Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 12/16/2004Specialist REDEVELOPMENT OPERATIONS MANAGER STEVEN PASAF..OW AMENDED AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF 7 HE SAN JAGINTO' CITY COUNCI �ECEMBER'16, 2004, 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District Board Room: 2045.`South San Jacinto Avenue, San. Jacinto, California ORGANIZATION 1 1 Callao .Order: Roll Call 1..3 lnuocation Pledge of Allegiance;. 1,5 Special Presentations Business Spotlight of the Month / Economic Development Certificate. of Achievement -.Zephrum Q. Ellison, Troop 210, attaining Eagle Scout status PUBLIC COMMENTS: Now is the:time for the public to address the Council on any subject within the jurisdiction of the .. CitCouncit not listed on the agenda:. A:limitation of three (3) minutes sh yall be set for each person desiring to address the City Council. 2;1 Riverside, County Fair /Sponsorship opportunities / Terri Neuenswander PUBLIC'HEARING: 3.1 Public Hearing — Continued from 12/2/04 - At the conclusion of the. Public Hearing and the certification of the election results foradding T31097 into CFD No: 2003-I for Police and Fire Services. aka: Annexation Resolution ,No._ / A resolution. certifying; the results of an election and: adding property Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 / Annexation No.11 — T311097 aka Continental:Residential Inc /Approve and Adopt /: City -Attorney.& Special Tax Consultant . •. , ,City�CounciFAge,ida.: December16'. `2004;_ Paye:2,af 5 �rdinarnce No ': / An Ordinance ame,nding'the Western Riverside ounty Transportation Uniform; Mitigation Fee /;Approve first reading and ntrod:uction;of Ordinance No. andby further motionread;by title An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto. Amending the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee_(TUMF; Schedule of Ordinance No 03-03 ommunity Development Director Af the conclusion of the Public Hearing, declaring the results of the assessment; baliot'tabulation, confirmassessment andordering road; stre:et and highway maintenance for. certain property (commonly known as Continental :Residential`Inc D R Horton T31:097) into Assessment DistrictNo 2003-1 / Resolution N0 _ I,A resolution declaring the results:' of the assessment'balllot:tabulation for the annexation of certain property to Assessment District No 2003-1 (AD`2003 1).pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 order. maintenance work therein and, confirming the diagram arid assessment -Annexation No. 9: / Approve and`Adopt/Special Tax Consultant and City>Attorney' andscaping, Lighting, and Park District No:°2 ( Jo:.27 (A.0 Ramona LLC T31037/ 1/-2/-3) / Ci esolution No. / A Resolution initiatingproceedings for the nnexation of property into LLPD No 2 — Annexation No. 27 / Approve nd Adopt A Resolution approving the Engineer's Repo in to LLPD No 2/ Approve and Adopt / A Resolution declaring intention to annex ;pr Annexation No. 27 / Approve and Adopt Public Hearing /At the conclusion of the public hearing if the City determines that a majority protest does not exist; by motion approve the certification of the election results for adding certain property into LLPL) No 2 known as Annexation No. 27 / Approve and Adopt. Resolution No. / A Resolution ordering annexation of territory into LLPD: No. 2 and levying assessment- Annexation .No 27- T31037/ n.urgencyordinance of the City:Council: of the ;City -•of San ,. acirito,.California'adjust!rig sewer rates to Complywithan •City Council 'Agenda Decemtier:16, 2004 Page-3 of 5 interagency sewage agreement with, Eastern Municipal Water DistriCt,/ S Finance Director; CITY DEPARTMENTS 4.1 Local Appointments List (agency, committee and subcommittee appointments) aka Maddy List / CGity.Clerk 4.2 Mobile Home Rent Control / Discuss and provide direction / City Manager 4 3 Bus Shelter Advertisement / Provide direction / City Manager Council Goal Process / Provide final 'additions for Goals' List / City Manager Federal Priority and Legislative Agenda / Provide final additions for Legislative .Agenda; 2005 / City Manager Request for Proposals for the Development of a Park Master Plan / Review and'direct staff / City Manager and Community Development Director CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under. Consent Calendar:: areconsidered routine and will be enacted by one motion by City Council Members in the:form.listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the Motion unless members of the City,Council, staff or the public"reeuests a : specified item be removed and/or discussed. " Anyone wishing Ito..diaeuss "a consent calendar item should come forward:upon:invitation of the` Mayor;. state their name and address; 'and 'the consent' calendar item number. Speakers should limit comments to three' (3)'minutes. 5.1 Warrants: at 12/16/04 /Approve / Finance Director 5.2: November 18, 2004 Regular. Minutes / Approve / City Clerk 5.3 December 2, 2004 Regular Minutes / Approve / City Clerk 5.4 Contract with Riverside County Information Technology Services / Approve and Authorize City Manager to execute said contract / Finance Director Fihai Trracf.MapsTS1©37 1 and T3103i Approve and Authorize City Manager:to execute the subdivision Agreement-/CityErig'rneer `Ca cil:A6,genda December 12004:„: Page '4'of 5, :lexander:.Communities Authorization to.proceed - potentially significant,historica.l site at the Francisco Estudillo Heritage Park and, appropriation for the use;:of an additional $30;000 of Park Developmen Funds / Approve:lRedevelopmentOperations Manager Additional ;staff for Utility Billing Department FY 2004 05 / Approve an'c Appropriate $20,00 0 from Utility Enterprise Funds ($14,000 Water, $4,000`..Solid Waste, $2,000 Sewer) / FinanceDirector .: Organizational Training / Authorize Persongenics training for Manager / City Manager Special Events / Approve and Appropriate $5000 for Special Events City Manager AYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER'RE„PORTS / DISCUSS,IONS 1.' .Valley Re -Start Paid for Ride Program =- Homeless Committee'/ City Manager. and, Council Member Shah,/ / Appropriation request.of $2000 donation to. Valley:;Re-Start for administration to_pay fora P Ride rogram San,Jacinto 2 Mayor and Council: Memb"er:Committee and.Subcommittee Agendas Receive:and File`/ City:Clerk `.. CLOSED SESSION ;ONFERENCE:WI,TH LABORNEGOTIATORS? gency designated representativesRogerfordPeter Cosentini Rogr; Cra&P m;ployee;:Organization: Service Employees International Union ?NFERENCE WITH LABORNEGOTIATORS; ency designated representatives Roger Crawford' iployee Organization: Management Association City Council Agenda December.16, 2004 Page 5 of 5 W.fi�-fi SEAL i'RFRTJ` Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property APNs 435-020-031, 032, 033 and a portion of 029 Agency negotiator: Peter A. Cosentini, City#Manager Negotiating parties: Frey Living Trust / Tierra West Commercial Realty Under negotiation: Price and Terms ADJOURNMENT If you challenge any action of the City Council in court,. you may limited:to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, .or in writtencorrespondence delivered to the City Council (c/o the City Clerk) at, or prorto, the public hearing. CHALLENGE TO LAND USE DECISIONS: Any person seeking to challenge a decision regarding land. use made by the City Council as a result:of aproceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and the discretion in the determinationof facts is vested in the City Council, shall be required to commence that action: 90 days following the date on which the decision of the City Council becomes final as provided in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. Please refer to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 to:determine how calculate when a decision becomes final. It is the intention of:the City of San Jacinto:to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects: if, es an attendee or a participant at this meeting; or in: meetings on a regular :basis,; you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in. every reasonable manner :Meese' contact City Nall at (909) 487-7330; at least 48 hours prior to the :meeting to inform us of yourparticular needs and to determine if accommodation la feasible: I, Dorothy L.. Chouinard, City Clerf,of the City of San Jacinto, do here foregoing agenda this 13th day of December, 2004 as required6y cent that I caused to be posted the. TO: AGENDA ITEM December 16, 2004 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Steven G, Pasarow, Redevelopment Operations Manager , SUBJECT: ' Authorization to Proceed with Phase II Archaeological Study of Potential Significant Site at the Francisco Estudillo Heritage Park RECOMMENDATION. By motion approve a Phase II Archaeological Study of the Potentially. Significant Historical Site at the Francisco Estudillo Heritage Park and Appropriate an additional $30,000 of Park Development Funds to pay for the Study. BACKGROUND: On November 4, 2004, the City Council approved the reprogramming of CDBG funds from the Museum building fund and allocated Park Development funds to as replacement due to the lengthy documentation requirements for use of CDBG funds. At the same time, the City Council gave final approval of a replacement location for the library from the current Main Street site to the Francisco Estudillo Heritage Park. Subsequently, Staff submitted the proposal to relocate the museum to the Estudillo Heritage Park to the National Parks Service (NPS) to solicit their concurrence. On October 13, 2004, a written response from the NPS was received that indicated support for the museum being located on the grounds of the Francisco Estudillo Heritage Park. The NPS did condition that an archeologist monitor the grading and excavation: On November 18, 2004, excavation was started at the museum site after a brief ground breaking ceremony. The excavation of the museum site was monitored by licensed Archaeologist from Discovery Works, Inc. of Long Beach, CA, Page 1 of 3 The monitoring included: • all -day reconnaissance of the cutting and close examination of grading and back dirt pile. • recording of the monitoring and observation and O sequential photographing of the grading activities. Approximately 2/3 of the building site was excavated by early afternoon when the Archaeologist noticed several broken bricks, pieces of rusted pipe, pieces of ceramic tableware and pieces of broken bottle glass within the excavation area. It was determined that this might be a significant find such as a buried trash pit or cistern. At that point, the excavation was halted by the Archaeologist and the location was marked by contractor tape and wood stakes. The Archaeologist prepared a written report which indicated that further excavation was necessary by a qualified crew using hand tools to determine the extent of the find and to locate any additional significant pieces of historical content. At staff's request, the Archaeologist prepared a proposal for the Phase II of the excavation. That proposal indicates that the cost of a five day hand excavation by a qualified crew supervised by the Archaeologist would cost between $25,250 and $30,300. At the completion of the hand excavation, assuming no additional significant findings were made, the excavation of the final 1/3 of the museum, site would then be allowed to be completed without further interruption. In discussions with the Archaeologist, the ultimate cost may be less than the proposal cost if it is determined that this is not a significant find and there are no additional potential significant sites located within the excavation area. Staff has considered other options such as (a) moving the museum site further to the northeast to leave this significant site undisturbed and (b) refilling the excavated portion of the site and installing the museum on piers and pads es an above ground building. Either option will require that staff coordinate with and provide additional information and documentation to the National Park Service and the State Office of Historic Preservation (SHPO) to approve the new location and installation method. There is no guarantee that the National Park Service or SHPO will approve another location or how long they may take in doing so. Staff recommends that the City Council appropriate and additional $30,000 from the Parks Development Fund in addition to the $50,000 already allocated for this project to complete the Phase II Excavation of the site. Such an additional appropriation will allow for the completion of the museum building in the approved location in the shortest available timeframe. Page 2of3 JUSTIFICATION: The relocation of the museum has been necessitated due to extensive water damage to the former museum building on Main Street, which rendered the structure uninhabitable. The Francisco Estudillo Heritage Park is the appropriate location for the museum building as it provides for mutual cultural heritage interpretive opportunities. Additionally, the approved Francisco Estudillo Heritage Park master plan provided for a community building in the vicinity of the proposed interim museum building location. The use of the additional Park Development funds will only be used for the excavation of the significant site indicated by the Archaeologist and will allow the project to move forward with the least loss of time. Monitoring and documenting of any items or objects found will meet the requirements of both the National Park Service and the State Office of Historical Preservation to identify any significant historical objects for future generations. All items found will be properly recorded, cataloged and turned over to the San Jacinto Museum for public display. In addition, the Archaeologist will provide a detailed report indicating that the City has met all requirements of both the federal and state programs. BUDGETARY IMPACT: The Museum Association has acquired the modular building to be installed on the Park property from its own funds. The City Council has appropriated $50,000 of Park Development funds for the project to pay for the on -site utilities and interior improvements to the modular building. An additional appropriation of $30,000 would bring the total amount of Park Development funds for this project to $80,000. These additional funds would be used to pay for the costs associated with a Phase II Study and historic excavation and review of the site. The use of Park Development funds will not impact to the General Fund. ATTACHMENT: Proposed Modular Museum Site Plan Archaeologist's Excavation Monitoring Report Archaeologist's Proposal for Phase II Study Page 3 of 3 Discovery Works, Inc 235 East Broadway, Suite 980 Long Beach, CA 90802 (562) 432-1801 www.discoveryworks.com November 22, 2004 Steven G. Pasarow Redevelopment Operations Manager City of San Jacinto Community Development 248 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA92583 Dear Mr. Pasarow: Subject: Archaeological monitoring of the museum building site located at 150 Dillon Street, San Jacinto Discovery Works, Inc. is pleased to submit the following report concerning the one -day archaeological monitoring for the museum building excavation site at the Estudillo Mansion Property at 150 S. Dillon Street in the City of San Jacinto. The excavation site measured ap- proximately 58 feet by 70 feet by 3 feet, and is located southeast of the mansion building. The Estudillo Mansion Property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places. The ap- plication for listing reports that the mansion was built in 1885, after fire destroyed the family's adobe home a few hundred yards to the south. By 1890, a carriage house was added behind and to the southeast of the mansion. The basic integrity of the mansion building and the sur- rounding property were maintained through several additions during the twentieth century. Because the project area has a high potential for significant cultural resources, monitoring by a qualified archaeologist was required for the museum building excavations. Archaeological Scope of Work Beth Padon directed the archaeological monitoring program on November 18, 2004. She has over twenty-five years experience in cultural resource management in southern California and she meets all of the qualifications for Principal Investigator and manager as detailed in "Archeological and Historic Preservation; Secretary of Interior's Standards and Guidelines" (Federal Register, Vol. 48, No. 190, 1983). Ms. Padon is President of Discovery Works, Inc., which has provided cultural resource management services to public and private clients since 1997. Our monitoring program involved the following: • all day on -foot reconnaissance of the cutting and close examination of grading and back dirt pile (conducted by walking in transects as the cutting was done); • recording of monitoring observation; and • sequential photographing of the grading activities. The purpose of monitoring is to: (1) identify prehistoric material or historic materials po- tentially requiring salvage, (2) evaluate prehistoric or historic artifacts as they are exposed during grading and trenching activities, (3) reroute equipment if archaeological resources are Discovery Works, Inc. page 2 encountered, and (4) recover artifacts that may be revealed by the excavations, if' they are few in number and if they are not part of an important prehistoric or historic deposit or feature. Results The grading for the museum building started at 7:30 am with a brief ground breaking ceremo- ny attended by City of' San Jacinto staff and council members, San Jacinto Museum members, and the construction company. Gary Green of Taylor Welding conducted the excavation with a front end loader. He excavated the 50 by 70 foot area from the east side to the west by first piling sediment towards the east and then scooping up the piled sediment from below. The front end bucket could scoop about three cubic yards of dirt at one time. At 11:00 am, I noticed two brick fragments in the stockpile and returned to the cut area to look for the source and for any other potential historic remains. I noticed no additional items, but the next cut of the front end loader exposed several loose bricks and a part of a metal pipe. I stopped the cutting in order to determine the extent of the remains and 1 noticed three more bricks in the sandy sediments with the others. It appeared that these bricks had been pushed from above. In order to inspect for a buried feature, I asked the operator of the front end loader to carefully skim off about 6 inches of sediment from above. This exposed three more bricks and exposed two pieces of glass (one beverage bottle fragment), six pieces of ceramic, and another metal fragment. I stopped the grading because it appears that we were exposing a buried feature such as an intact historic trash deposit and perhaps a cistern. Further exposure of the possible feature by the front end loader was not attempted given the fragile nature of the sandy sediments. Careful inspection of the exposed surface indicated that the bricks and historic debris covered an area of 24 by 21 feet. After returning to our of- fice with the glass bottle fragment, I found that it's manufacture dates to 1882-1886 (Tou- louse 1971). The raised letters on the bottom ("W F & S, MIL") identified it as made by the Wisconsin Glass Company of Milwaukee, which manufactured glass beer bottles of this type from 1882-1886. At 11:30 am, I reviewed the possible feature with City personnel and with the contractor. At 1:30 pm, the operator resumed grading on the south side of the feature where he had piled sediment already dislodged by earlier cutting and where roots from a previously removed China berry tree had caused subsurface disturbance. This additional grading continued until I found two more brick fragments in the loose sediment. Then all grading stopped for the proposed museum foundation. I staked and flagged the area of the possible feature prior to leaving the property. At 2:45 pm, I monitored the hand -excavated, one -foot -wide, 20-inch, 70 foot waterline trench that was dug south from the existing restroom building towards the museum foundation. I also monitored the two -foot wide, six to two feet, 180-foot, backhoe excavation for the sewerline that extends south from an existing line towards the museum foundation. No historic or pre- historic remains were noted in the sidewalls or in the back dirt for these excavations. Recommendations Because of the known historical significance of the Estudillo Mansion property and the potential association of these historic remains with the Estudillo family, we recommend that a qualified archaeological team conduct a test investigation by hand of the historic remains before the mechanical excavation of the museum building is completed. The purpose of the test investigation is to evaluate the historical deposit and determine its significance. Discovery Works, Inc. page 3 This report is submitted to the City of San Jacinto, Community Development, and to the State Historical Preservation Office archaeological records archives at the Eastern Information Center, located at the University of California, Riverside. If you have any questions concerning our monitoring report, please do not hesitate to call me at (562) 432-1801 or (949) 733-1915. Sincerely, Beth Padon President, Discovery Works, Inc. References Toulouse, Julian Harrison 1971 Bottle Makers and their Markss. Thomas Nelson Inc. New York. Discovery Works, Inc 235 East Broadway, Suite 980 Long Beach, CA 90802 (562) 432-1801 www.discoveryworks.com November 23, 2004 Steven G. Pasarow Redevelopment Operations Manager City of San Jacinto Community Development 248 E. Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 Dear Mr. Pasarow: Subject: Phase II archaeological study for San Jacinto Museum Site Discovery Works, Inc. is pleased to submit the following scope and budget for a Phase II archaeological study for the San Jacinto Museum Site at the Estudillo Mansion, 150 Dillon Street in the City of San Jacinto. On November 18, we conducted the field portion of the Phase I study by monitoring the excavations for the museum building foundation site. During Phase I, excavations were halted when we found historic remains that suggest a buried feature such as an intact historic trash deposit or a cistern (Padon 2004). The proposed Phase II study will assess the potential significance of these buried resources, as required by Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Phase II will consist of field excavations, laboratory analysis, and the final report. We base our Phase II scope and budget upon the Estudillo Mansion Property application for listing in National Register of Historic Places (Hewitt 2001). We do not anticipate conduct- ing additional pedestrian survey or field documentation efforts for the project area. We will use site plan maps provided by City of San Jacinto. The following scope of work and budget describe the efforts we propose in order to investigate, document, and evaluate the historical resources associated with the remains encountered during grading of the museum foundation excavation. Scope and Methods As part of determining the project's effect on these resources, this Phase II archaeological study will include: • subsurface investigations of the suspected feature, which will involve a series of shovel test pits, careful probing around the found historical resources, and hand -excavated units; • field and laboratory analysis of the collected materials; and • a written report which describes the methods, analysis and results of the archaeological investigations, and which contains a detailed site map, a discussion of site significance, and recommendations. We will place the hand -excavated units in the area where the historical resources were found and where the shovel test pits and probes indicate other historical features may exist within the museum foundation site. All hand -excavated units and shovel test pits will be mapped from a primary datum and will follow standard archaeological excavation and recording pro- cedures. We will excavate in arbitrary, 10 centimeter levels unless a clear stratigraphic profile appears. If natural stratigraphic layers are observable, they will be followed. Units will be excavated until sterile soil is reached. All sediment will be screened through one -eighth inch hardware mesh screen unless it is obvious that the sediment is imported fill. The artifactual and ecofactual materials will be separated and tagged by the unit number and level. Any cul- tural features or distinctive aspects of the remains (such as a cistern or trash deposit) will be mapped and recorded, and excavated separately. The crew also will take Munsell Soil Color Chart readings and record the sediment composition. At least one wall of each completed unit will be photographed and profiled. Photographs will be taken and logged throughout the work program to show progress and field discoveries. Native American Coordination In addition to the archaeological concerns, there is widespread concern among Native Ameri- can groups for cultural resources located within the San Jacinto Valley. Prehistoric human remains have been found in the vicinity, and there are ethnographic records from the historic period which describe Native American settlements for the Valley (Hoover et al. 1990). If human remains are found during our excavation, the Native American Graves Protection Act Guidelines and State law [Health and Safety Code Sec.7050.5 and Public Resources Code Sec.15064.5 (f)] require that construction personnel: • Halt the work in the immediate area; • Leave the remains in place; and • Contact the project personnel, and the Riverside County Coroner. Until a representative of the Coroner's office reviews the remains in the field, they must not be removed. If the Coroner determines that the remains are prehistoric, the Coroner will contact the Native American Heritage Commission and the most likely descendent from the Native American community is informed. The final deposition of remains is coordinated by representatives of the property owner and the most likely descendent. Project personnel Discovery Works, Inc. project personnel will include Beth Padon, Principal Archaeologist, and up to four other archaeologists. Ms. Padon is the President of Discovery Works, Inc., and will serve as Principal Investigator. Ms. Padon meets all of the qualifications for Principal Investigator as detailed in "Archeo- logical and Historic Preservation; Secretary of Interior's Standards and Guidelines" (Federal Register, Vol. 48, No. 190, 1983). She has a M.S. in Anthropology and over twenty-five years of cultural resources management experience. Ms. Padon is a principal of Discovery Works, Inc. where she administers and directs archaeological projects, historical studies, and the co- ordination with Native American groups. Her archaeological excavation experience includes prehistoric and historic sites in Los Angeles, Kern, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura counties. In addition to the professional archaeologists, we will offer the opportunity for up to ten volunteers to work on the site during the one -week field excavation task to help with field lab work. Each volunteer will attend a brief safety and orientation session on their first mom- ing of work. If there is space and if they wish, volunteers can return for successive days of work. The volunteers will assist the archaeologists in preliminary cleaning, sorting, labeling, and identification of recovered artifacts. Because context is very important in archaeological deposits, and because the structure of the deposits at the museum building site may be fragile, IX/P rin not nlan that ynhmtpPrc will rnnranrt any Pxravatinnc Meetings and Coordination We anticipate that project coordination with the City will be conducted primarily by tele- phone, mail, e-mail, or fax. However, some meeting time will be required to review progress of the project and our findings. We estimate that meetings will take a total of 2 hours. If more than 2 hours is required for meetings, additional time will be charged at S95 per hour, which will be added to this cost estimate. Safety We will take reasonable safety precautions, such as putting up caution tape around the work area and using plywood to cover open excavation units at the end of day. However, we under- stand that the City of San Jacinto will be responsible for securing the work area from casual visitors during the day and from disturbances overnight. Budget Estimate We estimate that the field testing, laboratory analysis, and report preparation will require ap- proximately two months to conduct, beginning on December 6, 2004. We will prepare a draft report and one revision for the final report. Our estimates include staff time for field excava- tions, lab analysis, report production, and client contact. We estimate that the total costs will not exceed S25,250 to conduct the Phase II investigations. This estimate includes working with the San Jacinto Museum Association and other volun- teers to help with the washing, sorting, and cataloging of artifacts at the site. If volunteers are not available for these tasks, then costs would increase by 20 percent to cover the additional personnel time for the laboratory work. Actual costs are determined by time and materials utilized, and according to our hourly rates. The following table shows costs by activity: Activity Cost Field investigations 13,550 Analysis 5,050 Report 6,650 total with volunteers $25,250 total without volunteers $30,300 This Phase II cost estimate includes expendable items, such as phone, photography, lodging and per diem for crew, and consumable field supplies, which we estimate will not exceed S3,525. At the completion of Phase II, we will provide a scope of work and budget for a complete archaeological data recovery (Phase III) investigations, if needed. We recommend this two- step approach because estimates for Phase III will vary widely depending upon the depth and quality of the subsurface historic deposit, and its integrity. Our testing budget and scope assumes that no human remains or major archaeological deposit in addition to the already identified historic remains are found. If another major archaeologi- cal feature is found or if human remains are uncovered, then we will immediately notify the City of San Jacinto and the on -site contractor. The treatment of a major archaeological deposit or human remains is outside of this proposed testing program and would require an augment to this scope and budget. Planned Schedule Archaeological investigations will begin during the week of December 6, and they will finish by February 4, 2004. The following chart shows the planned schedule by task and week: week(s) of Dec 6 Dec 13, Dec 20 Dec 27, Jan 3 Jan 10 through Jar 31 Field excavations Preliminary Analysis (Holiday) Lab analysis and report preparation Discovery Works, Inc. looks forward to working with the City of San Jacinto on the Phase II archaeological study for the San Jacinto Museum Site. We will submit monthly invoices, and payment is due on receipt. This cost estimate for our services is valid for 60 days from the date of this proposal. These services may be terminated upon ten days written notice for good reason by either party. In this event, payment for all services and expenses incurred prior to the date of termination shall be due and payable upon receipt of an invoice. This project will be charged according to the services actually provided, and not by a fixed fee. Discovery Works is a full -service cultural resource consulting company. We carry professional liability, workers compensation, and general liability insurances. Also, we have been certified by the California Small Business Administration as a small business. If you have any questions concerning our proposal, please do not hesitate to contact me at my office at (562) 432-1801 or by e-mail at bpadon@discoveryworks.com. Sincerely, Beth Padon President, Discovery Works, Inc. References Hewitt, Edwin Lee 2001 National Register of Historic Places nomination for the Estudillo Mansion Property. On file with the City of San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency. 248 E. Main Street, San Jacinto. Hoover, Mildred Brooke, Hero Eugene Rensch, Ethel Grace Rensch, and William N. Abeloe 1990 Historic Spots in California. Revised by Douglas E. Kyle, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. Padon, Beth 2004 Archaeological monitoring of the museum building site located at 150 Dillon Street, San Jacinto (letter report). On file at the South Central Coastal Information Center, Anthropology Department, CSU Fullerton. AGENDA REGULAR MEETING of the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the CITY OF SAN JACINTO DECEMBER.16, 2004 Immediately Following the Regular City Council Meeting San Jacinto Unified School District Board R oom 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, California ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order 1.2 Roll Call PUBLIC COMMENTS: None PUBLIC HEARING Now is the time for the public to address the Agency on any subject not listed on. the agenda.- Any person may address the Agency on any subject pertaining to Redevelopment Agency business not listed on the Agenda during this portion of the Meeting: A limitation of three (3) minutes shall be set for each person desiring to address the Agency Directors, None CITY DEPARTMENTS CONSENT CALENDAR The matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion by Agency Members in the form listed. There will be no separate discussion on these items prior to the motion unless members of the Redevelopment agency, staff or the public requests a specified item be removed and/or discussed: Anyone wishing to discuss a consent calendar item should come forward upon invitation of the Agency Chairman," staff their :name: and address; and the' consent calendar' item number Speakers should limit comments to three(3) minutes, Redevelopment Agency Agenda December 16,.2004 Page 2:bf2 MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS None: ;OSED SESSION l Rlr��11 NitT Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: APNs435-020-031, 032, 033 and a portion of 029 Agency negotiator: Peter A. Cosentini, City Manager Negotiating parties: Frey Living Trust / Tierra West Commercial Real Under negotiation: Price and Terms ADJOURNMENT` It is the intention of; the City of San Jacinto to comply: with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you 'will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please' contact City Hall at (909) 487-7330, at/east 48: hours prior to: the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodationis feasible. ; 1, Dorothy L. C6ouinard, Secretary of theSan Jacinto RedeveCopmentAgency, do here to 6e posted. the foregoing agenda the 10i. day of Vecem6er.2004,: as required 6y Caw. evelopment Agency Faye Year Irriplementa ugli 2008/2009 and Housing ,Compfiance'R CKGROU ve-Year :Implementation lan was -adopted for :F pan Jacinto and Soboba o .the requirements of to progress of each Fi ?rogress .Report for eaci This Third Five Year Implementation Plan; serves:: as: a blueprint for current :and future Agency: activities to ;eliminate blight and :the Agency's implementation of its;Iow and' . moderate income housing responsibilities ;The Inaiplementation;Strategy is divided into; two separate components,..e Redevelopment Component and;a Housing Component. The Redevelopment_ Component 1) reviews the goals and objectives ."of .each Redevelopment Project Plan; 2) identifies the Agency's strategy to achieve these goals and objectives`, :3) presents the projects, :programs and °expenditures, (other than those relating to Iow and moderate income housing) that have been.de eloped as a"means to: attain the goals and .objectives, and 4) describes how the;goals, and objectives,: projects, prograriis, ..arid expenditures`: will eliminate. --blight within. the Project Area, ;and 5) the: accomplishments of therevious Plan ditionally, > Pursuant to ;Section3490:;ot to explain how the components: of the plan will imr low :and moderate income housing. Generaily, included in the Redevelopment Component o implement: the housing requirements, of;the:Law requirements > are contained : in the;: Housin shows: how the Agency's -;goals an `preservationand production<will be the setaside and expenditure of tz :,Law, an implementation ement various requirements regardint tt e goals, activities and expenditure. the .Implementation Strategy do no The activities that do implement thesE irriponent The Housing Componen objectives. for low: and moderate :income;`housini �plemented and how the statutory requirements fa x increment revenues_ for housing purposes will b fhe lrriplementation Strategygeneral statement. ofi ection'' unalterable course' `of action" If was -prepared' to set priorities for activities within the, redevelopment project, areas ;for the five-year perlo 3lan and incorporates then,; currently known financial' constraints i rogram of activities. to accomplish .essential near terrri ,revitalization ei yew issues 'and opportunities ' are cor monly encountered'; Bunn administering `;the redevelopment plans during the five-year period mplementation Strategy may. be amended=,if necessary to effectuate ctiviti� he .Five Year Implementation Plan -Housing Component (2004/05 through 2008I0 rid Ten Year ,Affordable Housing Compliance ,Plan .(2004I05 through 20.13/14) ar i#ended to address the demand for very Iow, low and moderate income housing an etter:utilize`koth plysical and financial resources available Community Redevelopment Law The Housing Strategy presents a summary of the Agency's affordable housing programs. It also presents a reconciliation of the Agency's replacement housing obligations and provides a forecast of the number of housing units that are or will be needed to be reserved and affordable to very low, low and moderated income persons or over the next ten years (fiscal years 2004/05 through 2013/14) and until the termination of the Redevelopment Plans. Housing Element The Housing Element of the City of San Jacinto General Plan is currently being prepared. The Draft Housing Element was used as basis for information for the Housing Compliance Plan. It is anticipated that when the City approves its final Housing Element that a review of the Housing Compliance Plan will take place to ensure consistency. The Housing Element will identify suitable sites for the development of housing units, quantify the number of units to be created by income level, and estimate the amount of funds available for housing programs to meet the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) figures. Additionally, the Housing Element will identify additional policies and programs to meet the housing needs of San Jacinto. Inclusionary Housing The Agency is obligated under 33490 to ensure that 15% of non -Agency developed units (and 30% of all Agency developed units) are affordable to very low, low, and moderate income households, featuring covenants that extend to at least the duration of the Redevelopment Plan. To satisfy the Agency's production needs, units that are either development or substantially rehabilitated must be covered by restrictive covenants. Housing units created or assisted after 2001 must carry 45-year covenants for single- family units and 55-year affordability covenants on multi -family units. The Agency's inclusionary need has been credited with 147.5 restricted units. However, 233 additional inclusionary units must be developed. This number may change with the availability of new information obtained under the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance review. An Inclusionary Housing Ordinance is currently being developed for presentation to the City Council in mid 2005. The information from the City's General Plan and Housing Element, (when completed) will be used to finalize the inclusionary requirement. Additional review of past housing projects covenants is underway to determine if older projects have greater than 10-year affordability covenants. Projects that met the previous requirement of 30 years can be used in meeting the inclusionary requirement. Aggregation of Housing Units Among The Project Areas Consistent with the Law, the Housing Compliance Plan provides for the Agency to adopt a policy allowing it to meet it's affordable housing production obligation in the aggregate Page 3ofi amongst all of the Project Areas, pursuant to the Agency's finding that based, on the nature of the ethnic and economic make-up of the City and the Project Areas, the aggregation will not cause or exacerbate racial, ethnic, or economic segregation. FY 1999 through 2004 Implementation Plan Accomplishments The following outlines the accomplishments for the Second Five -Year Implementation plan for 1999 through 2004: San Jacinto RDA Projects • Virginia Lee Acquisition • Main Street Improvement Design • La Entrada Landscape Median • Business Development Loan o Precision Concepts • Commercial Facade Loan/Grants o Maggie's o DeCastro (Secrets) o _Miller Jones Mortuary o National Scent • Estudillo Mansion Porch and Balcony Restoration and Improvements • Ramona/Taquitz Curb and Gutter • Tony's Sea Landing Sale • 915 Industrial Way Property Sale • Coordination and Award of an EDA Grant to install sewer and waterlines and related improvements in the vicinity of Sanderson and the Ramona Expressway. • Development of New Economic Development Marketing Materials for the City. • Progress on the City's General Plan Several projects that were originally planned were not completed due to funding limitations. Soboba Springs RDA Projects • Lake Park Bridge • Lake Park Bridge Sound Wall • Lake Park Street Improvements Housing Programs and Projects • Mortgage Assistance (1 loan) • Habitat For Humanity (2 Homes) • Valley Foundation for the Developmentally Disabled Grant • Camino Los Banos (portion) • Park Manor Acquisition and Demolition Page 4 of 5 ■ Sallee Park Pool ■ Housing Rehabilitation Program Development ■ Preparation of the City's Housing Element The Agency focused its efforts the past year on the development of the Housing Rehabilitation Program which provides grants up to $30,000 for single-family owner occupied homes for rehabilitation. The program utilizes the 45-year affordability covenants, which will assist the Agency in meeting its inclusionary housing requirements. JUSTIFICATION: California Community Redevelopment Law requires the completion of a Five -Year Implementation Plan and Housing Compliance Plan. The approval of the Resolution adopting the Five -Year Implementation Plan and Housing Compliance Plan will meet this requirement. BUDGETARY IMPACT: There is no budgetary impact as a result of the Implementation Plan and Housing Compliance Plan. They provide a guide or blueprint for future projects, but do not result in the allocation of funds or the authorization for programs or projects. ALTERNATIVES: Approve the Resolution adopting the Five -Year Implementation Plan and Housing Compliance Plan. Staff recommends this alternative, which complies with State Law. Not approve the Resolution adopting the Five -Year Implementation Plan and Housing Compliance Plan. Not approving the Resolution will result in the Agency being out of compliance with State Law. ATTACHMENTS: Five -Year Implementation Plan and Housing Compliance Plan 5 RESOLUTION RDA NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO ADOPTING A FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE AGENCY'S SAN JACINTO AND SOBOBA SPRINGS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS; AND ADOPTING THE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS THAT THE AGENCY MAY MEET ITS AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS IN THE AGGREGATE AMONGST ALL OF THE AGENCY'S PROJECT AREAS. WHEREAS, Section 33490(a)(1)(A) of the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code 33000 et.seq. ("Law") requires all redevelopment agencies to adopt an Implementation Plan every five years, following a duly noticed public hearing; and WHEREAS, Section 33490(a)(1)(A) requires that the Implementation Plan contain the specific goals and objectives of the agency for the project areas, the specific programs, including potential projects, and estimated expenditures proposed to be made during the next five years, and an explanation of how the goals and objectives, programs, and expenditures will eliminate blight within the project areas and implement the requirements of Sections 33334.2, 33334.4, 33334.6, and 33413 of Law; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 33490 of the Law, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto ("Agency") has prepared a Five -Year Implementation Plan, including a Ten Year Affordable Housing Compliance Plan, for the San Jacinto and Soboba Springs Redevelopment Projects, contained herewith as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, California Health and Safety Code Section 33413(b)(2)(A)(i) requires that at least 15 percent of all new and substantially rehabilitated dwelling units developed within a project area shall be available at affordable housing cost to, and occupied by, persons and families of low or moderate income; and WHEREAS, Section 33413(b)(2)(A)(v) authorizes the Agency to aggregate new or substantially rehabilitated dwelling units in one or more project areas if the Agency finds, based on substantial evidence, after a public hearing, that the aggregation will not cause or exacerbate racial, ethnic or economic segregation; and WHEREAS, the Agency held, on December 16, 2004, a noticed public hearing at which it determined that aggregation of the San Jacinto and Soboba Springs Redevelopment Projects would not cause or exacerbate racial, ethnic or economic segregation; and WHEREAS, Section 33334.2 of the Law requires that not less than twenty percent of all taxes so allocated be used by the Agency for the purpose of increasing, 1 of 3 improving, and preserving the community's supply of low- and moderate -income housing at affordable housing cost; and WHEREAS, Agency staff has determined review of the Implementation Plan is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code Section 2100 et seq.) ("CEQA") pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the review of the Implementation Plan will have a physical effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, the Agency has conducted a duly noticed public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JACINTO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Agency hereby adopts the Five -Year Implementation Plan and Housing Compliance Plan for the San Jacinto and Soboba Springs Redevelopment Projects, attached herewith as Exhibit A. SECTION 2. In accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 33413(b)(2)(A)(v), the aggregation of the San Jacinto and Soboba Springs Redevelopment Projects will not cause or exacerbate racial, ethnic or economic segregation. SECTION 3. The approval and adoption of the Implementaion Plan does not constitute approval of an specific program, project, or expenditure, and does not change the need to obtain any required approval of a specific program, project, or expenditure form the Agency or the City. [Signatures & Certification on the Following Page] 2 of 3 I, Dorothy Chouinard, Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the Governing Board of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto at a meeting thereof held on the 16th day of December 2004, and that the foregoing is a full and correct copy of said resolution. Agency Secretary PASSED AND ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 2004, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Dorothy Chouinard, Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: BEST BEST AND KRIEGER LLP Agency Counsel Chairperson 3 of 3 The Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto 12/08/04 Thi (FY Five-Y - r Imple 5 through 2 • San Jacinto Redevelopment Plan • Soboba Springs Redevelopment Plan Adopted , 2004 on Plan Prepared For. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92583 Prepared By: 0 INTELLIGENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RSG ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP INC. 309 WEST 4TH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701-4502 PHONE: (714) 541-4585 FAX: (714) 541-1175 E-MAIL: INFO@WEBRSG.COM City of San Jacinto REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD Chris Carlson Buydos, Chairperson Dale Stubblefield, Vice Chairperson Jim Ayres, Member Robert Ritchie, Member Ken Shaw, Member REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF Peter Cosentini, Executive Director Tim Hults, Community Development Director Steven Pasarow, Redevelopment Operations Manager Dorothy Chouinard, Agency Secretary Third Five -Year Imp! - -= 'Plan (FY thr . h II: San Jacinto Redevelopment Projects Table of Contents Introduction 1 Contents of the Implementation Strategy 2 Background 2 Plan Limitations 5 Blighting Conditions 6 Goals and Objectives for all Project Areas 7 San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area 9 Prior Plan Period Accomplishments and Remaining Blighting Conditions 10 Anticipated Planning Period Projects and Programs 13 Soboba Springs Redevelopment Project Area 14 Prior Plan Period Accomplishments and Remaining Blighted Conditions 14 Administration of the Implementation Plan 16 Implementation Plan Adoption Process 16 Mid -Term Implementation Plan Review Process 16 Appendices Appendix A — Housing Compliance Plan G:\REGISANJACINTOl2005 IMPLEMENTATION PLANWEW REPORTSSAN JA INTO 2IX4-20 9 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.DOC Third Five -Year Imps on Plan (FY • • A • through San Jacinto Redevelopment Projects Introduction ii ! . This document is the Third Five -Year Implementation Strategy ("Implementation Strategy") for the San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency ("Agency"). It covers the period from July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2009. The Implementation Plan covers the following redevelopment projects: ■ San Jacinto Redevelopment Project o Adopted on June 28, 1983 o Amendment No. 1 — December 28, 1993 o Amendment No. 2 — December 20, 1994 o Amendment No. 3 — February 1996 ■ Soboba Springs Redevelopment Project o Adopted November 1983 This Plan presents the Agency's goals, objectives, anticipated projects, programs, and estimated expenditures for the five-year planning period fiscal years (FY 2004-05 through 2008-09). This Plan was adopted by the Agency following a duly noticed public hearing held on December 16, 2004. The above mentioned redevelopment projects are to be collectively referred to as the "the Project Areas". The Implementation Strategy serves as a blueprint for current and future Agency activities to eliminate blight and the Agency's implementation of its low and moderate income housing responsibilities. The Implementation Strategy is divided into two separate components; a Redevelopment Component and a Housing Component. The Redevelopment Component: 1) reviews the goals and objectives of each Redevelopment Project Plan; 2) identifies the Agency's strategy to achieve these goals and objectives; 3) presents the projects, programs, and expenditures (other than those relating to low and moderate income housing) that have been developed as a means to attain the goals and objectives; and 4) describes how the goals and objectives, projects, programs, and expenditures will eliminate blight within the Project Area. Additionally, pursuant to Section 33490 of the CRL, an implementation plan must explain how the components of the plan will implement various requirements regarding low and moderate income housing. Generally, the goals, activities, and expenditures included in the Redevelopment Component of the Implementation Strategy do not implement the housing requirements of the CRL. The activities that do implement these requirements are contained in the Housing Component. The Housing Component shows how the Agency's goals and objectives for low and moderate income housing preservation and production will be implemented and how the statutory requirements for the set -aside and expenditure of tax increment revenues for housing purposes will be met. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PAGE 1 The Implementation Strategy is a general statement of "direction" rather than an "unalterable course of action". It was prepared to set priorities for redevelopment activities within the redevelopment project areas for the five-year period covered by the plan and incorporates then currently known financial constraints in developing a program of activities to accomplish essential near -term revitalization efforts. However, new issues and opportunities are commonly encountered during the course of administering the redevelopment plans during the five-year period. Therefore, the Implementation Strategy may be amended if necessary to effectuate its purposes. CONTENTS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Section 33490 of the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et sgg. ("Laval'), requires this Plan to include the following: • Specific Agency goals and objectives for the Project Areas; • Specific programs, potential projects, and estimated expenditures proposed by the Agency over the five-year planning period; and • An explanation of how Agency goals, objectives, programs, and expenditures will eliminate blight within the Project Areas and improve and increase the supply of housing affordable to very low, low, and moderate income households. The CRL also requires that this Implementation Strategy address the Agency's affordable housing production and replacement housing needs and achievements. These items are specifically addressed in the Housing Component and Ten -Year Affordable Housing Compliance Plan, attached hereto as Appendix "A". The City Council of the City of San Jacinto took action in June, 1983 to establish the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto. With this action the City embarked on a comprehensive effort to eliminate blighting and adverse conditions within the City. The focus of the City's revitalization efforts have been channeled through the adoption and implementation of its Redevelopment Plans. The Agency's first redevelopment project area, the San Jacinto Project Area, was adopted in 1983. Since then, the Agency has adopted one additional Redevelopment Project Area, the Soboba Springs Redevelopment Project Area. Over the past twenty years, the Agency has accomplished numerous redevelopment, development, and infrastructure projects that have revitalized properties within the Project Areas. Unfortunately, many of the blighting conditions that required the adoption of the Project Areas still exist or have been exacerbated over time. The effect of the recent recession has impacted redevelopment efforts and the activities of both private and public sector. However, the recent escalation in home values has served to offset the lack of redevelopment activities. Additionally, the Agency, by invoking the tools, mechanisms, and powers provided by the CRL, continues to pursue the revitalization of the Project Areas. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PAGE 2 On December 6, 1994, the Agency adopted its first Five -Year Implementation Plan (FY 1994-1999). The second Five -Year Implementation Plan was adopted in December 1999 (FY 1999-2004). Both Five -Year Implementation Plans cover the two (2) adopted redevelopment project areas that encompass an estimated 3,858 acres of the City's incorporated territory. Additionally, pursuant to the requirements of the CRL, the Agency has held a mid-term public hearing on the progress of Five Year Implementation Plan and has subsequently published a Progress Report for each plan. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PAGE3 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. JS 0 OS Wes IMENIEMPoweanapme City of tian Jacinto 201 E. Mein tit. But Jacinto, CA 22583 Tel. (909) 851-7337 14'. 7•.SNt TIT/ Irtonrolon eforn pri tit mpr verr conpiisti from Po Prprolt•County 019 writhe Cfly or flon amide GIG. The Int We pti bpi* Irenrnelbmp rur dial5g/ 1540.93 551/ errOPPIPInti Prided vgan hiPpendort rerPrairn lo apurary. Wart*/ Carp PP My of 8ao Jechlowll rd berl nnconeltle tOr RN Palm toms or drwee rapidly IM11115 I Ort519 rtg). CITY OF SAN JACINTO Redevelopment Area Map • ir %/City Limits A/ Coritallnas Mejor Streets Saboba Redevelopment Area Sin Jacinto Redevelcpm•nt Ares Fle CV511iderVedevelopment&I I apr Pnriert 03ItEN:4 A map of the Project Areas is presented on Figure 1 below: PLAN UMITATIONS Each Redevelopment Project Area is subject to its own time and financial limits as required by the Law. These limitations are summarized below. Table 1 summarizes the time and financial limits in the Redevelopment Plan. Eminent Incur New Plan Domain Debt Duration Collect Tax Increment San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area Amendment No. 1 Amendment No. 2 (AB 1290 Conformance) Amendment No. 3 Expired 6/28/2003 6/28/2023 6/28/2033 Expired Modified by Amendment No. 3 N/A 2/1 /2006 12/28/2013 12/28/2033 12/28/2043 Soboba Springs Redevelopment Project Area Expired 11/1/2028 ** * Section 700.80 Financing Limitations in the Soboba Springs Redevelopment Plan establishes a limitation of $5 Million of taxes which may be divided and allocated to the Agency. **Section 700.80 Financing Limitations in the Soboba Springs Redevelopment Plan establishes a limitation of $5 Million on the amount of bonded indebtedness, which can be outstanding at one time without an amendment to the Plan. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PAGE 5 BUGHTING CONDMONS This section of the Implementation Plan has been included to identify the legal blight definition at the time each plan was adopted. As defined by Sections 33031 and 33032 of the California Health and Safety Code, in 1983, the year both Redevelopment Plans were adopted, a blighted area was characterized by one or more of the following conditions: 1. Structural Blight The existence of buildings and structures used, or intended to be used, for living, commercial, industrial, or other purposes, or any combination of such uses which are unfit or unsafe to occupy for such purposes and are conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency, and crime because of any one or a combination of the following factors: a. Defective design and character of physical construction; b. Faulty interior arrangement and exterior spacing; c. High density of population and overcrowding; d. Inadequate provision for ventilation, light, sanitation, open spaces, and recreational facilities; and/or e. Age, obsolescence, deterioration, dilapidation, mixed character, or shifting of uses. 2. Economic Blight Properties that suffer economic dislocation, deterioration, or disuse because of one or more of the following factors: a. An economic dislocation, deterioration or disuse resulting from faulty planning; b. The subdividing and sale of lots of irregular form and shape and inadequate size for proper usefulness and development; c. The laying out of lots in disregard of the contours and other topography or physical characteristics of the ground and surrounding conditions; d. The existence of inadequate public improvements, public facilities, open spaces, and utilities which cannot be remedied by private or govemmental action without redevelopment; e. A prevalence of depreciated values, impaired investments, and social and economic maladjustment; and/or; f. The existence of lots or other areas that are subject to being submerged by water provided that any ecologically valuable existing features in such areas shall, to be maximum extent feasible, be preserved. Such conditions, one or more, must cause the following: 1. A reduction of, or lack of, proper utilization of the area; 2. To such an extent that it constitutes a serious physical, social, or economic burden on the community; and/or 3. Which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PAGE6 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR ALL PROJECT AREAS The primary reason for the establishment of Redevelopment Project Areas is the need to eliminate blight within Project Area boundaries including problems relative to circulation, inadequate community infrastructure, and to assist the private sector in providing the type of development that will maximize the development of property within the Project Area boundaries and prevent the recurrence of the blight conditions. The following represent the goals and objectives of the Redevelopment Agency, as stated in each of the Plans, to alleviate blight conditions in each of the project areas: 1. The elimination of existing blighted conditions, be they properties or structures, and the prevention of recurring blight in and about the Project Area. 2. The development of property within a coordinated land use pattern of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, and public facilities, in the Project Area consistent with the goals, policies, objectives, standard, guidelines, and requirements, as set forth in the City's adopted General Plan and Zoning. 3. The development of public services and facilities including, but not limited to, recreational, maintenance, and operational services and facilities as are necessary and required for the development of the Project Area. 4. The elimination of environmental deficiencies including inadequate street improvements, inadequate utility systems, and inadequate public services; and mitigation of freeway or highway impacts, including its circulation movement and its potential social, physical, and environmental characteristics of blight. 5. The development of a more efficient and effective circulation corridor system, free from hazardous vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle interfaces, designed to their ultimate circulation flow. 6. The implementation of techniques to mitigate blight characteristics resulting from exposure to freeway, highway, and/or public right-of-way corridor activity which affect adjacent properties within the Project Area. 7. Beautification activities to eliminate all forms of blight including, but not limited to, visual blight in order to encourage community identity. 8. The encouragement, promotion, and assistance in the development and expansion of local commerce and needed commercial and industrial facilities, increasing local employment prosperity, and improving the economic climate within the Project Area, particularly in the Central Business District, and within industrial and commercial areas and the various other isolated vacant and/or underdeveloped properties with the Project Area. 9. The acquisition, assemblage, and/or disposition of sites of usable and marketable sizes and shapes for commercial, industrial, recreational, and public facility development within the Project Area. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PAGE 7 10. The creation of a more cohesive and unified San Jacinto community by strengthening the physical, social, and economic ties between residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, and public land uses within and about the Project Area. 11. The acquisition and disposition of property for the purpose of providing relocation housing, as may be required to implement the objectives of this Plan. 12. To provide for very low-, low-, and moderate -income housing availability, as required by State law and requirements, as necessary and desirable, consistent with the goals and objectives of the community. 13. To encourage the coordination, cooperation, and assistance of other local agencies, as may be deemed necessary, to ensure that projects undertaken by this Agency are implemented to their fullest and practical extent. 14. The achievement of a physical environment reflecting the high level of concern of architectural and urban design principals deemed important by the San Jacinto community. 15. To encourage community involvement and citizen participation in the adoption of policies, programs, and projects so as to ensure that the Redevelopment Plan is implemented in accordance with the goals and objectives of the San Jacinto General Plan. 16. To provide a procedural and financial mechanism by which the Agency can assist, complement, and coordinate public and private development, redevelopment, revitalization, and enhancement of the San Jacinto community. Additional Objectives applicable to the implementation of the Redevelopment Plans for the Project Areas include: • Eliminate and prevent the reoccurrence and spread of blight and deterioration within the Project Areas. • Continue programs which promote the rehabilitation of the existing housing stock where appropriate. • Provide, improve, or preserve low and moderate income housing as is required to satisfy the needs and requirements of the various age and income groups of the community, maximizing the opportunity for individual choice, and meeting the requirements of State law. • Enhance and upgrade the physical, social and economic conditions within the area thereby improving the quality of life for San Jacinto residents. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PAGES The Redevelopment Plan for the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area ("Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto ("City Council") on June 28, 1983, by Ordinance No.754. The Redevelopment Plan has been subsequently amended on three occasions. Amendment No. 1 was approved and adopted by the City Council on December 28, 1993 to add territory to the Project Area. Amendment No. 2 brought the Redevelopment Plan into conformance with the requirements of AB 1290, codified in Section 33333.6 of the California Redevelopment Law ("Law"), with the approval and adoption of Ordinance No. 1006 on December 23, 1994. Amendment No. 3 was adopted in February 1996, pursuant to a 1995 agreement by and among the City of San Jacinto, the Resources Agency of California, the Califomia Farm Bureau Federation, the Riverside County Farm Bureau, Virgal T. Wooffolk, and Harry E. Bryan Jr. The amendment deletes certain territory form the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area. The San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area totals approximately 3,393 acres and is comprised of noncontiguous areas situated along the City's commercial corridors and older neighborhoods. The boundaries of the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area are shown on the Redevelopment Project Area on Page 4. Adoption of this Plan does not approve any of the proposed programs or projects. Programs and projects to be undertaken by the Agency are subject to discretionary approvals by the Agency, as well as environmental clearance as determined by staff. Pursuant to Section 33490(a)(1)(B), adoption of an implementation plan shall not constitute a "project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), and inclusion of any project or program in the implementation plan shall not eliminate environmental analysis that would otherwise be required. FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN OBJECTIVES The Agency will begin several projects during the next Five -Year Implementation Plan. Economic development activities Will remain a priority for the Agency, to facilitate and encourage new development and businesses within the Project Area. In FY 2004-2005, a Facade Program to facilitate commercial facade improvements in the downtown area will be implemented. The Agency will continue to fund a portion of a Code Enforcement Officer to continue to address blight within the Project Area during Fiscal Years 2004-2005 and 2005-2006. Two new projects will also be initiated to encourage, promote, and assist in the development and expansion of local commerce and needed commercial development on the Sanderson/Ramona Expressway Corridor and along State Street. The Sanderson/Ramona Expressway Corridor is a major thoroughfare within the project area, which lacks infrastructure and has underdeveloped properties. The first phase is to develop a master plan for the Corridor, followed by completion of environmental documents which will provide for the ease of future development. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY THIRD FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PAGE 9 The State Street Project is to develop a plan for future improvements and to begin infrastructure improvements, induding street, curb, gutter, and missing sidewalks. Additionally during the term of this Plan, the Agency will repay existing debt and obligations. PRIOR PLAN PERIOD ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND REMAINING BLIGHTING CONDITIONS The Agency has actively pursued redevelopment of the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area (including the amendment area) since the original adoption of the Redevelopment Plan in 1983. The Agency completed various improvements, including the "Superblock", La Entrada Median Improvements, Sallee Park Pool, the General Plan Update, the Estudillo Mansion Porch and Balcony Restoration, and several agreements for financial assistance. TABLE 1-1 PROJECT BLIGHT REMOVAL Virginia Lee Economic Main Street Improvement Plans Infrastructure/Economic La Entrada Median Infrastructure/Economic YEAR FUNDING 1999 2000/2001 2000/2001 $340,750 $34,503 $50,000 Commercial Facade Loan — Maggie's Structural and Economic 2000/2001 $25,000 Business Development Loan — Precision Concepts Economic 200/02001 $20,000 General Plan Update Structural/Economic 2000/2004 $75,000 Estudillo Mansion — Porch and Balcony Restoration Restoration and Neighborhood Improvement 2001/2002 $75,000 Commercial Facade Loan — Miller Jones Structural and Economic 2001/2002 $10,000 915 Industrial Way Property Sale Economic 2001/2002 $280,000 Tony's Sea Landing Sale Economic/Business 2001/2002 $175,000 Ramona Expressway/Sanderson Waterline and Sewer Project Structural and Economic (Project 2002/2003 coordination) EDA Grant Economic Development Market Materials Economic 2002/2003 $25,000 Ramona/Taquitz Curb and Gutter Physical/Neighborhood 2002/2003 $48,087 Commercial Facade — National Scent Structural and Economic 2002/2003 $20,000 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY THIRD FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PAGE 10 During the Five -Year Implementation period, the Agency moved toward addressing and removing blight within the Redevelopment Project Area. Limited funding, due to property value decreases, constricted the Agency's ability to complete a number of projects planned. As a result, many projects listed in the 1999/2004 Implementation Plan were not completed. Future projections also showed limited Tax Increment available, therefore, the projects were re-evaluated and a determination made not to move forward on the uncompleted projects. Although funding was limited during the Plan period, the Agency moved forward on its economic development and marketing efforts, which resulted in the sale of several properties, both of which resulted in new businesses moving into the Project Area. In addition, staff worked closely on developing new marketing materials and working with developers on the development of a 25 acre commercial site and the potential sale of a remaining Agency owned parcel adjacent to the Superblock. FINANCIAL RESOURCES The first Five -Year Implementation Plan identified a number of projects and programs, as well as corresponding expenditures, which the Agency believed were most likely to occur over the First Five -Year Implementation Plan period. The second Five -Year Implementation Plan was limited in its ability to generate surplus tax increment given the recession and reduction in property values. This contributed to the Agency's limited ability to develop new projects and/or programs during this second Five - Year Implementation Plan. Table 2 on the following page presents the revenues (excluding low/moderate housing revenues) the Agency may have available over the next five (5) years to fund Implementation Plan activities. The projections are based on a 2% annual increase in secured assessed values over the five (5) year period. No growth rates were assumed for unsecured or utility values. Outlined in the tables are projected tax increment receipts, loan and debt service payments, and projected Agency administration costs. Funds available to implement future programs are identified as the remaining funds net of these operation and debt service obligations. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY THIRD FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PAGE 11 REVENUE AND PROJECTIONS TABLE TABLE 2 FIVE YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - SAN JACINTO NONHOUSING 1 2 3 4 5 Total 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008109 Beginning Cash Balance 88,705 18,797 3,654 8,536 9,003 88,705 Revenues Tax Increment Revenue (net of housing) $2,295,000 $2,340,900 $2,387,718 $2,435,472 $2,484,182 $ 11,943,272 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS $2,383,705 $2,359,697 $2,391,372 $2,444,008 $2,493,185 $12,031,977 Operations & Debt Service Costs Debt Service $1,218,388 $1,216,388 $1,214,388 $1,212,388 $1,210,388 $6,071,940 Taxing Agency Pass Through Payments 559,555 570,746 582,161 593,804 605,680 $2,911,947 Administration, Maintenance & Overhead 361,675 368,909 376,287 383,812 391,489 $1,882,171 ERAF 100,000 100,000 - $200,000 TOTAL $2,239,618 $2,256,043 $2,172,836 $2,190,005 $2,207,557 $11,066,058 FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR PROJECTS $144,087 $103,654 $218,536 $254,003 $285,628 $1,005,910 Projects & Programs Costs $125,290 $100,000 $210,000 $245,000 $260,000 $940,290 TOTAL COSTS $2,364,908 $2,356,043 $2,382,836 $2,435,005 $2,467,557 $12,006,348 FUND BALANCE SURPLUS/(SHORTFALL) $18,797 $3,654 $8,356 $9,003 $25,628 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY THIRD FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PAGE 12 ANTICIPATED PLANNING PERIOD PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS The following summary matrix for the San Jacinto Project Area describes the proposed non - housing programs and projects planned for the next five years (see Table 2-1). The matrix describes each proposed program, gives the projected time frame for implementation, identifies Agency goal's to be achieved, and identifies the blighting conditions the program will address. Anticipated program expenditures are based on projected tax increment revenue expected for FY 2004-05 to FY 2008-09. Greater or lesser funding may be available; depending upon actual assessed valuation changes in the San Jacinto Project Area. Anticipated expenditures are based upon preliminary staff estimates and are subject to change based upon available funding. Program Facade Grant Program Code Enforcement Program Sanderson/Ramona Expressway Code Enforcement Program Sanderson/Ramona Expressway State Street Master Plan State Street Master Plan Time Frame 2004-05 2004/05 Goal 1 - Elimination of blighted conditions Goals Achieved Goal 1 - Elimination of blighted conditions 2005/06 Goal 8 - Encourage development and commerce 2005/06 Goal 1 - Elimination of blighted conditions 2006/07 Goal 8 - Encourage development and commerce 2007/08 Goal 8 - Encourage development and commerce 2008/09 Goal 8 - Encourage developnent and commerce Blight Mitigated Structural Blight Structural Blight Economic Blight Structural Blight Economic Blight Economic Blight Economic Blight Estimated Agency Cost $90,000 $35,290 $64,000 $36,000 $210,000 $245,000 $260,000 GRAND TOTAL FIVE YEAR NON -HOUSING PROGRAM COST ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY THIRD FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN $940,290 PAGE 13 The Redevelopment Plan for the Soboba Springs Redevelopment Project Area ("Project Area") was approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of San Jacinto ("City Council") in November of 1983. The Redevelopment Plan has not been amended. The Soboba Springs Redevelopment Project Area encompasses approximately 465 acres. The anticipated initial projects list for the Project Area included the construction of a bridge across the San Jacinto River at Main Street and Lake Park Drive, and the necessary extension to accompany the bridge. This project was completed in FY 2001/2002 and no additional projects are planned at this time. Tax Increment generated by the Soboba Springs Redevelopment Project Area will be used for repayment of bonds and debt service for the Bridge Project. PRIOR PLAN PERIOD ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND REMAINING BLIGHTING CONDITIONS The Agency has actively pursued the construction of the Lake Park Bridge in the Soboba Springs Redevelopment Project Area. PROJECT TABLE 3 BLIGHT REMOVAL YEAR FUNDING Lake Park Bridge Improvements Infrastructure/Economic 1999/2000 2000/2001 $1,998,839 $4,293,895 Lake Park Wall Infrastructure/Economic 2001/2002 $51,908 Lake Park Improvements Infrastructure/Economic 2001/2002 $285,499 FINANCIAL RESOURCES Table 2 on the following page presents the revenues (excluding low/moderate housing revenues) the Agency may have available over the next five (5) years to fund bond and debt service for the Lake Park Bridge Project. The projections are based on a 2% annual increase in secured assessed values over the five (5) year period. No growth rates were assumed for unsecured or utility values. Outlined in the tables are projected tax increment receipts, loan and debt service payments, and projected Agency administration costs. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY THIRD FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PAGE 14 REVENUES & PROJECTIONS TABLE 3-1 1 2 3 4 5 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008/09 Total Beginning Cash Balance 122,337 22,040 83,477 133,527 171,482 Revenues <177,308> Tax Increment Revenue (net of housing) $472,500 $481,950 $491,589 $501,421 $511,449 $2,458,909 TOTAL $472,500 $481,950 $491,589 $501,421 $511,449 $2,458,909 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS $422,529 $503,990 $575,066 $634,931 $682,931 $2,819,464 Operations & Debt Service Costs Soboba Project $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Soboba Debt 400,489 420,513 441,539 463,616 486,791 $2,212,955 Administration, Maintenance & Overhead ERAF TOTAL $400,489 $420,513 $441,539 $463,616 $486,791 $2,212,955 FUND BALANCE SURPLUS/(SHORTFALL) $22,040 $83,477 $133,527 $171,482 $196,134 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY THIRD FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PAGE 15 As detailed in the Introduction of this Plan, the Agency is required to produce an Implementation Plan every five years. After adoption of the first implementation plan, a new plan is to be adopted every five years either in conjunction with the housing element cycle or the implementation plan cycle. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ADOPTION PROCESS Each Implementation Plan must be presented and adopted at a duly notice public hearing of the Agency. Notice of the public hearing must be conducted pursuant to this Section 33490 of the Law. The Notice must be published pursuant to Section 6063 of the Govemment Code, mailed at least three weeks in advance to all persons and agencies that have requested notice, and posted in at least four permanent places within the Project Area for a period of three weeks. Publication, mailing, and posting shall be completed not less than 10 days prior to the date set for hearing. The Agency may amend the implementation plan at any time after conducting a public hearing on the proposed amendment. MID-TERM IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REVEW PROCESS At least once within the five-year term of this Implementation Plan, the Agency must conduct a public hearing and hear testimony of all interested parties for the purpose of reviewing the redevelopment plan and the corresponding implementation for each redevelopment project. This hearing must take place no earlier than two years and no later than three years after the adoption of the Implementation Plan. ALLEVIATION OF BLIGHTING CONDITIONS The Agency proposes the implementation of programs and projects to provide a comprehensive program to stimulate new development and property rehabilitation in each of the project areas. The programs detailed above include: 1. Commercial facade rehabilitation for blight removal and revitalization. 2. Rehabilitation programs and new development activities to improve the City's stock of low and moderate -moderate -income housing. 3. Rehabilitation and construction of infrastructure. 4. Programs to rehabilitate old or obsolete structures to accommodate modem uses. 5. Enhancing the business community and community economic base. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY THIRD FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PAGE 16 Successful implementation of the programs and projects will result in expanded economic activity in the City and the project areas. Such activity will increase the number of local employment opportunities, expand the City tax base for the support of essential services, and reduce the costs to the community in providing such services. In addition, implementation of the above projects will alleviate detrimental physical conditions, including the need for re- parcelization, replacement of deteriorating and dilapidated land uses, and providing the needed public improvements for both project areas. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY THIRD FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PAGE 17 The RedeveiopmentAgency of the City of San Jacinto Five Year Implementation Plan -Housing Component (2004/05 through 2008/09) Ten -Year Affordable Housing Compliance Plan (2004/05 through 2013/14) December 16, 2004 Prepared For The R.edeveiopmentAgency of the City of San Jacinto Agency 201 East Main Street San Jacinto, CA 92 292 Prepared By: RSG INTELLIGENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP INC. 309 WEST 4TH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701-4502 PHONE: (714) 541-4585 FAX: (714) 541-1175 E-MAIL: INFOWEBRSG.COM Housing • • • to the Five Year 1 & Ten -Year . - .Housing Compliance Plan The Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto Table of Contents Introduction 1 Legal Requirements for Housing Compliance Plans 1 Compliance with AB 637 and SB 701 2 Contents of the Housing Compliance Plan 3 Purpose 3 Methodology and Data Compilation 4 Housing Goals and Objectives 4 Affordable Housing Production Needs 6 Definitions and Data Compilation 6 Units Constructed or Substantially Rehabilitated Within the Project Areas 7 Aggregation of Affordable Housing Units Amongst All Project Areas8 Affordable Housing Provided Outside of the Project Areas 9 Inclusionary Housing Obligation Status 9 Inventory of Existing Deed -Restricted Units 10 Affordable Units Required 12 Past Inclusionary Unit Need 14 Current Five & Ten Year Period Inclusionary Unit Need 14 Replacement Housing Production Needs 15 Estimated Housing Fund Resources & Projected Expenditures 17 Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund 17 Targeting of Housing Fund Expenditures 19 G:1RSGISANJACINTOI2005IMPLEMENTATION PLAN\NEW REPORTSISAN JACINTO HOUSING PLAN.DOC Income Categories Assisted 19 Family and Senior Housing 20 Other Funding Sources for Housing Programs 21 Other City/Agency Revenues. 22 Federal/State Revenue Sources 22. Proposed Implementation Initiatives 23 Future Housing Projects and Programs 23 Single Family Residential Rehabilitation Programs 23 Infill Housing Program 24 Developer Proposed Projects 245 Density Bonus 25 Inclusionary Housing Ordinance 25 Fair Housing 25 Affordable Housing Geographic Distribution 26 Housing Fund Expenditures 1999100 through 2003104 26 Housing Element Consistency 27 Housing• to the Five Year I & Ten -Year Affordable Housing Conyliance Plan The Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto This document is the Housing Component for the 2004-05 the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto ("the Agency") Five -Year Implementation Plan and Ten Year Affordable Housing Compliance Plan (the "Housing Compliance Plan"). This Housing Compliance Plan accompanies the Agency's Five Year Implementation Plan, which was adopted along with this Housing Compliance Plan by the Agency following a duly noticed public hearing held on December 16, 2004. This Housing Compliance Plan covers collectively the Agency's two Redevelopment Project Areas: • San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area ■ Soboba Springs Redevelopment Project Area All of the above mentioned redevelopment projects are collectively referred to as the "the Project Areas". The Agency's first redevelopment project area, the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area, was adopted in 1983. The Soboba Springs Redevelopment Project Area was also adopted in 1983. The two (2) adopted Project Areas encompass an estimated 3,858 acres of the Citys incorporated territory. The Housing Compliance Plan serves as a blueprint for current and future Agency activities outlining how it will meet its low and moderate income housing responsibilities and eliminate blight. This Housing Compliance Plan presents a summary of the Agency's inclusionary and replacement housing program as mandated by Sections 33413(b)(4) and 33490(a)(2) and (3) of the California Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et. sec. ("Law"). Specifically, it presents a forecast of the number of affordable housing units that may be needed over the ten year planning period (fiscal years 2004-05 through 2013-14) and the Agency's plans to facilitate the creation of the required number of affordable housing units within this timeframe. Legal Requirements for Housing Compliance Plans Pursuant to the requirements of Section 33413(b)(4) and 33490(a)(2) and (3) of the Law, this Housing Compliance Plan sets forth the Agency's program for ensuring that the appropriate number of very low, low, and moderate -income housing units will be produced as a result of new construction or substantial rehabilitation. In addition, this Housing Compliance Plan is to address the Agency's plans to develop replacement housing destroyed or removed as a result of Agency participation in a redevelopment project. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 1 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Compliance with AB 637 and SB 701 This Housing Compliance Plan is consistent with recent changes enacted into the Law pursuant to Assembly Bill 637 (Lowenthal) and Senate Bill 701 (Torlakson). Among these significant amendments are: ➢ Periods of Affordability Restriction: That an agency must adopt and periodically update an affordable housing production plan to ensure compliance with the Law specifically addressing the lengthen restrictive periods of affordability for assisted low and moderate income housing units. ➢ 55/45 Year Minimum Affordability Periods: Effective January 1, 2002, all units assisted by the Housing Fund, replacement housing, and production housing must be affordable for 55 years (rental units) or 45 years (owner - occupied units). Units assisted, rehabilitated or constructed prior to January 1, 2002 may have shorter time limits. ➢ Substantial Rehabilitation: Between January 2002 and January 2006, a redevelopment agency is only required to include in its housing production obligations those numbers of units generated by the substantial rehabilitation units assisted by the agency. Outside of this time frame, substantial rehabilitation of single family units assisted by the agency and any multifamily units count towards the production requirement. ➢ Replacement Housing: All redevelopment project areas adopted after January 1976 replace one (1) for one (1) each unit destroyed by an agency. Effective January 1, 2002, 100% of all replacement housing units must be affordable to the same income categories as those displaced by an Agency project. Previously, only 75% of the units had to match the displaced units income group. ➢ Targeting Housing Fund Expenditures: Effective January 2003, the Law now requires that Housing Fund assistance during the 10-year Housing Compliance Plan mirror the community's needs, both in terms of the income categories needed, and the number of family (versus senior) housing needed.' (The Law provides an additional five years to meet this requirement if an agency deposited less than $2 million over the first five years of the Housing Compliance Plan.) Allocation of a redevelopment agency's tax increment housing set aside dollars must at a minimum be allocated to very low and low income persons at least in the same proportion to the very low, low and moderate income unit need identified in the community's housing element (as established by the regions housing needs allocation). Additionally housing set aside funds allocated for person 65 years of age or older must not exceed the proportion of there number to the general population. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 2 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Methodology and Data Compilation This Housing Strategy takes into account all residential construction or substantial rehabilitation that has occurred within the Project Areas since their adoption. Information from both the Planning and Building Divisions of the City's Community Development Department was provided and reviewed in order to account for such units and thereby calculate the Agency's overall affordable housing production needs. The Strategy accounts for existing residential construction and substantial rehabilitation, and includes projections of new dwelling units that may be constructed or substantially rehabilitated during the ten-year planning period and over the remaining period for which each of the Project Areas Redevelopment Plans are effective. Housing Goals and Objectives The housing goals and objectives for the term of this Housing Compliance Plan are: ❖ To increase, improve, and preserve the Community's supply of low and moderate income housing citywide. ❖ To comply with the replacement and inclusionary housing requirements mandated by Law. ❖ To leverage the Agency's Housing Funds with other resources in order to promote affordable housing. To insure that the dollars spent for general administrative activities are not disproportionate to the amounts actually spent to produce, increase, and preserve housing. • ❖ To give priority to housing proposals that will eliminate or prevent the spread of blight Citywide and decrease excess demands on public services such as police, code enforcement, and building and safety within the Project Areas. • To continue efforts to stimulate the construction of affordable infill housing units on a community wide basis. ❖ To encourage the development and rehabilitation of affordable multifamily rental housing units. ❖ To utilize the goals and policies established in the City's Draft Housing Element to guide the efforts of the Agency in its development of future affordable housing programs. ❖ To assist the City in the development and implementation on an Inclusionary Housing Ordinance that would require at least 15% of all new housing units be restricted and affordable to persons and families that are classified as very low, low and moderate income. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 4 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY To provide financial incentives to enable Inclusionary Housing Units produced by the City's proposed Inclusionary Ordinance to contain restrictive covenants consistent with the CRL, ensuring that such units remain affordable for 45 years for ownership units and 55 years for rental units. Since the adoption of the first Housing Compliance Plan in 1994, the Agency through the efforts of the Community Development Department has actively pursued projects, programs, and activities that meet the Agency's goals as set out above. The City's comprehensive housing program will continue to be implemented through the Housing Compliance Plan. The programs included are designed to significantly improve and upgrade the Community's housing stock and improve the overall quality of life of San Jacinto residents. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 5 & Ten-Year Housimg • • - i• Housing Compliance Plan to the Five Year 1 The Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto r r• Affordable Housing Production Needs This section describes the Agency's production needs for the ten year planning period (2004-05 through 2013-14) and over the duration of the Redevelopment Plan. Definitions and Data Compilation This Housing Compliance Plan takes into account all residential construction or substantial rehabilitation that has occurred within the Project Areas since their adoptions in order to determine affordable housing production needs. This Housing Compliance Plan includes figures for existing residential construction and substantial rehabilitation, and projections for the number of additional dwelling units to be constructed or substantially rehabilitated during the next ten (10) years. The following sections define "new construction" and "substantially rehabilitated" as used in this Housing Compliance Plan, as well as the methodology used for collecting data on both existing and projected housing units. ➢ New Construction. Agency staff and City Planning staff provided original construction statistics used in the 1994 Housing Compliance Plan. The Law does not provide a clear definition for new construction. For the purposes of this Housing Compliance Plan, new construction represents building permits issued for the construction of new dwelling units actually built since the respective adoption dates of the Project Areas until the 1994 Housing Compliance Plan preparation were counted and considered to be new construction dwelling units; therefore, these units would fall under the requirements for production of affordable housing within the Project Areas pursuant to Section 33413 of the Law. Projections of new units from 1994 through 2004 have been based upon the established projections and estimates contained in the 1994 Housing Compliance Plan. • Projections are affected by numerous complex factors such as: the general health of the local, regional, and national economy; employment levels; competition; practices and health institutions and inventory of existing housing. Based upon the recent economic trends, projection of the number of new units to be constructed over the next ten (10) years is difficult. Table 1 accounts for all units constructed through June of 2004, with inclusionary unit numbers adjusted accordingly. • Future projections of new units have been based once again on Draft General Plan and current development projects. Staff does not anticipate that the Project Areas will experience build out within the next ten (10) year time frame (2004/05 through 2008/09) covered by this Housing Compliance Plan but will within the term of each of the Redevelopment ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 6 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Plans, Projections of future units have been evenly distributed over the remaining life of each of the Project Areas. Substantial Rehabilitation. The CRL, as amended by AB 1290, defines "substantial rehabilitation" as: • '...rehabNtation, the value of which constitutes 25 percent of the after rehabilitation value of the dwelling, inclusive of the land value." 33413(b)(2)(A)(iv) As defined by the CRL "substantially rehabilitated dwelling units" means: • "On or after January 1, 2002, ......substantially rehabilitated dwelling units means all units substantially rehabilitated, with agency assistance. Prior to January 1, 2002 substantially rehabilitated dwelling units means multifamily rented dwelling units with three or more units or substantially rehabilitated regardless of whether there is agency assistance and, with agency assistance, single-family dwelling units with one or two units." 33413(b)(2)(A)(iii) Units Constructed or Substantially Rehabilitated Within the Project Areas Table 1 on the following page details by Project Area the number of units built or substantially rehabilitated within the Project Areas since adoption of the respective Redevelopment Plans. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 7 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TABLE 1 UNITS CONSTRUCTED OR REHABILITATED Units through December 1994 Units Constructed Agency Developed Units San Jacinto and Soboba Project Areas Total 0 0 Privately Developed Units 854 854 SUBTOTAL 854 854 Units Substantially Rehabilitated TOTAL NEW/REHABILITATED UNITS 854 854 Units January 1, 1995-December 1999 Substatial Rehabilitation Jordan Street and Shaver 3 3 640 S. Shaver 10 10 New Construction Brown Street (Habitat) 3 3 Third Street 6 6 Dana Court 3 3 Sixth Street 6 6 Privately Developed Units 52 52 SUBTOTAL 83 83 Units January 1, 2000-June 2004 Substatial Rehabilitation 0 New Construction Habitat For Humanity 2 2 Privately Developed Units 198 198 SUBTOTAL 200 200 TOTAL NEW/REHABILITATED UNITS 1,137 1,137 Aggregation of Affordable Housing Units Amongst All Project Areas Section 33413 (b)(2)(A)(v) provides that redevelopment agencies may "aggregate new or substantially rehabilitated dwelling units in one or more project areas if the agency, finds based upon substantial evidence, after a public hearing, that the aggregation will not cause or exacerbate racial, ethnic, or economic segregation." ROSENOW SPEVACEKGROUP, INC. PAGE8 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The Agency will consider action at the Public Hearing to consider for adoption this Housing Compliance Plan. It is anticipated that based upon the evidence provided the Agency will find that the aggregation of its affordable housing obligations between its Project Areas, is of benefit to the Project Areas and the community, and that such aggregation will not cause or exacerbate racial, ethnic, or economic segregation. Affordable Housing Provided Outside of the Project Areas Section 33413(b)(2)(A)(ii) provides that the Agencys obligations under Section 33413 may be met by providing affordable housing outside the project areas on a two -for -one basis. During the adoption process for each of the Project Areas, the Agency adopted appropriate resolutions that allow the Agency to expend its twenty percent (20%) housing set -aside money outside of each respective Project Area by making findings that it will be of benefit to each Project Area. Inclusionary Housing Obligation Status Table 2 below details the Agency's inclusionary housing obligation status with updated total units constructed to date in the Project Areas, and those expected to be constructed from 2004 through the term expiration of each of the Redevelopment Plans. The inclusionary information is expected to be updated with the completion of the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and analysis. TABLE 2 Inclusionary Housing Obligation Status Private Development Project Area Developed/ Rehabilitated Number of Units Produced Total Number of Very Low, Low & Moderate Units Required VL Units Required Over Life of Plan L $ M Units Required Over Life of Plan San Jacinto and Soboba Built from date of adopt through December 31, 1994 Private/15% 854 128 51 77 SUBTOTAL 854 128 51 77 w o 1995-200 Substantially Rehabilitated Private/15% 0 0 38 38 8 225 0 15 15 3 90 0 23 23 5 135 New Construction Private/15% 250 SUBTOTAL 250 2nd 10 Yrs 2004/05- 13/14 Substantially Rehabilitated Private/15% 50 New Construction Private/15% 1500 SUBTOTAL 1550 233 93 140 Units Expected to be Built/Provided Over Remaining Project Term 2500 375 150 225 TOTAL UNITS OVER TERM OF PLAN 5154 773 309 464 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 9 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Inventory of Existing Deed -Restricted Units The Agency is obligated under 33490 to ensure that 15% of non -Agency developed units (and 30% of all Agency developed units)' are affordable to very low, low and moderate income households, featuring covenants that extend to at least the duration of the Redevelopment Plan. To satisfy the Agency's production needs, units that are either developed or substantially rehabilitated must be covered by restrictive covenants. Housing units created or assisted after 2001 must carry 45-year covenants for single family units and 55-year affordability covenants on multifamily units.2 Units may be constructed inside or outside the Project Area, but units provided outside a project area count on a 2-for-1 basis. The Agency may also purchase 55-year affordability covenants on multifamily units. 245 years for ownership units or 55 years for rental units. Prior to January 1, 2002, affordability covenants could be as little as the duration of the redevelopment plan to count for meeting a redevelopment agency's affordable housing production requirements. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 10 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TABLE 3 LIST OF INCLUSIONARY HOUSING UNITS m EL Projects 1' Unit Break down # Units Very Low # Units Low # of Units Mod Total # of Units Terms of CC&R Within/ Outside PA's Full or 50% Credit Through 1994 Total Credit Total Credit Total Credit Total Credit Total Area- wide n/a 55 55 40 40 48 48 143 143.0 Un- known Subtotal 55 55 40 40 48 48 143 143 1995 & 1996 Jordan and Shaver 3 3 bdrm 3 3 0.0 10- year 640 S. Shaver(10 Units rehab) 10 5 5 0.0 10- year Stret 3 bdrm 3 3 3 3.0 year Full Third Street 3 bdrm 6 6 0.0 year Subtotal 3 3 8 0 6 0 17 3 1997 Dana Court 3 bdrm 1 1 1 3 0.0 year Subtotal 1 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 1998 Homebuyer Loans 6 6 0.0 10- year Subtotal 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 1999 Homebuyer Loans 1 5 0 6 0.0 10- year Subtotal 0 0 1 0 5 0 6 0 2000 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2001 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2002 Old Second Street 3 bdrm 1 0.5 1 1 0.5 55- year o 50% Subtotal 1 0.5 0 0 0 0 1 0.5 0.5 2003 Sixth Street 3 bdrm 1 1 1 1.0 55- year Full Subtotal 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2004 Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 61 59.5 50 40 66 48 177 147.5 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 11 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY As required by Section 33490 of the Law, Table 3 on the previous page presents an inventory of the Agency's existing deed -restricted affordable units. To date, the Agency's efforts have yielded 177 affordable units. The Agency's inclusionary unit need has been credited with 147.5 restricted units. 3 Of the 147.5 credited restricted units provided, 59.5 affordable units are reserved for very low income, 40 are low income units and 48 are moderate income units. Affordable Units Required Section 33413(b) of the Law requires that not less than 30% of any Agency - developed units ("30% Units) or 15% of privately developed units ("15% Units) produced during the next five and ten year period be affordable to low and moderate income households. The Law also requires that 50% of the 30% Units and 40% of the 15% Units be specifically limited and affordable to very low income households. These affordable housing production requirements should be met during the next two 5-year periods, which ends on June 30 of fiscal year 2013-14. Based upon the forecast of housing construction presented earlier and inventory of affordable housing projects completed to date, Table 4 presents the computation of the Agency's affordable housing production requirement for the 10-year planning period, as well as the entire duration of each of the Redevelopment Plans. 3 Pursuant to Section 33413 (b)(ii) of the Law, the Agency may provide two inclusionary units outside the Project Areas for each required restricted affordable unit. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 12 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. New Construction Substantial Rehab. I?, Inctusionary Requirement Low/Mod. Requirement Very Low Requirement Inctusionary Production Low/Mod Production Very Low Production Inctusionary Need (-) or Surplus+ Very Low Need or Surplus TIME FRAME Through 6-30-94 (Actual) Agency Developed 1/ 0 0 Through 6-30-94 (Actual) Privately Developed 1/ 854 0 854 128 77 51 Total Pre 1994/95 854 0 854 128 77 51 Pre 94/95Affordable Inclusionary Units Produced and Restricted/Requirement Met 143.0 88.0 55.0 15 4.0 lst 10-Year Planning Period (1994/95 - 2003/04) 4.5 0.0 4.5 Pre 94/95Affordable Inclusionary Units Excess Credit 15.0 11.0 4.0 1994/95 through 2003/04 Agency Developed - Privately Developed 18 13 31 9 5 5 4.5 0 4.5 250 38 23 15 0 0 0 Total 1st 10 Yr. Planning Period 268 13 31 47 27 20 20 11.0 8.5 -27 -11 2nd 10 -Year Planning Period (2004/05.2013/14) -27 -16 -11 11ST 5 YEARS -2004/05 -08/09 1st 10-year deficit units 27 16 11 Projected Units 04/05-08/09 Agency Developed - 50 50 15.0 8 8 Privately Developed 750 50 800 120 72 48 SUBTOTAL 750 100 850 135 80 56 Units Planned in 04/05 = 135 80 48 SUBTOTAL UNITS NEEDED FOR 1ST 5 YEAR PERIOD 162 96 59 2ND 5 YEARS-2009/10-13/14 Projected Units Agency Developed - 30 30 0 0 0 Privately Developed SUBTOTAL 750 50 800 120 72I 48 750 80 830 120 72i 48 120 70 48 Total 2nd 10 -Year Planning Period (2004/05-2013/14) 1,500 180 1,680 255 1521 104 282 166 107 Housing & Ten -Year Afforciable Housing Compliance Plan The Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto to the Five Year Past Inclusionary Unit Need 1 r; I 1 `. Plan The Agency has worked to produce the required number of inclusionary units over the last ten years, producing 177 units (with a credit of 147.5 units -see Table 3). However, the Agency's prior ten-year assessment of required inclusionary units was substantially less than the update figure that appears in Table 4 above. This increase in the number of affordable units needed is the result of the housing boom that has occurred over the last five years with a concentration of home construction occurring over the three years and anticipated future development. Much of the new housing built in San Jacinto and the Project Areas, has been affordable to moderate income households, although they have not been covered by restrictive covenants. This accelerated building of new units has exacerbated the Agency's inclusionary unit need. To the Agency's credit their efforts at creating affordable housing has focused on the very low income category, producing a total of 59.5 affordable very low income units for a total inclusionary credit of 59.5 very low income units. Therefore, as compared to the number of units produced during the planning period, the Agency will still need to implement additional affordable housing programs to meet the units needed for low and moderate income households to address the unit deficit. To addresses this additional unit need, 282 inclusionary units must be developed. The Agency will utilize its Housing Rehabilitation need to provide approximately 50 units, however additional units will need to be provided by private development. The Agency will work with the City inthe development and implementation of an Inclusionary Housing Ordinance that requires at least 15% of all new units be reserved and restricted as affordable to very low, low and moderate income persons or families. The City and Agency are working to complete the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. It is anticipated that the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance will be enacted in 2005. The Agency will utilize its Housing Fund dollars to insure that these Inclusionary Units are reserved for the time periods required by the CRL. Current Five & Ten Year Period Inclusionary Unit Need As detailed in Table 4, for the next five years (2004/05 through 2008/09), the Agency must create or provide a total of 59 restricted very low, low and moderate affordable housing units. The ten year projected need (2004/05 through 2013/14) identified by this Compliance Plan is 107 restricted very low, low and moderate affordable housing units. Additionally, as required by Section 33413 (b)(4) of the Law, the Agency will address the unmet units need from the prior 10 year period during this 10 Year (2004/05 -2013/14) Housing Compliance Plan period. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 14 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Therefore, during the Agency's 1st 5-Year period (2004/05-08/09) the Agency must create, preserve and restrict a total of 135 affordable units. The Agency's 10-year affordable housing need is for a total of 282 restricted affordable units. During the next 5-Year period, the Agency intends to focus its efforts on creating and preserving very low income affordable units. Since very low income units are the most difficult to create and reserve both logistically and financially, Agency staff intends to its concentrate its efforts on these difficult units. It is assumed that with the adoption of the City's InclusionaryHousing Ordinance, the Agency will be able to use this tool to achieve its needed low and moderate income housing units. Replacement Housing Production Needs The Law requires that whenever housing units occupied by low and moderate income persons or households are destroyed as part of an Agency project, the Agency is responsible for ensuring that an equivalent number of replacement units are constructed or substantially rehabilitated within the community. These units must provide at least the same number of bedrooms destroyed, and 100% of the replacement units4 must be affordable to the same income categories (i.e. very low, low, and moderate) as those removed. The Agency receives a full credit for replacement units created inside or outside the Project Area. The Agency has participated in redevelopment projects that have resulted in the loss affordable units through. Table 5 presents a summary of the affordable housing units destroyed. TABLE 5 DWELLING UNITS DESTROYED OR REMOVED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY BY THE AGENCY PRIOR TO 1999 Project Area Units Destroyed/ Removed Very Low Units Low Units Moderate Units Jordan and Shaver Street 5 5 TOTAL 5 0 5 0 UNITS REMOVED FROM 1999 THROUGH 6-30-2004 Address Units Destroyed/ Removed Very Low Income Units Low Income Units Moderate Units 252 W Sixth Street 1 1 TOTAL 1 1 0 0 4 Prior to January 1, 2002, 75% of all replacement units must be of the same income category as those displaced. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 15 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Table 6 below, identifies those replacement units the Agency has created or reserved to meet its replacement housing obligations as summarized in Table 5. TABLE 6 INVENTORY OF REPLACEMENT HOUSING UNITS Project Area # of Units Applied Total # of Bedrooms how Units Low- Units Moderate - Units Total of Demolished Housing Units Prior to 1999 (Table I -A) 5 Unknown 5 Replacement Units (under 75% rule) San Jordan Street Jacinto 3 3 bedroom 3 San Brown Street Jacinto 3 3 bedroom 3 San Third Street Jacinto 6 3 bedroom 6 Table I -A Replacement Need Met 12 3 9 0 Project Area # of Units Applied Total # of Bedrooms Very Low- Units Low- Units Moderate - Units Total of Demolished Housing Units From 1999 to 2002 (Table I-B) Replacement Units (at 100% of same income type or lower) San Sixth Street Jacinto 1 3 bedroom 1 Table I-B Replacement Need Met REPLACEMENT NEED OR CREDIT 1 1 0 0 The Agency does not anticipate demolishing or removing any additional affordable dwelling units during this five and ten year planning period. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 16 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund 'tvw 04,4 One of the Agency's primary sources of revenues for housing program implementation is the annual 20% housing set -aside deposits. These deposits reside in the Agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund (the "Housing Fund"). The Law requires that not less than 20% of all tax increment revenue allocated to the Agency must be used to increase, improve, and preserve the community's supply of housing available, at affordable housing cost, to persons and families of very low, low, and moderate incomes. Other sources of Housing Fund revenues include interest earnings, loan repayments, federal HOME and HELP funds, and developer loan proceeds. Table 7 presents staffs forecast of Housing Fund revenues and debt service for this five year Implementation Plan period. Pursuant to the requirements of Section 33490, Table 7 identifies estimated amounts of available Housing Fund dollars expected to be deposited into the Housing Fund during each of the next five years. It also estimates the number of new, rehabilitated, or price -restricted units to be assisted as well as expenditures of Housing Fund monies during each of the five years. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 17 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Table 7 San Jacinto Redevelopment Plan -Low & Moderate Income Housing Fund Five Year Implementation Plan -Housing Component Projections of Revenue/Expenditures and Affordable Units Total 5-Year Period Year 1 2004-05 Year 2 2005-06 Year 3 2006-07 Year 4 2007-08 Year 5 2008-09 Beginning Cash Balance $475,000 1,460,313 - $484,500 504,924 $494,190 22,927 $504,074 20,791 $514,155 23,611 $2,471,919 1,460,313 Tax Increment Set Aside Revenue Prior Year Fund Land Sale Proceeds TOTAL $1,935,313 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS $1,935,313 $989,424 517,117 524,864 537,766 $3,932,232 $305,389 $241,497 $246,327 $251,253 $256,278 $1,300,744 Program Operation, Administration & Debt Service Costs Operations, Administration & Other Costs* TOTAL $305,389 $241,497 $246,327 $251,253 $256,278 $1,300,744 NET REVENUE AVAILABLE FOR PROJECTS $1,629,924 $747,927 $270,791 $273,611 $281,488 $2,631,488 Projects & Programs Costs $700,000 400,000 25,000 - $1,125,000 $1,125,000 $200,000 - 25,000 500,000 $725,000 $725,000 $225,000 - 25,000 $250,000 $250,000 $225,000 - 25,000 $250,000 $250,000 $200,000 - 25,000 $225,000 $225,000 $1,550,000 $400,000 125,000 $500,000 $2,575,000 $2,575,000 Housing Development Single -Family kehabilitation Program Other Housing Programs (Rental Rehabilitatioin) Emergency Grant Program Rental Rehabilitation Program Subtotal Housing Programs Other Costs N/A Subtotal TOTAL EXPENDITURES Ending Cash Balance $504,924 $22,927 $20,791 $23,611 $56,488 $56,488 Notes: Administration for FY 2004/2005 included budgets for advertising and the Housing Element as one time expenditures. Number of Affordable Units Reserved/Total Number of Very Low Units Reserved Total $2,575,000 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 18 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Targeting of Housing Fund Expenditures As set forth by Section 33333.4 of the Law, each agency shall expend, over the duration of the Housing Compliance Plan, the moneys in the Housing Fund in proportion to the community need, both in terms of the income categories and the number of senior households assisted. Income Categories Assisted Pursuant to Section 33334.4(a) of the Law, Housing Fund dollars must be expended for very low and low income person in at least the same proportion to the City's fair share unit need as established by the Regional Housing Need Assessment (RHNA) for very low, low and moderate income units. The number of units in each income category In the City's RHNA figures may be adjusted for units not assisted by the Agency that feature 55 or 45 year covenants. According to the City's Draft Housing Element, the current RHNA figures for the City cover the time period of 1998 through 2005. Table 8 indicates a Citywide need for 1,795 upper income units, 1,267 moderate income units, 898 low income units, and 1,379 very low income units. Table 9 utilizes the unit need by income to arrive at the proportional spending minimums imposed by the 2002 changes made in the Law. Based on these figures, the Agency's Housing Fund expenditures over the next 10 years must be at a minimum directed as follows: 26% must be allocated to projects or programs for very low income persons and 17% for low income persons. The remaining 57% of Housing Fund dollars may be allocated among very low, low and moderated income persons at the Agency's discretion. Table 8 City of San Jacinto Regional Housing Needs by Income Group (RHNA) 1998-2005 Income Category Housing Units Percent of Total Very Low (0-50% County median income) 1,379 26% Low (50-80% County median income) 898 17% Moderate (80-120% County median income) 1,267 24% Upper (over 120% County median income) 1,795 34% Total Housing Units/1 5,339 100% Source: City of San Jacinto 2004 Housing Element of the General Plan based upon SCAG's Regional Housing Needs Assessment. 1/ Figures have been updated through 2001. Current RHNA time frame is January 11998 through June 30, 2005. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 19 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Table 9 Housing Fund 10 Year Allocation of Resources Goal Proportional Allocation of Set -Aside Funds/Per Housing Element (RHNA) Income Category Remaining Housing Need Percentage to Total Very Low (0-50% County median income) Low (50-80% County median income) Moderate (80-120% County median income) Total Housing Units 1,365 0 2,368 3,733 26% 17% 57% 100% Family and Senior Housing Section 33334.4(b) requires that Housing Fund expenditures for senior housing also be in proportion to the community's population of that age, according to the most recent Census. According to the 2000 Census, 4,090 (17.2%) of the City's 23,779 residents were over the age of 65. As such, not more than 17.2% of the Agency available housing fund revenues may be expended on senior housing projects. Table 10 City of San Jacinto 2004-05 through 2013/14 Ten Year Housing Fund Restrictions on Over Allocation of Resources to Elderly Age Group Total Number of Persons Set -Aside Funds Allocation of Housing Under 65 Years of Age 65 Years of Age or older 19,689 82.8% 4,090 17.2% Total Persons 23,779 100.0% Table 11 presents a summary of the Agency's projected available dollar resources for the 10-year period with estimates of the proportional expenditures based upon the City's current RHNA needs (see Table 9). Additionally, pursuant to 33334.4 (b) of the Law, it is projected that over the 10 year period the Agency shall limit it expenditure for housing reserved for seniors (65 years of age or older) to 17.2% as shown in Table 11 below. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 20 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Table 11 Ten Year CompliancePlan Projected Housing Fund Resources ' Projected 10 Year Total Beginning Cash Balance $1,460,313 Tax Increment Set Aside Revenue Interest Income, Loans & Misc. $5,201,117 - TOTAL $6,661,430 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS $6,661,430 Total Debt Service/Admin& Operations $2,661,000 NET REVENUE AVAILABLE FOR PROJECTS $4,000,430 Assumed Minimum Allocation of Funds by Income Group-10 Yrs 26.0% Very Low Income o.o% Low Income 74.o% Unrestricted (very low, low and moderate) $1,040,112 $0 $2,960,318 100.0% TOTAL PROJECTED FUNDS AVAILABLE Senior Population Limitation (65 years and older)-% $4,000,430 $688,074 Other Funding Sources for Housing Programs All potential sources of funding will be actively pursued by the Agency in its efforts to implement the City's Draft Housing Element and Housing Activities. Key to this effort continues to be the establishment of relationships between public entities (especially the City) and the private sector. In recent years, San Jacinto's real estate market has improved due to the strong economy and increased demand for relatively affordable housing outside of Orange and Los Angeles County. San Jacinto's housing program recognizes that the "market" will drive certain aspects of producing affordable housing. Market factors have, and will continue to impact the amount of housing the Agency can effectuate given current revenues. Therefore, efforts to cooperate with other public entities and especially with the private sector, continues to be a priority. The goal being to produce, improve and protect the City's housing stock utilizing the Agency funds as leverage. In particular, the Community Development Department will actively pursue the rehabilitation of single family units and multifamily projects, as a vehicle to engage the private sector. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 21 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Other City/Agency Revenues. Existing Agency funding requirements for the non -housing redevelopment funds include outstanding bonded debt obligations; pass through payments to taxing agencies, required programs/projects, rent and administrative costs. Because of these heavy funding commitments, no revenue from the Agency's Redevelopment (non -housing) Fund will be available to assist with the implementation of affordable housing projects. Federal/State Revenue Sources Federal Programs The City of San Jacinto receives Community Development Block Grant funding from the County of Riverside Economic Development Agency. The City of San Jacinto uses these federal funds to leverage additional public and private investment to fund activities that benefit very low to moderate income households. ❑ Community Development Block Grant The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program was established under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. The City of San Jacinto is a participating city under the Riverside County Economic Development Agency. Use of CDBG funds must primarily benefit low to moderate income households. The City uses CDBG program funds primarily for infrastructure and supportive services in low-income areas. The City's CDBG allocation from Riverside County in FY 2004-2005 was $235,000. ❑ State Programs. The Agency may utilize available affordable housing resources administered by the State Department of Housing and Community Development. Potential State housing programs, which could be utilized, include: o California Housing Finance Agency (CHFA) Multifamily Housing Rental Program: Provides below market rate financing through the issuance of tax-exempt bonds to builders and developers of multi -family and elderly rental housing. o CHFA Home Mortgage Purchase Program: CHFA sells tax- exempt bonds to make below market interest rate loans to first time homebuyers. The program operates through participating lenders who originate loans for CHFA purchase. o California Housing Rehabilitation Program Owner Occupant Component (CHPRO): Provides low interest loans for the rehabilitation of substandard homes owned and occupied by lower -income households. City and non -profits sponsor housing rehabilitation projects. o Multifamily Affordable Housing Program (MAP): Provides permanent financing ; monies for the acquisition, rehabilitation, preservation and new construction of affordable rental housing. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 22 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ❑ Other Financial Resources o Low Income Housing Tax Credit: As part of the 1986 Tax Reform Act, units rent limited at 60% of median income and below are eligible to receive financial assistance under the tax credit program. The tax credit allocation process is extremely competitive both on a statewide and regional basis. o Tax Exempt Multifamily Mortgage Revenues Bonds: Use of the Mortgage Revenue Bonds is possible if one of the following criteria is met: at least twenty percent (20%) of the completed units are rented to households at or below fifty percent (50%) of the area median gross income; or at least forty percent (40%) of the units are rented to households at or below sixty percent (60%) of the area median gross income. Rents on tax credit units cannot exceed thirty percent (30%) of the maximum income limits based upon household size. ❑ Agency Financing. The Agency has the legal power to issue taxable or tax exempt bonds and notes for the development (including rehabilitation) of both single family and multifamily housing. Such said bonds would be issued under established federal and state requirements. o Affordable Housing Program (AHP) Grant: AHP provides grants through Federal Reserve banks for the preservation and creation of affordable housing opportunities for families of very low and low income. Though the Agency anticipates that the following additional affordable housing projects will be undertaken, in order to meet long-term affordable housing needs for the Project Area and the community as a whole. These projects are described below. Future Housing Projects and Programs Single Family Housing Rehabilitation Programs The Agency is involved in several single family rehabilitation programs geared towards major and minor repairs and renovations. The Housing Rehabilitation Program provides grants up to $30,000 to rehabilitate owner occupied single-family homes. The Program includes the provisions for forty-five (45) affordability covenants. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 23 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The Emergency Grant Program provides $3,000 grants to income qualified homeowners for emergency repairs such as unsanitary plumbing, hazardous electrical, sewer line or septic failures, or other catastrophic damage to the home. Though this activity would not result in significant rehabilitation to assist in meeting long-term affordable housing production goals, these efforts are critical to reducing the number of deteriorating and/or at -risk housing units in the City. Single-family Rehabilitation $2,550,000/Emergency Grant $250,000 Anticipated Expenditures During Planning Period: $2,800,000 Rental Housing Rehabilitation Program The Agency is developing a Rental Housing Rehabilitation Program geared towards major repairs and renovations, primarily for multi -family housing projects. The Rental Housing Rehabilitation Program will provide loans to rehabilitate rental housing units. The Program includes the provisions for fifty-five (55) affordability covenants. Anticipated Expenditures During Planning Period: $1,200,000 Code Enforcement Program As part of the City's Neighborhood Strategy, Code Enforcement staff uses proactive techniques to improve the physical condition of the City's homes and neighborhoods. The City may fund a portion of Code Enforcement activities, to address the removal of blight and improve housing conditions within the Redevelopment Project Areas. Agency general fund expenditures are contributed to this project during this planning period. Additional Project funding will be provided by the City General Fund and Community Development Block Grant Funds. infill Housing Program This program is designed to develop quality single family detached hoes on small tract (1-10 acres) infill parcels located Within targeted areas in San Jacinto. The Agency will encourage private development of infill housing within the Project Areas. No Agency expenditures are contributed to this project during this planning period. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 24 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Developer Proposed Projects This program facilitates the acquisition, rehabilitation, and management of large- scale multifamily projects by private developers. (Ancillary to the Rental Housing Rehabilitation Program). No Agency expenditures are contributed to this project during this planning period. Development of Second Units on Single Family Lots The City will continue to implement its Second Unit Ordinance, which allows for the construction of a second unit on lots with an existing residential unit, if it meets the conditions outlined in the Ordinance. No Agency expenditures are contributed to this project during this planning period . Density Bonus The City allows an increase in density of at least 25%, plus an additional incentive(s) or equivalent financial incentives, to housing developers who agree to construct at least: 20% of the units affordable to lower income households, 10% of the units to very low income households, or 50% of the units for senior citizen housing. No Agency expenditures are contributed to this project during this planning period. Project funding will be provided by the City General Fund. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance The City is in the process of developing an inclusionary housing ordinance that would require up to 15 percent of the total number of units constructed in all future housing projects larger than ten units or lots to be affordable to lower income households. The ordinance would require that lower income units be constructed in similar locations as market rate housing. No Agency expenditures are contributed to this project during this planning period. Project funding will be provided by the City General Fund. Fair Housing Fair Housing services are provided through Riverside County Economic Development Agency. No Agency expenditures are contributed to this project during this planning period. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 25 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Affordable Housing Geographic Distribution The City's housing rehabilitation efforts are targeted to the San Jacinto Redevelopment Project Area, a portion of which includes census tracts that are identified as having concentrations of low and moderate income families. These efforts are intended to eliminate slum and blight, encourage private investment into the community, and achieve a balanced community. The City program is also available city-wide, subject to funding availability. Section 33490 (a)(C)(iv) requires agencies to report the amounts of Housing Fund dollars utilizes to assist affordable units over the previous Implementation Plan Period (prior 5 year period). The following table identifies Housing Fund dollars expended on affordable housing projects since 1999. Please refer back to Table 3 for a break down of restricted units by income group and their term of restriction. s v Ffr I' %.z „� $ � � "i � 'ugt��.r .'�:r�'^/.'''J,�`�;�✓iYa'',.,-J'°�'.�i3-y3 yr 2v.J"f �r+iy:,.;_�r„�1�� r /. ky/ rx,.■i r %°.�✓i•:i�i.,�'Y'k'� --� / s/-."t ;jr . ,. PROJECT YEAR FUNDING Mortgage Assistance Program 1999/2000 $6,000 Habitat For Humanity 1999/2000 $8,114 Valley Foundation for the Developmentally Disabled 1999/2000 $26,403 Old 2ndStreet Sewer (Habitat) 2000/2001 $12,644 $74,524 Camino Los Banos Sewer 2001/2002 $15,980 Park Manor Property Acquisition 2000/2001 $614,958 Park Manor Demolition 2001/2002 $18,695 Salle Park Pool 2001/2002 $50,000 Habitat For Humanity — Sixth Street 2003/2004 $20,000 Housing Rehabilitation Program 2003/2004 Program Developed ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE 26 TEN -YEAR AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPLIANCE PLAN SAN JACINTO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY As this Housing Compliance Plan focuses on providing affordable housing for lower income households who are generally the most difficult segment of the community to house, it is consistent with the Draft Housing Element's goals of assisting in the development of a housing supply, which is affordable to all segments of the community and conserving, improving, and rehabilitating existing housing to meet the future needs of San Jacinto residents. Both this Housing Compliance Plan and the Housing Element of San Jacinto state there is a definite need to assure an adequate supply of housing for the lower income segments of the community. Like the Draft Housing Element, this Housing Compliance Plan emphasized the need to increase the supply of affordable housing units in the Project Area and citywide. The Housing Compliance Plan is also consistent with the Draft Housing Element regarding what revenue sources would be available to subsidize affordable housing projects. Both made it clear that all viable revenue sources need to be utilized to assist with alleviating affordable housing problems in the City. A major focal point of the goals, policies, and objectives of the Draft Housing Element is to provide housing for all economic segments of the City, especially lower income families. Because the major goal of this Housing Compliance Plan is also to provide affordable housing for these lower income households, and the proposed plans and programs for improving the supply of affordable housing in the City presented in this Housing Compliance Plan are similar to plans and policies of the Draft Housing Element. Since the Housing Element is currently in a draft form, it is anticipated the Housing Compliance Plan will be reviewed with the Final Housing Element and a determination of consistency made. ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP, INC. PAGE27 T'r AR MEETING ofthe REDE/ELOPMENT:ACEN of the ITV OF SAN, ;ACINTC 6 .2004, .9: San'Jacinto;Unif�ed �cr(o�l.Dis'#rict;Ba�i`d,,Roam, 045 South San Jacinta Avenue San Jacinto, California bsent. I\I4r IC HEARI Sari JacintoRedevelopment;Agency Five:Year Implementation Plan: - for°2004/2`005:through'20,08-2.009,:and Housing Cain"pliance, Plan I` , ::. Resolution ,No.; RDA-04-021 A: Resolution .adopting:a five;=year: implementation;plan;for the Redevelopment=Project; Areas 'ancl adopt ng the. Housing,Complience:Plan and snaking findings that the Agency` may; meet.its affor-daiirle,housing,r`equireme its:in the aggregate`r:amongst:all°:ofthe<Agericy's preject=;ar+eas prove an•d Adopf 1_'Mary Lanier, Community Development Consultant Mary�Lanier explainedhat: the,pianslproj:ects areforrthe upcor>ing;2004=,:: 2005 and also cover the�fiver.(5), year;requirement The 5=year' plan, a' . guide forth;e next 5° years .It'does':not_;allocate .any.funding. It Includes what was,done;during the previous funding3cycle ahe purchase af.the Virginia Lee:(Comrhithity Development Building; fagatle program, <: •.: development on Industrial Way. Projections at 2°Ja.uvill be increasing based on. the;. increased property values,'and:more.comrrierc allretall. development Agency: Mitre '-=Decembei'1 ,- Pao62 N1s Lanier noted.`that the commercial fa9ade program is to continue along xpressway<corridor;;the:-llllasterFlan: acid MasferrPlanning along Stete''Str,.eet.:She further::noted that housing,funds:can°t:he.used for infrastructure. According to City-Attor ey Jeff, Ballinger, ,the'20%. set aside of RDA money iis,,veryrestricted Chair"erson,'Bii ;cios.�commented that;a;lot oSri'ina�lci 'has lots- houses To the infill areas need:::ii frastructture. parti ularly=sidewalks rriorris to get their children to :school. The map defines these areas and it is designated at.;blight areas. Ms: Lanier.explairied the current' program'"fo Dousing improvements -used -to beavailableto make these type of program s happen. However. because of °cities;abusing tl ie'funding. it has been stopped foryinfrastructure. It''has to ins .used for aflordable housing and not-; infrastructure- DirectorAyres>=questioned:in:;the,Iniplemertatior.Plan how:'much money b'ein'g:.used;for:employee salaries;:. Ms=Lanier"responded fpage::12),ihat approximately S000,000 is used for overhead, which is pretty standard rriariy.rtitinicipal:DA pro,grarris.: He'suggested weaning that dawn ,over °' fete°nextfive-years. City.MariagerCosen#ini-rioted:that°he andFnance. Director Simon_are sensitive to that arna had made some`cuts..in that area:: the FY2004=2005:budget. Ms:.Lanier reviewed the 'housing compliance, component.. This is ;more =nf an"u. goalscum doent. She:noted the'City' is i equired to provide a certain mberof units°for Iow; and "moderately,low,;income residents. It is":called exclusionary. "°:'The. ordinance ,will .be:brought betore:the-City _Council::in January:°'=:She explained the 45 year. covet: nanfor.:single;familyhomes arid;' the55'yea_r Council MemberAyrescommented that'he,believes:4,5.years"Isunrealistic, and:that'is-What kills the program.Ms:Lanier concurred that it makes much more difficult to provide.this=housing. He suggested` the,, legislation:: be;:chan'ged` ° Ms:Lanier,commented`that she-was:not:surear yone would ; carry::the bill.,;,: ouricil Mem'ber,Ayres suggested :approaching=the ::' legislature as a:body.()ty Council as ,a: whole}:`arid:begin by writirig.a:., Ietter:;Options are needed,to bring:Iife,;tothe.program stated. Ms Lanier;;.,, Chairperson Buydos,recognized, Community: Director:Hults for being a Section Directorofthe 1,nland.:Empire. Planning; Association' and:. representative:on.the"American" Planning: Association State Board.-_ _` California;: Chapter.arirrdf=su.ggesteid he rriight best;know. +vhat the..; legislature;,. is-thiriking: iin.,tl ese terms.:;Director Halts rnd espoedihe hasppt heard any. discussion of,this: but.notedthe>Statexistalkirg abut taking over zoning. APA w.orkingto oppose it > airperson B> ljidc s suggested the Council %: RDA'.Board of Directors get < ' n: update;of: n'ew =legislation at one .meeting. every month ."She : `: rriphasized the`need to be out=front and to be heard early in:theprocess,: ° . Redevelopment Agency Minutes December 16. 