.
WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto will find itself and its citizens similarity benefitted
by the location of such an Accounting Center.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF SAN JACINIO)
I, Maurice Armster, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, California, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that the forgoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California, held on the day of
1993 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
(SEAL)
I, Maurice Armster, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, California, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution No. is a full, true and correct copy of that now on
file in this office.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of San Jacinto this day of
Maurice Armster. City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Jacinto,
California does hereby resolve and approve the foregoing.
SECTION 1. The City Council joins in supporting and endorsing the proposal by the Inland
Valley Development Agency and urges the Department of Defense to approve location of a
Defense Accounting Center at the site located at Norton Air Force Base.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this
ATTEST:
Maurice Armster, City Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
day of , 1993.
Mayor
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
FROM: Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: January 19, 1993
SUBJECT: Annexation #4 to Community Facilities District #3
NEIGHBORHOOD
City Wide
RECOMMENDATION
5:15_
1. Adopt a Resolution adopting Annexation Boundary Map for Annexation 4 to
Community Facilities District #3
Adopt a Resolution of Intention to annex territory to Community Facilities District
#3 and setting the public hearing for March 2, 1993.
BACKGROUND
Community Facilities District #3, the City's public safety CFD, was originally formed in
February 1989. Subsequently, three annexations have taken place. Due to the existence of
this district, the City was able to budget a police force expansion in FY 92-93.
Each development is conditioned to join the public safety CFD. Annexation 4 includes the
following developments:
Area 1
Area 2
Tract 23860 Elia Enterprises, Patricia Elia
7th St. at Dillon/Ash
Pizza Hut Fugate Enterprises, Michael Sipes
State St. south of Ramona Blvd.
City Council Staff Report
January 19, 1993
Page 2
Area 3
Parcel Map 27648 Stater Bros., Jack H. Brown President
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Walter F. Ford, Vice President
San Jacinto Ave. and Esplanade St.
The initial Resolution approves the annexation map for the annexation. The second
Resolution declares the intention to annex territory and sets the public hearing for March
2, 1993.
BRIAN MC NABB
Director of Community Development
2
3
4
5
6
8
91
10
11
12'
13''.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27,
281
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION OF THE
'nfln '
OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING "OUNDARI :.AP SHOWING TERRITORY TO BE
ANNEXED TO AN EXISTING 'CCMMUNITY 7fNCILITIES DISTRICT
THIS RESOLUTION IS DD'PTED ''_I H REFERENCE TO THE FOLLOWING
FACTS:
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body"),
desires to annex territory
an existing Community Facilities
District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello -Roos
Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1,
Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of
California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof. The existing
Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO, 3 (hereinafter referred to as the
"District"; and,
WHEREAS, there has been submitted a map showing the territory
proposed to be annexed to the existing Community Facilities
District, said area tc be designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 3, ANNEXATION NO- (hereinafter referred to as the
"annexed territory").
NOW, THEREFORE, BE =°T' RESC JT'E , by the City Council of the
City of San Jacinto, in reg'_7.1ar session, this th day of
January, 1993, as follows:
I. That the above true and correct.
That the map showing the property, parcels and territory,
proposed to be annexed co an existing Community Facilities
District and to be subject to a special tax to he levied
is hereby approved and adopted. Said map is designated by
the name of the existing District and the number of the
proposed annexation.
3. A certificate shall be endorsed on the original and on at
least one (1) copy of the map of the District, evidencing
the date and adoption of this Resolution, and within
fifteen (13) days after the adoption of the Resolution
fixing the time c.n::'. place of the hearing on the intention
to annex or extent of the annexation to said District, a
copy of said shall be filed with the correct and
proper endorsen.en.s thereon with the County Recorder, all
in the manner .=nd form Provided for in. Section 3111 of the
Streets and Hiq:nways Cod _ the State .._ California.
2
3
4
5
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
181
19I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPT= Af: A REGULAR MEETING OF SAID CITY
COUNCIL duly held the ig:h day of January, 1993.
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
Mayor
RTTTTGATE
The foregoing is certified to he a true copy of a Resolution
duly adopted by said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on
the date therein set forth.
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
S
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7,ESCLUTI,',N NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITC COT7CIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARINC- INT77,TTIC:N TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO AN
EXISTING COMMUNITY FRC:LIT:ES 72:=RICT
THIS RESOLUTION IS ,IDOPTED 7.77ITH REFERENCE TO THE FOLLOWING
FACTS:
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO,
CALIFORNIA, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body"),
at this time is desirous to annex territory to an existing
Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and
provisions of the "Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982",
being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government
Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5
thereof. The existing Community Facilities District has been
designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 (hereinafter
referred to as the "District"); and,
HEREAS, the area proposed to be annexed shall be known and
esignated as COMMUNITY- FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3, ANNEXATION
NO. 4 (hereinafter referred to as the "annexed territory").
WHEREAS, this legislative body is now desirous to proceed to
adopt its Resolution of Intention to annex territory to the
existing District, to describe the territory included within the
existing District and the territory proposed for annexation, to
specify the services to be srovided, to set and specify the
special taxes that would be levied within the territory proposed
o be annexed, and to set a time and place for a public hearing
relating to the annexation of territory to said District; and,
WHEREAS, a map showing the territory to be annexed has been
submitted, which said map is hereby approved and a copy of said
map shall he kept on file with the transcript of these
proceedings.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOL7-3D, by the City Council of the
City of San Jacinto, in regular session, this th day of
January, 1993:
RECITALS
That the above recitals are all true and correct.
LEGAL AUTHORITY
That these proceedings for annexation are initiated by
this legislative body pursuant to the authorization cf
Section 53339.2 of the Government Code of the State cf
California.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TON TO ANNEX
3. That this legislative body hereby determines that tb_
public convenience and necessity requires that certain
territory be added tc 'she existing District and this legis-
lative body declares its intention to annex said territory
to the existinc community Facilities District, and a
description of the boundaries and territory proposed to be
annexed is as fallows:
All that property and territory proposed to be annexed to
the existing Community Facilities District, as said
property is shown on a map as previously approved by this
legislative body, said -map designated by the number of the
annexation and the name of the existing Community Facili-
ties District, = copy of which is on file in the Office of
the City Clerk and shall remain open for public
inspection.
A general description of the territory included in the
existing District is hereinafter described as follows:
All that property and territory as previously included
within the original Community Facilities District, as said
property was shown on a map as approved by this legisla-
tive body designated by the name of the original existing
Community Facilities District, a copy of which is on file
in the Office of the City Clerk, as well as a copy heir
on file in the Office of the County Recorder.
NAME
The name of the proposed annexation shall be known and
designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3,
ANNEXATION NO. 4.
SERVICES
That the types of public services provided in the existing
District are generally described as set forth below, and
no additional services are to be provided in the annexed
territory and _:re existing services for the existing
District will serve the properties within the annexed
territory. A genera- description of the services autho-
rized in the exist_.. District is set forth as follows:
Additional police and fire services necessary and required
to meet increased demands within the boundaries of the
District.
SPECIAL TAX
6. It is the intention of this legislative body that, except
where funds are otherwise available, a special tax suffi
cient to pay for said services to be provided in t
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
annexed territory, secured by recordation of a continuing
lien against all non-exempt real property in the annexed
territory, will be levied annually within the boundaries
of the annexed t='-ri n'-7 . For particulars as to the rate
and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax,
reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit
"A", which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of
apportionment ,o allow each landowner or resident within
the annexed territory to clearly estimate the maximum
amount that said Person
tax.
will have to pay on said special
The proposed special taxes sha
be collected in the same
manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject
to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority
in any case of delinquency as applicable for ad valorem
taxes; however, as applicable, this legislative body may
establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure
as necessary.
EXEMPT PROPERTY
7 This legislative body hereby determines that parcels owned
by regulated public utilities and in use in the providing
of telephone service, water, electricity, gas or other
means of heat, illumination, power or any other public
service, shall be exempt from the special tax.
PUBLIC HEARING
8. NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT ON THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH, 1993, AT THE
HOUR OF 7:30 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF
THE LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING THE COMMUNITY CENTER, 525 SO.
PICO, SAN JACINTO. CA, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD WHERE
THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY WILL CONSIDER THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO THE EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT, TEE PROPOSED METHOD AND APPORTIONMENT OF THE
SPECIAL TAX TO BE LEVIED WITHIN SAID PROPOSED ANNEXED
TERRITORY, AND ALL OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH IN THIS
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION. ANY INTERESTED PERSONS MAY
APPEAR AND BE HEARD, AND WRITTEN PROTESTS SHALL BE FILED
ON OR BEFORE THE TIME FIXED FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ECTION
9. Upon the conclusion of the public hearing, i_ the legisla-
tive body determines to proceed with the annexation, a
proposition sha H. submitted to the qualified electors
of the proposed annexed area. The vote shall be by
registered voters within the proposed annexed area;
however, if there are Less than 12 registered voters, the
vote shall be landowners, with each landowner having
one vote per acre or portion thereof within the annexed
territory.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
s
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
13
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
23
NOTICE
10. That notice of the time and place of the public heari
shall be given by the City Clerk in the following manner:
A. A Notice of Public Hearing shall be published in the
legally designated newspaper of general circulation,
being the HEMET NEWS. said publication pursuant to
Section 6061 of the Government Code, with said publica-
tion to be completed at least seven (7) days prior to
the date set for the public hearing.
B. A Notice of Public Hearing shall be mailed, postage
prepaid, to each property owner within the boundaries
of the area proposed for annexation; said mailing to
the property owners shall be to the address as shown
on the last equalized assessment roll. Said mailing
shall be :completed at least fifteen (15) days prior to
the date set for the public hearing.
VIRONM NTAL EVALUATION
11. All environmental evaluation proceedings relating to the
annexation of territory to the existing District shall he
completed prior to the date and time set for the public
hearing.
12. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of thi..
Resolution.
MOVED, PASSED AND ADOPTED AT t REGULAR MEETING OF SAID CITY
COUNCIL duly held theJ.9th day of January, 1993.
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
Hayor
CERTT__'_I.CATE
The foregoing is certified be a true copy of a Resolution
duly adopted by said _ Council of the City of San Jacinto on
the date therein set
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3
ANNEXATION NO. 4
EXHIEIT -A"
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX
The Resolution of Intention refers to this Exhibit for an
explanation of the race and apportionment of the special tax so
as to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed
district to estimate the maximum annual amount that would be
reauired for payment. For particulars as to the rate and method
of apportionment, see the following:
PROPERTY CATEGORIES AND MAXIMUM ANNUAL TAX
Taxable property categories and initial maximum annual taxes are
as follows:
MAXIMUM ANNUAL TAX
PROPERTY CATEGORY (FISCAL YEAR 1989-90)
RESIDENTIAL UNIT $96.40 per dwelling unit
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL $0.05 per sauare foot per
year for developed area
RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL taxes shall be levied on
all property upon the issuance of a building permit in the
fiscal year next following the issuance of the building permit.
ESCALATION CF TAX
The above authorized taxes for are for fiscal year 1989-90, and
are subject to annual increases to reflect increases in the
Consumer Price Index.
TERM
The Final Land Use Residential Tax shall be levied as long as
necessary to pay for additional services.
DEFINITIOMS
The "Consumer Price Tfldex" ahall be the Los Angeles/Riverside
Area - All Urtan Consumer Price index, published by the United
States Bureau of Labor Stat.L.st.f,cs, as said data is available
June 30th of each fiscal year.
"Developed Area' stall be that portion of the land to he
developed as measured from outside walls, excluding garage,
covered ways and overhangs, Patios and additions.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
� P
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
"Dwelling Unit" shall mean any building and any mobilehome which
is not immediately transports le or any portion thereof whit`
contains living facilities, c_uding provisions for sleepin
eating, cooking and sanitation -
"Fiscal Year" shall be Jules - =_rough June 30 of any year.
For all particulars velating to implementation, further
interpretation, definitions, -and all other particulars related
to the method and apportionment of the tax, reference is made to
the "Report" as previously approved by this legislative body.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
&:/(1,
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
STAFF REPORT
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
Les Evans, Interim Public Works Director
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
January 19, 1993
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2 PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NEIGHBORHOOD
Rancho San Jacinto
RECOMMENDATION
Approve and accept the off -site improvements for CFD No. 2, Phase II which have been
completed by Genesis Construction and authorize the filing of a Notice of Completion.
FISCAL IMPACT
City Council awarded a contract to Genesis Construction in the amount of $2,295,514.59.
Change Orders totalling $144,150.02 have been approved by Council increasing the final
contract amount to $2,439,664,61. Genesis is claiming an additional $24,052.60 which
the City has denied.
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
Genesis Construction was awarded the contract for installation of street improvements,
underground utilities and drainage facilities for Phase II of Community Facilities District No.
2 on October 18, 1991, The improvements have been completed and a Notice of
Completion can be filed.
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City Clerk
City of San Jacinto
201 East Main Street
San Jacinto, CA 92383
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR RECORDERS USE ONLY
Notice is hereby given by the undersigned owner, a political subdivision of the State
of California, that a public work of improvement described as Community Faci 1 i ties
District No. 2, Phase II Improvements
has been completed and was accepted by the undersigned awarding authority on the date
hereof.
The contractor on such work was Genesis Construction
and the surety bond is with riremen's Insurance Co of Newark, N.J.
The real property upon which said work was performed is in the City of San Jacinto,
County of Riverside, State of California and described as: (Legal description or street
address or other specific location)
Rancho San Jacinto Development Phase II
Date: January 11. 1993
City of San Jacinto
(Date of Acceptance) (Name of Political Subdivision)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) By
ss
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) Title
f hereby certify that I am the
of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California the political subdivision which
executed the foregoing notice and on whose behalf I make this verification; that I have read
said notice, know its contents. and that the same is true. I certify under penalty of perjury
that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at San Jacinto, California on
(Date)
Deputy City Clerk
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Anna A. Vega, Finance Director
SUBJ: Deferred Compensation Plan
DATE: January 19, 1993
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council adopt the attached resolution amending the
City's deferred compensation plan to include Lincoln National
Life Insurance Company as a program administrator.
BACKGROUND
Resolution 1076 was adopted by the City Council establishing a
deferred compensation plan. The Deferred Compensation Plan is in
accordance with IRS Code Section 501(c) and provision Section
457.
This amendment allows an optional program to be offered to City
employees through Lincoln National Life Insurance Company.
Including Lincoln National as an additional deferred
compensation administrator will allow City employees the choice
of two different programs and plans offered by ICMA or Lincoln
National.
The deferred compensation program is an employee optional benefit
which involves not City funds.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CITY'S
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED
BY RESOLUTION NO. 1931.
WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto desires that the investment
of funds held under its deferred compensation plan be
administered by ICMA Retirement Corporation, and Lincoln National
Life Insurance Company, and that such funds be held in trust
established by public employers for the collective investment of
funds held under their deferred compensation plans and money
purchase retirement plans;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of San Jacinto
hereby adopts the "Deferred Compensation Plan", attached here to
as Appendix A.
Be IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director of the City
of San Jacinto shall be the coordinator for this program and
shall receive necessary reports, notices, etc. from the contracts
issued to ICMA Retirement Trust and Lincoln National Life
Insurance Company, and shall cast on behalf of the City of San
Jacinto, any required votes under the programs.
APPROVED AN ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 1993.
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
Mayor
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
L1NTRODUCTION
In accordance with the provisions of SEC 501(C) and as provided in Section 457 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, CITY OF SAN JACINTO hereby establishes the Deferred Compensation Plan of CITY
OF SAN JACINTO hereinafter referred to as the 'Plan.Nothing contained in this Plan shall be deemed to
constitute an employment agreement between any Participant and the Employer and nothing contained
herein shall be deemed to give a Participant any right to be retained in the employ of the Employer.
II. DEFINITIONS
2.01 'ADMINISTRATOR' shall mean the person or persons, if any, appointed by the Employer to administer
the Plan.
2.02 "BENEFICIARY' shall mean the persons or entities designated by a Participant pursuant to section 5.02.
2.03 'CODE' shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or any future United States
internal revenue law. References herein to specific section numbers shall be deemed to refer to
corresponding provisions of any future United States internal revenue law.
2.04 'COMPENSATION' shall mean all payments made to an Employee by the Employer as remuneration
for services rendered, including salaries and fees.
2.05 DEFERRED COMPENSATION' shall mean the amount of Compensation not yet earned which the
Participant and the Employer mutually agree will be deferred.
2.06 'EMPLOYEE' shall mean any employee who performs services for and receives any type of
Compensation from the Employer for whom services are rendered.
2.07 'EMPLOYER' shall mean CITY OF SAN JACINTO.
2.08 'INCLUDIBLE COMPENSATION' shall mean, for purposes of the limitation set forth in section 4.02,
Compensation for services performed for the Employer that Is currently includible in the Participant's gross
income for Federal income tax purposes, determined without regard to any community property laws.
Includible Compensation thus does not Include Compensation excludible from the Participant's gross
income under Section 457 of the Code as a result of deferrals under this Plan or under other provisions
of the Code (for example, Section 911).
2.09 'NORMAL RETIREMENT AGE' shall mean, with respect to each Participant, the later of:
(a) The age designated by the Participant between
(i) the earliest age at which the Participant has the right to file for and receive
benefits from the Employer's basic retirement plan without the Employer's
consent and to receive immediate retirement benefit without actuarial or similar
reduction because of early retirement, and
(ii) age 70 1/2, or
(b) The age at which the Participant terminates his service with Employer:
Provided, however, that the Participant's election to defer amounts in excess of the
maximum deferral allowed by Section 4.02 but within the limited catch-up permitted by
Section 4.03 shall constitute a designation of an age pursuant to subsection (a).
2.10 'PARTICIPANT' shall mean any Employee who executes a Participation Agreement with the
Administrator assenting to the provisions of the Plan, once the Agreement has been approved by the
Administrator. Except for purposes of Articles IV, VII, and XIV, "participant' shall include former Participants.
The Administrator, if otherwise eligible, may participate in the Plan.
2.1 1 "PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT' shall mean the agreement executed and filed by an Employee with the
Employer pursuant to section 4.01, in which the Employee elects to become a Participant in the Plan.
2.12 'PLAN YEAR' shall mean the calendar year.
2.13 'SEPARA170N OF SERVICE' shall mean the Participant's termination from service with Employer,
occurring other than by reason of death, within the meaning of Section 402(e)(4)(iii) of the Code, or on
account of the Participant's death or retirement.
2.14 'TOTAL AMOUNT DEFERRED' shall mean, with respect to each Participant, the sum of all
Compensation deferred under the Plan, plus income or less loss thereon calculated in accordance with
section 4,08 by the method designated in the Participant's Participation Agreement(s) under which such
Compensation was deferred and in any subsequent election(s) to change methods.
2.15 'UNFORESEEABLE EMERGENCr shall mean severe financial hardship to a Participant resulting from
a sudden and unexpected illness or accident of the Participant or of a dependent (as defined in Section
152(a) of the Code) of the Participant, loss of the Participant's property due to casualty, or other similar
extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances arising as result of events beyond the control of the
Participant. The need to send a Participant's child to college or the desire to purchase a home shall not
constitute Unforeseeable Emergencies. The Administrator shall determine in its sole discretion whether
a hardship to a Participant constitutes an Unforeseeable Emergency.
III. ADMINISTRATION
3.01 This Plan shall be administered by the Administrator, who shall represent the Employer in all matters
concerning the administration of this Plan.
