HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Agenda Packets - Regular Meeting 6/3/2010REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#: b SUBJECT: I-AAf7 C 4cc Deivi //Pir l°oirk,
DATE: 6 (3 //0
IN FAVOR: d NEUTRAL: 0 IN OPPOSITION: 0
Name: 041m S 3. r/4/1/6- 2-
Representing: 'i rT it & 3
Address: Q s . /{ y `S
City: \S / �J 19 C A/7"O.
Telephone No: /9 S Y� G77 f
Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you
are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise.
Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more
than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council.
When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time.
Please make your presentation from the microphone.
HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE
START OF THE MEETING.
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#:i ».9 SUBJECT:
DATE: (-3 - A 0 1 0
IN FAVOR: i?l k_f �N'EUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: ❑
4.4. Gi , 4 (fey/
Name:
Representing: �e�' i
Address: / f' L' iL t F f ib T !�
City: Jett,- ?(_t.Z 1ti) Q Telephone No: 1 s "f 1/12)-S
Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you
are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise.
Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more
than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council.
When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time.
Please make your presentation from the microphone.
HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE
START OF THE MEETING.
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMSUBJECT: VIA
DATE: G -3
IN FAVOR: NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: 0
Name: P47( f # W4)
Representing: t
Address:/8 / �,/1 /V / �1
City: r(� / Telephone No:
Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you
are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise.
Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more
than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council.
When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time.
Please make your presentation from the microphone.
HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE
START OF THE MEETING.
Address:
c �
City: •
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY COU CI -AGENDAITEM#: SUBJECT: S) 3 to
DATE:
IN �F ►' NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: ❑
Name: \
Representing:
0041T-
Telephone No: t v )--
Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you
are riot required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise.
Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more
than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council.
When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time.
Please make your presentation from the microphone.
HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE
START OF THE MEETING.
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#: 0
DATE: 6 I3 1 I 3
IN FAVOR: ❑
Name: A /f7vt50
Representing: it.1 y S e ( i
Address: l ( So(t (,,,ct 5+
City: Jckc ti C fl
SUBJECT: J-c� lt�1-c' fc-k-kK
II
Cr -y Ccovice( !S. C. +y en5evt
NEUTRAL:
❑ IN OPPOSITION: ❑
Telephone No: 057) 17- c( c(3 3
Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you
are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise.
Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more
than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council.
When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time.
Please make your presentation from the microphone.
HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE
START OF THE MEETING.
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM#
DATE: r e I t0
IN FAVOR:
Name: U qz_
Representing ekt. ,
Address: C
City:
REQUEST TO SP AK.
:2— SUBJECT:
tj
NEUTRAL: ❑ IN OPPOSITION: ❑
Telephone No:
Individual speakers wishing to address an agenda item are requested to complete this card. Although you
are not required to complete this card, the information will assist the City in addressing the issue(s) you raise.
Individual speakers are limited to three minutes for their presentation. Organized presentations with more
than one speaker are limited to 15 minutes, at the discretion of the Mayor and Council.
When speaking, be brief, stay on the subject. The Mayor will call you to speak at the appropriate time.
Please make your presentation from the microphone.
HAND SPEAKER SLIPS TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE
START OF THE MEETING.
Rick Miller
Subject:
Attachments:
FW: City council item 3A.4 - Petition for speed humps on Van Fleet Dr.
Scan001.pdf
Importance: High
Honorable Mayor and Members of Council,
In regards to the item mentioned above, I was given a letter today by a resident on Van Fleet Dr. as he saw the
agenda and wanted to request that this item be pulled from the agenda. He wanted to know if you would pull this and
have it addressed at the July 1, 2010 Regular City Council Meeting. He would like it postponed to July 1n so that he can
have time to inform the residents so that they may appear before the council, and 2 days is not enough time for him to
inform everyone. I informed him that I would let you know and that it is the council's decision.
Attachments:
Letter dated 4/19/2010 — I do not believe that the letter was included in your agenda packets.