2004 Page 3 of 4 Director Hults added that the Inland Empire Planning Directors will be farming -and communicating written opinion. Ms Lanier commented that an updated agreement for the housing rehabilitation loans will be coming forward shortly. Director Ayres noted there needed to be some advertisement and communication to the public so those that the fence sitters would be swayed, to participate. Ms Lanier noted she would have a press release to the newspapers after January 1 st Director Ritchie explained his previous experience with the program and volunteered to do whatever he could to communicate some of the impacts. Mary Lanier commented on the rental rehabilitation program: Those are easier to obtain the 55 year covenants. Other programs are out there. She then pointed out reduction in contract services costs; the 10 year projection for housing funds; reviewed the accomplishments — Habitat for Humanity — five (5) homes in San Jacinto - fees have been waived several times; the acquisition of Park Manor; and the housing rehabilitation program developed. Chairperson Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 9:36 p.m. No one was present to support or oppose the current programs; or make any comments. No written comments were received. Chairperson Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 9:37 p.m. M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve the San Jacinto Redevelopment Agency Five -Year Implementation Plan for 2004/2005 through 2008- 2009 and Housing Compliance Plan by adopting Resolution No. RDA 04-02 / A Resolution adopting a five-year implementation plan for the Redevelopment Project Areas; and adopting the Housing Compliance Plan and making findings that the Agency may meet its affordable housing requirements in the aggregate amongst all of the Agency's project area. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 4. CITY DEPARTMENTS None Redevelopment Agency Minutes December 16, 2004 Pape 4 of 4 5. CONSENT CALENDAR None 6. CHAIRPERSON / MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS None Chairperson Buydos recessed the RDA meeting at 9:38 p.m. and reopened into Closed Session at 10:16 p.m. 7. OPEN SESSION ANNOUNCEMENTS CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code 54956.8 Property: City APN s 435-020-032, 435-020-033, 435-020-029; and RDA 435-020-031 City / Agency Negotiator: City Manager Negotiating Parties: Trustee or nominee for Frey Living Trustee Under Negotiation: Price or terms of payment or both No reportable action 8. ADJOURNMENT With no further business coming before the Agency, Chairperson Buydos adjourned the meeting at 10:41 p.m. Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jacinto By Chris Carlson Buydos, Chairman ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, Agency Secretary MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF THE SAN JACINTO CI DECEMBER 16, 2004, 7:00 p.m. San Jacinto Unified School District. Board Room 2045 South San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto, CaIiforniE 1. ORGANIZATION 1.1 Call to Order Mayor Chris Carlson Buydos called the Regular Meeting of the San Jacinto City Council to order at 7:01 p.m. 1.2 Roll Call Present: Jim Ayres, Chris Carlson Buydos, Robert Ritchie, Ken Shaw, Dale Stubblefield Absent: None 1.3 Invocation Tim Leeper gave the invocation. 1.4 Pledge of Allegiance Council Member Ken Shaw led the Pledge of Allegiance. 1.5 Special Presentations 1.5.1 Business Spotlight of the Month / Economic Development Specialist Economic Development Specialist Randy Williams gave the business spotlight on Roman Tools. Specialist Williams explained several of the tools being made for this holiday season and how they came to be. John Romas invented the 'Handycut' in 1989. Initially, he was making 10,000 a year in his garage. In 1991 Mr. Roman noticed Rancho San Jacinto and decided San Jacinto was the place to grow his business. Sears and Matco began marketing his inventions under their logos. He has now expanded to two buildings to keep up with demand. The cleaver was -advertised on QVC with over 10,000 sold in 8 minutes. City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Page 2 of 23 Mayor Buydos presented a plaque Mr. Roman. He thanked the City Council for the recognition and agrees San Jacinto is a nice place to have a business. 1.5.2 Certificate of Achievement — Zephrum Q. Ellison. Troop 210, attaining Eagle Scout rank Mayor Buydos asked Zephrum his age. He responded that he is 14 years old. Mayor Buydos congratulated him at 14 having his own resume. She then read the Certificate of Excellence and presented it to Zephrum. He then spoke, sharing how he arrived at his Eagle Scout project: when the California Wild Fires were going last year the project began. He was informed there were three options at Lake Perris. One didn't interest him and the other too large a project for the time allotted, and therefore, selected the parking lot pavement at Sail Cove, Lake Perris Recreation Park. Lots of paperwork initially delayed the project but he was happy to bring it to completion. Zephrum thanked the City Council, he was honored. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: 2.0 Michel (Michel) Couto speaking for Maria P. Couto, 1435 S San Jacinto Avenue, Suite S-1, San Jacinto; Mr. Couto informed the Council he is speaking on behalf of his wife, who is the owner of the business. The request is to change the fee for the business. He believes that the $300iday to be extreme. Astrology consulting is allowed in nearby communities — Perris and Moreno Valley. Many of the consultations are free but donations are accepted with the average being $1-$5. Many phone calls are received and they are at no charge; counseling is provided over the phone. The main part of the business is retail - a religious articles' store. Those they cannot help they refer to other agencies. A background check will be willing provided. They anticipate moving to San Jacinto in 60 days and would like this resolved in that time frame. His handout showed business licenses the owner has held in other communities. 2.1 Riverside County Fair / Sponsorship opportunities / Terri Neuenswander Terri Neuenswander , representing Riverside County Fair, commented they are making a sponsorship request of $5,000. A letter was sent to the City Manager. Ms Neuenswander brought the Riverside County Fair Queen and her court. She commented that these girls attain the honor based on a scholarship process and have between 3.8 to 5.0 grade point averages in school. City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Page 3 of 23 The Riverside County Fair Queen and each attendant introduced themselves, gave their age and their academic ambitions. 3. PUBLIC HEARING 3.1 Public Hearing — Continued from 12/2/04 - At the conclusion of the Public Hearing and the certification of the election results for adding T31097 into CFD No. 2003-1 for Police and Fire Services aka Annexation No. 11 / Resolution No. 2656 / A resolution certifying the results of an election and adding property to Community Facilities District No. 2003- 01 / Annexation Noe 11 — T31097 aka Continental Residential Inc / Approve and Adopt / City Attorney & Special Tax Consultant City Attorney John Brown gave the Staff Report, noting that this iterr was continued from the December 2, 2004 meeting. Mayor Buydos reopened the Public Hearing at 7:21 p.m. No one was present to support or oppose the annexation. City Clerk Chouinard reporter no written comments had been received. Following the tabulation of the ballots City Clerk Chouinard reported and certified that a majority of voters are in support of the annexation and levying of the assessments. Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 7:21 p.m. M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) move to approve and adopt Resolution No. 2656 / A Resolution certifying the results of an election and adding property to Community Facilities District No. 2003-01 / Annexation No. 11 — T31097 aka Continental Residential Inc. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 3.2 Ordinance No. 04-22 / An Ordinance a mending the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee / Approve first reading and introduction of Ordinance No. 04-22 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto Amending the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Schedule of Ordinance No. 03-03 / Community Development Director City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Page 4 of 23 Community Development Director Tim Huits gave the staff report: The proposal is for an increase in the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The reasons sited were the increase in construction costs and the overall TUMF network costs. He reviewed the proposed changes: The background was prepared by the executive staff a WRCOG (Western Riverside Council of Government). Council Member Ayres commented that he is glad the City's representative voted no on the increase. The original agreement was that there was not to be an increase in two years. They've done this increase in 12 months. He thanked Vice Mayor Stubblefield for standing firm; noting once again theft hands are tied because of it being tied to Measure A funds. Mayor Buydos questioned lA in the staff report —what was expanded? Director Hults responded that there is modification to the network — a slight expansion but otherwise not known. Vice Mayor Stubblefield commented that from the engineer estimates the blending is what caused the shortfall; that money taken in could have been used differently and prevented the shortfall but they didn't do it. Ten ether cities voted against San Jacinto. Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 7:27 p.m. There was no one present to address the Council in support or opposition. With no one wishing to speak Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 7:27:30 p.m. Council Member Shaw expressed his displeasure about being under the gun again: The City could lose $2 million in Measure A funds between now and 2009. He noted that he believes this is not the end. Vice Mayor Stubblefield commented that this is the not the two (2)year review: There could be another increase June 2005. Because of the increase in commercial this could be incentive to drive businesses to other areas like San Bernardino. He offered to answer Council's questions. Council Member Ayres questioned how much has been collected so far? Vice Mayor Stubblefield responded that San Jacinto collected $1 million overall and another $1.3 million is projected next year on Sanderson alone. Council Member Ayres noted that it is projected to be $400 million. Vice Mayor Stubblefield noted they're close to it now for the whole build out. Mayor Buydos directed to Vice Mayor Stubblefield to keep up the fight and representing Council's concerns,noting the difficulty of the situation and the need for San Jacinto to bring in commercial entities to increase sale tax revenue and not to drive businesses away. City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Page 5 of 23 M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to first reading and introduction ofOrdnance No. 04-22 and by further motion read by title only: An Ordinance of the City Councii of the City of San Jacinto Amending the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Schedule of Ordinance No. 03-03 Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie; Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 3.3 At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, declaring the results of the assessment ballot tabulation, confirm assessment and ordering road, street and highway maintenance for certain property (commonly known aE Continental Residential Inc D R Horton T31097) into Assessment District No. 2003-1 / Resolution No. 2657 / A resolution declaring the results of the assessment ballot tabulation for the annexation of certain property to Assessment District No 2003-1 (AD 2003-1) pursabant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982; order maintenance work therein and confirming the diagram and assessment — Annexation No. 9 / Approve and Adopt / Special Tax Consultant and City Attorney City Attorney Jeff Ballinger gave the staff report. Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 7:32 p.m. No one was present to support or oppose the annexation. City Clerk Chouinard reported no written comments had been received. Following the tabulation of the ballots City Clerk Chouinard reported and certified that a majority of voters are in support of the annexation and levying of the assessments. Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 7:33 p.m. M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve and adopt Resolution No. 2657 declaring the results for the election, annexing said property into the AD 2003-1 and levying the assessments. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Page 6 of 23 3.4 Landscaping, Lighting., and Park District No. 2 (LLPD Na. 2} Annexation No. 27 (A.C. Ramona LLC T31037l-1/-2/-3) / City Attorney Resolution No. 2658 / A Resolution initiating proceedings for the Annexation of property into LLPD No 2 — annexation No. 27 / Approve and Adopt b) Resolution No. 2659 f A Resolution approving the Engineer's Report for Annexation No. 27 in to LLPD No. 2 / Approve and Adopt c) Resolution No. 2660 / A Resolution declaring intention to annex property into LLPD No. 2 — Annexation No. 27 / Approve and Adopt City Attorney Ballinger gave the staff report, noting while this is similar it different district than the earlier two: He then instructed Council with the procedures. There were no public comments. M/S/C (Ayres / Shaw) moved to approve and adopt Resolutions Nos, 2658, 2659 and 2660 as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None d) Public Hearing / At the conclusion of the public hearing if the City determines that a majority protest does not exist, by motion approve the certification of the election results for adding certain property into LLPD No 2 known as Annexation No. 27 / Approve and Adopt Resolution No. 2661 / A Resolution ordering annexation of territory into LLPD No. 2 and levying assessment - Annexation No. 27 — T31037/-1/-2/-3 Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 7:34 p.m. No one was present to support or oppose the annexation. City Clerk Chouinard reported no written comments had been received. Following the tabulation of the ballots City Clerk Chouinard reported and certified that a majority of voters are in support of the annexation and levying of the assessment(s). Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 7:34:30 p.m. M/S/C (Ayres / Shaw) moved to approve and adopt Resolution No. 2661 declaring the results for the election, annexing said property into the AD 2003-1 and levying the assessments. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Page 7 of 23 Absent: None Abstain: None 3.5 Sewer Rate Increase Urgency Ordinance No, 04-23 I Approve and Adopt Urgency Ordinance No. 04-23 and by further motion read by tltie only: An urgency ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Jacinto, California adjusting sewer rates to comply with an interagency sewage agreement with Eastern Municipal Water District Finance Director Finance Director Bernie Simon gave the staff report, noting that by virtue of EMWD (Eastern Municipal Water District) their ordinance that they adopted on November 22''' raised the rates and reviewed the amount of the increases. The agreement is to remit current fees and the new ones become effective Feb. 1, 2005. The reason for the urgency ordinance is that it becomes effective immediately and doesn't require a second reading of the ordinance. However, it does require 4/5 vote in favor. This is the second year the sewer rates have increased. Staff recommends approval. Mayor Buydos questioned if we had been notified timely so as not to have to do an urgency ordinance. Director Simon responded that they had not. Mayor Buydos opened the Public Hearing at 7:38 p.m. No one was present to support or oppose the proposed ordinance. City Clerk Chouinard reported no written comments had been received. Mayor Buydos closed the Public Hearing at 7:38:28 p.m. M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve and adopt Urgency Ordinance No. 04-23 as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Page 8 of 23 4. CITY DEPARTMENTS 4./ Local Appointments List (agency, committee and subcommittee appointments) aka IVIaddy List City Clerk City Clerk Dorothy Chouinard gave the staff report, evewng what had been done the previous year. Council Member Ritchie commented he would like to be on the Public Safety Committee. Mayor Buydos responded that it was determined to keep the two current members and reappoint them. Information and materials are available to all council members. There are Brown Act issues with three members serving. Council Member Ayres commented that he is the RTA chairman and would like to continue representing the City an RTA and RCTC. MIS/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve the following appointments. Vice Mayor Stubblefield commented on the time invested and accomplishment of Council Member Ayres to become RTA's chairman. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None Land Use and Development Committee (includes General Plan, Joint Committee with Planning Commissioners for development Issues) CDBG Review Recycling & Refuse San Jacinto Levees Economic Development (includes staff, covers VEDC) Historic Preservation Public Safety (includes Riverside County Disaster Committee; and Buydos, Shaw Ayres, Shaw Shaw, Ritchie Ayres, Buydos Shaw, Buydos Stubblefield, Shaw Ayres, Stubblefield City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Page 9 of 23 San Jacinto Disaster Response Committee) Chamber Liaison Transportation (includes Hwy 79, RCTC & RTA) Franchises Tribal Council Issues WRCOG Water (includes. Ground Water Association, EMWD Planning Task Force) Special Events (4th of July Parade, etc LLMD Library Ramona Pageant Ayres, City Manager, Police Chief, Finance Director, Huits Community Development Director, Battalion Fire Chief Shaw, City Manager backup RTA — Ayres, Stubblefield RCTC — Buydos, Ayres All others — Ayres. Buydos Ritchie / Stubblefield Buydos Ritchie Stubblefield / Ayres Buydos, Shaw Stubblefield, Ritchie Stubblefield, Shaw Ritchie Ritchie 4.2 Mobile Home Rent Control / Discuss and provide direction / City Manager City Manager Peter Cosentini gave the staff report. Some time ago, then Mayor Ayres met with people that were concerned about mobile home rent control. He asked the city attorney for his opinion based on BB&K's experience. City Manager Cosentini noted the staff report is for exploratory discussion. Council Member Ayres commented that this is an opportunity for San Jacinto to step into 21st century with rent,control for mobile home parks. He asked the Council to form an ad hoc committee, and to direct them to bring back a recommendation to Council within sixty (60) days; obtain input from different City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Page 10 of 23 areas and suggestions and provide some relief as partners to resolve the problem. He then volunteered to serve on the committee. Donna Matthews, Assistant Manager of Golden State Mobile Hcme Owners - Region 9, spoke, noting that it is the city's responsibility. A simple rent ordinance is doable to provide adherence to all mobile home laws. Ms Matthews commented it can be linked to the permit to have a mobile home business; Her organization is congenial to an annual CPI index increase. would be without fear of litigation; Mobile home renters need to see that these laws are enforced; Standards for requirements for use are set; occupancy protections must be maintained to get a business license; Profit should not be pocketed but directed to upkeep of the mobile home park; Expenses can be distributed based on net taxable income. She quoted the law that increases are provisions of tenancy and to state the increase is required in a rental memorandum agreement in the contract. The state legislature established these lavvs. She believes the city should assist with a simple ordinance that adopts these laws. Council Member Ayres noted City Attorney Ballinger was at the ast lastmeeting and would like him to continue to attend meetings. Hank Schmidst, Mountain Ave.; was at his meeting where this issue was discussed. Rates in the MH park he fives in are pretty moderate. Coaches are old, as they are in most of the MH parks. He believes the problem comes when big corporations buy one of these and raises rents known to be $100/mo for a long time. Rent control ordinances have been tested in court. Vacancy control causes problems: When a person goes to sell a coach the purchaser learns the rent may go way up and it often kills the sales and depreciates the value. He recommended vacancy control be included. Vice Mayor Stubblefield commented that during his campaign for election there were lots of comments about this issue. The owners have an unequal bargaining power and volunteered to assist on an ad hoc committee. Attorney Ballinger commented that there is a lot of case law: An ordinance can be drafted to protect the city. M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve an ad hoc committee with he and Vice Mayor Stubblefield to serve; and to meet with the mobile home parks. Mayor Buydos suggested having the agenda published. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Page 11 of 23 4.3 Bus Shelter Advertisement / Provide direction / City Manager City Manager Cosentini gave the staff report: The Council has heard this issue before. Since two council members have changed their opinion, he requested direction from the Council. Council Member Shaw commented he is one that changed his mind. He suggested putting together an option to share the funding with Chamber of Commerce and work together to put more bus stops in the city. Council Member Ayres proposed a iittie broader policy with more specific issues addressed and to keep it in-house. A requirernent would be for one main worker or two be assigned to various shelters. They would be required to do 6-8 hrs maintenance, trash removal, graffiti abatement, replacing of posters. The salary would be paid sales of advertisements. The other 32 hrs the employee(s) would be assigned to Barry Mulcock, Street Foreman. His passion about it is to keep a portion of the revenues doing to construction of new bus shelters. It has been done in other piaces. He noted it is usually a slow start slow. He didn't like the proposal with the Chamber. The city can have their asset grow. He further commented he doesn't want the money in the General Fund. It can be an additional source of revenue with 25-30% out of it pays for next shelter. Council Member Ayres informed the cost of a new shelter is $7,500 and some will need concrete and those will be more expensive. Mayor Buydos suggested more exploration of an internal policy. She noted midyear budget adjustments are coming soon. There won't be 40 hrs work now; The money will have to come from the General Fund for start up. Mayor Buydos then directed the City Manager meet with an administrative team and bring back with midyear budget. Since it will have budget implications, it needs research done for both the front end and back end. Council Member Ritchie commented he liked the idea of a full time employees that could be utilized by the street department, too. 4.4 Council Goal Process / Provide final additions for Goals' List / City Manager City Manager Cosentini gave the staff report, noting that he only received input from one council member. ie noted this would be the final call and the handout is complete where the one in the staff report is incomplete. City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Page 12 of 23 Mayor Buydos suggested that instead of breaking this into multiple meetings, the Council would be better served to have it all in one meeting. She suggested February — early evening. The Council then has time to set time aside. She further noted that with a new council member there are different issues than 18 months ago when this process was started. Deliberation time with staff is needed and suggested 3-4 hours: Staff has goals, as does the council. She commented she prefers it not be a weekend. Mayor Buydos reiterated an early evening meeting is preferable with the City Manager and Department Heads. The current system is antiquated — Tier I and Tier The list is started and now needs better organization and better prioritization Vice Mayor Stubblefield suggested starting before the regular Council meetings over a couple meetings. He might be ok with getting date set in February. City Manager Cosentini responded he understood and had enough direction to get started. 4.5 Federal Priority and Legislative Agenda i Provide final additions for Legislative Agenda 2005 City Manager Mayor Buydos commented representatives from the City have been going back to Washington DC and have been quite successful. For the Federal Omnibus Bill she would like the Council's priorities sanctioned: The San Jacinto Levee Project, Hwy 79, Estudillo Mansion; Department of Justice — the PAL building; Grant for library services for the museum — the museum has to be up and running to qualify; Regional Forestry Grant also has funds available for the Estudillo Mansion; Federal EDA priority project is Sanderson and Ramona; There are program technical assistance grants to do the major master planning for economic planning including the development planning to avoid financial overburden — freeway to freeway connector. It brings uniformity for staff. Council Member Ayres commented that in item #4 that staffing is critical. He would like to have booklets to distribute on the levee. He noted he will be going to Washington DC, representing RTA; Mayor Buydos will be going with the Valley Group. It is important to make sure letters of support are compete. Mayor Buydos commented that with the complete packages the endorsements of the other related groups has to be incorporated. One that is not incorporated in these issues -is the tribal lands but needs to be put on the radar screen. City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Pape 13 of 23 M/S/C (Ayres Shawl moved to approve terns 1-7 as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 4.6 Request for Proposals for the Development of a Park Master Plan / Review and direct staff City Manager and Community Development Director City Manager Cosentini introduce Community Development Director Tim Hults who has been working on this along with the consultants. Director Hults introduced Mary Lanier, as she prepared the staff report and the RFF for the Park Master Plan for the next 10-20 years. Included are the river levee, passive park land, specific disc for other areas. It covers a scope of what the Council wants to get a broad base of firms to bid on it. Other subjects for discussion included: 1) a regional park facility 2) other uses for the river levee — passive parks — 3) recommend no park credits 4) how will future park maintenance be paid 5) input from Sam Goepp from Valley Wide to respond how different from what Valley Wide provides Ms Lanier responded to questions regarding typed of improvements on existing parks; the linkage between them; joint use of facilities, i.e. school district, an aquatic center. They had all been included except a shared aquatic center. Mayor Buydos suggest that the City only has one pool and with out the high school having one that perhaps something in conjunction with another entity like Diamond Valley Lakes aquatic center would be appropriate. Council Member Ayres commented that aquatic center are expensive to operate and costly to maintain. Banning is building one now, which is a $4 million project with a $200,000 annual budget to maintain. He knows Mr. Goepp doesn't like pocket parks. Pocket parks are costly to maintain. Mr. Goepp explained the issue with small pocket parks and lots of children in the new tracts. He continued that Valley Wide will only take five acre minimum. They recently upgraded their standards. Developers can be conditioned and given the book of the standards. He suggested with the mini City Council Minutes December 16. 2004 Page 14 of 23 and pocket parks developers don't get credit for park fees. He will research what other communities have done and report back. Council Member Ayres questioned how Valley Wide budgets for parks. Mr. Goepp responded that their standards for parks are known costs and for whichever option is selected. The LLMD (special districts) are a better vehicle for funding maintenance, as it levels paying field. Cost is about $8,000 per acre. He concurred pools are expensive, as Hemet's West Valley High School is budgeting $350,000/yr. Temecula gave theirs to the school district and then have use for a couple of months. Nuisance water builds up in retention basins and the larger they are the shallower they need to be. It's important to keep nuisance water out or it becomes a bog. Council Member Ayres noted that school facilities are dormant on weekends — ball and soccer fields, etc are paid for by the taxpayers. The scion: district needs to be included in the discussions. Mr. Goepp commented that the more the facilities are used the less the less the vandalism. City Manager Cosentini asked about what the Council wants the developer to contribute: Currently it is $1,000/ 5 acre, does Council want it raised? He also, question where is Valley Wide's responsibility in all this? Where does the City's begin? Mayor Buydos she would like the Park Master Plan to analyze both - lots of policy comes into play. It has to be done with school district involved. She would welcome Valley Wide to do the Park Master Plan. Valley Wide needs to be part of it and so does our Public Works Department. Through progressive design - how trails are designed and connected problems could be resolved. She would like to see Valley Wide take it on and any consultants they would want to partner with them so it would be completed expeditiously. Mayor Buydos reiterated that they don't need to recreate the wheel but to consolidate. Vice Mayor Stubblefield commented that Valley Wide has 30 years experience and should be utilized. There may be times to accept less than 5 acres and that should be looked at, too; He noted he recognizes staff is taxed and in-house doesn't seem possible. Mayor Buydos commented Ray Sanchez (in-house) has been inventorying the parks. She suggested mandating bringing in Valley Wide as part of consulting team. Mr. Goepp suggested $1000/3 acre. Hemet's is $1000/5 acre. City Manager Cosentini noted the law provides for it to be set higher if a higher one exists: City Council Minutes December 16, 2004- Page 15 of 23 Mayor Buydos suggested giving partial 5 acre/$1000 and using the 6- 7acrel$1000 for the recreational standards. Director Hults commented on the Subdivision Map Act. Quimby legislation applies to all or to expand existing to 7.5 acrel $1000. He questioned who knows anyone that uses 7.5? While the recommendation ideally is 10/$1000, which is a combination that combines all types, the Quimby applies to the subdivision act, as Director Hults further defined how the ratio works. Director Hults commented there is no credit for park fees if park is flood control space. Those developers using basins will have to pay. However, a consideration to consider would be to allow credit for the cost of a basketball court or tot lot. He reminded Council again fiscal imprcvements are for subdivisions only. Mayor Buydos commented that she is ok with the 5/$1000, as long as it has to be that or more. Council Member Ayres commented he doesn't want it split into, small scattered parks. Mr. Goepp commented that there is a need to consider what is being built in the bigger picture so that adjustments can be made on the edges of subdivisions. And it needs to be funded. Director Hults commented that if Council sticks with the 5/100C then the things that don't apply have to be exempted out. Mayor Buydos stated that anything that can't be developed or sloping ground is not space to be considered. Ms Lanier responded to how the discussion fit the proposed RFP. M/S/C (Buydos / Shaw) moved to press the forward the discussion further regarding the standard acreage and fees and to include input from Valley Wide and staff. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5. CONSENT CALENDAR City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Page 16 of 23 5.1 Warrants at 12!116/04 / Approve / Finance Director 5.2 November 18, 2004 Rea uiar Minutes / Approve / City Clerk 5.3 December 2, 2004 Regular Minutes / Approve / City Clerk 5.4 Contract with Riverside County for Information Technology Services r Approve and Authorize City Manager to execute said contract 1 Finance Director 5.5 Final Tract Maps T31037-1 and T31037-2 !Alexander Communities / Approve and Authorize City Manager to execute the Subdivision Agreement / City Engineer 5.6 Phase II Archaeological Study / Authorization to proceed - potentially significant historical site at the Francisco Estudillo Heritage Park and appropriation for the use of an additional $30,000 of Park Development Funds / Approve 1 Redevelopment Operations Manager 5.7 Additional staff for Utility Billing Department FY 2004-05 r Approve and Appropriate $2Ca,000 from Utility Enterprise Funds ($14,000 Water,. $4,000 Solid Waste, $2,000 Sewer) / Finance Director 5.8 Organizational Training / Authorize Persongenics training for City Manager / City Manager 5.9 Special Events / Approve and Appropriate $5,000 for Special Events / City Manager 5.10 Warrants at 12/16/04 / Approve / Finance Director Items pulled 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, 5.6, 5.7, 5.8. M/S1C (Ayres / Buydos) moved to approve the balance of the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.4 Contract with Riverside County for Information Technology Services 1 Approve and Authorize City Manager to execute said contract / Finance City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Facie 17 of 23 Director Mayor Buydos asked Finance Director Simon to respond. Mayor Buydos commented that the posting of agendas is a problem, It appears that having WRCOG host that they are operating off an antiquated arrangement. Finance Director Simon commented that we are free to stay with WRCOG but we don't have the capability with them to be able to do any direct changes or updates. Vice Mayor Stubblefield commented that WRCOG pays the "www" fee. We should be able to have our own and get the "fttp" directly. M/S/C (Buydos / Stubblefield) moved to approve as presented and to get Planning Commission and City Council agendas on the web. Moon carried 5/C, Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.6 Phase II Archaeological Study / Authorization to proceed - potentially significant historical site at the Francisco Estudillo Heritage Park and appropriation for the use of an additional $30,000 of Park Development Funds / Approve / Redevelopment Operations Manager Vice Mayor Stubblefield commented the process has been slowed by using park development funds. He questioned how much this was drawing out the process and if the funding is coming out of the right fund. Mayor Buydos noted they have used it before for the Estudillo Mansion but this is the museum that will be located on the Mansion's grounds. Finance Director Simon responded that as of 6/30/04 the amount forecasted - $438,000 — approximately $169,000 has been spent in this budget year and this adds an additional $30,000 to that. Vice Mayor Stubblefield questioned how much has been spent on Mistletoe Park, sidewalks, park restrooms, and fences. Council Member Ayres commented that there is $268,000 start park funds available, too. They know the cost is more than $260,000, as there is more work to do. He supports this and believes it will be a future city department. Redevelopment Agency Manager commented this replaces CDBG transfer funds. Council Member Ritchie commented that it is prudent to look for another funding resource to actually do this. Director Hults responded that they did consult with number of archeologists that have to do the hand work. It is City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Page 18 of 23 highly specialized with a contractor finding the discovery that knows the protocol. He stated he is no suggesting to go out to bid, as that would delay the project funner. M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve Phase II Archaeological Study with Authorization to proceed at the Francisco Estudillo Heritage Park and appropriation for the use of an additional $30,000 of Park Development Funds. Following a question, Director Hults responded that this is necessary to be able to proceed. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.7 Additional staff for Utility Billing Department FY 2004-05 1 Approve and Appropriate $20,000 from Utility Enter!trise Funds ($14,000 Water, $4,000 Solid Waste, $2.000 Sewer) / Finance Director Council Member Ritchie questioned where would the person be located. Director Simon responded that they would make room where the file cabinets are located next to Shirley Cabos. City Manager Cosentini commented that Finance Department is looking into the not too distance future for a modular for the Finance Department based on the overcrowding. City Manager further explained that a temporary employee fills the need now, then at mid- year budget he will make recommendation for a FTE. M/S/C (Ayres / Stubblefield) moved to approve and appropriated $20,000 from the Utility Enterprise Funds as presented. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 5.8 Organizational Training / Authorize Persongenics training for City Manager / City Manager City Manager Cosentini commented that this is teambuilding training and will be utilized for the City's staff. It is a discipline used by the United States Supreme Court. He can do the initial training for $5,000 instead of $20,000 complete package. - Council Member Ayres questioned why the City Manager would need to go through this process. City Manager Cosentini responded that it is to train him City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Page 19 of 23 to be a trainer to teach the discipline. Council Member Ayres stated he was not in favor of this expenditure, as he doesn't see it as a benefit. He commented further that he doesn't think it is a priority for him because he believes the City Manager should already have those skills. City Manager Cosentini responded that he would be able to brief and train staff. Mayor Buydos commented it is about the timing, as anything. City Manager Cosentini commented he is wiling to brief Council Member Ayres and Vice Mayor Stubblefield if they would like to know more; it is a way to stay current with what the new trends are and how it fits into municipal govern ment. By unanimous consensus item 5.8 was continued. Mayor Buydos recessed the Regular Meeting at 9:10 p.m. to convene the Redevelopment Agency meeting. She then reconvened the Council's Regular meeting at 9:35 p.m. 6. MAYOR / COUNCIL MEMBER REPORTS / DISCUSSIONS 6.1 Valley Re -Start Paid for Ride Program — Homeless Committee / City Manager and Council Member Shaw / Appropriation request of $2,000 donation to Valley Re -Start for administration to Pay for a Ride Program in San Jacinto City Manager Cosentini and Council Member Ken Shaw gave the staff report: City Manager Cosentini introduced the Council Member Shaw as the expert in this area. Council Member Shaw basically reviewed meetings they have been attending. The situation right now is no one knows what to do to benefit the homeless. Valley Re -Start has stepped up to the plate to reduce the number of clients per City of Hemet's request. When they were servicing 80-90 clients, San Jacinto had about 20% of those. In essence, if part of the problem then need to be part of the solution. Council Member Shaw commented that Valley Restart is willing to reduce servicing people from the valley but because of HUD and other funding sources they have to take others from outside Hemet and San Jacinto. Valley Restart is in need of administrative funding. Recently Hemet gave $10,000 out of their General Fund. He reviewed the time allowed for clients to stay in their program. One solution is with some funding of bus money they could rotate these clients back to where they want to be. It is partly good will and partly taking care of San Jacinto clients. When asked how the program is run, he responded that the transportation provided is mainly bus passes. Hemet donated $2,000 for transportation and this money is not commingled. City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Page 20 of 23 Mayor Buydos question if this was a new program. Council Member Shaw responded that it is a nevv idea and it doesn't say how many people it will help. Again, it is a good will gesture. It's the Council's decision to do less or whatever they choose. Mayor Buydos acknowledged the need and suggested instead of $2,000 maybe $500; and expressed strongly the need for more information back. The 20% from San Jacinto are not people that are getting bused out. The Council needs to know the demographics before more money is released. Council Member Shaw commented he believes that eventually there will be a regional home. Council Member Ayres questioned where the money wilt come from. Council Member Shaw responded it would have to be out of the General Fund. Council Member Ayres noted RTA provides bus transportation but this is outside of the scope of RTA services. He supports Mayor's recommendations and would like to see the short and long term goals. MISIC (Buydos / Shaw) moved to approve and appropriate a $500 bus allocation to Valley Restart to be taken from the General Fund with monitoring of the cliental to provide demographic feedback. Motion carried 5/0. Council Member Ayres noted the homeless are where the weather is mild and therefore that is where the benefits should also be. He is concerned about the clients that have learned to manipulate the system. Maybe the Council can be more support of the program with more information. Council Member Shaw agreed better records are needed. There is a waiting list to get into the shelter: There is not a lack of clients. Motion carried 5/0. Ayes: Ayres, Ritchie, Shaw, Stubblefield, Buydos Nays: None Absent: None Abstain: None 6.2 Mayor and Council Member Committee and Subcommittee Agendas / Receive and File / City Clerk No action required Council Member Reports: City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Page 21 of 23 Council Member Ritchie reported he attended the 100 year anniversary of a local. He noted he sent condolences Dr. Goletta's Council Member Shaw reported he attended the Kiwanis' event, which honored Betty and Ted Smith from San Jacinto with an achievement award, among other items. Council Member Ayres reported he had a 90 minute meeting with Randal Lewis. The discussion centered on six 6 targets to be built in the Inland Empire. His company is interested in Sanderson and Ramona. He is also interested in a joint use library. He suggested a tour with the librarian and to open discussion of a joint use facility. Vice Mayor Stubblefield reported he attended the WRCOG meeting. He noted they will be dark in January. There is a Public Safety Meeting next week. Also, the police department did a safety check ic emphasize zero tolerance for DUI. He noted he is looking forward to seeing the numbers of DUIs from the 691 that went through the designated stops. He noted he would like to see Andre Landscaping with a report back: He suggested quarterly. Mayor Buydos suggested a work session with the LLMD Sub- committee, as the level of detail has changed. Mayor Buydos reported that she had done a presentations for the Action Group, retiring EMWD members; attended the groundbreaking of the new emergency room. She noted copies of information on RCTC meeting regarding the Ramona Expressway and the Cajalco corridor. She commented on the regulatory agencies — interactions with partnership might be beneficial with Region 8 with San Jacinto highlighted with work done on Hwy 79. She prefers a proactive approach. Mayor Buydos noted that this is the last meeting of year and will be absent the month of January. She wished everyone happy holidays. Mayor Buydos recessed the Regular Meeting at 10:06 p.m. and reconvened in Closed Session at 10:16 p.m. 7. CLOSED SESSION 7.1 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designated representatives: Roger Crawford & Peter Cosentini Employee Organization: Service Employees International Union City Council Minutes December 16, 2004 Page 22 of 23 No reportable action. 7.2 CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS Agency designate representative.s: '''ogerr Crawford & Peter Coserptirti Employee Organization: Management AssocIatiort No reportable action. 7.3 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 Property: APNs 435-020-031, 032, 033 and a portion of 029 Agency negotiator: Peter A. Cosentini, City Manager Negotiating parties: Frey Living Trust 1 Tierra West Commercial Realty Under negotiation: Price and Terms No reportable action. 9. ADJOURNMENT With no further business before the Council, Mayor Buydos adjourned the meeting at 11:10 p.m. ATTEST: Dorothy L. Chouinard, City Clerk City of San Jacinto By Chris Carlson Buydos, Mayor Approved as read