(2)
3.02 Appointment and Termination of Administrator:
The CITY MANAGER of CITY OF SAN JACINTO shall be the Administrator. The rights, powers,
privileges, and duties of the Administrator shall pass to each successor CiTY MANANGER of CITY OF SAN
JACiNTO.
3.03 Subject to any applicable laws, the Administrator shall have full power and authority to adopt rules and
regulations for the administration of the Plan, and to interpret, alter, amend, or revoke any rules and
regulations so adopted.
3.04 Every action taken by Administrator shall be presumed to be a fair and reasonable exercise of the
authority vested in or the duties imposed upon it. The Administrator shall be deemed to have exercised
reasonable care, diligence and prudence and to have acted impartially as to all persons interested, unless
the contrary be proven by affirmative evidence, The Administrator shall not be liable for amounts payable
under the Plan.
3.05 For convenience and to facilitate the orderly administration of the Plan, the Administrator shall maintain
a deferred compensation ledger account with respect to each Employee.
3.06 Subject to any applicable laws and any approvals required by the Employer, the Administrator may
delegate any of or all of his, her or its powers and duties hereunder to another person, persons, or entity,
and may pay reasonable compensation for such services as an administrative expense of the Plan, to the
extent such compensation is not otherwise paid.
W. PARTICIPATION IN THE PLAN
4.01 ENROLLMENT IN THE PLAN:
(a) An Employee may become a Participant by executing a Participation Agreement Compensation
will be deferred for any calendar month only if a Participation Agreement providing for such
deferral is executed by the Participant and approved by the Administrator or its designee before
the beginning of such month.
(b) By signing the Participation Agreement, the Participant elects to participate in the Plan and
consents to the deferral by the Employer of the amount specified in the Participation Agreement
from the Participant's gross compensation for each pay period, The deferred amount must
equal at least $10.00 bi-weekly.
4.02 Deferral Limitations: Except as provided in Section 4.03, the maximum that may be deferred under the
Plan for any taxable year of a Participant shall nor exceed the lesser of (a) $7,500 or (b) 33 7/3% of the
Participant's includible Compensation, each reduced by any amount excludable from the Participant's gross
income for that taxable year under Section 403(b) or 401(k) of the Code on account of Employer
contributions.
In the case of a person who participates in more than one Deferred Compensation Plan governed by
Section 457 of the Code, the limitations set forth in Sections 4.02 and 4.03 shall apply to all such plans
considered together.
(3)
4.03 Limited Catch -Up: For one or more of the Participant's last three taxable years ending before attaining
Normal Retirement Age under the Plan, the maximum deferral shall be the lesser of
(a) $15,000, reduced by any amount excludable from the Participant's gross income for that taxable
year under Section 403(b) or 401(k) of the Code on account of Employer contributions, or
(b) the sum of
(i) the limitations established for purposes of Section 4.02 of the Plan for such taxable year
(determined without regard to this Section 4.03), plus
(ii) so much of the Limitation established under Section 4.02 for prior taxable years
(beginning after December 31, 1978 and during all or any portion of which the
Participant was eligible to participate in this Plan) as has not theretofore been used
under Sections 4.02 or 4.03, plus
(iii) so much of the limitation established in accordance with Treasury Regulations 1.457-
2(e)(1) under an eligible state Deferred Compensation Plan (within the meaning of
Section 457 of the Code and the regulations thereunder) sponsored by an entity other
than the Employer (beginning after December 31, 1978 and during all or any portion
of which the Participant was eligible to participate in such other plan) as has not
theretofore been used under any other plan and this Section 4.03; Provided, however,
that this Section 4.03 shall not apply with respect to any Participant who has previously
utilized in whole or in part the limited catch-up under this plan (within the meaning of
Section 457 of the Code and the regulations thereunder).
4.04 The Participant acknowledges the right of the Administrator to disallow deferral of Compensation under
the Plan in excess of the limitations stated above. However, the Administrator shall have no liability to a
Participant if the Administrator fails to disallow a deferral in excess of such limitations, if the Participant's
Participation Agreement directed such deferral.
4.05 A Participant may modify the Participation Agreement with respect to future amounts once during each
open enrollment period authorized by the Administrator.
4.06 A Participant may at any time revoke his agreement to defer Compensation by filing a written request
for revocation with the Administrator on a form approved by the Administrator, at least 30 days prior to the
effective date of the revocation, However, his Total Amount Deferred shall be distributed only as provided
in Articles V and VI. A Participant's request for a distribution in the event of an Unforeseeable Emergency
shall in addition be treated as a request for revocation of deferrals as of a date determined by the
Administrator.
4.07 A Participant who has received all of his Total Amount Deferred as set forth in Article Viii or revokes
his Participation Agreement as set forth in Section 4.06 above, may again become a Participant by
executing in an open enrollment period authorized by the Administrator, a new Participation Agreement to
defer Compensation not yet earned.
4.08 Choice of investment: income will be accrued on amounts deferred under the Plan in accordance with
the following procedure. The Administrator will in its sole discretion select certain investment options to
be used to determine income to be accrued on deferrals. The investment options may include contracts
issued through ICMA and the Lincoln National Life insurance Company.
(4)
Each Participant will designate on his Participation Agreement the investment that will be used to determine
the income to be accrued on amounts deferred by him. If the investment chosen by the Participant
experiences a gain, the Participant's benefits under the Plan likewise will reflect income for that period.
if the investment chosen by the Participant experiences a loss, the Participant's benefits under the Plan,
likewise will reflect loss for that period. The Administrator may from time to time change the investment
options under the Plan. If the Administrator eliminates a certain investment option, all Participants who had
chosen that investment will select another option; the Participant will have no right to require the
Administrator to select or retain any investment option. A Participant may from time to time (whether before
or after payments have commenced under the Plan) change his choice of investment option. Any change
with respect to investment options made by either the Administrator or a Participant, however, may affect
only income to be accrued after that change.
V. DISTRIBUTION PROCEDURES
5.01 Upon Retirement - Distributions to a Participant who retires upon or after attaining Normal Retirement
Age shall commence on the first day of the third month following his/her retirement; provided, however,
that at least 60 days prior to such commencement day, the Participant may irrevocably elect to defer the
commencement of benefit payments until a fixed or determinable date subsequent to the commencement
date specified in this Section 5.01. In no event shall distribution commence later than the later of (i) 60
days after the close of the Plan Year in which the Participant or former Participant attains (or would have
attained) Normal Retirement Age, or (ii) 60 days after the close of the Plan Year in which the Participant
separates from service with the Employer. Distribution shall be made in one lump sum or in regularly
scheduled payments as specified in the Participant's Participation Agreement or as otherwise specified by
the Participant in writing to the Administrator no less than 60 days prior to the commencement of payments.
The amount of such lump sum or scheduled payments, unless distributed as annuity or insurance
contracts, shall equal the value of the Participant's account or on scheduled payment, value of account plus
subsequent earnings.
5.02 Upon death - In the event of a Participant's death prior to the distribution of all amounts credited to
his account, such remaining amounts shall be paid to the Participant's Beneficiary commencing on the first
day of the third month after the Participant's death. Such distribution shall be in the form of a single lump
sum payment or regularly scheduled payments, at the election of the Participant in the Participation
Agreement or (if there is no such election by the Participant) of the Beneficiary after the Participant's death,
but at least 60 days prior to the commencement of benefit. Each Participant may designate in his
Participation Agreement a Beneficiary or Beneficiaries to receive any amounts which may be distributed
in the event of his death prior to the complete distribution of benefits. A Participant may change his
designation of Beneficiaries at any time by filing a proper application with the Administrator. If no such
designation is in effect on a Participant's death, or if the designated Beneficiary does not survive the
Participant by 30 days, his Beneficiary shall be his Estate.
5.03 Upon Disability - In the event of a Participant's Disability, distributions shall commence as of the first
day of the third month following his/her separation from service, provided, however, that at least 60 days
prior to such commencement of benefit payments, the Participant may irrevocably elect to defer the
commencement of benefit payments until a fixed or determinable date subsequent to the commencement
date specified in this Section 5.03. In no event shall distribution commence later that the later of (i) 60 days
after the close the Plan Year in which the Participant or former Participant attains (or would have attained)
Normal Retirement Age or (ii) 60 days after the close of the Plan Year in which the Participant separates
from service with the Employer. Distribution shall be made in one lump sum or in regularly scheduled
payments as specified in the Participant's Participation Agreement or as otherwise specified by the
Participant in writing to the Administrator not less than 60 days prior to the scheduled payments. The
amount of such lump sum or scheduled payment, unless distributed as annuity or insurance contracts, shall
equal the value of the Participant's account or on scheduled payment, value of account plus subsequent
earnings. (5)
5.04 Upon Termination of Service - in the event of a Participant's separation from service in circumstances
other than those described in Sections 5.01, 5.02, and 5.03 of this Plan, distributions shall commence on
the first day of the third month following his/her separation from service, provided, however, that at least
60 days prior to such commencement date the Participant may irrevocably elect to defer the
commencement of benefit payments until a fixed or determinable date subsequent to the commencement
date specified in this Section 5.04. In no event shall distribution commence later than the later of (i) 60
days after the close of the Plan Year in which the Participant or former Participant attains (or would have
attained), Normal Retirement Age, or (ii) 60 days after the close of the Plan Year in which the Participant
separates from service with the Employer. Distribution shall be made in one lump sum or in regularly
scheduled payments as specified by the Participant's Participation Agreement or otherwise specified by
the Participant in writing to the Administrator not less than 60 days prior to the commencement of payments.
The amount of such lump sum or scheduled payments, unless distributed as annuity or insurance
contracts, shall equal the value of the Participant's Account or on scheduled payments, value of account
plus subsequent earnings.
5.05 Required Beginning Date - The entire interest of the Participant will be distributed, or commence to
be distributed, not later than the April 1 following the calendar year in which the Participant attains age 70
1/2 ("required beginning date'), in equal or substantially equal amounts over (i) the life of the Participant,
(ii) the lives of the Participant and his Beneficiary, (iii) a period not extending beyond the life expectancy
of the Participant and his Beneficiary, (iv) a period not extending beyond the joint and last survivor
expectancy of the Participant and the Beneficiary, or (v) a combination of the foregoing. If the Participant
has not retired, as of the required beginning date, distributions shall commence no later than 60 days after
the close of the plan year in which he separates from service.
5.06 Limitations on Distributions - Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan, distributions shall be
subject to the following limitations:
(a) If distribution first commences under Section 5.01, 5.03, 5.04, or 5.06, such distribution shall be made
in a form under which:
(i) the amount distributed in each year commencing with the required beginning date must be
either (A) a level amount determined by applying the Participants entire interest to the purchase
of an annuity contract commencing payments at least annually on or before the required
beginning date over a period consistent with Section 5.06 or (B) at least equal to the quotient
obtained by dividing the Participant's then remaining interest by the life expectancy of the
Participant or the joint and last survivor expectancy of the Participant and the Beneficiary, as
relevant;
(ii) if provision is made for the payment of a portion of the benefits to a Beneficiary, the amount
payable to the Participant actuarially must exceed 1/2 of the maximum amount payable to the
Participant had no provision been made for payments to the Beneficiary (determined as of the
commencement of the distribution); and
(iii) any amount not distributed to the Participant during his life will be distributed after the death of
the Participant at least as rapidly as the rate being used under Section 5.06(a)(ii) as of the date
of his death.
(6)
(b) If distribution first commences after the Participant's death under Section 5.02, the Participant's entire
interest must be distributed over a period not to exceed (i) the Beneficiary's fife or life expectancy, if the
Beneficiary, is the Participant's surviving spouse and if distribution commences on or before the date the
deceased Participant would have attained age 70 1/2, (ii) the lesser of 15 years or the life expectancy of
the Beneficiary, if the Beneficiary is not the Participant's surviving spouse and if distributions commence
within one year of the date of the Participants death in equal or substantially equal payments, or (iii) the
lesser of 5 years from the date of the Participant's death or the Beneficiary's life expectancy, if subsections
(b) (i) and (b) (ii) are inapplicable. For purposes of this subsection, any amount paid to a child of the
Participant will be treated as if it had been paid to the surviving spouse if the remainder of the interest
becomes payable to the surviving spouse when the child reaches the age of majority.
(c) For purposes of Section 5.06, 5.06(a) and 5.06(b), life expectancies will be computed by use of the
expected return multiples in Treasury Regulations 1.72-9 or, if distribution is to be effected through a
contract issued by and insurance company, by use of the mortality tables of such company. For purposes
of Section 5.06, 5.06(a)(I), and 5.06(b)(i), the life expectancy of the Participant and the Participant's surviving
spouse (if such spouse is the Beneficiary) may be recalculated annually.
(d) Any distribution hereunder payable over a period in excess of one year can only be made in
substantially nonincreasing amounts, paid not less frequently than annually, which includes but is not
limited to the method described in Section 5.06(a)(0(A) and (B).
VI. FORM OF DISTRIBUTION
6.01 Distributions of amounts under Article V of the Plan shall conform to the requirements of this Article
VI.
(a) Subject to the requirements of this Article VI, each Participant may elect the settlement option and
payment period for payments to be made with respect to each event described in Article V from among any
alternatives offered by the Administrator. Such election may by made or modified until the date 30 days
prior to the time that benefit payments are to commence. The settlement options and payment periods
available under the Plan shall be:
(1) A lump sum distribution;
(2) Annual or more frequent (but not more frequently than monthly) installments as nearly equal as
practicable over a definite period; and
(3) A life annuity provided by an insurance company.
(b) If the Total Amount Deferred is less than $1,750, or if a Participant has elected a settlement option for
himself or his Beneficiary that require installment or annuity payments of less than $50.00 per month,
determined as of the date benefit payments are to commence, then notwithstanding any election made
pursuant to subsection (a), the Employer shall pay the total Amount Deferred to the Participant or his
Beneficiary in a single payment on the date payments are to commence.
(c) Subject to the provisions of this Article Vi, if a Participant does not effectively elect a settlement option
and payment period for benefits payable under Section 5.01, then such benefits shall be paid to the
Participant in the form of a life or 15-year certain annuity.
(7)
If a Participant does not effectively elect a settlement option and payment period for benefits payable under
Section 5.02, then such benefits shall be paid, beginning on the first day of the third month following the
Participant's death, in the following form:
(1) Benefits payable to the Participant's surviving spouse shall be paid in the form of a life annuity
or a "Systematic -type" distribution under Section 401(a)(9) IRC;
(2) Benefits payable to the Participant's Estate shall be paid in a lump -sum distribution;
(3) Benefits payable to any other Beneficiary shall be paid in the form of a 15-year certain annuity;
VII FINANCIAL HARDSHIP
Notwithstanding any other provision herein, in the event of an Unforeseeable Emergency as defined in
Section 2.15 hereof, a Participant may make a request to the Administrator that the Employer pay all or a
portion of the Total Amount Deferred to the date of payment. If the application for payment is approved by
the Administrator, payment will be made within 60 days following such approval. Payment shall be limited
strictly to that amount reasonably necessary to meet the situation constituting the Unforeseeable
Emergency, and payments may not be made to the extent that a hardship is or may be relieved through
reimbursement or compensation by insurance or otherwise, by liquidation of the Participant's assets (to the
extent such liquidation does not itself cause severe financial hardship), or by cessation of deferrals under
the Plan. Any remaining amounts shall be paid in accordance with Articles V and VI of the Plan.
VIIi. LEAVE OF ABSENCE
8.01 If a Participant is on an approved leave of absence from the Employer with compensation, or on
approved leave of absence without compensation for a period of not more than three months (which period
may be extended by the Employer), his participation in the Plan may continue.
8.021f a Participant is on an approved leave of absence without compensation and such leave of absence
continues beyond the period specified in Section 8.01, said Participant shall have terminated employment
with the Employer, provided, however, that prior to the expiration of the period specified in Section 8.01,
said Participant may request the Administrator to permit him to leave the funds previously deferred in the
Plan. Upon termination of leave without pay and return to active status, the Participant may execute a new
Participation Agreement to be effective when permitted by the Plan.
IX. AMENDMENT OR TERMINATION OF PLAN
9.01 The Employer may at any time terminate its participation in this Plan. Upon such termination, each
Participant in the Plan will be deemed to have revoked his agreement to defer future compensation as
provided in Section 4.06 as of the date of such termination. Each Participant's full Compensation on a non -
deferred basis shall thereupon be restored.
9.02 The Employer may also amend the provisions of the Plan (including those provisions with respect to
its duties and responsibilities hereunder) at any time; provided, however, that no amendment shall affect
the amount of benefits which at the time of such amendment shall have accrued for Participants or
Beneficiaries, to the extent of any Compensation deferred before the time of the amendment and income
thereon accrued to the date of the amendment, calculated in accordance with Section 4.08.
(8)
X RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANS
It is intended that, pursuant to Section 457 of the Code, the amount of Deferred Compensation will not be
considered current compensation for purposes of Federal income taxation. Such amounts will, however,
be included as compensation to the extent required under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA).
Payments under this Plan will supplement retirement and death benefits payable under the Employer's
group insurance and retirement plans, if any.
XI. NON -ASSIGNABILITY
It is agreed that neither the Participant nor his Beneficiary, nor any other designee shall have any right to
commute, sell, assign, transfer, or otherwise convey the right to receive any payments hereunder, which
payments and right thereto are expressly declared to be non -assignable and non -transferable; and in the
event of attempt to assign or transfer, the Employer shall have no further liability hereunder, nor shall any
unpaid amounts be subject to attachment, garnishment or execution, or be transferable by operation of law
in event of bankruptcy, insolvency, except to the extent otherwise required by law.
XII. ASSETS
All amounts of Compensation deferred under the Plan, all property and rights purchased with such
amounts, and all income attributable to such amounts, property or rights, shall remain (until made available
to the Participant or his Beneficiary) solely the property and rights of the Employer subject only to the
claims of the Employer's general creditors.
XIII. PARTICIPATION BY ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBERS
The Administrator may participate in the Plan under the same terms and conditions as apply to other
Participants but shall not have the power to participate in any administrative action taken with respect to
his participation without approval of the Board of Directors of the Employer.
XIV. EMPLOYER PARTICIPATION
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Plan, the Employer may add to the amounts payable to any
Participant under the Plan additional Deferred Compensation for services to be rendered by the Participant
to the Employer during a calendar month, provided:
(a) The Participant has elected to have such additional Compensation deferred, invested, and distributed
pursuant to this Plan, prior to the calendar month in which the Compensation is earned, and
(b) Such additional Compensation deferred, when added to all other Compensation deferred under the
Plan, does not exceed the maximum deferral permitted by Article IV.
XV. DISCLAIMER WITH RESPECT TO INVESTMENTS
The Employer, the Board of Directors and the Administrator, if one has been appointed, make no
endorsement, guarantee or any other representation and shall not be liable to the Plan or to any Participant,
Beneficiary, or any other person with respect to the financial soundness, investment performance, fitness
or suitability (for meeting a Participant's objectives, future obligations under the Plan, or any other purpose)
of (a) any investment vehicle offered as a standard for measuring income on amounts deferred under the
Plan under Section 4.08, or (b) any investment vehicle in which amounts deferred under the Plan are
actually invested.