Letter dated 6/1/2010
Map of area where speed humps are requested — provided by City Engineer Habib Motlagh
Rick Miller
City Clerk
nt(ttvtu
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
BY
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: RESIDENTS OF VAN FLEET DRIVE IN SAN JACINTO
JUN 0 12010
SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE
REQUEST TO INSTALL SPEED BUMPS ON VAN FLEET DRIVE,
EXTENDING FROM WASHINGTON AVENUE TO
COMMONWEALTH AVENUE
DATE: JUNE 1, 2010
BACKGROUND:
On April 19, 2010, a petition along with a detailed memo was hand -delivered to David Ross,
Assistant City Engineer to begin the process of requesting installation of speed bumps along
Van Fleet Drive. Upon reviewing the agenda for the 6/3/10 City Council Meeting, we have
noted, with dismay, that part of the documentation submitted has not been included for the
Council's review on the June 3, 2010 meeting. The purpose of this memo is as follows:
1. We request that the original memo and this memo be included with the documents
so that the Council and Honorable Mayor may be fully informed as to the details of
the reason for the request for speed bumps on Van Fleet Merely showing the
Petition with 100% of residents signatures does not do justice to the problem at
hand with the traffic situation on this residential street
2. We wish to dispute the Staff's findings that Van Fleet is classified as a "Collector
Street", which would disqualify Van Fleet from meeting criteria for installing speed
bumps as "only local residential streets are eligible".
SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
To address the main issue of Van Fleet being a "Collector Street":
1. According to Figure C-1, Roadway Cross Sections of the San Jacinto General Plan,
to be classified as a "Collector Street", the minimum width from curb -to -curb must
be at least 44 feet, and minimum sidewalk width is 6 feet (copy of this page
attached). The measurements taken in front of 1905 Van Fleet Drive show the street
width to be 39 feet, 11 inches, and the sidewalk width to be 5 feet, 6 inches. At 1866
Van Fleet, the North end of the street, the street width is 39 feet, 9 inches; at 1953
Van Fleet to the South, the street width is 39 feet, 11 inches. We did not find any
part of the sidewalk that measured greater than 5 feet, 6 inches. Therefore,
according to the City's criteria, Van Fleet Drive does not qualify as a "Collector
Street" as it is too narrow both in curb -to -curb measurement and in sidewalk
measurement In addition, we took the time to obtain measurements from the
streets mentioned in City Staff's comments. We found that Meridian Avenue and
Arroyo Viejo Drive could, indeed, be classified as "Collector Streets" as both
measure 44 feet from curb -to -curb. The memo appears to be in error when it
mentions Villines Street, as no measurement taken on that street exceeded a 40 foot
curb -to -curb width.
2. A copy of the Roadway System Map taken from the San Jacinto General Plan
(designated as Figure C-2, and also included as part of this memo) also shows the
designation of "Collector Streets" in this subdivision, and Van Fleet is NOT
designated as such. Washington Street is; Commonwealth Avenue is; Park Avenue
is; Meridian Avenue is; but our residential street is NOT A "COLLECTOR
STREET". It is interesting to note that this approved General Plan also does not
show Villines, Las Rosas, or Arroyo Viejo as "Collector Streets" even though two of
these streets meet the 44 feet curb -to -curb width requirement.
3. We also measured the streets in the immediate community that DO have speed
bumps installed, and found those streets to be of the same width as is Van Fleet
Drive. A table is attached giving specific locations and measurements for your
review. It is interesting to note that on one street, Reinhart Street, there was a speed
bump that measured 44 feet, 7 inches on one side of the bump, and 47 feet, 4 inches
on the opposite side of the bump. That part of the street in comparison to Van
Fleet is much wider, even wider than the designated "Collector Street" General Plan
measurements.
Additionally, information from the Land Use Map from the San Jacinto General Plan shows
the entire area surrounding Van Fleet Drive to be "LDR" - LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL". Emphasis on being residential, with a substantial amount of foot traffic
generated from the middle school at the junction of Commonwealth and Van Fleet, where
our street ends, as well as from the bike path that intersects in the middle portion of Van
Fleet, and where are no designated cross -walks or cautions are available.
Van Fleet Drive is not a thoroughfare street, and differs from Meridian, Villines, Arroyo
Viejo, Beringer, and Las Rosas, as it is the shortest street of those previously mentioned;
refer to the table and you will see that the entire street is 2/10t of a mile in length. All other
streets mentioned are greater in length. Interestingly enough, Van Fleet Drive extends only
from Washington to Commonwealth. All the other streets (except Beringer) extend from
Park Hill to Esplanade and all of them are greater in length.
Van Fleet the only street of those mentioned above that leads directly to a school; it is the
only street of those previously mentioned that is entirely residentially developed on both
sides of the street Part of Villines has a park and regardless of how it is classified should
be allowed to have speed bumps for safety of children and bicyclists. The north side of
Villines above Esplanade is not developed on one side and faces empty land; there are only 9
houses along that stretch of road. Arroyo Viejo has no houses facing the street at all on the
South side of the street for the entire length of the street stretching from Esplanade to
Washington.