(9)
XVI. PLAN -TO -PLAN TRANSFERS
17.01 Transfers to the Plan: if a Participant was formerly a participant in an eligible state deferred
compensation plan (within the meaning of Section 457 of the Code and the regulations thereunder) and
if such plan permits the direct transfer of the Participant's interest therein to the Plan, then the Plan shall
accept assets representing the value of such interest; provided, however, that the Administrator may require
in his sole discretion that some or all of such interest be transferred in cash or its equivalent. Such amount
shall be held, accounted for, administered and otherwise treated in the same manner as Compensation
deferred by the Participant under the Plan including, without limitation, for purposes of Section 4.01 except
that
(a) only the amount, if any, transferred to this Plan which was deferred under the transferror plan in the
taxable year when transfer occurs shall be treated as Compensation deferred under the Plan in such
year for purposes of Sections 4.01 and 4.02 and 4.03 and
(b) such amount shall remain subject to, and shall be administered in accordance with, any irrevocable
elections made under the transferror plan with respect to such amount.
17.02 Transfers from the Plan: The amounts credited to the account of a former Participant in the Plan may
be transferred to another eligible state deferred compensation plan (within the meaning of Section 457 of
the Code and the regulations thereunder) and in which the former Participant currently participates, and
if such plan provides for the acceptance of such amounts; provided, however, that if a Participant
terminates his service with the Employer in order to accept employment with the entity sponsoring such
plan and if such plan accepts transferred amounts, then payment of benefits under the Plan will not
commence, regardless of any other provision of the Plan, and the deferrals will automatically be transferred
to such plan.
17.03 Application for Transfer: If the conditions in Section XVI are met and the Participant wishes to
transfer his/her account, he/she shall complete any application form and/or other documents as may be
required by the Administrator.
17.04 Administrative Rules: The Administrator shall prescribe such rules consistent with the provisions of
Sections 17.01 and 17.02 concerning plan -to -plan transfers as in its sole judgement deems desirable for
the orderly administration of the Plan.
XVII. INTERPRETATION
18.01 This Plan shall be construed under the laws of the State of California.
18.02 This Plan is intended to be an eligible state deferred compensation plan with the meaning of Section
457 of the Code, and shall be interpreted so as to be consistent with such Section and all regulations
promulgated thereunder.
18.03 Word Usage: Words used herein in the singular shall include the plural and the plural the singular
where applicable, and one gender shall include the other gender where appropriate.
18.04 Headings: The headings of articles, sections or other subdivisions hereof are included solely for
convenience of reference, and if there is any conflict between such headings and the text of the Plan, the
text shall control.
(10)
18.05 Counterparts: This instrument may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original and said counterparts shall constitute but one and the same instrument, which may be
sufficiently evidenced by the counterparts.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
ATTEST:
BY:
Deputy City Clerk
day of
BY:
, 19
Mayor
City of San Jacinto
Staff Report
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
FROM: Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief/Building Official //(,//z/q3
DATE: January 19, 1993
SUBJECT: Community Beautification Ordinance Amendment
(Graffiti)
RECOMMENDATION:
Introduce an Ordinance which amends the Community Beautification Ordinance,
City of San Jacinto Ordinance No. 954, to clarify the definition of graffiti and the
abatement procedures for graffiti.
BACKGROUND:
The purpose of this amendment to the Community Beautification Ordinance is to
accomplish the City Council's desire to develop a "graffiti ordinance" consistent
with the City of Hemet. As you know, both cities have been meeting regularly as
part of a Valley Graffiti Committee. The City Attorneys of both cities met with
staff to discuss a graffiti ordinance which could be used in both jurisdictions. It
was determined at that time that the only necessary legal move needed by San
Jacinto was to amend its beautification ordinance. Hemet's nuisance ordinance
does not proclaim graffiti to be a nuisance; therefore, Hemet amended their
nuisance ordinance declaring graffiti a nuisance and also amended their current
graffiti ordinance to a simple ordinance which defines graffiti and gives the City
the right to expend public funds to abate graffiti. Our amendment to the
beautification ordinance accomplishes the same things using the same basic
language as Hemet's ordinance to maintain consistency.
Following are the recommended changes to the Community
Beautification Ordinance as proposed in the amended ordinance:
Section 3. The City Council of the City of San Jacinto finds and determines that
graffiti is a visual blight, decreases property values, is associated with crime and
delinquency, and the continued existence of graffiti encourages more graffiti and
the problems associated therewith.
Page 1
Section 5. The City Council finds that the expeditious removal of graffiti is
necessary to protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of San Jacinto.
Section 6. The City is authorized by California Government Code Section
53059.3 to enact an ordinance to provide for the use of City funds to remove
graffiti from public or privately owned structures located on public or privately
owned real property within the City.
8.04.020 Definitions.
For the purpose of this chapter, the following words and phrases are defined and
shall be construed as hereinafter set out, unless it is apparent from the context
that a different meaning was intended:
"Graffiti" as used in this Chapter includes any unauthorized inscription,
word, figure or design that is marked, etched, scratched, drawn or painted
on any structural component of any building, structure or other facility,
regardless of the nature of the material of that structural component. The
City Council of the City of San Jacinto also finds that graffiti or other
inscribed material is "obnoxious."
8.04.060 Removal of Graffiti.
Whenever the Code Enforcement Officer determines that graffiti is so located on
public or privately owned structures on public or privately owned real property
within this City so as to be capable of being viewed by persons utilizing any
public right-of-way in this City, the Code Enforcement Officer is authorized to
provide for the removal of the graffiti solely at the City's expense, without
reimbursement from the property owner upon whose property the graffiti has
been applied, upon the following conditions:
A. The painting or repair is limited to the area reasonably required to
remove the graffiti.
B. The removal of graffiti as authorized by this Chapter may be performed
only after securing the consent of the public entity having jurisdiction over
the structure, and in the case of a privately owned structure, only after
securing the consent of the owner.
Nothing in 8.04.060 shallpreclude the use of the other provisions of this Chapter
in the removal of graffiti when necessary.
Page 2
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
OF SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.04 TO TITLE 8
OF THE SAN JACINTO MUNICIPAL CODE AND REPEALING ORDINANCE
NO. 954 RELATING TO COMMUNITY BEAUTIFICATION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of San Jacinto finds and determines that this City
desires well -kept properties and strict enforcement of building and zoning regulations and that the
values and general welfare of this community arc founded, in part, upon the appearance and
maintenance of properties and property values.
Section 2. The Council further finds and determines that certain detrimental conditions, as
hereinafter set forth as nuisances, are injurious or potentially injurious to the public health, safety
and welfare of the community by: contributing to the problems of expenditures for protection
against hazards; the reduction of property values; the necessity for the prevention of crime,
accidents, fires, and disease; and, the need to preserve the community in a manner which is not
offensive to the senses and which does not interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life and
property.
Section 3. The City Council of the City of San Jacinto finds and determines that graffiti is a
visual blight, decreases property values, is associated with crime and delinquency, and the
continued existence of graffiti encourages more graffiti and the problems associated therewith.
Section 4. The City Council of the City of San Jacinto further finds and determines that the
regulation of property as described herein reasonably relate to the proper exercise of police power
to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public and is reasonably encompassed with the
purview of the authorizations granted by the California Government Code and the State
Constitution, and that unless corrective measures are undertaken to alleviate certain property
maintenance conditions, acceptable community standards will he depreciated.
Section 5. The City Council finds that the expeditious removal of graffiti is necessary to
protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of San Jacinto.
Section 6. The City is authorized by California Government Code Section 53059.3 to enact an
ordinance to provide for the use of City funds to remove graffiti from public or privately owned
structures located on public or privately owned real property within the City.
Section 7. The City Council further finds and determines that the abatement of such conditions
will enhance the image, appearance and the values of neighboring properties, will benefit the use
and enjoyment of properties in the City, and will ultimately improve the City's tax base.
Section 8. Chapter 8.04 of Title 8 of the San Jacinto Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
February 2, 1993 Pagel
ORDINANCE NO. -- Community Beautification Ordinance
Chapter 8.04
NUISANCES
Sections:
8.04.010 Intent and Purpose
8.04.020 Definitions
8.04.030 Abatement of Violation and Public Nuisance
8.04.040 Alternative Remedies
8.04.050 Classification of Nuisances
8.04.060 Removal of Graffiti
8.04.070 Declaration of Public Nuisance
8.04.080 Emergency Abatement
8.04.090 Right of Entry
8.04.100 Service of Notices and Order to Abate
8.04.110 Voluntary Abatement of Nuisances
8.04.120 Failure to Voluntarily Abate a Declared Public Nuisance
8.04.130 Notice of Intention to Abate Public Nuisance and Public Hearing
Notice
8.04.140 Hearing by Community Preservation Committee
8.04.150 Decision by Community Preservation Committee
8.04.160 Service of the Abatement Order
8.04.170 Abatement by Property Owner
8.04.180 Abatement by the City
8.04.190 Cost of Abatement
8.04.200 Record of Cost of Abatement
8.04.210 Cost Report -- Hearing and Proceedings
8.04.220 Assessment of Costs Against Property
8.04.230 Violations
8.04.240 Grievance with Final Order -- Appeal to City Council
8.04.250 City Council Action
8.04.01 0 Intent and Purpose.
It is the intent and purpose of this chapter to identify and provide a remedy for certain conditions
which, when found to exist on land within the City, are detrimental to public health, safety or
welfare, or which interfere with the reasonable enjoyment of life or property, and thereby create a
public nuisance.
The purpose of this chapter is to provide minimum standards for the maintenance of property in the
City. However, it is not intended by this chapter to repeal, abrogate, annul or in any way impair or
interfere with existing provisions of other laws or ordinances, or with private restrictions placed
upon property by covenant, deed, or other private agreement or with restrictive covenants running
with the land to which the City is a party.
8.04.020 Definitions.
For the purpose of this chapter, the following words and phrases are defined and shall he
construed as hereinafter set out, unless it is apparent from the context that a different meaning was
intended:
February 2, 1993 Page 2
ORDINANCE NO. -- Community Beautification Ordinance
"Building" means any house, garage, duplex, apartment, condominium, stock
cooperative, or other residential structure and any nonresidential building.
B . "City" means the City of San Jacinto.
C. "Code Enforcement Officer" means the City Manager for the City and her duly
authorized representatives.
D. "Community Preservation Committee" shall consist of five (5) persons selected
from the various City identified neighborhoods with two (2) alternates, all to he appointed
by the City Council.
E. "Owner" means any person owning property, as shown on the last equalized assessment
roll for the City or the lessee, tenant or other person having control or possession of the
property.
"Person" means any individual, firm, partnership, association, corporation,
company or organization of any kind.
G. "Property" means all residential and nonresidential, real property, including, but not
limited to front yards, side yards, hack yards, driveways, parkways, walkways and
sidewalks and shall include any building located on such property.
H. "Public Streets" means all dedicated rights -of -way used mainly for vehicular travel,
including alleys.
I. "Graffiti" as used in this Chapter includes any unauthorized inscription, word, figure or
design that is marked, etched, scratched, drawn or painted on any structural component of
any building, structure or other facility, regardless of the nature of the material of that
structural component. The City Council of the City of San Jacinto also finds that graffiti or
other inscribed material is "obnoxious."
8.04.030 Abatement of Violation and Public Nuisance.
Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Code, whenever there is a condition or use existing
on private land and such use or condition is a public nuisance and is a violation of any provision of
this Code, the proceedings set forth in this chapter may he used as an alternative to any other
proceeding or manner of getting abatement set forth in this Code.
8.04.040 Alternative Remedies.
Nothing in this chapter shall he deemed to supersede other provisions of this Code, nor prevent the
City from commencing civil or criminal proceedings to abate a public nuisance under applicable
Civil Code or Penal Code provisions as an alternative or in addition to the proceedings set forth in
this chapter.
8.04.050 Nuisances.
The following acts and conditions when performed or existing upon any lot or parcel of land
within the City are hereby declared to he unlawful and are hereby defined as and declared to he
public nuisances which are injurious or potentially injurious to the public health, safety and
welfare, which have a tendency to degrade the appearance and property values of surrounding
February 2, 1993 Page 3
ORDINANCE NO. -- Community Beautification Ordinance
property or which cause damage to public rights -of -way. Therefore, it shall he unlawful for any
person owning, leasing, renting, occupying or having charge or possession of any property in the
City, improved or unimproved, to maintain or to allow to be maintained, such property in such
manner that any of the following acts or conditions are found to exist thereon, except as may he
allowed in this Code:
A. Land:
1. The topography, geology or configuration of which, as a result of grading
operations, excavation or fill, causes erosion, subsidence, or surface water drainage
problems of such magnitude as to he injurious to the public or to the adjacent
properties.
2. Uncovered excavations. Uncovered excavations of more than three feet in depth
having a total volume in excess of six cubic feet.
B. Buildings and Structures:
Buildings which are abandoned, boarded up, partially destroyed, or left in a state of
partial construction for an unreasonable period of time; and such buildings which
are unpainted or where the paint on the building exterior is mostly worn off; and
such buildings which exhibit badly weathered roofs in part or in their entirety.
2. Faulty weather protection including, but not limited to, crumbling, cracked,
missing, broken, or loose exterior plaster or other siding, roofs, foundations or
floors, broken or missing windows or doors, or unpainted surfaces causing dry
rot. warping, or termite infestation.
3. Buildings, walls, and other structures which have been damaged by tire, flood,
earthquake, decay or otherwise to such an extent that they cannot be economically
repaired so as to conform to the requirements of the building code in effect in the
City.
4. Unoccupied buildings which have been left unlocked or otherwise open or
unsecured from intrusion by persons, animals or the elements or which arc hoarded
up by a method or materials not approved by the Fire and Life Safety Department.
5. Broken windows constituting hazardous conditions and inviting trespassers.
6. Fences or walls which are in a hazardous condition, or which are in disrepair, or
which hinder free access to public sidewalks.
7. Fences or walls which do not meet City standards as specified in this Code or any
other City standard or ordinance. Fences shall he:
a. Free of graffiti.
b. Free of water stains.
c. Standing vertical to the ground, structurally sound, with no holes in the
fencing material.
February 2, 1993 Page 4
ORDINANCE NO. -- Community Beautification Ordinance
d. Maintained in their original condition unless an alternate approval has been
given by the City.
8. The maintenance of any building, structure or property in violation of the
provisions of or in an unsafe or substandard condition as defined in various
uniform construction codes as adopted by the City.
C. Property Maintenance:
l . The accumulation of dirt, litter or debris on the property which is visible from a
public street.
2. Clotheslines or clothes hanging in front yards, sidcyards, porches or balconies and
visible from a public street.
3. Trash, garbage or refuse cans, bins, boxes or other such containers stored in front
or sideyards and visible from a public street.
4. Packing boxes, lumber, junk, trash, salvage materials, or other debris kept on the
property for an unreasonable period and visible from a public street.
5. Attractive nuisances dangerous to children and visible from a public street,
including abandoned, broken or neglected equipment, machinery. refrigerators and
freezers, hazardous pools, ponds and excavations.
6. Broken or discarded furniture, household equipment and furnishings or shopping
carts stored on the property for unreasonable periods and visible from a public
street.
7 Overgrown vegetation likely to harbor rats, vermin and other nuisances causing
detriment to neighboring properties or property values or obstructing necessary
view of drivers on public streets or private driveways and visible from a public
street.
Dead, decayed, diseased or hazardous trees, weeds or other vegetation constituting
unsightly appearance, dangerous to public safety and welfare or detrimental to
neighboring properties or property values and visible from a public street. These
include weeds of wingy and/or downy nature and/or attain such a large growth as to
become a fire menace when dry. These weeds are considered seasonal and
recurrent and shall not exist upon parkways, streets and private property within the
City.
9. Graffiti or other words, letters or drawings which remain on the exterior of any
building or fence and are visible from a public street.
10. Boats, trailers, vehicles, vehicle parts or other articles of personal property which
are abandoned or left in a state of partial construction or repair for an unreasonable
period of time in front yards, sideyards, driveways, sidewalks or walkways and are
visible from a public street.
11_ Camper shells which are left for an unreasonable period of time in front yards,
driveways, sideyards, sidewalks, or walkways and are visible from a public street.
February 2, 1993 Page 5
ORDINANCE NO. -- Community Beautification Ordinance
12. Breeding places for flies. Any barn, stable, chicken house or yard, manure or
fertilizer pile which is a breeding place for flies, or liable to become such.
13. Any accumulation of garbage or filth.
14. Obstructions to sidewalks, streets, etc. Unapproved encroachments upon or
obstructions in or to any sidewalk, street, alley, lane, court, park or other public
place.
15. Sidewalks dangerous to public safety. The existence or presence of a sidewalk in
need of repair and which is dangerous to the public safety.
16. Water which is a breeding place for mosquitoes, The accumulation of any pool of
water in such a manner that the same is, or may become, a breeding place for
mosquitoes.
17. Substantial neglect of property, including all yard areas, landscaping, irrigation
systems and similar improvements.
18. Paved areas which have deteriorated containing loose material, potholes, broken,
raised or depressed sections, or which have become insufficient to prevent mud
and/or dirt.
19. The accumulation of junk, trash, refuse, lumber, rocks, dirt, broken concrete or
asphalt, scrap metals, scrap plastic or polymer materials, scrap building materials,
tree and landscape trimmings and other similar or related materials either inside or
outside buildings which have been unlawfully placed or retained on property or
otherwise disposed of illegally or improperly.
D. Fire hazards as determined by the Fire Chief of the City.
Noises:
1. Human, animal, electrical, etc. The persistent emission or maintenance of any
noise which disturbs the peace or comfort, or is injurious to the health of an entire
community or neighborhood or any considerable number of persons.
?. Loudspeakers or amplifying devices. Unauthorized operation or use of any
loudspeaker or amplifying device on any public street or in any public place or
outside of any building facing upon a business street.
Radio waves or television interference. Radio wave or television interference
which can reasonably be eliminated.
Wrecking yards, junkyards, etc. Automobile wrecking yards; brick, cement
block or tile yards; junkyards; junk iron or metal; dilapidated or dismantled automobiles;
household appliances; machinery or parts within any residential district as the same are
defined in this Code or any other City ordinance.
H. Signs:
1. Signs constructed or erected in violation of the provisions of this City Code or any
other City ordinance as in effect at the time of their construction or erection.
February 2, 1993 Page 6
ORDINANCE NO. -- Community Beautification Ordinance
2. Signs legally erected, but whose use has ceased, or the structure upon which the
display is placed has been abandoned by its owner, not maintained, or not used to
identify or advertise an ongoing business for a period of more than thirty (30) days.
3. Signs legally erected which later become nonconforming as a result of the adoption
of an ordinance, on which the amortization period for the display provided by the
ordinance rendering the display nonconforming has expired.
4. Signs which are a danger to the public or are unsafe.
5. Signs which are a traffic hazard not created by the relocation of streets or highways
or by acts of the City or County.
The storage, discharge, handling, maintenance, use or otherwise dealings with hazardous
substances, as defined by applicable state or federal laws or regulations when:
1. In violation of federal, state or local laws or regulations.
2. In such a manner to affect in any way air or water quality.
3. In such a manner as to create an identifiable risk of accidental release of the
substances, which release might adversely affect the health, safety or welfare of
persons, property damage, or adversely after air or water quality.
J. Vehicle(s) as defined by the California Vehicle Code for sale at a parcel not approved for
such use by the City.
K. Any condition as to he detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare or in such
manner as to constitute a public nuisance as defined by Section 3480 of the California Civil
Code.
L. Any of the conditions described in this chapter which exist on a property and are not visible
from a public street, but the City has received more than one complaint.
8.04.060 Removal of Graffiti.
Whenever the Code Enforcement Officer determines that graffiti is so located on public or privately
owned structures on public or privately owned real property within this City so as to he capable of
being viewed by persons utilizing any public right-of-way in this City, the Code Enforcement
Officer is authorized to provide for the removal of the graffiti solely at the City's expense, without
reimbursement from the property owner upon whose property the graffiti has been applied, upon
the following conditions:
A. The painting or repair is limited to the area reasonably required to remove the graffiti.
B. The removal of graffiti as authorized by this Chapter may be performed only after securing
the consent of the public entity having jurisdiction over the structure, and in the case of a
privately owned structure, only after securing the consent of the owner.
Nothing in 8.04.060 shall preclude the use of the other provisions of this Chapter in the removal of
graffiti when necessary.
February 2, 1993 Page 7
ORDINANCE NO. -- Community Beautification Ordinance
8.04.070 Declaration of Public Nuisance.
Any property found to he maintained in violation of 8.04.050 is hereby declared to be a public
nuisance and shall he abated by rehabilitation, removal, demolition, or repair pursuant to the
procedures set forth herein. The procedures for abatement set forth herein shall not he exclusive
and shall not in any manner limit or restrict the City from enforcing other City ordinances or
abating public nuisance in any other manner provided by law. Abatement shall normally he in
accordance with procedures set forth in the chapter.
Whenever the Code Enforcement Officer finds that a nuisance, as defined by Section 8.04.050,
exists on any premises located within the City, he or she shall advise the property owner, lessee or
occupant of the property on which the nuisance is located of the nuisance and direct that the
nuisance he abated. The property owner, lessee or occupant shall be notified of the existence of
the alleged nuisance in accordance with Section 8.04.100. The notification shall detail the
violations and establish a reasonable abatement period which shall not he less than ten (10) days.
8.04.080 Emergency Abatement.
When a public nuisance constitutes an immediate hazard or threat of harm and the situation calls for
abatement sooner than the abatement procedures in this chapter otherwise allow, the Code
Enforcement Officer may take or cause emergency abatement of such nuisance with such notice to
parties concerned, or without notice, as the particular circumstance reasonably allows.
8.04.090 Right of Entry.
The Code Enforcement Officer, or designated assistants, deputies, employees or contracting agents
may enter upon the land for posting or serving notice, or, also, for abating any such public
nuisance and violations as provided in this chapter.
Whenever necessary to make an inspection to enforce any of the provisions of this chapter, or
wherever the City Code Enforcement Officer has reasonable cause to believe that there exists in any
building or upon any premises any condition or violation of this Chapter, the Code Enforcement
Officer or authorized representative may enter said building or premises at all reasonable times to
inspect the same or to perform any duty imposed upon the Code Enforcement Officer by this
chapter; provided that if such building or premises be occupied, the officer shall first present
proper credentials and request entry; and if such building or premises be unoccupied, the officer
shall first make a reasonable effort to locate the owner or other persons having charge or control of
the building or premises and request entry. If such entry is refused, the officer or authorized
representative shall have recourse to every remedy provided by law to secure entry and to enforce
the provisions of this Ordinance including the abatement of existing nuisances.
8.04.100 Service of Notices and Order to Abate.
Service of notice under this chapter shall be made:
A. By personal service on the owner, occupant or person in charge or control of the property;
or
B. By posting a notice in a conspicuous place on or in front of the property in question and
then by sending a copy of said notice by registered or certified mail addressed to the owner
at the last known address of said owner. If there is no known address for the owner, the
notice shall he sent to the property address. "Owner" as used herein means any person(s)
shown as the property owner on the latest equalized property tax assessment rolls.
February2, 1993 Page 8
ORDINANCE NO. -- Community Beautification Ordinance
8.04.110 Voluntary Abatement of Nuisance.
The owner, lessee or occupant of any building, structure or property alleged to be a nuisance under
the provisions of the Chapter may abate the nuisance at any time within the abatement period
provided in Section 8.04.070 by rehabilitation, repair, removal, or demolition. The owner, lessee,
or occupant shall advise the designated enforcement officer of the abatement. Once so advised, the
officer shall inspect the premises to insure that the nuisance has, in fact, been abated.
8.04.120 Failure to Voluntarily Abate a Declared Nuisance.
If the alleged nuisance is not voluntarily abated within the period established under the provisions
of Section 8.04.070, the property owner, lessee or occupant shall he subject to involuntary
abatement in accordance with the procedures set below.
8.04.130 Notice of Intention to Abate Public Nuisance and Public
Hearing Thereon.
The Notice of Intention to Abate Public Nuisance described in Section 8.04.070 shall demand that
the proper owner, lessee or occupant, remedy or abate such public nuisance within a reasonable
period of time which shall not he less than ten (10) days. It shall also give notice of the owner's
right to a hearing before the Community Preservation Committee. Such hearing shall normally
only be granted if any interested party requests, in writing to the City Clerk, a hearing prior to the
date abatement was to be completed. The hearing shall he held at a time and date not less than
seven (7) days nor more than thirty (30) days of the receipt of the request for hearing. Said notice
shall also state that no appeal to the City Council will he accepted unless an appeal to the
Community Preservation Committee is first made. Once a hearing is requested by the property
owner, lessee or occupant, notice of the date, time and place of the hearing may he sent by the City
by first class mail postage prepaid.
8.04.140 Hearing by Community Preservation Committee.
At the time and place stated in the notice of public hearing, the Community Preservation Committee
shall hear and consider all relevant evidence, objections or protests, and shall receive testimony of
owners, lessee, occupants, witnesses, city personnel and interested persons relative to such alleged
public nuisance and to proposed abatement measures. If the alleged public nuisance is in a City -
identified neighborhood of one of the Committee members an alternate Committee member shall be
used for the hearing. The hearing may he continued from time to time. Three (3) members of the
Committee shall constitute a quorum. The decision of the Committee shall he made by a majority
of the quorum present and hearing the evidence.
8.04.150 Decision of the Community Preservation Committee.
Following the public hearing, the Community Preservation Committee shall consider all evidence
and determine whether the premises, or any part of the premises, or property constitutes a public
nuisance as alleged. If the Community Preservation Committee finds that a public nuisance does
exist and that there is sufficient cause to abate the nuisance, the Committee shall make a written
order setting forth those findings and ordering the owner, lessee, occupant, or other person having
charge or control of the premises to abate the nuisance by rehabilitation, repair or demolition in the
manner and by the means specifically set forth in the Community Preservation Committee order.
The order shall state that if the nuisance is not abated, it will he removed, and the nuisance abated
by the City. The order shall state that the cost of removal will be assessed upon the property from
which the nuisance is removed and will constitute a lien upon the property until paid. The order
February 2, 1993 Page 9
ORDINANCE NO. -- Community Beautification Ordinance
shall set forth the time within which the work shall be commenced and completed. The
Committee's order shall he made within five (5) days of the hearing.
8.04.160 Service of the Abatement Order.
Within five (5) days following the Community Preservation Committee's decision, the property
owner, lessee, occupant or the person having charge or control of the premises, shall be served
with a copy of the written order of the Community Preservation Committee. Service may he made
by posting in the United States mail first class postage prepaid. Service shall he deemed complete
five (5) days after mailing.
8.04.170 Abatement by Property Owner.
The property owner, lessee, occupant, or person having charge or control of the property, may, at
his or her own expense, abate the nuisance as prescribed by the order of the Community
Preservation Committee prior to the expiration of the abatement period set forth in the order. If the
nuisance has been inspected by the enforcement officer and has been abated in accordance with the
order, proceedings shall be terminated.
8.04.180 Abatement by the City.
If the declared nuisance is not completely abated by the owner, lessee, occupant, or person having
charge or control of the property within the time prescribed in the Community Preservation
Committee's order, the Code Enforcement Officer, or any other designated City official, is
authorized and directed to cause the nuisance to be abated by City forces or private contract. In
furtherance of this section, the Code Enforcement Officer or any designated agent is expressly
authorized to enter upon the premises for the purpose of abating the nuisance.
8.04.190 Cost of Abatement.
Where the Code Enforcement Officer or a duly authorized representative and/or the City Attorney is
required to cause the abatement of the public nuisance pursuant to the provisions of this chapter,
the Officer shall keep an accounting of the cost thereof, including incidental expenses for the
abatement. "Costs and incidental expenses" includes, hut is not limited to: the actual expenses and
costs of the City in the preparation of notices, specification and contracts; inspection or the work;
any attorney's fees expended in the abatement of the nuisance, through civil action or otherwise; all
costs and expenses for which the City may he liahle under state law arising from or related to the
nuisance abatement action; and all costs or expenses to which the City may be entitled pursuant to
Health and Safety Code Section 510 and other statutory entitlements. Costs or expenses for which
the City may he reimhursed shall begin to accrue at the time the City first receives a complaint
regarding a problem on the property. Costs and expenses may he recovered even if the nuisance is
corrected prior to a nuisance abatement hearing or an appeal hearing.
8.04.200 Record of Cost for Abatement.
A. The Code Enforcement Officer or such other City official as may he designated, shall keep
an account of the costs (including incidental expenses) of abating such nuisance on each
separate lot or parcel of land where the work is done and shall render an itemized report, in
writing to the Community Preservation Committee, showing the cost of abatement and the
rehabilitation, demolishing or repairing of the premises, building or structures, less any
salvage value relating thereto; provided, that before the report is submitted to the
Community Preservation Committee, a copy of same shall he served in accordance with the
provisions of Section 8.04.100 together with a notice of the time when the report shall be
February 2, 1993 Page 10
ORDINANCE NO. -- Community Beautification Ordinance
heard by the Community Preservation Committee for confirmation. A copy of the report
and notice shall he posted for at least three (3) days prior to its submission to the
Community Preservation Committee on or near the door to the City Council chambers.
B. The Community Preservation Committee shall set the matter for hearing to determine the
correctness and reasonableness of such costs.
8.04.210 Cost Report -- Hearing and Proceedings.
At the time and place fixed for receiving and considering the cost report, the Community
Preservation Committee shall hear and pass upon the report of such costs of abatement, together
with any objections or protests. Thereupon, the Community Preservation Committee may make
such revision, correction or modification in the cost report as it may deem just, after which, by
motion, the report, as submitted or revised, corrected or modified, shall he confirmed. The
decision of the Community Preservation Committee on all protests and objections which may be
made, shall be final and conclusive.
8.04.220 Assessment of Costs Against Property.
The total cost for abating such nuisance, as confirmed by the Community Preservation Committee,
shall constitute a special assessment against the respective lot or parcel of land to which it relates,
and upon recordation in the office of the County Recorder of a notice of lien as so made and
confirmed, shall constitute a lien on the property for the amount of such assessment, pursuant to
the provisions of Government Code Section 38773.5.
A. After such confirmation and recordation, a copy shall be filed with the assessor and tax
collector of Riverside County, acting for the City in order that said County officials may
add amounts of the respective assessments to the next regular tax bills levied against the
respective lots and parcels of land, and thereafter said amounts shall be collected at the
same time and in the same manner as ordinary municipal taxes are collected and shall he
subject to the same procedure under foreclosure and sale in case of delinquency as provided
for ordinary municipal taxes; or
B. After such recordation, such lien may he foreclosed by judicial or other sale in the manner
and means provided by law;
C. Such notice of lien shall he in the form as required by this Code, law or regulation.
8.04.230 Violations.
A. In lieu of or in addition to the proceedings for abatement set forth in this chapter, any one
of the following may he prosecuted through the criminal process.
1 Any owner, lessee, occupant, or other person having charge or control of any such
buildings, or premises, who maintains any public nuisance defined in this Chapter,
and who fails to comply with the Order of Abatement served as provided in Section
8.04.100.
2. Any person who removes any notice or order posted as required in this Chapter, for
the purpose of interfering with the enforcement of the provisions of this Chapter.
3. Any person who obstructs, impedes or interferes with any representative of the City
or with any person who owns, leases or occupies property when any of the
February 2, 1993 Page 11
ORDINANCE NO. -- Community Beautification Ordinance
aforementioned individuals are lawfully engaged in proceedings involving the
abatement of a nuisance under this Chapter.
B. Any person violating any of the provisions of 8.04.230 A. 1, 2, or 3 shall be guilty of an
infraction and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by:
1. A tine not exceeding fifty dollars ($50.00) for the first violation;
2. A fine not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100.00) for the second violation within
one year;
3. A fine not exceeding two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) for each additional
violation within one year.
C. Each day such a violation is committed or permitted to continue shall constitute a separate
offense.
8.04.240 Grievance with Final Order -- Appeal to City Council.
Whenever any person is aggrieved by any final order of the Community Preservation Committee
issued pursuant to Section 8.04.150 or the confirmation of an assessment pursuant to Section
8.04.200, such person may appeal to the City Council.
A The appeal and any required fee shall he filed with the City Clerk within five working days
following the service of the order of the Community Preservation Committee. The appeal
shall be in writing and shall state the grounds for the appeal.
B. The City Clerk shall set the matter for a hearing before the City Council at a date and time
not less than ten (10) nor more than thirty (30) days following the filing of the appeal.
The City Clerk shall then notify the appellant, by mail, of the date and time of the hearing
as set forth in Section 8.04.100. The City Council may continue the hearing date where
necessary.
C. The City Council shall charge a fee, as set by City Council resolution, for the processing of
an appeal.
8.04.250 City Council Action.
A. At the time and place set forth for such hearing, the City Council shall review the decision
of the Community Preservation Committee and shall afford the appellant with a reasonable
opportunity to be heard in connection therewith.
The Council shall follow established rules of procedure for the conduct of hearing appeals.
If the City Council finds from the relevant evidence presented at the hearing that the action
taken was in conformity with the provisions of the Code, it shall require compliance with
the order of abatement within thirty (30) days after the mailing of a copy of its order to the
affected property owner unless a period of time in excess of thirty days is specifically
authorized within which to abate the nuisance.
D. If the nuisance is not abated within the thirty (30) day period or within such longer period
as the Council may provide, the Code Enforcement Officer is expressly authorized and
directed to enter upon the premises for the purpose of abating the nuisance.
February 2, 1993 Page 12
ORDINANCE NO. -- Community Beautification Ordinance
E. The City Council action is final.
FEES, PROCEDURES AND TIME FRAMES
The City Council shall by resolution establish certain fees and approve specific procedures and
reasonable time frames for this Ordinance not otherwise stated herein. The limitations of California
Code of Civil Procedures Section 1094.6 shall apply to any review of an administrative decision
made hereunder,
VALIDITY
The San Jacinto City Council hereby declares that should any section, paragraph, sentence or word
of this Ordinance or of the City Municipal Code hereby adopted be declared for any reason to be
invalid, it is the intent of the City Council that it would have passed all other portions of this
Ordinance independent of the elimination here from of any such portion as may be declared invalid.
DATE OF EFFECT
This Ordinance shall take effect and he in force from and after its approval as required by law.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to he published in
a newspaper of general circulation and published in the County of Riverside, State of California.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 19th day of January, 1993.
MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 2nd
day of February, 1993 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF SAN
JACINTO
I, Maurice Armster, City Clerk of the City of San Jacinto, do hereby certify that the
foregoing is a true copy of Ordinance No. duly adopted by the City Council of the City of
San Jacinto at a regular meeting thereof held the 2nd day of February, 1993.
February 2, 1993 Page 13
ORDINANCE NO. -- Community Beautification Ordinance
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Jacinto this day of
February, 1993.
City Clerk
February 2. 1993 Page 14
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
Staff Report
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
FROM: Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief/Building Official
DATE: January 19, 1993
SUBJECT: Fire Related Fees and Charges Resolution
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution which sets the amounts of fees and charges as determined by
Ordinance No. 976.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council introduced Ordinance No. 976 at its January 5th, 1993 meeting. If
this Ordinance is adopted at the Council meeting of January 19th, 1993, it will establish
and justify certain fees and charges. This recommended resolution sets the amounts of
those fees and charges.
The City adopted the 1988 Uniform Fire Code and other fire related codes and
standards as Ordinance No. 917 on November 20. 1990. Ordinance No. 917 also
established certain fees and charges and Resolution No 1909 established the amounts of
those fees. Most of the recommended fees in the proposed resolution are slightly higher
than those fees and charges adopted in 1990. However, these changes are based on the
increased cost of the providing services (using current budgeted costs) since 1990 and
the recommendations by a User Fee Study conducted by the City. Two significant
points need to be made:
1. No new fees are recommended at this time.
2. The Fire Mitigation Fees for new residential and
commercial/industrial development remain the same as
established in 1990.
A User Fee Study of all Fire and Life Safety Department functions was accomplished by
David M. Griffith and Associates (DMG) in January 1993 as part of the City-wide
study. This study carefully analyzed the costs of providing services and made several
recommendations. Several of the fees in this resolution are based on the
Page 1
Fire Related Fees and Charges Resolution Staff Report
recommendations of the user fee study. Wherever the fee study recommendation is
used in this resolution, it is noted.
The summary sheet of the User Fee Study for the Fire Department is attached to this
staff report. This summary sheet shows the current fees being charged and the
recommended fees being proposed in this resolution. The sheet also shows what it
currently costs to provide these services and the relationship between the amount
charged and the amount collected.
Other Fire Prevention fees are based on the total cost of the Fire Prevention Program
and broken down to an hourly rate:
Salary and benefits of the Fire Prevention Inspector $73,402
Secretary (25% of salary and benefits) 9,164
Engine Company Personnel 20,000
Fire Department Administration (20%) 27,268
Miscellaneous Costs (office supplies, printing, etc) 10.000
Total Cost of the Program (1993-1994) $139,834
The 1990 Fire Prevention Program costs were $93,076. Using the total cost of the
City's Fire Prevention Program and then dividing it by the estimated hours worked in
fire prevention, an hourly fee can be determined.
San Jacinto Fire Prevention Program Hourly Costs
$139,834 annual cost divided by 1,800 hours per year = $78.00 per hour
The justification for these fees and charges came partially from the Fire Department's
2010 Strategic Plan in 1990. Following is an excerpt (updated in 1992) from the Fire
Department's 2010 Strategic Plan:
FUNDING POLICY OF THE SAN JACINTO FIRE DEPARTMENT
Unfortunately, traditional sources of General Fund revenues are decreasing and, in
some cases, being eliminated. This, coupled with the expensive labor intensive nature
of fire protection, makes it increasingly important to develop new sources of funding
for Fire Department services. Several forces contribute to shrinking revenues and
budget crunches:
1. Money is not coming in from taxpayers like it used to before Proposition 13.
Page 2
Fire Related Fees and Charges Resolution Staff Report
2. The cost of government is going up because the cost of providing services has
been going up.
The demand for services has stayed at least the same and in most cases has
increased.
The taxpayers in increasing numbers are blaming government and its cost for
taxpayers, local government is an accessible point of attack, much easier than
government at other levels.
The State of California's budget crisis is significantly impacting local
governments.
San Jacinto Fire Department 2010 Strategic Plan
RECOMMENDATION # 4:
The funding policy of the San Jacinto Fire Department should be to
minimize the Fire Department's dependency on traditional funding
sources by developing new fees and charges. It should be the policy
to finance its operations by more closely associating the costs of a
specific service with those who most benefit from that service.