Simply installing more advisory signs is not going to solve the problem: We already have
"Children At Play Signs" and parents have even purchased their own "Slow - Children at
Play" signs and put them out in front of their homes - people have historically ignored the
signs and don't obey the 25 mph speed limit. The signs on this street also have a habit of
2
periodically "disappearing"; over time the City will spend more time, money and effort
replacing those signs than they would installing the speed bumps. Because Van Fleet is a
residential street, it is often not routinely patrolled by law enforcement to enforce the 25
mph speed limits. Placing patrols here during the hours the school traffic radically increases
in the morning and afternoon on a consistent schedule to alleviate that problem would not
be cost efficient for the City.
Therefore, the only alternative to solving this problem, increasing the safety of the residents
and the children that live on the street, and having traffic obey the appropriate speed limit, is
the installation of speed bumps. Please reconsider the Staff's Recommendation and approve
the Alternative: Direct Staff to proceed with the installation of speed bump construction.
Attachments: Original Memo dated 04/19/2010
Figure C-1, Roadway Cross Section Specifications from San Jacinto General
Plan
Figure 2-C, Roadway System, San Jacinto General Plan
Table of Speed Bump Locations and Street Width Measurements
Legend and Close Up Portion of Residential Area from San Jacinto General
Plan
3
RECEIVED
CITY OF SAN JACINTO
JUN 012010
iT`� CC R�
BY_
TO: CITY OF SAN JACINTO: CITY ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: PATRICK GEIER & RESIDENTS LIVING ON VAN FLEET DRIVE IN
SAN JACINTO
SUBJECT: REQUEST TO INSTALL SPEED BUMPS ON VAN FLEET DRIVE,
EXTENDING FROM WASHINGTON AVENUE TO
COMMONWEALTH AVENUE
DATE: APRIL 19, 2010
Over the past several years, traffic traveling down Van Fleet Drive has become much heavier
and drivers are substantially less respectful of the 25 mile per hour speed limit posted on the
street This has created dangerous conditions in many forms:
• Children coming to and from school, as well as those that reside in the area can no
longer safely cross the street due to excessive speeding by drivers, many times over
45 miles per hour.
• Children and families riding bicycles on the bike path and along Van Fleet Drive
have had numerous near -misses with cars ignoring the right-of-way for pedestrians
crossing the path from one side of Van Fleet Drive to the other, mainly due to
curves in the street and excessive speeds.
• Homeowners trying either to back out or turn into their residence driveways are
faced with speeding cars that will not yield the right of way but instead honk, cross
over a double -yellow line and otherwise ignore the basic courtesy of waiting for cars
to exit and enter homes.
• An excessive amount of parents that do not live in this area yet bring their children
to school by car ignore posted speeds as well as block traffic along Van Fleet by
parking on both sides of Van Fleet adjacent to Commonweath Avenue, creating a
very narrow passageway to turn onto and off of the street.
A petition requesting speed bumps be installed on Van Fleet Drive from Washington
Avenue to Commonwealth Avenue has been circulated to the residents of the 20 homes that
line Van Fleet Drive. Fourteen homeowner signatures comprising 82% of the homeowners
(there are 3 vacant houses on the street) have been collected that agree having speed humps
installed will help curb the excessive speed problem. It may also help to reduce the amount
of traffic on this street by people who use it to cut through the neighborhood from Park Hill
to Esplanade instead of traveling along wider streets such as Hewitt. The following criteria
have been met
April 19, 2010
Page 2
Request for Installation of Speed Bumps on Van Fleet Drive
1. Over 51% of the homeowners on Van Fleet Drive are in favor of this request.
2. There is a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour.
3. The curb -to -curb width of the street is less than 40 feet.
4. Van Fleet Drive is not a bus transit route.
5. The street's grade does not exceed 5%
The conditions along Van Fleet Drive are highly unsafe. Homeowners here are extremely
tired not only of speeders, but also of cars playing excessively loud music, people throwing
trash out of cars, an inordinate amount of parents ignoring safe parking practices, and cars
using a residential street as a through -fare to avoid traffic signals on larger streets.
Please help us return this neighborhood to the safe, quiet, enjoyable place it used to be by
approving our request and installing the speed bumps as soon as possible. Many of the
homeowners on this street have lived here over 10 years and wish to see what was one of
San Jacinto's first "master planned communities" return to the pleasant neighborhood it was
intended to be.