The fire department's philosophy is that fees should be charged for all operations that
require resources above the "basic" level of service provided. The following fee
alternatives show those three areas of service that will best support this philosophy
through the development and implementation of fees for specific specialized services.
These three areas are:
• New development impact fees (capital)
• Cost recovery for emergency services
San Jacinto Fire Department 2010 Strategic Plan
RECOMMENDATION #6:
The City of San Jacinto should have a "Cost Recovery Ordinance" to
recover costs for emergencies that go beyond the fire department's
"normal" reponse and are caused by neligent or malicious acts.
Page 3
Fire Related Fees and Charges Resolution Staff Report
"These include, but are not limited to, the extinguishment of malicious intent
fires, unattended or out of control permit fires, fires caused by negligent acts,
and fires which originated outside the corporate limits of the City and are
brought into the City for extinguishment. Other emergency services which fees
should be charged are the control and clean-up of hazardous material spills and
accidents (in addition to all Riverside County costs) and any emergency caused by
driving under the influence (already in place and administered by the police
department)."
Fire prevention
"The City Council and the community objected to charging a fee for regular
business fire prevention inspections. The recommended fee schedule takes this
into account by eliminating all fire prevention inspection fees until a pre -citation
letter is issued (normally on the third visit to an occupancy due to non-
compliance with the original fire inspection). The fire department feels that two
visits to one occupancy per year may be considered as "basic" services by the fire
prevention bureau, but the third and fourth times are beyond a normal level of
service and cause the public to pay for an occupancy's lack of compliance."
Page 4
FIRE DEPARTMENT
UNIT
VOLUME
CURRENT
FEE
User Fee Study Summary Sheet
60% OF
FULL COST
Per Unit information
80% OF
FULL COST
100% OF
FULL COST
CURRENT
SUBSIDY
1 PLAN REVIEWS
100
$112
$90
$120
$150
$30
$150
,
$0
2 SITE INSPECTIONS
40
$66
$79
$105
$131
$63
$120
$11
3 FIRE PROTECTION CHECKS
20
$120
$97
$130
$162
$42
$160
$2
4 HOOD DUCT INSPECTION
10
$90
$67
$89
$112
$22
5110
$2
5 WATER SYSTEM F LOW TEST
24
$45
$60
$80
$99
$54
$75
$24
6 TANK INSTALLATION
10
$90
$65
$67
$100
$18
$100
$8
7 TANK REMOVAL
10
$68
$123
$163
$204
$136
$120
$84
B SPECIAL INSPECTION
24
$45
$39
$52
$64
$19
$60
$4
9 LICENSED CARE FACIL. (I-6)
10
$0
$65
$86
$108
$108
$51
$58
10 LICENSED CARE FACIL. (7-49)
5
s $45
$97
$130
$162
$117
- $10(
$62
11 LICENSED CARE FAOL.(50+)
2
$68
$130
$173
$217
$149
$15t
$67
12 BUSINESS INSPECTIONS
450
$0
$69
$92
$115
$115
$1151
$0
13 SPRAY BOOTHS
10
$102
$61
$82
$102
$0
$102
SO
14 UFC PMT - GENERAL
10
$25
$49
$65
$81
$56
$50
$31
15 UFC PMT - BONFIRE
10
$0
$47
$62
$76
$78
$50
$28
16 UFC PMT - HAZ MATEFIAL
10
$45
$47
$62
$78
$33
$75
$3
17 UFC PMT - HAZ MAT'L PROD.
5
$45
$47
$62
$78
$33
$75
$3
18 UFC PMT - HIGH STORAGE
2
$45
$47
$62
$78
$33
$75
53
19 WEED ABATEMENT
1
$75,000
$63,533
$84,710
$105,888
$30,888
$75,000
$30,888
20 FALSE ALARMS
50
$25
$15
$20
$25
$0
$25
$0
21 RESIDENIIALSPRINKLERINSP.
400
$122
$130
$173
$216
$94
$150
$66
22 HAZ MAT RESPONSES
6
$0
$130
$174
$217
$217
$210
$7
23 COUNTER/TELEPHONE
1
$0
$12,964
$17,285
521,606
$21,606
$0
$21.806
24 MEETINGS & CONFERENCES
1
50
$17,075
$22,767
$26,459
$26,459
$0
$26,459
25 NON FEE ACTIVITY
1
$0
$323,479
$431,306
- $539,132
` $539,132
$0
$539,132
# Actual fee structure: Existing system - $60. New system - $125.
Cq Activity presented on a total program basis. Actual charge is contractor's fee + $140 or 25% of contractor's fee, whichever is greater.
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR CERTAIN
SERVICES PERFORMED FOR AND OR BY THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO FIRE
DEPARTMENT AND THE MITIGATION OF THE IMPACTS OF NEW
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE CITY OF SAN
JACINTO FIRE DEPARTMENT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto has adopted a "Fire Protection
Ordinance," Ordinance No. 976, establishing a Fire and Safety Inspection Program, setting certain
fees and adopting the Uniform Fire Code, 1991 Edition, with certain amendments, the Uniform
Fire Code Standards, 1991 Edition, and the National Fire Protection Association Standards 13,
1991 Edition, 13-D, 1991 Edition, and 13-R, 1991 Edition; and
WHEREAS, the declared intent of the City Council requires the San Jacinto Fire
Department to associate the costs of a specific service with the limited number of persons who
most benefit from that service; and
WHEREAS, the cost of rendering such services should he borne by the beneficiaries of
such service; and
WHEREAS, the San Jacinto Fire Department has duly proposed and made available to the
City Council and to the public, data indicating the estimated cost of providing such services; and
WHEREAS, because new development does and will continue to adversely impact the
City's Fire Department, the City Council further finds and determines that unless fees are imposed
on new residential and commercial and industrial development within the City to finance the needed
facilities and improvements identified by the City, such new development will adversely affect the
public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of San Jacinto; and
WHEREAS, the Fire Department mitigation fee collected pursuant to this Resolution shall
be used to finance the tire facilities, equipment and improvements which are needed as a result of
new development; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was been held on January 19th, 1993, concerning the
schedule of fees and charges.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO that it hereby approves the fees and charges for the San
Jacinto Fire Department as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, and that
said fees and charges shall be in full force and effect upon the effective date of Ordinance No. 976.
MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 1993.
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
January 79, 1993 Page 1
Fire Department Fees and Charges Resolution - RESOLUTION NO.
CERTIFICATE
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. duly adopted by the said City
Council of the said City of San Jacinto on the date therein set forth.
City Clerk
January 19, 1993 Page 2
EXHIBIT A
San Jacinto Fire and Life Safety Department
Fee and Charges Schedule - 1993-94
The following fees shall he paid to the City of San Jacinto and deposited into the appropriate City
fund. The Fire Chief may authorize the refunding of any fee paid hereunder which was
erroneously paid or collected.
A User Fee Study of all Fire and Life Safety Department functions was accomplished by David M.
Griffith and Associates (DMG) in January 1993. This study carefully analyzed the costs of
providing services and made several recommendations which have been adopted by this resolution.
Several of the fees in this resolution are based on the recommendations of this fee study.
Wherever the Fee Study recommendation is ued in this resolution, it is noted. The Fee Study is
available for review from the Fire and Life Safety Department.
Other Fire Prevention fees are based on the total cost of the Fire Prevention Program and broken
down to an hourly rate:
Salary and benefits of the Fire Prevention Inspector
Secretary (25% of salary and benefits)
Engine Company Personnel
Fire Department Administration (20%)
Miscellaneous Costs (office supplies, printing, etc)
Total Cost of the Program (1993-1994)
$73,402
9,164
20,000
27,268
10.000
$139,834
San Jacinto Fire Department Fee
$139,834 annual cost divided by 1,800 hours per year = S78.00 per hour
1
Miscellaneous Fire Prevention Fees - Per Activity:
The following fees were determined by DMG User Fee Study
recommendations:
Plans Review (flat fee) - A, B, E, H, or I occupancies
Site Inspections (where required)
Fire Protection System, plan check, and
inspection
"Hood -duct" system plan check and inspection
S150.00
S 120.00
$160.00 + $0.50
per sprinkler
head
$110.00
January 19, 1993 Page 3
"EXHIBITS" To Fire Related Fees and Charges Resolution
Follow-up Inspection for "Non-compliance" $78.00
Water system now test $75.00
Tank installation (plan check, permit, and inspection) - per tank $ 1 00 .0 0
Removal of tank - per tank $120.00
Special inspection (access, clearance, housekeeping, etc) $60.00
Spray Booth (existing sprinkler building) $60.00
Spray Booth (new system) $1 25.00
Fire Alarm System Plan Check:
1-6 Devices
7-21 Devices
22-50 Devices
50 or more Devices
$60.00
$75.00
$140.00
$140.00 + $1.00
per device over
50
2. Licensed Care Facility Fire Safety Inspection Fees:
The following fees were determined by DMG User Fee Study
recommendations:
Any Occupancy Which Requires a License From the State including Residential Care facilities,
Children Day -Care Facilities, Convalescent Homes, etc. (I Occupancies)
Annual Inspections for Licensed Care Facilities
6 or Less Tenants/Occupants S50.00
7 to 49 Tenants/Occupants $ 1 0 0 . 0 0
50 or more Tenants/Occupants $150.00
Inspection for Change in License $50.00
Follow-up Inspection No Fee
Non-compliance Inspection Same S as Annual
Citation 2X $ Non-compliance
3. Fire Prevention and Safety Inspection Fees:
The following fees were determined by Fire Prevention Costs:
Retail and Commercial Buildings:
January 19, 7993 Page 4
"EXHIBITS" To Fire Related Fees and Charges Resolution
(Drinking and dining establishments having an occupant load of less than 50; wholesale and retail
stores; office buildings; printing shops; municipal police and fire stations; factories and workshops
using materials not highly flammable or combustible; factories and workshops using
noncombustible or nonexplosive materials; storage and sales rooms for combustible goods; paint
stores without bulk handling; ice plants; power plants; pumping plants; cold storage; gasoline
service stations; garages where no repair work is done except exchange of parts and maintenance
requiring no open flames, welding, or flammable or combustible materials. (B Occupancies))
Initial and Annual Inspection No Fee
Follow-up Inspection No Fee
Non -Compliance Inspection Fee:
Less than 1,500 Square Feet
1,500 to 2,999 Square Feet
3,000 through 4,999 Square Feet
5,000 or More Square Feet
$78.00
$117.00
S156.00
$195.00
Citation Same $ as Non-compliiance
Manufacturing and Industrial:
(Occupancies storing, handling, using or selling hazardous and highly flammable materials; dry
cleaning plants; paint stores with bulk handling; paint shops and spray painting rooms and shops;
wood working establishments; planning mills; box factories; buffing rooms for tire rebuilding
plants; shops, factories, or warehouses where loose combustible fibers or dust are manufactured,
processed, generated or stored; repair garages; semiconductor fabrication facilities and comparable
research and development areas. (H Occupancies))
Initial and Annual Inspection
Follow-up Inspection
No Fee
No Fee
Non -Compliance Inspection Fee S156.00
Citation S 156.00
Places of Assembly:
(The gathering together of 50 or more persons for such purposes as deliberation, education,
instruction, worship, entertainment, amusement, in. drinking or dining establishments, or awaiting
transportation. (A and E Occupancies))
Initial and Annual Inspections
Follow-up Inspection
Non -Compliance Inspection Fee:
50 to 100 Occupants
101 to 300 Occupants
No Fee
No Fee
S78.00
$117.00
January 19, 1993 Page 5
"EXHIBITS" To Fire Related Fees and Charges Resolution
Over 300 Occupants $156.00
Citation Same $ as Non-compliance
Hotels, Motels, Apartments:
Initial and Annual Inspection No Fee
Follow-up Inspection No Fee
Non -Compliance Inspection Fee: $78.00/story
Citation $78.00/story
Mobile home/RV Park:
Initial and Annual Inspection No Fee
Follow-up Inspection No Fee
Non -Compliance Inspection Fee $78.00
Citation $78.00
4. Uniform Fire Code (UFC) Permit Fees:
The following fees were determined by DMG User Fee Study
recommendations:
General fee for UFC permit if not listed
Bon fires or tumbleweed fires
Hazardous materials
Hazardous material production
High piled combustible storage
Spraying or dipping operations
$50.00
No Fee
$75.00
$75.00
$75.00
$75.00
5. Weed Abatement:
The following fees were determined by Fire Prevention Costs:
General weed abatement fees:
1st Notice No Fee
2nd Notice $78.00
3rd Notice Cost + S156.00 or
25% administrative
fee, whichever is more
6. Fire Watch Actual Personnel and
Equipment cost
January 19, 1993 Page 6
"EXHIBITS" To Fire Related Fees and Charges Resolution
7. Standby Actual Personnel and
Equipment cost
8. Fire Company Inspections and Re -inspections No Fee
9. Incident Report copy
10. Inspection Report copy
11. False Alarms
$7.50 for 1st 5 pages
+ $0.25 per page after
5 pages
$7.50 for 1st 5 pages
+ $0.25 per page after
5 pages
$98 after 1 in 30 days;
after 2 in 90 days;
after 3 in 180 days; or,
after 4 in one year
12. San Jacinto Fire Prevention Standards
13. Cost Recovery Fees:
Equipment Cost Recovery:
Charged per minute from time alarm received up to "in quarters" time.
30 minutes minimum charge.
Fire engine (at $150 per hour)
Squad (at $10) per hour)
Staff/Command vehicle (at $75 per hour)
S2.50 per minute
$1.67 per minute
S1.25 per minute
Staffing Cost Recovery:
Charged per minute from time alarm received up to "in quarters" time.
30 minutes minimum charge.
S15.00
Captain $0.4439 per minute
Engineer $0.3734 per minute
Firefighter $0.3221 per minute
Fire Chief $0.8745 per minute
Additional Personnel Costs:
Company Officer Add 30 minutes for report writing
Firelighter and Engineers Add 30 minutes per firefighter for
clean up of equipment and
apparatus
January 19, 1993 Page 7
"EXHIBITS" To Fire Related Fees and Charges Resolution
14. Fire Department Mitigation Fees:
Residential S577 per Unit
Industrial or Commercial $0.34 per square foot
January 19, 1993 Page 8
TO:
FROM:
City of San Jacinto
Staff Report
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Ross Chadwick, Fire Chief/Building Official/
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
DATE: January 19, 1993
SUBJECT: Building and Construction Related Fees and
Charges Resolution
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution which sets the amounts of fees and charges as determined by
Ordinance No. 975.
BACKGROUND:
The City Council introduced Ordinance No. 975 at its January 5th, 1993 meeting.
If this Ordinance is adopted at the Council meeting of January 19th, 1993, it will
establish and justify certain building related fees and charges. This recommended
resolution sets the amounts of those fees and charges.
The City adopted the 1988 Uniform Building Code and related codes and
standards as Ordinance No. 893 on January 16th, 1990. Ordinance No. 893 also
established certain fees and charges and the amounts of those fees. The
recommended fees and charges in this resolution have increased somewhat;
however, the changes are based on the increased cost of the providing services
(using current budgeted costs) since 1990 and the recommendations for various
permit fees by the 1991 Uniform Administrative Code (proposed for adoption by
Ordinance No. 975).
Attached to this report is a comparison of development fees and building related
fees of cities in Riverside County in June of 1992. The study was conducted by
Riverside County and is called, "Comparative Analysis: Land Use Development
Fees of the County of Riverside Compared to the Cities Within County of
Riverside and Selected Counties Within California." As you can see, the City of
San Jacinto is near the low end of the amount of fees charged for development
Page 1
and construction. In addition, many of the cities (including Hemet) in this
comparison have already adopted the new codes and established new fees which
are in most cases higher.
Staff has proposed a new fee which is a "Fire and Life Safety Service Fee." This
fee is proposed at 0.10% of valuation and recovers costs for contractor license
verification, our new computer permit tracking program and any other
equipment needed to more effectively and efficiently meet the needs of
developers and contractors. Our new computer system will significantly reduce
the amount of the time it takes to issue permits and dramatically improve the
tracking process, which in turn will save the building community money.
Currently, the City charges a fee of 0.05% of valuation for contractor license
verification. Therefore, the proposed increase is 0.05% of valuation. For
example, the Fire and Life Safety Service Fee for a house valued at $100,000
would be $100.00, an increase of $50.00 from the current fee for contractor
license verification.
Exhibit "B" of the resolution, page 14, shows the special funds fees, namely:
Water Capital Improvement Fee; Sewer Connection Fee; Public Safety Capital
Improvement Fund; Storm Drain Improvements; and the Signalization Fee and
Lighting, Landscape, Maintenance District. These fees remain the same as we
currently charge.
It is important that the City of San Jacinto consider the economic situation in the
State of California and the continued plight of developers and builders when we
adjust any fees. It was with this in mind that staff carefully weighed the costs of
providing services and the need to recover our costs whenever possible. San
Jacinto is still significantly below the City of Hemet and Riverside County with
these new fees and charges.
Page 2
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS: LAND USE DEVELOPMENT FEES
OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
COMPARED TO THE CITIES WITHIN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
AND SELECTED COUNTIES WITHIN CALIFORNIA
PREPARED FOR THE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
BY
THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
OF THE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
JUNE 25, 1992
Fees for schools, special districts, and other special governments not under the auspices of
the County or a city were omitted. The focus of the survey was to compare only those fees
charged by general governments for processing land use development projects.
The following is a listing of the participants:
COUNTIES CITIES
RIVERSIDE BEA UMONT
IMPERIAL CA LIMESA
LOS ANGELES CATHEDRAL CITY
ORANGE CORONA
SAN BERNARDINO HEMET
SAN DIEGO INDIAN WELLS
LA QUINTA
LAKE ELSINORE
MORENO VALLEY
PALM DESERT
PALM SPRINGS
RANCHO MIRAGE
RIVERSIDE
SAN JACINTO
The survey data was translated into total project costs for clarity. Therefore, to obtain an
estimated unit cost from the total fee, divide the total project cost by fifty units.
2
INTRODUCTION
This report was prepared to provide a comparison of how land use development fees relate
in magnitude among local cities within the County of Riverside including the County. A
county -to -county comparison was also included for selected counties within Southern
California. This report does not purport or intend to imply that the fees shown herein
represent the exact cost for any particular project or unit within an individual project. The
County of Riverside is unable to attest to the validity or the reliability of the data presented
in the "Comparative Analysis," because participating agencies may have applied a unique
interpretation to the hypothetical subdivision. In addition, County staff made assumptions
which were applied to all agencies that may have affected how the data was presented.
Questionnaires were sent to planning and building officials in all twenty-four cities within
Riverside County, seeking their participation in the survey, and to the counties within the
Southern California Association of Governments (except Ventura) and San Diego County.
Just over one-half of the cities (Table 1) responded and the six Southern California counties
responded, including Riverside County (Table 2). Also, information on five cities not
responding to the current survey was retained from the Fiscal Year 1990-91 survey. While
this information is out of date (one year old) it is beneficial to the overall comparison of
fees. The survey participation goal of ninety percent was not reached.
It is believed that this type of survey is useful in the land use decision -making process when
decision makers (elected officials) are considering setting individual fee levels for recovering
the cost of a particular service, such as plan checking or case processing, or the mitigation
of development. However, ranking the results (Table 3) can be misleading and this
information can easily be misinterpreted. The summary listing (Table 4A and 4B) shows
the rankings of total fees that should be judged only after considering the variables such as
are shown in Exhibits A, B, and C.