2
wI+
M
m
CITY OFESAN EACINTO
JUN 0 1 2010
BY fe TY LEAK
Ir
.r--- u• T _ rT rT—ir.
0.02
aaEM11111ADRI .®.x
r it 14 I r +� r
x I
II_EI®rKem 01111111.111111 1• s I O I
r-rs I 'r—It'r--Ir— TT r'r—cuss
IrTI"T--it ir�r-�-r ss'j
Ise
v
lama mass mwssnssw MUM • s unsj
M'M
,r
Saws VhanoaafoSt2.ai
Ism
r
v
N.CYDsfitiMS MON
MNIANIKWEI
hOs
M � aeumoPANIC .®ur
lir -'
�y�tyg, t
Ir `Y—I—Ir
Son Jacinto General Plan
EIMMWEI
Ma IW ..IIr�� an
��r•--±�IY�IrT rIr�
soy it
.r
r'`T��r
n•
tMIaWTMaaa.f fr4-1101110[MOMS=
aINM01ML0a .IDlaiwaL,T T
r Ii. II:7
•Pscr m siernfia1ID.YnOMMOMNQT•
YISOSIIVESSORS Ma %JW
Figure C-1
Roadway Cross Sections
C-14 January 2006
RAMC/MR/HWY.
LEGEND:
O
a
- CITY BOUNDARY
FREEWAY
▪ LIMITED ACCESS CONVENTIONAL HIGHWAY
(S OR B LANES)
- URBAN ARTERIAL
- ARTERIAL
- MAJOR
SECONDARY
- COLLECTOR
ROADWAY OUTSIDE CITY SPHERE
- OVER/UNDER CROSSING
=AND COUNTY PARKWAY ALTERNATIVE 1
=ANO COUNTY PARKWAY ALTERNATIVES
1-- u•V •1.w.Y04YY.r.Np1
Son Jacinto General Phn
T
aeon
LAMB N, RO.
z
SONORA
/RD'
WARRINGTON AV
16
_I
C•19
Figure C-2
Roadway System
January 2006
R/W
90'
MIN. 34'
----11' 10' 12' 12=
CURB 2%
PAINTED MEDI
56'
R/W
MIN.
12' 10' 6' 11'
2% I CURB 5� DEWA�K
INDUSTRIAL COR
¶ART WIDTH STREET SECTION FOR AN INTERIOR
COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL STREET
78'
R/W
44'
34, 3' PART W TH
MlN. fl 1R/W LIN MIN.
11' 10' 12' 12' 10' 6' 11'
SIDEW LK I IDEW LK
CURB 2% 2% CURB
COLLECTOR
*PART WIDTH STREET SECTION FOR ALL COLLECTOR STREET -
34' IMPROVEMENTS ON 48' R/W
Speed Bump Locations and Street Width Measurements
Street Location of Speed Bump
Street Width Measurement at this Location
1905 Van Fleet Drive
1953 Van Fleet Drive
1866 Van Fleet Drive
39 feet, 11 inches
39 feet, 11 inches
39 feet, 09 inches
Corner of Garrett and Clements
Corner of Garrett and Dickensen
39 feet, 10 inches
39 feet, 11 inches
Corner of Reinhart and Rosemont
At curve in road on Reinhart
39 feet, 11 inches
44 feet, 07 inches
&
47 feet, 04 inches
1226 Beringer HtStNved
CITY OF SAN JA3INTO
1268 Beringer
1316 Beringer JUN 0 1 2010
1420 Beringer
40 feet, 06 inches
39 feet, 11 inches
39 feet, 09 inches
39 feet, 08 inches
39 feet, 10 inches
39 feet, 10 inches
1475 Beringer Ir CL t/
1524 Beringer BY '�4N
1606 Beringer
1640 Beringer
39 feet, 10 inches
40 feet, 02 inches
Approximate Length in Miles of Selected Streets*
Street Name
Approximately Length
Van Fleet Drive (from Washington to
Commonwealth)
Slightly less than 0.3 mile
Beringer Drive (from East to West points
where streets curves to meet Washington)
Slightly less than 0.9 mile
Villines Street (from Esplanade to Park Hill)
Slightly more than 0.4 mile
Meridian Street (from Park Hill to
Esplanade)
1.0 mile
*Please note that Van Fleet Drive does not extend to Park Hill or Esplanade, it is necessary
to use Mondavi, Beringer, and Commonwealth to make that connection.