Difficulty is experienced when conducting surveys of this type. Each agency (city or county)
has its individual, independent, and unique methods of calculating and applying development
fees. Some of the difficulties experienced with this particular survey were as follows:
numerical data was not provided by all respondents for all categories in the questionnaire,
several respondents provided statements for calculating a fee based on time and/or
materials without providing the necessary factors such as how much time, or sent their
regulatory documents such as the Uniform Building Codes and fee schedules for Riverside
County staff to interpret. In some instances, varying approaches to completing the survey
failed to provide numerical data for computing the "bottom -line'' relationships. Fees for
specific purposes that could only be applied to a limited number of circumstances or that
applied to a localized area within a jurisdiction were omitted from all computations. For
example, the mitigation fees for the Steven's Kangaroo Rat and the Fringe -toed Lizard
could only be applied to specific areas of Riverside County where these endangered species
reside. The Assembly Bill 3158 processing fees of $25 (payable to the County) and $850
(payable to the State) for Environmental Impact Reports (EIR) and review of
environmental documents required by the State Fish and Game Commission, were added
to each agency's environmental tabulations. Information was not available regarding the $25
processing fee as it applied to the other counties, therefore, it was omitted from Table 2.
It was assumed that the hypothetical case would require an EIR though the questionnaire
stated assume a negative declaration, nearly all respondents omitted this response and
provided EIR information.
METHODOLOGY
In an attempt to approximate a ''real world" example, participating agencies were asked to
respond to the following scenario. Participants were asked to identify fees for a hypothetical
subdivision consisting of fifty (50) single-family detached homes. The request was that the
fee amounts reflect fees currently being charged for the 1991-92 Fiscal Year. Recognizing
the impossibility of designing a hypothetical subdivision model that would account for all
variables for all agencies and probable conditions, the following parameters were developed
based on information obtained from Riverside County data sources.
Unit information
• Single-family detached house with 3 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms
Dwelling unit size of 1,670 square feet with a 400 square feet garage
• Sales price of $165,000
• Lot size of 7,200 square feet
• Subdivision acreage of 10 acres
• Subdivision dimensions of 660 feet by 660 feet for sewer and water
• Land value of $90,000
• Electrical/mechanical criteria: one gas range, dishwasher, 220 volt dryer, 50
electrical outlets, forced air-conditioning and heating, 7 vents, and 2
appliances
Plumbing included 2 tub/shower combinations, and 11 fixtures
Strong motion tax (SMIP) based on valuation
Site Improvements
Grading of 100,000 cubic yards
Sanitary sewer of 2,000 linear feet
Storm drains of 300 linear feet
Street improvements of 4,000 linear feet including one-half perimeter streets
Utilities of 2,000 linear feet
Water system of 2,000 linear feet
An environmental determination was to be made that a negative declaration would be
prepared. An assumption was made that the subdivision would include a general plan
amendment, a zone change, a tentative tract map, and a review of the site plan.
Fee Survey
It was requested that fees be provided by the categories as defined, for both a single unit
and the entire subdivision. Information was requested on the amount of fee support to the
Planning and Building Departments by asking what percentage of each department's
operating budget was fee supported. Fee information was to be provided by the below
listed categories. An infoi illation section labeled "Other" was provided for each category
to collect data that should have been included within the major section divisions, but for
which no special sub -category was provided.
Map Fees
Tentative Tract Map
Site Plan
Design Review
Engineering
• Final Map
• Improvement Plan
Building Fees
• Building Permit
• Mechanical Permit
• Electrical Permit
• Plan Check
• Grading Permit
Impact Fees
• Wildlife
• Public Facility
• Street/Road
• Park/Recreation
• Flood Control/Drainage
• Traffic Mitigation
Environmental
• Environmental Impact Report
• Negative Declaration
Environmental Assessment
Subdivision
• Application
General Plan Amendment
Zone Change
Each jurisdiction may have different meanings in their land development terminology,
therefore, the following definitions were used:
Impact Fees
Wildlife (habitat conservation) - fees collected to protect and preserve
wildlife, habitats, and species.
4
Public Facility - fees for capital improvement projects and structures, such as
libraries, city halls, police stations, etc.
Street/Road - fees to provide for road infrastructure.
Park/Recreation - fees to provide local and/or regional parks, open space
and/or recreation facility.
Flood Control/Drainage - fees to provide flood control infrastructure.
Traffic Mitigation - fee to mitigate impacts of traffic (e.g., signals,
transportation demand management, and master plan system).
Fire - fee to provide for capital facilities and equipment for fire protection.
Subdivision Fees
Application Fee - fee for initiating subdivision process.
General Plan Amendment - fee paid for processing an application to change
the general plan land use designation of the project site.
Zone Change - fee to process an application to change the zoning of a
parcel(s).
Tentative Tract Map - fee for processing tentative (initial tract) map
application.
Site Plan - fee for reviewing the plan on a specific parcel(s).
Design Review - fee for evaluating project composition.
Engineering Fees
Final Map - fee for filing the final map.
Improvement Plan - fee for evaluating improvement plans.
5
COMPARISON
It should be understood that the use of the information generated from this survey is
limited. Developers make development project -siting decisions based on various market
factors of which fee levels are but one. This survey focused only on comparing fees within
Riverside County. An analysis to determine the absorption rate of the development market
was not conducted. Therefore, no attempt was made to determine the impact these
tabulations might have on any given market. Due to the absence of a market absorption
analysis, the data could not be interpreted to make a detelinination as to whether Riverside
Countv's fees are too high or too low relative to the fees of other agencies, or acceptable
or unacceptable within a particular development market.
A definitive statement about the relationship of Riverside County to the median and
extremes in sum totals of the fees cannot be made; since approximately fifty percent of the
cities within the County declined to participate in the current survey. Tables 1 and 2 show
the numerical data provided by the survey participants. Table 2 provides a good -example
of the difficulty with conducting comparison surveys. Data from Imperial and San
Bernardino counties show zero totals for either the category of impact fees or engineering
fees. Impact fees are not currently assessed by Imperial County; however, it is unlikely that
engineering fees are not assessed, yet this information was not submitted. Therefore, the
sum of fees shown for these counties is probably artificially low. These respondents were
included in the survey to illustrate the extremes in responses and the difficulty with ranking
the results.
Charts 1 and 2 illustrate the relationships between the survey respondents. Chart 1
illustrates the aggregated amount of fees by agency. The dark vertical line passing through
the center of the graph functions as a bench mark to illustrate the relationship of County
of Riverside fees to the other agencies shown on the Y (vertical) axis of the graph. Shown
on the X (horizontal) axis is the total dollar value in thousands of dollars. Relative to the
other agencies, Riverside County with total fees of $377,445 occupies a moderate position
slightly above the cities' median of $354,007 and significantly above the counties' median of
$283,167.
Chart 2 illustrates the relative amounts of fees expressed in percent greater than or less than
those of Riverside County. The reasons for these relationships were not explored due to
the limited scope of the survey. This study does not explain why agencies in close proximity
to one another with similar characteristics would have greatly varying fee amounts and
structures. The cities of Indian Wells and Cathedral City are both within the Coachella
Valley and both have similar geography and other physical characteristics. The County of
Riverside also has development projects within the same valley, however, the disparity is
great between the fees of one agency and those another. For the hypothetical case,
Cathedral City has the lowest of the three fees shown at $183,165; the Riverside County was
next highest at $377,445; and the City of Indian Wells was highest at $405,380.
Of the five county respondents, Orange County ranks highest ($847,600) with Riverside
County third ($377,445), in total fees for 50 units. However, comparison of fees among
counties must be viewed with some caution because a few counties presented incomplete
7
data (refer to the statement above about County data). Engineering fees are often based
on a percentage of total construction cost. The hypothetical 50 unit subdivision did
not specify a construction cost which may have resulted in fee variances by survey
respondents estimating varying construction costs.
The comparison of Charts 2, 3, and 4 indicated that the Riverside County development fee
levels were within acceptable limits when all participants were considered. Using Chart 3,
Plannin De artment o Fe u ort, as the basis for comparison, it was discernible that
few agencies attempted to recover total land use planning costs through development fees.
The following discussion highlights the comparisons. Chart 4 was introduced to this
comparison because building fees are often used to support land use planning activities.
However, Riverside County does not use building fees to support land use planning activity.
Riverside County's land use planning activity was 98 percent fee supported. The cities of
Corona and San Jacinto had a higher fee support with 100 percent. Several cities failed to
report this data, therefore, a zero appears in Table 1 where appropriate. However, since
these cities collect fees it is reasonable to assume that those fees are used to support the
services for which they were collected.
Another indication derid from comparing the relationships among Charts 2, 3, and 4 was
that most agencies' fee levels were below total recovery costs. The reasoning for the level
of fees within some agencies may be based on particular policies that may have little or no
relationship to cost recovery. This is illustrated in Table 1 on the lines titled fpsg_Re
pDn. The level of fee support ranged from as low as 5 percent to a high of 100 percent
for planning functions. Building department fee support ranged from a low of 74 percent
to a high of 159 percent. The high of 159 percent indicates that other functions, such a:
planning, maybe, are being subsidized by this revenue source. Table 2 presents the same
information for the participating counties. Those entries shown as zero reflect an absence
of data.
The bottom line in Table 1 < >purity Fees,illustrates by percentage points the
amount of the total fee greater than or less than that of Riverside County. Table 2 presents
the same information for the participating counties.
A determination of the reasons why fees for any particular agency are set at a specific level
was beyond the scope of this study.
"Leeve imlim Oq, n 00:10(a ps RPde,ea
91
%EE-
%12
%t-
9SLt6J
..%6
%9
%69
%6i-
%9-
%99-
ffiL
YLCI-
%X1-
1IS-
IVA
%j$-
%9L-
%ir-06)
VP1
%POI...
Si9iACNI10JIY101<>
116b
1100(4
I1N00
[IU
11006)
.L11OdallS aad 40
.INR pLLIV.4)Q 062101111
PS/DI
%601
%001
%001
%OS
%09
ILO
%O
%0
%AOI
%6 SI
SO
1:00i
01001
%0
%P01
11.11
%00l
9.001
A031041dN6 aid 40'
%L/
Y001
SOP
%02
166E
%R
SO
SO
9A
955
%EL
%0
'L0
%POI
9A
%SS
%19
%09
%99
9606
1NOP9111Vda0 ONINNY"
609 LE PS
SI6'£S25
995291E
Z6494CJ
0629111
5091551
S0066C$
00`295S
510692
0109512 ,
060Z0Z;
050E 50Y5
921'L2E)
SSE'LSZ0 ,
5911912
D609£9$ a
ILL991J
50-5E26
699112t
I191LS5
,SLINII 06 NO Sidi TaC
E00991
0550'692
006161
0516 LS
055'595
05110E6
00195122
000L5
009'5612
091191E
961'561
056'E40
056961
006'691
019202
056161
05E691
0502652
120962
0661501
11.1.yl9,m 09005 C m
Saari DN)011119 109+.
611
OLI
995
L191,
9150
56
101
C922
119
121
PII
LL
0501
09
011 '
n91
0E
06
9
OD0'f
EC
1LZY
02
0Z1
Sl
61
52
691
SI
C96
12
R6 11.®nd 9g0u
ESH
900
604
601
099
91S
Z92
ZSb
C95
625
EC
56*
006
PIP
596
059
151
695
LS1
SOS': 9p0g3 m1
16
S9
CII
50
5E1
01
191
19
0E1
151
621
9L
OS
LCI
151
LB
6E1
012
65 1191»4 19013091
S9
YE
LEI
021
CO
1C
46
LZ
SS
L9
W
99
CS
L6
L6
99
96
80
29 llmsrd 1o10.901
909
506E
601
111
229
YID
ECI
569
999
119
105
Z9L
951
LS9
ILL
L99
169
9L9
510
149 7495++49999n
(,I00001kSaad DNIallf
OP I911
0S9'ES
155112
BCE/
009 CS
52L0
000LIS
009'SES
001'62
O5L1111
05C191
096'62
001112
0211,61
594.92
BITES
009'ES
000195
ZII'SS
LSE911 I °S5004 DN0$aaNIDN"d I0101
2E1'06
0551
15C'01
006'91
000'EE
0091
000'6
000'09
0900
000'91
000'00
SI LIP
0961
001E
0521
215E
05156 ,a1d ,00®e005019
9002
0052
COZY
SCE
0092
SZ1
005
0091
0051
0511
0561
OOP
0011
0211
0691
0521
00S
05L2
0061
LOCI dap/lon1
0119005nd)Sad ONIHOSN1DP
990121
005112
9061.1E
S1501
515911 ._911'55
052'11
5150912
00592E ..S9112
56522
129111
190'ES
014055
00221
005.92
551'91
961551 =53103 N01611005150EI8 10091
P511
9621
0101
_,.000'95
0O22
.912122
s091
01C
066
5SEI
WO
0S
0052
III
005'L
052
veld oDPx
061
ZSf1
OR
0052
0121
061
O(L
mid •0
C6111
0001
1,505
616
661'5
S951
SLC
5219
00021
0622
0611
OOP
OLE1
00E9
005E
6lf'll
005
00L1
0501
59250 65090 00044e,11006.
1292
COSY
9661
9921
0L61
0811
12C
0515
000.5
55E1
0£b
0511
995
0092
0521
129'S
0521
0051
056
9261, e90093009,
1609
0005,
SHE'S
ZL61
5E91
006
E009
000'4.
0901
095
5191
016
00C1
DR
6609
05P
055E
SLZ1
155'L 00'0509000Y 0.1a10a00
161'5
0601
Oq,n9dd
(010095 m6DSH079AI09E
P6C01
6L0192
SL90ZS
6E622
S21122
05122
506'5J
SLYS
55(015
6L0.91
092`I)
5L5'LS
019121
525CS
OOOSt
ZIO'6S
SLO'I1
SZ9'Et
S9EE2
Pd9'62 I6aa11 1V595N1N0901ANa 1910;
R
St
R
R
15
15
R
55
55
R
R
00
SE
00
55
(9
00
0Z
(9SSC aV).
R s0091
E99
005
OO/Y
ftZ
855
a
OOH$
SBC
OW.SCY
OS/
621
C99
002
6R
OC
EEL ,Oamesm00y (990,96000
0052
0 06049
OIL'L
OSfb
99
R 1
OCHE
09l'li
SLS7
Of
OW
OS9 lI
OS9'$
859
0599
R OS{'
0519
0001
YZEb
OS9
05[1
OSZY
991% slwdaa n0dp p,aemm010o
5001
,
(01100 OS pdk')V1HH WL60HIA0
100!6.19g00 Am OS91.
000'5655
OPT b9IS
05690E2
0001622
0(1EC2
041105
051161
0002E11
005122
009'6616
059112
05510E2
000161
00E'16)
010'505
1651'60E6
05526E
009921
015'40IS
0009055
001
0521
052'E
L661
9E1
92
001
92
SIC
.Sdad,1.1'dd Wl?00.
1eg9
009
LLS
102
PS
651
009
091
191
009 0;
051
D6I
051
OS
BYE
551
051
OS1
OM
051 17S0ps09) 9l,0190�;
E69
Ott
D09
WO'S
CZB
DOB
91Z1
055
iv
RS2
5W
000
1101 0900?�I0nm9
SZS
1191
Cl)
009
L1D1
2962
d9L
OSC
960%
19!
906
C001
056'1
SLE1
05C 9DI0v3.11/4"
LOL1
192
St
an
001
661$
9012
Doi
COl'
00E
DL91
109
D96
LOB2
R91
921
6661 67Pad Mpn
(Pm Pi Pm 9.11-y0010n1090)
on 01RP®L
(Sun 1041•Sda4 131d1
(1 ) 4'O4
(54/46)
(1006)
([6l0H
Y
OlNIJ✓C
aO1StiIi)a
EDVIIIW
dS SO IN
1Ha5a0
Aaa1YA
aP{PNIS7d
v'
S1'IR%
Vs.'
1311BH
YN0110J
A313
'iW0H1iLYJ
',Mill -NJ
aHLVI51
1NOMptafi
ONINP(Y6
AdNN03
A1)0031Y:ta+R
n eJP a ,wvl
`i'„ 42;.
.C'2 /Sfi;;N .... `'z3z!v'nL:.`•' fi '1kY E,l. b,rL,..
y�
�. .J*fi>G4$
wy'�,y ryy
CFe,✓DG3"�'?'5.1;'rn. {Cf{+Y
yy�yy
.�K•RL'9'
yp,�
:FFA.f�V•
,
[yyy(y�'
t,AK:.,
yp
:. . r' :`t' !!•Y..:'«P'.L1�Sre.c.R'.Yfti)4. .Y "vxir. ..:. ,r��.i� .-.. U A. `'��'1.g..,uweMM�..
TA HI 2 - COUNTIES LAND DEVELOPMENT FEE SURVEY FISCAL YEAR 1991-92
Per sail lees bared on a laypothctical 50 nail ■bdivinio■
1
RIVERSIDE
IMPERIAL
COUNTY
LOS ANGEL.ES
.....COUNTY...
ORANGE
COUNTY
I SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY
SAN DIEOO
COUNTY
MINIMUM
FEE
MAXIMUM'.
'FEE CATEGORY
COUNTY
IMPACT FEI:S:(per nail)
Wildlife
Public Facility
StrceURord
Pm k/Rocreatio■
Flood Control/Drainage
Traffic Mitigation
Pie
Other
, i
350
1,017
I
400
1,378
5,000
4,428
4,424
163
800
1,260
357
3,058
260
1,949
5,000
350
1,017
ISO
163
3,U58
FEE
260
1,949
5,000
4,428
4,424
150
400
3,058
Total IMPACT FEES
on ■ 50 nail ■ ■bdivision:
I • I I
$0
$68,900
$700,750
$273,750
$0
$700,750
ENVIRONMENTAL:(per 50 waits)
Envitosacntal Impact Report •
Negative Declaration •
Esvronnsenlal Assessment
Other •
•(AH 3158)
9,146
723
2S
....,
2,500
535
5,000
III
.....
7,800
2,300
1 ,000
5,000
2,500
2,30U
535.
25
9,146
2,300
723
t,000
Total ENVIRONMENTAL. FEES
$9,894
$3,035
$5,000$5,000
$1I,100
$5,000
$3,035
$11,]00
SUBDIVISIONS:(per 50 snits)
Applications
General Plan Amendment
Zone Changes
Tentative Tract Maps
Site Plan
Design Review
Other
7,251
4,928
13,26$
3,350
2,000
1,700
1,750
7,54010,500
5,000
5,000
I
3,400
11,775
_.
9,625
973
3,350
2,000
1,700
973
5,000
1,750
3,350
9,625
5,000
13,265
5,000
1,750
Total SUBDIVISIONS FEES
$25,444
$8,800
$7,540
$25,500
$]5,175
$10,598
$7 540
$25,500
ENGINEERING:(per 50 snits)
Final Map
Improv.ents Plants
2,707
43,650
..,.
4,300
9,700
48,700
`. .......
, .,.. .'.
640
3,000
640
3,000
48,700
43,650
Total ENGINEERING FEES
$46 357
$0
$14,000
$48,700
$0
$3,640
$3,640
$92,350
BUILDING FEES(per omit)
Building Permit
Mechanical Permit
EI«trial Permit
Plan Check
Grading Permit
Other
671
82
S9
503
325
149
626
46
70
105
10
101
762
62
98
630
69
248
...