4
a al
vYU YPVn1Ey.- w4
Hewitt St
i
f♦
.1)
Vi
(ir\
r�
I
Hki.l0 ll_
oioz t o Nnr
OlNIDvf NHS JD AIIO
a3A13J3H
TO: CITY OF SAN JACINTO: CITY ENGINP.FR
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: PATRICK GEIER & RESIDENTS LIVING ON VAN FLEET DRIVE IN
SAN JACINTO
SUBJECT: REQUEST TO INSTALL SPEED BUMPS ON VAN FLEET DRIVE,
EXTENDING FROM WASHINGTON AVENUE TO
COMMONWEALTH AVENUE
DATE: 4/19/2010
Over the past several years, traffic traveling down Van Fleet Drive has become much heavier
and drivers are substantially less respectful of the 25 mile per hour speed limit posted on the
street This has created dangerous conditions in many forms:
• Children coming to and from school, as well as those that reside in the area can no
longer safely cross the street due to excessive speeding by drivers, many times over
45 miles per hour.
• Children and families riding bicycles on the bike path and along Van Fleet Drive
have had numerous near -misses with cars ignoring the right-of-way for pedestrians
crossing the path from one side of Van Fleet Drive to the other, mainly due to
curves in the street and excessive speeds.
• Homeowners trying either to back out or turn into their residence driveways are
faced with speeding cars that will not yield the right of way but instead honk, cross
over a double -yellow line and otherwise ignore the basic courtesy of waiting for cars
to exit and enter homes.
• An excessive amount of parents that do not live in this area yet bring their children
to school by car ignore posted speeds as well as block traffic along Van Fleet by
parking on both sides of Van Fleet adjacent to Commonweath Avenue, creating a
very narrow passageway to turn onto a..y,off of the street
Jf�/lll�r f
A petition reques i speed bumps be installed on Van Fleet Drive from Washington
Avenue to Common ealth Avenue has been circulated to the resides of the 20 homes that
line Van Fleet Drive. homeowner signatures compris. a omeowners
(there are / vacant houses on the street) have been collected that agree having speed humps
installed will help curb the excessive speed problem. It may also help to reduce the amount
of traffic on this street by people who use it to cut through the neighborhood from Park Hill
to Esplanade instead of traveling along wider streets such as Hewitt. The following criteria
have been met
April 19, 2010
Page 2
Request for Installation of Speed Bumps on Van Fleet Drive
1. Over 51% of the homeowners on Van Fleet Drive are in favor of this request
2. There is a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour.
3. The curb -to -curb width of the street is less than 40 feet.
4. Van Fleet Drive is not a bus transit route.
5. The street's grade does not exceed 5%
The conditions along Van Fleet Drive are highly unsafe. Homeowners here are extremely
tired not only of speeders, but also of cars playing excessively loud music, people throwing
trash out of cars, an inordinate amount of parents ignoring safe parking practices, and cars
using a residential street as a through -fare to avoid traffic signals on larger streets.
Please help us return this neighborhood to the safe, quiet, enjoyable place it used to be by
approving our request and installing the speed bumps as soon as possible. Many of the
homeowners on this street have lived here over 10 years and wish to see what was one of
San Jacinto's first "master planned communities" return to the pleasant neighborhood it was
intended to be.
2
Petition to City of San Jacinto to Place Speed Bumps On Van Fleet Drive
Petition summary and
background
Action petitioned for
This is a petition to request speed bumps be placed on Van Fleet Drive from Washington Street to Commonwealth Avenue
due to hazardous conditions created by drivers who speed excessively on this stretch of road, blatantly ignoring the 25 mile
per hour posted speed limit. The demographics In this area have changed and these speeders create not only a hazard to
those of us who live on this street, but also to school children who walk and cross the street during high traffic times, such
as before school begins and when school lets out.
We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who live along Van Fleet Drive and who urge our city leaders to act now to
place several speed bumps on Van Fleet Drive, before someone gets seriously hurt or killed.