1,247
106
_
1,158
8
26
9
.
1,345
713
109
626
46
59
8
10
9
1.345
82
98
713
325
248
Total BUILDING FEES
on a 50 unit s■bdiviaion:
$89,450
$47,900
$59735
60%
$93,45U
$18889U
0%
$67,650
$847,600
0%
$60,050
$108,350
$47,900
$1011,350
TOTAL. FEES oa 50 snits:
3377,445
$116,325
$401338
$59,735
$847,600
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
% FEE SUPPORT
98%
__
0%
76%
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
` ':FEE SUPPORT
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
MTal rnrr PfTV PV Pc
., C,I ? i Z,'0%4
o ai83
'S4a•L.. �+"++"7<aw� Ti ��4 x'�n4
5tig
AI A
ja ..,:lur.3 vh : MAN"Y,..
:'+
CXINEORAC
SAN I
CAGE
PA-M
___
AA903`
RANLAN6
�COERSm-q
`,
`056RT
0VALLEY
NINE
HAM MU
LA
CITY
INDIO
BANNING
14EAUMON7,
JACINTr�CtN6N3
AjEL31NOtlQ
HEMET
SPRINGS
S,CI47NTTa
MIRAGE
COUNTY
DESERT
90D1AN
WELLS
VALLEY
E
BEE
FEE
Lagati
(88706)
(80A1)
(90/91)
ZFS191r
(MIN)
'ACT PEES:(Pcr unix)
260
2a
1d81e
(cask/Bag R-Ra and Lizard)
bloc Pacfty
1,115
300
128
m0
940
601
260
I.
L670
2103
2,883
3,100
128
310
oat/Road
100
264
1,194
2,227
2767
525
100
276
1JRacrcalec
1,003
350
1.375
525
946
761
749
123
358
1,017
1,896
'- 1.950
038
1,614
3,902
350
398
5,08
rod Cml0v175644oa80,
83
240
550
855
823
.1,017
800
2,525
405
000
5,083
600
1,218
83
34
Woo MRiptim(mcbodi011UM P)
150
300
150
155
1.50
50
150
650
190
140
50
ISO
464
160
577
254
;>409
400
400
207
150
Si
ler
26
400
315
1.250
(997
23
100
430
3,250
36
3,25
.al INIOCT PEEti
50 m8 rubdiv1a3m:
172550
585,150
541,638
5107,710
529.400
1161280
595,300
127.500
5191,000
341,130
5149,000
5201,000
3204300
394,750 I
530(550
5293.400
3369,150
5333,500
3309,950
3432,000
827,500
543200
e a
VIRONMENTAL,(per 50 units)
'-
vcmmmtal Impact Report •
850
4150
050
2,250
1,350
1350
6,750
11,150
25,150
1,575
5,850
2,638
; 9146
5,850
6,850
7,710
8,174
21,100
16,250
850
150
23,15
pxlva Den. •
2500
2,500
250
v}mmta1 Aaansecrnt
200
125
385
70
230
500
758
435
550
1,100
276
T27
38
700
663
863
4,400
30
4,40
aer •
25
25
25
23
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
^.15
25
23
25
23
23
25
25
25
AB 3158)
roral 10V1R0N3.IOO4TAL FEES
11,075
35.000
31,260
32,345
53,625
11,075
57,525
314,375
525,610
62,150
36,975
32,939
$9.894
55.905
57,575
$8,398
39,012
121.125
120,675
3375
3375
125,6i
BD8V 0SIONSpes 50 lacks)
T10001890
1850
5,194
1850
$,11
7,2'
venal Pim Amendment
450
250
500
1275
2550
4,000
3,340
7,000
918
1,633
3,840
1,972
7,251
500
1,875
6094
4091
5,344
1000
250
5,01
ee Cbaepa
1250
1,250
430
950
1500
3.500
2600
5.000
788
1,710
1,355
1268
4,928
325
1150
3,611
1621
1970
4994
4450
325
06050020act Map
500
2500
1,150
1,858
1700
4000
9300
12,000
1.370
1,565
2290
479
13,265
375
800
11,193
11,313
5,194
7,854
8.125
375
13,24
c Pin
758
3,270
1352
2.500
190
140
230
190
3,27
alp Pin
515
250
2500
800
50
7,500
370
4157
990
50
7.51
,2(
ncr
2200
1244
1724
1010
1,0E3
real SUBDIVISION FEES:
52,280
14,000
32=303
14,175
36,566
SI L300
324710
326300
1.1068
13,710
37,485
36,313
38,444
(1558
313825
121.466
33T,218
354519:
310900
19,015
11,250
5265(
,
GINEERINO FEES4pc 50 un%a)
ad Map
500
1450
1350
1,900
2,750
2,500
4120
3,500
1100
725
3750
338
2,707
500
800
2001
3,250
3600
4,200
1800
338
1,250
42(
60,0'
precsoaat Plan
3,100
4715
60,000
3,512
1,250
1,350
40,000
1.600
14,000
9,000
43,650
16.500
4,680
44,132
3960
10,351
33,800
ival ENGINEERING FEES:
53,600
54,365
361350
35,412
54,000
$3,850
544,1m
15,100
317.100
5725
510750
5338
$44357
317,000
35,480
546.140
57,210
33,600
71(551
535.600
1338
161.3'
ILDING FEES Ira unit)
ildin/Peak
691
716
505
855
876
594
637
064
758
04
057
744
471
433
742
604
867
622
709
695
433
21
0
1.
01060506 Pcmit
66
47
87
40
44
34
53
27
44
55
120
'. 12
31
83
65
47
80
133
97
2
:0dcel Pewit
87
137
131
210
139
85
So
14
74
138
45
'. 59
78
124
91
151
135
113
164
452
45
232
6
n Cbad
451
465
378
757
369
508
414
533
908
516
523
484
503
232
415
453
450
468
709
33
6
3,15
04119 Pooie
15
145
728
24
363
25
2.271
19
28
90
325
1000
15
30
4
45
hes
17
123
68
1850
170
611
101
(647
2,213
^149
1.778
119
114
286
45
46'
aI a1BU1LD1N0 FEES
al a 50 sail 0ab65var00e_
53018
549,j,1} $q
$82.650
195,193
594028
569,450
054,5�
_
1135500
501350
1301,850
3131400
57(150
389,450
3280,100
173,950
161003
391450
345350
897,500
174300
365,550
IPAL FEES ON SO VNITS:
q
31611f7
1583 165
1202040
S117.669
Ii19z050
1235 575
1253 955
1257155
1269075-
1321-128
1351605
1356,450.
1 3374742
3317 445
3399,005
1405,380
1437,409
5438 MO
1448.290
1467,504
5567.610
5168775
5562.64
ANNING DEPARTMENT
61%
0%
72%
44%
60%
100%
100%
9%
0%
35%
5%
m%
98%
O%
0%
42%
55%
30%
00%
0%
OF PEE UPPORT
38LD6N0 DEPARTMENT
14%
0%
iS9%
f00%
100%
i60%
100%
0%
100%
SO%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
105%
100%
50%
106%
0%
' FEE SUPPORT
(90,91)
(90fli)
(0021)
(90MI)
(90r91)
O > TOTAL COUNTY FEES
-55%
-51%
-46%
-41%
-38%
-33%
-32%
-29%
-13%
-7%
-6%
-1%
NN
6%
7%
14%
16%
17%
73%
49%
...oe....asmN ....1.. .wa...,. MD II Ine0ea S. rw, 0Y1 Merrneben 09en yet net undated by eh0a 100a current surrey.
NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
County of Riverside
Land Development Fee Survey
Fiscal Year 1990-91
Summary of Total
Land Development Fees
50-Unit Subdivision
CITIES
Moreno Valley
Riverside
Perris
Calimesa
Temecula
Indian Wells
Palm Desert
Rancho Mirage
La Quinta
Palm Springs
Herne
Lake Elsinore
Corona
San Jacinto
Beaumont
Banning
Indio
Cathedral City
Blythe
15
DOLLAR AMOUNT
OF TOTAL FEES
562,610
462,584
440,290
438,040
437,409
405,380
399,005
374,742
356,410
351,605
327,128
269,075
257,155
253,955
235,575
217,669
202,040
183,165
168,775
Table 4A
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO
ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR CERTAIN
SERVICES PERFORMED FOR AND OR BY THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO FIRE
AND LIFE SAFETY DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF SAN
JACINTO ORDINANCE NO. 975
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Jacinto has adopted an Ordinance No.
975, establishing certain fees and adopting the Uniform Building Code, 1991 Edition, with
certain amendments, the Uniform Administrative Code, 1991 Edition, and certain other
Codes known as: The Uniform Housing Code, 1991 Edition as amended by Title 24 of the
California Code of Regulations; the Uniform Building Code Standards including all
appendices, 1991 Edition as amended by Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations; the
Uniform Mechanical Code including all appendices, 1991 Edition as amended by Title 24 of
the California Code of Regulations; the Uniform Plumbing Code including all appendices,
1991 Edition as amended by Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations; the National
Electrical Code, 1990 Edition as amended by Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations; the
Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 1991 Edition; the Uniform
Sign Code, 1991 Edition; the Uniform Solar Energy Code, 1991 Edition; and the Uniform
Swimming Pool, Spa and Hot Tub Code, 1991 Edition, as amended by Title 24 of the
California Code of Regulations, each as published by the International Conference of Building
Officials, International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, International Fire Code
Institute or the National Fire Protection Association, with certain amendments, additions, deletions
thereto; and
WHEREAS, the declared intent of the City Council requires the San Jacinto Fire and
Life Safety Department to associate the costs of a specific service with the limited number of
persons who most benefit from that service; and
WHEREAS, the cost of rendering such services should he borne by the beneficiaries of
such service; and
WHEREAS, the San Jacinto Fire and Life Safety Department has duly proposed and
made available to the City Council and to the public, data indicating the estimated cost of providing
such services; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was been held on January 19th, 1993, concerning the
schedule of fees and charges.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO that it hereby approves the fees and charges for the San
Jacinto Fire and Life Safety Department as set forth in Exhibits A, B and C attached hereto and
made a part hereof, and that said fees and charges shall be in full force and effect upon the effective
date of Ordina ce.No. 975. (1,_
January 19, 1993
Page 1
Building Related Fees and Charges Resolution - RESOLUTION NO.
MOVED, PASSED and ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 1993.
ATTEST:
Mayor
City Clerk
CERTIFICATE
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. duly adopted by the said City
Council of the said City of San Jacinto on the date therein set forth.
City Clerk
January 19, 1993 Page 2
"EXHIBITS" to Building Related Fees and Charges Resolution
EXHIBIT "A"
All Plan Check Fees required by Ordinance No. 975 are non-refundable.
SECTION A. BUILDING PERMIT FEES
Value Fee
$1.00 to $500.00
$501.00 to $2,000.00
$2,001.00 to $25,000.00
$25,001.00 to $50,000.00
$50,001.00 to $100,000.00
$100,001.00 to $500,000.00
$500,001.00 to
$1,000,000.00
$1,000,001.00 and up
Other Inspections and Fees:
1. Inspections outside of normal
business hours
(minimum charge - two hours)
2. Reinspection fees
(minimum charge one hour
3. Inspections for which no fee is
specifically indicated $45.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one hour)
$25.00
$25.00 for the first $500.00 plus $1.33 for each
additional $100.00 or fraction thereof, to and
including $2,000.00
$45.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus $9.00 for each
additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and
including $25,000.00
$252.00 for the first $25,000.00 plus $6.50 for each
additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and
including $50,000.00
$414.50 for the first $50,000.00 plus $4.50 for each
additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and
including $100,000.00
$639.50 for the first $100,000.00 plus $3.50 each
additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof
$2,039.50 for the first $500,000.00
plus $3.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction
thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00
$3,539.50 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $2.00 for
each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof
$67.50 per hour
$45.00 per hour
4. Additional plan review required by
changes, additions or revisions to
approved plans $45.00 per hour
(minimum charge - two hours)
January 19, 1993 Page 3
"EXHIBITS" to Building Related Fees and Charges Resolution
SECTION B. ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES
Permit Issuance
For issuing each permit $15.00
For issuing each supplemental permit $4.50
System Fee Schedule
(Note: The following do not include permit -issuing fee.)
New Buildings
The following fees shall include all wiring and electrical equipment in or on each building,
or other electrical equipment on the same premises constructed at the same time.
For new Multi -family residential buildings (apartments and condominiums) having three or
more living units not including the area of garages, carports and other noncommercial
automobile storage areas constructed at the same time and all nonresidential buildings same
time and all nonresidential buildings except warehouses, per square
foot $0 035
For new single- and two-family residential buildings not including the area of garages,
carports, and other minor accessory buildings constructed at the same time, per square
foot $0.040
Warehouses - per square foot $0.02
For other types of residential occupancies and alterations, additions and modifications to existing
residential buildings, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE.
Private Swimming Pools
For new private, residential, in -ground, swimming pools for singe -family and Multi -family
occupancies including a complete system of necessary branch circuit wiring, bonding, grounding,
underwater lighting, water pumping and other similar electrical equipment directly related to the
operation of a swimming pool, each $30.00
For other types of swimming pools, therapeutic whirlpools, spas and alterations to existing
swimming pools, use the UNIT FEE SCHEDULE.
Carnivals and Circuses
Carnivals, circuses, or other traveling shows or exhibitions utilizing transportable -type rides,
booths, displays and attractions.
For electric generators and electrically driven rides, each $15.00
For mechanically driven rides and walk-through attractions or displays having electric lighting,
each $4 50
January 19, 1993 Page 4
"EXHIBITS" to Building Related Fees and Charges Resolution
For a system of area and booth lighting, each $4.50
For permanently installed, rides, booths, displays and attractions, use the UNIT FEE
SCHEDULE.
Temporary Power Service
For temporary service power pole pedestal including all pole or pedestal -mounted receptacle outlets
and appurtenances, each $15.00 (per pole containing electrical equipment)
For a temporary distribution system and temporary lighting and receptacle outlets for construction
sites, decorative light, Christmas tree sales lots, firework stands, etc., each $7.50
Unit fee schedule -To be used on other than new buildings and as noted above.
(Note: The following do not include permit issuing fee.)
Receptacle, Switch and Lighting Outlets
For receptacle, switch, lighting or other outlets at which current is used or controlled, except
services, feeders and meters.
First 20, each $0.75
Additional outlets, each $0.45
Note: For multi -outlet assemblies, each 5 feet or fraction thereof may be considered as one
outlet.
Lighting Fixtures
For lighting fixtures, sockets or other lamp -holding devices
First 20, each $0.75
Additional fixtures, each $0.45
For pole or platform -mounted lighting fixtures, each $0.75
For theatrical -type lighting fixtures or assemblies, each $0.75
Residential Appliances
For fixed residential appliances or receptacle outlets for same, including wall -mounted electric
ovens; counter -mounted cooking tops; electric ranges, self-contained room, console, or through -
wall air conditioners; space heaters; food waste grinders; dishwashers; washing machines; water
heaters; clothes dryers; or other motor -operated appliances not exceeding one horsepower (HP) in
rating, eacheach $3.00
Note: For other types of air conditioners and other motor -driven appliances having larger electrical
ratings, see Power Apparatus.
Nonresidential Appliances
For residential appliances and self-contained factory -wired, nonresidential appliances not
exceeding one horsepower (HP), kilowatt (KW), or kilovolt -ampere (KVA), rating including
January 19, 1993 Page 5
"EXHIBITS" to Building Related Fees and Charges Resolution
medical and dental devices; food, beverage, and ice cream cabinets; illuminated show cases;
drinking fountains; vending machines; laundry machines; or other similar types of equipment,
each $3.00
Note: For other types of air conditioners and other motor -driven appliances having larger electrical
ratings, see Power Apparatus.
Power Apparatus
For motors, generators, transformers, rectifiers, synchronous converter, capacitors, industrial
heating, air conditioners and heat pumps, cooking or baking equipment and other apparatus, as
follows:
Rating in horsepower (HP), kilowatts (KW), kilovolt -amperes (KVA), or kilovolt -
amperes -reactive (KVAR):
Up to and including 1, each $3.00
Over 1 and not over 10, each $7.50
Over 10 and not over 50, each $15.00
Over 50 and not over 100, each $30.00
Over 100, each $45.00
Notes:
1. For equipment or appliances having more than one motor, transformer, heater, etc.,
the sum of the combined ratings may be used.
2. These fees include all switches, circuit breakers, contactors, thermostats, relays and
other directly related control equipment.
Busways
For trolley and plug -in -type busways, each 100 feet or fraction thereof $4.50
Note: An additional fee will be required for lighting fixtures, motors and other appliances that are
connected to trolley and plug -in -type busways. No fee is required for portable tools.
Signs, Outline Lighting and Marquees
For signs, outline lighting systems or marquees supplied from one branch circuit,
each $15.00
For additional branch circuits within the same sign, outline lighting system or marquee,
each $3.00
Services
For services of 600 volts or less and not over 200 amperes in rating, each $18.50
For services of 600 volts or less and over 200 amperes to 1000 amperes in rating,
each $37.50
For services over 600 volts or over 1000 amperes in rating, each $75.00
January 19, 1993 Page 6
"EXHIBITS" to Building Related Fees and Charges Resolution
Miscellaneous Apparatus, Conduits and Conductors
For electrical apparatus, conduits and conductors for which a permit is required but for which no
fee is herein set forth $11.00
Note: This fee is not applicable when a fee is paid for one or more services, outlets, fixtures,
appliances, power apparatus, busways, signs or other equipment.
Other Inspections and Fees:
1. Inspections outside of normal business hours $67.50 per hour
(minimum charge - two hours)
2. Reinspection fees $45.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one hour)
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated $45.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one hour)
4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved
plans $45.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one hour)
SECTION C. MECHANICAL PERMITS FEES
Permit Issuance
I. For the issuance of each permit $15.00
2. For issuing each supplemental permit $4.50
Unit Fee Schedule
1. For the installation or relocation of each forced -air or gravity -type furnace or burner,
including ducts and vents attached to such appliance, up to and including 1000,000
Btu/h $9.00
2. For the installation or relocation of each forced -air or gravity -type furnace or burner,
including ducts and vents attached to such appliance over 100,000
Btu/h $11.00
3. For the installation or relocation of each floor furnace, including vent $9.00
4. For the installation or relocation of each suspended heater, recessed wall heater or floor -
mounted unit heater $9.00
5. For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not
included in an appliance permit $4.50
6. For the repair of, alteration of, or addition to each heating appliance, refrigeration unit,
cooling unit, absorption unit. or each heating, cooling, absorption, or evaporative cooling
system, including installation of controls regulated by this code $9.00
January 19, 1993 Page 7
"EXHIBITS" to Building Related Fees and Charges Resolution
7. For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor to and including three
horsepower, or each absorption system to and including 100,000 Btu/h $9.00
8. For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over three horsepower to and
including 15 horsepower, or each absorption system over 100,000 Btu/h and including
500,000 Btu/h $16.50
9. For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 15 horsepower to and
including 30 horsepower, or each absorption system over 500,000 Btu/h to and including
1,000,000 Btu/h $22.50
10. For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over 30 horsepower to and
including 50 horsepower, or for each absorption system over 1,000,000 Btu/h to and
including 1,750,000 Btu/h $33.50
11. For the installation or relocation of each boiler or refrigeration compressor over 50
horsepower, or each absorption system over 1,750,000 Btu/h $56.00
12. For each air -handling unit to and including 10,000 cubic feet per minute, including ducts
attached $6.50
Note: This fee shall not apply to an air -handling unit which is a portion of a factory -
assembled appliance, cooling unit, evaporative cooler or absorption unit for which a permit
is required elsewhere in this code.
13. For each air -handling unit over 10,000 cfm $11.00
14. For each evaporative cooler other than portable type $6.50
15. For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct $4.50
16. For each ventilation system which is not a portion of any heating or air-conditioning system
authorized by a permit $6.50
17. For the installation of each hood which is served by mechanical exhaust, including the
ducts for such hood $6.50
18. For the installation or relocation of each domestic -type incinerator $11.00
19. For the installation or relocation of each commercial or industrial -type
incinerator $45.00
20. For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this code but not classed in other
appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this code $6.50
Other Inspections and Fees:
1. Inspections outside
(minimum charge
2. Reinspection fees
(minimum charge
of normal business hours $67.50 per hour
- two hours)
$45.00 per hour
- one hour)
January 19, 1993 Page 8
"EXHIBITS" to Building Related Fees and Charges Resolution
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated $45.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one hour)
4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved
plans $45.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one hour)
SECTION D. PLUMB NG PERMIT FEES
Permit Issuance
1. For the issuance of each permit $15.00
2. For issuing each supplemental permit $4.50
Unit Fee Schedule (in addition to 1 or 2 above)
1. For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixture on one trap (including water, drainage
piping, and backflow protection therefor) $6.00
2. For each building sewer and each trailer park sewer $15.00
3. Rainwater systems - per drain (inside building) $6.00
4. For each cesspool (where permitted) $22.50
5. For each private sewage disposal system $45.00
6. For each water heater and/or vent $7.50
7. For each industrial waste pretreatment interceptor including its trap and vent, excepting
kitchen -type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps $12.00
8. For installation, alteration, or repair of water piping and/or water -treating equipment,
each $3.00
9. For repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping, each fixture $3.00
10. For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter, including backflow protection devices
therefor $9.0 0
11. For atmospheric -type vacuum breakers not included in Item 2:
1 to 5 $7.50
over 5, each $1.50
12. For each backflow protective device other than atmospheric -type vacuum breaker:
2 inches and smaller $7.50
January 19, 1993 Page 9
"EXHIBITS" to Building Related Fees and Charges Resolution
over 2 inches $15.00
13. For each gas piping system of one to four outlets $3.00
14. For each gas piping system of five or more outlets, per outlet $0.75
Other Inspections and Fees:
1. Inspections outside of normal business hours $67.50 per hour
(minimum charge - two hours)
2. Reinspection fees $45.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one hour)
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated $45.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one hour)
4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved
plans $45.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one hour)
SECTION E. ELEVATOR PERMIT FEES
New Installation:
Passenger or freight elevator, escalator, moving walk:
Up to and including $40,000 of valuation $55.00
Over $40,000.00 of valuation $55.00 plus $1.00 for each $1,000
or fraction thereof over $40,000.00
Dumbwaiter or private residence elevator:
Up to and including $10,000 of valuation $15.00
Over $10,000 of valuation - $15.00 plus $1.00 for each $1,000 or fraction thereof
over $10,000
Major Alterations:
Fees for major alterations shall be as set forth in Exhibit "A" above.
Installation fees include charges for the first year's annual inspection fee and charges for electrical
equipment on the conveyance side of the disconnect switch.
SECTION F. ELEVATOR ANNUAL CERTIFICATES OF INSPECTION FEES
For each elevator $25.00
For each escalator or moving walk $15.00
January 19, 1993 Page 10
"EXHIBITS" to Building Related Fees and Charges Resolution
For each commercial dumbwaiter $10.00
(Each escalator or moving walk unit powered by one motor shall he considered as a separate
escalator or moving walk.)
SECTION G. GRADING PLAN REVIEW FEES
Grading plan review 35% of permit fee.
Other fees:
Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved plans
$45.00 per hour (minimum charge - one hour)
SECTION H. GRADING PERMIT FEES
50 cubic yards or less $25.00
51 to 100 cubic yards $37.60
101 to 1,000 cubic yards $37.60 for the first 100 cubic yards plus $17.50 for
each additional 100 cubic yards or fraction thereof.
1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards $195.10 for the first 1,000 cubic yards, plus 17.50
for each additional 1,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof.
10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards $330.65 for the first 10,000 cubic yards, plus
$67.60 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof.
100,001 cubic yards or more $939.35 for the first 100,000 cubic yards, plus
$37.50 for each additional 10,000 cubic yard or fraction thereof.
Other Inspections and Fees:
Inspections outside of normal business hours $67.50 per hour
(minimum charge - two hours)
2. Reinspection fees $45.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one hour)
3. Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated $45.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one hour)
4. Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to approved
plans $45.00 per hour
(minimum charge - one hour)
SECTION I. OTHER PERMIT FEES
Mobilehome lot preparation $54.00
Mobilehome set-up inspection
January 19, 1993 Page 11
"EXHIBITS" to Building Related Fees and Charges Resolution
1 Pier set-up only $180.00
2. Mobile home awnings $30.00
3 Mobile home patio room $95.00
4. Mobile home Porch deck $30.00
5. Mobile home issuance fee $20.00
6. Mobile home State of California MCD fee $30.00
SECTION J. MISCELLANEOUS FEES
Permit transfer $15.00
Storage
0.02% of valuation for all projects plus $5.00 per sheet for all plans required to be retained
indefinitely by state law.
Fire and Life Safety Service Fee
0.10% of valuation for Fire and Life Safety equipment, contractor license verification, and
computer permit tracking program.
Energy Conservation Review Fee
15% of the building permit fee.
Fence Permits
$15.00 per lot (up to 300 lineal feet of length. Otherwise $25.00 per lot.)
Wall Permits
$15.00 minimum, permit based on valuation in accordance with Section A above. Value calculated
at $5.00 per square foot of wall.
Pools and Spas
Fee based on value in accordance with Section A above. Valuation rate is $1.00 per gallon. Plan
check equals 50% of permit fee. Separate electrical, mechanical and plumbing permits are
required.
Landscape and Irrigation Plan/Plan Checking Fee
Before accepting a set of plans and specifications for checking, the Fire and Life Safety Department
shall collect a plan checking fee. PLAN CHECK FEES $15.00 per lot
Landscaping Permit Fees
January 19, 1993 Page 12
"EXHIBITS" to Building Related Fees and Charges Resolution
A fee for each landscaping permit shall be paid to the Fire and Life Safety Department.
LANDSCAPING PERMIT FEES $15.00 per lot
January 19, 1993 Page 13
"EXHIBITS" to Building Related Fees and Charges Resolution
EXHIBIT "B"
FEES REQUIRED BY CITY OF SAN JACINTO ORDINANCE NO. 975,
SECTIONS 4 AND 7.
A. WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FEE:
$250.00 per residential unit or 15 plumbing fixture units for commercial and industrial
development.
B. SEWER CONNECTION FEE: $200.00 per unit.
C. PUBLIC SAFETY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND:
1. Capital Structures. $50.00 per residential Unit or $0.01 per square foot of
lot area lot being developed for industrial or commercial uses.
2. Capital Equipment. $10.00 per residential unit or $0.01 per square foot of
lot being developed for commercial and industrial purposes.
D. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS.
Area 1: $5,990.00 per acre.
Area 2: $4,975.00 per acre.
E. SIGNALIZATION FEE:
For the purpose of mitigating the impacts of new growth on City intersections. The funds so
collected shall be set aside to install, upgrade and/or maintain traffic signals throughout the City.
1. Single family attached or detached $150.00/unit
2. Multiple Family $100.00/unit
3. All other $2,700.00/acre
F. LIGHTING, LANDSCAPE, MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (light districts
only):
$1.00 per lineal feet of public street frontage in existence prior to development.
January 19, 1993 Page 14
"EXHIBITS" to Building Related Fees and Charges Resolution
"EXHIBIT C"
PUBLIC WORKS FEES AND
WHEN IMPROVEMENTS ARE NEEDED
Inspection Fees Permit Fee
1. Residential Driveway $15.00
2. Commercial Driveway $15.00
3 Excavation Permit $15.00
within unpaved section
of City right-of-way
4. Excavation permit $15.00
within paved section
of City right-of-way
5. Encroachment on or over
a City right-of-way
without excavation
6. Curbs and Gutters
7. Sidewalks
Utility Service Connections
involving open
cuts across streets
9. Utility Service Connections
with no open cut
10. Pot hole Permit
11. Paving
12. Miscellaneous
13. Core Drill of Curb
$15.00
$15.00
$15.00
$15.00
$15.00
$15.00
$15.00
$15.00
$15.00
Inspection Fee
$25.00
$25.00
$25/250 ft.
$25/150 ft.
$25.00/encroachment
2 1/2% of estimate
$25.00 minimum
2 1/2% of estimate
$25.00 minimum
$40.00 each crossing
$25.00 each crossing
25.00 each
2 1/2% of estimate
25.00 minimum
2 1/2% of estimate
25.00 minimum
$25.00 per lot
January 19, 1993 Page 15
"EXHIBITS" to Building Related Fees and Charges Resolution
Other Fees
1. Subdivisions
Plan Check 2 1/2% of preliminary engineers estimate
Inspection 2% of final engineers estimate plus additional
fees for signs, painting, street trees, etc.
2. Street Trees $250.00 each
3. Signs $175.00 each
4. Curb paint $3.00/ft. minimum 75.00
5. Fire Hydrant & Blue Dot $50.00 per hydrant/200.00 minimum
Note: For non -subdivision improvements, 1% of the 2 1/2% fee shall be submitted as a plan check
fee with the submission of plans.
January 19, 1993 Page 16
STAFF REPORT
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Les Evans, Director of Public Works
DATE: January 19, 1993
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF PARKWAY MASTER PLAN
Recommendation:
Approve and adopt the Parkway Master Plan prepared by Kammeyer and Associates
dated October 6, 1992 with revisions on October 29, 1992 and December 2, 1992.
Background and Analysis:
On November 5, 1991, the City entered into contract with Kammeyer and Associates for
the preparation of Parkway Master Plans. The City has a policy of requiring landscaped
parkways and street medians along its arterial streets. As development occurs, each
developer submits a plan for landscaping which may or may not be consistent with
adjacent landscaping or any other criteria. Therefore, a Parkway Master Plan has been
prepared to:
1. Provide a guideline for developers.
2. Ensure that there is a plan that will create the settings which
the community desires.
3. Ensure that plantings will produce streetscapes that are both
lush and colorful.
4. Ensure that State guidelines for waterwise landscaping are met
In preparation of the Master Plan, the City Council participated in two workshop
sessions. The first session in February, 1992 included a slide presentation of various
alternatives and invited the Council to complete a questionnaire (attached). The
consultant incorporated the City Council's feedback into a draft Master Plan and
presented it to the City Council in a second workshop session in October, 1992. As a
result of the October workshop and feedback from the Planning staff, a final Master Plan
is ready for adoption.
Page Two
January 19, 1993
Each member of the previous City Council received a Master Plan in a loose-leaf
notebook. The attached revisions to the October 6, 1992 Plan should be placed in the
notebook. If the new Councilmembers have not received a copy of the Master Plan
notebook, as part of their orientation materials, please contact Les for a copy.
attachment
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
STAFF REPORT
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
Brian McNabb, Director of Community Development
via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
January 19, 1993
Budget Allocations and Fee Waivers for Social Service Agencies and Non -
Profit Organizations
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution thereby
establishing Council policy for budget allocations and/or fee waivers for social service
agencies and non-profit organizations.
BACKGROUND
This item is continued from January 5, 1993, at the direction of the City Council. The
Council considered four resolutions relating to fee waivers. The Staff recommended no
fee waiver under any circumstance. Also provided were three alternatives proposing
varying amounts of budget allocations. The Council determined that the Staff
recommendation was too restrictive, and directed Staff to provide the mechanism to allow
some form of fee waiver.
Staff is proposing that fee waivers be restricted to specific types of tax-exempt
organizations, those with a 501(c)(3) and 501(k) tax-exempt status. These organizations
include religious, educational, charitable, amateur sports, prevention of cruelty to children
and/or animals, and child care providers. Staff is proposing detailed criteria for
determining the amount of any fee waiver for these eligible agencies. The proposed
criteria was established in part by and still utilized by the Hemet/San Jacinto United Way
for determining the amount of United Way assistance. The proposed criteria is as follows:
1. Agency must be an incorporated, non-profit 501(c)(3) or 501(k) tax exempt
organization.
2. The agency must provide documentation of the extent of its assistance to City
residents or businesses.
3. The agency must demonstrate an active volunteer leadership that represents the
diverse elements of the population.
4. The agency must demonstrate sound financial and program management.
5. The agency must provide documentation as to the need for assistance.
City Council Staff Report
January 19, 1993
Page No. 2
Staff will prepare the appropriate forms for eligible agencies to complete to determine how
much, if any, assistance should be provided. Additionally, the fee waiver should take the
form of donation of Staff time, that is Staff time for review of applications and plan
checking for entitlement requests. Costs for supplies such as office supplies, road
closure barricades and postage should not be waived and should be reimbursed to the
City.
Any other requested assistance should come from funds set aside in the annual budget
for such purposes. Also, Staff is recommending that fee waivers not be granted for
construction projects, as generally a detailed construction budget would have been
prepared and should have included payment of City fees.
Attachment: Resolution
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN JACINTO, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS AND FEE WAIVERS MAY BE
GRANTED TO SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCIES AND NON-
PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto recognizes the difficulty of social service agencies and
non-profit organizations to raise funds for operations and maintenance;
WHEREAS, the City of San Jacinto feels assistance for social service agencies and non-profit
organizations is warranted;
WHEREAS, the waiver of City fees for social service agencies and non-profit organizations
is the appropriate process for the City to provide assistance to such agencies and
organizations;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows Staff to
determine the amount of fees to be waived for social service agencies and non-profit
organizations based upon the following criteria:
1. Agency must be an incorporated, non-profit 501(c)(3) or 501(k) tax exempt
organization.
2. The agency must complete the appropriate forms for consideration and submit
the following information:
A. Documentation of the extent of its assistance to City residents or
businesses.
B. Roster of Directors which demonstrates an active volunteer leadership that
represents the diverse elements of the population.
C. Documentation to demonstrate sound financial and program management.
D. Documentation as to the need for assistance.
E. The previous three years financial statements.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the fees to be waived shall only consist of the value of
the Staff time related to the request, including any requests for construction entitlement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that fee waivers not be granted for construction projects,
as generally a detailed construction budget would have been prepared and should have
included payment of City fees.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any other assistance shall be appropriated from funds
set aside in the annual budget for such purposes.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, the Staff recommendation shall be forwarded to the City
Council for ratification.
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto at a regular meeting
thereof held on the 19th day of January, 1993, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Deputy City Clerk
Mayor
CERTIFICATE
The foregoing is certified to be a true copy of Resolution No. duly adopted by
the said City Council of the City of San Jacinto on the date set forth therein.
Deputy City Clerk
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
STAFF REPORT
Honorable Mayor and members of the City Council
Dave Anderson, Assistant to the City Manager
Via Pamela S. Easter, City Manager
January 19, 1993
19th Year CDBG Calendar and CDBG 'Theme"
Recommendation:
Review 19th Year CDBG Calendar, and receive information related to selection of a
CDBG "theme" at the CDBG Public Hearing on February 2, 1993.
Background:
19th Year CDBG 'Theme"
The Community Block Grant (CDBG) program is a Federal program designed to fund
projects that will assist low and moderate income persons in each city. Funds are
allocated based upon the city's population. These funds are tightly regulated, and have
a very specific set of eligibility criteria.
The City anticipates receiving approximately $98,000 in 19th Year CDBG funds. Eighty-
five percent (85%) of the funds,($84,300) are required to be spent on general public
facilities and programs, with fifteen percent (15%) ($14,700) allowed for public service
projects. The City usually receives much more in requests for the public service portion
of the funds than can be accommodated. The City Council, last year, expressed a desire
for a consistent procedure for making these decisions. The procedure that emerged, was
to select a single "theme" or emphasis from all eligible CDBG categories. This gave
potential applicants an indication of the City's direction, and the likelihood of receiving
CDBG funds. It also provided the City Council with specific criteria with which to evaluate
funding requests.
Eligible CDBG funding categories for public service funds are as follows:
* Child care
* Health care
* Job training
* Recreation programs
* Education programs
* Public safety services
* Fair housing activities
* Services for senior citizens
* Services for homeless persons
* Drug abuse counseling and treatment
* Energy conservation counseling and testing
Last year, the City Council selected the theme "Basic Needs", declaring eligible for
funding those requests that provided housing, food or clothing to needy persons. As
such, it combined several CDBG eligibility categories.
On February 2, 1993, the City Council will hold a public hearing to accept public input
concerning how the City's 19th Year CDBG funds should be allocated. At the conclusion
of the public hearing, City staff will request that the City Council choose a emphasis or
theme. This will provide the City and Community Council Subcommittee with criteria upon
which it can base its funding recommendations. No action is required at tonights meeting.
19th Year CDBG Calendar
A 19th Year CDBG Calendar is attached for your review. Upon inspection, it is evident
that it is a long and involved process. It should be pointed out that subrecipients may not
receive funds from the City as a result of this process until April of 1994!
Jan 19, 1993
Jan 22, 1993
Feb 2, 1993
Feb 16, 1993
Feb 17, 1993
Feb 19, 1993
Feb 19, 1993
Feb 24, 1993
Mar 2, 1993
Mar 13, 1993
May 1993
Jun 1993
Jun 1993
Jun 1993
Jun
Jul
Aug
Nov
Dec
1993
1993
1993
1993
1993
Jan 1994
Feb 1994
Feb 1994
Apr 1994
Apr 1994
Apr 1994
May
Jul
Jan
1994
1994
1995
19TH
A
CDBG PROG CALENDAR
Publish CDBG Calendar
Publish Public Hearing Notice for 2/2/93 City Council
Meeting
CDBG Public Hearing - Application distribution begins,
Selection of Public Service Project "Theme"
Applications due back to the City
Eligibility screening - staff
City and Community Council Subcommittee review of
project applications
Publish Public Hearing Notice for 3/2/93 City Council
Meeting
Staff report due with recommendations
Second Public Hearing - Selection of 19th year CDBG
Projects
City CDBG Application packet due to County
County CDBG Hearing
County CDBG approval of 19th year projected use of funds
(Final Statement)
County submits "Final Statement' to US Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
City receives notification by County Economic Development
Agency (EDA) of preliminary approvals, and a request to
complete environmental assessments
City submits Environmental notices to County for posting
Environmental Review period
Environmental review process completed
County -City contract submitted to City Council for approval
County -City contract signed by County Board of
Supervisors
City sends out subrecipient agreements for approval
Subrecipient agreements submitted to City Council for
consideration
City submits signed subrecipient agreements to County
Riverside County sends the City an "Authorization to incur
cost letter for 19th Year CDBG Projects"
City notifies subrecipients that they may incur project
related costs retroactively to July 1, 1993
Subrecipients submit reimbursement requests to City. City
issues check
City submits reimbursement request to County
County issues check to City
City and subrecipients respond to County Subrecipient
Monitoring Questionnaire.