Printed Name
Signature
Address
Comment
Date
NI: L..L.•t :1 i «y.n.,4
•n .---2.S-3:. s0. 2 a
i 1.4t vxi..a 74-etT s , az ;
'IVO 1w..n.i 4prrAY>
4I..
krD
f �
6iC,�L,�
► tq�.g Voy�� c4-
4(i/-
')fIna- C-�ce•(
k
&L-4.., �i��1: J
"� �<'f/'Tnd
l44/0
1 ITLaYIy s� �4G �
Ic�C �y�c-cam �"
dCE.s/aGta
,
/8,,97/ i' cis',pie `�
`i/�U
/-2-/L•
)0,„- -,... ' .,z) e..„,•./
„/
.
r
/11i7..J I�c.GN /C/cGi .,
L ,/F'S tna-*0,`a./�(
-O/c('61.-iteLtc
1'IL
�S�' "') VGL,7Reef-! v
5i--r-c.e_1— c y...Acrcactz1c;)[Irc(s•;c:
etCIIT lip
1
(D C'
,
lc ,b VC.n -1-e _7\ • b, /i
ic.A3G `7 'CG,I`rs 'Ce.c!
cc.lc t.Kr_G;
a. 5c0-Thx ,i
cy1cxy,,A2,. kn
--I
I Vg i t- ail-
7'/D7
-----75-
..�-'
"ick m, e --i vitnscv
I
(of LT3 U,,,.. l- I f el- dire v '
i71GL.rll...{.CtHci G;'i'44.v00-. 1[lva I
'c,t' cc '15 a.r.7 u.,,c,e a `.x/,c.
Li- n% /
" U
V "' I"0.tr=i M Alt
_
l
l.5 'to kic0 VAQ C�/!r,
+4 inA0.n..� 1,eu 1� Cr.ca/
`f /`�/(u
Printed Name
Signature
Address
Comment
Date
D 1 iR1 `t tisse-n
e 4 rno-
CWIA-, `/Y u-1
?O / l zlai1 Cu- - /�-
r1 �1
(2 secs U. dxs
y//a7/1)
WCC4 �e�s
-i 2 9 c elt . 0,42,26,
fqsace ,
/ gei.u4 Fle , 5 . r
7100 2i4Q u ;aiei-5
ie,
C W , 64 tram
53 ,r,4-K .c, -67.p .
LJkc S E\Vi kS
f
Petition to City of San Jacinto to Place Speed Bumps On Van Fleet Drive
Petition summary and
background
Action petitioned for
This is a petition to request speed bumps be placed on Van Fleet Drive from Washington Street to Commonwealth Avenue
due to hazardous conditions created by drivers who speed excessively on this stretch of road, blatantly ignoring the 25 mlle
per hour posted speed limit. The demographics in this area have changed and these speeders create not only a hazard to
those of us who live on this street, but also to school children who walk and cross the street during high traffic times, such
as before school begins and when school lets out.
We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who live along Van Fleet Drive and who urge our city leaders to act now to
place several speed bumps on Van Fleet Drive, before someone gets seriously hurt or killed.
Printed Name
_Signature f�
Address
Comment
Date
A-/4' / f i
Y / `
[ �l . 4,,/ /- / /
U ` /`1
Leslii2_
I 1 co Va4Arlitl-Dc
1_139//°
y' m aivi6
Afr----
4Yg o i/Ft. �� p �
we N6I'
_5/�/i0
0 0-ti ue(s
. al o*
-
!Alit I144 FI oe/02//i)
47%To
eo3'',ptv
l lw, VA-N fleet P2:
Ike- ivEgb - hEse
54
E-
N
70.00 45.01
0
IDS Co
73.00
0
D I L o6S
�06
25
2`
3&
24
24
IOLIS
13
1.043
23
1afa0
14
oSS
22
10-a
LOTA
9e.40
7 Y0
21 28
1 D8L4 los&
70.30
17
53.29
B ♦ 71.00
•a) rye?
30
fit a'1
lo4f
0(99 ttoots 1(Ds
sci r 11.2 -
78 Y/
Icva
75.00
55.00 L=45.02
74
144
102.00
aoa
53.00
30336
106.15
$ 25
av•),5
53.20
2.82
1
66
56
15
2.15
•o
1131
4,
17240
B 84 'M 30600
it
258'
E 74
too
0
n
`fy[� F 1132 -.
78�1 _llo
I110
r
10
1::;4>,,21.7.1* B'I L-65•2
R.57.1.40
ie
L=165•
1`k R=626.120' L.
21.7J L•60. 35' L
"�i.
) 4/ . e.43.
'<Ua
700
63.00ir
f
$
$
33
34
35
CI
(7)
0
()
0
0:1
t134-5
Its(
II'73
0'15
la."t
la
9 B0.'73
-
Q100-
t
Itntl1S1
.W11''
t^1v$nnFleet,D7Sarr Jac" C7,0925831.4'
l;er• g•
•._.'. s. 31 `.
I •, ; F t, ,a + s i
-+lid,"�ji l a ! •..' k !..
3 a`j°i..{'{��e u, ,gy I' Ii •••• 1' r yr 'a
:15:-.L
E �a a4—r�.':?-1111:7477;1;' s
{ItC * '16zi 7 q�JS 1 "t eap�y�}'I a�15E dal�l' Iy'ffi 0�y
C -P" -1^2'\ d%..�...1L.11LX...4-•
ri r "uehin0lan.l y` �t'.xz+e emas — -.�r-
3""< * =iP .75..#'L. CJtiA' a.wlvs'.i*
u ',T f' r 17 r.`• �{ ' g t' —kl - ' 1.1
.l .._,... v s l•.-.[ts `t,i l - +Ar. ii
tlisL
. A. •• - tl .•r S'l i1.
:4'-t,
''Imo•01 Dnto Nov 16;,2cCg
3'46101.O1i`3N
• . t ;. . 4
V ��rAar`
11G'S6 2./, 71; Ark cloy. 16,1,E tlry•
Total Budget
D General Fund $14,343,152
0 Other Funds $28,713,637
_1 Sub -total $43,056,789
0 Capital Projects $27,119,112
• Total Proposed Budget $70,175,901
BUDGET COMPARISON
2009-10 2010-11
GF $14,143,279 $14,343,152
Non $35,558,568 $28,713,637
• CIP $12,094,942 $27,119,112
. Total $61,796,789 $70,175,901
BUDGET COMPARISON
$80,000,000
$70,000,000
$60,000,000
$50,000,000
$40,000,000
$30,000,000
$20,000,000
$10,000,000
$0
/
r
Gen Fund Non GF CIP Total
❑ 2009-10
❑2010-11
General Fund
Projected Revenues
General Government $12,245,668
o Development Services $ 468,500
Total $12,714,168
Revenue Comparison
Two Year Period
FY 2009-10
Li Gen Gov't $12,391,061
Dev Svcs $ 493,670
Total $12,884,731
FY 2010-11
$12,245,668
$ 468,500
$12,714,168
GF Revenues — 4 Years
$18,000,000
$16,000,000
$14,000,000 -
$12,000,000
$10,000,000
$8,000,000 -`
$6,000,000
$4,000,000 -'
$2,000,000 -,
$0
Gen Gov't Dev Svcs Total
2007-08
2008-09
® 2009-10
■ 2010-11
Major GF Revenue Sources
Projected: 2009-10 2010-11
Vhcl Lic Fee $2,840,000 $2,600,000
E Property Taxes $1,812,344 $1,705,129
E Sales Taxes $2,047,595 $2,090,000
Ti Franchise Fees $1,465,000 $1,540,000
Major GF Revenue Sources
$4,500,000
$4,000,000
$3,500,000
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$0
1
VLF Prop Tax Sales Fran Fee
Tax
2007-08
2008-09
• 2009-10
• 2010-11
GF Operating Budget
FY 2008-09
FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11
Gen Gov't $ 4,717,910 $ 3,786,186 $ 3,981,005
Dev Svcs $ 2,960,180 $ 1,274,237 $ 1,185,226
Public Sfty $ 9,072,438 $ 8,653,008 $ 9,176,921
TOTAL $16,750,529 $13,713,431 $14,343,152
GF Operating Budget
$18,000,000
$16,000,000
$14,000,000
$12,000,000
$10,000,000
$8,000,000
$6,000,000
$4,000,000
$2,000,000
$0
7
Gen Dev Svcs Public Total
Govt Sfty
(,/
- 2008-09
2009-10
■ 2010-11
Projected Fund Balances
FY 2009-10
FY 2010-11
Contingency
Reserve
$4,495,774
$4,053,697
Capital
Reserve
$11,549,609
$8,070,182
Development
Svcs
Reserve
$1,272,278
$555,552
Potential Issues
Federal/State Lobbyist -Consideration
Senior Home Repair Program —Increase
Individual Grant Amount
Staffing for Housing Rehab Program
Temporary Clerk for Finance
Li Reorganize Public Works
Conclusion
Ei The budget includes the use of reserves.
The Public Safety CFD continues to be
augmented by the general fund.
Increases in Public Safety contracts
account for more than 70% of the
increase in general fund expenditures.
o Many other general fund programs
actually reduced expenditures from FY
2009-10.
Outlook
CFD delinquency rate is declining.
With no improvement in revenues,
expenditure reductions may be necessary
in FY 2011-12.
r Contingency Reserve projected to be more
than 30% at end of FY 2010-11. Council
policy has been to maintain Contingency
Reserve at not less than 15%.
• Capital Reserves are general fund monies
that can be used at Council's discretion.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
It Finance DeDa rtment
Connie Rogers -Elmore, Interim Finance Dir
T.Tom Prill, General Accounting Manager
Michelle Holmes, Special Dist. Accountant
E. Debbie Vickery, Administrative Secretary
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ffil Department Heads Administration
- Jeff Ballinger Claudia Maunz
Mike Emberton Carolyn Durden
Barry Mulcock
Habib Motlagh
Lt. Bill Tyler/Lt. Sue Trevino
■ Chief Dave Fulcher
■ Asher Hartel
San Jacinto
CITY OF SAN JACINTO 2010
STREET MAINTENANCE
PROJECT (INDEX SHEET)
TRI LAKE
am ia:r%Nt4.tu:
MII TCrnni KN:I Ern*
TRACT 30644
(MAP E)
Capital Projects
1.4
Updates & 2010-11 Budget
06"1111110011111001111
L'41111110'
low-ir SAN
JACINTO
Habib Motlagh, City Engineer
June 3, 2010
j4
City of San Jacinto CIP
Recent Accomplishments
I SAN
JACINTO
Ramona Expwy & Sanderson Ave
Intersection Upgrade
CONSULTANTS INC,
51133A1sN3 WYNOINIIW
J9I SJAV.1.115.RO:)
�xb'�I III
Additional Accomplishments
• 2009 Downtown Sidewalks
• 2009 Downtown Pavement Rehab
• Water Master Plan Improvements (2nd Street,
Vernon Ave)
• De Anza Improvements (Lyon to Palm)
• Sewer Master Plan Improvements (De Anza,
misc. locations)
• Washington Ave Improvements
l K[ LAKE
co SuUrANrS. IN[.
MUNICIPAL ENGINEERS
SAN
JACINTO
City of San Jacinto CIP
2010-11 Key Projects
TRI LAKE
CDN5LL1'ANTS. INC.
MUNICIPAL ENGINEERS
SAN
JACINTO
10-il Key Projects
Sanderson Ave Widening
-Currently under construction
- Completion Sum .,er 2010
MUNICIPAL ENGINEERS
10-11 Key Projects
Street Improvements @ Lyon Ave Basin
— Widen and improve streets around basin (Lyon,
Ramona Blvd, De Anza)
— Funded with Measure A*
*Measure A funds depend on Sanderson final cost
TRI LAKE
coNsuu'AN7S, INC.
MUNICIPAL ENGINEERS
SAN
JACINTO
10-11 Key Projects
7th Street Infill Improvements
— Phase 1 Complete (Main to Santa Fe)
— Phase 2 under construction this summer
(State to Grand)
San Jacinto Ave Median Landscape
— Design completed
— Construction late summer/early fall
Ramona Expressway Rehab
— State Street to Chase Street
— Uses SR 79 Relinquishment money
TRl LAKE
CO CLIpnr'CInc
MUNICIPAL ENGINEERS
L
mown
SAN
JACINTO
of NIDv f
NVS
/Cauow
anaasaIa1!deo jj pue dWn1 umin\ pepund —
asayd
u6!saQ pua Ia1uawu0ainu2 u! /CI1ua uno —
seuai j, `uiBW awls —
seuai 9 'awls uosaepues —
buiuepiM ,4 emsseJdxp euoweH
anaasaj IB1!dBO dO gTinn papun j —
6u!nBd pua `u!a.ap uwois `)IIannapis sapnIauI —
yplaannuowwoQ O1 uoT6uiysBM —
sTueweAojdwl TeeJis 1T!MeH
sloafoad ICa>i u-oi-
4
City of San Jacinto CIP
2010-11 New Projects
Altd111■■
TRI LAKE
cosIj1:Ikw!. INC
MUNICIPAL ENGINEERS
SAN
JACINTO
10-11 New Projects
• Cottonwood Ave Sidewalk — San Remo to
Cope Elementary (SB 821 grant)
• Esplanade Pvmt. Rehab and Pedestrian Path —
Sanderson to Cawston (SB 821 & Msr A*)
• 2011 CDBG Sidewalk and Street Improvement
Project
• San Jacinto Ave and Ramona Ex Interim
Sidewalk
• Water and Sewer Master Plan Upgrades
*Measure A funds depend on Sanderson final cost
sPONIIP
'SAN
JACINTO